Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Zone case 84-9 - Ken Moody - East of Bolsa Chica St and sout
121 Zone Changes ZC 64-A9--- Res 5457E/LUE 84-02/FIR 84-3/ZC 84-10 — s/o Nichols St, s/o Warner Ave; w/o MaSnolia St. n/o ;Varner Ave; s/o Pearce St, e/o Bolsa Chlca St — 1984 I i �w v ra.s�+,►ame�tt cl yes " t"ua=ng Pub"r- ' Pl�81lC A� �Cr teJ IJ mot) ) ?1 ! n•.► `.uvnl — �r• .es tr DWO"I 01 •he +.br3� lJ.ri a r LA140W-49ELE I"r A•e. "/ ;a=o. �'i �!t)!e�^t)r' v�• i^ti :.a - w.; June •�?'tf3 NOTICE Is .149 a �t3tYQt tr.at r t�ubbs'tiaert.•q SSA-E of yAUFt�gN1A Wtmrwet-fttuc,ryC!t<sv. - --� 101 of"0,1 CY)+,W., too t,C jnty of Orange ` r,r.. .b,.. •c.+^►^p .a.«w 18qs.Cl, '4'1 tt,► •CDLr.cr: o► `�* �^�+�•' �• �,• Chsmt.4r to .11%0 CIVIC rig �yrc� :uv� +•Q�, �,•!r7 tt /ttXil.l�lt.^rl �1a'�t. I%xw Gt Y."P.m, Cr 06%sow t1~q1v U pav-1 � as on wer.:jvy.1,14 set day ;ot K)"MLa. 19AaI tW.Lie ar- , Ctu.-en of the ►,:n+ted States and a rtsldent of PwvM-of co"skar'.,V a ; txououad arnres+f►ent ro ttN � "le County a!atesaid. ! am vtier the ace of eighteen Lind ttre,.fwnww of.x< R1taww PL►+v-I1Q 644 t A. ,,!arS. dnC not 3 pac!y tc or ►nterested In the Ot?!Ow Cis"s:-0 emWed matter ! am a prinC+pat C(Crk of the Orange �i t9e-4.so,++,w :e. _ '*'r''r..+1irr.lt- C^ae,, �,�=_Y PILOT with which 1S Combined the I Am 1 -CraitiiS:S'�il S.PPESS. a newspaper of genera! Ctrcu!at`�n. "VY. . .E'�' Aron to _ A.-X t: • ,-,n!ed and nutifshed ,n the C,!y of Costa Mersa. ,'�r++>► I* rib lara.tlw' 1`^ fiHANNi eiktd+ff+� ;err{. -Ownly of Orange. State of California, and iha a �\\` *�r It + •:oc:ce of __ Land Use E?e ct e n t:� t�t.ane uf~s trn�: Ara: L I po"9gnsta GAS AV"ltiljlf9d."if C: 11 �r J«ILI"- Qct foot ►&.'4 tit vo wirtw,Avff w rwi S'4W + .rn,cn co17y attached hereto is a truP and Complete enailnduxrs?ro9rsa,hvsta, *as p tinted anC published to trip Costa Mesa. eQ,s �ers>r �vCstrq. at� `:e*pert Seach, Huntrngion EeAch, Fountain V811121y, f't�'Or'Gska+!°"d'pAt°R' nr+alsy tab MN,l+ortt+ 'd �wr r line, the SOUtn Coast Communities and Laguna Ww conx+teitturra t,,yNA t t i M e DrA wcrr+e k zo we "each issues o! said newspaper for _ -- ` No, afMtO attttfl,ra.y a1}'pr►a!i t'»twra prmwny 'e wit the sssUe(s) of r:osntWli tou.:+wdcMcs tarcttytitcr,� D+etAttl In ifl� � Lft /�„ ;'f►teo.�xs�tc�h t�ir+lttt field• � lien hM Q:trscti atld M t-A I ;ttlrstr+Ntc ,Att:wtrt�wtrrp t&-v 1N P►j�maly Cc"" ter t o b e r 26 o _d__ tVts on.at U octcow ta. 1964 publk h#&W tvy ?C,qqNr dsd vW r:`(r tw 'oti.�ea to t,a t modwo M t. 1'JlUrta ca+dnCIftt t++ o« .eWrrW" of 90•►te WOVJ, wffw#ti;" ,M!q! �.N.sp�a•Re,iq+�rit�:s.o 1t � w _ �� � rC!e/ WCated eouth till ._.. -— — t d+u+r+Daniti 1i1t1laRt'at tc �111 �ri ai ti+o r n• x� 4eftbw oteniu) to C.,OrItR O' Mtrtr . wow Cps. \\ ,-'o.cta►e, under penalty of peijury, that tre egoing is true and correct. 0%,w"Pomd tS•:or v 10 - Ndude tutQm cw vaftm on •sle+�fop�+arst M the`1•`tr•10 6 ��wt+am�tr;� October 2 198 4 ripwea.•;�. , •, tecuted on — --- �w am �trtrttla So ansM s1Wr&&.. Costa Mesa, California. � ling, at+d,`express 11f4elf! t i, { or+a4�a 1-111?t t rio __... Signature `` #>ar+,b c of des Cay CIW%.low tan Sb1et, Hurtsvvww��ton t�ti Caf.+xM+ ttt>sii - (114) i T ,Jp DATItr 1r, Ntabvi►34, SMf MY as "Lv"NSIT"I RIACN. 1lttt Aflels M .► ti/entw*V4 Ct=1/Ctrr11 � V N6111w ed (>10 aOMtM nc PUBLICATIUH pr�►tr�. ,k..• �.;r t► REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date November 1 S , 1984 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson , City Administrator ,w � Prepared by: James W. Palin , Director , Development Services ,Nly p Subject: ZONE CHANG ' NO . 84-9 � � f�e„ezAt4wl i e. �� JV Statement of Issue, Recommenlation, Analytis. Funding Source, Allefslative Actin ,_ Attachments:`�T� STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Zone Change No . 84-9 is a request to rezone 3. 0 acres of a property located on the southeast coiner of Pearce Drive and Bolsa Chica Street from R2 (Mediuv Density Residential District ) to C4 OHighway Business District ) . This zone change request has been processed concurrently with Area 3.3 of Land 'Use Clement Amendment 84 -2 . The applicant has requested that the zone change be withdrawn. PLANNING COMMISSIOR ACTION AND RECOMMENDATION : The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the zone change request on October 16 , 1984 . On motion by Livengood and s •ccond by Schumacher Zone Change No. 84-9 was approved to Q-C4 with the following conditions on the "Q" , anti recommended to the City Council for adoption by the following vote : AYES : Higgins , Wiiichell , Livengood , Potter , Erskine , Schumacher , Mirjahangir NOES : None ABSENT : None Abl ' None COrQ i t ions on "Q" • 1 . Any future development will be subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission . 