Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Zone Change 88-11 - Use Permit 88-25 - Supplemental EIR 88-1
i i r i i RE LSOL UT T ON NO . 5954 A RE:SOLUT1ON OF 'J"HE, CITY COUNCIL OF THE: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEAC-Hr CAIIFOSNIA, ADOPTING SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 88--1. SEIR 08--1 ) AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT P.EIPORT NO . 8E-1 ( STR 86--11' FOR x THE SPRINGFIELO OIL RECOVERY PROJECT LOCATED ON TWO BLOCKS ON OPPOSITE CORNERS, SOUTHEAST AND n1ORTHWEST , AT THE INTERSECTIOLI OF SPRINGFIELD AVENUE AND e CAr.1FORNIA STREET PXD INCLUDINS 160 ACRES OF SCATTERED WELL OPERATIONS BOUNDED GENERALLY BY FLORIDA STREET 01' k THE EAST AND SEV8NTE1 :4TH STREET 014 IT' WEST, I3F,'I'WEEN YORKTOWN itVENUE ON Tf- NORT11 AND MEMPHI S AVENUE O'V THE SOUTH �1 WHEREAS , the Springfield Oil Recovery Project ' s related entitlements and Suppl.ementa ! Environmental Impact Repcort. No. 88-•1 have been preparea7 and Environmental Impact Repirt No . 86-1 was adopted and certified by the Planning Commission on September 3 , 1986 , .end City Council on October 20 , 1986 ; and The C3ty of Huntington Beach was the lead agency in the preparation of the Supplemental and original Environmental. Impact Reports ; and A: 1 persons end agencies wishing to respond to notice duly given have been heard by the Planning Commission, either through written notice or during a public hearing on October 18 , 1986 , and such responses and comments as were made were duly noted and responded to . All persons and agencies viching to respond to notice duly glVen have been heard by the City Council either through written notice or during a public hearing on November 21 , 1988, and such resoehses and comments as were made were duly noted and Y responded to �7 w� 054 AMNIMS .dM h• r •R' t�04r', •I'lll;REFORE BE IT RESOLVED by LhC C t:y Council L f tl,e City of Huntington peach ay Follows : ,SECTION ] . Irhe City Council does l; '-�reby find that Supplemental Environmental, Impact ReporL No . 88--1 and Environmental Impact Report No . 86-1 have been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Qual. it• y Act and all State and local guidelines thereEore . SEOMN 2 . The '_it:y Council has considered all significant effects detailed in Supplemental Environmental Impact: Report No . 88-1 and Environmental Impact Report No . 66-1 , together with existing and proposed measures to mitigate such significant: effects ( Exhibit A ) . SECT1ON 3 . The City Council further finds that through the implementation of Lhe aforementioned mitigation measures , the majority of the potentially adverse impacts associated with r the Springfield oil Necovery project can be eliminated or i reduced to a level of insignificance . SECTION 4 . The City Council finds that the U�:nef it:s accruing to the rity, both economically and socially , by virtue of the consolidation of existing oil. producing operations to i single site, abandonment to ,nodern standards of many existing welts and replacement: to modern standards of existi.ng tanks override the Qnmitigata5le effects detailed in Supplemental t Environmental Impact Report No . 88-1 ant.' Environmental Impact � Mport No . 66-1 and the attached statement of overriding ., ' considerations (Exhibit 8) . ' C 5954 ! .i MUi 4 o N ! SECTION 5 . The City Cout7Cil. of Lhe Ci L� of Hunti►igLon Beach does here;-;► adapt and certify as adequat►' supplemental Environmental. impact Repoi L No . 88--1 and adopt and recertify a;; adequate Environmental Impact Report: No . 86-1 . PI,SCED AND ADOPTrD by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 21st I day of _ _ November , 1988 . 'I Mayor ATTEST : APPROVED AS TO FORM : City Clerk ji-/j- f,� City Attorney 1*:, sw\C, C�r i-, REVIEWED AND APPROVED : INITIATED AND APPROVED : Cit AUministrdWor Acting'—El rector , Cummunity Development 5954 3- r {mob lid" M 0 Ts IN -..6UP.EORT-01 PY " "oE= BY M GITI CODHCIL Qi, M Gxz1 �' E MINaTON ZZAM IA() TBL 1121,9T kZF0 PLrRQI.FtTli CORPORATI t s�{2"Ca,r-ALMORMIA 5CH Mo . Afio49917 AS . MM BI- Q.�COMC7.L 1 . 7'INDINGS ltWARDING 4miriCANT 07 CTS TEAT 3 CANNOT rUSIBLI BE MITIGA►M TO A IJML OF { INSIGNIFICANC'R f 1 . 1 Aesthetics 3 1 . 2 Risk of Upset/Health and Safety 4 1 . 3 Seismic Impacts 5 2. POTMIAL ZMRON.MMAL" ZMCTS WNICN ,ARE g YIQT SIGIIIf'ICAn oR wRTGR CAN BE KITIGA►TED TO A am or Insionif'ICANCz 2 . 1 Topography, Soils and Geology A 2 .2 Hydrology, Drainage and Wster Quality 10 2 .3 Biological Resources 13 2. 4 Arch►elogical/Paleontologic&l Resources 13 2. 5 Land Va e, Zoning and General Plan 14 2. 6 Light and Glace 22 2. 7 Tzattic eaad Circulation 22 2. 6 Air Quality and Odor& 25 2 .9 ftise 27 2 . 10 limit of upset/Geatth and Safety 29 2 . 11 ftblia Services and Utilities 33 r,z;• 2.12 wwrgy Coalervation 37 1 2 .13 growth laftcing Impacts 31 r. 2 . 14 Cumulative Impacts 38 3 . FINDINGS RWAIWIHC ALTE"ATIVES 42 � 3 . 1 No Project Alternative 42 i 3 . 2 A2duced isitensity Alternative 43 3 . 3 More Iutense Arilling Program 44 3 . 4 Abandonment of All Oil production Sites 45 3 . 5 Alternative Sites : Parcel 1 46 3 . 6 Parcel 1 Development Only 47 3 . 7 Alternative Site6 : Parcel 2 48 3 . 8 Alternative Siite& : parcel 3 49 3. 9 Alternative Sites : ?arcel 4 50 R. 10 Medium Density ResiAential Project 51 4 . ADDITIONAL TIMPINGS 54 4 . 1 rindinge Relating to Project 54 Consistency With the Rousint Zlement : To le Added to Section 2 . 5 .2 , of the CECA FindinSs 4.2 Add it icnal Findings Relating to 54 Alternatives Pxopoaed by the Cbambere Grw;p s Inc . on Behalf of the Concerned Citizena of Huntington Beach T ' . C '1 $EQ,�$1�I YIti 1G *lT"-TVA= R T ra$ WS 01 - SIR 26040212 The state auidealfneaee ("eluidollnes") promulgated pursuant to the Californian Environmental Quality Act ("CMA" ) provide &a follows: ' (at) No public agency shall *pprove or carry out a project for which an Z.'.E has baen completed which identifies one or more significant envirotunental effects of they project unless the public agency eaaken one or more written bindings for each of those significant effects, acco"anied by a brief explanation of tt.es rationale for each finding . The possible findingr sra: (1) Changes or a its::ations haver been required in, or incorpor&ted into, the project which avoid or substantiaXiv lessen the significant envirtdvoentsl effects as ident1fie:d In the final Eitt. [Thidi...f3 i SL A.1. .,.Ja , rafsr.rad�� �! diva (11 10 ) (2) luch changes or alterations are within the � responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the Minding. Such changes have boon adopted by such other agency or con and should be edopted by such ether agency. 11hig f.nd1bg Shall ,.hai- ghflrx. (3) Epercific Occoonic, social# or other considerations rrhe infeasible the �t teitfgation seissurom or proj*ct alteirnativea identified in tka final all. (guidelines Exhibit A 1. .• .". ..y M ` 5 1, (Tail- indng . J_bq referred to -OR The tnvi,ronmental Impact Report ( •EYR") oar the oil recovery project ( "project" ) r9oposed by Anquas ` Patroltum corporation ( "Project !Applicant" ) identifies significant effects on the unvironment which may occur as a resul� of the Project , Sort of this AttjkAme nt idenLifiab the significant envirQnmantal effects of the ,. Project which cannot feasibly be s<itigated to a :i% rvel of significance. figiq~Lian_ .,.$ $ata forth potential onv►ironmentai affects of the Project which are not si.gni;i:icent because of the design of the project or which can feasibly be mitigated ;o a level of insignificance . gectia" summariues the alternatives discussed In tho L"Iit . The findings set forth in each section are ` supported by facts established in the administrative record of the Project. 26 lHYi�'74'r{ii'•J,V,• .f.0i. r •Y''.t-0W�,'lil . . , ', f N •S 41. JrF.A IHLsY h M rtG&TS12 Ta LML or �4�.�FI�'� .9. They City has determined that D'IR Mitigation measures and proposals included as part of the Project will result in a substantial mitigation of the following effects, but that these effects cannot feasibly be mitigated to a level of insignificance . 1- 1. lSOMMUGS 1 . 1 . 1 Significant Effect : The neighborhood surroi -ding the Project Site consists of medium 66nnity resit' ati&I uses, predominantly in small (8-10 unit) developments and single family residences . Views of the Project Site from ad j acont residences will consist of the screening block wall and landscaping. During the initial drilling phases, drill rigs will be visible. Durinq the production and injection phases, temporary drill Brigs will be used periodically for maintenance and will be visible from adjacent residents. Tanks will be visible above the Mall . Zini2ing= The City hereby makes findings (1) and (1) rac . .Burro ..#nd i� The following measures will result in a substantial reduction of the adverse impacts of the identified stgni f icant effect . (a) The Project shall comply with the landscaping requirements of Chapter 15 . 22 o! the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. (b) Al2 trees shall be a mini --,n of 24-inch, box type, and spaced so more thaw 20 feet on center . (c) Landscaping and the construction of masonry walls and street ieaproveeaants shall occur concurrent with excavation and construction. (d) deli service rags shall be operated no more then 46 days per rear, and no score than 4 well service rigs may, be on the site at any one time. These service rigs shall not exceed 120 fhet In height. (e) Drilling derricks shall not eatceed 1.65 feat J-n height. Upon cwVletion of initial drilling of Injection wW producer wells, all drilling ,rigs shall be rowed from the site. 3. t ti I 1 , (f) They enclosure of both parcels of the Project Site will provide the most di rout mitigation of visual i irapactu . Surrounding the dx;1.1 site with an acoustical wall will provide a more aesthdkxc viewshed . � (g) During the initial drilling phases , when shill rigs are visible, the drill site steal] be surrounded by an acoustical wall and portions of the rig will be acoustically wrapped . (h) The Fmcts in Support of Finding 2 . 6 , addressing light and glare, hereby are incorporated by reference . ( i) The Project requires the drilling of 30 to 45 wells from the drill site . Theses wells shall be located within the fenced and landscaped drill site and the wells Shall be concealed from view. (j ) The topography of the Facility Site will be Substantially lowered to reduce the height of the storage f tanks . (k) These mitigation measures included, within the Project Design and imposed by the Use Permit will substantially reduce the aesthetic impacts of the Piro j ect; . Nonetheless, the Project will result in a charge: in the vlows from adjacent residences, because of tho addition of a 30-foot sound barrier stall and a 165-foot drilling derrick. This is an unavoidable adverse impact of the Project . 1. 2 R18ii OF t 29=/H&JH AND ffAFZTV 1. 2. 1 912niticant Zgf=: Under a worst case scenario, assuming thst all oil tanks are full and the tanks are set out in art open field without surrounding perimeter walls , there is a 'taro" (defined La 'the standard methodology for risk assissment as 1 : 10,000 to 1 :1,000,000) chance that Bra oil tank fire er,+uld result in radiant host affecting the area outside of the imadiate Proja:ct Bite. Tao City hereby Makers findings (2) at- F�actg uggart Af ir9LJZ, au: The f of lowi np wasutes will result in tb* hubstantial reduction of t:ae 44verse iWacts of the identified significant affect: (4) Oil hsadling fa Mities will be lowered to sir: feet below 00 level of thig surrounding streets , This ftelarep couplers with the eight-foot perinaatet Mail, will w i I' i 1, 1 'W1 very significantly reduce any 1 radiant, host hazard footprint , " which is calc:u%sltea fixing no containment bt all . (b) ail wili be shipped on a continuous bani.s , Therof.ore, only a minimal anmunt of oi,% will be required be held in the tanks . only three on-site crude oil .,nks are permitted, and these tanks shall never be completely full at once . The small amount of oil on site will reduce the possibility of oil-related f i ren (c) Prior to than f euvance of my building permit, a prowliminary emoroarcr action plan (ZAP) shall be prepared anei submitted. A completed We based on as-built plans , shall be co aple*pd and submitted prior to the start of oil production operations . The ZAP shall include employee training and periodic practice, how spillage onto streets from the Project site would be handled, the safe handling of any chemicals and/or hazardous materials, and shall require full knowledge of all systems and emergency equipsent. A copy shall be on file at tho Fire Mpartment ' and updated emery five years . In addition, a Spill. Prevention and Control and Countermeasures (OPC^) plan in compliance with City rarguirements for handling of spills, etc . , not otherwise covered in the RAP shall be completed and filed with the City prior to the start of oil I Production operations 1 (0) The Pacts in Support of finding 2 . 22 .20 relating to fire prevent ion/protecti.on, hereby aro incorporated by reference. (s) Although the likelihood of a fire with a radiant beat footprint large enough to affect residences In � extreow1r, low, if it did occur, the Impacts would be significant. Therefore, it is considere,4 a significant unavoidable impact. 1 1 .2.2 $AS" laawt: !ail=: If ari earthquake of ![ 8. 0 or gcoater on the Richter Scale occurs with its epicenter in i the Project Area, structures in }.-. Project 11ms Including tanks and walls of the Project facilities, would he daoaagcd. � qgs The City hereby ma►kear findings (1) and M6 r, r 1r p It grLL in .1u1t S a...-a Zin I Tho fo1?nw,i,n i Meaauzes will result An a substantial reduction of the adverse impacts of the identified significant t effect . (a) Project engineering will prevent the well cellars from betting damaged , even in an M €s earthqurke . (b) Oil will be snipped on a continuous basiar so that all of the teaks in the oil storage area will never by full l at the aamrs tire. Only three on-site crude oil tanks are permitted and these tames shalt never be compleytnly full at once , 'he oil. storage area is located six feet below grade, and they %rea is surrounded by reinforced concrete retaining wells . The volume of this depreessod rataininq basin exceeds the Uniform Fare Code, and Division of Oil and Bat requirements , by a factor of 2 . Even if the retaining wall is ruptured, the retaining area would !gold oil released by any tanks which burst or overturn, (c) The Facility would shut down under a "fail-safe" a stem, as soon as the power went off during a major or earthquake. No emergency situations would to created requiring immediate attention by, or an augmentation of, public safety peratsnnel . I (d) Unginoeering soils analysis and fault line lnvesti'nations were perforated to determine if near surface faulti.nj is present within the Drill Facility Site Areas . The resultant study concluded that no faults or related fracture sores were observed in the trench exposures . Accordingly, an active fault line is not known to he prevent within the trench limits . The fault line rove. 1,Agation report show that, no faults were found. (a) The Project will eliminate 22 existing wells and 7 tank batt*rires . Bone of :,axe batteries has morn than rudimentary fire-fighting equipment, and they wells all have some leaks around the stuffing boxes . Both the existing walls and tank batteries are locates in close proximity to residences; unlike the Project, they are not completely surrounded by block walls, with wells located underground in trench cellars. The Project 's eleesign will ensure that oil looks resulting from a major earthquake would not escape beyonh the confines otc the Project, while existing wells and tank battesios create numerous rinks of leakage and other potential hazards in the event of a major earthquake. In addition, all existing wells are conelected to their tank batteries by maws of buried pipelines, iia►ny of thetas lines are old, and their exact locations are not known. Approximately 18,000 feet of d. t �II • ` 1 t' 1i J - I 1 J 1 pfpeline will be abiind�nQd by the which will replace bar piprl, ina with pipelines tilat are in c: ).nAuit.s under the coiner of Springfield Avenue end 4uritington Street or hang on thy* colier Malin, wh,exe leafs can be found and rep&ired uickly , This will result in a signiticant reduction in the impacts of rvptures and leaks in the event of a major earthquekf., . fl, Although the above messurea would prevent the creation of an e.sezgenwy situation daring an earthquake of H g or greater , no known engineering at other mit:xgstio:, measures could avoid damage to - the Vr_ci :ity if such a major ezirtyquake occurred. In conjuncti n with 4arrage that would occur to the surrounding area , this is a Significant;icrant unavoidable -regent of the Project . i F� y 1 l C 7 �a n n TM r� Liu. 1.Z ll The City hav dot-ermined that tnp fnl), ;vinq affect:a will sitrt be significant:, for the rea n:. st;ete:d be lov , 2 . 1 '� �. !?1 t l TD Wale2o, 2 . 1. 1 tentia3 Development of the Project will alter the existing topography of. the Drill giz,e and Facility Site . The existing surface, t,,f thr. rizound on the Vrill Site will be graded and racompat tc%'. to vuhstentially fullow the ccntours of the sbratt:ing streets . Excavation t.' a depth of spiroxinaat,ely 11 feet vi l ] be required to Permit conatri',Ictiun of three subtUrfare W911 cellars . 'Tt+.e toVogrephy of the Facility Site -ill be lowered approximately- two fret beicw the street alevotionE, can the south and west and s x feet w-elcw the etree+t: nlevritl one on the northeast rornar , in order to reduce the height of the storage tanks. The City hereby makes 'finding (1) . F,sCIOLLO Auu ®f Fiandinopu I (am) Ttae Project Site currently consists c,f two parcels . which sre vacant: except for existing oil production facilities and well pumps ,. The vacant areas of thfo parcels are covery d with fi lUer piles from prior construction activity. SacauvB the osistinq topography of the Projoct Site is disturbed andt covered with piles of M dim, the effects of grading are not significant . (b) The ourfaca can tee restored at the end of the Project ' s life apart. Prior to termination of the coil operation, a plan shall be submitted for the rovliew and opproval of the Fire Depar::ment and Development Services Departmernt # shewing how rt±a Site will bn abandoned and restored to i.ta closest ratu,.al state. (c) All, loose upper sails within the foundation areas for proc*ss equipwnt on tO%e Facility Site shall be rowv*d r r.d replace era r^vupected fill . Foundation areas for the well ce23.4rrs on he Drill. Bites shill be ovaraxcavated a nilnirwm of two feet vet A-ica 1 ly wad three feet harizontai:.y and replaced bl, compaeterd fill. Superfic:sl fills ne4r the cellars ihoilld be rowv3d and replacsd as compsat ed fill . s. ;Iry ,41 fsubs.i klencf: h&.5 2 0 C r I,e L1 in x.le Hun, 1 In", 6"! w1th A triaJor a 0 b'b I d e 1.1 P4 1' 0., 'ky V,0 t)(J J;)..,e t`.' j I y,6 9 1., o I i m i tz ii of �.h R,L)n t i V'0� 7"0: i i tho A a 3 L B u V1 St 44 '%: I ')n 10 C.�t J M'i6,ztj1~1.,,, n a al)* set if�11 0 U 1 e V a - L-Jt!VCV. iit A is U 11 t 0 - C � 2 f;� et fai t.�b i ;-)d fl�w. lthrut%rili 19h6 . .the cu c rent &-t er b q e r it e c.", n.1, Yip r Y.,e r S pp 4 ox I mu t.e 1,Y M"'.ko6 IS( ks) Several reporta i nd i ca t:e t h a t +JkP e of subs ha-s decreaspo since JA ood i ng 011. produci ng 4unp_s wfi!,-, ' '.i 4' .',. in 19 59 . The Divi.. kon of Oil reports that the �,.ihximum recorded rate tr.. oubsidence wa s . J.N [:�►ot per year from 1955 to 1966 , 17 fron, 1968 to 1971, jut decroazod to 0 . 05 t per year (b) Fxpexience in other- o i I fields , .3 v c-'i as "ilmington , ahotto that. rppresauri' xatir�n of the oil pro4ucirt(j zones throurill., -oratrr In4ection has cau3e:d rnaticad retes of isubsiBence &.nd often has completely halted Fubsilence and even a;,used ft0o'1 rebound . (c) Based on the studias by the Division of Oil and Gas and experieuce in Wilmington, cited above ,, the implamentation of the Project will not increase subsidence, and should reduce the rate of subtidence , in the Project Azea . 2. 1 . 3 JPgtsj3tiAJ_. Elfr. In three cases , oil fielel operationc or other fluid injection activities have been documented AS relating to induced se-1hamic movements . In the ft Lmi ngton Field, California, sever,%I small , subsidence--induced earthquakes occurrad. In the U.S . Rocky Hounta-4in Arsenal, Colutado, a meries of earthquakes nas caused tr y tl"Id emplacem,�nt in a iijuid waste dihposal project: . In an oil reservoir at Rangely Field, Colorado, "ater injection operations resulted in induced seismic movements . rj.Udlj=•: The City hereby makes finding ( 1) . rarots In Support at-MILad'aam : (a) Sons of the above situations In likely to occur at the proposed site . The Project is a water injection 9 . arnr 4e projec!, , which will not causto fijb5idence . The. Facts in Suppott of ]PInlino; herz!by As!:'e inL-Orpo rated by reference . (b) 71re Rocky. Mrpa n t a in Arweria I and Itange ly P3rth,7uakvs i.ry Cuiozado ccc,-urtetl. 4-n har-I buittle rock . This rock to geologically diftarent- farom the YWAng sediments of the Lon Angelo)': Wealn . Therefore this Bats does not apply to th,, proi-6,:A . (c) Micro--earthqj ' .kp. nonitorirv; system3 , designed to ,tocurately locat.e.i sir ) , shallow eorthquake:ib that might be geperated by oil operAtions . have to-:gin in operation about , I years in the vicinity of Inglewood arse' !?i1mington oil fields: . No earthquakes have been located in either fiele. or in nearby fields , thet would indi.cate oil operations to N cavis3tive factor . 2, 2 2 2 . I Stormwater runoff wi .Ll be in% zessed because the -v-viiig permeable lant cur,," ,ce will, be decreased by app,- ,,i&tely three ai,.--res of !and , resulting frow the pi,. J. iiq of tho?, Project; Site with asphalt , The C ty he::aby makes finding (a) The increase in storm weter from paving the Project Site will not have negative impccts on the existing ator-in drain system beclkuse the Project has been designed to utilize all on-rite 8torin water runoff for water injection plarr.oses . (b) The construction of neis h3li-section streets with concrete curb and qsAter will 41. 1eviate ths present wr4ter pon(ling problems aloikg the City right-of-way. (c) Surface drainage, including storm water, on the Drill Site still be diverted to catch basins , then by gravity flow Y13 underground pipeline across the street to the Facility Site , The water will be collected in sand interceptot No. I and then pumped into the water processing area , filtered and nixed with the production brine and injected into the oil bearing some as part of the water flood , The interior of the Facility Site will be partiAlly paved with esphalt over a rock bass and the remining portion will be paved with crushed rock. The 10. 9 ,in F. , uJlk majority of sternmator and surfbcet drainage! will inf i ltrate into the soi 1 throuyh the e:rushad rick. Jkny remaining atormw*L-tar and surface drainage will r*,e collected in catch basins , di-�ertod 1:� they S*nL! i r,' . cnaptoi:s And then follaw the same process eta watt.r t > val the Dciil Site . (d) In the event of a power failure d.uri .+,,, a 100-year Atorm, an emergency +waves could be opened on the Facility Site and all story mater could be diroocted via gravity flow pipelines to Well f'ellars A and B . Whav the cellars are h Yki+� l.�ly f 'l.APf water. will Flo-o tri a t:hrfte-st�t�p clarifier, then, if necessary, via pipeline to the storm drain In Delaw&r.o Street . Cellars A and a have bcsen specifically engineered to pesrfor-o as additional clarifiers for this wmrgaenc Y use . 2 • 2 . 2 f t C rAt i iaL Zffj : The original SIR !stated that produced water or make-tip water would bee released to the sanitary mower system. This is no longer the come . Injeecti un wa�tsr wilt not releare to the sans tskry rower system. The C ty heYreb makes finding ( 1) . �act;s in Sunoort o�_�`��I1�L�d� (a) ,All va' i r used for injectio,. into the underground oil rueseexvoirs will be obtained from the following sources ; storm water runoff . prod-;reed water from they production swells ; and make-up brine water (water to Initially fill the underground) purchased from Cbeevron U. S .A. At present Chevron U.S .A. is treating and releasing the makes-tip )brine water into the s4 Atary sewer uye:tem. Use of the brine w&�teer for inject{o,., purposes will initially reduce the existing lord on the sanitary sewer system by api roximately 30, 000 barrels pez dale. (b) All brine produced with the oil will normally be cleaned by circulation through sand filters and settling tanks and will then be reinjected into the formations . (c) lr the event of a complete electrical failure , all production weellt will go down, and thorn will be no producod grater . The flow of make-up water will be etnppeed at the source. The water filtration system will Anc..udee reserve capacity to allow for coi,tinueed operation during equipment waintetnance or repair . If a longer tiow period is n►m4ed to make repairs or to replace eequip ont, stake-up water will be reduced and/or a partial shutdown of high water-cut production wells will be implemented. 1 11. I ' s� P 147 2 . 2 . 3 i,e cz The drilling n the wells for they Project will Anvoive penetrating Moth shallow and deep groundwatar acquirerx to gain access to oil -baeari,►g iayrers lheeIow, rQaulti.ng in potential adverse effects On groundwater . J, �xl : The City hereby makes f i cif ing (1) . They following messures will Mitigate the identified Impact to a level of insic:ni ranee , (aa) They water found in the nhallow and deep groundwater amcquiteers is , for the mast part , brackish. Potable water has been extracted trom acquife3rss in the Huntington Beach aver , although usualty, only in ari-as east of the Newport-Inglewood Fault . The Project Site is west of the fault and is . in tact, located between two bianchees of the f a ult . The injection of water and extraction of oil in the oil-bearing strata will not havi as oigniL icant effect on the quality of groundwater becausr- the water curz*ently is not utab;.e: for either do"atic c,r industriazl uses . ('b) State Division of Oil and Gas Regulations require that the base of all fresh water sands that are penetrated � must be protected from salt crater invasion from below by i cmaenti►ny .. The Division of nil and Gas will require that water teeny ,• be perfor"d to erasures that prof- er seals were formed. % Use Perm;.t requires that pipe string ce ranting t14,-•ou9h fresh water-bearing sa kid,i shall be implemented to prevent saltwater intrusion into the acquifers . (c) [luring drilling aperstions , the drilling fluid which is circulated in the well boaard to remove cuttings forms z naombraaane around than bore hole wall and inhiibita water infiltration Into the formatloas which have been penetrated . The area of water 3.n iltration from the drilling mud is usually no more than a tow feet in diameter . 2 . 2 . 4 Patent ial_X Q; Make-up water will be transported to that pzti ject site through ae pipeline . if the pipeline ruptured, brine come] be released . Pi ines s The City hereby makes finding (1) . facts ,,.in Auppat,...W Zindlm: The fallowing measures will mitigate the Identified Impact to a level or i.x►slgn3fiCanret. 12 . �Lt ; ti,;' , �` Y. fV A h y' The make--asp water Pipeline will be buried agproaimstely 30 inchou below the street surface measured from the top of the pi.p3 . The pipeline In above the groundwater surface, and will not enccunter any surf acc water . (b) The pipeli.ns wili be monitored with automatic shutdown pressure sensors to teat any sudden pressure drop Will trigS7er an alayrm and abut, down the transfer: purr•,Df; . Ms will insure that any release of' water is minimal . (c? pact ( a) in Support of binding 2 . 2 . 3 , i:elating Lo the quality of gr.oun1wator in Une, area , hereby is incorporated by reference . 2 . 3 DIOX" R UCES 2 . 3 . 1 �1 .ia ... �. The de-velcpment of iapprozimately 3 . ocres of the project. Site will destroy weedy sped es cn the Pru1ect Site . FiDdiAQA,4 The City hereby makes finding ( 1) . J!Agta_A.IL..E1lpRgXt Af Findina : (a) The Project Site in currently disrupted, containing pi'«.en of .dirt from earlier construction activities . no cultivated or native species exist on the site, except for weedy plantb. . Landscaping will replace all vegetation last during grading and wid additi:nsl vegetation , (b) No rare or endangered spec-les are known or ezpect:ed to brood on the Project Site . 2 ,4. 1 knteALW P The grading cf the Project Site and excavation: for foundaticne and well cellars will distutb any rndiscovearled archaeological and paleontological resources. [InI318gA: The City hereby makes finding ( 1) . I.iAi".ts in SUggort of Fis dun .. 1 (a) There is little likelihood of undiscovered resources on the Project Site. The majority of the known archaeological sites in the City are located along the bluffs along the banks of tho bunts Ana and Stan Gabriel I Y4i `t t Ono* q , Ir. 1. pf� rs . rha two archascingic;t1 sit oeare•!t the Proj► at Site Grew approximately, 0. 1; and, l mile away from the Project Otto , (b) Curing grading and excavation, earth AKivinq crews shall observes cuts and apoila for potential archaeological finds . In the event of a potential find being located , operations shall be suspended until the s ignif icur.-P. of the find is determined . The projoct will be conditioned through the use rCermit to follow tpecifi,ed procedures in the event that remains are located . F 2 . 5 L 11..�.ili �.... � n QEUML_PJM 2 . 5 . 1 kattutiAl-Wj=: 'trio Project site currently is zoned "told Town Specific PlartO (Diistri^.t 2) . combined w:tih Oil Production, (0) . The '"O" ail District prohibits drilling . In order to implement the project , a zone change from "C, to "CI" Oil District is required . rigidigg : The City hereby makes finding ( 1) . (a) Section 9692 of Article 969 of the City's Zoning Code prov3des for they eeatablisb nt of 601" Districts . The only limitation for such an 01 District is that of a minimum surface area (100 feet by 1.50 feet ),, as required by section 968d' . 1 . The proposed drill site for the Project is considerably larger t:h&A the minim,rm dimensions wequired by section. 9662 . 1 . Therefore, it 13 conaintent with this provision . (b) Section 9602 . 2 requires dedication, or art irrevocable offer of dedication, of all real property that than City may reqt;.rre for its streets and other public service facilities or Improvements . All City-required dedications will be implemented through the tens of recorded tract maps for the project site . Therefore, the project ,is conxistent with this provision . 2 .5 .:: ftt�i,al LJ_Xm=_,: The project zoning must be consistent with the MuntiAgton beach General Plan. According to the general plan, Ocensistency ,between the zoning Pr panal and the General Plant would be determined by consi-aorinq ell the policies and programs of Mach element of the General Plan and their relationship to the proposed soning. " Flind,ing : Tho City hereby mokep finding (l) gip.. 'a _ AM I }'A�',y III • 144V ! 1 The following policies of the Ge %eral k�A' en -OPP] 'Y to they Project , ''he Pro j a,Yt Is consistent with these policies for the reamoner nt&Led below . %kcLioe �l.". .�. "Encouraging 5eaut i t ication of oA l producing areas and restoration of non-productive oil, lands . " The Project will removes oil. produci.,-aq fscilitieE, from 6 esitos , thereby pe:cmitting the vestoz -. tion of oil sites scattered over 160 acres . A thou;oh oil-producing facilities will remain on tnes Project site, the appearance of the Project site will be impr.oveeed over itix present ` condition . Therefore , the Project is consistent with this policy . I *Priorit'C Open Sgbo . '.o_�."ail production Areas" are included in "r."h,i .rd Priority Areas , " defined as "areas containing valuable asseetL (not of less significance) which should be incorporated into a comprehensives Ope3a $.pace end Conservation Program. " M The Project site is not included in any adopted Open Space or Conservation Program. "i p u.x e Rg fi Q 1r�B...Q�t 1 f.�rY�t i.orL "Mineral Ree$esource v" are listed as "Second Priority Areas , " accompen ed by a policy to "encourages utilization of mineral, oeal.th; prevent blight , pollution, and undue destruction of natural features . " The Project will use seacondazy recovery Leechniqueers to Increase the efficiency of oil production . As conditioned rend mitigated,. the Project will not add to blight or pollution. It will result in esignificL;it ceductiones in air emissions from existing oil products, I-N� facilities , and will remove unsightly facilities in six areas which area located clones to residential areas. Therefore, the Project is consistent with this policy. rigurs-?.-� *Open IRAQ& mind Qnser _a 6,j an P ,4n" : "That plan encompasses all existing and planned open space and conservation programs as well as several additional projects . " (General plan at p. 16 . ) no open space developments, open space plan areas , or scenic corridors are designated on the Prcjeaeect Site or 15 . wiLh.in the subsurfoce Project Aron . They W.-Cri11eri Park site, the noormat fdontitied site, itc fW, b10Cks try the north of the afte . ftours. L. Xlj. + k.-ag.art... tsua. The P r o j e c t s i*- i s located in Zone C, *Minimal, Flooding . " Thereefo e:, the Project in not in a flood hazard area . tIDA 'Continue E..o require geologic investigations of all si gns fJ c -ac Amvelnpmont: projects stid to stipulate by Conditions r Apptova,l that all construction within those projectd be designed to withstand predicted probable ground motion accelerations . " Project structures will be designed to Withstand predicted probable ground motion occeleratio s . Project engineering will prevent the wel cellar from being dsmaged, even in an 14 g earthquake . They oil storage area in surrounded by a depressed retaini.ag box2n which exceeds the Ueiiform Fire Code and Division. of Oil and Gas requireemenLa . Therefore, the Project is cons; stent with this policy . fig Lion .2aJ L,A1U "GOL?1 : To reduce to acceptable levels the degree of noise exposure from all transportation, stationary and other nuisance sources in the community to insure tho public health, safety, and welfare . " fiectir, n ,, ,,, .2. Z;,. "Objective : To minimize extexnal noises and prevent them from penetrating existing quieter areaz - ro tJSdL_LJAJ- 3 , 21 "Policy: The use of quieter auto- mobiles, machinery and equipment should be encouraged . " section ,,3 ,3 . MjMuM No se Ls aIJU "The optimum noise level for all residential uses In LDW 60 for outdoors (approximately oquivalent to CNEL 60) and Ldn 45 for indoors . " The Project will be conditioned, through they CIIP, to e zceeed the rerquir*ments of the City noise code. Truck traffic shall be limited to daytime hours , and double mufflers shall be used on production hoists , earth revving equipment, well service rigs and backhoes . Only electrical motors shall be used on drilling rigs and production wells . Ito worgency generators shall be used . Therefore, the Project is consistent with thou* policies . 1� } w,ar R r `low ►, r +k+ n; LmRina QRer1," nN; Ocon] idar restricting eiew residential development within 25 feet of.' an electric. Motor-driven pump. Although this section ii% not directly applicable to the Project* it implied that a 25-foot buffer should exist between pumps and rasiidential areas . The pampa on the Project site will be, in excess of 100 feet from the: nearest residential unit . Therefore, the Project is consistent with this polio'. (d) aecl on -ZLIVM,at . n'___a?„-13 . "Migi turd .� !�" 1_ �....�.�cre e t i gn ;Ll „ . "Figure 2-11 show; the existing and proposed parks at ultimate development . " They Project will not adversely effect car preclude the development of any recreation facility shown in Figure 2-13 . `Cherefore, it is cronsi.stant with Figuro 2- 13 . (e) of rruj. '..ion amnti J.g,2-1;4 "Goal : To provide a multi-mode transportation system that er. ouxas the safe and effW,ent Movement of people and 9004a . w The ]Project-, will not cause or result- in significant traffic increases . It will only reequiro three truck. tiips per day, which is too law in volume to create a Significant adverse impact to safety., Therefore, the Project is consistent with this ipc,l� cy. ASCtJQQ_.LA- a 0 2 - S.;• "Policy: provide adequate truck and raid service to industrial and coamrical areas while provfdinC minimum disturbance to residential areas , " 'Ate Use Permit estelblishen truck routes which will ol:aimiae disruption to surrounding residential areas . Therefore# the Project in consistent with this policy. �f) �� HighHeya No policies in the Scenic Highways Element apply to tie Project. iL7 . i y l` .i "ACUon . monitor changes i.n Industrial and Commercial Itrict. uffes to assess their impact; on reaAdent_iaMl land use. " The RIX disr. ussion of growth-inducing impacts descri.ben the effect than: the Project: will have on residential development , as well as the impirct on further residential development if the Project is not approved . Therefore , the CiLy ' s review of the Project complies with this policy . �. 'too _a.�a 14 ",,,. ., "Action : Review all changes in p,lansiodl .land uses to deteratina -the cumulative impacts on conmunity facilities . " Tbo f'tlt discunuion of cumulative impacts describes the Frvject ' s cumulative impacts on community facilities . Therefore:, the City ' s review of the Project Complies with this policy. I l ecti0 ■ � . . � : OAc'tion: Continue to actively enforce land use ordinances . ' � r T h Project. will be subject t�� si1 City land use ordinances and rElqulatiens, enfcr-ced through conditions attached to the CUP . Therefore , the Pro ect is consistent with this parity. (h) I ��ii ► fiect Ion_-LJ.412 .3 0.51 'To provide for the proper development , maintenance, improventent , preservation] ants use of the City' s natural resources by removir!g and restoring oil production are�+s on walls, become non-product iva . " The approval of the Project sex ll permit the aaandornent sx ll rmeoval of 22 wells. Pvior to termination of Project oil operations , a plan must to submitted to the City, showing hors the Project site will be abandoned and rextoretd . There€oro, the Project is consistent With this policy. "`To provide and maintain a quality living eavironwnt so that members of all economic, eocisl , and Othnic groups may reside in Huntington beach by providing an adequete level of comrrmnity services, facilities , iimp,rovementa t and maintenance in all areas of the City. * As r . ditiened and Mitigated, the Project vi1l increase the .ality of areas Nurrounding wells to be abandoned, 18� . • ny I , because the apposa-ance of the well sites Will, Le im�t � uved and they could be developed for roxi.deenH a l uses . Thedrefaae, the Project is consistent with this policy, 1�ectian _; �,� "To a+ee k olit and ancourage industrial development that will brGaden the City' s src.norm c base t that is diva reaiffoci, that is well related to other land uses , and Lhot provides JlocAl job oppor'tuni ,•,f,ars by: " 'Locating industrial uses adjacent to { compatible land uses . " They Project will remove oil producing facilities roan 6 aitets, thereby eliminating potentially incompatible land uses from residential areas . Although oil producing facilities will remain on the Project site, the Project elite will be Improved over its present condition to reduce or eliminate potential !and use conflicts lie^ts with the surrounding neighborhood . Overall , the Project will reduce the potential for land use incompatibilities from oil developments in residential areas . Therefore, it is consixtant with this policy. , Ctign,.,3 .a . 2 . 9 . 4 : "Esta►blishing effective onvironmental atandsrds that mini-mite the external effects can other lanes uses and the a nvireann. ent: . The conditions and mit1gation measures imposed on the Project will minimize its ` xternal effects on other, land. tines , Therefore, the Project is consistent with this poil.cy. set: _._. a *Eliminating conflicts between existing industrial uses and non-compatible uses . " The Project will remove oil producing facilities from six sitas, thereby eRl,imi>nat:+ng potential incompatible land uues from residential areas . Although rail producing facilities will. reantain on they Project site, the Project site will be improved over its present condition to reduce or eliminate potential land use coitf l icts with the surrounding neighborhood . Overall, they Project will reduce the pote>entia. for land use conflicts from oil developments in residential areas . Therefore, the Project In consistent with this policy. 829tJ12n 3xlmg-2; 1: •coordinatee the installation of cceawnunity facilities with street improveemente where possible- * 19 K y ire The Project uIll, provida, concrete curlbn and gutters in con junction with they construction of ha `f streets . Therefore, the Project is conaietent with this policy . Although this element ad6rapses cosettal pol. icie3s, the following policies relating to energy resotirce= could bo applied to developments throughout. the City , "Encourage the productiop of ener4 resources an efficieretly as posrsi�.)ie wit.ti minimai adlveL-se impacts . " The Project will use secondary recovery techniques to increase the efficiency of oil. production . As conditioned and mitigated, the Project: ' s adverse effects will be minimal . Therefore , tr--% Project: ie consistent with this policy. 'Freourage unitization and consolidation of existing coil operations . . . to the maximum extent feasible and legally permissible when such activities (1) reduce the area used for oil facilities,. (2) are not more: enviro m ntally disruptive than existing arrangements and (3) do not: jeopardize public health , safety or welfare . " The Project will remove oil producing facilities from sii sites scattered over a 160--acre area and consolidate them on a 3 . 1 acre site. TMI; will reduct the arees used for oil facilities . The a',aandonmer,t of existing reeks will. eliminate potentially incompatible land v,,as f r,-)m resideentfol areas . Although oft producing facilities will remain on the Project site, the Project ,site will be Improved over its present; condition to reduce or eliminate potential land use conflicts with the surrounding neighborhood . An conditioned and mitigated, the Project will not jeopardize the public healtho safety, and welfare. It will reduce potent;i.: '_ impacts from fire and seismic events by removing esisiting oil facilities which are located in close proximity to residential zreax . ThereforT, the Project: is consistent with this policy. BeCtign a fi -2. 6. 2( "Utilize the oil suffixes to *nsure that coastal dependent energy ortraction is scco=wdatod in areas designed other hen resource production, except for anvironmentally sensitive habitat alrasa." 20. 1 • 1 I `h The chatige of Zone for the Project will Util :irey ara Oil suffix to ensur+a that energy extraction is eccnmodatbd in erri a rea rent specifically designeated "rellource prnduct ion , The Project e yet'st Incaated Jiro an ` environmerntsA ly sensitive haoitot llv% rkifore, the i Project is consistent with t:hiee Policy . SeCtioLA. . .L " . . . [Consider) " enhanced ' oil recovery activity end . . . enarare the evaluation of impr,ets extraction. " This EIA discussed Pik-k .int.ial Impacts of fte randlary water techniques which area ei fer+ent: from thL',&c mit-h conventional extraction (see, ee.t discuse✓sionr of subsi&,.nce and Injection water) . Therefore, the Pro j ee` .. is consistent: with thLr policy. r_i llr .A_. ..L.4_,' I*T'romrte compatibility of ail and other energy-related activities with qurrounding uses to the ma:imilm extent feasible. " a . * . . . include measureN such as additional requirements i regarding fencing , planting and landscaping to ensurers aesthetic and env'ironmesntall, compftibi.l.ity between otl activities and other vs6s . " They Project will comply with Chapter 15 . 22 of the City Oil Code (Screening and Landscaping) . Therefore , the Project in ce nskat;ent with this pot j y . « . 5. 3 RD $ tial l�ffec : They Praj Yct will be located in a predominately residential area , which reauld have land use impacts on surrot+nd i ng residences . f izu; The City thereby makes finding ( 1) with respect to all lend use impacts gice yt those specifically ider: f iead in Section 1 . Fse,ta . Ie'i>AA : (a) The Project will result in they abandonment of 22 scettevre d wells over a 160 -acre area. It will also remove 7 associated tarok batterias . Therefore , the ProJect will reduce the numbot of residences which remain adjacent to o12-producing uses. Currently moms residences ax© witha.n Za feet of easisting wells that will ba abandoned under the ptiponed Project . Fox eazeamplee, on the Ville St . Orois site e 5 operating wells area located within 20 feet cr less of condominium units. 1:1 total , therefore, the Project will ererduc• land use impacts from oil-producing uses. 21. 1 'w y 11 hI rP 1 i (b) The Facts in fuppoxt of F•irid.inys l . :1 , A . ."; , 'x. 2 � 5 . Z , 2 . 6 and 2 , 9 hereby are incorporated by ref e t inve With the exr-ept,ion of aeatypit. i c impicts , di.scuoved in Section :. . .l , mitigation measurev and alemeMnt & -)f the, Project which will roditce impacts on the ens►i.rorment will Arlan ienr ure Projeot compatibility w,;.. vh uses . (c) Usa Permit) 68-25 Includes ocvndi born int-,; ,,ded to anaute that: the project is wii. , the+ evrrounding residential area . 2 . 5 . a. 22tenttel. _Lffec;: The drilling phaso of the Pro) ect will be in operation 24 hours a day. Lighting for safety #11.1 be required at: night . Some lighting will be visible to adjacent residents and passers -by , xIiadl zAa a : The C 3 t. y he i eby malce►b finding ( 1) The following messurea will mitigate the: itlent i fi.ed impart: to a level of insigniticance. ( a) Light and giare LiAall be directed or screened to i prevent any direct: glare from project lighting outaide it parameter boundaries . (b) go flood ) igh'cs shall be used. Lights will be lore profile (i .a , , will light low valve and equipment: areas only) . (c) During drilling, the derrick will be enciosed and a,•1 1lghta, excerpt the aircraft warning light:, will be on the inside of the acoustical blanket . Lights around the auzilliary equipmeit will be near ground level and well )below tt+e top of the 301 scousticsl pall . 2 . 7 l'F. ...AND GIitCt.'t.�T1di� 2 . 7 . 1 fttMtial ZHSAt , During the drilling phase of the Irro,;4ct, 3 heavyvthicle (truclb ) trips a day will be generated by the Project. EWLm: The City hereby makes finding ( 1) . F'Aa�I . .in�� .� _..t1 _.. I. The toj lowing seasureis will mitigate the ' derltifi.&A impact to a Leval r)f insignificance . i i 22 . I Y y 1 t i' (a) During the drilling phaAh, all heavy !ruck traffic shall be ).i.,atted `o the fallowing stroOtu betwea,n th4l 40b yreway egad th,a Projac:t rite : aeaiCh BOUItTard , Adams Aveooe . and Del,accari dtreet . Zt.triwncee to the site shall occur only on Velawaro Street , Sprirrc;fiexd Avenue and Ca l i form s Street . These trunk routes and accesses 1yeze reviewed by City ste►ff and were chosen to reduce impacts on the adjacent local neig;,borhood . (b) Tmck traiff is shall be limited to the hours of 7 : 00 a .m. and S ; 00 p.m. E (c) TTuck deliverie3 shall be staggered so that o trucku rhol', wait on the street for longer than fives mi.t;utgbz . No tucks shall be permitte#S to park on the � t t, rr-ff ' shall he d t.,,c� 1 scree _e� affeo w � by truck k �.c l nspec,ted +T)d & f ter ecnstruc,:ti,on . Any damage to jocal t'y �:e vy- trucks shall be repaired and -t occ natructed pair Lit,y :.equi rements at the. espenae of the I?Zoject applicant , (a) xt will L' 1. necessAry to restrict pa.king on thu We stree!i U, a cxr,-mmodatµ trucl,.s . Trucks with a tuyni.Rtg rmdiva of 5-s :eat uar, easily turn f'xom Springfie-ld Ai,, nue anto Califo r.n a V rest . Curbs -;ill be painted r .d to prortihit Pa;730 r� for 1.0 feet can eW%ter aide of the ri�� i •re+way�: • (f) An overload prarmi.t shall be obtained from the City and Stars ( it rbgvired) fou all overn:zed lomda to be moved on public streets . 2 . 7 . 2 .i V a1 _Zffect : Miring Cho drilling and conpitrucLion phases, traffic vi:l increav nominally in the P•rnject ricirl,ty . 1t ,i no g The City, hereby ruakota finding (1) . )� ,�. ..�11C+wr�. •-._. ZfZindirin: 'The following measures *till mitigate the identified impacts to a level 1 Of iLsigniti,canc:e . I (a) All employees shall park on--site. (b% Becatine the rro j c ct w: 11 pave and add curbs to currently unfinished #treats , approziYaately 1,700 feet of additional au rbside on.-street, parking will be wade available to area residents by the Project . I 23 . I I r ,w (c) During the pro-drilling construction phase, truck routes as •pprowed by the Department of public works and shown In tho Circulation element of the General Plsn ohall be used . (el) Truck traffic shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 a .a. and 5: 00 p .m. (a) Truck deliveries shah be staggoreed oo that no trucks skull wait on the street, for longer thrn five eainutes . No trucks shall be permitted to park on the streets . (f) Local streates affected by truck traffic shall be Inspected before and after construction. Any damages to local streets by heavy trucks shall be repaired and reconstructed per City requirements at the expense of the Project Applicant . (g) Additional Project-related traffic will he of short duration and gill involve less traffic than a normal construction proje:t•t . (h) During the product ionrinjection phase, theme will be no lncrQase in t nmf f is in the Project, neighborhood resulting from thu Project 2 .7 . 3 Egsj=a q#- : The; water pipeline from the Chevron site will disrupt traffir: over a sharC periorl along the following route: frota Golden nest Street east along Clay Avenue to Huntington Street , then south along Huntington Street from Flay Avenue to the facility site at Springfield Avenue and Hunt i.ngton Street . rindin": The City hereby makes t'inding (1) . Facts- DL. B�LtPRja'ft of Fin ingA: The following aeeeaesures will mitigate the ideentiVed imyaet to s level of Insignificance. (a) No more than one lsne ok traffic shall be closed during the day and no lanso shall be closed at night. (b) Busy interredions shall be either bored or p.ated over eio that traffic interruptions will be kept to a min imm. (c) Uveerai hundred feat of pipeline will be Installed, surveyed, inspected One the trench bacR -f:lleed In one day. Therefore, no one aron will be affected through,aut the peen iod of construction. 24 . r x, wr • ti ti• 2. a Weerntfal E9iffial: Temporary dust impacts will r4sult from Project construction activities, including the construction of the water pipeline. Findings : The City hereby makes finding Facts ip Support of Finding They following *exures will mitigate the identified impact to a love? mf Agnificance . (a) A dust control program shall be submitted to they Department of Development Bearvicees for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits . (b) Exposed dirt areas shall be minimized in the Project design. Roads and parking areas shall be pave,J and other open a:L, as shall be landscaped or. covered (with gravel or asphalt) to minimize dust generation. 7 . 8. 2 9a_,,: p_t : Pollutants will be emit':to ell by construction equipment and by veh'.cle trips . Mdings : The City hereby makes firJing ( 1) . (a) During the ct>xtstruction phases , o:a1y 17 two-,Pay trips will be gene;, aged by the Project . Thirty--two two-war trips will be generated during f.n,3 drilling phase, and 7 dur.zeg the injepc:ti.on/preyductiron phase , The emissions f porn this number of kripsS is not•,, signs f icsat . 2 . 8. 3 P'J"ce 2itial Eff pia production facilities, particularly tanks , can be the rsourc:e of fugitive hydroca�t on emissions . FiUdJ,ne& : The City her.aby makes finding ( 1) . (a) As roquire d by thia South Coast Air Qe:ality Manageawnt District, Project oil handling and storage tanks will use a vapor recovory, system which will, reduce 95--98% of hydrocarbon eminsions . (lb) The Project will replace 16 eaxistia%q tanks which area uncontrolled for #Ai,ir pollutant emissions , including hy4roCarbons. The replacement of the 16 .-anks will reduce 25 . 4 ' t 01 �4 total estimated missions by 24 ,357 pounds per yeas . 1Xhe Seven new Project tanks with vapor reecavery, assuming 95% efficiency, will generate 30159 pound of emissions per year. The total emission reduction will be 21, 190 pounds per year, 58. 1 pounds per day , or an 874 reduction in hydrocarbon emissions . This is the wubstantial. net '. benetit of the ,project . (0) Further hydrocarbon emirsion redactions also will be achieved through the elimination of ather antiquated process equipment, including open grumps, oil-water separators and other similar equip►on:. which is currently uncontrolled for air pollutants . (d) The Immediate neighborhood surrounding the Project site will be **posed to 3, 159 pounds per year of emissions, or approximately 9 pounce per day . The neigh! orhood currently is exposed to twice this amount because of existing tank batteries located nearby . r 2 .8 .4 F.P.Untiall_—Effmat: Oil and ryas production F activities can emit t.an.zene, a known carcinogenic air contaminant . 1tnJngg : The City Hereby makes finding ( 1) . (a) An evaluation of the banxene emissions which may be associated with the Project was conducted using the South Coast, Air Quality facna!;ement DistriMt proposed Rules 223 (Air Quality impact Atwialyxee) and 1401 (Now Source Stevie,• of Known and Suspocted Carcinogenic Air Contaminants) . The Pxoject` n potential benzene emissions, using a conservative figure, will be . 00•a51 cubic meters per second, which in d to 1.0 titan below the release limits that require further ejir quality analysis . (b) The Project will 01.16minate existing tanks that are totally uncontrolled f`31: air pollutant emissions , including be»seene. Thareef.o:re, project probably will result in a not xauuction in environnaental rixk from t4txona emissions in the Project Are*. (c) Louth Coast Air. Q.etality Managewent District approved vapor recovery system* shall be used for tanks inn oil contact. (d) Low-lever , short-term exposure to benzene is not subject to XCMM proposed rules, because such exposures 26 . r• r �N i' Y' ,ire aot thought tv constitute a health risk. In the event. .7 Of an on-site spi l l e the system it deetei+ nod to pump the A' •pillod fluid back through the separation system and into the tank. spills would be contained an site. 2. 9. 1 Ratan Ratant I&I ffect: oil w oll drilling and pumping onerations, production wAstes and earth moving equipment , and reapair/matntenance equipment will generate noise which could affect residences in the area of the Project . The City hereby makes finding ( 1.) . rMets J4._9u2DQrt of F3nAings: The following measures will mitigate the identified iaopact to ra level of insignificance. (a) The Project shall fully comply with the Huntington beach Boise Ordinance (4rdinbnce No . 2379) . (b) A report prepared by an acoustical engineer certified by the County of Orange shall be sulmnitted to the Director of Deveelopmneot Services foz review and approval prior to coneneenciny drilling . The report shall tee acriha noise levels at the pro jest Site property lute and at the nearest residential property lines, berth with and without acoustical treatment on the !drilling rig and service rigs . The report shall indicate noise attenuation meezw;es naectsoary to assures Compliance with the Yiuntin,�ton Beach Noite Ordinance (Ordinance No . 2379) . This shall include the previsions .)f the ordinance regardivC a maximum hourly #veragee noise level of 50 dB(A) during tine hours from 10 : 00 p.m. to 7 :00 am. (c) Excessive vibration, as determined by the Director of Development services ,, shall: be reduced to awc+aptal�le l�eve�ls • (d) noise monitoring >r1 all be conducted under the supervision of an acoustical eagineseeTr certified by the County of Oranq* lteep6rts shall be submitted to the DIVOCMQ of Devvlonsant deraices within three working data L rFr,' after the c a`.et on of each phase of the monitoring Offort . The sonitorin j shall include the following : ( 1) pre-driliir►a oh nitrarina . Prior to the '* start of the dri i l yn A phasor noise e�eeessurawentes shall be *btsinod during the opetation of the Specific drilling rig which has been selected ands 27. :w. ,t � r 1 Ai poy ,., AN the mtessuremeents shell be r•ititeed to thowe which will be eeperienaeed at the n(earoat residential boundarles to the drilling sl,te. la, addition, the noise control measures which have beers, or will bee applied to the rig as nofided for ete pli,ance with the xoi se ordinance shall be ,r. Identified * h (2) itar . � f Driiiiaa . noise eseaesurownts shall be obtained during the ni.ghttim hours (10:00 P.M. to ?too a .m. ) for at least nas hour* on such of three, nights within the five day period from the : start of the drilling phase. Monitoring shall occur at the nearest residential boundary to the x, actual drilling operation, The noise level data shall be compered to noise levels specified in the Soific ordinances. where an e:ceeedancee of the Ordinance is identifieed , noise control measures shall. be sprlied and an additional two nights of monitoring shall be required . w (3) our____ira_ theDg ling Phase . poise monitoring shall occur during a six-hour period between the hours from 10 : 00 p .m. to 7:00 a.m. at lezat once each month during the Drilling Phase of the ProJecf The noise Level data obtained shall be conpar,.d to the Noise Ordinance standards . Where � an eesceesd+ance of the standards in ideenti E led , noise control measures shall be applied and an additional two nights of monitoring shall be required. (ee) Truck, tr"ffic shall be ., i.miteed to the hours between 7:00 a .m., and 5 :00 p.m. Ho trucks shall park on the streeet # and truck deliveries shall be rtagfiered so that no truck will emit in the street for longer then, five mfnjrtes. There shall be no entrance or ee:it of vehicles 't: from the Drill Bites ours o between the hours 10 :00 ,,�.. p.m. and 7:00 a ,m. , exer-.*t for emergency purposes . A double acoustical blanket enclosure shall be provided at smA-daoyr entrances . . ,T,V d"�r�.,,:; (q) so speeaker$* loud bells or busssrs shall be +esp 10?`ed on sit*. (b) duddlen high fregueM7 noises shall be kept to a nlmis by using rubber 11,ned pil-S elevators if necessary e it LL y 7 k> NAM to, r'a and grubber tire& to absorb the impact of tubulars Ming rolled onto the walk in preparation for running using . A OUNtical blanks*s shall be used to reduce this types of rMaining noise to insignificant levels . (i) All drilling rigs and production wells, shall be operated by electrical motors and electric pumps only. No mergency generator shall be used . Double mufflers shall be used a:: production hoists and earth moving equipment , further reducing the impact to the neighborhood. (k) Well aorvive rigs shall be operated no more thsn 48 days per year between 7:00 a .m. and 7: 00 p.m. or daylight hours, whichever is shorter . Res more than 4 well service rigs may be can the promises at any one time. The service rigs shall not exceed 120 feet in height and shall be double-mviffled and utilize acoustical blankets . ( 1 ) The 24 -hoar drilling phase shall not operate for longer than two years . w 2 . 9 . 2 kola;t,ial LP ffack : A backhoe will be used during the construction of the water pipeline , XJMLUW,.- The City hereby Mak.ea finding ( 1) . Facts In Suppor of -Zi ndlaw (a� ruble mufflers will be used on backhoes during the construction of the grater pipeline, and workmen will be ruutionedl to work an quietly as passible . (b) Any residual noise impact will not be significant because it will be temporary in notate and will only occur during the fair. Residents of each block will only be affected for approximately one day, 2. 19 99I SK aP UPS17AM LTK ,n1l,.�l� 1d- tout I � SpiliLaPo- • The potential exists for oil Y ,W' '7tr free the pip+aa, volves , tanks and equipment# and firm the sew i l amounts of crude oil which will be contained an the Rao lity Site in storage tanks . '*` EwAg92 : The City hereby SaMs finding (1) . YJ S ��et= _ fe -9u� � t ,F.�i.�.. + The tollowing ieaawres said al tigate the identified impact to a level of { insignificance . 29 . Y g t�' ,u (a) If on oil spill occurred during a rainstorm, suYfacO drainage water could become contaminated with Crude 011 The Drill Site and Facility Oita have been designed to provide contsiiwwnt of surface fluids such as storrsuater, and in urgency conditions, crude oil . The f Men shall ba enclosed with masonry wails which provide complete control nf surface fluids . All truck gates and aotn Votes shall have raised thresholds with either sloped ramps or raised stoops which preclude surface fluids from leeaving the Site. All surface fluids stall bo� diverted to catch basins . (b) The Facts in dupport of irinding 2 .2. 1, describinq the diversion of surface fluids to :match basins, hereby are, incorporated by reference. (c) if the tanks ruptured and Ppilled oil , the containment area for spill will coo" in appz'csimately 60, 000 cubic: Meet , almost two timeu a minimum volumes required by the State Division of s l L Gas . The containment area is below grade, arproximatsly 4 feet lower than the water processing area and 6 feet lower than the adjacent street level . The containmeni, area will contain any oil spilled from tanks . (d) The Project will use all now pipelines , valves, fittings , tanks and equipments . All pipelines will meet i the requirements of the State of California pipeline safety Act . All items will Le protected against corrosion by ono or more of the following: polyvinyl crlaride* costing on exterior buried pipelines , cathodic Protection systeup, paint coating on all above-ground pipelines and equiymont, epoxy coating on interior of water processing tanks , and use of stainless stee6l fittings . (e) An Operating procedures Manual shall be prepared for the traininq of all new employees . Mach operator shall be required to thoroughly understand and be able to operate esch pierce of equipm&nt in the system. The operating procedures manual shall explain in detail how to operate each pi*eee of equipment and include emergency procedures, shut-down of equinment and notification of authorities. 2 . 10 .2 RAtmAtIal =t: Various chemicals, both nor - basardous and hazardoust are utilised in oil and gas drill#nq production. chemical@ may be used to enhance the 3rilling wed proportion enuring drill of cil and gas molls, for dehydration of the crude oil to marketable quality, to inhibit corrosion, scale and baterial bevels , and in 30 . A, . r ^ ► '� r J' y treatment of the produced water to suitable reinjection quality. Kin4losa T)e City hereby makes finding (1) . Mgt■ in 1L, 2aart of JE11Mfiig1j : Tho follcming mossures will mitigate the identified impact to a level of �,. iadri�ni ft.ce►nce. (a) none of the chemicals used for the project will be used in large quantities , or would ever be used cuff of the Project site . f (b) All federal and state req;u►laticrns, including worker and commnity disclosure programs, site Business kmatgency Plans , Proposition 65 warnings , hazard lahalling and spill Prevention Control & Countermeasure Plans, shall be fully enfort .A . (c) terct (c) in Support of Finding 1 . 2 . 1, describing emergency action and spill prevention plans , hereby is incorporated by reference. (d) If a lol alined spill of hazardous materials should occur, .it would be contained in the area and no impact would occur outside the Site boundaries . 2rocedures to mitigate impacts to on-site workers :shall he included in the operations Manual . (e) The Facts in Support of Finding 2 , 10 . lo describing the containment or mat4s vials on the Drill Site and Facility Bite, hereby are incorporated by reference . (f) The State Department of Health Services has approvod a list of non-hazardous additives to rotary mud . There is nothing in the Huntington Beach oil field drilling history that would indicate that hazardous msterials will be required. Therefore, to the greateay extent f**sible, the operator of the Project shall use flan-hasardous additives in the Project ' s drilling laud . 2. 10. ,��#al. 21 Ct: Crude oil will be transported In an existing Chevron pipeline from the Facility Site to Chavroy%es re-pump station. There is a possibility of pipeline rupture. The City h*rehy makes finding (1) . in lggpgrt at XLMUAU: a;r A. �3r fp t !. 'll;1 M, 1' 1 (a) Tha addition of the Project 's all stream will reduce pressure on the Chevron critdo oil pipeline. secaune the oil from the projects will enter tht pipeline at a highor tempsrature then the oil currently In the ipeltne, it F.3L11. reduce the viscosity of the oil. This a torn will reduce pressure in the pipeline, thereby docroosing the possibility of pipeline rupture when coarpared to existing conditions. (b) Eden if the pipeline rupturied # the only oil that would be released would be the oil in the pipeline between block valves . Automatic shutdowns would keep the increauental volume of oil ct,t:ributable to the project at an insignificant laved in the event of pipeline rupture. (c) Chevron completed hrArotosting its pipeline in !larch 1086 to r pressure of 750 pounds per square inch . The test was witnesses and epp.roved for the State Fire Marshal by the Karin Corporation or, March S, 1988 . (d) The Proiect will xesult in they ahanefonment of approsimateley 21), 000 feet of ey►,isting pipeline . Marty of these lines are old, and their ezact locations are unknovA. The abae,ndonment of this pipeline will reault in a significant reduction in the potential for pipeline leeks . 2.10. 4 pot,cent.i;al FffaCt : The rupture of the water pipeline, or accidents resulting from pedestrian access to trenches during the construction of the water pipeline, could have public safety impacts , Findinag: Vie City hereby mares finding (1) . JzCt&JAAmRpgrt of find.n": (a) The Facts in Support of Finding 2 .2 .3, deicribfnq sseesutes mitigating any impacts on water qua 1 i',4, hereby are ircorporated by reference . (b) The water pipeline will be monitored with automatic shutdown pressure sannors, so that an7' sadden well below hydrostatic and will be eerily controlled by the drilling s:udr Therotfors, all anticipated subsurface ressurre will be contained by the weight of the mud. if a ire did occur, the open collars will allows the hire Depart,Mnt to control it from the surface* without having to enter the collars. 4 Z. id,5 Fatent !1 effect: Oil r�retlatid gas leaks could load to fire or explosion. 320 w.,P J JM&: Th* City hereby makes finding (1) . etfa in SaRv8,X,of Find aM : (a) A report made by GeoScience► Analytical, Inc. (Roberti Report) determined that a Los Angeles fire and e2plasion was Caused by gas that was biogenic,, or the result of bacterial decay, not related to a leaking pipeline or poorly abandoned oil well . It was also determined that only one of the 91 gas samples ■nalyzied in Huntington Bosch was petrogenic, or associated with oil . Eighteen samples subsequently taken in 'Huntington Beach were dart*rminod to be of biogenic origin. These studies indicated that the problem of methane gas hazard does not have its recta in oil field-related activity. (b) water flooding in are oil reservoir reduces the amount of free gas and lessens the passibility, of gas leaks . Any free gas f lcwt to areas of low prosru re . Producer wells are areas of low pressure, and gas will flow there throughout the process of repressurization . Injection wells will be located away from poorly abandoned wells and in close proximity to producing wells, ensuring that free gam will flow to the producing wells . (c) A contingency plan shall be ssbmitted to the Huntington Eeach fire Department for review and approval , with step• to be taken in the event that leaXage from any abandoned wells which do not most present day abandonment sequirenvents finds its gray to the surface. (d) The possibility of fire and/or explosion at the drill rigs does not constitute a !i.gnificant impact boctuse the drilling equipment will be equipped with Class III blowout prevention equipment . Additionally, the reservoirs of the Project are well known, having been produced for over 60 yem:s . The reservoir prossury is well below hy4rostatle and will be easily coritrolled by the drilling mud. Therefore, all anticipated subaw face pressure will be contained by the weight of the mud . If a fire did occur , the open cellars will allow the Fire { Department to control it from the :surface, without having to enter the collars * 2. 11 RaMr...&MICIS AND !WILL= 2. 31 . 1 Pa i timl ect: The Project could increase the demand on police protection services, including potential increases in vandalism and noise nuisance complaints. 33 . y4, yy , 7 1, 4 1 1 a 1' et The City hereby makma finding ( I) . AFACts IM Suneort of Lindin"; The following measures will mitivate the identified impact to a level of ;F insignificance. (a) The >rmropasaaai sit,* will be enclosed witil a ,r decorative masonry wail and with a landscaping berm. The well and landscaping will avoid providing easy access to the sites. (b) The Facts in Support of Finding 2 . 9 . 1 , relating to noise impacts , hereby are incorporated by reference. 2. 11 .2 Potential Jff9CJt: The potential for fires, odor or spill incidents could increase the demand an fire prevention/protection services in the City. : The City hereby makes finding ( 1) . (a) The Fi.ra vepartment has stated that it will actually have a reduced vorklood due to the consolidation of many ail producing sites onto one fully eguiped and protected site . b An on-site fire su reanior a stein shall be Q S PP �' installed as a ,primary source for fire protection . (c) Oil wells shall be provided with uses detection systems from cellars tn 24-hourn monitoring locations . (a) fire extinqui wheers approved by the Fire Department must be insttllodl within 75 feet of t•.-avel . (a) Metal open-grate covers shall be provided over the top of well cellars . (f) Storage tanks shall have r«s-plumbed foam Injection systems and exterior deluge watts spray systems . (9) The foam storage area and foam quantity shell he aplprovo* by the Fire Department , and firs hydrants shall be locatied'' in areas approvoG by the Piro Department . toSen sulfide detection systems approv.A by the Fire Department shall be installad on the Project perimeter, and fire extinguishers approved by tha F1 ro Department shall ba installed throughout in the Site. All gate openings must to 24 feet in width and instal:a►d In -1: ocw*iiancs with Fire Dopartxani Sroalfiostion 403 . r` ,a 34 h•1 a II It, M M 1 (h) X fu' vapor r ocovery system sholl be installad, as required by dChQM. (i) Only three orgy-site crude oil tanks are permitted, whtch shall never be completely full at once. (J) pact (c) in support of Finding 1 . 2 . i , describing emergeney action and spill prevention p' ins , hereby is Incorporated by reference . (k) Prior to termination of the all operation, a plan *hall be submitted For the re►`•iev and approal of the Fire Department and Oevelopment Services bopartment, showing haw the Site will be, abandoned and restored to its closest natural state. 2. 11. 3 k&t MtjAJ_ . L: Pairing -)f the Project site will increase stoxmwater , which could present: additional demands on they sewer systems. 44LJW t The City hereby makes finding ( 1) . MAIL. L.t1,.A= Fi nA i n a (a) The Facto in Support of Finding 2 . 2 . 1 hereby are incorporated by reference . (1b) The Project will take about 30,000 barrels per day of produced water from Chevron, which its currently dumping approi=ately 40, 000 barrels per day int^ tha sanitary sower . Theme-:ore , instead of adding MoVe brine to the agwer eystem, this Project will relieve the. systein of about 30 , 000 barrels per clay. 2. 11 .4 Potential lifect : During the initial drilling operation, a fresh pater demand of 21,000 gallons per day As expectet . Following completion of the drilling phase, J the water consumption rate will be reduced to 1, 000 r, ga� lees per day. n'": The City hateby makes finding ( 1) . giCt;x S JA Sugger% of Eindings r (a) fresh water use over the long term is roughly equivoklent to an must r i a 1 use one-third of an acre in ;:. A se,, or about i ettached residential units , Ads ate Ater supplies exist to Meet this d"and. That e7�ilible ito flow to 5,500 gallons per minute with 3# 000 ga110:15 "> k minute Ding the required fire flew at prirent. 35. 10' _:0 +rr M During the drilling phase , one truck per day norras '.ly wills be required to collect Arid transport liquid oil wastex and one truck per Osy will be t*quiiej to handle solid waste collected in modal bins. Following the completion of drilling . the values of wastes will be r'iaduood, particularly for solid rratt*s such an drill cuttin4a . The periodic clesninq of tanks during the operational phase will requI re► the removal of sludge from tank botto9ms y ZLOdWIL: The City hereby makes finding (l.) . Itse p in RuRa2xt. . f yindi.1, ga : The following messures will mitigate the identtfled impact to a level of insiginficance, (a % Dumping operations for of 1 f i e',d waet es are normally handled by contract uervice firms that RpevJallse In waste dis,;7+asa '( of this type . (b) Sludge from tank bottoms vi l l be deposited in a special dump equipeE! to handle this type of wants, and deposited its a Maser x landfill . M All Karate materislR, both liquid and volid , shalt be collected ernd separated on Alta, tempo arily storad in setal Onn and tanker , and txvcked to apprcprfate dinposal sites . (d) Liquid wastes shall be collected and stored in closed tanks to prevent the spread of odors prior to disposal . (e) Colioctxon are$s for waste Rhall be located within peripheral wall* and mill not be visible to c+asidsential areas . 2 . 11 .E ,ttgntjpI ZJ e : The Project wf l l regO re three business lines and a public phone on each pat cal . it is likely that an intercommunication line between the twu parcels will be included in the telephone systdon. dlnr[inaa ; The City berreUy snakes finding ( 1) . pacts. (a) The leneral Telephone Company provides telephone 510tvice to the City and to the project site. fro curre;lt inadequacies exist in the slrstesn. The number of linos wfrvicing the Prefect site is 1089 than the number of rr� Y z 1.c•+,'•,• ,"I•rT 1,`Ya did';;• ,r:, r',r I wbiEck would be reouired If neediu:a de nPi"Y 4MIMMUffstial units were developed on site. 2�1R •,r,' ,,: d« . 1 Drilling rigs and production s . "Ile 043 0 rated by $10etrical =tors a electric� ,. p« . � .X.h. i ..all omount of natural gas will be a 'with the oil, additional asturs'1 gas may be s lred for production. �r VALAUr The City heraby makox finding (1) . �''� � �►.,.i��ues►e r t oy �� a (a) Proper aisilxq Of the Well pug+.ps will nave energy by reducing the amount of electricity used. 4 ,. (b) nout,horn California Saigon anticipates no pfoblews in providing electrical service of the Project . $ftthorp Californio Gas Componyr which will provide any 0441tiona!, natural gas required, also anticipates no problem In providing service for the prof ect . (c) The purpoRe of tbo Project is to produce approgimateiy 9.0 million barrels of crude nil . 2. 13 MWINd 7 2. 34.]. � ►� , � s . Compared to oxiatiiikg conditions# the pcoject will have a growth inducing impact of 81 uafte. .At the City-wtele atrerage of 2. 7a psrsonsa per 1►aws crl�'i, the 57 riwolling units would house 158 persons. y' The City hereby makes finding (2) . A"Rart of ytndiUM rti; • (s) They 238 persons who would be housed on the Project site represents a population factor of only o. o$% of the estimated 1907 City population. (b) The Projectwill utilize two entire City blocks for the approximately 20-30 veear life of the project. based on "'-sting. Cenral Plan ana soning designations, but for they Project* both of the two project bloats would be used for residontial purposes . Vrdeer existing xaning , last rresi.deantf al units could be econstructod. on the site . $asod on eatutins general Plan designation, 76 units could be buret on the site. Thereforee, the growth irAuecing 37 . II M fIY,, r offect of tho p ro$ect Qouid bi less then the awsbor of Volts that could be de leloped on the Project site. 2 . 14 Elf 112hM ,1 2, 24.1 1*0 other oil consolidation pra eots ire in the preooss of assembly within the v60'121ty of the ftojoct. That cmulativo affects of these prejeots Doulto hove Impacts oil subsidence and gas looks . UMLRU: The City Ieretyy makes finding (1) . (a) The Pacts In suppo r'M of Finding 2 . 1 . 2, describing the effect of the Project ion subsidence,, hereby are face rporatod by reference. (b) The Pacts is Support of finding 2 . 10.fi, dewribing the effect of vs ter flooding on gas looks , hereby aro incorporated by Viftre racer, (c) to the Wilmington Yield, water flooding took plaice in an area where many wells wero damaged badly and j not properly abandoned. Vion with tLis larger number of improperly abandoned wells. there were no problems with injected fluids of oil or gas surfacing vi^ the.* conduits . lit)- The Signal Hill Field was unitine:d and three water floods iniitiatod In 2974 . Xv"jr of the wolla: in this I field air* as old as the Huntington Beach wells; however , the Division of Oil a Ges how roc*ived notification of "17 two weans that have leaked. 2*24.2 Mential ,. r In eoaJunction with present , approved and proposed developments is the City, the seacoadarry traffic effects of the lsduceed growth from the Project could result in negstilvee Impacts an the circulation system,& The City hereby makes finding (2) . Facts In su21'41rCr 1., 1 Undiame (a) Crrn -th Induced by the Project Is controlled by General Flan policies relating to land use designations and circulation Improvements. The land use designietions used tO gex:arfrta erstiwate:s of secO>dart' traffic iaepaOU from Lncluced growth are consistent with the current General plan designation. Therefore, the traffic 36 . ' ri�',1 • l',R.^y<. 1• (r, yob ii, 1 . , • •'rC tac*t*d by these uses has been taken into account in a►blis riso the devotsi alas circulation plan of arterial wtv"tu and hitim*76. This plan adequately aac dates t*619i.c estiwated 'to be generated by General tlas dW71sated. Sasso (b ) A recent tteffLe study r nducted fo:r The Matorftort wunh elvaluettes mWISIcipe traffic levels four the Nara o the City most likely -o receive heavy traffic flows frame proposed de lop"At, confir"d that traffic will operate of acceptable levels of service. (c) The Ya• irehieles wyaich would be asaocialed with ,.> the 57 units that constitute the growth inducing offset of the project represent a warp small i nc rew4at of the new ovhlcles that wi l k be arithis the a ran . s• l4 .3 R,t-Mat ill' nf!'er_t : In conjunction with presento approved, and propose* projects, traffic resulting ftom growth generated by the project may add to noise levela adjacent to circulation routes . Ii ,ngA: The City hereby sea uses finding (1) . r +raj 2001 wentation of the Optimum ltoise Levels, and of the Noise Abatemnt Plan for Traffic Noise contained in sections 263 .3 and 3.3.4 of the General Plan poise *list, will Tattigate these cumulative Impacts to a level of insignificance. 2 .14.41 fttelitial effw : In conjunction with asisting, approved and propos6d future projects. noise within the vicinity of the chill site and Docility site could exceed City noise standards. rtryllnew The City hereby stakes finding ( 1) . �in���.. of rindi ,: (a) rafts in suppairt of finding 2 .S. 1 hereby are incotporatrd by reference. (b) The measurement of noise is, by definition, a Oevioulativia" neasurement . It tapes into account background noise. By conditioning the Project to comply with than City's Noises ordinance, the City, has ensured that cuoulativt noise 1eveX$ will not constitute t significant a8aerrse impact. 39 . a Y r, o. + . k «s t As a secowery Off et of the tLl- Pat dutomo • ewr Scions associated with the 97 t' ling Its which constitute the troje ct• e orOWtb �r460t, in conjunction with present, a proved and rrflcpswnt. could result in pdrrerse mpaats an _ The City hereby makes finding (1) . toots rr.I n ,AusRut of Zi dLm: (a) It is estimated that vehicle emissions f, coustitutlilg a secondary impact of the Project would result in a daily inc*ease in vehicle amiss{one of 3, 596.3 ` pounda pert year. Any sir quality impacts from these emissiona So offset nearly six times by the improvomnt in air quality caused by replacement of existing old Al storage tanks with now tanks fully equipped with an effective vapor recovery system. The Project will result in a not reduction of 21, 198 pounds of hydrocarbons per ' year . 2. ld. 6 fttential ,fled: As a secondary depart of they Project, the 57 units which constitutes the growth inducing effect of the Project could generate additice sl school obi ldrem, potentially causing adverse of feet$ on the Mahool system. : The City hareby makes finding (I) . MIA in eMOsart of 11MIRBIL: (r) MUntiagton BOACh City schools h&VO been esper'iencing a steady decline in enrollment over the post ton years. Capacity in the school district currently exceeds student snrollment; and the schools impacted by the project area particularly well s1tusted to absorb additional enrollment. Projected Increased in enrollment from the Project do not exceed the excess capacity, even taking into account the ircirears in enrollment expected from other projects . (b) The total number of students from approved and proposed projects, including )Project—related additions, is 371 new students . Sriroll.ent projections for, union High School District schools shoves a decrees* in enrollment until 1990 . As lnerease is projected from 1991 through 1995 . Even with new development , however, the expected increaser in students from 1992 to 1995 is net enough to compoosate for the ozpected decline in enrollment between 1987 and 1992. 40 *r • � }"r.•, R�,/1 � r Er r J +M�� � � 'r f' yP r+� r .�•' 4 r �,1 q�r��'', I c��d�%� �'R'�P P 5 lRf •, r i+MMV" + �� , "�, ! + ` i ��' YpH. } d� p � ft':��� ��'�tr .1� �M�h� '+ � r � ! .. �,ruY��•' � '� .7Y t.. I���p � � � � �+. q yq. �rw., ��+ ��������r`�,';H;,•�r,� ��':�', , ,Y'iMy" .'�y, ru, :�•�"Kl�.n - � � f �.�•.�•, �u� ';1' fir � �P•.rn.N y � l�a ►�s » 4 �llop units ai net A ,;.� ...: 601 result to as Iscroaoo in 03raxlneffit. from qmtpje4 *ithin the bomPASties of the #& ol� Nigh gaol Diattiot. Wt ,.;,• �, � � � w`".� war. a ripn�r a, 1+1i rtu�.Ato, o �7� 00 r.G� i P 1 ' I Mt r f W i [�1 ;wr • . h t P r5 w p rMY l � + .. + M f�. + Y,; r moo Ira rr � . 1 "� ll "1� * &Lxnmto 1iF17.1�����■ g The Xx* def laos the �► a tetest v-i as tbe �4t�!l�� lei a ei�tstl�ng + '� #,09 Abe AU"U .�,� ,he A"ern■ _ive r rto � - Pj,Qie t t The City hereby f tie th a alternative in not eavi iromwintal ly superior to they Project. 'Poe to In u000rt.2JEADALUQ s (a) This alternative would not result in the 'i ObaftGonmeM of 22 scattvrecd wells over a lid acres area. Thorafore+ 'Compstela . to the Project, it would, increase the number of residances which remain as j ac:ent to ail-producing users . The existing wells would continue to r produce oil# gas and water without the addition of the modern vapor recovery systems, secondary recovery techniques, or state-of,-the-art fire li+ghtiag equipment ;* which will be Incorporated into the Prroject, The contioutrig use of existing technology would have dertvisotsl impacts on air quality compared to the proponddi Project. The potential for arresting subsidence, as causiog rebound, through injection would be eliminated. Ravens brine produced by Chevron would not be used for injection and would continue to be disposed of in tbo $ewer system. thereby Increasing the load on the sewer syst,era in comparison faith the proposed Project . Rusting facilities would not be abler to withstand the impacts of major earthquakes. Approximately lay m toot of existing pipeline would not be removed, thereby increasing the possiblity of leaks. (b) This alternative also would have positive srffects. It would eliminate the need for three heavy trucks par day to travel through the neighborhood adjacent to the Project Bite during tbo drilling phase of tA%e pre ject= would eliminate the possibility of a fire or a ■pill of oil or hazardous chemicals on the Project Site; add would eliminate the possibility of damage to Project facilities old wells in they *vent of an earthquake of a an nitudo of N & or greater . This ulternativa also would alrainate the use of perimeter walls, which would be required to mitigate aesthetic and noise impacts of the proposed Project. in weighing the positive and negative environmental effacts of this alternative, however, the 42 . +' j '• ' t� ,7+,, ' '' 'y,'^ r � fir, r -x �a P r P` M +S, � d has ermined that the positive effects of this A ,• .,; rastiva are less iigniti,cant then the negative effects . � t : The altegR&tjvee rl"Idi not meet project ob ectives yr. , fl ISO rAlt not pastrtlt the recovery of t million `"::. ► d at eed* oil 1W using 10000a r reraavee sy �a� lxiotii� oil epotationm would only recover B Mroaiaetely 500,000 barrole of crude of l $ Ahih,—„i1..�ri The "no project" slteernatire is feasible. 2 . x nsserJR&JgA _Ag.,. Altrrnative: The "reduced Intensity* alternative would involve drilling a number of limited injector wells for socondary all recovery, while retsialaq all existing wells curronLly operating in the 160-sore subsurface unit. Approximately ton injector wells would be drilled from one of the existing well sites . t,, 2 .2 Q maarisan. .gf I tba � �s eff f tha Alternative .to w.wwl �iL the :eIWU.wat..,.the .ZXgRQawd Pro, at: The City hereby finds that this alternative is not envirowwatally superior to the Project. J'AdU in SuillMrt g f 71 din e. (a) The Ore•dUMO intensity" alternative would not result is the abondotwwnt of 22 scattered wells over a 160- acre area . Therefore, compared to the proposed Project, it would ioctesse the number of teysidencets which remain adjacent to oil-producing uses. Boma of these residences are► Mithin 20 feet of existing wells; therefore# these residences wolS be less buffered from the noise impacts of reworking the wells. This impact would be particularly significant in the Villa at. Croix sitt, is which five wells are locate* within 20 feet or less of condoms ni true uni t a. This alternative also would require routing high- i ptessuro stater through lengthy pipelines under City streets. The possibility of leakage or rupture is a significant adverse impact which would not exist under the proposed project . Existing facilities would not withstand s major earthquake. (b) This alternative also would have positive effects. It would eliminate the need for three baavy 43. �r trdka for day to travel thtou h Oe neighborhood adjacent td the project site during t drilling bass of the 4914WO Would eliminate thee possibility of s fire or a il of oil or hasa*dous chemicals on the Project Site; 04 would eliminate the possibility of damage to Project l"Jllties' OM Wall* in the event of an oarthqu*ks of a ra it a of a or greater. Thine alternative also would i , a *be us* of perimeter walls, which Mould be Cir to mitigate aesthetic and noise impacts of the proposed Project. in "Sighing the positive and negative effects of this altornative, however, the City has detereriood ' that the positive effects of this alternative are loss significant than the negative effect*. ' 3 .3 .3 X1140tJIMpSal in &@&las�PtoJeCt. MiSellying : The reduced intensity alternative Would not ftat Project objectives because it would not result to optimum well spacing fox, injection. As a result, only approximately 3 . 3 million barrels of oil would be recovered. 3 .3 .4 XONgibilityo. The reduced intensity alternative is not feasible. �. Bata 1A.,AMDROrtI fa: This alternative woule require acquiring the right-of-May for a ' considerable length of underground pipes. Liability for these pipes could be significant. According to the , Project appliesat, the capital cost$ of We alternative MOUld be approximately the same as the capital coats of the proposed Project, while less than one-half as much oil would be recovered. In addition, this alternative would not result in opt- aum spacing of injector wells . If secondary recovery did not work under this system, theme would be no May to d9termine they source of the problem or to cure the situation. Based on thase factors, the Project applicant has concluded that this alternative is not economically feasible. This alternative also is not feasible because it In not desirabla, and may not be possible, to conduct well reworking in very close proximity to residential units. 3 .3 3.3. 1 Description _gf, ...Al&gZast,ila! Under this alternative, the, proposed Project would proceed as described in this $IR, ezcept that the drilling program would be intensified to reduce the tines spas: of the drilling phase of the project. a second rig would be used for drilling . The tyro-gear drilling period would be reduced by several months . 44 . i ,'YRM1JF . 1JM 'r r �t 1 a {, too su to i2c ma tramew Froloct: The a tr here r S that this altesgative is not environmontally superior to the project. (a) Arproeioutel twice as many heavy trucks per day (6 instead of 3) wou d be COQUItOd for the intensified drilling program. Two 165 ' 2144 would be used instead of one, resulting in increased aesthetic impacts and asking it possible that noise and light/glare impacts could not be mitigated to a level of insignificancep axe) The Project site would be occupied for oil-producing facilities for a slightly shorter perior of tiers# because the intensified drilling program would reduce the construction period by several months. Impacts of UA drilling phases, including the noire and traffic inp acts {extbouph intensified? , also would occur over a slightly shorter time period . When weighed against the more severe and possibly unmitigable impacts that would occur, bowever, this reduction in the drilling period does not outweii.�h the negative impacts of this alternative. s 3 .3 .3 Rffeetivengag in Iseetijig project Ohiectivas: The "ware intense drilling program" alt..iirnative would meet the Project objectives. 3 .3 .6 yea■ibility: The 'More intense drilling program" is feasible, but would be more ezpennive than the proposed Project 3 .4 QJ ALL 0116 $TTVA 3 .4 .1 .2tion_„al AlternatlXg: Under this alternative, the all facilities on the Project site would be removed and 22 scattered wells over 160 acres would be abandoned, as under the proposed Project. The project site and the 6 scattered sites would be available for other uses. R,axidentiail use is designated 3n the Ueneral plan: and Zoning. 3A .3 QXr. TJz2n of the Effeet■ gf the Altarrativil , tg thy, Xffects of;the a e gned lPra jact: The City hereby finds that this alternative is environmentally superior to the Project because it would eliminate the effect of oil-producing uses throughout the Project Area . 45 . Yy, wh'10 '.i } r '•S 1 i to V MM d *at "suit a the 19 verY e! any Apt oil gso* OWNSOM reserves. Therefore# it would not 4t the prs jott wh obIrtives. It +roar ld reduce the mount oil i could produced frog * million ba:rols to �; s#fe b�►rreli. 04,14 : rate altunative is not cessible. Rafttg 'In NUMart of : It is highly unl1kiely that a oil operators Mould all agree to abandon their operstions, and that (b) iready purchasers would be ev#JX#ble tow all of the sites . Tboref+are, in order to ittOi nt this alternative, the City probably Mould have to epquire the .aineral rights for soles or all of the Wells a sy four the absadoy%ment of the site. some arrant rit wou have to be made isith the surf see owner fort rtiMahmarmnWat of all or part of the Ci ty' s costa following resolM and/or devolnpuent of the sites . As a rough estimator using the industry standard oil $15*000 per average daily barrel of all production, it would cost approximately $1 . 5 million to acquire the 'i u1notal rights for all of the sites. Abandonment mould c st arppxozi-MOtely #. 5 million. This alternative also teenld deny: **"*a to the royalty owners of the minotal does not Opal a %Rapes. Was assuming that the Mineral rights could be woe s fa r $1.5 Mil ion, this fiqurle A � ►. va �h to Unrecovlet r�eftsrved'. which are, wortia In ��!0 tons o mill ions of dollars. . 5 n�►T 3M 2122s• RUCU 1 31.li.lILL Ative. parcel 1 Coa►sists of 1.* sores located to the norOwest of the project site an Pine Bt:roet, bounded by Yorktown Avenue on the novtb and Ut*aa Avenue on the south. The project applicant does not r the surface at the minerals below the surface* The d t4ogton sgach Company is the e:ineral *more Parcel 1 to survounded by approximately l-i acres of fee land which is - also +caned by the Runtington •mach Gangear. Although this is a is currentIr vacant* it: is Zoned for residential use. On October 244, 19854, the City Council epprovad the Huntington sesch Companir' o ro pe nt for a sons change and �enteral plan conformance, to p4ormit the residential evelopmsnt of this site wider "Old Tow Specific plan" Xoning . 1 sartel 1 is too small tc, accommodate all of the facilities sod well cellars c:ecewMY for an oil yt:ecovery a0; . i i t �iR.�+• i ..1 •r �, 'r',r• � t�M K A„� r+ 'r,�,; � ',ryF�` r1➢� i Y I � J '. C� r � , P4'?h ;X ' ',, ,r � �` 1�, ,� 7 ,�., .^. .7)n F ?„ • :,,•' y�Yl)'.,�1ti��j �•`�� A���,Gp, � .i'4 t i y4,,.�'��� � F•A � •� �7`.Z(� r� ' r 1 I r'Y�1 i• a •A t � .T � � rl +�-Alf I 1 i. �,n�rl r a v y r ,"4 ��• r r'` ly � r 1^� yy I h +^ f ryr��l 5� rJa z M.V1 1 • � , v . \ 1. ,r� u ��1f� .�. w III fil y �r�r't '1r r ��P,• ..., .lAr MY)'• '�il ) .'w,J� 1 •'� : ✓ 1„, .l,n, Y f+� ..�•n v. 1 ���C;,'•'i!'rfRt.•Lv�.� . i r v r, ., .�'! P�#. ', iR. )��' !�r, �M , r '�•y r I�����•vl, l i rot � . the pWoot realUti s site would « t p Orelis could be d:ri fled oh his 04i I have to be dri sled an the , 1 fr.. t, vjai& dit WkA Vkbok& �� t M hM ett ft oil 'not onvii9bilintillir : Approximately 60% of . the "tome 961 pro so 1 �d be dri l l.64 on pdpool l C Ai UVb this "0141d result In a slight Iredliction in M effects of the drilling phase on the as d = � , u0ding the Fra$rct, ri�llinq would q t two :r4rti "tisi "i#hborboads instead of one. ANt alkgb the areo sur%�ourAivq Paroel l currently is era at, it is proposed: far residential use. 0.50 fkall ..In ti a Pra1mst WSt�dh= Itis alternative would seat project objective8. + 2*5.4 ftw Z: This alternative Is not feasible. a"Jadinag: The Project } t ►pii. #I t. . etplotareal 1* port r�ror to ardor to o p #ei i 'g, site to drill intO 410 p tb04la!t I S tag1i01F Volt, the project a l+l ioaot would !�` 4rri, r is r t * !hint! toe .�► oft i h E orbp .r b lickC %a City lies been advised that tWe rwkit qto Beach Co any s pi Wing t surface davelop ant Qr 4A9, i �tosgp site sussaugding parcel 1, and that it i would not bq interested In 60147109 this development for tip 2046 "or life of the' pto bat. An October 24. 1088, C" t1W City approved a 598e change and general plan f ono m Mich will persit the development of. ' this site 0014 Two specific pits" debt t�p�• 1%1tho alto ativo to not 'fessibloO one• it is 40 44 beta* accomplished suace'irsfuIllr $a a INb ttgd wt time, taking Into account eaanornic, social, am 16041 factors. 3 .6 tam- - . WaIMMM am : A project designed to to solely develop" from Parcel 1 would need to be reduced to wise considerably. The 1. 11 acre site would only accommodate appronia:atelT oA^ 20-well collar and such smaller production/injection facilities. The southoestern 470 6. Look l r � 1r�r�,y/�• :�1.,,4�� ,)af � r,�n_p ear, 1 Hr s, `r• 71 'r. s�'.?h b-:9i•Fs.,STY.'' `. {'", •+°r,' •r , :r 51. r win pt t§4 p=o J eat oeuld not be soaahed by directional LTA retool 1 thogisfore, a portion of the its 09vid not Lo exploited. Won of the UM i 4f , eipit i 8 "ither environmentally 0 ' riat now* 4xv:44 oil MIR4111 isferior to the Prejoet . NFaeJS ill ftgeaCt at Z ftA4mm: Although the area *urroundi►"o 061r6e 1 curm ly is vocant, it is proposed for residential use* Vtojeot iiapacta, incluiing aesthetic Impacts$ the possibility of fire and impacts of an N 8 air diteater earthquake# would affect any such saridenaes . $.i*3 = We alternative would not meet Project objectives because r it could only securer approzinatetly 465 million barrels of ail$ pincrs injection rates would have to be loser and the Project could not be fully developed. It would also take longer to produce the reserves+ 3.6.4 Uegi This alternatives to not feasible. cif.. I a . iunaga, - of , JtiQdJMUs The Project applicant 4*e* not own parcel 1 . purthermora, in order to wog parcel 1 as d iurfade site to drill into the southeast sat of tbe. dpriagfield unit, the Project applicant would *ve to acquire pass-through rights from the Huntington $each Company. The City bar boon advised that the lRuntington Desch Caugany is planning a surface development for the 37 acres mite surrounding PMrc#1 11 and that it i woulo not be interested in delaying this development for 20-10 "or life of the project . On October 34 , 1988, t City approved a none change and general plan conf orsutn a which w1 i x permit then development of this site ander the 0016 Town specific Plan' designation. Tborefores, the alternative is not Ofeesibler" because it is not capable of being acccaplishesd successfullly its a reasonable period of times taking into account economic, social, and legal factors . 3. 7. 1 rtwscriat.i,gn pJ Alternativa: Parcel 2 is located an the southeast corner of Beach Boulevard and Adams Avepue. it consists of approximately 3 . 5 acres and is zoned 01 . Parcol 2 is located at they extreme southeastern end of the Wingfield Unit and would require wells ls to be 480 t yMy 'd. 4 grfp . ,�., M 1�J�a.rfSA` .,f•��Sr hf`�,,•v� •. , ,, , � •r., 'r ^� .' r J ., `J• ti�'1 r R to jk— TIT � ra $filled 1"(4111 48clood the 10901e1 pers"ters of conventional direati"01 0111ins. The site is too "all for the facilities Ms t0 80 snr the wollso Thesetere, the pfoJeot Biiit *a Site Would still he used. • R NO 41toiastive Sol me f onv#,fo�ae sntal X superior not envirsmsntally interior to the project . r pests in 2,6000 at FLMU a; Under this alternative, there would be a greater buffer to residential area►., and those is direct access for tcaiiic ftom Beach Boulevard. !However, impacts i'rom the drilling of Vella Mould offset rosidentiol areas and would be ieusreasod under this alternative because the •sells VOuid require a longer trajectory and would take considerably t 104jper to drillo nrill109 i scter would affect the •preople r ifiving in part of the $*&bri�pdge project because Parcel 2 is in cicYse prozimity to this development . The first phase, Beebridge Village* consists of tag units . This second phase, the Lakes at Beabridge, is planned for 202 malts, Jo7•3 A = this alternative would meet project: objectives. 3. 7•4 FeNg t: This alternative Is act feasible. t The Project a plicent has been vise$ that the property owner is p toning a surface development on Parcel 2 when the existing Chevron wells are no longer viable, and would not be interested In delaying this development for the 20-30 or %its of this alternative. Therefore, the alternative a not "feasible" because it is not capable of being avcomplishM succosalully in a reasonable period of time taking into account economic, social, and legal factor. in addition, the sits configuration would not allow for the drilling of the necessary wells, even if the facilities were located on the facilities Site 318 j Ta r- M]M SIT198Y...J IEL a- 31 b . 1 JMMqZJgtt.on al , Altsrnat ivs: Parcel 3 in bounded by Mmphi s Avenue on the north, Knox-sills Avenue on the south, Florida Street on the crest , sn;t Beach Houl.evard can -�he east . It consists of approzimsta►iir 8.2 acres and is xQued C-4 (Highway Commercial) facing Beach Boulevard *nd R-3 (riedium-iii.gh Residential) an the remainder of the site . 490 2rY r d I r ZA r 4.... e r ^r, +r+r '!1#,Ira + ( ' ;•1 + `,"F.i;T �' �i ��4�'•$'' �ylW j�uyy,.' . ' 40 r ''. ramt a in. located at tho a streso gout ilasteer" OW of the rinstiNld Veit end would ropire wells to be N: 41Slled ubtoh dosed the normal par"Otir• of conventional tip'",..., ��r�ti��a� �r�����g • ia City, re 40 at this altetu ees onviran"ntally superior to ! the proj . . JPsetu In ,t of Findings Mere buffering could be provided r the trite is lsrgwer w The 1"llities 494 the Molls could he consolidated onto one Mitej, reducing the perimeter of the all producing area . This could :seduce the impacts of oil operstions on surrounding residential areas . Ttts aitalrustive would not meet project objectives. D AL. i n= 1ef eindin2 s This alternative would not most the project objective of recovering - nine million barrels of oil, because wells would be unable to roach the thicktat part of the resevoir. It is estimated that it would result is the recovery of 4 masimm of six million barrels of oil ; 3 . 8.4 1 This alternative is oat feasible. Lai. a r rSuSgott of liadfsm : The City has bean advised that the Huntington 5e410h Company in planninv a surface development an Parcel 3 when the exist ng Chevron futilities atia no longer viable, and would not be interested in delaying this development for the 20-30 year life of the alternative. Therefore+ the alternative is not "feasible• bocausa it is not capable of being accomplished successfully in a reasonable period of t1w, taking l ntv account economic, social, and legal factors . The alternative also "112d be economically Infeasible. The land costs of the iltersetive site would be prohibitively high because of the C-a and H-a zoning ho acre-for-acre swap with the Project site would be possible. 3 . 9 ALTE7 AX I VE S I $1►�tCa� � 3 .9. 1 pose,Si2tia &-L Alteral&IIe: parcel 4, ftCalleen Park, is located west it Delaware 8tiset beatwoen Yorktoom Avanuo and Utica Avenue. It i6 a dedicstod park owned by SO. i.1MR�, it �. t4 r -1,'T• 5• .5. ` it'. „4y ' „`` _ y •� r ii I iW ��. If J i •y i Y ,. J1./''.. 4-,r M, of f., M � �I(r{ e'►f Y• Af r „y, l ^ •.' h� 1 f aF i'p IJIYr�!�` 'S ,, yS11j � •1 1 i s�'r r Cit and consiatV of approsinsto y S. 1 act*$. dutwou2no users ate residential (R-2) . 1" 34 2 n if rha XUAC the ,Altsrgliktive IQ " ..JILM&M. Qf�IJhM J? .&0M1d Zra�: The City hereby fiads tb*t. . kM pro+ ei;t to eevirosmatally Superior to this t art ,ItindLw: fte facilities and ' �r ��aw.w�r�._ _w� wwllb , 'and be coaroildatwd onto one SILO, roducing the plk .)ter of the oil-pr4duciag area . HOW07rr, the �z possibility of upset would be increased, because all of the malls would have to penetrate the solo portion o! th inglsw!oed+moo*t fault a wall daa!aq• by fault Movemant in 0 :w6'114AMM pbeftaft ion is the Wilmington 41i field, even whM no reasurable earthquake has been recorded. Although sbrfrca dal ge. to the wills or surface installations probably would not o0cur, dWA hole damage at the fault ntrrespt would preclude the proper abandowwnt of the ft"sd wells. this alternative also Mould eliminate a dedicated. pork. tbi.s !stoat could be partially mitigated by ` coriducting a land rvapm in which the Ptaject applicant treSed tbs project site to the City, A park eoold then he establipbod on the Project site. The park on the Project site mould bo oueller than the existing 3 . 9 acre site and t► v16 consist of tw separate parcels divided by a street , eraoU sd an adverse safety fslpact . $0 9. 3 M sattyflne#a in Ug Zroimwt Q�J1 1 • 1 ��I�Pr11.1�R._�/�IwA�WY�w1��� � This alternptive would met Project objectives. 3.0 .4 s+easililitwrt This 61ternative is not feasible. to I 14 ,5112209t at : she City dour not desire to mann'�' ►►• �Uftllen park for the Project site. 56terty Issues xeNtln4 to the need to drill through the 1"10 + *4--port fault sake this a loss desiable f',. �l1trl�r�,atie►i. do J.10 3.10"1 2seriction of h1 iarniti-ye: Neither block of the VzoJett bite, would be usod :'Vor oil recovery, but instead would bn aade evai lable for development of a medium density residential development project. Oil recovery operations would continue at the 22 wells within the 160 acre project Area. At density levels peirnitted by the 49neral Plan, the Project Site could be develop" with 76 sl . y ht y, -I T •j's�— - ` w, �• •. I..XIS I 1 a• , n 1" • atesidegmti.al units. The Huntington Beach Ordinance Code a 114M for the develop sent of 108 units .. and other p*ovisioBs of the Code may alXaw a greater number of units for by"ill purpose projects. :ivy the City hereby t da Ch Motive is not enviro�daal>ntal ly suporior to the Project . • �$�..�"a;it���t of. A�l 1 (a) This alternative would not result in the Mbat,.Jarae4t of 22 seattored wells over a 160 -acre area. Therefore, Compared to than Project,, it would increase the rit'.>nberat of residences which remain adjacent to oil-1'producing asts . The existing wells would continue to ptoduc* oilt gals and water without the addition of the n"ern vapor recovery system , secondary recovery tabholques, or state-of-they-art firer fighting equipment Wbieh will be incorporated iaoto the Project . The continuing were of existing technology would have detrimental Impacts on air q+Jalit:y co�paCed to* the proposed Vtojeet . The potential for arresting subsidence. or causing tobouAd, through injection would be eliminated. Rzeess brine produced by Chevron would not be used for injection at:'±d Mould continue to b* dispossd of In the saver system, thereby increasing the load on the newer system to comparison with the proposed Project . Bzisting facilities would not be able to withstand the impacts of �r maJoe earthquakes. (b) This alternative also 'mould have positive offsets. It would eliminate the need for three heavy trucks per,.dale to Caravel throagb the neigbborhoo)d adjacent ' to the Project Site during the drilling phase of the Pfojectrs would eliminate the possibility of a fire or a hpill of oil or boxotdous chadcals on the Project Sitq; Maid would eliminate the possibility of damage to Project foollities and Walls in tbss event of an earthquake of a nognitWft of K d or greater., This alternative also mould a►li.,aiaste► tho wee g9 perimeter eratlls, which Mould be tequir" to Sitigats, aesthetic and note* impacts of the proposed Project. In Neighing the positive and negative OnvLroamstal effects of this alternative, hmmver, the City has determined that the positite effects of this alternative ass less significant then the nelat:ive effects . Al) in addition, the *medium density residential dev*iopment" alternative also has the adverse 52. 4 W•fr -77 •t • a i p y',Y•,r 71Ay itti, I i ° •• A • r q�4•: I A,�•�r�"' �Y Y � , .y'�1'�'4�' � :A'{ �� r A t A r' ra i 4r �Y 1 I eavirrorwwsutal iWobats associated with the construction and Occuplacy of residential units . The Construction of rresidential units would involve the tewporaL iaSacts �rorMrrll ass aced with residential Construction inCludiag tneroasod noise, traffic, dust, risk Of fine, y VAint tors and trash. Buck Construction tolated impacts • WWXd #CCU$ fog `S period of batten aft* months and a tr mar ;. ' Trrattic amd parking impacts are associated with the sales of Centel sctiv1t1as involved With • residential Units . such sh sales or renter rolst*6 impacts may occur. ovsrt a peal f between txarso Months and a year' . Noise# tAYraffic, parkinq, risk of residential fire are impacts r ►resociated with the oacowancy of residential units. duch is►pacts Mould bt p*rnanant. 3 . 10 .3 ems This alternative would not reset Project ab etaives because it "Quid not permit the recovery of 9 mixiign barrels of crude oil by us nq secordary recovery t'ochniques. " lsistinq oil opbrat ons would only recover approximately 500,000 barrels of etude oil . 2 . 10.4 This alternative is feasibles c, i 534 •0? 1r:y �.M A'Y� 1 i 1� I • „ + �: M/ r Iy 1 ry 4 . 4. 1 �`I MIMS � RIATI TO PRQJPCT CONSISTENCY KTP TIM I: �I= =DW.T, TO Pp ADDPD TO SECTION 2. 3 . 2 . "The attaimeot of decss�t L si1Wt a satisfyi lvi� environment o � mcfor 1 id sill l , racial and :. ftbnic groups in Euntia;ton ftach. ,' s The Pro ect will : ,� Vomit the abandonment or 22 wells, which will permit the dpvelopm ut of boating on the sites of the abandoned wells . psisti oil operations no to%ear will affect the reps i da rt i al areas neat the abandoned oil facilities . As conditioned and mitigated , the Pro' 'ect will not pyri vent the Attaiment of a satisfying living eavitonment in the Project ' VICLOA Although the ��oject will have aestt L impacts , these Impacts bave been pitizated to the extent feasible. fwrthermors, t�# toject will improve the aesthetics of the ae i bO arbood su r t ound i the abandoned o i l fac ities . Therefore , the Project is cons"etent With this policy. sl 3.03 : '"she provision of a variety of x opportunities by t�rpe , tenure and cost 11 • • for btseholdt of all sises thrcra out the City al 1, } The apprdva1 of the Project will peewit the absddo-+-t and removal of Zx wells . The area as ptesoutit "eap1,04 y all of these wells ara curt;Wly ditsi ted arid' Soled for reeidentiml u8e; therefore* the Project will petait the cov stun of hoasin on these sites . 'therefore, e roject is cobvistent with this 00licy. 4. 2 •1 d� aktlp i IN. on IMIS or or L; The Chambers Groups Inc . proposed that the Stilt should evaluate additionei alternatives . The City determined that this was not necessary because (1) the SSIA discusses a reaso"ble rage of Alternatives to the Project, and (I) the ropoted alternatives are not envirotimentally superior to tie proposed Project . 54 , ,y '1 I . 4K J1. 4L Oil in processed skt a site rftOte f-TCG the proposed Project Area. The City hereby finds that this alterattive Is not eaviromentally superior to the Project. AI i ocessing" of oil sanely consists of to's the oil trce water. It this took plats on a site rMote frM the Project sites two additional pi :lines would have to be C octed . e would transport oil and water to the remot.,aw sits; the aither would return processed water under preseure. This would would create at additional havard of rupture because the water pipeline would be under pressure. The water pipeline for the Project, in contrast . is a low pressure pipeline. 2 . 1 No Oil Stors.1te Altbruftive . 74 P 010 The City hereby finds that this nd 1 olterattive is not eaviromentally superior to the Project . Ctj in AgnRart of . YJzdJM: (1) The Facts in Support of the Finding for Proposed Alternative I (oil processing remote fraw the Project site) ftereby are incorpo:ated by reference . (2) It oil wars not &toved an the Project any tick of fit* would simply be coved to the area In which oil Is stored . 3. ZVOMEd AltmatiZe: Alternative deSigne of the proposed facilities On the proposed site . Unding: The City hereby finds that this alternative in not mvironmentally superior to the Project . The current design of the Project Is Intended to 011tiPtojtct te Visuals noises and traffic isractl Of the On the DUCSOundint neighbi6rhood . ''<`/ ti'. ` ✓ +�^ r k1 L "iir tic^ 1d� M's , ) Y N y�f'{�l, � .�yTR t, J�yM y i^�� t/ I'���,,, },. yy y,.�• � �, � l ' r�i �i,i����/. .Pr 1/��, ������ M, � .� + c. w.i' � f ��fi��,.•J �1 :� f Irt' lR �•� f ,4 '� J• r. i tip ',, ,,a TA r _ .� �rfM+f�SM4•l*�,+.I:yy,rM�EIA'.y.�.,.,�,.,.w, , w.,^r•�,,.r4P�fMM' d.f •-� � r A1tatuSti" aeoipq Mglrg not 4.rolaated is the MR because t.tey would not r0lu dell and tn the ■its ation at i cts . The tar o Oc told t ions w*d through t1 t Project e�in aiti�ate� itp+�ct�t to the *L+.4mt foal iblO s to the ch"toA MULty. t need !or separates px� e ii 1. city beroby finds that thi• eR to . L," is sot environmentally eaperior to tie 'Oto"9 4 Project. (i) The facts is kpp4"Vt of pied ingr relet ins to pro f*4 Alternative 1 '-h*.* by are ppco� relferOsce. . ix�c+dt�rated by (Z) The Chevron focilM i t ycapacity astation and does ba •1l�ar 4ti Roll water . 4 �) .•�ti.1 _ Y � 4t -lot � 7W a { fi '1• T d i.•:,"��y,r f' �'ry4,'�' •r' 's`rR,: Ar ,' "- ' ,.fir,', r c. v' - Ja ;'Qy ',.4�.1?r'=�.-;f:r'�,y�.;.,,r rf, '.;j' . 4 "1.1r � ��,r•� + .r4TX77 y., " r r BOpp�,l�NINTAL ENVIRON -- M�ENTIIL Z!lpAC1 REQt1RT Na. �8 l BNVIRONNBNTAL IMPACT REPORT tip. 86-1 j s STATBNENT ap OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS ,a,s r'• The final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No . d8_1 f.e and Environmental impact Report No . 86-1 for the Springfield Coil Recovery Project identifies certain unavoidable adverse i significant envir"onmentLl effects . CEQA Guidelines , Section ' 15093, requires the decision-maker to balance the benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks in f determining whether the project should be approved . If the 'r decision-makerr concludes that the benefits cf the project �•r „ outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects , the , + effects may be considered acceptable. The final EIR identifies three separate unavoidable adverse environmental im-facts . (See Section 2 . 00 Draft Supplemental BIR 88w1 . ) The:a are : z Aesthetics: The neighborhood surrounding the project site consists of medium density residential usese predominantly in small 1 ( 8-10 unit ) developments and single family residences . views of the project site from adjacent residences wi l.1 consist of the screening block wall and landscaping . During the initial drilling phases , drill rigs will be visiblE . During the production and injection phases , ~temporary drill 5954 r All 16 Ib M. / J'�i i' ' ,' •Tip .t.' 1 `' . •�yyyyl!rr �'r 4r 'is l ••.11 r' fyy(1 •r• 4r•. , ,�:. . r � , x " i'W7.�'Y..r•i:-.y�yy.,,` , `,_; , ,',rSfR,,y,e' : �i. qT'1 !�"' . ,*!i•,r n gigs wili be used periodically for maintenance and will be visible from adjacent residents . Tanks will be visible above the wall. Usk Of 99a t .health and Safe IYIII■ r!IYY� �w■I�iwr��Yii�d111r ' Undex a► worst car'ae scenario, assuming that all oil tanks are ! full and the tanks are:, set out in an open field without surrounding perimeter walls, there is a "rare" (defined in the standard methodology for ris,► assessment as 1t10,000 t0 1: 1 ,000 , 000 chance that an oil tank fire could result in radiant heat effecting the area outside of the immediate 1 Project Site . 171 1 r, 8$ismi c If an earthquake of Magnitude of 8 .0 or greater on the RiChter Scale ocrcurs with its epicenter in the project area , • structures in the Project Area , including tanks and walls of the project facilities , would be damaged . Each of these affects is lesoened by the mitigation measures suggested in the Supplemental and original EIR, which measures will be required and incorporated into the project . ^A• ' i ) Ite!rep the City of Huntington Beach does find that the ,I'11 lr�, ,�� 5f } • 1., benefits flowing to the City and its residents from the project 1„r. outweigh the significant adverse environmental effects which remain after the project 's mitigation measures are implemented t and that the aforementioned unavoidable significant effects are Acceptable, based on the following overriding considerations ; 1: . �(41 1 -2« �' 5954 l Y. 1 + , r y;L;r it J ,�9�ir 1y' "M1,M•n ,' T�';' ti�•'1 �'f,� �'�, , �� 1�:;' A ('^ Yr,A,',.4ws' ;' +7•" �r4a' .. 1 „S. iSf •' r 1 Tba project will, replace 16 existing tanks which are not subject to controls for air pollutants . This will result in r a net reduction of 21, 198 pounds of hydrocarbon emissions per year , or an 87 percent reduction in hydrocarbon "A *missions . Further reductions in hydrocarbon, emissions will ' • ok,lao reault . from the elimination of other antiquated process - ; equipment . The project will bring about the abandonment of 22 scattered { wells over a 160-acre area . As a result , the abandoned sites can be used for other purposeA consistent with their General Plan and zoning designations . Fewer City residents r will lave adjacent to or in close proximity to oil activities . This will have positive aesthetic im acts on p p M 1 1 the City . 3 . The project will. result in the abandonment to modern standards of wells which have been abandoned, but ne)t to j ' modern standards . This will contribute to the public health 4j and safety. � ' . i ',. 4 . The consolidation of a number of oil producing operations on �•. a single site, with modern fire control equipment , will ' educa the workload of the City fire department . This will ^' contribute to the public health and safety . S. The project will use approximately 30 , 000 barrels of produced water for injection, purposes . This water is currently dumped into the sanitary sewer by Chevron . This will reduce the dEmand on the sanitary sewer system . f � �3� 5954 •F r•, rl � +1 p,;' r .... V� Y * .Y u,.Y ` ,), V r 1'.'. - 1�, e' "�v r lV �1,.r'. q � { �t'7'N, r � h r � � � 4 .. •• �' wa R:' ST +�� �r r �'1 1, +'•Vi, r� , It 1, r � Pro ; r �T 1, 1' 1 �. The use of water injection has been shown to arrest subsidsence, or even cause s slight rebound . The project will help to arLost subsidence in the Huntington Beach oil f iold e Another important consideration is the increase in oil I. production, from 500000C barrels of oil to 9 million barrels '. ultirmately, resulting from the consolidation . The oil will be �I used to produce gasoline ( 180 inillion gallons ) and other petroleum products ( 162 million gallons ) . 5934 rr r • ±1 I LL1 a ,1 r ' .jr, i�l `�y .�{y���~�.i il' �,., �1 � r� 1 . � • `�ry o^ 1, 'M •I �,I,r ' cl u,qA! r 1 Ali. 4 dw,:�I:f,,7• M .e r, 1'M. "^gyp' ll`lta` y.+'�ty'�.'•, < Res. No. 5954 STATr o Ar ss: CITY OF MOTTWON BEACH ) 1, 4 `f,�#It. 1. CONNI E OROCKWAY 6 the dully elected, qualified City Ci of Huntington Beach and ex -officio Clerk of the ''.. + ric Ofi + City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of ' me*ers of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; Yr" iL ". that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council ; Y at a regular meeting thereof held on the 71st day s of November , 19 88 by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers: Ke11y_ Green. ErS :n ,- ays, Bar.ni star TOES: Counc11members: h � . ABSENT: Counci lmembers: uty Z;jerk and, ex-ofricio Plerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California y r, 595 yi C e r R i AulApr1180 to Pubw Advarl:6wrNlls of 01 n. s M4%4 {x.W�C 40196er*av DaAreea b1 1h* SUPWIDr COW1 ut orange♦ Id=V. Ca111 me, NdmOW A•e214 oaurd 29 aaptainbW. 1961. and i 4t2193 1 doled t 1 JVft e9113 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 'y C) Courtly of Gra rMlh �eFeW1 t�ww wee �� � r Y I am a Citizen of the United States and 1a remawt of �'� •i� . I Ift COUnty e10l'ettiid; ( Am over the Of 0917111110 emirs, vW not a pWty to or interested in the below r entitled MlttW. 1 GM a prW10pai Clerk Of the Orange Coastt DAILY f 0t, with which is Combined the NEWS-PRESS. aM mayespolpar of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Coate Mesa, County o1 C snpe, Sleto of California. and that • Notice of .Z11 1� soar I nQ _.._. of which copy attached hereto is a true and complete ' copy, was printed and published in the Costs Mess. NNwpcsrl Beaah, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, Irvine, the South Coast communities and Laduns Beach issues of said ne"pew' ltv na4 .L1.) ..._ consecutive *eeks to wit the issue*) of i 8 .�......... e� 10 t98. IDS log .....�..�.._..... - . 1 g8___._ I dtl dwe, under penalty of perjury, that the fare9dtrg its true and corral. 8 Executed on NOV113ast ? i , at Cos Mesa Callfo ilea _. Signature PROOF OF PUBUCA'rION 'y . REOU FOR CITY � O� i�eACTION 4 Daft Nouamherr.2 3,, , l SOR r.Y...., to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submimd by. Paul Cook, City Administrator . P"WW by: Mike Achim, Acting Director, Community DOV61opme Mod: ARpRAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION ' S APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. 86• 11/U8R PEPRIT NO. 88-25/6UPPL aTAL RNVIRON- MENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 88-1 AND ENVIRON NTAL IMPACT REPORT itch. 6�1 SPRINGFIELD SOIL RECOVERY PROJECT 1 Cdt a�rtt Cour4ol Policy? 1%1 y" [ ] Now idly cw Exc"Ion it �� 50 im r%jot% q Stet of 1 . i 000rit owlstion, Anidyeh, Funding &mna, Altsn otirro Aa*m A BT11~ZEMRl�T OF Ira Transmitted for your consideration are appeals by- Councilwoman tirade Wi,nchell and the Concerned Citizens For Huntington Beach to the Planning Comission' s approval of Zone Change No. 88-•11 , Use Permit ► No. 68-25 , Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No . 58-1 and `t Environmental Impact Report No . 86-1. The zone change, use permit and envirormntal impact reports are entitlements for the Springfield tail Recover- ProJ ect which is proposed in the Oldtown Specific plan - District Z zoning district on tiro separate Mocks north of panms Avenue and wet . of Delaware Street . glannijLA.. C Mmisgion ReCC=Mndatjgn--and Ag-tion' n.,QgtoheI 18 1288 : E TES AN SECONDS BY SIL`TA TO M)OPT AND ?� A •�+}TIQN WAS MAD $'SC SLATES h II CERTIrZ SUPPLE AL MVIROUNWAL IMPACT RVORT NO. 88-1 AND ADOPT AND REC iTIFY ENVIR N1'AI. IMPACT REPORT RO. 86--1 KII`H STATMNT OF OVEIMIDING CONSIDERATIONS RY THS FOLLOWINC VOTE t ;a AYES: Slates, Silva, Leipzig# Bourguignon NOES: Livengood, Ortega 9 ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Rigg; s t A 140TION WAS MADE NT SLATES AND SE LADED BY SILVA TO APPROVE ZONE CHANGE no. 88- 1, AM USX PMWIT NO. 08 -25 WITH FIND1NG9 KID CONDIT IOE14 OF k •')ROYAL BY THR FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES : Slates, Silva, Leipzig, Bourguignon NOES: Livengood, Ortega ABSENT: None ABSTAIN : Higgins (thee Attac bment No. 1 for Findings and Conditions of Approval) I., y, 4 ,lotz 1 too • • Staff recom oft that the City Council deny the appeal and uphold the action of the Planning Comal.seton by taking the following actio.: a. Adopt and certify as oftguate Supplemental Environmental Impact Report So. 88-1 and adopt and recertify hs adequ2te ftvi romwntal x a, t Report No . ad -% by adoptinq City Council ltesclution etc. � with Statement of cOrerviding k Cona3de�catioc�c. ' ht,,rove ,'ono Change no. P3-11 with findings ard adopt lJordinance No. �_ and c, ,kpp;cve Use Pwrmit No. 88-25 batse4 .on, findings and conditions of approval and mitigation measures outlined in Attachment No. 1 with the following modified conditionm: Ob. Prior to any on-site construction or drilling, the mesonry wall, and all landscaping and street Improvwwnts shall to in"talled oUbject to the app*ova]. of the Department of Community D+r1►+Rlop wnt; , and Deport:m ant of Public works. However, COSS' tructiva of value, boxas may begin after street improvement construction has commenced W During the pre-drilling construction phase, ell heavy truck traffic shall be limitad to the use of dosignatred truck routes as approved by the Departmaut rf Public WorkS And in accord ith the Circulation Element of the general Plan. All heavy truck traffic during th6 drilling and the operation^1 phaso of the project shall by limited to the following streets between the e05 freeway and the site: Beach Sou 1-vard, Adams Avenue and Delaware Street. For eiitrence to trey site cnly Delaware Street, Springfield Avenue and California ''Street may be used. 37. VVon completion of all drilling operatic! 