HomeMy WebLinkAboutZone Case 84-10 - Lindborg-Dahl-Hoelscher-Guggenheim - W sid h.thoriiea 10 publish AdvarUsemer.ts JR-unds inCludinq oubliC puf l iC f101ic-,
nOlrce$ by 06cre9 0l trio superict Court 01 Ofjnge Courtly, LIIA'D USE EIEIA� t' j
• caltlornta. Number A•62!4. Caled 29 Sel)1emb1!r t961 and tt.2�F-IR i4a:
A-2483 t. salad 1 t ,tune. 1963
A r.64.1 ..
GIVEN, hill a pub!w hoary
STATE OF CALIFORNIA Wlll.behi>'tlQytheCltYCoth1.,
c1141he 0 .:st Huntlnptdrl
County of Orange o�a�< tio�c. •o..nrn�o co•vw 6Qyfi cf)',`itl,'the"Ceullell
o• r�r .n,o.. y wi r ;aril C trtror; Or',Ihe-'C!v!Q
w�lh '0 cot.CoNr"M .•au+ id , 'that*
Otin t y 1
6 Beach,
1i'aonnthaftaher.e�po
1A�ti r=rl�Alohdar,the 61h dl i
I am a Citlzen of the United States anu a resldont of 'f'tIOMO1,70f . ta��lar'the
twrpMa.at -0W&Wda►�n 'it
the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen 4Andi eam,tandtr0t, e
�.tlnd Ut+o1ai+ttM'0ti.trio
General Platt LVE ti4-il,
years, and not a party !o or interested in the below vlronrilenlnl,linpect'ta4por}
13 h 7-Orla'•Colo.",ino
entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the Orange lone cese e4ae
cltrdelihrbrlol�tnQ Itsmr',',..
Coast DAILY PILOT. with which is combined the Acet'21'�G oale.a said
WiSte Faclxty;rind use cat
NEWS-PRESS, a newspaper of general circulation, way
�� ;;.,Area-2 'Add" Polity
printed and published In the City of Costa IiAesa, tdnovd e-lt:th'e`Lerill:Ulq'
N^ EJoment,estabul r �;cw
County of Orange, State Gt California. and that a �� ca 3ya�on` r, r .
Notice of Land Use ELear,ent taf'LandUa`Pls'rt_;'t�.:,�;i
`'Areit'y3.1'= Aodtsigdalp
�i,65"d_uua3:fci0�rbd.wWt.'ct
� NIcIt4lf�Btroet,and'apMnks
fhetofy+,ltg8p;teet'aotlhr-'of
-- wwaltnel"C�Ntue•:'ffom'Qer1-
of which copy attached hereto is a true and complete tstsllrt+f af�oVJl- eats
copy, was printed and published in the Costa Mesa, y
W � 4�atr�tocalbQ:Mrast-�tf.
Newport Beach. Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, aaaVlbel +t'�ntlepOrotc•
p 9 lmt►tar�:�<C4.atpft',AeSt..,,ot
Irvine, the South Coast communities and La una wa o0rnd (rAl I J cite`
5 ordl�otnntiefclit In� ltted
GYdo at,�MQNE•CA5
Beach issues of said newspaper for 1 time ' �pyul }�rd
tlil�neib ties p i�
llronl(o
RgM.r. l WKXvXt o wit the issue(s) of �_ga,�ove,u�ee tncQ
Arol�•anat:t7te;rrct)'to:�
�ate '�Oh`oa'W1y(3a11-
n(lAl•ota'dc1)".+ind.trly�Y:�•
fiistrkle d";�et{tApnutl�
October 26 198 41m oPtde'
198 arid, 1 - o t at
�utJr� `C�r1�' rt•
±r�loyr�tanpLe ��,
-cro�;l C1tiq= eobl��'pt
tShil�l.�Dettal � ta;
nl�►t,:Zo C
198 14ealoroio 4,4 k '
e 5 ty
CIA�fdWillil�Caei��tt�t}n���
HJgtsrfsyx3rit v;
C a `tr'#t)f`:!Thi►rr"sR" °Gorrw
I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the . d Y
foregoing is true and correct.
.
. ' o�►t:� •�t AMU'
ecuted on October 26 4 :�► �"
at Costa Mes r California,
fi9r' t'L �
SignatClre
ri
v.
Otto 4 ,40h
�_/ ' llrlai� its r.Mkk ~Ali
Jiftft,,..--•--- • F�u4Yt �C�ta n �paat
t ''' PROOF OF PUBLIC TION Pilot o t" tt►ja
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Date October}� NCtL
Z.
V tyy 1.
Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council '��'�Apti
Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson , City tidminis
Prepared by: James W. Palin, Director . Develops uv"ice p''r
Subject: ZONE CHANGE NO. 84-•10 (TN CONJUNCTION WITH LAND USE
ELEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 84--42 , AREA 3 . 2)
ORD. I* gm q 0 (�W/- C�'%) VJ ,0 O"r
Sta-ment of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, FuncIng Soerce, Alternetive Actions, Attachments: C..
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
Transmitted for your consideration is Zone Change No. 84-10 , a
request by Li"dborg-Dahl-Hoels.:her/Guggenheim to rezone
approximately 7 . 11 acres of property from (0) R5 (Qualified Office
Professional ) to R3 (Medium High Density Residential) and 3 . 29 acres
of property from (Q) R5 to MI-A (Restricted Manufacturing ) . The
s'u:ijeQt property is located on the Nest side of Magnolia Street
approximately 450 feet north of Warner Avenue .
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the zone change
request on October lb , 1984 .
