Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Zone Change 84-17 - ND 84-37 - G.P. Building Enterprises - S
t IN Tilt �xv\ Superior Court (you ti twrlr. G�� ,Z �♦ �� � r� hTA'{'F.ttF I'r 1.11'f7)ANIA ��� ,�� r krAW In and fur tttr('rMrnt v of Orange r U t ,�, CA Is 1 1'1 City of Huntington Beach � r � I� I�i+t.:tF;i' ►�„j}LIt'ATIU,h_ r City Cler-k NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ---------- ZONE CASE NO. 84-17 Stair of('ahfnrnia 1 ('i►unty of Mary Elizabeth Herbon That 1 am and at all times h.'rrin mrn4ltin441 'A Ali a 4 ittren Of the united Staten. uvrr the age is( tu+rnh i•ne t,rar.,and that I i f1 am nrit a party tic, rxtr inte.ewtrd to the a1m)%r en►i led m4liet. that I am the Isnncihal rlrrIt of thr pnntrr oif the r� a' Huntinptoli Bench Intl. Rov. � a nrwwitaper of Ventral cirodation, puhli,hevl ut the t'itt td Huntin--ton Beach County of Oranite and whic-h tss pul,40--d f.0 tote diewmir.t-tkin of fatal and intelhernrr A a l,rnerd i harar , .� •'' tier. and which newnpaWr at al! tirrom hcirrin mentn-nnl hA,1 and at:Y has a pima fide outAi-mrturn hat u1 pa' tnR suh,rnher.. �� and which newiltalisr► hats I.ern rrta!ilt.hri. printed and ioih Ii+hid at rrltutar inter%alis in the +aid t'iarah of/lrKRr fist a period exceeding tine era►. Owl the r>,a'trT, of 10101 the annraed :a a itttntrtl rtt{+�, ha• Itrn puhlu,hetil ut the troller and entire iawtor to(+aid neotipalier, and not to am a:pplrtttritt rr. therristd,tin the lutiitwire datew, to oil r Nov. 2.2 a 1984 1 certi!) list drrla►rl tinder lw•n,tlt% -f t1i4+ the (i,r.V,s ing in tntr and nirrrr t1latrrlat Garden Grove 84 Catifitrrin,tills2yt 1ks� t�f Nov. l;, Mary E.� trbrrt titRnat+tier 1� REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION D20ce er 3 1981 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council &ibmittadby: Charles V . Thompson , City Administrato P►aparedby: James W . palin , Director , Developmen.V'Services o Subject: ZONE CHANGE NO. 84- 17/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 84 -37 G. P. BUILDING ENTERPRISES Statement of Issue, Reoommandation, Analysis, Funding Soures, Alternative Actlons, Attachme ts: ' STATEMENT OF ISSUE : Zone Change No. 84 - 17 is a request by G . P. Building Enterprises to rezone 33 ,000 sq . ft . of property located on the south side of Yorktown Avenue approximately 340 feet east of Beach Boulevard from RS (Office professional ) to R3 (medi+im-high Density Residential ) . If approved , the applicant intends to construct a twenty-four unit, three story apartment complex . Staff recommended epprovel and Negative Declaration No. 84 -37 and adoption of Zone Change No . 84 -17 with the addition of a "Q" (Qualified Classification ) designation based on findings and condl - ions ( see attached st3ff report ) for better design control . The Plannis;-n Commission reviewed the request and is recommending rezoning the property to (Q) R2 ( Qualified Medium Density Residential ) with conditions . R ECOMMENDAT I 0 N : Planning Commission. RecoaaendatloD : Approve Zone Change No . 84-17 for rezoning to ( Q) RZ ( qualified -medium Density Residential ) with conditions and findings as outlined under PLANNING COMIMISSION ACTION. Stx£f Recommendation : Staff recommends approval of Zone Change No . 84-17 for rezoning to R3 (medium-high Density Residential ) , staff recommunds the addition of a "Q" (Qualified Classification) designation with conditions and findings as follows : Conditions of the "all : I . The proposed developmant shall be architectural compatible with residential developments adjacent and t easterly of this developsert iu was of building offsets , roof and wall materlals sad colors , window +� insets , and other similar features . OVi �1 0 2 . Variations in building . setbacks and building height Are required to enhance the development . A minimum building offset of 4 ' shall be provided for every 38 ' of building frontage . 3 . A mix of one , two and three bedroom units is recommended within the development . 4 . B31 conies shall be reduced in size and/or recessed to complement the varied building setbacks , and produce a greater variety in building elevations . 5 . Prior to issuance of building permits , the applicant shall file a parcel map consolidating the three existing lots . Said map shalt be recorded prior to final building inspection . 6. Intensified landscaping shall be provided in the setback areas to create a parklike atmosphere compatible with surrounding uses . A landscape plait shall be submitted tc and approved by the Department of Development Services and the Department of Public Works . 7 . An), proposed development shall be subject to review and approval by the Design Review board . 8 . A use C^rmit application along with the Design Review Board ' s action shal ? be submitted to and approved by the Planning Commission for the entire project prior to the issuance of building permits . Findings : 1 . The zone change is consistent with the General flan . Z . A chfinge of zone on the subject property ftum R59 Office Professionai , to R3 , medium-high Density Residential is compatible with surrounding zoning designations . 3 . The "Q" designation will assure that future development will be more compatible with the surrounding properties .and neighborhood . 4 . The subject property is of adequate sire and shape for multiple family residential development . PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION : The Planning Commission held a public Bearing on Zone Change No . 84-17 and Negative Declaration No 84 -37 on October lb , 1984 . ON MOTION BY LIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY EkSlINE , Zt)NE CHANGE NO 84 -17 4 FAILED TO BE APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: .0 AXES : Erskine , Livengood , Mirjahangir 'Q NOES: Hig=ins , Porter , Schumacher, Minchell ASSENT: None ABSTAIN : Nolte ON MOTION UY LIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY ERSKINE , NEGATIVE DECLARATION No 84 -37 WAS APPROVED AND RECOMMENDED FOR ADOPTION BY THE CITY CO NCIL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES : Erskine , Iliggins , Livengood , Mirjahangir , Porter , Schumacher , Winchell NOES: None ABSENT : None. ABSTAIN : None A legal opinion at the time indicated that a second notion to deny was unnecessary and automatic denial of the case occurred due to failure of the first motion . Subsequently , a review of the Planning Commissioner ' s By-Laws was made. It was determined that no application shall be deemed denied without an affirmative action by the Commission . Thus , the Planning Commission held another hearing to reconsider zone Change No 84 - 17 on Aovenber 13 , 1964 . ON MOTION BY LIVENGOOI) AND SECOND BY ERS&INE , :ONE CHANGE NO . 