Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutStudy Session - Potential Conflict Between Vacant Commercial i • CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTING304 BEACH TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Melanie S. Fallon, Community Development Director / VIA: Ray Silver, Acting City Administrator SUBJECT: VACANT INFILL PROPERTIES IN DOWNTOWN AREA DATE: February 2, 1998 The attached information is intended to supplement the information forwarded to you on vacant commercial infill properties, dated January 28, 1998. It, too, was prepared at the request of Councilmember Garofalo. The table provides summary information on vacant properties in the downtown area, most of which are designated for visitor-serving commercial-or mixed use development. The properties are depicted on the attached map. Staff does not recommend any land use changes for these properties. Attachments: 1. List of Vacant Infill Properties in Downtown Area 2. Map Depicting Location of Infill Properties 3. Downtown Districts Map 4. Analysis of Downtown Mixed-Use Districts dated 11/28/95 cc: Howard Zelefsky, Planning Director Mary Beth Broeren, Senior Planner Herb Fauland, Senior Planner � �y VACANT INFILL PROPERTIES41 IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA h W Surround fnt ses Parcel Parcel Size Zoning General PlanLLocation (square feet) Designation Designation North South West 1 PCH between 13,750 SP-5 MV Alley & P C H Abandoned Hotel Seventh & (Residential) Residential Structure & Oil Eighth Facility 2 PCH, east of 2,750 SP-5 MV Alley & P C H Parking Lot & Street & Liquor Seventh (Residential) Residential Donut Shop Market 3 PCH, west of 2,750 SP-5 MV Alley & P C H Parking Lot& Street& Liquor Sixth (Residential) Residential Donut Shop Market 4 Sixth west 2,937 SP-5 RH Residential Alley & Street & Vacant Oil Facility side, north of (Residential) Coffee Shop Lot alley 5 Sixth, west 2 937 SP-5 RH Residential Residential Street& Vacant Alley & side, south of (Residential) Lot Residential Walnut 6 Sixth, east 14,687 SP-5 MV Residential Alley & Alley & Parking Street& side north of (Visitor Serving Vacant Lot Lot Residential alley Commercial) 7 Sixth east 8,812 SP-5 MH Street& Residential Alley & Auto Street& side south of (Mixed Use) Residential Shop Residential Olive 8 Third, east 5,875 SP-5 MV Residential Medical Clinic Residential & Parking Structure side, north of (Mixed Use) Dirt Lot Walnut 9 Second, east 5,875 SP-5 MH Residential Residential Residential Residential side, north of (Mixed Use) Olive 10 Walnut, corner 8,224 SP-5 MV Condo Complex Alley & Dairy Street& Motel Oil Facility of First (Visitor Serving Queen Commercial) Page 1 of 1 MIND • wimp aHHHHUR Nllllllggq Gllilll 1111111 agaNaNN IlgnnHllN Illmgit�A ' 1111111 IIUNI N � qqq mlm I"DO NIIN111 illllli aaaaaaa � N ■MPH ggllilllllq agNNlll MINOR 111111110 INNgNNN qN�U � N N �q IgNNIIII aagilNNN NagglNID go Elio I � aNNaIINR gNMlNIM aIINNNaN Na �aIIN�� ggli 11I� Illgl IRO III NI�IIgNN pNNgaNN noun a = N NIIINIIINN INalallla NIfNINNN In,IINN'up I HummaN ��IN �IaNNNN gaNNiglllN ease �aNaNaN gNNNIIaN NIgNIIINq NNNNNNN NNNNNNN111101111101 = Nlip NNNOUNN NaaaaaN millolla aaa�aN Ill 11lga uNMq NN�N��q NmNl aN HtIMUON s. ; ��I� I� �INaaaa NaN��N� ��INai� ��' �► .'� �� � '�,��,; NNNall�q � �� � ,�� ,� ����► ■ lad �Il�q NNaaIINN � � . ��'��� �� � ��� ���� . Illllllq Iilallllllla glllaunum @ ■ NI Nallialllli NNE �qi� �� � a01Nlallq N minim allaab� �� IPN(Illil �NNII� II11111, IIIIN �1NINNa Milli 11111D1 il� ■ •�IIIIIINIIillllll � ���'. �����,� �� ��' �� ��� �'j � L 11 hN �u 1llIL'IE HH IE Hu T uu UH IE H i ILlO�]�IlmOJ(llf�[➢[ll�J� WipC� �� o 80B u JIM 5 1111111 IUL -1111 IUUUUI::: PACIFIC OCEAN C9) ,. ^ PLANNING INGTON BEACH CALIFORNIA u oIsraIcrs BY NUMBERNp• •,.�<P .I.o�,..�.ne DOWNTOWN SPECIFY^ pLpN 4•"fe CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members VIA: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator FROM: Melanie S. Fallon, Community Development Director+` DATE: November 28, 1995 SUBJECT: Analysis of Downtown Mixed-Use Districts BACKGROUND: As directed by the City Council, staff has reviewed and analyzed possible changes to the mixed-use districts in the Downtown Specific Plan (DTSP). The DTSP identifies three distinct areas as mixed-use; District Four: Mixed-Use; Office/Residential, District Five: Mixed-Use; Commercial/Office/Residential, and District Six: Mixed-Use; Office/Commercial/Residential. The three areas total approximately 52 acres. The mixed-use designation is intended to encourage the maximum flexibility for the uses allowed in each district. The following is a brief description of each district: 1. District Four: Mixed-Use: Office/Residential. This District flanks the Downtown core area, separating the area along Main Street from the outlying areas which are primarily residential. The District boundary includes the half blocks on the northwest side of the Main Street core - area from 6th Street to the alley between 6th and 5th Streets; and from -`' the alley between 3rd and 2nd Streets to the alley between 2nd and 1 st Streets, between Walnut and Orange Avenues. The purpose of the District is to provide a transition zone between the d existing residential areas to the commercial Main Street corridor. As a result, mixes of office and residential uses are permitted (see Attachment No. 1). ya' (g:U95hf1) Downtown Mixed Use November 28, 1995 Page Two 2. District Five: Mixed-Use: Commercial/Office/Residential. This District includes the blocks on either.side of and including Main Street, and constitutes the oldest commercial area in the City. The District boundary includes the area from the alley between 6th and 5th Streets to the alley between 3rd and 2nd Streets and the 1 st Street frontage (on the northwest side) from Walnut to Orange Avenues. The purpose of the District is to re-establish the area as the Downtown for the City by creating a more urban atmosphere, encouraging relatively higher intensity development with viable commercial, office and residential uses (see Attachment No. 2). 3. District Six: Mixed-Use: Commercial/Office/Residential. This District encompasses the area north of the Downtown core and includes the public library. The District boundary consists of the blocks located between 6th and Lake Street from Orange Avenue to Palm Avenue. The purpose of the District is to provide a location for neighborhood commercial enterprises to serve the surrounding residents, as well as office space, public facilities and residential uses. The mixed-use node will anchor the inland end of the Main/Pier corridor (see Attachment No. 3). ANALYSIS: Staff focused their review and analysis on Districts Four and Five. Staff did not analyze District Six because staff felt District Six should continue as a mixed-use district. The district (No. 6) requires commercial along Main Street (up to Acacia Avenue) with the provision of residential above. As indicated, District No. 6 is the mixed-use node that will anchor the inland end of the Main/Pier corridor. Staff did review Districts Four and Five for possible changes to their mixed-use designations and locations. As part of this review, staff walked the two districts to see the physical development pattern of the area and to analyze possible