HomeMy WebLinkAboutZone case 84-10 - Lindborg-Dahl - West of Magnolia St and no 121 Zone Changes 2C 84-10 - See ZC 84-9
I
I
1 -
r'ulTf)► {e0 10 >'u1� Sm Aaverli�amanl� 0-1(36 I^UuC�n; LvOK t ACN tc tolfl.,"
nc1Ces by Gec►ea of lnr Su,e► cr Cc„ri o� 7•3r,ge �.ounrr -+ -- ••w..
ra+r< n ar A.62'• Oa1e0 29 5ap1qq'"hoe 19bt Alma W�dU 'fR)SkC,'�T
Carta . ti u t:
A•24831, OAliad 11 June 1963 ItiJ.• �:-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA laxEN aty�t�e �
4 W iM CIA Ty G!iiv1rt:.l Iao,
i i «ycA,'''3rf .Iris 7cour�cl$
County of Oraniro +.o i. .c.ar�.+•p �..«.�,
j e• ;%J A-4100 1 i•+ + pp., I �.'i r!T(jlt,' Dr,'{10.' CfY(G
Co..~
la1.114 tx%rr C4 7.ht`Plr! a
L------- ------- �A}ebnm t�ursaltex.ar C��e•
1 am a Citizen of the United States and 3 resident of W�orn�r• {aC�•�bttrpa
the County aforesaid, I am over the ag,i of eighteen 1�Mtden�trd�+art{°i'"
�s.-w•.liars _E?a�nr:c r,t.,e �
years. and not a party to or interested in the below �a1:*�a AAICUKt:c.2kcri
lra�rt,.r1&,it•ncac0 f4god
7ana•456."1•a-c
entitled matron. I am a principal clerk of the Crange ttw+►'CAM t•r.so,hoot if.,
Coast DAILY PILOT. with which is combined th- ;,Ju e2 :,�.; g�
NEWS-PRESS, a newspaper of general circulation, I%VV-W"G -'--F60,•s•una tss.
-._-
Arts.,Q2:• ACd"s :Y
printed and published in the City of Cc sta Mosa. �� ;1ts+�-a s-te 1'>•, tam ute
County ct Orange, State of California. a 'a !hat a \\� ���f•�:y" Mrs
Land Use Elamar.t ca�!Y+tlipui
rA)IJL-!dt t fKn
Notice of an>I }.�' : ar+•sao��!b
4.45 iris {XftM.%%Jdt of
ttuiss'I;',QCv,f'a4r'wars•, of
of wt'Icn copy attacnea hereto is a true Ind complete ` w"r��L.QQ' -g*to-Sato w:s&'*
copy, was printed and published in the Costa Mesa, v�
y �� �tQJ >'pc1te14.wa41,4ti�
Nowport Beacn, Hunting:-in k►+:t�n Beach. Fountain Valley.
�� !Wale 1e1°
/7t�q tygt•�rrtt.;t l
Irvine, the South Coast communities and Laguna �V """r,
� �p M.
Beach issues of said newspaper for title w a*14%;,�
pirtrs.t rem
Ve`—iialis4 sinr
R"RriXCr, ta&"o wit th@ rSSutj(5) Of +L honsr�F�3lQw.�+attt
J Prtf 11 461>'tiCt1.1a fit
�
Woc. eo Itivwy Ffwj.� tlMlat tiist15c:7 � ,.,
�tbl'),I�,t�,r,�scr,x�
j '
26 198_a_ k>ae>tn at: t e>ls�v,�1�
(7al_�.p�T`Ifrr�"�6�wy'+pq'r-ZIK,►:
"tl:I tt!ill!,�•�
hi��12-aR r'am
,'0�•tt �-w 2 N
s+hkut,�`c4+rR�utl�i �p�;t1
`� `"j ' ,^Sorcrl4o�i,rtcuthe�lii
.pttoi�:4 - �
V( •�..IT xt iC •
�v Ir> •s7ait all
t
I declare, under penalty of perjury, that thefrky
foregoing is true and correct. IV*I
October 26 4 ro vet th
Executed on . , 98 ._._. r "
.' at+'!ti r 6 f
at Costa Mes , California.
Signature
-I�e •
00ii MW'►
t
� � f rC1h'��1t�'�tWl'Filit#r'rW
' ` .� PROOF OF PUBLICATION �����
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Date G.tohcz -- �;iG1L
Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council l %pr7,13 n 'q
Submi"ed by: Charles W. Thompson , City Adminis
Prepared by: James W. Palin, Director , Cevelopm mt-et<1*vice
Subject: ZONE CHANGE NO. 84-10 (IN CONJUNCTION WITH LAND USE
ELEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 84-2 , AREA 3 . 2)
we W. C�1;
Ozo. aq-4 0
Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachnwnts:t`� t
STATEMENT OF ISSUE.s
Transmitted for your consideration is Zone Change No. 64-10 , a
request by Lindborg-Dahl.-H"lscher/Guggentseim to rezone
approximately 7 . 11 acres of property from (Q) R5 (Qualified Office
Profesnlonalj to R3 (Medium High Density Residential) and 3 .29 acres
of property from (C) R5 to Nl-A ( Restricted Manufacturing ) . The
subject property is located on the west side of Magnolia Street
approximately 450 feet north of Warner Avenue ,
PLANNING COMMISSION AC^ION AND REV)MMENDATION:
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the zone change
request on 4:;tober 16 , 19p4 .
On motion by Livengood and s Econd by Higgins Zone Change No. 84-10
was approved to (0) R3 and (0) MI-A with the following condi tiono on
the "Q", and recosrmended to the City Council for adoption by the
following vote:
AYES: Biggins , Winchell , Livengood, Porter , Erskine ,
Schumacher , Ki r jafiang i.r
F None
1-114'T: hone
,.,�STAIN s None
I
Conditions on "0" :
i . Any future development will be :subject to approval of a
Conditional Use Perim t by the Planning Commission.
