Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZone Change 84-14 - Conditional Use Permit 84-24 - Condition T Authorized 10 Publish Advrrtisements of all Jtcludt pubis notices by Decree of the Superior Court of Orange Counly, California, Number A•6214, dated 29 September, 1961, and A•24831. dated i l June, 1963. STATE OF CALIFORNIA Cou iy of Orange Pwaa MOOR* AdvW"toaeed oy "" AmweMt r w rr 7 por11 with 10 pW coArm Imth 1 am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested In the below entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the Orange Coast DAILY PILOT, with which is combined the NEWS-PRESS; a newspaper of general circulation, ,printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange. State of California, and that a Notice of P.a1hI i c HearI na of which copy,attached hereto is a true and complete copy, was printed and published in the Costa Mesa, Newport Beach,' Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, Irvine, the South Coast communiti..•, and Laguna caacn issues of said nc%vspaper for 1 rime w>AsecstttM�s to wit the issue($) of trifpifts felt gsd� f� August 8 S riles. ofiQ 198 198 fined ' bf i ' I 198— Ilf,lt�, 198 rC A'rrd4b'' f d+eciare, under penalty of perjury, that the , ftrie�crinq is true and correct. August 8 g ♦ Q CX x6tdd 0ln Atcbsta�hjesa, California. �` 1 Signature REQUES FOR CITY COUNCRO.CTION Date 611 gus t- 1c] , 19,85 __.. Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W Thompson, City Administrator Prepared by: James W. Palin , Director , Development Services � p Subject: ZONE CHANGE NO. 84--14 Consistent with Council Policy? [1/y [ ] New Policy or Exceptirr. ,atement of Issue, Reccrnm©ndation,Analysis, Fundinq Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Transmitted for your consideration is Zone Change No. 84-14 , a request to add the service station suffix ( Article 948 ) to the existing base zone of C4 , Highway Commercial . The applicant intends to demolish the existing service station on the sit#, and construct a convenience market combined with a new service stat )n, the SS suffix is required in order to permit the new constr% . :ion . RECOMMENDATION: The Panning Commission and Staff recommend that the City Council approve Zone Change No . 84-14 by the adoption of the attached ordinance and Negative L-iclaration No. 84-28 . Planning Commission action on July 16, 1985 : ON . MOTION BY PORTER AND SECOND BY l. RSKINF., ZONE CHANGE NO. 64-14 AND NEGATIVE DECLARA'k-LON NO. 84-28 WERE Ar-PROVED WITH FINDINGS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Rowe, Schumacher , Livengood, Erskine, Porter , mirjahangir NOES: _. None ABSENT: Winchell ABSTAIN: None FIND114CS FOR APPROVAL: 1 . A cliangIe of zone from C4 , Highway Commercial District , to C4-SS, 'i�tghwa� Commercial District - Service Station , is Consisten - with ti;c General Plan designation of General Commercial and intent and purpose of Article 948 . Z . The •proposed zone change is compatible with surrounding commercial uses. ono.O% ANALYSIS: In July of 19841 applications were filed to rebuild an existing service station with a food mart , detached car wash and to add the zone suffix -SS . The applications were subsequently rejected in that the existing service station location was not in compliance with the locational criteria . The criteria in effect at that time required service stations to be located at the intersection of major and/or primary highways. The service station operator initiated Code Amendment No. 84-21 to ar-end the locational criteria . This Code Amendment to Article 948 hart been approved by the Punning Commission and adopted by the City Council and became effective duly 3 , 1985 . The amendment will permit a service station site to be located at the intersection of a sc;:ondary highway ( Edwards ) and any other highway ( Balsa ) provided that two of the three remaining corners are zoned and general planned commercial . The applicant 's request complies with this new provision in that the northeast corner is within the Westminster Nall and the southwest corner (within Huntington Beach ) is zoned and developed as commercial . A conditional use permit for new service station development is required at this location per the new locational criteria of the code amendment . A new development proposal , Conditional Use Permit No. 84-240, consisting of a convenience market combined with gasoline station and a small detached building for office and restrooms , was approved by the Planning Commission on August 5 , 1985 . ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Development Services pasted draft Negative Declaration No . 84-28 for ten days , and no comment , either verbal or written were received . The staff, in its initial study of the project , has recommended that a negative declaration be issued. Prior to any act ton on Zone Change No . 84-14 , 11. t is necessary for the City Council to review and ace on Negative Declaration No . 84-28. FUNDING SOURCE: Not applicable ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The City Council may const.;er denying Zone Change No. 84--14 which would preclude demolition and reconstruction of a convenience market combined with gasoline station . ATTACHMENTS: 1 . Minutes of July 16 . 1985 Planning Commis©ion Meeting 2 . Staff Reports dated June 18 and July 16 , 1985 3 . Negative Declaration 4 . Ordinance .JWP:SP: kla RCA - August 19 , 1985 -2- ( 3a18d ) ICITY CW li11,/1M"PI/rt�r7� A��CH IINTER•DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION To From ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES SECTION Subject NEGATIVE DECLARATION Date NO. 84-28 June 12 , 1985 Applicant: Shell Oil Company P.Q . Box 4848 Anaheim, Calif . 92801 Request: Reconstruction/modernization of an existing service station to. a new self-serve station, and addition of a 760 sq. ft . Locatione. automotive car wash and an addition of an 800 sq . ft. con- venience market . Southeast corner of Bolsa and Edwards 6502 Bolsa Avenue . Back round r Based on the Stiff's initial study -of this protect a Draft, Negative Declaration •M published in the local newspaper and posted in the Office of the City Clerk Jr a 10-day public review period ending yguMt 26s 1985 nd —. no comets, �� the attached coarrrrents were received, Recoa ndatlon The Enviromental Resources Section recommends that the Plannifig Commission approve Negative Declaration No. finding : that the proposed project w 1 not have a significant adverse a e�ct on the envi ronelent. Mitigatlan Measures �- The attached .mitigating. measures will reduce potential environmental effects re-suTtin9 from the project and are recoamended as conditions of approval . . Respfctfully submi tteds biana Te'ran. 8 faiisiure Ataistant Planner Vic r1 •A of alestminoter tu CIVIV.. (:1 N It 11 11;11111 WI !NMiN!;11 11 110111 IVAIII) W1 !AMINS11 F1, GAI 11'011NIA 11r,11 114 (,001 H98 3311 June 10 , 1985 F!UNTING T ON BEACH �?LVEL(7 RENT SERVICES in 1 1985 Planning Department r o uox ! C') City of Huntington [leach I-Ilintingtin &,acli, CA 92643 P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach , CA 92648 Attention : Susan Pierce , Assistant Planner Gentlemen : Subject: Conditional Use Permit No. 84-24 Southeast Corner of Bolsa Avenue and Edwards Street Thank you for sending us the plan for the proposed service station/carwash/ mini -market to be located at the southeast corner of Bolsa Avenue and Edwards Street in Huntington Beach . After review, we have concluded that the project as proposed will probably have little impact on the Westminster Mall area . However, we agree with you, that the driveways on Edwards Street should be closed off to eliminate a source of potential accidents and alleviate congestion at the intersection , both of which could be aggravated by the increased intensity of the develop- ment, We feel that the use is too intense given the limited area of the property and that the carwash should be eliminated from the plan . That would negate i both the need for the variance and for an exit onto Edwards Street. We appreciate the opportunity of commenting on this proposal . Sincerely yours , COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION f chile 1 6ouvi e'r Adilinistrative Assistant h i • huntington beach development services department STAf f IEPORIE TO: Planning Commission FROM: Development Services DATE: July 16, 1985 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 84--24/CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 84-45/ZONE CHANCE NO. 84--1 „/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 84-28 on .'June .18 , 1985 the Planning Commission continued action on Conditional . Use Permit No. 84-24 , Conditional Exceptioi fro. 84-.45 , Zone .Chang'e - No. 84-14 , and Negative Declaration No. 8 .,'' dtie to ' the hehgth of the agenda . On July 11 , 1985, a revise) 'pli, ; t eub;nitted for a convenience market combined wit-,i }asc'.ir. , .. ,les . The carwash has been deleted . RECOMMENDATION: continue Zone Change No. 84-14 , Negative ' Declaration No. . 