Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZone Change 84-10 - Lindborg-Dahl-Hoelscher-Guggenheim - W o / IN .� �1(i I, J�v 1r �y►Art,�e{�wn!t i R01 ^ .4G�'C •�'--� c t i 7UF1-fr F,�irl4 Rol Ceti L'V .iactool O' 'rr ,w,je, i , i .�' ' 1ryd 7u^1. •�� %wMD%1 A f7i'� JalaO iY leiD1w^.pw 'yD� •+' 7 w�K.wr rtrraehr 7. STATE CC CA..FOAN A V 41A Y, count' C( O'a►ige ,,o. •, .� .�.r.-w •.1�, IG�Ytb.` 11Y'1M ' CowttU) y Of 'OAS Cavicf As ftlk`,tto$Morf IV qjM. I iwN di AfcftCq,t� 6L1 rl1� �m a Clhtrn of ,r,t, unitdct 5!a19S Jnd a roS4e111 %0.v%0 of�OnaM!ARnO' t tf1B County af0'esald , am Oval the a,,-e of ef�hteer' ' VDDDA aw1Aro ,v4Mve I t,gnn LOSS t-rrlteq 'af,tnt 001,00 P44 ft.t/E 64•=1.Ln- years ano not a ;Sr!y to or 1nl0,,0S1Pf] r. 11^e DOM* ,.ywollIo M .pact NUPe>tt entlt.eA �natl8r I am a principal Gera ;► lnti Orange ( aflM' �•tl aw ?iwi tMe •10 w ah ert. etWSS u+t1 f+/rCn11y t 04V :oast DAiuY PILOT own wf1,Cn ,} Camb1mo4 th@ AsM?.1 -C'erei asaw Real FMe y am we cw• tiEWS-PRESS nlDwsadpe► 0' ;;t?nerai ;,.'r.(.iat•on y� ,4jo LT • I4'A t tY ;,►iMeO in/' �VDI Sne4 n ine 1, !'p ".' ►osta PAUsa 16 IQ L,.rn " I altaL eeri. l.0un1'� •.,� �'eri►�N S011. Of ti al"I "t'd vcl 1"1al a `�\� ;w►taM��A ttm, �000 U1 YrPii aaa tbr.�Te�Q twn a� f Nurtr.. �tww trw,t taw►-� 01 *mien copy : - a (1 s+k*f1r�l+lrt M tiara w#&,* attacnec ^tergtO -S a r,je anj ,,rn;,�rt e � I►a�w,, I Copy , ,as arlrteC and publis!'ed r. the Costa Mesa + � �, Newport Seam ►'1vrtinglan Beach coummn vAdey `� �� !=``w'•' 'pM 1+e Wi Irvlms. the Soutri Coast Cormrr.unilias arc ..tgk.,1a 1 (Ww4�» � d°n' firM Mai to ;letet�et „.t � f ,•fit C�SI 9QdCh (SSutlS Of Sa(C nBwSaapt)t tpr •' :1. 10'�Mpt1tN •rra.,� RW*lt4 rA4t Xo w11 1-he lsbucm s I of f*a►'+f ca 0 Qk*4 at.*,, to w N tf,it�M 1 ir'1d M I �l�rK �wly./r�I '111M " M un lip?is IV I�nelrttr6onevw6iftir,�tt�tn Dim I declare, under puoalty of perjury, that the tj� ^�. ��. *• �, foregoing is true and correct. October 26 4 • Executed on , S 98 _._._ at Costa Mesq, California. -Ile1 0 / PROOF OF PUBLICATION .% l,. , n, 0 f 0 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Ewe N! .- SNG1L try L Submitted to: honorable Mayor and CI ty Council � Roy ~�� � �9 1 I SubmWedby: Charles W. Thompson, City Adsnin--.esCr Premed by: James W. Pal in , Director , Cevelopr c Subject: ZCNL CHANGE NO . 64-10 ( IN CONJUNCTION WITH LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 84-2, AREA 3 . 2 ) C)'Zv. * ail q 0 __ C��. 0�? Vj w�"r StstsnAnt of Issus, Recormwndition, Analysis, Funding Source, Altemativa Actiam. Attachnwntx-.' C STATEMENT OF ISSVEt Tranewitted for }our consideration is Zone Change No . 64-10, a request by Lindborg-Dahl -Hoelscher/Guggenheim to rezone approximately 7 . 11 acres of property frost, (0 ) R5 (Qualified Office Professional ) to R3 (Medium High Density Residential ) and 3 . 29 acres of property from (0) R5 to MI -A (I:nDtcricted Msnufactuxing) . The subject property is located on the Hest side of Magnolia Street approximately 450 feet north of Warner Avenue . PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION AND RECOMMENDATIONt The Planning Commission held 4 public hearing on the zone change request an October 16 , 1984 . On motion by ,Li. vengood ane. second by Higgins Zone Change No . 194-10 was approved to (G ) R3 and (0 ) MI-A with the iol lowing conditions on the "0" , and recommended to the City Council for adoption by the following vote: AYES : Higgins , Winchell . Livengood, Porter , Erskine . Schustacher ,, M i r jahanq i t NOES t Noise ABS ENT t None ABSTAIN: Done Conditions on "0" 1 1 . Any future development will be ,subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission. 2 . At the tine of development the project `shall be required to cover 0s,e flood control channel between Magnolia Street and Warner Avenues . 3 . The proposed project shall be designed and l ayed out to be cowpali-tAe with the adjacent single family residential tract to the west. no 441 4 . The project entrance off Magnolia Street shall be aee igned to City standards and compatible with the adjacent commercial center to the south . 5 . The project shall address the closure of Conner Drive to the satisfaction of the Ctty ' s Fire Lepartme3nt. 6 . The area zoned MI -A shall be 1irA ted to mini -storage uses . FINDINCSa 1 . Zie R3 and M1-A :coning vould be ,vonsi tent with the Mixed Use designation in Land Uce Element Ar.endm ;nt No . 84-2 . 2 . Reroniny the site to accommodate apartments and mini-warehouses would be comptititle with surrounding land uses . STAFF RECOMMENDATION : Staff is recommending denial of Area 3 . 2 of Land Use Element Amendment No . 63-2 . As such ., staff recommends denial of concurrent Zone Chtsnge No . 84 - 10 with the followir.y f indinys : 1 . The proposed F3 and M! -A Zoning is not consis!-ent with the recommended retention of the Gene al Commercial designation In (and Use Element Amendment No . 