84 -17 FAILED TO BE APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE : AYES: Erskine , Livengood , Mirjahangir NOES : Higgins , Porter , Schumacher ABSENT . Winchell ABSTAIN : None ON MOTION BY HIGGIN'S AND SECOND BY ERShINE , ZONL CHANGE NO 84-17 hAS APPROVED TO BE REZONED TO (Q ) R2 WITH CONDITIONS AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED FOR ADOPTION AY TNI CITY COUNCIL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE : AYES : Erskine , Biggins , Livengood , Porter NOES : Mirjahangir , Schumacher ABSENT : Winchell ABSTAIN : None Conditions of the "V : 1 . The proposed development shall be architectural compatible with residential developments adjacent and easterly of this development in terms of building offsets , roof and wall materials and colors , Window insets , and other similar features . 2 . Variations in Puilding . setbacks and building height are required to enhance the development . 3 . A six of one , two and three bedroom units is recommended within the development . 4 . Balconirfs shall be reduced in site and/or recessed to complement the varied building setbacks , and produce a greater variety of building elevations . ( 1433d) 03- November 20 , 1914 S . Prior to issuance, of building permits , the applicant shall file a parcel map consolidating the three existing lots . Said map shall be recorded prior to final building inspection . 6 . Intensified landscaping shall be provided in the setback areas to create a parklike atmosphere comppatible with qurrounding uses. A landscape plan shall be subaitted to and approved by the Department of Development Services and the Department. of Public Works . 7 . Any proposed development shall be subject to review and approval by the Design Review Board . 8 . A use permit application along with the Design Review Board 's action shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Commission for the entire project prior to the issuance of building permits . Findings : 1 . The zone change is consistent with the General plan . 2 . A change of zone on the subject property from R5, Office Professional , to R2 , Medium Density Residential is compatible with surrounding zoning designations. 3 . The "Q" designation will assure that future development will be more compatible with the surrounding properties and neighborhood . 4 . The subject property is of adequate size and shape for multiple family residential development . ANALYSIS : Zone Change No 54 -17 is a request to change the zoning on a 33 , 000 net square foot ( 43 ,560 ross square feet ) site from RS ( Office-Professional to R3 (Nedium-High Density Residential ) . if approved , the applicant intends to construct a twenty-four unit , three story apartment complex . A conceptual plan of the apartment development was suhmitted with the request . Staff reviewed the request and determined that the site is suitable for multiple-family development . Combining the three existing parcels creates a site adequate in size to accommodate such a development . Medium-Nigh density resident.( & ] is compatible with surrounding land uses . A "Q" ( Qualified Classification ) designation was recommended because the conceptual plan was inconsistent. with City standards . This allows imposition of conditions to assure a high quality development with regard to better land planning techniques , complimentary architecture , landscaping , site layout and design . In addition , Staff recommended that , due to the site location adjacent to a community park , the subsequent development be subject to Design Review Board approval . ( 14334 ) �� 04- November 20 , 1914 t Rezoning the property to ( Q) RZ with conditions is recommended by the Planning Commission . They are concerned about intense development and a bulky building appearance. By rezoning to R2 , a lower density development will occur which will be more compatible with surrounding uses and development . ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time , the. Department of Development Services Posted draft Negative Declaration No. 84 -37 for ten days , and no comments , either verbal or written were received . Staff , in its initial study of the project has reconviended that negative declaration be issued for Zone Change No. 64 - 17. Prior to any action on Zone Change No . 84 -17 , it is necessary for the City Council to review and act an Negative Declaration No. 64 -37 . ALTERNATIVE ACTION : The City Council may deny Zcne Change No. 84 - 27 . Findings for Denial : 1 . A change of zone on the subject properly from R5 (office professional ) t.o K3 (medium-high density residential ) is not compatible with surrounding zoning designations . 2 . The subject property is not of adequate site and shape for multiple-family residential development . 3 . The zone change would be inconsistent with the goals and objectives of the general plan . ATTACHMENTS : 1 . Ordinance for Zone Change No . 84 -17 as recoamended by the Planning Commission . Z . ordinance for Zone Change No 84 -17 s recommended by the Staff . 3. Staff report to Planning Commission dated November 13 , 1984 . JWP :SN :lcp ( 14 33d ) .5• November 10 , 1914 1010 a 11untington beach development services department ff ...�._....R IE PORK TO: Plead►'in(1 C-:.)rMi ,',ion FROM: Ce olop,norit Stirvi (. DATE : NovernU.-r 1 i, 19A4 SLIBJECT : CZtrCCxz, i C!t!t;11 i curl of ZDW. C1i►>N'•F. # 94- 1 7,' NFi DEC . a J4 1 At the Octobor 16, 1984 P.C. ;, r)--t i -an to approve NNE: P84- 17 )ntj N.D. #84-3 l w'd', rn-.id ' ind V!r! r ;) i I Call vot v f hr lee a-it''j i1 id tour nexs,.,.. A local of irlion gat tho terl.e ifldi 'Atl+d that d •,(.)(:( nd rvition to ;;(any wi)'., unneci145ar', a ri,I a,utOR)JtiC tioni,:I of tht' c,jw ocruvrticl duo to, 4 ;1i Jura n# the f i rst rr.it ion, Subst- iuentIV, a rtivit!en •)t the F31 lnni ny Co►rcri - t-Jonerr S oas made. I t .r:a; detr!rrtti neji that ric- Sapp I ic:at ion shaI I bet deer,,(!J don iod wi thou iin of f ir'Tltltiv�., act ion tL',• I vote :.,f fow- or rrr)re Crrn I !;!i i wwr ri. 7 here f ore,. Zone Change No. F•5-17 -3ntl ►Jr-t . ;;r)r, d194- 57 net;(!5 to t'e r-ocon5 i (tt:red in order for an n.ff irtriativq action. tr) be! rlcado , 7t)e fltjin (:c,rc•?rrt of th[! *as th(7i the pro`o,seej bu i I d i ng Lippe ar•inc e wo,. :.Ind nr.: or ch i tec t ura l var i o t ions in torn-1 of bldg. of f -set, r,eiqht; clnd roof I in(". were pre ,entod. Tho t'Iac.vrnont of a qua( lfied ::one wad Ii �;cu':,seJ for t,e_-+, ter je-iigri cant"Cil . The applicant h,at, submitted .a vvv. ',tou a lovat ion of tho conceptu.nl plan ;hotving added roof f i ne var i ,a t i con rind l ancJscap i ng. It i !