The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutZone Change 88-11 - Use Permit 88-25 - Supplemental EIR 88-1 (8) Avtho,1164 to pubhsn Advert,tinriienis 4i all hoes including Pubbi; tVt�G noticef by Decrod of Ilia SuPar161 Court oI Orar►{te Gow+ly. Galilorn►e. Numoot 442IA. dated 22 5e01erinber. 1961. Y1nd CITY ATTORNF-r. �.(A.?Aa31, doled I, Juno 1663 011194?0; HUNYING'f og 6�ACN I � STATE OF CALIFORNIA • �yM' �'� ES County of Grange pubbe N1,640 AVIVEM ro "Vwal 4 0 k .q or*840 to so M l Sa wM ." to art.cw.~-00 1 3m a Citizen of the United States and a rasident of the County aforesaid;., am over the age of eighteen years. and not c party to or interested in the below f t�li10E..'•�: Willed master I am a principal clerk of the Orange, Goat DAILY PILOT, with which is combined the Lmw- Nf 1MS-PPf~SS, a newspaper of general circulatio►i, ��TO I printed and published in the City of C :sta Mesa, srlatTNMETQ�t . County of Orange, State of California, and that a QI o '" "'170 "a� Notice of n or T E t3F'1A N of which copy attached hereto is a true and complete P copy, was printed and published in the Costa Mesa. 6W.LLY:-L0CAT2D E TWEEN ' DGLAW' N9' Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, STINW, To o Irvine-, the South Cus,51 communities and Laguna lt1uT�N� I i �Oach issues of said ne►.spaper for 1 tine I consecutive weeks to wit the issue(s) of ttI � ThM ordMiilioe I . on - -Decernt>er 13 11" In 6".1 aelte . A 47 from i-t�UIQr1dlr .o _ flee with Oil Dril{In kia of new all wabs. N6 FULL'T gfT oR 01111010IANC E lei AVAICAN.9 IN YHE 0frY CLgW'S o0u "Anoprsd by oft s,f r t otrn41I or the G"y of"rt. MgtQn 6"ah at an rep Aw 19 8 WwWft. held Mc , csrrobrr 4.'IQ44, ty too,. MN am eon: i . AAY 8: Caunall Wanam: ` M �A1et 11eWIF , a ar aQrM"s; I declare, under penalty of Perjury, that the .90".trti W.4 foregoing is true and correct. NAMES; Ca nilltr+p•nb s: Atii,?ENT: t mx4ll cram. �flft:Nano LfTr ON KU1Ti4QTQRf ' Executed can LX2cfrntx:r 13 198 R WACK Csorir.a�lw+t r, 0114CA r at Costa ?vie, C +a Omgl C�i Mesa, allfornia. Do Pilot O"nber M, 1391 Cbnaturc PI'100 OF PUBLICATION 1 y ww l - • P;.ye 13 - Council /Agency Minutes - 11 /21188 rQ tt41 St �.� ; The City Council is required to certify as adequate Supp]ement-al Environmental Impact Report No . 88-1 and recertify Environmental Impact Report No. 86-1 with a Statement of Overriding Considerations prior to any action on lone Change No. 88-11 and Use Permit No . 88--%. . The City Clerk announced that all legal requirements for notification , puhli - cation and posting had been met , and that she had received six communications regarJing the matter. Against the project were the following: Pamela A. ` Steele , Concerned Citizens for hun.tington Beach , dated November A , 1988 ; Mary I Parrish , Treasurer, Concerned Citizens for N . 3 . , dated September 14 , 1988; I Daryl Phillips , dated September 26 , 1988; acid Anita Young , dated November 18, 19P8 . In support of -tie project were Milton !i . MaroN, dated October 29 , 1988 and Angus Petroleum Corporation, dated November 17 , 1988 . ,fhe City Clerk announced that Luci Ile Barmen was present to speak �!uri nq the public hearing but had to i eave; she left word that she was in support of the proiect and represented six other property owners . 'rhe City Administrator presented a staff report. Fire Chief Picard , presentee! a staff report from the fire protection and safety standpoint . Scott Hess , Senior Planner , presented a staff report referring to photos and drawings . Kelly Main, Associate Planner, presented a staff report. She stated that the California, Environmental Quality Act requires that to approve the project n Environmental Impact Report has been done and significant impacts Nhere a acts p p g p have been assessed that the Cite has to make one or more written findings for each of those significant effects . Ms . chin requested that the following information be made a part of the record: Corrections of the Qrkft SwWl ementa.l. Envi ronmental Impl&t deport Ng. 88 1 _ EDmi r rmeftIA-1 Gt t Na. . 866-1 for the PrQ sad Spr�ef�� gi 1 RecgY@r.Y Pict, (In .Cg ungt-�gn with Zo. Change,, 88-11 and Usg PeMJI No. 88 J5) to be Included within Attachment 4: "Page delete Section 4. Add the following paragraph to page 8, Section 1 .3: "(e) The Project will eliminate 22 existing wells and 7 tank batteries. None of the batteries has more than rudimentary fire-fighting equipment, and the yells all have some leaks around the stuffing box-)s . Both the existing wells and tank batteries are located in close proximity to residences; unlike the Proieet, they are not completely surrounded by block walls , with wells located underground in trench cellars. The Project ' s design will ensure that oil leaks resulting from a ma4or earthquake would not escape beyond the con- fines of the Project, while existing wells and tank batteries create numerous risks of leakage and other potential hazards in the event of a major earth- quake. In addition, all existing wells are connected to their tank batteries by means of buried pipelines . ,any of thesa lines are old, and their exact locations are not known. Approximately 18,000 feet of pipeline will be abon- tloned by the Project, which will replace the pipeline with pi pel i ryes that are 'n condutts under the corner of Springfield Avenue and Huntington Street or hun on the collar wa 1 l r , where leaks can be found aiod regal red quickly. This will result in a significant reduction in the impacts of ruptures and leaks in the event of a Wor earthquake. " Add the following underlined phrase to Page 21 , Section 2 .7 Traffic and Circulation (a) Entrances to the site shall occur Page 14 W Counri1 /Agency Minutes - 11121la8 i only "�r1glalrg . xrt, " Springfield Avenue and California Street.. Page 22 , Sertion 2. 7 .2 , paragraph ( 0 shall be revised to read , "During the pre-dry ll-- i ng construr:tion phase , truce: rMtes as approved by the Department of Public Works and shown in the Circulation Element of the General Plan shall be used. " On Page 30, Section 2. 10. 3 add "(a) 'the Project will result i.,. the abandonment of approximately 18 ,000 fey,, of 9xisting pipeline . Many of these 1 ibes are old , and tnei r exact locations cations are unknown. The abandonment of this pipeline will result in a significant reduction in the potential for pipeline leaks . " Ms . Main stated that a ropy of the additional findings relating to Project Consistency with the Housing Element added to Section 2 .5. 2 . of the CEQA Findings was submitted to Council prior to the meeting . i The Mayor declared the hearing open. UoCgr She'IdQCi. Ighn F1ynr, RQggr .�i L, _'.1�C.?r1.1_6_, 42r� " swo ld, Ighn Ck , -Mickey 5hafl-r, 1y , Ma-r-th-a--amsk, Clack G01ftAk, repre- senting Huntington Beach Chamber of Commerce, presented a copy of a letter and position to the City Clerk, Tarr Van Tuyl , Marcik . ard , joh,i An. Auten, Jun � Nj] sous , Susan .Saunts , d.�5 " l �', Pam. LE, Qfinni-I-Al l e.n, Leon Wes, Ted Martel , ill nick, - eg.rge_ Grattan , Kgyin di l lijms , EAtricia Knt, and jgho Carmichael spoke in support of this project . Wnn8_JSlai..e, C ph PJOJ1&, �&Mg]L Ste-e-le , jghn_.Ht1rdolk, John Wastarmajer (He stated he submitted a letter. ) , Denjse de VinRs , E&�,Q�.1e�, Ar�.d Alvarez, 19„ha�el Craig, Mark Porter, &jUy Abramm clg".tL Corry, duk flartrgn, ponal d phippst f4.. .j1, John Mgseiran, NanCy Koggl gr, Judd irtmag. Mr� Pairlsb, Lynn MoS eman, i shard 6bramsgo spoke in opposition to this; project. There being no one present to speak further on the matter and there being no further protests filed, either oral or writteli, the hearing was closed by the Mayor, Mayor Frskine informed Council that he had communication with Concerned Citizens of Auntington Beach and had discussed the project with Mr. Sheldon . The City Clerk presented Resolution No. 5954 for Council Consideration - "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ACTING SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 00. 88-1 (SEIR 88-1 ) AND ENVIRONMrENTAL IMPACT RSPORT NO. 86-1 (EIR 86-1) FOR THE SPRINGFIELD OIL RECOVERY PRWIECT LXATED ON TWO BLOCKS ON OPPOSITE CORNERS, SOUTHEAST AND NORTRWST, AT THE INTERSECTIOO OF SPRIKIGFIEL13 AVENUE AND CALIFORNIA STREET AND INCLUDING 160 ACRES OF SCATTERED WELL OPERATIONS, SOUilDED GENERALLY BY FLORIDA STREET ON THE EAST AND SEVENTEENTH STREET ON THC WEST, BETWEEN YORKTOWM AVENUE 111 TK NORTH MO NEMiPHIS AVENUE ON THE SOUTH." A nation was made by Mays , seconded by Kelly, to adopt and certify as adequate Supplemental EIR #88-1 and adopt and recertify as adequate EIR #86+1 with Stateant . of Overriding Considerations by adopting Resolution No. 6954. The nation carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Kelly, Green, Erskine, Mays, Bannister NOES: Finley, Winchell ABSENT: None PL f Page 15 - Council /Agency M, nutes - 1 1 I21188 Tho City Clerk presented Ordinance No. e-980 fc,r Council consideration - "AN ORDINOCE OF THE CITY Of HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE iiUNTINGTCM BEACH ORDINANCE OWE BY AMENDING SECTION 9061 TO PKWIDE FOR CHANGE OF Z(WING FROM OLDT(ft SPECIFIC PLAN (DISTRICT TWO) WITH UI L SUFFIX TO OLDTGWN SPECIFIC PLAN (DISTEICT TWO) WIT11 OIL SUFFIX FOR DRILLING PURPOSES ON REAL PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED BEI-WEEN DELAWARE STREET TO THE EAST, ROCHESTER AVENUE TO THE S(7fJTP.. CALIFORNIA STREET TO THE WEST, AND SPRINGFIELD AVENUE TO THE NORTH, (ZONE. CHANGE NO. .A motion was made by M;ys , seconded by Kplly, to approve Zone Change 88-11 with findings as set forth on Attachment #1 of the RCA dated November 21 , 1988 and after reading oy title , to approve the introduction of Ordinance No. 75180. FiAdip9.E_ .C.g -a l ZQne Chaau—Na., U-11: I . A change of zone from "Oldtowh Specific Pian , District Two-01' (Oil Operations excluding Oil Drilling) to "Oldtown Specific Plan, district Two-01 '' (Oil Operations including Oil Drilling) will be compatible with surrounding residential uses based on the mitigation measures described in the environmental impact report and conditions of approval outlined in the use permit . 2. The proposed zone change is consistent with the goals aiid policies of the General Plan. Unitization and consolidation of existing oil operations is encouraged because At reduces the land area used for oil facilities. Approximately 5. 3 acres of developable land will become available after the consolidation on the two blocks (3 . 1 acres) . a. Section 9682 of Article M of the City' s zoning Code provides for the establishment of "01 " Districts . The only limitation for such an 01 District is that of a minimum surface area (100 feet by 150 feet) , as required by Section 9682 . 1 . The proposed drill site for the project is considerab'y larger than tha minimum dimensions required by Section 96A2. 1 . Therefore , it is consistent with this provision. I . Section 9682 ,2 requires dedication, or an irrevocable offer of dedi- cation, of all real property that the City may reg0 re for its streets and other public service facilities or improvements . All City-required dedications will , be i mpl ementud thr�ligh the terms of recorded tract maps for the project site . Therefore, ' :hp project is consistent with this provision . C. The project will remove oil producing facilities from si.� sites , thereby permitting the restoration of oil sites scattered over 160 acres. Although oil producing facilities will remain on the project site, the appearance of the project site will be improved o.er its present condition . Therefore, the project is consistent with this policy. d. With respect to the Land Use Element, policies have bees trans ia►tsd Into a Zoning and Land Use Element Consistency Matrix . The matrix shorts that as a miscellaneous district -0) may be combined (i .e. is consistent) with any land use category. It Is specifically cony. t s- tent with low, medium and medium-high density residential categories. r Page 16 -- Council /Agency Minutes - 11 /21 /88 e. A General Plan Amendment is not required because the :ombined acreage of the proposed site is less than 20 acres as set forth in the Size Criteria for Determining Land Use Designations taoi contained in the General Plan . 3. Corrpl i ante with Title 8 and Title 15 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code and the use permit conditions of approval will ensure that the proposed use allowed by the zone change will not be detrimental to the general hPaith , welfare , and safety of flj�2 community. The motion carried by the following roll call vote : AYES : Kelly, Green , Erskine , Mays , Bannister NOES: Finley, Winchell ABSENT: None A motion was made by Mays , seconded by Kelly , to sustain the Planning Commission decision, to deny the appeal and to approve Use permit 88-25 based on findings and conditions of approval and mitigation measures outlined in Attachment #1 to the RCA dated November 21 , 1938 with Modified Conditions 8h, 19 $ 37 . 1 . The estahlisWwnt, maintenance and operation of the oil operation will not be dtrimental to the general welfare: of persons residing or working ' n the vicinity, property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or, building based on the Conditions of approval and compliance with Title 81 and Title 15 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code. 2 . The proposed oil operation is consistent with the goals and obje-ctj 66 of the General Plain , Oil activities are a consistent use in any land use category of the General plan . 3. The pro3ect will consolidate evil operations in one location rpdrjsing the visual impact of numerous wells now spread throughout the Springfield Oil Field area . Such consolidation will also be advantageous for safety and no` se reduction purposes. The project will result in the abar:donment and reclamation of 31 existing wells and 16 oil storage tanks in the Spring- field Oil Field area and will not significantly increase traffic in that aroa . 4. Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 88-•1 and Environmental Impact Report No. 86-1 have determined that any remaining significant effects on U16 envi rorrment found to be unavoidable are acceptable due to w7rriding considerations . 5. Conditions o? approval for Use permit No. 68-18 have eliminated or 3ub-- stantialry lessened ail significant effects on the environment where feasible. 5. The project will result in increased tax revenues for the City of Huntington Beach and other governmental agencies . f N ge 17 - Council /Agency Minutes - 11 /21 /88 7 . The conditions of approval are desirable and necessary in order to effec- tuate the purposes of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code , the official General Plan Land Use plan and the best interestE of the City. Further, they include mitigation measures set forth in the final Environmental Impact Report that will assure the location Is suitable for the type of use proposed and the following will not result or be reasonably anticipated from the project: a. Damage or Oui lance from not sE, smoke , odor , dust or vi t" atic.;; hazards from explosion , contamination or fire. b. Hazards occasioned by unusual volumes or character of traffic; incompatibility with surrounding development. C . The project complies with all requirements of Division 9 except for the identified reduction of exterior sideyord setback and other applicd ble provisions of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code. r S. The conditions imposes include requirements of plans for the disposition 4; of oil wells and for oil operations on the property involved, and for berms, walls and landscaping to provide maximum feasible screening of equipment and facili 'J es . 9. Change; have been required and incorporated in the project to mitigate or avoid the significant adverse environmental effects of the project: a. The Division of Oil and Gas enforces rules and regulations for the conduct of rr.-ondary recovery operations . b. The mitigation measures incorporated, proposed and adopted , together with application of the rules and regulations .if the G!vision of Cif and Gas , will substantially mitigate all of the adverse imracts identified . c . Public agencies other than the City, including the division of Oil j and Gas , Regional Water Quality Control Board and South Coast Air Quality Management District , will be reviewing aspects of this proisct for mitigation measures as to matters within their responsi.. billty and jurisdiction, including subsurface oaeration , water and air quality; the critical need For oil renders infeasible the alter- natives of no project or delayed project implementation, and ,alternative surface loratione are infeasible because of their limited availability, or the greater disruption to the community at large which would result therefrom. 10. The subject location is centrally located within the Springfield Oil field area; relocating the proposed project to another site is infeasible. 11 . No substantial public purpose would be served by denial of Use Permit No. 88-25 but rather: a. at 1s i ortant that the United States develop its existing oil reserves in order to meet its energy needs without increasing depen- dence on - foreign oil , and this project will result in incremental recovery of approximately nine (9) million barrels of oil ; and ..Ly. h Page 18 - Council /Agency Minutes - 11 /21 /88 b . The project will Consolidate oil operations in one lceation, reduc- ing the %-isusl impact of numerous wells now spread throughout the Oldtown portion of the City; and c . Such Consolidation will also be advantageous for safety and noise reduction purposed : and d . The pro"ect wi l l be only an into-41m use of the surface site involved , and at thc: termination of the project the site will to available 'Dr recycling into other uses ; and e. fhe project will benefit and accrue to the general welfare of the City and the public for each of the reasons set forth above. f. Approval of this project will reduce the immediate demand for more off-shore drilling facilities . 12 . The proposed oil consolidation protect will have 24 hour on- site per- sonnel , and will he safer than the existing non-continuous monitoring of the 31 si:attered wells to he abandoned throughout the area . This will reduce the possible attract-Ion of younger persons . 13. The most modern , efficient energy-saving equipment available will be integrated into the design of the project which will mitigate environ- mental impacts such as fire, noise and air pollutants. 14 . The applicant has submitted a property value protection plan which will be imp' -emented as outlined prior to drilling. 15, the reduction . of the exterior sideyard setbacks from ten ( 10) to seven �7) feet is based on the following: a . The reduction of exterior sideyard setback for perimeter wall. from ten (10) to seven (7) feet will result in improved design and utility of the project . b. The design of the perimeter wall wi11 be compatible with the P surrounding neighborhood. C. The proposed perimeter wall with reduced exterior sideyard setbacks will not have a detrimental effect on the genera, health , safety, welfare or setback privacy of surrounding residents . d. Variation in the wail setback is provided through the use of offset landscape pockets , architectural features and building materials . Qmditions of.ADRroval -fig Pfirmit. hg. 86-25: i 1 . The site plan, elevations and landscape plan dated recei! ed October !3, 19880 shall be the conceptually approved layout. a. This use permit shall not become Effective until zone Change No. 88-11 has been approved and in effect. 2. All structures and procedures shall conform to Title 15 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Cade and the Division of Oil and Gas Standards. X Page 19 -• Coutir i 1/Agency M1 nutes - 11 /21 /88 3 . The aoplicant shali obtain all necessary electrical and building permits . 4 . Noise n,oni tort ng shAl l be conducted under the sup-irvi s i on an arpus-- tical engineer certified by the County of Orange. ,tiaports :1 '1 be sub- mitted to the Director of C.ommuni ty Development within thre.: vorki ng days after the completion of each phase of the monitoring effect . The monitoring shall include the following: a. ere-•dri I Prior to the start of the drilling phase, noise measurements shall be obtaineu during the operation of the specific drilling rig which has been selected ani the measure- ments shall be related to those which will be experienced at the nearest residential boundaries to the drilling site . In addition, the noise control measures have been (or will be) applied to the rig as needed for compliance with the City of Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance ;hall be identified . b. Start_ of Drilling. Noise measurements shall be obtained during the nighttime hours (10:00 PM to 7 :00 AM) for at least six hours on each or three nights within the five aay period from the start of the dri 1 l.i ng phase. Monitoring is to occur at the nearest residential boundary to the actual drilling operation . I The noise level data shall be compared to those specified in the City of Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance by the department of Community Development. Where an exceedance of the ordinance is identified, noise control measures shall be applied and an i additional two nights of monitoring shall be required. C. Ing the rj 11 inng, EhILS2 . Noise monitoring shall occur during a six-hour period between the hours from 10:00 PM to 7:00 AM at least onto each month during the drilling phase of the project. The noise level data obtained shall be compared to the City of Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance standards by the department of Community Development . Where an exceadanc a of the standards is identified, noise control measures shall be applied and an additional two nights of r ni tors ng shall be required. S. Measures to reduce erosion should be used durin grading an,i site prepar- ation. Grading and construction activity shal? take place only during daylight hours after the issuance of a grading permit by the Department of Pudic .fork s . 6. Durin4 rading and excavation , earthmoving crews should observe cuts and spoils for potential archaeological finds . In the event of a potential find being located, operations shall be suspended until the significance of the find is determined. 7. k dust control program shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development for reviaw and approval prior to the issuance of building peretl is. B. All street improvements for both tracts shall bs constructed ,after the hfary aradino operations have boon cooploted (apprcmimrtely 4 weeks): womb Page 20 - Council /Agency Minutes - i1121 /88 a . Final grading , or any other on-site construction shall be prohibited until street improvement construction has commenced . u . PlIor to any on-site construction or dri f ling , the masonry wa11 and all landscaping and strr:et improvements shall be installed subject to the approval of Department of 'Community aevalopment and Department of Public Works . However, construction, of value boxes may begin after street improvement constr:fiction was commenced. 9. Prior to the installation of any landscaping, a landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development and Public Works for review and approval . it . All landscaping shall cnmply with Chapter 15. 22 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code and all trees shall be mininium 24 inch box type and spaced no greater than 20 feet on centor . lD. P,,rior to tha installation of the office structure, elevations shall be provided for review and approval by the Department of Community ' Development. a. The office shall be on a permanent foundation . b. A mansard or pitched roof shall be provided. 11 . The applicant shall enter into a franchise agreeiuent with the City for i the instViation of the underground connection between the two blocks , if required. 12. The iiroper sealing and abandonment of the existing scattered wells which will be replaces+ by this project shall take place following approval of this project and must be completed within eighteen (18) months . 13. The surface of the site shall be com letely covered with an appropriate material (such as gravel and/or aspha t) subject to review and approval of Public Works Department , Fire Department and Department of Co,nmunity Development, 14, A renort prepareA , by at, acoustical engineer certified by the County of Orange shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development for revisit and approval prior to commencing drilling. Said report shall duscri be noi;;e 1 - .#el s at the Angus Oil Site property line and at the nearest residential ' line both with, and without an acoustical blanket on the dri 111 ng rig and service rigs . Th-. report shall indicate noisr., attenuation measures necessary to ensure compliance with the Munt'ington Beach Noise Code. This shall include the provisions of the Ordll -,,�nce Cade regarding maximum hourly average noise level at nearest resioential property line of 50 MA) during nighttime hours between iD WIN and 7:00 AN. a. A double acoustical blanket enclosure shall be provided at man-door entrances. 1+5. Noise attenuation for the drilling ops;,'ation, oil operation and service operation shall be provided pursuant to the Oil Code and noise report specified ire Condition 14. 4 wrM• " i a Pogo 21 - Cuunci i lAgeoCy Hlr;ukes - 1112 1 /$3 z . It a noise violation occurs , the entir drill1ra structure shall be wrapped with i,i acoustical blanket for greater noise attenuation. 16 . 4o speakers , loud beds or buzzers s,hal l he employed or, site . 17 . Excessive vibration , as dererenined by fhp Department of Coranur2lty Development , shall be reduced to acceptable levels . 18. Light and glare shall be directed and/or screened to prevent "splll � c" orito adjacent residential properties and shall be energy efficient ,ub- ject to the requirements of the Pililding Division . 19. During the pre drilling construction phase , all heavy truck traffic shall be limited to the use of designated truck routes as approved by the Department of Pubi is Works and i o accord with the Circulation. Clemert of the Genera" Plan. All heavy truck traffic during the drilling and the operational phase of the project shall be limited to the following streets between the 405 freeway and the subject si -ce: Beach Boulevard, Adams Avenue , and Delaware Street. For entrance to the site only Spring- field Avenue and California Street may be used . 20, Heavy truck traffic shall be limited to the hours between 7:00 AM and S :00 PM. j a . No trucks may park on the street. b. Truck deliveries shall be staggered so that no stacking shall occur on public streets , 21 . All employees must park on either one of the two sit-es . Street parking for employees is prohibited. 22. lcral streets affected by truck traffic shall be inspected before and after construction . Any damage to local streets by heavy trucks shall be repaired and reconstructed per City requirements at the expense of the appl,cant• 23. All driveways shall be rrdius type and c:;nstructed to Public horks standards. 24. There shall be no entrancF or exit of vehicles from tho drilling site between the hours of 10:00 PM and 7:00 AN except for emergency purposes , xS• An overload permit shou'rd be obtained from City and State (if required) for all overs i iced loads to be moved on . Ohl i c streets . 26. pipe . stri ng cement!ng through fresh water• bearing sands shall be imple- mented to prevent salt water intrusion into the aquifers . 27. A system for collecting, treating, and releasing storm drainage shall be provided by the applicant and approved by Public Works. 20, Brine water shall not 'ue released Into the sewer system. r i Page 22 - Co;:ttc l l /Ag+incy Minutes - 11121 /88 29 . A recycling plan of produced zone water back to the oil reso rvoi r shall be certi f i Qd by the Dppartmen t of! Oil and Gas and the Fire De;)artment and al 'i its ror,ciition. and restrictions sha, l bp adhered to. 30. Well servica: rigs shall be operat'_d no- inof f.icin a total of 48 days per year between 7 :00 AM and 7 : 00 PM or day] i g,it f ato- s , wit i chc�ver Is shorter . 31 . No more than tour well service rigs may be on the premise; at any one time. The service rigs small rot exceed 120 feet in height and shall be double muffled and utilize acoustical blankets as deemed necessary . 32. All drilling rigs and production wells shall be operated by eleCt deal motors and electric pumps only. 33. Th! 24-hour phase drilling rigs shall not operate for any longer than 7 years from the Issuance of the first drilling permit . 34. Corilling rigs for remaining wells after the two year period stall cumply with the conditions , Subsequent dri l 1 i r.g shall be limited to :00 AM to 10:O0 PM only. 35. Urilling derricks shall not exceed 165 feet in overa'► l height, 36.. Upon completion of 24 hours phase of injection and producer wells , all drilling rigs shall be removed from the site. 37' . Upon completion of al l dri i ling operations , the dri ) ling structure shall be removed from the site. 38. Applicant shall install blowout prevention equipment. 39. A full vapor recovery system shall he installed as required by the South Coast Air Quality Management district. 40. Only three an-site crude oil tanks are permitted and shall never be completely full at once. J 41 . Prepare and submit a Preliminary Emergercy Action Plan LEAP) prior to � issuance of building permits . A completed Emergency Action Plan based on as-built plans shall be completed and submitted prior to the star!: of oil production operations . The Emergency Action Plan shall include employee training and periodic practfce, how spillage onto street from, H te(s) j would be handled (stockpile of sand, etc . ) , the safe handling of any chemicals and/or materials , and full knowledge of all systems and emer- gency, 9quipment. A copy stall be on file with the Fire Department and � updated on .a five year basis . In addition, a Spill Prevention and � Control and Countermeasure MCC) Plan in compliance with City require- ments for handling of spills , etc. , not otherwise covered in the Emer- gency Action P:an shall be completed and riled with the City prior to the start of oil production operations. 42. All oil must be transported by pipeline. 43. An ors-site fire suppression system shall be i:,stdlled as a primary source tf for +i r¢ protection pursuant to Fire Department requi rementu. t y6 ,R . r Page 13 - Counc l 1 /Agency Minutes - 11 121 !�1; 44 roller requirements for oil v.,e11 a , A hycirc;lt�n stilfir:e d� tecti on syctem forthe well col lers she it be E ios'tal led dijbjeLt to F ire appartment vegkii- empnts . b . Fire extin,luishers approved by thy: Fire ()Ppa;-t'meni must be 1nst �1 ; led within 75 feet of travel a«->ite . G . Provide metal open gr alo L:ovprs over tap of well cNllr!i 45 . Storage tank requirorients: a . Must have pre--plurnb?d foam injection systom Installed on All proauct storage tanks . b � Must have exterior- adeluge !iater spray system on a1 1 storage t n. k 46 . Site requir,�rr,ents : a . All diked areas must have an engineered drainage system. b. Foan, storage area and foam quantity to be approved by Fire Department . c . Fire ; ydrants to be I ocated I n areas approved by F1 re Department. d . Hydrogen aul fi de detiac ti on system approved by Fire Department to be � installed on pro4ect perineeter. e. Fire extinguishers approved by the Fire Department must, be 1 ns ta►l ied throughout the site. f, All gate openings mrjs t be 24 feel: in width and installation must comply with Fire Department SpeciFiCa,tion 403. 47. Ne11 Gel lakrs shall be Fa Intai ned in a clean and efficient manner to prevent waste accumulation . 43. Twin (21 ) abandoned wells have been identified within the project area which do not meet pr-esent day 0andonrrent requirements. A contin- ge:�cy plan shall be outlfned and submitted to thr Hui.tington Beach Fire Department for review and appr-nval vith steps to be taken in the event .that leakage from any c7 those abandrned wells finds its way to the surface. 49. prior to termination of the oil operation , a plan shall be siO ni tted subjut to review and approval of the Fire Departmehi` and toewnunity Development Department,, s how irrg how the site shall be abandoned and � restored to its closest matiaral state. 50. There shall be no pipel i to construction activity outside, the si to except between the hours of 7:W A14 and 8:00 M,, ifionday W-ough Saturday only . 51 . The mthodology of oil zeCIDV*ry for th► s prO,lect ShAll bR 111n11ted' tq meter injection 1coly. St aem i rejection shell be prohibited. ��w�..n..��-,•...�-...r-teaw�.'.�,.-.--.. _.____ ' !' �rlt! Cot nc i I /Agency Mi 1 1 /2 1 /h$ �i ,ne operator Staall Z{t all times duringg thf i,c.—i i of this use pl:rr>>ir an arty renewal or extension the)-eof, maintainr in forgo 41I nsur once pol icY or policies in3u ing the operator , and as additiona'i itiStj I viL t:h C:iLy uf' Huntin►ion heart the Lity Ctrunci1 and oacl, member thP.reof , tnd every officer and employee of tho City acting io the due course of his elmplo !" ment or in his official cr1, city, against ) lability or financial i05S resulting from any siuits , Iaini� or actions brotiallt by an; Person of- i person!; a n o from a casts a,,d c.xpen� e ., of I i tiyatiun brought against thF insureds , in rh< amount of ,not lrs : than `5,000, 000 combined sing'. l tmti t for ariy injury to persons o+ oa,nace tr) prop;rt;: , including (hut: nat 1 i mi t-rd ro) i n.iu y or danagr± frorl� subsidence and rebound, resulting f i:,n the operator' s !)i 1 dri 1 1 ing and production act-1v: t-1 -;s and operation•, Incidental thereto. Said policies: shall provide that the insur<:nrn coverage shall not be cancel Ied or reduced by the insura!icc carrier wi thout the Ci N havino bee,i gi ,,en at least ten days prior written notice thereof by such r:arrier . The operator shall not cancel or reduce said i r ! v ipe . all iinvs durin�. :he i.erm of this Ilse orrrlit and nsur a�i .�, c�� Era,,. . ,`i 1 . t , . � p , ariy. renewals or extension thr!reof, the ,.perator ,hall maintain on file with fihe city Clerk a cer`i ficate or certificates of insurance 'issued ter the carrier or carriers showing that: said insurance is in effect it-, the amount required above , and a copy of e:.).r,h insurance pollc) . If the operator does not keep said 1nsur•anco in fui1 force and effect , the City may obtain said insuran-P and pay the preinitrm ther�:on, which shall then be deemad a debt owned by the operator to the City. Any insurance poli- cles procured by the opRrator hereunder shall provide that the insurance carrl er waives all rights of subrogation against the City. If the Ci ty obtains any po', icy of insurance hereunder, such policy shall include a waiver by the insurance carrier of all rights of subrogation againsi tile, it operator. 53 . The Pl anal ncl Commission shall review and , if necessary, may m,%.di fy thn condi tiers AS set forth its this usA permit , at thc: firs regular Pl znninv Commission mett•i ng in Octo',er, 1989, and at five year intervals there- after , and upon any change in ownership of the project which ocr,;rS be•twe6n five-year, reviews ; provided that the phrase "change a,, ownr:rshi p" +j ds used herein shall not include any sale or other transfer to a ccrpor- � atlen , partnership or other form of business organization in which Alberta Natural Gas-United States and/or onti or more of its shareholders or subsidiaries owns the controlling interests , or any sale or transfer so long as Angers or one of its subsidiaries retains responsibility for the operation of the prcject . 54. The Planning Coiwni scion reserves the right to rebuke this use permit 1 f say Yllolatiun of :,hesP conditions or the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs. The City shall provide the property owner with notice in writing of any `iooc.tiorl stating the Lity's basis for determining that a v� ola- tion has occurred. The property owner shiRll have it reasonable tole to cure the violation before furt:,ar action ; s taken. Tye City may require the property owner wi tt notice in writing to submit written de3cumentation of ottionr' takeo to reneev any violation and may ►•quire monitoring or , other procedures to he implemented in order to ensure that the violation will re cured. 55. Th: nine member~ pwoject review committee_ shal mW for the prouect during the drilling phiiii..e arid semi-annually thwreafter. rN Fire Department and Comunity Development depa:t%-:ts shall Jointly provide a staff 11eison. 'I II ihe lui, prot,,.,ctiori. Fil -in --Mbmit'Nd by '11he Applicant shall be impl -!ml.-�vtvd a.,, on ,' _ilned prior to dris' ling . TI) tht, I)V,-.,;.,t 0)sil- rithL41- (),,w oi' this two ;`) )ork. is he without 24-hour to provide con t I n-• wh i L pwl ,,ollilol M: the ototheri te . A I I w I itli i o; iiw u i c,,, i P S Ef I anti F.1 R 66-1 hal I ho fi t?(. !'ctl �. ; .!`!ill i ( , !,%II'; c" r P o. ; - io Thal I be applro,/Hd by h thri-Imili t1i C:i ty : t oi It" (jurit'!, t.),il. h o I I (I.-I I ling phis(? , OF. nljnlh:.�r or nature of complaints I" C I I tc 1)r v,,(1 -0 d t� il II f n-I-c f iivn L :I ff' fi-oir, handling t h 9 i r normal t-y A k'rii 4. n 4, s lcr o)- ni-iy asp (In, t) ty eff il)I oye e to a c t x s j f!C LIZ) I'_1 sit i(I Ombudsman sha I I i na I) t i, Pro .1 L C 0 0 G j v c i nspoc Lio,is , assure Use Permit rovipl fiance , ?k.s, is' i ri prob I &m re:;t-A tj t i on and L i t i zen communication; . LI'00t) -)i-F J' C?Pta t i On of an appropriatv invoice , the applicant shall ,-- hriburse the City for the time spf!nt by the Omho(Jnwan on sir.-h a.. 'Livitle!, . och cost shrill be calculated at thf� dirccIC hourly c3 t of such ei-iiploycv his or her :;cheduled salary r it i,-�- r ega rd 4.1-o i rid i r% -.,t or ret i reman t benp f i is - The &.arges for with Orhildstlian services shall not include any charyc,,; for other City lnspect-.�f.., or Code onforci.-meat ewploye(?-) whose services ztrf,� intended to be covt�red 1).*/ payrrent- of various perm.it fe s . The rr000n Larried by the fc)( lov.,ing roll call vote: tiYES Ke 11 ,,, careen, Ersk i no , days', , Bann i r te r .40ES F 10 ey, Wi pchel 1 ABSENT: N,-)nk, -A Liu The Mayor announced this was the day and hour set fcr a public to consider the following: 5j&jtLj- Apppdl of Planning Crmmission ' s Approval of Cooditiun4l Use Permit Na. 88-40 1 AMI.1,giLt Henro Spa,,h , Ltd . - 4201 Long Beach Blvd. #403 , 'Long Beach , CA 90807 &UC_jAU: Jack Crimes, President, and Jeff Siegfried , Vice-President, on behal-f of Seawind Cove Homeowners Association k"ASIO: 19092 Beach Boulevard, Suites J, K$ L, and N of Playe. de Id Plaza Center (east side of Beach Boulevard approximately 247 feet south of Carfield Avenue) . ErgROIAI: Appeal of Planning Commission ' s approval of a request to permit the operation of a 4,950 square foot family billiard (14 pool tables) and game arcade center, which includes a food snack bar . Page 126 -• Count:' l /Agency di nutes - i 1 /21 !38 Vj C&tv(or•ical l,y exempt nursua-it to S iction 15301 , Class 1 , of the California Environmenf4l Quality Act. lhct i i ty Clerk annourrred that she had reviewed a communication from Debby Huffman, represent"irig several liuntirrgLon crest residents opposing the projcct and requeatiny a continuance of the puhi1c hearing and a communication from Jerry Same , at:torney , repri!sent ing applicant stating hi s opposition to a continur�nc:e of this ;Whlic hr�adncl . Scnt'; Hc.,s , Senior f'l ;.nner , prv,"p0tud staff report . The N�tyor oec1ared the hv.3rin j Y.._�► Lne , attor-nF;i :pres nHmil the •ipplic;u-f- , s pfrosition of a continuance of thi ., Wui,l is hearinn. J_ef f . J@0"1'i vi , 'I)11d. _i._QIdQy, Va. Ya! 1-11e, a..cK . mes., DQ0i e (t1,1* 11 �;riC" ,f: i :' oppo; it1on t0 till ; pr'oj ct'. . IQ!Jy _01,l ' nr i.m-)pe ` c1fi.: .__l? ,Yl 4L�. r,�,,a1_, and f�.L .�it_�wZ.+=c! spol%e in support of this project , iho a being 110 rune present- to sp-2at: f.rrther can the matter and there bring no fur-.her protesL� filed , .flt:I,er orii1 or written , the hearing was closed by the Mayo r. Followingdiscussion , a motion >rtcs rude b� h'.a s se%onded b Green to ova-- � ,, y y , rule thu Pl anni r "ommi s si on ' s approval of Cony i iona i Use Pet mi t BB-40. The ox)tion fal ►ed b� following roll cal1 tiFl voAe : AYES . Green , Mays , Hinchell NOES: Ko I 1 `r , Finley, Erskine A85ENT : 8anni r ter (,tut of the room) The CI ty Attorney Stat?d r'.h : IN in Comarri ssioil decision to appro"e C..ondi; tione i Use Perini t 9.9-40 preva1 1 ��d . iQl+.v__r�.11 s:i ��Ff4. -0-IJ( —LIEAR AG QKIidML TO 12/5at. -___.%TUE M_02 EK The Mayor announced th it this was the day and hour set for a public hearing to consider Code Amendment: No . 88•-3A, accepting the modified language as appro•, ed by the CM ifornia Coastal Commission , by adopting Resolution Na. 5958 and Orlln4nco No. 2981 , The City Clergy: announcer) that all legal requirements for notification, publi- catio, and posting had bcen met, and that she had received no communications or written protests to the matter. The Hayor declareo the hearing open. On motion by Kelly, second Erski np, Council voted unani sous ly to Continue the open public hearing to %cember 5, 1988 to consider Code Amendment No. 08-3A, Resolution No. 5958 and Ordinance No. 2901 pertaining to modification of language as approved by the California Coastal Commission. Concerned Citizens for Huntington j : * LABELS CCIMPLETED 3each 299 LASS.-S PRINTED 1919 Ai suna Lane --- - - Huntington Reach, 92648 = la e r �: Fi EVANGEL!! AL FREE t CL I Fr E - - 1�= 1 i ; I ;i .Mr-, :i_ ��- �.9I2 FLORIDA r'T - L91 ;�LLC i/.hCr._.L�i -F: `_ „{�. 1 . -;--r� -' _ t�kJ�ITIIV6T�I BCC . �.H =��n�c 1_ (.N it /V�• C rC H, SEyQA,NT/�L.•�FE.�R MINA M �_n�_fyi�i _��1F�i�i%� � ��.,_�;�='r, �=.z%E;,�+ �--A FREE � 908 PECAN AVE 't: -iF + s• r I {j��I�JJ�� t Ir- tJ -_]j � — i T+1T I i i 1 L��', t. . I ETC N � , A `-' 40 ii . N ! lN'TI. e- 1 r. `1^.u'' '1•-,I �-`• _` '' l �- 02620041 Ti i 1912 FLORIDA ST Lsc-..tom ----HUNT IN6T BCC►_ CA :92_��i EDI t EY s_,A r 0061 1793177 BEACH ELVD _t Y j TE LA �'I_�_ -II'�ti C}rs -� ' � - �—r r�_' - 1 W)NTlN(310N BCC . '_H ��_'1=:�f RiFaP:'.Uyl_� t = ��='�_ �C`.`t'?,yi i =—,� '�- � tL. 025200651 FLORIDA /1 1 MEN I Y 1 /. � /r.l _ _ _ R 20 L. I 1'i . . ':{Z _ i�� BIBLE ! r'.•_t_f-. I _1 i ,.., ^ �IR,�. 1S1 �Z"_, NEW E?RI T T:=i1N LN HUNT INGTON BC H- CA '32-646 H',)HT i N G t i Brt i c_;" I� � i7�y�l•..-.�ji�Gl --.lT1 L_TE l t�� '.I4 T1:'•�li _ -1 _!_L�_I 1_i-=E ': 20 I TARZANA 1 C_-A � I I I ,2&0 rr • � 1 i- C E . iJl\ TX 7Imo•y C _ 02502-1114 civic FAST MA L Pt .41TTIER, CA 0.2-S cl,.i Y OWN!120 21202 - - - - - - - - --y. 1 LEEJi PIE ■ram--- — — - - _- '1-` 'a - �� SIGNAL HILL , CA it - - - - - - -- - III 1 i i SE 79 s 1 ! MERCER 1SLANDi "—. A {.i `4 (_ - K^- ITH T _ 1 • 1_ _1 +11 i1`'1 }� Jam •_ '1- __ - _ _ __ - ' � .. _ y�-� - - -��!"� -,'1 7 : LOOT I PISTON INN pli _ LOPEZ02603329 FRANKFOWTAIN Fi - - CA 13:2 z 71: 1XI t..) I rl s.ri M I't J:l 211 f*l'l 1-71 17-1 I r i :K r •1 .IL I L.1 ri .7 1-4 t o rTl 'ji I'l Y's 1067-1 KEDGE AVE GAR DEN GROVE SLAKELY AilE _ .-_.__ = r= -. _ _ _ _ _.- -- _ N-. - _ t. 0 (/ *13 i EiD L-_ _ L_nEE 771 i - i i 444 E PEPPER _ -_,.. -- i - - I PW -f - - 7K__ toy 92603. 0— 0 f5—!71 1 _ _ _ — -. —_ ELLIOTT SSZO: Ph 1_ M tHUN �i 1�•1 - — _ — — — - _- - — — T IN r.T—a. a. r+ � yr 1 0 BOX 1='_' _�=_- _ LN -7 7. - - - - - - -- - - - —- - % RGHRIG 'jf-iT I NIGIF 1-3?41 C*ice 77 ERATIA Dili LLFi�_ • � ,A. .Trs_4_ — — 1f 1 • a I 1 ,T, , 4'i 1 'r .;I; r'r-1 r II ;I) 1•_ f I _I '. ' `'f . r ..; ' .I �' 1 t ...I 1• i I Ili I.. _ _. , ,t I (11 r-I ': i l'1 1.. r r • •' i I I ._: I _1 I - ' i ; I i1', � I 11 I r-I � �'r I r � •., ..., ,r', .,.1 • '�•- I' } } r'1 ' . 'f I-� -� �� 11•I { " •.. i•: I } ,'+� i I r I I. LI�I I ' + 1 ,_ , � I L1'r j' i , I. tl•, 1 , i •, I� 111 'r 1" I I } �I ' 1'lyl �� I:' I ,.•�� - .• 1 1 11.1 - , :! a- ,•1 , , ; I �� I�,I I - i _ � 1+.' .,: i :1 • � ..I •! ,,, � it �•°• � �I "7 r: -; '�1. �.is '•1 '�� /-' i 1 l .I . - ,:. ... ... -I • - f .w: •; L:�J "r; , .. �}. r ,i is_ ';C . . , I.,:. '•I F-^ 1,' ...� 1'. ..�� • 1. i 1,''y 'i .). •I�i i ' I� ` I�� '� .. .I i 7 �,' _Ir JI ' � 1:�:1 . 7� r 7 'r 1 ,I %A,' I.'I', I ' ; 1 1-''1 :r •; / ,1'1 r• -,1. ' r t ' ,' ,'I-7 , ,, I. ' �.1'1 ,• ._ �I;r I''I 11 I I I 11. t _ • I 1 , ; ` � ,' 1 ' �I:1 ,• .1 l!;1 � � i � 1 , '1 '•�. ,1 1"_ i I, i l _ � , , I,•, (i �. _ .I 1.J 1 i'l i il. I-•I (.1 '.+:1 T ,.; i. I' � :. _ — •• : j r;' . . iJ<, i a:T,: 'j' I •1 {:i +J:I '�! }-• fy 1..J I", '.:.' /^r�..� .�' ,•� }', •.r. t{, •� • "j �:.�► i I:J - .7:1 s'rT I F - '.' r ., LJwI j ! i 1'/ -C: r ' !, ..j 1'1 I .� CT ;x c (�"1 -.� F 7 .' ►' ''a r• I _1 I,rl ,•-1 ;'3. - — ,.' . ,"' �._ i r•I •�;;. y' - � •� -�+ x � 1'' r..� •., r}_ �., i.a• :y �•� 1 1� i• .... s'r 1 I,I;1 •- -� I•J,J l 1,1 1,1 1 �I ,1 1-� ,'r 1 '• ►'1 r"1�) 1 I-1 1..y 1� ,',:, ..., �-�� ►"1 �1 i 7•-..'I(,'',� t•'�L. �1.1 I,f�ff 11.1 .y, '~i i.L Ilw •,.1 N ( J �-7 .J ' 1 1 1•1 i. . .T° ' r,_1 i.l 1� ;...� f•. .:• 1 -� ,.,,. .,..' �I^ 1, •� f- .._,r .. ,.. ,-..J ..,. ._r '• r' i ,�1 l , u l Ll`I � ',.' ;�- ll:, Ili 1�'1 �} � 1,., •` Gw. ►J;1 n I•.� 1 yl (••i :' i,i /..•1,••� '� i ;i 1 �' l:1 1,�J 1,•�� 1'}I +,>� f.., L17.1 •�'• r. r'� 1, i ��1 I ,r y •[*y"� 11`1 ", (•i 1 LL 0) ti r i 1 1 �z 1rw. ! 1 �i1 ,., 1,•, I,LI 11J i I:y:I �.•�! 1�1 1 1�`.,1 I")'., 1 i,l'f 1,•I .•1 _ :. iL LI • .. 1 'I I' 1 !r_ T ,,..I I. i I '� t' ' " ...� I. ! •:� ! .. , ., I_i i:L. !. l l J I I,. '.l. 'J ,••, 1 ! r ti 1 i_- ,., I (' II i.' ; !... ; I i)I I•I-I I),I .• 1 l . ! .'"1 ll. ; 1 _ .. _ '1_ _ � :1 ,I'; i`I '' 1 ',I_ .a_.. .. j il•1 •' 1-.1 I.1 I, ' .I I -,' li-, '... + I... - I ' ' '� ' • ' ('..1 ' •I I 111 ' .. I I I ,!. _ t... � . !.. , ' 1 ,' 11.1 I �1 111 +'' i .f- �•I 1+l I''I I I�1 1)-, I ,i�1 r .I/ I'I I III -.1 i I ' , -' � ;• �� ->' .1 1 1 I 1 •I I I I I I1'I •I !'I .I i, 1 1'1 1 , 1 .( 1,.., I-•- , •! , 1 i rl 1�,, !I,_ I'•I.I '..' LI) I •1 I ? J r'I .. I)1 ll• l'_I I .,.. ;f. 'I L•'.1 ' - .',I ItI I ��' ,. • 1 1 •• ../ 1--1 1--1 ICI 'I t 1 -; - I-_i .. I I�1 I � ... ,',", 1'l �` i... 11-I {l. .'i_ 1. III _ , {.- I .; - -' - { ! - - .r1 1I I '!j I �•1 •, 1 , -� ,�� l i'1 J'�J. "+t ! , _.:1 1 I..J ,! L. .• I I I .:.., ' 1 ,•1 ' ,1 '' 1 J L It • •1 ''� 1•):I 1-4 , ,I i 1 I,ICI ' •� ' '•' _- I I - _ ' I -' i.y �.) '.'! 1•'•' .'!,1 _ ) I I,I .1 .,�_ i:'' III ' (.. _ ' 'J' li. ri� _ ' .,• Ita ,' :[. ' •� •. I1; I: ' I ' I-. ' 1•I, .i 1 tt�� {� C..y l'C• 1•I'I 1.] L�I71 ,. J , � 1. i 1 •'�' - ;� L'J_ :�; I t M� 7 .••� IL ..►. _-J l•, ,.,Y, P'I4 �.-1 J!. 1.1 ,ty 1.1'•• I.':1 �- .n. I 1 Lea •!� .L ��' �`. � � .-., 1, •1 -. I.1 )1 .. 1-_+ 1 >'�: 1~- ':.L I.I�f I.II r � 1 ►..� � i� �;�' ►.y 1,,,1 .��f••.••' i7: ... !" .. � f y. I I "' ,;- �i', I.1"1 1 I S:J, t r.,. Y• 1"rl '•J.. �7 I,11 I,� �-." I,I I .:: �^ Imo. ,_� 1'I I :�' - .L �:.. ) il. Lrj ' . �.`' 1 i ►-1 i j 1- r,:r 1;1;1 •..•' I'd -;_ 'J:' '1- i'yj ', ! ':IJ I.!.) ly a 1 •LI 4'� O'l 7C 'A✓ - 0:1 I 1 1 , i , I 11 I.. ••I -' '�� LL:: I i f i ' 'l '• i � I ' I 1•I '�I. r I-1 1,_,1 r• . . .I •. 11'I I•-I •• 1� (, �. ,,I I t... 1--I -. 1 1.1 ,. If, III il. T I t', ..1M , •i i i i : ' t - .... I , I. - 1... ,.I_I -� I t .. I.1 t .I 1l� 1•: , .f I11 ,(•1 i'1 �.! ''•I .. i:. '. ,-I I_I .1.1 L;I il' i';1 : / I I ` I I�,1 .I'I � ' , I I �1 � ' . _ ' •_ I i.. . ' ..1 ..a 1- ,1 '1:' 1•I 1 - •. 1., 1 Ii,l i ,li 1 1 I 1, :1 t.'.! 1' I •' I.! .1• ! 1�1 I a.l t ... 1 'I l! ..'1 �•1 '.I !f iil I�'I . I I-f I ! Li.i '' � .:i +!.I l is '_ ` ' 1 " ' ' " I. I-1 1 I LI _� ''� i'•'i 1:... '.+' i ;. - , I I i I I � ; •1 '•.1 I I I �I ! ,I 1..I 1 ri .1 .. ' ' ' 1� 1 :.' _ ' ' ' ' "1 I- .! 1 � 11'I 1 f' i I� 1- .I � 1 I -' ',I•' 1 '�1 j - '�., ,1' I{.! I-:.. ' '' • 1 ' 1 1'y I ' I 1 .I i �I '• ' t j 1 l 1 t '_l•I j•'' �.' ' ' I',I 1-a .l 1i1 ,..7 L'.� I '• 1 _ i- .... '''1. 1•.J �• lI. ryt LI i. 1 1 1 1 't• I_1 LJ1 1-• ljj Lam' i ' l.li' ..., ./. y r..� 1 - 1 I 11 i..r (•� •:�. ''•T ',,, 1_�r'f' �'• .. '. : •`, .. , .1 ,;( 1 1 1 '1 I"I '`� 1J1 •.:. I '.'.' �_�� -or 1'1_I •-� I:r� .4 .1'1 _ '. � � �t .:. I I •, 1!� �-'1 (�I �� ,::� .'"'•. I,1:1 I�I� 'I r .p, ...r - '-'•' �_. 1 '1 ♦� „fir 'r' 1'-I �I 6 17.4fl 1",�I ..�- 1 �'1 i:. ... f I•1 1� +:,'', ' r ^ il,..i ..� f-f ,,j`I F-I r...l ►..�11� . � . 1f .... ,r"(;•If 1f•1".4� I U. .� L1I LI tiw 1-- - �'� +''� � � wj _I i„� .,',! i•,1 y,., iJ.l i'..; (:1 •fJ .,I I"'••i '•"ii`I '�. + .tJ -! .�_ LJ,1 l,Jy 1.'•1 -_. U 1 l'} I"•.l .� e1 �,!. r'f lln I:�I ��•.� +.r .", i 1;1 1'. I�,I ';, I'!.• !' I i j.J '•w' .1` l ! 'f I!. ' y '1.. 1'� I/i,1 `T f, `' 1•••1 I,�'f ^�Y I' EL.E'� .�. �.i__.- F i.- . _ i YtN i' rr7i .��i_ tl'•C !'_. Hsi IiV£il)hl t�' GEC: RO ER _ i by 5!_0,941 r. '�-:�►_ HL r Ail 6 �.�r.._ �'-^_•f��i ail E_L ... _ - - - - - --. -._-_. - - - _ - __ - sir �. lri•' ._ - .-! -• ' - - - -- - - - - - - - - _ — _ e - I i •-�I ,��1 'FF _may ..• I .--_ ___ - _ - - - - _ - - - _ - - - 2O 22 PALT AM CUR = - •-• - = _{- .012116 --'i- - �- i- - -- - _ - — - - - - - -- - - PL =•tip f�-i F��r r _:� �._� _ _ _. . -- -.. _ _ _ _ -.. - _ - - _ _ - -' - - -'- - _t �1 _I. L ! •T•_ - l 2 1 -- r s - a i- B HEARS EARL L i21 _ .,q RET : .SEEt-` i it <: i - = . " lit 7 MLTA,W1 AVE - _ ---- + -_'i��i.:CSC• - `- - - - - _ -� - - - -r �LiF�i� i?II�;T6� � C�{fi : _ , �1; ter`-_+ `� 014 . GRAFT EC L ET -'-- -:f{k� klb-1,:':,E Y�_ �, .� _.' . ..- _ �� •+_._ �,_ -ter- —. . �-.=.�ii.,r, _ . 1��.•,iY i/1ri31�11 LI�, iF �rl•1 ?i_,_'+1`_� .�_• - -_ — �• �i-• s... -`� F _ _-�_.-, '��,fT�� _ -.1 �f'1 _ice r_ -_'- ; ;�---"��-'+ -_•�.-�`J.'sic t. ._ ,: - _ - S 211 E. _:lay N i :Pita i -fit•= f•iL-=E_I�s•S :...i'� � '�'� - - `.,_., _—•— — — —_ •-• - - —•_.-_ '_ PDIN ALij,1rj•; L_14 - - - ram- - -.-0 ►'. ♦. -T• - •r-. � - -- {� 41t _ - ,-Nsr HA'ELn I SiG ALA" __ _ F r�` n W. t �� - - C - T1L' +` 1- 1�%� rLCIS I-DA LT - E1�=r4 r .�4''13T ON BCH +-.Z•: I��.�:i!_. JI_ .�'f' -�,'T�•, . •�sd r_:'_-. , �:7 a_•_'j'_ - 41 _ Eft �t�f7i_ ! e L i t sL •-=�_11 _ _'f' �: � • - -. r-' LN ilk i Fa,'�.Y •~�+.r 1 '�IY ��11� 'L i i-�y�._ .'! _ -� f _. .. _ -- _ "_ _ _ - _ - .. ` 4f..L L T I'[" :.'•r .-._- .=,� ___: _ -.-_' --- - .=ti,. _ F r�r+ci..is `'a l INA iN . ..:�`_'l. 5?�17t1 a_..-._ ,— _ _� ice. a _ ..-.— _ •—__.- - � i L��tJ r._ .L IL : ? r lFi� t;�:�A �: _: Ate I A C i 5 GERIMAIN ARTS L z - l i n •�f _�_2: �">ltry. 1 ►'.I Y- . ��•i r`. �t j T CA 92�4 - - SILMAN ram!- i 1^. ti A fi CAROL L.i� ter• xHL l��lYAL-" t�-• 1.` itl'�k r 1 ! �-:; _ _ -. _,- - `' - - _ - _ - _ — - - "17� ti.'V. ,.i`- ._�iLl �• it L�- ._°- i'_:}� _ �}:L:.1 l�l l `j',� � - � ._ — ` _ -=._._.{;, ._ . _ - - - ��` ='i'.:!-a'��''ir•.7 i t�s`i L-�-f-': r i.i-� .. � •t L--� �•:�f::fir _ -C _ - _-. _ ' - - _ _ .t-. �,+�'J Tt�i� — _ir i i..'-� '��'�`_ T •` tis h.i=•1. " _�__•---'r� • ` _ + _ y J - ulyi�. .L T y•_ _ is.__-. •'h!_. _ _ _ _ _ - - - — — _ - 1•y. _ Y�_--�J\ La•v+ t ','Y _ - - - - _ �- ,•F'r a a -�� 1: L !!i a•2�� \�_• - t ILIf f I W-rC Id t••r 02S132? _ 'r 1• ti i..l'! .'-+r � : T _ •� G i'a, J'.:' i e i I tir �� 7 art �� .r• r..� �_ - 1 _ .. i a 1-.it -_t.-. _ ,1 • - r _ _ TID iN � •- • .�_r`_:�_ --�° -�'��`- . . .-- � ��'`-1�- i7LAN M & LJ IMBERL LN 11 *3TON BCC, L .i ..'i i ii�.:•:J�u••f I;tl'�!`._ w . t `t _�_. .r i - _.• . - — _ _ _ _ _, .- _ , _ _ -__ --_ � -;� e - 1*SET a -.-{ - •4-• � � tv _ - ice_•• � +.: S -. - __ - - -a. _ - -' �•St] a.r.� F-Jv�1 J .:�'! --��i' a�'- _ - _ a-l- •' _ - - - - __ !a_�M._ ry: -f'• «_-'t_• : • - psi :OTOP N -`!-, ; 2 1 a 1•t"1f YJ_c� POINT F: gay f;f w J _ `��=''� - = is - - - -. •� . L.{ �_ _ E UT I A A vE its;;NER 1:71 t�J t��-';• t 1 TCA AVE -�-•v 1ll.F�� 1 F J f'.y . • i. M . ~' _'r ' .1 i X i'�':i ! _�f 1j i = _ M1 _ I`{ice M—AtJAR�E r- i '-'_. :'<<-._= !:'R;17' 77 -SLt ST '1. i . 1- C r a-I E wro �{�5 y71 - ' - -.-: - .__• _ - -, 7-- •-.� - r TI_ DELAWARE 0306 i - . _ L•L��1 irFiE�_ ,1 _ IA i Z _ ra_i?; .. HUA LN US 12*142 -` SO?-' -= - - A - - F-,4G F 1 t ;ti HUN �._ ,'TON _ _ CA 1 , _ 917 i;t NA -R��? fi�r7 } L.i� YOUNG AN I T4 C 192:2: F STAHL t---.N:-qISTOPWR C RE WILL IS L,Jt° '_O E ,mac y- = i «h IE '3i FiVEiVI =: W CISCNAHE?P ST2100 U :� Lev BrH, CA 9011 Acr INGT BCH, CA 926L� E ,:: L FV _LL�_U RiMPRT •� ;1::_': _. =�1_ ;:�__ ' :=MASH I T_A .3 ; _ _ TEVEN M 1611 RI�+ERVI�.'.t} CIR i=�_ '� RI '�•_� yi��'_�� } r.�t�. • __aa L_ _ 1 • T t - I iF. : :'.138ERT 4' TX ! :j, a _ 1_rl. ��FL�.L -'is _ 7 it .- a;�:: r L E-• •,��' r z 1 HIT., . i.4 ;�N E-'H . CA :i';' _ _. _- _._ _ _'i i; =T��J t�•:i , =-r? == :r. ' !: —..-- E t'`N HIT i •1. s`L. _ _ e_: - _ —'t •C:-�•�: I 1 1�_ i�l� 1 ic�i F TU4'i13 �'�•' - �.L_N t-.H rs �1 1 [ r 1-:A A 709 ki#'ice N 41 L G-kL. s.r.k 'ter 1_r_ _.i-`s•.. r;S L L_ _-r- iCj[:-- ss 1�•EJ<T}P IFW 'C1 R J�, J - #� ��'4 xTr l-t S-71 - - -cy ,J r` ~ -- --_ _- - oa' I�•. .•�•'�__ -�•� _.•� --� .�i W 1 1`..1E� BC 7 p CA �lL�� OL�i4t't•1 j AR HALL D:'t4ALD H0FlKl--'4-,S TIMOTHY 160:� HTFF 1 R r- T CIP '+k=`i''1'j+•f'-_ .�,�:-._ r.l 1rSr -� -�� T•ti,- ti i - � ILL EL Tj -,' _ t ILL i - _. - - -• _ - _ 2 _ _ K... _ . -. . - •--�-. - Hx_- if, A _. • _ _. _ .- _ ' �. . .J MIT L-!_.J•• •�_- = }'4'_ St _-•1 - - _.[ . - _ r r_ _ _ _ _ --- ,`'r�ii_•i �L'J_� Tf%�__. i 647 .44 02 --4416 DALE G'_'PH F;'!3--3 5SALENT , A R - - rJ ?•1 -:� inn 1 - - WR I T DAV, T jCjH SHAL _ 0 14419 _ I�� '! r"��tR i r't _� _ .: i: i-=._�h:' ~ `�t AVE #� _;t�_' �ii';=11�i�'�J�I 1•. ., �T _ = t A:-OVA L N , 1=- Pf• j G F{�k - 14.121 612 AMBER DR � s HIJi E � �� c•1 .1� ��l,r �j "NO R-36ERT SJ SCH CA WESE, ' TEr r't '1 - -- - - - Jib E'' iiNP f� OR C01 i��IC�_!h u#; �' _ =' � 'sty �' �r;•r--i-.;;• ; .- - .. . 4 Z� - rn• �_!',f)•! tr025 1 MUG - - _� 4c 2s j 4441 SIS AMBER Nil r - - f S -. a r-. tom•- L�.I�.AY` '�` r'•if`r�'�'1 _a�- 1 .`t�� 1r . E�N60�4 AMER DR + INNIS ' �- --:. _._ __-- I!lI✓4fT T�:"tiTi■\f r..., . s _ _ _ -: -`ib x + i 444 - i , �'E�_=i�:c ., ;1i,�r�''�' L C�J �'T1s� y��iR♦iritLr' �'LM f`#Q - 611 AMBER _•i•_ rir =�C `� ' 2`" -'-Q E J-NOIRMAt4DY FL 1 CKNELL KURT ! x-, _ - —1'` � <<C 1 __B�■B I t �t RUNTANHILL OR f V lr :1!_'!� i ...lip I Ji'a 3=��_:J t t i t= -tiCH, CA S it �-e l}` 1 _ 32 , _-.1 � i �. �! _ :'i _'?t _ � _ _ �h T iatiiVYk�iv ��.}7 - --A --2E.4 - DEPT �.�-: -}' �r•.if;�'' l-'r _' _ ;� i_. . _�. . ,ice':- = _:i_�.'^...LL� i�. ��:�I'�i•_ -�`_ '.: H NT a NG s ON E',C L. -----A 5264.3 ! . -I ti � _."its ■ _ - _ - _ � _ tout' a. - �a _ .—. 1.y=y CA i -"._ _ 1.44_ _RUNTi` BARVIEL _ �,r.' f'.�•h T �.-_�`- - - - - - � - i•.��_.p..L•:-[-•. � _.`i_ --� aC �17~ra:"J�''T• L. � ~_ :2 61 iL Y r - - D 1 i-.-_E':' FM.111'_ti� .� x •7 I r_r - 716 .� . �_' _ .Y _:S _ a-_f-•.. H 1.-.'t .-.l G T�-.fVy 1_''_! i• i�7� -� +-1�_ _ J C I S I S LAKESIDE LN _y= N Nr WPORT A-;E 1 SOS LAKESIDE LN AL 025144E.8 00,1400 'J, C1�'.D NA L D E WAR C, 02S14470 WILLIkM E HUN F 1 No?TV ' 'N" PCH; 92648 SOS AMBER DR 11MUNGTON 1XII, OG Y'S 1-3503 -:--`EPU---CHj0 VIRGINIA RAE A 2 i uz HAP! Hit N 7, 1 T. -H . ET : L -Z 7: C. :)7 Ell 1E,0-7 4'z- P;: L '7 4- EL-- L T T —TI T—LC-REST Q-11 m 149:%*77 it to 5.77-2 2y page 13 - Council /Agency Minutes ou The City Clerk presented Ordinance No. 2980 for Council consideration - "Ali ORDINANCE OF THE CITY Of HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINCTON BEA04 ORDINONCE CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 9061 TO PROVIDE FOR CHANGE OF ZONING FROM OLDT0101 SPECIFIC PLAN (DISTRICT' TWO) WITH OIL SUFFIX TO OLJDTOW. SPECIFIC PUN (DISTRICT T140) WITH OIL SUFFIX FOR DRILL.rNG PURT ES ON REAL PROPERP, GENER- ALLY LOCATED BETWEEN DELAWARE STREET TO THE FAST, RUCHEST ER AVENUE TO ►FE SOUTH, CALIFORNIA STPEET TO THE NEST, ANO SPRINGFIELD AVENU; TO T'HC NORTHO (ZONE O MiGF NO. 88-11 ) . " (Seri ngfi el d Oil kricovery Project - Angus 0111 On motion by Erskine , second Creen, Council adapted Crdinar,,•e ND. 2900, after reading by title, by the following roll call vote : AYES: MacAil ', ster, Green , �, Par,nister , Mays , Silva, Lrskine NOES: Winched ABSENT: None PLAN A motion was made by Bannister, seconded by Mays , to accept the resi gnLtion of Jim Silva from the Plan►i in;; 1:ommi sslon . 1Nhc motion carried by the Following roll call vote : AYES : MacAllister, G*'ec fi , W i ache l l , Bann i s to r• , Mays , Er-ski na HOES : None ABSTAIN : Si l .,a , ASSENT: None 4 P-L NING--QM AEI NTMr'N�..w_At k 1� � �9f �'�` RI![IL[ ,LA6 On motion by Bannister , second MacAllister , Council /Agency unardmously rati - fied the appointment to flit: Planning Comni ssior, of barry Wi i I iams . LE..T7e&JROM MAY 03_..g�N,�" AP_ bTME_E_.UF tAUyCILMAy..I'�s1�A1�3�I�R.�.�� (tESOLUTTI(lS .III� :..rUfLl EA F. .3LLWRy18 CITIES on motion by Frskine, second Flays , Council /Agency unaninviusly approved author- ization for the Mayor to nerd a letter to the League of Cal i forni e. Cities recommending the appointment of Councilman MacAi1ister to the Resolutions Committee. Following discussion , Mayor Bannister dissolved the Mayor' s Committee . i 1, 16 ay... • 1 w�'1 r; i r l Page ld - Cnuncil/Agency Minute; 1275188 71 SUEF M ENSEFE C17Y =' HE Cmcilmn Erskine requested the City Administrator to direct staff to survey th# finished graded pad along 20th Street of the Palau Str*et Project to ensure Oat it is not higher than specified by City code. f M W Saonistar requested Council members to notify hip, cf team prcference for Washington Team or Sacramento Team for the purpose of obtaining additional funding 1tr• the City. In addition, councllmembers will travel to liashlvgton or Sacramento for the same reason . On motlun by 143ys, seconded by Erskine, Council approved and made a determin- ation that the need to rake action on the issue of Counci 1 /Agency liaison to board, commission and coa>mi ttee appointments arose subsequent to the agenda being posted as specified in Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2) by the 1 following roll call vote. AYES: MacAllister, Green, Winchell , Bannister, Mays . Silva, Erskine 5: Bone ABSUT: None 1 A motion was made by HatcAl 1 i ster seconded by Erskl roc to approve the I following appointments; WMTION 015TRICT- Primary -• Don MacAllister Primary - John Erskine Al terisa►te - Jim Si iva Ai tarnate -• Wes 3anni ster LEAME. Of„CALIFORNIA -CITIES I V. 'fA�T 'QN UT;,TRIC #11 Primary - eon' MscAl l i ster Primary - Tom Mays Alternate Jim Silva Alternate - Was bannister hLUER ARIS.."10 MIE CITI - Gracd Winchel l Jim Silva John Erskine Grare Wi nchel l l lJE5T QC H&TIER IWRQ 4M F JULY EXECUTIME 08 Crake Ni nchel l Peter Green Wes ;',znni ster Trm Mays Don MacAllister L 91CA 4 ITTr"n.�, MIEREROKI Primary - John Erskine Tom days Peter Green Peter Green } Alternates - Grace Winchell Wes Bannister .L.- — ------ --- Y ' +. i SAYS• '•.,e.r wiry. , • + ! 77 . ' %lot, •1� 1 « ' r " yy l •d 1 t.• f. r r •I 4- Ali 44: • CERTIFICATION STATE. OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY Or• ORJ NGE CITY OF HUNTINCTON BEACH ) t i 1 - i I , CON14IE BROCUMAYj CITY CLERK OF THE CITY' OF ' HUNTINGTON E8ACHj DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the ,- attached is a full. ' and true and correct copy of the attached li3ting of administrative records of the city ' s proceedings relating to Use Permit 89- 25/Zane Change 88'-1.1/SEIR 88-- i as follow : S.o.C.k l o n : Staff Document Numbers : ( 2 . 04 ) (2 . 17) ( 2 . 18) ( 2 , 21 ) ( 2 . 35 ) ( 2e36') ( 2 . 41 ) (2 . 42) ( 2 . 43) ( 2 . 44 ) ( 2 . 45 ) ( 2 . 46 ) ( 2. . 47) (..".1 . 48) ( 2 . 49) ( 2 . 51) - . .� 1 .1i. ons/Ord i So�tir�n _ nan�ces bocum'en Numbers : ( 3 i 0:t?: (3 . 03) ( 3 . 04 ) Sect. ._.Rss1 ,Y .,.SAY Code Proyi.s i ans r Document Numbers : ( 5 . 01) Chapter 8 . 40 - Noise Control ( 5 . 02) Chapter 8 . 60 - Civil Defense Emergency Se ry icer3 (.5 . 03) Chapter 958 - Oil Districts '4 DATE: C-.NNNIE BRCCKWAYj CITY C oa CITY dF ::UNTINGTON BEAT*H , ,�.E, •.# _ .�• •i• •} }, :;l�f�.j. fir .�+t�•4;�•r ! YI�{ka�'+�• ..r'�,/- `� •Y �1+ S 1�' -'' 1 r e,r` .y. 1 t . • � ,X a , ly a4 ti ll ai a " ,?r. .U" dry:; ''< � •. , 'rr CEPTIFICATrON STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) r MUM OF ORANGE ) a S . a ' CM OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) ; s I CONNIE BROCKWAY, CITY CLEM OF THS CITY OF HUNTINGTON � BEACH. DO HEREDY CERTIFY that the attached is a full and true and crxecti,�pF of the attached listing of administrative records { X410tfngto the c ty' s proreyedi.nds relating to Use Permit 8��151206.0 Oh. ago t38�lx/$EY�t 08� I as follows ; Tocument' Numbers : (2 . 04 ) ( 2 . 17) ( 2 , 18) (2 . 21) ( 2 . 35) (2 . 35) (2 .41) ( 2 . 42). (2 . 43) ( 2 . 44 ) ( 2 . 45) (2 . 46) (2 . 47) (2 . 48) (2 . 49) (2 . 51 ) Documeist Numbers : (3 . 02) (3 . 03) (3 . 04 ) Doc:utp4nt Numbers : 5 . 01 Chapter 8 . 40 - Noise Control 5 . 02 Chapter 8 , 60 - Civil Defense - Emergency Services 5 . 03 Chapter 95d - Oil Disti icts DATED: CONNIE BROCKWAY, MTY CLERK CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH t •� arrifiY,yn�r ' ,,, h r• , ,, „ r ' r.. :!QIY��'M } " 't��11i°r u4+1` R'' "tip 6r !1'1NI ,/R,', r'I �'ri. ' � �,,') �°��r��M`:'..,M. .r �,y + Y • „ }h" V_�'w�a� lip* L •rt• we iR0A ff r r F NTY OF CitAM ` CITY OF NWTIN" BEACH ) F ti d r I CONNII BROCCKMAY. CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEAC4. DO N IY CERTIFY that the attached it a ful 1 and true and correct copy of the Attached l i sti rrf of admi ni strati ve records relating to Use Permit 88-25/Zone +"e 88-11/SE R 88.1 as follows: ,;; . 1' ?L._�rt�t.�..�8�3�C3'�I�oorrdence/Noticps .4atoWt Nombers: (4) (17) (18) (21 ) (35) (36) (41 ) (42) (43) (44) (45) (46) '(47) (48) (48) (51 ) taceent Nuftert : (2) (3) (4) SIMtjan 5* g2j SYant_ C�%X Qd2 proy,i s i ons Chapter 8.40 - Noise Control Chapter 8.60 -- Civil Defense - Emergency Services Cftitptor 868 - Oil Districts 4Z DATED: CONNIE BROL10MY, CITY CLEW CITY OF HUNTI NGTON BEAD •.�kA'+•r�•11,tii+ids,;•, c -, '+ 1 ry 'i a•' h G'.'�i' ;? 'i' i. J'Jh;,•' .' 1" „ 01 ., s,.,y ' • 1'�',r,��,;, •,,,' . , . P ','„f!�. SI;, �. •' , '� 5> R, AMINIATRATIV9 WORD i Ir. ;.. A09US **tag*20um/6pr1ngfie14 Area tail, Recovery project n 1 F, Section 1z 1tn1:'i r*nNenta1 1mpa�;t Reports/InEormation ' Y v Y V)lhr ro-) it 0 braf t Supplement to Environmental Impact Report •e • — e6-1 . Revised Draft Supplement to Ervironn'iental Impact Report - 86-1 Final Supplement to Environmental Impact Report 86-1 (volume I ) Final Supplement to Environmental Impact Report - 86-1 (Volume II - Additional Appendices ) Waterfront Traffic Impact Analysis , prepared by + LSA Associates , Inc . Environmental Data Rase prepared by Dennis R , Arlan. Section 2 : Staff Reports/Carrespondence/Notices 00C. No $ Date pf oLipat., t1D �&Y)YNN 1 1 8/26/86 City of Huntington Beach memo from William S. Amsbo'ry, City Attorney , to j James W. Palin , Director , Development ' Services 2 6/6/88 City of Huntington Heath, General Application Re Planning Co;rnission (with attachments) 3 5/31t88 Letter from Catherine O' Hara , Assistant Planner , City of Huntington Beach, Lo the Office of the Governor, Office of Plannino and Research, re notice of preparation of draft SEIR No . e8--1 I •;j ,>: rr �lM. ,,.r lN",ter, + x r W9 , a 1 goo Dun •. I , ��}!H'M}�,r,4+ ,,� „ ,�•'r(.... �y '+ ,x. '� �'I,h7f,'�,"1,�]I�f'I�, .' ips 'y.-• , '-i • J'� ' 4yy S„+ Y i 6r46 multi-page report ontikXed "dpringf ie ld Area Oil Recovery PV10104t Notice of Preparation Scoping �X ! 6111#9 Letter from Mike ►dams , PlaaniAQ 1. D�toator t to the Honorable Chaitman �Anning commissioner's trenareitting r 4 tic* of Pre0arati.on for Prnpased iti'eation project ` 6/08/68 Notice from the State of California office of Planning and Research to ' Reviewing Agencies re City of Huntington 8ekwh NOP for Angus Petroleum Springfield Area Oil Recovery SCH #86040417 7 7/11/88 Letter from Boyd D . and Linda L. Wheeler to Msyor Erskine 8 8 /10/88 Handwritten form entitled .: 00evelopment Review Request , " from D . Blgr,s , Huntington Beach Police Department 9 0/`17/88 City of Huntington BeF�cY� Memo to t Distribution from R. Franklin re conditions for approval of Angus project ,.r 10 8/16/88 Letter from Mike Adams , Planning Director , to the Office of 1P13nning Research re Notice of Completion for D -lift EIR 86'-1 and SEIR 86-1 11 8/19/88 Memo from Mike Adams , planning Director , to the Planning Commissioners transmitting Draft EIR 66-1 and Draft SEYR 88--1 12 8/19/88 City of Huntington Beach memo from Catherine O'Hara to Distribution transmitting Draft SIR 86µ1 and Draft �SEIR 88-1 13 8/19/88 Memo from Mike Adams , Planning Director , to Paul Cook, City Administrator, transrnitting draft EIR 86-1/Draft Sm 88- 1 -2- 4 T°� � ) .,MSS '�� ♦ ,� {I•r, r M 4 4 r ►7• i ry err .. , � �1. • 4/24/06 Front of Publication re Notice of PUblio Hearing - Department of Community Devolo nt xnvi ro"Obtal •' '' MosoUrce8 Section City of Huntington Bosch 9t$0 pgcwatnt ontitl*4 4not,ipo of public 4.X109 ,to %one Chang*, No . 8IIw-3,1ri?se vo emit � � 8d-x8/Rnvironmental Impact Report No . 88-1" ~ ' 1� 9/13/88 Letter from Mary M. Parrish, Concerned Citizens of Huntington Beach , to Cstherine O 'Hara , Huntington Basch Community Development Department , "ate: Draft Supplement rmpact Report No. 86-l " ( 9/88 review of Draft Supplemental HIR attached ) aw. l,7 9/14/88 Letter from Mary M. Parrish, Treasurer, ,Concerned Citizens for Huntington Beach , to Planning Commission and Council Members (vista Del Mar Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions attached) l8 9119188 First American "itie lnsuranc:e ) Company Quarantso (Schedule A and mailing labels attached) % ►nn,.w 19 9/19/88 City of Huntington Beach memo from / Catherine O'Hara, Assistant Planner , to Distribution, re Screencheck Supplemental EIR pd,014n7 20 9/22/88 Letter from John D . Carmichael to Bob Franklin, Huntington Beach Development Services , Re Springfield I Project Fire Mitigation MeaSUres � �1 9/26/88 Letter From Daryl Phillips, Phillips i Steel Company, to Robert Franklin , Associate Planner , Huntington Beach Planning Commission 22 9/26/88 Letter from John D . Carmichael , Angus Petroleum, to Bats Franklin , Huntington Beach Development Department , ate Noise Control ( land use compatibility chart attached) W ^ i �� ►�� 9/27/86 Proof of Publication to Notices of Public Hearing - Zone Charge No . SO-11/Use Permit No. 88-28/ 'w Nriviironmentol Impact Report No . 88-1 r $4 9/30/88 Letter from Concerned Citixons for Huntington Reach, to Huntington Beach Planning Commission, transmitting documents for City Council review In "JYconsidering Angus Project (documents attached) 25 10/2/88 Letter from Milton H . Marow to Planning Commission 26 Undated Petitions circulated by the Conocrned Citizens for Huntington Beach ,I 27 10/4/811 Planning Commission Staff Report re + � Zone Change No. 88-11/Use Permit No . 