Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZone Case 81-3 - Lindborg/Dahl Investors, Inc - E side of Ed IN'J'Ifl; jai upenor Court + arTnll: STATE•:OF CALIFORNIA � • .� 3 In and for the County of Orante CITY OR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CITY CLERK O{)Er OF 1�QA�tr, '1i OA Hearing 81-3 State of Califcruia i� t` i1�• , u Orange i f is 1 County it d 1hr��T ,iMnafl�, t �1004_ hi 4(din( kcaw tea11 A&dtl�WeatIS Rita J. Richter r,[:wr Art uicw tllxlatrAit W t�t,ct w a4 *1116 That I am and at all tinsty herein torntiont J wall a citizen of ` � P.4 a r+Mr•►tft r+4+fM, ttrr the llt+itrd:itateM,rnrr the axe of twrnta••une y'r•at>;,t+n11 that 1 �� 1r� t�.; ,•,� am not a patty tiv, not intcrrrt"I in the a11o.t entillyd mytler. 0r1d at at I an the rinri ,al clerk of the +rintrt of file- Huntington at:trl :311AI1 *utiltt' that t � f t � . e:�'e�.t�IarJ ttiti aMi>w►l�, ` Beach Ind. Review t° a n"-si,at,cr rsf{cenrtal citculnti„n,vul,li,hrd in the City„f With ��,y*1,� tanrs,rl M tJ1rlMlltrtlal�>�t > Huntington Beach �i!'i•�,Mf�0.ct Isev��+r:1ry.R�w��1�r�+td�,►� County of (ItanKr anrd rhielt rlrwKpe{lit i. puhll6rd (,it lie «Nt i,�d . aa[ rraNt o4o wtrte:�st• !�* +rt a tww•of lct diAeminatiun of local t,rvst►null if,lr III krr;rr- of a gP tie ral r hhrat W h it rsrl.W 600 Wral?Nk ter, and ++hull tsrwvpaper Ott all tirnc& h;rein tnentifmr,t hail ' and still hua a lx,na fldr,<uitkvitii,tinn lint of paying nut„crll,em, tvu t1 n�tart Maaw anr! rslflch rtev►aJ,,t►,r► 1sAs l,rrn r.trllth.ht t, f rmtetl lit tl {u W C,+w 14a ll9hrrl 1st IPP1ar u+tervn!„ in the raid Cmint1 of Ornrlye f1,t n /t9 as.asi *r fe , Exfis«d t><cradinJ{ unr year; thn► 111!• n.,lice, t,f 14110, the ogle is rr this 1!t"�ttiS Annexed is a ptiot4rJ vopv, 1,a+1 irfrn pul,liol,ril in the rerutnt t►l+ t �114 L1+� t�t?l .it• 410 f Mire hoof-, of&Ald newslu,Jft, 411.1 n,•t in lint' r uppit:lief,, ) �ftq thotetlf,on the felhrwinx datro,fr,wit: '+a • d,f •t ( i, +1p ` December 101 1981 �►� : tl14€, , OrhP ell �� t'�►11� = ; Yoh►` -l�1t►�1., ,� ,... t of i 1 'tit;':',." , ` I ;irtiiij' f:.► dr•cl�•�r•1 t:nrlrr fx•+tatt�•<,f ;,rrt1lr, that tt,r i,,1ef;,• -I +.sue P id�e. t-t t. I11i 1at.. . ... .. . . . ... . Garden Grose . f:1tl,ft,S iA'tlitr, , t• t J1,> f� tl<3� r t �tl�i,.�x l�e�'..N I.Y•,r-G}yJ�. .e..t.:. _ � w���') — .. . ._.� ..-,.......ram. ..' .ems, `. �_._ .,�a.,w...----. �" Publ i sh 1?-10�81 3 t lit NOTICE OE PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CASE 81-3/MEGATIVE DECLARATION 81-26 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Counci? Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach. at the hour of 7:30 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible on Monday __.. the 21 st day of ember 198 for the purpose of considering Zone Case No. 81-3. a request to change the zoning on approximately 15 acres of property located east of Edwarcis Street, approximately 10M ft. south of ElIis A-ienue from RA-0 (Residential Agricultural District combined with O:l Production) to 111-0 8000 (Single Family Residential Distric": combined #41th 011 production with each lot hawing a minimum of 8000 sq. ft. of lend area) , The Planning Commission is recommending that the zoning on the subject prt,lerty be changed +; Q-RI-O, 8000, (Low Density Residential District conibtned with Oil production with f n &i! d with a qualified �► i ,ten f a land area and cv � to i t each t having m nir of 8000 s t e o a. 1 9 q cIbssificatlon having five specific conditions. ) NegativA Declaration No. 81-26 will al%o be considered in conjunction with Zone Case 11o, 81-3. r" All interestefJ persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions � yr r: against said . �. .-,rC1�s� CASE 81-3J11E0Ai tVE U�CIQ�ti i0�t t31-2Ei -�- Further info?%nai Lion .:4y be obtained frLxi the Offire of the C►ty Clerk, 2000 Main t ; Street. i4untir 9ton Beach, California, 92646 - (714) -536-5227 TEO lI-?0-81 C?'Cy f1' UN7t! {itU1 6€lu! 4: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk r (' t".pp..t�.'�i�t w.`r ;fR+. t+'- 'u rs �•"l- tj ;•.! '•!r' i.' �r''ra:•.� �,� 'x r,: 't S "r �•`""•' h �rl'.1Su9�s•Y�u'FF�`tJ' i'�T t At .l F ^t r y S y+t ,��r /I •i tI � •. ti,"��P!a�rrr�'.•=t,pt 7 r S i �` •tf � t !' ��} }R 7 .<,r,..It ;��r r.,' •r !!. -ta } ,'r ?t R I •.; .r r-Wi ,fir ♦ � r '-a 1 " SG)1. IF r :1 Cc,Tq 'cum TO LIC AiARIf1G r. Sr t2..La i y: r S l� C11'Y CIERYta 8 ,onytCL ' DATE::. Y <; PLEASE SCiO UI�E A Fi1E3.IC`WMING USING TIE ATTACHED LEGAL NOTICE FOR THE rt, attached a �`�-•.� P s re A z . • Ap's will follow No AP'a ` Initisted by; 'r Planning Cormnission Planning Department Pat itilon _......_,.. Appeal ...,......_. other .,,..,.,...... j t � ' ! Adoption of. Envirotunentaa Status (x) =` YES Ito +� Etefcr to ., plaa►ning Department - Extenaioa► r~� ' ' `Cv .adctlt iota l lofvroAt on. x 'Tr ap,',aI pleaae tranumit, exact tv he requireJ I(% the lc•�;a►: . a t � q r�ti }�'t2 rw4 ii ,•..11 G_ 9x• x It �! _ "."h x' rrY"` ai, _uif 1. r.. '"tty:1 :•.L.�"$_3....e�,_Y�. �?.• J ..F..��z<.yx "� .t.„•.:r,. r .t r Si — r}.a"; ��� I ��= .��,i �'k• .•, .y•. 4 b. i ♦.ate h "s ... •�-i-; ell - '1/�7• _ !.,::s>wY a{5 r 4 ti )i ati..:r._(=v �•,;. :i^.I:; :y.T, '; '• . r t '�.r tf��y11 1- �I•�t t~C .. t �+• :.il�. Y ,+:lw,t 7y/?t•i F 1� 'e•[ _ ,j a. yf.4 ti• i 1 "�'y�• fr( �,n. j f/.4Y •1 j .1', 1 ';"a'C ,K"7+.'�i � ,t S•�.yl'-, t. t'a...,. ' ,. ' ,r '"y f�,IY•�"4a t 'r - y jorA op g5o M -�`'��/l,.• -' Ir G,� 1�J� /\x", LA IYI Yv-\ L-,)I Yr 1 o c� �k utl 0 .. . �. lr J ,r'of C'•. L r» o71 , OJ� �,Y- '- ,� y/ .� M' •.*�. �{ �� �n� ��iMM��. �' '' �" '�' ~f �M.R'��,. r�.. loll' Py ock�t (.It '{ �a�� �� � ,� C:�� C: r �,,, ��"r1 eta!r� � `}•`� ���,t��d,,� �<<�»� �'''� � ,'�+ • R"' � 4 r ` , •off.. 1 i t e Y , i f�>{x.. !, J.ti� i ^S f'""�. �'� V t,�..�4 !,� � � 'f � ���� `_ �,•*r�.'.ri•"t�'�//'• '�^''`11�� V+ `+/`� , gr C_0 IA) �y�. t few• v4 I A �� �»•• �_ �,r+a r�at ►�� i'a S. ,] � }�r`x �f i+ �,,,.»,.1,. �^` �• .,.,�.jF •,...� it �p :�„J �1 r,..� {..+�'�'r., .,�.. � } *'. �'�� ,�ry�,,,*Q..r;I. J r-4- �'�'Z'�,�J w.r .. *. .x•",x..+..,.