Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZONE CASE 82-15 - NEGATIVE DECLARATION 82-40 - GENERAL PLAN Agthonzed to Publish Advertisements of all kinds including public notices by Decree of the Superior, Court of Orange County California Number A-6214 dat W29 September 1961 and A-24831 dated 11 June 1963 1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA PUBLIC NOTICE j County of Orange PublK Notice Advenumg coved - NOTICE OF by this effldev w m r point PUBLIC HEARING n a a wrath 10 pKe column wWth APPEAL BY COUNCILMAN JACK KELLY TO THE PLANNING 5� 'gym„,a �ryxrr I am a Citizen Of theµ United States and a resident of COMMISSION DENIAL OF ZONE CHANGETt* _ the County aforesaid, I am over the age of eighteen NO 82-15/NEGATIVE DECLARATION 82-40 years, and not a party to or Interested in the below (RI-0-CD TO entitled matter I am a principal clerk,of the Orange NOTICE CIS-PHEREBY � GIVEN that the Huntington ••• Coast DAILY' a public h PILOT, with which is combined the Beach City e Council will hold he Beach In the Coun- NEWS-PRESS, a newspaper of general`circulation, cll Chamber at the Hunt- Ington Beach Civic Center, F - . printed and published in the City of- Costa Mesa, <2000 Main Street,—Hunt'= y_ mgton the date and California,at the timCal on .'' County of Orange, State of California, and that a Indicated below to receive �" l Notice of PUBLIC HEARING `. and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the apple- cation described below i DATE Monday, Septem- ber 15, 1986 / of which copy attached hereto is a true and complete SUBJECT APPEAL To copy, was printed and published in the Costa Mesa, ZONE CHANGE N o {� 82-15/NEGATIVE DE;CLAR- Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, ATAPPELLANT JACK Irvine, the South Coast communities and Laguna KELLY,Councilman APPLICANT City of Hunt Beach issues of said newspaper for ONE TIME Hunt- ington Beach LOCATION North of Utica Avenue, south of Yorktown consecutive weeks to wit the issue(s) of Avenue between 17th Street and Lake`Street PROPOSAL Appeal filed by Councilman Jack Kelly to, Planning Commission denial - F of a request to change the September 4 198 6 zoning on approximately 9 acres from R1-0 (Single Family Residential-Oil Suf- fix) and R1-0-CD (Single 198 Family Residential-Oil Suf- fix-Civic District) to R2-0- CD-P,D (Medium Density Residential-Oil Suffix-Civic C 198 ;District-Planned Develop- f ment Suffix) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS Negative Declar- 198 ation No 82-40 needs to be considered by the City Council prior to action on the zone change ON FILE A legal descrip- 198 tion and a copy of the proposed ordinance are on file In the Development Ser- a Vices Department ALL INTERESTED PER- I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the SONS are invited to attend foregoing is true and correct said. hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above All appli- cations, exhlblts,A and de- September 4 198 6 scriptions of this proposal E uted on are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main at Cos Mesa, Califor I Street, Ijuntington Beach, California,for Inspection by the public HUNTINGTON BEACH ,J CITY COUNCIL, By Alicia Ig ature M Wentworth, City Clerk, Phone (714)536-5405 Published Orange Coast Daily Pilot September 4, 19L—86 Th059 A,�p PRCQF OF PUBLICATION Environmental RRoard CITY C i' 4 ! CITY OF HUNTINGTCd`t1T .�CH � HUNTINGTON BEACH Post Office BoxgU(g6XTON Ez:"C''"INutftington Beach, California 92648 Qh I Sri 11 2 91 tG I`L;. !il^ Q9 SE� 1� � D OF leaTo : Mayor Mandic and City Council Members C'Cloy COUTINGTpIV BeACH From: Environmental Board NC1L. OFFICE Date : September 12, 1986 Concerning: General Plan Conformance 86-8, Gone Change No. 82-15/Negative Declaration No. 82-40 Dear Mayor Mandic : The Environmental Board would like to recommend that the City Council uphold the Planning Commission' s denial of General Plan Conformance 86-8, Zone Change No . 82-15/ Negative Declaration No. 82-40. Also , we recommend that the General Plan be brought into compliance with the R-1 zoning in this area. A medium density , walled community on this site would be a disruption, not a buffer. The Civic Center is buffered by scenic grassy areas. R-2 to the north and east are buffered by the arterials Yorktown and Lake. The sound of police sirens and helicopters will not be buffered by housing of any density. This site is a natural extension of the R-1 neighborhood across the local street Utica. The Negative Declaration 82-40 was done before Pacific Rancn was built and does not address traffic caused by that project . Vacation of 17th and Pine would result in giving the Huntington Beach Co. approximately one acre of land and in the elimination of approximately 15 parking spaces in the immediate future. At the present time the grass triangle of land at the corner of Main and Utica gives a parklike appearance to the Civic Center as you drive north on Main. A walled community on that spot would seriously diminish the visual appearance of the City at that corner. The Environmental Board can see no benefit to the City from passage of either of these actions. Sine ely, Dean Albright , Chairman, Environmental Advisory Board co, i NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL BY COUNCILMAN JACK KELLY TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO 82-15/NEGATIVE DECLARATION 82-40 (Rl-O-CD TO R2-0-CD-PD) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, September 15, 1986 / 7 : 30 PM APPELLANT: Jack Kelly, Councilman APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach LOCATION: North of Utica Avenue south of Yorktown Avenue between 17th Street and Lake Street. PROPOSAL Appeal filed by Councilman Jack Kelly to Planning Commission denial of a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres from R1-0 (Single Family Residential-Oil Suffix) and R1-O-CD (Single Family Residential-Oil Suffix-Civic District) to R2-0-CD-PD (Medium Density Residential-Oil Suffix-Civic District - Planned Development Suffix) . MMENTS• 16r �- r 3� 0 gned f NOTICE -OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL BY COUNCILMAN JACK KELLY 'TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO 82-15/NEGATIVE DECLARATION 82-40 (R1-0-CD TO R2-0-CD-PD) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, September 15, 1986 ./ 7:30 PM APPELLANT: Jack Kelly,, Councilman APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach LOCATION: North of Utica Avenue south of Yorktown Avenue between 17th Street and Lake Street. PROPOSAL Appeal filed by Councilman Jack Kelly to Planning Commission denial of a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres from R1-0 (Single Family Residential-Oil Suffix) and R1-O-CD (Single Family Residential-Oil Suffix-Civic District) to R2-0-CD-PD (Medium Density Residential-Oil Suffix-Civic District - Planned Development Suffix) . COMMENTS ., Jl 17 / .bl i8 �� �.•fL.Lw//t� �/ �!/ /! 3 r/ 6 J�n1/i1././/69 �Cl° I � " Signed i yG�;,o C/lyC'F/L NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL BY COUNCILMAN JACK KELLY TO THE PLANNING ,QMMISSION DENIAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO 82-15/NEGATIVE DECLARATION 2- "4`0 (R1-0-CD TO R2-0-CD-PD) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, September 15, 1986 / 7 : 30 PM APPELLANT: Jack Kelly, Councilman APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach LOCATION: North of Utica Avenue south of Yorktown Avenue between 17th Street and Lake Street. PROPOSAL : Appeal filed by Councilman Jack Kelly to Planning Commission denial of a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres from R1-0 (Single Family Residential-Oil Suffix) and R1-O-CD (Single Family Residential-Oil Suffix-Civic District) to R2-0-CD-PD (Medium Density Residential-Oil Suffix-Civic District - Planned Development Suffix) . COMMENTS• 0;001 C�iYY Apr t 9 , ��� Signed REQUESI FOR CITY COUNCIACTION Date September 15, 1986 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrat*r - Prepared by: James W. Palin, Director, Development Services Subject: ZONE CHARGE NO. 82-15/NEGATIVE DECLARATION 82-40 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, APPLICANT COUNCILMAN JACK KELLY - APPELLANT IN% +L2_967 Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: This item was appealed by Councilman Kelly following the Planning Commission 's denial on August 19, 1986. Zone Change No. 82-15 is a request by the City of Huntington Beach to change the zoning on property located north of Utica Avenue between Seventeenth and Lake Streets from R1-0 (Low Density Residential combined with Oil Production) and R1-0-CD (Low Density Residential combined with Oil Production-Civic District ) to R2-0-CD-PD (Medium Density Residential combined with Oil Production - Civic District - Planned Development. ) This request has previously been before the City Council . The project went before the City Council on appeal and on December 6, 1982 , the Council continued the public hearing to a date uncertain until former Councilman Pattinson received a ruling from the Fair Political Practices Commission and the Attorney General 's Office regarding a possible conflict of interest and directed that re-notification be made at that time. Recently, staff had requested that the Council re-introduce the item and direct staff to re-notice and set it for public hearing. On July 21 , 1986, the Council referred the zone change request back to the Planning Commission . In addition to newspaper publication and a 300 ft . radius notification to all property owners, staff mailed notices to all property owners in the residential subdivision to the south of the subject site down to Adams Avenue. t PIO 4/81 *1009 The request is diffeOnt from the one that was *ore the Council in 1982 in that the area at the northeast corner of Main Street and Utica Avenue (currently the lawn area at the southern tip of the Civic Center site ) is proposed to be part of a medium density planned residential development . A proposed agreement between the City and the Huntington Beach Company would call for exchanging this portion of the Civic Center property for a parcel of land located near Yorktown Avenue and Lake Street for expansion of the Civic Center property in this area . The land, which will be more usable due to its size and location, may be used to provide additional parking in the future. The Analysis section of this report goes into further detail on the project . In addition, Attachment No. 1 shows the boundaries of the request . The proposed zone change is within the Yorktown-Lake Redevelopment Project Area, established in 1982. Consolidation of parcels and the exchange of property was one of the major objectives identified at the time the Redevelopment Plan was adopted. A memorandum from Redevelopment Agency staff is attached to this report. RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission action and recommendation on August 19, 1986: ON MOTION BY ERSKINE AND SECOND BY PORTER, THE PLANNING COMMISSION VOTED TO REAFFIRM THEIR DENIAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. 82-15 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 82-40 BASED ON FINDINGS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Rowe, Winchell , Livengood, Erskine, Porter , Mirjahangir NOES: None ABSENT: Schumacher ABSTAIN: None FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1 . The proposed density is not compatible with surrounding residential area. 2 . The proposed "PD" suffix would only compound an existing parking problem in the area and the circulation would not be compatible with the existing neighborhood. 3 . The proposed density of 15 units per acre is not in harmony with the surrounding area, is too intense, and would have a negative impact upon the existing low density residential neighborhood to the south, which is of a unique and special character . 4 . The proposed zone change would be detrimental to the health, welfare and safety of the adjacent neighborhood. The Planning Commission also recommended that a general plan amendment be initiated to change the area bounded by Utica, Lake and Seventeenth Street to a Low Density Redidential designation. RCA - September 15, 1986 -2- (6135d ) Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Zone Change No. 82-15 and Negative Declaration No. 82-40 based on the following findings: FINDINGSFOR APPROVAL: 1 . A change of zone from R1-0 (Low Density Residential District combined with Oil Production) and R1-0-CD (Low Density Residential District combined with Oil Production - Civic District ) to R2-0-CD-PD (Medium Density Residential combined with Oil Production - Civic District - Planned Development ) is consistent with the General Plan designation of Medium Density Residential . 2 . The proposed zone change is compatible with surrounding land uses which include properties zoned and General Planned Medium Density Residential, property used as a Civic Center facility, vacant land, and existing single family dwellings located south of the subject site across Utica Avenue which would be buffered from the Civic Center complex by a project on the subject property. 3. The proposed zone change to facilitate a planned residential development will not be detrimental to the general health, safety and welfare of the community because there is a requirement for a public hearing and conditional use permit for any development proposal to ensure that all concerns related to the architectural design, height, open space and site layout are addressed. ANALYSIS• zone Change No. 82-15 is a request by the City as part of a proposed exchange of property between the City and the Huntington Beach Company whereby an approximate 1 . 2 acre parcel of land owned by the Huntington Beach Company, located at the southwest corner of Lake Street and Yorktown Avenue, will be exchanged for a city-owned parcel of land located at the northeast corner of Main Street and Utica Avenue to accommodate future development of a planned residential community totaling approximately ten acres . In addition to the rezoning, the City has requested the vacation of Pine Street between Seventeenth and Utica, all of Seventeenth Street within the boundaries of the project, as well as adjacent alleys . Circulation around the civic center will be accomplished from Main Street and Lake Street using a portion of the existing Seventeenth Street right-of-way. A conceptual plan is attached to this report . RCA - September 15, 1986 -3- (6135d ) i In reviewing Zone ChOge No. 82-15, staff has Atified the compatibility of the proposed zone change with surrounding land uses as a major issue. There is medium density residential development to the north across Yorktown Avenue and to the east across Lake Street. An R2 (PD) district would also be compatible with the Civic Center site to the north of the property. An R2 (PD) development would provide a greater buffer for a civic center complex. Single family homes located across Seventeenth Street from the civic center would not be as compatible as an R-2 planned development project. The area to the south of the subject site is zoned R1 and primarily developed with single family homes . The proposed project will serve as a transition between the single family character of the properties to the south and the Civic Center . The consolidated residential project, with Pine and Seventeenth Streets vacated, will discourage through traffic from the Civic Center from entering the single family neighborhood to the south . The planned development (-PD) suffix will maximize control the City has over the specific development project proposed. A medium density residential project should be able to be properly designed to be sensitive to the existing homes to the south through setbacks , open space, landscaping, variations in height and controlled points of access . The suffix requires that any project conform to the requirements of Article 915 for planned residential developments and further requires approval of a conditional use permit and tentative tract map by the Planning Commission. This process would include subsequent notification and a public hearing as well . Zone Change No. 82-15 will bring the majority of the property into conformance with the General Plan designation . All of the property easterly of Seventeenth Street has a General Plan designation of Medium Density Residential (maximum 15 units per gross acre) which is consistent with R2 zoning. For the parcel of land involved in the exchange between the City and the Huntington Beach Company at the southern tip of the Civic Center site, the current General Plan designation is Public/Institutional . The proposed exchange of land would involve a property of similar size at Yorktown and Lake. Since the two properties to be exchanged are approximately equal in size, and since the parcels in question are both generally one acre in size, no general plan amendment is necessary prior to action on a zone change to a base district of R2 . As a follow-up to the zone change, the general plan could be amended to show the new configuration of the Public/Institutional designation. RCA - September 15, 1986 -4- ( 6135d ) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : The proposed project is covered by Negative Declaration No. 82-40. Action on the Negative Declaration needs to be taken by the Council prior to action on the zone change. FUNDING SOURCE• Not applicable ALTERNATIVE ACTION: 1 . The City Council may wish to consider a density lower than that of the regular R2 designation of fifteen units per acre . The Council could specify that the maximum density be twelve units per acre, thus the zoning designation would be R2-12-0-CD-PD. In addition, a qualified classification (Q) could be used to condition the project such that all units along the Utica Street boundary be a maximum of one and two stories in height . 2. Deny Zone Change No. 82-15 and Negative Declaration subject to the findings of the Planning Commission. ATTACHMENTS 1 . Ordinance 2. Planning Commission staff report dated August 19 , 1986, including: a . Area Map/Conceptual Site Plan b. Negative Declaration No. 82-40 C. Memo from Redevelopment Staff JWP:JA: jr RCA - September 15, 1986 -5- (6135d ) CITY OF H UNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL COMMUNIC .N HUh TINGTON BEACH TO Mayor and City Council Members FROM Co`ufi } Ja,tk.KeIIy SUBJECT APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION'S DATE ust 1986 DENIAL OF GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE NO. 86-8, ZONE CHANGE NO. 82-15, AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 82-40 I hereby appeal the Planning Commission's denial of General Plan Conformance No. 86-8, Zone Change No. 82-15, and Negative Declaration No. 82-40. The proposed zone change from RI-0 and RI-0-CD to R2-0-PD is compatible with the existing land uses and will serve to facilitate a planned residential development which will serve as a buffer between City Hall and the existing low density residen- tial area to the south. A planned residential development will allow for a rational use of land that will encourage good architectural design and site layout, open space, and sensitivity to building height and bulk. The general plan conformance will find in conformance the proposed vacating of streets and alleys within the proposed zone change boundaries. The vacations will create a consolidated site for a planned resi- dential development. JK:pj C � 9 `O �,y We the undersigned residents of Huntington Beach urge the city , council to deny zone change no. 82-15 and retain the existing R1-O and R1-O-CD zoning on the property. NAME ADDRESS 2 . ��7;" /1 fn_ 0�.t��2.�2 j�D 7'�'���/h�6 L 3 . 4 5. 6 l g2Z MAIN I,-T - kt 9 . 10 11. � 12 13 . 14 15. i 16. 17 . fell 18 . t 19. 20. 0 3 . 21. Le 1',2 2 2 . 2 92, 7 A ! 'n 24 . Y I MIN I _ .s -WAOA i- �_ I )L / I Petitions submitted in opposition to the proposed zone change are available in the City Clerk's office. 77nu7�/Pig T'Tl,/. 1,�I�-I IN PAW I PP!11_ P111111111TITL �. " 1 11 �ffffif0 . Z- i o I 4C ;p \�� �. OF � I C 4✓o L4KA wwwjo t y y • 0 GAFF huntington beach development services department EPOR TO: Planning Commission FROM: Development Services DATE: August 19, 1986 SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE NO. 82-15/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 82-40 APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach REQUEST: Reconsideration of a ZONE: R1-0 and R1-0-CD request to change the zoning from R1-0 (Low Density Residential combined with oil Production) and R1-0-CD (Low Density Residential combined with Oil Production, Civic District) to R2-0-CD-PD (Medium Density Residential combined with Oil Production, Civic District-Planned Development Suffix) LOCATION: North of Utica Avenue ,GENERAL PLAN: between 17th Street and Medium Density Residential Lake Street and Public/Institutional ACREAGE: 9 + acres EXISTING USE: Vacant/Oil Productions/Portion of Civic Center Complex 1 . 0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Zone Change No. 82-15 and recommend approval to the City Council . 2. 0 GENERAL INFORMATION: Zone Change No . 82-15 is a request by the City of Huntington Beach to change the zoning on property located north of Utica Avenue between Seventeenth and Lake Streets from R1-0 (Low Density Residential combined with Oil Production) and R1-0-CD ( Low Density Residential combined with Oil Production-Civic District ) to R2-0-CD-PD (Medium Density Residential combined with Oil Production - Civic District - Planned Development. ) AdtX C- 8 A-F M-23A This request has previously been before the Commission. On November 2, 1982, the Planning Commission denied Zone Change No. 82-15 with a slightly different configuration. The project went before the City Council on appeal and on December 6 , 1982, the Council continued the public hearing to a date uncertain until former Councilman Pattinson received a ruling from the Fair Political Practices Commission and the Attorney General 's Office regarding a possible conflict of interest and directed that the re-notification be made at that time . Recently, staff had requested that the Council re-introduce the item and direct staff to re-notice and set it for public hearing . On July 21 , 1986, the Council referred the zone change request back to the Planning Commission . Staff readvertised the zone change as a public hearing for the meeting of August 19 , 1986 . In addition to newspaper publication and a 300 ft . radius notification to all property owners , staff mailed notices to all property owners in the residential subdivision to the south of the subject site down to Adams Avenue . The request is different from the one that was before the Planning Commission in 1982 in that the area at the northeast corner of Main Street and Utica Avenue (currently the lawn area at the southern tip of the Civic Center site) is proposed to be part of a medium density planned residential development . An agreement between the City and the Huntington Beach Company would call for exchanging this portion of the Civic Center property for a parcel of land located near Yorktown Avenue and Lake Street for expansion of the Civic Center property in this area . The land may be used to provide additional parking in the future . The Analysis section of this report goes into further detail on the project. In addition, Attachment No . 1 shows the boundaries of the request . 3 . 0 SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS: Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential , Public/ Institutional ZONE: R1-0 and R1-0-CD LAND USE: Vacant, Oil Production, and portion of Civic Center Complex North of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential ZONE: R1 and R1-0-CD LAND USE: Vacant East of Subject Property: (Across Lake Street ) GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential ZONE: Old Town Specific Plan - Dist. Two LAND USE: Machine Shop, Vacant, and Oil Production Staff Report - 8/19/86 -2- (5910d) South of Subject Property: (Across Utica Avenue) GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential ZONE: R1 and R2 LAND USE: Existing Single-Family Dwellings and Apartments West of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Public/Institutional ZONE: CF-C overlay with underlying zoning of R1-0 LAND USE: Civic Center Facility 4. 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: At its meeting of November 2, 1982, the Planning Commission approved Negative Declaration No. 82-40 assessing the environmental impacts of the proposed zone change. 5 . 0 COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable. 6. 0 REDEVELOPMENT STATUS : The proposed zone change is within the Yorktown-Lake Redevelopment Project Area . Redevelopment staff is in support of the request and is working with the Huntington Beach Company in facilitating a planned residential development on the property. (Memorandum attached) 7 . 0 SPECIFIC PLAN: Not applicable . 8. 0 SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE: Not applicable. 9. 0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: Zone Change No. 82-15 is a request by the City of Huntington Beach to change the zoning on property located north of Utica Avenue between Seventeenth Street and Lake Street from R1-0 ( Low Density Residential District combined with Oil Production) and R1-0-CD (Low Density Residential District combined with Oil Production - Civic District) to R2-0-CD-PD (Medium Density Residential District combined with Oil Production - Civic District - Planned Development. ) Staff Report - 8/19/86 -3- ( 5910d) Zone Change No . 82-15 is a request by the City as part of an agreement between the City and the Huntington Beach Company whereby an approximate 1 .2 acre parcel of land owned by the Huntington Beach Company, located at the southwest corner of Lake Street and Yorktown Avenue, will be exchanged for a city-owned parcel of land located at the northeast corner of Main Street and Utica Avenue to accommodate future development of a planned residential community totaling approximately ten acres . In addition to this exchange, the City has requested the vacation of Pine Street between Seventeenth and Utica, all of Seventeenth Street within the boundaries of the pproject, as well as adjacent alleys . General Plan Conformance No. 86-8 addresses this aspect of the proposal . In reviewing Zone Change No. 82-15, staff has identified the compatibility of the proposed zone change with surrounding land uses as a major issue . There is medium density residential development to the north across Yorktown Avenue and to the east across Lake Street . An R2 base district would also be compatible with the Civic Center site to the north of the property. An R2 development would provide a greater buffer for a civic center complex. Single family residential zoning is not appropriate adjacent to a five story civic office building. Finally, the area to the south of the subject site is zoned Rl and primarily developed with single family homes . The proposed project will serve as a transition between the single family character of the properties to the south and the Civic Center . With the planned development (-PD) suffix, a medium density residential project should be able to be properly designed to be sensitive to the existing homes to the south through setbacks, open space, landscaping, variations in height and controlled points of access . The developer is studying the possibility of having just one entrance to the planned community which would be from Lake Street . The planned development designation proposed as a suffix to the zoning will maximize control the City will have over the specific development project proposed. The suffix requires that any project conform to the requirements of Article 915 for planned residential developments and further requires approval of a conditional use permit and tentative tract map by the Planning Commission . This process would include subsequent notification and a public hearing as well . Zone Change No. 82-15 will bring the majority of the property into conformance with the General Plan designation . All of the property easterly of Seventeenth Street has a General Plan designation of Medium Density Residential (maximum 15 units per gross acre ) which is consistent with R2 zoning. Staff Report - 8/19/86 -4- (5910d ) For the parcel of land involved in the exchange between the City and the Huntington Beach Company at the southern tip of the Civic Center site , the current General Plan designation is Public/Institutional . The proposed exchange of land would involve a property of similar size at Yorktown and Lake. Since the two properties to be exchanged are approximately equal in size, and since the parcels in question are both generally one acre in size, no general plan amendment is necessary prior to action on a zone change to a base district of R2. As a follow-up to the zone change, the general plan should be amended to show the new configuration of the Public/Institutional designation. It should be noted that the overlay shown on the district map of CF-C ( Community Facilities - Civic Uses ) is not a zoning designation, but is placed on properties by the Director to indicate the land use of a site . Should the zone change be approved and the exchange of land take place, the district map would be altered to show the CF-C overlay on the site of the Civic Center expansion at the southwest corner of Yorktown Avenue and Lake Street. This would appear on the map with the underlying zone of R1-0 shown in parenthesis . 10 . 0 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Zone Charge No . 82-15 and recommend adoption by the City Council subject to the following findings : FINDING FOR APPROVAL: 1 . A change. of_ zone from R1-0 ( Low Density Residential District combined with Oil Production ) and R1-0-CD (Low Density Residential District combined with Oil Production - Civic District ) to R2-0-CD-PD (Medium Density Residential combined with Oil Production - Civic District - Planned Development ) is consistent with the General Plan designation of Medium Density Residential . 2 . The proposed zone change is compatible with surrounding land uses which include properties zoned and General Planned Medium Density Residential , property used as a Civic Center facility, vacant land, and existing single family dwellings located south of the subject site across Utica Avenue which would be buffered from the Civic Center complex by a project on the subject property. Staff Report - 8/19/86 -5- (5910d ) 3 . The proposed zone change to facilitate a planned residential development will not be detrimental to the general health, safety and welfare of the community because there is a requirement for a public hearing and conditional use permit for any development proposal to ensure that all concerns related to the architectural design, height , open space and site layout are addressed. ATTACHMENTS• 1 . Area Map 2. Draft Ordinance 3. Conceptual Site Plan 4. Negative Declaration No. 82-40 5. Letter from Barbara Letson dated August 11 , 1986 6 . Letter from Sandra Oldfield dated August 13, 1986 7. Memo from Redevelopment staff JWP:JA: jr Staff Report - 8/19/86 -6- (5910d) CiTY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH L� 'I INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HVNTINGT(NV MACH To Michael Strange From ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES Assistant Planner SECTION Subject NEGATIVE DECLARATION Date October 15, 1982 NO 82-40 Applicant City of Huntington Beach Reauest Change of zone from Rl-O-CD to R2-0-CD Location North of Utica, between 17th and Lake Streets Background Based on the Staff's initial study of this project a Draft Negative Declaration was published in the local newspaper and posted in the Office of the City Clerk for a 10-day public review period ending 10/18/82 and no comments, X the attached comments were received Recommendation The Environmental Resources Section recommends that the Planning Commission approve Negative Declaration No 82-40 M findinq that the proposed project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment Mitigation Measures The attached mitigating measures will reduce potential environmental effects resulting from the project and are recommended as conditions of approval Respectfully submitted, James R Barnes Associate Planner JRB/dc CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION MurrnNcroN MACH Jeff Abramowitz Stephen V. Kohler To From Assistant Planner Principal Redevelopment Specialist REDEVELOPMENT COMMENTS: August 15, 1986 Subject ZONE CHANGE NO. 82-15 Date I am in receipt of your memo of August 15, 1986 requesting comments on the subject zone change. I would like to provide you with the following information: 1. The Redevelopment Agency staff for sometime has been working with the property owner in the subject zone change to create a land exchange agreement. This land exchange agreement was one of the major objectives at the time the Yorktown-Lake Redevelopment Plan was adopted. At this time, a draft of this agreement has been presented to staff and will be forwarded shortly to the City Attorney's office for review. 2. This draft agreement includes three (3) "Conditions Precedent" to exchange of the property. These are: a. Abandonment of Pine and 17th Street (with reversion to surrounding property owner). - - b. Satisfaction of the subdivision map act requirements for the creation of new parcels (one to be granted from the city to the property owner; the other, to be granted from the property owner to the city). c. Successful rezoning of the property pursuant to the request to be forwarded to the Planning Commission on August 19, 1986. Therefore, it appears that the approval of the subject zone change would be consistent with the objectives of the Yorktown-Lake Redevelopment Plan. Such a zone change is also a condition precedent to the exchange of parcels which is also an objective of the Redevelopment Plan. It is important to note that the draft land exchange agreement enjoys no "official" status at this time as it is still under review by staff and has not been executed by the Redevelopment Agency. This draft agreement appears to conform with discussions and negotiations with the property owner to date. i As always, I appreciate the opportunity to comment on entitlement requests within Redevelopment Project areas. If you should have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at X5542. SVK:sar 0044r sa w►w..+WO Owatn m an -- - -- - - 177i71minrnn,mL,, `7i�I���"�� i 0 ePARK it f l l" LPaws BUD 1111111111 I111TL �/ �-II�II II�IIINIINII!�D , uo g!a � i • Publish - 9/4/86 D13 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL BY COUNC JACK Y TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO 82-15 NEGATIVE DECLARATION 82-40 (RI-0-CD TO K2-0-CD-PD NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE: Monday, September 15, 1986 TIME: 7:30 P.M. SUBJECT: APPEAL TO ZONE CHANGE NO 82-15/NEGATIVE DECLARATION 82-40 APPELLANT: Jack Kelly, Councilman APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach LOCATION: North of Utica Avenue, south of Yorktown Avenue between 17th Street and Lake Street. PROPOSAL: Appeal filed by Councilman Jack Kelly to Planning Commission denial of a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres from Rl-0 (Single Family Residential-Oil Suffix) and R1-O-CD (Single Family Residential-Oil Suffix-Civic District) to R2-0-CD-PD (Medium Density Residential-Oil Suffix-Civic District-Planned Development Suffix). ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No. 82-40 needs to be considered by the City Council prior to action on the zone change. ON FILE: A legal description and copy of the proposed ordinance are on file in the Development Services Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. All applications, exhibits, and descriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, for inspection by the public. HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk Phone (714) 536-5405 Dated 9/3/86 ZG NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 4P Oac - N ; ZONE CHANGE N0. 82-15 � fCr DEC BL�o '\ (R1-O-CD TO R2-0-CD-PD) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach Planning Commission will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center , 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach , California , on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. /S' DATE/T"ME Tii��- _ ' °, 1986 , 7 . 00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Zane Change No. 82-15 � NEB vEc_ g2-S(O 4P#A6L[.AA) T r)^C /T r� CputiGj APPLICANT: City of Huntington arch "'a4� LOCATION: worth of :Utica Avenue soutn of Yorktown ?:venue n et„e n' e 1 A c egc and Lake Street nE UEST• :.J��.cr-a -o= of a eouest to cnange :ne zonina_ on approxir,ately , acres from RI-0 (Single Family Residential-Oil Suffix ) and RI-0-CD (Single Family Residential-Oil Suffix-Civic District ) to R2-0-CD-PD (Medium Density Residential-Oil Suffix-Civic District-Planned Development Suffix ) . U'Pn=r-s— t-em--w-.s . aontinued1to`aw da.t-e-;,un-certa.in on - December 6,-=1982.E ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No. 82-40 weep '- -� �p a r. r O - ta- G 'fi t G�c f / efr � t. � . �u_y'r ��Q ON FILE: A cop of t'�e p_ oposed o:dinance is or. file ir, the r/ Department of Development Services, 2000 Main Street , 7�0 -.C41-v Huntington Beach , California 92648, for inspection by the public. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing, and express opinions or submit evidence for or ao_oir,st the application as outlined above . If there are any further questions please call Jeff Abramowitz , assistant Planner at 536-5271 . James W. Palin , Secretary Huntington Beacn Planning Commission. ( 5824d-1 ) NOTICE TO CLERK TO SCHEDULE PUBLIC EARING ITEM Z C- TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE DATE: FROM: PLEASE SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING USING THE ATTACHED LEGAL NOTICE FOR THE ' DAY OF 198 (O AP' s are attached P's will follow No AP's Initiated by: Planning Commission Planning Department Petition * Appeal X<" Other _.. Adoption of Environmental Status (x) IR NO NONE Has City Attorney' s Office been YES NO informed of forthcoming public X hearing? Refer to A , , Planning Department - Extension 45" for additional information. * If appeal , please transmit exact wording to be required in the legal . IS THIS AN APPEALABLE DEVELOPMENT (COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT ? / X YES NO AC62J301/FM CTL 0004574 05-24-85 8:49 PM 1985-86 CITY/DISTRICT PARCEL LIST PAGE 1, DISTRICT NUMBER: 054A HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME. AND ADDRESS CODE TPA NAME AND AUDRESS CODE 023-010-10 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO 023-010-21 MANSION HILL 023-020-14 SCHOOL, HUNTINGTON BEACH 04-001 PROPERTY TAX 04-001 3030 S BUNDY OR 04-001 UNION HIGH P 0 BOY. 7611 LOS ANGF:LES, CA 90066 10241 'iOuKTOYIN AVE SA14 FRANCISCO, CA 94120 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 ,23-010-12 HUNTINGTON BEACH- CO 023-010-22 MANSION HILL 023-020-15 F1l1NTT1lGTON BEACH CO 04-001 PROPERTY TAX 04-001 3030 S BUNDY OR 04-001 11POIll RTY TAX P 0 BOX 7611 LOS ANGE LF!,, CA 90066 P 0 1,'0X 7611 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94120 5AM YP ANCISCD, CA 94120 023-010-13 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO 023-020-03 SCHOOL, HUNTINGTON BEACH 023-020-16 CI7Y OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 04-001 PROPERTY TAX. 04-001 UNION HIGH DIST 04-001 2000 MAIN ST P 0 EOX 7611 1902 17711 ST 111111TINGTO!l BEACH, CA 92648 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94120 HUNTING111 BCH, CAI. 92648 i 023-010-15 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ' 023-020-05 SCHOOL, HUNTINGTON BEACH l ' 023-020-17 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 04-032 P 0 BOX. 190 04-001 UNION HIGH 04-OC1 2000 MAIN ST HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 15,02 17TH ST HUNTIkGTOII BEACH, CA 92648 IfLINTINGTH BCH, CAL 92648 1 • 023-010-18 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO 023-020-06 SCHOOL, HUIITINGTO14 BEACH 023-031-01 HUNTINGTON BEACH COMPANY 04-001 PROPERTY TAX 04-001 UNION HIGH 04-032 PROPr-RTY TAX P 0 BOX 7611 1902 17TH ST P 0 PDX 7611 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94120 HUH1114GT14 OCfI, CAL 92648 SAtl FItANCISCO, CA 94120 023-010-19 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO 023-020-07 HUNTINGTON BEACH COMPANY t 023-031-02 HUNTINGTON BEACH COMPANY 04-001 PROPERTY TAX. 04-001 PROPERTY TAX 04-�32 F!toPCPrY TAX P O 5OX 7611 P O EOX 7611 + P O 'SOX. 7611 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94120 SAN FR.,NCISCO, CA 94120 f� SAII 17!;ANCIS:O, CA 94120 023-010-20 MANSION HILL 023-020-09 SCHOOL, HUNTINGTON BEACH 023-031-03 11UNTINCTON BEACH CO 04-001 3030 S 50110Y DR 04-001 UNION HIGH J 04-032 -110 Ht.Itl ST LOS ANGELES, CA 90066 19011 17TH ST I!L'NfItlG'rCN BEACH, CA 92648 HUili ItIGTN IlCfi, CAL 9?648 1111,1iY0` �'R"K, .j+7,. .,(,ji,,"♦,I.�Ii:v. d... ,.•O.',,e,fd•.r-f., ,.+ :+. +.,.. .. ..,'t r.a.. +. w. .. .+.. a. s•.. . .1 :. .. ..«.,•".h¢p►'A'+r S1+N rd... .:�r�f �r .d i.,11 a .1.. .i�. rq rti .i _ ., ..+v•r..•y,+.•�^'W:'�''�f'tii�•.11{."t�..+. 7,f .. k•...•+a rP..I r. .) itle f.•,i;.r. .. ... .1.r'+w.. �.... .. .da".. l) .. . ACOtJ301//M CIL 4044575 00•t�-66 4149 /M 1965-86 CITT/013TRICT PARCtI LIST DISTRICT NUMBERf 054A HUNTINGTON I•tACh CITY PARCEL N0/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL 110/ 01111EIt5 ZIP TRA NAME AND ADDRESS COO TRA NAME AHU ADDRESS CODE 111A IIAME r.lill /.UDRESS CODE 023-031-04 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO 023-040-10 HUNTINGION 6EACH CO 023-051-04 CITY OF HUIITIIIGTON BEACH 04-032 2110 MAIN ST Ott-032 STANO1 .40 OIL CU OF CAL 0•0-001 .DUO w.I11 51 HUNTINGION 6EACH, CA 92648 PROt't:RTY fAX DIV l II111l1I11�"illll bC:.f.H, CA 92648 I 2314 bU411i ST - ••- •- —• SAN tkl.11C15CO, CAL 94120 1 3-033-01 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 023-040-11 HUNTINGTON BEACH COMPANY 023-051-05 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 04-032 CITY HALL 04-032 PROPEft'f'f TAX U4-001 IOUO 111I11 :.T HUNTIIIGTN BCH. CAL 92646 P 0 bO:X 7611 IIU111IIf41:J11 LEACH. CA 92648 SAN fkAtICISCO, CA 94120 113-033-01 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 023-040-12 HUNTINGTON BEACH COMPANY t 023-051-06 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 04-032 P 0 BOX 190 04-032 PROPERTY TAX 04-001 :1)00 IIAIN 5T HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92648 1 P 0 bOX 7611 ItWs'TII1l11UN LEACH, CA 92648 SAN fkAtICItiCO3 CA 94120 023-040-06 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 023-040-13 HARRELL, W B 023-051-07 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 04-032 HUNTINGTN 6CH, CAL 92648 04-032 NUt;TIIlGTOfI LEACH CO 04-001 LOUD 11AIII 5T PROPERTY TA:: IIUNII1I::IUN LEACH, CA 92648, �f P 0 b0X 7611 '. ( 5AN FRANCISCO, CA 94120 1 ll �023-040-07 HUNTINGTON BEACH COMPANY ` 023-040-14 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO 023-051-08 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 04-131 PROPERTY TAX 04-032 PROPERTY 1A:X 0,,-OU1 2Joo I;;.IN ST P 0 BOX 7611 I+ P G 6OX 7611 hu111IIIl,iON LEACH, CA 92648 SAN FRAIICISCO, CA 94120 ' 1 SA►l i:1:AIIC15C0. CA 94120 1 023-040-08 HUNTINGTONI BEACH COMPAtIY 023-049-01 HUNTINGTON hEACH COMPAtIY 023-052-11 SEAL, NENDALL 0 04-032 PROPERTY TAX 04-032 5Tt.NDARD OIL Co OF CAL U4-001 172o SH.IPLEY ST P 0 BOY. 7611 PROPERIY TAX DIV HUIIINGTUII !:EACH, CA 92648 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94120 t;1151i ST SAN FRANCISC0. CAL 94120 023-040-09 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO 023-051-01 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH i023-052-15 DITTMAR. RICIf-'eD S 04-032 STANDARD OIL CO OF CAL 04-001 2000 MAIN ST 1 04-OUl t505 IIAIN ST PROPERTY TAX DIV HUNTIN'GfON 6EACH, CA 92648 1100I1 LIN LCH, CAL 92648 1 225 bUSH 51 1 SAN FkAhC15CO, CAL 94120 1 l � t' IIY�w�ttfgl►RM1h +EMMpbe�iwfn,!o)P!h'"AP'!!#14� !��H: A P+v t!+•R�1wn.e.+w DISTRICT NUMBIR: OD-,A hU111INGIl.r1 b:ACll C11v PARCEL NO/ CWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWIIERS ZIP PARCEL 110/ U1;IIERS ZIP T NAME AND ADDRESS COUE T R A NAME A140 ADDRESS CODE YRA NAHL A11t1 ADDRESS CODE 023-059-06 ' TON BEACH COUP 023-061-23 COWLING, VERLE A 023-061-34 JOSEPH, PATRICIA A 04-001 PROPER ;,� .,., ' 04-001 1828 PARK 51' 04-001 161y I•INE :if P�-.btf7 61. HUNTING fN L•CH, CAL 92648 HU111IIIC1:: LCH, CAL 92648 .�..