84-2 . 2 . Rezoning the site to accomemodate mini -warehouses and apartments would be incoml.axible with surrounding land uses , ANAI.YS i S : The applicant, L:no-burg-Dahl-Hoelscher/c.uggenheim, has requested a redes ignation of approximately 10 . 4 acres of land from (WR5 (Qualified Office Prcjfessi� nal ) to P3 (Medium Lenssity Residential ) and MI-A (Restricted Manufacturing ) to accommodate a proposed mixed development of apartments and mini -warehouses . ,he applicant has indicated that there is a three year surplus of vacant office space in the City and that they have tried unsuccessfully since: 1980 to market an office devel-sopment on the site . The planning Comm-ies ion, at its October 16 , 1984 meeting, concurred with the applicant ' s contention that an office designation on the site is unmarketable . They also agreed that office development on this site would reduce the demand for office development along Beach Boulevard and in the Downtown area where the City is actively promoting such development . For these reasons the Planning Commission is recommending approval of the applicant ' s request . The area proposed for medium high density apartments would -he located on the east 7 . 1 acres of the site and would be abutted by existing commercial developments on the east (across Magnolia Street in Fbuntain Valley) and south, the San Diego .Freeway on the north , and the proposed mini-warehouses on the west. Traffic generated by these adjac.3nt uses as well as the access prof lens caused by the site' s close proximity to ( 13046) -2- PCA a 44 the freeway would significantly impact the proposed residential development with noise and other environmental impacts . To help mitigate such impacts would require extensive buffering and noise attenuation. measures . However, it is staff ' s view that the site would not provide a suitable living environment nor be a desirable location for residential development even with the ewplolrent of thence measures . The mini -warehouse development is intended to be located on the west. 3 . 3 acres of the site . The purpose behind the proposed mini -warehouse development and MI-A toning is to provide a buffer between the proposed medium high density apartments any; the existing low density single family neighborhood to the west . Now-ever , the proposed warehouses and Ml-A zoning constitutes an irr)ustrial use , and it would be spot planning and zoning to place such a use in an area surrounded by residential uses . Warehouses should most appropriately be restricted to Identified industrial areas in the City, i .e . , the Central Industrial Corridor and the northwest Industrial Parks adjacent to the McDonnell-Douglas complex . Given the cliaracter of the surrounding land user , the existing R5 zoning designation would be the most appropriate use of the site. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : The environmental impacts of Zone Change No . 84 -10 are addressed in Environmental Impact Peport No . 84-3 which also covers Land Use Elemeni Amendment No. 64-2 . The Cit } Council must approve EIR No . 84-3 before approving this zone change . ALTERNATIVE ACTION : If the City Council approver, the applicant ' s request for Area 3 . 2 of Lund Use Element Amendr►ent No . 64-2 , the Council may adopt Zone Change No. 84-10 w i th a "0" on the zoning . Staff wcu 1 d recommend that the conditions be divided between the two proposed zoning designations as follows : Conditions on "0" Ml -A: i . Any future development will be subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit by the planning Commission . 2 . At the time of development the project shall be required to cover the flood control channel between Magnolia Street and Warner Avenues . 3 . The proposed project shall be designed and laved out to be compatible with the adjacent single family residential tract to the west . 4 . The project shall address the closure u f Conner Drive to the satisfact+on of the City' s Fire Department . 5 . The area zoned MI-A shall be limited to mini-storage uses . (1304d) -3- hCA r � Conditions on "0" i-3 : 1 . An,. future development will, to subject. to approval of a Conditional User Permit b} the Planning Commission . 2 . At the time of development the project shall be required to cover the flood control channel between Magnolia Street and Warner Avenues . 3 . The proposed project shall be designed and laved out to be compatible with the adjacent single family reaidential tract to the went .. 4 . The project er! tra:,ce off Magnolia S tr-.,et shall Le designed to City standards and compatible with the adjacent commercial center to the scuth , ATTACHMENTS % 1 . Staff Report dated October 16, 1984 2 . Ordinance JWP: EiS :a jh ( 1304 d) -4- JtrA 11 -5-84 . . CQ _ I r I y r _ 1 •-• _ a .. of : ::�—'• — . .. zcs+- Io mD HUWW#G=ON MAC" PLAPMING DIVISION huntington beech development Services department SrAf f �.,R E P 4 R- TO: Planning Commi t;n ion FROM: Levelopment Services DATE: October 16 , 1904 SUBJECT: ':ONE: CHANGF: NO . 