On motion by Livengood and second by Higgins Zone Change No. 84-10
tras approved to (Q ) R3 and (0) MI-A with the following conditions on
the "Q" , and recommended to the City Council for adoption by the
following votes
AYES: Higgins , Winchell , Livengood, Porter , Erskine ,
S%.-huntacher , Mir jahangir
NOES : None
ABS ENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Conditions on "Q" :
1 . hny future development will be subjecr to approval of a
Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission .
2 . At the time of development the project shall be required to
cover the flood control channel between Magnolia Street and
warner Avenues.
3 . The proposed project shall be designed and layed out to be
compatible with the adjacent single family reside-ntia7 tract
to the west.
no sill
0
4. The project entrance off Magnolia Street shall be designed to
City standards and cosnparAble with the adjacent commercial
center to the south .
5 . The project shall address the closure of Conner Drive to the
satisfaction of the City' s Fire Lepartnent.
6 . The area zoned MI-A shall be limited to minx-storage uses .
FINDIAGS :
1 . The R3 and MI-A zoning would be consistent with the Mixed Use
designation in Land Use Elemen c Amendment No . 84-2 .
2 . Rezoning the site to accommodate apartments and
mini-warehouses would be compatible with surrounding land
use.:, .
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff is recommending denial of Area 3 . 2 of Land Use Element
Amendment No. 83-2. As such, staff recommends denial of concurrent
Zone Change No. 84-10 with the following findings :
1 . The proposed R3 and MI-N zoning is not consistent with the
recommended retention of the General Commercial designation
in (and Use Element Amendment No. 84-2 .
2 . Rezoning the site to accommodate mind-warehouses and
apartments would be incompatible with surrounding land uses .
ANALYSIS:
The applicant, Lindborg-Dahl--Hoelscher/Guggenreim, has requested a
redesignation of approximately 10 .4 acres of land from (Q)R5 (Qualified
Office -. Professional ) to R3 (Medium Density Residential) and MI-A
. (Restricted .Manufacturing) to accommodate a proposed mixed development
of apartments and mini--warehouses . The applicant han indicated that
th6rthatethe ahavretried year
unsus„cessfullycein office space in the City and
y Q since 1980 to market an office
development on the site . The Planning Commission , at Its Octobo� ,,16 ,
1984 ;_meeting,., concurred with the applicant' s contention that an office
designation on the site is unmarketable . They also agreed that office
development on this site would reduce the demand for office development
along - Heaich Boulevard and in the Downtown area where the City is;
actively 'promoting such development. Fbr these reasons they P?running .
Commission is recommending approval of the applicant' s request .
7 '1e area : propos ad for medium high density apartnnehts would be located
on the , 7 l acres of t`.e site and would. te 'abOtted ,by exiating
cc airwvrcial , developments on the eas t (across Magnolia Street .in Fountairs
Vailey) and south, the, San Diego Freeway on the north, and the. proposed
mini-warehouses 'on the west. Traffic generated by these adjacent uses
as well as the access problems caul;ed by the site' s close proximity to
. (1304d) --2-- RCA
the freeway would significantly impact the proposed residential
development with -poise and other environmental impacts . To help
mitigate such i . ;:ts would require extensive buffering and noise
attenuatic.n meas. es . However , it is staff ' s view that the site would
not provide a suitable living environment nor be a desirable location
for residential development even with the employment of these measures .
The minx-warehouse development is intended to be located on the west
3 . 3 acres of the site. The purpose behind the proposed mini.-warehouse
development and Ml-A zoning is to provide a buffer between the proposed
medium hig:i density apartments and the existing low density single
family neighborhood to the west . However , the proposed warehouses and
MI-A zoning constitutes an industrial use , and it would be spot
planning and zoning to place such a use in an area surrounded by
reside7.tial uses . Warehouses should most appropriately be restricted
to identified industrial areas in the City, i .e . , the Central
ir_d+is tr ial Corridor and the northwest Industrial Parks adjacent to the
McDonnell-Douglas complex. Given the character of the surrounding land
!ises, the existing R5 zoning designation would be the most appropriate
use of the site .
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS :
The environmental izipacts of Zone Change Nc . 84-10 are addressed in
Environmental Impact Report No. 84-3 which also covers Land Use Element
:.,nendment No . 84--2 . The City Council must approve EIR No. 84-3 before
appzoving this zone change .
ALTERDIATIVE ACTION:
If the City Council approves the applicant ' s request for Area 3 . 2 of
Land U,se Element Amendment No . 84-2 , the Council may adopt Zone Change
No. 84-10 with a "0" on the zoning . Staff would recommend that the
conditions be divided between the two proposed zoning designations as
follows :
Conditions on "0" Ml-A:
1 . Any future development will be subject to approval of a
Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission .
2. At the time of development the project shall be required to
cover the flood control channel between Magnolia i treet and
Warner Avenues .
3 . The proposed project shall be designed and layed out to be
compatible with the adjacent single family residential, tract
to the west .
4 . The project shall address the closure of Conner Drive to the
satisfaction of the C:ity' s Fit , Deparr-ment.
5 . The area zoned Ml-A shall be limited to mini-storage uses .
(1304d) -3- RCA
Conditions on "a" R3 :
1 . Any future development will be subject to approval of a
Conditional User Permit by the Planning Commission.
2. At the time of development the project shall be required to
cover the flood control channel between Magnolia Street and
Warner Avenues .
3 . The proposed project shall be designa d and laved out to be
compatible with the adjacent single family residential tract
to the west .
4 . The project entrance off Magnolia .itreet shall be designed to
City standards and compatible with the adjacent commercial
center to the south.