•�""�AN KRANCISCO, C 94120 %-N 023-059-07 MU TON BEA GOMtAFfr' 023-061-24 LAUGHLIN, ROBERf S 023-061-35 WICKERSHAM, J E 04-001 PROPERI p 04-001 1630 PARK ST U4-UU1 ST X 7611 HUNTINGTN bCH, CAL 92648 hU11fINt;fa uCli, CAL 92648 SAtI FR:,NCISCO. CA 94120 � ra - _ 023-061 12 HUBBART, ROBERT 023 061-25 RIGGS, MARGARET I TR 023-061-36 WATERS, BARRY L II 04-001 1833 PINE ST 04-001 1824 NARK 5T 04-001 lbtil PINE 5f HUNTINGTH BCH, CAL 92648 HUNTINGTN bCH, CAL 92648 HUII7I11Gf11 bCH, CAL 92648 • 023-061-19 ABBONO, GEORGE F 023-061-27 DAILEY, JOHN C 023-061-37 YAMAZ-AKT, PETER T 04-001 1848 PARK ST 04 001 1620 PARK: ST 04 001 �Uti U'i1CA ST HUNTINGTH BCH, CAL 92648 HUIIfINGTUN bEACH, CA 92648 1iUNT111U1N btlf. CAL 92648 i• 023-061-20 BRUCE, WILLIAM M - 023-061-28 OLDFIELD, DOUGLAS G 023-061-40 CASTLE , JAMES H 04-001 1837 PINE ST 04-001 1o16 PARK 5T 04-001 '11a S Pit Iw,;rIELD ST HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 HUNIINGTN E,CH, CAL 92648 HU11T111G1C11 bLACH, CA 92648 i 1 023-061-21 ARTERBERRY, ALMA A 023-061-30 BUDD, JOHN W 023-061-41 LANEY, KEVIN T 04-001 1615 PINE ST 04-001 1c10 PARK ST 04-001 %IlefllOLDj ESCROW CO HUIITI14GTON BEACH, CA 92648 hUtliItlGftl LCH. CAL 92646 :csUl-r' SI.iN.:llt: bLVD IfA IkVILE , CA 99714 023-061-22 HOSMER, ROGER 023-061-32 WASCHKEIT, ROBERT B 023-061-42 UEPT OF VETS AFFAIRS OF 04-001 1836 PARK: ST 04-001 315 W UTICA ST � 04-U01 LIATE Of CAL HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 11UNTINI—ION BEACH, CA 92648 LE15011, RuuLRT W I:U111106I'll 1,CH, CAL 92648 DISTRICT NUMBER: 054A HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY .� PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NOi OWNERS ZIP PARCEL HO/ OWNERS ZIP TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME Al1U ADDRESS CODE TRA tiAHE A11U ADDRESS CODE 023-061-43 ALFORD, LARRY E 023-062-04 TARZIAN. RObERT L 023-062-16 PfRRY, DAVID D 04-001 1827 PINE ST 04-001 1833 PARK ST 04-001 181[ MAIN ti'f HUNTINGTN bCH, CAL 92646 HUN1INGTtl bCH. CAL 92648 HL111TINCril L'CH, CAL 92648 0061-44 BORNS, ROBERT E 023-062-05 PIERSON, CLARRISSA 023-062-17 CULLUM, DARLENE 04-001 19841 SEA CANYON CIR 04-001 1831 PARK ST 04-001 N 0 I;OX So HUNTINGTN bCH, CAL 92648 HU11TIllGTN bCH, CAL 92648 NEWHALL, CA 91322 023-061-45 BAZIL, ROBERT DANIEL 023-062-07 UUSTERHOFT, PAUL R 023-062-18 D'ARRIGO, ANTHONY PAUL 04-001 1010 PARK. ST 04-001 1617 PARK: ST 04-001 18:15 PARK. Sf HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA* 92648 H(1NTINGTtl bCH, CAL 92648 HU11 1 11164 0U bEACH. CA 92648 023-061-46 SCHRYER, WILFRED L 023-062-08 PUTNAM, MAXINE C 023-062-19 DUNKER, ROBERT H 04-001 304 W SPRINGFIELD AVE 04-001 1b15 PARK ST 04-001 1621 PARK ST HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92648 HUN1'INtuTN bCH, CAL 92648 1lUN11i;G'I'11 UCH. CAL 92648 . 1023-062-01 NICCOLE, DENNIS 023-062-09 RUIZ., STANLEY 023-062-21 FULLMER, tlAY. L 04-001 400 3RD 5T 04-001 1811 PARE: ST 04-001 16�0 HAIN :iT HUNTIN TN BCH, CAL 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 1WHII11GIN I:Cli, CAL 92648 023-062-02 VAN DEUSEN, WALTER L 023-062-12 OGDEN, EDDIE L 023-062-22 BJOR1OAK, STEVEN C 04-001 1841 PARK ST 04-001 153: 11AIll 51 04-001 161•. 114111 S'f HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92648 HUNIINGTH b(:H. CAL 92648 IIU11f111G1(itl UEACH, CA 92648 023-062-03 FOWLER, WILL 023-062-14 STEPHENS, BEULAH F 023-062-23 IIARRILL. MARY E 04-001 1837 PARK ST 04-001 lbli, MAIN ST 04-001 ?z;: flAfN ST HUNTINGTN bCH, CAL 92648 HUIIfINGTN bCH, CAL 92648 II(mlINGfN at:ii. CAL 92648 WAS ef���7e� as t�N1 Q� �iT1/?•71�1i(T, *,��t+. '1:111 +I�r DISTRICT NUIMDQRj 05hA ttU14TINGTON bt.ACH CITY PARCEL NO/ OWNERS LIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS tip , 1 -YR%C"" 1tAt1E"A?1tT-AtiBRf6S tu0(:�_�Zfld____�_.._.t�A1lE_.F.t1U 00RESS CODE IRA NAHE. I.NU AQOQI.S�.r: —Jew ;IS 1 , 023-064-15 FISHBECK. RICHARD A ; 023-064-22 SEIBERT, JOHN C 023-071-02 bOOZ. ROBERT L r if 04-001 1734 PAUK ST ! 04-001 1706 PARK 5T U4-001 17•11 LAVE bf y HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92648 i 11UNTING'Itl bCH, CAL 92648 IIUI11111LIII LCH, CAL 92646 = i 23-064-16 KIBEL, RAYMOND L L023-064-23 SEIBERT, WILLIAM W 023-071-03 REYt1ER, MANY G f 04-001 1730 PARK ST ' 04-001 1702 PARK ST 04-001 1757 LAKL 5T HUNTINGTN bCH, CAL 92648 j HUNTINGTN bLH, CAL 92648 HUNTIIJUTN BCH. CAL 92648 023-064-17 DILLON, JUAN 023-064-24 DENNY, J SHERMAN 023-071-04 PAYNE , STEPHEN MARK 04-001 1726 PARK: 5T 04-001 P 0 BOX 325 04-001 1%33 LAt.E 3T HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92648 1745 PINE ST bEACH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTN bCH, CAL 92648 fi 023-064-18 STUPIN, MANYA "023-069-01 HUNTINGTON BEACH COMP► Y 023-071-05 SUTOAM, HELEi1I E 04-001 1722 PARK ST 04-0 PROPERTY TAX 04-Oul 17?5 LAKE 31 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 P O bOX 7.11 iJ'r hU,,,,NGTN BCH, CAL 92648 At1 IR:.NCI5(:0, GA` 94120 023-064-19 WAITE, NOBLE J. ;,023-069-02 HUNTIN BEACH CO 023-071-06 BU9HARO, 001114A M 04-001 1718 PARK ST 04-001 PROPERT X 04-001 1725 LAXE 5T HUNTINGTN bCH, CAL 92648 .1 P 0 b 761 HUIIfINGTO11 BEACH, CA 92648 1 5A11 PANGISL CA 94120 023-064-20 OSEPIAN, EDWARD 2023-069- HUNTINGTON BEACH CO 023-071-07 PARTION, SHERMAN R 1 04-001 1714 PARK ST !} 04-0 PROPERTY TAX U4-001 1721 LAKE ST HUNTItGTN BCH, CAL 92648 1 P U BOX 7611 11uNf11;GIU LCH, CAL 92648 5A11 ik.4NCIcCO. CA �4120 1 1 023-064-21 PURDUE, STEVE 023-071-01 GROOM, EDDIE W 023-071-08 PLUtIKETT, MARIAN A 04-001 1710 PARK ST 04-001 1745 LAKE ST 04-001 1125•L 1JUNTINj HORN OR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 i. HUNIING'114 bCH. CAL 926461 t1i .;11.C, CAL 92705 , - E 1 \ I c ,.d 4�*wi •�• �!MMI1IM�IMti ,., OIBTRICT NUMBERS C54A HUM11NOTON BtACH CITY PARCEL NO/ DUNE R5 ZIP PARCEL NO/ OUIIERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ owilER5 ZIP TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME A110 AUURESS CUUt 1kA IIAME AHU A;j0lltSS CODE 023-063-23 ZELLER, SIMON C 023-063-30 DEERING, 0014ALO C 023-064-08 CHAMGEkS, STAIILEY R 04-001 1728 MAIN ST 04-001 1724 HAIN Sf 04-U01 171S 11111E :,1 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92648 llUNTIN61"ON bEACH. CA 92648 HU1111►iG1N bCH, CAL 92648 0&63-24 COCHRAN, FRANK k 023-064-02 MOORE , PAUL C 3RO 023-064-09 SHOAFF . CARL T 04-001 1732 MAIN 57 04-001 1717 P111E bT 04-ool 1 /uv 11114 ,1 HUNTINGTH ECH, CAL 92648 ItUtillilGl'U1f BEACH, CA• 92648 HU�llllwltl LCH, CAL 92648 023-063-25 BYERS, CAROL A 023-064-03 DOMINGUEZ, SUSAN LOIS 023-064-10 JACYP' GEDRGE H 04-001 415 CRESCENT AVE 04-001 1733 PINE ST 04-001 5:si:1 TIcUPflf Olt HENDERSONVILLE , NC 28739 HUNTINGION bEAC119 CA 92648 hU1fIIt:Gfto bClf, CAL 92649 023-063-26 GRAVES, RICHARD F 023-064-04 BULLAR, LILLIAN L 023-064-11 HOLMES, KEITH ALFRED 04-001 1708 MAI14 ST 04-001 1729 PINE AVE 1701 HIN4 ST HUNTINGTON LEACH. CA 92648 HUNTING7N GCII, CAL 92646 I;UIITIIIufJN LEACH► CA 92648 �3-063-27 CASCIA, CARL J 023-064-05 PARKER, NICHOLAS J 023-064-12 DE LONG, GUY 04-001 1712 MAIN ST 04-001 1725 PINE ST 04-001 305 CORAL kEEF OR #2 IJUNTI14GTO14 BEACH. CA 92648 HUNTINGION bEACH, CA 92648 hUl1TJl;GT0t4 LS ACri, CA 92648 023-063-28 BIONDI, FRANK J 023-064-06 4lICHNER, KEITH A 023-064-13 HOCKMAN, MICHAEL L 04-002 1720 MAIN 5T 04-001 1721 PINE ST 04-001 17�.2 PARK ST HUNTINGTON bEACH, CA 92648 HUNTINCTON BEACH, CA 92648 NUN'fIt6lN hCH, CAL 92648 023-063-29 ATKINSON, ROSS WILLIAM 023-064-07 TERRY, HONARD B 023-064-14 MEEKS, ARTHUR NAYNE JR 04-001 1716 MAIN ST 04-001 1717 PINE ST U4-OU1 1738 PARE ST HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 HUf1TI1lGTN bCH, CAL 92648 hUlllItlG10N BEACH, CA 92643 AC18170I/►M CTL 000•f83 Of •:l 0! too$-46 CITti0:9T+1:C1 0 4ctl IIiI �AOt yt. y1 DISTRICT NUMBERS 054A MUNTINGTON NtACH CITY + : PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWI4fR9 ZIP PARCEL 1401 owhtlis LI* 'r�' ' TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME A110 ADDRESS CUUE TWA NAMt A11D AUORESS COp! i 023-071-09 KAZMAREK, DON W 023-071-16 MEAD, JACK J 023-071-23 MAR7111, INUNA5 D 04-001 1713 LAKE ST 04-001 1714 PINE ST 04-001 174�f 1.111E tI HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 11UNIINGTN bCH. CAL 92648 ItU171I1tGT11 bt'N. CAL 92648 023-071-10 GILL, THOMAS M JR 023-071-17 BARTLETT, TED W 023-071-24 VAUGHAN. WALTER L 04-001 1709 LAKE ST 04-001 1718 PINE ST 04-601 17:0 1.111E :,T HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92648 HUNTINGTN bCH, CAL 92648 11UarING1N t.CH, CAL 92648 023-071-11 PELOCHINO, JOHN F 023-071-18 ELLIS, GEORGE WILLIAM 023-072-02 MONTOYA. DANIEL L 04-001 ARENDAS, CHRISTINE L 04-001 1722 PINE ST 04-001 1646 LAKE 5f 1705 LAKE ST HUNTINGTN bCH, CAL 92648 HU111ING1'ON bfACH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 023-071-12 MC KEE , GARY FRANK 023-071-19 PINNED, WILLIAM F 023-072-03 CALIFORNIA FEDERAL S i L 04-001 1701 LAKE ST 04-001 1726 PINE ST 04-001 567U WiLSIIII<E 5LVO HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92648 :NU FLOOR LU:i AII..L• LES, CA 90036 • 023-071-13 TART, GERALD E 023-071-20 LIVERMORE , CLIFFORD D JR 023-072-04 HUSKINS, J HICHAEL 04-001 1702 PINE ST 04-001 1730 PINE ST 04-DUI 1642 LAKE ST HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92648 HU14TIN3114 bCH, CAL 92648 11UNIIN610tl LEACH, CA 92648 023-071-14 ZITLAU, PAUL 023-071-21 FARRELL, RICHARD EDWARD 023-072-05 MURRAY. DONALD L 04-001 1706 PINE ST 04-001 1731, P114E bT 04-001 1636 LAKE t,T HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92646 HU11TINVIII ULH, CAL 92648 HUt1-iI11GTON 6EACH, CA 92648 023-071-15 BIDDLE , ROBERT EARL 023-071-22 PARISE , GEORGE ET AL 023-072-06 NETT, GISELA L 04-001 1710 PINE ST 04-001 1i36 PINE ST 04-OU1 1636 LAKE 5T HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON LEACH, CA 92648 i1U1:1'I11G1Ut1 LEACH, CA 92648 ,..,•..FQ:�k :•{'+•r'1••,4 tr' gyp (,'�1�i ; �, s f pit"! flf;••..1f.1-•' :t .� .. _ t. +w�.;�.fit•+.i,..... . '.i .. 1'aY`) + �/� r1�Rt.! lof -c-i l04r114 01•T4., if R1116• rN 140!•11114 r;'f14 10.1j411? fti9;tlw� ltif '. v-. M DISTRICT NUMOER, OD-vA MUNTINGTON OtACH CITT ti;1 i PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS YIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AIIU ADDRE53 CODS: IkA NAnE Auu �uultess C00! 023-072-07 BRIGHTOtJ, RANDALL D 023-072-14 STERN, JOlit; H 2l-073-03 COLLUROVE . LLUALD D 04-001 1832 LAKE ST 04-001 7151 CARL1014 AVE 04-0U1 1742 LAF.E 51 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 LA 92683 1%UH11110 011 LEACH, CA 92648 23-072-08 BRAUCH, WALTER G 023-072-15 ENDTEk, CH Alt LE5 A .. 023-07 -04 GILSANO CO 04-001 1828 LAKE ST 04-001 1806 LAKE ST U4-Uu ;:VILLAQt I14VESTME TS HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 ) HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 1. 0 t;U.i G lyull CA 92713 023-072-09 CALIFORNIA FEDERAL 5 ti L 023-072-16 FERRIS, BRIAN W +, 023-073-05 GI AND CO 04-001 ASSN 04-001 160o LAKE ST I 04-0U1 ::'!: SAGE 1N STMEIITS %CAL FED ENTERPRISES HUNTINGTON bEACH, CA 92648 P u ):•: C-1 011 5670 WILSHIRE bLVD 1fi:Ir: t A 92713 SUITE 940 LOS ANCELES, CA 90036 = 023-072-10 TP.EADWAY, KAREN S 023-072-17 WHEELER, JOSEPH C 023-073-06 HORCASI A GUILLERMO E 04-001 1822 LAKE ST 04-001 1,502 LAKE ST U 4-0 0 1 17j� L :t T HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON UEACH, CA 92648 � llultl II ' f011 EAC11, CA 92648 • 023-072-21 STALL. JOSEPH J 023-072-18 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO 023-073-07 G SAND CO 04-001 1818 LAKE ST 04-001 PROPtlITY TAB 04-00.1 % ILLACE INVESTM NTS HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 P 0 BOX 7611 U t10?: C-1y611 SAN FkANCISCO, CA 94120 IPV114 , CA 92713 023-072-12 CHERNOFF, MARK G 023-07? 11 DUNN, RICHARD E �-�� t023-073 08 BARKLEY. HOWARD R 04-001 1814 LAKE ST 04-001 -1-7,48 LAKE ST / �`1 04-0 1 1ic6 LAKE ST HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON bE(1GHi- CA 92648 hut1l1jf6I014 LEACH, CA 92648 023-072-13 BELINN. CLARENCE E 023-073-82 LLSTATE INVESTORS 0 -073-09 AMERICAII S S L ASSN 04 001 12 81 LAKE ST 04-&0 375 VIAbLO It[) SUITE 200 0`f-001 :: y i I.1 S31-Elt .:VE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 UANVILLE . CA 945 6` 3.c� rLUOR LTL,CI:'t CA 202 ■` DISTRICT NUMDERI 01+•A nuNTINGTON CE Cn Cllr PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWIIERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ ONNEky TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CU n E IRA NAME 1.11u ADDRESS CODE IRA NAME f.I.t; ADDRESS COp[ 023-073-10 AMERICAN S L L ASSH 023-074-01 DAY, HOPE 023-074-06 0 BRIEII. LOUIS M 04-001 REAL ESTATE DEPT 04-001 GREER, HOPE P 04-001 161v LAKE t)I 229 E WEEER 3kU FLOOR 205 UTICA AVE HUIII111G111 LCII. CAL 92648 STOCKTUNo CA 95202 HU11TING111 LC11, CAL 92648 03-0 -11 GILSAND CO 023-074-02 GABALDON, DAVID N 023-074-09 DECKER, H114A J 04-0 %VILLAGE INVESTMENTS O4-001 20:3 NORMAN PL 04-001 1611 LAKE :,T P 0 BOX C-19611 ANAHEIM. CA 92806 ItUliIINGTH LCH, CAL 92648 IRVINE , CA 92713 023-073-12 MM, BARBARA B 023-074-03 PASINI, LORENZO E 023-074-10 OVERTON, THOMAS W 04-001 1 12 LAKE ST 04-001 1837 LAKE ST 04-001 1cU7 LAKE AVE H TINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTII bCH, CAL 92648 HU111111G111 LGu, CAL 99648 023-073-13 GILSA CO 023-074-04 GILLILAND, HOWARD J 023-074-11 NOIITGOMERY, ROBERT A 04-001 %VILLA NVESTMENTS O4-001 1631 LAKE ST 04-001 :vL 511RJUGFIELD ST P 0 BOX -19611 HUNTINGTN bCH, CAL 92648 hU11T111G'fI41 bLri. CAL 92648 IRVINE , A 92713 •023-073-14 GIL NO CO 023-074-05 WITHEM, DONALD L 023-074-12 DEPT OF VETS AFFAIRS OF 04-001 %VI LACE INV TMENTS O4-001 BRUEGGEMAN, LEO J 04-001 STATE OF CAL P BOX C-196 1C1a2 bEVERLY DR hC 5HIA, 1:'OUMAII C (JT) I IIIE , CA 92713 HUIII'1NUf0t1 bEALII, CA 92646 [-O ! b11R111ciFIELD AVE H6t1T111(.T11 bCll, CAL 92648 023-073-1 STATE S L L A5514 023-074-06 MASTRIGHT, JOHN 023-074-13 CREEN, WILLIAM R 04-001 P 0 URAWER D 04-001 17371 DREY LII 04-001 taut, 11I14E ST STOCKTON, CA 95201 HUNTINLIN bCll, CAL 92647 IWOf111G114 LL11. CAL 92648 023-073-16 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO 023-074-07 PRESSON, EARL R 023-074-14 FERGUSON, DORIS M 04'001 PROPERTY TAX. 04-001 1b21 LAKE ST 04-001 14lu P111ti LI '1- P 0 BOX 7611 ltUNIINGfN bell. CAL 92648 IIU.II1t:1;IIt bLII. CAL 92648 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94 0 I, 0I3TR2CT NU118ER1 OD�A hu1,1IN6TON tse ACN CITt PARCEL NO/ OW14ERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS YIP PARCEL NO/ U1+11tR5 LZ11 TRA NAME ANU AUURE55 CO.,t IRA NAME Ant) AUORESS COUE 'T,1A NAMt Aub AuURESS C,00% ' ....1';'aS'-,.My....v•-P_-.t�d�'VWu _ rr+.»..r.r.n.' r+...u.._.r_-..... ...u_.r..r __ '`.{ 023-074-15 WONDELL, OAVID G 023-074-22 MURPHY. RICHARD J 023-061-08 COLLLAHY, IIA111ICK JOSEPH S' 04-001 1814 PIIIE ST 0ti-001 ib42 PIIIE '.,T 04-oul 411 AU:,115 Avt HUNTINGTON EEACH. CA 926�,b 1iUIITIIIG1U11 LEACH. CA 92648 HU11111161Ut1 btACH, CA 9E648 3-074-16 BOLEN, ROBERT 0 023-074-23 REMINGTON, MELVIN 0 ;023-081-09 OU VAL, JAMES L 04-001 1816 PINE ST 04-001 P 0 bUX. 503 04-001 1�0� PARK ST I HUtITINGTII bCH, CAL 92648 HUNTINGTUN BEACH,•CA 92647 HU14fI6;GTON EEACH, CA 92648 023-074-17 BRAVENDER, JOANNA B 023-079-01 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO 023-081-10 GREER, RUBY M 04-001 1810 PARK ST 04-001 STANDARD OIL CO OF CAL 04-001 12u9 PARK ST HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 PROPERT( TAX DIV hUNTINGTON bEACH, CA 92646 + 2Z5 bU511 ST e �.- ..._ SAN FRANC1SCO, CAL 94120 023-074-18 NEWLAND, VIRGINIA THARP 023-079-02 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO 023-061-11 CLAPP, JACK K 04-001 1828 PINE ST + 04-001 5TANDARI) OIL CO OF CAL 04-001 1[lU MAIN ST NUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 PROPERTY TAX DIV HUNTII:G114 bCH, CAL 92648 i a 25 bUSH ST tiAN FR.:NCTSCO, CAL 94120 023-074-19 CROFT, DON 0 � 023-079-03 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO 023-081-12 HOLA, FRANK J 04-001 1830 PINE ST 04-001 PROPERTY TAX 04-001 nGY AH;.115 AVE j HUNTINGTN 5CH, CAL 92648 P U BOX 7611 H1111TI116TU1J br.ACH, CA 92646 FkAIICISCO, GA 94120 023-074-20 BATCHELOR, STEPHEN 0 023-081-06 MILDER, DON 023-081-13 COLLEAkY, PATRICK J y 04-001 1836 PINE ST 04-u01 11:15 PARK ST 04-001 1.11,10 11A111 bl HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 i1111ITI14GIUN BEACH, CA ,92648 023-074-21 TAYLOR, CHRISTOPHER 023-081-07 LAUER, VIRGINIA M 023-081-15 T51ANG, TAN-FUN 04-001 JOSEPH 04-001 1221 PARK ST o4"Jo I ?21L WAIN >T 1840 PINE ST HUNIINCTII bCH, CAL 92648 L•UIIYIiIGT:)N LEACH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 t ,t .it, •.y1..�5.�� � t� i, 71 ,. tti,+.l'�,� .r�r+t°. . . .. ' t', ► i � i' 1 r, ', �' � I���• ', , 1•'.,. + .t., ,,�"l � „t� �f'•� K���•.+:���'{�':'.',/+".�k ��'�`• �•. `,�y. 1 �.,(t.it , i� AI ►�. ,1wom M';`'1•l'�`i., 1 .11''.f,.�•,. 1f t ' `, , � .'�►,h{ �1•li'i,r' V� I,. +' tii ,1 w :i, , ,. _ �0 ��Sf/►1l MTIMR)1AIM�'M+ OMN111 i:�0'r � ,9{� I , I' d i •. I c' �A`� � '. ,�51'�yili,):•'.� "� �� O tTA0 111 PAMCIS L Iu0/ owfteQ16 lt/ IAACs1, %0/ 6"tA0 INA NANO A►60 AOORLfS COOL T4A MAMC A1,0 AODS2111 COOL INA WAT11i A140 AOOA%1% !. 0854 Ott-OO PR93ZLER. LINMARO / 025-0t3-11 M C G A350CIA7E5 025-024-05 MA1131011 HILL 04-002 6631 VIA At.GELI14A DR 0�1-001 2972 CULtkltit,t UR 04-001 SOSO S bUllu'l DR ~t HU1JTIN .1N LC1t. CAL 92047 LUS AL;,II11t.5, CA 90720 Lug AIIGLLLS. C;. 90066 025-022-30 WILLIAMS, DOUGLAS L 025-023-14 C M G ASSOCIATES 025-024-06 HUHTINGTON BEACH CO 004-001 %WILLIAMS, B G 04-001 5832 SUN111bT OR 04-001 PROPERTY TAX 2676 ORANGE AVE RANCHO PAL05 VERDES, CA 90274 P U BOY. 7611 SIGNAL HILL, CA 90806 SAN FRA,11C1SC0, CA 94120 025-022-31 WILLIAMS, CYNTHIA D 025-023-15 VON ELTEN, PETER E 025-031-01 CLELAND, DONALD MILTON i 04-001 ;WILLIAMS, B G 04-001 6792 PRESIDEtITE OR 04-001 tis COLONIAL 2676 ORANGE AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 IRVINE , CA 92714 5IC1lAL HILL. CA 90806 025-022-32 PUTTNER, WERNER 025-023-16 VON ELTEN, PETER E 025-031-02 WONG, GONG Y 04-001 5081 PEARCE OR 04-001 6792 PRESIDENTE DR 04-001 L013 HUNTINGTON ST HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGIUN BEACH, CA 92648 hU14fI14GfO14 LEACH, CA 92648 025-023-06 BERN, LEONARD L i 025-023-17 CLARK, DAVID C f 025-011-03 HARRIS, GERALD J 04-001 7812 LIBERTY 04-001 19731 TOPEKA LN 1 04-001 4'-.65 E b 5T iS HUNTINGTON BEACM,CAL 92647 ` HUNTINGTH bCH, CAL 92646 LOLT011, CAL 92324 025-023-11 VON ELTEN, PETER E 4025-023-19 RILEY, JAMES P 025-031-04 SNYDER, 40BERT 04-001 6792 PRESIDENTE OR 04-001 WESSELMAN, ARTHUR J ET AL 04-001 15541 OC�AtI ULUFF CIR HUNTINGTOII BEACH. CA 92648 2117 AL.46A11A 57 APT 1 HUtlf:ll:l':I 1,C11, CAL 92648 t IIUkTING1011 LEACH, CA 92648 025-023-12 LIO, TIN-MIN 1025-023-21 WILSON, RAYHOND y025-031-07 FARI-MIS S HERCHANTS TRUST 04-001 5021 J'JRUPA AVE APT 1 04-001 %RAFFERTY 4 LLOYD 04-OU1 CO U LDOG bkACH TR RIVERSIDE , CA 92504 ATT11 IIAR 01A COOK 135 E 3111) �1 10101 SLATcR AVE 0102 LUNG DtA,:11. CAL 90802 FI,ui17A1N VALL11, CA 112708 r + (i '� ' � '.+ • �p.''t Syr tt ,,, . r� t•I?.41t•'�t;ti '. r Itl r+ -T'�tF;,,t J.�.P.r. ' v =r t r ! t:rh;tf ,.:'4!'., �I'r�•,•yw ! , t.l'i� �:'� ''�N►�'�IAN�/«� 'M11�.'�'� + 1'. ' r t �.,,'•t� :7�n`•,' tt;•'�t '+�' el,S�i '�+''"t� Xr r,'r�,,..(I ' .c• < ,,1•IRA�f'T:MOI� d�w�tA /I• �A.�et a 40♦ ��� 'i9� fNRlf'l tt#I ,' ..{,�•. ,t,, ::, >'RA NAM! A•i#�p A :11/t 53 c t INA MAP" •No A04ttll toot fwA MAM At A0�{�7 Off-034-t4 LUH, MIttG-RUNG 02+3-034-31 KAO. LUKC 5 OtI-03I-10 WAIN, Ptflt JO„W 04-001 20332 L:.:I4'15LALJ LN 0h-001 5r99 DIRK CIR 04-001 1001 A►ABAMA Ul 61 HUNTIlV'f(:t: t:tiACn, CA 92c :o LA FALlit LA 90621 MUNTIN(olllll 6EACH. CA 402646 , ••i �25-034-26 LIU, TSO CHEN 025-034-33 BUCK, J P 02S-035-11 BYERS, JOHN H 04-001 1676 RHODE ISLAND CIR 04-001 9541 CHEVY CHASE OR 04-001 516 ;;IGIIAL RD COSTA LIES:., CA 92626 HUNTINGTON bEACH,''CA 92646 I+kNPLUT UEACH, CA 99663 • 023-034-27 HOLTHAUS, WARREN E 1025-035-05 SCHLOTTMAN, RICHARD M 025-035-12 GRIGER. MARY LOUISE 04-001 10111 CRAILET DR 04-001 2021 ALABAIIA .:T 04-ODI 921 3«T'H 5T HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 11UNTINGION 6EACH, CA 92648 i 1 025-034-28 COVINGTON, LORAN D ! 025-035-06 BOWDEN. VIRGIL 025-035-13 TRAN, THANG VAN 04-001 17811 MITCHE LL 04-001 3259 ALTA LAGUNA BLVD 04-001 IRAN, I tllml G IRVINE , CA 92714 LAGUNA BEACH, CA 92651 j 1 ;b71 GLCUCESTER LN 11UNIING1014 GL'ACH, CA 92646 025-034-29 PICKFORO, BRUCE J P 025-035-07 ALLAN, JAMES 025-035-14 DISPEIIZA. CARMELO J • 04-001 516 OCEANHILL DR 04-001 ;NiC WILLIAM, RICHARD P 04-001 3104 6ANTA CARLOTTA HUNTINGTOII BEACH, CA 92648 21082 WHITEHORSE LN LA CRt' CENTA* CA 91214 ItUlt'1INGION BEACH, CA 92646 025-034-30 GARDIKAS, DIMETRI G 1 025-035-08 EVANS, DAVID L - t 025-035-15 PEREZ, ARIFL 04-001 18206 LEAF CIR J 04-001 2009 ALABAMA ST 04-001 102U2 BELLLHURST AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 ItU141ING1*011 6EACH. CA 92648 a 14E5'IIIIll3TLte, CA 92683 i 025-034-31 WEISBROD, ALVIN J TR 025-035-09 ANDERSEN, PETER R { 025-035-16 ORENDORFF. JAMES F 04-001 19421 WORCHESTER LN 04-001 RICE , CHRISTIIIE A 04-001 1050 STAIILEY AVE HUNTINGTON LEACH, CA 92646 18131 IVOR'iCREST LN L01iL LEAC11. CA 90804 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 r. ou Y P DISTRICT NUMBERr 054A HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY " PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL HO/ UWlIER5 LI' TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE IRA NAME AIID ADDRESS CODE IRA NAME AIIU AUORlSS C00� `4.. 023-062-24 DANIELSON, LLOYD E 023-063-07 MINNIE . 0014ALD T TR ET AL 023-063-15 BAUER. C A 04-001 1828 MAIN ST 04-001 1747 PARK ST 04-001 1737 PARK $T r HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92648 HUNTINGTON bEACH. CA 92648 HUII7III6114 6CH, CAL 92648 e3-062-25 DRAKE, JOHN F 023-063-08 SPANGLER, LOWELL R 023-063-16 COLSTADT, CHARLES V 04-001 402 SPRINGFIELD ST 04-001 1741 PARK S'r Ott-oul 1742 PAIN 5T HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92648 HUNTINGTNI bCH, CAL 92648 IIUrIIIf.G)ON LEACH. CA 92648 i 023-062-26 RUIZ, STANLEY 023-063-09 MANNING, JOHN F 023-063-17 SMITH. BILLY E 04-001 1605 PARK ST 04-001 1705 PARK 5T 04-001 1734 MAIN ST HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92648 HUNT1NG'fON bEACH, CA 92648 HUNTII.GT(I bCH, CAL 99648 023-062-29 FRAMPTON, DAVID C 023-063-10 GLINES, ALLEN 023-063-18 COCHRAN, DANHY W 04-002 1634 MAIN ST 04-001 1715 PARK ST 04-001 1733 PARK 5T HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92648 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92648 HL)NfIliG1UN BEACH. CA 92648 �23-062-30 PETERSON, JOHN L 023-063-12 EDGINGTON, PAUL L 023-063-19 TAYLOR, MICHAEL A 04-001 1808 17TH ST 04-001 1746 MAIN 5T 04-001 1721 HARD: ST HUNTIIIGTON BEACH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON bEACH, CA 92648 HUNIII<Glil LCH, CAL 92648 023-063-03 LEE. DONALD F 023-063-13 WARREN, MARK E 023-063-20 MILLIKIN, NEIL E 04-001 1711 PARK ST 04-001 2U411 ACRE PL 04-001 1727 PARE ST HUNTINGTN 5CH, CAL 92648 GI(ANGE . CA 92669 HUIITINGTON LEACH, CA 92648 023-063-05 BRAY, BERTHA H 023-063-14 AHRENS, AUDREY J 023-063-22 GIIFFITH, ROSEMARY H 04-001 1701 PARK ST 04-001 1731 PARK 5T 04-001 1740 rl:.If1 51" HUNTINGTN bCH, CAL 92648 HUNTINGTN bCH, CAL 92648 hUllf1i.16"fUll LEACH, CA 92648 ORDINANCE NO. b� I AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 9061 TO PROVIDE FOR CHANG OF ZONING F OM R1-0 (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL/ COMBINED W H OIL PRODUCTION) AND Rl-O-CD (L DENSITY RES DENTIAL COMBINED WITH OIL PRODU ION- CIVIC DISTR CT) TO R2-0-CD-PD ( MEDIUM DENTS Y RESIDENTIAL COMBINED WITH OIL PRODUCTIONS VIC DISTRICT-PLA NED DEVELOPMENT) GENERALLY OCATED NORTH OF UT A AVENUE BETWEEN SEVENTEE H AND LAKE STREETS ( ZON CASE NO. 82-15 ) WHEREAS, pursuant to S ate Planning and Z ing Law, the Huntington Beach Planning Commi sion and Hunti gton Beach City Council have had separate public hearings r ative to Zone Case No. 82-15 wherein both bodies have ca efully onsidered all information presented at said hearings, and of er a consideration of the findings and recommendation of the anning Commission and all i evidence presented to said City C� n ' 1, the City Council finds that such zone change is proper , and consis ent with the general plan, NOW, THEREFORE, the C * y Council of the City of Huntington Beach does ordain as follo s: SECTION 1. The al property desc ibed in Exhibit "A, " attached hereto and i orporated by refere a herein, generally located north of Ut' ca Avenue between Seven enth Street and Lake Street, is hereby changed from R1-0, "Low Den ity Residential combined with 1 Production" and R1-0-CD, "L Density Residential combined wit Oil Production-Civic District" t R2-0-CD-PD, "Medium Density Re dential combined with Oil Productio -Civic District- Planned velopment" : 1 . I SECTION 2 . Section 9061 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, District Map 2 ( Sectional District Map 2-6-11) is hereby amended to reflect the change contained in this ordinance and on the map attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated by reference herein. The Director of Development Services is hereby directed to prepare and file an amended map. A copy of said Exhibit "B" , as amended, shall be available for inspection in the office of the City Clerk . SECTION 3 . This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after its passage. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof on the day of , 1986. Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk _ -City Attorney I REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED: City AdmThistratdt frector of Development Services 2 . E � ! PARCEL "D" Being lots 1 through 12 inclusive , of block 1901 of Tract No. 12 in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange , State of California as shown on the map recorded in Book 9 , page 13 of Miscellaneous record maps in the office of the County Recorder of said County. Containing an area cf 3 . 453 acres more or less . PARCEL "F" Being all of block 1902 of Tract No. 12 in the City of Huntington Beach , County of Orange , State of California as shown on the map recorded in Book 9 , pace 13 of Miscellaneous Record maps in the office of the County Recorder of said County . Containing an area of 4 . 060 Acres more or less . PARCEL "'r"' That portion of Block 1903 of Tract No. 12 in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange , State of California as shown on the map recorded in Book 9 , page 13 of Miscellaneous Eecc:d maps in the office of the County Recorder o said County described as follows : Beginning at the Southwesterly corner of said Block 1903 , said corner being the intersection of the Easterly line of Main Street , 120 . 00 feet in width and the Northerly line of Utica Street , 60 feet in width as shown on said map of Tract No. 12 ; thence North 314 . 00 feet along said Easterly line of Main Street ; thence East 310 . 06 feet to the Northwesterly line of Seventeenth Street , 70 . 00 feet in width, as shown on said nap; thence South 41019 ' hest 418 . 07 feet along said last mentioned line to the point of intersection of the Northwesterly line of said Seventeenth Street and the Northerly line of said Utica Street ; thence West 34 . 04 feet along said last mentioned line to the point of beginning. Containing an area of 1 .240 Acres , more or less. /I N � I .V 90.4 E Zso.Al I 19 � r r '�; � a as• as•_I - - - Imo• �' f'tl RCE' f 4� o Q , ti � V � k4 o . o I _ _ UT/CA Z50J0•- STREET WALDEN & ASSOCIATES, Inc. 4002 west Garry Avenue.Suite B 5k'ETCW TO QCCOMP.4" LEGAL Santa Ana,California 92704 Oe-5cp1pT/ON FDiP 20NE CN.4NGE l (7I4) 'ao-RtStV CIVIL ENGINEERING C/TY OF ,UUNT/NGTON BE4CrfL LAND SURVEYING WO.No OQ;3-00/-21C //31R�. ENVIRONMENTAL f LANNING Date En r. Ep- Chk. Sheet=0t Z Al /00 t — --- I � — N MAIN ,S rRsT r \I \\\ �IH ,,-PA R C E L 3G7.40' p /V 00,OO E 410A CG' PINE STREET" —1 WALDEN R ASSOCIATES, Inc. 40o2 West Garry Avenue,Suite B SKETC<-/ TO ACCOMPANY 1_E6,4L Santa Ana,California 92704 DESCR/Pr/ON FO,P ZONE CI-IANGE (714) 549-R649 CIVIL ENGINEERING C/rY OF yUNTINGTON BEACI--I LAND SURVEYING WO_No Q�73-00/-Z)t ()at. 61I; R(- ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING Engr. �R' Chk. Sheet Z OI 2 SGp�E . 1 IV � I WI �T _ o .1 IiENUE' _ 1 � I - Al VC-00 - 8 19 r 003 i ///j4/ Go �• r ti bhp.01, I g / ►- —- { — U T/C4 � � I S'T�PEET WALDEN & ASSOCIATES, Inc. .5KETfN TO ACCOMo<!NY LEGAL 4002 west Garty Avenue,Sulte B Santa Ana,Calitomla OZta DESC.P/ol/ON FOP ZONE C!/ANGE (714) 549-R649 - C/ TY OF NUNT/NGTON B64CI-1 CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING W O.No 0473-00/-Z7C pate 8//3/R6 ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING p Engr. if^_ Chk. Sheep Of �- REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date September 15, 1986 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council s Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator Prepared by: James W. Palin, Director , Development Services Subject: GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE NO. 86-8 Consistent with Council Policy? [K] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: General Plan Conformance No. 86-8 was appealed to the City Council by Councilman Kelly following the Planning Commission 's denial on August 19, 1986. The request by the Department of Public Works is to vacate Pine Street between 17th Street and Utica Avenue; 17th Street between Yorktown Avenue and Utica Avenue; and alleys in blocks 1901 and 1902 of Tract 12. RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission action and recommendation on August 19 , 1986 : ON MOTION BY LIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY WINCHELL, THE PLANNING COMMISSION VOTED TO DENY GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE NO. 86-8 WITH THE FINDINGS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1 . The proposed street and alley vacation will create -traffic and safety problems for the adjacent single family residential neighborhood. 2 . The number of daily vehicle trips generated by the proposed development after street vacations will cause undue traffic problems for the adjacent neighborhood. 3. The proposed R2 development is not compatible with the existing R1 neighborhood. 4 . The proposed street and alley vacation is inconsistent with the goals and objectives of the General Plan . f� PIO 4/84 AYES: Rowe, Winchell , Livengood, Erskine, Porter , Mirjahangir NOES: None ABSENT: Schumacher ABSTAIN: None Staff recommends that the City Council approve General Plan Conformance No. 86-8 based on the following policies set forth in the General Plan: 1 . Encourage rational use of land and other natural resources ( Land Use ) . 2. Promote the provision of adequate community facilities within the City of Huntington Beach (Community Facilities ) . 3 . Site new City buildings and facilities in areas where existing and planned land uses are compatible with the facility that is being proposed (Community Facilities ) . 4 . Locate residential uses in proximity to commercial and industrial areas and transportation routes to provide convenient access to employment centers ( Housing) . ANALYSIS: Section 65402(a ) of the California Government Code states that no real property shall be disposed of, no street shall be vacated or abandoned . . . until the location, purpose and extent of such acquisition or disposition . . . have been submitted to and reported upon by the planning agency as to conformity with the General Plan . Vacation of the streets noted (see area map) is necessary to allow for future development as a Planned Development by the Huntington Beach Company and the City of Huntington Beach . As indicated in Zone Change No. 82-15, the acreage in the streets and alleys will be consolidated and split (not necessarily along centerlines ) between the City and the Huntington Beach Company. The City will gain some land at the northeast corner of City Hall and the Huntington Beach Company will gain some at the southeast corner . Both pieces of land are approximately one acre. The proposed vacation and land swap will create a consolidated site for a planned residential development and will provide a more suitable location for future civic facilities . At the present time however , there is no proposal for any addition to the Civic Center complex. The Huntington Beach Company is proposing a walled and secured medium density residential development on their portion of the property. RCA - September 15, 1986 -2- (6138d) The proposed residential development will require a zone change from R1-0-CD to R2-0-CD-PD in order to bring the zoning into conformance with the general plan designation of Medium Density. The proposed medium density development will provide a transitional land use between the five story Civic Center and the single family residential neighborhood to the south. The walled community will help prevent penetration of heavy traffic from the north into the low density residential neighborhood to the south . Traffic will be encouraged onto Lake Street and Main Street by the walled development. Pine Street is currently used primarily by Civic Center employees and visitors for access to City Hall parking lots and to accommodate overflow parking. Seventeenth Street is striped to provide 84 parking spaces which are more frequently used when civic center lots are full . There is presently a parking deficiency in the Civic Center (not including Seventeenth Street ) parking lots of about 25 percent during peak hours . The proposed land trade and development project call for the retention of most of the parking area along Seventeenth Street and a new access drive connecting to Lake Street which should by redesign of the parking layout provide additional parking spaces . A conceptual plan will be presented at the Council meeting showing how this may be accomplished. The vacation of Seventeenth Street will require relocating the existing bike path which gets heavy use during the school year by Huntington Beach Union High School Students . A bike lane already exists on Lake Street and a new bike lane will need to be striped along Utica Street. The new route will be slightly longer than the existing diagonal route along 17th Street. FUNDING SOURCE: Not applicable ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Deny General Plan Conformance No. 86-8 subject to the findings of the Planning Commisson. ATTACHMENT: 1 . Area Map 2 . Planning Commission staff report dated August 19, 1986 JWP:PP: jr RCA - September 15, 1986 -3- (6138d ) `A I li CLAY —W—1 , , , n•A.-- -III I u 1 ,•_...-- - , �/ , I ( ADGIt,•T--tlDlt C2-0 Czar• R3 R2ER AVE 3 cz: •F "` R2-0-PD d J o`'''a' �; R2-0 - R2 R4 2 t0 LIME TR 3M RI —�- AVE �j r �gyy+ :R C2-0-CD n so ., ,f0 C2-0 �!j"�! :�$¢pjir; !•)'.-"ij . xRRA cR I R2 w i .4:::aoti' '- q,D n -R2-0-PD::g g:;.., F ..8 o R2-0 RI ,',�a I -loh e LYaLO (/ A TR,f,D MILLIAY5 AV 11 ,254— w I� R2.0-CD ': �W� R2 R2 R2 C2-0-CD RI R5-MD :Rz-0-Po-. 4 R 2 `I R ;;.... ¢ 3 Rz I; C4,R I 210 YORNTVMI v,a•EAVE C2 R2-0-CD C4 • Ti2.. o CF-C R2.0 CF-E-CD (civic GZNTL4) R2-0-CD If RA R2 C2� 8:'.i •.:}!'UN%:iG..il:F^.C'�_1 = ILNITA —.SAVE I o N „-CD-0 Q CF-E-CD° `o o . o �� R2-0 R2 R2 ,wr CA CF-E a CD-0 VENILL 4 Qom. CD 00 0 "°• CD 0 f,o R4 UTILA -- i VE. -CD 01 O TR2 R2-0 Rra U 0 0CF-R RI RI RI RI RI 2 - D-0 OMUNTO A\r. O O O0 O 0 0 N N RI.O` Y AmSAMTEOI R2 C4 SPRINGFIELD r •.y•._ L� O 0 l ALTAWR DR. / N N O O b r" a -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 ` K K N c� S z RI RI RI RI RI R2 -O ROCNESTER A t RO R� Q 1-0 SCALE MI rEEr �!� "�c? R s i a �a a '� R3-0 R3-0 w J (` R2 S RIO RI ADAMS AVE GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE 86-8 -- � HUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION huntington beach development services department o sirAf f REPORT TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DATE: AUGUST 19, 1986 SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE 86-8 APPLICANT: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS REQUEST: Street and Alley Vacation LOCATION: Pine Street between 17th Street and Utica Avenue; and 17th Street between Yo, :town Avenue and Utica Avenue; and alleys in blocks 1901 and 1902 of Tract 12. 1 . 0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Find in conformance with the General Plan. • 2.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Section 65402 (a) of the California Government Code states that no real property shall be disposed of, no street shall be vacated or abandoned . . . until the location, purpose and extent of such acquisition or disposition . . . have been submitted to and reported upon by the planning agency as to conformity with the General Plan. Vacation of the streets noted (see area map) is necessary to allow for future development of the area by the Huntington Beach Company and the City of Huntington Beach . As indicated in Zone Change No. 82-15, the acreage in the streets and alleys will be consolidated and split (not necessarily along centerlines) between the City and , the Huntington Beach Company. The City will gain some land at the northeast corner of City Hall and the Huntington Beach Company will gain some at the southeast corner . Both pieces of land are approximately one acre. The proposed vacation and land swap will create a consolidated site for a planned residential development and will provide a more suitable location for future civic facilities . At the present time however , there is no proposal for any addition to the Civic Center complex. The Huntington Beach Company is proposing a walled and secured medium density residential development on their portion of the property. • A - It-Rip1 A-FM•23A • 3. 0 CONFORMANCE ANALYSIS: The proposed residential development will require a zone change from • R1-0-CD to R2-0-CD-PD in order to bring the zoning into conformance with the general plan designation of Medium Density. The proposed medium density development will provide a transitional land use between the five story Civic Center and the single family residential neighborhood to the south. Pine Street is currently used primarily by Civic Center employees and visitors for access to City Hall parking lots and to accommodate overflow parking. Seventeenth Street is striped to provide 84 parking spaces which are more frequently used when civic center lots are full . There is presently a parking deficiency in the Civic Center (not including Seventeenth Street ) parking lots of about 25 percent during peak hours . The proposed land trade and development project call for the retention of most of the parking area on Seventeenth Street and a new access drive connecting to Lake Street . This plan would result in the elimination of a total of approximately 15 parking spaces. The land consolidate. ; for City use at the southeast corner of City Hall , however, could be used to provide additional parking in the future. The vacation of Seventeenth Street will require relocating the existing bike path which gets heavy use during the school year by Huntington Beach Union High School Students . A bike lane already exists on Lake Street and a new bike lane will need to be striped • along Utica Street . The new route will be slightly longer than the existing diagonal route along 17th Street. The proposal to vacate the streets and alleys in the project area will facilitate better development of the property while conforming to the following policies set forth in the General Plan: 1 Encourage rational use of land and other natural resources (Land Use ) . 2 . Promote the provision of adequate community facilities within the City of Huntington Beach (Community Facilities ) . 3 . Site new City buildings and facilities in areas where existing and planned land uses are compatible with the facility that is being proposed (Community Facilities) . 4. Locate residential uses in proximity to commercial and industrial areas and transportation routes to provide convenient access to employment centers (Housing) . Attachment : 1 . Area Map JWP: tl • Staff Report 8/19/86 -2- (5883d ) \J , - -I I, I 1'- - I L_J . I l �S+�x�•'f-xIGQ'H CLAY R. e n --Ho AY C2-0 - p• :� tnesR. -,1 cxat• )� nr a`.! 3'` R3 R2 R3 czE R2-0-PD A R4 R2 • o�4 o .: r, •°'..�. F l:, _..V....:.i'✓'.N1g¢ a ;:. R2-0 �x0 R2 w� TR3 C2-0-CD Rxa-vd n..t �ti.C �_.:_ ::r RI RI 3 c�nxt Awo ( Ot xo I-,° CZ-0 j;.,�..': 6.N'..;t. ti�.:....,i : uw.aR R2 k h! R2-0 PD ¢• R2-0 a RI RI '�~ m>.eo MI II rn - - 4 r ee. La u R 2 R 2 R2 CZ-0-CD �I R5-0-CD Rz-0-Po- Qio- I .{ 3" R2 C4f0-I i._ ,ORRTDVIN r•,r,.•. _ .,� i x •L J A, R2 D-CD 9 AVE `E ca 1 R2.0 2 0 CF-C. CF-E-CD C7:::L 7^:R) xao � h R2-0-CD � /�!7pyI1I IM:I'�T:NCiiJ�:8',:i::" .!1J�::'I :ifi-:;N:hi`::'..1 t ICYIT4 RA R2 C2 FCF-E-CD° a I o " _CD_o R2-0 R2 R2 AY CA CF-E o° 1 -CD-0 JENIC! E Q�. ¢ D-0 o i w s.•P rxox .� -CD-0 UTICA CD 01 O R2-0 R2 0 ' Ma �-CD-0 ov a � • �, CF-R RI RI RI RI RI R2 -0 OMUNTO 0 0 I o 0 00 -CD-0] p -0 -0 -0 -0 rc ¢ N N ' -CD-0 Y I Rho A„lAIfI[al R2 �J SPRINGFIELD Q -0 O AL T•MAR OR •'TAI, O, 1 I N ell. O O -o7-o -o -o -o a N N n z RI RI RI RI RI R2 -0 ROCNESTER s A a L' a N 0 w xxxT ' 40 � .21Da Ho Ho H RS mRIO � RI-O0 3 0 R3-0 R3-0 R2 RI ADAIIS AVE GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE 86 -810 HUNTINGTON REACH HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION • 0 GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE 86-8 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1 . The proposed street and alley vacation will create traffic and safety problems for the adjacent single family residential neighborhood. 2. The number of daily vehicle trips generated by the proposed development after street vacations will cause undue traffic problems for the adjacent neighborhood. 3. The proposed R2 development is not compatible with the existing R1 neighborhood. 4. The proposed street and alley vacation is inconsistent with the goals and objectives of the General Plan. PP:kla ( 5967d) t 2�A * HUNTINGTON BEACH _ DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1 We the undersigned residents of Huntington Beach urge)l�t-ie-�`; � planning commission to deny zone change no. 82-15 and r ta e existing R1-0 and R1-0-CD zoning on the property. P• (l. So�9� Huntington Beach,CA 92648 NAME ADDRESS ZP3 0 r 2. 117 4 . 5. 6. 7 . 8 . 9. 10. 4 p 12. 13 . ;Ins r 1� ��� \ n C:� r- 14. ' A Y - 15 C'- 16. �1 � c ) /� �Jl rtic S� / 19 17. 18. 23. . ) �¢,� _ 24. 21. � 1 • • HUNTINGTON BEACH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES We the undersigned residents of Huntington Beach urge A�e 3,810185 planning commission to deny zone change no. 82-15 and retain the existing RI-0 and Rl-O-CD zoning on the property. P. 0, BOX 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 NAME ADDRESS 1. "b� F-i&'- % 72- Z 3 . 4. 5. d)l- 7. r 10. 11. �-7 13 15 16. 17. 18 . K(C 19. 20, Z4ti 7�7 121. 2 2 23 . 25. hare. • • HUNTINGTON BEACH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES I We the undersigned residents of Huntington Beach urge k%r planning commission to deny zone change no. 82-15 and the I�. o9 1�0 existing R1-0 and Rl-O-CD zoning on the property. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 NAME / ADDRESS / 1. 2 . C ; - G, dZ ZZ 4 . 5. /02 6 6. \ 8. r/, 9. ti ��✓, — 1i s b 10. 13 .� v 5. 16. 19 . ivy %( � _ 0�71 CArrA4z4 T /I •. 22 . 23 . -�/� �� (11,2 l/� Jz 24 . /-n" . 25. 1//oG� f • • HUNTINGTON BEACH DEVELOP-MiENT S`RVICES We the undersigned residents of Huntington Beach urge AU IGI i0,65 planning commission to deny zone change no. 82-15 and r t ' th • e � �. Box1 existing R1-O and R1-0-CD zoning on the property. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 NAME ADDRESS 2 . 3 . e� �� 7"7- 4 . 5. 17a k 6. Iry L 7. �,�� w �,"� �, (gyp cav-e 8. �� .� 2 9� �� ���� S7 1 f )k . 12 14Z7M— Z 15 � 16. zl_``� 17 1 RZ2 2�j 19 . Ag 21. Z( 23 . � �24 . / ZZg 25. HUNTINGTON BEACH DEVELO-f:SENT SERVICES We the undersigned residents of Huntington Beach urgennt i � n planning commission to deny zone change no. 82-15 and ainith� existing Rl-O and R1-0-CD zoning on the property. P. 0. BoX 190 .NAME ADDRESS Huntington Beach, CA 9264,3 2 . :� - �&�' 4 . � 2 / 5 . 6. 1 - . 8. -� < 9. t/ 10. 11. . 12 . 13 . �3 S7- 14. 15. 16. - . f 17. /L�t,� e,� l 2 )- 9 c e. SV , 18 . 19 . 2 0 1Lk 21. 22 . ; f , , ^ s 731 IL . 2 3 .1 ,f 24 . 6A-KI ST- 1 2 5. h4 �' 1206 LCA e t- • • ! H NTINGTON BEACH DEVELOPiv,ENT SLRVICES • I We the undersigned residents of Huntington Beach urg%jih�er)' !01 planning commission to deny zone change no. 82-15 and .etain the P. Box 190 existing R1-O and Rl-O-CD zoning on the propertYqUntington Beach, CA 9264j NAME ADDRESS 1. If 46 2 . 3 . 1-Zi" ���C /5 �t � 4 . 6. �e � ° Io2 �- 1 � 7 . 8. 9 10. L-214 � Q ZI 13 . 15. V` �02� . A 16. (FZ 0 17 . 1L `� 18. 19 . 9 20. 21. 22 . 23 . 24. 