Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Seacliff Phase IV - Appeals - W of Goldenwest St, N of Palm (42)
1 r 5upor1or Court OF Till: r rt` v STATE OF CALI 'OlINIA � � In and for thr 00%11t) of Orange ` R Vr CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACHi CITY CLERK �� ` PROOF OF P111I.ICATION • Public Hearing 78-4 State of California Cwnty rA Orange Rita J. Richter That I am and at all times herein mentioned wain citizen of the Lot,..-'Stairs.over the ages of twenty-one years,and that I am not a party'a,nor Interested in the above entitled ittatter, that I am the principal clerk of th^ printer of the Huntington Beach Indei+endent Review a news r of enerai clrculHtion. .ubllshcd in the City of C " Imix R I• ... Huntington Beach County of Oran3e and which newspaper is published for the dis- semination of local news and Inteiligencc of a general character, aid which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still of Al has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, and which A tr newspaper has been established,printed and published at regular IL Inta vale In the said Cowity of Orunge for a period exceeding one year: that the notice,o!which the annexed Is a printed copy, has ; been published In the regular and entire issue of sold newspaper, i and ibt In an) supplement therm(.on the following dales,to wit _ IaMd DeGettyAe.r• .21.+ .1.978 « sti er r I certify for declare i under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true And correct Dated at . ... . . . Carden Grovtr 4 + ' C, rat hls..2lst .day of D !3 ..pig.. 78 1 Sagr:oture r� Form ��377 REO"U T FOR CITY CCXJNCIL ACTION Sobrritted by James W. Palin � Department Planning & Env. Resources Date Prepared December 22 . , 1978 Backup Material Attached L�] Yes E] No Subject ZONE CHANGE No. 78-4 ALONG THE WESTERN BOUNDARY OF SEACLIFF GOLF COURSE City Administrator's Comments The Planning Commission's action on Zone Change Nvomcr 78-4 has been appealed by the applicant; therefore, 1 tun tecon ending that this item tie continued Until 01C r0tVIcil can hear hoth the Zone Ovint;e and Appeal concurrently. Statement of issue, geconimendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Transmitted for consideration is zone Change No . 78-4 , a request by the applicant to change the zoning on 1 . 48 acres of property presently zoned ROS--O to R2••PD-0 and to change 1 .669 acres of Ian-1 presently zoned R2-PD-0 and R3-0 to ROS-0, Subject property is located alone the westerly leq of Seacliff Golf Course. �► RECO?VENDATION: The planning Commission is offering the following alternative for the City Council ' s consi.dcrat- ion and r,-coirbTiend-, the adoption of one of the attached ordinances : 1 . Approve Zone Change No. 78--4 insofar as it requests boundary changes of 1 . 488 acres of ROS-0 zoning tc R2-PD-0 zoning and in no other respect, with the condition that a corresponding 1 . 488 acres of land be dedicated by the applicant and allocated to park acreage in an area to be 3ater determined . 2 . Approve Zone Change No. 78--4 as requested, with the condition that Parcel 4 (a change of zone from ROS--O to R2-PD-0 on 0. 362 acres of land) be deleted from the request . ANALYSIS : Applicant : A. J. Nall Corp. 8305 V? cker s, Suite R San Diego, California 92111 Location : Abutting the westerly edge of the Seacliff Golf Course, north cf Palm avenue, approximately 3 , 000 feet west of Goldenwest Street. Page Two Request: A change of zoning from R2-PD-0, Medium Density Planned Residential Development combined With oil production and R3-0 , Medium Hiah Density Residential , combined with oil production to ROS-0, Recreational open Space combined with oil production, and ROS-0, Recreationa- Open Space , combined with oil production to `22-FAD-0 , Medium Density Planned ;-residential Development combined with oil production . PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ON DECEMBER 12,E 1978: ON MOTION BY PAONF. AND SECOND BY BAZIL, ZONE CHANGE NO. 78--4 WAS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL, SUBJECT TO ONE OF TF!E TWO FOLIOWTNG COURSES OF ACTION WITii THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND I?Y THE rOLLOWING VOTE : 1 . Approve Zone Change No. 78-4 insofar as it requests boundary changes of 1 . 438 acres zf ROS-0 zoning to R2-PD-0 zoning and in no other respects, %ii , . the findings that a corresponding 1 . 488 acres of land be dedicated by the applicant and allocated to park acreage in an area to be later determined; or 2. Approve Zone Change No . 78-4 as requested, with the consideration that Parcel 4 (a change of zone from ROS-0 to A2--PD-0 on 0. 362 acres of land) be deleted from the request . FINDINGS : 1 . The Planned Residential Development zoning exchange for the ROS-0 zoning in some areas and the corresponding exchange of ROS-0 to R2PU-0 in other areas is consistent with the Cit:y' s General Plan. 2 . The proposed uses permitted by the R2-PD-0 zoning will be com- patible with surrounding land uses . AYES : R`jsseil , Cohen, Razil , Paone NOES : Stern ABSENT: Finely ABSTAIN : HiSr,.ns DISCUSSION: Zone Change No. 78-4 is u request to alter the existing westerly boundary of the Seaclif,f Golf Course in order to accommodate. a portion of a 533 unit planned residential. Oevelopment. This proposed boundary change of the Seacliff Golf Course consists of approximately 3 . 55 acres of land which includes approximately 1 . 5 acres of property presently zoned ROS-0 to be rezoned to R2-PD-0 in order to accommodate a portion of the proposed Seaclif.f Phase IV and in turn approximately 1 . 7 acres of property presently zoned R2-PD-0 and R3-0 to be rezoned to ROS-0. After lengthy discussion by the Planning Commission and several. motions that failed because of lack of affirmative votes, the Planning Commission agreed on recommending to the Council that one of the above mentioned alternatives be considered in order to approve Zone Change No. 73-4 . The Planning Co►amiasion ' s first alternative would be to have the Council approve only the property 04 Page Three that is presently zoned ROS to R2-PD-0 which will accommodate those portions of the Seacliff Phase IV project that encroaches into the westerly boundary of the Seacliff Golf Course and require of the developer that an equel amount of land , 1 . 488 acres, be dedicated to the City For park development. This additional 1 . 498 acres of land would be in addition to the park requirements required by ordinance for this project . Alternative two would be to approve Zone Change 78--4 as requested with the deletion of parcel 4 as depicted on the attached plat map. This would a'-low for and accom- modate of t.x3 proposed project to encroach into the existing golf co,arne except for one area consisting of 0. 362 acres that falls within one of the exist'ing fairways . The Council ' s third alternative would be to approve Zone Charge No. 78--4 in total as requested by the appli- cant. The Planning Commission feels that this alternative is the least desirable insofar as the property that is changing from R2-PD-0 and R3-0 to ROS-0 is not the most desirable for opera space uses . ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Seacliff Phase IV project has been reviewed for environmental impacts by Environmental Impact Report No. 77-6 , This EIR has been posted for the prescribed amount of time and pursuant to all provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act all comments , either in writing or oral. have been incorporated into the final draft EIR . This final. draft EIR was approved by the Planning Commission on November 14 , 1978 . Zone Change No . 78-4 has been assessed for environmental effects by Negative Declaration No. 78-119 . This negative declaration has been posted for the prescribed length of time and no com.ents el.ther oral or in writing, have been received by the Planning Department as of this date . The City Council is required to adopt Negative Declaration No . 78-119 prior to a final decision for Zone Change No. 78-4 . Attached is a copy of the initial study prepared for Negative Declaration No . 78-119 . This initial study form has been included for the council ' s review and consideration . FUNDING SOURCE: Not applicable. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: In addition to the isreviously mentioned alternatives, the City Council may deny Zone Change No. 78--4, which would require the applicant of Seacliff, Phase IV to redesign the boundaries of the proposed subdivision in order to develop only those areas that are presently zoned for development . .agPPORTING INFORMATION: I . Area Map for Seacliff Phase TV 2. Plat to accommodate legal description for Zone Change dated November, 1978 3. Staff Report for Seacliff Phase IV dated November 7, 1978 4 . Alternative ordinances espectfu ubmitted , 71 amen Palin Acting Planning Director .` � / r _ � 1�•� � lam` \ R3-0 i»tlll 7 `\ \ 3-0 {' •� -_ -R4-0I _ R4-0 / • �`' ROS-0 R4-01 ROS-0� • P1a4,Kiirg Area "A" R"-Ol - ?c 10069 ` Fl Ci-0 0068 _O ; , ??arming t�rea ,M2-0 i "IT :Ou67 R2, Pb-01 R4-0 S, - Ei2-02 M2-02 r FACHric TEN'T AT I VE TRACT 10067 L TENTATIVE TRACT 10068 , TENTATIVE TRACT 10069 "le CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 77-23 <� zone R2-PD-0 IIUKTINGTON 6EACN FLMNING DEPT. ram/ /-1. .• i Planning Commission James E. Gerspac s c/o, James Palin, Director Division Chief SEACLIFF PHASE 4 September 11 , 1978 -i Due to the configuration of the proposed project, I suggest that the ,.f •:,-;,' following information be submitted and made a part of the "Final Public Report!, on, this project. The project has been designed to the minimum acceptable street width and turning radius standards. Throughout the project, there are places where, ' if people ark automobiles in other than designated parking spaces ener ent P 9 P 9 � 9 y vehicular access will be inhibited and in some instances precluded. There •ram: : . are numerous places throughout the project 'where, if landscaping projects beyond the curb line into the street below a minimum height of 1316", emergency vehicular access will be inhibited. Product C has large buildings •,,,,A.wMch require a large fire flow. This means longer hose lays than typical ..Vin residential areas because of travel distances to enough hydrants to r�, provide •the required fire flow.' The result will be a longer time necessary �►; `' '-.to' set' up'firefighting operations than one would find in most typical °residential occupancies. 'The result of the foregoing will be, that the Fire Department may not be able to provide the same level of service that it currently provides the majority of the remainder of the City. The level of service will be less in ..that response times will be longer to both fires and medical emergencies. :JEG:cw At �•�•-�'I,""AI''�f/'l1' /t�'..t\ ,M♦!•1y'!y•d /7/�.=' �JMtI'll!• ��f��t�'!•0 . • '�i'J�'"tr'rT AI' of 4rltW*,e MAP WAR, wriOAP •w .� X�'k'�w�v n.u' 441sr �sr f�, '_.. _. �« .r s�r•w•1rIAPPYArr 1Kor' If' tet P 06114 /DApoppo X 6•�i'X'•At' el!lf�•;' •..A'GI'�K'O�"A /Dl.!✓' P.��CEI 7- ,Pt-P1�dl0,Pl�S•11 ,,.y � ter' '�7� 7�•f/�7�1I ,7��� �Y1f'.ol'/rt hN la''' -,.ylO•!:a-A /!s'•fi'• A*f we oA�,L'�L lii- �P7! ! �Yr6'•L'''3f3 flrr.'- . 1101'RIMP /Vo l �',►•iDlot jwI ;ifIP*frWt• X /AIrI' ,y�r�i•svw �t<tr..,� _ � / /Well o� R11S�010 .1•A'D•A''td AAA' St'D!E i''!VG' `�'.,.wit'n'.r't(RJ irros• AW1r AP AWA tl✓ DEC ri 0006aw. um AZZAIo,W 41r: )r/7 AA iirAMAW , III , 'AV Lid►�L A1 4A 411'0 MOW Jr. ► r +,rat . Am 17/+9 Awaor AW.. itrr .x, • ' • huntingfn betr, 'i pkmnimg department o TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Department DATE: November 7 , 1970 SUI3,'-::T ., - ACL I I:'I" PIIAr -' IV UutJl__ClIi+I�C;I NO ._.IH-`I N(.). _7_7_2 .?.,_ -7�I;N'I'rgjVE PARCEL I-V) No . 78 - 37 'I'I:tl't'ATI VI; 'PRACT NO ._10067 TEN,,m7 Z�'E T %CT _t?o. _I-0.N68, f-_rQ'rATIVR-' _ NO. 10069 1MVIROIJMENTAL IMPACT HEI'mer tJO . 77-6 LI?PILIC�I�I�r A. J. }Dill. Corp . R-'- IUD-0 , 8305 Vie),ers, :;uit-o "R" -- hQS-0 , h.3-0 San Oiegcs, California 92111 ENG114FE: W`al�ien and i►:�;,nt.i ��t_�:. , Inr. C;f? J{__I��1i, PLAN: 125 E. Wiker 1 5 Planned Communi t I, Costa Mesa , Calif . 