84-28, Conditional Use Permit No. 84-24 and Conditional Exception No. 84-45 to .the 'August 5 , 1985 meeting to allow sufficient time for evaluation . ATTACHMENTS: 1 . Staff Report dated June 18 , 1985 with attachments 'JWPzSF,: ;t1a (2839d) r • A•iM�l.7� , huntington beach development services department STAf �.�..i.�...•r...r+.rrr.r�r.rrrt 796M: BeIQe4opr9en?mNr on DATE: June 18 , 1985 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL ' USP PERMIT NO. 84 -24/CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 84--45/ZONE CHANGE NO. 84 -14/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 84-28 APPLICANT: Shell Oil Company DATE ACCEPTED: P. O. Box 4848 June 4 , 1985 Anaheim, CA 92601 MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE : REQUEST: To, construct a convenience August 31 1984 market with, gasoline sales and drive-through car wash , ZONE: C4 , Highway to aermit a reduction of Commercial on-site . parking, to allow stacking credit for GENERAL PLAN: General drive-through lane, and o�' mmercla to change zone from C4 to C4--SS. EXISTING USE: Service Station LOCATION: Southeast corner of Edwards Street and ACREAGE: 0. 52 acres Bolsa Avenue 1: 0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Approv e;; Zone Chang e No. 64-14 and ., Negative Declaration No. 84--28 a`nd recommend adoption- to the City Council based on the findings and outlined.;, in Section 6. 0. Deny Conditional, Use Permit No. 84*-24 and Conditional Exception No. 84-45 based on the findings outlined in Section . 6. 0. GENERAL INFORMATION: _ zone'' Change ,No; 84-14 ';is ''a request to change the zone. from C4 to C4-SS, is_ requir_ed by. -ArEisle ; 94,8., recentily� amended by.�Code Amendment No. � 84-21 . Conditional Use, Permit No . _84-w24 is a, regUesk to . establ•iih` -a convenience 'market 'with gasoline ' sales and ca'r .wash pursuant to . S. 9430. 8 tb'). and 5. 9481.3... Conditional Except! on 'No: -84-45 is : ai - request to 'permit a reduction of on-site parking pursuant to S. 9430. 8. 21a ) . top• - AFM•t7� 3. 0 SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS: Subject Property GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General commercial ZONE: C4 , Highway Commercial LAND USE: Service Station Northeast of Subject Property : (City of Westminster ) GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial ZONE: C2 , General Business LAND USE: Westminster Mall Northwest of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION : Low Density Residential ZONE: Rl , Low Density Residential LAND USE: Single family residences Southw3st of Subject Property : GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial ZONE: C4 , General Commercial LAND USE: Commercial 4. 0 ENVIRONME'NTAL STATUS: Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time , the Department of Development Services posted draft Negative Declaration No. 84-28 for ten days, and no comments , either verbal or -written were received. The staff , in its initial study of the project, has recommended that a negative declaration be issued . Prior to any action on the zone change, conditional use permit aad conditional exception , it is necessary for the Planning Commission to review and act on Negative Declaration No. 84-28 . 5 . 0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS : In July of 19641 applications were filed to rebui.ld . an .existing service station with a food mart and detached car wash and to add the zone suffix -SS. The applications were subsequently- rejected in that 'the existing service station location Iwas not: in compliance with the locationcl criteria in effect at that time requiring a location at the intersection of major and/or primary highways, _d t. a to r 84-21 to The . sez.►ice station operator initiated Cede Amendment � N{ Amen he loc tional cr i r a This Code Amendment to -Ai t Ic"Ye 9,48.. has , been approved by the Planning Ce-mission , and adopted by the "City Council and will , become effective J,• y 31 1985 . The amendment will permit a service station site to be located at -the . interi,ection of a secondary highway (Edwards ) and any other highway (8olsa') provided t:hat two o'f. the three remaining corners are zoned and geheeal Staff Report - 6/18/85 -2- ( 2646d ) 1 , planned commercial . The applicants request complies with this new provision in that the northeast corner is within the Westminster Mall and the southwest corner is within Huntington Beach ; both corners zoned and developed as commercial . A conditional use permit for new service station development is required at this location per the code amendment: . Service station at.andards ( S. 9481 . 4 . 1 ) allow service stations with a car wash attached to the main building. Section 9432 . 