HomeMy WebLinkAboutZone case 84-24 - Shell Oil Company - Southeast corner of Ed 121 Zane Changes ZC 84--14 — Ord 2792 — s/e corner Edwards St and
Bolsa Aver/6502 Bolsa rive — 1985
i
i
a
.i
Aulhor1160 to Publish Advorlisam ets of ail hod$InCludirIV pubhC
nolic&% by Decree of the Supettor Court of orange County,
California. Number A-6214. Called 29 September. 1941, and
A-24631. dated 11 June. 1963.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of Orange putw( 101" &4-ww" tow*$
e* V" M YM w r pork
•sm tp pK!cok~Ww00
I am a Citizen of the Unitcid States and a resident of
the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen
years, and not a party to or interested in the tmlow
entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the Orange
Coast DAILY PILOT, with which is combined the
NEWS-PRESS, a newspaper of general circulation,
printed and published in the City of Costa !Mesa,
County of Orange. State of California. and that a
Notice of Ptah l i r_ 11 ea r i n cj -
of which copy attached hereto is a true and complete
copy. wss printed and published in the Costa Mesa.
Newport Beach, Huntington Beach. Fountain Valley,
Irvine, the South Coast communities and Laguna13
time
86SCh ISsues of said newspaper for
eanatvkveK**oAa to wit the Issue(s) of
Augunt 8
. .;ittt►1 1�'.
r
'
tg8
y,_
declare, under penalty of perjury, that the
foregoing is true and correct-
August B s
Executed-',on 1198
et Cost esa, California.
.5(ynature � s ,
I'.1 y
u
REQUE �� l�OR CITY COI.INGIL�" `Tlt ►N
i
Date ALi gll g t t a . - t R.B.S....__
Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Submitted by: Charles W Thompson , City Administrator
Prepared by: James W. Palin, Director , Development Services � D D
' Sab;ect: ZONE CHANGE hO. 84--14 /1p<�
V
Consistent with Council Policy? ( . Yes ( ] New Policy or Exception
Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Sourco, Altemative Actions, Attw:hments:
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
Transmitted for your consideration is Zone Change No . 84-14 , a
request to add the service station nuf`ix ( Article 948 ) to the
existing base zone of C4 , Highway Commercial . The applicant intends
to demolish the existing service station on the site and construct a
convenience market combined with a new service station, the SS
suffix is required in order to permit the new construction .
i
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission and Staff recommend that the City Council
approve zone Change No . 84-14 by the adoption of the attached
ordinance and Negative Declaration No. 84-28 .
Planning Commission action on July 16, 1985 :
ON MOTION BY PORTER AND SECOND BY FRSKINE, ZONE CHANGE NO. 84-14 AND
NEGATIVE DECLARATION 110. 84-28 'WERE APPROVED WITH FINDINGS BY THE
FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: -we, Schumacher , Livengood , Erskine , Porter ,
rjahangir
NOES: done
ABSENT: Winchell
ABSTAIN : None
FIND111GS FOR APPROVAL:
1 . A change of zone from C40 Highway Comriercial District , to
C4-SS , Highway Commercial District - Service Station , is
consistent with the General Plan designation of General
Commercial and intent and purpose of Article 948.
2 . The proposed zone change is compatible with surrounding
Commercial uses.
f
r
P10 4/84
", 1
ANALYSIS:
In July of 19'14 , applications were filed to rebuild an existing
service station with a food mart, detached car wash and to add the
zone suffix -SS. The applications were subsequently rejected in
that the existing service station location was not in compliance
with the locational criteria . The criteria in Effect at that time
required service stations to be located at the intersection of major
acid/or primary highways .
The service station operator initiated Code Amendment No. 84-21 to
amend the locational criteria . This Code Amendment to Article 948
has been approved by the Planning Commission and adopted by the City
Council and became effective July 3 , 1985 . The amendment will
permit a service station site to be located at the intersection of a
secondary highway ( Edwards ) and any other highway (8olsa ) provided
that two of the three remaining corners are zoned and general ;.
planned commercial . Tha applicant 's request compliep with this new
provision in that the nor ,.heast corner is within the Westminster
Mall and the southwest corner (within Huntington nea.;h ) is zoned and
developed as commercial . A conditional use permit for new service
station development is required at this location per the new
locat~ional criteria of the code amendment .
A new development proposal , Conditional Use Permit No. 84-24 ,
consisting of a convenience market combined with gasoline station
and a small detached building for office and rest:rooms , was approved
by the Planning Commission on August 51 1985 .
