HomeMy WebLinkAboutZone Change 83-10 - San Alto Development Company - SW corner Authorized IG pubhyh Advera;enonts of ds including public
ss by of the nol:c Su err Courk Orange Counly,
pro
California, Number A•6214, dated 29 Septembe► 1961. and t
A-24831. dated t 1 June, 1963
STATE OF CALIFORWA
Count o! Orange P�bi. ►c1" Ad..ruu.y co.•.a
y by B.1 4"%do.it It WV -n r COV
..11h W a.0:aa,r,.,.Ksth
I air a Citizen of the United StatE:t and a resident of nr
the County aforesaid, I am over the age of eighteen �f
years, and not a party to or interested in the below
c�P
entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the Orange
Coast DAILY PILOT, with which is combined the
NEWS-PRESS, a newspaper of general circulation,
printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa,
County of Orange. State of California, and that a
Notice u! Nctice of Public Hearing
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
of which copy attached hereto is a true and complete --------
copy, was printed anti aublished in the Oc.sta Mesa,
NOT=Of sic
Newport Beach, Huntington B each, Fountain Valley,
YOUR CAft N0:Wj4
Irvine. the South Coast communities and Laguna ►jo11Ct;ofMFREBY,OwLimItzata
public t>,dlartrq wu114-held by.Om
Seatt issues of said newspaper for one wMYcaun ,at." tarty of HuM-
11N.an -86ach, 41. the.. Council
consecutive weeks to wit the Issue(s) of CMmbwofftavk-antw,Nw1t-i
k1QtOR t?eath, at th*,hQW Ct 7 80
mMla n vas ther«nt.as poq-
onda�thi 2 tat daft of Fehr,;
ts;s4 for tft� a
s1 a t com►derkrp
zone^ a 0,A roquw to
May 10 19B 4 r 1 t� nauotcOw tr♦dd,AV .
enwt and BuiMrd 8tmet from Of.'
111:01 Prcfeatbn19 platMI.,m)'to
110WMed cormenu ity eus tmu oft.
trill 10-132L Subpar,to the lonovrrtrp'
conditions .
1, Building n kaN b4 vowad
Ito or»-story or 16 f"t,twhktwA r is
.
2..1' end.ur of ve-
ttidaa t ar tom t re of the
19Lo _
tM�d It+CeDk+ff 11►�11 bM
prtrrldod In MtWk WMM lo'bufla,
th.t darbfoptnsnt: bcm,,06AMI
ra:ldanllal-uaW A Iarnl4WS alih
�the D�lm d of WWA
owe:oopr j
softes Dopertwom of k"ft
4.A ow pNmft'400 tlim em
I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the °mot� '"
foregoing Is true and correct. r1ti:af F�;o me;
t�tnt�.:i
Executed on _ May n . 1984 to 81*0 AN A nMM Wa«to+
antr;4pirrtorta l+aKier aty�wlat late
at Costa Mesa, California. m
z+al.curti,wro+ttrtrwaAlt+ri,►Mw
t�i,obfakMd »'tM t)1Ae�of ttri
Q�- 0"
Signature CATMOfHuigt ay(m !
WY:Aat is AA,1Kon it rMi
CRY Clwk
Rr'ldM+ad Os�Carat WNY l�'l10!
May 10,1tia4
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
' tv•nik
Superior Court
Q JV
s•rA•f•l:OP"CALIFORNIA
In and fur the County of Orange
/1 r fir•{
CITY OF HIJNTINGTt:,I AEArH9 CITY Cl_��.EP It
Pito F nP l'11mjrA'rl
FtMLTC 4PDTV 84-1 + 83-4
ZONE CASE 83.1,0 nm'tctorrurucR�o
"COt,7str. >k1.UMM AMMKM T
state of California )
County of Orange CAPAMiammT
RITA J. RIGHTER u a W '
�"�"bimi • 'AMr�
That I am and at all times herein mentioned was a citizen of f s6. i+�oUChot+bwa1 CA.M
the United btatrs,over the a,;e of twenty-one years,and that I w,Hc,a�le�owflonkatq
am not a party tu, nnr interested in the above entitled rtr;rtter; r•M"°�o'#MR��M�,p!��10a
l�"40.the lib of Mkv,.�*+t►Ibo'
that I am the principal cler't of the printer or the `VOPM
atdia �,
IiUNTINGTON BEACH IND. REVIEW �1���
tftt+ or.tbb trd3bi, rIK'FYilr'
a newspaper of general circulation,puhlished in the City of
t W Hai'Me{itelatt '' ; r; ,.,1;:..•
1.,Re aW SAI eta re iiftW at
tM ow"A.t a vaiT 0 Dow Aw.
` HUNTINGTON BEACH rui 'M sidna' IS-0 ft"" ow
� � lanntt w.iaeaii� e. Owsal,sow-own
County of Orange and which newspaper nublished for the x.R.d+itwte Lot`41%w�1�!�M A
' di!eminstion of It"] news and h.tellig;nce• t general charnc• It*a to mi*U WambM et#uiet�
ter, and which newspaper at all time berrin mentioned find ; �qu,+�d�..�C*Aw-,Awa,ft-miate'�tdle�
and.ztill has a bona fide eub,criptinn fist of paying sub%crihers, C Nh1ie.IA+>Jls and which newspaper has been established, printed and pub. X�� U.
lished at regular intervals in the said County of Oran.a for a r toi a tktr
period exceeding one year; that the notice, of which the t litNT MSS4•
Yurtannexed is a printed co has been published in the regular fma Off I" 0
p copy, p g rrms tso Ulpa'd fArA so
and entire issue of timid newspaper, anti not in any supplement Main St"K 11WA41M CaUM•,
thereof on the following dntrs to wit: ale.rAM-(7141 tw4w...
VA D 4aril':.'.. ,�•.
t r.Y OF M)1 1RNQf 'IIMAM
Ur.AMA hL WwRO"
April 26 P 1484 c ;a..► .
W.VM of
APPM"
I certify (or declare) finder penalty of perjury that the forego- 40
ing is true and correct. "� )
Dstedat......... .........GARDEN GROVE ..... �� tlrc �
84
K. .
California,this ...26'thday of 0r1.L.19... .....
,�aN�N•1�,', N'Mrll�!,
.................. ........ R;,ta .. . . Rich.ter...... Y �►ar�
WON
Signature A. M'itr,Mt�it,irt
l►! as h)Iwl li
o+evls""Arter�ftr*
0 VAI
4409
omit
Pub. +� ,
11ur►ti aii, ir� �i
Form No.POP LIM82
Huntington Beach planning COMMISS Dn
P.O. Box ISO CALIFORN11: 92640
E
Date May 15 , 1984
Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Submitted by: Charl?s W. Thompson , C:. ty Administrator
Prepared by: James W. Palin , Director of Development Services � �•
Subject: ZONE CHANGE NO. 8� -10 (SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION - REPORT
FROM PLANNING CONIMISFION)
On (ay 7 , 1984 , the City Council voted to overrule the Planning Commis-
sion' s denial of Zone Change No. 83-10 and grant the applicant ' s appeal.