+.. .. - .... . .., ,.. ,_ .. .. . .._ ._ ... ._. -` _---r,._. ....,,,.�.___e..,,,! e q t+tTt i..al....t r ,�,. �.lkr,;�;[:L{'�.�� �' M I 1K liI 4 S t llo-192-a9 , w Zilt� ZJIImMibot]i, Inc PAAI+WI L. TAylQr. �4jj,t it ti'i tu`•�tc11, W4, 0 s� .^Ca11if ! "Vh )1, 1961 w 1 615 :lath Straatrt t 92646 r < t 110-•1 2 110--192-11 M at Al .FL.�rrcttJrrl-�„far�txu�;,rt�uttl � li�tial !' Jo+�'r.•�aa t �'� . kaific: 03W t Hiigh*Ay i 2307-3t t'`% IftrS{c" Must 1571 Powdila Arvnwe ti�irkitt wli tyres t, t3ulif I l.ryurs► Fdi1A, CLuf v 3"ch" Cali92653 _ _ __ _ _- -- _ _I_ I ___ 110-1� I t1Q�x42-12 '::f..tiaVia.! Urtsl awatum AMFirt dtr3cs I s1r.1a G eructs 1 ; 17JU la dfic Coast Hiyhowl I 299 lieraacm Wy 2231 Kup>vlia Calit I ban Luis c, ispo, calif 1CM9 �Ma 1p Calif 93401 __ _ _ _ _ .. _ t 94+dt5_ ' _ - - _ _ _ - __ - - - _ _ _ - _ _ - _ - _ _ -r - - -- - - - - - - - -- . _ _ _ _ I '.°` 11c►-70S�-09 I 210-19{}-{�6► ; UO-192-14 xis 'c: F�;:tt ; rwilic AMW Oil 00 (lArEs 1 N►1.lt�r► 1! !�lacr�► ta .1 Mbltcx it Atty + T385 Santa M3im ka%U. 272 S A&Iaict! 1Xivu : :, Z1222 Mr«, Sin n 5trorrtWif i HaUywlwd, C&Uf 1 l�awsrlf,ltills, C.a1.if `- --- -916Q1 + 9 --6 90212 ___ ,.__ _ - _ - - - - - _ _ - - ------- -- -- -- - - -- - - -- - - 11O-2w-lo i 110-192-01 I1tr-192"-16 tW..ljtax1 owdi Will a t1;; I Oats HulAram Wwriet T %von 4.1U, �t Main Am it 2M Alta VizU Dri%Q t PAWL Pjnc:r'an r►untltytbxs Lil wis, CAlit + Yistd, calif ` ..0. L nc 1398 �- - _ - - - ,; 920a3 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ !,,. + C3sul- Vieaa - ..- - - - - - - - - _ - _ _ �w _ _ N M M _ 4 114`'2U(}'.li► 11Q-192--03 I 110~-19x-19 M�tiklt'r;tun sch Ccae:�.as ty I 'Iced 01 ivw t Rich era Wt lt,�rn MQy�r Jr - ` TAK,LAivia�im I P.O. BM21.91 I 1b101 N�u•iur,�r Cxriva '12a ljust>; :;tt`trrtt ; LbAtm Ituls cacl.if i f rtll.rtiFtxm ranch, c" rrAliciuqu, w11f 94L.W 1 92653 + 92649 -- - -- - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - . I tt ` ,�.l -l(1K3-1�c i 11U•1�2-{�6 t 110-19.3--ol °..;;1�Aft.*�II�'M�Ia�li�MtY + Fti�dtU► V W�.rra + i ttir L.d1riatXVtor V Viiy$ + 22UO 11tat A t ,=t 4401 � 'xxt itw"h, calif 92660 1 k � -100-11 mttr(mv! Kbt-WILAm (lap , 1"Ju .F firxwiwm% + F3�rt..n w tslxtl joiln E lWwaal + Mrri2tii.t f l t.�.tt t?EI<iY1rIC`I U Eft 713 I 157 t -A 200 !kmth taut L+ i dtvv► +�Se'Srt�a, L.i a 61 �t&� ,sj.,t'i.-Yj!jLllu, UL-0 3 1 o f ► I will ia'a J RAWA 'f v;•vJ t .tA Ia tl ..�i 14ura A Ot th is , 753 + the a ": R Kryl=d 1 Y05p ",flua strtvt W, f 4041 Tivall A,,wx.3 ' IX3s Bay, txm t 1ANI kla, (llCl&j, Gt�,ti.l�t Ot t - t 97 2U + d t + } .S4L „ 7 y 'f-.} �r r..'}. ....:...i s-✓- ,.,..py.. .t:�� ,�• .- .�. ,1 t '�"�_; ;' '.. •11, .`rI'}µ� e ( �?. if.+yp.r «6, t yr Ft t t 7 #+� {r x "r. r "• .. � '�•r r- .. a� ( s t r',. 2'7R f'i� r1 r-a{r�w,•,..t f•tit. 4't'zt.d. - � .fir. �. .:11. .I ! l .tt...`�¢+t t ftls�d!^. t ,L {.i j'_{ �+w < r yr.� f + r J r r +. w w•.. r..�'r w .,• a�r�r r,.,►•w .r—-r.r.r r�.r r w. r.�r,r.,•.r�i f��.TE ��.i �� �_ •- .. .,� �M� I tom' .•M r •r w w w w ••._ w ._ Ti• r.� w M r w r ,••r ua. M r r w r __ w r r r w w r r r r r w M •♦ � I , 1 I " ... _ r — w w rr « ...►wr rrL•r — wwrw rww.w .. r wwrr rr. wr... r .. - !r wrr wr rrirrrrwr r ..••► r r r —.• I err ^ I I . ., ,. _ _ _ .. .. _ w ,. ,, . rr .. rw _ r ,. .. _ .. .. .. , � .. _ .. .. .. .. ., ' rrw .. w _ rrrw _ rwrwr rr ..w w r +. I I _ _ _.. _ .._ _ _ —_ _ _ 7 _ __ _ _ - - -- , _ — _r__ _ _ .. _ _ _ _ a ww_wwrwrrwrwrwrrw 5 . .. .. .. � t . «. • r, — w r r w r w — r r r r w "'1.. r r �.. �. r .« .. r. w .., _ _ •, ,. •. r. r ..+. .,• .� .. ti.ws�w _ ,• _ _ M w w _ _ r r — _ .• i r r r _ r I 1 • I I -•'Y.• 4 .� — r r ♦ - _ Y _ w w w w _ - r — w _ — _ r .� Y w 4 +, �, r w ,� _�M r w �' _ i _ ., »Y ., M r •• _ N V w w w. r r w I � F ,�� ,f� . ., ,w�f •, w. .r w wa r w• r _ .w• ,w w w. MI r M .i w .w M. •r {n� i Yf I M ks� 1 � ' 2 � { WSJ �i,,x>}sKrr;y r I M_, Y! .,.�.....:_'..��tw..�..,�s.ro; .w+�'�_`�y.``i "„'-" +1 .Wf •�"+i Adeii'�..'i;.. r, 7.'. .X",",�1;"'..'1'Iw .r.. e".a�v"f.r*we,,W3Y '1. g!ly h t +d3 r x'"r�-r,r alF �: 3�•r 7: .. .,3 - _1. t r ♦ ° t i t' I tfr�7.3 L 51 t e• j t , •t . un -0 PW'n a h rY z; P.O. 66x` Ift CALIFORNIA M N OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK s. December 30, 1981 Lindborg/Dahl Investurs 1720 Pacific Coast Highway Huntington Beach, California 92648 The public hearings on Zone Case 81-3 and Zone Case, 81-11 which were scheduled for the December 21 , 1981 Council meeting have been continued to the meeting of January 4, 1g82 at 7:30 p.m. in 4-he Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA. Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:bt Y 3� I sir M1 FYYI ■����h.•s�ivk r"ir6G.1A:.a~i.4L "!x h, .w.r'': .'•i 1 .. ..- '". i i - ..: ...-.._..._r..."....:-....ti�.n4.v_..._- �..._..._ .. _.._-_._. _"___,......-_.._..y_.. ., .. .. ... ..„ it 1 4 { -REQUEST.,". C a. CITY, COUNCIL. A TION -REQ `flats December 21 1981 ri ' rn :SutimittKi to: -.,Honorable Mayor and City Council =� Subtn�t�d hy; Charles W. Thompson, City Admiristrat -pr p by: James -W. -Palin, Director, Development Services Sub.lct: ZONE CHANGE NO. $1-3 5'a'?3 ' /�}•,t/f"f Ir?.�''�'"�' Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, r-mdinj Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: t~ STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Transmitted for your consideration is Zone Change Eo. 81-3, a request to rezone approxime tely 15 acres of lard from RA-0 (Resi- dential Agricultural District combined with oil production) to "V-81--Q, 8, 0U0 (Single Family Residential District combined with oil production with each lot having a minimum area of 8, 000 square fact) . The subject property is located on the east side of Edwards ''- Street, approximately 1, 000 feet south of Ellis Avenue. WOMPIENDATION: (PLANNit�G COMMISSION) r The 1 lannir:g Commission recarnmenrls that the City Council approve `lore Chance No. 81--3 as amended by thc', Commission to "O'l--R1--0, 8, 000 with the following conditicns : CONDITTONS OF Tttt; "ten" 'f014THG: 1. . An future project approved for this parcel of land Shall make provioions for erltie.s,trian uret; within the development . x 2. Vac 3tion i.r, t:opoctr .nny ,hall be provided fn the development plan implemcyntrir;c� t.tfic; zoning. In particular , u rwLaic throuclia ' the property shall. be pr.