8 allows a convenience market, with gasoline sales. S . 9430. 7 allows a car wash where gasoline sale is a significant part of the operation subject to the approval of the use p.Gmit . Eight parking spaces are required for the convenience market ; parking required for 4 drive-through car wash is not specifically addressed in the Code . The applicant has proposed seven on-site spaces ; Conditional Exception No . 84-45 seeks relief from the eighth space requirement . Thzre is adequate space in the car wash -entry to accommodate two spaces , and would be comparable to S. 9791 . 9 . 8 which allowa .,stacking credit for commercial establishments with drive-through windows . Three of the seven on-site parking spaces are adjacent to vacuum arid air/water hoses which minimizes the utility of these services . However , the southernmost vacuum outlet could be eliminated and the afr/wa.ter relocated adjacent to the northernmost space. The remaining five parking spaces would be available for customer and employee use of the market . These five spaces do not satisfy S. 9430 . 8. 2(a ) which requires 8 spaces for all convenience markets combined with gasoline sales . Public- Works Department has informed staff that the exit driveway from , the car wash onto Edwards would not be permitted. This would necessitate rerouting the car wash exit lane and eliminating one or two parking spaces . Rerouting the car wash exit lane may cause a tra M c conflict with automobiles entering the site.. The proposed car *wash exit lane may also create a traffic conflict with . automobiles exiting the car wash and re-entering the site to utilize the vacuum or air/water facilities. By eliminating the car wash use, the required parking for the zonvenience market may be served by a single driveway on Edr:ards Street . 6. 0 RECOMMENDATION : StaEE recommends the Planniny Commission approve Zone Change No: 84 --14 and Negative, „Declaration_.No. 84-28 and deny Condilivnal Use Permit: No. 84 -24 and Cond; t:ional Exception No. 84-45 based on the following f i'ndings. Staff Report 6/18/85 -3- ( 2646d ) !1 0 SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL -sJONL CHANGE NO. 84-14 : 1 . A change of zune from C4 , FIighway Commercial District , to C4 Highway Commercial District Service Station , is consistentWh the General Plan designation of Coneral Commercial and intent and purpose of Article 948 . ? . The proposed zone change is compatible with surrounding commercial) uses on two of the three remaining corners . SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 84-24 ; i 1 . The site layout and design of the proposed use does not properly adapt the proposed structures to streets , driveways and other adjacent structure and uses in a harmonious manner . 2. The location of the vacuum and air/water hoses limits the use of on-site parking spaces required for the convenience market . 3 . Dual egress points from Edwards Street have the potential of creating additional traffic impacts both on and off site. SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 64-45 : 1 . Because of the size, configuration , shape and lack of unique topographic features of the subject property, there does not appear to be exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the land, buiidings or premises Div I that does not apply generally to property or .:lass of uses same diatrict . 2 . Since the subject property can be fully developed within re -,llar established setbacks, such a conditional exception is not necessary for the preservation, and enjoyment of substantial property rights . 3 . Granting of; Conditional rxc2ption No . 04-45 would constitute a special privilege inconsistent: with limitations upon properties in the vicinity and conf•)rming convenience markets with gasoline sales . 7 . 0 ALTERNATIVE ACTION : The Planning Commission may choose to take tha following alternative action : 1 . Continue Conditional Use Permit 84-24 in order to allow the applicant an opportunity to . redesign the proposed facilities in accordance with the City 's codes without resorting to a conditional exception and allow staff an 'opportOnity to develop appropriate conditions . 2 . The Commission -may consider service use in conjunction with a single other use (market or car wash) . `Staff Report 6J18/85 --4- (2646d ) ATTACHMENTS : �j 1 . Area map 2 . Site Plan, floor plans , elevation: 3 . Letter from applicant received April 19, 1985 4 . Negative Declaration No . 84-28 5 . Letter from City of Westminster JWP:O"P: kla i i i I I Staff 'Report - 6/18/85 -5- ( 2546d ) tot cr AL • �� I F a! MW i ' ]� �wN w1 1 raa •'���• I �w + RI tIt RI RI RI RI IR+ y E ..