ATTACHMENTS :
i
1 . Staff Report dated October 16, 1984
2 . Ordinance
I
JWP :HS :ajh
II
. (1304d) -4- RCA 11-5-84
•
\\\
J j � `
� t Ri RI a RI R1 P.1 I! Rt Rt At �Rt�Rr� Rt
Kr I S Rf RI r
Rl
'
C4 . Rt Rt RI
�- t•r� s
all al, ,
pl i ..RI •t
t :Rti9� Ri ,�! k: '3 pl �' Ni l3! Rt • 1 1 .RI_ - 1 J 1 1 } qt - 1 I o
IL
ij
i+r.cis,t -s (.< ,...et' r' _A .... Rt 1', aI (�.)R.S V �
Rl
!� a� -G'F— �� 1- R3 tL
Rt` ! ` `.•RI t - '.`__:r.----!' i
# r1 t
e ! C t !� ! 2 ra.,• a i RI RI
t7IT
,�� (3 r gas._■ to
` rEE
l
I`!
Jr
ze s io
Nlt*11'11Vt.TQ!{tif�Llt
HUNTINGTON REACH PLANN114G DIVISION
i
i
huniington beach development services department
STAf f
EPOR-L
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Development Services
i
DATE: October 16, 1984
SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE NO. 04-10
(IN CONJUNCTION WITH LUE 84-2, Area 3 . 2 )
I .
I
APPLICANT: Lindborg-Dahl DATE ACCEPTED:
Hoelscher/Guggenheim July 11 , 1984
17220 Newhope St. #226
Fountain Valle}, CA 92708
REQUEST: To rezone approximately MANDATORY PROCESSING LATE:
7 .11 acres of property Not Applicable
from (0) R5 (Qualifier?
Office Professional ) to R3
Medium tii h Density
� 9 Y
Residential ) , and 3 . 29
acres of property from (Q)
R5 (Coal i fied Office
Professional ) to MI-A
( Restricted Manufacturing )
LOCATION: Subject property is located ZONE:
west of Magnolia Street and Q R5 (Office
approximately 450 feet Professional)
north of Warner Avennue.
ACREAGE: 10.4 GENERAL PLAN:
General Commercial
EXISTING USE:
Agr cultural Greenhouses
1 .0 SUGGESTED ACTION:
Staff recommends that the planning Commission. deny Zone Change ho .
84'-1.0.
260 GENERAL INFGRMATION:too j
Initiated by Lin dborg-Dahl-Hoelscher/Guggenheim, Zone Change boo.
84-10 As a re :;ues t to 'rezone the property located west of Magnolia
Street and apk- oxtmately 450 feet north of Warner Avenue from (Q?fie
JJJ.
(Qualified Office Professional ) to R3 (Medium High Density
Residential ) and M1-.A (Restricted Manufacturing) . This zone change
is being considered concurrently with Land Use Element Amendment No .
84 -2 , Area 3 . 2 .
3 .0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS :
The subject property is addressed in draft Environmental Impact
Report No. 84-3 for L.61E 84-2 which is being processed concurrently
with this zone- change . Pursuant to the environmental regulations in
effect at this time, the Department of Development Services posted
draft Environmental Impact Report No . 84--3 for a 45-day comment and
review period which ended October 12 , 1984 .
4 .0 SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING, AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS :
Sub jec t Property:
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial
ZONE: (Q)R5 (Qualified Gffice Professional )
LAND USE: Agricultural Greenhouses
North of Subject Property:
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low L'ensity Residential
ZONE: Ct-E (Community Facility--Educational )
LAND USE: Elementary School/Freeway
East of Subject Property(City of Fountain Valley) :
GENERAL. PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial Recreation
ZONE: Commercial Recreation
LAND 'USE: Amusement Park/Motel
South . of Subject Property :
GENERAI, PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial
ZONE: C2 (Community Business District )
LAND USE: Shopping Center
West of Subject Property:
'GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density ,Residential
ZONE: R1 . (Low Density Residential )
LAND USE' Single-family hohies
5 .`0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS:
The applicant, Lindborg--Dahl-floe lscher/Gil jenheitn, has requested a
zedesignatlon of approximately 10.4 acres of land from (Q) R5 �(pualifio_
Office Professional ) to R3 (Medium tie'hatty Residential ) and Ml;-A"
(Restricted, Manufacturing) . to accommodate a proposed mixed deyelopir-ent
of apartments and mini -warehouses . The irea proposed for medluv. high
density apartments would be located on the east 7. 1 acres of the site
i
and. would be abutted by existing commercial developments on the east
(across Magnolia Street in Fbuntain Valley) and south , the San Diego
Freeway on the north, and the proposed mini-warehouses on the west .
Traffic generated by these adjacent uses as well as the access rroblems
caused by the site ' s close proximity to the freeway would significantly
impact the proposed residential development with noise and other
environmental impacts . To help mitigate such impacts would require
extensive buffering and noise attenuation measures . However , it is
staff ' s view that the site would not provide a suitable living
environment nor be a desirable location for residential development
even with the employment of ' these measures.
The mini-warehouse development is intended to be located on the west.
3.3 acres of the site . The purpose behind the proposed mini-warehouse
development and Ml-A zoning is to provide a buffer between the proposed
medidi: high density apartments and the existing low. density
single-family neighborhood to the west . However , the proposed
warehouses and MI-A zoning constitutes an industrial use, and it would
be spot planning and zoning to place such a use in an area surrounded
by residential uses . Warehouses should most appropriately be
restricted to .identified industrial areas in th.e . City, i .e . , the
Central -Industrial Corridor and the northwest Industrial Parks adjacent
to the McDonnel.l-Douglas complex . Given the character of the
surrounding land uses , the existing RS zoning designation r,ould to the
most appropriate use of the site .
6 .0 RECOMMENDATION:
I
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny 'Lone Change No .
84 -10 with the following findings after action has been taken an Lanza
Use Element Amendment No . 84-2 .