2 . At the time of development the project s;ball be required . to
cover t;,:e. flood control channel between Magnolia Street and
Warner Avenues. 1
3 . The proposed project shall be designed and laved out to be
compatible with the adjacent` si rigle family residential. . tract
to the wee t.
r�CIO
Flo 4181
a. The project entrance off Magnolia Street shall be designed to
City standards and compatible with the adjacent commercial
center to the south .
r . The project shalt address the closure of Conner Drive to the
satisfaction of the City' s Fire Department.
6 . The area zoned M1--A shall he limited to mini-storage uses .
FINDI'NGS:
1 . The R3 and Dll-A zoning would be consistent wi th the Mixed Use
designation in Land Use Element Amendment No . 84-2. .
2 . Rezoning the site to accomroda to apartments and
mini--warehouses would be compatible with surrOL.nd.ing land
uses .
STAFF RECOMMELIDATION:
Staff is recommending denial of Area 3 .2 .:f Land Use Element
Amendment No. 83-2 . As such , staff recommends denial of concurrent ;
Zone Change No . 84-10 with the following finsxings :
1 . The proposed R3 and MI-,a zoning it not consistent With the
recomnended retention of the General Commercial designation
in (and Use Element Amendment No. 84-2 ,
2 . Pezonin9 s;,the site to accommodate mini -warehouses and
apartments would be incompatible with surrounding land uses .
ANALYSIS:
Ttse applicant, Lindborg-Dahl-Hoelschrir/Guggenheim, has requested a
redesignation of approximately 10 .4 acres of land from , !O)R5 (Qualified
Office Professional ) to R3 (Medium Density Residential ) and MI-A
(Restricted Manufacturing ) to accommodate a proposed mixed development
of apartments and mini-warehouses . The applicant has 'indicated that
there is a three year surplus of vacant office space in the City and
that they have tried unsuccessfully since 1980 to market an office
development on the site. The Planning Commission, at its October 16 ,
1964 meeting , concurred with the applicant ' s contention that an oFt'ice
dessIgnation on the site is unmarketable . They also agreed that office
development on this site would reduce the demand for off tce develop' meat
along Beach. Boulevard and in the Downtown area where the City is
actively promoting such development. For these reasons the F.lanning
Commission is recommending approval of the applicant' s request.The area proposed for medium high, density apartments would be, located
on , the east 7.1 acres of the site and would be abutted, by exia Ling
commercial developments on the east (across Magnolia S`treet . .i.n Fountain `
Valley) . and south , the San Diego Freeway on the north, and the proposed'
mini-wa-rehouses on the west. Traffic generated by these adjacent `usoss
sus well as the 'accens problems caused by ,the site' s close , proximity to
(I304d) --2- RCA
the freeway would significantly impact the proposed residential
development with noise and other environmental impacts . To help
mitigate such impacts would require extensive buffering and noise
attenuation measures . However , it is staff' s view that the site would
not provide a suitable living environment nor be a desirable location
for residential development even with the employment of these measures .
The mini-warehouse development is intended to be located on the west
3 .3 acres of the site . The purpose behind the proposed mini-warehouse
development and M1-A zonir.,, is to provide a buffer between the proposed
medium high density apartments and the existing low density single
family neighborhood to the went. However, the proposed' warehouses and
M1-A Zoning constitutes an industrial use, and it would be spot
planning and zoning to place such a use in an area, surrounded by
residential uses . Warehouses should most appropriately be restricted
to identified industrial areas in the Ci *y, i .e . , the Central
Industrial Corridor and the northwest Industrial Parks adjacent to the
McDonnell--Douglas complex . Given the character of the surrounding land
uses , the existing R5 zoning designation would be the most appropriate
use of the site .
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS s
The environmental impacts of Zone Change No. 54-10 aro addressed in
Environmental Impact Report No . 64-3 which also covers Land ::,ie Element
Amendment No. 84-2 . The City Council must approve EIR No . R4--3 before
approving this zone change.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
zt: the City Council approves the applicant' s request for Area 3 . 2 of
Land Use Element Amendment No . 84-2l the Council may adopt Zonri Change
No. E34-10 with a "o" on the zoning. Staff would recommend that the
conditions be divided between the two proposed zoning designations as
follows :
Conditions on "0" M1-A:
1 . Any future development will be subject to approval of a
Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission .
2 . At the time of development the project shall be required to
cover the flood control channel between V11agnalia Street and
Warner Aver.ues .
3 . The proposed project shall be designerl and l ayed out to be
compatible «itb the adjacent single family residential tract �I
to the west.
i
4 . The project stall addreva the closure of Conner Drive to the
satisfaction of the City' s Fire Department.
5 . Vie aria zoned Hl--A aball be limited to mini--storage uses ,
(1304d) . ,.3 RCA
Conditions on "0" R3 :
1 . Any future development will be subject to approval of a
Conditional User Permit by the Planning Comminsion .
2 . At the time of development the project shall be required to
cover the flood control chatine 1 between Magnolia Street and
Warner Avenues .
3 . The proposed project shall be designed and layed out to be
compatible with the adjacent single family residential tract
to the west .
4 . The project entrance oif Magnolia Street shall be dcsioned to �
City standards and compatible rii. th the adjacent commercial
center to the south .