ENVIRONMENTAI. STATUS:
I
Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time ,
the Department of Development Services posted draft Negative
Declaration No . 84 -221 for ten days , and no comment, either verbal or
written were received. The staff, in its initial study of the
project, has recommended that: a negative declaration he issued.
Prior to any action on ;1nne Change No. 84 -14 , it is Necessary for
the City Council to review and act on Negative Declaration No . 84-26 .
FUNDING SOURCE:
trot applicable
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
The City Council may consider denying Zone Change Vo. 84-14 which
Mould preclude demolition and reconstruction of a convenience market-
combined with gasoline station .
ATTACHMENTS: !
I
1 . Minutes of July 16, 1985 Planning Commission Meeting
2. Staff Reports , dated June 18 and July 16 , 1985
3. Negative Declaration
4 . Ordinance
JWP: SP:k1a `
RCA - August 19 , 1985 2 (3018d )
4
V
0"q
40 two^. ,aft, 1(gitu at 3mrstintivater
CIVIC CI N If it
117(11 WI !;I A;I4':11 II NUiII IVAIH)
14 (:01)1 hRy '1311
,tune 10 , 1985 l--!UNTING T ON BEACH
D VELOP;NiENT SERVICES
Planning Department G 0C.x 1^�
City of Huntington Beach N� tin{;t;�n j-iejch. CA 92648
P.O. Box 190
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
i
Attention : Susan Pierce , Assistant Planner
Gentleman:
j Subject: Conditional Use Permit No. 64-24
Southeast Corner of Balsa Avenue and Edwards Street
Thank you for sending us the plan for the proposed service station/carwashl.
mini-market to be located at the southeast corner of Balsa Avenue and Edwards
Street in Huntington Beach. ,
After revie.r, we have concluded that the project as proposed will probably
have little impact an the Westminster Mall area . Hc)wever,, ,Ae agree with
you that the driveways an Edwards Street should be closed off to,e.innate '' .
a source of potential accwdents and alleviate congestion at the intersectior',
both cf which could be aggravated by the increased intensity of the develop-
Wt.
We feel that the use is too intense given the limited area or the property
and that the carwash should be eliminated from the plan. That would negate
both the need for the variance and for an exit onto Edwards Street.
We appreciate the opportunity of commenting on this proposal
Sincerely yours ,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT .-ffPAR7INENT
FLAHNI'M DIVISION
Michael Bouvier.
Administrative Assistant ,
h
011M or HUNTINGTON MACH
1, sal INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
To From ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES
SECTION
Subjact NEGATIVE DECLARATION Date
84--28 June 12 , 1985
Applicant: Shell Oil Company
P.A. Box 4848
Anaheim, Calif . 92801
Rnt ues t;
Reconstruction/modernization of an existing service station
to a new self-serve station, and addition of a 760 sq . ft .
Location: automotive car wash and an addition of an 900 sq . ft. con- , .
venience market .
Southeast corner of Solsa and Edwards 6502 tiolsa Avenue_ ,
Back roundi
Based on the Staff's initial study of this project a Draft Negative Declaration
gas published in the local newspaper and 'posted in Cite Office of' the City Clerk
Vjr a 10-day public review period ending _ t z ' 198
kind nc cams ants , � the attached co eras mere rece ve .
RecMndation
The Enviromental Resources Section recow*nds that. the -.,Planninq commission
approve Negative Dec. arat`ion`No. `"»
finding tit t e propose project will not have a significant adverse effect on
the envit'onernt.
Mi ti,qation Measures
The attached.mitigating measures will reduce potential envi ror".ntal ef'-,ects i
re ting from tht project and are recowmaded as conditions of ipproval .
Respectfully submitted.
Diana Termn _ B1aisure
Assistant Planner
huntington beach development services department
. f .
STA f
REPORT...
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Development Services
DATE: July lb, 1985
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL CASE PERMIT NO. 81-24/CONDITIONAL EXCEP110N
No. 64-45/ZONE CHANGE NO. 84-14/NEGATIVE DECLARATION
No. 84.25
f
on June 18, 1985 the Planning Commission continued action on
j Conditional Use Permit No . 84-24 , Conditional Exception Na. 84-45,
Zone Change No . 84-14 , and Negative Declaration No. 84-28 due to the .
length of the agenda . On July 11 , 1985, a revised plan was
r submitted for a convenience market combined with gasoline sales .
The carwash has been deleted.
RECOMMENDATION;
Continue Zone Change No. 84-14 , Negative Declaration No. 84-28,
Conditional Use Permit No. 84-24 and Conditional Exception No. 84-45
z to the August 5 , 1985 meeting to allow sufficient time tor
11. evaluation .
