Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZone case 76-05 - Kae A. Ewing - East of Delaware St and sou Mda V1 of Pvb9cation ;State of California County of Orange Ss City of Huntington Beach George Farquhar, being duly sworn an oath, says: 'Mat he is a citizen of the United States, over the age of twenty-one years. That he is the printer and publisher of the Millington Beach News, a sceekly newspaper of general circulation printed and put)- llshed in Huntington Beach, Cstlifornia and circulated in the said County of Orange and elsewhere and published for the dissemination of local and other news of a general character, and has a boon fine . subscription list of paying sub.scrilwrs, and said paper has been � '• established, printed and published in the State of Californin, and County of Orange for at least one year next before the publication of the first Insertion of this notice; and the said newspaper is not devoted to the intert•st of, or published for the entertainment of any particular class, prnfessiort, trade, calling. race or denomirwtion. or iubtlshed Hurrtinttart !Bath News,' MaY` any number thereof. The Huntington Beach New wits ndjudir.nted a lemil nmvsixtrwr hQTICA OF PUlUC MtA1111W of general circulation by Judge G. It. Scovel In the Sup►-rior Cotirt APPEAL TO DthlAL OF..'. : of Usage County, (,illfornla August 771h, 1937 by order No. A•5131. � ' ' 10Ntt CASs: I" HpTiCE IS HEMY GIVEN 1113t a VUb' tic tta4rinK will .b1 hsid by the •Cltr That the A ' - �Q Z�H� 'I (? Zt�j'+�':-_l;.lt:'MJ __. Caum4 of the CRY at Huntinttat an ft, ih the cmndl G}rmber 0C•3h•-VA Center, Huntinxtan.Dasth, it lh*ha.n al 104 P.M., or as aatan trttrfliriat/ M! 000:= 7 •~r _____.._.. _ . __.�__.. _.. _.___ note, on Mtutdtlyi th# 111h dal► of Msyt' of whieb the annexed is a printed mpy, was ptibiioht'+i In r tiA news- 1516, for tl)t tlurprraa at vormItlertr►i1 end Ippcal to the 60061 Y !till City ps+nnind t lJif! _.. ._Ei i7 UH Crmtmisylart of p-p+? 1l►arl for a 01 Mit• paper at lettat _._.. 9f torte Irom N2-PO. 4.(m4diunr a"tlrl fiKiCcMlrl 0ittrilt,plter►nrrd .CtasldetRIA!; ` 1u unity Far Rif)I to 02 �(mdietrp} c.(mimr"m, from tilt! �` i.! drtV of _... iO4Y Domilt� Ntatidghtlai Qeftrittl• III* tutkitrCi prapply )a joeatad on .Uis e4st fide V#i ontaw►r(a Gtrsct, rpprtjXjrn4te1y at4 fC#t 1�7F and e�ntiing ()It the „t^Lt7 ._., thy of min 0 AQat�a A.ortua. A tt't tti drscnption 1A on'ilia'in, !tea vinnnirm tlrlrttrtmorrt otfico. All intartetad pa(kns arts Inv!ad: to 1,)?6..-, tr.)th eny:t tnriti-1vt', an"l Ili r}!I,•n tl'.Irttw �.,i l pouf►l :trt=l !hand airid fear;nt ,ant erwass !twit timer of p11tl1ratl"In Ili !..wl 113,-•r a.•t, rr,,W it;y v_u(' 1• :it, I in tht• Vinkfic ire or aSlirttl a,fld spAatl regular nit'i entire l;•',ttt• (if •,.tc'1 j" ;+' i•.,i+ ( t', lttl'I r:`.1 ill It fortha7 intomieian may tm et,r,+�trinod i'' 1,0"I Ih♦ eflice of ttta City tupplemeltt, tiro) .ald notice wa!i i,ut,it•,he':I iht'st :. t,:► thr f„llu,ri"i' t�AfiGCk /,prat �*1, tIa1G. datej, to•wlt: ` Ciry CrP 14MY114010h GIJ.t'►! Mn Ci1r CIAM Sill"wril,r-1 11tul r.:r(trn Io 1M4nre Fill- 00 • , 616 . Gm :WI i'1' ' sui oER CA. LIC.NO. 100581 411 MAIN STR1:t:T . SUITE Fi NUN71N(,-TON HEACII,CALII ORN A 92648 TELt:I'HO (714)S36-4022 r � April 28 , 1976 V .f r. City Council City of Huntingto:i Boach 2000 main Street Huntington Beach , •CA 92648 Res Denial of Zone Change--Zone Case 76-5. Ladies & Gentlemen of the Council : I wish try appeal the decision of the planning comission lnade on April 20 , 1976 wherein my request for a change of zone from R-2PD to A--2 was denied. It is my desire to subdivide the parcel of land into lots suitable for building; multiple units . This is not provided for under the R-2PD clasnification. My reasons for developing the property for renUil ur.i try as opposed to a planned development are av follow:;) 1 . Sul.cdlvlolon would inflow for public.; alley separation between the exisitint, coil tank farm and proposed dwel.lit:g uni L j . 2. The property i.t; too ,--mall to foatiabi ly develop into a viable condi )jflnlum project . j. The cmjall. ritzc� of condomirjiUm oil # hirs property would pl. c.e ctn tindue hardshir,, upon future owneru to support. rvereat:ion rind ftpen "PTICV11, �3 . Amen.itivo rcquirod by condominium biiyt-r­; Viould be ;l.i fficul t to pruvidv c:orspoti t1.v(?,1;r oil a !n'oject Ur thit" �� 'j'r;is li�.�. t)�at.?J'�."i:.1.U1'`• '+r'�.'t)'f t� ,'1:l�l.' t VI{ tri .� t"S'.� ten�!!1� /�ltttr� T' U1)*�(3r uIC)T`iti t�r�'4"f".lt)Ex+�(� �'.�i 7: I'(.`Ilf:b� Ctl'C) �l!'<. i t.f'-ayl dov''IotjfYd a..' i! („'?l�iC�(:il; 2.It1 !lit �?j'C1 �7f..'C� • i City Council Re i Zone Change to R=2 ► Page 2 There are no restrictions and no guarantees to adjoining 'condominium owners that condominiums within their project will not also become rental units. Gbject3.oris raised by adjoining owners were on the basis this would be a rental .project with absentee owners. Experionce has shown there will be many resident owners within the type of development I have proposed. I respectively request a hearing before the City Council at your earliest convenience to more fully pr !sent my objections to this zone case denial . Yours truly, P G. Williams i BCWtcd i i I f NuitiNgtis Renck P.liNaiag CimnlssieN P.O. IN�X '1iM - ` ' .• , CALIFORNIA 92M • cr ') rya ''•� 6 ro Dais April l, t r19 Ss:�E� ;,r,l r } c :•a •� ; NOTICE 'OF ACTION A2_2licant:, Kee E. Ewing B. G. Williams Subject: ZONE CASE NO. 7 6-5 Your application was acted upon by the Huntington Beach Planning Commission on April 20, 1976 and your request was : WITHDRAWN ;LPPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS DISAPPROVED XX CONTI14UED UNTIL Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Cody:, the action taken by the Planning Commission is final unless an appeal is filed to the City Council by you or an inter.�ated party . Said appeal must be in writing and munt act forth in detail the action and grounds by and upon which ;:he applicant or interested party dooms hirrejf•1f aggrieved. Said appeal must 1 be accompanied by a riling fee of. seventy- five ($75 . 00) dollars and submitted to the City Clerk ' s office: within ten (10) days � of the date of the Cosnmi.t nion ' a action. In your crss}c., , thr• laat: da,0 for f:.il ing can appeal and paying t,ho � Mina fee Is ......_. . ._ .Aprif 30, 1976 I Provisions of the i(unt.ington beach Ordinance Cvdsi ,Iry ouch that ally rjr>1:111catJors b(!Comcs null and void orle (1. ) year af. trvr :iflal approval , unless actual consst:ructlot) has atr(Art:ed. Very truly youra, �{1}Ilt. ' 1 ,ft,.C}ii 'i?e'!�iC.'il �.'2. :t11121r1•r� i.!?Tf:i: f rt:;.1f'It H untin tan B ch Planning Canm15SIoi! --..