changes to the districts. District No. 4 is primarily developed with residential uses which includes detached single-family, duplexes, and apartments. It is important to remember that District Four is the transition zone between the commercial core (District No. 5) and existing residential in the Downtown. The district (No. 4) allows office with residential uses and/or only residential uses. (g:1995hf1) Downtown Mixed Use November 28, 1995 Page Three The district does not require only a office/residential mix. The district is flexible in the type of development it permits (residential or office/residential) and should ensure a gradual coordinated change in terms of heights, scale and uses between the Downtown core and adjacent areas. District Five is the primary commercial core area and requires a mixed-use scenario. The district (No. 5) serves as the link between the pier and District No. 6. This pattern of land use is proposed to create an urban atmosphere for both day and night activities in the Downtown core area of Main Street. As such, the district permits residential only in conjunction with commercial development. This district is very clear on the mix of commercial and residential and the location of the commercial component. This district includes Main Promenade (parking structure), Second Block Rehab, Post Office Block, and Third Block West. In reviewing this district, staff reviewed the blocks on the west side of Fifth St., east side of Third St. and the west side of First St. These areas are developed with a mix of uses which includes small scale commercial, offices, auto repair, detached single family residential, duplexes, and apartments. The periphery areas of District Five are possible locations for changes to their designation. This is due to the existing development, land ownership and lot sizes. One concern noted by staff to the possible changes to District No. 5 is the reduction of commercial opportunities in the Downtown. If the Downtown core (Main St.) continues to improve it will put pressure on the periphery for future opportunities. The possible spillover onto the adjacent blocks (west side of Fifth St., east side of Third St., west side of First St.) could occur. Staff has received recent inquires from property owners to the possible commercial development in these areas. If changes are recommended to this district, the periphery areas should be removed from District No. 5 and changed to District No. 4. This would expand the transition area of .District No. 4 while reducing the . Main St. commercial'core of District No. 5. Downtown Parking Master Plan The Downtown Specific Plan Village Concept included the Downtown Parking Master Plan (DTPMP). The parking plan is based upon a shared parking concept. Shared parking in effect allows one space to serve two or more individual land uses without conflict and relies on the variations in the peak parking demands for different uses. In other words, parking demands will fluctuate in relationship to the mix of uses by hour, day of week and season. (g:\995hfl) Downtown Mixed Use November 28, 1995 Page Four The proper mix will create an interrelationship among different uses and activities which results in a reduction of the demand of parking. The DTPMP anticipates a total development scenario of approximately 450,000 to 500,000 square feet of commercial activity within the commercial core area of the Downtown. The area which encompasses the DTPMP is identified on the attached area map (see Attachment No. 4). As can be seen by the area map the DTPMP focuses on the core area along Main St. This includes parts of District No. 3 (Visitor-Serving Commercial), and parts of two mixed-use districts; District No. 5 and District 6. Only those parts of each district which fall within the DTPMP area are allowed to take advantage of the shared parking concept. This is primarily due to the central location and proximity of the public parking (structure) in the area. Those districts not included are required to provide 100% of the code required commercial parking. Also, all residential development is required to provide 100% of the code required parking. CITY COUNCIL QUESTIONS: Council Member Dave Garofalo submitted a list of specific questions/concerns regarding the mixed-use designations in the Downtown area. The following responses are provided. Question: Are these secondary uses (location) suitable for commercial operations? Answer: Yes; the mixed-use districts in their current locations within the Downtown area are suitable for commercial operations. This is because of their proximity to the Main St. core area, their varied intensity of development, varied development standards, and varied list of permitted uses tailored for each district. Question: Are the parcels located in this area served by the Parking structure? Answer: Yes and no; some of the Districts (3 & 5) are better served by the parking structure than others. District Nos. 3 & 5 are better served because of their long term parking needs for visitor serving type uses (theaters, restaurants, etc.). District Nos. 4 & 6 are not as conducive to the availability of the parking structure. This is based upon the distance needed to walk and the types of uses. (g:�J5hf1) Downtown Mixed Use November 28, 1995 Page Five District Nos. 4 & 6 have different parking needs. They are short term neighborhood serving type uses with quick turn over. Question: Do these predominately 25 foot frontages accommodate commercial or residential uses. Answer: Residential; however, staff has seen some creative commercial development concepts on narrow lots that would accommodate commercial/office on the ground floor with residential above. Question: Even with revisiting the use of"Eminent Domain" and therefore the potential for lot consolidation, should this present zoning be reevaluated? Answer: Maybe; even though the DTSP went through a long review and analysis and the Downtown appears to be improving, economic times remain uncertain and circumstances may warrant a re-analysis of the mixed-use areas to continue the improvement of Downtown. SURVEY: City staff sent out a survey to the property owners in District Five. A total of 71 property owners were mailed a survey that requested a reply to three questions (see Attachment No. 7). Six responses to the survey were received. Of the six responses; three requested residential zoning and three liked the mixed-use zoning, while three had plans for development and three did not. SUMMARY: The Downtown Specific Plan Village Concept was recently approved (April 17, 1995) after a four and one half year review. The review looked at the entire specific plan area but focused it's attention on the downtown core area and the implementation of the Village Concept. It should be pointed out that the possible staff recommended boundary changes to the mixed-use districts are the exact scenarios presented in early discussions of changes to the DTSP (Village Concept). The suggested boundary changes were discussed at length at the City Council Downtown Subcommittee level. The suggested changes were not made because of input from property owners who expressed plans for commercial development. (gA995hf1) Downtown Mixed Use November 28, 1995 Page Six The subcommittee recommended to the