88-8/Env,ironmental Impact Report 88i-11 . 28 10/5/88 Latter from William D. Holman, �+ Huntington Beach Company, to the Community Development Department , City of Huntington Bauch, re review of Supplemental EIR 86-1 29 10/6/88 Letter from Edward W. Tuck to Chairman Leipzig and Planning Commission Members 30 10/10/68 Noise Control Activn Pl ;,n for the Springfield Waterf lood Project + 31 10/13/88 City of Huntington Beach request for Legal Services 32 10/14/88 Letter from Klaus Goedecke to Victor Leipzig , Planning Coromiss ' -)n Chairman 33 10/17/83 -City of Huntington Beach Request for + Legal Services + 34 10/18/88 Fesponse by the Chambers Group , Inc . , to Comments received re review of Draft Supplemental EIR •-4 '`w . i!n ARWAI 10/18/88 Planning Commission Staff Report number C-4 a pro Graft 6212 So. $8-l and MIA No . 8 6,-1 for the pro coed Spsingliold Oil itncovmry Pro *ct (in Ti .. conjunction with tone Change No . 88-11 8nd Use permit No . 88�-25) . , Attachments : Sirr0ta Shoot , Comment Letters re Draft Supplement SIR and 119,0 Responses tc Comments on Draft Ouppiement 919 an-1 SIR, Findings and " Facts i n 8u pport of Findings regarding Angus STR, Statement of Overriding Considerations , and Resolution No . 1407 p� [ 36 10/ 18/80 Planning Commission Staff Report r ' f aG ' number C-4b re Zone Change No . 88-11/Use permit 140 . 88-25 tin conjunction with supplemental SIR •' No . 88'-1 ) . Attachments : Area ",sap, Site, Evaluations, and Landscape Plans , Previous Findings and Considerations for Approval of ;t Project , draft Ordinance, Comparison of Current and Prior Springfield :� . Project , Letters in Support and l ' Opposition of project 37 10/18/08 Planning Comerinsion meeting minutes , including adoption of 88IR No. 88-1 And recertifying SIR No . 86--1, adoption of Resolution No . 14D7 and Statement of Over-riding Considerations j 38 10/19/88 Planning Commission Zone Change Notice of. Action for. Conditioned Approval (with attachments) 39 10/27/88 Notice of Appeal from City Clerk to Planning Department re Concerned C,itiaent ` Appeal (10/26/86 letter from Concerned Citizens to Mayor Erskine re same attached) 40 10/28/88 Notice of Appeal from City Clink to Planning Department re Appeal of Planning Commission Action by Councilwoman Grace Winchell ( 10/27/88 memo from Grace Winchell to Mayor and City Councii re same attached) -5- •• ! l Fyy,'7',T'�'• i, "f',A6 f MO r A 5 1Al i*tter from Concerne4 Citisonx for Nontington Pooch to Huntington Teach City Council member transmitting 40nument• for City Council Review in �•,' , ;'., cohmi.dersti.dr) of Angus Project coglD (40curnents aEtsahed) A01 /10/88 Vocumont entitled "Notice of Public Hearing rep Appeal to Planning Commission ' s Approval of Zone Change •'`' No . 88-11/Use Permit No . 88-25/SEIR No . 68-1 and EIR 86-1" �4 11/10/88 City of Huntington Beach memo f ram `' Arthur J . Folger , Acting City ., Attorney, to City Clerk re notification of the public on Code Amendment 8$-3A; 2C88-11; and Code Amendment 88-•25 11/11/68 Proof of Publication re Notice of Public Hearing - Appeal of Planning Commission ' s Approval of Zone Change No . 88-11/Usa Permit No . 88-25/6LIM No . 88-1 and EIR 86-1 `:'' •' C4i) 11/17/88 Letter from John D. Carmichael , Angus Petroleum Corporation, to Mayor Erskine, Mayor Pro I•einp, and City Council members . Attachments : Statement of Dr . Edward D . Helton to the Huntington Beach City Council , storage tank designations , District Maps re -81 zoning, City of Huntington Beach report entitled "Preserving Surface Access to Underground Oil Reserves in Developed Areas , " and City of Huntington Beach report entitled "Fiscal impact of Oil Operations in Huntington Beacn" r 4� 11/18/88 Letter from Arita Young to the Mayor and City Council 47� 11/21/88 Request for City Council Action �+ submitted to Mayor and City Council by Paul Gook, City Administrator 11/21/88 Transcript of Public Hearing re Zone Change No . 88-11,/Use permit No . �74 86-25/Supplemental EIR No . 88-1/EIR No . 86--1 -6- ,,r. r r, .. •r. I , a 3 , �• der , 11/21/64 Council/Agency Ni"Uto* . .11/23/8A Notice of Patermination filed by the Cart o Kunti�ton $060h with the Off co of Planning & Research and the Counts of Orange 12/5/80 Co►inci l/Agency Minutes Sect]on 3 : Resolutions/Ordinances Dam, NON valid 2RICK12tIAG 1 10/18/88 Planning Commission Resolution No . 1407 - adopting Supplemental EIR go . 88-1 and SIR 86-1 for. the Springfield Oil Recovery Project , c z 11/21/88 Huntington Beach City Council� ►, Resolution No . 5954 -- certifying Supplemental EIR No . 88-1 and EIR . � No . 66-1 for the Sprirgiiald oil Recovery Project 3 12/5/88 City of Huntington Beach Ordinance No . 2980 - amending ordinance Code section 9061 for a change of zoning to Oldtown Specific Plan with suffix for drilling purposes on real property 12/13/68 proof of Publication Notice of Public Hearing - Legal Notice Ordinance No . 2980 +; Section 4 : Huntington Beach General Plan i 6/84 Huntington Beach General Plan, adopted December, 1976 , amended through June, 1984 i I -7- ctiq o Relevant City Code Provisions F :1 Noise Control Chapter 8 . 00 Civil r defense--Omrgency Services r h •.`�d- 1 Article 060 - Oil Districts IN rf NY P .. c r V•w r:� tf 0, Pod 12 Counci 1/Jn�,q Hinutei - l 1121 M" C TINUER OPEN TO_.120188 - RE54i11T191 WA MEN CL ARIVA - MUE I QIL IN1181 ENINENI =IN - Tho Mayor announced that this was the day and hour ist for a public• hearing y continued open from W961r 21 , 1988 to consider the adoption of Resolution of Nactlssi ty rrlativo to acquisition of surface oil interests in connection With completion of the Phase I Project within the Main-Pier Project Area as amindO- ( 121 & 123 - 2nd Street , 120 & 122 - 3rd Street , - A.P. 024-166-02 L. a 09) a A motion was made by Bannister, seconded by Kelly, to continue the open public h^arinyy to December 8, 1968 to consider the adoption of Resolution of hecessity relative to acquisition 07 turface oil interests in connection with completion of the Phase I Project within the Main-Pier Area as amended. The motion carried by the following roll tali vote: AYES: Kelly, Green, Finley, Erskine , Bannister HOES: None ABSENT: Mays, Winchell (out of the room) Councilman Mays and Winchell returned to the room. P (Q U Council ) PUBLIC H .Y S - USTAINE IC,,AND REKI ED 'EREAL W IONE CHANGE w - ■ SERWEILL0 OIL i REMERX ERQ=.— (AM OIL) f The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing to consider an appeal to Planning Commission' s Approval of Zono Change No. 88.-11/Use Permit No. 88-25/Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 88-1 and Environmental Impact Report No.. 86-1 . iJ 1 Aggl �anti : Angus petroleum Corporation Appeli ati: 1 . Councilwoman Grace Winchell 2. Concerned Citi2ens For Huntington Beach l.Qutign:, The project site consists of two blocks located on opposite corners as follows: Block A (Tract 12?47) : bounded by Springfield Averue,. Delaware Street , Rochester Avenue and California Street; and Block 8 (Tract 127461 ■ oounded by Tironto Avenue , California Street, Sprinq- field Avenue and Huntington Street . Proposal: Zone Change: Rezone Block i� ('bract ' 12747) from "O1dtown Specific Plan-District Two-Oil Facilities (OT-2-0) " to "Oldtown Specific Plan-District Two-Oil Faci 't i ti es with Oil Dri l l i ng(OT-2-01 ) " to al low the dri l ling of new oil wells . : To develop an oil consolidation drillsixe on Block A and asso- ciated oil facility on Block B. Also requested is a reduction of exterior sidoyard setbacks from ten ( 10) feet to a minimum seven (7) feet for the north and south elevations of both blocks . tac , 4 wyy. w� t r p •1, oil pryy .,� I�t,•, n4: q ' ,,,Q i, { .• ,r; i ORDINANCE NO► 2960 zN 8 qF THE CITY O! tiQNTIN�i'f'DI4 BEACH JIMI�IFIING A 061 OF VEE HUNTXNQTON SUCH 0XVINANCP � CODE TO . Olt CHANOR OF IONI NG ON REAL PROPERTY GENEFtWr'J w';i,•,'; �,. ]R4 " 160 ACASS SOUTH Of HAMILTON AV219UR AND W26T NAGNOLth STROET ( .BONE CHL0 6 NO. 87-14 ) i9,jPF.X8, pursuant to the State planning and Boning Lair, the r. Huntington Reach Planning Commission and Huntington Beach City j4 Council have had separate public hearings =alative to Zone Change No . 87 14 wherein both bodies have careful . y considered all information presented at said hearings , and after due consideration of the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission and all evident:e presented to the city Council, the City Council finds that !'such zone change is proper, and consistent with then General Plan, NOS►►', THEREFORE, the City Counc 1 of the City of Hunt;ngr-on Beach does ordain as follows : SECTION 1 . The follow ng described teal property. Generally � Located approximately ). rOOO feet south of liami.lton Avenue and l r I00 f ee r wes 6 of Magnolia -street is hereby changed from Z,uD7o--CZ-r?2 (Limited Ilse District Comoined with Gil Production-Coastal Zone-Floodplain) to Q-LUD-4I-CZ--FP2 (Qua►lifi4d Limited Use District Combined with oil Production a.d Drilling-Coastal Zone-TIoodplain) , in the City of Huntington Beacht County of Orange, State of California' and being that portion of the northeast one-quarter:,,, cf the southeast one-quarter of Section 13 , Township ;�,South.. Mange 11 west , S .B .H . &M. , in the Rancho Los, Voleas ,` .an ishown on the map filed ir, Book 51 of Miscellaneous Maps at Page 7 , in the office of the County Recorder of Orainge County, more particularly descr:.bed as follows: Commencing a't the intersection of the centerlines of Hamil' .on Aven�ie and Magnolia Street; Thence a "Lang the centerline of Mag!nnlis Sfteet, South Y I 00040124" vast 131.9 . 49 feet:; Thence leaving said centerline, south 63•'321W west: 1098 . 42 feet to the true point of becLianin w ' �, 2960 Rl 60"R7 wwrz«ww sry11:11. - es _A Ri at - - Rl RI RI C F—R NJ RI SiM2 J. RA RA-0 • M i-A•0 NI-A- Iti LU —7 i �a f e t s a + D—O--CZ R1-C2 ill ' • IIE i!1 Ito C IT W y-C� ,i o �r l-cz all fit r RI +� - s All Rl•CZ ! , RI 1 cF_r G 114 1:1-r u.&., .k R 1-CZ � i a NJ R t- Rl CF—R DA t C2 ZC 67-*,t+ -*4 Ji HUMI iisTOR KACH PLANN94G DIVIR N I` Mm y� 4`� ;; :, ♦ p •Z Thence continuing along said line, anuth 89032 ' 53 " wee`. 94 . 5a feat to a point on the northeasterly line of that certain strip of land described per aocumene recorded in Book 4942• at Page :22 of official records of said county, t' said point being also a point on a curve r concave northeaeterlys and , having a radius of 2317 .40 feet, a radial line to said point bears south 80040 107" west ; Thence nor th�uester�ly along said curve, through a central angle of a8 15 28 , an arc distance of 334 .69 feet to • a point to which ' 4 radial line bears south 88056135" west; Thence leaving acid curve , north 96051118" -east 122 . 36 feet; Thence soul:.h 001-)27 107" east 339 . 00 feet to the point of beginning . Containing .O668 acres, more or less . subject to the following condition3 : a . Fr,ior to the issuance of any permits for grading, building or drilling on the subject . 868 portion of the 38 acre Ascon Fite, characterization fix the entire 38 y acre site ( including access road ) in accordance with j recommendations from -, the City and carer responsible r agencies inch-uding Regional Water Quality Control Board# shall be completed. Depending on the reaultr of the characterization , it shell either be verified by all responsible agencies that the portion of the site to be utilized for drilling purposes is free of contAminanta area drilling activities may safely proceed without remedi.ation of thit subject portion or overall portion of the site , or fte site shall be remediacted to the satisfaction of all responsible agencies prior to issuance of any grading, building or drilling permits . r4r + b, 411 ' storage tanks shall include vapor recovei:y uyst:ems approved by the City Pure Department . pricer to the issuance of drilling permits, fire hydrants ( numbs: and location to be determined by the City Fire Department ) shall be pray*de4 on site . c. The proposed private roadway running from Hamilton Sf Avenue to the drilling site shall be a designated fire lanes minimum 24 foot vide, and constructed in accordance with Public Works standards and criteria . The road shall be of "all weather" mGterial . A study must be completed of roadway area for potential gas i seeps, etc. and rev-iawed by appropriate state agencies prior to issuance of any conditional use permit , d , must suppression and soil erosion mitigatiot•+ measureu such as watering the soils during grading, and tt:e 2 - zgbe M4ht 1 .• i ~y�J ;a ,77 utilization of di.kee , s►andbago , Etc during construction shall be approved by the Director of crMMUnity Development and implemented . i . ACOOGt to the Site shall be taken from Hawilton Av:�nue only . Delivery and pick up routes) shall be limited to those indicated in the proposed plan (see attached rite lrn and rout* map) . Deliveries and pick ups shall be invited 'to the hours between 7 :00' AM and 5 : 00 PM Monde through PriJay and shall be prohibited entirely on Oaturday, Sundatys and holidays , ' f. The projt:ct shall comply with the Ci c;f of f;untingtoa beach oil Code rnd Noise ordinance. S. All safety measures and contingency . plans shall be in conformance with the standards of, and approved by, thf city of Huntington Beach Fire Department . A liability/performance bond shall be reviewed and approved by the planning Commiss.,on prior to any development , h# xf lighting is included with the project , energy efficient lamps shall be used (e .g . high pressure sodium Volpor, metal halide) All outside lighting iiha ll be . directed to prevent "spillage" chto adjacent properties . i . A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer . This analysis shalt include on-site sail sampling and Aaboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading, chemical ard fill properties , foundations, retaining . walls , streets ,, and utilities prior to iesuance of a conditional use; permit . � . Prior to the issuance of a grading permit , a grading plan shall be submit.t d to the City 's Department of Public storks . A plan, for silt control for all water � runoff from the property during construction and during initial operation of the project may be required by the Director of Public Works if deemed necessary* it . No slant-drillings shall be permitted under Edison company property . 1 . 1P during drilling, ha2ar,dous wastes are encountered, drilling operations must immediately cease until the ha$ard Is defined and subsequently mitigated following an approved contingency plan . Should this situation occur. the Department of Health Services must be notified at once. SZCTION 2 : The Director of Community Det,elopment is hereby directed to amend Section 9061 , District Map 14 (Sectional 2968 1 •/ 1 S t YI'J A I 1 I V r 7.1 r District Map 13-6-11 ) to re€lest Zone Change No . 87-14 , described in Section 1 hereof . A copy of said district map, as amended hereby, is available for inspection in the Office of the City Clerk . SECTION 3 : This ordinance still take effect c hirty (34 ) days after ihs adoption, PASS= AND ADOPTED by the city Council of the City of Huntington at a regular meeting thereof held on the 24th day of October , 1988 . Mayo AITTEs r: 3 APPRVDAS TO FOR14 : Vz, City Clerk Ci Y A ,nV 6 - i REVIEWED AND APPROVED. INITIATED AND ArPIROVED: )IL t city Administrator Direct r of Community ' Development ;r be p,. • Z9d8 ..d r t OF .. y •r �M r,p.,w ii' h ti ' y 1 i , 4V Ord. No. 2968 fN..� STaIt OF CAUFMIA CUM OF OMMBE as: MY OF MATINGTON BENCH d , CMC BNOCCi AYe the duly appointed, qualified City 000 th* Oty of Muntingtom Beach and ex-dfftclo Clerk of the g City Council of the said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of anNars of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is sevens that the forogoing ordinance was read to sold City Council at a regular noting thereof held can the 3rd day of odober and was again read to said City Council at a regular 24th October 19 88 � •' r+rtf�eg thereof held on t.�ra day of �, and was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of oil the masbers of said City Council . AYES: Countil webers : Kelly,-Green, Erskine,�Melop Winchel4 o Bannisters Ca mil ers: Finley ANENT: Counci l rs None city CIAC' a ex-O fff C C of than My ty Counc i 1 of the ter of Huntington Beach, California 2968 1 7 I 4 'K P494 2 - CCWnci l /Agenc. inutes 5/2f88 Deal Wad. representing the Historic Resources Board , reminded Councilmen bers of the walking tour scheduled for Saturday, May 6, 1983 to view historic rr Stcruefures in the downtown area . She extended an invitation to the Planning Coeamissicmers to 3oin the tour. i described two alternatives for the Linear Park that she had developed and istributed save to Council . They pertained to alternative boundaries for the Linear Park. HoLfbil- JS cbg1 as 9 Al xys_on Di ck&y and M F i shbeck addressed Counci l and spoke in apposi#lon to redeveiopmert of the downtown trek. Caarl 8JYWwd, Merchant on Main Street and a member of the Project Area Commit- tee, announced that "Clean Up Day" was being held in a portion of the downtown Area. The Mayor suggested that Mr. Hayward contact staff for assistance ill posting of the property. Councilman Mays suggested that Mr. Hayward request the Pub- lic Information Officer to announce the Clean Up Day on cable television, n DaXg F'ranets opposed redevelopmvnt in the downtown area . 4Qan albria t described an attempted purse snitching from Mrs . Albright , thanked the Police department for- the' r assistance and commended the hel i cop-• for program in assisting in apprehending the suspect. r IbJnCgg Sbi1don, representing Maui Petrol evw, reviewed the need and benefits of, consolidation of oil wells in the downtown area. He stated that Angus Petroleum wnuld be filing application pa�»rs again and requested Council approval of same. Discussion was held between Councilman Bannister and Mr. Sheldon regarding the cost of abandonment of oil wells . Job, seNn and - Li.ga Mo�seman addressed Council ana stated their oppcsi tiun to the r� �� ,�♦r hey-to requested that Council consider an old time theme for the park- nq• structure proposed for 'third Street and Walnut Avenue to complement pre- sent architecture across the street. He commented on a staff memorandum he ` heard rumors about pertaining to prohibiting single family residences being . iIt in certain areas of the Downtown- Specific Plan . He stated he believed that tingle- family hones were an asset to the community and should be encour- sed. hairt klid requested that a stop sign be installed at the intersection of Ods Street and Garfield Avenue. He described difficulties encountered by e6io� citizens trying to cross the street. Councilman Kelly requested staff to review traffic concerns at that location pertaining to citizens of age and infirmity. Les Evans , Acting Director of Public Works , presented a verbal report regardi ,iq the intersection. CQU - ElUgtson addressed Council and stated his opposition to the proposed change of zoning in District 4 from R-1 to R-2. a w r •'row e r'41. f Pace 13 Council/Ageocy Minutes - 512/88 Mayor Erskine called a Closed Session of Council pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) to confer with the attorney regarding per-di ng litigation which has been initiated formally and to which the City is a party. The title of the litigation is Concerned Citizens of Huntington Beach vs City of Hunt- ington Bench' Angus petroleum, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 538174. EKE The Ma war Galled a racesf of Council at 11 :30 p.m. the meeting was reconvened r. w W ' s �D CIIJUAS Y. CIIX i H INTIN ilal -BEAUI UDAMMO.= Mayor Erskine announced that during Close Session of Council a settlement agreement had been reached concerning Orange County SUperior Court Case No, 538174 Concerned Citizens of Huntington Beach vs City of Huntington Beach and Angus petroleum. AD3 EXT LL EYELQPMENT-AGENCY The Mayor/Chairman adjourned the regular meeting of the City Council and the regular meeting of the Redevelopment Agancy of the City of , Huntington Beach to 9:45 a.m. , Saturday, May 7 , 1988 in the east parking l a"I oitsi de of the Ci vi c Center. Clerk 0 the Redevelopment Agency and City Clark and ex-off 1 cio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California ATTEST: ' BY Deputy Cit larK40ev y Clerk A i c ia 14& .N@otXorttL >. City C1 erk/Ci erk yor/Chad rman ' deputy City Clerk/Deputy lerk 1Tl,I a . y . r i ! r Page 6 - Council /Agency Minutes 2/16/88 w I The Deputy City Clerk presented a communication from Doug LaBelle, Deputy City Administrator/Community development, transmitting a recommended program of financial incentives for owners of buildings subject to the seismic safety ordinance , in the Malin-Pier Redevelopment Project Area. Mr. LaBelle presented a staff report. Discussion wits f.ald regarding funding sources, whether the recommended action was considered an interim solution to redevelopment of the area, and the design guidelines for the area . Ccuntilwoma►n Winchell suggested that a buy back release be included in the program so that in the event the city wished to Acquire the property the city would not have to pay an increased price for property that increased in value due to improvements made with money provided by the city. Mr. LaBelle stated that a formula to prevent this could be added to the agreement . Following discussion , Mr. LaBelle was requested to review how Main Street USA would fit into the design guidelines•. Discussion was held r$garding how loan program and grants work together to encourage property owners to make seismic and facade improvements to their property. Mr. LaBelle stated that after consulting with other cities the formula which seemed to Mork was to help property owners find funding for seismic improvements , owners pay for health improvements out of their own funds and the facade Improvements be paid for with grant monies . 'A motion was mada by Erskine, seconded by Kelly, to approve a program of financial incentives for owners of buildings subject to the seismic safety ordinance, with no, 4 modified, in the Main-Pier Redeveopment Project Area, as follows : 1 . Authorize staff to commence participation in the Federal 312 Loan Program and to assist property owners in the preparation of construction cost estimates , appraisals , and loam application documents for improvements required by the Seimic Ordinance. 7. 'Authorize staff to secure , facade easements from property owners in exchange for a facade improvement grant not-to-exceed $15,625 for 25 foot lots, and $31 , 250 for 50 foot lots (except corner rots) with a priority for participation for owners of properties in the block bounded by Main, Olive, Fifth, and Walnut. 3. Reprogram $450,000 from the current CDBG residential rehabilitation pro- gram and 400,,t from the "Relocation" account of the CDSG Program to use in the facade grunt program. 4. Require as a condition of participation in the facade grant program that property owners cooperate in the formation of a uniform facade treatment consistent with the Downtown Design Guidelines and/or the Historic Reha- bilitation Guidelines published by the U. S. Department of housing and Urban Development as appropriate for each property and that the plans for the facade treatment be submitted to the Design Reviev Board for approval prior to implementation. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: t Page 5 - Council /Agency Minutes - 2/ . �188 SOU. U.- FINAL :BRACT ME.- 13061 - APPRQM ALL aF_Tr..1.1 $ Y KINDALLATAL -,=.20 8iEN 91H & MH STREETS The Deputy City Clerk presented a communication from the deputy City . Admini- i strator/Community Development regarding Final Tract Map 15487, Following discussion, a motion was made by Erskine , seconded by Kelly, to approve Final Tract Map 13087 , being all of Tentative Tract 13087 , pursuant to the mandatory findings set forth in Section 66458 and Section 66474 of the Government Code; accept offer of dedication and improvement subject to comple- tio of requirements stipulated , on property located on the north side of �. Pacific Coast Highway between Ninth and Tents, Streets ; examined and certified by the Director of Public Works and the Secretary to the Planning Commission as being Substantially in accordance with the tentative map as filed with, amended and Approved by the Planning Commission . Acreage: .855 acres net; Lots ; 1 , Developers; S. Y. Kimball , Et a1 , Huntington Beach; adopted map sub- Ject to stipulations as follows : Deposit of flees for wetter, sewer, drainage, engineering and inspections ; Certificate of Insurance; Subdivision Agreement; the Park and Recreation flees shall be paid or a surety posted in an amount equal to the in-lieu fees and approved as to form by the City Attorney prior to recordation of the final map. Drainage for the subdivision shall be approved by the Department of Public Works prior to the recordation of the 'C final map; the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Community Development and approved as to form by then City Attorney prior to recordation' of the final map; and further accepted lgonument Bond, No. 1145784, Faithful Performance Bond No. 1144257, Labor and Material Bond No. 1144257 and approved and authorized exe- cution of the Subdivision Agreement and further instructed the • City Clerk that she shall not affix her signature to' the map nor release such reap for prelimi- nar processing by the County or for recordation until the aforementioned con- ditions have been met, (JEa�, .. STAFF -19 wADDRESS the Deputy City Clark presented a communication from the Deputy City Admi ni- s trato►rJ ommunl ty Development regarding[ the ,Angus Petroleum Project Conditions of ApproW reWd'i ng noise attenuation. The Angus Petroleum Project location Is two blacks bounded. by Delaware Street to the east, Huntington Street to the nest, Taroato Avenge to the north and Rochester Avenue to the south . The City Administrator requested that the item be continued. On motion by Kelly, , second Winchell , Council continued the Angus petroleum Project Conditions of Approval regarding noise attenuation by the following rol) call vote: AYES : Kelly, Green, Finley, Erskine, Mays , Alinchell ODES: None ASSENT: bannister The Mayor requested than staff address citizens concerns , as expressed during the public comments portion of the meeting, regarding parking and noise viola- tions at the protect goo ` w • t k •r Page 7 Council /Agerocy Vinutes AYES: KWY2 Green , Finlay, Erskine, Mays , Wi nche i l IDS: Nona ABSENT: Bannister The DoWt City Clerk presented a coataunication from the City Administrator tralhI INjo a report on the Downtown Action Plan Compliance Progrilm and sug- 1eeting pfttedurss i.h which the overall program may be further expanded. Nr., I00-s e, Deputy City Administrator/Community Development, presented a staff report. Discussion was held between Council and the City Attorney regarding ordering tenants to vacate property considered seismically unsafe. A motion was made by Finley, seconded by Erskine, to take the following actions: 1 . Confirm that the City Attorneyy' s office is authorized to fi 1 e complaints with the Orange County Superior Court for injunctivk relief against the owners of certain properties located on Main Street, 5th Street, Walnut Avenue, PCH, and 3rd Street for fallu're to comply with the Earthquake Hazard Ordinance. 2. Direct the Downtown Task Farce to continue its efforts and provide a' pro- rots report for City Council consideration and action as appropriate in d days ; 3. Dlrsct staff to prepare An Urgency Ordinance requiring that a,, new con- struction, or more than 517E reconstruction , each indlvidua; unit in hotelso motels , 11od in boardin houses and siMilar occupancies be pro- vided with bathroola king facifitits and to require that each unit con- tain minimum square footage of living area as provided in thw uniform city-vido standards. the Motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYE :, 611y, Greene Finley, Erskine, Mays , winchell llM: None I•l SENT: Bannister LIN cmI1'YQK rT The Deputy,City Clerk presented a coamnication from the Department of Pubic Norks stating that prior to completi lig negot]ati ons for Pi erside Village a Mal decision, by Council 1: necess&ry on the issue of relocating lifeguard heNdquarf�ers. In response to Council i n ui ry the City Administrator . s ta'ted that plans were to pl ate a restaurant sim� 1 ar to thin Chart House on the site now occupied by the 11figuArd headquarters. n �ry� Ile !k 1 fL 4, 1 Page 8 - Council/Agency Minutes - 2/16/88 A motion was made by Mays , seconded by Erskine , to relocate lifeguard head- quarters on the condition that it be replaced by a strong anchor tenant for Pierside Village such as a major restaurant. The nation carried by the fol- lowing roll call rote: AYES: Kelly, Green, Erskine, Mays NOES: Finley, Winched ABSENT: Bannister INI% alMl TO HEAR IS Al Irn •w - w w w up „ PPRM The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing to consider appeals filed ` by the City.-Ca ,1 Qf the City lad hastmi aster and the HMR Ptuartiy fi t. Inc. . "UntngtgIR Suacb to the Planning Commis- sion' s approval of Conditional Use Permit 87-44/Conditidna►l Exception 87-95/ Tentative Parcel Map 87-424/Environmental impact Report 87-4. The proposal is to develop mixed use office complex or 18.42 acres of land. Project includes one 12 story building, one 8 story building, two restaurant padsi an ancillary commercial/retail use building, a parking structure and at grade parking. The subject property is located at the northeast corner of Bois& Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street. j Environmental Impact Report tl '. 87-4 analyzes tho: potential impacts of the project mad identifies appropriate mitigation measures . The Deputy City Clerk announced that all legal requirements for notification, publication and posting had been met, and that she had received a letter from the Huntington Beach Environmental Board dated February 15 , 1988. She stated that a letter dated February 1 , 1988 had been received from the City of West- minstor. Catherine O'Hara , Assistant Planner, presented a staff report. Mike Adams , Planning Director, informed Council they had been provided with copies of a handout outlining alternate language for one of the conditions of approval . Councilman Mays stated that he had been an employee of McDonnell Douglas for the past ton .years and therefore he would not participate in discussion or vote on the issue because of a possible conflict of interest . unCi ima,n Mays vacated h!f s plaCe it the Cagh. JJ_tab 1 _and i 1 e# rho room. The Mayor declared the hearing open . Charles Stith, Mayor Pro Tom of the City of Westminster, appearing on behalf of the City Council of the City of Westminster, stated that the City of Wes t- mihster does not object to the proposed project and that its appeal of the Planning Commission' s approval of this project is based on the belief that the $3�5,000 proposed traffic improvement in the City of Westminster would not be adequate to effectively mitigate the adverse traffic impact of the project. Ne proposed that a joint committee composed of City cour.cilmembers and staff from troth ci ti:is be appointed by each City Council to study future needs of � street and intersections which will be impacted by the project and future develupment that will occur in both cities and to identify all potential fund- I.. R.Ti h 4+ �Yr• . fi i Fail tS - Counei 1 /Agency Mi notes Zt l b/88 W,f„_CMfid I I-.WW OF PNMEQ GROINa4s Eusimm) fiQ DUCIL r Councilmen Kinthell commended the Community Services Director can the appear- 469e of proposed ordinance presented for Council consideration . She PNques:ted 1h4t all future ordinances be prepared in the same manner, with ' I nded portions included but a diagonal bar struck across each letter in the ' $action: deleted' ar aunded. r The t#a or/Chairman adjourned the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach to Friday, February 19, 1988 at Ben Brown' s Aliso Crook Iran - Laguna Beach - (Council /Staff Retreat) ; and adjourned the regular mWing of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach to b p .m. , Monday, February 22, 1988 in Room 0-8 , Civic Center . Clerk of the Redevelopment Agency and City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of ATTEST: Huntington Beach, California Deputy Ci er e y 471erk Alicia N. Nan 2rth OP ity Clerk/C ork Mayor/Chairman V. rJ9LW.As.&%A (�&"J" C--�/ I PUPONO�19 I , MQ epu y City eek/Deputy Cle k n I I I,IS W Page 2 - Council /Agency Minutes 5/2/88 24-154-15 304 Coast Highway Gwendolyn Tubach 24-154-16 302 Ocean Avenue Gwendolyn Tubach 24-166-=1 129 Second Street Randall Foods , Inc . V-166-2 121 Second Street WWII Foods , inc . 24-166. 3 Situs Pending Randall Foods , Inc . 24-166--4 Situs Pending Randall Foods , Inc . 24-166-5 Situs Pending Randall Foods , Inc . 24-166 -6 Situs Pending Randall Foods , Inc. 14-116-7 211 Walnut Avenue Helen T. Madzoeff 144.1 4- 8 124 Third Street Randall Foods, Inc. 14-166--9 122 Thi rod Street Randall Foods, Inc . 14-166-10 118 Third Street Randal ! Foods , Inc . Z4.166-11 100 Third Street Gwendolyn Tubach 24-166-12 100 Th; rd Street ;Also) Gwendolyn Tubach 24-181-14 200 Hartford Avenue John L. Wickman 24-181-15 222 Iidianapolis Avenue Vernon H. Hudgeons RECESS.—.REgM The Mayor called a recess of Council at 5:30 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 6:50 p.m. (City 1 SESSION -.. .HEFT FER - WZEDEUMS AS=6T10#1 ' The Mayor called ' an Clatted Session of Council to meet with its designated representatives regardlni# labor relations matters pursuant to Government Code Section 64957.6- (Huntington 84each Poll ice - Officers Association and Firemen' s Association. RKESS -AWNE The 'Mayor called a recess of Council at 5: 30 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 6: 50 p.m. IBM BEQ V. cUY OF,HUNIINGTt �� Motto The Myc ca,114d an Closed Session of rounci i to order pursuant to Government Code Sec Ain 54996,9(a) to confer . vith its attorney regarding pending iitiga. tion wh! — has boon irvitlated formally and to which the City is a.' part,. The title of 6he litigation is Concerned Citizens of Huntington Beach v. City of Huntington leach, Angus Petroleum, Orange runty Superior Court Case No. 538174. REGMS The Mayor called a recess of Council at 5: 30 p.m. The meeting was reconjened at 6:50 P.M. .r slob r TA L Wage 4 Council /Agency Minutes 5!2188 Discussion was held regarding staff' s recommaendaOon to real i yii Talbert Avenue to connect with Edwards Street ; dedication of property to the Linear park. by various property owners , particularly Signal Landmark; and regarOnn park boundaries . It was the consensus a: Council/Agency to -continue • the joint study session, with the planning Commission to 5:30 p.m. , Tuesday, May 179 1988. 0i - imaURM"UMNT AGE u ' '1 ha Ni'or/Chair. •n adjourned the regular meeting of the City Council and the k regular meeting of the Redeveiopment Agency of the City of huntington Beach. 3� Clerk of �c h M.Fted vel oa,en#�Aaenc p t Y y and City Clerk and ey-offjcio C1erK of the City Council of the City of Huntington beach , California d ATTEST: 4Z&4A�1�, .9puty Ci t Crk y erk/l u ity Clerk/Clark M or/Chairmao Deputy City Clerk/Deput lerk i, i i I // I } Jo ,� NOTICE TO: THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM: THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK THE AP LISPS FROM THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR NOTIFICATION. MAILINGS BY THE CITY CLERK MUST BE THE LATEST 6VAILABLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH DIVISION �- ► REQUIREMENTS, i ***PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE LIST MAY HAVE CHANGED SINCE THE MAILING FOR THE PLANNING COW41SSION MEETING WAS SENT. DATE S I uFl LIR� W.TrYING U 1Ts7 - �7 a7, i f I • 1 'M • s i� "A • GUARANTEE Liability $3.00• p0 Order No. _--� Fee S 75. 00 Your Ref. 500' Variance, FIRST AMERICAN TITLES INSURANCE COKPANY a Corporation, herein called the Company, GUARANTEES City of Huntington Beach r I � herein caller! the Assured , against actual loss not exceeding the liability amount stated above which the Assured shall sustain by reason of any incorrectneas in the assurances set fcrth in Schedule A. LIABILITY EXCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS 1. No guarantee is given nor liability assumed with respect to the identity of any party named or referred to in Schedule A or with respect to the validity, legal effect: or priority of any matter shown therein. 1. The Company' s liability hereunder shall by limited to the amount of accuel logs $urtained by the Assured because of reliance upon the assurance herein set forth, but in no event shall thz Company' s liability exceed the liability amount set forth above. Dated: 5eptembe+ 19, 1988 i I FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSUWCE COMIANY j ra=ldy Assistant Vice president DIrecto r of Special Secvicts � I First American Title Insr -,actts Co. S. Fifth street Santa An&$ CA 92702 Y 1 IY • 1 SCHEDULE A PROPER17 OWNER'S N0110E GUARANTEE 1. Thnt , according to the last equalized "Assessment Roll" in the Office of the Orange County Tax Assessor - a. The persons listed as' "Asseshed Owner" are shnwr. on the assessment roll as owning real property within 500 feet of the property identified on the assessment roll as Arsessor' s parcel Number 25_ Oft3--XX , 25-086•-M b. The Assessor' s Parcel Number and any addresses shown on the assessment roll ara attached hereto. 2. That, according co, the Company 's property records , (but without examination of those Company records maintained or indexed by name) , there have been no documents recorded subsequent to April., 1988 purporting to transfer title to any of the properties listed. I � 1 i r' f�6 ,. 4 ,Ahtish Nt-)v . 10 , 19 7_ g 4 H 'ARINQ _.. Appeal to Planning Commissi.or ' s Approval of Zone Change No . 88--11/11se Permit No . 88-25/ Supplemental Environmental. Impact Report No . 88-1 and Environmental Impact Report 86--1 ( Springfield Oil Recovery Project) NOTICE IS HEREBY G.CVFN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Flu'ntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 id3in Street , Huntington Beach, California , on the date and at the time indicated below Lo receyve and consider Ue statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application describd below . p, Monday , November 21 , 1988 7 : 0 0 PM j@JEC'r: Appeal. to Planning Commission' s Approval. of Zone Change No . 88-11/Use Permit No . 88-25/Supplemental Environmental Impact Deport No . 88--1 and Environmental Impact Report No . 86-1. L�Lr Angus petroleum Corporation APPELLANTS: 1 . Councilwoman Grace Winchell 2 . Concerned Citizens For Huntington Deach � LO TIO: The project site consists of two blocks located on � opposite corners as follows (See attached map) : JLLQek_.A (Tragl__12 7 4 7 : bounded by Springfield Avenue, Delaware Street , Rochester Avenues and California Street ; Prld $"sk a (Tr1Act 12.74_6) : bounded by 'Toront-o Avenue , California Street , Springfield Avenue and Huntington Street . Zone. Chaff : Rezone Block A (Tract 12747) from "Oldtown Specific Plan-District Two-ail Fa4ilities (OT-2--0) " to "Oldtown Specific Plan-r'istr,ict Two-Oil Facilities with Oil, Drilling (OT-2-01) " to allow the drilling of new oil wells . i ;. Use Perms : To develop an oil consolidation � r` drillsite on Block A and associated oil facility on Block E . Also requested is a redaction of exte_ ior sideyard oethacks frown ten (10) feel: to a minimum seven ( 7) feet Ear the north and south elevations of both blocks . ( 1150d-13 ) 1, } rrrr w• ti I NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING (CONT . ) On October 18 , 1-986 the Planning Commission approver] and recommended adoption of Zone Change No . 88-11 , approved Use Permit No . 88-25 and approved and recommended certification of Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No . 88-1 and Environmental Impact Report No . 86•-1 with a Statement of Overriding Considerations - guy 190MUNTA gTAMM: The City Council is required- to certify as adequate Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No . 88- 1 and recertify Environmental 'Impact Report No . 86•-1 with a Statement of Overriding Considerations prior to any action an Zone Change No . 88--11 and Use Permit No . 88-25 . A c oy of the roposed request is on file in tt:r! Dep.irtment of Community Development , 2000 Main -S reet , Huntington Beach , r8lifornia 92648 , for inspection by the public . ALL LNTERES'A'�.D PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express oai»ions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. All applications , exhibits , and descriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Fain Street . Huntington Beach California , ! public; , 1 oinia , for inspection by the HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL By: Connie Brockway City Clerk Phone ( 714 ) 52E-5227 Dated Nov. 8, 1988 ( 1150d-•14) low CF c �R2 a �� _• - CIF-E-CD �-•: -1 >:z-a-ca RA o -CD- -CD-0 -� cF-E-ca �4 a a R2-0 R2 RZ o ; `tea -C:3-Q co-o S R4 AdF- Iw. -o o -� .a ` fR2-o Rr.-o 1 • I CF-R RI RI R! RI R? -CO-0 •o R- = o a o 0 N N O a t Q ! r = RI RI Rf RI Rt R1-0 '� RI Rl ill ■1 RI II C -0 _C2 �n..r .u•M. 1 i -O -O -M••-w " loarWO =/ 1 c RI I RI NJ Ai R -O •�• -� CF-E oil y t!i • I !•t-�•0 ..- IT u��e. +*-wee.+ AE 111 ill �. �0 � .� ;;'4-■D-�o ��•;� X r i 1 �� J. _ Pl-AN( R CT zccpup 1/U P813-,b-ZS/E I R 138--w--t A HURTINGTON MACH PLANNING DFVrStOH 1 ` 1 I f 1 I SPRINGFIELD AREA. OIL HEC(xV ER'.; PROJECT NOTICE OF PREPKRATTON SCUPING COMMENTS INTRODUCTION This document provides review and camiuent on the Novice of Preparation and Initial Study issued by the City of Huntington Beach for the Draft Supplemental Envi. eonment;l Impact Report for the proposed Springfield Area ail Recovery Project . While we agree with the city' s position that a supplenenIzal tIR J. s required , wa hove concerns thr.t the attached initial Study does not identify all potential significant impacts . Additionally, we have provided direction as to the scope of issues that are required to be addressed in detail . It should be noted that this review should be considered preliminary in nature , and that additional concerns could surface during review of the Draft Supplemental 91R. This review is divided into three sections . The first section identifies additional items on the environmental checklist that may bu significant and should be addressed in the EIR . The second section provides a discussion of the General topics that should be addressed in the EIR and Section 3 addresses some of the specific issues that were not adequately addressed in the pvbvioua SIR prepared for the proposed project . I I G r r. 4 , I ' I SECTION 1 -- INITIAL STUDY COMMENTS We have the following comments on the environmenl• al checklist issued as a portion of the Initial Study . Reference is made to the specific items on that checklist . Item I . & . relates to potential changes in geologic substructures . a .ec ocding operations for oil recovery projects say impact such substructures and should be addressed . Item 1 . c . refers to changes to the ground surface . Clearing and levellng of the drilling and production sites will change the round surface . Additionally there is a potential for subsidence rom drillin§ activjties . Therafo.e this item should be changed to the "maybe" column . Item 1 +e . This should be checked in the "maybe " column because ere) =s" a potential • that oil spills or other releases of toxic materials could reach the ocean or other drainages via storm drains, street gutters or sanitary sewers . item l .h . If city water is used for a portion of the wakes fldddinF project , there may be an impact on the amount of &vsilab„e washer for the City, especially in light of the current drought . Item Cat. and items 5 . a . fail spills and release of other toxic roe er a e may ipact plant and animal species in the coastal areas of the City. Iteem 10 1 . There will be a potential for fire and explosion ; thia Wourd be placed in the "yes" column rather than thi "maybe" � column . Item 14 . c , refers to the potential for increased governmental sere ce$ In the area of schools . As discussed more fully in Section 2 ( cumulative impacts ) below, the "freeing up" for future development of land currently encumbered by oil and gas facilities could potentially impact school facilities due to future population increases . Item 21 . We bslieve that all four mandatory findings of 519nifcarnee should be checked "yes " since both the project appeoific and cumulative effects of the proposed project would be eignificarnt . • r ' r •,r "''15w" lAf'a+...c,•..., ., .._. _-._ ..___.`_,_��_�J..�.e.ill i SECTION 2 REQUIRED TOPXCS TO BE ADDRESSED The draft EIR that was previously prepared for this prod . ct dirt not adequately address several important CEQA. required topics . one of the primary ahortcomings of the previous doc!iment: was Its cursory discussion of Alternatives . At a minimum , the 5EIR should include in the Alternatives Analysis : o Alternative methods of recovery of the oil and gas resources , including use and/or expansion of f!xistinrj faMi. lities . o Use of alternative drillsites and production sites , '. ncludi,ng a larger number •cif smaller Kizer sites , and the relecation of the production site to an area already dedicated to oil production purposes , e . g . , Shell ' s facility or Chevron ' s facility. o The potential of reworking existing wells for use as injector,i/now producers , with production and gathering lines routed to an existing production area . o Alternative uses of the proposed project sites . The previous ICIR was lacking in its discussion of the cumulative Impacts of the proposed project. An analysis of cumulative impacts should include : o Existing ail and gas operations in Huntington Beach , and the geratoral future plans for a time period equal to the life of is project . Th;s should include independent operators and major producers . o Passible development acenari.os for the lands " freed-up" from the encumberance of surface oil and gas facilities . Such an ara►lysix should address the entire scope of impacts resulting from ultimate development of all such lands , based not only on current zoning but also on the worst-case ( i . e . , most Intensive') , future development scenarios . Issues of primary concern would be traffic, ppublic servic 's and utilities , air quality: population and socic:economics . The previous Rift was also lacking in the details of the proposed pro!v..- to in particu,\ar , inform4.-tion reg%rding oil trarnsporta`tion, waste dispos.nl and wafter ' requirements were not provided in sufficient detail . J 1 i1 • 3 y . awl I +r '4 OWNi SECTION 3 w PROJECT SPECIFIC IMPS CTS I I Project specific: impacts that should be fully addrE.s3ed inc.1udC but are not limited to the following: o Geological impacts , i►,ieluding potential. subsidence or uplift due to waterfloodinq operations ; induced seismiciLyl and systems safety concerns vis-a-vis repressuricat&on of the oil bearing formation resulting in migration of gas from abandoned wells . o hydrological impacts , both for normal site rl;noff and potential oil spill impacr. areas due to pipelirie/'tank/berm failure . This analysis should include a description of where oil would flow if a tank were ruptured and the retLi.ning dykes did not hold as well as providing an oil pill contingency plan . o Air quality impacts for the construction , drilling and opera- tional phases of the project should be calculated . Addition- ally, the impacts of toxic emisoions such as benzene from the crude oil should be caloulated according to ARB guidelines . o Lind Use �ins acts specifically in regard to compatibility with p City-approved land uses and co ar compatibility with existing MRs , should be Addressed iri detail , 0 Transportation impacts , for surface impacts phase-by-phase and cumulative , and for tctnsportation of produced oil , whether by truck or pipeline need to be addressed in detail . if by pipeline , include such factors as size , age ( if existing ) , router , current use, potential rupture Impact area , and destination . o A dert:ailud systems safety. analysis should be provided for all phases of the proposed project . This analysis should include , as a minimum, hazard footprints from storage tanks and well sites for fire ( radiant heat ) , explosior , and release of toxic gas . An oil spill contingency plen , safety plan and a security plan should also be provided for review in the Draft RXR. o A full visual impact analysis should be providod for the proposed project including attiet' s renderings and site profiles * 4 �bA �y • 1 cr In addition to a full noise aro.Atlye c , a dete.iled vihrati.or, arnalyysis associated with the dr1.1.1.1ng p� %% ;r.,e should he provided . This study Oiuuld include the range and degree of impact to area residences as well as the potential to damage structures ( e . y . cracked piaster and cement , etc . ) . u Public services impacts , including fire , police , stor drain system and sanitary sewer system. ,A full an&Iysia of the puh;Li, -: service impacts associated with the proposed project should be provided with special emphasis on the capabilities of the fire department to control k fire in close proximity to residences . o Water supply system impacts . A full impact analysis of water use for each phase of the proposed project should be provided . In particular , the use of domestic water fo'r water flooding should be addressed . c Impacts to rr$stewactur treatment, systems , including the disposal of brines . i A full analysis of the wastes produced , proposed disposal methods and treatment requirements should be provided in the SIR. r 5 it♦ � . �1 ENCLUSURN ( 3 ) I • DRAFT - SUPPLEMENTAL B. I .P. NO. 85--1 PROA D.'EPAPTMENT OF COV14UNITY DEV9LOPMENT i i 1 i'• l` 4 a M r , i City of H untin tic B e,,,,-i c. h 200" MAiM S I'R( ET ..��.r....cwtirr.w.c.v...,.-....rVf G a.v.�.r�ara..r..w .�.�.+r.M'....... ..a•✓n.�ya@..,+.n ' . r Z.L.I FORM A. 026413 JJ VEFARI MENI Of' i Building Division 536.6241 � Housingthodovalopment Division 536-SH ; Planning 01vislun 636.5271 June 1 , ).981 Concerneo C ltixens fo►• Huntington Beach j 225 SanLA Monica Boulevard Suite 4Q Santa Monica, CA, 90401 SUBJECT: NonCE 017- PREPARAVON CP DRAFT SUPPLEMENTAL EN"!IkONM.ENTAL ::Hr`4CT REP-DRT NO. 53-1 Tbo City of Huntington 13cach will be the ie;zd agency ;n preparing a Supplemental Environmental !rnpact Report fur Angus Petroleum Curporadon's pr•ioposed Springfield Area OU Recovery project. We need to k+row tho views of responsible 28e:nries as to ihr scope and contem of the onvircnmenial i;format.ion %%-tslch Is gertnzne to the a3e -,cit:;' statutory responsibilities fr. conaection with the proposed project. These": age nciei _" need to use the Supplemental En%,Ironmen al Impact Report (SEIR) and jj0,,vioua!J, prepared SIR when considering permits or other approvals for the project, In addition to ' the i'iews of responsibieb agencies, the Clty Is S,011citing the views ofconcerned citizens, orga;l%rtioni and Interested agencies as tc. -nfrurmation which should be included in the supplenient tc the pr.eiv;ously prepared EIk. The project description, lication and votential ebrvironmental impact:P: are contained in the attached materials. Due to the time iimitp mandated•by State i;w, your response must be sent at the earliest passable date, but not later than 39 s1-tys after ,-eceipt of this notice. P'lel~a>tid send ,our re;epo:�s ; to the attention of Catherine O'Hara at the address noted move, 910n3 with tL e *brne Of a contact person ;n your agency or, organization. Since, iy, Aaaistunt Planner 336•-5271 A t tachmeenl t (a699d) k10 f 1;?!`'.' f :; .it'�i 1�';i'�i'1_'.1�I, f'!.f l:,'�:.J,.E :.;'.1' 1'C!i?f•l f �:��'(I:,;;.Li!i�; (�:•' ►•:i!'! is<<fl;!'IJ�i�'.�'.!'1'_ `•`.II�LI�,?1'.['_[:�IV I I IJ f i i p � 1 a _ art Rd' 1 i 4• A'f E.Hr,I?C I FORNI of PrCpk�xterr 1 ,Ar'qu =..M.F' r 14r c: I rur;Y C rSnj:3arj y c:i IuMber of Prop)t,ent 14067 U eri'v a r• aY 6ui Cje i , CC ( Qr'arlu 604r, 1 Cc,,,, c-3[.brnirted Anr^ i I 4 , 1966 '�. A c: irir� 1. r�:'�tli_;; (: i t Y Lf F1Crn t r.CCh r. None of Prcprsr;I. i' rpt) jiC.;ble =:p. r• irig e- Id Art"Z, t7 . ! RC•covc-r•r Project I i C nd "MLIYbet► anvoy``rs Or'._` rt—tiired on artccti:p,.ta c%-ow'$.) Y es ;.' CY 't: h l.ct prcpo.,cl rc.sulr in; �. !..•'rt.sf::i'(c e:-.r;l'r c�hdl�lt'i1g or in r:41C.rC:e� �.. ISdr_17fii^.Sr �'ri':1(r.,:.'n'1iCti«i �:7f-- t• • Or OWr.rcxvtr,r,,y of the ;,');I ? X = c. C hcrti-9.2 in tcpr),.;;coh;, (If qrovnd sue` e The dr_s`ir[�.ticr,, caveririg or mcdification cf nnr . r;nir�[:r 9e%_)I09ie Or PhrrsiCUl features:' X e, AriY irt:rense in wirsd or water er03it 1 of sails, either cx) cr o 't the site x f. Ch"es it) dl—Positiart or erasiw of beach swds, or chcnges in iiltcticn, deposition or r erosion which maw, modify the chcnnel of a river or stream cw the be�j of ;he ocean or any bay, inlet or Ieke? X y y i 1�l I Y �;. EXP(IlUrt :uf pjo4op1,e cr tart-pert, tc� g e.0tom.. gic. hear arils st.". ct: rc�r tt -iuc;J<es, lan�sii�.'e:, rnuc!:sli 'rs, t7raund frail�.�rr. n; ,, 3 i r'i�i 1 d t' �_. cT G'S. �( i �. ir. 'N:11 tFtir: re:,ulf in. 4 a. 5ub.00ntiO1 air emissic:ns oc deteri3rrtion of OrWent .alit• qualit j? x 7•��r c--rt�ati�x� c�` pt�jr::tiLyid�le Cxjors? `t c. A, I terat inn of air movernent, r;10 is tore, cr temperature, cir cr),, ch©rge in climi,jte, either locnll,, or regianatly? x F 3. ',•Yatrr. 'Hill the p;oposal r:•sult in: a. CrQng es in Carr-n t s, or the -course of di- i recticn of water mav��-Went;, in either rr,%-dr ir,e or f ret j h vdrj t_rs? x U. Changes in c.b sc,ra t i;tl ra tes, dra I nCc Qct- , N!N-Lu of the rc:;c cnd cirrr.)unt of surfcx:e ►. rut o f f? c. Alteration; to .,he course or f!OW of rlaad wo;ers? d. C'hcrge in t'�e an,o;,rnt of surface watr.r n any •Hater bMAY? x e. C�i.g,ncrge into SurfcCe waters, cr in any v(terati��n of surface water gvu .lity, ' r.luding Gut not limited to tcrrlaerature, dissclve:d oxygen cr tur'lbidi'y? X f+ Alteration of the -Iir&_ticn ar rate of flow of ground w;tters? g. Chcr;e in the quantity of ground waters either thfOugh t,'ireat additions Car w i th- drawclt, or through interception of all �'• aquifer Gy cuts or excavations I x h. Substontiol reduction in the Ornount of water otherwise availably for public water .� supplies? x i. Exposure of people cr property to water re- lated haaerd, such as flooding or tidal waves? x .y 310 IL 5J Yes Maybe k. P'C)nt '.i(a, '�.'ifl rl ��rt !%ra! r�'►.rlt it in ri,rrbe. of sty sppm:i(�s of plc)nt. !inr: lodinq t�e`'�� . '�rfr.�i► �, t�r'�.SS, ��i:�75r C;r•,•:I c�(��►i7itl� ��i ►tx) ;' X II b. fgr^c'u<tiOn of the rurrhers of �lnigrjt%, rare ar 3Greie_1 c)f pfonts ? ..,....�. X C. Introduction of ,trrcies LI f pIcri tx into csr+�a. �r in harrier to t•`'e nnrrn(7i r iertish ;lertt of e;xi3rirg sp(!r.iex X d. Rcdt,K:tirY) in Ccreol;a of rj►y cz;rieLrlturni _-- crop? X Anirml Life, 'Nill the proposcil result in; � t 1. Lhullge in the diversity of sprCies, numbers of any SPt-Cies :-)f cnimcls (birL!s, land onimats including re,�tilea., fizt•� c��d shellfish, benthic crcjm.i5rr,5 or. inserts)'' X b. R+°-'�tiern of the numbers of cw:ny .are or endcr,Gered spccirs of mimals? X C. lntro&cricr; of ne,,y sperirs of mirnals into are orec, or result it) a bcrrier �a the migratior, :r movesre:It of cnimca(s' X d. Deter'ioration tO existing fs5h Or Afiidlise � ,,C6itot? X 6, Nci3e_ Will the wror�ascl ren:11 ire; C. Increases in existir.y raise levels? X h, Exposure of people to Severe noise leyf. ls? X. 7. - Light wd Glarp:. Will the Proposal produce � nsw ligh" or glare' X $. Land We. Will the propQsol result in a sub- swntial c1teration of the present or plonned 104 use of an area:' x �. tw Oturol Resources, 'Hill the• propose 1 r'esu I t in: Incr0034 in the rote of u3e of any natural re aces' X 311 U M1 M , ON 1 Yes Marbe Pb d. ESQ-x'•t3 or other icnc i w. RAairn of Pi_hlir" f--x;ili ties, irc!t<.irtc3 r cic;cts' '� i. Other 9nvernme,,-t1c' ser-,is ts:' 15. Energy. Will the prcpo-i!a; re-nilt in: o. Use of �Ljbslcntial arnorints of furl or energy? x � -.,Lsrcint;c, irCVC, in Cs rr.cncj up'XI exisl- ing sources of erergy, or r!!guire the r da.:elopment of ne-M srxarCr_z of en'r j.1 ._.,�. ._._.�. I q. Ut111ti". Will the prcowal result in a need for new syst,.-!rns, or subs .anti;jl alteration.i to the following utilities; o. Power or ncttirol ycs? x b. !=ornrr�t.rrlication5 systerns� �� X c:. Wote'rr? X 10 Sewer or se;)t is tcnks7 if* c., Storrrl water drninc_,C? X r f, �Olicj w�ts;e c�rxi �IisUc75al? X i 17. Punxn HeaIfh. `.;'ill .tote proposal result in, a. Crection of cny, haulth h"=crd or ariftntial hcalth ha7ord (exr. luding mental heolth)? X ' b. Exvosure of pe=ple to potential heclth wcu crds X P. r Aest )et1= Will the prci)oaal result in the ocsstmction of crty scenic vista rsr view opf n to the pvblic, cr -mill the proposal result in the creotion of art oest;letically offensive site open to pilb lic view'? r 19. Recr vat ion. Will the proposal resvil in cr► impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational oppc Ounities? x 20. Cultural Rev_xure=., cF WiI1 ,the prcp*wl re:%ult in the alteration of or the destcuc#ion of a prehistoric or historic aroi alogka! site? x r JJ 't YCx M'a'be T o �+,b5t o ntl'JI Ir_p n r5f r.1' ;-ir)nrettne:'vr'i')Ir natural resource? 10. Risk of Upset. MO tIo-- prr�--Ql in•:�Ivs-: 0� A risk of can explaziQn or the release of hctzardays zubstcrcex tx,t ryd limited to, oi!, pe,sti^.idea, r:`,emir:als car rodicrtion) in sl->,r: cvent of ai rxvidtnt o Vp3et ccxtdil;wzi? x .._ t�, r(iiibie interferery-e with can erT►crgeney re:;>onse plan or an emerger)cy evucuatico plan? x 11 . PopuIciion. ',Vill the prcpo".1 alter th.e Icc-mion, distrrbwi-x,, density, or growth rate of the x Niman pop,rIaticn of m arm? 12. Hcxxsir7g. Will the proposol csff►mot existing houz- x ir,g, or cre-j?e a da,acrid far cddit ionnl housing' ; 3. 'Mill ttm proposal rev.,It in: 0. Generction of sub3icrrtio► adaitiorc.1 X. t vehicular rnovr±r:ren t'' b. Effects can existing oar; inj facilities, ar• X dermand for new ac;rk imp c. Substcnticl in•tvcxt upon existing tr ceisaar- x eOtlon 1%3trnS? d, Alterations to present of circula- tion of mrwtrnettt ofIc and►cr r.1cc�r.z' ..�__ . x e. Alterctions to water`rorme, rail or air traffic? x f. " lncr"se in traffic hczarc�3 to rector vehicles, biryclista e+r pe'�Jestricns? x 14. "'colic Services. 'Hill f!,e prcaosc:l havz cn rfect (.Q-on, or result in a need foe new or altered governmentcl services in eny of the followiny areas: a. Fir* protection? X b, Police protection? x C. Schools? � x 312 y w 1 t•We IVo b. M I I the prg>cu,,l re=lt in cxtverse phrrsicc—,l . or oesthe#is off eels to a pre hktrxic or . historic: huildirv, 3trix:t+ire, or cobj-r-rt? ._.._._,-. - X — C. Clom the p r oposa I hcree t time j:�o t off t i o i to C OUSe a phf3 ii_a i cfxwVe *+i ch wc4Id o f f e-0 unigvv erhnic mil h,.;ai vrj!ues? - -� x d. Will the pt oN. -sol rezt7'iL�t exist ire or xvred uw witt•r:n the potential inrect ar cc? x 21 . cndart c ry F i rxi i r'Sis or S►gn i f i r w r.a. a. Does the prajen-t txt•-nr. the patential to degrade. they rtjolityr of the ewr-imrmint , substar.tiully reduce the hcbitar of u fish or -.wildlife species, raise a fish cr wiW- li fes populcticn to drw :jclow !.If sus - i .oining !e•veis, threes ten to a lir*iino tc -3 I p!cnr r,r onir;mrl c.orrin-iunity, reduce the rximber ce- re5.rict the rage of o rare or endongered plcnt or cnimal c)r eliminate irrrdarfant excmpfes of the major periods x 4 � or California historf ex prehistory? b. Cims the pro ie± t ncee ;r►e pztential -o , ochie:•/r :chart-terr-TI "o t.`1t disaduvntcl •* of Icxmq-term, envirr-nmentcl goals? (A shc'; r- term irmpcnt cr, the environmen! is one whir?) occ--jrs in c rek.-Tively Lri*_f, der:nitive Period of rime !rxg-term in-pr.:ts x Will endured well ir•tto tf;e fut-t;re,) C . Dces the project have itrpcc;s whir:h are individually limited, bur curnulativerly con- siderable;? (A project rnvy irrper.. t on t-ka or more separate rescowr ces where „le- impcCt on e:och resource is re!atively small, but f Where the effect of the total of those x ir,-pcos on the environment is signiricant,) d. Cues the proirc t he7ve enviro mme ntal affects which will cous•e iubstcnticil odve.;•se effec?s 1 cn hurmcre beiN--t, r:;ther di;•ectly or indirectly? ' Ill. Discussion of Environmental Evaluatim lY. (oterm;nat ion ro be cafnV!eted by the Lead Alter c74 'w 1 314 •r r q•. •Y Y l]isc.uasi -3n of F.n\,irOrUnt TO:al EVAIuacton i . Earth r b . 4 . .1 ,Ptvxl :,;- el.y 2 , 5,0 e:sbic •yr, rd.4 of e;ccth ill be exsavaracd { • from will cellars , wall footings and val ,,t boxes . If IuitabIa , S apr1 fox imatel7 ' ,0 cubic yards nf t:1at — ,carLAI will be used co lot, landscapt berms , if the material is determined to be, swiceble f. cr r•hac , puvposa . It is rhtraeore erseinatetd that a �T�t'al of ,�*GO cubic yards of excess material wilt nand eo bt trACt6(;a." e:ca off chi pr0jtc►: sietl— there should he nn r_! angr. !.e err. :-rr.r. cvt,rz11. hei he 3 n d arada cf• the % Lcea . 'the .Arta Ca11- Within rile extension of c h* Alqui.sr:•-Prtolo rtptscial :study zone. . The effects Ellis �ould have. on the proposed project should be scudi.ad . WAaer b , f a The cr.aplece burring of bank sites could affect drainage g. patte:r , trn Cha surrounding area . As many as 34 .000 barrels a da ;► of fit cere,l br ire water :could be in jetted into oil bewaring Eer:nacions . Th►t brin.± water would r.oroe f:rain on* or Lwo new star source we11s to be Icracr.d oucs '.de cha prr.jac- r area . As an ALCt Mat ill 0 , the project: tray acqui-t and use surplus produr.cd waters iron, ocher oil operations in the Cicy . The effects from this Should be decerma:;t+ed. e b. No13v a . Unmi.cigaced noises Erorn well drilling operations would fa ~ exceed che: Ctsv ' s noise standards For rtsidencial Atlas , Voise levels of .°3 to 90 dB(A) can t.rplcally redulc frun standard diesel powered e I e c t r i c drLlli:+g rig operations . The approximately 1,5 amaIoveet .ho will visit` the si :a � dkir T13 a 21, hour period could be exposed cc severe noire f• levels should they go unenACi3 aced . I 7 . Light and Glary: The 24 hour drtllLng operation gill require orne Iighr. ing at nighe . Poeeric :aI Lrrlpaccs from liihr Arid glare should to addressed, 8. ,Land Use The s :.te is currantly zoned Oldtown Specific plan (Nstrlcc two) -- 0 which permits single and muttl---Snit c'-aellings - Detyelopoeene of the site as an oil recoveev! project wculw e; liminaca paceneial residences . 9. Natural Resources sob. The pro jecc will recover about five: million barre is of s unre f ined crude ai 1 thAt would noc be recoverRd under tutr ant operating methods . the project will be a nee energy producer. about 4.69 million barrels of oil after deducting equivalent barrels for energy consumed in oparationes. ; 4 i c ,t -' sk of 414: Tht POC C rlC i A ! V. cat file , Uil lea leal. And j.bandci r,,ecl wt p tcb I e..Is holi I j 60 w.''; Iti; c d Vie. p r o p a ia r r., , na e t:wo blacks c C po c a nc. i A I r a s i a I 1-i eo. :-.2!s rp, !tic-. i,r..4 rh t p c j)t j I a z _or; j n c!.c ;j-es 12. NOUSLn3 Th* proj a c c w i I I ellmCnarce v,c e n r La I rasidenc.ei a.1d create A 3 ma -Oj n.be r of jc,hs r r.q u rini? -a r 1 a i i : I .3ma I I i,-.:0 U n L of ;d d i r i o ma 1. h 0 Ll S ink. Trani rca t LQn/C i :c-.41zc �.on A b c d ApproxLmAcely 40 vm hiC.'.A 1 12 r L7 i s per da:1 w I I b t n ov r a t e d dur in5 the drilling 9 ha s c a n I appv:)% --Mar " l7 140 P 5 per da... during chn production phase . I c Hill be riecessar? co c t a up c.' e ince7!cccicin of Sp r ing f i t! I I Averue and Ca I ;.A'o r-n i.a 5 -,et to ,rake a cannecz-ion between t h e tvd sites . The c C-)PO ra 7-.1 i.no a c c o c h Of 3 hou L d be .analysed.• ?ub I ic 5 !v., c *s a . C ma i r 'oil operation such as ch L s req u i.ra inn-. cased f- re pro- cccc ion. Camp let icin of the r c a ds Cl.lr! -; and 3,.j-Lt3.-3 SU.'rJund...13 the penjecc add co maLnclenance requirements . 1jc i L i c ic s r SL&nifLcar.r. sold wa s c,! in chi form of Cc i 11 cutr:ings and speric d:'L I ling Mm d Vi 11 be gene racad during L h.E C'7. --* L I i h 2 the pro jec: *which may require Foeclal disposa 1 17 litimAn Health b Oil '14*e I I d r-.' t 1 '.-ig and p vaduc i r-.g Ope 73 C.i o n s inva Lve heavy a;.0 i;r.e n c Va la-- t Le ma Is are used by and produced by pro.'t!c : c3pe i .-ris - Mt and nearby reii1terizs silouldbP considered Allizhecics T.hd po c 4!nt LA I al zar,%c inn CE vitaws due co the proposed dr-1 I ling and racaver:r equipmenc on t.,e pro jecc s i :z from roa d-.ia v's a n d exLst ing lind uses should be anal ysed. K k M. the hwis c , r t• Lj t r~i t t o 1 e►v o f I,o r c,.c . I t inJ tt t f!:e pro-pr)3e-i pra jec:t MOULD NOT T i•lavle: a 31;I1i f iccint c f fe:-r t cw, ;I►e envirorxi'men., and c l"* GA IVE fM)F::'�,��F�,�`��i'IOP I v-,ill tie prepared. I firrd ' Ov? alth-c-ugh IN- F,rcrnzcd Prc)j:!,L ; cc.uld tk;,.,,. a sr,nificmn.' effect I —�•--� r on the envirr)nrii.!tr1i , ttirre will n., t be: a 4ignificorlt effecr in this case L-ecv s,r the, 17.1illi9ctiol) R'Cc ,;l.rry o:'lCr il:1v6 +xi ctl ctttcc�'d-d shet:t "Icw." �.. .,etn oddecl tv the proje,::t. .A 'IE(iA i I','F DEC-'LARATILTI 'MILL eF PREPARED. I Nr,l tt* propaseci 'projm:t MAY hcvt a significa-it c: ffe-:4l cxc rtn-iron- rr.cs lr, and an ENVIR0, 4ME\1'i AI- Isti1OAC— T F EPQR T id w t 0 .igNturt F or (More: This is anl;l a suggested furrn. PUblic c:qe'r�cie3 are fret to tl-•rir own fcrrrrtt for initic:l .studies.) 46 313 r4r,� r� 1• ' SUllM7:TTA""U BY MUY PhR111.111, Ii 1 i i s a rA ri CONCERNED CITIZENS FOR HUNTING7 �, N BEACH Dimloh} CA '92646 CITY 01 DKFA117"Mm OP COWUMHITY JX-a"VELOTREVT ATT: CATUARIN"E. 01HARA Pear Ma O 'Hara: RE: 1)RAFT SU11PLE1,1121T J-?,!P)WT 'RE-iORT i3O. 65-1 AUGUST, 1 9W In re3ponse to the ANGUS SETT Juat received, *e wr,uld like ..to bring your attention to the following CQNCML74E:D CITIZENS comments: A6-1 ; 2) CVIMENTS A:iD RESPON16B DUST COUTROI: At CONCEITED C.TTIZr,.NS requeet, the COUNTY AIR .dOk';?-T) cane to measure the dust at project ziite , They reported by tha-6 the wind factor was only .6l.ee der 11c)ul, i1i that particular, day. The 1. dust bloving was comi rig frorn the unf inialied G t.L%.'t. to qu_Tr'.)Un'J.