�- • P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92948 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council ATTH: Floyd G. Belsito, Acting City Administrator FROM: Planning Commission ;.. ... DATE: May 11, 1976 RE: Zone Change No. 76-05: Apeal to Denial APPLICANT: Kae A. Ewing B. G. Williams 411 Main Street Hwrtington Beach, California LOCATION: East side of Delaware, approximately 460 feet south of Adams. I ' REQUEST: From R--2-PD--10 to R-2 PLANNING CO2•LMISSION ACTION : ON MOTION BY BOYLE Allij SECOND BY KERINS ZONE CASE NO. 76-5 WAS DENIED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: 1. The request is i,iconsistent with the development concept previously approved by the Planning Conunisrsion. 2. The request. is inconsistent: with sf.at cad pc�lici.er of. the General Plan relating to encourac e-wertt• of planned residentiiil developments :,n larger unsubdivided land. 3. The reyuent will not provide for the best use of the property at3 it relates to existing residential development to the south. PIA1414ING COE*tISSIOrI RE,COMMUNDATION: The Planning Commission ret,olmilendrs denial of Zone Case No. 76•-05, a change from Ft? •F'Ej-10 (Medluri! 1)erj+>xt:y I:c'r; �L1r:'Tyta 'll.--E'lnrin(ycl I�c.vc�lo[arnc�nt: 10 units per acre) to R2 (Mod.iurt! 0eji )i t:y) . SMIMARY OE' STAFF REPORTS : Tim exi.stinq suffix •r.c.)rlinr,E wu:. requer '.t:�d by the F�l:ci�sr�nt E�rc�pc�.•ty c,��rrer and approved by the Planning r.:ollifll .Cssion .in order to allow t1le cor:t: i.rruati(arx UC the P1arined Ftesident ial. Devt'lC?j_riv!nt: t:hti=tt: t"Xist:,'3 tU the south. This e:� isting condominium devc�l.optn+!rxt: sr.:15 approved ))"' t:hf-, Commission Lr1 October, 1974 . At: the t .ltm., of its aj..prt)val., the a.t::'s desire to maintain t:he till ; fr►z•t11.it:y of !,he plal)II_d devolo—ml -r1?; cC7r]C.ept, E =Page 2 throughout. the general area between Adams Avenue and Memphis Street and Delaware Avenue and Beach Boulevard. The subject site is apart of this described area. The- 'applicant for Zone Case No. 76-05 has indicated that a subdivision for four-plex type developments would be pursued if . the Planned Development suffix were removed. (A planned residential development could not be developed on subdivided lots of four--plex size. ) Thus , this requested zone change process could have the impact of directing future development on the remainder of the site in this same direction. This would be contrary to the stated intentions of the type of residential development that the Planning Commission desired for that area. It would also be inconsistent with stated policies of the General Plan that indicate a desire to provide for residential developments that maximize open space by encouraging planned residential developments on larger parcels. The "PD" suffix as presently appli`d to the property provides for this type of development. In summary, the Planning Staff feels that the present zoning is the most desirable for both the subject site and the general area in that it will further stimulate an integrated "Planned Development" concept and provide a diversity of housing type in an area of the City that has only minimal diversity at the present time. ADDITIONAI. INFORMATION : Mr. B. G. Williams, the applicant , addressed the Planning Commission during the public hearing and spoke in favor of the Proposal , ,'.tating that it was not economically feasible to develop the rite as a Planned Development. A representative of Hampton Oil Company , the oil producer adjacent to the subject. site, spoke in favor of the request. Mr. Mike Jagger. , developer of the project ittmiediutely to the srut.h, Mr. Fred fmf;rby, Mr. Dale Smith, Mr . Ar.t:hony J, Deceru, Mr. Bras Ivy, and Grace Fink, all residen i of the r(M1dN1i ;1A, t,.;oject to t:tie south , spoke in opposition to the Proposed chanUc. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : Negative Declaration No. 75-2S w:at; previour;ly approved iiy the City Council ot. 'lane Cat ic ilea. ?5-07. 1,ono calle ilea, is within t.ho pl.irview of thiv previou:j (.:nvirotvn(.int-al ast;essment . SUPPORTING 11111"011111ATION : 1. Staff Report 2. Area Map I?c� tt ill y /ov d , ,( '" ric' 3ard t , 13•:ar I tw r ` ` � � ' � � • � � � � � , fit i LA cl CA LJ L—JI. _--j i ft . .�.....• A m r7 �f�T1� df,rOt '-' T itt/ltrlP�l,Ta G S T CALIFORNIA On tV a.:.:..:1.. IIt m . .7 DELAWA ST a AWARE L .--..� ST ' � r c:) aT ! F UNIDA C1 C7 L7 _. < m r BEACH BOULEVARD _ __....M a ---O..C , F . C .D, 1 r � hfl�lr�tt '1l11t1� r It .. - apoll- TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: April 30 , 1976 ZONE CASE NO. 76-5 -�TE FILED: 3/16/76 APPLICANT: Kae A. Erring ZONE: R2-PD--10 B. G. Williams 411 Main St. Huntington Beach, Ca. c LOCATION: East side of Delaware, Approximately 460 ft. south of Adams REQUEST: From R--2-PD-10 to R-2 ,.. •"t��"� . r � 1 . 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : Negative Declaration No. 75-52 weis granted by the Enviroiitnental Review Board on July 22 , 1975 . This recent zoning change request is within t lic purview of this provit:)U, onvi.rontnt`ntal as;esi;inent. 2 . 0 Gr-?-1rl?rJ, INFORt•aATI ON : Zone Can,. No. 76-05 is, a to elimintitu. the "PU-- 10" ouff. .l.x on tho subject property tliat: was, re(.-ently by the t'lanninq Comrnioni.on on Aucfufyt 5 , 1975 . 3. 0 BACKGROOND The existAng suffix zoning w;ir; rot.1ue„tc!ci by tlr({ ►,r(,�_>er1t. 1ar. opt rt:y owner in order to allow t-fir :r)nt.lrtutit. iran of the l'1arrri(ccl Ftutrlrlt-ntitil. Developmerit that: oxists La thrr Sc; ILI). ` ili -15 c.!xiSt.itt(J cvrrcic:m1111trm develt"a1�nw!f1t. was c,pprc?vc!c1 1;y t:lio l'1. arinz.nci are Gc:tallt*r. , 1974 . At tfiv time of, its appr•c>�►r.t1 , the ;.ol""111fi;-riran c y.pruni-(id its to maintain t;ho tin i forwi t_y of" thw devel ot..,itient c oncepL through- {a(St. f fif" Clt:''r►t'Csl� ti {',t� br.-tw(;.•('rl Adilrn ; Avc.-tiuv and 1'toml:-li i n Street and ;I;.;!;::irtc�l`ti �1'.'f.:'11C,1(,' illti� tjf:..`tiiC`�2 t{r►1.r� t"li,t rcl . xt Page Tvio C 76-5 4 0 SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING: The subject site is predominantly vacant with the exception of an abandoned b;.aildiing in an advanced state of deterioration. Properties to the north: are zoned R5-0 and R5, and are vacant except for some oil production uses. The property 4o the south is zoned , R2-PD-10 and is presently developed with a "Planned Development. " Properties to .the west are zoned R3-0 and developed with multiple family units. The General Plan designation is medium density residentiia1 (8-15 units per gross acre) . 5. 