City Council that the districts remain in their current boundary configuration. The plan was approved without boundary changes to Districts Four, Five, and Six. A factor for Council consideration is the current staff workload. Due to current staff levels and the fact that two major projects are being processed (Bolsa Chica, General Plan Update), the possible processing of an amendment to the specific plan would require a possible shift in processing priorities. Current processing time is estimated to be between 12 - 18 months (includes Coastal Commission hearings). At this point, staff would suggest the proposed changes to the configuration of the districts be analyzed as part of the next review and amendment to the DTSP. This may occur when the proposed timeshare use is presented for District Nine. Other modifications may also result as a result of the implementation of the recently adopted DTSP. RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending analyzing changes to two mixed-use districts (4 & 5). The analysis would include possibly removing areas of District Five (commercial core) and expanding the areas of District Four (transition area). The analysis would look at reducing the mixed-use commercial/office/residential area and possibly allowing only office/residential uses. To accomplish this, the district boundaries between Four and Five would be reconfigured (see Attachments 5 and 6). District Four would be expanded and permit the continued residential development on the perimeter of the Downtown or allow a office/residential mix. COUNCIL DIRECTION: The City Council should direct staff to do the following: 1. File a City initiated Zoning Text Amendment/Zoning Map Amendment to analyze and make recommendations to possibly modify Mixed-Use Districts Nos. 4 & 5 in the Downtown Specific Plan, or 2. Do not file a City initiated Zoning Text Amendment/Zoning Map Amendment to analyze and make recommendations to possibly modify Mixed-Use Districts Nos. 4 & 5 in the Downtown Specific Plan, or 3. Direct staff accordingly. (9:\995hf1) Downtown Mixed Use November 28, 1995 Page Seven ATTACHMENTS: 1. District Four 2. District Five 3. District Six 4. Area Map - Downtown Parking Master Plan 5. Suggested changes to District Four 6. Suggested changes to District Five 7. Survey letter dated October 23, 1995 xc: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator Ray Silver, Assistant City Administrator/Economic Development Director Linda Niles, Senior Planner Herb Fauland, Associate Planner Stephen Kohler, Project Manager (g:NMhi1) PECAN ORANGE i OLIVE F: LZI IL > J 10 Liu Z PACIFIC COAST HWY. PAC FlC OCLAN ,s, DISTRICT 4! DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN HUNnNG ON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION PECAN ORANGE .> ::. ..: OLIVE Q WALNUT . . z 1- Z (D Z L7J EL I LN L DE u O N L N)Lu N.. PACIFIC COAST HWY. MOM OCEAN LiNil/ yf.�,ta1 DISTRICT 5 _ y R � DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC `PLAN HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DPASION PALM ' ACACIA .. .{t�;�';aR.: :�" •tom.`,•:} PECAN ': }�tft;:iiYv:. a}{'ry,:;:ti•:}},•... .tf•"�:{�•:tjtYf: a•v:{:v �JJvpa. •• •tiihi+lCW�iYej{A{}Giyfttiy. :;�j'ct+h.•�`:;-j�:.1v: •.h(i :.�i.::;}.,.faaC?23Dn<??o:{ra. �2`xkt� ORANGE 01 cn 0 25 V7 N N y t J N N H WALNUT Wz z = I z 57( ? a Q (---� y to a' LL PACIFIC COAST HWY. •m DISTRICT 6 DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC' PLAN LAN HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DMSION LEGEND PARKING MASTER PLAN � AREA A. Main Pier Two B. Pierside Pavilion/Pier Colony � / C. Second Block Rehab. ✓ ' ' D. H.B. Promenade y\� E. Third Block West Amy F. Post Office Block / AREA 2 G. Town Square ✓;j; �� H. Forth Block East sT , SFr I. Art Center Block Fl \ ORANGE - - - AVE. i �� c~jy 'S�i. t= `??s"o•''sF,cf i.•: �I F.: cS�, OUVE AVE. Fr\ L .0 t... � LJ� cV -- --- - WALNUT AVE-.-.... - - - - ---- - ---------------- _ 'SP' 53.E?•'':;-.r�n'4': ,::;:i:> :` ?{<�; `t4�•-''::. -4;t2::C:: :•;•..':::• •.t•:'':NiY'•of}:f,i`•H::i PMcM L I I l -I I- `l CN7`I t s7: _ — ( E- TJLLj NIN'ri-i sT. Z'v E n 'CI GITri ST. .SCVLNTII ST. O SIXTI 1 ST.7o ►�d Q py � _), • • • • • • • • • • • • • •CA p t*t n y H MAIN ;ST. • THIRD ST. 1t1 SECOND, ST. • 1 :• • • : •: •: C'Uts-r ST. :. .TENTH -ST. .. CCC C� •� � o b .:-NINTlI SI'. � Jam► -'C—fin C a x IL9 z fi lclTrl-t� ST' M O J,C) H � ' o `SIXTH ST. � » CC C______ .1 C C C m D Fin!-.I ST. y MAIN S1.: THIRD ST. \ SECOND* ST. .. . . . . .. . . . . . . • rt>ts�'�'.•s•r. �� •�� C' City of Huntington Beach w 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Building 536-5241 Planning 536-5271 October 23, 1995 Subject: Survey of Development Options/Plans in the Downtown Specific Plan Dear Property Owner, The city of Huntington Beach is surveying and soliciting information from property owners located in Downtown Specific Plan District No. 5 (Mixed-Use, Commercial/Office/Residential)as to their future development plans. The information from the survey will help the city identify the future of mixed-use in these areas of the specific plan. Specifically, the city would like to know the answers to the following questions: 1. Do you have any development plans for your property? 2. If you are planning to develop, can you provide the city with an estimated time frame (1, 5, 10 years)? 3. Are you satisfied with the current zoning of your property (Mixed-Use, Commercial/Office/Residential) which requires a mix of office or commercial and residential? If you could choose your zoning what would it be? Pease provide a written response by no later than November 6, 1995. All responses should be sent to Herb Fauland, Associate Planner, at the address above. Your cooperation is greatly appreciated! Sincerely, Melanie S. Fallon Community Development Director (G:1095M) J CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION cafl HUNTI OCH MACH TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Melanie S. Fallon, Community Development Director�'� � . VIA: Ray Silver,Acting City Administrator SUBJECT: VACANT COMMERCIAL INFILL PROPERTIES DATE: January 28, 1998 At the request of Councilmember Garafalo, staff has assembled a list of vacant commercial infill properties that are adjacent to residentially developed sites. The purpose of the list is to evaluate the properties as candidates for zone changes. The concern is whether or not development of these properties as commercial uses would be compatible with the surrounding residential uses or if they would be better suited to residential development. The catalyst for this request was the proposed gas station/convenience market at the corner of Goldenwest and Pacific Coast Highway. Staff is currently processing a general plan amendment and zone change to convert this property, and others in the area, from commercial to residential due to compatibility concerns. There are 11 properties on the list, one of which is the Goldenwest and PCH site(No. 9). Staff believes that only four of the properties warrant consideration for possible zone changes and general plan amendments (Nos. 6, 7, 9, 10). Property Nos. 9 and 10 are located on PCH and staff is currently working on changing their designation. Property Nos. 6 and 7 are located on Ellis and Newman,respectively, and are potential candidates for land use designation changes. The remaining seven properties are better suited to commercial development because they could be consolidated with adjacent commercial properties and make a more viable site or are too small for residential development. Attachments: 1. List of Vacant Commercial Infill Properties 2. Maps Depicting Location of Infill Properties cc: Howard Zelefsky, Planning Director Mary Beth Broeren, Senior Planner STD.