` 11af tha tivo pro jer"t mites and as we went im-U, Lhe dryer month of July the dust frtctor would get worse . A warning %was sent to xUGUS, but no fine could be made an thrt date . vie were advised to call again when the wind factor Tyas over 15 milej per hour aniL another mere;-arement will be lande . 00 11C.ERITTED CITIZENS never ob.sorved w)y ova ter being put on the guiles 'L,iigh -aotuida of dirt to control the d-,!%,t. ,'If: v0ire subjected to unhealthy layezu of dust in our atmosphere and homes botmeen OCTOBLR 1p 1987 a nd J M.E 17 1988 due to the Santa Ann wind conditions , wild. be soon upon us again. A 6-i (4 j HEAVY VT TR 0 C'K Ti It F F I C Accordirq, to SEIR, A5-110, a 58 foot turniml, rad_J.u.;'- is needed for a ii semi. tractor-trailer Delaware Street is beet vide -iith one-half only paved. Turning south on Delaware off Springfield A,renue at oil drilling site will be risky for snhnol children and their bus to be so near to Rny truck twming path to the entrance of the drill. site on Delaware Sti-cat. The opposite entrance i.i on California Street. Califora'.Ei 811-rc-et is wide and only half paved on residential 91de. CONCERNED CITIZENS are having, difficulties in believin M_ that the project will have only two trucks (what S-3.,Z-7e? -per &ay coair4 to the project site during drilling phase and no additional truck 'trastic duriza the pruduution phase. Very truly yours, r C011CM".BD CITTZWS FOR H B MARY V. FA RISH a*: :ohn Wasterseler TRFASURER CILUMM GROUP aohn B. Murdock 144 s)Of AO r- RUV) 1:;W OF Slill-I P 1, R. FOR 11,111, AUG11", 0.1j, 11,60409.1"1 . 1.938 w.�.+ss.ur.-w.,awrr� .-..` .�.. .+�..mlr.r.�..w.�....y.... •�-..�«.r+ �� 1 I r i 1 X"7ZIN at' Vklif'r SilrZIAA1":iI'IAL I1I!P.M.T REPORT FOR 'I HX ANGUS ui rl RECOVERY PROJECT ,Ira No , brinlA91 i• i Prepared for : CC'RCERNLD CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON DFMCM C/o Alt ,- Pary R PA r ri sh , Traasn�e r 1919 Alsunu Rana Huntington BcaAck1 , rA 92648 I Prmpac*d Jays 4RJ#1' B B RB 'GRt` UP O 111C. 2933--6 rullm&n Street Banta A►n&, CA 9270E TelRphon®s ( 714 L 261--5414 1 SEPT191lEM 1989 Vl REVIEW OF VNAPT SllPt*i,ZRZ TA►L IMPACT REFORT FOR VIE ANGUS OIL ALCGX?FJtY ?ii0,1E,T SCH NO. 86040917 INTRODUCTION Thlat lacirivient was prepared under r:r-Aract, to the Concerned Ciisxens of Huntington Beach and surnmbri .es Chambern Group, Xnc . ' ); Y'ovl.c,w -if t►'e o� aft+ i,,pplemental EIR ( Draft )E.t.R) for the jPx0pe., -;ed3 "'14-Uz 0;A R(tq,.overy Frnject . Tkie Drafft was reviewed by f Ch,-�mbera Group0a technical stakE under the direction c,i mr . -*-()" s.'-, Wt�stermeler . chambers Gra-kip gpec {+ liza!i in the k):'eparat,+lon o ,. documents foi: on— and Jffshare oil, and qao projects . We tiave preps .red rrve r 1. 0 major oriv'i rain-- mev,tal documents fe-, r and state, ;A_tencles for oil and rp pre'aiects St•at of Cal :i,korni., . Thin review is divided Arita two major aections a The brat sectlon prnvxdea our general comments on the ducumont and the second section provides our specific 0:0mmeuts on various subject, rarea$; . we have also included a brief conclusion Lo our review following our spec:�iflr• comnionts . i ,s 16 1 Y Y i s� R VZNBHKL COMMi.NTS No have Identified several ir:agular. i.ti.es in the Draft SEIR whiche In ou► opinion , makos the 'Draft inadequate in its present form . Theme are described below ; 1 . The summary of findings fails to =onfcrm to section 1.5121 of CfqA in that the aussa ry should Include all aigni f i cant, Impacts and mitigation Neasurretw as well as Identification of alternatives that could reduce these impacts to significant levels . The summary fails to list. ,�11 significant impact; Identified in the main text of the document. The sumzaary' does not discuss alternatives , areas of controversy cc iss+aes to be resolved . 2 . Thm D rQft SEER fails to address the environmental issues associated with the construction of a. water pipeline from the Chevron facility to the propusrd project site . Ccnatruction of such a pipeline would have they potential to create treiffic, air quality, noise and publia a-afet3f impacts that are not addressed in the ducument . F'TArthermcre , the water quality impacts are slot addressed should the pipeline rupture during operation . 3 . The SIM door not address the impacts associated with the construction of a gas pipeline to the Chevron facility. An desc ribod, under No. 2 above , there could be signiflemnt isparcts associated with construction of the pi ieline as well ee the public astecy laYpacts aesocta►ted Frith A potential pipeline rupture. 4 . The project site is rather uniq,eer in that the proposed 4rilling and processing site is loceated directly adjacent to 2 J�?y �16 y y AM! residential units . Ths NEiR does not address the impacts in enough detail necessary to determine the actual impact, nor does it identify specific mitigation aaeasures to reduce any ido"tified impacts . Of particular concern is the release of toxic materials during accidents and spills , as well an than Migration of gays due to t`�e repressurization of the formation . The SEIR tailc to idesntAfy the criteria that were used for the determination of significance of impacts . Addit Lunally, the effectiveness of the mitigation measure►~ and the significance of the residual imp+aeta have not been clearly dotined . 6 . Although the SEIR does identify various pro jectts fur cimul A— tive ana►lysir ,, it fails to provide an analyr;is of,` the overall cumulative impact, determ! nation of the eignificance of thi.a impact and formulation of mitigation measures ,as requi ccd in Section 15130 of CEQA , Thi analysis fails to ruflect the full range of cumulative Impacts partir.ula -Ay for systems safety, seismicity , ha:nzdous mat,erlals , noise and water quality . � 7 . ahze SEZR fails to address a fu17 range of alternatives . in ptarticuJar , it does not address the alternative of proc.,ss},ing oil at a site remoata from the proposed pvo ject area.. This a►ltarnat,ive would substantially reduce the systaAs safety istpact associawed with a fire in the storage tanks . it also does nog address the No -,Ji1. Storage Alternative: nor does it address alternative des'. gns of the proposed f.a%ilitiea an the ip coposed sites. Additlortally, the document :aes not con.ider an alternative where 4he unprocessed oil IF. transferred via a now pipeline to the. Chevron facility, eliminating the need for separate procersing facilities . ;� -•r .•+,� � � ate. "•': 0 . The OUR fails to identify an Environmentally Supsiri-3r Altaxnative to royuired by •actian 15130 of the CZQA guidelines . r � 9 . The SVIR fails to prr�videt d full, list of pteparevs as required by CHCA. 4! 04, + � 1 5 `.r 4 SPEC U I C COXRZXTS Ao Topography, boils, and Geology 1 . The SHIR fails to address the consequences of the 8 .0+ •acthquak• on the opercation of facilities including such Oftects as rupturing and overturning cf tanks , rupturing of contaiainent dikes and other accidents than would have � a potential far release of product:. This damage would h;.ve the potential to affect the neighboring residences and would exacerbate any public safety impacts � associated with damage to residential units . No mitigatior. measurers aL,e proviC ad in terms of emergency procedures , mobile containment facilitles3 rye tae like to �I mitigate any potential impacts associated with release of products during a seismic event . j Is. Rpdrology 1 . The SEIR fails to identify the w&ter quality impacts associated with the construction and oparatiLon of the proposed gas pipeline and brine pipeline . 2 . The safR fails to identify the water quality impacts I sesociated with the potential rupture of the crude oil pipeline carrying the oil produced by the proposed r l project to the Chevron 1•i.ity. While we understand that use of an existing pipeline contro,kled by • Chevron is proposed, the proposed project will nevertheless create additional quantities of oil shipped in the pipeline and the release of this additional all should be Addressed . y.,w . M i 3+ The hydrolegy section does not: address the water quality impacts to the groundwater aquifer dui to the releastr of crude oil , saolvents or other toxic material . 4 . The scrh rails to identify ttze impact of disposal, of filtrate material associated with the processing of injection water , C. zarosd as& 1 . The Safit fails to address the impact of the proposed project on the exdstinq ZXAR' s for the proposed project . D. Aes-thatics g Light and G14 sre 1 . The $211t does not address thL flood lighting required during the drilling process . 2 , The SCIR only contains one renderincj of the proposed project . it does not show scale nor does it have a descriptJon of permptict.ive . Several scaled renderings from several vicwpol nt:is would be naceasary to assess the vi -. .:al impact . R. Mr Quality r 2 . The 3919 does not describe the air quality impacts associated with cc-natruction of the gas and water pipeline$ . -rho SRxR also does not address the dust-related impacts noted by area homeowners during the initial construction f. t E -' .r. .}* f �o ".4t 4, 1. l phase . Additional measures for dust control such as u e of dust control chemicals should be discussed . 3 . Although the BLYR does analyzer emissions associated with normal facility operation, it fails to calculate emissions associated with oil spills in the facility , P � Because the facility Is in ' close proximity to residential units, the emissions # including public exposure to b6nzone, should bar calculated for an episode where all is spilled and contained in the containment area and then cleaned up by vacuum truck . 4 . The sn a fails to mention the expected concentration of 825 within the gas extracted from tho well . since sour sax occurs within the the Huntington Beach Fields , the air quality , analysis should include morteling of the � exposure of H 2 5 to area residents in the event of release of toxic gas . �'. "*is* .1 . The SEIKO as w911 as the previous CIR, did not quantify the magnitude of impact of the noise associated with th6 drilling operation. The extent of mitigation afforded by the control, measures ha%' e► not been beef quantified- in order to determine whether ie:pacts have been reduced to 1 insignificance $ i' eiw risk ot Qps t/duszaa hw al tha and Safety else construction of a majcr oil and gays facility -in close 11 proximity to presidential areas presents special systems safety problems . The analysis in the SEifi generally takes the approach that if an .event is unlikely to occur, there is 7 % ' - r no Impact . The general state-of-the-art analysis for oil an gat projects projector vase the project impacts on conse- quences of an accident , not upon the probe hili,ty of occurrence!. it. is likely that even an event of lore probabil— ity of occurrence could occur during the life of the project . The analysis of this section is fully inadequate , lacking gUantitatiVO analysis aorauning reasonable worsts-caste analysis and fails to provido detailed mitigation measures to mitigate or reduce the cansequsnces of are upset or accident . r Additionally, a preliminary risk management plan and spill, contingency plan should he - -ovided during review of the 9EIR In ordec to fully evaluez .se effectiveness of the programs proposed for mitigation . Deficiencies noted in this section include : I . The S91P. states that there will not be any impact caused by leakage of ryas due to repressurixation of the j formation. This conclusion is bats9d on studios Indicating few current problems with existing wells . The proposed waiterflood project woulri initially substantially increase pressure within the Eorna►tion and may cause gas leaks aL wells that currently do not leak . Additional studies are required to determine the extent of this ippact and realistic mitigation measures such as resealing of vQ11s , use of gas detector* in homes and the use of evacuation plans must be provided. µ 2+ The suR should discuss the impact cf fire and/or explosion at the drill rigs in addition to those Impacts associated Frith oil storage . 3 . The Stir should discuss Lhe potential for releaser of gat containing W.a from both the facility and from the pipel,lne . Hazard footprints should be calculated based c,l�l'a ,r1 : 1'1 LL Illyyy��1' k on the concentration of H2a as well as the volume in the t; Pipeline or wall head. 4 . The SUR should di 3cuss the potential for fire and eaploslon from natural gas at the well head or in the " pcopos,ad pipeline. t, S . The $1911t should discuss the incremental impact of all Spills or fires in the Chevron crude all pipeline . d. Q%larttities of each hazardous chemical projected for use should be estimated. An analysis Should be made of the 1 impact of spills of the quantities of loch chemical as well as combination of chomicalm ors. the surrounding I areal R. srai!ic I . The SEIR does, not address the traffic impacts associated with the construction of the gas and water pipelines . i, 9 e, ,7' , r r' • CONCLUSION I' Our review of tt o SMIR has pointed out 4wveral major deficiencies IA the document including the aaissxon of analysia of two major pipelia*is diceott,y associated with the project:. a's well o,; not previdinip a comprehensive analysis of the cumiAletive impacts of the prepamied projecto AdOitionally, the systems safety aspect of they proposed pcoject anti several other issues have not been adequately addroased . Substantial revisinn of the current Draft BUR is therefocer requirod . Since the revised document %A11 undoubtedly Identify addtticnal slognificant impacts, we bel,hever that the revised document should be recirculated as a graft SHAH to allow further review by both Responsible Ageficies and the; � i Public b(ofore consideration by the decl lion makers of the City. � I w 3. 10 , a r lr .,1i {1{ ri I huntington beach department of community development STAf f TO: planning Crtrmission FROM: Community Development DkrE : October 18 , 1980 SUBJECT: ZOV E CHANGE NO. 8 8-11/USE PERMIT NO. 8 8-2 5 ( IN - CONJUNCTION WITH SUPPLEMCNTAL E►RVIROlOME11TAL IMPACT REPORT NO . 88--1) � r AMLCPAT: Angus Petroleum Corp , DATL_M. .T.ED : 5772 Bolsa Ave , , Sty . 210 August 23 , 1988 Huntington Bch . , CA 512649 � jL : oldtown Specific: Plan- Augi+st 23 , 1989 Di ;it ri ct 2-0 —•Y'... � +.T1.... 11..V .r-__ --flp.h. ^ �.Wlyr_a.M�TI'.1r'.w�Y^M uN�-[•Al.. Ili\rn.r..- -''.� 1� 1M. . .�...T.Y. GENERAL .. Medium ...Density =-�'�...._. -- -- ....._....� _ .�. ..... Vacant with PLAN : Reside:,tial oil production77 � .._T.�._ - --_'7 � Q��••�IJ IJ�� b..4�{r/1 A �.{1r�1�.r•_.,�%...: ..- � �—i.^_psi-•�...�.:�'. -...n-�.. ..�:�L ...� • J . �}U: Rezorke ]Slock A. (Tract 1274 7) frcm � - "Oldtown Specific Plan-District Two-Oil racili.ties (OT--2--0) " to "Oldtown Specific flan-Distriet IWO--Oil ! .�. Facilities with Oi.1 D.rilliny(0Z!-2-1?1). " -.to e.l.low_-the drilling of new 0 i1 wells . • - . . __. . _... ._ . �L ��i�•.-- Zo` ��v�Tvp::-Sri_:rriI•��r�d�E�fii��t3��i'., d�.�:-Y� '� _. . -..: on Block Aand as oil fadfity Uiri e Also requested i a a reduction- cf__extarlo.r, si.dey;ard setbacks from ten ( 10) feet co a minimum seven (7) feet for the north and south elevations of both Blocks . ' - �•:�. Ott.. The'-project site -cunuists of two blocks located on opposite corners as follows : IIIQs;k A LTraa J2 LU : bounded by Springfield Avenue , Delaware Street , Rochester Avenue and California Street; and 1gch B (TracLj AL) : bounded by Toronto Avenue, California Street , Springfield) Avenue anA Huntington Street . LA A OW410 ( a) Approve and recommend that the City Council adopt zone Change No . 88-11 ; and (b) Approve Use 'Permit No . 88-•15 based on findings and conditions of approval . 2 . 9 QUEBAL I&tQHMA. 14.R : Zone Change No . 88-11 is a request to rezone Block A ('Tract 12747) and add the " O1" suffix to allow the, dirs fling of new oil wells . At �r06�[1t , both Slockr3 A and a are .urrently zoned to allow existing o:;. l operations . Block A requites the "Li" suffix to permit new oil wells . Use Permit No . 86 -425 is a request to establish a consolidated drill site and oil operation of both blocks , ,CLD uS' � N _� NFRA � Lt�M_Q1 Z rSaiV,�x�Y-a l h.p.rr -�, . . __ ..... --- - ... _. -..-... . _.. ... •: GENERAL PLAN ,DESY-GHA.TION : Medium Urn) i ty Residential- - ZONE: 016town Specific Plan LAND USE : F.esidenLial Supplemsnt;al Environmental Impact Report No . was prepared Z,s a supplement to they previously propared Environmental Impact Repa:.t: w .r'ri were prep,$r.ed.- to apses.s the-environment. impart relative to Z ;W Charge No . 88--11 and Use: Porrait No . 88--25 . Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No . 88- 1 and Environmental j Iepr- aB -�- x6pes :nt a.. etakled- anal�-sis-oiE the rrojer..t , -- --- pToJect;--m1&t*'d i.mlWets , alternatives and measures intended to adverse environmental , inpact s . Prior to any action on Zone Change No . 88-11 and' -Use Oerrn't No . 88-25 , it i:a necessary that the Planning Commiesion review and act -:n Supplemeutal Environmental Impact: Report No . 88-1 and Environmental Impact Report No . 86-1 . _ All suggested mitigation measures rec;ommendel_i in Supplemental hnviroametntal Impact Report No . 88-1 and Environmental Impact Report f' No . 85-1 have been incorporated Into con1i.tions of approval. . k . I 5* Y.,CQASTAL__JzTA Not applicable. I I. gZDXVELQPH= STAMS : Not applicable . The project is located within the boundaries of the Oldtown Specific n, . Plan-District 2 which is a medium density residential district . both Block A and N currently hive the "0" suffix which permits existing oil wells , oil facilities and oil storage operations . This project compliox with the requirements of the Oldtown Specific plan-. District 2 except for the exterior side yard setbacks . The alinat is requosting a reduction of exterior sideyards from tern6t t o a minimum of sever, (7) feet . in 4 Report - 10/18/88. -2- ( 1453d) � p, r a . 0�..A-U .l- Slog COMIZ= : Not Xpp 1 icab1e 910 DIES. AND ANA .YS3.S The proposed waterflood oil recovery project is an attempt to h consolidates isolated coil leasers into a singlo project area , x According to the applicant , oil recovery will be approximately ni1nn million barrels from the Springfield Oil Field by dire,ctional drilling and a consw 1 idated recovery system. Pumping ., and tank facilities are to be Located on 81o;k H (Tract 12746) All oil will be trenspor}ed by pi .,:line and not by surface vehicles , Block A (Tract 12747 ) will contain a marimum of 45 wells which include both injectors and producers . Development of the project will be in two phases . Phase One will. Do the construction of off -si.trr and un- site impruveT!^:;nts anti facili.tips , Prior to the drilling of any new well , t,ho applicant will construct: street improvements , sidewalks , the. perimeter walls , lardscapinq , tank fac:.ilit; es and pipeline connections . Phase Two _wi l.l. be . the ._dri l,ling oE- Ta_.rn:►raanum..� �.._�cew^w�+1�..,,__►�r.; 1.1.iny .wi 11 --t�e_...Y._ c�onti.nuuus for .approximately" 24 rro;iths utilizing on ., dri ?. 1 incl rig operating 24 hours a clay . The applicant estimates I.-Oat: i-he drilling of: the new wells can he better accomplished by „-,Jinq one rig over a time span of 24 months . The project will, bci- scrl?-Iciied on each ;side of -both blocks by Ln eight ( a) foot high rn8nc,:iir wall, and larids::ape buffe,: which will enhance the project grid rc.reen tho operations from the surrounding neighburhood . The masonry walls grill be softened by multiple - planter areas in addition to intensiEded tree -plan-sings [auri_n,l , thV 24 mont.h drilling. phase, a 30 foot:__higb acous�t:i.c�alL � blanket w3. 1i be installed around the perimeter-, inside the block � walls and a sound blanket: will be installed around the drilling rig which w.i i 1 mitigate noise as suggested by Supplemental BIR 28-1 and reQuived by the City ' s ordinance Cade . After the site development and drilling phases , the operation will be somewhat passive . � Periodic maintenance rigs will be required to use acoustical � blankets on power source and will be Iimi.ted to daytime hours . The entire operation will be monitored on an ongoing basis for compliance with Title 8 (poise) and Title 15 (Oil Code) of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code and the conditions herein . Prior to drilling each now well, a separate drilling permit; must be cbtafned from the City with approval from the Fire Chief . This will, enable the City to stxictly Mni.tor, the success of the mitigation measures and protect the surrounding existing neighborhood from distilrbances . The applicant: has requested a keducti.on of the exterior side yard setback from ton ( 10) feet to seven ( 7) fees: , Section, 9.110 . 7( b) of the Huntington Reach Ordinance Code allo�is for a reduction of exterior side yard setbacks based on four ( 4 ) findings based can improved design , compatibility with the surrovnding neighborhood , and enhancers architectural variation . Staff Report - 10/18/88 -s- ( 1463d) r 1 , Tha perimeter wall that is proposed to surround bath blocks does Comply with the findings for a reduction of the ten ( 10) foot setback. The variati.ou in Methuc k range 8 from seven ( 7) fo-et to twenty--f ive (2.5) feet . The material V.-ill be :,split face which provides a rchi toctura 1 variation . The perimeter U ncinq combined with Lhe landscape mat:eria .ls wall not be det ziniental to property values , the genaral health ox welfare nor privacy of p9oplo residing in the existing surrounding neaiyhborheiod . Staff recommends U. 3t the planning Cornrrission : ( a ) Approve and rer..onuriend that: UIP " i t-y Cf..1111"C.L L dd(,Pt-- 'InTle (Alange No . 88-.11 ; and ( b) Approve use Permit No . 88-25 btese6 on f indinUs ,-.rid condi}_ .)ns of appraval . i i 1 . A change of zone from "Oldt:ct,ni ;pecific. Plan, Distr. idt.: .'Z'wo--%I (Oil. Operations exc� urring oi. l C+rilli.nq ) to "Oldtown Specific Plan, district Two-01" (OA- 1 dperation> i.nc: ludin9 0- 1 Dri.11,in(j1 w:i1, 1 be co nip atibIC, with sia ,� r')u'n'ding. .re ! i-deTn'Ei,a1 use's ..bi -cin the :-Itigation measures deiscr.ih,�d in the environmental impact repurt* and conditions of approva '_' outlined in Mew use perm'. t . 2 . The proposed zone c:harnge is con%;istent with the gcal.i and oliC.ie�s� of. e Genera* Plan . Unitization and r.QnaolL;.d_*j.;-ion of existing oil opey-at_i ins i ,; encouragod t)e3CdUSe It. reduces the land area used for 0', 1 f ac.Ll�.ti.e.s . Apl)roximately 5 . 3 .._. aim, .O- -ems- deve loypable land wi11 bac,;me---avai-Iable a�+&r c;nsolidaci.oh- on the tt•.o blocks ( 3 . 1 acres ) . a . Section 9682 of. Article 968 of the City ' s 2on:e.ng Code prWde g for they establishment of " 01 " Districts . The an:y 11-mitat:ion for such an 01 District is that: of a :L:i,nimu.m surface area ( 100 feet b;; 150 feet) , as required by, Se-Alon 9682 . 1 . The proposad drill sita for the project is considerably larger than the minimum dimensions required by Sect,.or_ 9682 . 1 . Therefore , it is consistent with ., trims provision . b, Section 9682 . 2 requires dedication, or an irrevocable offer of dedication , of all real property thst the City may raqui :.e for its streets and other public service facilities or improvements . All Cf.t:y-required dedicstions will be implemented through the t.ernis of recorded tract maps for the project sites. Therefore , the project is consistent with this pro-vision . $tsf i Report - 10./18188 -4- (14536) { 1„T 1 . a r •:( :i V ,fir .�4 ('� .,•� .I• 1 , I, a. The project will remove oil, producing facilities from six sites, thereby permitting the xestorat;can of oil sitars scattered over 160 screr . Although oil producing facilities will remain on the project site, the appearance of the project site will be improved over its lresent condition . Therefore * the pr(�Ject is consistent with thie Policy. d , With respect to the .Land Use Element, polio es have been translated into a Zoning sn4 Land Use Element Consistency Matriu . The matrix shows that am a miscellaneous district: -01 may be combined ( i . e . is consistent ) with any land use category. it 13 specifically consistent with low, medium �r and medium-high density residential categories . 3 . Compliance with 'title 6 and T.It le 15 of the Huntingt:o-, beach Municipal Code and rile use perrait condW urns of approval will ft re ---thst • the proposed use a l lowed by tho, zone change wi l;. not be detrimental to the 6ener,al health, welfare , and safety rt� ��'h'`u�•h..��1�1./•-!"i..�w�a. rw1�V+..a.+a.-_ .. •=tiaw.r�-�,...•�-T• ,+.w•+•a.�•'.=..-r+.rry�-+ . ..�w...r..•w��' R":'4-•�I�F+^•+'-+ i �.,..�•�-.L�� :Tyr. ,as.tabl.�� nl�f•• main�enanc$..ax,t1••-ope'F•a-t-ion •ofa;hs�o�1-�... . :. . . , _. . r .� opezatAon will not be detrimental uo the general welfare of �persone residing o working in- the vicinity ; pr�,peci y and 1s► srrrents -:,in rho• ricinity of such use or uui '.:ding based on the conditions of approval and compliance vyith Title 8 and Title l of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code . 4 2 , Trig proposed oil operation is consintent. with the gods and 6bJgctives of the General Ulan•. � 1,,, @cti�rit.iee are a eft � --}consii.�ifeiit_ use in any- lgz�d categdrjr oi t Ei. Ge7herai'-P1an 3 . The project will consolidate oil operations in one location reducing the visual impact of numerous wells now apreard throughout: the Sprfngfisid Oil Field area . Such consolidation will also be :advantageous for safety and noise reduction purposes . The project %rill result in the abandonment and eclamartio n of .31 existing wells and 16 oil storage banks in the Springfield Oil Field area and will not significantly ..Ancresse tr•iffic in that area . 4 . Supplemental Environmental Impact: Report No. 88-1 and Environmental Impact Report No . 146-1 have determined that any remaining rignificantr effects on the eavironment found to be unavoidable are acceptable due tG overriding conaiderations . 5 . Conditions of approval for tIse Permit No . 88-18 have alirninated or substantially lessened all significant effects on L; ,e erica convent where feasible . 6 . The project will result in increased tax revenues for the City of Huntington Reach arnO other governmental agencies . &r.sff Rep'axt - Mu 18r88 (1453d) J r r a r'. r 7. The conditions of approval. are desirable and necessary in order to effectuate the purpoves of the, Huntington ►each . Munis:ipal Code, the official General plan Land Use, Plan and the bast interests of, the Citt Further , they include mitigation measures mist forth in the final. Environmental Impact Report that w141 assure the location is suitable for the type of use proposed and the following will not result or be reasonably anticipated froin tha project A . Damage or nuisance from noise, smoke, odor, dust or vibration; hazere.a from explosion , contamination or firs . b. Hazards occasion(id by unusual volumes or character of traffic; incompatibility with surrounding development , c . Tha project complies with all requirements of Division 9 except for the illentifind reduction of exterior side)4ard metIback and other applicable provieions' of the Huntington Beach Municipal Cade . disposition of oil wells and for oil operations on the property involved, a.ad for berms , walls and landscaping to w 9 . Chan" s have been-required and incorporated in-the-.project -to ' ' _ Mitigate or avoid the significant adve rce environmental effects of the project : a . The Division of Oil and Gas enforces ruler. arse regulation,$ for the conduct of secondary recovery operations . ..: . V. - "Tiiiff. ffiltigAtioff-IneaSure-fir inMrpo'feted`, -propostm al'Cd -,.. ..� -- 3dopCed, together with application of the rules and regulations of the Division of oil and .Gas , will effg�ct:vely mitigate all of the adverse impacts identified . c . Public agencies other, than the City, including the Division of Oil and Gas , tteq.ional Water Quality Control. Board and Routh Coast Air pualiLy Management District, will be re-.4ewing aspects of this project for mi.tigatiori measures as to matters within their responsibility and jurisdiction, including subsurface operation, water and air quality; the critical need for oil renders infeasible this alternatives of no project or delayed project implementation , and alternative surface locations are infeasible because of their limited availability, or tho greater disruption to the community at larVot which would result therefrom . Staff Report - 10 18/88 -6- 4>'Ml• + r' t r ,fir 10 . The sub,je et 'Location is contrWy oceted within the d rinpitie ld Oil riAld area; relocating the proposed project to a other site is i0essible . 11 . Ap substentiol public purpose would be served by denial of use r�i,t IQ. �-13 but rather : a . rt is important that the United States develop its existing oil reserves in order to meet Its energy needs without increasing dependence on foreign oil , and this proj6ct will result i*d incremental 'recovery. of approximately nine ( 9 ) million barrels of oil ; and b. The project will eons;;widatse oil operations in one locatirino reedurAng the visual impact- of numerous wells now spread throughout the Ol:dtown portion of the City; and +c . SUtrh c0 'kida►tion will also be advantageous for safety s and noise reduction purposes; and WN e ::o ee t"w 'Y' "e"on"I`}� an in ens m u'se o ie surface site involved, and at the terminatinn of the project the atte will be available for recycling into other uses ; and !`a,1.,.. '• .__ .�Gk.+w•�. -'.>�'�i-T.�'�/::?..yr:r;•..w•vY'J�+rYr.Nei. +r .l •�^'�...A':�.fl�•,+.uW0.+K'�.�:t,'_�L'L::a. •_..._a•ti ....� .1....�... _ _ .•tom= .......�,Jtil a The project, U41.1 benefit and accrue to the general welfare of the, City-and the public -for each of the reeasonx sat fo;t'* above . r _. -t•: • Approval -of this project w tl l mducee, the immeedi.a to demand'-, N for more off-shore drilling facilities . _12 . y .The progoaed_oil contoiidation project wil-I have 24 hour Sri- difey, ►eruanri ei�d 'eviil `be sgfer "Eliari- hea`s'iilinq non- continuous monitoring of the 31 scattered wells to be abandolieed throughout the area . This will redugee • the possible attraction of younger persons , 13 . The Most modern, ee�ficiemt energy-saving equipment available till be integrated into the design of the project wrhich . will mitigate environmental ,impacts such as fire, noise and air V*ML, Cants . 14 . The ipplilcant has auhmittesd a property value protection plan which will be implemented as outlined prior to chilling . 15 . The reduction of the exterior sideyard setbacks from ten ( 10) to reeven f 7) feet is based on the following ae . The reduction of exterior sideeyard setback for perimeter wall from lien (10) to seven ( 7) feet will result in improved deem gn and ut.il l f;y of the. project b. The design of the perimeter wall will be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood . Staff Report - 10/18/86 -7- ( 1.453d) ` 1 ref, +VV4 5 *� C . The proposed pacimeter gala with reduced exterior sideyard setback$ will not have a detrimental effect an the general health, safety, welfare or setback privacy of surrounding presidents . a. Variation in vie wall setback is provide thrqugh the use of offset landscape pockets, architectural features and building materials . ' 1 . The site pian, eXevations and landscape plan dated received October L3 , 1988 , shall be the conceptually approved layout . a . This use permit shall not become effective until zone Change No , 88-11 has been approved and in effect . . All structures and procedures shall conform to 'title 15 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code and the Division of Oil and Gas Standards . 3 .' The applicant shall obtain all neces Cary► electrical and bufAding permits . ----goise"monitoring-"3ha'11 *be cond0c"teid Uftdat _.the sugWviti7bn :af an acdus,tical engineer cesrtified . by the County of Orange. _ ._.XiFottia 41fa'11 -be s3ubMitted to -the 'Di.rdeztor '-of Commudity~ Development within three working days after the completion of each phase of the monitoring effect . The m_onitorirlg shall ficiude the fuilowing ; a . Ers-dril,lig_phf a MQ0it0ring, prior to the .start of the drilling phase-, - noisge measurements shall _be obta."ed .._- during the operation of the specific drilling Brig which has been selected and the measurements shall be related to k i6ie whi 6h will be experienced at"the nearesCri esidential. boundaries to tho drilling site . In addition. the noise control measures have been (or, will be) applied to thy, rig i as needed for compliance with the City of Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance shall he identified . b. Stalt_ - i�jg, Noise measurements shall be obtained dusting 'the nighttime hours ( 10 : 00 PM to 7 : 00 AM) for st least six hours on each of three nights within the fivn day period from the :- tart of the drilling phase . Monitoring Is to occur at the nearest residential boundary to the actual drilling operation. The noise level data shall I-,e compared to those specified in the Casty of Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance by the Department of Community Development . Whece an exceadance of the ordinance is identified , noise contxol measures shall be applied and an additional two nights of monitoring shall be required . Staff Report - 10/18/'88 -5- ds; , i 1 r � , • L r, �r nut c. . Noise monitoring shall occur of n a • x- hour period between the hours from10 : 00 PM to yt�q AX at levet once each month during the drilling phase of the project. The noise level date obtained shall he composed to the City of Huntington Desch ]noise Ordinance standards by the Department of Community DevBiQp"sit . More an szeeedance of the standards is identified* noise control measures shall be applied and an additional two nighty of monitoring shall bg required , - - 5 . Measures ' to -reduce-'arosi on, should 'be uled during grading and sits preparation, Grading and construction activity shall take place only during daylight hours after the .issuance of a grading permit by the department of Public Works . 6. During grading find excavation, earthmovi.ng crews should obedrve cuts and spoils for potential ar.chneological Finds . In the -event of a potential - find being located , . operations shad be a`uspended until the significance of the find is Set mi dd. . 7. A duet control program shall be submitted to the Department of Conaimuui'ty Developmer't for review and approval prior to the issuance of lauQdinq plrq� . UA S.ttleak �npxov.e nt,s . qr.. both..tra ta...s.h.a1,.1.. be-constructed after the hmv aredlim, operations have been completed j (approximately 4 weeks) : I a . Final grading, or &ny other on-site construction shall be i prohibited until street improvement conatruction has � commnenced . b. Prior to any on-site construction or drilling , the masonry wall and all landscaping and street i.mprovaments shall be installed subject to the approval of Department of . Community Development and Department of Public. Works . 9 . Prior to the installation of any landscaping , a landscape and Irrigration, plan shall be submitted to the Department of Community DAvelopment and Public Works for review and approval . a . All landscaping shall comply with Chapter 15 . 22 of the Huntington Beach ordinance Code and all trees shall be minimum 24 inch box type and spaced no greater than 20 feet on center . 1 10 . Prrior to the installation of the office structures, elevations shall be provided for review and approval by the Department of Convounity Development . a . The office shall be on a permanent foundation , b. A mansard or pitched roof shall be provided . I Staff .Report - la/la/Se (1453d) tr 1 n _.i �rl,w t 11. The applicant shall enter into a franchise agreement with the City for the installation of the underground connection betr#een the two blocks , if required. 13 . The, proper sealing and abandonment of the existing scattered w"Ils which will be replaced by this project shall take place following approval of this project and must be completed within eighteen ( 18) months . 13 . The surface of the site shall be completely cbve�red with an ... appropviate materlirl' (such air gfIvfel` and%or ens"phelt) subject . �. to rev;'.ew and approval of Public Works Department , Fire Department and Department of Cummunity Development . 14 . A report prepared by an acoustical engineer certified by the County of OLange shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development for review and approval prior .to G6imencing drilling . Said report shall describe noiLa levels at the Angus Oil Site property line and at the nearest built An-AwlinticAhe zepo rt - shall indicate noise attenuation measures Necessary to ensure . compliance with the Huntington Beach Noise Code . This shall include the provisions of the ordinance Code ' regarding_ maximum. _ . hourly average noise level at nearest residential property a 0E_. 50Aa(AJ during -nighttime. hours betwfeem 30:.00 -uN' ar,a - .-.� 7 : 00 AN. �.- a•. A. double acoustical blanket enclosure shall be provided at ratan-door entrances . 15 . Noise attenuation for the drilling operation , rail operation _,,.. _ .. .._,_.... and -service operation '-sh.4 rl be provided pursuant to the Oil Code and noise report 'specified in Condition 14 . ~ . a . 7f a noise violation occurs , the entire drilling structure shall be wrapped with an acoustical blanket for greater noise attenuation . 16 . The project shall fully comply with the Huntington Bench Noise oidinence. At the applicant ' s expense , a continuous calibrated meter shall be an site to monitor the decibel OF",) level with a printed copy to be wade available to City staff and Ad Hoc hocon Project Review Committee on a weeklir beads . 17 . No speakers , loud bells or buzzers shall be employed on site. 18 , Excessive vibration , as determined by the Department of Community Development, shall be reduced to acceptable levels . 19 . Light and glare shall be directed anti/or screened to prevent "spillages" onto adjacent residential properties and shall be energy efficient subject to the requirements of the Building Division . Staff Report - 10/18/as -10- ( 1453d) ago rink �,.'D. �' . + • , •� •IV 20. A11 heavy truck traffic shall be limited to the following streets between than 405 freeway and the subject site: Beach Sftlev8't!!, M8ms Avenue, and Delaware Street . For entrance to the 'sAte Only Springfield Avenue and California Street may be 21'., Heavy truck traffic shall be limited to the hours between 7 :00 a 04 5:00 PC a . no trucks may park on the street , .__b, .. __Taruck daliveries. .shall be staggered no that' no stacking " shall occur on public streets . 22 . All employees must park on either one, of the two sites . t Street parking for employeeai is prohibited . 23 . Local streets affected by truck traffic shall be inspected bei0te and after construct-ion . Any damage to local streets by heapv� tracks shall be repaired and reconstructed per City ' requirements at the expense of the applicant . 244 All driveways shall be radius type and constructed to Public Works standards . 25 . There shall be . no entrance or exit of vehicles from the I drillin* site hetwaen the hours of 10 : 00 PM and 7 : 00 AM except fore ealdt'gdim PPUTPOM . 26 . An overload permit should be obtained fram ,City and State ( if � required) for till o;4rsiaed loads" to be "moved on public streets . 27o Zi.pe stating cementing .through E.resh water-bearing-. .aandn shall, be implemented to prevent salt water intrusion into the 28 , A system for collecting , treating, and releasing storm drainage -shall be provided by the applicant and approved by public Works . 2%. Brine rater shall not be released into the . sewer system. 30. A racycliny plan of produced zone water back to the oil reservoiif shall bo certified by the Department of ail and Gas and the Ff a e Department and a l 1 its conditions and restrictions shall be adhered to . 31 . Well service rigs shall be operated no more than a total of 48 days per year bet ,peen 7 : 00 AM and 7 : 00 PM or daylight hours , whichever is shoLcer . :Staff Report - 10/18/86 - 11- ( 1453d) ,.; ': ,�a'. yr: �;6 „ • ,^,, o 1 �I i�MaaC . than four Drell $* vice rigs may br on the promises of tin Tho rearvioe rigs shall not raced :old feet in .... . 1402t, rt aid shad be double, muff lad and utilise acoustical b *Mots as dew "d nooessary. 64. .j;. ' 1143 AW-dfilling rigs and production walls shall be operated by electrical motors and electric pumps only. , 34 . The 24-hour phase drilling rigs shall not operate for any longer than 2 years from the issuance of the first drilling •pa�rlrti t . - • _ - •- 35 . Drilling rigs for remaining wells after the two year period shall eoft.ply with the conditions . Subsequent drilling shall be limited to 7 :00 AM to 10 : 00 PM only. 36 . drilling derricks shall not exceed 165 feet in overall height . . 37 . Upon completion of24 Ih7ours phase of injectio_Lpn and and producer all dr .1. in/y �Sh_M1L. 0v@ _ 1Y ..thlk . _..._r-, ... ,_ 38 . Service riffs shall be erected only during maintenance operations . i, • Apol cent shall install blowout prevention equipment , A full va�per recovery system shall be installed-as required by the South Coast Air Quality Management District . 41 . Only three on-site crude oil tanks are permitted and shall never be completely full at once . •�-4-2 r -prepare*--aril',- submit 'Ir Fralimi7iary�Emez�en y Action -plan (EAP) pride to - issuance of building permits . A completed Emergency Action plan based on as•-built plans shell. be completed and 3, submitttd., prior to the start of oil production operations . The Zmergehcy Action plan shall include employee training and peria&c practice, how spillage onto street from .sfte(s) would � .' be handled. (atockpile of sand, etc. ) , the safe lt:,�wdling of any chemicals and/ox materials , and full knowledge of all systems and emergency equipment . A copy shall be on file with the Fire Department and updated on a five year basis . In addition, a Spill Prevention and Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Man in compliance with City requ i rementc for handling of spills . etc . , not otherwise covered in the Emergency Action Plan shall be completed and filed with the City prior to the start of oil production operations . 43 . All oil must be transported by pipeline , Staff Report 10/10/08 -12- (1453d) p j: r' y v•. 34, LL d 44 , ho on-site fire suppression system shall be installed as a palm$ r: Sourge for "fire protection pursuant to Fire Departmsnt re�i re��t■. a 4*0 Collor requirements for oil wells : i i . J► h drogen sulfide detection system for the. well collars site i koi installed subject to Fire Department requirements . b . Fire extinguishers approv'ad by the Fire Department must be installed within 75 "fde' t of travel on--site. c. Provide metal open grate covers over top of well callers . 44 . Sfurage tank requirements ; a•. Must 'have pre -plumbed foam injection system metalled on ��.. s•11 .. rodoet •atotag'e t nk$ er d Zcccc� "_ rater atdrage tanks . _ . . _ �-- 4T . Site requirements ; ` a . A11•diiked sreas must have an engineered drainage iyatem, b. Foam Otorage area and foam quantity to be approved by Fire Oupartment . C . Fires hydrants to be located in areas approved by Fire � Department . A. Hydro4en 4ulf ide date6t ion sydre-i i- app=awnd Ty. Mre 06partment to be Installed on project perimeter . e. 10ire exti'nguiahers approved by the Fire Department must oe ,installed . throughdut the site. f . All gate openings must be 24 feet in width and installati.ori must comply with Dire Department Specifica'tie"n 403 44 . Well cellarg shall be maintained in a clean and efficient manner to prevent waste accumulation 49 . Twenty-one ( 21) abandoned wells have been identified within the project area which do not meet present day abandonment requirements . A contingency plan sha11 be outlined and submitted to the Huntington Beach Fire Department for review and approval with steps to be taken in the event that Leakage f ron any of theme abandoned wells finds its way to the surface . Staff 1Re0ort - 10/18/88 -13- (1453d) y I r • .4 J , •r 100 ' Prior to termtnati.on of the ail operation, a plan shall be T� submitted subject to review and approval of the Fire Department and Community Development Department, showing how the site shall be abandoned and restored to its closest natural state. 31. 'there Shall be no pipeline construction activity outside the site except between the hours of 7 : Cd AM and 8 : 00 PM, Monday through Saturday only. . 52 . The methodology of oil recovery for this project shall be limited to water injection only. Steam injection shall be prohibited . L3 . The operator shall at all times during the term of this use permit and any renewal or extension thereof , maintain in force an-insurance policy or policies insuring ,the operator,- - and as - additional insureds the City of tiuntington Beach, the City Council and each member thereof , and every officer and •in the � du&-course--of--hi-s - employment or in his official capacity, against liability or financial lass resulting from any suits , clairmr or actions brought by any person or per- sons, and from ,all costs and expenses of litigation brought against the insureds* in the afrount of not less than $5, 000, 000 combined single limit for _ w _. �1'ty DIJi r�-. t 6- arsons ar ci+�r�age�'Eo prapex�p,ai,nclUdicig (but not i i.mi tod to injury or damage from subsidence and rabound, resulting from the operator ' s oil drilling and production sotivities and operations incidental there:tn . Said policies shall provide that the insurance coverage shall not be cancelled or reduced by the insurance carrier without the City having boon given at least ten days prier written notice there1of Jhy such carrier . The operator shall not cancel or reduce said insurance coverage. At all times during the terry. .of, arse permit , -and any renewal or extension thereof , the operator shahs maintain on file with the City Clerk a certificate or certificates of insurance issued by the carrier or carriers showing that said insurance is in effect in the amount required above, and a copy of each insurance policy. If. the operator does not keep said irsur.anee in full force and effect , the City may obtain said insurance and pay the premium thereon, which shall then be deemed a debt owned by the operator ,-to the City. Any insurance policies procured by the operator hereunder shall provide than the insurance carrier Naives all rights of subrogation dg&inst the City. if the City obtains any policy of insurance hereunder , suds polic), shall include a waiver by the insurance carrier of all rights of subrogation against the operator . iiWE Report - io/18/ge -14- 114KIA1 C4 CF-Ctad i CF-E-Ca P--%V ZUNI= 4 RZ-0 1 CI) , • -0!1�:Ctil RA RF • C2t� r aoF-�-CD - 'Collo a 0 1 ! CF-E � a .�4 $ R2R2-0R2 R2 ILJLJ E � ~ Rt-a I!2-6 r. - t - CF—P R! RI RI Ri Ri -CO-4 soQ eII ••�. f G O a wr i ' R i In R! R I Ri -o W. s i ! • �' A�_ _ f y +k_ Rl i II! Ri RI • rC2 utim.KNOW �y I .• t _O -o ...� lolrr+ncr sr c i_ kl Rl Rl Al M C F-E CIFICzcu4op I/Upt]p" r MUNTWGTOK KAC14 PLAN KM I)IVISM :�" me,µ;•, i 7� 1 i i i 54 . Tire Pionsing Commission shall review and, if necessary, may "Gift' the conditions as not forth in this use permit, at the first re uler planning Commission meeting in October, 1989 , at f vat year intervals thereafter i and upon any change in Brae jp of the project which occurs between give,-year � Fdow ! provided that the phrase "change of ownership" as horein shall not include any sale or other transfer to a Wporat$on, partnership car other form of business 4 0;Vant6otion in which Alberta Natural Gas-United 'States and/or one or move of its shareholders or subsidiaries owns the controlling interests, or any sale or transfer, sb long as Angus .or one of its subsidiaries retains responsibility for the operation of the project . 55 , The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke this use permit if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington beach ordinance Code occurs . The City shall provide the propert owner: with notice in writing of any violation , stating -the City ' s basis for determining that a vi,ole'ti6ft has occurred . The property owner shall have a reasonable time to cuato the, violation before further action is taken . The City mak require the property owner with notice in writing to submit written documentation of actions taken to remedy any violation and may require monitoring or other procedures to be implemented in order to unsure that the violation will be cured . r,{ . 56. The-�i,A mber--pro jest review committee shell monitor the project during the drilling phase and semi--annually thereafter . The Fire Department and Community Development departments shell jointly provide a staff liaison . 57 . The property value protection plan submitted-.by the applizant: shall be implemented as outlined prior to drilling . 58 . In the event that either one of the two blocks is to he without 24-hour supervision, a video camera shall be employed on-site to provide continuous surveillance which can he monitored by personnel at the other site . 1. . Area map 2 . Site plan., elevations and landscape plan 3 . Previous findings and conditions of approval for Angus Project 4 . Draft Ordinance 5 . Compairiawn of Current and Prior Springfield Project 6 . Letters in support of project 7 . Letters in opposition of project SH: RLF; jr Sta'f f Report -- 10/18� ,� .�✓ - Y5� ( 1453d) -+nr-DIY ISh111111IW lf+f4/ � gun 00�. _ oc) qo to esp. . H r .+..+�r..rar�_.�1u1+.--•+%•IMF! � � �i i 1 . r . r.1. ' • I ' h i�t { wwwr'-.W.W.-AAAAW—ft".� u1 ANGUS PETROLEUM CORPORATION 0 SPR l NGP 1 ELD PROJECT v use' ,tom' ti4 I y r 1 k��' X,rt i h „r 11 1 I CALWORNIA STIIEFT m � - r •�r I Q 1 C' _ _ 1 _ _ ,r 1 � DELAMAR11 19TRt ET ANOUS rF.Tt1QlApUM holitro p-r i nm pPR t w7�' IIFI,I+ 1.1111./RC► :^ y own #IRl � I�,I��•Y ' f 6 FIhJ�Ir IN4TQN 1!►'1t�lT � �'� / 1 51.1, Z • � iM .rr � . ' 1 �� T��N•�MMN 1�1M� � 4 1. 1�140 • y, r � , � 1 .� i ' ••s•.. r. —.r•_. _..r•.r YY.M?Y�Y••II M••�Y NI.N „ � _ ,L r• Irr••+•.•�•F•M.--�. �wV•r•.��T.�I�..�.�..w�.��w�r er....•� CC� Tw •�• .err r .r•.•.M•.rrr•.r 'f4 CALIFORNIA 8*f f*Ee.T is Y.i ay,' yd• r a,7 r._ T.�+.,.��Y.rrrY.r�.r�.� r�rr.rrr�+ ",�A+VV'•' d ANGUS FETRQI._EUM CORPORATION ,1 SPR I NCF ! ELD PROJECT 1p •J w _ r . S+.ru-_ •' .-_. �.�_.—_ —�_—.�._— __ — _ __ __.—�� - .' --11. 1� � J ',�—,..'—' ^]M� Y�1� •,'f)`F'�,,'�'�1r i y 4 I � M N r. ! •i lM •. y � .. .O•� .. r T•� �� V ...•n��r . .•,yam.. I• w•. ram..•..n•.�.■r.��1 y}�� Q ry� •Q Z 7�, t 'S r r• .••.. •1 w VI in A73 in M V N A N r 1 •` In Z iILI in t M ANGUS PE■i'StQE...EUM CCinPORAT t ON W SPR i NGF Y EL D PROJECT I � r ♦��11 iF • F� hl.'yam,, r ,tw,:: do • ! w a' t" t+ , `t •' •�' v° ATTACHMOT 3 PRIE MUS FXXVINGS AND CONDITIONS OF I&PROVAL FOR ° ANGUH PROJECT X2 2 , 1987,p AND OC'TOBER 200 1986 CM COUNCIL RERVENG r n Ci unCi?� - •. �N US PRTRGLEUM CORPORATION -- ANNUAL REVISW � p . M X C T C NDITIONY- J PPROVAL TO USE MMIT' WT '- -API.JICATIONS TO AD HOC CMIRVE To Is ACCIFTED .. A Deputy City Clerk presented a comm&iicatior. from the Como aLty DevelopMent Director - transmir.ting for Council ' s consideration the rayutred annua: rey.,ew of Use Permit 86-7 - Angus patroieum Corporation pursuant '.o condition #53 of the condi,titons of ,approval and modif icati.un of five of the original conditions imposed on Angus petroleum Corporation''. Subject location is the two blocks bounded by DelawAre , H ntington , Toronto A Rochester . � The Deputy City Admi•nistrator/Community development presented a► staff report. Discussion was head regarding, the feasibili ty - of installing a ` fixed noise • monitor printed -read - out to -operate continuously with the reports. to be made available to officials •nd the Ascoh Ad HOc Cataamitteit . Discussion was held regarding Conditxon,' No: 41 'pertaining to the Emergency Action PIAn . The masonry Walle surrounding the site and the make up of the Ascon Committee was discusood . a ' , , 4 pay* 10 Minutes of Council/Agency 11/2/87 P; A X0tion r+ar made by Green , seconded by Marls , to modify aon4ition+a of approval of Use permit No . 86-7 as follows : condition l : The site plans dated October 20, 1987 shall be "—"� the ap+ roved project layout . Mo4tion 7 : Changed have been required and incorporatod in the project during the course of the public. hearing and con&ultation process to mitigate or t avoid the significant adverse environmental effects of the pro jectl the rivigion of Oil and Gas enforces rules. and regulations for the conduct of secondary recovery operational the ;. mitigation measures incorporated , proposed ana adoptea, together with application of the rules and regulations of the Division of ail and Gas . will effectively mitigite all of the adverse impacts identitiedl public agencies other than the City, including the Division of Oil and Gars , Regional water Quality Control Board ant!, �R - South Coast' 'Air quality Management Dictrict , will be reviewing aspects of this project for mitigation measures as to matters vri thin theirresponsibility and Jmri.sdiction , including subsurface operation , water and air quality; yt,. the critical need for oil renders infeasible the alterna►tivea of no project or delayed project implementation , ana alternative surface locations are infeasible because of their limited availability, oe the greater disruption � to the community at large which would result therefrom . Except the well cellar excavation a.: and construction be allowed to proceed concurrently with tiae construction of masonry } walls , .landscaping, and- street improvements , on 1. s , The' 'project shall tally .comply with the ` Hmntitngton Beach Noise Ordinance , At the 4pplicnnta expense a continuous Colibrated meter shall be on site to monitor the necibel ( dba ) level with a printed copy to be made *vailable to city staff and Ad ace Ascon Project itevi.ew Commi tt6e on ' & week.ly' basis . a +dIt_Jpn fJl r Prepare and submit a preliminary Emergency Action Plain ( CAP ) prior to issuance of building permits . A completed Emergency Action plan based on as-built plans shall be completed and submitted prior to the start of oil produ'ccion operations . The Emergency Action Flan shilll includc employee tr.aritiing and periodic practice , how spillage onto street from rite ( l e ) would be handled ( stockpile of sand , btc. .) # the sate handling of any chemicals acme/otc Materials , and full knowledge of all V { �.Y ` i5 L, page Minutes of Council/Agency - 11./2187 systems. and emergency equipment . A copy shell be on film with the Fire Department and updated on a five year basis . in addition , a Spill Prevention and Control and countermeasure ( SPCC) Plan in compliance with City requirements for handling of spills, ..c . , not . otherwise covered in the Emergency Ac%: , un Plan shall be completed and filed with -the City prior to, the start of oil production operations . CogdJ " 3: The City Council shall roview shut' if necessary , may modify the conditions as ee't forth in this use permit , at the ftrat regular City Council meeting following September 21., y 1988 , and at five year intervals thereafter, and upon any change in ownership of the project r which occurs between five-year reviews ; provided that the phrase "change of ownershipO as used herein shall not include any sale or other ;ransfar to a corporation , partnership or . other form at. buslkne$s- organization in which Alberta Natural Gas-United States and/or ane or more of its shareholders or subsid+"'ries owns the controlling •interests , or hny sale or transfer so long as Angus or and of it$ subsidiaries retains responsibility for the operation of the project . TOO motion carrisa by the fallowing roll call vote : AYR$ : Winchelil Mays , Kelly, graKine , Green Finley SNP:.. ginniaker Lout of the room ) Cook imformeo, .Council h;t,hat , 914 ri. s, posit-ton an the Ad floc Aacon Project Review it0.0 ware still bting accepted . f pgtion was Oe by Winchell , seconded by Wly , to amend �int� tlbn #5 to toad &a follows : � . . A nine me,mbor project review committee shall be selected by City Council to assure compliance with conditions of this use permit . th4 sot ian Carried by the following roll call vote : AY25 t Win6hill , Mays , Finley, Kelly, NrsKine, Green NOI&B s None s A2192NT: 4inr:ister (out at the room) s gguncilmae 14pnistetg1turned to the roori. Rr • I•; � .x to;,t 4 - Crtua mil Min, •-,�, 10/20/86 ' 1 AX86e gaily, K&W,lister, Finley, Mandic-, Bailey, Gruen, Thomas MORS t Bone AASBNT s lion• JOIN SPBCLAL NUTM $SHE >it1 10/27/86 - COUNCIUMEVMPOW ACBNrY A sott3n was made by Bailey, 9 eco4d+ed by Thomas, to hold a joint Spatial Meet- tq, ektc.ber 27, 1906 to consider all the Redevelopment Ageacy items scheduled w tb 'ba board October 20, 1986. The Faction carried unanimously. 4, • P 1C 0 lONTNG CO MISSION OVMULR.D - ZONE CfiA11G8 W4 - APMOVU r,• .. - - FINDINGS AD D$D CONDITION! -- )�� +� OLM 00RP The Molar announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing continued open from October 13, 1.986 to consider an, appeal filed by Councilman Jotia Thomas to the planning Commission' s denial of lone Chango 85-��, Uae Per r nit 66--7. Iona Chan$* 86-4 propoven a change of zone from "Oldtown Specific plan - Dis- ,_, _-tric:t 3r0" -ra "aldtown..Specifle plan - District 2-�01 ." . . lase Nrmlr 8E-7 - to devalap a c.qustlidated drillsite and oil operation. The subject location is two blocks bounded by Delaware Street to the east, HuntLngton Street to the want , Toronto Avenue to the north and Rochester Avenue to the south. The Mayor stated that fanvirovAental Impact Report 86-1 , aBaessing the enviroamen- tal effects of adid proposal Mould also be coneldereu by the City Council. The City Clerk announced that an informal petition had been submitted listing approximately 402 signatures in opposition and that communications in. opposi- tion had been aubmitted by James E. Walton. . Staff reports were presented by the City Administrator; the Director of bevel- opaant Services , Scott Hese, Assistant planner; Pam Posten, Assistant Planner; Jim Crtsp, Vice-President •of BCL regarding envirotmental. concerns; and Fire C'hiief ''Heard . Planning Commissioner Porter informed to Couacil as to the rea- j•oar ,vhj the P3anging Commission denied Zone Change 86-4 and dented Use Permit iscussion was held between Hayor Mandic and staff regarding phase 1 and Phase t i the project•; and the noise equivalant , Discussion **+afield regarding the time to be allowed for public testimony. S etstar Sheldon, Kgvta Williams, S. G. Williams , Edd Schofiald , Nick M rc an, ,Ta o Rohr L A,, , ;ad Ern*, Geo er Grundt, Kathy IGUer, Larry Washa , Me Frost, x. Halton, Crab, web , Mtcl,e Shafer, Steven Srr }lAnsea, Martha Rrotk, Jo a Van Haulau, Tom,Van Tull and Ki.rkk Kirkland, spoke in support G t e pro Jec t • . Stan Lawrence, l4o++ftt Richardson, Ulan AlbrL&he, Sharon Sarklaa, Ram an, Jasont R�o„sen, Paula Jtasto, Michael Crab, Dolores Walton, kno aM�.aasn, G. T. Lte, Nam, an presented certified copy of CC&R 'e, Peter a �All Cates., Luca dm battu, Michael Kaloi,tc, George Comm, Mark �..�. . Can?►,,,ear, Dirk Hartia4an spoke In opposition to the project. ti Dietcussian was held r _ding whetherto clove the p i.c hearing and codtiouc with the rest of the agenda. ' A Motion was made by Kelly , seconded by Bailey , to close the public hearing and to continue discussion of the matter at the present time . The motion car- ried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Kelly, MacAllister, Finley, Bailey, Thomas mots. Mendie, Green AAGEN'T: bona The City Clerk presented Ordluance No. 2876 For Council connideration -r "AN r O TMoes Of TU CITY OF XUN'T'INCTON B$ACH AKWING THI HUNTIJWjTON BF.ACM ORDI - r MUCE i:ODE BY AWDING SECTIOW 9061 TO PROVIDE FOR CHANCE- OF. ZONING MOM OLD- JOVK SPECIFIC PLAN (DISTRICT TWO) WITH OIL SUFFIX TO OLMWN SPECIFIC PLAN (DISTRICT TWO) WITH OIL SUFFIX FOR DRILLING PURPOSES ON LIAL PROPERTY OE - ALLY IQCATED BBTi EEN DEIAWALE SMUT TO TIE WTj EOCUST'Ett AVSt([UR TO THE SOUTH,CHANGE STKM TO THE WEST, AND SPRINGFIELD AVENUE Tp THE NORTH. - (ZONE C��ffNGE r 86-4)" • The City Attorney stated that CC&R' s were only enforceable between the private parties who o" the property. She Mated there waa an conflict of interest to disallow Councilman Thomas from voting on the issue. She referred to a letter Free► Angus Petroleum a,tating that there was no existi�as contract_ between Angus Petroleum, and Councilman Thomas. A motion was wade by Bailey, seconded by Finley , to uploold the decision of the Planning Commission and approve Enviroamental Impact R&urr. 86-1 , and deny Zone Chan& 86-4 with ,findings set forth in the October 1"s, 1986 RCA and to drtny . Use Permit 86-7 with revised findings a•s -set for'4h to the October 13, 1986, RCA. Following discussion, the motion failed by the following roll call vote: AYkS: Flnliq , Mandic , Bailey DOES : Xell'f, Macl,llister, Greeu, Thomas ASSENT: None A eotion was made by Green , secoodtd by Kelly, to cepcify )Environmental Impact Rx:port 86-1 as e�dequaote acid in� coniormeoce with C,elifut•nia Environmental impact Report. 'Guidelines and to overrule the Planning Commission decision and approve Zone lhange 86-4 sad Use Perait 86-7 with Eindi-aga and conditions as s"ade' d to ioclude optional Condition No , 35 pertaining to a five vember ravlew corm ttee to monitor and inspect the project ; Condi tlon No. 56 pertain- to the one mAllion dollstr trust, fund that' Angus Petroleum' Cor�pdration is p #tpared to eotsbliih per the letter from �zgua received October 17, 1986; Cdaditlon No. ►' pdrtaiaing to video camera scanning *-he drill site that can be, viewed by 144our security personnel at th( tank farm site ; and aeaeading CondLtloa No. 13, to charge tho vrrds to read " . . .SO dBA. . .", and to approve Introduction of Ordlaance No. 2876, after reading by title; the findings and conditions are ps follows : Fi Anga for &eproyal - Zone Change No. 86-4 : 1 . A change )f zone f'ro% "Oldtcwu Specific Plan, District Two-O" (Oil Opera- tions excluding Oil Drilling) to "Oldtown SFecifi.c Plan, District Two-01" (Oil Operitioao including Oil Drilling) w111 be compatible with surround- 133 i y { 4 V' Page 6 - Oouot it 1tLAu 110/20/86 r N I*$ yretaidential uses: aased on the mitigation meaourrs described in the eaviecoamental impact report and conditions of approval outlined in the use pearnit. 2. The proproseed zone change is cooeiscent with the goals and policies of the General Plan. Unitization sad consolidation of existing oil operations 4. is encouraged because it reduces the land area used for oil facilities . Approxim.etely 5.3 acres of developable Land will, become available after the consolidation on the two blocks (3. 1 acres) . 3. Cpapiiance with Title 15 of the Huntington beach Municipal Gone and the us*,,, peralt conditions of approval will ensure that the proposed use ''allayed by the zone change will nor be detrimental to' thb general health, welfare , and safety of the cemmuaity .. findinto for Uprovtl - Use Permit No. 86-7 : ` 1. The caraolishment, maintenance and opetation of the oil operation will not be; detrimental to the general. welfare of -persons residing or worklag �! !� is the vititLity, property and Improvements in the vicinity of such use or building based on the conditions 'of approval and compliance wish Title 15 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code . k` 2. The proptlaed oil operation is conelstent with the goals and objectives of the General Plsti . Oil activities are a consistent use in any land use ' catogory of the General plan. 3. The project will consolidate oil operacions in one location reducing -,the .. vleual iapao-t of -aumerous wells now spread througho-it the Springfield Oil Field aria. Such consolidation will also be advantageous for safety and � noise reduction purposes . The project will result in the abandonment and reclamation of 34 existing wells and 16 oil atorage tanks in the Spring- � field Oil Field area and will not significantly increase traffic in that area. 4 . . The projret will raault in increased tax revenue:e for the City of Hunt•- 3ngton Do4ch and othbr go veirnmental agencies. 5. T,he{. conditions of approval are desirable and necessary iu order to effeec- tuato the purposes of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code, the official General Flan Laud Use Flan aed the best interests of the City*' . Further, they includee ndtigatien meamurea set forth in the final Envirotme ntal Impact seaport thst wi11 4sourea • the location is aultable: for the type of mob ptro*ored and tM follovIng will not result, or be reasonably saticips- ;; ted free this projoete dasages or nuisance from noise, smoke, odor, dust or � vibratica; hasar4a from explosion , tootaaiezat.ion or fire ; hacards occa- sioned by vausual volumes or character of traffic; incompatibility with surroundiug development. And , the project complies with all requirements of Divislon 9 and other applicable proviaioos of the Huntington beach ftnicipal Code. 6. The condittoes imposed include requirements of plans for the dispositian of oil walls and for oil operations on the property involved , and for btarNS& . walls and landscaping to provide maximum feasible screening of eequiprent and .facilities. page .- Council Minute -- 10/20/86 7. Changes have been t.equired and incorporated in the project during the coure+s of the public hearing and consultation process to litigate or avoid the aiguiiicaut adverse environmental effects of the project; the Divialon of Oil and Gas enforces rules and regulations for the conduct of .- secondary recovery operations ; the mitigation measures incorporated, pro- posed and adopted , together with application of the rules and regulations of the. Division of Oil end Cae, will effectively aitigaze all of the adverse Lapacts identified; public agencies other than the City, includ- ing the Divisiou of Oil and Gas, Regional Water (duality Control Board and Sogth Cotst Air Qual:ty Management District , will be reviewing aspects of this project for mitigation measures as to matters within their responsi- bility and jurisdiction, Including subsurface operation, water sud air quality; the critical need . for oil renders infeasible the alternatives of no project or delayed project implementation, and alternative surface locations are infeasible because of their liait+ed availability, or the greater disruption to the co►nunity at large which would result. therefrom, S. the subject location is centrally located within the Springfield ail Meld are:a- ' relocating the proposea project to another site is iafeasibl.e . 