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Staff Report dated June 18o 1985 with attachments
IJWP: SP:kla
( 2839d )
AWL
i
3.0 SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN D£SIGNATI
Subject Property:
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial
ZONE: ' C4 , H k gh:way Commercial
LAND USE: Sevvice 'Statio.n
Northeast of 5uh ect Property ( City of Westminster)
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: . Commercial
ZONE: C2, General Business
LAND USE: Westminster Mall
Northwest of Subject Proper:
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: LOB; Density Residential
j ZONE: R1 , Loh Density Residential
LAND LISE: Single family residences
Southwest of Subject - Property:
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General. Commercial
ZONE: C4 , General Commercial
i
LAND USE: Commercial
I
4 .0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS:
Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect At this time,
the Department of Development Services posted draft . Negative
Declaration No. 84-28 for ten days , and no comments, either verbal
or - written were received . The staff , in its initial study of the
project , has recommended that a negative declaration be issued.
Prior tc; any action on the zr tie charge , conditional use permit and
conditi�.'na.l exception , it is r.ecessary for the Planning Commission
to review and act an Negative Declaration No. 84--28.
5 . 0 ISSUES AND ANALYSTS:
In July of 1984 , applications were filed to rebuild an existing .
service station with a food mart and detached car wash and to add.
the zone suffix --SS. The applications were subsequently rejected .in .
that the existing service station location ' was not in compliance
with the ` locational; criteria in effect at ',that,,time requiring - a
location at the intersection of major and/or prirr..a:ry highways.
The, service: station operator initiated. Code . Amendment i;o,, 84--21 ` to
ame
nd locational _ criteria'. hie Code , Arnend»�ent :,to :J�rticl:e; 948.
has teen .�aQProved, by':the Plactive Jul. 3 1995 � ��hep�' ehoment w� lty
.. _ ,
Counci�l. ana will become Offennin camyis3.ion ; and ado tea hy,�,the _Ci1
permit a service atation site . to be located at 'the . , nUrsection . of a
n y 9 y wa�rdg)' and"a � other highway teol =a } provf ded
9
�e►.�ndar ,hi hwa Ed
zoned and eneral. r
that. kwo of the three xeniainln car.nere�:are q E
staff Report - 6118P85., � x� 1 � 1 ?'644d S :,,�1.
huntington beach deval6prnant services department'
SA
EPORY
DtI.'VelopSllk'nGon.'.. rviceo
DATE: June 18, 1985
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 84 24/CONDITION Ai. EXCEPTIOti
NO. 84-45/2"ONE CHANGE NO. 84 -14/NEGAT?VE DECLARATION
NO. 84--28
APPLICANT: Shell Oil Company DATE ACCEPTED:
P.O. Box 4848 June 4,-.1985
Anaheim, CA 92801
MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE:
REQUEST: To construct a convenience Augus ,_
market with gasoline sales
and drive-t:irough car wank , ZONE:: C4 , Highway
to permit a reduction of Commercial
on-site parking, to allow
stacking credit for GENERAL PLAN: General
drive-through lane and off' mmerc�'`w"
r h t �
9 •
to change zone from C4
to C4-SS. EXISTING USE: Service
Stat on
LOCATION: 5outheant corner of
Edwards Street and ACREAGE: 0 . 52 acres
Bolea Avenue
1 . 0 SUGGESTED ACTION:
Approve Zone Change No . 84-14 and Negative Declaration too. 84-28 and
recommend adoption to the City Council based on the findings and
outlined in Section 6. 0. Deny Conditional Use Permit No. 84•-24 and
Conuitional Exception No. 84-45 based on the findings outlined in
Section 6. 0.
2. 0 GENERAL INFC MOTION:
Zone Change No . 84-•14 is a request to change the zone from `C4 to
C4-SS as required by Article 948 recently amended by Code 'Amendment
No. 64-21. Conditional Use Permit No . . 84-24 is a request to
establish a convenience market with gasoline sales and "Or_ wash
. pursuant to ` S. 9430. 8`(b) and S,, 481 . 3 . Conditional Exception No$
'84 "'45 is a request to permit a reduction of on-site parking :'pu►-suant
to S. 9430. 8 . 2 (a ) .
r•eway�
SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - ZOtaE CHANGE NO. 64-14 :
1 . A change of zorte from C4 , Highway Commercial District , to C4
Highway Commercial District - Service Station , is cons istent : &Th
the General Plan designation nti General Commercial and intent and
purpose of Ar t i :?le 948 .
2 . The proposed zone change is compa t i h, s, with surrounding commercial
uses on two of tht three remaining corners ,
SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - CONDITIONAI. USE ')ERHIT NO. 84 -24 :
.1 . The site layout and design of the proposes: uric does not properly
adapt the proposed structures to streets , driveways and other
adjacent structure and use:: in a harmonious manner .