64# the dx illing structure shall big removed from the site. ig,aW ,Magus Petroleum Corp. 5772 Rolas Ave. * Ste. 210 ! fwotington Bosch, CA 92549 . I councilwoman draee Winchall Concerned Citizens For Huntington Beach R: Qldtown Specie..Lc plan - District 2 - Oil I Qerarel plan. Kedium Veno tv Residential AGIMA : 3 .1 antes (both blocks combined) Zone Change No . 88-11 is a request to rezone block A (,Tract 12747) and add the 0010 Suffix to allow the drilling of new oil wells . At 11t2x15f �� • ( 1589d) Y L -+.o 1 present , bate Hlocks A grad B ,ire currently xoaed to allow exic, Li tag oil operations . Block A tequix-es the "01" suffix to permit new oil W".L l.ti , U:.;r- Pur.,„it 'To . 68-25 is a request to establish a consolidated driil site and oil operation of both blocks . The project is locaLe4 within the boundaries of the Oldtown Specif.-.c Plu;i- District 2 which is a medium density res+den►,:6al district . Bcth Block A and B currently have the "O" a«ffix which permit: existing oil walls , oil facilities and oil storage operations . This project Complies with the requirements of tVe Oldtown Specific plan-- District 2 except for the exterior side yar6 setbacks . The applicant is requesting a reduction of ext:arior sideyards front tern ( la) feet to a minimum of seven (7) feet . y_J rgnm n:.A1 Progepaing Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (DSEIR) 88-1 was prepared to augment t:he analysis of the proposed Springfield Of 1 Recovery project undertaken in Environmental Impact- Report (FIR) R5-1 . EIR 86--1 was published and ::ertified as a Final EIR by the planning Commission in September 1986 . Subsequent to the certification of Final RIR 86-1 and approval of Zones Change No. 86- 4 and Use permit No . 85 -7 by the City Council on October 20, 1986 , litigation bz3ught against the City and ANGUS petroleum Corporation (Aa heal party in Interest) by the Concerned Citiaans of Huntington Beach, Inc. was settled by an agreement dated May 9 , 1988 . As part of the Settlement Agreement, the City Council ' s vote of October 20, 1986 by which :'Ual EIR 86-1 was certified, was set aside . Cn May 6, � )88, new Project applications were filed with the City. Those applications are for Zone Change No. 88-11 and Use Permit No . 88-25. Fallowing new project applications being filed with the City in May, 1988, the Department of Community Development determined that a cup►pl.emarat to the ezf sting SIR ('EIR 86-'1) should be prepared and circ+AYated in accord-Ante w; th CEQA requirements . The City serves as the Load Agency foi the CEQA review process as it did for they review proceae for 111 86-1 . In acco rdince W th the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) , D8XIR 08-1 and AIR 86-1 has gone through the following public notification and review process : Z Motice of Preparation posted , advnrtia72 and circulated June 1 - 1960 . 2. RotiCe of Completion of DSSIR 88-1 and EXR 86-1 posted, advertised, and circulatsd August 23 , 1988 . 8 . DSRIR 88-1 and ZIR 86-1 are available for public; review and cotnnt August 23, 1988 - October 7, 1988. , XCA 11121i l8 -"3- ( 1589d) cc• Mob a, 4 ,. COPles at D E19 8G-1 and EIR 86-1 forwarded to planning Commission and City Council members August 19 , 1988 . 5 . Pvbl.i c heA ing before Planning Commission to certify DSEIR BB-1 and recertify VR 86--1 comments and responses regarding WEIR 88--1 anu EIR 86-1 were distributed to Planning Commission In their packets , with the exception of a letter presented to the Planning Coimission on October 18 after public hearing , and area included as an appendix in tha Final EIR . QLAZI " mental Exty i r-iment e 1MrAaL..B_-5-lQI� N2,.....AIA�__Qn . E 'Ay i z o hrn ,QJ._1m2 a Q t_Re Po) t_Ng_, .1 -.i DSEIR 80-1 and EIR 86-1 wt. •a. prepared to analyze the potential impacts of the proposed Oi Rocovery project . The City Council. , as the final decisionmaker on tha pro-Ject, must adopt and certify as adequate DSEIR 88-1 and adopt and recertify as adequate EIR 86-1 prior to final action on Zone Change, No . 88--1.1 and Use Permit No . 88-186 The environmental impact rep(. rt discusses potential adverse impacts in the area of 1) Topography, ;oils and Geology, 2, Hydrology, Drainage and Water Qua. 1ty, 3 ) Oi.ological Resources, 4 ) Archaeological Resource€, 5) L4nd Use, Zoning and General plan, 6) Aesthatio$ , Light and Glare , 7) Traffic and Circulation* 8) Air � Qusllty, 9;. Noise, 10) Risk of Upset , 11) Public Services and Utilitimov , 12) Energy Conservation and 13 ) Cumulative Impacts . Through the use of appropriate mitigation measures identified in the VW xy the majority of the potentially adver3a impacts associated wiLh the project can be reduced to a level of insignificance. There are three sigmi f icant adverse impacts identified in the EIR' s which cannot be completely eliminated through mitigation measures . Thane impacts include : 1 . Saimmic Impacts : In the event of an earthquake of 8 . 0 magnitude or greeter . 2. &,8thatics•: Although mitigated with an 81 perimeter wall and lamdenaping, 16 .9. foot rigs will be clearly visible to residences for vp to two year8 . F, 30-foot high sound barrier will also temporarily impact the neighborhood . Tanka will be vialble above the retrimeter wall and landscaping. These views rartnot be elimimated. 3 . 21191Ls,,.2f_ Ugant - Zire: The risk of radiant teat from an oil tank fire is raze---a 1: 19, 000 to 1? 1, 000 # 004 chance of happening in one year. The risk was calculated using a worst Casein. scenario with trio perimeter wall and no mitigation. Wlt-h a Perimeter wall and facilities low&rad to 6 feet below grade, potential impacts can be reduced but not to an insignificant level . WA 11/21/188 �4-- (1589d) �....�Y�..�r10 I r� r, ' 4 } 1 ,Becau&a this f I:oject has been identifi .:d as having potentially significant adverse impacts which ean1.ot be mitigated to a level of insignificance, the City Council is iquired to crake a statement 0 orverriding considerations prior to approval of the project . In this statQmee>ntr , the City council must find that the econondc and social benefits of the proposed project; outweigh the project ' s potentially adverse impacts . A Statement of Overriding Considerations is attached to this report . It should be noted that staff recommends adoption e+ all. mit.igir -Aon measures suggested in thu EIR' s . Removal of any of then reacuixnc::lded mitigation measures resulting in an alteration of the conclusions of the EIR ' s would require recirculation of the document . Rgag lea to The appeal letters received by staff (sae Attaclune3nts 6 and 7) stage I that Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Fo . 88-1 (SEIR 88-1) and Envirormsental Impact Report Wo . 86-1 (EIR 86-3.) are inade3guatee and that they mitigation measures do not offer the existing neighborhood adequate protection from a proposed industrial use in j close proximity to residential land use. i Furtber, the appeal letter from the Concerned Citizen for Huntington Beach rttateas that individual citizen-lot owners have every right to enforce the Covenant,s, Conditions and Restrictions recorded on their tract. The Springfield oil Reacoveary, Project wi.l; result in a degradation of their residential neighborhood and that the total number of conditions will never be entirely complied with or enforced by the City. The following discussion addresses Councilwoman Winchell ' x appeal : As listed previously in this report, :13 separate categories of impacts wears discussed at length in EIR 86-1 and DSEIR 88-1. The 211t`s address potentially significant advernes environmental impacts associated with the project , identify those impacts which can be reduced to a level of insignificance through mitigation ri-easures , specify thews mitigation measures and, finally, identify those Impacts which cannot be .reduced to a level of insignificance. The EIR' s provide mitigation meassures which address neighborhood eanviroamutal concerns . The prapos*d sprint field Oil Recovery Project will consolidates a�pproximately. 31 scattered, anticipated oil wells and tank facilities into one states-of-the t ;t production facility. it i3 staff 's conclusion that removal of ' the existing anticipated facilities and replacemdnt of them with state-of-the art, safety designod faerVAtieis will result in Lhea improved safety and general, wolfar'e of the neighborhood . The following is an Item-by-item response to the Concerned Citiseeno v for Hr.)ntington Beach appeal ; WA 11/31/88 (1589d) •.ter 1 ^. me sly o�_ r�tgr��...�� 8!a�stirtr re�iG�l�i�1 The processing and completion of both GSEIR 88-1 and EIR 86--1 have been in compliance with Califurnia Environmental Quality Act Guidelines , Thirteen categories of impacts and ten alternatives were analyzed within the documents, and cvo,er fifty ir_iti.gation measures suggested . The majority of potentially adverse environmental impacts were reduced , t;irough mitigation measures, to a level of inFignificance , These significant unavoidable adverse impacts wore identified . In 1986, EIR 86--1 was certified and adopted as adequate by both the Planning Commission and the City Council. . On October 18, 1988, the current Planning Commission adopted and recertified EIR 66-1 and adopted acid certified as adequate r)SEIR 88-1 . It is staff ' s conclusion that EIR 803-1 and DSEIR 88-1 are adequata and that the basic: purposes of the California Environmental 1 Quality Act are served through them. 1 The intensitg► 12f,.,.t1lotoil„ cpgrationIs gn indugtria1 use that does not ccnforM to the !Oenergl PIan,. As stated in Zone Change No . 88-11, finding number 3 .c . *A General Plan Amendment is not required because the combined acreage of the proposed site is less that 20 acres as not forth in tho Size Criteria for Determining Land Use Oasignations table contained in the General Plan. " The City' s General Plan sets for minimum si.:S areas for various j land use designations which establish thre3hold values for the necessity for General Plan Amendments . The combined acreage of 3 . 1 acres for the proposed ail recovery site is � substantially legs than 20 acres; therefore, a 3eneral Plan Amendment is not required. Also, the General Plan/Zoning consistency matrix identifies that the "al" suffix in consistent with mediuim density residential land use designations and zoning districts . Combining the `al" suffix with the Oldtown Specific Plan - District 2 coning district is ccnsistent with the General Plan. The 0010 suffix allows for the killing of new wells and the operation of ail production within the City . Angus Petroleum Corporation is requesting a xcme change on Block A (Tract 12747) in order to consolidate approzim&tely 31 azistirig 1 scattered wells within the mediate area . WA 11/21/88 (1589d) �r r • Indi ldu 1 -citizen-!U c Qw n e r s have XQ i_Y..�]St�7`�L' based on an inter-department communication f.roni the City Attorney' s Office to the planning Division dated August 26, 1986, the applicant has the right to pursue: their petition for a zone change and use permit for the required entitlements to initiate the drilling of new wells and the construction of the Springfield Oil Recovery Pzojeet . D. Tbe_c ull-Ar"O.' n3 subJeCted tQ the degradatign of thBi-r. TABidlentia1 _n_JSihbAchoQd by i-ld.Us. LUfiQ5s. The applicant is atteopting to consolidate approximately 31 scattered oil operatioi,Q into a consolidated sits . The oil production facilities already exist in the vicinity of the proposed 2 block site . in tortes of fire safety and multiply land nse impacts , staff su1.rorts the oil consolidation I project . The mitigation measures included in SEIR 09-1 and EIR 86-1 and the Conditions of Approval required by Use Permit fio . 38-25 will provide safety and land use measures which will prevent the degradation of the existing reiiidential neighborhood. After the initial construction and two year drilling phase, the operation will become: a passive operation with the occasional maintenance of the wel1L . There are exiWng sites withi'n the City where there are multiple well operations with storage facilities which are adjacent to � resideni6.i.el areea . E. Tl $ 57 or 60 cond rkg an the_.-.oil 4ril-ling Vermltrk wJJJ neve: bA_ entirely- Met Qr enfor-ca�_p,�,�.t,.��t?erien�s�.wLt the AUM AW - - , Oil, ham already provsn to the Concerned Citizens fox Miltinaton ._lea hr With the inclusion of the suggested mitigation measures as conditions of approval for the proposed project, the api li.cant is required by law to comply with the conditiona . In ad64tion, the recent passage of Assembly Bill 3180 by the California Legislature requires that putlic agencies adopt a reporting and monitoring program for adopted measures designed to avoid significant environmental impacts. As well as being a requirement, ,it is the intent of the City of Huntingtor. Beech and the purposes of the City' s Code Enforcement Division to enforce adopted conditions of approval . BEIR 88-1 was prepared as of supplement to the previously prepared SIR 8e-1 which were prepared to assess tre envir+onmeriwal impacts relItive to gone Chenge No . 88--11 and Use Permit No. 6" -25 . UNIR 88--1 and EIR 86 -1 represent a fietafled analysis of the project , protect-reloteed impacts, alternatives and mitigation Mearures lntenOed to minimizes adverse environmental impacts , Prior to any WA - 11./21/88 i7- ( 15896) �7 r r action oil Zor.o Chnnga No . 88--11 and Else Permit No. 68-25 , it is neresebry that. the City Council certify as adequate SEIR 88-1 and EIR 86-1 . All suggested mitigation measures recommended in SEIR 88-1 and EIR 86-1 have been inc,orporaLed into conditions of approval . On October 18 , 1988 , the Planning Cotmnissiov approved and recommended to the City Councc12 certification of SEIR 88-1 and recertification of EIR 86-1 . I13 S(l!m=: Not applicable . The City Council may overturn the Planning Commission ' s decision and deny Zone Change No . 88-11 and Use Permit No . 86-25 with findings . AT'�ACHMRpT�: I. City Council Resolution No . which Includes Statement of Overriding Considerations 2 . Final E°'xR 88-1 - and E.,R 86-1 3 . Planning Commission Resolution No. 1487 with Statement of � overriding Cor.sideration% � ` 4 , Findings and Conditions of Approval for zone Change No. 88-11 and Use Permit No. 88--25 as approved by Planning Commission on October 18 , 1988 . 5 . Zone Change ordinance No . -6 . Appeal letter from concerned Citizens for Huntington Beach dated October 26, 1988 . I .,7 . Appeal letter from Councilwoman Grace Wincnell dated 3ctober j 27, 1988 . -8 . Draft Minutes from October 18 , 1988 Planting Commission meeting. -9 . Planuinq Commission Staff keport for ?)SEIR 88--1 and EIR 86-1 dated October 1.8, 1988 ,14 . Planning Commission Staff Report ft-r ZC 88-11/UP 88-25 dated October 18, 1989 . MA:RLF:gbm I (1589d) c sra e I 07 CONCERNED CITIZENS FAD NTINGTON REACH l4q%Tt ` 55 9 Alsuna Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92648 October ;6, 1988 Honorable Mayor John Erakine C/O City Clerk, Connie Brockway P.O. box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mayor Erskine: BE: Planning Commission Denisions on tha Springfield Oil Recovery Project, October 18 th Concerned! Citizens For Huntington Reach, a non-profit corporation , wishes to, appeal, the following decisions: �I C-Ua - To adopt and certify an adequate Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 88-1 and EIR No. 86-1 by adopting Resolution No. 1402 with Statement of Overriding Considerations, C-4b - (1) Approve and recomm- that the Gity Council Adopt Zone Change o. 8 N 8 11. (2) Approve use Permit No. 88--25 , Concerned Citizens are appealing for the following reasons: A. The accepted SEIA's are Inadequate, for all reasons stated In our pr1or letters and our consultants, The Chambers Group, S. The Intensity of the oil operation is an Industrial use that does not conform with the General Plan. C. Individual citizen-lot owners have every right to enrorce their CC&A's recorded February 21 ; 1978 in Official Record of Orange County. D. The citizens are being subjected to the degradation oft-heir residential neighborhood by industrial uses. E. The V on 60 conditions for oil drilling permits will never be entirely not or entirely enforced as past experiences with the applicant, Angus 011, has already proved to us. We will appreciate your kind and fair attentions to our appeal. Vory Truly yours, Ma P h, Treasurer d Abrapa S Lary se e, ea e cc., John Murdock, Attorney CONCERNED CITIZENS FOR John Mestermier, CHAMBERS GROUP HUNTINGTON BEACH r CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION • to Honorable Mayor, City Council FRQm0raca luc. Hembers 4 Connie Brockway, City Clerh COUVICHWOMP it�ad��T APPEAL OF PLANNING C(%%WISSION RATE October27, 1999 ACCIOW ON EIR 85-4., ZC SS-I 1 , AND ITY $8-25 I hereby t a —Al Ac 3�eai ing before the City Council of the above application. I chall ent a I'letnn Commission's cartifinAtion of EIR 8", Zone Change No. 98-11, and USa Permit No, ZS for the fol'owing reams: The mitigation meaa,m Wentifted in the Environmental Impact Report and related catuRtkme on the Use Permit do not offer the neighborhood adequate protection or dreli all of the coacom prosented with an expanded industrial use project in an astablIAW raWdential ne4A i�hba�r•hood. 1548d ' 'c GW= , v Joe h a., y o►w RECEIVED I �i f't Ct£ftK nC 043US pelrofeum Corporation 5172 Solis Avenue NOV 18 I l ?3 ►ill UU 3u;1e DO Huntington Beach, California 92649 (714) B94.3533 November 17, 1988 Mayor John Eyakine Mayor Pro Tea Toni Maya ir. Was bannister Me. Ruth Finley Dr. Peter Green Mr. .lack Kelly Me, Grace Winchell City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Strf•:w t Huntington beach, CA 92648 F Re: ANOIS Petroleum Qo . gonsolidatign zKOW (Zone Mau A§-11, gn Permit 88-25 Ajrd U& 86_1) Doar Mayor Erskin and Members of the City Council.: s j ANGUS Petroleum Corporation is the applicant for an coil recovery project i ("Project") Which will produce approximately nine million barrels of oil from the 160 acre Springfield Unit. This letter is intended to supply the City Council with additional information regarding issues which have been raised by the public during the preparation of the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report ("SET ") for the Project ("Project") . 1. • Proms Sa.,fetX Cgnargd = '- '-Ir4 Bondi The Project Area, as defined in the SEll1 to include the 160 acres of the subsurface oil unit, contains 22 wells along with 7 associated tank batteries. Note of the tank batteries are equipped vith vapor recovery sywtras. Most aro open to the atmosphere allowing gas and vapors to escape. Pone of the batteries have more than the most rudimentary fire fighting equipmut. Produced water is dumped into the sewers off of than rash tanks or "gun barrels" without Concern for vapor containment and adding to the volume of fluid that the city sewers must handle, i Pumping wells that are equipped with rod pk%mping equipment all have mesa* leaks around the ,stuffing boxes. Since these wells are low volume and do not require constant attention, many leaks go unnoticed for saivaral hours and maybe even days . The wells all, have cellars which co-,gain soap exude oil usually floating on top of some water. These always present: :aafae danger of overflowing during, heavy rains A11 •even of tho t wnk batteries will be replaced by new tankage ecuippod with strata of the art fire suppression and vapor recovery ,. ;.,,agvipment. Produced water will be vetered, filtered and fa-injected 1 Ohm r AWU5; Peboleum corporak n City Council letter NoverAbor 17 , 1988 Into, the undergr::und nil rewervoir y The wells will be replaced with new wells equipped with new -,sell heads and will. be produced using submersible electric pumps . NotW ng move-4 thvough the well head once the pumping equipment has bear. installed so that leaks are kept to an absoluta minimum. The old cellars will be replaced with trench type cellars containing well heads on 8 foot canters 9 feast billow ground level. Since an oper,.tor must enter these callFrs once a shift, they will be kept pwnped down and clean. This will be easy to do since each cellar will be equi.pp.-,d with sump pump that will pwnp any rain water or other :-.quid into the clean-up system and be re-injected or sold with the produced oil. 'Thc present systems require that a vacuum truck be used to pull down the liquid in the cellars. This is uoth expensive and unhandy, 'which are reasons for not doing it frequently. Moth the existing wells and the tank batteries are in close proximity to dwellings . Some are less than 20 feet from homes or condominiums . The most obvious case to site are the five wells located in the Villa St, Croix condominium complex. The new fmcilities and wells will be separated from dwellings by public :streets ; surrounded by block walls and landscaping. The wells will be located under ground in trennh cellars . A far safer circumstance than now exists . f All of the existLig wells are connecter.- to their tank batteries by means of buried pipelines . Many of these lines are old and their exact location is unknown. They will be replaced by pipelines that are in conduits under the cornar of Springfield Avenue and Huntington Street or hung on the cellar walls where if a leak does occur, it can bd found and repaired easily and quickly. It has been estimated that some 18 ,000 feat of pipeline will be abandoned by the Springfield Project; a great reduction in the potential for loaks. 2 loxico gJ"I Imnacts Attachment 1 to this letter contains the testimony of Dr. Edward T. Helton regar•]ing the to.,Icological impacts of the Project. This testimony was presented orally before the City Council on October 20, 1986; On November 9, .1988, Dr, Balton confimed by telephone that his testimony has not changer' since that time. Dr. Helton's Curriculum Vitae is also attached, His testimony concludes that the Project will not result in any acute or chronic human health at,acts from hydrocarbon fumes. 3 . - gtrltgj r a.1 Intg&ritw Ind 191pitil ,f JWJ As stated in the SBIR, the Project will be engineered to withstand an earthquake of M8 on the Richter Scale. Attachment 2 sets forth the specificatiot'.s which must be followed in the construction of the tanks . 4. - Qgns staM KM Hotinaton Beagh Olngril LUQ j" Lffid I Fol is LU Attachment 3 consists of +► sumazy of "01" iil sites Sri residential Page 1 1 Ir � by e ANGUS Ntrolatot ii Ce4.v'�allon City cour:cil Letter Nol?embux 17 , 1988 areas in the City. This attackument shows clearly that. the Project i.4 i)#:t °Iuniqu®" in locating oil drilling fecil.itte:s in a residential rsalghborhond. 5 . - Huntingtpm Agsc)lJC+qrkYZMJU A. !-A The witty of Huntington Beach Department of Developmini Services , Planning Division prepared a series of raparts relating to enerKy issues in 1981 . Attachment G consists of Report No. 1 , "Preserving Surf-act! Access to Underground Oil Reserves in Developed .tress" and Report Ns. 2, "Piscal rmpacr of Oil Operations in Huntington Aditch ." These reports set forth the City's strong pcitc,y to support oil consolidttion projects and stutvmeriae a number of the advantages of these projects, As Noted on page 15 of Report No , 1, which describes the advantages of unitization , unitization is a more efficient- production tochnique which increases the total vole of oil recovered and decreases the Came it takes tv produce that oil, The report also concludes , however. that tha land use advantages of unitization are +squally important. Because new walls can be consolidated into walled and landscaped islands, and existing wells which ara trot important to the injection pattern may be plugged and abandoned, unitization is a benoficial tool for aestbatically impxo,►ing oil field operations And eliwinoting deserted, idle or unneeded wells. If your have any additional questions regarding the Project, or requirQ ., additional information regarding any aspect of the Project , please � contact me Van truly yours, 1 �����riw�"r�'�r'R�"4 Jahn D. �errtichael Vices President Page 3 t S ATEMEM OF DR .ZDNVAFX D. HELTt7N TO THE HUNIMNOTON BRA,ryH CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 200 1986 "Mayor Mandi.c, Councilmambers : I'm a professional scieistiots and toxi%oologist. I' m Director of the Division of Occupational Human Toxicology at Saint Francis Memorial Hospital . I was asked by ANGUS petroleum to roview the situation vith regards to the toxicological perspective. aunt to give you a little perspective can myself, 1"ve been a pcofessionatl chemist and scientists at the, National "Tox" (Toxicological) Center, Albany Htdical SChovl, New Mexico State Gnivorsit Yr the F.D.,A. , New Mexico Stage, etc . In doing this, Terre reviewed the EIR, associated documents regarding omissions, etc. I made a site visit I last week. I looked at the frci.li.ty. I spent some time speaking with the professional staff of ANGUS Petroleum reyxrding the technology invol-red and the chemical nature of this particula&� crude oil . I think the most important thing to say here is that we are dealing with crude oil . Ae know a great deal about crude oil toxicology. We know that it has a limited toxicity because of its great viscosity. In addition to this, we know that crude oils have this toxicology with regards to the type of crude. In this particular case, it" >s a a►sphaltini c crude . It doesn•t have high hydrocarbon emission. The major hydrocarbon which comes from this crude is methane, ItO s abaust 95 percent, about a percent ethane. Mlaetha<na, more than any other, is an asphyyxiant, it will. suffocate you, as opposed to the rieurotoxio effects of hydrocarbons that have much higher molecular weights . Looking at this project, looking at the fact that the project will reduces the esaissions through vapor capture systreaas by 93 percent and looking at the quantities that would be expected to be released from this system on a► yearly r%tsias, I Mould not, profeassionally, expect there to be any acute or chronic human health ,effects from th^ hydrocarbon fumes. Thank you. " k �r`1MI L LM Y1 Nam a E-J"ar d Da l er Halton OWNS j"ne 11.'s :Y45 MAR!TAL STATICS r Marr i sd, Wife y- Joan C�41LD Ne Daughterr a El i ss Holland, Hawn August 13„ 1973 Jxon, Jacab Edwwdq PAwn aanuory 299 1979 ADDRJll3fsta Division of Occupational and Human Tcm i wrol ogy Center -for fiarhebt l itati on and Occupationat Health St. Francis Pw,wrorial Hospital 900 Hyde 6treo t Son Francisco, CA 94109 TS1.JU*CW. t 41 S a 775-17b2 (Work) i 4&5 f 997-1043 iHkt O y EDUCATION, Sa A« Chemistry, 0&? -- Texas Tech Un i veroi t y Lubbock q TX M.A. Hiology, 19499 The Collega of William and Mary, Mi 1l i amsburg, VA Ph.D. Biological Scia"coo - (Diachentstryg Cellular Phy%iology and Endocrinology ) - 1972, University o4 California, Santa Barbara, CA Postdsactoral , WIN Pastdoctorwl Peel l oM, August 1972 to "arch 1 T73, Steroi l bi ochewf stt•y, Norcester Foundation +or "pwria+wrotal Siol.ogy, Shrewsbury, MA 1954 Jftrclhl - Director lhrrri►�Irt t Vi vi si ran of Occupat i oval and Human Toxicology Cooter for Rehabilitatian and Occupationni Health and 14Wital Pk-afesslanal Dtaff rhmft r fit. Francis 14swor i al Hospital son Francisco, CA 94109 1900 1"k4 President, Si a-ftwto" rtrrswch j Inc. dui or ,Vice-Frost dent for Tox i col ogy (Jan a 1992 - ftte 1 t) Director of T'axicotogy (Dec. 19M - Dar., 19d1 i Las ter-wes, M ONC43 and Salida;. CC 61201 Y�Y .r V Pardo 2 Of 16 iRACKGROUND Montt ntA&d ) 1'i ;'9 1904 itessar-=h Aasaei aCa Fir*104scn• of ,foci &QI OQ ' Associate Pro-fassar of UIRMAUtry Coordi naear , Sr aduatt: rox i_•ol oqy Program Z( ct. A"2 - 1094) Now AMs •i ca £tate Law Cruceas Chi +ef $ Di vi st ion of Biochemical Toxicology., Associ Arta Prof-wmocw of TaaRICOlopy i�Ml1'afFriee.�,:ae Rommarch Inst+tuts and The Internati anal CAnter for Envi ra;imental studios, tnsta tutor fcr` cemp►arati vM anO human Toxieblrgy, Plhany hwdic3l School , Rl kanv y NY (Nov 1977 Uac 1981 ) I 1978 - 1979 Ol reiector, Department of ;..;hiRmI str•y BioltQi c SS40ty 1*Yn$u AUCOn lDl Vi Ni On Uttar Dianoties, tnc. Kaan�ti A�tt�N'e� �'�� 2n79:3 I 1976 1978 Director , Drug Rowearch and Evaluation Propram (May - &Mtemberr ME) Seani :�r Research Chemist (March 1976 - gMov 1978) Natidna. Center far Toxicciogical Reeewarch Fo,id a,;d Truo Administration I Jefferson , AR 72079 Assistant Prefaasor of Phorexacol oqy and Pediatrics (AdJunct.) t.nivortity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Li ttxo Rack. AR 72201 t97:5 1976 ChAwf r Clinical leswarc:h Caatai ri, U.i. Army Brooke Arey i cal .'eltnt*r Can A rAonloa TX AswI b'%.W! S. Prafessar of Sa wrNetmi stry (Adjunct) Department of Allied 1hmlth &nd Life ikietnca s Univarwity of T*xA* pan Antnnioa TX 1974 1976 1` A-sa cl ate Pei widatlan 5ci anti of (Adjunct ) *outhtmat VwMstlm #nr Mmw+we»`n and Education r ran Antnnioa 'rX 1973 Di rector, Cl i wit eat 1 asmarch Laboratory captain's ".So Ar ..y Brooke Ar" iwrdical Cantor �:aA Ant(X%,4 0.1 tX �.M IE D D. WL TON I Fago 3 W � ti P1Rf EUs +04a; f a V Pf-F it ; �'�.. �.��r 'N°.,���rx 1 . „.:� t. f ...f. X '1�• �_r r if"' 1„! d �i�1��':i•' C i• 1', '' t.� n 14+ %;04 n ! t 1 4ax - t rx;AJ t'Wr t3,*f ua an :". ompar-at.i ve Endo- c1 � rlalLgK y. is-onf M CA4, da . w IaroV� 17. 15y7 (S71 i *%K t 14 y r 7;,Atk,. l t; , + r' a Maw won a 1 �arl.<�e�;��.t°. tangy� ..for'a4��•:��s� �� .! �q �►+ Ks fit` +, . ;,Q a . s� r !rwh+, � '.:� , i 9`° Im•xle�! crap-mr , Z*; r' 1-4irml4r) Wationial Camtar for To>x1c4jliwQjrP1 Ro mauw-ct'z 1Rarssarc h 6yaposi Rr,m 15-179 IV?b. „ �.,, ►t to that Wr(vav a3 ,: Foods ifira Ni trofurane, � �'1 err M..Ji yam, 197 �.r 'F vs«ai on Chair-sp sn ,anti Invited Pap"r-r At,, fan-sual National Corrt or* for Toxicological Rvowerch.'F w-mon: Research Sympntet ura, "_f ttic, Rack , AR, L-1,R•Ober 24--;?6, 197 7. i Ex pert Wits*-R c t rrx cl and Drug; Admi n i%tr•ati on - Di athy'i st j l bws.tt*Ql !wiring+ , Hockvl ,lle, P101 January 12, 1977. Invited 5p*sk*1r• , Scx-don RancAs►r0l Ctrrafaratics; on Ei wi,rjr onm rntarl wid Kati c Tour i.cc+ugy, Plymouth, HH, June 26-30 a 1974. Invited Speaker , Nati coal In sti auto of occupa•tl emal Final `h and 6440ty - Iicwkohop w Estror ansc i,n t,h* Envi r ta' .mwnt , Cincinnati , Mia, F ebru&ry '? -101 11Y7Bti Xnv1tow►d Spdsxk&a r , Annual Meting o4 that Association of Offic,lal, An"iytical Chowist.a, Sari Francisco. CA, May 6-7, 1979. Sosasim Chbirsan,, Gordon Ffos tarc:ti con-jwrernc• of Toxicology and Safarty 1EYa1ua't1c,wj rNwiden, Ni, July 34--August 3, ig7q. Consultant to the LPJOHN Co. , January-March , 1960. Invited Speaker, Departawnt of Dh owi ystry, N*w P%x i co St ate Uni wows1 t.y, Las Crucase, NM, Nuvw b er 15s 1960. ,Invited Speaker, Senentech C.orpocrativn, So. San Francisco , CA, April 20, 1981. , A y 1 1 1 EE%NW D D. HELTON g PH,. r`. Page 4 W AA iPROF'E6S8 X CNAAL ," "t%J 1 T 1 ES K 4 Can t i ri uerra? Clan Li/1 taolt tO '3N Corporation on and Bakcr and Hostetler , Ci evv1 e.nd d Consesal t•rit to U.S. tc.a j Care r-pu rakt i o+i , 19100--'.994. Inivi terd L acltur ar ,, Northwost E:ent atr for roadi c a'S E"JUcati 0fI g Yrldi ana Onl versi ty c ,.aca1 of K idi,r.A re, fi*ptombarr 21P, 1961 . C'.;Pns4ultant to tim Ani+mi Health lostiE.uta44 1901 to prosant. Bci amt i f J c Advisory board *svmber- 1. Asphalt Roofing Manufacturers ' Amsoc i at.l ao t 19PO I -- pr•wmwnk . irAvi tmd Sperkarr-, facc:i arty of T ox 0 cnXr-gy✓Airsri ran Govieyty of "ar laa- cuilogy and Expwrim*ntaal. Itterr,a oarutics , &tqust 1182, Louis- ville, KY. Tnyt. t4d Speaker .,,Ac :icing Law Xnvtlt:utwj 'am York City. Sept . 10. 1 1 , 1982. I Jnvi t and Spomkerr, San Francisco Symposium or) OLcupationai Disease L.itigaatic"wt Sari F'ranciwc a, ticttabor 15--16, 1902 , tnvi twd Speaker-, Practicing Las-4 Insti tut:e$ NYC, 4- 59 19S3. lnyi +teed 1kovmkvr-, Induottri sl Claims Association, March 27, 1984. Invited Bpmaker,. Northern California EVr.opmti onasl Health Centeer „ Uryt yersity of California, Can Ftranscl sac al San Fr'afncloca General Health Cent'..er r April 11 .r 1984. Invited peabetr D St . r�a►cici� 4 rcaria] tio�,p" t&I iducreiing Education ar•tmeint, Jun* 29, 1?84. Invited 4mokwi:c-, KQED Medical Radio Flragrsm •- House Call- Tominse In the Envi ronsraaint v June 10, 1984. Xnvi tc J Speaker a Nat! onal Canterance of Adam ni stiriwti R,e Lase Judges/ Departoont of Labor , Ocean City, MV, Septe et.ar 11 , 1184. Invited 8piaakor* Rphabi l i tati un lndusitr 1 al Nursing group, South Ban F'rancissco$ CA, October 1 $ 1994. F , n; FVAA D V. HELTON, PH.D. ra 1e s of 16 PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIESi (Crnti,n!.A&d) Invited Spooker ,, Iri wrnAtiunAl El *c.t,r icaal It Electronic 'Enginwering Sor,fet.y, Toxicolorgy in than ��).oc.tronir.% Industry , FAla Alto , October 16, IY64. lrivi ted Spea kerr~r MLDar*#ott, Will 6 Emory, 'Toxicology ! i nar r Dece aber 14 y 1984, Chicago, 1 .11 i nai s. Psl.aul t.y 0*r. d:a ) 1 tarn+ 4`-ter. i i �y► of Trfiq.2 •t.r � 0 �",M 1i cinr T.10 surgery, December 26% IV'84 - Ja►cuary 2,4 1705 , Maui * Hawaii . Invited Speaker-, Defense Lawyarra ' Association , February A, 29Wq Sari Franc!uut, CA. Invited Speaker, Intarnational Electrical 6 Electronic Engineering We i ety, Toxicology in the El octrarii ce Industry„ Pal n Alta„ CA, May 16, 19133. �I Invited Speaker, Industrial Claims Aasociat! on t Mamical 'Toxins WCwkshap, Sara Fr'anciscot C:At June tat 1985. Invited Speakers Unlversity of Cali4arnia, San Fc+isnc:isc+a, Toxi- cology Semi nar , Juno 19, 1985. Invi,teo : ,-maker * Bay Area Onca�j ogy Nursing Scalaty, DES, S*n Franciwcov CA, .lung 27, 1985. Invited Speaker l Saint. Francis 14amor-i w1 Haspi tal , G,vt03 c9y committee Tumor Conf orence, DESq Ek%n Frainei scor CA, aui y 2.�, �4es. Invited Spookerti Labor 6 FmpYoyawnt Law Program, Drug Screening and Abuse In Industry, February 27, 191361 93&"ta Cruz,' CA. Invited oskar Living 6 Working Around Rotenti x.a 1 y Toxic Substances - Health Considerations, Son Jose Chamber of Ceawserce and Santa Clara Valley Wer l d Trade Association, San Joss, CA, April 29, 1996. ww i 1+• EDWARD 0. NEJ.toW a �:'�1. D. Paper 4 of i& . 0S AND t •1','',��Th NOtt"naxl institutes of I+Y4,.I th "'-,std0Ct0r•Ai FV1l0W* J972-197N. BrOolke Aral+ i'lQOLar Cwntarr ft*. 4rch Want L;-275. 1ho Human Hspstl c La YA-tM Metaiabnl ixx of the OyAthst is aad Nat.urAl Cistragens r 1974-117 6. PWritoriouo Sarv,iCw Nadal -- United gt:at*z ate"Dalyr 1976. RILSEA&CM ASILI7ICI-it 1 . Drug &red ZwnoOl art i c purl 4 i cation and identification ao StphAdox 1" H - V;r0maituyrrphy b. High Porforaaance Liquid Chromatography c. fiae-Li qui d Chromatography 2« Gyntheai s of stwraai d conjugrtrws and +dereri,voti ve %. 3. Rawdi at eotopre tachnal ogyr and thowcwy. 4. Human , sub--human primate and rodent metabolic and trans- placental phaxraacok i nest i e studiow . D. La and Ltd YID t*st i nq ano oer-hani sows c4 drug t.ax i c i t-p,. 6. Mass apectrorptryr. 7* Muclelc acid purification and rrealy�c . . Do L1 Y.1. 3 a wtabol i c ate.rdi os. 9- Steroid redi ci asmuncaessay. �D. Drum and chami carl arjimmi safety tvatinq and toxicology, llocloty of Toxicology The Endoc r-i ne Society American Association for Clinical Chemistry Awortcan Chwani r.a►1 society MW York Academy of sc i e>rntes 90t i Oty Of Ecotax i c al egy► arhd Environmental onmentar<l Safety ADVITIUMAL APPDINTMENTSe Edi for g Journal of App l i end Toxicology aAfflliaRtew Toxicologist California Primate kesoaarch Center University of California DaMvi c•. calif rni aM Staff Tox i calngi Ott Reaidicarrer (Galiifnrteta lnduvtrial ftdicawl Clinic) Gan Prone.i s►co, CA tip p. WELTON 9 RNa�r BAJ I C RESEARCH AND Cd,Jd'MRC I AL F XPER I E'► LE r L3 DORA'T`URV CHEMICAL STUDY dil�� NaCf� ecyr`ti►c�rmt+err re apteat%pi i sm/phar-m6cokinatics National Scl enco FoundatiaM al dostor~a n e mot:abol i sm/phar-m,,%c:aki not C.0 Hst i onal Science FOUndat i an i q-nar protrest i n Lft XUM aK i dat i on Nat i wal Institutes of Health , Norcarstwr F►yurodat i on f 0t IEN- porimental Biology 17a -ethynylastrodial World Health s fid awatrenal awtabol i sm/phaar mac:ok i nret i cs organization di;tCMylstilb&%trol metabolism/pharm,ecakin+etics Food and Drug Admin- a►nd aestra,di cal taxi tol agy/teratol opy i strat i on aetarti• onh+eht+er j, Mitt a stabol i sm and ARCO Chrtmi call Inc. anal yt i cal chaal sdryr prq anophasphatV BLP Chemi Atl,y Mobil oil Corp. analgresi r. J31._P ChvAi str-y Endo/E. T . DuPont Corp plasticixrrr GLP Chemistry CTFA f 1 avor anhanc er s BLP chemistry Fu' MA d bromide fumi Ant rRfi riuw 41141 y5i s $root Lakes Chemical s di urat! -: pharmocokineti cad Merrell National Labs Nha►r wacod yr;ainl co ax insect ropol l ent dermal absorption .(S.C. John 'snson Mo excretion (S.C. �ohnsan dk $an1 rirtrensi ve pharmaccl a i cal Ci ba Boi ly �ntihyp � aq4m. t arw omat i c sari tree ph ar rook i not i e is Eel. Durant be pharmacodynami cs Cc. ophthaloic r0plae*- pharO&COdcinartics/ CIL= Corp. 1Rint fluid ph&rmmc0dyn^mi e s I r I r KOW D. NI:LTONJ PH. Ds Page a of 16 DAS1C RESEARCH AND COM"ERCiAL. FXPF:R� nund? art M ci a l arwwatner toK i col ogy and L&l cr ,i o Cnntr-nl Vo yen Lawry A' ntak* Cow sc t 1 r Piersj co cosmetics/skin tv,re taxicology studies Bic-Pharma Corp i+ treatment products Anar-i can Cyanamid& ant i-herpet i c drug FDA RegJ strat i on u. s. $oi 1 Corp b: o-rawti oral powt i ePA Regi etr•at i on U. S. Sail Corp cide caramel color phsrearoki riot i cs CarAmol Cocicon� pharmacodynami cs traste Council food, drug and ondocrino tow i ri ty CCMA cosmetic color Rod No. 3 psycheacti ve pr i mnta toxicology IDEA Corporation drug sub-atcute anti--andr"an FDA Rt yl strati on Maental Pharrma - toxiecology & vndocrine cowtical ova 1 ustf ors dermal UV biochemical owchaniom Aarer-ican Cyanamide screening &gento anti -herpetic FDA Rogisitrat i on Suvran Pharr mscou_. drug toxicology evaluation t i cal bl o-engi neerrd FDA Root strut i on ®i o-Technol ogy en2ymaess & hormtar:ss safety b toxicology General Corp. *valuation red phosphorus chemistry and U.6v Army, perch aroathone inhalation toxicology Fart Di ntr i c k , MD PAC Cal are 9LV' Chemi str f CTFA rod Me. 9127,3b collul r implants 044ety evaluation Harr& Biologics eulfanamide regulatory evasluAtion Animal Health antibiotics Institute gyp•'' 1 PT h • t �Q� D D. HELTON •D■ page 9 bf 16 Cf,)P RC IAA. E xPL.'ri m-wi,—, C NSULTlM dte rseieer�tat,i l:asa CM"1 CAS. STUDY SPIONSOR synthetic pr•ogetstin health of deects/huanan ;IpJahin satf ety fungicidn and U). Yj-YV toxicity ronsLiltation f eat$ add i t i ve Asphalt ci.ncwr Asphalt Roofing Maanuf acturar "a Assoc. antibiotic tow tcityrragisltr•atsan Terh Am*r°ic:aN antibiotic tOxiC0109y study man1 (tar Animal Health Institute ant.ibl oti c FbA regulation ation tlaurry Biological Asphalt , coal tar cancer tons�;ltatitar� sabeestoa q du t tannins &no dyes caeicer • Tanner s Council of Astor i ca i; Homes Leather Co. , I rzc. Placental extracts efficacy Via--pharea methyl broaide human nsauropathi er; consultation vinyl chloride, hkkman cancorr, l emkxmi a Mob1l it BAR pal yurethane, ani l i news b i sacyana,1 ers aaeronI a fuses respiratory di se. gn consultation petroc.herai cal #~a human cancer consul tat ion L betizeene f ueee and chemical NI O M site Visit, Hewers Leathoor Co. armatic Doings bladder cancer N109 d/Synal lay Corp. vinyl products neurapathi es/cancer cemsul tat i on flow tiles & luno disease consultation asbestos si di ns }, 4} _ _ __ _ _ _I _ • Page 10 of 16 LINOERC l AL E X PER 1 ENIX e COhi> UL7IN0: kfrprraserstatiaa .Wastsara 40:vr�tKrtus�i ) tlrY wall products lu�)q tit srrase consultation GolvwIts, vote-Glauas intefskina.l cancer consultation *un ws & ashastov, trictel orv,ethyl one rfv vr*.; .,ham Y( ffil ui a ea se co:isul tokU w tr•t chl arootlhane,Y tatrachI oreethaner cabasstos & atr,arr•al respiratory cis!e*&*e ev"Oultaation i1bers rmfing , flooring, rwspirator-y disease consultation PA siding watwr i a ). s maboateu lung cancer consul tat i on pol ycycl is rAramati c allergenic raespon set consu) tat an fumes point raw-Ovaers osophageal cancer consultation wool—conductor noura%thwnic effocts Worker ' s Compenvati ',rn chowti ca►l s kidney UA swaso Claims Nso3 vends nasal tumors i s munof tax i c i ty paxychiorinated acute w4fects City of San Francisco b i phenyls IL PG&E bomcwyl ,o captan teratcl tag i cal effects consultation diaethoatal F,rovera bonnderctt n anti-viral drug FDA Registration Bovran Pharmaceutical pasra-nt trophernul cantact darraa►t i ti s Belleville Shoe Mfg & chromium salts OSHA organaphosphatos organophiCie>`r,rhate Workerr 's Compensation induced delayed Claims ntrurrotox ici ty environowntal clinical ecology Markar 's Compensation cthaaical s Claims EDWMD D. hiE1.TON, Pii. D. Page 11 04 16 C RCIAL EXPERIENCES COHOMTING4 Reprcrs&nts} ,i vor amvi rwamntsX Clinical aLa i ogy brtorkwMr ' ei L";ompeensat i ors chemicals Claims ars*nic & beryllium human teerepoisuro Cl ectranics Industry Mat verritaq atchants tau*+err tryst i cal ogw Electronics Industry dopants Oiisocyonotss acr.upatir.;nal asthma paint & plastic;* (points Ok plastics) industry arsbsrSUM rastricti ve lung di se Ozer Lang Share Act„ silica lung rancor & awsothal i,oa►s Ca►a&s L Civil Action anal geoi c*9 storai d asdvares? reactions toxicology evaluations new-cl erpt i s drugs anaphyl arc s i s i I EDWARD A. ME:L T ON , �F . 0. pace 12 of , b eUbL I Chi t 1 UNE r I - MIth*&, and �M l tan , E_ D. r 1'hp Production of Mi r.r0b i al M-R*g1aa story Matcerl a►l s by lass 01 ated A*pwn Tissue. f'X Ant anti Call "ye i si a .12,1 309-517 i 197 A 2. H010e61 U. W. r Wadley, F. L. , marl taro, E. D. and Chun, M. Y. s The Di at►'i but i on and Metas►bo l it swore if Cor t i cosztirran er lei Birds. IN, Procoad i ngse of the 6thr IrsstwrnAticanal EyatPOSIuaa on Campar-attvat Lredocrinmlogy, Oaan. and lreswiwp. ltndocrincl . a Suppl 3, 1'0 226-27Ei, 1972. 3. H01 ton , E.D. and Molawa, W. N. t The Distribution and Metabolism 04 Label, led Corti coutasssrotds In they [.'pack ( n#jL nJ4&Yrh 1 . J. Endocr1snva . , a 341-3859 1973. 4* W1 111 aass►sass, M.C. , Hrrl ton, E , D. and Gol dz i ehor, J. W. t The Urinary fttd100l i tarts of 174-0thynyl estragi of-9, Ill ON In Women. Chrtwnat*graph I c Prof i l 1 rig and Ident i,f icati tart t)f Ethynyl and 14Dnethynyl Compounds. Dter-ari ids 229•-240, 1975. �. lily tan, E. D. , Wi l l i awrreov H.C. and Gol dz i aahears-, J. W. t Human Ur•i mart,, Liver Conjugates of 17a cthys%y1w%trasad1o,1 . Gtoroi, dss, Z7sF15li-867 , 1976,E 6. Fiol-tan v E. D. , Williams, ".1T. and Sol dz i whwr w J . W. a Oxidative � Metabolism asssndl Lie-0thysrylla►ticn of 17ar-ethyny1wrtr&dicl by Baboon Liver Mi crus�m*A. Etssseroi da, t 71 -SZ , 197�'. 7. Hel t,On g E. D. and Gol dz t aerhar , J.W. s M etabol i arm of €thynyl Estrogens. J, Toxical . Envi ron. Health. , ;,a321--244 , 1977. 0. Haxl tM, E. D. and 19ol di l rNehor, 3.W. t The Pharmarok ina+ti cs of Uthynyl E%tr tygnns. A Review. Cant r at-Awp t i on, LA(3) sa 255 -284 , 1977. 7 i Hrarl tW o V- D. , C.+aasci ane, D.A. , Al thaus, Z. R. and Pl is 1t, N.D. a Metabal i saris► Of 17a--aethynyl ostr mdi aal by Intact Liver Parenchymal Calls Esclaataod from than Mouse and Mttt. J. Toxicol . Environ. Health , 3le953-963 , 1977. 10. Horning, E.D , Thonot , J.P. and Halton, E. D- sr Toxic Agertss Resulting frcm the Oxidative Metabolism of Storaiad Harmonies rind Drugs. J, Toxicol . Envi rssan. Hear 1 th, !J%341-361 ., 1979. 11. 1-aeitDn, E.D. , Hill , D.E, , QWxagh►, E.J. a i.ipa, Q.W. , King , J.W. , Jr. , Horni ncl i P. C. and Thenot , J,P. t Comparati vo Metabolism of nii ethyl :'st i 1 bestrol An the Mousss►e l lth esun Mankoy and Chi mpAnre*. J. Tex i col . Envi sron. Health, Est Nll2-4i3? 1978. 12.E Helton, E.D. i Hadd, H.E. o Wi l l i awst►, M.C, and bol da i Ieher - J. W, t r• nthersis of 17b-D-plucopyrana0aiduranic :acid ref 1?Ak-ethynyl*Stradiof , ;. .essrOi d Bloch". . 21237-239, 1979, t • f f Ei1WaRP p O. HEL T ON r PH, D, +paps 13 o4 16 PUIRL ICAT I ONV a (Con t i rivaad) 13. Nerltcnl E-0. 9 Hikl , D.Euy Lip* , S. W. any! King, J . W. , Jr. a MertabolAaalj of DU In the Rhosus M mkoy and Chi apanx Irv. J. Envi rf n. path. Ta x i col . an 14. Hel teen g E. D. , morph i B, J. 9 Ki nq, J. W. , Jr,, , Tho-not , J. P. acrid Morning, E„Co a Miotabol i sea of aril ethyl at i Ibestrol in the C3H anauserr Chromatographic SY NtOws iCAr that Quanti tstx ve /heal ysi s oaf l09E6 rs*t Abel is Priducts. EteRrai ds i UO) o 471-484, 1 q?8. !,5* Hill a O.E. , Rliksdrr', W. , Jr . , Helton , E. if. . Lipp, t3.W. , Newport , E. O. j Es l soak, Y o J o and Bailey, J..R, r Transpl acwntal Pharmacok i net i cs and Metabolism of D10thyl at i l beetral and 179—VatralRdi al in the Prognant Rhesus Monkey. J. C1 i r. Endocri nal . ftt;ab. �IS) r 8D1-l3�l�, 19®O. 16. Hadd, H.E. , Ailikkerr* W. and Halton , E. O. s the Synthesis and Chanract2ri:aati on eaf the 8l uco,pyranowi duroni c Acids of 17aX-tthsinylerstradiol-179. J. Eter-old blaachem. , U1 1 tu7-1114 , 1980. i 7. Rai tang, L. , 8Y i kkor v W. , Hi 1 1 v D.E. and Helton , E-,.p. i Ethynylt C1 taYagar of 1 7&-*thynyl Vstradi o1 in the Rhasus Monkey. Drug Metabolism and Disposition , . 2(2) a J29-134, I?gl . 18. Fuller, 0.0. , Ya tes r D. , Helton, E. D. and Hobson, W. C• t O1*thYlst1tbar6tr+a1 ai ftnadatropin Patterns in Infant Rhas► % Monkeys. J. Ster al d Di oc.hemi str-y, Alt 497, 1961 . 11. Clark , J.D. , Williams, M. , Upchurch, ll. , Eri cks son, 4.4. r Holton, E.D. and Parkaavori ch, B. v Ef Erects of Estracii of -17-A on I►N►.tcl eaar Occupsncy ref the Estrogen Receptor , Ntiaaulstiott ofNucleaaar Type 11 Bites and UterineG h■ J. Sterol d Di ochom. , LOs 323-3dyr�0, 1V@2. 20. Helton,, E.D. e Diornredical and Torricologieaal Evaluation. ��.sa�iti.rrnil , Cour *e Handbook 8or! cart Number 206 (H4-48102) , Practising L.aatt Institute, 1992. 21. Furl tr n, E.D., Purdy, T. and W111 i a ws, M.C. $ Analytical Meathadul agy for Estraga►;R Anal • xis. pp. 259-293 jUs Handbook of Carcinogens and Other Hazaar"dcaus Cheomi cal a, Bowman, H. (Ed. ) ,, Marrcel Ookkrr-, Inc. , New York, NY, 1992. 27. JurVV , A. * Al thaua, Z.R. , 81 i kker, W. and Halton, E.D. a Chronic Fffstts of Dirathyl st i Y boutrol aM Estrogen Metabolism in that Mouse. J. Unviron. Path. Taxicol . and Ontalc9yt IA(3) 9 1983. 23. Fiadd, H.E. , 81 i kker, MI-, Miller, D.N. and Hal ton, E.D. i Studies an Eynthosi s of the At c wrri c Pair of l 7D-81 uturani des of Ethynyl erstradi of . J. fteroid Eiochos. Ant i-7, 1903. wwA ILA EONMD 0. HELTON, 1-m. 0. !'age 14 of 16 PURL ICATIONSt (Conti need ) 24. Halton, E.D. and Holt , J.H, t The Di agnasi s or Mi sdi ^ynosi s of Occupational Disease. Pro"'"ice--foal l , li)c. Labor- Relations Guide Service, t.a 173-178, January 1903, 2S., Mrel ton , E. D. s 81 amodi,rat and Tax i nol ooi cal Eval uavi on. QSri. anal RUJIMItf Li t i AU on, Craur its ►4andbock Sort** 00. 237 (H4--4 k 94) , Practising 4.aw Inuti tuts , 199N. 26. Mal toll , Edward b• and hral t , Joan H. a Evaluating the Causation C4 Occupational Disease, Prentic*-+fall , Inc. Labor Rwl.at& ons Guide Service, Vol . &¢s 17-3-1710, March 1984. 27. $choenig, J. , Westland, J. anti Helton$ E. e E4fact of Short--Toren Administration of ium Saccharin oM RhasiAs Atnktey. Food Chemical Toxicology, Vol . 412) e931-934, 1984. E 29. Helton, Ede+rard V. , Joan H. HnI t and Fro!larlc H. W wtant Human Eaalwent f Intaxicatio+ne Ars Industrial Problem. Prontica-H411 , inL . Labor Relations Gul de Servi ca t pp„ 215--218 0 June 1985. 29, Helton, 6.0« a +festlamde JhA. and Mueller, W. : Placental Transfer of Pwamtachlorophen,:l in Rhesu+a Monkeys. In pra s sc. S Q 0% tQIQOY 30. Helton+ C .D. s The Potential Car►-.fnogenicity of Plant Pulyphtaena,lic Camp nwds. Bkabm1 ttwrd to the J. of Applied Toxicology. 31 . Ho"A tern, E. D. and Neewto,. . Frederic. I nduv ;,r i al Solvent Exposure ,and C26 Tasty .I coX og'y. In pr *p arat i on 32. Halton, E. D. and N&wton, Frederic. Acuto and Chronic Pesticide Intoxication. In prapar&ti pan. +rc page It of 16 ABSTRACTSt 1 . W41li 'AMA , M,V- , PWjt.011 , F' . 0, arty! wt%or• , J. Ww : 'The taAmbolism :�f Ethynyl estr &dial in Wo+etn. 2115151 SupPl + I lq"�4. 2. Hot ton E, D. , Wi 1 l A atoms, P4. C. and Gal dx i wher , J. W. r 7n* tiatabol i so of Ethynyl es4radi of in Wowen. J. Atterald E!arhea- vt 32Gy 1974, 3. 1-491 trip 0 F. fib. , Wi l l i a-ts, h,:C. , lka;do V,. 't"44 and Hadd , il . % Ut inot t and 1,i vrer .ZtWiJugsttes in 17a-at hyrryl estradi of in Wkamtkn. ),i�r f'r�o���eaecef rrgs of the �tPf Annual 11&*t i rQ a4 the �.r�0-xrl ne S*c i o�ty, 1976. w. Helton, E. A. anti Bough , N.J . R Excr•atie2a► and Met►tarbG sm of 7r•itAatt'd 131 ethyl eti lb-ostrol to than Female 1, SH House. J. ToxAca- Envi +ron. Health, Zr 3F '2--353, 1977. S. Hel ttan 5 E.13. , Wi 1 l i atas, M. C. and Goldzither , J.W. a Oxidative hot&bal l sa and Do- wth,/nyl ati on of 17a*-sthynyl estradi of In 9*ba,7n Liver h1croscimes. J. Taxicud . Env,irare. Health., b. HA II , V.E,. a Helton ,, E,.D. , Ltpe o Newport , S. D. , Exiarak, T.J. , &alloy, J%R. and young , J.F. a Trransp1e-yenta1 Transfer , Metabolism and Pharaacokinatics of blethylstilb2strol (DES) and Estraaicl- 178(tia) in Pregnant fthaesus Monkeys. Jt Prvc*&W nDs of the 40th Annual Ploot i ng of the Endocrine Socicty, 197R. 8. Hadd, N. E. and Hurl ton, t.D. t Synthesis and Chor actart 3rati am of 3 and 1 7--"l ucuroni ale Tr-i atetyl tkmomwthyl 1 la--at,htinyl tes-tr•adiol 1719 . 1h Prix eraedlim9s of thae GDth Annual Meeting of thin Endocrine Soci.et y r 1970. 9. Sl i kker , il. $ Hill , D. E. r Hol ton , E. D. a ft i sz tak , T. J. , Newport, p. D% , Lips, O.W. and Bai 1 ey, J . P. a Ca"ari scm of the Tr*nsp1 &c*nt&l Pharmae.oki nat i cn of Vi re hy,l sti l bestrol (DES) , 01 ethyl ati l bestral flonvillucuraitde WESik) and Estradiol 178(Er) 1P the thestis Mackey. Joint 1979 Monti ng of the Amer•A r mn Soci pty for Pharmacology and Exporimental Thterepoutics/Swisty of Toxicology. 10. Aa►i tans. L. , Sl i kicar „ W. r H1 l l , PL E, and Hel tan, E. D. to Metabolism of 17t-ethVoylwstrad1 of by the Rhesus Monkey. Actapptod , 1979, Meeting tit the Sm i oty of Toxicology. 1 f . Rl i kk*r, W. , Hill , D.E. , Al thanes , 1,.R. and Holton. E.D. i Compari ron of the Placental Transfer of Scow Bynthotic and Natural Oatr ogens An Ouebhua mn Primates. Submitted,, h1 st Annual Meeting of tha Endocrine Society$ 1979. I " . Slikkar , W. „ Hi11 ,, A.� . Lipal S.M. ` �e1�tQarts 6.P. 9 and Helton E.D. 1 WZC and Field Drewwptim Mass Spectroscopy of 11hosus ftmkey DES Conjugates. Aoe"pted, 1979 Mwrt l:gyp of tho Yoc i ety of Tox i cot ogy. A' Iowa. r FC�' V D. Page A or 146 M Haddt KE . Otikkar• , 00, , Ji- - o ;ieltoll , k`.,.1),, , '011 ,0 D. E. and kailtano, L. I Tt') ► Idont. 0 tr-ati on Of the tsf ikthynyl e*t►' v+dtol in Urinn 04 tho Rhaaus lUokvr Following Sbd i. zact� vs Admini str+ati+w). Subomittedt Met Hooting of the Endocrine Society, l� Yartec , b.. , Myssl.aaryclf 7 , Faller -, -.-WzLxono W, C'. , and Holtany E.D. t Al ter#tacans *f Neonatal ! m Rhaswo Monkeys Reoul t inQ from LA jjjjMgk And N0 an%ta l Enposure to P ethy l ati lbestrul . Subtni turd , Midecri ne Abeatr'act , 1981 . 13. Sai th, Q.bi• v Ware, A.G. , Herbal ,, C.M. , Tru j i l lo, P. A. and Mal tan , 9.9., v Tom i c of op i cal Eva l unt i oar ref 8e.fakje Product Fed to Saari Caws on Range �,: th Or$-Aant: Fr3ra►9t:w Submitted, Ahwr i can Society of AOM e&l 1kiance, 19,01, ib. Fuel l*rg 6-.0- o Mates , V, . Halton , E. D. and Hobsonj M.C. # Diethyletil,- bast:ral Rover sax of 01opardatropin Patterns in Infant Ithorus Mmko-re, 5U. International Syepoip l um raf the J. of Steroid Si ocham. , 1981. 17. NwI ton„ 1E.D. , Wwatl snda J , , Sel im, 8. , Hobson, W. and Muni l er , W. e Transplacentarl PharvwicalWy of Punta hloruphenol (PCP) in RhasiAo Monkeys. Submitted , Joint UPEWS 'T neetinq, !-ouisvi ,lle, KVv 1982, Vol . 2, No. 20 The Toxicologist , July+ 1?82, j Y 1 � Yr f 46 ATTACHMENT 2 7'Ir� J 1 1 II I I II 11 I y f� J i tie . ti 1 APPENC'IX E SEISMIC DESIGN OF STORAGE TANKS , EA S,6cpe Table E-11—Zone CoefiP1oAe*rt This appendix establishes recommended minimum -" _._ is Zone Zane � �^Scix,nic ;Carte per basic reg0rements for the design of storage tanks sub- _ _ COC11 7icnt __—�M_ _F rc •t ject to scismir load when sp 'f�ieti by purchaser.t These 0.1375 . .. .:.• .. .. .. .. ..... ..... t Requirements represent acc:pted practice for applica• 0.75. .. . . • . . .. .. •. . ...•. ...... . Lion to flay:bottom tanks. However, it is rcu)Enizcd that 1.0 • ,, , ,, ••,• •• •• ,; •, �•,• •• • } other proradur" and applicable factors or additional requirements many be specified by the purchaser or Noce: KQ e,tnhqualce duidn rtigw;rad for six ct, jurisdictional authorities. Any deviation from the rc- quirerricots herein must be by agreernen► between the purchaser and manufactt:r�r. ,�' —zone axffic;cnt from �gute E-? and •rablt:,E• . 1• f --rs:�.itti;a facilities factor. A factor of 1.0 shall E.2 Introduction tic used fr►r all tanks cxrepl when an ittcrci�d The design prdr.edure considers two rt:iFctnsc modest factor in specified by the purchaser. 1Cis remrnmended that the i factor not exceed 1.5 of the tank and its contents; (1) the':-JnLively high fte- . Ind that this maximum value be applied onlr.to quency amplified response to lateral ground motion of tanks that rnwst provide emergency post earth Li - the tank-shell and roof together with a portion of tt:e liquid contents which moves its unison Grit?t the shell, quake �rvita try the public, • and f2r the relatively low frequency ampli crl rc$�►ansc �! and Cx �-=lateral earthquake. forc`+o c:oeftictt:rts of a portion of the liquid contents in thelilac?amrntal derter.r.ined per l±..a.3. sloshing mo4e. The design requires the determination W. ==tot�ii weight of tank shell, in pounds. '• of the hydroriy cs namic mass aocia;ed with each mode X, —height from bcAtorn of tank shell to ccntcr .of and the lateral force and overlumi,ng inotnertt applied ye gravity of shr.11, in feet, to the shell resultin� from tilt. response masses to1V r �total weight o tank roof(fixed or fl gating) plus lateral ground motion.'Provision e includ"C, tonsc 4f the ma assurePotion of scow load, if .•any, ar specified by • stability of the tank shell against overturning and to purchau:r, in pourtd.�. . 11 -total height of tank !:h-ll, in feet. preclude buckling of the teak shelf due to longitudinal Wi =wei&t of effective mass of tank contents which •cnmprt"ssiort. •No previsions are includdct'regarding the incasa in moves in unison with tank shell, determined a • p•cr r�.3.2.1, impounds, hoop tension due to hori:,.ontal and vertical s4ismic art =beiFht•fro:r. bottom of tank shell to centroid of fortes sir= this does not affect shell thickness for the late.tal seismic force applies to Wr, determined lateral force cioeffitients specified herein, taking into per E.3.2.2, in feet,. aunt Sen.-rally &aepted increased allowable stress fy= -weight of affective mass of first mode sloshingand ductility ratios. contents of tank, determined per E.3.2.1, in ,f•''�un�t. E..3 --Ign Laading FLU OVEMRNING MOMENT The averttrr�ttirt t :mans due sty SCi3miC forms tl ' Ybe basis for these provisions togtttt *41% the ronnw!at: for spas p. design cur ci is . osurw E•x throush E-5 plus Worms6on fat eatcu- plied to the bottom of the shell.shatl be determined as itttinj otit-r seismic eKau sre in the piper"13956 of Seismic felkmws: Nsi"Pruvitioos for WtMed 5teJ St-)ibil; Ttakx"by k.S,Womiek t and A/. W. htitdh-U, 1978 Prwrs":t--AeJ1Ak1 trparmwRr. M so T I(Ct 6dA+GrW.I>ti + Ci Wt.7t't •t t'2 W=X2) aTbc orertuning Metacnt determinfd per this par■gnph is that sp- Where: plied to the bono.-•t of the shcU orgy.nw tank foun4adon k subjected to Fn additional ovcnw-tin j tnorncni due to laters" dbplamment of r� ctvCtiwrning moment applied to bottom of tank the lank watcou which may c led or tic c*ni idcrcd in the dcaiso of shell, in foot-pounds, torele roundrdceu such ar pile-suptr.'r+ad conacte mats, E•1 P4V 1 PA i Ilk 1 .Ae 0 + 2J 2 2 , - G 100 Z DO 300 40 - = t� 1 t t I MILES F Now for Can unn sebalie ass. refer so ¢Ic Ni .Wul boadAs Code of Ciamb.=upp. Na. : - Filum E-1—Sofswfe Zone lip+ - `` 1 wu14 r 'fir WdLNf) TNIL TAMI FCA 0% STORW wy � I s �r i ALASKA r r � � �j co 1 Q 200 40+0 1 ..J MILE$ ' I !R �r 0 JO � 2 it r 3 HA1Nai1 4 � MI1.E�1 Floure E-1--CQn;inutd r --- ---------- '. .RAN y 1 ' 4 API .04M 60 X2 -height from bottom of tank shell to centroid of 1.0 latstaMl Ilaismic force applied to W2, determined Pr P. 3.2.2, in feet. yyt 0A - _Tr _ .� 111"C"" AMASS OF TAW CONTENTS r oi•, IL3411 lbs effective manes W, and W2, may be 5-Li— dtetermined by multiplying Wrby the ratios WriWrAnd W 0'4 Z4_ WsIWr.respectively, obtained ::vm Figure E-2 for the J 0 Wr=total wesght of tank contents (product specific 0 1 .0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6 0 T.0 8.0 gravity specified by the purchaser), in pr`unds. D/H D -nominal diameter of tank, in feet (sea 3.F.1 .1 Figure----E-2 Note 1). H a height, in feet (see 3.6.3.2). 1 .0 - 9.3.2.2 The heigbis from the toottam of the tank shell to the centroids of the lateral seismic farces applied to Xr W, and Wt, Xt and Xz,may he determined by ,nultiply- H In-, H by the ratios X11H and X2lH, respectively, ob- a� 0.6 ,,__ tained from Figure E-3 for the ratio of Dill. N a — I 112.3.2.3 The curves in Figures E-2 and E•3 ;;re based X 0.4 on a modification of the equations presented in ERDA --? , H Technical information Dor.ument 70241. Aiternativeiv, 0.2 -----+-- �`---�` W1, W2, X1i and Xa may be determined by tether anaiy- �l�l� ticai procedures based on the dynamic charac;leristics of OU ' 1 .0- 7 U 3,0 A.�� 5.0 5 t7 7 0 8.0 th+,- tank. DIH 9.3.3 LATERAL FORCE COEFFICIENTS Figure--E•3 E.3.3.1 The lateral farce coefficient Cl shall be takers as 0,24. Where: S - site amplificatiryri factor from ?'able E�2, .3.3.2 The lateral farce cr►tffiricr!t C., shal{ be deft;- T - nature; period of first mode sloshing, in sec, milind as at function of the natural period of the first Ands. T may be determined from the folowing rnode sloshing. T, and the soil conditions at the tar' expres%ion: site. T When T is leas than )t equal to 4.5: k -factor obtained from Figure E-4 for the ratio .x 0.303 D11f. r E.3.3.3 Alternatively, by agreement between pur- , nen T is ateattet than 43: chaser and manufacturer, Ca and CZ may be determined from response spectra established for the slxcific site of the tank and which may also take into account 1h: dy- C3 A 1.33 S namic characteristics of the tank. The spectrum for Cr ahould be established for a damping coeffic:pnt of 2 per"rit of critical and scaled to a maximum amplified ----�--�---- aG.�eieration oft�.20 times the acceleration at gravity. r Tashi Inrvrrnatkm !�c�cvrr+t�+c tote, Nti�cknr fic.c�on and 'no. spectrum :or C� yh��uld correspond to the spectrum$ar�bgwkp, prtp�ac�t bytracktccd tircrNt Corp�c►ralion, and for C.'1 ��c�p HOW'A Narvtt, Inc.. for the U.S. Alam►c Energy COMMistlon, t mvJzfird for a damping coefficient of 0.5 Avtas: IWj. person, of critical. , r, � A ti c" 11Vtt1Ceo$TE�II �Md►.i t�Orl G14 GYem,►4a: US L4.1 Rasistamm to the overlurning moment at the bottom of that shell may Os provided by the weight of .� the tams shall and by the weight of a portion of ih, tank 0.5 O tttents adjacent to thi* rhtil for unanchored tanks or by aiw1wrs#« of tho tank shell. For unanchored tanks, 0.5 . f Ow portion of the contents which may be utilized to 0 1.0 �.� 9A 4,C! $,0 60 �.� 8"C resist overturning is dependent on the width of the bot• D/W tom plate under the shell which lifts off the foundation FIgur --E-4 and may be determined as follows: tier of the bottom, the width of the thick,sr plate un&r '"' 7'9ra aY the shel i in feet. measured radially inward tram the ` except that wL shall not exceed 1.25 GHD. shell, Shall be equal to or greater than: f Where: 0.0274 ' -ti— t;H wL maximum weight of tank contents which may he utilized to resist the shell overturning moment, E.5 Shell Comprelktslon in pounds per foot of shell circumference. G thickness of hottom plate undcr the shell, in E.5.1 UNANCHOriEU TANKS inches. The maximum longitudinal compress;vc force at the Fir . minimum Spacified yield strength of bottom bottom of the shell may be deternined as follows: plate under the shell, in pounds per square � inch. Whr.n M -- is equal to or less than 0.795: G - design specific gravity of liquid to be stored m D2(wr + wL) l specified by the purAaser. 1.273M i E.4.2 The thickness of the I Atom Elate under the D shell, ti,, shall not exceed the thickness of the bottom shell course, or !/, inch, whichever is greater. Where the Whc n 0 2(w + .� is greater than 0.795 but less bottom plate under the shell is thicker than the remain• � + w�) than or equal to 1.5: b may he ecrnputed from the value of the hollowing Table E-2-81to Amplification Factors nrameter obtained from Figure E-5. — - Soil Prd)nle Site Annplifization b* !!I Tie - Factor .�� Notes Wr ♦ wL A 1.0 1 a 1.2 2 C t.3 3 When 1.5 c 6C 1.57 Vaknown 1.3 4 &(Wt 4" W�) 1. foil Pmfik A it a profile with: b + wL 1. 490 a. lures of any characteristic, either shal<•like of crystalline In we + WL � 0.637JIf a'a tt qfv, Such material may be &&Aaac►ircd by a shear wave 1 ,. ati� vcl xilr senator than 2M test per,crusted; of b. $all so c"Witiata sphere the moil depth is lass then mo rest athd the slit types ovttfying rack are ankik ftosits of%an&,/rav• eta,or stiff days. When —�----�--�--- Is greater than 1.37 or a Y. SON!1'MC4 9 is a profile with deep cohesionless or stiff clay condi• D (ws + L) 121 t:atsa,I'rwttvdinS aitcs'vtittt the taord depth casaeeda 2e0 reef and the toil typal►owt� ft tick art stable depoats of sand,. Srawrets, of air! exceeds Fe(sine g.3r3 j the task is structurally utwlstbta, qsp16 it is necessary to either: 3• 3W Protite C h a preAlr with eon•to-medium-stilt dap sand sa n&. sthtd by 30 haet or snare of sott•tatnediu:t,•stitt day with of 1• Increase the thickness of the bottom plate ll, r., to i ncrease rN laate tinder the sanest later"Mog latntrs of sand or other cohasionkau soils. • e. hs lasatiorrs wkwe ik soil peo ik is net known in sufficient detail s c providing g that the limitations of to drtennim the sal profile typst,Soil Prorile C shall tw aatsvmcd. E.4.1 and E,4•2 are not exceeded, or Aw t ,r OEM •�•�",'III;• R1 •.. i Wr J .•A: !r �.1 Y W r • v k O AM SYMOVO so I 'E 10.0 stress, F., determined by the &JIewing formulate for h* 1 which take into account the affect of internal pretsuce due to the liquid contents, 4.0 WM9N t I w j 'S Is? GMD2 a♦�, < < When value of is greaser than or aquas to Jelly: w'rt'vi i rj� ♦w+l let 4. When the value of GHD=- is less than 101. 4.0 ......_.._._..._ -- Fa + 60ll H W^ " `-'M�" u 7a5 Except that in no case shall the value of F. exceed 05 „,t * .UJ Fry' Dy Where: thickness exOuding corrosion allowance,of the 0.8 1.0 112 1,4 1 .6 bottom shell course, in inches, _ .. F. =maximum allowable longitudinal compressive D2 (w, + W411 Stress in the shel), in Founds per .;quart inch. F,y = minimum specified yield strength of the bottom shill course, in pounds per square inch, Figure--4i-s E.8.4 UPPER SH'I"LL COURSES 2. Increase sheif thickr.tmsR, r, or If the thickness of the lower shell course calculated to 3. Change the: proportions ottlie tank to inCTCaW. tho resist the seismic overturning moment is greater than diameter and reduce the Height, or the thickness required for hydrustatir pressure, Myth r. Anchor the tank per E,$. excluding corrosion allowance, .ben the Calculated Where: thickness of each upper shell course for hydio,satic pressure shall be increased in the same proportion. sin- maximttnt longitud;nal slier!)compressive farce, less a special �naly�is is made to .:elermine the seismic in pounds per toot cf rhos! .,rCumfertnce. overturning morr.ent and torresponding stresses at the t +vr weight of tank shell and 1f.-,rtion of filed roof bottom of each upper sFteli course. supported by shell, in pounds per foot of shell p>rt~nmference. EX Anchorage of Tanks �.7 AMNWMW TAN!"I When anchorage is considered riccessiary. itt shall be r ► Isslut ftm longitudinal wmprrm. - force at the designed to provide a minimum anchorage resistance in 1blOOM d the deals may be shetetmined as follows: Funds per foot of shell circumference of: �.2�� M 1.273 M a W, + D' ,;. . 02 The stresses due, to anchor foretse in the tank shell at the points of attachment of the anchinrs shall be invesli- MAMMUM ALLOWANLS SMELL gated.' TIN solzimum longitudinal compressive stress in the ' For a deWV procedure see Par, VIi.Anceoi Boll CruirsE,of"Steel the E"Oncerins Data—Volume 2, UWASI teldrn OW"o» flit De- shall not txceed the maxinium allowable ap 0 Plate Sirurtvres", published by the Commiiie_ of star+ hart _ P'rodumn. AmedcAn Iron and sitcl Insiitute, , *F MYLILrIIQ !TIOL TAM$ /GN M $TOPA" E•T � M ��M1 i ��u��M�n u.�i++�i a 1��..�.�ii w,r�w...�� �"•ww'�-�`.�++�w�����...�i��wrr� Pwry tired to minitnize or avoid overflow and damage to the usable 14ttlbility Aid be provided in the vertkal root and upper shell due to sloshing bf the liquid Gorr. OWOW for ell Was attached to the shell or bottom tents. of the teak. On tsaanchored tanks subject it) bottom 11*2 7fie base of the roof supporting columns shalt !, pioal comeled to the bottom shall �4 free to be restrained to prevent lateral movement durlog earth- NU*M tw bottotta or shall be located so that the hams• quakes. When sprcified by the pumhao�r, the columns sostW df m measured from the shell to the edge of shall be designed to resist the forces caused by the slash• tho epetfctiog reinfora;ensent shall be the width of the I, om hoW down as calculated in E.4.2 plus V. i Inches. ng of the liquid contents. 1.8 AddMonal Coma eratlon E.d.3 The additional vertical forces at the shell due to the seismic overturning moment shall be considers4 in 141 The purchaser shall specify any freeboard de- the design of the tank foundation. .Fn• J k r r,1 A'J MVT1 y1A r1 1� �r 00:Ik'I W, Ogg 4 ATTAOCCHMEHT 3 y Y' :1 r �1f.1r Tf i+f Wv mob The fallowInq Vietrtct Ma s DK's) show the location o the 32 separate parcels ,, W thin the City ct Huntington Beach currently zoned --01, combined with oil . DrSTRTCT NUMBER OF PARCEL MAP ZONED •-01 DM 2 7 oM 3 210 DM 4 2 DM 10 2 _ DM 12 1 DM 13 4 DM 16 1 LAM 22 3 DM 24 1 DM 31 1. DM 38 4 DM 39 5 TOTAL 5" 1 ' I r ' it t a s i I t ne y l� Ty F (`W., , r;r r SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAr "WIf r "Jill" „Isw MDT + CITY �► -A/MYIM IIt W Ifil a7Y aA1MCk OAlI�tIMCtt t164 IN y.. iw w11wN ..r wwr a wr OFr1 r fYl 1A ■ttw ru ifMT■■ smog pLr N I" Mal a /ti{" tiC1■rl/ M w ll :1■.r d pit r w�y If fM f`►•11 I�y H LEAW: 4 I M i'A•I !1 tt[KN i 1{�L►'�tiri►t 1. � .1 t. �` ,►, Z.. ItYfa.lMrt..MeMlr+MIrKr ` N 'oNBEACH :»� r e . Cc arl+rwrd•rpuryrt+ratr�.awM.t+lrr�y r -FR !! w� ® ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA � T 5� t81C l ,■I■vI1D.wrw+w. t■�rrfr l-r a� J./ F o 1\ tIMN IAgitlI 1�it .. w �r l.t•' f r r. w a r �•.•ti t' •w +- Dra n f r wr,r trypar n.l•p f�.r 1 �.' +i �►� ..Dr��i1•f• � aw�rrlr �R+,1i+�df■o+l j#1D r �•,y + Ir1+ �.0 ,'f''' IV 1� r�'r. F + w■■Ir-.p rri.r I+■++..rrw.asracr (7 r+ N f •i■ ■W r v.•r� f• 7 � IY1� �w+siWrrW wwrlc,.r, 'M t1+11 hM r'I. 1M 'cif .."/ n1,yYMiI! I , 1 .. ,•r. trr* u►w M 1•+'rr r , I,D�p i � I�ata%61v 00"A"k aAlr•■r Y•M ■ni ya.M ��•w Mo iI r�•. I,• 1!C{1 i011MOrr rKi.drfll•7[t WrMrr na•ro to ,u1+ ■ r rr l,' �+h wr.oa rwrtipw: ►,.n w w . rr nl" 1i19 i s i" ii,► !r i 23 ii 1 fit l:0 1 tlw.Ivr aaD+ ItyttUl,�+„w.aw► r.,f/ ry•A1r1 ,r■0 I'f94 r••o I +mc M■TRKI r...r iJINM O{irK'A� T M H I d RA-0 -- ly—ry�+1� ; �,/} m raw,, a rR2 MI-A �,,,,y,a I I RA AV1J �Ri �• RIjAt.l r.lr. 1\241 j R2 � P, NI( ' R2-a Ray_ z,F'rt+�a-art► ////�� •- _� �� -^� Plr•Npli•14 7 t_�1 {�..J Lam.. _ xM:tin.,, �i�,a�r ''•..-...-.. ... •� � � •' l ,w r k:f Ir! I� 1� R� H3 cz• f R?-U-P .�r I A Rai - R2 Aa +r - j•• r- T. lv.r :, •;�7tr I{. z-0 )vtD— RE •YMf r51s+A 5 t jam,, ... -DWL AV R2 0.a �� +a iiVirM !I `} +* Twwscv�-tr ;_ ,,->r RZ U nr r Rl L r R2 R 2 F ��++ fit 0 � CF-C w�f CF-F -rya 1.,,, LrAnal / R2 +,-co 'h A--_. �� `I 11 R G C G . ,t.urr M:6•,tlT;1.00`7 1 � ._ `r " R2-0 R2 R?r CF`F ygGq I I •CLI-0 CD O I Y Ix ..rN— �i -Ca-O Q a "2-0 RZ-0 I ` � $ -oFol •aH NOW— CF-R RI R1 RI RI RI -Cfj-J •+�` I - a c , r t .�..J -Cp.0 o r a+' a -a -o -a -o " [I' r ' N 8Nr IL tt� 41 O a 4 rx -0 -0 -O •(� tV to O� 1 I �r RI RI RI R I RI -0 �►ihsir�•iin a 1 «I ADAMS — - AW i' 1: •v'1 1 •q Ij`I ., �r' 1 «I'_""",�--�••—•y. ZONINGS SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP Is CITY OF .ovrcro M.wc.s /, �r.o 4& i t Ely" "*JR k 008041 JC1k IMF rr, ` `� `ri"w•'► r lfiL HUNTINGTON � �. Nam II BEACH t!T Mr J- , Ir h� r��.,yw� R•1.1!1FN! i-1•i7D se1w•p� rlrTr•9a+ '" y1F 1•Y•O! Fi•� Yr+p 4�wllinr7 +M17 wy /1 f / y•f�� M-M Ho T•., '► .,,,, lrMMrt,iJY. l�eliIirMtr f _ pJ ■. r� (( Ar ��� ` {•11••►� ten i!•Ir M� I,"A W11r..k.- ��IR.I�iY 1RY�•11Y.J io lt+i*h•,V/ A COUNTY,J (� jr , Cy A I, l 1"01 �1 I A .t �„�, �•,.w.. , ro•r+hl r.-o HOi �y�7 �'•bTI h-I IMr y.ra Midi iti�jMM r-i•Tt ry•1T IT , iii{+++ 5-A"" ►T I'! i M.9 (SuP�J r.rn.77r,ta adw wyMrr11•�IYIrNre f IA �I'r I•S•I1 71• 1�±1 •W �1KIUw/K. O►K 1�11 y ' I R•TY TFS► IFN u <�wr r7.M�.net77w � •i q•7� T}p M� GARNICLp 211 rs t1 71 IIP41 UIX"sst�w eFtlkr N w CZ _'____••_r r PA-0 I -` • ff -D W 0 11 v, j��+ �a`�,, L� �'��:;;i •�,r, ���//e� bhyy Yf ���. 6YOlf ,yvSJ q-•,J ~.. -_ ^ ''& .,.1. .� �•� J/J 'r•7'T',/hl 1\ 11� 'J /Ii,+', 4 Ri pi • `'i,^ 19•1'41,11-y+ r � :�• ,r rf' I ' . 1'/ -V ffr�l V�c� .i , r!t R 01' I ,1. RI { RAl •� aye{h• (ti b, \ �'�=,.r ``ti�yl�I ,.•�/yf/� yy ir11' t.t!c 7• y I ; ��Iy:'.��;.� ;,� Olr•, �� � k4-(�il� aaa J` � i i � I R2•PR'O'GZ� �"�• �<'� �h •,`r�"� 1�+�. „i ti'r�,w. � �,� /��f', OS RloO 14 /-•• .�'v— ill,• �y �•ro-o-ci � �/�, rRl,/ "� •'mow i ••ter., --- a\ y. ._ f/ I►'�' ' ,• J� ,�1 ff ova 00 4 II �. Allt• C� \`; ` F/•T : ;a,v 1' ` FI ��• ,yr� V'1 Jam" I '' ►' �` f{LQ i��,. } Ft 46 r �► • lot .►,; •cam ��� 'x �d• • �,�, � +I� .. - - ;f,•, oo w 1 , �r DM 4 v ' E C T,10 N A t DISTRICT M A P 4-6-11 8k 5-6-1 i !� M14TE� �! CITY OF �71v MMT ,eM\�MIr MIPMMI prw\1 mw �p� mum whew► vw+lutf 1 INGTON lxll rift MWA \Y war.rm I&MY HU'-- .T- O•If•f0 AYlQ eveIRlIM/IY eiliC 11M 1\/UIQ ii 'fl 1.1.7i 1f+A Mi/ �.4'•/1 �• �Yf ��111KNo*MWI 1ti1P1-�Iy11Y1F1 I i t I r~a t ~-K 7�FT YMIt ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA 6-0 .M.•1 ><«>` (M,IK ey1b�.pIf>>01\CI pp� ��IfYC\r'It�1 r i�I oif r;q Mf[i\t 1!Iellr, m u+ +Ilc+vu�l •teA1J iil i�/a1•\ K KMKt�emwcr f Y`swrlrrl � �fr.rNni1,.nle�r Ewa kow%$rr u�1�Kr •//i Ir11w RIIM l?IT \I �� , I (, �ViW IV'4•�1, w \ I G • \ \ l ••�,• �' r•Idvti\eel;,+�•'� N 1 ��� t_\i: 7j"'t�' ,4YW* �! `Si' - �+� �ass�'',,. y'pl �I''�1�!!�"iii"�'�. i'1•' ''Y� �i ... 11 R2-PLO-0-71i '� �� R3-17•U �L � I I II r� hcr• I 14 N f � ,` 1 •V� Be>1117 Idl�'b•V':.f1'1-1h1'�tYl".'„ fipwr nklr,h 11 T 10 SrECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP IL im WIN CI TY O F vilo%mids WrYMr CiTf st.-406,L W00AING *0 110"NFOA 40mm.1= ILM guru M Vil W.10 wwasomirli=#Wflfwvm a' HUNTINGTON BEAC11 Vwp*wt,&.Pw"-mow ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA LrK; L.W"o vivo V& gavialk iftwo wi. &%*jWD it pkis ftl ft W. WA*-Nhf YAM !'#I 'AWPO Vivo ft Hit) .fi 4jP IT AL RIO rip jK Ir Ile ,q ,`'�`,` � ol OL try. 00 r I'- 01 f ARJVT 01".c PI.M 01' 46- Oft 'A 01 2 0 e A�. 111MAM 11114T 110 mom amomaw oTf,, b,.il ILL Ifti"ADWO Lot lo 140 &rd 1464 wit .,&.Sol V mg I fflisimb"asivah M fie m-woo All r .-.��T ... .. �T __ • w wy' ' r wr •E . Yeti _fir,L,. ,' ,• r l �� _ �7h11M�ir.....��.r�.Y11Yl�w �_n• — SrE T10NAL WSTRICT MAP j1WV1s 61k11904 ?,low � C171 COW91/. Or11NAWW 49 „1 rrM►.p4wpm am worm rAYs�/w Y OF I ��.r►r .Mn �. B+'y.�• //y' IArAM.tr +Iltn►w� �. A �rlPUNTINGTO M�iM1 1 IF~ NIt/ w+r � ri 0IZA.NGIE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA �'� ,{►r..1..1.�. ..1,►o 11YII 11�f�.r.rr N+r{P1M►*Ilrrlr ►Iw,lnr M•11..�11lIIIIl1 j�, • ' r�rr M on Y/MrM�/Il�rr{fur Mno mamas Will rmi"Ift InlhlrrlMMN 1 Y q-rl II.( r.fMtl ►A{ �.� r.+ 1 a•+ t r w mmul►IMACII 1W 11" r 1 n "� H j•i ii re rn r+rin MM ADAMS AVE, wmil+rm{"*Wsmr., 1 ON Iw. _ LI a_—fU 1._Jl-_! t.r ...1LJ 1 __ J f ...r..l l._..•J jr {" N`•r,"i1 J L 0-t� Itl R-I Ihl lar w - 'f' _RI .}Now C2 _ RI AI RI RI R ic4- •� -� --- Y.,p kl Al Ni 01.1 R1 R •p 'q ,.0 IrV.+Crt At'•pCLr/ rl 141 i.'Wk mn1 1 I �� w.►��e�NrR RI 1' LL R LIU �— ! R3 C4 1 � 1 � r � Y i { All 1; �. / n 1 _ hof XVIL R3 �r�l .03 R r T 113 R3 R3 C� A 3 R3 LD I—ji Fln 13 � r I - hhh�Ill r I • cW � [� �r .r06 i 1 . iS•. �'A� n 14 I At of . I � '� 1 r � � 1 �'jlft•IU W�►1�•nF C I f M _I rin , �t` SSL1''�,�w^ •� ATLANTA //J//!/r////J' A YG7t 1 r I l" .w w rrer ql so"rYY rwl.wl Yr,r�.r OF AI f i•A+i� Y rlFYrmr Ir rnl Yi r. r"ll WNW Y*a 14-•. fA �r>lAl�CJIr�V r1�M or 9-W. i rlh'�IIII������uu._riuur��ir_Irl_ i •1= yam, /', M�, � � {4•- ! M1 ECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP •', I+�rt� a11a1ef 1llr lea fy ��► J� � far CITY OF wclofal a��M •Ilaal.it� M►M► w � . �.1�.� ,'.1 u.'�n �•a•M Ir• �•►•n � IMr r r.��r .a 0 a•M al Mr •�•11 1�ft fq `RgilfB� HIT GTO BACHAg. f1Aff1 Mf f•1•M fd� fN1 �� .' NE • 1•frt fiI W 0*-% 1f•e 1Me KJrYfi01tf1McwI. r•a•u 1M e1� Q 1�iry� N•M ef11 e•14s so Dell ■•.ae 1e-e :ae Pe111f + 1.1-" rM *A • e•11! � r "I'" 1g (af111 t ""a Was 0! ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1�« '" I"Als1.1f♦�►��1� xnrlwla wt+11 nlror1101P 0.1-0 40 1" 0.16.0 p•1 IF" wMrYML fff*IAIRu 1Ma1�1t*a11 aJ+f+rf� 8•/!-� �N IIM f�f•ati M•11 fah �fladrueaw Mr11�1 14.6,60 m IMR ff N•In No-dolr f>AfeiNf ft If t•*-a M) INl WOW^a1101111MA&N1 W �/�y� W� 1•M•M frJ•Y woWOO ISO * 1m haft Milid,•rp �NI e.anlarlMl rN 1 . �.le.�► of•f11 Il'N (AI*go loft •0-If•iv H'•111 110'e �btl�f�la MHffr/ 1.11. 11 to•11 06 - nA11►fwAww eMN/1 ad TV" Ldw rJ i!A•11 f1•M I la Pi RI R1 ' RI R; Pt .a' of RI RI a R1 RI 9 • .,• rZIIRI RWI I t•,4. �• ,.�_� J Itf k� R� a w ••; - R i Rl Al RI RI w• � I .� RI tii III CF-R NI s RI ki itl Q RI RI RI I RI i fy i. RI � 3 Rf � r RI RI Pi --� " f RI RI CF-R RI I M WI �'— RI RI RI Itl f rwocl RI RI RI ; l RI"7; 1 RIAL R1 rk a `'7R RI it nl 1� 1 3 Fh Ci tJ i J RI CF"E ' RI R1 1�1 1►'LT[k11(M/1k:K9�l fY '•�•-,yr' •�~ ••, f� •1 !11 v RI t J CR/!, /' •C`M•r` ` 17� � RI RI RI �, �r...Y',r ,,%~ 1�I J �t• ,; . �1 � .1J1� l� /h ..�, r � •� r. RI IR R1 RI S' R I RI R1 1{I RI 'J z RI RI I `fIC1f4a P �►¢•. _,•— :��:� '- lI ,.�i J.• 1(•i• I.• ..,, ._. Rr ` w R1 R ;�"RI RI ���. nl _Ci '�_'•'• �-�` . ._ _... .__ - ' `�•'1 _... AtLAWYA Jr�f /���%7 /1//I' / /�/// �/%///� �%%J�r/!J%/////1/ !// / . �AVE �, �" , '�;�Y��: • :�„� *' 4 1ji,', "r w .00 W,6 mh Yf'� r W��'• 19,y� ' �4 )nark '�'� `,. •} •w � y y 1 4 �,. SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 14 '6-1I _ w �•I��.R IA 1 ���1• CJW OF 1MMIAM"km 1u11a IMF i`xtls ma ktamw ram Now* 'HUNTINGTON BEACH la cook%W" .otr gold is ww+e " womm ma EL~Vwx AVLAWA 1, rb pm RR•�!b�"F1/ ' MH`a` � •6M•IWN � • r• J 4 i aka *� • '� i �� 1\��•. �� ,I����I��1\I A.1��1. IMF .1 - — YY1YY1 1 . .11 1 � � � �i�! � i�'1 i,� r� F y. �J T ,V •��� '�y�'i I •_ _ _ _ _ J _ � ..., �� �. t ��' �„1Mi•' I �1 �� J.:' )f �� / ,�• ! �'; h �ylt k 'r dl.y .1� � '1�I �', ,�9"�'�' a Ad 1. � 'rY•Ne..n, If ` r � • SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 19-6-10 • No�u w� r,� CITY O604WF a ab+ rrtr ovwMea 1�pRar�Y �rw r, ""WAR fia"I J?ffff4GTON KA146t c6liN Y, CALIFORNIA RI Ai Al cr RI x RI Sa RI al "RI 111 nl RI ,� RI AI R! RI � � RI y 4 LOCI' ,. .1 p� f 0.1 10, ry fit 40 �! � a VV / �tiY �'r -m MONO h Yr r � b�t �+ �, �'r„ � ¢1 �� �� 1 . , �,i a 6i� � a • t 16 li 'roe # ������5�� r• ; ' ' � ' 1 ����� 4.� •r', � - +a .P1r; � ,,y-'y�0 � ^.M-. 5 � � `�;i�r� 'I����. ,YI .r y • „ „�,'�;1,, • ftW SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 21-5-11 � 5 r !m"MOON""s"tom *"��►o u fa two WT I one flNiii ifi f�li�!#!h/Gul" M•�rMt ii ftir INV I�t•• �M � r 1 W , 13 -MAn + � '� 11iM�•ilMigM��hM4R � 11�111YI1 M1111i J �r�iflAlNf �11NlR� 4MR�i 1 r : • ORS , �COU NTH CALIFORNIA irk;{! • � ri1Nil�i MY�iil/ l�It jaw�Tf son"M MoIRf r'' 1 ���1�1 Mr �1/�M7 MM� r�1AhlMf�i1 #Mr M �-ibll hyNl AM an"*eftf" Now / • f 1 � r .� f Y111M Kw �iS! Ii oil M RlI s RI � �Ir-•-` ft l � R I '" RI RI ItI CF-E • I I RI tvti.t�rc verr s.rr..v�,ti — _..-.Jls RI RI I R I .� .,....�. 01R RI Al Ill a V I (KAMM tlW.W fc3Wx; v� S RI RI M HN RI R1 RI RI RI RI RI I KI e / 9L.Jil hl � NrH 11. pit R1 + R2 R2 MM RI Al Rb CR I I�i'IR"g 1q'FI� ' �---� 1 CF_, R ROS RI RI R t+ W� Rl RI R If'P* UMH R1 Rg R��" R, � ;t ate.. ...—.�._•!I.;.�... • w '2 Iwo OGS-FK 4 cot it C4-FP2 WARM If n� 4 �•{CIA''' � � �u, ��� kT 1 DM B1 SECTIONAL DISTRICT • M AP 5 11 mftw »r"A"r s wNw M will ivlil! Uff OF W" IWOM 64� hi mw Now It r it d4p It HUNTINGTON JBEACH #00 SOUP ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Oft-Nm mmp �.,.. � r �� IrA retrsv 1 , `�M�•MMI4YIIIIN4MIf1 Nwwr s. sm tm m"g r sMOON so ty a.OFim"6.!\w�1jfM#)l v[ mi ." C4-MS CF-E i C-F-R { Rz _ A bb« I L7 CF-E RI MI~M Mi M ' tawc vats bc�ob�� Rd I R3 Ca I I RI AI } ,.ND 3 Y Rs .w Rh cc' •RIB-CD awe arc t Ri�CD cv �a•ca� 8 R� R R3 116 M D MI MH MI m I z R2 CF-R M I W _ R3 f .R2 Ca ♦ bI-cD /MI ■ R2 I � w R2mi e 14t1- CQ � � � � ' R2 R2 C41 MI-CD � M I 1 +N i TA!DER AV'd air 4�A1 r ,�', v�F �, � �• -r,r. " v, � 1 y r Y.1 ;r � • ,ram . Ir r + SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 34* 5 I � " i" �M1+1Dti �ww► A1M &A 0420w W w MW Uff OF � +L �� � ris 1A 7M elmme «wm ams t"Womm Say BEACHLA F 1 a a"� «.rwurw«Nan MUMNGTON i.11.1i aa! 16�[FA MM � • � r1M�I �aiv iae ISM D�"Fw�F�p +� rr 01ANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIAwomwtv Igo fag ��� � ���""►�"' �r� N�11•n rr� AlA� N+wY�ielrw.,u EMI 111-Ct A1�lQ I �r //��Jy��,,CJ r �I � RI RI R I hl �► w R f IMIMiWilf WARM r I-� D R A-0-CO Rl—C ocD soco RINEa� = C2-0 (pR�Y0NCD1 -co � kAfi•W Mee RA-0—CD 404*431-smo. RA-0 t W-0-CD _ co RA-0 r :::,�; IWO-= RA-o •OF g RA-01 RA-0 u,-o-c'o RA-0-CD .___Muir a P*01-cz I t RA-0-CD I � I/ y RA-o-HIV I�' DAlIf+1�1.P AVE. + 1 � s i: r + 6 .,y -'r4 �� ly yr• �r�;rk� � r r '' 4,1i. •„ ,, � Y} 0, Mrr ry 'r , 1, `rJ o r;l" t'y �(' "Ay,. Ai.y A ,�y.r0� i�p �i ^'�r �„ %�•"'�T�" '� .� t /Y'�" �4i�.�a.�� 'ly,,�' �' '��rl.�s —• i�' - i;Ipa� �4, r ''� r � " '�iY'� i � y SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 3•5,wII b "' mmem WraToml ft;M �.w IN rat. AW m w M�MI IMF Mwo Md~M auto WFORow.M I ftm M ■�M �w Uff. OF ri.ur NrMR&NOW HU NGTON BEACE ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA «�► �• .wnw r�Tsl�wr.r�++1 Mi-CD WA s � IAA r R4-OR •o CF-R MI-CD e _ C 4 Mt�Y■irgM rrlthY,►.�:t MI-^ � RI + Rl ! MI-Ca .: -�.� 2 CF-R C a w-t.► t M' A-0-CD r--- - Itl RI ml pot RI R3 MI �• b °4 �.� M1-ram _ MI-0-CD R2 ` C 2 CZ RA-0-CD N2 0p M2-4 R3 1W op MI-0 riwi� Tom- M•D :! '� UsA111R7 ' C4 ' + . PACFICA Y PLAN R3 �1 j Z OP s �•-i dP R 2 -� rimrr-o '% ,� r R3 (''ir•0 )P OPT il$ �a�11- R2 i • - SAWIVAD AVE ■ nM I I NM^' 'EY Y it =• ,: •Ar r, r 1,10 ,v ,��0 a •w µ � Af v4' t, ply . y Abligh Nov, 101 2688 6.1 to Flannin commissioul • Approval. of ' xo 'Ir -11/00 Permit no. 98 -25/ tto=0 W 11ap60t Report Not 80-1 h 4 2"ViVOW00001 UpAct Rspost 56-1 7; #rIssofielld Oil R000very project) 15 RMBT GIVM that the Huntington Beach city Council will s public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Center, 2000 X41a Street , Huntington B4arh, California, on the dak6 and at the time indicated below to receive abd consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the x application deacr '.bed glow. Monday, November 21, 1988 s 7:00 PW Appeal to Planning Commission' s Approval of Zone Change No. 88r-11/Use Permit No . 88-25/Supplemental Rnvironmental. Impact Report No . 88-1 and Rnvironftntal Impact Report, +.o . 86-1 y Angus Petroleum Corporration 1. Councilwoman Grace Winchell 2 . Concerned Citizens For Huntington Beach The project site consists of two bl.ocAs located on oppoaito corners as follows (Secs attached map) : 319CILA.(Tu.C#�.. 122471.: bounded by Springfield � Avenue, Delaware Street, Rochester Avenue and California Street; and J JQCh 8 ,(Tract_ 12746). : bounded by Toronto Avenue, ;. Calffornia Street, Springfield Avenue and Huntington ` Street. l; 2ane .Chi•: Rezone Block A (Tract 12747) from "Qldtowd Specific Flan-District Two-tail Facilities (OT--2-0) " to "Gldtown Specific Plan-district Two -Gil Facilities with ail Drilling(OT-2-01) " to allow the drilling of new oil wells . Mae PsrAit: To develop an oil consolidation drillsite on Block A and associated oil facility on Block B . Also requested is a reduction of exterior sideyard setbacks from ten ( za) feet to a minimum seven: ( 7) feet for the north and south elevations of both blocks, (1150d-13) .y 1 rS •� N, 1 1 d"'' 11 r v k��1r � 1� r 9• sy, 1 r c „ �','!. r �.• 1 t d` i ' .� . � „ . '+r Yl�i }'' '"�'`i',wp` r "Pies of plc amino ( . ) Octo s 18+ 1988 the Planning Commission approved . r adoption of Zone C114AVO No 0 "-Ile a ; Vin Sprit Mo, 86..15 and 8pprov0d Certification of suppleiWital t0wontal Impact Report go . 88-1 and Viragiiiantol impact Report No. 86-1 with a KConsiderationsBtete nt of Overriding r The City Council is required to certify as adequate Supplemental Environmental rmpect Report No. 88-1 and recertify Rnviro=entel Impact Report ho. 86-1 with a Ptotement of Overriding Considerations t prior to any action on Zone Change No , 88-11 and Use permit No. 88--25. ;. s A copy of the proposed request is on filer in the Department of Community Development* 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach# California 93648 , for inspection by the public. A" X MOM are invited to attend said hearing and eacpfoo 1ni ns dr submit 'svid0sce for or against the ap lication ` as outlii Above. All applications, exhibits, and degcrt tioins of this are on file 1with the Office of the City Cler o 2000 MaixiIrogiftmal treats Kuntington Beach, California , for inspection by the public* MMT3 OTION BEACH CITY COUNCIL By: Connie Brockway City Clerk Phone (714) 536--5227 Dated Nov. as 1988 (115od-14 ) • ' r i a� • ;' \N N-6 0. ®. i -n rn r { tY' J '�a ,�►! rn ca 4AIN ~^' s � c 21 Iy FA- G. 'a::zs: ems.: � d � � •, .M'�"' j �Q p 0 C 11! Q fit!•o Q i' , ��■/ —- pp y; + s yf' ' ��;H'�,i•�i. �rid,a: to < r k iw v , j, rT rJ`/4 ' ,tr'i-17, .i i r1 •Y . r r. i UNICATION V .Il*Pp d ', C ','�•,,r,rlr f'i FMmARTHUR J . FOLQFR ty + :Pk Acting City Attorney )NOtIr lon:,of. tho Public November la, 1988 4n : A*4 ndirneint 88-3A; I, and Code AmA �dxent 88-25 I bxWe examined the notification process use in each of the;. above matters and find thAt there is compliance with Atate and substantial compliance with city lodes and directives . A%ii matte, can, therefore, be hold on the scheduled date r' 'brie City Council without further notification. I. FOLGER F A ti g City Attorney AJV/g j c I '4$ t - y R i a ' �+ �dAh I rt s �I.�*"N..'y�T � *V1'� M r' .,�� �'�s�'�'••, � h r aa : " wh. >wy v 1 •4rl.r� �+r J� .,�. .�,�y 1.'''�,.l,l� HI•�',•� ; .,,�, tr'r SuE r w�•v ` Nw ! 0 094 . r r'J '�Q',•�' � � ,- rr.1/y� u y '• �/�.�,. ,S � r F! ; �. � 1 L i� A 14 'v' rf41r w yt�• `` TRECNTER OL x VER e 201 SRRINGFIELD q '"✓ HUNTINCTON SCM, A 92648 FIRST CLASS MAL '�• � thf,�,�hl,ih„I,�lt,�l�,,,lli • •emu•v:r 6 h • f 1 f' A E , i�iF;'hi ND' J F.', �'�INFj . CA r i'Z-I i �1 �; I c • h7FhY' f,'I'"� "1�t,1 w�`, ^, '1',rt .r�'i,A�r.i' •• A y Ot vk ', .!?„1r' ;'i ,c ,' (1•'�'1 y� �1 ', ,, ,, rr �fl, r�fl , � ' /�y � ,r Ff•'y,FF'' yM� � � ';yh m cc� i1, a ,t..A 1 °: t'f 'Tlx':1 } A�� Ts� •y r Y L� '1r is S•• 's 1. Ate.' ,v a ,� 'EI rYY'IF',f� 1 Y~ . Ih,,�r"' t 1, I!Yi•, Wrf� J 1 ,'7�' 7'4"• �'1 Sy' 1 ��, �✓•i.�'Qi' ,' A r, � rl� r, 1,, ly• - �1� ,"rf,,' r.rtirf 4 , i f!J ✓' •',r IrP 1 ' �''A r,{� 7. ! `h' ,M�y�"JH� �1'�'��' ��� � ,1���/'w �x'�a��°1":',' •';� z ',. �^„�r t,'ryf��, 1 + .,,� �� :! ;,���'"��'?� 1''� ' ( r , t r�;'h:w . � 4'. yI' :� ,� • r',' r�, ',}sir + ,�rl / ., fl .•'1 �� f ��•b►"� �, �r �1 !w y � AV 1 •4 l r 1 � 1 , , �•' ' y`'• I'� .,,�' ��yy.( . 11'+1 '� yr�••11M 1 • 1 ,� ' " �' i ''1h�r,, r n a �• ?i.... G_y ratiFyX• It+�`.1J_NA. 1 ''; y S'::. r r` d9S2 w!4FiNER AVE SUITE 3$$ HUNT the rON BCH, CA 9264 iFIND 60 PERMANSEN 7 16531 80L$A CHXC A ST '#312 LA .88 MAW HUNT IDE04CH CA Y2449--S596 rif.:Ti.lRN TO GENDER w ■ ,r .. • E'a+"Wh+'•FN CHA5 LES TR HIlN-f MiTIDN RCH, CA y 'i_,4� HE:RMAN N I ;> 1653J EQL SA CHICA 8 1 ' 0312 HUNT BEACH CA 596 FASt' CLASS MAL RETURN TO SErDER26 Q-3 I ��11111�11�1��1�1�tll�l�u1{Itllttl�le��{t�t�llli��� PO .mow .. r1r rr,M� T w".Y w w,.r • •• aw of"w4how"senh 1• 000 of d*or Oak 1lul ollipal fbttt*'CA ski H►. 14T INGTON SCH1 1-� HE.:rr*•.,J�, F"lJD TIME EXF ) if':KKAN ryEN FIRST CLASS MAIL. UNT�DENE14 !A SOLSA �9264'R-3553, 6 HUNT ��,�7'h *:'i lJRN '19 �;�FhJ�Ek !M, 1,• 11 111 1 . y M; i ,, .. *'0r1v, Y.fns c riA �'r.t 11 •r Y:1+l��,r ly M ,I}�' i '� .' a,f !' ;`�.yy��� i .c � �� Y i 1 w AIR '•w �!. � y,.,��.�a.� � r�{ ' A�4 �t F, r !rr, `Y�1 i' it p � ` yaon .; .L '1Nr ,• ti'�fY r r. i ,'r �P3 A Aw or 4,14 "�trfi .�rr. � ' )1r, n •.IM 'L * it r� r 1 .�' `i. ,L " 'i',� :� rim, � r u '�•` ,'t •'+. •k '' r f � rl�.,.r`N• dal d�; r,. � r�ih,7'MM wi-.iLLr."rr .r � �•'` r � 4' � � �•fF. L 1.V ^,!, •... 1�'.� a�n •/�•(♦yam ,Y yi, ♦ r•!�4� ..� • ?; .' 0 SOX 984 L.A M l RAGA , CA 905:38 I' 0LA*0A ?91A1171 FWD TIME L.XPD I / f BL.AKELY 1 • 1110T 1 3ANTA SARBARA L.N - 1`� � HUNTIhC�'TN lwtGN CA �i' 69�i''_ '�; �d!'°�..' ;; .,1•�,•'�✓`�dinlr'r1�r '�L,. .. i III�N� ��11�1��111II���11�11I1�I� RETURN 'TO GENDER L- � III of t P.& a" r CA •� Y S� i WERMAN:E'E N C HARLES TR dram: WARNE'R HUNT IIvr;'rbfq E�=�� �aF� :�: F 4'�HERMANSEN , 16533, r' EKILG �r f HUI�ITCH� AI'�F �i9' 9 '` 11-: URN TO SEUDER w� 1. r'r• nwrrwu�..� "i'+ � 943'4 IVAN A _ .�li•..� LONG S ;; li1111'1►111*11.1 still 1111illJhhAoll11flilfoil 1 i ���i�r>j .�ty� ,�� ;'` ,' � fy y' 1� •"f•� '1�,' (d T I P �� y�/rl �� � �. � ��, � rMJ'V� i j v �,� ,�1. '� r� , ,�•T' '��a )j irr��{�q T 3�, My 14T+1w, u,;y �� ,.. L �w � '' ••� '�-. � it 1 B�nC is��`•_ }��bn AA l,.y rr• �.l w ` X �.ir,. r } 7 j y r i r city of wwmpm .. •�! 1 1 1, 10 �11fft�el Mf mom*, Vill 19 pp co +t:,. ; ,:r!�:•t i roan ,.,,,�t suct !�a��1 A �•iAEw�f; GA ` rJF,,23 t FIRST CLASS Mle4L r'' 4 � T }�r% 1 ` Y� It • Y� f f"!Y e• y� I�I ' ,I,�` fVY h, Mn� + , Y ' . • \/, �•�W ', ' n• � �„ •ri.' {r�,."Y•+�� G7K h P.P'^ J I, " I I YQI "',Si 1• .t'I' � 1'll.i'�. , ��f,, � P ' '+,� „ � u �y f 1r1 a: ¢ '4 'fh"f AyA'Ii J.,� ^��� Ilr ,l"":;i�1' .,��r� �,.v`i!•y'�I' 4I'f���'!�:I•�M�"�,. �T �fjf + p 1_ war,' r�T rru SHE �� TR7N UGH, CA .000 ;Wool tFIRSrk` CLASS MAIL w w... • i •.r OR T • r OWAWON W mml CA UM 7;',.. - I 02 14 o All UGELI C I L I.gip M `4 Ir 71 t� �i�,EANH I LL C 1, cs,w�✓ 648 CA 92 HUNT T NGT FASTCLASS MAIL Ohba— wr+r Iwo. CIA If ,i KELTrR cm' "51 FWD r•IMF- IWJS DR 7' k f'UN CACIq A •�� -� CA KETURN 14 if,C J'y NG-rt�tq CA r` 1 FST CLASS w1, �. ! _, ,�� r, W.y ,'I • ��Vl� 1 1��J ���n� ' r������� ��SUM [ i,,>r!F rr S• ,{ r � 47 cob ka, Vdltb '-►�; ;tit �.,�'�� r1 ;, 4„ -, ', �., ' 1. »,1 , . 3 + �i^j..i� � ��a� r Vr, ors, �F i�j '• i d �M ,4 .�"'"�'''�' .i', '�l��h:j7�7,4^.�'!�•).4nK"1!�'V � "M r"':••1�lir'" .,�,: �T:,. r •�R.i } a r r„ , I , C IF I 44 ONY Of Offfm of do OtV Oink iN AIMf 1 1` e A SS �r JJ1 r 0- M— -Ti,e, , ,W hmm h a4�'4 I X HOMEOWNE'11.s + r LON6 PCIj , �'ar � j P00%'. fe {. FIRST CLASS MAIL r « « r Al ii..�.. �.w.tMi F •�A YA{�,/,� r V ,,1 a F r r; - CF_C - CF-E-CC *-'- - -o- 4 RA R2 C2 o - CF-E-C , o R2-0 Rz R2 -L -ao-o p tow— W41 jj �z-a or-a N W-* -o � -o -a a -o 1 now -ao CF-R NOR a o o O • 0r• }{ RI-OIL E m: RI RM .�.++ uwa i `► 1 -a -4 mac- 0 � a may, 'Z RI Rl CF-E -a t Ml Vow'- . . A ..fir Jr ARM f ; t • * — i k14f4 ,,*�„' l ,, `5. ri '; i'r ^. .I.`tl +r 1 • y " �.I.F Tr ,'/1 . o I .itO r' i NOTICZ OF PUBLIC KMING (COST. ) t i, • On Octobor 18, 1988 the planning Commission approved E &rW reCosse aged adoption of gone Chang• No. 86-11, approved Use Permit go. 88-25 and approved and r tided certification of Supplemental R t0 t At&1 INP$Ct Report No . 88-1 and Rnviramontal Impact Report Me . 86-1 with a 4tatoment over tiding Considetations x Thb City Council is required to certify as - ads u a to Su lernent a 1 8nvi ronment a i impact g P p �P . Report No. 88--1 and recertify Environmental Impact Report No. 88-1 with a Statement of Overriding Considerations grior to anyqaction on Zone Change No 4- , 8-11 and U it No. 88-25 . A copy of the proposed request is on file in the oepaztment of ConsMnity Development, 2000 Main ` Street, Huntington Beach, California 9264b, tar inspection by the public. � J1 1L I MOM .:ERSORS ate invited to attend said hearing and expross opinions\.. or submit evidence for or against the application at , outl! t►bavk . All applications, e*hibita , and descriptions of thi#jaroet, • . �al are on file with the Office of tite City Clark, 2000 tt Huntington Beach, California, for inspection by the pnb��Q. HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL By: Connie Brockway City Clerk Phone (114) 536-5227 Dated .14Mv. d r 1988 I ` (11506-14) h 'F5 1 i'Vf"?T"•Y�' i ,� , ',1 ''� p}u ��!. 11` 4^ ,. 1 Y'i, yj JI •F � 77 3 y A � h H 4 rrs, r"?;i 1, • ,ii' t r9; Publish Nov . 10, 1988 Appeal to planning Commission' s Approval of Zone Change Ao. 8S-11/Use permit Ito. 80-25/ suppX ntal Sn*lronmeatsl impact Report No. 88-1 �+ and UVAt0nmental impact levart 06-1 (5priN#gfield Oil Recovery Project) �yry bOTICN I$ Hffian8Y GIVEO that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hel arinq in the Council Chamber at the Huntington ftach Civic Center, 2000 Blain Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the ' d*to aid at the time Indicated below to receive and consider the - st4temonts of all persona who wish to be heard relative to the applidstion described below. f � Way. °" �j• Monday, Wovenfdr 21, 1985 7 : 00 PH �s Appeal to Planning Commission ' s Approval of tone Change No. 68-11/Use permit No . 88-r25/Supplementa►l Environmental Impact Report No . 89-1 and Environmental Impact Report No . 86-1 ,ems Angus Petroleum Corporation 1. Councilw-ornan Grace Winchell 2 . Concerned Citizens for Huntington Beach The project site consists of two blocks located on opposite corners as follows (See attached map) : . flog-k a fli jC,t 127&U: bounded by Springfield Avenue, Delaware Street, Rochester Avenue and California Street ; and Bock g_(_.ate 6) : bounded by Toronto Avenue, California Street, Springfield Avenue and Neatin0ton l��i1 zap Cbonr�: Rezone Block A (Tract 1.2747) from *Cldtown Specific plain-District Trio-Oil facilities (OT-2-00 to "Cldtown Specific 'Plan-District Two-Oil Favilities wit?, Oil Drillinq (OT-2-01)" to allow the drilling of new oil wells. Use ,larmit: To develop an oil r.onsolidation drillsite on Block A and associated oil facility on Black B. Also requested is a reduction of exterior s Veyard s&tbacps from ten ( 10) feet to a minimum seven (7) feet for the north and south elevations of moth blocks . (1150d-:3) '... f f. r;�'y' J"�W?.,/T ,`'h,: 4rt` ,s,*vFJ 1M M �1 �•�1' �Yi '+S'l f'96 ' �'1i h � J�, �/. 4 a AV } �r b r� 9 xyl, ,J�1• {{ ` + i .� ��,+. �� _ �' 'Il v}1i4�n'��V�.'N� r sr . r r F wt ti 'I, l {v ,it I TTT 1^•. J 14 op 1 f l t, i yr•• aa � v 1il � l KOTSC NATAL I E 4.1 P w HUNT INGTON BCdil��." \' 1 FIRST CLASS MAC. � ((� �� y• 16� `r � M`C�'�1�.A�' ,,',N, r'. � rF , � T,'lr:� _•_. t� P 7 r f • .� I�1 hYF1 r J'R'r �, Ir, .�^ * 14 � MY `,JAY .{�•!`^�` � � � �,'� f • 'i r 1. Nrtlo� of HWdo" • K led F� wlili1I11 ftgmk CA OW Y �132 HOW 10 F T CLASS MA& fii;:T'll��lAt 7(J �iE='t}I:i!;:1"c' rllJ I�•C)Fi'M'►RO:I:iSJG Llt AD"L_I:: O F'C?Rinl(iRC gklyN C::* • r�w i +• 5 Vic• l , " y I � 44 J So. •� t l fS, CIA i ! .t f ,17` TUi•�;► "yt Ar'•�+}• Y1`�1�# �z ''r'r'ar�L�'r•i' y �� ,��{,F J '�'•� 1" `� w';+t• t :v w, 1 • I+� I�3 L'1'•', '7�i1, � y '}�µ�.'J�'flA►�� �J ��:�����` ,��,4 w �� ��M i 11 •M 1• }.. • P N �r �• �� fib ry ' 3WHARrZ I r.?.HAI 21264 BEACH BLVD Huwr I NG TON 804, A 92648 F mom ai r., ;,.• I-rA 5,q 07164�N 1 1/16e s-w RET ' N TO SENt�l-�R NO FORWARD NC, QRDCR ON t, IIf1111811 mlfilIt11111I M •�. I .+.rdrwr� •-+�-l��IMI�AW ....rd.,.+.�wY.....r...�.a-.+L...� 0.06,, .R... .... .••.JYt s., ..�. ..._..L-.._.._.. .. .._._�. .. •--+�.�.+r+..��r..... Lr ;i Plotter • C���� �rrrlf •• � . -, ill' o 1llr Cky Owk N1MIMi wAm fir„CA ISM NG OX'XR EXPIRED 1612,20 RANCH I TA Cif TX 75248 � FPST CLASS MAIL ��% � tltf,bll�t►Ilfitlftiil�l�,fllfl,��ttllflllltf11/llll met'" +Q11�i!ri+IMr4 �Ntrit•, elk 0 tiF�TI "" 1R I M )ER f=: DALLA-zo , 1':( 7`) 4,.:, ' FIRST CLASS MAIL ��' , lilfl�!�l�fillllilllllllllltli1ht1111t/l1�'�1��fi�� � 1 p r y rA ',���' L .hyt. r +r� �h1�r 1� : :..) •�,•yr' y 1 rx,, •l ` : �M �,�� 'M /' .. (/ ;p;.. rl `'i}f ysd�C�H�f'I, "' :r� ', ����1.�:i�:,�R1Fi! R•^�, �;,1�•;•'�"'p;�ii'�, �„r R ` i awl 9434Afton C RO I X HOMEOWNER-S LO FORO T CLASS MAC. II ,1 1Offts of ft cut ft* Huntington Bach r t 3 s - '►� �f 1; Isq CAL MI 1 'Re , NOV • 1 ! • r•. M AV . 4 .4 A U SUM Su Chun t. i .4 �;�`:��► 901 Huntington St. ! � Huntington Beach, CA 92648 , S rye, �' .• r t;� .� Y �MN'YM.A`Mr rl.',,,'yyrry,ti.•�,.y r .. PRU I TVil ps , 92648 too CA% i %AlA88 MAL .0. '';'J � FIrm1 , A. 02503431 ijt y 11r7 JNT ING,rON BCH, cA ST CLAISS MA ckv a 1. . New, ,- �ioN jovdign sit OW*CA OW A .�',i� Y '• ' �, is . . � r 4r . r(/ 0 ISA �HILL D i i ;EAi' C A ' 'ail Ht.lN T I NGTON � N " LASS MEAL aV ,S•n,J` � •♦ Y � t L I Not ' iyr-,_�� "��i.a a..�rh r��r,i..w.�.� ..,ra+w��.w/.• .,� �f� ,'..+\ , ,. k;1 + i�iwIr I 1 "L• Y � ' •� HUNTING CA 92648 f 1• r FAST CLASS MAiL 1 1 • I . '::L`3'�.[aq:i'.•.Ms'K r+:.:,.w,.ia,•-wtYr:ar•. .C-:.�/IC�.",f __ I I Ls l NMI" y: � 1 � P�" ter':-�-+'++ II • AkZ 01 r 1 ' CA L 2 3 +r HUNTING CA 926A8 � FIRST CLASS MAL w w r • ...� - ,i��r�L-��M.r.�a���,LT•.�:.;�.�....._,a' - �u,r.r�..rwr.�r`■�� city of=" Io0wo of Go Ckv Ow* set*CA 2210 �r h aA ' •�� f WNT I N ST CLAWS MAIL Y ' `',hl s` w i e 4 4 A, lk 04 i C� C, a s tit44 J� . , so- mooVo, ;Z��! GOP -...-ftu i6dO 4 04 Svo lop 00 ot i 4 �. N�4 �s � �a Z , 14 Cumulative Impacts 37 Findings Regarding Alternatives 41 3 . 1 No Project Alternative 41 3 . 2 Reduced lateneity Alternative 42 3 . 3 More lutense Drilling Prolgram 43 :3 . 4 Abandonment of All ail Production Sites 44 3 . 5 Alternative Sites : Parcel 1 45 3 . 6 Parcel 1 Development Only 46 3 . 7 Alternative Sites : Parcel 2 47 3 . 8 Alternative Sites : Parcel 3 46 3 . 9 Alternative Sites : parcel 4 49 3 . 10 Medium Density Residential Project 50 i f .l .SAC I-1A ,SUPPORT 9FLIJIMIEU N 1r, &Ulm..ZZ AL IMACT MM IL in, T��OgATION $ �'JGTOI�I C�. —CALLA OIL M_ a xy RIIxECT �' Q CSAIriCE.. U-11 - VSz PERMIT 88,- 06-1 SCa 110 , 860409,17 The State Guidelines (116-jidelinew") promulgated pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CSQA") pra�-ide : (a) ti% Uilic agency shall approve or carry out a fro ec% for which an EIR hie been completed which deatificq one or more zi nificant environaental effects of .the project unless the public a envy . makes one or more written -findings for eac�, of 40 those 'usignif icant effects , accompanied by a -brief explanation of the -rationale for each , ,. finding . The possible findings are : ' (1 ) Changes or alterations have been required , in, or incorporated into $ the ptoJect Which avoid or substantially lessen the � significant environmental effects as Identified in the final RIR. f1hil finding AMU he AILUtd tO aft all ifldina (2 ) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public egency and not the agency raking the 3nding. ,Such changes hays been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. C1hill finding rhail Jig refertad tq._r.as r.• �..w r.r ' (3) 5pecifit economic,, social . or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project altRxnetives identified in the final Slit, (Guidelines LA section 15091 . ) 5954 i +rr 1 LTh a f'ndiX1&._ ahAll be r0 erred to ,fit 11 f ind i1t .r� The Zn,vi ronmental Impact, Report ("EIR11 ) for the oil recovery project ("Pro act" ) Proposed b Angus Petroleum Corporation ("Pry ect Applicant") tdwntifies significant effects on the enviroment which nay occur as a result of, the Project . fiijCtign—i of this At t F ihment identities the significant environmental effe►t is :I)f the Project ohi ch cannot feasibly be mitigated to a leavel of significance . Uctigu . 2 vote forth poteuti. 91 environmentx effects of the Protect which are not significant because of the design off" the Protect or which can feasibly be mitigated to a level of insignificance , Sectim l summarizes the alternatives discussed in the EIR . .Sec''im 4 consists of a statement of Overriding Considerations which sets forth the City ' s specific reasons for finding that the benefits of the Project outweigh its unavoidable environmental effects . The findings met forth in each section t.re supported . by fir;Mingv of facts established in the administrative record of the Project . i I i Z . 11 � y• 1 i 1 x The City has determined that ZIP mitigation measures and proposalai included xs pavt of the project will result in a substantial mitigation of the fo' 1owing effects , but that theme effects canct feasibly be mitigated to a level of i.risignificance . 1 , 1IN r 1 . 1 . 1 Signif i.Cant ZrIectl The neighborhood surrounding the Project Sate consists of medium density residential uses , predominantly in small. (8-•10 unit) developments and sin le family residences . Views of the Project Site from ad recent residences swill consist of the screening block wall and landscaping . During the initial dtillin phases , drill rigs will be visible . During the roduct on and injection phasas , temporary drill ri a gill e used periodically for maintenance and will be visible from adjacent residents . Tanks will be visible above the wall . The City hereby makes findings (1 ) and (3) The following measures will result-in a substantial reduction of the adverse impacts of the identified significant effect . (a> The Project shall comply with the landscaping rnuirements of Chapter 15 . 22 of the Huntington Beach ordinance Code . (b) ` All- t-teen shall- be a minimum 1-of 24-f nch...._..box type, and spaced 'no sore than 20 feet on center . (c) LAndscap4ng and the construction of skasoury wailer and street improv6aents shall occ•u: concurrent with excavation and construction . (d) ;Well service rigs shall be operated no more than 48 days peer year , and no more than 4 Well service rigs may be on the site at any one time . These ,service rigs shall not mood 120 loot it height . (0) Drilling derricks small not exceed 165 feet in heiltb*- , Upon completion of initial drills of Wection s►ai yraducot wells o all drilling teigs shall be removed from the *its . 3 . 5954 I I i .. M 1r 1� 1 (f) The enclosure of bott, parcels of the Project Site will provide the most direct mitigation of visual � iw %ncts . Surrounding the drill site with an Acoustical '+ wall will provide a more aesthetic viewshed . ti (g) During the Initial drilling phasas , when drill rigs a, o visible , the drill site shall be surrounded by an acoustical wL11 and portions or the rig will be acoustically wrapped . (h) The Y'acts in SuppoKt of Finding 2 . 6 , addressing 13gh't and glare , hereby are incorporated by reference . (J ) The ,Project requires the drilling of 30 to 45 wells from the drill site . These wells shall be located withir the fenced and landscaped drill site and the wells sbal l be concealed from view . (j ) The topoirayhy of the Facility Site would be substantially lowered to reduce the height of the storage tanks . (k) These mitigation measures Included within the Project Design and imposed by the Use Permit will substantial3.y reduce the aesthetic impacts of the Project . Nonetheless , the Project will result iii a change In the views from adjacent residences , because of the addition of a 30-foot sound barrier wall and a 165-foot � drilling derrick. This , is an unavoidable adverse impact of the Project . 1 .2 . 1 S i if J cant #" t.%t: 'Under a worst case scenario , assuming thet__A11 ._gi.l tanks are full and the tanks are set out in an open fie d iiithUut _ suirraundiin* _64ri- ietik:f walls-, there is a "rare" (defined in the standart methodology for risk assessment as 1 : 10 , 000 to 1 : 1 . 000 , 000 chan,;sp that an oil tank fire could result in radiant beat effecting the area outside of the imediate Project Site . Findint2l: The City hereby snakes findings (1) and (3) ' The following measures will result n the substant al reduction of the adverse Impacts of the identified significant effect ! (a) Oil handling facilities will be lowered -to six feet below the l evol of the su r round ng streets . This wasurs, coupled with the eight-foot. vall , will 4 . mom very significantly reduce any "radiant heat hazeid footprint , " which in calculated using no containment whatever . (b) Oil will ty whipped on a continuous biesis . Therefore , only a minimal amount of oil will be required to be held ,in the tanks . Only three on--cite crudi oil tanks are permitted , and thes-� tanks shall never be completely full at once . i (c) Prior to the issuance of bui.ldin , &rmit , a preliminary emergency action plan (LO) shal-I be prepared and submitted . A completed LAP, based on an-built plans , shall be completed and submitted prior to the start of oil production operations . '*he LAP shall include employee training and periodic practice , how spillage onto streets from Site would be hand] !d , the safe handling of any chemicals anti/or sateriale , and full knowledge of all systems and %;zergency equipment . A copy shall be on file at the T:.3re Department and updated every five year• . In additic.at a Spill Prevention aad Control and Counte,-smersuras (SPCC) plan in compliance with City requirements for handling of spills , etc . , not otherwise covered in the ZAP shall be completed and filed with the City prior to the start of oil production, operations . (d) The facts in Support of Finding 211 . 2 , relating y. fo fire prevention/protection, hereby are incorporated by ceferunce . f i (v) Al though the likelihood of this Impact occurring � is extremely low, if it did occur , the impacts would be signifiesant . Therefore , it is considered a significant unavoidable impact . 1 . 3 JZI SMI C T AC 1 . 3 . 1 significant "fact ; if an earthquake of M S . 0 or reater cn the Richter Scale occurs with its epicenter in he Project Area, structures in the Project Area, including tanks and wail@ of the Project fatilitiee , could be damaged . : Thu City hereby makes findings (1 ) and (3) . -An subpart of *ind�L: The following seasurew w 11 result -in a •uastantial reduction of the adverse impacts of the identified significant effett . ,•� 5964 1 i (a) The Project engineering will Drevent the ;,ell i cellare from being damaged , Even n an M 8 eaithqusko . � b) Oil will be ehipped on a continuous basis , sr) that all of the tanks in the oil storage area will never be full at the name time , Only three on-site crude oil tanks art permitted and these tanks shall never be completely full at once . The oil storage area is located six feet below grade , and the area is surrounde ' by reinforced concrete retaining walls . The volume of this depressed retaining basin exceeds the Uniform Fire 'ode , and Division of Oil and Gas requirements , by, a factor of 1 . Even if the retaining wall ii ruptured , the retaining area would hold oil released by tanks which burst or overturn . (c) The f`ac.ility would shut downi under a "fail-safe,, system , as soon as the power went off during a major earthquake . No emergency situations would be created requiring immediate attention by, or an aulpeatttion of , public safety persoftnel . i (d ) 'soils enAlysis and fault line investigatiomw were performed to determine if near surface faulting is present v,lthin the Drill facility Site Areas , The resultant study cc-�.cluded that no faults or related fracture Zones were observed in the trench exposures . f 1 Accordingly , an active fault limp is not known to be iresent within the trench limits . The fault line nvestigation rarport shoe that no faults were found . (e) Although the above measures Would prevent the creation of an emergency situation during 'an earth cake of M 8 or greater , no known engineering or other mitigation -. measures .could avoid_ damage to the Facility if such a major earthquake occurred . in conjunction with damage that would occur to the surrounding arrea , this is a significant unavoidable impact of the Project . 2 . .� I WIRQ FNTAL EFF CS WHY Gil ARE JjOT S AU..�4 SCH CAN�.. 112 MIXXC;,=;?,,. TALZYEL of DANCE The City has determined that the following effect: will not be . eignif icant , for the reasons stated below. 1 . 1 'Pi! OG M- ,S QZLS AM MUM 2 . 1 1 PQt n iA , tom. Development of the Project will alter the exiating topography of the Drill Site and Facility Site . The existing surface of the ground on the 6 . , •wew Drill 111te will be Sraded and recompactod to sNbetpntiolly follow the contours of the abutting etrgato , . fmcavetion to a depth of approximately l2 feet will be ,required to per® t conptraction of t��++.res subsurfa►co well oe►l�rrp The topopaphy of the Facility Site will be 1oyered app,roximstely two 4 est below the street e1avation9 on the south and vast &rid sire feet below the stroot elevetiong on the northeast corner , in order to reduce the beight or tbt storage tanks . Ifindints : The City hereby Makes finding (l) gu.t.0[.._i n sustoort..t of tindialij- (a) The Project Site currently cousisto of two parcels , which are vacant except fpr eaietin o'ti 1 production facilities and well pun p I . The vaCoat arm of the parcels are covered with filter ilep fro* prior ,:onbtruction activity . aacause the existint top repyy of the Project Site is disturbed and covered with Vilae of dirt , the effects of Srading are net significant , (b) The surface can be reptored at the and of the Project ' s life span . Prior to tarxinatiml of the oil oper.;.xion. a plan @hall be submitted for the review and Approval of the Fire Qepartmont Bnd pevelpppent Fervicep Department . showing how the $its will be abp►n4on4d end restored to its closest natural otato . (c ) All loose upper soils Within the foundetigp areas for process equipment on the Faoility Site should be removed and replaced at compacted $ill . rpundation area• for the well cellare on the Drill Site* shall be overexcavated a minimum of two f9pt V#rt3ge*Jy and three feet horizontally and replaced by compacted fill . Superficial fills near the CellArs should be resopYtd and replaced as compacted fill . 2 . 1 . 2 ZotentiAl, Zftar .: sand surface sob*idong4 has occurred in the Huntington Beach arse, with # Heger subsidence area tau hly correlating with the limits of tho 8untintton Beath Oil Fidld . AccordlnS to the Jast leveling - survayy for the XVnti t4A J1eeCh Pip $tetign Located near the interarectipn 6t Allows Avenl4s and peed Boulevard , the subsidence in the projeot Ara* it wOr l to -0 . 2 feet for the period from 1916 through 1906 . Th¢ Current 'evefaCe rate of eubeidonct per yeer ie approximately �p. af feet . . The City haroby des g1ndjaS (1) . 7 . 5964 r GdUb 1� , (a ) Several reporte indicate that the rate of ouleiderce has decreased Mince water floodin of oil produc in zot,es was initiated in 1959 . The DI vi s i on of Oil and tan (1973) reorts that the maycimum recorded rate of subsidence was 0. 19 feet per year from 1955 to 1965 , but decreased to 0. 05 feat per year from 1968 to 1972 . (b ) Uperience in other oil fields , such as wi lapin ton , shown that represaurization of the oil produc ng zones through water injection has caured reduced rite- of aubsidence and often has completely halted subsidence and even caused from rebound (c ) Based on the studies by the Division of Oil. and Gas and eryerience in Wilmington , cited above , the inflementatiion of the Project will not increase • Pu aaideoce , and ebould reduce the rate of subsidence , in the Project Area . Z, i .3► fttent al . f9 In three cases , oil field operations or other fluid injection activitiox have been � docveented as relatin to induced seismic movements . In the Milmiri torn Fielf, California , several small ,# I paboldence- induced earthquakrR occurred . In the U. S . Rocky Mountains Arsenal , Colorado, a series of earthquakes .. wLs caveed by fluid emplacement in a liquid waste disposal project . In an rail reservoir at Rangely Field , Colorado , VLter injection c-per.ations resulted in induced seismic ' sYavemQnte . ] nga: '"he City hereby makes findin (1) . ZACUiD .5UR.RQr_t91 ind naa ; (a) Mote of the above situations is likely to occur at the proposed site . The Project is a grater injection which will not cause subsidence . The facts in j,roject , part of Finding 2 . 1 . 2 hereby are incorporated by reference . (b) The stocky Mountain Arsenal and Rangely eartkqu*ke(e in Colorado occurred in hard brittle rock. %%I s sock is geologically different from the young otd iasents of the Los Angeles basin . (c ) Ric:o-eazthquake monitoring wyeteme , dtsigned to at evrately locate small , shallow eatthqualt ee that .sight be anerated by oil operations , have been in operation about i years in the vicinity of Inglewood and 'Wilmington oil i 1 ' 1 1. w, f ields . Ito earthquakes have been located in either field or in nearby fields , that would indicate oil operations to be a causative factor . 2 . 2 MIROLOU , ID 1 HAGE An WAIF,QUALIZI 2 . 2 . 1 Rotentimil u: Storm water runoff will be increased because the existing permaable land surface will be decreased by approximately three acres of lands resulting from the pevi.ng of the Project Site with asphalt . Undinve : The City hereby makes finding ( 1 ) . nfJLR in 59nn zt of Ifindinga : (a) The increase in storm water from paving the Project Site will not have negative impacts on the existin stone drain system because the Project hao been designel to utilise all on-site stoma water runoff for water injection, purposes . (b) The construction of new half-section streets with � concrete curb and gutter will alleviate the prevent water pondiag problems along the City right-of-way . (c ) Surface drainage , including storm water , on the Drill Site shall be diverted to catch basins , thor. by gravity Mow via underground pipeline across the street to � the facility Site . The water will be collected in saiad interceptor No. 1 and then pumped into the water proceeming area , filtered and mixed with the production brine and injected into the oil bearing zone as art of the ester flood . The interior of the Facility Site will ba partially parrid with -asphalt over --a rock base -and the remaining portion will be paved with crushed rock. The majority" of itora� water and surface drainage will in iltrate into the soil through the crushed rock. Any reseainin storm water and surface drainage will be col.11eetel in catch basins , diverted �,j the sand in4traceptors and then follow the same process as water from the -Drill Site. (d) In the event of a poorer failure durifte a y.oC--year sto�rw, am emeatgency valve could be opened on Facility Site and all stone water could be directed via gravity lion pipeline to Well Cellar• A and X. When the cellars are atrial; filled , water will flow to a three-stage clarifier , then , if necessary, via pipeline to the County storm drain in Delaware Street . Cellars A and 8 have been bpecifically is"tnearod to perforw as additional p ' 5954 +MN. clarifIerd for this emergency use . 2 . 2 . 2 fir' t .... i�. .�, � The original E1R stated that; produced water or make--up water would be released to the sanitary rewer eystem . This is no longei the case . Injection water vill not release; to the sanitary serer ey9tem . I'.iudinu : The City Hereby awakes finding (1) . (a) All water used for injection into the underground oil reservoirs will be obtained from the following sources : storm water runoff ; produced water from the production wells ; and make-up brine rater (water to initially fill, the underground reservoirs ) purchased from Chevron U. S . A. At present Chevron U. S .A . is treating and releasing the make .up brine water into the sanitary sewer system. Use of the brine water for injection purposes will initially reduce the existing load on the sanitary sewer syetem by approxim&tely 30 , 000 barrels per day. (b) All brine produced with the oil still normally be � cleaned by circulation through sand filters and settling 1 tanks and will then be reinjected into the formations . 1 1 (t) In the event of a complete electrical failure , all ,production wells will go down, and there will be no produced water , The Mow of make-up water will be stopped at the source . The water filtration system will include reserve capactty to allow for continued operation during equipmert maintenance or repair . if a longer time period in needed to make repairs or to replace auipment , make-up water will, be reduced and/or - a partial agutdomi of - -high water-cut production wel,is will be implemented . . 2 . 2 . 3 FotentiAl EffEct ! The d-rillia; Of the wcl1s for the project will in:-olve penetrating both shallow and deep roundwater acquifers to gain access to oil -bearing layers elow, resulting in -otential adverse effects on J groundwater . i IlAdIng.g: The City hereby sakes finding (1 ) . ZjkCti. n SURRar�}__.F leg : The fol.loving measures will mitigate the identified impact to a level of insignificance . ' (a) The water found in the shallow and . deep groundwater acquifers is . for the most part , brackish. 10 . .�; # ti + L Mob w'Y Y } Potable water hen been extracted fxom acqu i-fezN in Uie Huntington 3ea.ch area , although usual:y only in arear:� emet of the Newport-In lewrood Yault , The Pro jt:ct Site is neat of the fault and ts , in fact , located between two brancheo of the fau:.t . The Injection of water and extraction of oil in the oil-boating etrata will not have a significant effect on the quality of grounduater b:ica�iss the water currently is not usable for either domestic or induotCal uses . (b) State Division of Oil and Gao Regulations roqui re that the vase of all fresh water sands that are penetrated be protected from salt water invasion from bzilow by cementing . The Division of Oil and Gag will. require that water test be performed to assure proper seals were formed , The Use Permit requires that pipe string cementing through fresh water-beating sancta shall he implemented to prevent saltwater intrusion into the • acquifars . (e) During drilling operations . the drilling fluid which is Circulated 'n the well board to remove cuttings forms a membrane mrour►d the bore hole wall and inhibits teeter infiltration in,.,o the forme*tions Vhich have been penetrated . The area of water infiltration from the drilling mud is usually nc more than a few feet; in diameter . 2 . 2 . 4 Z.2trntiA J_E Wt: Mahe-up water will be transpo:rted to the Protect site through a pipeline . If the pipeline ruptured , brine could be released . The City hereby dakee vinding (1) . Facto in Sanart cat 21m 4 v,e: The f of low in - - weasures will mitigate 'the iderstifietd i.mpalct to a level of ins igrif icarce . (a) The: make-up water pipeline will be buried approximately 30 inches below the street surfacer measured from the top of the pipe . The pipeline to above the groundNater surface and will not encounter any surface water . (b)* The pipeline will be monitored with automatic shutdown pressure sensors so that any sudden pressure drop wrill trigger an slarm and shut: down the transfer pumps , This will insure tbst any release o1 wa-cer is arinin&l . 5954 r.rr• (c) Fact ( a) in Support of find ?-al `r , 2 . 3 , relating the r- al.ity of groundwater iii the Area, he:eLy is incorki.ratgd by reference . l , 3 . 1 Zotftntl I Xf t: The development of approximately 3 . 1 acres of the Project Site w,111 destroy needy species on the Frroject Site , F,Udingg : The City hereby makes finding ( 1 ) (a) The Project Site 1r currently disrupted , containing piles of dirt from earlier construction activities . No cultivated or native species exist on the site , except for weedy plants , Landscaping will replace all vegetation lost during grading and add additional vegetation. (b) No rare or endangered wppecies are known or expected to greed on the project Site , To U011 06TCAL ASS01MCAS 2 . 4 . 1 LooLt;. � : The gradiam of the Project Site and excavation, for foundations and well callars will > disturb anyundiscovered archaeological Vnd paleontological rerouTces . F ,, a: The City hereby makes finding (1 ) . L Rom.,gyp t of Findings : (a) There is 11ttle 1 ikelihood •a3� undiscovered tescurces on the Droject Site , The majority of the known &rcha•eologfcarl sites it, the City are located along the bluffs alobg the banks of the Santa Ana and San Gabriel Rivets . The two archasoio ical sites nearest the Project Site are approxInately 0 . and 1 mile away f root whe i Project Site . (b)•• iring rading and excay.Atiou, earth moving trews shall ,obsery ru a and spoils for potential archaeol+---gicel f1nds . - In the event of a potential find being located , o etatione Mha11 be suspended until tho eiSniticance of the find is , detexrained . bri* project Will be conditioned through the 'Use Permit to follow spec if i ed p►tocedutes in the event that remains are located , 12 . ; rrllr y i , coned 'Old :ow, ;pec i f J c Vian" L%7i *tri;:t: 2 ) . combined Oq'rx Oil grodvction (C) . The 11011 Oil District prohibits J.iXXin . in order, to implemerit the "taject. , a aon:,: charege frOW "0" to "Oil, Oil District is required . E -: The City Lm.reby makes finding ( 1 ) , (a) Section 9682 of Arriclo 966 of the GityyIs Zoni:,Z Codo provides for thee3tablishment of 1101 " Dfatricte, The only limitation for such an 01 District iq that of a r~ inimus euA:Zace area (100 feet by 150 feet) , as requirj cd by section 9CS2. , 1 . The propo3ed drill ante for the: Pxojtct is conai,derably larler than the sninlmum dimensions requi&end by section 9582 , 1 . Aberrefore , it is corpistent; with this provieinn . W Section W2 . 2, 3eAuixes dedication , tor an 1 � 3rrevoc&ble offer of dudicataon, of all real propertiv that: the City way require for its sfreeta and other public, servicm tacilitl�ee or impsovewerate . All City-required dedicntiona will be implemented through. the tense of recorded tract: mans for tht project site . Therefore , the project: iq coiinieteut with thia provision. d .5 .2 ZS9,S t,iA1J_ The project zoaiag mast be conni atent with the Huntington Beach General Plon . According to the General Platt , "consistency bete:een Ube VonIn.g proposal and tht Gezeral Pl► n wonid be determined by convil Bring all the policies and programs of each element of the General pAan and their relationship to the proposed zoning , " L : The C.1Ly hermby makr3 finding (1) . the, Icllowing policies of the Central Plan apply to the Pioiect . The gro,ject is coneietent: with these policies for the reraeort stated b+elost. (A)" i' ILC�N2 ZjL send Cog at at� ALL 09:2Jtt t A...,.. ...��: ''Mccurag ing berautificition of oil r, c mg Akreaa ' restoration of non -productive oil s,nd s � 'the ProRe *111 remove 01i. producing facilition from 6 Sites , }her tby per iit�Aog the i restoration of oil sites 13 . 1 k �ft_�K �"i.�:' x;' �.'' , I ?,t , . t.•. !� .1.t: l:ti)11f�,�t ill .�. ''il- Od1.1CiT1� ► W ;.1 c,11 :.1)c Pi:o + e z 1)eararlr_e 1 • . . . . �s; , tl i :t; � f.�' !" � �, fi)fs ; �i1�► i' : '':'�'(,� ��`✓�"' 1 '� '�7 �:1 � )E'llt r ,� k t.CiT►t1 l9tent; With 'C.hi ri AreaFE '' t t . t.'!s'. t1+t'k:- ;; u i r d Pi: -Ior ty A>; eall ►► defined as ► l,�":`".�ii l; . i A°; r:. !. i, '`i %� .l 1 °�A7 _�'. �' ,c I;'' 1:2 (n of I£e a i° j WI i c I F'IIo11.a.ci tl(". in(-or- rated into a ;:;,�;11�,7 i t.'h?'�11!? 1 t'�� � 1 i;'�!I 1 ii�`k4�`, :� ;'..l�.i l:V 11 b +t?i' "�cal':�U t 1 1.'li lJ�L'�,.ti1 . ►► I f 'She F7:of ec t s i t e i.A) not incl udf!d 1i :any Adort !d Open Space oi. Conservation Frog- am. F „Minc-ral �esourcea" are l isi:O ac a "Second Priority 'f R;. cas , " accompanied bar a po�1 =Cy t:n "encourage utilization of wealth ; prevei,t: blight , pol''tat i on , &nd undue deet ri.;1~.t ion of natal:&I featurcp . " ,titre .�o;,tc:t: will ease secondary recovery techniques tr, i>nereate the efficiency o:L oil production . As conditioned and mitigated , the Project. will not. add to blight or pollution . The v)",)re , the Prr) j ect iv conL i ete>nt with this Policy. ' ids ► 1X_ � ,��;:�e StQ -ex-y JDDL—PI.A& "The plan encompasses i.11 evi st ing and planned open space and conperw.►i; lon programs well as veveral. additional ,fro y ecte . '' (General Flair at p . 16 . ) No open space developmerik:s , open apace flan areas , or scenir'; corridors are deai gua►ted on the Project: Site or within the subsurface Project: Area . The lMcCallen Park site , the nearest identified site , it two blacks to the not th of the site , Ilituxt - Flood IImArjl.._Bx.au-L The Project site is located in Zone C , "Minimal Flooding , " Therefore , the Project is not in a flood hazard area . 5 cticin... ,..J,, -L "Continua to require geologic investigations of all significant development projects and to atipulate by Conditione of Approval that all construction within those projects be designed to withstand predicted probable ground motion accelerations . " 14 . t pvojec"�, sty:uctvres W..11 be designed to withtitand prtdic:ted p;oiyable grourd ,potion acce.ler it j onip . Therefore , the Project is r.onsintent with this policy . .� .�4 _ ,:.. ,.,,.,. _►. "Goal. : To redoce tC ACClptable levels the.. dev; z2 of noise exposus:e from all trannyortat`.ion , station. ,. ,-y and other nulaanc:e sourr,.e.3 1n► ehP community to $naux c:he- public health , oafety , and welfare . " -1Objective : To minimize externa'. not ees and p,reveni. tho;m f , ogin perietra.ti tig existing quieter areap . " ,ro1. r.,y : The use of quieter auto mobiles , mach ne y and equipment ghou').d be encouraged . 11 Ica! -2.,_.1A..,_ S�l,�� �m�.�3s?3_�t� .d���' � p� "The optimum noise level for all residential voges in LDV hC for outdoors (appro. ' :,.tety equivalent to CNF 60.) and ldn_ 45 for irdoor. . The Froject will be conditioned , through the CUP , to excee'4 the Tea1.1xxemeantg of the City noiee code . Therefore , the kroject: is consistent with these policies . + 1 _5Y ,1aSQ ;_ "Conaider roetrlcting new res de.Dtial dc%relopmen,F within 21 feet of an electric: + motor.-driven pump . ,, Although thin section iv not directly applicable to the Projtct , i. t implies that a 25-foot buffer should wrist � between pump;; and residential. a reae . The pumps on the Frojew�t s ite wi l Y be '_n excess of 100 feet f rom the tlearwst re6idential unit . Therefore , the FcOect is consistent with this policy . Cd7 Reaealim WPM i "Figure 2--13 ohows the existing and proposed parks 'at ultimate development . " The P'rojec.t will not adversely affect or preclude the development of any recreation facil:t",:y ehC►wn 3n Figure 2-13 , Therefore , it is consistent with Figure 2-13 . (e ) Q.X CU1 ti= 5954 I Y j.r .t Y ►4...�a�1� ,_1`� "Goal ; To Z:x ,)vide a multi --mode transportation syNtem that: ensure$ ciior anfe and efficient: movement: of people and gc odti ' The Project will not cauaeh nr result in si.gnifici ttaftic increases . It will v- 1.;a require three truck . tps per day , whi.:h is too low is volume to create a eiinifica►nt adverse ImWact to safety . Therefore , th, Project iv consistent; with thi.R policy . 