9. No substantial public purpose would be served by denial of Use permit No. � 86--7 but rather; 1 (a) It is import,snt that the United States develop its existing oil reserves in order to meet its energy needs without increasing dependence on foreign oil, and this project will result in incremen- tal recovery of approximately five (.5) million barr+ela of oil.; and x (b) The project will consolidate ail operations in one lccacion, reduc- ing the visual impact of aumprc,us welle nov spread throughout the Oldtown portion of the City; and (c ) Such consolidation will also be arivantageoue for safety and noise reduction purposes ; and (d) The project gill be only an interim use—of the surface site involved, and at the tetohinatiiDn of 6'e project the site will, be avoilable: for recycling into other uses ; and (e) The project w111 benefit and accrue to the general velfa!-e of the City and the public for each of the reasons met forth above. (f) Approval of this project will reduce the Immediate demand for more off-shore drilling facilities. 10. The proposed oil consolidation project will have 24 hour on-site person- nel, and will' be safer than tha existing non continuous monitoring of the 34 scattered wells to be abandoned throughout the area. 11iis will reduce the poraible attraction o: younger persons . 11 . :he most modern, efficieer energy•-savi,ag equipment available will be integrated into the design of the project which will litigate envitormet- tal, isapacce such as fire , noise and air pollutants, o.4 y: ri 777 +.iA } p Council Minutes 10/20/86 y C The applicant has submitted a property value protection plan which will be lmpiemeated ae outlined prior to drilling. e Coo4tLons�of Ap,roval - Use Peruit No. 85-7 : 1 The site pl&u dated August 15, 1986, and section drawings dated August 27, 1986„ shall be the concepcual.ly approved layout. (a) This use peratit shall not become effective until. Zone Change No. 86-4 has been approved and is effect. 2. 111 structures and procedures shall conform to Title 15 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code and the Division of 011 and Gas Standards. 0 3. The applicant shall obtain all. necessary electrical and building permits. 4-. heesures to reduce erosion should be used during grading and site prep&- 6; ration. Grading and construction activity shall take place only during dayll.ght hours. 5. During grading and excavation, earthmoviug crews should observe data and spoils for potential archaeological finds . In the event of a potential find being located, operations shall be suspended until the significance of the find is determined . 6. A dust control program shall. be submitted to the Department of Develop- • went Services for review and approval prior io the issuance of building permits . 1. Prior to ariy on-site Zoustruction or drilling, the maaonry Vall aari all laodocaping and street improvements &hall be installed . e. Prior to the installation of any landscaping, a landscape and irrigatton _ plan shali be submitted to the Department of Development Services and ;. %blic Works for review and approval . (a) All landscaping shall comply with Chapter 15. 22 of the Huntington $each Crdinnoce Code and all trees shall. be minimum 24 inch box type and spaced .no, greater than 20 feet on center. 9. prior to the installation of the office structure, elevations shall be provided for review and approval by the Development Services department . (a) The office shall be on a permanent foundation, (b) A mansard or patched roof shall be provided . 10. The applicant shall enter into a franchise agraevent with the City for the installation of the uadttground connection between the two blocks. 1.1. The proper sealing and abandorsArent of the existing scattered wells which will be replaced by this project shall take place following approval of this project and must be completed v1thin eighteen (18) months. . 136 _ _ - '•�• . . ps e $ r.0MC11 Minutes 10/20/66 b 11. Tb►o geylae• of the site shall be completely covered with an appropriate sear (much as gravel) subject to review and approval of Development $,�rriaso. 13, A report prepared by as acoustical enSineer shall be Pubaitted to the ;•�, ospartrast of Development Services for review and approval' prior to code- SOac sg Ar1111 fald report •hall predict and project d3A sound levels Mt t uo al1 ate property line and adjacent residential, property It • both V.1th and withoutan acoustical blanket on the dril.linS rig sod service ri�a. The report shall indicate noise stile ' tiou measures necsasary to assure compliance with the Nuntinoton Basch Noise Code and a maxima noise level at the residential property line of 50 d8A during the E: night�ima hours between i0:00 PH and 7:00 AM. A double acoustical blanket enclosure shall be provided at man--door entrances. 14 . Noire attenuation for the drillIMS operation, . oil operation and service 1 operation shall be provided pursuatr to the Oil Code and noise report specified in Condition 13. Er . (a) If a noise problem occurs, the entire.. dri'.ling structure shall be wrapped with an acoustical blanket for greater noise attenuation. 1S. The project shall fully comply s1th the Huntington Beach Noise Ordluatice, Y, 16. No speakers, loud bolls or butters shall be employed on site. ,00 l7. Excessive vibration, se determined by the bi,rect.or. .of Development Ser- vices , shall be reduced to acceptable levels. 18. Light and glare shall be directed and/or screened to prevent "spillage" auto adjscant rooLdential properties, 19.. .:-JlU heavy truck traf fie shall- be--limited to the f ollbWiNg. afteeto GTieen the 45 freeway and the subject site : Beach Boulevard, Adams Avenge, and Delaware Street. For entrance to the site only Spriugfleld Avenue and :. Californie Stvast My ba. used. 20. Truck traffic shall be limited to the hours between 700 AM and 5:00 PM. (a) No trucks Isar park on the street . (b) Truck deliveries aball be staggered so that no note than two trucks shall Won the praatsom at any one time. 21. All esployeAs :oust park on either one of the two sites both during con- struction and after. 11. Local streets affected by truck traffic shall be 1nspe,�4i.,;ed before and after construction. Any daaage to local streets by heavy trucks shall be 7 repaired and recousicruated per City requirestents at the eapanse of the � appll,cagt. 13. All drirev*ys Shall.-be V44148- type and- constructed to PvbIle Works stars- - dards. oi k ; r ' Pegs 10 - Council Minutes 10/20/86 . 4' fib. 7hcre shall be no entrance or exit of vehicles from the dvri.11ing site beetvoen the hours of 10:00 PM and 7:00 AM exnept for urgency purposes. 25. An overload peetait should be: obtained from City and State (if r:etquirerd) for All oYersised loads to be moved on public streets. 6. pipe strLAd ssg*nti.n4 through fresh water bearing sends shall be imple- gerttsd to preitar. salt Mauer intrusion into the aquifers. i 27, A •7Mt faF aalleetJog, troating; and rel.eA.slo4 storm dr:Aa.,:,,r suit be proyided bar t4s applicant and approved by Public Works. Y 28. 8zcema brine must be treated and a permit obtained, to meet Orange County 8aaltation District and City Fire Department standards prior to being released into the sever system. 19. Recy4ling of produced 'zone water back to the oil reservoir shall be cart- ified by -the Regional Water Quality Control Board and. all its conditions ;'. and restrictions sh411 be adhered to. 30. Well service rigs shall be operated no more than 48 days per year between 7:00 AM and 7:00 pM or daylight hours, whichever is shorter. 316- No more than four• well service rigs may be on the premises at any oast rise, The service rigs shall not exceed 100 feet in height and shall be double snuffled and utilize acoustical blankets. • 32. All drilling rigs and production wells shall be operated by electrl.cal motors avid electric paaps only. 33. The drilling rigs stall not operate for any longer than x years daring Phase Oue. ..� 34. Dri.11ing rigs after the two year period for the remaining 16 wellm (Phase Tiro) sh&11 comply with then conditions herein and nay not be installed f � after an addMoual .two • ynarrs. The second phase drilling shall_ba limi- ted to 7:00 AM to 10sOO PM ouly. 358 Drilling derricks shall not exceed 1.42 feet in height. 36. Upon complexion of initiol drilUag of injection and producer wells, all. drilling rigs shall be removed from the site. f 37. Service rigs -shall be are:cted only during malaterance operations. 38. !ppl I cant shall install blowout prevention equipment. 39. A full vapor recovery system shall be installed . 40. Only three on-site crude oil tanks are permitted and shall never be com- pletely full at once. 41 . Prier to issusace of building permits, as emergency action plan, includ- 07F ins etaploye�training and pert odic practice , ahall be developed by the +• . . applicant with consultation from Lire City and other reigulating agarclos. The plro should Luclude how spillage onto straat from aite(s) wavdA be `r�'��T�tr �n� • •{,. , ... Try.. __.. .. „ , . - �., r , �• .. r id I r C)OUMriJL KiDut. 10120/84 ha ge ba led (stacrkpile of ""I eta•. ) ; the safe handling of say chemicals and/or votexsalg. *ad full knowledge of all systems and emergency equip- vent. A copy ahail be on file with the Fire Department and updated on a five year ! �r baste. i 41. All oil must bo transported by ;pipeline. ioppression system shall be installed as a primary source rot ts�� s' 44. r1ar xrgpireitnte fo►r all walls: (4) Muat be provided with heat de=ectioa system from teller to 24 hour wouitoyriag Location. (b) Fire exti%ipishers approved by the Fire Department must be installed within 75 feet of gravel, (G) Provide metal open grate .covers over t.ip of well cellerm. 45. S xg1raae. tame requi rsmont s: _ (4). Must have p;e-plumbed form injection system installed on all product storage tanks. Cb). Mint have, exterior.+deluge water spray system on all storage tanks. OR 46. 51 te, irequiremevis (a) All diked areas, must have an engineered drainage system. ' ( b) i" sm st:ora$* area and foam quantity to be approved by Fire Depat cM meta ( c) Pirt hydrants, to be -Located iri areas approved by Pire Department. (d) MydTagen 0414de detraction system approved by Fire Department to be installed ' oq ,Vroject perimeter. (e) Fit$ Oxi4aguishers approvi'd by th+e Fire Department suer be installed chtau;#"t.,F,he site. be .e4 ,fact in width and instillation &4s c :3:epV With 01ro DepY.rtwlut Specifleation 403. "t 47. Well, c* Is SWI be cleaned periodically to prevent waste sceumulation. 40. Twosty (20) abandoned wells have been 1deatified withiu the projoct area i M,140 de Bert meet present dry aWndonment requirements. A coAtinstucy ilAft A411 be ovtX1044 and submitted to the Huntington leach Fire Depart- moot for review and approval with steps to be tAMQ ia the event 'that leaksfe from any of theme abandoned vclls finds its Maur to the surface . 49- Wox to ttxve hatlon of the all operation, a plan shall be subeitt:ed' tab•- a to review &ad apptwval of the Fire Department and `Develop%eat �ar-� 414 lit" tt"Ui t. rhor<irg hart the site shall be abandoned and rsstored to +�r piesert matarta�: tat** 139 a' 4 drlA' � ! � R 0 .. '' Nor.,,' 0•i �.: y �W,,,,.w• [rage 12 Council. 'Hinutes 1.0120186 , 511. There shell be no pipeline construction, rctivity gutoide the site except between the hours of 7 :00 AM and 0:00 PM, Monday through Saturday only- 51. The methodology of oil recovery for this project shall be liaited to water injention only. Steam iajection shall be prohibited. .52. The operator aroill at all times during the tars of this use permit and any rewaval or a:tenat,ya thereof, maintain in ford 4a lasurancR ohley or policies insuring the operatot , and airaddi.tionai. o.nsv>`eds the Katy of ' Humeingto-. Beach, the City Council and Lath member thereof , and eery a€Cicur and employee of the City actiag to the due wourrie- of his employ- went or in hie official capacity, against liability 6r 'flcanclael loss resulting from auy aults, claims or actloas brought by any person or per enact and from all costs and axpenses of litigation brought against the 'nsureds, iu the amount OF not less than $5 ,000, 000 combined single limit. for slay 1n jr;ry to persons or damage to property, locl+ diog (but not limi- ted to) injury or damage from subsidence and rebound; resulting from the operator's oil drilling and productions activities and operations inciden- tal thereto. Said policies 3ha11 provide that tees; insurance coverage shell not be cancelled or reduced* *by the insurance earner without the Ctty having been given at least Gen days prior written notice thereof by such carrier. The operator shaft not cancel or reduce ^aid insurance overage. At all times during the term of this use permit , and any renewal or extenslon thereof, the opera:oir shell msintain on file 41th the City Clerk a certificate or certificates of aysurance iasued by the carrier or carriers shoving that said Insurance is ira effect is the aMOUML required above, and v copy of each insurance policy . If the oper- ator does not keep acid insurance in full force and effect, the City may obtain said irtsurs ace ,'.nd pay the premium them►ou , which shall then be deemed a debt owned by the cperator to th;a City . Any iusuratnce Folicies procured by - ehe cperevor heraiinder shall. provide than the ina,.urance car-- rier waives mill rights of. eubrngation. against the City. if the City obtains any policy of insurance hereunder, such policy , shall include a walvar by the insurance carrier of ail rights of subrogatian against the T 5a. . •The. City Cquucil, shall review sod , if nacsseary , may aioelify the condi.- clans as set forth In this use permit , at-, the fixart regular City Council meeting following' October 20, 1987, ana at ;Five yaar intervals there- after, ana upon any change in ownership of the project whi-A occars between five-year revie%s ; provided that, the phraion "r;:jkrge of own4rehip' as used herein shall not include -say sgaln , or other trauster to c corpora- tLop, ;4artnerahlp or other forty of busl► os organization ir+ which Alberta Hatui ral G4s-United States acid/or, one or more of its shareholders or sub- oLdlaries owna the contr'ailing interests, or any sale or transfar to long at Angus or one of its -.:ubsidlaries retains resporaeibIlity for the opera- tion of the: project . 54 , The P,launtng Comminsion,'City Council reserves the right to revoke this use permit if -any vialation of these c-)ndlriona or the, iluntingtan Beach Ordlaances Code occurs. 55. A five member review committee :hall be sklected by the Katy Couac;il care- prised of three property owuara,, •-ho IC:.ectly adjacent to the pro- ject e'te, one deaber of the r 'anniag Coamisslor. and one "City Courach essrrr r, 74%4, Fire Department and -Developoear Services lh,psrtmant sh&12 .rII1G, Yalta 13 Cc)I;l�c�.1 riiuutc.., 1U%�U/f�fi 'c�.li�cly prov;idr, et fiLaft l..talsoll . The puz•pose of this r_dmmittee 011811 be co wouiec,t aaLi i.ntpect the project oo a quarterly baoin during the drill- ing phamt. and semi-annually thereafter . G, !'he prop!!t-ty value protection plan eiubmitted by Che appl9cant mall be itmplemeni-ed as outliaed prior c_o (17:1111n8 . { 57. In the. event that eithe► one of the two blocks is to be without 24-hour supervision a video camera shall be employel on-site to ' proviue ccnti.ntr- ous survellfaucc which can to moniLur.ed by personutil at Hic other site Finding for ICU a�_I. EuvitonAeatalImp e.t Reportr86--1. : 1 . The Final Environmental impact Repor'. wao prepared is com' liance With the Cilifor.ni.s Fnviroumental Quality Act aad the State CF.QA Guidelines . 2. The Final Envirnnnente,l Ympect Report is an informational document which inforued tha Cit; Council and the genersl pu'lblic of the environmental effectL of the project Pad Which wan read, reviewed and considered by the, Cicy Council before making .iza decision on the prnJect . The Final Environmental Impact Report contains discussions of tha signi- ficant eaviroamental effects Which cannot. be avoided if the project is implemented, mitigation meamures proposed to minimize the significant effects, alternatives to the project , the relationship between local shoot-term usea of the environment and the maintemr:ce and enhancement of tosg-ters productivity , statements of significant irreversible environ• mertal Caavgea which will result from the project and the growth-inducing � impset of the action. 4 . The final. Environmental Impact Report contains the comments 'and recom-- nendationa raceived on the Draft Environmental Impact Report a list of persons , organizations and public asencies consulted and commenting on the Draft Environmeatal Impact Report , and espoaRes to significant � environmental questions raised in the review and conaulta*ion process , a motit s of completion 'of the Final Environmental Impact Report Wes filed with the Secretary of the Resources Agency as required by law. R. Siace completion of the Final Environmental Impact Report there have been uo substantial changes in the proposed project , or in the circumstances uader which the project is to be undertaken, or new iaforaMt+onr which require its revision; the :"anal- Environmental Impact Report is therefore certif led as.. c6:apleta Thy Aotio►. carried by. the following roll call vote: AYES -. Ke11y, MAcAllister, Creen , Thomas NotS $ Finley, Mandie, Bailey ABSCHT: Nose The Mayor called a recess of Council at 11 : 20 P.M. The meeting was reconvened at 11: 25 P+Mir 1 OF., -.iIANCE NO. DRA AN ORDINANCE OF TILE: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 9061 TO PROVIDE FOR CHANGE OF ZONING FROM OLDTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN (DISTRICT TWO) WITH 011. SUFFIX TO OLDTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN (DISTRICT TWO) WITH OIL SUFFIX FOR DRILLING PURPOSES ON REAL PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN DEL;%WAnE STREET TO THE EAST, ROCHESTER P-Vrt,IUE TO THE SOUTH, CALIFORNIA STREET TO THE WEST, AND SPRIL -IF'IELD AVENUE TO THE NORTH ('LONE CHANGE CASE N i--11) WHEREAS , pursuant to State Planning and Zoning 'Law , the Huntington Beach Planning Commission and Huntington Beach City Council have had separa-.:e public hearings relat:.ve to Zone Case No . 88-11 wherein hot;h briies have carefully cansiCeind all information presented at said hearings , and aftex due consideration of the findings and recommendation of the Planning Commission and all evidence presented to said hearings , the City Council finds that such zone change is proper and consistent with the General Plan, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does ordain as follows : SECTION 1 . The following described real property, generally ` known as the full block bounded b; Delaware Street to the* east , Rochester Avenue to the south, California Street to the west . and Springfield Avenue to the north , is hereby changed from Oldtown Specific plan (District Two) -8 to Oldtown Tpe(A fiC Plan (District Two) -01. : Tract 12747 being a subdivision ')f lots l to 20, inclusive , in Block 1804 of the Vista Del Mar Tract, Huntington beach as recorded in Book -4 , Page 15 of the Miscellaneous Maps of Orange County; CA . SECTION 2 . Section 9061 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. District ' slap 2 (Sectional District Maps 2-6-11) la hereby simanded to reflect they change contained In this ordinance and o-&& the reap attached hereto . The Director of Community Development is hereby directed to prepare and file an amended map . A zopy of said OA.4trict map, an amended, Shall be available for inspection in the Office of the City Clark. I DRA 1 SECTION 3 . This ordinance shall take offect Lhi rt;y clays after its passage . PASShD AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a Terular meeting thereof held on the day of _ _., 1908 . Mayor ATTEST; APPROVED AS TO FORM: I City Clerk City Attorney REVIEWED AND APPROVED: 1NITIATED AND APPROVED: -- City Administrator Di*:ector of Community Developm3nt M ( 1453d) 1 rs i r' j, 1. a a. .-Pilo t. 1 1 SHELDON CONSUIXING SERVICES , vn 5eac!iff iffire Park 2134 Main Street, Suite 2P5 Huntington Beach, California 92648 714, 536-1437 Government Relations + knwironmental Regulations o Project PerrnitIt'g' ''" AL►,Iust 12 , 1988 Mr . Bob Franklin Department of Development Services City of Huntington Beach � 2000 Main street Huntington Beach , California 92648 Ike : Comparison of Current: Springfield Project- to Prier Project Dear Bob : Yo,a requested that Z compare the features of, the current Spi•ingf i ald project with those of the original proposal . This letter attempts to list the significant changes . They include : JDQ; jL.Q ,.ip Q.i.1.. Racpygry - Oil recovery was originally `. estimated- at approximately 5 mi'1.ion barrels . Fur char engineering has allowed that estiinai.:e to be increased zo approximately 9 million barrels . ,Yisioil og Site klar,.1 - The site plant., for the project are --- row d-iffere'nt-.- t-han-..oriiginally proposed . They are the same , however , as the site plans approved by the City Council on November 2 , 1987 as a modification of Condition #1 of use Pe-unit No . 86 .7 . The basic features of the revised site plans are: pfil a Ug: The well cellars have been downsized to a maximum cf• 4 5 wells rather than the 60 wells included in �.he originally approved layout . � Faci1i—ty _ alto-; The overall interior grade has been lowered two feet: below street grade in order to reduce tank visibility and provide greater water retention Capacity. (The elevation of the oil handling tanks is therefore lowerad to six feet below street grade . ) The water handling tanks and equipment: were reoriented into the area previously occupio-d by a< residential etaructure at the northwest corner of the site . That modification allows two smaller tanks to be substituted �', &daft.+. .1 ,. •.1 for the jingle large b* ins water stoc:age tank . The separate tanks are four feet lower in height than was the single tank . The above modifications resulted in a minor relocatior. of both driveways WE Huntington Stre:e`: and California Street) and gates in to the facilities site and office . izik&&n ar(Aiiop, - The original Elk included an. estimates of the ma:wi,mum number of employees and contract �iersonnel based on the poss1bi.lity of using two drilling rigs simultaneously. The current proposal is for the use oC only one drilling rig . The required personnel and resulting cri_p generatlon has been reduced accordingly . ;&UM► ,ot flak$ - u2 Watei - The prior project was to obtain ,bria,e water for initial injection and as make - up water in the pi•uduct:ion process from either new brine water source wells or from excess water from existing o 1 production activities . The sources of the necessary injection water has now beer, determined to be surplus brine wa,rer available at Chevron 's water treatment plant located near Clay Street west of Goldenwest Street . The brine water to be used in the Springfield project is now being disposed of by discharge in to the sanitary sewer system. Mtj D"Oo A The original project conternpla ted that I.ertaih surplus waters including storm runoff and surplus produced water might be disposed of , as required , by discharge into either the sanitary t:ary sewors or by permit to the stormdrains . The current project has been modified to be a "zero water discharge" facility. The project will c6ntaJ'.n or capture all waters on- sits including : maka -up water; produced water ; storm runoff ; and/or fires fighting water . After filtering and treating any such waters will be injected in to the subsurface reservoirs . Well as:d Tan? Ada dgnin z%tQ The prior project pro\,ided for the abandorunent of 25 oil wells and 9 tank batteries . The current project provides for t;ces abandonment of 21 wells and 7 tank batteries . The difference in as a result of the wells and tank batteries that have already been abandoned eithu' r by ANGUS Petroleum Corporation or other party in conjunction with the prior project. .I have aetteateed to include all the significant dif fesre3r.cess between the currently proposed Springfield Project and the prior project . If any others come to mind , t will be certain to call them to. ., your attention . pleaoe '!%�t me know if e:y further information on theses changes is need&J at this time . { I: chink you'd agree with me that all the above changes h eitbar reduced project impacts or have otherwise provided for ! improvem nt in an environmental aspect of the project . ! I Very t ly yours , / V Sp c C. Sh don CSC / CC; Mr . John D. Carmichael I U 1 CER I IFIED PUBLIC ACCC JrgTANT C . G 00. 1805 CALIFORNIA S FHEF.1 N U1L r,M .� t;',Ci11�~ HUWiNGTON BEACH, CALIi 111NIA 91646 7 141538•?534 The ilunor "Iblu Jelin r-xskine 74/5 hklyol' Ut 11untj n ton 13vach AWRICAN6WItUIEUFCPAs ( i L Y 11.11 : CALIFoANIA SOCIE I CF CPAS 2.000 ,Ma -, n w L ree t LICENSED 11 1J 11 I I n g L o n 9:�b(18 CAL190FINIA AND PENNSY1 VANIA 51'1+ INC;F 1 1-:'U) 1'Itoi Eur 0)y An4us 1�ctrc> ] c��r1n Cart!oration ) [)cell- Mayor E.rr.kine : A.s you car. see from out, address above , we live and work dirc (: Lly across the street from the proposed Springfield Nro,jec: L . We ' re writing to 1 e t: you knew we want to .see the project go ferward As soon a pnwsitrle . ':7 t ura 1 l y , we a • ..:onaerned wi •' h safety , noise and property VZO LICA , but we Angus Pe t rnl eum is responding to those C01)C0rn.1; . In your aelib��rati,ons we request :hat thli project be %%proved and that i V. include Lhc-i fnl. lowing provisions : Compliance with -all safety wt-andards . -Completion of strect:s iLnd side-walks as; a priority . I•Comple+ tion nf landseaping and permanent wall ( high enough to block any unsightly view from a second• story window ) . -Soundproofing Ln#--dust•---control, dut•ing•• dri",1-1•i ng.-=-phase •Springfie1d ProI,erty Trust ( as previou51y proposed ) . A:<1 you may know f r•om Correspondence or. file , we initial ly upposed thi:•; project . However , we subs quently reconsidered and (.hanged our position . This , therefore , gives you the right to charge your mind , too , since you ran your- campaign opposing I.hs Springfield I'rojert . At tiny rate , 1) 1.ease undo>rst .and , that the "Concerned Citizens" group does noL speak for u,t . IlC4'ro 11, 00. M JAAa Boyd D. Wheeler Linda L . 11•hcoler Cc : C i tyl Council Alembers 0., City Planning Commissioner & Members Angus Petroleum Corporation Davin Convey) tant:; 0 1ne . Editor , `t•aange County Register I C,? 9 jd a r-,'ox oka i Dr . Huntington Beach , Cal . 92646 September 20 , 1988 The Honorable J chn Erskine , Vayor of Huntington Deach , Gear Mayor Erskine : Upon discussing the case of the Angus Company petition to consolidate their wells in a one square block area which would be camotafla,ged' and noise monitored , it seems to me , in view of the na iort-wide search for new sources of oil , the petition should be given serious thought and fair consideration, it appears to me that if safeguards are taken to insure the fulfilment of company promises , the pr.oposed develop - ment would be a good deal for all concerned - including an added source of' revenue for Huntington' Beach . The sewage treatment plant , .,the Ediso�i generating .plan-# and the Ascon Jumbo are all close to my home , but these things have not ruined the beauty or serenity or :towered property values of my neighborhood. Sincerely, w 6� Don Van Sickle ?L RECHVED :CtY.1i`(W HUNTINGTON KACH CITY, COUNCIL OFFICE 1 I I 1{I I 262 Cranadn Avenue Long Beech , CA 90803 : = Gct:ober 6, 1988 Chairman Victor Leipzig and Planning Commission Members 111intin;gton Beach Planning Commission 2UM Main Street Huntington, Beach, CA 92648 Dear Chairman Leipzig and Planning Commiani.on Members: This letter is in regard to a Planning Commission hearing on October 1.8, 1988. to consider a proposal by Angus Petroleum Corporation to develop a secondary recovery program on the old eastsidte town lot oil field. Studies over the past several yearn have shown that a large amount of recoverable oil remains in the formations of that field. Cu:r•er.r se ondelry recovery methods could extract .millions Lf barrels of good quality oil. The long-term -benefits of this program outweigh the Short-term inconvenience that may result during the construction of facilities. The resieents in the immediate vicinity will be able to enjoy two blocks of landscaped open apace. Residents within the laaee area will -bonefit from- the reMOVAI -of iwany unelghtly. _ oil Melts and storege tanks. The City of Huntington Beach will receive additional revenue from the project. Considering the recant reduction in oil exploration s activities and the abandonment of many producing wells in this country, we may again in the near future fired oursalvea at the h' merty of the OPBC nations. We should develop our oil reserves ' ow and -nest writ for the next shortage crisis to occur. r encorrage' you to grant developmut permits to Angus Pttroleva Corporation within limitations established by your }5 . city Govirap Wit tal planners. . �Arhrcerely yours, Bdverd W. Tuck , - 1 j } T 4 ' _ i ' Jo r � ¢s K��;: # �'��d Co. e', d`✓+c� �r� f► vt et 9 1 r4�1 . . '?na o AA. I w t-a env- . I . H-J N r l ,4 4'MA r8 eONC N CA 91 ` 4 S3 �.r Y`rl k_�.r �K1�� .a+a•��► � M t..►,bcR � ,. b -"1 N fob ~fit 14'Y`�r��c 4 4ti4cr '1�►i4PL �ZALa Vail +4%crti cLrc. ov%sry. e, r.43 k.�i r,.ra S4 I1I u c. i i C'.hcer T- kgoe i .: 1m 4 rt S•J&141114 I C1 � b+`kabA -waa be e.- do-4Pi rM �•y VO S car l� f`gig *s+ -Hwk.1. 60 4,j U 0"im- �n st- f � r10 e of l 1 .u. Goau ,e Carry 1301 CriliIfornia Street I„ I Y 10811 811 111r1 litJ011' 13?a(- h , CA i Mayor Robert Plandi.c ri cy COMIC r•t.:,n1)cr .s CITY 01" HUN'l'1Nr'rON 11f?ACH 1.00(, 1,lain SCr 0 P. t 11tai) tingcon Beach , CA 92 46 1)ear: Muoyc) r Mann ic. & Counc i 1 `Members , illy ��r,,:se r :; C�:nr� ,c? Curry and I ain �� horir�owner at the above stat.eA .ncIdcess . My ne i ghbo vs and I a t7a ve ry concerned abou t a pro j ec t w17ich wL1. 1 be tip tar. review by the P1ann1ng Commission �oinetime in September , 1'his project is being proposed by Angus Oil Co . which wants to drill 50 - 60 new oil wells over a period of two ( 2 ) years . Angus Oil Co . has purchased two blocks of land , iti which there are appro,ximatcly six homes on presentl.,y . 'I"his pcuposed cirill site is located between Callforbia Street and Delaware , Rochester and Springfield streets and .is surr:M)rl led by residential. homes urn three sides . The value of the project is in the range of $25 , 000 , 000 . 00 . 1 have been watt hi.ng the City of Iltttllir.gton ;3eacli develop and [ like vha t has been apprnved , however , tFlere seems to he no way that a pco juc L of this nagn i tude could be constructed and riot have an effect on the neiyhborhood . T have just recently received the Covi .ronmental Tirpact Report and I are concerned about a fc:w thin:ys ill Which I would like YOU to revieo and consequently , t espoiid to ; A) Dri. I ling noise for o period of one, - ( 1 )- Lo two W.- years using a 1 , 000 horsepower elect:ri.c wotors for twenty- four ( ?4 ) hours a clay . Will you guarai: tee us that this drill. .ing oporat. ion will glut be a nuisance? The EIR report is not � detailed enough i,i regards to the effect the noise level wi 1 I. have on the surrounding resiclepce , especially at night . .*law ebnut limiting t►—^ dri. l, ling per to day time hours only . � ff ) Maintenance of the wells . This will occur after the wells are contpLated . Lets gay they have 60 wells that need 'to t)e c lectiac! two t ifnes a year . - This o e ra t ion takes approx ima to 1 y twu days her well , which equals 1 �0 days otlt of the year: a pttl. l. ing t71g will be operating . on the sii*te creating noise . llerKaps you can request that trey insulate these hulling rigs even tho�igh the actctah work occurs dt4Vittg the daytime hours . What about the neighbors that work out of their . homes , have daytime boardaIrs , and the poople that work at night , w111 this noise rrea,t:e a nuisance in their case? continued . . . 1►�cw':.'_547: ... ....tiF.., ..., 1rc ..--- ------L--.�.._.... ---.....a --..r.ubsra_ !III y .301 19J0 '1I.1yor mandic C,i L y C,oIinL i ) hier11)CI- S 11r1�e Two l know LhaL ,i I)ul. 1. ing rig will. exceed the City ►10 ;_se Ordinance if uel- insu is Led . Please rest)ond on this with your views - One option is to I imi t thy: amount'. ^ [ we11s Lo be d'rULed which in EUU11 will. (Ir.crer3se the maintenance c; ) ne1)r. eciati. on n [ the hocies_5nrroundiri&an i.nr,ustrial cite . r,•- jits t I)u CF-ha se. my k its t hori.� and n�;� co�icr�L,ne�tC;�a t i an emerpricy was to occur and T had t.o seLl my home , how WOULd potential. buyers [ eel about buying a home surrounded by drilling rigs operating 21+ hours a day? Would you buy .3 have a- ross the street f ron a project like this ? 1) ) Zonilig This land is currently zoned as "0" which expressly pro L �.tts ncw .ciiA1lin o,1erati.ons . 'ro ;allow this project to proceed ,, the City has to , re- zone this avea . The zoning %,as al.so writ ):en to pr. otec : L'he residcnti al. area from new wel. l. drilling . How c•ar% you allow this in a residential area which has been zoned Err residential units, what good is zoning if you change it awl rho. tine? It was initially zoned "%')" to allow the Existing wells I o continue pumping which is fair since they have been here many years . Ej Aesthetics . The EIR repoct states nut homes are 10 to 15 years old . My holile is only 7 years old . Will the block wa 1 1. sucrUundina the site blend or semi m-i tch each type of housing feature? The. homes slung California 5ttr,�et lbetween _ Rochest'e.r and Springfield 'Dave bricK fa�r,ades , will this block f Nall have brick incorporated into its ' design? The landscaping around the aite needs to be well maintained , bond should be posted to insure this . We suggest that you take a dri-,,c: by out homes , and take a look at them . F ) :et hacks . The standard set back for a residential home is 7 eet . Since this is ar industrial use , wouldi7 ' t you tend to wee -hat set backs ;hnuld be larger then 15 feet which wou Ed allow a larger buffer none between the site and the residence . It would also decrease the possibi 1 i t ies of aucideist• s . Tt must be noted that those rigs sCar~d a few hundcad feet in the air , and it a+l accident did occur , it would effect the residentz . � C ) Alt rnative sites . I would propose that thiy dr•Ul near the Civic CentaF w ch is a commerical. zoned area . Of cburae , it would cast the ail company more money to drill from that tocation , however , at least it would blend in better . con ti.niiect . . . - 2 - i r hla y', r ML IIcl i y Pao(! 'lhre'; !!� 1, ).eas I: oad hage 7 - I of I LR is porI. on a I L e r r.a t i v.2 1 porsouz.. L l.y d 'o not like tc: h(il th ,'ea Lened by a conc!ow i ll i um pro i ec L he i np, devc: Lopczcl vs . I r es i Ll,•rii is 1 project . f Lhe pl. coni�nissLon �,an see cor�dc�minturns being do el.opeu on a site that already has !iome:s or, it and oil. wells , Lney must he blind . Also l be I i.eve the inteur, i ty should be rcduc: ed . As a rnaLter r- f fact , this project nhoul.d nor. even be al towed in a residential area as already stated . L ) This ETR report does not address the ho(neownecs concerns and is very biased in my opinion . Please read Environmental Check l. isL Forms , you will note- , there sure is a lot of mayhe ' s . .l ) Please review the Angus Oil Company IL'or financial sLaLus And previous experience in projects of this type . I ec.il ' t undet:st:and with Lhe oil abundance and prices of oil being as Low as Lhey are , how this project could be ec.or.ocni.cally feasible during these: Limes . This pence of property has � been around a long time aria has never been developed by a large oil. company , WHY ? is this ioineores pipi: dream at � the expense of the residential neighborhood ? What happens if the project doesn ' t pradtice as expected ? Will it be re- t zone,J again? I a►n closin with Lhe hopes that you will look at this situation from our point of view as hrnneowners , not future income to the City or the eil. i.mination of existing wells in the suczounding areas , because eventually , these: wells wi 11 deplete themselves . The Atigus 0U. Company is claiming this is a unitization pro,;uct in r.2ality s. t. is a new drilling project in a residential area which is against the zoning ordinance . 1 hope I do not soUnd to arrogant , however , 1 am upset at what l have been hearing and seeing in regards to this project , and T do not believe it is in the beet ii. Let:est of Lhe City or o& the :wUrounding area C Look forward �o your prcmpt response . Sincerely , Csurge Corry t cc : Pleaning Commission & staff City Council Membera EST. 19! S (20) :-PRITTIPI 5"TEI, ■CIMPANY= 1,108 WEST ANIAMMI 57TLEIFT IAW 'REACI.-I, C-Q-1F. R181"I Attw Robert FraMlin, Awsociat.1 PD=ar Huntington Peach Plarmix,; ommi.ar.,ion Pleame ba advised that: I am against any above graind oil. LIONFelp,Rnwit in the city of Hunt1r)9ton Beach. I an also -,-,,yAk u.-t reduction of set lAcks on tk*j.s px)joct. The only t�.inq I am not &-lain-at is buildin,5 I*autiful 11CM3 on this -,(Ou ?a'ee. DaLry.L w P11,0PS I�..r U�,YVMV1a.lI•rlrN•h IF•i ,L •r1.. .,yriti llli'1•.1/iN.111�r�I�J1-y+MFF4WA•1I-•IW1fWMY4�a.#1•.,W wM•i•l.tilri...1VM�'•..'�Ilr�I•ir' . �.I.11.1•,.ir •.F111r 1.1�••41M�.�1�lIMM�/IL.IY.•Ip.1•IV•J VY UVV M111.1••.rl., l.r•. . �— J,t�.. , r' 'r•' �l�I��'�. ♦ �� r.� J' 1'��' •r J.+r �C,jxrL '1*' [.�,/��r:w+T �..�f� 1.1 � � r', 1''1 I'• i '.4' sty L r,r' 1.•Ilf` 1� 1 ` N '•� t � F ,�.,r' w ! .`, /•'��+^'� +� �•�1 ti�'� +!•,��,� .r�'i•-r'LM'��.�r�� j�t.+'=�F'�.�'� ,Vi � ��i�-� �r� �,�!t„y(..��,.•�.._ �sry��rf /'�+''��-.�` ,jf� j�~• rXf��/�n w ..- ��J� •.�'� N"�•"} ',� l '1�Lr r � � ''�ti„�„' , ,7n",�� F�//y�/� /�/� J� I�jl/ //�� yid � f� /r� ,� ,. n,� rI�R� C"7!'�"i._!•.� i'f^ '74 . ' • l� � �IrI � /n�iJN�' j �--�IA..,r�_.r... --�...''�• � i .�' . f/ / ��,,,,//��yy � �_�d G `� ,-RL ;'�/'r ,�d.;*, 1.��F.-'r. . r . -i•f%!�''!1.��' i�� .{'"z�'w��i •r��:`f-�[,,,r• ^�i'�•Gi�✓'� / ,, �t"/«� {}�//�/r�J"f��%TI►/�it�j�ir'F +C+�'Jj�yk�i��•�f��I�f •x�1•f �:,(.�T^i��i•��rT��1.,/_/y j�•_•1�,� 10 ' ,• '*t'L-R, ��+ �' 1/+�Fv-"�'�+':.. �41�,L.�r•r �Kr''r��• _ �~�i 4 ��.�:i•,!•�'�••'� I r, ,�Qj' r r,J ✓� � .4�'' ��,;•o� i' �•-' e�f Lu a w G♦ OEM cJ/ .::•ls r �1�Miili�M�F bYYc 11+Mror+..+N.r....rr..,.�r r.�_.. ,* a•.u N uu i i1 111I �NOr Ywdift!Mlibi�iiit` NtliA4Y+►++++ i RESOLUTION 'N 1 . 3.407 A RF OLUTIONI OF THE C OMi-IISSIJN OF THt? C:i,ry ')F HUNT::NwTON HEACH , CA i, i v ORMIA, ADOP. T1 NG SUPPLEt•I!14TAI_ ENVIRONMENTAL IMP^.LT 11F]PO .'r NO . 88--a. ( SC;TR 801 1 ) ANI; ENVTROMMEN.AL TI.-PACT I•tEPORT t'J . 86-•1 ( EI11 86-• 1 ) FOR 'I'!ZE SPRI'NUIEl',l) 011. RECOVERY PROJECT LOCATED ON IWO BLOCKS CAN OPPOSITE SOUTHEASS':' AND A,r' Tilt' 1 q'iLARSEC;'1LOU CV :�PRINC;FIC�,U "►VE;NUt",. kPID CAL•IFORNI'A STREET Ak"ID INC:LUDINC 160 ACRES OF' CICATTEI'.ED WE,r.,L OPERATIOfJS ROUNDED GENERALLY aY F'LORIUA ;TRE),T ON 'fill: EAST AND SEVENTEENTH sTP.EE,r oi4 THE: WE'`T, HE'TWE!,N YORKTOWN AVENUE ON THE NOpT)i AND MEMPHj.'S AVELNO MI THE ':OLJ TH . WHEREAS , th !3pr. ingti elcd Oil. RP_C(M!i:J` Project ' s related kentitlements and S! I.e.rie ta.k Erivir. onment:al Impact Report No ,, 83-•l have been prepared , and Fnvironinentol Ympact: lReport No . 86- L was adopted and certified t),,, the Planninq Commission on September 3 , 198E and City Council on October 20 , 1986 ; and c'. ir:.y of Hunt ,4n9ton Beach wa:3 Lhj ,lead agnncy an the �reparaticn of th,-, Su .loment:al and orii inal Environmental act Im P pP 9 p Reports; and k.. 1 persons and agencies wishing to respond to notice duly given have been heard by L• hc planning Commission either through written notice or during a public hearing on October 181 1988 , and such responses and ccinments as were made we,,-( duly noted and Cefiporided too NOW, T CREFORE , RE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Huhtington beach as follows : a �w r � 0. ' ulNiiiiaY.MWiMr.Y/ diN �.wvarwipu++Ww++rar l.rIM++WwW++F+.+u+�4MYtft►uu .wW,,.,,, :,,., : .. u' 1 SECTION 1 . The 1'1 ,'-Innin{7 Cotrltni ssiarl doe i t;eteb;r Und tha S,4pplemer; t.a .1, Environmental Impact kek�vrt: N:� . 88-- 1. and Envi.rnnment�, Impact Repcct No . have bi:�,en comp] oted in compliance with the California Env)-rcnmental. Quality Act_ and all state and local rttL1�P` 1l :l�? , !.)1:�i:i f0ui : . SECTION 2 . The Planning commis-sion has considered a? l significant effect; delt-a Aed fa Supplemental Environmental Impact: Report No . 88-1 and. Envi.ronmentra.L Impart Report. No . 86-•11 together with existing and proposed meastaces to mi.ti'.?ate such siynxfi,:ant ef. feecs . ( Exhibit A ) � ,=trt;TION J . The i'lanning Commission further finds that through the implemenLat: ion of tho aforementioned mit iyaLion measures , the majority of the n^t.entially advi.! rr,e impact:; associated with the Springfield 0i .. Recovery project c-rm be eliminated or reduced to a level of insignificance . SECTION 4 . Vie Pi. anning Commission finds that: the benefits accruing to I.-.he city , both economically and socially, by virtue of the consolidation of existing oil producing operations to a single site , abandonment to modern standards of many existing wells and ,replacement to modern standards of existing tanks override the unmitigatable eFt:ec:ts detailed in Supp.Lemental Environmenttaci Impact Report: No , b8-1 and Environmental Impart No . 86-1 and the attached statement of overriding considerations (Exhibit 8 ) . �, t A ,4 r war...... .... n... i, .... .........u............. ... .r.+si`.w+w.•.•w....r ., ... ......r ..i u...,... .. ................ •...r...........�.,..... ....... .. ......,.... ... ... . j r r rEC''T`ION 5 . The Pla.nnin j Comml.s:; Lor; of the City of . r Huntingr:on does hrr� udopl, and a:, ad^t+: uatre Supplemo.nt:al Environmental Iri-:,act: lleEorL No . 88 - l and &.dopt: and recertify as adequate E nv i r. o.,.mernt a i Impact Report No . 85- 1 and ref`17njmo?nd.t; thrtit 1--he Supplemental "'nvixontnertt,:xl Impact Repoct No . 88--1 and adopt and ! tecertif,,, a, adeyuac--� Enviror.montal InpaCL Report No. . H6 -- 1 ' PASSEL) AND ADOPTED b1f the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach at: a ro.qular meeking thereof held on the ].8ut day of Qctcaber. __-_..__ 1988 , rya' the following eo1 .1 call � Vote : y AYES : Slaves , Silva , Laipa ig , Bourqu;gnon NOES . Ortega, 1A.vengood ASSENT : None. ABSTAIN : Higgins I ATTEST : Mike Ad ms Victor G p Planning Commission Secretary Planning Commission Cha,i.rman APPROVED AS TO FOAM : City A rney l to a.i �s i ..wM,.........w..w............... A"� tig k 1 yuf�� Faare � CONCERNED CITIZENS F0ff,,,KUNT1NGT0N BEACH ,tic Huntington Beach CA 92b48 �� oc lk--,o t�.r 2G , 1986 Honorable Mayor John Erskine C/O City Clerk , Connie Hreckti;ay P.U. Box 190 Hunzingt,on BeAch, CA 92f.,-,43 Dear, Mayor Ersk::ne: RE, Planning Cominiasion Uecis.i.ana on the Springfield Cil Recovery Project , October 18th Concerned Cltizena For HLIntington Beach, a non•-pral'it corporation , wishes to appeal the rollawing decisions: C,-0i - To adopt and certify as adequate Supplemental Environmental impact Report No. 88-1 and EIR No. 86--1 by adopting flezolutior. No. 1402 with Statement of Overriding ConsidtN.ration.i , C-4b - (1) Approve and recommend that the City Council Adopt zone Change No. 88-11 , (2) ApproYo Uae Pet~mli No, 98-25 , , Concerned Citizeri,j are appealing tor rho: following, reasons ; � A . The a:cepted SEIR' s are inadequate , for, all reasons Ltated to our prior letters and our consultants , The: Chambers Group. B. Tt,e intensity of the oil operation is an industrial use that does not conform, with the General Plan C. Individual cttlzen-lot, owner a have every right to enforce their � CUR 's recorded February 21 , 1978 in Official Record c,i', Grange County , r D. The citizens arcs being sub'ect.ed to the degradation of their residential neighborhood by industrial uses. The 57 or 60 conditions for ail drilling permit3 Will never be entirely ruet or entirely enforced as pant experiences with the applicant , F Angus Oil , has Already proved to us. We will appreciate your kind and rair attentions to our appeal , Very Truly yours , n Ma M Ra 4 h , Treasurer Fl d A 1�ra�ns Se Lary a' ee e, es , - cc: Jahn Murdwk, Attorney CONCERNED CITIZENS FOR ?. John wentervAler, CKAIM19RS GROUP HUNTINGTON BELCH i� •Vl I• z i JJ CITY OF HUNT16NGTON BEACK +t (� JTY COL1N .-.l i. ' 0Mi h1L1Pd i r. AT1G N 4 4 ' TO Honorable Mayor, City CoufiC-1 t:R c)MGr ace 4,E Members & Connie. Brockway, City Cler;; Councilwoman + 54.lINJECT DATEAPPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION Oc:oher 2, , 1988 R ACTION ON EIR 88-4, "LC ?,8--11 , AND 'UP 8°-21 y I hereby ) equest a public hearing before the City Council of the above applications. I challenge the Planning Commission's certification of EIR 38 -4, Zone Change No. 88--11, and Use Permit No, 88 -25 for the, f ollow.ing reasons: The mitigation measures identilled In the Environmental Impact Report and related conditions on the Use Permit Ito not offer the neighborhood adequate protection or address all of the concerns presented with an expanded industrial use project In ar. established residential neighborhood. 4 .{ 15�!8d 7. � � GW:Ss r �mC I c1c, M 1 r' C. 11. '7�w7YYY�14�1L1f7JIHN•! •pr.lu.1/Mi.Y l.11 Hl•J•h.a ww•IN , . . 0 . n.• n .. .. .. ,.,M•MMIN.:M• n!•M+dl4.ItJau N•i M.i y`M.•:.1ll..,n..l... l., .!.l . ..l lil .a. •,...l..•tikti....M..iddl., ...u•Iw.u.l....,u..r. ■ ,1 r�YY CI.1:Rll � Mu�i��xr'�`{ AF.'CHIr.Al.lf. Septiembnr 14, 19M 1919 Alratuia Lane 1hunfington L ea,.-h, CA 92648 FW11NTN(r yt?MM16:1I011 MID MITHt;YT, MF.MI3LRS CITY OF FIMTING ON ; KkCS 'HUNTIINGIMY BF.i► fti, %'A 92(^,,Ib Dear Sixes 1ti� DLIJJI,;i.Mll or, GMIM I FIJ%N or COYl. A3TS AND EMSTI'liICT ION S---VISTA MI, MAD. TRACT In this country, every citizen has a diati.nctive right to fight for and defend hie pEMet-ty r1 hts. Biwl.onetd ;you will find a copy vl declaration of CMML PLAN OF CDVIRANTS AND MTRICTIAZIS, VISTA M VAR TRACT. on Iota 1 through 200 izxlusiTay in Blook 180x i Later 1 , 2 IS andd.`19j Block 1804; and Lots 5 and 61 Dl.aak 2004. The !a4W 011 lrrojtct dwil.l.ing ei-te7 includen Dote 10 2, 18 and 19, BJ ,ak 1803; Parcels 69 79 9 wd 10. ihould there be any possibility 'Lhat the Angus ail :project be mpyxoved ane peemite isepued; the following covewmts emdi restrictions will be viol.atedo e t aI s 1'"01 tem s Teat no fence or. call Effiall be erected or permitted to ' remain betoeen the street and the hunt setback linal nor shO.I. any helge therein be p9 mi 1vtad to exceed the height; of three (3) feat, and no ftwa* or wall in excess of seven (T) feet in height stall be erected or maintalmed ore ipW other portion of wV residential bujAdi.ng lot. '+ kl t4M 13t '1-het no nc.,xiovs vi- offeasi•re trade or activity ahal 1. be carried on upon =7 lot, rwr shall be done thereon which may be or become wq annoyence or nuiaance to the neighborhood. 7w 4—item /'Ai No derrick or other structure deeigand for use in boring, minis oar- quarrying for oil or n-; '-anal gas or precious minerela, si a l ever be ere dodo maintained$ or pa=I M-a Ripon any lot in uai d ree]. property, Alga. encloead ary copien of the request for appolutments and resigYtaliona of the former ARCM`iTMTURAL COMl'x" EE and the new ARCHITECTMutL COMITM dated NoTember %0, 1987 by TMT:i.* VILLAGE, INC As ;you raid there th-inga, We hope you will bear in mind the )POPERY' I-IGHM of, the e1tisens. Very truly yours, -rm& Al? ,IPL�Z MMY M. p.ARRISti O TRUMs M co, Jotuz Mardoak, Attorney CONCERNED CI` IZBNa FOR MXTMGT.01 ZZACH Gootge Cor%7 1 rk Har towm Div* 11artmstl t ' I 1 •y 11 ll . i 4 .... ..� . ..�..•� �.. ,•................. .,..!\..u.•..,u u..•..... .. . .. ... yp„�Wi�,rNY/.rY.MN.�I+ MI AM.\.•Yr/.Ni.rbIM4.•••I+q••1 a.n.a..u u..'.•I a! •.4 ............. ... . L 1�:a..u.�.•��•••••11.,,.v •'� tie lures leer ••7 i—" � � . 1'U3T I P 6• t Draw► 1.^., 14+ , a.�._.. ;'ri..V'4;.: 'M rt'�'. .7.0 •. � �• J':,.M,, . '1 ,rf r•Ti.v�� tins � • sa�_. , r r• t a+a.b t ttunl irfrjton tiratl CA. 9161.8 r1 ��'� `"rr •tif�. v 09C QJe4A Cam• d , ^/) ,.,;' le GECLAPhTJ 4 _;li 6_ E vi r'AL AL•V.r...'�_ r Aeraft,ear �""� s'f' r` i + P►. r uY_Y1tt i',_ h Mli tl E S A�I;T .l9 i Q• 04,19[ • J wMifi[A�, the und,�rs, yr,t::l 7115T1?, Vlllr'.GE , itiC, , a Corporation Is the 44 er..ner of the c:errt h too ,fw)re part ict.11,e ;y detcr,aed Jt (;], rows : � i��';•�• ' •�i 1 lots I th,ouryh 2U, i.+C IW,ive, In 31ocb •1663 ; :.Ats 1 , 2, 19 t: , 9 ' 31vst4 I801; anti Lot t 5 and 6. Blunt, 2u04 V i tit.• 1'rt! i M.st• Tract , �• A% shown nt .1 m,1t1 f,'. (.rtler! it, 4, Page 15 of Mi SCd I i anQiu1 r+iiJ'S cif Of.lrr�t� f.r,��r,( • , w and Such r*.\nrrt hr,rq ;ni,rtr;r referre•J [u As the "Ge:v: l.tr.ini .", desirr to restabl ;%h ' 9 ' p' ' r rf tot ing the t.;.e .l.:di cct.upAmY 0f � • R+fir �i e,•n[ r,� , Ibr1 Cli tr1'Jr.hant S #nrJ fey: f if. iC.n.. .•. t t:el e. s41ci reel properl •r and t.ach lot or part thrreor put %uarst to a plan for stiouivid- ing andl sel line sr.id rent propert / ar CAf t trerc�.,f , frr t„a mutual ben•ddfit Qr ' ;„ •- c!t • t'r r ., each and ev.,ry lot 0 sa'd renal peopert;; or parr *h*rdeof, And the w:r.er and as►.qns �• �,. . v•t i MOW, THEREFOPIE t17 kc I arant z do ntreGy decl are and tcstatb I i sis ,he pro- � .!�.r.•.,�'i vIi on , c"cribnts and restrictions upon 4n;1 subject 10 which .ach and ail of the lots and port ions of lots sin 'the at;Wve described real prriperry shall be irrprovud � ^ ti .4 •13Id, comweyed, rrsr.d and held by the det: l,:,rants ztid chair assigns , and ea-h and asp of whie.h are declared to be- fur the m„tual benefit of the lots or portions of Ints ie, said raaI property ana each Nine thereof ;rid his successors and /::�•,;J• ; assigns ; ond fdarther that cash and all of tEe crvcrartir.I or restrIctions hereb} dec I bred %ha I l run wi th the :.snd ,1nd shall inure to and rays with 55id real property and earl+ ind every lot or ;portion thrrrof , and shall apply to and bI.1d n :::�:�L�•f the respective succesws in interest thorer;o, •nd ,rra, and each thereof is. �•.��••; ifnac,sed u oo s•sid realproperty and each tot or part Ion theret:i ,is a MWtual '� +•`\ tP a � ' ser+fttudAt in favor of each and every pjia cel of sines rcritair.ed in said real Pro- t ,` • . perty as the dominant ttnemient or terierrnts, Mltith saio covenants and restIiCi.Ion$ rt are as rol Iee,t: 1 . That 60 bus Iding, fent.e Or other structure stroll be erected, plb:ed or a,",rr�+r�';,,,i altvreo rn any building plot i,,% this subdivision until the bui 'IdIng pions , S;es:i•• f ical ions, and plat plan showirdg the ;ocal ion of such bu; I.li ng hive been approves I:r •i•,:�; ►' in wreting as to ounfdraritr 4nrJ har;,,:,;r of te.,Rternal deSigA e.ith existing %Lructu:.= !''+'M.rrtiti'•1 in :he t•.btlivision, 4nd as I Iccot ion r.l one bui :dinq tl,itr rrbFaet to tnpr►;rapny 000 tehiSre gryvnd gilt-vatiun by an Arthitecturatl tt,.-r►i ; tee cor^posed of Daftald A. • �� Ayres, it. , Michael •. Jagor, ind R"ar AtToung, Wnabe Wrrilr is as fol ia.s; ..� . r 1 1. .•4.14+.N.•, i•MWr,y�Ny„..YYWYY/J.wl..M•NYy w'•1• .M.4 ....•....... •. .,.•.....,...r••�N•.� ..•...........,. . � .a�✓•y..r'�.gy stYlY.—.. a.•.M,•�Z-' -- •y4�.��...._._.J..w, -._..:•�+.�w...•.�.,�yY#1• , •�.i..i�Fr.i'�'•n`•�y�`•-��..+•iri/4.�1YY+41V.�••I�\�'�•�4"�F''''r� 1 Jv■n ��Y4 �` e''�+ ape 20951 Arorikhuz'i t , Nu11i in; :--ns Thr-Ac;r, f.di . ' ,t r11a, 5t64(!, Or ay a r1 81W.-OL It IV$ J dot ignatod I;y 4 majority cif_ xht (,wP.hees or o;d ,•crlmI tt0**. &hoc 16 tho avant 1 Of the daeth or reslynol i1.M of en-1 ei4mh4is ,0 faig tos , the ramd1e)ng r ul *is sha I ! Davit t htc au►h0r I t y to app rovat err e i t ar►r+rove such des I An artd - location , or to'2`11 lignite a rer•resent At ivt w1 rh .I Ilse cuthorl t y. That In the event fold corrrrti t tee or its designated revretentat ivu fails to approve or di g- approvt tuck dr-sign ca,• lut:a: it:,n withh. thirty May's ,tftar said plans and ipselfi- GALLON% have bets) submitted to it, or ln .any event, If no suit to enjoin the erection of such buildings or ;ruild(njs o; making of such alterations have been commenced prior to the .rxnpleation the.'vnf, su:h approval sh,tfl rwt, bt required and this cov enanr shall be d►semnd to have been fully euripl itd wl rh, Neither the *mmhar%• 6f this conmit tee, nor its das ignated representative, shall b# vnt:itled to any Compensation for services performtd pursuant to this "vetant , "hat the powers and dutiet of said colimirtee, end of its dasignated retprasenta- I tivas shall coasa on and after January 15 ,, 2010. 'that thereafter tho approval described Iry this covenant shall not be squired unless, prior to said date and effleCtIVe thereon, a written instrument shall be executed by the them rscard owners of a majority of the lots In this subdivisiolr and duly recorded, appoint- . - Ing +. representative or representatives who shall thereafter earercist: the somas powers previously exerclsed ay said co+rrnitteel. 1. That no building RhalI be Ic►e,a`,.*d corer than IQ feet to the front lot lime. Icacattd on any lot nearer than 5 feet to am side street line , nor located nearer than 3 farm to any sine lot line and that no dwelling shall be II � lecetrtd on any Interior lot oeirer than 7. feet to the rear lot line. �. ',hat no fence or hall shall be erected or permIttrd to remain between the street and the front setback line; nor shall any hedrye therein be permitted to exceed the height of three (3) feet , and no fence or wall in excess of (71 r feet In height shall be trecttd or maintained on any other portion of any resi - dential building lot. w. that no dwei1ing Thail be a"ctred or placed on any lot having an area of less than 3,294 square felt . �. teeth toall aMich is built as a part of the original construction of this hm"s, upon the properties and p lac-ed on ;he di vidl►tg line betw,etn th* lots shall coslitltute a party wall . and, ,p this extent not IACan$Istent with tee ..ter M.11 F��1�{�V.�W{MMiYN.Y...w�...u.rUMM.MY'�YYli1MKYM'r1ti LuYJI J.)�1Jd...MM up W�VY1.W'r�• ••• ••••e•••••.•_•••rw.4..wyiww,M.YWwMMiw...... ••..ru.i..wur.ti..,..rvuq u.... .....:. �. Il. .L' �V. • •w�'7'W•�Y My1 i • .. .. Y • .1....M•Y.Y.,.r iy�l. 0 1257IN15W prvvl$itwtt of this pv-.Irr it lati, the ow"ral rolva of law ragprdlna party wal le asd. liablli ty for proporly clwoi9a dLm tar n+eglloarrc.e or nil llful actc. or amissia►s shell �pir thoret►�, i. T*a soot of reasonable repair art-d malnter,Amcv of a potty wal " shale 61 sherd by the Or+ wrs who bake u%e of the M,s i I In propnr: loin to such usrt. �. if a party wall is destroyed ada. aged by flrn or other f ijburiity, .sny OwMar• WW has ►sod Vivo we i i may restore i t , rend I f the other Owners thereafter, awke use of thti well , they shall cootriwuts to the coti% of restormtiirn thoreof In proportion to awc4 use witlumt prejudice, 1 var, to the right of any such Owners to cal l for a lamer cant ribut ion fr m the oth*rs under any rule of low mparrilrrgf liability for neillgemt or willful acts or amitelons.l Cr ...Each Owner shall. Neva the right to " tin the Fropsr.ty of the 6djolning► Owrsor for the llairltod purpose of stntanance mtd ropair of a party wall or an i asator►slon of a psrrty wail . ilttmIthstwiding snr other prvvision of this Declaration, on Omrror who by his noyl(gont or twlIIful act causes the party ru,jlI to be expoittd to the elaorants I •shrill briar the +rdWIv tzat 0 Nraishingl the nocussarr zrotectlon agolnat such a l es~ortt s. • 10. the rIgt,'_ ►if any Owrwr to cwtributlon from any other Owner under this Datlat-atlon shall be appurtenant to the land and shall pars to svGh Owner's . successor$ in tItIo. • 11. in the aver-It cif my dispute arising conearn l ng #- party wa t l , or om4er ,the pcovisIons. of this GoclaeatIan, each potty shall cheese one arbitrator, mW eel~ orbitfaters shall chose ono rKldittonal orbitrotor, onC the decision shall be by a mejorlty of on tlm arbltraters. Ix. Tliat no traller. basuwt , tint, shack, garage, turn or other out- building oroctod In the real property shat1 v any time be used as a rezidw+so tea"rari ly or vorsnsment IV, no,- sh421 any structure of a toaiporery thoracter be w ' rt�d 4• s risld�o. , that *no immlevis or offensive trade or activity shell feet carried ty*► wpm otW lot. nor shall onyth1n9 be dense thereoh which asy be at berustrrs anj Vtrldgronno' 4W Iw i secure to the ftfoborfvmd. ' 14. tos~tsof racord ore reserved for utility Instal lat ion And Mintonanca. ' I N-.IY a 1• WI�NI�Y.Y.YYIW�Y�Y�MM�NkM1.l.YqM.�v.l•..�ii.•...,vv.....4v�....I..Y.iMrM�IYM.r.IM.'..w•/..�u..u_....... .....w.i w.,M. iYJ.r.I..M.M�,�.gpJ. ...........____�....•...•,.Yr•..� • .,r.�...... awe...... ..u..�.,, . N ' � 41F 15. derrick uo" athw, stractilre dnsiyne:i (or uaa in borirsg. *irdes? ar 17 'quarrying for• W`04414,'014 or natural ga:, or praclpus sslnnrels, shall over ba 1~ erected, weintalhod, or pormilttad up+cwt any lot In scald rt*l property . Is, That roo sign of any kind 4hell he diirlayerl to the► aubl ;t. rlrn� an eny lot eacttpt One profaislonal %ion of npt mare than one square foot, ant slgn o" not mares than five square fawn advert I P I Ag t ho property for sale cr, rent, or signs of &oy slate used by a builder to *4vtrcl -e the property during the construction and tale' period. r ly. 'flat thew "versants, with tho swcepetlon of the covenants egmtaI"d In peragraph 11 are to roan with the land and shall he bl ridi ng ov all part let clelsrring under then untll .Janwrry i5, 2010, at which tisrt said •A7,vensnts shall autmettleally be extended for successive parlodt of tan yesis, unletsf by a vote If a 00jerity of tiro there tAw,ersi of the iats it is egr.^td ►n change the said � Gov oernts In *hole or in port. 'rho covenants contained In said peregraph 13 r" wl th thn $sod and sha 1 l- b* perpet ua 1 I8. 'chat If the, pirtles} hereto or any of thee%, or their hurt or assigns shall vialaio or attvWt tv vloINte any of the covenants herein It shall be lawful for any persom or persons *wn ioq any of- sa id .real prr**rt y io prosecute ' • any proceedings of law or In equity against tom person or perrl,ant vIrilattng or atteapting to violate sucrr cover►nnta and elther to prervert or enjoin hies or • 19060 from tlralng so or to recove►r' damages, or ather duos for such viotstian• 19, 'hat If any provisions of these covenants or restrictions be declared lewe)id or ummforctahle, all other provisions, caysmonts and restrictions shalt re olft ire full foirce and effect. 10. That no brats, trailers, Ntuso tral lcrs , or truths larger than one- half ion capacity shall be parked or stored in or upon the driv4wyt of any w lot In sold renal prqpotrty, or upogv the partlem of any-lent which Is visible frtw sold street and roodway. No-automobile, motore:je Ins, trai let , besot, truck or siimillasr vehiclo shill be rape,lred or pointed upon the portion Of any lot In sold rest pro"tty Aich Is visiblo from the streets or roadways of sold real property. . s I MYI a1:ri, MMY y.Wraru.urruul••• • •..r.. ,..... .,•.. r ir•i.•I.r••.I♦fl•.ri1a...ua..was.r4........r...•..-..••.ii. •.v4M1iM•i e'I r,ua.4M4.a.ua•• .....,... ..••,r,�•.�.r....- . •..,.,w•iar••.•. . Y1. Each frantae of a lot altnows for hf*wolf, oso-Itis or buccossors In ' iAreregt that" as`wi i� p�ertirir !rte air .,� by r of adjo4renr or ad,l dining + I025 to elopes ,or dre+ln&W weep I*c$9Wd on his lot -4AIeh affect said adjacent �r #t'd.la inlr+g IQLA, .pwr, - wch "woes in esoentiai for thv rAIntenance of p4r- - awont stobfllrsotion an slid Mlopesi. Of e6Intenar.ce of the draiwspe facilltiet i for the protection and wry of pro"rty other than the lot on which ,the of*" ar ,orslr_"way is 16to0d. 22.' prtinoge oott+t mts for di"mrsol of roof ►+star ism mcar0*4 repwratelV . A Gopy of gold drainage e0"Rent Is ctta .had herato. 13. A breach of any of tf'ws o►wnw�ts, ca"dltdans or restr•Ictlons she if r►st defoat or fvnalsr Invalld tim licrts of any wortgap or dyed 0' trwNt mob In taw Ealth and 'for v416e on sold lots or property or any. port Ion thereof. but gala Covenants, conditions end rostrletfons shell be binding upon and •ffectf-m agalnot " aw"r of sold land rrt+asc title Is *"wsred by the forrclosuro rf y lien y or mart" ttwraoo or Gale w+der any deed-of trust 91 vet► to occur* � the p.dewnt of e+sr WY. 24. _ This pecleretlon Woode with Ow intent to estebl :sh a general sch on for the use, ocewp&vcy "4 enjora,nt 1pf. Rho propwrt its and each and, every lot an-1 pottlon t1wreof, Declera►it makes no worrantles or representstion2, express or fspflod, aR to the binding effect or enforoeoW lty of all or any portion of . .+� thlo Declersutlart, or as, to tM ca"Itcoca ot. Deny 4 theses provisions with public laws. ordloaftes &vd ragvIations "pliceble thereto. IN V17N[15 WCA10F, the undersigned owwrs, above referred to of Ditclarrnte. r he" svised thls Instrumnt to be a,ta+tmtwd this oth deny of .,,.,. Maro944'r , r 7,7,,..�• TUSTIN vlLu►69, INC. s tt Carpoat 1 on sonoid . Ayrat, +fir.. ' her r 1 ern t • ti.lr 1 'l0f M4•M11•` .• . �. . •�i . ... ••. •.••.�...... .... ...i .. .......�,•��i i/• .•.• •1 r1 �/. .•. �. ., . ....�••i•••i.il 1.1•. ........�..•....i.•..i...i• � • „� ' r / • . 1 • 1 I s 1 . 1 Y' r 1 M 1 • ST WE or CA I f 0*40 1 1 01257IM1538 fro . ..,.M�D1to"IN so ..1w217 l.hWO aL.Ar w�1-tFrW4 0 w'•4.1•, �1O{:• w 004 (A RROA Lr/Melll M/ op ON !Iv ft%Tm .4"/af'/II -4 1O /100II A-Ra Iwl Is"64M tow 4/Ih/I1 {11vi/IIr••/�I. ow h• rf 1h- W*.W. 'FW •oN11••J 1{r r.1110/ s•hIIIrrm •a 6r4••11 .,: o1 tq"pwdwn dooio , INw•I{ w•.l r ka..«6,do••{w pw IbN -win I.ylo'dos A A, 7//IN1'm G M•MI MIIY•M {rN+`n iaw 1.. Q. 1h I�w• 1.0 4 1►ter **" /.) A• w0•wrtir f .140+•1.r• TWITra VILLAUs� OC. _ •'1 r{r�or� .rrr ••r,w><.�,�f 1 1/;11 r 'A /•1 r , Y r M+•r1Nr r �- � ... � / r •. •tiI a,. I. �/ lip • >r•r .16% Lr.1r wil/Ir/"woo a/.l. I I.b l 4'Mi\Iq MY W1'}YY'M ly.huti•...u .Yww�M\.uY.`•.\rM"ti��•41Yr/Ur•riY.+r.r..u-�•...w••.Y.i..• -_.....,. .-.fR.YYiN.•.Y . .. ... ...•••i.rYu.v_-Y.u4y4MYYUVM........•....... .. ...... ........... .'CONCERNED ..• COS CERNED wwiT1 N3' i N T N GEACH :Y.-..f.�::��u...:w�_._:�.��.�� - - ----��4.r�-w�.Yw��w�- .�..._._.._._.�..r.__.v _ _ �.•:_:�w..w-�-•._•�• ' 1919 AI*,LwA Ian# fW11ti ngto-2 'PeRch, CA 92609 201951 Brookharst S't'.r+�::t M:I-antSne4on F3eiwh, CA 1,02648 Dear Sim Labe 1 ttxou&h 20s Block 180:5 set al Oar AttarneY, J(Ovr B. M t?,r\dook baM 44,+i nvad us t,hmt the Aron i tooc t,.i ) Co.»11tero,, aw*lyl Doneld 2. Ayrreas Jr, >Msiche-ti I!. JWrs mid, Borer DtToorg eurc tiow in force on tht DWAfttion of oenerel .?Ua of aovenaniA ea d Meeatrict 4 ona on the axe ]oU of tea Vista LDal Mar Mr e t &r.4 wil.Y reei,p� 'Thta inforoa Lion is t; ofirm on a nap zvoordod 1n Book 4s; Vag* 15 of Wscellwe;,um Maps wf ox%nge Count:r* California. y We am CLAegod its a layr eui.t to pry tect ouT- :rItfi to lwiaer the Co cmix,ta end Rep-trictivne on the Vista Bel ?far Tract. ploeure have recoi-ded the fal-lowing tturee nweL, of owners w3 boi.ng the rievrxy cmated Archatect:ataZ Committee for t:,%e above wmad tTa ct;: ( 1 ) (;MICMRGE OD UT, Bloat, Ie036 lot~ I � 10,4p4 6 L 5. 18Q1 Omljornim, Street, M�OaaUnr- op .Beach, PA y9�. MMbm Re'mr.42W331ock 180), tot .� , P4 qc 1809 Gelifor►-u S-we.! t;, EunUmgton Be.%da, CA 92648 ,01 /fr • f a (3} AIBCr: A.A. ' .Al'iI?;o Block 1803, zty t 16, 181! HUntirLgton titreet, Mnt1rsgt5j1,BZeah, CA 92640 fi-k'4601t, 6;1 YOW Thank you rery mueb for your help on 'tt:ie me tter. Very truly yours, CIP Al- Mary ' . r-arri sh ' t're� are Teri.: 960-1573 ('onoerned Citizen. for F. B. i �` i T OFACE sox SM, HUNTINGTON BEACH,CALIFORNIA $2616 w � w I h tjt ti I t Y , "T U I. IN T ILMLA Et IN CI. "091 MN04*1"UPAT WIR09T ldr WNO I►QOR � r t1NtrT 1h!*T�N DWA064. 4A,L. PO"NA r'OGT mac= MCPX A 17i�1 OSAAS006 WUPMHOT-04 ■RACWI, rORNIA OPSMAG November 3C, 987 TSe under.sfirned officers hereby resign from rho' A- ;hi.tectural Comittee for Vista Del Xar Tract Au sunti.ngtat, Zeaeb. Y�a'nald' Ayr• s, Jr. .� tee/ The x•esi€ning ufflcer5 da tic:el� y appoirt as their S'!Ccesaors the folLowing , named individuals: I y r Gef)-ftrf Carr ?dark Harcmann r r, ,a -----., a . illy► EtY�ll (�13) �93.7�'�1 .:=-MPHILLYPS STEEL GUMFA4 - TI�tG1Rk !!EACH. C411F, I30 WEST ANAY�I� M $TM LAONc MACH, CALJF. 001Mn ig Samar 26,1988 Attu; Rrbrt f'r&Alin, Assocr,i.aU� M vuw Hunt"ton on Be&; 1 P Ld.nn ag L't�,1lU?ll 5 1.rJ�i Please be advised that. 1 am against: a�iy above gr•ou:-i i o .1 c3evejulrent in the ^iry of Iiuntington Meach, T am also agairis: COK lLICO.011 Of ' -t backs on this pxojOCIt. The orfty *h irig T am not against. is r4i ldiny k eauti tld hones on th,i.s gi.te, ink YOU, 4 17 4 Daryl Ru Zips ( 1 ♦ I'JSY",Ij A •r'"f r r� 1 r 10:5.4 7-T'HILLIPS ;,-J?ER,. P-,II . 4 $6 7171 at. Isis �. .:P I ��.I�'S STEEL CPAN X - _, „ ,�•... . WE CT ANAHELM STABET I.I�h1 OZACH, CALIF. A�81;S I } lk MPlEft / ( � r� •fir- .._-. �_,L Fes•?,r...�; ._•_. I VEftll•'tC;A�'ll` '.�LA�?'jl'�__•..---�• _..- .. .---r �.._.....-__... •..r..... _.___. ._... _._-...._........ ...__. .__._..�..__._. _-�...... -'ROM _ -...... ...._�.. UC'TI,�'N i_ _-+� � •4.. !.�___ '--- _-- - - - - .. . 4 r v W 4 �! ARID., e ` NCERNED t' K In BEACH. N4v09iuQr 41 190C :i1, r. r,. Nov I., Cit•, of t•IurILil,yLon Luaufi c,aLuic.-i.1 Mel bur 2000 Main LitrceL Ras ANGU PL'J'RI E'UM "Ultl'Ut7AT1014 6pr4slylt:iuld Oil ltncovcr.Y 1'ro;ject '4WIC C.hallue Vo . 8li -�].i/li;.ic 1'ernl.l't: No . iIU�LYl�A.1]'t:IlSs ( 1 ) A letter submitted by Mary 1-arrish , '1'ler7ulllGr 1.U1" l': . (. . ►1 . C` . ( ? ) Chalker GI:uup, .l uc . - Review and commerts oil t•.11e M��l.i_c:t>_ cat Ill:cFJrirata.url and lri.i L.ial ;it: 11d !:c,>: I�I-aCL .�l::Jl� I:c)f: 1�1•c)17rast 31,r. .illc� � i.c�1c�. Aj. e.a C)i ,l. 1t(.cUUVOvy Pvc•):jQ.,_,,l_ flt.rrlf� .1. 9titl . ( J' No t.Lc::� ul.' 11rupa v f•i Liw,i (A: L)ral: L Suppleutc:nLa L No , Hb - 1 Ero:a l.1ep-arL•InellL (if Collununit:y. Deve Lc;pmell L . ( 41 ) 1.-nvi.rr'tllnenLal Checklist Furlll Discus.,ij.wi 01: lill•,vaI.,o 'illlclltal l�Va hiLat;!Ulr ( 5 ) A letter suUm i tt:ed by Mary Parrish , fl't ea!;ures- a o l t U Rev. ew U I; l)l <l r L SL1pple'lliellLa.l. I', ■ t .lt . fur l hc' Allyu:� Oil. Rc�(:overy 1')`ojccL• SC H 1Jc) . 000,10917 . Vrek-ared by : ChalnUoi� is GruuP , 111c: . SepLember 19H8 • Honorable Couslcil Memuei: : The enclosure i c,onta.iiied 11c1:e i It are respec L G u 11y submitted LU the Ci Ly Caunc.'•i 1, >,y t:r,lnco -fled C...i.tt'rcllt; fur Ilunt:ingtan Beach WC 11D ) for the Counci11s iA1AEIA:jnL1iL!ull and review rela ': ive to j.fr ' s con15iillk'rat•.ion of the reEearenc e d [).Lr jec.:t: , The i nforniation is intended too ass is the, ('c�+znc:xl 1i: it ' :� clel.ilyc>�af:ion>� and to d>:uxt.har: sjWitantiale the residents ' ewitent:ion of Lhe inac?vis { 'Fy`,`,•. akitlityt of allowing Angus Petroleum Corporation to condUCt U.i.l dzilli.ngr opexatlons its the middle of a resideriLiall neighUor">tood � as descr:..bud by Zone Change No . 