25. • I;J?" INCTC�1 BEACH DEVELO?E;IEf4T SERVICES 0 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING U L: 1 ? I;:'v5 ZONE CHANGE NO. 82-15 P. 0. Box 190(R1-O-CD TO R2-0-CD-PD) w Huntington Beach, CA 9264 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach Planning Commission will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Tuesday, August 19, 1986, 7 : 00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No. 82-15 APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach LOCATION: North of Utica Avenue south of Yorktown Avenue between 17th Street and Lake Street. REQUEST: Reconsideration of a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres from R1-O (Single Family Residential-Oil Suffix) and Rl-O-CD (Single Family Residential-Oil Suffix-Civic District) to R2-0-CD-PD (Medium Density Residential-Oil Suffix-Civic District - Planned Development Suffix) . This item was continued to a date uncertain on December 6, 1982 . COMMENTS s=,/� Signed i UiWINGTON l BEACH • • DEVEI.OEi,;EP.J ScRVICES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AUG 1�} 1985 P. O. Box 190 ZONE CHANGE NO. 82-15 Huntington Beach, CA 92643 (R1-O-CD TO R2-0-CD-PD) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach Planning Commission will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Tuesday, August 19, 1986, 7: 00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No. 82-15 APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach LOCATION: North of Utica Avenue south of Yorktown Avenue between 17th Street and Lake Street. REQUEST: Reconsideration of a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres from R1-O (Single Family Residential-Oil Suffix) and R1-0-CD (Single Family Residential-Oil Suffix-Civic District) to R2-0-CD-PD (Medium Density Residential-Oil Suffix-Civic District - Planned Development Suffix) . This item was continued to a date uncertain on December 6, 1982 . COMMENTS: Signed v. , ( ���f✓ • • HUNTINGTON BEACH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AUG 18 1986 ZONE CHANGE NO. 8 2-15 P• 0. BOX 190 (Rl—O—CD TO R2-0—CD—PD) Huntington Beach, CA 9264a NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach Planning Commission will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Tuesday, August 19, 1986, 7:00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No. 82-15 APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach LOCATION: North of Utica Avenue south of Yorktown Avenue between 17th Street and Lake Street. REQUEST: Reconsideration of a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres from Rl-0 (Single Family Residential-Oil Suffix) and R1-O-CD (Single Family Residential-oil Suffix-Civic District) to R2-0-CD-PD (Medium Density Residential-oil Suffix-Civic District - Planned Development Suffix) . This item was continued to a date uncertain on December 6, 1982. COMMENTS: t Signed • • INGTOi\i BEACH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AUG, j. io 6 ZONE CHANGE NO. 8 2-15 R O. BoX 190 (R1-0-CD TO R2-0-CD-PD) Huntington Beach, CA 92.64,; NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach Planning Commission will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Tuesday, August 19, 1986, 7: 00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No. 82-15 APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach LOCATION: North of Utica Avenue south of Yorktown Avenue between 17th Street and Lake Street. REQUEST: Reconsideration of a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres from R1-0 (Single Family Residential-Oil Suffix) and R1-O-CD (Single Family Residential-Oil Suffix-Civic District) to R2-0-CD-PD (Medium Density Residential-Oil Suffix-Civic District - Planned Development Suffix) . This item was continued to a date uncertain on December 6, 1982 . COMMENTS• ` ` �6tiv� ✓� r 1, Vt (/M J � O signed;--) • • (;;;;� INGTOk*\1 BEACH DEVEL0011iENT SERVICES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AU G 13 1 01P ZONE CHANGE NO. 82-15 P. 0. Box 190 (R1-O-CD TO R2-0-CD-PD) Huntington Beach, CA 9264ci NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach Planning Commission will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Tuesday, August 19, 1986, 7: 00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No. 82-15 APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach LOCATION: North of Utica Avenue south of Yorktown Avenue between 17th Street and Lake Street. REQUEST: Reconsideration of a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres from RI-O (Single Family Residential-Oil Suffix) and R1-0-CD (Single Family Residential-Oil Suffix-Civic District) to R2-0-CD-PD (Medium Density Residential-Oil Suffix-Civic District - Planned Development Suffix) . This item was continued to a date uncertain on December 6, 1982 . COMMENTS• �JI1 t_ r7ll�Q��� 1!� - Signed • • liviv T INCITOPl BEACH DEVELOPiMENT SERVICES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AUC 1_ I01",6 ZONE CHANGE NO. 8 2-15 P. 0. Box 190 (R1-O-CD TO R2-0-CD-PD) Huntington Beach, CA 9264,3 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach Planning Commission will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Tuesday, August 19, 1986, 7: 00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No. 82-15 APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach LOCATION: North of Utica Avenue south of Yorktown Avenue between 17th Street and Lake Street. REQUEST: Reconsideration of a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres from R1-0 (Single Family Residential-Oil Suffix) and R1-0-CD (Single Family Residential-Oil Suffix-Civic District) to R2-0-CD-PD (Medium Density Residential-Oil Suffix-Civic District - Planned Development Suffix) . This item was continued to a date uncertain on December 6, 1982 . COMMENTS: (�� ( 10 /9�t Signed i • IiiJi4TINGT0i J BEACH DEVELOPMiENT SERVICES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AUG l_3 1985 ZONE CHANGE NO. 8 2-15 P. 0. Box 190 (Rl-O-CD TO R2-0-CD-PD) Huntington Beach, CA 9264d NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach Planning Commission will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Tuesday, August 19, 1986, 7: 00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No. 82-15 APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach LOCATION: North of Utica Avenue south of Yorktown Avenue between 17th Street and Lake Street. REQUEST: Reconsideration of a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres from R1-0 (Single Family Residential-Oil Suffix) and R1-O-CD (Single Family Residential-Oil Suffix-Civic District) to R2-0-CD-PD (Medium Density Residential-Oil Suffix-Civic District - Planned Development Suffix) . This item was continued to a date uncertain on December 6, 1982 . 1 i COMMENTS• S eqned • HU NTINGTON BEACH DEVELOP?,!ENT SERVICES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AUG 18 1985 Z ONE CHANGE NO. 8 2-15 P. O. BoX 190 (Rl-O-CD TO R2-0-CD-PD) Huntington Beach, CA 92540 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach Planning Commission will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Tuesday, August 19, 1986, 7: 00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No. 82-15 APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach LOCATION: North of Utica Avenue south of Yorktown Avenue between 17th Street and Lake Street. REQUEST: Reconsideration of a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres from R1-O (Single Family Residential-Oil Suffix) and R1-O-CD (Single Family Residential-Oil Suffix-Civic District) to R2-0-CD-PD (Medium Density Residential-Oil Suffix-Civic District - Planned Development Suffix) . This item was continued to a date uncertain on December 6, 1982 . COMMENTS:_TL Ca4,(� a, -X_t_A ;upcLu wDAI-AA tAA-,k �o Wu J Signed I • KUP4TINGTOil BEACH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AUG 1 I-9,85 ZONE CHANGE NO. 82-15 P. 0. BOX 190 (R1-0-CD TO R2-0-CD-PD) Huntington Beach, CA 9264d NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach Planning Commission will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Tuesday, August 19, 1986, 7: 00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No. 82-15 APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach LOCATION: North of Utica Avenue south of Yorktown Avenue between 17th Street and Lake Street. REQUEST: Reconsideration of a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres from Rl-O (Single Family Residential-Oil Suffix) and R1-O-CD (Single Family Residential-Oil Suffix-Civic District) to R2-0-CD-PD (Medium Density Residential-Oil Suffix-Civic District - Planned Development Suffix) . This item was continued to a date uncertain on December 6, 1982 . COMMENTS• C Q ✓t y e� ,. - c-, c i Signed HUNTINGTON BEACH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING G (- i 1 0 ZONE CHANGE NO. 8 2-15 P. 0. Box 190 (Rl-O-CD TO R2-0-CD-PD) Huntington Beach, CA 9264d NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach Planning Commission will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Tuesday, August 19, 1986, 7:00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No. 82-15 APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach LOCATION: North of Utica Avenue south of Yorktown Avenue between 17th Street and Lake Street. REQUEST: Reconsideration of a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres from R1-0 (Single Family Residential-oil Suffix) and R1-O-CD (Single Family Residential-oil Suffix-Civic District) to R2-0-CD-PD (Medium Density Residential-Oil Suffix-Civic District - Planned Development Suffix) . This item was continued to a date uncertain on December 6, 1982 . c COMMENTS: 1410 Cs igned 4� 'k-1UNTINGTON BEACH DE`!EI.OP LENT SERA/ICES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING � ZONE CHANGE NO. 82-15 AJG 'S' 1985 (Rl-O-CD TO R2-0-CD-PD) P. 0. BOX 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach Planning Commission will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Tuesday, August 19, 1986, 7: 00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No. 82-15 APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach LOCATION: North of Utica Avenue south of Yorktown Avenue between 17th Street and Lake Street. REQUEST: Reconsideration of a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres from Rl-0 (Single Family Residential-Oil Suffix) and R1-O-CD (Single Family Residential-Oil Suffix-Civic District) to R2-0-CD-PD (Medium Density Residential-Oil Suffix-Civic District - Planned Development Suffix) . This item was continued to a date uncertain on December 6, 1982 . COMMENTS• I y �`�� - Signed K'UNTINGTOiN! BEACH DEVEL0F ,1Er:T SERVICES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AUC J_0 IST6 ZONE CHANGE NO. 82-15 (R1-O-CD TO R2-0-CD-PD) P. 0. pox 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92540 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach Planning Commission will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Tuesday, August 19, 1986, 7 : 00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No. 82-15 APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach LOCATION: North of Utica Avenue south of Yorktown Avenue between 17th Street and Lake Street. REQUEST: Reconsideration of a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres from Rl-O (Single Family Residential-Oil Suffix) and R1-O-CD (Single Family Residential-Oil Suffix-Civic District) to R2-0-CD-PD (Medium Density Residential-Oil Suffix-Civic District - Planned Development Suffix) . This item was continued to a date uncertain on December 6, 1982 . COMMENTS• Z+Y f _ �- c``C��LG� c .4 AL h�- 42 Sig We the undersigned residents of Huntington Beach urge the planning commission to deny zone change no. 82-15 and retain the existing R1-O and R1-O-CD zoning on the property. NAME ADDRESS 1. 4. 5. 9. 10. Z 23i S7- 11. ':�ev 7 12 . 13 . 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19 . 20. 21. 22 . 23 . 24 . 25. We the undersigned residents of Huntington Beach urge the planning commission to deny zone change no. 82-15 and retain the existing Rl-O and Rl-O-CD zoning on the property. NAME ADDRESS 1. go. uj)'� /. —) 6 2 . A41um C�O 3 . 4 . 5. � 1 z12Z ! " c, 6.V 7 8 9 Dt1 2 GiL Z Cv: Z-� U / 11. d 4ilg�hq `C, 12. 13 14 15 16. L 1731 44K6-S 17 . Z-7 D P n,e 18 . 11/D , 19 20. OC 92 y� 21 22 . 23 . a6l,L 24 . 25. We the undersigned residents of Huntington Beach urge the planning commission to deny zone change no. 82-15 and retain the existing R1-0 and R1-O-CD zoning on the property. NAME ADDRESS 1. O 2 . 'Fell 3 . 5. —. o 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12 . 13 . 14. I 15. 16. 17. 18 . 19 . 20. 21. 22 . 23 . 24 . 25. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CHANGE NO. 82-15 (R1-O-CD TO R2-0-CD-PD) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach Planning Commission will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Tuesday, August 19, 1986, 7 : 00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No. 82-15 APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach LOCATION: North of Utica Avenue south of Yorktown Avenue between 17th Street and Lake Street. REQUEST: Reconsideration of a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres from R1-0 (Single Family Residential-Oil Suffix) and R1-O-CD (Single Family Residential-Oil Suffix-Civic District) to R2-0-CD-PD (Medium Density Residential-Oil Suffix-Civic District - Planned Development Suffix) . This item was continued to a date uncertain on December 6, 1982 . COMMENTS• Zth - I z44(,p A <P-0 R PA�2� M Q/ Z L 1 Signed � r C -S NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CHANGE NO. 82-15 (Rl-O-CD TO R2-0-CD-PD) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach Planning Commission will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Tuesday, August 19, 1986, 7: 00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No. 82-15 APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach LOCATION: North of Utica Avenue south of Yorktown Avenue between 17th Street and Lake Street. REQUEST: Reconsideration of a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres from R1-0 (Single Family Residential-Oil Suffix) and R1-0-CD (Single Family Residential-Oil Suffix-Civic District) to R2-0-CD-PD (Medium Density Residential-Oil Suffix-Civic District - Planned Development Suffix) . This item was continued to a date uncertain on December 6, 1982 . COMMENTS• I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT YOU DO NOT APPROVE THE ABOVE ZONING CHANGE. THE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS CREATED BY MULTIPLE DWELLING IN THE INVOLVED AREA WILL CREAT UNSOLVABLE PROBLEMS DURING THE SCHOOL YEAR, AND PARKING IN THE AREA WILL BE DJPOSSIBLE. MULTIPLE HOUSING UNITS IN THIS AREA ARE NOT THAT NEEDED, THE SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING ZONING (AS IT IS NOW) SEF24S ALL RIGHT - THAT IS WHY WE BOUGHT THIS PROPERTY, BECAUSE THE INVOLVED AREA WAS ZONED (R-1), THERE IS NO GOOD REASON TO CHANGE THAT ZONING NOW. THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. WANTS TO BUILD HUGE APARTMENTS THAT WILL FLOOD THE AREA WITH MORE PEOPLE AND THE PROBLEMS THAT GO ALONG V'fITH THEM.' E Signed M. 0. GTON 219 $EST UTICA HUNTINGTON BEACH Signed _ N M./RET.IiNGTON 219 WEST UTICA HUNTINGTON BEACH T. �.r f REQUE FOR CITY COUNCII ACTION Date July 21 , 1986 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator' '4 O Prepared by: James W. Palin, Director, Development Services Subject: ZONE CHANGE NO. 82-15/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. —40 I }l Consistent with Council Policy? W-Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception ON 10 Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions,Attachments: On December 6, 1982, the City Council voted to continue (with no date certain) an appeal to the above-referenced zone change which covers the nine acres of property immediately to the south of the Huntington Beach Civic Center. The request was by the City of Huntington Beach to change the zoning designations from R1-0 and R1-0-CD to R2-0-CD-PD. The request was denied by the Planning Commission on November 2, 1982. Staff recommends that the City Council reintroduce this item and direct staff to reanalyze the property and come back with a recommendation as part of a public hearing with renotification of adjacent property owners. ATTACHMENT: 1 . Area Map 2. City Council Minutes (December 6, 1982) 3. Request for City Council Action ( November 18, 1982) JWP :JA: kla (5611d) I PIO 4/84 G PLANNING ZONING DIM 2 0 qoo SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 2-6- II SCALE IN FEET ADOPTED MARCH 7 1960 NOTE: w .T • CITY OF 4L dNDED TO.AC IN FEET CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 706 AN ZONE .JOINING •r RONT OF. IS INTENDED TO Ca TCxD TO THE CENTER .NEx D[0 SOME 4SC QRO m. .NENRD -;i�f.K MO.NO D — .1.1 OF.Ai 6-m-m Id 113 1TT•12 Tz-16(U 1162 .Ie-m Iza nI 9-B-1z n-23 I,T5 LEGEND: 12-043 )J-22 109 SRNLC F.AIILT RESIDENCE OOTR,CT =4061 aR q-0d] 13-20 lore 0 hK-611M0�1°P° trA-)3 17-Sa ZWO R2 T. FAIOLT RESIDENCE DISTRICT HUNTINGTON BEACH 9.16.1 200306 a6e .-.-,] Ta m02 M CONNuxrtT F.OLITI[9IEDVC.TIONALI DISTRICT -6♦I ZQ a1e a-A-15 r-y m0] S-T-u 25) m0 a-2a-TS PPA13-x zW. Q OFT[E-PRD `ONAL DISTINCT 5-Zl bi 2AaA-19a6 ""Ol 205A ANETIDEO zcw CASE 0`5- 211 m, 6-)-,6 Teb, 206! RA RESIDENTIAL A6RtL1ATVRAL DISTRICT e-zo-,9 PPAT9-1 2391 2-a-62 !ai 9311 fit-" T6�I] i20 0 0 LIOxT INDUSTIRAL WTRICT ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA "RE �:; M' ,:_;� � � � �';� _„' ® ����,°„�uDI,TRIGT 1-3— a2.12 2595 6-2. 133 STa hWIG �e-0 21or xfiN.A1 GOM.FRCIAL ( 1-3-aJ ez-le 219, 1-6-N 3T9 q2e .-11-,e 6-22 t153 AIS LI=RT[D MlLTIN.E FANILT RESO[NCE DISTRCT 1-3-® aN9 259) q-5-61 ATJ q90 I-3-,T )6-11 21SJ 21A9 -]-6] SO3 IIS2 1e. 21]s © NEIOIBOITx00D COWETKW. l-21.66 S5 21 -4A)0.D,D.N3TEV 2111 21.10 6-h11 T1-1 2160 ® WLTIFLE ZMITFA -Ly RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT 2-1,�69 ea-52 NTO 68Di1 11.6 2.11 ® CDNNIINRY fAC61TIE3([IYICI DISTRICT 2-I169 N-SZ 1). II-IS-,6 PP.,6-e 2129 if Ta.CR le¢ q 662 6f25 '52, S}9T)-y-Fr-Y.N6-6B--EEByBy NNBINED'1 2TO `0--0110e 1 1 :9- -11 11).3. 2250 dL dT 0N ] -016-2 i)n 22261 --y I1N91 9 1 11 A OWLIFED CLASSR ®FECI N Pµ OF STQT AA/ R- 4-11 11 n - 42 72-161FI 160 eIS 2m -CD CIVK DISTRICT ----OLDTO.NSPEC.IC.LAII a.a J IGARFIELD I I I I - I I AVE.I L• 55-ae z I .-RA-O 8 CI f' 'm mR2' 5W' R2r-- - MI ';: MH - -- o R2 m O RA-0 ? w uNE aR JmJ e3oaA . R2 �`:R2 R 2 RQ-Oe '_ �wh:---:;�l MIAO R2 R2 C 41 R 2 o � i.R2 M I R2 OLCTOW1J R2 R toNtz-oI R 2 _ $ ! ♦ 2 8 g -``. PLAN OWRICT I-) Joo lz xml CLAY C2-0- ,... ..... _,,.,. .� - !mow _ 5.... -- "' � "�� a /*70cz-a:a r d i I R3o,� mo � R R2 f R2-0-PD o! o '•:'a R2-0 Rzo R2 $ R2 N .N ' -,'I ' I LINE TR 5950 s„r�' is• -.-Y....:.r�✓',K ¢ s R2-a-Pd ...t �: � RI 2Bo RI a I C2-0-CD F� C2-p ,>,.,;::.. 0,4 <.....:::;:. CLEITLAND NN ,0y1 r k, , .; }..; .ER R 2 „ • !n•,93A[ 7 R2J0 PD::t". R2-0 RI a R RI -qls z TCi-a[L9- rn]930 MI------ AV W E, R2 R2 R2 I pl R5-O-CD '2-O-Po-:: R2-D-CD . 1 L � ; 0 5 R2 3m It 1 ieA C2-0-CD �. o 3 C41D� �.' R2 I_ TORNTDwN lDrnlA•[ �. A C2 IN O1 00 .m R2 0-CD C4 x R2.0 2 :0E CF-C CF-E-CD Zm ray, Vie{p- -if,F ^il ICNITA 'RA R2 C 2 O 0 sCF-E-CD x o o o -co-o R2-0 R2 R2 D° a CF-E ; ��' F. CD-0 E CL 0 �3— I)L o Ir:o[ •E \O s -CD 0 Jso R4 •. -- I VE. HH _0 Ir CD 0 0 _0 R2-0 R2-0 �,. CD O •, CF-R RI RI RI RI RI R2 -CD-0 01.UNTO A« o 0 1 0 0 * CD-0 O i N N �� 0 -0 -0 -0 K ¢ N N V ¢ K RFD > H co-o p I .Na.NTEa. R2 CC SPRINGFrt LD O -011 . ALTANAR DR cIj D -0 -0 -0 -0/ I� K OfA. N N = RI RI RI RI RI R2 -0 ROCHESTER < A Rao Rj W RI-� V� 46'� 9�N _ W aaTa� aUgI AR . m �T� �cR RI_0 °sir z i Q 0 i 0 0 a 0 0 J R3-0 R13-0 0 ,R2 • 94 u I • ! D I�-;:R' �Rl - +RFO ADAMS I AVE 2 91 M I- c.FF I4NCvE AVID► 9 L- S � a W 6 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 3-6-II c CITY OF • HUNTINGTON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA USE OF PROPERTY MAP au U �.n s e GARFIELD AVEM E 1 I --------------- F a °E•V E - h tJ g 6 J N • Ilwwf L,P- •mil,$'• sE�iun:......... oll 0~ • � o � � s e • a C�, io u 41, Page #3 - Council Minu�,cs - 12/6/82 0 PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL TO THE PC DENIAL OF -f5 *- HEARING CONTINUED��ZC .82 PEN UNTIL FPPC/AG RULING The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing to consider an appeal filed by Councilman Pattinson to the denial of a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres of property located north of Utica Avenue, between 17th and Lake Streets from R1-0 (Low Density Residential combined with oil production) and R1-0-CD (Low Density Residential combined with oil production within Civic District) to R2-0-PD-CD (Medium Density Residential District combined with oil production, Planned Development Suffix and within Civic District). He stated that Negative Declaration No. 82-40 would be considered in conjunction with Zone Case No. 82-15. The City Clerk announced that all legal requirements for notification, publica- tion and posting had been met, and that she had received a communication from Mrs. R. Letson opposed to said appeal and that additional communications and informal petition received by the Planning Commission were on file in the City Clerk's Office. A motion was made by MacAllister, seconded by Kelly, to continue consideration of an appeal to the Planning Commission's denial of Zone Case 82-15 until Councilman Pattinson received a ruling from the Fair Political Practices Com- mission and the Attorney General 's Office regarding a possible conflict of interest and directed that renotification be given at that time. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: MacAllister, Mandic, Finley, Bailey, Kelly NOES: None NOT VOTING: Pattinson ABSENT: Thomas (out of the room) RECESS - RECONVE E The Mayor called a ecess of Council at 9:13 P.M. The meeting was reconvened at 9:21 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL PC GENIAL OF CUP 82-26 - P VERRULED - CUP APPROVED The Mayor announced that th was the day and ho set for a public hearing to consider an appeal filed by A 0 Petroleum Co ny, on behalf of Atlantic Rich- field Company, to the denial o onditional se Permit No. 82-26, a request to permit the conversion of an exist' g ser ' e station into a convenience market combined with gasoline sales within h C4 (Highway Commercial District) located at the southwest corner of enwest Street and Heil Avenue (16501 i Goldenwest Street). The City Clerk announced tha all legal req 'rements for notification, publica- tion and posting had been t, and that she h received no communications or written protests to a matter. The Mayor declared a hearing open. The following ople spoke in favor of the convenience arket: Sam Blick, Monir Malko hillip Johnson, George Scott, Christopher ahage and William Malko. i i i REQUESO . .)R CITY COUNCI111. A'-TION Date ember 18 , 198 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator o Prepared by: James W. Palin, Director, Development Services Subject: APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION' S DENIAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. 82-15 Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Transmitted for your consideration is an appeal to the Planning Commis- sion' s denial of Zone Change No. 82-15, a request to change the zoning on property located north of Utica Avenue, between 17th Street and Lake Street from R1-O and R1-O-CD to R2-0-PD-CD, Medium Density Resi- dential District combined with oil production, within the Civic Dis- trict and having a planned development suffix. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council uphold the Commission' s denial of Zone Change No. 82-15. The Planning staff reconuezded to the Planning Cornnission approval of a change of zone on the subject property from R1-O and R1-O-CD to R2-0-CD-PD. ANALYSIS : Appellant: Councilman Pattinson • Applicant: Initiated by the Department of Development Services Location: Subject property is located north of Utica Avenue between 17th and Lake Streets. Request: To permit a change of zone on the subject property from Rl-0, Low Density Residential District combined with oil production and R1-O-CD, Low Density Residential combined with oil production, Civic District to R2-0- CD-PD, Medium Density Residential District combined with oil production, Civic District and having a planned development suffix. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION OF NOVEMBER 2 , 1982 : ON MOTION BY PORTER AND SECOND BY WINCHELL ZONE CHANGE NO. 82-15 WAS DENIED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: P10 4/81 ZC' 82-15 • November 18 , 1982 Page 2 AYES: Livengood, Winchell, Paone, Porter, Schumacher, Mirjahangir NOES : Higgins , ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None DISCUSSION: Zone Change No. 8.2-15 is a request initiated by the Department of De- velopment Services to change the zoning on property located north of Utica Avenue between 17th and Lake Streets from Rl-O-CD and Rl-O to R2-0-CD-PD, Medium Density Residential combined with oil production, Civic District and having a planned development suffix. This zone change was initiated by the Department of Development Services as part of an agreement between the City and the Huntington Beach Company whereby a . 84 acre parcel of land owned by the Huntington Beach Company, located near the northeast corner of Main Street and Utica Avenue would be exchanged for a parcel of land located south of Yorktown Avenue ap- proximately 140 feet west of Lake Street to accommodate future develop- ment of a community center located on the northeast corner of Utica Avenue and Main Street. In addition to this exchange, the Huntington Beach Company has requested that Pine Street between 17th and Utica and a portion of 17th Street be vacated. Zone Change No. 82-15 is also being requested by the Department of Development Services to bring the subject property into conformance with the current General Plan designation. The current zoning on the subject property is Rl-O and Rl-O-CD, while the General Plan designation is currently medium density residential. Approval of Zone Change No. 82-15 would bring the zoning designation into conformance with the General Plan. In reviewing Zone Change No. 82-15, the Commission had a number of concerns regarding a change of zone on the subject property to R2-0- CD-PD. These concerns included the traffic study submitted by the Public Works Department, the location of the senior center in relation to the high school located across Main Street to the west, the proposed increase in density and the compatibility of a future condominium pro- ject with surrounding single family residential development. The Commission also was concerned about placing "planned development suf- fix" on the subject property and felt that this would compound an existing parking problem within the area. It was noted by the Com- mission that the compatibility of a future senior center with the high school was in question. The Commission was also concerned with the compatibility of the existing single family dwellings with a pos- sible future condominium development on the subject site, and felt that the additional traffic generated by this development would have a negative effect on the surrounding residential properties. The Commission also noted that the traffic study prepared by the Public Works Department was inadequate and that additional questions regard- ing traffic within the area remain unanswered. Based on these argu- ments, the Commission denied Zone Change No. 82-15 with the following findings: . ZC- 82-15 • N-Ovember 13 , 1982 Page 3 FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1. .-The proposed -density is not compatible with surrounding residential area. 2. The proposed "PD"- suffix would only compound an existing parking problem in the area. Staff analysis of Zone Change No. 82-15 indicates that the addition of the "planned development" suffix to the subject property would maximize development control on future projects proposed for this property. The addition of the "planned development" suffix to the subject property would require all proposed projects to conform to the development standards contained within the "Planned Residential De- velopment" standards (Article 936 , HBOC) which include density stan- dards, vehicle access requirements, open space, circulation, setbacks and landscaping requirements. The "Planned Development" standards would also require the developer to submit, for review by the Planning Commission, a conditional use permit application and tentative tract map. This process includes the requirement that a public hearing be held at which time residents within the community may voice their opinions regarding the proposed development. The staff also indicated to the Planning Commission on November 2 , 1982, that the addition of the "planned development" suffix would allow the City better control over points of access to the future development, limiting circulation from the project to the south on to Park and Pine Streets. Much of the traffic from the future Planned Residential De- velopment could be directed toward Lake Street or Yorktown Avenue with- out impacting the existing single family dwellings located to the south of the subject property. Based on these arguments, the Planning staff recommended approval of Zone Change No. 82-15 , a change of zone from R1-O and R1-O-CD to R2-0-CD-PD. The Department of Development Services received approximately 50 letters of opposition to Zone Change No. 82-15. Copies of these letters are on file with the City Clerk. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Development Services posted draft Negative Declaration No. 82-40 for 10 days , and no comments either verbal or written were received. The staff in its initial study of the project has recom- mended that a negative declaration be issued for Zone Change No. 82-15 . Prior to any action on Zone Change No. 82-15 , it is necessary for the City Council to act on Negative Declaration No. 82-40. ON MOTION BY PORTER AND SECOND BY HIGGINS, NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 82-40 WAS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON NOVEMBER 2 , 1982, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: ZC• 82-15 • • 'November 18, 1982 Page 4 AYES: Higgins, Livengood, Winchell, Paone, Porter, Mirjahangir NOES : Schumacher ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The City Council may consider approving Zone Change No. 82-15 changing the zoning on the subject property from R1-O and R1-O-CD to R2-0-CD-PD. FUNDING SOURCE: Not applicable. SUPPORTING INFORMATION: 1 . Letter from appellant 2 . Area Map 3 . Staff Report dated November 2, 1982 4. Negative Declaration No. 82-40 5. Ordinance JWP:SMS:jlm �• _ E REQUEo-f FOR CITY COUNQLI ACTION Date July 21 , 1986 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrators Prepared by: James W. Palin, Director, Development Services Subject: GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE NO. 82-8 (APPEAL) �lc�e Consistent with Council Policy? tA Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: General Plan Conformance No. 82-8 considers a proposal by the ` Department of Public Works to vacate Pine Street between Seventeenth Street and Utica Avenue, vacate portions of Seventeenth Street from Utica Avenue to Yorktown Avenue, and declare a ."31± acre parcel near the intersection of Seventeenth Street and Yorktown Avenue as surplus to the needs of the City. On November 2, 1982, after public testimony on the proposal, the Planning Commission made a finding of non-conformance with the City' s General Plan. Although citing no specific General Plan policies, the Planning Commission made a finding of non-conformance based on inadequate information from staff conerning the purpose and - intent of the proposal as required in California Government Code Section 65402(a) . On November 5, 1982, an appeal to the City Council was filed with the City Clerk concerning the Planning Commission' s action. On December 6, 1982, the City Council continued General Plan Conformance until Councilman Pattinson could obtain a ruling from the Fair Political Practices Commission and the Attorney General ' s office regarding a possible conflict of interest. Since Councilman r Pattinson is no longer on the City Council that concern is now a moot point. The General Plan Conformance can be considered without concern about conflict of interest. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning staff recommends that the City Council take action on General Plan Conformance No. 82-8 which was continued -,from_-December 6•, 1982, ".as recommended by staff in the attached .Request for Council Action dated November 22, 1982. ATTACHMENTS: 1 . City council minutes dated December 6, 1982 2. Request for Council Action dated November 22, 1982 i JWP:HS: kla I (5650d ) PIO 4/84 �r • 0 MINUTES Council Chamber, Civic Center Huntington Beach, California Mond ay, December 6, 1982 A tape recording of this meeting is on file in the City Clerk' s Office Mayor Mandic called the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach to order at 7:30 P.M. CEREMONY - INVOCATION The Flag Ceremony was conducted by Girl Scout Troop #62, Karla Green, Leader. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Vicky Flowers. The Invocation was given by Karrin Green. ROLL CALL Present: Pattinson, Thomas , MacAllister, hlandic, Finley, Bailey, Kelly Absent: None PROCLAMATION - DECEMBER 12, 1982 - "CAROLING DAY IN HUNTINGTON BEACH" Mayor Mandic presented a proclamation designating December 12, 1982 as "Caroling Day in Huntington Beach" to Edward Thomas, Chairman of the Board of West Orange County YMCA. PRESENTATION - "VOLUNTEER OF THE MONTH" - FRAN ANDRADE .Mayor Mandic presented a plaque to Fran Andrade "Volunteer of the Month for the Month of November" for her work on the Human Resources Board and in the Oak View area. COMMENDATION - DOUG ELSON - COMMUNITY CLINIC Mayor Mandic presented a plaque to Doug Elson, former Executive Director, for his outstanding efforts on behalf of the public at the Huntington Beach Community Clinic. Mr. Elson left the clinic on November 30, 1982. PRESENTATION - $10,000 - FROM AMINOIL FOR OAK VIEW CENTER Mayor Mandic accepted a check for $10,000 from William Donnelly representing Aminoil USA, Inc. for the Oak View Center. PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL TO PC DENIAL OF GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE 82-8 - COffTINUED UNTIL FPPC/AG RULING - HEARING CLOSED , The Mayor announced that this was the day and ho u' set for a public hearing to consider an appeal filed by Councilman Pattinson of the action taken by the Planning Commission on November 2, 1982 regarding General Plan Conformance No. 82-8. The following specific action was appealed: a finding of noncon- I �r Page 7-412 - Council Minutes - 12/6/82 P, formance with the General Plan regarding the vacation of Pine Street between P� Seventeenth Street and Utica Avenue, to Yorktown Avenue, and the declaration of 0` a .31— acre parcel near the intersection of Seventeenth Street and Yorktown Avenue as surplus. Tr tc The City Clerk announced that all legal requirements for publication and posting tc had been met, and that she had received communications from Mrs. R. Letson U, and M. 0. Remington in opposition to said appeal , as well as an informal cc petition from the Lake Park Neighborhood listing approximately 181 signatures w, in opposition. RE a The Director of Development Services presented a staff report regarding the W matter. Tr The Mayor declared the hearing open. t, Mr Bob Bolen spoke in opposition to the appeal . it Ci Craig Gireth spoke in opposition to the appeal citing impact on the surround- ing neighborhood, * A c= Ed Ogden spoke in opposition to the appeal citing parking problems in the area. C- R; Dave Eadie representing the Huntington Beach Company spoke in favor of the it appeal , he stated there was no project planned for the site at this time. John Peterson spoke in opposition to the appeal and cited possible problems A'' if a community center were located in the area. There being no one present to speak further on the matter and there being no A further protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor. R.. Councilman Thomas left the room. T.I a- Discussion was held regarding the appeal . Following a discussion with the City Attorney, Councilman Pattinson requested the matter be continued until he could obtain a ruling from the Fair Political T' Practices Commission and the Attorney General 's Office regarding a possible c: conflict of interest. P` A motion was made by Bailey, seconded by MacAllister, to continue a decision c; regarding the appeal until Councilman Pattinson could receive a ruling from 1: the Fair Political Practices Commission and the Attorney General 's Office Gc regarding a possible conflict of interest, and directed that renotification be given at that time. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: T t AYES: MacAllister, Mandic, Finley, Bailey, Kelly NOES: None NOT VOTING: Pattinson Tr ABSENT: Thomas (out of the room) T; M: M� REQUES"OR CITY COUNCIL�'l�CTION Date November 22, 1982 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator Prepared by: James W. Palin, Director of Development Services U' Subject: GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE NO. 82-8 (APPEAL) Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: General Plan Conformance No. 82-8 considers a proposal by the Department of Public Works to vacate Pine Street between Seventeenth Street and Utica Avenue, vacate portions of Seventeenth Street from Utica Avenue to Yorktown Avenue, and declare a .31± acre parcel near the intersection of Seventeenth Street and Yorktown Avenue as surplus to the needs of the City. On November 2, 1982, after public testimony on the proposal , the Planning Commission made a finding of non-conformance with the City' s General Plan. Although citing no specific General Plan policies, the Planning Commission made a finding of non-conformance based on inadequate information from staff concerning the purpose and intent of the proposal as required in California Government Code Section 65402 (a) . On November 5 , 1982 an appeal to the City Council was filed with the City Clerk concerning the Planning Commission' s action. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning staff recommends __that the City Council find General Plan Conformance No. 82-8 to be in conformance with the General Plan. Staff feels the Department of Public Works ' proposal conforms to the most applicable policies set forth in the General Plan: A. Promote the rational use of land and other natural resources (Land Use) . B. Capitalize on the outdoor and environmental potential of the City by developing community centers that combine high schools, community parks, recreational centers, branch libraries, and other uses in one area (Land Use) . C. Insure a full range of community facilities that provide for the general public ' s health, safety, and welfare by providing meeting centers for civic and other groups (Land Use) . PIO 4/81 ' CGP 82-8 (Appeal) November 22, 1982 Page 2 D. Site new City buildings and facilities in the areas where existing and planned land uses are compatible with the facility that is being proposed . (Community Facilities) . E. . Promote the provision of adequate community facilities within the City of Huntington Beach (Community Facilities) . F. Develop a system of arterial streets and highways that ensures the safe and efficient movement of people and goods (Circulation) . G. Provide a transportation system that is consistent with efforts to minimize adverse environmental and aesthetic effects (Circulation) . ANALYSIS: Section 65402 (a) of the California Governmental Code states that no real property shall be acquired or disposed of until the location, pur- pose, and extent of such acquisition or disposition has been submitted to and reported upon by the planning agency as to conformity with the General Plan. As summarized in the attached staff reports, General Plan Conformance No. 82-8 would accommodate the needs of both the City and the Huntington Beach Company. The proposal would allow for consolidation of parcels currently owned by the Huntington Beach Company into a more buildable site. In exchange, the City would be conveyed a . 84± acre parcel near the northeast corner of Main Street and Utica Avenue for future devel- opment of a community center. By vacating a portion of Seventeenth Street adjacent to the parcel, the City would acquire a total buildable site of approximately 2. 4± acres comprised of the . 84± acre parcel acquired from the Huntington Beach Company and extending across Seven- teenth Street onto Civic Center property ( . 61± acre of Seventeenth Street and . 93± acre of Civic Center property) . The street vacations and ex- change of property were discussed and informally agreed to in concept by the City Council on June 28, 1982. The City has additionally initiated a zone change for the area north of Utica Avenue between Seventeenth Street and Lake Street to allow for a medium density planned residential development, in accordance with with the June 28 informal understanding between the parties . The street vacations and property exchange would create a more buildable site for such a development. A revised traffic analysis of potential traffic volumes anticipated from residential development on the subject prop- erty, prepared by the Department of Public Works, is included as an attachment. The revised traffic analysis includes projections for a range of dwelling unit counts allowed under this zoning category and adequately addresses traffic issues raised during the hearing before the Planning Commission. It is staff ' s view that the proposal conforms to the most applicable policies set forth in the General Plan, creates a future site for a community center to serve Huntington Beach residents, and allows for a coordinated, consolidated residential development on the subject property. • CGP 82-8 (Appeal) November 22, 1982 Page 3 FUNDING SOURCE: None required. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: The City Council may uphold the Planning Commission' s action and make a finding of non-conformance with the General Plan. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Letter of Appeal 2. Revised Traffic Study 3 . Staff Report - October 5, 1982 4 . Staff Report - October 19, 1982 5 . Staff Report - November 2 , 1982 6 . Planning Commission Minutes - October 5, 1982 7 . Planning Commission Minutes - October 19, 1982 8 . Planning Commission Minutes - November 2, 1982 CWT:JWP:BA:df BA J, Cff7f OF HUNT'ING°1NTH B EAC" :�•`: INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON REACH To Jim Palin From Les Evans Director of Development Services City Engineer Subject Traffic Analysis Relative to Date November 13 , 1982 General Dlan Conformance No. 82-8 The Traffic Division of the Public Works Depattment has reviewed the traffic impacts related to General Plan Conformance No. 82-8 and Zone Change No. 82-15 which abuts the property north of Utica between 17th and Lake Streets. The adjacent streets are targeted for certain improvements whether or not the property north of Utica between Lake and 17th Streets develops. The improvements include modifying the intersection of Plain/17th/Utica in such a matter to favor traffic traveling on 17th Street and Plain Street north of Utica. The signal at this location will also be upgraded and modified to accommodate the physical changes. Signalization of the Yorktown/Lake intersection is currently planned for the future. Our analysis assumes that Lake Street and Utica will be fully im- proved adjacent to the subject property. That the portion of Pine Street within the .limits of the property will be vacated, that 17th Street will be closed at Utica and that ultimately the east side of Lake Street will also be improved. Your staff has indicated that there are three possible alternatives for development of these properties. Each alternative has been evaluated for traffic generation as follows : Alternatives Trip Generation 1. Low density 840 trips/day (6. 5 D.U./AC = 70 condos) 2. Medium density 1000 trips/day (10 . 0 D.U. /AC = 100 condos) 3. High density 1200 trips/day (15 . 0 D.U./AC = 150 condos) In distributing the trips to the existing roadway system, it was assumed that no vehicle access would be provided onto Utica and that the only vehicle access would be onto Lake Street. The existing and resulting traffic volumes on Yorktown , Utica and Lake for each alternative are tabulated on the following page : Memo to Jim Pali w Traffic Analysis Nov. 18 , 1982 Page 2 DISTRIBUTION Existing 70 Units 100 Units 150 Units Utica 1750 1920 1950 1990 Lake 3800 4640 4800 5000 Yorktown 5150 5750 5860 6010 It does not appear that the additional traffic generated by any of the alternatives would significantly affect traffic volumes on the adjacent street system. In addition, your staff has requested us to evaluate the traffic impacts which could be anticipated if a community center of approxi- mately 11 , 000 square feet was constructed near the Main/Utica corner of the subject property. Based on observations of the Senior_ Citi- zen Center at 17th and Orange, it does not appear that the 110 vehicles per day which would be generated by the center would appreciably affect traffic volumes on the surrounding street system. However, access to the facility would have to be carefully addressed to avoid encouraging increased traffic on Utica. Also adequate convenient parking should be provided to ensure that parking for special events and regulAr functions did not overflow onto Utica, Pine and Park. At this time there is not enough specific informa- tion on the Community Center Project to evaluate potential access and parking problems. LE:KH: lw MINUTES Council Chamber, Civic Center Huntington Beach, California Mond /, December 6, 1982 A tape recording of this meeting is on file in the City Clerk's Office Mayor Mandic called the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach to order at 7:30 P.M. CEREMONY - INVOCATION The Flag Ceremony was conducted by Girl Scout Troop #62, Karla Green, Leader. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Vicky Flowers. The Invocation was given by Karrin Green. ROLL CALL I Present: Pattinson, Thomas, MacAllister, Mandic, Finley, Bailey, Kelly Absent: None PROCLAMATION - DECEMBER 12, 1982 - "CAROLING DAY IN HUNTINGTON BEACH" Mayor Mandic presented a proclamation designating December 12, 1982 as "Caroling Day in Huntington Beach" to Edward Thomas, Chairman of the Board of West Orange County YMCA. PRESENTATION - "VOLUNTEER OF THE MONTH" - FRAN ANDRADE Mayor Mandic presented a plaque to Fran Andrade "Volunteer of the Month for the Month of November" for her work on the Human Resources Board and in the Oak View area. COMMENDATION - DOUG ELSON - COMMUNITY CLINIC Mayor Mandic presented a plaque to Doug Elson, former Executive Director, for his outstanding efforts on behalf of the public at the Huntington Beach Community Clinic. Mr. Elson left the clinic on November 30, 1982. PRESENTATION - $10,000 - FROM AMINOIL FOR OAK VIEW CENTER Mayor Mandic accepted a check for $10,000 from William Donnelly representing Aminoil USA, Inc. for the Oak View Center. PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL TO PC DENIAL OF GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE 82-8 - CONTINUED UNTIL FPPC/AG RULING - HEARING CLOSED The Mayor.announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing to consider an appeal filed by Councilman Pattinson of the action taken by the Planning Commission on November 2, 198 2 regarding General Plan Conformance No. 82-8. The following specific action was appealed: a finding of noncon- Page #2 - Council Minutes - 12/6/82 formance with the General Plan regarding the vacation of Pine Street between Seventeenth Street and Utica Avenue, to Yorktown Avenue, and the declaration of a .31— acre parcel near the intersection of Seventeenth Street and Yorktown Avenue as surplus. The City Clerk announced that all legal requirements for publication and posting had been met, and that she had received communications from Mrs. R. Letson and M. 0. Remington in opposition to said appeal , as well as an informal petition from the Lake Park Neighborhood listing approximately 181 signatures in opposition. The Director of Development Services presented a staff report regarding the matter. The Mayor declared the hearing open. Bob Bolen spoke in opposition to the appeal . Craig Gireth spoke in opposition to the appeal citing impact on the surround- ing neighborhood. Ed Ogden spoke in opposition to the appeal citing parking problems in the area. Dave Eadie representing the Huntington Beach Company spoke in favor of the appeal , he stated there was no project planned for the site at this time. John Peterson spoke in opposition to the appeal and cited possible problems if a community center were located in the area. There being no one present to speak further on the matter and there being no further protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor. Councilman Thomas left the room. Discussion was held regarding the appeal . Following a discussion with the City Attorney, Councilman Pattinson requested the matter be continued until he could obtain a ruling from the Fair Political Practices Commission and the Attorney General 's Office regarding a possible conflict of interest. A motion was made by Bailey, seconded by MacAllister, to continue a decision regarding the appeal until Councilman Pattinson could receive a ruling from the Fair Political Practices Commission and the Attorney General 's Office regarding a possible conflict of interest, and directed that renotification be given at that time. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: MacAllister, Mandic, Finley, Bailey, Kelly NOES: None NOT VOTING: Pattinson ABSENT: Thomas (out of the room) tie>ti 'Page #3 - Council Minut• - 12/6/82 • PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL TO THE PC DENIAL OF ZC 82-15 - HEARING CONTINUED PEN UNTIL FPPC/AG RULING The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing to consider an appeal filed by Councilman Pattinson to the denial of a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres of property located north of Utica Avenue, between 17th and Lake Streets from R1-0 (Low Density Residential combined with oil production) and RI-O-CD (Low Density Residential combined with oil production within Civic District) to R2-O-PD-CD (Medium Density Residential District combined with oil production, Planned Development Suffix and within Civic District) . He stated that Negative Declaration No. 82-40 would be considered in conjunction with Zone Case No. 82-15. The City Clerk announced that all legal requirements for notification, publica- tion and posting had been met, and that she had received a communication from Mrs. R. Letson opposed to said appeal and that additional communications and informal petition received by the Planning Commission were on file in the City Clerk's Office. A motion was made by MacAllister, seconded by Kelly, to continue consideration of an appeal to the Planning Commission's denial of Zone Case 82-15 until Councilman Pattinson received a ruling from the Fair Political Practices Com- mission and the Attorney General 's Office regarding a possible conflict of interest and directed that renotification be given at that time. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: MacAllister, Mandic, Finley, Bailey, Kelly NOES: None NOT VOTING: Pattinson ABSENT: Thomas (out of the room) RECESS - RECONVENE The Mayor called a recess of Council at 9:13 P.M. The meeting was reconvened at 9:21 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL TO PC DENIAL OF CUP 82-26 - PC OVERRULED - CUP APPROVED The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing to consider an appeal filed by ARCO Petroleum Company, on behalf of Atlantic Rich- field Company, to the denial of Conditional Use Permit No. 82-26, a request to permit the conversion of an existing service station into a convenience market combined with gasoline sales within the C4 (Highway Commercial District) located at the southwest corner of Goldenwest Street and Heil Avenue (16501 Goldenwest Street) . The City Clerk announced that all legal requirements for notification, publica- tion and posting had been met, and that she had received no communications or written protests to the matter. The Mayor declared the hearing open. The following people spoke in favor of the convenience market: Sam Blick, Monir Malko, Phillip Johnson, George Scott, Christopher Lahage and William Malko. IN THE (�1� w+o� �_ V �CS Superior Court OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA In and for the County of Orange CITY OF H U N T I N G T O N BEACH PROOF OF PUBLICATION CITY CLERK PUBLIC HEARING P ,o 51 /d State of California ) �/��+�f� S County of Orange )ss• CE OF A P R I L L. ELLIOTT ANPPPEEALL TOO' PC DEMMALL OF GENERAL PLAN CONFOitMANM That I am and at all times herein mentioned was a citizen of NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN.that a 10 f h the United States,over the age of twenty-one years,and that I public hearing will hisIeld,by,the:City U am not a art to,nor interested in the above entitled matter; Council of the City of Huntington Beech, Tr, S S V Q party in the Council Chamber of t"Civic Cen' X>Qf, that I am the principal clerk of the printer of the ter,Huntington Beach,at the hour of 7:30 P.M.,or.as soon thereafter as paeeibk on, Monday the 8,th day of De. her,1982,' H U N T I N G T O N BEACH I N D. REVIEW for the uurPoee_o�,considering an appeal filed by Councilman plittineon of the ac- a newspaper of general circulation,published in the City of tion taken by t3e'.1win1'1ie'Confmiseion on November 2 1982 regarding General Plan Conformance _re 8.The follow- H U N T I N G T O N BEACH I ing ape cific action a eppeakd a tmd;njl i of nonconformance pith the General Plan County of Orange and which newspaper is published for the regarding the vacation of Pine Street be. tween Seventeenth Stnset and Utica Ave., disemination of local news and intelligence of a general charac- the'caatiodof 06r6ors'of Seventeenth ter, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had Street from Utica Avenue to Yorktowh and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, Avenue,end art deintersect of o S en- P P Y g acre parcel Dear the intersection of Seven_ and which newspaper has been established, printed and pub- teenth Street and Yorktown Avenue-as lished at regular intervals in the said County of Orange fora surpgallus. period exceeding one year; that the notice, of which the parttment�lptwn r on file is the De- Developmant Services Office. j annexed'is a printed copy, has been published in the regular All interested perions am invited coat; and entire issue of said newspaper,and not in an supplement tend ford hearing and id appe then other Y PP 'ions for of against said appeal.Further thereof,on the following dates,to wit: information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk,'2000 Main St., nti ungtoo Beach,CA 92648-(714)538- NOV. '18 r 1982 QATED27:, November 0,1482 CITY OF HUNTINGTONBRACH By Alicia Hf,Went north City Clerk `iov.M 1992 Beach Ind.Rev.#3M I certify(or declare) under penalty of perjury that the forego- ing is true and correct. Dated at.......G. RDEN• GRO.VE.•........•....•...• 19th NOV. 82 California, is ........day of ..........19........ � ,p ,p /Y . "" :� �.................. SG G Signature f 8 a� Form No.POP 92082 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date November 22, 1982 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrat Prepared by: James W. Palin, Director of Development Services 4o e Subject: GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE NO. 8 2-8 (APPEAL) Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: C/ STATEMENT OF ISSUE: General Plan Conformance No. 82-8 considers a proposal by the Department of Public Works to vacate Pine Street between Seventeenth Street and Utica Avenue, vacate portions of Seventeenth Street from Utica Avenue to Yorktown Avenue, and declare a .31t acre parcel near the intersection of Seventeenth Street and Yorktown Avenue as surplus to the needs of the City. On November 2, 1982, after public testimony on the proposal, the Planning Commission made a finding of non-conformance with the City' s General Plan. Although citing no specific General Plan policies, the Planning Commission made a' finding of non-conformance based on inadequate information from staff concerning the purpose and intent of the proposal as required in California Government Code Section 65402 (a) . On November 5, 1982 an appeal to the City Council was filed with the City Clerk concerning the Planning Commission' s action. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning staff recommends that the City Council find General Plan Conformance No. 82-8 to be in conformance with the General Plan. Staff feels the Department of Public Works' proposal conforms to the most applicable policies set forth in the General Plan: A. Promote the rational use of land and other natural resources (Land Use) . B. Capitalize on the outdoor and environmental potential of the City by developing community centers that combine high schools, community parks, recreational centers, branch libraries, and other uses in one area (Land Use) . C. Insure a full range of community facilities that provide for the general public ' s health, safety, and welfare by providing meeting centers for civic and other groups (Land Use) . I Gam' PIO 4/81 CGP 82-8 (Appeal) November 22, 1982 _ z Page 2 D. Site new City buildings and facilities in the areas where• existing and planned land uses are compatible with the facility that is being proposed (Community Facilities) . E. Promote the provision of adequate community facilities within the City of Huntington Beach (Community Facilities) . F. ' Develop a sy.stem •of arterial streets and highways that ensures the safe and efficient movement of people and goods. (Circulation) . • G. Provide a: transportation system that is consistent with efforts to, minimize adverse environmental and aesthetic effects (Circulation) . ANALYSIS: Section 65402 (a) of the California. Governmental Code states that no real property shall be acquired or disposed of until the location, pur- pose, and extent of such acquisition or disposition has been submitted to and reported upon by the planning agency as to conformity with the General Plan. As summarized in the attached staff reports, General Plan Conformance No. 82-8 would accommodate the needs of both the City and the Huntington Beach Company. The proposal would allow for consolidation of parcels currently owned by. the Huntington Beach Company into a more buildable site: In exchange, the City wou,ld .be conveyed a .84t acre parcel near the northeast corner of Main Street and Utica Avenue for future devel- opment of a community center.- By vacating a portion. of Seventeenth Street adjacent to the parcel, the City would acquire a total buildable site of approximately 2.4± •acres comprised of the '.84± acre parcel acquired from the Huntington Beach Company and extending across Seven- teenth Street onto Civic Center property ('.61± acre of' Seventeenth Street and .93± acre of Civic Center property) . The street vacations and ex- change of property were discussed and informally agreed to in- concept by the City Council on June 28, • 1982. The City has. additionally initiated. a zone change for the. area north of Utica Avenue between Seventeenth Street and Lake Street to allow for a medium density planned residential development, in accordance with with the June 28 informal understanding between the parties. The street vacations and property exchange would create a -more buildable site for such a development. A revised traffic analysis of potential traffic volumes anticipated from residential development on• the subject prop- erty, prepared by the. Department of Public Works, is included as an attachment. The revised traffic analysis includes projections for a range of dwelling unit counts allowed under this zoning category and adequately addresses traffic issues raised during the hearing before the Planning Commission. It is staffs view that the proposal conforms to the most applicable policies set forth in the General Plan, creates a future site for a community center to serve Huntington Beach residents; and allows for a coordinated, consolidated residential development on the subject property. f�.,�.4 CGP 82-8 (Appeal) • November 22, 1982 Paige 3 FUNDING SOURCE: None required. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: The City Council may uphold the Planning Commission' s action and make a finding of non-conformance with the General Plan. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Letter of Appeal 2. Revised Traffic Study 3. Staff Report - October 5, 1982 4. Staff Report - October 19, 1982 5. Staff Report - November 2, 1982 6 . Planning Commission Minutes ,- October 5, 1982 7. Planning Commission Minutes - October 19, 1982 8 . Planning Commission Minutes - November 2, 1982 CWT:JWP:BA:df BA CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To Jim Palin From Les Evans00, Director of Development Services City Engineer Subject Traffic Analysis Relative to Date November 18, 1982 General Plan Conformance No. 82-8 The Traffic Division of the Public Works Department has reviewed the traffic impacts related to General Plan Conformance No. 82-8 and Zone Change No. 82-15 which abuts the property north of Utica between 17th and Lake Streets. The adjacent streets are targeted for certain improvements whether or not the property north of Utica between Lake and 17th Streets develops._ The improvements include modifying the intersection of Main/17th/Utica in such a matter to favor traffic traveling on 17th Street and Main Street north of Utica. The signal at this location will also be upgraded and modified to accommodate the physical changes. Signalization of the Yorktown/Lake intersection is currently planned for the future. Our analysis assumes that Lake Street and Utica will be fully im- proved adjacent to the subject property. That the portion of Pine Street within the limits of the property will be vacated, that 17th Street will be closed at Utica and that ultimately the east side of Lake Street will also be improved. Your staff has indicated that there are three possible alternatives for development of these properties. Each alternative has been evaluated for traffic generation as follows: Alternatives Trip Generation 1. Low density 840 trips/day (6. 5 D.U./AC = 70 condos) 2. Medium density 1000 trips/day (10. 0 D.U./AC = 100 condos) 3. High density 1200 trips/day (15.0 D.U./AC = 150 condos) In distributing the trips to the existing roadway system, it was assumed that no vehicle access would be provided onto Utica and that the only vehicle access would be onto Lake Street. The existing and resulting traffic volumes on Yorktown, Utica and Lake for each alternative are tabulated on the following page: 3 2A p memo to Jim Palin Traffic Analysis Nov. 18, 1982 Page 2 DISTRIBUTION Existing 70 Units 100 Units 150 Units Utica 1750 1920 1950 1990 Lake 3800 4640 4800 5000 Yorktown 5150 5750 5860 6010 It does not appear that the additional traffic generated by any of the alternatives would significantly affect traffic volumes on the adjacent street system. In addition, your staff has requested us to evaluate the traffic impacts which could be anticipated if a community center of approxi- mately 11,000 square feet was constructed near the Main/Utica corner of the subject property. Based on observations of the Senior Citi- zen Center at 17th and Orange, it does not appear that the 110 vehicles per day which would be generated by the center would appreciably affect traffic volumes on the surrounding street system. However, access to the facility would have to be carefully addressed to avoid encouraging increased traffic on Utica. Also adequate convenient parking should be provided to ensure that parking for special events and regulAr functions did not overflow onto Utica, Pine and Park. At this time there is not enough specific informa- tion on the Community Center Project to evaluate potential access and parking problems. LE:KH:lw .y G FH CITY OF HUNTIN BEACH CITY COUNCIL CC I ►TION • • M-NIINC►ON MACH TO Alicia Wentworth, FROM Puncilman Pattznson City Clerk SUBJECT APPEAL TO DENY CONFORMANCE GATE November 5� X�.9$2 WITH GENERAL PLAN 82-8 & ZONE CHANGE NO. 82-15 ' ,r This communication will serve as written notice of my appeal to the denial of Zone Change No. 82-15 and Conformance with General Plan No. 82-8. I feel that the proposed rezoning and street vacations are consistent with the General Plan and with the purposes established for the Yorktown-Lake Redevelopment Pro3ect. r r 1 i I ' RP:lp t , , I r I rb , , i r j I r y Y , V / sraf f huntington beach development services department REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Department of Development Services DATE: October 5, 1982 SUBJECT: CONFORMANCE WITH GENERAL PLAN NO. 82-8 APPLICANT: Department of Public Works RECOMMENDATION: Find in conformance with the General Plan PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Vacation of Pine Street between Seventeenth -Street and Utica Avenue; vacation of portions of Seventeenth Street from Utica to Yorktown Avenues; declare surplus a .31 acre parcel near the intersection of Seventeenth Street and Yorktown Avenue LOCATION: The proposal is located within the Yorktown- Lake Redevelopment Project Area bounded by Main Street, Yorktown Avenue, Lake Street, and Utica Avenue (see attached map) . BACKGROUND: Section 65402 (a) of the California Government Code states that no W" A real property shall be disposed of, no street shall be vacated or abandoned . . . until the location, purpose and extent of such acquisition or disposition . . . have been submitted to and re- ported upon by the planning agency as to conformity with the General Plan. In order to allow for future development of a proposed community center, the City has negotiated with the Huntington Beach Company f to acquire an . 84 acre parcel near the northeast corner of Main Street and Utica Avenue south of the Civic Center. By vacating a . 79 acre portion of Seventeenth Street adjacent to the parcel, the City would gain a buildable site for a community center which will extend across the vacated portion of Seventeenth Street onto the existing Civic Center property, creating a total buildable site of 2. 4± acres. Huntington Community Park, to be constructed near the southwest corner of Utica Avenue and Main Street near Huntington Beach High School, is largely planned for active recreational uses such as 7�_' P-11 mom or" un A-F M-23A CGP' 82-8 w - October 5, 1982 Page 2 racquetball, baseball, and volleyball. While community centers are normally incorporated into community parks, Huntington Community Park does not have sufficient acreage for such a facility. Develop- ment of a community center on the proposed site would provide a relatively centralized location for social, educational, and civic functions in close proximity to the park. In exchange for acquiring the property, the proposal requires the City to vacate Pine Street (.93 acres) between Utica Avenue and Seventeenth Street, and 1. 06 acres of Seventeenth Street located south of Yorktown Avenue to the Huntington Beach Company. Addition- ally, the proposal requires that the City delcare a .31 acre parcel south of Yorktown Avenue surplus to the needs of the City and deed the property to the Huntington Beach Company. The proposed street vacations and surplus property declaration would allow for the con- solidation of the parcels owned by the Huntington Beach Company into a more buildable site. CONFORMANCE ANALYSIS: Pine Street is currently used primarily by Civic Center employees and visitors for access to City parking lots and to accommodate overflow parking. The 1. 06 acre portion of Seventeenth Street pro- posed for vacation to the Huntington Beach Company, located south of Yorktown Avenue, is a cul-de-sac with no through traffic. Should both these properties be vacated, the Civic Center would lose an estimated 90 parking spaces. Although still in the planning stages, the proposed community center site as envisioned will cover the . 84 acre parcel deeded to the City by the Huntington Beach Company, extend over the vacated portion, .; of the Seventeenth Street, and onto a portion of the Civic Center property. This site configuration would block a primary access route into the Police Department facility. However, the final plans for the community center will incorporate an alternative entry/exit route for the Police Department as part of the facility' s design. Until the center is constructed, the City will continue to use the existing exit on Seventeenth Street even though the street has officially been vacated. General Plan Conformance No. 82-8 considers two street vacations and a declaration of surplus property in exchange for acquiring a site adjacent to the Civic Center suitable for a community center. The proposal would not significantly impact the Civic Center area except by reducing available parking space. The City' s General Plan in- ' cludes a number of specific policies for encouraging both community centersand residential development which conforms with the subject proposal ' s intent. General Plan Conformance No. 82-8 would further the following policies set forth in the General Plan: �1 CGP 82-8 October 5, 1982 Page 3 (1) Capitalize on the outdoor and environmental potential of the City by developing community centers that combine high schools, community parks, recreational centers, branch libraries, and other uses in one area. (Land Use. ) (2) Insure a full range of community facilities that provide for the general public ' s health, safety and welfare by providing meeting centers for civic and other groups. (Land Use. ) (3) Site new City buildings and facilities in areas where existing and planned land uses are compatible with the facility that is being proposed. (Community Facilities. ) (4) Promote the provision of adequate community facilities within the City of Huntington Beach. (Community Facilities. ) (5) Promote the rational use of land and other natural resources. (Land Use. ) ATTACHMENTS: 1. Area Map JWP:BA:df e �� . . N YQ RK l� za �c h Its d- 139.7 HUNTINGTON BENCH � CIVIC CENTER L AlLu r: a° Lu 1 t,i i l � •. . . . . . T-- �t . . . . . . OQ n `1 ji�tiitli t i y1 • • • • • • �• • • UTICA AVENUE SURPLUS CITY LAND DEEDEDTO H.B. 0. STREETS VACATED TO H.B. CO. STREETS VACATED FOR COMMUNITY CENTER SITE -' FEE PROPERTY DEEDED TO CITY FOR COMMUNITY CENTER SITE J huntington beach development services department STA f f SPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Department of Development Services DATE: October 19, 1982 SUBJECT: CONFORMANCE WITH GENERAL PLAN NO. 82-8 (Cont. ) General Plan Conformance No. 82-8 was originally presented to the Planning Commission on October 5, 1982, but was contineud to allow staff additional time to compile information on parking requirements in the Civic Center area and the elements of the City informal under- , standing with the Huntington Beach Company. As stated in the attached staff report, General Plan Conformance 82-8 considers the vacation of Pine Street between Seventeenth Street and Utica Avenue, the vacation of portions of Seventeenth Street from Utica Avenue to Yorktown Avenue, and the declaration of a . 31 acre par- cel near the intersection of Seventeenth Street and Yorktown Avenue as surplus to the needs of the City. Demand for parking in the Civic Center lots currently exceeds capacity by 25 percent during peak operating hours, according to the Traffic Division of the Department of Public Works. City employees and the general public also commonly use the entire length of Seventeenth Street and portions of Pine Street for additional overflow parking areas. The existing Civic Center lots have capacity for 403 cars, including 75 spaces reserved for the general public, 96 Spaces reserved for City vehicles, and 232 spaces reserved for City employee parking. These totals include only the on-site parking lots and exclude Seventeenth and Pine Streets. Using Department of Public Works estimates, an additional 25 percent, or 101, parking spaces are needed during peak ..ours to provi to adequate parking for tlLe Civic Center. ah;L6 estim-, ate results in a total parking need of 504 spaces . If the parking need for the Civic Center is determined by using the R5 (Office/Pro- fessional) parking standard of one space per 300 square feet of floor area, a total of 512 spaces would be needed. The 84 existing front end and parallel spaces along Seventeenth Street offset this deficiency to a significant extent. However, Seventeenth Street originally con- tained 40 parallel spaces when the Civic Center was built in 1974 . Several years ago, Seventeenth Street was restriped to allow front end parking, which increased the number of spaces to 84 . The proposed elimination of 54 spaces from Seventeenth Street would reduce parking to 30 spaces, approximately 10 spaces less than existed prior to the restriping program. The reduction of parking along Seventeenth Street AbL A-FM 23A CUP 82-8 October 19, 1982 Page 2 . would, therefore, leave a deficiency of 16 percent within the Civic Center area. If the parallel spaces along Main Street and Yorktown Avenue are included as Civic Center parking, then the deficiency is reduced to approximately 7 percent. The provisions of the City' s informal understanding with the Huntington Beach Company concerning the- Pacific Electric right-of-way, the "Ranch" project, and Pine Street property are attached to this staff report. JWP;.2:df Attachments: 1. 'Staff Report dated October. 5, 1982 2. Draft Site Exchange Understanding with the H.B. Company t'Hb I t 11. LL.w i IN 11. 10h I L.ALtAI. 1%1 h11 I Ut h111 ,r AN' IMMUNITY CENTER SITE EXCHANGE A. PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY S TRACT 77 STREETS 1 . HBCo will quitclaim to City the right-of-way from Garfield to Clay and from Yorktown to Pecan (Q.C. deeds & legal descriptions provided by HBCo) . 2. City will quitclaim to HBCo the right-of-way from Clay to Yorktown N.C . deeds & legal descriptions provided by HBCo) . 3-. City wi l 1 abandon & vacate Tract 77 streets (Alabama, Oregon , State, Yorktown, 17th) located within boundary of proposed Ranch subdivision in favor of HBCo. (Deeds provided by HBCo) . • y 4. City will .document that all park and recreational facility dedication requirements - land and/or in lieu fees - related to the development of the 50-acre Ranch project are waived. Y B. RANCH PROJECT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AND SITE PLAN 1 . Mansion Properties/Urban West will revise Ranch tentative map and site plan pursuant to City' Council direction of June 28, 1982. Planned target date fo.r submittal of revised "Ranch plans is in time for mid-November Planning Commission hearing. 2. Mansion Properties/Urban West will donate $30 ,000 to the City, to be used exclusively for development of and improvements within the Blufftop Park opposite the Townlot area along Pacific Coast Ilwy. C. PINE STREET PROPERTY EXCHANGE 1. HBCo will provide all necessary deeds and legal descriptions for the exchange of fee parcels at the north and south ends of 17th Street and all legal descriptions for those portions of Yorktown , 17th , and Pine Streets to be abandoned and vacated in favor of the respective parties (City of HB, HBCo, H.Pacific Corp. ) . 2. HBCo wi l 1 prepare and submit a tentative parcel map covering HBCo's resulting ownership. •. 3. City will process all necessary street and alley abandonments and vacations , all actions necessary to exchange fee parcels , and will execute all grant and quitclaim deeds. 4. City will process tentative parcel map and will initiate a zone change from R1-0-CD and CF-C to R2-0-CD and CF-C. All items in A & C requiring a finding of General Plan Conformance or ` Planning Commission approval will be scheduled for concurrent action by the Planning Commission . All items in A & C requiring Council approval will be scheduled for concurrent • City Council action. huntington beach development services department L STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Development Services DATE: November 2, 1982 SUBJECT: CONFORMANCE WITH GENERAL PLAN NO. 82-8 (Continued) General Plan Conformance No. 82-8, originally presented to the Planning Commission on October 5, 1982, was continued to the Octo- ber 19, 1982 meeting to allow staff additional time to consider parking requirements in the Civic Center area (see attached staff " report) . At the October 19 meeting, the Planning Commission again continued consideration of the proposal until staff further analyzed potential traffic and circulation impacts of the pro3ect on surround- ing neighborhood areas. A_ As stated in the attached staff reports, General Plan Conformance No. 82-8 considers the vacation of Pine Street between Seventeenth Street and Utica Avenue, the vacation of portions of Seventeenth Street from Utica Avenue to Yorktown Avenue, and the declaration of a . 31 acre parcel near the intersection of Seventeenth Street and Yorktown Avenue as surplus to the needs of the City. The proposed street vacations and surplus property would allow for consolidation of the parcels owned by the Huntington Beach Company into a more buildable site. In exchange, the Huntington Beach Company would convey to the City a .84 acre parcel near the northeast corner of Main Street and Utica Avenue for future development of a community center. By vacating a portion of Seventeenth Street ad3acent to the parcel, the City would acquire a total buildable site of approximately 2.4 acres comprised of the . 84 acre parcel acquired from the Hunting- ton Beach Company and extending across Seventeenth Street onto Civic Center property. The City has initiated a zone change for the area north of Utica ' Avenue between Seventeenth Street and Lake Street to allow a medium density planned residential development. In analyzing potential traffic volumes anticipated from residential development on the sub- 3ect property, staff researched two previous traffic studies of the area prepared in 1976 and 1977. Staff did not use these studies in the analysis, however, because they do not accurately reflect the existing circulation system and are inappropriate to pro3ect future traffic impacts. Since the studies do not reflect existing condi- tions, a traffic and circulation analysis of both a medium density planned development and a single-family lot subdivision on the sub- 3ect property, prepared by the Department of Public Works, is in- cluded in the attachments. A FM-23A 11 i GPC No. 82-8 (Cont. ) November 2, 1982 Page 2 ATTACHMENTS : 1. Traffic/Circulation Analysis 2. Staff Report - Conformance with General Plan 82-8 , dated 10-19-82 3. Staff Report - Conformance with General Plan 82-8 , dated 10-5-82 BA:jlm 1RA 0 • Apprc 3 . as Amended 10-19-82 MINUTES t HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION 6m Council Chambers - Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California TUESDAY, OCTOBER 5, 1982 - 7:00 PM COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Higgins, Livengood, Winchell, Schumacher, Mirjahangir COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Paone, Porter In the absence of both Chairman Paone and Vice Chairman Porter, the meeting was called_ to order by Savoy Bellavia. ON MOTION BY LIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY HIGGINS, COMMISSIONER WINCHELL WAS ELECTED TO SERVE AS ACTING CHAIRMAN BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES : Higgins, Livengood, Schumacher, Mirjahangir NOES: None ABSENT: Paone, Porter ABSTAIN: Winchell 7 CONSENT AGENDA: At the request of Commissioner Livengood, Consent Agenda Item A-2 (Conformance with General Plan No. 82-8) was pulled off the consent agenda for separate consideration. ON MOTION BY LIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY HIGGINS THE REMAINDER OF THE CONSENT AGENDA, CONSISTING OF THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 21, 1982, WAS APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Higgins, Livengood, Winchell, Mirjahangir NOES: None ABSENT: Paone, Porter ABSTAIN: Schumacher ITEM A-1: Conformance with General Plan No. 82-8. Vacation , of Pine Street between Seventeenth Street and Utica Avenue; vacation of portions of Seventeenth Street from Utica to Yorktown Avenues; declare surplus a . 31 acre parcel near the intersection of Seventeenth Street and Yorktown Avenue. With the use of slides, Charles Clark made a presentation of the �y proposal, pointing out the configuration. of the streets to be h, vacated and informing the Commission that two alleys within the area would also be vacated. The vacated area of Pine Street will "V be .93 acres between Utica and Seventeenth Street, with the portion of Seventeenth Street south of Yorktown amounting to 1 . 06 acres. Minutes, H.B. Planning Commission October 5, 1982 Page 2 With the alley vacation, this will mean approximately 2. 5 'acres of land to be vacated to the Huntington Beach Company. The proposed vacation would allow for the consolidation of the parcels owned by the Huntington Beach Company into a more buildable site.. In exchange the City 'of Huntington Beach would acquire from the Huntington Beach Company an . 84 acre parcel near the northeast corner of Main Street and Utica Avenue south of the Civic Center. This will allow the City to gain a 2 .4 ± acre site, through the use of a vacated portion of Seventeenth Street and extension onto the existing Civic . Center property, for the purpose of constructing a community center. This. center would provide a centralized location for social, educa- tional, and civic functions. Commissioner Schumacher questioned the disparity in acreage figures, asking why the City would consider exchanging .84 acres for 2 .5 acres, almost two and one-half times as much. Secretary Palin then reviewed the history of recent negotiations between the City and the. Huntington Beach Company in regard to the railroad right-of-way. He informed the commission that this project is a part of an agreement which will result in the Huntington Beach Company quitclaiming to the City its interest in the right-of-way from Garfield to Clay Avenues and Yorktown Avenue south, donating $30, 000 for the construction of the Blufftop Park, and agreeing to take into consideration as a part of the overall agreement the preservation for possible future public use the railroad right-of-way through The Ranch project. The agree- ment also includes vacation to the Company of the -paper streets within The Ranch boundaries . Commissioner Livengood questioned staff on the reduction of 90 park- ing spaces presently used by the Civic Center: Staff informed the Commission that restriping of the remaining portion of Seventeenth Street could partially alleviate the loss of the parking presently taking place on Pine Street, and additional parking will be available on the section of Seventeenth Street at Main which will be vacated with sufficidnt width to accommodate parking, adequate turning radius, and two-way traffic. Also, the proposed community center will have parking which. can be used by employees as well. Future access changes were discussed by the Commission. Mr. Livengood asked what parking count would be required for the Civic Center if it had been required to provide the same ratio of parking as would . any other office pro- ject of the same nature, and indicated that he would prefer to see that information prior to making a decision on this conformance. Com- missioner Higgins suggested that some alternative parking Sites should be identified as well. It was the consensus of the Commission that consideration of this request should be delayed until a survey of the Civic Center parking based on criteria the City uses for other commer- cial buildings is submitted. Commissioner Schumacher also indicated that she would like the next staff report to contain information ex- plaining the discrepancy in acreage of the exchange. L+. -2- 10-5-82 - P.C. Minutes,• H.B. Planning Commission October 5, 1982 Page Three ON MOTION BY LIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY HIGGINS, GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE NO. 82-8 WAS CONTINUED FOR TWO WEEKS, TO THE MEETING OF OCTOBER 19, 1982 , BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Livengood, Higgins, Winchell, Mirjahangir, Schumacher NOES: None ABSENT: Paone, Porter ABSTAIN: None ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: USE PERMIT NO. 82-23 - APPEAL Applicant: Ronald Wood/Bill Goodman Appeal to conditions of approval imposed by the Board of Zoning Adjustments pertaining to the side yard setback for a garage and a height limit for a proposed garage on property located on the south side of Williams Avenue (718 and 720 Williams Avenue) approx. 