( 17y SE -S ` o N 1/28/98 VACANT COMMERCIAL INFILL PROPERTIES ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES Parcel Location Parcel Size General Plan Zoning Recommend for (square feet) Designation Designation Zone Change 1. Beach Blvd., west side; 34,300 CG CG No; north of Ellis Parcel is L-shaped and wraps around developed commercial use,would be suitable for lot consolidation 2. Beach Blvd., west side; 6,900 CG CG No; north of Yorktown Parcel is small and better suited for lot consolidation for commercial use 3. Beach Blvd., west side; 38,100 CG CG No; north of Yorktown Lot consolidation with lots (frontage on Williams) that front on Beach Blvd. would make development more feasible and allow for better buffer from residential uses to the west. 4. Beach Blvd., east side; 19,800 CG CG No; south of Warner Parcel has good street frontage and commercial uses to south and north; not suitable for residential 5. Edwards, west side; 5,600 CG CG No; north of McFadden Parcel is land-locked behind commercially developed property; not large enough for viable residential use. 6. Ellis Ave., south side; 76,700 CG CG Potentially; behind Town& Country Site not easily integrated into existing commercial development to the west and is large enough for a residential infill project. Note: Includes properties directly abutting or separated by an alley from residentially developed properties. Does not include vacant commercial infill properties which have approved entitlements and are in plan check. Page 1 of 2 1/28/98 VACANT COMMERCIAL INFILL PROPERTIES ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES Parcel Location Parcel Size General Plan Zoning Recommend for (square feet) Designation Designation Zone Change 7. Newman Ave., north 18,500 CG CG Potentially; side; west of Beach Parcel large enough for Blvd. residential development. Possible consolidation with commercial lot to east would result in long,narrow lot not as conducive to commercial project. 8. Newman Ave., 9,500 CG CG No; south side; west of Lot consolidation with lot to Beach Blvd. the east that fronts on Beach Blvd. would make corner property more commercially viable; busy intersection with medical uses on west side of Beach Blvd. 9. PCH, between 39,400 CG DTSP-#1 Yes; Goldenwest and 22nd Parcel has residential uses to the east and south. 10. PCH, between 17th and CG DTSP-#1 Yes; 18th Parcel has residential uses to the east and south. 11. Slater Ave., south side; 7,100 CG CG No; west of Beach Blvd. Lot consolidation with lot to the east that fronts on Beach Blvd. would make corner property more commercially viable;parcel not easily integrated with mobilehome use to the west. Note:Includes properties directly abutting or separated by an alley from residentially developed properties. Does not include vacant commercial infill properties which have approved entitlements and are in plan check. Page 2 of 2 —ANNING ZONING DM 39 SI TIONA-L DISTRICT MAP 35-5-1I NOTE:ALL 0111[NSION]•.1 1.r[[T. ANT x CITY OF ADOPTED MpRCX 7 1E •O bww6 ANT RI ONT Or M•T 13 F.11[p Tp CITY COUNCIL �;R7QININCE NQ 7 TO TN[ G[w 1(W Or SUGN.aNT OF M•T "�.S..D`fa ` 7S-Y9 /CCWLD CN--"9• �s`'�LR 43E 99—"4' ® auwrao e�us.urcw f.t•f0 1 1f0 t•1a•13)]-7 1a]• n•]•a. N•N f3•e 10.3•f0.2\•27 7" :1331 T3-t q]7 11m., sm. ful ® rLavK00[vtl0•YE4T b3T.KT 11•)•f0 1>DAJ Tf\ q•a•13 73.4 674 ae-•) e1•N 193 © KaOL-YAL•O.CYLTY..6 pgT.KT 1 nN0�3.(N •O• II•033 tan 1\)e 1.21-e1 M74f22fN a•al f \Jf 7.1.1]-13-1 Ills P!••1 \i-1 290• © fIb6T11uL b\TKT HUIVTII�IGT01� BEACH a10 1.1.1. n•11 qA a. v-II !11 LI\NT INp07T.1•L DIST.KT II.4 a1 11t `mqq n•11•A T3•!3 p1 e_,j._rr3•f1-:rot �-�'� � "• a-s r„i »e In!•i ::=o� f0 � � c=*\ 'NI 2usIN[ss oNT.ICT t i ;ii o-1\•1.rr1.•3 Ifb O L0+aK n Kfo[NnIL oarKG1 I4•Q 2f] sr T•{•fa ran foal ® OrfC[•r•WLSYOwg bfTNKT ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA a•{. .3pi,p . S•T-TT T{-2aa :na wm r.OGN Dt K70 WC as.cT 1•n-aa S.t 11ax 7•x-T7 r•CCOw1 zn. '� IICOnr•NON 0[N•T K3O(NTNL b]T.KT q 4 1 Y.'� 3,' wit ir1•izil Ii�Je wrp.4 A...1*C 7 •N•{! t!•II i00t KA•13 Sr13.1..3e10 • KT.Kr[0 wNWfCTWIM bfT.KT f.z•af {{azl szz ta.1•vial..u•e =1 '""T r•C•. E$GTC.t•TION•LI bs 10•n•10 10.10 N3. ,.A-so so.. S.N 7.1•T TO•!T NJa � CCwwuNir♦I•GLRKSIGVKI Ogt.KT a•1{•11 )1-X q{2 1.21•a0 \0-f 2..• wuLfirL[f1wK1.[710[wC[0131.IC1 1•I1•lt 11-11 IfOf 1'11-a1 a0•n 1.12 ••3.1t )2•a 11.0 3•a•\2rMQ1R•], (. 17•I/2•\o{! I.1•It 12.13 Se.t - t(q..[ 0 DMKLMN[ N0T I]•q•a2 as.. COwNw(0V 'l ON,1. 2aN C0wf1w[0Nbp 'T*w21 fa ] civic OaTKTa3 R w 4•1-72 72•4 11.1 }:}:Y; Li:?{ iui P7L7] IKOU PLAN Or 3T.EtT ILKNKNT TALBERT .2.3 *as ]-a•urNNr1..32N ` "--�`c sr.[Er L_ .2.1 /z+• 1a '+ AVE. e x.x3 ss1» MI-CD 'l '( RP.O_ s I E (0)-MI MI-A OIR2-PD: R3-PD k4_: c y (w) .r MI-CO MI-A � I i j o• so m R4 SR ..•1R3-PD C F—R --------------" M I—C D = .: Rom: R C 4 ' ' MI .._ • , R11: L. tXa:r:•,�:^:>~ c�NiRa -,.._ � 1 "R4-SR 11 —Incp_ol--I cNN (MI—CD) rl: RI Inc -�- R C 2 I CF-R RI ' ' I`j 31120 K 1S Rl N R1 OR J (RA-0—CD) _ �JJ C 2 30 MI—CD M I MI r �= ONTgW10 OR RI 2: If RI RI C F-C u __�ouceeC OR RI R1 -!t�ecs[:aTstp2aaa.=aa M1 R3 q 11 ---------:_ c -----NNW R1 R1 •• 3cw`tDRr_ ^ _p t CF—C a pLeERTp (RA-0-CO) S •o Pc "n MI-CD RI RI V RI 3 RI --- CF-R MI a P*JNKUN OR TU(ON OR (MI-CO) a 9 _ q' i u RI W3 W3 iy so 0 lMl CT ! mi-CO vq w r•"(°" RI 2$ R3 R2 R3 R3 r'- a RI -�---'T'---1-;=�- -- R2 HOLLY-SEACLIFF sue/ I�.I .- R2 3 / OPso ( SPECIFIC PLAN R3 . � Lele[WlfpP CR / •p r.z ei� R Mrs ro � � OP R Ft3" R2' :DISTRIC% :Rz { - TWO) s i ONE)`" jC4 " HOLLY-SE CLIFF I J I N ;1� N • 1 3 SPECIFIC LAN I L PACIFICA C 1 WUNITY PLAN C (DI ICT ONE) R3 'I i H—S H—V i 41 C a 21f l0 — = S P a Sp 1 W , _ �. �• � , i - R2 •saR3 sl m - R� 2 R2 $ GARFIELO AVE �r�•�� 3.In 3f 3. NbS I 31LANNING ZONING DM 2Z SFr'TIONAL DISTRICT MAP 2- 6- II ADOPTED MARCH T.1960 NOTE: CITY OF CITY COUNCIL OMO LN proE N0. 764 •rr 20w9 •OA« a +• IK a .n Is eT[%U0 TO 9.T:«D TO T+r Cur[. •«f«OCO zOrL:c[[YDw 1«[«D[D 20+[e•st pO Q. a 7uc« ewer oI .r 1 4.60 �23 ITS liii r72.23 n a LEGEND: II•)-a0 Qs »a 12-.3 »•22 ues ?to. 10 A K•64s r3.20 q,{ Q .D«OC.VTT a[YOUTI•.p{r.KT N.w n4r-•H,9pA•• a••4s r!4• Iff, . -[o-oc arr acS.Oc.TIA,0.31.,CT HUNTII�TGTON BEACH a.lral , ea r.•15 rsJe 2000 ,••ril 200.204 0.8 II-Is »90 toot t� CO««Ybrr»CgITKsI{OYC•Tlp«KIDIST. 'S-{41 va fli 11. 1 »•s9 2003 -0-at 1'.- ,00 S:},5 nna•z too• 0 AIfK[•IaOrdfKr•t onT.KT 1211 1 2..' So -.Is n•0• Rost rf�1 a-.•{2 x•s f0r a•i-» »•Of 20at -- a[SID[«rI.>ID•KIILTua•9 dSt.KT •«[rcCe 20«[C•s[ p,ow. K-ni2 ia, .1t f-,.)f )a•If 2Oas O R A 1 G E C O U N T Y C A L I F O R 1 I A tie f2 2t2 1."1 a.)•n ra•Is 20)0 ® WS,WONT «0.1 CIA I.AT pur.19T T 3••{•sl so.. 2.Tr •T•p Lf !•1 a4-n ]t•H 2O87 «OK[«0„[pST.KT /•a-n a-a :.,. x•.•a3 sax no aa.rf »•, :mI 2 -R ai-f xl.. a•z•-V 11 na r.e-8 M•ri•a tOM w Cp•«vwrr M.ess es-C, ,.S. . 2 i... i-2.•a3 !D f» a••{•)f »•R !W, • aK«.