88-11 . � INN- Omor vj� 4, PM OFFICE BOX SOW. HUNTINGTON EEId►Q1, CALIFORN!A M1 5 ";A *mob J City of Huntington Beach Counci I Member November 4, 1988 Page Two At considerable e-pense to it ' s membership , C . C .Ii .B. ' iias retained the services of an eminently qualified environmental consult-Ing firm, The Chambers Group, Inc , , to provide technical" expertise and Lu Lx)nteaL Angus PeLraleums Proposed Project . The Chambers Group$ Inc . , which specializes in the prepara' tior, of Environmental impact Reports for the gas and oil in(wstry , has prepared an independent evaluation of tile Anrius, Pc.-troletlrli Corporation Environmental Impact Report in Enclosure ( 2 ) and ( 6 ) . This report idantifies serious deficiencies in the E . 1 . 11 . submitted to r-he City LiN., Angus . As i.n('Ucited , t-he, does not adhere to the minimuni requiL*emenLs as e.-,3tablished by the CL-Iliff.�rniL-i Environnientai. qual.-Lity Act , and there!.`orci , should lie rejeutc-d by the Cuuncil . Concerned Citizens for liuntiligton Beach hope chat you will study this issue before J'OU 1-lith great concern and re-ject. Supplement deny 'ono Change 88-11 and use rermic 88-25 . If you should require any fur Lher Clarification , or have any questions concerning this matter , plea,3e feel free to conucict the undersigned at ( '714 ) 960-8796 . MoSt' R pec;Lfully� - Ole CONCERNED .'�TIZEN6' FOR 11UNTINIGTON BEACII PAMELA A. STEELE President PS.- Jrr Enclosures P47 11 �,,•,1��1� ,M � " 4 x , J x! r' V Y y' wy �a ENCLOSURE LETTER SUBMTTTCO 8Y mmI PARRTSfi, TREASURER FOR C.C,H.B. t'��t�G1iPd1lJM.�.u�W../ .^f�G M;.�)'I�,•'•n d�� _ ..._ �_yuu'...m� . .Pi June 27, 1988 1919 A l e una Lane Huntington Reach, CA 92648 CITY OP HUNTINGTON BEACH WARTMORT OR OON"ITY DEVELOPMENT ATTs Catharine O'He►rn Deer No Oftras REt Draf .f. Supplemental Impact Report No. 88-1 In reply to your letter received June 3, 1968, we would -like to bring to vour *ttsntlan the experiencee we have had in our neighborhood from the aeUvitiss of Angus Petroleum Corporation in their pxopored Springfield Area Oil Recovery, p.woj ec t. ' r The following events took place and are on record at the City of Ifuntingtotn Beach: ( 1 ) Duri.ag operations, the cl.tizene were subjected to noise hazards; levels at 55 Decibels one day and at 72. Decibels another day. (2) There has been no signs of any form of dust cow. The ai tize:ns i have been aub jean id to hazards o ' dust during the frenzy of work in the area after October 1 , 1987 and since our injunction to stop the project, dated February 18, 1988. Contrary •tom An43us prese release::, CONUBNED CITIZENS never refuses to allow Angus to ntxt in street•a end svideswaUcs in the area. 11e ©nly denied their proposed a .. foot wall which is not allowed by the Corenaats and Restrictions sin Angus lots and adjainirg lofts in Tract YIST'A DEL h►...'R, lots 1 throt gh 20, Mock 18039 et al. ( 3) At California and Sprir_gfield Streets, the citizens experienot?d a fire and smoke inhalation. Thie block is for all oil �t.orage in the proposed project. (4) The heavy truck -traffic duri ag the period of time: quoted :in (2) is for more than a residential area Can abids- . Did yott Itnow that these heavy- duty trucks une the entrance on Delaware Str►:e3t vrh1e;a the school We picks up our children to go to e,:hool? (5) On California and Lochtet-r Streets, there was a major dis:ruptmont of electrical ©ervi©ee for s:_x hours, damages were paid by Angus. The above events are merely the "tip of the icebergs .for our neighborhood. We txe enclosing a formal .r.xivironme-ntal report prepared for us by .fr. John F. Werstermaier, CHJW3R13 GROUP, LWO, Santa Anal California. .Very truly yourA, . eR Mary . Farrish, TreMki-er CONCERNED CITIZENS MR HUUTING1101f .BEACH COs John T`eoUrmier _ John B. Murdovkf Attornoy J� r. WWI F �i ENCLOSURE ( 2 ) CW MER GROUP r INC . - REVIEW AND COMMENTS ON THE NOVICE OF PREPARATION AND INITIAL STUDY FOR DRAFT SEIR FOR PROPOSED SPRINGFIELD ! AREA OIL RECOVERY PROJECT. JUNE 1988 . 1 ! { F ' f� i • � R��a,A..�'µ.i,�y'`,I�� a r{1'� �r �_�i'_� �_ .� ..��.�.�', �, �"..r ".,•. �.i: �� ..., �,�� ... � � ,... � ��_ - sl .Y �ryv• AL MAIM q REVIEW AND COMMENT l,. ON THE NOTICE OF PREPARATION AND INITIAL STUDY FOR DRAFT SUPPLEMENTAL EIR FOR PROPOSED SPRINGFIELD AREA OIL RECOVERT PROJECT I Submitted by: CONCER14ED CITIZENS OF HUNTING'1ON BEACH i� k.1YI, 1 Y4 ,' JUNE 1�►�8 24 T� kl, ' Y Ih, �' � i.�a,�J'' � f 1,,��14+•�e•till, ..r�w,,,��,b _ _,._� .yyJJJ)}yyy "'kW� t:• 1 1' '�i 1 ' } RECEIVED CITY CLERIK 1pM CITY OF NUNYINr7 F" z 1 11} CAW. AA41W petrolow CWnKfation Nov ! 3 hid '88 1 •. 1 fi4lsa AvsrrW �-` FirMt��dsach,Ca{{lornia I�"r11� November 17 , 1W Mayor John *rak•ine !layorc pre Tan Tom !lays I Mr. woo senr*.iste:: No. Nuth Finley Dr. Pat*. Green Mr. ,Jack Kelly Ms. Craca Winchell City Council City of Huntington A*Ach ?000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Re: AMS PetraleUS CorpgJgtia1) Q11 F-WA:. .('&JUM SehAlg .—LIA W Pit WL-U Ald "19 Ak-11 Dear Major Erskin and Memberb of the City Cuunc i,l: ANGUS Petrolem Corporation is the applicant for an oil recovery project ("Project") which will produca approximately nine mil'lian barrols of nil from the 160 core Springfield Unit, This letter is inte-oded to supply the City Council with addition&l information regarding issues which have been raised by the public during the preparation of the Supplemental Environmental lrapoct Report ( "SEIRII) for the Project ("Project") . 1. • prig 9s� SrS) JU X&'-1Lkn& eons The Project Area, as defined in the SETR to include the 160 acres of ehe awbsurfaae oil unit, contains 22 wells along with 7 associated tank batteries. Vo,.a of the tank batteries are equipped wich vapor recovery sys+tme. Korst are opayn to the atmosphere allowing gaol :rid vapors to *s44#*. bane of the atteries have more than the most radio*ritavy Lire E$Shtfog eq"posat:, produced avatar is dumpel into th>s servers off of ` dtA Wit toe r or "gun barrels' vitho>ut concern for vapor contaiment �. . y Gard a►"J% to the volume of fluid that the city hewers must haridle. P"opi}S wplxr Opt are equipped with rod pua sir..3 equipment all htwe moo 1soks�- arouM the stuffing boxes. Since thaws wells are low volume j and 4o not require a comtant attention, many larks do unnoticed for 606ftl, mPUTS and maybe even day:. The wells all have callara which s 094tsoiss Sao arude oil usually floating on top rf sons water. Those 'p gFs,'1Y; alftyd presents�cnae ds%arc of overflowing during tog rains . All seven of the tank batteries will be replaced by new tankage *quipped with state r I the art fire suppression and vapor recovery equipment. Produtad water will be laotered, filCered and re- injocted p' r ; of ` w a yi WA6.. Norm a /.rwwK •A :Atwx PavoNtxn t".amsftn City council Letter November 17 , 1988 into the underground oil reservoirs. The wells will be replaced with new wells equipped with. new wall heads and will be produced usitig submersible electric pumps . Nothing moves through the well head unce the pumping equipment: has been installed so that leaks are kept to an absolute minimum. The old cellars will be replaced with trench type csllsrs containing wall heads on 8 fact centers 9 feet below ground level. Since an operator must enter these cellars once a shift, they will be kep t puatped down and clean, Thia will be easy to do since each cellar w111 be equipped with n sump pump that will pump any rain water or other liquid into the clean-Up system and be re-injected or sold with the p?:oduced oil. The present syste►r require that a vacuum truck be used to pull. down the liquid in ti callars, This .is both expen!eives and unhrridy, 'which are rea..qons for nc;: doing it frequently . Botch the exiastir:g wells and the tank batteries are in close proximity to dwellingm. Some are less than 20 fee:: from Domes or condominiums , The most obvious case to sit*. are the five wells located in the Vi tla St. Croix condominium complex. The now fac:ilitiea +.nd wells will. be separated from dwellings by public streets; surrounded by black, calls and lard*taping. The walls will be located under ).;round in trench cellars. A far safer circumstance than now exists . All of the existing wells a::e connected to their tank batteries by means of buried pipelines . Many of tlaese ;.fines a-re ol-i and their exact location is unknown. 'they will be replaced by pipelines that are in cand:,eit:s under the corner of Springfield Avenue and Huntington Street or hung on the cellar walls where if a leak does occur , it can be found and repaired e!esily and quickly. It has been estimated that some 18,000 feet of pipeline will be abandoned by the Springfield Project ; a great reduction in the potential for leaks . 2. • I01LO011 IMR49ts Attachment 1 to this letter contains the testimony of Dr. Edward T. Holton regarding; the toxicological impacts of the Project. This � testimouy wa.s presented orally before the City Council on October 20, 1986; on November 9, 1988, Dr. Helton confirmed by telephone that his tes:imorry has r.ot changed sincp that time. Dr. Hslton's Curriculum Vitas 1i also attached. His testimony concludes that the Project will j not result in any acute or chronic human health effects from hydrocarbon fusses. �,` _ �. - S�rtlatstral Inteatrity At,,� � .�� R t l As stated in the SEIR, th• Project will be engineered to withstand an earthquake of MS on the Richter Scale. Attachment 1 sets forth the `• specifications which roust be followed in :'it construction of the tanks . 4 ' �rsn3�s. x lt1l� HV��inaCon ►$�� OeneT►.A� �iI ii� � �# Attachment 3 consists of a summary of "01" oil sites in residential Page 2 iT , 1 J r N"FWOWM Ctxpawon City Council Letter November, 1.7 , 1988 are-so s.n the Cit This attachment shows clearly that the ,project is not "uniquaO to Io-c*ting oil drilling facilities in A residential neighborhood. i s. - HualLngx9l 89&zb Enogg figritz. Aeyorts The City of Huntington Beach ,Department of Developwent Servixon, Planning Division prepared r sariss of reports rell-tLng to energy issues to 1981. Attachnent 4 consists of Report No. 1 , "Pres+ervIng Surface Access to Underground 41I Reserves In Developed Areas" and Report No. 2, "Pl..ce! Impact of Oil Operations in Huntington Reach. " These reportx set Korth the Cit:y's strong policy to support oil consolWation pro,jacts and summarize a number of the advantages of theses pro-;sets . As noted can page 15 of Report No. 1 , which describes j the advantages of unitization, unitization is a more afficiren.. 'y prud%,ction technique which increases the total volume of oil recoveved I snd decreases the time it takes to prodeine that oil, The report also concludsz, however, that the land use advant;agai of unit;is...tion are equally tuportant . Dacausr. new wells can be consolidated into walled and landscaped islands, anA exirting wells which are not Important to tha injection pattern way be plugged and abandoned , unitization is a beneficial totiA for sestheti call,y improving oil field operations and elinii:sting deserted, idle or unneeded wells . If you have any izdditional questions regarding the Project, or require additional information regarding any aspect of the Pru,ject, please contact me. Very truly yours , Tnhn D. Carmicbael Vieft President Page 3 r y N � y ML P nr1 .M1YiMN: 1iwMMN•irIMM.'+• �M+^�••rr.� ��..w -++.- ««w Nll� ' 9 AT=== i ATMLM OF DIL RDWARD 1). HEM 11 TO H %; OTON BEACH C` ff COUNCIL 00MBER 200 1986 "Mayor Mand.ic, Counctlarrem,bers : I'm a professional scieent Bts and tozicologist. I' m Director cif the Divislen. of Occup&tional Human Toxicology at Saint Francis Nemor ial Rospital . I was asked by ANGUS Petroleum to reviow the eituat-AoA with rag.rds to the toxi;.;ologi,csl perspective. Just to give you a ,Little perspective on myself, I ' ve been a profeasional chemist and icl antlats at the National "Tox" ('roxicoiogiwail, CiRnter, Albany Medical School, New Mexico State Vniversity, the F ,D.K. ? New Mexico State, etc. In doing thia• I ' ve ravif-:red the LTR, aasociated documents regarding omisaalor,a, etc . I made a site visit ip+t week. I looked at the facility. I spent .some tius speaking with the professional staff of ANGUS Petroleum rag*rding the technology involvcd and the chemical nature of this particular crude I think the most important thing to say here is that we are dealing with crude oil . We know a great deal about crude oil toxicology. We know � that it has a 11mited toxicity because cif its great viscosity. , In addition to this, we know that crude oils have this toxicology with regards to the type of crude . In this particular ease, it' s a amphailtinic crude. It doesn't have high hydrocarbon emission . The ma je)r hydrocarbon which comes from this crude is methane . It' s shout 93 percent, about 2 percent ethane . Methane, more than any other, is an asphyxiant., it will suffocate you, as oppcoed to the neurotoxic effects of hydrocarbons that have a►ich higher molacular weights. Looking at this project,, looking at the fact thtt tAe project will reduce the emissions through vapor z a, aspture systems by 93 piraent rind look.inq at the q"aatities that Mould be expected to be released from this system on a yearly basxr. I would not, professic:nally, ' 03rmct Mare to be any acute or chronic human health ' hifacts ,free the hydrocarbon fuses . Thank you. 1 rt, ru� 1 MIi+NM1YNM1Mi11M,NMMMf1.laY{, WMMMNM 'MMIV".NIMM/111�IL�N.�.+. "h Amu Oki Cm GL W V I yet f "Aw► EdNar d bale He l tart, 1s Junm 19i I V45 MARITAL STATUS t married, M l f• - Joan CHIUM Is DaAuSl%tor ,a Elise W l ane q ern August 13,p 14?73 , 8t n, Jacob EaimN d, INwn Jansiary 28, 1979 P �t Division v4 Occupational and Vua" Tact i cal oqy C#4nter for Rarhabi l iLotion and Occupational heolth C kt.Y Francis Meocr r al hospital 9Qo !•i -d& atewat San Francisco, CO 94!09 TNXXPND E r (41.0%) 775•1762 (Work) y f415) "7-1043 (Ho") EDlNCATA CIS s O. A. Chealstry., 1967 Texas T-�Zh Unlversity Lubbock, TX M.A. Bi of ogy, 1969 v The Cc,l l ege of Wf.i l i afi and Mary, Wi 1 a 1amsbury , VA i Ph.D. 91elogicad Scierrcas - `Piorham&stry, Carl l oil ar Physiology and Endocr i no l vgy) w 1972, Uni vorsi ty o4 Cal i foirni a, Santa Barbara t, CA Postdoctoral , NI H Postdactora l Fellow, August 1072 to March 1973,E Steroid Biochamo' stry, Worcester Farundat.$an 4cw Exp*rfoentaAl Biolopy, Whr"aburyr Not 1964 (March) - Director Pro sent Oi vi s i o n of Occupot i oa val and 14urwn Tom i col ogle Cmter for Roha bi l station and Occupational health Hospital Prrafessi ooal Staff Member- Et. Francis hemorAsl tlo"i tal San Fr a"C i sco l CC: 94 S 49 i"0 w 1984 Pres i de"t, Di o-Bystem s Nesearch, 1"t o 8on i or Vick*-Pr osl dont for Tox i co.l ogy (Jan, 1962 act , 1 ) Director of Tou i cologw (Dec. 19M - Wc. 11911 Las C.rucosj M ilOW3 and Salida,, CO 81"1 { j FJ �r w ' , an1H t d :.Y .• ... 11 1� of 16 19D4 ranch Assaoiate Prefwssor sf Tomicolo9y Assm,i 4te Professor of Chemistry Coordi"atur, Draduate Toxicology Program (Oct. 1 - 1"41 Now rhmi co State Uvoi vw si ty, Las Crt :*s Chief,, Divividm of RAochorslcal Toxicology, . Asetwi ate Pra4esoor of Toxicology N!'W J/ih A;;tt Pavearclh Institute and „:. The International C*nta,r for Enwirooirantal. Dtirdian g Institute for Cvi,parative ' and Human Tar; za l toffy, Albany Medical ' Dchool , Albany? NY (Nov 1979 - roc 1991 ) �`.;. 1970 - 1979 Director, Department of Chemistry DialcVic Safety Evalmation Divirion e, Litton 36o"stic%�, Inc. Kwnsi ngton r MD 20"S 1 k"h 97$ Di r•ectc4o, Drug Rssear,-th and Evaluation Program fifty • itsmbe,`- t979) Sent or Rsss«rch 't'`hsaoi st (March 1976 - May 1970) National Center f cw- Toxicological Research Food and Drug Adao!ni stration .., Jo4 f errson, AR 72079 Assistant Professor of Pharmacology and Pediatrics Uksl'rrsorsity of Arkansas far "odi cal Gniencas Little Rack, AR 72201 3976 1976 Chi erf , Cl ini cal Rsrsvao-rah Captain, U.D. Army Drcwo►ke ArwV Medical Center- ry ' Antor•1 o, TX AmOstint Prafe+ssor of D*och *mi str•y (AdJunct ) Dwpartment W Allied Health and Li•iw Dci onc*s • Uni v*rwoi-i y of Texas goo" Antonia, TX 1974 1+47s Associate Foundatiaarr Scientist (AdJunct ) Southowst Poundaticwt for Research and Educati .n gay► Antonio, TX 1973 - 1973 Directar, Clinical Research Laboratory Captain, U.D. Army Brooks Arey Medical Cont wr Sort Antani a, TX 1 y r � a} Y r`� � UIVAn D. fELT(Wo PHaDr Ism► 3 of 16 MEAL 10T•IVIT169s pp rl an ChAirew,,0 Osslen► in Pacific Confaronce or, Qmpar'ativrei 4ndocr i m of"V•, hold In Santa ■arbar fa, CA 9 Mai/ "q l 970. Invt4WO Imipeer, 6th International "osium an Qwparativr Endo- cri nevi of fy a pa of f o Canada , June 13--19. 1171. ieentifia Cosesanicotion M 4th International Congrewis an Hareswnal Stare-Ads, Mnx 1 co City, 11upt ambeE r 2-7, 1974. Invited paper, 3rd Annual National Center for Toxicological ' A.—e—t h/fOrmnee Rwomwch Sysp os i uw j Little Rock, AIM$ Move or E' Coneswl ti r4 ii reehooi st to the Ow"u of Foaia can Ni tr ofurona, Irsbr't�at'1/i ;�977. Sesslon Chatr"n and invited Paper, 4th Annual National Cantor for Tw ico 'e0i cayl fteewrarRch/Homer P"erarEch Byapoo i uee+, Little Rock, Akr ft-t berr ��4-12rS, 31"7w Ba rt f{i to erp` Food and drug A"i ni strati on - pi eethyl stf l .%,obtral i4 eaMr roger, Rockville, Mti, January 129 1977. Invited Speakers dardon Raiwar ch Conference emi Environmental and Sw wt i c Toxicology, Pl yeouth , NM, June 2b--30,1 1978. Invf tad Speakerr i National Institute *+ Occupational Health and Nafaety - Workshop on Estrojens In the Env i roneent•I, Cincinnati , Ohio, February 9-10, 1979. I nvi teed f reeakeEer, Ritual fleeting of the Assoc i at,i on of Official analytical Chemists, Barr Francisco, CA, My 6--7, I V79. Session Chairman,; presort fhesearch Conference of To pt i Gal oqy and Saferty ivaluistionw, Meriden, NH, July 30-August 3, 1979. Coo,osul taEnt to the UPJOHN Co. , Januar-y--March , 1990. Invited Bpaakerr, peparte nt %� Chersri entry a Mm Mox i,co Stater University, "a Cruces, NMf, November 15, 1980. Invited 'Opeakedr, Iienentwch Cc,rporation, Go. San Francisco, CA., April 209 1981 . Y.I r , Y Pow 00 I&TWO PHS D« "OPM100ft AMAVITIVIS (Continued$ toovd4ot to Wtv Corpswatlan and Poker and Hostetler, Cleland, out "t 'mayor• at LOW, I 1100-1 . oul tant to 11.9 a Sell Corpar of i on, 1900-19t4 Invited Lscturar, North►w at Center for Medical Edtucation, Indiana k University School of Medicines, September ", 1991. ConSulOjant to the Ar tmal Health Institute, 19IlI to present. ft i anti f i c Advisory 1foard ambers Asphalt Roofing Manufacturers * Aasnlation, 1941 Present's Invited Speakerg Soctoty of Tualcologyramarican Society of P2ares- trlepy geed K%pariwsntal Therapautics, august 15-19, 19e2, cuts- vl i l o, KY. Invitee! spsoksr, Practicing Lair Institute, New York City, Septa 10-1i� i9�. Invited Speaker., •an Francisco Syepos i ua on Occupational Disease L.1094tion, Sh s'rae .1scee, October 15-169 1952. Invited fteakswj Practicing Law Institute, NYC, Nosy . 4-5, 1"3. � Invited Speakar g Industrial Claims Association, March 27, i 9134. Invited tpoaker, Northdwn California Occupational Miealth Cotter, University of California, Ilan Franci seal Ilan Francisco 66neeral Health Center, Apr i 1 11 , 1984. InVt%o l Speakwr, Sto Francis Memorial Hospital , 4ursirtg Education .� Depar'tmentl r June "q 19E4 r . Invited Speaker g KAipA Msdi ca , Radio Program - House Call- Taxi roe in the Envl ronmont, .owner 1 O, 1984. Invited Speaker v Nat i Renal Conference W Administrative Law Judges/ Depar t c f Labor, Ocean Ci ty, MD, ,SoptwAbor 11 , I994. Invited Speaker, Re habA I i tati on industrial Nursing Group, South San Franc i►sc ra, CA, October 1 , 1904. fir' �•'3r/,Wr:' . 1 ut w 44, ii two Of 1w1Rv_ Vft1 . IVITIRON fCantinued) ,. ; nvjj14 I jolt60notimial Electrirr, R Eleistranic Rn nwwwi , ,� . T1 c �► n theElectronics in«lwwtt��r i Palo U te, CAI InvitvO maker, ftDerOOMO Will b MOOry, Taws cai a Y Sefinaw o Deawalmr i 4, 1"49 Chicago, Illinois. 4- FaCul ty "*Wbgw,, timl i f o rni s Soc i arty of industrial "ad i c i ne and 8urgery9 Member 269 i .., - January 20 19WO Maui , Hawaii * Invited Rpeakw o DOense LaNyW's' Asw xlation p February p, 19 , sm Francisco, COO r xnMAW ftjokerg International Electrical it Electranit Englinewing Socivtyi Towicolcapy in the Electronics Industry, halo hlto; CA, kale The Igoe Invited car. lndu etrial Claims Assatiati on, Chemical Um ins M .pA L;- FroaO sca, CA, June 189 1TEW.. Invi t 606►1cer t University of Cat i f orni a, (bar, Francs ono, Tax i col'opy ftminarl June 149 t . Invited 4peaker, Date Area Oncology Nivroing 8aciwty, DEB, Ban E Fr omi sco r CAA, June JT, 19M. Invt ted Speaker, Saint Franc-is Maari al Hospital , Oncology committee Tumor Conference, DES, San Francisco, CA, July 23 r nvi t Speaker, Labor b ropl oyment Law Program, briAg Scroianing and Abuse in Industry, February 27, ice, Santa Crux, CA. Invi tied .SpaMker, Living M Working Around Potentially Taxi c Rubstowas - Hemil th Consi derat i ons r. San Jose Chmmber of C iwc• and Santa Clara Valley World Trade Association. 84m Jose j Cps April 28, M6. i i I ' 4, T !Y' flow y ,. .ti�iN a"'•,'r4 .a.. Milt, :M'l,' •;",M^. r . .�A','yi {{ MIMM1f•1rWMrMl�bwl.�rrrrwYLwlrw+wrwMww w ..{y+ iM f!: ff +Y ,L,},Jy4I 3"sti tutus of Health Pstdoctoral Ael l a#4 1972-19739 vre4ko Ar ftdi cal ter Research •rant C-1759 The kin �d p, 11itrn Mwt"Ol t em 04 than 1"thet l c and Natural '4 ;• Meritorious Service Medal United Stators Aray l 1974& 11RAMi�1 AitL�#it�a I* prug and Xonob i at i s pur i f i c at i on and identification a. Sephodex L.N-20 OWcoatography C Mo 1l19h Perforeance Liquid Chromatography c. Gas—U quid Mroaatagraphy 2* Synthesis of •terol d conjugators and dor i vat i vev« , 3* ftdi of sartppe technology and theory. 4. Wman, wAb-human pri aratr and rodent metabolic and trans-- placental phareacakinetic studies. ' Ih 1A IglyA and Lft XS twati nq and mechanisms of drug tope i ci ty. '1 6. 14ass spectre"trys 70 fWrclaric acid purification and analysis. awtabol l e studies. 9* lltarol d radi of cmunoacssaly, 10. %Wuq and cheaical aniaral safo*y tooting and twicalagy. '. 11ociety of Tox i col ogy The Endocrine Society Amwrwlc*n A mmlatiair for C1inicoal Chosistry Aasrican Chemical Society Oh w York A ca►demV of Sciences Nocl oty of Scots' x i cal ogy and Rnvi ronawntai Safety obi T 1Cr+t�„ l N1Tl�NTBr fidi for i Journal of App 1 i ed Toxicology Affiliate Torreicologist Cal i forni a Primate f soarch Center University of Celiftanis Carvi s$ California Staff Toxicologist Avedleare Mal l fcwni a Industrial Mwdi cal Clinic) San Frarncisco. CA 'y• • ire own* 4 � � r D. fwTM PHO Do 1►q�x� � 11f #� owe IC' �1111 tJlCII . �xltI�IMC�i I ITWO r a •TNQY �a+�oR #C�iterilhe, wstabol i se/pharaascoki notice Hati anal Science, Foundat i on a#010tsron• dotabsl i ae/phar,macoki ript i cs National Science Foundation 19-ow protestin JIL vitro oxidation National Institutes of Hoa l th f Worcester Foundation for Rx- peri~tal Biology 17a-e,thynyles*tradiol. World Health and wnt.ranel wotabol i se,/pharasatok i not i ce f)rb an i x at i on di ethyl st i 2 bostrol oetabol i sa/pharsacak i net i ca Food and Drug Ades i n- and astradl al tax I col aqy/teratol oqy i strati on optow enhancer La XjUg metaba:i sm and ARCM Chemi cal ,, Inc. analytical chemistry or'waplhosphate HLP Chemistry Mobil Oil Corp. E anal0"1 c 8LP Chemistry End*/E. l. DuPont Corp p l ast i c t x er MY Chest%try CTFA flavor enhano..rrs OLP Osumi%try FEMA baser! de fumigant residue anal ys;i s great Lakes Cheiat cal s diwetic pharsacakinetics/ Merrell National Labs pharmwadynami cs Insect repellent dorsal absurptIon Johnson 's Wax excretion (B.C. Johnson b 8an) ant!hyportenbi ve pharaactsl oqi cal Ci ba Goi gy wgrnt aromatic amine, pharawokinotics E.I . DuPont par pharaacedynaalca Numours b Co. ophtnalmic replacep- pharmacokineticsl CILCO Qw'p. sent fluid pharmKodynami cs ,.4 Lills 0+., �'�`4�,'1��•'�h''? �.�}r��:r' ,1� xh.,,'�iY r ,d v!? 4 �1'I i4y° i. y�+{4 "r �', '}�',. Y/rs' r• AM COWMCIAL EXPERT t (Continued) artifW&I swwtr ton I cot ovy and Calorie Central voluntary Intake Lune:i l /Papsi co fte/skin card teaicalegr studios plop-rhar" Corp f dolwt prodrats American Cyanamide Mt rp*tt9 drug pal ft9istratIan UeOv Boil Corp bls+•r&ti*nai persti- !PA IhgLatration U.A. Soil Cora Ot ds caramel eel or pharmacak i nst i e:s C�raewl Concee►n- phar mocadynasics trate Council #ood 9 drug and endocrine toxicity CCM A cat i c coil ear And No* 3 � pwy4heocti ve primate toxicology IDEA Corporation . drug sub-acute anti-Pandr"IM FDA itwgistration Chantal Pharaa- toxi col ogy & endocrine taut i cal Orval uat i on ' dermal i►,tV bi och mi Cal mechanism Amer i cart Cyanamide � screening agents anti-herpeti c FDA Regi strati an Bovran Pharmacsur- drug toxicology oval oat:i cm t i c a 1 l bi a-,engine erd FDA rigs strati°on dl o-Tochnol ogy one yews b hareen s safety a toxicology 8m*ral Corp* evaluation reed phosphorus cheel stry and U.S. Amy• peerchiereeethms inhalation toxicalogy Fort VieMtrick. MA FM colors Chemistry CTFA **d Mess. 9127,36 cellular implants safety revaluation Nana Biologics sul,fohamider - regulatory evaluation Animal health antibiotics Institute 76, ,,' 1 y'7 ' I. a✓ ti W' c5, , ' ' :i:'' :Ir�i'rj {',,r,h�I •, � y, ,y,li. ,' ..�+ i.l i'�' �n� r 1 ti " ' ' yw,r.':y•rW • ``"' 7 r SPONSW I'41 ! i ►$th 0#fectlsil an UPJohn r.�ely 4unvietdo ONO La VIX0, toxicity consultation �, f .. ttiva E asphalt cancer Asphax t PAW i nQ manufacturer ** Assoc. I antibiotic toxicity/registration Tech America an pi�►ti, tcticology study inunitor Animal Health ! Instituter anttbiotic FDA regulation Maurrr•y Biological asp"l t i rwal tar cantor consultation -asbestos,, dust tannins and dyers canter Tanner 's Council of Auer. i to b Ibwr ss Leather Co. , Inc. p Y»r►ntal extracts of f i cacy 81 o-P'harea Iwthyl bremido human neuropathias consultation vinyl chloride, human eaneer j lookemia Mobs 1 ie GAR purl ywothano t ani l i nos b i!sdcyst•s Amami& fumes respiratory disease consultation Petrochemical 4 wes hlu"n cancer consultation b benzene f uiw and chord ial N'IOW Si tip Visit Mower Leather Co. aromatic awin** bladder cancer NICSH/Bynalloy Corp. vinyl products n opathi ss/cancer conStAl ati on floor tile & lung disease consul tat on asbestos siding , r y .1. 1 r •.1 r1, r•' 'Ni 1' aM. `,Ip'r r+ V Nr ^, y, p, 1 Ow SAL ItIPIMIRNMR4 %Wwoontotivs Cases (Continued) R M w to lung disease consultation Iti 00&w" 09 patrolnum tntestinal dmeer consultation fps h astw &WOOtlhlrIone environmental disease consultation ' shl orow"anS r rA"&orosthane awbostes b mineral respiratory disease consultation l oaf 04 f loori w i rator disease consultation r �r �P Y 6 OtOi n9 materials ' a�rbestw lung cancer consultation Polycyclic aromatic allergenic responses consultation f Al Pat At remvvarrs e"hageal cancer consultation t. sw� -cooductar neurasthenic effects Worker 's Compensation chemicals S ki dnrry di swese Claims solvents nasal tuauare i m mmotax i c i tyr polychlorinated acute effects City of San Francisco b i phanyl s & POW beftopyl , captan teratol ogi cal off tact, consultation di m ethoate r Pr-ovsra N�r+trdwti n anti-vtral drug FDA Registration Savran Pharmaceutical par*-ni trophenol contact darmat i t t s Belleville Shoo Mfg b chromium salts . OSHA organophosphates organophomphate Worker 's Compensation Induced del ayed Claims neurotoxici ty environmental clinical ecology worker 's Compensation chemicals Claims 10 '« ! r 1•, • ��. Win'. 'r,' ' r y. a :'; rl4.- r � �w•�wwwwlMMr+rrti ......r.. .Ww.MY:! N r Ora lift. RXPIM110M, COMMIrMh Prwprlplr►r'rtat.ive Cement (Continved) 111 ire nt.al clinical ecology Mdrker 's Compensation � , E claim rr�sr+is ► Ire rvi i ium human exposwre Flo tram t xndas�Pr mol wins a atchants human toxc i col coy Electronics Industry dopants i.o�cyarM+ater� occupational asthma paint is plastics tpsirts h plastics) iindustry 406"tom restrActi ve lung disease Lang Share Act j K oil sea lung cancer & mesothel i ama Cases & Civil Action anal gesi cs r steroid rdvwse reactions toxicology evelbati ona www oleptic drags anaphylaxSris I 4 r' r .It ; t, y w�.W �w/w1.Wyw.�rwnn. wwa ..wywd wNwMM..w . ,.. t$ ' 00- 12 eef lb •r 1 UNL t CAT I e (p 1bth*p r H.C. one Mal ten, E.D, t The Production of Mi crob i rl-Raegul atoW y opiate by keel aterd Ae pen Ti esuae. Plant and Call Phyai of . , "t!l09-b11 e LNOI noo r WM Ne , iradl ey, E.L. , Hal tear, E.D. and Chang M.Y. a The Stri bW ion and Meetsbeal i ge of Cart i costaer vne In Birds. J&, PromW i nVe the #Ah 2nternativnal byageaesi um on Cosiparat i ve Endocrinology,$ [#errt and wwwp. 0Mrerinel . , Nuppi 39 226-378, 1972. S« 101 ton., t.b• and Nol wn, W.N. a The Distribution and Met abol i etas of LaWt1 ed Corti costoroi ds In the Duck (gQALS W--- ,,yrh1 „ ere) . J. Endocr i nol r 361-30,o 1973. C Wi l l t aes il M.C. , Nel tex r v E.D. and sot dz i Sher , a•W. t The Urinary lldtabol i tea of I7a-athynyl ostrad i of-9 a 110 ON In Owens Chrmatographi c F'reaf i l i ng and Idonti f icaptlon of Ethynyl and Manethynyl Compounds. Steroids, no "M IM. 5 Nwi teal i E.D. , Mi l l i a ms a M.C. and E3ol dz i eher , J.W. a Human Urinary Liver Conjugates 04 178--ethynylestradiol . Steroids, ZZMI- 9671 1976, dry "pi ton r 9.D. , Wi l 1 t aes, M.D. and Bol dz i aher, J.W b e Oxidative "Ot,abbl.i so and be-*thynyl l anti on of 1!a-wthynyl estradi gal by Baboon Liver Mi erosaewr. llteer ci als, a&7 i-113, 1977. To Halton, E.D. &W Aol dz ieeher, J.W. a " etabol i sm of Ethynyl Estrogens. 4• Tom i col. Rnvi r an. Hoa l th l ;le 321-341 , 1977. 8. H101ton, E.D. and 8oldzisher, J.M o a The Pharmacokinetics of Rthynyl MeltnVeens. A Nevi aw. Contr,acepti on, 12 t 3) t 283-2E4, 1977. V. Halton, E;D. , Casc i ano, D.A. , Ai thaws, Z.R. and Plant,, H. D. e INetabal i rr of I7a-ethynylestradi of by Intact Liver Parenchymal Cells tool oterd from the Nweee and Mart. J. Tow i cal . Enrvi ron. Health, a.r 9 --963, t 9w 10. Fbrni ng, C.D. , thenct, J.P. and Hrrl ton$ E. D. a Toxic Agents Reuul t i ng 4ram the Ox i dati vas Metabol i sw of Steroid NWmones and Drugs. 0. Tox i col . l nvi ran. Hoal th y !le 341-361 , 1978. 11. Helton, EMD. , Hill , D.E. . Bough, O.J. , Lipea, 8.w. , King, J. W. , ar, , Morning, E.C. and Thenot, J.Pe a C omparati va Metabolism of Di ethyl st i 1 bestrol In the Mouyee, Rhesue Monkey and Chimpanzee. J. Irax ical . Envi rsrn. Health, Jv 482--483, 1978. 12. Helten, E.D. , Hadd, H.E. ,, Williams, M.C. and Goldxiehrr, J. W. i @ynthesi s of l7A-D-gl urcapyr"arnosi duran i c Acid of 17a-ethynyl estrad i of . J. Steroid Di ochem. , je 237-238, 1979. f M 7S ''? 1 h COWAN V. WLTON9 Pit.b. sage 13 of 1 f ` PLOLICAT I s (Continued$ P.ftg"s E.p. q "Ills poE. , Lip*, E.W. and Kings J.W. s Jr. a Metabolism $h tho 00japus M'Imk*y and Chimpan2@0 a. M�nviron. Path. Toxiceyl . It" 1 . HoltiMs E.p. , "th,e D.J. , King, J.W. , Jr. , Thaenot, J.P. and horning, R.eo l Notabol 1" of di ethyl st i l beatr al in the C3H mouses Chromatographic `. 1"te" f 4W that 0"nt i tati ve Mal yai s of DES Metabolic Produtts. rMteret os s ALO) W1-484 s 1970. 81 l ikkdr, W. , 4r. , Holton, E.D. s Li pe p 8.W. , Newport , I ssa k s T.J. and Dailey, 3.R. s Transp l acantal Ph areacoki net i cs and I. p4ttaol i sm of Di*thyl sti l besterol and 178--Estrad i of In the Pregnant Rhesus W04ey. J. Cline •Endocr i nol . Metab o, =(5) 1 S8l-W8, 1990. Ili. mod, N.E. , Dl l kker, MIS and Hel tnn, E.D. s The Synthesis and F Cr &Cteritatien of the Plucopyrarnosiduranic Acids of I fib-*thVnylvstwadi al-i78. J. Steroid Ri ochem. , ,fit i 107-1114, 1990. 171. 464tano, Leg Sl i kkar, M. , Hill , D.E. and Helton, E.D. M Ethynyl Cj"vfts of Ift-othynylestradiol In tho Rharsus Monkey. Drug Metabolism 40 jN8itiani . 1(0 r 129-134, 1981. Igo pUi Iers E.D. , Yatts, D. , Hel ton, E. D. and Hobson, W.C. s D9 ethyl stiIbestrol of Bonadotropin Pottorns in Infant lihesus Monkeys. J. Stbhoi d Di acherai stry s L214971 1901. i9. Clwk, J.D. , Williams, K. , Upchurch, 8. , Eri cksmon , M. , Helton, E.D. awd Wkayeri ch, ii. f Effects of Estra►d i al•�17--A on Nuclear Occupancy of th* Estrogen Receptor, Stimulation of Nuclear Type 1 18i ties and Uterine Growth. J. Steroid Diochem. , jAs 323-328, 1982. 20. Halton, E.D. s 91medical and Toxicological Evaluation. l," i.�.,,, Dit—rnL_satioas Couroe Handbook Sari** Number 206 (H4-4882) , Practising Law Institute, 1902. 21. Hefil ton$ E.D. , Purdy, R. and Williams, M,C. s Anal ytl cal Methodology for Estrogen Ansl ysi s. pp. 259-"3 Lae Handbook of Cart i nogons and Oth- Haaardous Chomicals, ftwman, M. (Ed, ) ,, "anal Dekker , Inc. , Now York ,, NY, 1982. 22. Jurek, A: , AlthaMusl I.R. , ill i kker a W. and Halton , E. D. A Chronic Effect* of Di ethyl st i i bestrol on Estrogen Metabolism in the Mouse. J. Envirwa. bath. Toxical . and Oncology. 16(3) t 1983. 23. Hadd, N.E. , Alikker , M. , Miller , D.W. and Helton , E. D. e Studies an Synthesis of the Anom,er i c Pair of 17B-Gl ucuron i lots of Ethyry 1 eestradi of . Jo tteroi d Ei acNw. Lae l-7, 1983. rw,yl' �y,se gin' `v Ewa AA anAlk D. WRLYM i 1-14.D. 0"e 14 0 16 OWLItATIOW8 4CWtitrued1 * �ton* Robe a� Halt, J.H. N The Diagnosis or Mi sd i agnosr s of �canal Disease, Pranti ce-fial 1 s Inc. Labor Rel at i dwis Guide Dsrvi co, 170. iianwwry 1"3. . 161tong 3.d. s 3ieoadical and Toxicological Evaluation. Oecuastioni i j Course Handbook Bur i** No. 237 (H4-+4194) , Practising LAM net two 9003, Sib. 1401 ten, Rdmmrrd D. and Harl t, Joan H. a $Evaluating the Causation of p m*4k*j 4j bi mmae g Prenti ce-4Ha►l l w Inc. Labor Relations Guide Service, `Mill o fiAM 173-f79g, "arch t994. 37. 0 hooMige J* , iiastlandi J. and Holton, E. s Effect of Short-Term A"tritstratieft of 4WAum 3atchor'in on Pthesue Monkey. Food Chemical Ten 1 sol ogy, Vsl . 2Z1131 v 931--934 i 1994. U. Hol ton$ Edgard D. ,$ Joan M. Halt and Frederic H. Newton o Huepar solvent Intmications An Industrial Problem. P►r*ntice-44al1 , Inc. Labor Relations ba Mid Sri co a Pp. 313-31 G, June 1993. "I Holton$ COM a Westland, J.A. and Mueller, M. a Placental Tran%4*r of j PenteshlorMplh to Mews Monkeyf. In press. Ecotoxicoloov Atli �view�wrtal �,�. 30. Hol tan, E.D, a The Potential Carcinogenicity of Plant Pol yphonal i c so Submitted to the J. of t:pp l i ed Toxicology. 31. Helton, E.D. and NWmton, Frederic* Industrial Aolvent Exposure and CNN Tooicdlogy. In preparation. o Hol tong E.O, and Newton , Frederic. Acute and Chronic Pesticide Intvetiaation. In preparation. I i ' i • I Iw • H&TONO LDS I f aA#t!aaa, 14.C. , Hel ten g K.D. and edi ds i Sher'i J.W. l The Metabolise of � {' h I"tr&dierl In Win. hndocrinal . 211315. Ouppl . 1974. Not tan, g.A. , Oil t i i"s j M.C. and ftl die i sham, J.US a The POstabol i s• o4 elrnyl fttradi of in Women. Jo Steroid bi ochem. 2t 33fl, 11074. 3. Hutton* t.D. t Williams, M.C« , Rea, P.N. and Hadd, N. a Urinary and Liver Conjugates in 17arwirthynylestradioi in Woetr n., ,i.Ke Proceedings of to d INIth Annual Meting of the Endocrine !mi ety, 1976. , 4. Hel tune lK.D. and Ow9h, D.J. r Excrati or and metabolism of tri t i ated Di ethyl sti l baestrol In the Re"l n C3H Mouse. J. Tax i caul . Envi rare. Hea l f be NeltAng 1E.p. , Wi1liaosl ON.Cw and Aoldsieherg J.W. a Oxldatave Metabolism and De-athVhyl at i on of 17a-rethy nyl**trod od i al in ftboon Liver Mi rroee s. J. To"i tol . Envi wean. Health, llr 3D3-354. ♦; Hill Ow 1t. , Bel ton, E.D. , Lipe, G.W. , Notsport, B. D. i Oc i st ak , T-J, Bailey* 1*14. and young, J.P. a Transpl aeerttal Tran' sf or , fttawol i to and Phormpacokinetics wf 01 ethyl attibostral Wkft) and Elrtra►diel-179(U) t ; fto"aert 1 hOsus Monkeys. Ws Proceedings of the 60th Annual Merit t nq of qq hw ri no fteletyp 14700 13. tisddj 'H.E.' and Hol 1ten, 1'l,.b,. t Synthesis iknd Characteri Yeti on of 3 ai d 17-D -gl ucurani de Tri acetyl Monnowthyl 17&-ethynyl estradi al 179. Procosdingo of the bDth Annual Meeting of the Endocrine Society, 1970+' ' 0. Wlikke'r , U. , H1119 D.Kw , Halton* E.p. , $xiszwk , T.J. , Wet art , G.D,• '« Uptr* O.K. and Dailey, J.hwa C.mpairivon of the Transplacentai Pharacok i Marti es of 01 ethyl sti l besterol MO) , Di ethyl sti l bootrol � MsnOVY Weuran s'ds t!' M) and ltstr•adi al 279(1<a) in the Rhasi is M mkey. Joint iWO ftmtinq ere the Areerican I1ociety for Pharmacology and Sisperivantol Thoratpauticreigoeiety of Toxicology. 10. !eat tan e q L. , Rl i kkorY, W., „ M! 11 , D.E. and Halton , E.9. i Metabolism c 17ar-0thynyl eextrardi eel by the Rhesus "ankey. Actopted , 19799 "jet i ng of the smioty of Toxicology, US Dl i kker, U. , Hi 11 , D.E. 9 Al thaus, Z.R. and Helton, C.D. s Compar i son of the Placental Transfer of bmw Synthetic and Natural Estrogens In rhueaan Pripatas. Submitted, blot Annual "eating of the E+ndaeri nw lkm l►et y, 1979. 12. Ill i kkner, W. , Hi l 1 , D,.E« , Li pr, Ow Ne r merwport , E.A. , and Holton E. D. j HFLC and Field ftsorp t i eery !lass Spectroscopy of Rhesus Mankey EE4 Conjugstasw Accepted, 1979 "voting vi the Cociaty of Toxicology.. ,S, tH�•PP _ 21 v r`S' 1l ► D. HILTON* •.0. Pace I& W r i i AWItA T8f (Cyanti nuod) YJ. Hrdai, H.Wo , Sl ikker, W. ,, Jr. , Halton, E.D. , Hill , D.E. and Rai tano, Lot The Identiflcation elf they 17-glucuranide of Ethynylestradiol in Urines o4 the fabl a ltrrkey Fol l owing Radioactive Ethynyl eotradial "'�r• AdeAnistra►tione Submitted, blst Annual Meeting of the Endo=rina Society , 344 Yates, Dog 61Wst1andi J.A. , Pul1ar, d.11. i Hodscm, W.C. * and Holton, IteV* s Alteration* of Wootatal Fharwa--ol ogy in Rhesos haikwya Resulting ?;roa jjl jitWo and k%m strl Expcwure to Dinthylati 1 bostrol. Whrai tied, Endarrine Abstract, 1*9+i . !S. Salth, O.M. , b� rj, R.D. , Hnerb*19 C.14. , TruJ i l l o, P.A. and Halton ,, r t.D+ l Tow i cal oq i cal Evaluation of aQa Product Fed to Boof Cows on j Kale with Dwaiamt RoragM, Submitted, Am&rftan Society o+ Animal Sti�caat, ��i. i i`. Fuller, S.d. 9 Yates, D. , Marlton, E.D. and Hobson, M .C. s Diethylsti 1- • Destral Revwaal of Sona otrapin Patterns in Infant Rhesus Monkeys. Sth International SW*osium of t1m Jo, of Steroid Diochem. , 1991« 17o Helton* E.D. , Westland, J.- , Hrel i m, 8. 9 Hobson, W. and Mueller , W. a Transplacental Pharmacology of rantachlorophenol (PCP) In Rhaesus Monkeys. Submitted, Jai apt AMET190T ranting, Louisville. KY, 1962. Vol . 2, Me. 29 The T'ox i col ogi st, July, 1992. 'i -.rr. ^� y J�A •• r 1. 1 J 'I•i' n��ii}�•�n R� l i.In ;'r1r' � 'a:n�r�''.r•:n � �'`��f?ia��\�ul'jo°vr�'i'r�•.p��..;;�.,r .y''K � y F14 9 ol ATTACHMENT 2 r. .T, f• 1 ' .�•1 1. ,��., f �f 1 � •�1• a ..�� J ,'� � � .. r r � h i 1 � APPENDIX E SEISMIC DESIGN OF STORAGE TANKS EA lS6ope Table E-1—Zang Coe tl 4ettt n.is amwndix establishes recommended minimum -- ZON Miami Z „'a per basic re.juir~ments for the design of storage: tanks sub- � c4efocient tie,* Jetc&, to shWe load when specified by purchaser.'71itse o.tsrr�.....:.................... t requkemeah represent accapted practice for,sp,Qlica- 0.37S.. .. ,.... t tiooii to flat bottom tanks. However, it(a rt w niied that 01$.. . ....... .. ...••. • •��..." 3 ahor prtcsdtsres and applicable to cta:s or additional I.0 .....:...... .. � ;Ouiroments may be specified by the 'purcha'ser or Mow No ea O,quakc design "Wi ed for Zone 0, r Jurisdictional authorities. Any dcviattion him. the re- quiremtits herein must be by agreement between the f put;c asar and manufacturer. Z sazane met agent front Figure E-1 and Tabie'E- ! essential fscitities factor. A factor of 1.0 shall E.2 ltltroductlon be used for all tanks except when an Increased Ue design procedure considers two response modes I factor is specified by flit: purchaser, t : is of the tank and its contents: (1) the relatively high fee- , rtcaarimcndcd that flat 1 fader not.exceed 1.5 quancy AmpiXeed risVonse to lateral ground motion of and that this rnaximurn value be applied onli'to the tank-she)l and roof together with a portio# of the tanks that must provide emergency post earth- liquid contents which moves in unison with the shcU, • quake service to the; public. and 2 the.re:lativel 16w frequencyam lilleA response Cr and 'Ca naleteratl ca.rthquatke.. 'f6rce coefficients of **Porti6nl of the 1 quid contents the fundamental d'=tCrrnined per E,3.3. • W total werii;ht of tank shelf in pounds. slashing roodo.-The &xiSn require's the determination " t- of the hydmdynamic mass associated with each mode X, �height �i:ern bottom of tank steel! to center'.'Of gravity of shell, in fret and the lateral forcat.stud overturning moment Applied gravity total weight of tank roof(fixed or floating)pleas to the shell resulting from the response of the masses to portion of snow load, if any, as specified by lateral ground motion:provisions are included to assure stability of the tank -shell against overturtyiarr$ and to . purchaser, in hounds. . JY� "fetal height of tank shell, in feet: preclude buckling of the tank shell due to longitudinael • Wa --weight of effective mass of tank contents wh;+:h • •exsmpresao�rr. . Na pea lxivru amitsrluda:ii're:gairding the i. treaxe in moves in unison with tank shell, determined Per E.3.2.1, in-pounds. hrnop tan=Ian clod to horiaontal and vcrttratl 'seismic forties iit this does anot affect shell thieknd'-M for the - Xa "beight•from bottom of tank shell to tent road of -.lateral tore, cetfici�ents specified herein, tak=r►g into lateral at:::mac farm applied to Wa,dctet-mined per E.3.2.2, In feet. act cunt ge strally accepted inacased allowable strtss 1 weight of effective mass of first mode sloshing and dtut;tllity ratios.. contents of tank, determined per E3.2.1.•in pounds. E.3 Dealgn LvadIng . . L3.1 OVERWANiNG MOME1NT2 The basis for thc-m provisions together with the formulas f«t the The overturnin= moment due to seismic forms Apo- JWs„cur,,, is Plug a E-2 through E•3 p1m irs omecirm for akv- plied to the bottom of the shell.sh3ll be determined ax lacing otlwr seismic erfcCts am indutxad in the papa"Haab of Schmiic follows: Desip hm'Woat for Welded Steel Storege To aka"by R.S.Womiat and'W. W. Mitchell, IP78 Pr+o eCARfy—Ae taw Department, J►i' 21{fitK'A+Ct1V,N, # C,W,,X, + CaWfX:) sM overturning moment delerminea per this pariosph u that aP• Whe rat' plied to the bondrn of the sheU only.The tank foundation is subiaeted M moverlutroin momenta lied to bottom tank to an additions) overNming moment dun to talent displace Pic ag g iiP om o the unit caotcau which may vesd to be erim�dcred in the 4c*JSa d shell, in foot-pounds. acme F~dadoms rude ad p0e•siupportad aoncrt.i. mats. ' E-t q" t cip mA v.l . • ff • � ram••..._ �,f O �I 'rl r. /1 .� , 1.� Ie1~' ir,'•. ,•.1r r•V' � � eY lh � � y �. � MR y 1 1• A 1, I q r n •'�� µ �� k •'1�° �� ri' �� it ��' � � ��,. 1��' . �'� � �•�� •�� 1 �:r �A�r,�,,,�h� 1 ' ti , * • u S I�, too *r T^ M: Al • s r'. „ v' Who Sna TAms /WI AIL Pomar a S} 0 • v ALASKA it �• w 4 1 +i MILES r HAWAII i 4 a �0 60 to MILE Figure F.-I-- Conflnuid h G K Sri i pop*, 1 r r r 1l 4 V14 AM srA► 6AP0 aid Xs Isheight from bottom of tank shell to c.:ntroid of 1.0 literal felur itc force applied to ► ),determined WZ pot IE.3.2.2, in fett. W 0.6 A. r -LU IFFICTIVII MASS OF TANK CONTENTS - . I:3.3.1 The affective masraa Ws and Wy, may be Oft Itrmfmd by multiplying Wr by this ratio Wj1Wr and W WillOn f i3iv*y, obtalftd from Figure E-2 for the r r 0.2- il+hrre: Wr•a total weight of tank contents (prod!,tct specific 0 1.0 2.0 1.4.0 4.0 510 6.0 7.0 8.0 &ftvity spttclfed by the purchaser), its pounds, DIH D *nominal diameter of tank, in feet (tee 3.6.1.1 Figure- E-2 Neste 1) H *hpig t, in ft:et (see 3.6.3.2). 113.3.3 The heights from the bott,.)m of the tank theil to the centraids of the lateral sea-gnic farces applied to e ..�.. Wi and Ws.Xs and Xx, may be determined by multiply- H ` ing H by the ratites XtIN and XjiH, respectively, ob• 0.6 tamed from Figure: PW for the ratio of DIM. 01.3.2.3 Tie Curves In Figures E-2 and E-3 art hayed X2 0A on a modiitation of the zquations presented in ERICA N XI Technical fnformedon Do.-ument 70241. Alternative)Y, 0. Wj, W2,Xt, and X2 may be determined by other analy- tical prac edur+es based or;the dynamic characterist;es of 00 1 0 2 0 3.0 4.t7 5.0 6.0 ' : 0 8r0 tank.the 01H 9.34 LATSHAI. FORCE COEFFICIENTS F12urt--E-3 V-3.3.1 71e lateral fon*coetlident Cl shall be taken at 0.2+4, Whrtrr: S 'asita amplification factor from Table E-2. .32 TIC Isteral force mef` dent Cs shall be deter- 7- -a natural period of first mode sloshing, in sec- ed as a func*n of the nati-ml period of the first onds T may be determined from the folowing mrde stoshl", T, and the soil conditions at the tank expression, W un Ir Is less than or equal to 4.3: k t-factor obtained from Figure E-4 for the ratio C3,3.3 Alternatively, by agreement between put- ;hen r itc:3rateter thin d.S: chaser and manufacturer,Ct and C,may be determined from response spectra established for the sp"ific site of the tank and which may also take into account the dy- C.s 1.3$ $ namic characteristics of the tank, The spectrum for Ct should be established for a damping coefficient of 2 p+erc::n. of critical and scaled to a maximum cmplified amcleratiort of 0.24 times the acceleration of gravity. t T+ttNricat 1rt°w"W'+t01 ot"�""`e+u nova. N'xre't ttetietors and The tptctrurn for C2 should correspond to the spectrum Wanhgoaaxa,, prcPred by t oetttk•d Ahrtaft Ca"ratkw., and tto om k Nar-vi, lrt,. Pw the U.S. Atook Energy coemWon, for Cs exotpt mooJified for a 'damping c!wfficient of 0.5 Avgw 1%3• percent of critical. Hai! Pr y+m lo r Pt P " i 4 'F • y;y WurAD $ria Tom# son OIL $rya 1 R•� d.4 IMslatancte To "rturning L4.1 PAnktaw to the overturning moment at the bdttolrt �( Ihe shell may be provided by the weight of 0'6 tiro tank*411 and by this weight of a portion of the tank Contests adjacent to the shelf for untrichored tanks or 0•$ by aiftWrage of the tank shell. For unanchored tanks, 0.5 p 1.0 2.0 3.0 a.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 6.0 ON portion of the contents which may be utilized to t overturning is dependent on the width of the bot• ►,r plate nodes the shed which lifts oft the foundation �iuro"E-4 and malty be determin id as follows: der of the bottom, the width of the thicker plate under 4 ta,, 7.94, f1/ ,,,�,'H the shell in feet, messured radially inward from the eattSpt that wL shall not exceed 1.25 GHD. shell, shall be equal to or greater than: Where: 0,0274 t ! wt. = maximum weight of tank contents which may be utilized to resist tie shell overturning moment, `�, in pounds per foot of shell circumference, hell Comprossion tb - thickness of bottom plate under the shell, In E.6.1 UNANCHORED TANKS inches. 7bc maximum longitudinal compressive fora at the Fs w minimum specified yield strength of bottom bottom of the shell may be determined as follows: plate under the shell, in pounds per square inch. Wher; — -- is equal to or less than 0.785: C design specific gravity of liquid to be stored as Ds(w, i- wi) V. sped ied by the purchaser. 1.273M EA-2 The thickness of the bottom plate under the D; shell, rb, shall not exceed the thickness of the bottom s1*11 course,at y4 inch,whichever is greater. Where the When is greater than 0.785 but lass bottom plate under the shell is thicker than the remain- + '"�1) than or equal to 1,3: b may be computed from the value of the following Taabli'E-2--911te Amplification Factors parameter obtained from Figure E•S. Sao Prefiie $41t Atnpl rkation ... + .4 ri De - w+r.. Fuld1 Notes w, + ',yt A I'd t 1.2 2 C Ls s Vklhan 1.5 < 1.37 th► Aown t•S 4 M(w,+ wJ Notts: . -!; $pit Wit•A,is a profile witrt: !,, •w + w � + 490 u a. hack of any ekarackek0c. either shale-Swot �e of crystr teinc in t ,d �1 _ i nalwit. Swot ataladd asay bs aharertit►ited by a shear nave D:(w, + p,-G� vewocitM$/slier than 230i0 letspes seewtd,of tb. Sunk a im"itions wiare do toll&0 it ICU[hart 300 lees sew the s ll types overlying t"t we stable deposits of st►ads,,grav h CA, o+stiflclays. When --" --- is greater than 1.57 or -- :. Soil haft B is a profik with cobesionless of stiff caay Condi• D (w, + wt.) 121 twos.im!ttding silts where Ike wit depth ext5eedt 200 fete and the sail types *"dyins rate are stable d-,p"ts of s,tndi, grove A, or stiff exceeds F. (see E.3.3) the tank is structurally unstable. `Soil Fronk C is aprersle with sot!•trrct+tdi�im•stitf clays SO sands, It It necessary to either..itMaer�tsriUd by 30 tee,or mwe or soft.to.nwdiv to-Mitt clay with or 1" Increase the thickness of the b'sttom plate under the i. to leattervening'oas w e libbt mil prortkn of sand ris notrknown in suflessiciew Wail shell, 16, to increase wL providing that the limitations of to/netti+dhe the ,oil praft Inn, Wl profile C sbail be asawmrd. EA.i and E.4.2 are not cxccedcd, ol• F,w t Yt ! loftr* "fe ' Y —APt STi M Mo 650 t Q,4 ,......�.. stress, F., determined by the following formulas for P �S which take into account the effect of internal pressure � due to the liquid contents: WHEN 1 5 +� t M 8.3 ca ++�►t� 1.57 When value of GNP: is grevef than or equal to 10',. if 8.p F, I When the value of GMb is less than Itr: 4.0 l0° t IF, -- - - — �N 2.5 !� + 6W w �---- •--�4 .7e Except that in no case shall the value of F.exceed 0.5 D2 where: t -thick nem excluding corrosion allowance,of the 0.8 1.0 112 .1.4 i 's bottom shell course, in inches. F, w maximurn allowable longitudinal compressive 02 (Wt + WLj stress in the shell, in pounds per square inch, Fo, m minimum specified yield strength of the bottom shell course, in pounds per square inch. Figure -E-5 E►S.4 UPPER SHELL COURSES 2. increase shell thickness, r, or if the thickness of the lower shell course calculated to 3. Change the proportions of'the tank to increase the insist the seismic overturning m..:nent is greater than dianieter and reduce the height, or the thickness required for hydrostatic pressure, both 4. anchor the tank per E.6. exclvdinS corrosion allowance* Then the coilculaied W wre: thickness of each upper, sheil course for hydrostatic b a maximum longitudinal shell compreceive force, pressure shall be increased in the same proportion, un- in pounds per toot of shell circumference. less a special analysis is:made to determine the seismic w, w weight of tank shell and portion of fixed root overturning moment and corresponding stresses at the supported by site;!, in pounds per foot of shell bottom of each upper si:ell course. dicomfertme, E,$ Anchorage of Tank* $,5.2 ANCHORED TANK$ When anchorage is considered necessary, it shall be Tfa maximum longitudinal compressive force at the designed to provide a minimum anchorage resistance in bottom of the shell may be determined a: follows: pounds per foot of shell circumference of: 1.273 M + a A The stresses due to anchor forces in •,hc tank shell at the !'E.0.3 M"M1IM A►LLOWADLE $M$LL points tof attachment of the anchors shall be invcsti• COMPRESMON gated. Thd maximum longitudinal compressive stress ir, the 'Aw a dtsipt promdvrt ace Pan w11,Ahchcu doh Choi",a VI$tt:et .�. !' le Enelfreerint D4trr--V0lV nt 2, USCM 1nWo nefto co the Dt- Shell --L shall not exceed the maximum aiitrwable *rle of thtt strvtlurt:s", pubttsed by the CO Mrs UC of Sigel state jet 1'teelvc�ra, Ar�et�wn trvn•nd Steel lniti:ute. y`- aA .�M?1�M,°•fill .l'• ' ,dim VWLDea STtel UWA FOR Oft STOAAO! S•7 *" �.7 Piping sited to minimize or avoid overflow and damage to the Suitable flexibility shall be provided in the vertical roof and upper shell due to sloshing bf the liquid con- direaion lot all PIP S in attached to the shell or bottom tents. W the tank. On unanchored tanks subject to bottom E.8.2 The base of the roof supporting columns shall uplift, piping connected to the bottom shall be frea to be festrained to prevent lattril movement during earth• lift with the bottom or shall be located so that the horn u mtal distanes mcuured from the shell to the edSe of quakes. When specified by the punhascr, the column: the awl"JaS roinfommsnt shall bo tho width of the shall be deli ncd to resist the forces caused by the slosh• tom hold dolxn as calculated in E.4.2 plus 12 Inches. ing,of the Liquid contents. E,8.3 'Cho additional vertical farces at the shell due io ' 1.8 Additional Consideration the seismic overturning moment shall be considered in E.6.1 The purohasar shall specify any freeboard de- the design of the tank foundation, r '1 f;r J• 1 k' .a v , IT �� rl,,ly+ I �• �� Ar �ay�,��,,• Sri •♦ � •� ,• d � � y •'I�, ' �'S�w,�ti; �7 �t i`p �Jf�y �� ', � � �F ;7�'y'J Aw It.� Y�,�, 'j�� ••�� ', M�'a w:yip.}�� 't� �r �. •�h � . �� .. �v�' Y- ,� a.. 7�,�� "�.,"�.r C1...r •�.�� '•�I'�' )'',��S•��6arp,'�di 1°'�,.�.'lS�:��•'{ `.u.♦ ;;�y";��.�..�•. ��,�...�'' `. �I ry�1'w�h�� 'r" •�� :�r;�` i.��.��'�Yf��r I, •'I I, C: r ATTACHMENT 3 i i� .II . F ` ' � t 1� ' � ^ I� �bY�Y 17. � ,�� ,��', �/ �.Y�,�V�!!r'Ary�i.,�. ,.� '• • A'��y�,!,kp °��i r"•�`�.%M y�r•�l' � '•T'�.��•,'.��.,�,/ � Ir � F t y i 'y�l.�T',•117,�x'o' 7�' � � I following District Mopps aM's) show the location of the 52 separate parcels within the Cit of Huntington r, goach currently *oned -G1, combinwd wi h oil . I , . „ DISTRICT ? BEM OF PARCELS Y ZONED -01 hy, OX 3 20 � 4 2 ; 3.0 2 i 12 1 i DR 13 4 DX 22 3 EV 24 1 DM 31 1 Dot 38 4 DM 39 d ' TOTAL 52 1, ,t i 1 x ll�/ r rT i L 7 � 4 F �• i rr• r 1 ZONING DM P- r SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP - 6 - II INOT C; ► MOItp rMOM t, I7Yf0 ..4 .•*40k+1 am ■ rrfr atv COVMCM 0110wA1644; Nfl, 114 ■rr w►. •twrl�f ar t or .w M.�..�.a r� 1f tYrCITY OF ■t.11. rl Tir•/1 tY•MU IIM 1•�': r•�r� LEGCNG� EX) rr ta.r►./suwwwr wrlar HUNTINGTON EACH r•' � "1Iffa,trd.Nr.ar• nt. •a [� r.wrlls PIr�►!• ($� Nirfrt�a .M■OM11rL FfrwR �• • � (� lYfr►tlwYfrlw Mlf►it !►N COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ;: W^,"Mlrtaftoftfmv � 1• rM .IM•ra Mlw►Ir M4fN.kft N.f>N tq•' �� lr►.fwlnl. firlrl�K Ih ■M i 0.Y��j■■.,��WW i NI�IbMMt�"No"I ft M1MR �� •1 1• i dl.�/f►I/IIw1Ylr11,11-41"It,// = N r*� , _ , }ice �. ...0.MM it`a.l w>�Iklw r InM11 1 ff J IILAItl ab I I �� ._1 L_ -- _ ` r• •q n�-i .1 ._ '...w•w r+,n Iw l:;t) u % $Y.►.et --»--Wwwllr�rtwew- RA•0 01 42 �1 R2R2 MN �ooL p MI-A Cf{Y4- IYI I R2 ,,.aM urf lar flftt R2 t RZ " R2 R9 R 2 41 •� R2 M� Rx 1 R2 Lfit � �. ` �tl�u+arrnlcr LI i CZwO• ;'I JJ i,r,lll/NhA...rM� FF R2.0-PD T Q�•;i �}(r1 R� R2 R4 RP R$ C2-0-VD r G2-0 , '�k ,r1r...,-J '..� 1+ �� ,�41 n .■ ■ ,ail ) iji 44 RZ-0 P0; t Rt;•0 RI JR Awl- 1,0 rr: o•l:o I1 f R2 R2 R2C -�-CD C4 —c Rt•0 .. � R2-C1-•CO : o • CF � CD � lt'Tl�wnlrn ,r, RA RZ C2 rllw sale 1 -==� M-0 R2 F-E cu -° CF-E 26 mo CO-0 lu CD-0 R4 •CD-0 Q RE-0 Re-0 (. -0 ' fir CF-R RI RI Al RI RI -CO-0 r .CD-0 4 el N . w '0 'o '0 '''-moo R2 4� ° Q -0 no '� b 1f 11 vc RI itl Rf FRIi Au -o � �r � t tAt x ; Iill r i '�Aii, M�• r. � ZONING DM 3 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP M 3-6-11 OTT aftwo m ha 154CITY OF e ■atl� t+ v ` ►eon p,aa,.-f,w ENfENt rEr.l txref f�tliAN�t fKa I T-82 W d" t-3•ti f o tiN flte4w moo an y f tRffif+ �. It1!i•IfiMt t fN I-► ILsn R k" so s" 1t-It-ft 0-1+ t" t•YO f t-m qN 1.0! �!•. �%*HUNTINGTON BEACH 4a1 r• " ihf ►wnIµttwlAl�lt fMwa��.s�.arrllE�lrt.rf awftttNtMwwale.w�wrtYwrY t1 Y w�►N.wlMMiff f ORA �!Itthff .IYI+If t I�aillf/c!•it Mrtt t frtt�tf NG S COUNTY CALIFORNIA ;«. =LM wrwrriifw. 1.3"n e` I-I-rf TI-it 110. maw aw W" sdww 9'13.12 Wo 0" �tI11rR t-f-f. M-ts Ira fA rlriwt�.ai�� .- rr f-e•11 Mn Imo. a OM�I��fJNM af�lY/fm •f 13-i0 Ml.10 rt amfwwftra faun E r • •t t-w•'iq rYl1 Im •/.* illlwgAitR•/n 1 I GARFIELD f•1.• Ri+r1f t[0[t AVINuir ~ cz - M sill . Err f t w frrMf ••t!rc-chrft. Ra dw IL -.h'vYf k.. 1 I has- O rrtrrw�Mlt•r. , 1 ' R3-0 Ra-a� RL01 �..r .• - 1 RI 1 RI M� •3 1 - R /ry�y. 4� Fit RI RI f Etta aW fv t Ft i �• ..� ,•. nab RS o � �-, OI i o RI 'i`.r 'li, RI-0 1 vj �4y R , FBI.O mrw e+.tt+K r�w; r 1 rfa f . I r,. l j r✓11' M Ar TLC.*,•Y �.� 'j Y 0 4*.•,,'w' omb • „ �1. IRYI IY• 4 ,.�+ ��, � � , •� � � � .� \ � `fir• WW'{ • +I I Y J 1 DM 4 " ECT.10RA !, DISTRICT MAP 4-6-11 vc 5-6-11 CITY OF a" � t�rr�"419 rt.hum +„ a -X ft•1•fm 1141� GTON B EACH .bt•N COUNTY. CALIFORNIA ,4 �� mw mw LOr�l�wra w► ofHew+M,anae � , W •tom % 00, .�+ ,. 00 fi t s i r � � S r - • ' � 1 1l t \�V 1•\ , R `Pa' f d r 10 r f4 ' 1~ ��MhM+IMtrw••�.r.�+r..r.,rN►wrwrr rrrr��.� , r.mrw , PLANNING `� ZONING + DM Ill � FvTIONAI. O ISTRIC T MAP r I0-- G- II trlc.0 y,i` �r.W n�rO:rni nl Uelf r�ol,n,r Y.fl.ir C.I)wool w tm. Y1t1 FJ .YO01TIO O"Ifr[II 1. 1/1 Jw I.. C1. 11 1.1t�wK�r 1•c:.N.r.a.u■ C17. c 10111l 0111):91/U $4o I$1 �L1 X1a1,Kyalr l•.UU/Ile ill-41011141 ft,All'-6 -1r l••,,ri11r 1i.1•i+..�1•,Y I.11 MOW WM64i( "I+Ir r"wo 1,,(1.63 wl W I�I.I 1M Yw•Il niM r�r.w.l.•I ''}}'' j' '1 l'y' r1� (' '1" N' 4v� - •.J-'UN ! Nr0 .�.1-�.A (j'H' 1 LCr6%. LoI1KJi■� \sti.lrr 1} rl ll.l Iri1 rirN Y',ull• � '1�f ft.�1 �1� 'I� I�M:,1�y 110 I�>)I [hM•li. M1.•.1 1 I11 .YM1{• rIN �' II /111 1/•11•� r1.7:1i ilr[•a, /V/I•/11 OI IIYKI ' y,' � N W I1 n r N Iw IYi fl rrl•WIFi•t .r11 r�11 1. 11 n•1 M+i 1�.� I .(�.�� cl� rlwlwriA Iollw.l�'�•\ •sI•lrfI /t1, 1 r+IM �I1 p 1 q w/y({{.i If :1a11•..11 N{rI.l.i l l lC" ro.niAV ( l : U ( h ' } , CALIFORNIA it) 4,0Ylni/ Willi Ilt 1,00010 • NnlY•1c/ •11.A 1 ►.o6V.I.e. w MIK ,�•. 44 / ' 1 1 •.■Iw •i 1.1 r Ml a IN. Yl••1.•111 �'•' `•r •/ ± � N 11 w,a[a•I1 .w She 1.•1 Nfl d■11 r:r U /Mae f-a /1r1 p1d.1Y/wW Wk P.WN41vr M[1 yw1Y1Mt / �I � A `b 1, t•/11 1 ca1dBK/ All PI MAIMATP � tog WIMADMMV G� �► . Nld R4-U- . - o � ��. ' '�� •-`�i '` ,� �r � ill .�;�,, I N , CF-t '� •gyp i CFA r �+ �� .• ge lift 01 r. • I,Ina,It Wf � I •r �^• t din ..,..[ r out Wort: y. anew,{ ,w lb f111 ow MW *iw•n/iwf w.M A 11119.1"f.IalfSly 1N 04 r1.11a ■ M 1•Ck MORI M NY �n-AI1YY��1111�1�K.>♦rtn 1�. DM 12 F","��F r 1, 10 N AI DISTRIC T MAP „`rI AYRN111-lot AYorrlo WiFICK 1.11?0 IIY allJr rs1111 (111 (UJM(R Lle Ulh/eC( h0 1{� 1[l r.aru4/r ullr �l11f{{� I111 (If111r /w rr/a . Cjrp ^�{ •// F ^•I.Y•I I ('1Ln1 WIWIM� 1,�71'.'[J' �� 1 . IhL'F1V 1.ti+ t IM }!f I, h 1 1�YMp 1 r1 14 A 10 •M .... 1,'1:11 1■t tlf •,•I fix IWI 1■La MII �f 14 bill M"w 1..M•t Nltll.'1 ►•f•11 +11 w Ir.1. 11.1■�aauy��111 i wf~. f~•Ii i:ii Irol nlwelrr{1.11•I,Irr/.II■<r YI'1•U h. w 1+k PI/V III/r/ 14M law 1■fl I/17 u•1 KY■Ir■IlrY null +ll►(r rI•elIs 11 1■ 1 A rYl 1MI ISM 1"11 ION (All Ir114Y YIa4:1 a1 MYl Y1W p11/K1 1.11 1 IY •1N If11 tnl I♦Ir q n INI 1111 MVI11.1■+IM rArt Yf+W rlw i11K1 r`' 11 Ia 1.111 IIII I�/I Yrl l+. 4 I/f 11 HUNTING1.10N I• _ 1• M H I■1,7 rW Wyrrl MIu►II'•L MIIIKI .B E A II`l� MMMI/Id I1K1 A � -66YI1.111 I0-8 de N 04 1.Ills / 1 M I':N 4r'Mbll rKa1111{IN(III q■ir■U/1/11{; 1111 V.r nw •I 1" t.•M 1 A Qd () It �1 �1 G 1. C(� U 1*� 1' Y C T/I I� 0 Jl� N I A .,e it 1:•11 » ION ;fl) a t�rWC ISSVN'L'Iu/1�� •L 1a7I r1:1 f••H et 11 IN1 I W W A-ON 0Y11.NK1iL P{IIIK1 7 M N M 41 I 111000 li Yq r- " Iw�r-ra♦ 1(Il Lri�irr w1MAN FIIARI •r:�i rl.l �!. ra..,.r'►N Ir. cl■Irw.� w1.1cr I AI.10 it •111 I6•11 M•1 1101 II«MI.1■11'NI �++f"11•IrWA Y(■f 111u �� IIIbtI•{1►MINI h1■v1Ito"11 a1.M11e■1 Flo Lar"cle■I•r t■L/■WIti;10/ /I•I11 1t1r+I1 aaM++�tII� ION NI IW _- AIM". IYp( tII 11 J i'1 II II t1 IIM W Irr111/4• i"A (fAr'WI«.'11161■f■NCrli/l I lot$ 1 1 11/Ilir 1 At I/FI ■Ilya/iVwMp /1 NLV 11 1111 11/1 It/1 1�11111"L Pm MA It( 1■1 IK,JtI■111■11 11//• Illlf /DAMS AVE. ti ., a11■ ev1 1M Ir./ 1. !' - ! �LJ LMJLr J L_ !,J L..JLJ tI 1 t I I __ 1 ulial-a tir I/.1 // All. •qo'I-ro RI M R•I 1 R•1 RZ`d I t �1L4 aaa% i 4, R I R I II, �r _ ' .t 1019�DT• `_C2 - ,�� '�:`� il)�til ti RI R11�.J"'IRJrR2; Im,- -0 fr4CIF LAtI •v[` «ys:.. 1:'1 1.. „ .. 1 '~.:,hr. s I V 11_ IWIII p0 �•� 1 - (aft FOGY 11 R2 1>�.� 'p _p � — �� Ica /f lii ' �M•" \\ N NIM r AV I !t7t•IU•q 1 11, r~'E \! RI �� —� •0• 0 -0 ~Fo -0 II IRI RI RI _p (I�rla 1';rh�,.-r I, MII MVILI I•�. ��... ..NI I A oil Fill � PLAN( RKU TVK;.CF—R ti CI`—R '' / R 11'�Il:,t.tilll I RI 1i I; I ■ RI I R3 C, of Li 00I i Ak RI r 1 I . N/l0•r I + +a I RI I L N R1 R1 +' 44i5 C11 rowel werle �11 1>LMI A 1 .1 �lrrt■r1 rr1l � Ar f R] CI !r t \• h f ' / d VDIST y I y 1 .r. cnM H-FP2 i � 1 .. . � � � �:lcrrilf !'i�r•iYrilt:ii�t»t i_l ATLANTA /�'! ✓I // �1/ led 1111h.. itb tog NOTV / / M Ar11A1111■e Ar/I■ Willi J f�•r• Mwlfwlr N[[t{r Tor+ r■I/r ��a.1 ■1 NIi1(Ml1 w ■ee I I �• I WE owp-qmp� t «„ PLANNNG ZONING SIC110NAI IIISTRICT MAP 12 --6 -41 i NOTE "willr �,wsl IS,IfIb y; K,yy.4.l ..l w 1111 OF ell 1 f.11MrIL• o4tA.1.hu 11Also IN/ Il-1 .4,16-4 ... ..6wf �CITY "IMAG 41Oh11M0 ow.;[o .710 Id1 11 wlilt'sIs (%I'm16 In! ital. Z•6•�1 NI 014 1.1.1! �►rtl IT{1 w 64. +rrl it •.r -„•1!I 141 NI 1•/•►) ►)•H M�1 lS6f:Mn' 1:•4•al 13,115 all1•r•1S i/•r nil H 7r FINGTON „"" i - •I•:I•Gf !al DU )•IL•7t 11.1 IJM �trrru.-11w rrrw.crl 1•]•4L )I1 IrN B-1./1 /I•• 14C/7 [-, Er1A1 rw Y111.-t4 .IIr11a I.3•94 394 roll 4•!•.I M-11 Will 4.111 a.l 4N1 Ioi♦ 1-11.61 tlal•rr 2604 Rm '04r.r11 owkwu Rill.1 ORANGE, COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1.e� /N 1101 1•11 4!•] 1454 OrIIrIM�11 o.i6. I•Irt.lIq.4LIh11.ji 4•4•10 fl4 II11 f•II•M .,•11 11�1 MYI-l/ {wtt+Y.�.l MIIIYIr M IWq Owyr4M r141pw■yl4 4911 11:4. 6 t]r 1161 1 ftmw�/Kr�ifr r� ti1i.i WIUKT 1•]•M !rC Ilit .1dM.p No.1.4am%NaM 1 N•4/ N•B r♦410 na AMIIrIY;/ PON 4nalNWbl p"11 •.IW.(J N•W1 111E •,�.. •,ar9!:+.•MI .,If N.rwuN';.lag 9-to-br of-WE 1141 h.M�r41eM 0.111 rU 10•l0 1104 �-r "r•�r MI/Mill r.11•r1 t1-11 IVJ1 /ylo•l,nl•All SWU MI ••r•11 11-d 4]r 1r11 DA S I,////////J`' 1: `o•n 71•)i 11ra,1 1 ±LJJI of �RI RI—. kl r--- a r •1 r� rr' ECIFiC 1 ) P.I Ell �'P' AN ; RI RI � Fil , RI 1 RIMCI i RI RI /RI A L RI RI M RI ' 4 RI RI R I SI RI RI RI' rlc4 rf R: Ri 7 10 c rf -p RI -- RI fil R) RI a, ... I RI RI RI 1 lil ems! a RI � j f MII CR-R RI RI RI I,I �I a RI � cmF RI 1. RI }, RI RI 1 I , RI MIA r'F IRI r RI ;C 41 2 •At a W RI - — RI RI 4• RI tiRtll►--- �' ` RI RI if I RI RI RI C�•R RI -( I I M / ��-- ��_ RI RI r�I rtrrroal RI ' ` ` fit RI I F8j JI ' pRl RI I ^ ;( Rt _ al RI RI R / 7 IAa41.4ro►11 _ �_ � Al . RI ,�31 Rom■ RI Ci r r 1l RI l_.1� ,.,q.:• 4,�1 � F-E -RI RI , R I arc. r,•� • ,�. RI 1(11L'M•.}rl!w,r•.w, ,_L�� f�,4 ' `� r��• '��S'1� j�;a�/ �, p RI RI RI RI -';i ;f ' IT RI J RI�_ �1 RI RI 4 .�.� t4r RI RI RI RI 2 XX rf RI �l RI r t f t� rI .1 0 RI oil R I Ell RZ-Po - RI �.._ `� llw..,r�n�her"' �• �...M �.,.�' RI JF RI Rt V Ir"RI �!- RI FBI• C4 �J lop A1kANTA 1 ' Istd1 • , I •awe • :PLANNING I 7-OK AG ' aM 16 SIECTIONAI. DISTRICT MAP 14-6—i I 11111 _ -1 NOTE ff ITY OF A"111 rW.1•II/N •II MrlMlinl /rilM fiil alr tvw� ara..r.a1 w 111 ,�tw�trltr+llt FAUt. w+r4AL rV�R.seN RNO. I �� V xiI �� ■trr ww MMt7.l iPi wl�µ F11AR'1 HUNTING'J."Or� B1�� •� r g + Mlrl }11 litl WY1N Iw.11W 1.1 ` �� I+w,� ;� ifdl rwlr,oFYtrlw'r f1 Y+ , . nM1wrp 1 �i.� WIY•+9'd'iw10 iFwy YC�rr. Fil M.l r� 1i a (ill Irii■'■1f illyylr44 b11.ICr ORANGE COUNTY , CALJF0RNJ�1 Fg� ',7rf � 13, irr.tr °I111 I.wuc11M K'{ _!i1 • w ew1W li Y1 110101641 1•IlI� �Il000 [� Cam°° MW at MU61•.I: 111mm t/racal ALMY Irwo, "a"t u 11.4 rr..µ . I ■I1r.A 1,4041/11:itl W.�l A7111/:I I��•,� I r%■■rir RVA11w1■Wt YII►1■tl IMIW 11/M i l NN AILAhTA L-•�.._ /� / 'TREET• . !*1°' r \, �;ul 111AA 4 R2•PD CZ•FP2 '� � !/ �i,yi ; I?r+(v►� :.11 R2•PD-CZ•FPL- _ DNTi1W4rlr- PL''Xr� ,` `i"X / ' lei,p[1 ... b Cq� MT I T R2 PG-CZ=Fp7 .•dti Pip r1 wO Ar / t: 1, :'✓ a �� b i tip . a rrt-s��Pi• a2•�o-c ' ,° r 4 �. MH-CZ-FP2 �• l;•�r r<�,• % WNTO" SPECIFI:PLANw0 1 •:r -� DIiTklqT A 8e•FF244, i t'��, •,otiti - I • - — Mrlllll�r ■:�li■i��Y/r11111�■�■IY��11. + • t i PLANNW zbNlNr'Y DM 22 S C Cr T I O N / 1 I. D I S `r R I C T Ivy A P A 19- 6- 1 U HOTC' Y�•10.1 •N 1r 1111 OF .L'r !MI r■NI.. b.CITY fLY C11r COUNCIL 001DIN[Art MO. fOf EGZH4 ru �rN♦V...1 r1I0e■n/nu..tr t l,rt♦r t q/M►W1.tI r►t[f p os t■Ia 1 i O,ICwilivull /stAK17. ar rn.wlao "rwo ►Y 14 ; r A N0+ All-Kilt "oou,wm.0 r1LCr perewy I a".tyvMtrv.t /\\ Ji\NfUIKI r[{fts tttHUNTINGTOT A _ .•+�1 /0� 161 ♦.h 110 Y10 Asltdl ORANGE CO C1 N T Y C A 1, I F 0 R N I A �•��SIV ''''' �Ic �` ..1.}I !1•r. 1�sf a� [s.rro nr.w i�1•i�' �0 4" �rW A CL'*-%A AN hl fl, *0— W4 r . , ..- u U i i R1 R I lit -� RI It �1 q rrul N ' fll ` R� c•� VV* - u M a RI "RI r rf �. cos R1 : V 4 ,. R I RI ft I R I FZ! a a 4L L.NI I�I 4r e,r� •� IIIIU U�� 6 Rrl^�o•�r RI 00 , r / �1+ ''//�� `��'r1 �44 cry\(� �r�s+ .{.. }i Pt�,'• !' OF ° b co >• v fibOf ` c� '!•,! I w ♦ b 00 • Lt`i K J /rj� ti t MEN" 1 f .�1 1 , PLANNING � ZONING - DM 24 S E C ,r I O N A l DISTRICT MA P 21- 5--11 "POP190 W'r0. 4.1910 1 .., fral/111/. AA1 1Y IIII r�l{�;A110 cclrll ultsn ecMxu rlcN CITY COOKIL U3401? Ct n0. 191 /Id ./16�b1�A.1 OF .rt MA.II+a cw I1?►.1 M 89- J4K" OMt A ' .1 IY 1-J •{Y 111 CITY I7Y b M5 I!1 J•W 11 VW(A4 1111 .1 Iviw/•Y 11t W •.r 1•I•N N1 ..1 1.1.11 h h A1q / .... • .•1 w1 11•.•II "•" .11. 11�r,ulhfm palwl 1.q 11 II ... 1►1 11 1111 .Ih i NGTON n._ !1. 11. 1.1". IV.. 111. 11r N.wll AIIM MIS\04,Wt HUNT� BEACH 1. N 1.1 1•. f ►01. 4i�.1.�•.! IN ,.1 1.11 It 11.1 111! Gr�rl•I PII/.JYAA pll/[1 +•. .1 Jn. +'1 1.1,. NMI11% fllf CY�tW41.1,M 111//KI . l•1 U/ 1"I I It w w41•I/ IWl fq,1 .1. utl OIA1{rW r 1 14. It�ttlYw.IFI Au•wlfal MTMT `/�, A V A T '+f'•1 2 �'.�(1 110, +•I.17 IY•I M." `/ iiNG C T , Cii L.i.` Lj{ O.,01 101 .*1 ..O..I 11•. 1,. .- .I,Of, tY 1 1 AJ1• 111 I+YI ►•.1•M w1 f.q Il Afvwi+MMlTr P1li.Yn4 f>111K1 +•1-11 14 n,l 1 1•AA N•/ IIIU �� 1•G•N 1�1 ua .;,,I PA•1Ir 110•J �1�NG IAY�I/I;M► MIfYiI 11•M IIN .f 11 u 71• 11.1 1*4 l Y 11 N N•N J„ ■ M411ryj /YNr 1A A/i1.4 IIIi1K1 .•K 1 1t 1; .N1 com w-, O9.611 1RWIh1W //loci 1 .1,A 61.►1 11N � d"%.F'/.A.A1W A\I or* 1.1•N N••. i.11 1.1.10 "A 1:" aD 094y/p11 fAff♦Ir IIINAM1101411-tf0tl 1•M•H Ah-0 .11, ON rdf Al"ALC e*Mott •f N11 Ir Ir1/1 n+. .1•N•H fr1A/1 rff �u OAr1W/wl/OA.lrltoli[l A" N 11 1 i .I in rl t,1A&I .%t r 10 1 L�{ MII.M h.1.rN\W I. I •I� 1J LGgf7i11 • • r� Alit./fit 'r/r/rill/,_��rii�11//�lf�/�!�1 iit..--- 'i_ r RI = RI R I RI - Ii f++J►1► _._ q /1 NIIIc1IS h P" �TIL _ ND % F s f'�'_ RI Rl RIL INISI C11 } 1 i �.-�/ RI RI R1.0 CF-E II RI � R1 ; ' 3 14=n-1 I a �IL N� m L,K PITL ` • 1 1 l� RI I PI RI I 'n ..-� [LARK QI, s".._._ RI l 7 RI RI Fll�� -•---' - o C F-E RI p1 RI rtAD011. AA '�-� II�'.'+!IN:w•.r :;]Kf�'IJ + � �."rr,r--• o� ad, ari IT It RI 1!.••PO _..�. 1 RI �LEl- F&_ L" MH Vt111t1h, - oil r t I RI RI RI ; RI RI PI Y i"I RI I kl lil RI RI J L x x j2h aLt111r by nUOLtc r j �1 1• I / H t� RI RI ..._... R 1 �1/_ --- i I-F'P2.. a I Rli ce A11rp2 I +� RI R I _ R3 RI i s R7 R2 MN l RI-FRZ / 1 CF- R RIDS �Ir ill ill ill � RI 1 d R I'M R) ....fla wir.w ...... RI ( •r w , R I°I`"P'g g .Q)MH RI I Ll R� , A. R / +1 R K w AI loft ROS-FR2 V. 49 9 Ca-FM r �� '_ e ttrt� I'Y n PLANNING ZONING' DM 3' SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 1 26. - %'.50 11 riot: CITY �� AOOITIU .IIrIL II,H�Q •�.In.t rr.1�•.+1 ru •�MIM •. �1..I/w.1.1'tr11W 10 'wl 11.111\' GITT (a.ACll. OIIaA/lat/ r10 YDI / t.1..�u .. ..1 Lft3E rD ��vrp ,,,��_ f I r.t•arlw AtMLK11Mr1 .irA.cr '1Y�.:•r1L1 liS'iL 1 qiW IN H ARAiSS1!!r1.• 11, .�t�1,I rI I7Y0'a4b,trtIWildAl,HUNTING"TON I l" .,] Iw awls sr 1/1rl0.icn A11 04.077 >IIW11'rtyr1lS Y .: Wl«ItW/nIIr I.w.w cww—w N-grORANGE COUNTY, CALlI'ORN1A cr rIn1�'r) wt.wn rccr.rt.tl latc.c.lb1.