FINDINGS:
1 . The R3 and ' M1-A zoning would be inconsistent with the
recommended retention of the commercial designation in Land Use
Element Amendm:,:it Nu. 84-2 .
2 . Rezoning the site to accommodate apartments and min:-war. ehouees
would be incompatible with surrounding land uses .
ATTACHMENTS :
1 . Area Map
2 . Ordinance
JWP:CC:a'jh
(1266d) -3- Staf t heport 10-16-84
• AdverII$OmaniIN,, kinds Including Public j�PIis101—GIN-0 �c
thtt SuCenor Cm�rt of Orange Gounty, LAND Ut31;ELENI'.ttT:
1214 Baled 79 SeDterlbnr t961 an0 ; 44.2-0111 SQ
1963 h
4119MIRMS"11,
YC. '
A GIYEN that a P�bl;c hearing
' wIII Us held by the Cfty Cwn-
- cll Of the Oly'if Huntftton
JL+ ! �„p,• ►.o�K. •n.•nlr�p co.x�o RobCrtl ;U� (h8"COurlttl
o. Inn IF1148.1 n Sol n ► vain Chamber•'of, th(v.Civic
' I «rn r0 pc�col„mn w•e►� �� at C��lur ,NUI+t on 't'3each,
r t;In hour o11:30 P.M..or
il
at tirbn IQartiaftttf ss,pa s-
1 +1`le'We on IAofWey�thy'60%date
.� a ClUzen of the United Slates and a resident of 'Q �Q
�f puc�x+;,a(f cxA�ldorjnp r'a
the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen f r4=Uw-.Ehmrnt of the'
01 land•'U�e:f�rttonr of rho
(IM&W Pllq(LUP 44t3).1in-
years, and not a party to or interested in the below \' 0 1 vi►tnrneittll,Impact'rupok
l rf A443.'-'Zone'•Care,'54-p land
entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the Orange �"i zone Casr'e4-10•rwh!ch-h-
GU AM the fallotitiriq Ittems:
Coast DAILY PILOT, with which is combined the Ole N p .s.1.1*Or"letf-iol{d
Waite F&Wittr.Iand;iO ",t
AIEWS•PRESS, a newspaper of general circulation, pert• i:� �.• �fp
I Ara 'L�.',-rAdd or1C)i
printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa, X hei►otte4o' to IAo Lahti Use
Elanr!nt'•etlahllt:Nn
County of Orange. State of California. and that a %X '►etey.,wl:h'-the.$rahQs
Land Use Element r AlrpA 1411ji Plan:Vsafen'~
Notice of r tat la 1,
- - � Al '�l►tar'2.1 �" Aads�l�naits
65 aCieb locrit90 \rest.
- --- t' t!►tliollBUetrf aAd"otfprox-
Imatity IX00;tee''6uth or
Wamvr,�V,irws�fromOen-
of which copy attached hereto is a true and complete eralindtlstctalta5o114Wastrr<
copy, was printed and published in the Costa Mesa, �� �• 'Aterdiwwt-of
y \ 10:/'acrse'localed�wwt ;at
Newport Beach, Huntington Beach Fountain Valley, �V1 ;Moc^�ttaslraaeGrht'aot�oz-
1 ` lmatety:,150
Irvine, the South. Coast communities and Le g una loelet'l,
stal "6mjn "° r'4"'�°e^'
9 erW'Commaq`t'410 •M►iled
1 t:ime 6111A ONE- GF.Beach issues of said newspaper for
iu'ta oil pro�orty
RgMX"ixQ:"W"o wit the Issuo(s) of trom(Q ntgluatriedAf}lce
Ptafe4e octal, . eta",(o1 R7
r t�4odium.Nlph • tylPeW-
aeRJaf°tkatr(ctZ?nr►d A�trq}
faottHct�o°�Ma,iqq a"ciu,lnp:l
DfiIUl;I) The R,arI q tarn
nlitlanC It . October tb,.
-Qct,ober 26 198 t913,t0'Pub N Wih�,..�t�
3dt d d th o`�,�'
k! � rift Ina
P
A'w llsctlydi
198 Mtkir+�condtt"a�dn;+
►oloprnabt of"I i�yftd; °
_!(ore"Via l�itld1{IIY
A> IOU
34 et a�p.
♦\ �� �cr tc I�ott,�w
adt7!t6k
`` Wit tr�tterAq�aitttll'p
lib o"Ji4-rti 1_ ti Mai
rn:Oana►IY pasblOnfinld:�`
sC. 111111 MloDkt:
eslp ttl
rbf+t:ft2!'if+4egt4hls,Der1>ft
py f3aloenllfi ,aitrlpRia-c, '
1 ie,
I declare, tinder penaty of perjury, that the ,a�.lrieaan¢n�c�►trrt��.
Wth,t.ri:,Q' bttnikiq on
foregoing is ti-:ie and correct. A�oRoi '.,a-.2 4,1910
r 26 4 e�t+rtwtp y'�t!yltr
Oct b e 'errstt'r Mail r l
Executed on , 198 _.._ /�,•��;.A,yunt,, � ' ,
�t� 114nad,(0'Aft11f�'I�IQ}�•t
at Costa Mes , California. in�!�.i;e 4,irpfaoa:ar,r"i
1 W4 for,he N[tW L
lin(.44 fin'
---� Signa4Gre t' e1 ��• r< �, „ 's
��
tie abt rtfct fratlr(trla,OMot'
IW IM,�tty Cloit�.>ttJ04'I�firM
aI
19tra>et;r wit tr�t'.18ssctt;
ICak10 "la '.:Rt��
k6ic:9 i7 t,N ;,,��
ae r bhr
;aly rota TO •
�hFw��CCftOfrf i��~I
4Q4,"C:�at
' , PROOF OF PUSLICAI tOK `roe,tyPitoI°n0t"114 i�°4,t
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Dates October tobar 26, 1984
Submitted to: Honorable Mayor : nd City Council
Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson , City Administrato •
Prepared by: James W. Pal in , Director , Development Seri/ices p '
•
Subject: ZONE CHANGE NO. 64--10 ( IN CONJUNCTION WITH LAND U6 i;
Ei EMENT AMENDMENT NO. 84-2 , AREA 3 .2)
o * n q o
Statement of Issue, Rewrnr.,endetion, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments:
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
i
Transmitted for your consideration is Zone Change Nc. 84-10 , a
request by Lindborg-Pahl-Hoelscher/Guggenheim to rezone
approximately 7 . 11 acres of property from (0) R5 (Qualified Office
Professional ) to R3 (Medium High Density Residentia.- ) and 3 . 29 acres
of proparty from (0) R5 to Mcl-A (Restricted Manufacturing) . The
subject property is located on the west side of Magnolia Street
aPproximately 450 feet north of Warner Avenue .