•. CO««Mwµ o-s-AS 82-n xlfa :, Sn axf ,2" la•xz tlza a N[04N••.G oc«slrr e[sID[«n•t o01).Kr •3•63 e2-9 2397 .0-5•4• T3 Kf0 .3-71 la-2. 2.33 t-••a! M-n i)., •S•ai 303 II32 :Stitt{ la.. 213I © w9K,.,a«Don Co««[.CI.1. 1.21•K af-n 2H. t•Y as !•! tef it M.rd.r•.=C121)I -3•N aa.. Lla 03•ff ff-W I,S{ f•i-rr rl•I t's0 © «Ip,oC«eTV.tsm9«ru[OnraKT O-!•e) sl•I p6p 2•IAN i1•'A 110 a-mir 1T-e 22M I� CO««yu,r/•C,.,is ICnK)OiiT.KT li.t'lja �sii f�Is Oi-s{f aril 1 21 }} II•p•te�w��..•t .-(q> +,si 7Cp«f N[O+Tr[i 0K P10>'Xt K« �-n-,I NS•,.t +02 K-A•10 A10 Ia06 1:.94r MIA 2210 x•M-,I 91-2 St{ 3- ro•2e Ia, .-Ir•» rrx lxrr r .•zo-n >v-K sa, b20"1 n-:a If9, ,-nal n•u xzz. ® Ou,,,Ra c,.siu. �wlccn[R..a ar s,R rl•33 INr rn•rr rl•I. 2225 1-.7.1! »•�/Afl I760 II.10-» )s•.3 1328 •Co c-c Olsr.•CT --•-olo 0 SKpeC I !i» J IGARFIELD 1 1 I / / _ I___ .._ __. I t AVE.I_ L IT ' x y R2 R HOLLY EACLIFF SPECIFIC `' `' MH `^ a 1rF e;:C 1 a I o y :` R2 M I-A .. C2. ? 6 I T •; ?Y'�R2 3007 43004 R 2 R2 - , MI-A•0 �' R2 TS= I 'R2 C 4: `R2 R2 vo M I x t• R2 I PLONIpSTRICT 1.) 700 LCT �- . r•- AV= Z4...... r........ . R3 • D R2 < R3 a�cz:. 0 2 a:i;i`.ro:"1 R4 R R2-O-P 03 N :a•�::+1 R2-0 V; Sal R2 2LM'"3950I.1 nvC, a2a rE-......C,..•.-}...�'.4e...it�.jk� .;...;b RI RI :•s C�,CC r;-��:��`e:'.�: `{._.....Yr .•«.ee R2 y - : R2.0 RI � ' RI»!c WILLIAMS AVE 3 HOLLY-SEACLIFF •; �::_ '` ` ' ,•rr 2,• W SPECIFIC PLAN R2 R2 R2 i OP-ODD ..R2:o-Po-CQ o R2 3 Rjj C4,,j IL �~ Cq CF-C R2-o !R2 -D ~T _33Doo= CF-E-CD R2-0-CD :RI.OI �" (R2-0)`(RA) R2 C21 ,( �CF-E-CD' 1 ! -CD-0 I R2 R2 yr �jj ,RI_C, 0 TewM �I -CD-0 1 c. 3 CF-Ej �,SP?GIFT Pt:' N C 0 ,t O2-0 CO, I •CO'0 U 1 uo R4 �.uTKA .-Rvf. -CO-0 0 0 0 .0 R2-O R2-0 i "-p 361 I� ,- CF-R RI RI RI RI RI R2 -CO-0 I o o I .01 0101 -0 .0 ¢ K N N ' Y-cD-o OI:OTcc Rho 7 •.7•«T[T ~ SPRIN I tD -' R2 C4; ^• I-D. 'gy�p---1I o 0 N N O O K � �-O 0 -0 01 01 RI RI RI RI RI R2 -0 ROCI.FSTER a R71 I-0 �' l-� O ��0 jjHU 0 R3-0 R3-0 - Rz RI.O/ r1f-1 r-1ADAMS �', I AVE y r \ RI 1 1�Oi 2 aLANNING ZONING DM 2Z SFr'TIONAL DISTRICT MAP 2-6- II Mtc FEET ADOPTED MARCH 7,1960 NOTE CITY OF CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE N0. 734 frr ior[ •oK of •rr .c• •+v 4 MTLroEO TO u•QD To 1 cc+rE. .rEr m DCO .L:ese MITI ..[rxD �,[}j a°.lo. or .ID.T or .•r FEo-w 104 Its r- 111 n-NIV .162 T-u-so 43 71 f•s•r1 2•23 nrs LEGEND 1•T•f0 �ii 1fa 6.1hT) T3•!E 111f Q LO,OCryT',Cf10[rT4 aST,KT 1A i-t0•a1 1 uJ 4.613 1•20 nr{ PYN nCUf rN,IOA•• a-••T3 73-3• 19f ,E -CD•M 0t%WY,t5ME%T1q MST,ICT HUNTINGTON BEACH a1 1 3 a•T r.•r3 J,•,. wao 113-1 z00.z0{ at1 ,••-Ts n•)o toOx �C0MM T♦rAC1UTIt31t DUC•TIOrAL1D13T,K �{4, !1z ,T{ P••n n•3t x0o3 a•{z rlr foD �nas r••n•z zou ® orrKt•rwt=sar•L asT,Kr S•i1.6 !•• w7 -f•rt ri-0• xos+ •—1 ,.1.1E 1•1. wT {•T•n- n-or t0ai (�. atf10c-tul AG.CVLTV•al aST,KT •1 30�f f• f-7[ )�j t I- iii iH i:>rrf{ Tel ioio ® la.r 1MOVST,••t o1s+,Kr ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA """' ... ;; ;:. ;� ro - ..i;s ;;;: —�r°: ;r D1aT,K, I.3-ss a!•�2 2313 ,4•a] 333 fn ,••{•T{ r{•N 110r ,K-,N Co--C,C1•t 1-3-I3 ,z•Ia Este •6-{• 3n q1a f-21•T{ 1{-22 21zt 11 MtftM aI OtMSIT'KSIDt,T1•l OIST,KT •3•a3 az•I, 2597 4-5•14 •'1 10f0 -3-7T 11.14 2133 2••-43 "-9 IT•f •3•13 SO3 11)1 Iz•11, 1{-• z17! Nc.o ace,Ioso Co--EKut r•b-If at•1r I63• x•t•aa S•S i1N ..<a)a0r0++a•LC•rt Jl © „�,O[MSITr,CSIp[+Tul DgT,KT -3•I{ W. We a3-4/ tt-•D 113a {•f-rr TT-1 1110 rM O.3•fl Ir.I if0, l-n-„ „•II 0 •-1°+T rT-a 1102 CW-w�T'fiCM11TKl It' D�ST,IGT Ii ajj :�i) R.R. 6 ff {}_] Air &I'Mc.0.T.of MO�.ICTKr R-6-f1 nq}-z DOE 10.1f•tQ To•,o Ism •.-I,-1r Tt•L Ei30 •6•A M. �26 s•1rr1 ro-If 431 .J.Ta I EZJT • w so-4 SQf I22" 7l 11 Its, f•47 Tr-13 Rz• ® Owllao 4{ssv. -RICK"VSr1C R•f•r1 ID 31 :667 f-6•rr "1• 2... T-1r•r! Tx•1tle) irw u•IOa1 n•I) L`EI -CO GIVK a3T•11 OIDTLMr fICWK•'• 1GARFIELD I L I G. / / - �.' I._._ .._ __. t t AVE.I— L R f• -•, R2 R HOLLY EACLIFF SPECIFIC x'`'l M H -.,�, �N"D� o y R2 M I-A .. I�" C2•;`*' IR2 .LL-t Ka 3w3 t300• R 2 l R2 T R2 MI-A-O r •ifSf !RZ 4'; ,{ R 2 R2 yr - f.E31� '..",'� PLANtgs7RlcTl., soDl LAY - .. r,... -...w�......� AVE st:- ........... `• i �,als..w...z�:� R3 D R3 ez R2-0-PD z •c c'.'2"!:: R2-0 5y +R2 Ra R2 q R2 Nam '¢ -2.Y: 130 I ^E I-=DvIf 1._-- 3V 1 ,�:• Ina dr_.f•-G�}._.`Y.,:.. .F ....... u. RI NRI I 16 •f a ,3•i ��• •y. f!'+�0 ei'4: t.._ wI : R2R2-0-PD: + .r 1R2 0 RI �M1r i 'Va ( M1 mM Av s 3 HOLLY-SEACLIFF _ •� '"° W SPECIFIC PLAN Rz:o-cD~ � R2 R2 R2 1 t o x= OP-0�D IF -0-PD-CQ�.. '.�: o R2 3 RE � C rlwN AVE R2-0-CO s Ca i C F-C R2-0 2 _0 _3w°o= CF-E-CD l:r_ _.-�a, - R2-0-Co .aD I :R1-o, N R2-0lx((RA) 9 )� --- R2 C2 i CF-E-CD ° R2 R2 °• -o.I•�... -�13=ara. tRl-p sat m • ..—JnTcI vN: A, I II A �0v I R2-0 I Ra iaoc LIL l Tts ~• • -CO-0 v aa� R2-O R2-0 " 6 a o 0 0 0 C F-R RI RI RI RI RI 2 -CA-0 11-z lRl_O! CA-0C -01 0l 0 0-CAA-0 a . cr RtD : oL .a.-Tt spq..NG R2 C 4 I LD � o o T T. y �N. 4 -O -O I-o Vol -'011 ' Lt t � 04 m— Q •�1' i,� ��?�+ H < RI RI RI RI RI R2 -0 ROCM36TER —J < :° u. • jf Cs RI.O 4 �. , u O •s��+ RI-0 Y 0` 0 0 -0 0 � R3-0 R3-0 I' ADAMS RF RI � \ I AVE PLANNING ZONING DM 3O, -CTIO-NAL DISTRICT MAP 25-5-11 --L=r-- . au\a Er NOTE: ADOPTED AUGUST 19,1940 •1.\mr[wfgws•N[Iw ncr CITY OF C1T. COUNCIL DR 01NANOC N 7 y Awr ac.E.JAlwlwc AwT Nicwr rA• a INTt.n/O TO[AT9.0 To TNt CENTER AMENOEO W ORD.N AM ND 0_ORO.N0. Or arc.NIcwT or NA• LEGEND 3-27•i1 165 829 L2-19.66 U-521273 ©corAq,N1rY h=1LIT27I OUCATgNl a7TNN:T 12.4.41 211 677 1-3-67 PP6F212e0 01 a•PIOL PROVE$/I ORAL JISTNR:T 12-16'61 21t ie0 1-17-676s3A?41309 PuwwcO OEvh12 our/2r HtJNTINGT�N BEACH 3-7.62 237 9p0 9-fi•67 67-221349 s•1e-62 2SI toe. 3-14-6e 67.31 1394 NI Low 0cN, REsctwrW, farRRT 4-I-63 ISO t57 i•17.66 6e-2 Is 17 /I.1 a[c"20wc 1[[rfTP1111 aa�."iq�mmu "4SL'4 5-20-93 319 966 - L2-IMf6 66.41 N39 ea.w.T. "nw[ss /esTNcr ra-/ 2-4 6-3-63 201 969 ♦•7-i9 t7-3214e6 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA * '" "' T gi•4r M-a no 6-24.63 330 976 6•li•69 6!•i9151e ® KO•If DENSITY REf[LNj1AL ow-cr .-s•/2 w•6 !•r 12-2-63 777 1021 2.19-TI P►TO•e 1632 ® �Oww+r ewKrwL afT+Kr ANPu of as7 1-t-64 1601026 12.20-71 PP7t-11690 ® - " O[NlRT NE"OCNTrL a7rNICT i 1 i1 94 fZ' 1•20-64 389 1031 2-7-72 71.39 1731 © ResgcNrlAL A4#L.II,Tlo L INSTN= !•S-/• a4•! frw 3-19-64 4081043 3.20-72 7041 I615 rr��•�� au"t D AasrgArroN 1•n•u wm tas! 0;F.X LE�EN. qa•o /r•1 2•04 S-4-s4 38!1032 4.3-72 72.7 1739 a/trns[TYa asoa 6-18-64 463 1079 4-17-72 72-4 1741 1-4-65 165 1111 5-I-72 72.10 1744 _- S[TYoII LNt 3-7-73 72.461632 ..... MM.Tc.WT Or AT 66j2•�7-77 76-M In mec6L',.Am Or STREET.Lgvr[Nr ••0• Sr• WARNER r-n•T/ >tti 222a AVE 47 a _ a'2f -F- 1 — a 1 RI RI y CITY I or rOUN7MY VALLEY O ~ AMSTERDAM OR 1 , F- j I =? Z RI C m F 4 R2 R2 R2 .+ R2 1 W 1 1 b j« LY Co •a{ as m 1 1 RIOR ' RI f a 1 1 r RI RI RI M NOT RI RI RI MARSEILI 0R RI 2PO"OLD"�4 u 1 d I a RI g RI I o ! ' 1 1 VALENCII C_ RI RI OR 1 1 7• FRIESLAW R. 1 ..� RI z ' RI I�C4 R 3GUILDERS _ 1 H1 RI � 1 CF—E ' ow i 7 ILAICEvE•IvS^.S+OCLI 1 Rl xRIPO w ; ( ' 1 C4 ha : z s OP ,Sr.. � ts•a 1 1 1 I --KLATER AVE. Fi R R2 2 R2R2 M.LIN6 arN4er 4492 RI ma awcI R3 R'r; RI K RI " = c 2 /\JNw N. R1 _ R,Z + R2 NOSI E CR , I R I CL a•4oro aL 1 R3,OP- OP 1a.. AV R2 i 1 ' ; i OP SP-1 r tom}} a 1 � 70 •� •'—1 1 W 1 '• 1 1 N.LN4. a Lo.V2 25-l-/il/2 1 tV 1/4 1 i R2-P0�}. ' J � 1 = V Q i Sp— I 1 (ct)RA RI 1 1 I r TALBERT AVE _ANNING ZONING DM 17 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 15 -5- 11 f — — s,1CK( IN r((T NOT CITY OF .00.T[D.N�,T I,.I,fa a, f.