ATTACHME?1'I S
1 . Staff Report dated October 16, 1984
2 . Ordinance
OWP :HS : ajh
j
j
i
(1304d)
4- RCA 11-5-84
i
• z.=..ter.._ _ -
Rf of , �1 t Rt 'I at ` PI o
RI RI YI t
C4 F �
R1 ' Rf f RI ��• i
al
Rl
C 4 Al
i
1 {.?. 4►� Sri ate a, Re
1
t i C4 w.•, N. �; R� 1a/ RI '.�rw; =' Aloil .� t
A t A� - ��+ ! R 4 ( -` J
611
P"M)RI
Cat I �i L �L.�` w, Re - lot .► aI W
Its
Al 1
1
ZcS+-10
tY14[t��Giph EIACN
HUNTWGTON BEACH PLANNING DIYISION
-77
huntington beach developrrfen' services department
REPORT!ffAFf
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Development Services
DATE: Cc tober 16, 1984
SUBJECT: ZC-14E CHANGE NO. 04-10
(IN CONJUNCTION WITH LUE 84--2, Area 3 . 2 )
APPLICANT: Lindborg--Dahl DATE ACCEY-TED:
Hoelscher/Guggenheim July 11 , 1984
17220 Newhope St. 0226
FL,untain Valley , CA 92708
REQUEST: To rezone approximately MANDATORY PROCESSING GATE:
7 . 11 acres of property Not Applicable
from (Q) R5 (Qualified
Office Professional ) to R3
(Medtum liigh Density
Residential ) , and 3 . 29
acres of property frotr. %Q) I
R5 (Cualified Office
Professional ) to MI -A
(Restricted Manufacturing )
LOCATION: Subject property is located ZONE:
west of Magnolia Street and Q R5 (Office
approximately 450 feet Professional )
nor ! h of Warner Avennue .
ACREAGE: 10 .4 GENEk-kL PLAN:
General Commercial
EXISTING USEt
Agr c�tur 1 Greenhouses
1 .0 SUGGFSTED ACTION:
r,
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission dent Zone Change : NO .,
84--10.
2 .0 GENERAL 1 N FGRi►1ATI ON t tt�
'1
Initiated by laindbor Dahl-Hoelscher Guggenheims, Zone, Change No .
84-10 i a a reques t to rezone the property `coca ted west of Magnolia
Street and approximatelA '450 feat north of garner Avenue. fr•ow (C) R5
C7. .��
• P�. ttl�
(Qualified Office Professional ) to R3 (Medium f:igh r.4ensi ty
Residential ) and M1-A (Restricted Manufacturing ) ., This zone change
is being considered concurrently witls Land Use Llement Amendment kilo .
84 -2 , Area 3 . 2 .
3 .0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS ;
The subject property is addressed in draft EnviAronsn,ental Impact:
Report No. 84-3 for LUE 84-2 which is being processed concurrently
with this zone- change . Pursuant to Vie environmental regulations in
effect at this:; time, the Department of Development Services posted
draft Environmental Impact Report No. 04-3 for a 45-day co-nment and
review period which ended October 12, 1,964 .
4 .0 SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZO.`.'ING, AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS :
Subject Property•
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commerclal
ZONE: (Q) R5 (Qualified Gf f tce Professional )
LAND USE: Agricultural Greenhouses
North of Subject Property:
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: tow Uensity Residential
ZONE. Cc-E Communi t Eaci I i t Educatton,z l
( )
I
}
LAND USE: Elementary School/ rreewa}
East of Subject Property (Lit), of Fountain Valle}) :
GENrPAL PLhN DESIGNATION: Commercial Recreation
ZONE: Commercial Recreation
LAND 'USE: Amusement Park/Mote).
South of Subject Proper tl:
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial
ZONE: C2 (Community Business Cisstrtct )
LAND USE: Shopping Center
West of Subject Prof.erty:
GENERAL PLAN DESIGN.,xIQN: Low Density Residential
Z012E: R1 (Low Density Residential )
LAN) USE: Single-family homes;
5 . 0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS :
The applicant , tindborg-Dahl-tiorlscher/Gug'genheim,. has roqueateo a
tedesignation of approximately 10 .4 acres of land 'fto-r (o)RS ` (Qualiftr
office Professional ) to R3 (Medium b�ensify, Residcltsr.l.alj and f�l -A
(RestrricteR Manufacturiaig) to accommodate a pzopoacd nixed, develonsgnt
of apartments and mini-werohounes . The area propv,'ied for me.-Stun, high
density apartments would be located on 'the east 7 1' . acres of the site
r.
•
and would be abutted by existing commercial developments on the east
(across Magnolia Street in Fountain Valley) and south, the San Diego
freeway on the north , and the proposed mini.-warehouses on the west.
Traffic generated by these adjacent uses as well as the access problems
• caused bl, the site ' s close proximity to the freeway would significantly
impact the proposed residential development with voiae and rather
eanvixonzental impacts. To be) p mitigate such impacts would require
extensive buffering and noise attenuation measures . However , it is
stafila view L•hat the site would not provide a suitable living
environment nor be 3 desirable location for residential development
even with the employment of these me:-tsures .
The mini--warehouse development is intended to be located an the west
3 . 3 acres of the site . :'tie purpose behind the proposed mini. -wnrehCJur✓e
develo :.lent and M1-A zoning is to provide a buffer between the proposed
P 9 1 p !�
medium high density apartments and the existing low density
single-family neighborhood to the west . However, the proposed
warehouses and Ml-A zoning constitutes an industrial use, and it would
be spot planning rand zoning to place such a use in an area surrounded
by residential uses . Warehouses should mast appropriately be
restricted to identified industrial areas in the City, i . e . , the
Central Industrial Corridor and the northwest Industrial Parka adjacent
to the McDonnell--Douglas complex . Given the character of the
surrounding land uses , the existing F5 zoning designation would be the
most appropriate use of the site .
6 .0 RECOMMENDATION :
Staff recommends that the Manning Commission deny Lone C;iar:ge No .
84-10 with the following findings after action has teen taken on Land
Use Element Amendment No . 64-2.
FINDINGS:
1 . The R3 and MI-A zoning would be inconsistent with the
recommended retention of the commercial designation in Land Use
Element Amendment No. 84-2 .
2 . Rezoning the site to accommodate apartments and mini -warehouses
would be incompatible with surrounding land uses .
ATTACHMENTS :
1 . Area Map
2 . ordinance
JwpeC ra31r
( 1266d) -3- Staff i.vpart 10-16-64
AQvertaarne�isqo )ail almas including DUDI,C '
' :ha supet,cr court Of 014nya Ctunty �fl' lit; rti3iit
1?t; dated 29 5eptember 1961 snc LAX0 U"..ELMOq,.