LANNING COMMISSION ACTION AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the zone change
request on October 16 , 1984.
On motion by Livengood and second by Higgins Zone Change No . 84--10
was approved to (0) R3 and (0) Val-A with the following conditions on
the "01', and recommended to the City Council for adoption by the
following vote :
AYESf Higgins, Winc bell, Livengood, Porter , Erskine ,
Schuracher, MirjahanQir
NOES : None
ABSENTS None
ABSTAIN: None
Conditions on "0" :
1 . Any , future development will be subject to approval of a
Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission.
2 . At 'the time of development the project ✓shall, be required to
cover the flood control channel between Magnolia Street- and
Warner Avenues . ,
^he p:ropvsed project &ball be designed and layed out to be
comps tilalc: with the adjacent cirgle family residential tract
to the west.
t
i
4 . The project entrance off Magnolia Strer.t shall be designed to
City standar6s and compatible with the adjacent commercial
center to the south .
5 . The p:- jject stall address the closure of Conner Drive to the
satisfaction of the City' s Fire Department.
6 . The area zoned 141-A shall be 1 .mited to mini-storage uses .
FINDINGS :
1 .
The R3 and MI-A zon_i nr- would be cons:s tent with the Mixed Use
designation in Land Use Element Amendment No. 84--2 . '
2 . Rezoning the site to accommodate apartments and
mini.-warehouses would be compatible with surrounding land
uses.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff is recommending denial. of Area 3 . 2 of Land Use Element
Amendment No. 33-2 . As such , staff recommends denial of concurrent
Zone Change No . 84-10 with the following findings :
1 . The proposed R3 and Ml-A zoning is not consistent with the
recommended retention of the General Commercial designation
in (and Use Element Amendment No . 84-2 .
2 . Rezoning the site to accumnodste mini-warehouses and
apartments would be incompatible with surrounding land uses .
ANAL:SIS :
The applicant,, Lin-borg-Dahl-Hoelscher j Guggenhe:,m, ha 3 requested a
,redesignation of approximately 10 .4 acres of land from MR5 (Qualified
Office Professional) to R3 (Medium Density Residenti; 1 ) and MI-A
( restricted Manufacturing ) to accommodatu a proposed mixed development
of apartments and mini-warehouses . The applicant has indicated that
there is a three year surplus of vacant.- office space in the City rind
that they have tried unsuccessfully since 1980 to market an office
development on the site . The Planning Commission , at. i. ts , October 16 ,
1984 meeting , concurred with the applicant' s contention that an office
designation on the site is unmarketable . They also agreed that office
development on this site vould reduce the demand for office development
along much Boulevard and in the r.uwntu.::n area where the City is
actively, promoting such development. For these reasons_ the planning
Commission is recommending approval of the applicant' s request .
The area proposed for medium high 6%ne i ty apartments would be located
on the east 7. 1 acres. of the site and would be abutted by sxiisting
commcr.ial developments on the east (across Magnolia Street :in Fountain
Valley) and sou�:ho the San Diego FreeNa� , an the north# and t1he propose,-
mini-warahouses on the west. Traffic generated by these adjacent uses
as well as the access problems caused by the site' s close proximity to
(i304d) -2- RCA
freeway w:,uld s tgt, if. icantiy impact the iroposed residential
Odevelopment with noir•-? aria other environr:ental impacts . Tc: help
miticate .;U--h impacts %,tauld require extor.siv,: buffering and noise
attenuatior r,�easu es . Ho.%ever. , it is staf: fI -; view that the site would
not .provide a suitable living environment no:. be a desirable location
for residential dr;!v,�iopment even with the employment of these cneas4res .
The mini -•warehe7ose development is intended to be located on the west
3 . 3 acres of she site . The purpose behind the prop-sod mini--warehouse
developmen '- and Ml-•n zoniry is to provide a buffer between tLe proposed
medium high density apartments eAnd tho existing low density single
family nelobbo;hood to the west . However , the propose6 warehov:;es and
.S1-c: zoni. r.g coristitzl ! an industrial use , and it would be spot
nlanning ana zonlr,- to place suc;1 F. use in an area surrounded by
residential uses . Warehouses should most appropriately be rostric- ',ed
to -identified industrial areas in the City, i .e . , the Central
7ndu5 .rial. Corridor and f-he northwest Industrial Parks adjacent to the
McDonnell -Douglas complex . Giti� n ! %e characta.- of the surrounding lane
uses , the existing R5 zoning designation wulili be the most appropriate
I use of the site .
ENVIRON,4EI"rAL STATUS :
The environmental impacts of 'Lone Change No . 84-10 are addressed in
Environmental Impact Report No. 8, -3 which also covers Land Use Element
Amendment No . 84-2 . The City Council must approve EIR No . 84 -3 before
approving this zone change .