�� � ��� J to r _f�_ � # 1•� i (i; F A� 1� , _.r_ - -�. �^—•-• ter-_ �yl •�wlr�Ty�.. � " I •w'• i « RI RI p R! pl } r, - n AI RI RIica Its ql f. i --al of 1� Rl ski wua.0 �i�1 t. ..cif�L.,.. :'•(( l i.,l w -'• J sr,F-R . - i oil pl f- a1 RI al { n, ' wmo ta 1f t i1Yw1 i. �1 /yiiiai • tr4wr0 tw 1 Ili RI li 1 � M�7ww I. � wN i a � • NI - - al _�•�,- i t ' RI - RI Al y + PI Ii1 p1 : pl C.t • NI�- , 1 rN •{ N , (ri., a Rs :i IW 111111,/d ' 1 A%f CONDITIONAL USE. PEMIT NO. 84-24 CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 84-25 ?.OIJE CHANGE• NG. 8 4—14 o r NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO . 84•-2% 11 NUMINGION SfACit PLANNING DIVISION rl• ., r 1. 11 OV 3p .� •Y• .r..'• f• _'� _ Ju' 1' S 1'11' t 11 ..'� •' ' r �.�..._ . , • 1 1 Lrlt � � •1•♦,rrlATrr•J 1. �� 1 •{.I(.��� .� �irr tr •..•...� . r ,� f• r N•y fi l ..• .t.'f« ', l.r.r' JJ {. It I 1 � --- --I/'l• • - -- ---- - i - ` � .. � � 1 u1 Ell �I� e , '1 J I � 4 1t��7.1 •�•rl.,r I1� .! I r►.♦l w.lhyl v.A •r � h� t r i I . !'] t•r 'l' ( .�.�....n.a►t 1 .1 i t rlru .. rrwl.. ' •ttS��� u(• r— L. w A 1.\. L ,I r•.r wr•w•. • •I1� i Laf 0 " i,.1 M".r. tT"•*w ' • 1 1 i• .. 1 III 1 r•s, 1 • 1 �_• •`�. ._...,..... . ._---1 1. �-__..... .�.. �. � -:'s- .wG�... wit r r,.l4ss- t ' .. •I 11 •6.f r•rr.. f +l.r •/! . .r, i'�' ^ 'r/..1 : ••It•J 1r 1 +•. t .1.r . •.1 . DEVE10�, ON 8E � •,� , i • ,. � • ,, �MEN r SFR � April ly, lyRS ArR S IN fif12RS0'2402 19 1985 P.Q G I t v o I 1 h i n t i n)t t t Bono i t !!I/ll ell)n f l)/1 (;�Ud f•'�U Vi nnn i ig M-pttrt malt t tach, C 200f1 Mn I n tit rve.�t 9?CQ� Huntington Rvac•h , CA 9264H Re: Proposed pro,jec_t for Shell Oil Company, 6502 Aolsa Avenut, and Edwards Street . We are submitting a package for n condiLionnl use permit for demolishing tht existing Shell Oil station nt Holsa Avenue anti Edwards Street . The site will ftcnct.ion by drawing, must of it::. traffic from Bolsa Avenue, drawing; its customers to /t self-service gasoline dispensers. The customer will walk up to .-in on--site convenience ,tore to pay for his gasoline, and also make any necessary pttrvhas,, s at the convenience store , The ter.-site car wash Is an added at t rnt-t Ion to bring t:he custotne r to :;r Rite- to ntirviiase his ':asol ine instead of pning down the street to ,mother service station. The car wash is given to the r.ustomtir free for purchasing his gasoline from ottr stat icin. There are do ,attendants at this car wash, ns it is an vxterlor drive thru car wnsh only. When the customer pnv!; for his gasoline , by asking; the cashit!r, he will hc, given a number which will operate the! czar wash. Just outside the entrance to the car wash is a machine which will activate the car wash by pushing; two numbers given the customer by the cashier . The customer can push the numbers into the machine, and then drive Into the car wash , and stop when the wash is finished. The customer drives out and exits the property. Our plot plan shows stacking space for. 4 cars waiting for a car t.as!- in a space that is completely out of the was of on-site auto circulation. Past experience has shou-n that r.he number of customers that use the car wash works out to be a. small percentage of the total number of customers that will be buying gasoline at our sta-icon . The car wash is tieing offered n.; an added attraction to our customer:: in an effort to increase the sale of -gasoline. This site has ample room for maneuvering; of on-site vehicular trai ,i,� which will coincide with the different functions offered on this site. We has provided 7 on-site parking stalls to accommodate on-site vehicular traffic which dova not purchase gasoline at our station . Past experience with the proposed types of uses has shown that the number of trips generated by such facilities is negligible . Our proposed would instewd make use of the traffic already on existing; streets. In closing, I feel our proposal. will make a good addition to the cotmnet zi.al bujinesses, aB well as nit neatbotic asset to the city of Huntington Beach. There were no other persons to spent; for or against the proposal and the public hearing was closed. Chairman Livengood stated that based on the testimony aLd discussion he would be supporting staff recommendation , Commissioner Schumacher agreed with Chairman Livengoud indicating that the alley is theLe to accommodate traffic when the downtown area is fully developed. A NOTION WAS MADE BY SCHUMACHE:R Atli) SECOND BY LIVENGOOD TO DENY CON))ITIUNAL EXCEPTION NO. 85-24 WI TIi FINDINGS HY viE FOLLOWING VOTl : AYFS : Rowe , Schumacher , Livongood , Frskine , Porter , Mir jahangir NOES : None ABSENT: Winchell ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED FI"DINGS FOR DENIAL CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 85-24 : 1 . Exceptional circumstances do not apply that deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the same zone classification . 