� : qh l l y tietter 1111,1n t hE► previous elevat ioii, r,ut ;ti I I l ackr, front bu' ldinq I ino of fstrts and varitrd bui Iding ►'eighta . In r?roof toL)':nit!ti'(:' tan(lardr,, it may I)o nectsSriary to rro- di f `j t t i a si I j, f u!) i too rind in(: Il4de ono tic,dr(U)n, tk:? :'ar.c>^�, on-1 thrc!o l:edr't:✓Jrr, I-)v/ out Also, reducin.; !- il(! .vid/ :)r nrn?rudino oalc:r'ni�-�, M11ht }:n necessary. r t,i f f ► s recor►mwrija t i on i t ne �:v k' cats. i ri t fio p rov I ou-5 r opor t , cipprove the z o n a change wi I t h o :j1(1 t ion t)f ,a "��" dor ionation. fiawt,ver, four addition.211 rond i t ion,, hive I:t!e?r addej to t ho "�" des i onat :can i ri order to itch love :Ir: aesthetically ;, Ier, , inq d1ioiloprwnt and ow, that Hemda Lotter *Ith tho surrotindinrl F:nvir<»"?n1 . f2FG )WENDAT I ON- Staff reconv)erids that the iIIannin(I Conn ission Lip prave Zone Changf) No. 84 -17 and Neg. Dec. N.). 84- 37 with f!�e add iIic)n of .a "Q" I Qua I i : Ied C1.7ssi f ication ) des lgnatlon w ith out I ined condi t ion5 and ;ouovviend adept Ion by the C Ity Counci I based on the following f i ndi nqs: C . I b v A•*Mi7 CONDITION'S Of Fitf "n„ 1 . Tho propc►E,..j (jo�.?loimt•r)t r,i►,) f1 I)(! a! r_hitturi�ll ; - iblu wit►t rt!LLbnt r( I den tI',II (t ,1 Inl,fht l► t ': •.fiJjazLef)I and cister- I , of thl'., J(?':fyIor)nk;rlt in ter,tir,, W buildfr►,j off `ifuts , r;a)f :)rid w) ! I mzjtslrNw.-. anci color(, , win(ic)« Ifl`iE}r't5 , 311(.J other Simi ) it foatur(!1. c! I J 1 , f l7 ( J•"�. . ti)rjC�• frlt� ,J l (�} Tlt� i'it'1 �tlt )r 1! r 1!'�lJ l t'ltu t(7 dovtiIof)r)lt?'7t IS min ;,%ri �11 ; I :� � fi''I !' ' t+.11t of f.r ,+li:l I t:i.• :)r v ; ,:•"J for 3FO Of GIJr 10tn fr—ontirr}+" 3. A nl I •( i)) orw o t W;1 Jrt i t rl/"O(' t!(•!I!'C•�►* Un I :i '!1"�+f,.,t N I !h i t hl, :J(-%-v I up!t►lr` t 4. b laic )r; I (!'i Sh.) I I t l! rt! Jui.t.' I (• i ! •(,J 1[ �Tn( /� r r( ,t!cJ C,",, i(•'rt)f)! trlt• •,':Jr '�'<J bu ; IIill:) ,�j'�t)�1�./,'i, )nil j'f .:aLl(.L' a 1f (-,IfoI :cl! 1• ty Ifl ' I J. Pr ;or to n,J1 t :Jini 1 k)f111i +, , thl• :g,c-ii Il,:,,nt J,iji f i ��? ;) �),}I','(,•I Mal) con-, l i sting tt,, t►1to )'nir,1In'. Iota . ia -j r•rfi' ;,.aI t:i• 1 (+(',^)r (1OJ hr• I or tc) f ;n -I I t)'J i 10 i r , i n•*.r•,,,•'t i ,n. 6 . I nt•ens i f i,+,J I ano!-c,)i, i nil ',h,l l I �'( ;'' c`, i' �I (! of t,�i_ . .trei,, tc;. cr' t at: t i n t h ,. R , .,� v a Dark I 1 ho? i)Irr.)sptwr e corI ;)J :,�jrr^Sun I rl(} I arij..i.a, ll } an ;hiiI I Lo '.iUt:l'1; tf(!d tiJ ally iJ(:;): C)Y+? t''j thi) VI+^rirtrr)s3r7t `�� L.'�;r.'uIop► iL?P)t jhr•�,rirQS :1rIU tT10 llf'O Jr tr�..r;t Jf i''J` I li. 'N,jr" • 7. Ary pro;)•7) :;,J do:(! II'p lk-'rot `I ) I i t '' 'ilJtl jc° t tc! "hJ f•+� ,!^11 t;)r�rr�v:31 t'i tf ►' 8. A use G)i?rrn) t y()p I I c.7 i I f)" (31 (,irl(j 1i 1 t ,C t i '')n i►1.) I I !no +'I .?rir; Ifl% 7A1�ii r �. r i + t c:n !or 1 ht 17,.T) c ' I t:•r t t (It:+ I .. :,lJ.�nit� (.'r trl: I I�, r7 t I'''! f t r, .:on•' r'h 11 "jf:+ i C:y.l,• i f,►h1 M I th the l •vri PI iin. 2. A c.!L".J+-)e (cC t .r f ►'��`) l,5, i)ff Icf) ►'r�){t��,ri) ,7T1,� 1 � !(t !l3 , t•!(,d I dOt't i %) le M l th ;fjr'•nundi nrl Z ?n ;r)cg (I i rtn,+,' i r)r, 3. Th(' "Q" its•', ; tlf)r W, I t :',`,tlr ♦? it1a t :ituru (J Ii!(1R1(?Ilt N ; I l UU TTk:)re Cun)i)7t1UIe- h the ;t,rrOu!111inj pr,,,; erIit?; a J )1O hi:x)d 4 Thy' subJt!ct pro;:ur� , i �i ct i(J(!(1:iJt0 '.. i:t' ,irid ,r1ape f,)r- multlp10 family r(t, i dI_,r;'a I (jevv I ciprw,!n t . AITACfVE14T;: 1 . Provo sed revised ordinance. 2. Zone Change 184- 17/Neq. Dec. 84-37 staff report :fated 040ober 16 , 1984. 3. 9nvi %ou nct-ptua I r I or,vi t Inns. datwd Octobor 31 , 19646 •1,. Reconsi derat ion I ' tcor from app I Icanf I s representat Iva. JhIF';SH: I cF IO o , % V huntington beach develop men services department STAf f ....fit E PORI' TOt Planning Coamission FROM: Development Services DATE: Cctober 16 , 1964 SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGL NO. 64-17/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 84-37 APPLICANT: C.P. Building Enterprises DATE ACCEPTED: 7266 Edinger Ave . Ste . H U�ctoEer , 84 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 REQUtST: To permit a change of MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE: zone from R5 (o f f tce Novem er U-." 1 s§ professional ) to R3 (Med. - High density residential LOCATION: Subject property is ZONE: located on the south side R5 (Office Pzp Eeastonal ) of Yorktown Ave . approx . 340 feet east of Beach Blvd. ACREAGE: . 8a Acre GENERAL PLAN: General Co eas r c i al a n d General Open Space EXISTING USES 3-S ng a'Family Residential Units 1 .0 SUGGESTED ACT1ANs Approve Zone Change No . 84-17 and Negative Declaration No. 84-37 with the addition of a "0" (Qualified Classification) designation based on the findings and conditions outlined in Section 7 .0 and recommend adoption by the City Council . 3 .0 GENERAL INF"ORMATIONs Zone Change No. 84-17 is a request to change the zoning on the subject property from R5, office-Professional to R3. Medium-Nigh Density Residential . If approved, the applicant intends to construct a twenty-four unite three story apartment coaplex. L C. d ob �•/Mt1 3,0 SURROVEDING LAND USE, ZONING AND GENBM PLAN DESIGNATIONS: Subject Pro GENERAL PLAN DESXGNATION: General Commercial and General Open Space ZORE: R5 (Office Profeeeional ) LADED USE: Three single family heues North of Sub jec�t Property: GENERAL PLAN DMIGNATION: General Commercial and Low tensity Residential .ONE: C4 (Hwy. Commercial ) and R1 ( mingle family residential ) LAND USE: .:ommercial and residential East of Subject Proper: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Open Space ZONE: 1.,"2 (Community Business) LAND US E s Park South of Subject Proper: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION : General Commercial and General Open Space ZONE: C2 (Community Business ) LAND USE: Pot Cemetery West, of Subject Propert : GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial ZONE% C2 (Conmuni ty Business ) LAND UGE: Pet Cemetery 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time , tha Department of Development Services posted draft Negative Declaration No, 64-37 for tei? dais , and no comments, either vernal or written were received. Staff, In its initial study of the project has zecommended that a negative declaration be issued for Zone Chanje No. 84-17 . Prior to any cctlon on Zone Change No . 84-170 it is necessary for the Planning Commission to review and act on Negative Declaration No. 64-37. 