The City Council directed that Zone Change No. 83-10 be referred back to
the Planning Commission for report: c:oacerning the attachment of a "Q" r
Qualified , designation to the Community Bvsiness District (C2) zone and
readvertised for public hearing on May 21 , 1984 . On May 15 the Planning
Commission voted to attach the Qualified designation with the conditions
recommer_3ed by staff .
Planning Commission Action on May 15 , 1984 :
ON MOTION BY LIVEN000D AND SECOND BY MIRJAHANGIR THE PLANNING
COMMISSION VOTED TO SUBMIT A REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL I14 SUPPORT
OF STAFF' S RECOM161ENDED ACTION ON ZONE CHANGE NO. 83-10 , BY TH ,
FOLLOWT_NC; VOTE:
AYES : Winchell , Livengood , Porter, Schumacher, Erskine,
Mirjahangir
NOES : None
ABSENT : Higgins
ABSTA114: None
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
I
The Punning Commission recommends that a Qualified (Q) designation be
attached - to the Community Business District (C2) base zone with the fol-
lowing conditions recommended by staff:
1 . Building height shah. be .limited to one story or 15 feet, which-
ever is less.
2 . Loading and unloading of -,ehirl.es from the rear of the development
shall be prohibited.
3. IntenrIfied landscaping shall be provided in setback areas to
buffer; the development from adjacent residential uses . A landscape
f
P,C , Report - ZC 83-1
May 15 , 1984
Page 2
plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Director of Devel-
opment Services and Director of rublic Works prior to the issuance
of building permits .
4 . A use permit application shall be submitted to and approved by the
Board of. Zoning Adjustments for the entire property prior to the
issuance of building permits .
CWT: JWP:CC::df
Attached : Ordinance
I
� I
I �
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL. ACTION
I
I
Date May 9 , 1984
Selbmittelto: ifonorabie Mayor and City Council
a
�Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson , city Administra oN
Prepared by: fames W . Pal in , Director of Development Services •
Subject: ZONE CHANGE NO. 83-10
Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments:
STATEMENT OF ISSUE :
Transmitted for public hearing is Zone Change No. 83- 10 , a request
to rezone approximately 2 . 21 acres at the southwest corner of
Garfield Avenue and Bushard Street from R5 (Office Professional
District) to Q-C2 (Qualified Community Business District) . On
May 7 , 19849 the City Council considered an appeal by the San Alto
Development Company to the Planning Commission ' s denial of Zone
Change No . 83- 10. The City Council voted to override the Planning
Commission ' s action, and ' Irected staff to readver. tize the change
to C2 with a "Q" (Qualified) designation attached including con-
ditions recomme:ded by staff .
PlanninFwCbmmissibn-Action.:
Acti.cn taken on May 15 , 1984 to follow.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION :
Action taken on May 15 , 1984 to follow.
STAFVRECOMMENDATION :
Approve Zone Change No. 83-10 with the following conditions under
the "Q" (Qualified) designation:
1 . Building height shall be limited to one-story or 15 feet ,
I
whichever is less.
2. Loading and unloading of vehicles from the rear of the
development shall be prohibited .
3 . Intensified landscaping shall be provided in setback areas to
buffer the development from adjacent residential uses . A
landscape plan shall be submitted to and approved! by the
Department. of Development Services anti Department of Public
Works .
4. A use permit application shall he submitted to and approved
by the Aoard of Zoning Adjustments for the ent) re project
prior to the Issuance of building permits . -PAO
I
040 441
ZC 83--10
May 9 , 1984
Page 2
i
ALTERNATIVES :
The City Council may modify the recommended conditions on the
"Q" designation .
ATTACHMENTS :
1 . Ordinance for Zone Change No . 8:1-10 .
2 . Request for Council Actiun ( for May 7 , 198A City Council
meeting) .
3 . Statement of City Council Action on appeal to P . C . denial
of Zone Change No. 83-10 .
4 . Supplemental Information - Report from Planning Commission
dated May 15 , 1984 .
JWP : CC: sr
I
I
I
i
i
I
I
a a
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
oN �� 7 Jr4a d0 ems' P
N $�
April 24 , 1984
Sc.�IduIQ4 109+jr+� Date
� • r - _ wr
Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council ,
Submitted by:
Charles W. Thompson, City Administrato� ���
Prepared by: James W. Palin, Director , Development Services do ;0 o
:�ubje�:t: APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION DENYING ZONE
CHANGE NG . 83-10 (In conjunction with Land Use Element
Amendment 84-1, Area 2. 2)
Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: t
I
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
j Transmitted for public hearing is an appeal filed by the San Alto
Development Company to the Planning Commission decision denying
Zone Change No. 83-10 : a request to rezone approximately 2 . 21
acres at the southwest corner of Garfield Avenue and Bushard
Street from R5 (Office Professional District) to C2 (Community
Business District) .
RECOMMENDATION :
Planning Commission Recommendation :
1. Sustain the Planning Commission' s action on Zone Change No.
83-10 and deny the applicant ' s appeal.
2 . Direct stafc to prepare a zone change to R1 (Low Density
Residential. District) .
Staff Recommendation:
1. If the City Council votes to approve the -:designation of
Area 2 .2 of Land Use Element Amen~ment No. 84--1 from low
density residential to general commercial , overrule the
Planning Commission' ., action vn Zone Change No. 83-10 and
grant the applicantls appeal with the following findings Eor
i
approval :
A,- The C2 zoning is consistent with the recommended
commercial designation in Land Use Element Amendment No.
84-1.
B. The site is buffereJ to the north and east by arterial
streets and to the south by the General Telephone
switching facility. Rezoning the site to accommodate a
neighborhood commercial center would be compatible with
surrounding land uses .
a
i
Pad 4/51 - --- -- - - — - -
2. If the Council wishes to add a "Q" (Qualified) designation
with the conditions outlined in the transmittal to ensure
compatibility with surrounding uses, Zone Change No. 83-10
should be readvertised for consideration on May 21 , 1964 .
ANALYSIS :
^:v MOTION BY HIGGINS AND SECOND BY PORTER ZONE CHANGE NO . 83-10
WAS DENIED BY THE FOLLOWING 'VOTE:
AYES : Higgins , Winchell , Livengood , Porter , Schumacher
NOES: Erskine , Mirjahangir
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN : None
ON MOTION BY HIGGINS AND SECOND BY SCHUMACHER STAFF WAS DIRECTED
TO PREPARE A ZONE CHANGE TO R1 (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO BRING
THE ZONING INTO CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION AS
PREVIOUSIY RECOMMENDED, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES : Higgins, Winchell , Livengood, Porter , Schumacher
NOES : Erskine , Mirjahangir
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN : None
A public hearing on Zone Change No. 83-10 was held before the
Planning Commission on April 3 , 1984 , at which time , the
Commission denied the 4oning request. Area 2 .2 of Land Use
Element Amendment No . 84-1, a request to redesignate the property
from low density residential to general commercial on the General
Plan, was heard in conjunction with Zone Change No. 83-10 and was
likewise denied . The Planning Commission also voted to direct
staff to prepare a zone chang�! to R1 (Low Density Residential
District) to bring the zoning into consistency with the General
Plan.