�.N.pN. O... .t(: -Al TjTT CCITCO *JlT N([ N6 lfs 1ONl o+om�we.N• K.T or n INTcNete TO CrT1Ne TO T.t CE-El et fucN Aw.r a.•• •N(NO(O zoN[CAS[ao.NO. AN[No(O zof[C•s( aro.No. LEGENO II.7.40 .36 Iff RI 1CN COaTT A[3QNTYL OUTI,CT q:-S-fa I4a ta+ etIIC[Me.[SSgR•L q,tRICT HUNTINGTON BEACH =-10•f1 fx 6"S.r ®CeNNN- .NfIN[„ 2Ov,CT ]-17•f1 Iff fxf NIANYT CONN(RC1.L PSTSrnlRICT 7•s.f1 Iff 049 f•11•N MfJtfJ,I/f]fN Q.I(eWNK+I 0[IOtY,(yyNTl.�pSTNCT WX I1I-0 110 944 UT KI.7•93 36. car CC YYNITT I.CI�IT,[SI(CYCATICNICISTNICT ItCT ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA w� CM a; [,L(E.(.7IeN.�I,eT.I(T I.I5-64 P t s 1367'3.9 %/.IwTNN rU= Zcst In 1-21•71 77-41 171f 1-x1-n 77-47 1714 1T 4.1•f, N41 34 f•s•f, f.-I. xtfz 7.31-ff ff-A Its. 0 A 43 RaCO xCKGOf NYS•fl a,•. ifef BOLSA AVE e Rl �•-1NUNTINGTON M C2 L m w. R1 $ °` ~JC 3 °S u _, u u �. R oOVER r YQ10E R) a RI RI RI =%C4 RI RI RI RI < RI RIC2a RI RIRI 7NOR RI E' u C�+ a "s Rl ALE%ANDIIIA OR ALE%ANORIA DR RI RI RI RI RI RI riff CR .C%FCNO DR z RI J RI CF-E RI RI Z+ RI RI •IA.RVARO CANT RSURY CR P►RISS C DR fjNTEReUPT OI L RI RI woof RI _ RI RI RI OR ROSL CR RI RI RI CUNe RLANO aR CUMaERLAND D0. .t F RI RI RI RI RI pQ TYNCALL Oq,� RUTGfR3 CR 30REN � F C F E ORf 30fN CR RI RI RI RI RI = ICU' SCtiAL) RIrR RI RI 8j BROWN CR ,IA IFA% OR It SPUN$W CR OR r R. M of + RI RI RI RI RI RI uraott OR s¢LeouRNE DR : >• Iw u AR 3 R u u -+ „ RI „ e < RI 7op --- RIRI RI RI RI RI RI RI RI a RI sl RI RI CF-R W •C4 WI' RI RI a3 _ .7 d e4: MC FADDEN N AVE < RI z u m --� RI RI RI � RI 3 VA RI RI < RI `4 RI RI JRI RI N$ RI RI RI RI A RI )O RI $ J SI WIN3LOw c RI RI „ G a RI RI RI RI RI < a RI I DR ALSION OR. ANTPoAE CR st RI RI RI RI RI RI CF-E RI al 9 DR I ILL � $y TYRONf CR 3� Rsmhc al RI RI RI a C R I _+ RI b RI I RI c RI V ` URN CR DOWN n 1 RI >< CF-E RI 3 RI RI z z 0.ON- CR R I R I MINCLE V:EV S.Y3C:.1 SLIW CR ,LEA. RI J 3NANNON : (:::.DR a d RI RI �, RI RI RI L HOOKER •- OR NUWKES DR E R I CORK OR R I RLTNERF0110 OR S RI RI W u RI RI RI RI ; .I,OYA LIST R ONGFORD CR OLARE OR RI eREELANO DR Z IL S a 2 e RI e u RI RI RI RI " W OP � RI RI y RI RI CAVAN CA LN OR RI RI RI —7 III CP 2 RI•. C a = RI RI eo J R 1 s 3 s H RI A C4 1 7C4 A < Je EDINGER AVE ,NNNNG ZONING DM 40 o SE/'TION-AL DISTRICT MAP 36-5-11 NOTE CITY F CIT 1 O1 ADOPTED DUNE 20. 11c0 c i•*L.c 2p.CCITT COUNCIL ORDINANCE N0. 771 LEGEND '- M ml `CZL9• �L7�Ott A,E,Oco"-'•ao w. Al Lo-Xt "ftsctNft a3T.CT w-t•sl xn aro rmo ru=zowl" Ca]. !•r•at 337 soo It o.c aT.SKT UUNTINGTON BEACH SQ..x 13. w3 �•�rax iso ws c. «.. wer CONN[.C•L as*fKr tt•a3 tfT Me f20M' 300 43t cm CIM[MOrLS3�ON.l dsTfCt •u•s. 3t 034 DLKTT KI]—.,M-CT .•2S�•.••s.33 a3p.{y _ 3 3•f] ff-3a co-^ DLKtf TKl awcar'a•IOSTI1" s-o-v fr o ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA "�''"yl :3.4 •x•1p ff•3. �{ •„ .aN&coo low-2 y S•1•r7 T'•N t1�1 r000l.w DaT.CT 11-t•i T2"' r:p 1-T-•. .Pr2•T tafa IfONT Ta.O SLTUCa I�NL I!-ij•?S Ta-1' tilt 9G=.M(Gtt rt.N O<STKLT.INNYt�T 3'-76 74'}6 Ixemrs co..TNsn rtADUT p 1•tuenwl oancT 4b-0f 7s-10 2072 N•21•Tr 77-23 22.0 26 3 O.2•2t-••x3 a3-iT�1 2w3 !3 3C 1 tTef af• 2Ua 31':a :• h TALBERT AVENUE Soo RI zf RI I I I RI ' C4 cl I- GLAOTS WE j!R RI .N cc (•.7�3T:T:•xyK-`uJR1 RI RI RI 3T.N.c m RI I I RI RI RI RI-PD RiN�4 A:rN•. NNER AvE - :^_�' ;?•yl I I RI RI I I .•, .a DR _c orr o.. lwY•�.r .•'.+ f I I RZ RI RI RI 3 RI - - I I RI-P0,y� R2 I R3 R3 RI CF R ! so I I 'C4; R3 ' :V13Dxfaso �Ra � z � RZ RI ' i o j :RI ! RI I RI ti>ti; QK� JR2: U�R2 R2RI'72 I I I s 1 C4 ,�'' I :: I 1 '�R2-P08r 1 1 x I I j R3 R3; R3I 5 1 R2 Rz I �:ggRai MH-FP2 IC E R3 Ei8 f,.n•4 R2 �R3 R3 ,CvR3�'`kc`u7k:.ccDr I l.. I , R3 .p Sed,33 z RI-FP2 CONSTANTIN RI RI-FP2 1 R2 -R2' R3 f• f 1 C4 R3 • a _ Rl �' = < i 1 m i R2 iR2 i RI F�RI i I L ; ft•I GARFIELO / AVENUE \` ai rjo,b 'LANNING ZONING DM 31Z -CTIONAI DISTRICT MAP 26 - 5 - 11 .11 T E- - L mwa»mo^)•Ra� roar CITY OF ADOPTED APRIL 11,1990 � - �•to»t•o*o�»I»c••.Rm»*or w. ,a »ra»e[o o a•ra»o*o r»t a+*a� CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 759 cr LEGGEENDD::» ur.. oR p L n dro. Aw[vDED UK ND. Aw[n0[0 "Soo RL310[NTIK AG,CVLTWAL DISTN,CT I )-I•t q.M tN SO-A r.A•I n 0 �• Dal F. 11TES(CO C1 1O. HUNTINGTON BEACH p DDwwoNlr.FACILITICS ICOVCATIONIO STr ' �ii'n H� li-A nrp:i �tix OFFICE FRDI[SSWNtt 04TRICT s-ra rOt Nt .n•n n.n ems qz-.yy ):t nnr° ..a J•�t n•i. n>f , L,aNf ,NW irR,.L DISTRICT �!•:Y ] f00 •),� •ze y.I. ��I w0[4[NOw[�IIIR OVCRL.SY „ ^7 LDN DEnln II[SEOIrrL OWN,T 1 1 11 Aa ;i'•ftl :t €3:, Ns Nmw•NaN Dam NLsnarl L D6 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA is _,:„ Al tt,SS:tt.1, Q w"WTcDomem T[3owroIK1[ATWw.I . q•.tf )at q01 -•tx ) iHa .-.-• CIVIC DISTRICT q•pO )N q�0 Illt l 1a•n ttOa gZ0t-N N•)• 1f0] I•tON i�Nt q)0 �0 fa3•uG0afO�t NCa C- COwNYMTr/IC,yTILS ICIVICl 01STRICT i!:• !0. a•�•:r) 50., 1.•O.f• NYLTISTdW •�a laoz nQx R,ac°N-rL dsrncr tr,t• .ii ..N i Nn 171JJ14.FRCGSt ratty a STN[[T ALId.tVT LLTMY7[RDNT OF ItN scrw`C`LINE WARt ER G9 :r'r>:.no AVE '+ L + R2 LJRA) '^ M I RR D0. '° C4-MS CAIN AVE R2 R 2 l 0° so r —�R N !CF—E j rrHOO R2-- R 2 D MI MI '° ;•r�Y..CYCOLI I r fMll R2 L p j J R3-FP2 CF-R _i m g.' I wa R2 CEDAR AVE. - _ + >MI [R'2 N R 2 I R2 I D a (R21 3 i !,I M 4 I ri RI RI DETTY DR ;"s M I`�M M I ' M I MAX VIEW SCN0^I.) (y 11 1R51 �{ RI �.ea R3 R3 I u � � OD1 I � / � - 3 RI JR1 RI RI �RI iI - FZS C CITY YAR3 e0R0 u (HI) i y at JY O O .n I siT o rD: CF R3 Y O R3C K TUn 1 RI-CD rRI-CD I RK RI-CD a�N I-Co a RI-CD N ql R3 R3 R3 2 R3 13 —•-'— SLA AVE —: 4.CD (E41 R M . 0 D o M I M I J M H ------------- p L. y 40 SPEER A (RA) V i J E ar R2 C4; - g MI M I F R3 R Y CF-R - R2 Y R3 A :i~••p— {R51 Qp NEwMAh AV MI-coy MI R2 N, �1-,� :w kx •. Y'[ � �T Q RONALD OR. ^"vs � MI M R2 lL I C, Di A. R3-R3 Q sW—CD I R2 R2 C4 1 I m MI MI R3, R x MI—CD j OP OP _ ) TALBERT AVE 'LANNING ZONING DM 31Z CTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 26 - 5 - 11 NOTE - �ows+mo«s u[I+rsaT CITY OF ADOPTED ►PRIL 11,1960 +•so+[•om«I»c .«.uc»r or w. •a�•*[+ote Te[are-o re r«[ CITY I- LEGEE COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 759 cr G'ND::• ur.. � 2'4' ;q� oRD ( ANcwm use rq. AN[ilo[D EaiE TiS R[a10(NTu1L A0111CULTU.,I O,", HUNTINGTON BEACH .I �.;N �.E D ausiil REEDEM AL� aaY a''Nf i_n_A ry aer COwNUNRT FACILITIES ILDUCAT10N1DIET �fl� � tt /.M1; ± °IIK(IROILEEIMIAL WTRKt 4: « Ca ; a•Tt riaA (� ucmr IRDYSTRIµ DISTRICT I'i uT i•i:Ti{ „.. °n •�-E wOaL[Rowt PARK OVERLAY )T Soo i-E n r i al r1 Lw om"a[BEFImAL ORTRKT wv i-�tii �ni-o wn iky RS N.ry CM•�Rc11L RenrsDar<.L ORR• ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA o 1 .A-n )Y qpA bT.a q iqI•-rMi) )as ppo an n-�+ S!aa: COMMUNITY FACILITIES(RLCREATn«AL •n Civic DISTRICT I•lO.•M•'' ['4.''H.' qqY� q. ISq.:s[ M Cl• COYNUNITt/ACRJTIEE(CIVIC)OLStRICT So.. © NIATIETORT �:I+•n xf n2 rwcwn OtlraKr 2211 [.�a:�s<wia-•w %// m NE T»N rLo00 IO •IPE 2T 3 a -)•A .XI UN W.7,J0 PREOX RAN a STRIVE t IUVR Ew ULTRIATE WIT 7 CRY xi�r ar+ uoa -..-- n SlTarO!Lat 23 N WAR t ER s:w :i Iaw AVE :aI2E L n E— (RA) '^Fm I I I aA F'IRR OR. OP ^ Eo..—.._..� I 11 C4 MS- CHIN AVE R2 w E R2 r I CF-E .:GH.icHcOL) 16 So- ' p (aAI MI o MI R2 = m b f R3-FP2 g CF-R AV R2 I r 0: 1 s i wa Iw = CEWA AVE. � - - MI - R 2'• R 2 1 RZ i aII E. a o • _ wa ---- At i I NRI _JiLRI E D R3 3Eo To Il BETTY DR `}-'$ M I—M •! I (OAK 1KEw=CHO^^L) oR M I M I .