-u a1.rc• •' I�`� "� I N c cwr r111A•cl 1••70� iii Iw-sM i!M ctwwttr/r.cu It.arvRl.41«cI' rAa/tDdtlA� t11111fR Ir rI 1.11a r•ti�lr / ae. rwa AR-rev f 1 I'111r Z", 7W AAA a rrltir 1 ALOMI:1rr 1 MlOtia LK rt AV OP PF -' C4-MS 10 I C F- IIMW rIR1{IR(Q :i�rl 1(•n�r1'ilf � 1 a M � /1 � � � b i mI MI I a CF-R t' A' J �• �• ' I I MI w R2 R2 �� al � RI� 9 �` CF+E fw MI MI _ I >x a III 1 At Ott t (c 1 J IYY VAR# x 6 S It M wntr u i - t11J rr M 19 M M I �i• Cp RI-Cn R3 T: a w (c ¢ m Fe-CD '/J I—CD •gRl•Cb 3 r A3 IR3 R3� M . D g1AR2MH m R3 :_ C R M i R R2 CA n1ua11u�11 eomwl raA,tl' I R3 ` B � I MI-co ttMt R2 • I � � � 5 I ew4 M� Ali Rx Rz R2 MI-CIS m I m I '� •awl �p �� TAL1119 AVC �+�.wMrtAAu� .�'�i..YU u�r•I�i1 'Y�I��a M IPLANNING � ZONING � DM 38 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 34- 5- II Nul[ C T ADC*frb "SUIT I:. 1110�� Awl - MJ4�n.1 ,. •1, •1/ 1. 1•Ilw• le IPA Ilrlll el TV Cq".AIL Mf11NANCt N0 11i r f1uPr ••ret v. Fwl c Lr.1tN� �YC'tC�S: i.. pM,•J e4LN4t?C�rIJfaL� M rrr w7Ml .a/Isanwk w•r�r HUNTINGTON .• •13 Ui •f0 I•�•1! I�I !i!o�,/,�. i•1 M Wl 111> I•u•rt�[n !eA 1:7�� rl•'wo ►.Iw at .w.oau+l It•!•1• r+0'171411 I•t/•/1 W. rim [uw.I.rll Yjfr■Irl M11•il !•i•r• N•1 I•il !•!•/t •!1 leii Iwwt r•rll wl.l eilt•wl i•24,to 7d'• 111• 4.Ot-v /f•i 1i11 I -•+*nl to.rlcw WU'r lit /� (� r A T t t 10•r1.?a IV. 16" 11.1./1AiNi•" [atria rlwr•[/Iloxl.w �� .!1 N 4 O Ll N T Y G (1 ■ i i� 0 R .t 7-11.11 11•, LD7 ►•f•1. .,•r i/W ,..,t l.cal•.In[.,��••wll0rl,t• Y J / � q 11.11 11.t• 1i11 III•i/•M Ae IIW 2WA Uws Wienl 1 IiF•I11iiD ll/[:nlA ~'ww•alll pt WAr I•l i•f t iM1 I1tl1 rltwa w•I.MI.+I.I.k Flfw,t I .1 1 71 7H4 1111 IL 'myI I bm CIO10•11.13 TV" I.I• ruw/A•u,MWWA ♦•T-1i le•tt loll M .i•rlrw/17wwt1 11•0 1- 14•1 t" lQn fdrrwlrlrM 11••!•wT 7-4.10 T411 t41i IAilllr lfWl Mr•/ '/1 Ir, r•[I•ir 11_ry :I1! LM `III/.i �,. ranrwl Ilawalrr 1. it � / // ///// /,/J/ � r�w.r. �L�4.�cl.�ii �G L.LJ�G1 • wl.w IWA !ut•I/1 RI•CZCc CcR J r E 7 8 6 ) ill-cz ,„•� F,.cz Rl-co-cz RI ti _ 1 RI RI RI ti r � fil•Cz �" / EluslwGAR lWFITlr}VIl •.) u,v.,0 i RI-CZ l�l it r QD IC ' e RA-0-CD RK `� (PREZGNED) 'I RA-0-Ca { R!-Cd �, rvti 1 ' (PREZ INED) � fC�S f ` ; ac s•0-CD ROS-0•CD oc •0-c : C2-0 (PREZ6NED) 0 CO NCO EiO GO • -CDIT i U'0-I,D RA-0-CO RA-0-CD -0•co RA-0 fr//L u-a•CD r �•�_••_ ti7f-G•b�D00 : RA-0I'�!!. .. :�!� RA-01 M-0-co 1 I•fttl•0•b�y�r!�M•11e,tt�' a e PA-0 RA-01 RA-0 RA•0-CP I ti I µ ��ryry I1- RA-01 RA-0-C-D '1 RA-CI-CD YAWICLO AVE. a trl/riY Y r . • PLANNING 7.0&!'NG QM 39 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAf 35- 5-1i -- NOTE:At% PIIIIIIOY/ALMS fr III I Yt 11r1 h Y � .YtoukJ MI.RCIr I Ir/� I7Ipa.w1 •Mt Ir po b/w.I II wt/wgI I. 111 �-1 !■``Jl ��1q1t�iYr t9UhCil g. �N.NCL ISO 1 I� 'wt Ct.fII p1 wc■ ■N.1IY1 wa .) 611LI LI W/ Mae 1 joll"( W rYmuou 1a 1IIKlrI: 7 1 tw.forma"'1, .In« uflu//■1 IN / 11 fl 1 • •11 IIrM N 7 I�11 1191 AAr 1.1111KI yy-1•Yl ih,Yll I Yrq rl 11 w y'1 11 I U Inw al L1,1) ONIAk. Aw4c"Itom W •tt I1�y rNl (��// II ■ '1 1 ■ r1M 1/r 11 M�MI HUN.rTNGTON I I:r NI ,1 11 1 FAL] IIMIRd\ swifg1�r^. q•1'N IIY 1•f-r• Ilh ar 1r,o uW11Rlu /;(1A'C1fts keg 1■■1■_{//1 •••yy■■■yrr•••T II•{{ /I 1{ u l l•r l rl l� .11 C � � �� MI II II 1 1 .n to"W 1I1 fM•Nlf. YIII It/ ' r'I Ct►ri;'� iw l�� to.r■Ytr //ai.w1 a117� 1. 1 1.1.11 16.4 M CO. copra►NrIMRah p111ri1 ORANGE COUNTY C.A L I I'0 R N I 1� .W"! �-c:c,�� ua t.—• �N�1 ��..�. IIHrIIf f 11,•Zl ►N I1•t•tr IAC9O1►/r/• �� ,I�wy1� t7 IIrMt■/Yk MIp.Cf i I ►t'I III 1•�f��or 1 1� ' 1; 111r1 rn.1/.w1, am M/frcnoraN.r■tllrlw///Illrcr 1•Irn r/11 11 a11•r 1/afrlwrll 1A111,117 1AIt\/N.0/Y)tM1iR7 ••-�1 1 1•d•/d I`� 11/ I tw■Vwt1 IACI r/I rw41 fN1!■R:I ' �•W•�I N • 1'h� ■�' �Ia� IN1.fItt rAYk•NM/■N/•A I11�r 1•I/li IHI Iip7 I.11-.1 II 11 f I�/�r�y�t17 M� Nw,.'r.rw■11Y Yf.11 tr�Yr DI, N 'SI'•�•// �•If rNa c .9INS r � q! or..au..trr.r��.r�•.�" rq•1 NCI Y-i'� �•� � a / /MuY.1IM r 11"I 1 a►msm II•a•I Il'N!A/ •- IMAlIt/IN 11 L_ TAIBt:fiT ` ��..— - •e•IS r1+I■,/ I•.� e1-■�a AVE. MI-CD MI-A IF-(*16)RLn 'a ''R SR" '- I L I All { I IM/1 11 R4 5R Rni III SH C�'-R A �.. Pti'Nlrrli7N "1-.Yt1A1. hl.,ltl M I �� tt M MI—A A -..-'•R4-SR RIM ': •• hot MI-CD �' RIOf ' II TZ IIIIV l M1L__._R' �A-0•CD �t• RI I'1 6R a C 2 • r I—CF-C �..... R I M I`c a "`•_-'•'.. bR R I R Ir- 5 VIM ."Ad MOWN rAGI R� ,/• ---... RI RI cF-c t w . '' RI RI �{! R1 �l R R3 I w_ MI-CD "— +roc M 1 0l, •A.NNL14 on J cn Si, ' AZ Rs N --J raw R MI per - g.�' _..__ .__ �. •/ MI-0-CD MI-01 R2 177WW.wr tc� ,�' C 2 c� `1 R 2� RA-0-CD �.. ....�I / OP ISO �,• m ti7 R 3 1 �- OP A�Q M1_0 �i3 R2.� .,tL / for— IRAC �'d C 1' ta�rRltr OP T:' Ihl[f C 4 I WA• W-� „ W1CIP(01 T ONE) R 3 M 1-0 -ol MI01 uP t� 1j ° • OP R� ' m • R3 w RZ R2 r I GAR,'PN" Aye 1 ' If��Nu■N� - tYru�.Il■Ig/ k• 'fir e� • w Huntingtun Beach Energy Series Deport + 1 Preserving Surface Access to Underground Oil Reserves in Developed Areas D� . D city of Huantftton Seach C"artmnt of Deva4A I WMSwvices pig► � '' FeWuary, 1981 �r N Y I( II E OF RUMUCTOR BEACH CITY WUMOL adbyl,IM"fr ear, Msyr Ph)-Tom n ,,��• �c�irwrua (fit.. ��• i 1 ' i RCRt fl PfiF.S RVIND SUff ACE ACCESS TO UNDERGROUND D OL RESERVES SU Dc:1F:LDPM AREAS � I CITY OF'HUNTWATON BEACH T +IT OP DEVELOPMMI sVXES RIP. Al r+, low �, S� I v "ten. Y 1 1 1 . T' Of Cats rA.QE FORWARD 1 DEFINITIONS 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION 4 2.0 COASTAL ZONE PAANAGEME NT AND ACCESS TO OIL RESEfRVES 7 3.0 UNITIZATICl 9 WATER L w A HE ACCESS PROBLEM 9 3.1 Primary, Secondary rmd Enhanced OU R:.covery Techiridlogy 10 3.Z Difficulties in Achieving Unit Operations 11 3.3 Vokintery Unitization: Difficulties In Assigning Casts and Rene tits 12 3.4 Compulsory Unkizaticn M. 3.5 Advantage of Uniti.ation 15 i, 4.0 ptOLES FOR CITY GOVERNML-NTS IN PROTECTING ACCESS 17 TO UNDERGROUND OIL POOLS 5.0 TOWNLOT/'DOWNTO`IN ANALYSIS 19 5.1 Brief History 19 5.2 Remaining, Roxcoverabie Oil 22 • 5.3 The Pona.bility of a Unitization, and Enhanced Recovery Project 27 5A Surface Area Requ irementu 30 • 6.0 POLICY OPTIONS FOR THE CITY 36 6.1• Existing Lend Use Regulations 37 6.2 Strategies to Helps Preserve Existing trill Sites 37 6.3 Strategies to Help Preserve Other 09 Opermtian Sites 39 6YA Permitting New !Neils in the Townlot A�a 39 6.3 New .Oil Sites 40 j 6.6 Ot:'-ier Possible Actions 42 7.0 CONCLUSION 43 8.0 MOTES 44 APPMOICES 45 • Appendix its Chastionneirr Cover Letter 45. Appendix B: Bibliography 68 i • r n or 1• Fomword Thin is the fil-st irs a series of distmasitx, pape!r*& on cr►t;r�y•rti:let�,;i ,Wst,as preparuW by the planrtc9 Oivislsn of the f;lty of fi ntingt%j !�-Psch. FkirAin-Itun Bears; is �, c•rni"; fnr many txterr�y�a lstecl �:tlYlti Including rwss'x�re: t�tit O ff;.,tyre ail production, an electricity-genesrsking powe*' filant, and !ncros-q!ng1-Y, sssoitu- arxi c:an,servation Lec:hnolOgiv.s. The psrrp a of tile" report.& is to help the Oi+.y vo accommudsito +_i':� :rntlrwrd productial � c�i< a~ �►ital '"ertiu*sx ses aneryy v�hils� st the sale thm miLignting so mu&1 as passlbla nny adverts knpsac+,s an tl°ye cars�m pity that ,arch 60-1vititO aright incur. Oth��; rsMps'yct„� in i.l��s � SI se.t•lssss 17.c.lurle the following: #k Fiscal lmpsects of Coil Operotisana FkjnL IvogUW- Beach f; oil !pill Contingency Pivining In !- ntlnnt,cm 1cach E 14 EW)asved sail itecovcry T�+chnalvgy p Soar *nd (I.amwvation Paliels'es at the Local t.nvesi r, This puhlicsUm. was {tretp►artd With ilnssr+cisl UNIstence fro►,} tho U-S' Off'" of C.t�tri�tsl e+�ttib'y�t+ l+s tr Mieti;mn.' Oco4nic arw! Atmospheric Adinlinisstrationt oMlrt �'tic ;re►�rriri of firs. Fedwel iC�.cstal' r: sa+lrr+agemarr: Act of 177Z, as arnetxiadt ant from z CM11fa W Cartrtsl tnIrian 6srrdet' the prov4�i. am of the CoMmA Act Lit , tr97b. r• • 1 f k i dio ns )ttis rt 1.) j,:Oi o p ec- f t tic., f i I i rKJ:_1 st r Y. e vI i he, '1,oinili(ir to LN� 'rho of sor-,a tif the;e t ertill, i I 1,t° I hi. �6"1:1it.,4-i ort, 4 ht.-i:-,eJ tbe. first tits .". hc.), wipp C anso li do i i, I.,h fal"d i f PS %J)o -O!k1fively vnell, W6r;4W" , rr�!`ti�r!►.yi"�: � ;'f _t4�t11�': ti,' �'t' {:�'i"! "f: 1 ( jcea,�t,r Prnfits rc,;-,dUrV rrom a Mhcq,ced In I t-S x lv ic ist Amy method which 1i used to recover i a pe ru,eurn rescrw)ir than wcxi;d be obinined by r-f-trao-y -:ietht-xfs; 3o m o?t i rn ips u,*-0 to rnean tt;,-t(ary Irecovcry r4ily. in 1-jrLy jvfivt frorn tiir i:.,. -?Pt-i or another Darty, Um-mi-h whic)i 1-,remurizcd wc-'Pr, Steam cc ofiwr fluids are &Iveii or.:I L WVJic7Tte—&1 into an oil reserl,.ir. .10int _5nq(!!:.1z6Unn: A N, )operativii jr7-cxip frxine'd by ssoveral vU, uperators toorkiiV a common rP.3W—N*FF7',x- Ow lx-Tpo-sc the [CUMN11ty of formiry 0 unit. Lcrt��VL.�xi formulky An a,jreemerit amony oil q;-,wutors v,;io ha, e formed a unit regarding ti,.n proportiai cf expense nrwJ profits c-,' Vo unit each operator will be allocated. Prirq�?-X irrxIuction.- OU &iven up though vrlls h-,P natural PqV.%su-e in the f(s-niatlon ar by I _ k- I punipitV w w(thout injecting water or other, fluids tq I*lp force the oil to the producer, : We.Ila and to purnp out oil f rorn a re3emvIr. AvSyc!L n&. In 00 con(ext,- ;.e zrs to 9w, redeivlopment of the xxface area of an oil field for it.ws such as ImIng or orminpree. ,Secondary y troductl.)n: 00 extracted artcr primary pmduction uswily by injectfiiq gas or Qvier Pri o the reservoir. TeOvilcal committee: A committee established by a joint argunizatian of oil operators P=Far 1.6-M 76F Wto—n 'of a unit uphich 19 -a3ponjible f or investigalfng variables 3mnh as the geology of the 0, r*scrvo(rt characteris).(cs of the oll and Ow nest potential recovery Leciniques. I rert3ary mettiods: 00 recovery methods applied utter "condary pro&ctfon which Usually fnvulve the rnri:Ftifon of chemicats with waiv- fnto the rvurvoir W help push out more oil than water alone can. In some case,% Umse methods are applied after primary pmdictlan. V f , UP*: M ,rutty farmed by soverai Mf f erent oQ companies which work a oummon oil pool 'o—dar o ahav xq 4ment rail rninafv) Interests to protMce the reservoir as a single party, When MA interesU In ea p►oal are fmigment,ad, coats are a mential "or the uzo or most wrshrc od ad recaw ry rnrthrx4 which Can mily be applk.,d an c roordinated, pool-wide Data. Ur ititat" n1: The pracco of f'cra-Airq a wilt, I ..,V�I,1P...Y..-- iVa errflood: A mcaulary rocov,.,►-y rrCgr,oin elrotiyh which prtssurtzed water is injected do ► c ritarvotr to ender to pr.,M more oil from the pores in tke rack, Water tar ectfon: .rather tar'r;i r,,r "w :tsrflo*':° Well-b : The hole drMed f rom Vu sairf ace into Vw uanGerp►rc+urui oil pn►ai for rlw. pia -pope a f &4y materials two the pool and► or extractlnp m,,i !`r(n(3 out of tt. fvws 7hhe urdergmM rock st%?a whicli eor:!a!n oil, f �M w� i i I I 1.0 od The City of i- ntington Beach overlies an production fates. Thus, many parts of tt•,e old and very µroe,. tive oil field which, field are reRgvttne to new uses, •speaclarily to since Its discovery In 1920, has produced htxjairg. almost a billion barrels of all. Although the field passed Its productive peak dec, Ars to mast case, however, Los recoverable ail ago,. It stlU produced enough all during 1979 in the underground reservuir has not been to rw* seventh among all t:allfomis oil exhausted whan the s<irfeve: eras is fields in annuel outiput. Over 1.9000 wells developed. . For example, primary afp* still active in ttrr field and pmcluctton, simply pumping ss much oil an approOnately 472 acres of the City am arAsible without injecting water or other uNW far oil operation& wbstanc$3 too- help force it hut, typically extracts only 15 to 20 percent of the oil in Far sovotrel years, however, the amount of plsr.e. ConsegLiently, when an ail livid in IwW cft voted to cell extraction in Huntington which only primary production techniques -Feeds tins declined. The rea wn for this are have been utilized recycles to new urns, the cionr. In thoso parts of t1w oil fiend whom great majority of the all usually rermins in woUr I+t/aetlat or rather anhartcrd recovery the ground. Opelmlegles limy- not been sppliod, wMik'r`tlW to/ale have draappodl txbstrg and )II-known Seeond" idslnifle:;rfitly. At the saarna tienn, tho Y&IL + production taectud s, such as water of llrb surfece ate* for r:ew uses — Injection, car. recover on additional 10 to 30 nowlally for housing bare In toostal, percent cf the oil. In addition, several new aft"an Swthem California -- has risen techrmlogles, Svrdc y methW4i are being OW"tleaDy. Building on the tail find developed and Used to extract the all 1 1� 1w beewne mcn prbfitsble than rernrlrrtrg after secondary production. ahead all extraction at vwy low AW d i v r.J r , � 1 . r 1ifYM.r.•.w�.bw•+w.wrY�r+1A11.Wr,.rw.rw+ar�..+.....w.w, tertiary methods as well. Fl:)ura 1,t When then interests in wi coil pool are: highly f;agrTwrlted, hc)wm er, :he numerous parties must net aM a emit before thcise ,advanced Secandes;y`��. ` technolocaica can be uppiled. The operators encoueitCr several difficulties In forming a coordinsta:, ' ►`unit ►' end often cannot act T to athar tr: apply r�t er tire, y` � 17P y these more efflcle � r- t . � � �. IR prodt on T1e hods. ip� ri mb ry '�� ' ��►• � �' ,• . .ti�\�`�,� �•,, '�� heae difficulties are rlisc��5�t.0 later in tliLo report. However, if these proNoms are UVVrUD1i1d1 W°lltJXa1,i(JV1 C,311 th C1ohit vod and Roma in 'no oil II �� enhanced recavr:ry inabie:ds ol�ph-_d to Recovery by Future provide largo 31TIOIIntS of oil. 1`er:hrialagy7 uhl eney not Ue rocovered (even of unitization be -nmez e-conornically feasible) 1 if there are no surface areae from which extraction c:an be accomplished. It is precisely those Fereas where secondary methads sure not currently u4ed that f'ercantagr at fail in the Ground production has declined somuchthat: Which is Usually Recovered key abandonment of the field for rede:volopme;nl. Different Extraction Methods, is more profitable then continued oil extraction. Thus, the parts of the field • Source; Petroleum Enc�ins r, which are most likely to be developed for January, b� residential or curnmel cial uses and to Inst, fubire access from Lh* surface are also the � �' ^ _�-- ------��-��-�--�-- ones where secondary methods have not been tried end where their application could potentially produce large Amount.$ of oil in Several of these niethWs are being tried in the future. parts of the 1•• ntington Beach fin Id. Domestic oil supplies era an increasin ,ly Secondary and most tertiary techniques scarce and valuable: resource. Their value carmot be applied on an individual wall cierlves not only from their economcc worth bosia, Fluids, s►ich as water or water imit feam other, leas-tangible, benefits treated with chr.inirals, arts forcpa through ;elated to the decressed reliance on foreign several wcl!s Onjectors), swroping the. oil sources. these benefits reach beyond residual oil our of the pore spuces. nrwl then the local community and have a regional and to neveraal other wells (procUcars) which even a national importance. The pump the oil to the, surface. Tivi injecLars greeter-:han-local Importance of domestic arO producer* arts ,. typically rurr•angmi in uU would argue that the prea ervation of patterns so that the injected fluids can significant oil production opportunities efficiently sweep through an oil pool. i hus, should be the Concert`, of the State or the entire all pools must be treated as a whole federal government, and not primerUy of at a unit aril these methods must be applied the clt.v. In a coordletateed way. t_cecsi governments, however, traditionally When the eirntim p,-,)l is owned by a single have control over lured use. It is the City tv"a ny, use of then methods it roiatively which melee control surface activities if land essay. In fatty the major oprerotors in for future oil oxtraetion need* to be Hmtk*ton Bracts — Aminoll, USA and pratected. The local governireeent also Chvviw„ USA -- have been wtorf toodV #arts that rresponrlbUlty of pmteeting the 001ie pasta of ttrs field for over two Intoresta of the preni;t and future It a s&err and cloth ecaWanies are taentirwj eomm mity a nTmndkV ail opet•at,lons. S R r • Cons.quo ntiy, esnuther reason fo,: t=:ity cant;mjetian of a very valuable revenue InVOf SMVIt in this issLIr it 11-1 f!tlai,re that wurce in the comrTlunity. The purpose of any adverse unpac:ts on nearby users from this report la to discuss the protection of Nture oil o►zerstiord +sre, reduced to access to oll resources as an important reasonable levels. One othwr ccrisideretitxi rc iSidet-atioro far 10CH1 land 1W, p0lic1'-w. it that the City nwst weigh in assessing the di3cuwee the nc;nierous variables on which access irue Is that oil produ;:tion generates .;censo preservation can be based, auageats a substantial tex revenues to tlx local i-ange of protection strotegiexs, and analyzes government. Protecting sr.-cgxs and the specific areas in Huntington Bench where OpCon to apply fut.urp extractiuci they caul,i he applied. technologies may bn crucial fcr the r wn,6w . Coastal Zone Management and Amass to 01 Reserves The Cellfornia Coestal Act of 1976 calls for Among the considerations relevant to the thw oroterti-vn of the natural resourCes of long-term utilization of these coastal Califomeials coastal zone. Amen l the goats erziourt:es is the need to protect surface of the Act Is tar access to the oil rew.rves. The a;ea of the City where the most significant &.posits "Anam urcierly, balanced utilization and still in prim6ry production are round, and coraaselrvation of coastal one mocurces where future access is most jeopardized, is taking Into account the soc lai a it j economic the Town lot/Downtown area, which it neadi of the prople cif the state."l partially in the coastal tyre. (See Figure 2.1). The City recognized this issw in the Co tainly the most significant natural Land Lin Flan of its LC`p, which Includes reeaurms in and now the Huntingttm Beach policies to amend the muenicipa! code, it coastal zone include the long-productive necessary, to help Ensure that such surfacr. dapoSita of oil. In accordance with the acsress is reservedo if it is essential to the intent of trio Coastal Act, the City Is future daveloprnent of significant oil e0004911 d with tha orda:rly utilizaticrr of resources. Thane report is IrAended to heolp them Ooposlts. The City's Local Coastal they City analyze these issues, as a atop Plist) CLCP) policies era Intended to toward mfining its policies and ordinances a tart to the le gitimate needs of the aimed at ensuring the efficient, long-term oil ler*ue r whUe *lade protecting other use of these Important coastal resources. &Mp ir'tw t e mstel raswre ss such as the eselleeeeational aril risuel aquoitie s of the aMeetdatalin& 4 r f1 11rT�'N•'�• Y - w Coastal Zone Boundary HI [B-1 ILrL11m, I N ILI 10M LE i IT _ [0 [E M- Ml, ttIl , I U I E i €. AD f L� LL �• L tr. 1, w [E TIL-A-i �Tj rffl1 Ij Flil. LLIL W [DF] r TT' 71 iT I ( j;;. nf, , ml E9 E9 E9 �9�d H H �1- H li�j py py PA q"- Pq, N L -� low - -- s Aft Figure 2.1 Tovwn]ot/Oowntown, Ksntington Beach. Source: F•4jntlrvjton Best Rlanninq Division. tkVcq: beach rig di- is -� Recovery r W ft Access Problem ProvldkV future arcass to underdi-yr loped apply seir-ondar y ur tertiary production 00 reswves Is usually a Poncern only where technologies. Consequently, a discussior nf rrtww operators wm. k a common ieservolr how unitization i3 related to these metli w and they have not been ablv to tinitize nrid arid why unitization :-• water Oil ProducingInjection Pump injectionbwell well .-- —� *M�'• �►�'(-- ICE►� •�!'��r��•�' cr ��`'�• ti ♦ �� 4� I�r wt�ll�**+fir`*'�1�� *11 �� :� � + ,�� ' � "�1 �� /, � � • ;��ti1�►rr..��lflf.♦_ �r.r •�. •-•11�.•A+—+I•sl.�. r�� il,r _;*1�...,�� ••. '� ; fw ' tr.fir; � ,, f Injected Water �l �' tc ecf leve is very Important to 4;1 a(1nlyaii Murh awe of thr oil can often be recovered of the access Issue. If prettaurized water I* Injected into the: oU P uu!. Tt- wester he lee W move the a i l 3.1 PrimstrIL Sec ond;iry aixi� thr Ugh the pnre: in the ruck, In this Tl ecuve�r—T__iechrxrla� technique, the preaeurizad wet.or is forced into the rrservnir through "injector" wells. The simplest aril rnrasl r arrim;6 methW of 'fho� water moves out in e;l directions frain extracting oil is V., drill n wr1l ir)tc the thi!se wells, sweeping oil in front of it. (See oil-laden rock %usurally sands►arvc in thi-i K*, ure :3.1.) area) and p.mp as rrruch of the nil AS possible. Flawaver, all Is a sticky, thick saner wrIIs, called "producing," are substance lwhich does riot flow very easily arrang.-d around the injectors to pump out through the pores beitwevri the gralm of the oil +arxI water. (See Fhy. ire 1.2.) sand in the rack. Often, rno;v Hum 30 percent of the original all ing placa remains To efficiently use the pree, -d water, In the reservoir after Lhis "prirnory" producing and inje- ter walls ts► .• .,rranged in technique is aceaornpli$hnr' patterns wbich allow most of the aU oushed by the water to be pumped out. (See Figure �IOfAY.•.I,R�,.A.I.••s�1•YYWW.qp,�..V,1�MY1Y.Y�1 FIVire 3.2 " ti •��r;;: Figure 3.3 ; , ; �'!,• :i.,fig 1',i;/ ( I i ? 1i +,' ..5`rr' ,;?,�...y 'i'. .yM'�'t`•• s •.y, X x X X X I '. fit•'••4' , (:1'{�•�P;'�, r. :',t•fir. �'7 �fY � ,�' .:• w.., 'R�ti{• i{Ik;1;y�jJ•i�•Dsyn ..r��• �.=1`.'vrNS•'�•.v:/ X X X x x +u 0 0 0 0 water' X x injection well o production well a� b�. •<<�,t"�4� ;•i•'psi: Example of Well Pattern in .r•.., *,, *}' r ": Waterflood program I " .... `'• Source: Oil Wall DrIllInq Tech V c ray an Pressurized w4tar from the C e, . iniecti on wel 1 0 forces of I toward the producing wells 0 Top View of IMatetflood. These patterns are not always reflected In the mTiace locations of the wells because 5our+ce: r- ntingtorr Beach Plarrnirrg weds can be drUled "directionally;" that is, Division. at an angles and It Is the location of the bottarrrs of the weUs in the nil pool Itself whim Is so important to the application of these techniques. An advantage of directional drilling In that a few, conLrallxed surfers parcels can sometimes TIM-0#—w-t-fisj o cancentratirq facilities accommodato many directionally-drilled Intel Mllr Intensively-UN4 surface Mrfes' M wells through which much largar reitet+r �MttM1. urxWrgrcWW Wean con be toppw4.a a 1 'Clearly, this this r►rtethod which is cr,lled "water pVti(lrani. In fr,ct, &i laiport.anll reason why injection" ur "water fluod,` cannot be applir.d unitixa'_ron is not tried in many cases is that through a single well, k' ;ather, mw1y w,Allz. there is rx) iar•ge rays piny with enough of an arse involvicd which rr met lie work:!d in a interest. in the reiervoir to warrarrt the coordinated way; the :rec:ratiar� wid (ktpth of costs rentl risks of trying to form a unit. the wells, the tirliini of the.. inJ+a. ;.in,_, rind irna!I nil Cnr piviies ,sua lly du not have the prciduclog phasr":c, the ptesars,e applied at technical or tinamial resources ti) Instigat different timers and locatlont, and many r: rr►it.. other variables ►rrrrxz he plarined Logether to gent the best use of the technique. rfie However, even when a large corporation leas entire pool mug be treated as a •vhole, or itF an interest in the pool, it must Overcome a "unit" — otherwise a significant part of seyeml barriers bcfore unit:izotion can be the Investment in 0111ing this wall' and achiove:rr 1n)ecting wsAttn under pressure rney be lost because much of the ail may he pushed First of ell, there is a significarr, incentive obout l)LA not collented. for any Individual operator not to r:•rtic=pate in a unit while hoping that. his When a single company works 9,c-1 entire oil rticre rxrmerous neighbors instigate the pool, thi.' type of producticm method is project anyway. In this situation, the other bu illy accomplished. When seyeral operators in the field incur the cost of operators are pumping from the *&nrne pool, developinq the secondary recovery program, they must agree to work togeti—V as a unit. while at the same tirne, if his wells are This, however, Is often very difficult. Thesa favorably located, the hold-cut la able to difficulties will be discussed more fully in incover oorne of the ol! swept by the unit's the next section. injection pattern. Th` hold-out does not Tare In the costs e f implementing the Even after secondary recovery, more than program, but he shHre-s In the increar-:d 50 perc Ent of the all remains in the ground. production. Often, so many operators New methods are being dery loped ro refuse to join a unit for this reason, that the recover sorrre of this oil. Many of these program c3pnaL be undertaken. ThLs invol•n 'injecting substenc:es InIn the oil predicament 13 raften referrer, to as the acres along with water; these substances free-rider prYbical. help pttah out more oil then water car. alone. Again, however, these techniques are Federal price Controls on oil have often most effir.ie:ntly applied on a poor-wide been cited as Inhibiting unitization. The basis."' These technologies rise often federal government has recently taken steps called "tertiary production" when they to deregulate the price of all domestic: j follow an earlier water injectiion program. production, so price Controls are} no longer Howevor, in a reservoir where water ran Important consideratiotr in analyzing a lnjfttlon has net occured, these. c-ch piques urill's pi►tential profits. might be applied simulteneously with or Inmtead of a simple waterflood, to incraRm Some parties may not be Interested in the effliclency of pro duc!inn. joining a unit because tnes oil operations are, in fact, awned by firms whose principal 3.2 O fficulties I Achieving" 'Unit interest is in redeveloping the very valuable surface land at n time when it is most profitable. Such firms do not want to A large oil cc:ripany which hnlds a commit the it- surface holdings to a substantial fraction of an oil pool will he the longterm unit agmement for oil party most likely to Iry n unitiri-Ainn production. This problem could be overcorft if these operators are 'willing to join on the basis of mineral rights, but not T we►v nc it ll such technologies Are so surface area or equip.tTont --- provided appliod. Se® Report 4 in th;s series, enough surface land still rernains to produce "Efftnced fail Recovery," for rr Culler the field economically. discussion of these methods. 11 Another pe.►trntial prrtik-in Involves the! thbt t oulcl be recosivred and the auitability iiahility of a unit fur productlu i deelirw c►f thv m.!ierviceir to seersndary arr009 aic ill,arlf ;, If enc:,inIi pr1rdL1ctior;--anci lrc"rtcf! LIU p0lVrt.4)I hrOfit.s operators are willing t!a p Licipate thrt a Uiat could be r.,olize.d frnm H unitizecim W61L wr:' erfIocrcl is undertaken, ttW: pmgrnm--,:earls surne of the parries t-K,!ding operritirms could result in a nun-partccip;-.ntls an Inte.-e it In the rewrvoir to puy1wer a pr•oductitoi declining (slthou(ti ofteii it voluntary unit agree me:nc. increases as explP inert abnve),* TN! unit may them 0r- liable for the loss In !manually, a mnior oporwtor !•►oIJing a production. CULIrt rases in Tehas And subctantlal Erection of the interest ir: the Ksnsr,a have absolved units of such liabllity; repor•voir i.,ontact.s other ownership Interests however, soma companies have cited the and invites them to a roveting to explain, risk that the unit might he held liable ns a why a unit operation aid a field-wide reason for not participating. recover), pn•.)ject may be desirable. Often, rrrany opn atoru are r•.ut interested because Thus, for all Lh?� se reasons, it is diffici t to they have no first-hand unitization get all the parties that hold an Interest in or, experience, or they do rot have the oil pool to join a unit vuI tint ariiy. L) light of technical background to assess the poLe:ntial this, arrd the fact that urritizathxr and value" of the project. Many operators are � enhanced recovery is the most efficient simply suspic.lous of the tare intentions of a , method of extracting a very valuable inajor camprjny, doubting that small firma res'cxarce;, most states have established will get fair treatment in the joint compulsory unitization laws. These requires ar•rangen*nt. Other reasons why individual 1 hoid•outs to Joan a unit If a certain operators might not express evF-n a percentage: of the total interest in a field Is tentative Interest in the project were willing to participate. This percentage discumed above. varies from 60 percent to 85 percent. (See 'rabir 3.1.) In some rnsesi. however, several of the pe,rties are tentatively interested in +a The cornixrl:sory l.Aiitizntlon laws in common operation and they begin to work California, however, are lirnitud in their on a unitization agreement, This Ls usuaily epplicaticin arKI may not be rrievent to a very to-ig, difficult and costly process. Huntington HeaCh. Voluntary and The first step is 'the initiation of a joint rompulsory unitization wv. the: topics of tiv" crrimilatton, next sections. The joint organization usually est ablistic s 3.3 Vuluntairy Witization: DifficAilties in seave.ral committees to rxaearch Information 7�sa+•ngCosts and Eie ee_MM necessary for developing the unit. The most Important of these is probably the tachnicol Despite the risks and costs of trying to pert cominittce w1nose task is to determine the tagether a unit, sometimes the amount of oil geology of tan reservolr and to recommend the beat recovery technique to be applied. This committee analyzes such factors as the: + his cool occ-�r if the hold-out's well were areal extant of the oU zones, their depth so close to the ur.Ws Ji.njeictors that the oil in and thickness, faulting patterns, existing the zone: near Ws well is swept away by the well-bore distribution,tion, and surface arose pressuriti;d water. Tloe result would be a evailablez fnr new wells and equipment. The lorrp increase in Ow acpeount of seater committee then evaluates possible recovery Trumped froin his well, but not in the amount methcids. Historically, r voist units were put of ail. togethfar to apply simple water 12 TAN a , ,�." !h�.i, tt.�r��f::iid;��lti, �. . .r...1�y.w+.a . Nw1 �i . �..M ..MMPPPww1.F.�h�.W.ell•�YLMtiMT, MM�rM1�'!wprrr ftreent of Working Ferrent of Working Percent of Workin,7 Int*_ost Required Inta_ast Required Interest Requi.rcd State For Cc�sisory Unit State For Cc=Tulsor3 Unit State Tor car--Fulsory Uznt A►lalaaara 75 Louisiana 73 Ohio �5 Alaska 62.5 ffair_` 65 Qklsh ma 63 # A:l toesa o3 Michigan is Qreq~,r ?5 E Arkansas 75 ttiaeOUL•1 75 � S'euth Da_::�za 75 California 75 Montana �€} ; Tennessee 5L� Coloraaa to 75 Utah 80 Florida 62.3 Vir4: nia ?S + i I12inzis 75 New Mexico 75 loin, �C � Q Kansas ?S Now York 60 � Kentucky 75 Barth Dakota 8) � r Tahle 3.31- Percent of Working interest Required for Compulsory Unitizstio:� 3tatutea. 5oitre: FOR Potential in U.S., OTA, I976 htiton beach planking division injectico%. riawe;ve:r, futUre units may Live 5urfiice areas nrr: llkewlsc unequally volved enhanced racoveery technoingy wilt! tNe — wrilw arc rr►c a critical Lean waterflo,>J to recover more :atl t'ljuirker, of;hors. Differs=nl aparetora will also wstheslr man waltinq to r,iaply such e,untrltwte more wrUs, nsare mineral r lghtt, technolNies after a sir►►ple Ir,jr:::ti, in+re stor.,i(je nr pioceasinq equipiment, or project. 'rhea c ullec:tiu n cf data and ttm (tyare surface area than othem PlAck fos evaluation rnvy tssske year's, deperxJinq on the property ownership or In con►.r:al over tomplfixit.y of t'1e ecology and whether Lhs►e iniividAsal operations is another less tsangibie field Is well-known or not. The cornrnittsee'sy factor affecting the► value an Individual may reacorsnrT1;?nd8r.lnrv3 musyt he brniight hefi)r� rolArr on h6 Intes:r:.asstes in tha reservoir. the full joint organix ation for approval. uluarl;, is"Ign)r. coins and bete fits In a A legal ecrornmIttfti m3earchess lar-ri and way that is considered fair by all parties is o Imterest titles and royalty agrearnents an�,j rare; kiifflhr-s)r, pane gs involving long-term tries tL determine If there aiv any legal negotlatIonss. ` 'wally, the greater the resstrictioevs or pmbl---rna related to property number of partis.:., the more difficult it in to righsra which could jeepareizo tt a snit mach an acceptable ngrrernent project. This committee is also responsible for viurking with the DIvI3- Ion of Coil arid Once a participation formula Is arrived at, Gast, the State rseeslAsstury atigesicy, to orpare ranit aagreaesnenU we drawn up tar the that the proposed unit sat isfies any opserssatorr and the royalty owners. staLLADry and administrative rras;uireementa related to multi-ecampan/ nail :,persatinns. The time frarn InItiat Ion, through negotiNtions, to sagrearnent can take up to A land cammittes a Identifies all the-, parties tour or more year's. The lsangth of time and holding surfaeic#,t and mineral rights sarxi concurrent expense of thew negotiations, as informs thorn of the passible un;t agreement. well as the risk that !.he negotiatie; is may reach an impasses sand the project may be An accounting committee records the precluded, conkribute to the reluctance of expenses of the joint aarganizsatim during maiy operators to try to initiate or this pleeminq process. This committee will participate In such a program. work with the technical committee In determInIN the moot pro+fitable tachnique 3.4 Compulsory Unitizetiexi to be applied (conasiderienq tax and depss eieation requleations, etc.). Many stater,, recognizing that unitization f Increases tNe. efficiency of rroductieon an Pmbasbly the most difficult pearl. of the well as the total a rmunt of nil ultimately volurawy unit agreement is to determine recovered, have anerected rernpula>nry the pwtfciMUon rcrmulo --- the share of the unit17aation satetutsess. These laws require roll coats each participant must pay and the interest-hold Ing parties in an oll purl to join sanvuet gach will Deter receive frcrn the In sa unit, If sa certain majority percentage of unM profits. The input of the technical the pwtiesd !agree to unitize, committee is very Important in this determination. The value to the ,unit of California actually hits two, crampulssory certain mineral rights, for example, will tin itIz at!on laws. 'they fMat requires depend an how much of the oil, reservoir is unitization In order to wraterflood and theses Irre;ludeed and whe is it is located in the, to repres_uriaed in oll field J subsidence is oil-laden formation. The some is true for injuring or Imperiling buildings, herbom and the volusthr. of exiatisng wells -- the other Impmvemerntss or may be interfeerring luestioN depth, age and condition of a well with commerce, navigation or fishery, or will affect how slrnportant It Is to aI unit. where subsidence-induced inundation !could 14 r ...a r tislertgar life, heat;.h, safety, public peace, Thrre nre numeru<<si re!sted advamrajrs that welfam r.r praprrq. result from this. This law Is inapplicable; t.') Huntington Beach iFlrlt, ley i0l rrioasi e,4, 1%.1hi:; is a n`"lry at this time becausie there: are presently no cff:cient pmductlan tarhnicue: the total serious threats fruity subside ,cat in *.he City. volume of c,il recovered i► -reaarn; the LVoe it L,Akes W M-WILtLt. that oil ir. r3duotm; the. 'the secorxJ stritutt� is tonmetimes rcfrrri:c' to &rnviunl. of capital invested (equipment, as the Tow nsit.e Ltgwr. If 75 perc+rni, (i f r he we 11-bmr.5) per voluir., ; of oil is reduced. working InLarest of w-i rail pool ag:•ee u, g urtlY operation, thks law ram►&b!es the Stptc t^ Sec once, cot 0)f stir `'�c:� arata require the remaining Irotert-sts tc join tits: 119+.1811y _)ccornpaniet 111'citlrvticr��. state uiit ho well. The c's)wnsite law, hnwever, 0 Wilt agreement can only he ai)[iroved appiles only to fi,,,Ws wtilM vvnrr rlisc-nvnrr.d if =, r:rt) ;icit�� c before 1934 and which am at l Nr+at 75 percent within an Inc.-;rpnrated cit.y. It is "To the full extent practi al, for the not clear that this law t+ould be applied in urganization and consalidatioti of surface Huntington Beach becaugee lance parts of facilities, irtrludi,ig oil productic.4i, storatle, this field extend offisoore and Into the Boise Lrestment and transportation utilities, in C:hlns whlHlr Is to-lrtcorpvratrri c:ot)nty land. such a manner as will eliminate wastehii and excessive uze of land surface &rest, The retio,-wle b4iirxi the law as "that the freeing such areas for other productive user management., development and operuticri a-f end development lands as a unit for the prodoctitxi of oil ar;;i gas aidst in preventing wai. te. increases th!!t Fur examiple:, the rnany rentedl tank ssysterns ultimate recovery of oi! and gas, and associated witti ,small groups of wells can be facilitates Increastxl cuncurrent t:se of clirninated and a larger, centralized surface lands fur• other beneficial separation ono trcatrnnnt p!ant. Utilized. purpmes.1112 New wells and rx•drills can often be • consolidated into walleo and landscaped Lkdar the law, reon-joiners may sell their islands. Existing wells which are riot Interest In the pool at a fair-market value. Important to the iniPrtion patulrn may be This Yj I-.:e is determined by �n a-isrspment P!LJ9C)ed Pod abandoned. of the "primary tract value" based on the projwted features primary production if no A workshop on urban oil development held in secondary were undertaken, plus the the Southern Cal:fornle urea recognized "secorWary tract value" based an etstirnates these kinds of advantages to unitiz,tlon, of,spcondary rec:every. The members of the cnrtic ILA ing: unit moat pum.ho se these lnterest3 if they are offered for sale. if the buyer and m Iler ". . uriltize-ticm was a beneficial tool to be disagree an a fair selling price, an used In aldar fields for improving oil arbitration procedure has been established recovery, aostheti,:al�y improvirig oil field to determiner a fair valuatl c. operations and eliminating deserted, idle or e unneeded kvalls.'A :5.9 Advantages of iv.Jr+ltizsti+xt �ntag r..■ . The bt:rtfrfits of unitization extend to the It is elear that unitizattort is Important for fiscal stetus of the City as weal. In snotltc: the application of waterfluoding arvJ other study, the i kintington Beach planning arihone,ed recovery techniques, Oivislun ha, analyzed the fiscal lmppct of oil operatiorn to the City. The firs;irrigs Indiratu that ecsnaalidated facilities# employing waterflood and other enhanced i y � recovery thChno INies are signI f► .:ajni. plant may rr;quire tt lbying of new rret-revenut: g-nersat.n:10 For eaxamplr., pipelines in public right-of-way, caur.ing Amirtail and Chevron, with highly tempor9ry disruption of the street system. c-wuglidated opetatiQrtia, 014r at�otrt 60 increased wotei-flooding snay increase porcent of the wells ire the City to produrr demand on public sewerage and water oh out. 85 percent of the eil and 85 percent dlspooal systerns. Nonetheless, from a fiscal 0 the oil-related revenues, The reasons for perspective, the revenues generated by this ate that caste terxl to att the unitization usuaally greatly outweigh the few facilktias are, r•on.xlidated mind 1+. ::e acreage costly effects. 4 usad arsd ;...at: revetnue,a Increase ns production irr.rerrsei. The operations also tend to Imprnvn becuute the oil pool is now worked , to large. The west of police: patrnling, for ext+mple, is company or unit with a wir' financial ba,%e moue sensitive. to the number of all sit.ees than many of the irxiNW— operators. This I, ths►n to the mirrtbei, of nil wells. Thus, irr a tends to make financir- of mitigations for t unitixatloti and ronsolidAtion project If the edversts aesthetic and gnvironmentel number of w ha stay the sa.-ne or ev-n impacts associated with oil production increao:, but ten sites eiv used, police cnsts ea►etar, The unit can typically provide attrib-tiablP, to tail ;:an decline. For another better fencing and landscaping, ex*rnple, iN_ costs of the City.- tor io:md-pros ling and odor emission controls recordkeeexpIng, inspection, tax3tiw. and then individual operators. The higher +� billing all ,end to dechiv, when the Lily con production experienced with a unit and d6al Mitt, s rarer:. iirile; r-r,thy rather than waterflood allows tha larger companies or F^ores i ire:�ivi�s. �i oil'cumpanie,. units to expend monies for better equiprreent and maintenance to that the newer i?everme*s to t.ht* City tied espec iala; to operations are usually quieter, cleaner and i the property tax on th-. ;rein,:-ral rithtn and lever polluting than alder facilities. Larger to sc /eranc-r. or "ve, 111rreV tax !w) companies or units lino experience production. lr;temsr.ingly, rnine l rights econnmfei of scab -- tt l9 less expensive to ess-cmernent iet tied to post proluct,ivity; tNis, Ondsuaoe or soundproo I a few Intensively if productivity v-ises, niineinl rictus usL-1 islands than txarWrods of IMNidual well vbi+jeticn rises, too. (ARN,u0i s.hrre are rend tank sites; the one larger unit can deal amportarrt limits to how quickly valuation wine these problerm more efficiently than roan rinse as n result of F-,opositlon 13.` A1r_, doxrp.s of irxiividual operators. as pruductivitf increases, revmnurz from ttw*, sev3rence tax whici-i is simply a pi-oducticn In surTunary, vinititation and Crons�oildation of ta*'rt►jst (tic: t ase, too. urban oil operations can be desirable for the following reasons: Of courm, there acre Berne negative Impoolls. Use of a centralizerf treatmr_rst - Oil production increases. - Less farm is used and unnecessary or } inefficient tanks and wells are removed. a 56C RePort'-#, in this series? "The Fiscal -• Tha appearance of the operations } Inroads of Oil Operations in Huntington improves; better mitigation of other .� DesCn" Huntirsgtoa. D-Vich alenning adverse impacts Is usually achieved. Oivlalun, March, 1961. - Coots to that City sand to decline but revenues tend to increase. i 16 �11 k 'Y w til r . �I y, 40 Roles fbr %J" Govemments in Roteethg Access to Of Fools 17,* wake of the Irticressed domestic oil N-m9ulaticon and the rapidly escalating production that may be afforded by price of oil should help to improve the WthstxW movory teehriologlee, as weli as profitability of potential units in the Ow ridvantoges of Lnit.lzation prod future. Arx)ther pricing problem is that the solidartion discussad above, wgue that valua of �JOMesti"! oL to the society may toot pratsctkV ftrfe-.e access to tonderground oil be fully reflertLd in Its (evert de-reguiateid) pooh and emoureging the formation of senit price bacaurw domestic production provides apWitltm to work those pooh mhy be other, lees tangible., benefits to the county y "t*!* policy objectives` This section related to the reduction of our reliance i,n tip do kinds of roles whI& might be fa,-sign sources for all. Tho situation might to for loco) governments In orgue for federal Incentives for lnereread pip ften objectives. dot estic production. " nW ilk ell, It ,hoard be noted that two of All these conalderationse, however, we . W ptoblarm which have elfiiblod national In amps and lie within the W d tM *46scquerk appliestion jurisdiction of the federal government, not tgrtf i ry rect.-ver/ methods the rounicipadity. the purview of the local Another Important problem rrlated to uroitlYMticn is the cost of formirx) a tonit, a mrpsnlee Nrvs sited low oil OWGC18HY the cost of getting anough unelrid by pri+ee corrttc14 as an eperotare to joh The existino Stew � n ' tnsry potntel units c � 1wy vntfseic� fet rr examp Ies of h@" bM n pr3fitahle in U* pest# vreys to rodtrca zoos* MMtas. 17 11 •1yy;( ,j„ •t , y; r We that the State regulates mineral rights solutions to these problems IIe putsick-, the and the urlitizatian of oil pool&; th.rr, the City'is purview. However, the City can help Mate, and not the City, Is than appropriate to implement any fut►ire corrective Olydletion for instigating policies eixi mtasures by the Ste to or federal tUUM aimed at reducing the costs governments by not excessively restrict!na crmntly aourleted with forming a unit. future oil operutisns from the evrface of the field and by daveloping ordinances, and In both of these cases, the appropriate role policies aimed at keeping ts;,ough surface of the local government could be to adopt area open ire the face 0; encroach Ong ordinances and policies which would not urbanization to accomodatt futuro preclude future ameliorative actions by the unitization and enhanced recovery progrartra. federal or State governments. The principal'tcole for achieving Viis area the -aditlormily, control nver lerir' use real; been City'3 GenereI Plan end its zmIng L, , domain of the Ioca; government ordinances. Options fo,7 Huntington Beach (although iaQally, States have pre-emptive regarding its land use policies are discussed i control over fond use.) The City should In Section6.tl. Be i►cxas reviewing policy E r#eWlze ttw two pmblems noted . above: options, however, it its important to discuss inspproprlate pricing and the sametimets the particuiar situstlar, in Kuruington Beach oxcessive costs of fox rnI►hg a unit. The City where t)iese 13sues nr�t espaclaby relevant. shnuid also understs that the appropriate That is the topii. of the rr.:xt &action. '+1 1 F 1 1 i YSJr i Y, r • t • fir.;•.r ' S ^R,j mr e � �►vvr� t Afy II As no tioned In Sactlon 2,.09 t`'we Over 55 oli companies operate on:y 90 wTownitrt/Downtow,n" part of Huntington active wE+Us. Ohe� ron has the largesc aingle Bens appears to be the most likely interest In this prat of the Veldt but it coWidate for a unitization and secondary accounts for less Own 20 percent of the rftevwy project. It h also an area where total interest. Aminoll, the otter major oil Tepid redevelopmen. of aid parcels and company in the r-Ity, hes virtually no wee" sand is pniiable. Therefore, this holdings In this part of the oU field; sass v#= analyzed 11pecifleglly with sagard (AminoU toes town some surface a► eve tt*re t6 tft knportance of pwtseirving access to from which wells have been directionally ftmWhkV oil rwervea- drUled to offdhcre poois)• arm studies; Is Inceted between Paclfic Thu% unitization has been difficult not only I I.NVYWay end Palm Avenue, from bacaun there are so many opeerators, but t:� Lake Street. Also, a also becwae neither cf the large companies air Jam oil I-ease tear Lake Street which havw the rasources to Instigate a Alt Avenue was included• A large unitization program hoc a pwrticularly large tm of thl$ r,-a lie; within the Coostal stake In this part of the field. 1 '►op PlWre 24). Cif the ` Aely 330 notes, only abaut 14 are i.Jl A Irlef H.. l �g aeed trr a production. Oil was first discrovemd in l`ientington Beach of this field t ws nevrr bur In 19200 at a site raw the p VWt. Igrgely becaver owrwrvhlp of lntemetlon of Goldsnwast Streit and Clay Is highly frogMented sax! P.wWw t. During the next aervs{a! yam, OR :;• a, tsar not, been schieverd• was discovered throughout KMtIngtPn IL 9 u! yy r Bch but the City pmhibited oil drilling in SEnca that time, production ties declined to the fiownlot and Downtown areas. However, a relative trickle. In 1979-80, 1311083 the sfimOrrued success of oil operations north barrels were rocovereo, an average of oily of 25rd Street (Coldenwest Street) In a 380 barrels per day for the entire area and bWley field (which Is now thee "5eseliff" golf only abort four barrels per day per well 8 sourer and reAdentlel development) Imnptsd the City to lift these restrictions In other parts of the City, notably the leases i192d and to allow drilling between 23rd north of Goldsenwest, the two mayor and 17th Streets. Two very important oil companies.. Chevron and Arninoll, run highly soles the "Jones" and the "Main," were consolidated operations which tap very large quickly discovered. The State Division of underground areas. These companies began OR and Gas noted that: applying water Injection In the late 1.950's end now have extenaivd water and steam "IntensivedrElllr�g activity followed flcod projects as well as several tertiary these two discoverles, resulting In the recovery pilot progrtma. These: companies fastest development and closest spacing have ernployod Hasse technologies to work expssrleaced In California to that date. these areas rrsuch rvre completely sand SO" wells were drilled on 25-foot efficiently then ►ether oreab in the field 10ts."3 whetre fragmented ownership has pmcluaiad unitization. The Townlot Is one of those Anothssar Important tons, the "Ter" or areas which has not yet been wsatserflo tided "8olse," wai found later In 1926. In because the larger ryumber of operators there Novernber of that year, the City opened the have nut formed a unit. rest of the Towwnh;t and downtown to � drll ng, except for a "fire zone" between In recent years, G'rsse Increasing value of land � Sth and 3rd Streets which was excluded In near the coast for vow uses (especialily fm ordsar to protect the City's principal t )using) along with declining production commercial district - a short strip along have prompted many oil operators In the Mein Street. On December 24, 1926 Townlot. to ab*ndon, their wells and to production peaked at 63,400 barrels frorn 78 redevelop their ,rites. Also, after the Local wells. Productim dropped quickly from this Coastal Tarr Is completed, c► velopsnent early peak and than grpdually deo-tined until pmesuresr cart the many oil in the the late 194010 -oast3l zone will likely Intenaily. In light of these effects, It sasppoarse very possible that During the early years of the field, so many of the oll sites in the: Townlot area development of the Tarr zone was inhibited will be mdeveloped that thera will not be bodies the soil in theses, pools, Is very thick. enough active well holes nor enough The vivcws ooze 'carried large amounts of available surface area for a future nand In it which often clogged the wells and secondary rsecuyery project. c"lleated lstetr processing. The growth in automobile use after World War II spurred This porsibUity raises several questions. such a high demsmi for oil that even thick First,, how much oil could be recovered if an crab bacerm profitable to extract arrd enhanced . recovery progrom wears prwess. This prompted a eserconl drilling undertak-.:i7 Second, even If these is a large earnpaip in the Trwniot area as opetator" amount of reernsining oil, hew likely is beW to exploit the psrevlousirly neglected unitization end a future secondary recovery Tar Zs . progr ►m7 Third, should the My take steps to help preserve *con to these oil reserves In 1954 all posolr were lo:aeted frarther south end, If no, what should those steps be? The In U0 field, hers` the Downtown- Intensive mnvskWer of this errport triers to gave drilling 1n this %Mjtheast exte;tnsian" of the tentative answers) to each of thssae gwAlona. Yoraralrt assaulted r another production peak In the Mid-19309a. 20 •h . I I %2'. Rernein F.�overable Oil Figure 3,1 The Mot 'Mnportant variable for ciociding wtwttwr the City should take steps to protwt surface areas for future access to 01 p0018 br the amciunt of oil thnk would be 109 if the surface is compistely dovMped. Udog• data tram the State Division of tail wW Goa (DDG) and from the rare jor all -1000 dries in Huntingtorn Teach, tree City Plennft Division estimated the renwining, remverable, oil in the Towntat •re,s. The pwpoas of these studies Is not to establish 00 exact numerical figure for the rertrsink V d'le! bo1s ell, but to Indicate whether there is erough ifg to snake on enhwvod recovery program ' ,:;: ,; `;`; �;. , � �, • '�:Possible and, thin if protecting surface lower woe wad access fcr such a program is `' Ir'�ports:nt. s tray Ttre first tachnique used to wtimote the : ,,,,...' -3000 rernainir'tg reserves Is the: "volumetric method," which uses data about the physical parameters of the field to estimeite the A voline of they original oil In piece (001K hones Thu% certain "recovery fineto!,-s" 'fij: .ur•..•. estimates of the parser *uge, of the otl that d i�t extraction ..4000 can be r�ecovere a by erent tec logies --, are applied to th.a 001P main sat iterate. In this way, o r d cm determine :;;;;;<..,.>:,:<:<:•,:.., .; how n xh olt could be mcoverresr, by an enchamed rmovery procsrarm This method requires trojch geologic �- informatioru First, unc must know what ol! zones underile this part of the field. Example of Cross-Ser:tion l-rde:rlying F*ure 3.1 allustratess a typical cross-section To wni 0 t. ur4or the Townlot eras, and Figures 3.2 and Bourne: Uivislan of Oil and Gas. S.3 *ww their oreal extent. 'Tao Important +aI.b$W V strata lm)ude the Mlidole Solsa, LA"M E10196, Stray or AC, Lipper Jones and Malm zc r•.1. Fiowevet, because of the lack of course, are not liqulrl prxris, :out ar,i rocks Of tltIjable dens, the Stay and Main z0fts which a:ontein aril In small pares ► etwe en WM that Included In the nrasuenatric grains, of solid materle,. Thusy the tote, adkr4fts. Thus, lire remits s.`rmid be an volume In acre:-foot must bs multiplied by a the earwarvwtive sldi. "porosity factor" M- ohs percentage of the rock which la not solid, but is actually by MAUPly' else area of a zone, In acres spaces or pees betwoon the wild materials, ! Ift tat thlQk'rass► in fast: the totsl volume and care holdthe fluids. Mvwevet, not all of of aura can be detwminod. The zones, that spno Is filled with all, Water Is also r, 21 RAM till] jk- 41W 4*2 sling n let I till I to.'Im 1111 C I*IC 11*** is 40 11 141j . found in the parer between the solid Table 5.2 summarizes the dots and materlels. Thus, the total valu" must be calcustions for 001P In the Townlot. The further redueed by a "water saturation" OOIP is estimated at 112.1 million barrels. faotor. By rmiltiplying area bye 1) thiokeesss, 2) porosity percentage, and 5) ■ The next step Is to determine .Nw much of water eaturation factor, the number of the OOiP can still be recovered by "ions-fast" of all lo determined. There are secondsry and tertiary technologies. After j ItM barteis of oil In an acre-foot and one discussing the performance of different can ettimate barrels by easing this factor. extraction techniques in 1-11untington B..tach � Firstly, Brother variable called ws "oil and other rwarby fields with engineers from I ftwrnatlan volume factor" must be the: DOG, Aminoll and Chevron, the conbldemd. This shviply adjusts for any following recovery factors were established difference between the volume of the oil for the Townlot/Downtown area: prlmriry, undetgroutrd end Its voluritey st the surface. .30; secondary, .12; and tertiary, .07 of DOW. Usually, the primary rate is lower and Tablet 5.1 summarizes these Ywiables and secondary rate higher; however, the the formula used Gu deeterminu 00113. an►gineers suggested that the very long term and umssually intensive production has Table 5.1 probably accounted far a `nigher primary rate and thus a lower potential secondary Sane in the 1'o�nrnlat area. VCLUldItTRiC ti1EYF-IG�a These data and these recovery factors sugge4t that over 20 million barrels of oil # A arcs in acres may still be recovered in the Townlot area # P poros;ty if secondary end tertiary technologies can H net thickness in feet be applied. SW water saturation B oll formation facWr To help confirm the reasonableness of this 7,756 : btlslacre-foot estimate, tM Planning Division calculated DC(p a uriginal oil In place recoverable reserves using another method, the "decline curve technique." This method uses the past performance of the field for A x h x P x U-Sw) x 7056 x 001P estimating future production. 1 .Formula for Volumetric !Method. The es'atirnate would be most accurate if the ar ival production records of every well ever Source: "Valuation of Utl Producing drilled In the Town lot/Downtown since 1926 Properties", State Board of were located, reviewed and totaled. This Equel ation, 1972. kind of research is very difficult and time-consuming. Instead, the Planning Reliable date for these variables waft Division researched the production difficult to obtain. W thickrmoses of the aummrriers for this part of the field found in � torn its the Townlot arm were unav'allable, sever,il DOG A=wal Summery of 2perationl mW were estimated from cross-sections and Brad tivq recent production records of active from dMctrr*M 1r severrel Cam` reports. wnetla. A reasonable decline curve was then Areal extect was estimated from contour interpolated between the few known data rrterpa of the *onus in COG reports. The points. iCummulative production wee then other veriables were obtained from DOG estimated from this dercHne curve. See " kuwatsy esrtimatet, As mentioned Figure 5.4, The total production for the etbov% the Stray tend Mein stones were Townlot/Downtown is atpproximste:ly 43 eeeachxWd due to le. of data; thus the rnllliore banv1s. sstimrrter leer probobly law. 23 i Ji 11� mill111 jp 13 _ ..�. . I!JKL vs of as W. Inn Wq Is AIM .Y 1 1 �< Y rlb 3 OL ,' ! t �z low as Taw ffm TOM+4m uvA bbs IAM nae 0",e 3 now 20d TWWWN ,ram. soon i ! JOAN 1 � i t mmor 7'awu l RO&K�los 1e4A0! A q ,�Araa�-Wa a Dow f 9% 1WA s Figure SA recline Cure for 7ownlot/Downtown. 5omm Rotington Stech Pleming Dtvteton end DOD. hMtwvw beach planning grin ie'li r Yi►MINWiIJIlkrli4JwIrMNV+ilrvv.NYa1N. �Y.11M.MW`IM1r.MNNMy.y.Wrl.Yl4+raaKwauvwwwy ,lrr.>..Ir 1 1 1 I • 1 t 1 1. i WWI i Table 5.2 w ' 4 ZONE Al H2 P3 Sw4 B5 Middle Ball* .00 .26 .30 1.07 `.Okt Bdlle 350 100 .28 .3Q 1.0; Upper Jorw 150 10C .3: .35 1.07 � 1 OW "5urnr cry of Operatioris"O 1958, contour maps 2 Estimated from various DOG reports 3 DOG and industry estimates 4 DOG estimates 5 C= estimates OOP a A h P (1-Sw) 7,750 11.07 Middle Bolin 350 x W x .29 (1 .30) (70758) * 1.01 = 39.6 million barrels Lawar Bole* 350 x 100 x .28 (1 - .30) (71758) t 1.07 = 49.7 million barrels LjAwr Jones 13O x 1f10 n .32 (1 - .35)(7,758) t 3.07 a 22.6 million barrels TOTPJ. 112.1 million barrels ' 1 ,. fta�rd ty factors Primary 30 percent 33.6 million Secondsty lid percent 13.3 ro lllion Tertiary 7 Percent 7.8 rrAllion !lo1r'ekft r rrar ble OU aSeaarw:ary and Tertiary ■ 21.3 million barrals 1 C411culation or OOtP and Remaining Recoverable OU Using Volumetric Method. Slaumms Kintington Beach Planning Division. %fir/ �,,� ORR w i 16 j �W �'1W�Y��Y1{7LA M11M.M.�__-_-�ti wnir •AIM{.YIJYNMMI.�»�.�I�1VMY ..w.•..... ... •..... ........ i.i •......... .•. • - •. 4 Ift'eur clearly indle•te• that production barrels could still be extracted if unitization In thk asp using current extractlan and the application of enhanced erseetho& is approachkV its IImI . Thus, Vichnologlos were successful. wnwie ive production ahwid approx Iroste all of prkwy production, whirr Is (using Theme calculations w*ro rmvibwed by the seine rasabve ry fsrctor as in the engineers at the DOG, Arninoil and w*16inatric method) .30 of 001P. If 43 Chevron. They concurred with City staff million barrels is .30 of 001P, thin OCIP that the methods used were sound, but ttat seat be 14) million barrens. Using the same the avallabie data may not be completely recovery factors as the volurnstric method accurate. Thus, Vie value of the analysis is for secondary (.11) sine tertiary (0) not so much In the exact numbers api in recovery, the stiff watirnates that about 17 providlrrj w) Indication that considerable all mUllan barrels could be extracted by reserves pmbably remain beneath this part ammol uy► arxf an additional 1,' mI.Mlon by of the City. glary. Remalnbrg ree:aysreble oli would be about 27 million barrels. Sae Table 5.3. 5.3 The Possibility of aaUnitization anti .n once ecF? —avcy—' rojec+t. Tho decline curve method suggests somemwhat lwger reserves than the The rinalyais above suggests that there is volurne+trieg which Is riot surprising becouse probably anaugh all mmalning in the certain known pnOucirig zones wart Town lot/Downtown area to rtsake an oxciuderl from itl a voiumstric sturdy due to anhanceed recovery project proMable if lads of data. Thus, the two methods give unitization could be achieved. "The next surprisingly aimllar estlmatee of mcoversWe atepo then, Is to try to determine what the reseErv*% lndicrtlrx3 that perhaps 25 rn!111an absteclew to unitization are anti if they are likely to brq overcorm In the future. Table 5.) Primary f'r Axtion x .30 OOIP = 43 million SIP ap 43 million (1/.30) ■ !0 million Swondary Prodssctic" W .1Z 00IP x .12 (143 million) a 17 million bbl Tertiwy Productirn a .07 001P s X (.143 million) a 1G million bbl Total rernalnirg, recoverable oil or 27 million bbls. Calculations of Rerrnsining Recovereble Oil Using Decline Curve Method. 5MM03 Huntington Beach Plsenning Division. 27 �r '^•T!l�l.WK1M4Y.✓•WMI/MW,INs.a.4.... . - - • .•• •,• u ,n .,n......... . :d•hld i.,•JJ.,,v•.,i hl•itlil l'dnni W.....Nu.1U., , ,..n,•u.... IutiWnl�.IN.HIINUNWn1.lWdua a.lJ NN.IMMti.I Yaw..i. . 1 1 •I In crater to do this, the City Planning The operators wars a�r+c askw.l to indicate% Olvialean ,sent a questionnaire to all then oil the reasons why unitization has newer been Operators in the Tovmloti0owntown area. achieved here. Most felt that too army of The gwstimneire and cover letter are the operators were unwillin , to join a unit lrcludod in Appendix A. and that past price cz-trtrols on oil tendared such an under taking urqerafi table. Several Yhee rawlts of the questionnaire are relspmdtants felt theft City Zoning aclemmarirec. In Table 5.11. Note that them restricticxcx related to drilling new wells had results can be measured in two ways: the contributed to the problem%. Other reasons first 4s slmply by the number of operstore given included the difficulty In securing who 9lrve different responses. A problem approval fn)m Isand awneersr to encumber with th;s is that all companies are weighted their property for many years. Another equally, although a few own 10 or more respondent suggested that the lack of wells whlls many have only one. The second reliable engineering data would hinder any method is to cola.elate the perec-Aagee of the unitization attempts. Mal lntemst in the field halc by the operators who gave a particuissrr ftsponsee. The City staff elan eioteed this lack of rsadUy This is a rornewhat chore me eningful aveallable date. ..re nsrure because the response of the relatively large operations %bill be more When asked if these difficulties could be Important to s exsitl2stian project then the overcome in the future and unitization mide very small companies. This method we9i¢tia poesible, the compranlesy were oquivocsal. 1• � each operator's response In proportion to thy: Seven optreto. s, accounting for 21 percent percentage of the field he owns. Interest In of the inti•reat in the fields answered "ye a the field was considered to corcaspord to six operators, accounting foe 41 percent of i ,nlneera: rldhtx valuations mace for this: area the field, said, '°maybe"; and five tao.Wenies9, by the Orwvp County Assersssor's offizz tar accountinc, for 12 percent of the interest in 1. property tax {purposes. the O.-lei; sespended "no." 1 Questionnsiress were sent to the 36 Finally, when asked if the company would be operators in the Tovdnlot/Downtown area; 21 intereet.nd in joining a voluntity unit, seven responded. This response Is indicative of said "yes"; five, "maybe" and nine, "no." one of the principal problems facing a Yat those responding "yens" and "maybe" unitization program: getting enough account for 61. percent of the total interest opesrstors to consider even the possibility of in the field, while those answering "no" forming a unit. Me wever, most of the larger account for 19 percent or the total operators did fill out the questionnaire; the interest. Interestingly, some operators who 21 respondents account for about W peeaeent felt there was likely to be enough oil to of the total interest In the Townlot Meld. make a unitization project, profitable, :+rid aroma who felt. such a project might be The all companies q tneeraliy c ocur with the feasible In the future, were also definitely mmly4s in Section 5.2 that there may be not interested in joining a unit — at least at significant oll roserrvas remaining in this this time. M►M o. Only three rmsponde nts felt that It was "very unlikely" that. them Is enough oil They results of this survey indicate that a to make a wateerflood economically v+oWntery unitization project in the Townlot pr'ofitabler,r and only one cited the lack of all area Is rwt Imminent. A;:hough a majority se a ressan preventing a watatflood at this of the working interest in the field appears time. Thirteon of rare respondents, to be interested in ouch s projerct# a aceeminting for about 62 penwent of Ow sliniticant minority is opposed to It. In working InLei-est in the field, answered "very addition, many of the operators (who hold Irately" or "perhaps" when tasked if there was about 20 percent of the Interest in the fiend) ee►rexeqh oil to make a wetbrflood profitable. did not rospond to the quectlonnaire at all. 29 • R 1 4Wna.Mi1hIIWM� N+4H{':%wll'Si4YN •iY1w1tMMMNM+1..rMNM1•aNa ••1•+•• Ir l•i..,•,,. ••.. ..1,•. . .. . .. , .,..,.,..r.1. t+N•IdJH•;,i+4•. \g44MM4MsiNM Y'n1HN11'•• .+uuuual..•..1•I>.p . ,. , 1 , `ilw�.�lr,r�alr�� .�w,�lswrlrr+ral�rar��+' r • 1. "u think theue In enough r+coverabl• oil in the Torrnlot/ Downtown rt of the Huntington Beach Field or. that a miter- !i WOUT461 be economically prafltable (if unitlZatiOn could be evhievo4? a Working Interest No. of >Resp-• ndent• in Towalot Fieeld • rV 'fry 3 5% ry� K S �. 2+ if you think there le enough oil to make unitization and writer.. flooding in the Town".ot ftree profitable, do you think othtr abstacles can to overcome, sa that such a project is possible In the future? l t working Interest No. of Respondents in Townlot Field i ff ? 21% d G 41% no 6 12% n 3 6% �WL..U..Y.1 Which of the following j:o&aons do you think have prevented a wateerflood program from 1appe ring in the Tomnilot area? No. of Respondents t o h 4 X 12 1 n to o n roe con ' 11 eo r r . n 6 � answer na used: 1epk of data difficulty 1.0 getting i `twal of Sand owners to encumber surfaces properties. MOM ---�� 4� Mould your camInny be interestoO In joining a voluntary unit for the purpose al waterf locdiny'l e Working Interest No, of Respondents of Towalot Field ft !e r- 7 24% Astad 37X itely Mt 9 l � ISC ed Table 5A Questiacnaire Resulu. Sources I-AmUngtic.n Beach Planning COMSIon. dMW dell i r �yryµ�..INIiY W�MMw wMY•.Mh1Y1.K1MMw1.IH.FWMYYIw•MMy. wMw sew w.•..w...lr�.++■rr.w,l....� Yr../r•'h••oMr sew•.1.1. ••..w M I.ywy�111Y M v/• I V I 1 Y r 1 I r . 