Prior to voting on the Zone Change , the Planning Commission
expressed concern regarding how a commercial project might be
treated to attain compatibility with adjacent residential uses.
Staff suggests that a "Q" (Qualified) designation could be
attached to the C2 base zone to address the Planning Commission' s
concerns. If the Council wishes to enhance the compatibility of
the proposed commercial project, a "Q" (Qualified) designation
could be added with the following conditions:
1. Buildinq height shall be limited to one- story or 15 feet ,
whichever is less.
2 . Loadina and unloading of vehicles from the rear of the
devel"..; . -int shall be prohibited.
3 . Inten4 itied landscaping shall be provided in setback area -o
buffer .he development from adjacent residential uses. A
.� •.2- 4- 24-84 - RCA
landscape plan shall be submitted to and approved by the
Department of Development Services and Department of Public
Works.
4 . A use permit application shall be submitted to and approved
by the Board of Zoning Adjustments for the entire project
prior to the issuance of building permits .
if the Council wishes to add a %" (Qualified) designation with
the above conditions, it is recommended that Zone Change No. 83-10
be readvertised f.cr the meeting of May 21, 1984.
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS :
Environmental documentation for Zone Change No . 83-10 may be found
in Environmental Impact Report No. 83-4 which is part of Land Use
Element Amendment No. 84-1 . EIR 83-4 was posted for a 45-day
review period which ended on February 13 , 1984 . Public comments
and staff responses constitute the Final EIR and are incorporated
in the appendix of the report .
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
The City Council may deny the appeal to the Planning Commission' s
denial of Zone Change No. 83-10 .
FUNDING SOURCE :
No funds required .
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Ord.' nance for Zone Change No. 83-10
2 . Letter from San Alto Development Company appealing Planning
Commission a::tion
3 . Minutes from Public Hearing before the Planning Commission -
April 3 , 1984
4 . Staff Report to Planning Commission on Zc„e Change No. 83-10
f nr April 3 , 1984 meeting
5. Petition in opposition to the Land Use Element and zoning
requests .
CWT:JWP.-CC :j lm
0585d
-3- 4-24- 84 - RCA
0009 r
ti
SAN ALTO DEVELOPMEN CQCMPANIY
crrYC"I,"�f
il,NTNc7Tr '
April 11 , 1984 jrh.,. .tIF.
14 pit rpq
The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
of Huntington Beach
'I'?pia a-( e e &e e 'r. A: �-
Re: Appeal from Denial of Petition for Ceneral •Plan
Amendment and Petition for Zone Change No . 83-10
19100 Bushard (Southwest Corner of Bushard and Garfield)
Gentlemen and Ladies :
This letter is an appeal from the denial by the Planning
Commission , at their meeting on April 3 , 1984 , of the above-
captionzd Petitions . The Commission recommended against the
P.mendment of the General Plan frcm low density residential to
general commercial (C-2 ) and denied the Petition for a Zone
Change from R-5 (office-professional) to C--2 (general commercial) .
The Commissior, further directed that the Planning Staff l..epare
a report for a change of zone of the subject property from R-5
to R-1 .
The owners of the subject property and the proposed
purchaser and developer of the property respectfully disagree
with the action the Planning Commission has taken on these
Petitions for the following reasons :
1 . Although the gross area of the subject property
is 2 . 21 acres , measured from the center of the adjoining streets ,
the net usable acreage is only slightly more than an acre and a
half (1 . 61 acres) . Such a small parcel is not suitable for R-1
zoning and development. Garfield Avenue, a primary arterial ,
presently carries about 9 , 500 vehicles per day and has a capacity
of 30 , 000 daily vehicle trips ; Bushard Street , a secondary arte-
rial , has an existing traffic volume of about 10 , 600 daily trips ,
with a capacity of 20 ,000 ; thus , presently, more thin 20 , 000
vehicles pass this corner daily; and the potential capacity in
the future is 50, 000 . Such a volume of traffic clearly does not
lend itself to residential development . In addition , the noise
factor alone makes this corner unsuitable for residences . Ingress
and egress to an3 from residential driveways would create danger
not only to the residents but also to passing traffic .
2 . The adjacent residential properties , which were
developed years ago , are protected by an approximate 8--foot block
wall. A similar wall around the subject property to protect against
noise and air pillution and to provide safety for small children
would be impractical and aesthetically unacceptable . Such a wall
would further limit the si:;e of the usable property for residential
purposes.
M
The Hanor,;ble Mayor and Members of the City Council
of Nuntingt.on Beach
April 11 , 1984
Pag• , Z
3 . Adjacent to the property to the south is a General
Telephone switching facility on rightly more than 1 acre . This
use is inconsistent with R--1 development.
4 . To develop the property economically with apart-
ments or other multiple residences , the developer would be forced
to erect two or three-story buildirgs ; such a development , no
doubt , would be •inacceptable to the re.,ideritial neighbors because
they would lose some of their privacy when the sight--line from
upper stories would intrude on them.
5 . Although the propar.ty is presently coned R-5 ,
to develop it with professional offices would be an economic
mistake . A recent study by Williams Kuebelbeck & Associates ,
market analysts , prepared for the City of Huntington Beach , shows
that the City in June last year had over 750 , 000 available square
feet of office-professional space of which 47% was then vacant.
Such a development of the property to be economically feasible
would require at least two-story or higher structures. This
development would also be unacceptable to the nearby residents
for the same reason that multi-story residential would be �
unacceptable .
6 . A general commercial development of this parcel
seems to be it- only logical use . As stated above , tho property
does not lend itself to other development because of a.tv limited
usable size ; because of its location on a very busy, noisy corner;
because the property on the Northeast corner of Garfield and
Bushard (although not in the City of Huntington Beach) is already
developed for commercial use , because a large General Telephone
installation is adjacent immediately to the South . The integri,.y
of the adjacent residential properties is protected by a. .high
block wall . The alternate possible developments of the property
would create visual intrusion on the adjacent residential properties .
To force the applicants to develop the property only as single `
family residences would create almost unsaleable: homes.
This conclusion is substantiated by the Staff Report prepared
by the Planning Department in connection v ith these two Petitions
submitted to the Planning Commission.
The applicants recognize that seldom is the development of
any property acceptable to all interested parties . In this case,
however, the proposed use appears to be the best solution for this
particular parcel. The alternatives as outlined above or the
leaving of the parcel vacant are less desirable.
The Honrirable Kayor and Members of the City CoLncil
of Huntington Beach
I
April 11 , 1984
Page
The affc--ted nearby residents who have a legal right to object
to the p�oposed development should find that the planned develop-
ment of the property will enhance the quality of the neighL•arhood
i
and not be harmful to them.
Respectfully submitted ,
I
r
Jim Williams , agent for
SAN AT.,TO DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, Applicant
I
and for
MELVIN I . HARPER , PAUL and DOROTHY HRCWN TRUST
and ESTATE of HAROLD HARPER, Owners
j
1
I _
I
r ► •t �auLC 11 . B Pl,annil Commission '
j it 31 1984
I ,ICIe 1?