15163
%%lr Wl.T Ey Ing City Grx-r;
cM of Q%Oir C I H r►i 1Ratan
J�+ r.o-. .;,<. •c.r+r� co•r.e �f 13oxty.'',IA. l!►4"CoJACII
I ;, •w.� .,..�•.., , .., �,,, � T, tC��nirr�or er• t!►i_ CtrlC
..,w ,0.11.GaV^� wales � ;C!'�tef. N•�l'r+^tpn t3fsAG.9
a.rt., ci
Mani.1py�ua 6'W
.t a Citizen o+ the United States ano a resident of � �� 1 � WvAt'°t.`j�R'� �'l
`R+rr�ae of y tatar.�rnp, s
the Count aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen p'� w°K`Qvr' �1DV'e
y g g '� f.rn+t�tL1y.:dL'urrett;'W•��
Guts.,,,trarrylWr_114.4 En.
years, and not a party to or interested in the below G ►tTWtit'r-A1 erect Rein
"!% ZV*%Ca>t.+'tl"4r4
entitled matter. I am a principal clerk at Ine Orange Y� U-4 dace 04.10'trt't'Cdt W,
(/ 41w a fys 1 =Mit s.
Coast t7AiLY PILOT. wtfr ►nt x
which is combined the (12
a "As 'arwcri 8" �
iy4 tr fog ry cR#t O►t+N�
NEWS-PRESS, a newspaper of general circulation. .� �*.,.
Aria 1j.•rAda aW�cY
printed and aubhshet7 in the Clty of Costa Mesa. II&NIUav`v to t"fl Laid Us*
\ z3as'+1't rk�►'r kV"q
t'fA-
County of Orange. State ct California, and that a %`1 aty •,,,
Land `Jae -I e n e n t C.ox ti A mom£srrrnrr.►n•
Noti:e of Ans -At, 'pmftit;hs!s`
4.65 94'211 glad 1MKt rI
t'*k'i'f'.1.LOd,ib�t1 �J'.lt'Ot
.•, __._�...____.. .�........._...._.__ . - ---- � � Y�Ar•.;tt k1P►rs�s tnOr'1 GOr�-
of which copy attacnea nerela is a true and complete c �rr,,er la"srawsria�tuftwwi
n� � tt�lF �t�:'T.7:'• j�asa��ta4::
copy. was printed and published in the Costa Mesa, q
V �1 i104 W0016wed riot of
Newport Beach. Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, V9b �1ttlrt :rt9Jlr.a.^�a-
y 'rtt,tht�;Ld Irst'j+ut.�'•of
!,,vine, the Soutn Coast communities and Laguna r,cr�r WA"^r o1.10
t,tUos
.� .or �xa,c�r,�►,�a
Beach issues of said nUispapa..r for 1 tine �0:4 �r,t0..drot:;�.t••j
Ott d!'+P rt��smtatr2�
wit the issue(s) of ca,rls(PL-W od0ftA.
i
ak-asionat Dcvf-.tt to R7
/t,:, 1 ►!`,fi•M:�It Dtr�ty fbt•►
'q allrl►-jo3-,v�tty'SJ�'tut!ln.4
O c t o b e r 2 b 4to
._.. 198...—_ �9s.s;txt�e:.'tge,►�q�"ram
14 ft A4t-
156 it
At" ",tcc'910 VA" 4^4
h►4'at'tAQ'if. kt�
d t}R`:oc�Q•ti L'f�fo:
NNI �'saCifkaStttD�Y�
i 9t3 ��t �yq
P¢�, t>rls�stza.'�Itpt��:i
MI"im's i1w fr„itt+id,
I declarer under penalty of perjury, that the 14KOwn�y1�
itG'tr+atal;^G�.,ltrt; ood at
foregoing is true and Correct. , r-wa,os+d'>�a:+t� ,a
ev*00" +►t U�'U'A'iM�U'14
f6WA,'r acllps;ttf,�F���turt
October 26 �+ Vol 4-rafte4ta"O.►^ >�;
Executed on . 198 .._._ .rnK.e�s� .wa
�� ti+vhtlr!!o ttr Md�•1r�.tar•
at Costa Mel, California. • ,!+offs*+`,,A�+prirxat att.r�
` to trot 1 a�7
Signature �� R-662
..{;,, ."
}C�11►d�it��rir CA"t�tOtrr''�IAA�,
AV f Aic tc t ►sit
cAua+r.+e
�>tUlEt�'�•��'�� '014)
f'.ttr C
19
��� �• iL�stCItW:.aarve'cuVt
PROOF OF PUBLICATION POO> dot
ti . The pro `ect entrance off. i:agnolia Street shall be designed to
City standards and compatible with the adjacent cormerci a 1
canter to tlge south .
5 . The pro ject shall address the closuze of Conner Drive to the
satisfaction of the City' s Fire Department.
6 . The area zoned Yll -A shall be limited to Orsini.-storage u6cs .
FINDINGS
1 . The R3 and Ml-A zoning would be misi,tent with the Mixed Use
designation in Lana Use Element Amendment No. 84-2 .
2 . Rezoning the site to accommodate apartnents and
mini-warehouse, would be compatible with surrounding land
uses .
STAFF RECOMMENDATION :
staff is recommending denial of Area 3 . 2 of Land Use Elenent
Amendment No. 83--2 .. As such , staff recomitendr• d,,:nial of concurrent
Zone Change No . 84-10 with the following filncings :
1 . The proposed R3 and LVI1-A zoning is not consistent with. the
recommended retention of. the General Commercial designation �
` in (and Use Element Arendment No . 84-2 .
2 . Rezoning the site to accomwodato mini -warehousea and
apartments would be inconpat ule with surrounding lard rises .