1-rhb look of response undarlines the F!qure 5.3 Illustrates the arras In and near diff1wity in echisvirq unitization 0. this the Townlot Brea %tore oll well drilling Is buns. The campanles are also equivocal on currently allowed. These a* llrnited to the whether unitization Carl be achieved in the leases operated by Chevron and AminoA future. The principal reason I-aiding up northwest of Coldenw*at (sites 01 and #21 unitizatliore, now that price decontrols (ire an Island operated by Chevron at 17th offwted, will be the inability to get enough Street and Perlin Avenue (site 031 a operatorr Intarrested. The, many reasons why relatively larger erne operated by Chevm operators may not join a unit have been near Lake Street red Atlentas Avenue (alto d iea,ssed above. 04) and a small bland owned by Amino ll between 18th end X11th Stnestr along Pacific A unitization project in the futum is still Coast Mighway (cite OX This lr art site is possible, especially if either of the following intensively used for wells directionally "scenarios" develop*. First, as the value of *Hied under the ocean and 1. is unclear tt a land Increases many of the operators whether this area wauld be m►ellable for "rill choose to sell their sites. The smaller walla tapping the Townlat area, at least In companies with few wells arxi low the mar terin. All of the other sites would productivity will tend to recycle their land very likely be able to atcomodate wells end first. 1wressingly, the working inteerects in either facilities in ± T*wnlot unitization and the field will be, held 4 compe,iles se.":lidary recovery project. Figure , 5.5 Interested in continued oil prodixtion. shown, all the existing oll sites In ' the Towrilot area. City ordinances currently Scomid,, In the face of domestic oil allow existing wells and redrilling on most zhorteges, the State or federal government of these parcels, but, prohibit new wells. may enact a strict compulsory unitizat!cn law in that secondary and tartl.uy The sari•fece tree needed for an enhanced extraction technologies can be applied to rescavfry project depends largely on the domestie oil flalft These laws would number of wells needed to prodme the require agreement among a smaller majority pool. As dbeussed In Section 3.0 above, percentage f. the operators before enacts in ectimi snd production wells am usually corn l o a unitization. For example, some a arrann� to atterns to fsciiitbtee the Stag �ire as little as 60 percent of the efficient sweeping and subsequent collection Interest of the fiseld to agree to a unit of oll i(. the zone. Consequently, rough before fdm-;rug the remainder to join. estimates of the number of walls needed In Crureirrtly, compenlies holding rnora than 60 an enhanced recovery project can be mode perecnt of the Townlot working interest k, calculating the spacing of wells in a may be already, at least tentatively, pattern and dividing that factor. into the Interested in a un It project, total ,number of sera In the torte to be worked. For example, engineers at the, 3r4 Surface Area Requirements Division of Oil and Gas estli�nated that the ..�,_,..wl�.l_.�Y.� 1....__.. spacing for a waterflood project In the As the City molders the Iowa of helping to s zone would be approximately one well preserve surfam areas for future oil peer .10 acres; and that only shout 25 wells operations In the Townlot, two key questions would be necessary for this kind of project arise: 1) f4w much -area is neade!d to there. accomadete . .3 waterflood or enhanced recovery project? end x) where must these ,The characteristics of the zone will affet sites be located? Much of "ha Information the kind of recovery method u3e:d, !filch used in answering theme questions was ruu ld in turn affect the spacing and the suppli::d by the, DOG wd by Eas�msn number of wells needed. 'the Boise zone, WEilpstock, Incorporated, a company for example, holds a very viscous oil; thus, Involved in directional drilling projects. steam, rather then water, would likely be 30 �s'!• 1 "ton �smsI o� 006 F } al:s 9[D a] [D 00 10 OD ID • RI[D a][H[fl [fl 91 In tE[D[E m m • R 1 Wt 1 lira + WMPa � a • .s Figure 5.5 Drill Sites sW Qthw OU won S-Htm In TcwAaAXmnWwwur Scmes HjWMtory 1 owh Pbmkq DIVbUm. . -a 4. C w 1 . / 1 I in;w fuel lrrto ft fea►rrratieyn ► *cause the hot Thus, the surface area currently afforded by *tenon hrips the thick oq to flew mv-," the drill oltes (014 in Figure 5.5) In and freely. gorse the oil nruat be kept worm near the Tm mlat/Dawntown could probably f is to k1us to wu*, and beet use the accomodato the wells needed In a swearWary Mom and *11 Bonds to cool as It mvsa or tertiary recovery pwJact, even In a throws a 10rmatION the spacing of the closely spaced steremflooda walls es+ust usually be much closer in N Another I •t m progrwnn than in a watralood. Importantex>naidrration, though, iften at 00 CCG estimated Vat am the loclstlan of thee* surfesae areas rrlotives WON der S *care or wren ono WOW per 2.5 to tho underground ON posh. As mantioned r sates ndght be neoded to affect this kind of In Section 1.09 wells can be ditae;Lionrlly is t�nr. Thus, from 64 to rs many as 126 drilled so that a few centralized surfacer wells mlvht bit neaded In n stet#mflood of wean can sccomodate walls that produce a the Townlot Bolas sexraa. much larger subsurface was. The most Important constraint an tow for a well can Considering Me usual setbacke from public extend ftorm a surfacer site Is the depth of right-sf-wry and from nearby uses, the the zone the well Is topping. The shallower surfed was needed for well drilling and zones are more difficult to roach because nuintes owe, 25 wells or more . could be the angle of the well must be Mors acute. really occomodatod an an all operation site Eastman Whipstock cslaulerted the distey s roughly the die of w square block in the that a well. could be gilled in the Townlot Townlot area. ores under umml economic and geologic conditions. Welk topping the Solos z ome could reach only about 195Q0 feet from toe Figure 5.6 surface bore hole; walls Into the much deeper Jones zone.wuld extend about 2,4W • feet from the besre hole; (see Figures Stir and 5.7� Using them estImatea, Figures 5.8 and • Depth , 5.9 Illustrate how much of the subsurface Townlot/Downtown field can Lu reached from the existing drill altes. If part of site —11 0 05 is considered ava ll able for this kind of project, then virtually ill of the Jones zone can be reached from the presently ova ll able drilling isItes. Likewise, a very substantial part of the Bolas zone Is also accessible frorn the eex lot Ing sites, although a considerable arson In the middle of the Townlot may be Inaccessible. Engineers from Cheevrvm and Aminoll Indicated that wells could be extended even farther then these satimated limits If 4 -• necaesary, although such wells would be 1000 2000 more difflcralt to mill and nvree expensive. Lateral Extent A steam project adds a further factor Into the analysis. As discussed above, steam tends tc loge itas heat after It moves away Directional Drilling Pattern for Wells from its source (a boiler). The 5ott2nn of f erg i the Bolas Zone. then steam Injantinn well Cannot be mote 9 than IvOOO 1,500 feet from the baileRr, otherwise the steam losers en much heat rs Serute;ees Eastman Whipstock. It travel% through the, well that It Is Ineffective when It reaches tht oil pool. f ISO •!" t4.,•, 4+�y} aiY/IY1rM/�MMM..�wMN1YYYrM11 ...�.rw.w.r.war+iyr.wr.•.n.... "' Vim^ � 1 4.. f z . f ArsIorss k� E3 M7. ......■■■ 111 El, r ED F- I L-3 I FE- Ll '- LE L.w._.• hMa M 9:d''z fi '•tip'' `` r 33 �aa � partim of the pt of existling drill site El [EID 'r saw - now 1 # Figkire 5.9 Approximatei 4 Source: . s ♦ _ 1Olvidan wW DOG. NA*)gkn bewhI.RW-M-M Pj *::, . J% .r 'a�w4 F MYWwrwM w•..•.W{M N N W W•IN.I MMYM MIM1.Yi .af M M r M •/Y r.IW OVA low r � lather way of lacking et the situation is Figures X7 that in order to undertake ■ comprehamlve e+r*e ad mcovisry program for the Townlot/O*wntewrt, now wells or the redrdling of existing wells mwy bd needed in the seer s+ 4 ly between 6th and 13th Streets. Furthorrra because of the is problem of host Iwo in a steam pyo*t, a steam stator (boiler) may also need to be locate n this area. The current soninq laws sffeetlnq the existing oil situ in this 's Wwo allow the boiler equlpmernt and Mdrilling, but do not permit now wells. In summary, a waterflood or other enhanced recovery project for the Jones zone, a►md i presumably for the sleeper Mein zone, oould probably be accomodated from the existing 4. drilling altos -in the Townlot•/Downtown one. A comprehonaive program for the ahallowst Salsa zone woulu probably involve #teaming, end might require some rww S -w4M wel* the redrilling of existing well@ end the location of steam pro&ning equipment autald , the exleting *111 alter In on area 1pgpppp between 6th and 13th Streets. Littoral zxt*nt There are %'unwtly several oil "motion elten in this sass which could be utilized in Dlroctlarwl Dr1U1 pattd n f such a project. the zoning on these sites W° allows the redrIlAng of wells and the �ft a horses Zone. installation of off recovery equipment, but 30-ur�ort €astman Whlpvtock. does not allow for the drUling of now wells. I This foot sts that a second re pn*ram' ("rnflo � vod�, which utillsed only the exis g drill alter mlgltt not be able to Inek4b a siriflow t part of the Golsa toner (Muoly bbtwdon 6th &W 13th Strarta). '"" 35 , V F y I f A I• J M 11 x W P 'i MIS, •f!��4 P++'.. nor' • , ,r^ � r'r• , •' r• �Ir11�Jf�e�RI n"'FCf(w� �Fj�'��Iy'r�A��T7 ',4�!i' �A �1yAr . . ;I� ,',1M'1/ r., 'r,•;�+lrM.' '?rl `y.�4k ' 1 K.' i, � •1 ' 71r 1 r 7 Irk,• Jw'l:�`'•1Ca 1�., F}�,,,°�/{Iy:YIM�)�� .rl n ' , . I r 1 h , „ ly COG" for the lt� X iM1 If1 t N!'bM1ixetion for the, fecillties necessary HOC ' 4rf *11 am probably be op,� enhmNd recomy pwjwt if unitizatlen i aw . t4 Is reaked. In ft tins nod Z). WIV fOWNW wo egad that any advem Invaats. an rtrarby uwwss y A, �4',•� , . F -von d,p 0 d. Althrish a olxh n6 houoWq mid coastal fterrratlart are of the of opwators there he" enitigoted to aeaa►ptable level&* ^fir; a• C M ' '*kwost in awd1 a urt1tl!24kJ n qr atrt appear likely in r . . * Analysis by the Clty . PlembV staff # d .,dw the kinds of indicates that potentially adverse "Put OWARiMe wouM directly irtt wto resulting from an wftfreed WkW40a wW oi"mod recovery project can usually be ;' i f ► WoOn 04 jwhdiction of re�lti rdf tacrt, o,cr, +ajar;to "MM am bard to, ndw a uWasi rable effoate w%J :,d City VU = increui iri woAchd wwS in sawn qbe the Yawnk4lD�owntewn. A disewsolon Y' fie of d of P~t1G1 ter and "Ir mitigations is liviuded In erwther report In this aer lei 04: "Entranced Oil Rwovary fiechnolagy". •M M1Yld• I IYrY...•.Y•Y•.y •.,1.:... M O&M FIN M Thh awdon dbauaes the padoy ePtlorrs neater than thrse acres. Will tits /1 in 8"p to rho MY fait ptatrw VWQ surface Figure 5.1 is designated O.2. For purpoelns UMN g MUM unitkotl+an p"jaot Is of this disousolon, there Is no prwectiaal botip rod dr, "g it b woo that such a difference between 0-1 end 0-2. The r it o unliksly that restrictive Important paled is that both permit new M1 penalss wo tlrmwmable of Ur wires. wells, while the O suffix arras not* i tlers The disoession In Section SA lndbMtod that are the five oxisting drill altos �Id probably accommodate an enhancsd recovery proyramO except perhaps for a Cor+slderlr* the Tong hiatocy of oil comprehensive ateamflood in the Solna oporatkm in Kmtington Beach, as well m tone. The stearnflood might require the baftfits that all production contributes additional surface was outelde the drill to the osrmrnerlty such as areployment and sites, somewhere between 13th and 6th mvenws, the City% land-uss regulations Streets. There are several existing oil have trad►tlerrlly accommodated oil operation sites in this area which are monad ` acti�rltlari. Ch thus steam equipment and redrillinq we i permitted, but no row wells. ro City currently uses three zoning dbtrlctsr called 19D," V-1" and V-2," to This indicatas that curre�% regulablans allow oil apatatIons. More specifically, would allow unitization and anl;anced each of thwart is u zone suffix which Is recovery. The relevant qumstion, however, ,attached to a boas zonkV designation such is how long will there sitris be available for as ritoldaatlal, oornmerelal or ► uNstrlsL such a project? Both lira uses prrmitt+sd In the bast zone, so wag as that oll-ralated activities permitted Because the O, 0.1 and 0-2 districts we by tho suffix zone, can be legally car ted only suffixes, other was we already an the alga. permitted on these sites. At eery time, the operator may abandon his all operationa, and The "M Is the truest restrictive of the oll new developnnsrnt can be constructed on the suffiixos. It permits wells srOk other site. The loss of any of the rernalning drill o11-related equipm. ent, includit those whicli sites end the lose of the other oil operation millet be used In an arhharrcod recovery sites, piarticularly In some parts of the project. It allows the redrilling of existing Townlot, could potentially preclude a future walla, but does not allow any n w wells to enhanced recovery project. be *111ad. 'rho prim1pal purpose of this suffix Is to anew 91MInq walls and the Through Its land use regulations the City kindo of activities which amid be reamo rably can go beyond simply atccomodating erpeatad in association with there wells. enhanced recovery projects now, and help to This b the designation on most of the all keep altea available for such use In Uw operation sites remaining, In the future. Strategies for achieving this we Tawnlot/downtown area. They are shown in discussed in the following sections, blank In Figure 3.5. 6.2 Sti-sto ioa to Help Preserve Exlst!29 The *061" dosigrott'an all-3ws all the uses DrUi Sites permitted under the O suffix, but also allows now wells to be drilled. drill sites 2 Any enhanced recovery project will require throuO 3 In Figure 3.5 are designated 0-1. a significant rr ember of new wells. The 00-21" suffix allow the sarm weer as The existing drill sites area large enough 0-1, Met appiies to ail op,!ratlon sites 37 Yr M. 7 ' r r i r '��YP� 14i" yry •M ••••MMN.IJIN•N/�wi,r..a..Mti M � rnrrnodswto this anticipated number of Permit only now liars which do anal ► We arrd on dlsfxlbuted over the all zorms cover the drill efts (or party of the diriil In + a way OW MW of the strets van be site) extensively with permsrnarst pool# by d)reot stally drilled %mils. Thu% structures. These uses rMlht Inelwk p�400 1d11 0. these existi. drill sites is commercial recreation facllitios *uch y h priority fair kopih1 open as "rninisturo golf$" or oar thin optiond future ey ed muvery commerolei establishments like Vardon ptpjlrpt. following strategies might help supply outletk or self-serve gas io Oteteek threw► Sitess stations. $rah uses would have to be reasonably feasible eonsidering their - to base de ate rather than location " appropriate considering _ If ths existing ban zone were other nearby usaa renwv enact the 0-1 suffix wear to become the base xona ter the site, than a 4evoloper The City might also establish regular review would need to comae to the City for a xora periods after which the owner or developer manage totem new uses could be could request a re-evslustion of the site for c�ensttuated an the drill site. Before the an enhanced recovery project. if the City Zone would be permitted, the determined that an anhanceu recovery ` Plonnheg7ornmission and City Council project wen re longer practical or that the f would have to approve the tone change and site was no longer important for the success the now use+ The City might require one or of such a project, the restrictions an the! use oil of the following before allowing new uses of the surface could be removed. an the caul alter: Chan-it Goners 1 Plan desi nation on all drill, An analysis by a petroleum engineer tee to esoures Producti an r showing whether an enhanced recovery important -goo or regulating land uses j projeet in the Townlot area Is besides zoning Is the Cityt General Pion. Worocticsl or not. If ,such a project Is still possible, the analysis should The General Plan indlcetew In general Indicate wl-tether the drill site In terms, the kinds of uses which are question is necessary for such a appropriate in different parts of the City. project. The analysis should also For example, drill site dt 1n Figure its Is indicate if only pert of the carfare area currently designated "resource production." in the drill site is essential to sudh a This means that activities related to oil project. extraction are the most appropriate ones In this area diring the "plannirng period" (which Retention of part of the drill site Is usually 20 years). Before other uses surface n open space, available for would be permitted therms the developer future oil operations. This open arrface would have to obtain a General Plan or" should be large enwo to not only arnendrnent from the City. Drill site dt is accommodate the equipment necessary designated "planned development" erred drill for the enhanced recovery project, but sites #1-5 ore In residential designatlais. If also any buffers, wails, screens and these sites were also changed to "resource sound-ereafing barriers used to protect productim" then aU extraction would be the the nearby uses from any adverse principal permitted use, and a Generai Plan Impacts related to the future oil anvnelment would be necessary before new► operstlor.s. These open spaces could be uses would be allowed. Incorporated Into the design of the new development and used for such things as The advantage of requiring a General Flan recreation facilities or gardens, so long amendment rather than a zone change is as there were a clear understanding that the fcrmrer usually entails a nth more that such areas might aiso be used for extensive review by the City's staff end all operatico►s at a future date, policy-makers. 39 ,. F I b IIr1�M.k/..w.w ••... i. .• Y..MYYMM-YMVMF�•.I/.•YYdY r.rx.YAM•YYLLMM,--unrn .• .... -w.tin••w.Iww.. In....•.x.•1.............•.n.N Y�11YIIyHYyW/wM�Ilirr+.w.. .. .r.rr..r.r.r.x MNMIYYMwnxr•••1i•••• • • •r now low I I 1 Thin al d#* woum dot oeroldoratiom ilke A d1badvatAMp to this approach le that It A tre projects will be moors adds, (almost literallyX a now Is or of City porn baly Mulyzed before e�lrarrpta are land us reaohttlons, In oddltian to the , �maw+kt, 'fla kinds of -esWiefloro that existing General Pion and zone" be pIOM d an than die by the City ordi,owes. Now review procedures would WOO allaawl" new wore would be the same need to be developed In der to 1"Jermmt as in 00 a&* change mesa direuased above, this approach. The advwM44 of the overlay 1 lowrsm the err ea mlerm for the detailed Is that it emomaizes the lmpartsma, of ravlraew wMah would be reWlred An that can protecting woos for enhanced socovory an al *4* rouble hod for General Plan projects and It helps to focus the analysis of arrtendnnanta, but, art not normally exercised now uses an the enhanced recovery Issue and currently far sore dmmes. not other peripheral ones. A disadvantage Js that the General Plan 6.3 Preserving Other) Oil georstIon Sites currently does not usually differentiate land (Zoned PJ In the Town lot wntown use carom visa an areas smaller then 20 acres. The Intent of that General Plan le to The City array went to ems1der applying the Indicate gonoml Uses far rolst1wly large strategles discussed above to the other oil arose In the City, leaving crate detailed gyration sites In the Townlot/Downtown festrictlom an a alte-by-sits basis to roaring was which are currently zoned O. Starne of ordinertceo. A significant excepticn to this these sites could be irnportant to a ie the c ostal zons, whery land use comprehensive enhanced recovery project. designetione have been applied to sites much Many of these sites, howeever, we very small anrellat than 20 acres because of the spwisl strd welly close to other uses. The minimum resouress aso oirtred with the coast whIch surface area necessary to secarnmodate a regular more detailed plannirgh even at the iirllling rig rscornrnended by nurnerous oil Chman d Plan level. Grill sites 019 20 A, and conq antes and well drilling companies is S are in the coastal zonal oo this kind of, approximately 100 by 200 feet.* Sites specificity in the land use designation %viid which ere amallerir than this rWnim m may not be unprecedentsad. not be appropriate for future re-t#cUling said, taus, might be excludeA from consideration Ovearl nd conditional-vie ermits; In a future enhanced recovery project. er neat t ty cou d help protect surface woos for future oil 6A Perm_ittinaa Nlow.Wells in the Townlot operations would be th�nx* an 'ooverlay" end a caowlitione�l-use permit. The City Besides protecting the existing drill sites could lrsdicate that the Townlot/bowntown and some of the larger Q-zoned sites, the arise is a special resource production district City might also consider allowing new wells by a general "Overlay" designation+ Bofors in the Townlot, If Ow raw walls were part coMin altos In the overlay district could be of a unitization and consoUdstion prograff% and for a►ctiritieo tither than all operations, l*w wells outside an existing drill site may Us developer would be required to apply for be Important to sin enhanced recovery and rMalve, a conditional use permit -1- that !s, a perwtrit allowlrg now uses, but only after a Cat; review and-analysis, and only if any ccnnditlam placed on the now uses by the City aft o eepted by O-w developer. These Planning staff contacted the following conditions -vuld Include the enhsnrcerd companies: Chevron, Arninoil end recovery analysis and reservation of open Collforniea Production Services, as well Space which were discussed in the zone as the COG. change option above. 39 A.1 •;l ill�, � 1 ~ w��yrNR n..I••a.+a..ni......rear MA.Igrr.w.v .........awl•+MN..w•LM•.rw.•... . ....•.w wwMw•.......1. ....r ... ....wl. I.r..,r�MHMNIM+rwr ..... .. .. .. ...nn..n i.••.v w..•.......... .. .. . ' " t if eseis�tl w�Us aamt be ran 912d The aim of thM14081 oiley Is to protect end at "ors a� 4 ir+oufflalent anti esnharree thr and reoreational *008 to oerrgriete the kojectien prtitwym anwitles •ffarded by the boaah whilo Now wolia dwold only be permitteti If they tti oS activities which must be assert follow atltwirls 1) do a1N is located to. to view of this approach, lams than a minimurn sim 'a*,j mitigatlorww r ver mtlon of glen Chloe Desch fat future of any potontial adverer Mrtpaats in ON facilities 4"Wors inrppropriate. I prrrrrtsd into the prijoetr Vol ')) the i*wover, If new failiftles essential to the r w u it port of r everail unitleokion or recovery of the ad deposits underneath the ,j ao= Nation pt"tom. wolementing Towniot could riot be sited any where alas, stroUgIss Include developing a ram coning then the City my still permit those ordlnanos or utilizing an overlay district far11191 s to be located an the beach if all of with sa aartditinrsal.uss permit requirement, the conditions listed above are met. simllat to ft strategies discussed In Section However, because this is a .State bench, the 6.2. California Departno, t of Parks and Recreation would also have to give Its 6.3 Cat ow Possibilities„for New bill Sltt parmisslon before resew walls cculd be drilled. 9 Derides the drill altos dkcuaed ebeove, !hers ft'share Locatlam., Another possible ass othesr posslblitles, which should be location 7or all Militias needed in an discussed. enhanced recovery project is offshore. NONA Chico Stater Beach: Past of Solas In this coal preserving surface locations In to r ate sa cro.r P801fle Coest the Towniot Itsalf would not be lmpartont, Hioway along a IoMo section of the although some *whore sites might be j M Tevrnlot/Downtown area. Several wsUs said recess nary to tap the more Ireland miaterd oquipm of are active In this arse extremities of the all pools. Wells and vhldh is current-ly aornod 0. Wells related equipmm" t can be located on directlonally drilled Inland fram this strip offshore platfe errns, man-made hiands or could cover a large part of the Towniot and piers extending from the stoarm Because 1 could be very useful In a comprehensive these wells would be reaching inland, they f enhanced recomy project. A sericuo would be located as close as passible to the problem with using this Brae for more ftre. Thua, a pier would be the most likely Intattaive oil operations is the conflict facility used if an offshore location were between thorn activitiesess and the ores% use chosen. as a heevily-visited, public recreation facility. M light of the high priority In the The disedvantages of using a pier for oil Coastal Act given to public recreation along facilities include the following: 1) risk of the shorreline, the City% LCP includes spills which oould odversely affect the policlu which encourage the "pMse-out" of recreation beeches, x) degradation of visual wells on 8olsa Chico Beach. New wells are re-ources associated with the shorolinee, 3) not iOrahlbited from locating an the beach, conflict between Industrial and recreational but can only be sited there If all the uses of the shoreUne and 4) conflicts following coalition are met: between mobile, portable oll equipment and other traffic. 1) The resources are not recoverable from any other onshore laocatiext or existing Advantages of using a pier Include the platform, 7) the site Is Impravnd to become fallowing: 1) valuable surface areas onshore r:tontpetibla with recreationuses of the could he Reed for other uses, and 2) the pier beach, 3) public health, safety and welfare could be designed to accommodate putolic are not Jeopardized, 4) adverse recreation facilities such as fishing areas owimment.sl impacts ary mitigated to the and look-outs, and the private sector would maxirrium extent fessible, 5) the net overall probably be willing to finance the entire Impact of ail production facilities on visual proposal. 'The pier would have to be reswrce,� Is unproved, and 6) sofa access to designed to reduce any conflicts betwenn the beach is provided. the oil activities and the public: recreation facilities. 40 41, Park - �.- sae MMMMMMMMMLIJMMLALJj 1.J 11 SenLioyr{ ' Rec. + in 01 1, ; : [DID 10 ID 1100 7ftulw�rTr4urlffl MIM �` ' LZJ rt v 0� oil lAa•e# ia■�as�cfa - pvbuc Dumb dam .16ar _ + F � Figure 6.1 City-owned Properties in TownlatlOwntalmu � - SOUMM Hntirrgt,on Baed r� b ItIllaach each w ► v • 4M� 1, ,,, a M A TM My% pWmbl wW van ft jurlodlutlan dod Sher POsslble Act�ar�� 11M W ONWId boys d tt RMOn NO t!ds UM TM 1010 LGW Cau "bd n w"ulata Them an other kinds of actions related to drrrrsldpffl" In %bb am. T uu% the city protecting aurfses areas which the City 4m only ril�reree MI�a1lti�e Offshore should earrsidar. FI: the City rt'.*y want Ila�lapaophRr Mwtt OWMt raulete Wash to hire a profoselonii pet.,oleum enoirnser to 4ovaWpowt dtro,lye analyze the possibility of unitization and enharaed "mmvery In the !nWvs Anoftr aptlan for Townlot/Mwirtown more completely bofore erects for future oil onaoting aan ordkwees or other land Use fac1111itilrs far the City to retain prwpWtlee testrictlom Such a study may establish It ownr Itself and to restrict urn on the more exactly the likelihood of such ■ owe wets of the eurfte. Flown Ga prajectp as well as its surface area 0 ft Ctt wed pnipartles in and near requlramentL This In tum could allow for than 1`ownlet=town and 10 lketes the the development of afore preclse regulations. uewe cur�ra tly located on each. The btrplementation oppmeeb would be to limit Secondlyp an analysis of the remainder of atrustures so that seetlem of these the City may be helpful to locatr other properties we presetved teals such limo ports of the field where unitization and thurt in en wwod recovwy project Is enhanced recovery prolacta am possible j and rho o City wwld then call or loans where protection stmte?Ovjnlot les similar to ;46C lia r Wow arm to the unit praposinq the dismued for the might ba pao)WL The City twld still use arose eppiopriate. P .le$ until that tiffs 'fair focliltirs like perks w petkk q Soar whWh 1aave large parts of tom. surfs" free of permanent stnatums. The City would parlodicslly aw►im as properties m wvsd few potential Wofte i recovery projects to determine If sash pmjseta are still ptkalble and If partlawler pnI ertlas would be lrnpertant for tlrs pnar*ts. r r ^.I, "'41:�' i S^ r +i r 'r 7 ,f�, F •r4 �, , �/ �,. r 1 ' , . w + ��° � I' ^ � f� � I�rr '� '�'n'+;ry M1�" ',Ir1 'Y'i'*,I +"lJ�vr�('• _ r.V #7rYwr♦ ''+ld r . .i '' wv...:."._.. w . ��:aw.n.. 4 Skit yh ti it r I, 1j�1 45, Ir 4. if I •r' mdh The Oty s Ov'p'ipal Tole k% this ia! e. M .. ; 4 ,. , to, bil• coAml, land Was, 0 •that ~0 m be *11ed 0 uihtti It iR •c9ear I ; Vie ft' ��Alin Ocetion of so tie lag er �h InorM oticaL Mme direct aatims alhi& ;4� p &mbtmmft NOY would w*vuivq* unkixotion and fhe uai of tarr�q ► rit 4 anhenced movery mdthade acre e V it �pre►priately with.n the jurisdicUans of to and f0dr, I vemmaots. 'tt <{c: • ma ft doulo mmko r policy and legislotiat ( of Iry�!�pm�nta alt those laves of 9&mrnmwAs ' 7 arils ` ' 001SUOL 1006 Ortitkation OW � 10r«0'WYr a well at to developnr;ents in ry ltsrilt to better -it ,. ,Y � i1i batt ditt~erfrtir ' WAr h pmomrm are. likely. in FU tirgtan a Bch., By watchkv tamer developstonl,% of , to IftevW . tier well es by periodically avaitiating they' r :,a?'Sa Alt!► ' grid O"de, tlts! for new pmjeG is iftt Hurst irg iva►ey n to kv O Wu OVtan Oftcht tto City can Y wtinus to promote Slum WOW74 Onditkm WO similar polleles whidt help to pmteet and camfully Mini the 7ow4ett mmalys Whom 1) utilize its imparts urc s. nt o1i rvso s 1 vi"t of oil nary still .xia in mSri I awau orconderlr and other m cams moths* heve not how 1ipd* snd whets z) now devetapmmt Is ly amweachkV an the all Rich t the surface to Mich Iml 1'y extraction 1 11t ma mst bs a 'amodlabOd. " I 44W 1 'yam,• 7Y K 1 kk y { Y�Y1yr.YL i1 ti , SiYJ.:YY Yn.�Y..��YY11M�•.V.ni...• .. ....i..•.. ,yr Yl/Yr.f/Yy7 Y.. Y..M. . 1 Y 1 s ; NOTIts BAR i 1. Gttifamiv Coastal Act of 1936. i wola ego Resaums Cah, 0IvM1an ; Chapter 3.3. ILIA �: W 'ai�aa,an Ur.._n. ._ti.. WW C�...._. �,D�..w., ejonr 8p . - . C,v mW Amen D. A., ''Hunts ton Basch Oil Fields Summer of ` Vol. 44, 1" . 7* Kanter* A« 1«r arwa'Iwd, W. 1.., and Aften. Do P!.# RSou"ast Extension of the Townlot A " !Mft of 0 rotitru Viet 41p 1155. 1 L &Afttm' Bomb Planna49 Division, "Heal krgcte of DU Opomtlonr In Frtingtaft 1 i �r 1 I a r • •,7f,4i;, ',�,r,'rl�• ,w i � r kw P MIX rN�•A h 1 ' a • +'r PG N f (hossUor mils wW Covw Letter Y I. A�•,,�: ;/\, a .�, as 1 .1 45 I •11 Y ` I � r i r*--'r`rw�Y.. IYrwMMM1ii1�1�....��.._........,.....r. .•�.......+-.�r�.r.........._. .- • .. ......w.�.«..... . ....•....., . t Crr '` OF HUNTINGTCYAM BEACH P.O. Mix IN 0FDMLGPM2UT$1M/W= CALIFORNIA92M �LML�'rIMM�IYl dwl iAt PLAMMOR 011►OM 014 SM401 rJW $irk 1 #aim fa iced oil * in urban aroma the A ssure for new wlopr�r�ent an the r�PW ob. fielkk and osrrtremial structures or* ha13t now WtIW oil D wmrface areo� frc �n which now wells could be &111,sd and craw teclx>al � t Iw�d ore amered over. This ommuro for now rilofrnmd an oil flows is 3 in the City of HmtlrV1 Beach, and the C.it is that VON" oil reserves may be lost in the future'E. oil fields are cwMittely ' �►. r�i �►' laprw,rrrt� yTia. Cfty P14ming LtWan is stu*11 ry t=uterflood tial pboA As part of " stWrg we a �1w #t if o UnItIm lan project is proariblei In ** Tomlot f ' It p�t 0,f " City, is the area bounded by Pocifie C co Highway, CekW nwwt Str*t and Lake 5trest j (A r records show ti ia:' your mq)any o n W wells In this part of ftra City, and we would very mua't appreciate your pr+ dl l the questions an ttre enclawd sheet. Yaj can kest chocte off your answers on to sislMriqut it In fhsr ancleaml onvrelape ark drop it in a rrroilbo& y O lWm other comments or :der* about the powdblllty of a wnterfkcd prograrn in the gw�nlpt, or if rw have any gw0lans about the City% study,'C36;m efool free to write the or s it oul Mike hUtarl of our staff of O Thw* Y&j WY murk for your help, �ir�lalrrerlir, , i Pam Obvici W or S►trVices 47 I{ Yttl '�,11�'�y�.rrr Nwwr�.www.�.....s��.r..�awr........... . .,. �r...ww....��.. . . ........ ..... F, , BEACH CITY OF HUNTING io P.C. BOX 190 D&AXTWWCWoML=WNTSfiRVWW CAL ORNIA O" MN�,pMNO 01 U W0lr f 41 M�11 I'��1MMi111M�ti1V1�1aM�7t�!�L�371 Dwon A,.n lac ao in vrbaan arom Is the itrp pressure forty dew.lq,prrrant or+R :.�e Oil pia . — � camnercial structures =* built now active ail ^ff creas, fn*n which now **11s could be drilled and new tichrr kW 10im fo + ammod over. This pmarurae for new devalopment an ail flolds Is wNf irs City of aluri ington IDeaah, aid the Cit Is co1►ommml that v�d W on hrvas waf be lost In ttm futu�ro.If dil flald� t. vormiote, .I t+ rse, is Plea bg DlvWan Is studa►Ing this pctantlal p vMom. As part *f this study, we CrtV'wiil1 if a unit ad m and waterflo is paiWble In tha Townlat a.M t�, � P Cltye (T.Iris k the area bowiW by ReIfie Caast H MOM A Wde w ea! Ur acid Lc" StnWj Cur rawnh Om thof �� a U or Ile #+r t#ri� t the Cit d we would �� y,. very mmh Wreclate Yom t am in the eaclosal sheet. You ran ju* chuck oft your anew an i';;;#,t put I in tip �rrrblased en pa4e &W drop 11 In a rmilbm k 1 Ililret wis..arWm abort the possibility of a waterflaxd pMr rr In the It hav*o'1,f'.quMias about fhe CII)Os study ease feel free to *T' itel Ww Y 60'cW A" Multai of eur staff at M"". y o vw yr mmh (W yo m help, ar of SwAces, 111011 ON 1' 47 io ICI � ,, `� '.� � • APPENOW 6 1 sibl ri . knpwt Prognm fay Ow City of f-i mtington N" Huntington Bach U.So Office of Twhnolagy Aer naw,it, DPO, lard +si tUs RAarwas Huntkvton Both," CaNfornia Railroad I,1 ML CA r1od M . of gMtIw* Vol. 44g i I• tors S eoah 09 P'mw Did neeid Portion," DOl36 sunrnntrY of alg /�tuns. Vol. 280 + •�YYIIMI� � 1 doh 01 1U1d . &w0wa:t Exb orlon of Townlat A:+ ag" DC)t3, SimmwY.of i Oft Devel9gMt F. L. HUl (!~dltur� MG OW �s In MwAi�t m h OldFlwldw.M Cam, S, „not.,.,fir,at C antiona, Vol. fto *wffwets in tt Tat Swift in tha Townitet A*a, hiantington ftazh," Divi 1w. .f„ ': r of Iloaratl Vol. 359 •1949. to AN" W Rmkt n iGore Bnth C i=iald," DOG, umM Y of j 'j`,` w■� ' •pit: 1 I ON1't fonts Bwrd V Kqe Nzatlw%"IM { 1 , I • 49 e. / {y�,. "�k!t'!. ,,�^Y.'.'',�Nk��rrw` '�4"��x�� 'r�.� �;�}., a �,�� ,� ,. ��.� .A.�'•��„ry'+'+4�,�d•� aim J. "' '..rr.r.rr.r.��. .. w.r.�+r--r+•....r.wr..�r.�...+..�.r.�,w '::• lot r • f ( pr r WAmw wA -Aadw on md Cal fib'!�•'hi��,i; � A: � Wad 1 YY' 1 f a ''. �•1 �i •' 1 �. ' tOA �40-.A 96GNAW 1�!•i#�Mil ww IN O r+ +, OW ff" ! N I�, ;•.'�'''''' <, DrD 'h� T r . ,, 1 r, •,,1. 41k,�•'If Ili rN,.'�''�rp y ,i ; M"`, •• s r ', M1+1• ` 1�• My,�e,YF i I � 4 • a , +row 104, 00 KmtkVton Bea�h Erwgy Series 1 • .j Its �'.r'', �1 • 1 ,9: ;i '� I kcal- hvact of Op* Operatio.M.8 In HuntkUon Newatch Y , fj 44 Beach t. i 1.�•(,v!.. • �%1� `, r1 � i�,�.�,1�i •SIP i' •� ,•. �i � I 7�./ J 4 y5}M 4 w of venen t errnc N i , r A • Marck 198 1 yW� 7iP '�I L Alt, YF IV \�'A t. 'N •�! T C„ v 7 e v dtio e . t • '� �tr 4r r,s•, d � ' ., ��' ., "'; n'}' y.'•'4 • ' Yrl �' ,-` 4 1 •�'(r •(�t 1�'` r'Y.'r,� r k A � .. .r'r ; "� �,�� J.. �r , ' _ �1 V r �� a '�,'l {. C�6.'�1 •,•"/, rya•' ■,••, �r., r ' a�U r f� Y �� r'r•rw ",�/ a� ��/ f 7 it �k,� °� �fr dlrr� '.r `'+„ t 1. � !• ' Ir �� 41 � ' ,�..' 4l, i`. � a�lFi Ak r� 1,•;' �rN'r, .o :.:p 1 IAI�M, ' 1 + .�: p r ,�• +��/ :� 7�3'�',C%�'' ��'T.l ;�jt(1��1t.M1r�,♦ill ! ,(, �� tit'�•,.'1�•. �" ''!r i, y' ;� .. ., '"+`�''�+lr�i•' ' '� r.� " Jib•[ -. ' w'.. •• , of t Y � �fj� , . ,ar,• �I J- •, r • r! Iwo "PI�'1b�1k> � r Y +b, � �} r P �r :Ilf i'` I�;ya' a i� � a•, , � . w � •MM''yJ�>♦Lii�.W�'„ SY►1 (7� •k�ili'r ,:J�74��r.�Y ,'�.r:Y�1}..i...��rt..>{i♦a2'!.__Ja.r� y.l_ _ � • ` 1 _ � • '. • �� y ti A r T 4; P } t r *�� +!q�"' a J CIA w �l !Y+M, `i rJ116, ' > �� '..Y ��'1 �� ..,� •fir ,�� ! y 4 �'� A� !� �h •L,hw',ro, ;,: , . r4 d. w 16 a ,+fin •��}`�'` �'�• •.t} ', ,�,�./t^.., Oil „1 ANGTON MACH ORGY SERIES hr •�,r �/` ,,, :•,,,fir' , • impA CM or. oL opEFtATioNs HL*frN`y1,�'IN CN BEACH sErRvica �. r h r yR�i! " •�r� •vill L;'' � r 1 , n M• r K .Jf ai14, r e TABLE OF CONTENTS r PAGE �I F' 1 1 za +�'�b�• i ��,iti„ j 'AW:I'S AN E NDITUR ATt- r� RATIONS IN WUNTIICTON BEACH S a a ` + 12 3oO n$CAI. IMPACTS OF CONTINLOINW OIL OPERATIONS 13 j 3.1 IN t"atins Futum 00 Opwatiom 13 � 1• 12 N��p obm*VarioWos Affactlno " fr o R d E*a�nditurn 14 ti ► ow of era 15 19 .I TownWtOwwoomi Aroma 20 ��e y ,;.. 44 V 25 1Vd� Cats IMPACTS 25 �V '►-fbl BerIr�lfs 26 I a of d Lmf Pompsclives an Ncnwfi*col costs and Bowits 26 U CONCLUSION 27 r, As City E Ifwo moms 29 IN Bowsaw from Other Enwgy Facilities 35 39 ' 1 , Y 40 t h ' top s 1111N. Foreword r In a Brim of db4uWon s a'1 wmpy-relatod i pralwa by the e!1'1 of the City. of Hurrtlnlptan� Huf7tington � Ie a aDentas>f for many ties I ludi a e and t(f*W* anii pfeAssNIM, an rtw p1arN, i y, �a#ar ycdon todmal e& The to nc�r � hasip city . �+19v e1 tho WPM =bfo � of so t F wf1Na of the Barrio thn mitipting at much aa� yy aadvarm sty that amh aativitim ra'nlot troy, tither rorarte in fhle wrier i lrt iurrr�nq "am Ate► to UnderWwW Coil Rua rves In Dwnelgwd / + 11 CMfinpwoey Plaming In Huntlnp m ftach ar, aratf O11 R ecowrry Toaclvalogy es War and C+o uwv+otian Paliaim at the Lawl Lml x. r Thk PWMID MaaU w aed with find d mWitorom from the V.S. Office of Caoutal Zeno IIA W49Werr Irldtiata d 000Mia and AtmaorphaeariaC Aad►Wnistraartion, urt&r the pr+oASIOns of the F+rsl" Cac utal Zone Mo'b4pfTwe"M Act of i 972, as ernarrryled, trod from the Cal Coastal Carimit cn uvk t the g;roavtrlerru of fw Coastal Act of 1976. 1 ..» . ' :ail.;' • Definitions :. This roport rworawily dlarcusaa same techr►ic:al oaPoatas of the oil inAistry and of fiscal t WWYA. Caarweiwntly, some te"M we used which may not be familiar to the reader. Tt O following definitiaaw seatian wow propored to help clarify the meaning of some of these Rya retr , a:al1 warrdr cwfirrsd in this section we italictted the first time they ih the kpo�rt`�. J 1kowyorgi Any praduacttan method whtarh 6 used to reacoArr nw a oil from a p rewwIr thm a *Wd be obtained by natural r ewrvo& one W or simple pumping, I+ rs wait► f lod, st"m flood and oftr Wlwt*m trrwfvft bletttan of f tuids buo the ro#a1orl* 0 voeo wr @Mttonal all. fto J!!a►ri" agent by the City to pr v(div goods wW srvtaws to the landow wart r�wwlsbft war we ard vidtara of the Myo A Oft report rofws to revenues rocwtwed grid oVendttwos kwsvred by Vw of pabttoww land us" or activities 000urrt v to !iunttnpton New& st M rwvemes rema k ft and evartlatble to the City after totol oxpo w0turos apt twl rev~& Costa associatedwith dw adnp a W option "W other asp when tW dot" I t 60rMtif"S, ft ntoft that OW000 bwwj its that might hm aw"ted f w" Ow . prrrei d 41"? awttws aaar•e last. ,!Lftt(vis ft th *Iwn up throo wells by natural preaws e f as ration a* bar p 1OXIMt Aqera ttnp water nr other f Uds to help fwcr tlar oQ to the sw f apart. MMSt h their oantext, rf re to than redevelopment *f the aaatary'aco woo of an oar f teld for "a vuav or arrreree. aq woes or Rome the City r+ea.etvm saarooa i wbxlo U=sM fOost ivnb dW l!t tide r operto "Iva to a net Of evaa; U or a+andtt wo possible to the f htw*; a fubwe prWaraw of fWw(nV a "urtW; a unft ft at OUtty doMpood of Sa veal ad OW v0dah ww* as awe men oil proof th Vrft to 040 ***met t and wlt mufti lowesu to pRWkw do t +oa* as a stale party. When tiara 69or4arts trt the post we frWmented, ,attar No taWtlfaad for the use of Mae en1wwwd r000vory 0e066 which on best be applied an a door+ Abawr iron-a+oa�tparttttwr ba d#. An w*anoaed raecovwy pro .- m thraWh whtah water is bg4ttad btto a rear waoir in to aim story oA from go paves In the rock. , ticn: AnuVw term far mwaWf xm,+od''. 2 F i i ' r "fir/.�•P � „��'. r4 Ir�:rr;1 Y r i 14, 41 t; ` i �� N "fo-rojewo fullltless occupy in r tb4o" in rim-4 Ow City qn fla"O law wo In thin City of f ele low norrling kimd # untingr p r, .ay in end roar use a the A M Ow fib oorrttn jw to be ;� # tAM n*AO fW111ti" hMlu60 *led aid P w m 1rroa m to � we1� eW h ell production p to of #0 "Old aw to r rr�A+ot1 tlw rirritla a ter wgasignq toerrninslr asWam FbW tnnpooa are P,awvw P1446 Poems .aw adea trialty nerd fattom in "mnlni Oe but we of the netwW go d butlarn eyste nw. All of knd and ** Ctty's polity ftward Cantintree thm have tboa W*au in on the Oily. on ""tie*. rOrr to tir °tm clfyral at her rn,c w rrrww flow the tetra Ow the facliitill--fhr power of Cw low r MIAO - . w � ��' +� a refit of irwf+�arr� prti�eilr ,epe�lltl ■t i the Pwrl UW►t faillities whit#+ wi'ti osrrtirr m to g�rr+rr'+htlll ter City thmush MNO ""Ond OW * tntwwt& ' fifty r lr xm OW exemplar,. +eallarrt we not N1ari'y 10 SIONflowdly term WIN end erroeura 11 or dieea n►a" mdfmw teas) Pw too end w on wpara"t"Fw of tl+r $ ffaagtk& Thus, in tio Citry we the da not t sIgnifl Lard we, tiptleO4 MINW. by �+ 1 y 0 Om to the Lei "Moos11 it tr two*. (fir •xMnnpcte. ' Me SW Os " ia sh*/ ha bean mm1W awt k) anjunattan w;th tha chr oWop wtl of e Thr p0w1pd pra'pm of thls stu*j is to city-wicia wrnputer MO&I whiwr ame►aw "tknmu ttlar ffrwd M 4m* at the fiacM kopaets of v&rkm knd woe., �rrq� f�1i�e �peei•!!!r of ort �11� C1!� Mtn '! t dm got f eus" err► as " @Kean b y take briomaKat cort+aln pWollwItIm of 00"W • ws of vwy vetusbis tend off crwatiarns. �... IVA T' +1 .�rff 000*eY, OU rev~* we snore s l"sly Sa tion 30 pmJeats the flsarl knpetts of reloW to Its armunt of ob produwd by amthulev 016 etperstlarr tlhrogt 1 thr wells than the m r"ge they omupy. u-Kbr foe diffirmt owr 1m, %whd The City*wldv model, tovi evwr, Is hw9ely attention it 21"W1 to WmW en dtrvoh*W am., wo Vwwwally Ovwnewon and fleid/ (W6nweot rrom da+ae W Wow agar 4 revrnM to wham the etetne of all eporaJww Is I11►1y 04nqlrq pia;tlort 1evW& Thus, a bettw to ahangs, my of O wnputinq 06 Impatts of oo r slant hu been dovelaWd so pwt of >rkwlly, Sftticn 460 d1oa+ m News beeldw thin mdy* ( AppwWk A), f l Mttpo+a r wh1oh am $to Yvvm ?4r ` we" dwiriam •bo*- lwW woo In t1w Owtim db,► the Cityr td Out ojqwdkuru relwtad tw +oll 1 In Htatin Wn Buu+woh for fiscal ,. , r ' Y • 1 (. 1 i 2.0 Current City Revenues and Expenditures in Huntington Beach Related to Oil Operations � ' Tabla 2.1 anlnraclxes the ra%wwas and IM-10. Oil wtiviti generated not e rxlitum 4t 1butablo to oil production ri mues (re yemies OX costs) of In Kntinpion Search for fiscal year gVroximotely $00,000 for the year. j TASLE 2.1 Citr Revown and EmEEWItufas Related to Oil Operations of Flowl Yew R � M�wc y $ 302060 a rr�mant and 0?1 roWLsction axed Adrninistration S203,340 bus ma Licerm f=wi I,076j"6 Publi: Works 13. ,46x Raysitiw end Kawnents 120j000 Pollee Departfrent �an ran 73t= Directly Asaignc61e 14t36o urr rratsr Pffmits VIM Not Directly A,eslgr►+ a 150j903 C rNB a ilC'ng Flm Duel rtment P 6, b Directly Assignable 290 P"fw lrrarrc ail Iropeciol 450000 • Spemol Equipment TOTAL RE NM &W Personrol 2100000 Not Directly A*W s J8I d TOTAL EXPENDITLIRES $ 8700M $196M477(Told Revoom)- $0%933 (Tat+arl E4enditurae) & t$801#404 04st RWw%N)* }':. , fte(W to jw*ian 12 and L3 far 0,tumian aid eeowation,of thrso flown, i ! f , i - �arec�.w+�. +► wr�.rrr.�.rw.r.rw.w�rw.� The jollowirg arc ions explain how these expenditures ,snd revonue+i were astimested. TABLE: 2.7 2.1 Expend twms DistrUxition of Fire Npartment Calle by Y e 3f Lnnd Calendar Year , . Local govrrnments provide a wide range of vital public goods and services. In 1979-.80, Type of for example, the City of Huntirgton Beach Lmd Use 0 of Cal % of Tote,,' spent over $30 million to provide businesses, indgntry, residents and visitors Residential 20937 34.5 of Huntington Beach with fire and polie-i protoction., streets, sRweers, garbage Streets & Highways 537 6.3 dIaVc*al, animal ventrr ., building Inspections, consumer pro, -ctian, and Zndustriai 269 3.2 m y other ImportrAnt see ices. This section d!vcuersexs the Clty's expenditures City Beach do Pier 257 3.0 related to oil operetiorrn. CorrrmWeloi 21140 2.8 Direct! Aal able 15x gn:,turtsi A key problem in this kind of f4eal analysis is Oil 5; .6 determining what portion of the total City budget "uld be sttr"vted to differrent city Perks 126 1.5 land uaeei. In only a few Mesas Is it relatively any to rnesaunr the amouert of Miscellaneous 520 61 publl: servicars pmvldbd directly us tsi'tain kirrds of lad uses. The prlrelpai examples Other of thssrr divactly esealgneable coats we those tlrreraigrrerd (7) .j M 42.0 j related to police and fits calls. The City keeps mcords of the number of such eaills TOTALS 80525 100.0 saki also noteeto, among other data, the land users located on the site of each 0011. We than mumes that tl`w 'proportion of calls generated bey osch land we category is a reasonable estimste of the praportior? of the City°e costs in ,voponding to all calls (1) Include@ all fire, er> wgency/ medics that should be attributed to each land use aesrstane.e, and non-fire an Or. non-wnv. gency/medleel incidents. Table 2.2 shows this distribution of Fire (2) T:�e am emsrgeney/medics! Derperbhant calls by 1MW we types. It Incident* that could not be rerignad t Indicates that only .6 petoont of all final a particular land use. woo related to d8 operotlon& The total City expendltureo can the budget Items Sourms Cky of Huntington Beach Fire rclotead to Fire Department ernorgency Department end Piaetiriing Staff. calls were $4,718,249 in 1979. Thews items we Fine Control �auf t number 302)w awl Iafias: Aid Asromadie (W. neides Ing the, dlaa+uaston above, oil user „M tten sftuld be migned A pa cent of the Par.anthools indicestes the account tell, ear 326,3m. rwnrbees In the City budget for thanes ttarrns. S �w .Table *7.3 shows the distribution of Police The following budget items were Department calls among land uses in the considered related to the coats of City. Note that coil operatima are not responds. to criminal activity: Crime broken our Into a separate category; they Analysis7330), Vice and Cr anized Crime are lirluded in the "industrial" group. All (326), Invesligative (329�, Scientific industri+ss accounted for only .2 percent of Inveestigatiam (331)9 Patrol (332), Traffic polices calla. Because there are other (335) aid Aero (337). The City expended Industries in Huntington Beach besides olt, $7,190,105 to provide these services In the shara or the eVense of these services 1979-90. Oil's share, .2 percent of the attributed to oil facilities must be some total, la t 14,360. fraction of .2 percent. For the purposes of this analysis, however, the full .2 percent A very large proportion of fire aW police It assigned to oil activities to ensure teat calls are Included under "streets rM their share Is not undercoat imated. highways," I'miscellerwtous" or "unassigned" categories. Expenditure in these TABLE 2.3 categories carrot be amigned to specific land uses directly. This is try.* for most Distributinn of Polio i mortment other City expenditures cc well. These will Calls bi Rmot Lanaa Tandar bra discussed again belrw. " ear Another group of City expenditures which 0 of Calls % of 7� can ba reasonably assumed to be directly rotated to oil operations are the casts of Ste*tits & Highways 29,386 40.2 the City's all inspection and regulatlan activities. Ths City Oil Inspector, who Rsni dent Ial 239917 32.7 works In the Fire Department, enforces the City Oil Code, Inspects every well ' Commercial 130457 18.4 annually, reaponds to all-related j emergencies and performs other duties � City Backe.. & Pier 908 1.2 related to all operati The Fire: aerportmw* estimates than oil Inspection City parks 446 .5 costs (including inspector's salary and over" me, bwaf itso Carl uniforms and Stater Beach 129 .3 office support) were approximately $45,8W In 1979-80. Industrial 125 112 (ldclurding oW Flnally, 'becwsee there Is a potential petroleum fire hazard aasaciateei with the Miacrellonsous 4i71� .3 oil production facilities, pipelines and tank farms in Huntington Beach, the Firer TOTALS 73,085 10M Department has an euwVira company that Is specially trained and equipped to handle oil fires. If not for its oil field responsibility, the Fires Department would not maintain this oarnpany. 'Therefore, the cost of this Sources City a! Krraington Beach Police protection, estimated at $210,000 for IDepartmernt sad Punning Staff. 1979-80, is to City expenditures on oil activities. r y... . Not . 04rer_t_l�.._�Assigmble Ex iditurts! TA13LE 7.4 as t erYperndi t urges oomotdirectly ti e assiryned to pa•ticular land uses. Many of DlstrN)tlon of Costs th+Ae represent the C it is "werheoe' c•r Us ram_e , e verop Model the cosT of having services avai loble, �, of Tote) should the be needed. F-conornlst Cee Wgt Patterson helps Y cicirif this points 5xpenditures % of Ax-reagt Assigned by ". .the hal+ic purpose of a fire in City Model department is p roterc Lion, wh!ch is available to all wheythw or not they Residarntlal 659E 87.3% actually hove a fire. it Is not logical to assume That a fire deepartrne:n j Is Cornmerc.'al Q� S.29i6 gold only when It Is flghtinr+ a f Ire." industrial 696 7.340 Thus, while oWenditurers an f fighting f fires can be reasonably W. ibuted to different Oil 3% 2.3% uws, the meets of haviny the equipment and pert ommi ready to fight any fire are Vacant 7% 2 9% not, but are borne by all members of the community. Total i00% 100.D% The City has developed an expenditure model a: part of the preparotion of this report for estimating the "fair share's of three casts that can be reasonably In 1979-BDO expenditures an budget Items attributed to different kinds of land wes. which cwmt be directly traced to spr,.ific A detailed discumfon of :hls model and of la)d us" totaled t24r982,308.* Oil's 0wre alternatives that were examlrwd by the ' of this 2.3 peroent, equals $572,S23. City for this study Is Included in Appendix Table IS lists all the budget Items A. A brief surnma•y of.the nwWol vW its included in this analysis. assumptions follows: • 2.2 Reve mms model t+aket into memint *ewal factors in assigning the appropriate share Oil Vwatlorki geererate significant of City expenditures to different lmd uses, rervenueis for this City from a number of llpa)L ding the arrorrnt of aKcreuges in the sources, including tt Mellowing: City each local use type occupies and the intenslty of urns an that a nmoe (that Is, the number of residences, hwinesses or oil facilities ,-mr vcre). The assumption " Library, Parks & Recreatiarv, and utilised In the model Is that more M* bons and 8earctm are. not Included kdenrsively dwel*W area Mend to r*Wre In the analysis becouse these three e ass (OW thus, more groups of services are ottributsd epwwwUltum) per vcm then lea dosely primwily to resldentlal uses ard are dwelapscl area. TN* approach, called the not carsiderad in the calculations of et Aver y Modef"s qnUrqt4wexperrrditums, attributable to oil fea lens c�rr .aceoun r t 1 apemttane. Water Department pare" of thrr aty% b X190 (far iterAs iturer< and rever expow s from watw wlrlalr aa.vwt be dlree pec tiy tromd to sific am also erxclvded, bwa me oil lewd um)o SW Table 2wpr activitia awomw relatively stroll q W*Ities of Wow arrd t40 erstirnated revewas are not IrvorU rt a !Isis analysis. g • 3 *Dq OerL'leRt _ use=, VAR Cmw COMMLI 9234) Opwalepuat Services Adm. t3'A6) Aftinimtruticm VMS IfllliM"'1 i231 Cbsraeot Pltmmiag, (321) Genera 1 support saw lt�t dlw (232) boa Planning (322) Parsoe"l City Admisfatx son 12331 Land Use (323) Public Af&'afre Zubmsai Rs#"t (234) Plan ftw*kv (324) R*cerds EMI at and Reeesaft (323) ?raining C - -pert 026) IL/search CUM lablie lrjese*tiaa Public works (3331 Communication � CMa t�e+2apoes* fus) Cf*31 D*lsasat (410) Aftia3strat.?on laze REOrtnent • (U4) Data (412) 3srvey"q (1271 serdke ins (41s) ;;:tric ugineering #M) idhaiaistration !IM Causal stele m 1420) lS dubm €me AdiinistraEtiou ;301) fire trwrention Q"I Owd Ps908ss109 M-G) %&abani,:ml maintenaeroe (304; Joint Potmrs IMI (4621 V"Icl* Reppair (413) Pare Station 11M sink 1r� rent (340) sorer ma tntename U22) Amad Lea 1562) (SVII sewn Pump station (130) City Rttae--4&7 (431) Mechanical Tabricztion * . iPw cc 11") Clty Mack (4331 Pool Car Raiutecance buead Oo `s�oeb a� 1141) alk4m4osm (4'53) Ppeclal Repasts . 1?fs) lsearemmel (450� ! IftwMalowmAs and (I?!) liaaerrw a i0 V "UmadgmAnmar 1e: � (1111 Am mo m 3.2 and 2.3. wrl:.ag 41U. I1T211F wa l ws LiCs 4m` ieilel" Maintenance 4090 41D1 S for 13't!-e4 mass M4 rim Gazee�al GoL•arem�eut $6,1iE1.lD� Public works S.OsI,Ti� E Prlio! �.SaQ.9l0 � - rire Total Aft TAMX ZZ '° hw ion oemb plamingdivision � M .mink r ' l) property taxes (including lax on surface of an oil field or oil percel is considered in creeos, r;Inerol rights rnd improvements), ?.) use for oil produclion, and haw much could business license and oii production license reasonably be considered v . :ant a^A fees, 3) inspection foes, 4) pipeline availoble for other uses. In many cases, a frane:hises, 5) wastewater permit fees, 6) parcel Is so densely populated with wells drilling/redrilling permy f re. and 7) and tanks that the entire crea can be royalti% ,end easements. considered oil production land. in other instances, however, open spaces between Pm ..ertZ Tax: The Cityas property tax wells ores large enough to permit revenuea tyre primarily dependent an three developme:n4 of other uses. For example, key variables, l) the assessment or it would be unreasonable to think of a valuation of property in the City, 2) the ten-acre ;sarcel with three oil wells on it as tax rate applied to these valuations Dr devoted entirely to oil. Vacant portions of assessments, and 3) the percentage of the r,uch a parcel could be developed for other total property taxes collected in uses. This has happened in areas Huntington Beath which actually go to the throughout the City. City. In order to accurately estimate the surface ProposlVon 13 "rolled-bock" property area of the City used for oil activities, the vtaluaticme to 1975 levels and limits characteristics of the oil fields and parcels re-assaament to two percent per year. In the City worts anolyzed to determine if Hov►eveert if a or.,party is sold, It is the land around the welds and tanks could re-ariassesd at that tirne at its selling be developed for other uses. Those crests price. Genera;iy, betouse of the two which could be c omidered available for perc,vorrt annual limit, valuations do not other uses were counted as vawant land. keep pace with Inflation. Tim frequency at The remaining portions of oil fields and which properties "turn-over" (are sold), and parcels were counted as oil areas. Through Thus are re-assessed, greatly affects how this proem, staff estimated that about closely thn overall voluallon for properties 472 acres are actually used for oil can keep pace with inflation 4 production in Huntington PA=h. The estimated assessed value of this surface Proposition 13 generally limits property CJreco for i 979-80 is $4,901,666 (See Table: tax rates to cne percent of market value. 2.6). Voters in any tax mate aresu can approve additional taxes beyond this base rate, t'3es:des then surface fond, property taxes Table 2.6 below shows the disiribuVon of are also assessed can mine:real rights, secured 011 holdings among tox rate areas, the rates imefovernents, and vuecured for each area osnd the tax collw.te;d by the improvements. The assessments c,n wch of County. these It. 1979-80 were the foliowing% $23,78E,080 for mineral rights; $9 227480 Many jurisdictions other than the City for secured improvements; and J70:160 (sum as the scho6i districts) are ad34 for unsecured Improvements. fwwW by property taxes. Thus, only r, fraction of the total property taxes The City receives a 20.7 pert shares of collected in Nuntingtoin Beach ecteuolly goo the total property tuxes on oil oaWatiaus to the City, The shares of the: p;,,ftpetrty in Huntington peach collected by the toxess which went, te:� the City was 20.7 County which amounted to $3820068 for parent in 1975-80. 197940 The mart diffla;it pmablern In esstireating Owem License and oil Prvtluo:tion Wk the CIt property tax reeverkm Wateed to a eFees: The oil production oleo IS a off is daterrfining how much surface area Me" earq for ooc;h barrel of oil produced. it Is ifnkad to the 14 �49 F i u!dUv of On En Hwidrult ors EaseN 2979-M Teat Rib! "n" I Secuewd d. UMMd Tax Tax Am Laid+ Rl#ft kMnmments Total Rote Collected ou 49= W,d33,010 .,+974v28G 4379970 Y4340v927 4.7767% 1,640!363 W7 13J42 66AU ls%D 2Q7 2899732 4.8349% 13,997 GlA 47,53 2269350 137270 9,450 298,123 4.026% 149437 M3 & 014 595P4 2gWv030 23791M 269380 3A89#604 4..7984% 176,673 Tateb 4sVU19666 23,78SPO 99227 ASO 70 J4160 38,618,386 I,645l740 + t.wd surface wag diearIbe:ted anwm tax rato woes In the same propartlans as m»ere! ruts. - 5ouroe: CrwW County Aneww% Office. AIN& TAELE L6 r hwfroon be plon ing diviston 4 I f , 1 , cans:.rner price index, and, thus, increases f%ome pi,"Ilnes are not related to oil as the cost of living The oil prcchmtion i&re - that is, even if there production license fee rotes for 1979-60 were no oii production in Huntington Seoch, were 11.050/barrel for "non-stripper" wells these pipelines would c : itirwe to be used. (wells that pruduce more tftan ten barrels Thofy -re used for transporting crude oil per ) aid 9,84�/bairn) for "stripper" dleli-mred by hanker or for currying gas or wells (welis that prockme less than 10 refined product.,) barrels per duy). Ench oil operator also F pays ai arwwal $ ICK) busirwss license fee Ho oltios and Easernentsi As a resul+ of per well. legislation In t Ts,the City receives royalty payments. from the sale of oil The oil production Me Is paid quarterly, ewoduced di offshore 1pose public and the aerator'may deduct up to $25 per Resources Coda 392. The royalty is quartet as reimbursement for the license approximately .25 percent of those sales, fee. In other words, the first $25 of the and therefore, contingent on oii prices and quarterly oil production fee Is paid in the amount produced - two variables V!ot advance, In the form of a business licence ore very difficult to edict. in 1979-80, fee. The total revenue collected this the Clt received F20,000 from this source was $1 o0760996 for 19794f source.I Oil Well Ire,Mtlon Feet Each oil well Is 2.3 Conclusion inspectedannually for compliart►ce with the Huntington Beach Oil Cade. The oil The analysis for 1979-00 Indicates that oii Inspector must approve oath well before a production contributes significant revenues business I1cv= is Issued. There, Is a $SO to the City, totaling aapproxlrnately $1.67 inspection "as per well. Total revenue million. Approximately two-thirds of these from oil well inspections was $73,000 for revenues come from the oil production fee 1979-00. (per barrel) which Is tied directly to produclion. This fto also incraases Wastewater permits: Every well that uses annually with an !index of the Inflation PJD wasiewa er system must pay an gate= thus, this revenuesource con keep wastewater fee. There are 322 poet to a significant degree with rising w elit using the system Total revenues expenditure levels. were $9,6 0 for 1979-W. The estimated City expenditures related to 2111111 edrllli_ng__ Permitm In order to oil prod -etion for 1979.80 were Will or r an o well, are aerator must oWoxin:otely $.87 million. Three secure a permit from the oil lropector. depwitments—fire, pollce and public Them is a $5(10 fee for each permit works*-account 'for about two-thirds of apprcy . In 1979-80, 13 driIling/redrilling thesef esanditures by al other permits were rued, generating a revenue departments combined for the remaining of $dt5M. one third of the total. P11 1111ne Froxhisey ail amptaniee 'that Clearly, oil production activities currently pipelines 5- uhtington Beach pay generate not ireverxrss to the City. The franchise taxes whdsr rotes are establiOred next sxtian analyses how this fiscal by cantraats with ,the City. The term of situation rnl[01 dxrge !n the future, this connects very from franchise to considering va riablos such as oNming franchim Riwraw from this axwoe were production lev+sls, inflatran, aced pressures f tor 1117%.0 for o a production p ini lrh�ltgton tor�ediwlop the oil fields to new ton. Mate$22 i IMY. MMA91�v.MMlwkw.n.s!. .r►.r ti Mv1.w.wwwwlwone�kw�w.MnennwFRwMre�hn.n n•.•r + T a 'r '• 3 ' 4 i 3. Fiscal Impacts of Continuing 01 Operations S. Estimates of ft fiscal impacts of In light of these rAong!ng variables and ; ooptinued og oetivltlss In Huntington different possibilities$ several "scasnorlos" Beach dopand largely on the predicted of oil operations over the next decade have future of the ectivitiaa• This con be a been analyzed. '-he first assumes, overall, pwoblem bade mer►-y variables important that the number of wellh acreage end to a fbeW anslynis, such as the number of prod tlan level remain relatively * baels produaedN the nw'nbar of wells, the unchemgmd. This could come about If the actwi amwgr devoted to all facilities and dsclirw of production in some parts of thn the inflation retef we difficult to foresee. field are balanced by new watorflood • eovw � � l'�i er�tio projects and � i�,aductla other nam�an � small M tlna . NR, g p g Independents Is assumed to continue The lack of avebble open spas in this dropping, but this "recyell,n' of thalr wee and thr gr&Mnq housing e"rortage parcels to now &ass would proved very presaura to abandon'all fields and to slowly, largely this to the Increasing price rodrw lop them tar houakwoo At the swm of oll. Th a, the number of wells, acreage, Omp rl al priory wW the rMaxation of and overall oil prodwtiun would rarnain V .r+; �wrlluer 4WWr* an d0lnWjD cll eke relatively cor'Mtant for the next tan years• wdwh even at low ' l V attt�rativa. Haar . rriNrki n ryrrdw s, 1 to +igus�r rh ae ywrster� a Two other ropor•ts In this serin are fir; 'p fits r to parh of the field highly relevant to the disdaeiorr of ` ► irilydt •tat Vat boo: applied. rww I trrolxxslogie$t ftep�rt MX ` ' , wlr pror ra err Ms R!w 40teevving Wass Amon to men daali , t rOround On itaaarr�es In 1►.;',. t � h Develcp d Araw"r wW Arpwt 0�49 '` Iti Mlr =o " iced 02 MewvWy Tralxy I00s s r 13. r ' n ti, 1 . 1 I The second scenario envixicx•rs a grodkial UMergrourrd (ail Re�wr%tes in Developed phase-out of oil operations in the. Townlot Arecus," analyzes this pwilbility in cietall, and Downtown during the 19Ws, bolt operations elsewhere in the City continue Before discussing each of ilt*see ascemdr•los, relatively uncharged. This was arxrlyzed erne wsurnpflons about how revenues tine be*wse the Townlot and Downtrwm areas expenditures will charge over time should are espercieally valuable parts of the City; be rzviewed. and pressures for redevelopment there will be stronger than elsewhere. Alsr. , with the 12 Assurn tuns about Variables nffectirm completion of the Loral Cocstal Plan Future Revenues and EIMM-ures during the early part of the decnd', now dormant efforts to develop and redevelop Several txsumptions about some key that area should Inte roily. variables affecting future revenues and expenditures have been made in this The third scenario sees a phase out of the a�r'ralysis. small-scale independent operaticrnss during the next decade, while the major oil First of all, Propeltion 13's limits on the companies continue operating near their property tax rate and property value present levels. In many ways, this scenario anerssment are nssurned to remain in may best opprox1 hate what will actually effect. We also assume that most oil happen. Discusssons with the mayor oil properties that remain productive w111 not companies in Huntington Beach indicate change owners, thus limiting re-assessment that they expect to continuo operating at of the surface areas to annual increases of least another 20 years, and that the two percent per year. (Sae Sect.on 2-30 appiieation of eenha -eed recovery above.) The C1ty's share of overall tecfrnologles many not drernaticilly increase property tax revenues collected in production, but will offset recent declines Huntington Beach was essumed to remcln and keep production levels up for several approximately 20.7 percent. years. At the *arrow tirnee, the production of the irrdepeendents has continued to decline. Changes In the amounts charged for Generally speaking, they cannot apply the candling, inspection and waste water er+hanc rmZvery technologies mailable pexmita were not incorporated Into the to the larger companies. As their analysts because these fees omwint for production drop arid the rnalue of the only a small peerceentage of total annual surface for housingy continues to rise, these revenues. ptsrceels would grexlually recycle. On the expenditure side, the costs to the The least scenario cearwider s the poWbility City for providing services to futuv oil : that, rather than -ebarrdoninrrgg their operations will be a function of how much operatlarrs, the ssmal`. tndependerd oil of the land resmairrs in oil production, the ccrrrpanierys in the Tmmlot, along with arse number of ,ells nerd related fociPtiees to be or mars of the majong. join fogesrtNw and served, the level of service to be provided, fort a "unit" By cbeMbining the reseseeureu aW the inflation rate. In the following � of all the partle 1pantss, ft ex unit heas the arreslysis, the level of srervlce is assumed to � c apitssl c6.j the surfaceearerago to apply remain ;:onstant; owwoqueMly, total City ,waterff oW and other •nl'x'erreesd recovery eexpenditurers are anurned to Increaser techrri". Thus, oroductie m Ine:reme s and according to the inflation note and tier oopeseratiorrs' eadinuesr throughout the City's tserarall growth pattarn. In the I Repwt allI In this dories, following analysis, total City expenditum VrsewrviM Reece Access tea em the next ton years were projected ld I� r AMP us!hq five City-wide Fis=I impnct Model Weigh:ed Average Model's exl�enditure 11m; nrid the Citys General P4anr whlcfi helps as our hest estimate of whn4 Cit>- • define the future growth patte-rn ani mlx expenditures will mtmily t*, and th': of uses in the City, Tt+ese total annual City-wide Mixlel's c'.Venditure ;ioa at an expatxl:4ure estimates were used to estirnaie of they probable: moxlmvni or Calerulate oil's share of City expenditc)re,-,p upper limit of actual eq)enditures. which are net directly assirrwbac. Scenario i - �;?Il Re�vcrtues and A ten rcent Inflation rate Is also 7E_�N_-_m-_A_ rare:""` s—T Tom. : �Z3fT` at s assumed 1 iRema a tact ym Y nc on9 In surmnary, the following cis►xnptions In this scenario, the current nurr%ber or have bey made for the arsolysis In Sections wells (1460) remain through 1990. Ti-* 3.2 - 3.51 area -levoted to oil stays at 477 acres and overfill production Is constant. - Proposition 13 controls an tax rotes and property assessments will apply, Re"hues derived from the oil production fen and royaitim rise 10 percer.'