1,2,Z,�.L 'Yol i cy : Provide adequst L truck and rail service to industrial and c,o=erical areas while providing minimum disturbance to residential areas . " Project': tr..ck routes have been planned to minimize disruption to surrounding residential areas . Therefore , the Project is consistent with this polky. i No policies in the Scenic Highways ;A.ement al?ply to the Utio11 3 ,1.j.4.,_ ; "Action : Monitor changee in industrial and commercial land uwea to asseae their impact on residential land uve . " �• The ETlt discussion of growth-inducing impacts da -c ibee the effect that the Pro,j ec-, will have on rev i c ent i al development , as well as the .. ipact on further residential develop. ent if the Project is not approved . Therefore , the City ' s review of the Project complies with this policy . "Action : Review all changes in planned land uses to deteL,mine the cumulative impacts on community facilities . " The EIR discussion of cumulative +•mpacts describes the Pyroject ' s cumulative impacts on community facilitieo . Therefor , the City' s re view of the Project complies with this policy . Sgctioll J.3 L 2 . 8 "Action : Continue to actively enforce land use ordinances . " The Project will be subject to all City land use ordinances and regulations , enforced through conditions � attached to the CUP . Therefore , the Project is consistent with this policy . 16 . y r Chi 3.rfs,��tf..U.t� . .tm •�:t. L. 1. lr._. .�.. ► ;:� . . ._ '`To provide for the proper development . maintenance , impravewent. , preservation , and use of thw City ' s 3nat`'rail repources by removing and rept or ing v11 produc I-) areas as wells become 3iQi1 -produC `:.a.ti�� . '► The approval of the Project will permit the abandenment and removal of [2 wells . Th-,-,efore , the Project: is consistent with thie pokey , I S. CtJQ : .�. �. ,� �.d..�. A."C, 1) vide and 'wain ai.zi .q quality living environment bo that members of all economic: , social , and ethnic troupe may recidr in Huntington Beach by px•�,vidin$ an tdequate level of community services , facilit tee ; improvementF; , anti mz. i.n ,enxl.ee in all areas c.f the City . '' As conditioned and mitigated , the Project wi'l? increase the quality of arena surrounding wells ;;o be abandoned , becauve the appearance of the Drell sites will. be improved and they could be devel.opzd for residential uses . Therefore , the Project is consistent With this policy . W 5..eC t I g n 3 , k.,_2..-g ,. "To seer, out and encourage industrial development that will broaden the City ' s economic base , j that^ i - div r. aified , that ie well related :to ntbCT land rIees , and that ,provides local. jab onportuniiied by : " Sre&l~,i. a�._ _._' ►�. .:. "Locating industrial uses adjacent to compatible land uses . " � The P: oj .,r ': will remove oil producing facilities from b sites , thereby eliwinmting potentially iuconpatible land uses, from residential artae . Although oil producing facilities will remain on the Project site , the Project site will be improved over its preeent condition to reduce or eliminate potential, land use confl ctm with the suTrounding neighborhood . Overall , the Project will reduce the potential for land time incompatibilities from oil developments in residential areas • Therefore , it is c;onslit,en,t with this policy . SALl"U—I.A.Z3 . 4 '"Establishing effective environmental stcandardo that minimize the externrl effects ou otfier land umes and ;-?he environment . " The conditions and mitigation measures imposed on the Project will minimize its external effects on other land 17 . 5954 �q uses . Therefore , i:he Project is cunsia '.ent with t.hiti policy , ` . � x�� .. _�f... �_i a �• "El im.inat: i;ig C--onf 1 icts between i existing industrial gees and nun ompatible useo , " f The: Project will remove oil producing facilities from 4 o tteo , thereby eliminating potent i,il Incompatible land .� uses from residential areas . A1ti.r-)ugh oil, producing '+ faciliti.ea wi 11 remdin on the Project site , the Project niite will. he improved over its present c:Wriditi.oii to reduce or eliminate potential land use conflicts witli the surrounding. neighborhood , Overall , the Project will reduce the potential for land use conflicts frr,-i oil developments in residential areas . Therefoo e , the Project is cons !stent w1tll this Policy , i LLMU L_..a - 51b... ai "Coordinate the installation of community facilities with street improvements where w The Project will, provide concrete curbs and gutters in conjunction with the conatruction of half struts . Therefore , the Project is consiot.en.t with this policy , 0 ? SSI.�ilem Alt`.hou*h this element addresses coastal. policies , the follovzng policies relating to energy resources could be ,applied to developments throaghout the City . cL an._ 3 . 6 . z . 6iLL "Encourage the production cf energy resources as efficiently as posvi.bl.e with r+inimal adverse impacts . " The Project will uee secondary recovery techniques to increase the efficiency of oil production . As conditioned and mitigated , the Project ' s adverse effect,# will be minimal . Therefore , the Project is consistent with this policy . Encourage unitization and consolidation of existing pit operations . . . to the maximum extent fea" ible and legally permissible when such activities ( 1 ) reduce the area used for oil faciiities , (2 ) are not more environmentally disruptive than existing arrangements and (3) do not jeopardize public bealth , safety or welfare . " � 1y, r The Project will remove oil producing ^,ici:l.�tiee from 6 Cite$ scattered over a 160--acre area and c:ot,soY i dreg: them on a 3 . 1 acre site . This will reduce the area used for j. ci !. facilities . The abandonment of existing wells will, eliminate potentially incompatible land uses fzom yreeideintial areas . R3.though oil producing facilities wi :.l rawai.n on the Project site , the .Project site will be improved over its present condition to reduce or eliminate potential land lase conf l,ict# with the surrounding neighbort.00d . As crnditioned and mitigated , the Project will not jecpardize the public health , rafety, and welfat. e , Therefore , 'F ho Project is consistent with this policy , "Utilize the ell suffixes to ensure that coastal dependent energy kixtraction is accommodated in areas designed other than resource production , except for environmentally eeneltive habitat areas . i The change of zone for the Project wall, utilize an oil suffix to ensure that dnerty extractior is accomodated in an ax ea no,c specifically dcsignat•ed "resource prCdus;tion . " The Project is not located in an environmentally renvi give habitat area , Therefore , the i Project is consistent with this policy . (Consider] ' enhanced ' oil recovery activity And — eneeure the evaluation of impacts different from those aaeoci.a-ed with conventional extraction. " This ZIP discussed potential impacts of secondary water techniques which are diffe!rtnt from those associated with conventiona►t extraction ( eee , e ,.g . , discussions of subsidence and injection water ) , Therefore , the Project in consistent with this policy . �_. .,.. .t ., :4, L "Promote comyat;bili.t.y of oil and other energy-related activities with surrounding useh to the maximum ex+.ent feasible . " a . iticlude measures such as additional requirements regarding fencing , planting and landscaping to erasure aasthetic and envirorwental compatibility between oil activities and other uses , " The Project will comply with Chapter 15 . 22 of the City Oil Code (Screening and LandecaRing) . Therefore , the' Project is consistent with this policy . 19 . 5954 (k> T rQa.,L.aL..And-2entu a 1-1? n cif_ uLt_A. aWX'_'.L "-01." zoning is shown on the matrix tci be compatible with Medium � Density Residential . The Project Site will have 11-01,11 zoning, . The surroundinf neighborhood is c!esignated Me divm Density Residential . Therw-fore , the Y o ject. is conaistent with the land Use El.emeat , as s how i by the Matrix. lis2n�._ A �_ "A f i nt�. i ng of cons i.etency may only be made after analysis of the proposed zc%ning in terms of all nine elements of the General plan . A minding of consistency with only one of t:he element3 , such as the Lund Use Element , is not tufficient for a! finding of consistency with th,� Geiera.l Plan. After considering all nine elements , a finding of consistency with the General plan may bc, made for the zoning proposal in quest ion if it can be shown to fui,they: or pasvegg a measure or significant degree of ciimpat i b i lity with the General Plan policies a . J progr&ma . i O .hire analysis► haw examined all elements of the General Plan can a policy-by-policy basie . The Project will further a numbar of General Plan pol. iciee and programs, , and in consistent with the remainder . Therefore , it is ccr .ieistent +pith the Gener;c.. flan ,With respect to the Land Use Element , the 2olicies have been translated into a ?coning and Land Use Element Consistency Matrix which it; included as Figure M . The Matrix shows that as a miec- 11ane!ous district •01 may be combined , ( i . e . , is cons is ,: ��nt ) with any land use category . It is specifically cunniste,nt with low , medium and medium-high density residential. categories , 2 . 5 . 3 PotCutia1_JfLv" The project will be 1,%cated in a predominately residential area , which could have adverse land use impacts on surrounding residences . The City hereby Wakes finding ( 1 ) with respect to all land use ;impacts except those specifically identified in Section I . SAC irA S1LpRort of Findings ; (a) The Project will result in the abandonment of 22 scattered welle over a 160-ache area . It will also remove 7 associated tank batteries . Therefore , the PrO sect will reduce the number of residences which remain adjacent to 2o . � , 1 w•, u oi. 1•-producing used . Cu rently flume xesidencee are within 20 feet of existing wells t1:a:t will be abandoned under the proposed Project . yor example , on the Villa St . Croix site , 5 o�ex-ating wells are located within 20 feet or less of crondcmini�jm units . .1n total , the Oforeo , PrOfact "Jill reduce land use impa.cti from coil-•producing user . (b) The Facts in Support of rind in&a 1 . 19 : , 5 > l , 2 . 5 . 2 , 2 . 6 and 2 , 9 bexeby are incorporated by reference . Wit:): the exception of aesthetic impacts , discusaed in Sect 9.ox� 1 , 1 , ation measures and elements of the Project which w_-� 1 redui;e impacts on the envi r oament wi l l also eneuxe Project compatibility with surrounding uses . ( ci ) ue{.- Permit 86--2. 5 ia.cludes conditions intended to ensure that the Project is consistent: with the surrounding resi?entietl area . j 2 . $ L1UT_AWr&_GL ►BE 2 . 6 . .i 's2�.eu ial ,lrtf_e_e .t, : The &A,11i.ng phase of the Proje^t will be in operation 24 hours a day . Ligbting for safety will be required at right , Some lighting will be visible, to adJacent residents and pacvsers--by . Tlie. City hereby makes finding ( 1) . Arts ..iA,__, ypport -_AL resin".. The following measures will mitigAte the identified impact to a bevel of i.nrignificanze . ( a) Light And glare shall be directed or screened to prevent an direct glare from Project lighting outside it parameter Undaries , (b) No flood : ighte shall be used . Lights will be low profile ( i . e . , will Light low valve and equipment areas only) . ( c ) wring drilling , the derrick will be enclosed and all lights , except the aircraft warning light , will be on the inside of the acoustical blanket . Lights around the aiuxi lliaiy equipment will be near ground level and well below the top of the 30 , acoustical wall . 2 . 7 t`I MATT ON i 2 . 7 . 1 Patentlill Ef fa9t : During the drilling phase of the Project , 3 heavy vehicle (truck) trips a day will be � f generated by the Project . 5954 J "ago 1 f yt i"tie City hereby males finding ( 1 ) , i The follovitg seas+gyres will mi ; ig,ate the identified imp6ct to a level of insignificance , (a ) During the drilling phase , all heavy true traffic shal-I be limited to the following streets between the 405 Freeway and the Project site : Beach Boulevard , Adams Avenue , Delaware Street. . Entrances to the site shall occur only V*I srx—�rxrf1old Avenue and Califortyis Street . These truck routes and Acceuees were revrievice by City staff and were choaen to reduce impacts on ; adjacent local net i ghborhood . (b ) Tru;:k traffic shall be limited to the hours of 7 : 00 a .m . and 5 : 00 p .m . ( c ) Truck deliveri.ee shall be staggered so that no trucks shall wank on the street for longer than five minutes . Wo trucks shall be permitted to park an the wt teeth . (d ) Local streets aff6 Cted by truck traffic shall be inspected before and after construction . Any damage to loci1 streets by heavy _rucks shall. be repaired and - - _ reronst xuoted.._ per _ f,Y—regnt rements--at--the --expense of th-e -- Pioject: applicant , (e) It will not be necessary to restrict parking can � the side streets to accommodate trucks . Trucks with a turning radium of 55 feet can easily turn from Springr- ield Avenue onto California Street . Curbs will be painted red tc prohibit parking for 10 feet: on either side of the driveways . M An overload permit shall be obtained from the City and State ( if ;required ) for all oversized loads to be moved on public; streets . 2 . 7 . 2 Rot ant i.al .�iUIs',11 : During the drilling and construction phases , traffic will increase nominally in the PrQject vicinity . T''ie City hereby makes finding (1 ) . !Watt a .. n -$UlVpar t Df r : The f ollowing measures will mitigate the identifie impacts to a level of insignificance . . (a) All employees shall park on -site , 22 . r r t y (b) Because the Project will pave and add curbs to currently unf ini Qhed streets , approac,i.mrtely 1 , 700 feet of additional curbs id,. ua, st—,�P.et parkin , will. be made Available to area residents by the Prof ect • (r) During the const,uction phase , all tuck traffic Oall be limited to streets reviewed by the City staff and cho6en to reduces impacts on the acdjacent local neighborhood . Entrances to thl Trite snail occur only on Springfield Avenue, and California Street i�nd Llel,-+ware Street. (d ) Truck trs..fi' ic shall' b(, limited to the tours of 7 : 00 a . m. and 5 : 00 p .m . (e) Truck deliveries ehall be staggered eu that no trucks shall wait un the strerc !or longer than five minutes , No trucks shall he permitted to park on the atxeeta . (f) Local streiete af.fpcte:d by ti,ick Lraffic shall be Inspected before and after conatrurtion . Any damage to Local stree*e by 'heavy trucks shall be repaired and reconstructed per, 10ity :requi,:ementw at the expenop. of the Project applicant . (g) Additional projectWrel.at;ed traffic will t,e of - - - -- short duration and will .involve lens traffic than .6L, noxcial . t construction project . (h) During the production/ injection yhaep , there Trill be no increase in traffic in the Project neighborhood resulting from tht Project . 1 . 7 . 3 The water pipeline fiom the Chevron site will. dierupt traffic over a short period along the following route : from Colder West Street east &ion Clay Avenue to Huntington Street , then south along Hunt ngtor Street from Clay Avenue to the facs: li.ty site at Springfield Avenue and Huntington Street . ti ► The City hereby makes f indirin (1) , ,Uct"n Su•ppur,�ofind Aa: The gollowing weaeuree .-will mitt gate the identified impact to a level of insignificance . 23 . 5954 rt. i <a) No more th�..n one .laze of !:::affix shall be closed during the day and :no •41,anea shall be closed at night . i (b) Busy intersections shall be either bored or platted over so that trhffi. c. interruptions will be kept to a minimum . (c, ) Several hundred feet of pipeline will be installed , surveyed , inspected and the trench }puck--filled in one day . Therefore , no one area will be affected throughout the pex: iud of c oria-t uc:t: i on , 2 . 8 . 1 eQtcaliAl_.. Temporary duet iTpacts will result frow Project consttuction activities , including the Construction of the water pipeline . finci,iBU : The City hereby makes finding ( 1 ) . _ in.- ._..,Q._twi The following measures will cal Ligate the Identified impact to a level of insignificance . (a) A oast control program shall be submitted to the L�partment of Development Services for review and approval prior to the iesuanze of building permits . (b) tensed dirt areas rMal1 be mi.nimlIzed in the Project design Ron and parking areas shall be paved and other open areas shall be landscaped or covered (with gravel or asphalt ) to minimize duet generation . 2 . 0 . 2 kotenti l,....Ufect : Pollutants will. be emittted by construction equipment and by vehicle trips . ,'indingl : The City hereby makes finding ( 1 ) . FActa ill unr;ast of . F'indinag: (a) During the construction phase, only 17 two-way trips will be generated by the Project . Thirty--.two two-iny tripQ will be ener&ted durinf the drilling phase , and 7 0uring the in ection/product. on phase . The emissions from this number of tripe is not eignificant . 2 . 8 . 3 Zotet.7Al I=9.A : Oil x)roduction feeilities , particularly tanks , can be the Source of fumitive hydrocarbon emissions . 24 . ��M. IYell�lil®L.7�t{IiA4eP'i�.�4 .. .'1 . ,r . ,r• h ryt 1 i ,1 1 . : The City hereby maleR 11" ;ir19 (a) As required by the Souttr. Coast Air Quality Management District , Project oil handlin w and storage tanks will use a vapor recovery ry si,�e Y em W1 ch will reduce p 95-987.. of hydrocarbon emissiona . The ..1ro #„ ti� 1 r :� � ,��.N .16 exi, t1 ?19. t:ankA which 4 are uncontrolled for air Pollutant emi!esionB , irc111dirsg hydrocarbons . The replacement: of the 16 tanks will reduce total estimated emissions by 24 , :357 pcninde per year , The 7 new Project tanks with vapor recovery , assuMing 95% efficiency , will generate 3 , 159 pounds of emissions per year . The total emission reduction will be, 21 , 198 pounds per year , 58 . 1 pounds ter day , or an 87% reduction in hydrocarbon emissions . This is the subbt•art461 ,11 r.et- benefi " of the project . (c) Further hydrocarbon en,..ission red.uctiuns 8.180 will be achieved through the el mination of other antiquated process equipment , including open sumps , r 41-•water separators and other similar equipment which is current- ly uncopatrolled for air pollutants . �. --(d)_.,._The . immediate neighborhood surrounding the , Project gi to will be er?osed to 3 , 1.59 poumde per .year of emissions , or approximately 9 pounds per day . The a neighborhood currently is exposed to twice this amount becauee of existing tank, batter : es located nearby . 2 . 8 . 4 . . O i 1. and gas produCotion activities can emit benzene , a knova c4rreinogenic air, contaminant , sin in" : Thy! City hereby mattes finding ( 1 ) , (a) An evaluation of the benzene emissions which may be associated with the Project was conducted using the South 0oAst Aix "Ality Manta emeat District proposed Rules 223 (Air, Quality Impact Analyses ) and 1401 (New Source Review of known and Suspected Carcinogenic Air Contaminants ) . The Project ' a potential benzene emissions , using a conservrtive figure , will be . 00057 cubic meters ear second , which is 8 to 10 times below the rgxease imits that require further air quality analysis . 25 . f 5954 E Z'he c;Ject ?i �. 1 ��� x;n riat:e exi stillp rb) Pr t ek nk�; _ are i.tineviAt011ed ¢or air p� �lut.�nt: emi nsions , 11 inc: %,ujing bcc�2er'ae . 'i'h x fore , project proi�a.l)':y w: ] 1 resw) t xr, ,e t, t: i eYava M !�y�nr��►n4 �t i i ek tierzene exni9si0fAG in the Project A ea • (c ) South Coast. Air Quality Management District, � aVp:oved v,rkpor recovery eyeteme st.e�y.1 >>e used for tanks in oll {E3) 1,4+�-l�a'�:i , sI•i�,��: R :�c ".lea �y becausedu . c such expc��u eat oub j eGt to SCAQMD prcgol ed u are not thought to Mxetit.ute r)"lt" ink . In the event of are can--site spill , the system is desigl� I to pump the spilled fluid hack tl�i'ougb the separation „yetem and into the tank . Spi .1 ,1s wov1d he (.,()n.cained can si. L_y . 2 . '� . 1 e. '. �_.�E:� Oil well drilling andumi�in�y operations , production wa►stea and earth moving equipment ,i and repair %,aaintenance �:p ipmerit will generate noise which could affect residences in the arpa of. the Project , � r.i:1di"&: The City hereby makes finding, G ) . C11pS ... .-.-- The i 011 aw i ng measures will mitigate the ident:i,fied impact to a level of � insignificance . ( s,) The Project shallfully( r�i n �c� No . h the �379 ) . Huntington Beach Morse Ordinance (b) A report prep& ed by an accuetical, engineer certified by the C,,?unty of Orange shall be submit-Led to t))e Director of Development Services for review arid e;pprOval prior to commenciclg drilling . The report ahaa 1 describe noise levels r.t the Project Site property line and at t`�e nearest residential property lines o bath witb and without acoustical treatment o to noieehe rng a tren+gttrand service rigs . The report shall i.ncxt tion measures necessary to assure compliance with the Huntington. Beach solve Ordinance -'OrdinanceNo . 2379 ) . This oh4ill ;include the provisions of t, a ordinance regarding a ma:imual hc1uri.y average noive el of 50 WA) during the hours from 10 : 00 p .m . to . . 00 am (c ) Hxtexxivey vibration , as determined by the DirectOt of Development Services , shall be reduced to acceptable levels . OPEC r (d) Noise tuanitroring sh-611 be.. conducted ulinader the supervi sloe of an ac dust i, cal anb i.neer cert, if i ed by the Co%jnty of Orange Repor'tro witil be w ib&11,tcd to tte Director of Developmaint Servicem within three working days after. they vom.� ,Ion of each phrY�e of the monitoring effort . The mon itri.r ing ohall inc hide the rop1loving : 11r1Awr to the stsrt of the di. 11i!ng p9;:w � � zoo:sa �I0A0Ur@MP?) re shall. he obtained dur the operation of the specific dt i►lling rig w111cli has been selected and the measuretaents slxal ). i�i-lated to those whicli wall he expetilenced st the nearopst tesidentiial bounds r ies to the d r, i l l ing mite . In addition , the noise control neavur.eR whis:h knave beers , or will be , applied to the �Jg, as weeded for compliarice vith 0je truism ordinance shall be idonti.�ied . C � ) SlArt,_._� _.. ril_ li&. Not' we, measurements whall be cbtalined daring the nighttimp. hoots ( 10 : 00 p .m . to 7 : 00 -a . m , ) for at least r:.x hours .,a each of three mights within the five day jeriod from the start of the dri l,l in,t phase . Mr)nitaring shall. occur at the nearest residential botandary to the scti�t l drilling operation . The noise level data shall be comp red to noise levels mpecifind in the Noise Ordimance . Where an exceedance of the Ordinance is identified , noise control meawures shall be applied and -an aclditionai two nighte of monitoring riball be required . C37 R=Jae ... �. ,i.11, .*�g_� e . rdciss monitoring shall occur during a six-hour period between the hours Rrom 10 : 00 p ,m . to r : 00 a .m. at least once each mointh during the Drilling Phase of the Project . The noise level data obtained shall he conpared to the Noise Ordinance starderds . Where an exceedarce. of the st.andardz is identified , noitwe control measures shall be a ylied and an additional two nights of monitoring shall. be required . (e) , Truck traffic shalk be limited to the houra betweer. 7 . 00 a .m. and 5 : 00 p ,m . No t ruck•e shall park on the street , and tr+uct deliveries shall be dtaggoed to that no truck will Wait lea the street for longer than five minters . There shall be no entrance or exit of vehicles 27 , M S54 1 11 from the Dz i ll. Site between the hours of 10 -00 p . m , anI 7 : 00 a .m. . except fov emergency purposes . (f) A double acoustical blanket enclosure shall be ;:ovide►d at man-door entrances . (g) duo speakers , loud belle or buzzers shall be employed on site . (h) Sudden high fre uetAcy noise shall br Aept to a aininum by using rubber lined pipe elevator- �,f necessary and rubber tires to absorb the impact of abvlar• being rolled onto they walk in pr"paration for onning, casing . Acoustical blankets shall be used to red ;ce this type or remaining noise to $nsignificAs::; levels . (i ) All dxi-tiling r. itt; and production wells shall be operated by electrical motors and electric, pumps only . No emergency geacritor shall be used . (� ) Double iouffl.ers aball be used on produrtinn heieta and earth moving equipment , tu.rther reducing the impact to the neigbboxhood . (t ) well Pervice rife shall be operate ' no more than 46 nays Fer year. between 7 : 00 a .m . and 7 : 00 p .m . or daylight houra , whichev+er is shorter . No more than 4 well service rigs way be on the premises at any one time . The service rigs Oail not exce::d 120 feet in height and shall be double-yea+alf led acid utilize acoustical blankets . (l ; The 24--hour drilling phase shal1 not operate for longer than tiro years . 2 . 9 . 2 Poteri j - fect : ,A iackhoe will be used ducint the construction of the water pipeline . Wi s : The City hereby makes finding (1) . Mtn (a) ruble arufflers wIYl be used on backhoes during the construction of the grater pipeline . and vorirmen will be cautioned to votY, ao quietly as possible . (b)' MAY residus.l noise impact vill not be significant b�!civae it will be tom oraary in nature and will only occur duri0g the day, Retider;ts of each block Will only be affected for tappxoximately tpnt dry . 28 i MA, . Cp W r 2 - 10 2 . 10 . 1 al Iffe9t : The potential exists for oil, $pills from the pines , valves , tanks and e uipment , and from the smell Anounts of crude oil whicb wil; be contained on the I`acility Site in vtorage tanks . Zilldi ,s ; The City hereby makes finding (1 ) ractar _.i rum ■ : The rollowing measures will mitigate the tdentif ief impact to a level of insitnificance . (a) If an oil spill occurred during a rainstorm , surface drarinage, stater could become contaminatel with crude oil The Mill Site and facility Site Mve been designed to provide containment of surface fl.u .bs such ao storawater , and in emergency conditions , crude oil , The Sites ehall be enclosed with masonry warlle which provide compldte control of surface Mids . All true, gears and maiint gates *hall have raised thrteho.lde with either s1oped rampo or r'aieed stt�ops which preclude surface fluids from leaving the Site . All surface fluids rhall be diverted to catch basing. • (b) The pacts in Support of finding 2 . 2 . 1 , describing the diversion of surface fluids to catch basins , he:phy are incorporated by reference . (c ) If the tanks ruptuz end and spilled oil , the containment area for spill will contain a � 69 ,000 cubic feet , almost two t ives the mini gum volume required by the State Division of oil & Gaa . The containment area is below grade , approx imetely� 4 feet lower than the water processing area and 6 feet lower tha-a the adjacent street level. . The contai;Memt area will contain any oil spilled groom tanks . (d) The Project will uoe all new pipelines , valves , fittings , tanks and equipa0rrte . All pipelines will meet the t6guiTtRents Of t,,.e State of californis Pipeline Safety Act . All iteaes will ba Protected a ainst corrosion by one or more of the following : poly v,nyyI Claride coating ofA exterior buried pipelines , cathodic protection system , . ,paint coating on All abOve-ground Pipelines and egvipweat , 410zy coating on interior of starter ptocessing tanks , and use of stainless steel fittings , (e) An Operxti"g procedures Nanu&l 4h622 be J?tapL.red for th! training (.f all new employees . EaCb operator sba►ll be required to thoroughly unde4stand and be able to 29 , 5954 .ram 1 • operate each pied of equipment in the system. Th* Operating procedureu manual shall explain in detail how to operate eatri piece of equipment and include emorgency procedures . shut-doWn Of equipment and notification of authorities . l 2 , 10 , 2 pa en iAl Zfftgt : Various chemicals , both non- hazardous And hazardous , are utilized In oil and Saco drilling production . Chemicals may be used to enhance the drilling mud properties during drill of oil and gas Wells . for dehydration of the crude ail to marketable -aality. to inhibit corrosion, scale and baterial levels , and in treatment of the produced Water to suitable reinjection quality. )Etgd.i=: The City hereby makes finding (1 ) . $`act in S ipc+U__Q Findrnai. : The folXowing measurers will mitigate the identified impact to a level of insi& if ic&nce . (r ) Bone of the chemicals used for the Project will be use... in large quarnt i.ti.os , or mould ever be used off of the l k'woject sites , j s (b) All federal and state regulationia , including i worker and commuaii.ty discl.osurll pro nears , site Business Emergency Plans , p- opos it ion 65 warnings , hazard labelling and Spill. Preventioti Central. & rountermeasure Plans , shall be fully enforced . (c ) f'a►ct (c) in Support of Finding 1 . 2 . 1 , desciAbi.ng emergency action and sp 11, prevention plans , bereby is incorporated by reference . (d ) If a localized ppi,ll of hazardous wa►terials should occur , it woulJ te contained in the *tea and ao impact wound occur Outside the Site boundaries . Proceduves to mitigate Impacts to ran-site Yworkery shall he included in the OppZa►tions Manual . (e) The Fac.to in Support of Finding ? . 10 . 1 , derscribingg the containment of materials on the Drill Site and racility Site, hereby are incorprorated by reference . (f) The State Department of Health Services has 30 . „v, l 4, 1 y h .M1 i u * psoved a list of non-haisardous additives tO rotory aud . Tbere is nothing in the Itunti[s ton Beach Oil isli drillinghistory that woul•1 indicate that dous •aterials will be required . Thereforet to the greatest i extent feasible , the operator of the Project shall use non -hasardous additives in the Project' • drilling mud . 2 . 10 . 3 te" j * e - : Crude oil will be transported existing Chevron pipeline from the gacillt Site to h an n g re`um nation . T Iere is a possibirity C1 �t�avro P k pipeline rupture . Zidian&&: The City hereby rakee finding (1) . fact•. _Jn Su2Rort of rind ae �I ` (tl The addition Of the Project 's oil stream w►tll reduce pressure from the Chevron the Project wille oil enter pipeline . eelipelirie Because the oil o� at a higher temperature than the oil currently n the 11peline , it will reduce the viscosity of the oil . This n turn will reduce p:r.assure, in the pipeline v thereby decreasing the podaihility of pipeline rupture when compared to existing conditions . (b) Even if the pipeline ru turedr the on�.yy oil that could be released would be the o�l in the pipeeline between would deep the block valves . AutomaticAutomaticshutdowns incr*mental volume of oil attr ilaut+able to the project at an ir►sigp4fical-It x,evel in the event of pireline rupture . (c ) Chevron completed hydrot+esting its pipeline in March 1988 to a preasure of 750 pounds per squire inch► + The test wav 'witnesses and approved for the State fire marshal by the Xarin Corporation on Marcia 8 , 1988 . 2 . 10 . d Potga ILI�.Jff gr l: The rupturt Of the Water pipeline , or accidents resulting from ppedestrian acceve to trenches during the conatruct.ion of tine utter pipeline , Could have public safety impacts Jrjndin� j� : The City hereby makes finding ( I ) . (a) The nMIS in Support of Findiag 2 . 7 Y 3 , desc:ibint measures' mitigating any impacts on water quality, hereby are incorporated by t+eferencie . (b) The water pw •enill iora eso that monitored in evddmn &utt tic shutdown pressurey' 31 . 5954 �T . f WOO& 1 ressure drop will trigger an alarm and shutdown the rausfor ?tape - This will ensure that any release of Water Is Minimal . (t) No t-enches will be left open at night , and loveral hundred feet of pipell ne will be Installed , turveyed , inspected and trench back-filled In one day. During the &v, barriers will ensure that pedestrians do not approach trencher . This is stand&Td operating procedure in the construction of underground pipelines . Z . 10 . 5 Potent ' 1 Effrct : Oil-related I;as leaks could lead to lire or explosion. Unt i a : The City hereby makes finding ( 1 ) . facts._.i&_su1 o t cf Zindinve : (a) A report made by CreoScit:nce Analytical, , Inc , (Roberti Report ) determined that a ,Ws Angeles fine and explosion was caused by gas that was biogen1c , or tLe result of bacterial decay, not related to a leaking pipeline or poorly abandoned oil well . It was also determined that only one of the 91 gas samples analyzed in DLnti.ngton Beach was petrooenic , or associated with oil. . Eighteen 6"ples subsequently taken in .Huntington Beach were determined to be of biogenic origin . These studies 1 indicated that the problem of methane gas hazard does not have its roots in oil field-related activity. (b) Water flooding n an oil renerv+r.ir reduces the amount of free gas and lesaens the possibility of gas leaks . Any free gas flows to areas of low pressu,:e . Producer wells are ar(sae of lour pressure, and as will flow there throughout the process of repressuri•ation. Injection wells will, be located away from poorly abandoned wells and in close pro7,imity to producing wells , ensuring that free gas will flow to the producing wells . (c ) A contingency plan shall be submitted to the Huntington Beach fire Department for review and approval , with steps to be taken in the event that leakage from any abandoned wells which do not most present day abandonment requ i remenu finds its way to the surface . (d) . The possibility of fire and/or **plosion at the drill ri • does not co�nrtitute a significant im act because t�e dtilling equipment will be a ui ed Wit; Guar III blcwout prevention gv i lament . Add i t ipomlly; the rues lMi re of the Project are well %nown, having been produced for over 60 yeare . The reservoir pi.7ssure it 32 . ,t f below hydrostatic and -will be **oily :Ontrolled by the drilling mud . Tberefort3 o all anticipated subsurface ressure Will be contained by the vei ht of the mud . 1f a ire chid occur , the open cellars will allow the Fire Department to control it film that surface , without having to outer the cellars 2 . 11 EMLYC SELVYCAS Am V=Ll ES 1 . 11 . 1 Fatantial If f ect ; The Project could i�acrease the demand on p0lice Protection servicesr , including potential.increases n vandalism and noire nuisance c=plaints . Findiou : The City hereby wakes finding Facts in C Mmit- bf Fin dinu ; The following measures will mitigate the identified impact to a level of ins ignificance . (a) The proposed site: will be enclosed with � decorative masonry wall SnJ with a landscapirg berm . The goll and landscaping will avoid providing easy access to ` the site . .. (b) The Facts in Support of Finding 2 . 9 . 1 , relating to noise impacts , hereby are incorporated by reference . � 2 . 11 . .i ►.. Elf cl : The potenti sI for faze , odor or spill incidents could increase the demand on fire prevention/protection servicea in the City. The City hereby makes finding (1) . (a ; The Fire Depai:tmert has stated that it Will actually have a reduced workload due to the consolidation of many oil producing sites onto one fully equiped and protected efte . `b) An on-site tii*e suppression system shall be installed as u primary uource for fire protection. (c) . Oft wells shall be provided with gas detection sXstSMN from cellars to 24-hourm monitoring locatioae . (d) fire eatingui.sher• approved by the Fire Department must be installed witLin 75 feet of gravel . (e) Metal open-grate Covers $hall be provided over the top of Well cellars . +mwr�l 33 . 5954 t , i Storage tanks shall have pro--plumbed foam i-ijection systems and exterior deluge water spray systems . (g) The foam storage area and foam quantity small be approved by the fire Department , and fire hydrants shall be located in areas approved by the Fire Department . Xydrogen sulfide detection systems approved by the Fire Department ehall be installed on the Project perimeter , and fire extinguishers approved by the Fire Department shall be installed thoroughout the Site . ,All gate openings crust be 24 feet in width and installed in compliance with Fire Department Specification 403 . (h) A full vapor recovery system shall be installed , as required by SC.AQMti . < i ) Only three on-site crude oil tanker are permitted , which shall nearer be completely full at once . (j ) Fact (c.) in support of Finding 1 . 2 . 1 , describing emergency action And spill prevention plans , hereby is Incorporated by reference . i (k) Prior to termination of the oil operation, a plan shall be submitted for the review and apprcval of the Fire Department and Development Services Department , sbowing lo% the Site will be abandoned and restored to its closest natural state . 2 . 1I . 3 Ea. 'U1 Xf f c c t Paving of the Project site Will increase etormwater , which could present additional demands on the sewer system . ,lindi : The City hereby makes finding ( 1 ) . fArts__i2oo _ R0i ¢ (a) The Facts in Support of Finding 2 . 2 . 1 hereby are incorporated by reference. (b % The Project will take about 30 , 000 barrels pet day pf produced water from Chevron, which is currently dumping 4pproximately 40, 000 barrels per day Into the sanitary sewer . Wherefore, instead of adding more brine to the Brewer system, this Project will relieve the system of about 30 , 000 barrels per day . 34 . a Nor '.. / A Olin 6 � f' • 2 . 11 . 4 �►bti� *�rar t • ��• During the initial drilling operation, a fresh water demand Of HMO tallons per day is Mpected . rollowing coa■pletion of the drillin hare , th* grater consumption rate will be reduced to 114809 per day. The City hereby makes f ind img .ftctl i u- uppa r t id,.l. ndiriga (a) Trash water cod over tre long tersr is roughly all uiwalex�t to an induNtairial uto one-third of an acre In aide , or about 6 attached presidential Unait$ . Ads uate slater aruppliass szIffit to want this demand , The available fire flow if 5 400 9911.0ne per minute Stith 3 , 000 gallons per ainute being the required fire flow at present , 1 , 11 . E POtOntiAl ff&ct • During the drilling phase , one truck per day normally x be requiredto collect and transport liquid oil Wr ..e and one truck er day will be required to handle sol waste collected rn medal bins . rulloaing the completion of drilling , the volume of wastes F will be reduced, arti,cula,rly for solid wastes such ag drill cuttings , The periodic c�eaning of tanks during the f operational phase will require the removal of sludge from bottoms . i The City hereby makes finding (1) . "1. C a in Sups'= .- Gf,_�dinp.: The following measures will amaitigatte the identified iMPAct to a level of insiginf i cance . (a) Dumping Operations for oil field wastes are, normally handlers 'y contract service firma that specialize in vaete disposal of this type . (b) Sludge from tank bottoms gill be deposited in a special dump equipad to handle this type of waste, and deposited In a Glaso Z landfill . (c ) All waste oate>riala , both liquid and solid , shall be collected and Separated on site , teap4:iraa:ily tored in Nadal bins -and tanks , and trucked to asp,;°opr i ate d i tposal cite$ . (d) ' i.aiquid wastex shall be collected and stored iaa closed trines to prevent the spread of odors prior to disposal . . fe) Gol3scfiion areas for waste shall be located 35 , 5954 M;y y y+11 1 � • yMj .\ • Within peripheral walls and will not be visible to resident i a1 areas ,•` 2 . 11. 6 n ill Effect : The Project will require three busiftess �s and a public phone on each parcel . It is likely that an into re-cownication tine between the two ' parcels will be included in the telephone system , riftdintx ; The City hareby swLkee finding (1) . rAtta in S"sport of FindinRA ; ` (a) The General Telephone Company . p p y provider telephone service to the City and to the Project site , No current inadequacies exist in the system . The number if lines servicing the Project site is less than the number of 1 its which would be required if medium density rasident ial units were developed on site . 2 . 12 A 013SERVATI0 2 . 12 , 1 Potential Effar,,,: Drilling rigs and proauction wells will be operated by electrical motors and electric pumps . :Although a small amount of natural gas will be produced with the oil , additional natural gas may be required fog: production , lti, dti a: The City hereby makes finding ( 1 ) . ate is SulDROJA at rinds; (a) Tropes: sizing of the well pumps will save energy throuSh reducing the amount of electricity used . (b ) Southern California Edison anticipates no problems in providing electrical service of the Project . Southern California Gas Company, which will provide any additional natural gas required , also anticipates no problems in providing service for the Project . (c) The purpose of the Project is to produce apprcximately 9 . o million barrels of crude oil . 2 . 15 OR= INDUCING IMPACTS 2 . 13 . 1 'Poten .,iA Compared to exirtin conditions , the Project will have a growth inducing, Impact of 57 units . At the City-wide overage of 2 . 70 persons per household , the 57 dwelling unit# would house 15S pbrean• . 56 . a L L1' ' MENO A-0 l.+ . • I I The City hereby &akts finding (I) . t■ in sunaort o! lind_into : �(a) The 158 persons who would be b►oused on the• project site represents a population factor of only 0 , 08% of the estimated 1987 City population , (b) The Project will utilise two entire City blocks for the appirozimately 20--30 year life of the project . Named on ezintir General Plan and zoning designations , but for the Pro j ect , both of thi: two Pto j ect hlocks would be u11e4 for residential purposes . 'Under ezirtin seining, 108 residential units could be constructed on the rite• . Based an ezisting General plan designation , 76 units could be built on the site . Therefore , the growth inducing effect of the Project could be less than the number of unito that could be developed on the Project site . 2 . 14 tMMLAT M ACTS 2 . 14 „ 1 gt;gatial Mfert : Wo other oil consolidation pro,j octs are in the process of assembly witbin the vacinity of the Project , The 'cumulative effects of these projects could nave impactor on subo;idence and gas leaks . Pindiaasca ; TLe City hereby makes finding (1) . Fs7xl Jindingi: (a) The Facts in Support of Viading 2 . 1 . 2 , describing the effect of the Project on subsidence , hereby are Incorporated by reference . (b) The Facts in 3vpport of Finding 2 , 10 . 5 , describing the effect of water flooding on &as leaks , hereby are incorporated by reference . (c) In the wilmingtcn Field , water Clooding took place in an area where many wells were dmaged badly and not properly abandoned . Pven with this large number of Improperly abandoned we11s , there were no problems vi.th injected. fluids or oil or gas surfacing via these conduits . (d) The Si nal Rill field vaa unitized and three water floods Initiated in 1974. MarAy of the well, In this field ar4 as old as the Ifuntington leach wells ; Loveuer , the Divivion of Oil & Gas has received notificatlon of only two Deans that barve leaked . 37 . • 4 5954 "^ ';� � a• 17, , 1�• r i •�� v4y 2 . 14. 2 fttantiAl affect : in conjunctior with present , approved and roposed developments in the City , the secondary traffic effect# of the induced growth from the Project could result in negative impact# on the t eirculation system. dius: The City hereby stakes finding (1) T ' rafts in Sunoort of Jd adints : (a) Growtb induced by the Project is corstrolled by General Plan policies relating to land use designations and circulatioyrt improvements . The land use designations used to gameral;.e estimates of secondary traffic impacts from induced g.�owth are consistent with the current General Plan dmeignation . Therefore , the traffic generated by these uses ham been taker, into account in establishing the General Plan circulation plan of arterial streetie and highways . This plan adequately acconm►Aates traffic estimated to be generated by Ceneral Plan designated uses . (b) A recent traffic study conducted fof The Waterfront, which evaluates cumulative traffic levels foi: the Brea of the City most likely to receive heavy traffic flogs from proposed development , confirmed that traffic Will operate at acceptable levels of service . (c) The 108 vehicles which would be associated with the 57 unite that constitute the growth inducing effect of the Project represent a very small increment of the never vesicles that will be within the area . 2 . 14 .3 EQ±j= Zf f ect : In conjunction with present , approved and proposed projects , traffic resulting from growth generated by the Project may add to noise level e adjacent to circulation routes . The City hereby wakes finding (1) . In Surbart at Eindiask: (a) Implementation of the Optimum Noise Levels , and of the lloiie Abatement Plan for Traffic poise contained in #actions 3 .3 .3 and 2. 3 . 4 of the General Plan Noise 126ment., #rill, mitigate these cumulative impacts to a level of i►nsignificauce . aatlal Iffo= In conjunction Mich ,existin 2 . 1�►.k �'.�,t � g approved and proposed future projects , noise within the 38 . c y,y PWAb y "y vicinity of the Drill Site and Facility Site could exceed City noise standards . rindiagn : The City hereby makes finding (1) . FICU o SUROQ= 01 ,Ififtd3ngs : (ar ) Pacts in Support of Finding 2 . 9 . 1 hereby are incorporated by reference . M The m3osurerment of Arise is by definition. a � Cumlati�vel` ereasurement . It take; into account background noise. Xy conditioning the Project to comply with the City's noise Ordinence , the Catty has ensured that cvsrulative noise levels vill not constitute a► significant +advere a Impact . 2 . 14 . 5 Z21&at I a I -& ,,A: As a secondary effect of the PwoJect , automobile emissions associated with they 57 dwelling units which constitute the Projectfs growth inducin impact , in conjunction with present , approved and propose development , could result An adlvorse impacts on air quality. i 1 Ladlytit : The City hereby makers finding (1) � (a) it is estimata d that vebicie emissions constituting a secondmry impact of the Project vould result in a daily increase in vehicle emissions of 3 ,596 . 3 pound# per year . Any air quality irapacts from these emissions is offset nearly 6 times by the improvement its air quality caused by replacmuent of existing old -)il •tora,ge tanks with new tanks fully equi plad with an effective vap�a�, -ecovery system . The Project will result In a not red~action of Z� � 198 pounds of hydrocarbons per w, sae , 2 . 14 . 6 Patent 1 1—Mf,ort: As a sccoudary impact of the Project. the 57 units which constitute the growth inducing +sliest of the Project could generate addiit.i,>nal school chWrea . ,potentially causing adverse effects on the school system. Madinn: The City hereby makes finding (1) . &tots.Sypkar^t Findings (a) ftntfUtton Beach city schools have been Uporrieacing a Steady decline in enrollment over the pact •fit 39 5954 �L'd�►1ir/i+r,V`+1+�.'41+.►wrwwo y, � y _.!� 1• T' 10 years . Capacity in the school district currently exceeds student enrollment , and the schools impacted by the Project are particularly well situated to absorb additional enrollment , Projected i ucreaoed in enrollme; t from the Project do not exceed the excess capacity , eve , taking into account the increase in enrollment expectea from othtr projects %b) xhe total number of students from approved atkd . piolosed projects , including project-related additions, is 371 now students . Enrollment projections for Won High School Dictrict schools above a decrease in enrollment until 1990 . An increase is projected from 1991 through �. 1995 . Zven with new development, however , the expected increase in studadnt• rnm 1992 to 1995 is not enough to compensate to the espeL;.ed decline in enrollment between 'r 1981 and 1992 . (c ) An increase in dwelling units does not f neCessarily reevit in an increase in enrollment . From 1975 to 19879 son additional 9 ,. 223 new dwellings wure constructed ,and occupied within the boundaries of the Runtington Beach Union Ri gh School District . The nit i . impact can enrollment Nag a minraa 3 , 141 students , a V% decrease . i j 40 . i I y 3 . UNDINGEAMGMING AL1746ATMI 3 . 1 .`_11 'i 3 . 1 . 1 Ructi tirin of AlterAlLtime: The glut d"fines the "no ro,�We" alternative at the mraintrenance of smisti�nf coed kions . 3 . 1 . 2 ���17.._ .Et�.�tQ t a oL tha 1 1 &A.Q —alt slt t 1 �`� .e�i-.Eo� The City hereby finds that the "no pr jert" alternative is not environmentally superior to the Project . f'acter in Sum .._at -x1►ad (a) 1i'lis a►lternaZive txAd not reeul' t in the abandonment of 22 scattered wel1v over a M-acre area , Therefore , crjmva::ed to the Project , i; would increase the numLor of reeicenr.es which remain adjacent to oil-producing ase3 . The existing wells world continue to produce oil , gas and water without the addition of the modern vapor recovery systems , secondary recovery to .hniques , or utatp-of-the-art fire fig,hti.rg equipment which will be incorpora"ed into the Project . The coat inming tree of existing technology would have • detrimental imp,acta on air quality compared to the proposed ProjecL . The potential for arreati.ng subsidence , '^~ or causing rebound , through injection would be eliminated . Excess brine produced by Chevron would not be �. used for injection and would continue to be diagosed of in the sewer system, thert-by increasing the load can the serer system In comparison with the proposed Project . fxietin; facilities would not be able to withstand the impacty of major earthquakes . (b) This alternative also would have positive effects . It would eliminate the need for tbres heavy trucks per day to travel through the neighborhood adjacent to the Project Site during the drilling phase of the Project ; would eliminrte the possibility N a lire or a spill of oil or hazardous c.hemicais on the Project Site ; and would eliminate the possibility of damage to Project facilities and wail i s in the event of an a r.r Viquake of a tat nitude of N g or water . This alternative also would *Imitate the use. or perimeter walls , which would be required to witilate aesthetic and noise impacto of the proposed Project . In weighing the pasit3.,i.-e &M negative environmental effects of this alternative. however , the City has determined that the positive effects of this altesrus►tiv4 are lase significant then the negative effectR . 41 . , 59M i 1 1 1 i „t 1 . • It . * d1K r•1, ••y' 11 1 YYYti • ,a 3« 1 . 3 Atf setlynnems in Hooting.. projeer Octins : The 1%* pfoject” alternative would not meet Pro set objectives because it WMILd r►ot petait the recovery of 9 million b►orels of crude oil by usin secondo,ty vocovery � `f tochai ues . xMisti» oil operations would only recover i apprOXIMtely 500 , 000 barrels of crude oil . a 3.1 . a F.easi 11 : The "no project" alternative in feasible . 3 .2 . 1 c.x J 2t i _.a.t..., The "reduced Intensity" alternative would involve drilling a number of 1imi.ted injector wells for secondary oil recovery, while retainifig all existing wells currentlyupperatin In the 160--acresubsurface unit . ApproximatelyfO injector wells Mould be dr.ille4 from one of the existing well sites . 3. 2 . 2 COMPASiXeM 21. -U9,.ZXZ0r- w of the Alteruatiye to thgZtf1kCtg,n the Proposed. Fret : The City hereby finds that this alternative is not environmentally superior to the rroject . (a) The "reduced intensity" alternative would not rasult in the abandonment of 22 scattered wells over a 160-acts area. Therefore, cowpared to the proposed Project , it womId increase the number of residences which res e.1n, ' ad jalceat to oil-producing uses . Some of these residences are within20 feet of txi of ing wells ; i therefore , these residences wold be lets buffered from the � noise isrpacts of reworking toe utells . This impact would be particularly significant in the Villa St . Croix site , In which fine wells are located within 20 feet or less of condominium units . This alternative also would require Touting high- pressure water through lengthy pipelines Under City atteets . The possibility of leakagr. or rupture Is a significant adverse impact vhich would not exist under the proposed Project . Existing facilities wl-uld not withstand a nta,jor aartt quake . (h) . This aiternati ve also would have positive effects . It vould eliminator the need for three heavy i trucks per day to travel through the neighborhood adjacent � to the Project Site during the drilling phase of the Project ; would eliminate the possibility of a fire or a spill of oil or hazardous chemi,co is on the Project Site ; 42 . , a I 1 �ri rat ..y,.r i' ■ r 1 f and would elftinate the os+vibility of dema a to project faeilEAes and walls in the event of an oartbqunbe of a a# nitude of 118 or greater . This alternative also d eliminate the use o'1 Perimeter galls WhIeb Would be ' rerp led to animate aesthetic and noise impact" of the we prb act . to Frei hiss the positive &ad ne isti ve a fects of f1kit a2tetnat,1ve, hovevet, the City DAe k' .det�r�t�rinMd that th* positive effects of this alter 4ative #f• ledo signifitoLut than the negative effects 3 .2 . ctiXeneam. ._l tiai Pinje_._�t,, ►fib ne The teduced nte,ssity alternative Would not Meet Pro a objectives bi:cause it Mould not result in opt.ilrruu Well spacin for injection. As a result, only a_ _ owleattly 3 .5 million 11arr:els or oil would he recovered. 3 .2 . 4 The reduced intensity alternative is not leas i'b1 e . t of Jndint■ : This alternative would require acqqu ring the right-of-way fer a considerable lengtlx of underground pi es . Liability for these piper could be significant . 9ccording to the Project appl i cant , the Capital costs of this alternative wou d be Approximately the spume as the capital costs of the proposed Project , while leer than one-balf . as much oil would be v ecoveredY In addition, this alternative would not sesul.t, in optima spacing of injector wells . If secondary recovery lid not work under this systers, there would be no way to deteralae the source of the problm or � to cure the situation, Based on these factors , the Project applicant hae concluded that this alternative in not economically feasible. This alternative also is not feasible because it Is not desirable , and may not be possible , to condracl-0 well i reworking In very close proximity to residential unit@ . � 3 . 3 3 .3. 1 DeggtAatim. .Alternative,: Under this il Ir��� alternative, the proposed project would proceed wr described in this Z12o except that the drilling pro raa i would t e" intensified to ' reduce the time (span of the drilling phase of the ?aoject . A second rig would ',2e used for drilling . The two-year drilling period would be reduced by several months . 3 . 3 . 2 ,G at U'_Ug affects of the AllAMILWElk to UM Ufact2 of t S�. ppr��ed���t : The City hiereby 43 , 590 i 1 .. r 'n• t: 1 -S rd' 1' � r findis that the ,more intense drilling Prows" alternativeis riot ea►vi raamentaliy- eaperior to the Psojeect . (h) Approximately twice as man heavy trucks got d&ar (6 last**& of 3) WAId be se v�ised for the iatewiti*4 pp drilling r ogtam. Two 1650 s n would be need instead of in one►, resulting it increased atsCheNkic impacts and making p it more difficult to control noise and light/flee impa►-,-te . (b) The Project site would be occupied for oil�produciag facilities for a slightly shorter perior of glee , becanve the intensif Jed drilling program would acts . Imhs rt►duc* the construction period by several months . *V the drilling pba►ss , including the noise and traffic i1spacts %aitbough intensified) , also Mould occur over a slightly shorter time period . When weighed against the viore severe and uinitigable impacts that mould occur , - however , this reduction in the drilling, period does not oautweighi the negative hiepscts of this alternative . 3 . 3 . 3 zJ_rgctf v&ne■z in-jiggling. Pro i g:tOb J 4: The "note intense drilling protraw alternative would meet the Project ob jective:s . • The "note intense drilling program" is fea-sible o but s?ould be more expensive than the proposed �. Project. 1. 3 , 4. 1 110OCKi2tion of AltatuAtive : Under this alternative , the ail facilities on the Project site Would be removed and 11 scattered wells over 160 acres would be abandoned , as under the proposed Project. The Project site and the 6 scattered sites would be available for other uses . Residential use is designated in the General plan and Zoning. � 3.� 4. 1 �1�,ieo�...g, the off�tQ -at thil fit -a na JXjL..17& Chip xgi*etts of t1le ..� M i "wee `city he eb finds that ' this alternative it environmentally prefeeratle to the Project because it Would eliminate the effect of oil-producing uses throughtout the Project Area . 3 . 4 . 3 UJA=bEeneng . ia`1102tiaa� .i .. ct This alternative would not result in the recoveiry of any oil from subsurface reserves . Therefore, it Mould not sleet the Project objectives . It would reduce the ano:xnt I l 44 . i i { 1' !t�U. A y r 1 1 of oil wbieh could be produced frm 5 million barrels to Nash bairtels . 1' Jbflity: This alternative is not feasiblef Vacta.- as of z1adi"alk: it is highly u iitely tMt to o 1 rato rt rout a1.1 agree to abandon'• their' cations., aW that (b) ready purchasers would be avalla� fir all o the sites . Therefors . in order to implement this alternative , the City probably would have to acquire the mineral rights for some or all of the wells and pay for the abandoment of the site . Some arrangement would have to b* rude with the surface owner for r*isebuteeaent of All ©r part of the City' r cost$ following resale mad/or dtvalopment of the site$ . 3 , 4. d rgamt.b, JtX: This alternative is not feasible , It to higaly unlikely that (a) oil operators mould all agree to abandon their o eratione. .end that (b) ready purchasers would be available for all of the sites . Therefore , in order to implesreut this alternative, the City probably would have to acquire the mineral rights for some or all of the wells and air for the abandonment of the $its $ Some arrangement would have to be made With the surface owner . for roUbutsament, of all or part of the City,s costs following resale end/or development of the sites . As a rough estimate , using the industry standard of $159000 per oven ge dAily barrel of oil production, it � would cost appt;111,' tely $1 . 5 million to acquire the mineral rights tot all of the sites . Abandonment would cost a proxiaateiy $ .5 nillion . This alternative also would deny access to the royalty owners of the Mineral *states . Even assuming that the mineral rights could be purchased for $1 .5 million, this fi ure doer not assign ally value to unrecovorerd reserved , which are worth in the tens of aillions of dollars * This altartative does not appear to be "feasible . rl 3 . 5 ALTEM&TT S,ITLS : RUGEL 1 3 . 5 . 1 Daeo;istiort of Alternmtime: Parcel 1 consists of 1 . 8 aches located t,. the northwest of the Project site on Pine Street , bounded by Torhtown Avenue on the north and *Mica Avenue on the South . The Project applicant does not own the surface or the mineral& below the surface . The Huntington Pea4h lompany is the mineral owner . Parcel 1 is surrounded by approximately 15 acres of fee laud which 45 . 5954 • `y drr� Is also owned by the Rantingtoin breach Carpany. Alt hou h We land is currently vacant . it is soned for residential 'r Parcel 1 3e too small to acep=odate all of the ROCI itiol aQd well cellars necessary got on oil secovarry t4ollity . Thereforoo the Project 74tilitiOS Site mould * " t 11 No used . ithou h some wells could bt drilled ce � 4rctl 1 , 'fore wells would still have to be it i llod on the Project Drill Site. rW of than...IM „ _, o n � h hereby tads alternativetb s i a environmentally superior superior to the Project . Approximately 60% of the wells for the Project could a drilled on Parcel 1 . Although this would result in a s1i ht reduction in the effects of the 4rilliD& phase on the neighborhood surrounding the Project , drilling would affect two residential neighborhoods instead of one. Although the area surrounding Parcel 1 currently is vacant , it is 46 proposed for sesidentiai use . 3 . 5 . 3 z'f ect is neb s in_._ lslz,i Zra l armt Obj Shiva This axternative would meet Project objectivev . 315 . 4 ]'eea3bi],ity: This alternative is not feasible . itn in S end ,lam...... 'ind�: The Project applicant does not own Parcel 1 . Purtbernore, in order to use Parcel 1 as t surface site to drill Into the southeast ppart of the Springfield unit, the Project Applicant would gave to acquire Re se--thi,ough rights from the Huntington beach Company. City has been advised that the suntington beach Company is planning a surface development for the 17 acres site surroundinS Parcel 1. and that it would not be interested in delaylog this development for the 20-30 year life of the project . Therefore , the alternative is not "feasible" because it is not capable of being accoarplishad succesefullly in a reasonable period of time, taking into account economic , social , and legal factors . 306 . 1 q;;_t32t QZA -, ar Alternative : A project designed to be solely developed from parcel 1 would need to be reduce) in size considerably . The l . a acre site would 46 . 1 3 eCe ata a roBirately one 20-well cellar and much "s les 61vati m eetton fd►eilMes . The soutbeasterlt tio� t ► �fo4ec� could be reeked by directional { lI ergo Pair 04 1 to that portiou of tbo telervoirs good 49t, be exploited. 3r4 . : e C 4 ttby 4 t t e a tet"t va a�auid have ena�ieoa "tal effects of a maguit+ede equal to those of the Project . in figppay& ' p : Althou h the area eurfoundi Parcel curreutl,y sn vacant , it is proposed for residential use . Project impacts , including aesthetic impacts, the possibility of Dire and impacts of an M 0 or greater earthquake , would affect any such residonces . 3 . 6. 3 In ge rate A itAX : This alternative would not meet Project ob ecti`vs• because it could only recover 4ppr=LILately 4,S million barrels of oil siuce injection rater would have to be lower and the Project could not be fully' developed , It would also take longer to produce the reserves . ► 3 . 6 .4 reasibiility: T'hi• alternative it not feasible. : The Project i applicant does not own Parcel. l . Pu*thersore, in or4ar to ose Pare*l 1 as a surface site to drill Into the southeast naart of the Springfield Unit , the Project applicant would ve to acquire pass-throu h rights from the Buntingtou II Company. 7b a City Tax been advised that the IVntington Beach Commany it plannilateel a surface develo nt for the 17 acres site iurroundin 1, and that�t would not be interested in delaytng this development for the 20-30 year life of the project . Therefore , the alternative is not "feasible'l' because it it not capable of being accomplished surcewullly in a reasonable period of firs, taking into account economic , social , and legal. factors , 3 . 7 &TJMWJVJc • 3 . 7 . 1 Bad gn,IYMOLA_tlau►a : Parcel 2 to located on the r'outh►eaet corner of Beach Boulevard and Adams Avenue . It consist$ of approximately 3 . 3 acres and ie zoned 01 : Parcel 2 is located at the extreme southeastern and of the SSpriatfieid petit and would require walls to be drilled which exceed the normal parameters of conventional 47 . 5954 itectio"I drilliftso fhe site to too mall 90'r the ailitios msceesa: to aeto*yan the welly. �erefore, till Project rocilities site maul still be need . +,r 3, 7- USU : The City eroby �N. .r gods that t s *1tevnat ve is not eavi tonweat-3 . r" preferable to the Project trin 2"Opart.__ of Zindi ed : Under this alternative , there would be a greater buffer to residential areas , and there to direct access for traffic from heath Boulevard . However , impacts from the drilling of wells would affect residential arenas and would be increased under this alternative because the wills would require a longer trajectory and would take considerably longer to drill . Drilling impacts would affect the people living in part of the Seabridge project because Parcel 2 is in close prozinit to this develo sent . The first phase, Serabr i dge V'ilfage , consists o 200 units . The Recond prase , the sakes at Seabridge, is planned for 202 units . 3. 7 . 3 YHR' This alternative would most the Project -objectives . 3. 7 . 4 Z&W tX: This alternative is not feasible. yjc:tm in SuR1Rprt of ga; The Project { app,plicaat hasp been a v red that the property owner Lie piann,ing a outface development on Parcel 2 when the existing Chevron wells are no 'longer viable, and would not be interested in delaying this development for the 20-30 year life of this alternative . Therefore- the alternative 3r not "feasible" because it it not capable of being accomplished successfully in a reasonable period of time, taking into aczount economic , social, and legal factos. In addition, the site configuration would not allow ,for the drilling of the necessary wells , even if the facilities were located on the pacilities Site . • 3 . 8 .w # UCIL 3 , 8 . 1 . ose,xi9tign- ofYM.& tar1kat . Parcel 3 is bounded by Memphis Avenue on the north , Knosrville Avenue on the south , riorido Street on the west , and Beach Boulevard on the east . I . consists of approximately 6 .2 screw and is zoned C--4 (Nihefty Comertial ) facing Beach Boulevard And R-3 (Medium--Rallh residential) on the remainder of the site . 48 . �"' Ap1 4 FI•w'1 "j "'�'^l.Rh' ,1 )' , Y. I., 'L. .., .fl 1Ir!/i rig f Y.I• TTT_•'�' A F f 8rreez S fd ;ted at the taw soutboaetoto �• 1 ri telIT egad Maald require wellsto bed i16ith exed the norwa l pa r"Ote r s of Convout i onal 0 � , WASS. 340 JuGmad it aft ! e P ego tbAt f toxe>� v'e a 6*0 samentally prOOZO4 le "are Weser ing rCd ors o Ce the a to is aper . pa:cal bow pond we fortruck �rafc to b►eacb • d tpoi stiev aul the wells could be 'a io - Mf ed Cote Igoe i t e , reduce the perimeter of the o ro 1048 area is could reduce the Impacts of oil opo��t� d ► �atr i� residential stoats. IOr N altetruk ve would not snot the Project objectives. Tbir alternative d o0k t e a ect object via of reeaVeri 9 NUion Lark• Is of oil, because wells would be una • to eh the Oldest Vert of the sere f r . it • estimated IRS that it "old rpouit in the recovery of a "alum of b 11io4 barrels of oil $ •�JIIj 3 .0.4 - WOW I. U: This alternative is not feasible . The Cityhats been rridod t ' s %16filton Beach ON pOany to Planning a outface deve?'opaNnt oa —rrei 3 when the existing Chevron faecititise site no to a triable, and Mould not be is"r'Otdstsd in dolayins tbis development for the 20-30 year U •e �qf t o ternat �►e. Therefore o the altermativo is so "f#tit# 1e" bedanse it is not ca abi.e of bei acc lirhed successfully' in a reasonable period of iae talc into account economic , social, OW legal factors. The alternative also would be economically infeasible . The load coats of the alternative site would be prohtbitAvely hfth bec&aoe of the C-4 ay.' R-3 toning. No &ore-for-Dare stray► with the Project site would be � possible 3.9 13M .512MG, ZAR"Mr a 3 . 9 . 1 banctigtion at AldKntin: parcel. 4. ReCallen PAtk a If located great of Delaware Streit between To:ktown Avome and Utica A"aue . It is a dedicated park ovaed by 49 . .w✓•M) 5954 'w 1 c yJ,, JJ{y 00 14 ,i�,•.f'y+ M' Ih R e MY Ow aoomists of a 20214ate ly 5.1 acres . tr ng titer are resideatfaN at-S? . M, r , 1, Ahl : The CRY or* 1-90- t this altoi,utive s aft envi somrentally glee to the Project Atka All SuRgdrt of The f&cilities and the wells could be consolidated onto one $its , reducing the erimetet of the oil -producing Ate&. Sowever , the rosibility of upset would be increased , because all of e wells would Me to penetrate the main portion of th Inglewood-Newport fault . Well damage by fault stoVeaent is A well-known phenarmeuon in the Wilmington oil field , even when no measurable earthquake has been recorded . Although surface soma a Ito the wells or surface in/tal7•ation/ tObably would not occur , down hole damage at the fault nteircept would preclude the proper abandonment of the damaged wells . 1. Eel This alternative also would eliminate a dedicated ark. :'his impact could be partiallymiti ated by conducting a "sand swap" in which the Project applicant 1 tre4ed the Project site to the Cit A pare couldthen be established on the Project site . a park on the Project site would he smaller than the existing 5 .8 acre mite and vourld come i st of two separate parcels divided by a street , creating an adverse safety impact . 3.q. 3 IKfact ivenaeNO iA Fasting Pro j et.Ob irciyes : This alternative would meet Project objectives . 3.9. 4 reA/ibilitV: This alternative is not feasible . y,&Cts infiggg2rt of lrindi g : The City dots not desire to exthanga McCa,l lest Park for the Project site. Safety issues relating to the need to drill through the luglevood-Newport fault make thin a lass deniable alternative . 3 . 10 IMIM DZNSITXJMSL=TAL ZR=T 3 . 10 . 1 ••Btc.t49t►J.2 . WAat.iM Neither block of the Project site would be used for oil recovery, but Instead would be wade available for deveylo ent of a medium density residential development prorect . oil recovery operations would '.ontinue at the Zl wells within the 160 acre Project Area . At density levels permitted "by the General Plan, the Project Site could be developed with 76 residential units . Tbe Huntington Peach Ordinance Code ! 50 • �� r e I*" goy J&Q dovelopeat of 1fe writs#, and other aer allow a greater amber of units • � � � sae �fo d#e . r` O MY erg y ;i* Irt Me AlWAiLtIva is not earn roaesentally "p6tior to the Project . lttt• t a 1"AA S1 of zindiu s 'a) This alternative would not result in the abasiomont of 23 scattered wells over a 164-acre area. Therefoie. cmpg red to the project, it would increase the hmebes of tesidences which romain adjacent to oil-producing uses , The ezietinf wells maald continue to � produce oils lac and water without the addition of the modern vapor recovery pystenst secondary recovery tothniques s or state-of-tire-art fire fighting egos eat which will be incorporated into the Vroject . Too continuing use of existing technology Mould have detrimental impacts on air quality compared to the proposed projects The potential for arrestint subsidence at causing rebound , through injection would be elislhateds These brine produced by Chevron would not be used Z r injection and would continue to be disposed of In the *ewer $yet*& thereby increasing the load on the sewer system in comparison with the proposed Project . Zzisting facilities would not be able to withstand the impacts of major earthquakes . (b) This alternative also would have positive offects . It would eliminate the Aced for three heat/ trucks per day to travel through the usiShborhood adjacent to the project Bite during the drilling phase of the Project ; would eliminate the possibility of a fire or a spill of oil or hasardou• chemicals an the project Site ; and would eliminate the possibility of damage to Project facilities wad was is in the event cif an earthquake of a ma nitude of h f or greater . This alternative also would 611mi.nate the uss of perimeter walls, which would be required to mitigate aesthetic and noise impacts of the pro sed ',.Pr'oj act . In weighing the positive and negative environuental affects of this alternative , however , the City has. determined that the positive effects of th i c" alternative are last significant than the negative effects . (t ) In addition, the "medium density residential development" alternative also has the adverse envi romOntal impact# associated with the construction and occupancy of residential units . The construction of 51 . t 5954 e 1 'T u r 1 rrji'p0.4 0;r 1 i4 fl ir�r, � r • . Irr I 1 9614e is• � .r,, ,, l Dolts V"14 involve the tMarary impacts � lir sssactated with roe ontiai COROUV IQn di itrcreagod noise, t'taffta f 4204 risk of Fite, 0604. such caeetruction related Impactor , u f w1e ► ai" "BUS 60 a r, f. Traffic gets Ate skiosociat@4 04 b the M 01 of renta artlrr tee 64votved with residential un tr . Such salep of testing related t"aCts say occur O"t a period of between thane months and a year . Rolle , r traffic , pairki g , risk of residential lure are irnpacts assocites with thi occupancy of residential units . Such isPacts would he potmanost . 3. l o. 3 Affactimeng in KIMIUSIS Praient Objectiva; The "no project" alterriat vt would z6t aset Project objectives because it would not pewit the recovery of S million barrels of crude oil by using secondaryrecovery te'Auiqu es . �3stia oiI operations would only recover �r approximately 5009000 barrel# of Crude oil . 3 . 10.4 •amihili&y; This alternative is feasible. i 52 . Y yl!••y.,•Y k J{hr � ;{ �V, .• �� 1r�� ; Jf .;r,ri M�. ryµ;'{AF: ;"�h�y�tr�!a4 y U ,,.'err,"1+` r��v+' � f��'f'��4�y��h��1�,4 'Se����^, ` �,�}vlr�y��i TI4 L �r�,.' 70 Uj�r„kdf Nf si 'Y' ,ir#iz�'•� i a ,, �}i, ��',r,!',. it�G.,' S.�!4�rye , r nAe�� X, c�� • 'Sr,� .� '� r1' v¢ 4r �l.'. � N� +l' r�ir�y v�7�,.7�'.7'!k • r , i• � l , � k. pi,1, i �•��<Y4 �`;F�� � y�i, TP7� i�" �, •• ,, � ' •. •r � �� � •`� ,�ifj�R •,� ,1/,��N nrAm Tho r ttr '•Y n final Supplemental Xaviromoantal Impact Report no. 55-1 and "virroMentsl Impact Report so . 86-1 for the Springfield Oil Ilec000ry Project identifies certain unavoidable adverse significant h enviv uaantai effects . CZqA sidelines, Section 15095, requires the docisic•a-Maker to balance the benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether the i� project ect should be approved . If the decision-maker concluded that, the bohefita of the project outweigh the unavoidable adverse oiav:roMoatdl effects, the effects may be considered acceptable. The final EIR identifies three separate unavoidable adverse envi.rommanta l Impacts. (See $act ion 2.0. Draft Supplemental SIR as-1 . ) These are: 1• hS : Tht neighborhood surrounding the project bite consists of w0ium density residential uses , predominantly in small (3-10 r unit) developments and single family residences . Views of tine 5 f project site from adjacent residences will consist of the x� screening block wall and landscaping. During the initial drilling phases, drill rigs will be visible . During the production and injection phases, temporary drill gigs will be used periodically for maintenance and will be visible from adjacent residents . Tanks will be visible above the wall . er.hibit e 5954 '� 5�'IK'rK;Wr , .l 't " . • ih'e',•,ern 7.r..�'.s {... ,� y _ _ M f {T• Lil JM Y'1 �lS1 � e 1ti1 ,jy, +��yy,,,, A �(y�7�4�Ari r1'rlr_Rr'����"� .I� y :ram"' {, rF �4� C '4 rflY: Sk R f I �,ar ,i� �,? ✓ F r ��3 P i�y �' r/'• ) s �`�tY, �1►r F'x,�{� s„ „�1' r,, �'1(�'t' use .� t.-.}t.�' �, r>?l 1. WPM' � �� • � � •A�{IAT; 1 .J •i�i�i r.�y ��``* i"' iV��. +.( �k �A�,if" F�r��,, IF'M1 'f ^ � 'r W✓�s r A� fid`" y' 1�� y �It '-+'4 •�.Y'W .}tiai lb�l '� v�d�i a� ��" 1 . � �''�'„!i 4r d�74j. L� �'`' �f�Fs+ , i R1'• +M1,�'} °i f 5 �'c�� }i � y� e� b q�A �i Y,#�Yh1 { �•� ,' �. { � �y,R. y� y,{�" � i � r�*fir '" " (� � y�j�I� )W YYrY "f `►�r� r � � n 57,��'+ � .s �{, Adr�' �S' 1 i�� A r� 'r �� )'"',. 1' •.r !Y '(1 ✓I 11 •.R; 2 A r I�� rwr,l,� S Cyril ;��yj�� Idf "I 4,+ �.. 4, ,t� A �• + v LhF' jl. �i.•J .'�4}'•u i�;, :�, ,A ,wl' y '�',81.1;` 11 ��� A,��` r�+v`w r r.)r�I' �' '�f( ��W��>� 'r,ll J� n1� sTr�Nq �w'r'��•ynr A''{ r + MLAM 'rya' '•.>�� � � +� �;� ' '��i'' off'jrp i •'" . lot ,t $moato, assuming that ell oil tanks are t t -or* set out iah an epee field without s ir: porter "alli, there is s "gaze �Oei�i� fie the A ste sXd "t clog7 for risk 684e0smant so lslQ,000 to 1. 10000,000 GhGMW that an oil tank litre Could result in �M1 radiant host effeating that ares outside of the i mediate project sit*. 8, �g It as earthquake of magnitude of 8 . 8 or greater on the Richter r 8Ca'lg oCCur* with its eple enter in the project ores, strueturea r iu the prejeet Area* Including tanks and walls of the project Q , facilities,- would be damaged. X40h of these effects is lessened by the mitigation measures suggesta4 in the Supplemental and original RJR, which measures will be regrfired and incorporated into the project. Here, the City of Huntington peach does find that the benefits flowing to the City and its raa:idents from the project outweigh the significant adverse environAental effecter which remain after the project's mitigation messurax are i.mPlemented and that the of orement toned ''u,navoi.dablt significant effects are acceptable, based on they following overriding considerations : I a + -l- (14664) $954 r i' %• � � i4^ I.'11' al s �r r� { . 1'• �S J/l4h I Y LY-i� 1�R' y .I 1� �I 1 �' t�� �. y, r I r• r �l'+yy �. � 4 n �r ,y��yl�yr I �C },I���� �r�•� .�r fllA'!!;'. II��'��A'��'f;4• r1 �' ti ����yy1,� � , � q� i �� •,�; �E�.r" �, 1 ,•� {�+IJ ? w a IJ,�� #,. it �� 'f"� st'�, IS-�� R� + �. I' r 1 a• o I li pp Y�I �,A � r,��d � 4 < �{.,■��.Y r� {'� I' R ��;' t s I•'�� ,Y.� I.4 {., I � tr V a� n a , Ilk' i will toplim If osisting tanks which sacs not Cols for Mix Vollutonts. This will r04041t in a r ,, sett. oa ► �a► : , 1 4 posses aI troosrbO4 ssion* 06t Jose# or. to 47 Pece at rs4action In hydrocarbon *"lesions. ftttb*r reductions in hydrocarbon aaraisAfts will also result hose the ellaainatioen of other antiquated process equipmse3nt . 3 . The proj*et will bring about the abandonment of 22 scattered wells over sae 2e60-s+cre area . As s result, the abandoned sites +yen be used tar other purposes cons-Latent with their General Plan and Xoning designations . rower City resi.dento will live adjacent to or In close proximity to oil activities. This will have positive aesthetic impacts on the City. 16 The project Mill result in the abaadowmat to modern standards of wellk WZ.Ach have been abandoneeled# but not to modern standart,s . This will contribute to the public health and � "afety. 4. The couxolidation of a number of oil producing operations on a single site 'with modern fire control equipment, will reduce the woftlood of the City five department . This will c-tntribute to the public health and safety. S. The project will use eapprozi.mateely 30, 000 barrels of produced water for injection purposes. This water Is currently dumped Into the sanitary surer by Chevron. This will reduce the demand on the sanitary sewer system. b . The use of water injection hasr been shown to aarrsa%': subsidence, or even cause a slight rebound . The project will help to street subsidence In the Huntington Beach oil field . -3 - (1466d) i 5 5964 1' 1.- y Y !SI 4+ ��r(!". '( R _/1$, �I 1 ? � !,`}''� � �Y. �� 1R rr�l �1 p,.�� rA�• �'-� }f � •,}��' �b� �l f ti•�L 'B.. .�• v'e � 1 !� Iv' 'til. 'rx � I L ,, J:� irl .r .; �y k �rt.r , •7 r,M,�,IY r•,r '.. r�yd.' r , . aryri�► t� . i. 'f'i,' ,Y'•. y i , ,1 11 J.i ,'� ��� �, •� �• 41 �4' : .�` µ11 I •. ... .'i +yflRly,.'�i�,.a rlr�w��r ,� d � 1':�'! I' :�d..I,:i, ° .`` � � , ',1, 'Y3 , + Amtbor isupostaut Coustderstion is the increase in all OROGiAotion, from 5 161111on barrels of oil to 9 million barrels $` ' " � i s �► ltI" ETom the oonsolidatior:. oil will be used a .� �.11,, " q ► p .gaxoli (1dd million gallons) and other petroleum 1� pit- 1 fto (162 M111on gallons) . r 1• •1� I JJ I 1' 1 r 4 it I , 1 `r� I i r J1 I �I t � I I I+ I , -,�- (14646) 47� ,cS''. •� C ■ Vi � '� r I- zo i l I JY 1 N *y� Yr 7V j � '�•�'1+5 `,i ,,,� e • I ,a 1� " ^.:�.,N, vh(rL4 y in ■ {,`.rw it• , 4.. RESOLUTION NO . 1401 ■ R 9960LOT ION Of THE PLANNING COMMI SSI CN OF THE CITY OE MUNTZROTON . BRACH, CALirORNIA, ADOPTING SUPPLLMENTAL %NVIR4MPTAL IMPACT REPORT NO . 38-1 (SEIR 88-1 ) AND SNMIitOWNEWTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 86-1 (EI•R 86-1 ) FOR TK9 SIPRINGFI 14D OIL RSCO'VERY PROJECT LOCATEn ON TWO St-OCKS ON OPPOSITZ CORNERS, SOUTHEAST AND NORTHWEST, AT THE xNTENSECTION OF SPRINGFIELD AVENUE AND CALIFORNIA STREET AND INCLUDING 160 ACRES OF SCATIEREG WELL OPERATIONS BOUNDED GENERALLY BY FLORIDA STREET ON THE EAST AND SEVPNTEENTH STRE'LAT ON THE WEST, .SETWEE:a YORKTOWN AVENUE ON THE NORTH AND MEMPH I S AVENUE ON f% SOUTH . WHEREAS# the Sprinifield Oil Recovery Project ' s related entitlements and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No . 88-1 ,have been prepared; and Environmental Impact Repert No. 805 -1 .:as adapted and certified by the Planninq Com►ai'setion on September 3, 1986 and City i Council on October 20 , 1986 ; and The City of Huntingi'on Beach was the lead agency in the . r preparation Of the Supplemental and original Environmental Impact E All persons and agencie3s wishing to respond to notices duly r € given have been heard by the Planning Commission either through vritteo notice or during a public hearing on October 18 , 19e8 , and 8uah responses and comments as were made were duly noted and ree 30611de>ed t6t N+OWO T9TZREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the: Planning Commission � of the City of Hun' tirngton Beach as fol lowe : -1- 7,777,',:� �•, 1 'I .,C, Jti .� 11 l - � .Y,,,' '.'rF:,� "�''I'!•r •+ AS 3 YeYr ' 4 ' •,; S ,y T1.. • 1 r* '' `• 1 ' .a<I:1 /�'L'.r,.�1}{I�, ','ii... .i., 4•tA�' 'rj i, I '�.••w,. Rr � -1 .Aj"�i , r'� ; Y„ +' i I: ;5 '.� "'I•,'',� •11:-:71 , / . ;i r I }�. rk�I r •W yl .L .a r,�aj{•:Ir 1i!'rti ,}S• ¢. a 9 r' ! 14 1. r.- 82MON 1 , The Planning Commission does hereby Hod that 0rpplestatal Environmental Impact Report No. 99-1 and Environmental 'R �•`�'„ "l et Re'p.,'rt No ,, 66-1 have b*on completed in compliance with the California, BnvirordWotal Quality Act and al.". state and local �{;;. �u�•d'�w��e� therefore; SECTION Z + The Planning Commission has considered all significant' offerta dota►iled in Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Noo' 96-1 and'. Environmental Impact Report. No. 86-1 , together Vith stisting and proposed meiaures ho, mitigate such significant 1,.. oftecta. ( Exhibit A) �j SECTION 3. The Planning Commission further finds that through the implementation of thy' afok•amentio-aed mitigation 4, meafuress the Majority of the potentially adverse impacts sesocimted with the Springfield Oil recovery project can be eliminated or reduced to a level of insignificance. SECTION 4. The Planning Commission f finds that the i y benefits Accruing to the city, both economically and socfallyp by Virtu* of the eooeelidat'ion of existing oil producing operations to t a single trite, abandonment to modern standards of many existing s wel.lh. *o4. .feplac*"nt to modern standards of existing tanks w • = override the un'IoWgatable effects detailed ! n Supplemental Seavironmental Impact Report No. $8-1 and Environmental Impact Na . 06-1 and the attreched statement of overriding considerations (Exhibit h) . '. dw2., -- J. e nh.�SV �drbl ik`�l ' 'C`' 4 r,�''�S 1 ir,, � Mr} q, I, N' •j°Th� K T.•.�. JRY'�°!w�.ti� '•'1*Z,: �r.w ..r .. .. .�• 'r�r,. +w,.a .�iMrw►„,w.»�-ter.-.• ..r.�+��rr—�•�*'s+"»� ,�. ,. ». . .r-• ..�. .�..... ,....y...y,rti W G^'dr+ri $RC?IQN S. she Planning Caaaiesion cf the 'City of Huntington Beach does hereby adopt and certify an adequate Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No . 0h�-1 and ad' ot and r recmrtify is adequate Environmental Impactftport Na. 0 =1 and bra coomenda that the City Council adopt and certf fy as adequate Supplemental environmental Impact Report No. 88-1 and adopt and 3 recertify as adequate Environmental Impact Report No. 86-1 W PASSED AND ADOPTED by the planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on yI the 18th• day of October... 1988, by the following roll call Vito it AYES: Slates , Silva, Leipzig, Sourguignon N096 s Ortega* Livengood ABSENTt Nana ABSTAINS- Oiggins ATTEST : Victor L p Planning CQotigsion Secretary Planning commission Cbairaan I 1 "PROVED 0 TO YOU, 1 . ` City x rti�y L'. l r9y11�rp^^,.rr'. 1 ,.y Y.' w3,* Y 1 nr ll'. I• , 11i h�V t ',,, Yt , �\fi.:F�Ist'f+y T��" �, r a��Y r}yw r\"��7iw,T M A, t y• 4 1 a ,.,,C.,^ ' •, '� � a. .' - '. }� ' y^ ,, y i Age w. 7. 7 �/."Y.!r _:Ir,1't:•... 1 .,dsr Yi1T..•,t 4 .:9'M 'Mr'• . Rs 'a •''' w M' 1 „f, . '';;� y,'Yr.jgly,i•, 1,y :r 7 rXIMING0 AO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL rOR SOMS CWQ5 lift. 88:1 AND USE PZ MIT NO. 88-25 OR W1 I Iroxi OV 8Y TM PLANING COMMISSION on 41MEMR is, 1988 A.. Ob O Of saM from 0014town 8 ecific Plan, District Two-O" l mitt s esoluding 4011 Drilling) to "Midtown Speciric tlmn, pistrict 1-81" (Oil (operations including Oil Drilling) ' ptil sthlAq with surirounding residential uses based on wilti ti at am bardle dosc' ribod in the envirotattentai intact ;ate dei •6n: of approval outlined in the use permit . ti• R , 220 proposed some ohamge in consistent with the goals and policies of the Geriarel Plan. Dnitim6tion and consolidation of esi,sting oil operaticns it; encouraged because it reduces the 1bnd ;urea used for oil facilities . Apprcl;:kimately 5. 3 scree of i*1*Pable; ,2aAd will bdtome available after the consolidation on tho two blocks (3 .2 acres) . as. tion 6662 of Article 068 of the City' s Zoning Code pt6,0140s fGr the obtablisbment of "ol" Districts . The only limitation for such an 01 District is that of a minimum eorgact area (100 Eeot br 150 feet) , as required by Section ` .1. The prorasod dri 11 site for the project is '4 6nst'dorsblf larger than the minimum dimensions required by Mwtton 8661 . 1. Therefore, it in consistdnt with this ,. provision. Too.do `%82 .R re gpiarea .Medication, or an irrevocable ofter 0 'Vie. of 11 real propprty that that City r 1►:.,r Its mbr . . oots sod othir llc itavice 24011#168 A or i >hts . All Cit�r�requi�red i�catiioris ,M'1 be, �Mvlsmnt6d through the terps of recorded tract mipd ;gor �, fa pro t Blair. Therefore, the project is coasistei%t > 4th th &, t istoA Y, 96 t: will r v* oil roducin facilities frosts s .s; ,b ,� � � muAtting the ytento totion o9' ofi altosdd'att" =teCC'es . Althotioh 'oil producing tacit* 4e8 wir1.1 raWi'A1 ori the project sate, the .�Vpesreecet 4. of tba Or6j6at rike will be unproved over its p,yrcaent "'. dotAiti.on. Thetbfore, the project is consiotent with this roll �d. Wltb respect to the Land Use Clement, policies have been ttonsloted into a Boning and Land Use Element Consistency Ifttri:. IM tna~trix shone that as a miscellaneous district -01 MBy be c:otgb A4d (1 .e. is consistent) with any land usa cetegor . It i$ 81pecifically consistent with low, medium 84 Mdiun-high donrtty residential categories . jj1 '�,� �' 1• � ti '!.',�tir'"ti y:•ii •s IT.fIW��Iu i IV d a ti' r+'' 1 .. J.'1,.:.'�1/ v. t6 y �rM ti Y M � R •f v 1 �'„1'�A��+.+'i 7 .'r� t M.;r1yd" a Ire; r ♦.* � y1� + �ter, , P fA �J. s. A Oeserai plan Amendment is not required because the combimW acreage of the proposed site in loss than 20 acres a$ set forth in the Since Criteria for Determining Land Use Dosiq►ttions table contained In the general plant. {. w Co liaAce with Title 8 and Title ld of the Huntington Beach e1p0.1;,Co4b and the use permit condf Lions of approval will ute that the proposed use a i loud by the zone change will t #6 0trimotal to they general health, welfare, and safetyr, 1. The eg+t•ablie hment, maintenance and operation of the oil operation will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity, property and UVrovements in the vicinity of such use or building based on the conditions of approval and compliance with Title 6 and Title 15 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code. ' 1 . The proposed oil operation is consistent with the goals and objectives of the General Plou. Oil activities or* a consistent use in any land use category of the General plan. 3 . The ptojeCt will consolidate oi.i operations in one location reeduotof the visual imaact of numerous wells now spread throughout the Springfield ail Field area . Such consolidation will t1so be advaintagoaus for safety and noise reduction purposes . The project will result in the abandonment and rocl tion of 31 exiuti.ng wails and 16 oil storage tanks in the Springfield Oil Field area and will.. not significantly in^rease traffic is that area. { . Buppl*m0tal anvironmentnl impact Report no. 88-1 and Envireowntsl Impact itqport go, e6-1 have determined that any remining si+gtaificaut effects on the euvirommint fagad to be unavoideeble ore accep6u,sblee due to overriding considerations. Conditions ew.f approval for Use Permit No . 88-18 have eliminated or substantislly lessened all significant effects on the onviromawt where feasible. W. Tbo p;a *pt will result in increased tax revenues for the City of Balton Mach and other gavermantal agencies . w' 7. The coadittom of approval are desirable and necessary in order to effectuate the purposes of the Huntington Beach Municipal Cod*, t1w official C u 6ral Plan Land Use Plan and the beat interests of the City* purthr r , they include mitigation measures set forth in the final Environmental Impact k�port that will **sure the location is suitable for the type of use proposed and the following will not result or be rr:�asonably anticipated from the project : (1613d) ! i,S'�LM 'rd\!�-'v"' • > ' �•,�'. • is N 1l' .yi• .' • . � r .1Y u -46 i�r a. Damage or nuisance gram noise, snake, odor, dust or vibration; hazards from explosion, contamination or fire. b. Hazards occasioned by unusual volumes or character of 1 traffic- iwom stibilit with surrounding develo r_t . � � p Y 9 l� 04 The projopt comlies with all ne�u irmonts of Division 9 o L-or t�► Identified reduction of exterior s ideryard of ; applicable provisions of the Huntington alcipal Code. i. The conditions imposed include requirements of plans for the disposition of oil wells and for all operations on the property f; involved, and for bermap galls and landscaping to provide amsiai feasible screeniap of equipment and facilities . 9 . Changes hive been required and incorporated in the project to mitigate or avoid the significant adverse environmental effects of the project : a. The Division of Oil and Gas enforces rules and regulations for the conduct of secondary recovery operations . b. The mitigation measures incorporated, proposed and adopted, tagetb4r with application of the roles and regulations of the Division of ail and Gen, will substarr!,koilly mitigate all of the adverse impacts identifiede a. public agencies other than the City, including the Division of Oil and Cast Regional Water Quality Control Hoard and South Cosst Aar Quality Management District# will he reviewing aspects of this project for mitigation measures � �s to matters within their responsibility and jurisdiction, x'riaYuding au►tsurface aperstion, water and air quality; the critical used for oil renders infeasible the alternatives of ''no projort or dalsye►d project Implementation, and alternative surfpoe locations are Infeasible because of their limited availability, or the greeter disruption to the com mnity at large which would result therefrom. 10 . The subject location is oentrally' 'located within the Springfield oil field &x*aj relocating the proaposel project to r, another site is infeasible* 11 . Nu substantial public purpose would be seried by denial of Use Permit Mo. 98•-25 but rather: a. It is important %,hat the United States develop its aristing oil reserves in order to meet its energy needs without increasing dependence can foreign ol* Z, and this project will. result in incremental recovery of approximately nine (9) million barrels of oil; and �• # �SNC• "�',�,�' . ter•, . • i . d b. The project will consolidate oil operations in one location►, reducing the visual impact of numerous Twells now spread throughout the 02dtown portion of the City; and c. Such consolidation will also be advantageous for safety and noise: reduction purposes; and d. Tho PrOject will be oaly an interim use of the surface site iAvolvedi and at the termination of the project the site ' �• will td : available for recycling into other uses; and o. rho project will benefit and accrue to the general welfare of the City and the public for each of the roasons get forth above. f. Approval of this project will zedune the iomediate demand for more offshore drilling facilities . 12 . Thar proposed oil consolidation project will have 24 hour on-site personnel # and will be safer then the existing 064-continuous monitoring of the 31 scattered wells to be abaftdowW throughout the area . This will reduce the poasib2o Fi attraction of ,younger persons . 13. she: 'nost modern, efficient energy-savings equipment available will be integrated into the design of the project which will mitigate environmental impacts such as fire,, noise and air pollutants. 1,4. The applicant has submitted a property value protection plan which Kill be implemented as outlined prior to drilling . 15. The reduction of the exterior sideyard setbacks from ten (10) to seven (7) feet is fused on the following: a . The reduction of exteriox sidayard setback for perimeter � wall from ten (ld) to seven (7) feet will result in improved design and utility of the project. b. The design of the perimeter wail will be compatible Stith th6 Surrounding neighborhood. c. The proposed perimeter wall with reduced exterior sideykrd setbooks will not have a detrimental effect on the general health, safety, welfare or setback privacy of surrounding residents . d. Variation In the wall setback is provided through the, use of offset landscape pockets, architectural features and building materials . ( 1f13d) y J� ,VAL 1 4 ;1. Kw • L ti drl" 9Mx;rzONS o"EROYA . - us& pERKrT Plc. ef- &5 1 . The site plan, elevations and landscape plan dated received October 13, 1988, shall be the conceptually approved layout . a. This use permit shall not become effective until Zone Change No. 98 -11 has been approved and in effect . All structures and procedurea shall conform to Title 15 of the Hustintgton beach ttunicipal Code and the Division of Oil and Gas standards. 3. The applicant shall, obtain all necessary electric5l and building permits d. Noise monitoring shall be conducted under the supervision of an acoustical engineer certified by, the County of Orange. Reports shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development within three working days after the completion of each phase of the monitoring effect. The monitoring shall include the following: a. preAriiii 9 ghad0 monftaring. Prior to the start of the drilling phase, noise measurements r all be obtained during the operation of the specific drilling rig which has been selected and the measurements shall be related to those which will be eyxp6rierceed at the nearest realdiantial boundaries to the drilling site. In addition, the: noi`ae control measures hand been for will be) applied to the rig as needed for compliance with the Cary of Huntington Death noise Ordinance shall be identified, b. fitar - at.j2rill j". poise measurements skull be (obtained during the nighttime hours (10:00 PM to 7.00 AK) for at Yeast six ,hours on each of three nights within the five day period Erase the start of the drilling phase. Monitoring is to covur at the nearest residential boundary to the actual drilling operation. The noise level data shall be compared to these specified In the Citr of Huntington beech Aois• Ordinance by the Dopsrtm ent of Community Development . Where on exceedancee of the ordinaoo* is identified, noise control measures shall be applied and an oddi.tional two nights of monitoring uholl be required. C . MUring..the D=iYl3ng �. poise monitoring shall occur during a six-hour period between the hours from 10.00 PM to 7:00 AN at least once each month during the drilling phase of the l roject. The noise level date obtained shall be compared to the City of Huntington Peach Noose Ordinance stmada rds by the Department of Co .�rauni ty De ielopment . Where an erxce3edance of the: standards is ildentifiedr noise control Manures shall be applied and an additional two nifhts of monitoring shall be required. (161.3d) � � '��'1�..x• o` t^ ^� 1•,'fit H r S. fieasuse#o to reduce erosion should be used during grading and site VtOparation ■ Grading and construction activity shall take i place only during daylight hours after the issuance of a grading permit by the Department of public Works. 6. Wring gradirng and excavation, earthmoving crags should observe a*ts end spoils for potential archaeological finds . In the event of a potential find being located, operations shall be suspend" until the significance of the find ix determined. 7. A dust control program shall be submitted to the Department of Co nity Development for review and approval prior to the issuans:b of building Permits . S . All street itsproveshents for both tracts Mall be constructed after the heaXX .9XgdJYngL operations have been completed (approximately 4 w1eks) : a . Final grading, or- any ether ors-rite construction shall be prohibited until street improvement construction has commenced. b. Friar to any on-site construction or drilling, the masonry wall and all landscaping and street improvements shall be Installed subject to the approval of Department of Community Development and Department of Public Worms . 9 . prior to the installation of any landscaping, a landscape and Irrigation plan shall be submitted to the Department of CoMmunity Devealop"nt and Public Works for review and app-oval. a. All landscaping shall comply with Chapter 15.22 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Cole and all trees shall be minimum 24 inch best type and spaced no greater than 20 feet � on context 10. prior to the installation of the office structures, elevations shall be provided .for rev .v yr and approval by the Department of Coeaau►n l ty De#vee to n t . ? • , a. The office shall be on a permanent foundation. A raans4rd or pitched roof shall be provided. 11. : U applicant shall enter into a franchise agreement with the City for the installation of the underground connection between the two blocks, if required. 17. The paroper sealing and abandorawnt of the ezistifig scattered wells vehich *ill be replaced by this project shall take plane follawieq approval of this project and must *)e compt ated within eigbteen (18) rronthe . � l�bl3d) r R �r .r • M, 14 gift 1 13. The surface of the site shall be completely covered with an appr#Otiete material (Such as gravel and/or asphalt) subject to teviev and approval of Publics Works Department, Fire Department and Department of Comunitp Development. 14. A st prepared by aa acoustical engineer certified by the of QpaOlopmnt a shall be submitted to tho Department of ty for review and approval prior to 114 ,frilling. Said report shall describe noise levels at ' A OU0 oil site property line and at the nearest C481Qeritial property line both with and without an acoustical b� pket op the drilling rig and service rigs. The repot shall iicate Moiss attenuation measures necessary to ensure ci plisace with thr Huntington Beach poise Code. This ,shall include the provisions of the ordinance Code regarding maximum houslp average noise level at nemrest residential property line of 30 MA) during nighttime hours between 10: 00 pM and 7:00 AN. a. A double acoustical, blanket enclosure shall be provided at son-door entrances . 15 . Moles attenuation for the drilling operation, tail operation and service operations shall be provided pursuant to the oil Code and noise report specified in Condition 14 . a . if a noise violation occurs, the entire drilling structure shall be `gapped witbl an acoustical blanket for greater noise attenuation. 16 . No sp+eekers, loud bells or butters shall be employed on site . 17. Racessive vibration, as determined by the Department of Conwaity Development , shall be reduced to acceptable levels . { 1p . L$ 4 sad glare shall be directed and/or screened to prevent I "spillage" onto adjacent residential properties and shall be uporeT efficient subject to the requirements of the Building Divir on. 19. All heavy truck traffic shall be limited to the following streets betweerA the 405 freeway and the subject site: Beach 9oul9v*v4# Adams Avonuep and Delaware Street . For entrance to the site oisly Springfield Avenue :And Cb lifornis Street may be used, 20. Reavy truck traffis +6hall be limited to the hours between 7:00 AN and 5:00 PN. ao So trucks may park on the street . b. Truck deliveries shall be staggered so that no stacking shall occur on public streets. t r 7 " y, '� r�"'p�1µt " ti t t, wt', r j a \ � 1,f, ,ti , , ',,', ' •,'1r �,,e }4P .Z .a •y. r r.. Aq • "911 g Met parr on either one of this two sites. Street Wsg ar employees is prohibited . 22. t:9*1 stfoets affected by truck traffic shall be inspected ore after cohotruction. Any damage to local streets by * tf 1cM rbhll be repaired a reconstructed per City p row4tM at tho ***gnat of the r;0pl iasnt . }: $t o All dr eve b 11 be radius icype and constructed to public ' works stand*411. 24. There sbal,l be so entrance or exit of vehicles from the drilling aitie between the hours of 10100 PM and 7:00 AN eXaept Ior emergent r purposes . 25. ,eta owerlosd Vomit should be obtained from City sad State (if required) for all oversized loads to be moved on public streets . 26. Pkpe string com sting through fresh crater bearing sands shall bgl 1Msnted to prevent salt water Intrusion into the 27. A systoft for collecting, treating, and releasing stoma drainage shall be provided by the applicant and approved by public Works ,. 28 , brine water *hall not be released into the newer system. 29 , A recycling plan of produced none water back to the oil resit air shall be certified by the Department of Oil and Gas and the Fire Department and all its conditions and restrictions shall be adhered to. 30 . ►eMll service rigs shell be operated no more thin a total of 40 i tiep per year between 700 0 M and 7 :00 PM or daylight hours, *61chover is shorter. 31 . ft 00se 001e four well service rigs may lie on the preolse►s at any one thee. The service rigs shall not exceed 120 feet in height and shall be double muffled and utilise acoustical blankets as deemed necessary. 32. All drilling rigs asd production wells shall be operated by olectrical motors and eleettic pumps onllr. 33. The 24 -hour phase drilling rigs shall not operate for any longer than 2 years from the lssuance of the first drilling Permit . 34 . Drilling rigs for remaining wells after the two year period shall comply with the conditions . Subsequent dr111ing shall be limited to 7: 00 AM to iG: OD FM only. 35 . Drilling derricks shall not exceel 165 feet in overall height . (1613d) F.' Y , 'R I.; I 36 . upon COM letion of 24 hours phase of injection and producer F wallet all &Milling rigs $hall be retwved from the site. 37 . Bertvice gigs shall be erected only during maintenance a► ope�Cat�oAs . 38 . Appli.oant shall install blowout prevention squ�ipment. r, 34 . A full topor recovery system shall to installed as required by the South -Coast Air Quality Kanagement District . 40 . dAli► three on-bite crude oil tanks are permitted and ahsli never be completely full at once. 41, Prepare and submit a Preliminary Emergency Action Plan (PAP) prior to issuance of building permits . A completed Emergency Action Plan based on as-.built plans shall be completed and submitted prior to the start of tail production operations. The Aesgency Action pion shall include employee training and C:216dtc practice, how spillage onto street from sites) would t harAled (stockpile of sando etc. ) , the safe handling of *ny ab kale and/or materials* end full knowledge of all systems a rgency opIpment. A copy shall be on file twi th tine Fire De artmadt sad updated on a fire year basis. In addition' a Sp11 Prevention and Control and Countermeasures (SPCC) Plan in c'onpUence wltb City requirements for bandling of spills, etc. , act otherwise coy--red In the Zmargency Action Plan shall be completed and filed with the City prior to the start of oil production operations * 42 . All oil fast be transported by pipeline. 43 . An on-'site fire suppression system shall be installed as a primary source for fire protection pursuant to Fire Department A qui reont s . 44 . Caller requirolunts for oil wells : a . A roses sulfide detection system for the Well cellars s4r, be installed subject to Fire Department requirements . b Fire extietuisbers approved by the Fire Department Must be installed within 75 feet of travel on-site. c. Pwovido metal open grate covers over top of well callers . 45 . Btarage tank reRqui .ementn s a. Must have pro-plumbed foam infection system installed on all product storage tanks. b. Mot have exterior deluge water spray system on all storage tanks . ( 1613d) r i q 11, 1 JF TV . ,,, � i• !v'. f„ •r M f r i� a �t � +A11 Oh, F � ., 1 1 ♦• 4 Vy .•i v,. n „ 'Jr h,' r,r �" ,,�r� .,y i,-Y,1 , ,, IT ,1'.?' 1F j M •.!,1 i AP vE:r. ,r /•, ;fir yt �� l ny, , +ci•, !! r 4 • 4 46 . Into requirements a. All 61W aroas (suet hags an engineered Ornlns;o system. b. ,roam storage area and foltm quantity to be approved by Fire Depar'�aOt ��. C, •Piero h roatd to be located in ernis approved by Piro d. Hydr000n sulfide detection system approvers by Vire Department to be installed an project perimeter . e. Fiore e:tinquishaars approved by the bite Department emfst, be Installed throughout the site. f . All gets opeRningo Faust be 24 feet in width and installation must comply with Fire Department Specification 463 . 47 * *ell• collaris shall be maintained in a clean and efficient manner to prevent waste occezmulation . 48 . Twenty-one (21) abandoned wells have been identified withii. the PcoJe►ct area which der not most piese:ot Bay abandonment requirswnts. A contingency, plan shall be outlined and subai.tte# to the Huntington haecb Fire Department for review and op,proval with stbpn to be taken in the event that leakage from any of thosA abandoned wells findb its ray to the surface. 49 . Prior to terminetion of the oil op"ration, a plan ¢hall be submitted subject to review and approval . of the Vice Department and Comanity DeveloyirierL Derpartmeat, shoving how the site shall bit abandetrad .Lnd testorod to its clos6st natural state. 50. ThAro sh�:w.l be no pipeline conattuction activity outside the site oxcop.ti between the hours of ?:00 Airs and 8 :00 PK, Monday throuOh Saturday Only. 51. The sethodology of oil recovery for this p::ojtcst shall .to limited to water ifjection only.. Stearn injection shill be prohibited* 52. T'be - operstac shall at all times during the term of this use porwit' and way renewal or gntenaion theroogo maintain In force _ an insurance' policy or policies insurin4- then operator, and as additional ipsurids the City of Huntington Beach, the City Council and each umbel thereoff ant every officer and employee of this City acting in the dues course of bits employment or in his official carecity, against liability or f!nancla3 loss rtsultiaq from atsy wait& , claims or actions brought; by any person or Par- sans , and from all coste and expenses of litigation brought against, the insuradr, In the amount of not laug than $5,00O1OOO z-ombined single limit for any injury to ,persons or damage to properrty# in^hiding (but not limited toy (1673d) w injury or damage from subsidence and rubov,id, rE-.sultiacj from %:he operator ' s oil drilling and prc,duction activities and operations incidental thereto . Said policies shall, provide taut the, insurance coverago shall riot be cancelled or reduced by the insurance c,irrier without the City having been given at least tan days prior written r►otice thereof by such carrier . The operator shall. not cancel or reduco said insurance a coverage . At all times during the term of this use permit, and any renswal. or extension thereof, the operator shall maintain on file with the City Clerk a certificate or certificates rof ir.surancn issued by the carrier of carri-ars showing that said insurance is in effect in the emount required above, and a copy of each insurance policy , If the operator does nut keep said insurance in full force and effect, the City may obtain said insurance and pay th-, prenium therean , vhich shall than be deemed a debt cwr..ed by the nprarator to the City. Any insurance policies procured by the operator hereunder shall provide than the insurance carrier waivetr all rights of subrogation against the City. if the City obtains any po *Licy of insurance hereunder, such policy shall include a waiver by the insurance carrier of all rights of subrogation against the operator . E, 52 . The planning Commission shall review and, if necessary, may modify the conditions as set Forth in this use permit, at the first regular Planning Commission meeting in October, 1989 , end at five year intervals thereafter , and upon any change to ownership of the project which occurs between five-year ^erriews ; provided that the phrase: "change of ownership" as used herein shall not include any sale or other transfer to a corporation, partnership or other form of business organization in which Alberta Natural Gas-United Stetes and/or one or more of its shareholders or subsidiaries owns the controlling interests, or any sale or transfer so long as Angus or one of its subsidiaries retains responsibility for the operation of the project, 54 . The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke this use permit if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Ordinance Coale occurs . TL:e City shall provide the property owner with, notice in writing of any violation, stating the City' s basis for determining that a violation has occurred. The property owner shall have a reasonable time to M re the violation before further action is taken. The City may require the property owner with notice in writing to submit written documentation of actions taken to remedy any violation and may' requirs monitoring or other procedures to be implemented in order- to ene,:::e that the violation w.4. 11 be cured . 55. The nine mmber prof *ict review committee shall monitor Lhe project durino they drilling phase and semi--annually thereafter . The Fire Department and Community Dev ' opmont departments shall Jointly provide a staff Aiaison . ( 1613d) 56 . Tho prnperty value protection_ plan submitted by the applicant nhall be implemented as outlined prior to dri lliug . 57 . In the event that either one of the two bloc:kn is to he without 24--hoer supervision, a video camera shall be employed on--site to provide continuous surveillance which can be smoni tared by personnel at the other. site . 58 . All mitigation measures diver. in RSEIR 88-: and EIR 86-1 shall be i.ncludd as condiitionE of approval . I 59 . Emergency discharge through the City ' s :storm drain shall be approved the Regional Water Quality Control Board, I i i I I I i I I 1� � ,. 'rA CONCERNED CITIZE MS FO NTING ON BEACH ' ION tF a�N t9 A 1sulia Line Huntington Beach, CA 92648 C)ctoter, 26 , 1988 Honorable Mayor John Evskine C/O City Cleri;, Connie Brockway P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach , CA 92648 Dear Mayor Erskine: HE : Planning Commission Decisions on the Springfield Oil Recovery P rvject, October 18th Concerned Citizens For Huntington Beach, a non-profit corporation, wishes to appeal the followf ng decisiona : 3 C-4a To adopt and certify as adequate Supplemental Environmental impact Report No. 88-1 and EIR No. 86--1 by adopting Rpsolut:ion No. 140.2 with Statement of Overriding Considerations . C-4b - (1) Approve and recommend that the City Council Adopt Zone Change No. 88-11 . (21' Approve Use Permit No. 88-25 . Concerned Citizens are appealing for the following reasons: A . The accepted SEIR's are inadequate, for all reasons stated in our prior let tera and our consultants, The Chambers Group. B. The intensity of the oil operation is an industrial use that does not conform with the General Plan. C. Individua? citizen-Sot owners have every right to enforce their CQ R's recurded February 21 , 197+3 in Official Record of. drange County , G. The citizens are being subjected to the degradation or their residential neighborhoon by industrial, uses. E. The 57 or 60 conditions for oil drilling permits will never be entirely met or ontirely enforced as past experiences with the applicant, Angus Oil, hAs already proYed to us. We will appreciate your kind and Lair attentions to our appeal . Very Truly yours, , Na PR h, Ta easurer Abram! , Se tarn cc: John Murdock, Attorney CONCERNED CITIZENS FAR Joan Menteruic.•, CHAMBERS OMUF HUNTINOTON BEAC;l JA nieCITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH: E --b-V CITY COUNCIL. COMMUNICATION • • �11 a4 r c%"^p To Honorable Mayor, City Council FRomC:race c Members & Connie Brockway, City Clerk Councilwoman !U®JECT DATE APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION October 27, 1188 ACTION ON EIR 88-49 ZC 88-11 , AND UP 88--25 1 hereby request a public hearing before the City Council of the above applications. I challenge the Planning Commission's certificatiotl of E. 8,1-4, Zone Change No. 88-11, fi and Use Pormit No. 88-25 for the following reasons: The mitigation measures identified in the Erg✓ironmental Impact Deport and related conditions on the Use Permit do not offer the neighborhood adequate protection or address all of the concerns presented with an expanded industrial use project In an established residential neighborhood. l 548d GW:SS a s � r r C= 1 4 1 1 1 i DRAff C-4 i DWjlM"1' SUPW'Y4EhTAL ENV I ROIMNIA IMPACT REIVRL Sim 16 1-M *+_[ IQMENTAL IMPACT _UPQF.T .IQ_ 8 fi-1 frQR T)UZ J28QRQ= �IP�GFIELF. -- -. A. .T_J..'i C0N4_=T_1.QN_W1T}i_1= N9Z NQ, 68= APPLICANT: ANGUS PETROLEUM I DSEIR 88-1 was prepar"d to augment the analysis of the proposed Springfield Oil Rer..ovb,,:y Project undertaken in EIR 86-1 . EIR 86-1 was published and certified as a final EIR by the Planning Commission in September 1986 . Subsequent to the certification of Final EIR 86-1 and approval of Zone Change No . 86-4 and Use permit No . 86-7 ty the City Council on October 201 1986, litigation brought against the City air ANGLES Petroleum Corporation (As Real party in interest) by the Concerned Citizens of Huntington Brach, Inc . was settled by an agreement dated May 9 , 3.988 . As part of the Settlement Agreement , the City Council ' s vota of. October 20 , 1986 by which Final EIR 86-1 was certified , was set aside. On May 6, 1988 , new Project applications were filed with the City. Those applications are for Zone Change No . 88-11 and Use Permit No . 88--Z5 . DSEIR 8 8-1 and EAR 86-1, once certified and recertified respectively, are intended to be utilized for the aforementioned discretionary actions . STAY11 RE(:Q=JJpATI,.Q?J: Adopt and certify as ad&quate Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No . 88r-1 (DSEIR 88--1) and adopt and recertify Environmental Impact Report No . 86-1 (EIR 86-1) adopting attached Planning Commission Resolution No . 1407 with Statement of overriding Considerations . Commissioner Higgins stated he wnnld be abstaining a;e to a possible conflict of interest . C-4b ZONE CHARGE NO. 88-111Lfit APPLICANT: ANGUS PETROLEUM CORP. Zone Change No . S8-11 is a request to rezone Kock A (Tract 12747) and add the 081* suffix to allow the drilling of nay, oil wells. At present, loth Blocks A and H are currently zoned to allow existing oil operations . Black A requires the 001" suffi.x to permit new oil. wells* Use permit No. 88-25 is a request to establish a consolidated drill site and oil operation of both blocks . PC Minutes - 10/18/88 (1527d) r 1 to S. AZF CQ (u) Approved and recommend that the City Council adopt Zone r')ange No . 88-11 and (b) Approve Use Permit No . 88-25 bared on findings and conditions of approval . THE PUBLIC HFARING WAS OPENED (COMMNTS WERE. WAKEN ON BOTH ITEM C-4a AND ITEM C-4b) Spencer Sheldon, representing the applicant , spoke in support of the project . He explained the $1 million bond set aside was for the protection of the property owners ; if property was sold during drilling operations that resulted in a loss of value the owner would he reimbursed otxt Of the fund and if at they end of the drilling one--third would go to the City, one-third would go to the property owners and one-third would go to Angus . j John Carmichael, 5:772 Bolsa Av- nue, Vice President-Angus, spoke in support of the project . He stated there were 250 royalty interests that were also supportive . Jean Meliouf;,, Attirney representing Angus , spoke in support of the pro)act and the environmental impact report . She fusels the project furthers the policies of the general plan and the environmental impact report is very thorough. John Van Houten, acoustical engineer for project, said he has already complied with Condition #14 ( regarding noise) and has identified 9 control measures . John Westekmoier , Chambers Group (EIF consultants) , referred the Commission to a letter submitted by his firm outlining the inadequacies of the environmental impact report . He said it is highly flawed and needs to be revised and recircu+ated . His firm completed comments/responses and the City took the responses and :Wade rebuttals to them. George Corry, 1801 California Streat, spoke in opposition to the project. He said the CC&R ' g for the tract are not being adhered to and the property owner ' s rights are being taken away. Ha feels additional sethacks should be required and the 30 foot wall surrounding the project is not sesthatically compatible. tie feels the $1 million trust bond set up for protection of property values In uorthleas since .none of the property o"nera wish to move. Joyce gi,ddell, representing the Clamber of Commerce, feels the project is environmentally attractive and will. clears up the present oil ri as in financially beneficial , will provide employment and a model for the resolution of oil pro:,Aems its the downtown area. She urged thf� Couniscion to approve the project. I PC Minutes -- 10/18/88 -15- ( 1527d) i �I Ono Richard Abramson, 1804 Alsuna bane , urged the Commission to deny the project. He feels it in incompatible with the area and dries not comply w4 th the General Plan. pea feels all of the sites should be considered together rather tran separately. Jar Osborn, 203 Utica, feels the findings for approval arr.- misleading and urged the Commission to deny the project . Fie suggested the project be moved to the neighborhoods of tho, pec.ole in favor of the proposal . Roger Fain, 1908 California Street , feels the project should proceed because it will clean up the neighborhood . Robert Biddle, 171U pine Street , feels were gambling with people ' Q quality of life . He is not in favor of turning a residential neighborhood into an industrial area . He feels the project will create noise , traffic and safety problems . Von ariswoZct , 1906 c:Riifornia Street, spoke in support: of the project . He feels the consolidations should be considered one by I one since they can be shut down at anytime . Rdd Scbofield, 1101 Bennett Street, spoke 3n support of the project and fools Angus has been very cooperative with the homeowners . 1:ovin wi lliams, Carbe:c:k Drive, spoke 1 : support of the, project . He has ed near an o:.. 1 x ig 1.1 years and has no objection. Kathy Walker, 2730 Cherry Avenue* Long Beach, spoke in support of the project . William Trinkl, 1901 Delaware Street # spoken 161 support of the projeeot . He said his house (all outside windows) face the proposed project: . He requested Angus to take $600 from his share of the bond and install double paned glass in his bedroom. Nancy Hartmann, 1810 Huntington Street, spoke in opposition to the location of this project . She fools there are better areas. She suggested the project be located at: City Hall and urged denial . Denise devinesx , 1811 California Street, spoke in opposition to the project. She said she is a writer and works at; home and feels she will be severely impacted by the noise from the project . IKickeey Shafer, 1818 Delaware, said the site was originally an oil field when the homes were built and purchased and feels the current oil wells should be Gleaned up and is in favor of the Consolidation. PC minutes - 10/18/89 (1527d) Pamala A. Steele , 1713 California Street , president of Concerned Ci!ixena of Huntington Beach, spoke in opposition to the project . She said the project has turned into a war between the hrimeowilers and Aiigus Petroleum and suggested that the Commission pug dollar signs out of their minds and think onlA, 4,bout the people. She said the promises made by Angus Petroleum are not beneficial to the homeowners . She suggested they charge their name to "Anguish Petroleum'' . Petitions in opposition were submitted . R . J . Serra , 1717 California Street , spoke in opposition to the proposed project . He asked the Commissioners if they would like to have the project in their front yards for two years . He feels Angus is taking all o� the little problems and coiicc.ntrac i.ng it in one spot and then trying to control them. Wesley Abramson, 1713 California Street , said he was speaking for the " little people" ( the homeowners) • He said his home was his major investment and was concerned about the investment along with o the safety of his children . He does not feel. a $1 million bond is a •� suits . He urged� stuft_,.cient set-aside for probable law s it denial . Mary Parrish, 1919 Alsuna Lane, spoke in opposition to the project . Martha L . Block, Omnibus Environmental Services , 2134 Main Street , said she was hired to do an air quality analysis of the site and 1 found it to cor:.twin major air pollutants . Patricia West, 215 Wichita Avenue #204 , spoke in support of the � project . She feels the oil wells in the City neeJ consolidation . i Mandy Readman, 16000 'Villa Yorba Linda , spoke in support of the project . i Leo Shaffer, 1902 California Street , said Zingus is not a good neighbor and that the $1 million bond is not a big enough carrot to wave in front of the property owner ' s noses especially when Angus can cancel the bond at anytime . Lynn Mosemon, 1716 Delaware, stated her hor is 100 feet from the proposed project . She said nothing like this has ever been con3tructed in a residential area and that up to this point the City is unable to enforce code violations she wonders why they say they can enforce possible violations with this project . She does not feel the bond in auf Eicient , the project is wrong and urged the Commission to support the citizens of the City. Dean Albright, 17301 Breda Lang, asked if the existing oil line$ could hold the added pressure from this project . He said that a map in being prepared presently to show where all of the oil lines are because no one knows their locations . He feels this project is wrong for this particular site and that the City should protect its citizens . PC Minutes - 10/10/88 -17- ( 1527d) i 1 There were no other parsons present to speak for or against the project and the public hearing was clo.-ad . Cortmtisxioner Sourguigoon asked legal counsel if the ba::t1 could he cancelled . The Ci;y Attorney said if the project is cancelled the bond can ba cancelled . Commisssic hers that supported the request felt that a consolidation wad needed and that the proposed site needed cleaning up and that it would be an improvement for the City even though thLf did share the homeowner' s concerns . Commissioners that were opposed felt that the oil operation (an industri.el use) should not be located in a residential area, questic:-3d its conformance to the General Plan, felt the environmental impact report had too many holes and the land use was not compatible . A NOTION WAS MADE BY SLATES , SECOND BY SILVA, TO ADOPT AND CERTIFY AS ADEQUATE SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 88-1 AND ADOPT AND RECERTIFY ENVIRONMENTAL I.VACT REPORT NO . 86-w1 BY ADOPTING RESOLUTION RO. 1407 AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS , BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Mates, Silva , Leipzig, Bourguignon HOES: Ortega, Livengood ABSENT: Norte ABSTAIN : Higgins i rOB RAS INDISC-$t LrOR_ 'L •� HEIR 86-1 AND EI$. 86—IL 1 . DSEIR 88-1. and EIR 86-1 have been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act as amended June 1986 , and all State and :al quidelines therefore. 