!,AND USE c LE_:MENT AMENDMEM" NO . 64-1 y -- AREA OF CONCERN 2 . 2/E r y 8-4
�• ;t)tp1 icant : San Alto Deyelo� ment Company
A request to r_0deSlgnate 3. 41 acres located at the southwest corner
(_)': G;� rfield Avenue and Bushard StreC:t from Low Density Residential
to Geiteral Commercial and to rezone the same Property from Office
Professi.cnal (R5) to Community Business ((.*2 ) Listrrict .
The Conunission briefly discussed the compatibility of 'the proposed
commercial ;•fit:h SUrro+end.ing residential uses and how such a project:
might be treated tc attain compatibility . Mike Adams responded
that a "Q" designation on the zone change wo,i.ld allow staff to im-
pose conditions rela+_inq to latidsca.,inq , setbacks , etc. to any
peci f is Project when it is proposed . The fiscal impact of the
amenriment was also reviewed , as weal as _the viability of a small
r ,)mmercial development. at this location and the possible dilution of
the market for existing comme.-vial facilities .
The public hearing on Area 2 . 2 of Land Use Ele,•aent Art--n6ment 84-1
'and EIR 83-4 was opened .
, Marilyn Lugara , 19082 mat hew Circle , submitted a petition from
! nr irhbor. inq property owners in opposition to the proposals . I:oting
4 I,xi.stinq noise problems from an adjacent 0eneral. Telephone Company
j c;'te prvttrstoi9 the addition of ;any sm�a1 ?. shopping center to this
y .! ..,cation .
t
:' cchard naa:kj , 100G? I-till.sbor.o Circle , i.ndi.c.ated thaL the neighbors7eal.i7t, that this p,ar. t:i.culr:.r property is underuti.iized ; their con-
t-� r.r. is with the nicort;:ai.nt•_y of t. j:)es C-r uses and impacts which will
result• Frog the cl anrm of designation 3ttd rezoning .
Abraham and ,loan tlalker , 9371 Litchfield Drive , sp(Ae to the safety
and welfare of the children living in the neighborhood . They were
concerned that the center not contain liquor stores or bars but that
types of businessL-1 co in that would be of use and value to the
immediate r -,mmunity . ,
%area Harper stoke in support of the proposal , sayinct that. office
' proic_ssion�-al or low density residential desigr:ations are not feasible
!" c►a such a small pa.-col ,
There were no other persons to speak fox or acla �.nst the proposal
,'.inr_I thr public hearing was closed .
The Commission discussed the building heights allowable under the
propose = C: designation , as well as the setbacks required between
c ortmerci,a1 and residential us is . Chairman Portcr -asked :heat the
report be clarified (on Page 1.3 r. e_l �atioq to conditions which could
be aptala.ed 'Lo a commercial development) to more accurately refle.:t
wnat the Commission is authorized to imposts under the existing
applications . Staff will. correct_ the document .
-12- 4-3-84 - P .C .
l Minutes , If . I3 , P ini.ng Commission
April 3 , 1984
Page- 1.3
In response tc questioning from Commissioner Mirjahangir , the
applicant indicated that he has immediate plans to proceed
with consL,- action of the single-story shopping center if his
requests are approved. lie added that: his plans call for a 20-
foot setback from adjoining residential units .
ON MOTION By IIIGGINS AND SECOND BY ERSKINE ENVIRONMENT'►L TMPAC'r
REPORT NO . 83-4 AS AMENDED BY C01-IMISSIONER PORTER WAS APPROVED AS
ADEQUATE AND RECOMMENDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL F611 CERTIFICATION
BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE :
' ' veil ood I'o`:ter , Erskine ,
� AYES : Higgins , t�inchell , Lr g ,
Schumacher , Mirjahangir
NOES : None
ABSENT : NonL!
ABSTAIN : none
ON MOTION BY HIGGINS AND SECOND UY SCIIttt•1ACIIEl7 TIIE COMMISSION
PECOMME:IDED TI-IA'r AREA OF CONCERN 2 . 2 OI' LAN[ USE ELEMENT AMEND-
MENT 84-1 BE DENIED AND THE SUBJECT AREA REMAIN AS IT TS
li PRESENTLY DESIGNATL•'D ON THE (aI?NEIIAL PLAN ( LO11 DENSI'ri RESIDEN-
TIAL) BY THE FO1L'JLO1d1 JG STRAW VOTE :
l AYES : Biggins , Winchel.l , Porter. , Scliumacher
NOES : Livengood , Erskine , Mirjahangir.
ABSENT: None
Ij ABSTA7 N : None
LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 84- 1 - AREA OF CONCERN 2 . 3
AND NEGA'"IVE DECLARATION NO. 83-53
AP-plicantr : City of I{unt:ngton Beach
A request to redesignate 3 . 61 acres located at the southeast
corner of Gothard Street and Center Drive from Public , Quasi-
Public , Institutional. to General Commercial .
Charles Clark reported that the purpose of tili.s Amendmen, i
4 to bring the General Plan designation on the property into
conformance with its zoning and with the existing use .
3
The public hearing was opened ; no one was present to speak
for or against the proposal , and the public hearing was closed.
ON MOTION BY I,I JENC;OOL) AND SECOND BY HIGG:INS NEGATIVE DECLARA-
TION 1,10. 83-53 WAS APPROVED , I3Y THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES : Higgins , Winchell , Livengood , Porter , Erskine ,
Schumacher , Mirjahangir
NOES ; None
ABSENT : done
ABSTAIN : None
-.13- 4-3-84 - P .C .
j
, <' i notes , II . I• . Plannir Commission
April 3 , 1984
1)acT c 14
ON MOTION BY WINCHELL AND SECOND BY HIGGINS TIiF :-OMMISSTON RECOM-
MENDED THAT LAND USE AMENDMENT NO . 84-1 , AREA O'r CONCERN 2 . 3 , BE
APPROVED AND THE LAND USE DESIGNATION CHANGED TO GENERAL COMAIER-
C I.AL, "Y THE FOLLOWING s,rRAW VOTE :
AYES : Iii.ggins , Winchell , Live:►gr:cad , For.ter , Erskine ,
Schumacher , Mirjahangi.:
NOES : None ;
ABSENT : No;ie
ABSTAIN : None
ON MOTION BY HIGGINS AND SECOND BY ERSKINE RESOLUTION NO . 1317 ,
ADOPTING LAND USE ELEMENT 140 . 84-1 WITH THE DELETION OF AREAS OF
CONCERN 2 . 1 AND 2 . 2 , WAS APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE :
AYES : Higgins , Winchell, Livangood , Porter , Erskine ,
Schumacher , r•lirjahangir
NOES : None
ABSENT: None
ARST1!IN : None
ZONE CHANGE; NO . 83-•10
Applicant : San Alto Development Co .
A request to rezone approximately 2 . 21 acres from R5 (office Pro-
fessional) to C2 (Community Business ) District located on the
southwest corner of Garfield Avenue and Bushy;rd Street (in conjunc-
tion with LUE 84 -1 , Area 2 . 2 )
The Commission considered this zone change request in light of
its prior action on Area of Concern 2 . 2 of LUE 84-1 .