2 . The proposed development shall be designed so that the building orientation is compatible with the adjacent residential areas. 3. The proposed development shall not Ingress or egress on to Fear::-. Street . 4 . The proposed development shall preserve the existing nature trees on site to the greatest extent possible. No 4151 3 . Any future development of this site shall be. designed in conjunction with the adjacent property zoned C4 to the south . FIN51NGS: 1 . The C4 zoning is consistent with the recommended commercial designation in Land Use Element Amendment No. 84-2 . 2 . Rezoning the site to accommodate commercial uses would be compatible with surrounding land uses . At the City Council ' s direction , the Planning Commission reviewed the zone change request again on November 13 , 1984 to consider the applicant ' s request for withdrawal . On motion by Higgins and second by Schumacher Zone Change 84 -9 was recommended for withdrawal according to the applicant ' s request provided that any residential project proposed for the site be designed to take access off of Pearce Drive , by the following vote : AYES : Higgins , Erskine , Schumacher, Mi:jahaniir NOES : Livengood , Porter III ABSENT: None ABSTAIN : Done STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Zone Change 84-9 be approved to Q-C4 with the findings and conditions as recommended by the: Planning Commission at their October lb, 1984 met.ting . If the City Council approves withdrawal of the Zone Change , staff would concur with the Planning Commission ' s recommendation that any residen*:al prciect on the site provide access off of Pearce Drive. ANALYSIS Zone Change No. 84 -9 , was referred back to the Planning Commission for review of the applicant ' s request for withdrawal . Upon discussion, the Planning Commission agreed to recommend approval of the request for withdrawal provided that any residential project on the site be required to provide access only from Pearce Drive. The a plicant presently has approved Tentative Tract 12206 on the site which has access off of Pearce Drive . That approval is under appeal to the City Council and is scheduled to be heard at the November 19 , 1984 meeting. Staff continues to feel that the site is most appropriate for commercial use and has therfore recommended that Area 3. 3 of LUc 84 -2 be approved for a change to General Commercial . Consequently , � staff also recommends that Zone Change 84 -9 to Q-C4 also be approved. If the City Council approves the request for withdrawal of the item , staff would recommend that the Council deny the appeal of the Planning Commission 's approval of TT12206 and retain access off of Pearce Drive . I 1 I FUNDING SOURCE : No funds required . ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The City Council may approve the withdrawal of Zone Change 84 -9 . !� ATTACHMENTS : I 1 . Letter from Ken Moody dated October 24 , 1984 2 . Planning Commission staff report dated November 13 , 19114 3 . 'Request for Council Action dated Novembci• 5 , 1984 4 . Ordinance JWP:HS :ajh ( 1385d ) k • 010 ( Ken J 7 -0 tC%J.. loody 4641 LOS PATOS k�CE(dE� HUNTiNGTON BEACH, CA 92649 CI'r Cf.C�iF. CI") G% (714) 840.1827 4Jh:.N*-.Gh it LCO. r,At,►- Octoter .24 , 1984 City or. Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach , Calif Dear Members of Ci ty Cc,unc i l I would like to request that you not take action on LA!1D USE ELEMENT tl0 . 84-2/ EIR 84-3 Zone Case tic . 84 - 9 , at this time . but to send it back dawn to the nldnning Commission for reconsideration . The reason 1 am requesting this action is as follows : i filed for the zone change at the 53me Lima as my TT 12206 & CE 84-05 because of' the deadline date in doing so with the city . During these last few nonths , since filing , I have had a market analyst ` done by Charles Clark , a planner here at the city , and have bee► working with several brokers regarding developing this ir'. j ccmmercial project: . With the input that has been receivec, from those with experience in the develop-ment of strip shopping centers , I nave been advised that this is not a good location and that the price of the land is tc, high for the type, of retail aid commercial development we would beable to pout: in . Therefore , I have dec: idea to build ten `our-plexs and one tri -plex apartment building as shown or. TT 12206 . T`,ese buildings are appraised at approximately $ 730 , 300 . 