2 . DSEIR 88-1 and EIR 86-•1 adequahely addresses the potential environmental impacts that may be associated with the Springfield oil Recovery Project and is found to be certifiable . -.. - 1 1 . The economic and social benefits of the proposed Springfield oil Recovery Project outweigh the groject ' s unavoidable adverse j seismic, energy, aesthetic/view and cumulative air quality Impacts . PC Minutes - 10/15/88 ( 1.527d) L �S '�C ��I�E;F'i .. � :_.i►�1�lii, S?Ie' APj!RQYAL. - ,. A H-1 _AND _�.. �: .. 1 . The Site plan, elevations anti ].bndscape plan dated received October. 13 , 1988 , :hall be the conceptually e.pproved layout. . a . This use permit shall not become effeotive until done Change No . 88-11. hasp b-nen approved and in effect . MITIGATION MEASURES 2 THROUGH 8 ARF, CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR USE PERMIT NO . 38-25 . A MOTION WAS MADE BY SL.ATES, SECOND BY SILVA, To APPROVE ZONE CHANGE NO . 88-11 AND USE PERMlIT NO . 88-25 WITH YINDINGS A D COUDITIONS OF APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: j AYES: Slates, Silva , Leipzig, Bourguignon NOES: Livengoodi, Ortega ABSENT: Vane ABSTAIN : Higgins log UMMMI F TIMIRGE 1''O_RR AURQM - ZONE CHANT NO , 1. A change of zone from "'Oldtown Specific plan, district Two-O" (Gil Operations excluding Oil Drilling) to "Oldtown Specific #plan, District Two-•01" (Oil Operations including Uil Drilling) will be compatible with surrounding residential uses based on the mitigation measures described in the environmental im9aet report and conditions of approval outlined in the use permit. 2 . The proposed zone change In consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan. Unitization and consolidation of existing oil operations is encourzkged because it reduces the Aaind area used for oil facilities . Approximately 5 . 3 acres of developable land will became available after the consolidation on the two .t`locks (3 . 1 acres) . a« Section 9682 of Article 968 of the . Aty' s Zoning Code t provides for the establishment of "01" Districts . The { only limitation for such an 01 District is that of a minimum surface area (100 feet by 150 feet) , as required by faction 9682 . 1. The proposed drill site for the ptoject is considerably larger than the minimum dimensions required by Section 9632 . 1 . Therefore, it is consistent with this provision. I I i 9'C minutes - 10/18/88 -29- (15270) V ri . 3"ection 968.2 . 2 require n dedi,catJou , or an irrevocable, ofter of dedi.r:ation , of all real prope;:ty that '-he +,:ity may require for its straets and other public: se.vice facilities or improvements . All 0ty--required dedications � will be implemented through the terms of t ovo riled trr J.- maps for tf.i,k project site. Therefore, t-ho. project it. consistent with this provision . � c . The project will remove oil producing facilities from six sites, thereby permitting the restoration of oil sites scattered over 160 acres . Although! oil• producing facilities will remain on the project site , the appearance of the project site will be improved over its present condition. Therefore, the project is consistent with this policy. d . With respect to the Land Use Element , policies have, been tranalated into a Zoning and Land Use Element Consistency ' Matrix. The matrix shows that as a miscellaneous district • 01 may be comblried ( i .e . is consistent) with any land use category. It is specifically consistent with law, med! um and medium-high density residential categories . a . A General Plan Amendment is not required because the combined acraage of the proposed site is less than 20 acres as set forth in the Size Criteria for Determining Land Use Designations table contained in the General. Plan. � 3 . Compliance with Title 8 and Title 15 of the Huntington Beach municipal Code and the use permit conditions of approval will ensure that the proposed use allowed by the zone change will not be detrimental to the general health, welfare , and safety of the conununi.ty. 1 . The establishment, maintenance and operation of the oil operation will not be detrimental to the general welfare of perator,s residing or working in the vicinity, property and improvements in they vicinity of such use or building based on the conditions of approval and compliance with Title 8 and Title 15 of the Hun#-- ..gton Beach Municipal Code. 3 . The proposed oil operation in consistent with the goals and objeCtives of the Conerail Plan. oil activitiras are a ' coneiatent usd its any land use category of the General plan. 3 . The project will consolidate oil, operations in one location eadudlrig the visual Impact of numerous wells now spread throughout the Springfield ail yield area. SuCh consolid4ti0ft will alad be advantageous for bafeety and noise reduction putcposee * The project will result in the abandonment and recI matfon of 31 exinti.ng wells and 16 o:.l storage tanks in they Springfield Oil Field area and will not significantly increase traffic in that area . IBC Minutes - 10/18/88 -20- ( 1527d) I I arm 4 Supplemental. Envi.-eonmentai. Impact 'Report No . 88--1 and Environmental Impact Report No . 86--1 have determined that any rem3ining significant: effects on the enviroriment found to be ur-.avoidable are acceptable due to overriding considerations . 5 . Conditions of approval_ for Use permit No , 88-:18 Nava eliminated or substantially lessersed al ). significant effects on the environment where fepi�si,ble . 6 . Ths project will result in incraased tax revenues for the City of Hunti^.gton bzach -and ether governmental agencies . 7 . The conditions of approval are desirables and necessary in order to effectuate the purposes of the Huntington Beach K.-nicipal Code , the official General plan Lent] Use plan and the bast interests of the City. Further, they include mitigation measures set forth in the final )environmental Impact Report; that will assure the location is suitable for the type of use proposed and the following will not result or be reasonably anticipated from the project : I a. Damage or nuisance from noise, smoke, odor, dust or vibration; hazards from explosion, contamination or fire , b. Hazards occasioned by unasual volumes or character of traffic; incompatibil- ity with surrounding development . c. The project complies with all requirements of Division 9 except for the identified reduction of exterior sideyard setback and other applicable provisions of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code. i 8 . The condt Lions imposed include requirements of plans for t:Ye disposition of oil wells and fo7 oil oper�tiwris on the property involved, and for berma, walls and landscaping to provide max.mum feasible screeninj of equipment and facilities , 9 . Changes have been required and incorporated in the project to mitigate o-- avoid the significant adverse environmental affects of the project : a . The division of Oil and Gas enforces rules and regulations for the conduct of seconder}y recovery operations . b. The mitigation weasuces incorporated, proposed and adopted, together with application of the rules and regulations of the Division of Oil and Gas, will substantially mitigate all, of the adverse irnpects i identified. i i PC minutes — 10/18/88 4-21- (15274) I WNW c , Puhiic agencies other, tha;l the (.i ty, inc'ttdltii 7 th4l 1vision of 011 and Gas , Regional Wrat.rr Quality Corit; .rO" ijoard and South Coast Air Quality Management �: will be Keyiewai�ng aspect., of this project fr 2r r►d tAgaL"iLon measures as to ma�;'Zvrs yt!thi n their responsibi- lity arid jurisdic;t,Josi, including suhsurface operation, water aad o eir quality; the critical need fur gill renders infeasible the alternatives )f no project or delayed pr+ ject implementation, and alternati• e. surface locations are infeasible because of t'nni.r limited availability, or 4iir: greater disruption to the coirununity at large which wou".d result therefrom.. 10 . The subject: location is centrally located within till Springfield oil rield area ; relocating the prorosed project to another site is infeasible. I 11. No substantial public purpose t-rould be served by denial of Use Permit No. 68-25 but rather : a , It is important that the United States develop its existing oil reserves in aides: to most its energy needs without increasing dependence on foreign oil, and this project will result in incremental recovery of approximately nine (9 ) million barrels of oil; and b . The project will consolidate rail operations in one location, reducing the visual impact of numerous wells now spread throughout the Oldtown portion of the City; and c . Such consolidation will also be advantageous for safety and noise reeducation purposes; and d . The project will be only an interim use of: the surface site involved, and at the terminati.or o: the project the site will be available for recycling into other uses ; aril e . The project will benefit and accrue to the general welfare of the City and the public for each of the reasons Belt forth above. f . Approval of this project will reduce the immediate demand � for more off-shore drilling facilities , 12. The proposed oil c+onsolidetion project will hays 24 hour on-site personnel , and will be safer than the existing nor.-continuou& monitoring of the 31 scattered wells to be abandored throughout the area . This will reduce the possihle3 attraction of younger Versons , 1 13, The mWar modern, ef'fic3.ent energy-saving equipment available will be integrated into they design of the project which will � mitigate envi ran=nta l f mpae is ✓such us fire, noise and a i r pollutants. PC lKinut■s -+ 10/18/88 -22- (1527d) 14 . The applicant. hats oubmitted a property ti s .un pa:ob-c-tJr-I:i P1 an wh:ic!h will be ingl%�rnenter+ Ai 0ut1:1;,Ft'3 Pr. j.o", to drilling . 15 , The reductic, of the eite-A i or _,Jdeyi;rd se:.back^ from Lfin ( 10 ;; to ueven (7) feo:t is basod. :-)n the followi.nq a . The r.educt-lon of exterior side lard setback ,"or perim,�i:ei wall from ten '10) to .ev�,n (7) feet will ze sul.t to improved design and uti ,.i.ty WE the projent . b , The design of the j.�ear. imeteY wall will be compati`ile with the su r roundii.9 ne,i gbbo rhoaa. c�. 'Tho proposed perim«gter wall with reducsJ exterior sit.dcyrar.d setbacks will not have a detrimental. effect on the gEineral he& 7 _h, safety, iie,lfaree or setbach pxivacir of surrounding residents , dl. Variation in the wail. a W.-back is pa:eaviaead thycugh the use of offset landscape pockets , architectural features and building materials , I I, The altea plan, elevations and lindecape plan datsd received Octcbear 13 , 19GS , shall be the conceptually approve Ll lcyout . a . Thi u use permit. bhall not become effective until Zor.-: Change No . 88-1.1 has been approved and in effect. 2 . All structures and procedures shall conform to Titles 15 of the Huntington Bo ach Municipal Code and the Division of Oil and � Gas Standards , 1 3 . The applicant shall obtat.n all ne;:es%,tawy electrical and building permits . 4 . Noise fee ni '_oring *hall DO conducted under the supervision of an acoustical engineer cortifie (I by the County of Orengia . Reports shr 11 be submitted to then Director of CoMmuni�ty Dievelopm.en: within threes woirkinu oars Nfter they completion of es�;h 2haset+ of the monitoring esffe>iwt: . Thy shall Include the following : a• �.t X.i i?g.XhAS.§ tar! ag . pri,;-r to then start of the ' drilling phase. neiie rne:>r+asuremeents shall be obtcinad 9 during trios operation of they specific olrilling rig which has bean so ''e ct:eed and the messsureamea�nts shall be ralsteel to t�oa�0 which Will ire experienced at �.hee nearest resideenttal bdund*ri+ea to tilt drilling site. In addition;, the n^i.se e arstroa aaeasUres heave► keen (or wilt bee) applirBed to the rig � as roe cad for Co...9"Liance with the City of Huntington SeesCh i Noise Crdic.►me shall be idontifieed. PC minutes 10'0 18/88 -23- ( 15174) f *.Lift A k i r cmi!'i x if Is-hi I I h n obt., i n P'J ( 1.() - {'M Y10 "I : 00 AM> for at t" t"P -.4-j V.YI i n L:h a fivo I * JI: Hit! rit:-Orc !O: boundary Li 1 0 - t."F' "�1-1 1 , 1 1,o C,0[11 P;i V t",d t 0 t 110 S Fa P e C j.f i e d I t 1,o cl t ;'i,l.:-i c,11 14o, i ri(.1 0 z d i n a nce 1)y t h ...L ?a t . Whetz) an exceedance e!)i:i I.' i-ioise c-ontrol mea:iures lj. " ioltli Lwu niql'-L'i oL III()t-1 :;Boll be r co�q Lli 1: d ) A 14 i 5 0, mon I ituring shallocc-ut' PIL-T.ill LI-Arb.Q.- -1,�,-4 .- ));t 0twcQu the hotirs from 10 : 00 PM d i :71 �;�' lic--i�t�I. ' j?r,''one' 1C,, .% A. i-o at: ie(-I�--_t c! -�h month dn_, ing the drilling pnase of th- nrojout . T'he nois-r.. level. clatii obtained !tihdll be compared to t'he. C'Lty c�;: 14,iitiniitan Unach. Noise Ordin-ance 'c"Landird.,; by, #:Yte Dinpartmen'. of rommullity. Development. , WN_,re an ;�xceeda.nce of tho. st-andaxds is i dor t if ied, e no i sec: zo I rnr--' -,L LI She 1,-1 be applied and era additional two o[ monitoring shall, be required . 5 . Mca �,ures to reluce erc:,sion should be tused du:inq grading and si 'L,e preparation . Grading &nd corstruct.A'.on activity shall ti,ke rdlace only during daylight hours ifter the iSSLIWICe Of a gra6ing pccmi .- by the Depetrl.i.iexit of Public Works . 6 . During grading and excavation , earthmovinq crews should observe cuts and tipoils for potential archaeological fin-is . in the event: of a pot,',,.ntial find b,!Ang located , oparationc shrll be suspended Lil the signik-4cance of -`he find is 3 dete ."�"rmi."- d . 7 . A dust con'trol. Vrogram shall be submitted to the Department of Corw-unitil Developman` for revie�w and approval prior to the issuance of buildinq permits . a . All atcec !. improvements f-Dr both tracts shall be constructed atter the buy-y-gr. ding aperat'A' ons ha-ie been completed (approximatgly 4 weeks ) ; a . Final grading , or any other on-site construction shall be prohibited until street improvement construction he commenced. b. Prior to any an-site construction or drilling , the masonry wall and all landscaping and streat improvements shall be installed subject to the approval of Department of Community Dsvtlopmrnt and Department of Public Works . PC minutes - 10/18/88 -24- ( 15274) t' OW ,y?MkiF 9 . 1rj,it)r tc, the install;�ti.on of any land -icapinel , a landscava and irr.tga►tiau pli%n shall be subini.t:ted to they Department o1: Community' Development and Iaublic; Works for review and approval . laxidscapi 's-ig ;0101 ! comply with CIdpt:er .15 . 22 cat 1:11a f�ti►,rtt i r� �,i��� i.3 _.<i ^Y► t'r rci i.nanc.c; de and all t i-ees shi , 11 b�.3 MII), . r+,i w 24 :Vnc:h box typo and spaced no greater than 20 r-c'ot. on Center , 10 . ��, icar to +-h€� in.st.al. lat: ion of t;t;e ,�Ct �,r.e Wt-ructur�� , c. ?r�vaticsras :'-rtd11 he l�rov:,;ied For rev and approval by the Depar. t:riient: of. ��frill`•11`.'ll. t;�� �i?�'►ti�.fl�;Il�f'.ili: . a . The offir,�� shall bt-:. an is per,manesit t'oundation . I b. A rnansacd or pitched 3:colf shcyll be provided . i 11 . 1'hea a tali.cant enter: in"o a ;rarichws�a agreement with the City for the in;at,11DJLi011 Of the underground connection but.wee3n the two bloc hs , it renuir.ed . i 12 . "P proper r seali.ny and i�battct, .ime nt of the exist:inrj sc3t:tered which will be roulaced by this project shall take place y to -. Aowi.nq Lpproval of c:his project and must: be. completed f within eighteer, ( 18 ) morit:hs . 13 . The surf ace: of the site shall be complete ly covered with an rippropriate rricatc.riral. ( siach as gravel. and/or: tasphalt ) subject to review and approval. of Public: Works Depaj.t:riient , Fire Department and Del:a r. tment of Community Development . 3A . A report prepared by an acoustical erigcinee,r cent i.fied by the County of Crarnge shall bri submitted to the Department of Community Development: for review and approval prior to ►ommencirig drilling . Said report shall deWsczibe noise levels at the Angus Oil Site property line and at the nearest residential pt-operty line both with and witrhuut an acoustical blanket on the drilling rig and :service rigs , The report shall indicate noise attenuation measures necessary to ensure compliance with the Huntington 5each Noise Code . This shall include the provisions of the Ordinance Corte regarding maximum hourly average ea noise level at nearest residential property line of 50 dA(A) during nighttime hours between 10t00 PM and 7 : 00 AM. a . A double acoustical blankest encl.usure shall be provided at man-door entrances , 15 . Noise attenuation for the drilling operation, oil operation And service operation shall be provided pursuant to the Oil p p Coda and noise r.epert specified in Ccndition 14 . a . if a noise violation occurs , the entire drilling structure shall be wrapped with an acoustical blanket for yteF,' noise attenuation . , PC Minutes - 10/1A/88 r 16 . No Npeakers , loud bells or buzzars nhall ne nmrloyed on site , 3.7 excessive vibration, as determi.-ed by the Department- of c:,ortnullii:l' Dovelupmellt , 1511all , r: reduced to acceptable l.Fsvi�Is . Ia . bight and g au, shall bct directed and/or o Prevent' " spillage" onto adjacent ►- .sideritial propert:.es ,i. shall be energy efficient zubjert ;,u -the lcequ.J.retnents of t':h, tiIdinq Division . 3.9 . All ll heivy 'truck uraf fi�c shall he '.irni t cd to t ho fol loi ;ig street-7. I�f" t�wpi?n 1� r: 11 1'r t .L t ;,��•�t'!�� i�:P l� 1..71�.�.' k'l.t�) j :�i �: ' r E: 1 ,.� tiea%:j1 Snulevard, Adams Avenue , and Delaware Street . For entrance to the site only Springfield Avenue and California Street: may be used . 20 . Heavy 1. ruck tlaU-Aic shall be ].imlted to Lhe hours between 7 : 00 AM and 5 : 00 PM . a . No trucks may park on the s,:reeL . b. iruc.k deliveries shall be staggered sei that no stacl: .ing shall occ;iir on public street e, . I 21 . All employees must park on either one of the two sites . Street parking for- employees is prohibited . i Local streets afl (ictecl by truck traffic shalX ht: inspicted j before and after construction . Any damage to local streets by heavy trucks srsall be re3X)ai.red ci:id reoonstruc;t.ed per City requirements at the expense cF the api;.Llc.ant . 23 . All driveways whal l be rr� 'i.us type and constructed to "cubl.ic Works standards . 24 , There shad be nn er,trnnce or exit.: of vehicles from the drilling site between the hours of .10 : 00 i'K and 7 : 00 AM except for emergency purposes . 25 . An overload permit should he obtained frog City and State of required) for all oversized Toads to be moved on public streets . 26 . Pipe staring cementing through fresh :later hearing sands shall be implemented to prevent salt wa (-,r intrusion ini o the aquifers . 27 . A system for collecting ,, treating , and releasing storm drainage shall be provided by the applicant and approved by Public works . 28 . Brine grater shall not be released into the sewer system . y ..rM► M :PLFrI,+ 1 M 29 . A recycling plan of pi Auced. zone water ;)aOt to dis Oil reservoir, t:hall, bi., e.OrLified by the Depoltuent- o4 oil and GB and the Fire I)eparwt.-ment and -,j2s its condition.-i bird re:itriotidr:s shell lie adhered to . 30 . Wol. l servico rig: ►al. ;l Mc up no more !.hda a total of 48 days per `-# ar bets,,.en 7 ; 00 AM and 7 : 00 IN or layli#jtt hours . E whichever is shorter . 31 . Na more than four well servi.Qe wigs may be or. the premises at any one time , The surv-Al, rids shall aoll-- Exceed 120 feet in height and shall he dllut;l.f% l"m.1ff1r.sd -S.tcl ttt: i. Zi �. ¢ti�,�ta:ytx�al blaxii+.eis ct�;!, de mt--td necessary , 32 . All drilling rigs and production wells shall be rperated by electrical motors era only . 33 . The 24- hour phase drilling ::igs shall not operate for any longer than 2 years from the issuance of the first drilling permit . ` 34 , Drilling xig.-i for remaining wells aftez• the tw-) year eri•�d sha i l comply with the conditions . Subsequent, drilling shall � be limited to 7 : 00 AM to 10 : 00 PM only . 35 . Drilling derricks shall not exceed 165 feet in overall height . 36 . Upon completion of 2-4 hours phas►-, of injection and produce-c wells , all drilling rids shall he ~emovo-d tron the site . 37 . Service rigs shall, he erected inly during maintenance operations , 3F . Applicant shall install blowout pr even W ion equipment . . 39 . A Lull vapor recovery system shall be i.nst:al.lei as requi.ree, by- the South Coasc Air Quality Management District . 40 . Only three on-site crudes oil tanks are permitted and, shall never be completely full 4t once . 41 . Prepare and submit: a Preliminary Emergency A,-.tir)n plan (EAP! prior to issuance of building permits . A. completed Emergency Action plan based on as-built plans shall be completed and submitted prior to the start of owl production operations . The Emergency Action Plan shallinclude employee training and periodic practice, how spillage onto street from site(s) would bs hanOled (stockpile of sands, etc. ) , the safe handling of and chemicals and/or materials, and hull knowledge of all system.- and emergency equipment . A copy sba 1 l be or, file with the Fire Department and upd&ted on a five year basis . in addlLion, a Spill Prevention and Control and Countermeasure (SPICE) Plan in compliance with City roquiremnts for hindling of spills, atc. , not otherwise covered in the Emergency Action Plan shall be completed and filed with the City y prior to the start of oil production operations . PC Minutes - 10/19/88 -27- (15274) 42 . All oil must be transported by pipeline . 4.3 . An on-site fire suppre5sion System sha '!J be installed as primary source for tiro protection pursuant to Flye PePartMent requlzement5 . 44 . Cellar requireinerit.9 for oi ,,'. a . A hydi- oqen sulfide detaction system for the well cellers shall. be installed subject tc. Yire Department requirement;; . b , , 'ire extinguishers approved by the Fire Department must he 1,nstzzllad 1,qiLhin 7S LeaL Of trdVE-1 011--site . c . Provide metal open grate covers over top of well C.911ars . 45 . Storage t- dnk requirP.MeTItS : a . Must have pre--plumbed foam injection system installed on a-' I product storage tanks , b. Must have exterior deluge water spray system on all storage tanks . 46 . Site requirements ; a . All diked areas must have an engineered drainage system. b. Foam s�;oraqe area and U)am qiiantity to be approved by Fire Department . c . Fire hydrants to be located in areas approverl by Fire Department . d. Hydrogen sulfide detection system approved by Fire Department to be installed on project perimeter . ee Fire extinguishers appcoved by the Fire Department must be Installed throughout the. site. E . All Bete openings must be 24 feet in width and inmtallation must comply with Fire Department Specification 403 . 47 . Well cellars shall be mrintained in a cle4n and efft."ient manner to prevent waste accumulation . 40. Twenty-one (21) abandoned wells have been identified within the project area which do not meet present Llay abandonment require"nts . A contingency plan shall be outlined and submitted to the Huntington beach Fire Department for review and approval with steps to be taken in the event that leakage from any of Cdooe abandoned wells finds its way to the surface . rc wantom - ions/ss .028- (1521d) W "... .'K. 49 . Prior to terminittion of the oi I Operation, a plan uhall be Nubmitted subject to and apprava�. of the Fire Department and Cnrivnurli�,y Davelopmen ,,, Department , showing hOW the site shall be abandoned and restc.ired to its closest natural state , 50 . There shall, be no ripoline constrLICUOZI activj. ,.-y outside the isite except between the hours of 7 : 00 AM and 3 : 00 PM. , Monday, through Saturday only,, 51 . The methodology of oil recovery for this prajei.t shall be limited to water injoction only . Steam injection shall be prohibited . 52 . The, operator shall at all times during the term of this use permit and any renewal or citension thereof , maintain ir, force an insurance policy or policies insuring the operator , and as additional insureds the City of Huntington Beach, the City Council and each member thereof , and every officer and employee of the City acting In the due course of his employment or in his official capacity, against liability or financial loss resulting from any suits , claims or actions brought by any person or per- sons , and from all cost!.: and expenses of litigation brought aga;.nst. the insureds , in the. amount of not. less than $3 , 000,. 000 combined single limit for any injury to persons or damage to property, including (but not limited to) injury or damage from subsidence and rebound, resulting from the opeiator ' s oil drilling and production activities and operations incidental. thereto . Said policies shall provide that the irsurance coverage shall not be cancelled or reduced by the insurance carrier without the City having been given at least ten days prior written not ice thereof by such carrier . The operator shall not cancel or reduce said insurance coverage. At all times during the term of this use: permit , and any renewal or extension thereof , the operator shall maintain on f,-',Ie with the City Clerk a certificate or certificates of insurance issued by the carrier or, carriers showing that said insurance is in of act in the amount required above , and a copy of each insurance policy. If the operator does not keep said insurance in full force and effect , the City may cbtain said insurance and pay the premium thereon, which shall then be deemed a debt owned by the operator to the City. Any insurance policies procured by the operator hereunder shall pruvide tkiat the insurance carrier waives all rights of subrogation against the City . If the City obtains any policy of insurance hereunder, such policy shall inclmde a waiver by the insurance carrier of all rights of subrogation against the operator . PC Kinutes -- 10/18/88 F"29- (1527d) 53 . The Planning Commission shall review and , its rIecessary , may mod,;.f y the conditions P.s set forth h in this use: permit , at thEl li-st regular: Plannin�i Commission meetiuy in actobek- 1989 , and at: ,give year int;;rvals thereafter , and upon any change in ownership of tho which occurs bettn>t,.gin five—yy� ar reviews , provided that t ho- phrase. "change of ownership" as used herein shall riot include any gale or other t? anst.er to a corporation, pat:t:ner5hip or other form of business -jr(Janizat: ion in which Alber. t:i Natniral Gas--United States and/ox, ,)ne or more its. shA ehc; l.ders or subs irli ��r-es awns the controlling i. iLerest:s , or any sair- or trap)f-Pr.• so long as Angus or one of: its ►subsidiarles rei:,rins responsibility for the operation of t:'te pruier,-L . 54 . The Planning Commission receives the right: to revoke this use permit if any violation .-)f these c;ondit:ions or the Huntington Beach ordinance. Code occurs . The City shaJ 1 provide the property owner with notice in writing of any violation, stacing the City ' s basis for determining that; a violation has occurred . The property owner shall have a reasonable time to cure the violation before i:urLher action is taken , Tho City � may require the property owner with notice. in writing to submit: written documentation of actions taken to re.rueuy any - iolat: ion and may require monitoring or othar procedures to be implemented in order to ensure that the violettion will be � cured . 55 . The nine member project, review committee shall monitor the project during the dri ' ling phase arr3 semi-annually thexeaf:t.er . The ir.e 'oepartment and Comrnunity Developrtl+�nt departments shall jointly provide a staff liaison . 56 , The property va l.u,� protection plan submitted by the applicant shall be implemented ar, outlined prior to drilling . 57 . In the event that either une of the two blocks is to be wit:hotit 24-hour supervision, a video camera shall be employed on--site to provide continuous surveillance tiahich can be monitored by personral. at the other site . 58 . All mitigation measures given in DSEIR 88-- 1 and EIR 86--1 shall be includd as conditions of approval . 59 . Emergency discharge through the city' s storm drain shall be i approved by the Regional Water Quality Control Board . I K minutes - 10/18/88 _30- ( 1527d) .. . ..-,;,.:w• w.,:. ,s.�e.�u„wW,ra:r�,�wrrm�a�■.�rrd 0 W elub I ish NOV . 10P 19 INT It U_ Appeal to Pltinnin,g Curmii., ssion ' s hpproval nf Zone Chanqe W) . 88-1.1/Use. Permit No . F%ipp) #mental Fr-.6ronmental Report No . 88-1. and !:-:nvironmental 'ImI)ac'- keport 86-1 fSprirlgiir'-11.1-1 Oil Pec:.--.-ary Project) NOTICE IS 111U.P.EBY 01VEN that th}� 11unt ington D �a ,h C' ty Council will a. AiamUcr at the IiLly..t.-11,;torl Berich hold a public hearinc., in the Counci 270 !) HunI-J.nut-on Rr -c!i , California , on the date and at tha L.,_ine In6i.cz!te4d below to recei-;« and consicinT. the statements of all perscns who vT,L::h to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE : Monday , November 21 , 1988 TIKE4 7 : 00 PN Appeal to Planning Commission I s Apprnval c Zon8 Change tic . 33--11/Use Permit No . 88-2.5/Supplemental Environnient-al Impact Report No . 88-1 and Environmental Impact Re-port No . 86-1 JCMT: Anqixs 11i Corporation 1 . CounCilwontan Gracc,,, Winchell 2 , Concernr-d Citizens For. Huntington beacl', The project site consists of two blocks located on opposite corners as follows ( See attached map) : ract. '274)- : bounded by Springfield A,.. ---,,nue, Delaware Street , Rochester Avenue and California Street ; and DIDg.k .D_ Jragt bounded by Toronto Avenue , California Street , Springfield Avenue and Huntington Street . FiIi;ONSAL: rezone Block A (Tract 12747) from "Oldtown Specific Plan--DiStTict Two-Oil Facilities (OT-2-0) " to "Oldtown Specific Plan-District rwo --Oil Facilities with Vil Drillinq (OT-2-01) " to allow the drilling of new oil wells . Use Perri : To develop an oil consolidation drillsite on Block A and associated oil facility on Block B. Also requested is a reduction of exterior sideyard setbacks froin ten ( 10) feet to a minimum seven (7) feet for the north and south el,2vations of both blocks . ( 1150d-13) - - -- -- ---------------- NOTTCE OF PUBLIC HEARING (C(7NT. ) On 0-, tober 18 , 198a i,jazillil-Ig '%)jrujjjj c'j,-)jj approved and i�ecommendad adopf" or; of Von,- Charge No , 88-111 ap rcvf,-,(J 1)se Permit No . and approved ond certificatj (itj c)t Supplemental EIIVIV01117'ental lnipi�-clt Ilepoi. %*t No . 88 1 and Enviroomenital IMpOct Report No . 86- 1 with a o (" Considerations The Clit Council require(".1 to certify as ReperL No . 88-1 and recert'Ji.f', Environmental Impact Report L d6-1 with a Statomerit of Overriding Considerations prior to any action (,,,n 'bone Change No . 88-11. and Use Verniit No . 88 -25 . A copy of the. proposed request is on file in -the Departmont of Comniunity Development , 2000 Main Street , Huntington Beach, California 92.648 , for inspection by the public . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to aLtend said hearing and expi-ess opinions or submit. evidence for or against the application as outlined above . All, applications , e-,.:hibits , and descriptions of this propos;.j axe on file with the Offiva of the ('.'-Lty Clerk , 2000 Main Street , Huntington Beach, California , for inspection by the public . HUNTINGTON REACH CITY COUNCIL BY: Connie Brockway City Clerk Phone ( 714) 536-5227 Dated Nov . 81 1988 ( 1150d-14) * i r• RZ 0 !t IF4' jl CF-C I! ! I CF-E-CDR , . _�,,.., �f, � �z-o-clQ �t CF 16 C } /o ` ��� t-�-sic R2-I i ;�2 ii RZ 114 A -F-T9 WWI QLw S to IMZ��-�L1._-.1` S 1Ir7 Ili CF R RI FA lAl AI aI R -n ` • _I :L R, l tl I s SPc: 1. .- -� tll-Q fi``� �• r-` 1� � f:=` -7!{I-Q 1f-,i +-r,l F�3=^ I A 3Lil - R-) R 1 A 1 7rZ i I ' =Yri ' • �!!7:s f -� cz III RI AI R I i x-pCC • �1 1 �I, FF` 0 I ! I == �1�- /y i {Crg-MCT 4• S !i III �RI I' 't - Rf IR ctFoal � ��a -�-•••-_�, -__ 'r I I -0 zca" Vupclpu JzS/FlR"ajump --fw-_l HUNTINGTON REACH FIANNImG 01VISION NOTICE TO: THE. PLAUNING DEPARTMENT FROM: THE OFFICE OF THE CITY Cl_ RK THE Ar, LISTS 1:7RON THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOk NOTIFICATION 14AILINGS BY THE CITY CLERK 1410111' BE THELATEST 6VAILABLF. III ACCORDANCE WITH DIVISION ***Pt EASE REMEMBER THAT THE LIST MY HAVL Cl-ANGE-D SINCE THE MAILING FOR THE PLANNIM' M4,11ISSION NFETING WAS SENT, DATE sluRE V 1 E OF I WIFYIR i i rr Nov ► µ �'��� �AIR�Jd�..f� /•.. �,���dr�1♦ " �/�••%Cr'4..ir'�'�L�,.I�' /--3a'(rr//�7" � .��1_A.`s _ ZA4oe 3; 4> AFL W5.S PABWJ+F.,A. 7' 7�+�%:r r 'y' 1 r�'r C.C�I.�• c=%L 1 'ry,E 7i� ; A/a 14 '... f r Cyr= v mar, .SuPJ fir' —7A•ACPr-7 �•tl '�$�� 3' U/t:,. -�f, �:ra� .�C•Ii�.+✓�� -.�.�.t` �IIk�R+c. I—r"�w ,�.4i 7 "�C� „�r� aC'1'S'/��!` p"/�gt� //�' •+ -'frt•�i_r��.�; r .� Li�C' .�•ro�V,�;�d�y, G'LDO fit .1/1 C OA,-:r5�.V4Z) I , iAd wCLYAr,:7', 1 4 f 9�0y19 ,�*�,• 864 N. lur�r t�fr�fve l� �4npelm, California �W .AA GF XW7..e. tip 7#111 OV Y/" 71 do If Atj le .0.0 '00p, el, M1 1� 4'1 � t g ngton a e Fekrgy ��, ' li Report I ,I I� Presemkig SAccess to Underground 0111 Reserves in Developed Areas i Y r � a ,Y City o ��r �i1�t�t ���i DOP OI L � Of Devekpmv. nt Serwkms �� D*ion cS; M 44 OT� OF BEACH MY COUNCIL �I 1 yl � 1� V • Is tY ,F 1 ' Rmih S., Boilty, Mmyor Ruth F%ky, Muycw ho-`r`em Jack KcHy Dom MmAujorr Mob h; sea raturam IL BMW y d �r ilf VAI _ �s •1 '•f�N1iA'I.��, y HANTINGYMMACH SOY S FUES RIEPORT 01 PRESERVING SURFACE ACCESS TO L&DERCROUN i JAL RESEF WES IN DEVEWiM AREA MY Or 4" TON BEACH JAM► W, PaALJ% a CtCJR 1 FEWWARY162"1 I" i Talmo of Contents PAGE rcKwAka 1 OWNWONSi 2 1.0 INTRCK) JCTION i4 2.0 COASTAL ZONE MANAC.EMINT AND ACCESS TO OIL RESERVES 7 ` 3*0 UN171ZATION, W AI L IRFLOCOS, AND THE ACCESS PROBLEM 9 3.I (Primwyl Saeondary and Enhowed 00 Recovery Technology 10 3.2 Difficulties in Achieving Unit Operations 11 3,3 winiirtary Uwritizationt Difficulties In Assigning Costs and Beralits 12 3.4 Compulsory Unitization it" 3.5 it 'sntage of Unitization 15 i 4.0 ROLES FOR CITY GOVERNMENTS 24 PROTECTINQ ACCESS 17 TO UNDF. Gi' ,CKJ 0 OIL,. POOLS 5.0 TOWhL07►1C3OWNTOWN ANAL'•.'aIS 19 5.1 grief History 19 5.7 Remaining, Recoverable Oil 22 5.3 The Possibility of a Uniti4ation and I :nherwed Renovory Pro jec t 27 5.4 Surf a". Area Requ irr.ments 30 6+0 POLICY Off`"TiONS FOR THE CITY 36 6.1 k"xisting t_and U%e Regulations 37 � 6.2 Strategies to P*lp Preserve Existing Drill Sites 37 &3 Strategies to h*Ip Preserve Other Oil Operation Sites 39 6� Permitting (kw Wells in thr, Tewinlot Area 39 i+5 New Oil Sites 40 6.6 Other P Bible Actions 42 CCIVCLUSICIN 43 11A NOTES p4 APPV4=ES 43 Append ix At Questiar►ae ire vend Covert Letter 45 Appreml ix 0s Bib ilogtophy 48 r, A' 1, •A &y%u rt kti c►sias�,1r� 10-06 r I Foreword ord i ' him is Ow first M a srriea of +1isewalorr Won an +orgy-related issues prepared by the 1" Mblen of ft City of FkmZingtan Bosch. Wur►tir�citorr Basch !� a center for wrOl arMj ICI rtad wCt vitro irrcluditeg =whore W-d offshore ad production,, an •I+ ie lt�► tMrg pwor plent, wd Increasingly, voIrr and conservation (technologies. 4 'o pwpm of OMm IgwU is to help the Clt+y to aztommodate the continued oroduction of M vilttl a Mmouroe as VWgy whDot at the rsnx: tirne mitigating as nwch an possible any a0wWo kr4W s on do Comm mity that such +activities might incur. Curer reports in w.h0k am%$ irreluds tte faltowlrq: /3 Fiscal lets of Oil C*errthons in t-1 intingUin 1ksch 03 Oil Spill Contingeovy Planning In F-Iunklrgtw Beedi 04 Fnitemed 00 Recovery Technology 19 Snlw and Convervetion Policies at the Loral Level i This Publication was preparred with finrrreial assistance from the U.5. Offirc of Ctror 1 2o* MaraWnwrtl, Nsti*wl Cc.rsnic aril Atmmphmic Administration, esulrT the +br1tblons of ow F derel Cosatal Zav fftwgetnent Act of IS72, as emended, and (mm 00 Crtlfars Coastal Carnrniseion ander thee P rovWww of the Ca stal Act of 1976. • 1 i i I . x,� i .i�kd'�, HA' 1 M This repart rreciRsearily discusses some technical sspwtr of Ow oil Industry. �rttiy, somw term am used which ► ay riot be famill r to ttvi reader. The follow"L dsfinklons action was prepared to help clarify the rr�eanirg of rwrne of than Wirt& save reforence, ali worms defined in this section are Italicized the first time they appear in the mpart's text. ticktion: IV practice of to m-ent:atintp oft facilities into relatively small, veely-Mod Woof aawv Scommigg o mmis: Lou-or awage ooats or pwater aver000 proffu reaulting from a ayQer UWnew entity rather thm a smalisr arw undertaking a purtictsla- function. d. rem aechno�: bet its begat aortae, any method whieft is used to recover Warm a ut a from Pe eum rossrmtr than would be obtained by primary methoft aamotimea used to mean tertiary recovery only. Free-rider: Situation to which aye panty pains from the of/'orts of another party, an' t contra ng to those senora. Lea ectorj: Wfilis through which prrea&rized water, steam: or other fludda are &iven or wMj*ctiW inta en oil P-mervoir. Joint ar�ainization: A cooperatie;e group formed by several Oa operators u or•kfng a common rss wwf for ttw purpon of investigating the f easibillty of Forming a unit. Partici tion arrnLda: An agreement among oil oprrours who have formed a unit new ng t�artiara of sgvwes wW profits of the unit each operator will be allcented. , Primer roductton: OR ahi`*r% up V rough weUs by natural pressure IrE the formation or by pumping units, without fnjectirV water or other f aids to Mlp form, the gag to the Arrf ace. PreNlicers: WePs nand to pump out oii from a reservoir. fit U : kt this context, ref art to the redevelopment of the surface area of an oil ftold for Una such as houst"o or commerce. etsan: OQ extrac 4.:d of ter primary prociuctian usuaily by irjoeting 0as or wdgerr go nrWvr►ir. Technical committee: A committee establishod by a Jbint organisation of oil operator's Vr oP tot armdt?cn of O 151it which i; Foapartsibie f or inv�tstig AtIftV vawfablers such as the pwlegy of the oti reseraoirt dtaraetoristics of Ow oa Ow best patential recovery urols1krues. Tar'tidr.z med oft- On mcovory mothWe arpprted after secondary production which wuatly Aftwow UN e+e air of elr Micatil with water into ttrr resiorvwr to help pk&rh out more all Own water Mate em. it some ems, Owse methotbr are opened after pr:emery prodictian. 9_ y. n. t �- dONM , s 46 flo ty/aged UY agar+ W adVfanirtt 00 a►mpmfoo %fdah we* a oamotan as pool Is V mart and M&Wvl sntawsW to pndam ft rawya& ca a e # r. 1M11r� Ww"M In a peat agar fkomantood, wdto ant nttal for um Of MOdt � � roopvs7 mfOmW which am arty bi dptiad an a ,mt*4 poW-wide VO PONA of f M kW a M t. .A ormdwy mcamory pvVvm thrwdh utdch pnosarlsed Beater is tnjocted ba a do to paah More W fwn tiro jxwem in the ram. a MOM t)'rrtr hm for "wateepaad:v no tome &mod tnam Ow "foell into The to' the prpwe ovompo "NOWWO l" the pool a war favactlro matsfoh out of tt10 r1w ng* 3rem Satoh cmtoin on. t x •i�+,,: ". , , ----.yam 1'r 1 .¢ • . r 1 I I � Y , f I i 00 The City of It tirgton Beech overlies an production raters. ThuN many peerts of the old and very productive oil field which, field are recycling to new ueaai especially to alnee Its diercov&I In 192(C hoe produced houaing., almost a billion barmler of oil. Although the field Onswd Its productive peak dec:eocWs in moat cases, however, the recoverable oil all, It still producad emigh oil during 1979 in the undergrounv reservoir has not been to tank raventh among oil Califon. Is oil exhausted when the surface area is fields in •rnAl output. Oieer 1,OOU wells developed. . For oxamplee, primary are still active in the field and Sion, simply pumping as much oil as awrrcx1mately 472 eerres of the City are possible without Injecting water or other used for oil operretlor* sr, Aances to help force It out, typically exti erctr only 15 to 21 percent of the oil In Ir rr several yew* ins•,mverr, the o wunt of place. Consequently, when an oU field in Irirrei devoted to all extraction In Huntington whim only primary produetion technkoos -leer try dP6* & The rsims for this on have been utilized recycles to now uwes, the 0166 In ti vv pat-to of the oil field where gnat majority of the rail usually rarminrr in 1~ rx cat *; gthWWW `y tie ground. he" not bmm &Wllod, Irwsh fate dropped rulsting and welt-known #M*ly« +Olt Um safe thew# the value WO&WOM Whnlqum% such as water Outfzoo was for MW uses injection, can recover on additimal aQ to 30 for haaet V tore in coorriwl, pwcent of they all. to addition. several row "l i r+n G'alifnanla has Fben technologies, vV thsdsr are err 1 the 01I field developed slid tested to extract tFin 0 b sewer profitable then mrsoinkV after necerrrdery pnxWtlon. ,� om exwoetion at very loser V i i i tertiary methods as wall Figure 1.1 When the interests In an all pool are highly fragmented, howevart this rwrmtous parties y `\ muit act on o unit before th.asc advanced Secondary `* Ochnolog!es can be applied. The operators tencountat several difficulties In formi:iq a cOordlk*tsd ''unit," and often cannot act ertiihy� together to apply these more a ffiele nt » production methods. Pr k These difficulties are discumed later In this report. However, if these prolilcrrns are overcomep irnitttutlan ran he achieved and AsNalnlrtq 010 - enhanced recovery methods applied to Aeco"Y-j by Futm provide lrirge arnoi,nts of oil. Tochnologyt ail may not L)e rarovered (even if ..nitization bacn:oes economically feasible) if there are no surface areas from which extraction can be accomplished. It is precisely those areas where secondary rtietho& are not currently used that Percentage of Ou in the Ground production hess declined ac much that Which Is Usually tRecoverod by abandonment of the field for redevelopmentDifferent Extraction Methods, is more profitable then continued ail extraction. Thus, the parts of the field Source: petrbie�u: which are most likely to be developed for Jnwery. �- residenti9i or commercial uses and to lose future access from the surfarr. are also, the ones where secondary methods have not been tried and where their application could putentially produce large am unts of oil in Several of these methods or: being tried in the future. ports of the Huntington Beach field. Mmeetic oil supplies are an increasingly SeowWwy acrid "met tertiary toOniques scarce and valuable resource. Their value oOnnat be +applied on an Individual well derives not only from their economic worth baaie. Flulds� such as water at water but from other, lent-tangible, benefits greeted witli chemicals, am forerd through related to that decreased rellanc+e an foreign swrV6701 wells ( Wtd"X sweepirg thw oil rvureee. Theta benefits teach beyond red*M aU out of the pore spacers oral then the local community and have a rogionl and ID @*vote) other wells ( r►VS) which even a nationai invortsnce. The pump the oil to the surface. The. injectors groater-then local Importance of earrrestic and prodweers are typically arr:vsgeed In all would argue that the preservation of pettom so that the Injectod fluids can significant oil prods`-etion cpportunitles etfficlahtly avreep though an oil pool. Thuh ohould be tree concern of ft State or the *41ve oil paobt must be treeted as a whoie federal goveernrmnt, and noE primarily of nt a unit and the trwth&M trrutt be eppiied the: City. Ina coartlbuteed wary. UDcal governnnowto, however, traditimally Whan the ae rim pool is owned by a aide have control over IwW use, It is the City c:+orri inyr use of there methods is relatively width met control surface sztivities It land a", in fwtr the nfalar operators In for future oll extraction needs to be Hmtington Seeds -- Arrrinoil, USA and protected. Thee local goverrim mt also C#Wvreerrr USA --. have been erot#rr1wdbV "ran the re6ponsibility of protecting true Unit parts of the field for over two interests of Rive proseent and future dftsdo4 and both to, anlee are Resting commrnity wrroundinq an Operations. . ;' _ r r r R ► Y C-ome"ntly, another mason for City continuation of a very valuable revenue Involvement in this issue Is to ensure that source In the community. The purpose of my adverse irnpaats an nearby uses from this report is to discuss the protection at futlJm all operstlam are reduced to access to oU resources so an Important MOSO Ala levwlL Om. other consideration consideratiun for lwal land see poflclOL It flag, Us City must we ilgh in assessing the discusms the nutnsrous variables on which ear lour Is that Mi production generates weess prorervation can be based, "gists a %hota rtlel tax rever uea to the local range of protection strategies, and analyzes govsrnnmant. Protecting access and the specific areas in Hrmtington Beach wheros Optim) to apply future extraction they could be applied. to i(Vies may be crucial for the 3 ,h y '•4' 6 :( i flu. 1 7 •+m I 1 10 Coastal Zone Mwag-M—Ift-an't wW f rjj iT I r,r 1, 1• 7. I Aomw to 01 "Od or s V* California Coeatrsl Act of 1976 culls for Among the considerations relevant to VW Me protection of the natural reawrees of long-term utilization of these coastal Ctalifornia% coastal cone. Among the goals resourues i:i the need to protect surface, of Us Act is tos *tees to t;n oil reserves. The area o! tits: City where tt* most significant deposits ItAMw a orderly, bt,lwwW utilization end still in primary production are fond, send OWWWntion of clostal xnns "MurcVS whew fut.Ure ocean is most jeopardited, is ttokirg Inc* account the akini ecoMmic the Townlot/Dow(ntown area, which is mods of the people cf the Kate. partially in tht ooastisl Zorm. (See 6igure 2.1) Tthe City tei: g Ited this issue in the aftroOdy taw awd Significant natural Land Uft Plan of Its L P, which+ k cludes momwees in or d mar the Huntington Beech policies to amend the n nicipsi cafto if tl!l�loftl ewe iinchtdb the lwq-produ~tiva neconatryo to help ensure that h awface r lbt of oil. In at coedero with the access is raserved, if It is a wrrtial to tin a� ft Cassstol Aotr US Cky Is fut#uto drvtelopmant of significant all `-' rwlth ON tt OWly utiliastion of resoum-es* Thite report is interWad to Woo ° �t& Ths Cltyto Local Coastal the City analyze tares issues, as a stop , (LM pa tt, C on trrfEnkq its pa5cles arrd artiieta waa tlw Ag&bftlo GIs of ttw abned at rrarurkV the offich t WN-term wh110 ► PPMMWq tither ust of these important e+att>IMtel reuximes. rowkw" such oft the OW v"I ~Rim of the LIMMIMM .7 r rb rA UY I�r�,,, '•:il'xr YY:C.' .w•1..17 Y L"Yir ..L., _j �- -- '-` - -_ - _ - =+' 3' '_t�s- i s x Coastal ?one Baranftry [D M Tj IE Til 'Ll® [D[Fi MMLTUIL muj IEH 4q �im P44Qq P; Figm 2-1 Taw dctjD*wgtOwrh Huntington Bear . - Saurccl Hintington Beach Planning Division. ' — uF l 1 • t 1 M �. 1 L 1 NVAV AM � �� iw wo . �9"w �'0 ��!•E�t`�¢ �-� � > _ •� ; ��� RX'-� .t�w� w..-k+ fad+,�w►\ly aw �r �.'T. ''}.�'` ����, ri.. � , S.r•�Y>".! � Ryye � �y `' 4t to achleve Is very impotent, to an analysis Much rwre of the oll can oftvrl be recovered �f the access issue. if pre"urized water 6 Injected into the all " q 3.3, Primary, Secondary and "Enhanced" t'�irou h l. The water helps to rttove the o:l " pores Ire the: rock. In this oil ecaysrY eo no oqy techn;que, the pressurized water is ft cad Into 0o ree*rvnir through "Injector" w '„,is. The •i Mlest and rnosr common molhod of The water (mve.; out In all dir etione from extraetllrg oil Is to drill a well into the these wells, sweeping oil In front of !t. (see all-laden rock Goswily sandstone in this Figum M.) area) and pump as much of the all se possible. However, all Is a sticky, thick Other wells, called 'producing," *re substwxw which chi not flow very cagily arranged around the Injectors to pomp out through the por+rs between the groins of the oil and water. (See Figure 3.2.) sand In the rock. Of ten, moss then~ 80 percent of the original oil in plane lrennelm To effiLiently use the pressurized water, in the reservoir after this "primary," producing and injector wells are arranged in technique is accomplished. patternA which allow most of the ail putihad b�,. the water to to -,mrnped out. (See Figure 3.3.) F Igu re 3.2 Figures 3.3 0 a 0 a x X x X X crater xa inJosction well a pmduction we11 .• •Y:.. sir 1 .hi•til1�IT f `•Lx., _44 ._ ;�;"',;s • r1 '�•'��}",�' Example of Well pattern in �,. _• t t : M ��,' t.ri Wateeflood Program. Source: tail Welt Drlllin Techrplo�= ..ray are Pwasuri zed water fat she Cola# 1973. i"Jectioo we111 0 forces of 1 toward the Pr0duc1n9 wc11s 0 . Top view of Wetwflood. Thew pottsrns am not always reflected In the surface locations of the wells hecewe Sour"t Kmtl,�pton Beach Plowing wreUs can be drUied "directionally," tlsst b, at are �rrrgler, and It !r the location off the Dlvisiorz. bottomie of roo wells In the all pool itso:if which is so Impvrtent to the, rpplicatiorn of the,w tachrolQL-ss. An advantage of directional drilling Is that a few, centralized surface Pamela can s matImes w erect a a oa'rcegtmting facilities osecoer modate enany dimctioml.ly-drilled Into' *mile kwov Vely-uaer! "face aeons, it wells ttea4h which much lew{'jorr Z p "Uwe CgMliMM&L irWwground we&@ can be teop o& S, L C4$Wly, thhi method which is called "water program. In fact, an important reason wiry lojectlaff or "waterfloor',11 t:rrernnt be spnlied %si tizaltion is not tried In mare ,axes is that through a SirVie well. Rather, many wells ,,here is no large company with enough Of � SIM JIMMIved which roust he worked in a interest in the reservoir to warrant the oerardirreted way; the location and depth of costs and risks cf trying W four, a snit., the swell% the tion-Ing of the injecting and Small oil curnpanies usually do not have th4 ptod"UV phase*► the pressure applied at technic.*) or financial reeources do instigate different times and locations, and many a colt. o"r ver6abies must be planned together to gent the best use of the technique. They However, even when a large corporation has entire paoi roust be tr&ated as a whole, at as ;en internst in the pool, it mast oveercomt a "unit" — otherwise a significant part of severs*) barriers before ►nitizwe6on icon be Ow inv*strneent in *illing the w&h and achieved. !njoctlrrq wntser undar pressure may be lost becauaw much of the oil rfty be purrheed First of all, there in a significant incentive *7nut but rmt caller•ted. for any individual opr-.rwator rot to partieipato, In a unit while haying t4at his When a single correpsn� worttr< on *await, oU meyrc. VU(TlernUb neighbors instigate the pool, this type of producticn method I& przjesct onyway. In this sltur.-ion+, the other easily accomplished. When t-eve cal c4,:ratora In the field incur the cost of ,operators are purnpinq from the serne pnr.l, d?velnping tl a secondary terovery program, they nwet agree to work together sa a unit. whUe at the same t:irnee, if his wells are This, however, b often very difflowt. These fwavarobly loc:sterd, the hold-oast is able to difficulties will be dis ussed mono fully lr, recover some of the: oil swept by the unit's the Mxt Sectlom injection pattern. The hold-out does nrit share; in the costs of Implementing the Even rFr- "condery recovery, mute than, prc.+grarn, but he a wes in the increase u' • 30 percent of the all remains in the ground. pro�iue tiae•i• Often, so many operators ` New methods are being developed to refcrse to join s unit for this mason, that the recover some of this oil. Many of these program cannot be undertaken. 'his Involve injeectiny scbstrarwees into the oil pmdic3"w.,nt 3s often referred !.a as the atrnera *long with water; these substances freprfcmr p►ohilesm. twip push out more oil thar, water can ■lcro. Aqein, however, these techniques are Federal price controls on nil have often moat efficienti) applied an a ;: .-alckv bw.n cited ors inhibiting unitization, The basis.* These technologies &:-* often federal government has recently taken stepw► walled "tertiary production" whoa: tivsy to deregulate the price of all domestic follow in earlier water injeectivn program. production, so price: controls are no longer 0-lowevw, In art reservoir where water an Important considerstlexr in anaiy*ing a iniection No not occured, these terchnigims un!t% potential ptofits. ,,right be &Wileed sitoultaneously with or irrbteeed of wa simple wafrerfltn:d, to Increase Some parties may not be k tarestsd in the effielvicy of productlom joining a unit because thn tail o"rsti +ars, In fact, ownod by rirrns wivev principal 3,2 Difficulties In Achieving Unit totemst is In redeveloping Vv very valuable '1 rrrrs wasrfaces I*nd of a time when it is most profitwstrle. Sw.h firrm do oat went to A lar& all compoif whir:h Colds a commit their surface holdInIls to a "aWtIal ftraeticn of +ear oil pool wiii be the long-term unit agreement for ail pwrrty wl mt like+ly to try n oniti r rotie'n production. This problem m.wild ba overcome if thew operst-ors arrc willing to .: join an the basis of mineral right, but not oweevar. r 1l such technologies ware so surface *rep or equipment �-• provided OW 11" Sao Report 4 in this writs, enough wuriace land still rernalm to produce HEntterrc,d ail Recovery," for a fuller bee field eecomoinicslly. dieceuselon of thaws method+,. Y3 •I a Ao �• M' Anther potential problem Involves the that mid be recovered and the suitability liability if a unit for production decline of the revirvolr to secondary aamaerag sneer-participants. if arrraaigh home tho potential parothe alperatom are willing to participate that a that mid be roalIzed from a unitization unit waterflood is undertakean, the progrent—:cads saner of the parties holding raperat1wo could rmit in art aeon-particip-nt% an interest in the rtsarrvolr to pursue ae prowduation declining (sithou aften It voluntary unit agreement. lncraeoom aexplained above The unit nw than be Paeble for the lore in L* ally, a major "rotor holding a productlaam Court cases in Texas and substantial fraction ,if the interest in the Xmwas hevae absolved units of such IlaAbilityl reservoir contacts other ownership Interests howeever, sorno companlss hove cited the and Invites them to a meeting to explain Irldt that the unit might be held liable as a why a unit gyration and a flelalwrlde reason for not participating. recovery project may be desirable. Often, insny operators are not interested bacousatr This$ for all these ressonay it is difficult to they have no first-h and unitirstion gat all the parties that hold sn Interest In an experiencrr, or they do not have the all pool to join a Ur%It voluntarily, In light of technical background to assess the potential th1% and the faaavt that unitization and value of the prolpe.t. Many op►eromrs are aweless z4sd recovery is the most efficient sharply susplelous of the true Intentions of a method of extracting a very valuable major company, doubting that small firms resoea, ", my most states hava established will gag fair traestnwnt in the joint coampulaewy unitirstirn laws. These requite arrangement. Other resom why individual htai.d-outs to join a unit it a curtain operators might not express nvbn a pomantage of the total interest In m field is tentative interest In ttre project were willing to participate, This perc:entsge discussed above. vorles from 60 percent to 05 percent. (See Table 3.1.) In some cam*, however, several of the parties are tentatively Interested in a The compulsory unitization laws in common iteration sn+d they begun to work "If*rnia, however, are limited in their on a unitizationaaogreomrerrt. This is usually r. ' lleavtian and may not be relaewent to a very IWV, difficult and costly process. :4antirrgtas'1 Beach. 'Voluntary and T'ho fh6t stop �s the initiation of ar joint a wnpulsoryr Unitization emus 'the topics of INS ergantsat o n. maxi, sectform The joint organization usually establishes M Voluntary lhitization: Difficulties in sevew31 committees to research Information As�`sCosts gem 115 anaeeemery for developing the unit. The most important of those Is probably the tochnIccl Dasepite the rkks seared costs of trying to put a m mittso whose tests Is to determine the taagethe , a unit, rometirnes the amount of all geology of the reservoir and to reeommeM the beet rnacovwy technique to be appliae& This cormnitteae rurlyzes such facture so the TMS sour if the hold-outti well were areal extent of the oil torso, their depth sat eltm. to the unit's injectors that tt-e all in and thiadcrent faulting pattertns, existing than rma new his well is swept away by the tr► U-bm distribution, and surface woos pressurirnd woo-v. The result would be a available for new %;ila any equipmant. The larger Wwrenoe In the aaw~oo t of water committee then evaluates possible recovery i puny ed Own his veell, but not. in that meant methods. Historically, moat units were put of n1L togett*r to apply simple water i i 1� � a - i JIOP i IV IF - Areeeat of Worktaq Accent of worrki"q �:Pe:ca.e� iateFgat #"wired Interest M quIred Interest Required at"* Per Oo■palm v wit State for com alsorf Unit Sutfn for tdapulswy Unit �11a1�s 73 Leaisiaas 75 45 3titasia 62.3 'tlefse SS 63 { Jlri toga 63 Michigan 73 4rev= 75 drams 75 Wimm sri 75 South Dakota 75 C�sii�Oil4i� 7S "=tons Ad TNMSDM coloraao do Nebraska 75 mah 68 f2 rf�a 73 Saveda 6#.; West Virginia 73 Ili ais 73 New plazlec 75 WIVOLRO so • s 75 v w York 66 Aatsck3r 15 worth Dakota 60 i Qbrrent of Wm*" hferfmt Rime 1�r Cw" 1m1Ritalm MIS F=. AMA 1 1 Injeotim, 1 bwo top, future units may use Surface roes we llkewhe unequally valued enMWAwed Moovrrry tachrneior with the » soars locations are more critical thor wMarfiod to rwnvat more oil q-Acker, others. [Different operators will sine rates than rweiting to appi�r eu:�h contribute more keens, mote mineral rights, toc�hremgh s otter o M1rr�pie Injection rnaro storage her processing equipment or pro�t. The angoctle►s of date and the morn surface area than others. Pride In ova volon may tdke ysare, dAporiding an tho property ownership or in control over Its► rse!of tlo Valogy a whether the individual operations is another less torgir,le flout k U kndon at not. Thee corrnmil400% factor affecting the value are lndloldual trh�y eeaonhr.ret+riatiorts must ba brougM Were piece an his Interests in the reservoir. the full Joint ar�;anitetlarh for approw.t, ' Clearly, assigning costs and berhafl•s+ In a A legal awarrhittee reserarel lard and way that is considered fair by aU parties Is a Interest titles and royalty or reements and wry difficult process Involving long-term trier to determine if there are any legal nagotietiarrs. Uswlly, the greater the restrlet►ons or prablerm mEatsd to property number of parting the more difficult It Is to rights which could jeopardize the unit reach an acceptable agreement project. This committee In also responsible for working with the Division of 00 and Once a participation formula is arrived at, Go% the Statue regulatory agency, to ensure unit agreements are drawn up for the that the proposed unit sitisflo* any operators and the royalty owners. ,statutory any! administrative requirements related to multi-company oil operatiomi. The time. ftm initiation, through negotiations# to agreement Can take up to A load committee Identifies all the parties four or more yours. The length of time and holding surface and mineral rights and concurrent expense of Van negotiations, as Informs them of the possible unit argceenunt:. wail as the risk that the negotiations may - reach all [Mean and the project may be An secihr ntkV committee records the precluded, contribute to the reluctance of oxp rows of the joint organization during many operators to try to initlote or thit plarWrrg procew This committee will participate in amh a program. work witil the technical cornrnittas inn detormlftV the most profitable technique 3A Carr�ulaaa Unison to be applied (considering tax and depreclotlan tequlations, etc.). Many states, recognising that unitization increases the efficiency of production as Probably the most difficult part of the hall as the total amount of ail ultimately voluntary unit reernent Is to determines recovered, have enacted compulsory the p9rde4 itlan rmula — the share of the unitization statutes. These laws require all coatis tach prrt;clpant must pay and the interest-folding parties In an OR pool to join arneW. " hh will later receive from the In a unit, if a certain majority percentage of unit% profits. The input of the technical the pwties agree to unitize. can rmittom it very important in this determination. The value to the unit of California actually has two compulsory ceri,alo mineral rights, for example, will unitization laws. The first requires depend on how much of the oil real-rvoir is unitization in order to watorflood and thus I00luded and where It is located In the to reptessurize an all fleld if subsidence is all-laden formation. Tther Sarre k true for Injuring or Imperiling buildings, harbor* and that valuation of existing wells *- they other improvements at may be Interfarring lacatla% depth, eqe and condition of a well with commerce, navigation or fishery, or will affect how Irnportant it is to a unit. where subsidence-induced inundation could i 14 i 9 • r 1 I wwdwoger bee, hst:lthe safaty, public peace, Thane we numeruua related advantages that "Olfan Or property. result from this. This Ion M imppileable to Ku Ungton fteQh Fiat, by ell rn eeerures, this is a snare at this thm bemn Uum eve presently no efficient prorduotlan tachniquos the total oorkus tlreats fauna wholdance In tires City. volume of all recovered irwraases= the time It takes to produce that ell is reducedl the The waimeed ofttuta Is sonrotknaa nfeered to anmunt of aepital invested (equips rat, in go sawnsifo Low* if 73 porasnt of the we ,11-boars)per volume of all Is reducedi, wOMOV kftro* of an all pool agree to a ,r unit epwUIw,, this law enables the Rate to Second, consolidation of autfece area r Wbe On r*nnalnkq Interasb to pin Ow usually vecompat►ries unitization. by state unit sa well. The Town sits liar, however, low, a unit ogrrramant can only be approved applies only to fields which wane diecovo-el if it provides: befons 1934 and which am at least 79 percent within an incarparatod city. It is "To the full extent practical, for the not clear that this Jew could be applied In organization and consolidation ' surface I*ntkrgton ba+ach bedbuse 1wgn parts of fecllities, Including oil productioe., storage, thb field extend offshotes and into the Bola treatment and transportation facilities, in Chico which Is unincorporated Bounty land. such a manner as will eliminate wasteful and excessive use of land surface areas, Thv rationale behind the law b "that the freeing such areas fir other productive um t n"aropm , development and operation of and devs opererent ..." Farads in a unit for the production of oil and Iles aids In preventing waste, increases the For axarnple, the many small tank systems ultimate recovery of oil and gas, and associated with small groups of wells can be facilitates ineroeaesd concurrent use of eliminated and a larger, centralized autfow lands for ather berxrflclal aeparatioon and treatment plant utilized, purpgsea."� New wells aid redr"ills can often be co n alideted into walled and land ed Under the law, nen-joinere may sell their islands. Existing wells which are not Interest. In the pool at a fair-mwket value. important to the Injection pattern may be This value Is determined by an ass+omront plugged aura abandorwd. of tore "primary tract value" Wood an the I projected future primary produrtlon If no A workshop on urban oil development held in secondary wets mdertekw4 plus the the paauthe+rn California area recognized "secondary taut value" bated on s►stimates these kinds of advantages to unitization, of secondary recovery. Ttoee mefters of the concluding: unit rarest purchase them interests if they we offered for ale. if the buyer and *e ller " . . un it iz at ion was w bane fic lal tool to be: dire nw an a falr selling price, an used in older fields for Improving oil arbitration procedure has bean established recovery, *esthetically improving oil field to daterrffdne a fair valuation~. operations read eliminating deserted, idled or e . unneeded wells."4 3.5 Advantages of Uhitization The benefits of unitization extend to the ft Is claw that umitization is importan, for fiscal status of the City as well. 1A another the application of watea'tiooding and att-or study, the Huntington Beach planning anhenced re every tectvrigUIL Division has analyzed the fiscal impact of all "rations on the City. The findings Indicate that msolldstcd facilities, employing wateerflood end tether enhanced • 15 M yiY'r 1 11 � 1 na i ""every tochnologles are esignifit arst plant may require " laying of new nstireverrus gereee-tam* For example, pipelinso In public right-of"w~yl "Using Arninerll and Chrw re N with highly teyrnparary disruption of the et;Q system otataplideted operotions, use erebout 60 Increaww watvtflowing cowry Inesreass Perot" Of 00 wells in the City to pre&"- demand an public saworega and water esbout 85 pote ant, of the oil end 10 parecent diapmal sy"rf*. Notrethrlea4 feom a fiscal of the oll•rrl+rtad revmms. The reneram for peeerspae:tivat tta rrvwmo generated by this ere V* costa tend tap dee:tone>a as the unitization usually gerratly outweigh thee few Iscilitka an c wmildsteed end 1*as ae:raege costly effeew Is VOW awed tlreet reeversviea lncroaeee to ; plr+k ductlah kre:r*+e@eee. The oparatlons aloo tend to improve because Us oil pool is raw waked by a larger Yher Cost of Police pstroting, for example, is company or unit with a widar financial bass more e0"Itive to the n arbor of Oil situ$ than Horny of the individual operators. This them to the nuereber of all welts. Thust, in a tend@ to make finerting of mitigations ear unitization and consolidation project if the adverse aesthetic and environnantal number of avils stay the same or even Impacts associated with oil production Increase, but Ion sites are usod, police costs easier. The unit can typically provide attributeeblee to oil can decline.. ror another better Bing and landscapings example, the costs of ttw City for sound-proofing and odor emission controls ireooregce WI% Inspection, taxation and than Individual operators. The higher bllllrq all tend to decline when the City can production experienced with a unit and dew with a large, single entity rather then waterflood allows the larger companies or 1 seems of Irdividual oil companies. units to expand monies for better equipment and maintenance so that the newer Revenues to the: C;ty are tied especially to opersticros are ueeuslly quieter, cleaner and the property tax an the mhreral rights and less polluting than older foollitles. Lserger to severance or "peer barrel" tax an companlees or units also experience pt tion. Inteerestinglyr mineral rights erCOMMlera of seam — It Is lease@ expensive to eeastown sit It tied to past productiviityl thus, landscape or murdproof a few Intensively If productivity rises, mineral right's used Iriands thin tursdreds of Individual wale valuation rises* tease. (Although there are send tank sites; the one larger unit can deal orhmt limits to how quickly valuation with theses problems more efficiently thon can rise as a result of Proposition 13.) Also, downs of Individual opesstors. era productivity Increasess revenues from the . seeveranere tax which is simply ■ production In aurnmiary, unitisation and ccinsolid ation of tax must increase, too. urban all operations can be desirable for the following roaesonst Of c urn. there arse soiree negative lmp►actk Lisa of a centralized treatment au production Morasses. Low land to used and unneceesawy or inefficient tank& end yells are tomoveed. �o� in this sane% "The Fieec*l The appeecrene:e of the opwations kMwtso of tail Ciperstians io Huntington Improves►I batter mitigation of other Beach," H+e tingtm peach Planning adverse irto ecis Is usually achieved. Div ideas, iaiarch, M. Carets to the City tend to dec ll ne: tarty i, revenues tend to increase. 16 { r ym � }� �•�+ ,'g1'I"•�{'C'7,, � ,� f�{'d�1 'A III �1Ab'S�`��1 � err rt pp �' r�j,��,�. + � R. A.� a .RM� � ,I' �� } �h�i I�F 'rl•'yx'�^ !Y �, rl-.a♦ '.� r r, �fi"11-1� � id � rj,� '1r,4 t'1 i f ;�+�r�;, i ,1 .4 r�•Tit". •rK �{hrtl�w�� r�r� y�`�a. r y ��� { �� �'� a ��,'�.� 4,����>S �: ,. K'�Jr�' 1# ., red• 7+� •�•� y�1�i• , n �tif + 1 NI}! �f r t � + � ., � ' �;�I,SM e �r A,. " L4 � f Ah � nay -' NM ,1 � y�,.i A �{•,�'�. r rye �S f l ,,[1 y y W A..�� i r r9 � 4, , � r •��[7, �.1�'}�1,fH f� .r " ^A d r f 111 ", r4 'y� 7 i ,.• , ,, �!� 1 .� i ..4 '•Yk.f, ;�i`i"N' � •yy',4 AW '�� � y yi , i, r i+�i�1�%N�/' �,+� i Y,.. .•r 'i1�4�'� i/�.... f•��r j+ y�l. i J t r I taiFF �•'`' � 1 r y'r fay 1 •.h •' r� i't4r y4 F•, 40 for Accen to ON P i 84 fib 'dwatic od the Iwpldllt d 'let r MlrtmW ba Afforded by prier of oil should help to irrrprove kM sNdN ri tl onrsiryr t�olMelo�i a swain rs Praf sbllity of po+t "Usl units in the Ivot" of "nitration seed futuewo Another prking problem Is thst 00 �rpr 41 oueed @bay% *M w that vale of domestle ON to the Weiety rMy rat p Voq jWfe" MOM to urwdotgraurrd all be fAy mflected In its Cavan do—+hated) j �1rq the farmatioh of unit prk s bacceuee danwstle ph tlon prpvidss t nfrs to wok Own posh may be oUwq lose twglblee berwAts to the cau Wy b%Ukob jeot vm his solar tel�ed to the reduction of our sail err bole which r AgM be fwolp soures for eV. This situation rrdght In Wgur fe federal linos for h rir WON ebtlws. dbmsitic produrtlare,* rtM of r it shmld to noted that tvm of All tftw earreldVTMtkX%, howevOr, acre ' thM ptt problerns which hrv* inhibited nstleml 3n M and Be within kt o 01"mtie wd the fthe rquernt application bd►:tiorti of the federal government, not of pid l wUoryr every mthodr the rnsmicipality. we Clearly outside the purview of the local jtri�indyctlan+ Another knportarrt problem reloWd to unitiratiar is the oOat of forming a unit, { h+lery all carrrpsinimo have cited low CH asprotally the cost of gpttinq eno �%P ptider wanrpartedad by price contra* as an operators to join. The existing StAte irroort.+srrt reran why meq potaotirl units compulsory unititatlai Jews we exarmles Of w wW fret have been profitable 1n the peat+ ways to reduce these soots. I i •- f ''M 17 }yyyfe,�j�r+ 'Y.,°I� � ! { a,f(' Y Y. k ±� 4 " 1 ', , 1 'd.. ► f..... , ► g�rr+y*Ayi,3..R `r04, �.`�,�u 1 � 1 Ito dot the lots reuiataa w4marel riots aolutiam to tl prWerm 110 ouLriCIr tlw► W! Rit1 Unitirtotita► of oil b OW4 the Cityls purview, hbwomjp tear City can he 8*44% OW Imt OW C1tp, as "a We to UTVIO"WA Amy future► OWEVOWWO 10bokUm for kW1"tb* pe we and rtttro+W" 6V OW note or fo oral � $*Ad at rOdmit" the eat* nits by not oxoaM�Maty tearlatift y roaaolated wNh tom*v a unit. �*Y thm fmm " au rf lb of thlr flold and by OveWpim add &W 1n boTh 4t thoas t etriate aolr poNaMNa aiataa4 at k bro at awrla of aloe load could be spa adapt area apen in ft fts of wwr hlnp and polloias which would trot tobanization to 100"na to futm prmk* future an+allwativa action by the unitization and wt onced rwovary piogt m ! �! �r Asa gova�na�ta The rbviprl tools for achieving this area the Tralitiorrilyg eonteal over tarsi uve has been City G'Isnsrrl Pun WW us sa kV the donrmin of the local govemmst ordinarweL Optlarnr ftx K tington mot) (al0m%h leipuy, States have pre-emptive r rdinp It: land use polielae we dMousrtbd eor tmi ovow lama uar.) The City Mould In Section 6.0. before reviewing pallay r0 orrylve the two problems noted oboes: options, hvwavarr it Is Impment to discuss InINORWn Beach �rxarpa�ivtriato carti a�t�� �a w t. Thee a� Whe the re lculw these ire situation In i�lny�eMa relevant. G'r91 y �P she M alto understand that the appra Ante That is the tople of the next section. • 1• f y pp� Y Y ..1 . Me r ri:� •, �,�,'}`y�ai 11,.,ti� ,u� r r 'i� ,y+�' � r +• t Y � y k 1 :�„{,M'}•1•,; Y .k .!. ' ;' M M1. , u.w , „ 'h l* ,,'•, r 7•',f.�P a �• '• 'T%",���M .O'+' i. � ��•�!tr by ;• .�:M. P�,;ii1�F}�+!I�Zir?.iY{ 1•!., e ,'' •,R.'�', yr, ., •, 'r �Y�' •r' k �.,,t1Y rf, Iny'sti tr., ,'.' i, •C'�'1 M SS r '`. A { 1 ` 1 4!k' An tlwr ZA to awr 3.5 an mmppiw 11,11prM only of HIMtitl *Un activo wrus, Cftvm fte I 4"W M 0" to to tte mda owly "St" In thlr palm of t!r brut It 1�' * wd**Uon aid mawa for jeM than 20 p n** of the y �► ► It it she an ores wh�+r Wei kta"aL Amlnalh the athw erMrJae all Ivw of ON pNraala snd mampony 1n f t~dty o has vlWtually no 4w lb u. ttforepw Iro in t1 pert the ON no* are ped opio lyr wfth mmwd (Ar imb d w own own me won thwe t Mtr a� Ntf v boom to tern %+W WOU Log boar y wr, drilled to ofhtwe 0 b laosed baw Paaift uhitizatbon No bwn dlffiutt not only ` mO Pow Awrwwh fft m l4cwrr for r sr mo . % but r Street. Abu • boom arbthsc 'OfOw I" oerrrpwniMr a8 Loke tilt which have the � to bawd rr a t vet woo 1wlvda1+ A t" unkizatian POP Oft a porticwlwly la r" of Oft " go within the COWASI staid In thin pat of the fields r1ouft LIN Of the Ji --my msersh only sbwt 14 are m �►wlp�Zi�� 1 00 for an ptorlratlan• 02 was tint db umva+od In A tinptm Bach Thft ON* of the Raid her navw boa in 19A at r site rear ft prownt �� t"b because oMwmvhip of btermaetfion of Goldrnwaat St t and mil ► t Id i hwy traprrrrrrtad srd AverAn. Durk* the mmt gal ra+ % all MrltttWa ha not bean oftwed. vm 0mvered �� !M►�nttr�tan �b V e ' 90wh'but the City proh%kod oq *Ming In Since that timr, production hoe declined to Ow Tew4at and Downtown @rase. However, a relative tricklo. In 19794M), 3319"3 . r acvtinmd winos of ou 4.irstians for barrel& were rmmed, an everts of only of 3310 Met (GOMM" t gtro t) in a 390 bw @Is per dale far the entire wr�aw borer field (whkh is the "$eecuff" golf only about four beanie per day per well. �ttw► Alyd r+eeldwrrtlof dev+alopm�rnt) Ownplod OW City to lift those rwrfeietlaht in other parts of the City, ratably ths, hem 1936 oW is allow *lift between 23rd north of taloldenwost, the two ms jor and lath Street& Two very k o Cant oil oompenisih Chevron end Aminail, run highly saw% the "Jowl' and the Taira" were corwildeted opamtians which tap verb large quickly discovered. the Rates Divisiae of urrdergrsemd areas. Trees conVanlea bssg�an Coil wid On noted than opplying water lnjectiors In the late 1930% and new have extensive water and stearn "lr,tereelve drilling activity followed flood projects on well as several tertlary these two discovetiea, resulting in the recovery pilot programs. These cortVanies fostas , development and closest specing have employad these tschnologias to work exWle. cad in California to that data. these arras much snore completely end efts walls wiry drilled are 25-foot efficiently than otter woes in the field lots."S where fragmented ownership hoe precluded unitization. The Townlot is we of those Another knportarrt zone, the "Tar" or woos whk:h has not yet been waterflooded "NOW was footed later in 1926. In because the large rwtrrber of operators there November of that year. the City opened the have not formed a unit. lent of the Townlot and Downtown to drilling, • t for a "fire sane" between In meant years, Pea Increasing value of lame 3th sad s Streets whiche was excluded In near the cesst for now uses (especially for oaf to pnewt the City's pains pel housing) along with drClinlng production oewn malol district - - a short strip along have prompted many oil operators In the Main Street. Qh December, 260 1926 Townlot to abandon tam lr wells and to production peoked at 6304W barrels frorn 78 redevelop their sites. Also, after the Local wells. Pretkiction dropped quickly from this Coastal Plan Is completed, development early pa* and then gradually declined until pressures on the matey oil sites In the the later 1940%66 Coastal zone will likely intansify. 1n light of these affects, It appears verb possible that During the early years of the Reed, so many of the oil sites In the Townlot area dm*kVment of the Ter Bone was irhibited will be redeveloped that theta will not be beoium the all In these pools is very thick. enough active weU holes nor enough The viscom ooze carried large amounts of available surface woo for a fc-ture send in It whlah often clogged the wells and secondary recovery profit. awnpHooted later pro asaskrg. The growth in eutotnoblis use after World War tI spurred This possibility raises several question=. much a h10 demand for oil that even thick First, how nxoh oil could be recovered if an of becarne profltable to extract and enhanced recovery pregrom wearer process. This prompted a swond drilling u*dertaken7 Second, even if there is a large campaign in the Townlot eras ea operator* ■mount of ranuining aft, tow likely Is began to exploit the previously negWetsed unitization end a future secondary recovery 'far coresrw program? Third) ehould the City take steps to help preserve eerie to then oil reserves In 19S4 94 pools were located fsether south ando if so$ what should those steps be? The In the ftldo near this Downtown., lntovive ►ummirder of this xeport tries to give drilling In this "southeast extension" of the tentative answers to each of these questions. Tovrnlot rseulted P anothat production peak In the m1&I93ft 20 + �.��r�? � 'f"Yn��7 Y, r. r.. It�r r •� �^� r , � p. � r , � '�. r r '4ti) 11xf ;y ' Yr Nor' y F i t 1►1 M tO de 00 0 ld we �` ittNrI ro Od tmm the M i tan y 1000 1�1 hion artknoted ft fnbs weemrabb o11 im the rorrnlet li" The purpM of thrril►e studins is not to m0abliih an mot "urMOMI film" for retrwinkv a bob to OUP NA to Irdis ate wtwthar ti it enough ON to r W*@ on enhanced reco0ery ptt YOM 5 Possible SM4 MM4 '*f protecting aaurfaraa leartrw k woos eW aeCM 1w each a pr geam k E, hVertent. The fiesk tec". po used to atirnate the errrarelnirrp reaer�r k the "volutrretrie wethod," which une date about the physical p#teunrtten of the field pot eetlmate the voLow of the orl9kol all In plane COOK # 1'htMAr raerteMt '4+saavra�l► t11M�ta�f'+�" �• e of the of the e11 thht 1040W son be recovered by dl oxtrection ieadmla qlw + appliaed . tb VID O1XP mill artirnmW. ki this trey. one can determine • how nux!, aril could be recovered by an >i. UM welmo d movaty program`. This rrwtl+avd r eaiuk" much vokgic krf matbou Firm% one must know what oil zarm wwbrIls this port of the field. Example of Croee-Section lkderlying Figrus 5.1 Uka0vtoo a typical crams-section ovmlot. L"oer the T~14 tros$ No ripen 502 er4 aura:eI Divlelcn of tag and SJ alraw their areal astern. The kv pono t oil sK4wwhV ants iralthft the Mlddls Bow Lower Bob% Way or AC, U"m 3orre ersd Main lwnea. HIMM-0Mrer bown of the leek of come we not liquid pools, nut are racks of rrli�r4,6 datop the Coy nerd Marvin sores which contain oU in arnall pore!$ between woo not included in the rraiumetrie grains of solid material. Thus, the total atrtknUM Thu4 the rawlts should be on volume in sage-feet tnuast be nwltiplied by a tive Correearvartive aside. Opareslty factor" — the pr vwstsge of the Mork which k trot eelld, but b actually By roultiplyirrg the awns of a zorw in mcreat tpatcas Or pore• between the solid rtinat.trials, by Its tilt thickraw Mn facet, the total volute and evi hold that flolft " wever, not all of of the tone can be determinwl. The zoim% that @pewee k filled with all. Water is also 21 r r :. raw .� '��• 1 r•l � r Pj I .rv•f uwWw�-p ly��Y�.ls.(•)Y` r � ,� '�' C„ .dlk �'.-:;:;:oi a$xL'•�+:;,i�{AK`ax � ;': y.�, •r J a YAtF, >tiu{,�f[i..:.yy TaY�)- .t}[r��:ry,,,/-dyl�K :yyo}}app',•+1(�0{{�'��.pp,, y/K�..Yy�� _ -J�� N/.�Ob'Y, S-IM um mm" mays r s?M;'i P,�Aftw mom. tat, low, FtF Z JJt SP" r;fnt�w.a)va. �{.�H�ayty ..�vp-ry.. �,F `••v�Y,r�; �-y�fpL� �sat,;.rry���/.��•. '. r om y+T���ALf]r1H. �p�agF�IV�C.i '{���ppyy{ 14�y�P7.1•�Lpfl'�"�� !��?� ST_ -(.VW�''�ZY9ki�iiJ �FY+m+'rh Y�o 4P�,••.y�`p�;T}i..~jib. ,� 'car /A ,�1p)cv op :•• - ••urxw'�;r/ ��f� �:C N ,,� R1.ii•- .tY3t�•n iNL•_ R`%yLd YVO•fJ�S .�J , •� _ -rw-error •�� ..�,..� nr:.;iytitV ,y.:,.:::r`:_, ,�r�; aavxM,*�i.rw.vuw�..•f►�.- £�•-,:,.�.�.. ::i�nrn...�'Gs_::. S. �...r ii7�:i;:� } :a-iw a4•YL...�s''.d..(�y� �,n..:.�,•.y:n, ''�•. i `t'• r i Z:-�A� �=''��(1 7ir.t.u.' 1L,��r ';•, �{ 1 s.- ,�, M�DA`� gcvw•�'.++ roW 4M� ��g{� Y.�6��7t1[�',< ! •• wax — sae ? wool mom fft 4W ,. SUM low JNNIIX� all ve* l2af�#s 1894 R98wws !" . M IL k . IPt prime AM "OtwOOn OW and Table $a suRvna isw the date and e116m Th^ tale tail abhors muses be calentiarar for 001P 1n the Townlot. The ` mk%*W by a "wetaer oskfttlW IMP Is lotlawked at 112.3 mllllon barrels. 11 } �r ity r VW 3) a The next amp Is to determins how much of 441"Clon feeeata*e 00 nwbor of the ' O(XP an still be recovered by -faMt" and sail w drtere k" TWO No eaa+dory road 1041 Y hlrechnolaglew Attar 7,7 bus Is of +ell in an awtopt arhal cm dbcueling the perfarrrnwvo of different can aftkmle bervels by ae this Meetse extraction tatchniques In Huntington Bach Fwalllr eaathar variable called can %V ore other nearby fields with ohginsers from f volumes faetW nwit be the M is Arnlrell arse Chevron, the o Ides sd. This abnply eadjueb foe ol follawft rarrovor fretare weft established differ between the volu"O of the feet the Townlat=town wool primary, deground &%i Its voMeor at the a rfece. .30; as owulary, .111 and tartlury, .07 of 0W* tbaily, the prlmwy Mate is rawer and Table 51 vurntrraaarisse shwas varlabise sand aaotdsry rate hloari however, the the foe*rwls used to determine 001P. aglrwon supgastad that the very I&V term land unuwally Intensive production has Table 9191 probably accounted for a hoor primary rate d thus a layer potential ac:ondary an are in the Townlot was. VOLUMETRIC. METF KY.) These data and these recovery facgars welt them over 20 million barrels of oil A n am In acres rmy still be ncoversd In the Townlat area P Poroalty If s eandary ,seer taertiary technologies con H net thkciawn in foot be applied, Sw . water Saturation a : as fan, Ion factor To help confirm the roaxnableness of this VX • bbls/acre*foot estimate, the Platoft Division calculated t] P r aar191121 all In place recoverable reserves using another method, the o ftellns mA-ve technique." This method uses the post performance of the field for A x h x P x U-50171738 a OCIP eatImatlrV future production. Fon sula for Vaylumetiric Method. The estimate would be most accurate if the ammel production records of every well ever Brumes "Vahetion of Ob Prvduckig *Nlsd in the Townlot/Downtown since 19►26 MOW-- tiaaa". State Board of warm lovaetanl, reviewed and totaled. This Ega>itationo 1g71. kind ofreaera� Is very difficult and tinta-conpumirg. Instead, the Planning Reliable deers for these variables wire CHvlslon researched the production diffiadt to obtain. Not thicknesses of the sum mles for this pert of the field found let sorrre in the 'Townlrat else were unsivellabler several COG Annual, Su�mn ary of Operations and Mier* estimated from cr ss.srectlons and and the neon=pmXcEtion records of oct ve from disauarlons in averat OW reporta. wolfs. A reasonable decline curve was then Awed extern was 92timataed thorn Maur Interpolated between the few known data no" of the zones in DOG reports. The points. Oumtrwlative production was then other variables were obtained from OGG satinWed froth this decline curve. See &W industry estimates. As wwwtlnned Figure M. The total production for the above, the Stray and Main zones were Townlot/Downtown Is approximatoly 43 excluded due to !3ok of data; thus the million barrelso estimstes aura probsb!y ,louse. 23 k WAMI'Am MOM OWN a� a son rim wm Z. fL ' , i0w z iik >al Bt.Jb'! rw 4# mma _i k'f ,r�.,�+M.*,'�a +/a�ts.�,iccaa»;::�:kv•t a f 'L-:ti:' �}SS7RP�3 a�S;ail•: �,3�: �1�..J :Alm + k<8 900 mom _ s now mom � � k� iV.-3M••1� saw .4a in w1wo low mom soma Imum . t..<>JINYI]dY 5'Sy. RA i eK A I ° .. - . ; Bcaa dap 4: s X p .. A . t �',•r rye,-11'�'1t�.',� ' `.`•- J M y � iI��' )fr �p,.i� � �y'� �° 1 �fi'�1�'k 11 ° A `i �yl� +.i��� ', � �'i �,tf• f, ,,,� r• r � � ,' d�' f d � f � � u�'� r +y^�,r�'1 1 ,•y �•,��•�f„� .yj�i a� "j �''1,q �A �' � �rF I, iFF lk_�A' �4 i r°'' � �''I �'M1� II'� "�N� ���"' ' .s,�.. � �h�r�', ?�� 1t!�` ,,'."�1� � A�' 4, :'�'�jiS�• � �V fi�i ^�, � � �+ •* �•1�,�.�n p � t i :� :N. �� 4 � � ;�' t� r 1 � ���,Z r �� f' yry �i�i ,•�- �' 47 !u °r "4r�i' ,ti•,f• �}t Sjf,'�i`p,,°A14�,F *f�''''j' I i ��, ' � � � �^ �• •�, 1 ` �•�'�.. .r°��...;w 1�,i��l�v7+'i*,","�•,1��1iw:�*'�,•,"r'�',�,"'1�� �, .'lL/1 i�fhL�ri�i 1�•�,jdp�'�"�'i,�,���,,'��Y1'.r.l, i�, X ��� ;A�+�l!"�''.f`���," "r',1�' •,`!'�i��"�'��•�,��..� tir:Ej •a c 1 1•1ti- _ to to M N LD a iL 21 �� 'r�'� r h���� r � �� .� ,�. '}�: n� ��� ""d1.�;�y ��,r l. yyS,���{il� •'�• � �Q/•` ��':LLx.' vl,r,•����,r J', •i' r tl 7f�1 �?r.i. � �.�� � ` i,., r a ',T^l1RiV ��N` 'H�f�'��•q .h � �M _ `,� M1,�r:�•'� r;r� '"� ., F }IA� ���'�.� �� ^r•r .'1,�., �',7'�' � ' ��,9 a''� �`1II�ti ., i' �L��`J y � �v��r� ,�,`�" Rn , 4� I �1� .i Y.y r t� 1 �'� �ti , 4 �rr `VA x •'' 1, r h • �,� �/' Y*n' r } W quo ' 1 /L '• x•r h 1� a tr .\'' a +'t �L 1 a r 1� ' v r T'i ;i'�99R�'n�7 u.,,Y�,.. . ,; �., '�c'„�' '� "'M "1 •�r Ct+h^wan ' Y , It ' II • f Y t r j A Table 5.2 �Ct IE Al H4L P3 Sw4 85 a" NOW IN 330 80 M .30 1.07 ?� I,�nw r� lxr 3S0 10� .20 „30 1,07 i Lww Jw" ISO 100 .32 .35 L07 44 Mnsry of (Aberstlara o 1958, awtour Maps rAlmsW fjwn vor9ous DOG spurts � 3 ow In"try "U"' "s f * setl�e�s � astimxtrrr 1 0!tP ■ A h P (140w) 7014 F Mr. ■ M ddb ftho 330 9 8o s .10 U - Ja)(79758) 41.07 : 33.0 ftlllan bamis Li &lee 330 x 100 x 61 (1 - X)(7,758)t 1.07 . 49.7 rnlWon bunels Upwr Jww 150 x 100 x .32 (1 - .35)(7975e) * 1.07 s 22.6 mlUlan barrels TOTAL 112.1 rollban bwbls �y tacttoee Primary 30 pit Mid "man $a�arrdarly 12 "reaft 23 .9 MUM Tertiary 7 par rrt 7A rawa# I i +�Ia�Mi`;\ei�to oU ■ &wokl ry eW TeMwy . ZL3 n iMcn bwmle Cekzutatkn of 001P errd RwulnWq Recowrablr DY LAWng Vokanstri►c Method, rt : Hkotkgton Beach Plomkq Divislam I ( M Y }, 771 VA,i Tjo eufrw otlotoMrly Ineicaus tMt pro& Con barrels could still be extracts+►i If unitization li+ this ass u*rg currant extMIlon and tho wplicat ion of oft 4io; nUrostllbds In oapptmd Inn Its IlmlL "thus, tec►xwlogiss wdre 6weenlul. ownulative prajuction should approximate all of primary pnndu6tion, which is (cuing These calculations vmm revibwed tq• the morns r9mvery factor as In the engineers sit the OM, Amiroll and Volunertric method) .30 of OCIP. If 43 Chevron. They mwun*d with City staff million bat"ls Is .30 tat CAP, than OCUP that the urroethods used were sowed, but that must be 143 million bareelce Using the wane the available dots may rot be completely nwwary factory w the volumetric nuthod securate. Thud, the value of the analysis Is for so tr A— Gx2) and t*rtlary Gal? not so much In tha &xaCt numbers as in rar"voriy, the stiff sftirnates that about 17 providing ion itodicstion that Considerable oil IIo�rM bartalis ew!d be axtractrd by rwsatvert probably herein ba wath this part otn eddltlo wl 10 million by of the, City. tolrtlary. RemainkV recoverable oil would be &bout 27 nMllcn barralrj. 'Sm Table 5J. 5.3 This P:39-,%Iblllty of a Unitization arOTManced Recoveryact. The daallns cum method wggests mwnewhat larger [aserves than the T1te analysis above vin gists that there Is volum*tric, which to not surprising becauer probably arough oil rernsinirtg in the c*rwin eknawn producing zones wsf,v Townlot/Downtown ore* to malts an excluded from the voiurnetric study due 'to enhaneed mcovery project profitabla If lack of data. Ttrur, the two mrthids give unitization could be achieved. T" next sawbftly similar estimates of recoverable step, than, ie to try to determine what the reserves, indleat,ing that perhaps 23 million obstacles to unitization am and If they we likely to be overcome in the future. Table 3.3 Pritnsrrlr P octloarr _ .30 OAIP = 43 million OCIP 43 million (1/030) a 143 million lisaattd■ Production = .12 OOIP • .12 (143 million) = 17 million: bbl T+titl# r clan = .07 LAP .07 (143 million) * 10 million bbl Total voor Ming, recoverable;ail = 27 million bb W Calculations of Remaining Racovmble CCU Usiu-g Dciine Curve Methods Soumm Rmtington Beech planning Divalon. 27 •y it i r 1n order to do this, the City Planning The operators were also eaked in Indicate DIvisiarn sera as queatlana3alre to P11 the oil the real:is why unitization has never been operators in the Towrnlot/Oowntow ono. achierred ha;o. Merit fait the t. too marry of The questionnaire and cover latter are the operators were unwilling 9A join a unit inciudr,4 in Appendix ru and that past pricecontrols on ell rendered such an undertaking unprofitable. Several The results of the questionnaire ore respondents frllt that City zoning sure meelzed In Toble 5.4. We that these restrictions rele'ceed to drilling new wells had results cwt be raessured In twin weryes the contributed to the problem. Otter mesons I" Is sWpir by the numbs: of aparrtnfe give% Inchx ea+e the difficulty In securing who sieve differrent noporaesr A problem approval from lend owners to eancurrbor with this Is ell Companies are vialghtesd their preiperrry for mwiy years. Another 0*011y, est"Mogh a few awn ltl or mono respo Went "oetbd that the lack of wells whl;tr marry have only one. The second rellabley engineering diets would hinder any method Is to rolculate the percentage of the unitization attempts. total Interest In the tiold held by the opera'A�Vn who gavel a partICUlsr response. The City Koff else, noted this lack of readily This is as somewhat more manningful evallsble date. ms.ssul a because the response of the rMatively large operation@ wUl be nx re When asked If there difficulties could be ;nrportant to ai unitization project than the overcome In the; future end unitization made very small companies. This method weighs possrtrle, the companies were equivocal. each operator's response in proportion to the Seven operators, accounting for 21 percent percentage of the field he awns. Interest in of the Interest in the field, answered "yes"; the field wee consider-ad to correspond to six oporetatt, accounting for 41 percent of mineral rights valuations made for this ahem the field, raid, "maybe"; and five cony snie% by the Orange Cow ty Assaesso% office for accounting for 12 percent of the ftereest in property tax purposes. the fluid, responded 1no." Guestlor tres were rent to the 16 Finally, when asked if tai company would be . oper4tors In the Townlot/Downtown area; 21 interested In joining a v-61untary unit, seven respoWed. This response Is indicative of said "yes"; five, "maybe" and nine, "no." ,one of the principal problems feelog a Yet those responding "yes" and "maybe" unitizetionn programs getting ,gh account for da percent of the total interest •uperatore to consider evert else possibility of In tha field, while time answering "no" forming a unit. Howevwg most of the larger account far 19 percent of the total T ratem did fill out the questionnaire; the interest. Mtersetingly, eeme operators who respondenb account fer about 80 pecent felt tiaras was likely to be enough oil to of the total Intareest in the Townlat field. make a unkl*atio n project profitable, and some who felt weh ea project might be The all corrrpamiss gerrrerelly concur with the feasible in the future, were also definitely analysts In Section 5.2 that there may be not interested In joining a unit — at least at nle;niftcant aril ne►setvrs remaining in this this Urns. are*. Chly thus respondents felt that It was %vey unpkely" that then is ermuo oil Tire results of this survey indirarte Out a to make a water flood ecanomirally voluntary unitization project In the Townlat profitable, and only arcs cited Vw 1*0 of oil arse Is not imnnirent. Although a nujority as a resew preventing a waterflood at this of the working Interest in the field appears tones. Thirteon of the responde.t s to be interested In such a project. a + eminting for about 62 percent of the significant minority is opposed to it. In working Interest In the field, answerod "very addition, many of the operators (who hold likely" or Optttrepa0 wtnean asked if there was about 10 percent of the irhterest In the fi+rld) enauq h all to make a waterflood profitable. did rot rwspoW to the questionnaire at 411. 29 1 y y nnl ."ROW r . 4r .j r• IDo you Oil* tbire is enough recoverable ail in the Ttnmlot/ maim part of the muntington Deacb Field so that a water.. h flowed would be a vonosdcallx profitable (if unitization could be achieved? t Workina Interest No. of Respondents is Townlot Field g 36% 6 26X ' 3 St S 11# It you thtak.. there is enough oil to molter unitization and vwate! fl*WUng In the blot area profitable, do you think other E obstacles can he overeme so that such in project is possible In the future? k % Working Merest No. of flespandents in Tawnlot Field 7 21% d dl% d 1xt 3 Etc WE I � Mich of they following reasons do You' think have prevented a watw[lxflood program from happening Vk the Townlot area? moo of Re222!6e0ts 1 11 : tamed r lack of data, difficulty in getting appowmal of ImW cw mrs to encumamr surface properties. w a lateresteO in joining a voluntary unit for the as of arterfloe3ding? t Working interest no. of Respondents of Townlat rfield ..Jobarr, ? 24t S 37% ! 19x Teebler S.i QMOtlae"Im Bawl m Sim e s Herthmton both plwmki Divb1cm 29 y,r � 1 . This hek of response underlines the F■igura M lllustrehis the woos in and roar difficulty In achieving o,nitizetion at this the Townlot ova where all well drilling Is tkm The cooVatrnioc as elan equivocal on currently allowed. Then we Amited to the whether unittsation Can be achieved to the loess operstad by Chevron and Aminoll future. Thee principol reason holding up northwest of Goldonwost (altar 01 and /ZX unitlzetioory now that price deco ntrals are an Island operate-1 by Chevron at 17th offect@4 will be the inability to get enough Street and palm Avenue Crate P. a operstenrer Interested. The many raseona why felatively largo ate& operated by 1 _:!-•.non oper'etalw may not join • unit have tteaoTt now Lake Street &W d4) &td a stroll oisarnd �ownad tso Av Amino U discussed above. by between 18th cord 19th Streets along Pacific A unitization project In the future Is still Coast Highway (alto 03X This last alto is poetible, especially if either of the following l tansively used for walls directionally f Owmarloe develops. First, as the value of drilled under the moon and it Is unclear Us land Increases many of the operators whether this area would be available for will choose to sell their sites. The smaller wells tapping the Townlot area, at least in e:wVmlae with few wells and low the near term. All of the other sitars would productivity will tend to meycle their land very likely be able to eccomodste walls and first. imarsesingly, the workl ng Interests In other facilities in a Townlot unitization orW the field will be held by companies secondary recovery pro)wt. Figure 5.3 interested In continuel all production. shows ail the existing oil sites in the f Townlot area. City ordinances currently Sus w4 In V'v face of domestic oil sallow existing wells and redrilling on most edwrrtoM the State or federal government of those paareol% but prohibit new walls. male aanact a strict compulsory unitization low so that weandery and tartlary The surface: area needed for an enhanced extraction technologies can be applied to recovery project depends largely c n the do awsetic oil flelds. These laws would number of wells needed to produce the require agrosment among a smaller majority pool. As dioacuessed In Section 1.0 above, porcerntaaga of the operators before wwwting Injection and production wells are Losually con"lawy unitization. For sxampie, some arranged In patterns to facilitate the Staffs require as little as 60 pmeant of the efficient sweeping and subsequent collection interest of the field to agree to a unit of oil in the zone. Consequently, rough before forc kq the rame Wader to ja lm estimates of the number of wells needed in Currently, companies holding more then 60 an sa harvaid recovery project Can be made percent of the Townlot wonting Interest by calculating the specirq of wells In a cowry be aalroody, at loost t Astivelyr pattern and dividing that factor Into the Interested In a un It project. total number of acres In the Moore to be worked. For example, angirnsers at the 9r1► Surface Area Regiron nts Division of Coil and Gas estimated that the spacing for a waterflood project In the As the City molders the ism of helping to Jones zone w•:-,ld be approximately am well preserve surface &rasa for future oil per 10 ocrael and that only about 25 wells operatioo ns In the Townlot, two key questions would be necessary for this kind of project arias 1) hoar much area Is oneaded to there, accomodstoe a waaterflooad or enhanced recovery project? &W Z) whom must these The characteristics of the zone will effect sites be loortasd? Much of the information the kind of recovery method used, which used In answering these questions was could in turn affect the Wwinog and the &Wled by the DOG wW by Eastman number of wells nioaded. The Bolas zone, Whipstock, Incorporated, as company for exai*:e, holds a very viscous oil; thus, Involved in directional drilling projects. storar% rather then water, would likely be 30 « « 7y T is r bhp N� ' AIL; ryr �'�',' •- 'v •�, r�' I r •^' 4 eIr � `r ONW•. yy •Ny<�K•�.,''.�' � 4 N�91+•.�N'r� �r'����r, '�.' . � r, pi���'.. p� � � "• 11. .'�N, �}�. '�.,�, ', � �� � ., �� �,� �a.'.�.: i ■ a • �iy « r, 2 asks t i k 31 rR ri Mi .4. M -4-•QYr-VN PPdWbW .. - J r{ �' it ..----ram •% ti 1 1r• .' I r M `` ' rJ .1,�,•,+wa fir' ''i,. • . 44 'r J iO4Mted iota the fortr►stion because the hot Thus, the surface wee currently afforded by F staern he Ips the th Ick o u to flow more the dr d i al tes (01-3 in Figure 3.3) in and frOellr. 8*eauie the all must be kept warm near the T+awnlat/3owntown could probably far this toOmlque to work, aM because the sceamodate this wards needed In a secondary them and oa tends to cool as it moves or tertiary recovery project, even In a dwough s fornatian, the spsalm of the closely spewed stesmflood. wells must usually be much closer In a steam 0r"10M thrs In a weterflood. Mother Important consideration, though, Is �kwav at the DOG estimated that one ft location of these surface areas relative POP 3 sera or Oven Oros roll par13 to the underground oil pools, As mentioned seas misnt be needed to effect this kind of In motion 14v %cells an be dhvetionsMy Orr. Thus, from a� 64 1* as many as 128 drilled so ttot a few rntralized surface ��rhight. be needed in a steamflood of woos can sceeni Aste wells that produce a the Townlot Balsa zomz much larger "surface area. The most Important Contra Int an how for a well can Dohaldrering the usual setbacks from public extend from a surface site is the ,depth of ru nt-of-way end fmm nearby uses, the the zone the well Is tapping. Ttw shallower ! as tans area needed ft well drilling and zones, we mors difficult to reach because RM Ur mnc% 25 wills or more c Duld be the angle of the well must be mors acute* r+saily eccomodated on an oil operation sits Eastman Whipstock calculated the distance wanly the size of a square ble-e-k In the that a well could be &IUad In the Tnwnlot Uwnlot area. arse under usual scorwmic and gpologlc J conditions. Wells trapping the Bolan tone i - -� could reach only about 1,3M feet from the Figure 5.6 owface bore hotel wells into the much deeper Jones zone could extend abort 2AOD feet from thrr bore hotel (sea F 19ures 3.6 and 5.7� Using thane estimates., FI'r jures 3.9 and Depth 5.9 illustrate how much of the submsf ace Townlot/Downtown field can be rerahed from the existing drill sites. If part of site —low 03 Is considered evetable for this kind of projent, then virtually all of the Jones zone can be reached from the presently available drilling sites. Likewise, a very substantial part of the Bola zone Is also accessible f 00 from the existing site% although a %M MIderable area in the middle of the Townlot my be Inaccessible, t immrs "corn Chevron and AminoD �Ob 71ested thm: wrens could be extended even farther than Umm estimated 2mits if tracesses^y, rAhough such wells would be 1000 21D00 marts difficult to drHi end mare expensive. Lateral. 8ctonT. A stem proles, adds a further factor Into the analysis. As discussed above, steam t*nds to lose its host alter It moves away Directional Drilling Pattern for Welke from Its soar to bollarl Ttwr bottom of than stsom lijaction well cannot be mote Reaching the 6olse Zone. than 1AM - 1.300 feast ftom the boiler, IN otherxiso the Asom 'om fro much host as 0ouroe1 Eastma Whip ftek. k trewels throuO the well that It is Iro ffsctive, when It r whes the oil pool. • a. :•• p ,may 1. Ell E J El EEK3 AM d"m AL 4.0 Y v • r L� 1 /, � 'C•555 fill r'� • IY 1 N � � R Ya� S , TV' tr am mow Sam now 0 . 0" loom jr mom WAS AW I M 1 + - lYi►M�,Air�t�L it '' '' •• � n .., �. F yi 4PI. I 'r f i i Another way of looking at the situation Is Flours s.T that in order to undertake s comprehensive anhenced recovery program for the IrownlotlDowntowry raw welly or the ,M redril inn of existing wells may be needed in the aces roughly between dth and 13th Streets. Furt1wrn m ee, because of the problem« of host lams In a star rn pro jec t, a steam agenatator (bailer) n+W also need to be located In this was. The current zanktg Iowa affecting the existing oil sites in this ease all&m the boiler equipment end redrilling, but do not permit now wells. kh sumrnasry, a waterflood or other enhanced recovery project for the Jones zone, and psosurnably for the dearper Mo in zmvj Could probably be acrromodated from the existing -+ drilling sites -in the Town itrt/Downtown are es, A comprehensive program for the shatllowsr holm :a m would probably Involve stearninq, and might require Mvme narw •la., D walls, the iredrilling of existing wells and the location of steam producing equip&Tent outside the existing drill sites In sn area low SM between bth aruhd 13th Streets. Lateral. Extent There we currently several oil operation sites In this area which could be utilized it DlreetiMW C*illing Patto% fear Walis such a project. The zoning an tree sites RafthhV the Jones Zone. allows the aredrilling of wells snd the Installation of oil recovery equiprmnt, but SOW= won Whk#toek, does not allow for the dr g ling of row wells. Vistas fqt su opwts Out * easoondery twovery ownwam• (a1i irmf =WX which utilized exhly t 1.alpt sill @104 tniot naR be able to M M 'et port of the Iolse Ion% �o y betasrrare dtw ad Ift 5tMC4 ' 35 , �, n C 5 , • i f � � fS�7 • . . , ��M . �.•M�` ice, A f,w�y y ,• '•yti y..' .. N „III ` •, ,• i ;w i• � iw.•j,d y y; r !+Ar a- for the Cltj in .betlan sM suggleds ttmt a urbanlastlan far the facUltiaar naconwy for pffewt of ON on*** be an aft mod mcevery pofirt It unitir4t[an l r ti fin ft Tavrn169100 r A&M WON h reaY:ad In thO `fAmft. &W 2) 1Jt'i xi ivation wound wd err mmvd t1+at any advom JiMma a an nrae�y mstl wom appll . AlUxk* a sjoh as !rousing aW aarttal were tion Aft Ity of ft all Werntam thane have n dtigated to aaMtrbla bwla.a ' a twrtetive � ks such a tnRizoWn dm Prot appW Maly In i +� Anslyda by ft City ple ning off ;. .D argv . tlfpr kinds of lowbutea eruct pulla1 *61ch, w wW directly intpaati rrrauitkq Imm err si w�l� med nwmery ptcjact aan telly be lW v hMu e#ra �url*al[aRlan of raitbptodt and# In tao% wrah` pr jaalra 1010's Stub, tctwft art tend to- mAm wWlea[nblr offmar and s t1. wl•a. tar 0 city wen ierommm banahalal wAs in antra Bice l) 'ham to Nmove 0=0 do lrownlot rntaw 6 A 41aauarian tt , llh W :l. .lv3 thb lum of rapid of pa +onRtirl bgmts wW their s., .. ^,.,,,�•;.t `:• : ,,. . , ;��, • m[tiWlarra is ,, Inelu+Jed In amthae report Ir. th : 1&4 041 lUmveRd Qlt ttawwwy Taahmlagr". ram•.. . .. .. _• .,. .• ww.�r� s .. .w. _ ., ... ' womb ... .r. 1 1 f N ear n discusses the policy eptlona Mure ster than three res. grill site 01 In able syll to the City for prewvifq surface Be 3.) lo designated O-L For purpows arm UMN a future undtIrstion project Is of this discussion, there Is no practical lnotig M d or uMU it Is appererrt that suede a difference between t1-1 and 0-2. The 1.4m ags Is so a mftly that restrictive Importent point 1s that bath permit, raw pellaias are unreasonable or unwire. we Us, vAgo the a suffix Ows root. &A V : Thl+ discussion In Section SA Indicatedthat retions. 7M the fire OXIOUrrr drill albs could prab*bly Wear»tweditto an anhar'rcod exec• .*ry prugrsnw except peth■ps for s �rirrg the history of all corMishenalve stesrnflood In the genies apmrttIorM In K nthvtarr Ne edt. as well as rams* The steramtlood might require Ow flee thee! eel praekrction amtributve e#dditionsi surface area outside the drill, to ft owmminity such +ss employment and ante, somewhere between 23th and 6th so Me i kY% low-am regulations Stmts. There are several existing oil heave tt'aditk naily accommodated ail operation sites In this was which we xorred eartivitles. O; thus steam equipment and mdrUling we permitted, but no new wells* Do City currently users three zoning dbtrict% called NO," V-1" and 10-2," to This indicates that current regulations *MOW ON aptertlara. Mora apercifirslly, would allow unitirrstion end enhanced Nor of dwo Is a zone suffix whit h Is =*very. The relevant question, however, attached to ea boom zoning dasignation such In how long will these sites be available for n tssidsntla4 commercial or IndistriaL such a project? Both the uses p4ninitted In the bras tome, as wet! so Me oil-minted setivities permitted Because the Q, 0-1 and 0-2 districts are by kiss suffix stonev con be lergsUy conducted only suffixes, other uses are already an the site. permitted on these sites. At any time, the operator may abandon his all operations, and The 0" is the mast restrictive, of the all now development con be nanstrmted an the sufftesi it permits wells end other seta. The loss of any oaf the remaining drill all-releted a pipment, including those which sites and the lose of they other oll operation nriapt be used In an arrha v*d recovery sites, particularly In some parts of the ptoiect. It *!!Over then rerdrilling of existing Townlat, eouid potentiefly proclude a future welds. leas doss %K *Uow any rrsw wattle to enhanced recavery project. be drWW i. We ptrir'm 4ml purpose of this Ou fiat Is to 1111+ow existing walls and !fie Ttwwjgh its land use regulations the City !rinds of aetivitles wfilch could be reasonably can go beyond simply accamodating expected in association with three we Us. enhanced recovery projects now, and help to This Is the dersigraetion an nnast of the all keep altes available for such use In the erpeerstion sitas tonainkg in the futures. Strategies far achieving this we Townlot/Downtown ever. They am shown In discussed in the following sections. blest in p'igt:rs 5.5. d.2 tWON to Fes' Preset" Existing The "061" de�nstlatr ellow�s all the uses permitted wWw the 0 suffix, but also allows now wets to be drillod. trill sites 2 Any enhanced recovery project will require the x* 5 in ir'igurb SJ are dealVwted 0-1. a significant nuntes of now wells. The 00-20 suffix allows the asaw uass as The existing drill sites are large enough 0-It but applies to eU operation sites 37 r ^t7W. r 1 �fxy �y :. to accoserrrrodats the anticipated rwrMer of Permit only haw usetr which do not wells and om distributed over the all xones carver the chill site (or parts of the drill in such a way that most of the strata con be sits) extensively with permanent rescind by direrctlonelly drilled walls. Thus, atructure& Those uses might include protection of these existing dri11 sites is carrimercial roareation trrUities such probs►bly highest priority for kespbV open as "ministum golf," cr other the option of a � t ovary commercial astablishmants Uke► gardan project. The followinq strotogles mutt help supply outlets, or selfwerve gas to protest than sites stations. Such uses would have to bs reasonably taaslblar eonsidering their Charm- to m desimitlen r then I than location and spplropriata considering a rIf UN oxlKft ban Sam were other nearby uses. rtmovA and the► 0-1 suffix were to baoterw the lava iota tat lire site, than a developer The City might aloo establish regular review would neexl to come to the City for ua periods after which the owner nr developer dw ngs befam now uses could be Mould request a ire-evaluation of the site far motruetsd are the drill sits. Before the on enhanced recovery project. It the City sonar change would be permitted, the determined that on enhanced recovery Plannkv Commlrslon and City Council pro*t was no longer practical or that the would have to approve the zone change and site was no longer important for the success the now use. The City might require one or of such a project* the restrictions on the use, ell of the fallowing before allowing new uses of the surface could be removed. an the drill site: Cho2M.Gsneral plan desi tion on all drill An analysis by a petroleum engineer sites to rsa me ct on rather Owwlrkg whether an enhanced recovery Important Q or reg�u a Ing land uses project In the Townlot ores Is bealdes awning it the Cityls Owwral Plan. unpractical or not. It such x project is - still pasaibl% the analysis dmid The tienerai flan indica Ws, in general Indicate whether the drill site in teams, that kinds of uses which we nuestion is necessary for such a appropriate In different parts of the City. - project. The oralysis ahouid also For sxa.-Mle, drill alto d1 In Figurer 54 is Indlc►ste if M ly p"Ort of the surface ores ".urrent ly designated "rraourc* production." in the drill sits is essential to ouch a This reams that activities related to oil project. extraction are the mast appropriates ones In this arse during the Manning period" (which fteteentlon of pert of the drW site is ua oily 20 yesra . Before outer uteri aurfscw as open spares, avallable tar would be parrnitted there, the developer futures all operations This open surface would trove to obtain a General Man arcs should be large emough to recut only amendment from the City. Drill site d2 Is aaco nmadste they equipment ramm very deutignoted "plwmd derveiopment" and drill for the ardweerd recovery project, but sites 0-5 we In residential designations. If also any buffers walla, saraans and them sites more also dwnged to "resr;urce sword-proCfing br+'riars wood to ptotect pr &-1 tion" than oil extraction would be the the nearby use; fmM troy *&arm principal perrnitttd use, and a General Flan lintparcts related w that future oll atmendment would be necessary before new operations. Thews ipen spear could be uws would be allowed. kworporet6d Into th- dosages of the now dervOopmat t and usec for such things oR The# advantage of requiring a Generewl Plar- recrsaticr facilities or gardens, se long omwWrrrsrnt rather than s tone change is so there were a clear undentatnding that the former usually ontalle a much more that such arras might also tM used for extensive review by the QtyV staff and oil operations at a future doter* polley-mekarrs. 30 'This itright ensure that considerations like A dissdvbmage to this approach Is that It + `future remVery projects Will be Mc-re adds, (almrtt lltorally� 0 new layer of City completely analyzad before chwig r am LwW use restrictloin , !n addition to ww pwmltto& The kinds of roabrlcti•• that existing Gwwrol P1►. or;d zoning be placed an the site by ttie City ordinancess, Now review pr+ocesdu ms would before allowing raw usim would be the same need to ba developed in order to Implement as in Us acne dwge cases dlswuswd abovn. this 1pprowh* The advenntsge of the overlay HWW, J the RNW anises for the detalled Is that Itt emphosixes the lmpoMr'.ce of review which would be requirad in that come protecting was* for enhanced recovery an alrsrrdy aetablislrad fur General plan ptoje+cts grid it helper to focus the analysin of telwldra0— but we n-rt norms oxerebw new uses on the ft tofted recovery issuer ark awtently ,at lobe Jon"L rot other pwWwrs! onew A dd --"-rantmp Ie that the Geneml Plan 6.3 Preservin Getter C1i1 emotion Sites tw►iwmly does trot usually differentiate land Tw'wd Win�Tie�1`'cw Tot use categorise an wmw smaller than 21D earns. 'Trtee intent of the Can wral Plan Is to The City rrnay want to consider aoplyleg the Wiest* "norel urea for volotively Jorge strategies discussed above to the other ate stem in the City, leaving mom detailed operation sites in the Townlot/Downttrwr', reatrictionm are a gins-by-site bairis to zoning wao whkdt we currently zowol 0. Sorne of ordirdnaso A significant exception to this these s1 too could , be itnptstsnt to a Is rho cisstsr! zom# where land cos crarrnprshenslve enhanood tocovery project, da tkm have been applied to sites much Many of these situ, however, are very small snne ea thm 20 acres becsum of On special and very close to other uses. The minia"ro im ratow ras associated with the tinst vAich surfsca acaa rnecesaary to accornrn A*te a j nWin wrote detailed planning, raven at the drilling rig racarntrw►Wed by numerous all Gores W Plari level, Drill sites 01, y, 4, and companies and well drilling conVen►es Is S 4s6 In the coastal zoms ao this klM of approximately 100 by 200 feet.* Sites � gw1fleity in fiche lard +use dasignataerr would which are smaller then this mink m r►ay not be unprecedented. not be sporopriate far future re-drillinn and, thus, might be excluded fmm consideration OV!Elln MW corditlomlr,so pwonitst in a future w.,arnced recovery project, AncUM ;UM by Wh tah the City could hWp ps MMt, mortar:* arose for futons an aA Permitting blew Wills in the Townlot esporatlarrs would be thrrouo an "overlay" ...�+...■...■.� and a ew wIthme ues , permit. The City Besides protecting the existing drill sites emid irdicate drat the TownJ*/Dm ntown and some e f the larger O-zoned siites, the area is a special resource production district City might ales consider allowing new wells by a gonan l *overlay" designou'on. Before In the Townlot. if the raw wails wars part certain aftss in the overlay district could be of a unitization and conneolldstion programs used for sativitlae rorthee then oli operstion% blew wells outside on existing drill silts may the developw would be aequ+red to apply for be knoortan,4 to own wt wwed recovery sued rocalr a coWltloeral use permit +- that Is, a potingt olloring new wool but only after a City review curd analysis, No only if any conditlons platted on the new um by the My wo accepted by the developer. Tholes * Doom lnq staff contacrsd the fol•"owing conditions cared inckmb the ennharm:ed comVanies: C�evron, Arnim,11 and o very analysis and nmervatien of open California Production Services, so well space whkb were dh aswAW in rhos acne oar the 000. chwtp option above. 39 a. r project if existing wells cannot be rrdrilled "he earn of this p,*aicy is to prttnct &A o: If there are Pimply insufficient existing enhance the visual and recreational wcll� to rrrnplete the injection patterns. amenities afforded by the beach Mille P,I:-w yells Cocold only be permitted If they permitting oil activities which must be p p �] imEet the following criteriat 1) the eite Is locaterd there. in view of this approach, Iarg&r than a minim:im siz3; 2) rnitigations eeservation of Bolas Chico Bench far future of any potential adverse Impacts are ntl facilities appear* inappmpriete, i incoi+porxtnd into the project; and 71, the Fiowever, If thew facilitin-i essential to the �t neF.- well is part of on overall unitization or recovery of the oU deposits underneath the consolidation progrem. implementing Townlot could not be sited any where e1w., strategies It-elude developing a new zoning then the City may still permit ttkise ordiihence or utilizing an overlay district facilities :o be located on the beach if all of with s conditional-use permii requirement, the conditions Meted above are met. similar to the strategies discussed in Section However, becoum this is a State beach, the, 6•2. California D!-partment of perks and Recreation ,-+ould slao have to give its 6.5 Othar Possibilities for Drill permission before new, wells could be drilled. Besides the drill sites discussed above, there Of fshore L.ocat lyre: Anther possible are other poi—iblifiies whldn should be location or o ecillties needed In an discussed, enhanced recovery project is offshore. Sol= Chico State Beige-: Pert of Bolas In this case, preserving rwrface locations in ca State as ies acron Pacific Coast the Townlot itself would not be irnportant, Highway ail" a large section of the although some onshore sites might be Townlotll`.i~owntowrn area. Several wells and necessary to tap the more IN' nd related equipment are active In this area extremities of the oil pools. -Neils and which is cs,srrently stoned O. Wells related equipment can be located on directionally drilled inland fmn this strip offshore platforms, mom-masdev islands or could cover a large part of the Townlot and piers extending from the shore. Because coulc be vary useful in a comprshansive these wells would be reaching inland, they enhanced recovery project. A serious would be located as cloaa as possibly to the prom',im with, using this area for more shore. Thus, a pier would be the most likely Intensive ail "rations Is the conflict facility used if an offshore location were between than activities and the areas use dhosen. as a heavily-visited, public recreation facility. In light of the high priority In the T •3 disadvantages of using a pier for :ill Coastal Act given to public recreation along fs+c Uitioe Include the following: 1) rick of the shoreline, the Citys LCP includes spills which could adversely affect the policies which in.-ourage the Voss-out" of rsctreation beeches, 2) degradation of visual wells on Bolas CMca Beach. Flew wells are resource a anociete►d with the ohorellne, S) not prohibited from locating an the beach, conflict between industrial and recreeticnal but can only be sited theta if ail the uses of the starefine and 4) conflicts following erudition are met: between rnobile, portable oil equipment end rather traffic. 1) The resrources ass not recoverable from any other onshore ' location or existing Advantages of udiV a pier include the platfnrml x) the site is hnproved to becorm followirngs 1) voluable: surface errors onshore m-yVatible with recreation users of the could b+i freed for other uses, and 2) the pier bosah t) publk haerlth, aafety and w,. nMere could be designed to wcommodate public are not Jeopardized, 4) advem recreation facilities such at "lohing woes erwlrorrmental imparts ate mitigated to the and lock-wta, &W On private sector vruuld rneexMrxem extent feasible, 5) the net overall probably be will!,-q to finance the entire -mart of ail production facilities an visual proposal. The pier would have try be VOMM&CM k hnprovad, and 6) safe octerso to detlyned to reduce any conflicts twAweten the bench is pmwIda& the oil wtivities and the public mcrestlorn facaities. 40 yd E p , r r i Park �} Gad Vop / ID r _ a raUU ry M., m mnn Savior Center LJLJ �-, bile cve Parr � ' t � eLJL l Motel a r - Lease, � scia2 i ....�...,....�.�, � Vic:cln t - .`.! Lease, COmercial lu •�. Public Beach"�'��.r Pier Aft Figure 6.1 city-O"ned .ties in Towniot nto". r Sorace: Huntington Beach Pj kig L7ivision.hMtkVton beoch � - r. - Irg dvision _ I airs n' , i w 'itoa Gity% plsr►nkiq and =onIrq jtnrlsdictlon 6.6 Air Possible Actions does not s) 'trod beyond the n-wen high tide line. The State Land Commission regulates+ There am other kinds of actions related t dave,apn*nt in this area. Thus, the City protecting surface areas which the City can only discourage or encourage offshore should consider. First, the C;ty may went devaimpment, but cannot regulate ouch to hire a pmfeselonal petroleum engineer to -development direc:t!y. arm)yze the possibility of unitization and enhanced recovery in the CItZ.owml_ Prop: Another option for Townlat/Downtown matte completely befnre presory re nil sus a areas for future all enacting taming ord;ryances or other land uas facilities Is for tta City to retain properties restrictions. Such a rstw"y rney establish k owns itself and to restrict Uses an the roore exactly the UksaVk'snd of such a surface or.parts of the surface. Figure 6.1 projecto as well as Its surface area shown the City-owned properties In surd near cuequireer•,ronto. This In tern could allow for the 7ownlot/Downtown sod Indicates the the development of more precise reyulatium. uses currently * !oceted an each. The knplemantation oppraach would be to Omit Swondiy, on anelybis of the remainder of structures to that sectlom of these they City may be heipfu; to locales ot�.er properties are preserved santIJ such time parts of the field whore unitization and that an enhanced recovery project Is srrnhanced recovery projects are passible and propueed. The City would then sell or lease where protection atratagies Amllar to those the &&face ohm to the unit proposing the discussed ror the Townlot might bo pro) to The City could still use these appropriate. praportles until that time for facilities like R perks at Wkksq lots which leave large parts ! of the ousted free of pormanent structures. The City would periGdically . review the properties reserved for potential cnr w ced recovery projects to determine if such projects are still possible -and it Wtiewler properties would be knportant for the projects. 42 r 7.0 Conebalon Fes the forenable Nturs, energy sources r- The City% principal role in this issue is to erne espscls!iy cH — wiU continua+ to be control land uses so that enough surface • 1110rL-slena11 more eempensive. New area is preserved until these technologies techmlagleb will also continue to be can be opplied or until it is clear thwt dslvslrpie� tiD help increase energy suppUas. replication of those technologies is • !n i',1ght of this situation, oil remaining in the: impractical. More direct actions which Vow& 1 after primary production which may would encourage unitization and the uss of be er treerrd by now teatarnlogy In a very enhanced recovery rnethods are nxn wtluebli natural resource, sppropr'.-mtely within the jurisdicUans cf State end federal governments. The City This ?wort shows that the strauld moultor policy and legislative TownictOw ntown was of Huntington deevelopownts at these levels of government Minh OW rawer so such oil resources. 1t related to unitization and enhanced min dlMAN0-50-01 strategies for prcrecting recovery, as Moil as to dsvelopm mtrs In the st,erfsts writs era eery for iceew to those oil industry itself, to better datermIne If tb$*WM in the few of encroschirg such programs are likely in Huntington chore! rr so that raw tachrwlogles may Oftch. by watching ftse developments, as sotrmrlrq► be relied to reeover the wolf as by periodically evaluating the rim InkV air. "flee Chy dwuld consider potential for mw projects its Rmtlengton s baehinQ other artas in the Kmtkgton Beach, the City can continue to promote OvaA oil Irld who" conditicns ere shnilor policies which help to protect send carefully let► OMM in UW Townlot;,ft"ly, where 1 utilize its Important nil resources. lfie~esnit qua title of ow nw still exist in r + a,! beasoat asewullary &W other erNi10-orod meav ery tneum ds have not boon irrd Wolio 2) row eiuvakq Mnt Is Wctiid W9 an the ON field, OWND nib �o Cavar the owfa a to h an ,; dortt i1t Un r4w*aWy extraction r OOWAmt tin trot be e..�eod n at" 43 �µ x w 1 . d NOTES 1. COMOMla Coattail Act of 1976. L CaUfamin Pubbe Resoumos Co&, Division 3; Chapter 3.5. 3. , . 4. HUI, F. L.., Ffteeedir ss Wu.'L-Owp an Urban 01/ and t as Develge ent, 1978. i �ww„w�.w,• J.•,y„..�NMwI I/L�wwlwwl■wwwr,Id�.w I I,.W. 3. 1le"Itbustsv ra. C., errd Alien D. R., 4-funtingfan Beach AU Fuld," Surnrngj of rratiorrs VOL 4491958. S. Ibid. 7. Porter, A. L.., lkedford, W. C., and Allen, D. R., "Southeast Extension of the Townlat Arout" Summary of q rstions, Vol. 419 1953. MuntingLan 5wh Planning Division, "risc of Impacts of OU Operations In HmUngton Seach,'% lM11. I� 9, 4'. APPENDIX A Qumglonmlm vW Cover Latter i i i E E j ` 45 r COKPANY NAME: DE'1114ITKASs Waterfla" A rrwthod for iecre►ulog oil production by Injecting water into ail mones. Uniti ations An agreertwernt ai" z&veral oil aporotors to treat a shared oil pool as `ar;d to produce thiel together in d coordinated wcrr, at if they were a sIrViecorrpony. Unitizotlon Is usually required before a waterflood project can b* wxwt*on In all areas where r.my► operators work the tonne reservoir. 