0 ANALYSIS: The requester charge of zone is located within an area that has been referred to as "the Old Town Planning Unit" . The general land use character of this area .is that of mixed residential uses , such as older single family homes , a limited number ct larger apartment complexes and typical four--plhx uses. As was recently discussed with the Planning Commission , the caret, is experiencing tremendous development pressures , with the great majority of these developments being the typical four--plex. Many of the larger parcels have been or are prop,ised to be subdivided for this type of residential use . The applicant for. Zone Cara No. 76-0; has indicated that a sub- division for foul:-•plex type developments would be pursued if the Planned Development suffix were rerloved . (A planned residential development could not he developed on subdivided lots of four-plex size. ) This process could have thy:- impact of direr-tin' future clove.)opment: on the remainder of the site in this same direction . This would be contrary to the :iLated intentiono of the type of renidentvial, devel.opinont that the Planning Coinmi .nsion clvr r:.,d for that: erttirrr.. area bounctcd by Adams Avenue , 14r.r;phi s Strer.-it , Del w; e St:r(.et and Beach 13rsulevard . It would r-als.c) be with nt::rtc.d 1 policien of the General t'1-an that. inc'a ::"t�t.r` a rlc!.; irc� to provide for rr:r.,id(rntial dvvvloptw�ntfs that rncixitt.iiZe open r.pace by on- wouray.incl planned res dont.ial. duvo-lc pments on Jarger parcolt, of unnub.;divider) land . '1'hc 'TV n-uffix as; pret;ontly appl -,?d l:o the property , provides, for thl.8. t-.ype of klovc;`loprivult . In sumtnrary, the 1'lartrlintl Staff 1.*(cvlr that. prer;vnt: 7oninq i,:; tht.. 1110 st. dvn irtiblct for tr°7t.ti s.tv- tstibie,-t. -situ and the ftt:!rleral area in ttri.tt: it will i �Jl Z.itf?1' `it .litl}r lc`2+{' an i nt(a4,,rat:i-d "Ill iin-nt`_t� ()t trf'.l.f) rliit'rlt:" c ollc'tq.)t, alld pr ovido %t C hf` u" i nq tyte ill all tlr l'i3 of t'.ho City that 11*03 olill .. Page:.Three ZC 76--5 6A RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends denial of Zone Change No. 76--05 for the following reasons : l. . , The request is inconsistent with the development concept previously approved by the Planning Commission. 2. The request- is inconsistent with stated policies of the General Plan relating to encouragement of planned rest dential developments on larger unsubdivided land. 3 . The request will not provide for the best use of the property as it relates to existing residential development to the south. JMC:gc i I - :z � t s ..,_.. iris 35 HOTICP $JF PUBLIC RMING APPEALt.� DENIAL OF zoNE CASE 76-5 NOTICC . IS . HEREDY GIVEN that a public hearing will be field by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center , Huntington beach, at the hour of 7:00 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible , on Monday, the 17th day of May , 19 76 for the purpose of 1 considering an appeal to tiie denial by th:• City Planning Commisuion of a petit'Lon for a change of: zone from R2-PD-10 (1,edium Density Xesidential District - Planned Residential - 10 units per acre) to 112 (Modium density Residential. Watrict) , Ilic subject property is located on the cast aide of Delaware Street, i approximately 460 fret :youth of Adams Avenuc. A legal de-Lscription in on fi lc-- in Lhe Pla nci nq Di--i eirtm-nt I . All. intereeted poroons are invited to attend said he©rfng and express their opinions for or against *aid � x•j:��l � . I; Further information y be obtsi.aed ircxm the Of!