2. The location of the vacuum and air/water hoses limits the use of
on-site parking spaces required for the convenience market .
3 . Dual egress points frocr� Edwards Street have the potential of
creating additional traffic impacts both on and off site.
SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - CONDITIONAL. EXCEPTION NC. 64 -45 :
1 . Because of the size, configuration., shape and lack of unique �
topographic features of the nubject property, there doer; not
appear to be exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or
i conditions applicable to the land, buildings or premises invqIx, �
that does not apply generally to property or class of uses ii,,,, :'.•:
same district .
2. Since the subject property can be fully developed within regular
established setbacks , such a conditional exception Is not
necessary for the preservation and enjoyment o: substantial
f property rights .
3 . Granting of Conditional Exception cto. 64--45, would constitute a
special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon properties in
the vicinity and conforming convenience markets with gasoline
sales .
7 . 0 ALTERNATIVE ACTTCN :
The Planning Commission may choose to take the following , alternative
actions
1 . Continue Conditional Use Permit 84-24 in' order to,-allow . t:he
applicant an opportunity to redesign the proposed: facilities in
accordance with the City 's codes without resorting to 'a
conditional exception and allow staff an opportunity to develop
appropriate conditions .
7. The commission may, consider se! vice use in. conjunction with a
single other use (market or car wash ) . r'
Stnf E Report: 6/.18/85 ..4- (2646d )
i
planned commercial . The applicant's request complies with this new
provision in that the ncctheast currier is within the Westminster
f, Mall and the southwest corner is within Huntington Meach ; both
corners zoned and developed as commercial . A conditional use permit
for r►es,+ service station developments i,a required at this location per
the diode amendment .
Service station standards ( S. 901 . 4 . 1 ) allow service stations with a
i car wash attached to the main. building. Section 9431 . 6 allows a
convenience market with gasoline sales. 5 . 9430 . 7 allows a car wash
Where gasoline wade in a significant-. Bart of the operation 3ub ject
to the approval of the use permit .
-;y
Eight parking spaces are required for the convenience markets
parking required L'or a drive-through car wash is not specifically
addressed ir► the code . The applicant has propored seven on-site
spaces ; C::nditional FXceptior. tlo . 84-45 reeks relief from the eighth
space regtA rement . There is adequate space in the car wash entry to
accommodate two spaces , and would be comparable to S.9791 . 9 . 8 which
li allows stacking credit for commercial establishments with
drive-through windows .
Three of the seven on-site parking spaces are adjacent to vacuum and
air/water hoses which minimizes the utility of these services.
However , the southernmost vacuum outlet could be eliminated and the
air/water re. ocated adjacent to the northernmost space . The
i remaining five parking spaces would he available for customer and
employee use of the market . These five spares do not satisfy
5. 9430. 8. 2 (a ) which requires 8 spacez: for all convenience markets
combined with gasoline sale_.
Public Works Department has informed staff that the exit driveway
from the car wash onto Edwards would not be permitted ,. This would
necessitate rerouting the car wash exit lane and ellm nat.ing one or
two parking spaces . Rerouting the car wash exit lane may cause a
traffic conflict v�ith automobiles entering the site . The proposed
car wash exit Lane may also create a trijfic conflict wihh
automobiles; exiting the car wash and re-entering the site to utilize
the vacuum or air/water facilities . By eliminating the cdr wash
use, the required parking for the convenience market may be served
by a single briveway on td•.►ards Street .
6 . 0 RECOMMENDATION:
.Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve &one Change
No . 84--14 and Negative Declaration No. 64 -28 , and deny Conditional
Use Pe:mit No . 84--24 and Conditional Exception No. 84-45 based on
the following findings.
`'StafV Report - 6/1fl/85 W3 (2646d')
,.. . «J6
A At
• j � _ 11
i •
Rt r 3
r ' T ••f> R! Rt• At At 911 Ai
out s
11 i
br4a,d {t t
/tf M• ��{ •t �Do
:a
t �.2
t _i
�+ no
off
' y, it t.�..•
CF-E of oil
,.f ! - � All S xt � wl � } of
a {{{{ 1 11 I ( 1 1
- � i �.+ f -ct _ �• _ V s �.� C.s of
tt � 1A& I i ( j A� t �
at 111 Wit 11 ,ll i of _��i_ � lw.; 'gt
Eas
3tt r! Nt. _ •.+V t
t tYl afa ,`; Mt s,l : Ft IIi f`x f� f1f • au ,y •r .+ Pf nr •a,�- • f 1? r r'
CO'NnIa-IONAL USE PE:'.:1IT t?. •3-24
t' IZI)ITTONAL EXCEPTION NO. 8 4—?5
'JONE CHANGE- NO 84
NEG��TIVF. DECI..'.pr1'1'i O`t�i �+i�3 . 3 • 2 3 �r
_ ►w-►•r•..Lw
ttti►4tfHGs0H DfAClf rtwnmmG O SION
ATTACHMENTS :