1. Do you think there Is erwtxnhrecoverable ail in the Townlot-Downtown part of -the KAtington Beach Field so that a w0erflood would be ecaswmically profitable (if unitizailam could be achle r 40 Vonr likely Perhaps Very unlike1v Daret knew 2. If you think Ore is axvo Al to rrake umiltixation and waterf loading in the Townlot urn fiUble, do you thirktother ocUstocles can be overcwne so thot such a project b pasiblo in the future? Yes Cn't know 3. Which of the following reasau rja you third: have prevented a waterf loud program from hq*ening In the T~Opt area? Not oncu h oil �MMbW Nei enmo operators wl lliq to loin PrI a controls an oil �OWNWA . UnMig restriction Othrr b. Weald yaw compoW be laterr ied In joining a voluntary unit for the purpose of waterfloodkV? DoWtelyr Interested Maybe Interatod finitely wort Interested 46 � I CITY OF HUNTINGTON BE-ACH P.O. Box 100 01PAR'IMUrrNOWELOPMENTUNVICU CALIFORNIA92648 AtJltls lP DIiflMOry h�Na w* � mew 019fIS c:- •7141 5=4W 1 I lea Un A problem facing oil prodders in urban areas Is the pressure for new development an the owfaw of off ftol& 1• aam aid comt, erclal structures am built rasa active oil opErati afffact areas, froon which raw wells could be drilled orrd new tmhnology muid be triads, are covered over. This pressure for now develop~t an oil fields is eam 1 inly evident in the City of Hmtlngton Bewhq acre the City is cam*mW that pwtentiellly valuable oil reserves may be lost in the future If all fields am oar+r lately f ego wed by dw*laprn*nt. The City tslcmInq Division Is sti*Inq th's potential problem. As part of this study, we am frying to oetermirm if a unitisaticn aid waterfload project Is possible ir% the Townlot and Downtown puts of the City. (This is PO area bounded by Pacific Coast Highway, Pakn Ai,-x ia, Goldermed Street and Lake Street.) Our records show that your company apsrot e a well or wells In this pert of the City, and we would very much appreciate your elnawwring thr gwstiaw an the enclosed sheet. You can just check cuff year answws on 1ha Wit, put It In the anciosad envelope and mop it in a mailbox. If you hove other a omnwnts car ideas about the possibility of a watexficed program In the Town! , or if you hover any questions about the City's study, loose fatl fret to write tto PUNS nirrp Division or simply call Mik: Multari of our staff of 5 S27g. Thank you very much far your help. pity, ftNl% Director ap t of Devaopn ert Servias i /ceIMw 47 k saw .Ik T I 1' • APPENDIX B "Coastal Energy Impact Progr+ m for the City of Huntington Beach," Huntington Bach i Flaming Div Irian, 198n. Enhanced Ou Recovery Potential In the U.51 sea Office of Technology Assmsnt, GIGO, - I..II�i�,�i•1 ,1.1•�� 1,_Wrl�w. .wWYY�r �.I�r•iilYl *Estimate of hiatural Goa reserver -- Huntington Beach," California ttdilroad Commission, 1946. 4-4witington 'Peach OU Field," DOG, SummmorX of Oporst pns, Vol. 44, 1958. %4untington Bosch Oil Field — Old Field Portion," DOG, 4gmrnarlr o�•eratios, Vol. 28, 1942. 4-Nxrtington Beach Oil Field — Southeast Extarrsion of Townlot Areag" DOG, Summary.of %oratione Vol. 41t 1995. E � ON Pre ert�r..V�h:a n Paul ►--airwr 1942. Procrad st Workfte on Urban Oil and Gas Dev,9122mwto F. L. Hill (Editor, DOG and Faftral Energy Administration, ''decant Doveloprnento irw 4mtington D.wach ail Field," DOG, Summary of qg rattans, Vol. " %ftmnt Developments in the "-ar Sands In the Townlot Area, KmUngton Beach," Division of Oil end Gas, Su yr of ;: ratIq Vol. 35, 1949. "Taaw 5w+de in the Townlot Ate of Huntlrrgtorti Beach 011 Field," IOC:, SumMar of Mrstlo'5 Vol. 139 1928. Valuation of Oil Produc_ l�r �Wroiesi California Bcard of Egwlization, 1972. ••..r���iMlll•��f•nr � .I■ 1 , I 1 41 •,`�,. 4 '1�'�1•r � r 1 t. r 1'.M 4 1 r , • t � ' 1 4 • %PARTNEXT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Dhw" �Y. Cdahmo DeIay Irso� fto rt Dlrse and himdpA Author AmbmAL USA Oemrnr USA %Womb DM"of 00 mW Go • #�rtwvn odt�1�r�. word pawalb-pi rrt fiord lr ee- Cowdindar lwrar� Wo1 had �rrn 14► t.'A4o�i ��n�ar t•� Debm� Fipin a+ I'1r�awor n: P II AN Huntington tiro r Beach orgy Series Report #2 Fiscal , Impact of Coil Operations in Huntington Beach t ego *64$9 i ► t�► of Hunt ton Beach V00, 1 # of Devokoment Services Division Mardh, 1981 1 , , • M Moo • a 1 CTV CotmaL roky To -zm—ouw M *Cb--ro t f + . • i slay I 1 i HLWINrt'1ON BEACH ENERGY SERMS REPORT #2 I f FISCAL. IMPACTS (W OIL OPERATIOW IN HIJW tX..7A ON BEACH CITY(W HUNTINGTON BEACH WARYNIEW OF DEYMOPN&ff SERVICES Y; r Y TARLE OF Crt7N` E.14TS PACE 1 , DEF oN oNS 2 i•0 N1 ROIXX 'ION 3 U CURREV7 CITY REVENM AN EXPENDITURES RIFLATE0 TO tad,. RATk" IN E•IliWINGTON BEACH 5 13 carr won 12 3.0 FisCAL IMPACTS OF -i'NUING OP- OPERAWNS 13 3#1 Pragattrog Futum GtS Oporatl" 13 12 Ammrtiwe obaut tlaridWw Affecting R44m Rewenuo ar•d Eyp"It m* 14 30? Analysla of Scwtorlar 25 )A Sumrrory 1 15 GawfJ*ld/ *nwast and T**T4o /D**ntawn Aram 20 40 KYOW FISCAL Ili PACTS 25 461 NO"41S I CW-1 25 4*2 lion-flown! fitj 36 467 F'adral omd La XI Irarimfi an Nom,fiscal Coots OW Bwwf its 26 54 CCH, CUMION 27 APPD0CES .64p dtx Ai' ChtM E,+pmndhvm Mochas 2� Ap.x Mx& P,;v hn3 frarr.Ctlw Enwyir FaaillVots 35 IOTA 38 4( r r Ir `''^a,n „'.,tit.• ., - --- - - -- +W� G A i' Foreword T+�1>r it r�{ +r,';�t�{ ii { s j+Awl ti �li5.t� its 7: �K1Y 1S K.►li "it!ti �•� lt_`klied issues Prepore'l NY F�Idr'rr't+n►�; C}`,�1.,'r�, �,y� El,,, ,`'�E�, � y. ;ir.:cac;J{. WriSingEen Room if rs i-onte-r for rnrfrty a�t�:g���r�rrc;�'�� ��.;i�,���� ' . ���:�.'►����� r�-t,l� r� ��r�,ri rr{�,r.Fx��rr hil E-t��1�ti<:n, r�� "' ` •o. :'t i , S iiif"9 i0'9 ,•'� Irlr l A xofr - arK� -��r' t"vt��<«'t t +n0loglrr-q� "i"he I :�a i `l9 , }7C{14!1' .r 1�•,' i' ,W/t`'i .'.t V" (, 1., t'� ur l of 0* C,it3, ttt the cv) immd prodmticr', of $0 vied ci rttpnh zw (r: qy 1vo, ,%n►u,x firm- roll:��cttir�g i�.� rnut:�, c�3 sihie any averse . irn;�4�t:03s i5M1 t}�iAm c��1Yf7'fi .. 1t 'i !,,� 3i.;zr �t,r:ra ix:`�� iii�s _'tt ii► c.{r, �;�t�ryr rep+arts in this �eriec s,: to O i i R ft gt" es In Ueveloped 03 Oji ti;,111 Csxtting»!'tCy N(Nining ',n Huntingion Beoc h #4 r�-nN3ic*d Oil Rrcowrxy Technology #S Soltv far*d C etrvaiiion Pe)llr:ir-j at 0-P. This pAlic-otion was prepared with financial assistanct from the U.S. Office of Coastal Zone Iwa nswoo nt, t+lvt!onaj 0op nic awl Atmcepherlr- Adminlstratlrn, undar the prarvtsiorc of the Fedora' Cea lt+ao' Zone MwwVm d Act of I M, m amended, and fram the Cal If am)a Caastct ConreisMan wW wr tho provislcww of the Cawtoi Act of 1976. 1 y. rr l Definffions This report rwx*ssivily discusses ao,me• tec'inicol ct�prcts of ilx± ail Industry sand of fiscal impact arxtlysia. C.',:+•,,;,;.quently, tome ter,rr.s cwe used whit+ may not be fomillar to the reader. 'o he fdlawln�, 1efinitimu sac liov was prepared to l*fp clarify itx memv)inq of some of these temm. To twe Werencr' all wepr4i defined In thk sr-:-ficxi are italicized the first time they QPx'CW In the ,°tlport's text. Ergumad Aecgvt r_y: ,may �)roductior. method which to c�.;red to recover m;mor` of[ from a petralaurn rrasenloir th ms ccxtld bo. obtained l y natural reservoir energy car simple hamming. truludes water flood, Mom m rTapd and other technicrues fnvul%nng iraa'ection or fluids into ths reservoir to recaysm additional ofl. 'I E diturss: Monies spent by the City to pros de goods truss swr%dcer to the landowners, residents, workers Ltd vislturx or the City. Fiscal Irr„� m0s: lh this ►sport refer s to r*venuv s -ec. 1ved sand iexpendi?t�s incurred by the city alp a r#adt of pa:rttcxtlar land uses or oct:ivitims r cctarrinp in Huntington Beach. met flurries: rNs roverv(is remofning and awifloWe to Me Cif - after total ogvandlturoa are su twO rc.'rr totol revel emwtwifty Cott.., C'osvp a ousted with choasirlg one option oix!r other ones when that choice precludes the aitirmtavves. by m4hing that chofee, berrel'ite that might have rosulted from the prooWed alOrnatives me lost. Prfrn Pr odurtto": Off d1ven tip f.hrough wells by natural p v&vw+e in the formationor by . p`~ir , wirc+t injwatt water -or other flu!ds tc+ help farce the aril to the surface. Rt It : Jh thts context, re f er3 to the radevelopmeW of tho a4o-f ace ;rev of an off field for uses swh as housing using or commerce. merce. Rewnuos: TM mmnlos �r +some the C#ty receives; ~oas ttnclud'e taxes, frost rents seed 16�s. SOWWk k1 We rrmpOrt, referP to at met of events or canditions posible in the future; a futur* Pi . Uri.. qu 77wr procem of formf% a "Unit"; a unit is are entity campased of arveratl oil Open a" WON ' a common oil pool irm order to shwv equipment mid mfneral irttensts to We&ce tiwr r000rwir as a single p4r-ty. When the Intereerts In the pool art fragmented, units ara a ndat for On use of mist soda wod recavwy methatk which can beat be apialiel cn a cOW'diraatedt eon-mm,peti$ive boss. W Ood-# An tweed recovery program Orough which water to ir4ected Veto a r°eae-otr in of do t+e rapes nt4rre ali rmm the pros in the ruck. Wei�,t99it�n; Anothor tarm for 1°vmterflood". *..w.�i..l...��.., 2 Sr ,w w; y j+ Y15' R 7 1 i 4 , 1.0 Introduction Wmerous energy-related facilities occupy in Huntington Beoch. In odditlan, the City slgnifieant land was In the Clt,, of New lmsxxtcsnt decislarrs regardirV 1po4 Hurr"tan Saad't, especially In and near use as the oil in the field continues to be the wwttal zone. These fachitler Include depleted and preisure incremaes to abamlon onshore and of aU production ptrb of the tlrld *nd to redevelop the operation, a tamer unloading terminal# a surfaca. Fisrjl Impacts -are Important power plant, PlP8'1-)'1as, and electricity MW fo►-tors In determining the best use of the natural gm distrilhUtion systems. All of load and the City's ra164ry toward continued these have f Iso*1 Impacts an tha City. oil o a tiona. In this report, fiscal tmparcts refer to the The "Of ty's other m►ajew energy revantm the City reselves and Eire faciliti{ .the power p ont aW marlme 8*w4ltt It !Acura as • mull of to minal.- re, practically speaking, particular 11" uses. Revs:uwa are the pwm~t focilities which w;II rontirve to tub generated for the City through ON" r*9101161 and state irrtarorsfe. City variouo taxes wW feats (far example, actions are no - likely to significantly property taxes, production taxn and encoura" or discourages continued license fees) paid by the owners and uaars operations of these facilitiau Thus, they of 1wid In the Clty. $,rgeendttte+es are tto der trot present signif leant land use options amanita spent by the City to provide to the City at this time. avvioas for theta land twee (for exnmpls, fire and police protection). This study has been oorried out in conjunctim with the clwelopment of a Its principal picrpow of this study In to City-vrlde put%,( rti 1 which asess*s oretlrn the f10281 impacts of the flMol Imporcts of %4WIG # land UM. a y- els facilities and tally of Whil• the City-wicle model may be useful peeximition owationa. The report for owalyzing mast eWvltiew, It does rat fir Via an o111 opentiv a bacon they take Into account certain pMewlidritiss of am lr a rest deel ofi wry valuable lend oil Owatlaw. 3 j Y :h 1 "Fur 6ROMple, OH reecanues are more elreely Section 3-G pro)ercte the. fiscal impacts of related to the smount of oil produced b,i continuing ale "ratios tferouO 1"0 the wells thane Ve acreago they occupy. four different emnarka . Special Th o City-wide, a-odel, however, ;e largrlly aft0, t :rxl is glvan to thit Towniot/ bayed on deevelope ) acres, sixf generally L)awntcyw,n and Garfleld/ 0,4&owest areas d m trot Watee cnanging mvpnues to wtv �i v�ii slat vs oaf oil operatiane it likely changing productlom levels. Thus, a belt" t,• �c; �. way of computing ttie irnpacU of oll opert,ti" hale Seer, devaloped as part of 5ectim 4.0 discrusees iesLobo hesidto lh5s atuty. (Seep Appendix A), fitiGal i��pasc�s v►rhlcl7 nre also Important fur making decisiom stout I" uses in the The fallowing *cc tian diseLmes ttta C'3z 7evenues and expanditurem related to ail operati .-a In Huntington Bosch fur f ie;vl I I 1 .I T, 1 1 ' it 2.0 Current City Revenues and Expenditures Related to Oil Operations M) Huntington Beach Table 1.1 awmwizes ttw revert m crW 1979-9. Oil activities gwwrat'ed rw o iltu�vs attribitable to coil prodwtion rew ws (revemns exceeded aaats) of In lwl mfin►8ton Seach for fiscal ywr approximately $800,0W for the year. TABLE 2.1 Ciitjnevenues and Expenditures Related to Oil„ I ORara ns Art F 15=170-w-IM-00 Rsww s axes ,,( Ef,�erlera;t rnrnent Orel Oil Peockx9ion and Administration $2030340 Sualross Lim Few 100760 E FA611c Works 135,465 Royolties &W Easements 1200000 Police Department 1 Hon "on 74000 Directir Assignable 149U. 0 1l�asl wrcrter Plrrnits 90660 Net Di,vctly Awl9mbie 1509903 0rIIlitsa,V.e*illlrr8 Fire Department Permits 6t500 Directly Anl9mble 38.309 Phwilne Frowhiae 4AS3 tail Irrspectnr 45,800 and Equipment TOTAL REVEMJES $1,672,477 ndP� 1 210,000 Not Directly Assl ble 87,$16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 870,995 $1 r r47? (Total Rwwem) - $8700933 (Total E4erwdltures) z 4$801 p4Q4 alert Revenue). ROW to Sw"m L2 aW 2.3 far dkowslan and colculatvon of ttwe flipm. 5 i' 'the fallowing section *%plain hair t1wen 011P611lltum NOW tr'evenjes wore estimated. TABLE 7.2 2.1 E,,4 ndltvr*e Distrs5ution O' Fire! Do rrtrno t. Calls Local gov*rnmexnts provide a wide range of .� vital public go- and towvlceet. In 1979-80, Type of for oxomple, the City of HLoitington Beach !.rind Use 0 of Calls (11 % a# Tct al spent over $34 million to provide buslnwaa*a, Indwtry, resl&nts and visitors Residontlai 21937 :4,5 of Huntington Beast, with fine and poll" protection, attrea►ta, sewers, garbage streetl & 1-41r0,wuys 537 6.1 tli4possi, animal control, buNding irrenectlttrrre<r carotKnew p►otacti�►oF anri Ir1+f1)ret.rInl ?69 3.2 marry other important servicos. "fide section discusses the City's expenditures City Sesrh & pier 257 3.0 rol ated to all oper►rat i ons. Commercial 24i7 �.� t3irrteal flat r�ab.rM �.x�renditur�ss A key problem in this kind oo Iscal anslyais Is Gil 51 .6 determining what portion of the octal City budget wl~.auld be sttribute•d to diffesreet City Parks 126 1.5 lend uses. to only a few one" is It relativaly easy to measure► the amount of Miscelisneous 520 6.1 public servirAs provieded dually to certain kilt,% of land uses.. The principal examples Othtr of %have directly assigenah►,le costs acre thane Lk►ersslgr►ed (7) 1 42.0 reiatnd to police and fire calls. The City keeps tecords of the number of ow.h calls, ,CTALS e,525 100.0 eta also rates, among athar dater the land use Imaterd on thrte site of each call. We then *spume that the proportion tat calls~ generated by each land use category Is h rovasamble estimate of the proportion of the City's tDats in raspo nding to all calls (1) Includes all fire, rxrr►wgency/ medice that should be: attributed to each IwW use assistance, and non-fire en type, non-erneergency/medical incic6nts. Table 2.2 shows the distribution of Fire (2) Thm WV etmerrgency/medical Npartmertt calla by lanes uses type. It incidents that uld not be ismigned to indlc*tes that only .6 percent of all calls a particular land snare. were tolated to oll opereatiom The total � d City endlturw an the budget Items Sources City of Huntington Beach Fitr� crlWsd to Fire Department eennargenvy Department and Planning Staff. cmVe ware $4,71 S„24tl In 1.079. Tie Items ettie•et Fir* r,nntrol (account number 3D2)1* and Mm Al Rid Paramedic (304). Considering that diseusainn above, oll uses then should be: eteeatl"d .6 percent of the « parenthesis Indicates the account total, or $29*309. numbers In the City budget for these, Items. r Table M shows the distribution of Police The followIng tx,dget Items were DepartmsrMt Cells rl'nong I" u*atsr It, the conyidered taloted to thr• costs of City. Note tint ell operstlom we not renpondIng to crimirwl octivityr Crime bmken out Into a separate cetagar y; they Analysis (33U), Vier ood Or onized Crime are Includead in the "Industrial" 91aup. Ali (328), In mstigative (329 , Scientific f Industries accounted for only .1' pwcont of lnvestigatican (3:31), Petr©l (337), Troffie police calls. Because there era other 635) ood Aero (337). The City expect irJuArle:s in Huntington Beach beside* oll, $7,190,105 to provide these services in the share of the expense of these services 1979-8. Oil's share, .2 percent of the attributed to oil facilities must be some total, is $140360. frection of .2 parcent4 For the: purposes of this analysis, however, tier. full .2 perrcer," A very large proportion of fire and pallze Is asfsl9rred to tall activities to ansur°e that caller are Included unc3ef "struts and their arhssry Is nol. vndereytlrnstCt�, highways," "miscellarmous" or "unassign+eti" 00te{gcrlas. EnmMitures It, those TAB L E 2.3 categories carw-W be ossigned to spmIfic land uses directly. This Is true for most Distribution of Police L)wrtr ent oflxc City expPndituressr as well. These will carli Fy, . y 0 Lar�d We a twodor be discsassed cKpin below. Another group of City expenditures which of CiVe % of Total can be reasonably assumed to be directly related to oil operotiom are they evstse of Streets & Highways 29,396 40.2 the. oil inspection and regulation activitiese. The City Oil Inspector, who Rersl dent isstii 917 32.7 works In the Fires Depar±ment, enforew the City Oil Ccxie, inspects every well Commercial 313,457 10.4 annually, responds to oil-relate tme:rgenacie s and pe:rforr w other duties C ity l3 ach & Fier 908 1.2 relr red to oli operations. The Fire Chipartrnent estimates that all Inspection City PWkV 446 .5 rots (including Inspector's salary and overtirre, bet-wflts, cm, uniforms and State Psea&) 129 .3 office "port) were opprcximately $45,800 in 1979-80. tnafustrl sl 125 .7 (Ir+Cl60Mg oil) Finally, bm-cause there: Is a potential petroleum fire hazard associated with the hAbaellsneous 4L717 6.5 oil prodmtIon fwIlities, pipellnsesz aM tank ferns in Huntington Beach, the Fire •Ir0TAI_S 730005 10 M. Eo: c rtment has ms a miner company that is specially trained end *Wlpped to handle oil fire,. If riot for its all field a44w#iblllty►, the Fire Department would not maintain this company. Therefore, the cost of this Source; City of Huntington ReaO Police protection, estimated at $210,000 for Depertmerlt arsd Planning Staff. 1979-.Wp Is a�ded to City expendifuron on oil a ctivif le s . 1 i I �y 6!" w rr..rrtire�ra..r�� 140 Diroolt Assi le Enndltvresl TABLE 2•4 Met *M4ndltures wmot be directly �,,' asignod to particviar land uses. Many o Dl'4rit ,tier+ of ('ants . time reprewt the City's "A►re�erhoce, or fji.i.i We•icI�,tra�erg2e Mode I the oast of having servitors wail obl e, "Ad they be needed. Fconr, m,'Et Ge.-m9e of Total Patterson helps clarify this point; Expenditures ` of Acreage Assigned by ". .the basic purpeae of •� fire: In ,";?y Model department is protection, which is wailable to all whether or not they Residentioi 65% 87.3% octuaslly have a fire, It is mot INIcal to assurne that a fire departrnenL N C:xnrnercial. 9% 5.2% pold only when it N f!ght!ng a firr " lndistritrl 6% 2.39b Thus, while expenditures an fioting firos can be reasonably arttriiauted to different Oil 3% 23% users, the costs of twing the equipment aM personnel ready to fight any fire cre Vacant .�17% 2 not, Iv" are borne by all members of the c x"Munity. Total 1 6 100,10% The City leas developed tin expenditure rnadei as part of the preparation of this nel,wt for estimatirvy 11, a "fair share" of these costs that can be redly In 1979-80, expenditures an bAet items tart?ributed to dif'ffcent kinds of land uses, which cart of be directly traced to specific A detallad discussion of this n-Wel and of i&A umm totaled $24,982,308.* Oil's shave aitarnotives them were extrnlrwd by the o; this, 2.3 percent, equals $572,523. City for this study is Included In Appo-Wix Table 2.5 lists all the budget Items A. A brief &Lr:eirwry of the mWel ancb its lnclixW in this analysis. C"Umptiou follcwm •, : 2.2 Revenuers The ►oadel takes Into account seyfwal ` foctors In assigning the aWoprlctte sharreM Oil operations generate significant of City ompenditucas to different larW asses, reve+rms for the City frorn a nuri*er of InclWing the amxwnt of acreWeg in the sources, Including the following: City woch i" use type occupies card f h--� intwolty of we sari that acreage (that Is, the rR0160 of real businesses or oil farci1,111es per c>rrre). The cesurrrptlen a Library, Parks dr Recreation, and utilized In tier model Is that more hi,arbors and Beaches are not included irrtensivelyr 6weloped areas tend to reWre In the analysis bwovsre these three wrote seerWe" (ond, thus rwee grips of sarvicss are attributed e>pwvfitums) per' we then less dweely pr on xirily to residential users &A are e eveie ed oreas. This vW*M , coiled the rot considered in the calciolat1wo of 1 oii� er�ati� i WidW �or abaa,it�� expenditures ottributable to all - cp*ratiorts. water Depeslrtment petrewd of the City's budpt (for itw ns enperrultures land rewwmes from wester *high central be Oractl traced to specific sales a m also excluded, beresaa oil I ums). Sere Iv ble 21 octivities c nsimm relatively srnoil +qmrtitlees of wateer wW the estirmtod reverum are not kpwtont to this esralysts. h i PM E (less city COWWO. Me) Dwoolorment services Aft. (sue) Aftifflstration tin (231) Cfrrea: Pl&anteq (3311 Ganerak art ties) Ocala 11MINOUG" 12121 Advams Plann' (3221 gersomel fin) City lliisisttater (233? Land Us* (32:'. Pv611c Aftsirs (us! MUM, mat= (234) Plan Reweiw 1324) Records fill) 1aftia and fsseareb (325) Tra#Aiiq 4112) COMMI 1 sa fgar t (3 2i) Research 1113) Public Informatlim Pubile Marks (333) Cae�a�,iestf , 1114 st4011— 6z Pi4/1q M t (ILLS) civil Defeess (410) Administration Pare pipirtmant * ins) Qsts lt+oosssia4 1412) surging 13121 P*wcWwtsq (415) Traffic Z"Irsera.f,g 0") X-Imirisustion 4110 1 Services 1420 Mintananea Awfnistratie" 1101) rt-s Prevent.," (ll!) nor( lrnewalmi!' C430) Msebanical 1lsintemmmm (3e4) Joint laws" (lam) C aftler (412) Vabiatilk Ywrair 1415; Firs static (121) fish laasa4aake nt fs") Sgw-j: "aiatsnan<� 1122) fwiwa L Lianas S 5sl) (591) Somr Pump station u3s) City Attarm y 4431) Machanleal Fabelest£on - ALw immudss awe= ce 41491 City Clark (4331 Pool Car WainteaBrjes aeaige"s' iILIm attri-- 41141) flerticfes (4S3) special Repairs mdod m Qstrmw aril ;t • na QM persael 4430, MMUCOlimmVas and 4170) lias�atq 4", Aofsr to 2l6,1r 2.2 �� 4131) FACOMtimt 470, ti?2) fnalaw Lids lsa, waintesanee 482, 487, 439, 490) Svsr{s for 13 i&- !i �nsx sl•3nsd �e _ it�rs+e General &.-rermw*r.t 33.sw,m Pu53ic perks e,M-762 Police 6'3is.m t.fraf 3,i�f,i�a TABLE 2.5 +r1. rl 1) property taxes (Irvludirrq tax rn s+r►rfnce of cn nil fi�ild or oil rKrr•cel Is +ca.—* lr ecf III orseas, mirwirol rights cy)d improvernenti), 21, (Ose for oil production, cno how munch could busi rwas license and coil prodm:i i nn li come: reasonobl y to c omi dered vocont and Nei, 3) hupection fees, 4) pipelirw avoiloble fcw• other uses. In many cases, o fronewhises, S) wasttwate•r p(,rrnit I'mi? 6) pvwcel 1'.1 V) densely prP.11at'rd with wrllx drIN4I jrec*,I1ling permit fens and 7) cruel lunEts t`►at the entire area can be royalties and easemmits.'# considered oil production larxi. In other !nstnrtces, txnvewer, open spacer between Property Taxs The CI+yi property tnx vr,.-lis cm•e forge anough to permit revenues are primarily dependent nrr three rleva�lopm-,mot of other uses. For example, key vcsr;ables, I) tiv assessment or It w,x)lei f�e u nrcasonat)le to think of :a valuation of properly in the City, 2) 0" ten-ocre parcel with three oil wells can It os tax rate applied to tlxAe valuarlcxks or devoted e-ntire:iy to oil. Vae.ant pastians of assessments, and 3) the percentage of the -.Lich a pot-col could be developed for other total prcpertf taxes collected in uses. This has happened in areas Humlingtam O3each whfrh rr_tuaiIy go to the throughwc>ut the City. City. In order to accurately estimate the surface P'rop©sitlen 13 "+rolle"ocW, property orera of the. City used for oil activities, this valuations to 1975 levels and lirnit4 characteristics of the oil fields and parcels re-assessment to two percent per yevr. in the: City were analyzed to determine If However, If a property is sold, It Is the land around tlx- wells and tanks could re-assessed at that time at its selling to developed fcw other uses. Those areas prices. !Awmraily, be:,couse of the two which cadet be considered available for percent anmool limit, valvatiLvu do Mwt other uses, wer-. mm!ed cxs vacant land. keep pace with Inflation. Tiwe frequency (it The remaininq partions of all fields and which properties "turn►-over" (are sold), ar►;1 p-r eels were counted ors oil arms. Thrtxrgh thus are t"ssessed, greatly Offeots hOW this process, staff "tirnated that about closely the overall valvatian for properties 472 acres ara wtually used for oil cm keep papa wifh Inflatiars.4 production In Huntington Seoch. The estirnated as"_ssed v;rlve of that. surface Proposition 13 generally fit-nits properly area for 1979-SCI Is $4,901,666 (See Table tax rates to cww percent of market vole-.. 2.6). Voters in wy tax rate: area can app.n.vo odditional tares beyond this base rate. Besides the surface land, property iaxees Table Zd below shows they distribution of are also cuse•ssed an mineral rights, secured oil holdings, ornang tax Irate areas, the rates Improvements,nts, and unsecured for eoch crea cmd the tax collected by tl* Improvements. The amessrnents can each of County, these in }979-80 were -tie following: $23,788,080 for mineral rights; $9 227460 Many jurisdictitwu uthtr than the City for soured Improvements; and 4701:160 (such as the school districts) are also for unsecun•ed Improvements. funded by property ?axes. Thus, onlry a fr+octi,n of the tonal property taxes The City recelvea a 20.7 percent share of collected In Huntington Bach actually go the total property tares can oil operotiam ?a the C h• . The sho:a of the property in Huntington Beoch oa 1lec:ted by the #axes Alch word to the City was 20.7 Catr,ty which arnou�nte d to $387,068 f.+r percent in 1979-81). 19'9'-Me-S The -cute difficult prablern In estimating Bosinesrs License and 01; Production Ow ty% pnnwly tax revenues related to MiWe" Fee: e o pr an fee s 0oil is daterrt inirrq how much surface area for each barrel of oil ` produced. It is linkesd to the �o ram. _3M Valto of CHI Ps=ttom in I°#Ud '-- Ti Rags 4.+4na-ra1 secured Lkswured Tax 3'w An* L&--1y Right 1npivmments JOWa U TotiJ Rabe Ca ted am 4 Z33 ? 20 33v= 9.9 4 280 4.957 1 p M 34 4G.927 4.776 7% LW2363 007 2",741 66 490 1.4au M7 9360 289,732 4.8309% 13 r99? 010 47l0*3 228j350 13,176 9p450 MID 4.8426% 14,Avy a Ql3 & WA M j2a4 zllftovom V719M ?A,3M 3,6" 4.7$84% 1769673 TOWS 40CUA66 7.3l789XG 9g27,480 7019,160 38,616,386 1,845-r74C L" wxfwe wm dbtribated among tnK rota aeas in the nrtw propora iam as miner-al rights. Source: C*ange Cry AnesK a Office. Adft TARX 2.6 hwtlngt h planning division wo nsr price index, and, thus. increases (Some 4t.olirms ore `elated to oil as the t of i1YIN risex. Tie a ixrxfiratian here - th<n i. eves if there production lice fee rates fat I974 .01) were r►) oil f,1oH.KflL -. ir< i ; ►1ington were 11.050crrtel for 'Irm-stripper" wells these pipe'llnes would coon:lnur to be used. (welis that proxwc more tl►o , ten borretils They are ined for trartir piwtirog crude ail per doyl and 8,84e,,/barrel for "ntripper" 6-olivered by inner or ftr carrying gas or wells wells that produce. less thin 10 refined produc:ts.l hearrerls peer doy). Each off operator also pays an ar all $ID0 business licenze fee Rn al•rll.-s and Ensernent; As ra tesult of per well. eg1 atTon Tri-tVk j s, the City receives royalty payments from the sales of off Thee oil ptocltxtic' fee tt �Mrt ;e -,dot eJ ui c�Jfs'xrj 3: iau►se Public sand the "rotor may deduct up to $75 per Resources Ccxe 392. The royalty Is eqe.miw as reirnbursornent for the Ilcesrue nWroximately .25 percent of those salsa, fees, In other wards, Ov first $75 of the crud therefore, contirogent on oil prices crud quo"arly oil presckvIlan fee Is paid In tho rrnwoint prodt,ced - two variables that advance, In the form of a business license ore very difficUlt he edict., in 1979-80, fee. The total revenue collected f this the. �C'It re .*.II Vrd M0,OCA3 from this source wets $10076,"S for 1975-80,a sours,l Oil Well t lLmtlon Fee: Eoto oh well ix 2.3 Cm)cluslm rtspe�c Barr +a y or c omp I i once with t tm, Huntingtarti Sew.-h Oil Code. This oil The opelPsis for 1979-80 Indicates that rail irep►sctnr must approve each well before a proekxtion contributes significant revenues business license is Issued. There is o $30 to the City, totolirng approximately $1.67 � Inspection fee per well. Total revenue million. Approximately twothirds of these from all well Inopftfir-is was $73,000 for revenues ewne from the oil pr+odwtion fee 1979-gyp. (per barrel) which Is tied directly to product Io n. This fee alto increosees Wastewater P'eerrnit.a Every well that uses rarrwally with an Index of the Inflation t T s v�aet erw�c-'ien system must pay an rate; thus, this revenue worce can keep artrrual 30 wastewater fore. There are 322 pace to a signi f Ic:ant degree with rising wells using the system, Total rovenveet expenditt-,e burls. w*ref $9,"0 for 1979-M.1 The estimoted City expenditures related to DrIlil ��,tlrMI Permits: in order to oil pro&tctian for 1979-80 were alf w-re*111 an all well, an olwator must cipproximately $.87 million. Thre* severe ea permit from the oil Intpeector, departments—fire, police cwW public Ths* Is a $S00 fee for each permit works—mint fo• about two-thirds of q*rovact. In 1979-80, 13 these; expenditures by all other pormits w1we isswd, go wating a revenue dep.7wtments ewrnbined for the remeirting of SSAMN one third of the Total. 1;,ia Ilne FrixuAlsm tail cmxveponiees that Clearly, oil production eactiwties currently p pa Tres Hontington Bauch pay generate net revenues to the City. The framchtae testae: whwee trestess art ertte*!1sheed next section awlyrees how this fiscal by oontcvots with Ow City. The ftwmoi of situation might rhanp In the Aiturea, the eronttwte wy fmm frorMchise to earold rirng variables: such as changing frareohfoe. Remus Remum from this ee7rwai wort production levels, Inflatfon, sand pressures $t 253 for M91-f0 for tsipeellnm dractly to Pk6welop the oil fields to new um. IestS to emit production In Hurttingun 12 �� TZ 1j r' r Itr� "Vp,jm 0 r , .0 Hai kmacts of Continuing 01 Operationi EsUrnat" of the final Impacts of In light of 4hsse dwngtng varlabla and cattinued oil matrlvlges in Wuntingtm different po xibilltiao, several "soonarlas" 1 B000h cbpwW lawgeely on the predicted of all operatiom over the next dude have tuot a of Oms sotivltiesr. This awn he a bwen analyzed. Ths fleet sown-is, overall, problo n beopm manor varlables important that the number of wells, +acreage, and to, a file W rralysis, such +era the number of production levels rsmein relatively • bervels produmd, the nrmrbar of wells, the unchanged, This could ca me +about if tier &* ad naroags days*ed to oa fecilitlers *rd dbclirra of production in scene petts of tno the inflation rate, am difficult to foresee, field are balanced by new waterflwd protects and rather omhanW howvwy ftMgWg Future Oil ggar�ratiorr programs. Prroductlon wog rmall Inclepandernto Is rwtrmed to continue Ve lack of rwElrble apon Mace In this &opping, but the "rsroyciimf of Varir afae r �d the growInq busing shortage parcels to raw uses would procfeetd very j,,i* ee* w abardm all fields wW to sreswly, leergoly dine to this IneressIrq price fear houeeir* At the sum of oil. Thwo the nrmb er of wells, acre, tie wp r!Wq elegy prima srW the refaxertion of and overall all production would ftm efrr prionr "or* an 41arnestir OR make relatively Cortists"t for this rwxg i`&V Yvan, Co1*M4W of ptr n, wvan at low 10014, aserirtgl y o ttrative s lifer Pric as way giro "Oke mom OWWWV4 eery tjirr Qfts Owh as vrr4rL + Two other reports in this awls* are I pMJ100ble 1n paw of the field MOO relawsnt to they elism"14rn ..14 ` hove r►tet lA boon aappllerl, new trcfrrraloglow Report ri g' ,� �UUn 1n tho 010marvinq d►orfrrs Amass to flold ho bmh doctllnlrrq, Uhd*rVrmmd ON Reseervto tit ' W U here 0 vafodrd �]e �v n �0 ti W',wMri no Norte tbe-w" nh errva v y o�qi 1 13 1 M i6. 1 ' IJ a 'the second seen-aria env isicor s o grodl"I l iertttd tsp d phos"it of oil operalir,.%7t In IN, Tcownlo-* Araeox,11 a,,vv 7eq this "Ill iiiry n dlei niI. and Downtown dui it iy 0* 1 fi 30't, twat cperot)coi elsewhere In the City c:,vtsWrxA befofp. -h of thewe st-00or°ics, mlatNmly unchmoge d. Fels wus droll xed &N-ne a,131?r,•ptions at-out i hw revenues and b+lv:'ti" ;st tip +ownlot %xhl Do*ntr„wn at", will OAtrlglt -:liver iimt 00 ld are eswially V ,,1► able paru of 0.e• City, be rrvie-4,o ,;. and pressures for redevelopmenl there w+ii; be strts»syer them elsewhere. Aso, wlih ilx '►�� `�s, ,.,-,,�;i •,�uhcwt Variable .tire c�vtpirtiCsr► of On ► r` r �'�at ir`r: ai~rs an f�u-cre�s durIN the earlypor-, rf the 6-,rc�c�, oo ..._.. .,..._ .. ... ...._.__..,._.X dormant efforts to dv"iop ondi rr.Awe:lop Severa+i msump7ii•Aw abmf some key tiv3t aren shtwid intensify. vsarlabl&A o',feecting future revenues " e xperneiitvrm have be^--i mane In this 'The third scornrio sees a ohase-4xpt of the (axtlysls. small-ocale Indeper-lent operations daring tree next decal, while the nvior oil First of sill, Proposition I.-Is limits can the compinI& c intinw. operating hear t-.ei; propetiy ta!� rate aid propetr-Ty value pre-serif iftmis. In moony ways, thi:e scea'taric Msessrnent are c°asurned te1 remain In rrtay best approximate whot will actually effac:l. We also cs;;,rrne that mot oil r happen, Discusstorn with the major oii IKopieb-tiwc that re►mnin protA,ctive will no' ownparias In Hvnti►rogton tech ind;cate charms r;wrwrs, thus 'Olrrriting re-messmexnt I that they *xpect to owtinue operating ct of the sw-focea areas to tnnual lne:reases of least another 20 years, arvJ that the two porcent per your. (See Section 2.3 applicnflon of "hafted re evvlery above.) -`Fro Clt)es Ohre of overall tochnologieas may not dramatically Increase pr*Wty tax re v*nues collected In promotion, but will offset recent de0ines "i nticngion Beach was assumed to remann arrd kerep productlan levels up fcw sower►ai appraaelrnextely 20.7 percent. rem, At the sea tie lkne, the prcKki;f lcr, of the Independents has cmitimsed Cc, E:harnges fro tax° csncw,;nts Ot rged for Gemrally spooking, they cannot ripply the &Illing, irapection and waste water eOwwceed recovery tec_twlogies twilable pe►rmN were not Incorporated ?:ito the .a the larger comp:nies. As their analysts beecautie these fomm mcount for productlam drops a d the volt* of the only r, small peercentoge of total arssuol eurfam for housing eoi.4.1 ntes to rise, these retve►t.res• parcets would grridrrcFlly wtycls. tiro the eexpnditure side,, the costs to the T1 a last sceitrmzio eiders the possiblitty City+ for providing seervic" to futures ohs #heat, rather than abandoning their opm-atiarts will be c function of how much eawcatia o On small IrAepent"Ont oil of the IcM remain In oil produc4lon, the aoerrpanfu inn the Townlot, cd wiwh a* mirnbebr of *elks and related foellitles to be or more of the rrtajorst join together snot served, the level of sk�rvice to be preavided, form a "unit.w Ely ownbining the ressetntm and the Inflation rote, In the following of all the partlelmts, the unit hem the awlysis, the lewi of service is anvmed to csoplfW and the surfom o "O; to apply revnatn mwwtent; owwoqLontly, total City waterflaod and other esrrleancesd rp-c�oyeery eery.-lditures are assurned io Incre mee tft4Wqu &. T%^ prad►rctlon Increases and evording to the Inflation rate &W the that esperatlexs c+arrtlnue throu~ tier City's o+wall growth pattern. in the I . Report o1 to th!s series, foollowing analysts, total City eXPV dit s "Prwei*wfrq WOM Ae�:ess to ear the next ton years ware presjeetesd 14 I oWng the ("Ity-wido Fism; Impact Mrdrl Weighted Average: Model's expenditures litre a,4 ti* City's General plan, which helps as our best tatimate of what City F define the torture growth pattern cond mix expenditures will actually be, earnd the of user In this City. Theze total arinual City-wide Model's 9"-idlture line as an egwWlture estimates were used to 4atimvte of the prokwble moxirnurn or calculate oll's shoos of City expo►►-Altvres upper II.-nit of actual expenditures. which ure +mot ski racyll y a�xlgnable. Scenario i - Oil Revenues and Aton fctnt Inflation rate Is also r ��fures � _ a ron3 1uRles�. mn P1 R f to mx mar y, the follawirV assumptions in this scenario, Ow urrent mrnber of tme made for the analy313 10-1 SercIiarts wells (1460) rernae +thrauO 1990. The 3.2 - 3,5: area devoted to o stays at 472 acres and oveerail production s coratant. Proptr31tiov 13 controls on tax rates and properey ae sments will appiy. Revenues derived from the oil prcAluction fees and royalties rise 10 percent per year The Cllylt share of the propeciy taw which Is the assumed Inflation rote. will reJmalo 20.7 perrowit. Pro~�tty tax, revenues rise at only two percent per yrar due to Proposition 13 Rwej on d-;Bing pevinits ar?d othiet• I' lirnitatiara. All other revenues remain the w1i' rice r.-Krige. some, assum;ng that tfw shane number of permits is Issued each year, aced that fee Total C h y e)qw Y:1ti,rres m - estimated Wens do cast change. Overul 1, reverroers dosing the, Cit} - + ��^ iTi�t:ai Model Cnd i:crease, but :rot � fa as expenditures. the Cermral Plar< f=Igure. 3. 11a showF all rrvet"s and Lt"I of t.'ity services stays c:crcrstunl�, expenditures for 19t [a-90. Under Scenario oil operations are a rvt revenue Infl+tat im. wIll avercxr. ten percent per geneerotor for the. City Linder the ass,"ed YeOr,, conditiem prirnarily tv--cruse the oil prodw il.on fee, which rnoakft up two-thirds �J Anol Is of Szenwias of the revenue, Is tied to the Comumer Prue Ind-ex; therefore, this portion of the In all f the following s►cencrite, re",�aes keels pace with Inflation. expenditures are calcvioted two woys. The first method uses the "Weighted Average Figure 3.1b shows the some scenario in IMocleI" deftloped In AMendix A be-t ause it "• tent (1979) dollars," that is, the Is pralx6iy the most accuraie and reverr►ms and expenditures aru adjusted for reeaoerable of tN mmilahle models for Inflation. This figure shows more clearly talevIatinq oil-related expenditurea. ,101 rret revemms reflected In the dish E*anditures rri also p:'e.'ictod based an between the re"nue 11no and ft the City-wide Model because It Is the tex dituro lines) dwwue over time. tednigm wed In many previous ana;yees This is bec*rre orwthird of the revervies arrd it give the highest cast ostirnate s of gwwrarterd by oil are not Indexed to the Of 1he modelt analyzed in Appendix A. intflctIrn rate. In anther wards, total Da"i rr o&ls were used to Ow exp conrdiWre rewnwex simply do not keep up with au -%*s In all of the figures In this sect;; infiatiar. Despite this deellne, all thus, each flqure shows two expenditure operations would aentinve to contribute lftft,. PerhW the best way to interpret rot revomms 0woughout the decode. thaao qn** Is to view thfi 15 Ad l Figrrro 3.1(a) ScwKwTo 2 • Phose Out Oil OkKatlWO from ;•+ The Townlat *A Downtown areas rely& some of the most valuable real estates In Hunt ImM an P44xh. Cwwrently, they cre also a+rnarq the poorest sectlau of fFe oil field in terms of prcduction. A feasible s�. scone rles, then, is one where the value of the surface for other uses (erg. boushr$) outweighs the value of the oil WIN recovered. In such a situation, It is roamwble to aasumee that the oil producers w• �. will gradually wanda n their n el is fro thie area and sell the toad for development. There ore 13.8 oc rees of all band In thri Towidot. Arninoll owes approximately .8 , -A A--.. , ,I . , I i ocr•es for wells th+D't are drectional ly *Hied under the; alk%.t . Sirx* these wells do rM derives their oil fr+arn the field under cisr%t&gal OFAAWO w wwtud.w. IWO-I o, OvAtaw.ooft&tysM. t'tm ToYidnlat, they area anumed tJ rernain. The other 13 o -ret are presumed to owe i out as foil owes a* *cre p' yam, the first 10 yearns, and three acres In the 4:4 year. �"l gu�� .1(b) 'The 95 wells are wAurned to phoser t&;4- as foflaww Mine welts per year the first 10 years, oid five rwe9s in the lost year. Canditians In the rest of the City remain unchonged. -Mr��yr ,w As the wells and ocr•ecsge decrease, oil reve*% from oil prodkcticn few, property taxes, and permit fees decrease oc caw diugly. It Is amurne d tlwt every well In this area Is paylrog wastewater fees, 1x)t M that r* Wiling or r*&it h.dg Is clone hexer. Tire, "roll City reveres from oil decline only slightly. Very ll tiles rervwme b m Twitly derived from .his part of the field due to its low prod uctivlty (see Figure 2i,2a). Expmdtures oleo dwame slightly as the roxnber of an aer and oll wells In the �`..`.." Townlat descrmee. «M N M 1�r �► �r es +w a r►+ a «.,�.;o,�► , �. Ow., "to-,MI SWAN"O".,&. Figure &2b dews r%vamm and esperedlto rm for thle sewwrio In 1979 dollms (adjuster! feel' Inflarlan). y 16 1� � war c Figure 3.2(e) t' Note that c Oeugh bath rwv*eK* + and exp"Ituros de Clint, net revenues (natal °. revenge minus tatai costs) era slightiy few than under Seem io 1. From a fiscal standpoint, althm* not revenues are slightly less In this seinmio err than In Scenario 1+ the City wrttim*s to net a high level of revom from oil. At �+ the: ,Barrie time, valaobler land is made wmilable for ether um. a Scenario 3 - All 1 is Phase Uvt1 ors eerie n. There are 95 =*a omfaining 268 wells that belong fry oil prtWucers other than the tree micr wmpmlats. Seenarrio 3 awld be reo!i:,ed If the wohm of all rwjl estate in �- a �--- HmtIngton Beach in.remes such that oil wool .r a 60 r ft ar .4 „ 99 prodw.tion by the Indepen4wts is less profitable than outer land uses. Figure cow VW CN, efts we wpwmi ft "-)A 3.0 shoes what M-ppere fey oti rovwnues and expenditures if the Indexpan&-ants phase Figure 3.2(b) out as f of i uwa: nine a erm pl rt,e ovt per Year fe. the fi fst 10 years, then five In the i . lost year; 14 wells phase out per year fair the. firm 10 years, then 2$ rn the last year. i • "� Oil revenues from t le oil productl ar, few, px ipos ty tax, artd permit few dee•it net as ► ells card acre*p dea;rea-,e. All lndepav3ents axe asato-ned to need wastewoter permits, and revenues derived �+ frorn them are redvmd v;arr'tg with the wells. 'rho number of dr'ili!ng and recirlilin permits +s not affected. The amount of •W revenue lost related to total revenue is small tneouse these wells do scot, un the average, prodift large gtxntitles of +all, Casts, howmrer, arse borne acearding to number of wells and/or acreop. A well that prodvv.4 large quantities of oil « requires arproxiiriatelle the wme City ,wises re a well that produces very little. §-y&h+a"ver j 41ti better producing well awwwev.- grocter rarwrtum 09 the City. own*On ■.i■rs no towafta+r. kale-I , %moan OMM-aft Th iWt the ratio of revom-va to coats is am 8"Immer gw4r for Wgitty pr tive well& tomse Mod" 17 'V �411Y Y i �IMrw�lli� ~ HrNot Ffcewse the independent wells Wnerally pradme 1e4* oil per well thin thcss of tM majors, phwl nq t hem out removes mast of the wells with tho worst revenue to cat r.atics. This mans tW adtho►ugh total rvtvecnu4s overall are la*er become there are fewer we ti ve wells, 9atol auto are reduced even more, thus imprr+av!n9 the overnh revenue-cost ratio. Theretorer net rrvenues in real dollars decline less Ih Simm 'ia 3 than In either previous screnarrlo. (;era Figure 3.3b). Scrncr 11lo 4 - UnitIzatial of the Townlot r�, er rrws a Not C!LCM. UnlWatiQn is a rune;Lad by which se"ral irrdepe ndents can le gclly Jain t+ogerther to �.._�._.►. .a._..�_.�.....,_ cat as if they were a sirgle corn any. This f Mw $1 '1 W Or allows them to apply e+nF►omed recovery techr►ologies and increme their CAP'J sac M"ft= WA XMW.Ut.n*, Sru+ M4 &VMpW*r`u OW-VA.. production.* Enhamed recovery of ton invulves purnpiag water into an oil pool In whist~ pflmcry pnxLctlat is nee ly. Figure 3.30) aompleried. By injecting water o4 certain pointG in the field, oil production in all wells oon be dramatically Improved. To do this In an area with several owners oll +� operctors must cooperate rate and help finance the venture, Unitization Is often the only way additianol oil can be scavered In significaM g mntities. .w,. In this smiario, unitization takes place in .�,..� Ov.- Tawnlot area. The member of wells remains the scene because vAiiie some new wells are drilied, Borne existiog, Inefficient wells are abandoned. In the first two r ye , drilling mid rsrdrilling activity Inrreoeas. Overall acre craps by five acres beta * of the abcxtidarrmmt of same old foeilitles mid the cwwildatl3n of merit rm w o-s. Production lomis are: c,nach V*d. w aur„r.. �....M w. wr• � ,�.,� c See Report #I in the ser ie*, "Preaervf 5urfam Access to Underground Oil R werves In L oftletped Area." ago ers%r Mril o-, . S :r • �►Mrra. w, • Figure 3.4(i) t r+r�111 in ft third yew, acreave Is s tet at 8, and all other factors am the • enarpt aviml p v&mtlan, which rr�Inar by we nriille�n barrels. 04 F19we 3A* Aws tte jurnp in rwomm carnal by the incrme in oil production f ee rMrr+eree from a aril llan earn tom we barrels of ail. SOCOAe the r1gra r of wells Is As SWm, and to'441 oar stabilises at an only slightly lower Iewl thm bef two, ants ever the 10 yew period are rely ►'° '` the earner as in Se snala 1, Igo Figme 3Ab shows than In areal dollars, not revirenr is greater in Scenarlo 4 that' In any of fhel pw1ous iosnarias, while worsts " aotuolly uvltrw. Clowly, unitization could Increae reverram whir reducing its by .�_ inorwoting prr &-etiwity without Incr rig ,n e% a U M .a " 41offifft tlri overall nanmtw of wells or aocreMeb. 3e C,� i�"� 01""Cal W-%%" adII��Nt 1NFi11it 7w� WAIA OM . t i Ib a IMAM. --- i`� 3.4\Y/ i'h� sarrrariae reprrsar� al.er gars 1 9re� futures far all opercfiorrs in Huntington Seach,, It Is not W owns which, if any, of them will take plots. Meet 111(ely, rnom of tieirn will Omw exactly cm pcwtrayed In • this amW ysis. However, morme cares~l usi om w cxn be ckown fr= tNrse scomw its. Firvi in Orr of these cam or combinatim of xtrern0 1 is olsa that continued ail Operations will to signif'icmt not rer s f or the C,M11 Y7W Sera4 If uniflscrtian and erOx nmd " �..•�•... (b scar eW are tlrry awn help Increme the w awes to the My without significantly IWW_Wrlinq 4PW antse In Same aosaj. Citt► at mated with oil erp*ratlm N "Ad earn doCiirrr slightlyt rya r+swwmes world dmimtlaally Inch. ft 1 �edas qb not mo if " p 94 � * /r N " A e6wtr k f pwflan of the rwvvms - IN Ink I b �rafia W4 UnI�e �'+'�wx *...a w r. �yil.�ao ,wow �Ml� rwM. �� flout p1e , tt y will not In the OWN Wl.n). future. TOO ►tree me* on aoripanies in � rrr. .en r.�s+ I9 :: W. 14totington Beach Amlroll USA, Chevron USA and Union Oil — *to chiefly 'f.S Garfield Golden:mstard riespomdble tar the significant not revenues Tao%n-Vo-fJLNwmtqwn Area •f i girded the City by current and cont i nure d . oil apwotions. (See Figure 3.5 .) The Garfield/Galdenwest and the Townlot/Downtovwn parts of the City were analyzed specifically because they are exonrples at areas where the *Wstinr9 oil operations, may be cha►ging (See Figure F'iguree 3.3 3.50, Both of these areas .are of great Interest for future deeveictprnent other than oil. union 40 Chev"n 12% Downttown ownlott As mentlared offs, the awnti o'ttD'owntown o-•ea Is eapeclally WerestIng in light of the pmlbllty of it recycling to new uses and its potential for unitization arxt enhanced recovery. There 11s possibilities were analyzed in Scenarios 3 and 4, This section simply separates out don the Townlot/Downtown from the rest of the City to help highilght the fiscal Impacts specific to that area. Figures 3.6a to '16c illustrate the 'lellowin g possibilities: 1) the existing oil "rations, remain active during the next decode, 2) Me off aperot;arm grads;:sly phase ovt i during the 198(Ys and 3) a unitization and eahoroced recovery program Is undertaken. Ap moll 686 The analysis Indicates that oil *wotions In this part of the City currently gw"rate net revenues. However, rising service carts, and the fact that total revenues oil ttevenuesi 1979-00; at not keep tip with inflation, will make these smaller operations rat "losers" Majors vs. 1.4uapendente, sarnetime durir>g the 19W&, even if production remralne at todar)Os level. However, If a unnitiration program Is umlertakaen aired is successful, the oil operotions would became significant not "wityners" throLhast the decade. G&flerld Goldenweaty The future utp a( tro a- lrTc/CT rrwost area has inn the subject of aarreiderable debate in the City. One factar wNch could be coolderod In " decision abmxf ft best use of saris land Is the fhxW knpvat of mall mood um as 20 ,.M r � A n �r Town lot/Dawn town Ililil Garfiold/Coldanwaat vAb ,r. r .. AAA�i. CI 1 ''i OF MUNTNI GTON MACH orwr�z Qowrr ea� .�► + NR�VN� F1gunr .5( r� w S. w A M � M *M o w so a I~ " n " M ` rr I war n .4 M " r a v a w w 1�,w1.e�.o�i �..wi.W�,'.�/Mr�., rrr�lrra� �...arK aurucL.r ,r•� Aw+ �fu r..l.eis wr�prw�r.., lsrFtrfO �rf,.r� qr:7 rwadr�. Illy"&Wei. ir`lWty 3.6 W kej ftlemw er�wdt i. r���r.eiM I Mr ,r an oil production area. i`figure' 3.7o and 3,7b indicate the probable impacts of 1) oli operetlorm continuing unchanged in this wee for the next 10 years end Z) the operations gradually phasing out. At this time, the al pool under this am dose not appear to be a likely candidate for . unitization, so such a project was na analyzed. 1 M tl M The figuraa indicate that cu"wi fiscal Impacts are quite gnMgnfflewt " the • operatlone darn" few road but contribute little revenue. DuMnq the dec*cb, oven if production could be +* +►�du «iwrwr r rM,WONOM,i, mahttairod at Current jowelop the "WION MI 4. 0- %,Ww operations terld to beowne not loom bit gym.maim" agldn, thr L"wto era so small that then are Mentially b1comquerntial• r, I-J r mob i �.; Fib TGsi) Figure 3o7(b) w 7° •��..� M � � w M M w r n ti fff fM flat t� p ws « w ei a to w w � JYr 411 Myr.r wl�deu�, Q.�L.1dvrbliarve Arfr O') flr�a�4d �psdit tea. lt�ltlfl ibrt■nt fl�sionr IMO 1M0, at �� fiw��u fit% Owkwal. IlfT1 Cbl LMnI tlMi' dw Figure 3.8 " +� a�.wrttrlr�ll, 1b�t.� tllM� p Altmotive, DevelomM ant to the Townlott Ogwjown Areav Al �aspect of tip w quntlon of wtather o 5 p�oeluct l cm 0muld be env uroged to co.►tinu4 conterMr mmund Ow development that should replacer oil oprtstlom this sectlen compares the fbe d bv*mctr of ag aperatior.1 in the „ Te wdM/ Ck wntown to three of likely iteermAw oast lhnre.* i to Towdowownt mn was is Wv#md rrwnUy rndurrr-ewp�y reriel"s4 wW bg W6 we =nod to me "le Rao the w.. «� w W M w �► ±• .t N w Mow WW of use. This,, OwMnad with Mn Mft *vd" ~294 Dire it vrry salftMe teat 1my 61 IWrd bN their eras that owyalo wAU boowm w4dwn eiarA ity Y V00 sit f W*M-a+mtq ftl"W UI atiM*Vft rw **"Atr.w. itN-�M�1 ihlM•!� 1A11�t�ww JlctMr Iliri ttgt�l. ftnove area b e d A awdy Is mm b elp q 011ndAKFA to elaterwne Ow best future rr of tie 1wd In Chet area. y;1 i r j �J- r;�ir e. LMnf that City-wads F'lswn Impact Modal, in the Townlat (F*re 3.5s) follow a re mom and ampendituma malting fraon similar trend at a similar enognttude (after 1=00"Ifft) of the 13 all cores in the Yownlat 1965) as the revenues and expenditures am& to rrrediuKn denaltl► Midrrtial can be from medium dwwlty rssidmUsl in that biw*td. This is illustrated In Figure was (Fkp re 3.8). Further, It should be . 3,90 with half of tyre► *weep recycling In noted that felt Nr of these devslep i tant 100, end the other hale In 1912. Fypas has a very larger ne"tive fiscal Impact — In the range of five, to 10 The trwnrbm eVwn ore rout eatimwrtes, thmsrond dollars per year, but the itrenb *4 jlwierral magnitudss are clew. Ake time gars mi, revenuer degrease The conclusion to that fiscal Impacts, while and o gwndittm Inc;riesse slightly. It is lrnpor't4 t, do not provide a Criterion for spot that this t)Vs of development ehhmsing one Lof these development types gsn"n rat ecvoruas In the yew it is over the other. Thle unders c*rea -the Witt but because rof Rising casts, inflation limitatiam of fiscal snalysis It is a very and limlto an pro►pm-ty tax ratios and important input Into the decislon-making ess�aseGr+snts, it tends to become a not Irwar process — but theta are other ahwtly aftorwsrd. (Soo Section M) considerstlam mf great Importance that are Involved. Section CO discumse these The most revealing aspect of this Duos more full, . pro)ecti m is that they r*venkas stab experhdituree frarn oil operstlene rrernalning i 1 24 JJ�y1lRLS^ Y, JJIP{r li 'Y •Y a' 4.0 Beyer MeW krpact� far+wlaurr 3Wtlant hM dEsarnMed the 4.1 !on-Flocal Casts tarns of flocal Irrrrp wt analy9th In kW am deci,slau. Altlro* knowledge of Aasthetictu Oil wells Impose y rse flead kr " 16 arrt, that ,qua , end odor impacts. Pwnpina lnfatrmMen alw o is rot su ficiard for the units end tcrrrlcs irnp0601 tlta native visual dwldow-wkw& The effects of a land use impacts anoclated with ashore oil an As Citl►'!r bOW nwet be belev with production. They are late, unattractive drat frowlh W kgmts brat about by fccilltles flwat give on "Indt,stricrl" look err, Virg owe lwW use aver aratlwt. This any area In which they are located. ffenj while not Inter4W to dot the vWw of final wv!yde, wWwline+t Its 000WOMIly, oil valho emit gam drat ifrr %dfs% by briefly pr+eserrting hone a sulphurous odor. AI the odors rPoar -I' Bea tM and lasrrefite. �" Mt at= daily larW dep�of emrse, an the dIm-tion of the wind why they CNOWN !#° 40 all �t:dn are are pr+orent, ** srrroll Can be torrti"* IarMrw h*wr Irk wry the qW" of r x � 00 In Wile a FInWly, Owptrr*rV unitsr Klers e* , + ' to 410 not aertwPe oware and drUfto r* cm be nobye Ott► W*4 fhaol Ilia svowlfy of now irr+pact var10 with . � to WOMM �Ity too Me t the � ► da+d errd +af aqutprr*nt� � "at1+ld�r NII' r bile ne ve =sts awwkftd with ilwe kirwb of ��� .�;.• ,. � Irnpach irrcir,�lr nirhrd of rea+ em an 0644 lamed arr p r vduft 49W vt %ft to on ore b�►aartrrnweld 004 �dli�ir � 25 _ ILYY'1 41Y����[ 1"`.,IS}'.�1y11Y{Y1.•. .. A,ura • .. .. . _ .., . .. v, Swne extreme odor and anise Impacts can im�m�eroved Bolome 4f Payments: Wham the also hnpose adverse health effects art UNted Rates spy more rrkxwy on perow" newt the offending site. Imports than other oovotrles spwW an American exports, there is a net flow of �tunit Costs An opportunity cost Is dollars out of the country. This Is call-id rwv a r Imposed in arty situation wtwo a an unfavorable balance of payments. The cl►tolaa Is madk between tvm or mower undersiroble: rromificatlom of this situation vlternotivee. By choosing any of tie are well known -- it onravotes Inflation alternatives, the opportunity to have ate and weakens the dollar. Because importetci of t1a others Is necessarily foregone. In oil Is our singh* largest lmpwt, substituting the exec of all production In Huntingtom domestic oil for Imported oil b a Beat s, an opportunity cost is incurred by significant step to help reduc* Inflation using Iand for oil pr+oducticut rather than and strengthen they dollar. eyrie other kind of development. Employments A third benef it the City All land In Southern Callfomla is bercvrning derN"`sW "rcm oil operatiarts Is ttte► increasingly valuable. Housing Is In ornployme nt the industry brings to the pairtimola0y short supply. In light of this area. About 600 persons cre cgrectly situation, the opportunity cost of oil mpioyed In oil opewatioru In Huntington production moy be too high in cute parts aeoch.1.4 In addition, oil operators of the City. On the other hand, developing support Ior-ol businesses by pirehasing they surface precludes the oWrtuheity for 9wds and irrvices in the City. (This Is oil production. Unless It Is clear that oil sometimes called a "mvitiphesr effect".) producti or? Is low v+al wibl e than awt her use of tfret land, press Ang acefts to the oil 4.3 Federal and Local Perspectives an from 0* surface is quite Importrsit. For NW-f'sca M&FFam go—n--e is excrnple, If oil oil surface In the Toymlot were recycled to other uses, un tization Interestingly, two of the major benefits of rand rewivery of millions of borreis of oil) oil production (rt ltx-ed dependenre an would no hangar be: passible. (See Report imparted oil artd Improved balance- - of - 01, entitled tPreserving Surface Access to payments) are greater Om - local in Undargn%wW ail Reserves in Developed soot. This means that the City's coil Araos", for a detailed disciie,eian of this pv&ction F rotects the national interest piablem.) by helping to improve the ec norrty and contributing to nationmal sewrity. 42 Non-fiscal Barofits However, many of the wants, such as off:nsive odors, visual Impocts and reed Rimsuced a:r Can Forei ri (.ills A projwt values, are idol in rcture. w►"l ft y—h. trM ou V100fern faciry the notion b the uncertainty of our arwgy The fact that the positive and rww"i v e; supply In an srnetrssncy. very barrel of Im'rtpacts of off almrations are prim t-wiiy feat of! protluced In the U"lf*d States is at efferent W"Is of gimwivnent, paterrtleliy a substitute for an imparted Increases the difficulty In anessirg them. step send the Innpar!once of wnall fields In C". tot Energy lrnpesrt grants, such as the aMtrll Arq to the domestic oil supply art h"&ng this study, provide fv,ndinn�g ONA" rat be urrderstaterd. For sxamprie, from the federal gownmant, bvhich the Wumrttngtext Befit fleld Is the se+►sltth benefits from Increasing energy I&OW all prroduoar in California and pr+oductlen, to IwW gowrnrtte#s to help threw pa C*vl of the staters oil. them calyse arwl mitigate Ito advarse M46 Move psraot of Callfe"Oors oil effects of Increased energy productlan pradrrcTian e+aMM from fields wen smaller which tend to impoct the local comet%pity. thrum "not+an Becich. se x ++ r 4 r ra a.. h r' r 'I. am Wslon [ for* amludirrg this rel wt, two This frond grid writimm through the ,qPMFT't qM11ficat1we to ttw awlysis 190s — ell eactiviti6s will qwwiratr nW be otr ed, The fleet Is to relterate reverwsa of similar riMnitvde for the rwxt t! elmplifong Ow"p►ticxw made Howr4er, if plaductlon thrwww%wt the mart. Po "cond Is to cods stir tl�n mmeo these r rues twW +etrrphoo xe tho 11mitatirrw of Meal rw lysis to decline sli4htiy over the next ton yearsq -• it Is only eV hwwiwd input to the become property tax rovemoea foil hind dMISIonWMkhrg if the Inflation mate, Thk mepa I sat a+t to wwww tho gareral An important firemg In fts o alysia Is that 4va"04 whe are the fiscal its mat of the ail-related rave are tied to rem* no fit rn op olti� an tht pity of prod Wlom Ww*l*. "AN*, the ftee major f#srrrilVkn i;;d Thip quWlan war oil carnponin with opwatlom In the City &MMOW for 197040, 40 writ G& fey "a (Amlrtell# Cmvm, LWc n), which apt nM d a m b oridar fear dilfe w for ~ 90 peroint of total flel&wIdie � 11-04 lU Furfhw lfic O"W tion � prod�c#tangy$ oarrtrlboft mat of thw qv" to me YZZ Pemvlsawn and , to Ow City* Even if of i to GOW Gel+dlr!MNd w including fraw h4we an *Wotan vMwe to so am "400 CO&IPM+0 to artlm liar# pfrtra-out of proAxtion by MOO, not . � thrw� the 1 wouldt �ti 3rr3� �!� �► linld �1ifloarltarr 0010:41WOWMW fWM May be Othwr nahw fird d re the 1w0 ft quwnt. r d tti l wl 3n the �Ir+o oar. on TQ+enlet, &rCh wt wpould far drarrraRi+o411y s ttr�e prfod Ilan of f Ow NY rw ivad Moray of "to low rffioiarrt wooh and, j in t rerw frame, oil alltlough Mt Mverxsn wand be dwilyd"O So ! f fire loots 190%,* fetal Mt t+M11 w'"I r - I r n -- k ' i ten ted for th* ors �ereotett in In irhase �ac�s are likely to In+rol.nr rw+rerse this +ktr. Ia Han 3,3)s loam* as wall, n thr brts d fisl Impacto twithor Iond uw option is The st of ell raven aml exper Pturse nacres wily preforred. Altha*h the flrct-., In thrt Gvrfieldr Goldenwast and Tovmlort! Impocte of loath UM aro important, a Downt~ areas are quite revwIirog. with declalon to rmwrap ene w4w the othwtr the exaWiaorr of a fvturo whwv unlilzailon will deywJ on other mosIclerotivu beyond of the law Oot takes plow, oil operations fiscal aro*sls (See Section 460). In them, two arew will her not revenue ' laws for ** City. Fiery*~. the oil This 4 not true, tt!)we{va , if the Townlot Is 01witiew in thew arm eannot be unitiyred mi enhanced recovery Is P%P dere d a motor firaw:Iral turdem to the sweauful. In th st case, the City rarely Ion City. The rnarltvdr of is quh gained or signif font toverxues ft*-n oil activities in to# by the City to thew twr, cam Is In the *4 area (See fi Igure 3,56. rarer -A $5, $10,OM (tee Figures 3.5a, b, e, toad FIgures 3~6a, b). Further, 6m ed As o rosul l of Propeal tion 13, party tax on the City-w1da rx l7� estltt ale of reveorr.ms. which hw* beer► the traditional expendlturft aml revewxt gwsrattLi ue 'rirgrcial base of local govorrrtrerits, will miediurrr-amity rosidesftial deeloprnent, not molly keep pace with Inflation. it$ too, Is a net revermA loner of similar Canserc**Mly, for wrxne fowl um, the casts mapitude (Sae Figure 3.7). to 9* City in prvolding wvices gill tend to exceed the revenues grated Istr those Here agerin, the Ismi tations of f isral ram. This stWy Indicates, however, that anwlysis are emifronted. Oil activities In of laast for the next decade, City-wide all the Cortieid/ Goldenwest and Tow nict/ r4wations will tot fall onto this catergmr Downtown ereas will prdxbly result to arW will contirvie► to gawate significant revenue loom for the City. rust rsoerrues to the City of K."tinyton Merdium»density re siderrtioi developments March. 20 a i' • Madsis for dl#tributi It ituros, to Differ t Rand Use Too* J4�t't scree ;mots tisoarl l epewt tanoiysls tryi to terrrreirrrj where propa�rtion of City I r10W, lean R,worably be attributed to the differwO land uses &W rel0erd activities In 'lty. As discussed In 1lre toxt (Section U), a few types of a Lures con be trtaead rnwe or hm dr tly to diffxrw* iwW was. Examples ware expvulltures an police o W fire a+erid who the City keeps rsoards of to locotiaw of the calls. Ws assumed tho the perawdege of total calls generated by each lain inter category was a reasonable me a►ure► of the �"sa`wwrt a of total a ximndittwes on those calls tit each I&A ure category Vermmtted. Atrelhsr *soor�rple woe tto enerrdituras for the salary and bomflts of the City all lyd1mcfer. Gila wasrad than his duties ware tied directly to oll prrodu+ction arctivities in the City and that these ss nditvres couid be 11%migned" to ail production um. That Wesrt nwj rity of **atdlturarr, however, cannot be traced to particular um. Certwqur*ntly, a rrrodel for estimating this lomportiore of 0 itures, am" differrent land scree, w+hieh a�a rot oth"Iser directly =09r►oble to �thmm 1�, was developed. EXPENDITURE MODEL Alg an .16&b M is we aroximatiew of molity. They are tools for snaking wmplex problem enslbl�t. 'This rrwoessarily meant that simplifying anum;*1ora must be made about ttw 10► be nwdolo& it is very Important, theroforre, to mite reaminabie, defensible Iowa The leery to building a goad rr I Is to nnaximixe its accuracy w;tfn0ut rnal(Ing It too complex. A good rrrodrI Is accurate owugh to be useful, card simple wough to be clearly understood+ The er*wWItw* mode►I used in the analysis w = tfwNrigrred with this as a qwI. Smw kyrporwnt low* were considered In c,a utructing the model. The first Is the information n qulred by the model, be oom the milable data limit the range of models passible. The t»or eI erx*t is the nnost sensitivo possible with information. that Is reWlly ravallablo. � idly, the toaft" rq l must distribute oWs among the Variow types of land ups In a war ao istw* with to tati� formed by r�eoaon We assurnptims and Infortrned.opinlem. AI=Vit the purposes of this mod 1 Is to atirnate unaul9rssble exw%diturw attributable► to cell ac , It carerrat be umW for "d purpose union It distribAss coats among all lured wo ty Ina furl is rommo sle. Flmllyr •fhe r smW and analysis slid be rooroduelble.l S Any reader should be able to understand *erhws the mxr"m carve from red apwther analyst should be able to acomwitrte the do% and acre the model at some time: in 0a future. If this is not poolble, the usefulness of the study Is questlo nabia. 29 MIZEL 77r•, ■ J ` r M y , I ■ •� The EonwAture Model for Distributing Owaslanable Costs ■ m&QW-dmwrVf1dm were mix* n Nogning a mom to distributci unossignable its,, Fitsf, uric elgreble putt 0=14 be bwiw by all mvrAws of tha Clty, amrdirrq to turn* dela l an of 9*A mwnb es"fair share So%* a wArose *at* are wasigrwbl* are treated as "public goadi".16 A pulAle gfxd maku the awmunity as a wfrole bei•ter off, re matter haw much of the good each member of the comrspity comity Ocon %xm i". fears its from the ocr rue to all as evwWbvs of the aemn r and trot solely an ohe bads of caro rnptla u heretores all who liver, 4b business, or am pr Wty In tip City should c=*lbute ftir share to the community. To determine each sergrnaf "fair shoW, we next anumed that two key fe crton am Ise wed to •a+ VOINAV fire share of City. r*endituras tar each land use type. Thrse are: 1) tits area of the City a --i maular land un t,,Vo -arc wpies, and 7) that number of u nitu of +that 'larxt use type located In the City. Area is simply tht acreage ci Particxrlar I&W use type occupies. it can be ,argwA that as mart woo In the City dovekps tixprnditorm In rtas*, and that the Wreo p rlm+rcrtsd to cifferent urns reflsaft their share of rornrnunity domes. I "Ite are measurers of the odegrae of deteolopment of a pe rtirulat land ure. For rsiidential ursars, a '"unit" is a dwelllrg unit. Far cwnrrrsrclal &W Irl"rlal ussrr, "We rrurnber of "units" is asrurnrd too equal the number of business permits In-AW to thart par*ticuPc r u e; for oil, it Is the arrnbw of wells; (cloudy, vacant land has roo "units"). The logic for tWs Is that each "unit" Is an entity that does bwrinme with the City, and each unit generates erica to the City. As units irrenme, Oseep ce dweloprrwnt lncreaims), casts increase. -rho roletiamhlp betwomi acreage wW units Is called "domity" and riders to the ratios of units e .r dwallir units aFTe Oil wells acre etc. . We MWM brat r35 densit 'to ocrs�ape+ ( �1 � p r � � ) y increaeusr total Cityditures Ira-reared (olthw* the wwgpv ex wWlturm per unit may doeline). The rrrsdats Q,analysed use MR- . or units or bath (density) as men�c of the shore of tonal WwMigned coats that am be attributed to different large us". final arming Historic Daft The fist c prwc h for atimating unassignod casts for different low urea war, to we a conputer to andd;Z histarlo d*to6 gy uad a statistical tecAmlyue called "sfepwhw "rrgr+aai�� , we tried to see Omw the City's total budget has alraVed over tin* cmd to relafa "We "P OWW to changer in W* wafta war deaelc)d aare—e of different land use typeso tJnfortvtwtwly. coewage Infawnation it a mllable for only tlwu last faw yos, om d despite adjuskno is try t errd infWtion, the variables wen so similar to va aWher (MO-ly► +camel* dX thJ nsr Werame could be mc& from the resuiis artth any dwoe:af arnfidsrrc * That �farrsr efface :o design a rnadel based strictly on past datetry and te►,jr"Jcn analysis Wrre . e Residuals &A Pearson corralation c oefficirtts were wvlyzed. The waurner price Indent was woad to adjust for Infiailarn and an attempt to "cletrend" the data by using "cltrr my" wkrlarbles was mrsde. The vrurrlables were taro hlghlr ax\related to give mea il%ful results. �n �� n 6'r 1 " it ,{�► 1'cal r A. � lR •1' L_ `+ ' - ' ,• . ' unJ r '{ , .•yo- r �, M{ 5' I u J` I, ,i "+1` x r� +.A u ,✓• S" +. J ' rl a fleet carer amly the proWtiam In total developed �1�1• tMptM�l, to W�t� e V ureesrignable Baits for different lead use. The second MIMak y I)* IMA tvM we bath carp and mml?m WmIty) tQ edimate the O tars fair diffmm t #and . we y av 9ft aatpWVVW WW units, ,�t ar�et �t1 p than two fsgtvrs by at Masi¢ ed aysroW tshnlq as* These rare �, �eisss�rr�llr�ir. m QUO* � Of 4011"m expurwlturw blr tleom of 6d r i*s a oam of uesrl vasty i to � uw� d � d� A; WWI dov&*,W mormogm arrgi-1 Thb the aMppmeah In tl r 1,11f y or Ocisy-wide Irlseal In=' * MOW, Far e%* t, On" riot�ent''m uOr occupy 75 poraatr+t of dsw►la0rrll .Ow"Myr to � 0� �g =twar kIlmd ogwdltum are attrlliteted to mideau" by the scans ,of ; of adped aorta am attributed to mwo wolol u mm4 g p tW4. tq Indtptrlal.user, and 4 per to oil. Mate that vocent tared m am Ives no *hied of rdrtr. ThiM nradrl M Om iderred one extrsmarp taking only area hats i asp a This IV Is PImple, sayto urderstarnd, andtTepeodua:lble+ Ttm e riquitrawn s am be rodillr fulf Hied, Disaiivarttrq"e It secou4s for only one of the key detewninantal It assumssf thwt ds reat 0.dovolop�na� nees t b not an hnpurtant factor In distributing u Wwd ON't� alw Irnpliss d'art *my acre 9werates casts eewlly. Further, olnoe It M Im y c immed with 6wilopod mareagep It dome not amount for vorm* twW* lulo&l Q tellos solely an Ogres of development to mWartlon una lgmed carts i firer" dNfarr*mt lark! «s. Recall that S nitO am a .meseurs of dogm. of � o0volopnwto and Vat r�sW*mtlarl "utlts" refer to dwelling Units, Commercials w4'trAWjjal "units" an equated with busirrea liow*rs, &W an oh "smlt" le am on wrr11. Not% qp lr►, vacant land Its assumed to be castlm. ' This r+rrodoI is a xwderad the otter extrerne, taking only dagree of cbvslopn ent into account, Adyarrt a Thin we I Is also sirnplo, easy to understand, tsprasd lbles and his rnln rtol "A ihwvwrft Dbaduentegwe It completely discounts away aw a coat feetoe, and anumes each w* gerrarrates coots egWIy, regard m of denOty. Since there we no units an vapeant land %y deflnitlarnX 1t Is left out of the analyoir. Most IftVartantlyp they distribution of costs ensim the uses swerm skewed - rerddantlal h arsslgad newly all aauto$ *hoe la triad gets aimat acre. The next two mdels try to sa mu t for bath am and toles. 31 'L � 'w 'h !♦ r}yy�;ij�,y� '.�i',�.t V���h Rr�:Y ��+'• P +Y.~`I,r`'i r. fit'-, '�`' +�%t'¢ •.J ',r •, i, w � r•*�•ryyk t ' '� r i M r rl v�r / rr '�I R . • *! Pr �)^f • ) * 1 � r{1� y i t rr ,r•) i:•y f1, 1 Y.r ,' +1 �V' � J a-. 4 Mfg ',r a+� �, ��� Y.1ISyi� '•, , ' .,v ',,ti, . ', , ,.� � f,+ T rl�, , r. n � .',',r,, r n• `, r, yIh'''� , 4 w +'/1 ! y { . r l y r 1,�1r { 1' b „! 'r,, rµr f� �n 11� i � � r a , ♦.... �,,'{{ �'� ;,� 4. � �¢ �4 Ids rm 1• i r , Ml r i w � Ott✓i t:.'Y! + ., � .� 111 �� •' .� � •' �.e�' � , -,' 1 Al �1,+ y)r , .,..:.'.p,d a,+r'_� •r r, . AOL4 • ' Mad l VI tlr *y Solo- lu the first two. For lot rosldential veer wo pwood and 92 w sip by �ret end mow n�dsl t Thismom 5 pert. by 00 same proasm oorrrrwoiW t fe" pommel, Indurst W 4.7 pW"W and oil SA peraerrt. ThIS IVAdrl dear list mmely blermass OwtOwityr data W effat i'ap�r lbipfy. it it rani o p rhMM+rN► ► a►rd man $ "them to fa+iaWS that mm ally aftnt oasts. laisadntar Are►e �arwd art Ia�pnwsrK mediv+ln f tmpartarrce ire deterrninlr the *Arfr of urraeigned cats attributabio to eah um. This nvww tw Cats da OW gory a0cotding to the denrlty of use OW daurrres tltir sarrre average dwWty for Qii vas. Furlhwr, vamt land Is unaccomfed taw. Ill. Wolghted Average M*61 Madal iV amoots for am &W mgme of dwefap romt in a diffwsnt wvy. it wiri ft t" facto so that it is mono mWtive to density. This Isdorm by ON't tto rsrmW of units assigned to a particular use to the nundw of acres to t use. This am Is dirridsd by tho total of all units phrs all tires In t�City. ip This "weighted aNerage" gives all fly mort Importance to degree of as a factar than mrope. Vie means that densely emcee casti tlrnrr ttrase foss densely devela�d. (This is 'true slum if imrWa axt unit L foss In rvwe dsrrnly developed arao wmail avets t to be it In Mom density eron.) This nrotleI attributes 87.3 poewd of to &arts 1a rrssiderrtitri, �� perWWrrt too c�mrrraroial, 2.3 t P try tail, mW 29 to virael'rt land. 'See Table A.1 kw* Advank� This model has fire sorrre data r�uira ments am! r+epraducibility m On previaw mods,;s, it Is aiightlx MCCO user last, but Its Irrcraaswd varm1gxity am be justified by Oaks ire moWtivvity and accuracy* it is @Wwldr to the third modal for try remowd. Firlst, it cm accourd far vacant land In a rea I* way. Smvid, by gh+v siightlY mare weight tO the +degree of disvrokPyisnt factor, five m�clai is reran Snsiti•ia to density of un - I.o., hi isrmities are domed mwe col . This is a from realistic tretrtrrrent 01 the typo of IW d use Is platy '.a effect comets. 32 n oo M.: ppp111���y qqi, }}�LL tt n���N,,�ii��,�� '''1�/'iR,�'`J!'r`iel;��ul Y��F �r�� .� rY�'.� �• i�� n ` 1,, l u • i V V L� i �� i'i I M ;�r,'79 � ..�� ��� ' Ad R1 I M11ir1 ML 007 U0251 71r456 8703% � 1of f 30197 %W 4 M Sol "d 929 969 19M W O6 3 472 1660 4932 W � * ly TOTA � 14*2U 67$70 e19914 IOU% Swmwe City of tftlr nn Ibuch Ptre ing ClAdon., t l TABLE Al ' i hunt tot beach planning division 1 33 .. 9 TOW +;� � {, " Syf b,�i�,�j��Afr •, ����� i �'�' i��° � ��R �c .) ���,��'' r' ti a�� .,, �.M�',6.p7{y � ��x � AI �r r! �h r, rW� �. ��� 4_ AL 'e4e .�u.r.Mr r +• IV M Her � by ft �Mmft 1 ut t! utt.rr� .rid +mot r � i�M ab ;��� • 1lriwnfee& ��I�rla� der a A-v le�id art �::, • .� r'•it S i 1 . r 1 I I� f.• 1 i fl 34 Y • 1 ,it � .�`}a i' i y, i�'� ti .+' F l r., L 1 � r 1�,u, k J�} p � � ti r M 1 Y, `4• A f T +{ �" r•�x.�5k M;+ '^,.i, 1 rt.,' E „ ; F y�'�,y+ �'"� f� � ,y�1�� r� `�,�;. h � y� � �y,�:,S�,�I�J��,�� . ��f � l�:, 7V�� � �;t+r,0. `�� ��•!� r• u fT♦ •�,' p�1,� 'Rl'� ��r '"� F•N" �u� °' �7'J •� •w ilr•rT'dll 't�,b^'���' �Y I� ��� ''y�F�LL y� r�' ;r.yl�', ,I� ;�r��,i �:y ru•i, ui yay.����1 � y' �� � �. ui i + •n � �A;' 1 =al�`�',��'A `? �'1 � 1�• �' •'�I" .. l,D' 'yT''•.'��11.F � �' 'icy.}VN"� /�7 1�!0.� lyy 'lrwu r � �x a 'f;• 1 .r T II�u0Ity tar* Darin v aft o uthrrn Cafifarniter !� o +y y IAI fhlt � � fryd 4411rr N0* 'Mw►aih In lW41+rptar" � � tl�ir rraarnt rratUre,of thr 1"I �s of ta" � �a1lom �alt�li nri�rwirrf tha o •1m11�r erral P� oil hall, to n000, howavoro t the city drrira signifiow fevmm from thrae f alligm Thae r9voroa figm as pmeented below. The remom for 197960 are a fallon. Props ox TOTAL r $� Pory Tex i To AL khan hhant and Tordcarrrn: j PtoWy Tic Plpollne From 49 2 Tel �ahtse Fra $1 131 AL bohmlifasr�lo umity rMobw TOTAL 00 MOW*Frars trbw S". .Aard iu 1295 ice TOTAL oMe Total romLm to ft +pity fmm th a s facilittisi Is $It124064 far 19?M- P*eNne aW utility fram.�Vse tsar to! as sit by contorts bst~ thw City W4 the • wrl%e a mpgMar The maW factarr ow affact pipeline rota we size a W Imth of pipe A the yea'ly flow thiougr the pipe. Utility rotes am 6=W an rm seta Of the proatmt cmdesl by the fondgm (6.9, gag srleatrioltA 35 n, ti 4 j �r nc, tikl., ( 4:rx .,lpo .� r �' � ..xM"{9/� '.r ��h 'r� �,��W Yy i)1_ ' ry �i• �• f� Rr Qvw-64 iV� ` .r'�1�'� �M � hAi r+ n� ' ! '+if 1 1 i'' '^' _ ♦ ri 5 Y ! �.!k r,�w �• 't!�`k ' !' _• .y�F14 � k �i' �ii ,�f +� r y r • f �k�� " a��, ��r,, � apt, �, ���� _ � .��- Y p:, f) `ta '� `,, :"b ( r�.. ti, ' P or k^',y,4 t, �•� .c� 1 �� }I� 1.iI '{�f, n ".�iY .. 'rr:�,•i r +�0 , .. ., G . ,�, "n�.•��W ,'� 4(,1 t` ,?,{yR�':I�.�,1641 in Q r and ''fit l +IMF 9WHOtw l is . bw W! troy pf ►�Irrr ftowhION 009010 ibl sppliod 4 hen t Ire y' MAL" to r F, f. 1r � the MMu� IM11�1N �1« wor rrM �'+pl�ei�t�r the trw s + y I 1 01 :6 bom"mw iwAc"mm&rR ARC ur;M.iTr FitANr.* .'t OMNI L f ly► fi 00 � 1 f.M1 It P111,8 l Pnv1146n Out r"Nw A www;w 1"Lown rrr h4wrWt FWN mw,vtww y h Cw Idw Tlu► it hoot*f tM fiwd m1+*nr1 wt@ • 111 in rltA��ir IM�h N t+trm.i��' hMu�wrtlrlr•off M ttr Fitt►IM MOO, 1 lr1M tlMI�M/ kr plrh■p,11r trt1�rf f r Mirvwm to "Wor mb of Owdty 6dkq O th a cat haft% POWs WM+Off► � +��! ii�-b. er an h� wrdw flued Fawn to �04hPMwlkr i.mrt.rlp amw #004 a 2% of thr Vow.i nad e otlpa r�rlMnA p►R w of tr.rhlra. b �'Ntwr poe Nfr AM* 5y'w atom lr M o1 hN tw a above. Ow4ft 'fi1aw is OWNQ &M Swft tom as dove. limit~ awt 90 evarp Pto w t rate of rwtulo-Amid 01me M-#w s`07 boon W pot bra"l x. M �:shdtor4 PM+lhw CwtLM b bra X!wd Wan JIWI-�hM t orm � 16M wftamd we of totom Ir f104 at 11.MD Ow • IMipirlforAwwwdow !tl too ww" m Prarsort mo of trrtwc r-Mwrd rinae LOU-Iw 20% bow 1%of the nvwm dr 4"d tray woo of Frrtwtdrw. tOlior go CW W4Wm JWm%wmkwto 403a Cwrwt rate of ret r,M irlvod flan 1% of ill t1a gtft wrw* iptn Sri ftlrrn uM of ttow"hwa. PIIb�oNor pod dD yN wwVq 5IIm CWm% roto of muma Rived few 2%of Metie emu s"WI rwo.lpa anelor 1% of ar Co. mvwms town too pe .Athia Iknir of City Wobe I<r,rnofMoo. M T%w ttowth6m as rein"to M pm&A tlan in do City,oral wwe inra oW in wq mv*mn& lftw wr Mow WAOM trm Moron AAMte to Cyr Ad WA*Rmw.J* IN IM9 up6ted with Opme fmm the City Flnmw TMLE 5.1 h thgton beach planning division 37 Y r: k 1) AN +! gr4V# ca a 'ly hu a rpsp al petrolem fire capobillty, It Is ry WW tb fight structural flr+esr thereby pn wiring e9ka •"** to t!er Clty . ' req►l161, the i 1 t�. It � ;� OW )trees that we noImoly �� � t� fl showrh ob�awr Ir a "M WiP"eft of the oil t+pt i to this o mPony. r M.r �a1 na to tures to L�1 L%* C vI p. 137P 3 , Mqy IN4, Vedc !& .�. Alga tree leattemnj M., "Where y ib Money$" 184e4Wr 1963a pfi• �'• 3) Tim City rea+olva WOtiorhal one ml rewm a frrem the Mote of Ca11f orgIa L Camrniaelan to art percent of stateroyalties an tideland oll leome This fund Is (04) "$fate ail and Gas LeoseP, and was equal to aWaximately n 19 00. Howe w, time manles are not gonWal fund rrevenrsrs - Le. the � to be far pur ee simifled by the State. Threfare, they were not I��uded In calculartlans at on revenues. 4. 71' * State Bomd of Equollidlen rule US allows County assavors to reasess mineral rt tip valuctiam as oil prices rise. Since Pmptesltion 13 permits asmonmants of new carretruataan, the rule argm that an Increase In the prior of all the value of an all deposit such that 1t Is treater! as "now -construction". this rul ng Is currently under litigation and, for tine purpose of this deport, it Is cyesmed that the two �rewnf Molt an rowsewmwd applies to mineral ri is. Sluvid the courts rule in Brew olf fore Board of Equolieatlsn, City Revenues from property tons an mineral rights would be NOW than thase shown. � S) This Ap re was obtained from Mr, ChLick Kruper at the ararhge County Asseswes office. 6) 'Phis figure was obtained frwn Mr.Dan Brannan in the City t'irhorhos Department, 7) The number of wells cthmwted to the wastewater system was provided by Mr. Rick Grutnbourn,the City tail Inspecim. B} This f7Vre was obtained from the oil inspeiciorr Mr. Rick Crunbaum. V) This sparail le franchises rasparelble far these ea venues are ftwrt in TeNe B.1 of this sport. 1'he ft vwere obtained from Mr. Don Brent+ m of the Clty kinance rtnhdrtt. 10) in 1993, Swthwftt Exploration Company bepan to prodwo oii from wells in the #om of drectiarwlly dr filed to deposits u►Aw the ocean. When the State ftouvered Oda that yew) that 15Mhwest was °-4istIfV an oii pool in State Hdvlw4, It obtdnW a court order restraining Southwest from operating them wells. Tho 1938 State Lends Cmwvch elan Act specified terms under which productlan of tldelands deli alts mOd rew mho Hews%wt to reach the oil fiend from the townlot, On wells wwo drUkd under land ommad by the City, The City grc►rted Southwest Exploration r1lMs of way undw City sand ire an "Agrownont and Eamment for Right of Way*" In )dare ilk. This agro rent provides tlw City a monthly royalty "e Lwl to two �peerrearrt of natal r�ayalttee pa f to then State of Californicr for oil production an P IIc Res Ccxde V29 To"W States royalty is aWoWwooly 13 perowht of total edeq two perms of this Ohs Ctt,os royalty) Is .2642 percent. Aminoll, USA nuw 3g operates the wrells and po" the wyalty as speclf led In the apre nnont. 1 7 f g, Il� It d be ivied that other wal Wray woo different inflation=;he Howe t likely thast a dif I an M4 would ol9hlfimmly ;;Wj taM okalffs drdwrr frown ft"yalo. IM TIM Of r0wet rights 1a 125 pwcels In the fiawnlotMowntown area. It cn #�1 rrrer'y --bet is wow* lcen th (and Is soacWullp the City will l mm" ides etarnrd by its roirerol rich intereatt. The Ora" the►mite will *"M m the gLwOlty► of oil the profit an them on tie an of fhe to I interest In the project awned the City and the tery of t6 natlart C Wi Will rrt0 aooum" these factors are not ylot trtnawn0 the estlmMe of My revenues spawn In this scenario do rat include receiph from royalties petd by tht unit. 13) BAw(n S. Millit, In The xvivics of EmAromental OwIltys W. W. Norton Co., N.Y., I M P.P. Icy 1-14 , er oar' o T a he hedth WW property damn M Mon air pollution by using property values. W thoQry Is that romts ord ode value. of hwym will be lower In heovVy polluted areas, and that this r0lects t4 VOW - ago place on clea�nrsr air. This Oma y► could be coiled to the owthetle 4i'how tr all rattan In Muntington Beach. If it were, ow old expert rents and ty values of dwoilinp a4mont to oil wells to be lower than similar dwa►i"Imp elsewhse+e. This is a rea&* able expectation far which we how same prolirWnary evidsrn , &W a study of actual property values in Huntington Beach wsuid be most interesting. 10 See OCeastal Owrgy Impact Pr Wem" hepart, February, 19% City of Huntington 8900N Section OX0. • IS) ors Burcrpll, Robwt W«e owl David 1_lstokln, The Pisaai lm cEt Handbook, Canner for Urbon Policy Rosearah,Now Brunswich, NJ,'I I?15� p,p. I-10. lg) M this portlaulor cowl, the germ "public goad" b defined by Charley M. Tlebout In "A Purrs Theory of Lc=I Expetrditureet Journal of Political B (A, 1956, 416-24. as follows. ". . . a public good is one wNWskwld be plvduced6 but far which there b no faWbie enetkW of charging the camwnom* (p, 41 This eleflnition is se" in la"s of the prevIvA dluxi elan an %seigtrable vet. "ur i0rebi+se M% if one teade It wr "...o public good b one which should be pr+aduQed, 6�u! for Wtsh there k m feasible mothad of rrt urlrra ooth user% AMMELIN glnos 1 aosd r%W torts are than which un to meaurea nq T; OW-aaw+s denrsnd, their those which cannot be rrhsaeurrrd err "rsraMstVOIN r"« htswor, by the above deftnitlan, unassignablo oats can be thought of as expo datum fat' OPM10 . 17) Slee "final Report on the Dowleyprnent m pplIaMan of a land Use Fiscal InVxt lYieOMblogy or they City of Huntington h" Vol. i, Nownber, 1979, prepared by Ultraey stems, Inc. Irvine,CA, 18) The wells 1W cre located ran the platfa u affshor'e ere included In the total +Daunted as vil "units". This Is donee because offshore oil operations require arshore 94ppart faariiitias than should be aftwunted for In that analysis. One ego mpie is a asparestlon facility onshore than ie mod for Unian's offshore production, Anther eecempie b the helipal located onshore that the oil companies use to worry an their offshore opwotlont. The extwd of these anchors support activities Is aauneed to be reflwecrtwl in the number of *oils offshore. For tKi roomy, the offshore walls are emWeed art expanrdlture gonerating oil "units". 39 '"� " 1 -' f �,: 'fi'"Pi�'r' wlrc F��'Opa"tti��� � ,�, •, , �� �, �, .,, r �;, ,H i�/,�,,, if � �1�"i � i ^y�il iY i' s, �TSh ,r xr �-•;.��c��� ( �R� -r(iT�t i � +r��1'7�� ,,y �4( +7 i7�( • •'"' � � + ors �� 4�� r �, ��1���Ip�L,�.•� � S{,,,,r,,�`W,Y -+ �,k � � ..;F'`"T�� �W M r y M 'r w7.Mr,1-"!1 •7 h k �y .{1Y J� L`�s ',pTy,� 'J'` s `'�u�'F'M'••r-, ,1�� �'_ � 7 M 1*f�y;i� ��d p4C'�}S� •T s'Yr� n1 q�'I�,./D1 la `r Y ��'�� i^ + „F�,� f�fi' �a , �,� s , , ,S• �� � raw�"1� o. 4A',,r,;ilk{•`+ ,, ',� ";ram''. 1 d�� . :°',af FV 1re�nr id� dVft ces"W O Gaorp III. Ratter Sala taal Elam 36. „ t j%"ftjjp RgWl Chy of M ►tingliln&mO4 Rory, � 0. dwh►$. M11104 w1we Norton Co.,wt 1"3. «F' M peMrf a1 fhw laptr nt and 1la olon of a LmW Lhw Fiscal InVwt MothWWGW P 04W 111194Iafr", VOL 1t Itrasrot+rra, lnc., wpm mb , 1979. The h -met Ho Rabart WO Bwthal l and David L btaldn, Center for Urban Policy oA pwo Of Local EqwWlturses Ghorioo M. Tlebout, r L 91 PPolitiMl lemur �64r 4WZme Ow MY Spared Ift Mote" Goaroo M. Pattsr,ran, W ern � w � i l�3� i. 40 'SFr M�'i• r, ,:� '+{S'�G�r�iy,111?,�5��4� � ,�..'F. � „r �;AM1q ���'' �' ',d' r ♦ � � i� � .�i�.� • y � i�� �: ra � � . �rr•�,r v� ����A 7,is���k�s � ��� ��n �� �� ���. .! { ;��.��,,;�''��, 'C�r� �'� �T +�q���'� ���,'�,�� 1' 'FF�4 f 1 i 4 ;!� I f Y r�ar�� ��iW I'�� �,),T• r " � � � � � i fI ♦ a." �' •� � „r�'a;. Air �� ��V Fi�t�r��. r,,'• � .')��A'Y � '•4 ' � �1 � "`'� � � , •* ,' � .•rr,� C�.uw� �, A �rr�,1 .vTIT�T�i?��k�."7•iHej�; �. �. otbw bm ' "AWmW k*r FbW Yew 18?96WO City of F Orkin an 90fths Owl i�rtir n Bs�h �im�nir� t� mw*v IMp fir + ► Q*wW Pjwd Bod Stowid Rowl"t Hw*lt*,m Bich Planning r; QIM!pi w A1i � `I i1Mr� 1l7 lei 0*1npton teach Cr wol PWO l' portr'mont of D 4*loprmmt 11 '4�iorrrNiIV Elwi wA Bend Mopes r, Fw*hgton Beech Plaming trr�nt, Augural, I"rf. '''LAW UN FIrremw 0-1", Huntingu n Boocah trnent of i i t So'vios±arkmwy, I M. I rMo �ltur L Amly* of &W t,Mas!�, t�l W199ton bmch Pl MIM DVO 11 hnntr r "1976 Fmm m ollwermdlturo Analysis of L oW tit", Huntingto Booth Picming DoWmmto 'rt r t6m owl 1r�tltuto Poor of Ado 011C wt re city of l� mtkgftn Boxh, , 1 b 41 /y ♦. � , "�•Y •�� ' :M� A�i(.tt.�l �' M v\�` A' ''. i, 7'�� � Y1: a•�f'°� rA ••, � `� _�, � A♦. . t , ;-. •.�;h„rf + „ .� +� ..� {�y 'rJ� y'�)' N�' �Y t�� ±. A♦��T '.:x• �y1 •sa4 ,:�[ ,r " •;R r - ar ' � 4 �'�! /F )Y�y •i;r,1"� �- t t� ;.. t •L-lJ �, 1 1°'1�#. . _ • .�•.t + •t��-.,r r�.• 1'1 �, •r- �t - � `�Y tom. � ,�. i. �'�: 1 • ► , �'�+/1 nd�'�.!�,¢q_ +4t t;.. rr..;li� . to,•4,,:y .,' dF"� :'�°_ R ,.I�': •',.. y� ti I. .H ii�Y• { '•I �y s 71ti t` '�@rr J 1 r b 1 b tY -Y [ F 4 [ •r , 1 [ 7-771 Y 1 {.ef ti' ( -7F, , 7 4, , - -, , �.4�'4 7, w7el ;7 IL 40:1 , �M. � a �'..t AI 1y .��l�.rl 'YOI. . f Y 4,��;� 'fY �, .+:p �11 k 4" -10 �, ITIZKNS FOR PAUMPNIGTON SUCH Mimi qW111000=0-00-0--4-i -i i rITY OF F,S Ar q. Nov 15 City. of t1witit&9ton !3wacli Council Member 2000 Main 51tract IIUAtAArJL0A Beach, CA 91648 14t ANOUS *I--oTA0L2tM COUOBATI014 OIL Re4covary Project No. as-U/U83 Permit No. 89 -215 ZnzlosUtcts a ( 1 ) A letter siibmitted by Mary Parrish, ror C .C .U .B. ( .2) Chamber �ruup, 1xic. - Review and coitutieuts on the Notice of Preparation and Lnitiai Study for Draft SEIR for Proposed Spriti9field Area Oil Recovery Project . June 1988 . (3) Not!= of Preparation of I)rafL Supplemental 11 E. I .P. No. 86-1 from Department of commulu ty (4) Enviconmental Checklist rarm Datacl-.- April 4,, 1.986 DIGOwssion of SnVironatental EvaluatiOlk 0 ) A 'letter subMitted by Mary Parrish , Treasurer for C.C .B.D. ( 6 ) ReVlaw of Drakt Supplemental B. I .R . fur the klgu4; U11 Recovery Project, SCII No . 86040917 . Prepaxed kay: Chambers GrQupr Inc . September 1988 . 1 . "Ungrhttle Council Vha taCIOSUres containe-i hereir, are respectfully submitted to t.ha Cijy Counal-I by Coiiceraed Citizens for fluntingtein Heacli (CCIIB ) for the Counaills inCoxinatIon and review relative to it ' s considurAtion of the referenced pxjject. The information is iatended to casist the CouLacil In Ws deliberations and to furthex sulidt-' Atiato the residents ' curitention of Lhe inadvis- ability of allcowing Anquo Petroleum Corporation to conduct oil drilling operat-ton5 iin the middle of a residential neig I hboxhood as dejuciabuu` by ?*one Change Nu . 08-11 , POST WICE BOX 5= HUNTI N UT011111 BEACH, CAM .-'ORN iA 92615 AMr ,. , r i y ,yr}yr, }� a o.• y�� � %Sh ti S'r r Y, i �� R�?f'(1 M 1 � ,�7,4 Y, `�,1 r• F� �,r r 1 Y IyyC. ..�} � r +• 'r.�t'.;- {�'h1Y� irr•fi,� 4�1 {. ,jpY �yy1�' ,� �tj'•,�}IAh,SyG AS k ,l�i1 ¢y4i�u1 ?% r'/..r #•"�' ''"pN +�,�y, lW�liry �. r° F `� i<h All. '.i��r,"7.^_ ��• �r4�.T 'r. rr V Ay l r '1.' T i riY +w`i � ,�: � r ^ d,1 .r It:�r,�,�„ r, .iv ti. ���}•�.�( '��� 1 �� E • � � '� � �4�,�Y•' •k i�i .. r41 'R!;P �r '� itr r �r ��,L•1'; 1� r I ba , � I y: •i, •� �. '^�'i�F'' y �, 4, 1r Cp �+ �h.P ^�r,,,, ,�w�� '�/• �". � y,,Y1w. I. .'i � .�9','1, � ..R• •' �,�+;p�r ` +d' y'' . � 1.{'.. 0"f'1.�` ^.iR a;d'`F _. .�wa /j.:"y kr r r r ',;' Y /W.b� '�r•ai 711 &IM1 P1Ole , hl.,.�•, 7` + r i � •.1�• •ail„ City of Huntington Beach Council Member MovWaber 41 1988 #ager Two 1 haw.; At c idexAble expenses f o it' s membership, C.C.H.B. has retained k' the asevioss of W�„1 OA&A ASIntly ggali f ied environmental consulting file+, 'The C�amber�i Itl v i tr, �rrovide technical expertise to aunt Anque Bdtrcleeums Proposed Project. This cha►mbe3+:s Group, 4'nc . , which specializes in the preparationof gaviroimental fmpaLct Ite.ports for the gas and oil industry, has prerpAted an 3'.ndebperdent evaluation of. the Angus petroleum Corporation Enviranm Atal Impact Report in Enclosure ( 2 ) and ( 6 ) . This report identifies serious deficiencies in the .E. I .:1. submitted to the City -'.)y &uqus . As indicated , the E.I.R. sloes not adheres to the minimum tequiremernts as establi!ahe d by the California Environmental qusli•ty Act, and tb*refore, should be rejected by the Council Concerned Cil-Lze as for Huntington Beach hopo that you will study thia issues before you with great concern and reject 6uppl snt -E.,I.A. , deny, Zones Change 86-11 and use permit 88-25 . If you should require any further clarification, or have any• question% concerning this, mutter, please foal free to contact the undersigned at ( 714 ) 960- 8796 . M**t- pe3ctfull.y, it ,• ,��':�--- yt,,'�,� Ile �,� T+►� FiAn fl c(Wca"001 CITIZ FOR HUNTINGTON BEACH 4 Presidernt. � ,,, ioeuse� �Xr '! 4•,��,„- i 1 i,y N �r ti•' � ft:S�, d 'f ��I'Jl. ' ;�•,i � �jl } t,q, �,�G iv. .v�� l r y��� 1 W��y "'�w Tw ly I�i M�, F ,�t , ' .p ,��$4"��' �'�`,� j'''yy��f( y��'�,�+ ,� -1 •'�°\•'*', lr � � ��j�'.`;�y *Jy }+r R f ,'� .\r r 'i ;�•'` '•� '.4��1 N'.�M;..i'{/a')'t• r� �,• .,1 10�R"�: b �. r r ;, ,:.,5~•_� ''.a�;','�,'�.',,,' t' � .' �' '� ➢eta aw ti �, �4 '�i.' ' r ,� �'v..'t ' ` '. r R 'S �, I ~ Ate• R � *� 1 x �,•„F,+ .,}�y� y n�,, .�. ri r r � � ,5• i � .r_('ILN(,� .. ,,' ,R h 1� �y ',��• . �'4� �J!"!� r it•1 "F ��=�'1Y;''dMl� ✓�..�1 R.,AMti:'nM'"r'b''S" i >r V r {,F , i,, '11f�� •� '�.V I fk, . NCWBUU � _ 7 .4hX /MSS l��!► �.�7N i 4k�'; ' rt�y�J1 ���FIE,�� ;~ �.►MI'��,►M�'II�r .,Lr r. +.1 1' 'i' 1�`'I'1, y i :',,f,�Ifs`' •, R 4_ 1 F { ti I f y a 7r7°d yi ' k1 y, a r i ",°psi�.���1 a'•.. . �'rt 'r�� y' ',1 r d; r June 27, 1 1919 Aleuna Lane Huntington Peach, CA 92648 CITY Op RUTING" M CK ARIBMT OF OOMMITX p$V=PMM r: A": Qasbaftu* O'Ham r Nor MM 006M Us Draft Supplsmwntal Impact Re�art go. 88-1 In reply to your letter received June 30 19d8, we would like to bring to your attenti,an the esporienaet wo have had in our neighborhood from the adtirities of Angus Fotsolem Corporation in their proposed Springfield Area 01.1. Recovery pzv jest. ' Tm following eventr took place and are on record at the City of Rueittogton Resoh$ (1) buying operations, the eltieene were subjected to noise hazards; levels at #1 Decibels one day and at 72 Decibels wwther day. (2) Thus has been no sib of my' form of � control,. The citizens have Man sub3ooted to ba sarde of dust during tb�o tremy (it work is the s after Odtobrx 1, I"? and since our injunction to stop the project, dated February 18, 190. Contra to Argue prom* r oUaees, CONCBRM CITUMS ,sm?,v ref eed to s1 ow Angus to put in streets and sidewalks in the rare*. We—ca-ly denied their proposod 8 - foot wall which. in not allowed by the Cower=ta and Restrictions do Angtee lots oral adjoining late in Tract VIS'1',A M Ml Iota 1 ihrougte 20, Block 1803, at al. ' (3) At Celifbim's► and Springfield Staresta, the citizens experienced a fire and woke inWation. This block is for all oil storage in the proposed ��'►�ia1i. (4) The heav7 tMk trai'fia during the period of time quoted in (2) it far We thm a nsidential area a= ablds o 1kid you know that +Aese heavy r -da*y Uvoke use *9 entrance on Delaware $treat where the school bus picks up our ottiux`Mrn to V to SabaolV ,N t% On Qalil"oraia and Rochester Btreets, there was a =Jor disrupteant of electrical services for mix hours, damages were p+eid by Argue. : T W*" MCI% we Maly the "tip of tho iceberg" for our neigfiboxt ood. We are enaloe a formal envircmmenta2 report re y �i PC prepared for us b Mr. .S'04 !. Iledt rei.er, ORMOM OHM, X10* gams Afto CalMornia. 1►ery, truly ro r + � 1Mary%. psrriah Tretururer Iva COlt4REiABD IT12 Is FOR HMT1NGT N BMH CC t John lea tirmeior .-�. Joan Be Madook, .Attozmy r 1 .+ �1 X -1A� y r.: + �•F M f ! .,�P.�7,., ' - 'fa � r rafj t y ,y 'A" y'�i��:F ". M►y , ` IOeM ',�9� I �+ r n•�� 1� ' yr`I .11� f.��G'� :.� t.. 1 � � �I,� ,1 .�+�j,1��Y ,�,' .1.�, �� '• .^. � r�yF,I���,FItIJ .,' �� •:my+�J '. •', ',�''A 1•' ! •1 1 �i � ,I,,�9'i � i'�V„��q7 �r �' � ^�k7 �i 1+` �l 4 r ,. R r 1 1. � r, i ,,!,y�� T i rl Yr' h yr�y- • M•�� b,� '� �� � � �9 �' ��a,J �-�"•4, !�Ty 1�#' 'r `�rr l � � Y- �.•A C ���•�. ilA��l/t�"^r"�}, v,oyl, ���i I� " + ^ i�F �� �; �Ir � 1 7"M1 ;nli �',•� � r ;r d �� f ' ��. r��,` .Flo`�1r�? f y .r'V „+1 �d y A ( o f " I `i 1 �f r•' YI` N':,h, }r "� ` '1. G n ti M ! r 1 w a•y i1 r Y ram" � 1 .�11 � y' ♦ I� �SA� 17 ,11 � �r y Iru � ` ,f � !�, •^ ' r Il �u .•'y4 �r,� ''F •�4r+•';.N�+r:,! !ri $y""r•nr,r�1.hr.gCa'.`ri:rq,v,'. r tir . :,'i li' ON TUN UMIC2 oP P AUT.To i Mm XN.T TUL STUDY FOR BRA" 8PUM POR PRQ 2 SPRI"IM oxto PRwwr. jugs 1908 k , ,n i r f, r ;i 4 i y 4��.., (,�,j I F I—,..` •'��,•', 5".ii�y '��i;''';�,Y �� �"y'jTq�"•o�•R�pl���i;'��',Y'� ;r u,� '�M''*J• *°'71���,' y r ..—� 1 '� { A µ Y� r •1 nr r , 1 !, r 4!' 1to yy j y JJ// �, //!! ,y F 1 •F1• 1 1 • � 1 IT h Y '�•` INuIl,�n_� ; ,•�t��W, f�5 `+� �` �,'��� Aft; '�2;M eY� fACIV, it ig i'"�4�`�j,,,,�✓' �y,,�*��t�4�Y+.�`� ,I �,,4��' ''�;" 1 nr!,r�, 1R��1E1.`,�� �l �J'Isy'. s � } � .�R�+n��' �� ��'•1 ' i 1� �+l$r;`�'�,��, .,, ! M. ,�'� fi,, ,My rF 11'' '.w iL. 4,"�, Y• '- 1 i'F};v I �, 1�' r .dot �, `` A,o. «. ,•l t +• rti!V'.ve9l i!��,�•,��.� � Fur, �� , • , ,h„: � � •;�; .� ,� M'y , ,10 i•y;,j$.yn� :,0. n n�` �� S�C dan.,0r/' s� , ' I �•y 1, . . 1 r�� rh µ� r�yly ell Tm ti r !` rl« 'C'w y..1 v. , IM ' •�+i.ti �� ! i, i �yMr�yal„• Y yl� r ,'. « Jt�e�u's��f�d/NMir+... • {.-pl ...h•r ���...�.�� � �:� :. ��. �`- :: � ��� �.e,� �.� 4 � r 1 , '-•,iY :1�.� �n � .����� �•� � ��� � it �� •y ry • . f i Y^ 4� ANVXXW AWa COMKMT r F ' NOTIC9 OF riUPARATION ARID IIKITZ" STMY I 8`OR PROP0320 BPAINUMV AREA OIL RNCOVZXY PROJECT Submitted bxs CONCNRNND C=Tlzxms OP TINCIT BN CR 1 , �r Irl� F 1 , Ma 1988 4• j r. J i l yt� 7�1, � _`+ +*41'l�yL+y ,r n .�.__ ' A• } ` :' r„yl(,•'" lid ' kl 4 4- AC Pot `•may y +. ��` d 4Y . I ' Fy. "1 . I{_.�„ YC� " + A - .• +,�: Wcnf c.Y%n� , ,I' �gRItiOP��LO ARIA OIL RPCOVZRY PROJECT XOTIC6 OF FRZFARRTION SCOPING C011UNTS •,ti ,�• I1DIRODUCTION • I Thisp, (teoullsent provides review and comment oA% the Notice of �,repaera tten and Initial Study issued by the City of Huntington 11e4ko# gear the Graft Supplemental tnvironmental Impact le port for the proposed Springfield Area Oil Recovery pr'uject . While we agree with tho City' s position that a Supplemental 2I1 is rrequired, we have concerns that the attached Initial Steady does not identifyy all potential significant impacts . Additionally, we have providred direction as to the scope of issues that are required to be addressed in detain . it should be noted that this review snould be considered preliminary in nature, and that additional concerns could surface during review of the Draft muIPPlesrental 2IR. w This review is divided into three sections . The first section r` identifies a6ditional items on the environmental checklist that my be significant and should be addressed in the ZYlt. The Htovnd section provides a discussion of the general topics that should be addressed in the CIA and Section 3 addresses some of tht specific issues that were not adequately addressed in the p.revL*us Sill prepared for the proposed project . 1 r,•1, I' I', 1 •i 1� r ' 0 , " h•.Wry rFri."+ 'r "tiY .1 S '•i • '• '. ' 7 1 y +1 V MyI I, i SSCT10N 1 IMITZAL STUDY caANgNTs We have the f ollvvin comments on the environmental Checklist issued as a portion 0 the Initial, Study. Reference is wade to the Specific items on that checklist . g. relates to potential changes in geologic substructures . Waterflooding opsca►tian• for oil recovery projects may impact such substructure* and should be addressed . item l.o. refers to changes to the grour,J surface . Clearing and Is-liltnq of the drilling and production sites will change the round surface . Additionally there is a potential for subsidence prom drilling activities. Therefore this item should be changed to the "maybe`' column. Item 1.e, This should be chocked in the "maybe " column because err* s a potential that oil spills or other releases of toxic materials could reach the ocean or other drainages vie storm ' gains, street gutters or sanitary sewers . a • h. If city water is used for a portion of the water oa n ""'project, there may be an impact on the amount of avaiisb a water for the City, especially in light of the current drought' ea 4 .a. and Item 5.0. Oil spills and release of other toxic ma er a`I' may impact plant and animal species in the coastal areas of the City. Item to.&# Thor@ will be a potential for fire and explosion; Ehis s ou d be played in the "yes" column rather than the "maybe" column . Ices 11 .c, refers to the potential for increased governmental se re oea In th ace& of schools . As di.seusstd mace fully in Section •l, '(Cuftu atLve impacts ) below, the " freeing up" for future development at land currently encumbered by oil and gas facilities could potentially impact school facilities due to . feature population increases. We beli,eve that all four mandatory findings of , t coo should be checked "yes'" since both the Project , ' n ciftc and cuatulattive affects of the proposed project would be t: # �ni�ica�ptt. I 2 4 � ,e '/ Ip, *�'��Aid+' + ,.,•, ,++`i _A,� J._. , '••«i��s�'�t� r �. 44Zy) • •>F1Pw� { ,4 rW vy•F� � +�, ! � «k Y� /�A r, •.� !„.n�1r11. r'w!. , � ' '� •i.1, � '1A • �1,lee,7,'j.���i�! '','�� �,•• "yrMS'�:.r'�.'.^' 'li�1f� r • " 83SIXON 1 - xggvxRaD TOPICS TO 88 ADDRX53XV The Draft NIt that was previously prepared for this project did not$ R a 1. address several iaportant CXQA required topics* A i � short000Lngs of the previous document was its usicy 9A cif J"ternativss . At a SWUM, the UIR th• rltrrr �e�ltresalysis r o Altktna tiva methods of recovery of the oil and gas resources, ' inaludling us* and/or expansion of existing facilities . Vs ,, .dot aittru$tivt dtillsites and production sites, indludin ' a Urgtc number of ssmller sass aites , and the relocation of the "production site to an area already dedicated to coil prddt etion purposes , *.U, , $holes facility or Chevron' s facility. r, o The potential of revorking existing wills for use as laJoctors/new producers , with production and gathering lines �. rotted to an existing production area. o Altstriative uses of the - proposed project sites , The previous Bra was lacking in its discussion of the cumulative impacts of the pro aced project. An analysis of cu�srtlative is*pacts should i clu c x ' o axisting oil and gas op*rations in Huntington Beach, and the oerators, future J un+s for a time period equal to the life of tills,, project. Th should include in�9epindent operators and majorpf •rey o foi$sible develo ,nt sortriarios for tho lands "Lreed-up" from that ercutherance of surfaca oil and qas facilities . such an alutlyiis should a+idreas the entire *Mope of impacts resulting gross ultinate development_ of all such .ands, based not only on current %*ataq but also an the worst-case ( i .e . , most int.easive) , future development scenarios. Issues of Oristary 'r coAceft e►o6ld be traffic, Jublic -setvices and utilities , air quglityr population WA sooeaonomics. f film p0evious UK was also larking in the detailx of the proposed ;. 961010t, in partidul,arr information regarding oil rang ttats ano waste disposal and water requirements were not provi d Ln sufficient detail . 3 1 rw n� '4, l• •'1 .M1' u All C I ' h dF �,l = 1tRRUZRCD TpsIC_$ TO BE JLrDRXBBND r Drpft XIM that was previously prepared for this project did Wot ad*quatei address several important CRQA required topics . ase r nt t'Ue primary shortcomings of the previous document was its {" ons fy dlsoWssea of Alf te�criativee:. At a vri nmum, the sRYR f rh 1solmde in the Alternatives Analysis : o Alternative methods of recovery of the oil and gas resources, iacludina use lid/or expansionof existing facilities . o Use of alternative drillsites And production sites , indludin a larger number of saoller size sites , and the relocation the produation site to an area already dedicated to oi1 �roduction purposes, e.g. , shsll ' s facility or Chevron' s �reiYity. o The potential of reworking exlxting wells for upe as Injectors/now producers, with production and gathering lines c routed to an existing production area. o Alternative uses of than proposed project sites . The previous sfa was lacking in its discussion of the cumulative impaots of the propposed project. M analysis of cumulative Impgats should include: ` 0 RxiSting Oil and gas operations in Huntington Beach, and the o eratord' future plans for a time period equal to the life of t is project , This should include independent operators And '• na.,j�►r prodv►ceers. • 0 Pq;R ,1� development scenarios for then lands "!reed--u ;" fcoo t 04 bsrdnce of Ourfade oil and gar facilities. Such an i 1 ld should address the entire scope of impacts resulting fVO4 isItA46to development of all such lands, based not onl ore oetiftilt si binq but also on the worst-caste ( 1 .e. , lost ihtensive) , future development scenarios. issues of primary f rn wwold be .traffic, public services and utilities, air � •t�, �rulatsas �� socoechnomic*. ,W I#us Oft rags 014P lackin'9 in the details of the proposed fto 06; Yn r p►sirticuler, information regarding all radCrtationi, vast* disposal and water, requirements were not preyd in suicient derail . 3 N � �' rn, t\- , a ',W • :dye � ! , '�jA•. I ,`, 1 J;lu,bry,1 `'„1� ,y�r"YV1, r'',,t � . ,{I �i , , 1 ',• ,, ;'�' . I „1ti,, rJ�lf r, V 1 . i � , .' Y,A', ✓•+ M � . ,ry rlti I r W. or r: L ' px spaaif , i pets that should be fully addressed include not 11lated to tbo followings yl aa►l, l asts juelc4la potential sabeidenao ar uplift r r< ., � opo,go l�onst induced seisaioit j and ropttssnri*ation of The oil t%. t6d si40 tin in ml ration of gas fron abandoned gg g iactss both for normal site runclf and x` jetontLa all spill impact areas due to pipeline/tank/bers allure. This analysis should include a description of where a!i would flog if a tank veto ruptured and the retaining dikes did not hold as will as providing an oil spill contingency h: plan, , cs,, �I I. q Air quality impacts for the construction, drilling and a era»& ttonarl hssoa of the ro ect should be calculated. Addi ion- tl ,# tct iaaptats of o emissions such as bansene from the ezvwU oil should be calculated ac:ardinq to Ji►Rs guidelines . o &0W else impacts# specifically in regard to compatibility with , Citesappproved land uses and compatibility with existing CCalas, should be addressed In detail* o CgIllelptilr' :aEtion, Supacts, fox surface impacts phase-bye hase and v«. ar►d for tsMn* ottation of reduced oil , whether by h at 1pip*jino no*$ to be addressed in detr.il. I by pioellsof include such factors as sisal, ag9e ( if existing) , route, current use, potential rupture iSpect area, and destination. !R A 404 6jrgt&mv safety analysis should be p.cov'ided for, all �d a�: ', th4l proposed ro ect. This ono*ysis; should include, . ,� �Al� ph# rd footprints from r+tdrago tanks and "Oil of b for fire 0 iarni , haatt) , explosion, and role*$* of toxic a. An oil spill contingency plan, safety plan and a rarity plan should also be provided far review in the Draft six. v A full visual impact analysis should be provided fe r the proposed project including artist' s renderings and site prafilow . I+r 1,1 , r ,'1 � ` `* Y :v"w+' + y�tirY ." •I` ,, ( l '�Mr , �ti,' r Mq,W'i*,4 Rf L, SY { Fr, . r l r ` • ,yyy ' S f"V Si f j.. MY u :� k i KK? , Y1 ,{il y ✓'>.S A': a 1•.i Y 4 r 'r � rj! tiF iY / liY �� a11 l iV rlRr_!'ym M'' Y .1y 41i .. 1 l a •' V 1+ 1 1`1 y1, T i OL W ITT 'Ail I A. J. o In a ltlon to a lull noise analysis , a detailed brat ion IM1 0 as „ecisted with the drilling phase should be is study should Include the rams and degcee of err* rsg$dsn**s so well as the potential to damage uros ( 04,94 or*Ck*d 0164ter and osheht , *to, ) , ;'.4 ' i gp lass inpaats, inalw41ing firer, police , storm drain ,;; �.. + � dmiranitst �rerrl�r s st !full *nsl sus �h �. lle service isr►p*ets associated with ropes pr* '�ber* d be prhvided with s0*dial e* h�►stsa*�►s► ilitJiVt es of the firer department to control a fire is alas* proximity to resider+�M*. . a Water supply system impacts. A full impact analysis of voter use for each phase of the PrOP9644 project should be rovided. to particular, the use of domestic Motor tat water Flooding should be addressed. o , Impacts to wastewater treatment system*, including the di 6posaY of bciaes . A full anal pis of the wastes 'produced, proposed disposal method* end treatment requirements should be provided to the *like ` 5 - R J 1 fi. i w .N ry�pa a ry( ' � !• /�i r+y�« ,: f1�vYf �y',I�y fs,,4� a r� 'h-y,�IT} 1���:, d � r� t ,r � R �•� fF .1•.1 �� r i �li ��� ,m 1 �J s eft �n'� 1p���!yk4Yr��fL�s�t �J�T 1 y . r� 1� Ir i«P �r IIA� ,` �• rla ry ��1 "�t�1�tiY l My���),'1T 1 ,1ti v�r i L1 i�r�. �Y - �`, ��1 �'�� °'Y M ~' � �R� 1 *;�� /IH} IY^\"-'F � ,( d� .i�� � 1-t�, e, +�1 1- 4. f p I...rjy + ,.1 � ��,7y`c�. F' r /v�T .. �'. •, IV 11 lV �� �f• �✓Y ' ��/i ��ny��,��1 ��r/ 1 ��,.�ti�• k�'lr � 1 / 'r r Y ' 'a1 �(���y�^r MliA •I A V 9 �y 1� E �y r:��,ti�� �1 t i Il 1 M �� 1�•�+ 111'r' L�� �� 1 �•.� N�r,'M'`�j� I 1 r i► *� � � i� 1 il' �, ;, , :',, ,,, I /.y?�(�44Y'«p ,ly� Y.rl 1 1��'` r14.'` y�.�,�'« �• "�♦,.�11V�'�,,•,.M�1;"'/� �ldl Tr' ".�T^:'��'n ;Iy1R.�i r rl s,'�r !•/5�;�;/7{7 � +o/'*r'1k',,,./ rs 1, ICX 4F P A1TXON OF ]DRAFT sung '!"" 06I.R. no. 86-1 FROM D fm ON CDNN=ITY DBVRLOPNl " 1 1 i, "v, ''•Ir, rye, l 1 1 r 'I tY . 1} r li V 4 No? 75 IN '6 st City if Huntington B' each me"IN Motor UM IDBMVINW OF WW*MffY (NIVELOMOT IL June 19P Cordw"d Citimens for 2:0 Seats Mores Boulevard 84"AWW402 Saou Mbalce, CA 90401 3VAINCri NOTICK OF PREPARATION OF DRAFT SUPPLEMENTAL SNVIROMMENTAL IMPACT WORT NO. 88-1 Tb6 City of Huntington Reach will be the load agency In preparing a Supplemental A- '*#twig eatal ovact Rewt for Answ Petroleum Corporationli proposed Springfield Ai* 6 RAPptojent. We IMW ta,a=v Ow views of responsiblesfwnclex Wo to the and canume or the swirmMental Infanuation which I& gsriaane to the alone-I& Its , 4billitles in motion with thatpkjKwed pro ant. These agermlex will I to IN=150MIeniental Envimmental Imps.et Resort t5E.1R) oxf previously prop* J1t **m q pin ideriq pwmits cv. otWr appmvels for the pmjeat. linmWItIdnto ' the YWm at Up"alble drociallo City.4 golialting the views or coweraw atilaw, "Alatione and Intowted 0, so to Infwmad.an *bier should be IncludeJ In the suppleiment to ON pftvt"ly ed. 111L Tice om*t jWc9VtW9 kmt1w mW potential siviromental Impacts are contained In the attxd motes, b" to the 040.Halto mar*ted by State law, your response must be teat at tM ewflut poeAle date. !rjt' 'dot titer than 30 da ys efler receipt of this rioticei NOW MW MW rl arwtwr to the attention of Catherine O'Hkra at the addresinoted Owes al=4 with tW ,%ae of a contact pen= In yoor agemy rr orpnizadon. Oil Aulowt Plamw (714) S36-5271 CM01" (009d) y' ENCLOSURE ( 4 ) t:JVXRONM]CNTdm,L f:LECKLISiT F020M DATEW ARIL C . 1986 VISCUS510M GF ENVIRONMENTAL. EVALUATION I I i ,r , F M� APPENyam+ + IX NViRON'l1v E TAL aiF-C:x.fs•i' F opw (To Ea Complated By Lecd 1. F�Oc�Cgrour�l I , Plums at Pro,pcnent Angus Pet rc i eum C onrany I. A dd rar w cP+d Phor►e Murnber of p rot".cx+en4 t 406s Denver wts t Fark +xa Cool dcm , Colorado 80401 3. C tv of Chr,:k lix t 5vbmit ted Ao r 1 1 49 1986 ,._,.,�......_..,�.._....�� P-111* v: Roquir'.mg Gheeklht C i t y of tiun t i ng t can Clench N.-Ma of PrcpcszIf if applicoble Spr•in•gf i efd AeeA 01 1 Rtcovery► Proj ect it 4 �tYv4ror+mmrR:a� i rrypas~is • M"lenotionsi of all "Yes" crvl "maybe" answers cre :•etiuired on ottcc�cd soheet ) Yes maybe NO 1. Earth. 'Will tha prgxwl resul* In; a, Owtebiar acrth aanditicns or in rwhcrges in lqarotagic xutastr turns? x b. v iww t icro, d isol ccarnen ts, corrpcc t ion or awcrcov ar•ing of We soil? ..... ......... c. Chc p ',► topag rcphy or g rouno. sur f ac e 4. `I h,# des true t,'om, corner irg or mc l f icot ian of Ov unkW* gooialis or physical features:' ..�...... _..�.._ ...�.i e. Any iverease in *rind ar watrrr erosion of sails, tither an or off the Litt? X t. Cl"os in ftesition or erosion 6( beach INEW9, at as in *11tatio i, &pwatition or oraston whkh mW Rwdiy the dwwoi of a irjvrtr or st w the 04w of dw 0000rr or X dam► x ir,ley dr wk*? f w wowo 1 Yes Na q. Exposure of people Of property to geolo- gic hazards such as earthquc:kes. landslides, rwdslides, ground fditure, or similar heze.7d's? X 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: i a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration k of an-bienti-air quality? b. The :rection of objectiombie odors? c. Alteration of air movement, rrnisture, or ;. terperature, oe any chaMe in climate, either locally or regionally? X 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: � o. Changis in current;, or the -course of di- reotian of water rmvements, in either X rnor; a or fresh waters? b. Changes in cbsorptlon rates, droinege pct- ter% or the rate end ornuunt of surface F rurro ff" _..�_ X .._ �.�. a g Alterations to the course or Maw of flood waters? X •r. ter. ._iw•r_ ..��_ d. Charge in tl.* amount of surface water in any wa b e. body? X e. O ischarge into sor face weters, or in any alteration of surf cce water queli ty, in- cluding but not Urnited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direvior or rate of flow of ioround waters? y q. Chcrgo in the quantity of ground waters, •3;: either thmogh direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X ,fir h. Substantial redo tan in the arnountr of • Water Ottherwise ayailobie for public water X '�' svpp hes Expaje re Of people at property to water re- lcte�d hourds smh as flooding or tidal waves? X 310 ' 1 �' ' .�� •YWf':•.1+.e y '•,iti'•. .J"� `r�''N 'IJ: .. .. _—. —�._�..�.��. - ...yr.r,yr�...f•r•�IY .1 4 t 1 Yes MC_b* Pic 4. Plant Life. Will the prow-if revilt in: a. Chcnga in the diversity of species, or nurrbox of arf sp:-cicss of plants (including s trees, Oi Pjbs, grwA, crcps, crd cgwtic X b. Reduction of the nun-bers of ac,y unique, rare -or sndcngored soocies of plants' e. lntrot:kction of nmew species of plents into en area, or in a barrier to the normal X rrtplen ishment of enistaig specks? d. Reeuction in ocreage of eny agricultural X Crop? S. annual life. 'eyi+l tre pi aposal result in: a. Charge in 1.40 diversity of species, or numbers of am species of animals (binds, iar+d animals including reptiles, fij.S cnd X shellfish, benthic organism or insects)? b. Recluc;t ion Of the rw rrbers of any un igve, rare or endcrgared species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an cw*a, or result in o be rr ier to the X migration or nawment of a'tirrek? d. Oetefioratia^ to existing fish or wildlife X habitat? 4. NWOL Will the proposal rosolt in: a. Incrooms in existing noise levels? X b. E sur* of people to severe noise levels? _Mwwmlm•,_ •,rx;,,r i. • Light &W Glare. Will tna proposal produce X nee► 14ht V gtoto? S. Loral Tsar. Will the proposal result to a sub- stantlel alteit► flen of the present or planned la4. . 'Qf to arena? X to Nowd I Will that proposal result ins a4 trtcrafts ki !ht rate of use of any ftfural ^=WON? X 311 . a 1 ' . f w 1 . � mow' b. o Substantial depletion of wy nonrenvochle natural resource? 10. ' Rhk of Upset. Will ttm proposal lnwlyet a. A risk of an explcssion :,r the release ' of hazardous stibstarwvs (Includirg, but not tirnitod to. oil, pesticidos, +chemirols of radiation) in the rvemt of an accident or utsse t +cw%d kwm? X b. Pouible interference with an srrxrgency II rompo use orlon or an errwrgency rywvatior ' plan? 11. Populatim Will fhe praptsal vl;er !ha Oocation, ,9istribution. density, growth rate of We X hurncn population of an aura? . 12. Hmaing. Will the proposci ofsect existing hm-s- x irag, or cveata a demesne. for cddit ional housing? i 13. Trcngwtat:mICirculatic.i. Will the propaeal result ins ,. ' a. Ctneration of PiLstential additioncl x i 4* vehicular rravement? . b. Effects an existing parking facilities, or X demand for mew parking? c. Swbstantiol impart upam existing trar"tspor- X tali*" sy ss nu? �.. ........, jI. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movtmant of pule arwior goa4? o. Alterations to wotorbarne, rail or air traffic? X f.,i Increase im Imf fie h ttards to orator ve"cles, bicyctlsts or pstkstrims? X 14. Public "Will ttv pr000sa1 have Cn off ec t spare, or retry!t in a neod far raw or ofterW Sovemmental services in any of this 0. fire preteetlan? X ;' Msoiko protetian? X C. "IS? X -a- wow- t �12 I Yes Mcr� d. Parks or other recreational fccilities? X e. Micinten,2nce of public faei fi ties, ir+r:!udinq tc�cds�' X f, Other governm"tal services? x 15, Emeryy. Will the proposal result int a. Use of Mstcrntiol amounts of fuel or energy' b. Substant-ecl in+crecsa In r.Semand upon exist- Iml savre csc of energy• or require t"e dommlopmemr of rww sources of energy? x I Utilities. Will the prooasol result In a need for new systems, or subs iwlal operations to the faliowiruj utilitiest a. P-,wer air matvrai gcs? x C. COM.M)M Ications systems? x c. 'Motor? x ,t : ►..� d. Sewer or septic tenses?' e. 5 tort n water dt+atnq;e? x f. '.slid waste and dissosal? ....�.., 17. ri,mxn IOolth. Will .the proposal result in: a. Cr"tiarl of r-ny health hczcrd -or putentiol health hazard (excluding mental hcjlth)? X •b. Evasure of people to potential health hazards? ...�r.. ... - .�..,_ $. Aastf.-2tles. 'Nall the proposal result ,in tho ib trut�ion of a' scenia vie to or vile open to ft pik4iidy Or will ' 0* proposal result ire the creation of an oesthotically affensive site open ;n p�lia view? • X i Ra�rew kw% Will the prgmal result In an =t upon the gimllty or quantity of existing reertr►ol appartvnifit;# ,�,r..�,. x..��, 4. W#ll.ft prqPrarl result in the vttetesion+ Of or the +utrud$m of a prehistoric or hiatariv WdN18010 kw site? x .313 i ' t b. Will the propowl result in adversa physical - or iaMtl out is effects to tt prehistoric or historic building, structural or abject' � C, CkM the praposal have the potential to cause a pfkysical clione which would affect urrllu* ethnic cultural vulva? X d. Will the proposal restrict existing religiaue or Booted uses witftin the potential iffVext ` crew? �....�. �_._. 21. Mo-Watery Findirgs of S;9nificcsice. Q. N*s the project have the potential to degrade thr, quality Of the environment, swbstantially seduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife weaias, ccjure a fish or wild. life p"Ictlan to drop below self Pis- Wining levels, 1hreat4n to eliminate a p Icn t or an ina I commun't y, reduce the number r~ restrict the tame of a rare or etrdr ►�; • : plant or ardmc' or eliminate invort*ii exerrples of the rmjor periods x of California histr;rl cr orehistory? b. Does the project hQ-ve she potential to achieve snort-term# .o the disadvcntage of long-term, nnvirsrmm".fal goals? (A short- teem Impact on tho environment is an* which occirs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while Wq-to"m impacts X will enrira well ire to the future.) c, Ckws the project hcrom impacts which ore indivi"ly iirnitetd, bvt cumulatively con- siderable? (A project may impact an mvo or more separate resurers where the impact an, wh resources is re Wtively small, but where the effect of the fowl of those x � irrfltgts at the wwlranr' mt Is signi f Cant.)d. Does ft project have enviromwal effects which will ewse substantial adverse effects ca human boimp, p ither directly or indirectly? lid. �,1iion el rr�torrrre�tesl IEvwlwsticn !�. �rr#srprtwwa (TO be 00*kfad by the Lead Agavy) I V 4 , 4 r. • v tIS. dtsGussina 4E tn�rironieirneal Evaluation _ 1. Earth ' y • b,g. Approximately 2, 510 tvbic yards of earth will be oxcaysted • (ram veil collars , Wall footings and velve boxes. If suitable , i approximacely 370 cubic yards of that m•rtsriai wilt be used to form landscape berms , if the material i,; determined to be suitable for chat , pyrposs. It is therefore ssrtarated that a %toeal of 2 ,000 cubic Yards of excess macerisl will need to be tumnsported off the pro;ect sites . there should he no changes in the present overall height and gr6ds of the sites . The area falls within cha extension of the M quist-Frtolo special, study tone . The effectr :.'his FouLd have an the proposed project should be scudiad. 3. /dater b, f , The complisno berating of both sites could affect, drainalt S. patcerns in the surroundinj area. , as many as 36,000 barrels a day of Ulcered brine water would be injected into oil bearing formatton>s . The brim water would come f:oar one or two new water source valls to be located o;•cstda the project araa. As an alternaL:ive, the project re,iy acquire and use surplus 7roduced waxers from ache r oil operations to the Cicy. The effaces from this should be determined. b. Noise ,ft to Unmicfgsted noise Erom wall drilling operations -+ould far exceed the Cicy' s noise standards for residential areas. Eloise levels of 33 to 90 48(A) can typically result from i ecandard diesel powered aleccric drilling rig operations. The approxina to Ly 45 employees who will visit dht size durifig a 24 hour period could be exposed to severe noise += levels should they So unmicigate d. 7. Light and Clare 4 The 24 hour drilling operation will require some lifhcing z ac niahc. Ne ential Lmpacts !rare li;hc and Stage should :ae addressed. A. ,rand Use . The s:ce is currently zoned Oldtowrn Specific Plait (district two) 0 Which ptrmics stay=le and erulci- :nit etuelLings, Development of the site a: an ail recovery project would i eliminate pocential residences . 9. Naturall, Resources E a,b. The project will recover about Uve Million barrels of s unrefined crude oil that would not be recovered under current operating methods. 'Cho pcojece will be a nec energy producer, about 4.89 million barrels of oil after deducting equivalent j barrels ter anoriy cenr uar,ed in operations. .• I 40 t H W4 h 1 6 f 3` e. The potentlml rick of fire , oil 1MAka , and abandoned -jell problems Aboutd be evsluaca:. :' ly , p�putatian . 'Cho propolat will eliminate tfo blacks of patenttat ryes:,dent .A1 .1 dvatLtags raductog chi rapulacson in the a:a.s. �' l�. Housing Me project will eliminate potential residances ane cre4:e a vim 11 edbiobAr of jobs requiring a ralaclvely smaII aro,mt o! additional hauling. " 1 Transpocc&tion/Circ!i Lac to" 1 W, e dii. llpproxim ce1v 40 vehicuiac trips per day diIL be generated vµring Old drilling phase and approximately 1.0 Grips per d4y during the production phsse. it viLl ba nacess.ary to tzar up c%4 incarsection oC Springfield avenue and California, Srtsc to mako a connectLon bec`otn the two sites. The tasaparar;+ impact of chis should be analysed. +. Public Service: a#c. A aea jor •ail operaclan such as this ma-y require Lncraased !ire pro- ttccion. Czmplation of the road* , curbs and gutters surrounding Ehe per*jeee will add to mainctenance raquirtmencs. ,� �6. �t11Lri.ts f. SLgnLf icant solid asses in cha form of dri,11 Cuttings and spene d:tl,ting mud will b• =eneraced during the driLling pnaso of the project which may require special d13pasa1 - i;. Human tl sith S'b, Oil '•fait drilsf;tg and producing eperacians inveLve heavy aqutrrent , votatLle vaster: is are used by and produced by project aperxt ions . The, safaty of c laveos and near by residents should be considered 18. �esthstiCs The pocecetiat attaration of views due to the proposed dritLing and recovery equipmne an the project site from ros4wa 4 and exist tag land us*$ should be ana tyseC f . ' 1 f q N,•+ .. ^i toll w the bosis of this initial evalueflons l fin-.4 that rhv prwcs*4 project COULD INOT hove a significam: effect �-�- an the enl0rarvywnto and a NEGAri'VE DECLARATION will be prepared. i timd ,that although the orc*ased project Could gyre a s;9nificont *tfect - - on the omviromment, there 5A.411 mr be o significant effect in this cats tecws* the rnitlVolon measures descr+1ed on w atte chcd shear have yew added to the project. A NEWCATIVE ai`CLAPATION WILL SE PREPARED. I find the propos d -projoct MAY have* a significant effect on the environs. :ent� � an DIVIROI F`"JT'.�L IMPACT t J=,.PQRT sa required. cte �g tura For (Note: This is only c suggested farm. Public oge' cies ore free to de-1013e tl"*ir own format for initial stud;es.) w • ` 311 55' _ t Fys �I W , 4 EA CLOSURE ( 5) LETTER SUBMITTED BY MARY PARP.1511t TRMSURM FOR C:.L.fi.B. I, i w CONCERNED CITIZENS FOR HUNTINGTON BEACH September 13 0 1988 1 ^19 Aixuria La:)e H�inti.nu ton Beach, Q'A 926,E CITY OP Hr.."PINGTOM BEACH MiAR MIN or COt 101TY MMIOPkwlr ATTs CATMM 0'HARA Dear Ma O 'Hara: M IVAFT SUPPIEilMT 1L.7ACT RMRT 110, 86-1 AUGUST, 1988 In response to the ANGUS REIN just receive, to would iika :.tn .bring yo= attention to the fcll.owing Ct71a102MM 01'T1MS comm Mat A&I ( ) CON07S AND MPOWSB I T CONTHOL: At CONCEEINM CITIZENS request, they COUNTY JLM gt1AL17Y BaAIM comer to measure the dust at p2vj a ct alma. They reported by telephone, that the nib! factor was only 8 miles per hour on tAtat particular day. The duet blowing was aoml from the unfin'shed streets surTounding the two project site© and as we -tent into the der month of July the duet factor would got worse. A wa=i.ng was seat tci ANG1189 but rno finer cculd be made on thtt date, We were ssd, ivied to call agaLi wheat th* Mind factor, was over »T2 miles Der hour and ewtheer measurement will be made. GONGERNID CITIZENS net-rer observed any water being put on the quite high mounds of dint to control the duct. ;*ee were subjected to unhealthy lagers of dust in otw atmosphere and house between OCTDBER 1 , 19a7 and SONS 1 , 1$88 due to the Santa Ana wind conditions, which rill be soon upon us again. A6-1(4) HPAVY TRUCK SIC Accordiug to SEIRv AS.-t©t a t3 fo i, turning radius In needed for a eewmi traator,tivIler . Dolaware Street Is 60 tIll, wide with one-half oull pared. TuraixW south an Delaware off Springfield Avenue at oil, sit* will be riekq for school cW.dreea end their b-w to be een near to MY Umak twa4ing path to the entmwe at the drill sits. on Delaaart $treat. fts apposite enUvmae In on Cslllornis Street, Calif'omia Street In feet aide and only half payed on residential side. OONCEBt:DU MIZENS are having difficulties in bel.iulm ftat the pro je-3t will have onllr two tmalm (what 4"eT) per day doming to the, pro3eeot. site during drilling phase end no additional gruel: 'tmffio durLng tae pr4uc tion #how, Very truly yonz*, . 001MMED CITIZZIS POR H 8 dot John Westsimater TRMURIS went c►. li��.��st3 01 LAIUM OMW John B. Murdock � ��� O+P�/r,_F' • r r ' UMOSURE (6 ) REVIEW OF IMAM S UPP.LIMP"MAL F:. I .Ft, FOR THE AUGUS OIL RECOVERX PROJECT SiCH NO. 86040911 . PREPARED BY; CH US GROUP, INC. SEPTF,! BER 1-4 80 I { i I I i r W , WOW% . e»1jMwW jMdMr%mi_ s,R�+a,�wa�ea�sr�.,��er'..��i�owr�r.,.."WPMJVk-pft~VOWAWsq, r' � R�lTxl�ld' �1L► ��AP'"�' R'.rPp ""�'�1x. �.'i1�R.C'�" R�I��NQ'1' i 8504C91.7 ii1 i I rr*!p%red fort C/o no. mar 4 rarcish, Troapurer 1919 Almon a Lane Huntington 54&vh,. CA 92045 i Vrepored bye 2933-3 ftlism" street 1 mz* mat c t 92709 Telophano t l IIA) 161-5414 1998 a 4 - 1 714 1PIV 1' 477 MAT'!' IhPAC T This do.