00 each which is consistent. with the surrcu:.ding neighborhood . In closing , I wou 'Ad 'like to state that I wi '. l be avalble to discuss with any of you any questions you may have regarding my request to with :raw my application for rezoning . Thank You X; k6ri Moody 9c,r ►• M "v h intington beach development services department STAf f REPORT - I" To : Planning Commission from: Development Services Date: Novemiber 13 , 1984 Subject : LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT hO. 64--2 AREA 3 .3 PEARCE-DOLSA CH1CA AREA. AND ZONE CHANGE NO. 84- 9 I On November 5 , 1984 the City Council reviewed Land Use EZbment No . 84-2 . Prior to the meeting Council reviewed a letter from the anpl;cant for Area 3 .3 . The amendment would redesignate 3 .0 acres � located on the southeast corner of Holsa Chica Street and Pearce Drive from medium density reside►, zial to general commercial . In addition , Zone Change No . 84-9 requesting a change frow R2 to C4 was processed concurrently with the Land Use Amendment . The applicant indicated that tie had doci ded that he would prefer to develope the site under the existing medium density residential designation. Due to the fact that the Planning Commission recommended approval of the amendment and zone change at the meeting of October 16, 1964 ; the City Council referred this requer.t for withdrawal back to the Planning Commission. The City Council directed that the Planning Commission review this request and report back to the Council by their November 19 , 1984 meeting. In addition, the applicants request for residential subdivision io:ntative Tract 12206 on the subject property has been appealed to the City Council by adjacent property owners . The appeal is scheduled to be heard by the City Council on November 19, 1984 . The applicant is redesigning the project to take access off of Bolsa Chica Street rather than Pearce Drive as approved by the Planning Commission. This new design will be presented to the City Council as an alternative to the previous layout . Recommenda t ion Staff recommends that the Planning Corivniss.ion uphold their approval of Land Use Element Amendment No . 84-2 and Zone Case No . 84-•9 and recommend adoption by City Council . Attachments : 1 . Letter from Ken Moody dated October 24 , 1984 2 . Staff Report dated October 16, 1984 JiJP s NS s jr - :3 A 40 235 4641 LOS PATua HUNT;NGTON BEACH. CA 92649 (7i•i 84o se:r October (24 , 1311-14 City of 1lusltin9 t.on Sea c 2000 Main Street }+.int i ng t on lieach , Calif Dear Members of City COUn it I would like to request that yoir not take action: on LAND VNE ELEMENT � tIQ. 84 -21L1R 84 - 3 7.one Cas too . tl4 -r� , at thi , time , but to send it r r e NI nnin mmissinn for reconsideration . i,a�. k town t 1 the d Q L � 1iv reason I am req..casting th ' s action is as fcl lows : i 1 f i led for the zone change at he same time as my T1 12206 � CE h4 -05 beause of the deadline date in toing so with the city . During ttses(� last few montiss , ince f i 1 i >y , I have pact a market anal , is done by Charles Clark , a planner t ?r(? at the city , and t ie been worki na with several brokers regard g developi ;>enreceived i nta a ti ; commercial project . ►kith the input: that ha,, from those with experience in the develop 1 �of strip shopping centers , I I have been antiisec; that this is good 1acation and that Lne price of the land is to high r tht� t es n ,' retail and commercial (1rv� I np(TIPnt we wou l (1 �► refs t.� put i TJ Therefore , �dvedec i (1- to bui Id ten fo -plev. and one tri -plex j apartment building as shown on TT 12206. ese buildings are alslsraised at approximately t.�730 , 000 . 00 each hich is consistent with the surrounding ri? ighborhoocl . In closing , 1 would like to state that I will b avaible to discuss with any of you any questions you may have regar„ rig my request to withdraw my application for rezoning . I Thank You Kerr Moody . .. + -ems- •. r rww ..f tr.Q?J Lift � � 1 low %a I �13 V � - — - — dL- # I V I I i Il w it1 i 1 • oAffv flev Pp- I Itcat 2 .2 - Stafi request !', LhesL policy language he_- adcled to the I.ar,u Use Liement to meet the requi rerient of State lai.: which provi cjes that local general 1, 1.3na Le cai.r i s tent with county airport envi :onv land use plans . Staff rec:nrimends that the following policy language be adus.'id t i the Lind Use Element : "Any project which requires a :lctice of 1✓_01~osec: construction of alteration by the E'Ai:, undat FAR part 77 , shall submit a copy of the FAA application to the Airport Lano Use Commission (AL.L'C) , and provide the City with the FAA and ALUC responses . If they ALUC requests review of the project, then the project shall be submitted to t1l e Commission. Notice of an, ALUC determination of I inconsistency, with the Co-emission' s Airport Environs Land Use Plan (ALLUP) , must be given to the City within 60 calendar days from the date of referral of the application to the AI.I C, and shall r-a considered before the City takes any action on the 1 ,,oject . If the Commission fails to give: suet-, notice of inconsistency within that period, the proposed project shall be deeced consistent with the AELUP. " Area 3 . 