84 -10 ( IN CONJUNCTIGh WITH LUE Es4 -2 , Area 3 . 2 ) APPLICANT: Lindborg-Dahl DATE ACCEPTED: lice lscher/Gugger:heim .July fl 9—4 17220 Newhope St . 1226 Mountain Valle} , CA 9270E REQUEST: To rezone approx i ma to I y MANDAIORY PSOCESS I NG CATL t 7 . 11 acres of lirope r t}, Not AFpl cable from (Q ) R5 (Qualified f Office Professional ) to h3 (Medium fl igh Dens i t } Residential ) , and 3 . 29 acreF of property f roir (G) R5 (Cua l i f i ed Gf f i ce i Professional ) to MI -A (Restricted Manufacturinv ) LOCATION: Subject proper t } is located ZONE. : west of Magnolia Street ana (Q) P5 (office approximately 450 feet Professional ) north of innrner Avennue . ACREAGE: 10.4 GENERAL PLAN: General Commercial EXISTIUG USE: AgrMultural Greenhouses 1 .0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Staff recommends that the Planning Comr,i ss i on deny Zone Change No . 84-10 . 2 .0 GENERAL INtOWATION: 1 Inttiated by Ltndborg-Dahl -Hoelscher/Guggenheim, Zone Change W . 84 -10 is a request to rezone the property located west of Magnolia Street and approxiratel k 450 feet north of Warner Avenue from (OR5 i C- 3 C a ,b ,►Ilk (Qualified Of f ice Profess ior%al ) to TO (hieaium Iiigli I,e:nsity Residential ) and MI -A ( Restricted Manufacturing ) . This tone change is being considered concurrently with Lana Use Lletent Amendment ho. 84 -2 . Area 3 . 2 . 3 .0 ENVI RONMEMAl. STATES i The subject proF,erty is addressed in craft Unvironn.entcal Impact Report No . 84-3 for LUL 64-2 which Is being processed concurrently with this zone change . Pursuant to the envirortmental regulations in effect tit this time , the Del)artretit. of Gevelopa.ent Services posted draft Environmental Impact Relvrt No. 114 -3 for a 45-day comment and review period which ended oc tot,c,r Is" , 1984 . 4 .0 S MOUNDI NG LAN) USE, ZONING, At.) Gf-NEPAi. PLAN L E.S I GNI,T IONS : Su�j! r t Pro_eill: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Com<iterc i a 1 MNE: (Q) 16 (Qualified Cffice Froteanirntil ) LAND USE: Aqr i cul tural Greenhouses North of Subject Proper t}• : GENERAL PLAN :DESIGNATION ; Low LeItbit y Ite a i uent i a 1 ZONI. : CE - I. (Coaltnuni t } taci 1 i t y-Lducational ) LAND t!SI•:: 1- 1e•nrntar � School / Frevuni tast_ of Subject Proper t (Ci t of fountain Vallel ) : ,41, 11M. PLAN DESIGNATION : Commercial Recreation ZGNL: Comr.ercial 1vcreation LAND US E:t Amusement 1'a rk/Mote 1 South of Subject Propert}: GENERAL. PLAN DESIGNATION; General Commercial ZONE: C2 (Communit} business Listrict ) LAND USE: Shopping Center West: of Subject Pro�ert} : GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Lnw i:ens i ty Residential ZONE% R1 ( L-ow Denoity Residential ) LAND USE: Single - family horr.es 5 . 0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS % The applicant , Lindborg-Dahl -Hoe I setter/Guggenhe:im, ling requested a redesignatiot% of approximately 10 .4 acres of land from (4)R5 (Gualifti office Professional ) to R3 (Medium lernsi ty Residential ) and MI -A ( Restricted Mat:ufacturing ) to accommedate a proposed mixed development of apartments and mini -wareliouses . The area proposed for taedium higl: density apartments would be located on the earn 7. 1 acres of the site and would he abutted by existing commercial developa,ents on the east (acroee Magnolia Street in Fbuntain Valley ) and south, the San Giego Freewal on the north , and the Proposed mini -warehouses on the west . Traffic generated by these adjacent uses as well as this access problems caused by the site ' s close proxtEit} to the Ereewa} would significantly impact the Proposed residential development with noise and other environmental impacts . To help mitigate such impacts would require extensive buffering and noise attenuation measures . However , it in staff ' s view that the site would not provide a suitable living environment nor be a desirable location for residential development even with the employment of these measures . The mint -warehouse development is intended to be located on the west 3 .3 acres of the site . The purpose behind the propx)sed rAni -warehouse development and ti l -A zoning is to prov i ;'e a buffer be t.aeen the proposed medium high density apartments and the existing lo% density single-family neighborhood to the west . However , the propoced warehouses and MI -A zoning constitutes an industrial use , and it would be spot planning and zoning to F:1 ace such a use in att area surrounded by residential uses . Warehouset: should most a,pproFriately be restricted to ide?ttified industrial areas in the City, i .e . , the Central Industrial Corridor anti tt:e northwest Industrial Parks adjacent to the McDonnell-Douglas complex . Given the character of the surrounding land uses , the existing h5 roning designation V-ouln. Le the most approFriat.e use of the site , 6 . 