1 . Area map
2 . Site Ulan , floor plans , elevations
3 . Letter from applicant reef-rived April. 19 , 1985
9 . Negative Declaration No . 64--28
50 Letter from City of We%ta;inster.
-jWP: SP : kla
• � 7
I
I
i
e
{
;
1
staff Report 6/18/85 _5_ t2646d 3
o��kr1l�c�ah 4 -
e
Aprt,l 19 , 1985
.IN 0028592402 �pR 9
City tel tlttnt liigl oit Iiviii,h 11chilin$lr� D. R0a fqU
pinnnlng t)ernrtmvto, n 11VJCh" C,q 9�b4
2000 Mnin Street X
Huntington Hooch , CA 9764H
Re: Proposed project for Shel). Oil Company, 6502 Bolsa Avenue and
Edwards Street .
We are submitting a package for a conditional use permit for demolishing
the etxtst ing Shell Oil station at Bol sa Avenue and F;c{wardsz Street .
The site will function by drawing mast of its: traffic from Balsa AvLLntte,
drawing its customers to 4 self-service gatioltne dispensers. The customer
will walk up to in on-s; ltot conventence stnre to pay for his gasoline , and
a1A make niq necessary purchases at the convenience Store.
The on-site car wash i>t an added ,ntir7ction to brim; the customer to (cur
f ,site to purchase his gasoline inr:t.r:t(i cor going a ova the street to another
l reervlre station. The car wa!;h is: givers to the, customer free for purchasinc
his gasoline from otir station. There are no 1t tGndants at. this var w3sih,
as it is an exterior drives thrtt car wash only.
When the customer pays: for htst gasoline, by asking the o.arshier, he will be
given a number which A11 operate the car wash . .hest utttside the entrance
to the car wash Is a machine which wi 1 1 activate the car wash by pushing
two numbers given the cuRtarneT by the cashier. The customer can push the
numbers into the machine, and them drive Into the car ut{sh , and stop when
the wash is finished . The customer drives out and exits the property.
Our plot plan shows stacking space for 4 cars waiting for .n car t-.ash in a
space that is completely out of the way of on-site nuto r. irculation. Past
experience hats shown that tthj number of customers that use the car wash
work9 out to he a small pr_rt.,entage of the total number of customers that
will be buying gasoline at our station. The car wash is being uffared as
en added attraction to our customers in :in effort to increase the: Hale
of gasoline.
'fhis site has ample room for mineuvering of on-sate vehicular traffic
which will coincide wt.th the different functions offered on this site..
We has provided 7 on-site parking stalls to accom.-riodate on-:rite vehicular
traffic which does not purchase gasoline nt our station.
Past experiences with the proposed types of uses t:as shown tbAt the number
of trips generated by such facilities is negligible. Our proposal Would
Instead make use of the traffic already on existing streets .
In olosirg, I feel; our proposal will make a good addition to the coo-mesrcial
businesses, as well as an :aesthetic asset to the city of Huntington Beach.
•• Iy 1
It 4,
j
L k. L.If ff ) L•wrr.,►!4"••AL ��•• '.. .. .'�j�'f.•:_...w.i ',1 r•I•
� � �A..1_r«�•a 11' 1 t
tj
f '
" 1, 1 r• It rill
M• t ) ...• a ems: ry.•+ 4
•� ^ t 1 •, M � It � � ;} ) i'i 1 1 1 �.�► 1 � �
1 } j go
' .; Iw fir,... -•IJ•r►• � _.. ._._ ..., ._ ..._ _ _J Y 1 I:
t '� � 1 , �• •.
, .....art �•
� �• • 1 1.•1 I ..e.♦ w.,1. ..► 1. '.•a', f�,,♦ •.e..r _^., rflaA:., ..f► ••.a 1.1: ►i1
• f•
it
f
There were no other persons to speak for or against the proposal ,and
the public hearing was cloned.
Chairman Livengood stated that based on the testimony and dfscussior
o*.,,
he would be supporting staff recommendation . Commissioner
Schur:acher agreed with Chairman. Livengood indicating that the alley
is there to accommodate traffic when the downtown area is fully
developed .