�cuzont was prepared cr, contract to tho Concerned Citizenn �8001 and immarizes Viamboca Group, the Dra-' t SuppleMeML �l ETIR ( Drelft 3EIL'R ) flor the propo.w-,,,,A Aiinijo Oil Rsclirery Project . Tht Draft SCIR wAS roviewe" by meabvi' j of Chambers GroapI s technical 4t" JIf tinder the direction of rr , john Westernpirr , Ch4nberx Group specJL;lixes in the prepar*'.-Ac:& ,%f r.,it\- .Alronmental documents for on- and cf9shore oil rittl goa projects . W,v have prepareet over 30 major environ- mental documents for loc,%J ai-W state agencies for oil and gas projects An the State of Wiforn-te . this review is divided into two major sections . The first section provide] vur ger.r. ) commpnts on the documnnt and the second sscticn provides our *;pecific comments on varions subject areex , we have also included a bcief cancl%ixion to out review following olar specific Cormelits . i 1' NA y Y r �Ir` .'kal1`i MEL" (`OHNSAT# Wo have identi f several i rregiAlaci ties in the Draft 321E which, in our opinion , makes t'te Draft inadequate in its present form. The.:,* aara described below: 1 . The 4oeam►*ry of fAndings fails to conform to Section 15123 of ersQA in that; the iume$r r should inrlfido all signi fi cant impects grid nitwgaation xgasur&3 as woll as ident+fica ,tion of alternatives that c►)v1d reduce t.hase impacts to .significant levxls . The sumelaery Hai., a to list all silgnificant impr-ts ident: lfi"d in the eoaein text of the document . The summery does not Ol Aruos a el.tarnat:ivftm , arwas controversy or issues to �e re: ed , 2 . 'she Draft SXXR fails to addrass the envi roe►iontal isisue n aansoc:+ateed with the construction of a grater ptpeeline frogs the Chevren facility to the proposed project site . Construction nJ6 such ao pipeline would ,have the potential to craate tf&f fic, O i r Val i ty, r1OJ,Ve and public 9af6ty i.mPacts that are not addresaead In the document. f"urthermare , the waster quae] +ty impacts are out addressed shcjuhd tho pipeline rupture during opeerat.io . 3 . The 98Is dopes not address thr, impacts associated with the conetruct;ion of a gas pipeline to the Chevron facility. As described. under so. 2 above , there could be significant. Impacts associated with construction cf the pipeline as wolf as the public saafoty Impacts a kisociate d %Lth tt potential pipeline ruptura . i 4 . The project site is rather unique in that the proposed drilling 4nd processing site is located directly adjacent to 3 R zr residoGtial units . The SEIR does not aa04rsss than Impacts in ' enough detail necessaxy to datermini the 3ctaal, impact, nor does it Identify spec :.flc oi.tigatLon measures to reduce any identified A' apucts . Of paArticulFc :Oncarn i. a the cel.ease of toxic juaterialA %ccidents and yp- 11 ;i , jis we l ' a% the miy� & iurY at, gas dine tc the rerpressuri xasAon the formation . I 5. Th* $ZIA fails to identify the criterlit that were: usaa coo the datermination of aignitic3rice► of izapa<cts ., Additionally, the effectiveness of the mitigation s►easuress and thet ,saignifican-:@ of +tho revidual impacts have not been clearly f defined. ' i 6 . Although the SUR doers Identify various projects foir cumula— tive analysis, it fails to providu an analysis of the overall cumualaatAvs impact, determination of the significance of thke. impact and formulation of mitigation measures as required in Section 15i30 of CXQA. The a narlysio fails to reflect the full range of cumulative impacts particularly for systems safety, seismicity, h+asardoui materials , noise and water quality. 7 . The 3ICIR tails to address a full range of alterritivees . In particular, it does naL add' 'sss the alternative of processing oil at a site conote from �.e proposed projeact+ area . This alterniative would, substantially reduce the systems safst� iapact aessacfated with a fire in the storage tanks. It alau does not address the No ail Storaga Alternative nor does it address alternative designs of the proposed facilitieic an the proposed si.ter , Additionally, the document does not consider an altocnative where the unprocessed oil is tra:an&ferred via sa now pipeline to the Chevron facility, eliminating the need foe; . separate processing focilitlea 3 w 1 1, 8 . Tho Stilt fails to I sntity an Snvirrm.me,ntAliy 3uperiurr Alteernmtive as requirend by eesetion la136 of that C-tQA quid6line:a . �► . The B',iJR falIS t provider o fulZ list of pr"V?Ar,e±r5 AN roquir*d by CXQA. ' t k • ' Sped r i c COAMBUTS A,, Topography. flails,, an6 Oealo%y 1 . The 8IC1R fails to addrasrk the consequences cf, the 8 .0+ *&rthquakiw on the operation of faeclli ti ss Including such effocxs as rupturing and ovectuarning of tankse rupturing of containment dikes *nd other accidents that. would have a potential for release of product. This Caaego would have the potential to affect the neighboring residences and would exarcae'bstee any public safoty Impacts easociated with damage to residential unite . go mitigation measures era provided in terms of emergency procedures , aoblla conta"nment facilities or the like to mitigate any potential Impacts associated with release of products duiri.teg a seismic., event . i a . Nydaralogy I . the SUR fails to identify the water quality impact* associated with the construction and aeration o the�i p f the p:•oposed gas pipeline and brine pipeline . 2 . The BRIM fails to identify that water quality impacts ossoei.ated with the poteantiml rupture of the crude all pipeline carrying the oil produced by the proposed project to the Chervrcin tool l i ty. while we undo tetaMnd that the use of an existing pipalinv controlled by Chevron is proposed, thc' proposed project will nevertheless create additional quantities of oil shipped in the pipetline and the release of this additional oil 4 should be Wressed . 'I • 5 • M � .I� sue,'� A .f, 5 ( Y 3 . The hydrology aen.tion doge not add>`asa the wa+tetr quality impacts to the gro�indv at-.�r dut to the release of crude oil , solvsn'�;z or other toxic zotsrieel . 4 . Ths SEia fails to identify the impact of disposal of filtrate na►ti&rlal sz3oriated with, the pCocesstng of injection water . C. Lead use 1 . The aala fails to address the impact of the proposed project on the existing CC&P' s for thv proposed project., D. Aesthetics, Light glare 1 . Thib SEIR noes not. address the flood lighting required during the drilling process . 1 . The SE11 oaly centarins one rende"ring of the pcopoxed project . Xt does not shorn scale nor does it havo a description of porspect:ive . Several scaled renderings from sevaral viewpoints would be necessary to assess the visual Impact. �. • �i.r Quality 1. The SUR does not describe the aAC quality Impacts associated with construction of the gas and crater pipelines. 3 * The BAIR also does not address the dent-rraleted impacts noted by ace& homeowners during the initial construction 4 , j M phase . Additional mrtasures fnr duxt control such as use of dust comtroA cha:mwcals should bar discussed . I . Alt:hop)gh th$ SEIR doe: ianalyre ertiss.i.ons asaocalated with normal facility operation , it tails to Calculate emissions er isociated vith rail spills in the facility, l9+eGatrad ", a Zaci l i ty 15 in closet prux i ml ty to reai,denti.al. uni ts , trhe Pst ssionx , i nCludi.rig publIQ exposure to ban% no , should he calculated fcr an episode **hare oil As spilled ani contained in the containment nr*a and then cleaned up by vacuum truck . j d . The SKIR fails to mention t;h* expected Concentration of a 2 8 within the go$ •xtVact od from the w*It . Since sour gas occurs within the the Huntington Beach Fields t the R'At quality , analysis should include moialing of the exposure of IR28 to area residents S.n the event, of release of toxic gas. �. �o�.sa► 1 . The SUR, an well ax the prewiuua CrR. did not quantify the magnitude of ilmpa;.-t of the noise, associated with the dcilliiiq opewat:ion, The extent of mitigation afforded by the control measures have not been been quantified- in order to determine ,-hother impacts have been r:xduced to insignIficance . 0 . Risk of Upset/atVOSS R eal th and Satety The const►uetion of a ma jot oil and gas facility In close proxicsity to rasidential areas present* spec!al systess safety problems . The analysis in the Stta generally takes the approach that if an event is unlikely to occur, there is 7 '�fMQif@ '''wVAr' „",d no impact . The general v,tate-oi-the-art analyTia for cif and gas pro jtrcts pro jtctw beat the project impacts an covise= guenres of an acci.%iant , not upon the probability of occurrence ,. It 16 likvly that even an ement of low probabLl- ity of oc cu.:'rence could occur during the life of the project. The analysis of this section is fully inadaquate, lacking quantitotive aaaiyeis assuming ti�oa►aonable worst-case analysis Nnd fails t.c � ow�;r�g dekhtled mitAgati on measures to w1t.19&tO or reduco she conaequences of an upset or accident . Addi,t3.onally, a preliminary risk management plan and swill contingency plan should be provided during review of than BEER In a rder to fully evaluate the effectiveness of the programs gvopostxd for mitigation . iDs ' icieo-nciaes noted in this section include ; 1. The BEER states that thero will not be any impart caused by leakages of gars due to ropressuri$ati nn of the formation. This conclusion is baited on att ai.aa indicating few current probleas with existing walla . The � proposed waterflood project would initially , substantially increase ptessura within the formation and may cause gas leaks at wells that currently do not leak. Additional studies are required to determine the extent of this impact and realistic aitigaAtion measures such as resealing of wells,. use of etas detectors In homes and the use of evacuation plans oust be provided. 2 . The 8312 should discuss the impact of fire aced/o& explosion at the drill rigs in addition to those impacts associated with oil ,storage. 2. Tho 3821k should discuss the potential for release of gas confalning a 2 8 from both the facility and from the pipeline. Hasard footprints should be calculated based � f • 59. I , on the cs:rssyw'=ss nLration of n2s as wall oz the volumo in the plp►tline or well head. 4 . The SKIR should diaicus s tho potential for firo and explosion Trion natural gjs3 et the well head or in the proposed pipeline . S . The SEIR should d#.scu,%x the i,mcre.levntO impkt t of pail spills or fires in 'tho Chevron crude sail pipal i i „ Quant iti4o of each has.a rdous chomicasrl pro3 jected for use should bye osstlmated. AA asststlyalss should he meet of the impact of spills of the quantities of each chemical as well as coubination of chemicals an the xurroundi,ng art& e X. Traffic 1. . The MR does not &Ares s tho traffic impacts mosssaociated with the construction of the gas and water pipelines . 9 r .wr r T Wp 1 CONCLUSION Our review of the tEI.t has pointed out several major deticirtucies In tha document including the axission of analysis of two major pipelines directly assacislre d wtt h, the project so wall as not providing a comprohensiva analysis of the cumulative impacts of the proposed pro jvct. Addition-illy, the systea s safety aspoeti of the proposed project aextd n- varal tether issues have not been adequately addressord , Swbxtantial ravision of the current Draft BCYR is therefore required Since the revised document will usadoubtedly Ideent.1:fy additional significant impacts , we belieevo that the roM awd docuount should be reci rculaLred as a Draft SM to allow further reviarw by both, Responsible Agencies and the Public before consirinration by the d►er.ioian makers of the City . , i R r �r i 1 ' 4 huntingfcn'� b6arlh d, part4rment of COMMUGHY d0velopmei-d STAf f E P 0 R ••...ter+. TO planning Commission DATZ : October U , IM COMJUNCTIOR WITH SUPPLEMMA1. E,H'VIRQMPTNTAL 114P 4CT REPORT NO . 8 8-•1) AFZLICM44 Angus Petroleum Corp. 5772 Dols& Ave . , Ste. 210 AI �.yust 23 , 1988 Huntington Bch . , CA 92649 Mli !PA tQ, =9 1 NG DATE r AM: Oldtown Specific Plan- August 23 , 1989 District 2• 0 GENfCRAL Medium Density ,: Vacant with PI : Residential oil production " 3 . 1, acres (both blocks combined) Rozone Block A (Ti act 12747; from "Oldtown Sp%scific Plan-Di,i6trict Two-OA1 Facilities (0T-2• 0% " to 0O1dt:ow4 Specific Plan--District Two- Oil � Facilities with Oil Drill.ing (OT-2-01) " to allow the drilling of now oil wells . Una Pgrrt " : To develop an oil consolidation dril.lsite j on block A and, associated soil facility on Block S. Also requested is a reduction of exterior sidayard wetbacks from tern (10) feet to a minimum seven ( 7) feet for the north and south elevations of both Blocks . A1,1911: The project site consists of two blocks located on opposite corners as foliowx : Black A (Tra t-,.127171; bounded by Springfield Avenue , Delaware Street, Rochester Avenue and California Street:; and Clack B (7, get 1274fi' : bounded by Toronto hvenu4e, California Street , Springfield Avenue and Huntington btr�t. WON 4 i (a) ,approve and reconmiand that; thti �::i. t. � � ��utr�: ; ;• ,��t~• Zone No . 8l - 1.1; And (lot Approve Use Fermin 88.445 based on, findings and canditions of approval . Zone Change No . 88- 1 ! to a req:iest to rezone Block A (Tract 12747) and add the -01" sutt ix to ioi..i.uw Wins oL .111..ihy ut aaew o i l wells. A present , both Mocks A and 8 are currently zoned to allow exi5ti.ng oil operations . Block A reguiress the "01" suffix to permit new coil wells . Use permit No. 88-25 is a r.equeat: to establiah a consolidated drill :site and oil operation of both blocks . �S�__3�Li13�S� .�.� �.?�.�.� ..T,�����i^_..�►, ._Sa�����A1�..PL?1_�,_+_-I:� �.l.�r�= Mg1t1a East , Sant �d �egt .off_. L t_. 'San®rtv: GENERAL FLAN DESIGNATION : Medium t',)ents i ty Res i dent-:i a l ZONE : Oldtown Specific Plan � IUD USE: Residential. 4.9 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : t0luppletaental Environmental Impact Report No . 88-1 wag prepared as a supplement to the Oreviously prepared Environmental Impact Report No . 86-1 which were prepared to assess the envirorane-atal impacts relative to Zone Change No . 88-11 and Use Permit No . 88-25 . Supplemental Enviaronmvntal Impact Report Hn . 88-•1. and Enviro.unental. Impact Report No . 86-1 represent a 0-. tailed analysis of the project , project-related impacts, alternatives and meessurza intended to adverse environmental impacts . Friar to any action on Zone Change Me . 98-11 and Use permit no . 88-25, it in necessary that the Planning Commission review end act on Supplemental Environmental. Impact Report No. 88-1 and Environmental Impact Report no . 86-1 . All Suggented mitigation measures recow*esnded in Supplementail. Vnvirowwntal Impact Report No. 88-1 and Environmental Impact Report No. 86-1 have been incorporated into conditions of approval . 1. 9__.--5 >STAL STATUS: Not applicable , &A__._ FVMJJ.T STATU; Not applicable. Thx prejoet Is xocated within the boundsrion of the Oldtewn Specific p14re-01satriOt 2 which is sa Mdium density residential district . Toth Bieck A and a currently have tho *0" suffix which pzrsmits existing oil Wells, all sfacilition and oil storage operations. This 0 t ILON with the reuir snta of tho dldtown Specific Plan-� opt tot tAs • t*Cior snide Yard Setbacks. The 1949t 14 iSOU 8tisnV s teduatidn of oxtesrior sideyarft from ten �,,, t th t minims of $*Vern (7) t"t. I 't"tia< prop-3aed water-flood oil, recover� pro j act i.s %n attempt to coaso:lidste ise')lated 0.il leases into a single project area . Accoardin�- to ::he, applicant , coil recovery mill be approximately ►pine million hartels from k_-he Spr ; j4(3r`! e'td Oil Fif-ild by directional drilling and a s.:+:�i�t�utisiat Fytt Y.f,.;.C'IyE'► .Y sys� ta�tt� . J.1111tipitly and !.f)nX facilities are tv tic:• oc: P10f.:1K 9 1.2746 ) , All oil will be transported by p1 pal tree and nit, *,try surfaces ve;iicles . R'Loc�1: A (Tract 12747) will contain a Enc��,l.it�41t1 :: f 4t9 v,�r•� , ] s wl lIch includes bot,', i , jE� tars and producers . Development: of thEy project will be in two phase s . k't1ul4e One will be: the construction of off,-.cite and on-site improveinents and facilities . Prior to the drilling of any new well , the appl.ir; .nt will construct.: street irnpro-aemenfs , sidewalks , the perimeter walla , landscaping , tank facilities and pipeline: c !'.Yinect: ions . Phaso Two will be the drilling of a maximum 45 new wells , Drilling will be continuous for anproximate ly 24 months uti l i sing oni drilling rig operating 24 hours a day . The applicant estimates that the drilling of the new wells can be better accomplished by using one rig over a time $pan of 24 months . The project will he screened on each side of both blocks by an eight (8) foot high masonry wall and landscape buffer which will enhance the project and screen the op3 atior.s from the st.irrounding neighborhood. The masonry walls will be softened by multiple planter areas in addition to intensified tree plantings . During the 24 month drilling phase , a 30 foot high acoustical blanket will be installed around the perimeter ireei.de the black walls and a Round blanket will be installed around the drilling rig which will mitigate noitsc as sugge rt;ed by Supplemental Elk b$-•l and required by the Ci.ty's ardl nonce Codes. After the site development and drilling phases , the operation will be somewhat passive . Periodic maintanance ti.gn will be required to ;Ase acoustics i blankets on poorer source and will be limited to daytime hours . The entire operation will be monitared on an ongoing basis ior compliance with Title b (tioi.ae) and Title 15 (ail fade) of the Huntington beach Municipal, Code and the conditions horein . Prior to drilling each new well., a seiperet:e dr. illizig permit must be obtained From the City with approval f=em the Fire Chief . This will enable the Witty to strl.ctly iftonit;or the success of the mitigation measures and protect the surrounding existing nei9hbo7L'hood from Ciaturbances The applicant has requested a reduction of the exterior side yard setback from ten (10) feet to seven ( 7) feetu Section 9130 . 7(b) of the iiunti.ngton Inach Ordinance Code allows for s reduction of exterior side rani setbaeka based on four (4) findings based on A0improoted designs compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood, and enhanced architectural variation. s; '11taff Uport 10/18/48 3- ► The perimev ,3r wall thaL is proposetJ t-(,) su , ,A :,in0 blucks does comply with the findings for a reduclron of the ten 10 f not setback . r;.- iatioi-, irl %et-.k,),ack r3rjq,-.?.s frorr, se ,en ( 7 ) 'giloolk., to twerity-five ( ,. 5) feet . The matefial iii 'll be Which providos arcIA! t -I,cLura.1 .,,ariiftlon . ri'jv perimeter fi°ncj.nq combined i t.h t h t, too J h,,.-A pe ina t,e i -i o ! s hc- det riinenta . to property V a i LA ki 6 , ttlle 9PWIPI,3I health ;jt- Wr_71_1.t. 01 pet)L)Ie Ltl,'iJd I ?, in the existing Burro-ending nai -)hb(.N r hood , Stait ze:ommendm that Lhi� Vlannjilj (a) Approve and reconnend that the City ..-.ouncil adopt Zone Change 14c) . 8E.-I.1 ; eud M Approve I-Ise Pe,.rrit: Wo , 85-25 based on, findings and conditions of approval , BA=11 1 . A change of zone trom 'wOldl.uwn Specific F) air , District (Oil Operations er.cl-Airtg oil Drilling ) L.-, "Oldtown Specific Plan, Dif-trict. '.rwo.-.01" (Oil OperationE including oil Drilling) will be compatible with suirounding residential uses based on the mitigation measures deocribed in the onvironmental impact report and conditions of approval outlined in the use permit . 2 . The proposed zone change is consistent with the goals and policies of the General. Pla.,.a . Unitization any .-ionsolidation I of existing ojpe � ations is encourayvl because .it, reduces the land area used for oil facilities . Approximately 5. 3 acres of dev-Rlopable '"and will become available after, the con6olidation on the two., blocks ( 3 . 1 acrea ) a . Section 9682 of Article 958 of tha City Zonina Code provides for tb,� establishment of "01r Districts , The only limitation for such an Oil. District is that of a minimum surface area ( 100 feet by 150 feet ) , as required by Section 9602 . 1 . The propoaad drill site for the project is considerably larger than the minimum dimensions required by Section 9602 . 1 . ThereS-ore , it is consistent with this provision. h. Section 9682 . 2 zequires dedication, or an irrevocable of*ear of dedicatim, of all, real propex,ty that the City may require for its streets and other public service facilities or improvements . All City-required dedicattcnr. will be implemented through the terme of recorded tract mope for the, project site . Therefore, the project in consistent with this provision. AL'aff Itepart 10/18/88 -4-- (14534) c . The project trill rem0,ye ai, l producing facilitiots from six I' antes , thereby permitting the restoration of oil sites acAttered over 16U acroo . Alth.)ugh oil produ;'ing f ac i l i t- ios will remain can the project situ, the appearance of the project site will be improve over its prasent: Condition , Therefore , the project is consistent with this policy . a. . With respect to the Land Use element , policies have been translated into a Zoning and Land Use Element Crrsistancy Matxix . " ire matrix shows that as a miacelisnr district -01 they be combined ( i .e. is consistent) wit' any land use category . It is specifically consistent w- r_ iow, medium and medium--high density residential cste- J.e:s . 3 . Compliance with Title 8 and Title 15 of the, Huntington Beach Municipal Code and the use permit conditions of approvai will ensure that the proposed use al. ' iwed by the rorsei change will net be dot~rimental to the gPr.�ral t►,)alt:h, welfare, and safety or the corunur,ity . 1 . The establishmeat , maintenance and operation of the oil operat.-lon will. not be a:e=,r. i.ment:al to the general welfare of person:.: ;(=•sidinc; or workirAr in the vicinity, property and iniprovelnel is in the vicinity of such use or bu ' fling based on the c,)nditionn of approval and compliance with `title 8 and Title 1.5 of the Huntington �eac h Municipal Cofle . i 2 . The propo,ued oil orpration is � -onsistent with the goals and 01.-,jecti.ves of the general plan . Oil activities are: a consistont use in any land use catago ry of the General plan . 1 . The ,project will consul date oil operations in one location reducing the visual 4.mpact of numerous we113 now spread throughout the Springfield Oil Field area . Such consolidation will also be advantageous for safety and noise reduction purposes , The project will result in t-ne abandonment and rec:lamb-t;ion of, a1 existing wel,La and 1.6 ail storage tanks in the Springfield ail Field area and will not significantly increase traffic in that area . ' 4 . Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No . 88-1 and Ent,,i rorrwn t a 1 impact Report No . a5-1 have determined that any remaining significant of foac+ts can the environment found to be unavoidable ire acceptable due to ovei: riding cons;detations . 5. conditions of approva ! fax Use Ne,rm•i t go . 88-18 have etli.mir• ated or substancial,ly lesse:nal all significant effects on the environmPt where fensitele. Ike 6 . The project will resu 1 t it increased tak revenues for the City of Huntington Leach and other gover:,mental agencies . 611, Staff deport 10/18/88 (1453d) 1. w r,• 0 7. The conditions of approval are desirable and nwcessary in order to effectuate tits purposes of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code, the official General plan Land Use plan and the best interests of the City. Further , they include mitigation measures set forth in they final Xnvi rormei.ta l Impact Report that *ill assure the location Aa suitable for the type of use proposed and the following will not result or be reasonably anticipated from the project : a. Damage or nuisance: from noise, smoke , odor, rust or vibration; hazards from explosion, contamination or fire. b. Hazards occasioned by unusual volumes o. character of °r traffic; incompatibility with surrounding development . c . Tne project complies with all requirements of Division g except for the identified reduction of Exterior sideyard setback and other applicable provisions of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code . 8. The conditions imposed include requirements of plans for the j disposition of oil wells and for oil operations on the proper�.y involved, and for berms, walls and landscaping to provide maximum feasible Esc%:aening of equipment and facilities . g . Changes have been required and incorporated in the, project to mitigate or avoid the significant adverse environmental effects cf the project : a . The Division of (ail and Gas enforces rules and regulations for the o%onduct of secondary re::uvery operations . b . The, mitiggation measures incorporated , proposed and adopted, together with application of he rules and regulations of the Division of oft ana Gas, will effectively mitigate all of the adverse impacts identified . c . public agencies other than the City, including the Division of Oil and Gas, Regional Water quality Control Boar! and South Coast Air Quality Management District, will be rev ewing aspects of this project for mitigation measures as to matters within their responsibility and Juri.adicti.on, including subsurface operation, wa% it and air qu+si "ty; the c:itical need for oil readers infeasible r� the alternatives of no project or delayed project implemntation, and alternative surface locations are infeasible becsuni of their limited availability, or the grea'�er dieruptiin to the community at large which would result therefrom1b sX: , N^F y 10 . The subject location in centrally located within the Springfield Oil Field area; relocating the proposed project to another site is infeasible. 11. . Sty substantial public purposes would be served by doui.al Cat Usd Permit No. 89 -25 but rather : a . It is important that the United States develop its cziating oil reserves in order to meet its energy needs without increasing dependenco on formign oil , and this project will result in incremental recovery of � approximrtely nine (9) million barrels of oil, ; and i b. The project will consolidate oil operations in one location, reducing the visual impact of numArous wells now spread throughout the Oldtown portion of the City; and c . 8ach consolidation will also be advantag,3oub for nefety pr-1 noise reduction purpo:ies ; and d . Th,s project will be only do isiterim use of the surface slt,i involved ,, and at the termination of the project the skA. will b4; available for r.ecycl.in(( irato ether vzus; and e . The prof act wi13 benefit and Accrue to the general. welfare 1 of the tatty and the public far each of the reasons set forth above . f . Approval of thin project will reduce the immediate damand for m-,re off-shore drilling facilities . 12 . The proposed oil. conaolidat: on project will have ZA !sour on-nite personnel , and will be eafex than the ea.ists.nq ne aW continuous monitoring of the 31 scatterivA %vel.s to be abandoned throughout the area . This will reduce the possible attraction of younger parsons . IS . The most modern, of fig lent: enemy-°saving tegulpment available will be integrated i:ltc the design of the pto jeect whicsA will mitigate anvironrmnt-al. Impacts such as fire, noise :end air pollutants , 14 . The applicant ha-j submitted a propimrty value protection plan which will be impler;3nteed as outlined prior to drilling. 15 . The reduation of the wsterior fi!de�,,srd setbacks from ton ( 10) ko semen (7) feet i a based an the following : a. Tke reduction of exterior si,deyard xetback for peeimete►r aril frrom teen (10) to serv+en (7) feet will result in i0prov d design and utl l).ty of the project . b. The design of the peariraetesr wall will be compactible with the surrounding neighborhood . r r ., 0-toff Report - 10/18/d8 -7— (1a53df p n , . tla L, n r 0% This proporad perimeter wail with reduced erterio,r sideyard setbacks will not have a detrimental effect on the general health, safeatlt, welfare or setback privacy of surrounding ' residents. d. Variation in the wall Petback- ix provided through the use of offset landscape poc:hdts, arrhitectural fustureas and building materials . Q111 SS QF AFFIIQYAL A nM=. W.4_..,� 1. The site plan, elevations and landsceps plan dated received October 13. 1988, Shall bF the conceptually approved layout . a . Thin use permit shall not become of fe ctia•.-.i until Lone Change No. 88- 11 bar been approved and in effect . 2 . 41.1 structures and pi=edures shall conform Lo Title 15 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code and the Division of Oil and Gas Standards . 3 . The applicant shall obtain all necessary elec:tricol and building x•ermlts . i 4 . poise monitoring shall ,be conducted under the supervision of j an acoustical enginesr cei-tif. ied by the County of Orange. Reports shall ae submitted to the Director of Community Development within three working days after the coinpieti.on of each phase df Ue monitoring effect . The monitoring shall include the following : a . ,�,•m- Phone mgnit2rA . Prior to the -I-art of the drilling phase , noise measurements shell be obtained during the operation of the specific drilling ring which has been sel.ezted and the measurements shell be related to those which will. be eaper:enced of the nearest residential boundaries to the drilling site. in addition, the noise Control measures have been (car will be) applied to the rig an needed for compliance with the City of Huntington Beach Boise Ordinances shall be identified. b. fitAXt o Drjj'd Noise measurements shall be obtained duriijg the aighttime hours (10:00 PH to 7 :00 AM) Oor at least six honre on each of three nights within the five 4 , day period from the start of the drilling phase. ftnitOriOQ in to occur at the nearest residential boundary to the actual drilling operation. The noise level delta shall be compawed to those specified In the City of Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance by the b+sP*rtmwan� of Community Development . Where an esceedance Of the ardinance is identified, noise control measured Shall be applied and an additional two nights o ` � munitering shall be required . staff Report - 10/1.8/88 (14530) L, Y ' f r �LYr yM 1 . oul Jag ,tile as.wing-12 im. noise monitoring shall occur during a six-hour petiod between the hourm from 10:00 PM to 7 : 00 AN at least once each month during the drilling phase of the project . The noise levLL date obtained shall be oompareJ to the City of Huntington Batch poise Ordinance standards by the Department of Community Development . Where an exceedance of the standards is 3dentifiel, noise control mesasureaa shall be applied and art additional two nights of monitorin0 shall be required . 3. Measuren to reduce erosion should be used during grading and site preparstion , Grading and censtruction activity shall take place only during daylight hours after the issuance of a grading permit by they Department of Public Works . 6 . During grading and excavation, earthmoving crews should observe cuts and spoils for potential archaeological finds . In the event of a potential find being located, operations shall be suspended until the significance of the find is determined . 7 . A dust control program Rhall be subrr-i.tted to the Department of Community Development for preview and approval prior to the issuance of bui7.Mig permits . S . All atreet improvements for both tracts shall be constructed after the beau-aiidirm operations have been completed (approximately 4 eeks) : a . Final grading , or any of er on--site construction shall to prohibited until street: improvement construction has commenced . L, Prior to any ore--site construction or drilling, the masonry wall and all landscaping and street improvements shall be installed subject to the approval of Department of Community Development and Department of Public Works, g . prior to the installation of any landscaping, a landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to the Department: of Community Development and Public Works for review and approval . a . All landson 9:ach ng shall comply with Chapter 15 .22 of the suotingt:a Ordinance Code and all tracts shell be , 4101r= 24 Inch box type and spaced no greater than 10 feet on center . 10. Prior to the iastallatLoa of the offi+:e structure, elevations $boll bar proridod for review and =pp:corral by the Department of cowamitr 0eve lop "At . as This office shalt be on a permanent foundation. b. A mansard or itched roof shall be provided . P r staff Itepost - 10/12/68 �0_ (14536) A r r i 11. The applicant shall enter into a franchise agreement with the City for the installation of the underground connection ' between the two blocks, if required. r;. 12 . The proper sealing and abandc nment of the existing scattered wells which will be replaced by this project shall. take place following approval of this project and mint be completed +sithin eighteen (20) months . 13 . The su=tace of the site shal% to completely covered with an appropriate material (such arc gravel and/or asphalt) subject to review and ipproval of public Works Department , Fire Department and Department of Community Development . t, ' 14 . A report prepared by an acoustical engineer certified by the County of Orange shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development for review and approval prior to commencing drilling . Said report shall describe noise levels at the Angus Oil Site property line and at the nearest residential property line bath with -and without an acoustical blanket on the drilling rig and service ri."s . The report shall indicate noise attenuation measures necessary to ensure compliance with the Huntington Beach Poise Code . This shall include the provisions of the (Ordinance Code regarding maximum hourly average noise level at nearest residential property line of 50 de(A) daring nighttime hours between 10 :00 PM and 7 : 00 AN. 1 a . A double acoustical b1tinket enclosure shall be provided at man-door entrances . 15 . Noise attenuation for the Srilling operation, oil operation and service operation shall be. provided pursuant to they Oil Code and noise report speicified in Condition 14 . a . If a noise violation occurs , the entire drilling structure shall be wrapped with an acoustical blanket for greater r noise attenuation. 16 . The project shall fully comply with the Huntington Herach Noise Ordin4acee. At the applicant ' s expense, a continuous calibrated motor shall be on site to monitor the decibel ODA) level with a printed copy to be made available( to City staff f and Ad Ascon Pro j oct Review Committee on a weekly basis. ix 17. No speakers, loud bells or buzzeru shall be employea on sites, is. ftauoive violation., as determiners by the Department of Caftamitr Development, shall be reduced to acceptable levels . lot Fight and glare shall be directed and/or screened to prevent 0891119ge s auto adjacent residential proportion and shall be energy efficient subject to the requirements of the Building Division. i1 1y k • iJ 206 All heavy truck traffic shall be limited to the following strsats between the 405 freeway and the subject site : Beach Soulovard, Adams Avenge, and Delaware Street . For entranct to ` the Si':o only Springfield Avenue and Caliatornia Street may be 4- usso. 31 . Heavy truck traffic shall be limited to the hours between 7 % 00 AN and 5 : 00 M. G a . So trucks may park on the street . b. Truck deliveries shall be staggered so that no stackInq shalt occur on public streets . 22 . All employees must park on either one of the two sites . dtreet parking for empIG,-toes is prohibited . 23 . Local streets affected by truck traffic shall be inspected before and after construction. Any demage to local streets by heavy trucks shall be repaired and reconstructed per City requirements of the expense of the applicant . a# . All driveways shall be radius type and constructed to Public works standards. 25 � The:e shall be no entrance or exit of vehicles from the drilling si.tc between the hours of 10 : 00 FM and 7 : 00 AM except for esv*rgency, purposes . 26. An overload permit should be obtained from City and State (if required) for all oversized loads t�,:) be moved on public o t rest s . 27. Pipe string cementing through fresh water . caring sands shell be implemented to prevent salt water intrusion into the +aquifers . 26 . A system for collectlnq , treating, End releasing storm drrairsaye shall be provided by .he -applicant and approved by Public Works . 29. Brine grater shell not be released into the sewer system. 30 . A reogvIing plan of produced zone water back to the oil rwsa rvelt aha11 be ce-rtifled by the Department of Oil and Gas died th 'p- .0 0mpaartmesst and all its conditions and restrictions shall be adhered to. 31 . 4611 service trigs shall be operated too more than a total of 48 days pelt year between 7:00 AN and 7:00 PH or daylight bcuro, whiebovor is short*, Staff Report 10/10/68 (14136) l 4,, , i , . 1 M, 1 9r - �f'r° +F 32. No moire then four well service rips may be on the promises at N arty one time. The servioe rigs shall not exceed 120 Eset in height and shall bo doable muffled and utilize acoustical ' b►lashet■ as deeMa necessary. 38. All drilling ri vx and production wells shall be operated by electrical motors +and electric pumps only. h'. 34 . The 24-hour phase drilling rigs shall not operate for any longer than 1 yeara from the issuance of the first drilling `a pie rmi t. r 35. Drilling rigs for remaining wells after the two year period shall compiy with the conditions. Subsequent drilling shall be limited to 7 :00 AN to 10 M PM only. �M 36 . Drilling derricks shall not exceed 165 feet in overall height . 37. Upon completion of 24 hou -. ?hase of injection and Vxoducer wells, all dril.liny rigs. ..all be removed from the site . 36 . Service rigs shall be erected only during maintenance operations . 39 . Applicant shell install blowout prevention equipment . 40 . A full vapor recovery jystem shall be installed as required by the South Coast Air Quality Management District . 41 . Only three on-site crude oil :ranks are permitted and shall � never be completely full at once . 32 , Prepare and submit a Preliminary Emergency .action Plan ( ►P) prior to frsuance of building permits . A completed Emergency Action Plan base' on as-built plans shall be completed and submitted prior to the ^tart of oil production opevatione . The emergency Action Plan shall include ardployes training and periodic practice, how anilloge onto stroet, from site(s) would be handled (stockpile of sand, etc. ) , the We handling of any chemicals and/or materialap and full knowledge of all systems and emergency equipment. A copy shall be on 'file with the mire Depart.meat and updated on a fire year basis . in ref 44141t3ons a Spill 2revention and Control. and Countv.rmeasure (OCC) Plan in compliance with City requ►i,r...,vents for handling ' Of spills, ate , , not otherwise covered in the amirgonoy Action Plan shall be completed and filed with the City prior to the start of oil production operations 43. All ail gist be transported by pipeline. "staff Report - 10/18/88 -13- (1453d) .JJ rr , 4 I a• 44 . An one-xi.te fire suppression system shall be installed an a . YXIMAry Source for fire protection pursuant to Fire Department � r reeguirer��ents . 46 , Callan reequirtments for oil wells ; r- r . A hydro;en sulfide detection system for the well cellers shall be installed subject to Fire Department requirements . k b. Fire extinguishers approved by the F-2re Department must be inftolled within 75 feet of travel on-site. c. provide metal opett grate covers over top of yell cellars . 46 . 60;orage tank requirements ; a. Must have pre-plumbed foam injection syrt:em ii,stalled on all product atcrage tanks. b. Must have exterior deluge water spray system or all storage tanks . 47 . i ::e requirements a . All diked areas must have an engineered drainage system. b. Foam storage area and foam quantity to be approvod by Fire Department . c. rise hydrants to be located in areas approved by Fire Department, d . Hydrogen sulfide detection system approved by ?ire Department to be installed on project perimte r. e. Vire extinguishers approved by the Fire Department must be Installed throughout the site. E . All Bete openings must b& 24 feet in width and inatOlUt#ba Must comply with Fire Department Spftiftb*tiOO 403 W 0611*rs Sholt bo maintained in o' cleea.n and efficient aboAdanOkd wells have b000ri identi.fi, vithin ;, ► t' 'g� Ch 4o net meat resent day1 ab onftnt Ismter. c�►ntt emy , PO all be eutll.ned and A A subdtted to the NuAtirioto,a Beach Firs teri4rttrent for review 806 nIrprdrral With steps to be taken in the event that leakage `t L fray any of theso abandoned mails finds ite wsy to rhea surface. , tr - U43 ;y e+h, w; r lid. prior to termination of the oil operation, a plan shall be submitted subject to review and approv e l of the Fire Department and Commoni,ty De�,elopment Department, showing how the site shall be abandoned and restored to its closest natural state . 51 . There shall to no pipeline conxtructi.on activity outside the siteexcept between the hours of 7 : 00 AM and S +Oa pM, Monday through Saturday only. 52 . The methodoioglr of oil recovery for this project shall b6 11afted to water injection only. steam injection shall be prohibited . 33 . The operator shall at all times during the term of this use permit and any renewal oa cztension the teof, maintain in force an insurance policy of policies insuring the operator , and a additional itrsureds the City of Huntington Beach, the City Council and each member thereof , and every officer and employee of the City acting in the due course of his employment or in his official capacity, against liability o: financial loss resulting from any suits , claims ir actions brought by any person or per - sort , and from ell casts and ,Rxpenses of litigation brought against the insuieda , in the amount of not less than $5, 000 , 000 combined singly limit for any injury to persons or damage to property, including (but not li-mited to) injury or damage from al.lbsidence and rebound , resulting from the opera"orr ' s oil drilling and production activities and operationts incidental thereto . Said policies shall provide that the insurancecoverage shall not be cancelled or reduced by the i.rsurance carrier without the City having beer given at least ten days prior written notice thereof by such carrier. The operator mhull not cancel or reduce acid insurance coverage . At all Limes during the germ of thin use permit , and any renewal or extension thereof, the operator shall maintain on file with the City Clerk a certificate or certificates of insurance issued by the carrier or carriers showing that said insurance is in effect in the amount required above„ and a copy of each insurance policy. if the operator does not keep said insurance In full force and effect, the City may obtain said insurance and pay the premium thereon, which aha l l then the deemW a debt *named by the + xdt6r to the City. AnT insurance polieles prow ed b� the operator hereunder Shall provide that the insurance ccrr et of Ives all r0hts of subrogation against the City. if the C�t vb in$ any policy of insurance hereunder, such policy include a r#aiver by the insurance carrier of all righte iUbrogatirse against the operator. h' -14- 14SW A,� i 1r�15ihlQh!lNMY7� H?�#� NQMJl�1�IIIfMi nom i � -t• R!r-C��1e • D- R [ It —Z�— ��• o- + IIf Ilt ilt IJi L •, F�1 R It olls OV -� ;�. � �f�+ I ro i�s I OJ !f^D��O- —v 0 l�f 9 d�Fd li:! I l+ Z •� �s �;-- f ( r f I I �' 8 0 i j f 1+-- ; '`� � � � f �O o-�•'r- � ( � !� +ice f Z� Z� � l f—---•-, � � � 1 R alO.GSIL i � � I I Sea!!: I j• � ��� '� _ F i _-- r f , ':.'..� �r 54 . the Planning Commission shall review and , if necessary, may modify the condiLaons as not forth in this use permit , at the first regular Planning Commission meeting in October , 1989, eed at five year intervals thereafter , and upon any change in l oernershlp of the project whf ch occurs between five-year roans ; provided that the phrase "change of ownership" as used herein shall not include any sale or other transfer to a corporation, partnership or other form of business organisation in which Alberta Natural Gas-United States and/or one or more of its shareholders or subsidiaries owns the controlling interests , oi, any sales or transfer so long as Angus or one if its subsidiaries retains responsibility for the operation of the project . 55 . The planning Commission reserves the right to revoke this use permit if any violation of these conditions or. the Huntington Reach Ordinance Code occ�.irs . The City shall provide the property owner with .uotica in writing of any violation, stating the City ' n basin for determining that a violation has occurred . They property owner shall ha�re a reasonable ti.rs6 to cure the violat ioN before further action i s taken. They City may require the property owner with notice in wrihing to submit written documentation of actions taken to remedy at.y violation and may requires monit9ri ng or other procedures to be implemented in order to ensure that the violation will, be cured . 56 . The nine member project review committee shell monitor the project during the dlriliiag phase and semi -annually thereafter . The Fire Department and Community Development: departments bhall jointly provide a staff liaison . 57 . The property value protection plan submitted by the ,applicant: shall be implemented as out:li.r,eC prior to drilling . 58 . In the event that either one of the two blocks is to be without 24--hour supervision, a video camera shall be employed ern-aitee to provide continuous surveillance which can be monitored by personnel at the other site . A= SM 44 Ares map 2 . Site p14n, elevationa and landsc� peg plan 3 . Previout finding& and conditions of approval for Anguo Project 4 . Draft Ordinance S . Comparison of Current and prior Springfield Project 5. Let tors; in Support of project h.; 7. Letters in oppesitior of project !tof f itepart - 10!1" ( 1453d) .'"n l f 1 n 1 NOI ivuoquap WnA-iq l.1 :-ir! snO1VV�N._.�. _ __...._..�E n c.aLiz IIM/I v1�wY!•1 ti'o C) 0 00 .i5�n ��•, +ram .r 'i`� - '-- - — +�.—.ar-w.—�.,..r.�.,a__,_ ..�.� s+...�...�.�-�a..._� _�.. �K I� y - r�.��l.w'w. ^�--•��^•_,__�___ � �� ���..� ��.'�a� ��.'�i• � �N� 'n�^�� r�,,yi,iR ' J ��'�'T A1I� ,�� Sa 4 �rt CAL- :1''ORN 1 w 3/•RdrT 1 J � 1 J + + r� `, i I , I 'a'. i ��� i 1.—.!•� ��I -� +� I � 1 r � .. i r;r■P ,N(:r Ixi.r rrZrl_If'r'-^ .. .�� • .. ..... , . ,..._ . .r r r , _ ' 4 • i�;:i s 1i �1 h 1 I' 4 I Mr 01 . +: �'4 Z 4 ; .M-...rr_....---...Yin..-,-�.r.++•.-w..,....�..+.+..._..�.rr....�.....�......�...._.r.........•_�...r...•��...r....�y...�-...,_ CA I.i f OWN I A E3TREE 7 y. ; 1-4 � . rnW r, r ! arr, 1'I � ,.s.•ww h"',ill � s Am I 11 Pi $AST E:.IEVA T I ON Ofi 0*1" 6=TE A T OF_LAWAeaZ RT*E''T dip w-r ..r ... WA" y. I � �. Ir ill EWTFR E►EVA'rION OW ORI;.L SITS WALL AT RyME8TER AVENM J W mom �� r W �. E^s T ELEVATION Of FACILITY E I TE AT GAL I FORN i A STREET "up Am w/1AN JUL f SC"JTK 6LEVA7jON ONr FACILITY SITE AT ZwR2 ::.f2ELD AVENUE — t y' rw•,' rb, r . r i / itM I .I+•�4 Sri 1 MJ i y i .l. 1 i 7 , - tag axxxr� (W x FM "Mo rt, jM"j"MUCOMM F ! ,* OpiAty City clock prevented a commuriisnati.on from the + � t > trr►ve]►apmirt�l� Director - transmitting for Council ' e �q*A*i i ittio tho. � tsmulted annual review of Use Permit 86-7 ?� OA Corpof'at ion pursuant to Condition #53 of the ,h 4*6 044.,. 09 • apprOlVal Od modi f eatioh of . five of the original t Angus fttroloux corporation , Subject �� -�� ,Dh o bounded by DelAwarer Huntington, ' di'91 itt,0.: V goeha�►te� . the DMpaty City , Aftinishrator/Community development prosented a oil dt�d�t: ta� t� Distil ssion was he14 covor4ing the feasibility of Installing a t iltol noise- 0041tbr Mitt a printed read out to operate v0pt nuouely with the reports to be MAdo available to of ficiAls 0 ' r3ho Won Ad Boo, co"ittea . pi*cuola Wn..w44'. held z0gotdins 'r :.0,10tiod" 4 41 -p49te1n1n9 'to too Z*or aMdy Ji tion plah # The ,. Dr4 �r;,w�lI 0.7 aurrOunding th* site and they make up of the A Gaon x w• Q•. /•rl 1 f Y, ) • ' err , ` ydp Nibtttes �� Co�tno�►1JA�et�op 11/2/87 ry: atl b ves We by aseen, seconded by Mays , to modify aapd !.obi e! &"XcV 1 og Use Vormit Nob 16-7 as follows: Cvdi t,i _- 1 ' 0 efts plans dated October l 0, 1087 shall be the approved project laNyout & o�Vs heVw besa ;Oquired and ,inQorparat*d In the 9olep� 4utin4t g* coutse of the ublie ,a., " ng and donsultdtion process to mrtigAtQ Of tvaLd the siynif icant adverse environmental ` effects of the' ro j,ects the Division of Oil and Qas enrorces rules and regulations for the conduct of asaondaxy recovery aperationas the Haiti action measuree incorporated, proposed and adop so, to?other with * p�lication of the ruses Bend ragulations of the Ivision of ail and Gas# will effoctivelyy mitigate all of the adverse i"Ote idantifiodr public agencies other than I h• City, including the Division of ail and q1as o begiox:ei Water Quality Control Board and South toaat Air Quality Management District, will be reviewing aspects of this project for � mLtigptioa measures as to matters within their respoasibility and jurLsdiction, including subsurface operation, water and air qualityr the!,-critical nerd for oil reneger s infeasible the,y project or d*laved xojakltotnatives of no ect implementation, ono alternative surface ocations are infeasible because of their limited availability, or the greater Oisruption to tha coaemunity at large which would result therefrom . Except the well cellar excavation and coantructi.on be allowee, to proceed concurrently with the construction of masonry walls, landscaping and street improvements . knit 1 : The project shall fully comply with the Huntington beach Noise Ordinance. At the appllc&nts expense a continuous c4libr&ted meter Ahall be on site to monitor the decibel (dba ) level with a printed copy to be made } available to city staff and Ad Hoc Ascon Project koview committbe on ' a weekly basist. coed n1,11: prepare and submit, at Preliminary Emergency Action Flan (FAP ) prier to issuanco of building permits . A cr.Apleted Emergency Action Plan based on �s- built plans shall, be completed ant submltt*d prior to the start of coil production operations . The Emergency Action plan shall include employee training and periodic practice, how spillage canto street from siteV*) would be handled (stockpile of sand , . Ote. ) , the safe handling of any chemicals and/or materials , and full knowledge of all ` e r,iS , 1 4 ' T 4 •r r.�r Y' m r ME / a �,, -•M'r r 8 1 � � 1` r y • I sp �Al�► an%%a#F of council/agoncy 11/3/87 lo� � B�� Ind emerV64 egalpment . A coy 0411 be 4 with the fro Depa� as t an� u Oed adt IsaB1B + �� �►�diti�d �► ��� 0 contfol B � gh f aaure N to p y eo�a lance w � 4 got b*ndlinq of Sf*11S, eto. r net 4l0� 4 covered ire thereel000 -tion P141F1 ho d pleted 4114 f14 Vitt the city 11 pt�Qx 1d �ha start of oil production pe cotions e rtY I ►�iCl : ,�i, The City Council &hall review and, 1f � Ngth4la" 0" tqa� modify the conditions as Fist this use permit, At the first requlat Pik Council meeting following Beptember 210 4 ► and at give year intervals thereafter, 4 4 Don 4ny change in ownership of the pro foot IBt 000Uce between five-year revlewa j II 1;0004 that the phrase "change of ownership' a u4ed herein *hall not include any sale or ' goher tt4nsfer to a corporation, partnership or otoer form of business organisation in which hlbe;ta Natural Gas--united States and/or one or pare of its shareholders or subsidiaries owns ton c,ontrollinq interoste , or Any sale or kxonp4or so long as Angus or one of its i�` c404i044fies retains responsibility for the operation at the pro3ect . ' Rio 9#;; 4oq by tho following roll call vote: yB� WLncoells Mayer Kelly, Erskine , Green MUM 144pnistor (out of the room ) u ;n� . to C%ty MWinistrator Cook informed Council that 04t040 fax afc$ition on tnf Ad floc Ascon Project Review ; ittpa were otil being accepted . wps maaa by Winchell : seconded by !Kelly, to amend Cc» ittoq VS " to read as follows : Consl -it iop A nine member project review committee shall be selected oy city. Council to assure compliance with conaiticns of this use permit . The motll.an c4tried by the following roll call vote : hyaE : Winchall , '.Ays , Finley , Kelly # Erskine, Green Mosul alone ABSIPT : bannister ( out of the room ) ,kxSl, Cauricil"n Haniftor Utur� to the room. 1 y ' 'f ,1 �jrs.Y { . �►' �� l.Iy, ieCes, Finlay, tadla, Uuays Greens, Z�omms N��R ►�aoo A gvtiov; wag �dg 241ero sseot od b Thomas, to hold a ,point Sp�rclal Meet- fk Oatabar ',T, 1pv3 to e0641der all ego te4evelopeent ASency items scheduled r to 'be hears tto6r 20, 1980. The eotion carri'ad unealsouslyo ,.,. . . . 01 NC w wa�zzd The Astor *pounced that this eras the day and hour not for a public hearlag continued open front October 130 1954 to consider atL appeal filed by Councilman John *"hoaas to the Flawing Commission's elenial of Zone Change 86-4, Una Per- Zone Cbeule 86-4 proposes a change of zone from "01dtNown Specific Plan - Die- trict 2-0 to 01dtmm Specific Plat - District 1-01. . Use Permit 86-7 - to develop a consolidated drillsite and oil operation. The subject location is wo docks bouaded by Delaware Street to the east, Huntington Street to the neat, Toronto Aveaue to the north and Rochester Avenue tj the south. The idttyar stated that aviroomental rmpacr Report 86-10 asae3sing the eavironmen- p, tal effects of said proposal would also be considered by the City Cauacil. The City Clerk announced that an informal petition had been submitted listing approximately 402 signa.tvres in opposition and that communications in opposi- tion had been submitted by Names E. Walton. Staff reports mare presented by the City Administrator; the Director of Devel- orment Services, Scott Hess, Assistant Planner; Pass Puaten, Assistant Planner; Jim Crisp, Vice-President of BCL regarding environmental concerne; and Fire Chien Picard. P14=1ag Com issioner Porter informed to Council as to the rea- sons why the planning Commission dcaied Zone Change 86-4 and denied Use Permit 86-7. DIscucelon was held between Mayor Handic and staff regarding Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the project; and the noise equivalent. Discussion was held regarding the time to be allowed for public testimouy. SggpSer Sheldon, Kevin Williams, B. G. Williams , Edd Schofield , Nick T 1 KtM�h/y I YIYW Y IaY.lI.keRYri, i\JiriYrwyi iYrWi�ai iisM�YAay ,Mrlac an, Jo Rohri ehiGeo Me ra , Dr. �nt elton, Crab Webb, Mickel Shafer, Steven Aer lsaQsout Martha Brock, .Soho Van Haulen, Tom Van Tuyl and Kirk Kirkland o e n support oft e'`proJact. Stan Leavrence, Kobert Richardson, Ded�bright , Sharon Sarkis, Ra, h 1 oian, Jason Romeu, mauls. Rgsen, Michael. Craig,- Dolores Welton, inn Masemaa, Go T e, Nanc Hartmann presented certified copy of CC&R s, Peter � .-_ass Steven Canetos, AV t1le Sattuu, M&cf ael Ksloiaa, G or, .oZ, !fie k `•. Conley, Dirk Hartsann spoke in opposition to the project . i I 1,32 In '' • , pltp8a +to r" b41d s Was wbethat to close the p le: Marla& and aodtlaur '•', 04 t"t 44 the . j `' ' 4o t► ' �� bar X*Uyi areondad by Isilays to close the p� but b"Wit s � a6stMwo ftsauas3ov of tho matter 4t the preasat tiara. The wtteeR CAI— gibe 09. " roll Can Yet*$ 1 , . . !►r 1 1. �rterre haltyp Sailei►a a rem y1f�� k oxk Mooed Ogdi a No. 2876 for Council consideration - W Of Or MMUGM IYACH AMM00 TX2 SWIM70N OSM 0101- NT AM= SCUM 9061 TO FROVINR Ift Czt MN Or ZONING MMM a I $ 111C PAN (DISU T M) WITH O.M Sr�'E IX TO OIL SOCIFIC PUN (0 C? 2WO) WITH OIL SUMX FM DILILUNC MIMSES ON RNAI. MOPIRTT GEM- AMY LOCAM NR'TWM ORLMV.S. STRUT TO TVZ 1"T1, ROCNBST'NR AVOM TO Ta 90MO CAI-VOSNIVA SUM TO TUX WNST, AND SMJMPUU AVENUS TO TU NORT99 (ZOWE CRANOS 066-4)"o The City AttOsmety stated that CCbR's ware only enforceable between the private pertlos Mho 6%ft the piroparty. She stated there was no conflict of interreat to disAlloo Cdudcil"n Thtwo from voting on the Issue. She referred to a letter from Angus Patrolouw otatitg that there was no e=istidg contract between Angus Petroleum and Councilisan Thomas , A mot4ba was rs4e by .Salley, seconded by Finley, to uphold the decisloa► of the PlanvUl Cowlesion and approve EnvirovAeenta3 Impact Report 86-1, and deny f, Zone Change 66-4 with findin6a set forth in the octob+r 13, 1986 RCA and to .� ofty Parent 86-7 with revised findlags an set forth in the October 13, 1906 MA, 9'ollo flog discusalon, the motion failed by the following roll call J Votlt AYES: FinIny, Mandic, Bailey NOSS. Belly, fteAllister, Green, Thomas ASSENT: None A dotiQn was made by Green, seconded by Kelly, to certify 8nvirozonaLal Impact Report 86-1 as adagvate and in conformance frith Califorula Environrental I* t Report CuLdollmas and to overrule the Planning Commission decision And e to Zonoi Chavike 86-4 ud Use Permit 86-7 with findings and c6nditione as i dwd •,t'e include optiotAX Condition No. 55 pertaining to a .five member relrit* r,+srAs.ittee to voeitbr and Inspect the project; Coinlition No . 56 pertain- ins to t Ift 111iont dollar r•rust. fund that Ansue Petroleum Corporetlon is preprkr 0 ' +tr+�+� 11kh per the letter from Angus received October 17, 1986; Condition go. 51 pertaining to video camera scanning thedrill site that can b4i vii0ftd by 14-hors security personnel at the tank farts nice; and emending Condition So. X3 to change the words to read . .30 dBA. . .", and to approve introductioa of Ordinance go. 1376, after reading by title; the findings and conditions are as folloue : 1? dx.&r !or Apgryal Zor ChaN a Nit. 86-4 : I. A ci1n—e )f hone from "C+dto'wn Specific Plan, District Twos-o" ((ail Opera- tioa •.xiAudiu# Oil Drilling) to "Oldtowu Specific Platt, District Two-01" (Oil Opevit:lots Including Oil, Drilling) will be compatible vit:h surround- . a �'l. {JA 44 1 • r + r , } , ,' tik +i+ Y+a � •,r..,ay' ' W4 t tdegbitl uses, based an the sitlgation meaAurea described is the _ a fapwt report and conditions of approval outiloed In this use f repa►sed sonee eboop to aaaaistest with the goals and polleies Of the u , Plan. Unitization and consolidation of $slst oil a►peW1e48 *ptou -ad bec*usr .It meat eea the lhnd area used for of.1 faelll*$84 Orox$muslX $J woo of developable land Will became avallable after ' the consoUUtias on tha two bLoCks (3.1 acres) . 4 A JIMSf� vitb WU 15 of the Huntia4ton beach Mlut►1cip,al Code and the ullr_,,:,perett conditions of approval will ensure that the proposed use rp► *d by the sone dhange will not be detrimental to the general health, w' ita�re, and aefaty of the eo=unity. P" ' r ,r�lyairlr Uwe Pooh No. 96-7: �,. The estaolishment, maintenance and operation of the oll operation will r. not be detrivental to the general welfare of 'persons reatldiag or working ;•,' to the vicinity, pvoporty and ioprovements in the vicinity of such use or t#414f•ai based ou the conditions of approval and compliance with Title 15 of the Huntington beach .Municipal Code. 3. The propr°sed oil operation is consistent, with the goals and objectives of the General plan. oil activities are a consistent use in any land use category of the General Plan. 3. The pro,jact will consolidate oil operations in one location reducing the viao4l iispact of niwerou►s voila now spread throughout the Springfield Oil F1614 aroa . Such consolidation will also be advantageous for safety and � noire reduction purposes. The project will rasult in the abandonment and recclanation of 34 sex1sting wells and 16 oil storage tanks in the Spring- fitld Oil field area and will sot si4ulficantly k. tacirease traffic in rhat area. 4. The pra jest trill, result in increased tax rev► au►as: for the City of Hunt- ington beach and other governmental agencfee. Y. 3. 49;a41tions of approval are cissirable and necessary is order to effec- tusd sr tba purposes of the HuntLugton !teach Municipal Coda, the off3clal Ca�►t r al Plan Land Use Plan and the best interests of the City. Further, ` gavirousen -al t �' include aitiiatioo Nlsa�ruer`ea net forth in thin fiaa� Impact Report that trill assure-the location is suitable for the type of une proposed and the folloving will not result or be reasonably anticipa- ted from the projects danage or nuisance from noise, rrroke, odor, dust or Ylbration ; hazards from explosion, contamine tioa or fire ; hazards occa., sioned by unusual volumes or character of traffic; Incompatibility with ►rurrouAdlug development. And, the project complies with all requirements of Division g and other applicable provisions of -,.is Huntington Beacl, Mu>niei pal code. 6. The coaditiona imposed laclude re julremento of plans for the dispouitioa Of 011 wells and for rail opmratlona on the property iuvolved , and for berus, vs,lla and lamds+capLua to provide max1mum feasible screening of equlpsant and facilities. 4 ' N Tay 1S t 1 i 4 1 10120/16 s haws rdqu3raed r►�# Inco►rparatad in the project de" the 000016 of the I q � C"Waltatles Pmeas Ito *Mgoto or oo d %b a of " faost �Ibiwow sarirame 69904ts, of the project l 04 61 of Oil "d a&o oaforeoM !4!t MA 148 tigai for tt^.M r�0owt•.0#. �a� d !, ow + tioietl+errs i�+rrp4ratod� pea* the mg f , �►ip. tri appliestia+a o e# will otf'soi V*Iy��, "ttaft t at the E a t 4 tic ad+ oaW otbet Mon the City* ta IWI- , *I ReSimL Watse Quality Control Nmrd and � � ' . it twen! Dierirleee, will be reviewing aspteete► of f I Joct tog "tisa►tion measures as to matter# within their responal bi.1i►ty sad jurisdiction, Including subsurface operation, "ter Arad air qu&Utyp the ttiti.cal Reid for oil, rendore infeasible the alt:ernattvis of 4* pro je,at or delayed project implementatiou, and altararrtive surface tocati ato infoasihlo because of their limited avallabillty, or the z ' gr4cter 41atlptioa to the community at large which Mould result therofrore. G. The subject location is centrally located within tha Springfield Ciil field areal "rtlmot ing the. proposed project to 4nother site to infeasiblt. 9. Po substantial public purpose would be served by denial of Use Permit go. but rother s (a) It is iaortant that the united States develop its existing oil reserves in order to meet its energy needs without Ucreaslag de;xtudenc+e oa foreign oil, said this project will result in inerti+enw tal racesi►exy of approximately five (S) million barrels of all.; and (b) the project will consoli(Aste oil operations, In one locatiem, reduc- log this visual impaet of numerous wells aaw spread throughout the 014tvwra pottion df the City; and W Such coasdlidation will also be advantageous for safely end noise reduction purporers; and (d) Tba projere:t will be only an interim use of the surface site, involved, and at the termination of the project the site will be available for -recycling into other usee; and (0) -7hw, pri,*cr v111 benefit mad accrao to the general welfati of the City and the public for each of the reasons set forth above. . {f) Approval of this pto je:ct wihl reduce the immediate danand for more of skara drilling facilities. 10. The proposed oil consolidation project Brill have 24 hour on--rita "roon- ael, and will be safer them the existing nos-continuous woaltoring of tho 34 scattered walls to be abandoned throughout the area. This will, rsduce the possible attraction of younger persons. f U. The meet modem, efficient energy-saying equip"ut available will be integratted Into the design of the project which will mitigate envi,rowan- tal Impacts such to fine, noise and air pollutants. ' - ; + y ^, 4♦ . , �tr �,'.,�iW;'?�'�IiA,'�F4''M'iP""''+ �, - •fin ,, 10I 30/bb Mu tsmd a property v*l.ue protection Fly *Mob will "�p4 +,. d t . as esvtJ1 prior to driL14ag, 1' aj r,j tk t t 1"fil Nnd section drsi4g4g dot A"ua «<, :k* +tetittWlolW rppteVetd X*yoWt. c. ..riot become effective us►tll Ems Change Mae 96-4 turfs Rod procedures shall, conform to Title 15 or the Huntington `!f,'' to .• rlptl We and the Division of oil and Gas 'Standards. The app 4ga#t *haU obtaLa all trecessary electrical and bntlditc$ permits. 4. X *ures to roducee erosion should be used duirl aS ;radinS aad sit* preps- yro;ire . Gratdiej and construction activity shall take place only during 4q,44sht -hours• r; A4rtn$ !o R41n* and excavation, earthsoving crews should observe cuts and $polls r potential archaeological finds. In the event of a potential find baetp& IwAted, operations shall be suspended until the significance of.',-th* Used to deteralned. b. A dust control program shall be submitted to the Department of Wvelop- oi}:; se At •.Sq11rvttid for preview and approval prior to the iaauoncli of building �' p•�ite�r ,. Gr p 'Orior to any ra-site construction or drilling, the masonry wall and all ' uidsdapiug and street Improvements shall be iustallaJ. 8s prior' to the installation of any landscaping, a landscape and irrigation plan shall be suibs►itted to the Department of Development Services and ftblic Works for review and approval, (a) All laudecaplag shall comply with Chapter 15.12 of the %tatington beach atdi4saae Code and all trees shell be slaiavis 34 inch box type ud spaced no greareer than 20 feet on canter. 1 " 9. prior to the installation of the office structure, el,eevatlaae: shall be provided for review and approval by the Development Services department. (a) The office shall be on a permanent foundation. b� A mansard or pitched roof ,sha11. be provided. 10. The applicant shall, entex into a franchise agreeneot with the City for the instalZ.ntlon of the underground connection between the tiro bl"ka. 11. The proper aeaellag and abandonment of the erlatin$ scattered wells which will be replaced by this project shall take place following approval of this project and must be completed within eighteen (18) months. � , 1 mob MW ;'�• r 110JOW 09 the site s"U be 4+ar*"%U1y OMWA Vita as sopR $* ate �, t�mnt aw11 wb, t to rov14r Md apptoV" of %"l" tt ' i b�1 ocau W&I ealls*er •bail be oa�itts4 to the O . A- 14"Uts tor toview a apptroW" Petor to sow- !' b1't p at and plojeot dU owwd Irv+*1i �a ptr wety 1las aid jacwt *aesid"tiatl property ism barb 41l MA wit%Mt an acoustical blanket on the d l.ling rig and aertteo rigs Ili* rarpr itt r all Indicate aoish atteauotion awares aewry to assur* compliant• w1th the Reatia8to►n Ammh ftlea Cade mW a ., "X souse l wi st tka residentlal property line of 50 dHll during the sigbttllaes boars boVAG'a 1000 Pt and 7:00 AM. (a) A double acoustical blanket enclosure uhall be provided at asn-door 14, poise attwAuation for the drilling operation$• all operation and service ope:ratiom shall be provided pursuant to the Oil Code and noise report gps+niWA in Condition 13, (ap) If• a aoAse problem occurs, the entire drilling structure shall be gipped with an acoustical blanket for greater notes atten"Uos. 15. The project shall fuily comply with the Huntington beach Noise Ordinance. He No speakers, laud bells or buzzers shell be **played on ait*. y'`.. 17. Utteelve vibration, as determined by the direst or of Development Ser� vlaw, shall be radueed t* acceptable levels. 18. Light and Slat* shall be directed and/or screened to prevent "spillage* veto adjacent noesidectiael properties. 19. AU heavy trwk era M shall be Baited to the folloving stvaet• betv+ean the 405 fray the subject site: Batch Boulevard# Adana Avenue, a►red DoUvon gtmets for entrance to the site only sp►rsn6field Avenue sad California Street my be used. 20, ilk,• ta+ Ma oheLU be Itafted to the hours between 1100 AM and 500 PM. (s) No trucks soy park on the street. Cb? Truck deliveries shall be staggered so that no sore than two truckar shall be om the proms{-sus at any one time. 21. All employees must park on either cue of the two sites both during con- _ str+action and after. 22. Lccsl streets affected by truck traffic shall be Laspoeted before and alter coustruetion. Any damage to locarl streets by `heavy tftehs shall be �,�� repairod sad erostwcted per City regwiremeats at tM expense of the I= AU dr#"Mrs sbail M radias type and cc" tnwtsd to Pubiia lierke rtan-� 4ordeo A 1 I r " ��� �1swt�A •IIII i1I/��/� r 1 1 OWU be so 404, 40 Or Mat of wehl�ss f roe tbo ding sits IA9 IN oM 7 800 M *Mftt lost eOft"47 PO ;eo • 'r L'.'�IL 1 , Voxodg ibvvUbe obtalusd fatplN 14t7 r" mo (a X24a#rod) ;'• r , %*# leWW to bi moved sa VAbUc stmts. t t'rlwgb Mroob water bear iaede SMU 'bll 1s� rM ter intmelas late t$a a4alfaro. r <. t treotiago and releaeing store draleraAe most be 4.,by 00 gpplic*pt and approved by Public Works, s� ��g bring "at, be treated aW a permi t obtained a to moat Ora"* County tat�eyn trIct and City Tire Department stands As prior to batiks nl" ad -nto the surer system. `• P9. aftycl-Lag of produced sons hater back to the oil reservoir 0all be cart-stied �y-tha b gional Water Quality Control Board and all its cmAttloa►s restrictiape 0411 be adhered to. . 30. ' Veil service rigs shall be operated no ire than 48 doys per year between ; 700 AM and 700 PM or daylight hours, whichever to shoat*t. 1• o ,.: t*n fever well service rigs may be on the promises at any one t 'l'he sorviae rigor shall not exceed 100 feat in height and abash be ` bla o"#Fled and utilise acoustical blankets. 3#. All drilling rigs and production wells oWl be operated by elattrical motors and electric pumps oraly4. 33. Tha driLling rigs, shall not operate for any longer than 2 years during Pipe One. $4. th Wing rips after the two year period for the remaining 14 wells Masse Two) shall comply with the coaYditions herein and arty not be installed jn. ditlonal two years. The second phase drUling shall be limi- e� to ;00 AN to 10:00 IN on,Xly. 351. brillins darriclts shall not exceed 142 fact In height. 34. Qlkgg tmpletion of initial drilh,Ag of injection and producer scallop all � dxilliag rigor shall be removed from the site. I , r - i 37. Service rigs shall be erected, only during ,saintenance operations. 36. Applicant shall install blowout prevention equipment. 39. A full vapor recovery system shall be installed. 40. Only three on-site crude oil tanks are peraitted and shall never be com- pletely tall at orce. ;l. Prior to Issuances of building permits, at eaerteency action plan, includ- ing euploy*6 ter hang and periodic pracxtce, shall be developed by the .•• • appllLcaot with consultation from the City and other rsgulatia* agencles. ?ha - plan sbould lrnraleede hoer spillsga onto street from site(s) t aaU be / .. 4. h > 0~11 Wow,,... �t�►r��/� *9 O *)I the *a* banwas mt my otb r :.md/et 0 01ell apstmo md emasw ► r alsnt. A 1 be so too 4150 Iis+se Departeent sied np"ted 00 a ft" year 42. Al -.611 mot bo' 't"Osport4d by Pipallas. $us saweseion mfmtAft $ha►ll M lastselied as a primgy source f fib p +tdtipn. 44. Caller rag6lrae44ts for oil wallas (a) hurt b4 pwoviAod with heat detection system Prow caller to 24 hour s�teitoris8 laaatiaQ (b) fins extinSulabwrs ,approvals by the Fire Deepaxtmeut must be installed w1thle 75 feet of travel. (c), Paravlde •atal epee ,brats covets over top of Moil, collars. 45, Storaois teak requiremestat (a) Musthave pre,-plumbed foaw ,injection system installed on all product storooA .tanks. (b) , Must bays exterior delole water tprey rpttee on all storage males. 46. Sita, ,regteitsesicat•f 17 t W Al.,l diked arease must have an engineered dr4loage s, stage. (b) Foam *tursSe area and foam quantity to be approved by Fire Depart- (c) Fire hydrants to be located In areas approved by Fire Vtpartmsat4 (di:1 liYdrola."AUJAS , doteutio+a system approved by hire Department to be ti l,tuytslld�.'a4d►,�Otoj*4L Verimmter. ,(Q) ftra +ext U4*bAXm approved by the Firm Department must be ip�stah�d f al CO"bmt,..t site. "l , Sots, c gs least be 14 f eet iu vidth and iastallatioe tusk tOr17 Witb Fire Departi+.at Specification 403. 47. well collars shall be cleaned periodically to prevent waste accusulation. 48. Treaty (20) abasdoned yells have been identlkied w1tttin the project area whtah do not aeot preseat day sbandonseut requirements. A contingency 01sn.-ob4l be out,11an i and submitted to the Huntington Beach Fir* Depart-no most for rovlev and approval with stops to be t4L*a is the wheat that leskala reeve any of there abandoued wells f.icAs its way to the su rfac.4. 4f. 1fi6s to ,tewostloa of the 032 operation,, a p1Aa shall be subadttod' sub- F, tq v , 04: appronl of the Fire Dapartagut mW 'Dsvelapm tt Sew rt rr "Owl" bw tlbt site *lash 10 ab�dme-i maJ rest ,red to s its rl*Nest 04torel state. Y • , h I 1 U ( WAD �TI uaall, minutes 101'9.0186 plysl�lls tobstr"Cloo activity outside the Irma except 8 10,-7100 AN MW 4000 Wo Mi"War tbro4h Ist-aroy OGXYt asthod a o of all rtaovery f or this project shall be 2W tee to .:�. tow lg5ga ► way. Std&g in4ett jan shall be prohibitod• a; ran . opatatat *ball at all timer during the term of We Uve peewit mad �l B RMe1si thereof s "LUats is forte mom iaaur4244 alley . of polipa+ p imsurimg the aperator, aad .as additional iasoreds the City of Nuntingtao beach' the City Council &ud eeaeh member thereof, and every ��. off lear an4 employee of the City acting fat the due course of his employ- meat at in his official capacity, against liability or fimancia1. loss per-�z resulting frot ofty suits, elaisa or actions brought by any person or seas, nor! from all casts and a ape ases of litigation brought &&&Last the insured@, In Via amou►it of not leas than. $5,000,000 combined sitglee limit for any Jujury to parsoes or dasaga to property, Including, (but not liml- ted to) injury ar damte from subsidence and rebound, resulting from the operator's all drilling and production &ctivities and operations Inciden- tal thereto. Sold policies shall. provide that the llnsurst�cee coverage shall not be cancelled or reduced by the Insurances carrier without the City having boon given at least ten days prior',, *ri,tttu notice thereof by such carrier. The operator shall not cancel cr reduce said insurance 4.9va rage. At all times during the term of this use permit, and any � reasaal or extrnstan thereof, the operator shall maintain on file with the .City Clerk a certificate or carLificates of insurance i,onl,gd by the ,- Qgr r:,or or adttlero showing that said insurance is io of fact la the amount roquiir&d abo ab, and u copy of. each insurance policy. If the oper- ?`,� Ator does not keep said insurance in full. •forcee and offs ct. the. City asy ` obtain said ine.;cr��:e: anal pay the premium thereon, which sbAll than bo deemed a debt •owned by the operator to the City. Any itsuirarncef policies procured by the operator hereunder shall provide that the insurance car- ;, tierr walve:s all, rights of subrogation against the City. if the City obttius any policy of insurance hereunder, such policy shall Irclude a vai.vty by the iusurauce carrier of all rights of subrogation against they operator, 53. Ttia . ty Couotil ahalll .,review &tad , Af n;cess*ry, may modify ihr con . di- r t1 ;s a s Noe, forth in this use permit, at the first regular City Council aseoting following October 20, 1937, and at five year im erva.l a there_, gt+er, and upon �wx change .la ownership of the project which occurs ' tw*04 fiv►a-�r"r review ; provided that the phrase "change of oftership' 'as ds64 herein *hall not include any sale or other transfer to & corpura- 00n, partoetlship or other foray of businosf urganiaarti.on in wtalch Alberta lutural Gas-United Stttes aedlor one or wort of its shareholders or sub- si.dlaries owns the contrallina iatereacs, or any sale or trauaofe;r so long as Aagu4 or *as of Ito subsidiaries retains responsibility for the opera- tion of the pr,aject. 54. The planning 0waissionlCity Council reserves the right to revoke this use permit if any violetiou of these conditions or the: Huntington beach Ordinanca Code occurs,, l). A rive sermber review casmitteet shall be selected by the: City Co-,i :il coax• pulsed of three property owners, who reoido. directly ard�ace:nt to the prow Ject site, one nembev of the Planning Commission aad oae Clty Council m4Wbor. The Firm Department anti Development Services Departmout sh&11 �.40 NT iol I f 4 ►�y f sit pop s staff lia l.scrA. r.se purpose of Ma cs .tte* sh411 be " AM at ter PC*J tct 4)a a yv►ertealy "aa4iM duxin the dirii.l-•� r � aral ► -s�om►nal�►�t th+stata�E:er r, '304 slut pt#t*ctioet plan subelt*aed by the applicant shall be 'pl�t�t ' 10 ii outl3,+d►fW ptiat to d rl ll ad. 7M ;h t:h# 44"t *bit #d ft t Me of the two Mocks is to its without 24-hour tJddb tg*4tat sbail bs ae loyed on-site to provide continu- vUth, ein bae amitored by paorsorAdl at the otter site16 :$ '1 avirsooftkal tmpAct Rapert was pi ap4red is ttoplIance with the 'a 160'a"At-00- UJIL qutllty Act and the State CRQA Gaidaeliaes. 14 T1ei► t4stl Iftvixal eltal lapsat deport le an iafatwstiondl 40timent which 140 d Ibld eity Coup :l1 mind the general public Of #br an-itoonent*1 ftt. ;t i Whibh was road, reviewed and tousidered by the titylI :J0, *9 atatUds its deeleion on the projedt. p» VLfraMeta l Upatct Report contains diiecussions of the siguf•- fte F Mltwir dtal mifiactr which cannot. be a�vulded if the project. is 1 -i�o a ltt+ it tt,�gsttob "aduree proposed to Alulisiae the ee1golficaant � + tt ; ' tstWiWs to the pro jecc , the relatlau xhrip b►etveea laical � rt ' a1t+�►�: 6% of t4d 44viratibent and the assitdtenaace and dnMntaaeat of ut* p4. tt ' t i sts daehts of sigtxiixcrmit ifrra�vdrsih►le enviran ,e�i1► 1 h "If Leh ofill tdOult fro& the project wid the growth-induc:ag lalpmidt of tha Actiob, 1. JMftN*4WVhtA1 Impact Report contains the comonts and recom— a;t , ti A, R,IF,44 as the Ptatft gnviro ettaei Upact kepnrf. Alist Of pq 4MW-t t#At3 t11e stud public adenciea consulted an an d coaeating on lbfttt trir tltael Ieapect Report , and feboobtea to significant vaylp"nt4 , p+r0166e raised 1a the preview Mtld twoultstlen proceas, a aotida of %Lou of th.0 final fnviroftentAl 1AVAct PAIwift was filed of AgLancy As raquitdA bf jev. i f� i1 t a tha 11W EuY3tonnentol Impact Itae tt thare 4*te been r �a p• �'. 106' t do aT lit • b ,.this . pf"Q seteaS pro�ec , cr it, tha cl�td+uu ts,c►c4as 4W't Ait ` ft bo uadbaCtikaaid, of tis laiticta~ativt�r u�ich the ft", 17 favIrbumbtal 148et swPort is therefore 0000 04, The �4 :Witola iW pail call vo- ter yqy , q" i tip. •�1� ; + 4; i il.• I,4 , ._t?T Iu ti ., I M+ty+t ca end • awteeauis of CouwLi qt 1.1 :20 P,M# '''he aw etlog, was reconvened st irJl:xS F.He 141 &ehz w l V Y 1 II i� ORDINANCE NO. - L.0 • 1 All ORDIA"CE OF THIS CITY C F HUNT'I NGWN BEACH AMEND I NO THE HiRIT15 11 93ACH ORDINANCE CODE BY AM14DING SECTION 9061 210 FROVIOX FOR MWE OF ZONING FROM OLDTO'WN SPECIFIC PLAA IDIGTRICT ,'WO) "TH OIL SUFFIX TO OLOTOWN SPECIFIC PLA19 1. (DI I'CT TM) 111TH OIL BurFIx FOR DAILLIXG POISE$ ON RRAL FROrXXW'Y dEN KLLY LOCA'ITD BZTWM DELAWARE STRUT TO THE BAST, ROCHRST A 11VMWE TO 'THE SOUThe CALIrORNIPA STR33T TO E W "Tv AND $"ZWWZELD AV TE TO TM NORTH (ZONE CHAN(M CASK d88-11) E :"*MRZAS, pursuant to State Planning and Zoning Law, the Huntington Beach Planning Commission and Huntington beach City Council have had separate public hearings relative to Zones Case No . 88-11 wherein bath bodies have carefully considered all information presenter at said hearings, and after due consideration of the findings and recommndation of ,the planning Commission and all evidence presented to said hear Iings o the City Council finds that such X6114 change is proper and c«nsistent with the aeneral plan, WX, THRRMRZ, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does ordain as follows : SECTION I . The following described real property, generally known as the Full block bounded by Delaware Strest to the east, Rochestox Avenue to the south, California Street to the went, and Bpringtiold ?*v6uue to the north, is Hereby changed from nldtowit 'p BpelSn;.: atfct Ttir61-0 to Oidtawn Bpsrcific plan (District 'peed 12747 being 0 subdivisian of lots 1 to 20, inclusive, in nisi ISO 4 of the Vista Del Mar Tract, Huntington Beach as w if y recorded in "Ok a, Page 15 of the miscellaneous Maps of otano�t Cciunty'o Ch. Y�1 dCTION 2. Suction 8061 of the Huntington Bench Ordinance frode, District Pimp Z (Sectional District Kap 2-6-11) is hereby � nded to reflect the change contained in this acdit.ancer and on the may attached hereto . The Director of Comminity Development Is bombs directed to prepare and file an amended map. A copy of said district prep, as amendeal, shatli be available for inspection in the Office of the City Clerk. , hl 1 r'�d�d'r e•�`f s . This 64SO01100 Oell take effect thirtr Digs after by the City Cou«ci I of the City of ����' �; ••, .# �i t l` ,M 4 gjWjjpt ,tooting thereof t4jd 'on the day Aye '•'�,•,1 ..r .. ✓..•IJ.� I..�JI•IY �.�,'� '. Y� , ��� •.;��;•M'" ,fir"r.'F;•�. P 4$ 1140,41 77 X=W AND AP�P's T�� � An API , r it , city R or of r r 7 i r. ,•� l V' J��.• 4;r } �•Vet r �I r ',fir Ir� , �' j '�I • r,�f I ,,y�,r '1 '•• err n , '� r,lp ili . 1 f4� t� ij . } r• 1, krA .r:� 1 u y�1�,h,r�y,r ;�i .!•"'}i; ^.��.y,�j�er,T} �• r.�,'.I, !� �� Y�`'��''�Y�� ,'a k r � 1 ! + 1 rrfl e �jl�y� r,T�dL rt r , ,! a�.� .yE f�r",r .•l, �' 'i� r �. 1�. .fl r 7 �r `4 pI 1F44`, .•',�" r�4,� !�) 'f'�i ���: ,�.,�'M st{E�� '� 4i��1. � ,,.� �,�' •, M •,JI 1'• ,L r' Arr !v �'H•�4' Yt��i'�}�, �r"=7 f �y 1.)(,API .'ry „1 �r �'',4 �; r .�.�r 1•�a.1' (+��1� ��}', St'r�4' ;r, ' ;}�, y .it + •r• .(' r.� r r"r' B 'L�,. •1 � r,�r•�ri r.,JI I� �{ r �' S '�hs*' '�9{o(�h ,��rr�,. °Yr,•� 7 � ` '"d�,• .1" ^� �y^T V',l,r� Il wrr �i ` '�� i�f,�� � �l iyy,,r . "rr,if X ,•tri ran �1r✓ t, h' d` ti, , wi1tt' g)J4��� �i} •y r�, ` ';, ,,,. �..t, .1, ,.; .. ., :I F�., 11 .1 •; r r I ,.5. ri. i r , , r!r.' .'lt, .�L:1f�.1, ��. �nL_..aid...i•_.r..,d,r\.:u. rb ._u. .' _. 1 r 44 Commmsamcs pr. SeadW Office Park 'A 2134 Main Street, Suite 20 Huntington Be&6, California 92648 (714) 53E-1437 �,�•.IY�Y•M,i.M�•11f. .+/.,Yy- uu/ /_��I inn.,i.,.-- , 1 . Gwernmem Relatiom• Environmental Regulations • Project Permit ";.1" 41 r Aug 12 1988 0Nrtment of Development Services t of t ton Beach 20'D main $treat ���°,�,,�.• `" : ou iaotoa Beach,, California 92648 .. ti. Re; prison of Current Springfield Project to Prior Prof ect r" Voor y t.ial , 1 , M t compare �atu @ f the current that 7 oar the to r a c t / �• A��I ! Project with. those of the original proposal. Isks Vditt'et, att"Pts to list the significant chinges. They WWI „ � , • , t,. . Oil recovery was originally 'tod at approximately 5 million barrels. Further "ring has allowed that estimate to be inortased to J ' •';., E t',` toly S million barrels. 1'h site plans f� than Prta jest are �: ++:f►, ` :Y,,',r.''` . ', 111t, ..bar inally s►toposed. they are the iili r µY'1 a +s•',;' � } , J ' IAA 1p ,•. � oved by the City, W /. 104 y` ' rlr� w Cd itication of Cad4yti+^1ft 0i of '• oio, features of, the r*visdd t s , 41 Won collars have beon downsix,04 to a {V I f Is rather t.` an the 8o wolls includesirii1Z wv�y�d /yam y` f �M r The over all in ad* ha!s been g. 1►t below street grade in order to reduce i arW provide greater water retention (Tho elevation of the oil handling tanks is • COW fore ' lowered to six feet below street grade. ) '?be we ter handling tanks and equipment were recrionted ft91r9, t1ho area Previously occupied by a residential. � sti uctuto at the northwest corner of the site . That modification allows two smaller t;aenko to be substituted ' ANiat64 & : Naustoa. *W Wrsftin8tar, IkC. •rye, i � I ' ' 1 �1�, for tie single large brine water storaGo tank . The separate tanks ar'e four feet lower in height than was the ;. niggle tank. The ubove a►odificationa resulted in a minor relocation of both drivetvays (off Huntington Street " Californi4 gtreW aid gates in to the facilities site and office. � - The original SIR included 4o errtimate of %W m i number of 'omloyoes and contract personnel based on the p+osibility of using two drilling rips siimItaneouely. The current pro s F ;,•,': :, ai is for the use of only one drilling 49 . The r irod personnel and resulting trip generation has be 4a redumd rdingly. WNgas at n „Mid - The prior project wain to obtain brine wa iE for initial injection and as make-up waiter in the production process from either now brine water source wells or from wases water frown existing oil production activitina . Tbo source of the necesimary injection water has now been Y' + otorarioad to be surplus bcLne water arv-eilabla at Chevron's for troatment plant located ne dr Clay dtrert west of $olderiwe8t Street, The brine water to be used in the 8O:r ngf1v;d Project is now being disposed of by discharge in to the sanitary mower system. Wa � ,�,, The original prc�jeot coat®mplatsd that cort4 o surplus waters including storm runoff and surplus aduce+d . water might be disposed of , as required, by ischarge into .ei.thrr the sanitary savors or b� pert to the stcrbnd�' Lax , The current project has been modified to be a *zero rector dischn�rge" facility. The project will contain or {ti. W �► I w aterm+ ow sits incl wings make-up voter; produced Storm ruhoM and/or • f li,7n fighting water. After i tAQ4 ttqoting any such wators will be in j eats in to ream 1060miro - The prior project provided for it qt ,.of 29 of wells and 9 tank Onterriiee The • providers for the aba�indoent bf1 rrlls grid di f f erronce In ail & result of the wells ,�.. 't i .`" I1 4 4t Mve rlr 4 b +II►hMr dOned a ither by 10rotion car other prMrty in conJunction Or pro396t. , l 44*40 $WVWWte4 to i nolude all the . significant differrenc*s b9twson tho ' cur.rently proposed Springfield Project and the prior pro *ct. �f 4my others came to mind, 1 will be certain to 0411 MOM to yorr attention. Please let me know if any further W000stion on thew changeo is needed at thin time. s r �l yM,�:'r tla!• ��1�_ � 1 �. � � ';1��11MV 1 1 1"• yyyy� I 1 1✓{ 'rIL,1l� 1, �, � r� '�Rl�r'� r r'fi ei 4' K, -�Iaq iroe with me tr�a t a 11 the above changes have .0 tber rod. i r ,; r IWO)Wt Cts or have otherwise provided fo +I% 4n environnwntal axWt of the project. Ir 1 ddbrt D. `arfidehikol 1 p1� AAW / r' (fie M'• � � ♦1 ;f. 1 1 r h. •r' l,r.�, i •'hr�lti i:�' r. 1;�. 1 Y 4 p Y + dab July 11 s l9al �1,,, #dKF CEAtIFIED OUGM ACCOUNTANT of I4NI CALOORNIA STAEEt C HUONOTOR SEACN, CALIFORNIA 92040 r 111v llorIoOa blv Jolth Resikifle 1011tyal. of Huntington doa'tcti MONO 140lfU11 CpAS city CIILMdIhNM� ItIV C* COAX �ig11<'# It Street ►.�retifris r.. IlU14 1 bg tort 11coarl1 j CA 92648 CALIOCM141A ANb PfNNSYLVANIA rat: silttNOPIl.Lb PAW ECT ( day, Angus puttoleum Ct)rporatloa ) Dear 04Vof F3,Akin+e, has y6i1 t'hh see f roafi oUr address above, we live Ind work dlrer, tty acroNN L;.ry street, from they proposod Springfield Pi ojeci : We ' re wri t i hX to let you know we laght to see the ptojec t gb tot f■d its soon an poHsi b 1 e ., kztural'ly , we are concerned with safety # noise a bd property va l uis-, bltt we feel Angus Petroleum Is vespendingt to these concertls : In rout, deliberntttirya we regUOIet thlit the praject be ap' ravad and that it inrl ude the I*nllcwing priv: lions : *Cp!slpl i a>`hee wi. tli all safety staalrtdatrdu. �Oampl6tion of streets aLnd sidewalks as at priority . GCompletion of laicfidscaping and permanent wall (high efiovgh to block any unsightly view from a>t second story ' w�itld000r;`. , &9aund'oi oafifig and dusk control during drilling phase. a8pr'l•bgfield pronPrty 'crust (as previously ptoposed) . 1' As you y knaw from coo-reupondehce on file, we Initially bphoRod this project . 140WOVer , we SUbat-quently reconsidered and cha n#ed our pogi t ion . This; thePefore , given you the right, td change your mind , too , since you ran ,your campaign oppo-ving the Springfield Plooject . At aattly rate , please tfhdot•ktantl that the "Cincerned Citiaenii" geoup does not spersk for um . r si nctt•r 1 � , Boyd D. wheolor• Linda L . Whoolvi• cc : City Council 4embers City Planning Commissioner &, Members Angus Petroleum Corporation Davis Consullantt , Inc. Editor, Gawa>tnge County Regi titer i A, ,{ ,' t ;" � t_ it•',,' t ' vi $)81 Molokai Dr. ; Huntington Beach , Cal..9264E L September 20o 1988 . 07, akS �,!fyr•s.' 1 r w F) The Monors4e John Erskine, tero ' } iAnti,gton Beach, Dear ' Nayor grekfne s Upon di'soussing the case of the Angus Company petition -,{ to consolidate their wells in a one square block area which would be camoufla,get and noise monitored, it seems to me, in view of the ndttion-wide search .for new sources {� of oil, the petition should be given serious thought and ' Fair ,,consido ration o { It, ikppears to me that if safeguards are taken to insure the fulfilm4nt of oompany promises , the proposed develop - M*nt would -be a good deal for all concerned - including an added source of revenue for Huntington Beach. The sewage • tr ea'tntnt plant, the Edison generating plant and the Ascon dump are all close to my home , but these things have not ruined the beauty or serenity or lowered property values of my neigdrborhood. Sincerely, :•'„ '�,t Don Van Sickle E C E I W E is.t � SEP 1 ti CLT.Y OF HUNTINGTON pW%H C,r" COUNCIL. C1 m"X � h I I Afly r R YA •,`, it •1,' hff,. rY 262 Gradsda Avsnult Cttrober 69 190 , CWiruu Vittetr lsipsig slid Planning Cosoission "bere � Hwstis$ton Softh PiAMUg Cosoi salon in str4wt : t#u too ashi OA 92646 ko r Chats Leipzig anal PlosniRg Commission '41ftts I ' Thia iattet to is regard to a Plusiiry Co` tsion hsanuS ou • r ta►rfs � ci • P�'�P bf'•Ar 06tripiew stAdk1 trU�� a >letandsrf rocovoryr ptogts% ab thb old lid* lot aid f old. Staaoa ever tlb 'Pot 861ee03, ' that d 14wga rook of recorsrabis oil rt ne tyre foie of that field. toot OftoWary recovery Methods eftld extract ailliaos � `'t61 bal of '4urlity oil* �#►ro 1"afits -of , :,.�. two "I +A+w661gh OW sbott-twa iftat" 1iofte that My 4n '.yIraftlt drta�iiegasiYitiafr . 'fir 6 is the 166WINto vicirrft • Vill rid ogle •o . + . ice . d tbta - . from Ow Oval of g ightly W Now city of Nift tes C� 'i roa+rirr A,Cal rasa f"m the pre joet i �1 '��iderisg th's roduattiv is oil tsplorstioa �rf o WO : Afti ra it" 04001"s at the c'I ; ref of I'. k rho dd dow!1 � apt oil i ar W-'iwtmwt"warists to Otcot d Net davolbPOO atrtatr to dngMar i 11t tMmn indtatlew 099011 of row f" city , giictral f fits• r . -7WW,�- alb s,;i", ' i';'1' Rl 40 1 �f• yy �1F'I J�� �11' Caa+Y (tills* Qt -TI cot , N f r„ ra �r• � �a�wa „ ,w } V 4 j: vat,( . + cc x JdK4,14k oj #'t*6F-k"j 441 &JIJ 11 a Oro SPA �1 tc cell— i X /W ,Y Ceorge Corry 1801 California StreL-t Lily 31), 1486 Eluntinoon` lieiqch , rA ,y 4 icy. +'I M. QF Roj)ert Mal 11diC cit . QqqC4 tigpoers "011111W . Woos, S;}. Ala 4, A C040a#� �Ia+ Orm s my r1400 '' y IK ' `l` +� �1 are har�ear�neF p the above toted k'; . n oro vary co nce*Oed About a pro j ect review Y 0 PlOnnin� Cq� �# nAden eametime�+� � ts �+hi .c.h wegll to ' t 50 - 90'i'low,a ' weM aver A period of two ( 2 ) yearA. Apawt 041 C4. has U�chpaad �ti�p blacks q� l anc� i a W which there Are A.pprgx tme toly s x hoes on p resent 54' Thts ri n aphlfAd d ijj xi a �1 �ocq $ Qt eoti Ce�t@1 c�1'piA treayyY, +n ind r Raglheq t10 ° ,r,' 114 p1 �'� Nd�d rQP k W �� J. 44 T F`+M nY tid vl�x teOwoi*t i' "04 on q gt4oi , The value Af khe project � -; 14i coo$* of �a 5 1 1 have beal1 wAtehitla the City of licintington 5eeoh develop end t ` ., Me what has he'cn A "wed hotlpv�x th4V* seet�x to he nq way s :ch it. plro ct a�-IMA, ali& 44da cc'y1d he �gA4kVUctsrd and not Crave j4p strect on l:hA 11 h ►arhao�� . I hAve J%4s � recently received the 9nvt'O.r�tmgntal 0 .p4 'Ispark Apo t Am col�corTloA about a few thim6a Ln which ` , Wo4ld j i�o you to raytew And consequently , r e s pip nd w l iq �q �e ,' qt 'A ' e i d � one M 1a tiq i a years NOO,VA - Ao 40yi t Yprl , Su4mitoo ws thAt this drilling ' ; .,, c e srt ,ag..,,1r►� � that bo A ot4jsAnca? The 910 report is not 44taijed Anoush to rA ppdA to the affect the poise l.evgl will 000 qn thO s4Krgeln4tin 90s1d*n%r A$ ar-sally Pt "i ht . ; }i�r►e ab ut ti lAg , th dF' 1' in psriO to 04y time pours "�Y l M*i "t4*4Pr.d ai the w0141 'This vttj 'accul': After the wells are ` t rig le' a l,et U e Tat need to�. p d � x AAy they hAvA v W14 � hg 1. C1**m6d ., tV0 t$mes pqr . This a e1�Won takes a :proximately too +days POP, well. wich kquals l, D sIA s ayt of to year a poll iog rig gill be uperat. tng on the a 'tie creating nurse . Perhaps ynu can regtjost that they tnsulpte these p4l1ing rigs even thous h the actual work occ4rs r wry ng the daytime hours . What about the neighhors that work out of them .homes , have dart ima boarders , and the people that work at ' night , will this noise create a nuisance i,,t their zase? continued . . . � 1 �6 : `•non=.,r. � �n �� ' '', "y — n ry nd iy•�r= ,r' 1M ` "'I ,�' '� ` .'•r..,� ,' VOW Y.r " F�F f, Mayor Mond tc a� r + '~ City Council Meta he n ' 'Pager TWO know that a pulitng rig will exceed the City noise ordinance It on-16suloted. PI*ese respond on this Frith your views . ')�a 00 an is its limit 0e amount of wells to be drilled which in tuii ##tit Oder0se the maintenance . ,a � .o a r�ea surrounding �n industrial site. , s puarc a,se ray d L first ome and concerned that rf IWO v4s to, occur and I hard to aatt my home, how J .buyortsfeel about buying a home surrounded d. R t p Y y y Y ai lin � ;1 a �►: eratin �4 hours !a ? Would you bu hkc�a %ecrovs the atceet from a project like this? 1= � ) niR . This land i s currently zoned as "a" which ex e$s l >.•;,:; r UKts 'aw .dri.11,in o erattons . To allow this prci ac � o k'0E ., ty: . as to re-aQr�e tnia araa . The ar�n ng i wr t ten to protect the residential area from now w .I drilling. Flow can you allow this in a residential area { F ` : which has been zoned for residential units . What ood is so(sting :i f you chantis i t all the time? I t g y � was irr i C i,el l to # tJ . '', �" ta allow: the ex�stin wells Co C4rttinui pumping ►, -�.,� rrhl.4h t# ft r since. they have teen home many years . Ass- t Tha MR, ceprprt atstaa our homes are 10 to 15 'homki, is Only 7 years old . Still the block Ws l l surrounding the site bland or semi match Bach type o( ' housiag facture? The homes alnn California Street between itGo q*tgr and :SprirkStA.gld h4Y& . bric ac �t , �ti l this black 4 ;h l * iitcfi p ,0Into l t dsa'f ? landscaping h��' , i.• a �,. . , , �► ii �u,t ,;, i +a ,.rFae r well (041hta.lq d, bond should b* velk this. We sugaas t that you ta�'ke � s 4 rive by ; ,.; i10 a 4�4 take a look- at then. , TUe siWod, 4 . .sft back fat .a rasitlentiolhome is a , 5i, 144 this to 40 thdustri,+al use, wouldbt t `;you t��r ' rep that ' et backs �houto b ur ar th�a.. lei fact xn w� r �� ;� w , h;�y�+d� ;d. a l�:orr ew� lai r bu +aa �ot��e, bk t�t an . t 'e #I t* ,- sP � . � ifi4-v,*stdtvn�a. it w6uid ,,alum dearoase the paust4iliti.es Accift0to , it Most. be noted lhit thew rigs stand a ,;, , 'fulr►��d � feet in the "air; anci if use accident did c,ccvr , Y ,%,`;• ; t k� wouto e;fec t, the res i4 enc.e. C) Alternative :sites . I would, proppose that they drill near the lbw c *:)ter�wfirch is a commcrM L zoned area. Of course , it would, cost the,- of l company more money to drill from that loca,tiono heowever , at least it would blend in better . coat i,nueG. . . -2 - p r 7- 6 ., . J " . Jos y au , 19H6 Mayor plant!i.v. C i t y Counc:i i Membe r 4 Page Threw ii) Please read page 7-1 o4 E Lg r+port on alternatives . I { persona'11y ado not like to be threatened by a condominium praitct being deveko ad vs . a residential pco jest . I f f a; ` the Olaoflin cdtmisoron con see condomi.ni_-ms brie developed on a . site tgstt o1rseady has homes vs* it and oil weds , they must be btifid. Altos I believe the intensity shouLd be i reduced . As ii' matter at fact: , this project rhould not even oe allowed in a residential area as already stated . i ) This ILIA report does not address the homeowners concerns and Is very biased in oy opinion . Please read Environmental Check list forms , yoU will note , there sure is a lot of maybes . J) Please preview the Angus OLL Company for financial status and peovious experience in projects of this t,y e . I can' t under%*nd with the oil vW44,46co ttid klease 'OF ail beingg as low *s they are , how t hts prdJatt couLd , be +ecotiomicsily fear L + th04a times This peice a property has been � hpn . "gate nhd his hsysr bean deva la ad by a _ large tty. ,tiftf Is 'this $01teon 0i pi'oe ct grn at the expense of the rrdstitlamt ial neighborhood? : Uhat ha pens ,y if the pco ,ct. d6esn� t produce as expected ? Vi ll it be re-� xnrietd tja�`��1'-' t 4m closing With the hopes that you will look at this situation from our point of vier as homeowners , not future income to the Ci tf ; or the elli.mi.natfan of exiati.ng wells in the surtroundiing aro3s , betousie euent.0 ai. Ly ) these wal.Lr will d*plot+ thelis*1vase. The I Angus tail o pony is I"Isriffilhg this is " a unitizatlon pr+didet in {: ree it#. �'` it is a n tr«:tl n� pro fact in a roitt.d+etttisil area - lghich is a it the s0vt1*1 Orvftnttnt.a , I hone I do not �atAd tr, ar>:og.a n t , however , I am upset set what i I hati~e bears heari,n sand seeing in regards to this project , and I do nok, bali,eve it f.3 in the bolt 3ntere2st of the City at! of the f surrouttidia' g area . 1 look forvard , yokiiti p>rampt response . , 1 arey , r� J r GaVrg@ Co A ry Planning Commission 4 Staff City Council Members 1 1 :1 I. 17 NO CGMPAft LOM Due% wo 13 \ ..FII'' *�� •�1�'�. ;' yr' Y r MOW to-1 oil '10 ou Now , i r R , r � t alit S �• te�l,n�rt in 13uYildilirng br�►ttirul hs�r t�,t �.t�� 1 • Il,0 ti 000, 40 To .5 5 ` rPJ777 i 5�'i�f d i ,r5 i"• 1 � i 1 "rr 1 I YMoab • huntington boach deportment of community development MwAf f flw:rr�a E P 0 R I -r�.—s�Yw.�.�.1ii.Yllwl i To Planning Commission FROM: Camqunity Development � DATE : Qh,,tober 16 . 1985 SUSnCT: 01AVT SUPPLR WNTAL zNvznowasa&L IMPACT REPORT NO . 88-1 AM) ENVIROMMNTAL IMPACT REPORT 1Q0. 9 6-•1l FOR TV," PROPOSED SPRINMELD OIL RECCVERX PROJECT ( IN CONJUVCTIOR WITH ZONE r:HANGj9 190. 88-11 AND USE PERMIT IR . 88-.25) Aia=: Angus Petroleum 5772 eolso ;%venue, Suite 210 J Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Review and take action un Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 88-1 and Environmental Impact Report No. 86•-1 (Certified in September 'k, 06) 1 Adapt and certify as adequate Draft. Sixpplametrr.}al Envirommntal lnq�act Report No. 88-1 (UHE11t 88-1) and adopt and recertify 'Envirormental Xmpect Report tic. 86-•1 (SIR 86-1) adopting attached Planning Comission Resolution No. 1407 with Statement of Overriding Considerations . 2A__.MQMRO= YRIr'O UBRIV 88-1 waa prepared to augment the analysis of the proposod 5pr1A'n9field Coil 'Recovery project undertaken in E:IR 86-1 . 4 HIM 66,-1 wds published and certified so a Final' SIR by the I`lanning f4' mLierlha• fn B*pteWmr 1995. Subsequent to that certification of Anal R11t 86-1 anll approval of gone Change No . 65-4 ind Use permit , I lio. 86-7 by the City Council 4n October 20, 1986, litigation brought agaicast ' the City and .ANGUS petroleum Corporation (As Real Patty in � Interest) br the Concerned r4 tisens of Huntington Beach, Inc, was settled by 8d agr"Ant 6eted, 3by g , 1988. As part of the fttt'i rnt' AgreeftWt., the City Cou;ncil 'it mote of October 20, 198ti by whieb final RIR 86-1 wal certifiod, woo not aside. 1968* now Project applications were-filed with tho ;City. So *opliantious are for Stone Change lWo. 68-11 and Use Permit no. �A`• yf TL 71 RiI '�1C. �+°r�•' �s A rt�Su•.r'.��k'�.'I+:Lr.,rLa�',`.r- :,a-. 1 1 I ,y p�' I• 11J 7I {.jjl �...� r I DSEIR 88-1 and EIR C6-1, once certified and recertified re opcictivaiy, a int:erj0ed to be utilized for the afor.Pment: i.one3 6iscretionaiv Er ions . Following neu project applications being tiled with the City in May, 19880 the department of Community Davelopcment de::er•minecl that a Supplement to the existing EIR (EIR 86--1) should be prepared and ccirculatetel in accordance with CEQA requirements . The: City serves me the Lead Agency for the CEQA review process as it ei.d for the review process for EIR 86-1 . A supplemen' -to an SIR may bit prepared when "only m;.nor additions or changes would be necessary to make the previous EIR adequately apply to the project in the changed situation. " (Guidelines 15163 (a) (2) ) • A supplement may be circulated by itself , without recirculafi.ng the previous ETR . (Id . at Section 15163 (d) ) . In order to fissure the fullest review by both Responsible Agencies and the public:, however , the City recirculated bcth the Supplement and previous EIR 86-1 . In accor(Rance witit the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) , j DESIR 88-1 and FIR 86-1 has gone through tha following public f, notification and review process : I I . Notice of Preparation posted, advertised and circulated June 1, -�• a . Notice of Completion of DSEIR 88-1 and EIR 86-1 posted, aidvortised, and circulated August 23 , 1988 . s" 3 . DSEIR 88-1 a,:d EIR 86-1 are available Fox public review and comment August 23 , 1988 - October 7, 1988 . 4 . Copies of DSEIR 88-1 and 3IR 86-1 forwarded to Planning . Comaission and City Coui *.Al members August 29, MS. 5 . Initial Cowwnta on DBEIR 88--1 and EIR 86-1 forwarded to Planning commissian at Study Session for Angus Project on r October 41 1938 . f ` D86IR 88-1 4katad S1R 88-1 identify neveral impacts from the proposed psojt wbich. can be mitigated to a level of insignificance through the mitigation matures included in this staff report . Both Xlbs identified three significant adverse impacts which could not be a►i'tigated to art insignificant level . A brief discussion of these impacts follows: Staff Report 10/18r88 -2- ( 1455d) 1 ?`i.iak-.Qf- t _File Risks associated with the project ; nclude release or ignition of flammable, liquids sf.ored an site, coil spills, impacts f, roir, hazardous chemicals , And gas leaks . All risk can be mitigated to an insignificant level except the chance that a fire: could rer tali. in radiant heat affecting the area surrounding the project . The LZR quantifies the risk of radiant heat from an oil tank fire as " rare" or as 1 : 10, p00 to 1 : 1 , 000 . 000 chance of hrpppening in one year . This risk was calculated using a worst case scen: i-•i.o with no perimeter well and no mitigation measures . The radiant h3aL hazard footprint, will be significantly reduced by lowering facilit:iea to 6 ' below grade, building an 8 ' perimeter wall and keepiny on-site storage of oil at a minimum level . Although the possibility of a fire will be reduced to a very rare statistical level it can not be totally eliminated so is being listed as a significant unavoidable adverse itzkoact . It should be noted , however , that the risk of upsat associated with the proposed project is less than that associated with the existing oil facilities around the project area which will be eliminated as part of the proposed project . ,aunt Irnsact t No significant unavoidable adverse impacts are anticipated with regard to topography, soils . or geology except in the event of an earthquake of 8. 0 magnitude or greater in the area . All the mitigation measures proposed will minimize the risks of an event of this magnitude however adverse impacts the surrounding area can not be overlooked . heathetically, the project itself will he an improvement to the neighborhood over existing conditions , However, some aspects of the j construction phase and maintenance will create unsightly nuisances . i Although mitigated with an 8 ' perimeter well and mature landscaping , 165' rigs will be clearly visible directly adjacent to residences for � up to two years . Also impacting the surrounding neighborhood will be a temporary 30 ' high sound barrier at the property, line . Tanker will be visible above, the perimeter wall and landscaping on the faci7 ,ties site. 'these views can not be eliminated . impacts from light and glare will be mitigated to an insignificant level . No flood lighting will be used . All lights will be low profile and directed to equipment areas only. Less light will be visible than from a residential project. The following are areas of general concern where impacts have been noted but have been reduced to insignificant levels through mitigation measures. Alternatives to the proposed project are discussed as well . I St*ff itoport - 10/18/88 -3- (1455d) 1 1 There is a potential for oil spills from the pipes , valves , fittings , tanks and equipment . To adequately mitigate this , all new matr;rial.s will be used and protected against corrosion. The drill site and the faci1itiea site will be designed in such a way to provide S:otal containment of all fluids in the event of a spill . Any surface water from a rainstorm comi-ig in contact with a spill will be diverted to catch basins and f i itered for reinspe3ction. Wk gf Moser - tjAXdouac Chemicala The only chemicals to be used are those normally used in oil operations and none would be used in large quantities . If a spill should occur, it would be contained in the area and no impact would occur outside the project area . Rink of 11pset a$ Leeks Althovrgh there is a change that gas leaks could occur at old abandonments upon repre3ssurisation of the resevoir , diligent monitoring should preclude the risk. The project will actually lessen the possibility of gas leaks by providing open produciny wells which serve as low pressure areas for the release of gas . A contingency plan has been filed with the Huntington Reach Fire Department which will be tmplmwnted should any leaks occur. TxWlc and Circulation During the drilling phase, there will be an increase in traffic � impacts around the project area . An average of 3 heavy vehicle trips are anticipated over the period . Iwpacts will be heaviest during the nine month construction phase. During the production/injection phase there will not be project-related i nc4eases in traffic in the neighborhood . To mitigate traffic impacts to an insignificant level truck traffic will be resteir-ted to the hours of 7 : 00 AN to 5 : 00 PM seven days per week during the drilling phase and six days per week during the construction phase. Noise from t),e proposed project , particu�atly during the drilling phase, is of prince concern to the City and residents who live near the ` site . A noise study was conducted as part of the DSEIR 88-1 ard LIR 86-•1 and it discusses at length the existing noise environment and the projected noise impacts resulting from the proposed ail recovery � i�ro� t• Staff Report - 10/18/88 -4- I Existing noise levels in the Area ar.,) a result of traffic. or nearby roadways and the existing oil production operations . Currently there are 40 wells scattered throughout ha project area . Each of these wells constitute a minor sour:a of noise impacting its immediate surrounding . With the project these wells will be consolidat.id onto the two protect sites . The final result is that through much of the project area , the noise levels will be lower . in Lhe immediate vicinity of the project sites , the noise levels will increase but with proper mitigation measures inc:orpornted into the project design, the resul,ting noise levels wf.11 still be within the Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance . No significant noise impacts are anticipated to result from the proposed project. The site plan for the project shoes that the distance from the drilling rigs _' o the nearest residences will be approximately 105 feet . The worse case noise levels at these residences for each type of drilling rig are given in Table 1 . Tables 2 and 3 show the City ' s Noise Crdinancs St&ndards for comparison with projected drilling noise levels. i The data in Table 1 show that in order for the drilling operation to satisfy the Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance outdoor standards electric motors -with acoustic blankets must be used . The proposel project will use only electric motors with acoustic blankets . j Acoustic blankets - as well as the proposed S-foot: masonry gall along the site perimeter are predicted to reduce the noise leveler to below the Noise Ordinance limits . There are currently a number of pumps operating at the site, and thq project will increase their number. The projects culler for installing submerged pumps for ail wells , however . With the submerged pumps , noise from oil pumping should decrease . occasionally wells will need to be pulled, serviced and repaired . Due to proximity of the nearest r.:sxdences to the wells , the Oil Code requiems thet for any red:,illing performed at might, soundproofing will be pro-Aded . The Oil Code prohibits the pulling of wells during the night'`ime hours ( 1.0 p .m. to 9 a .m. ) . Along with the mitigation measures provided in the DSETk and Eid, the app:#caut has agreed to a noise monitoring program to ensure compliance with the City 's poise Ordinance. This measure should be included by the Planning commission as an additional mitigation measure for the project . i Noise monitoring shall be conducted and,3r the supervision of an acoulti;cal, Ongineer certified by the Countr of Orange,. deports s'.a:.1 to submitted to the Director of Community Development within three working days after completion of each phase of the monitoring effort . The monitoring shall Include the following: $t ote Report -f 10/2e/88 =S- TABLE 1 lRainteaanc:e Drilling Operation 1V015e :_eve1F at the Nearest Residences Noisa Level IMpse e� Ibtor �.6is as Ih ".miss Feur�L+i. Di feel 70,0 dBA 73.0 dBA 74.8 d91A 76.0 dBA Diesel, with acoustic blanket 54.0 MIA 57.0 dBA 58.8 d6A 60.0 dBA f Electric. with atauttic blanket 33.5 d8A 36.5 dU 38.3 d8A 35.5 dBA I TABLE Huntington Beach Outdoor Noise Ordinance Standards Noise Level Not Maximum Allowable tgL_k-_R Exceeded_, pu r!�t i Can o� .E:. 'ed&QQ ':pX #m E.tan ds e7:60 ,m. to_..ia : oa Zo 55 dBA 30 minutes/hour 60 dBA '5 minutes/hour a3 dBA 5 minutes/hour 70 dBA 1 minute/hour 75 3BA For any period of time Nighttime ( 1 : 00 B .m- t!2_7 ; 90 p.m. ). 50 dBA 30 minutes/hour 55 dBA 15 minutes/hour 60 d8A 5 minutes/hour 65 dBA 1 minute/hour a 70 dBA For any period of time TABLE 3 Huntington Beach Indoor Noise Ordinance Standmrds Noise Level Not Maximum Allowable to.-h&. iceeded duty ion of Exceft Rnce 55 dam► 5 minutes/hour 60 dBA 1 minute/hour 68 d8A For any period of time W,nhW= Rom- to 7.: 0. M.1 45 deg► 5 minutes/hour 50 49A 1 minute/hour 55 deA For any period of time staff Report - 10/18/88 -6- ( 1455d) a . Rrfk-!dr L,Monitorina . Prior to the atart of the drilling phase, noise measurements shall be obtained during the ' operation of the specific drilling rig which has been selected and the measurements shall be related to those which will be experienced at the nearest residential boundaries to the drilling site . In addition, the noise control measures which have been (or will be) applied to the rig as needod for compliance with the City of Huntington Beach Noise ordinance shall be identified . b. start of Drilling . Noise measurements shall be obtained during the nighttime hours ( 10 p.m. to 7 : 00 a .m. ) for at least six hours on each of three nights within the five db f period from the start of the drilling phase . Monitoring is to occ::r at the nearest residential boundary to the actual dr.'. 11in.g operation. { The noise :level data shall be compared to those specified in the City of Huntington Beach Noise ordinance. Where an exceedence ' of the Ordinance is idontified, noise control measures shall be app'AJed and an addit,lonal two nights of monitoring shall be required . ce Duriea .thg- .D&JJJi;1g Phase. Noise monitoring shall occur during a six--hour peLiod between the hours from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. at leant one each month during the Drilling Phase of the project . The nolme level data obtained shall be compared to the City of Huntir,. j,r,n Beach poise Ordinance standards . Whete an exceedence of the . -andard+s is iL'.antified, noise control measures shall be � applies ;nd an additional two nights of monitoring shall be required. A TnitN TTlyss s As required by Section 15126(d) of the C:ZQA guidelines , alternatives ..o the proposed project are discussed in both Elk 86-1 and DSEIR 88-1. DGEIR 88 -1 evaluates ten alternatives to the proposed project . In addition to the Ono project' alternctive, two revisions to the proposed project are evaluated ( *Reduced Intens' t y Alternative, and *More Intense Drilling Program") . Four alternative sites are examined; the evaluation of one of these alternative sites examines two poteptial configurations. The overall abandonment of oil, production is evaluated, as IS the development of a medic.m-density rresidentlal project on the project site. C3QA requires that at least one alternative be identified as "environmentally superior" to the proponed project; the DStEIR coacludes that the overall abandonment of oil prodvcti.on is "the environmentally superior" alter,nativt to the proposed project, but that this alternative does not appear to be "feasible" . 84W, Report - 10/1.8/ad -7- ( 1+0 5Bd) I DSEIR 88- 1 and EIR 86-1 adequately analyze the potential environmental � impacts of the proposed project . Therefore, staff -ecomrnends that the Planning Commission approvoi and car';ify the doci;ment . Resolution 1407 (Attachment No. 6) is pro0.ded cor certification . APPROM& Qf THE J!RQPO6ED pit=T: CEQA Saction 15091 requires that prior to a public agency approving or carrying out a project for which an EIR has been completed and identifies one or more significant environmental impacts, the public agency must make one or more written findings for eac:t' of those significant effects . In addition, CEQA rcluires that findngs must be supported by substantial evidence. Finding-a and fpcts in support of findings regarding the significant effects identified in DSEIR 88-1 and EIR 86-1 are listed in detail. in Attachment 4 of this staff report . In addition, CEQA requires that when a project has been identified as having significant impacts which cannot be reduced to a level of insignificance through mitigation measures , a statement of overriding considerations must be made. In this statement , the Planning Commission and City Council must find that the economic and social benefits of the proposed project outweigh the project ' s potentially adverse impacts. A st,atement of overriding consideration is found in Attachment No. 8 of this staff report . rn that statement, staff ' s for determining that the remaining effects of the adverse impacts are "acceptable" , given off-setting project benefits , in -discussed . 4 . Q RZCD=N ATIQH •. Staff reco=aends that the planning Commission adopt and certify es adequate DBEIR 88-1 and EIR 86-1 by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1407 with Statement of Overriding Considerations . and forward DSEIR 88-X and SIR 86-1 to the City Council for their adoption and certification with the following findings and conditions of approval (mitigation o eeaures) . FI rna Ja ►gRPR - DSEIR- AIL-1- AND i. D$NIR 88-1 and SiA 86-1 have been completed 3n compliance with the California Uvirornfental Quality Act as emended dune 1986, and all stage and local quidelines therefore . 2. IDBBIR 88-1 and NIR 86-1 adequately addresses the potential environmental impacts that may be associated with the Sprim9field Oil Recovery project •nd is found to be certifiable. 1 . The economic and social benefits of the proposed Waterfront project outweigh the project 's unavoidable adverse seismic, enem, aesthetic/view and cumulative air quality impacts . Stiff Report 10/18/08 -8- ( 1455d) 1 rwM. M�x1 �CYCDH hIAB���B 13 s� �! T; �1, tD 1 . The site plan, elevations and lanOscape plan dated received October 13 , 1988, shall be the, conceptually approved layout . a . This use permit shall not become offective u'Ytil 2on+e Change No . 88-11 has been approved anC in effect . Z . All structures and procedures shall conform to Title 15 of Llie Huntington Beach MUni.ci.pal Code and the Division of oil. and Gas Standards . 3 . The applicant shall obtain all necessary electrical and building permits. 4 . Noise monitorin g shall be conducted under the supervision of an acoustical engineer certified by the County of Orange . Reports shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development within three working days after the completion of each phase of the monitoring effect . The monitoring shall include the f6liowing : a. M fling phase mo. itarins . Prior to the start of the drilling phase, noise metsuremants shall be obtained during the alperution of the specific drilling rig which has been selected and the measurements shall be related to those which will be experienced at the nearest residential boundaries to the drilling site . in addition, the noise control measures have been (or will bye) applied to the rig as needed for compliance with the City of Huntington beach Noise ordinance shall be identified. b. St_, „s,l DrJ11jhq. poise measurements shall be obtained during ' ,c� nighttime hours ( 10 : 00 P�! to 7 : 00 AN) for at least six hours on each of three nights within the five day period from the start of the drilling phase. Monitoring is to occur at the nearest residential boundary to the actual dt.1111hq operation. . The noise level date shall be compared to those specified ih4lio City of Huntington beach noise Ordinance by the bepartamt of Cormerxnilty, Development. Where an e:oeedancs dt' tbe ordihance is identified # noise control masurss shall be applied agd an additional two nights of monitoring shad be required . r ANY'. + (14556) 1 l71C:r:T�+cyM1.r�Mtl��/ .d'P. ..L.,i.i ..:a1."I' 1'': _ _ _. _ __ _ .1` .. .. -. __'__. ,.Ib ,.. _ ., .. �.,..:.,'L-• 1 f i ti I i c' • Ru it�g thfi_P_rJtJJ _Jj1"a• Noise monitoring shall occur during a Six.-hour pariud between the hours from 1p : DA PM to 7 : 00 .AM at least once each month during the drf llIng phase of the project . The :noise level data obtained shall be cGmpared to tho City of Huntington HeE-ch Hoiae Ordinance standards by the Department of Community Development . Where 8,n exceedance of the standards is identified, noi_ 5e control maRaures shall be applied and an additional two nights of monitoring stall be reguiyred . 5. Pleasures to reduce erosion should be used during grading ind site preparation • Grading and Construction activity shall take place only during daylight hours afttar the issuance of a grading permit by the Departmezi� of Pi,jbliv. Works . 6 . During grading and excavation, ©arthmovi.ng crews should observe cuts and spoils for potential archaeological finds. In the evert: of a potential, find being loo.ited, operations sha'a.l be suspended until the significance of the find is determined . 7 . A dust control program shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits . S . All street improveme,3ts for b9th tracts ahaall be constructed after the heA11 or� operations have bean completed (approximately 4 weeks) : a . Final grarding# or any other on-site construction ►shall be prohibited until street, improvement construction has commenced . b. prior to any on-Aits construction or drilling, the ma3onry wall and all landscaping and street improvements shall be installed subject to the approval of Department of Community Development and Department of public Works . 9 . Prior to the installut:ion of any landscaping# a landscape and irrigaxiion plan shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development and public Works for review and approval . a. A14 landscaping shall comply with Chapter 15 . 22 of the ituntington Beach Ordinance Code . and all trees shall be minim = 24 Inch box type and spaced no greater than 24 feet on center. . J. Prior to the installation of the ;office 'structure,, elevations shall be provided for review and approval by the 'Department of C*nraunity ftvelopment . w' F„ A . The office shall be on a permanent foundation. b. A-_"nsard or pitched Noof shall be provided . t11f f Roport imeles -lg- ( ia 55d) 1 , 1 - . . t 11 , 11,her applicant shell enter into a f r3,:chiilb agreement with t*ae >� City Z-o:; r the i.n,stal. larion of the underground connection between the two biocks , if roqui. red . 12 , Tho proper sealing and ahandorimf..-.nt ot: the exl5ti.ng scat crud wells which will ba replaced by this project shall take place following approval of this project and must be compl tad within eighteen ( la) months 13 . The surface of the site shall be completely covered with an appropriate Material (such as gravel and/car asphalt) subject to review and approval of Public Works Department:, Fire Department and Department of Community Development . ail . A report prepared by an acoustical engineer certified by the County of Orange shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development for review and approval pri:,;: to commencing drilling . Said report shell describe noise levels at the Angus Cif Site property line and at the nearest residential property line both with and without an acoustical blanket on the drilling rig and service rigs . They report shall indicate noise attenuation measures necessary to ensure compliance with the Huntington Beach Boise Code. This shall include the provisions of the Ordinance Code regarding maximum hourly average noise level at nearest residential property line of 50 dB(A) during nighttime hours between 10 : 00 PM and 7: 00 AN. a . A double acoustical blanket enclosure: shall ba provided at ' man-door entrances . 15. poise attenuation for the drilling operation, oil operation and service operation shall be provided pursuant to the Oil Code and nine report epecified, 'in Condition 14 . a . If a noise violation occurs , the entire drilling structure shall be wrapped with an acoustical blanket for grenter noises attenuation. i 16. The protect shall fully comply with the Huntington Beach raise OrdinanCe►. At the applicant ' s expense, a continuous calibrated meter shall be on site to monitor the decibel (dBA) level with a prIftted copy to be made available to City staff and Ad Hoc lhdeaft Projbct 0t: -ear Comaittoe an a Wmakly basis. I 1?. Ito speakers, loud bells or buzzers shall be employees on site , 18'. fCicamelve vibrationp as determinesd by the Department of Community II vBlopftnt, shall be reduced to acceptable levels . 18 . Ught. and ylete Uhall he directed and/or screened to prevent 001fillag�w Ltd SdjMcdht r;14ideetial propertlos and shall be e"r *Ef1dl+sht sUbiedt to the requirments of the Building '� ' �ir38 Oft• b . 209,9 Report (1455d) i 1 1� I I 1 r 1 20 , .11 heavy truck traffic Rhall be limited to the following strobits between the 405 f ree;aAy soa the subjer:t :i to : Eaech BoUleJard, Adams Avenue , and nelariare, Streil!t . For Untranc o to � the site only Spr'.ngfic.ld Avenue and California Street may be used . 1 . Heavy truck traffic sha:li be limited to the hours between 7 : 00 AM and 5 : 00 PM. a . No trucks may park on the street . b. T.:uck deliveries shall be stagge ed ao thait. no 4tackiag shall occur on public streets . 22 . All employees crust park on either one of the two sites . Street parking for employees is prohibited. . 23 . Local streets affected by truck traffic shall be inspected before and after cc,is truction. hny damage to local streets by heavy trucks shall be repaired and reconstructed per City requirements at the expense of the applicant. 24 . All driveways shall be radius type and constructed to Public Works standards. 25 . There shell be no entrance or exit of vehicles from the drilling site between the hours of 10 : 00 PM and 7 : 00 AM except for emmerguncy purposes . 26 . An overload permit should be cbtained from City and Stage ( if required) for all oversized loads to be moved on public streets . 27. Pipe string cementing through fresh water bearing sands shr11.1 be implqwnted to prevent salt water intrusion into the aquifers . 