300 feet east of Florida Street. Commissioner Schumacher stated that she listened to the tape of the September 21th public hearing and, therefore, would be eligible to vote on this issue. Acting as chairperson, Grace Winchell stated that as the public hearing had previously been opened and closed at the September 21st meeting, discussion and a motion shall follow. Acting Secretary Webb distributed ground shots of the project to the Commission for information. At the request of Commissioner Mirjahangir the applicant, Mr. Bill Goodman, and the architect for the project, Sergio Esteves, addressed the Commission to explain their project and the reasons for the requested height and setbacks. They pointed out that al- though they are proposing six double garages there -would actually not be room to store twelve recreational vehicles, but that the structure would only accommodate five or six at most. Mr. Esteves also noted that adjacent to a commercial site the impact on the neighboring property should be minimal . Mr. Goodman also informed the Commission that if the tenants of the housing complex in which the parking structure would be located do not rent the garages they would remain empty. Also, the applicant stated his willing- ness to provide 10-foot setbacks on each side of the garage structure instead of going to zero as originally proposed. The ensuing Commission discussion included consideration of the possibility that approval could result in creating a mini-warehouse situation on the property, review of the setback alternatives, and consideration of the Fire Department requirement for sprinkler- Ing if the 15 foot garage height is allowed. _V ",0 _-I . I n-c Q� - p (, Minutes , H .B. Planning -ommission October 19 , 1982 Page 4 ZONE CHANGE NO. 82-15/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. '82-40 Applicant: City of Huntington Beach 691 A proposal to change the zoning from Rl-O (Low Density Residential combined with Oil Production) and R1-O-CD (Low Density Residential combined with Oil Production/Civic District) to R2-O-CD (Medium Density Residential combined with Oil Production/Civic District) on property located north of Utica Avenue between Seventeenth and Lake Streets. Conformance with General Plan No. 82-8 was also deferred to be dis- cussed at this point in the meeting. Savoy Bellavia informed the Commission that staff is asking for a continuance in order to include the "PD" suffix with the proposed rezoning. The Commission discussed parking and traffic flow in the general area, questioning where the additional parking for the Civic Center can be located, what the traffic considerations had been at the time the property was designated medium density on the General Plan, what plans if any exist for the extension of Utica Avenue across the rail- road right-of-way, and what documentation is available on street configuration. Les Evans of the Department of Public Works indicated that there is no intent to extend Utica Avenue, to his knowledge. He also pointed out that on this particular conformance there is no through circulation that would be cut off; there are, however, some internal circulation problems which can be addressed at the time a project is proposed on the subject property. Florence Webb noted that the zoning and the General Plan are inconsistent in the area and the rezoning will bring the property into conformity with the General Plan. Chairman Paone opened the public hearing, cautioning those present that in all likelihood the request will be continued and if they spoke to the subject at this meeting they could not address the Com- mission at the continued hearing. George Abbond questioned the legality of this procedure. A gentleman in the audience asked for and received information from staff on the public notification process which had been followed on this item. The Commission directed that the next staff report should include , prior traffic studies for the area, including future plans for Utica Avenue. ON MOTION' BY PORTER AND SECOND BY SCHUMACHER ZONE CHANGE NO. 82-15, NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 82-40, AND CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN NO. 82-8 WERE CONTINUED TO THE MEETING OF NOVEMBER 2, 1982, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Higgins, Winchell, Paone, Porter, Schumacher, Mirjahangir NOES: None ABSENT: Livengood �\l ABSTAIN: None r�+ Q'C � -4- 10-19-82 - P.C. V APP• VED ON 11-16-82 MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION Council Chambers - Civic Center 2000 Main Street • Huntington Beach, California TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 1982 - 7:00 PM COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Higgins, Livengood, Winchell, Paone, Porter, Schumacher, Mirjahangir CONSENT CALENDAR: Commissioner Porter requested that Item A-2, Extension of Time on Tentative Tract 10910 and Conditional Use Permit No. 80-4, be pulled for separate consideration. ON MOTION BY WINCHELL AND SECOND BY SCHUMACHER THE REMAINDER OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR, CONSISTING OF THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 19, 1982, AND EXTENSION OF TIME ON CONDITIONAL USE PER- MIT NO. 81-28, WAS APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Higgins, Winchell, Paone, Porter, Schumacher, Mirjahangir NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Livengood ON MOTION BY PORTER AND SECOND BY MIRJAHANGIR THE REQUEST FOR EX- TENSION OF TIME ON TENTATIVE TRACT 10910 AND CONDITIONAL USE PER- MIT NO. 80-4 WAS CONTINUED FOR THE PURPOSE OF REVIEWING THE SITE PLAN AS IT RELATES RESIDENTIAL AREAS, TO THE MEETING OF NOVEMBER 16 , 1982, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: ' Higgins, Livengood, Porter, Schumacher, Mirjahangir NOES: Winchell, Paone ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS : GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE NO. 82-8/ZONE CHANGE NO. 82-15/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 82-40 (Continued from 10-19-82) Initiated by the City of Huntington Beach A request to find the zone change in conformance with the General A 1 H.B. Planning Commission November 2 , 1982 Page 2 Plan and a request to change the zoning from Rl-O and R1-O-CD to R2-0-PD-CD at property located north of Utica Avenue between 17th and Lake Streets. Secretary Palin gave a brief presentation on the historical back-. ground of the area. He stated that original studies were conducted to analyze intensity levels resulting in the proposed zone change request. A compromise was agreed to when an impasse occurred in terms of the old railroad right-of-way, which -resulted in some trade-offs. It was envisioned that the City would declare a portion of the property as surplus on both sides of Pine Street. Access was discussed to come from Lake Street with a possible secondary access coming off of 17th Street. At this time the possibility of a com- munity center was discussed. However, at no time was there a dis- cussion of providing access off of Utica. The Secretary further re- minded the Commissioners that any proposed project would require the filing of appropriate applications - this would consequently re- quire notices to be sent to residents within 300 feet of the proposed project. Commissioners briefly discussed parking on 17th Street. Les Evans, City Engineer, gave a synopsis of the traffic report which was conducted by Public Works Department. Commissioner Porter asked if it was considered to widen Utica. Mr. Evans stated that it would not be feasible. Commissioner Porter questioned setbacks in terms of vacation at the north end of 17th Street. Secretary Palin sug- gested that if the Planning Commission was concerned, it could sug- gest that a qualified suffix be attached to the zone. Chairman Paone opened the public hearing. The following persons spoke against the proposed General Plan Confor- mance and Zone Change : Bob Bolman George Abon Faye Ogden John Pederson William Rodell Rick Murphy Verl Cowling Mr. Gusterhouse E. Rutherd Esther Danielson Craig Garris Bob Washguy Some issues raised by public testimony included complaints with the notification policy. Commissioners explained that even if residents were not close enough to be notified by mail, that public notices do appear in the Huntington Beach Independent. Also questioned was the issue of circulation, with possible heavy traffic going through residential streets that are populated with children. Complaints were also registered against the accuracy of the staff report. Residents also felt that the police cars would have trouble exiting from the station. Traffic volume and circulation were also cited. Along with the public testimony, a petition was submitted voicing the concerns against the proposed zone change and numerous letters against the proposal were entered into the record. -,v � • r H.B. Planning Commission November 2, 1982 Page 3 The public hearing was closed. Commission discussion continued with a discussion on density, vacation of streets, traffic circulation, etc. A motion was made by Livengood and seconded by Winchell to continue the General Plan Conformance to the meeting of December 7th, at which time a corrected traffic report would be submitted along with various information relative to the impact on the environment. After con- siderable discussion the maker and second withdrew their motion. A MOTION WAS MADE BY PORTER AND SECONDED BY SCHUMACHER TO FIND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE NO. 82-8 NOT IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL' PLAN AND NOT IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE GOVERNMENT CODE BECAUSE OF THE LACK OF ADEQUATE INFORMATION AND OF SUFFICIENT DEFINITION OF THE PURPOSE AND INTENT OF THE USE PROPOSED FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THE MOTION PASSED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Higgins, Livengood, Winchell, Porter, Schumacher, Mirjahangir NOES : Paone ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Some additional comments were made relating to the above motion. Com- missioner Schumacher felt that a senior center next to a high school did not seem compatible, nor would there be adequate buffer. Tom Tincher also added some comments relating to the consolidation of par- cels in the area. ON MOTION BY PORTER AND SECOND BY HIGGINS, NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 82-40 WAS APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Higgins, Livengood, Winchell, Paone, Porter, Mirjahangir NOES: Schumacher ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ON MOTION BY PORTER AND SECOND BY WINCHELL ZONE CHANGE NO. 82-15 WAS DENIED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE, AND FOR- WARDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDING DENIAL: FINDINGS: 1. The proposed density is not compatible with surrounding residential area. , 2. The proposed "PD" suffix would only compound an existing parking problem in the area. AYES: Livengood, Winchell, Paone, Porter, Schumacher, Mirjahangir NOES: Higgins ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ON MOTION BY PORTER AND SECOND BY WINCHELL STAFF WAS DIRECTED TO PRE- PARE A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT REDESIGNATING THE PROPERTY TO LOW DENSITY „�� FZESIDENTIAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: -9- 24 Al- vqV� 7a d OWCOMPLI 0,4 N Y �INfa , 6. N rn AL Publish 11-18-82 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO THE PC DENIAL OF GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE 82-8 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible on Monday the 6th day of December , 1982 . for the purpose of considering an appeal filed by Councilman Pattinson of the action taken by the Planning Commission on November 2, 1982 regarding General Plan Conformance No. 82-8. The following specific action is appealed: a finding of nonconformance with the General Plan regarding the vacation of Pine Street between Seventeenth Street and Utica Avenue, the vacation of portions of Seventeenth Street from Utica Avenue to Yorktown Avenue, and the declaration of a .31± acre parcel near the intersection of Seventeenth Street and Yorktown Avenue as surplus. A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services Office. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said appeal Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. 92648 - (714) 536-5227 DATED_ November 15, 1982 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk NOTICC9 TO CLERK TOO SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING © Q ITEM 6- 9A1r- 4 - f LA AJ 000I FOP-M P1A & U 7 —U TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE DATE: FROM: DF(AwPM fAJT SE�C'V ICES PLEASE SCHEDULE A �� JPPUBLIC HEARING USING THE ATTACHED LEGAL NOTICE FOR THE i1 DAY OF �i (:AP:'s are attached AP's will follow No AP's Initiated by: Planning Coumission Planning Department r Petition * Appeal Other T � Adoption of Environmental Status (x) x YES NO V!l,F, Refer to F�)& f 1- LD(C K H Planning Department - Extension # ` ;2--7 for additional information. * If appeal , please transmit exact wording; to be required in the legal . LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE ISHEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Pia of the City of Huntingto Beach, California, for the purpose of considering Q� *14 ice . a V4 ajj'W Cl C! ; u clril c L Ua C ntz )6L C P. all4 a . ek r a: - vu caz� a,-�k ck olu Ct"2"a; " JL42t—ow-m O'V4-'-A� "— Said hearing will be held at the hour of .,� P.M. , on .� 6 , Ict(5 a , in the Council Chambers Building of the Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing express th it opi�ions for or against the proposed G-�-� �� opt C ov�►c-�.ce � —�. Further information may be obtained from the City Planning Department. Telephone No. (714) 536-5271 DATED this _1.� day of Aj CITY PLANNING COMMISS N alMItA4- 0J- � By I I I I I I � ' --�-- - - -- ---- ------- - -------- --------------- --- -- ------- -- -------- - -- I 23--062-12 ma-is + 23-074-06 zc 'Rc]die L ; October S, 1982 �JH) I Qotn Msstti 1832 Main Street i I 17371 Drgyr Lane Huntington Beach, Calif I tknting on Beach. Calif 92648 ' I 92647 - ------------- -- -- - -- --� - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -,-- - ----- - -- - - - - - - _ 23-062-18 23-072-06 ; 23-074-18 Anthony P D Arrigo Gisela L Nett Killian T He land 3rd 1825 Park Street I 1836 We Street 1828 Pine Street Eintin gton Beach, calif ' Hntington Beach, Calif I Hntington Beach, Calif 22648 ; 92648 ' 92648 ----- -- ------------ -----I--- ----------------------'----- -- - - - - - - - 23-062-24 23-072-07 23-074-19 Lloyd E Danielson I Lake Park Estates ; Don 0 amft 1828 Main Street cJo F W Development Inc I 1830 Pine Street Hntingtran Beach, Calif i 15052 Springdale Street ; Huntingbon Beech, Calif 92648 5kiite A I 92648 ---- -------------- ---- - --- ------ -- ------- ----- ---- ------ ----- --- --- - i 23-062-29 I tLntingtm Beach, Calif ; 23-074-20 David C Frampton 92649 I Stephen 0 Batchelor 1834 Main Street I ; 1836 Pine Street Huntington Beach, Calif i I H ntimton Beach. Calif 926" I 92648 _ -------- -- ----- ----------- ------------- -- ------------ ---- -- - John L 3P�eterson i 23-074-01 i 23-074-21 live Day I Christopher Taylor 18M 17th Street Hoge P (Fear I 1840 Pine Street KxMington 9 Hur►ti Desch. Calif i 205 Utica Averwe ' , ngton Beach. Calif ------' kntington Beach. Calif 92W 1 92648 -------- -------- - ----------- ---- 23-072-OZ �-------- ---- ---- -------- - ---- 1 Daniel L l�xutryya 23-074-02 i 23-074-22 ' *amid N Gabeldon Richard J 1848 Lake Street 2023 Norvion Place , 1842 Pima Street gCnn Bosch. Calif 92648 Anaheim, Cali! i Huntington Eisach, Cal i f 92648 , 92806 92648 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -1 - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 72-03 Oliam R Riddell 23-074-03 23-074-23 William Lc)rwm E Paslni I Melvin 0 Rc3nington 1846 Lake street ' 1937 Lake Street ' P.O. Box 503 Huntington Beach, Calif ' 9 2648 � Huntington Beech, Calif i Eltuptington Beach, Calif 92648 92647 --------------- ----- ---------------- --------- -- --- - -- - - - - 23-072-04 I -- ---- 23-074-04 I 25--023-06 Michael HuskinsStreer ; Ek Bard J Gilliland Leonard L [fern 1831 Lake Street , 7012 Liberty Street Huntington Beach. Calif if untingtan Bewh, Calif I Eiunting-tcx i Ek:ach, Calif. 92648 I 92646 i 92647 - - -- - - - - - - - - -- - -- - - - -- - _L - - - - - - --- - - - -- - - - - - -- - - t - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I 2 �Murray i xsa23-o7�i--OS � 25--023-11 DonaDrld L Withem I Peter E van E.lten E n�tin�gbOn s� (al i f i Leo J Bn�agyecusn � 405 1 E th Street 10182 Beverly Drive I Huntington Beach, Calif 92648 i Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 I 92648 -- -- ----- ---------------►-------- -------------- --!-------- - - ----- -- - - - - I I I I I I ' I I I I , � I • I I � � I -------- ---------------- ----- --------------- --- -1 ----------- -- -- ----- 23-W-14 23-061-Q tiuntingtan Beech Cb. ZC 083-15 Dept of Vets Affairs of I Tau Division ; October 5, 1l82 (JH) State Of California 225 Bush 5tzeet ; Aobert N Letson San Francisco, Calif 94120 1842 Park Street - ---- - --- --------- --- - - ---- ---- -•- - - - - - - - -- - - -I - - • - -- - -- - - - - - - - - 23-010-1S 23-061-20 Huntington Beach. Calif City of Huntington Beach I Nilltsa M Bruce 92648 1837 Pine Street , - Hutttnuton Beach Calif ' I 926,E ' - - - - - --- -- ------- -- - ------------ -- '- ------ ------------------ - - I 23-020-05 23-061-21 ' 23-061-43 Hu ntir.gttn Union Hic1h School Alm A Arta tier y Larry E Alford District + 1815 Pine Street ' 1827 Pine street 1902 17th Street ' twAInqtom Beach, Calif ; Huntington Beech, Calif lkxttittigton 8aach. Calif 92648 92648 I 92948 -- ----- -- ------ --------r-- - --------------------1---------- ---------- - 23-031-03 23-%1-22 i 23-061-44 Euntington Pacific Oorp i Roger Hower ' Pamrt E Bogs 2110 lain Street ' 1936 Park Street 19841 Sea Carrym Circle I Huntington. Heach. Calif i Huntington Beech, Calif ' Huntington Beach, Calif --926" + 92648 ------------------- -t ----------- , 92648 -- - 23-040-09 i 23-061-23 i 23-062-01 Huntington Beach Cb. ; Vbtle A Dowling I Dennis Ni le Standard Oil Cb. of Calif. 11828 Park Street 400 3rd Street 2Prtqnrty 2 h �t siren ' Huntirxlbon asset., Calif i Htzttington Beacfi, Calif 92648 92648 -- --------- ------------1------------------------' -------------- - - ---- - I San Francisco, Calif I 23-061-24 23962-02 94120 + Aobert S Laughlin Walter L VanWumn I 1830 Pork Street I 1841 Park Street Hur.tirQton Beer.., Calif Huntington Beach. Calif 92648 , 92648 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 23-04( -13 ' 23-061-32 ; 23-%2-03 W B Harrell ; Robert B Waschkeit will Fowler 2110 Main Street 315 W Utica Street 1837 Park Street Huntington. Peach, Calif Huntington bench, Calif I Huntington Beach, Calif 92648 I 92648 92648 ------- - --------------- ----------------- - -- --- - ' --- ------- --- - - - - - - -- •23--061-12 i 83-061-36 + 23-062-04 NObert aftert I Barry L Waters Robert L Tarzi an 1833 Pine Street ; 1841 Pine Street I 1833 nark Stxmt 9Huntington Beech. Calif I ti►ntington Bich, Calif Huntington Beach. Calif 92648 I 92648 - --- - - - - - - -- - 23-%1-19 23-061-37 ; 23-062-05 George F Abbcnd , Peter T Yanazaki + Clarrissa Pierson 18" Panic Street + 305 Utica Street 1831 Park 5troet Huntington Beach, Calif amtingtron Beach, Calif i tttuttingtm aewh, Calif 92640 i 92648 i 92648 -- - ------- -------------- --------- -- - ------- -----,---------------- ---- - - I + , 1 I � , I I � I I I 1 � 1 I � I I I -- - - - - - - - ---- ---------} - --- ------ -- - --- -- - - I -- ' --�- ------ -------------- 80LZ6 i. 3TTMO 'ADTTRA UTw4umm ujnTTTv eRTa 9LOTT aoLp W 6uwFl - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - 1 - - - - -- - - - ---- - - - - ---- �. 969Z6 3TM NOVOR u4&JT3uH anTic .aocu4jep S9T9 � p� O h �. U09TTtM Pcx alyd TZ-£ZOrsz I - - -- - - - -- ------------'------ - ---- -- -----------r---------- ------------� I I • � I � i 099Z6 � 3TM 'Liomc9 4=xjpft - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - -- - -- - -- -- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - ' - -- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - -- - - - -I i 009 a4jnS I ' OAT- a xavm® wodow O19 XX8 UMO x%ox uMp sas I OZ-cZO-SZ - - - -------- ----- -----------------------4---- -------- --- -------- - MU Jim 'goew u 4ftm nm I ; a vl vt-x34L T£L6T J PTt1HQ I I LT-£Z0�'SZ - -- - - -- - -- -- -------- - --------------------------- ------------------ - I ' LT-tZO"SZ 1 9t9Z6 ;TTwO u AxPurF] i 86AZ6 awI 2em164TW Z8OTZ 3TM goew uD46uT4un � wRv t t tM3N d P29LoTd OP ' and OWOPTsazd ZU9 1 ' UWM SaLlor tssqTluDA 3 304ad LO-S£0'SZ ST-£ZO--SZ i - - - ------ ------------ -------- - --- • - - - - - - - - -,------------------ ----- TS9Z6 ' 3TTWO 143s 8 Qu',6v7 *WN RsOw IqTV 6SZ£ UPwe TT62TA ' STB06 ' 90-S£0-SZ i 3TM 140e8 bwl 1 - - - - - -- - - - -- - --,- - --- -- ---- --- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - ' 08Z v4TRS Pd smMq%xqS TT6 (Hr) Z961 'S xaqO430 i OTIT3Qd UedWV 0/0 AOTTV d SRC � I ZTO£ZO'6Z I - -- - - - - -------------'----- ------------- ------r--------- ----- ---- ---- - I I ' I 1 � I 1 � I ............................................................................................................................. 23- -43 23-061-19 Larry for ZC 482-15 George F Abbond 1827 Pine eet GPA 82-8 1848 Park Street Hunti on , Calif Nov. 16, 1982 (JH) Huntington Beach, Calif 92649 92648 .............................................................................................................................. 23-061-35 = 23-061-28 23-061-32 J E Wickersham Douglas G Oldfield Robert B Waschkeit 1821 Pine Street = 1816 Park Street 315 W Utica Street Huntington Beach, Calif = Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92648 92648 = 92648 ......................................... . -- -----------........-----•-•---•••••--•..................................-..... 23-061-34 23-061-27 074-01 Patricia A Joseph John C Dailey Ho Day 1819 Pine Street 1820 Park Street Hope r Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 205 ca nue 92648 92648 H ngton Be ch, Calif 9264 ................... .................................................... . . . ....................... 23-061-21 23-061-25 23 074-02 Alma A Arterberry Margaret I Riggs �� N Gabflldon 1815 Pine Street = 1824 Park Street A20na3 1Pface \ / Huntington Beach, Calif _ Huntington Beach, Calif 928 6 92648 - 92648 23-061-45 23-061-23 23-074-03 1 .. Viola B Bird LoKzoEni Verle A Cowling 308 Springfield Ave West 18et Huntington Beach, Calif 1828 Park Street Huch, Calif 92648 _ Huntington Beach, Calif 92 92648 ............. .........................................••.................•---.................... . ... ........ 23-061-46 23- 4-04 Wilfred L Schryer 23ert S Howar J Gi iland 304 W Springfield Avenue Robert Laughlin 1831 La treet Huntington Beach, Calif 1830 Park Street Hun o Beach, Calif 92648 Huntington Beach, Calif 92648 92 ...................................................................................................................... .. ... 23-061-40 ; 23-061-22 2 74-05 James H Castle Dona L Witte 318 Springfield Avenue Roger Hosmer \ Huntigton Beach, Calif : 1836 Park Street Leo J B geman Huntington Beach, Calif 10182 ve Drive 92648 92648 HU ngton Be Calif 926 ............................................................................................................................ 23-061-41 23-074-06 2 061-42 Wallace Norris Kreag Sr Jo Mastri i 18 Outtrider Rd Dept f Vets Affa of State Calif a 1737 Lane \ Rolling Hills, Calif Robert Le n Hunt' n Beach, Calif 90274 1842 Park eet : 47 ....... . . .............................................. 23-061-30 23-074-07 John W Budd 9unti to Be h, Calif Earl R Presson 1810 Park Street _______________ ___________ 1821 Lake Street Iuntington Beach, Calif 1 ; Huntington Beach, Calif 92648 92648 ....,:,_... ............. ................................................................... ..... 2Xgton _ ...................: '3�.•62-24 ........................ . D ZC #82-15 : L oy Danie n 4 General Plan Amendment 82-8 1 $8 n t H Calif ; November 16, 1982 (JH) Hunti Beach, Calif9 : 9 8 23- 2 23-062-25 23-062-14 .............................. :• -062-25 ----.............. ...... Walte DeusenX Beulah F Stephens : John F Drake 1841 P treet e 1816 Main Street 402 Springfield Street Hun • gton ach, Calif : Huntington Beach, Calif : Huntington Beach, Calif 926 8 92648 : 92648 ................;.,__................................___..........>.........................................----............... 23/ngA ' : 23-062-16 : 2 062-30 Wier : David D Perry John Pet son 18treet : 1812 Main Street HuBeach, Calif - 1808 treet Huntington Beach, Calif Hunti Beach, Calif 92 92648 92 .. ..... . ......................... ....... 23-062- 23-062-17 : 2 -062-29 Robert L arzian Darlene Cullum : Da C Franp 1833 P treet P.O. Box 503 1834 et \ Hun ton ach, Calif = Newhall, Calif : Hunti ach, Calif 926 91322 _ 92 ........................... ................................. 23-062-OS �/ 23X 23 -37 ••.. Clarriss ierson - Anigo Peter 1831 P eet 18t 305 Utic tHunt* gton ach, Calif Huh, Calif _ Hunt' on ch, Calif 92 8 92 9 8 ' 23-062-07 23-062-19 •.••w •••••• - ••- .- 23-061-36 Paul R Dusterhoft Robert M Dunker Barry L Waters 1817 Park Street 1821 Park Street 1841 Pine Street Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92648 92648 92648 • ............................ ..• .........._............ 23-062-08 23-062-21 23-061-20 Maxine C Putnam Max L Fullmer William M Bruce 1815 Park Street 1820 Main Street : 1847 Pine Street Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif : Huntington Beach, Calif 92648 92648 92648 ................................. 23-062-09 23-062-22 2 061-12....... Stanley Ruiz Newton John Allen-an R- Hub 1811 Park Street Sandra Lee Perry = 1833 elt \ Huntington Beach, Calif 1812 Main Street Hun n Beach, Calif 92648 Huntington Beach, Calif 92648 i 23- 2-12 23-062-23 23- 61-44 ,.._.. . Eddie Og Mary E Harrell Robe E Bo 1832 Mai treet 1822 Main Street 19841 you Circle Hunti n ach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif H ton ach, Calif 926 92648 648 ............................................_._.....`.._. .......................... .. `_ .......................................... .................... . ...... . 23-074-08 = Louis M O Brien ZC #82-15 1819 Lake Street GPA #82-8 Huntington Beach, Calif Nov. 16, 1982 (JH) 92648 ..........................................=.................................. ••... . 23-074-09 23-074-16 Nina J Decker : Robert D Bolen : 1811 Lake Street 1818 Pine Street = Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92648 : 29648 ..........................................: ...................... .•-- .... 23-074-10 23-074-17 Thomas W Overton Joanna B Bravender 1807 Lake Avenue 1810 Park Street Huntington Beach, Calif = Huntington Beach, Calif 92648 29648 23-074-11 11 074-18 Robert A Montgomery Wi iam T Ne 3rd I 202 Springfield Street 1828 'n eet Huntington Beach, Calif Hunt' n Beach, Calif 92648 9 8 ----------•...... ................................•-•------ 23-074-12 : 2 74-19 Dept of Vets Affairs of Ion State of Calif 1830 P' Street Norman C McShea : Hun ngto ach, Calif .p220 E Springfield Street p dp� : 29648 •• R11116 .KJ1a G�P0�Z1Gm��GL�7ffOG __.. Huntington Beach, Calif 23- 74-20 92648 Step n 0 �chelor ------------—---—------- 1836 Street = Hunt' Beach, Calif 9 8 = 23-074-13 23->4-21 ;;.................. ........................-._. .. . . . .. William R Green : Chr oseph Taylor1806 Pine Street 184StreetHuntington Beach, Calif Hun ach, Calif 92648 926 V: .................................................... ------.....-•-•-------•----- ...................... . 23-074-14 : 23- 74-22 Doris M Ferguson RichaN J Mharphy 1810 Pine Street 1842 Pi treet Huntington Beach, Calif Huntiroo ach, Calif 92648 296 ............................................ ........................................... 074-23 David G Wondell Me 'n 0 ngton ; 1814 Pine Street P.O. 03 Huntington Beach, Calif HUnti ach, Calif 92648 296 founedTD I Y�2 Cr4}/ � �dU �� O � PuAnj4on Seap-..,� � ��CtSG 46 116 '� ClnQ,ngB your aclion,5 +aket) or) Nroo. ; N?z reQC�I-C� e'p9 "�' tl You ae fed w o 4 6, 4ke, b(ga4 ) n4ere,543 4kc-, people, ho Thalm A Publish 11-18-82 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO THE PC DENIAL OF GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE 82-8 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible on Monday the 6th day of December , 1982 . for the purpose of considering an appeal filed by Councilman Pattinson of the action taken by the Planning Commission on November 2, 1982 regarding General Plan Conformance No. 82-8. The following specific action is appealed: a finding of nonconformance with the General Plan regarding the vacation of Pine Street between Seventeenth Street and Utica Avenue, the vacation of portions of Seventeenth Street from Utica Avenue to Yorktown Avenue, and the declaration of a .314-' acre parcel near the intersection of Seventeenth Street and Yorktown Avenue as surplus. A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services Office. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said appeal Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. 92648 - (714) 536-5227 DATED November 15, 1982 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wentworth . City Clerk Publish 11-18-82 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO THE PC DENIAL OF GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE 82-8 NOTICE 15 HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible on Monday the 6th day of _ December , 1982 . for the purpose of considering an appeal filed by Councilman Pattinson of the action taken by the Planning Commission on November 2, 1982 regarding General Plan Conformance No. 82-8. The following specific action is appealed: a finding of nonconformance with the General Plan regarding the vacation of Pine Street between Seventeenth Street and Utica Avenue, the vacation of portions of Seventeenth Street from Utica Avenue to Yorktown Avenue, and the declaration of a .311- acre parcel near the intersection of Seventeenth Street and Yorktown Avenue as surplus. A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services /Office. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said appeal Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. 92648 - (714) 536-5227 DATED November 15, 1982 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wentworth ^ , City Clerk HeINTER-DEPA'R,)WENTACOMMUNICATION tI H N nNGMN!EACH60 ( To Charles W. Thompso m Fames W. Palin, Directo City Administrator, 'f Development Services Subject ZONE CHANGE NO. 8 2-15 Date November 30, 1982 "ADDITIONAL INFORMATION" AGENDA ITEM D-2 (b) Scheduled for the December 6, 1982 City Council meeting is an appeal filed by Councilman Pattinson, to the Planning Commission's denial of Zone Change No. 82-15, a request by the City to change the zoning on property located north of Utica Avenue between 17th and Lake Streets from Rl-O (Low Density Residential District combined with oil production) and Rl-O-CD (Low Density Residential District combined with oil pro,►.;.., ducti6n, Civic District) to R2-O-PD-CD (Medium Density Residential District combined with oil production,- -planned development suffix and within Civic District. After denying .Zone Change No. 82-15 on November 2, 1982, the Planning Commission directed staff to prepare a General Plan amendment redesig- nating the subject property from Medium Density Residential to Low Density Residential. This information was inadvertently omitted from the "Request for Council Action" dated November 18, 1982, and should be brought to the attention of the City Council prior to their review and subsequent action on Zone Change No. 82-15 on December 6, 1982. JWP:SMS:dw Attachments: 1. Area Map 2. November 21 1982 Planning Commission Minutes Q � �. DEC 0 1 1 CITY OF HUNTINGTON S@ACH ,�► ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE �f distinguishable from its effect on the public generally if a "significant segment" of the public will be affected "in sub- stantially the same manner" as the business. Where the facts show only that a "great many" businesses will be affected, it has not been shown that a "significant segment" of the public generally will be affected. Where the employer is one of the six largest businesses in the jurisdiction, and where different hazardous wastes will be regulated differently, it has not been shown that the employer will be affected "in substantially the same manner" as most or all other businesses by the proposed ordinance. Letter to Hal Bernson City Councilmember , Los Angeles , Dated January 9, 1983, File No. A-82-211 The City of Los Angeles, together with the County of Los Angeles and the State ' s Agricultural District (Museum of Science and Industry) , participates in the triumvirate which operates the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum. Two hundred thirty-six season tickets to games in the Coliseum were provided to city officials and others without charge by the Raiders pursuant to a contractual agreement with the Coliseum Commission. All decisions as to who would receive these tickets and how many seats each recipient would get were made by the Coliseum Commission staff , not by the Raiders. Consequently, the tickets are not gifts to the officials from the Raiders. Because- the City participates in the Coliseum Commission, receipt of the tickets by a city councilmember is part of the official's compensation from the City . Thus, the tickets were not gifts from the City or from the Coliseum. NOTE: For a complete reprint of the advice letter on the above matter, please see the California Register , April 1, 1983, (Supplemedt to The Daily Recorder , 1 Cal. Register 140) . Letter to Gail Hutton , City Attorney , Huntington Beach , Dated January 25, 1983, File No. A-82-210 A councilmember is sole owner of a trucking company and employs another councilmember. The councilmember/owner has an investment interest in the trucking company of over $1, 000 and the company is a source of income to both councilmembers. Neither of the officials can make, or participate in the making of , decisions which it is reasonably foreseeable will have a material financial effect on the trucking company. In addition, a customer of the company is a source of income to the councilmember/owner because , as the sole owner, income to the trucking company is income to him personally . Government Code Section 82030. Thus, the owner must also abstain from a decision if it is reasonably foreseeable that it will have a material effect on his company's customer. i 9 - XG k ZONING DM 2 .) ECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 2-6- I I ---- ---�- . 1 (!r A NOTE: Appr7fD MAHfA11 7 1 . r ` ,,y .w,3•.,•. •t E C I �, \'� O ' CIiY C911}I:IL OROIR:':'I NO 754 n. ..."XI I'll", n+• M R. AMENDED OH[s.NQ, - •nNl'.'.�11 C%11 NO "I s a 6D LEGEND' - { ]-10-lO 7.31 _ ,O 1-r.6 j r 1 1�.�` •�l l jA\ ■■!'y. - N 7-e0 r9P ' 11 (19 470 �x3�1 t o _ �f}W[reF ­'­1 5 HUNTING I �_ .1J 11 1 _sl_�1_I-1 2 20_GI NI] 2 ,, 69 1474 ��i] c_ .v:rt l,Il l.'..:r mR.0 YUr.K[ J 6-1.1 847 70 ' 1•._j Ra•or,r•.40x6ULlyRat MsrR¢r. AMEtlQEQ Q9D_NQ'9,IB-61 868 1' 'S-I1 It." _ - - // A +1��i � ( r T '�, r , >, ( �/ z r 6.7-X, 2n83 11.6.6i 876 , I.- .-'-71 n�•„ �-� tour,yp;srxut ontRlcl _ .. 0 It A L' G1 E V 0 lJ ,, �. Y 9 ,.A IJ 1 II l� 'l NI 1 �, 6)176 2071 5-7-62 900 !r 1f07 - ��t7 Iynu,r R,K Ms1R,cr r 1[r nrq NnEs;x=nv 11976 2r)94 5-21-62 ^03 12 I7s:0 -,I co...I. Bx:�xa:s ui: AMENDED By ZONE CASE' �I i�„� r.z.4 H w n; Tn7 6-4-62 907 7t I7r, (�•J x...,.., tn..n nuu `+r./� 7. 92l-7.• 2176 10-IS-82 932 • S 12 I715- Rt( lwi['0 w17m1, t•y.tr u1 S'G(NC! pStR�Ft .. 106.123,138.147,176.177,17n• n� 2+rr )/7 2153 li-J-62 9]e �. 71 -1PF19 ,.(F]1 xrlc,mcnxub ronsyl..a-.nt- 179,180,14J.200,206,2r2,237, /"n' ••9• 121;N 11!5 1-7-63 947 11 !: )� 1971, Icij u ryF +t••ra,.r n. 'I 11 950 8 4 r•, Ini, r�yy,r,u. .y�,,Sx�•1'-.r,x,.,Rh:1 21/,249,259,2P.2,288,J02,.SJ1, 68,I 211' 2-1-F,3 - 353,779,47J,505.545,66-40, 6-iu.+ ;•�•. 6-246., 9768970 P n 7 5 2nCu1 - 68-18.68-52,69-23.70-10,70-24. '•""• •'-' 1-6-64 1028 x -'S )rJD2 ( ? r4"•B'x 1.p xrx it •, . ..�y 71-18,71-52.72-IF(F!-72.161LI,72-23.73-22.7570,75 SA.7S 3B.rS-30,753E,1'1'A 75-2,764,7607.76-12.1,15.'6 to. `• T'•'R 10-5-64 1090 4 IS 1301 •F r^ ,- 76-16,7'8-9.sDA 75'9,�T,27.. II.-All •+. - 01-1� �^.''1 R W R,sR1F1 4^' r:24.SPA-76-4 77 17 7 9,r,n 76 A.M1 /6 6n,77,A 70 2.77-1J,77 14.70 13 •r'A1? \00.16, .17 rx �i.t- 4-5-65 1152 ,'S '-4 - 4-19 75 2054 - - - Cn C 111srx,^t —•-- ._1,„M 61[cR1r PI W —j LP A RFIELD i (--___J L —� - $�.,,! >f2; s 7-,B 00A1 - i-i6 r0iir r 1 , _ t _J 1__--- AVE 1 L 1 .,RA-O�R,I 19CI 111 o -Mi— MI R2'; R 2 R5 I ,[:WYP, A,1,48'4:.Fy�Q_ C2 TO Qa 0 RA 0;'" R2 `.` R UHl�'•3 v 7x 4. .i R 2 j` 7 ) R2- I C4; R2 • - - R2 i7 R2 s M 1 I R2 �I4 ,� Nf Q' I bLc 7�'A7i srEclllr, _ -2 rL�. �_"'I rLAN(as7F1c711. J _.� L_'_ ,>0'7' =az C,At _ AVE. - if - - r '24.1 :4 R2 �R4 I^ R2 --R2 L_l'' - - jRc.O PD o o 1 ( .9 ^f`+AI+ : C2-0-CD �: 1 1 N I Rl / I Rl �' I t' I •n .R y i <^ i R 2 ;'`i;l _.r�`sr RI I RI o u `, i R2 R2 R2 f R 5-0-CD ! R2-0-fr R 2 1i CD N q I I •r'F ;4 0 �. :,,, -'CD I - N N o � s R3 11 rssF.3l i Q.rid 7+2 i C'4, C2-p . I.1 �J 7sn I •A)RY TO" ,u,•sY:,•t --�11 ■ �..__ .—._..T AVE _ 1,a-M-001.3 • 11�.1, L^ N -CQ�Y.. I xs.;as R2-0 I►�R? i•0 ---, i >noo, C F-C lr:.-. 1Y'ERI CF-E-CD �,���- R2-0-CDBn1I- r.--c_ IRA l 1 r R2 C2 -;C N o' o i 4 I cD_oJ��jl R2-0` I R2 �i R2 r CF-E � -CD-0 1 YIHa1 ! I 1 I o Of cr ----- I E. O IcD of 0 I --- - O 1 . sac R4 ,a IF� s -=- - --- - - — 1,�4.,,• .AT i ((�0 i-o1-0- AICF-�R RI RI RI RI RI R2' -CD-O o; o CD O. 1Oj j f Er RID ; = I - — 1 =DD_°I� R2 C 4 I 51 H'N�t Ik 1.0 �CI IC' L ,, - - —IUD C1� N� ,� +,yr•' e'- o _ � LoII ;; r' i 0 0 0 G 0 a ¢ nl a RI RI RI RI R( R2 -0 R661 T f I -1e RI-0 \ �n J — I ILI 01 I-01 0 0 O Rg-0 I173 0 ,R10;- - RI AVE- ADAMS i 00 ROVED ON 11-16'82 MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION Council Chambers - Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 2 , 1982 - 7 : 00 PM COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Higgins, Livengood, Winchell , Paone, Porter, Schumacher, Mir.jahangir CON NT CALENDAR: Commissi ner Porter requested that Item A-2 , Extension of Time on Tentative act 10910 and Conditional Use Permit No. 80-4 , be pulled for separate onsidcration. ON MOTION BY WIN ELL AND SECOND BY SCHUMACHER THE REMAINDER OF THE �+ CONSENT CALENDAR, NSISTING OF THE MINUTES OF ViE REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 19 , 1982, ND EXTENSION OF TIME ON CONDITIONAL USE PER- MIT NO. 81-28 , WAS APP VED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Higgins, Winchell, Paone, Porter, Schumacher, Mirjahangir NOES : None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Live good ON MOTION BY PORTER AND SECOND BY MIR ANGIR THE REQUEST FOR EX- TENSION OF TIME ON TENTATIVE TRACT 10910 ND CONDITIONAL USE PER- MIT NO. 80-4 WAS CONTINUED FOR THE PURPOSE F REVIEWING THE SITE PLAN AS IT RELATES RESIDENTIAL AREAS , TO THE EETING OF KOVEMBER. 16 , 1982 , BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES : Higgins, Livengood, Porter, Schumacher, M• jahangir NOES : Winchell, Paone .ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS : GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE NO. 82-8/ZONE CHANGE NO. 32-15/NEGATI:'E DECLARATION NO. 82-40 (Continued from 10-19-82) Initiated by the City of Huntington Beach A request to find the zone change in conformance with the General , a "OD' II.B. Planning Commission ' November 2, 1982 Page 2 , Plan and a request to change the zoning from Rl-O &hd R1-O=CD to R2-O-PD-CD at property located north of Utica -Avenue 1?etween 1.7th and Lake Streets. ' Secretary Palin gave a brief presentation on the historical back- ground of the area. fie stated that original studies were conducted to analyze intensity levels resulting in the proposed zone change request. A compromise was agreed to when an impasse occurred in terms of the old railroad right-of-way, which resulted in some' trade-offs. It was envisioned that the City would declare a portion. . of the property as surplus on both sides of Pine Street. Access was discussed to come from Lake Street with a possible secondary access coming off of 17th Street. At this time the possibility of a •com- munity center was discussed. However, at no time was there a dis- cussion of providing access off of Utica. The Secretary further re- minded the Commissioners that any proposed project would require the filing of appropriate applications - this would consequently re- quire notices to be sent to residents within 300 feet of the proposed project. Commissioners briefly discussed parking on 17th .Street. Les Evans, City Engineer, gave a synopsis *of the traffic report which was conducted by Public Works Department. Commissioner •Porter asked if it was considered to widen Utica. Mr. Evans stated that it would not be feasible. Commissioner Porter questioned setbacks in terms of vacation at the north end of 17th Street. Secretary Palin •sug- '"' gested that if the Planning Commission was concerned, it could sug- gest that a qualified suffix be attached to the zone. Chairman Paone opened the public hearing. The following persons spoke against the proposed General Plan Confor- mance and ZonQ Change: Bob Bolman George Abon Faye Ogden John Pederson William Rodell Rick Murphy Verl Cowling Mr. Gusterhouse E. Rutherd Esther Danielson Craig Garris Bob Washguy Some issues raised by public testimony included complaints with the notification policy. Commissioners explained that even if residents were not close enough to be notified by ,mail, that public notices do appear in the Huntington Beach Independent. Also questioned was the issue of circulation, with possible heavy traffic going through residential streets that are populated with children. Complaints were also registered against the accuracy of the staff report. Residents also felt that the police cars would have trouble exiting from the station. Traffic volume and circulation were also cit'0d. Along with the public testimony, a petition was submitted voicing =•' the concerns against the proposed zone change and numerous letters against the proposal were entered into the record. H.B. Planning Commission November 2, 1982 Page 3 The public hearing was closed. Commission discussion co;itinued with a discussion on density, vacation of streets, traffic circulation, etc. A motion was made by Livengood and seconded by, Winchell to- continue the General Plan Conformance to the meeting of December 7th, at which time a corrected traffic report would be submitted along with various information relative to the impact on the environment. After con- siderable discussion the maker and second withdrew their. motion. A MOTION WAS MADE BY PORTER AND SECONDED BY SCHUMACHER TO FIND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE NO. 82-8 NOT IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN AND NOT IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE GOVERNMENT CODE BECAUSE OF THE LACK' OF ADEQUATE INFORMATION AND OF SUFFICIENT DEFINITION OF THE PURPOSE AND INTENT OF THE USE PROPOSED FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THE MOTION PASSED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Higgins, Livengood, Winchell, Porter, Schumacher, Mirjahangir NOES: Paone ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Some additional comments were made relating to the above motion. Com- missioner Schumacher felt that a senior center next to a high school did not seem compatible, nor would there be adequate buffer. Tom + Tincher also added some comments relating to the consolidation of par- cels in the area. ON MOTION BY PORTER AND SECOND BY HIGGINS, NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 82-40 WAS APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Higgins, Livengood, Winchell, Paone, Porter, Mirjahangir NOES: Schumacher ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ON MOTION BY PORTER AND SECOND BY WINCHELL ZONE ,CHANGE NO.. 82-15 WAS DENIED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE, AND FOR- WARDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDING DENIAL.- FINDINGS: 1. The proposed density is not compatible with surrounding residential area. 2. The proposed "PD" suffix would only compound an existing parking problem in the area. AYES: Livengood, Winchell, Paone, Porter, Schumacher,, Mirjahangir NOES:. Higgins ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ON MOTION BY PORTER AND SECOND BY WINCHELL STAFF WAS -DIRECTED TO PRE- PARE A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT REDESIGNATING THE PROPERTY TO LOW DENSITY Q„fRESIDENTIAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: H.B. Planning Comm—sion November 2, 1982 Page 4 .. AYES: Livengood, Winchell, Paone, Porter, Schumacher, Mirjahangir NOES: Higgins ` ABSENT: None " ABSTAIN: None NDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 82-26 A licant: Atlantic Richfield Company A re est to permit the conversion of an existing service station, locate at the southwest corner of Heil and Goldenwest, into a con- venience market combined with gasoline sales. Jim Barnes stated that a su ested condition was inadvertently omitted from the staff report that if the Planning Commission chooses to approve the pro- ject they wo d ". . . have the right to rescind the application in. the event of a violation of applicable zoning laws" . The public hearin was opened. Sam Glick, speaking for the appli- cant, stated that agreed with the staff recommendations and asked for approval o the project. Commissioners asked if this was proposed to be a 24 h r operation. Mr. Glick stated that it would be open 24 hours. Speaking against approval the project were Dottie Jones and Bob McCullum. Both cited probl s occuring at the present time and were ... totally against a 24-hour ope tion. The public hearing was closed. " Commissioner Livengood questione if the project met the require- ments of the service station stan rds. Staff stated that sine this was a request for conversion t t service stations standards were non-applicable. Since the main bjection to the conversion was the fact that it is proposed to op ate "around the clock" , Com- missioner Schumacher recommended that co ditions be attached to the application limiting the hours of operati Mr. Glick responded that the idea of the "AM/PM Market" was to ive. shoppers the con- venience of being able to shop any time and rther stated that the hours of operation were non-negotiable. ON MOTION BY PORTER AND SECOND BY LIVENGOOD COND IORAL USE PERMIT NO. 82-26 WAS DENIED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS, THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1. The proposed use would be materially detrimental to th public health, welfare and safety of persons residing in the n ' gh- • borhood. 2. The proposed use is not compatible with the surrounding re— sidential area. �•• tJ . AYES: Livengood, Winchell, Paone, Porter, Schumacher; Mirjahang-ii NOES: Higgins ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ` IN THE Superior Court OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA In and for the County of Orange CITY OF H U N T I N G T O N BEACH PROOF OF PUBLICATION CITY CLERK PUBLIC HEARING State of California ) County of Orange )'s' A P R I L L. ELLIOTT NoncE oar Pue11c aEAltarc APPEAL 70 TBE PC DIDGAL OF That I am and at all times herein mentioned was a citizen of ZONE CASE82.16 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a the United States,over the age of twenty-one years,and that I public heari will b Cky Hbeld by the�ty am not a party to,nor interested in the above entitled matter; Couaeil that I am the principal clerk of the printer of the 1e,Huntington C��r tttha Cme 7:3 P P P ter,Hustm�tow Beach,at the boar of 7:3C , P.M.,or m coon thereafter as paimble on Monday,the ft day of December,198$ H U N T I N G T O N BEACH I N D. REVIEW for the purpose of considering an aPw•l riled by C uncilmeo Pattimoo to the a newspaper of general circulation,published in the City of deoW ofroaaro9�9 M oafed north the zoning l of Utica Avenue, 17th and Lake Street from RI-0(Low H U N T I N G T O N BEACH Dem ity Reaideatiai combimad with ail County of Orange and which newspaper is published for the and RI.O-CD(Low Dimsky tial ombmsd with oil Production disemination of local news and intelligence of a general charac- within Chic Diatrice) to RI -PD-CD ter, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had (Medium Density Residential District comb Planned and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, Dove1 p ned n3ufraa th oil in Civic Die- and which newspaper has been established, printed and pub- trictl.4 C��'ttyy Coaoeil will aka onaider lished at regular intervals in the said County of Orange for a =a-;m Declaratao No.8240 in con- eriod exceeding one year; that the notice, of which the 100m� n f Zoee Cam e to P g Y legal description is ae file is the De- annexed is a printed copy, has been published in the regular partmentof Development 9erviom. to and entire issue of said newspaper,and not in any supplement attend &W b"SW ex� thereof,on the following dates,to wit: ooppm. r.oea lbr r atamat mid 04 sail ne.0"Deco U. No.82 fib.farther informatme may be obtmaW from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach,CA 92M - 27. NOV. 189 1982 DATTEDED November DATED 18,1982 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Alicia M.Wentworth City Clerk Pub.Nov.l&1982 Hunt.Beach Ind Rev.930M I certify(or declare)under penalty of perjury that the forego- ing is true and correct. GARDEN GROVE Datedat................................................ 19th NOV. 82 California, his ........day of ..........19........ f c/.0...6:4f ................... Signature ,N) Form No.POP 92082 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION t Date November 18, 1982 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator 4 Prepared by: James W. Palin, Director, Development ServicesA o Subject: APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. 