The public hearing was opened . By reference , the testimony given
by the public relative to Area of Concern i . 2 was adopted . The
public hearing was closed . 4.
ON MOTION BY HIGGINS AND SECOND BY PORTED. ZONE CHANGE . NO .
83-10 WAS DENIED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE :
AYES: Higgins , Winchell , Livengood , Porter, Schumacher
NOES: Erskine , Mirjahangir
ABSENT : None
ABSTAIN : None
ON MOTION BY HIGGINS AND SECOND BY SChUMACHER STAFF WAS DIRECTED
TO PREPARE A ZONE CHANGE TO RI (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO BRING
THE 'ZONING YNTO CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION AS
PREVIOUSLY RECOMMENDED, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES : Higgins , Winche 1.1 , Liyenclood , Porter , Schumacher
NOES : Erskine , Mirjtihan-?ir
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
-14- 4-3-84 - P . C .
*huntington beach developmw services department
SYAFf
EPOit r�wr.rarrrr�� ��
TO: Planning Commission
FROM : Development Services
DATE: April 3 , 1984
4
ZONE CHANCE NO. 83-10 ( in conjunction with LUE 84-1 , hrea 2 .2 )
APPLICANT: San Alto Development Co . DATE ACCEPTED :
873-C West 15th Street
Newport Q-.ach , CA 92663 August 17 , 1983
I
REQUEST : To rezone approximately MANDATORY PROCESSING GATE :
2. 21 acres of property
from R5 (Office Profes- N/A
sional ) to C2 (Community
Business District ) ZONE : R5 (Office Profes-
sional )
LOCATION : Subject property is located
at the southwest corner GENEWU ULAN:
of Garfield Avenue and
Dushard Street . Iow Density Residential
ACREAGE: 2 . 21+ EXISTING USE:
Vacant
1 .0 SUGGESTED ACTION :
Staff recommends that the :Tanning Commission approve Zone Change No.
83-10 for recommendation to the City Council .
4 . 0 GENERAL INFORMATION :
lnitiated by to San Alto Development Company, Zone Change No. 83-10 is
a request to rezone the property located at thF: southwest corner of
Garfield Avenue and 8ushard Street from R5 (Office Professional ) to C2
(Community Business District ) . This zone change is being considered
concurrently with Land Use Element Amendment No . 84-1 , Area 2 . 2 .
3 .0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS :
The subject property is addressed in draft Environmental Impact Report
No . 83-4 for LUE 84-1 which is being processed concurrently with this
zone change . Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect. at
_- ;7
A-!M4JQ
i
this time, the Department-. of Development Services posted draft
Environmental Impact Report No. 83-•4 for a 45-day comment and review
period which ended February 13 , 1984 .
4.0 SURROUNDING LAND USE , ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS :
Subject Property:
GENERAL PLA2I DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential
ZONE: R5 (Office Professional )
LAND USE : Vacant ;
South of Subject Property:
' I
i
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential
ZONE.: R5 (office Professional )
LAND USE : General Telephone switching facility
West of Subject Property:
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residentii )
ZONE: R1 (Low Density Residential)
LAND USE : Single family homes
North of Subject Property:
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION : Low Density Residential (City of Fountain
Valley)
ZONE: RI-PD (Low Density - Planned Development)
LAND USE: Single family homes
East of Subject Property :
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION : Low Density Residential
ZONE : R1 (Low Density Residential )
LAND USE: Single family homes
5 . 0 ISSUES AND ANALYSTS :
The applicant , San Alto Development Company, has requested a
redesignation of approximately 2. 21 acres of land from R5 (Office
• Professional) to C2 (Community Lousiness District. ) to accommodate a
proposed neighborhood commercial center. A similar development exists
on the northeast corner of Bushard Street and Garfield Avenue
(diagonally across the street from the area of concerti) within the City
of Fountain Valley .
The site ' s corner location offers visibility and easy access, and could
provide the surrounding neighborhood with convenient shopping and
services . The site substantially conforms to the General Plan land use
criteria for commercial uses Which recommends commercial uses which
recommends commercial convenience centers be located at the
intersection of a local or secondary arterial. street . . (In the case of
..2... 4-3-04 - P. C.
the study area , the site is located at the corner of: a primary and
secondary arterial . )
Although located in are area of predominantly low intensive residential
uses , the site is buffered to the north and east by arterial streets
and to the south by the General Telephone switching facility. Six
single family homes back c-ito the western boundary of the study area.
The applicant has indicated that conceptual plans for the neighborhood
center are of a single story design which would serve to minimize any
adverse visual impacts with the adjacent single family homes .
Staff recommends that any commercial development approved for the site
be conditioned to prohibit loading and ,.unloading from the rear of the
development to minimize noise impacts on the adjaf:ent neighborhood ,
particularly the six single family homes that back onto the western
portion of the site. With appropriate setbacks , sensitive landscape
screening, buffering and design, staff believes a single story
neighborhood commercial development could be designed to be compatible
with the surrounding low intensity uses.
i
6 .0 RECOMMENDATION :
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve 'Lone Change No .
83-10 with the following findings, for recommendation to the City
Council after action has been taken on LUE No . 84-1.
i
FINDINGS :
j ; . The C2 zoning is consistent with the recommenced commercial
designation in Land Use Element Amendment No. 84-1 .
2. The site is buffered to the north and east by arterial streets
and to the south by the General Telephone switching facility.
Rezoning the site to accommodate a neighborhood commercial center
would be compatible with surrounding land uses.
ATTACH M?.NTS
1 . Area Map
2 . Ordinance
i
BA: jlm
0436d
-3- 473-84 - P .C.
Rl
77
R Ri
I — 1pl i R1 I R RI .R . RI
t C2 f. i t , . - rr j RI
MH
— — : R i --_
Rf RI - -- - - —-_ R,
j Rl RA 1 R
a1
- MH
a ' :� —R, .� I., !_' ' :ram. — i r•: C s--E
7 •,' •.. - _-_ .. (,t 1 - - ,__ - _, RI �I FIt R1 -
`..� � �J Rt�
- -_Ml - _- - - - - _- --
Rl
I — - - at pt Rl E�
%S rat •1 t ft1 -r:
Rl
� -o�---
I
Ntl�TIvGJ(?N RLALM
HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION
or
rtu-(a, 20, of
James 11 . I',alin , Director 6 � •S'«/�i9MAA' s
Devolonment sc!rvices
City of I1unt,i ricl t.on Beach
Cal i.fornia c):'648
Dear Mr . Palill :
We do object: to the re-zon i ntl of the 3 . ,11. acres located at the
soithwos:t cmr. ncr of llml hard Stroc?t. and Garfield Avenue from
I,ow l>.rns i ty Residential to Gfr,,neral C,'ommorcia l . rhis is a reply
to proty st your rc.�(juost l ettrr dated March 20 , 1JR4 .
i
As homeocmers we our h-,mes knowing that the vacant
1�m(7 in q•r scion •,,ras Zonud for Low Density R,-�,irlert-ial Use R-5 .