A 'OTION WAS MADE BY SCHUMAC11PR AND SMOND I.7 LIVEI)GOOD TO DENY
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 85-24 WITH FINDINGS 13Y THE. FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYFS: Rowe, Schuanacher ,, L ivengouds , Erskine, Porter , Mi r jahangi r
NOES: None
ABSENT: Winchell
ABSTAIN: None
MOTION PASSED
FINDINGS FOR SNIrL CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO, 65-24 :
1 . Exceptional circumstances do not apply that deprive the
subject property of privileges enjoye•• by other properties in
t!ie same lone classification .
2 . The granting of the conditional exception is not necessary for
the preservation and enjr)yment of substantial property rights
since the proponed project. can be redesigned to eliminate, the
need for the conditional exception .
3. The granting of the conditiondl exception will he materially
detrimental *o public healt , safety and welfare and injurious
to the conforming land , property , or improvements in the
neighborhood .
A M0:I011 WAS MADE SY SCHUMACHER AND SECOND BY PORTER TO CONTINUE
i SITE PLAN REVIEW N0. 65-10 TO AUGUST 5, 1985 PLANNING COMMIGSION
MEETING BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Rove , Schumacher , Livengood, Erskine , Porter , Airjahangir
i
NOES : None
ABSENT: W i n the l l
ABSTAIN: none
MOTION PASSED
i
l' C-6 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ND. E4-24/CONDI7'LCNA:. EXCEPTION NO
84 -•45/ZONE CHANGE NO. 84-14/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 84--26
A2plicant : Sheli ail Compan;
Zone Change No . 84-14 is a request to change the zone from C4 to
C4-SS as required by Article 948 recently amended by Code Amendment
No . 84-2.1 . Conditional Use Permit No. 84-24 is a request to
establish a convenience market with ganoline sales and car 'wash
pursuant to 5 . 9430. 8 (b ) and S. 9481 . 3 . Conditional Exception No .
84-•45 is a request to permit a reduction of on-site- parking pursuant:
to S. 9430 . 8 ,2 (a ) .
P.C. 7-16-85 -a-• ( 2947d)
Nal Siimnans of staff indieatr!cl the pol ice had iso problems with thc.-
relocat. ion of the business.
r- CON�nIS::ioner Schumacher xeque�stect in the future it an establ isliment
waits t:o .relocate+• str,ff list any arrests that have been made in
said establishment . She requested that a more complete background
check, be given on these types of establishments . f
A MOTION WAS MADE BY ERSKINE AND SECOND BY MIRJA1fh41GIR TO DENY
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 85-29 WITH FINDINGS a " THE FOLLOWING VOTE;
AYES: ��. Rowe , Schumacher , Livengood , Frskin , Porter , 1",irjahangir
LACES: 'Non e
ABSENT: Winch '
ABSTAIN: None
MOTION PASSED
FINDINGS FOR DENTAI.
1 . The proposed project will have a detrimental effect upon the
general health ,\wel fare, sat ty and convenience, of persons
residing or work�ang in the neighborhood .
2 The proposed prcj�\ct will he detrimental or injurious to the
value of the propec`ty and i , provements in the neighborhood.
3 . The proposed project_;will have an adverse impact on surrounding
businesses or land uses . /
C-5 SITE PLAN REVIEW NO. 8V-10/(-0NDTT10t:AL EXCEPTION NO. 85-24
Appl ican t : Thomas JaVb s
The applicant ' s request �*,z for \the development of seven single
family dwellings on seveh lots at the southwest ccrner of 1.0th .
Street and Walnut AvenuA . The C6pditicnal Exception request is to
waive the requirement f a 2. 5 fodt alley dedication on the south
side of the property . The zoning designation is Downtown Specific
Plan , District IP-4o. /The specific plan permitn residential uses in
District Two subjecfN to a Site Plan Review. Site Plan Reviews are
to be approved by the Planning c^onmxss''ion .
l
Jeanine Frank of ��ftaff stated that onliXthe Conditional Exception
was before the Cdrrmission . The applicant requested a continuance of
the Site Plan R7 iew .
THE PUSUC HEA LING WAS OPENED
Thomas Jacob stated that he has requested continuance of the Site
Plan Review. He stated that he was aware of the concerns of the
Planning Co . mission and tie was working on up--grading the proposed
units . He needs the Commission to review the Conditional Exception
before th site plan is reviewed because the Conditional Exception
Is essen ial to the design feature of the project.