82-15 Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Transmitted for your consideration is an appeal to the Planning Commis- sion' s denial of Zone Change No. 82-15, a request to change the zoning on property located north of Utica Avenue, between 17th Street and Lake Street from Rl-O and R1-O-CD to R2-0-PD-CD, Medium Density Resi- dential District combined with oil production, within the Civic Dis- trict and having a planned development suffix. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council uphold the Commission' s denial- of- Zone Change No. 82-15. -- -- The Planningstaff reconTended to the Planning Commission approval of a change g PP g of zone on the subject property from R1-0 and Rl-O-CD to R2-0-CD-PD. The City Administration has previously recommended a change of zone to conform to the City' s General Plan and to allow this area to be cleaned up for productive use. ANALYSIS: Appellant: Councilman Pattinson Applicant: initiated by the Department of Development Services Location: Subject property is located north of Utica Avenue between Seventeenth and Lake Streets. Request: To permit a change of zone on the subject property from R1-0 (Low Density Residential District combined with Oil Production) and R1-O-CD (Low Density Residen- tial combined with Oil Production/Civic District) to R2-0-CD-PD (Medium Density Residential District com- bined with Oil Production/Civic District and having a Planned Development suffix) . PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION OF NOVEMBER 2, 1982 : ON MOTION BY PORTER AND SECOND BY WINCHELL ZONE CHANGE NO. 82-15 WAS DENIED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: PIO 4/81 ZC 82-15 November 18 , 1982 Page 2 AYES: Livengood, Winchell, Paone, Porter, Schumacher, Mirjahangir NOES: Higgins, ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None DISCUSSION: Zone Change No. 82-15 is a request initiated by the Department of De- velopment Services to change the zoning on property located north of Utica Avenue between 17th and Lake Streets from Rl-O-CD and Rl-O to R2-0-CD-PD, Medium Density Residential combined with oil production, Civic District and having a planned development suffix. This zone change was initiated by the Department of Development Services as part of an agreement between the City and the Huntington Beach Company whereby a .84 acre parcel of land owned by the Huntington Beach Company, located near the northeast corner of Main Street and Utica Avenue would be exchanged for a parcel of land located south of Yorktown Avenue ap- proximately 140 feet west of Lake Street to accommodate future develop- ment of a community center located on the northeast corner of Utica Avenue and Main Street. In addition to this exchange, the Huntington Beach Company has requested that Pine Street between 17th and Utica and a portion of 17th Street be vacated. Zone Change No. 82-15 is also being requested by the Department of Development Services to bring the subject property into conformance with the current General Plan designation. The current zoning on the subject property is Rl-O and Rl-O-CD, while the General Plan designation is currently medium density residential. Approval of Zone Change No. 82-15 would bring the zoning designation into conformance with the General Plan. In reviewing Zone Change No. 82-15, the Commission had a number of concerns regarding a change of zone on the subject property to R2-0- CD-PD. These concerns included the traffic study submitted by the Public Works Department, the location of the senior center in relation to the high school located across Main Street to the west, the proposed increase in density and the compatibility of a future condominium pro- ject with surrounding single family residential development. The Commission also was concerned about placing "planned development suf- fix" on the subject property and felt that this would compound an existing parking problem within the area. It was noted by the Com- mission that the compatibility of a future senior center with the high school was in question. The Commission was also concerned with the compatibility of the existing single family dwellings with a pos- sible future condominium development on the subject site, and felt that the additional traffic generated by this development would have a negative effect on the surrounding residential properties. The Commission also noted that the traffic study prepared by the Public Works Department was inadequate and that additional questions regard- ing traffic within the area remain unanswered. Based on these argu- ments, the Commission denied Zone Change No. 82-15 with the following findings:f 0 w ZC 82-15 November 18, 1982 Page 3 FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1. The proposed density is not compatible with surrounding residential area. 2. The proposed "Pt)" suffix. would only compound an existing parking problem in the area. Staff analysis of Zone Change No. 82-15 indicates that the addition of the "planned development" suffix to the subject property would maximize development control on future projects proposed for this property. The addition of the "planned development" suffix to the subject property would require all proposed projects to conform to the development standards contained within the "Planned Residential De- velopment" standards (Article 936, HBOC) which include density stan- dards, vehicle access requirements, open space, circulation, setbacks and landscaping requirements. The "Planned Development" standards would also require the developer to submit, for review by the Planning Commission, a conditional use permit application and tentative tract map. This process includes the requirement that a public hearing be held at which time residents within the community may voice their opinions regarding the proposed development. The staff also indicated to the Planning Commission on November 2, 1982, that the addition of the "planned development" suffix would allow the City better control over points of access to the future development, limiting circulation from the project to the south on to Park and Pine Streets. Much of the traffic from the future Planned Residential De- velopment could be directed toward Lake Street or Yorktown Avenue with- out impacting the existing single family dwellings located to the south of the subject property. Based on these arguments, the Planning staff recommended approval of Zone Change No. 82-15, a change of zone from R1-O and R1-O-CD to R2-0-CD-PD. The Department of Development Services received approximately 50 letters of opposition to Zone Change No. 82-15. Copies of these letters are on file with the City Clerk. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Development Services posted draft Negative Declaration No. 82-40 for 10 days, and no comments either verbal or written were received. The staff in its initial study of the project has recom- mended that a negative declaration be issued for Zone Change No. 82-15. Prior to any action on Zone Change No. 82-15, it is necessary for the City Council to act on Negative Declaration No. 82-40. ON MOTION BY PORTER AND SECOND BY HIGGINS, NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 82-40 WAS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON NOVEMBER 2, 1982, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: 3 ZC 82-15 November 18, 1982 Page 4 AYES: Higgins, Livengood, Winchell, Paone, Porter, Mirjahangir NOES: Schumacher ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The City Council may consider approving Zone Change No. 82-15 changing the zoning on the subject property from Rl-0 and R1-O-CD to R2-O-CD-PD. FUNDING SOURCE: Not applicable. SUPPORTING INFORMATION: 1. Letter from appellant 2. Area Map 3. Staff Report dated November 2, 1982 4. Negative Declaration No. 82-40 5. Ordinance JWP:SMS:jlm 'IQV +� CITY OF HUNTIIQe BEACH , CITY COUNCIL COMM�I TION • • uhixr(.iOH/FACFt J_ �� To Alicia Wentworth# FROM ouncilman Pattinson City Clerk SUBJECT APPEAL TO DENY CONFORMANCE DATE November 5, 1982 WITH GENERAL PLAN 82-8 & ZONE CHANGE NO. 82-15 This communication will serve as written notice of my appeal to the denial of Zone Change No. 82-15 and Conformance with General Plan No. 82-8. I feel that the proposed rezoning and street vacations are consistent with the General Plan and with the purposes established for the Yorktown-Lake Redevelopment Project. RP:lp r PLANNING ZONING DO t SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 2-6- 11 0- -- - -- SCPLC IN ET REST ADOPTED MARCH 7,1960 NOTE: CITY OF ALL DIND 0roT ARE IN FEET AY CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO 754 ANY ZONE ADJOHNIG ANY RIGHT a w 1SR dTENDED 10 txiExD TO THE CENTER AMENDED RO O NO. AMENDED ORD NO. ' BOCA RIGHT of WAY 6-20-60 773 2-21-66 1186 LEGEN5: 7.18-60 781 10-3.Be 1256 O SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT HUNTINGTON BEACH E-7-60 :4 ,-17-69 1527 R2 Tw0 FAMILY RESIDENCE NALD15 DISTRICT 2-20-61 817 217-69 1479 FQ- COMMUNITT FACILITIES IEDUCATIOAALI DISTRICT E-S-GI 844 Q. 69 1527 Rs OFFICE-PROFE,SroNAL dSTRKT 6-19-'1 847 10-19-70 I606 RA RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AMENDED—76 Mn.NM 9-18-61 868 3-15.71 1639 MI LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ;_g 6 2071 5-21-62 goo 903 I7 -876 72 1760 1 COMMUNITY BUSINESSTDISTRICT AMENDED ORD NO 8-I6-l6 2107 6-4-82 907 7-17.72 1762 0 HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL AMENDED 9Y ZONE CASE: 1a0.7B 2326' R3 LIMITED MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT 9a0-ro 239I 9.21-76 21?6 10-I5-62 932 9-5-72 1775 IDS,123,138,147,176,177,178, 3-5•e1 24r7 I-3-77 2153 12_3-62 938 I2.17-73 1889 © NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL 7-6-BI 2494 12-6=l6 2135 MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 24 180,,269 282.28e 212,231. 4-re 77 2171 2. .3 950 10 4-73 1999 Tg COMMUNITr FACILITIES.CIVIC)DIET RICT O 294,248,269,282,288,302,331, 2-4-63 950 8-4-75 I999 RE37 6-6:/ 21B0 SETBACK LINE 333.379,473,505.595,66-40, 6-20-77 18z 6-29.63 9768978 a-4-75 2000 68•I8,68.52,69-23,70-10.70-28, 11-I3-TG z1TP 1-6-64 :ooze S.4-75 2002 —OO COMBINED WITH OIL PR000CTION 71-18,71-32,72-I6(F).72-I61L1,72-23,73.22,73-20,75.3A.75-3B,75.3D.75-3E,PPA 75-2.76.4,76-07,78-12,7•.,-15,76-I8,q�19', 2i o JO-S-64 1090 8-4-75 2003 -DI M PBECEE ALAN OF STREET A IC++ 76-16.76-8.PPA75-8.76-22.76-24,PPA-76-4,77-1,77-8,PrA-76-8,PPA-76-6D,77-3"A;79-2.77-13.7 r-19.7B-13,PPA79-3,80•I6, --m 22%, 4.3-BS 1132 9-23-75 2004 -CD CIVIC DISTRICT ---amo3N SPECIFIC PL41 y-7' 4-19-76 2054 6-7-76 p062 6-7-76 206] 6.7-76 2070 1 1 AVE. 34 a Bo-6• —J1IGARFIELD I 1 I (_ .�-T/ _ _ _ r�eo3o r— --- r RA-0 R CI - J s R2, y'c ka1 ID S I Tz s3o r/•... ' i - :C I o M I R 58 T 0 RA-0 R2 ;:.::,� C,W--TAE:.P.. o Q 1 RA-Om <'• IR2 Fr: H LINES_V TR 9]000 R2 i .A R2 C4! ' I R2 - `' ro �g R R2 � I . . R2e a o '•.+ OLC T!+vJN^PEC9'I 3 R2 $ PLANIDISTRICT I.) Soo 1x -z6AIx- CLAY r--xarc-� AVE C2-O n3 ]54 �/R Si: R3 2 4' o - R3 cz: 4 R R2 R2-0-PD �^ �.�.Pp o 2D R2 N LINE TR 3950 D R 2 •�3a•, R� o 0 1 - zso AVE. C2-0-CD D C2-O "fi:`r�pr� c CLLSER eN0 R j RAND CP R 2 1C2' x,Nz•aro„D �, RI IOs e,•s,'sR•r s e,•aP•3.'E RI �., • �y.7q•56— � I NILLIANS AVE fA E AL h'_.,,•� Q t A E TR 3950 254 I Y R5-0 ' , -, - N 0 � � R2 330{. R L126� xMM C2-0-CD ' Q g R3 1II'7II� ag o-E I w L. .R2 Ci4>D L -250- YORNTOWN -- - AVE. uP•a,'3a•E I 4131 '� G g c2 j R ca ,oGO! C F-C 2 ORz . aID F s R2-0 x9D CF-E-CDCD g' SO N'ICHIiA----aVE 'RA R2 C 2 (:J:iTi.I..1 L:18':i:':=JiPJH%:iG`i 3•:I.:"e.l � � 1 -CF-E CD' -CD-0 G �� o o cD-o I R2-0 R2 R2 JAY ER wCF-E �, Q -CD-O VENICLIt IS D -CD-O o R4 1 TPA. .1'M-w. 37P. Q�0 a -CD-0 TOR SaM'wY 1984-74WE P.Dr UIKA IPx1 -- ZGOG PPVPTaP•E 4M 'P a -CD-01 R2-0 R2-0 1 D-O �N�� r^ I R CF-R RI RI RI RI RI R2 -CD-0 'O'_T0 .T%F o 0 a r .A4•A I O O n I N N • C� 0 //�1R+O .'4 ~ CD-Q /O'Y Ax SAxTEM R2 a C 1 .{ ;••S�/, SPRINGFILLD S .1 IC L N l o o T �'ti''�.` vJ• 'I,a S• O �� O I 1 aLInWiDN 1 D I•i �d 2� w _ N N O O e•.• 'Ira T °A. K � L 1 -0 I O: D: 50 1 U y� •r N 2 RI RI RI RI RI R2 -0 ROCHFSTER ¢ AVE R30 R3 w K.'' ``��. ?•L I Q�I m //R1.p 144' 90 4I x aL 1 O `C AR • 1R .} •�,� RI-O +� a LLB-1��01 O O a-0 D-O R2 . � o RI.O r1�1 r1a RI ADAMS I ; AVE I ZO NEP C#-�NN6F- �to' 82-l E huntington beach development services department STAFF _REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Development Services DATE: November 2, 1982 SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE NO. 82-15/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 82-40 (Continued from October 19, 1982 meeting) Zone Change No. 82-15 is a request by the City of Huntington Beach to change the zoning on property located north of Utica Avenue, be- tween 17th and Lake Streets from Rl-O and Rl-O-CD to R2-0-CD (Medium Density Residential District combined with oil production and within the Civic District) . At the October 19, 1982 Planning Commission meeting, the staff re- recommended that Zone Change No. 82-15 be continued to the Novem- ber 2, 1982 Planning Commission meeting to allow for the preparation of a new ordinance adding the "Planned Development" suffix to the proposed zone change. The two week continuance was also requested by staff to allow sufficient time for public notification of the proposed zone change. The staff determined that the addition of a "Planned Development" suffix to the proposed zone change will maximize control by the City over future development of the subject property. Development on the site will be required to conform with standards in Article 936 of the Ordinance Code which were established to provide maximum use of aesthetically pleasing architecture, landscaping and site design to promote a better living environment. Density, setbacks, open space, on-site circulation and points of access to the development can be controlled through the development process required in Article 936. This process would include the submittal of a condi- tional use permit and tentative tract map by the applicant for any "planned development" project on the site. The process would also include public notification and a public hearing at which time resi- dents within the community could voice their opinions regarding the proposed development. Based on the above information and the analysis contained within the attached staff report, the staff recommends that the Planning Com- mission approve a change of zone on the subject property from Rl-O and Rl-O-CD to R2-0-CD-PD ATTACHMENTS : 1. Staff report dated October 19, 1982 2. Ordinance dS• lm A-F M-23A f i r\ huntington beach development services department STAff wRIpa TO: Planning Commission FROM: Department of Development Services ,. DATE: October 19., 1982 • ZONE CHANGE NO. 82-15/NEGATIVE DECLARATION No. 82-40 APPLICANT: Initiated by the City DATE ACCEPTED: of Huntington Beach October 4, 1982 REQUEST: To change the zoning from R1-O (Low Density Residen- MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE tial combined with Oil December 4, . 1982 Production) and Rl-O-CD (Low Density Residential ZONING: • combined with Oil Produc- tion, Civic District) to R2-0-CD (Medium.Density Residential combined GENERAL PLAN. DESIGNATION : with Oil Production, Civ- ic District) LOCATION: Subject property is located EXISTING USE: north of Utica Avenue be- tween 11th and Lake Streets. Vacant/Temporary Parking Lot/Oil Operations ACREAGE: 9 . ± acres. 1.0 SUGGESTED ACTION: x' Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue Zone Change No. 82-15 to the November 2, 1982 Planning . Commission to allow for the preparation of a new ordinance changing the zoning on the prop- erty to R2-0-PD-CD and to allow for additional legal advertising. 2. 0 GENERAL INFORMATION: Zone Change No.. 82-15 is a request by the City of Huntington Beach to change the zoning on property located north of Utica Avenue be- tween Seventeenth and Lake Streets from Rl-O (Low Density Residen- tial combined with Oil Production) and Rl-O-CD (Low Density Resi- dential combined with Oil Production/Civic District) to R2-O-CD (Medium Density Residential combined with Oil Production, Civic District) . ACM A-FM-E3A ZC 82-15/ND 82-40 October 19, 1982 Page 2 3 . 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Development Services posted draft Negative Declara- tion No. 82-40 for 10 days and no comments, .either verbal or written, were received. The staff in its initial study of the pro- ject has recommended that a negative declaration be issued for Zone. Change 82-15. Prior to any action on Zone Change No. 82-15, it is necessary for the Planning Commission to act on Negative Declaration No. 82-40. 4. 0 GENERAL PLAN, ZONING, AND SURROUNDING LAND USES: Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN: Medium Density Residential ZONE: R1-O and Rl-O-CD LAND USE: Vacant, Temporary Parking Lot, and Oil Pro- duction North of Subject Property: (Across Yorktown Avenue) " GENERAL PLAN: Medium Density Residential ZONE: R2-O-PD-CD LAND USE: Vacant South of Subject Property: (Across Utica Avenue) GENERAL .PLAN: Low Density Residential ZONE: R1 and R2 LAND USE: Exisitng Single-Family Dwellings and Apartments West -of -Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN: Public Use ZONE: CF-C LAND USE: Civic Center Facility East of Subject Property: (Across Lake Street) GENERAL PLAN: Medium Density Resdiential ZONE: Old Town Specific Plan LAND USE: Machine Shop, Vacant, and Oil Production 5. 0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: Zone Change No. 82-15 is a request by the City of Huntington Beach to change the zoning on property located north of Utica Avenue be- tween Seventeenth Street and Lake Street from Rl-O (Low Density Residential District combined with Oil Production) and Rl-O-CD (Low Density Residential District combined with Oil Production/Civic District) to R2-O-CD (Medium Density Residential District combined with Oil Production/Civic District) . Zone Change No. 82-15 is being requested by the City of Huntington Beach as part of an agreement between the City and the Huntington Beach Company whereby a .84 acre parcel of land owned by the Huntington Beach Company, located near V ZC 82-15/ND 82-40 October 19, 1982 Page 3 the northeast corner of Main Street and Utica Avenue, will be ex- changed for a ..parcel of land located south of Yorktown Avenue approxi- mately 140 feet west of Lake Street to accommodate future develop- ment of a community center located on the northeast corner of Utica Avenue and Main Street. In addition to this exchange, the Hunting- ton Beach Company has requested that Pine Street between Seventeenth and Utica and a portion of Seventeenth Street be vacated. ' Zone Change No. 82-15 is .also being requested by the City of Hunt- ington Beach to bring the subject property into conformance with the current General Plan designation. The current zoning designation is Rl-O and Rl-O-CD, while the General Plan designation is currently shown on the Land Use Map as medium density residential . Approval of Zone Change No. 82-15 from Rl-0 and Rl-O-CD to R2-0-CD would bring the zoning designation into conformance with the General Plan. In reviewing Zone Change No. 82-15 the staff has identified "the compatibility of the proposed zone change to R2-O-CD with surrounding land uses" as a major issue. As indicated in Section 4 . 0 of this report, the surrounding zoning designations include R2-0-PD-CD to the north (across Yorktown Avenue) , Oldtown Specific Plan to the east (across Lake Street) , CF-C to the west, and R1 and R2 located to the south (across Utica Avenue) . It is the staff' s opinion that a change of zone to R2-O-CD would be compatible with the surrounding land uses, which are generally medium density with the exception of the Civic Center site and the existing single-family dwellings loc- ated to the south of the subject property across Utica Avenue. The property located to the east of the subject property, across Lake Street, is currently vacant; however, this property is designated on the General Plan as medium density residential and should be com- patible with the proposed R2-O-CD zoning. Impacts on surrounding properties resulting from future development of the subject site may include additional traffic flow onto Pine Street, Lake Street, and Seventeenth Street; however, this issue can be more properly addressed upon submittal of a development plan for the subject property and review of the conformance to the General Plan No. 82-8 , which is before the Planning Commission this evening. Conformance with the General Plan land use designation has also been identified by staff as a major issue regarding Zone Change No. 82-15. The current General Plan designation on the subject property is medium density residential. The current zoning designations in- clude R1-0 and R1-0-CD. A change of zone on the subject property from R1-O and R1--O-CD to R2-O-CD will correct this inconsistency and result in the zoning designation conforming with the current General Plan designation. Staff analysis of Zone Change No . 82-15 indicates that the addition of a "PD" (Planned Development) suffix to the subject property would maximize control by the City of future development on the subject property. A planned development project on the site would require the applicant to file a conditional use permit and tentative tract ap- plication with the City and would also be subject to a public hearing before the Planning Commission. A planned development on the subject property would ensure that a "secured" planned development ZC 82-15/ND 82-40 October 19, 1982 Page 4 would be constructed as opposed to an apartment complex. Traffic flow to and-From a planned development project could be controlled through the site plan review process by the Planning Commission as opposed to an apartment development. Therefore, based on the above-stated reasons, the staff recommends that Zone Change No. 82-15 be continued until the November 2, 1982 Planning Commission meet- ,.ing to allow for the preparation of a new ordinance changing the zoning to R2-O-PD-CD and to allow for legal advertising of the project. 6. 0 RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue Zone Change No. 82-15 to the November 2, 1982 Planning Commission meeting to allow for the preparation of a new ordinance changing the zoning on the subject property from R1-O and R1-O-CD to R2-0-PD-CD and to allow for additional legal advertising. If the Planning Commission chooses to approve the Zone Change as advertised to R2-0-CD, the following findings are offered: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: • 1. A change of zone from R1-O (Low Density Residential District combined with 0il Production) and R1-0-CD (Low Density Resi- dential District combined with Oil Production/Civic District) to R2-O-CD (Medium Density Residential combined with Oil Pro- duction/Civic District) is consistent with the General Plan designation which is currently medium density residential . 2. The proposed zone change is compatible with surrounding land uses which include properties zoned and General Planned medium density residential, property used as a Civic Center facility, vacant land, and existing single-family dwellings located south of the subject site across Utica Avenue. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Area Map 2. Ordinance 3 .' Negative Declaration No. 82-40 JWP:SMS:df �� 1 . t } + CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION '+ 14UNTINGTON BFACH y •8t[Ak To Michael Strange From ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES f" w Assistant Planner SECTION Subject NEGATIVE DECLARATION Date October 15, 1982 1 �. N0. 82-40 t � Applicant: City of Huntington Beach Reauest: Change of zone from Rl-O-CD to R2-0-CD w Location: North of Utica, between 17th and Lake Streets Tr 4 } Background ��3 gym,,+ Based on the Staff's initial study of this project a Draft Negative Declaration was published in the local newspaper and posted in the Office of the City Clerk + 4'; for a 10-day public review period ending 10/18/82 �¢•,€;; and no comments, X the attached comments were received. �4. "r Recommendation fR% m The Environmental Resources Section recommends that the Planning Commission approve Negative Declaration No. 82—4 0 finding that the proposed project will not have a significant adverse effect on ` the environment. Mitigation Measures The attached mitigating measures will reduce potential environmental effects resulting from the project and are recommended as conditions of approval . Respectfully submitted, Aw� X_Z James R. Barnes Associate Planner JRB/dc ti-�t INFVMATION AND DATA REQUIRED FOR CONDUCTING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF A PROJECT I . If a project is subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and not exempted under any of the provisions of the Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA the City is required to conduct an initial study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment. Two (2) typed copies of the attached Environmental Information Form shall be completed and submitted to the Development Services' Department. Any other permit application, not including a Building Permit, required by the Development Services Depart- ment shall be filed concurrently with the attached form. II. The following information and data shall accompany the Environ- mental Information Form: A. A District Map (obtained in the City Clerks Office) clearly outlining the boundaries of the site. B. A site plan showing the following information: 1. North arrow. 2. Location of structures, both existing and proposed showing all dimensions and adjacent streets. 3 . Location, type and size of existing trees and shrubs.. 4 . Parking layout and means of access from adjacent streets . 5. Proposed landscaping and existing or proposed fence and/or walls . C. Photographs of the area in sufficient detail to depict existing physical conditions in the project area. • III . Information to assist in filling out the Environmental Information Form may be obtained at the front counter in the Development Services Department. IV. A $115 . 00 Administrative Processing' Fee shall be submitted along with the Environmental Information Form. � �..Q►��a► f�hrlf`o9 rz►�h� o r� �Ue.. �N -f/•or_ L1ap?'. �����.e�-o�carne�i7;'4� CITY OF HUNTINGTON P^ ri DEVELOPMENT SERVICk jEPARTMENT P.O.Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA.92648 M%11V.111%at U N Tel: (714)516-5271 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM Fee - $1 5.00 k FOR CITY USE ONLY City of Huntington Beach Date f -Annlicant/Authorized Agent Received: 10/4/82 Project ND 82-40 Number: 2000 Main Street Department of Origin: Mailing Address Development Services j tyy M �R 536-5271 Other Applications or ,,,., Telephone Permit Numbers : Zone Change NO. 82--15 r , City of Huntington Beach Pronerty (honer 2000 Main Street bailing Address/Telephone 1. 0 Project Information (please attach Plot Plan and submit photographs of subject property) 1. 1 Nature of Project: Give complete description of the proposed project. A change of zone from R1-0 (Low Density Residential) and R1-O-CD (Low Density Residential District combined with oil pro- • duction and within Civic District) to R2-0-CD (Medium Density Residential District combined with oil production and within Civic' District) . 1 . 2 Location of Project: (Address, nearest street intersections) Nbrth of Utica Avenue, between 17th Street and Lake Street. 1 . 3 Assessor' s Parcel Number: AP #23-031-1, 2, 3 AP #23-040-6 through 12 a -1- 1 . 4 What is the present zoning on the property? Rl-0 & Rl-O-CD 1 . 5 what is the surrounding land use to the: North Civic Center South _ Existing Single family dwellings East Vacant West Civic Center 1 . 6 If the project is commercial or industrial give a complete description of activities and other pertinent information including but not limited to estimated employment per shift and any potential hazardous materials which may be used, etc. N/A 1. 7 If the project is residential, indicate number, .types and size of units and associated facilities. N/A 1. 8 If the project is institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift and maximum occupancy. N/A 1.9 Project land area (acres) 9± Number of parking spaces N/A 1. 10 Square feet of building area N/A Number of floors N/A 1. 11 Heiaht o� tallest structure involved in the project 2. 0 Environmental Setting 2. 1 Drainage and Flood Control '0 Please describe how on-site drainage will be accommodated. N/A ti f -2- to e.- 2 . 2 Land Form .a) Is the site presently graded? Yes b) 'Indicate tiler gross cubic yards of grading .proposed N/A , the ar-res of land to be graded N/A the amount' of earth to be transported on the site , and the amount of earth to be transported off the site N/A c) what will be the maximum height and grade of cut on fill after grading is completed? N/A 1. 3 Soils a) Type of soils on the subject site? (Submit soils report if available) . Ramona fine sandy loam 2. 4 Vegetation a) Attach a map indicating the location, type and size of trees located on the site. Indicate below the number, type and size of trees to be removed as a result of the project. Approximately 10 eucalyptus trees exist on the subject property 2 .5 Water Quality a) Does any portion of the project abut or encroach on beaches , estuaries , bays , tidelands , or inland water areas? No b) Describe how the project will effect any body of water. N/A 2. 6 Air Quality a) If the project is industrial, describe and list air pollution sources and quantity and types of pollutants emitted as a result of the project. N/A • 2. 7 Noise a) Describe any adjacent off-site noise sources ( i .e . , air- ports , industry , freeways) . N/A h) Wlr.r i .L• W i 1 1 he produced by the project? I f avtai J.al)io , pir,ase c1ive noise levels in decible measurement and typical time distribution when noise will be produced . N/A �� -3- • C. flow will noise produced by the project compare with existing noise levels? No change will result from the change of zone 2 . 8 Traffic Approximately how much traffic will be generated by the project : (check one) 0-50 vehicular trips - ifu"-JiN'��rn ,4�J,_g per da P P Y C 50 - 250 vehicular trips per day 250 - 500 vehicular trips per day over 500 vehicular trips per day 3.0 Public Services and Facilities 3. 1 Water a) Will the px'oject require installation or replacement of new water lines? No b) Please estimate the daily volume in gallons required to serve the project. N/A 3. 2 Sewer a) Will the project require installation or replacement of new sewer lines? N/A b) Please indicate the approximate amount of sewage generated from the project. N/A 3. 3 Solid Waste a) If the project is industrial , describe the type and • amount (pounds/day) of solid waste generated by the project. N/A 4 . 0 Social 4 . 1 Population Displacement a) Will any residential occupants be displaced by the project activities? No R b) Describe briefly the type of buildings or improvements to be demolished by the project. N/A 1 •�' -4- 5. 0 Mitigating Measures 5. 1 Are there measures included in the project which may conserve nonrenewable resources (e.g. electricity, gas, water) ? Please describe. No 5. 2 Are there measures included in the project which would protect or enhance flora and fauna? Please describe. No 5.3 Are there measures proposed in the design of the project to reduce noise pollution? Please describe. No 5. 4 Are there measures proposed in the design of the project (e.g. architectural treatment and landscaping) which have been coordinated with design of the existing community to minimize visual effect? Please describe. M No 5. 5 Are there measures proposed in the design of the project to reduce water pollution? Please describe. No 5. 6 Are there measures proposed which would reduce air pollution.> List any Air Pollution Control District equipment required. No 5. 7 Are there measures or facilities designed into the project to facilitate resource recovery and/or energy conservation (e.g. solar heating, special insulation, etc. ) ? Please describe. No 6. 0 Alternatives 6. 1 Are there alternatives to the project which may result in a lesser adverse environmental effect? Please explain all project' alternatives on an attached sheet. No 7 hereby certify that the information herein is true and accurate to the best okf my knowledge . k ►3"z— Signature Date Filed . b • I ORDINANCE NO. a595 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 9061 THEREOF TO PROVIDE FOR CHANGE OF ZONING FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDEN- TIAL DISTRICT, COMBINED WITH OIL PRODUCTION, AND LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL/CIVIC DISTRICT, COMBINED WITH OIL PRODUCTION, TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL/CIVIC DISTRICT/PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, COMBINED WITH OIL PRODUCTION ON REAL PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF UTICA AVENUE BETWEEN LAKE AND SEVENTEENTH STREETS ( ZONE CASE NO. 82-15) WHEREAS, pursuant to the state Planning and Zoning Law, the Huntington Beach Planning Commission and Huntington Beach City Council have had separate public hearings relative to Zone Case No. 82-15 wherein both bodies have carefully considered all information presented at said hearings, and after due con- sideration of the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission and all. evidence presented to said City Council, the City Council finds that such zone change is proper, and consis- tent with the general plan, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does ordain as follows : SECTION 1. The following described real property, generally located north of Utica Avenue between Lake and Seventeenth Streets , is hereby changed from R1-0, "Low Density Residential District, " combined with oil production, and R1-0-CD, "Low Density Residential/ Civic District," combined with oil production, to R2-0-CD-PD, "Medium Density Residential/Civic District/Planned Development, " combined with oil production: Lots 1, 2, 4, 63 8, 103 12 and 14 of Block 1902, Tract 12, and Lots 1 through 14 of Block 1901, Tract 12, and PARCEL 1 : That portion of Lots 1 and 3 a hb 10/26/82 (2) I Block 2001 of. Tract No. 12 in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California, as shown on the map recorded in Book 9, page 13 of Miscellaneous Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said county described as follows: Beginning at the most easterly corner of said Lot 3; thence north 4804110011 west 66. 67 feet along the northeasterly line of said Lot 3, thence south 40. 61 feet; thence west 70.00 feet to the northerly prolongation of the easterly line of Pine Street, 60.00 feet in width, as shown on said tract map; thence south 140.00 feet along said prolongation to the northwesterly line of Seventeenth Street, 70. 00 feet in width as shown on said map; thence north 4101910011 east 181.87 feet along said northwesterly line to the point of beginning, .containing an area of 0. 219 acres, more or less; and PARCEL 2: That portion of Seventeenth Street in Tract No. 12 in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California, as shown on the map recorded in Book 9, page 13 of Miscellaneous Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said county, and a portion of the land described in the deeds to the City of Huntington Beach, dated September 23, 1916 in Book 294, page 390 of Deeds, and dated July 21 , 1950 in Book 2045, page 79, both of Official Records in the office of the County Recorder of said county, described as follows: Beginning at the most easterly corner of Lot 3, Block 2001 as shown on said map; thence north 4804110011 west 66. 67 feet along the north- easterly _line of said Lot 3; thence north 47.66 feet to an intersection with the southwesterly line of Yorktown Avenue (formerly Mansion Avenue) as shown on the precise plan of alignment for Yorktown Avenue on file in the office of the City Engineer, said intersection being a point on a curve, concave northeasterly having radius of 850.00 feet, a radial line to said point bears south 3305611211 west; thence southeasterly 181.20 feet along said curve and said southwesterly line through a central angle of 12012 ' 52" to the be- ginning of a reverse curve concave southwesterly having a radius of 32.00 feet; thence south- 2. y � easterly 38.13 'f eet along said curve through a central angle of 68016 '40" to the northerly prolongation of the westerly line of Lake Street, 90. 00 feet in width, as shown on said map; thence south 84. 93 feet along said pro- longation to the southerly line of Seventeenth Street as shown on said map; thence west 131 .25 feet along said southerly line to the southeasterly line of said Seventeenth Street; thence south 41019 ,001, west 731 .18 feet along said southeasterly line to a point that bears north 41019100/1 east 385.42 feet from the most westerly corner of Lot 2, Block 1902 as shown on said map; thence north 15.15 feet to a _line parallel_ with and 10.00 feet north- westerly from said southeasterly line; .thence north 41 /1910011 east 460.29 feet along said parallel line to the northerly prolongation of the easterly line of Pine Street as shown on said map; thence north 90. 88 feet along said prolongation to the northwesterly line of said Seventeenth Street; thence north 41019100/1 east 181 .67 feet along said north- westerly line to the point of beginning, containing an area of 0.882 acres , more or less. SECTION 2. The Development Services Director is hereby di- rected to amend Section 9061 , District Map 2 (Sectional District Map 2-6-11) to reflect Zone Case No. 82-15, described in Sec- tion 1 hereof. A copy of said district map, as amended hereby is available for inspection in the office of the City Clerk. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of , 1982. ATTEST: Mayor . City Clerk 3. ,fit D -mob REVIEWED AND APPROVED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: i City Administrat City Attorney INITIATED AND APPROVED: /4rector of Dev lopment S e.rvic es a lb A Publish 11-18-82 Iill � NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO THE PC DENIAL OF ZONE CASE 82-15 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible on Monday the 6th • day of December , 19 82• for the purpose of considering an appeal filed by Councilman Pattinson to the denial of a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres of property located north of Utica Avenue, between 17th and Lake Streets from Rl-0 (Low Density Residential combined with oil production) and RI-O-CD (Low Density Residential combined with oil production within Civic District) to R2-0-PD-CD (Medium Density Residential District combined with oil production, Planned Development Suffix and within Civic District). The City Council will also consider Negative Declaration No. 82-40 in conjunction with Zone Case No. 82-15. A legal description is on file in the Department of Development.Services. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said appeal and Negative Declaration No. 82-40 Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. 92648 - (714) 536-5227 DATED 11-18-82 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk w l NOTICE TO CLERK TO SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING ITEM O►'�-2. G - I r%A O. UzC.. W 2Q•4C TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE DATE: Alipv. FROM: Q��f • S.� ►r V((�.��_ PLEASE SCHEDULE A/PUBBLLICC HEARING USING THE ATTACHED LEGAL NOTICE FOR THE _C DAY OF I — -� AP's are attached AP's will follow No AP's Initiated by: Planning Commission Planning Department Petition * Appeal Other Adoption of Environmental Status (x) YES NO Refer toMIKE' , Planning Department - Extension # 5-1 for additional information. * If appeal , please transmit exact wording; Lo he required in tale legal . /ing iLEGAL NOTICE t Services Cv%.►r i�- NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ONE CASE NO. 82-15 - kp �NOTI E IS HEREBY GIVEN that a publibe held by the City n of the Cit Beach, California, for the purpose oe consideringo. 82-15, Q r -to t �& CF a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres of property located north of Utica Avenue, . between 17th and Lake Streets from R1-0 (Low Density Residential combined with oil production) and R1-0-CD (Low Density Residential combined with oil production within Civic District) to R2-0-PD-CD (Medium Density Residential District combined with oil production, Planned Development Suffix and within Civic District) . The n will also consider Negative Declaration No. 82-40 in conjunction with Zone Case No. 82-15 . A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services . i /L I r-+- Said hearing will be held at the hour of 7 :80 P .M. , on L Co ,19Ba in the Council Chambers Building of the Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed Zone Case No. 82-15 Further information may be obtained from the City Planning Department. Telephone No. (714) 536-5271 DATED this 23rd day of October, 1982 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION James W. Palin By Secretary i I I ' � I ---- ---- --------------- ------------------- ---- I --- -------- - - - - -- -- - 23-023012 , Jos P Riley � fro�1#�pper� ' I .c� ' Cho Aspen Pacific I Qctd2er 5, 1982 OH) 911 Studebaker Rd Suite 280 law Beach, Calif ' 25-035-06 90815 , Virgil Bmoden ' 3259 Alta Lag%= Blvd. Laguna Beech, Chlif ' 92651 ' I 25-023-15 i 25--035-07 ' Peter E VanElten ' James Allan 6792 Presidente Drive c% Richud P "illiam ' Hmt•ington Roach, Calif' - - I 21082 Whitehorse Lane 92b48 i Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 ------ -- - ---------- ----I------------------------L--------------- -- ---- 25-023-17 , I ' I ' I ' I I ' I ' 25-023-17 I David C Clark I 19731 Topeka Lane Hmtington Beach, Calif I I I 92646 -------- --- ----- --- ----------------------------- I ------ -------------- - 25-023-20 Villa Pacifica Assoc. I ' See Own Your Own Boole ' I ' 610 kkuport canter Drive Suite 800 - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - � - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- -4 Beach, Calif ' 92660 1 ' I I ' I ' --- --------------- ------ -- --------- ---- --- ---- - - --------- - -- --- - - 25-023-21 ; -,-- RaWcnd Wilson q/o Nlarcia Ox* 8165 Dart wor Drive I ' Huntington Reach, Calif 92646 I- - - - - ---- - - - - - - - - T - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - A - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 25-035-05 I bang M chae j U076 Blue Alliun I ' yountain Valley, Calif ' 92708 I ' - ----------------- -----L- - - - ------ - -- ------ --- - � - -- --------- - - - - - - - - I I ' I I f I ' I I ' � I I I 1 � I ----- --- ---------- -- - ----- -- - - - - - --- - J-- - - -- - - - - - - 2 3-074-06 8ddie LlOgden I zc M82-15 ' 501n Mestnglt 1832 Main Street October S' 1982 WH) 17371 Drey Lane Humtingtan Haack, Calif I Rmtington Beech, Calif 92648 ' 92647 - -- ----------- -- -- - -- --� - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -i-- - - - -- - - -- 23--0621-18 I 23-072-06 ; 23-074-18 Anthony P D Arripo Gisela L Nett William T Newland 3rd 1825 Park Street I 1836 We Street ; 1828 Pine Street Kintin gton Beach. Calif ' aintinrgtm Beech, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92648 ; 92648 92648 ----- -- ---- ------------I----------------- - - - - --- ---- -- 23-062-24 ; 23-072-07 ' 23-074-19 Lloyd E Daru.elson I Lake Park Estates ; Don O C mft 1828 Main Street ' c/o F W Devalopment Inc 1830 Pine Street Hmtingt un Beach, Calif i 15052 Springdale Street tzmtington Beech. Calif 92648 ' Suite A I 92648 --- -----------I--- - -- ---- -- ---- --- -- -- - 23-062-29 I Huntington Beach, Calif ; 23-074-20 David C Frampton ; 92649 Stephen 0 Batchelor 1834 Main Street I ---- ; 1836 Pine Street Huntington Beach, Calif I Huntirxlton Beach, Calif 926" I ' 42648 ------------- -- ---- - --- --- - -- -- -------------;- - -- - --- - -- - 23-062-30 ; 23_074-01 ' 23-074-21 John L Peterson I E1ope Day Christopher herr Taylor 18M 17th Street i Hope P Grow 1840 Pine Street Eimtington Reach, Calif I 205 Utica Avenue � E#art1 92648 , � I n9bor► Bleach, Calif I, 1ntington Beach, Calif 92648 926" --- -------- ---- l---- - - - - -- 23-072-02 23-074-02 i 23-074-22 Daniel L Montoya ; David N Gabaldon ' Ri&ard J Kigxhy 1848 Lake S� cif i 2023 Nornan Place ; 1.842 Pine Street Hunti nr�tlon � I -Anaheim, Calif I Huntington HI®a Cal if li f 9,2648 I 92806 i 92648 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- L - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 23-072-03 William R Riddell � 23--074-03 23-074-23� Itavroo E Pasini I Melvin 0 Remington 1846 We Street ' 1837 Lake Street ' P.O. Box 503 H<ntIrxft n reach, Calif � 92648 i H��� m ��' Calif ; Huntington Beach, Calif 92648 92647 ----- ------------- ----- ------------- -�- ------ -- -- --- - - T- -- - --- --- - - - - - 23-072-04 23-074-04 1 ,25-023-06 J Michael Huskins I Hnw wd J Gilliland Leonard L Bern 1842 Lake Street I 1831 Lake Street , 7812 Liberty Street Huntington Beach, Calif t funt.irn7ton Beach, Calif I HuntiN-tur i beach, Cal-if 92648 I 92648 i 92647 - -- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -- - L - -- - - - -- - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - t - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 23-072-05 , 23-074-05 i 25-023-11 Donald L Mtm-my ' Drxnald L Wi them I Peter E Vbn El ten 1838 Lake Street E3each. Calif Leo J Bruaggernan 405 lEtr Street H�ntinybon 1u182 Beverly Drive I Emtingtcn Leech, Calif 92648 i Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 i 92648 -------- ---------------�--- ------------------- --i-------- - - ----- -- - -- - I I ' I I I I I I I i I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I --------------------- - - 234AW14 I ' 23-061-Q ftntiaQton Beech Cb. ZC "3-15 Dept of Vets Affairs of Tax Division , OcCc.bK 5, 1M QM) I State of California 225 Bush Street 1 ; Robert M Letson - San Francisco,- Calif 94120 ; 1842 Park Street - ---- - ---- -- - - --- - - - - - 23-010-15 ; 23-061-20 Hntington Beach, Calif City of Huntington Beach I William M Bruce 92648 1837 Pine Steen , 1 Ftr*AzQtGn Beach Calif ' 1 92648 ' - -- ------- 1-- - - -------- --- - - - -- -- - - -' - ---- - - 23-020-05 1 23-061-21 23-061-43 Hkntirgtcn Union High School Alma A Ac terberty Lary E Alford District 1 1815 Pine Street 1827 Pine Street 1902 17th Street ' Huntington Beach Calif kkintington Beech, Calif F1untington Beach, Calif 92648 92648 92948 23-031-03 ' 23-061-22 23-061-44 I H ntl.ngtcm Pacific Oarp I Rhos H omw art E Bolrns 2110 Main Street ' 1836 Park Street I 19841 Sea Canyon Circle Kzntington Bead, Calif I AnitinQOLYI Beactti Calif HYIti[YJtArI Basch, Calif --926" ' 92648 , 92648 ------------------- -1 - -- - - ------- --- - - ------- -- -- - - -- - - - I ' 23-040-W 1 23-061-23 23-062-01 Huntington Beach OD. ; Varle A Mwling I Dennis Hiccole standard Oil Co. of Calif. I 1828 Park Street 400 3rd Street Property Tax Division ' Hun im ton gam. Calif I Fkx*- lrqton Beach, calif 225 Bush Street 92648 ' 92648 - ---- ------ ------ I San Etwiciaco, Calif 23-061-24 I 23-062-02 94120 I Robert S Laughlin ; Walter L VanDeusen I 1830 Park Street I 1841 Park Street � Rw*Amgton Beech, Calif Ftintington Beach. Calif - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - --,- 92648 I 92648 23-040-13 ' 23-061-32 ; 23-%2-03 w B Harrell , Robert B Waschke_it I Will Fbwler 2110 Main Street 315 W Utica Sheet 1837 Park Street Huntington Reach, Calif Huntington Bead, Calif I Huntington Beach, Calif 92648 I 99w 92648 ------- - ---------------F- - - ------------- - - --- - - - ' -- - - -- - - - - - - - 23-061-12 i 83-061-36 23-062-04 Robert Hubbart I Barry L Waters Hiobert L Tarzian 1833 Pine Street ; 1841 Pine Street 1833 Park Styr-t Huntingdon Beach, Calif I Hwtlnlgton Beach, calif Hmtingto n 13each, Calif 92648 I 92648 , 92648 - --- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - i- - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - -I- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- 23-061-19 ' 23-061-37 ; 23-062-05 George F Abbond ; Peter T Ywazaki Clarriasa Pier-am 16" Paris Street I 305 Utica Street ; 1831 Park Street Huntington Beech, Calif i Huntington Beach, Calif I Ifunt.irvto n reach, Calif 92649 I 92648 92648 -- - ------- -------------- ------ --- -- - ------- ----- ------ - - -- ---- - - - I , ' ' I I I 1 I ' I 1 23-Or 43 23-061-19 L,arryyN�lf-orft// ZC 482-15 George F Abbond GPA 82-8 1827 Pin�ceet 1848 Park Street Hunti on h, Calif Nov. 16, 1982 (JH) Huntington Beach, Calif 9264 92648 23-061-35 23-061-28 23-061-32 J E Wickersham Gouglas G Oldfield Robert B Waschkeit 1821 Pine Street 1816 Park Street 315 W Utica Street Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92648 92648 92648 23-061-34 23-061-27 074-01 Patricia A Joseph John C Dailey Ho Day 1819 Pine Street 1820 Park Street Hope r \ Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 205 ca nue 92648 92648 H ngton Be ch, Ca 1i t °2F .. .. .. .. . .... . ................ . . . . . .. . . 23-061-21 23-061-25 23 074-02 Alma A Arterberry Margaret I Riggs Dave N GabEildon 1815 Pine Street 1824 Park Street 2023 Place \ / Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Ana lif 92648 92648 928 6 / 23-061-45 23-061-23 23-074-03 Viola B Bird Lo zo E PeriniVerl \ 308 Springfield Ave West 1828 A Cowling 1837 Street Huntington Beach, Calif 828 Park Street 92648 Huntington Beach, Calif 9z 48 gto Beach, i'a.l t f / 92648 23-061-46 23- 4-04 23-061-24 Wilfred L Schryer Howar J Gi iland 304 W Springfield Avenue Robert Laughlin 1831 La trect \ Huntington Beach, Calif 1830 Park Street Hun o Beach. i'a1if 92648 Huntington Beach, Calif 92648 92 ...................................................................................... ...................... . 23-061-40 2 74-05 23-061-22 James H Castle Dona L WitbP'` 318 Springfield Avenue Roger Hosmer 1836 Park Street Leo J B ,genan Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 10182 -ve . , Drive 92648 : 92648 HU ngton Be i, ...................................................................................... . ...................... . 23-061-41 23-074-06 2 061-42 Wallace Morris Kreag Sr Jo Mastri Dept f Vets Affa of 18 Outtrider Rd 17371 Lane Rolling Hills, Calif State Calif is Hun n Beach, Robert Le n '.�l f 90274 1842 Park et 47 23-061-30 Hunti ton Be h, Calif 23-074-07 John W Budd 92 Earl R Presson 1810 Park Street _ 1821 Lake Street Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach. Cali 92648 92648 ..................... ............... ................................................................... .. ... ---- ............. . . .......... ...... ...... ... . ............... .. . . .. . . . .... .. . . . ... . .. ................ ... 23_0621,�l 62-24 -15 - N. L _(_ DennisCalifX ZC 482 L�ioy - DanieLoKn 1 400 3rd -et General Plan Arrenckent 82-8 6 . t 1828 n eet Hun gton L ch, November 16, 1982 (JH) n 8 Hunti Beach, Calif 9 48 62-24 1 y $ 0 aniel ti IDun _Bea 9 8 ..... ....... . .......................... ........................................... .................... .. . . 23- -02 23-062-14 23-062-25 Walte Deusen Beulah F Stephens John F Drake 1841 P Street 1816 Main Street 402 Springfield Street n Hun gton ach, calif X Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 926 8 X 92648 92648 . ................ ....................... ........................................... ........................ . . . . . 2 06 0 23-062-16 2 062-30 Wj�11 %er David D Perry John Pet- son 1 Street 1812 Main Street 1808 treet 8 a�t tj a Hun ng Cali Huntington Beach, Calif Hunti Beach, Calif 92/ Beach, L5 48 92648 92 ..X.................... . ........................................ . .... ...... . 23-062- 23-062-17 2 -062 29 Robert L zian Darlene Culluii Da C 1833 P K �treet P.O. Box 503 183>4 Frail Hun nach, Calif Newhall, Calif ti c Hunti ach, C-Cal.i F 9.26U79to 91322 9�2 . ... .. ...... ...... .. . .. .. . .... . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ............ . . . 23-062-05 23-X�622_18 21- 1-37 P ierson Antho P Arrigo Peter er a a tic t Pa t N treet 1825 Pa street X 305 Utic t Calif n to - rec Huntyng on leach, Hun ton ach, Calif Hunt ton ch, Cal 1 f 92?8 8 92 9 8 ...... ..................... ----------­111111-11-11.............. .. . . . . . 23-062-07 23-062-19 23-061-36 Paul R Dusterhoft Robert M Dunker Barry L Waters 1817 Park Street 1821 Park Street 1841 Pine Street Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92648 92648 92648 ...... . ......................... ........................................... 23-062-08 23-062-21 23-061-20 Maxine C Putnam Max L Fullmer William M Bruce 1815 Park Street 1820 Main Street 1847 Pine Street Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach. Calic 92648 92648 92648 ........ . ....................................................................... . ...................... . . .23-062-09 23-062-22 2_Nj06l-Hl2b Stanley Ruiz Newton John Alleman R u bar"L-- 1811 Park Street Sandra Lee Perry 1833 __6 et Huntington Beach, Calif 1812 Main Street Hun n Beach, 92648 Huntington Beach, Calif 92648 ............................................ .............................. . . . . . ..... ............'8 33 Hun n Be ach, 23- 2-12 23-062-23 23X61-4U%'z' Eddie 09 Mary E Harrell R, U<B 0 0 41 �_on - t 19 8 >on each. ;H 1832 1 treet 1822 Main Street 19841 you I Ma I � �t if Hunti n . ach, Cal Huntington Beach, Calif H -ton ach. 926 92648 648 .......................................................................................................... . . . . ....... ................... 23-074-08 Louis M. 0 Brien ZC #82-15 1819 Lake Street GPA 482-8 Huntington Beach, Calif Nov. 16, 1982 (JH) 92648 : .........................•-----•••--•-•--................................. . .. . .. . . 23-074-09 23-074-16 Nina J Decker : Robert D Bolen 1811 Lake Street 1818 Pine Street Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92648 : 29648 ..........................................:......................... ........ .. . 23-074-10 23-074-17 Thomas W Overton Joanna B Bravender 1807 Lake Avenue 1810 Park Street Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92648 29648 23-074-11 -074-18 Robert A Montgomery wi iam T N 3rd 202 Springfield Street 1828 �n reet I Huntington Beach, Calif Hunt' n Beach, Calif 92648 9 8 23-074-12 2Xr Dept of Vets Affairs of DState of Calif 1eetNorman C McShea : Hach, Calif220 ESprringfield Street 2 pWOX�LYI�vt,p GYJ�01GY1L Z1[�L�GLL1G ri40G :-..- Huntington Beach, Calif 23- 74-20 92648 Step n 0 H�chelor ---------------------------- 1836 Street Hunt gt Beach, Calif 9 8 ........................................... . .•--•••••-•-......... ................ .. . . 23-074-13 23->4-21William R Green : Chr oseph Taylor1806 Pine Street 184Street Huntington Beach, Calif Hun ach, Calif 92648 926 ................................................... . ............................. ................... . . 23-074-14 23- 74-22 Doris M Ferguson Ric J Murphy 1810 Pine Street 1842 Pi t.rEet Huntington Beach, Calif Hunti o ach, Calif 92648 296 ............ ............................. ..........................................:.... .. ... . . . 23-074-15 074-23 David G Wondell Me n 0 ngton tg 1814 Pine Street P.O. !03 Huntington Beach, Calif ElUnti ach, Calif 92648 296 ............................ ..... ........ ........ :......... . r _.... �_ .y �N CITY OF HUNTIN BEACH CITY COUNCIL COMM6.,NI ' TION ° ° - .HUNTINGTON BEACH y ✓ f TO Alicia Wentworth, FROMlou�ncilman Pattinson City Clerk SUBJECT APPEAL TO DENY CONFORMANCE DATE November 5, 1982 WITH GENERAL PLAN 82-8. & ZONE CHANGE NO. 82-15 This communication will serve as written notice of my appeal to the denial of Zone Change No. 82-15 and Conformance with General Plan No. 82-8 . I feel that the proposed rezoning and street vacations are consistent with the General Plan and with the purposes established for. the Yorktown-Lake Redevelopment Project. RP :lp • • P0,22 19f2- C - l4ar-41, rn-tan [eQSe d(3 Y)o� gizzr�-� �'tiis zone C�rr�e, �e ` 0,e i n 0. lauel� 1^e3iden�Ial CLrect, awd hr�ue Spen � Q.nd money �o e� l�h�e ora� �ornE Ca.ncd pr�,p T 6Ctc�ds �jar) o � n'tulf�'ple dQ)O//i'r)3s 1- 3 po }- i ,) Plea,3e Jo na� de9� roy wtiaf his -��ken yearS Mrs. po ber� ISyz )Oczrk S�Pun-�,�n I-on c�z�� lip • 0 Publish 11-18-82 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO THE PC DENIAL OF ZONE CASE 82-15 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible on Monday the 6th day of December , 19,$2• for the purpose of considering an appeal filed by Councilman Pattinson to the denial of a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres of property located north of Utica Avenue, between 17th and Lake Streets from RI-0 (Low Density Residential combined with oil production) and R1-0-CD (Low Density Residential combined with oil production within Civic District) to R2-0-PD-CD (Medium Density Residential District combined with oil production, Planned Development Suffix and within Civic District). The City Council will also consider Negative Declaration No. 82-40 in conjunction with Zone Case No. 82-15. A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said appeal and Negative Declaration No. 82-40 Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. 92648 - (714) 536-5227 DATED 11-18-82 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk Publish 11-18-82 i 1' NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO THE PC DENIAL OF ZONE CASE 82-15 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible on Monday the 6th _ day of December 19-- 2• for the purpose of considering an appeal filed by Councilman Pattinson to the denial of a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres of property located north of Utica Avenue, between 17th and Lake Streets from Rl-0 (Low Density Residential combined with oil production) and R1-0-CD (Low Density Residential combined with oil production within Civic District) to R2-0-PD-CD (Medium Density Residential District combined with oil production, Planned Development Suffix and within Civic District). The City Council will also consider Negative Declaration No. 82-40 in conjunction with Zone Case No. 82-15. A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services. t v� All interested eersons are invited to attend Sa Qd hearing and express their opinions for or against said appeal and Negative Declaration No. 82-40 Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. 92648 - (714) 536-5227 DATED 11-18-82 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wentworth • City Clerk j CITY CLERK p,t%A. �, •+..� d? City of Huntington Beach 18 NOV P.O.BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 1C -V 1wb� I ;trolling,Yocca.Carlson&Rauih ij 25-023-20 Villa Pacifica Assoc. °0• i :k' n <Own a 61 c a'I Suite acach, Cal Aj 02 66 s ' ' `i leap CALIFORNIA2648 City of Hunti gton Beach P.O.BOX 190 b y =NOV24'82 = � �� L,;_;•,�,a„„f� '. _ _ _ ; 670 1-1 2` •23--20 Vi.Ua Pacifica Aaeoda -Own Your Own 61 Drive Suite 660 Calif r r nor;IN DMLOPMENT 40NICES COT Ia � CIVIC CENTER AND LAKE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD P. 0. Box loo 2A 9z6a8 PETITION AGAINST ZONE CHANGE. �� WE THE UNDERSIGNED CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND NEIGHBORHOOD MEMBERS DIRECTLY AFFECTED WITH PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE, LAND EXCHANGE AND PARKING CHANGE ARE AGAINST PROPOSALS 82-8 82-15 AND 82-4o. WE URGE THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL TO CREATE AND MAINTAIN AN R-1 ZONE ON THE LAND EAST AND WEST OF LAKE STREET FROM YORKTOWN AVENUE SOUTH AND TO RETAIN THE R-1 ZONE NORTH OF UTICA AVENUE, EAST OF LAKE STREET. THE HOME OWNERS AND RESIDENTS OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD FROM MAIN ST. PA?K ST. PINE ST. AND LAKE ST. AND CROSS STREETS MOST STRONGLY RECOIEND TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL TO .MAINTAIN R-1 RESIDENTIAL FOR THIS NEIGHBORHOOD. 'E URGE, THE PLANNINJW COMMMION TO AND PLAN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD SURFACE STREETS ROUTING AtiD PARKING WITH THE RESIDENTS OF THIS NEIGHBO }D I13G THr" PRIME CONSIDERATION. 1 r• 7ao 63 4o r� ,-�7 t s F 1 .ram. �o��,�v-,��.✓ i��- 8 ��-�-�-�'-�"�a.`°,�-�.� /aft /vzl Aj- -1 !� 16 77, rr 10 1 p d ' /7//l Sao doe) l�°36 t�lNe Sr� t-1��3� b'"dG ��z6 i7lo PIA tt•e. �G Irow 14 72) fs )Q6 TU 6 > 1� 33 c �73 P . r Ck c� � j 3 7 Sl a tn.,rrio 5`r. e�W— yor z S3�-yo1e (ft cl -6Ld �^�C% �d.4rr� � S34 — z103 A - 2 73 -1- eoL� S��, 0T 536 -4 3-9 yt �Gl10 ����T'• ec�b� 9. 6 } la,�f � / hervv Jry ! a.s C�c a.5 I I i t ;7 009114 . --0 LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CASE NO. 82-15 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will bgheld by the City Planning Commission of the City of Huntington oh, California, for the purpose of considering Zone Change No." a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres of property located north of Utica Avenue,. between 17th and Lake Streets from R1-0 (Low Density Residential combined with oil production) And R1-0-CD (Low Density Residential combined with oil production within Civic District) to R2-0-PD-CD (Medium Density Residential .Di4tict combined with oil production,, Planned Development .Suffix and -within Civic District) . The Planning Commission will also consider Negative Declaration No. 82-40 in conjunction with Zone Case No. 8.2-15. A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services. Said hearing will be held at the hour of 7: 0 P.M. , on November 2, 1982 , in the Council Chambers Building of the i Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed Zone Case No. 82-15 I Further information may be obtained from the City Planning Department. Telephone No. (714) 536-5271 DATED this 23rd day of October, 1982 I CITY PLANNING COMMISSION James W. Palin By Secretary �19 �6n —OQ6 s LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CASE NO. 82-15 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, ...,California, for the purpose of considering Zone Change No. 82-15, a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres of property located north of Utica Avenue, . between 17th and Lake Streets from R1-0 (Low Density Residential combined with oil production) and R1-0-CD (Low Density Residential combined with oil production within Civic District) to R2-0-PD-CD (Medium Density Residential District combined with oil production,. Planned Development .Suffix and within Civic District) . The Planning Commission will also consider Negative Declaration No. 82-40 in conjunction with Zone Case No. 82-15. A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services. ��F.�t Wit/, ^ �'✓/G b �i-'.c�ir i 7 T'� cif=/�i//��r,�:r'v[�!� �-,�� ct�.G y /Ty/ S44 -�''zJ� O %) ' ��,v��� rp i✓c��v�� Dl=.✓sue<y ��c4 r�U r✓rp,�'�� S i�✓<�y �q�v Said hearing will be held at the hour of 7.-00 P.M. , on November 2, 1982 , in the Council Chambers Building of the Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed Zone Case No. 82-15 . Further information may be obtained from the City Planning Department. Telephone No. (714) 536-5271 DATED this 23rd day of October, 1982 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION James W. Palin By Secretary G �� /t�U ' S-4-/ /L,1`,s o, LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CASE NO. 82-15 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, ..California, for the purpose of considering Zone Change No. 82-15, a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres of property located north of Utica Avenue, . between 17th and Lake Streets from R1-0 (Low Density Residential combined with oil production) and R1-0-CD (Low Density Residential combined with oil production within Civic District) to R2-0-PD-CD (Medium Density Residential District combined with oil production, Planned Development .Suffix and within Civic District) . The Planning Commission will also consider Negative Declaration No. 82-40 in conjunction with Zone Case No. 82-15. A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services. 12 Said hearing will be held at the hour of 7:00 P.M. , on November 2, 1982 , in the Council Chambers Building of the Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed Zone Case No. 82-15 . Further information may be obtained from the City Planning Department. Telephone No. (714) 536-5271 DATED this 23rd day of October, 1982 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION James W. Palin By Secretary • • ' Z LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING . ZONE CASE NO. 82-15 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, :.California, for the purpose of considering Zone Change No. 82-15, a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres of property located north of Utica Avenue, . between 17th and Lake Streets from R1-0 (Low Density Residential combined with oil production) and R1-0-CD (Low Density Residential combined with oil production within Civic District) to R2-0-PD-CD (Medium Density Residential District combined with oil production,. Planned Development .Suffix and within Civic District) . The Planning Commission will also consider Negative Declaration No. 82-40 in conjunction with Zone Case No. 82-15. A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services. e� Said hearin g wi4kiife our o :00 P.M. , on November 2, 1982 , in the Council Chambers Building of the Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed Zone Case No. 82-15 . Further information may be obtained from the City Planning Department. Telephone No. (714) 536-5271 DATED this 23rd day of October, 1982 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION James W. Palin By Secretary 4)0 PA D(Q, Fovv-��� OCT 2a19& LEGAL NOTICE Pment Ser*" NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CASE NO. 82-15 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, California, for the purpose of considering Zone Change No. 82=15, a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres of property located north of Utica Avenue,. between 17th and Lake Streets from R1-0 (Low Density Residential combined with oil production) and R1-0-CD (Low Density Residential combined with oil production within Civic District) to R2-0-PD-CD (Medium Density Residential District combined with oil production, Planned Development .Suffix and within. Civic District) . The Planning Commission will also consider Negative Declaration No. 82-40 in conjunction with Zone Case No. 82-15. A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services. L-- AI o Vo 7 F Said hearing will be held at the hour of 7:00 P.M. , on November 2, 1982 , in the Council Chambers Building of the Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed Zone Case No. 82-15 . Further information may be obtained from the City Planning Department. Telephone No. (714) 536-5271 DATED this 23rd day of October, 1982 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION James W. Palin By Secretary �iTrY - • LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CASE NO. 82-15/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 82-40 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, California, for the purpose of considering Zone Case No. 82-15 and Negative Declaration No. 82-40, a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres of property located north of Utica Avenue, between 17th and Lake Streets from R1-0 (Low Density Residential . combined with oil production) and Rl-O-CD (Low Density Residential District combined with oil production within the Civic District) to R2-0-CD (Medium Density Residential District combined with oil pro- duction within the Civic District) . The Planning Commission will also consider Negative Declaration No. 82-40 in conjunction with Zone Case No. 82-15 . A .legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services. 1 =_ Z'e_1L4 Site�L.��N G �� - �._�'G Z��"-- •-G/�':- �G�- `Tiu- / ./!lam� �L��i�G•-���-�t'� C.C.t••�ce Said hearing will be held at the hour of 7: 00 P .M. , on October 19, 1982 in the Council Chambers Building of the Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invitedtto attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed Zone Case No . 82-1.5 and Negative Declaration NO. 82-40 Further information may be obtained from the City Planning Department. Telephone No. (714) 536-5271 DATED this 7th day of October, 1982 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION James W. Palin �l By Secretary LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CASE NO. 82-15/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 82-40 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, California, for the purpose of considering Zone Case No. 82-15 and Negative Declaration No. 82-40, a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres of property located north of Utica Avenue, between 17th and Lake Streets from R1-0 (Low Density Residential . combined with oil production) and R1-0-CD (Low Density Residential District combined with oil production within the Civic District) to R2-0-CD (Medium Density Residential District combined with oil pro- duction within the Civic District) . The Planning Commission will also consider Negative Declaration No. 82-40 in conjunction with Zone Case No. 82-15 . A legal description is on file in the Department of or Development Services. c Said hearing will be held at the hour of 7: 00 P .M. , on October 19, 1982 , in the Council Chambers Building of the Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invited'� to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed Zone Case No . 82-15 and Negative Declaration NO. 82-40 Further information may be obtained from the City Planning Department. Telephone No. (714) 536-5271 DATED this 7th day of October, 1982 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION James W. Palin By Secretary LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CASE NO. 82-15/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 82-40 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, California, for the purpose of considering Zone Case No. 82-15 and Negative Declaration No. 82-40, a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres of property located north of Utica Avenue, between 17th and Lake Streets from R1-0 (Low Density Residential . combined with oil production) and Rl-O-CD (Low Density Residential District combined with oil production within the Civic District) to R2-0-CD (Medium Density Residential District combined with oil pro- duction within the Civic District) . The Planning Commission will also consider Negative Declaration No. 82-40 in conjunction with Zone Case No. 82-15 . A .legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services. Said hearing will be held at the hour of 7= 0 .M. , on October 19, 1982 in the Council Chambers Building of the Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invitedtto attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed Zone Case No . 82-1.5 and Negative Declaration NO. 82-40 Further information may be obtained from the City Planning Department. Telephone No. (714) 536-5271 DATED this 7th day of October, 1982 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION James W. Palin By Secretary e- are O o'e � � '1 �1 ©fitr n !q `J �J T i S i S Q /'Ovely res id en4,, c' � area- Q Vl4 n + n ��doZ a r miler)�S Loc w no4 e- h 6n c a f-ej. pu44i � Devsiopment serwcft s LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CASE NO. 82-15/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 82-40 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, California, for the purpose of considering Zone Case No. 82-15 and Negative Declaration No. 82-40, a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres of property located north of Utica Avenue, between 17th and Lake Streets from R1-0 (Low Density Residential ..combined with oil production) and Rl-O-CD (Low Density Residential District combined with oil production within the Civic District) to R2-0-CD (Medium Density Residential District combined with oil pro- duction within the Civic District) . The Planning Commission will also consider Negative Declaration No. 82-40 in conjunction with Zone Case No. 82-15 . A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services . Said hearing will be held at the hour of 7: 00 P .M. , on October 19, 1982 , in the Council Chambers Building of the Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invitedtto attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed Zone Case No . 82-15 and Negative Declaration NO. 82-40 Further information may be obtained from the City Planning Department. Telephone No. (714) 536-5271 DATED this 7th day of October, 1982 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION James W. Palin By Secretary LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CASE NO. 82-15/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 82-40 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, California, for the purpose of considering Zone Case No. 82-15 and Negative Declaration No. 82-40, a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres of property located north of Utica Avenue, between 17th and Lake Streets from R1-0 (Low Density Residential ..combined with oil production) and R1-0-CD (Low Density Residential District combined with oil production within the Civic District) to R2-0-CD (Medium Density Residential District combined with oil pro- duction within the Civic District) . The Planning Commission will also consider Negative Declaration No. 82-40 in conjunction with Zone Case No. 82-15 . A .legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services. L a� C_ G—v� c�►.,,.�. Said hearing ill be held at the hour of i7: 00 P .M. , on October 19, 1982 , in the Council Chambers Building of the Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invitedl� to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed Zone Case No . 82-1.5 and Negative Declaration NO. 82-40 Further information may be obtained from the City Planning Department. Telephone No. (714) 536-5271 DATED this 7th day of October, 1982 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION James W. Palin By Secretary CEIVED LEGAL NOTICE oe "fe"'c serv+� NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CASE NO. 82-15 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, California, for the purpose of considering Zone Change No. 82-15, a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres of property located north of Utica Avenue,. between 17th and Lake Streets from R1-0 (Low Density Residential combined with oil production) and Rl-O-CD (Low Density Residential -comb-ined with oil production within Civic District) to R2-0-PD-CD (Medium Density Residential District combined with oil production, Planned Development .Suffix and within Civic District) . The Planning Commission will also consider Negative Declaration No. 82-40 in conjunction with Zone Case No. 82-15. A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services. I PROTEST THIS ZONING CHANGE; THIS AREA IS ALL R-1 NOW AND HAS BEEN FOR YEARS. THERE IS NO GOOD RFASON TO CHANGE ANY PROPERTY IN TI S AREA TO R-2. With 17th ST. CLOSED AND TUHM INTO A PARKING LOT, THERE IS ONLY CNE STREET (UTICA) LEFT TO CONNECT MAIN AND LAKE. THE HIGH SCHOOL TRAFIC ALONE CROIDS THIS STREET. PARKING ON UTICA WILL BE INCREASED WITH MULTIPLE DENSITY AND THE STREET SVMER JUST DRIVES DOWN THE MIDDLE OF THE STREET NOW. (ANOTHER WASTE OF MONEY). THE IMPACT OF MULTIPLE DWELLINGS IN THIS AREA WILL BE CONSIDERABLE AND WILL NOT ADD TO THE VALUE OF THE AREA BUT WILL BRING IN TRANSIENT PEOPLE WHO DO NOT ADD TO THE WELL BEING OF A COMMUNITY. ALSO R-2 ZONING WILL DEPRECIATE THE ESTABLISHED COMMUNITY THAT BOARDERS THE INVOLVED AREA. fO/P6A1A�✓ 'TlJIIIIE� i//1�'1�,�'s�r" •RTJC Said hearing will be held at the our of 7:00 P.M. , on November 2, 1982 in the Council Chambers Building of the Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed Zone Case No. 82-15 . Further information may be obtained from the City Planning Department. Telephone No. (714) 536-5271 DATED this . 23rd day of October, 1982 . CITY PLANNING COMMISSION James W. Palin By Secretary I . n r LEGAL NOTICE It .1 199 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Development 5ervi:es ZONE CASE NO. 82-15 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, :.California, for the purpose of considering Zone Change No. 82-15, a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres of property located north of Utica Avenue, . between 17th and Lake Streets from R1-0 (Low Density Residential combined with oil production) and R1-0-CD (Low Density Residential combined with oil production within Civic District) to R2-0-PD-CD (Medium Density Residential District combined with oil production, Planned Development .Suffix and within Civic District) . The Planning Commission will also consider Negative Declaration No. 82-40 in conjunction with Zone Case No. 82-15. A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services. Huai %� •�,/ /cam Said he ing will be held-at the our of 7: 00 P.M. , on November 2, 1982 , in the Council Chambers Building of the Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed Zone Case No. 82-15 . Further information may be obtained from the City Planning Department. Telephone No. (714) 536-5271 DATED this 23rd day of October, 1982 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION James W. Palin By Secretary THOMAS M. MATSON 1945 SHERINGTON PLACE. STE. G-31.3 NEWPORT BEACH. CA. 02663 (714) 631-5164 1812 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA. 92648 October 12, 1982 J City Planning Commission 1. g Council Chambers Building QCI Civic Center ment Services 2000 Main Street Uevel°P Huntington Beach, CA. 92648 Att: James W. Palin, Secretary RE: Proposed Zone Case No. 82-15 and Negative Declaration No. 82-40. Sirs : As I cannot attend the open hearing at 7 pm on October 19th regarding the above issue, I wish to express my opposition to any zone change from what is presently approved. The traffic and congestion are already intolerable due to the close proximity of the high school and civic center and the large number of students who park up and down Main street during the school day. May I reiterate: NO on any zone changes! Yours truly D VID D IAN PERRY THOMAS M. MATSON Homeowner, 1812 Ma4Str Occupant, 1812 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA. 92648 Huntington Beach, CA. 92648 i 91982 Development Services LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CASE NO. 82-15/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 82-40 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, California, for the purpose of considering Zone Case No . 82-15 and Negative Declaration No. 82-40, a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres of property located north of Utica Avenue, between 17th and Lake Streets from R1-0 (Low Density Residential .combined with oil production) and Rl-O-CD (Low Density Residential District combined with oil production within the Civic District) to R2-0-CD (Medium Density Residential District combined with oil pro- duction within the Civic District) . The Planning Commission will also consider Negative Declaration No. 82-40 in conjunction with Zone Case No. 82-15 . A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services. MRS SYEf=ANIE WUERER ��� Q3 � 1 0 � t5•- K:� *HUN i PARE: ST J i_ UNTINGTON BC CA 92648 N✓\ IC r G -- cam'V-e OA ^ � - L Said hearing will be held at the hour of 7: 00 P .M. , on (October 19, 1982 , in the Council Chambers Building of the �vic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invitedtto attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed Zone Case No . 82-15 and Negative Declaration NO. 82-40 Further information may be obtained from the City Planning Department. Telephone No. (714) 536-5271 DATED this 7th day of October, 1982 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION James W. Palin By Secretary lam, �" �,. � /✓ L�l LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CASE NO. 82-15/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 2-40 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, California, for the purpose of considering Zone Case No. 82-15 and Negative Declaration No. ,tea request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres of Jocated north of Utica Avenue, between 17th and Lake St f �' _ (Low Density Residential •combined with oil productio R1- ow Density Residential District combined with 1 rod ct ith e Civic District) to R2-0-CD (Medium Density }�es �'f�fa Districti' +Apm_6�ned with oil pro- duction within the Civic District) . TOP Planning Commission will also consider Negative Declaration No. 82-4 in conjunction with Zone Case No. 82-15 . A .legal description is e in the,Vkepartment of Development Services. _ 9 Development Services Said hearing will be held at the hour of 7: 00 P .M. , on October 19, 1982 , in the Council Chambers Building of the Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invitedtto attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed Zone Case No . 82-1.5 and Negative Declaration NO. 82-40 Further information may be obtained from the City Planning Department. Telephone No. (714) 536-5271 DATED this 7th day of October, 1982 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION James W. Palin By Secretary t� 1� ��..� �.�.�I ks-�� 9_._y t.��=1-G.._o� lea.-ltiesu•,�..�-' lw �'b�-- 4�v� �9- 1�e�J ems-••- k-� � ��k+-.�-��"�_. er 1� (�.e..� C��._ Q C�•�� �-�1�" Cam`-�-- 3, Ug��topma�t Seni� LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CASE NO. 82-15/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 82-40 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, California, for the purpose of considering Zone Case No. 82-15 and Negative Declaration No. 82-40, a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres of property located north of Utica Avenue, between 17th and Lake Streets from R1-0 (Low Density Residential ..combined with oil production) and R1-0-CD (Low Density Residential District combined with oil production within the Civic District) to R2-0-CD (Medium Density Residential District combined with oil pro- duction within the Civic District) . The Planning Commission will also consider Negative Declaration No. 82-40 in conjunction with Zone Case No. 82-15 . A .legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services. I IL � Qom- L t" ems- . Said hearing will be held at the hour of 7: 00 P.M. , on October 19, 1982 , in the Council Chambers Building of the Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invitedl� to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed Zone Case No . 82-1.5 and Negative Declaration NO. 82-40 Further information may be obtained from the City Planning Department. Telephone No. (714) 536-5271 DATED this 7th day of October, 1982 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION James W. Palin By Secretary-�- w . P � G_� eq �o -�- OCT 1 $ 1%2 LEGAL NOTICE Development Services NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CASE NO. 82-15/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 82-40 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, California, for the purpose of considering Zone Case No. 82-15 and Negative Declaration No. 82-40, a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres of property located north of Utica Avenue, between 17th and Lake Streets from R1-0 (Low Density Residential ..combined with oil production) and R1-0-CD (Low Density Residential District combined with oil production within the Civic District) to R2-0-CD (Medium Density Residential District combined with oil pro- duction within the Civic District) . The Planning Commission will also consider Negative Declaration No. 82-40 in conjunction with Zone Case No. 82-15 . A .legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services. cU. a ` Th�� ate.. erlou_ l if it ftgkW wt 0�.�Q. fit: and. - an e{etore- V& OUCr 1b0-h Od 5 WO-3) L.F,ts kaP our au is 4it �n� ` QO_P '' Cv�� o *1�5 au_� _ Ll.�-1,C- UT um W 1 Said hearing will be held at the hour of 7: 00 P .M. , on October 19, 1982 , in the Council Chambers Building of the Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invitedtto attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed Zone Case No . 82-15 and Negative Declaration NO. 82-40 Further information may be obtained from the City Planning 1 Department. Telephone No. (714) 536-5271 DATED this 7th day of October, 1982 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION James W. Palin v1 . By Secretary 53(o 4 �S. I cmn+ lc��FiiED 4C 1 8199 Development Services Oct. 14, 1082 Plenning Commission 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, Calif. Gentelmen; Re : Case #82-15 & Neg. De-blara•tion #82-40 I I am writing this letter to you because I (we) will be un- able to attend your meeting this comming Tuesday evening (Oct . 19) , 4 I wish to express our concern about the effort to rezone the approximately 9 acres of property located north of Utica Ave. between 17th and Lake Streets from Rl-O Qnd R1-0-CD to RP-0-CD. f Among the things that I object to is the Huntington Reach Company saying that if you , the City , will get the zone change we will trade you this other property for it. I dont know what you Gentlemen call it , but I call it BLpCKMAIL.in its ,stmnlest form. What will happen if this is done? well thn f first thing will be that they will sell it to some contractor , a.nd because of the zon -.rivg., will get a. g6od ' price-: For it-. The second thinsr there will be mufitipl°e -dwellings +bu'ilt-,'o&,the property (ur to threeunits on a lot) thus increafki�ng 'the amount of people comnestinF for the space to live, park, thler cars in a space thQt to limited for a, family with a single family home to find a nia,ce to n?.rk thier cars. _ _ Not only that --Have you see the -parking problem created in that area"by.- -the parking of the High School students durin-g the ri nine months• -.oaf •:s-chool every year. And it will be worse if the ' park goes in as plarreddin the lot where the students park now, The property is -zoned Rl-0 and R1-0-90 now and 1 , We, urve you to. keep; it that way now .and in the future. The' Contractor and the Huntington Beach �Company could care less what hanr.ens to the- area after they build and sell the'hunits they x)ut on the property. We , as property owners in this area want it to stay zoned - for single family homes Yours Truly, Mr & Mrs Max L. Fullmer I. LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CASE NO. 82-15 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, :.California, for the purpose of considering Zone Change No. 82-15, a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres of property located north of Utica Avenue,. between 17th and Lake Streets from R1-0 (Low Density Residential combined with oil production) and R1-0-CD (Low Density Residential combined with oil production within Civic District) to R2-0-PD-CD (Medium Density Residential District combined with oil production, Planned Development .Suffix and within Civic District) . The Planning Commission will also consider Negative Declaration No. 82-40 in conjunction with Zone Case No. 82-15. A legal description i on file in the. Departm6 t of velopm nt Services. ,DA �- a �he hour o 7: 00 P.M. on Sai hea"�Utw be held t , November 2, 1982 , in the Council Chambers Building of the Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed Zone Case No. 82-15 Further information may be obtained from the City Planning Department. Telephone No. (714) 536-5271 DATED this 23rd day of October, 1982 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION James W. Palin By Secretary /413. LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CASE NO. 82-15 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, California, for the purpose of considering Zone Change No. 82-15, a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres of property located north of Utica Avenue, . between 17th and Lake Streets from R1-0 (Low Density Residential combined with oil production) and R1-0-CD (Low Density Residential combined with oil production within Civic District) to R2-0-PD-CD (Medium Density Residential District combined with oil production, Planned Development .Suffix and within Civic District) . The Planning Commission will also consider Negative Declaration No. 82-40 in conjunction with Zone Case No. 82-15. A legal descripti n is on file in the Department of Development Services. L � . G Said hearing will be held at the hour of 7: 00 P.M. , on November 2, 1982 , in the Council Chambers Building of the Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed Zone Case No. 82-15 . Further information may be obtained from the City Planning Department. Telephone No. (714) 536-5271 DATED this 23rd day of October, 1982 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION James W. Palin By Secretary LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CASE NO. 82-15 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, :.California, for the purpose of considering Zone Change No. 82-15, a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres of property located north of Utica Avenue, . between 17th and Lake Streets from R1-0 (Low Density Residential combined with oil production) and R1-O-CD (Low Density Residential combined with oil production within Civic District) to R2-0-PD-CD (Medium Density Residential District combined with oil production, Planned Development .Suffix and within Civic District) . The Planning Commission will also consider Negative Declaration No. 82-40 in conjunction with Zone Case No. 82-15. A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services. 