0 hECGMMENUATIGN: Staff recommends that the Platen i tiq Commission cseny Zone C11+111ge No . 84 -10 with the following f i ndi nqs; after action has been taken on Lan(: Use Element Amendment No . 84-2 . FINDINGS : 1 . The A3 and MI -A zoning would Le inconsistent with the recommended retention of the commercial designation in Land Use Element Amendment No . 64-2 . 2 . hezoning tree site to accommodate apartments and mini -warehouses would be incompatible with surrounding land uses . ATTACUMENTS : 1 . Area Map 2 . Crdinance JWP :C :a jh ( 1266d) --1- S try f f F.er<)r t 10-1 b-64 �,...C'M; JutA+C P!'ei!C r�3 r Ine �rJAr Cr u„ri ,7/ 01art;i• ,—unt• �.�.�.......,.,.. 1.�`4 ,�r�4 ;y 4�pr�n,aw+ 'yA� Ir4 LAMP t"tiL OW -J4-=•LN,M-1 A rir K 1'�at Y�VbrC to" r--w--^-���^ •�1r t>h MM1 t:y t►w GA>t�>wr•} i�d,n.t�►q►of►+„r+t,�:ar, Je wS ««, notch. )A N►* coNct, • r• c.i-► .•�+• -4�1 ASK K ti 44g.L an ro ' d Citizen Jr l~@ ,Jnttec; Scares JnO a rNsttlHrlt Gt 0 &V ift the County d'Gresard i am Av6► Me a5t' Gt erg'1f6er !1©f "rw um tw"W" d 61%1 year. and not a party to Gr Interestea ,r. s,e oeiow + c:rr.rrrw-rwrtte~u� ft. xv , rMc'• .l�l "Canht�•t 41 ent+t+eC ^utter am. a ;rincl�ai c,e►k of the Orange Y44 �• c«� �u.tCA wi. MAC ""90004 -1;?W" Coast 3A,Lv G" vtirtn rvr' Ch S CGmOrneC tr•+e �j An*2.1 ,amsma"d' W$m%iiCaR►Ur►04Zt lhi• ,%EWS•ppESS a ne*scaDer c' cererar c,rcu+at.or. . , . i to rw arintec a^C �uri.snea ir- tre (;.ty Cif Costa Mesa. �Vr 1LAquog.`. If) I'll lrr•r! um Cou^t•, ct 3•ange Statf� C30cvnia a^c that W rs. 1" 0",...,,� :.,and ':s c F.I e e n: (i*wmt i'spar rr�n. artr IN0�iCe 0 • --._ es War+► d ra OW %too Ncft's Um" W%4 40-ou'l 41"Aioy !" fat ww% of, Warr 4• Avow* f-crh rr ar,.r at.ac-ek: nerelo 's a true ar',u' complele ryl^oYsVdro6c:OWaNi FA�1+tlr, , copy +ray �' "t8C Ilia auoiisr-ea ,n the Cosla Mesa. ' Aa a 3.,4 -cm 4r- WWI 01, y@w;,t)rt Sea;,'+. -+u"Slr,ylOn Seat^ ;1-untarn Vailey rr+.rrr 4!a IM Cann of Irvine. ir-e Soot-� Coast cofnmunrtres ara .agur-a + , \ � tK� �GarvrV* >it0to Seact" rs5ue5 of saiC newspaper far -_',' j f►v, 4.10 wouir" r•. ats+inale I""w%Omwp ' fiQ�'} fIS�•1{rXQ}t�R«146'r:G wit the ;ssuels► of (C)fts,k0uMfoi,dOwe Prd4•MbonA Vwx1o) comfeil t1tliA.tJ &#4 !41•+l '9{�t ri4'utsmort Cam_octo'Lez 2b gti ` . t� _ film at�t~tt' 'c�►s. IdfM�!`A'N p�14 N t• I,�tunt•Cor1c'rlArrar'Onf v�OytYtfnS N +flia.�l+l� !Oi ltiiMh AMni'st`mt/ wltih wo � �li►Q�MMIwn: !i• rt igr.elt+h . '98 43 . r *C .' rerb�wA it tl+,. OcbM+ 1s, ceclare, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. �� ON. lot er wit -f,ON 44%to I '"IWO o.rtr�r l�Mrty►,t„rM �9 Executed on c to o c r �_ 158 _� �► ' AN" N"Woo ld� &. at Costa Mesa, Calt,orma. ' + sw •>r '`"'' iw RIFV �r �. taw hem-Pikoft awl Arw � . C4ks'. KACtlt;l 'PROOF OF PUBLICATION 0 0 4 . The pro jer t en trance off ►Magnc l to b t reet t;ha i I be saes i gned to City standards and compatible �. ► th t.►ts ad a+cent commercial center to the south . 5 . The: pro;,e = t shall acdress the closure of Corner Gr ..vo to the satisfaction of the Ctty ' ri kite Department . G . The .%rea zor a .' M 1-A st:-: 11 be I i r.i to c to r i n i-s for age uses . HNDINCS : l . 'she RJ and Fil--A nor. t ncs koul o be cons i 5 tent kith the Mi xec Lb#.' aesignat ion in Land Use F.tecet. t Amenamiunt No. 64 -2 . 2 . Rezoning the site to accor,r.odate al;artments and mini--warehouses wood c; I cc,.patible with surrounning land t1r,es . STAFF RE".0P..vE.% A;'10,%: Staf f is recommending denial of Area 3 . 0-- of Lanc. cue Llement Amendment No . 63-2. As such, staff recommends denial of concurrent Zone Change No . 64-10 with the following findings : i . The proposed R3 anti MI--A zoning is not consistent with the recG=ended retention of the General Commercial designatio-i » � in (and Use Element Amendment No . 64-2 . 2 . Rezoning the site to accoms:odatc min► -warehouses and apartments wot:lc be incoml.atible with surrounding land uses . ANALYS 1 S: The ._pplir.ant, Lina`borg-Dahl-tioetacher /Gugrenheic., has reque,steca it redesignation of approximately 10 .4 _% re b of land from (Q) R5 iCualif ied office Professional ) to it3 (Medtur. Lensity Residential ) an6 MI --A (Fter.tricted Manufactur '.ng ) r,o accor.mdate a proposed mixed development of apartments and mini. -warehouses . The applicant has indicated that there is a three year surpi"s of vacant o t z i�, a space in the City ana that they have tried unsuccessf4lly since 196 to rairket an office development on the site . The Planning Cor%zission, at ith October 16 . 