Our decision t.o pu I'cha—,c' -was 1_`E1sed lmon this; }:n),:,ledae . We f(-.'01.
that it will hu of t1r) val(-, to our rnhi.q�+orlvcod to naVt., ca ..C,:i-
r,le'✓rcia l u st.ahli s-;hr)cnt un the cor.nor sand 1 'i ri fact be cletre-
mental to our family neignooncoocl . We 1mve adequate shopping
on bQ h mi. le inters(:let: ions at: Ma(_-nol is arld Br.-ookhurstial,f
`� �'�• � - fit./ ��' `,,,C '� ��-` i��
elf
1(10
f t ,.l.�, .� •Jf, /��•� .�• ; arc '� .� /1•}( � -�f�.o �� c:'r Y • ';. ,.
%-- ( �/, � r •�. 1. � ,_�: � � . � f•. ��• �-�. � � �,�
?A
CJ
r /r
1 . ^ J
� -�.� t � r ,," Ifni r'_Li � •.�.•i�
�11 tl� 1 1.1 1111 1 t ;1111111I, ..I Iln t.'11 �� 1 �••• I,It .111`ll .11 1111' `.t It I t,sI t 111511'I t1l
`,,t1.1'I mid ' t111t`ici 114t'n1u• Ittlnt Lim. 111`n>,tl) 1'i'tiltlt',Ilt.tl lu LiI`IIt`1.11
t t,111t11t t t I'd. 11Ils .1 rt`ply it) prult`•.t 100111, rt'r m-st I .`1 tl.ltt•ci hiart-h 20, 1984.
All 1011111.1AX-11VI'S WC IItIr1 h.1tit`tt om htl ic,s I,Iltru ing Ilt.tl tilt• ►.tt .ml Ittn11 It) (ltlt`.0161111
►%os 2;.1111'tl It1r 1_Lttt DoINIty Rosiclt'1ttt,11 I Isv W.S. Otlr IIt'r•Iti1t111 it) I;11r( I►ww ►►'.I'i h.I`.I'tl
111)1111 1111, l.t1t1►t Il'1l};1`. 1t't' It`t'I 111.1; 11 ►► III hi, Ul 11t1 ►'.11111• 141 hill tl1•Il;hhtlt hwl(I 11,
1 1 01111•41.11 I.II t".1.1h11•illllt'lll on Ills' t 1)1111.1 .111(l will I11 1.11 1 64. 11t'tf Illll't11.11 It) 11!I)
1.111III1 111.1};hhurl1ood. Wv h.I►'1' . dv(111.11t• tihoplltltl, on I)11111 11111t` 1111t'1'st`c1low, .I I
111,I},11111t.1 ,Inci I'.rtu,l:htlr�l.
110A.1I OWNER ITTITION A(;A1NS 1' 01 TI II: 1.41 MAW) LOC ATEI)
XF _1•1 II: SOUTIPAIES'I' CORNER OF IMSHARD tiT12EH* AND C ARFIL•LD A\'I:N! ll:
l .00,-low do-wity residental it) general 1 i.mmicit t:11.
NAMI /1t�1�tZl:titi
/r f,1�llL I_ t1f����LIt1.�N_.- ! �L ��' �� (I_:1;�_.._"_'L:-...._� [L •� ��_ ��,ft. h �. ../t r�.�•��'.It��t
ior
-G�
9xCef
M N
oe
ACA /to
owiO06
'oo �
Li M) (I tt-� a 1'. rl a
A
•
OPTOMETRIST
10741 West Piro Boulevard
West Los Angelet,California 4C084
Telephone:470.7576
, L
L
r 4�,
/r I .��/"� �..� t yam.. �� .�r I ���.i� .. `-� �/'�� ✓`I
ol
/
r
Publish 4I26/84
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT 84-1
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 83-4/NEGATIVE DECLARATION 83-53
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council
of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center , �
Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7 :30 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as
possible on Monday the 7th day of May _ , 19 84 .
for the purpose of considering a proposed amendment to she Land Use Element of
the General Plan (LUE #84-1 ) Environmental Impact Report #83-4 and Negative
Declaration 483-53 which includes the following items:
411 1 . Redesignate 3. 11 acres located at the southwest corner of Garfield
Avenue and Bushard Street from Low Density Residential to General
Commercial .
2. Redesignate 3.61 acres located at the southeast corner of Gothard
Street and Center Avenue from Public, Quasi-public, Institutional
to General Commercial .
i
i
All -interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their
opinions for or against said Land Use Element 84-1 , EIR 83-4 and ND 83-53
Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main
Street, Huntington Beach. California . 92648 - (714) 536-5227
DATED 4/20/84 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
By: Alicia M. Wentworth
City Clerk
.. _ . /" tl � c-c•�- ,�-�. ,r,--z�, �_-f� �.��_Q._�-c `�`-�f-�gip''� ��--f
o _ w
�
&I
to
y
1
NCTICF TO CLEM 'ro SCI{I:P.uix PUBLIC HEARING
� 1
ITEM
� aij'��1�/�(S •�'i�` , '
To. CITY CLEM" S OFFICE DATE :
FROM:
`
PLEASE SCHEDIII.I: A PUBLIC HKARI1iG USING THE: A'I"I'ACHED LEGAL NUr ICE FOR THE
V/ AP' s •art, attached ', - ' / ✓' = `"r
AP' s .ill follow
No AP' s
Initiated by:
Planning Commi,;sion �.
Planning, Depat tment
net i tit7rt
i
* Appeal !y'_�
Other
Adoption of Erivirormental Status (Y)
,ria��,����1;t �.�i�•�%=�.. ;mil� >�-��''�{ YES 140
Refer to ��... "a� `•" -l^''lf Planning Department - Extension
for additional inf.orn,ation.
* if appeal , pleaast: transmit �:;aet wording to be required in the legal , j
i
_ -362-33 153- 362-34 153-362-36
MET,VIN ' I . HARPER W.-DDIE R. HAYES i MELVIN I . HARPED
19r-1 HATI}EW CIRCLE 1901. 1. MATHEW CIRCLE i 10211 KAIMU DR .
NUNTINGTON I3EACII , CALIF. HUNTJNGTON BEACIi , CALIF . ; HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALI;
92646 92646 ! 9264F
153-362-39 153-362--41 " 153-362-42
MELVIN I . IIARPER MELVIN I . HARPER MELVIN I . HARPER
19062 ,MATHE;q CIRCLE 19092 MATHEW CIRCLE 19102 14ATHEW CIRCLE
HUNTINGTON EEACH, CALIF. HUNTINGTON BEACH , CALIF . HUNTINGTON BEACH , CALI!
92646 92646 9264(
-5�= ►+'�— 1.57-252-19 157-252-20
I RONALD K. LARUFFA BRI'AN C. BUSCOMBE
• 9425 WARBLER AVE. 25002 TnhILVIEW TERRAC)
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIF. EL TORO, CALIF.
92708 92630
157-252-21 157---257.-22 157-252-23
THOMAS R. KARPINSKI ROBERT ZAFIRATOS CHARLES D. BARRON
9449 tIARBLER AVE. 9459 WARBLER AVE. 18955 CAPENSE ST.