0-\13 Said hearing will be held at the hour of 7: 00 P.M. , on November 2, 1982 , in the Council Chambers Building of the Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed Zone Case No. 82-15 Further information may be obtained from the City Planning Department. Telephone No. (714) 536-5271 DATED this 23rd day of October, 1982 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION James W. Palin By Secretary LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CASE NO. 82-15 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, .California, for the purpose of considering Zone Change No. 82-15, a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres of property located north of Utica Avenue, . between 17th and Lake Streets from R1-0 (Low Density Residential combined with oil production) and R1-0-CD (Low Density Residential combined with oil production within Civic District) to R2-0-PD-CD (Medium Density Residential District combined with oil production, Planned Development .Suffix and within Civic District) . The Planning Commission will also consider Negative Declaration No. 82-40 in conjunction with Zone Case No. 82-15. A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services. r GA- � I ut Said hearing will be held at the hour of 7: 00 P.M. , on November 2, 1982 , in the Council Chambers Building of the Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed Zone Case No. 82-15 , Further information may be obtained from the City Planning Department. Telephone No. (714) 536-5271 DATED this 23rd day of October, 1982 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION James W. Palin By Secretary y C C i 2 to 1882 LEGAL NOTICE Development Services NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CASE NO. 82-15 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, California, for the purpose of considering Zone Change No. 82-15, a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres of property located north of Utica Avenue, . between 17th and Lake Streets from R1-0 (Low Density Residential combined with oil production) and R1-0-CD (Low Density Residential combined with oil production within Civic District) to R2-0-PD-CD (Medium Density Residential District combined with oil production, Planned Development .Suffix and within Civic District) . The Planning Commission will also consider Negative Declaration No. 82-40 in conjunction with Zone Case No. 82-15. A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services. l� Said hearing will be held at the hour of 7:00 P .M. , on November 2, 1982 , in the Council Chambers Building of the Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed Zone Case No. 82-15 Further information may be obtained from the City Planning Department. Telephone No. (714) 536-5271 DATED this 23rd day of October, 1982 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION James W. Palin By Secretary i i�TY G 07 1 ,-- 1982 Development Services LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CASE NO. 82-15/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 82-40 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, California, for the purpose of considering Zone Case No. 82-15 and Negative Declaration No. 82-40, a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres of property located north of Utica Avenue, between 17th and Lake Streets from R1-0 (Low Density Residential •combined with oil production) and Rl-0-CD (Low Density Residential District combined with oil production within the Civic District) to R2-0-CD (Medium Density Residential District combined with oil pro- duction within the Civic District) . The Planning Commission will also consider Negative Declaration No. 82-40 in conjunction with Zone Case No_ 82-15. A .legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services. tom, zee� Said hearing will be held at the hour : 00 P .M. , on October 19, 1982 , in the C ncil Chambers Building of the Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invitedtto attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed Zone Case No . 82-1.5 and Negative Declaration NO. 82-40 Further information may be obtained from the City Planning Department. Telephone No. (714) 536-5271 DATED this 7th day of October, 1982 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION James W. Palin By Secretary LC; ; 1982 Development Services LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CASE NO. 82-15/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 82-40 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, California, for the purpose of considering Zone Case No. 82-15 and Negative Declaration No. 82-40, a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres of property located north of Utica Avenue, between 17th and Lake Streets from R1-0 (Low Density Residential . combined with oil production) and Rl-O-CD (Low Density Residential District combined with oil production within the Civic District) to R2-0-CD (Medium Density Residential District combined with oil pro- duction within the Civic District) . The Planning Commission will also consider Negative Declaration No. 82-40 in conjunction with Zone Case No. 82-15 . A .legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services. �s ,/-� /7r-�i�i 5��--. /`�v rye=u U✓.�c'� � �� ✓�4��v� �z y- C Said hearing will be held at the hour of 7: 00 P .M. , on October 19, 1982 , in the Council Chambers Building of the Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invitedtto attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed Zone Case No . 82-15 and Negative Declaration NO. 82-40 Further information may be obtained from the City Planning Department. Telephone No. (714) 536-5271 DATED this 7th day of October, 1982 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION James W. Palin By Secretary CU 37 1 = 1982 Development Services LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CASE NO. 82-15/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 82-40 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, California, for the purpose of considering Zone Case No. 82-15 and Negative Declaration No. 82-40, a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres of property located north of Utica Avenue, between 17th and Lake Streets from R1-0 (Low Density Residential . combined with oil production) and R1-0-CD (Low Density Residential District combined with oil production within the Civic District) to R2-0-CD (Medium Density Residential District combined with oil pro- duction within the Civic District) . The Planning Commission will also consider Negative Declaration No. 82-40 in conjunction with Zone Case No. 82-15 . A .legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services. Said hearing will be held at the hour of 7: 00 P .M. , on October 19, 1982 , in the Council Chambers Building of the Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invitedtto attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed Zone Case No . 82-15 and Negative Declaration NO. 82-40 Further information may be obtained from the City Planning Department. Telephone No. (714) 536-5271 DATED this 7th day of October, 1982 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION James W. Palin By Secretary 1 C C! -� �1 1982 LEGAL NOTICE Development Services NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CASE NO. 82-15/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 82-40 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, California, for the purpose of considering Zone Case No. 82-15 and Negative Declaration No. 82-40, a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres of property located north of Utica Avenue, between 17th and Lake Streets from R1-0 (Low Density Residential . combined with oil production) and Rl-O-CD (Low Density Residential District combined with oil production within the Civic District) to R2-0-CD (Medium Density Residential District combined with oil pro- duction within the Civic District) . The Planning Commission will also consider Negative Declaration No. 82-40 in conjunction with Zone Case No. 82-15 . A .legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services. Said hearing will be held at the hour of 7: 00 P .M. , on October 19, 1982 , in the Council Chambers Building of the Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invitedtto attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed Zone Case No . 82-15 and Negative Declaration NO. 82-40 Further information may be obtained from the City Planning Department. Telephone No. (714) 536-5271 DATED this 7th day of October, 1982 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION James W. Palin By Secretary COT 1 1982 LEGAL NOTICE Development Services NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CASE NO. 82-15/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 82-40 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, California, for the purpose of considering Zone Case No . 82-15 and Negative Declaration No. 82-40, a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres of property located north of Utica Avenue, between 17th and Lake Streets from R1-0 (Low Density Residential .combined with oil production) and Rl-0-CD (Low Density Residential District combined with oil production within the Civic District) to R2-0-CD (Medium Density Residential District combined with oil pro- duction within the Civic District) . The Planning Commission will also consider Negative Declaration No. 82-40 in conjunction with Zone Case No. 82-15 . A .legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services. Said hearing will be held at the hour of 7: 0. 0 P .M. , on October 19, 1982 , in the Council Chambers Building of the Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invitedtto attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed Zone Case No . 82-15 and Negative Declaration NO. 82-40 Further information may be obtained from the City Planning Department. Telephone No. (714) 536-5271 DATED this 7th day of October, 1982 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION James W. Palin By Secretary a �� LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CASE NO. 82-15 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, :. California, for the purpose of considering Zone Change No. 82-15, a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres of property located north of Utica Avenue,. between 17th and Lake Streets from R1-0 (Low Density Residential combined with oil production) and Rl-O-CD (Low Density Residential combined with oil production within Civic District) to R2-0-PD-CD (Medium Density Residential District combined with oil,production, Planned Development .Suffix and within Civic District) . The Planning Commission will also consider Negative Declaration No. 82-40 in conjunction with Zone Case No. 82-15. A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services. Said hearing will be held at t`�hour of 7z00 P.M. , on November 2, 1982 , in the Council Chambers Building of the Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed Zone Case No. 82-15 . Further information may be obtained from the City Planning Department. Telephone No. (714) 536-5271 DATED this 23rd day of October, 1982 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION James W. Palin By Secretary ' 1 Publish 11-18-82 /2/t1/Y 3 4510e_t� NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING �. �. OK I2e'k APPEAL TO THE PC DENIAL OF ZONE CASE 82-15 e.Ak�-js 4 6PA A- 2/.' NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible on Monday the —§ h _ day of December , 19--U. for the purpose of considering an appeal filed by Councilman Pattinson to the denial of a request to change the zoning on approximately 9 acres of property located north of Utica Avenue, between 17th and Lake Streets from R1-0 (Low Density Residential combined with oil production) and R1-0-CD (Low Density Residential combined with oil production within Civic District) to R2-0-PD-CD (Medium Density Residential District combined with oil production, Planned Development Suffix and within Civic District). The City Council will also consider Negative Declaration No. 82-40 in conjunction with Zone Case No. 82-15. A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services. AS EXPRESPRESSED BEFORE - CHANGING THE ZONING IN THE INVOLVED AREA 'HILL ONLY INCREASE THE PARKING AND TRAFFIC PROBLEMS ALREADY OUT OF HAND. NO GOOD REASONABLE REASON FOR THE CHANGING OF THE PRESENT ZONING HAS BEEN. PRESENTED. HONfEVER 17E_ ALL KNQVN:.WHAT_THE_UNDERLYING REASON.FOR,IT_.IS - AND,THAT THE COUiNICILMAN APPEALING THE PRIOR DENIAL HAS HIS OWN REASONS FOR WANTING THE CHANG APPROVED. THE AREA IS ALL (R-1) NOW, AND SHOULB BE KEPT THAT WAY TO PRESERVE THE PRESENT CONDITIONS. AND HAS; AN ENVIORMENTAL I]l1PACT REPORT BEEN FILLED WITH THE CITY BY THE PARTIES: RUESTING THE CHANGE???? I BELIEVE THIS SHOULD BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONSIDERATION OF THE CHANGE IN ZONING. M. 0. REMINGTON, 219 WEST UTICA, HUNTINGTON BEACH 92648 All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said appeal and Negative Declaration No. 82-40 Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach. California. 92648 - (714) 536-5227 DATED 11-18-82 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk 1_ f AGREEMENT PORTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSIO14 ON JUNE 28, 1982 CWT: For the last several weeks , in fact, I guess I could almost say months, we have been in discussions with the developers, the Huntington Beach Company or representatives of Mansion Properties in regard to this development as well as the corridor area, and in addition, properties to the south of the City Hall complex. These - all of these particular areas have a bearing on this, in that this development overlaps the corridor area about which there has been a great deal of discussion for, I understand, the last several years. In order to try to resolve this rather complicated and knotty issue - and an issue which has taken an inordinate amount of staff time as well as Council and Planning Commission time - have been meeting with the Huntington Beach Company hoping to put this to rest and proceed with the overall development, if that could be done within the public interest. And I believe we have an agreement or an arrangement which could develop into that, provided it meets with the approval of the Council. First of all, I guess I should address the development here. It is recognized that there are certain needs for a revision of this plan (on the 2.1ansion Property) and the developer is in accord with an arrangement to redo the development area in accordance with standards which could be approved by the Development Services Dept. and the Planning Commission. So they are in accord with redoing the plan which you have just seen on the board. Secondly, with regard to the corridor area, I will talk about three different sections of the corridor. . two of them can be addressed together. Those would be the one section lying north of Clay Street up to Garfield, and the second being all of the corridor area south of Yorktown to, I believe, it is Elmira. Those entire areas, speaking of both of them, would be, in this overall arrangement, deeded to the City. That is all interest and rights of the Huntington Beach Company or Mansion Properties would be turned over - whatever interest they hold in that property. They have indicated that they would be willing to show us and provide us a copy of a deed to portions of this property which they have from the Southern Pacific Railroad and whatever rights they possess to all of those areas would then become under the control of the City. Secondly, the portion of the corridor lying between Yorktown and Clay, which would be a part of this development. . . the City would release whatever rights of easement that it may have to that corridor with the stipulation that in the new development plan, there would be a 40 foot wide corridor left through the development on which there would be no structures . It could be used for landscaping, it could be used for open space, it could Page 2 • be used for parking, but it would be left open. In the event that at some future date the corridor would have to be used, there would be at least the practical possibility that it could be obtained without removing any struc- tures. So the City would give up any easement rights which it holds to that section and would also vacate any of the streets in there, which are paper streets within that same area. In addition to that, the corridor also, of course, runs down south of Yorktown and that would be deeded to the City and, in addition, we would attempt what I will refer to as a consolidation of the properties around City Hall here and we have two maps , one in back of the Mayor between you and Vice Mayor MacAllister, and another over here behind Mrs . Bailey and to the right of Mrs. Finley and Mr. Kelly. These two maps indicate the arrangement for this particular property. Now what it involves is the vacation of the southerly portion of 17th Street as it inter- I sects Utica and Main and the northern portion where is now located a cul- de-sac. It also would include the vacation of a portion of Pine Street running from 17th to Utica. There is an existing right-of-way width for 17th Street on the portion that would remain - there is now a right-of-way width of 70+ feet. Approximately 60 feet is all that would be needed in order to maintain the parking and keep two lanes of traffic, one in either direction. That would allow a small strip of that also to be vacated on the condition that the development plan of that area did not take access out onto that portion of 17th. In other words , it would be a walled area (along 17th Street) with no access. Now this would contemplate or require that there be a new access point built by the City from 17th at that point out to Main Street, which would then serve as the access to the Police De- partment - an ingress-egress point and back to the City parking lot from that direction, and of course the northern entrance off of Yorktown would remain as it is. This also would require the deeding of that small portion around the City' s oil well north of the cul-de-sac area into that parcel , leaving the area with the well and the area around the well, in the owner- ship of the City. Deeded to the City would be the area as shown within the blue boundary south of 17th, which is about an acre and a quarter, is that right, Jim? JWP: The white triangle portion was . 85, including the street, but I do not recall exactly - would be slightly over an acre. CWT: This, in accordance with a letter which I have forwarded to you - but that light area there in the blue border on that map would show the new City ownership. The portion in the orange border would then be the consolidated portion of the H.B. Company, or Mansion Properties , however, that is :y - u-., �._•,►:.-._.-- .n�..�.rr-:.. .. ..n•arre.u.»w.• _ r:w.n•. - - •.,...a,ra,a r s+a. Page 3 decided. In addition to this, City would then accept that acre and a half in lieu of park fees, plus there would be then another consideration re- ceived. It is 1. 1? The total would be a little over one acre, 1. 15 in that white section south of 17th. In addition, there would be another consider- ation, which would be made by Mansion Properties to the City. They would make a $30 ,000 donation to the City, which would be outside of this partic- ular arrangement. Taken together, this would constitute a plan which would, (1) allow for the development and consolidation of the property around City Hall, (2) it would provide for ownership by the City of the corridor, (3) it would provide a means by which the City could eventually develop the corridor if that was ever shown to be a necessity, and (4) it would provide a means of going ahead with the development of the Mansion property (the Ranch) . Now what we would need at this point would be whether or not, under the terms as I have described and which are contained in the letters which I have for- warded to you, whether they do constitute a program which is acceptable to the City Council. If it is , then we can proceed and put this whole matter to rest. If it is not, we will take some other approach. Mandic: Are we still in the public hearing? I think it would be more ap- propriate to finish the public hearing and discuss this after that fact. At this time we will. . . Bailey: I am wondering if the public has been aware of the information that has just been given to us? Has the public had it? I do know that the hear- ing as it now stands would be only on the plan as it had been represented to the Planning Commission. Did that not include this information? Can they speak on it at this point? Mandic: They can speak to this issue, but I am not sure do we actually tie this in to a project? CWT: The portions that I understand are actually a part of the public hear- ing per se is that portion really reflecting the Mansion development between Yorktown and Clay. Actually, as far as I know, there is no public hearing required on the remainder of it. The corridor has been an issue for many years , but as far as I know there is actually no public hearing required on that unless you would prefer to have a public hearing. Legally, I believe there would be no requirement (of a public hearing) to accept a deed. Kelly: We are the governing body and I think we can revise it in any way we want and that is a final action and we do not have to submit it back to the Planning Commission. We can revise it either with or without this amendment in it. Mandic : We can approve this at different time? I do not think so. It will take a major reconfiguration of this whole project . CWT: do not believe we need any Council action on the subdivision. - ;development of the Mansion properties other than the fact that it will go back to the Planning Commission, isn ' t that correct? JWP : Yes . It was anticipated that that would be referred back to the Commission with the concurrence of the developer. Maybe Art could address that. There may not be time limitations on appeals; however, there are on maps a mandatory processing and approval dates . They are requesting that it go back to the Planning Commission for resolution of the rev ised site plan. Folger: If the applicant concurs with going back , they he would be waiving the right to the mandatory time, but we would need the concurrenct of the applicant. " Bailey : I do not believe I got an answer to my question on whether or not the public is aware of the agreement with the Huntington Beach Company as you are proposing . CWT: No. There has been no public hearing on it. This is my first report to the Council, other then the correspondence which I have forwarded to you over the last few weeks . Mandic : When it comes back to you it will have to go through a public hearing process for approval. CWT: I do not believe the acceptance of a deed to the corridor is in- volved in that directly? Nor the property here at the Civic Center; We need to know the attitude of the Council as to whether what we have done, what I have done, is acceptable . We need some time to decide on these issues' and get something done . It seems to me that this is the time to do it. MacAllister : We are talking apples and oranges . We are looking at a concept. They are already saying they are going to redo this map, but the primary thing we want to look at is the acceptance of this corridor . Question is do we concur with that and the other things out- side of that area that they are willing to do to get to the point of negotiation where we are . But we are not approving a map tonight, because that all has to go through the process . liave its public hearing . All we are looking at is whether or not to send this back with these letters to put together into a final report and come back to us as a final item some time in the future, and' I see no problem with that because we are not putting it into concrete as far as the layout or development of that area . Kelly: The think that held us up for so long was the right-of-way. Nveh J . • M though the Planning Commission did not say specifically that is what it is all about. They did not agree with the plan because it iterrupts or inter- feres with the corridor . Staff is asking us if this is acceptable for the corridor, more than anything else . If it is , we send it back . If it is not, we get back on he drawing board again . Commission did. not actually say the corridor, but that was the big thing . Mandic : In concept I like the idea . A couple of things in that letter I am concerned about, and I am not sure how close we are tied in. One thing we would be admitting that they own it, which we really have not decided one way or the other . Secondly, as a compromise I would accept that, possibly, but the other thing, there is no setbacks from that 40 feet, and. I am not sure if that should be a. requirement. It ties us strictly to a 40-foot width in there and they would build buildings right up to the 40 ffet . And that is what I was a little bit concerned about . Mow closely tied in will we be? If it is in concept and we say "Yes , we have an agreement" and this - that is not "in concept" and it is set in concrete? CWT: First of all, yes , I believe that you would get buildings up to that line. However , I think that there are a few cases along the other protions of that corridor where you have the same identical situation, perhaps not to the same degree, but there are instances of that of outbuild- ings in another part of the corridor, so that would not be unusual . You would still have the 40 foot width available there in the event that it was required for a public purpose and that certainly is much wider than would fully be utilized by any kind of a #rail system that might conceivably be put in . So that the 40 feet would be an outside parameter, just as a street width. Now, the other part of it as indicated , the corridor was a factor and perhaps a major factor with reference to questions that have come up with regard to development of that area . Secondly, if we have been wishing or- wanting or desiring to have .an area that could be developed as a community center, this would then allow us to develop that particular improvement if and when the. City Council chose to do so and we would have a place fob it. So also the amount of property that the City would come under City ownership is worth on a market basis well in excess of the amount of money that would be waived in regard to the park fees . Mandic: I would like to get this public hearing over with first thing. We. are getting too far away from it. At this time continue the public hearing on the appeal of the denial . Linda Moon, Dick Harlow, and Dean Albright then spoke to the Council . . Linda on equestrian trails . Harlow: Speaking as representative of the applicants . I think Mr . T. i outlined the compromise proposal that-, was worked out . Huntington Beach � i Company does support the proposal . This thing started with the TT that was first filed south of Yorktown on Lake . This compromise keeps your options open. It provides for a green space through the center of the Ranch property if that eventuality comes about, but it also leaves the option to use the Main Street alignment as well . It is a compromise and it does accomplish .waht we believe was the initial objective . Insofar as the Company is con- cerned, if they do go back for a resubmittal to the Commission, we need some basic guidelines as to how thin new plan should be designed . If they go back with the same presumptions that they had initially (about ownership, which he said in an aside that the Company does hold) If they go back with the same preseumptions then we have probably wasted another year . we want to set the. ground rules so that we can get around to planning the development of the property and accomplishing your goals at the same time . Finley: You are saying that the Company is seeking to have the ground rules set according to the corridor? You are not asking us to redeisgn the plan? Harlow: No. Just set the constraints . Finley : Other question. The Transit District' s preference for the Main Street alignment. You are not talking the Beach Blvd . corridor? Harlow: Transportation Commission staff and several of the Commission member (I am not speaking on behalf- of the Commission, you understand) but they have expressed a preference to the Beach alignment. MacAllister : In .regard to the letters that have gone back and forth. Mansion Properties is in agreement with the latest letters? Harlow: Yes . That is correct. Albright: Spoke about need for transportation corridor and impgrtance of preserving it. Mandic : Closed the public hearing. Mac A: I think Mr. Albright just said the whole thing and what has been negotiated here is the preservation of this corridor for that time when it comes about that there is a rapid transit system that would make Sense for the whole City. That we are putting that as a central condition, that we support the latest compromise that has been worked out with the Mansion Properties is that we will. be providing this 40 foot right-of-way through ther- so that when the time comes rather than having buildings on it and losing it forever, that that could be done . Also , by them deeding over the property that is north and south there to us , also puts the onus on the City for. its preservation, if that . is the majority of the Cojncil feeling. So I have no problems with the compromise that has been worked out and can support the direction that has been worked out by our City Administrator . I could support directing Planning Commission and staff_ to work out with the overlays that the administrator has negotiated into bring back a final map. Kelly: First of all I would like to see . . . No. 1 , the City staff and the applicant ' s capabilities of contributing engineering ideas . I think you have donw a hell of a job and for that I congratulate you . There are some questions, particularly, Linda made one regarding use of an equestrian trail through there. I do not think we know what the hell that right-of-way is really going to be used for at this point. We are just struggling. We have worked like the dickens and I think this is getting darn close to what would be a viable compromise and I do not care where public transporta- tion for the masses, so to sepak, whether is it on Beach or where it may be located , because I do not think that the Transportation Commission has a good finger .on that yet . I would like to comment, However . We have got a 40-foot strip of right-of-way and Bob brought up an interesting situation which had not crossed my mind in terms of the setbacks . Because as far as I am concerned I am not screwing around with that. I want to see that being a right-owa-way to be utilized at some point in the future, which is the only reason for this thing being a hangup to begin with. If we are intending to permit the Company or the developer to put parking on that in any temporary fashion, then I want to make sure that that parking is well over and beyond the required ordinance parking that must be available for that type of development. Becaur.e I do not want to go into that darn thing or I take that back, to to in there an try to take advantage of that right-of- way and all of a sudden we find out that, "well , hell , I only bought my house , because we could park in that right-of-way': I know that sounds facetious, but if that thing is not ironed out so that is 40 feet that is to be utilized by the City when it gets involved with an appraisal under the state-of-the-art to what we can do with that trail when we feel it is needed to u%ilize it. So let' s not slice hairs here on that - THAT 40 FEET INVIOLATE If you want to allow parking on it, Mr . Palin, it better be way over what `isr., required by the laws and ordinance of this City, because if we put parking on there now there is totally no way for a continuity in terms of what the. right-of-way means, if it is a parking lot on that thing . We are making an effort to protect a right-of-way for the users of this City in the future and let ' s not get away from that fact, sir, if you do not mind . As I see 'it.,,: has got to be inviolate . Setback could be something that we should follow through on. We do have setback problems that well , how much is a City street? CWT: Normally 50 feet to 60 . However , if this were being contemplated as a rail line certainly 40 feet is very ample. . Kelly : My whole attitude for 2 years has been to protect that . I am not questioning the ownership; I appreciate your resolve up to this moment, but I do not like to hear that it can be used for parking . I do not think that is what we had in mind. Thank you . Bailey: Jack, I didn ' t hear that. I got the impression that it was going to be recreation green sapce, but that could be brought about when I it comes back to us . I really feel that you have reached a reasonable com- promise and I think that the City is gaining from what we are trying to do. to preserve the corridor . My only concern is that we will have to maintain it, and we need to think about that, and for waht purpose . And there are some things to be said for equestrian and some things to be said against it . but I do feel as far as this project is concerned that if indeed we go along with the concept of this agreement, I would like when it goes through the process so that the public. is able to respond to it. Finley: Jim, the public interests in this negotiation . What public hear- ings do you visualize as a result of this type of agreement? JWP : As previously directed by the Council , we will have to get into an amendment to the Circulation Element . I do not believe that we are going to have to set any precise plans - I believe that with the accep- tance of the quit claims or grant deeds on those areas that would be suffi- . cient and we do not have to necessarily precise .plan the alignment between Garfield and Clay -and Yorktown south. If we get into a design element in the future as to the use for the area - possible trail - and could possibly be public hearings on the trails implementation plan . 'there will be public hearings on the C.U. P . and TT maps when it has been revised back to the Planning Commission . So those are certainly all public hearings that would be involved . Those would not, however, I do not believe that those would . actually hold up the context that we are working on in this negotiation, in� that C'-J.-, Co,-ncil could instruct staff to net sta.rL-cd on the vacation proceedings of the streets t,,) the so ,th . Those would be public hearings . It is a policy that the Council has on notifying surrounding property owners of street vacations . But we would not have to get into any type of amending the circulation element or any trails to do that . Finley : You are saying that there could be, as this preparation goes on here, on the other aspects of this? JWP : Yes . Finley : So that it would not be something that we act on and then find it t' • 0 back to haunt us . JWP_ I do not believe I understand thoroughly . . . Finley: I am expressing public concern over vacation of streets that we ' are talking of doing here today and what that could mean. CWT: Good point. The only streets that are talking of being vacated there are in the Mansion properties itself and Pine Street. The only owner is the owner with whom we are discussing this matter . The only access is to the City parking lot, so there is really no public consequence that I am aware of . Now in addition to that, it is understood that in the development of that property that there will be a means for emergency purposes in order to get to 17th via either Lake or Utica . That would be for emergency reasons only and probably would never have to be actually utilized by the City would allow a long-term kind of extra precaution in the event that both 17th and Main and Yorktown would be closed at the same time for some reason or other. Also, I would just like to express the goal or objec- tive that I was trying to achieve . That is to preserve the public option and not burn that bridge behind us, and I believe we have done that, because we do not know what will happen in 10, 15 , or 20 years down the line. So I believe that public option is left open to us by way of this kind of agree- ment . Pattinson: Many years ago before any of you were on the Council , the Council at that time said "maintain the corridor if economically feasible. " Now I would venture to say if we were to try to buy it it would not be economically feasible . This is a good kind of compromise. It is not straight through like we wanted, but I think it is a good compromise and I think we should go along with it. Kelly: I would just want to give Mrs . Finley a little more room - I know you brought up the internal inside the boundary situation on the, vacation of streets . Finley : I am concerned at some point that we address this in terms of circulation and not all of a sudden find that we may have problems . Not talking about the Ranch now, I am talking aobut the segments of: this negotiation as they fall into place . When you discussed this, did you dis- cuss this also with that part of our staff that is concerned about circula-.�, . tion, such as fire and Police and Public Works? CWT: I believe I discussed the agreement we were working on with the entire staff . I:ay, did I discuss it with you? I guess I tal :<ed to Cook and Pali.n . I thought I brought it up at staff meeting, Ray . Picard . Yes . In terms of 17th . . (voice not really audible) Mandic: You are talking about access to . . . ? lo .• . 0 Finley: I am concerned that we will negotiate in terms of what I see here, and that we will find ourselves facing something that parts of our staff will say is not desirable . I have seen it happen. On paper it looks great and it looks like a good compromise, but from a planning standpoint down the line I do not want to find that we have made a mistake. Mandic : One of the main conditions that we are compromising on is this dedication and what She is saying that once the project is approved and three or four, years from now we find ourselves that we cannot do it. We have given away the shop and we have got nothing in return. That is waht she is referring to basically - do you understand? CWT: No, I am not sure that I do . Because the only difference as I see it is that we presently have access on Yorktown which we would retain - we presently have a rather difficult access into the Main and Utica intersection which we would replace . the development plan for the prop- erty would call. for an emergency possibility for ingress here from Utica or Lake Street, which would replace for emergency purposes Pine Street. Now, conceivably the development of the property there in the corner of Main and Utica as a community center - you could actually even have another entrance off Utica if that was felt to be desirable or necessary . So you would have entrace from Main , Utica , emergency from Lake or Utica , and from Yorktown . On that basis, I do not know what other kind of access you could get. Finley: I think I am running scared because we have loused this whole area up so badly over the years . It has been terrible and it just scares me to be in a negotiation process that may commit us into a pattern that will not be workable. Picard : So long as we have some circulation for whatever that project is . Pine has no value, 17th has no v d.tie so long as we hive access into City Hall and the project. Either 17th or Pine is irrelevant as far as Fire Department is concerned . Mandic : We have seen Yorktown taking a crazy curve - we have seen 17th deadended which is the screwiest thing I have ever seen (more along this line - did not take it all down) . The concern is that we will further impact this screwy area . We want to make sure we don' t. CWT: That can be recouped if you will look at the north end of Main and to the configuration of Main and 17th. That could be recouped, but 17th is lost cause . Mandic : We will make the front door to City Hall an alley. CWT: I am well aware of those kinds of things . Certainly, I think that one of the best approaches if to try to preserve as many options as we can and that is why we are trying to get control of the corridor, which we do not have now. Mandic : I will recognize three more lights . Kel_Y: The reason I went back to see what Mrs . Finley had in mind on the roadway system - I wanted to make a comment originally without seeming to rebuff what you are trying to go for, and we have got a little bit away from the gist of this decision issue . We are thinking about the terms that Mr . T and the applicant came to as far as potential compromise. And . I think that is where the motion is located . If we concentrated on that in- stead of trying to work out some other elements of this plan we could get this thing off the desk and move it along . Mandic : I appreciate the effort . It has come a long ways and is almost acceptable . But I have concerns with the setbacks . You mention along the corridors some (building) exists . Those are ancient buildings; everything new has setbacks, alleys , and garages . There are no buildings approved in the last 5 years touching on the corridor . There is a built-in setback factor and I am not sure . . . I would like to see some type of ability to keep the corridor a straight line or with 2 or 3 degree curve. Straight line . Secondly, easement factor . At least 10 feet, and I do not care if they put a parking lot on it. Potentially if we use it they can make changes . I cannot see any lakes being built on it, but I could see parking with a 10 foot setback. If we do approve this in concept are we locking ourselves into these particular issues as written down on this letter? I have no problem sending this back with certain guidelines based on the information you hammered out, but I am not sure it will be acceptable to Mansion properties (if we amend it) . • CWT: All the points that I have made have been put in writing and accepted by Mansion. That did not include the setback. What we addressed was 40 feet ofunincumbered or unfettered kind of property on which there wou,ld. be no building or structur6 . I would agree, although it was not specified , that that would have to include water , but I did not discuss that point with Mansion Properties . It did not come up, but I would agree that it should not include waterways . I do not necessarily see the* n �cessity for additional setback from the 40 feet iE. it were to be used as a rail system, because 40 feet would be ample. So I do not see the necessity from that point of view for an additional amount. Mandic : Maybe some mitigating measures in the construction of those units, possibly . CWT: I would have to say that I would have a hard time if , saying that corridor as a rail area, because it just is not practical .in any' terminology that I can foresee. Now that does not mean: to say that it will not happen and I have tried to maintain the options open for the public if that were to be the case. Cost of rail to install is so great and the requirements for passenger ridership and the terminal points are so vital that they have not been able to get one on the Wilshire Corridor yet, let alone in Huntington Beach. I see rail as a very, very far fetched possibility, but at least we would be preserving that option open to the public if it were to come to pass . Mandic : In this letter dated June 16, 1982 on obligation of Mansion, Item 2, "developer could place permanent structures to the boundary line and no setbacks would be required . " I am not sure under what legal way they could hold us to this thing if we approve it tonight CWT: I guess If you could indicate that the terms which have been out- lined - we would have to depend on the integrity of this City Council to mean what it says and I would accept that. Mandic: All the conditions as written in this letter? CWT: Right . Outlined in the correspondence which you have here this evening . Mandic : Whole thing is - it is a one-sided agreement. If we add to it and they do not agree, I cannot see it. I have got some problems with it. Bailey: At this .point if you want to try to make an amendment to the agreement put it on the floor and see what happens . Mandic : Motion for an amendment of the agreement that on the 40 foot corridor it be kept in a straight .line and minimum of 10 foot setback on either side by required if necessary by the Planning ,Commission, No second. MacAllister : I think that the letters back and forth here set forth a reasonble compromise and I would so move that these letters. be incorporated into our motion and direct back through the Planning Com- ' mission and staff that they work with the developer to come back with the- appropriate documentation that sets all of this in a legal, binding manner , Seconded but could not recognize the voice (see minutes) . ` Kelly_ Recap in terms of some of the concerns . 2 to 3 degree is almost a straight line and there may be some problems of land which would need it. But we are working with an applicant here who I think has proven over and over again , regardless of what kind of blood is let on the nego- ' 13 . I. tiating table, that they provide this community with good developments. ! Mandic : Is that enough to take care of the requirements? Finley: You want a motion now sending this back . Folger: You got to deny the appeal . ACTION THEN TAKEN ON THE RANCH PROJECT PER THE MINUTES PREPARED BY CITY CLERK. :df --------------------------------------