5.0 REDEVELOPMENT STATUS : The rezoning of the subject property which is within the Beach Boulevard Corridor Survey Area is cone.istent with Redevolop"nt Plans . (1257d) staff Report 10-16-Wi 6 .0 ISSUES AND ANALYSISs The su~,ject_ pro,pert} consists of three parcels , each wi th a single family revidence , totalling one gross gore and .33, 000 net square fee t . It approvc: d, the proposed zone change will allow a maxi mu: of 24 dwelling units to be constructed on the subject property. The site is suitable for multiple family dwelling units since it in located on an arterial street, buffered from commercial cases by a pet cemetery to the west and south , and sufficiently separated from less Intense residential cevelopments by a park and arterial street . The site is of adequate size to accommodate a high quality, aetitheti.cally pleasing developpie,it . In order to assure that a► %' proposed development will be of high quality with regard to beti.e:r land planning techniques with maxim-der• use of aesthetically pleasing architecture , landscaping , site layout and design , staff recomme;,ds that a "0" , qualified classification , be added to the proposed change of zone . Thin allows the imposition of certain conditions to further i►►nure that the proposes development will be harmon-=ous wit,. ;.he surrounding area . Staft recomirenas that due to the site location zd jacenc to community park , the subsequent development should Le subject to Deaign Review Board. Zone Change No . 64 -17. can be found zonsistent with the General Plan because of the characteristics of the area - Due to the size of the site (one acre or less in sixes ) , a generel flan :ametiidwent to not necesssarl, . A conceptual plan has been subbitted it conjunction with the zone change which shows a three-story, twenty-four unit apartment complex . Covered parking is �)rovide;i on the first floor with stacked units above . A curacry review of the plans for conformance with the zoning and apartment standards indicates two deficfjncies : the front balconies encroach into the required front setback area ; and the building coverage exceeds 50% of the lot area . An in-depth plan check and �estgn review will occur when a use permit is filed. 7 .0 RECGMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Zone Change No . 84-17 and Negative Declaration No . 84-37 with the additi°,gin of a "0" (Qualified Classification) designation with the outlined conditions and recommend adoption by the City Council based on than following findings : Conditionsof the "0" : 1 . The proposed development shall be architectural compatible with residential developments adjacent and easterly of this development in terms of building offsets , roof and wall mater0la and colors , window insets , and other similar features . it b (12374) Staff liaport 10-16-84 so 40 2 . Yntenstited landscaping, shall be provided in the setback areas to create a Parklike atmosphere compatible with surrounding uses . A landscape plan shall. be submitted to and approved by the Department of Development Services and the Department of Public Works . 3 . My proposed development shall be subject to review and approval by the Design Review Board. 4 . A use permit application along with the [:esign Review Board' s action shall be submitted to And approved by the Planning Comailaston for the entire project prior to the issuance of building permits. Fin dIngs : 1 . The zone change is consistent w: th the General Plan . 2 . A change of scone on the aub jec t property from R5 , Office Professional , to R3 , Medium-fiigh Densit1 Residential is compatible with surrounding zoning designations. 3 . The "G " designation will assure that future development will be more compatible with the surrounding properties and neighborhooc. 4 . The subject F roper t, is of adequate size and shrpe for multiple family residential development . ATTACHMENTS : 1 . Area Map 2 . Negative Ceclaration 3 . Conceptual Site Plan 4 . Cr. ainance JWP :S et r (1257d) -4- Staff Report 10-164W �f :7. ii =- - �•• `t Y A R! PI '�+ I"S a—J ' Pi t t: • 4 �7 .n.. ' L' R2 .� R3 .rim - - ( . ---� ` _ :.-R �`a� I O ate'.^ •;•t-'�+.vf ': �;!+� i �� R1 RI lot R1 • `. 02 R2 A 2 —__R' - O-PD-CD O Y R2 i t s Oct �.� R ' 43 C Ali > P, Cz p2 G-CD — R2 C2 _ C2 CD ID Rr ML0. - z i .: ML �i : —sQ...=-ltJ�7s►HIV It���_'? .•..•' i . ;� �1 'T• ' -ate• ---� "-f. J. S �... -, - �; � -. a _ r '_ A. ,sue �•.........f � .,•, _ S -" ;• ... ' ' ! .•+•`.s ..•••L+. -. f s E �,.• Z C 04 1-7 tom; 1� L e..�.c�w►war UWNOGTOM KA�CH PtAii mwv Ofv1SIQM w CITr oW PROM or = H IIVTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION To From ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES SECTION Substct NEGATIVE DECLARATION Date NO. 84-37 Applicant: Gary D. Potter dba G. P. Building Enterprises, Inc. Renuest: Zone Change R5 to R-3 ( 64-17 ) to construct a 3-story, 24 unit , apartment complex , Location: 950, 8082 and 8092 Yorktown Yorktown and Beach Background based on the Staff's initial study of this project a Draft Negative Declaration was published in the total newspaper and posted in the Office of the City Clerk for a 10-day public review period ending October 15_ 1904 and �x no cmwnts, the attached convents were received. Recomendation The Environmental Resources Section reconTends that the Citz Council approve Negative Declaration No. finding that thiproposid pro ect N i not have a significant adverse exec , on n the envi ror ent. Mitigation Measures X The attached mitigating measures will reduce potential envimmental effects resulting from the project and are recommetrJed as conditions of approval . Respectfully submitted, M Jams R. Barnes Associate Planner ,v- �'.` JRb/dc ,a MrrIGATItac; WASURM 40 -Z- 1. Natural clan and 220V electrical shall be atu k bed in at the lomtior. of clothes dryers. IZ2. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the la:AticTns Of CCX*ing faei i i ties, water heaters, and oentral heating units. Icw volume heads shall be used on all showers . _t.. 4. All building spoils, suadi as unusable lumter, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable shall be disposed of at an offsite facility egtLipp©d to handle there. 4,-*"'5. 71u+e structures on the subject property, whether attached or detail-ed, shall be constructed in ompliance with the state acoustical standards set fares for units that lie within the 60 �, contours of the property. The interior noise L.Nels of all dwelling units shall not exceed the Cali for da insulatiaru standards of 45 cba CNN. .F.Vidence of omplianoe shall consist of submittal of an acoustical analysis report, prepared under the supervision of a person exWiencad in the field of acoustical enc;i veering, with the application for building permit(s) . All measures recmverded to mitigate noise to acceptable levels shall be incorporated into the design of the project. . If lighting is Included in the parking lot and/or recreation area energy efficient lacrps shall be u _sA_-c3 (e.g. high pressure sodium vapor, metal halide) . All outside lighting shall be dire-cted to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties. 7. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered soils englm,,er. 'Mis analysis shall include on-site soil sw.plinq and laboratory testinq of materials to provide detailed rea:rurn ndat ions regarding grading, c hLn deal and fill properties, foundations, retairung walls, streets, and utilities. If foil--type insulation is to be tiled, a fire retardant type shall be installed as approved by the Building Depar.:~.ent. 9. An engineering geologist shall be engagwJ to submit a report indicating the ground surfacm ac xlera tion frrm earth movement for the subject property. kl l structures within this devuelcpw-nt shall be constructed in cxnpLiance with the g-factors as indicated by the geologist's report. Calculaticrm for footings at,d structural members to withstand a::.t.icipated g-factors shall be submitted to the City for review prior to the issuance of building permits. L,,-10'. A plan for silt control for all store runoff fran the property during ccmtruction and during initial operation of t1,e project shall he submitted to the California Regional Water Quali t-1► Control Surd staff for t;wir review prior to the isauwx-e of grading permits. 11 . Information on cqui.trrent or facilities which my generate air pollutants sha11 be submitted to the South Coast Air Quality Manace►'tuent District staff for their review prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occu.ptancy for any use within the building. 12. 13. • CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH IN1W STUDY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACa 1 . BACKGROUND 1 . Applicant Guy D, Potter 2, Address 72t6 Minger Ave• • :cite N H tiV6_ xi eeschl CA 9 ___.-3, Telephone i7I� �• i{ ;Tr�eca t i tin _ 9►50���di9Z aiii� W92 Yocktonnv Y Ftcwn i. S Pro ier.t T i t 1 e/DOSi r•i Ott inn— �ciuvve ii'immtruct a 3-s ory� 4 aapai b. Ua t c! October _15v 1984_. _ _ Ie7t; 11 . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: Rxplanatiun,, Of all "Yes" ano "Maybe" answers are required on attached sheet) . 1 . Physical Environment : Will the project have a significant impact on the physica � environment wit respect to: a) hydrology, b) air quality, c ) geology, d ) flora anr. fauna , e) noise , f) archaeological /historical , Yes Maybe No •X Othr.r 2. Impact of Environment on Pro ect: Will the project be subje.:t to impacts from tte surrounding environment? i .e. , natural environment; manmade environment, Yes Maybe No X 3, Impacts on Public Services : Will the project t,ave a significant impact upon, or re- sult in a need -fora new or altered government service in any of the following areas : fire, police. schools, park, , or other governmental agencies , Yes Maybe NO X 4. Im acts on Traffic/C ;rculation: Nil1 project result in substantial vehicular rwve- ment , or impact surrot,nding circulation system, or increase traffic hazard? Yes _ Maybe X No S. Wit the project result in a substantial alteration or have a negative affect on the existing: land use, population/housing, energy/utilities , natural resources, himon health? Ye,, Maybe No X 6. 0thf-r potential environviental im,►acts tint Iiscuswd above (see attached sheet. ). Ill . OTHER RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES AND/Oft PERSnNS CONTACTED ( ) See Attached ( XX ) Not Appl icable IV. MANDATORY 'r INDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE : 1 . Will project degrade quality of environment' Yes Maybc do X 2. Will project achieve short-term goals to the disadvantage of long- te►M: envi rromr.ent,, goals? Yes Maybe No X 3. Does the project have impacts which ar-? individually limited but cumulatively considerable? Yes �_ Maybe No X 4. Will the project adversely affect human beings either directly or indirectly? Yes Maybe No x V. DETERMINATION ( ) Negative Oeclaration ( XX) Negative i'lec laration Witti ,Mitigation Environmental Impact deport DATE fttober 15, 19A4 SIGNATURE: c INITIAL STUDY II 4 . A potential traffic hazard could exist as vehicles exit the proposed apartment complex on to Yorktown . The Planning Department supports Public Works in requiring the developer to provide a traffic report to determine the safest location for a driveway into the project . .V4 1 . 4 ghat is the present zuninq on the property? R_5 1 . `1 What is the surrounding land use to the: North R-1 and C--4 cei�_entits.l�_=d Comb cial __.______ . South ._C--2 Pet Cemetar ►- East C-2 _ Ci t2,, Park 'Xe9t C-2 Pet Cemetar-,r ., _..._ 1 . 6 If the project is commercial or industrial give a complete description of activities and other pertinent information including but not limited to estimated employment per shift and any potential hazardous materials which may be used , etc . N/A 1 . 7 If tha project is residential , indicate number, types and size of units and associated facilities . 24 units all 2 Bd rm with 2 Baths each vei th 116-1 sq f 1 plun covered 48 parking spacen ineludinr; Handicap Parkinr,, wash A dryer otub • outs Each unit plus laundry rooms, open grans area with Bear B Q S. 1 . 8 if the project is institutional , indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift and maximum occupancy . N/A 1 . 9 Project land area (acr s) J 5F0 a 'acre parking roe acre : Number o spaces 48 16, 44E ground covered 1 . 10 Square feet of building area 2 , 808 living�AzN,�er of floors _ 3 1 . 11 Neivht of tallest structure involved in the project 34 ' 0^ Environmental Setting 2 . 1 drainage grid Flood Control ,11 V1e.vgv describe how on-site drainage will be aceom>.dated . 1 . gutters and downspouts . 2. yard and deck area drainnr 3. concrete gutters eloped to efty curb and gutter line at York-town. •l go arr w s CITY OF MUNTIIMOTOMI SEACH /. DEVEtO►WAMT WAVIiM*QE►ARTMIAIT P.0.a" 1E0 ; 1#MrM111"orsh CA sow (714153041271 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM Fee - $"@-. 00 FOR CZ- USE ONLY ..Gary D. Potter dba C. P. Buildi,n 'rn�r ri�e,� Znc . Date Ann l i ca nt Author ze Agent Received : 1 Project Humber: " D 8 4- 7266 Edinger Av Sui f e i3_ aepartmwnt of origin : Mailino Address (714 ) 34 B-2995 Other Applications or e 1 eh onN Permit Numbers : 1 . George Jue #15 3-091 -02 2 . Sylvia Lefnnn #153-091 --01 3. G .P. Bldg 4 #153-01+1 - 04 "L�_ i ronerty Owner 1 . 1820 N . 'li nta S t .. Lot; Angeles, Crl 2. 7850 Slater Av #97 HuntinF-.tor. Sench, Cri 921547 3. 7266 Edinfrer A'r Suite 11 Huntinr. tn:i Beac; , I:`r,f D�a i 1 i no Addresaelephone 1 . 0 Pro ect information (please attach Plot Plan and submit potograP s of subject property) 1 . 