FOLIN'TATN VALLEY , CALIF. FOUNTAIN VALLEY , CALIF. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIF .
92709 97.70E 9270E
157--252-24 157-2. 52.-25 157-252-34
NAVIN D. ZYAS CAROL E. WALBERT THOMAS PETERS
18945 CAPfEN5E S'r . 18933 CAP17INSE ST. 9444 SHRIKE AVE.
FOUNTAIN VALLEY , CALIF. F•'OUN'rA.IN VALLEY , CALIF. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIF .
92708 92708 92708
157- 252-35 157 - 252-36 1.57-253-06
HARi,F:Y E . DAHNKE PETER MARLISCHAK JOANN JOHNSON
9434 SHRIKE AVE . 9422 :SHRIKE AVC . 7882 BEACHPOINT DR. 02
FOUNTAIN VALLEY , CALIF. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIF . HUNTINGTON BEACH, CAL1
92708 92708 9264t.
157-253- 07 157 - 253-08 + 157-233—.09
AI?THUR J . CABRERA 1.ARRY 130STOCK FRANK G. BEELS
9432 IIARBLER AVE. 9?4 -14 WARBLER AVE . 9456 WARBLER AVE.
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIF. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIF . FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIF'.
92708 92.708 9270F
157- 253- 10 157-253-11 157-253-12
LFE D. BE.RGF.IRSON INILI..IAM R . KEYNC,L,DS JOSEPH J . BANGAN
94G6 1-7f\RRI,ER AVE. 9476 4ARBLER AVE. 9486 WARBLER AVE .
I�ni}N'I'AIN VALLEY, CALIF. F'OUNITATH VAi�LEY, CALIF. FOUNTAIN VALLEY , CALIF .
92708 92708 927C4
157-253- 13 1. 57-253-14 157-253-15
ROPIALD0 G. STORF EVELYN IIYATT JOHN P. DALPOGGETTO
I WA16 CAPENSE ST. 18956 CAPENSE ST. 18946 CAPENSE ST.
Ft.)tJNTATN VALLEY, CALIF . FOUNTAIN VALL;]Y, CALIF. FOUNTAIN VALLEY , CALIF .
92708 92708 92708
1 57- 2-53-IG 1 57- 253-17 157-264-01
F l',*,NK A . C.'I,ARF, JOHN K . VASINA MOSBACHERAG CO.
18934 �:AI'L:NSE' ST. 19924 CAPENSE ST . 2828 N . HASKELL, AVE.
POUNTA'I11 VATA-};Y , Ct%I,JF. F'OUNTATN VALLEY , CALIF. DALLAS ; TEXAS
92708 92708 75204
157- 28';-02 157-284 -05
t.AIiK OF All-St;s, ICf1 l.t:'I' .Y c:O1,S'r0N i KAY 'r0Y0DA
4500 C'itltf't':; DR . 0202
') !il4 S'.10FETRES AVE . 9528 SMOKETREE AVE.
_ts 'W[tf) I,1s _1 `, - _- 1•r'tl I)A'llA ► 9t 1!L1 T VV /,Ai 1 V -1.•....A ram. 1...e ► .-.. .+.. . . 11
_ za�w.,r:aw.;v�r►rr} P.. .-ram.r.�; +7-,1•.T'V mm -FT.
'l 57-284-06 157-284- 07 I 157-284� 09 •�z �;
RODERICK ,0 . CHALMERS � BORIS KAMENTSER � DEPT OF VET AFFAIRS
. g:4j40'•.SMQKt;TREE AVE. 9551" SMOKETRCE AVE. 9578 SMOKETREE AVE .
FOUNTAIN VALL1 Y, CALIF . FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIF. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, Cg27
92708 `
157-284-44 157-284-43 157-284-30
ETTA LAMB MARTIN L. MELTZNER VICTOR PIETRANTONI
18752 GREGORY LANE 2976 QUEENSAURY DR. 9583 SHIMIZU RIVER C:
HUNTINGTOiJ BEACH, CALIF . LOS ANGELES , CALIF . FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CAI.
92646 90064 927
157-284 - 17 — 157-284-31
MERVIN N . JACKA EDWIN R. MCINTYRE
• '�� 9588 SHIMIZU RIVER CIR 9582 SHIMIZU RIVER C
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIF. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CAI,
92708 927
153-371-06 153-371- 69 153-351.- 16
WrLf,IAM LAMB CARL GRETF7,U RICHARD SPARNO
9542 GARFIELD AVE . 9551 BASS 9452 LITCHFIELD DR .
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIF . HUN'I'INGTON BEACH , CALIF . HUNTINGTON BEACH , Ct•.
92646 92646 92,
153-373-04 153-371-68 157-284-00
MARJORIE T. VIERS CHARLES M . FROF!,IC FRANCOIS VALENTI
191.21 WALLEYE LANE 19072 WALLEYE 9895, SITKA
HUNTINGTON BEACH , CALIF . HUNTINGTON
BEACH , CALIF. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CAI,
92646 92646 927
153-362-35 153- 362-24 153-362-21
KENT KEN7.LI AI,VLN C. LUNDEN NOE CRUZ
19012 MATHEWS CIRCLE 19082 HILLSBORO CIRCLE 19042 HILLSBORO CIRU
HUNTINGTON BEACH , CALIF . HUNTINGTON BEACH , CALIF. ! HUNTINGTON BEACH , CA
92646 92646 92-
153-362-37 '� 153-1051-19 153-362-22
MELVIN I . HARPER JACK WEAR RICHARD N. PARKS
19C32 MATHEW CIRCLE 9451 VErjARDO 19872 INVERNESS
HUNTINGTON BEACH , CALIF. HUNTINGTON BEACH , CALIF. HUNTINGTON BEACH , CA-
92646 9264E 92,
153-373-01 153-351- 18 153-362•-40
ELWOOD DONNER CFInRLES F. HOFFARD GEORGE P. LUGARO
9341 PORTSMOUTH DR. 9,161 VELARDO 19072 MATHEW CIRCLE
HUNTINGTON BEACIi , CALIF . HUNTINGTON REACH , CALIF. HUNTINGTON BEACH , Ct�
92646 92646 92
153-•-362-38 153-373- 11 U0 . I/ sQ
WM. F. BOUCHARD JAMES E. SMITH
19042 MATHEW CIRCLE 191n2 BUSIfARD 79ck) C'}1,A ,�..���
HUNT?NGTON BEACH , CALIF. HUNTINGTON BEACH , CALIF.. � � 07 4
92646 92646 /
.. 153-371-09 3.ti �l
153-::,1-1�7 � v �*18752
53-.371-03 �
MELVIX- I% HARPER ARL A. LAMB WILLIAM G . LAMB
1841 ' SARAR ' DR. GREGORY LANE 9542 GARFIELD AVE.
COSTA MESA, CALIF . HUNTINGTON BEACHoCALIF. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIF
92626 ,�. 92646 I 92646
153-371-�05 153-371-70 i 153--311-71
WILLIAM G LAMB EARL A. LAMB `` ROBERT ANETSBERGER
9542 GARFIELD AVL. 9541 BASS DR . 14509 GREENMEADOWS AVE.
HUNTINGTON BEA. .11 j CALIF. HUNTINGTON BEACH , CALIF. i `T'ORRANCr,. r CALIF.