•cvidcd which approximates the ciirnenr#.c�nf� of the existing Swta.le. 3. Development of thi:� F�tarrcYl sip-� 1. 1, t c� as rar.c�at �a cl�.�circ:c� at; practical , t-c� compatil�lG wi.t.il the proposed specific plan ' :. being prepared for the area . `. '` 4 . Deve.l.oi-�:ri►.�nt of this parcel rahrixl allow for inraov<�tir�n in P; .. . t:vi)e;� and [Aacc!;z',ent of 1•10c'sing in the, project. Ar:y future project. proposed or +.hi. , property ,Olall. be scab ect to tbo filing zind approval of a con�i.ti.r�r,Ea1 r PP A� I�YSIS: Hur2t2I'ig"tQT1 SE'aCI"t. Calif . X4464q 1 .f t , ZONE-; CHANGE: 81-'3 x December 21, 1981 ...... per.,...�5•-'..«n•.—*Mr"tr^-"'fwvw-.rv1V"F+N'*p+f'fsr '+r.-'�. ,r M�rr w•s rr7 W„•T�f( .. . ''. - : -:' . .' . ... x'.. ., ., •'.n..7.un:rCK•si.w.a..w w1..wW l..w.� �na2a}sw+u.ixrrwwk....krMe.wt..ItS:.+.v.awr,.+++•+ ww......wr..a.....ati :i+c-rrrwecnwsi«'a±be..r....,*.t:4txx.,ltV:tr..rk'•u...its+c,a,,...`.c..a..+.+..3+G*�...•:+'•�-+"'>"" hOCATIOti:' East side of Edwards Street, approximately 1, 000 r,. feet `south of Ellis Avenue. r REQUEST: ' To permit a .change of zone from RA-0 (Residential i ; Agricultural District combined with oil production) to R1-0-8, 000 (Single Family Residential District combined with oil oruduetion with each lot having a minimum area of 8, 000 square feet) . 1 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ON NOVEMBER 3, 1981 : O t JIOT1ON BYPORTER AND SECOND BY PAONE NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. . 81-26 WAS APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Kenefick, Paone, Winchell, Porter, Schumacher, Mahaffey NOES: None ABSENT: Bannister ABSTAIN: None ON MOTION BY PORTER AND SECOND BY KENEFICK ZONE CHANGE NO. 81--3 WAS APPROVED FOR RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION ' WITH THE FOLLOWING FIND•INGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: - FINDINGS: i 1. . The zoning of this property, to Q-RI-0-8, 000 is consistent with the Huntington Beach General Man and is compatible � with land une designations for nurroundincl properties. CON____DITIQt•J.5 OF T14E I#�"r_'! 7r�zcrr,: 1 y .► r c) ' 1 1 �1 - i � o t �.i� �ravc cl f:ar thit� xircc.l f la d t:ia 1. . An f`i tore, r e.. Y E j rr x make: provisions for equentrian a sc .s within the development . !'•...,'. 2. Variation in topography shall tic: provided in the development plan implernenting this zoni-, In particular, a Swale through the property shall be provided whi eb approx.imate�i the dimen-- �:',';' t3ions of: the cx tit:ijig swale. 3 . Devc�lopwant of t.hi s pure el shall , to as gr.'eat a degree as prac:.Jcal, bc comp.x ti ble w1.t:h the proposed spud i i r: plan being propared for the area . t.. 4 . Development of this pa c:crl shall a l l cw for, i runav r t i on J.n t1•p:! - and placement of ho; sincj i,ri tt:� project:. • y'l Atn;Y'+ future project proposCd for t:.hia p;oj:ert:.tshall be tl3b- ;; . +a . inch and ..pt�t c.t .l ofacc.rldi t�i,r 1150 fay rr-.i t~ r AYES: h:C.nefic"k, rao:G e, S'iin+::he 11 , Porter, SchuSItach(-r, t•sc3}� ?I: rt�� NOES: None 4 r r nfb 1G,NT. Banni st -.w F A13 'Y'A 1111: NonfS . s 4.4 .i..•y ..uif`r-'r�._:a.'„�,e�'r.d.a{.1."L't.i al'k"..d:ab f3�.4 -.xa ...C.�3.1. F..3...�1.. .} )...!•',r..r.'+Ft JF:c:.... a_"' .� '.,: ..... l ..ter... w ......... _ . ..._u W.... . ..... .. .... .:. '. .. _>_. ...... 3r..,. j ZONE,'-.CHANGE NO. 81-=3 ' Dacember 21 1.981 � .LY1+4+s.i�hl.rlcbk,2J�La,„Ii'�:w" a,N•4t.tit1 w'.�...,- +....i.»r ��':�':�i...:_.....erwr:.:.y.�,"`i`�.+. :r..r, '. ...1,,. ... - ' RECgMMENDATI0N ' : j STAFF) tr The 'staff recommended that the City Council re;ect Negative De- claration No. 81-.26 and require that an environmental impact report be prepared for the project. The staff further recommend: . that the City Council deny Gone Change No. 81-.3 or table until completion of the required ETR or the specific plan . in conjunction with which the staff is preparing an ETR. f +++uwwr•n..,... . +v.•..+4rr w,1.+••+g7.iral4r .^1M't':T"t•'1,.y(.,t,Ssr«.•r++t,rr,.!";^f,N M- eyf.v....•(+ �v4q'rr ., 7A, �In" j..:'Y'.:: n tar r4Y+NJ.W uw+r.K Mw ..rw. 4,w4�M'+i rr..w.tJ•rlr.••.,,.....•».,. w.....". . ,., I DISCUSSION: Zone Change No. 81-3 is a request by the applicant to change the zoning on the property from RA-0 (Residential Agricultural Dis- trict combined with oil production) to "IQ" R1-0»8, 000 (Single Family Residential District combined with oil production. with each lot having a minimum area of 8 , 000 square feet) . If Zone Change No, 81-3 is -approved by tho Council, it is the applicant' s intention to construct one dwelling on each 8, 000 square foot lot including equestrian facilities, narrower streets and less intensive public imprc Rments . The "qualified classif.-icatilu,n" was added by the Conunishion to insure that equestrian uses will be included within the project, to allow for Innovative hypes of hotul*inc;, and that the project will, be compatible as possible with the specific plan now being ;. ' . prepared by the Department of Development Services . The staff ' s recominendr,tion is outlined in t be att:arhed staff r. c.port . � ENVIBONMENTALSTATUS.: r !` The Planning Corntnal.stt#.©ri r��ccarnmcrid.'; that the City Courl-il. adopt:. � Negative D,,clarat:ion No. 81-26. F'Jt�souan.: X. :;ot applicable . hLTERUATIVE AC'TIO14: The Council may consider- dertyiog or t;abli.no Von . Change No. 81-3 until completion of an i:7I� or the r ser. #',i c �tl ari r..urrr-nt�l y beinc, ` , r a r a . . t a t• . r • os prepared b . t:he Departs .:_nt: cif.: lle� elor�r.�c nt .,r:r� � cc_.,. SU} t Ft'i11.0 i�"L7,MATTON: �. . 1 . Area Map Ordinance �`���,vG(;S,G}�.d��'S.Yk.lii.NX.k5�4.y.l:i 4ir.0 .'.T.jJ i yM{ .{t. :"{4 e�. SY i.p..1.n1 f.. t .u_.J.,...,w....u.a.....r .�.�..�-_ •J..a.'�.A.Lf.�� f,';n,:r,';,t.: �r•: ,�y�.. �„�.,i H•,t. t3,. "'•lr 'K. r.3�T 1 -C. 11, ''1'"S. t '1 } 4 r trtZONE.'