1 - The``Ci.ty-initiated request is to redesignate 4 . 65 acres � located west. of Nichols Street and approximately 1 , 000 feet south of Wanner Avenue from Gcneral Industrial .0 ;solid Waste 1acility. Staff recor,merid, approval of the Area 3 . 2 - The aJ)L11 iCant' s request i s to rer.',esi gnate 1.0 .4 acres located west of ,Iagnolia Street .arid approximately 450 feet north of warner Avenue from General Commercial to tiiued Development . Staff recommends 0.at: the applicant ' s request be denied, and that the site retain the General Commercial. designation. . Zone Change No. 84 -10 was submitted by the appl %cant to be processed cc.icurrentl y with this land use amendment request . i' Area 3 .3 - The applicant ' s request is to re designuLe 3 .0 acres i located east of Bolca Chica Street and south of Pearce Street f roe, Medium Density Residential to General Commercial . ti :"_ff recommends that the 1'lenning Commission approve the applicant ' s request to General Commerc i a 1 . 'Lane rhan4c No. 8 I -9 wos submitted by the applicant. to be processed concurrently with this land use amendment request . 3 .0 E:NVI &ONME NTAL STATUS : Land Use E.l.ement: Arenciment. l�o . 84-2 was prepared in con unction with nnv i rontcental Impact Report No. 84-3 . EIR 84 -3 was posted for a 45-day review pe r iad which ended on October 12 , 1904 . Written, comments and responses are cont-mined in the LIFE/E`a 14 report: . ( 1246d) -2.. :staff keport 10-16-J4 1huntington beach deve!opm'-k ;t services department ffTA I 'ICE: rlarining Commission FROM: Development Services DATE: Gs_ sober 16 , 19b4 SEJBJrCr : LAND USE ELEMENT AMMMEt;r NO. 84-•x. . ENV1C-.C1d J.NTAL IMI ACT REIG11 No. 64-3 1 .0 SUGUE:STED ACTION : Staff reco.T rends that the Planning 1 . Approve Environmental Impart R(Ipor t No. 64 --J 2 . Adopt by resolution Lptiid Use Elenerit Ame::6nenr, W . 134-� with � the staff recom:rendattons outlines: in Section 2 . 0 of this report . 2 .0 BACKGROUND INEOMIATIOh : i Transrr.itted for public hearing are Lard Use 1.0 . 84-2 and Environmental. Impact keport No. 04 -3 . Tine azendmunt addresses two a6ministrative itens as requested by the City, and � . t.1ree proposed changer, to the General Plar Land Ui v Liagram as reques te-1 by the O t %.- and ;:r i va tz y.r;oper t y owners . 'the atrendn�Qn t.- consists of the following recominend`d changes: !ter, 2 . 1 -- Staff. requests that a solid -waste facility land usl: designation be created in order to saLisfy recent State legislation regarding the siting of sulld waste faciliLi.es . In siting a solid waste facility the law requires that Ioca 1. agencies make ra finding of consistency with tho general plan . In order for this to occur , the local jurisdiction must identify the fac lity on the land use diagram of the laatid une el ment based on iin6in►3s cf compatibility with su.&rounding t160e. Staff � recornmends that policy language be created estNh-ltshing this new ciesignati.on a'%id that such fac•i l i t ales meot the follcAvinrf locbttOn c.r � teria of b tii�g located within or l:redomi.nantly stirr. o►inded L=,y it,Gu "trial and/or public/quasi--publ.fc: utility areas, and be in close proximity to L si(-,riaated truck rck:tas . 63 ) . .ru.iAS 4 V ATTAt.:iIMI.1'1':; 1 . I_.(,t. F.i�l -:?j' F:') 1� h1 -3 ! :.,r,�� �i��Cl�r;�•r.t ) Re.':n I tit i of I NO 3 . Let t v r `_rc-. Lir�ca:�r�;•-I.;.}; ! lr:v�; ir ra , it: _ . Jh'11 : CC-..l I i I - I i ( 12466) -3 - Staff. fWq'ort 10- 16 -64 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION L1 N �lS � f�Plr�l n� C v��r►•. v+ D �:. �3�•T� Date cK�t.gL'tr �t:, 13:,•= Submitted to: flonc,rabl c Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles ;, . Thompson , City Adninisstra Prepared by: Jcres W . Palin , Director , l;eveloprrent Servic.ef; �, 1C1 Subject: ACNE CHANGL NO, 84-C3 ( It. CONJUNCT101. WITH I,AAU 'SE ELUIENT A.%'.END►SEL',;T F34-2, AREA 3 . 3 ) _ bin 4P. '139 _..�.. Statemont of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, AttachmQnw-"\ STATEMENT 01' ISSUE: Tr ansm.' tte d for yaur consideration Zone Change No . S•1-9, a ' request i} ?'per_ Moody to rezone 3 . 