4
MALYS I S:
The i-q-3plicant. Findburg-Dahl-lioelscher/GuQgenheim, has requested a
redes:ignation of approxinate'ly 10 .4 acres of land trg�r. (Q)R5 (Gualif,ied
office Professional ) to R3 (NIedi am %ensity Residential ) and MI -A
(Restricted Manufacturing ) to .accorimodate a proposed mixed development
of apartments and mini --warehouses . The applicant �:as indicated that
there is a three year surplus of vacant office space in the City and
that they have tried uasucce6a:iilly since : 960 to -market an office
development on the site . Th&2 Planning Commission, at Ics• october :.6 ,
.10.84 meeting , concurred with the applicant ' s contention %,hat an otficp
designation on the site is unmarketable , 'Whey also agreed that r officr±
6evelopment, on this site would ra-iuce the taezand fol office development
along Beach Boulevard and in the Gowntvw_% .tea whe:.is thy: City is
actively ,promoting such development. ;br these reasons the Placinena
Commission is recommending approval of the applicant ' s request,
The area' proposed for zedium high d4risi ty apartments would be loc&te-d
oc�e;e�rcial cast
ce� elucme& �s�ar the
t.�ette nastand
would be •aUt�ttec� Dy cixi�t:ng `}� .
(across t,ar.%ol .A Strant ; n �1ttC1 . �
valley) and south, ;, ha Sari -'Diego , Yrecwa-1 on. the'.iiorth, and -the prop see a
ralniwwarebouses, en the west.. -Traf-.ic...:yenet'a�ed ".by thesR atf-lacent us=►a
as--.well as the accelas problems 'caused by the si te' a close proximi t'y, fti
KA
1304 a) -z-.
REQUEST FOR G14fY COUNCIL ACTION
Date Cct.oicr 20, 19,fA
Suhrrittaito: Honorable Mayor and City Coun-i.l
Submittodby: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrate
4J,
0
��.
Pra arodb Janes W. i'a1 in , Girectc,.c , Development Services '
SubjW: ZONL CEANGE tiG. 64-10 ( IN CONJUNCTION WI T ti LAND US
'LEMENT AMENDMI.NT INO, 84-20 AREA 3 . 2 '
Sta►ement of Issut, Rmo:nmendtltion, Analysis, Fundiity Source, Alternativa Actions, Attach rwnts: '_� '.
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
TranF.,ritted for ;our consideration is Zone Char.ge No. 84--10, a
request by Li:ia'borg-Dahl-lioelsc:ner/:uggenheir.. to re ine
approxim rely 7 .11 acres of property from (0) RS (01;al i fied Office
Profesnional ) to R3 (N.edium Hirh Density Resident: i" . ) and 3. 29 acres
of prcpert.y frc m (C.) RS to MI --A ( Hest.r acted Manufacturing ) . The
subject property is located on the west side of Magnolia Street
approxi r-a tely 450 feet north of Warner Avenue .
i"-,: 'PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION AND RECONA-MENDATICN:
The Planning Coa•mi su icn held a public bearing on the zone change
request on October 16 , 1964 .
On wt::on by Liveng000 and second by Higgins Zone Change No . 84-10
was approved to (u ) R3 and (0 ) MI-•A with the following conditions on
the "W' , and recomiiended to the City Council for adoption by the
following vote :
AYES : Higgins , winchell, Livengood, Po: ter , Erskine ,
Schumacher , Mirjahangir
NOES : hone
ASS ENT: None
ABSTAIN: None �
I
i
Conditions on "Q" :
1 . Any future deve to—ment w i}. 1 be subject to approval oz a
Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission.
2 . At the time of development the project shall be required to
cover the flood control channel between Magnolia S treat and
Warner Avenues .
The proposed pro;;ect shall be desig;ead and layed out to be
compatible with the -tdjacent single family rezidew ial tract
to the west .
Co.#
Conditions on n4„ Ira
1 . AnY future development will be subject to approval of a
Conditional User Permit by the Planning Commission .
f 2 . At the time of development ;'I- ^ protect shall be required to
i cover the flood control channel between Magnolia Street. and
Warner Avenues .
` 3 . The proposed project shall be designed and layed out to be
compatible with the adjacent single family residential tract
to the west.
4 . The pro;;ect entrance off Magnolia Street shall be designed to
"i ty stands:ds and compatible with the adjacent commercial
center to the south .
I
ATTACHMENTS :
1 . S to f f Report dated October ' 6, 1984
2 . ordinance
J Wr : s : a jh
�.r
1� the freeway would significantly impact the proposed rouicen:ial
:�. .,:•f development with noise and other ervironrental impacts . To help
mitigate such impacts would require extensive buffering and noise
attenuation measures . However , it is staf:' s view that the si.t:c would
not provide a suitable living environment nor be a desirable location
for residential development even with the employrent of these measures .
The mini-warehouse development is intended to be located on the West
3 . 3 acres of the r1te . The purpose behind the proposed mini-warehouse
develops:-ient and ZMI-A zoning is to provider a buffer between the proposed
wedium high density apartments and the existing low 6ensity lint le
f:,mily neighborhood to the west . However , the proposes warehouses and
M. -A zoning consti tut a an industrial use , and it would be slut
planning and zoning to place suer, a use in ar, area surrounded by
residential uses . 'Aarehouses should most appropriately be restricted
to identified indust-• ial areas in the City, i .e . , the Central
Industrial Corridor and the northwest Industrial Parks ad�aeent to the
McDonnell-Douglas complex . Given the character of the surrounding land, '
uses, the existing R5 zoning designation, would be the most appropriate
use of the site .
ENVI ROhME`.'TAL STATUS :
The environmental impacts of -.one Change No . 64 -10 are aco.essed in
Environr,eratal impact Report No . 64-3 w►, tc.-h a?.so covers Land Use Element
l:mendr,et�t No . 84-2 . The Ci t} Council rust approve Elk No . 84-3 befor-e
;eapproving this zone change .