9?62 6 EKI q'I'INV USE LOCATION- test of Goldr_nwe,t , north of. Vae3nt and 0i .1 Production pal Ili ZONE CIIAN(-jI-: DA*I'." ACCEPTED: Jan . 16, 117 i�han�re of 7Utle fs-am ltt7.S-t7 to R2-PI)--o �t��tJi�A9'()Rt�' PROCESS IIIC,_ UA7'I. t Continued by Consent ACRF'AGE: 2 . 8 ar- re5 CONDITIQUItL UAL DATE _ACCEI!'CI:U : Nov. II , 197" a 3 3 :: i r�rr Icy f,7r+ti i } 1 �rui i j�..iJI�;�'i'�)StY i't2o�'I S.�+_i Ili; DA U townhouse i.o, ident is 1 uni is Continued by C-,%nsent: ACREAGF: 11 d acres 'I'R:i17ATI`IE PARCEL I-V% ? QATI•* ACCEPTED: Oct. 5. 1978 4 lots DATE: Iovember 24 , 1.978 AC'RtEAGI:: 300 acres Page Two TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 10067 DATE ACCEPTED: Nov. 11, 1977 190 lot:; ; one .lettered lot MAmm,rom, VROCESSING_ DATE' : (Product B) Continued by Consent ACREAGE : 91 gross acres TENTATIVE—TRACT- NO . 10068 DATE ACC:F;I?i' D : Nov. 11, 1977 one lot (Product C) t•111NDATORY 3HOCESSING• DATE: Continued by Consent ACREAGE : 19 . 4 gross .�cres TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 10069 DATE ACCEPTED: Nov. 11. 1977 147 lots , one lettered lot MANDATORY (-IROCESSIt�G DATE (Product A) Continued by Consent CREAGE: 53 . 6 gross acres 1 ._0 SUGCE.STED ACTION: If the Planning Commission finds that the project is not prejudicial to the Local Coastal Plan , staff recommends approval of the subject ap- plicationswith findings and conditions as suggested. Staff further recommends approval of Resolution of Intent No. 1237, initiating a precise plan of street alignment for 38th Street from Palm to Garfield . 2 .0 C�FNERAL INFOft�.ATIaN: The subject applications were processed in conjunction at the request of staff so that all issues could be discussed at one time . specifically the proposals are 4s follows : 2. 1 ZONE CHANGE. 78-4 This is a request to rezone 2 . 8 acres along H-P western edge of Seacliff Golf Course from ROS-0 to R2-PD-0 thereby adjusting the boundary between the course and the proposed development . 2 .2!JDITIQRAL -USE PERMIT 77-23 This is a request for a three-part planned development consisting of 533 single family and townhouse units on 114 gross acres of land at an overall density of 4 . 67 Units per gross acre. Page Three 1 . 3 TENTATIVE PA CEI� BAP 78-37 This proposed parcel map would divide two existing 300 acre parcels into 3 parcels and a residual parcel to alloh for further subdivision as a planned development . 2.4 TENTATIVE TRACT 10067, 10068, 10069 These tentative tracts constitute and subdivide the three product areas of the planned development . 3.0 SUMMARY OF ISSUES As a result of extensive staff,, Commission and public review, the following significant issues have surfaced regarding ::his project . 1 . Impact of the proposed development on the Local Coastal Plan. 2 . Feasibility and acceptability of proposed drainage system . 3 . Availability of adequate sewerage capacity. 9 . Acceptability of proposed circulation system including 38th Street alignment, interior access , and parking . 5. Park requirement implementation . 6. Treatrrittnt of scenic highway and special street landscaping. 7. Location of Product C 8 . Applicant ' s request for special permit to deviate from certain code requirements . 4 .0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Environmental Impact Ker+art 77_6 was prepared by the: consulting firm of Ultrasystems , Tn,-- . in r.:onjunction with the Planning Department. A draft EIR was distributed to governmental agencies and interested members of the public during a 45-day review period from December 1 , 1977, to January 16, 1978, to solicit comments regarding the project . The public review period was extended for an additional 137 days at the request of the applicant so that discussions could be held with agencies objecting to certain aspects of the project . During the course of the review period, project design modifications were made by the applicant- to mitigate impacts identified through the EIR . Major areas of probable impact that were identified in the EIR include consistency with the Local Coastal Plan, project drainage and its effect on the Bolsa Chica, traffic impacts from a projecL-ed 5, 130 additional vehicle trips per day, sewage system capacity, archaeological resources, and compatibility with the County linear park and the nolsa Chica wildlife area . Comments were received from public agencies and private individuals on all of these areas of concern . r" r• • Page Four , The Final. EIR is composed of the Draft EIR as it was circulated for review, the comments and project changes received during the review period, and the City ' s response to the comments. This document- was transmitted to the Planning Commission on August 24 , 1978, for Final consideration . A supplementary study of the feasibility of the proposed drainage system was conducted subsequently. That study , Ge is end Ftvdroaeologic P.sse:;s_ m nt by Geoteehnical Consultants is proposed as amendment to the EIR . Appropriate mitigation measures suggested by the EIR are incorporated as conditions of approval . 5 .0 PRESENT . LAND USE, NE Zc `IIf7Gl AND GERAL _ LAN DESIGN TA ION: Toe 114 acre project are�i is currently vacant or in oil production . It is zoned R2-PD- 0 , R2-PD-01 , R3-0 , and RO S-0 and General Planned as Planned Comr�-�nity. To the north and northwe t, the area is General Planned as Planned Community and Planning Reserve in un- incorporated territory. 'rhe zoning of this mixed vacant and oil production area is R3-0. To the west and ' south, the area is General Planned Planned Community and Resource Produt.tion. Existing zoning is R2-PD-0 , R4-0, R4-0i , M2-02, R3-0 , R3-01 , and C1-0: and existing use is vacant and oil production. To the east, the area is General Planned open Space, Planned Community, and Low Density Residential . It is zoned SOS-0, R4-0I , R4-0 , R1 , and R1-0: and it is utilized for a golf course, oil production, and single family development . ti portion of the area is also vacant . 6 .0 STATISTICAL INFORN14TION: 6.1 Number of Units 533 6. 2 Area of Project 114 gr . ac . ; 99. 9 net ac . 6. 3 Density 4 . 67 du/gac: 5 . 3 du/nac 6. 4 Unit Type 2 bedrooms 145 un . 3 Bedrooms 224 un . 4 Bedrooms 138 un . 5 Bedrooms 26 un. Bedrooms per gross acre 14 . 41. bedrooms 6 . 5 Site Coverage (allowable 45%) 20% 6 .6 Common Open .5hace Provided 1 , 050, 474 square feet Required 561, 200 square feet 6.7 Private Open Space Provided 1 , 062, 864 square feet Required 170, 050 square feet maximum 1'age F"ivo 6 . 8 1-3:arkino : Product _� Product. 11 PradUCt C Provided : 825 _ 575 437 Requirod : 478 618 490 An individual gLat. istical settrunFer}' for eac-,h Product area i., included with i�roject Plans �;ubn•.itted to the Planninq Commission . 7 . 0 suppi nsioN COI-."•lI TTFE : The Subdivision Cornmi ttee riot three time.,-; on the pro j e4 t . At the first session on Uecewber 9 , 1977 , Coiwidssioner-s :'inlc:y, and Slates listencd as staff representatives, reviewed street layouts , sewer capacity , and ;.special landsc,,,ne treatment . General.l , the Committee concluded snore information was necessary . On January 20 , 1978 , thn C'UMITlit t-CM inelUditlr3 Co1,1ntissioners Finley and Ne%,:man t aviewed proposed revisions to the 38th Street alignment and Parking provisions in Product Areas A and 11. The Subdivision Cotiunittoe, conc-istinct of Commissioners Finley, eazil , and Stern , met i-ic;ain on At.tclust 18 , 1978 to consider revised plans . A�:. that t. .rne, major issues discussed inc,ludud th : proposed drainage system and its effect on 11o3sa Chira and existing rind proposed sewer capacities . The Committee asked that: i0volved agencies be contacted again for upua tfjd - -orrria t ion on these projects . The Committee directed staff �:o find a suitable way to insure that special landscape treatments and meandering sidewalks are incorporated into the project . The Committee discussed ctenerally the issues outlined in Section 3 . 0 and concluded that further reviet•., of the project be conducted by the Commission as a whole. A Planning Commission Study Session was scheduled to review Phase IV. As a result of its discussion and the presentation by the appl ' cant, . n;a Cummi.::sion concluded that a Resolution of Intention defining a Precise Plan of S'-reet Alignment for 38th Street be adopted in conjunction with any {project approval . The Conunission reviewed the applicant' s request for spee'.al permit . In general , no opposition was voiced to reduction of minimum side y.-trds -ind el iminat-ion of trash enclosures in products A and S or reduction of building separation requirement and waiver of building bulk provisions in Product C . Commissioners were concerned , however, about park '.ng shortages in Products B and C, and elimination of recreation area req,.,irements in Products „ and B . The Planning Cotnrni scion tr,c!t again on September 12 , 1978 , to discuss this project . In joint session with the Recreation and Parks Commission , the Commissioners concluded that action on Phase: IV cannot be postponed for development of a comprehensives parks plan, that determination of 38th Street alignment could be a major City contribution to progress on the linear bluff park, and that the Zinc-:,r nark can assist in filling neighborhood park needs but not replace individual neighborhood parks. Meeting independently, the Cutntnissioners suggested that full dedication and improvement of 3°4--h Street be required and voted to in- vestigate means of securing additional bluff top properties to contribute to the linear park . Page Six 8 .0 -ANALYSIS : Prior to action on the various applica ions constituting Seacliff Phase IV, the following areas of concern must be thoroughly addressed: 8 . 1 I1nvact on the Local Coastal Plan The proposed development is generally compatible with the General Plan and existing zoning. However, because the project site lies entirely within the Coastal Zone, it will be affected by the local coastal planning efforts underway at the direction of the Coastal Act of 1976 . Upon certification by the Coastal Conuninsion , the Local Coastal Plan will supercede all previous plans for this area . Though work on the Local Coastal Plan is underway, a coastal element to the General Plan is not anticipated prior to April , 1979 . Severall, coastal issues are being investigated as part of the LCP for this area : protection of new potentials , potential for .Low- and moderate-income housing, impact, on adjacent sensitive areas, potential for visitor serving facilities including parking, and potential for oil/gas facilities expansion . The do*.-elupment proposal is not necessarily inconsistent with the policies of the Coastal Act . Considerable provision has been made for aesthetics , open space, bluff setback, and scenic highway treatment; and residential use is not per se prohibited . Because the ultimate coastal plan is not complete, however, a key issue becomes the impact of Jecisionrnak.ing now on future planning options . The Commitment of 114 acres to a particular use at this time may preclude planning decisions (; hen the results of coastal research is known) and, therefore, prejudice the LCP. While literally any decision could be said to in some way limit future planning options, certain specific facts are important in this case: 1 . The size of the project area . 2 . Its Location adjacent to a sensitive area whose ultimate utilization has riot yet been determined, and 3 . The uncertainty of future needs for this area for natural resource production and/or processing . On the other hand , this project guarantees continued options for bluff park planning, comes not restrict public access to any waterway or public resource areas , and provides a desirable aesthetic environment in an area planned for residential use for some time . Prior to determination on the project itself, the Commission should conclude whether the project is prejudicial to the preparation of the LCP . 8 . 