.i CHANah•.NU•-:' x��3 +r + + .. t 1 .1. Page .. . .. _y., Staff 'Repart -dated October 'b, 1981 r,n! 4 ...; Planning 'Commission .minui-es . dated November 3, 1.981 2lagative 'Declarat�oYi No. 81-26 ad tTW :SMS:J IM _ r ,t T~ •1. cA 1166f` N j r � , S ah� f r J{ ..� r ..�r..•.•53.�}.!'' .:' .. ...'1.'. rt-.- IR•. ..r-.r. .:.:.... M1., ., s .. �..,_.. _ •.. ..... _.�.y..,,"........u..._�....�..... - ...� _ v .. __ ,. ..'1 ei..nf.1::.risu�•Yh:M �S d. 1 .. unt�ngtorf beach davr�ifo6 lervildei do'irt'ment ,tr + !.SFA�f f ' 2r r�p�r� 1 t its.„��"i t�r • ., F + 9 T0: } Planning Commission FROM: Department of Development ' services DATE: October 6, '1981 ♦♦ ell, ZONE CHANGE NO., 81--3/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 81--26 "'"'' •'' APPLI Lindborg/Dahl Investc..s, Inc. DATE ACCEPTED: ;. 1720 Pecific Coast Highway Huntington Beach, CA 92648 April 6 , 1981 REQUEST: . To permit a change of zone MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE: from RA-0 to R1-0-8 , 000 June 8, 1981 ; applicant con- ": curred with a continuance to LOCATIONS Subject property is located October 6 , 1981 : xs on the east side of Edw,-rds Street approximately 1000 ZONE: feet south of Ellis Avenue. RA-0 and RA-0-CD ACREAGE: 15 acres GENEx 10, FLAN DESIGNATION: Estate Residential (0-4 EXISTING USE: Vacant:/oil production units/gross acre) t' SUGGESTED C 4 L " The staff recommends; than. the Planning Commission reject: Negative Declaration Bl- 2f anti require that an I.nv.ironmental, Impact Report be prepared for the project. Staff f.ur-thc�.� .ecyonir�tendr: that the Planning Comini.suion deny Zone Change ilo. 81 - 3 or table. until Completion of the requt.red EIR or, t:hc Spccif i(_- plan, bar,c-d on the findings butlined 11i Section 7 . 0 of this LAMA' rr.•port . 2 . 0 GENE AL INFORMATION: RMATION: Zone Change No. 81- 3 in are�ciuct-.t to Lh�7ncic� t-he: current zoning de grintion on the subject property from PA-0, Residonti.al/Agri-- Gultur,-il Wstrict comb3nod with Oil 11rcduct:ion , arn�3 RA--0--00 Residc:•ntieti/A;irictilturtel District combined with 01) Production , Civic District. , to It1--Ca-E3 , UG,:, Low Ur.nsit.y Resi.dentiai, c•cambilled Witt) 011 itJrti'vn, with c►uc:h lot havino .r mi:1.fmU:(2 area of 8 , 000 square feat. The intent of tho requested Zc. ne chancle is to allow Subdivision of approximately 9 . 5 acres of tahe ,ub:Iect px'Cper. ty into 1.ridi -v.I _ dual. lots r,rncl i ttt# r"c�rr�f r#, at)C to1. , 000 acluar cy f c'c,t i r2 :a i.:t!, wa th .., : art r`a at• 1 G l,e, rietw ttr,-ecr of 10 , 000 sctciare f.eet , and to aI ]rw :.;ui.;- AMEX 'T r i z. G��q�Jy ` itci-ZC• ; 1 +,it + ' .•; •r j , a r°L •k Y{j ' QV trJbt'z': it�i •19S1 ,}t S ,. ., • .�ji .P;,�a •a•c o ., = t �' �•. division of the remaining 5. 5 acres into � Pots having an average; '" , t,► r` .�4 net! area ;o_ f 30; 000 square Feet. 5UMt�lARY•:OF ISSUES: mayor issues of concern regarding Zone Change No. `81-3 . are: 'its *• 1.,,. The p�roperty.':in question•, is ,part o�c .a larger area ' for wliich a 'spciFic plane is curreritl"y; being; prepared . to implement thc� ,,►; r ; " General:: Plan estate ..residential designatic�,i. Rezoning 'of +: s ..• .. properties in this areaI.• is• ;cons�ddied pr�amature until 'said specif is Plan' has -been- completed. The current +zoning designation,-is • inteMed 'as a trarsicional N`�} � . zone .to,.prohibit .si6divisioii' until .permanent zoning: whichal- . Jst be.' consistent. with tile.General Plan has been'adooled. The two posed. zoning .is .one of. several. alternatives that could be con sidered cons;stein with the General Plan.. 3. The; rubject 1property and surrounding prop erties''s-, currently z � , unserved ..by`- City, water, sewer, and. drainagefacilities. . The - 'general. area, also: lacks a coordinated intfsrnal. 'street system. Because of- i:he number `of property 'owrnars .=in the general area, T a, plan: to '-coordinate .the. financing anu. construct�or� of mayor "c l . ca ital, im rovements . neEds to be .established "prior to . approving, �,.`• ° . zone chang�.�• that would allow . subdivision or development 'of ' individual properties in this 'area . 0 ENV RONtd NTAL STA U.,. I ,The: applicant submitted a''request for a negative: declaration` along :.. . :with ,the zone::change application.. The subject site is to.,ated .with an `overall area; considered to• be environmentally sensitive by the :.staff � The ; staff: is presently , in the process 4f preparing a 4 ' •�4 " apt-cific plan' whi`cY�; will serve: as im lementin zoning far` the entire Sp. , p P g g r ` aree•`generally` bounded by` Ellis Avenue, Garfield Avenue, Crystal and ''the Huiit.i•ngton Beach City . limits . An. environmental 'im-. being pzepared . for this specific' plan. .area which.-will '. r. ►�f a` t ' idtify mitigation measures. necessary for environmental .protection en 'the'entire estate residential 'area . * The :EIR bein re area .'to .' .. g P p ;, wr .assess- the estate. residential area is 'not yet. complete and,' .therefore, adequate_ y'- assess :the .environmental` effects ' f the, proposed.:pz'o jeer , it -�s. rec ommetided that` an F.IR' be required. ' 5. 0 • y SURROUNDING 'LAND'`USE - ZONING ANC GENERAL. PLAN DESIGNATION 'Cne stib ject prop%'rty i3 comprised.,oF three 5-acre parcels of land .wh..C . are .v.acatit with the .exception ' of four active oil-:welJ:S; ' arj < 'alhanci one ld! storage ; tank, ;unimproved. service. roads., and ."above�-Sound `��y�1><t� �e.t�} tl t ' t •e {Y ' -. = •k,, `+ " ' * 't r`,Once :s a iFic plan' -,-and';-env p; i i nvfronn,ental Impact "report have been ' S1 d:'iatect, State ' law :iGovernment;..Coc� 'Sect3.an`'S5�15.3 (b) ) pravidee; that F };r lora ,.. gvznmenta noel: not:�prepare,:anot�tier. F,IR or Negative Declaxatio;� Ott:ti,'s, ° poi r indivi.duai fro♦;ects. that pare' nsiBtenti with the specific 'plant ' si `+ October 6, 1981 p Pa` a ..3 S=r6i idi g .properties are designated estate residential with al-lowable,!dansities of two or less .units peracre generally '... : to :the north and west across Edwards Street, and . foc:r or Jess., :units -per . acre acre ene'�all to : the. east. and south. Properties to g Y f the. north, east,. and soutrh ,are. zoned either, r,:A-0, Residential./ Agricultural .cowtbined,-with Oil , Production, or - RA-CD, Residertial. - Agricultural/Civic District, and are generally vacant . except:: for sdattered -oil wells. The five-acre- property directly north ` along • Edwards Street currently p0pports a' commercial horse stable, one . oil - well, a: d several -storage tanks. Thee area, west of . E��wards :Street 'is zoned M1702, Light Industrial District combined with y,; .,.