ALTERNATIVE ACT1ON:
If the City Council_ approves the applicant ' s request for Area 3 . 2 of
Land Use Element Amendment No . 64 -2 , the Council may adopt tore Change
No . 84-10 with a "0" on the eon i nq . S t :,f f would rr cownen d that the
conditions be divided between the two proposed zoning designations as
follows :
Conditions on "0" XI-A:
1 . Any future development will be subDect to approval of a
Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission . I
2 . At the t. me: of developne:it tl;e project shall be required to
covet the flood control channel between X.agrol is S truc t and
Warner Avenues .
3 . The proposed pro ec t shall be designed and la,,%!a out to be
compatible with the adDacent si.gle family residential tract
to the west . j
4 . il.e pro )ect shell address Oic closure of Conner Drive to the
satisfaction of the City' s Fire Cepartment.
5 . The area zoned MI-A shall be limited to mini--storage uses.
Y
(1304d) -3- ),CA
•
huntington beach development services department
STA� r
..REPOR"E -
TO : Planning Commission
FROM: DaveIopment Services
DATE: October 16 , 1984
SUBJECT: 'LONE.: CBANGE NO. 84 -10
( 114 CONJ UI�CT ION WITH LUti 64 -2 , Area 3 . 2 )
AP_ LICANT s Linoborg-.Dahl DATE E ACC E'P , ED:
l?oe i Scher/Guggenhe i :1, jul y 11 , 1984
17220 Newhope St . :226
Fountain Val let. , CA 92706
REQUEST : To rezones approxinately N,:,NDATORY PI;CCESSINC, rATL:
7 . 11 acres of property Not Appiicable y
from (U ) RS (Qualified
Of £ice Professional ) to R3
(Medium High Density
Residential ) , and 3 . 21D
acres of p F ro ,erty from (0 ) (�J
KS (Cui, lified Office
Pro f-:ss ian,-a 1 ) to MI -A
(Restr ictea manufacturing )
w
LOCATION: StibJect propert }, ic; located ZONE :
west of Magnolia Strt?e t and (Op R5 (Of f ire
approximately 450 feet Professional )
north of harmer Avennue .
ACREAGE: 10 .4 GENEML PLAN :
General Cosy."nereial
EXISTING USE:
Ayr icul turn 1 Greenhouses
1 .0 SUGGE,STEU ACT-ION :
Staff recomr.ends tha t the Planning Comsr,i ss ion ur_nl Zone Chance ".0 .
84-10. -
2 .0 GLNERAL INEGRMATIOti: �
Initiated by Lindl>org-Dahl - iloelacher/Guggenbei.r-, Zone Chance No . T � '
S4-10 is a regUeut to rezone the property located Went of Magnol ►A
S tcee t and appxox i m-I to l y 450 fee c north of Warner Avenue from (L ) t.`,
t3
i i : . . \
t
7 � f
j IJ
{�ins or c1,j wr ( a: t a ;- w` �).. a. {�•. is .. n{ A{ �� a s� �`1 J
qI
1 aid �� r �.^• i �— j f1, ��-... 1 L,.. i .�'�•• i
i -- - �✓- B 1 a r
r _
cj at q{ ! - ram._ J ; �• `:(
- - _ _ k-L-
CF C 1
. - - r�' '•� � i ram..,_. : � �
•} � 1i N 1 • t 7
bF,
• •; t, t >� -__ _ ' :1 J33 y of
.ifs.
Y
ZC84-40
VOL :r.f1�lN
HUNTiN-10TON bjACN PLANNINGS VIY!SIOPJ
t and wouiu be'' abutted by existing commercial developrents on the east
04
(across Magnolia Street in Fountain Valley) and south , .ne San Gie(jc
Freeway on the north, and the proposed roini -warehvuse:•s on the West .
Traffic generated by these ad3acent uses as well as the access probicyr..s
caused Ziy the site' s close proximity to the freeway woul.ri siyni f icant : }
iz.pact the proposed resid(�ntii, l development with noise •::nd oche:
environn. enta; impacts . To help mitigate such i -mpacts would require
extensive bufferiny and noise attenuation reasuves . however , it is
staff ' s view that: the site would not provide a suitable living
environment- nor be a desirable: location for residential development
even with the employment of these mei.sures .
The mini -warehouse development is intended to be located on the west
3 . 3 acres of the site . i?he purpose behind the proposed miini -warehoi:ae
development and MI-A zoning is to provide a buffer between the proposed
medium high density apartments and the existing lov% density
single-family neighborhood to the west . however , the proposed
warehouves and MI -A zonina constitutes an industrial use , and it would
be spot planning and zoning to place such a use in an area surrounded
by residential uses . Warehouses should ;,,ost appropriately be
restricted to identified industrial areas in the City, i .e . , the
Central Industrial Corridor and hin. nortliwe st, Industrial Parks adjacent :
to the McDonnEll-Douglas complex . Given the character of the
i surrounding land users , the existing A5 zoning aesignation ►•oulo he thc�
most appropriate use of the site .
6 .0 kLCO.MMENDATI ON :
Staff recommends that. the Planning Commission deny Zone Chancy_
84 -10 with the followinr_, i incline;s of ter action has been Lakciti on l..ir;r,
Use Element Amendment No . 64-2 .
FINDINGS :
l . They h3 and M:-A zoning wou ' a be neon: i s tent with the
recommended retention of the commercial designation in Land Use
F.leiment Amendment No. 64-2 .
2 . Rezoning the site to accommodate apartments and mini-warehouses
would be iticor,.patible with surrounding land uses .
AT T ACHMENTS :
i
1 . Area `-tar �
2 . Urdi+ianc:e
JWP: CC:a jh
GQ • yt
(Qualified Office Professional ) to fi3 (Med► um Nigh Density
Residential ) and MI-A ( Restricted Manufacturing ) . This zone change
is being considered co•icurrently with Land Use Lle..ent Arendment No .
84 --2 , Area 3 . 2 .