2 Drainage Considerable discussion has taken place zegarding the feasibility and desirability of the proposed drainage system for the project . The main issues are immediate and long-term capacity, impacts on water quality, and impacts on the Bolsa Chica . The final drainage proposal arrived at by the applicant in conjunction with the Department of Public Works, Water Quality Control District, and California Department of Fish and Game involves utilization of the natural drainage course enhanced by three w Page Seven retention/percolation ponds , new culverts at 38th Street, improvement of the channel front the culvert to the E3olsa Chica , creation of a drop structure to slow water velocities , and reconstruction of the road below the bluffs. A special geologic and hydrogeologie assess- ment of the proposed system was conducted by Geotechnical Consultants , Inc . This study found the proposal technically feasible and the Public Works Dvpartment has concluded that it is adequate for the proposed development and can be expanded in the future to accommodate additional projects in the area . The Regional Water Quality Control Board has granted clearance of the proposal , and the State Department of Fish and Came has concluded that the revised proposal adequately addresses its concerns regarding impact on the Bolsa Chica provided adequate +;►aintenance of the system is insured . 8 . 3 Sewer CaUaci`y Two alternative sewering proposals have been considered for this project: either incorporation of reaches 3 (Dortion) , 4 Lind 5 (portion) of the Sanitation District Master Plan under reirnburs-,ment with the District or con- struction of parallel lines to the existing City system. For overall economy , the .Sanitation District recommends participation in the Master Plan facilities . In either instance, adequate severing depends on approval arid completion of Reaches 1 and 2 of the PCN trunk line now pending on appeal before the State Coastal Commission . Because the nature of the development and its sewerage options are consistent with the Sanitation District Master Plan, the District .is not recommending any delay in project approval . Consistent with pry •.ions Planning Commission actions on similar projects , the sewer issue is addressed as a recommended condition of approval , prohi.bitinc; recordation of final maps until the coast trunk sewer or acceptable alternative is approved . 8 . 4 38th Street Alignment The proposed alignment of 38th Street through th►:! project areas repre- sents the culmination of negotiations among City Staff, Coastal Com- mission Staf �:, and the County Environmental Management Agency . According to county and city staff analysis , the alicninent is a minimum of 100 to 200 feet to the east of top of bluff as defined by EMA, and the County staff has concluded that the alignment is sufficiently set back from bluff ' s edge to not: interfere with the proposed .linear park. Analysis of the alignment by Planning and Public Woi ks Departments as well as Planning Commission Study Session concluded that- it does not preclude future street options either north or south or the project area . As requested by the Planning COrtunission, Resolution of Intention No. 1237 is included for adoption to initiate a Prec{ se Plan of Street Alignr.Znts for 38th Street -front Palm Avenue north to Garfield . 8, 5 113teri.or Circulation In the EIR and throughout staff analysis considerable attention has been focussed at street widths , turning radii, entry drives , and emergency access. The proposed plasis constitute revisions to original proposals designed to address the impacts identified and are acceptable to staff . Product A incorporates 32 foot wide streets with parking permitted on orte side only . All turning radii will be designed to Fire Department Page Eight standards, entry drives have been expanded to allow additional stacking, and all driveways will be a minimum of 20 feet to relieve on street parking pressures . To improve circulation and access, Product 13 interior streets were revised to include median planters to discourage illegal parking in areas where parking bays dice not exist . Entry drives along Palm Avenue were lengthened and widened to expand holding capacity and Facilitate turning movements . Interior circulation in Product C was revised to incorporate minimum and exterior turning radii and added exits and emergency access . With these changes , all Product areas meet minimum street width and turning radius standards . However, the Fire Department is still ccncerned with emergency access to the project and is recommending (by memo of Sept . 11 , 1978 attached) that its concern for reduced response times be noted in the Final. Public Report an the project . 8 .6 Parking Products B and C do not meet minimum parking requirements . Product B is technically 43 spaces short though all driveways are at least 20 feet to accommodate parking needs not usually possible in planned developments. On the other hand , availability of guest parking is restricted by the street- configuration and cluster nature of the development . Product C is approximately 53 spaces below code requirement . The applicant designed the project in this manner to comply with Coastal Commission staff direction . Because of the greater density of this project, its typical PD design, and the minimum access provided , parking for this Product may be a critical issue. Despite the apparent differences in coastal staff and City parking standards , the Coastal Coaanission has not officially required any parking reduction in projects approved to date. The applicant has requested a special permit to vary parking requirements for these two product areas . 8. 7 Par% RecYuicements The Phase IV project will generate approximately 8 acres of park dedication:. Because no park is currently planned within or adjacent to the project , the land dedication will be taken at a later date to be used as designated by the City Council . The Planninq Commission and Recreation and Parks Commission have opened discussions regarding parks in the Seacliff area . 8 .8 Scenic Highways 38th Street along the northwestern edge of the project appears in the Scenic Highways Element as an extension of Edwards Avenue and is designated as a local scenic route. Though a specific implementation plan for the scenic route proposal has not been prepared, the intent of the program is to beautify certain streets with intensified landscaping, medians, increased building setbacks, height requirements , etc. The Seaeliff IV proposal along 38th Street incorporates these features to great degree : landscape buffers are provided, landscaped berms instead of perimeter walls are propised , building setback is considerable, parking areas are adequately screened, 38th is being designed to include landscape medians , street landscaping is intensified. Page Nine 8 ..9 S&Ceet Landscaping The applicant is proposing intensified landscape treatment includinU meandering sidewalks along all public streets . Though staff recognized the aesthetic attributes of the proposal , the Public works Department rejected the idea in view of maintenance costs involved . The Sub- division Committee directed staff to pursue the special treatment, however, and the applicant has agreed to assume all landscape maintenan^e if the City will accept dedication, maintenance, and liability for the meandering sidewalk . The City Attorney ' .s office has determined that such an arrangement is possible , though cumbersome, and perhaps unnecessary since the City can leave both sidewalk and landscaping in private ownership and require public access to the sidewalk without liability or maintenance responsibility. This is staff recom,iendation through conditions of approval on the tentative tracts . 8 . 10 Location of Product C Some concern has been raised about locating the higher density product close to the linear park and the ©olsa Chica . This issue, however, involves conflicting principles . On the one hand , the proposed location conforms to General Plan locational criteria in terms of arterial access and recreational facilities . It also overlaps the R3-0 zoning area originally intended for even higher density use. On the other hand, it conflicts with General Plan criteria calling for lower density buffers near sensitive areas and proximity to business and institutional uacs . In an area where urban uses could be made inconspicuous , this product offers the greatest building bulk and highest density of the three product types . A decision to relocate this pr-(.,,:'uct area could necessitate major overhaul of the entire project . Some impacts can be mitigated by the suggested condition to fence the west side of 38th Street to restrict access to the sensitive areas . 8 . 11 Reauest for Special Permit City Planning Department standards contain provisions for deviation from code requirements in order to promote better living environ- ments , facilitate innovative design and site planning, and create an aesthetic environment. The applicant has forwarded a request for seven special permit items which he Feels are necessary to achieve his design concept . In summary, staff recommends the following action on those items : 1 . Approve reduction of minimum side yard from 15 to 10 feet in Products A and B because the zero side yard concept is used and adequate average separation between units is provided. 2 . Approve elimination of trash enclosures in Products A and B because each single family unit can adequately be served individually. Page 'fen 3 . Approve 43 space parking reduction in Product p because driveway design is greater than typical Planning Department projects , guest parking is located throughout the project and a true ratio of 4 . 5 spaces per unit is provided which excc(xis no=--a standards. 4 . Approve reduction of building separation requirement to 10 feet at corners of buildings in Product C because of building offset, adequate average separation, and architectural features . 5. Deny reduction in narking requirements for Product C becaui.e of project density, design , limited on-sight quest parking potentials , and minimum accessibility of units from on-street parking. 6 . Approve elimination of recreation area requirements for Products A and D because of compensating private open space provisions as well as excess corcunor, open space . 7 . Approve waiver of building bulk provision for Product C to allow 8 units per building and two story end units because the intent of the code is met. by building design, varying elevation and offsets . 9 . 0 RECOMMENDATIONS : If the Planning Commission finds that the project is not prejudiciai to the Local. Coastal Plan, staff recommends approval of the subject appli- cations with Findings and conditions. 1 . Approve Environmental Impact Report 77-6 as amended to include the an letter r Water Oua iq Control of 5epteair�r 7.e of October 31, 1978, n-r2. Approve Zone Change 78-4 with the following finding3 : 1 . The planned residential. development zoning is Consistent with the City ' s General Plan . 2. The proposed uses permitted by the R?-PD-0 zoning will be compatible with surrounding land uses . 3 , Approve Conditional Use Permit 77-43 with the following findings and conditions . FINDINGS : 1 . The proposed use of property is consistent with the.. General Plan. 2 . All design and improvement features are proposed in compliance, with City Ordinances. standards, and special permits granted by the Planning Commission . =VITIONS: 1 . The site plan received and dated October 18 , 1978 shall be the approved layout subject to conditions of approval . 2. All details and amenities of the development as shown on the site plan and supplementary plans shall be constructed as indicated Page Eleven within the development , including but not limited to open space and water areas , textured pavements , fencing, schematic elevations, materials and colors, recreation facilities, pedestrian walkways , oil island treatments , etc . 3 . Prior to issuance of building permits , all exterior building elevations shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department . 4 . The CC&R ' s and association rules shall set forth provisions for restriction on the storage of recreational vehicles in open parking spaces . 5. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall submit a final landscape plan for review and approval by the Planning and Public Works Departments . 