• Oil °production, and is used � fur fairly intensive oil -production. I� r` ,�, i'•. 6. 0 ANALYSIS: ,The ;s0b`ect property is part of a 302--acre estate residential area generally located., between Ellis and Garfield Avenues and between . Gothard S treef. _, l the City boundary west of Edwards Street. �� There area rn��'.r,or of potential. constraints to development in this residential area including topography, oil uses , ownerships, community facilities, and access problems. At the request of :,- • City 'Council, staff prepared a conceptual study of the area (Ellis- ''`` '' ` :, Gol:denwest Area 'Conceptual Study, May, 1981) which addressed these, potential constraints •and . outlined a number of 'development ob jec- tives necessary-to ensure. coordinated residential ' development ,that maximizes the . areaIs . potential to provide unique open space and Sw. �» ,. e . eview of the conce tual . stud Aft r r . . recr�atir►n opportunities. p Y .�? lan the Planning Conunission directed staff to prepare a spec ' f 'c p fo a area to im, lement the estate residential . des . nation. r. -the P 9 Staff -is currently working on the specific plan .and anticipates completion •of.:a final draft by January, 1982 . Any rezoning of property. in the Ellis--Goldenwest area is - premature at this time any' may .detract from the specific plan ' s ability to meet the objectives A: tt' contained in the conceptual study. ,f The..,proposed 'zone change would enable development on lots as. small: : 1 as Be 000 square feet st.Abject. .to the standards regarding lot with, -street -frontage, yard requirements, . and othei specifications con '° ` tained in the Rl district. This could result .in a .development . . "14 ' " `L having slightly ,larger lot sizes . but . which is otherwise similar in : : appearance to atypical single-family subdivision . Due to they size of the subject property and its central location in the estate residential area, this type of development pattern may not be desirable.• A coM arison. of a typical single-family layout with a slightly clustered. conficauration is shown in . Figures la and lb for a hypo- t;ho,tical , piece of property developed with the same. number of units . The city' s RI district: would allow the first type of layout: (Figs ,:ure :la) but would not permit "the second pattern (Figure W . , 1'he �tt:tic' development type, however,, may be more appropriate in rsCvldenwest - due to he th E porti e desire .'.to. preserve . e- t " ZC 81-3 . ; October 6',' 19 81 .`''•;� ,, •Page. A ... ' •�Vry; , ; ''`� • c en ,space, ,. retai.ti. ,the , e�:zstin tv o ra h and create view and :., P . . g:. . . P g p y trail "co' rid ors . The Ellis-Goldenwest specific plan will contain } " development standards that can accommodate a variety of develop f=3,Jy` merit :patterns, including uniform large .lots. aiid..clustered lots. ")' '`• y The specific plan will identify areas in which, one 'or more; of. these .. . ,��� 4 y•: 'development types are-most appropriate based 'on an areawide analysis; of desired "open space corridors , equ.:strian areas, and unique topographical. features..' j yr�3vi` As mentioned, previously; the subject property and surrounding '•4 �% properties are currently unserved by City' water, sewer, and dr ''in- t age facilities. Offsite improvements will most likely ire .`rQquirea ' •. #7`t ' toconnect , the subject property to existing facilities outs.;.de : the. Ellis--Goldenwest area. -The cost of constructing these facilities . ..�� .: •r to their ultimate capacities will most likely 'be prohibitively '' expensive for any single developer. If individual properties, ' how :.ever, are allowed to install temporary, undersized facilities, inefficiencies and • repeated disruption •of property and. .streets.. ^� may occur. - A ,. Similarly, the Ellis-Goldenwe 'tst area lacks an internal . sye of collector streets. Individual parcels are :each allowed to take ' access off the neares`t -arterial , a large number of " access points;:' :.:.:.. -will be created resulting in traffic disruption and safety hazards, and an excessive also, inner parcels may be difficult tc access, ''✓ A :. amount of the Ellis-Goldenwest area trey be devoted to stxeet ,fcx)tage, The s i)ecific •plan currently being prepared kill delineate ,the appro- '' T"'�? priate .alignment and necessary capacities. of all major public' " ..works facilities and collector streets needed to . serve the Ellis-. ' = Goldenwest area. The plan• will also propose a method to coordinate a Y the financing and construction of these facilities that is equitable to all property owners. ` Staff il:commends that the existing zoning be retained for .the follows:g reasons : 1) The requested zoning would limit options . ` = available to the City regarding the provision of open space, com munitry facilities, access , and circulat{,on; 2) Staff is currently preparing a"specific plan for the area which' will • impelmenti the r 'r..�.. objectives - contained in the Ellis-Goldenwest Conceptual Study; 'and 3) The existing RA-0 zoning, by prohibiting further land subdivi- sion, is the most appropriate designation for the subject property: until such time as the specific plan is completed. J4rv; •. " t 7 :D RECOMMENDAT10N 4 The staff recommends that the Planning Commission reject Negative ` Declaration 81-26 and require that an Environmental Impact Report ..r. : be prepared: for 'the project. 