(R3) R3 I RI rl. R3 / "' C 4 IS It u u OB) : R 1 R I RI RI RI �-C BARTON DR 3 -+ ( k3 � clrr Y:.R9 ' I PORD J O (NI) K N N RI M aT Tc: cP a .T R3 N R3 : to m RI-CD RI-CD 'RI-C RI-CD J 1-CD ■RI-cD R R3 Ig�1W R3 3 R3 R3 $ R3 R3 '� X9 :b� (Cs) e R M jCD o Nil MH � . ' MI I p g a i O ; 40 IAAI O 8 P R AV `R CL r.�1 5 R2 c a I j ! I MI M I Saf I CF-R 8 R3 _ R2 ~c4 !=.'•yr:vyr;:a._zNr�s:.r:s ) " N NMAN AV I ins) r MI-co R2 s / I3M1 = f.r 99 #/ 0 C RONALO OR. b gTkB I y / wn�:l•i s( ,o U !? M I M I R 2 J/ y'I•af'°i-[ 4: [ 3, W.- 3 W 'mblZZMI-CD u • R2 R2 C4 1 �Gis33'n•c 1 I I R3 x MI-CD M M I a OP OP4. $ i)[:% TALBERT AVE • f vaDJ�Y PLANNING ZONING DM 10 9- 6-11 a SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 10-6-II LEGENO: ii--nco0 2oNt•rr3 ®n000m. vor.cT CITY OF m SNOR W.toLINC u.TRICT ADOPTED NARCN 7, 1110 ®COASTAL z0»[furrls ®ONAtVILO Ct•]iIINJTbN pTT COYNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 70i rz ..UOI] rff--W1CONNNNITT rACILITININECR(ATCNAUDI_ •N[NDto zO t,u a0 w AN[4Ct0 Zd{ t •aa N•)I I R 29Sn -+,.A f o•an o. m® uNu[RNnr Nno[r . msrNtr NN c RL L'.S T R ICT SF@ 2 6" 2•r-Tz r11I-f IT'S NEO . DCNSITT ISCENTIAL OIf+a C T IOO(wA"-NIONI.L d3nCT•a . T-31I.1 Ina Nr a bAL ua»r]a DaTRaTHUNTINGTON BEACHf T2s I i•n- I»DY3TRIAL DISTRICT I o-n•ro Toro Isw a-s-+s r NLOT faa '3.7-rI TI-I Ia3 /A1{ TOvwLOT SCS• (I•• N[bwfoNN000 COwNMAL DISTRICT T i?:?z 1'-KI 110 li~t'-ie Tr°•"a 71iis .c<I CONwuNITT Dualw[s3 DISTRICT ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA .;_1! 1 ror� is ;: az;a2 ,;;::;.,KIRO.412/ 3Uf.IX LEOENO: A-••'2OrC CASE CAD rq =f-T$ r1 31W) :113 b•I�•e �]•L•• jS'jG. E COwaI»(O NIT»OIL RA004CTION Q•]•Sa a/•IAA Tfn L Or+•9 /11-T }{f.M{1 ® CONS.to TIT»OIL fNO04CTI24 IN Q-S-M aa•Ne 2— J• !C +� :.1;N a0=]C 3=/xC LdlwO(0 IT MLN •vE.ON wL,OOLC )•i-fi 90•a ))3+ �� f•21f1 f2•l S21I 0' W, +-t-a• $-+ 2Toa 3t ON NV,Oct..AK.ON Sw,A It 4 S. S•�nf St.. 2a!f E= DLSCNATLS RRLCrit KANO/STR([T ALI f}O. ^ •TAN BOLO low NOR mo COIIDn[0 MTN dt r.00LCTION 3 l A S. AN V j (]�\ EN13 CO.."=mN ON.rRoaCTiom o' C• —COASTAL 20»L aouNOART O M2-0-CZ� � -- 4pt� " Rb0 0 CZ - 'c�c P�� •:-RI-0 A ' 4 s M2-01-CZ �� s � a yP a• �w aTO- 4�• SKCI- cscr. ,p �r F1 g. I • / Er~r i ,Lo `�? tarla ,I Marc AK . IStcrcN O ,�r �r 4�Nr • o cF 4y G 0 b0o ' ]CALL IN r[[r + NOTE ALL Dn C.SroNS It d 'LIT zC»t•D,CININ]ANT barr 0r.11 4.TCNC[D 10 Cs-(ND To TNt CLN-t. or wcN RIONT or.•. PLANNING ZONING DM 10 9-6-11 & SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 10-6-II LEGENO: _ •ram—w»FLW¢:oK•..! • ®noao.l.w o6TA,CT CT ���� O� CM Q"Wl»t 0nS WI ADOPTED NARCN 7, I960 ®C0.51.L 20»t{urn! ®OWLV¢0 CLa3SirKATgN I CITT COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 73{ �COrW»t•f'0UT.[3([oucanbNALlon �CONWNITT r.01LIn!!(RCCNt.Tq»AUou art»oto 20»[C.Y*0 w!»L•!o 20KC st 0.].NQ, © La+.o[NSrt.ec3o[»n.L 03—cy HUNTINGTON BEACHA ®K�r D[»SdT A[{nlNT•L OnT{ICT !••N x)• fff 2•T•<z TI-N,N nn Q rtdW wG mN 'I![LpanAl on+•CT II •N zn.xft fN xn-T2 n-)n,l �s wtn ocNUTT enmarul alrAN:T •�•N S.! {f {•S.n n-1(ANI iT.f f-n•T {T.N{ 13.0 )-R-lt tx•NT 143 ®{CNCRAL arS1 Ntlf On—tr I E•Il•N N•N 1.11 O«f 2-x0-1) TC••! nn ,.*u{T[I•L OnTNgT �fIM l 11 T W i'.] t.>l{ TONNLOT xcti CI K,t•S0.N000 Co.-C.C..L p3T.`CT ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 11,J1 ; . .Is»4 f s' ..x. SUFFIX LEGEND: 6.3' .�CCrt�oN t�E:20»CGy at»e 2 i 1 ;I;12 IT13 1.3. i< .. r,N ¢•)-U U•u• 221, S) !)-4 t/•ayi{s ® eowmt¢ rlrN al rSoouergN iN ¢•!•N N-ue fn a 'o•+ems �� iao-is ,ic LZ.2.0 NOUNOte at rAL. avC.ON NC,tab r-f•!2 9p-{ }J!. .IS O• O T.2•N N•) 2T:f ST.ON NNr,0".N-1 ON S•I,a It, f•21f) f2•] 12�I •j y .4�� t•\•{f !!•N 2{Sf Q ocsNTC).N[Cnt FLAN g3TN[[T AL,N GA �\sS`� .y! •,ru ROm:oK 2sx r.! cme MTM o0./•mtICTCN V 'V `i�' � ewsNto rm(eIl wrooucTON �.z O G s q � d' ->' "�': -eo•STu to»ccy wrNaar - RI-0 4 r, � e�Rl•JO., ,S RFO ,a• R4 0 CZ - : RI-o- ;•RfG Cr fib. M 2-01-CZ -01 C N yp .fL.. a CF-E Ia a �, 4 e'y •,` O tee.¢ y� . CF4�:i •<� �' ��?ter p? ire •Y Q~ 140 ♦ �� yyr�t P,E,`� 'f 114, B � t y2 W ! Q~ TOA»LC • `,4E��%e�� 1lRo, �r F N �y l' .p . M 4 • p C� 4� r r D Ibtt _ )C.Lt N,FEET + NOTE ALL MrtNSV4$ANC I» FELT n+•c»Cco 10 Wt»o TO•.0 ct.•!N or mc.b4»T Or r.< - n16{ to 'LANNING ZONING DM 31Z -CTIONAI DISTRICT MAP 26 - 5 - 11 NOT£ AOO►TED APRIL 11,19a0 CITY OF CITY COUNCIL OROINANCE NO. 759 cr LEGEND:— ND:D:—ur... AN[Igco r-1*4 w% AucramIm M. fn1aNTNu-sfalcuLTw.L a3Tw¢ i Nco 0[Narr-scan=,Car,= S-1•fI O.Y It1 SO->D n+0.1 a+0 COIIYYNITT IKILITI[S l[DYCATIONIC T I' N HUI�TINGTON BEACH 4...� �. ,•�-TI �-1 .fx orrlc[PNor[faRIA DISTRICT � q•�•• !:, +J '�.)�Tt� TFlf lT NCI 1 LIiNT INOYfTR1Al 01[TRICT + !� i.. 7-'.L 1 - ] �sf� ��� :�aiffl - RI Low uNan fC9QNTUl oaracr 1 i•!'i3 ]I fY I i11 •+�•ix ji A3 WMM-NNPI 0[NRT 11[a0fMY11AL a: ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ;� . ;k„ o �i.f. [ONN[f[ML :TwcT f.''f ) •q q-dy q!a I• . M q Sfa i L-_M CIVIC DISTRICT ISTNICT (P[CN[.TgN I-tOM iN qI0 r'a,x0{ lfel CF�-C CO11-TT—ILIT111ICIVICI MIT... 1NIP$i •'�'=i lo.r i:i I Ns 1 Nu.ns*cN. C naeon•w asTP,cr zz a3 f.,-j=ia�i0yy! /i PROO PLaoD ,ST•r T !+!f •)•fT n�I�'�y sJJ�JJJfA PS[Q4 f[.IN M STRUT 4WKM )• N!0 Iio• ------ ULTIWT[PaMT(J VMT f•o f*ti r —•--- SR[xOI LIVE ii N WARNER oi« ITN woo AVE zf zs IRA) n MI N fIRR20R 3 OP „ C4-MS� CAIN AVE R2 R2 I so S I F-E •»C :ISNL9!1 R'2,. R 2 10 I :sr.s. wLl M I W M I a ( > I INII R2 = m R3-FP2 CF—R S I wa RZ '• I If st: c[c.R Ave I I RZ R2 =f O 14 wa j toff O fp3 RI RI I•i - 'a f'--- R3 33a To i KTrT OR `$ M I M I fC-AK'ArLW SCNOM) lau. a OR M l I M 1 In Y R3 «R3 �{ RI � J / I 9.Rro„0 3 RI RI RI RI RI Q I W i L.,F,.� R3 INI) PORO D .• °� N N RI RI-CD T Tc : D +RI-CD R3 z � cr GEC z w —. R3 � I B�F;I-CD g ;� I-CD RI-CD 3a R3 R3 R3Av 1 9 Z. 4 D C41 R M jCD o' y Ml � M I MH c4" ----------------- p U o O1 C R — O a f0 O 8 P 0. AV IRA) 0- Qa $ Atl R2 C f I � I MI M 1 R3 4 T �3" i CF-R R3 ; R2 C4 30000 N KMAN AV (RSI U • — { MI-CD 1' ml • R2 N. w o'i:[ Q 7 r RON4 6 DR. / : �'.P R2 z% " MI MI j ~ tr , of c=3 x M-C D o » I a E R3 R3 m i R2 RZ C4 I[ MI-CD M I M I c R3s { OP OP $ TALBERT AVE 2.- 2- q �, ��s r,� b ,+E Gy rev., .s�.�., ,sec cl ur i r1 f g'_Z' S�'V�� ��'i I y✓t (.: .