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
If the City Co'u;;cil approves the applicant ' s request for Area 3 . 2 of
"Land Use Element Amendment No. 84-2 , the Council may adopt Zone Change
No . 84-10 wig t.1 a "0" on the zoning . Staff would recommend that t::e
conditions be divided bhtGween the two proposed zcning designa:ions as
follows :
Conditions on "0" M1-A:
1 . Any future drvelnpment will. be subject to approval of a
Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission .
2 . At the time of development the project shall be required to
cdver the flood control channel between Magnolia Street and
Warner Avenues .
3 . The proposed project shall be designed and layed out to be
compatible with the adjacent single family residential tract
to the wa.s t .
d . The pr;o ject shall address the c7os;lre of Co::.ner Drive to the
satisfaction of the City' s Fi,xe 7epartmei:t .
5 . The area zoned Vl-it stall be limited to mini -storage uses .
(:1304dj -3-- "CA
Conditions on "G" h3 :
i Anf future development will be subject to approval of a
Conditional User Permit by the Planning commission .
2 . At the time of development ; ' project shall be required to
cover the flood control channel between Magnolia Strut and
Warner Avenues .
3 . The proposed project shall be saes igred and layea out to be
compatible with the arijacer. t single family residential tract
to the west .
4 . The pro-ect entrance off Magnolia Street shall be designed to
city standards and compatible with the adjacent commercial
center to the south .
ATTACHMENTS :
1 . S ;.a,`f Report dated October 16, .11)84
i . c t d: a�ance
.
JW�-� . HS : aih
l t 104 ti I
1 1 �Fh 41 Isl Ai Fr! RI t— Al R3 ail
C41y z! -
JAL Ia�.--'``_- -- --1��__�'L�r�__ � _ ; �...--� � `�•-%==� ? � --. },, _, - ,
• •� �• � CHI 1 � FI 9. `•
A L
.01
P1
et
HUNTINGTON BEACH PL4NtiiNG DIVISION
.fie
huntington beach development services department
STA t t 0
TO: Planning Commission
FROM : Development Services
DATE;: Oc `ober 16 , 1984
SUB-iC." . ZONE CHANGE: NO. 84-10
( IN CONJUNCTION WITH LUE 64 -2 , Area 3 . 2 )
APPLICANT: Linuborg-Dahl DATE ACCEPTED:
Hoelscher/Guggenheim July 11 , 1984
17220 Newhope St. # 22G
Fountain Valley , CA 92708
REQUEST: To rezone approximately MANDATORY PROCESSING CATE :
7 . 11 acres of property Not Applicable
from (Q ) R5 (Qualified
Office Professional ) to R3
(Medium }sigh Density
Residential ) , and ? . 29
acres of property from (0 )
R5 (Cualified office
Professional ) to MI -A
( Restricteu Manufacturing )
LOCATION : Subject property is located ZONE.:
wept of Magnolia Street and (Q) R3 (Office
approximately 450 feet Professional )
north of warner Avennue .
ACREAGE: 10 .4 GENERAL PLAN :
General Commercial
I
EXISTING USE:
Agricultural Greenhouses
1 . 0 SUGGESTED ACTION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commiss::on den; Zone Change No .
H4-10 .
2 ,v GENERAL INFORMATION:
Initiated by l.indborg-Lahl -Hoelscher/Guggenheitr,, Zone Change hv .
( 84-10 is a request to rezone the property located west of Magnolia
Street and apF.roximat.ell 450 feet north of warner Avenue from Mi,5
Vic I lit
- - 1� �
(Qualified Office Professional ) to R3 (Medium High Density
Residential ) and MI-A (Restricted Manufacturing ) . This zone change
is being considered concurrently with Land Use Element Arjendment No .
84--2 , Area 3 . 2 .
3 .0 iNVI FONMENTAL STATUS
The subject property is addressed in draft Environmental Impact
Report No . 84--3 for LUE. 84-2 which is being processed concurrently
with this zone- change . Pursuant to the environmental regulations in
effect at this time , the Department of Development Services posted
draft Environmental Impact. Report No . 134 -3 for a 45 -day comment and
review period which ended Octo�er 12 , 1964 .
4 .0 SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING , AND CL•NERAL PLAN LESIGNATIONS :
Subject Property•
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial
ZONE: (0 ) R5 (Qualified Gffice Professional )
LAND USE: Agricultural Greenhouses
. Nor th of Subject Property:
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION : Lw I;ensity Fesidential
ZONE: CI--L (Communi Ly Facility-Educational )
LAND USE: E!? -mentar} School/ Freeway
East of Subject Property (City of Fountain Valley ) :
GENF'RAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial Recreation
ZONE: Commercial Recreation
LAND USE: Amusement Park/Mote l
South of Subject Property:
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial
ZONE2 C2 (Community Business District )
LAND USE: Shopping Center
West of Subject Property :
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential
ZONEs.. R1 (Low Density Residential )
LAND USE: Single-family hones
5 . 0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS :
0 The applicant , Lindborg-Dahl --Hoelscher/Guggenheim, has requested C1
rr. designation of approximately 10.4 acres of land from (G) R5 (QualifinooL
Oi f ice Ptofessiona.l ) to R3 (Medium Uensi t�, Residential. ) and MI-A
(Pestricted Manufacturing ) to accommodate a proposed mixed development
of apartments and mini-warehouses . The area proposed for medium high
density apartments wou16 he located on the east 7 . 1 acres of the site ,�
and would be abutted by e:; isting cnmmercial developments on the east
(across Magnolia Street in Fountain Valley) and south , the San Diego
Freewa} on the north , and the proposed mini -warehouses on the west .