P.C . 7-16-85 -7-- ( 2947d )
i
Z
_i
A MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY SCHUMACHER TO CONTINUE
CONDIT,ONAL USE PERMIT NO. 64-24/CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 84-45 TO
AUGUST .51 1985 PLAN14ING COMMISSION METING BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Rowe , Schumacher , Livengood , Erskine. Porter , Mirjahangir
NOCS: None
ASSENT: Winctiell
ABSThI N: none
MOTION PASSED
C--7 #C'ONDITIONAL USE PERI-wr uO. 85-24 �-
R122licant : Dr . Naito and Ted Gregory
The request is to permit overnight hospitalization facilities in an
animal clinic'. located at 714 Adams Suites 101 and 102 . Animal clinics
are allowed by, right in the C2 zoning dintrict . Overnight care
facilities regUire approval of a conditional Use Permit .
y The proposed project is exempt Class 1 Section 1. 5301 (a ) from the
provisions of: the. California Environmental Qua] ity Act.
t
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED
Teu Gregory, applicant: , spoke in :;t ppork of. the project ano handf-2ri uuL ,iti
Acoustical Impart Report. .. Chairnian 1,ivengood asked Mr . Grtiyory if he wa.,.
supportive of the recommiL-ndations in the report . Mr . Gregory answc..rf►
t:he offir nut tive.
Carl McConnell , an adjacent property owner , stated that he was concerned
about the noise from the " animals .
i
Peter Gagner , an adjacent. property owner , was also concerned about the
noise .
s
E
R There were no other persons to speak for, or against the proposal and the
public hearing was closed .
Ccmmissioner Porter was concernhd about an item that was not mentioned in
the staff report with regard to discar:iing surgical by-products which
could create an undesirable situation . He felt the Commission need to
address the area of procedure for disposal of veterinary medical wastes .
Commissioner Schumacher added that Chis was also one of her concerns .
She stared that most of these facilities ;have outside dog runs . Thera
was no such indication in this facility. She stated concern about the
overnight keeping of animals .
Dr ., Naito; the veterinarian for the clinic , responded than the animals
would only be there as .long as they are il`A or recover from surgery, She
stated that the surgleal waste would be trdated just the same . as oL'her
hospitals do. It does not go down the sewer , it is double bagged ar,d,
placed in the commer, cial trash container .
y
P A C. ,7-16--85 «10M ( 294 7d )
. y
On June 18 , 198.E the Planning Commission continued action on
E F' Conditional Use Pet-mi t No. 84 -24 , Conditional t:xception No. 84-45c.
Zone Change No. 84-14 , and Negative Declaration No . 64-28 due to the
length of the agenda .
Staff requested Lhat the Planning Commi:,-siori act only on the lone
Change and Lhe Neg4tiva Declaration and continue the Conditional Use
Permit and the Conditional Exception to the August 5 , 1985 Planning
Commission Meeting.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED
Steve Hogie , representing Shell Oil Company, stated that he would
like the Commission to act on the Zone Change and the Negative
Declaration but stated if. the Commission would prefer to continue
all the items that would be tine . `
There were no other persons to speak for or against the proponal and
the public hearing was closed .
Chai rmar Livengood asked staff if' they recommended the Commission
take action on the 'Lone change and the Negative Declaration .
Florence Webb of staff slated that. this decision was up to the
Commission .
A MOTION WAS MADE BY PORTER AND SECOND BY ERSKINE TO APPROVE
NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 84-28 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE.:
I
AYES: Rowe # Schumacher , Livengood, Erskine , Porter , Mirjahangir
14CES: None
ABSENT: Winchell
ABSTAIN: None
MOTION PASSED
A MOTION WAS MADE BY PORTER AND SECOND BY ERSKINE TO APPROVE ZONE
CHANGE NO. 84 -14 WITH F 114DINGS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Rowe , Schumacher ) Livengood, Erskine, Porter , Mi r jahangi r
NOES: None
ASSENT: Winchell
ABSTAIN: None
MOTIOt3 PASSED
FINDINGS FOR AFPROVAL -- ZONE CHANGE 140. 84-14 :
1 . A change of zone from C4 , Highway Commercial District, to C4�-SSt.
Highway Commercial District - Services Station , is consistent with
the General Plan designation of General Commercial and intent . and
purpose of Article 948 .
2. The proposed zone change .is compatible with surrounding commercial
uses on two of the three remaining corners .
s . 7. 16 85 -9- _ r..t., i... ( 29 4 7
41,
3 Pubii.h - August 8, 1985
NO7710E OF PUBLIC HEARBiG
ZOltE COANGE 84-14
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City
Council. of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Ch=ber or the Civic
Center, Huntington Beach, at the tour of 7 :30 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as
possible on Monday the 19th day of August, 1985, for the purpose of
considering Zone Change 84-14, a request to change the zone from C4, highway ,
Co=ercial , to C4-SS, Highway Cccrnercial-Ser.ice Staticn. Subject site is
located at the southeasc corner of Edwards Street and Bolsa Avenue (6502 Bolsa
Avenue) .