6 . Prior to start of construction, the developer shall install a traffic signal at the intersection of Palm Avenue and Goldenwest Street in accordance with the specifications of the Director of Public Works . 7 . Prior to issuance of certificate of occuuancv, a caved, temporary eriergency access 3ur_h as thit existing no,•; .. shall bo available in a manner satisfactory to the Fire Chief from rho termination of 38th Street improvements north to Garfield Street . 8 . All qarages within Product C shall be equipped with automatic garage door openers. 9. If the developer proposes to provide air conditioning, the insulation in ceilings and exterior walls shall be a minimum of R--19 and R-11 respectively . If no air conditioning is to be provided , the insulation in ceilings and exterior walls shall be a minimum of. R-13 and R-7, respectively . 10. All building spoils such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable materials shall be disposed of at an offsite facility equipped to handle them. 11 . A chemical analysis as well as tests for physical properties of the soil on the subject property shall be submitted to the City for review prior to the issuance of building permits . 12 . The structures on the subject property, whether attached or detached, shall be constructed in compliance with the State Acoustical Standards set: forth for all units that lie within the 60 CNEL contours of the property. 13 . Energy saving lighting , such as high-pressure sodium vapor lamps , shall be used in recreation areas . 1.4 . Low-volume heads shall be used on all spigot,a and water faucets . Page Twelve 15. Crime prevention techniques shall be applied to the design of the project (e.g. , single--cylinder lacks , etc. ) . 16 . Construction teciatiques recommended in the geotechnical investi- vation shall be undertaken to the satisfaction of the Director of Building and Community Development . 17 , Prior to the issuance of building permits , the developer shall submit to the Planning Department for review and approval , a fully dimensioned site plan for all lots within the subdivision . 13 . Prior to the :,:;:;u��nc.c of buildirlct hermits for any iot$ within the ::ul)(liviSi011 , (10Llilod calculations eased on final building plans shall b(2 submitted to the. Planning Department and Buildinq DcpartmQnt- fos* rt�vie%,; ,111c1 Ipproval , insuring that interior noise levels for all :;tructures shell not -exceed the California Noise Insulation Standards of 45 db CNEL. 19 . -Provisions shall be contained within the CC& R ' s authorizing the Board of Directors of the Homeowners Association to impose fines on violators of the marking restrictions . 20 . Approval of Conditional Use Pc-rmit. No . 77-2 .3 shall be null and void if zone change 78-4 does not become effective . 21 . Prior to recordation of Final Maps, CC&R ' s shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval . 22 . Prior to issulance of certificate of occupancy, fcrring shall be installed on the northwest side of 38t;h Street: to prohibit access to the surroirndinl oil operations, bluffs, and marsh area unless the area is held in ownership by a public agency. 23. Product: C shall be revised to meet minimum parking requirements as set forth in Section 9362 . 16 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code . The revised site plan shall be submitted to the Planning Commission prior to recordation of Tract 10068 . Q . Approve Tentative Parcel Map 78-37 with the following findings and conditions: FINDINGS : 1 . The proposed parcel map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. The proposed parcel map is in compliance with standard plans and specifications on file with the City as well as in compliance with the State Map Act and Supplementary City Subdivision ordinance. CON2_1TIQN5: 1 . The tentative parcel map received by the Planning Department on October 5, 1978 shall be the approved layout subject to conditions of approval . Paqe Thirteen 2 . A parcel map shall be filed with and approved by the Department of Public Works and recorded with the Orange County Recorder. 3 . Water supply and sewage disposal. shall be through the City of Huntington Reach at the time of development . 4 . A copy of the recorded parcel map shall be filed with the Planning Department . 5 . The boundaries of parcels 1 and 3 shall be extended to include the full rights-of-way of 38th Street and Palm Avenue . The boundary of Parcel 2 shall be extended to include to total right-of--way of Palm, Avenue. 6. Approval of Tentative Parcel Map 78- 37 shall be null and r.•nid if Zone Change 78--4 does not become effective . 5 . Approve Tentative Tracts 10067 , 10068, and 30069 with the following findings and conditions . (The following findings and conditions shall apply separately to each tract but are listed jointly here for ease of reference) FINDINGS : 1 . The proposed subdivision is consistent with the General and Specific Plans applicable to this property . 2 . The design and improvement features of the proposed subdivision is in compliance with standard plans and specifications on file with the City as well as in compliance with the State Map Act and supplementary City Subdivision Ordinance. 3 . The site is physically suitable for the type and density of the development proposal 4 . The design of the subdivision and its improvements is unlikely to cause substantial environmental damage or cause serious public health problems . 5 . The design of the subdivision and its improvements do not conflict with public easements . CONDITI0145 : 1 . The tentative maps received October 18, 1978 shall be the approved layout subject to conditions of approval . 2. Palm Avenue , A and A Streets, and 38th Streets shall be dedicated and fully improved to u%imate right-of-way. 3. The borders of Tentative Tract 10069 a:id Tentative Tract 10068 shall be expanded to include the full rights--of-way of Palm Avenue and 38th Street. The borders of Tentative Tract No. 10067 shall be expanded to include the full right-of-way of Palm Avenue. Page Fourteen 4 . The developer shall submit a 25 -year hydrology and hydraulic study and 100-year calculations for the protection of structures per the Orange County Flood Control District requirements . 5 . Final design of drainage system, retention basins, and channel improvements shall be subject to approval by the Director of Public Works and the California Department of Fish and Game prior to recordation of a final map. This system shall be designed to provide for siltation and erosion control both during and after construction of the project . 6 . Sewer, water, and fire hydrant systems shall be subject to City standards . 7 . Vehicular access rights to Palm Avenue , 38th Street, A and B Streets shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach except at private entry drive intersections . 8 . Street rights-of--ways d^dicated to the City for A and B Street shall include •+• 40 feet back of curb to back of curb. All street landscaping and meandering sidewalks shall be owned and maintained by the Homeowner: 1',;sor•iation . Public access shall be provided on perimeter s-:.dcwalks . 9 . Street right-of--way dedicated to the City for Palm Avenue shall include + 92 feet south from back of curb on the north in- corporating an 8 foot off-street bike trail on the south in lieu of sidewalk . A meandering sidewalk shall be provided on the north side of the street which shall be owned and maintained along with intensified street landscaping by the homeowners Association. Public access shall be provided on thi3 perimeter sidewalk. 10 . 38th Street shall be dedicated and fully improved to its ultimate right-of-way. A meandering sidewalk and intensified street landscaping shall be provided on the east side of the street and shall be owned and maintained by the Homeowners Association . Public access shall be provided on this perimeter sidewalk. 11 . No final map shall record until the Pacific toast Highway Trunk Sewer is approved by the California Coastal Commission or an alternative sewer system acceptable and designed to both the City and the Orange County Sanitation Distr.iCL standards is approved . 12 . All entryways from public streets shall have a minimum 30 foot curb radius . 13 . All inner-turning curb radii s.nall be a minimum of 17 feet and outer curb radii shall be 45 feet . 14 . In Tentative Tract 10069 , landscape planters with parking on one side only shall be extended in a perpendicular fashion on each end to denote parking area . 15 . Median breaks and left turn lanes in both directions shall be pro- vided in Palm Avenue at each entry point to Tentative Tract 10067 . Pane Fifteen 16. The developer shall be responsible for installation and maintenance of berming, landscaping, and noise attenuation treatment south of Palm Avenue. 17 . Prior to recordation of the Final Maps , the developer shall file with the City a letter of aq;-eement to accept drainage from public streets into the r43vate drainage system. 18 . Approval of Tentative Tract Nos . 10067, 10068 , and 10069 shall be null and void if Zone Change No . 78-4 does not become effective . 19. Interior private streets in Tentative Tract 10067 shall provide two minimum travel lanes of 12 feet from curb face to median curb face . 20 , Detailed plans for noise attenuation on the south side of Palm Avenue shall be approved by the Planning Department prior to issuance of building permits. 21 . Park debt generated by these subdivisions shall be secured by dedication of land from the property owner at such time and in such location as agreed upon by the Planning Commission, Recreation and Parks Conanission, and City Council . 22. Off island wells shall be converted to coz=on open space under ownership and maintenance by the Homeowner ' s Association at such tint` as oil operations cease or prior to recordation of the Final Map, a revised site plan showing incorporation of those~ areas into the drivel opment shall be approved by the Planning Department and the CC&R ' s shall include provision for annexation of these areas . 23 . Three-- foot maintenance easements shall be provided in Tentative Tract 10069 and 10067 along all zero side yards unless- the Homeowners Association will assume all exterior iaintenance responsibility . 24 . A drainage system maintenance plan for percolation-retention ponds, culverts , channel improvements , and related facilities shall be developed to assure facilities will maintain design capacities to assure continued effectiveness . This maintenance plan shall be approved by the Department of Public Works and California Department of Fish and Game prior to construction . Maintenance of the drainage System other than in the public street system shell be the responsi- bility of the Homeowner ' s Association and/or developer. Tentative Tract 10068 shall be revised to meet minimum parking requirements as set forth in Section 9362 . 16 of the Huntington Beach Ordinances Code. The revised plan shall be submitted to the Planning Commission prior to recordation of the Final Map. 6 . Approve iiesolut,ion of Intention No . 1237 initiating a Precise plan of Street Alignment for 38th Street from Palm Avenue to Garfield Street . Page Sixteen Lttachmcnt&: 1 . Area Map 2 , Draft Ordinance , Zone Change 78-4 3 . Resolution of Intention 1237 4 . Applicant ' s request for Special 13ermiL Approval dated August 29 , 1978 5 . Communication from County Sanitation District dated August 24 , 1978 5 . Communication from California Regional Water Quality Control Board dated September. 7, 1978 7 . Excerpts from Geolo i ca l_rld Hyd rg eolon i gg-1 segs nent and Addendum 1 , dated September 13 ; 1978 8 . Mento from Chiez James E . Gerspach, H. P. Fire Dept , dated September 13 , 1978 9. Communication from Orange County Environmental Management Agency dated August 14 , 1978 10 . Memo from Environmental Council dated August 15 , 1978 11 . Communication front Coastal Cowission dated April 15, 1977 12 . Communication from California Department. of Fish and Game dated October 31 , 1978 . MF:gc 0 44 • CITY CIF HUnflnGTon BEACH DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES ••_, P. O. BOX 190, HUNIINCTON BEACH, CAUFORNIA 9MR 1714) 536•6271 TO; Savoy M. Bellavia, Associate Planner FROM: Environmental Resources) Section DATE: December 26 , 1978 SUBJECT: NEGATIVE. DECLARATION APPLICANT: A. J. hall REQUEST; Re-zone 3. 