3 .0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS :
The subject property is undressed in oraf t Environr,:ental Impact
Report No . 64-3 for L L 84--2 which is being prccessed concurrently
with this zone change . Pursuant to the envy ron.ren to l regulations in
effect at this time , the Department of re_velopa-M-nt Serviceys poste(:
draft Environmental Impact Report No . 84 -3 for a 45-day comment ana
i
review period which ended October 12 , 1984 .
4 .0 SUhROUNDING LAND USE:, ZONING, AIND GENERAL PLAN LESIGNATIONS :
Subject Pro,2erty%
GENERAL PLAN DES IGN'ATI C'y: Gene:a 1 Cori-erc i a 1
ZONE: (Q) R5 (Qualified Lice Professional )
j LAND USE: Agricultural Greenhouses
,. North of Subject Property:
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION : Low Ccnsity residential
ZON:.: CI•- I. Wo:a -un i t y racI I i t y-Lduca t iona l )
LAND USE: E► pmentar }• School/ Fre(►way
Last of Sub
�ect PrDjerty (Ci t � of Fountain
Gi:'N'PRAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Copmercial Recreation
ZONE: Ccr;mearcial recreation
LAND USE: Azusecent Park/Motel
South of Subject ProC.eyrty :
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial �
ZONE: c.2 (community lousiness Cistrict )
LAND USE: Shopping Center
West, of Sub jest Prol.ert�
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential
20NE: R1 ( Low Density Residential )
LAND US : Single-family homes
5 .0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
T1%c applicant , Girdborg-L.alil -Itoe l schet-/Guggen}:e i n;, has requested a
edesicnat r�inn of a raxi.;nrsteyl } 1e7 . 4 acres of landlandfree (0) R5 I.Vor
Otf�cc Professional ) to R3 (Mc6ium Lens i ty Hesiaential f anti ?•tl.-A
(Restricted Manufactur'i,::3 ) t(.) acconnodate a prdposeti mixed devolorrent
of apartments and mini -warehouses . The area propoaed for zi-�diuc, high
pa would be located on tee. eat:t 7 . l acres of` the r.i ie
density a rtbents w .'� .
An
�.M
Attik
Street , a iistance o,. 516 . 50 feet to the nor-
therly lire of the Orange County Flood Control
District Channel , as recorded in Book 6409 , page
684 of official records of Laid county ; thence
north 89032 ' 38" went along the northerly line
of said channel a distance of 61 . 40 feet to a
point on the westerly line of a deed to the State
of California as recorded in Book 6375 , page 602
of official records of said county, said point
being the true point of beginning; thence north
89032138 " west along the northerly line of said
channel a distance of 420. 77 to the beginning of
a curve concave southerly having a : er ius of
227 . G0 feet; thence westerly along „yid northerly
i line 27 . 73 feet along said carve through a cen-
tral angle of 6059 ' 56" to Point A; thence north
00010137" east leaving said northerly line a
distance of 610 . 52 feet ; thence south 89031153"
east a distance of 1.19 . 33 feet; thence north
00028107" east a distance of 40, 00 feet to a
point on the southwesterly lire of said deed to
the State of California , said point being also on
a curve concave northeasterly having a radius of
400. 00 feet a radial line though said poii,t
! + bears north 54035156 " east; thence south- i
' easterly along said southwesterly line 81 . 95 feet
IA4A along said curve through a central angle of.
11044119" ; thence south 47008123" east along
said southwesterly lA.ne a distance of 265.96 feet
to the- beginning o: a curve concave southwesterly
having a radius o ; 200 . 00 feet; thence south-
easterly along said southwesterly line 155. 12
feet along said curve through a central angle of
44026124 " ; thence south 02041159" east along
said southwesterly iA'.ne a distance of 3371 , 23 feet
to the true point of beginning.
subject to the following conditions :
1 . Any future develop;a+>rit will be subject to approval by the
Planning Commission of a conditional use permit.
2. At the time Qf develop.,�ent the project shall include , sub-
ject to approval by Orange Ccuntf , covering the flood control
channel between Magnolia Street and Warne: avenue .
3 . The proposed design and layout of the project shall be
compatible with the adjacent single-family residential tract to
2 .
>r
i
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE Or THE CITY 011 HUP:T7NGTON E ACfi
AY.ENDTNG THE iiUNTI NG T ON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE
BY AMENDING SECTIO` 9061 TO PROVIDE. FOR CHANGE
OF 'LOVING FROM QUALIFIED O"rFICE PROFESSIONAL
DISTRICT TO OUALIFIED MEDIUM HIGH DEt:SITY RESb-
DENTTAL DISTRICT AND TO QUhLI�'I'r:p RES'"itICA
MANUFACTURIi:G DISTRICT ON REAL PROPERTY GENER-
ALLY LOCATED WEST OF MAGNOLIA STREET AND NORTH
OF WARNER AVENUE (ZONE CASE NO. 84-10)
WHEREAS , pursuant to the state Planning and Zoning Law, the
Huntington Beach Planning Commission and Huntington Beach City
Council have had separate public hearings relative to Zone Case
No. 84-10 wherein both bodies have carefully considered all in-
formation presented at said Kea. ings , and after due consideration
of the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission and
I all evidence presented to said City Council. the City Council
finds that such zone change is proper , and consistent with the
general plan ,
NO148 THE-SIEFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington
Beach does ordain as follows :
SECTION 1 . The following described real property, generally
located west of Magnolia Street and 450 feet north of Warner
Avenue , is hereby changed from (Q) R5 , "Qualified Office
Professional. District" to MR3 , Qualified Medium high-density
Residential D iatr ict: "
PARCEL 1 , (Q) R3 : Commencing at the centerline
intersection of ;darner Avenue with Magnolia
Street, said centerline intersection being also
the southeast corner of Section 24 , Township 5
South, Range 11 West ; thence north 001018 ' 50"
east along the east ling: of said section , said
east line being ulso the centerline of Magnolia
RCS : ahia
1DJ29/84 ,.
1193d Ray.
1 .
compatible with the adjacent single-fanily residential tract to
�s the west .