0 acres of propel t y located on the southeast corner of Pearce Drive and Bolsa Chic.:a Street grain f!2 (helium Venssity Residential District ) to C4 (highway c:orarrercfal District ) . i PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION rr.iG RLCC;�w1-1,LN PAT]0 : The Planning Comziss icrl held a Public hearing an the zone change request on Cctober 16 . 1964 . On rnotiar, by Livengood and ;;ccon6 1,} Schuwacher 'Lane Change No . 64-9 was approved to L-C4 with the following conditions on the "C" , and recoomenced to the Cit} Council fr,r adon,ption t:y thi• following vote : AYE : Higgins , hinchell , Livengood, Porter , Erskine, Schur^ache r , Mi jahatig i r NOES : gone ABSENT: N0110- ABSTAIN:: None Conditions on "< 1 . Any future developr,,ent will be subject to apl.roval of a conditional 1 Use Perr i t, by the Planning Comr; iris ion . 2 . The proposed develorrent shall be des :gned so that the building orientation in compatiLl— the adjacent residential areas . 3 . The proposed ceveloprient shall not ingress or egress on to Pearce Street . 4 . The proposed development shall preserve the existing nature trees on site to the greatont. exterit possible . S . Any future development of this site shall be designed in conjunction with the adjacent property zoned C4 to the south. Poo 41'SI M � FINDINGS : 1 . The C4 zoning is consistent with tho recommended commerci�ll designation in Land Use Element Acendr.ent l:o . $4--2 . 2 . Rezoning the site to accommodate comae-c i a 1 uses wou 1 u Le compatible with surrounding Itir, a uses . STAR RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommendation i u ideni- ical to that of the Planning Commission. II ANF&L.YSIS : j The applicant , hen Moody, has re-qucste6 a recesignation of approximately 3 .0 acres of land from R2 iM(--diurl, Density Residential ) to C-1 (ilighwa} Commercial District ) to accon;rodate a proposed commercial shopping plaza . The site would contain 61 , 80O square feet of retail ccmirE47cial uses , and would include 2 . 34 additional acres of existing commercially zoned prolerty directly South c. f the area of concern . The: projoct would then be integrated ►.ith e: fisting office and commercial developments to the south . 'rne comprehensive nature of the pro'iect would allot, the new commercial area Ueti een Warner Avenue and Pearce Street to meet the locati-onal criteria specified in the General Plan . As indicat.eci in the r.,arket vtudl conducted for Land Use Element Arend ent No . 64- 2 , Ar--a 3 . 3 , the site is capable of supporting comr.:ercis.l uses in conjunction with others that could -develop on the Meadorlark Airport site . If the 3 .0 acre site was zoned For commercial use and i ntentled. to be a separate entity , it would Le desirable to limit access to Pearce Street in order to reduce curb cuts along balsa C-Mca Street . I € unavoidable , one access point could be allowed on bolsa Chic:a Street as far south of Per-Arse Street as i:ostsible . To :educe '. mpacts on residential area to the north, cne access point on Golso Chica Street would be desirable provit..- d that the site ir. integrated with the corratercial pope. ties and ac % :�lot.ments to the south . A commercial mining reties ignation of the site would l,e compatible with the commercial areas to the south . bolsa C:hica Street Fit a major arterial would Frovide sufficient aeparat ion to make the site ' compatible with the medium densit} residential Brea to the west . Proper building siting , se'tbacka , and buffering required under the C4 district will minimize impacts on the residential arear, more cl.osel.y located to the north and east . The f:roposed commercial designation can be additionally compat iblc: with the low derisity residential neighborhood across Pearce Street, provided that during consideration of development entitlementb , ringle-story and low intensity user; (such as the pxoposed nursery and existing vegetation) are sited at the north end of the subject property„ As indicxated in Land Use Element Amandrient No . 84-2 , the proposed two-story development of commercial users on the site rail ). be similar to development heights in the general area, and will not obstruct Airport operations at Meadowlark . ( 1302d) RCA On October 24 , 1984 , the applicant submitted a letter :. equesting that hir request be remover from consideration . Iiis rational is that he would prefer to go with development of a n:ediutr. density residential subdivision on the property. He received approval cJ Tentative Tract 12206 f roL: the Planning Commission on September 16 , 1984 . That approval is now undet ap-cal to the City Council . if the i ty Council remove. Area 3 . 