1 Nature of Project: r`.ive complete description of the proposed project . Change Zone "rom R--`-) to 1(- 3 Construct and ,,lain t-,;i n a 3 ntor)- 914 unit apartment 2 Bdrm 2 Bath with 4,11J purkinr apacen cat mound level I . ? Location of Project : (Address , nearest street intersections ) 950 Yorktown, 8082. Yorktown and 0.032 Yorktown Yorktown a_id Beach Blvd 1 . 1 Asses or' s Parcel Humber: 1 �-�-091-02, , 1-10A 40 %%W 410 1-0- . c. Now w;, 11 noise prrAoced by the project coVare with existing noise levels? . Will be the name - A Traffic Approx imately how much traf f is will be generated by the project (check one) 0- 50 vehicular trips per day 50 - 250 vehicular trips per day 250 - 500 vehicular trips per day Y It 5. 1 tripe Der day over 500 vehicular trips per day 3 . 0 Public Services and Facilities; 3 . 1 Water a ) Will the project require installation or replacement of new water lines? ISO _ b) Please estimate the daily volume in gallons required to serve the project. 7536 gallons 157 gallons per day per person x 24 units = 7536 gallon: 1 . 2 Sewer a► Will the project require installation or replacement of new sewer lines? No b) Please indicate the approximate amount of sewage generated from the project. 3120 gnlloh S 130 gallon per day per unit x 24 unitti = 3120 Gallons 3 . 3 Solid Waste a) If the project is industrial , describe the type and amount (pounds/day) of solid waste generated by the project . N/A 4 . n Social A . ) Population Displacement a) Will any residential occupants be displacad by tho project ,activities? NO I IV) M-Per ibe+ briefly the type of buildings or improvewnts to be dr►owliuhed by the project. le storytwo bd:�a wood frame houses, withOtarege approzo age.single each 50 7'sarbe IV ~tom r.r *Mow 2 . 2 Land Form: a) in the site preson` ly graded? }7o,._._ ....� _ __ ._... . .__ b) Indicate the gross cubic yards of gradinq proposed 600 the acres of land to be graded 113 arrc� , thc; aaaurtc earth to be transported on the site Vone , and the amount of earth to be transported off the site None c) what will be the maximum height and qr.-.de of cut or fail after •brad inq is completed? Approx . 3' n" 7 . 3 Soils a ? Type of soils on the subject site? (Subait soils report if available) . Sandy Lo3.-n 2 . 4 Vegetation a) Attach a man indicating the location , type and size of trees located on the site . Indicate below the number , type and size of trees to be removed as a result of the project . All trees removedo however removed trees shall be replaced at a 3 to 1 rutin. 2 . 5 Water Quality a ) Does any portion of the project abut or encroach on beaches . estuaries , bays , tidelands , or inland water areas? No b) Describe how the project will effect any body of water . Will not effect 7 . fi Air nuality a) If the project is industrial , describe and list air pollution sources and quantity and types of pollutants emitted as a result of the project . II/A ? . 7 Noise .al nonrrihr- .any adjacent off- site not.q;v sources ( i .o . , .I t r - jxirt r , i niliiat ry . FroPw,ay- 1 . gone 11) Wh-i I 11-1 1 -;,- w i I 1 Iic• 1)r udurod by the pro)oct. If Avi l l able . Wvasc dive noise levels in decible measurement and t)•pic.2 time distribution when noise w111 be produced. Noise created will be produced by eirery day living* ntyle of tenants. IV r� 5. 0 Mitigating Measures 5 . 1 Are there measures included in the project which may conserve nonrenewable resources (e. g. electricity, qas , water) ? Plea" describe. Constructed per City of Huntington BeUch rind State 4f Calif. F�igery Conserve Coder that shall apply. 5• 2 Are there measures included in the project which would protect or enhance flora and fauna? Plaaee describe . None 5 • 3 Are there measures proposed in the design of the project to reduce noise pollution? Please describe . j Aalcony ' n. iieavy- tree and �3hrub lr�niscapinr net—back area. ilonrj Yorktown te d fror.tol 5 . 4 .Are there measures proposed in the design of the project (e . g. architectural treatment and landsca ing) which have been coordinated with design of the exist ng cosrmunity to minimise visual effect? Please describe . 4 neperate six unit buiidinrn innt-pad of ' :3oi id ?d unit building. 5 . 5 Are there measures proposed in the design of the project to gduce water pollution? Please describe . 5 . 6 Are there measures proposed :,hick would reduce air pollution? lost any Air Pollution Control District equipment required. 5. 7 Are there measures or facilities designed into the project to facilitate resource recovery and/or energy conservation (e . g . solar heating, special insulation , etc . ) ? Please describa . T am considerinf i.nstall.inr u duel pursose water heating and comfort heating BYStem using recirculnti;s,* hot water Which may be connected to future polar installation . 6 . 0 Alternatives 6 . 1 Are there alternatives to the project which may result in a lesser adverse environmental effect? Please explain all project alternatives on an attached sheet. Yo 1 herchy certify; that the information herein is true and accurate to the best of wry knowledge . / w Si setgrp - L =? bate Eiirrd .I w • i 1014m SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP I - 6 - II �tt CIT17 OF p N I�AC• MMAYif M f►D •Nam••b..•.......•.•.•.. M• pr•• r r Ab ! ,w, owe-"* p w HUNTIN(IT(A 1�tdMlR tNltt lA, tlNrttl ARwAI c r u ao • ••t. •�. r rw. rfsl . , BEACH .IfM� *at ' •� owe t,1r •rb.•.•w.•p•r••.� .v••1 .•iN Af f;•q y1,r.•.r•.sr•/,r.w.•.ww•wf 'a."� I ) HANCO' E' COUNTY , CALIFORNIA AW NLTO By Zo%j CA%g • • u �• tv►.. �IUo at As •u,!•,,l�,•�• Nr IN Its 14 IN 0•1.4N of 1• r,u• V.N r• M •J . '! �. J•1 M .•, � M ,1.. lti! q .fs QM II.. fit �' li� Ri RI ! Rl oil Rt rat r R1 C4 al � • . CF I , _ �I 1 ii RI n P ql 1 RI V7%AL- i_�_— I f?i / ZI',Jri F!�� q1 A t71 •r:w• •r qI PI Ft IL R1 4 • o J l._. RI Rl . a, IL Fit fit i. - LP CF-E �_ IF .; _ I _ • RI `�J t l , , fit 1 Rt o J.u�_.. RI ; fit _ .. �; � ;NCB''_' + �--• Jai s l I RI .�� - - MUM . Sim 'SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 2-6- II +ram CITY OF .j HUN'TINGTON BEACH A& ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA �. USE OF PROPERTY MAP Kvtit �.. It AL w i { i ! ► 1 w�yi N w� ; rJ4 . ad, 'A i i C -E F � ��i � • ..fir[--..i.;,: i � � �� i--'--� � ► L . . } --- --- t✓/` '•�� _) ►-yam ,� , - ( , ,• LJ CF-R J%it, Ir _. __�_• 1-ri - _ R. .• • l J ••r+ dr Cl dim � v f v u • •r.fV w V a i Tf 00VUL. 0O #atopV � LAAli v.• ...- Publist Nc�v'a tr 22, M4 NOT:CE OP PUMIC WARIM ZWE CASE NO. 84-17 NdTICE IS HF:+M GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City 00unOil of the City of Huntington Betzh, in ti►e Council Chamtaet of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. , or a„ soon thereafter as possible on Monday the 3rd day of December, 1984, for the pc;rForve of considering Zone Case No. 84-.171 a request to rezone 38,280 sq. ft. of property located on the south side of Yorktown Avenue approximately 340 feat Past of Beach Blvd. from R5 (Office Professional) to R3 (Mediwn-High Density Residential) . The Planning Cor;n,ision has reviewed this request and is rec armending rezoning the property to (0) R2 (Qualif ied-Modiurr, tensity Residential) with conditions. A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Servivvs. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for o; against ;aid Zone Case No. 84-17. Further information may be obtai.%ed frar. the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Ainti .+gton Beach, California 92648 - (714) 536-5227. Dated: November 14, 1984 CITY OF MN3`INMM WACH By: Alicia M. inter-twwth City Cltrk • NOTICE 'j'O CLINK TO SCHEDULE PUBLIC WARING TO: CITY CLlLRK'S GTFICC DATE: PLZASE SCHOULZ A PUBLIC. HEARINC USING THE ATTAC149D LEGAL NOTICE MR THE DAY OF 1 AP's are attached fi AP' s will Follow No AP's Initiated by: Planning Conmission _ Planning Department Petition * Appeal Other Adop�ion of Environmental Status (x) YIDS NO Refer to >a Lao a Planning Department Extension for additional information. * If appeal , please transmit exact; wording to he required in the legal. Publish NOT 'E Of PUBLIL HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public bearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach , in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, huntington Reach , at the hoer of :7 ?_>�j P.M. , or as soon thereafter as 44 possible on .146W -- the �_ ._._ day of ly . for the purpose of considering No. e44 _1 -7j X mow M 4L vjVWM*xVn AY610 p FA 140 4�_e P' n -D - (Me4urv, Hiclk 1he (62) 1Z 2 ir -6M TM 404:51 41e. ,Y► f 6 . o ' ; - A ' 1 interested persons arc- incited to attend said hearing and express their .,pinions for or against said_ - _ op Further infcom.ition may be obtained from the C(fice of the City '. Ierk , 2000 wain Street. r,;nt' ington Beach. California. 926;6 - ( 714) �)U-5227 GATED CITY OF ►f,1'cT1r+G�t�', E•: fly: Alicia `i. Wer.' arch Li ty C: 1Lrk 1 George Jue 1820 N, Vista St Los Angeles, Ca 90046 AP#15 3-091--02 Sylvia S. Letson MO Slater Av #87 j Htg Bch, Ca 92647 G, P B1d6 Ent . Inc 7 266 Edinger lv Ste If Htg Bch, Ca 92647 AP P 5 3-091 -y0 4 -� ?T Alfred F. Barillaro 19542 Beach Blerd Htg Bch, Ca 92648 A p# 15 3-091-05 Beverly A Baler Carl Karcher Ent P 0 Box 4 349 Anaheim, Ca 92803 1 P#15 3-.091.-06 Sppiegel Enterprises • 2050 S Bundy pr Ste225 Loci Angeles; Ca 90025 J AP,�15 3-491_ 7 Yorktown Canter LTD 21182 Beach Blvd Htg Bch, Ca 92647 APN153-051 -14 George A Ellen Howard 8077 rorktown Ar Ntg Hoh, Ca 92646 liei sel D. xartin Jr 8182 Burnham Cir Nt Bch, Ca 92646 A? 153-032r-40 . i Lawrence W . Neumei tit er 8192 Burnham Cir , Htg Bch, Ca 92646 AP#15 3-0 32-41 '+ Raymond L. Hastey Walter W. Johnson ! 8142 Wenlock Cir 8081 Yorktown Av Nt Dch , Ca 92646 Htg Bch, Ca '92640 AP 15 3-0 32-37 9c 42 AP01 53-051-12 Marilyn S. Eol t Hugh R. xac Donald 8132 Wenlock Cir 19471 Worchester Ln + Htg Bch, Ca 92646 fitg Bch, Ca 92646 kP#15 3-0 32-4 3 AP#15 34 34-21 Hiroshi David Na.�ngda Davis S . Gill 25031 Sausalito St ; . 19451 Worchester Ln Laguna Hills , Ca 92653 t • Ht Bch , Ca 92646 AP#153--032-39 < ; AN153-034-20 Hsiung � Chien Win Shang * ' Gus G. Scoufo s 19432 Beach Blvd r 19441 Worchester :,n Fitg Bch, Ca 92646 Mg Bch, Cs 92646 AP#15 3-0 51 -11 AP#15 3-0 34-19 W T Newland Estate r Signal Landmark Prop Inc � Andrew J . Shaffer 17890 Sky Park Blvd 19431 Worchester 1n Irvine , Ca 92714 Htg Bch, Ca 92646 AP,.#933-82-050 t05r 9u 057 r . AP#153- 034-1T . � W ^: Newland Estate 3i&tal. Landmark Prop Alvin J . Weiebrod 17c,90 :, Park Blvd 19421 Worchester Ln Irvine i�2714 ! ,; Htg Bch, Ca 92646 AP,sii9 33-82-06'2,,thru 065 :, A2#15 3--034-17 W 7 Newland Estate C �oseph T Campos Et Al Carl L. Fredericks 9622 Edgewood Ln 8121 Wenlock Cir, Htg Bch, Ca 92640 Htg Bch, Cs 92646 AP#9 38-52-G58 AP11 5 3-032-34 W T Newland Estate t Sullivan Leroy James Howard r. Weiske 19567 Yasile Cir 8131 Wer%l ocCir Htg Bch, Ca 92646 Ht Bch, Ca 92646 AP#9.i8-82--061 AP 153-032-35 Ri h f is W inR 1 ' illm X. Burki tt 19 5 Bch'OL 8141 Wml oc It C r %oaNtg Betio C• 92146 938-82-060 �_+ "#1 %%no12 1A mow - R08ERT 0. MICKELSON PLANNING CONSULTANTS, INC. October 23, 19114 4 The Honorable City Council ra City of Huntington Beach ., „ .► 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 �; Dear Honorable Council Members -. We wish to appeal the decision of the Planning Cotmnis®ion on Zone Change No. 84- 17 which was rendered at their tweeting o ' October 16 , 1984 . This zone change and apartment development project proposed by G. P. Building Enterprises , Inc. , was recommended for approval by the, planning staff , and we believe it will be a definite asset to the City , providing needed housing , and , therefore , merits your approval . Respectfully submitted, ak—C�4-. % M44G 4--�- Robert D. Mickelson Agent cc. G. P. Building Enterprises , Inc. * Gary Pottor 3=2 C MMLLIt AV[NUIC. P. a DOX 2303 DRANDt. C^L11F0 NIA 92"1 • t'fl•l� i79•A��i7 Ro©Ewr D, MICKFL�irlrl P( NNNING C:ONSULTA.14 IS. INC. C. octrlb. 'r ; I , 1 11I;.t P1annimi t1ommis— ion ` O 2 �i u V► +�- 1fv f' City of Flunl in(tt girl 11t:•1r•1" 2000 fin i ll St.l.cot- ilunt i n(1 t On ttr•aoh , CA 'l.'r„I ri � A � 111��,Lti r Comm is!;I till(,1 :, . Wl! 111'r'oby r" vl1.117:; I 1 hill ,'(11— •tililtllt.' !fO . G I - 1 % fol (• i� Bul l d 1 nr1 jilt or F)r 1 ail`:; , f itc . I.. , rl.'cotis tclt'rt'(I i) t '.'( gill' rwxt. rrlootirtcr . We fco1 that. duo, to t 1w Iat('n(':;:; 07, f t .1C` hour , confll:itcin art?sl' rv,ia (llltlt tll• ' l +r(� ) �"`^�� , and .11s(' T(?(rilr'Clln(I the doc- i ion by Ill- 11 1 1 rtct i rtll r'oirill i t; , i l ill . W that Lhe rtllit trill It, i11�F�rl�'.'�' , ,t11 ' �'11 fat 1 ,' 1 , ll'il"1'�: ,'(`il �') t I! 1 no action rat' hl• 1 t li i•l l ho Ivni .rl , its s171F(r:;t, (1 i)y your 1(!CjiI1 t:n(lr,:;01 . F•ut'thl't , `'l' r rl' t than- wo, did not tape. t1111 npprirt.tlrliti. + t; fully, oxI 1 .1i11 thv 1•tr) �oct , mid w(. apologizu- for tliat fart. . hol I .'� ' ) ! 1. thi !; ill .1 1(':i:: them cer11: 1 "t 1` unrll_'r:;t .tnll l n't f + h1 vwr i t !; tit,, !,r(It ., !,o(1 apart - Mont, (levy 1 opri-cit . 7•:1 hil�• r,,.�. •.; i `.1l t 1w : I -o", "'Our 1 I,; t r"."t i nl.- �, c1 t .;(�I1';: � l;( (-„►11! t t t • tl.. . • l 1,, •.,,,,. (�,:l,t 1 �l•1 .��1'l .� 1 �;�` t Il,, t'(' jl(' 111 1 .1 1 1 1111 i 1 (•.111 t t'11.11!'7 1 11, ' i.,, ► 1 , . 1 ::1;'il• r '• 1 It' ! t� ► � I _ � ,•, } 1 !• ! !' ) •.11'" t•l7t t ,`1 . t 17� ' i3 ,•,• 11�1" '! (t. � ,'. � ►} 1 1 .l,• ., l.► t t •' ,,..,, 1 1 !'. 