Traffic generated by these adDacent uses as well as the access probler !,
caused by the site ' s close proximity to the freeway would sign! f %cant. i }
impact the proposed residential development with noise and other
environmental impacts . To help mitigi-Ite such impacts would require,
extr:nsive. buffering and noi :;e attenu' ation measures . However , it is
staff ' s view that the sit(.-! woula not provide a suitable living
environment nc c be a desirable location for residential development
even with the employment of these measures .
The mini -warehouse development is intended to be located on the west
3 . 3 acres of the site . The Purpose behind Ckie proposed mini. -warehou".
development and MI-A zoning is to provide a buffer between the proposers
medium high density apartments and the existing low density
single-family neighborhood to the west . However , the proposed
warehouses and Ml-A zoning constitutes an industrial use , and it would
be spot planning and zoning to place such a use in an area surrounded
by zesidential uses . Warehouses should most appropriately be
restricted to identified industrial areas in the City, i .e . , the
Central Industrial Corridor and the northwest Industrial Parks ad;ace:, t
to the Mc Donne11-Douglas complex . Given the character of the
surrounding land uses , the existing R5 zoning designation would to the
most appropriate use of the site .
6 . 0 RLCOMMENDATION :
j
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny 'hone Charge N'o .
84 -10 with the following findings after action has been taken on Lana
Use Element Amendment No . 84 -2 .
FINDINGS :
1 . The R3 and MI -A zoning would be inconsistent with the
recommended retention of the commercial designation in Land Use
Element Amendment No . 84-2 .
2 . Rezoning the site to accommodate apartments and mini. --wareholjses
would be incompatible with surrounding lane uses .
ATTACINENTS :
i . Area Map
2 . Ordinance
JWP :C 1 a jh
11�
_. ( 1 il�Fir,� -- - -- - -1• -tnf f Ve-y ort
t
ORDINANCE NO .
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY UI" HUNTINGTON BEACH
AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE
BY AMENDING SECTION 9061 TO PROVIDE FOR CHANGE
OF ZONING FROM QUALIFIED OFFICE: PROFESSIONAL
DISTRICT TO QUALIFIED MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESI-
DENTIAL DISTRICT AND TO QUALIFIED RESTRICTED
MANUFACTURIP+G DISTRICT ON REAL PROPERTY GENER-
ALLY LOCATED WEST OF MAGNOLIA STREET AND NORTH
OF WARNER AVENUE (ZONE CASE NO. 84-10)
WHEREAS , pursuant to the state Planning and Zoning Law , the
Huntington Beach Planning Commission anti Huntington Beach City
Council have had separate public hearings relative to Zone Case
No. 84-1.0 wherein both bodies have carefully considered all in-
formation presented at said hearings , and after due consideration
of the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission and
all evidence presented to said City Council. , the City Council
finds that such zone change is proper , and consistent with the
general plan ,
NOW, THEREPORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington
Beach does ordain as follows :
SECTION 1 .w The following described real property, generally
located west of Magnolia Street and 450 feet north of Warner
Avenue, is hereby changed from (Q) R5, "Qualified Office
Professional District- " to (Q) R3 , "Qualified Medium High-density.
Residential District: "
PARCEL 11 (Q) R3 : Commencing at the centerline
intersection of Warner Avenue with Magnolia
Street , said centerline interjection being also
the southeast corner of Section 24 , Township 5
South , Range 11 West ; thence north 00018150"
east along the east line of said section , said
east line being also the centerline of Magnolia
10/29/84 , �Ci
-119"ad Rev.
1 .
0
Street , a distance or 516. 50 feet to the nor-
therly line of the Oranqu County Flood Control
District Channel , as recorded in Look 6409 , page
684 of official records of said county ; thence
north 89032 ' 38 " west along the northerly line
of said channel a distance of 61 . 40 feet to a
point on the westerly line of a deed to the Stag
of California as recorded in Book 6375 , page 602
of official records of said county , said point
being the true point of beginning ; thence north
89032138" west along the northerly line of said
channel a distance of 420 .77 to the beginning of
a curve concave southerly having a radius of
227 . 00 feet:; thence westerly ::long said northerly
line 27. 73 feet along said curve through a cen-
tral angle of 6059158" to Point A; thence north
00018137" east leaving said northerly line a
distance of 610 . 52 feet ; thence south 890311531
east a distance of 119 . 33 feet; thence north
00028107" east a distance of 40. 00 feet to a
point on the southwesterly line of said deed to
the State of California , said point being also on
a curve concave northeasterly having a radius of
400. 00 feet a radial line through said point
1' bears norta 54035156" east ; thence south-
easterly along said southwesterly line 81 . 95 feet
alone said curve through a central angle of
11044 . 19 " ; thence south 47008123" east along
` said southwesterly line a distance of 265 . 96 feet
to the- beginning of a curve concave southwesterly
having a radius of 200. 00 feet ; thence south-
easterly along said southwesterly line 155 . 12
feet along said curve through a central angle of
44026124 " ; thence south 02041159 " east along
said southwesterly line a distance of 337 . 23 Feet
to the true point of beginning .
subject to the following conditions :
1 . Any future development will be subject to approval by the
Planning Commission of a conditional use permit.
2. At the tim,, of development the project shall include , sub-
ject to approval by Orange County , covering the flood control
channel between Magnolia Street and Warner Avenue.
3. The proposed design and layout of the project shall be
-�- ;
compatible with the adjacent sin le ..anvil residential tract to
P ] 9 Y
2 .
7_�
the west .
4 . Access to the project shall be off Magnolia Street , shall
meet city standards and specifications , and shall be compatible
with the adjacent commercial center to the south .