3 from the Lanc Use L leren t Ame s,iment and refers it back to the Planning Coma-.4 se ton as p(:r his request, then Zone Cliange No . 84 -9 shoulc also be sent back . Environmental Status : �I The environmental impacts of Zone Change No . 84--9 are addressed in Lnvironnental Impact Report No . 84-3 F;hich also covers Land Use Element, Amendment Uo . 64-2 . The City Council rust approve E1R No . 84-3 before approving this zone change . ALTERNATIVE AMON: The Cit} Councii, may adopt the Planning Cornet= ssion and staff recommendation, or mod'. fy as desirec. ATTACHMENTS : 1 . Staff Report dated Cctober 16 , 1964 2 . Letter from Kota Roodl, dated Cctot,-er 24 , 1964 3 . Ordinance JWP : US : aJh ( 1302d) -3- IRCA Rl MH kf RI 1 .� ------------ - _ � " . ------. — _--1 ! { �' i R I .! RI RI }+� Ht : ra �t{ 1 7FFF — t�� •! i� { ��� R l ,. .M _ 1 --- -.----- f , 1 r RI _I ( RI _=— -- — -_- ,RI oil a rJrws+- - R2 R2 . C4 _ ii` c, sytr.t� va. C2 ..R?' A2 N !AN - fil P! ! R3 ROS ...tl ter. r � ( 1 •"$ - '' � .�.'�~ ..- �- V F - { 1 i 1 R2 R2- R2 R2 ;z RZ , Ot _-_• _l R' _...--__+/tom-- �— __...� r• R2 R2 R? R2: ' R2 , R2 R< R I� Y it P.3 R3 P3 '- R3 �;;; ., '. Fi4� x ! c2 'car h MUNTW. GTON SCACN PLANNING DIVISION F3FMF `77177q�- If, huntington beach developrr""t':nt services department STAFF EPORT TO P 1 arn i nc, co mr,i s--, i on FROM : Lev,-I o p r,-,e n t Service!; LATE : Cc tube r 16 , 1564 SUBJECT: ZONE CHARGE No. 84-9 ( IN COWULCTION WITH LUE 84 -2 , AREA 3 . 31 ) APPLICANT : Fell Mcody DATE* ACCLPTEI; : 4641 Lo:-, 1'at.as July 11 , 1964 Huntington Peach , CA 92649 EEQUEST : To ri- zone ay.proxir.Fktvl } 3 .0 MANL-ATOM' PPOCIZSING DATE acr(--,, of proveit } fror, 1,,2 V'o,t. A111,I Ica"C-1—C Oicdiui.,, 1enr, 1 t } Pen i c'e,I t i,3 I to C4 Ofighway COMM-1-Ci,31 r,i Y,t r 4.c t ) LOCATION: Subject 1.rcFerty h, ZONL : locater. cast of Volra R 2 (Me co i %;it; Vc n s i t y Chica Street. and ,otit,b FVV i ('ell P, .4 ,11 of Pearce Street A C h F-A G E: 3 x GLNENAL P1.At;; I ed*,�iTr —Fel)rt y Ver, i. con t ia EXIcTIVC LISI.: 1 . 0 S U G G L T L I'll AC'l 10 N : Staf f recon;rnenh!i Oil-it the Plannin�j Cr-ppiriission al,prove Zone Change 4—c) for reconsmvi)(-,at icri to the Cit} 1 2 . 0 CLNLRAL INK)PMA1,101i : Initiate(i by t,.er, Moody , 'Zone ChilTICjt! NO. 84 -9 in a request_ to rezorte the property locLter' east of Bolsa Chica Street anc- south of Pearce Street fror: F2 (Medium Censity lit-sident. tal ) to C4 (Ifighway C-ommercial District ) . Thi & zorte change is being considered conrurrently with Lanu Uso Element Amendrent No . 84-2, Area 3 . 3 . 3 .0 ENV!FGNMLtiTAL STATUS : The subject proj-.,4--rt} is addreurised. In draft k-livirallment"al I-milact Report No . 64-3 for 1.OVA-1 -2 which Is heing procccaet's colicurrell0j, Agak i ffm M 1-2 0 le) N 4 With this zone change . PurstV111t to the elivircitimental atiOtis in ^ effect At thi --. tirrf: , the L,ej,artmelit of Cevelol:n.e=rat ,et �: ic►_•s posted draft Environmental IrT Ict Fel.ot t to . F?4 --3 fcr a 45 -6ar c:r_�tr,rent. review period which ended C . tol)er 12 , 19re4 . 4 .0 SUIZ4ZOUNF INC LA!• V USL. ZCh NC, ANC' GE,NILRAL'PLAIi 1.4SIGNA'T ICINS : Suk��,e�c�t _E•ra�,c. r t � GFNERA1, PLAN: LI.S IGNATiON N• udi. um I�ensi t } I,Cc, i der It i ,a 1 ZONE: R2 (h:edium Vell, i t y 1;1-S i ov11tial ) LANE USE: taurser ) , single- farr.il } resi (Eerrcr! , vacant [north of Sull tec t Pro per t GENUAL 1'LA1t I)F.SIGt7A'I' IGII : I_ok Lerlsit}• ia1 ZONE: lil Mov. Curls i ty Re O cvnt ial ) 1,At.r, USE: 5 1 nog 1e-f arli 1 y hor:•e s East of. Subjs,,ct rrcvert GENERAL VLAN LESIGNATIGIN' : Verdi , r, Verinity ltcsi6ermt.ial ZONE: F%2 Wt—, i ton Lrn: i t} 1-x!si den t i 1 ) I_.AND USF. A tn nts , sintjIe- fzirri 1 rr;--,s Soc: t_,l of Sul; . GLNEVAI., PLAN VESIGNATION : Com .'el-c ial ZCN,L K ) C4 (QuaI i fie(i C'vnmvrci,a1 District ) LAND USI. : Oi -en storage , tesidence V.e st of Su1;Jject irropert�: GENERAL PLAN 11,LSIGNATION: N.vdi ur^ I:«�nfii t} F:e,i c;erst. i � 1 z0f;E : P3 (Mediutr- Bigli Uensi ty Res i (Jeri tia I ) LANAI, USE : Conciarriniu;r,e� 5 .0 ISSUES AN'L• ANALYSIS : The applicant , Ken Moony, Yens reyuestee, a redesignation of approxiiratel } 3 . 0 acres of land frorr. R2 (Medium Density Residential ) to CA (Iligimay Commercial District ) to accommodate a proposed commercinl shoppimy plaza . The site hcJu1.d contain 61 , 800 square feet of retail commercial uses , and would include 2 . 