1964 meeting , concurred with tLe appIxeant ' s contention that all office designation on the site is unmarne^.,tbli� . They also agreed that off ice development on this site would reduce the cer~anu for office development along 3each Boulevard and in the Lown►.own area where the City is actively promoting such deve.oprient . Yor these reasons the Planning Commission is recommending approval of the applicant ' s request . e area proposed for ur+erdium high density apartments would be locates) n the east 7. 1 acres of the :rite and would be abutted by ezisiting onmercial developme:Zts o: the east (across Magnolia Street in Fountain alley) and south , the San Diego Freeway on the north, and tbo proposed �. ini --warehouses on the west . Ti:afftc r,,tnerated b) these ad;acent uses well as the access probler.s caused by the site ' s tiles* proximity to .�r/ REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Datectiu^, ?R , ,v Submittad to: honorablc Mayor ano City Council r • Submitt©dby: Chiirler; W . Tht:)mpson , City Adr.inistrato Prepared by: .:ari,es h . 1l:1I in , GtzectUt . C-eveloF,c;ent. Services Q v ' • Sub)a-t: ZIONL CHANGE \; 1)4- 10 ( lip CONJ UNC7,10N W 1 1 H LAN., USE ELL MENT A.XE�NJDME T hC . 64 -2 , A1<EA 3 . 2 M. Statemont of Issua, Rocommendatlon, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATF:,":E(tiT CF ISSUE : Transmitted for your consideration is Zone Change No . 64-10 , a request by to rezone approximately 7 . 11 acres of property Ir-om (G ) R5 (Oualifiecs Office Professional ) to R3 (Meoiu;. Nigh Density Kesidenti" ) and 3 . k9 acres of propert} frog (Q ) R5 to ( Rest..rictec Manufacturing ) . The sub-,Qct property if. located on the w'e.`.'it eide of Magnolia Street ap t'oxiirately 450 feet north of warner Avenue . _-.. - LANNING COMAISS :ON ACTION ANE) iiECON.N.ENVATICisi The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the ror.�L- charge request on October 16 , 1964 . On motion by Livengood and second by t:tcgins Zone Change No . 64-10 was approved to (6 Rs i1nd (0) M1 --'. with the following conditions or, the "0" , and recomm* ended to the r. i t} Council for adoption by the followinc vote : AYES : Higgins , winchell , Livengood, Porter , Erskine, Schumacher , Mir ;ahang it NOES : None ABS'aT: hone ABSTAIN% done Conditions or. "C" : w 1 . Any future development will be sub ;ect to approval of a Conditional Use Permit Ly the Planning Commission. 7 . At the time of development the protect shall be required to cover the flood control channel between Magnolia Etreet and warner Avenues . s4w"3 . The proposed faro,ec t shall be designed and layed out to be compatible with the ac3acent single family residential tract to the west. V Conditions on "C " 1%3 : i . Any future development will be sub ject to approval of a Conditional User Permit by the Planning Commission . . 2 . At the tine of cevelopment proDect shall be required to cover the flood control chanr.el between Magnolia Street and Warner Avenue& . 3 . The proposed project t;hal l be oes igned and layed out to be compatible with the adjacent single family residential tract to the west . 4 . The project entrance off Magnolia Street shall be designed to City standards and compatible with the aajacent commercial center to the south . ATTACHMENTS : 1 . Staff Report crated October 16 , 1964 2 . Ordinance J,Ogp : iiS : a ;h the freeway wau:,i s !.gr.i f %cantly ir:.pact ti-.e ;:roposeo real cer.tia1 development with noise end other env ► ronrentr.l impacts . To help mitigate such impacts wou: c. req"ire extensive buffering and noise attenuation =*asures . however , it is utaff ' y view that the s ► te wou: c not provide a sui.*able livint, environment r.or be a desirable location foa residential development even with the ezployment of these measures . The nxni -ware;Ouse aevelopment. is intenr:ec to b,:. :ocatea on the west 3 .3 acres of the site . Thc, purpose behind t'c,e proposed mini --warehouse development and M1 -A zon inch Is to provide it buffer between the proposes medium nigh censity aparttr,:nts and the existing low eensity single family neighborhood ;n the west . However , the proposeL warehouser, and MI-A zonir.0 constitu an ine.ustr ►al use , ana it would be spot planning and zoning to place such a use in ar, area surrouncec by residential. uses . harehour:eu should most appropriately be restricted to iucatifted industrial a. eas in the C1*, ► .e . , the Central Industrial Corriaor anci the ;orthwefit Industrial Parks ad;acent to the McDonnell-Douglas complex . Given the character of the surroundtnr, lar:c uses , the existing R5 zoning aesignat ► or, would be the most appropriate use of the site . E,�.VI k0NIMEM.'A1. STA T i;S : The environmental impacts o ! Zone Change No . 64 -IC are adoressea EnvironmrarAt.al Impact Report No . 64-3 wl ►ch also ceveru Lanni Use Ele:nvnt Amendment No . 64-1 . The C e t } CoLnce l rust approve EIR No . 64-3 be ,ore ' approving this zone chan5-� . ALTERNA':IVE ACT.►GN : If the City Council, arproves the applA scant ' s request for Area 3 . ,! of Land Use Element Arend;.vnt No . 64 -2 , the CQ►:ric ► l may aeopt 'Lone Chlinge No . 