�'�:d of ttxra City Clerk. WAD: :)nt.i l :�9,,.. ; _.(.. CITY OF, lWTItdCTON BEACH BY: Alicia 1-1. 'emit-torch 0,11'f Clerk 1 .t Zone r:aan 76--5iapt. of transportation AP' s typed by Jana ` ,. ,+ 120 So. , Spring Street...,, Lor .Angelea, Calif 90r52 Attn: Staff Assista.-, hoe A' Ewing 25-09iM03 25-094--13 ; B.C. Williams 411 Main street Ernest L Hetherington Hobert A Dank Huntington Beach, Calif 31:1 Portland ^ircle 352 Portland Circlot . Hunti'pgton Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, r;alif ; 264B--► " 92648 25 1.90�-02 N , John V Henricksen ` ' ZS-094w.0( 35-094-1.4 (o!g t# Adams Avenue Lesli.© Z. Osman Richard B. Fyhrie Huntington Beach, Calif 353 Portland Circle 342 Portland Circle 221648 Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Cal"I 92548 92648 25-140-04 ` Hicha:d B. Williamn 25-094--05 25-094-22 Ch 013PSwanner Glenn E Guffin Leo F. Stock -Is . tl bank Blda. Henry 0 Buros 5161 Pt. Loran Drive Sa ta Ana, Calif §?"01 P.O. Box 9832 Huntington Beach, Calif Ka F.winS Fountain Vallay, Calif 92647 17 F.. Ocean Froric 25-094-06 's5-094-23 Henry Barbs John P Butler B a, Calif 92bfX 413 Portland Circle 413 Oserogc Avenue ' Ku,:king ton Beach, Calif Huntington Beach r C ali f 92640 92648 2 0-CS 25-094-07 r 25-�094-24 Frank W. M� ,� Sohn r butler Jon 5 lienric c►en U861 Bolin Circle 1 458 Del Prado Drive 5 t1L 8th Avenuu Huntington Beach, Calif Hacienda lleightB, Calif s , Oregon 92646, 91145 9 2 150-01 2L- 094-08 25-094--26 F rrk I! A arr3 6 Son Alfred it. Alvarez Barry R. Xaa,bc Conanruction Co. 421 Portland Circle 421 Oawego Avenue P t,. kmx Drawer A Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif fi A ngton 1jeach, Calif 92640 92648 25iv�50-07 2a~094--09 25--0,4-25 tie a.:t�t A. Azcr�rn Hobert M Litrich Jack Ktaat)e tal Memphis BragnStree `l22 Portland Circle Sri Needle Blvd. #08 Hun inr}ton f3r*ach, calif Huntington lie, Calif Merritt Inland-, . Florida 92648 92648 32:)52 2 5-094-10 25�-093-�02 25-G9Aco Arnold 1, Wjnt.gcztr,csxy Cc he-1 YI Miller and/or Clock Chustny 9392 '41tnt~uc�ket Drive vi-,r h Y. C ant�nn erit9 Cater, ut :.+trr�tit 1ltInt;incixc:.n Beach, C'aJ.fi S#Murity PA,.:i.f.i.c: tlntl lrreattrc.i»tctu�', Calif 97.G4ti '1't�:� il,l�•iirtlo.i i 92683 Za-f79f..01 25w0°4�17 n1 ,0. 13tax 60a01 Tni-in Antic ,il�t� 1:. yrt;ue la�� itt:�rttl.e► , t:t�l,if.�. 1t:i ..laa� d S. .i).ial_rc 411 Po fi .and Circle t3VV 0 iC1L Portl and Circle Huts tisx7ton boacht Calif' r ," o3 ( 9c1 -11 1 30 i,.3 Z �. � Peach,'yt �, J. i. i, R, 1 } . v i. ��i�, .+I '` `. t;,2.t2 i .i i7 1 t t''t �3 t:���;1 , £:; i. t t� cw ; M '� '"� •''�, !�2ci=1 -•srv..4.j: ;°.?: './,•t-.•t•:)• •'}'.f: .f.S?: 1 y. , .e e[r •rr•.• )' .r f,: r ! Cityof on,g t.•t,,. ti i_<< .,I�•..h,7 its.tC3s .fiS:r=..w et'yv7 ',r•` OFFICE OF:THE CITY CLERK May 19, . 1976 Be , G, WilliaAt 4ll Hain St. Suite`H Huntington Boich, CA 92648 Dear Mr. Williams +'t This letter is to inform. you that .the "City,Council of the city- of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held j rf6nd8y, May 17, 1976 denied the appeal which. you had filed it to ' the denial by the City Planning Commission of Zone Case 76-5. Sincerely yours, Alicia Me Wentworth City plank AJ.'lwiwm t