92646 92646 I 90505
V
153--371-72. 153-371-73 1353-373--02 \
EARL A. LAMB EARL A. LAMB I EARL A LAMB
18752 GREGORY LANE P . O . BOX 1284 119101 WALLEYE LANE
HUNTINGTON BEACIF, CALIF. MAMMOTH LAKES , CALIF. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALL'
92646 93546 ; 92640
153- 373-03 153-373-09 153-373-10
EARL A. LAMB EARL A. LAMB EARL A. LAMB
19072 CARP CIRCLE 19122 BUSHARD ST 19112 BUSHARD ST
HUNTINGTON BEACIF , CALIF. HUNTINGTON BEACH , CALIF. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CAI,II`
92646 92646 9264 (�
I .
153-373-12 153-351-12 , 153-351--13
CARL 11 . REINHART RICHARD A. LAITRES EDWARQ EADER
P .O. BOX 4476 9402 LITCHFIELD DR. 3809 SEASHORE DR.
IRVIIJE, CALIF. HUNTINGTON BEACA , CALIF. NEWPORT BEACH , CALIF.
92716 92646 92663
U
153-351-14 153-351-15 t 153--351-20
SHARON K . LOVE FREDERICK A. RYAN MELVIN I . HARPER
9422 LITCHFIELD DR . 9432 LITCHFIELD DR . ► 9431 VELARDO DR.
HIINTINGTON BEACH, CALIF. HUNTINGTON BEACH , CALIF. HUNTINGTON BEACH , CALIF
92646 92646 ' 92646
153--351-21 153-351-22 153-351-23
LIMA CTMINO CHARLES DBRATTIS ARNOLD, P. ADAMS
9421 VELARDO DR. 9411 VELARDO DR. I9401 VELARDO DR.
HUNTI:IGTON BEACH , CALIF. HUNTINGTON BEACH , CALIF. HUNTINGTON BEAClf , CALIF
92646 92646 9264 (.
153-362-1.8 153-362-19 i 153-362-•20
DONALD L. STERLING JUNE A . BALLARD tiSTEVE HARJER
19012 HILLSBORO CIRCLE 19022 IIILLS130RO CIRCLE 19032 HILLSBORO CIRCLE
HUNTI;IGTGN FIEACIi, CALIF. HUNTINGTON BEACH , CALIF . HUNTINGTON BEACH , CALIF
92646 92646 92646
153-362-23 153-362-25 153-362--26
D014ALD W. WALTERS ABRAHAM L. WALKER STEVEN ti. TIERNEY
19071 HILLSBORO CIRCLE 9371 LITCHFIELD DR . 9381 LITCHFIELD DR.
HUNTINGTON 6EACH, CALIF . HUNTI?'GTON BE.ACIi , CALIF. HUNTI.NGTON BEACH , CALIF
92646 92646 9264j:
1, 53-362 -27 153- 362••28 153-362 -29 �J
14TCI1AEL L. RIC:HARD ROSALIE M. METZGER MELVIN 2 . HARPER
37:.2 S . MEYLER ST. 19081 MATHEW CIRCLE 19071 MATHEW CIRCLE
SAN PEDRO, CALIF. HUNT114GTON BEACIi , CALIF . HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIF
90731 92646 9264(,v
153--362-30 153-362-31 153- 362-32
11A."l-EL M. SKINNER t•)F.[,VTN I . 111,RPER MELVIN 1 . HARPER
j 1.90fil:1. MAT11CLAW CII;CI,E 19041 MATHEW CIRCLE 19031 MATHEW CIRCLE
HUNTJ.NGTON BEACH, CALIF . imicri NG'I'ON VV.ACI{ ! C111,I F . _�_HUN'I'1 NCTON BEACH I CA 1,l '
Publish 5/10/84
NOT LCE OF PUBLIC IIEARING
ZONE CASE NO. 83-10
NOME IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council
of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center,
Huntington Leach, at the hour of 7 :30 P.M. , or as noon Lhereafter as possible
on Monday the 21st day of May , 1984 for the purpose of considering Zone Case
No. 83-10, a request to re-zone 2 . 21 acres located at the southwest corner of
Garfield Avenue and Bushard Street from Office Professional District M) to
Qualified Community Business District (Q-0), subject to the following
i
conditions :
1. Building height shall be limited to one-story or 15 feet, Whichever is
less.
2. Loading and unloading of vehicles from the rear of the development shall
be prohibited.
3. Intensified landscaping shall be provided in setback areas to buffer the
development from adjacent residential uses. A landscape plan shall be
submitted to snd approved by the Depnrtrrent of Development Services and
Department of Public Works.
4. A tine permit application shall be submitted to and approved by the Board
(OVER)
of Zoning Adjustmentr for the entire project prior to the issuance of
building permits.
A legal description is on file in thn. Development Services Department.
e
All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their
opinions for or against paid Lone Case. Further information may be obtained
from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street , Huntington Beach,
California. 92648 - ( 714) 536-5227
DATED May 9, 1984 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
By: Alicia M. Wentworth
City Clerk
�.
Publish
A/26/84
l
NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING
ZONE CASE NO. 83•-10
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council
of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center,
Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7: 30 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as
possible on Monday the ,?!.t'7 • day of May 19 84 .
for th, purpose of considering -- }-,tom rnm* -tvm • '
2av--f Case No. 83-10, a request to re-zone 2, 21 acres located at the southwest corner o ,
Garfield Avenue and Bushard Street from Office Professional District (if) toQCorr unity
B.isiness District ff-Q.
1 . building height shall be limited to one- story or 15 feet,
whichever is less.
2 . Loading and unloarling of vehicles from the rear of the
devr liopwe!it nhatl he prohibited .
3 . Jntensified 1and.,;raping shall be providod in setback areas to
buffer the dev-. Io ment from adjacent residential uses . A
landscape plan shell he submittee. to and approved by the
Department of Development Services and Department of Public
tior k s .
4 . A +.use permit application shall be submir_ted to and approved
by the Board of Zoning Adjustments for the entire project
prior to the issuance of building permits .
All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their
opinions for or against said Zone Case,
Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk , 2000 Main
Street, Huntington Beach , California . 92648 - (714) 536-5227
Gt
DATED`_ m 1984 CITY OF HUNTING TON BEACH
By: Alicia M. Wentworth
Cit,J Clerk
ART CRAFT BUST`"S FORMS A l i t]
r
USE BALL POINT PEN ONLY - PRESS FIRMLY
CASH RECEIPT
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
P.O. BOx I I I
e►, HUNTING ION UEACH,CAL1fCJfMtA 92648
�i (71a1 536 6511
CITY TREASURER - WARNEN G HALL
1 ---
UEPT ISSUING— ?" f tJ � ��` uaTt
►ILCLIVED FROM '
a
l
AMOUNT RECEIVED
ABA
RECEIVED By
ACCOUNT A•.11)UNv7
TOTAL
I
No. 279348 CUSTOMER