84-10 with a "C" or, the zoning . Staff wo►. l d reccmrend that the conditions be eivi6eo betv%eon the two proposer, zoning destgnatio»s ab follows : Conditions on 1 . Any future: development ►, i l . ce sub ;ect to approval r-f a Conditional Ube Permit by tll-ry Planning Comallssion . 2 . At the time of develc l.nent the: pro ;ect iihall be required to cover the f 1cod control ch anne l between Magnolia Street and Warner Avenues . 3 . ':hey proposed pro ;zct s1hall be designed and layea out to be compatible with the ac ;acer. t single liar.► : y residential tract to the we b t . 4 . The protect shall aad.ess the closure of Conner Drive to the satisfaction of the Ctty' rs Fire ;;apartment . ; . :he area zoned MI -A shall be, : invited to mini -storage usfs . 1304d -3- NCA VO STA f f huntington beach development sefvice>; department 0 � .. REPORT.— ■�wr...rear.n.. ■�.+�r...w.��rnur.r�■�.�.■rr.�rf TO: Planning Commission FROMI Developcent Services DATE: October 16 , I M4 SUBJECT: ZONE ►HANGE NO . 64-10 ( IN CONJUNCTION WITH LUE 64 -2, Area 3 . 2 ) APPLICANT: Lindborg-batil DATE ACCEPTcOr Noe 1 scher/Gt:c;gc►nhc i r,; Jul '. 1 1 , 1984 1 17220 Newhope.• St . t226 Fountain Valley . CA 92708 REQUEST: ^o rezone approximat.el y MANDATORY PROCESSI`G CATi. : 7 . 11 acres of property Not Applicable from (Q ) R5 (Qualified Office Professional ) to h3 (Medium Iitgh Dense ty Residential ) , and 3 . 29 acres of property iron. (C ) '� RS (Cualtfied Office Pro fear i ona 1 ) to ,1,11.1 -A ( Res triCteel Manufactur tncg ) ., LOCATION: :ub;,ect prol:er !. } is located Z0,14L west of Ma(inol in Street ano (C R5 (Office approximately 450 feet Profebbional ) north of Warner Avennue . j ACREAGE: io .4 GLNLRAL PLAN : General Coinnwrcta1 i 1 EX;STING USEt Agiicu togas Greenhouses 1 . 0 SU%GE.STED ACTION : Staff recommends that the Planning Commission c:en) Zont Change No . 84-10. 2 .0 GLNERAL I NF ORMAT 10h : initiated by Lindbotg-Lbhl -Noslaeher /Guggenhetx.t Zones Change 1%o . w..J 84-10 is a terutht to rezone the property located west of Miagnc i .,% Street end approx i MA to l } 450 feet north of Warmer Avenue from to : r C . 3 iffIN Dr�---r --- - 0 '_M to, to • it w w I ✓ w - �. 1 ."i/ �•� A 1 Cal - . � .. � „ t � ■, � •� All s w • .If ZC-64-- 10 � �1(�M t c y��F•y N NUNTINGfOm IEACN PLANS:N;. ©WStON +ram.. ter.. M wrW..r.-�...�.� .�.•-.�-� ������ �. - �-�..� Ws � and wou16 lie obutte t b) ex ist ► nc) rc;tr,rercial ae.•ve lopmenti. on the (across Magnol is Street in Fountain Valley) and south , the San Ctryc freewa} on t1he nortt:, ana the proposed r.ini -warehouses on the west . Traffic generated by these ad3.scen t uses as well an the access prcI)1 e r s caused by the E itp ' s cloue proxi a ty to the f reeway would signs f ican 't 1 } impact the proposed resIdontial e,e.•vvlopment with not se and other environ-cntal impacts . 7c, hull r.o tigaty such 1 ..►pact5 would reyuILO Gxt.enslve huf ferinej and i! t te!nl,yt ion re-asurOb . however , it is sth f f ' s view that the si tV wOul (i r.rit l): ovide :i sot tht'.1e 1 XV% nq iunvironme.:it nor be a desirable location for resiuentia development even with the employrr.nnt of theses measures . Thr rAni -warehouse cevelopment it, intended tc i;e loca :ec on the west 3 . 3 acres of tLe site . The p►iryuse behind tt a proposed mini -ware-house development and MI-A zontncj is to provide a bLffer between the propose: medium high density apartr.ents anti the existing lo% aenr-ity single-family neighborhood to the west . however , the proposed warehouses and MI-A zoning consti totes an t nrustr la: ►use , and it wckA: c he slat planning and zcninn to place such a use in an area surrouncec by residential uses . karc.houses shoulu ;rust apprcjpriatel ?- be restricted to identified industrial areas in the City, i , e „ the Central Indi.strial Corridor anti the northwest Industrial Parks to the .k.ct'onr,cil-Doug las complex . Given the character of the surrounding lance uses , the existing 16 zoning designation wouie Lei they most apl:ropriate use of the rite . G .(, 1%LCOMMENDATI ON : S ttl f f i ccommen6s t h a t t hr I' 1 .inn 1 r i q Cn;, i ss ion deny Zone C)i,jr,Oet ;.c, . 64 - 10 with the followir►. iin0ings after action has bear. uikeri can 1-amp. Use Element Amendment No . 64 --2 . FINDINGS : 1 . The R3 and M.: -A zoning v oui r, be : %cons i s tent with the recommended retention of the comirercial designation in Lane i- s', Element Amencment No . 64 -2 . 2 . Rezoning the site to accotmodate apartments and mini -wareho►;ye .N would be incompatible with surrounding land ur,es . AT:ACHM::i`T S : i A;eye Map 2 . Grdinance Jwp :cl-a )h 7 (Gualitied Office Professional ) to A3 %'N001uM 1;1gh Lent: ity Residential ) and MI -A ( Restri :ted Manufacturing ) . This zone change is twe incl consi dr red concurrently with Land Use Ele r,,ent. Ayenament No , 134 -2 , Area 3 . 2 . 3 . 