5taf£­further recommends. that the Planning' Commission deny Zone Change No. 81-=3 or table until ., completion `of. the required . ExR or the Specific Man, based on the b following findings: ''ZC i I--I/ND 81--26 rr S t � '+ ; i ':"october ti, 1981 t # FINDTNOS JOR DENTAL: l: The 'requested zone change o`n the sub;iect property wotiild, limit► f � + options. .avai:.able to the ".City ` n e , the estate residential ara 0} , � =ti,13 regarding : the, pcovis;:on of open space, community facilities, 7. access, 'and circulation. Z• `' The `request'i�d zoning is one of a number of possible.^xoning r°2;r "designations...,. the 'existing RA-0 '.designation,, ,that r could' be' �con�sidered "consistent ' with the' Gcne' al Plat. for, the 'i r:�` ' r `► subs ect property. •.."Adequate environmental assessment has not been completed or the grog ect. ' ar A JWP:CI z dr Attachments: 1 . Area Map 2. Site Plan '• L'.., 3. Figure re 1 g -. . 4 . Ordinance 1 j 1 { r 1 + I A. Ar 166 � ... y' • / 1. 4• W �. _ �wa�.e�rs�■raw.■wr■r�.o�Fra�.r:� rra��+r+rarr�■■�ar�. 11 1320± 11 , -, LEW . ? R t It Pcu boom -VI ■■ = •• I ."' j✓Sx:�y( 4• Ott t` .y` � ..�4�r`}Si'._ Y t. 4ttII ' -'4,t; •, ( •y if. ,' . 4 tr`y§rc' Minut'es, [2i�• P1ing .Cammision r; .,November Page`1`3 tt �'•t''� 4+S+f t , +r ter.^ t } .1 ? , t i .. .' ,. The next two- agenda items were combined for public hearing f by-',the::.`Commission. t _ � t i ZONE CHANGES 8y1 3, AND 81 'll Cont.. from 10."6-81) <, PipP 1icant Lindk org/Dalil Investors;-' Ir;c. 'j ZONE CHANGE N0. 81 3: To permit a chane. o£ gone from_ R14-0 to "+Q;;1-6�8,:000 on :Pioperty..;loca6id 'on 'the : side o'f Edtirards t � + ` Street .'approximately. 100 feet south` of :Ellis .Avenue•. _ . 'i ZotjE CY_ANGE NQ. 8'1!-il' To ,permit ,a change -of :zone from 'to :Q-Rl-0=CD--15 �000 on' propexay located '`on the .south side of Ellis Avenue ` approximately g00 feet '.west of Golden' est r -.= Street. , '::Carol - Inge briefly reviewed 'the applications ., She :pointed oUt that .they are ;located within an urea - for which staff is . repay- f K , ing., a specific plan which. is,:antici*pated to., be f inished iin January of,; next year. In staffs opa.na.on;:approval 'of these zone .- change would: prejudice 'that :plan "and. might encourage "other proper ty.:onwers'. in the. area to apply for similar changes-, in zon in in :a vi.cinit which '3taff "€eels is not `ready for .sul�divition Y.; g ,. „z ., .; , ,., at :.this, dime. Commissioner "Porter requested : tc .know •'how many {; staff: hours are estimated ':� be put into: the plan .:and Yihat ,per-- centage 'of 'the plan is preFQntly;=cazipleted. Ms . Tnge replied it 2: that. no :aa:�ly 'of ,hours is ,;Uvailable at this. time, but the plan : IS' Appro�timately , 50 ; peicent complete. The public heari' ►g was opened on bo..h requests. David Wahl, applicant, addressed the Commission to urge approval r; of his. requests that :'the delay has .already. been very costly and further delay_'.could preclude. him -from 'being- able 'to, meet. his;:`planned„maximum 'density of four units to ' .the, acr.e.`, or fxom including equestrian . facil'ities within his developments,, ch'.'he ' now 'plans to-do.., He informed --the Commission that ifr ' .his ,zone. changes 'are approved he will plan, a project consistent 'with -the :.General. Plan. concept of estate an iig,, with clustered ,j f housing, �low� density, narrower stre�:ts, Iess :antensiv' public, . . '. im rovemen is .-'etc �­-In ,response to 'Commiasioner Porter ' s request for his .reaction -to , het.."Q" .prefix: on his zonin p g, ..'Mr. Dahl replied `.that he 'wel-�. %comed the .qualified zoning designation. ,D6veA]:3.lbra,ght, representing the Environment I ' noard, spoke 4ii 4 'the '4omimission ::to say that` the. noaid opposes . tiny. changes to z the' Ge`neral•. Plan-.-in this* area,•. which it:.feels hag been`.udei uat'' r covered:,through rather studies: He• urged •the Planning Commission approve the 'zan6 -changes 'and . allow the property to develop c S �accardng, tC) ic:is existing; General Plan 'desi'gnation. :r Liriailoc�n, 17161 Gol�renwPst Street, an attorney: representing t: x Fqu 'stran =Tra`ils; Ync. ,' ::apok in' support .of '::;�s:`requests ar,'d urged,i�heir approval'.. , 13--: . 11-3-81 — P:C: .kt ' `Minutes; ' H -H. 'P1an`r,1.; ., om mi.saian f•";'r '.NvYember 3:' 1981 ' + � .,rte a .:.. rr: ( ,'•.t r ,. 7a a'. Al `�eXll::, 20292,,EaRttwoon, Circls, Hint.tngton Beach 'Called the :propcisal _., `ofr,,the ,,applicant a .unique: 16pportunity for; the" City `to .:preserve ` the equestrian uses within :the .City and also `to• diversify 'the res :dental mix `the 'commu,nit can rovide. He recommended sts,. a rovcl.:conch tinned Y P.. PP to properly ,�integrate: the concepts 'asked for .in 'the : forthcoming . Specific plan. ` r". a 'followi'ng :persons ,also spokN i'n favor "of granting the requests , cttie . same reasons as , previously given: r Douglas' Griffes, Georgia; Street, k ��untington Beac`ti r Kim Hunt, . 16891 -B . Street, . Huntington Beach' ` June;' Nash (presentin4' a 'apeech' prepared. by sue, Springer? ` Connie Mandi'c Y :The public .'tieasing `,gas closed. > Commissioner Bannister left the meeting 'at .10: 50 ' p.m. The r..ommission discussed how .best. to .preserve: the characte' ristics o"f* the, existing sites . through . the , allowable condi ti'oning under the ` "Q''. 'designation; how grade dffereritials�.could 'be retained,:- and 'what the equestrian: staic3ards in= the code - required for - square footage of lots. f ' Precise wording �o accompl•ish the above goals; was extensively `dis- cussed. . ON MOTION BY. PORTER AND;: SECOND BY, PAONE NEGATIVE ' DECLARATION NO. 61-426 WAS_ APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING' VOTE: 'its/ '.: -'• - .. .. _� •, , :AYES. • Kenefick, Paone, Win' heZl ,' Porter, Schumacher, Mahaffey NOES:. : None � ;; �11BSEN1`: :. aannister - ABSTAIN: -None ... ON MOTION*'BY PORTER AND. SECOND . BY'* KENEFIC.K ZONE, CHANGE NO. .n1- 3 ,..',WAS;.