2. The grantinq of the conditional exception is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights since the proposed project can be redesigned to eliminate the need for the conditional exception . 3 . The granting of thv conditional exception will. be materially detrimental to public health , safety and welfare and injurious to the conforming land , property, or irprovements in the neighborhood . A MOTION WAS MADE BY SCHUMACHER AND SECOND BY PORTER TO CONTINUE SITE PLAN REVIEW NO. 85-10 TO AUGUST 51 1985 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Rowe , Schumacher , Livengood, Erskine , Porter , Mirjahangir NOES: None ASSENT: Wincbell ABSTAIN: none MOTION PASSED �.. C-6 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 84-24/CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 84 -0/ZONE CHANGE NO. 84-14/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 84-28 Applicant : Shell 01.1 Com a n zone Change No . 84-14 is a request to change the zone from C4 to C"4-SS as required by Article 948 recently amended by Code Amendment No . 84 -21 . Conditional Use Permit No . 84-24 is a request to establish a convenience market with gasoline sales and car wash pursuant to S . 9430. 8 (h ) and S. 9481 . 3 . Conditional Exception No. 84-45 is a request to permit a reductior of on-site parking pursuant to S . 9430. 8 . 2 (a ) . P . C . 7-16-85 -8- ( 2947d ) On June 1B , 1985 the Planning Commission continued action on Conditional Use Permit No . 84--24 , Conditional Exception Vo . 84-45 , "one Change No . 84-14 , and Negative Declaration No , 84-28 due to the length of the agenda . Staff requested that t:hn Planning Commission act: only on the Zone Change and the Negatives Declaration and continue the Conditional Use Permit and the Conditional Exception to the August 5, 1985 Planning Commission Meeting. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED Hogie, representing Shell Oil Company, stated that he would like the Commission to act on the Zone Change and the Negative Declaration but stated if the Commission would prefer to continue all the items that would be fine . There were no other persons to speak for or against_ the proposal and the public 'nearing was closed. Chairman I.ivenyood asked staff if they recommended the Commission take action on the lone Change and the Negative Declaration . Florence Webb of staff stated that: this decision was up to the Commission . A MOTION WAS MADE BY PORTER AND SECOND BY E.'RSKINE O APPROVE NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 84 -28 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Rowe Schumacher Liven good, Erskine Porter Mir 'ahan it NOES: None ABSENT: winchell ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED A MOTION WAS MADE BY PORTER AND SECOND BY ERSKINE TO APPROVE ZONE CHANGE NO. 84-14 WITH FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL DY THE FOLLOWING VOTE : AYES: Rowe , Schumacher , Livengood, Erskine, Porter , Mirjahangir NOES: None ABSENT: WYnchell ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - ZONE CHANGE NO. 84 -14 : 1 . A change of zone from C4 , Highway Commercial District , to C4-SS, Highway Commercial District - Service Station , is consistent with the General Plan designation of General Commercial and Intent and purpose of Article 948 . 2 . The proposed zone change is compatible with surrounding commerc=,al uses on two of the three remaining corners . P.C . 7-16-85 -9- ( 7947d ) A MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY SCHUMACHER TO CONTINUE To CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 84-24/CONDITIONAL EXCEPTIO14 NO. 84--45 TO AUGUST 51 1985 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Rowe , Schumacher , Livengood , Erskine , Porter , Mirjahangir NOES: None ABSENT: Winchell ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED C-7 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 8;-24 Applicant : Dr . Naito and Ted Gregory The request is to permit overnight hospitalization facil4ties in an animal clinic. located at 714 Adams Suites 101 and 102 . Animal clinics are allowed by, right in t;,e C2 zoning district . Overnight care facilities require approval of a