0 ENVIRONMENTAL S;A'"U.% : The uub sec t property Is a(,c,russt-e d in draft Env i ronr..en t a l Impact Report No . 84-3 for LUE. 84-2 which is 1)vi ,g processeea concurrent 1 } with this zone change . PUrs►,ant to the environments : regulations it, effect at this time, the Department. of 1:evelopr..ent_ SCtvices poster draft Environmental Impact. Pt-f-ort No . 64 -3 for a 45 -ray comment anci review period Which en0eed Octot,eer 12 , 1964 . 4 .0 SUhROUNDING LAV, A:.It C,t.NLRAL PLAN LLSICKATIONS : Subject Property; GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION : Genera : Corarercia1 GONE: (G ) R5 (Qualifier; Gf licea Professional LAND USE: Agricuitural Greenhouses North of SubLect Property: . GL,%rRAL PLAN D1:S IC,NAT ION : 1-ow Res i con t is l ZONIt C1•-1_ (Corr.unity Facility--Educational ) LAhi; USE: Elvnentar i School / FYe:ewaw Las ;. of Sub;ect Projerty (City of fountain Valle: CiJ9HIAL PLAN DESIGNATION : Commercial Recreation Z NI : Concr,ercial 1%eecreattoti LAND USE: Amusement Park/Motel South of SLb ect PropLer t1 : GENERAL PLAN DE.41 GNAT 10N: General Commercial ZONE: C2 ;Comr- -.-o t � business Gistrict ) LAND USE: Shopping Center West of Subject Prc: .c� ,rt � . GENERAL PLAN DLL I GNA710N: lxi% 7.er,r, i t }y Res i nent i a 1 'LONG.: N1 ( ld'% Density Residential ) LAND USE: Single- famt ly hones 5 . 0 ISSUES AND ANALYS; S : -Ile appIic fin t , Li nobor9-t,.ti1, 1 -1toe l sche: /Cugtienhe % a. , liltts requeatea a rrdes1gnation of apllroxi2--ate1 i +? . 4, acres of I ,%ni iron (Q ) F.5 (Quaii : ic of f ice rrofessionai ) to 1.3 (Mecw um LAlnsi ty Kesicentlal ) and MI -A ( Restricted Manufacturing ) to acc:orsocia to A propcscd rt xed dove lol•rc:: t of apartments and The area proF-vbe►d for Q�ee3iva. }� tgtl density apartment& wroulu he located on the east 7. 1 acres of the a, it•a ., ft 0 Street , a distan-c o: 516 . 56 fact to the nor- therly line of the Orange %or.nLy Flood Control District Channel , as recorded in gook 6i09 , pag4' 684 of off is ial records of* na id county; t+tenee north 89032 ' 38 " went along the northerly line of said channel a distance of 61 . 40 fees_ to a point on the wonterly line of a deed to the State of California as recorded in Book 6375 , page 602 of official records of said county , said point being the true point of beginning ; thence north 89032138 " west along the northerly line of said channel a distance of 420 . 77 to the beginning of a curve concave southerly staving a radius of. 227. 00 feet ; thence westerly along said northerly line 27 . 73 feet along said curve through a cen- tral angle of 6059 ' 58" to Point A; thence north 00018137" cast leaving said northerly line a distance of 610 . 52 feet ; trience south 69031153" east a distance of 119. 33 fact; thence north 00028107" east a distance of 40. 00 feet to a point on the southwesterly line of said deed to the State of California , said point being also on a curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 400 . 00 teet a radial lire through said point �! bears north 54035 ' 56 " east ; thence south- l�,1 easterly along said southwesterly line 81 . 95 feet along saki curve through a central angle of 11,044119" ; thence south 47008123 " east along said southwesterly line a distance of 265 . 96 fret to the- beginning of a curve concave southwesterly having a radius of 200 .00 feet ; thence south-- easterly along said southwesterly line 155 . 12 feet along said curve throut;6h a central angle of 44026 ' 14 " ; thence south 02041159" east alo;:g said southwesterly line a distance of 337. 23 feet to the true point of oeginnlna. subject to the follow: 03 conlitions : ,. . Any f ut,::e deve lopaient M i 11 no subject to approval by the Planning Coy.-nniss:on of a conditional use perrr,it . 2 . At the tine of dove:oprnent the protect snail include , su:,- 3ect to approval by Orange Coc•nt;f , covering the flood control channel between Magnolia Street and Warner Avenue. 3 . The proposed design and isyout of the project shall be compatible with the adjacent single- family residential tract to ''a 0 2. 19 v 41 w ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE s7F THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING Tlik. iiC;NTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE. BY AMENDING SECTION 9061 O P-ROVIDE FOR CHANGE OF ZONING FROM QUALIFIED OFFICE PROFESSIONAL DISTRICT TO QUALIFIED MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESI - DENTIhL DISTRICT AND TO QUALIFIED RESTRICTED MANI3FACTURI`G DI S'T'RIC i ON REAL PROPERTY GENER- ALLY LOCATED NEST OF MAGNOLIA STR.EB: AND NORTH OF WARNER AVENUE (ZONE CASL NO. 84 -10) WHEREAS , pursuant to the state Planning and Zoning Law, the Huntington Beach Planning Commission and Huntington Beach City Council have had separate public hearings relative to Zone Case No . 