SECTION 2 . The following described real property , generally
located west of Magnolia Street and 450 feet north of Warner
Avenue , is hereby changed from (Q) R5 , "Qualified Office
Professional District" to (Q) M1-A, "Qualified Restricted
Manufacturing District : "
PARCEL 2 , (Q) MI-A: Beginning at Point A , de-
scribed in Parcel 1 , said point being on the nor-
therly line of said channel , said point being
also on a curve concave southeasterly having a
radius of 227. 00 feet ; thence southwesterly along
said northerly line 175 . 98 feet along said curvy
through a central angle of 44025106" ; thence
north 00018138" east leaving said northerly
line a distance, of 889 . 30 feet to a point on the
north line o: the south half of the southeast
quarter of said section ; thence south 89031153"
east along said north line a distance of 201 . 96
I feet to a Point on the westerly line of said deed
to the State of California , said point being also
on a curve concave northeasterly having a radius
of 400. 00 feet , a radial line through said point
bears north 79001123 " east ; thence south-
easterly along said westerly line 170 . 51 feet
along said curve through a central angle of
24025127" ; thence south 00028107 " west
leaving said westerly line a distance of 40 . 00
feet; thence north 89031153" west a distance of
119 . 33 feet; thence south 00018137" west a
distance of 610 . 52 feet to the point of beginning ,
subject to the following conditions ;
1 . Any future development shall be subject to approval by the
Planning Commission of a conditional use permit.
2 . At the time of development , the project shall include ,
subject to approval by Ornnge County, covering the flood control
channel between rlagnolia Street and Warner Avenue .
3 . The proposed deFign and layout of the project shall be
3 .
MBA
compatible with the ad]acent single--family residential tract to
the west.
h . The Fire Department shall specify the means by which com-
plete or partial closure of Conner Drive shall be accomplished .
5 . The area zoned MI-A shall. be limited to mini-storage uses .
SECTION 3 . Section 9061 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance
Code , District Map 27 ( Sectional District Map 24-5--11) , is hereby
amended to reflect the change contained in this ordinance and or)
the map attached hereto . The Director of Development Services i ,
hereby directed to prepare and file an amended map . A copy of
said district map , as amended hereby , is available for inspection
in the office of the City Clerk .
SEC IGN 4 . This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after
its passage .
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the
P' day of 1984 .
Mayor
ATTEST: _ APPROVED AS TO FOR14 :
City Clerk City Attornzy �
REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED:
City Administrat r 61 lir-�ec-tEo—�ir7-6-f—ffeve'-opmen't
Services
w �.
I • . � IAI
PLANNING ZONING D 1Y,
I
SECTIONAL D1S T R ► CT MAP 24 -5 - 1 1 ---
NOT(
t,f10►T10 rIMN/. J'1, I♦„ •.1 Pa+.1a•.1 .•. »m• '
COVrtU CfOn.Ir!I IIQ 1�1 ' Itac .r
w�w•.a•••• r
Clrfly
I 1 ••.r.•IQ{NIL.;.�:. �.na«•s.. _• w
S•17 1. a al/ 1.1/.�t/•wut/1
I
T IrTBCYT �{ /fs • r.b1 t0Q
V L� � �jT ./..1. 1.�C�� ro2•/, J•n Il,o 2 r 'c{ w�tr,•: .,«'r ..,,J ••..• �... i/•• n rr. !•./ r II.12 Jlr /r• ;
OR A N G E C(1 l' N T 1' C A 1r 1 �1'O H �N l A ; If.t• ,�ral. :.; InM I. r M
1 �-r1•If •V�nfti �:2. �r•[f r1,._r n.Ir�••••�, +'
♦ f I 1• �/11C,A ll/)� 1•II '••Ir•11•..h• •.
• • I•N UO PA• ( IJ sw•IlnH•..l•..
It f r• fry :rna
f • .� •r�1 rS:
r S /rl•+trlglln 1�Irhr IIrt�G
.I rar•q •.wr ar a•.
r»I •r • • ,••rlr 1
`•.�,'� JI 1. +_.. ... - �! -------___._^. _�,_�__. _J I-
I
II
I ' If r `'•4 7 �"�f� i
II1l I-scC 2 I� 1 lr` (Y ,_
J Pit, R
it
j'i a •�I ��I�+^ f'��J~1��___` � ' Rl�r ��t�y..•.-' .{.
I "I I Ij IC f��i "J .H rr.1.• �' 4
RI AI RI If( R1 RI At L
RI RI RI IRI RI RI r R1I .Cftu it
f
�... � S �'� I , e • L
1♦f f II f °' k I R 1
RI pl h I
' ;( _..�..� ' Jt10No•--cam♦ 1 I p) .mot. J. pt r va► ca ���
I j Ilavfrr a. ! i I Rf I j
C4 R1
1p ' Y Rt �91e CF—E
R1 At
'; t Ili
I (wow I .,..•w. I� ,. 1 •. [
I I •..I I. J 1 J
M M
I � , 1•i 1 �� ��, lr ; ; M• 1 ..� � ••�
C(� RIB{ RI ' � RI �9I Rt \I! RI '�, R2 1,i 1 j I 1 I+ RI i:r.:.
�~ f r1 ' � 1 -•« sl ' rJL.r R I .��•� 1 R r,
�� 1• H �r l
/ r+fcNilt^1IL�j1r� ��_.�:aT• o. ►�,�•1�' M RI 1 r RI ,� R5 1 1 t
��.nrralJ_._._-• ,, _ _. R!. , . I_.___. RI __ RI I r [-
W.rj JAW,
CF`E �j (� p' (° Iq IAI 1 RIB ���/ cu3
•r �
� . .e_•' L�jR3 f't'n�+ Is f-:'rr:S },,Q� rua+v pn )< RI 11RJ� r ' '•
13
WARN[w Avt to
ZONE CHANGE NO. 84-10
to