34 additional acres of existing ' commercially zoned hrohe r ty direct ). } south or the area of c:orecern . The � Project Mould then be integrated N+ th existinc, office anc commercial de ve lopmen t.s to the south . The corprehens i ve nature of the project. would al ) o%, the new cotrarterci,al area between tiarner Avenue arse Pearce • Street to meet the loca t iona l criteria specified in, the General PIMi. As i ndi ce ted i r, the market s tuel} condticte d for Land Uce Element hmendment Na . 84-2 , Area 3 . 3 , the site is cal-.able of nupporting commercial LISCS in conjunction with ot.herrs that could develop on the Mer,(:,awlark Airport si t.e . ( 1261d) S t.nff i;eF-.ort I0-16•-84 1 r T c r , s ♦ ► � t , I f the 3 .0 acre. . i t(. w��,, :.on(. a for cc�r�a�erc i .31 t:.�e. ;tncl i rl mot. nc:f c, to t)c. it separaI.e er: tit } , i t %,au1C: 1!t' mf.irat: Ie to I ir,1 t a ceSt: tU Pc-arce StCt_vt in orcxr to red tic e curl) (:t) ts aIa,l�g !:clISa Chi(:;, Street. . If unavoi6a1)1e onl_. access }'cant COLII (I Iw ilIlov-t`d on 11,ol sa ('t, it';I �trevt .I:i fi,r nowth of Pearce Strvet a.,i 1`il'1!ii1Av . �Tn re(hice 1r1:1';1t' t !: ( )rl tlit- it_ !: i (,ontial are;1 1 I. t h v nor tII i:'IIII iIt'C't'!' !i }`C) lllt Orl 1OIf*,t (21-4iU0 St.t ('f' t Wot116 tit` (:C!:ilril17l (+ 1`rC,Vi die(i t'llat flit lte 1 :, lrlt1`nriit (' (! LvIth the 'ICial }•!'of4?1t1t':- and, � (rt'VE' 1O1'lir'llr t :' tht` tltIt . n C'C)Rtrtt!rCial :jn) inC3 r U,-!, i gilatir,ll i) _ the !: i t (:' wolll t: ile r_ owl iJt lt)l(` wi th the ccm-m.etcial urC_as to the soiith . 15oISit C11ir'a rt, rt'!' t af; a ma ]Or Arterial wntild provide sufficient Sel:aration to rak.c. the Site compatiLle With the wediurr, censi ty resi (lent. ial ;lrc'a tr., the West . 1)roper Lui Icinc, siting , setbitrks , atic buf feria(; 1eatlired tirt(:t 1c Cif d'strict hi .1 .1 minimize 1R11`.•if is crl the reni der-Ai al areas rode y locatea to the nor th arlu lust . 7lle E.roj-osed cor.nerc:iinI des ignition cazn 1)e addi tional I } c- •iipa t ible wi t.it the low detlri t} resi dent i al neighborhoon across Pearce. :itreetr , 1%rovi6 d that curing: coti ideration of development C!nti t. lc inunt.s , si !lcjlc-s tor 1, and low inter isI t } use1; f;Uch its the 1T')frJscc.i nursery anc (`x: sting vecgetati oil ) area r; t the riorth r-n6 of the :subject prot:erty . As indicated in Land Use Elc:r,ent Amenrment h'o . 84 -2 , the prolc,.--(. t ++o--stc)r. } deve lapiven t. cif cor,me•rc 411 uses oil the site will he Sirrilar to Cleve lot.rient heights in the general ierea , atici w � 1 1 (�c� t oI1 strt: air} r t o}: carat ion i ; 1•xa (jowl ark �t..y ��--�'__ f:E,c.c�r•1�11.r,i)1',�11U1ti S to f f that thi' I'll min I rl(j t: :1Cir!11 fi!, il>>rl (lt'1:I t)V(! !.Uric' ��llilnttt.' t.0 Fi•� - ('! with t1)t, fol. .' owing for tec•orn.(-nt.at ion to the 0 1 ) cc-)U1lc1 I a I ter actloil has hevti 1-ak 'n or-, Lan(: t_'so 1 1 !rent Art:c'ridmerlt 1.0 . F4 -2 . 1 The C4 i.onlnq if; C.'onslstent w1 t}1 the rr!co^?r:en(Je>f; Cort'retrlal C(Sic, I t ion in L.arlc Use rIen,ent Aitenc:rC,'iIt No. it4 -2 . 2 , }';-',riling tit#! site to ar-corr,r.x,aatc: cc.)mwercirll rises ht7U1t: 1.e crjmpa t it le with stirrnundi ng land uses . ATTACHMENTS : 1 . Area Mal 2 . ordinance JW1' : CC: is ,th I ( ! ?i,lttil} -3 - Staff 1:nJ:y7rt lC`-10-1-4 Jam ORDINANCE NO. 1 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTING'Iou BEACH AMENDING THE: HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 9061 TO PROVIDE FOR CHANGE OF ZONING FROM MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DIc- TRICT TO QUALIFIED HIGHWAY commERCItiL DISTRfCT ON REAL PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF PEARCE AND EAST OF VOLSA CHICA STREETS (70141: CASE- NO . 84-9) WHEREAS, pursuant to the State Planning and Zoning Law, the Huntington Beach Planning Commission and Huntington Reach City Council have had separate public hearings relative to Zone Case Nn . 84--9 wherein both bodies have carefully considered all infor- mation r .� y rnation presented at said hear inq� , an.. after due cansidc K at ion of the f. indincis and recommendations of the Planning Commission and all evidence p esented to said City Council , the City Council finds that such zone change is prover , and consistent with the -Tx general plan, NOW r THEREFORE, the City Council of thee City of Huntington Beach does ordain as follows : SECTION 1 . The following described re:Yl property , generally located south of Pearce and east: of Bolsa Chica Streets, is hereby --hanged from R2, "Medium Density Residential District" to (Q)C4, "Qualified Highway Commercial District : " PAIRCEL, 1 : The north 182 feet of Lot 1 in ©lock 5 of 'Tract No. B6 in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange , State of California , as per map re- corded in Book 10 , pages 35 and 36 of Miscellaneous Maps , in the office of the County Recorder of said county . PARCEL 2 : The south 82 feet of the north 264 feet of Lot 1 in Block 5 of 'tract No . 