'lh.ir�%' ;r�l.l V�'t'•;' �?,li't'. � 1�1 ','+"11 tl'� 1 �!,` ► a' It�il . i 11.1r'1 INC TON BEACH oswEw SERVICES 11.0. Box 190 flUMM91011 Brach, CA 92648 111111c11I'll 1'll► l' IprI or :"23 CASFELL[ Avr►IIrr r, n 11►rR :-vvi (MAtl►_;r.. r.At.lrUn111A 'l:1r,W1 R:)3•44$+u HnntinBtsn Beach PI810inl Commission P.o. .ax too CALIFORNIA 98M Date: 4Ctober 160 1964 NOTICE OF ACTTroN AFpI i cant: G. P. Building Enterprises Subject: ZONE CHANGE 84-17 Your application was acted upon by the Huntington Beach Planning Comis- sion on , DCtn_ ►ry--6& 1284 and your request was : Withdrawn Approved Approved with Conditions (See Attached) Disapproved XX Continued until Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, the action taken by the Planning Commission is final unless an appeal is filed to the. City Council by you or an interested party . Said appeal must be in writing and must set forth in detail the action and grounds by and upon which the applicant or interested party deems himself aggrieved. Said appeal trust be accompanied by a filing fee of one hundred sixty-five ( $165) dollars and be submitted to t,'te City Clerk 's office within ten (10) days of the date of the Commission' s action. In your east, the last day for filing an appeal and paying the filing fee is lz JU4 . Provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code are such that any appli- cation becomes null and void one year after final approval, unless actual construction has started. Very truly yours, Ms Jas+srs K. aI ri Secretary I�M1 (AS RECOMMENDED BY THE PLA NG COMMISSION) ORDxNA R NO. Al 'N AN ORDINANCE OP T CITY OF ;+UNTI14GTON 919ACH AMENDING THE NUN NGTON MACK WMINAME CODE BY AMENDING SE ION 9061 TO PROVIDE FOR CHANGE OF ZONING PR OFFICE PROFESSIONNL DISTRICT TO ALIFIED ME UK-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT REAL PR ERTY GENERALLY LOCATED Off THE SOUTH S E OF Y KTOWN AVENUE, EAST OF SBACH BOULEVARD (Z NE CA NO. 84-17) WHEREAS, pur nt to state Planning and Zoning Law, the Huntington Beach anning Commission and Huntington Beach City Council have ha se &rate public hearings relative to Zone Case No. 84-17 whe ein b th bodies have carefully considered all in- formation pre ented a said hearings , and after due consideration of the findi gs and re ommendation of the Planning Commission and all evidenc presented o said City Council , the City Council finds that such zone ch ge is proper , and conuistp:nt with the general p an , NOW, HEREFORE, the C ty Council of the City of Huntington Beach d s ordain as follo s : SEC ION 1 . The follows g described real property , generally locate on the south side o Yorktown Avenue , approximately 340 feet a st of Beach Boulevard is hereby changed from R5, "O M CIr Profe sional District" to (0) R2 , "Ounlified Medium-Density Resid ntial District° : Beginning at a point n the northerly boundary of the Southwest quarter f Section 1 , Township 6 South, Range 11 West , an Bernardino Base and Meridian , in the city o Huntington Beach, said point being the nortl-ea t corner of the parcel of land described in the de d from W. C. Newland and Mary J . Newland, his wif to the Union Oil Company of California , da ed December 2 , 1.922, recorded in Book 445, page 3361 of Deeds , records ahb 11/19/84 0302L "A" 1 . V$6 of Orange County, Californi.al thence Eros said point of beginning , westerly along said notthirly boundary 264, feet: thence southerly parallel with the wester!), boundary of the southwest quarter of said Section 1, 165. feet= thence easterly paral- lel with said northerly boundary 264 feet to a point in thie easterly Wundary of the parcel of land descrilDed in said deed , dated December x# 19221 thence northerly along said easterly bound- ary 165 feet to the point of beginning . Excep- ting therefrom all oAl, gas minerals and ether hydrocarbons , below a depth. of 500 feet , without the right of surface entry, as rese►.•ved in in- struments of record . subject to the following limitations , restrictions and conditions : (a) The proposed development shall be architecturally compat- ible with residential developments adjacent and easterly of th1.3 development in terms of building offsets , roof and wall materials and colors, window insets , and other similar features. (b) Variations In building setbacks and building, height are required to enhance, the development. (c) A mix of one , two or three bedroom units is recommended within the development . (d) Balconies shall be reduced in size and/or recesized to complement the varied building setbacks , and produce a greater variety in building elevations . (e) Prior to issuance of building, permits , the applicant shall file a parcel map consolidating the three existing lots . Said map shall be recorded prior to final building inspection. ( f) Intensified landscaping shall be provided in the. setback areas to create a parrk-like atmosphere compatible with aurrounding uses. A landscape plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Department of Development Services and the Department of Public Works. (9 ) Any proposed development shall be subject to review and approval by the Design Review Board. (h) A use perwit application r.long with the Design Review .41 2 . b Board 's action shall. be submitted to and approved by the Planning Comminsion for the entire project prior to th,a issuance of build - ing permits . GECTILM 2 . Section 906L of the Huntington Peach Ordinance Code , District Map 1 (Sectional District Hap 1-6-11) is hereby axond%d to reflect the change contained in this ordinance and on the map attached hereto. The Director of De%,,elopaent Services is hereby directed to prepare and file an amended reap. A copy of said district map, as amended , is available for inspection in the office of the City Clerk. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after its passage. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting theroof held on the day of , 1984 . Mayor ATTEST % APPRO D AS TO FORM: f ` City Clerk ty ttorney REV Ew AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED: City A m n str for rec or Deve opment Services 3 . or i.� ... � .. ... ... ..ww•�.�ri— ...-.... _.-.w.r��.•...•�..... •�'.•w�.r•-......r...w,. .. .�.�.ww..�,w...-•-�Iw�.rY� .•.�.a. I I c N A l 1>/1A 1 1 • 0660 Il N"I'l N( 1"ON 1,11 k I n tl ••1 • 1.11 1•. u )G..I v/r ^.. I HIA �-N1; k 4: 1 ) 1 NTY . 4 : 1. 1FI ) It `11A t7af 14,Er• ►» nVi1 I;A!r ••. 1. ':7.... •,\�,. 1 r l tip 1-4 • .• IY 1" •tt M. 1 •t 1• •• 1. • + .• .-r 1• 1/• ••• S:•• l as �.. ! rr[ PQ !, j 1 R( HI r I i i I,pl I� RI as � r 1 ' -� , C4 +} • I I CI RI ` } al 1•' ( I 1►_ i nt `t �, r. ( ; _ i• i :� -tt i 1 . ! i � i FtI .• �• c. �, if Al I I fit iI II If � 1 " � ` { � •� ; i i•-1 t1 �. I ,l t it I �.,,I 4 ' ( ili � i iil ' r 1 t.. . . i i 1 �•J • I 7_.. ., r { ( 1,, ;t � 1 t• ! F• W, I�j al �I p I I � ' 1 • . � � � • / 1 � tip! N.rr 1,• �> .. fit, fir ; R 1 !1 ''' ' N I f • 41 •'• A,i ZONX CASE NO. a s- a 7