28 . A system for collecting , treating, and relaasing stor.rn drainage skull be providod by the applicant- and approved by Public Works ., 28. Brine wags stall not be releasod Into the sewer system. 30 , A rec elin+Q plan of produced zone water back to the. oil, reservoir shall be certified by the bapsrunt of Oil and Gas and the Fire Department and all its conditions and restrictions wall be adhered to. 31. Ift1l' se rvice ride shall be cperr!ted no more then a total of 48 ds ■ par year between 7 , 00 An and 7: 00 PM or daylight hours, whrchaver is shorter. 32, No mote then four w*11 service„ rigs may be on the pi arises at halone tom. The service shall not txeeed 130 feet in ght and shall be double waffled and utilize acoustical blankets as deemd nacesea=y. . V staff Report M 10l1C. 08 (1455d) 1 r 33 . All drilling rigs and prceu:-t :ion cells shit l l be of-:ay. et•.ed ty electrical motors anti c4ectric pumps only , 34 . The 24-- hour phase dr'i. 11inr; rigs shall not operate for :-#ny longer than : Years fron) i:hF.- issuance of the flrrF t: o1ri j l ing permit . 35 . Or * fling rigs for regaining wellbi after. the two ye&r pe�ri.od shall comply with the conditions . Subsequent drilling shall be: l.imZted to 7:00 AY, to 10 . 00 P14 only . 36 . Drilling derricks shall not exceed 165 foot in overall hedy. ht . 37. Upon completion of. 34 hours phase of injection and producer hells , 811 drilling rigs shall he removed from the eiLa. 38 . Service rigs shall. be erected only during maintenanc.e operations . 39 . Applicant shall install blowout prevantion equipment . 40. A full vapor recovery system shall be isial-alled as required by the South Coast Air Quality Hsnegeimnt District . � 41. Only three on-site crude oil tanks are F ermi t ted and shall never be completely full at once . 42. Prepare and submit a Preliminary Zmerg:�ncy Action plan (LAP) prior to issuance of bui�ding permits. A completed Emergency Action Plan based on as-built plans shall he completed and j submitted prior to the start of oil production operations . The EtrgenCy Action plan shall include employee training and periodic practice, how spillage onto street from si,ta(e) would be handled (stockpile of sand, etc. ) , the safa handling of any chemicals and/or materials, and full knowledge of all systems and eerwrganey equfWnrit. A copy shall "+e on file with the Fire Do p a�rtment and u;dated on a five yja= basis . In addition, a Spill Prevention and Control lad Countermeasure (SPCC% Plan its � compliance with City reclui�:eaents for handling of spills, etc . , not csthetwise covered In the Wwrgency Action Man shall be aarwpleted to6- filed with the City prior to the start of oil productt operations , 43. All ail must be transported by pipeline. . 44. Are on-site fire suppression system shall be instarl.1e6 as a primary rouges fot find protection purivant to fire Department raqu row I i i Stiff ltepolt "' 10/11//88 -13_ �j 45 . Cellar requirements for o: l wells : a , A tiydroge�, sulfide detecti r)n &ye,em for the %gell- shall be, inst,ri. led 3,,ibject: to FAre D.!p rtmRi. 3: ' :{,) b. Fi re c i.ngwishers aippr<iyed by the Fire Department: be, inst.dllad within 7S f�iet: Of on-site . c . Provide metal ope;i grate rovers over top of wellce;�1o�.•r. . 4b • Storsge tank requi remeratrs a . Must have ere--p ,.,imbeei foam injection .syst:etn installed on all prc3uw iw storage tanks . h. Itust have exterior deluge water spray systain on all storage ranks . 47 . Site regiiirraments a. All diked areas moat Y.ave an en+5inaered drainage :system. b. Foam storage a--ef: and foam quantity to be approved br Fire Department . , C. Fire hydrants to be located in areas approved by Fire Department . d. hydrogen sul ti4e datection systdn: approved by Fare foopewtment to be instal.l:ad on y reject peri.m-ptter .. e. Fire ext_ ng l shers approved by the Vitre l%epartmvn?; ii:ist be installed throughout the sits. E. AX1 gate openings must be 24 teat Lq width and installation moat comply with Fire Department Specification 403 . 48 . Well cel � pie l ars �ssha�ll tr*` ryna imteined� f.`n+ .. c'1een and eff icient r4annsr l: 48 . Twenty-oae (21; abanOAcned eve.'. 'i �s ha:e been idantif iecl within the ' projftt- aar2a which fo not meet present day abandotmnt sa to '. ;met�tma A Cur t inge►ncy plan shall be outlined and submf tted tc, the Huntington Beach Vita Departmtaen l- for review and approval, with steps to be taken :�n the errant. that leakerle kvcm any of theme. 'abazndaneb wells f irr.da its way to the turfacf . 50 . Pri•eir to terml:sat: on of the oil aperat:on, a plan she l-:: be. submitted pubeat to treviefm and appx,rivrl 4f the Fire .���artrneat sad �'omtan►n�`'.� Lewcalop�rit �p�+rtm�tf�t# showing haw the site j 04ail be abandoned and restored to its Closest nattursi state. i 9t::ft Hepnrt l.b/18/88 1 i Therti he nr, p.ipplirlt- octivity outside th," I I 1 7 : 00 AM Vnd 8 : 00 YM, Moyidi4y foi 1:hit, pro-) t �(:t. be C �1 i W1 i t i-J C' L i I'I T1 s h a ) .1 be s It it ( 1 .4t: all. tiil.e.r, during thr.. term of this use :41'.6 on. l u o,: eTtension thereof , inaintai n in Ecrcf- oir po icil :.; i (aillring the operg. t.0r , and as i i ID a :-h :,, C.' :y- of flu:,tinqton Beach , the City t:l-,ei �!uf , as':d every of Eicer arid emplo- ee 0 � i:Oe �It- P U. (Ile M. ( L d C C I il Like d U Ut C 0 11 1.-N e, 0 t hi u em I y r h i r, of tidal ea�acity, aq;i ! nst li abi lity or- f i* iiallcial loss inns brought by any reSL1.1t:iVCJ f r oir any sti i la J,ni.s e)Y- i.Ct:A person or Per— pr! -n,ii all costs and expenses of again"' lie. in the arr.ouat of not: I 'L-Jaan $5 , 000 , 0010 cr.')mbJLn-,. i .Iinglo linit for any injury to j)er7ons or damaq(--i to prope,. ty, including ' but not limited to) nj i-,ry or damage fr.-CM 3L1b.Si.C-jnc#A and rebound , r5SUlting Fr' on the Opet8tWS Oil drilling and producl--ion activities and operations inc-Ain-ital theieto . Said pollcie.s 5hd.1.1 provide that the insurance. cove...-a- 9.z. -,,hall riot be cancel1c.'.0 03: reduced by the insurin,-,-e cal-riec without the City ha-.-;:Lng been given i.t 1riazzi-t; ten iayb prior written notice thereof 137 cuch carrier . ' he operator slial ). riot cancel or reduce said insurance coverage . At all. times during the term of this use permit , and any renewAl or axi.ension thereof , the operator shall maintain on file with the City Clerk a c-ertificate or cert;_ficates of insurance issued by the carrier or r!arriers showiny that said insurance is in (affect: in the amount: required above , and z Copy of each insuran(,.a policy , If the operator does noL kimep saj.0 insurarce in- iul. ' force and effect , the City may obtain said insurance and pay '.:hc premium thereon , which shall Lhen be deem.td a debt owned by the operator to the City. Any insurance policies procured by the operator, hereunder shall provide. that the insurance carrier wAives all. rights of subrogation agairiz;t LAhe City . If the City cbtains any policy uf insurance hereunder , such policy shaii include a waiver by the insurance cairieT of all rights of subrogation against the operator . 54 , The Plaoi,ing Commission shall review and , if necessary, may modify the conditions :1.3 set forth in this use permit , at tte. first regular Planning Commission meeting in October , 1,989 , and at five year intervals thereafter , and upon any change in ownership of the project which occurs between five-y.:.,ar reviews ; provided that the phrase "change of ownership" 8S useO herein shall not include any sale or other transfer to a corporation, pa:ctnership or other form of business organization, in which Alberta Natural Gas-United States andf'or one or more ihareholders or subsidiaries owns the controlling interests, or any stile or transfer so long as Angus or one of its subsidiaries retains responsibility for the operation of the project . '15- ( 1455d) Staff x2port - 10/18/88 i 55 . ne Planning Cointeinsi.on reserves the right to revoke this use pormit If any .ri0lot. ion of these conditions or the Huot.ington Beach Crdina+nce Code occurs . The City shall provider the property owner wILh notice An writing of any violati.-M , -zt:ating the City ' s basis for determining that a violation has occvrred . The pxcpert;y ownec shall he,,,Pe ai reasonable time to (.urk., the, vi.ul.at:iov. before further act: icn ire taken . 'i'he :i :y may requ .ive, the property owner with noticse in writing UP submit: written Auc:ument:at,ion !.,,f actions taken to remc.kiy any viol.at>lctin and may regAttire monitoring or rather procedures to be -i !�,plemented in order to ensure: that the viol atioa will he r:urocl , 56 , The nine: member project: ieview committee shall monitor the lrn J g ea,lo t n1h ly thereafter . 'A"he Fire r)eipaxtment: arid Community Oevnl*pment: departments shall -' o int l..y provide a staff liaison . 57 , .'he propexty, value protection plan submitted by the applicant shall by impl(sment:a:i as outlined prior to drilling . 56 . In the event: that E. t'.her ott� of the two blocks is to be wiLhout: � 24--hour supervision , a -rideo camera shall be employed on-site to provide r4ntlnuous sux-vei ll.ance which can be monitored by , r. sonr►o,.X at the otber 1. . Errata Sheet 2 Co-,anent IF-tters on Draft :;uppler mental rJIR N+,., . 88•- 1 and H.:R No. 86- i 3 . City responses Ito comm,--ants on Draft; Supp:lcmental EIR No . 88-1. and E-TH No . 86-1. 4 , IFindi ngs and Facts in Sl pport of Findings Regarding the Environmental. Impact Report for AtiRtis Oil Petroleum Corporation 5 . Staternen:, of Overriding Considerations G . 11"n ►llation No . 1407 i J Staff Report - 10/18i88 -16- ( 1455d) i to r ` If f 1ti77ACfDW,.N ' 1 ERRI'.TA SHEET 1 •� Mtl� it •. .M! . - ,..•war 9 1 � R r � � y r r' .y R I ERRATA TO DRAFT rtPPLOWNTAL E14V I ROMW,14TAL :cam:"AM kZMUT E . Page 23 f9ectt.ci1 :2 . 3 . 3 Change "CUP" to "'UPO Pa()0!.4 25 Set-1 *ari 3 . 4. . 5 . 1 (.hange "CUP" t;r, "UP" Page 6 section 3 . 6 . 2 . 6 . 2 r!hange "CUP" Lo " N" pa.,le 27 I'Secorld line Chang,.) "CUP" to "UP" Page 27 Vast lino Delete "nine" , Arid "of t:lie" . Pare 28 at C- ZJ=109 Change reference to "CUF" to "UP" Page 32 Section on Change `' 55 feet" to "50 feet" + i i Jt M t-k A • � I' n 1 J r' S 47, Ir , A7TACKKENT 2 COMWI'T LETTERS ON DRAFT SEIR NO . 08,-1 AND EIR NO . 66-1 I I lr h 1 f CONCERNED CITIVEIRS FOR HUNTINGTON BEACH So. • _ , ' ►_i ( ; liwitir-. ton Aeauh# CA 92648 DEPART='" Or CM1,:iVl1ITY rjENEIC?pMF T ATT1 (1AMANINN 04RARA War No O 'Harai RE: UUPr 3)UFF1.Z7MT WACT UPORT NO. 86-1 AUGUST, i In responso to the ASGUS 8311 jumt received, to would IiIs .to .brims ycmr attention tc the folloe►U4 CONCUMED CITIZIDIS s,cumentas DUST COMM At CONOMUM CI1MIS roqufiat, Via COUNTY AIR QUA 2TY BOARD come to aseauxi than dust at prc)3ect si.ta. They ,-eparted by t«elisphanol, that ttis wind factor was only 0milee pior hour on that partictuUm 4M. The dust hlorfiAg was coming from the tumv Met gtree;ts surroundiog 1Ae tma projeec-g sites and an we went into the dryer mor.-th of July the dust factor Vauld set � worse . A varni.r�z war sent to ANOU99 but no fine could hQ m4er an Vot dzte. j We were a4y1sed to cn11 again when they wind facwr *am over 15 teiies per hour &nd an..ther measurement will be made CONO � TXD CITIZF21 i ae-relr obsurved any water 4sing peat on the quite L igh mounds of dirt to oon tra?. tit ducat. We were subjected to ij*.ealthy layers of duot in our atxaoapher* end hotnees betuiveon. 0010BM 17 1987 d,:d ME 11 1988 due to the S asi ta ArA 1f nd c and i tiorsa 1 ftich will be waou upon tie again. A6 W 1(4) HEAVY Tgua TR FTIC Accord tM to 9"ETR, M-•1 A, a q ,turning radius is ase�dod for a asoi tractor-trailer . Delaware Rtra+a s ..6Q [a wide with onembalf aa17 paved+ %=U4 south on Delaware off $prirk33iiid'Aymno at atl #rilli ' sit~ will be risky for sahnzl children ad their bur to be set r #sr truck tunina path to the entry xwe of the drill wi.t&. oa Volaware g1 "t, The opponi to eatralme is on California atr**%. 0"i.tarnia At * ip f� a wide mW only halt psw4 on resi.dentisl aids. CONC :IM CITIZIMO are he-wing 111f icul ties la balljyj • that the project will haves only- two tx aks (,Wham also?) 'per 00MUK to the pre jeer,t site during drilling phaiss and no additioml tarw k lathe durigg the production phase. Very truly $,jury t% 7W. CITISM M K I Way N• 1PAX21 te: Mr. westie"tteg � t MAC Gow V/ h Job: * 10r hurdoek . �1J00W OY r IN r •� ,it , Cb, K 'v`r 1,4 4,1&4 C,ir;. 91(A V jk 1` M C.O n c►�� rA 6,, 5. i u ed I 'stir C. . .t,,,�- ' �- •i ti! P�' �. ' #-A 0 c4. e4 r i 9%4.r"t"• i + • 1 . co. aLAO �AG•;.Vl�dim"�' , f I • Gt:,ri.8 Cort'y 1801 CmIiforI) i �l StI-uoI A11l ,r 0 , lraftf) lier,tt. ington' lica : h , C.A I • Msyr,r Robert. Nandi ,_. i L y Cotinc r 1 `it!e,II ;e'r';; C: lTY OF HUNTIN(i"'ON 13F:�+c:tl 2000 Mai n S? trceat i Iltantii)gtcsre Beach , CA 92b48 1)eai.- Mayor Handi e: k count i l `1i_mbt-'rs , A,;, .e ;! t the '11"ok'c' :; I. n t (,d addres My nelghbov,,,; and I -tre vary c:onc:er,)e d about a pco'"icct whit--lr wi i l txe tip for revir!w by the Planning Commission somet in'-le in S,.-pt.ember .. This 17rr jec. ' is be -I ng p►-(-,l ova d by Arru,us Oil Cep . wh i ,;h watltS to drill ."10 60 new oil wells over a pe.t:ind c f L,,;0 ( 2 ) years , Aneus Oil Co . has, 1)urc.ha ed two blocks of land , ill Whir„h there are a pproximat.el.y six homes on presently . 't`Hs pi:o1)oL;ed drill site. is located 1)et:weerr California street ar.d Delaware , Rochester and Springfield s ►- reeyts and is surroundeei by residential Domes on three sid ,: s . The value of the project ,.; in the- range of 425 , 000 , 000. 0D . 1. have;: Keen Watching line: City of Ilitr1iingLori bleach develop and i like what has buon c1)proved , however , there seems tc, be no way Lh.1 t a pro Iel", L c,;, oii s nagni tude cou id he constructed and not. have: all effect. .)n the neighbot•hor.stl . 1 have just re ceretl.y received Lhe Fo nvi r 'mien teal Impact Report and I am concerned about a r few things it1 441cich I would }.?eke yoet t.o v e v i e w anti cor,nequent I , respond to ; A ) Drilling noise for a period of one ( 1 ) to t-wo (2) years u:iing a 1 }000 electric:, motors for, twenty- four ( 74 ) hours a clay . 14i11 you guarantee LIS that this drilling ` upura �. icr, will not be a nuisance?? The MLR report is vo t det.ailcd enough in regards to the effect the noise level wil ) I have, on the surrWinding t:esidence , e;:s;pecial. ly at night . llow about 14miting, the drill irtg pr�rind to day tine hreur only . B Mainte more of the wells . 'Phis will occur after the wells are completed . Lets gay they have 60 wells that need to h,, cleaaned two times a year . This (:)pecatiun takes a►pproxi.trtately two day.,; per well. , which ;:duals 120 clays out of the year a i ul l ing rig will he operating on the site~ ct;eestin , trc>iie , perhaps yott can request that 0ey insulate these pa I i ng rigs evePt, thuttgh the acttial work ocetirs during the diytime hours . What. shout the neighbors that work out of their homes , have daytime hoarders , and the people thot work at night , will this noises create a nuisance in their case? con ;. -- 1 � �Ali .;tr l y 30 , 1986 Mayor Mann ic. City C,ourr•_ i 1 ffernIMF` i Pia gt i'w�, I kt'ocrw lrtr I 1 i ng rig ar i 11 Oxct',"d I.he Ci Ly noise ordi nan(; t� if un- i.nSk, l i-i L : :1 . T'].t�,� :��� re-,;pond On this wi t.h yot.rr views . One crlltion is ,.t) l imi L thd_ Jrn(1ur, t of wells to be duil tad �ahjch in turn wJ. 1 i (11:e I-NI---c LI-c,2 ni:; i n l t!iv rice: . C. De r�ciOltioll 01' Lhc- he!'If2S strrt•orr"lclina_.73tl, indust - i 1 site . t^�uS tt i7ra iriy� ?-r s 1 Tl0( r��wnff I am conc:err, Ea--FT i. f an er,-rgenc.y wa:5 to Occur 4jnd I had to ;3c11.1. Iny hnrrre , haw Would p�-,, c.rrti ;tl b0y'er.'�--, feel JbauL buying a horne Surrounded by dr it l iln►; r .igL; operating 24 hours a (;ay? Woul.:l you buy ,9 ht7r"le across the sLroet frorir a project, like. this !)) Zattatt� I`hi s l nncl i.s Curren 1-.1y zoned as "0" which exr, ss pro'hib! t:s new d i: i. l. 1 i.nv c,T)e ra t icon s . '1'() 1-1 1. 1 a this pro.lec L to pT'pCe�� , C. ity re - zone this area . The zoniog woo; also wrrit: t. r:r1 to protect Lhe r: esidenLial. area from new we i l d 7i 1. 1 i iii; . llnw earl you allow this i- at re, i.dentia.t area trll ich has be-en zoned for res iden t. to l units . What good is irl,; if yotj cilFinge i t all thr. Li.r� LI ? 1t was ini ti.a ) ly 'Lt)rlt;(i "C)" t.ti a l Low Lhe rx i s t i nil; we l 1. s Lo c(Int. i nue puinpi ng wh i (;h i s far i t- s i nc, (o they have 1)een her. e mar,y yn,nri s . E AestheLics . 'file FJR r- eporL our bonies are .10 tU Vi years o t7 My dolma. is c)nly 7 years cy '•_t1 . Will. the block wall. sur. ruundii)g the site blond or semi rratc-h each type of housing Feature? The hornts: along ui li. .7orni.a Street between Rochester and Si)r ngfiel.d have Orick facadias , wil1 this block wall. have brick incorporated into its ' design? The landscaping around the site needs to be well m,, i.nrain(,:d , bund should bR, pus ted Lo i nsui e this . We sugges L tha L you takd� a drive by our homes , and take a look at them F) Set backs . The standlard :;eL luck 1`ot: a .et.idenfi.aL tloclte is T5 feet: Since this is an industrial use , wOr.tl.dn ' t you tend to agree that set backs ,Iinuld be larger thin 15 feet which would r, l low a larger buffer. Zone between the site and the residence . Lt would alsr, decrease the possibilities of accidents . It must. he noted Lhat these rigs stand a Few hundred f'e,� t io the air , .-tnd i. f au :acc:ident oil occur_ , it would effect the residence . G Alternative sites . I would propuse that they drill near the Div t: entc;r � h is a commerical zoned area . Of course , it would cost the oi. l. compa►ty more money to drill from that location , however , at least it would blend in better . t;. ,)ntintivC . . . - 2 - .ftoly -30 19 f t9aYov Ma nd i i t Y CuUTIC i I nage M1 al Le�' VMJ Lll/efl . her 11 a 1. l.y d') r 10 1 i key I.o 1.1 e L 1i r ,!a tonf.-tri by a v ondomin ium project. 1)e i 11 g d e V e I o 1)(2 d V 8 L.e s i d e I I t a I P_'-oJ ec I. t h e p 1,4 11,11 i i,�.,, r.omirt i s s ; on c a Ti s :!u c()nd orfl i 11 i,ums being developed on a site that: a I r wa(.1 y I-.a s holPe S o Ti it; arlo of I We I 'I.ri they must be blinel . A I So I I tiuliuve Cher illLelnsit)o should he I:I?d I e<1 . ''is "i M a 1, ter of F;I c-, t- ; t 11 i 1; 1.1 t'0 i P C t 5 110 k I I d T 10 L e v e n be A 1 11.o w e d i i i a r e s i d e ii L i a I a r(.,;i as a I r e a cl V s L a t(2 c I I ) This EIR report does not lid(J ,-ess the. homeowners concer. ils and is very biased in my opinkoll . Please read ErivironmenLal, Check list forth;) , yoti w-1- 11 note , thc..-,re suru is --i lot of mayt)e ' :i . J ) Please review the Angus Oil Company for fi.nancial status and previ (:ti�-- experience ii) projects of this type . I can ' t understand with Lh(� oil abundance and prices c- f o.4.1 being as 'Pow as they ace , how this project: could be ecorriffli(,-.ally fva.3ible ciuring Lh,_ qe 'Nis peice of property has been around a lonp ti!ri(i and has never been developed by a large of compaive . WHY? 1 -5 t I i i s son, e o n e s pipe d r e am L L the expense of the residont.i.al neighborhood? What happens i f the p r oJ .!c !. d C)es i L F,r Od LIC0 AS a Y,1)e c L e d 7 W i. I I it be .-e- zone(' eigain? I am closing with the- hope:-' that You Wil. 1 look a tb 's Situation from utir point of view a--i home.owners , not FULL- e income Lo the City or Lhe .-_ IlAmitiatian of existine, we in t1iu surrounding are-as , because 2ventually , thesc wells will depLeLe. thernselves . The Angus Oil Compao is cLaiming this Is a unilAzAtion projecL in reality it is a new drilling project. in a residential area which is against the zoiiing ordinance . 'I hope 7 do not sound to arrogant , however , I am kipset at what I have been hearing and seeing in regar(is to this project. , and I do tint believe it is in the best inLerest of the City or cf the surrounding area . I look forweqrri to Your prompt response . Sincerely , CC Hatilline, (-*o111n1i ssioll Staff City Cnuncil Members to 1, Htwflnoon seeihICS= Company a many 712d Mein 4blFW, ''2W, Hunikviort Owl., Californho 92646-2402 17141 ift- tbl I-AX 714.9W 30f.9 c7c;t.ab.:r 5P t�$$ Community Development Department 2000 Main Street. Huntington Beach , 'Ch 92648 A01n: Mu. Kelly Main Springfield oil, fle eove y Project Dear Me. Ma.1n, Huntington Beach Company hao reviewed the above referenced document and � supports the Springfield 011. Recovery Project a3 proposed . Section ',' of the Supplemental FIt, discusses project alternatives and Ldent ifles four alternative dr.illing siteri. Two of those four sites (Fari%ol. 1 , fotc . 7. 5 and Parcel 3, ,sec. 7. 8) .ire owned by the .iunt:ington Beach Company. Plea3e be advise4l that thosc parcels are not available for use Jin conjunction ncti.on with th+e Springfield project. arid :should not be considered felasible altlrnatiYe drill. sites , The HuntiUton Beach Company is currently pitocessing entitlements for residential development of' Parcel 1 . Parcel 3 is planned for future commarcial and residential developitent, conzistent with the property 's zoning. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on Supplemental R:CR 86-.1 . Very truly yours, 4k'7 � W, U. William 0. Holman Sr. Project ReprSseritative Y�r'•f, 1 Y t f �1-kM 9' �`J►llMPOA'--+�.+IfKl Of 7M OOV1a,. .4 t C�dA1E D/llMh+fJ1A�M, C�awre.r OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RMARCH am 1w Ma, "f4kA~0, CA OU14 Pam Poste►n October 1 , 1988 City of Huntingtrzn Beach 2000 Main titreet, trurri. Nni . Hunti ngtun Reach, CA 92648 suhJec-ta Angus Petroleum '5rringf-leld Area Oil RF co%/ery Project SCHO 86040917 mar Ms . Poseen ; The State Clearinghouse aubzi,1:ted the above named envirorurtental document to selected state agencies for review. 'fie state agency revi-ew period is rx)w closed and *one of they state agencies ha%- -� comments . This letter a►cknowledQoa that you have complied with they Skate Clearir9ghouse review requira nts for draft snvironmntal documents, pursuant to the California 9nVi r.tat Quality Act. Pleaw vonWt Keith 14e at 914r445.-0613 if yai live any questions regarding the environmental review process . When contacting the Clearinghouse roprding this ratter, please use tl';a eight--digit: Stzta Clearinghmw nur&er so that we may re�ipond prrx '-i,y. Sircerelyr Dev id C. Nunenk&V Chief Office of Mmit Ann is tonic e *fto �r a� I C i CTV." F.ESPO&S'ES TO COMMENIS ON 0RAFT STIR NO. 88V-.l. AND ^IR NO. lk tiJ•' i •;� .�r�• Ire Vic/ ` �..•.�...r..�yy.y.wwyy.N R.M .V��.iw�.i.(�ltil.�ry..w.r+• �rtiti11� 1 City of Huntington 13each .1111" A I yi . DEPAP'd#AENT oP LOMMt NITY UEVL4J0P?fit NT I i if �rlry�R�IQ�d 1110 am 636 2 V1ae�nlnE d1h1�►i� 1'�`�a'�"r'i I October 130 1988 Ms . Katy N, r'arrish Con4ernad Citizens for Huntington Beach 1919 Als,zr.a lane Huntington 04ach , CA 92648 SUBJECT: DRAFT 15UPPLENN1'AL EI R NO, 3 8•- 1. AND EIR NO . 8 G -1 Dear Ms . Porrish ! i 8taf! has investigated the xssueg raised in your letter of September 13 , 198A 4nd hba found tt:e following : Vie Inspector ,from the 5C.P.Q14D determined :h,it 'Chere was .A.g.�d1jat kLoblW. He detexmirii;d that any bust beinq creatsd in the area was probably coming from the unfinished ' that +s , dirt) City struts. No warning wags want: to &NGUS Petroleum by the 8CAOMD or any other agency. The comment states than, 6rea resider;ts were subjected to unhealthy layers of dust for a nine montti pariod between October 1. , 1987 and June 1, 1988 . Initial project construction did not commenr,e until. after November 27 , 1987, however, when. the City finest issued a site grading permit . Construction activity ceased less than. three Month;; late,` after the Preliminary Injunction was issued on February 16, 19880 During the period of coastructioi;, provisions of the approved Dust Ce)nttoi Plan includinq the use of A watax truck were carried out fully. It appears that this comment has failed to distinguish " turning radius" from street wilth . Figurer t of the Supplemental 1~lu dearly shown that s truck with a tu:n uA of 50 feet can easily turn from one street with a 40 font street width (curb to curb) to { another 40 foot wide street without requiring any special. parking >r�e t rf ct iouA . ` please review tho Angus oil Company for financial status and previous experience in projects of this type , l can ' t understand with the oft abundance and p�-:ces of ail being as low as they ore, h-ow this project could be economically feasible daring these times . This apiece of property has been around a long time and has never been developed by a large oil company. WHY? Ts this someanes pipe draam at. the expense of t~ho residential neig',` rhood? ghat happens it the project doesn ' t produce as expected' will it be re-..zoned again? I am closing with the hoped that you wr ' A look at this aituati.on from our point of view as homeowners , got future income to the city or the elimination of. ezisO ng wells in t ho surrounding areas , > because eventually, these wells will de,pluLIO themselves . The Angus Oil Company is claiming this is a unitization project in reality it Is a new drilling project in a residential area which in %gainst the zoning ordinence . .T, hope t dry not so,ind too arrogant , however , I am upset at what I have been hoari.ng and seeiag in regarde to this project: , and I do not believe it is in this beat int:eresct of the City or of the surrounding a rrya . I look forward to your prompt; response , sincek el i r Genoa r,e Corry RESPONSE Your concerns are noted and your cortwrients will be forwarded to decisionmakers Eoc their consi ierat ion . Thank you for your sttonti .3n to these matters . Sincerely Kelly n Assilttatt t Planner XN:gbm Attachment Response to Concerned Ci t i aexss of Lun t i ngton Seach Coriament o or. Draft S tR No . 18-2 and EXR No , 8E -1 p * ►� Draft SEIk No . 68-1 6► EIR ND . b6- 1 0-tober 13 r 1988 Page 2 of 2 The street improvements planned as part of the initial phast� of thr, project will be completed long before any trunks delivering drilling 4squipment and supplies will need to be in the pioject area . Tte two (2) heavy trucks arriving on a daily average basis will be going slaw, preparing to turn, as they approach the project site and therefore should pose no Brisk to any school children waiting for a school bus art the enit~ side of Delaware Street . The risk would be less than that from the numerous cats that drivb on Delaware Street at and above tht speed limit . As to the number of trucks , Mr . John D. Car-michael. ' s letter of September 17 , 1966 estimated the numbor of heavy truck trips required to support the drilling of each well. . That, estim�te remains 30 trips per well . As eauh well will take between 15 and 3' days to drill and complete, the number of heavy trucks visiting the: site during the drilling please on a daily average basis remains 2 or less . Th6 Trip Generation Forecast on page 31 of the SEIR uses a daily average of 3 per diy to be conservative . i Thank you for your attention to these matters , j Since! ly, Kell M11 � Assiat:att I�lani�:: :gbm ( 1460d) . s r , The wells surrounding that site would consist of an earthtone broken block stall, . The Project would be cor4itioned to comply wxth the landscaping requirements of Chapter 15. 22 of the Huntington peach Ordinance Code. prior to the installation of any landscaping, a landscaping irrigation plan would be submitted to the Department of Develppment Services and Public Works for review and approval . C. aT NO. e The standard metback for a resident to 1 home is 15 feet . Mince this is an industrial use, wouldn' t; you tend to agree that setback* should be larger than 15 feet `which would allow a larger buffer zone between the site and the reuidence . It would also decrease the possibilities of accidents. It must: be noted that these rigs stand a few hundred feet it the air , and If an accident u:. ! occur , it would effect the residence . RE'S1.30I1S5 The Project sethaeks , in conjunction with the bul frer. provided by the City right-of-wa; , provide an adequate buffer between the project and residences in the area . Please rafer to §4 . J.0 of the SE1R (pages 37-43) for a discussion on public health and saffty issues . COMMINT NO. 9 <e.gnaiye s U1. I would propose that they dr. i ] i near the Civic; Ce:iter which is a commercial, zones area . of course , it would cost ::he oil comp&Ay more mc.ney to drill from what_ location.. howeve.L , at leash vit would blend in better. . i Please refer to S7 . 5 and 7 . 6 of the 'EIR (pages 61-63) . The site refe;ered to in the comment is toned R-•1 . COMMUT NO. 10 i Pleader read Vage 7-1 of the Ells reToort on alter.ni tives . I personally rrjo i�ot like to be threatened by a aondorr.inium project being developed vs . a residential Lirojacr . If the planning j commission can ;%a* c=ondominiump being developed on a site that a►iready has hoots on it and oil wells, they Mutt be blind. Also, I be114r O the intensity should he reduced. As a matter of fact , this prof t should lot even be allowed in a reasidantial area as m1ready stated. This SIR report does not address the homeowners concerns and is very biased in ray opinion , please read Rimvironmental Check list forms , you will note, there cure is a lot of mRyba ' s . y w.rri f `well services rigs sha? l ties operated no more than 45 days per year between 7: 00 a . .m. and 7 : O0 p .m. or del-light hours , whiabovrr is shorter . No move than 4 well service rigs may be on tbo premises at any one time. The services rigs shall not exceed 120 feet in height and shall be deauhlea-muff Lead and urtf l: se acoustical blankets . " i CONMNT NO. 5 aSNQiat12A .q1_JtbIL homed su, Xgunlaigg an industriAl .jItia. Y just purchased my t i rant home and I am concerned that if an emergency was to occur and ! had to sell my home, how would potential buyers fe3el about buying a home surrounded by drilling rigs operating 24 hours a debt Mould yore buy a home across the street from a project like this? RRBPt�N�� In Jarvary 1988 , the Spririgfi,eld Px:ope:ty 'Trust was created to protec. homeowne vs in the area against depreciation of thair property resulting from the Project ., Mr . Corry ' s property is Included within the area covered by the Spr. ingfie ld Property 'Trust . &gAina: This land is c:urrLbntly zoned as "ON which ZXggessl.�r ax bib- ►ts- =u �,�.ng 22jk .a��. To allow this project to proceed, the City hus to re--scone this area . The zoning was also written to protect the residant;ial, area from new well drilling . Now can you allow this in a► residential area which has been soLed for resident i r 1 units . Whet good in zoning if ran change it all the t;imea? it was initially coned 10" to allow the existing wells to cr►ntinue pumping which is fair since they have been here many years . RESPONSE ' Pleases refer to S4 . b of the FUR het . 86- 1 (pages 21--28) , which discusses Project consistency with they Ci.ty ' s Zoning Laws aril General V1an. CQWORT MO., '1 1. The SIR repor status our homes are 10 to 15 years oldo My horse is only 7 years old. Will they block weel.l surrounding the sites bliaud or semi-match each types of housing feature. The domes along California Street between Rochester an4 Springfield have op brift fadades. will this block wall have; brick incorporated into its design? The landscapinq around the site noods to be well maintained , bond should be posted to insure this . We suggest that ` you takes a drive by our homes, and takes a look at them. (1459d-3) y This propo4el d drill site is located between California Street and Delaware, RoChoster and Bpringf iesld Streets and is Surrounded by t esidential homes on three sides. Tire value of the project is in the Congo of 2!010000000 . 00 . I have been watching the City of Huntington Beach develop and I like what has 1)eeen approved , however, there 3eeeems to be no way that a project of this, magAitudo could be constructed and not have an effect on the neighborhood. I have just: recently received the Savironmentat Impact Deport and I am concerned about a few things in which 1 Would like you to review and ccn;:,equently, respond to: ProJeect has been revised since 1906 . . The number of wells has been reduced to 30 - 45 . t:(}PMNT NO. 3 liri, llit4g noise for a period of one (1) to two (2) years using a 1 , 000 horsdpower• electric motor .: for twenty-four (24) hours a day . Will your guarantee us that this drilling operation will not he a amisance? They 81R report is not detailed enough in regards to the effect the noise level will have on the surrounding residence, especially at night . How about limiting the drilling period to daytime hours only. RESPONSE Please reefer to the ray3ponse to Comment 22 by the Concerrned Citizens of Huntington Beare. COMMENT NO. 4 Mainternanca of the wolls . This will occur after the' wells are Completed . Lots sap they have 60 wells than need to be cleaned two timev a year . This operation takes approximately two days per well. , which equals 120 days out of a year a pulling rig will be operating 00 the Sitar oxeati,Ag noiaa. Perhaps you car requIst that they Insulate them pulling rigs even though the actual Mork accurs during the daytime hours . What about they neightors that work out of their hP:Asa , have daytime boarders, and the peoples that work of night, will this noise create a nuisance In their ease? i know that a PulA409 rig Mill **coed the City noise ordinance if un--insulated. Please, respond du this with your views . one Option in to limit the aa6ft2t,,.0f Wells to be drilled which In turn will decze6ser the toa►a itr� >�t�tico. pp: Tb* Ugd permit f*r the Project, if approved, will include the foilowing conditions , (1459d -2) i , ! -*kip r City of Huntington Beach NMI cAUP011Mlh " +.. ,• COM�►ATp1oMT df C�ARI�IITY S�al/a�.ol'6�Nt alvir W 501 d October 13 , 1908 Kt., Geeotge Corry 1801 California Street Huntington Beach, rA Qd':648 SWICT : DRAFT SUPPL12MRTAL L 1 R NO. 8 8-1 AND E 1 R NO. 8 6-1 Door Mr . Corry: Staff has investig&ted the issuas rained in your letter. of October 6, 1988 and hae+ found they following: CCMNZRT 140 . 1 Letter to Mayor Rrakine and 1:ity Council members dated! October 6, 1988 , 1 am re-submitting tho attached letter. dated July 30, 19861 as I feel thore are many alpects of this project which are still valid concerns that I have . My position in regards to this projecc remains unchanged a ,: I feel that an ;1str.JA1 PrOjeet in a re: &deential nsighbol' food would be a detriment to out quality of living. S x1neerely request that you vote against this project . Your 40sootn is noted snd your aoaaaant will be forwarded to ;, r isti rs lar. I-heir conoidee*atfon. zatt#t to Hoot 1bvidic and Cowmil fibers dated July 30, 1986 � nawe is Geor 01„orry and I an a homeowner at the above stated 4ss#s., neighbors and I =ro very concerned about a proledt 4' Which will be up for review by the planning Commission sowtime in wrrtelftr4 This protect is being proposed by Angus oil Co. Vh�ch 1fit0 to a-fill 90 - 40 now wells over a period of two (2) yeara . .AeON Oil Co. has purch*W two blocks of land, in which there are '` approximately six homes on presently. f , r 12& Got. AVV 34 013) . As shown by the responses to comments, no now D•t ra or Vatentiallx significant impscts have been identified by r ft the 31R. go revi ni one to the BRIR are rsaqui r*4. rwitdUlation 1s not required . Thank you foryour attention to th►eaL matters . xe 1 ly Kta i Assistant Planner zc*, Chatubers Group , Inc . 2933-8 Pullman Bkrest Banta Ans, CA 92705 h ' (14404-16) s h1y. 'T rl • I' h I' ynM n i ' A' P f 11 please geftr to the response to Comsat no . 129 Pleas@ Nee also Mee 11, 39 and ai of the 91911 and pegs 4-53 of the origis#1 21R. rd�U au Quantities of each hazardous chemical projected for use should be estlmstsfi. An analysis should be made of the impact of spills of the quantities of oath chemical as wall as combination of chemicals ' on the surrounding area . Please see ,-ages 3BA ' if the DSPIK, Based can the extremely low j level of hazardous c' .. cal use, the regulation of any such use by federal , state and ' .:al regulation, and the stringsitt spill control features contained �n the Project design, the use of haxardaias chemicals would not have any significant impacts . i The dEIR does not nddrems the traffic impacts associated with the construction of the gas and water pipelines . rhare is no gas pi.pelitie . Please refer to the response to Comment No . 2 , under "Traffic Impectia . " Our roview of the SWR has pointed out several major deficiencies in tbe document including the omiasion of analysis of two major pipelines dir*otl,y associated with the project as well as not 9OW14ing a costrehensive analysis of the cumulative impact$ of the OF fed project . Additionally, the rystems safetysapmts of the sod $iXo ect and several other iss%iom have not been adegustely ► ev$". Sukatentiai revision of the current- Draft 5211 is a !;OW r f tad o since the rev i sad document will undoubt 4ir ftitya dotal significant impacts, we believe that the revised i; mmuldbe recirculated as a Draft dh1R to allow furthor VW 00bOtb PonsYbllQ AgeeCieh and the public War* it AAL Oft tion b ► the decision makers of the City. .y' fto recirculation of the responses to comments on a draft EIR is not required unless tba responses contain substantial new information showing the passibility of a significant onviromwntal impact . (See rub. hesour4e6 Code 121002 . 1 t Cal Adain. Code, tit . 14 $15162 . 3 a, F do ear .a eibl� 1 e�riedi .ice- �► mesa 2C Ruuarxiaer■ (lrhl) XW W 41 '�'1YJsr[ �.,��'.:� '.+•� � I lilu.t+.wSW:' . �L_ 1i MY _. 1 T ropre■surisation. 1njoction wells will be Located away from poorly abiwWoned wells and in closer proximity to producing wellso ensuring that f roo gas will flow to the producing w*llx . On page 43, a oagvehonsive contingency plan is required to to prepared in case any leaks occur in the 13 wells which have not been abandoned to Mdem standards . The 8811 should discuss the impact of :dire and/or explosion at the drill rigs it addition to those impacts associated with coil storage . The drilling equipment will be equipped with Class III Blow Out Prevention Equipment as described in Figure 6 of the original MR. Plate* see also Appondix F of the original Ells, "Gil. and Gas Well Blowout Prevention in CaliforniA . Addttionally, the reservoirs of the Project are well known, having been prnduced for over 60 gears . '.^he ressivoir pressure is well below hydrostatic and will ire easily controlled b,► the dr4 11ing triud. Therefore, all anticipated subsurface pressures will be contained by the weight of the arua , If a fire should occur, the open cellars will allow the Fire Dapartmen- to control it from the surface without entering the cellars themselves . The SEIR should discuss the potential for release of -aria containing H28 from both the facility and from the pipeline . H,4zard footprints should be calculated based on the concentration cf H2S as well as the volume in the pipelines or well head . Please refer to the response to Comment 4110 . 21. "(6 MIt should discuss the potential for fire and explosion from 4 doftiYgl gas at the well hea4 or in the proposed pipeline . With sespect to well head fire, please see the reari nse to Comment No. 36 abovo. Also, as dAscussed in the xesposise to Comment No. 1.2 , this project will use an eximtinq gas gathering system. He ln*9004ftal file --with In czoated by the use of the existing system. The 5111R should discuss the incre v.,atal impact of oil spills or fires its the Chevron crad a oil, pipall.ne . ( 1440d-14) 4wrs 1(� i+ i1 ivcurrence could occur during the life of the proJoct . The analysis } of this section is fully inadequate, lacking quanticative analysis issevoino reasonable woL-st-case analysis and fail* to provide Jetallod mitigation measures to mitigate or reduce the censequae, -� s of an upset or sccl dent . ftesse rotor to pages 4- 52 - 4--56 of the original EIR, and paljk,,s !� 37- 3 of 'thee 19819. The coo mentator e s chat acterixati 3n of the E, jovalustiott of the risk from firog is incorrect . The dEIR states that the possibility of a fire is a significant unavoidable adverse Impeat of the pro4 ect , although the likelihood of occurrence ,As very low, (See SUR at p . 6) . The conunent is also incorrect in stating that it is likely" that such an event court occur in the life of t:he project . As stated in the SE'LA, :he likely 4aoad is "rare" 1`1: 10 , 000 - 1. : 1, 0D0 , 000) . Raro events have only occurred a few times on a worldwide basis . The efore , it is extremely unlikely that, a worst-case fire of a magnitude described in the EIR could OCCU r . 1 i'�nt so- 24 Additionally, a preliminary risk management plan and spill contingency plan should be provided during review of. the SEIR in order to fully evaluate the effec:tivenese of the programs proposed -for mitigation . AAR:WAX i The Environmental Protcction Agency, Division of 0J.1 and Can and the City of Huntington Beach all require a Spill Contingency Plan before the facilities can go into operatit;n . This imill be done. s►t �a. 3 5 The $919 statee that there will not be any imapact caused by leaksgs Of go* duo to repressurisation of the formation. Thin cancluaion is b8sed on studies Andicating► few Current problems with existing I* M. 6 #r ad waterflood project poseld initially rabstanktaily. feade pressure within the formation and ea,`4lr causes �. lo&M 4t wells thAt ourrently do not leak. Additional studies dVO t ir*d to detearine the extent of this L pact and realistic 4itiltation M648urss such as resealing of wells, use of gran detsater$ s aed the use of eva+cuotioa plans must bra provWed* Me' ' Issas is dfscussed on pages 39, 40, 42 and 43 of the DMR. Pal* 40 explains the effects of wager flooding on gas lealrs, certcludinq that it will "reduca tba amunt of free gas and losses the passibility of qaa �eak►s. " As $toted on pa96 e3, any free gas will flow to areas of for pressure. The producer walis are areas of law prsrssute, and the +has will flow there throughout the process of -W� . i AGEM f F F , m' i The facilities do not require vacuum trucks . brains are provided ii. ! B0Cb collar and in the containment area of the oi. i hand l i v g fbailities . if a spill should occur , the system is designed to pump the Imp►1lid fluid bank through the separation system and into the tanke, as described on pages 41 and 42 of they SE1R , They benzene emission calculations shown in the SEIR were made for the purpose of comp*rison with the SCAQ14b Proposed Rules 223 and r l i 1401 (beer Appendix No , i) . These proposed rules are designed d for I analysis of a new source' s potential to increaaey individual canoe, risks . here are no guidelines within these proposed rules relat .nq to lour level, sho:t term exposure risks associated with benzene omissions since this in not thought to be a significant health risk by health authorities . The SE19 fails to mention the expected concen rstior: of H S within i the gas extracted from the well . Since sour gas occ ur. s w�tni.n than E Huntington Beach Fields , the Air quality analysis should include modeling of they exposure of H 6 to area residents in the event of release of toxic ryas . There is no 12S in the gas producei from the Project reservoirs (See Appendix 4 , page 10) . �n=at 2a• ...22, .Raise The SUR, as welt as the previous LIR slid not quantify the magnitude of impact of the noise assueiate wtth the drilling operation. The extent of mitigation afforded by the control measures have not been quantified in order to determine whether impacts have been reduced to insignificance. NF The pte14dt .witl swat the Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance with well slarlmod undtrrotood technology. See noise analysis in the original t 54 . 01 page$ 4-42 through 4-50, Appendix S of that alR and AP040dia 3 of the SE2R. ,�,...� J"IL fAf,. Man ate.igad Safes ,no' 00astruttion of a major tail and gas facility in close i oaimity tO s44identisl areas presents special systems safety problems . The anal"is in the San generaily takes the approach that if an even. is unlikely to occur, there it no impact: . The geneRral, stat*-Of-the-art analysis for oil and gas projects base the project iI Octl oat cOMSVOncea of an a-oident , not upon the probability of OCCU MUCO. It 14 likely that even an event of low probability of ;�� (144od-12) i 1 r I ! r I 'l'h8 SNIR only contsinb one rendering of the proposed project . It +s 4006 not xMW Ocala nor does it hawv a description of perat>speCtive. f 960 Cal se tled rorZeringssl from several viewpoints would be inaconsary to OVIONS the visual impact . The people and autowbiless in the ren�le>ri.ng are for the purpose of showing scaler. The tendering is drawn to perspective in order to 06W visibility at eye level . Because the vier of the Project site rid be the Was from all viewpoints, except that gates would occur in two wells {as shown in Figure J . ) , additional renderings would not differ from the one included in the 17SSIR and Would not provide additional assf xtence its evaluation visual impacts Lomm>st Ila. ,,1AA._.,_,A iCdUAlitX r `the SSIR (lies not deaaxcribe the air quality impacts associated with construction of the gas and water pipoline& . ADMWX Where is no gas pipe) - ne . Please rater to the >resposnae to Comment No . 2 , under "Aix quality" , for a cliscussios>n of potential air impacts . The SZIR also does not ade ess the dust related impacts noted by area 'ho" -omwrs during the initial construction phase . Additional mob:;uresr for dust control such an use e)f dust control chemicals should be disegased. plosoe as* Appendix 61 page 1, Response to Con ament No . 20 fur a dilauSSiasn of dust impacts currently noted by area re3idents . �4 F otia� awa sutes�► !or dust control are set forth at pages41-42 of ti tSO SYN. ordf, ,,q to the Public 'works Department of th• r . 7, ' t ad measures will adequately mitigator the Project ' s dust Impacts* t t AAch 11 the daih do*$ onalyxe ossilssriosa x aassocistfd with normal `16-0 �Y OPOrations it falls to calculsrta emissions associated with 6ik' 40118 in the facility. Because the facility is in close pro Xtoit:+ to c>lesidentiel units, the omissions , including public insell to ,1 anssene, should be calculated for an episode whet* oil sa 10MOd and contained In the contaiwunt area and then cleaned up by *Walm truck. c144od-11y Please refer to the response to Comment No. Z. under water {duality. ' ]Please also see pages 41-43 of the DBEIR (t 4tablishing siti ation meravures for the release of materials from :.hay project ' site i COMMt. 1A The BEIR falls to ident:Zfy the impact of di oposal of filtrate material associated with the processing of injection water . ASAWK r The * filtrate" from the water filters consists of clean injection water . This water will be injected into the underground reservoirs . The material filtered from the .produced water :onsisLs mainly of sal,t4 of Silicon, Icon ane Calcium, noria of which is hazardous . This material will be disposed of, as necessary, at a proper dispo3a! site in conformance with regulat46ns of governing agencies . The SEER fails to address the impact of the proposed project on the sainting CCBR' s for the proposed project . K The MIR evaluates the environmental impacts of '-he Project agaiinsL a baseline of existing envirunment,al conditions, as required by C20A. The project description and evaluation of impacts clearly Identify arse take into account the character of the neighborhood . The DBUR furthdor evaluates project consistency with City planning Veiiviels ($to 08968 21-28) . CEQA does not require the evaluation of the Prolog: against private contractual arrangements in th3 area . 1%e 12 does not address the flood lighting required during the 86 iCea flood lights will be used (see pegs 39) . The derrick will bm eWIQ*ed and all lights, escopt the oircraft watraine light, will be on t%e inside of the acoustical blanket . Light:: around the MAZOI fir O&Ipont will be near ground level and w*11 below the top of the 36' acoustical wall. (1440d -1a) 4 astor line st destruction of bridges , opening of fi ssurt in thle i grovad, OrA 1araftlides) ssould riot be Significant . The Facility wa►u44 Out down under a "fail-snfep system# ka soon as the power gent off* No esaaergeney situations would be isreatad requiring i fste attention by, or an augmentation oft public sala►tlt p�redennui. The MIR falls to identify the wetat quslith impacts asiocieted with the construction and operitji n of the prop►oned gab: pi,galina and brine plpel iAe►. f There is no gas pip~:lire requited . Please refer to :he reaponse to Cannent No . 2 , under "Wetter Quality. " The bEIR f ai 13 to identify the water; quality i.mpects sssoc� sted with the potential ruptl.►re of the crude oil pipeline carrying thn oil produced by titer proposed project to the Chevrun faci 1 i+y. While wo tinderstand that the use: of an existing pipeline controlled by Chevron la proposed , the proposed pro,act will nevertheless create addi.tioral quantition of Gil shipped in the pipeline and the release of this additional oil should be addrented . An dieccussed on page 41 of the SExs, the addition 0 the Project ' a oil stream would reduce pressure on the crude oil pi.pelino . peceuso the oil from the Pro#eat would eater the pipeline at a higher temperature than the ail currently in the pip*li.ne, • it would re4uas the viscosity of th6 oil . Thia, in t urne would reduce premours in the pipeline, thereby decr:essing the possibilit-y of pipali.ne r%gtur+e when cowpare4 to existing coft4iti.ons . Theroloret, Psoject-related crude oil in t!o pipeline, would have the &i fect of ze,ftwig tho po"tbtlity of rupture. Evon if the pipeline rulptureed, the only oil that would be released would be the oil in the pipellne betwom block valves . Autowatic abutdow un would keep the twrawatal eol"O of oll attributable to the Project at an insignificant 1&vol in this *went of pipeline rupture. ' $% ltvloW section dues not addr"s the water quality iop+tuts to the groundwatAt aquifer due to the release of c ru6o oil, solvcxto or other toellc material . J . . F. 1 1 r 11,• hater## lines, destruction of bridger, opening of fissures In the Slides) %ould net be signifloa t . The FOCI! ty .• � 1 U-16.4t 0 "fail- sefo" system# as peon as the VMMr x situations wml.d be or.�p��rd sZ�uiRir�q hlit o, fay, or 'fin aagsontation oil p+iblia safety ' rr SZ21k fails to identify the water quality impacts essoctstdd with the construction and operation of tho proposed gas pipollne and brine pipeline. The,ro Is no qsr; pipeline requirald . Pliss 0 rotor to the response to commant lro. 2, under "Water Quality. " The 83IR fails to identify the water quality impacts associated with the potential rupture of the prude oil pipeline Carrying the ail Mofst*M-01 dgged 04 p.ro ogee pra�eect to the t;r�e�v�xon facilit Mile we - tut- trio` use of an enistin pipeline oontroi od by w oe is proposed, the proyfsad pro Oct will navorthele ss cresto ..� a4ditional quantities of oil shipped in the pipeline and the release at this additional oil should to addrevoedb As $#4040� PS94, 41 of, the dSTa., the addition of the lrOJOW s 31 . o M i~0tiioe Prosaure on' the crude oil p,ipel ine # 500suae 'lr +s A' a j t ld' a ntor the plpelin* at a highdr .,, tempo-r#gate than tbo oil currently in the pipeliftc ~it would reduce the `;tom, ei i T'hi.s, 16 turno Would rerduce pressuO in the pi,pollne,, th► reby dodressinq the possibility of pipolirW ruptute ► , .;, nip, dared to oXistiaq conditions. Tharetoirer projoet*-Irelated orUdo oil inthe pipeline would) leave the effect of reducing the es hilt ► of , CuptsEtc zresn if thepi.poilne ruptured, the only oil *t would be released wctild bey that oil in the ipelia* between ' block valves. Automatic shutdownc would Mop t90 incremental Vuluae of oil - attributable to the Project st an 1nFt9-AfiC:nt level In the eves oaf pipeline ruptures 1 The hydrology section does m)t addreue the water que 1,i ty irnpacta to the groundwatdr aquifer duce to the relesso of crude oil , solvents or other toxic material . r• dam .y ^ IlkM The range of alter-aativa *valuated in the SNIR meats, and ex+: a, .� this rpr u i sestert o i�►is toJ4ent.ify an Ravirowwatally 4uperiar A%k6lbotive seN wd .. fl.513 a fis tho CA0A qui8el i nea . r' aUAm They ilbandommt: of All Oil iroducing Sites, 57 .E is idsFo.tif fed Us the 'envitonimtelly preferable alternative" in $7 .4 . 2 on page 60 . a F ►' t C�s�i�t � � , The sz;lt fti2s to pttovidee a full list of preparers as required by aw Thq rinoipsl pispsrors are listed on page 1 of the sxrR. OrWitstions 6A1 pdreons', consulted are listed on page 71 , QuWat f 404 . ZQRgSrAghX. _Agilg�Rnd GS21 This tst;,tsi 1% to Wreas the consequences of the 8 g+ aatthguokq the; gpovi� 'ors •ot focili.,Aos including such effects 'ao ruptu' ring St � i, b�tbi�rA `,Of tsnks, rupturing of containment dikes ;and other* �# I 1thit ' bulgy have w 'potexttial for release of product . pia Wood •� the pot"ti*2. to effect tho neighboring; reild6he6 t gtl, r hbat; any public~ safety impacts 'asq•ociatud w ►th t' to", C 644"tiAl anitsi, No mitigation measures are provided in 6C a 'Oroc'adures r mobile contain"nt f ecili t ies or the 1 1oky M' uby potential impacts associated with the release of- products during �a seismic event. rr i The 496fts of 4*i oats events of the Project are dascribrid on page$ l� -- of tier 4wrk. +consequences of an m Co o or gr111ater O*rthtlWake are described on page 17. as stated on page il, oil wi l� 60 shi#lam oh: a icot9ltinuous bads, so that all of the tapks in the all storage area will rtevek� be full at the mama time. The oil � utorcage, area is located sic feat beelow 'grade, and the area is stcrrroundedl by trelnfore!)d concrete ratai.ni.nir walls . The volume of this depressed retaining basin excseds the Uniform Aire Codee and blvisidn of oil and Gas reequirwrents, by a factor of 2 gip. 12) even if the retaitti.ng walls rupturedo the L gtalning arse would hold oil released by tanks which burst or overturn. As stated on page ' 17, if they epicenter of the earthquake were 140ated in the area, no known Mitigation measures could aneure that the cumulative effects of the earthquake (including the breaksoe of � ( 1440d-S) J 11 Y h a J I 8011 falls to ed4ross a full tango of alternatives. In 1pit'rticulsto It dour not t6drear the alternative of prooe psiu oil at b N r � from the proposed project area . This alteernstives "Frie�' ,*�Ib aliklall jp' r ',�it r the ar*1tte sMfe tr ftApaot ar�roaiated with 0 fire i.a they stocsVt tankea . It also doer not address the W, oil Itor,agee Aitornati.vo not doom it address alternative designs of the proposed facilities on the proposed sites . Additionally, the doc nk „eras not consider an alternative where the unprocessed oil 1. is tr.pnjk*rrsd via . • llemi pipeline to the Chevron facility.. eeliminit1dp the need for Separate processing facilities . R Ann 6 The Of', evaluSte s ten alternatives to the proposed Pro jeect . In addition to the "no prejoct" alternative, two revisions to the Proposed Project are evaluated ( "Reduced intensity Alternatives'` and Note intense Drilling Vrogram") . Pour alternative sites ar'o ersmilnod; the evaluation of one of these alternative sites examinees two poteentiol 0snfiqurationS. They 'overall abandoimont of oil a � prodfaotion to 6valudted, as is the d*voloptaent of a medium-aonsity I' residential project on the Project site . ee 41 �r i �dto 01% " gwrely consists of separating the oil from water. . 04 p�4od Oda 6 sl remote * from the Project sfto, two „Ytt il1 ,04oliao oe s would have to be constructed. *ae weeld trflixspott 011 ' At d, wrte�r to the romoteft cite; tho other would' return p ►yd s;e �era�e6st, under pressure. The Chevron faci litT is meraly � to-putt kla'too and does not have the capacity to uor&rata oil from wer,tez, ! were not stared on they project site, any risk of fit* "truld slowly ba as6ved to another area . Furthermore, the additional water VIV61ine Mould create a hazard of rupture because it mould be uMbr pirossurero tuh water pipeline for the Project , in contreat, is h low pressure pipeline. rho currant design of the Project in intended to mitigate visual, -Aolsoi, an4 traffic impacts of the Project on the suri-ounding 044iyhbo r ud. Altatuat;ive **signs were not evoluste d in the ddlR ,be�aaueee t would twt result in the mitigation of impacts . CMK does dot roquire analysis of every Imaginable altee:riative. the State CRQA Qui.drelino's state as follows t "Thee re;aq* of alternatives required its the sIR is govownebd by the rule of reason" that requires the EIR to met forth only those alternatives neece asary to permit a reasoned choicer. The kesr issuo is whether the selection and discussion of alternatives fasters Wormed decision-making and informej ,public participation. An EIk need not consider an alternative who** effect cannot be reasonably mareMrtained and whose Implementation is remote and speculative. " (CAI . Admin. code, Iwo tit. 14 $15126) . (14404-7) r '14i it Of past, tOSSAt, end reasonably anticipated future projercta, or a sns projections contetwo in an adoptod general plan or r6lat plasm" document* (JUL) 6 d"wwwwat atates that cumulative impacts relatiAq to seeismicity# a�t�Rire' a ud ' atwriala, noia* 804 voter quality were not adequately Y disautdea. The DUIR concludes that the project would not have ndirats effects an triter quality or adverse effects resulting from hax a rdous materials . Therefore, the 00EI2 does not ana lyxe cumulative impacts in these areas , because the Project would not ' contribute to the impacts of any othex projects in the area . Mitigation measures for noise impacts take into accouct cumulative noise impacts. The Project is required to comply with the City' s Noise ordinance, thereby ensuring that the pliMulative noise level in the project vicinity will not exceed community noise standards. Additionally, cumulative noise impacts are discussed in DSHIR No. 88-1 on page 52 . The Project is engineered to withstand aelsmic events E up to an+earthquake of 14 8 . 0 . Even in an earthquake of • this magnitude, the well dollars should not break. (DBEIR at p. 17. ) As described more fully in the response to Comment 10 , the subsurface design of the oil etorege area should prevent the release of oil . to light of the aM1&t1v9 effects of such a major earthquake, however, including tho' bteeikkale of water lines, destruction of bridges, fissures opening in the ground, and beading of rails (see Id.J , the dEIR conalaidus that significant unavoidable adverse impacts could result if an earthquake of K e .0 or greater occurs . It :a also important to recognize that the cumulative impacts of the proposed Project must be compared to existing conditions . Under existing conditions, a major earthquake would damage operating tank batteries, none of which is engineered to achieve they level of seismic safety required of the Project . A major earthquake would rupture the tanks and cause many flow lines to break, resulting in oil spills. Th+srofo3re, the Project would reduce cumulative effects on seismic safety, by removing 22 wells and 7 associated tank battdries which could be damaged, by an earthquake of lower magnitude than would affect the Project . §15130 of the State CEQA Guidelines does not require an analysis of "overall curmulative impact. " The term is not used in CEOA, and the meaning of th14 comment is unclear. It appears that the author of the connent is requesting a judgment as to they "overall" significance of a 1 l of the impacts of the Project , and further requesting mitigation me . surer for this "overall" impact , If all individual impacts are mitigated to the extent feasible, the "overall" impact is also mitigated to the extent feasible. "Th. "owarall" nignificence of the Project ' s impacts is an issue for decision-maker8 to determine, in deciding whathex• or not to approve the project , ( 1440d--6) i •, 1 1 , x , 1 1 1 1 =Elm y 9 re *i1Ya1s, the bblb incorrporates specific criteria. rot •xr Y the significance of impacts ftoo noise is measured against the C ftlse Ordinance. In other instances, the determination of � •• Q *" was related to the context of the activity. For � •Jildgmant as to the aesthetic impacts of the projoch is Ier4 ubjectivo . because the project has cause controversy in , t n� . horhood, the stye concludes that the project rcould have a •i�s�l.linatat ufiavoidable adverse impact cn aesthetic$ - (bee REIE at Pogo C 29. ) The d ZR is an important source of information regarding the potential aignificarce of impacts . Decision-makers will also take ieto account other sources of information, however, including � iiitteta and oral testimony by the public and public agencies, in reach$np their determinations as to the significance of the Project' e impacts . The effectiveness of mitigation measures and the significance of residual impacts have been clearly identified, both in the Summary section and in the discussion of each area of potential impact . The sections entitled "Significant Unavoidable Adverse impacts" identify any Impacts which have not been mitigated to a level of iftsiS0111canco, This is true of All sections except the section on noise its the Oussnrry $2 .9) , the section on Traffic and CirculationItpectp in the teat (54. 6) 0 and the section on Energy Conservation in the text ( 14 . 12) , *here this statement was inadvertently omitted. This does not moan, however# that the level of residual impact has not been Identified for these impacts . The reset tsf the hPE1R states clearly that there will be no significant unavoidable adverse noise impacts. (see p. 37) . The Summary section states clear' 2y that there *111 be no significant unavoidable adverse r impacts relating to traffic and circulation (see p. 5) or energy conservation (see PA) . Therefore, for every impact, the BEIR identifies thn effectiveness of mitigation measures . Although the BEZR does identify various projects for cumulative anslysih , it fails to provide an analysis of the overall cumulative impact, determination of the significance of this impact and formulation of mitigation measures as requires in 115130 of CEQA . The analysis fails to reflect the full range of cumulative impacts particularly for systems nafety, seismicitlr, hazardous materials , noise and Meter quality. AnMW The State CtQA guidelines provide that "cumulative impacts shall be discussed when they i,lgi sianff cant . " (Cal . Admin . Code, Tit . 14 515130(a1) , emphasis added . ) The discussion *shall reflect the soverity of the impacts and their likelihood of occurrence, but the discussion need not provide as great datail an is provided of the effects attributable to the project alone. (ZA.. at §15130(b) . ) The discussion of cumulative impacts may rely one a list ( 1444d-5) M' I�11 w, rr lye 1 � It ell, a fs the project "Quid ipi atetered on the enr It* tke existing cho oh low press to +i u rss�atington stroot., a+rrr was PfP61tne { � Tb# the Pre j oct �Vftaj 00t Sit* is ra11wr unique in that the proposed drilling and p;Ggessing site is located directly adjacent to residential units. Jb#1 Sniff does not a4dre0% the Impacts in enough dGtai 1 necessary to ( detarolne the actual impact$ nor does it Identify specific altigStion awexures to reduce any client i f f ed impacts . Of particular . concern it tics+ refit eae of toxic materials during accidents ark! drills, as weil as the migration of gas due to the repressuri,sati.on � k of the formation. Within the it than 20 drilling n9 processing and rocessin sites are City, more r 1'6catod in residential areas . Therefore , the project is not "uri4gta' . The pac3-liti.es Site in not located "directly adjacent" to rdoldential Vrr s+ It is .separated by public rights-of -way on all sid . `i`tt 1at1r*s, .-, s -number of existing dtilli�ng aW proceining sites are "dt tactly ;.sdjecent• to residential aaress, without the buffer Provided by public $treats. 'h#`1.1404 the -*44, aalitigation measures concerT14 . 10 toxic materials, sc illt� rind .'4iq %tioa •af pas are discussed on &gas 38 th h!,43 of t"' 'Bi1N. In a4dirion, please refer to the responses sif nt :fir 3 r. under "Water Qua+.i ty, " and to the responses to wats ; ox"rS ;10, .13# 2.�, 33, 26, 28, 29 and 30. The 612 fails to identify the criteria that ware used for the determination of significance of impacts . Additionally, the W444lvaaaus of the mitigation measures and the significance of the ros JAU61 '4 ►acts have not been clearly defined. The 89IR FOLLOWS THE CRITERIA MR SIGNIFICANCE ESTABLISHED BY LAW. The State CMA Guidelines provide as follows : "Thee determination of whether a project may have a significant effect on the environment calls for a careful judgment on the pact of the public agency involved, based to. the extent possible on acienti f is and factual data . An Ironclad definition of, significant 811ACt is +got ng,6�tfAl2 b gaulft—she 114 Col. Admin. Coale, Tit . 6, S15064(b) ] ( 14406-4) x I I I cline will be instollera, surveyed, inspected, and the ttenob 1.le4,, is OAS der. During the day, barriers would enMaci that qp not approach tre"hes. This is stax4ord operratinq 11i tbd conhtruo ica of, ax Worgcobnd piplrllms, no dbs i+bi able pUblie safety Impacts Mould resulb from od tv ion of *atom pipolinat : The only possible air Impact from construction of the eel no would be the temporary impact of dust emission. This idl�pact is dISCU4*ed on page 4-37 of the original Rin, which states "Ta_ a,rary impacts will result from project construction f 80tivitier . Air pollutants will be emitted by construction PWAt and dust will he generated by grading and site �►z�pa�rration. The raid► atioa measures set forth on page 4-41 shall apply to all construction phases of the project, including the construction of the aster pipeline. QUallo: An described on page la of the BEIRp the water line I u ed pproaimstely 30 inches below thestreet surface. .a :surface water . Even if orator f soarthe d40 ' Orclundwsterr, this would not have a s►ignifidant, as #Wned in the original Brit on page 4-12: "The water found in (both shallow and deep groundwatar7 iQUifats is, for the most part, brackish, potable waster has been tracteo from aquifers in the Huntington Beach or**, olihd64h usutlly only in areas east of the Mewpott-Inglev=4 Fault . The project site is went of that fault and is* in fact, located between two brasanche' s of the fault . lajeetian of "stag and extraction of oil in the oil-boating strata will not have a significant effect on the quality of groundwater because , the water currently is not usable for other domestic or industrial 'Utfs . (page .4-12) . 1h1Vtb6rMoro, the 'stater pipellas will be monitored with automatic shut pressure seasors so that any sudden pressure drop still triggor an alarm and shut dmm the transfer pumps. This still ensues that any release of water is minimal . The development of the water Pipeline *Ould not have any significant unavoidable adverse impacts on water quality. The SEtl 4000 not 6dress the impacts aansaociated with the construction of a gas pipeline of the Chevron facility. As desc-ril undet No. 3 above, there Could be Significant impacts as i ated with construction of the pipeline as well so the public safety iNV&cta associated with a potential pipeline rupture. ( 144ad-3) ,NET— ELF . ;ra h sttI $ eSM as U1 !►sets earl some adrerso a avironaerntal Bc a nueaber of alterDd rep "aid mitigate seta la owl ,i�f tion, "Iles resulting in the potont�81 for s d hm r�1�io to order to &V A ?z to ring the potential effects of alternative$. thereby y' f0"NUAp the 09k*Mt to whisk the• Could mitigate i a s, the dl S40 �Mitipa�ioQ seaasures for the pfepp Pro .eat , A ii Bcuss4afi of the positive #rA negative enviromental *hoot$ of alterastivea is set forth in 17 .0 . Areas of controversy area issue$ to be resolved are idontified on page Z . As stated an page fit, those issues are discussed in greater detail in Appendix 6, which includes a complete response to comments submitted by the Concerned Citisens of Huntington Beach following i the notice of preparation for the SHIA. 'raw Draft MIS! fails to address the environmental Issues associat d with the construction of a water pipeline from the Chevron facility to the propos*6 project site. Construction of such a pipeline would Have the potential to create traffic, air quality, noise and public safety impars'61s. that one not addressed in the document . rurthermore, this water quality iarpects ere not addressed should the pipeline rupture during operation. Ago= f � t The route of the pipeline is described on pager IS 04 A 1 r. whlah states that the pipelines will be installed from 00144z ; t .'dt ot, easterly al6nq Clay Avenue to Huntington Street, t hkn, d Ut�e�rly long Huntington Street Pram Clay Avenue to the RI4 y '$%tp 'Ot ,B1p:ring�fieeld Avenue and Huntiwgton Street . page 33 d the ONXxlt stotees that traffic may be disrupted over a short 4t? 'and aims forth mirtigatioet measurees . Theses Mossurees kaw� Abit ' no mot* than one lane of traffic shall bo closed during Ne day, that no lanes shall he closed at night, and that buty intersections shell be either bored or plated over so that traffic Interruptions will be kept to a minimum. sr >, 11P1.6 19.00ts from the construction of the pipeline are do . .*a 31, A backhoe Mould be used during the coeis,truction; o the water pipeline. Double nufflers will be used on backh dre'tiag -thee construction of the water p'pe3liae. Any residual noise impact world not be significant, because it would be te"p,ciraty in nature and would only occur during the day. peside3nts of each block Mould only be affected for approximately one day, hJJC 6§12t_y: The only potential public safety impacts would be either from: the possibility of rupture of they pipeline or from accidents if pedestrians ha•,e access to trenches during tr:e brief periods during which they would be open. please refer to the discussion of Dater Quality, below, for a discussion of the potsibility of irupturee', As stated in the UIR on page 321 no tzernchees will be left open at night, and several hundred feet of (1440d-I) i f T r 1 f r r RFC{j•^,:i ,t jl7 • .y� 1 ' 1i A� u•r��11.n'r ton la tin - Beach !f 1 IJ •1' I COACOYMO Citisaas of Hap►tingto# pooch az* . Nov Ms fr Xv Fattish, Trossuvoir Z: Hurd aston 0466h, CA 02646 rt r' ovalt ruppl otal X%% Nor 0,6-1 ArA 191X No . 04-1 wor of 1 i •i hasfound tho fsiiO t 04 • • ;E 1, UpAinva fails t* % R *flat BIN iftatif icati4n 4e •iis1"STIvel1 t 21,10u ; ,„ ':;_ �• ss pas rM i ►i t f y�riw.r Ms# #9 x '' fir D ' f i'ixlA tw I Ct�F'" �►e �� i i t>w Pigaif ivaRk e�tt-0 /fit i 90ftb to OW text of tho XtX# In 4044INWt sour0 t hStUX Of 1:M0 Cat b8f 6t4t4k4 tUt AI W000t Of iMPSOM 40t i Oaktif ed in tbo test could 'Cue, or that so" 1440to Svp "ro Meant flaw is ststo is tho text of ths 5-1R. ' roopo"44e to t tents a"re" toss issaos is $*tail , To spoorI ,# h+ vor; the 000mats do not idastitx Say rAW 1XV440 rrqui tr ing inclusion In the SUM SKY $option o1 the UM Tho ftwory clearly mots faxtb mitigation aeax;A res wb;,ch vouW roftas 4110ilievat eftoctp of the grojeat to tho 44tept footibie • The S+vm+ssi► is not roqutrsd to disCUss *Xt#rn4t1yas, GWLCA#t tO tb►s est*rat Met alternstivea axo Si SCUS 44 i* ew#iueti ap M*tho44 Of Mitigating 1Wpscts , in tbo coos 99 tbo olteratives to the Project, � havower s,., t sit*-snst ives genor a l iy would b.sve s positive y! 4 tS 1, a y, $ , I � '!M STWAO CM x 0muftSTO AT OR CAUFMIA an . of MUM O "A � 8� 1in soar Aa wrs AV ox Tw max. ik WMIU, the 80ringfieid Oil Recovery P toloct's rslatod ontitloostip, and Supplemental Rnvivoraayntal Impact Report Igo. 68-1 how* bmw vfopsvptj Wd MW 9 act steport Xo. 88-1 was 'adopted and r , corafted -by t'h a 0,1"Opaq I�Oiaft on x0vtombor 3,0 1POS 4X4 City email an, 6atobet 20. 1986; and O 0i%7 of MuntinOton Reach *am the load agernor is the vrbo tafkAon of the Pupplamaat el and original Rnwilronserental Impact and agencies wishing to respond to notice 4uXy fiv+ ho" "*�4 by the Planning Commisslon either through Writteknot490 4r 4o rinq a publics hearing on October lf, 1904. and audh 44dpoodea and componts as were made were duly noted and resood6d too , AlS±YORgo 82 IT RRSOLVID by the Planriing Commi.exion of tho City of "Untington Reach as follown , f 11,• i.l .uYII. r •lf,: r 1 r ?be pJAINJ" Can'sSiack dens berms !iAd that L , '• : ' � , 1► :, ram a. r pt Est not $$-1 *bd ftNirenarantsl lied in clip with the , :. , ssa ,ti w ► 1itir t a04 •11 atat as l wl • ' 'tbo planning Catirission has considered all y Yf:A tolled in Supplaswntal llarriroesrsntal impact Report , ' dd'o a d impact Report No. 85-1, together wtth existing and proposed measures to mitigate such significant �f bffoctC (2zhibit A) B TI0w 3 . Tht Planning Cotamission further finds that 1, thr,*ugbt trio implantation of the aforementioned mitigation urli►g tom'. �M 1�rit of the otantiall adverse i acts ]f' Y �r, rr g is . , . with the 00tingnald 01,1 Recovery project con bb 31 Oltminatod or reduced to a level of insignificance, r . . ffecii(* 4 . The Planning Comsissfon f inds that the benents adatuibd to the city* both dconomicaliy and soeianr# by virtue of the consolidation of existing oil producing operations to a 'piligle :q�tto a ndanmnt to modern standards of Ufty existing z; wells 4nd replacesont to modern standards of existing tanks ovarridel the udmitlgatable effects detailed lra Supplemental Invirc;nmi ital impact Report No. $$-I and Environmental impact No . dd-1 and the attached statement of overriding considerations (Sthibit ri) . rJ' ..Z_ (1443d) .,,rr 6` LL IV •T r' •yi ,y 5rA I 1 • w 1a Y r MAMW JY , '' .' •Irk .I. {'44jr1 pti sn�",l i r r qn Mosaing 00MINPION of the City of77 A •X 'j pow 040ft 4nd CeIrtify as 046quate „ ► �P"W t wooI boat **tort Ib* 28-3 Ajhd adopt and I4M&L*mw*t* Mvirottt8�. I •Ct Report Ito. 2e-1 and .41 ,t K' 1 that iba MY Caunri 1 adopt and certify an adequate }• A ftTItoMMUtai tapadt Report No. 68-1 and adopt and : r Marti Per 60 44 ate 00vironmental Impact Ile art No . 06-1 . :, p ' ID Planning C h i�� � � � the ann 9 ti�ra�vA o� the City , Ot at • regular meeting thereon hold on ``'`,�, ::, �► ' 1988, by the Following roll call !! r '.', Jai - • • sr � Victor Lelpaato 4014 secretary Planning Camiaaion daLraaa It t { -3- (14434) � F�~ ''��ni a fir:'•*��•�'�� �� � � � � � �� 1 � u d, r L 'dye ova .14 FINDINZ01P ram' IN $U"MT OF IPZ1DXNQB REGMING TIM F t CORPOR 1Trov u A r d 1'' 1 �r 'r • •��' Sri��,�, '„►,'�C�'"b y+���'Y`y�..!���1 .��� � � � � � � , � � � 5 F� ��'��,���rat' t•�1V' �r � ., � � � N >�•, i It. ,� 1 , "� 4Girrt, ,r r�er'1 A 4, '1 rf I.• tzk. AAA • , 1 ,Y•1y ' 1 ryry �� �I�Y�uI��,�•I �frd•ti..•�••�',��,�•��1•,p`I�•�h ����1� '� ��•�' � � �al��r 1 � � ,1 1• •� !.��,1`� �' � '+,��p" ..��.� 1 q f• irk' � 445 1. 1' + 1,;J,�,•,,.,,, l / VpSi health and S r, 5 AU xm Cm "TXD Teo I topo rap , tolls and Coola�r 1.1 Widrolftfs ftainaze and WOO Quality � • • 2. � ���aloS�� SOt�t�e� it ' I 3A Amehael ical/Paleontological Resources 12 ��a •Y ya3``1; ' ,,3 . r oa�In$ and O era►l Plain x . 1 .1 TVAOIC CITICTtiatiot► 31 Qiml!ty and Odors 24 k: lSe lb , 2+ 10. it'sek of Upwet/Sealth and Safety 29 2 , Yl Public Services and vtilitteo 33 2 . 12 Znczgy Conservation 36 1 . 13 Growth Inducing impact• 36 11'�� VIA ,TJ- • a' y, I`w r tit ,r• r � . • 1" n 2.14 Cowlative Za acts 37 3 . 1r1m4i*" Ampediss 44tsr tiv es 41 'r , Oft AXte tnat i V4 41 3s3, 1�► i i� i s sees 43 w , y== , 3A I d t of Al Oil PrOuction Sites 44 3 .5 A4ternative Sites : Parcel 1 45 S.G 1 , De"topme tt", ftly 46 3 :7 Alternative Sites : Porce1 2 47 N, 368 Alternative Sites : Parcel 3 48 3 .9 Alternative Sites : Parcel 4 49 3. 10 tV4 "ity Residential Project so 1 r • ''.' ; "gib.�;'' / ref, y, K, �ar • . NAlim 'r •.fit, 1, k �' FAMS NO on e WAOMOA r tV` ►' SDI . . 1 Ri � r •\ ul V 1 1 r "41 State fufietime ("W441int+11') pro"& toed �ug$Uont to the faxifidiMie XAVitot trtax quality k �� ) ytro�►fd+or ` (a) bl it agirmy stall a Ito" or catty, • mt a 94 -t fot. �rbicb *a UK I boon to Wleted. which Ito 'ties putt or more gross IficAnt o ilt eatal ` Gfr$4t�r•:.*Ot t ho project the Vabli e agency "1000 dam• qr Mgt Writ " tio,4i o toteo Of a ' Otto of gpr sod ► a brief 1�;od d tha raticeals tot O&ch liading The yossible findiaie Mre: (1) C sit of or alterations have boon r• eised � in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid of enbstastia.11y► lesson tho aijaiticastt onviromestal effects an ideatiftee in the final ZZR. (1) Mock changes or 81taratious are Witbia the responsibility amid Jmrisdictien of arrc►thot ft b c agency the, �ency ■aki the Was. Sato. chasses have be" *40 �r b other ap r or ama AM abotid be t,,•.� adopted by rash other asenty. Vne ob- All ka arra t d) ALA 1 (3) Specific economics MOCial. or Othli considerations take infeasible the aitigation atamures or Project alteratives Identified iu the final EZR. (ftidelinesr dectiou 15091 . ) ' I J S• LL a , Mull ba e f rtrad to „a The i WL AMUta1 Upact ROPOCt V A21") for the oil aaccvtry p rojutt (I fir ct") . . Osopolei'i b �v rr.. x _ _ # (' :*t li��icant,�, rdtili � >. ttt o t to # o it t Which may occur as tImpil't, of. the -ro ect of thti Attacbrmt 494titieli the eimm it o xti *aya eeffect$ of the Proect wbich coat to�ieibly be �lated to a IMMI of eripi ia'anca. Saltidit 2 •et$ fatty potential i* ratoi %offoct• o the Project which �►te not bIcaust Of the doesip at tke Project or which c "0 hx' bi bstilatod to a level of insignificance. Sinwatizes the olternotival di*cl►eiad in the coorists of a Statesent of Ovetridi pr id,t �� a V41cb sets forth the . M �r Spetific i i that the bowie it• q! the Project ,i r " 'ble OwItampental effects. %e set fort'a ih snub a ctf end ate r findirms of f fee oe"41iobeo to the �ya{7{�_ "T �J 1• . ����• Y .�,��� .'gyp � ;�'•� y,�.° i 4 1 2 . 1 y ' Y 1a 1 M e• films, U-MV The City has determined that ZZR mitigation' Trear* and proposale ir+cluded as part of the Project ireit iia a stautial mitigationof tbt follow:nR 4co bet that , these affects eamot feasibly be sitilat;d to a Level of iasipnif i cede . Ufa= The neighborhood . *OUINdi!� t ]Project Site consists of Sodium a.eneity ' te►1de'b'ti 12800 9 pt*doeivantly in small Wto unit) llev*lopswmh A and ei le family residences. Viers of the Project Site from a.8 of residences will consist of the Creenin loch wall and landscaping . busing the initial , lee drill tits will: be visible. hurinp the ' t ult Dam injection phases$ to prary drill tilts will ' oiMd periodic&, ly for maintenance and will be visible ` moo adjacent residents . Tanks will be visible above the • The City hereby makes fiadix&e (1) and N. • The following 1i ►d *if 'All revolt a enbstaat al redOetion of the advsrse Impacts of the identified signifieW often . (a) �fte Project shall comply with the landscaping 1rqMsOk4 of Chapter 15. 22 of the ftatington peach t6. ri .All tteses shall be a minima CO A -inch bw s crd so wove than 20 foot 'Oft efttdt j( i Lhdec�yi" and the r tructigo Ot "Sonry b 118 d tt"t i ►/� WVat ss shalloccurc se t •, 1 ,T&064 and consteruction. (4) Voll service rito shall be o"rated no more two d yeart t►ad no spate than 4 well service tl , e e4 trite , at any on* tire. These service till sham nat 09WOM ''120 feet In height. W Drilling derricks shall not exceed its feet in heist . ccssplation of initial drilli of Injection awJ Otodttek wells , all d*ill'ng rigs chat be rived fcen the Bite., y N f YT, 4•i '.1T•'r J�_{ (� The enclosure of both porcels of tube Project Site Vill rtaft of Wptt rsat attitoti of visual �s►Cts . hift6009194 the drill sits - Vic ah acoustical I W411. provide a Boss aesthetic vie"hod . .fir tbt i ritia doll# ►sus.. d iI "p t�l►�i d#i t s�$i s�1, bar Hsu rsoanded an c * Y . tt inns of tcl r rl� will; bd , (b) The Fact# In: ftpVtt of Irinding 1. 61 addressing 14 late , b*;e'by are incorporated by reference. 6 jPzar jest re ices the darilti� a! J0 to 45 b* the doll si `: he#es well shall U lociud z; the pemtd and landseaped drill site iod the yells t co&nCealed from vier, 10 tor*a of the �`aC3.1it ,,site trould be t is wlMitir7 a reduce the he! (h) esre eit3gation neasures inaluied wiihli , the ; proj sip inosid by the goo Potion W11 he atftbotic 1srpacts of the Ito Nonetheless* the Project will result in a cue ; veto" lxca adjacent residences.y because oftt the Th a f sound pia # walla 6a7rf�t t, itb. This is an Ona"idabte td9tes, .��rpact A AM . 1 Under ,�► fit, . o rio. WO d �M11 6 t are i' l �wid the to aii sat r d 'vithe~tt stltt �fe e# 11#, t rs ' „ AV-*I delfood In the. s Olgv for as 1:10►,0►00 to 1:l� 00 ae t�la� an effeatini y ., k im .s t the The City borobp iiiis f indtngt .., ' l) shd ftg followi noikouires will result n the s0staut al reduttion oft e 44"ne impacts of the identified significant effect : (, ), ti facilities will bo loured • to six to et *low► the ' 14ve of the outrounding streets . This Treasure, coupled with tiro eight-loot petimatet Mali. � win k, nod K nub t7 I 1 1 „ voty i� ills '.,�y reduce any ,radiant beat kasard fo ,XrN ahi.h in calculated aeinb no 900t6imoat Aatowr 0). Oil will be rbipped on a contlnaoar M119 , 4MWo q only a SWURI aooaat of oil will be T"ai rod 1 1�d � tbo 't i. Ce�y tbtoo o0a $it• mdo oil a k `• Witted I Masao t $hall nowt be,r; �y .C1I at ter. (0 prior to. the - Wawo of buil44 vomit a r �'41 ty r y 4tlo�a tan CAA ) Iha l b r trod : �' W,, A c lotod b"sd on ap-b r t aa• ' tha11' t-4 a tied •ulrraittol prior to tho start of oil codaction ophratio" . fto W $hall ixexudo ow ages re►ini OW proctice o bw spill • Coto streets f log f e W"14 be bahatode the safe Lin of �► cbical+r ore+d,ICo watssalr i a fullvrwlsd a of ai r sad wat"wr i t. A copy 04211 be oo file r a Of y �ito �rtllMSt an atod dwe tivo addition a mill ptev"t iit sod o� 001 d a Coo to"Wa►ft ras VIM is cowlima with City r irra�ato for li0 of rpilla, etc. e not oth�e�twiro sod is the t •hail be l+r Ad MW Mod with tho tior t6 tha start of oil production o eratl0m v ys'cte in lim rt of yindiaS 1, il.l. relating� .. - to tit Ffe" t ion/lproutt toil bareby ass i4corporatod by 41 e) Al the likolihool of this coact 06earrin r rrr a 0 it it did roar , t, Ito wnld be r. setoto f it is a"Worad . � twocant a 1 , . M It o» o�#�t o aye � �,0 or s, for a Or SCSI* oacues oltkto aiooatrr is re o etaru in the y t Aron. j +a s of tlur+rb fro sat Mar,Uost wmid ° d ' fbe City boroby r f ind i (1) and folUming .oaouror w 11 rt�p*ttlt n a --U14-tantlift tatustioa of tbo A406r i"aats of tha idontiliod oiSpff ilco t ofract . s . l' W/J L 1 I,T,'•1 A The Project enginserins will revent tho well m callari free being daged , even in an ft I earthquake (b) Oil will be shipped on a continuous basis , so that, a of the tars to the oil storages area will never # at tAe s time, only three on-site etude oil ;��►se fitted and these tasho shall newer be t Aso et Once. The oil storage aroa i• . 1acated seta foot below made, and the area to surrounded by '> reiOor eeacrete retaining wails. The volme of this ; feteinis� baste eeareeeder eta Uniformfire bode, tv Sion of ail 11 Gee reguirimento. by a factor of green f the reta xtg wall is rte ured , the retaining`' t+ hold oil released by tans which burst or (t) The facility would shut down tinder a 'If ai.7,-oafe11 *YatesN$ an 006n as the pore t Ment off du r i ug a "3 o r earthquake. no a w rgency situations would be created r Usti 14"Odiate 'attention by, or an augmentation of , ;, plie fet�r perso�el . + ) ng e'ring soils analysis and fault line in . ti tiq were peerfors�ed to determine if near surface ' i'au) it pseseati within the Drill facility Site Areas . ultaat study concluded that no f ul, s or related � RriLt"100 iftes treat* obset d in the t� ow.A axposures . �Accora i a!i active fault line is not known to be resent w�thin the trench limits . The tault litre 1pvootig4 ion report show that no faults were found . %ough the abowa measures would prevent . the � o aaRt of .au tsxcy situation during an ear4uake of N a'�or' , o"Atfi , no � engineerinb of +other ■i bat ion � measure coin d ,:,d V., damage to the yacility if such a major sari u e rrfda in conjunction with damage that > r to the surrounding atria, this is a ei if41",`,iWavoidable iapact of the Project1 2 } I Ic r.XQ HIM Mi a ` t .; 1 a determined that the folXov'i effects Will out be s-I tticant , for the reasorl stated below. 2.1 MMI a � 2. 1°. Development of the Project j will alter the existing topography a: the Mill Site and yatilitY Sit* . The existing surface of the ground on the 1 1 .4„ r 18 w i fh �'" ti dito will be dgadod &ad 99COMPacted to 100611041Y follow 0 c"touto of tine ob'atti kr• tl or►lt e>r to 03 p�' optimi� • foot �o It t t ifod to etr at�ta+e o 1 rso n rt a "ii tore . 'the of t r�roilit t� Witt be t Nod t below tf Meet otevot o -a tb• '.? W42tt"a" toot �o�4w Mooed Mot V60 0�1 tt t corset , is *root to $mat Of the 460 o. M. W , 'fir city hereby r ginding C i f l f4 oot tits $urgently oot►tiot• of ii4► �11cm MViC Aso veolat "Co tot MOO o f totiiitios sd volt e , foeoa or oo of tom' atrolr are o�:od with it o: idol from trot oo40firaotion *ativP Y fteoo'ta tbo suli-tiod r ophy of #10 . ogt ,ito is dfrtotbari $ ad oovotsd Wi.t�ier oftto * of *at$ of pgoing oto aft $&piti000t� (b The rurfac� ou bar restoresof the ad 99 the trod is tits etas, prior to tormigsti of 0i eix ra . on a toe •hatt bo submitted tot a Eon � roolo a� i of t fire Popx t SWMvei0 t to v ..' �at+ ohowing bog the Otto will bo �! t 0 to its cW001t mAtural /tato f (a) All 1001• o r aside viW4 tho gmd&$ lose low x o0 odYi�ou the t'soixlt tide riotedo roplalood as t tod tilt, ImmG arrest tow the well ttlorl 03 t1e mall tit i 04L. be �►rreah4►ated o wirriMr of two toot verrt�to11, three . # x oad to laced o k" �I F i it►hrr�aa�►treo A be. rt w"d eod ' oorwt+�tod t�t�. it i. '. mango All zo s Low •net s srobeige a Me "a rod la t o mm oaoerh oroot with ,o lio t sorrotetiog W the Uuitl of the ,. "k Irrisid Acawdime to this umt �t tit at ioo 9 � o o��oYo tbe ou"idonco in tbe h0vot Am i prof ��,t .eel !o t r iod t o7i t11t+Do6b to i. le"f reo S"tw- true of Subsideff's Fos Pose it ��rtd�oe It+l►1►tti► �o.of Ue City hereby rye lim4inx (t) 7 . tpr,• 1 , 7 r a) Several reports indicate that the rats of labsid*nce hat decreased since water flooding of oil t: ro ac. soots was initiated in 1959. The Divi t ion of kd 1979) ire its that the wtisaue raoorded rate r 0 *apt 0. 1 f"t per year Isom 1955 to 19681 r e to 0.05 test per year from 1964 to 1972 . (b) 8Wotiencs in other oil fialds , such an Milani tow, shows that repressurisatice of the oil is produel I soave throush water injection has caused reduced sates a subsidence and often boo compietety halted subs ide►ace and Oven caused from rebound. Based cm the studies by the Division of mil and sspporle ice iw Wilmington, cited abovel the .t4Lt#fb of the PtOJ Oct will tkot fntr®ase 0 aid should reduce the rate of subsidence, in 0i AM. 2 .1.1 zattattal, Alt& In . three cac*es , oil field ,. et, t a #s of other fluid injection activities have been iOi� d a6 selatl to Induced seisAi s ,veeteAts . In ton pier, California, several suall , � educed martb�t e►kewt occur �B � tored. In that V. S. l ` Vftstaln ArsenalColorado amias of earthquakes w4se`' SUM by fluid a*las t in a liquid waste disposal �... pto Oct. In on oil reservoir at " *1y fiend , Colorado, � x.. .,: motion operations resulted in induced seismic The City hereby makes fi.ndinS (1) . 00 a Ot the above situations is likely to occur at the pappmbsod site . The Project is A. water 1a%Js Ctioa t Oct,,, which Will net cause subsidence . The fasts in s " . IP1041ra 2 . 1 .2 hereby are incorporated by "e Mountain Ar esnal, and 1las Oly s to Colorado occ.9tred is hard bsittlo ruck. t it', i6610itfcally. diffetent ftom the Yount itd td of the Los Anteles basin. (c 0 Micro-*attNuake poiaitoiring s►ystwr o , designed to accurately locate sstsal,l , shallow oarthquakos tba►t .uibht be enetated 'ay oil operations , have been in operation about 1 yetrs in the vicinity of Indlewool and Wilmington oil B. a oY•`w i 4 . Ir F, have been located in either field P, fields . No earthquakes ha in b fields , that would indicate oil operations to a cousat ve factor . � . 2,2 him OUALITT, Stom water ruff w4ll be h incxodr" ' OO. to ti permeable land surface will _ be ddcretood by ' e*ro*finet2y three acres 4. lead , resultiVA from the Paving at the project Site with . asphalt .' • The City hereby des funding M . EMU U-1,1620st Of yindina The Increase in storm Crater from paving the Site gill not have negative Impacts on the . 0. 6 drain system because the Project Isms been t to utilize all on-site storm water runaft four V* Ujdction purposes. (b The construction of now half-section streets with c Is corb , and utter will alleviate the present water pa � JP�nblfts along that City right-of-way. .:J. ' 0 Surface drainage, including storm grater , rni the hr.11 O ft.4 shall be diverted to catch bar ins , then bY *T low aria underground pipeline across the street tk% :, 4lity Site, The water will be collected in s&ad � qr Po., 1 aid then pwrped into the water . A .64 0 f i ltored Aftd sized with ties pr uct ion ` Otte,4 iBto the ihil t�eari a ae , It of iisteflot of the aeilityr h to Will , aspUlt o'11er a sack Use and the I be me wd with ctush*d roe&. The stors� rsatot and surface drainage will r% t the soil thrcap the ormbod. rmk, "tot sad sasfice dta41&a 0, •*11 bo ,fir o#tt °` di e, divo�rtod to tho saw i Sad then follow the same process as water ? dt ► b►t i 11 bite. ' d)' It the &Vsnt of a I tailor* fttia a 100- ear t , an Isency vaxve tasid be, opened on a Fatcility storm -water m2d be. directed via gravity tl line to Voll C011kre A OW a. When OW cellars AirerMalli filed, water Mill flog to a Hero!- stage oldices ton, it uscessary, aria fiveline to the County dr Aidla 34 Molaware Street. Celags A and B have been Opetif i•cally enpiawed to perform as additional 4• r �`•'.'�' �� I� . ., ter fir, :• 1 y , I r, clarifiers for tbi* emergency use . AWAL . . 2 : The originAl 211 staiVed thi tea* or e- UP xatr�rwould b0 released to the * t l is 64 l ,et the case w r � . sot r 446d to tbtd , sanitary *ewer the City hereby makes finding (1) . r f , �;_'' <h) 1�►ll• seater:.,nee for In into the underground oil reservoirs will be obtained from the following sources : store watmt ruzioff ; rofteed grater ft4o a roduction wells; wad na"e-tt Vine water (waiter to i* ti .1 till the jiWesligoand reservoirs) purchased from t�s JOA. At., ""t Chevron V.S.A. is treating sad am� 0 brine waiter into the s ita�t $ever g fir brine water for is,J0ction "tposes 911 isitiall toduts the ozistink load On the 6041tasy •fir syitem ly aipprozinately 309000 bar:ols per daY'. (b) All Was rodai�ed with the oil will nordiAll be cleaned by circulation through sand f 11tots wad tt�i� : tale *ad will theta ba reinjected into the forAatioul . fit) 10 • the evert of a coaplete electrical failure, 911 1 'Written evils will o down, and there will bu 'no fadln�cud` M�M►'�a. The flow of -up water will be stopped a e. : �►6 � The water filtration systea will iatltide f eepr y rto. allow for continued ention Wing ' ,.ice or �repaitt . 1! 1► l+f�sr . ri�d "* revai r* air to ropluce . t -uS► vat " ' refaced and/or w rtial Oct of biigh 10et ittoductica wells will be isplftfttodqk ` The drilliag of the yells lour r+ aril ia" �r'+� trating b�ott shallow wad deep t b a �aiferd to min acc�ir� to oil••b"0 laysss tlt nt in potential a+dverire effects 'ova : The City hereby sakes finding (1) . t: The followins ;. Msasur" will ■itipati the 14antified Impact to a level of { lari�nilxeance. (a) The water found in the shag low and. deep StoundwItter acquilers in , for the most part , brackish. 10, I ' i 1 y. r , n OEM r able crater has been extracted from acgqI if Its in the 00 lkao etee, 41 hay b US#441l only i arias east z . tt- leMpod alai The Vro eat site is vast 'AM !en t and low is factt located be votow two Wncbes %+; d pC 4� � hater end exte et ! ► 1� t ► not � a► d alcasrt r � ae�. vote . (b) State Division oil and Gas Regulations require tbat the bast of all froils cuter sands that are penetrated be protected from . # water inva0ou from below by ce"Wtins . The VIV16 inn of oil and Gas will require that ` whtft test be peallowed to assure proper seals were hod , The Use Petnit teSnl:es that pipit srtri cAextiqg thro ah trtdb vaer-bearing sands s ll 10614meated to , pre"sit saltwater intruslon into the � tifees�. c) During drilling oporatl , the drilling fluid Ubi►el it cistculated. 4a 1hi well board to rewove cuttings laasur a ambrane atm ad the bore bole wall and inhibits water infiltration Into the forr4tions which have been rr*6040d o ' e nea► of water is filtrat$on Bros, the ill$as slid is usually so more than a few fast In 2. 2 .e ,� �ur-np water will be trans rt to the pre oft site t9irct a pipeline. It the y elute ruptu red. brino e0bld be released , The City hereby rakes fiadlnq M . faun not i.; st Al jtjA no fallow! 'Vto ss ■!t Gate ea impact to • 1001 of � a'lccsr. The aster pii1 will be bgtled �t 30*owl M 0 belay tie t1root surface ' red �t' t t Of the pipe. y r 11 is ads t rt d"ter outface aid will not +show—G rJL tatr ate► aisloee "tot . (b) thw pipeline will be monitored with autocratic 'elartdow pressure sensors so that any o►adden proomte drop ell ul er an alam and shut damn the traesfer p rpN N . Mis wil lasur�e that any role"* of Wator is Mrin at . -,S aim to) fact a) in Support of finding 2 . 2. 3. relating to in tba AVO&I herfi ft is 1Iroundwater ference. r The d"610 t of a rii f tbo Frojeat Site will destroY joy q n of on the pro oot Site#, The City hereby MAUS finding (1) . , :r Y rj • (a) The Vtolset Site to dUrrently dieraptdd, ooat4tninp piles of dirt fraar earlier construction activities . 146 tolt•ivated or native species 4xist on the site, s:cept for *esdy plants LuWscapi N 11 ,toplace x9tionAL1 lost during trading and a d odditional (b) So t4voe or dangsted species are kam or 1 ectod to brircd ! t c praJOct Site. f. 4. Z . 4. l The padia of the project Site a1 excayst oA tot foundatiow an vet! callats will distoO undise.0" red •arehaeoloSical arm palsonto to.al resotc�raos . e City hersoy makes findin (1) . is little liitdlil UM . 49 "andiscovex twoo�t�r�t the projett Site , The � 9tity of the: �k4own arc :d ws in .the City are located aloes he bl of the Santa Arles ate.� Can,. atr +ri uvrtibl" 0. G &a I milt $0 Yflat tM P}+�, ate. s - ( ►� x ,., *is gadi and �tavation, earth movi ws cre 0411 v ..ti , din .Rpoil• for potettial 4rcbaeological f luds.. Io tba swont of a tentsol fia4 beinglocated , 0441 IM dus — d until, the �rfp stance of t� * dettvainod , rra ppto j ett will be G ditioned thteup the pee Perarit to follow specified procedares in tIh4 rrdtt that remains are located. 12. ih'yyy i J ltwn, 1 1 y 9 21 47 1" I♦' . 'I2 .5 AW ' s T40 1ect to tur reedy is : � $to1�Tm vlaa'� n3 Vitt 2) , ehi Mritb fir• . 1 tbd d #off * "Off �il Vistriet robi'b to 4 1 tv r. x v�ri► �, die Oity %4*6tiy MAL E In f Suagmt dig ���d iet■ � I ' C"e provides for the eatabtie tt of ' 1101#9 artrietts. "WICAW .SWOUP—M for .sv . a 0a ietrict is that of a x ei� surface area (200 lwbt ` . 110 feet) 'Pao lied WU .. !d!2J. Thf, Ps"Osed drill rite for t: it.. c- W *fix Eaton t .tie 0#ei die u rse fted by dot ,4 . 9�d2+� s ������'� It is cotleieteat wi i this P ravI S Ca. (0) , Jectiea 96d2.2 re uirMs, dedication, or are i t ra�rxe of et I in4tlon g of ail areal sOp+tst .thAt lic VW"'City SLIM Re of it" euvets�esvio* to lines or toywwnt• A21 Citi►Msr WO dedications will be �srYe�reottd ' thr��db the t)=. '�f recasded tract UkRE for the Ptoject retie. Thesetoee; the '1190ject -it acs , t at;,e th this jp tpyieion. „ `; � ;E( Sd►r I1 F.� k, t 1.j slit ioul WoiY to Immigt t "With to& rx '+• the viiiialyian. " kr� tr e Tm City km*)p►. eAtr lilwi 9, . 2oil�rif�,,P6kt�iet °" rn1 Vian fly The P#wj o 1e ,2"j i Rest with t: re10OH41-60117% a t x (x) 29a A.: aA ,,gin ASC Ue �. Oil t A ,, 8ee41 &#A xPitor ,, as of +Pr 0*6 oil Tka Fro+ect will t"WVr oil P adncia2 rati,2.itien frm d altea, theraby p+eraitting the ronoration of ail rite$ 15 1 I �f I r x,:atti�,red over 160 Acres . Although oil producing facilities will remain on the Project site , the Appearance of the Project wite will be improved over its present condition . Thereloss , the Project in (--Vusiptent with this : clicy. 'igva�s��2..:1y IIxiorLZX_Dos A&AA011Z "Oil Production Areas" are included in "Third Priority Areas , " defined an "areas conWain valuable &state (not of ",eso significance) which sbould be incorporated into a comprehensive Open Space and Conservation program. The Project site is not included in any adopted Open Space or Conservation Progran . i IlMinera,l Resourcee" are listed as * "Second Priority Areas , " accompan.ted by a policy to lencourage utilization of mineral wealth, prevent blight , pollution, and undue destruction of natural features . " The Project will use secondary recovery techniques to iucresase the efficiency of oil todu�ction . As conditioned and ■itig+ated , the project will not add to blight or pollution. Therefore, the Project is Consistent with this policy. 1 L1ia UAC.l�.. nd „ConseTy o lam,".: "The plan encoispaeses all tscisting cud planned open space and j conserwhtion prograns as well an several additional projects . " (General Plan at p. 16 . ) i No yen space develo►pmentsi , opera space planareas, or scer. corridors are deli noted a . the Project Site or within the subsurface Pro ect Area. The MCC&:len Park sitep thn nearest identif led site , is two blocks to the north of ,tha rite. Iriglue ZLead - MJA=d The Project site i s � located n Zone Cb � Lutsral Irlooding-11 'Therefore , thv Project is nvt in a flood hazard area . 1 ''COIAtinu' to requite geologic invust ipat caas of all e i gni f i cant divelapaseant projects and to 01`ti,vulate by Canerions of ApproVal thAt 9.11 co traction within those projects be dersignet to wi g predicted probable ground auction mctelerationd ." 14. { Project rtructures will be designed to withstand predicted probable grcnind no" " on ar;celerat i oaa . Therefore, the project is consiste, Faith thin policy . (c ) B -7il grit Sake-WL..2 , a' sl.&LL "Coal : To reduce to acceptable levels the degree of noise exposure from all transportation , stationary and other nuisance sources in the cm6nurity to insure the pur11c :health, safety,, and welfare . " S cti,on , 1 .3 .2. '7,J1 "Objective : To mimimi,;e external noisee and pre: ,nt the* .from penetrating existing quieter "'Policy: The us:i of quieter auto- Mobiles , r.achinery and equipment should be encouraged . " ft,GtJgn_kJ_JA_ �..�l�i .3•e' eia : "The optimum noise , level for ail;- residential uses in LUTE 60 for outdoors (approximately equivalent to CIZL 60; and Ldn 45 !or indoor$ . " The Ptoject will be conditioned , tbrou&YA the CUV, to exceed the re uirssents of the Cit3• Noise code. ` erefore, the Project is consistent with these policies . JOB "Consider rertricting now residen-tial development within 15 feet of an electric motor--driven per. Although this section Is not directlLf?di plicable to the � project, it implies ust a25�-moot RtACM14i exist between pumps and residential areas , The pur on the project eit+e will be in excess of 100 feet from the � nearsat 'ireeidantial unit . Thereto:e, the project is consistent with this policy. Ad& AMR F& pus IU "rigure 1-� 3 shrnrs thsr existing' 04 proposed P rka at ultimattet devviorwat . The Project will not adversely Went 09 prerclude ' tho t of xw recreation tacuity shown in Tigure .�M Wows' :,it to cessistont with ripre 2006 �g ISO a . lS 4 _... . ]►.i "Goal : To provide a multi-swede transportation system that ensures the safe and efficient movement of ptnple and goodr , " The Protect will not cause or result in significant traffic increatea . It will only rewire three truck trips per day, which is too low in volume to create a ti significant adveRrse impact to safety. Therefore, the Project is consistent with tole policy. Ac tion 3 . 1. Z,2 . 5 : ,Fol icy : rrovide adequate true: and ► rail, service to industrial and comaoerical areas w:iile providing minis= disturbance to residentlal areas . ,, Project truck routes bave been planned to minimize disruption to surrounding residential areas . Therefore , the Project is conai.sten►t with this policy. no olicies in the Scenic Highways Slement apply to the Protect . Cg? xM,ing I So �ctian 3y;�,, ,�,. ,;. "Action: Monitor changes in industrial and comer:ial land uses to assess heir impact on residential land use . " The ]SCR discussion of growth- inducing impacts describes the effect that the Project will have on residential development , as well as the impact on further residential development it the Project in not approved . Therefore , the City• review of the Project compl i e! with thi a policy. Sact�ian , � 1= "Action: Review all changes in planned land uses to determine the cumulative impacts on comunity facilities . ,, The ZIR diacusr:ion of euusulative impacts describes the PxoJect 1 s cumulative impacts on V-003unity facilities . Therefore, the City' s review of tha Ptojw' ct complies with We policy. Sion 3 .. , 2 , a.! "Action: continue to actively eafhree land use crdivrc,%cee." The Vrdjedt will he subject to all City land ,are ot4inamces and re ulatWav , enforced through cimditlanr attachd to the COP. Therefore, too ftoject to consistent ar i tb this Policy. 16 . t • (h) IARd Ug a Eleigent 142A- -IA--ixIJ "To pl-ovide !cr the proper develo rent , maintenance , improvement , preservation , and use o? the City' s natural resources by removing and restoring oil production areas as vells become non-product i ve . '1 The approval of the ?roJ(xt will permit the abandonment and removal of 22 wells , Therefore , the Project is consistent with this ;olicy . a, 3 2 .. .1: 'To provide and saint-iiyr a quality liv n environment so that mesabers of all economic , , sociat, and ethnic groups say reside in 2 ntington beach by providing an adequate level of community services , laci,litiec , improvements , and s►aintemanca in all areas of the City. " I As conditioned and mitigated , the project will increase the quality at &tear surrounding wells to be abandoned , because the appearance of the well sites will be improved and thty could be developed for residential uses . Therefore, the Project is consistent with this policy . %&GI�iam. 3 -J , 2 . 9_i "To seek out and encourage industrial development that will broaden the City's economic bass , that is diversified , that is well related to other land , males, and that provides local job opportunities by: " , nn 3 4 "Locating industrial vises adjacent to cospatible land osas .11 The Project will remove oi.1 producing fmcilities from 6 ' aitft , therraby eliminating potentially i.acompatible land uses from residential areas . Although oil producins facilities will remain on the Project site, t e Project eiife will be improved over its present condition to reduce ox 41isis gas potential land use conflicts with the strt diit$ neighborhood . Overall, the krojoet will rofte.e th# potftttal for land use iacMextib litiee Bross oil developments in residential areas. l'harefore, 3,; . a,s � cpollst.ent with this policy. . "Establishing effective eovi tomental seen a t t rinisise the external effects oft other land ' '':`Obadltlfto and sitigatimst stieamtol i ised 4n the PseJect will WAimisa its external effects min other land 17. rises . The-exore , the Prr)ject is consistent with this policy. Ser,tJOIL . ''Lliminating conflicts between existing induetri&l uses and non -compati:,le uses The Project will remove oil produciAg facilities from 6 sites, thereby eliminating potential incompatible lard uses from residential areas . Although oil, producing facilities will re-Aain on the Project site , the Project site will be improved over its present condition to redued or eliminate potential land use conflicts with the surrounding neighborhood . Overall, the Project will reduce the potential for land uae conflicts from oil developments in residential areas . Therefore, the Project is consistent with this policy. M C nity e'acilit eA SCtigo ... Ali. j. ''Coordinate the installation of cosssunity facilities with street improvement-.a *°bese possible . " The: Project will provide concrete curbs and gutters in conjunction with the construction of half streets . Therefore , the Project to consistent with this policy. (J ) UAltal ZIMr-at Althou h this element addrdsees coastal policies, the follovLug policies relating to energy rosourccs could be applied to developments tbroug,hout the City. 510ctign`_34 6.2 .6 .2: "Encourage they production of enemy resources as efficiently as possible with minimal adverse impacts . ,, The project will use secondary recovery technigzes to increase the effiA-;iancy of oil production. As conjI Toned aemd mitigated , the Project ' s adverse effects will be minimal . Thereforc the Project is consistent with this polity: Bastion "„ 'Incourmge unitization aid ca ilMol a�of exidtine. oil operations . . . to the maxim" esrteit feasible amd legzlAy permissible when such activities (1) reduce the area used for oil fatilitlea , (2) are Oat bore environmentally disruptive than existing artaftner.ts aad (3) do not jeopardise public health, isafsty or welfare. ," 16. 1 M The Project will rnmove oil productut facilities from 6 sit ,ear scattered over a 160-acre area and consolidate ::hem on a 3 . 1 acre vita . This will reduce the area used for oil facilities . The abandonment of existing wells will eliminate potentiallY incompatible land uses from residential areas . Although oil producing facilities will remain on the project site , the Project site will be Improved over ita present condition to reduce or eliminate potential land uke conflicts with the surrounding nei hborhood . An conditioned and miti ated , the Project wi'1 not jeopardize the public haclt , safety , and Welfare . Therefore, the Project is consistent with this r , polic, , section 3 , 6 . 2(d) -, "Utilise the oil suffixes to etisurs that coastal dependent energy extraction is accommodated in .areas designed other thaal resource production, except for eanvi,ronmontally sensitive habitat areas The change of ;:one for the Project will utilise an oil Graff ix to vasure that ernes y extraction is accomodated in en area mot • specifically deasi hated "resource odu C prct ic,n. " 11he Pro3ect Is not located in an euviromentarlly sensitive habitat area . Therefore, the Project In tonsiotent with this policy. SMC11122 , . . . [Consider] lenhancede oil recovery activity and . . . ensure the evaluation of impacts different from those associated with conventional extractiou. " This Z1h discuosed potential impacts of secondary crater tecbniqu,ar which are different from those associated with conventioval extraction (seat e. discussions of subsidences and injection water) . frierefore , the Project Is consistent with this policy . "Promote compatibility of oil and other eanersy-related activities with surrounding uses to the smsfami. extent feasible. " A. include measures such as additional requirements regarding fencing, planting and landscapi % to ensurer aysthe0 c and environwntal compatibilityetween oil activities and other users �• The -Fsoject will comply with Chapter 15.22 of the ,City oil C644 (9t rushing and Lndstr ing) . Thereifore, the Project i "t"Nift"t with this, policy. i (k) ZgnlAr sad�Qener$1 1axLCtaa3,stency � 2uning_._Anfl -end VQa Element 1,1g&t"11i "-0111 rosins in shOVA on the matrix to be compatible with Medium Density Residential . The Project Site will have "-01" zoning . The surrounding naighborhood is designated Medium Density Residential . Therefore, the Project is consistent with the land Use Elesent , as shown by the Matrix. Jgct 4.2.L "A finding of consistency may only be made alter analysis of the proposed soning In terms of all flint elements of the General plan. A finding of consistency with only one of the elements , such as the Land 'use Zlement , is not sufficient for a finding of consistency with the Coneral plan. After considering all nine elements , a finding of consistency with the General Plan may be made for the toning proposal in question if it can be shown to further or possess a measure or significant degree of compatibility with the General Plan policies and Preston This analysiL has ezamined all elements of the General Plan on a poll s-".-by-pol icy basis . The Project will further a nuab if General.. Plan policies and programs , and is consisteYic with the remainder .. Therefore , it is cohaiatent with the General Plan. . With respect to the Land Use Element , the policies have been transit*.ed into a zoning and Land Use Xlement Consistency Matrix which is included as figure M. The Kat,',!ix shows that as a mipceilaneous district -01 may be combined , ' (i . e . , is consistent ) with any land use category.. It is specifically consistent with loint medium and medium-high density residential categories . 2. 5 . 3 'sntL1112 t: The Project will be located in a predominately residential area, which could have adverse land use impacts on surrounding residences . The City hereby ,makes finding, (1) with respect to all laud use impacts *xcept those specifically identified is Section 1 . Ftc.th i,,O,, INDROtt .99_ a'ibdinrts • (a) `nor Project will result in the abandonment or 22 h*" ired W011s over aw 160-acre area. it will also remove I "sriatiat ' to* batteries . TNtetote, the Para act will red�we the number of residences which remain adjecoat to 20. �r I1 I oil-producing uses+ . Currently sore residences are within 14 Brit of existing wells that will be abandoned under the proposed Project . rot example , on the Villas St . Ctoft. site , 5 +opperating velle are �locsted wi -Ahift 20 feet at less of condoain�ium units . 1n total , thersfpre , Project will reduce kind use impacts from oil--producing. uses . gib) The racts in Support of findings 1 . 1 , 2 . 5 . 11 2 . 5 , 2 , 2 . 6 and 2 . 9 hereby art inco rnorated by referents. With the amoption of aesthetic impacts , discussed in Section 1 . 1 , mitigation measures and elements of the Project which will reduce impacts on the environment will also ensure Project compatibility with surrounding uses . ; (c ) Use Permit 86-25 includes conditions Intended +:o amuse that the Project is consietent with the surrounding residential area. 2 . 6 j , AND GIA 2. 6, 1 Potential 1 ems: The drilling phase of the Project will be in operation 24 hours a day-- Ligbtin for laret will be required at night . Some 11ghtiug Wilt be vi.sib a to adjacent reside:.ts and passers-by. : The City hereby wkes finding (1) . J'asJ;x r, Suggest_ gf Ziadinae : The f ollowing measures will mitigate the identified impact to a level of insignificance . (a) Light and glare shall be directed or screened to prevent any direct glare from Project lighting outside it parameter boundaries , (b) No flood lighter shall be used . Li hts will be low profile (i .e. , will iiguC lows valve &at equipment &tear only) . (c) . During drilling, the derrick will be enclosed and j411 AlSbAs�, . except the aircraft waaing, li ht , will be on tho inside of the acoustical blanket . Lilevel �ts around the auxi l l iary equ i ent will be near ground and well below tb top of the 10, acoustical Mall . 1. 7 . 2.7 .1 i wo Dacia$ this drilling use of the Project, 3 heavy xebtcle (truck) trips a day still .be generated by .,the froject. 11 . 1 ii f ,fix : The City hereby MAker finding ; l ) ,Facto in - AURR rt of rind'an ; The following measures will mitiSate the identified impact to a lavel of ins ipiflcance . i (a) Dutin. the drilli% phase, all heavy truck traffic shall to liasited to the followin strasts between the 405 rreeway and the Project site : each Soulevar•d , Adaets Avenue, :and Delaware Street , kntrances to the site shall occur only on Sprintfield Avenue and California Street . There truck routes and accesses w re previewed by City staff and were chosen to reduce impacts on the adjacent local neighborhood . (b) Truck tra►flic shall be limited to the hours of 7 : 00 a .m. and 5 : 00 p .m. E (c) Truck deliveries shall be stagSe.red so that no trucker shall Wait on the street for longer than live mimtes . No trucks shall be permitted to park on the streets . M L;oeal streets affected by truck traffic shall be j inspected before And after construction. Any damage to � local streets by heavy trucks shall be repaired and reconstructed per City requirements at the expense of the project applicant , (s) rt will not be necessary to restrict parking on the side streets to accommodate trucks . Trucks with a twrnfmg radius of 35 feet can easily turn from Springfield Avenue onto Califctaia Street . Curbs will be painted red to prohibit parki?- S for 10 feet on either side of the driveways . M An overloat. ?ermit shall be obtained from the City and State ( if required) for all oversised loads to be moved on public streets . t . 7.Z b'd i;� S Du r i nS the d r i l l'ina and constsucti ap haaees , traffic will increase aaaiaally in the project vicinity. The City hereby mass finding (1) . The following rem. Will witi to the ident f f impacts to a level �iplficarrc• (a) All empioyees shall park on-site . 12 . .r r 1 , 1.1 (b ) Because the Per.a j e-. will pave and add curbs to ' currently unfinished streets , approximately 1 , 700 feet of additional curbside on-street parkin will be made available to area residents by the Fxd�iect. (c ) Joaring tho construction phase , all. truck traffic shall be limited to streets reviewed by the city staff and chosen to reduce impacts on the adjacent local nei hbothood . Entrances to the site shall. occ+%r only or. Sprtngf field Avenue and California► Street and Delaware Street. (d) Truck traf f i c whall be limited to the hours of 7 : 00 a .m. and 5 : 00 p .m. (a) Truck deliveries shall be staggered ao that no trucks shall wait on the street for longer than five minutes . No trucks shall be permitted to park on the attests , (f) Weal streets affected by truck traffic shall be Inspected before and after construction. Any damage to local streato by bear-r trucks shall be repaired and teconstructed per City requirements at the expense of the Project applicant. (g) Additional Project-related traffic - ill be of short durttion and will involve lose traffic than a normal jy 3 construction project, (fix) luring the productionjinjection phase , there will be mo increase in traffic in the Project neighborhood resulting from the Project . 2 . 7. 3 12tsat a IMCL: The water pipeline from the Chevron site will disrupt traffic over a short periad along the follows route: 2rom Golden West Street east alonS Clay Avenue to Huntington Street , them south oolong Runtits toss Street from Clay Avsnue to the facility site at Springfield Avenue and RuAtinSton Street , ZIA - ..: The City hereby makes finding (1) . U(stl AS 699209t CC T� a f0110wis�g Measures V m ti egate t identified impact to levee. of Insignificance . 13 . .s 1 ` r • (a ) No more than one lane of tr&ffio., oball be closed durint the day and no ls,_.es shell be closed a.� might , ,1 (b) Bnry intarsectiona shell be either bored or plated over so that t:ra►if i.c interruptions wrill be kept t.c a► minimum. (c) Several hundred feet of pipeline will be installed , surveyed , inspected and they trench back-filled in one day. Therefore, no one area will be a fiacted throughout the period of construction. i 2 . 8 ,AI�.QUALTJr MM OD 2 . 8 , 1 Fotesntial Effect : Temporary dust: impacts will result from Project construction activities , including the conitruiction of the water pipeline . The City hereby mattes finding ( 1 ) . ZpActa in Suppor . of Finding&; The foliowing measures will mitigate the identified impact to a level of insignificance (a) A dust control program shall be submitted to the De artment of Development Services for review and approval prior to the tasua►nce of building permits . (b) Xxposed dirt areas stall be minimized in thie Project design . Roads and parkin areas shall be paved and other open areas shall be landscaped or covered (with gravel or asphalt) to minimize dust generation, 2.9.2 20tantiAl Effect: Pollutante will be emittted by cdnetroction equipment and by vehicle tripa . The fifty hereby makes- finding (1) . pacts in S.SuPgort..21 inalln2R: (a) During the construction phase, only l? -• 6,wo-w 1LY trips will be generated by the Project. Thirty-two tWp, trips will be !�nerated during the drilli#a +ba a � � se , rfat the in ep*'_'.=,production phase . e Missions from thie. 'unber, of trips to not siinifitsat . 2•8 . ail production facilities . Nt ticularly tanker can be the source of fugitive focarbom mission@ . 24 , �t l 1 .r.r 'Z`ht City makes it�ding C1) . Of (a) As required by the South Coast Air Q1181ity Management District , Project oil handling and ator rQage. tanks will o emissions . system ` 95-98% of hydrocarbon (b) lace 16 existing tanks which The Project will. re are uncontrolled for air. pO 1utAnt emf.esions , ia�rl;adirxg hydrocat=bons . The r epplacement of the 16 to nka will reduce The total estisur�ed emiosions by 24 ,357 pounds per year . 7 now Project tamp with vapor recovery,, emissions Spec ei"f ici.eucy t will. generate 31159 pound 0per year . The total emi es+on recluctio�m will 7� ereductio198 � ir. UMP r year , 55 . 1 pounds per day, Kyledrocarbon emissions . This is the substantia!1 net benefit opt' the project , ' (c) Tvstber hydrocarbon emiseiOn �e othero antiquat d l be achieved through the including nao OU en sum s , oil-wator process equipment , p seg erators and other simil-Ar equipment which is currently uncontrolled fir ait pol1�aca* �s . (d) The immediate neighborhood surrounding the Project site will be � osad to 3 , 159 pounds per year of emissions , or approarimatele exposed per day . The d to twice this amount neighborhood currently is xp becaruve of existing tank batteries located nearby . as production j 2 g. 4 Pa.� �� a i l and g i &Ctivitiea can emit ben:One , a know, carcinogenic air contaminant . yindi.ng&: The City hereby makes finding M - (a) Azk dvAlugat i on of the benslna @Si s s 0 � i i c the �MY be sociated Vith 'the project was condu:t s 1the ulas g�D�tt1! Co#fit Ait t '�ality Management Visttict psnj?o 22 Alt. e13ty %*Pact Analyses) and 14p1 Cgea Source leviow of ftowil and Suspected Carcinogenic Ait iseio�nr �Qntaminant•� . The project 's poteutial bensenw nsi a conservative figure* �ri1l. be .0005'� cubic sreters s r bid o r�iease 131 e w th igitg that require furtbo tic uaxitY an&IY$L@ - 25 . �__.. -- f (b) The Project will el.i,Anate exititing tank#3 that are `otal y uncontrolled fur air, pollutant emiasions , including benzene . Therefore , i roj eCA probably will rewult i.r a net reduction its environnmental ri ,4? from benzene c . ssicns in the Fxoject Ar�:a (e ) South Coast Air Quality Management District a roved vapor recovery systems al.al.l be used for tankp in oil contact . (d ) Low-level , short-•tertA exposure to benzene is not rubjeet to SCAQMD prop►oemi! rules , because such ex 0311res are not thought to constitute a health risk , 1n the even;, of an on- site spill , the system is designed to pump the spilled fluiJ back through the separation system and into f the tank. Spills would be containeO on site . I 2 . 9 1I:E 1 . 9 . 1 goteatiA ,..Ef fact :: Oil well d ill ing and pumping operations , production wastes and earth moving equipment , and repair/maintenance equipment will generate no1se which could affect revidences in the area of the Project . dJUM The City hereby makes finding (1) . ,to In p^Xt. Qf ,.�,�i,nde : The following measu�rea will mitigate the identified impact to a level of insignificance . (at) The project shall fully comply with the Runtington Beach Moire Ordinance (Ardinancs No . 2379) . (b) A report prepared by an - acoustical engineer. certified by the County of Grange shall be submitted to the Director of Development Services for review and aap+lrroval prior to cosssencing drilling . The report shall describe noise levels at the Projact Sito pi. iparty► line and at the nearest residential property linen , both with and without acoustical treatment on the drilling rig and servie.s rigs . The report shell, indicate noise attenuation s 01ares• atessmiary., Co assure compl,lance ,cith the Vio Deadh Boise. Ordinance (OrdinasC a No . 2319) . i include the provisions cf the ordinance reprdin a sumium hau;ly average noise level of 50 da(A) 4*tbq tie hours from 10: 0 P.M. to 1: 00 a.m. (off MmessAys vibratiot, as determined by the Vitector of bve3,3peent Services , shall be iieduced to e��e�t�►ble• levels 26 . 1 " e. . I f 4 (d ) 11uise r ,)zItoTing shall. be I. c~-nduct:ed under the rrupervisi.on of an urouetiral engineer certified by the County c'f O�at�gr bep�rts rriail be 0ttt,mitta-d tr.) the Director of Development Ser races within �_hr. o-e VQr:!4n� days. after tine C�►millet rr df each phave of :h as, ���:c.��_ nC, effort , Th.t, mc'tlita; Ag shall incliide t%e a x��• '_ � to. the start of the drilling phaee , naxse vea3utemeatg shall be obtained dur..r. tube operation -if the specific drilling rig wxi `h has been selected and the measureasaDts sliall to relati!d too those which will be experienced at the riearest "asidential undaries t~o the driliint rite , xn add!,ti0n, th* naiRQ Cor.ntrol measures which bvio bt will be , appl i e!d to the rig P-s neerded for h complianc:e with the Noise Ordinance shall be ideatikied , (2) 5tart__2f il3 as Moi Re weasuzements shall be obtained duving the ni ght c ise hours (10: 00 �, . �I o 7 :00 a.m. ) for at 1ess�t six houru on esc:� of � from the three ni,gh.ts within the five da.yy period. stsrt wr the d*ill`r`g ;phave . l�onitoriag shall occur at the nearest ritidotatial boundary to the actual drilling Ope.ration. The noise level data shall be compared to noise: a le~•relm specified in the Noise OrdtnMce, where act VCC9G4&n("e of the Ordinance ie identified , noise control metpures shall be tggplied apd an additional two ught.c of monitcring shall `,)e ? _ y '' VM. oolse MoAltoring ska1l occar durin a e X-houtr period 'between the � boure from 1,0: 00 p .u, to 700 a.m. &t. least Once each month curing tr data abt��$d oshm ie be project. The !,noise fuvel corparod to tits, n'oine Ordin anef, stsad4rde. Whdra an ' oxce-wdance of the standalcd■ is Identified, a ifs ^,� ttro7� :ral�►sulre�r sh►11 to applied and an sdditi�wr�a1 two nightip of sun i�tot why shall be -required.. t „ tee Truck treitte .*hall be limited to the haUrr betltio :00 a .m. skid 5700 $.S l SO trucks shell k on the 10t v-ect. , lad truck eli,verioll , e0411 be �r agi': a pro that no truck will WaIt - ia► the street ! longer thaaa;. i*ire shall he no eattSUCO O eert o vahiclts 27 . nor ; 1 Vle n j:a of 1.0 OL) 0. and �O :t ;'Al 1.)1 i I t�.F,- P 0 S e filial A r Ll e. -Y tlu M1ot, ell, 1 ? be kept to a pl, pe elevatrr�-;, if neceboary J-V,l tc, ;4Uh;o"':b Oie a,mpact. of Lubulars being I 011e-k I'Ale ilidli., iii P 101) koL rurlt.liaig casing . Accueti,;Al blankets shall be vieed to reduce type of Ze.V.,jjnjnC rkOtEP 'to insignificant Je,,relo . < i Al! dcillin�; Ciid Vroci - tion wells shall be m�,,Ntorz; ayad C*U !-tic pumps only . No generator ghall be used . (j ) D;?uLle mufflers a h a Il be uaeO. on produft�.on hoints and earth moving equipment , further reducing the Impact to the neighborhood . (k) Wel.,. sr:_rvlcc! rige shaI3, be operated no more than 48 days psi year between 7 : 00 a .m . and 1 : 00 p .m. or daylie;bt %ioure , whichever i ,i shorte�, . No more than 4. well iervice rigs may be or. the ,iremiees at any oLa time . The service rijo shall not exceed 120 feet in height and shall be duuble-muffled and utili,.,e acoustichl blanketo . (1) The 24-hour driliing phase shall not operate for longer than two years . 