15 acres from R2-PD-O, R3-00 ROS-0 to R2-PD-O and ROS-0 LOCATION : Northwest of the intersection of Palm Avenue: and Goldenwest St . Background Based on the Staff ' s initial study of this project a Tentative Negative Declaration was published in the local newspaper and posted in the Office of the City Clerk for a 10-day public review period ending December 12 , 1978 and x no comments, the attached comments , were received . Recommendation The! Environmental Resources Section recommends that the City Council approve Negative Declaration No . 78-119finding that the proposed project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment . Mitigation Measures The attached mitigating measures will reduce potential environmental effects resulting from the project_ and are recommended as conditions of approval.. Respectfully submitted , ( " K t>W"-,0L,.a— � s R. Barnes 'distant Planner JRB/s ENVIRONM1:NTAL INFORMAT1011 FORE! L1 Fee - $75.00 P. 0. nox 190 k-16 ataftychua 9 �' Date A. J. HALL CORPOfcATiON Received: ApplicanUAuthorized Agent Project pJ12�-' Number • 01 8305 Vickers. Suite "R" San Diego, Cry. 92111 Department of Origin Mailing ng A ress (71�)565-1162 Ot er Apr scat on Telephone or Permit Numbers : IIINI T7NGTON BEACH COMPANY r p rty Owner 2110 Main St . , Huntington Beach, C.a. 92648 maillng A ress Te ep one (714) 960-4151 NOTE: : To assist the Department of Planning and Environmental Resources in making a determination as to whether a significant environ- mental effect may result from the proposed project, the following information must be supplied. Maps referred to below may be viewed at the City of Huntington Beach Department of Planning and Environmental Resources. 1.0 Project Informa'J on (Please attach Plot Plan and submit photo- graphs o su Sect property) 1. 1 Nature of Project : Give complete description of the proposed project, A change of zone from ROS Recreational Open Space to R2-PD-0 Medium Density Planned Development combinea With oil production encompassing 1.488 acres. n change of zone: from R2-PD-0 Medium Density Planned Development combined with nil production to ROS :tecreational Open Space encompassing 1.669 acres (see attached plat map) . The purpose of the zone change is to effect a boundary adjustment between the existing Seacliff Golf Course and the Sencliff Phase 4 Development proposal , a Planned Residential Development of 531 dwelling units.* . If the project is cormnercial or industrial give a complete description of activities and other pertinent information including but not limited to whether it is neighborhood, city or regional]y oriented, square footage of sales areas (if aany) , estimated employment per shift, any potentially hazardous materials which may be used, etc. NIA ..r.w ww-w r-.---- iA portion of the intended golf course boundaries are toned R2-FD-0. -Similnriv, the contiguous "hale 4 project boundary encorpasses several ROS %or'A areas. The prc7plsed zone charge would , therefore, Flaw appropriate zoning district lines between the golf course and Ph&se 4. •r b . If the project is residential, indicate numbers types and size of units and associated facilities . I N/A i Co. If the project is institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift: avid community f benefits to be derived from the project . i d. .List all types of building materials to be usea for all structures in the project. (Submit detailed elevations if available) NIA 1. 2 Location of project : (Address , nearet:,i street interneeti.ons) ± 300f-' 1w/o Palm avenue and Coldenwest Street intersection 1. 3 omega l Description (Lot, Block, Tract) Portion of Section 3 & 4, ThS., S11W, 34B. (See attached legal description and plat. ) 1. 4 Project land. area (acres ) _3. 1�57 Number of parking spaces yN/A 1 . 5 Square feet of building area NIA Number of floors NJA - 1 .6 What is the percent. and coverage proposed by the project for: a. Building N A b. Paving c. Existing landscaping LIL n�,�,,,�, d. New landscaping NIA -2- General rolatiolM.ps of the project to N;:0xibuisding prcypertieb(Information av able in Planning DepArti� on District Maps) D USE MERINT USE zOVING C;MPAL PLAN resent vacant R-OS planned roposed Community Surrounding north Vacant R3-0 Park Surrounding Vacant R4-0 Planned Community south Surrounding east Golf Course R-05 Planned Community Surrounding Vacant R2-PD-0 Planned Community west 1. 8 What will be the maximum occupancy of all structures proposed within the project? NIA 1. 9 List other public agencies having jurisdiction by law in approval , authorization, certification or issuance of a permit for this project: ❑ O.C . Flood Control District ❑ State Division of Highways ❑ O .C. Sanitation District LJ Corps or Engineers ❑ O.C. Air Pollution Control ❑ City Council District o s Zone © Plattining C�niss:Lon ❑ California Coastal C a -� Conservation Commission 0 board of zoning ]Adjustments ❑ California Regioial Water ❑ Design Preview Moard Quality Control board [] Other: C1 Local 1Agwxy Formation Commission "1- 1. 10 If the projet is commercial , industriall or residential wha+: in the roadway distance in miles from the project to the nearest: a. Shopping Center „1 -41a b . Freeway exit 4 fviles e. 21woent:ary School (refer to Recreation areas Map) I ilia .a. Public park (refer to Recreation Areas Map) 11Z mile e. Scenic Highway (refer to Recreation Paths , Corridors , and Areas Map) 1 mile 2. 0 ExistinSL Environmental Setting of .Proposed Project: 2. 1 seismic: a. What is the distance from the project tau the nearest fe,ult line (refer to fault Map) ? possibly within 500' of 5.Branch b. Is the project site within a designated earthquake hazard area (refer to Earthquake Hazard Special Study Zone Main) ? Los 2 . 2 Drainage and d Control: a. Please describe specifically the volume of drainage and how it will be acconunodat:ed: Refer to "Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report No. 77-5" received by the City on November 22, 1978. b. Is the project within a flood hazard area? no Or natural flood plain? s _ (refer to Flood Plains aFlood Hazard Maps) c. What is the distance from the project to the nearest flood channel? (refer to Flood Control Channels Map) 2 miles d. What is the distance from the project to the neares-. shoreline? Uh �i lam, 2. 3 Topography: a. Does the project site exhibit excessive slope' (refer to Topography:S lope Asap) nn b. ghat is the distance from the project to the nearest. bluff? (refer to Principal Vistas and Features Map) 1/4 Mile eo what is the range and slope of the property as it: now wrists? ± SAX 2 . 4 Land Form: a, to tle property presently graded? No Refer to Grading{ b. Indicate the gross cubic yards of grading proposed so Plan, pg. 11, the acres of land to be graded , the aw o EIX No. 77•-6 { earth to be transported on the s to , and the { amount of earth to be transported aff the s C { ( c. What will be the maximum height and grade of cut or fi Ll after grading is completed? d. Is the surrounding area graded? Now. If so, how Will it affect subject property? 2. 5 Soils : a. Type of soil on the project site? Refer to S.3.2.2 EIR No. 77--6 b. Are there any Peat and/or Organic Soils on the :site? Nam_ (refer to Peat and Organic Soils Map) Ref. S .3.2 .2. EIR No. 77-•6 c. Does the site exhibit moderate to high expansive) soils? (refer to Expansive Soil Distribution rtap) 2. 6 Geologic: Ref. 5.3. 2.2. EIR No. 77-6 r a. Is the site within a high risk geologic problem area? N°�...� (refer to Geotechnical Land Use Capability Map6f. 5.3.2.1. EIR No, 77-6 b. Is the site within an area which has experienced a variable and complex pattern of land subsidence? No (refer to Land Subsidence Map) . Re[ . S.3 .2.1 EIR No. 77-6 2. 7 Historic/Archaeological : a. Could there porsibiy be any objects of historic, aesthetic or archaeological significance on the sit:3? If so, please describe. (refer to Archaeolo i.cal Sitesl Historic Landrk Site$ and Principal Vi ane Features s Rap;) ma No. Ref. to S.3. 7 Eil No. 77-6 —5� 1 2. � Wildlife/Vegetationt a. Does any wildlife use the site for a place to feed, rsest or rest? If so, please list : Ref . to S.3.3 EIR No. 77-6 b. Will any of this wildlife be displaced by the proposed project? .� Ug If so, how? Ref. to S .3.3 EIR No. 77-6 c. Indicate the extent, size and species of plant life per- sently existing on the site. Ref. to S. 3.3 EIR 77-6 d. Indicate the location and area (in acres or square feet) and type of plant life to be removed as a result of the project . Include number type and size of trees to be re- moved . Ref, to S. 3. 3 EIR 77-6 2. 9 Water Quality: a. Does any portion of the project abut or encroach on beaches , estuaries , bays , tidelands, or inland water areas? Refer to a Hydrogeologic Assessment Report Addendum for Seacliff b prepared by Geotechnical Consultants, Inc. (Copy in Addendum to the final EIR 77-6. ) b. Describe how the project will effect nny body of water. See rL.i erence above 2,10 Air Quality : a. If the project is industrial, describe and list air pol- lution sources and quantity and types of pollutants emitted as a result of the project . N/A b. List any Air Pollution Control District •yuipswut zvquimd. M/A -6= . y Eloise: a. Describe any adjacent off-site noise sources (i .e. , airporta, industry, freeways) . Ref.S3.6 EIR 77--6 b. What noise will be produced by the project? if available, please give noise levels in decibel measurement and typical time distribution when noise will be produced. Ref. S .3.6 EIR 77-6 c. How will noise produced by the project compare with existing noise levels? Ref. S. 3.6 EIR 77-6 2 . 12 Traffic: a. Indicate the present traffic volume on arterials and added trips per day from the project . Ref . S. 3.4 EIR 77-6 b. What is the Existing speed limit at the projcc:t location? Ref. S3.4 EIR 77-6 c. Indicate points of egress and ingress to the p:rojecc. Ref. S.3.4 E109 77-6 and Project Plans 3. 0 Public Services and Pacilities : • 3.1 Waters a. Will the project require installation or riplac4mesnt of new water mains? Ref. S. 3.13.1 EIR 77-6 b. Attach a sap shoring the service arear size and lo- cation of new lines. Ref. S.3.13.1 EIR 77-6 e. Please estisate the daily volum in gallons requirod to sires the project. Ref. 3.3.13.1 1ttR 77-6 . -7- 3. 2 Sewers a . Will the project require installation or replacement of new sewer. mains? Ref. S.3 .13.2 EIR 71-6 b. Attach a map showing the service area, size and location of new lines . Ref. S.3.13. 2 EIR 77-6 c. Discuss the capacity required for the project and how this relates to existing effluent volumes within the system. Ref. S.d .13.2 EIR 77•-6 3. 3 1lity Lines: a. Indicate length and type of new offsite transmission and distribution facilities required to serve project. Ref. S .3.13.3 EIR 77-6 b. Do any overhead electrical facilities require relocation? If ©o, please describe facilities. Ref. S.3.13. 3 EIR 77•-6 c. Do existing lines have to be increased in number or size for project? If so, please describe how. Ref. S. 3.13 .3 EIR 77-6 3. 4 Solid Was tmz : A. Describe the type and amount (pounds/day) of solid waste generated by the project. Ref. S.3.13.6 EIR 77-6 Type: Pounds/Day 3. 5 Education: a. For rczidential projects , note primary and secondary sciml diotri -tat Primarys�gef� S. 3.12.4 EIR 77- 6 socondaty: 3• 6 top .ulation Displacement: a. Will any residential occupants be displaced by the project activities? No If not, do not answer question M . b. What is the total number of residents to be displaced? 3. 7 Demolition: a. Will any improvements be demolished or removed by the project? o If so , answer questions b through d. b. Describe briefly the type of buildings or improvements to be demolished by the project. c. List approximate volume of exported material. d. Indicate the location and the distance to the site where exported material will be dumped. 4 . 0 Mitigating Measures: See Section 4 EIR 77-6 4 .1 Are there measures included in the project which may conserve resources (electricity , gas , water or wildlife) ? Please describe. 4. 2 Are there measures proposed in the design of the project to re- duce noise pollution to persons occupying project? If so, please describe . 