4 . The Fire Department shall specify the means by which Coln-
pl.ete or partial closure of Conner Drive shall be accomplished.
5 . The area zoned MI.-A shall be limited to mini-storage uses .
SECTION 3 . Section 9061 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance
i
Code , District Map 27 (Sectional District viap 24- 5--11) o is hereby
amended to reflect the change contained in this ordinance and or,
the map attached hereto . The Director of Development Services in
hereby directed to prepare and file an amended map. A copy of
said district mape as amended hereby , is available for inspection
in the off ices of the City Clerk .
SECTION 4 . This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after
its passage .
i
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the
day of . 1984 .
1 �
- mayor
ATTEST : APPROVED AS '1*O FORM:
City Clerk City Attorney
REVIEWEED AND APPROVED; 1141TIATED AND APPROVED:
City Administrat'r erector of Development
Services
A
4 ,
i the west .
4 . Access to the project shall he off Magnolia Street , shall
meet city standards and specifications , and shall be compatible
with the adjacent commercial center to the south .
SECTION 2 . The following described real property, generally
located west of ,Magnolia Street and 450 feet north of Warner
Avenue , is hereby changed from (Q) R5 , "Quilified Office
Professional District" to (Q) K--A, "Qualified Restricted
Manufacturing District : "
PARCEL 2 , (Q) `!1 -A : Eeiiinning at Point A, de-
scribed in Parcel 1 , said point being on the nor-
therly line of said channel , said point being
also on a curve concave southeasterly having a
radius of 227. 00 feet; thence southwesterly along
said northerly line 175 . 95 feet along said curve
through a central angle of 440025106" ; thence
north 00018138 " east leaving said northerly
�
II line a distance of 889 . 30 .r ..et to a point on the
north line of the South half of the southeast
quarter of said section ; thence. south 89031 ' 53"
east along said north line a distance of 201 .96
feet to a point on the westerly line of said deed
i to the state. of California , said point being also
on a curve concave northeasterly having a radius
of 40Q . OG feet: , a r4dial line through said point
bears north 79001 ' 23" east; thence south-
easterly along said westerly line 170 . 51 feet
along said curve through a central angle of
24025127" ; thence south 00028107" west
leaving said westerly line a distance of 40. 00 �
feet; thence north 69031 ' S3" west a distance of �
1.1.9 . 33 feet ; thence south 00018137" west a
distance of 610 . 52 feet to the point of beginning .
subject to the following cd:. itions :
1 . Any future development shall be subject to approval by the
Planning Commission; of a conditional use permit.
2. At the time of development , the project shall includes ,
subject to approval by Grange County , covering the flood cortroi
channel between Magnolia Street and Warner Avenue.
3 . The proposed desi,n and layout of the project shall be
3 .
PLANNING ZONING CAM 2
S E C i I 0 N A t DISTRICT ,tip A P 24- 5- 11
e,a•rfel rt�..a+. I+ •l• w...... ... ...r
LM.Lt i �
1 .,ir'v •C •►
CITY
OF .■_,y•• 1►//a■M•.'1 •.•.•
j N►V+A, M w•
��Ir'(IIS�('Cjvi +�+t••;'�i■�_1i�I�J. ll.'.1►�`
•* r'\ p !•1+ Jrl ■Ip ! i Hfa �•. ► � •w.at •+e.• r�av,
T I1,ryi{g {�\j p`/�+1/ ' •' ! /JA�y �HAIL"
�! .•1. ie !J.. I 1 �•.'T\.J .� 1.3.1.I• [ \�� • /•U 10 IV I •..\}� •r1 1 1w✓. r.NN •+•r"
1011
♦ -■ a 1 ♦ • • • •:1 fa W 1;/• •s+1 ....ra_. /a rr/a,b ►+'■►1
n !� 11 ,1 t. 1: Cat) (� ,1 '� 1 , t, �t I. ! it c) Ii ,ti i �I .,., �.1- 1_.../.........'...,. .
�l \ a/M•ndrl
_ •gar• l�
y��• it 1 � Z AA �.w►Y...r.a rl.•
�f1�/.� �1 ( L....� �..��^.._-..w.-�.�.�..�a-.sue..•-•• •- .�..._..w..........� .__._..._.-.».._ .. � ....._...,.i t„
Cz
/ I�....�`fir �._... �•1_. -..--.,.._r � •.-�^ j r
C 2 `` " . `� R 3 _ -�-
1 N.
Ail
R3 r
•f.•. ..c .i. -
lu
1 Y
• w :
�, 1'•I t�.l AI �,��'►. ''1 MI �•; p � 1 .. ,7 � .c q. _� � • L.i^�-'-'� ; .!l\ �...__ „_ ' i•
y1 R ,J RI j M I k1 !Il N1 fa R t p I.I 14
no at
II
*I "\.�j 1.....„ j
1 1 v�.fir. 1 q 1 t.. . 1. N I N 7 O•�
i
-, ---�--- 1 ;f 1 k' ( N 1 I ,
Ilk—��� —
oil
�� .•. ,. -'�1 1_•- j
I I j 1�1 11r l� ��� 14 1ir��i� (�µ. .� � 1 r •�v` A
f C4 IMt ( �1 +�� qi �S� 'af \��qi j• Ni �;.., : t•7 ;i; �+ Ilty
r 1' f { * r t I
jl•'1'.•.�`�.1.:_'J ��+ la ^+ � �'.�� � � � •i
..-ql
Lei
A"i•
! :r4� •) �; CC spa • C j\„�lr •; 1 �� i }� �:1,�`,.,t._.. E
z; it, t(+'(CI; NI '.`jl 111 f r►�
V '1 1 � a•5•/tea.a��•.•1 is 1 i� " ��� � • S 1 f) � ,/�-''•�\J
p � N7 i f � "a .. 1 t, fe � al S.� l ■Ii:fM,t.: �� C ,t a
•� r'� fH�i�At A 1 r►�
ZONE CHANGE N . 6 4-•1 A �*