2 . 9 . 2 A backboe will be used dvring the construction of the water pipeline . fludinSiL; the City hereby makes finding ( 1 ) . .r4QtO_j.-1_.SURRQ-Tt of (a) Double mufflers will he used cn backhoes during the construction of the water pipeline , and workmen will be cautioned to work as quietly as possible . M Any residual noise impact will not be significant because it will be temporary in nature and will only iaccur during the day. Residents :)f each block will only be affected for approximately one day, 28 . 7. , 10 . 1 ��',:i.� ,� The potential. exists for oil spill.a team the pipes , t aiv.ya , teknks and e uipmen4. , and trot the sinal �l arlounte of r,r.ude oil vhich will be contained on the Y*el 9 ity Site in <.r,age ti-nks . The Cit^- hereby malrea fiirding (1; . � .s_-_i<n._ l� 2S►� tr _of-"-i lad .: The following measures will mitigate the identified- Impact to a level or ineigr,.ifJ ;:ance . (a) If an oil. spill octufred during a rainstoim, uu:,fsce drainage water could become crintaminated with crude oil `. be Drill Site and Facility Site have been designed to provide con't+ainment: of surface fluids such as etormwater , and an emergency condition& , crude oil . The Sites ahall be enclosed with masonry wal le which provide complOte control of eurfAce `luide . All true gates and maint gates shall have raised thresholds with,, either eta ed ramps or raised stoops whicia preclude surface flufdls is - n leaving the SAte . All ? rface fluids shall be diverted catch basins , I� I (b) The Facts in Support of 1"i.�,ding 2 . 2 . 1 , describing the diversion of eurf6ce fluids to catch basins , hereby are ina^orpor:ated by reference . ;c ) 1f the tanks xupt,ti r ed and sp i ll.ed oil, , the containment arcs for spill will contain approximately 69 , 000 cubic: Feet , almost two times the minimum volume requiter! by the StAte PAvlsion of Oil & Gan . The containment area is belov grade , approxisately 4 feet lower that the water processing aL-ea and 6 ,feet lower than the a0acent; street level , The containment area will, contain any ui l spilled from tanks . (d ) The Project will use all new pipelines , valves , f i.tt in;ta , tanks and Fiquipments . All pipelines will meet the requirements of the State of California pipeline Safety Act . All items will he Prt�t;eCtEd a�a►ia�st cor�rasias�Sy one or ■ore of the, followngg : polyv .nyyl clar16 costing on exterior butied pipel:lnes , cathodic protection #ystem, paint coating on all above-ground pipelines and equipment , epoxy coati.,,,g on interior of water proce®aing tanks , and use of stainless steel fittings . (e) An Operating Procedurev Manual shall be prepared for the training of all new employees . Each operAto r shall ba required to thoroughly uinderstand and bie able to operate esch pike of equipme"t i» the system. The operating proc eduree manual shall explain in detail how to operate each piece of equ;p;me nt and include ;!Mf,,c9en'-V Procedures , al-rat-down of equipment atil .nn� ificati,on tJ authorities _eC t : veoxious chewic;a' e , both non. hazardlo s and hazardous , are uti.lixed in oil and gas drIll.ing, production. Chemicals be used to enhance: t1r% drilling mud prorTrties during drOl of oil and gas weds , for dehydration of the crude oil to marketable quality , to inhibit c orroxion , acale and 'bates ial levels , and in treatment of the pEcoduced water to stain-able reiri4eetiun quality . Zindj=: The City hereby makes finding (l) . ,'.'l.tIj An..__Su:��,p4r _ .. I�►g The fcliawi.r,g measures will mitigate the identified impact to a level of insignif �icaxt�e: . (a) ]Noma of the chemicals used for the Project will be used in large quantities , or wovId ever be used off of the 2 Project sites . (b) Ali federal and state regulatiolle , including worker and comwunity disclosure programs , site Business Emergency Plana , Proposition 65 warnings , hazard labelling an$ Spill Prevention Got. �:rol & Countermeasure Plans , shall � be fully enforced . (,c ) Fact (c) in Suppdrt of Finding 1 . 2 . describing emergency action and spill, prevention plane , hereby i. incorporated by reference . (d) If a localized spill of hazardous materials should occur , it would be contained in the area, and no impact would occur outside the Site boundaries , Procedures to mitigate impacts to on-site vorhers shall be included in the Opera}iono Manual . (e) The Facts in S•ipport of Finding 2 , 10 . 1 dexcribing the containment of materials on the Drill Site and Facilfty Site , hereby are incorporcted by reference . M The State Derlpartmdent of Realt! Services has I 30 , a. } 1 ' i `�app 1�ett�oered a .1 �. et ()f �nc�-i�a�ar-r, �o additx�+�� fie scarpryr mud , , a is r►o'.hicax :; tY the .•Lindica►te� eNch ther. oha►zard�� � cixli,ing htv o:'�r that would materials will be required . `.•!`he� :efore , to the greatest ateri feer� ile , t:t�� iypernt:or of the Project shall use � nos-h&zardous odditiveS i ' he PtoJtct drilling mud . ^ oil. will be trans ��rted � . 1�l. 3 p �t.iA1�- sct . 4 x ude in an existing Chevron pipe line from the 'recilitY S to to Chevron' s re•-pump staty.on . Where is a P062ibility of ,pi pea ine rupture . Li.0 1imize - Tne t,.;i ty hereby m:tkea finding (I ) . ( ) The addition o t�:e pto,ject ' s oil etreaem will reduce pressure oxi the Chevron crude oil pipeline . Because the oil from the Project will enter the pipeline higher t,em eratlare` than the oil cu�rr .ntly in the yipeline ,a it will reduce the viscosity of the oil . This n turn will reduce reMlre in the e1 it e rupe T , e thereby deecraasi�nS the possibility of pip pt1 compared to existing conditions . (b) zvan if p the pi e l i ne ru to zed , the only oil that would be released would be the oil in the pipeline between block valves . Automatic shutd �table tois dthesP�o�e�t at inc�rementai volume of oil attr ib an ihsiSnif item level in the event of pipeline rupture , (c ) Chevron coxyle�teyd hydrotestinS its pipeline iRchn 1988 to a pressure of 750 pounds per square l�arCh F Fire The test eras witnesses and approved four the State Marshal by the Karin. Corporation, on Karcli 2 , 1� 4 � a r the rupture of the we.ter tipeflinev or aiccide me :,eesieltin n from r mtpe�d waver naccess pipeline ,try rencheEs dvr in` th+e construct io I could have public safety impacts . ,ldi The City hereby makes finding (x (a) The !"acts in Support of t z 2 . 2 . 3 ual ity eshesesby� MO&Inrol mitigating any impacts on erst: ate incorporated by reference . (b) The water pipcline wilA be monitored with autesaatic. shutdown psessure sensors , so that Any sudden 31 1 I ` I he ptesaure drop will t r i er an 11 er s� &1.azthat.n any shutdown rc aser cif txanefer palrnpb . . I w w altar is �i.ryxanal. . ( c ) No trwnc.hes wig - bee in�e will b� inen at �tal�.ed ,d sevexal hundred fe '�. of pip surveyed , inspected and trench ensure that dp pedestriansn one do Daring the day , b a;: Tiers will e re not approach trp>'Ychee�, r This ,flsnde��r�o�nci pipelines .rd p procedure ire the t onst-.u�.tion c. g 2 . ].p . 5 P.� a pt ; ai 1-related, �;a�� leaks Could y1ndil4a: The City herebf1 makes finding ( 1) ia) A report scads by CeoScience Ana►lyticai. , I11c . (Roberti Deport) determined that a was s 11-0 bio�eric eles f oxethed eXrlosion sae caused by gas g . result of bacterial decay o not oil elated to awae&king pipeline or poorly, abandoned o .4180 ,determined that only one of the 91 gas sam lea analyzed in tinyg ton Peach was petrogenic , Or associated with oil ,. Run Eighteen samples subsequently ei taken in Huntington un These ns�dies were determined to be of b g indicated that the problem of methane gas hazard hoes not have its roots Ja oil field-related artiv..ty. (b) Water flooding in as coil reservoir reducea the amount of free ga.s and lessens the possibility of gang leaks , Any free gas flows to areas of low pressure . Producer wells are areas of 1cw preaenre , and as will flow thew throe hout the proceas 0f -represavy z itiox► • Injection w411s will be Located away from poorly abandoned wells and in close proximity to producing 1m ' ensuring that free gas will flow to the p nx g wells . i (c) A contingency plan shall be submitted to the Huntington Beach Fire Department for review and approval , with steps to be taken in the event that leakage from any abandoned r++ells which do not meet present day abandonment M requirements finds its way to the surface . (d) The possibility of fire and/or ezylosiot he drill. rise does not coustituts a significant impact, because the drilling equipment will be a nipped with Class III blowout prevention equipment . Add tion&lly', the reservoirs of the Project are wrall knOwu, having been Produced for over 60 years . The reservoir pre,ssur• is f 32 . I I� akA I , ' Y h well below hydrostatic and will be easily controlled by the drilling m!id . Therefore , all anti.cipr',•ed eubsur}ace gill be contained by the weight of the mud . If a fire did occvr , the oiler, ce'llare will Allow the Fire Department to conty-0.1 3: fificam the Burnes: , wif.hout having to enter the cellars . 2 . 11 . 1. ,t,i13 t : The Project could inerease the demand an ?in olice protection aervices , including, potential al F inrrspeo Vsnd3l i am And not cit; aui sauce complairats . , X: The City hereby makes finding ( 1 ) . _.ja....jup pox t.—Qt- JEind. : The fallowing mea Ell Vea will mitigate the identified impact to a level of insignificance. (a) The proposed site will be enclosed with a deeorative masonry wall and with a .landscaping berm. The i wall and landscaping will avoid providing eany access ,to the site . (b) The facts in 'Support of Finding k . 9 . 1 , relating to noise impacts , hereby are incorporated by refexQ-nce. 2 . 11 . 2 i � .. '" The potential for fire , odor or 9pill incidents could increase the demand on ,fire prevention/protection services i.i the City , ?,fd311&A : The City hereby makes finding; (1 ) . fACU In SUPP rt O xnditrA ; (e ) The Fire Department has stated that it will *ctually have a reduced workload due to the consolidation of Many oil producing niters onto one fully equiped and protooted site . (b) An on--site fire suppression system shall be { installed as a primary source for fire protection, (c ) Oil wells shall, be provided with gas detection systeaas from cellars to 24--hcure monitoring locations . (d) nre extinSmishers approved by the Fire Department must be in6talletd within 75 feet of travel . (a) Metal open-grate covers shall be provided over the top of well Cellars . 33 . i �I i (f) Storage tanks +shall h,�ve pxc—plumbed foam injection systems and exterior eeluge enter spray eystems . (g) The foam storage area and fosta quantity shs,11. be approved by the Fire Depa r haent , and f i x e hydrants shall be located in areas approved by the Fire Department . Hydrogen sulfide detectira systems xoproved by the Firs: Department: shall be inn-called on the Ptoject. perimeter , and fire extingui.ahers approved by the Fire Department shall. bar. installed '-horoushotit: the Site . All gate openings must be 24 feet in ~afdth and installed in compliance with Fire Department Specification 403 . (h) A full -vaipor recovery eyatem shall be installed , as required by SCAQMD� (i ) Only three oar-site crude oil tanks are permitted , which shall uevex be completely full at once . (J ) Fact ( c ) in support ofFinding 1 . 2 . 1 , describing emergency action and spill prevention plans , hereby is incorporated by reference . (k) prior to termination of the oil operation , a plan sbs11 be submitted for the review and approval of the Fire j Department and Development Serviceu Department: , showing now the Site will be abandoned and restored to its closest naturbl. state . 2 . 11. . 3 tial. Affect : Paving of the Proj'ect site will increase stormwater , which could present additional, demands on tote serer system, r : The. City hereby makes finding (1) , .�jL. pLt of .JEii .t .: (a) The Facts in Supper,, of Finding 2 . 2 . 1 hereby ere incorporated by reference. (b) The Project will take about 30 , 000 barrels per day of produced eater frog Chevron, which is Currently dumping approximately 40 , OrO barrels per clay into the sanitary sewer . Therefore , instead of adding more brine to the never s stout this Project will relieve the sysr.:nA of about 30, 0M barrels per day, 34 . 1 4 rye r 1 . 11 . ► i�t7 11L ,1._.. eel. : During the initial dHIling operation , a fresh grater demRa:e, of 21 , OUO gallons per clay is expected . FclLowing completion of the dri ;l.,lin phase , they watex�t conrumpt.�.on ratc, will be reduced to 1 , 800 per day . J',j ail i n a,F;.: The City hereby makes finding (1 ) . (a) Fresh wPter use over the long term le roughly e uivalent to ar, ;t�;:;��stria; use one-third cf an acre in a zes , or about 6 :: Litched retjideutial uniLs . Adequate water supplies exiwt to meet this demand . The available fire flaw is 5 , 500 gallons per minute with 3 , 000 gallons pet minute being the required fire flow at present . During the drilling phase , one truck per day uorcaally will be required to collect and transport liquid oil wastes and one truck er day will 5e required to handle no.l id waste collected Fn medal bins , Tol1cwing the completiQn of drilling . the volume of wastes will be reduced , particularly for solid wastes such as Grill c%attingo . The periodic cleaning of tanks Juring they operational phase will require the removal of sludge from � tank bottoms , FindiaLg: The laity hereby makes finding (1) . JEAW llv% art O ndi"j.: The following Masures will Mid-gat-2 the identified impact to a level of insig,inficance . (a) Dumpin operations for oil field wastes are normally Undlet by contract service firms that specialize in waste disposal cs this type . (b) Sludge from tank bottoms will be deposited in a special dump a wiped to handle this type of wrastre , and deposited in a clans I landfill . (c) All waster materials , both liquid and solid , shall be collected and eepaitated on site , temporarily stored in credal bins and tanks , and trucked to appropriate disposal often . (d) Liquid wastes chall, be collected and stored in Closed tanks to prevent the: spread of odors prior to disposal . . (e) Collection ,areas foie wastes shall be located 35 . W,thia peripheral. walla and will not te vi s "O i e to residential areas . 2 . 11 . 6 tW_LJA __E 'i'he Project will require three business 1 isles anc a public phone or, earth parcel , It In likely that an i -ntercommunteation ) ine bet,feen the two parcels will. be included in the telephone system , rildinZiL: The City hereby maXes finding (1) . (a) The General Tel.,.phone Company provides tel.ephor service to the City Pnd to the Project site, No current inadequacies eibist in the system. The number of lines xervic.ing the Project site is lees than the number of lines which would be required if wedium density residt,utial units were developed on site . 2. 17 , 1 '- a t. . Drilling rigs and Production wells will be operated by electrical motors ani electric pumper , Although a small amount of natural gas gill be produced with the oil , additional natur il. gas may be required for Jroduction . The City hereby makes finding (1) . .S—U'uIYA_t. of rind 1 n z 6 : (a) Proper siziog of the well pumps will save energy throu&h reducing the amount of electricity used . (b) Southern. Californian Edison antftipates no problems in roviding electrical, service of the PrO ect . Southern California Gas Company , which will provide any additional natural gas required , also anticipates no problems in providing service for the Project , � (c) The purpose of the Project is to produce appEoxinatel.y 9 . 0 .million barrels of crude oll . 2 . 13 GL„Trn��rCa�vG�, ' , LO 2 . 13 . 1 JlgtUt i z1f,ut'. Compat ed to exi st in Conn itk '.P , the Project will have a growth inducing impact of 57 units . At the City—wide average of 2 . 78 persons per household, the 57 dwelling units would house 158 persons . 36 . 1.d I a' 0 The CitV hereby maXes finding (I " . (a) The 158 persens who would bte housed on the pro pact site re regents a population factox of only 0 . 08% of ihe estimated 1.981 City population, i (b) The Project will utilize two entire City blocks for the approximately 20-30 year life of the project , Used on existing General Plan and zoning designations+ , but for the Project , 'both of the t we Project blocks wr uld be unsd for reeidentlal purposes . Vnder existing zoning , 108 residential units could be constructed on the site . Based on existing General Pion designation , 16 -unite could be built or, the site . '1"h eref c%re , the growth irJuc ing effect of the Project could be less than tho number of units that could be delreloped on the Project write . 2 . 14 - .IMETS 2. 14. 1 Rot,er.tiA Afl ,t: Two other tail consolidation pro ects are ir the process of assembly within the rr1clnity of the Project . The cumulative effects of geese projects could have impact:a on Qubsidencre and gas teaks . ZJ : The City hereby mAkear finding (1 ) . 11,1R� t t. sit r i nd ids . (a) The racta in Support of Finding 2 . 1 , 2 , devcribing the effect of the Project on s%,beldence , herosby are *ncorporated by reference , (b) Tb* recto in Support of finding 2 . 10 . 5 , deco ribing the effe(;t of rater flooding on gas leaks , hereby are incorporated by reference . (c) In the Wilmington Field . water flooding tools place in an area what* ,cany wells veers damaged badly and not properly abandoned , Bven with this lame number of lx ro erly abandoned wells , there were no roblems with izujfttod fluids or oil or gas surfacing via these conduits . (4 ) The Si nal Sill field was unitised and three water f•i.00der initiated in 1914. Man of the wells in thiw field axe to old as the Runt inston each wells: howevar , the Division of Oil & Gar has received notification of ftly two Valle that have leaked . 1; , 2 . 14 . 2 IM-,,at C.Qnju. ;ct. ion with rr ►Bent' approved and proposed dev-;Jopmpata izi the City „ the secondary traffic effectp of theinduced &::Owth ftum f hi Project could rPet;lt i ", negative impacts on the rrircula+tion system , ,Und A : The Ci ;:y k,1<r.eby hakes finding (1 ) (a) Growth induce.] by the Proje!cl: :lb controlled by Genea-al 11an polici ,e2 tc, land ,:se deoignati.ons and circulation improvements . The land use des iguations used to generate estimates of secondary traffic impacts from induced growth are consistent with the current General Flair designation. Therefore , the traffic generated by these rases has been taken into account in establishing the General Plan circulation plan of arterial streets and highways . This plan adequately accommodates traffic estimated to be generated by General Plan designated uses . (b) A recent traffic study conducted .for The Waterfrout , which evaluates cumulative traffic leverle for the area of the City most likely to receive heavy traffic flaws from proposed development , confirmed that traffic will operate at acceptable Ievelo of serN.t.ce (c) The 108 vehicles wbi.ch would he ,associated with i the q7 units that contatitute the gxowth► inducing effect of the Project represent a very small increment of the new vehicles that will be within the area . 1 , 14 .3 rgtgut,��l_. �,��.: In conjunction with present , approved and proposed projects , traffic resiulting from growth generated by the project may add to noia+e levels adjacent to circulation routes . The City hereby makes findiDg ( 1) . racts; ill SURDor�1 Findings: (a) Implementation of. the Optimum Noise Levels , and of the Noise Abatement plan for Traffic Noise containe4 in sections 2 . 3. 3 and 2 . 3 . 4 of the General plan Noise Element, will mitigate these cumulative impacts to a level of Insignificance . 2 . 24.4 Potential, Effngt: In conjunction with existing , approved and proposed future projects , noise withixi the 36 . r vie init of the Drill Site and Facility Site, r, .d exceed City noise stayndardt . r L : The City hereby makes find.irq (I) . t#_.i.&.S oLt.. uL_ftudl ; (a) f'a+cts In Support of Findi-. g 2 . 9 . 1 hereby are incorporated by reference . (b) The of noise in , by definition . a "emmiati,velb measurement . It takes into account i background nciae . 3y conditioning the Project to comply with the City 's Noise Ordinance , the City bag ensured that cumulative noise levels vil.l not constitute a sig)iificant adverse impact . 2 . 14, 5 Rotential EfI..s.c-L : As a secondary of fe(J of the Projects autmobile emissions associated with the 57 dwelling units which constitute the Project ' s growth z inducin4 impact , in conjunctioA with present , approved and proposed dev*lopment , could result: in adverse Jupacts on ale: quality. The City hereby makes finning ( 1) . (a) It is estimated that vehicle emissions constituting a secondary impact of the Project would result in a daily increase in vehicle emissions of 3,596 . 3 ponzds per year . Any air qualito impacts from these emissions is offset nearly b times by the improvement in air qutlity caused by replacement of existing old oil storage tanks with new tanke fully equi 100ed With an effective vapor recovery system. The r rojict will result In a net reduction of 21 , 198 pounder of hydrocarbons, per Year . ! 1 . 16 . 6 R tiA,1 ff Act : As a secondary impact of the Projects the 57 units which coustitute the growtth inducing offset of the ptoject could generate additional sclool ebildren, potentially causing adverse effects on the eckool, eyatem. The City hereby makes finding (1) . (a) ftntiagtom Beach city schools have bean r�Irsienc ►ng a steady decline in enrollment over the past waft 10 yesra . Capac.i'y irp the Rchool diatvict curror � 1y exceeds utudent enrollment , and the schools imparts. +.i by the Project are particularly well siLua-Led to abourb Additional enrollment . proc#.ctel increased in entollment from the aro.j64 t do not e.,Kceed the excees capacity , even taking into ac.c outfit the iw,: t e,t-&,qA in ey)o.,ollmeait t xxpe,,- keel from othAer projects . (b) Tb,e total number of students from approved and topoeal ;, roject,s . Inel.uding Rrojer_#:•_rtI&tgd additions , ".t. �71. new st ude_nt s . Znrol..l.men+; pr,o jest ions ror Union Sigh School Uist.r lct 801")oIN .shows 4 61c3reasc irl entolifineat runtil 1.990 . An i.n.'r �avv iv pi, _-lek ted f.r;m t991. through 1995 . Tvt-n with neiy develc.%er,,- , however , the expected increase in students from 1997 1.995 not enough to c,,*mpensate for the expected decline in extra', meat between 1987 and 1992 . (c ) An increase in dwel.l.ing, oviite does not necessarily reault in an increase in enrollment . From 1975 to 1907 , ain edditiorsal 9 , 223 new dwellings rrere constructed and occupiad within the boundaries of the Huntington Beach Union High Scl-,,ol bittrict . The not impact on en=o:Llment: was s minuid 3 , 1.41 students , a 37% decreaoe . 1 40. 1 " L n 1 �n. i 3 . The SIR cletinps the „n() xojtCt" ►+l'ternative so INP Mlint'VTIATWr % of OXistl7,g C0114 Lions , 3 . 1 . 2 RIBA►I1=1_12L._.--- r t 0 ur The., City hereLy finds that the Project- `' �d +'.e+ xxtative lki not environmentally vuperic�r to Mho .Froject . (a) This alternative would not reavit in the abandonment of 21 eca.tterad wellu over a 160-ante area, . TPerefors, compared to the project , it, would increase the ' number of ree i+dences which remain adjacent to all-producing uses . The existing wells wou14 continue to produce oil , gas and water w. t.bout the addition of the modern vapor recovery syutemsr , secondarY recovevy tschnigiies , or state-of--thee•-art fire fighting 3quiptmet%t which will be incorporated into the Project . The continuing use of existing technology would have detr!. mental impacts on air quality compared to the proposed 'Project: . The potential for arrestinS !subaidence , or causing rebound , through injection would be eliula-aced , Zxcess brine produced by Chevron wrul d not be used for In jectiot +end would continue to be disposed of in the sewer systerc, thereby increasing the load on the sewer system in comparison with the proposed Project . istin$ fxM i 1 it ies would not be able to witlhatand the impacts of major earthquakes . (b) This s1ternative also would have positive effects, It wovald eliminate the reed for three heavy trucks per day to travel Lhrcugh the neighoorhood adjacent to the Project Site durin; the drilling ghaal of the 2ro ect ; world eliminate the possibility of a fire or a spiU of oil, or hazardu�is chemicals on t%a Project Lite; j and would eliminate the possibility of dulage to Project #dciliti*a and walls in the event of an oarthquak+e of. a a& nitvde of n a or grester .. This alternative also would 0118inat-i the vm* oil perimeter walls , which would be requited to mitigate atethetic and noise Impacts of the Iptop@44 pro j ecr , 1n wee i lbing the por i t i ve and negative Ouviromental of f ects of t.hi a alternative , howsm the City bar deterained that the positives effects of ibis a,ltornative are lose significant than the negative effects . 41 . :..7 r , r I 4, J� 3 . 1 . 3n : The r "no project" alternative would rut meet Project objectives bec&use it voul,d not ptrait the recovery- of 14 a� llion barre:lt of crude oil by using secondary recovery techni ues , ftistirig oil operations would conly recover approximately 500 , 000 ba!rreis cf crude oil . 't 3 , 1 . 4 feaslibiIIU: The "no pry j#;ct" alternative is feasible . 3 . 2 .LTC `1- 3 . 2 . 1 ._.A tOrmat 9: .e "reduced intensity" alternative would involve dri sing a number of limited injector wells for secondary of .. recovery, while retaining all existing wells .urrently operAti ng iii the 1.60-acre subsurface unit . A;�proximatel.y 1U injector wells would be drilled from one of the existing well sixes . 3 . 2 , �cS 1pas, � the Efi elc. ,fi-..Qg t-A ternativ!t tQ Qvoaed._EzP_j. The City hereby finds that this altertiat i ve is not environmentally super i eir to the Pr,)j ec t , (a) The "reduced intensity" alterna►t i. ve would not result in the abandorantz+t of 22 veattereei wells over a 160-acre area . Thorel:Qr,, , compared to the proposed projcc_t , it would increase the number of, residences which remain adjacent to oil-producing uses . Some of these residences are within 20 feet: of exist: ng wells ; therefore these residences wold be less buffered from the noise impacto of reworking the wells . This impact would be particularly significant in the Villa St . Croix site , in which five wells are locAted within 20 feet or less of condominium units . This alternative also would require routs high prensure water throuega lengthy pipelines under ?Pity streets . The possibility of leakage or rupture is a significant adverse impact which would not exist under the proposed Project. Exist nIg iactlitiees would not withstand a eaa jor earthquake , (b) This alternative also would have positive effects . Iu would eliiainatre the need for three heavy trucks per day to travel through the teighborhoocl adjacent to the Project Site during the drilling phase of the Project; would eliainatm the possibility of a fired or a sgiII of oil, or hazardous chemicals on the Project Site ; 42 . 1 1 and would elizinatee the possibility of damage to Project facilities and walls in the event of an earthquate cf a sa► nitude of M8 or greater . This alternative also would *1 sinate the use of perimeter walls , which would be required to mitigate aesthetic; & A noise impacts of the proposed Project . In weighing the positive and negative effects of this alternative, however , the City has deterlsined that the positive effects of, this alternative are less significant than the negative effects . 3 . 1 . 3 „Jz Meet imig-2ro ccL_DJ?J_cWmu : The reduced intensity alternative would not meet Project objectives because it would not result its optimum well epacin for injection . As a result , only approximately 3. 5 mi lion barrels of oil would be recovered . 3 . 2 . 4 2gg11h313 : The reduced intensity alternative is not feasible . )Eacts i. Suyia _ .of---JjAdinCA: This alternativL. would require acqui,rring the right-of--way for a considerable tenth of underground pipes . Liability for these pipes could be significant . According -to the Proj(. t applicant , the capital costs of this alternative would be approximately the same as the capital costa of the proposed Project , while less than one-half as much oil Mould be recovered . In addition, this alternative v,.: old not result in optimum spacing of injector wells . If secondary recovery did not work under this system, there would be no way to determine the source of the problem or to cure the situation . Ba©ed or. geese factors , the Froject applicant has concluded that thin alternative is not economically feasible . This alternative also is not feasible because it is not desirable , and may not be poseib+.e , to conduct well reworking in very close proximity to reeldeat3al units . 3 . 3 . 1 ANIC112tiOn 2f . AlUXU tine : Vnder this alternatives the proposed project would proceed as ddseribed in ,-his RrR, except that the drilling pro ram 16 be intensified to reduce the time span of tie drilling phare of the Project . A second prig would be used for drilling, The two-year drilling period would be to treed by several months , , -for. d, hlt...Rza2gand . The City hereby 43 . _ .. -177 4 finds th&t the "more Intense drilling program" alternative is not envlronmeutall.y superior to the Project , -of ri nd in¢ (a) Approximately trice as many heavy trucks per dray (6 instead- of 3) would be required for the intensified drilling program. Two 165 , rigs would be used instead of orae, resulting in increased aesthetic impacts 4nd ftking It more difficult to control noise and light/glare impacts , (b) The Project site would be occupied for oil-produOng foie lities for a slightly shorter perior of time, because the intensified drilling program would seduce the curnstruction permed by several months . Impaets of the drilling phase , including the noise and traffic isa acts (although intensified) , also would occur over a slightly shorter time period . When weigIed against the mor " severe and unmiti.gable impacts that,:- would occur , bov :ver , thin reduction in she drill.iug period does not outweigh the negative impact$ of this alternative . 3 . 3 . .� Wm tivea"JL-i,Ii--fee, —Rx Qb,Jestl ►-ei : The j1%ore intense dri :.%ns program" e1teirnative would meet the Project objective2 3 . 3 . 4 anai f;,y.,; The "inure ititenue drilling progrPWI is fearibly , but would be mox - expensive than the proposed Project . 3 . 4 AW' 1-I-U ALL D-14-1 -JU. 5 3 . 4 . 1 2uu1 4 e%,n Under this alternative , the ail facilities on the Project site would be removed and ZZ scattered area is over 160 acres would be abandened , as under the proposed Project . `rho Project site and the 6 scattered sites would be &vailtble for other uses . kcaidential use in aeoignated in the General Plan and Zoniyag . . .p .. . t3 . 4 , 2 � - erna t , ►dr,.. i k :.hlt ,.R posed Pr2 j+mj: The City hereb finds that this &.1ternative is en,%,,I coo aentall.y preferaKle to the Project because it would eliminate the effect of oil-optoduclug ursen throughtout the project Area. 3 .4.3 ?J1 1R i z112A4 ... ,in Ke2tting Project Q Lctivee : This alternative would not result in the rec very of any Oil frow •ubsitfac,@ reservve . Therefore , itwould not *tot tke project objecti.vos , It would reduce the amount 44 . Y� I : of oil which could be produced f rom 9 million barrels to $era barrels . 3* 4. 4 Zmasibil : This alternative is riot feaID)le . .JIL�.SUgport !2X _ Einar : It in highly vialikely that (aa) oil operators would all agree to abandon O3 their erations , and that (b) ready purchasers would be availablo for all of tLe sates . T;rerefore , in order to impleant this alternative , the City probably would have to acduite the miaeral rights for come or all of the wells ` "d dy for the abarAdonm3ut of the site , Some arrsa&emeat 5 wWOU have to be !made with the surface owner for rein t •event of all or part of the City ' s costs following resaie straddor development of the sites . 3 . 4, 4 ,irea®ihi.liU: This alternative iv not feasible . LUU--P.ir. _Su" zt -sl-li nd ix4. : It ix hi,bhljr u likaly ttAt ,a) oil operators would all agree to abandon their operstionw , and that (b) ready purchasers would he available fot all of the aitea . Therefore , in order to implement this alternative , the City probably would have to acquire the mineral rights for some oz all of t`is wells and pair for the abandonment of the site . Somr e r rangem ent would have to be made with the surface owner , for reimbutoement of all or part of the City ' s costs following resale and/o:, 6ovelopment of the sites . An a rough estimate , using, the industry standard of $15 , 000 per average daia,r barrel of oil production , it would court approximately �1 . 3 million to acquire the *instal rights for all of the sites . Abasn t would cost approximately $ . b million. Th,s alternative also would deny acesios to the royalty owners of the mineral estates . Ivw, *sousing that the mineral rights could be putchso9d tot 11 . 5 million. this fi ure does not &Wgn my Arhus toonsecovered reserved , which are worth in the tons of sill MA of dolla,z e . TWAs alternative does not appear to be "feasible * ,, fl 3. �- i ampartatlas of AlternAtize; parcel 1 consists of 1.6 ac a ss l.00at to the northwest of the PCOJ Oct sit-2 on ties Strest r bmuded by Torktcwa A"nue on the north and Uties Avenue an the •oath. Me Project e-ppl icao t •dose not OM the gurfAte ar the Oit►etale below the surface . The Runt ingtOU Beach Company is the mineral owner . Patcol 1 is surrounded by appromlastaly 15 acres of fee laud which mJ .hy f y 1 t 4, c ,F is aixe awned by the Huntington $eAch Company , Althou*h ,this land is currently vacant , it is soaped for residential Pardsl 1 is too small to acco-nooda'te all of the fullitles and Neil cellwrs necessary for an all recovery k facility. Therefore , the Project facilities Site would still be used . Although some wells could be drilled on laraol 19 some wells Mould still have to be drilled on the IteJect Drill site . AltetaA ,Ve to MIA 11 AtTile City hereby d th* s altmot ve i• not envi.ro entail sllpor for to th9 Project . Y Pa�,. n S ,R11gl : Approximately 60% of the wells for the Project could -be drilled on Parcel I . Al~hough this would result in a slight reduction in the effects of the drilling phase on the neighborhood surroundi the Project , drilling would affect two residents u igt�boxhvods iustesd of one . although the area surroundirg Parcel 1 currently is vacant , it is proposed for residential, use. 3 . 5 . 3 MUCtiYynggl in Meeting Pss &ft Ob JeLtJy-e.1 This alternativi would meet ;project objectives , 3 . 5 . 4 ,b .y : This Citernative is not feasible . ;[ACt2 Vie Project applicant does not own Parcel 1 , rurthermore, in order to use Parcel 1 as a surface site to drill into the southeast art of the Springfield unite the Project applicant would :VO to acquire pass--throu h rights from the Runtington Basch Company. The City tan bean advi eed that the Runtington Beach Company is planning a surface development for tbv 17 acres site surround ' P cel 1 . and that it would not be interested in delaying this development for th3 20-30 year life of the project . Therefore, the alternative is not "feasible` because it is not capable of being accomplished ovecessfullLy in a reasonable period of zt, ti sec taking into account economic, social , and legal factors . 3 . A project 4*s i aced to b* Solely devhel � from Parce � 1 1d geed t Te ttduted in rise considerably. The ' . $ acre sit* wm1d 46 . k' V 7- Orly accemodate a rosizately once 20-•well Cellar and much IM116t product lotgn ection facilitieu . The southeosterh #altinri Of thO Project could not be reched by directional Vslls from parcel 1 so that portion of the reservoirs eou1d not be Mrp10ited . 366. 2 ."11 ,.of th M ntm of tba A1tM10Atfve to Project : The City find* here► that this alternative would have envirafteinta? ettects of k bagni,tude equal, to those of the Pco j ect . B�,. of P'indine: Althou, h the area su rtouhdi Marcel 1—currently is vacant , it is proposed toe f1sid"ti,al u8s. Project impacts , including aesthetic iewte , the po+rsibili,ty of fire and impacts of an M 8 or Stoatat eatthquaka, would effect any such residences . $16. * N0111 .LL M99ting PXQjdct � s�.t yam •' This alternative would not meet Project oblectfves be.-.auee It codld only recover approximately 4 . 5 million barrels of oil , diince injection rated would have to be lower and the Project could not be fully developed . 1t would also take lonSer to produce the reserves , 3. 6 . 4 I'��, This alternative is not feasible . Jacts Jp R Xt__Qt FiAdines : The project applicant does nut cim parcel I . Furthermore, in order to use Parcel 1 as a surface site to drill into the southeast p=art of the Springfield unit , the Project ajppllcant would ttawe to acquire pass-through rights from the Huntington $each Company. The City bay been advised that the Slantington Beach Company is planning & surface development tilt the 17 &eras site-� Rurroun4in Parcel 1, and that it w9111'_. hot be interest:ul in delaying this development for the 10-34 year lire of the project . 7berefcra, the alto:native to net "feasible' 'because it is not capable of bdiag deecuplished succeasfullly in a reasonable period of tieae. tAklng into account economic , social , and .legal �arteta. 3 . 7 AL A I filrEs : RA 1L 3.�.1 IMIGS 944 of A togas%-In : parcel l is located as the foatheaet coraer Of Reach Boulevard and Adams Ate. It touoists of approximately 3 .5 scree and is Mad 01 . psttcef 2 is bated at the extrtme southeatte:tn aw Olt tho S tinsfiald Unit and would require aetls to be Mille! ftlt? 4tceed the normal parameters of coaventionarl 47 . ,W c' w, a F a w r , directional drilling . The site is too small for the facilities necessary to accompany the wells . Therefore, the project racil:it sae Site would still be used. 3. 7.2 Cpn1R X 1 agn t the Zrtectn of thg, Alternat ye to .&ffgct2 of thl,,.. naaa Pro jlet : The City hereby Linde that this alternative is not environmentally preferable to the Project . to in SuRgQtL of Eli": Under this r: alternative , there would be a greater buffer to tesidaential a[areaass and there is direct access for traffic from Beach Boulevard . However , impacts froo the drilling at Mei is would affect residential areas and would be Increased under this alternative because the wells would require as longer tra -lectory and would take considerably lon er to drill . Drilling impacts would affect the people living in part of the Saeasabri.dge project because parcel 2 is in clone proximity to this development , The f.%rst phase, Seaabridge Village , consists of 200 units . The second phase , the Lakes at Seabridge , ias planned for 202 iAanits . i 3 . 7 . 3 ZffMQtJygae14 in He t_int . rojer Objectives : .this alternative would meet the project objectives . 3 . 7 . 4 feasibility : This alternative iv not fea.e able . Laac & in SuitRgit gf ZirldiAga: The p o j ect. applicant has been advised that the p:roparty owner in p a0wiing a surface developmert on parcel 2 when the existing Chevron wells are no lougaer viablo , and woulO not be interested in delaying this devel.op►n,ent for the 20-34 �rear life of this alternative . Therefore , the alternative i is not "festsible" because it is not capable of being aaccompl,isbed aauccoostully in a reasonable period of time, taking into account economic , social . and Segal f&ctos . In addition, the aita z onf iguraaati.on would not allow for the drilling of the: necessary Wells , even if the facilities were located on the Facilities Site . 3 .811 1D&gCr Jgt JgU gJ Altegnativa : Parcel 3 3n bounded i by Memphis Avenue on the north , Knoxville Avenue on the sontho Florida, Street on the west , and Beach Boulc7ard on the' !fast . It consists of approzimately 8. 2 acrelr` and is toned C+4 (Si hway Comerc ial) facing ftach &mll svard and i &*3 (Medium--Nigb Residential) on the reasaat►inder of the sites. 48 . w Parcel 3 it located at the extreme eoUtbeaitern aw of the sp rintfield unit and would require wells to be dt i 11e wthigh exceed the normal Parameters of Conventional directional drilling . 34 .2 Ccwftftar mom of �#he �tfact=, ths, via to spe�ig Jilet : The City hereby Roe" t this alternative is environmentally preferable to NO Project . rletc its of _t1%1d : More buffering could be ptoviderd r nce the site is larger . The parcel Also 4&0 Sood access for truck traffic to peach houl td . Tbo faci,l.itles and the wells could be tonsolleted onto one site, reducing the perimeter of tho oil producing area . T'hi.s could reduce the impacts of oil operations on surroundins Tesladential areas . 3 .b. 3 EffeCtiv�,s. ,.j... .t Cbjec ives,; This alternative would _,ot meet the Project objective• , ,fAr.tfi IQ ... eOrt._.�2L.1i.td1nt : This alternative i wronld not meet the roject ob3ec:tive of recovering 9 I million barrels of oil., because wells would be unable to coach the thickest part of the resevoir . It is estimated that it +rind result is the recovery of a maximum of 6 million barrele of oil . 3 , d . 4 1-bl"tJ: Thie alternative is not +easible. ZACts 1a you of : The City has been advised ttat the 11urtington Beach ompan;; it lanning a outface development on Parcel 3 when the existing Chevron Utilities are no longer viable , and would not be Intotested in delaying tbio development fos the30,-30 year lifer of the alternative . 'Therefore , the alternative is not "feasible" because it in not capable of being acct*pli$b@d rvccersfully in a reasonable period of time $ taking into account economic , nocial , and 1e8a1 factors . The alternative also would be ecoNomica►lly Infeasible . The lead caste of the alternative site would 1ti 11t0hibitively high because of the C-4 and 1t-3 zoning. 44t0w96r-acre swap with the Pro f ect site would be �ro�tMihls . 3 .9 ALXUS&=_fib g : pA '�• i IOl UitiM.oaf..,.��ern.al i a: Pares!, 4" )tcCalleu OILI is SOCAtiM V*ft of Delaware Street between Yorktown Aftwo and Utica Avenue . It Is a dedicated park tined by the City and consists of approximately 5 . 1 acres . lutcounding uses are residential (n-2 ) . 3 ,9.2 CgMy„xrisoa of tba Efftcts of be Alt:e�tiv Age - Pr�__ey-t : The City hereby de that th s alt ernat ive is not envi rorsentel ly y. superior to the Project . gacta,- in SUpgort gf The facilities and the wells could be consolidated onto one site , reducing the perimeter of thr oil-produciz4 area. However , tho possibility of u set would be increased , because all of the well* auold Cove to penetrate the main portion of th n1ood�-Ne ort f ult . Well damage by fault movement, is av �rell--known phenomenon in the Wilmin&ton oil Veld , even .rhen no measurable earthquake has been recorded . Although 41, rface damage to the wells or surface installationto robably- would not occur , dour hole damage at tdae fault ntertept would pi+aclude the ;roper abandonment of the damaged yells . THs alternative also would eliminate a dtdirated park. This impact could be partially mitigated by j conducting a "lard swap" in which the Project applicant traded the project site to the City . A park could then be established on the Project site . The parr on the Project site would be smaller than the existing 5 . 8 acre site and would consist of two separate parcels divided by a otreet , creating an adverse sifety impact . 3 .9. 3 Eff,activen"&jL. in ee tin; fto-J t.. ._0J,u-t.i3ttij This alternative would meet Project ob,iectives . 3 .9 .4 Feaslhzl�: This alternative is not feasible . E=dr I Mort of P,.in,dingA.: The City does not desire to exchange McCallen Park for the Project site . Safety issues relating to the need to drill throw h the AltleWpad-Newport taut make gain a less 4es iable ernative . 3 . 10 MMMi JX RESUMI& ER03ECT k' 3 .,10.1 c J tic„ n of AltsrUAti3re: 1feiOer block of the ptojett site w6ul,d v)e used for oil recovery, but instead Mould be made available tot devela ent of a zed Lm deceit�r residsutial dravelogment project . Oil recovery tatious would continue at ::;as 22 wells within the 160 atte. fro eet Area. At density lovele permittad by the Ge"941 Plus that ftsiect Site could be developed with 76 Resid9Utial unit* . "Ina Muntington Beard Ordinance Code 50. allowd fot the development of 108 units , and other sovioitMe ar the Cade may allow a greater number Of Unit• of 4pocial purpose projects . -g� g�;d Prn�a j: The City ereby IVths�C this alternative is not erviranisentally supetior to the Project. RAG. ! ice,,,$uRDQlt Of LnLA8 . (a) This alternative would not vesult in the obas49me at of ZZ ocattegred wells over as 160-acre area. Thy rotofe. compared to the Project, it would increase the &U%ber of residences which remain adjacent to did -p roductus uses . Tho existing wrello voul,d continue to produce oil , goal and water without the a►dd it i ogu of the saodern vapor reccvery systems; , set..)ndAry recovery techniquos s or state-of-the-art fire f i tr t igng equipment which will be incorporated into the Project . The o;onti,nuin8 use bf existing technology would have + det t<<mental impacts on air quality compa►rsd to the proposed Project . The potential for arresting subsidence , or causing rebound , through injection would be eliminated . F.xcers biAne produced by Cbevgron would not be used for injection and would continue to be d.toposed of !n the curer system, thereby Increasing the load on the sewer system in comparison with the proposed Project . Existing facilities would not be able to vitheLand the impacts of major earthquakes . M This alternative also would have positive offsets , It would elimi>n4ta the need for three beavy►` j trues per day to tiravel through the neighborhood adjacent to the Project Site during the drilling phase of the Project ; would elivinate the poesilili.ty of a fire or a $pi l of oil or Uaardous chemicals on the Project Site ; 04 would el iassssai aat:e the f0he ssibi1ity of damage to Profectfacilities aged wails in event of an earthquake of a askaituds of N 8 or greater . This alternative also would 41TWaa00 the Use of perimeter walls , which vould be rto"irod to mitigate aesthetic and noise impacts of the at Mad Itoject. Igo weighing the positive and negative 8asev rota effects of this alternativve, howev ir , the City has detearained that the positive effects o this Aiteruative Are less significant than the negative effects . , (o) 22 Adlitiont the "assedium density residantial ,eft" altathative also has the adverse 't i r► it ►>ebr+l impa►c�c a associated with the construction and ftaupa>ney of residential units . The construction of 51 . s residential unite would izvolve the temporary i.m son ally associated rii,th residential conrfructfon including increased nolve , traffio , dust, risk of lire , paint furors and trash . Such construction related impacts q 1d oeeur for a peria of between nine months mud a► gear . Traffic and parkin impacts are associated with the sales of mental activities involved Stith resideatlai units . Such sales or tenting related impacts may occur over a period of between three months and a year . Noise, traffic parking, risk of residential fire are impacts aarreoe-Item with the occupancy of residential units . Such impacts would be perseanent . 3 . 10.3 NUUtlyenall in thiting RXg Jett _Qb-J arti3ear The "no ro ect" a►ltetnative VIOUId not Meet Project objectives bwecaase it would not permit the recovery of 9 million barre.le of crude oil b-f using secondary recovtry techniques . Exioti.ng oil operations would only recover apprQxiaately 500 * 000 barrels of crude oil , 3 . 10 .4 a1,.hIlity ; This alternative is feasible . i 52 , c',d, ► - t,to , {,S I. 1 STATZONT OF OVZRRIDI G CONSIOER"LONS it J fT" ` r+' 1 , 1y Mho ncs; ` L 'I$tOWW. TkL IIIPAC'f RMIT NO. 88,1 , =VT. IMPACT R1 POOM 90. 8 S-1 1. r BTl1VXWHT CP MMIDING C OUSIDMATIONS The final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No . 98-.1 and savironwntal Impact Report No. 96 . 1 f6r the Springfield Gil ftCorr,Say Project identifies certa(n unavoidable adverse significant OnVironMatal effects . CE IA Guidelines , Section 15093, requires the decision -maker to balance the benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether the project should be approved . if the decision-maker conclLuR.-is that 1 the benefits of the project outweigh the unaVOIA-abloB adverse environmental effects , the effectts may be considered acceptable . � The final FUR 'Adenti f ies three s epsr. a,:e unavoidahte adverse � onvi ronmentcl impacts . (See Section 2 . Q, Draft Supplemental SIR 88-1 . ) Theme are: I. ha thatice The neighborhood surrounding the project situ consists of: *WiUm denrity residential uses, predominantly in small, (8-10 unit) developments and single family residences . Views of the project Site front adjacent residences will consixt of the 1 screening block wall and landscaping . nuring the initial drilling phases, drill rigs will be visible . During the 1 prodocti*n and injectior phasea, temporary drill rigs will be used periodically for maintenance anC will be visible from Adjawent r$aidests , Tanks will. be visirle above the wall . YF 1 . Y y. UPAOT a worst Case s:oftarlo, aasumi ng that all oil, tanks or* full and the tanks ecs not ont in an open field without surrounding perimeter wall&, there in a "rare" (defined + n the k. E standard werthodology for risk assevement an 1: J 0, ciao to 1: 10000,ot►d chance that an oil tank fine could reeault in rodleat hest affecting they area outside of the ifw&ediat,e Project fits. 3 . r, 1 if an •arthquaka oQ of 8 . 0 or greeter on the Richter Scale occurs with its epicenter in the {project area , structures in the Project Area , i-oic lulling tanks and walls of the project fracilitios, would h.� damaged. Each of these effects is lessened by the mi.tigatf on measures suggested in the Supplemental and original EIR, which meaaurter will ba requited and incozpor. sted into the project . i Hare►, tha City of Huntington Beach doer, find that the benefits flowing to the City and its rosideents from the projsct outweigh the 219MR106 t advorse eaviror, ontal effects which commits, aftor the projoattO 61tigat9ion diesoures are implremesterd and that the Othrmentiottod, unavoidable significant effects are acceptable, based -;w on the tallowing eveerriding considerations : �•�lr . ,; 'fir } t "f k. J •�'�r �i�"41'• r ;;; project will replace i8 existing tanks which care not � to aoetrQld for i i r pollutants. This will result in a 1 rJr 'r mot roMmt-Lea of 21. 198 pounds of hydrocarbon omissiom per # ,,oc, Hsu 87 peromt: reduction in hrd rocarboo cnidsions ' sther xeductions in uydrocarboe emissions will also result from m the elimination of other antiquated process equipment . F. 2. The project will bring about the abandoruee nt of 22 scattered wells ova: a 160-acre area . As a result, the abandoned sites can, be used for other purpoEes consistent with their General : maning doslgnations . Fewer City residents will live 641. t to or in close proximity to oil activities. This will o positive aostbetic impact o an the City. y ^;• 31 Th •prole+bt will result in the abandonment to modern standards 1, p ll.ee whioh have been abandoned,, but not to modern Is. . This will contributtf to the public health and i 41 The cozoolidatiou of a number of of 1 producing operations on a singlee 'site,* with , >oodeern fire control equipment, will reduce the workload of the City Eire department, This will contribute :�tO-Abe ipublio health sad sofeatyo The vtojoct will use approximately 30#000 barrels of produced water for in ection i purposes . This waters is currently dumped into the sanitary sewer by Chevron. This will reduce they demand on the sanitary never system. 6. The use of water injection has ;been shown to arrest subsidence, or even causer a slight rebound . The project will help to accent subsidence in the Huntington Beach nit field. I y3•- ( 14664) ji .w4W" U r MOB! i ttobt 60091derstion 1• the lnoseaso Is oil Jt ! nis'«dS ba'xkols of ail to 0 x111MM barreh +l 1W IWO ,froo tho consol l dst iom a TM all will bgt uule4 RAOIN08 f xim (lid Ul Wou gallons) glad Otte t t xo 1 •'fir��r yn ru A Yi r ^� p11• a � r i' lT , a iry �a �II Fly 1 a. 1!�5V 1 1 " {N lo I. • .', .,o. Jr ' )•#1 r���S��r� �Y�,• l.'?'X�yyW�r-.7 i�+ �� .IrV�,� r. ra��o(o�!pA+rS}l,¢���v�-1. .��( 1.% �L�,�" 6Q'a���' R � , .1 r �. � � r ��•�r; rr I �j(^S7�NT+ F y r ,+ „.r`k '7.�� b� 'r,r/♦)i:a rl.� 'I•'' +�,�0 4 V,sM 4ta" , �{rJ�'� , r �• '�',� .4 �• ` . ) '��O r AtoolaTiTiol fro. 1407 r � poI•-r ��r� l,ti;• I , I .I . "r I . , r 'II j , O! the OUR has pointed aM,t *yy��at, 0#►$0i detiolNrio��r� ► lr WIMS the emission of 0041YOLIA of two 1Jor ,f t-04w , , di-c"O r, 000604MOW with 'the pfojaet as well ss not $bWO 4^00, 4� ONOCOl S+w# •anialy s of the COMIAtLve 1606ats of the P rey project . AdditloN411y, the systems sats:Y aspootr ;01 ' o �1 "40joat aid sower*& after toasts have bot been ► ► , a *"@do Pubstastial roviSioan of the current Draft I d Ose rs 1 jr0d slna* tbo revised decrument Will Zy, id otil vio l �l-Ial,ll,caut ivacts* we . believe Mat the revised do rat should be recl rculatad as a Draft OUR to allow further review by both Responsible Agencies and the Public betase consideration by the decision nakars of tbo city. 10 w1;, fa • I , on the, oancentgation of Nei at well as then volume in the 04POUDD of W011 heelie Mn slouid discuss the potential for fire ard Ox0josion from natural gas at the wall hold or in the �,•: , li,„ : :4 ! 00014 discuss the incremental impact of O1a '601 ' 'O Wr6s, in the Chevron crude ail pxpeilue. isatl tldr .of *Bob kasrrdio SS chemical pro jeckerd got use dbofuld be edtf"tod. An sn+211slt MhoUid • be o440 09, the 4 , ;.,w , . ,,:; but •i' .601115 of the quantities of each lahesieal of ve0joilition of chemicals on the sdird mdioq d seeu w r.� 1 . The Stilt does not address the traffic Impacts *emaciated with the construction of the gas and water pipefinea. Xi!' ' I; w: k• 4�b b r•' rr•4 y , ` lo m, t ear �+ fh�r �rrreiKal state-ot-th"art anslyaLs► Sec ail as 1 ,*r � a "*, � ►d teert � t il�t• 0era4o- �1 ;' d d *9, Ya' a d t bdt MPOM , kho Oiebabillty of 1441mirenalt. It is likely that oven as event of 'hoe pcohabi 1 `It"OW Owl& aacur dortby the li w,16t the project* *1 ` ► � .An !iWl id' m Ah*s „* tihh X� 11 ' l tf so�►�d� -t �.� ;� " �i,�► i#�kirre �►�► d�h1�M 'f'�f�dl�pa�� a �rre�r�trsa d�►i �!M , ar :. r :rig l�► ' prerv�►dg &*tailed mitivatlron mend tob to mittlat• ear r+ o,, the caftsev"neea of an upset or a". 1dent. E•�, d,;.+rsy"f,�„ i ;'#';', � �r � is - , : _, .f. SA"tid"lart & I proltmin rp risk menagolilwnt plan and ,spill ' Goatiale1 ry ► Plas dhU14 bgr provided during roviow of the MB r yr1 in order to taxly evaluate the effectiveness of the programs Deficiencies noted In this sectien lnol.vd#: f ,: . . fte f91U.' debt that there will not be any impact caused by lrikage of gas due to 96pt6s,"Oshtion of the formation, Phis conclusion is based on studiss indicating few cairrsat problems with existing wellad Vhe proposed Waterflood project would twit-tally substantially iacceaso preSsuci within the formation and ,.,.., may •aau*e go* look); at wells that curreatIlf do not leak*' . ,..r. Mditioeral Studies are requited to derttrmi»M the extent . .,of this iewt and realistic ari,tig'atioln measures such as reaesling 69 we1190• age of gas detector$ in hones and x the mw of evacustion places must be pitovided. 2 , The ff=w should discuss the repast of five and/or h • explosion at the drill rigs in addition to those tapacts associated with oil storage . 3 . The *9I11 should discuss the potential for release, of gas containing hid from both the facility and from the pipeline. Hazard footprints should be calculated basest h ; r 7 'a048 R'IP:, Y + al Sadtdm lot 40t ttel euA #e use �. 4 �410. so + a letth �►laold diedtu► s . T {r �' � w t � ► #�'git &00 4"Ins eatooleas 4846 Uted with + +t'Aitp. ►Cations It fails to esXoulat• :{ t with ail epi ► t tb* loci Iity. kilo , I r> "i l i ty to In Oose p f40al tp to "' f cgs "t 61,pi , the e06610014.0 inal4ding pub114 I +► go to bassaaer, should be earlculated for an episode ': gs.( JPAA . $0 spMed tad aoatoised in tho containment , 49OW OW tboa clearwO up by vacuum tfook 44 she dd#d toile to mention the pxpeetod concerstrgttoA' of Nag within the gas extRacted team the well . since sour ' k gars deayts wl tbta the the MUngton► $tech riilds, the, sic quality- analysis should include, modeling of the L ,, . ,, �► g g of ��d tee rover r+eeidestt in the agent of "' � `,,: tis. ;•l.t �� 10s 000 of oxilt'. 'goto Pink as wvll as the previMm nth, did not quantity tbt Itude ag i ct of the notes rteaeisted with the, ^ ' Oft enttest of mttlgation Altordod by,.%kO ,A0atw ,*q#*uc*fj have aot� been been qu&ntlfted to O O.Z� d '4*t**Oti r' whatb9c Impact* hawre been rad'uced to #trs sgesi gi a�rntse� . dt. Us& of upseot ap n ealth and Safety 0. coastraation of a sa joc oil and gas facility in chose pe�oximi,ty to re,, idontiol autos presents special systems ..00�404 PDOAca• . the analysis in the tart ge nerrolly takes OF wcaach that its an event is unlikely to accurr, there is r 'r+'\.',,X,•�,1�,,lar w•,}�tT I'4M'1'1;�I .{1 ... .. ....... ., ., 1 ' + + �¢' 1 .:e r io 1r i 4drol seckiaa lose not a csss the rater JuSILty tohho gEa enter swOot due to %he Ra16466 *t „ . :•+; ''Ogle 6 Ivents et other %urea tss a1. �ii. , i 1 � w• M ,''W, ,1' , a 'I " . ,a �,°�.,�.�'�'�,;rt;�;�'�`��(�i.;: ;�;,fro;`,; ,,� '•, :.,:;: , ,. ^' � 0.6 �`; ° • ��� � ,� Is to identley t'" impact of disposal of .T r 460ortal 88"il*t With the ps $ �9ON W1 ,' .gyp'•', , y' �t ., t f• IIN tl6 address the � t the prcr ;': posed ra t o the 'existiri CaSS, � 'fear the � had rq e ';' ; "tr'i1 l •wry c t ;a'4 ION' : der* 4 4 apt *ddrOsa the flood lighting required �,.' y .k•���c,h!,,�'� rF;:1 �i fit' ��� `��r i'1���� �������• ti •yY i, . t« the OU only contains one rendering of the proposod Oroj*its It does not show scale nor does it bay* a Oesa riptlos of perspective. tevefeal scaled renderings .:r �r ,�1;,s► `.: OWTOM Vio"Otnts would n rtossax to assess the - � 4 F ''tea 9 x d6as adt do-t•cribe the alb � t quality impacts :,; W} �,'7r-�0% Ia id with cohst�rnCtion of the pat and water . ThO 8=11 also doss not address Ls. d+ tt-rtlated Impacts adted bi arse homeowners during the Initial construction 1 a ,J a' I yy L 1�a r , M1 1 . MIS to addrolls the consequences of the d. 0+ ip t11i oparetiao *I facilities le4ltag atootte at ruptori% and orectateift of tanker r*taring , "pi '.�'O� Wt .#lhae aW o4or $ocidostd t wooH be#e 417, , F. . y the potential to affect tb* neighboring residences } wmld execoibate any public 8e9etY ihPrats deleted with dam" to toeld*11001- Omlto.- 84 l'tlgatidn Oruresa�rsa rN p orri d is gores of •rotgoWay �F ,Rg"Vqvq f �. + saAr ,Ot U0.11WOO air' the 14to to ' '•' � '�►� MCI' ���� � ��� ��M��iot� �i� �e�doo� 10 of. 111146*04 "tlplf a P.issig ArroAts e flits , 1401ru4 Mo watts.., s 31ey Is sessolotod fitly the constr*uctise mW o ratLon all tbo Pew far ,p1poll" and brine ptOO110e. � SOlp fat31e to Identify the Mdter ,. ;O"Ity loth with the poOstial ruptote 01 the Vrr eiI easrpi the oil pr cwd by the ptoposi y Vol, k4ia�.� Mcan facility,* !►la wo erstend a the C � g"�uNt the, hrrr of rn existing pip04ne controlled by Chevron is ptoposedr the proposed project will ,ert4#less create a4ditionsl quantities of oil shipped l tbt pipeline and the release of this additional all Should be addraised. 1 : �•Y«ice r Iamb Y '} h .:gM411u _ I h •i �• I y , ry,t 4yy,''` ■ I Booties does set 40dwela the watee gmallt� Ots to the dcvwadra ttv •qUI #es duo to the release of oil# *e1vog4ki or othor toxic material . �i�l�,b:'Zf?('r,I,?Mf.�'j�d n'r/ Y' •r"A'.'!' •� •R .-i1 pr'F' n I 1l 1 7r'IR�v [i t: a $4111 Fails to identity time iNO&Ct of disposal of MOO* wtotial a*dmoiatmd vi th two prortOsSiag at jd f oetl ureter. 1 1 dNh' da'il• to oddcoia the f of at ibw pceposod Ml . .: atd'dta tl�e oaistlhg �ttt'd der #fie p�rapoired project.r !r k , :.�,4" � 1 { Fib`•. � •i r ri• r 'I'•� � 1 1 4-0 xd 11WS t addroaes ovi 1110�w lighting required aye\p by . • t • � r ' F r 20 the dill only contains one roadtrlml of the proposed pt'gj'tot 4, it does not show scalip nor does At' bivi a .y , . ddt+'tl.ptioo of r6c6peativo dsr4tal scaled weo rih$e so" V104w tto waaw hi �lilc isarf �o assess the ( '..fi.,•Y 1 ,'• � too w • op yr� 1' � ��* ;ems •. , ;- ,, r, , 1':j Uar does not describe the air quality impacts *N1690t*t4d xl'th constru+ctiewn of the gas and water 3. The, tits alto does not address the dust-related impacts noted by areo homeavners during the initial construction i r C7 104ts. she pslh does not address the irr"ota in ti ..4N r, • the actual WOO # not * r".; • :, �� � ntrsNp ��"� t0 dota�taiA s, it idoati fy $Pa cific wi tigatieri rrwea~sarar to tote*@ any Wrp►W$" 40"Otso ON poetieular soneern it the r01046.* of ,., Itio , AlAkIrl ► il1; during occidNnts and spills , as wail as the .►ocation a9 gas dye to the forr<essutirtation of the � �oraatian. a The $$Ylk frl l P, to identity the arc i to rr 1 a that Mors used dot th* drrters►loAtton Of significant* Ot iapacts. Additionally# the NeWtivefiess of the mitigation measures and the sigaitLcance of the residual i%wats have not been cl*arly d. Althw*h . thy► dNia doss identify various proieots tow our"160" UVO Amalysie, it camels to provide an analysis of the avrtall ,4 ejowlativo iapact, detecainatioa of the sidniticanas of this Isphbt and facaulotion of mitigation 0*6svros se 9a91AL90d id , ISOU60 15130 of COW The analysis tails to rofl*et tyre MlW tsnge► a!' suMulativ• iapaats portiauiarrly for ry0449 Sgfely, sal city, hasardous a aterials$ ncies and valor= quality. : 76 IM dpih Calls to address a full rings at aitstnativos. lh � particular, it dues not address the altecastive o9 prroe+tvsint oil at a sits resets tray the l►repesod project atdoo this altecdstiv* would substantially toduas the, systemo N+ ety. 1 Ot streoiated with a lira In the atorsys tooks. tt *1 • dood net addtoss the 100 oil storage Alternative nor dour it addir+sss alternative designer of the proposod facilities an thi proposed sites . Additionolly, the docwsont doers not consults ari altornativs whets the unprocessed oil is tra lleforrcod via a nov pipaiine, to the chevron facility, eliminating the seed for separoto processing fooilities , l •Iy�1�l �i�r� 1 r'' �Yf rl ,'�1.1 . r .� Tr�j'IIkS Ir s r I � r * ' r r I r ONOW �.'Q�'�nl l� :d Y 1�,� ! r "7'I, 1'�Y.'� �'S�� •� ,�'.� rrr '1 '� r H '��',r Ir 1 , � ► L ,�+r r i r0 gal 16, oil de lot r• tit .! o y, fir'• F � �',;'� 1r" �� C".�.,� �.r,• �r =M1�• a�: 4' f�" rl 111' r�;w•;rr r w j, � ,; '� � ,! � {fr � � �� .,'.• , VOW 0 r ��I•��r,� ', ^�114:�.Y � i.ro�•�1!'•.i �Tl� �� i•"^ h.II I�. � � � I t �;',��� Y — 1 � r � V ' 6 4,#rt` �, r , r• 1 a �y Ar �'Y,5 �'� 1J' T� 1 1, •I �� 4•,•� � 'r;}r f'1 �; ,r Ji � r I' mww 1• 'rr,r, r � � 4• '�• - •`�11••� �' i I�'?�r 'r; Irk;��� '� .., '',, r yr•�1•:i ,j � y�r r r f' .. ry +• �wpq� A Vu -.r, , ,+ .MT1 r 1 L B. .. IL 1 S9410 MOM Tp s ti�I 1 AWL N y NTA r .r �' - �• ire* v �X' � � a� ,r � 1 Mh• OW" 0449 a rrant w thi ttngregmed d •I� .16 ,�� �W�� ,ski � • ' $OVA III Igor ;014 P. w� WOW Oil 0400wety Okeloate 160 orals mom tod w4wi A y0t AT Ofti6egs, 41 1t tro"ltnl Stott wdor kh�1 ���� �';� �:,'�•����r�t� �'.�r,�' � � . M�r• .rirrlr r . err ; �r�� r�� �� �� • . . ,� 1 ,f , ►r ;r # cal r AW de Orr ter 660+ and: awn ,� ' ` l !!I►:. � ►sto No AWN prepared Orr. so for o w rone, ra ► ;•fir 10061 WA $tat* 49GROISO 16r ' sil Ned . #nr 177 roar irl r �wr�t0 grist• off the, do at: . the. i 10000t,fts arr spei#le c ats Various *object . E7 , .'•.;,, ''.fit .r J 9J} i a Ins 1.1•J' q r lY ICY':"',i'1 •r•',1 . I'depulted several larities to the Draft ghft .' WAft 11f equate in its present Y' V of f 10409s !ails to centers to Section 15123 of C 'in tbat the x""g Uduld include all significant IMPacts and mitigation swasuiolos as Drell as identification of ailarnotivea that could reduce. these iepacts to signi#ieont r 1� g; f*iit to list l'1. hig�ei iaifi ivacts .•I. r y iF Y4' M'r 'I ' lar tlhis ta" of the dole0ent� 'fhw ' cu ar ry does ,,i ,fit` ' ih a ilt 'Mattoon arehs or. con reveta oir lkiuss to ." �, n y., I„ i , tit: '}• � �'i '.�:Y "r4 ,.n G r 1., '•.r • '+.' 1' ,• . " r", ., 1�.i t01. Iftfp fot"W to add'iltia tide +t vi taniankai i4 uas ;� r. 1 okil or k Vktk the "lis .ru�cib�! at a td� P�ll�Yie"�* #r� 'tbe �,'�VIP S Cl!Y1structien �h' i firm iris avoid . ,hiVi the p��th l i�tl to arvote L tralffle, sic quality. noise ''And $011c satity i%ptate ' t lilt 1 are, not addressed in the docw ent. Furthen"Cer the Wakor -Utp 10"bts, are ' addressed shiu'ld the pip*rl ind rupture Arias aid" 1 + d r y ,gyp, , ,1 I� " . '11• 1' I �y�<<A�,1 �J a'/11 Vy�ry4ji i w� 'rl ,1 1 .�i !` '•�Yy}% '7•!.i n,• i .. r i I , '+ r ' ' - 'p ^°t i M' aatakrtctilao of 0 goer pipeline t6 tlr Char 16'clxltt . ii &Wrilb" � MWOg 1 t above o there could her significant i *to associated with construction of the plpelin• as well is the safety public p y S acts aiseoin►twd with potential pipeline rupturs. 4 . The project site is rather unique in that thfr proposed � driiiing and processing site is located dicectly adjenent to 2 ,1 Y pig• • ww-, �� Adw 41 14, IMPACT awmw or Ou" our J ! p"y ' I � sk, 7 V � ,yJ 71• � � r p�l3 On agcmnll F?Y)JRc It II � 41 1 � l , ��rr ,rM1, prepared fors kl Ow lilt A"agow Its i , 17 I q'L �i Am& CL 714 •� r r sS, W Y .' {{/i 1. 1-7 M• , ;} l4- W54 T-fH1LLiPt,vS1`EEL''i. 031" PHRUPP� OREL uu �� J. �►p$T?1! 1EACM, CALK. ISO' WX51 !!NAIL 8'frjw li i rp ber 26,,11989 Attz; Aut Franklin, Assmi.ate Plsturwr Ekmt.0 tm Bench Platzt' iM Crission Please be a&iW that I an &qaingt arW above q=L-4 nil develgxmt in the city of MmtimItm Beach. I am also ag inst r+ed,s won of set badw on Ui.s pw jeet. t' 2YA only thbig I am. not anal mt is building be utiful homes a:► this site. YGUO' IDOle I�.lei.�' ..r,y°}a'ilf!•e4�' �Y�.e�J�,�,i_.y'9/tlt J'.,..r,�7�',.dJ'-'+i--.e. _.. ..., . . r._,... .. 'III i'Mn r rr u r a y lr� • M '4 „h•• 11•' T,�7 .a R. r IMP *Wff ANAMM STAXV TAM FJLAC:H, CALIF. "613 V � 11 , 1. TEIZX" COVER SMvit L/7 ./..Y--.— Ile ......_.. .��..,: »r_ �y� � �.• —.�iJ•�I.iFiM._•...•���.I.r_�YM�i• w —._lw �• w+.I_.w aM.��..w�....\Aa.uYll�lywa � � I � 1.�^ 'Twum"#..m fa*wl-h .� •a.r.a.�r.yati^�. r" � rr��.ar._.� •_r�"i•�a+y.i_w..r__. .r.\r_r�_r 1�.�.w_+..+.'_w.rr��.w.•w..•i.w\�w r\. ..,w.r._..�.. .�..a..+ww��.� .«.ww;W. el 4 aP�1r_�,, 7:'NS�.1CY'�C1C►�" � /Ij/JJ //1 (17 • �IM.ww.N� t+M._aw�M►I.IIw1Y.....�r•r��.•� Y• ' ; ! 114AMM,_,in��ll�l+ .�� .wr��IwY .rr..wwa+.r.r� + . .•.-+,a rw____.�� +�ww. :' �+ .:\�'MI �,`'^7w,r.�,�^i• 'Yaiill".._, • aW r'I�Y�".�y....i.Aa_y_.. wt��\�•....w.i awl..•. ..��"...._.w. ...N.l•.Vr..�.. .Mir..n.Y...r�...M AI... 'I 1 y i, ��...i�l.�rY'����"HYi.�.l l w�.a"_.may_•'�� • a_� ...w w•_.0 w.�_YrY'..w.r.i.�w�.w Y __yr'.4•—�..w. •.• _i_� r � ". �Mr��..r.u t J I ,7� raj: • � CIT t MK C Irr IF 11111CTC!! II*twM.r.l�llf. September 14, 19M a 1919 A3Auna Lane L 22 Huntington K eaaht Ck 92648 BTr1WMG CWNS= AND COMM HERS C I R'X OF MMIINGTON HIAM HUNTINOMI BEACH O CA 92648 Door Biros Us IMURATION 0:' %Z=U PW Of OOTMANU AND PMSICTIONS---VISTA ML MAR 1'RA+L's In this co=trxq eery aitisen has a distLtattvra right to fit fbr and defer his ipro ,rtlish.Ut. 36o2osed you win f1M a dopy of declaration of GINIM MAN OP QOPAM YI821 M MAR MWT on Leto 1 through 20$ 1=1usivea is Blooh lMo Tate 1 . 2.Zd and 19. Block 9+L; and Late 5 ozd 6p BLaak 2004. 'fie Ampa Oil. Pro3eat drilling sit* inaludae late 11, 2 f 18 sand. 15v aloft IWSI Pareele 61p 79 9 and 10. should there be w4 posslbilit7 that the AvVa ail Project be: approv*d 1 wA poxmiAs irauedl the followl g cow an atA restriat.ione w3.17, be viaAsted* et al s Z t that no fens* or wall ohall. be ezwtdd or p uuitted 16 ie�au�tn 9*10en zee semost &d the front setback line; tar shall au r help iberein be peritted to ezoraii the height of three (3) feet, and no fWwe or son in *=&as of omen (7) feet in. W4ght shell be erected or Wat Omd on ' =V alher pa rtlon of any residential buiWag lot. „ ,o �t too noxious or otfanaivo trade oractly lty shen be aa�rr�e arM upon WW la t f nor shall oWthiug be 4one thereon whlah aq be or beeaft my -Vaus or nul oauo a to the nolShborhood, xa derrift or other struat=v deo2gaed for use in borbW# Alai Qx' 4 3br oil or nstan*1 8s dr pxeoicto ninetals o ,han ewer be p msUtsined, or penitted upon air lot in said real proper4s. Also. sualo+srd an oopl as of the request for a intments and tions of Abs former AN IMOTtM OMITTM aA the am ARMM "ted Xavealber 30g 1987 by MIN TILLAGIv 320. As ,your ire" these t1i1s ee hope ,you w111 bear in mired the VW7 tn Y Your . N XMY M. PAR91SH p TRIM111111118 a o s $ohn Kurdoak, Atftmey OOHC$0T11 It XMMOM IBM J Gear" Con7 lark sa rta 'J ...�1..M••�Ii0./. . YW,�•li•ti*Y.i .• �M• .��F 1 M�I.� y Ike tor" id• � d ' • 1►Vit M M t i. ' ' 1�1C. tl i ..tr l�.! 1 ti$ y� t ` tlydr�t � 9tMtln0601 $?Aeh, CA. IJ=6 Y� 1 arw�w r� r.n� :• i A ATiP EriEAAl ZAAS WMEACAS, the VM"rSl9n*d TUitth .'ILLAGE. IN(. , • C6rpnrAticn I% theL! M • ' fawner of the cert.iii'real property •wee E,ertieuli.iy dor►criwed a► fog rows: r toes I threti�h �o,, tent Ivsiw. (n ilaetr • 8a�; :bts 1 . !, try s it t ' f !loch I t and tat* 5 awd 6. 61OC16 ! vista Doi rear Tract. i it% shown or a mrrtp fOCOrd*d In WA 41 aqd 15 Of Mi sa*1;artd:§rs MAPS of (Warty Count r r California. .•+Al OWN tenors hereinefter rtfe►red to As ch# ',Dtclarants, desire to escabl lsh a V*rieral plan of Covenants and restrict iot,s affecting the r•se ar:d ott000ncy of ..p said real propertt and each lot or part thereof pursuant to a plan for Suanieid- iinl and 6�111n1 said Taal property or part tneraof, for tno nwtr.as benefit of, I' each and every IpR of said real property or part thereof, and the **"- or ono ass,gns i'M lia1, TMEntroitt, the Declarants do hereby declare and fit*blith ;he pro- . vi;ions, Covenants and rostrictions upon #no sub;ect to which each and ail of the lots OW port leas of lets in she above deserilod real property sh-all be Improved sold$ conveyed, user and held by the declarants and their assilot, cnd each and •� •� �} all of which are declared to be for the rsutuel benefit of the lot* or pertionr ` f 1 ' .7t• a lots in said real property and each owner thereof and his successors end wL1" • 3• assilnt; and further that oath and all of the coven ants or rtscrietibns hereby '.' • , � k 40 laud 11%611 run with this lanJ and %ha I l inure to and pabs with said real « ►ro"rty and oath End -etuiry lot or portion there..-J. and ehaiI apply to and bind + ,. I" respective s.rcctssars In interest Entrees, and ,are, and each thereof is, i*poStd upon said real property and each lot or portion thereof, as a mutual .y `• i SofV1111srdw ii, favor of each and every parcel of ;Arid tontaitted in said real pro- • ' i" � pretty ati that pr ail rant tenement or ten+aa+rint s, whi en Baia covrenants and re•W I CL l dtls n follows:err! a 1 " ' 1. Thot tro buildirrl, fence or ounce stretture 0all be ereCtedo placed or al or t ad sh any tsui telir,y N1fst in this subdivision well 1 the building dons, sre6- �t��•'s'� •, :t: M. fiCations. and plot plan iha.in9 the ;*cation of such buiiJinq %Av* been approved in wrrtirng as to currtlarmity pano hat.na,:t is( external aesigm r+;ih er.ist ing str..Ctart '" •i►ri''ry••:�; in the svbJivisidn, Nnd as to Iota; ion of :ne bui :ding v.itn rou;eCt to ta;�l,r.rapr;y • ,'• ehd ( eft; wh gruand *I-vbt i►o by ,M Archi ttt,tural Curn . lee car'•paiud of Donald S. { M'' -•+p ro. f> rtrs it. , Michael i. ,N y rxtr� and Ita�er r3erw.ng, •.note actress is as �fol looms, �a;r. 4 iju,1. �•�° •l• b � 1wr r r• ��1 bro4lehre►st. th+e�t ler9ter,.�aCh� t.l 1 feral a, g26�r6, or *y a ropresrretat Iw desi mated by a majority oLthe +4eee,►ars of said cowwittaii that In the errsmt . a of the 41*e911 or rot l'Rnat ion of.ony Member of sold tonne t lee, the rerneleApt nownro she 1 I have the authority to approvs or disapprove such ins i per and locations or ta'Wttgnit• a representative with .11he aathorlij. that in the ' went sold Committee 01 its dasisdotod representativo fails to approve or dis- "Oreve such is$ign or lev:ation wlthin thirty days after sired glans and NOW . r catl4n* have been SUMItteO to it, or In.any event. if me switt to +njoinr the erection of such building or buildings or nmaing of such alteration►,have tome comonced prior to the oo"Ietion thereof, such approval s"(11 On be required and this covenant sha I 1 be deenmed to have loon fw l l y cap 1 t eel with. the i thor the membersof this coawri t tee, nor its des igamd representative, shall be entitled to any cavonsot i on for services. vv'forwad purswmt to gees Coveewent. That the porners end duties of said Committee, and of Its designated represents+ tives shall cease on sod after January 15,,.2010. That thereafter the •sprawl described In this covenant shall not be required unless, prior to said date and effective theram, is written Instrument shall be axe.-mod by the than record *censors Of a majority of the lots In this subdivision � 00y raeor+dord+ appoint- ing a representative or rep►r*sOrntntlreet W tr shall thereafter e>earCise ter• same pavers previously exerciped by said Committee, 2. That no building shall be located nearer than IG feet to the front lot Ilmvie, located on any lot rm&rer than 5 tract to am+y side street Ilre, nor located nrsorer th4n 7 feet to any sioy lot lint end that no drne11169 shell M l"ad on say interior lot nearer then j! Feet rto mho roar lot line. That tto fence or well shall be *rotted or permitted to rewain between ` Lhe I Feet aM the front setback line; not shall any hodepe thorein k* permittwd to e. the height of three (3) Nat, ono no fame* or well In oases% of M feat let height awl be ergKterd cr a*Iat*inned one aay other partlon of may resi- doot i el peel i ding lot. 4. That no dwelling shalt be eraetad or placed an any lot craving as area of lost then )0294 sgwre feet. S. tech tall r+hich 11 built at a parr of the brivinal construction of the horns upon the propertits and placed on the dividing ling between 00 lots shall constitute o party wall, and, to the entent not InconsistRnt wish the p►erilioas or this 0oelarat10n, the To +roi rwles of I4w► regarding party %*Its and liability for rraportV dowle des to negligoms or willful acts, or errlssleynS shill app 1 y tlrervt o. 61 MW *Ott of ►wrlrsonab l e roof r and vA I nt onance of a party wet I Mal I be 0"Wed by the &Myers who Moko rso of the weal I In proport Ion to such use. 7. 1f a party wall Is rest" or domed by ,fire or other casualty, a" Omer NMI has UW the eat I may restore It. and If the 4thwr thoors thereafter 0*0 use of the wells they shall Gontrlbuts to the coot of restoratien thereof I r+ praport 1 on 14 "Oh 6" 01 t houl pro j wd 1 we, how"er, to the right of any sech Swore to call for a larger a mtribut ion from the others Haler any rule of laws regarding liability rer nagllp"t or willful acts or erlsrlena. !. .,Each owwr shall haw the right to go an the pr*porty of the sojeinlwg Soot for draw 1 purpose of maintenance and repair of a party weal I or an 05tonslon of 0 patty all. • �. tl oft 1 thst and i n4 any other prov i s I on of Me s Declaration, an coot who • by his milllgrrt or willful act ca"s the party well to be wiposod to the 41608rrts %ok i l boor the uhsio rest of furnishing the rwrcessory.�+tots►et isr at :lnst shah e i�riwent d. 10. The right of any Mar to contribution fm any other 0MOr under this Mle-atlon sho.i l be appurtenant to the land and shall pass to such Donet 's ofteasKv , in title. 11. in the @wor+t of any d i spu to ar 1 s i n9 concern 1 ng a party wry 1 It or under ..the provisions' of this pyreIaratise, each party Shall choose em arbitrator, and Seth a6bltrat6rs shall chaoso one addiilonal arbitrator, and the decision 50a11 be by a imajority of ofI the orbltraters. It. That no troller, basement , tent, shack, garage, barn or other out- i bw 110 i eg orteted In the raw l property shall at ants t 1 era be f0ed as a res i dofte %omi sadly or perwenently, nor slsll any structure of a tow"rary ch4racter be rood as a reolderei. - 113: Zlrot .oa mmiaw N offensive trade or ottivl:M sh411 be tarrlo0 on epees owls lot• W shoo l l anyth l egg to dome the rope wrh l A NOT he or Metes any +wSlbhrirrt0. tx ►,0sence to the nelsmeokaw. Ih. tasomintsof record are reserved few MtIIity Inets1Iat1on OeIwt a. .wr �1tn1 am IS. No derrick or' other structure designed for We in barlo g. mining ow r 'puarrylag for woe pi-o1V or 4611urei gas or precip s •Iwerals, shall ever be seceded, asiwtolooad, ar 1116MI 1orl epee any lot in said real property. , 16. That ft sign of any kind jahoi1 be displayed to the publit view on • am lot aftempt one protest toaa l $1 in of npt sere than one sgwre toot, awe *Igo of not care then five square feet advertising twos property for sale ar•,rent, or signs of any slam used by a builder to advertito the property during they 'renstruction and sells period. r � 17. That those covenantss with the exemption of the covenents contained in paragraph ly are to twin with the I" and shal 1 br binwdir it on all part less claletying under these Wittil January Is, 2010, at which time sold aowemmts shall automotleslly be extended for successive periods of taft ywais, unless by a vote of a majority of the then Owners of the lots it Is agroed to change the said s covenants in whole or in part. 11M covenants Wyntoined In said paragraph Ii run wi th the Irnd and shal f- be porpoto of . - l�. That if the. artias hereto or any of thews, or their heirs or assigns shell violate or attempt to violate any of the covenants herein It shall be lawful for any person or persons owning any o f- seid .real property to prosecute ' any procoodIMp at low or In o"Ity slailst the person or persons violating or attempting to violate such covenants and either to prevent or enjoin him or t from doing so or to recovvr damages or tither does for such violation. i9. That If any prov 1 s I aim of these covenants or restrictions be drys 1 ared Invalid or uvenforesab le, all other prov i t tons, covenants and restrictions steal I twain In fwll force MW effect. 20. That me boats. trailers, hoaso trailers, or trwtb,s larger th&% or+e- half tan capacity shall be p+orkrd or Stored in or wpm the drlva oys of any lot In sold real property, or upin the portion of any-lot which to visible from sold street and roadway. No -automobile, motorcycle, trailer. boat, truck or similar vehicle shall be repaired or painted upon the portion of any lot in said real prWerty which Is visible from the streets or roadways of sold real property. 'y Y� r' !1. cash gramme of a lot *owe for 111r"ol f. assigne or sMtessears in Interest thot"�1+1" »111 Permit free aatoss by swops of adjesent or adjolning lots to slaPes .err drsinayjs tool►! Iotatsd so his lot-Alth affrot sell edjment or edjalnlej Ietsv sMn ac•.h aemoss Is •ssontiol for the mointenanes of pop* • ant sta611184916►r an sold slapoe, or solnttawatM of the drolnogo focllltias r for the lrroteatloo and use of property other than the lot on whisb•tho sleoo or )1ralnapway is Irsatod. !!, hralnep easoo►mts for dimarsal of not "star are recorded srporstely. A aWy of said drainage essomat Is attached hereto. 23. A breech of any of the ammaawta, c"Witlars or restActlaner shs11 scot dalfeet or render level iri the I lotr of any moat" or rood of caret mmii ih pW filth olyd l'or val6s oa cal d letr or property or any port loo thmnof r tut ' I told emaroants,, taardltlons end restriesions shell be binding poor► and effective ahalnst ate► armor of swld lard whis■ title is acquired by the foreclewre of e y Ilea or srsrtpp thereon or sale err my ilood'of gust olvaa to seasrre the P&fmmt it tsoisey. 24. •. : This Qteleratien Is' sods with the Intent to ssto011sh a girweral •ohelw for the wee„ odmpwwy and enjoysrnt rf the rroyert Its and each and every Lot and portlest thareef. 'Declarant rolabs me warranties or repro sentst Ions, eiyress ar lept lode es to the bloding effect ar strfortteabi 1 ity of all or any portion of . . .;- this Arreldratlar, or ear to khs aaimpil000e of :ny of tovese provislots with pwbllc later. ordI maw v and regulations appiiabie thereto. IN WITWIS 1loftdr. tlr undersigned seerso obove referred to as %Clarence, haft called Ohl$ Instrrw "t to An otrtraterl this 1th d" of . UISTIN VILLM, INC. ryieaet ion MOrta i d Ay rs s. 4 r.c ' - wres i den t • i • 1 • �II to Owl a . 1 r. of i� •11) .or in ul' �C+�1 IIti111�11 � ' 410 oil? Io+h.0 wr. d•w�.�.��a.d. • w..., t.11: • p l 1•� w�1 Iftmr 0% a.• I.by "" w e ..1 for ..•/M!•rl dw ~U*4 d* SAMI"twyo. It-m-0 I« a• 0.. Io M* lowwwa, abw rt•wwal coo wobta M.•••w11►�N tweaw P no I•r I1N•on 1 IOwaw1••A 6wed •1i at i`•.•1sow .00, gor ) ; _• I: ti1 . ..• . Op vm. 04 1 • r •t» •• Y 1, J r' ,,F � TiRr ,,, ; , , ` • � ' k � T r'�IY�•".'r.r J.,r'f -3 one ti �• Y4 1. Y' f #�`rF�•• 1 ' 7,r • \.�Fes' ' 1 ,Y r ,; �oil Y T,r _ayj��1', , •• 1: I W r, t�I'� ''' �'� r,���E;�r!'.,r .t•AId LIB\�11 r`�R���+ v;:'�I�* .Yfe, Y r'� �'�' � Y, ?rr' � �ti�LF R, � �` - .�. �� �YR �'� ,, r 1:,`L p v,rtr � '.�T,.' �,: . ';, �:: -_. �,r�- ♦� R .Y �": 'rq •ter, ( 1 l lMQT0M BRACH ,17ROOM 'r J�Y'''yyyy.M AA��i T'•i� 'VII&..:iirA • . Y y . y 1 �- •' ' �+J�t•• ' :,f�dti' 'Ir.d d'Ir r:,„sr5�_ '�:r :rt' +'. � � �� o 1 Yi,J',r T # ft@ too B'ua 1 6" Ate $ohm s. *moo* b" to *at ft ALMM UC Ual a i-iftat I arrd ` %*'Tows we ;* e*v 9 wd rtrr► * � r is ift a 00 Vaost'llsto No& 4* Oftp " of �baol'�saomr r o a Q 0"*1. �� ire �+�+� ira a �1r emit to 1��•� b �Qer t�`aor�nirr r elbow 110 to Dol 1r ftacto fxsriIr ha" r*d ftwo foU*wlsg Thee moon of ovum as br ft In tevlr aw"s." A"biteolNft1 Go=$" ►o t6t tho above awed tz 1 ilaDob 1e d i L MAC 8tr *14 ft- dlNom JW +hp CA 92446 (2) UK BAWD 1030 Aw# . . P**C. - ' 18D9 C Stet, lMa UMOM, mho CA 92648 am new=$ Bllook 1ec3, Lot 16, f Apt c V L i ► t ttatin ton st et, fl` tlir t tINU&y 'CA 9260 '��;• rat but you vwy owl, ftr ors b6lp oa ftle trotter. ll 4-1673 Concerned Ci'tizezx for H. B M MYiW1Y\�1 rAAA.�.r�rrAAA.�rrrAY�.��— �w�r�-...r�.Yrww pit OFFICE sox ww,HulmrNOTON BEAC;t,CALIFORNIA 92615 1 W 1 FIN I�,•r " � 40 t'try~ . �" OF 74 ,� � S RYf � x •.��� �' 1• 4 / SON Y ion OL a'. n,ti ire I,y �Z• a ''o "w�'. ,;,•' � � � y .A' T:'�1 •',fir r� ,` L, " �.'�� 'I''.��,, ' •r.��A'�"" �'11',� � � �,ram,' � w i '� III OffAearr Irr Av tin Aechfteatural Onsfttas S. Arms� ' I *16 "$ $ officers do hstleby q*oint an their successors na following rraad is�dlviduale� � . I r rtram T1irCk �+rtm���r� IV AVPNM SIP4= 11900 f� E _ r 1 S1( l T ow MOM, 5. u r OfS 1 {{ J r � 1 i CUARANT219 ity Order go. TS000 Your R0. 300' 'variance FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE aMPANY it Corporation, heroin called the Company, GUARAY S City of Huntington Beach herein called the Aseaered, against actual loss not exceeding the lUbility swunt started above vhich the Assurad shall sustain by reason of any incorrectness in tho' ,assurances set forth in Schedule A. LI"ILX' EXCLUSIONS AM LIMITATIONS 1. h4 guarantee is given nor Liability assumee vi.tb respect to the identity of any party named or referred to In Schedule A or with respect to the validity, local effect or priority of any w.tter shown therein. 2. The Companyr s liability hereunder shall be limited to the amount of actual loss suststwd by the Asbur+ed because of reliance upon the assurance hetrsLa apt forth, but in no event sheep. the Company's liability exceed the liability amount set forth abov*o Dated: Septtml r 19tv 1,588 ?I1L,9'T ANERICAN "Tt; YNSt WCB C IPANY 14 a F. Caeaxt►r yt . Assistant Vice President Director of 8peclol Services First Anorle:vi Title Insurance Cu, 124 E. of th 8treat Sant* Am, CA 92702 I ! LEI �� �} y •� '1 1 ' . _.. . .: � 1, + .';}rr_ ,-.,� � �I 1 T1 F 1' N1 � ✓� f PROPERn O tt'S WTIC.6 GUACAffM yy ,. 1. Tbat, Aceo rding to Oe lest equallsed "Assesseent Roll" in the Offlec, of the Oranga Comty Tax Assessor t a. 7U persons lisped am* "Asseandd Owner" are shover or, the I1 � asasamment roll as cwninC real property vIthin 300 feet of the property identified can the assessment roll � as Asaessor's Parcel Number _ - - - 4� 1, 2S 08� XX, 25 dSS XX. b. The Assessor'a Parcel Nmber and any addrastes shown on a the assesnont roll are attached hereto. 2. That. according to the Cospauy'si property records, (but without sxaainatinn of those Cxxpany records nsintatned or ikidexed by ns"Ll there have bean no documents recorded subsequent t•.: AprU. 1988 purporting to tranafnr title to any of the v, properties liatQd. R ' AWA Y'T t'1 1 4. 4� .�„/ !� 'r.r��ti n ,.�• l .11' . . . 1 fi . ti ��jeY4 r -3 e -Concerned' Citizens for Huntington L041' t` PLETEfl' 3eacti= " LABELS -PRINTED 1919- Alst;na Lane = - - Huntington Beach, CA 92M :.2620011 C�2 - 52C:Cr�� _ - .. CmxtmE A� ICA€. FREE WYCLIFFE BIBLE .TRA' LATOR LIU JAMES YA-KO 1912 FLC I�� ST 14$ a=BEACH $L�1D q�4I FAY MEADOW DR NWIfffiTM BCH;_CA 92 $ - akANTiNGTN BCH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON B1:N, Ct� r'?kr� 102 _e _ 02S200 ().S20040 9EIVTL --NINA M BRYANT CLIFFOR[} E CLPJRCH FVANGELILCAL FREE _ 90e-'f'E . AV9E 20361 KELVI NGROVE LN 1512 FLORIDA $T- l HUNTINUON BCH; CA 9264E HUNT-INGTN BCH, LA 926415 HGr:TINGTON tCH; CA 92c4�, � 025200.4-i 02520060 02 2 0 0 S f V,-'tJ f EVAWBO--CAL FREE BEST CALIFORNIA -GAS LTO ECONO LURE N' TONE INC 1912 FLORIUA .S71_, 10000 LAKEWOOD BLVD P 0 BOX 247c� - HEI�+ITINGTON BCH; -.CA 92648 DOWNEY, CA 90240 NEWPORT Bkl CA 92660 02520061 02S20063 fit''�rr_a� ► .L• 4 JC:�S DONALD P BUTCHER PAUL O STERN MAR;IN j R TR 179 3I BEACH -$LVO SUITE 11 9613 LA POSAQA DR 93348 SAN►A MONICA BLVD # TI#-46TQW- BCH GA 92647 OAKDALE, CA 963* BEvERLY HILLS , CA 90*2110. 02520 5 02511r.00 7 FL-CR I DA APARTMENTS LTD WYCL I FFE BIBLE TRANSLATOR BA`LQNTYNE ROBERT B TR - 20151 *=`NEW W I`FTAI N LN 19S.91 BEACH BLVD P i i BOX 49551 -HUNTINGTON BCH; CA 92G4k. HUNTINGTN BCH, CA 9264E LOS ANGELES, CA 90049 02v2006S Cr25200E, B€ TE I N HOWAfiG CAST I LLO JO SEPH - 1B62f� BURBANK BLVD #271 . 20232 NC k INLEY LN TARZANA, CA 91356 -- - HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 92646 * � LABELS _,- 1PLETEQ '. 1 1i = LABELS PRINTED s_, OZ7 � - �? � ��F�T iTt �V ii� i i E 'ST DR SI T V�LEY CA -9 7�,.; ii= t tK i l N(STOf! DC_-H . 'A '�'..f�:�'� ���.fi � '��1Yi_��4 t_, • _ �t 6250211.1 �F �, ` •E, _Jtif iZ �',t�i t rr •T t` 1. uH, GA '3 26 7ilamT iTX .76iC- HtjNT1NGT13'", 3 :• ;' i , - C: G 1-i �1'�:�I�i I A T E° - ri '= _ -15514 EASE" MM `VISTA 2_72 COLERIDGE BR �1 ? JcS'•�i :F - - � - _ AITTIER, CA L}��' L r,TT{�B, Cry 907&-1 �����T fs:;::s t �;�{ �.�r . BLATHER'Y ILc- - - -TEL NOIW I C MILT{�r� n ii`.�i, !1Hl°• ,-i'�i I A. DIN AWIFON CIR - _:`�I ? '#iLC �iCR =' L •` = TIN6T SCH, CA 92b5 =,�_ L ::CAS . CA ` ^;,:��� F;��y�+iiiit ;_►i ��_.:, 025021.20 'wi.rll�.i,-_�il.� - ����IL7 -.y1;�1�F�rliJON i`l'! lW AM— 4� 1,"'�I li�1 Li'_' _. 1•I�I' �1 i.",4•�',' i 1�:. _i� • _ L013,_ HMTINGTON ST _ it ;T2 _,E� UOIA ST _ ::=" � _i'� _ w ••.w �J.` V� —f r f r. r �. �•a — •7 r� 1 i T — —! — :��_•--:�" — HUNTI t"GIT-9'a BCH, 4H 6-4_r Ft i..`,'4Yi�I N •� ALLZE Y . �_f i 12�t jr=r i SSORN JAY C CA N 1'e ALE 1 0SE 'f 1 f - �.ti�!_E UTI_CA AVE _:t_' U { I CA AVE � ? .''_ ! HUNT IMGTi:'." BCH, Cif 92648 HI IN{ INGTO 17 ECH , CA ` 2 4-- �}��1 A1: } BET f'�'__ HF� i f�_fir-,•. :I ,�. �,, '•s.4 '. 210 H> TINGTON BCH, CA 926 2 " R,-, _ t ,1� t •t_ `'#� l �._ i'I��:[i.i'-. T=_Li-ivl.', F� iJlt ' ;; ,`;i I.1 i � ER' L N AR[i r,LEBOW DONNA. i` \wy2i r•1� S � -'. - it Li._1 f"'3 i_i--= ^i~a:taj t`-1•_ 2� I BEF�Ii�h P#T C I fi E VIA i;N6EL I NA DR _ �ilA ThE . BCH} CT 5�` 4�., �! ZT S T 9r;•�_ i, t 1 —' 1 t F .- -. �_ -. - - •.- - .-,ram, r-: 1•1 I i .. Ifl RiT T NER WERNE TR � �r �•_RN L �s:: ,E.: _: 6 ' AWE .6672 -GATE HILL C:IR _ LIBERTY_ Y _ ... - _ _ I •1 Ht NT 1NGTON GCH, c :fit 9 648 i NT INN � i N �i:.:;�,.•ri, � � r,•r 0L502313 02502312 - - - LW SA �/ L � 11 ,yS t��-1fTT ES C 1-i- -�- - A -:S I �.•-:r. i� -Y1"^-- 1i4 - - - - '_y -i l_tLEFtNANCY I DEE aF i•=•�_. ��.'__-. .' � L•t•t� t_t � a_ r� _ Q _f1� L a.0 -i i E:—� ; t_c�i'1 _:'! SANTA -, CA -2 J9 _ L S AL.-'M I T �S, CA f J r i,�_ a-•_ _ 0254t3.4 - -- - 2 RANGE 251 310 E •-2_t -2•-'1 _ _ 2_�1 Yf�:`� =�rLi iHl'i ill♦-�C��Jh -Ei►_'�:'1--iN —''�.' 311 S-E-'•l Jf.1 - t! !j A r AM �� _ =:� -._. s_► �� lt . itt�:,� L.�C`• - ;i.� _1 1 f AL�;EiAi IF� i�T n_ _ _ _ H INTIH TO ! BEACH �} - L ELHI1C D�NALC MILT ON FN - - - .ALL _ SAN FRANC 11CO, C. 4 11 ' RE� —r E y 0 f '_ _'; - _ -t'1 -1 03104 L ` T E=PiRldFR tiF.R0 HAN'T_ TR'�`=i �.- =.it lNY0ER-_R0SERT- G t R __ r : :� ,1 �'s:`. : _ ' 1 � 3 -.-OCEAN MUFF _ , - - -{' ='T - - - - - HUN f INGTON BCH, CA '�'�14:' `F,:�iE: �`_r; �•�; L E,.�i; t =ti��__`'�•_ � 1 t u��•�_Ji i= �_ - �► `�s C0TTA LRITfF�AD 9RADY EDUARD __ _ - .-2f F1iV� ;3�! t�.Ta.: �. F 1 rL i=t1 1 r.. FOU TAIN VALLEY P 1A 9270S H ANT 1 NG i ON ECt r- CA 2643 ai`T - tt> 1 '�1� , t_ Ji'J 4': - n t 2 :�334 {tom=►3i - - -- - - RAM I; ARTEH I© R OLSON JUD I TH 0 DANK, ��t_,�ALi� _ 22.301 HARWICH Lt�i 4S �CAN`t'ti N ISLAND DR _ 707 1 1TH MT I!�%�M BCH, CA .92�E45 NEB PORT BCH 266�?CA 9 HUNT T s t�C i t�1� . �� `-' , H A o! w UST I CE DOR I AN BARRY TR LEONARD` j ENN i F En K 11? C F-i I Nir}. - -, �, t. , �TN, _ - _..� f _ t�GR11 Q?GJt ? _ FOUNTAIN 'dfiLLE`>{ GA '�27c?:? TRECHTER _ - — t f r �0:1 �RI �`' IVER E _ '_-A�� '=;TH+�L_E`�t Y Ir�€i;-Tilt' _ E-. !_i -_- - - N IELD _AVE •9ct;1 -C4M taic�` C•I� F' -14UNTINGTON SCI?, CA ' 92648 Hi'NT I NGTON BCH, w - , , Cry �2641 {,12 Z W rl K' , A. -WEW OHN- SU-Jlr-N S!j CHUN `,,is-., . -.r i �• s-•- � ••••-, 'MTIMTOIN BCH, CA 92,648 LA 14AIBRIA. CA '910G;.: �; �. - .-t,: ' =;►� - �'°�. _ � CHIIJ CHU .SH7N MC E_��T} RE_PAR F: �_; =j#` �:�=;_ - 9101 SANT-I AGO DR - _ '�_;_, rr.l irt•_ ( i_•CK DR HUNTINGTON BCH, CA 922646i 1 G' # O!v `' ''r f CA 1 •4 i f:- _ iZ i• COMER* BEVERLY BRAD:SHAW !�E�JELANc) Hl),WARD -. 13934 SORA BORAi iif' � t f 511 t:' irf-e_' # tl j1MARINi ~ DGL* CAE•r CA 9 f 2i # I#i�}`i�3k_ , i_r=t +� •}_"_ ',=_L i�j�- ' - - - 'C l= 025021 �t4 i ivV..DAN IEL WEEMOON TR L#i+ n"N T i 1',,I 0 J •r;;,,,: ,:-: _�:-: -. - �. HONTIN&OM BC4, CA 92646 "-1C.7MT E-46TI IN �L.H, CA '3.:.'#34 LOPEZ: FRAIW; __ HEIR rlAr�.'N r _ A, 91`E MC_ ELWEE RIVER Ctkl::c)'1 E C.ALL%_DEL. P,ORTE _ _ -�'1 _ �•�• -'"_ - - - - - FOUNTAIN VALLEY, LA 9?at?O ANAHEIM CA 1�2'_07 r!_i:;�;; ONG N110.1A P Ati�%v r`:':��i_E�!�i CORP 6ETji=�4 _ 1-t4�w�++T �T�1�FFC�t.K ST - ��;_ ,i=:L_=.R r;V fir_•, ". : : _.r r -.-. - �J i F-F-,L 7�[.7- �• �+A `•-Y •�` - , r�r -• L _1 _ •-' i Y k 4L µ)i�i. r• _^•--`Y- --._•- � '. f- - BASSt—TT qN � FL�fJe'• IF. LfiLEnI'i�(i1' La_'t71 15 tom'ETi/�it Cr=t1 L;I]F:F " _ �4JL\r ��L>� F^11. l.r� S ADf7i-!t• AVE Y!!.. t`J !y, r�iLSA P `fir - L V CRAINGE, : CA 9='ash 1 i���: i i i�v }}_:iV ut y, �_e'1 ����.'� HUE'1 T I F�I�T��i�i E i=H; Ga '� pc� �ji `244 i_:_=t)_ F_. E LVH M I ND—F,R `fr1•a - -t� T f ` ' � - _:Q CHEF� HOLTHAsJS WARREN E E 203432 C-ARL=SDAD LN _ =•?L, RH DE ISLAND C:I R 10111 CRAi LET Gn HUNT:NSTi.14 C:�H- CA 2€ 4G, ,- .J-STA HE:=A , CA 912' .-4E HUNT i N j=i ii r UCH, C A 4�;_..iF_. I C}•2S �-�d:cC1 t',2ri)_, •_.r� ti-'�i)='dam•_. i a. _Y•. WATANAEE F BERNARD) Ri.—'MEO ;! CnAWES TH+�,mAL. N _�t•I LA El,�,��Ie- i-i�� 1 14� F s:,n_}:,>}WF,Y ��::_ t�.'_C!; V I L: . �; C3E� =:t'•L LR IFOU14 T AIN . VALLEY , CA 92'i,_ uLEP r�^�i_E, �; 1 itlN' N(G T flrl E.C:H ; C,,; 5 ijw 7 I t,ORC:HES T Eh LN U.:*9 DILRK CIR _=S41 C':fEVY CH.-`"►==E CCU H ANT i N GTON BCH, CA 32646 LA PALM A, CA _3 6*Z3 HUNG T I N6 i islet BCC , CA 2_'646 VINC:ENT LANCE L ?EHNDER L13WELL G K=CINRALD DALE T yc E ACi��f ' AVE 'ti;6 i STH T 1 i �_=� =:r 1• i n "R I Ti iE:nl HUNT I iNGTON' E:C:., L A 9 -341 H+1i! I Nal�Ti�tti `�:h, YH F.r; r i it�.�T.y I N: VALLEY , EHRLER C'-i�;i?LirN L `VAN Z. L" iv L NDERSEN PE T ER R i 7500 FrO ETANC i RE' ; C _=s ALaUr'"n %�T z I E V;A���► F:L�r'D � 1IFIC PALISADES , C 907 :- tJT :�i4 2-CH, CtRfA �FAC_ i s i_..j `^t'�G DALE T� . r:YER:_ :��ii•fid r, GR i GEE° PY Lr;;?i�E _ - _ - } • 7709 -e r_, •1 r. � .r� T• �� .� r.,Sf• r-a t .1 1<•L T! 1 - 1 t 1 !- t•NNfT;: i•i L 2 L•� ti�•�iL 1 _ i ' �AL RD ,—);;_ L FOUNTAIN VALLEY .. L i 12 i 0-'F N!r'_{�PFJR T SC1,11, '•_f i 6 i H!1l' I 1 NIS TON B H , ` L,64 (��,,y T� ra•�._�t� E�.►i i�n�al a-w - •pt f'�-t� �- "'�t - ,_r".-�• n +' \ri 3Ij =1�.Z ( :f.tii. iIC'::•�1i� +.•} T•�[ •LE�• ♦ ! i. F'EF C� ARIEL !✓ �. L•Ln �!c)t_. 15 �iL•irti :'�jrt _T 1[)�=yL LCi LC fit��? i AVE rKQLL1ING iiILL'_ Ec"T Tiz• , I^:�h '� J(�iii :�"�l`.2 } _iIN E�t,m UH t_�` �_ i`=TC,I{�:'-;_R, ^�1 �L'f_ar z. .1 R _ � K CARA�I:=CO AN NE i-i:�i�t -JER �. r %1 L WAY ) E c PRlNGFIELD AVE 1 .-.. - :��•��, ._; i 1 1`i`S'tL•h tC'f HUNT-i GrON BCH, LN � � f i,}i�;i ii�GT�+tJ CH :�1•;=� �. 02 �r SILL RE ti� ;:.Cis hf '=F�` E'CH, C� _�si:�� `tj EL F —_ `7AlH_RE i RER Rai .-�,LQ _ ��-;LET`S r E=i T i __ P ' _BOX"9043 t��:'r LAKE FOREST DP 42S t�r� LE��_4:_�v �,�.�E HP _31 'r I OL.ARON ANTION i K1.3 i L L•1 I NATAL L f� :EL �t�Li 1 III i _, t ' = :—' _.T — 1 —. Tie ST �:i_<: I. � r ; ' . . 6TlNGTOPj BC'i4. Chi 92647 HUNT INGTOM BCH& Cri `��:1u:� :t' s T ii•�c� ��;�i `:C :�' � ��r LABELS CWL,ETED •- =5; t` 108 LASELS. PRINTED 02507101 _i-..0 1 10L : TTS ILL.E, PA I7 1 Fi�Lji�: f;�N ��HL' : .,� i ��`.�s j �� _ r ' i I t KAZANJ I FBI KR I KOR .TF�_ F.ELi-E. �PARTt�i1iTS _�i T't� �r i1'�i Y i i '� L—`�t:+:H + 44 43 E P'EFfiEFi CREEk WRY . 1_:r r, E.:Rr I�aGTC+P E�l_11L' F,Et =• i - - i�i;'s�JA GEL nEY, CA 9 :"291 f r,F...� t �:vk7. .�_- -� ' PW Z�;�7:1 Y_ . sA {H T � BEACH GELF EMI E T_�;J�� ELL I UT T i i LL I==t_t_� - v -BOXi - I t a: i t r' ' t~ 2 , - ' t� !EST ��` 1 t�' Litt `. �llit' - _tA g264$' HiXiT I NGTON BCH, CA 3'?��.i� H ='�aT:t��T ��C:1� , GA y"ter=t4�1 025071 I3 �'.'07114 ;? _ ELLIOTT &ILLI� MELV I li C i T�' OF Hs��:i I iy;STi=its E:�A �1 C. �i<=r L �:°:ii�:`i:T _ 19411 WO -HESTER LN _ !- 0 Ox 190 t T Z•r t• • Z Hill • T f w i�itA� T IMT-ON. B i, - CA 92G4G H�1h:� I NG t!JN 2C H• CA 92141 t.;l_�i d _ 1,N TON SC H, �-� 9 -G-AS' 01547120 _ _ 02150 7 121 1 _ . FOSS JABS _.I . ; - .,M I Tip •7;JG?T N A riAN" ROBERT 2417 WHI•TESANDS--DR ems, �41 i �aHT T E SAND'c DR :7t iir WA '►SLR AVE -._ jWTIN670N' H, CA 92648 HUNT INGTON. BGH, CA 9 -Aq ;iJt1NTAiN VALLEY , CA 92708 02507123 02507124 7 Lips FU3I TC� 6ILBERT T BET T J :HN T :�I:t '1Zif�i J��t�tEC U 3 HlaMlB��I y�T: DR r 1 c�E 7'�TH T 7I:=� : E��C�i=:i�C:H WAY f'i4?NT I I�GTk M BCH, �€� ` 26A9 MERCER I,PLA€D, *WA ''��40 AKi A =i"1, C A _�•3- 12,7 S IMPSON JAMES G C:At tAN SAG ►ODOLF�� _� TE' OLS N _►E 1U I T i� _E -- . 719 GOLDFINCH WAY r.Cti71 ����DrIC:r:: �:;F' _ �:c �_:, ��_Y�=�� I_3`�.;r-_L3�; Ah HEIM,. CFI 92807 H its � I�' &D I,� BCH , C� ���4� f��L'::�E�h F �•�.h , �;-} 02,5 7131 . _ - •te r � _f c - -�"� � :j�_. .71_.�t 'I TH NELEN 1 t _n R R N: GA��� ��=:��EeZ t�:.:t,T , ALDRIta 1 —B CALIFORNIA C,�' i r.:' �4 +:ATAMARAN AVE i r:�<<►==:h f F: �:`� ', t^ I�T T isi3TtJitiECH CA9•�F1d,� EKiz i T t�:.:, CAi i '21TEPNENS F RED N JR i��� _•'�E�A���1 EL I EZLF: S�2i BLA HEATH CIR 1 = — �. _ Ls��.iELL �:ii�i_ ; i L�:�� =�:c il;taE'T L., WE•_TM I NSTER�- GA S'?6f�3 + •t:l i s N %Tl- E:uf , , �•N 9�=`4•_ � ,�.'i � :,::� + i�rL L:.•;'i :r ►.._ -71 CITY 13F HUNTI.' GTON BEACH CRAG EtAR rARAi:i` ►.+yL=;:E VT I N-TON BCH, CA 92%64 t L Fi-::{E . CA 5 1 t r _1�1L t�;�•;-i, _ _ _ 7�C� � 27 �- �_cRL i!.1 TT ER GAIN ['� DEEn I i L.i lDH 1 low Tm* Y DR 9sw AVE NAR - 1 _ _ r ice, - -e-. ►. _ 1•i L � Pam. MC -MIEN - i•ARTELL EDWARD is �ILL_i:-;� •_ �_ � "LNG1L3 "rfL`F1'R4V . ,`—; ' _ �T r= — Htl+i IWT BC 14, CA 92F HUNTING TON ON SC �• CA '3-2'64; �L.� -02WS 02.50;t-114 4C. RAYS E U't�C�LEY � i�� i D t�i: : l �EiY L�_r`ii'ii d1 1 JTl Lid e� ��tA/�C 3 ■sy. ■ r� L s�•_��J! nEL.t'.i+l'F111t _T �,t: D JL L4•-. •.r,±��. /' } L _,,,p-l : a��71. .-YiRf F,j - 1✓Tl r��4S3 • zT • ri • C =�:_�J�'l yF is. '^j��' �'• l.� �? 'r•�• H�_fiTlfd� c 3l�i t��-�, -A .: , ,:_f+ E 1 1i1� i e�i t�l�C: ► 17 t�Ci] �i CA B 'M I TH HELE`y R 0 HR_i 3 JOH[ _ I f- E T 001 DE_AWAF:E _-I i 7= _ � ���=t :i''L ' '1 _, �y y _ti. •I L.. H li�Tt Ti `i �.' _ CA 9264E N�NT 1 N"1 ! t � •-,�i. _ , `,� , +, . 71 R IG ,iGi i►V 1 TR F AN' :fir :.!•LU`!1`! 17622 L+CtN L �C�Y. �•iy!_�F� �•r`L �4;niii:i H T INGTO BCH @ CA 3-2847 =2"=� T i i;::•{ i i�>;�� <<<V • -AJPWY EMMITT T KELTER KEV IN C ET �L. fiD _;}iH;: .J 0 BOX -27_ - 1 r 'GRAHAM PL s`=►1� N TI T B�.l'.r CA `3�E4:� }-EUI�T It�iGTON E'+H , CA 9'_` fV Hz itYT ii`ly T��i,+ E�f_r , II - k' FNiLLIn DARYL � �::Ei•3L�Rf C� CLIC", E 'i�! ; Fs tF:LE`� 22 PIRATE GIR 1517 DELAWARE � :_�� � t EF'=�ICL �:lti C-:G _ _ ^ - - CA y ;4 HUNTING•;0M BCH CA 2264 ;i��i� ; ii�is�T fts t�=i� , CA `�-�6,6i% HUNT INGTON BCC� - BHAT I A BUR I NDER K BOSWELi_ R06iER T LEE T R 11 C i=EN Z - I �'~? RANCH TA. DR 6912 4iCi ;�='=TA DR _ 19'_8 C'A' 1E'_.RJll A DALL.AS, TX 75248 ; UNTINGTON rC3i Ct, .. ,IN., , .,T cl ,_.h � r = z { h �r r -.- �•Jr f1L`�.e•. t�c'.tk'-...-F_O CLARK' : �GUYEN TRO H. TROY DIXiLt� 1 _�CALIFORNIA ST 1� � C:RLIF+=iR�iIA _:T E-�:"� RLLST►NE DR i T I M T PCH, rfi 648 Ht�NT i{�GT+�f J RCH, CA 92F�40 i�t�fi,T t�dt�Tt7i� ECH, Cis `��'S STEVELFRED T FLORA M KIN ON REV+iCAELE TR I i�!-;L W I L?1 AM a Ii•'S EA 9592 HIGHTIDE MR' 7S BARRACUDA WAY `�C:1 Gr_i_ ilt �.T - - _ it TNT I i+�GTi�ti B�H . s_ �'1, E.. Lr'��i! N.-; 6 H . CA ` 2G51 Uzi NT I NGTO ' RCH, CA 9—ZE_.r;.:_ r: CA``=;TF�hJt�4V h I�'.i�At'1C1 t1 ':1 i T}iF_RS T 1M +'r HY A li ill 1 t�HEE TROY- 4ONALD J S2722' ALLSTOWE DR 17~2'+' r EACUH BLVD i_31 E=. CALIFORNIA r,T HUNTIN"aT+ I'4 CH, =A 1":' •da N!_ r'TINciT+i NCH, CH )E.4i HUNTI.NGTkFN BCh, CFI ANGUS' PETROLEUM C'O P eATMANGHL=CH Fi"iRNA KAZAN.=I AN KR i i'i rR T R J _ f INGIEtSIft`e T i X.. VENTURA C:L.VD YQQ E F'EFREr� _=I�EEf:: %jAY i GOLDEN-,- Cif t 11dG i :�TEJQ It i 01 T , CA 91;�c.+Q ANAHE ll, i:s� `�2�=i?7 .-ter-.. ra � •� n► lr't�.. - • I'!. C �� i K)VCHEN- -j tR'RY G KAZ-t�[`J•J I AN KR L'r."'OR T R Arii�i�� INN 1"ENNIE T H t f • 2^ r' • 44.Z. Pt.F'r-'ER (.hEtf`. WAY - 2 1 4 . A(^J L I A A HUNTING T CPS DrUH, -CA �:. 'Q' AN. THE!M, CA `2 i-J— r�z%Sv t iv G T�N tfr.H t_ n �'t—,y . r _ G-`E_ETS Rii=HAIL_ II II AR i•iEl,"ER '"IL �_LL•JON wiL`:i��j �1 � _ t 74- 2 C•HA,F r **f} E - ' _. •� P "Pj+I NT LN lt� Ki r •(r1111{ l��ii'—_ ti•tbt•t � . —� 1 '1 i �. !'•.i. r�- -,r ti •1 OI AN7A ANA) L.;; `sue 7�,5 GARDEN GROVE ,, .A `� =QS i k��lt E i I`J�'T �•! ECF 4• �_ra ti�,�;�- _ I•i+7SLEY .i yME' �•iC i•iA�JHi i+1�. Ti3;►=ii _: ALVAE;EZ ARNOL-U, ' - .?t+::i1 }1Cf T%ltFt _.'i LSi : i~nt;i`,GE �i'ii 1 :5.-2 �3AW-SC IN Li ' :SEAL GCH, CA 90 i 3C LA C.R SCENTA , 'CA �i 4 �i �k J T i i�uTi-# G�=�'., r� 32647 - i` FOLCH L O REN" ,. ;N- ," O f !f f i ll.'t it3 Ut 'rj f V .mil ( .i-1+: FOHN _:4 3' %3AN R'AFAEL - 1 C' :=`5 CELi�.� C:;h = '_2 i SLATER ;�'E _ . . . t�'y COSTA[� T (����•••t� :+ --r. U ( F tit. '_ I ,jA_ MESA A 4r� 1iF 2.6 — — •�•�� ' Zif�4 if�� � �� Jim! 5-: — i t�i i t�lty � �� r.�• � �+11 J�� pw TR.W1L i GUG PE ,TM. lJ�.EC�ia CI!Q� SHER IN 2C 7 6.- GRANGE A�1� �c Cj I Nt7I AN Z 0,T _ 6971- LAFAYETTE DR GOL—Eiv, ZO 00401 _ Ht ;T i id T i ECN, CA 9226 17 L`I GNAL HILLY CA '_7l'�:�06 fil QA`!IG P CQRRY QE��RGE R •JR i-AiTi�IA�yN MARK R�=;'Ji.'Lr'1`i t�G G- DAVID CT --` 1-,t•11 CALIFORNIA ' T l�i� T;�€'F '� t:ALiF�_�R►�Ia c:T �-N} T I lriGTO�f Cif, CA t �F 4:=; H 1N T I N6T�►N BCH, CA 'fir 48 E-UNT I t it3 T ON BCH, i.A �:!r�•1�3 02608709 STEED n WHEELER BO YG i"ELLEHER M I CHAE.`-r' �� E E�RYCE AVE 1'_�� -AL _T - : _�i, C—Lir��RNIA ST ` CA. 9129167 - HtJN i?fJ aT►<i�i :�1i-i, CA `3'�`�4:1 ht' T 1 i--'3TFJN ECH ORANGE WILLIAM 7 JAN HARTMAi'•,i i DIRCK, T JR' HIGt3`=tiz�Jr:H :FG 1S20 HUNTIN T=N ; 1 :1f� n�aN-; ING T�t 4 '_T s_:;;_: t-UNTINGT" _T _ _ r ,Y. �,C, i fR '1'J-4:� 'Hl,* `:'f iNG"TON E`CH , ;.:H 926411: HUNT I'NGTON H, C.A 92-6 rt 1�`iT f Mica ,1 •H H tBAR �EtlE c► f=s13SER_T . i E`lEN. w ''HLTt�i; -J:-�MEES E 1.16 H.UNT.ING =_I;.', T l= 1=1 r 1i'. ,is ClP. �+- --. - -, - ! C. N -a - - ...i S.� T�,� �1t� G [� t-n '-s'r• �� H` N-} IWi t �N LiEr14 ! C 2-6 �♦��1�� l 11���.J , �{. `'l1n L'' s�s�.i t I FBI � 1N— ���! ' 8 •► 1 ♦ s QHAT I ...! „ t: ,-,E ' I ;t _ r+r,l! y�lli{�4 ! ` l _•1 1 L-�I_ LIF /'� �1•C i,- �C��a+l i.�i AVE — l j�•ai`y t-♦ANTC !ITA is �. I . �'-IYL --' . _ ' a3TF'N r•. _ ,♦., -.t �. �, Tf:� RC n � 1 •A Qf�LLA`�~+ - -. B H� in 7 MILLrP.GE S-TEVE A CAL`�A_T IE- .LRA 1_ AR' Y [ REQj�i�+tui� Ct- BCH, CA i :i� i F`;F: G=� = { 8 L � -s� t.�s try'-. \:�•-i�}._ -_:�! `7L ( ,� i ii�HL��=;=t RAt'iOS AE:ELARDO G � jFrrHY T EPH �.{ -".L ! cR u itL t `' i s(_ (� i] r t• { :si '��' t!�il!`!T L_14 r'�40 �J•! t I I�ftra� A rIYF Cl�L AE s 1 4,_ Lf,!:E. a. _ -'A _ _ f'r.#�. ` - - 1 A HUN i 11`aC1 i f�i'�I GE_�-f� i�.- _�_�_��:! �•.. - -- - SFAS �;'� Art I .�_-i TR AERAM ON WE_LEY R GRILL :� St,r�;'T - 1L AVE - - J E r rT• r `r 11 W4 ARRO C E _ 12311 w tFtA C;I r.:_: r t• { 'L S TAB A r CA 9�7 5 GARDEEN G OVE r GA 52E=4 Li-F� � E�H , _�U��t HU..LAWt QAN i EL TR• Ai'lGUS PETKOLEUM L'•RP i LEY 't"tFii=t t E C: "7 f l r ^} r a r� i r.J r �1�• vIA �}I3C,'+� �•4 � ��4CzIN:��t T _cvZ;' —!TTLEF� ELD U i- NEW C T NCH -4 s__�t: t�isLl�F:a, CO 4_!tLC}? ;-i:_N T I NGTON ►�:CH, S1i-i ����, it C'.c=tfy;Cjj j SC;HO ES •a E .i'3 r R ELEPO I: 6 CHAR' E:_ E JI, =T IMCNPH r._ E,. HF s [r_N t _ L ; 71�: N %sA �r�CiRr'= D F 0 �{?X z- i} r �� 1 1 r� NEW BRiTAiN LN 6'EVEr,t�` N T irL': : �H '�i : i t�ARG=f�J GROVE , c_;a ' E.il i�:_IfdT I NG T ON ui-i , Gia �r err r OORE- W I LL I fit•! �1 ELERD I INN =:i+,-51 E_• E -if '�r_i ••N _ �RL. _���;_ E 1 � u� < 1� ,•� E �ir. .:1I�i�•t F LIN t- 0 E.I {.i ii�)(t j ut).•� LiC�}1�h�F�t ._•T � ! i; GROVE -- 1':• .(ARD-N A 9_='4 H N 1: J. �-E:4cEL TJRU ` �E_ .I o N V xAME - c:�rl i T H '-f;>r;LTER •J PEACE KAY 11 _ 29871 WEATERWO_D 1-:1 E•2 P =:E,_i P:CiU I TA i i 4G 1 E 1 C:r.;'-; _T 1 ; }' LAGUNA N:GUEL , CA 2J.. r L_ _ HLAi•1iT.�.,, I-A _0f�i;_ A� . i E _ If,, ' ._. E FET4EL 1 RE T ES Gi_�!�'_' LL�'�J f 1 i,�=i L I f�O C:-{.JGLe~ } 17401 _;E=.SEN C-:IR Cj `•_ik sr•_:s 1 : •j E',EAC.H i=,t..ti1D ,yITr_ N r- r i T O ta: '1'Z •-_ u r T t.-. •` ri r. + .. ��r.._ t-'. HtjNT+fa.�T0N S H , C A stir':?7 �'±t'f'{T;N(3 1#r,: B1 ; ►1i-3 }����r , ,t. f 3 T L f4�T+7t4 G:.'r. , _ �r�4_. MERL I NO 0 0 U G L A:=• .j �:1�i1{CHI COD !, =:LURE R i CHARD T _ 18==s1 BEA'CI i C:LWD _liiTE- 7721 C {LSE—ATE AVE _ i rP0RT_L_A-N�7 CIR' HUNT IiNGSTON F, f, ��� ter= � WE•_TNINS t ER, 'A 92 �: H ►vTI��� - :rC:N , LA E� C=Z�t.�_'�4'�.!-= r)ice,�I)'3:;(i:y ►)'?�t:}_=i�t)c E'i: :�I '= MA�-i�R '= N)7i���:EZ PAUL I NE P B%ER•HT)� .TA"' •= ROGER R f- u_`c'} •F�E►,`�CiFi IE 'Lfd F f RTLA�'�L: C F i�� 0_41 b :i EE'TWr. i cR C:I R HUNT IW 10 SCH I i�€� -. '-'i k+ _ N�.FN T 1 N w-rnpj , 0--H t CA 1-648 H NT I N��T:;:.� ;,--H - CA '�'��=4E, -- �� - - ---r-` -i a..E 1 rF .1 v .�a_J RIODUE - CHRIST 1AN K _ AL VARE:_ Alt-FRE11 , I�16 :RI ER�VIEW CIR. _•r 17TH' ST APT A �_� `r. F►—T—t F T CN 0CH, CA:92648-- HIJiY ! I`` G 1 ON Ki 1 ~ KID 48 .IU ! �•i? a t-1t t , —A +��rs 1= ' �A , 1 t to T.NG T N ECH , ..�, oil • �••�i LD_ �L^r1•�l.,��6 t's'!, L PANDA'H;�}� _ 1 tL, LRICHARDS ' LARRYW MOTG MER ARNOLD- L 17�1 CAN -Cir r aR : r ` T ^R -HUNTi�GT4N BCH, CA 94 7 i f.1i'l s I NGTON ; (;H. A a?'��+46 :zf•yl _ DENK ROBERT A '_t�I TH fit tNALD �; T R i1 C'U'NELL DONNA .: 2-1 52 P �RTLA�IQ �:I fi ;IS —L P RTi rL � C:T �;;i C F► : t�i. =T C 'NTINGfN BCH' CA Hi.44TING N DF H, !---A 52=1415 02509416 CHG ALFRED'-C. K I LLAM AR,I D R% ;,-, D-r= :N 1 L t 1 t ,i_Li./1..C1 Ljt! V _ t OU 'NDHILL DR 'DALF CT 10 Tt 'EY CT WH'T T IER, ' CA= 90*=i:�1 F_:N'�RLCi s T�: i�1�: �`':�'`� ''._''" _.'=, VAI ; �.'r �;�; =�'3� I - �DUFF;� WILL.IAM T F��'_:4`� i.{E�'�NI � G T�� :L�_E�`Ict' 1 _ -�3 7 MAPLEWOOD C:I R Ci r. i RA I h�B iW C:i�` _:� !'=:i.'c-�� : - 1NT1NCTN EH �� r, CA _ F:►s;i• rAIiJ '-Ji~LLcY t",; 92708 :�: , . .i�, ,-02505422 a'- i _ LGAVAT -Sl l.F��'i:.�FALL...N�;I 6cEF., �_.T���LE_ { ,��..-.� ���;�;t sr��, AIM 11'7�iTlV C Lill •� ilJ;.1 . �.+ 1 i� _ i ! _ L`s_'�i i—!_� .�:1 L� " �_.i SCH 0 �A `�:�(�l;F. li}I- ! i!'r J T=!'e .y i i ►_•r i _IL; a ii'1'' i t'•cf, •- t.i _sy J� ^i•i rJ�a r r r ti r. i t 11 -r.�r Irl i■ I r l; - �'•L��L,� etL��•r01,N 7 RY �t.•L 1•/�• D� L•i�•i ;•:i t•�i!'-l�L Lr�='� }��'11y• Tf i-}i li•'Z`~� ti- -1 - LDNG 2.04- Lift [, t- ._j '"..T__. La! L .� s j r _ . ; —.r r. 1 _ • .. _ � / �. '/ !�`:IE`1 1►`�i.; 1 I rE� L.•:i l� �..:-: 1.•_►�1+�r il�_!ttii T!i'J'.7 , !Ei'ti L'� ..:, , .::i =._%i.._ .-� 1 l S i U)t PAKE 1 r 220 it-1 - •_I ! f� .r-�j "- _{'•I..s is• �r'i LONG S4.i , •;a �?i�: ^t—.I iJ Vi-iLL L Y F '� i 1 �`��}.,� Si':i:�� j i s t 1 't ri ' -09AN LA --=PAC_ R' R M�, _ �.,3_ _Alrl u F .l L_=-- - -L. _ [i - =r: r r..� rr"., S. " _ r•~ J 1—`:1 i ` r1 `tt {_t - - if!�C_1 :• 3 ' T I i C�- 92687 i='t_il jl�1 A N VALLEY , .� i'I L:'` !_�r.`1 ' �'. _ _ i.�rU 'NE". 9 TO- �T - _ ic1 1S+ LrZ L.•C �'�s.. L'3Z 4�1_4t :Ic +i ?R__HE I GHTS7, CA- 9 } !R INE, Cr? ".3' 'i LABELS •PR i NTED r sfEI ETA- MMY BOLLE� L�� ', MrAAff �� J% ice i. 20: �L/�.jC_r—y Mom•; i.a-L•• a..fl L S!•Yi.I�'i , TiN T i BCH,. CAS E N,�ANTi:�u T ON Kli . CA :�e r�fJ i 1`{.J `T r:��'s VLSI LI04 - - �•�L�ii4-:11�� _ _' W71 f7 VE CHARLES AR 1 R _• -;T�at�� CR_ �=..��� 0 I _ r: ''i-I s i ;fH, - .CA '�2��-�f WEST[ iNIS I ER 7 CA �j��ei�.� �[t?tR � �E.�V . `(i _ _�� } i i� cKqw- Fr P �� -, C1�4-_ �4�` 4... —LH L I T�L�r; L• ''3.-,r_:-`` ;., W: I LT_1 C_'L S .4`Cit'UZS 'CA9003� xtiEWP:R L-C H 'A 9 .vti t-t►�i:. � ��;i= : ��:•, c• _ �. 025.12110-. + iE..i Eii� r_.: i � f MALVRK ; � t INFLOtErkk i - HLWT T t'S i�'�t . VF�I _�iY L �Y/ E C 3 L7 1 j1 ;Ri-.i i �i�M�.�. ! L _. _•� µ � Y. .:m , 'A IN' a CE R Y - _ _ - _= Ur1yr ��T wT�•i'`E;�"`} - a' 5ri� = u}.'.� i Ir = Tn; =N 1" r'1 4 h t. T"►'; .. - - - _ \'t.._a 7 Cl LITTLEE `JrrO�AF! Y L' MQUIRL RiiCHA rfl L n _ _'�r; 5 KOELN 4t+ '��j�.� + t►ta.L+Ti ! E�1i�`t#!'I��..lii4 DR _�ir. f 1 �+kc'ST: i,El '5�, 1': - - _ hl= ii i:i4�iT� � >uGN, �H '+'' tsivTi;�;�',.: f>t7_:9 `f �Y{-_FCC .1'1 IN-0'F _ L i* i.';r iv _ AVE `:�-::f��,Er.ts _H-R-' i%!_r11 4 E El T.-iF mac: 21 }T i EF:�:te�: . E t = 14 G•tsri 6 ;er 'Y-r i t�� i_ } =� j i Tf?'i�'$ }i; �h 3���4F_, _ - FFOUNT, =i� ti% aLLE`r' � 7i 3; . - I s;��' �_�=F; . �:;r ��; .;_I 17/ L •VfTLi,Lj . �}�� J'_'_ :� a�%r'.L.t�t-:i{�e('1✓��} 1\L� _ ! � :r.:_'�' I t. I rT ''fir •1•!a - _ •- 1 I .\ 1. A , -T '. 1 N �i_H j� -CP a 6AS, �A N ��AR,1040 y CCA " i i-t'i . ri �3i-► '� • V�S12.S�L? .-. `�it�.s �•� ���� -. �� _ .ate+_ � � i!� �i .i .�Nii_ �I. �AV i IU IJ'Tic .AC. L W*'':1.._A.N !.l�[�r j I . t� �- = .�i is E i 1:_:. =i` : � ill G'[l��r �i./1� � '�•L - :•i i_. 0 iV`t r.�Y' 1'L _l,i _ 3 - +j_� j - Sir !iw 7 /�y��j�••� - h _ _ _ ZANTA A�'�A CA- '�270"' :NI��:C1 .~.ikt�y l.N t_F_.ti S��l 1j� 'N , :F-;i�a � _ft j �• _:� . {_.i '1i1_•C�r1 RCINALI) r I:._I ': i;_IPE := BOX E,'94 t+�. -:72 D��C�'L:=c�. Lry - - :-f! r'f'.-INGTON- c9vH; CIA 9Z-!541 ��� �'if� �iT} �, i�M, t '? �_:�: ;i_;'rlT-i41�T�; ; tt rr�� ii El-i ;E ''7-LO;. :L 1h fiNA =�;+€GELA% H �';�;-i,�t� �1== . '. _E. ty .. IS H ST" a_•fi 1_•�•- i.� sr ✓�F_%1= rSr'_ _ } CA �� '��ti a"TO, '373� BEACH PTINa � � �i < i!•c__:,�-_ : ,;�,= = ; s tC—'- _,t_-F iE tr ATR i C�K ��ERR . - F}AHA E_r t�AN I t_1'- n,t 2"j n DE`AfmA iE.. •�'r. �•.����1�F 7 •-►•tr?r_' ,�1 �+ r ,{�''� F r _ y a r ►'�:JyTIIE3Tt�*1 ;";�k� Sri": ,, �a$:� !t'�ir'��1ClE l.rly' t�_��tfK ri^1ty '-�jl 31;i`�L ' l� - a` r V�7CARS EAR;. L �ANW AI LN iIT IlGTtiN �; C -� - _`''� c:L 1 �, _ T NTIi+1GTON EtS_.�! r.l •f_.l f_, li=.• L ri f Ot+' 49S2 QAR JCR yc A. TOMI TA '-HTN Ti —14 F , ref`.{•.:-:' -f1 - - _ �yE_tNTIP: T_ii'�i �c�:� c, A .,-�:� i, . --= ` l'it-i Cj=L • •I� �i.,-•_�T rat � — A _ _ _• _ �T' 1 - f�.. _ (RAFT J ti'tJN F INGTfJ1V SC i 1 i-!�!,-i v�1:_i7 �tf..i _ _`-t•__—i i - _"7 _-t _ }�1+� . I_'/' �`►�Jam'_ - —_ !!. _ L I t� �•L ` BISHOP EC I L_ E —— — — - — art, a� "UN Lit' E LPJ l-'.J i Lil _}1_3._{�T.' - - •1- - - _ �il_f1TIi=�Ci T r wu = i i. �� _ __ —�•_' : — _ _ L� n mot.�. 'r E;`•-� �.` -)�. . =11 FL�1FiI�r� L r _ t e:•vt ) •!-'1 _J�rS+LL'�i i-I•_ 1` !• :1 i- f{ 4 �'I_'� -.-, -. ,- •,.� - _- _ t =�Ij. -�. � � :' II912Y.-S.1 13 9 HIGHTOWER FLOFSNIP-cr- PA 160 1 C-[SPAR LIN HUNTINGTIDN 0 2 S 1 14 2;_' FOWLER HOOPER L 11-3.2-7 F L C C.R I D A S HUNT TNGTON BCH , 'Ch" 326,4 14-5 "TACY GIORGE-TTI ." IHN ALS, NA LN p L UNTINGTON C-PCH . CA rat VEY JOAN't--4-E ALSUN,-1 L- N Pa . 1 T K.01 K r-'EAN 22 MASEL! ITUNT I NGTON BCH CHANG FRANK K- 7 L L( HUNT lNGTIJIM "SCH, CA 92C-.49; FAGS_ 0 D T A, 1*914 L14 HU"':-- INGTOM 2-C-H . CA P"N za I 1 -.Y3 I Ult 0251-3 1640 DRESDNER ALLAN 8 NEWMPIN MAUREEN 7 ALS-UNA LN A 192 LN ' , HUNT INGTON H, CA i illf N T 1 Ni--i TU N BCH :n-2 i5l, Hi LRIGG ALAN B�.�r'i�i== •�EFE R�_-: h I•i 1 •JC"-7--PH, M�CHAEL. R E T A 21141 MIRAMAR, L N 1—ITT' AVE 1—_w L'�%.L T - - - - _- i >t �.,. - -,Lc HI {Ir�T T L t GS i !11`4 Cr " vi1 +�'_e �,._i1•.; t, �, 7rar_t,_ r,r . `' T i:7_"a;Utl�i _ C I:'SSELL C.ARL i T t: i_T r"-L G� _,E ' r11 1 i _ _ -. 1 FL%tfiI�►1T ;�' � µL:=:E1i��: Lip! ' i :!N.- __C••1�,• 1 _�i ,HUNT1.NG N, ti l -, - -ALL KRISTINE .-i:i �_ �i•�:��_;: �';:t= ;:�;F;�i �=� t�►=�i1:�;_Cr T .. •.i - -1-• •t:'. - :J' - •� ,tT ; i LE- 'IN Sry ! l t 'I i r; •� 1 �"t TSVr��-i B0 1 CL t L_0';.Ci. `'! t'•f �'': ' 1-' i F i` ' • r'1 r�r f �•_ }L� v�li�t'7 LI\} _ <! r-L�!�t•rYi 1 i'y 1 _ '_ rl�.. _•t',. Lr aL:�::- '= �:. i'�Tir iEh E�s=.'r,• _. . _ .__ ;:,; j. ! '' =,y L] _ : _ rr [Sr^ rr t � 1Efit•E I-{ �:i C- -4 i-.� .ti 1 i ;'_•{��"aL` t_- J 1- !L� FL'r ��A = i - - = ��-�-"_ -�.id _ • '_ _:i: . i L '_`.::3�.;_ il`•:`i'. t �i'�'_,�__:: r i . _=i _ ,__. - _ .'.T�.'a'++ { i+i` =-!_-!'1, L ? _ �:J.i1 A`-+ iE=L Li�7 31 t F�{'lYl~ (_�' }•: �,.r�7 —_ _ _-_"'i.'S i' J 1 ,,i\ `- �4' �.� E i tli: Ui�'•_1= �_ - = 5�.�.�' I•i' _i.� 'i h 1 i_ _. ._'i_ .Z:'L tt t''i ty H�l� TI�'�f�T:�i.1 �_::_ _:. . _:;:_ i,i?i:i ii` :_ ii_1+ _�•i;, _� _ � _� _ , ti =:i' , j t �•_•.�t`!f-i4.-t' t �'�}L, _ . '!i':—_i_i-i.`�L �i�; ii'�'L: �•i�_=i•':-:i' r=:� �� ! i"i:';i-':' _ _ {{ma�cc �� •7 I. —.T� — •- - f.i f F7T`:+`!`!r'i 1„ �•_ _ Fi .�r:+5� i:i - - - -• �t.l L;-�: tZ . N IN f 02 HMO KAT E E -._ , . Gis ARIANA -.1i'1• r(\1=1�sf� �.- } ^ - - n.n; F,!'1 ' ' - MltNT MG c��.i-i ! =r !� T UN E.:--H.. i:A `y-=�=' SILMAIN :iftiFRY , •,yC r Ir-C, . •! ti_ �.�i-Sr`� �1'��•i'�i.� 11 t �A i+l i`�Cr�•i:'�r�ei•� I'17'1�•V f VL IZ F�AL.c�t.'`!_I L-I' 1, C i! Ivi.,•;-1 f"It_ i�:i:"1 I _ � -'i:'- -i -, _ OPR 1 AL AY • �ii� _i�:1 i `: `L�1 i- -E 's"+`'—' 1�_ _tI'E=ii• L. i •' _ r-1+I i` 34 12- {`►� YID f: L'_•i , ! t'•_�1`+ I 1.}• I li'•; 1_, i l t 1_•r - a...�=1►+J r_+,_ _.�i`�-_' 1!�L_ + !_1'i - i!�=� i � �=•4 ti. k i!��: 1� i �:•} •_-'...:'j Lt^- rtr � - (':''-" _�_ - . i-,;-i:', i CCt^' L �_ hVNTINGTO N L'•i•I rr . �� _ �.t':•r•_ t t'�[j I :I'•Jt�• ii`•, c^ •ti _ _ , .! r., . A f. L.,.J L•LF Sh i 1 .!tl'1 u' �I`. !_•�-lf.} tl _ - -., v'...2_1 *. LJ D ZE L i �J iS� t L[�l.• . E�!Q �''_ f �. 7 _ v�.rr,� t -l.•.� 1 ``.f,�•1 !-)• . • {•� __ . 1 li , 1 o ''R^'r 1 l i�'•i V{..il �t'� _ —r• '_' _ 17.74 i N-I i l`��i i s i�i�l. ! i .' L - � .� f��] i-1 ' - -� �!�:1- i i.S-I._`�'C I .�' t _ i� i _� �•'y,�,=r.L:��♦•LL _� - i ++~i.=fti•F i 11lJ Tl�h� `a.1 T _•{'i r�.;, ,lj.j r•��:. ��ICE? E-1 ri: •_1�._ _ _ tJt_':`� 1I'i'� !�1 i'1_.i / -•��^ �t�tt •tee i _ i ,_=_i (;!_. _ •_= i. ►_i_i`7E !!ii C ".tisii` i lR f } rj� i T t S`+_�+ •+i 4r• t. ,yF..-,''•.'. 1-, 1 •i I_ .�, t t t `t v _1 F f�1 L1�1 .? �I L!-v! - .-. 1 �..'r 1.tl'� ! I�t 1 1_ ( �. i �i I__F �•ALI-IN /.. ,.rl'� ��.�•_+i.•�� 025I342175 f11 4 6 ._ t AGEG E�..�EDW,f�lRD y�+i j•.i_'�J��T` !:t��••EFV !."1•_'��!T'_'f 2 V�1 _ 1C�i� .t44��:k�fFt LF4 -'y 'I '. 1> i� . .-. r:+ •-- .•.:�. r,f ° - - ' j T. ' E 1:� l _ t _ tom!_-t_a s. 1-i sj t :.: 4t?:'i L!'ii='. {� � i H `�'�tJ4' H'U'"T 1 4u E.f'.H , LH Ji_.4:71 14. lZ i ��T =7���=•iaCa i 3'� Gt-1i.1'•1;e:_Y i•} 11_s• uEL '� '� t 1 r s„ r• s r. r ! "•.f�! r�•1Lf"i!•' :•t •.L i'�,_'ri��_•' ~ �iti r C'--• [ '1•-i' a ';111•11 LF`a� l .�f'4 Lf_i�, "'f -j.- ! .s to-CHANNAN it i'_�irt;ii'.,_ :J _`i'.`�Ur:l ; !l` n .� •i L.�J:'•i:'i i = i_ i i 'I. A L N,A i nti _1 L:ii 4 ! ! LNG?Tl � 1�'.!. - , I'_t'': L•=_•:`, _ �`' �'_ ` s!T r� ! C. �,! " ! i!'.N '. J. +JaFFisRO LIJN. L : _ -��� 3 1-,'f�_i} _ �T ;ir ='Y LJ.H� — - � i=.�� } f, ,r� i i4i Y a _'_ , - `,'- i -i .1 _�_ _ _•i_ 1 _I'.�_ !�'" ! �lsL LeSIZ • i•ileN i N6 i ON Ll�oii f �I: i !1",�_ _ _i-3 _ s'�-`•1: ,=r `.t_� y �_�_ '� i-�'}i L H.'L_ _ -AGA-MS TERRY ' �: 1 r !: _. Ci-i:i i=6' ==RAFT �;=ti•1` t r 1 I'1!' t'1 /W�WELLS iF R IC"i.tl,K f i�l'�i'�i'1 1 ' �i. , !I'_ei._:S it ii.. ,�}"•�.1(if l a�`V i i'�i-'1i'= -.l� _' J . •J•_ V `s_ ! 7""i�'L+ t+t�•_ Ci I— i r 'f nF�'^:r3l-fC�E, :�;� •ter_;', _ �' ; ! • • tzYi f•. �; L4 •si'i T ii 1,r i:i _ AL O i v}'.�T L'FiLC[t Eft _ if 1'1!_i':� '_�•.t`r �=•.t i;i`�tTi~ i:.! =_i -R.s'%(3 ' t i�7 C''i(_ S i,' .'±fll'��-': 1 T NT 1—�- -.n r�f• !•-- H�� I Fi�t. ii� v'1t{, '._;-i :rir'= _ i:''i`9ri `l3Ti=3 ii . Ct -4y�. irs:ii'! i:: # i_1; -H, .i-i j. 1 S,.�L ML;--iqN !Yh1N E <<L'_'= iNEi IE: T `I \f T T l. T 1 —.r. 1 _ t _ _ a _ { t. •• 2,6 tr r2 �f T�jl byre{ r� .ri..: 'J —1�'aI't ! Ziff.+ , �ti fi.•L-i� } ice• ��Jt, r a .S :� 1 a(f;mot _i� �'�•s1f _�1i•J =i �Z -_ - - __k pt-AW-. - IM STE a'S ALFRE2_T _IsA 1i,}E G ;;�s:,,�'c;__E t1L�,t���, I :t=:��T� , . . N �O L E W E`FEED M T z 1924 DELAY ARE 1'��'y r' _r-!fi�. �`�!r = i _ � _ r-jt_l e'•;� _.T �# _ ar r st+�i i i HL IY� I Ti Na C l i '! {��' >� Y-it � ' I 1 k rf_`.;• L,• :��rh:S i SC!t, �. , TIi1 1 E<<.. ,ram _N, k _ , r, H _•� 0'42'y 1 V2L• `,1 2 •- _ _ rBAL OW IN DAV M "ER �:L ! L1;� ;•� �=;T�►=�� �f:A1 i x L-L 3: �1�91(5�(GE�.LA4� i=�tyEL ETC, -s�iG •_E '.'i~ _ AlL!A`E "T HUNT INGTON ar- : r�A r=` F�ii�l�. i s�� { .f^ �•}; -1 L._ !' Y _ t 1 1•_`i•! C%3E T�E.��tt Cc��;i::E �'taFis;.ERM" ,�t>>_�_�T I .1 i 1�12 DEi-AWARE 6 '1 . '} r • _�=F '%'�' �.'/ i .,._ i j=i'i E- H ,\ i_A 3 215 r� _ ELL.I tt1_IN HAR 1LD k= Lp =•!•:i,iF:i'--. I �T.:i!t t . i•�r?: _��� is ��� i E+i'i ;�; �,ram: 1-09 DELAWARE t_T -.• r -i CS ^ 1 )" ir-IUNT IN( I fiN Ci'�-�1 , :H je215 _i i"E'•?N T: M 1 !ti'� Ott_t i 1 �_�i i�_ '-i i i 'i% ! i i`%lam •f i - - r t_ _. �— I _HAY i'I ELA `;I�:t ':.ii�.' i_Hi'�� t T� k_ t_-l'!`�H: ;'? t ►�•t=i i L' 1901 A =.t:N,lA Li ��,_ r'��'=:t stir Lx,r _ _ �_��:-= �'__;!N r'' i;1 HUNT I NGTON R L H _ A '_-f'':�4:_ tI J;N'T 11,1GT1_ii`i L�t�i�� t:!� �.`►_::: i�'_ -T':NG ! C;`1 i::�i E 'r€�REWAt� ._:t� i� c. i•i i ZE!_i_ ``lr:i= �•: .�:�i�at� F!Fr�1 . .— '61 -L:I N T O IR !OR 1_-'t(_?'� l t1L�'� NA ,Li`•� j f l i : ! _:i":{M. "1 9I2 BATON ail U*. ,. I A -7 t J. 1 t t ' !_r`' � - - !_� r . 1S S- rs-►` ` t r. - - j,�, t i�_ i f 3 i k�(4 L \ L•�i ?. •_ ti}} i r= �;i 'y t `!-.j HARK D L/OR 1 Fri= a'*: .. _ :'11�i1.� r 1! i_ L 191 ti� All_`•�IN k` i �jt` AL) t�•l k:'i I HUNTING TON S C;-i . Hi N 1i:i3'; _N PARR IS i MeH h' t.i li 4�t�? it 1 L _'r r' t_1{_'� >_'J x I i—t r f •ram �+ 1 �(tL �j '• .j}�'t .� J ♦ � = �.. ■ � �.F�V� �r1♦�k� LS 1; ��T`_I i t-,i`�T I`'��\_ 1 t_ft`� _-•�_.[`^ �t I=.tT`�i�r `• �\1 �•�' ' '-'�`, r� . - _ - • 0 Si420 �. �0-i, CA r °i_ HER _A - - jr_.I=' RIVERVI R ' Lk::Er'i-at�1A�=�; T 1 l..�•. rEi i.i , l l t , f.L '1 CH 025 14 c04 - . .. $ALLOU f1A_MER T .1 l t'IAt'iE•! —• 611 Q t �1l`'i t �.jC _ _�tT=tLt�i-'tLt;- L Y" H {= -f_;;.:• 1 l{E 1 F i EW C 1 t i f�r�)'�{ �'.i 4.�'' �Y ` r..r' , I t�ter. e t A HUNTINGTON 2-CH , CA j• t _#`t�7 t t_tlli Li1_: i•F'1 ��':Li+� -� !#,{ lY-; 0,`l D t d' s-••-I !� &ADY Rs-)GE T E-f'_.�- ' 1, _, , # CAS T4'ERVIci�' ^:I �._i•; # t_�!l i;; HEE_.r; s T E i CAt_t1-i �i�_�;1 ;Z .i_1 H�i i-_,E', S `.1; 02514 q - !l , i . GEE # tiL;�7 I CClI� r! LL vh I i•ti fe_I� f-';�'2 �:.i:-i,-%_��.�-, _ f-ttJl:1 _ :A. TINGT N S H t C l •~ 4�� ~!-�itl T 1P4G•:1 i�Y L_ •Lj f•n u•-1~ �'-' �• • '-;_It•.� (' 1 0 2.514,:14IRIGI ��1 .�1•lt—L•� •_•i�:1 HE1• j��t_t•�r�=sl�� i.7�•;'-!i`_;i i�� j_ ,r r�Frr ! �i�1iYTt"ivG'iF��`• - `;=.T = . _ _ '� F'� ;-� :_� L}�; - {, _ i:: pjLiILL ��F i L 1 i i_t i t=ii_f,, a t-.i? -71 1 :11 _ �=1= •_ri _ .r 7 rJ GARDNER r rNH v - ! ' �•'i i._ i i- I i )�;i i i F= 1 ►1 { e �i — — ; .�:i,; ;_.` _�`; i=''_ :• ' si _ -'`+`- i?'_'i; ii,.1 31-13Ni'•�t�, !1, •`'f_, ,' '1 f 7 _ 42•_1 N>UNT I MGTt_t E-t-H, !-A �`;„1 Y;: S •T ;{ i_Li • ,: j _t t i '."�-_ � +_y }-!i_i i•i i �#t;��i i�j t: L;t:� r... ,��. t� - i �i-i '�•s•— 14 12.*2 4 — - — — — SELL; W'S Ri0's-.�1 a !•1 iEN rr L j +! �. 1t t •!. '. [ :�,�#'i 1t•�.� t_�♦ L''�. { t�i"� _ a.l_:-:.{ �i•i�• t .t, 1 -• { L. ` r.Z`1'_ j -� �- _s -•AWT IN DENNIS K !lnRc_..'HAL_L D0NA'LD E `J 1 LL Era AS F.1 CP, RD .J 619- :OCZAM FILL Do 1 0: NIL i : ; �E L:I�i -F _� ' , ta 44 } 1 1 I' I N CA 3� 41:I T v „H, _ � � P '_ t 02S.14- ^ `'�='j�-' = = = [sue HOPKI S YIMOTHY ����P�a[f: L-i E1�_ F:� i':=;i'v: E�i'e -- tk H IE06 HILLr.REC,-T C:i [::�'t_t:T �•'R � . . _, WNTINGTON EIC:N G. --._ , CA _�i=•4:_ h; 1j:!i 11`;L7 I i i�`; �.i:�~, [-3`-'i = A_r Cir-H , CA - *Ili S-I � _ '� t = �t� _+i[t�`�1 't ! iF:i' ' '>>'4::�-t .i_i��s 4; EEC F S• �f I�I L`�•i1L•_ .H. L i L•[:C'�T i i T i -•- -I�.�I`�TIi�GTrJ�'� ��[: 1 , _r� ` ?_ i�i� :i' .3i=:�4 �;C:�� , �� ; �___ i�' : Ita��i�=.N '--'C :=r= 'y;= .:s'- COLLIN-_ MICH EL r' '�I—ij—r+:t-1_ ::' T E '• !! ,..., ,:•, A — 1 _ 1 !C•_ 1'E t 3 ,i ::Li'i1L t_ E EL R -1 _ # (� _#� _::. i 1t 11a I 1; J i_t:v 14 C j '�.2:1-[:r_ -_ l (��y��•-1-• T 1-fi -.1_ -�, ._1 .-, ., .._ _ -ter � .}0 iE'_!1 �i I J.J 1 1 1 _l �'.. ; '4 L L.. i 1�'S �_ i•_ -! �''�•i 1'.�.•�1� 510 OC.:EIAN Hi LL L �? H U i i r. : LL L% V.!3 1i�4 irl .ii _.1_ !` - - IJ _'•Y 1 S-"{�.� i I�!�? L•�_i , i-1 +.. .�- 14l•_�1 { 11 1 i�.1.. F !�f`Y Lr'_•! {11`l F— I_CKFORD BRUCE }t,i�H�. _ —'s i='t=ia' � i 1 . �F. ss_ _cam`` �J _ _ _ i` ri T L _ �i L• `� ` f� i f LL ��i! 1•� -y_ `- _F`;.-j. t - t _ — !_ _•L.^.t'-is L�— ,rl`•` _ HUNT IM—if-IN 1_ N _' -3 f 01'41 '_'C[-!. , .ice i�J-►.- - SC r= 1".)A, t — i:—s= 'i : LEF _ —` i— _! i L�.;�(—ii!tr J = �� `�� ; • • Ar H i r�F� e l L_' L:1�. _ _ \-L•C��!`� r:'•.t._ t.'! HUNTINGTIDN c: e i , :+ `_�. �� L�_� � _ . , ,�i '_ :•_ ;tt'iV i L:.tom B' H , �.14 i _ 02-514414DAL = ��_ � = = _:I: i r• 1 � E F : rhE _t t :LE�T E =;;C:E : frl:.R1 to -610 CIC:EANHIL, .6.1.4, [E,•E"�' �iLL _ �' n r It } 1• .J\ TTII-T-• r.11.� .A .� �.I EON GCli 1 'a�rf c .7a.'� '1 LCJN 2tih r `.• EJ��'f '� 1�k:��,� i A!4�j t�tl+ 1 •: f J 1.•:'� �irl�i'�I - - _ r� tpor ISiT• yDAV 10 PN i 4i Gi�ii JOH i•�i'=�N �i;'� C'i-��':� E; E::R':DON DALE 61-6 -OCEANHI LL DR i i r;i N T ANA AVE #i i f:_: i = - - ANI N.'.'• i N --HUKTIWITON BCC - A 92:49 �1� i '4131�G, Ln `�ijI1L:'� �l % 1 Li��l'ti !_i'a t�_fi , t_i� _ir.+�= 026144720 4-4 -MC ABE ED 1 l '1 M -3, ._ • T 1.1 1\ I..__I1 t �� r. ter. =sRlEi`7 1411_!iH}! HU fTIN�TQ�i i?��i�, �•=i :`tt_ ::'.'�'� ! {' `a i I ;{. [!�`�, f_f� :_ .IS }�i-e - _i E4^ ,n L L-'l.I1Y tlt-4 1' 11'vL NP HUNT ING 3N B-CH , A C_;" 51-1-15,�_ I- J l-RKLUND rIRI-S c iRT 1L��`- -i'� !(1��L �'j :':i AMBER ruj i' HUNT INc�T}3V S'C�;. i�; t,•- _:, ,.�+, ; B'CH r 1 t 1 7 1 !\v 7i . - t ' i - '';'.i 1 !_i'. !_i v�- '+-'__+'-• wry/ WEBB _TEr HE.N= t:±•=_tL�Y ti i�:'rtH! ii _ _:r.. G" _ S14 AMBER DR =1 Hi11B`ii uF 10 n11E.tF; DR l'� T i �7 l i1Y■ L`� 1 f'� e`.' i�. { I . �:l r y.:1=•:�'_ A I i`\ 1 its 1 _'4 HlUrl' NGTt N H . Lea r . _ !.; LI' i :. ��:H � �.r 4432 �,{ , DE DR t3NT Ir�� 1 ��l`i J \ •� �I.�j�i } N6 t { I S:`� r'!_I , f�I� 7`1J=.4' E INKL`'; EDWARD _ i E: :_.1 NA kV NICEN T A s I HUNT I i� T�� � SUCH. = �1a; Hl;NT T NT►(3 __lN BCH , ;t;._!i$T 1 i�'OTs�it; 0 2 51144 .9 0 E7,1-44 } HCPSON T HOMAS r ut.'�:EL J's=t_;=i � t1,-L'iL�lC�s� �;��� N :713Nif ���r�1 i<.}ii F.� ^ . . . lw. •r . �. — n — a tea r;-.1 . ri 1 �:�4 tii�NTliaV i iV Bi.i'�, .H yam'-14�2 t i.� l l lti t.�?{�; `_:� ��€-? �.:���Sr* k lt - - FARINOLA THOMAS ►11C`i' LA WE.'_r { :, R.';Ct '\.ET C;_:, HO 611 AMBER DR "TING [ ON eCH: C:A "HUi�T!i'G TO �� C+=i� . ��; "1���ri; :_rA l T A ;DNA , f—. '32:tj5 - 14 S Cry�1� =<<_• R€CK60 L r::t.� ;T f�:'r-4i=ail '= =► i f E t i•i==!t•;t=:�'_= t��� �E I` __ f � =EANHI LL D ►-.: _ VIA C:.'.R U,, H:ILL DF: T1 ! 1_; t €,I I, ;'; G<_.ti �H ;7-. % €�!Y'`i 1 T' I1� S I!it F:1-w H�IN! NIG 3 ON eC! . :A 1I 1 .T !r-,.7'€ -l� _ _ r. 1 _ — • , L t}41444_ '��.•s '� '_ ice =ft E .•. I-IL.� —. 1_-•- :(--•�.r,rr�e + - f '��� :'. !7 fr .. ...fir.. . r - I , gr-':)WELL r L t ! = ; 1:�.i'ti r i=:s Ix F;` ; t.� : I.1�•L= i': , t L l_i F'1`�jjl!0 �TT•I_I`X/, 1 i 1_It_� [Ir}i.•i:�•f�1i' �•1'� 1 •_:�i t•t�^i':C'{-�Yf �•T i t I HYT+�! -1• 1'-. • .. •i .•- 1� { 3 iT• iL�`•_€~ . i-t a=k=4 : I i•.`i'. I 1 i;'� I i_Si`� {_•l_�s , _:;� .:11 �1, ii`.aT!{:,+.� ; i ►{,1 K' I 0251445.1 DEP i I F �J E T� A A 1.'-1_ =+i- _ • '�ck`�13�[� Lri=.l`.!CL = �k-li'S=:...L L i C7 0EJ.'Q1 1 k,_• - 'T,t•C' 1 �IL �P. t -f•1_ Lift •_ k_•I�•L �€ L•_i: �. . i�.G.� i s.1 . H1 , �-_ 1k -- -, � _ �i_r II IL •�7 Y.T-t r� _ �• � - - 1 - 11 .�. ��t .�r.r . y— ..� EV t 3 ` ..a *-• 1 •� T�1r1� 2 ) '�_7 f :y• /• 1_t u j`i �`. r a_•I u it 1_ ;11 fT���t� [•�[1 ��.'�1� l�1 1 '7yi_I tf•� 1 Il.�i I � !� I ���4 L't� ! � •i i _ J'�i•_ 1 ltr l v I � -: 3 L:': -�:�1 y 1 t r C t K OEF'P ±iciiri l L .-1 r'i�ti;;i�}I f•;•., €�EH 't €rt _rid r : S i C.r: €;O rl _ rr _ C. i C. L•+.t • \1 r. - [I'j r 1�� r. •,,I •t - _ - r, 1 1 ,f -•t r. - HUN � i 1`y:]Tj E.i_r _i-7 _ f;! f 1.'.4'3 i I'.. U�_{J . "•iv4'_t l l':Jl� � 11'4�� ! {^14 FIC_7 , C'H". 3 Y, ,t. .. R ThCL ;`i N N I C.�H',;EL E 71 C E M '1 LL DI - _ f-1�{E`t€ T1,.GTE1iCi �.L1.1 , CA .�..:.r•trl:: ii?.i{V � I��!f � i�i�i '.�_�1 `'! Tl`! CrI� ':�1 --}- �! � , i'.3 i _ii L•\.•:�I :1 i�++• - i�•_ 1iT_a. :.�:ik�lj��_1E`: f�i 7 w r. * 1 r _ --1 — r r, r — i E. ��L.EAi-•ir►1LL. t_.-: ; ��_ {:{�=cFit��HI�L s L 1. • `i +_ =? ''. ;_;d,- •_!i•J t 1Id'.� ��t�'a F% H . CA -2'_,.•_ 1 �%f: ��H �'� SAND OVAL i�t`* r - (�.-, �•- -,,.�,,t t !.-. r - t, a _ 1 R f Fr�i I. , 1' -ii1 ` t. (uf��f ET� 1` t.El^,[.7G � C�1:I SI t-!i jti' 1 i tC_ 1•-.�.r�{:�. y�ti -+ { L Y�l I -1f•�• �..�Tr1Lt 2 L�i t_j�! _ a_I 1't i Y 1'�F i..l€'t I A Y t- 1 il_'~ ��_•7i'.E� _L+r �!,! �• r - }{ " . . _ W14TIN iON SC 1j '11 1i. � ' I�i:tr .1,.� l—t r. � l— a- — _r1 T- 1r.T -.•`1= �_ _ - — --- ,L—n i ..3 1 I_ �I •� _{� �a_ _ � I•� S I L1 L {. E•i .y.�.'!- `.r'� � 'r1 4'� �� DONALD I,�ARD ��,,r,,F• = 1_iE'� t��;.'_ ;�LU'v D � —! � _ �1 It1�[' T ► I _ f':,.T ; t_r.R_cW LL_i: i`t E _- I EQ3 LF�bV,E'�•I uE L.F-4 a'_`r".r. .W 1 = _•k F, %+ ! ��. :: H�'i_�ili r�. H}����T Z N6 N C ! t G•. i�H ` _ f"•�l'j ! i �-,1 1 }�i`� L.t'4; t f i_, !�1/tt 1 ii�F l;OlY Ct�+H, ��.f-� 92 1•►-_ •may rr�r .��- a v 1 1E 7 aZl4 f�,s MARL ON P i-4p—,,,,T 0= t.}:F," i�f�;-`• ' >r! `= r" i h � t i L F"i:7 i ri `t.� ICI LAk'E~ICE L�� _ ': =' LAfl.-. '_:�.;iE- UW 1.= tit LAt`:t'_�IuE _ _ ITT:•a. _ _ ! ` fit? ; ��l J �,1,= , . _ , 1'4 T i BC : - -? 4'- HUN i tf L of^�'♦ _�- Yr:tr' •it i_�R) �''r i i}}}tote-= 'r'ni-{:1_T{�t� =i�`.'!--N PAT I i' ;�_!-',-ic:[REF _T AI`':='= 1; . GOV LAKE%.iGiE LN - - t _`_, )r, LHi.`=+lvlE Li`{ i '_)j�)I ' -�T C�l HY� TI ?�:;• WN! i NGTON RCH . CA I I I' L7 B'_41=_ _,•-:� .t,-; {1_44 T ti 1 R c HEIs`-3ER :�:��'iE:F ci. tt{'� iSLATER _ • 1 V d 0 1 '�'v C� ;i I�_} i{_.j i rC�i`Yt r n 1',`��::� ! •�R �-' FOUNTAIN VAL LE.t , t_A 912 7,t_''_' lH;J r -{', CAN ECO CA LLOSr M lWi i i i-H i L L i '. L'�t' �l�r�(: t 1 f��•Ei`r''i ll_ 1 i i t i 162"�, ttiitiE IEW i.''Fi rr' 4TV F.,! - E{il X t-•♦ ` —1 i . t �.�—•1 ..� �•-`r ,t'_ �� a. TT•r'�•,-, a{`t C+ • r l l 1 •f'� - i�=.•."1 ! '.]�_�l` _, t , �i� i %, _ 1 i {-• t 1{'1 a.., { •� 1 cENESC 4.•i� r tirCrT�✓1��_ _ _i _ .=_ f '!t. 1 E, "` _ _LC r,� T �:. 4 9- 'i {T is'�ii;� _ t +_; _ � t. i�, . Ti, _ SC 1 f _i 3'=1i- `� !+•7- -`r'--i..: :'a •'i i i ,1 "<C t ' , t '- ..ram� j HUNT LN } f}t v .1, -3ZA J iz1ECI:s R Ili _. v;•-:�'_1_ :l{'1'•� __ f r.=:i_� Vic•: l.,t�it-t:'' _ �.r-•