4.3 Are there measures proposed in the design of the project to reduce noise pollution to persons outside of the project which is caused by noise generated by the project? If so, please describe. . 0 4. 4 Are there measures in the design of the project (architectural treatment and Landscaping) which have been coordinated with design of the existing cumwnity to minimize visual eflict7 If so# please describe. 4. 5 Are there measures or facilities designed into the project to facilitate resources recovery (e.g. solar heating/special insulation etc. ) ? 5. 0 Alternatives: See S.5 EIR No. 77-6 Are there alternatives to the project which may rearlt in a les3er adverse environmental effect? Please explain all project alternatives. 6. 0 Additional Information: (regarding questions above) . If necessary attacg' -Oaltionai sheets. I hereby certify that the information herein is true and accurate to the best of pry knowledge . XLI urb late- a.J " DIR fteiject S4uptrvisor (an behalf of A. 3. Hall Corp. . Applicant) ORDINANCE NO.2.30 y.3 -A AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY AMENDING} SECTION 9061 THEREOF TO PROVIDE FOR CHANGE ON ZONING FROM RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT, COMBINED WITH OIL PRODUCTION TO MEDIUM DENSIT: PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOP- MENT DISTRICT, C014BINED WITH OIL PRODUCTION, ON REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ALONG THE WESTERN EDGE OF SEACLIFF GOLF COURSE , NORTH -OF PALM AVENUE AND WEST OF G3OLDENWEST STREET (ZONE CASE NO. 78--4 ) WHEREAS , pursuarit to the state Planning and Zoning Law, the Huntington reach Planning Commission and Huntington Beach City Council have had separate public hearings relative to Zone Case No. 78-4 wherein both bodies have carefully con- sidered all information presented at said hearings , and after due conjideration of the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission and all evidence presented to said City Council , the City Council rinds that such zone change is proper, and consistent with the general plan , NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does ordain as follows : SECTION 1 . The following described real property located along the western edge of Seacliff Golf Course , north of Palm Avenue , approximately three thousand ( 3000) feet west of Goldenwest Street is hereby changed fro.. ROS-0, "Recreational Open Space District, " combined with oil production, to R2-PD-Op "Medium Densi.ty Planned Residential Development Iistrict, " com- bined with oil production : In the city of Huntington Beach, County of Grange, State of California, those portions o: Section 3, Townahip 6 South, Runge 11 West , S .B .B.M. , as shown on a reap recorded in Hook 51, page 14 of Miscellaneous Maps , records of said county, snare particularly de- scribed as follows : eps L2/22/78 0 Parcel No . 1 : ROS--O to R2-PD-0. Commencing at the ndr er y erminus of that course shown as north 0001128" went, 60 . 76 feet on a map recorded in Book 97, pages 35 through 37 inclusive, of Records of Surveys , reeorda of Orange County; thence along the Existing Use Permit Boun- dary line as shown on said map, north 32031128" crest , 180. 00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence north 4031121" wrist, 177. 12 feet ; thence leaving said boundary south 52055137" east, 17. 08 feet; thence aouth 18042 ► 42" east , 130. 92 feet; thence south 1019144" west , 103. 86 feet ; thence north 32031128" west , 73. 00 feet to the point of beginning. Vontains 0 . 154 acres . Parcel No . 2 : ROS-0 to R2-PD-0, Beginning at the southerly term nus of that course shown as north 15007112" east , 363. 63 feet, on a map recorders in Book 97 , pages 35 through 37 inclusive, of Records of Surveys , records of Orange County; thence along the Existing Use Permit Boundary line as shown on said map, north 15007112" east 363, 63 feet ; thence leaving said boundary line, south 49051143" east , 79. 18 feet; thence south 40146141" west , 114 .90 feet; thence south 49019107" east , 90. 53 feet; thence south 2030118" west , 15 . 00 feet ; thence south 41051137" west , 166 . 71 feet; thence south 12010' 23" east, 211 . 11 feet to the "Existing Use Permit Boundary" line; thence north 22003113" west , 210. 00 feet to the point of b?glnning. Contains 0 . 552 acres . Parcel No . 3 : ROS-0 to R2--PD-0. Beginning at the southeasterly term nus of that course shown as north 59157147" west , 359. 33 feet on a map recorded in Book 97 , pages 35 through 37 inclusive, of Records of Surveys , records of Orange County ; thence along the Existing Use Permit Boundary line as shown on said map, north 59057147" west , 359 . 33 feet; thence north 5*36131" west 89. 24 feet ; thence leaving said boundary line south 63046105" east , 103 .31 feet ; thence south 26°33' 54" west , 44 . 72 feet ; thence south 60007138" east 193 . 74 feet; thence south 46051143" east , 607. 46 feet to the Existing Use Permit Boundary line ; thence along said line north 47054157" west , 49o. 65 feet to the point of beginning. Contains 0. 404 acres . 2. 0 0 Parcel No, 4: R08-0 to R2-.PD-0, t,omrsencing at the sou erly terminus of that certain course sihoirrt as north 5036' 31" want, 585. 78 feet on .a map rec6rded in Book 97, pages 35 through 37 inclusive, of Records of Surveys , records of Orange County ; thence along the Existing Use Permit Boundary line north 5036131" werit, , 168 . 96 to the True :'oint of Beginning; thence north rj°3Eit ll" weat, 209 . 83 friet to a point~ hereinafter referred to as Point A; 'thence leaving said boundary line, sough 85053128" east, 95 . 21 feet; thence south, 134..00 feet; thence south 34039105" west , 82. 66 feet ; thence weat-., 27 . 46 feet to the point of beginning. Contains 0 . 362 acres . 'Parcel No . : ROS-0 to R2-PD-0. Beginning at hereinbefore ed i;cr e Point A; thence along the Existing Use Permit Boundary line north 5*36131" west, :128 . 79 feet ; thence leaving said permit line, east , 10.56 feet ; thence south 0154131" east, 128 . 19 feet to the point of beginning. Contains 0. 362 acres . SECTION 2. The Planning Director of the City of Huntington Beech is her::by directed to change District Map 3 (Sectional IJj.s4ri.c:t Map 3-6-11 ) to incorporate: the: zone change utseribed in Section 1 hereof, and as said district map shall have been amended , the same shall be in full fore and effect and be a part of.the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code . A, copy of said dis- trict map, as amended hereby , is available foil inspection, in the office of the City Clerk. SECTION 3 . Section 9061, District Map 3 thereof, is hereby amended by Zone Case No. 78--4 . SECTION 4 . This ordinance shah take effect thirty days after Its adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this ordinance and cause same to be published within fifteen days after adoption in the Huntington 'Beach Independent , a news- paper of general circulation, printed and published in Huntington Beach, California. 3. PASSED AND ADOPTED by -the Clty Council of the City of Huntington Daaoh at a regular meeting thereof held an thee,,,,,,,,_,,, day of ,..,,s 197 • Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM : dx rn— My- Clerk City Attorney REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED: 01 Cit,j A ministra-tor Acting Planning :creator �1 . ORDINANCE N0.111-S B ;i AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINaTON BEACH AMENDINO THE HUNTINGTON BEAUR ORDINANCE CODE f. BY AMENDING SECTION 9061 THEREOF TO PROVIDE FOR CHANGE OF ZONING FROM MEDIUM DENSITY PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, COM- BINED WITH OIL PRODUCTION, MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTj, COMBINED WITH OIL PRO-DUCTION, AND RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT, COMBINED WITH OIL PRODUCTION TO MEDIUM DENSITY PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, COM- BINED WITH OIL PRODUCTION, AND RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT, COMBINED WITH OIL PROSW .' RUCTION, ON REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ALONG THE WESTERN EDGE OF SEACLIFF GOLF COURSE, NORTH OF PALM AVENUE AND WEST OF GOLDENWEST STREET (ZONE CASE NO. 78-4 ) WHEREAS, pursuant to the state Planning and Zoning Law, 4: the Huntington Beach Planning Commissior. and Huntington Beach ' City Council have had separate public hearings relative to +7 Zone Case N©. 78-4 wherein both bodies Have Carefully con- ` sidered all information presented at said hearings , and after due consideration of the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission and all evidence presented to said City Council. , the City Council, finds that such zone change is proper, and consistent with the general plan, NOW, THEREFORE, the City council of the City of Huntington Beach does ordain as follows SECTION 1. The following described real property located along the western edgy_ of Seacliff Golf Course, north of Palm Avenue, approximately three thousand (3000) feet west of aoldenweat Street is hereby changed from R2- PD•0, "fledium Density Planned Residential District , " combined with oil produc- tion, R3-0, "Medium High Density Residential Districts " combined with oil production, and ROS-Os "Recreational open Space District, " /ps 12/22/78 1 , combined with oil production, to R2-PD-0, "Medium Density Planned Residential Development District, " combined with oil production, and ROSE-0, "Recreational Open Space District, " combined with oil production: In they city of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California , those portions of Section 3, Township 6 South, Aange 11 West, S.B.B.M. , as shown on a map recorded in Book 51 , page 14 of Miscellaneous Maps , records of said county, more particularly de.. scribed as follows , Parcel No. 1 : ROS-0 to R2-PD-0. Commencing at the nor er y'rminus of that course shown as north 0001128" west, 60 . 76 feet on a map recorded in Book 97, pages 35 through 37 inclusive, of Records of Surveys , records of Orange County ; thence along the Existing Use Permit Boundary line as shown on said map, north 32031f28►► west, 180.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence north 40311211' west , 177.12 feet ; thence leaving said boundaH04214211 south 5205513711 east , 17 .08 feet; thence south east , 130. 92 feet ; thence south 1019144" west, 103 . 86 feet; thence north 32031128" west , 73 . 00 feet to the point of beginning . Contains 0 .154 acres . Parcel No. 2 2 : ROS-0 to R2-PD-0. Beginning at the south- erly terminus of that course shown as north 15007112" east, 363. 63 feet, on a map recorded in Book 97, pages 35 through 37 Inclusive, of Records of Surveys , records of Orange Co .nty; thence along the Existing Use Permit Boundary line as shown on said map, north 15*0711211 east, 363.63 feet ; thence leaving said boundary line , south 46°51 ►43" east , 79 .18 feet ; thence south 40046 ► 4111 west, 114 .90 feet ; thence south 4901910711 east, 90 . 53 feet ; thence south 2030118" west, 15. 00 feet; thence south 41*51137" west, 166. 71 feet; thence south 12010123" east , 211.11 feet to the "Existing Use Permit Boundary" line ; thence north 22* 03113" west, 210 . 00 feet to the point of beginning. Contains 0 , 552 acres . Parcel No . ROS-0 to R2-PD-0. Beginning at the south- easter y terminus of that course shown as north 59057147" west, 359. 33 feet on a map recorded in Book 97, pages 35 through 37 inclusive, of Records of Surveys , records of Orange County; thence along the Existing Use Permit Boun- dary line as shown on said map, north 59057, 47" west , 359 . 33 2 . feet; thence north 5°36131" Kent 89. 24 feet; thence leaving said boundary line south 63046105" east , 103. 31 feet; thence south 26033154" west, 44 . 72 feet ; thence south 60007 ' 38" east 193. 74 feet; thence south 46051143" east, 607 . �46 feet to the Existing Use Permit Boundary line; thence along said line north 47054157" west , 490. 65 feet to the point of beginning. Contains 0. 404 acres . Parcel NO, . �: ROS-.0 to R2--PD-0. Beginning at hereinbefore eaeribed Point A; thence along the Existing Use Permit Boundary line north 5036131" west , 128.79 feet ; thence leaving said permit line, east, 10 . 