84-10 wherein both bodies have carefully considered all in- formation presented at said hearings , and after due considerar_ i;.)n of the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission and all evidence presented to said City Council , the City Council finds that such zone change is proper , and consistent with the general plan , LOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does ordain as follows : SECTION 1 . The following described real property, generally located west of Kagnolia Street and 450 feet north of Werner Avenue , :s hereby changed from (Q) R5, "Qualified Office Professional District" to (Q ) R3 , "Qualified Medium Nigh-density Residential District : " PARCEL 1 , (0) 0 : Commencing at the centerline intersection of Warner Avenue with .Magnolia Street , said centerline intersection being also the southeast corner of Section 24 , Township 5 South , Range 11 Nest ; thence north 00018 ' 50' east along ttie east line of said section , said east line oeing also the centerline a Magnolia 7RCS hb1 jr ,'B4 • � Rev . compatible with the ad3acent single- family residential tract to the west. 4 . The Fire Department shall specify the means by which com- piete or partial closure of Conner Drive shall be accomplished . 5 . The area zoned 141 -A shall ne limited to mini -storage uses . SECTION 3 . Section 9061 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code , District Map 27 ( Sectional District Map 24- 5-11 ) , is here117 amended to reflect the change contained in this ordinance arld on the map attached hereto . The Director of Development Services An hereby directed to prepare cnd file an amended map. A copy of 1 said district map, as amended h�?reby, is available for inspection in the office of the City Clerk . SECTION 4 . This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after its passage . PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the________ day of , 1984 . i�Itl Mayor ATTEST : APPROVED AS TO FOR.' : % City C1erK City Attorney S REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED: city Administrator irrctor v of Deelopment services the west . 4 . Access to the project snall he off mtagnolia Street , shall meet city standards and specifications, and shall be compatible with the adjacent commercial center to the south . SECTrON 2 . The following described real property , generally located west of Magnolia Street and 450 feet north of warner Avenue , is hereby changed from (Q) R5 , "Qualified Office Professional District" to (Q) M1 -A , "Qualified Restricted Manufacturing District : " PARCEL 2 , (Q ; Mi -A: Beginning at Point A, de- scribed in Parcel 1 , said point being on the nor- therly line of said channel , said point bang also on a curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 227 . 00 feet ; thence southwesterly along said northerly line 175.98 feet along said curve through a central angle of 44025106" ; thence north 00018138 " east leaving said northerly line a distance of 889 . 3E feet to a point on the north line of the south half of the southeast quarter of said section ; thence south 8g03l * 53* x east along said north line a distance of 201 .96 feet to a point can the westerly line of said deed to the State of California , said point being also on a curve concave northeasterly havinq a radius of 40Q . 00 feet , a radial line through said point bears north 79001123" east ; thence south- easterly along said westerly line 170 . 51 feet along said curve through a central angle of 24025127" ; thence south 00028107 " west leavinq said westerly line a distance of 40. OG fret ; thence nortn 89031151" west a distance of 119 . 33 feet ; thence south 000181370 west a distance of 610 . 52 feet to the point oar, beginning . subject to the following condition, : 1 . Any future development shall. tie subject to approval by the Planning Commission of a conditional use permit . 2. At the time of development , the project shall include , subject to approval by Orange County, covering the flood control channel between Magnolia Street and Warner Avenue . 3 . The proposed design and layout of the project shall be t� all 3. 0 PLANNING ZONING DM SECTIONAL MSTR ; C i MAP 24- 5- 11 . . 1..•! CITY 01� •••QI111 give .•.. ,. 1. :.«I••M.. .. �... • .�f•.t{ ram\ .1~I •.1.�':1�\-.:. F M..o•• • �.• 111.�1t 1 !0 • r, •1• � ., ••••.1 r,1 r('—")N • • If1 •.. F�N,1.•M HUNTING 13 E A('41 1-1 fit JPI $to to,moo l 1 B A i\ G E COUNTY, ( . 1, I. I '` � � I� 1' � 11 1 1• Mr •'�,: 77 1.•..Iw• ►. «• \ \• •11 J\• 11 .••• .rF..Jw• r .. 1 n w V G \. R 3 I '.s. \� I C 2 i � 1 14 ` 1 • � J 1 r L� l _ 1 � �•..,I' fir'1`..�_ J 1.... "'._..•� � \I—•..• I ; 1. 1 �� _.—..�+��... .. Al—r^Ly • t�w i Al I ��71�'• ' •J {' C ,' r =• C TV ' 1 -- w-- • • .. . 1. �. i `Y` w•i�i• �}`.,,y=s11 •i`}._r. �. J �'1T..-►r-� —'� R, • � slim,t._`. It � � • •. rod -•. ��• � �' Mt 13 , , IF I 1 � f R �iil•.,• .I • �. r ► w Af r RI MIIM• M ZONE CHANGE ti / NO b`-1 0 or