conditional Use Permit . The proposed project is exempt Class 1 Section 15301 (a ) from the provisions of the, California Environmental Quality Act . THE PUBLIC HEARING. WAS OPENED Ted Gregory, applicant , spoke in support of the project and h;-jn►lr..ci uu � .In Acoustical Impact Re,.lorL . Chairman lAvengood a eked Mr . Gregory it hc., wti:: supportive of the recommenda t ion in I.he r(-port . Mr . Gr' vgory answore ► the affirmative . Carl McConnell , an, adjacent property owner , stated that he was concerned about the noise from the ` ?nimals . Peter Gagner , an adjacent property owner , was also concerned about the none. There were no other persons to speak for or against the proposal and the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Porter was concerned about an item that was not mentioned in the staff report with regard to 'discardi.ng surgical by-products which could create an undesirable situation . He felt the Commission need to addresn the area of procedure for disposal of veterinary medical wastes . Commissioner Schumacher added that this was also one of her concerns . She stated that most of these facilities have outside dog runs . There was no such indication in Lhis facility. She stated concern about the overnight keeping of animals. Dr . tMaito, the veterinarian for the cliniF, responded that the animals would only be there as long as they are ill or recover from surgery . She stated that the surgical waste would be tre"ated just the same as ether hospitals do . It does not go down the sewer , it is double bagged an placed in the commercial trash container . P I C* 7 -16-85 -10-- ( 2947d ) 3 Pub ish - , August 9 1985 g NOTICE OF PUBLIC REARING ZONE CHANGE 84-14 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing Will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council. Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7 :30 P.M. . or as soon thereafter as possible on Monday the 19th day of August , 1585, for the purpose of considering Zone Change 84-14, a request to change the zone from C4, Highway Commercial, to C4-SS, Highway Commercial-Service Station. Subject site is located at the southeast corner of Edwards Street and Bolsa Avenue (6502 Bolsa Avenue) . A legal description is on file the Development Services Office. The City Council will also be considering Negative ative Declaration 84-28 which assesses the environmental effects of Zone Change 84-14. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or ag:?inst said Zone Change 84-14 and Negative Declaration 84-28. Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 :lain Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648 - (714) 536-5227. Dated : July 31 , 1985 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk NOTICE TO CLERK TO SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING I TEr1_ TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE DATE: PLEASE SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING USING THE ATTACHED LEGAL NOTIrE FOR THE DAY OF �� ='• f 19A l Z�AP' s are attached AP' s will follow No AP' s Initiated by: Planning Commission Planning Department Petition * Appeal Other Adoption of Environmental Status (x) `' - 16. ?tV___ }._b R ON Has City Attorney's Office been YES NO informed of forthcoming public i�- hearing? �7 Refer to ( • � yt' � '�� _ Planning Department - Extension # 11 .�'"?� for additional information. If ap eal , release transmit exact wording to be required in the legal . e. �1i �.l.fti f j' C.�. .��x��. ����7� 1��. �,�.z.a.���---��.:� �Y13 �'s�� � �' ��.i.�lt.(.F4. s•L'41_Ls�..M•f1/.. 'ir� ADJACENT PROPERTY { OWNER'S LIST* { 145-202-052 145-202-054 145-202-058 Wilbur D. Templeton Sidney Alleo Crossley Tumbl.ebrook Homes, Inc. 17312 Rob Roy Cir. 1055 Rose Ave. P.O. Box 3000 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Palm Springs, CA 92262 Newport Beach, CA 92663 145--202-059 145-211•-056 145-2' l -057 Foodmaker, Inc . Robert B. Music Tom V , t;. nshaw P.O. Box 78:3 P.L . Box 2343 13690 Guidenwest St. San Diego, CA 92112 Orange, CA 92669 Westminster, CA 92683 195-063-072 195-063--073 195-063•-074 Mark L. Maurel, Muni Hashinawari William 11. Smith 14951 Trojan Cir. 14952 Trojan Cir. 14942 Trojan Cir. Hlintiraton Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 91-647 ,p w 195-373-010 195-373-018, 019, 020 ►a Stores Shopping Centers Corporate Property Investors Y PP g P P �:C .•�k. �'�.� 6160. Laurel Canyon Blvd, 230 Park Ave. ;North Hollywood, CA 91606 ,New York, ,NY 10169 # Top ;lumber For Each �'�a.r��•s Fae,-os Address Denotes County ST :assessor's Parcel Number