-APP,RO.VED; FOR''REC.OMMENDATION, TO -THE ' CITY 'CGUNCZL FOR ADOPTION ` WITH THE FOLLQWING` FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY .THE FOLLOWING VOTE: .FINDINGS: : Z'he zanirig 'of this : property to Q-�R10-0 , 000 is ConsiStorit Wlth the Huntington: Beach General Plan;. and is compatible with land use ;designations "for. surrounding. Properties,. ' CONDITION'S ':OF THE "Q" : ZONING: 1. An future iro ect. a'PP roved • for thin ';'parcel cf` land< sh P7all make provisions for ;equestrian', 'ses • ���ithin�-the development. . Y, �. Variat .on .in tgpography, shall „be 'provx.ded in the. devehpment plan ({ implementing this coning. Tn varticular, a sw�.le through the ' 1 r;',"'�'.4 '✓`+ :�, ,Property., iha�I]. be.'provided which approximates the .'dime ns fons -of_ ` ;the existing tswale: :{ z�, , -14 - ll--3-81 - P.Cf , { 5 F N y t- ar � .. • �, ... t ;a f , a .. ": t - , 15 l ,i 11 J� y• hSinu es, N:B. Pf i.ng 'Comrniss on er may. 3 Development of ttii.s ,pYircel shall, to as great a degree as .prat cal`,; be com atibl'e with-,the ro osec3 "s ec�tfic lan ;oein re aced ttie :area. 1 j Levelopment`of khis',parcQl ' shall allow fQr : a.nnovation in ,types--and placement of housing in; `thel project. x `t ;j Any future projectproposed for this property :Ahall be sub jest 'to'•'the -;filing and approval of a' conditional ` use' permit. � AYES' Kenefxck, Paone, Winchell,: porter, Schumacher, Mahaffey ti None ABSENTS bannister ABSTAIN: None t ; ON sMOTION, BY'.,PORTtR. 'ND,,,SECOND BY. SCliUMACHER NEGATIVE. DECLARATION N0:. 81-41 WAS APPROVED BY THE FOLLGWING. VOTE: AYES: Kbhefi,ckr Paone, Winchell, , Porter, Sch uma Cher, Mahaffey NOES: on t AHSENTi 'Aanniet:er f• ABSTAIN. n.D N o e S ON,'M4TIQN`BY_ PORTER.' MD.- .SECOND BY SCIiUMACHER ZONE. CHANGE . NO: t- .fllwll.:WAS':APPROVED rOR RECOMMEND�aTION :T0 THE:; CITY ' C�7UNCIL FOR , • APPROVAL',WITH .THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS BY THE ' {jY FOLLOWING VOTE:' FINDINGS: :: ; z` .. T l., tie zanin of:this r rt t o e o CD- 5 0 1--0 1 0' is c­ntent .-R p o si• g` P Y . 4 s with the.Hun��ngtvn:`Beach General Plan and is . compatible with ' �1� s land :.use :d'esignations for E ie surrounding properties CDNDITIdNS 'OF THE "Q" 'ZONING: .e., -5 t. future-.project. approved fore this parcel of -laSnd : shall 'make provisions '.for equestrian► uses Within 'the'"development. ;4 ' 2. Development of thi`s'.parcel shall , to as great a deijree as pracw tic al, . be,''66ipatible"w' ith the proposed specific plan being 4 'r prepared.: foi' the area. ;f y ` Development of this parcel shall allow for innovation in types: ; ti ana pla cement`of the `housing in the project. r ,4 Y y' f`• F{. '' ' • ' AnY.h future ;project "proposed for.-,this property" shall be- subjec- _ 1. J to ,the. fi'J.iti and approval :"of a conditional use perm pp : P r Kenef ink', Paone, . Winche Il Porter Schumacher Maha f f e ` } : NOES:l None Y 3 �3a,nnfater T. i; "'s t` t�STAINi Nona H B Planniric .Comm3s6ion, sx , .N��tember• 3 '1981 ; ' rr,r ( SPEC-IAL,,'SIGN TERMIT. NO. 81�-5 •' `Apl'icanLs rGarfield Bank !' w . Savoy,, Hellavia aniiounced.:.that .`ap pca '11.. nt. has submitted a ,.letter . of- , ;r 1 w3.thdrawal `on 'L•his ,'request. By 'consensus the Commission accepted ._ the Applscant' s ,request to. .withdraw Spek-.ial ''Sign' Permi; No. .81-5. ' ?r CnDE• AMEND14ENT NO. 81-15 - sit; t ,• "'"• ." ". " . ;. .. , r + y An amendment �,to Azticle 979 , Parkirg 'Requirements, of the Huntington t Heath Ort3inance .Code. Said amendment: will•:amend,,the requirements •:per taining ro physical protection `of fencing •'and landscaping. ,f a:.fit_ . �- .. , ' a,_ ;' _ .:. .. t..,, .•.. - '-, •. .. •., , - _ �„?,,. ..;.: - ..: .'. - ;•:. ..,. .:;:. .. .,. . MOTION BY PORTER AND SECOND: BY SCHUMACHER ,CODE AMENDMENT' WAS CONTINUEDI Td.,THE;MEETING OF 'NOVEMSER 17 , 1981, -BYUNAN.IMOUS t ;..-•:VOTE1 OF ,THE. :COMMISSIONERS PRESENT. SCUSSION ;::ITEMS r ' CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT INO, 80-1 equ, ' t t :of ` A R n 1ppoa Cm3a i ex re , - hem onernone ssed his- feelin : that the zes ons . on .9 quostion `of:`whether''or not the Commission • could reconsider, 'a n xtam '`f' ait�er .action "had .been taken was riot 'adequate. After dis'cussi.on, ' k Legal: :couinsel` was instructed to:, provide a :mo.re 'dEsfinitive opinion .,to guide this :Commission; this `opinion was requc�?�:ed for the next , meeting. dN. MOTION .BY: KENEFICK AND 'SECOND: BY , kON'E THE REQUEST .FUR: AMENDMENT j ► TO C4NDI;ITONS QF `APPROVAL` FOIZ CONDITIC?NAL' USE PERMIT NO. ,:80-=1 WAS, a' CgNTINUIwD' TO. THE MEETING".OF OF NOVEMBER 17, 19 81, EtY THE FOLLOWING VOTE;--,S AYLS:` Kenefick paone, . Winctiell, Porter, Schumacher IJOESi None , .. - . ' :-'ABSENT: Bannister,. Mahaffey (left the meeting " at 11: 00) ABS AIN:- :None ON kZC7TION BY: FAONE 'AND,,SECOND BY, SCHUMACIIER:'AGENDA 'ITEM E-2 (CODE . ^ AMENDMENT.. NO. . 81.--1U).';a9AS CONTINUED .TO THE 'MEETING OF .NOVMEBER 17; . 1.961,: BY.. :THE FOI,L0 NG VOTE: ' I 'AYES '-., Kenefick, Paone, . Winchell , Porter, Schumacher j Y NOCS one ► t ,, ' 11HSEI�T: :13annisEer, ' MAhaffey �' ,l �' ABSTAIN s •Ncine Thew wai9 no farther: business an thc. m:.eting ad�ourn`d : t: 11. 55 p.m. , <r . to.,a study cession ;to be held gat 7:00 ,p,m.. November 3,0, a 981. r ;ht.' }?a n, Secretary Grace H, Wa:nGha11, C a drman rlr" sdf r,, «1G- • 11-�3--81 � P.C. e • CITY.OK.HIJNTINGTON 8 bEVEC&MENT lERV' ES dEPARTMEfdY ' P:`C3, Baii`19D t �� Iiuntington:t3sich, CA. 926" rw�ti;r,arti rr a u Tel: 171 4}5:3&5271 17 ENVIM MENTAL INFORMATION 1:QRM Fee $105 .00 k FOR CITY USE ONLY L 71-- i7 el Date , Annl.icant Authorized Agent ^~. Received: S�t' -Qlh Project �.C3 ptip �C ��� t Number: 'l1cf-tR_PIh 2 �A. Department df �Origi'n: Mailinu Address 4 .. i Other AipliGations . ar ,TeeP one Permit Numbers : Pronerty Owner 4 " f!ail'ina. ,Address/Telep on j l 4� � --�b3 3 ' TO Project �Information (please attach Plot Plan and submit photographs 'o.f. bject property) " 1. 1 .Nature of Project Give complete ' descrption of :the. proposed , Pro-sect: ` a..�.. Location of Project. .(AdOress, 'nearest intersections) 1�,7C�iP" ? :;i:y f' a� t4�5 . , .c.,c-.,F(t::el C k. 4 ti� hsessnr.''s . Marcel 'Number: o' Z:cav--� b 11� �.ci4 �'� "' -� Q,�..k-{ t t,. �G�i�—` CSt�t -t. cf►(Z 0 o hC{ F lxn,5�?W.�' ,•/ .. f f �4-4 j •�, l• ghat is`.'the ,present . zoning on :th'e� 'property? + �'� -• � `-, ;: t{ 1'. 