56 feet ; thence south 005413111 east, 128 . 19 feet to the point of beginning. Contains 0 . 016 acres . Parcel No. 6 : R2--PD-0 to ROS-0. Commencing at the north- erly terminus of that course shown as North 4*31121" west, 470. 21 faet on a map recorded in Book 97, pages 35 through 37 inclusive, of Records of Surveys , records of Orange County ; thence along the Existing Use Permit Boundary line as shown on said map , south 403112111 east , 96. 00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence south 4031121 " east, 197 .09 feet ; thence leaving said boundary north 52055137" west , 95 . 72 feet ; thence north 4°28t02" west , 64. 20 feet; thence north 41021153" east ; 99. 62 feet to the true point of beginning . Contains 0. 215 acres . Parcel No. 7 : R2--PD-O to ROS--O. Commencing at the south- My terminus of that course shown as north 5°36131" west, 585 . 78 feet on a map recorded in Book 97, pages 35 through 37 inclusive, of Records of Surveys, records of Orange County; thence along the Existing Use Permit Boundary line as shown on said map, north 5*36131" west , 89. 24 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence north 5036/ 31/1 west 79. 72 feet ; thence leaving said bound- ary line west, 37. 54 feet; thence south, 57 .00 feet ; thence south 63046105" east , 50 . 53 feet to the point of beginning. uc.ntains 0 .064 acres . 3 . 0 Parcel No, 6: R2-PD-0 to ROS-0. Beginning at the northerly terminus of that course shown as 3'44.-th 5°36131" west, 585. 78 feet on a map recorded in Book 97, pages 35 through 37, inclusive, of Records of Surveys , records of t Orange County ; thence along the Existing Use Permit Boun- dary line as shown on said map$ south 5036131" Mast, 78. 21 feet; thence .leaving said boundary line ~feet , 94 . 44 Peet; thence north, 145. 00 feet ; thence north 47027133" west, 65 , 71 feet to a nontangent curve concave north-- westerly having a radius of 900.00 feet , a radial line through said point bears south 2305312011 east ; thence northeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 41114 , 4211 and an are distance of 66 . 68 feet to said permit boundary line ; thence along said boundary line south 28008102" east, 159. 70 feet to the point of beginning. Contains 0 . 357 acres , Parcel No,-2: R3-0 to ROS-0 . Beginning at the northerly erm nus of that course shown as north 5036131" west, 585. 78 feet on a map recorded in Book 97, pages 35 through 37 inclusive, of Records of Surveys , records of Orange County; thence along the Existing Use Permit Boundary line as shown on said map, north 28408102" west , 159. 70 feet to a nontangent curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 900 . 00 feet, a radial lane through said point bears south 2800810211 east; thence leaving said permit boundary line southwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 4014142" and an arc distance of 66. 68 feet ; thence north 47027133" west , 49. 65 feet ; thence north 41011109" east , 53.15 feet ; thence north 66048105" east , 190. 39 feet; thence south 37008148" eest , 82. 80 feet ; thence north 53043133" east , 171. 43 feet ; thence south 3902112i" east, 39. 00 feet; thence south 50038133" west, 45 .00 feet ; thence south 42024109" west , 320. 82 feet to the point of be- ginning. Contains 1 . 033 acres . SECTION 2 . The Planning Director of the City of Huntington Beach is hereby directed to change District Map 3 (Sectional District Map 3-►6-11 ) to incorporate the zone change described in Section 1 hereof, and as said district map shall have been amended , the same shall be in full Porce and effect and be a part 4 . of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. A copy or said dis- trict map, as amended hereby, is available for inspection in the office of the City Clerk. SECTION 3, Section 9061 , District Map 3 there ,!", is hereby amended by zone Case No . 78-4 . SECTION 4. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after its adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this ordinance and cause same to be published within fifteen days after adoption in the Huntington Beach Independent , a news- paper of general circulation, printed and published in Huntington Beach , California . PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the, day of _W- - - - , 197._._• Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: My CleFk City Attorney REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED: t Administrator Acting Planning Director 5. Ftftin ston Beach CO3MPAY 91NMAIMI RIIltT.INM1f'IM$?=NAM.CA&OPOAMI�tRM 11141 Midat January 9, 1979 APPEALS - ZONE CHANGE N0. 78-4 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 00. 78-37 Huntington Bosch City Council 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 Attention: Ms. Alicia Wentworth City Clerk Homrable Mayor and Council Members: Recent discussions at the Planning Commission level regarding our applications for the Seacliff Phase iV Development necessitates further analysis on our part. Therefore, we respectfully request a continuance on the subject appeals until the February 5, 1979 regular City Council meeting. Very tr ly yours, E � nning Coordinator on behalf of A. J. Nall Corporation, Applicant DJEIh PAWS t ae rr 21_, 1978 WIC19 OF 1MIC ant I NG ,/ ZONE CASE NO. 78-4 / NEGATIVE DECIARATIOM No. 78-119 WrICI tS UU1JX GIVU that a public heilarinN gill be hold by the City Cowell of the City of lNmtin;ton beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic UnteRr, NmtiaNton leach, at the hour of 7,.,.7:30 .. ]P. M. , or M roan chirerafter poselble, an Tuesday t1W end day of January , 19,79, for the purr• of ,t"8t&rinN Zone Case 78-4 which consists of approximately 3.15 acres along western edge of the Suatcliff Golf Course, north of Palm Avenue, approximately 3000 feet west of Goldenwest Street. The City Council will be considering one of the following alternatives for Zone Case No. 7'8-+4: 1 . A Change of Zoning on 1 . 488 acres of ROS-O, Recreational Open Space Combined with Oil Production to R2 -PD-0, Medium Density Planned Residential Development Combined with Oil Production, with the condition that a corresponding 1 . 488 acres of land be dedicated by the applicant and allocated to park acreage in an area to be later determined; or 2. A Change! of Zoning as requested by the applicant which includes 1 .488 acres of R05-0, Recreational Open Space Combined with Oil Production to R2-PO-O, Medium Density A lntoros tod a*0" are ri,tod to at a at d haearinN wcproa heir aptal for or er t swirl t see r is tiom way obtaiaod the tiff iey*.,of 0U.6 CitX ''�, CI'!'Y of IN?N!'IiJMG'i't l b M 27101 LIkis me W40tkvrth ty Clerk 0 Planned Residential Developownt combined with Ail Production with the deletion of an 0.362 acre parcel of land defined as Parcel A and 1 .669 acres of R240-0 and R3-09 Medium High Density Residential Combined with Oil Production to RO5-0 or in total . Also for consideration at this time will be Negative Declaration 78-119 in conjunction with said zone change. A legal description is on file in the Planning Department Office. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said zone case, Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk. 2000 Hain Street, Huntington Beach, CA. 1,714) 536-5226. Dated: gecember 19, 1978 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk . WICK TO CUM To SCH9uuL6 FWLJC MMKINC IT TO: CITY LKWI S orricL DATE: rKW: --- LA 4— PLZASZ SCHWULE A PUBLIC HEARING USING THE ATTACHED LEGAL NOTICE ROIL THE DAY DF �, 157�. AP' s are attached AP's will follow No AP's Initiated by: Planning Commission Planning Department Petition ✓ `. J. /4 a 4f, f * Appeal Other Adoption of Environmental Status (x) YES NO Refer to kkv� Planning Department: - Extension for additional information. * If ap eal , please transmit exact wording to he required in the legal . �1.J. wall rZapmM,m M5 V * suits or SC 07" am Dd� j Calif .may 24s, 1976 ON) gnu w m Hawh w 23-231-15 I110 firs Street Dma1O 1 mm O Bluff Cir " 9260rrgban Beach- Calif Imgtml Jkwm hj Calif 92"s 23-181-06 23-232-16 bon 8e+=h clm% at'ry � llorninq T�uda DriveOtt Division ► �� US11�t� St1�'eet 92648 wan �cia f Calif 9412..0 023-231-09 Dwt of tsanep�t�I it. J a A Rizzo 120 So. Wing Stznrt L99M 00mm Bluff Circle Los Anplee, Calif 90052 MmWrqtm Hawh, Calif Attu: Stuff Aasiata nt 92648 Design B 23--731-10 B"Ch b'► ntaiy Ionic n-Musk Sdw01 Diskr:wt P.O. 9= 2140 770 - 17th aStrmt 17550 Gillette Avuvm Mntingbon Beams, Calif r Htarch, Calif 92663 92648 23--2U-1.l AoI - t C Snyder 19"1 Uoesn Muff C.i=Im -- Bmtirn3tm Beech, Calif 926" 23-231-12 Japan V Maser 19851 0oean Bluff Circle Umtfr*m l3mm-h, Calif 92648 23-231-3 3 buNw E Morris 19841 O=M Bluff. Circle ax*Arqtcn bwrbt Calif 92648 23-2U-14 ift, r. J Ryon I%3JL Omm Muff Circle f Cali r RV- r t asw IN TNt; SUPOHOr CCAWrt OF THY S'TATIE Of CALIFORNIA lit and irr. the County of Orange CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH v PLANNING PROOF OF PWOL e�TION ................................. . ........ ... .. . . . . .... ......... ..... . .�_.�.- Pub I ic..H,ea r.inft..No,...78nii9.. .. .. .. .... .. .. . . ak y d Oratye }u• ~ That I am wd at all times herein mentioned wile a citiaen of the 1Mir if, Unikd Statsx,over the age of twenty-one years.and that I am rot a b atM pony is.nw;interested In the above entitled madter. that I ar•n the prhx*ol vierk of the printer of the tsasl w�r tlbirna a mmipliper of general circulathm, published In the City of .,Nunt itgton•Reach.. ....... ......... . . ........ Comely of Orange and which newspt per is published for the die alM yssa M eiasi r �amii som of locoi news and intelligence of a general character, D'�'at ,t w..,y� and which newspaper at all limes berein mentioned had and still s t� boa a beta fide subscription list of paying subscribers,and which ir�r�ilwMha M else asue� taw r has been established.Printed and published at regular M NW.Ive Dw 7a_ its ia ►aY i hoa n W*asld County of()range for a period exceeding one C Avg yew;do the notice.of which the arnesed is a printed copy, has , basis pW*dtad in the regutar and entire issue of said newspaper, � wabe "sir 4rr.r'. and no In any w appdernent thereof,on the following dates,to wit: the tt r. .DfafEtt r.. ..1978 . .. .... ...... . ... .. .. ..... . aAll`dWWW = rim Na 7s i aw w0filif nua .............. .... .. . Tel' Mt - art b►.Mit/ Is jar A1tr w�at. Ma fn t M"I �. 31W d" of u...rr. ............. ...... ...... .. .. ... .. .... ... .....,.. ._ seta Ic I cw*for declare s under penalty of perjury that the foragoirq is ri't tt tnn and correct. w M W.OAIUN Garden Grove +f*"L A `" Do W at ... .. a"be ttw 00-1 4th of Dec b 70 �. Signature v fsw�Flo Cs►r-pair y i, � ray •� �1 •��� ! � 1 r. .. . •,. 1�,�Ss`-.r. ►�'.�rf Il� ,���. � S .fir • r %L wo ——Ar. ow 61 M� _r. _C°�f'[ J x.�./1 - - 7� tnc,W► 1. f j 7 Wit. . - �. � f ASA WricE of FALI4C =MPG ZONE CASE NO. 78-4 / NEGATIVE DECLARATION No. 78-119 WTICC IS 11f1 DY GIVEN that a PUb►lic hearing Mill be held by the City Council of the City of N=tift$ton Ilearh, in the Council Cher of the Civic Center, %wtington Beach , at the hour of 0 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible, on Tuesday the ,� day of January , 19 79 , for the Irutrpome of considering Zone Case 78-4 which consists of approximately 3. 15 acres along western edge of the Seacliff Golf Course, north of Palm Avenue, approximately 3000 feet west of Goldenwest Street. The City Council will be considering one of the following alternatives for Zone Case No. 78-4. 1 . A Change of Inning on 1 „488 acres of ROS-0, Recreational Open Space Combined with Oil Production to R2 -PD-09 medium Density Planned Residential Development Combined with Oil Production, with the condition that a corresponding 1.488 acres of land be dedicated by the applicant and allocated to park acreage in an area to be later determined; or 2. A Change of Zoning as requested by the applicant which includes 1 . 488 acres of R05-02 Recreational Open Space Combined with Oil production to R240-0, ttedium Density Planned Residential Development combined wigs Oil Production with the deletion of an 0.362 acre parcel of land defined as Parcel it and 1 .669 acres of R2-P0-0 and R3-0, Medium High Density Residential Combined with Oil Production to ROS-O or in total . Also for consideration at this time will be Negative Declaration 78•-119 in conjunction with said zone change. A legal description is on file in the Planning Department Office. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said zone case, Further infoirnation may be obtained from the Orrice of the City C1erk. 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach , CA. (114) 536-S226. Dated: December 19, 1978 CiTY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wwtwor•th City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 00 P.O. so 1r0 CALI OMIA OFF1CZ OF THE CITY CLERK January 4„ 1979 Mr, U. S. Eadie Huntington Beach Co. 2110 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA. 92648 Dear Mr. Eadie: The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held Tuesday, January 2, 1979, continued the public hearing on Zone Case 78-4 to January 15, 1978, in order to consider it with the appeal which you had filed on the matter. If you have any questions , please call our office at 636-5226. Sincerely, Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:CB:bt 0 0 • CITY OF HunTinGTon BEACH DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES ...., • F. o. aox 19o. "wriNGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92646 (7141 536-5271 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council ATTN: Floyd G. Belsito, City Administrator FROM: Planning Department DATE: January 11, 1979 SUBJECT: D-le AND RELATED ITEM D-If CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JANUARY 15 , 1979 During the agenda review on January 11 , 1979 , Mr. Belsito requested that I communicate to the Council a recommendation on Zone Change 78-4 and Tentative Parcel Map 78-37 as a follow up to the applicant ' s letter re- questing that both items be continued to the February 5 , 1979 Council meeting. I stated at that time that it would be the Planning Department' s recom- mendation that the City Council take action on Zone Change 78-4 at the January 15 meeting but that the Council could continue action on the tentative parcel map until after the Planning Commission had acted on the remaining applications for the Seacliff Phase IV project. Action on the zone change by the Council at your January 15 meeting would allow the Planning Commission then to incorporate in its action the proper conditions of approval to amend the boundaries of the projects pursuant to such Council action. Without action on the zone change, the Planning Commission would be unsure as to the ultimate boundary and con- figuration that the project should reflect and in its findings would hove to find the project inconsistent with specific plans of the City of Huntington Beach , if approval action were taken prior to the Council' s resolving the zoning for the project. Mr. Belsito also requested that I communicate this reconuendation to the applicant, so that he would be aware of a possible City Council action at your January 15, 1979 meeting. Also in regard to the appeals for the zone change and the tentative par- cel map, I wish to point out that an error was made in the supporting information attached to the staff report. The memo from J. Barnes dated January 5, 1979, Mated that there would be an approximate savings of 118 , 000 gallons of gasoline per year should the City pursue the extension of 38th Street from the project to Garfield Avenue. This figure should be corrected to reflect approximately 35 , 000 gallons saving: by requiring that dedication and improvement. Respectfully submitted, James W. Palin Acting Planning Directo,- JWP:df `� L - , L C. ROBERT A, FISHER ARICA COO[ TICK 1001 0Ovt 6TRttT 9 SUITC 260 TtLICPMONIC •ii•rR�s7 NCWPORT {lACH. CALIPORNIA 92660 November 8, 1978 Mayor Ron Sben)umn Mayor pro' Tem Richard Siebert Councilman Ron Pattinson Councilman John Thomas Councilman Don MacAllister Councilman Bob Mandic Councilwoman Ruth Bailey City Hall P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Re: THE HUNTINGTON LIMITED$ a limited partnership, dba THE SHE- RATON BEACH INN, dba DRIFTWOOD BEACH CLUB., in Bankruptcy No. BK-76-08598 AP Dear Councilpersons ; The undersigned is the duly appointed, qualified and acting Receiver of the above-captioned Chapter XI debtor estate and has b< an operating the facility known as the Huntington Beach Inn since October 8, 1976. ince that time we have been trying to L the property o inatnce same in order to satisfy the c to s in the ca e. We have always been assured by the Ci,x ' s epresentatives that all they wanted was to makes sure we found a ,responsible" operator so that the property would be a "credit" to the city. A previous scale fell through when the buyers could not come up with their financing, despite the fact that the city had approved them are; the "new cmners. 11 We are informed the city approved the placing of a new purchase money trust deed for $2. 6 million. As you blow; know, the property was again sold in March, 1978, this time to Mayer Group, Inc. , for a total sales price of $3, 650, 000.00. There can be: no question but that this purchaser has both the financial and managerial ability to bring this property up to the high standards not by the City and to mAk* all re quireed payments to thin estate. City Council Members November 8, 1978 Pare Two This sale results in a 100% payout to all creditors in the case and will probably return a substant al surplus to the debtor to be divided among itn many limited partners. Therefore, when the City refused to coherent to the assign- ment of the land lease, we were left with no choice but to proceed to litigate the City ' s right to probibit such assignment. If the City prevailed in their argument the creditors in the case would receive next to nooth� inq, and the City would receive the property and all improvements thereon---not quite what we considered fair or equitable. Pcrtunately, the Bankruptcy Judge agreed with us and i enclose herewith a copy of his opinion, dated May 19, 1978. The matter is now on appeal by the City to the Die trict Court audge and argument is set for November 28, 1978. Even before the trial in Judge Phelp' s3 Court, it was announced in Court that Mr. Mayer had been negotiating with Mr. P.illyea and that Mayer had conceded, by way cf settlement, to; 1) Deposit cash or a bond to assure the City of renovations totaling $586,000.00 (down from the City ' 3 original "estimates" of over $1 million) . 2) Deposit "working capital" of $150, 000.00. in addition, the purchaser will be paying over $1 million cash by way of down payment and $48, 000.00 in loan fees to obtain his $2 .4 million loan from Security Bank. Enclosed please find a copy of said bank' s ctvmitmont letter dated Aptil 25, 1978. Hc7waver, at the time of trial, (and to this day, I suppose) it was announced to the Court that the City would not consent to the assignment unless: 1) Mayer pays a $35, 000.00 "transfer fee, " and 2) Mayer does not borrow more than $2.1 mill-,.on against the property. i find it difficult if not impossible to understand these requirement&. Fixat, there is no contractual or reasonable requirement for a "transfer fee. ' It has been explained that this Is to reimburse the City for their "expenses, " I respect- fully suggest that you have probably spent a great deal none City Council Members November Be 1978 Page Three than that on outside consultant and attorneys ' fees just insisting on this "requirement" of a transfer fee. 2 find it even more difficult to comprehend how you and your lle.xpertsff can tell Mr. Mayer how much he should borrow. if he and Security Bank see fit -to risk their money, why should the city involve itself in Mayer 's business? if you don' t receive your lease payments you just wipe out the bank and Mayer under the rights given to you in your lease. We (Mr. Mayer and myself) have been endeavoring to see you for several months; but all we receive are comments that the "matter is in litigation" and you cannot talk to us. Mr. Mayer is required to meet exclusiv!IX with Mr. pollyea. Is it possible that Mr. pollyea would like to see the City acquire this property so that he can operate it for you? This seems to be the only possible reason for the information we have received recent) that__you have not been LOME Mr. Ma er sr commitment from ecurifi NA. We are informed t at you were to Mayer -had applied or a loan from Glendale Federal Savings and Loan and had been truned down. on the contrary, it was Mr. pollyea who told Mayer he (pollyea) had obtained such a loan for Mayer. This, of course, was not true. in conclusion, w© only want to be satisfied that the council has the whole story, as it seems so incredible that the City has taken such a position in light of the facts. if this estate prevails in the appeals Mr. Mayer would not be required to make the concessions he already has for improvemente, etc. If the city truly wants to see the property sold. to a "responsible" operator, we have already more than met that criterea. If, however, the city wants the property and will not approve any assignment, then I wis], you would just say so; and we can stop wasting our time and effOXt trying to be reasonable. City Council Members November 8, 1978 pa5e Pour I apologixo for the length of this letter, but I assure You I had to work to keep it this brief. Sincerely, Robert A. Fisher, Receiver for the Estate of Huntington Limited RAF z dt Encs, cc: Shutan and Trost Henry Casden P. S. I arr� informed just today that despite the completion Of almost $60, 000. 00 worth of paving on the mobile home park per you "specifications, ,decline to came out and in you (the city) either xefuse or spect the work to verify whether or not it meets your "specifications. y� SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL BANK 5IXlll XNOLLS OFFICE. "36 ATLANTIC AVE..LONG 5 EACH,CALIFC RNIA•{3131590.3156 MAKING AOORESS.- POST OFFICE SQX 71e7, LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90l07 . April 23, 197"d "re Pobert L. &7er, President Mayes Construction Corp. 8121 E. Florence A- moue fey, Czlifo=1is 90240 Tamar Bob 7o evofl= oar cvawe=satica tcZQY, va 8" p1+al004 to adra.ae you that we will &=—..smd you a loan of $2.400#040 an the "H=tingtoo Beach ?-ropsrt,10a fibJett loan is for a period of five Tura vith a too yeas a=zti=zt'.n achedula. F.atb hill float at 31 over our prime rat* and Is lacy foe of 2% i3 :04Pixmd. OL= nasal outstOA- in v will be zubja-A to a first deed of tr-wt on the lwm&hold Praperaar. labs as we suatieai~d, om coraitz=t 3a subject to our various clnaltl4antn and restrictions which will require ti=ly balastc• #beats znd pxvfit " leas details on the operation and ocher controls U--hich we may feel neeass-ary fzvm timm to rim- Again, Dsab, it is our pl"wirs to participalcfl with 7" in Amther leftture XA look forward to #loch sudcase irk 8vntingt" �• . Please acknowledge script on duplicate att chade Y tz' 7• . 3aah��arsnon P C hsaident t�0.r tblg Acknowledged and ,accepted • ?Sayer Conistruction Corporation A-t- Mayer i 2 CONFORMS-D Filled MAY 1 F CLERK:U. S. (:001S."'T 3 CENTRAL DISTRICT OFCALIFVURNIA BY DEPUTY 4 5 6 7 $ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 In Re ) Bankruptcy No. BK-76--08599 AP 12 THE HUNTINGTON LIMITED, ) a Limited Partnership, ) MEMORANDUM OPINION 13 dba THE SHERATON BEACH )' INN, dba DRIFTWOOD BEACH � 14 CLUB, ) 15 Debtor. ) 16 The debtor is a limited partnership against which an 2.7 involuntary petition in bankruptcy was filed in June, 1976. The Y6 debtor then filed a petition for an arrangement under Chapter XI 19 of the Bankruptcy Act in the pending involuntary proceedings 20 pursuant to 5321 of the Bankruptcy Act and Rule 11•-3 (b) 21 The debtor ' s only, assets consist of an assigned Ion term 22 ground lease from the City of Huntington peach upon which 1 ase- 23 hold estate several different businesses are being cond ted. 24 A large mobile home park has been constructed upon part of the 25 property by the lessee. The debtor subleases sites to Some 239 2a tenants in this mobile home park. A two-story motel has been 27 erected by the lessee upon another portion of the property. The 28 motel consists of 144 roomer in three buildings . Upon the property