86 , in the City of Huntington Beach , County of Orange, State of California , as per map recorded in Book 10, pages 35 ahb 10/29/84 1138d Rev . 1 i and 36 of Miscellaneous Maps in the office o the County Recorder of said county , PARCEL 3 : The south 132 feet of. the north 396 ff:et of Lot 1 in Block 5 of Tract No. 86 in the City of Huntington Reich , County of Orange , State of California , as per map recorded in Boot; 10 , pages 35 and 36 of Miscellaneous Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said county . subject to the following conditicns : 1 . Any future development will tie subject to approva? by the Planning Commission of a conditional use permit. 2 . The proposed development shall be designed so that the placement of buildings is compatible with the adjacent residential areas . 3 . There shall he no access to the proposed development: from Pearce Street . 4 . All mature trees on site shFill be preserved wherever pos- sible . ,. 5. Any future development of this site shall be designed in conjunction ;with the adjacent property to the south, zoned C4 , "Highway Commercial District . " SECTION 2 . Section 9061 of the tliintington Beach Ordinance Corte , District .Map 24 (Sectional District Map 21 -5- 11 ) , is hereby amended to reflect the change contained in this ordinance and on the map attached hereto . The Director of Development Services is hereby directed to prepare and file an amended map. A copy of said district map, as amended hereby is available for inspection in the office of the City Clerk . SECTION 3 . This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after its passage . PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City CUunc, i 1 of the. City of luntington Beach at. a regular meeting thereof held on the i r 2. day of 1984 . Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO F OPM City Clerk City A for-ley 91" REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED A14D APPROVFD: A,3t- ,t CityAciministra or Dirc�c:tcr f evelopment p" I 1 3 . , PLANNING 7..gNING DM 24 SFCTIONAt t,-AA ' 21 -5-11 11.tj NTI N'G"'1"0 N BF :A I I ALIEN, Pt :^%t 1•41,1 tr! •f/.'f,l ! fit, M :I• i;'. t.l :,. ♦ • •1• •1t �. t �• . •r . . •. • •. • �. f '� n1 III HI _ _._ �_... _._. _ i I•( js. C2 i ( !! F- INI M 1 Ito 1 i .RI i CF E , i If I - i NI II, I NI I 1 ri (:I 1, �,, f:� ; 1 R ( �, pr•� �_I �`) �.I ilk 1 �; � � � f : '•! _ I � R� f Stu MH 1, qI , i? i fr 1 � � ( 1 � - ��� AI ' IF oL i, cz R I • r' 1 _ t Fr +�I' P. I r R) �•fi1 ' .. ., RI •� _ R4 I r w I r .� t -1r x C4 1C4 1r 1 dIoail: C'HAII 31.' *,R). H4--9 ni; RI R �7 1 Rt 1 RI I Ri I:•i.iR! Rir- -- -- - • ,.� '�i �'� is ;.� _.i R2 R? 4 i R2 Pt R'14 . _.. R3 R3 R3 P3 -- r 2 _ r4 1 •1 � i .w • t1� ti 1 �_ iaC■ { r j f ZC84- 9 1 mitt HUNTINGTON dfACH PLANNING DIVISION Xen c r 4641 LOS aATOS A►:;;�(YEO I aK HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 ClC c' ,; csti• a� (714) 440-1827 44N'l0ii'1G% 9LLCH. CA1.+t. October 24 , 1984 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach , Calif Dear Members of City Council J would like to request that you not take action on LANs) USE ELEME��T NO. 84 -2/ EIa 84 - 3 Zone Case No . 84-9 , at this time , but to send it back down to the Planning Co-mmissior, for reconsideration . The reason 1 a .�, requesting this action is as follows : 1 filed fcr the zone c~ange the sa* e tlr�e a5 . ,y ►T 12206 Z Cr because cf the C'ead + ine Cate ; n doinC so the city . During thes,i last few months , silice ` iiing , 1. hav, hadl a i"arke'. analysts oone by Char : es Clark , a planner here at the C : ty. anG have been working '+fit`' several iv) r okErs rec;a-Cin,, de� ia� irg this into a ccn-•- rc ; ai project . '.pith :.h,e imput that has been rece ; Yee, fro,: tllt? Se Wit i @X "crter:c� illent i ' strl � Choppinc centers , r i -,eve ID e+, advl,Sc? i,�lat _his is nct r. :,c•o ocaLi n r, a n G i !lat e. price of the land is : C :'. : c;'t for "��, y;.C_ Ci' ''F?tlI t a .i=: cG orcic3i d?ve : C�"Q'it he h' tC ut ir, . There,ore , have aec i dec' to : u i i (It er, `ou r-;, IeAs and one tr' i -� i c'x apart-me int but1L : ng as shown On TT 12206 . Tnese huiluings are j appraisec at ap-roxirateIy 730 . 600 . G0 each wtrlcn is consistent w i th t►e s ground i ng ne i ghi ornood . 1r cic,sin, , i would like 'o state that ails L*)e avatble to discuss With any c` you any questions you may have regar(ling my request to withdraw ^y eppl i cut ion for rezoning . Thank Ypu ,