5 What is ttie surrounding land- use to :'the: . Northt = .,�'�:. � 1 �+�1!'�� �•t��. _Lc. if V :.....�ri►. t 1. 6 If the project is commercial., 'o,r industrial ,give': a complete. description of a"ctivi ties and other; .pertinent :informata.on 'ificlud� ng but not :'limited• to 'estimated `employment ;per shift.: . 'and any potential hazardous materials which may be used, etc. ' - Sul �- . -_ . . ' . • . 'j'r- 1. 7 If the ''Project ;is residential, :-indicate nuanber, types and size "of 'units and associated facilities. . .:.11/,^., 1 �'•�•IMl1..�1 Q-C`31•UL"t�1C� • . • . ' If"the project is institutional indicate the major function, ,. e estimated employment per shift and maximum occupan^x Project land area (acres to hc•n�'`� Number . of: parking' "sbaces �?� • j 1.1Q Square feet of building area �•r,��. Numbetr of, floors Height of - tallest structure involved in the 'project Ki'&7. Z.0 Environmental Setting Dlrain'ago: and,. Flood Control ,i) t'14�asv dc±scrihe : how o.n-•site 'drainage wily be accantmoda,fed . , �+w�rww..,.w w��rrrr.w ■r. .w. n .,..�..w.w... . _ + C orm a) zs the Tito presently :graded? C:5 rr b) xndicat:e ttie iqross cubic �yaras of grading projaose'd `S'1�`bc�� the.i-acres 'of ".land td be graded , the amount 'earth to be :transported on, th'e site ?. , and the ainount'`of, earth. �o . betransported `off the . sitF },r c' ) what wi].1 be the maximum heigYit and grade of cut or.- f1.1 r ; .: • - �} .. after craning is completed? :Soils `_< t a) Type 'of. so�`ts . on the subject �.te7- ' �Suvitsi:t soils report i :if .-a`vailable) , C��hy t S{�vu�'� SeI�S •{Lc�F, c�cdr� i f ,t 7€ .�,1L�'y (tCCt'nt�,}�y1�'�LScr� Sti't3�.�fic��• CC�����s .. 2. 4 Vegetation ' �Yr a) _. Attach .,a man ' indicating• the location,' type an. ..:size , of trees locate�i on . the site:.. Indicate below the number.', r type anc . size` of trees to be removed: -as a result of the e. . pro'*ect. 5 c5 M�`"� �2 i.b W U CFr'E'7"AT(�►� 2:5 Mater .-Quality a) ' Does an ,ortion of the project abut or encroa�:h on beaches, y Y P estuaries , bays , tidelands , or inland water areas?: !U Q b) 'Describe how the ..'project will. effect any ��body �of water.. . . IrT' w t �.�.. t.:0`�" ..t'�=�E.�x •� � ;a'fi t.uVtf l�-- - ' "Air nuality a)' If''.°the 'project is industrial , describe and list .air t pollution sources and quantity and.•types of -pollutant.: emitted'` as a result of the project. 2::7 'Noise tinYDO Dos�cribt•' adjacent o,f f-site nois.c. sources Ui.. e r+.. wluirts , intitistry , freeways) /u0 ►�'c� rni i .so will lie 1 oduced by . the prgjoct'' I f . available . ivr.. noise .levels i,n deca.ble mc�asurernent and _ t}•Fical ft mo. distritiution.,when noise will 'be pro•ducerd , j t `�r(br,,rt ;� 1 •i r; y rf t -..,,, ! t. '( t fat. llow,will j noise:`produced by the project 'compare';with existing, noise 'levels? 8f ,''::3' TrafFi : Y ", �11`pp oxima t,(Ay how .much. •tray i,c will be generated `by the .project: rIr e Try+ (rhe::.on , `vehicul ar .:trips per day � '`r`tiE�ttil.cp�� r� } 50 250 vet�icula= trips per day ' k- 6isIfax DC C-A0 Cj 250 500 vehicular trips • pnr clay". ,S giver 500 vehicular trips per .d":'v ;rp�iblxc Services and Facilities r 3:'1 `Water z t. a� •Will the 'project require installation. 'or repiacemEnt of t wa ter. Iiii i 4 `t t zo b) Please estimia.te •the 'dailX volume in gallons required `to ` ~ serve the project. ' t st A 3,�2 .5ewex a) Will - the project require installation or replacement `of' `nesv:'sew.ar .1`ines?' iJw`{��c7t-�� (yt.�..�4' +L. 431S` please ni'dica l e • the approximate amount :of 'sewage. generated iq,i from bhe :project. bf► -- u VA a) I,f' lrtae : project 'is .industrial , describe the type a'nd f az.ount ' (pounds/8ay) of" solid waste �ge.nerated by ' t"he proIec . . Social ; , onu.i�it ion Uis Iacement r # l any residential occupants be Aisplaced . by. tie •project 1)i�3c ' eofildingri1e : ha or :smpxnvemunts laC 4 vniol bit'. the pt=oircC . , `` (��. t t} • ` .4 ;: k., y � • ,.:`",.� � ' fir.. �� ... 4•'' 5 `0 • Mitigating Measures ;. t Are ' there measures ;include'd in, the ro 'ect whx ch 'ma conserve P, ] . Y: . nonrenewable, ;resources. -W-9 'electricit ', gas, .water)? . Please 'des`cribe. +-� Ii d -�.-. w c� ►arc,- 'C-C�` �.:�p�:� Ar • t,.ri+ • G�4Vt _eAJAh't,wrJ bell kt cn W ► -.. tryt iieD .•.: Are there measures included in ,ttie project wha.ch;would 'protect " > nor enhance •flora and r fauna?. "Please 'describe. r3 `r L 11> r,5 h- %Ar-- pc"/I n,s kJ 1 {„ S . Are ,, there measures proposed. in the design of. the projeet `to ` reduce noise pollution?. Plea{se do cribe ; YYq w.t-t�!,� R��11L.''t,tt-�. 4'tw(�c►e\VY��". �FA�..t3■ •'\eya►, .'PYWC\._ :1 M s�,t.�z te-� .w� « �S� t�S c:� •,tom 'R.C:b u C� 't.fD�s� 5 4 Are ,ttiere measures proposed in th 'design o'f the prjecto (e. g, architectural treatment and '°.landscaping) which .have R been coordinated with "design 'of the existing community.'tc` minimize Visual effect? Please describe , w_y 1�* ldtr o t L. W % L c. kt: .�'=C'iC�. l,• S� 5t ��►:c-� ("Uvcr i�►- { my�nt� 1 C L< -h>� C:f'+JM S cat,-v.MOZ) 505 , :- Are there measures vroposed in the design of the project to reduce *dater pollution? Please describe, . 5:51tt Are "there measures proposed which would reduce air pollution? 1 �,ist any Air Pollution Contxol District equipment required, t„ 5..7 Are there measures or facilities designed into the' :project to facilitate resource recovery 'and/or energy conservation : (e.g. '•.-solar heating, special insulation, etc. ) ? . Please describe. IL., ? Nic• YZ�:c� �d-cam tousuch �c.ta' .cT u �iu���++%►���tr .. r�„ �p�h : � x.. . t Sch� vshCLKr- L o (t.u,MTttJ �c.c"S. W LC_ , . t 5 . 0 Alterna t i vex ` 6 . 1 Are there alternatives to the project , which may result n a = t -lesser adverse environmental effect?. Please explai��" ail . proj3c>r s attern"atives on '.-i'n :attached sheet. n/b " � f 3' 'T; :I eri�l�y ertify �h. ;fie i.nformati:on,'here n is true and'.acciurate: to. 't-he liC% of my kn le'dn _ Wig pa tureurD , . •Date F ilecy ,t t'h t}.'� t tt y t • Ir . t `� • ----