A legal descripticn is on file the Development Services Office.
The City Council will also be considering !Negative Declaration 84 28 which
assesses the environmental effects of Zone Change 84-14.
All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express
their opinions for or against said Zcne Change 8+-14 and Negative Declaration
84-28.
Further information nay be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk,
2CC0 Main Street, Huntington Beech, California g2648 - (714% 336-5221.
D,.ted : JuIF 31, 1935
I
CITY OF HU TIhGTON BEACIi �
dys Alicia M. Wentworth
city Clerk
qW
NOTIrE TO CLERK TO SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING
ITEM '�rt� t.' �'. � .,� .�`__% L _..._.
11 TO: MY` C.LERMS OFFICE DATE
PLEASE SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING USING THE ATTACHE[ LEGAL NOTICE FOR THE
'9& DAY OF _ -�_, e , l9F1
IAP's are attached
AP 's will follow
do AP's
Initiated by:
Planning Cc:mmission ^
Planning Department
Petition r '--
* Appeal
Other
Adoption of Environmental Status (x )
Has City Attorneys Office been YES NO
informed of forthcoming public l�
, hearing?
Refer to l' 'w�.t -� ., t '.• ,��G _, Planning Department - Extension # C5 r(
for additional information.
* if a_ppcal , please transmit exact wording to be required in the legal .
' fI
do
A6
ke�&�,l .e
1
+' ,r.r�,Gl.� ��t.c�:.1g� .. ,t��e,.-tom. ,�:•�.•-� ,.e2.e-�'<✓ ....G.x.` � *
f10
einl 4 c.'.r•s• s;e�i : p h15 ••��+ r',�!`�� ',Ol,, �.KJ..�.R
T ADJACENT PROPERTY
OWNERS LIST"
145-202-052 1.45--202-054 145--202-058
Wilbur D. Templeton Sidney Allen Crossley Tumblebrook Homes, Inc.
17312 Rob Roy Cir. 1055 Rase Ave. P.Q. Box 3000
Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Palm Springs, CA 92262 Newport Beach, CA 92663
143-202-059 145-211-056 145-211-057
Foodmaker, Inc. Robert B. Music Tom D. Hanshaw
P.O. Box 783 P.O. Box 2343 1360.0 Goldenwest St .
j San Diego, rA 92112 Orange, CA 92669 Westminster, CA 92683
I
195-063-072 195-063-073 1.95-063-074
Mark L. Maurel Kuni Hashinawari William It. Smith
14951 Trojan Cir. 14952 Trojan Cir. 14942 Trojan Cir.
Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647
I
' 195-373-010 195-373-018, 019, 020 -
May Stores Shopping Centers Corpor tr! Property Investors 6)
61.60 Laurel Canyon Blvd. 2:30 Par!: Ave. 1 C)
North Hollywood, CA 91606 New York. NY 10169
/2 Ok
Top Number For Each �iyc.-/cis Fctr�as
Address Denotes County C TO •�sct f},•�
Assessor's Parcel `lumber
I
i
• CITY OF kl';..,JPJTIPJGTC3N BEACH .
.J
2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA D2648
C.Fr)CE OF THE CITY CLERK
m
August 22, 1966
William Curtis
18456 Le Marsh #h4
Northridqe, CA 91325
She City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting ,
held August 1.B, 1986, d-nied your appeal to the Planning Ccrwission
' denial of ZC 84-15 and NO 84-33.
This is a final decision. You are hereby notified that pursuant to pro-
visions of Section 1094 .6 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the State or j
Calirornia you have ninety days from ,August 22, 1986 to apply to the
courts for judicial review:.
1
If you have any questions regard.inq this natter, please contact our
office - 536-5227.
Allcia M. Wentworth
City Clerk
AriW:CB:js
Enclosure
cc: City Attorney
Development Services Director
170o0wit:7144X4W)
t I
August 80 1986 ;
►,�' 1
.f Mr. William Curtis .. . _. •,.� t, i� J, ., ...�"
18456 I-emarsh, unit 44
Northridge, CA 91325
Dear Mr. Curtis;
1, DaAsy Piccirelli, of Mesa, Arizona, as the property owner, do
authorize William Curtis to aubmit this Zone Change application. T.
further agree that the: one-acre- drill site will be located at the cornor
of the Flood Control Channel and Magnolia Street in ttun.inGtcn !3eacli.
Sincerely]
Daisy Thorpe Piccirelli ,
P.O. Box 6202
Mesa, Ari:ora 85-106
l •
' i
1
1
,