✓✓ /.l'-v CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH / ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT INTER-DEPARTMENTMEMORANDUM RECEIVED FROM AND MADE A PART 0 THE RECCN04T COUNCIL MEETING OF_.. OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK To: David C. Biggs, Director of Economic Developme CONNIE BROCKWAY,CITY CLERK From: Jim Lamb, Business Development Project Manag Date: February 2, 1998 Subject: Preliminary Review of "Vacant Commercial Infill Properties", Community Development Department Memorandum Dated January 28, 1998 The subject material reviews 11 vacant commercial properties which are adjacent to residentially developed sites. Community Development's review finds that four of these 11 sites warrant consideration for possible zone changes and general plan amendment, including two sites on PCH which are currently under-going a change of designation. For the remaining seven sites, their review finds the current commercial status to be appropriate. We have reviewed these sites and have consolidated our comments into three groups, as follows: Beach Boulevard Sites: The great majority of the sites(8 of 11) relate to Beach Blvd., mostly being adjacent to commercial properties which front on Beach. We have been involved in marketing numerous Beach Blvd. sites to retail tenants and brokers and one recurring impediment to greater development is the lack of depth for many lots along the boulevard. In order to attract quality retail stores, commercial centers need a critical mass of gross leasable area, and the shallow lots which currently exist in many places along Beach don't work. When approached by prospective developers of existing Beach Blvd. frontage, we encourage them to explore expanding into these types of vacant parcels as a means to improving the commercial centers. While these sites, as stand-alone parcels, may have limited commercial development potential, they may be the key to the eventual recycling of the adjacent commercial properties into more viable uses. Rather than allowing any of these subject sites to be residentially developed, it seems that the City should do everything possible to combine them with their commercial neighbors to create more attractive and successful shopping experiences. PCH Sites: Two sites relate to PCH, one at Goldenwest(#9) and one between 17th and 18th(#10). While site#9 was previously recommended by this Department for approval as a commercial site/gas station in order to create sales taxes and provide services to the public, those plans were denied and this site now will become residential. Site#10, because of its small size and location on a non-major intersection, has such limited commercial value that rezoning to residential at the request of the owner makes sense. Edwards Site: One site(#5) on Edwards off McFadden is listed to remain commercial and we concur. jWretail/2198-2 44 10B CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION, TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members WMI"TON MACH Huntington Beach Planning Commission Chairman and fit. Commissioners m FROM: Dave Garofalo, City Council Member � „ a DATE: September 22, 1997 , SUBJECT: Small Lot Sub-Division Affordable Housing Issues In-Fill Lots Several pieces of information are attached that were distributed at the last City Council meeting. They are attached as: 1. Detached single family homes approved since 1994; 2. Housing sales in Huntington Beach for the past 12 months. I generally support, in concept, and subject to review at public hearings,the projects listed on Number 1 above. One of the proposed projects involves a larger issue that needs to be resolved since it includes multiple locations and a variety of land uses. My support is a broad statement based on the single most important issue that might not have been adequately discussed at the last Council meeting. Small lot development is an inevitability when, in the 1990's,we have large parcels of land to be developed that accept infrastructure responsibilities,provide common open space and other environmental benefits. Twenty or so single family detached homes on Main Street and Garfield and 20 or so in the commercial portion of Main Street in the downtown area only accommodate the financial needs of the land owner and do little for me as a resident,business owner, taxpayer, or elected official. In-fill lots in the downtown with mixed use designations fall into the same category. In addition,we should all look closely at the details of all projects as they pertain to issues of fencing materials, single loading of sidewalks, etc. We are not an emerging community incentivizing new home construction. We are a mature community where home values need to be maintained. Lower densities and public benefits are certainly two � l important issues when considering small lot variances as alternatives to particularly higher density entitled projects. Those same issues should not, however, drive us toward lower standards of street and/or other infrastructure standards. There are significant differences between"Affordable"housing and housing that is more affordable. Three to five thousand square foot lots do not meet definitions of"Affordable Housing,"they are simply more affordable than other homes on larger lots. Not an unimportant issue,just one that should stand on its own. It is also important to reevaluate our position of using existing housing stock in our "Affordable"housing plan. Attachment Number 2 clearly demonstrates that about 2,000 homes were sold in Huntington Beach in the past 12 months under$275,000. Those are first-time buyers with families trying to acquire a small piece of the famous and in- demand Huntington Beach life style. We ought to be looking for more of those kinds of people who, by the virtue of their purchase, improve existing inventory. Existing homes that are for sale, or apartments that are for rent, need to be considered in our housing and shelter inventory. Consider the Bowen Court issue. The same millions invested for the lot across from City Hall could have gone toward the purchase of existing condos/apartments with the result of fully rehabilitating older properties upgrading existing housing. The vacant and prime location lots then become part of the greater land use fiscalization strategy. Two successes are achieved with one source of funds. There is a place for subdivisions with smaller lots. We have had a Police Chief, Planning Commissioner, City Council Member, former Mayor, and City Administrator all living in smaller lot subdivisions. My goal is to use that land use tool properly and particularly when there is a significant benefit to the greater community and is part of Council and Planning Commission developed public policy on land use issues. I know we will be discussing these issues often in the near future. I prefer that my positions, even as they evolve, are made as clear as possible so that staff and colleagues do not have to guess about how I will treat these respective planning concepts. DG:lp xc: Michael Uberuaga, City Administrator Ray Silver, Assistant City Administrator Melanie Fallon, Community Development Director David Biggs, Economic Development Director Department Heads Attachments Jul'-04-01 12 : 09A P . 01 DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY HOMES APPROVED SINCE 1994 No. of Single No. of Multi- Lot Size Family Lots Family Lots (Square Feet) (RL) (RM, RMH) Total < 3,000 0 56 56 _ 3,000.3,499 0 78 78 3,500-3,999 0 160 160 4,000-4,499 2 30 32 4,500-4,999 57 38 95 5,000.5,499 107 44 151 51500-51999 63 27 90 Subto er/ 229 ' 433 683,. 69000 + 467 19 488 Total 696 452 1,148 ANTICIPATED DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY HOMES No. of Small No. of 6,000+ Total No. Project Name Lots * Lots of Lots toning Holly Seaciiff Area Belmont 81 17 98 RM Cape Ann 147 0 147 RM Meadowlark 330 0 330 RMJRMH Shea (MWD site) 86 95 181 RL Total 644 112 756 Small lots have less than 6,000 square feet. I Community Development Department Page i of 1 9115/97 I Jul -004-01 12 : 09A P. 02 (2) Housing sales in HB/past 12 months UNDER @$200, 000 480 UNITS FR $200, 000 TO $225 , 000 597 FR $225, 000 TO $250, 000 458 FR $250, 000 TO $275, 000 308 FR $275, 000 TO $300, 000 324 ----------------------------- - TOTAL UNDER $300, 000 2 , 167