- per yeor The City's share of the property tax which is he assumed Inflation rate. will remain 20.7 percent. Property tax rmvrAws rise at anlr two percent per year due to Pn4iosition 13 - Rates or, drilling pert-nits and other fees limitatiaow. All nther reveres rertoin the will not change. samer assuming tha. the same number of � permits Is Issued a och year, and .that fee j Totai City expenditures are estimated rates do not change. Overall, revenues � using the City-wide Fiscal Model ond increeme, but not as fast as expenditures. l tine General Plan. Figure 3`I a shows oll revenues and (Level of City sesrvices its constant. expenditures for 1900-90. Urdu Scenario • 1, Bail operations are a net revenue Inflation will average ten "ree3nt per gaierator for the City under the assurnod year. conditions primarily because the oil production fees, which makes up two-thirds 3.3 AnalE_of Sc*ncrios of the revenue, Is tied to the Camumeer Price Index; therewforee, this portion of the In all of the following scenarlas# reveroms keeps payee with inflation. eexpanditures are calculated two ways. The first mehod ums the "Weighted Average Fiqure 3.Ib shows the some sce=lo in Model" developed In Appendix A because it t'oerrrstont (1979) dollars," that 1s, the It probably the mast accirate and revenues and expe:reditums are c4usted for re asomble of the available models for (reflation. This firreflect*d shows mare clearly C010Aatlnq oil-related expendlr16"Ms. , hail not reevee�ues In the distance Eaeperrldituress are also predicted based an betwaen. the revenue line and the yhe Citywidn Meeckt because it is the expenditure Urm) drowse over three, ischnique used in•.many pre vio n analyses This is because ears-third of the revarKm and It gives the hi*st ecot es^*mote* of g rated by all are not Indexed to the all the models analyzed in App"x A. inflation rate. In +ether words. total Both modslt venire used to plot expenditure revenues simply do not keep up with curves in Bail of the figureeec ir_ this serctiexq inflation. CkoWte this decline, oil that, each figure shows two expenditure opeeraticm would continue, to contribute Hrm& Peyrh*s the best wary to intesrprtt net rertvemues througKwi the decode. thew graph u to view the . 15 Flgufe 3.1(e) Scenurio 2 - Pltme Out Cell 2pnf1cw% from �......,..,.._._..._.. The Townlot aM Uawntown urem lncivde wme of Ox mmt valuoble reni estate in r� Huntington Each. Coxrently, then rare also evroong the poorest sdr_tlorks of the oil Y fiald �n ftrms of produc:tlan. A feosible x» scenwlo, than, Is one where -$* volzie of the su*foc:e for otf er uses tong. horning) ea0welghs the value of the all being "" �,,.•� recovered, to sstrh a 4tuation, it is rwwnabie to assume that the all producers will gradmily abandon their yells In this area *M sell the fond for dwelopo m*. " "flare are 13.8 ocr+es, of oil lama in the Townlot. Arnlrroli awns approximately +0 .. .a�..r..�....,.�.....� ... .;..�.s�.. i a .�.._, tares for welds that are drection0y awe rM 0 wow cirilleed wWa the oce en. $imm theme wells do riot derive their all from the fleld undw CAW, a*wl or lb-- , We 04414S*ww. srss-eft amwA arAU M. the Twmloty they art anumed to remain. The other 13 ocres oere presmtd to phase out as follows om acre per rear, the first j 10 yews, aml tim ose r est In the last yew. Figure M(b) The 95 yells crroe anwre d to phases out as follows: Nine wells per year the first o 0 • i years, and five wells in tlot last year. Conditiom in the rest of the City remain 1 As the wells and aerreage decrease, oil ! rorrredrwea from oil production fees, pm�porty f tnms, and pwmit foaa &:maee aOXCO rdingly. It is amused that every wall In this area Is paying wastewater fops, but M that no drilling or redrilling Is dam head. The,overall City rovtnvas from all decilne only slightly. Vern ti trier rererwr b currently derived I'mm this part of the field due to Its low pro&ctivity (see Figuree e 3.24. Expoc-mlitures salsa de#aromer slightly a the number of oil wrens orrd oil wells In the 1M 111 M p ♦. M M j/ M �� q Townla� decrease. 'l dt" t,OU Wwra w twn�ti.r.r. ��•�+� arv��M►slras Figure 12b "m nr► rvms es'sd * tu►tew, for this scowl* in t 97P "•"'" WIN dollars Ngwtsd for inflation). Y e� 1 im aim 9"-9W lift Figure 3.2(,r) Note that oft hough both rervenoe s ar ra y«. r►r�,tir.;;!i!url:, de-cline, not rev&-mon-r (total reveir.)e m1mis totol cysts) pare slightly leis than un&r Srr::r�vrly i. From a f l,scml Stan, lot, altivaugh net :M revenues ore slightly I*%% In this scenc:rio ftn in Scenario 1, the amity continues to riot a high level of revenue from coil. At the some time, valuable land is made available for ather uses. aconoria 3 - All Inds dents Phow-, taut- 1�nT, M010. "o n. —w.. � r _ There are 95 ocres containing 268 wells than belong to oil producers cther than the tire* major companies. Scenarlo 3 could be ;enlized if the value of all real estate In -�.--+�- - --� s 1'itsrotirrOtory h ir+oreanes such that oil "•• °' " '' '' •► « • production by the Indepe n<lmts Is less profitable than other land usss. F!qure tawo' r all «ira.i l wl""Aaww. 100-I0ot V%dRkA M M-0A. Ma shows wNit haW" to all revenues txxl m dlturtes It the Indtprcents phase Gast as followss n1re ores phase oast per Figure 3'2Ca� year for tho-fiat 10 yaors, then five In the iost year; 24 wells phase out per year for the first !0 yeK rs, then 28 In the fast year, Oil revenow from the oil production fms, property tart, and permit fees decline as wells d ocreop decrease. All irWepandpnta cre eesurned to need wastewater pwmits, ra-A reverxm derived •from them are reds adoV with the wells. The nwrher of drilling and redriiling » permits. Is r,..,t affected. Thar amount of +rw.....+...,.,,.F•.+rw revenue 1c t raioted to Iota! retry--rue Is small becom these wei!s do not, an On » ayverasger pratbx* large gXMtltl&s of oil. Cests, however, are b*rr* according to nth"bar of wells drWar oar"". A well that produces large quontftles of oil req*ores approximately tht *ernf Cityr services ae a well that V.aducas Very +taM a ai a M «► n a w w little. Howsywt the better prcdwiing well garerates greater revwses 'a the City. arm ru r.r...we 60"IMM0. "WIN* s llw 0 Thug, the rtdio of 1r1i1iwwms to Cali:'s`' Ii a.rr wn..v. sweater for highly prQ&PctlVV wells* so i� ; :7 Jp1.wqt1m�. .... �.�...�,.......r—.. _ _ t I 4 /�•'Ifwrl�NrAlk sf�.l.rv�.w A.�M.��e ».M irticle,�earrIent wells ger►eroily ' its (.�1.04vice. iem oil per well than the+^e of t; , rr►u)c;rs, phosi rp Par% oul rer•noves of . the wen?s with chi worst revermw I;, crAt ratim. 'fh;s rn"ns that olthowjh foal rtuenues overall. are lower beromt e there bens f".: r a-tive. wells 'o?al a J.% ore. reduced evai more, -t ou,it ir,praving t.r. �., w eroll revenw -c�,)i�t ratio, Th-;efoze, net revenue !n reul &Ilrirs dcm•fine lam In Scenario 3 than in Either Isceviaj& socrlririr,. ,r„� �",,,.•�''° (See Figure 3.1b). Scenario 4 • LWtizatlon of i�* Town lot � rep:� (Y1T rea3 0 R9 niter. N 'ah(ttaatt�rt is a method by which several i;I pen&-04 L-an ;e--�liy join. togCher to vt as if they wero o single wntpany. This moil a M ►o M er a •r as lallo`Ns thee:-n to apply oinhcmed rscovery technalogl(a and Increase their all W...a.► r wo"0" *VW%UV&". st►w•r•ro� ,�-M*"U M...�,... proeiucrlex�.* �ntlC�ed r�Yef'v often ' ��•. ,,.�. ,,,�,• wrhi�� fip�ing wcit�� is �raxiy � lrigurs 3.30) mmpleae& By injecting water a? aerta>n ents ire the field, oil prodwilon in all wells oan rye dramatically I►nprna md. To do this in an cren with several owow.rs, all «• opow ators must coops,ate cxtd helr~ if!,Crce t ha venture. Unitization is t►f ten !�* -:r,l y ' way odditionol oil :n lae roc'.)wed In significant quanti•fles. n. ^ .•�., In ;chic sc*noria, %xritizatloti takes plcv.4 in thr: Townlot area. The number of wells / v7vi ainat the some becarise while same new wells ore &Hledr same existing, ineffiaaen wells rare dmmloned. In the first two ., �'' •...r,,,Q�, yews, CrIlling mW redr111ing activity increr.�es. Overall acreage drops by five acres bm of tha abandonmor t of s►xnc old facilitles cnd the consolidation of mast wtA, ones. F'r.wJ.—.tion levels are ► �hangad. �► N � ei e+ e:f w bI w e• M Cl7..00'yet►*%%ft r► w ft..r..... WO-ke"s y40+AV •t»�� * See Report #i in the serles, "PreserArV ism Www. Swfam Ac'olta to UrJwqmw,0 tail t� • :"•'""".�°"••'�""+`� Reserws3 In Dank VW Arot" aw � is i Begirwinivig In, Iflil,% ('Vr� x 8106 It 0)1 S.Op ol"W! I'll! "Ic the SMe 01111�x ( T o le... 01A, gur e s'6, I Wr COUSed hv 0-0 trir, !'&WO: 1I. ;J; ferc Neel, re V*rIA W_ fifmn o .-niMm X-t"i,o! "",1-1 borrels of oil. Pecrtj f i,oe iv.,,:nbec nl v, C%Als 0-mr J1-Oo ,e,.),- On Fig we Ub shows that In real tiollcr-s, rwt raqw�va Is greater in Sceilo.,!o 4 th(r. N) ary of ttmb pre,Y I :ec:r4- :1--, while cysts Js,:i;o#m% C1", dy-, �nllizatNwi t_,Ould incrome revamw.s while rwlrclng coits by Increasing productivity without Imra ng U IT of all number ovenull mumr of well, or m_reoqel� 3Asun"Cr 10 miq-vj.* ou mww%m via So4u%1-ww, ma-:v". r-%147i These v*narica raprwent four "sible Figure 3.4(b) f?,o1v:-vs for 0 W.rat4om In Huntlii9ton Beach. It 4 not known which, If cf thm will take p;oce- M(W likely, none of tfAm will amor exoctly as Mtroyed In • this awly?Js. Howeverr, some COMIUSIOn's em be &a*n from throe scenwim. Firot in any of thisa unes or cxmbirwition of them, It It cleir that continued oil operatic-* W111 erw%rnite sign-ilficont net re,vamm, for thm C It y. Soc*M, If �.nitlzotlm er.d onham*d ...... remyery projlwts do ocox aM are sucomfull they can help Increme the mvw%m to the City withmst significantly im-romllr% service amts. In some ones, City eVerdfurms ammia;OU" with oil operatlau awid won declIne Zlightly, while rovwK= would diurnatically Inc.-owe. TNrdr tt* IO1Wjm1VPV1q1 t Amators Am not emirlimft im large pallam of the revenues gwwa#W by oil aWatlarat cwW unlem *WW& sit VWMMMO ON "AMMOOM, 1"O.&MI WMICK fWaII&W I#*. w9tize.lan iml place, fty will not In 0* 119" IVA Impt. fuhwe. The three mcpw oil ampanim In key owes 1 • l~ IVon beach -w An-Arxiii LJSA, Cl-,eWrnn (AA. and 11111 on coil --- ar- chie"]y 1.5 Gnrfield/Goldenwe.st and recpor,s;bI.,: for tile. signific art rret rwva+ir,e3 l-own c)T mwnGsvy reas affarded the City by corrernt and _.xantirxjeJ �' �..y.._.____ ._ .._......_ all apcarstio► . (Ste Figure :3.5 .) The Garfield/Coldenwest anti the Townlot/Dcwntnwn r-<rts of th4► City were annlyzp—'I spt cif;cally boca,s� they are examples of men,s where the existlr►q oll aper•atioru, may be c4mging (See Figure f'iepr.�rr :S,'� Bo-§,h of there areas xer of greot Interest fce' future develo;xoent other than oil. Union 9s C,lievrcn 12% Downtown/t'owniat: A3 mentioned abcwr, 3-� own arec is especially interesting in light �%f the possiblity of it { f, recycling to new uses aid Its potential for unitizctlan and enhanced recovery, 'These passibilities were analyzed in Scenarios s and 4. This section simply sepnrates out rde tndnn* the, To",vnlot/Downtown from the rest of the City to help highlight the tisc"nl irnpacts �i cific to that Urec.. 1' Figures 3.6n to 3.6c Illustrate the following I possibilities-, 1) the exlsiing oil operations � rerriain actives ch)rIog the rw&xt decade, 2) the oil operation grac.'eral ly phase out dsoring the !96d-1 and 3) a unitization and enhcnced recovery program is undertaken. llta.inoil 889 The analysis Indicates that oil operations 1,-i this port of the City currently generate net revenues. However, rising service costs, " the fact that total revenues C)i 1 Revenues , 197 9 -•9 0 ; � cannot keep up with Inf lotion, will make these. "alter ope+rctlons net "losers" 14a j crs vs . independents . =-nel ime dciring the 1910s, ewtn If productiai remains at tot*Ws level. However, if a unitization program is undertaken arid is succesaf,,rl, the oil operations would became slgnif irant nest "winners" throughout the decade. ,-- -•---- -�-� Carflald/Coldenwest: The futc.re use of tq r r;+a west area has been the subjeci of ecwWderable debate in the City. One factor whist-. caild to considered ire any decision about t?* best use of this i Is the fiscal Impact of continued use ae 20 . ...a.r✓..w..rN.. .... .. •,.., r •r r11N•a...1• .. ..... . • . ....r. ... ii... ..........r.......w........r......r... . r• .. ..r.yr..ri .1/.i.1.l.I..rl.i': r .r•.1. \rl..r.\1\1..n•1 NIR V F r r. R` i■ :i#i::: Town lot/Down town ) JJ II ii r ,y w.•v w Mwlr .fir +n Now& I .v.erl CITY OF HUNiT.PNQTON BEACH MMONGM KOICH, C4PMNW adft DOV" Figure 3.*W(S) 21 i i Fiq 3.6(a) Figure ".a(c) er to ww .....r.� M.'d.MY MA. woo n �7 q it M N 01 67 i• •i VvAiN o"Atrw a! IMNtrM MA Hap9nut►m, ifr0-I"01 COMLA t CMAI lwr T m%k! him I%u ftvwuw Wd dwardibsoo, IWO-IM, WdLibLLMN 1197t (out"). 11►11 Na LW O. i lump J i Figure 3.6(b) key ter Mraww* . urw s>ry..�cse�•s. �tat..r�M IM�+1 ' e» I Ir at) nil production area. Figures 3.7a and � ;.7b Indicate the probable impacts of 1) oil I operatlorrr continuing unchanged in this " area for the rvtxt IC years and 2) the opuratiats gradually phasing out, At thlc w time, the uli pool under this srse doaa not appear to be a likely candidate fur unitization# to such a project was not __.a ..•+..r,� ■ _,;-- analyzed. IM0 in !R aW M O1 M �i 66 69 WS The figurer Indicate that current fiscal Impoett wo quite inslyniflesnt -- the • op aratlorm demand i e+w costs but contribute little revenue. During the chords, even If production could be maintained at currant level*, the operations to ml to boctnme net losers; but p+r. again, the �%'Pparcta we so wmall that they are essafally Inconsequential. r U , its"I • F hurt 3.7(b) w MMYMr.'Mr.Fq iM Mitr.»Y+,iF+'+� M .ba�.....�. rMtiw .e r- +q�ar.�-...w� �....�n ��...•....1_..�._...n.�.-a.� L.��l•._....�r...��....r�..�.11..�..�...-_��r.F,��+r nrsi rl 1f rl 1 o! M It P1 rf w ► Y I $1 11 M M M 17 rf 1� p I prf[1*W�1.b�nsa.e A, CMl A1y...r4 rvl MWWnfi l{r . CmfWd elglrv+ t "W 61 OWJON M 04 PAP-AU9UW"- Nr1-1flo, � rn Ctr�ic.{�. lfltl•lf*ot ►11 t�attJtwr f►+w-tea i key (1171 petty+I. 111ti w)hrtl. ntwr et..1��I F iqu t'e 3.8 Rt If 1 •+, WSIOltettld iNsea> It IOo1M7 one 6ja iL%u*@. ChtV_M14* NrOol >q Alterrrstive Devetlowment 1'n the TcYwnlS&! Downtown ros: Another aspect of the � quest o-n o �w other oll productlan should be encouraged to continum canters around the development that should replace oil " - oparations. This section compares the fiscal Impacts of oil op,retlons in the Townlotl Downtown to those of likely satomste uses them.* Tt* Townlot/Oowntown Area Is pmdatninantly medium-density residential, �. and all lsnc% are xorod to recycle Into the +wr •► t1 rs r1 M fit so N M some kind of use. This, mnb!ned with an probable Vot Mny oll tend In this area that recyclac will batorne medlum density reel denti al. wxllvt ftdir.-O.wSlty R,0916+0tlat Aw"ftui 6n1 ffffl1*14Lt.ra1. 1e1e-15001 noto-tot Vht1Nrw ASno 11010 "Hers). e The Gairfle►ld/Galdenweat we* ii • spedal am. A study Is now btk-q aWduatod to data tmins the beat fukt" Wom of the land In that arty. 23 a A — . i I I r �� I r ' �isr`ing the City-wide! Fiscal Impact Model, In ttr Towniot (Fiore .1,Sa) follmv n 4eavenuseners and expenditures resulting from. almlln trend at a similar mognRude (after tecyclierx of the U oil ncros In 0* Towolcr. f Si88) au the raves sues and a epse3ndite.Keses eres to vnedium density rooldentlel can Loa from me-Glum density resldential In that approximated, This Is 111tAtratesed Ira 1Agurer w-es Wlrptre 18). Further, It. should be .� 'mith half of the rsorerrle retcyclinq Iri nctad that 1tther of thede ck-ye!opmait 1986, aid the other half in 2982. typers hsees a ve v%, lass-99 negative fiescetl Impact — in the range of five to 1D The rsumbara Ovwn are rokujsi estimotessy thousand doll" pea, year. but the trends end general magnitudes are clear. At t1mee goes on, revenues decrease The concluesl n Is that fiscal) Impacts, while and ee xperrvditares Increase elljitly. It is Irnportaeert, coo rvt provide a criterion for apparent that Lhls type of deveeloprneest chnnalm, one of these r+rvtlopment types generates nes revsnucee in the year It is over the other. This underscores the built, but because of rising coatA, Inflation limitations of fiscal analysis it is a leery and limits an property tax rates and Hpartent Input into the decision-makinq assessments, it tends to bemme a net loser proce3a -+• but there are other shortly sefterward. (Sad Section 7-3) co rim lrStratIons of greet importance that are involved. Section MJ dlsscume►s throe The most revealing aspect of this Issues enure fully. p►w!esctiegteti Is tt*L- the r•evrentme acid ` expesnditu+m from oil opeeratiory remaining I 1 24 i I� i 4.0 Beyond Fiscal lmpacU Prevlt.wis awtiou frame discussed the 4.1 Non—Fiscal Ccats Importance of fiscal knpact analysis In land use decisiw6. Although knowled9e of Aerstheticps Oil wells imposes adverse ° f(scol f mats Is Impottant, that v 5 Ise, and odor Imptr:ts. Pumping information Memo Is Mt sufficiem for the units rind tanks Impose the neWtiva visual � daclslomwnaker. The effects of a for,-. use Impacts casoclate*d w1th omhore ail on the Clt)es budget roust be W ancod with prcduction. They are 1(:�rge, unattractive i other paseible IrMacts brought about by fac111tiees that give on "irw1ustrial" look to chorusing ono land use over another. This any area in which they are located. section, while not Intended to disewnt the value of fiscal enalysis, underlines its Occasiorially, ail wells emit gases that Ii�nitations by briefly presenting some have a suiphurous odor. Although the odors mb)orr "nar►..4 bcal" ccets and bw.ofits. may not ocoir daily (ond depend, of course, on the direction of the wind), when they Ceertorin aspects of all productl:x i me are present, the smell can be offoulve. k►te m to hewn krepmts an the qua.*"`v of lifer than we difficult to express In terms Finally, the pumping Wts, injectors, of +cialleers. Markof forms Wane do not compressors and drilling rip can be noisyt usualiy maize these affects and fiscal The severity of noise Impact varies with walysio Is not Intended to account for oven's proximity to the caWipmmt and the them. That► must be recV, I%ed esrxf Yype of mMWrwnt. infraducwd into the discussion ttirc u�lh mm* a wr rnwhanism (ee.g. the political The nests astoclate3d with these kinds of Qroom). "-arse impacts Include the► dinilmished enjoyment of rearaotion crew, lowered 4SM"esv of thessr lcep oats and ptaWty Muss end !e rd visitors 1s bs n(Its psr aced wIX off production are nsacby ammnercial arses,- d4emsWl briefly btlewr. uao, Some extreni,t odor and rx)i!te itnpoc:t.S c-on Improved Ba*lonce Of royments: Wi� n the also Impose odvevse health +effect, on Dsi'itedr'Stattes stirnr�s mcir�� rnoney ore persons rear tlx� offendinq site. Imports than nttxsr cvLntries spend an Americcn exports, there. is a net flaw of Opparturilt C—dts: An oppori unit' cast is dollars exit of the country. This is rolled =rievifobly fi pp6 ci in criy slfuatic-n where a c:n unfrr arable bola;ce of pcsyrnenti, The choice^ is made bwtween tuna err more "::Jesirable rairtificutl" of this situation alternatives. By & osing any of the are well known •-- it aggravates iriflcrticn alternatives, the opfjortunity to have crie cmd weakens the dollar. Because Imported of the others is nemsscarily foregorw,. In coil is our si 'Vie largest import, substituting Vie case of oil praduwticni in Huntington domestic oil for• irnported oil is a Reoph, an ►►pportLn ity . •-,t ;s incurred by significant :Ptap to return inflotion using lond for oil procioction rather than arid strenathen the dollar. same other kind of development. Em 1, ormecitt A third benefit the City All io1-d In SouvN.- r Callfarnio Is becoming r ves from. oil operations Is the increasing!y val►xtble. Housing Is In mmiplayment fhe industry brings to the pa;tNvIarly short supply. in light of this area. About 600 persons are directly situation, the opportunity cost of mil cmpluyed In oil operraticns in Huntington production may b�. too high In saner parts Beach. 1.4 In odditIon, oil oMators of the C`1Yy. O,•► tier,► other h oA, developing support Imal businesses by purchasing Me surface. precludes the opportunity for goods and services in the City. (this is rail prodc :tion. Unless It Is clear that oil somefimes called a "multialler effect".) prorksrtion is iess valuoble than another use of fire land, preserving occess to the sail 4.2? Ferderul cmd Lacol Perspectives on from the surface is quite Important. For hlon- ism hosts aikTgeneflts ex-X»pie, if Oil Oil surface in Tovmlot were recycled to other L► IM, unitization interestingly, two of the major benefits of (wA ree.-overy of millions of bear els of oil) coil production (reduced dr,ent'ence or Ymuld rw longer be poss'Ne. ("ere Report imported oil and Improved balance - of .. . I 01, entitled "i''reserving Sari ofie: Access to payments) are greater - than - local in Undergrmond Oil Reserves in Developed scope. This means that the City's oil Areas", for a detaiied discusslan of this production protects the nutionol interest pr►obiem.) by helping to improve the roomy and contributing to national security, 4.2 Mon-fiscal Senef Its However, nrany of the costs, such as offensive odors, visual Impacts and reduced Reduced D !nde7nce On Foreign Oil: A property values, are local In nature. widely nowledg problem toeing the nation Is the uncertainty of our energy Tfw foci that the positive and re7rtive supply in an errnergercy. Every barrel of Impacts of oil operations are primarily felt oil produced in the Ignited States is at different levels of governrnrnt, potMltloiiy a substitute for an Imported incrersres the difficilty in assessing them. one, card the Importance of small fields in Coastal Energy Impost grants, such as the contrlbuting to the domestic oil supply one funding this study# provide funding should not be understated. For example, from the federal government, which the Huntington Beoch field Is the seventh benefits frorn Increasing energy largest oil prodcicer in Collfomla and production, to [oral governments to help gNodum three percent of the state's oil. them analyze and mitigate the adverse rlry-five percent of Callfornid's sell effects of increased energy production wv H s fields evert smaller Alrh tend to Impact the local community. waw 1 i w Conclusions Before concluding this report, two This treml should continue through the Irnportant qualifications to the analysis 199t"s +-- oil activities wi l I generate I must be stressed. 'he first Is to reiterate reveFims of similar magnitude for the next • the simplifying assmptions etude decade. However, ��r* If production throughout the report. The second Is to levels stay the some, these revenues tend emphosi" the Ilmitatlens of fiscal analysis to decline slightly over the next ten years, � ` -- It Is only and kr4xwlant input to the because property tax revenues fall behind decislon4rw frig process. the I of I at i on rate. We report set out to auswor the gemral An important finding In this awlysis is that ssstlon> what are the fiscal Imparts mast of the oil-related revenues are tied to r�ssultinp from OR a�atlorwe an the City of production leveis. Thus, the tlree major F`IIowington Sonefi, This question was all oompanie►s with opexotions In the City addressed for 1979-W, as well os f or fire (Aminoll p Chevron, Union), which occount reext docadd under four diff*rent for aver 90 percent of total field-wide scowles. Furthers specific attentior+ was production, o ntrlbute mast of tSwse allvm to tiro Townlat/Downtown mod rwmnues to the City. Even if all the cO1910 Goldsnwest art etas, Inc►uding how Independent all operators were to oil opeM' 0f res wAght mare to other land phase-nut of production by IM, not use�t. rams;wnv would remain about the wne . through the 19Ws (sere 1ection 3.3). As emptraolz d by thn fist qunllfiwton Mhowe„ thr a*Wt rwrywlcai figures (MY be Otner notewarthr findings are the eci to d`.m"art, but the ge ral aonsegL ences of tnitlxartlan In the Irer�dl arts! malpiltudas am fileor. �ll Townlest. Such a project would aatIVIC i are a roof rewme tat far *cma�tleally lerareasee Rise praductla► of the C In 1 Ml fh� �ar oolvred nx ny of NO learn of fielWO wells ande abet 000 In rwrt r• um from all althm*S not novena would be dwllrli+g olr lon Wien 24. by the late 198%, total nest rw �:,,; 27 r 1 I • r Werated for the decode are gees*teO In In theise cree(A ore likely to !nyolve revenue this sce.xrrfo (see. Secti,in 3,T. lasses M well. Jr) the bais of fiscal impact, nwither Iund use option Is The study of oll reve rives r. ,>d t.1,perAlturr_s ner_�e53arily preferred, Aitholugh V,e fiscal In the C;arffel l Goldeyiwerst and Townlot/ imposts of both uses are Irnpa giant, a Downtown areas ,are qu!tee revealing. With dt^lsion to twvc-ouroge one over li m other rrhe esxcvptlon of a future where unitization will depend on other considerations beyond of the Townlot takes place, oil operation fists. l analysis (See Section 4.0). in these two araw will be net revenue beers for the City. i-kmever, the oil Thi3 Is mi truer however, if the Townlot is activities In these areas sanest be unitiziA and a nhamed recoyery Is considered a major f naewiai burden to the. sm.ce, sfrrl. In thnt tose.. tNt- Oty moy goin City. The magnitude of funds galned or significant revenues from tail activities in lost by the City in these: two cases is In the the area (Sec Figure 3.5c). range of $5,000•j 10,000 (see Figures 3.5a, b, c•. mid F'Igures 16c, b). Further, based his a result of Proposition 13, property tax cri the City-wide rnodeho aextlmate of reverwws, which have been the traditional &x!n diturees and re:ve"-,s generated by financial base of local governmerets, will rnedlwm-dansity residentia) development, not easily keep pace with inflation. it, -too, Is a net revenue Icaer of similar Consequently, for some land use.#, the cxxts magnitude (See Figure 3.7)., to the City In providing services wil I tend to exceed the revenues generated by those Here aSpin, . the limitaillons of fiscal uses. This study indicates, he✓wever, ?hot cvlysla are confronted. fail activities in at iemt for thwe: next decade, City-iyide off the C(7fle.Id; Coldenwest and Townlot/ operatiara w11l root fall Into this category Downtown areas will probably result In owe will contirv)e to generate significant revenue Irises for the City. net revenues to ii* City of Huntington Medium-density r"Identicl dpvelopmen's Becch. 28 A1,j1EN? ,iX A Mcdels fox 'Distributir Gitt� x t�iliturts icy i)iffere:nt E.e�rrei llsr 'Fypr ..�._.._....._�..��..w ... .......�. - Are Important port of floor. 1 iripoct anolysis to tryir►g to deterrr-irie proportion of City eNDenditures can reasonably be attrlbutt�a to the different land uses +arrd ;elated wilvitics in thrs City. As discussed In the Mxt (Section 2.2), r f ow types of wl.,enditures can be trcpced more or less directly to different lard uses. ExcampIA" were e�pendiiures on police and fire calls where tiro City keei,s itc-cards of t1w. [acotia-is of th,* calls, We ,avooned that they percentage of total caller generatad by each land use category ways a reasonoble measure of tho peraentuge of total expenditcrres an those calls that each land use category canerited. Another example was the expenditures far t;re salary avid benefits of the City oil Inspector. We assumed that his duties were tined directly to oil pr%xiuc1Ion activities In the City and that thane expenditures could be "assigned" to oil produriion aces. The great majority of wNpenditures, however, carwxot be troced tc% particular uses. Consequently, a mo&l for estimating the proportions of expenditures, among different land uses, which are not otherwise directly asslgmble to those luryd uses, was developed. EXPENDITURE MODEL A Word an Models, Models cs'a approxirnations of reality. They are too)s for making complex problems comprehensible. This necessarily me-mu thai simplifying assumpt4 s roust be made about the problem to be r wAvI&J. It b� very Important, therefore, to make r'erasanable., defensible wwurnption3. Ti* key to building a good model is to rnaxirnize• Its accuracy without makiN it tc* M,nrlex. A goW model 13 aca)rate enough to be useful, " simple emigh to be clearly understood. The a rrditure model loud in the "lysis was c%sigmd with this CIS d gcxYl. Sgme Important issues were considered in constructing the. muclel. The first Is the informatIon required by the model, because the available date limit the rouge of models possible. The nyxial scrr.rght is they most se:-rsitive possible with Infmmotion that is readily available. Secondly# the expenditure nwde' must d:a►tribute ants among the various types oY land uses In 7 way c nsl*tent with expectations formed by reasonable assumptions " Informed.opinion, Although .4 purpose of this mode! Is to estimatsr wxmignoble expenditures attribut.:bls to a0 activities, It comsat be used for that. purpose unlews it distributer costs among all land use types Ina wary that is reasonable. Finally, the model and awlysis should be reproducible.15 Any reader should be able to vnderstand "-*two the members came emus," aid ovither antrlyst should be able to occumulate the data and use the model of some time in the future. If this is not potable, the usefulnea of the study► Is questionable* 29 r r The EwWdlivre Model for Dist ing Unczxiynohle Ccxoo Two trio or• cos 557pi'lon,s w rp rnnde In de6tining sa mrc t+ ;ii itxafc unnisigr*61e costs. First, drnassimnble c=ts should he borne by rail rnen6ei. of the C:lt,/, occardlrK4 to Some deeterminatiearr of ewsch memhe4r's 'If alr shore.'1 Seerwices whose c osfs are enamigncable are treatr_d as "public 900�b".16 A public good modes tt* curnmurilty as a whale better off, no mc:iter how much of the rtoM eoch member of the comrnur)lty a.tmlly "corzurne%11. Ben"fits from these accrue to all us mernt)eri of the comrri,x)Nty, and not solely on IF* basis of coruurnption. Wherefore, all who live, dry brfsinew, or town property in tN* rity s otild mritI,NPty tt,rir short to tt* r"Yirriuniiy. To determine. a cch soigment's "fair stare", we r*xt assumr*d that two key foctors can be used to estimates Ow stare of City expenditures for each land use type. These ara 1) the area of the City a partir.Wor load use type occupies, and 2) the number of crnits of that land use type located In tlx: City. Area Is simply the. ►acreoge sa particular InM use t)pe occuplets. It can be curgued Omt as Mre area in the City developst, expenditures increase., and ttwt #4- cvret-ge devoted to different usw reflects their share of owrimuilty expenses. "l./nita" are measures of the degree of dev-1opment of a particular laird use. For reside otial uses, a "unit".Is a dwelling unit. For commercial and industrial usm, the numbper of "units" is oanurneed to eq+ial the number of business pormits Issued to that wrtimlarr use; for ail, it is the nurnber of wells; (obviously, vacant land has no "units"). "fhe logic for this Is that eeoch "unit" Is on !ntlty thot does N.),ssine:ss with the City, mi each unit gt`rrerates costs to the City. As units increase (i.e., as development Increenses), casts Increase. The relationship between ea x"e arrci Lmits is called "density' and refers to the: ratio of units f to =eage (e.ga dwelling units per acre!, oil wells per cx:e, etc.). Wa as►3wre them as density i Increoms, total City expendliurees increased (although the: cveroge expenditure per unit may decline). Tne models analyzed use acrergr or units or both (density) as measures of the share of total unossignesd coats that cal be attributed to different krod uses. Analyzing Histgric Data i The first approach for asutimating unassigned costs for different land uses wos to base o twrnputer to analyze historic data. By u;sing a statistical technique coiled "stepwise regression", we tried to sere how the City"s total budget has charVeed over time and to relate throe changes to changes In the units and/car developed acreage of different lam vse types. Unfoxtt-nately, accurate Information Is ovailubl� for only the lost few gears, and despite o4ustme nts for time and inflation, the variables were sir similar to one another (highly correlated), that no Inference could be made frnm the results with ony degree of nonfide ncea.* Therefore, offerts to design a model based strictly on putt data trends and regression amlysis were abar6pned. Reesidmis extd Penn sn correlation ooefficients were antalysed. The cermumeer price Index wins used to adjust for inflation and on attempt to "detrond" the data by using "dummy" variables was mode. The variables were too highly correlated to give meaningful results. 30 k. our �rGher• mndels were tried. The fiat seer mly t� pr►.�portiu in Lotal ► biveloped ecreoge tu eatimate; the 'hare of imessignable costs far different land ;,me. The iresc:ond usrer, only units. Thr_ last two use both itereage and units trlbh3itya to asflrnate the proportion of expenditures for different lood uses, one elciply avariaylrig acreage and units, Y *-.7A the Other twatIng ttee two fsr.tore by M "weir*ite dl overage" teerhI pique. These are discussed below. �. f,7onlaved Acrea a or City-wido Moodel Mode! I dottermines tha fair share of tinassignod expenditures by the aureags of each 1wid utiw tyre; eov.h livid tmel rlre lw4a a Om,.-e of I.stiataal(rin f write r(jual to the portion of total developed acreage occupied. This �e the approarfi .raid !n ti-e Ultrasystteryti or "Litt-wi Wl Fiscal Impact Kx*I. l roc example, alms residential use ocrupy 78 pee re , of of developed orrreage in Huntington Bee,r►rh, 73 percent of unassigned a xpenditores w,e Ott;i'.r.it�-i :a resickmees. 8y the same mothodt 10 percent: of unassigned coats ore artt., ')utod to commercial uses, 8 percent to Industrial uses, and 4 percent to oil. i',lote U,at variant land racelves no shame of trysts. This model Is cunsidared una extreme, taking a.-ly area Into account. Advantagest This rnouts, Is simp!ee, nosy to understand, and reproducible. The data requirements can be readily fulf filet!. I Disedvantregnst It eerounu for only one of tfw key determinants; It assumes that degreo of development to not sn Important factor In distrIbutlnq unassigned costs. It aiso Implies tart every acre generates costs equ311y. Further, since It. Is only concameed with developed acreage, It does not account far vacan.- land. 1 I1. Units Model Muriel II relies solely on degree of development to apportion unessignerd casts among different land vsas. Recall that "units" are a measure of degree of development, end that residential "units}° refer to dwelling units, cornmeercial, and lndu&rIal "unfurl are equated with business licenses, and en nil "unit" Is an oil well. Bate, again, vacant land Is aaaumed to be vvetless. 'Phis mt-ee) Is considered the other extreme, taking only degree of development into account. Advantages: This modal Is also simple, easy to understand, reproduelbie, and has n1nimeMl date regi deem onto. Disedvantsgess It completely d)scoLnts area as a cast factor, and essumes eerh unit generates costa equally, regerrdlerare of density. SInav there are no ur,lta rn vacant land (by definition), It Is left aut of the analysis. Most Importently, the distribution of costs among the uses seems skewed - residential is assigned nearly all roosts, while Industrial gets almost none. The nr.xt two model* try to account fnr both acres Bred units. 31 I a r I I l e . "1 lII. Sl � 4► r i� Mr��i Model iII simply uveroge-, tip fiat two. For *xarnple, res!denfiiai usoi ewe allocated 78 percent crA 92 pure^-w,t shures by the first oral saam� iYioWso retrwtively. This averotes to 65 peftrcent. By the sort* prmess, commercial receives 73 percent, Industrial 4.7 iy�r�-eni arerf oil 10 percent. Aldvantagos: This model does vat mvere!y irx.lrease data rw4uirenvent,ii, cv effect r!iproduclbflif�o. It is still c mparohensif rxJ more '+sitiye to 1' for"t that 47"Ovally offft:t f-:aatx. Dlsadvantexte-st Ara nrid dw,,;,r"� of r.ire g1ven equal irtXaortarocr: in determining the ware of �oinss!grq-d r.osts otiribo able to exxli ase. This n"Ons That cosh ckr rr t Mary occordirrq to the density of u": and assurneos the same worage density f*r cli uwnx. Further, vacant land is urwccormted for. IV. Wer:loted Average Motel Model IV acca!nts for areo and &9. rere of *velolmmnt in a different way. It weighs the tw* fwtors so •tit it is more aensitive to density. This Is dorms by � adding the nuniber of units assigrobd to a partic-04j. use to the number of OLre3 assigned to that use. This surn Is divided by the tot-il of ul; units plus ul! acres In the City. This "welghtv-d averoge" gives, slightly mores itnporta,,ice to riegr+ee of dweloprnetit cos a fortor than acre -ige. TNL% mawts that more densely developed ocres are rare "ntly than those ie w di:nsely developed. (This 13 true every if averragn cast per unit Is Iesa in more seedy developed arensi Overall costs terms to be high- ,., in Inigher density woos.) 'f his rrlodel atte-rbvtes 87.3 percent of unassignables casts to residential, 5.2 pe:-evit to commercial, 2,3 ppwcent to Industrial, 2.3 percent to oil, and 2.9 to vacs it land. Sec Table A.1 bOIovr. Advantage's: This nx4el has the same data reuuiremmts and reproducibility as the previous modeii. It Is slightly more vornplex, but its increased complexity can he justified by goirms In setnsii ivity and acevrvcy. It is superior to the third mode) for two reasms. First, It can cc-count for vacant led In a reeosonabie way. Second, by giving slightly mare weight to the degree of development i actor, then nro&I !% more sensitive to d ns!ty of use - I.e., higher densities are co sidere d more costly. This N c mare realistic treatment of how the ttepe of land use Is likely to off act oasts. 32 '4tiY aa.. ra.µ..1.....n. , .319¢rlPxixlon of Uniealgr,abio Carta Uetng Wolghted Average Moel Acres J,nitx Sum gib of Total Realdm0m) 65 91207 62,251 7104' j 67.3% o rt�et olal 9 1,197 3.0117 4,224 5.2 Industrial 6 92�) 965 I r equ 2.3 3 4*72 1,460 11932 2.3 Vucmnt 17 21-410 a 21410, 2.9 TOVALS 14,2a1 67,703 81091.4 300.0% 8canree. City of Huntington i3•ach Pimming Division. LRJR FY�>•Yi//MYI�"1LY Aft TABLE A-'. tun ington beach plenning division 33 t „v yy.., f �w Diser;vc ntope n Model IV is the lest burdemd by the dlsodvantcWs djgc%ased PWve. Arguments of a more gwwal natur about the aownptiaw and level of saphistiesotlan of oil theca reds arcs discvssad veisewtwre in this sectlan. Pr or the p xpaws of this owlysisl, the lost rrodil meets the criteria for a mac# moduJ laid out of Ow beoinnire of this suction better than the ethers oa Idsred. tthe nw4als de�v�eloperd, this "Weighted Averoq* Model” Is the mast a�vrate, wit a►r►fuston end with rrilnimni date mquire mentso It g~ate,i reasonable results. This is 0a rnadel used to carry on the analysis (att cost oalculoti Wng Chet "City-wide Model" are also presented for COMPotisore). 34 i7 yr r t t. . 4 1 . • APPENDIX e w r T. r 1 ReAmws From Clthsr Energy Facilltifts 4 Althmuo this report fame* an oil operations, there are rather evvergy faclUtleo in the City and evastai zone. These Include a Gulf tali Compmy tank form arrd cffiliated pipeline franc-hisesi a Chevron USA tank fcsrm; a Southern California Edison Company power plant, tank farm orW pipeline and utility franchises; and other pipr:lirex and utility franchises. These facIlltl+rs are likely to remain In Huntington Bomb for vxne tkne. Swuse of their permarint roturn, a fiscal analysis of those operations Is rmxty Ion rellevert than a similar +riariysls of the 4leas permosnent" oil operati". it is Important to mote, however, that the City derives si;lnlficunt rwowes from thess facilities. These reventma fIgures are presented bel&m. The reverm- tar 1979-W areas follows. Gulf Tang Foams Property Tax r 61690 Pipeline Franrh;se 6 047 TOTAL $ � Ctwvrcn Tcnk I'crmi Property Tax 4 7[11 TOTAL ' ' Edison Plant and Tank Farr: Prx Wp , Tax PIpeRne Franchise 4,362 U r,tt y Fray.+In I SN 131 'DOTAL Scxrthern California Gas: Utility Fcanchis# �,5:9 642 TOTAL Ofhsr Pi llna Found des: �car I�htln� $$1 ii,106 TOTAL ow dCG�a . °S'1 ,fit Total rWwwW to the City from thaare fosallitles Is $1,126,M for 197W. "V olirra arks utility franchlse tax rates we se by evntracts between tsa City art; ow vewlem awnpmlas. The major fasctm that affect pipeline rat4w are roue and Irrrrgth of pipe aid the yrmiy flow thiw* tine ripa. Utlllty nitres arw booed' on groats sales of the �t axrie by the franchise (Pig. ram, Ole-.11-icity). 33 t, i, r 1 ' Many of the aontr'ac:ts w-e old, and -set rates that we quite l w. Ocs •trateg;o for It"asing revenues from these soureas In renegot.lotion of the contracts when tiny mire. A City otdinance pissed in 1978 established pipeline franchise rotes to be sippiled In f%Auro dbntmts. '1'her base tawtwm am highar then those not In Ow part.o but more Impartentlyp they are adjusted annually according to :he "Wholesale 'Producer' Prices" 1 at dbx - e measure of the Inflation re- As the old franchlse agreements are renegotiated In secordoft. with this ordinencer tha City can expect increusee. revenues that will keep pow with Inflations. Finaliwo mme of the contracts are ")ndeterneinate", i.o. they have no terinination date. 1z may be possible for the City to re nagotiete thwi by mutual agreement. table 8.1 shore more explieftly the terms of each franchlea. f I I r r. x • HLNTMTC04 BEACH PIPELNE APE) WI<ITY F KANf:45175 LW*h of Monier to City �ts � FY '9•,80 Commr)nt-a!z Rgardima Fr�n�cF+�► Tr tkwty !o Cal Qkm 40 yn eradiate S $29,641 Agroen so. co oolnr provision that a 1f107 .oto of relium no few than t`A highoat pararitIle rwceivW by any attw city being served by to CA Gas. MIRY Sa Cif Edsmn indoterminete 193,1)l The agg,ragste affect of tho flared Tlnimel rate ;adopted In of return, Indotormlrrtr fpr►gth Of term, and the 1lrIF) geometrically Ine easing coots to the,City for att"t IlghtlrXI has traulted In perlrpa t'he poweet telie of frendNso ravenuo to energy torts of arsy Lity dealing with Su Col Edison. PlpoMrr UrJan 011w 25 IN "ry 412 VIM MI fixed return to City-Unch"d Moos 1iy19 IWA—based on 10 cent per inch of plpoliaa diameter/pr lineei fomo or ter of the qmm a Wmd mmipto erl*V pow use of fronrhiso, whidwyor In grwter. pip*Bft Atlantic 75 Ire ending 1,149 Same tr.rns N above. itIchtioldw 1CA8 poslirw Tr,tftvo is yre ending 2,887 Sorm terms os ebove. Pipeline Giuir 50 Ire ending Prroont into of return-fixed river IM—how IM13 (W been &04 per boatel X 2%. (Ca ,rhlrxxf'1 PIPWIne Ckdf 50 ym ondiry itiment rate of retun -rixsd since 1456-4as 2O06 been S.AA per barrel X M. pipallne Gulf 15 yn, ending 2.4m Present rats of return is flked at SZ,Wf'i per (tmk ,arm) 19M am". Pipoiine Usr4wd Gm a yr+ rt Im lee Present rite of ret%�,,--nksd eince lft6—tws Zu06 bw 2% jai the revsnkr derived from use of Frwmhkw. P?p IIn& Sa Cal Edlson irefetsr'minsty 4,U2 Correct rate of return Iv darlvAd from 2% of (17") the gases an UM recwipto Wising fMM use of frw :!hlm. pt edra Pacific 40 yre ending 129M Curm t rate of Mum Is derived from 2% of Lighting 2010 the grass rorml septa, and/or 1% of the roverjas fray+ the ails of gas wltNn limits of City WWW rtsrremm • IN" flrrahlees wo Nectar to an peeduellen In the City, and we'e included 1'% oil revenues. Narita MWIlmajosiv fma 1161 ymi AY15tw to City Adm:n►strater, 3uly 14 1977, rpfttod with fl"s front tha City Finarroo TABLE 0.1 huntinwton beach planning Id vision 37 I1 N0T'5 If Although this "In* cKxnpan), has a scpecial petroleum fire capability, it is frequently used to fight structural fires, thereby providing extra service to the City as a whale. Further, the tank fcrm,% and pipelines that are not directly related to oil production on the City (see Appendix d) require the protection provided by the cornparsy. The expenditure flqure shown above is a staff estimate of the oil production share of total emits for this company. 2) Patterson, George M., "Allocating Expenditures to Land Use Categories", p. 1370 Munici I Finance 361 May 1964, p.p. 136-9. Also we Patterson, George M., "Where s i�tyy3pew Its Money?" Western•C 1tZ, September 1963, p.p. 46-47. 3) The City recelves► additional an:xml revenue from the State of California Lands Cor' mirsion equail to one percent of state royalties on tidelrxrd oil ieases« This fund Is rerverdn Wdgat (604) "State Oil and Gas Leasee"t and was equal to approxtmate,ly $100,000 In 19 -00. Howeve -, these monies are not general fund reeventees - i.e. they are to be used for purposes specified by the State:. Therefore, they were not Included In caiculadons of ail revenues. i 4. Thr. State Board of Equalization rule 46e allows County assessors to reassess mineral rights valuations as oil prices rise. Since Propositiai 1: permits assessments of new constructions the rule carques that an incre se In it* price of oil changes the value of an oil deposit such that it Is treated as "new cons trLKaion". This ruling Is currently under litigation and, for the purpose of this report, it is assumed ftt the twc percent limit on retLuessrnent applies to mineral rights. Should the ewrts rule in favor of the Board of Equalizations, City Revenuers from property taxes on mineral rights would be higher than ttosC shown. 5) This figure was obtained from Mr. Chuck Kruger at the Orange County Assessor's office. S) This figure was o5talned fra-n Mr. [fan Brennan in the City Finances Department. i 7) The number of wells conr—cted to the wastewater system was provided by Mr. Frisk Gr .ibourn, the City Cie ir.:pector, 8) This figure was obtained from the oil inspector, Mr. Rick Grurbaum. 9) The spec f runchisees responsible fur these remnues are shown Its Table B.I, of this wepott. The figures were obtained from Mr. Lean Brennan at -,the City Finanes uepar tmai rt. id) In 1933, Southwest Exploration Company began to produce oil from wells In the towniot ogres tlonaily drilled to deposits under the ocean. When tl~e State discxrverad (later that yew) that Scuthwiest was depleting an oil pool In Stote tidelands, It obtained a court order• restraining Southwest from operating theme wells. The 1936 State Lands Commission Act speeelf ied terms under which production of tidalnrds depwits could resume. Howavor, to reach the all field from tht towetleit, the wells were dr111od under land owned by the City. The City granted Sovvthwest Emooration rights of way under City land in an "Agresemmit and Eamneret for Right of Waye In Ida I9" , This agteernent provides the City a mon!My royalty "equal 'to two ftwcent of total royalties paid to the State of Colifornld" for oil production an NWIc Igervxosis Code 392. The Statee's royalty Is approWnxttelr 13 percent of total We" two percent of Mils (the City's royalty) is .2642 penreent. Aminoll, USA now • 39 *Wales the wells and l,xays the royalty as specified in -the agrreem%:_J$ It should be noted that other analysts may use different InfIotIon figurees. l-taw+eerver, It Is unlikely that a different Inflation rate would significantly affect 1he gesrwof cenclusion s drawn from the analysis. 12) The City "ns mineral rights to 125 parcels In the Townlot)Downtown area. If an snhanCed recovery project Is undertaken there (and is successful), the City will receive odditiargal revenue from royalties earned by its mineral rights interest. The amount of the royalty will depend an the queantity of coil produced, the profit an that production, the portion of the total Interest in the. project owned by the City and the terra of the unitization agreement. Secousre these factors are nafi yet knom, the setirnate of City revenues shown in this sc+rnario Jo not include receipts from royal ti m paid by than unit. 13) Edwin S. Mills, In The Economics of Environmental Quolit y W. W. Nor;eon Co., N.Y., i 973, p.p. 141-I , ear-6 s a rm -of estimating the health and property damages from air pollution by using property veoium. The theory Is that rents end sale: value of homes will be lower In heavily polluted area, Band that this ,reflects the vale,* people place on cleaner air. This theory could be applied to the aesthatle: Impacts of oil opeer,atiom in Huntington Beach. If It were, one would expect rents and property ve lues of dwellings adjocent to oil wells to be lower than similar dwellings elsewhere. This Is a reasamble>e txpe clatiean for which we have some preliminary evidence, and a study of actual property value3 In Huntington Beach would be most Interesting. f 14) Oao "Coastal Energy Impact Program" Report, i*ebrunry, 1990, City of Huntington% Beach, Section B-4.0. i 15) See Ouramli, Rotwt W., and David Llstokin, The Fiscal ImeEt Hand Ceentar for Urban Polio Research, Now Brunswick, NJ,T9713,pip. .- I U. 16) In this particular one, ?he term "prbllc goad" is defined by Chcrlees M. Tle►bout in "A Parrs: Theeary of local Expenditures", Journal of Political EconoIt 64, 19%, 41e-24, as follows. ''. . . a public good Is one�iw �( alliou FV_ �F uce7 for which there is no feasible method of chcrging th►e umem.11 (p. 417). This definition makes w"e In terms of the previous discunsian an "assignable" vs. "unassipnoblee" costs, If one reads It w. ".,.a Public: g ad W one which should be praiAvd, but for which there is no fea.,ible nWhod of rneasurirr each tow'e>s der;;ae 4." Sinm "assignable" costs carat thane which can be measured +accor N a "-u'rWs demand, then those which =newt be measured are "unamigtmble". Hmm, b r they a bove definition, untsWgnoble cents can be theovght of oar exprrrntitu:es for "p4bllc goo4s". 17) Sse OFIrr,l "rt can ft Dwelopmeexnt emd Application of a Land Use Fisaeol Impact Mettkwftlagy for the Clty of Huntington Beecwh" Vol. 1, November, 1979, prepared by Ultmoystomr Inca Irvine, CA. 18) '1"M welts thvt are letwated an the platforms offshore ore Included In t o total wm*eeed as all "unIW, This Is darns, because offshore all opwatlem roquire meeheore stpp►a l facilities that should be aeecoa+unteerd fear in the amalysls. Crw eeraeeornple Is es ar Alan facility Onshore than hr useJ for Urdeoft offshore production. (Another • e to the helipad located onsWee those they oil wrnponleers wo to earn an ftir offohcro ea>peerartlami. The extent of thue sorahme support a►ctivitles Is amurned to be reflect In the number of wells offshore. For this re+a on, the eoffshareer wells ere aoMw►t d as oMmmditure glrr'te sting all "units% 30 M. 1 Y 1: IELIOGRAPHY "Atieavft E:apen hues to Land Use Categories", Gaon M. Patterson, M,unleipol Finove 36, 1M W 1964, p4k 136-90 4' OC40 01 &cgs► Impact Pro9mm" Report, City of Huntington Beach, February, 1980. n igg oaf, f Enviranrnental lwli+Z, Edwin S. Mills, W.W. Norton Co., NY, 1973. a° "FIW Pet on the Dwelopment ant+ Application of a Land Use Fiscal Impact SMethodaioW . for tm city of Kmfington Beorh", Val. I, U1trasystems, Inc., Nwmn*er, 1979. hwt , Robert W. Burchail arod David L.istokIn, Center for Urban Policy h ew � �'; J, 1973. "A Pwo Theory of I ft-ai F.VoWitures,, r merles 11l!. Tlebrout, Jourml of Political E rrnY 64, p.p. 416,.24, 1956. "Wheire Eames the City Spend Its Money . George M. Patterson, Western City, September, 1963, p.a. 447. i Yy. 1 yr! r 1r f wiwr i Other Sources "Anal SudDet, I~isal Y*ar 1979-M", City of Huntir►gton Bemh. % rS1R"oldrnw"t StW, Huntington Beach Planning C,7►rrWtrnent, March, 1970. Policy Stu*t erwral Plan Smkground Report", Huntington Seoch Playing O"tOwnt, Oct, 4)raft Housing Elerwt, Hunfington loch Gwwral Flan", Department of Owelopne nt Septtr, 1979a 44wWng Met% t Bc dc9round Ropawt", Huntington Beoch Planning Deportment, August, 1976. "Lana Use !dement ArnerK n►*rA SO-i", Huntington Seach Department of Dowelopment Sem+r*,1, Janxry, 19W. i 'l��R�e, v��jE+ �iitur�es Analysis of �.aM Users", Huntington Beach Planning Depertnwnt, Oc , 1973. "1976 Rer+r~ enditure Analys:s of Land Uses", Huntington Beach planning Department, August, 1976. "Urban LaW Institute Paine! Advonce kit 211, Cliy of Huntington Brach, November, IY65. 41 i• ti S" r.P' •* 41WW ��4•'. � ��.�1}'tile, �� ' � 1 �4 r'4 i;li• ' 'r y u DEPARIAUT OF DEVELOPMENT T SERVICES Manning Divi iern June W. Qtalano, Deputy Direr w Alichael multari, !'3 m,.r Principal A.uthos Paul multari, Planing Inter Other Contributors Jeanine punk, Planner Alie*ad Aluttari, Flamer Spedud Amtsnae • Dan Bmvumv I3eod" S1►perrilm Cud*Curti,Arraditr Plwano- Rick Ccanbun,Hm ft"wdion Sped" v1Wd ho""Wg shwon word w"Ai , Wad Dior Cam Wlwtaatt W"a a avro wwit%mWWWW fePOW r1sal"SON" ` 114 y , '9 �,iy� ...�....-•ter-. _ _ __ 1 0 REQUES f FOR CITY COUt4CIL ACTION Date bZ .a !•►A r ,.21,r►-,,,19 R &Ibnittgato: Honorable mayor and City Council. �- ,s-( � 1 SubmittWby: Paul Cook, City Administratopror t ' by Mike Adams ,. Acting Director, Comn.urri t.y Dave1:^pmek Subject: APPEAL TO FLANNING COMMISSION ',, APPROVAL OF GONE CHANGE NO. 88-111USE PERMIT NO. 88•-25ISUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRON- MENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 88-1 AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. l3h -1 �- SPRINGSIELD 01L RECOVERY PROJECT Consistent with Council Policy? {� Yes { ) � �'� New Policy or Exception �� # I W — ��Ylw�.w..—fi..�—..�iW�� - r�4.V_- —_�y.nw,�/ w�•�.w_Y.�ra.w.� rl Stateawt of Issue, RetcommendeCon, Aaelysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attach 'fs',- BUTIR NT QE I SUB! appeals b, C�1uncilwomali Grace Transmitted for your cansidecat;.on �� r.c a � . �� . Winc:he'll and the Concerned Citizens For Runrington beach to the Planning C=mission ' s approval of 'Lone Change No 88--11 ,. Use Permit No. 88-25 , Supplemental Environmental Impact: report into . 88-1 and Environmental Impact Reports No . 86--1 . The zone change, use p!,rmit- and environmental impact reports are ontitlements tar the Springfield Oil Recovery Pro- ject which is proposed in the Oldtown SpeclfiC Plan - District 1 zoning di:.tr. i.ct: on two separal.e blocks north of Adams Avenue and Prest of Delaware Street . A MOTION WAS MADE BY SLATES AND SECONDED BY SILVA TO ADOPT AND CERTIFY SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO . 88--1 AND ADOPT AND RECERTIFY ENV'TRONKENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 86- 1 WITH STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE : AYPI;S: Slates, Silva , Leipzig , Bourguignon NOES: Liveiigood , Ortega ASSENT: None AUSTAIN : Higgins A NOTIOU WAS MADR BY SLATES AND SECONDED BY SILVA TO APPROVE 'BONE OH"09 NO. 88-111 AND USE PERMIT NO . 88-25 WITH FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS Or APPROVAL BY TfiE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES : Slates, Silva, Leipzig , Bourguignon 1#418: Livengood, Ortega ADNiT: None ABSTAIN: Higgins (See Attachment No. 1 for Findings and Conditions of Approval ) 1 at-of6cmangaf' obi : Staff recommends that the City Council deny the appeal and uphold the action of the Planning Commission by taking the following ection : a . Adept and certify an adequate Supplemental Environmentpl Impact Report No . 80 -1 and adopt and recertify as adequate Environmental I a t Report No . 86--1 by adopting City Coi)nc;i l Resolution No . with Statement of Overriding. Considerations . b . Approve Zone Change No . 88-11 with findings and adopt Ordinance Na. W and C . Approve Use Permit No . 88-25 i based on findings and conditions of approval and mitigation measures ` outlined in Attachment No . 1 with the following modif -led conditions : 8b . Prior to ,any oa-,,iite construction or, drilling , the niasonry wall and all landscaping and street improvements s:Yall be installed subject to the approval of the Department of Community Development and Department of Public Works . However , construction of vilue b.;,xes may begt.n after _otreet irnp rove met,t construction has commenced, 20 . Duringthe pre-drilling c.)_istrucition phase , all heavy truck �3 P � Y traffic shall be limited to the use of designated truck routes as approved by the Ike +a::t;metit: of Pub!:.(.� Works and in accord with the Circulation Element of the General Plan . All. t:eavy truck tratfic during the drilling and the operational phase of the project shall be limited to the fallowing streets between the 405 freeway an;J the site : Beach Boulevard , Adams Avenue and Delaware Street . For entrance tr.) the site only D�lawa.re Street, Springfield Avenue and California street may be used . 37 . Upon completion of all drilling operations , the drilling structure shall be reatolred from the site . Y : Angus petaoleixm Corp . 5772 Holes Ave . , Ste. 210 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 .1mel ►a : Councilwoman Grace Winchell Concerned Citizens For Huntington Beach ,son*** Oldtown Sr ecifis plan - District 2 - Oil airs] F1jW: Medium bensity Residential Acre&": 3 . 1 acres (bath blocks combined) Zone Change No. 50-11 is a request to rezone Block A (TracL 12747) and add the "01" suffix to allow the drilling of new oil wells . A4 A - 11/2 as -2- I{' 1 I �y 1 r present , both Blocks A and a are currently zoned to allots e:A8t :i71g oil operations . Block A requires the "01" suffix to permit: new ail W4118 , Use Permit No . 88-25 is a request to eat-sibliah a consolidated grill site and oil operation of, both blocks . They project is located within tre3 boundaries of the Oldtown Speci!- c Plen-District Z which is a mee3ium density residential. district: . Both Block It and B currently have the "0" suffix which permits existing oil weals , oil facilities and oil starage opepations . This project complies with they requirements of the Oldtown Spe A f is Plan- District 2 except for the exterior side yard :.:etrha ks . . the applicant is requesting a reduction of exterior sideyards from ten (10 ) Beet to a minimm of seven (•;; test . - cama s� xQ2�►a Draft Supplemental. Environmental. Impact Report (OSEIP) 88-1 was prepared to augment the analysis of the proposed >pring£:ield of i Rec,,very Project undertaken in Environmental Impact Report (EIR) 86- .1 . EIR 86-1 was ; t- ' PI . Published and c�er��f ied as a Final IZIt by the Planning Commission in September 3.986 , Suabaequent to the I:ortiflcat•ion of Final LIP 86-1 and approval of Zone Change No . 86...4 and Use permit No . 86-7 by the City Council. on October 20, 1986 , 1 i t:igatiun brought against t-he City and ANUS Petroleum Corporation %As Reol Party in Interest) by the Concerned Citizens of Huntington Beach., Tne , was settled by ar agreement dated May 9 , 1988 . .... part of the Settlement Agree:nent , the Ci Ly Council. ' s vote of October 20 , 1986 by which Final EIR 86-•1 was certified , was set a:5ide . On May 6 , 1,988 , new Project applications were filed with t:h3 City. Those applications are for Zone Change No . 88-•11 and Use Permit No . 88--25 . Following new project applications being filed with the City in May, 1988, the Department: of CoCnrnunity Development determined that a supplement `o the existing FIR (EIR 86-1 ) should be prepared and circulated in accordance with CEQA requirements . The City servea as the bead Agency for the CEQA review process as it did for the review proceeen for EIR 86-1. to accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) , Dosilt 08-1 and ItiR 86-1 has gone through the following public notification and review process : I . Notice of Preparation posted , advertised and circulated ,rung 1 , 1988 . 2 . Notice of Completion of DSEIR 88--1 and SIR 06-1 posted, advertised, and circulated August 23 , 1988 . 3 . Dom 86 -1 and SIP 66-1 are avai. :table foi public review arc] comment: August 23, 1988 - October 7, 1968 . XCA - 11/21/08 %TJF - � 1, 'i ;. ;A' t 4 . Copies 3! DSEIR 88-1 and EIR 86-1 forwarder) to Planning Commission and City Council menbers August 19, 1988 . S . Pub;llr, hearing before Planning -ommission to cert;fy MIR 88- 1 and recertify EIR 66-1 comments end responses regarding DSEIR 88--1 and EIR 86--1 w. t:re diastribvted to Planning Ce)mMisgion in their packets , with the exception of a letter presented to the Planning COMMission on OCtobzr IS after, public hearing, and are included as an appnnda,1: in tree Final EIR . 1. t U001ament a l .UXirbnM I1t a 1 lnY.i,XQnm*AtLJ .I Mg DBEIR 88•-1 and EIR 86-1 were preraxed t:u 2nalyxe tho potential impacts of the prcposed Oil Recovery Pi'(- i er.t-. . Tho r i r °r Counr_,i 1. , as the final dec,isionmaker on thy.: pr(c Je.�:t , adopt: and certify as, aCequate DSCIR 88-1 and adopt and z.-ecertlfy as adequr.te. FIR 86- 1 prior to final action on Xooe Change No . 68-11 and lls(� Per,-At No . 88•-18 , j i The environmental impact report discusses potential adverse impact.- in the area of 1) Top'.Jf.7T'r'Ip y, Soils acid Geol -)gy, 2 ) Hydr'rjoyy, Drainage and Water. Quality, 3 ) Bi.ologinil Resources .. i 4 ) Arc:haeological Resources , 5) Land Use, Zoning and General Mart, r) Aesthetics, Light and Glare, 7 ) TraffiC and Circulation , 8 ) Ai,: Quality, 9) Noise, .10) Riv'k of Upset , 11) Public Sarvic,es and lit iIit: ies , 12 ) Energy C-onservat:ion and 0 ) Cumulative ln,,Pacts . Through time use of appropriate mitigation measures i.(leret: i. fied in the � EIR ' s , the majority of the potentially adverse impacts i,- o iated, with the project: can be reclur..ed to a level of insigni,ficati^^ . There are three si►gnifirant adverst-� imparts ldEbnLif ied ir. the EIR ' s which cannot be con)plet:ely etl .rAnated, through Mitigation meastices . These impacts include : 1 . 6eismi�. ImRao In the event of ar. earthquake of 8 . 0 • magnitude r r g:-eate r . 21 Ifi. .tl. C = A1t:hau.rh mitigated with an 81 perimats!r w$11 and landscaping, 165 foot rigs will be clearly visible to residences for up to two years . A 30•-foot. high sound ba.:rier will also tempora:i ly impact the neighborhood. Tanks will be visible above the perimeter wally and landscaping _ These views cannot be eliminated . 3 . 11isks „gJ Upaab_ - jre ; The risk of radiant heat from are oil tank fire in rare--a 1 : 10, 000 to 1 , 1, 000 , 000 chance of happening in one year. The risk was calculated using a worst r case scenario with no perimeter- wall and no mitigat. :'_on . With a perimeter wall and facilities lowered to 6 feet below grade, potential impaots can be reduced but not tc an inuiclnificantr level . Y C fi Y1, K• IW 1. IML 1 fecause this project has been identified as having potentially signif ioant» adverse impacts which cannot be mitigated to a level, of insignifioonc e, the City Council is requirsd to make a statement of oarverrieiing considerations pricer to approval of the project . In this atatemont, the City council must find that the economic and social benefits of trio proposed project outweigh the project ' s potentially adverse impacts . A Statement, of overriding Considerations is attached to thin report . It should be noted that staff recommends adoption of all mitigation measures ouggested in the EIR ' s . Removal of any of t;,e recommended mitigation measures resulting in an alteration of the conclusions of the EIRI s would require recirculation of the document . R as t. A2 1 Att;eM: The ap�oal letters received by stuff (see Attachments 6 and 7) state that Supplenwntal Environmental 7tipact Report No . 88--1 (SEIR 88-1) and Environmental, Impact: Report No . 86-1 (EIR 86- 1) are inadequate and that the Mitigat"ion measurers do not offer the existing neighborhood adequate protection from a proposed industrial use in close proximity to residential lard use . Further, the appeal letter from. the Concerned Citizen for Huntington Beach states that individial citizen-1C t owners have evexy right to enforce the Covenants , Conditionh and T:erstrictions recorded oa their tract . The Springfield Oil Reecove"y p :o j ect will result in a degradation of their residential neighborhood and that the total number of conditions will never be *,nti.reiy complied with or enforced by the City. The following discussion addresses Councilwoman Winchell ' s appeal : As listed previously ;.n this report , 13 separate gat e�+aori of inpacts were discussed at length in FIR 86-1 and DBEIR 88-1 . The Exit' a address potentially significant adverse environmental impacts associated with the project, identify those impacts w:aich can be reduced to a level of insignificance through mitigation measures, specify those mitigation, measures and, fine'ily, identify those impacts Which cannot be reduced to a level of insignificance . The EIR' s provide mitigation rmearurees which address neighborhood environmental concerns . � Th3 proposed springfieeld Cil Recovery Project will. conso].ldat... approximately 31 scattered, anticipated oil wells and tank facilities into one state-of-the art produc`ion facility . it is staff ' s conclusion that removal of the existing anticipated facilities and replacement: of them with state-of--the art , safety designed facilities will result in the improved safety and general welfare of the neighborhood. The following is an item-by-item response to the Concerned Citizens ' for Huntington Beach appeal.: RCA - 11/ 2 t/88 ( 1569d) ,rite MAW { 1• A. ►-M- SIR g the- Uicatlas t a;deauataly pr2tact t a ldantial The VVit 0 lasing and completion of both MIR 88-1 ind SIR 86 -1 have lxien in compliance with California Xr.v►i remmental Qual,i.tlr Act Ou: delin,es . Thirteen categories of impacts 4ad teen altemitivem were analyzad within the documents , and over fifty mitigal:ion nwasures suggested . The majority 'of potentially adverva environmental impacts were reduced , through mitigation measurars, to a level of insignificance . There significant unavoi labl.e adv'arse impacts were ident i f?,,ed . • . In 1986, EIR 86-1 was certified and adopted .as adsquate by both the Planning Convnistsion and the City Cou.ncia . On October 18 , 1988 , the current Planning Commission aeloptiad and recertified EIR 86-3, anf+ adopted and certified as adequate D;3EIR 88-1 . It is staft ' s conclusion that EIR 86-1 and DSHIR 88--t are adequate and tl;at the basic purposes of the California Lrn,riro»trental Quality Art are served through them, d . The....I M i ty of the, , ... :L fli u s t r..W use t h a t do_.. ...'tQ M tQ -the General" A• stated in Zane Change No. 88-11 , finding number 2 .c . '"A General Plan Amendment is not required because the combined acreage of the proposed site is less that 20 acres as set forth in +he Size Criteria for Determining Land Use Designations table contained in the General Plan. " The City' s General Plan seta for minimum size areas for various land use designations which establish threshold values for the necessity for General Plan Amendments . The combined acreage of 3 . 1 acres for the proposed oil recovery site is substantially less then 20 acres; therefore, a General. Plan Amendment is not required . Also, the General Plan/Zoning consistency matrii: identifies that the "01" suffix is consistent with medium density residential land use designations and zoning diiatricts . C,'omblsn;nq the "01" suffix with the Oldt:own Specific Dian -• District 2 zoning district is consistent with tAe General Plan. The "dl" suffix allows for tho 'illing of new wells and the operation of oil production within the wi.ty. Angus Petroleum Corporation is requesting a zone change on Block A (Tract 12747) in order to consolidate approximately 33 existing scattered wells within the immediate area . RCA - 11/21/68 •+6- ( 1589d) Al Treat. Y' Wed an an inter•-department communication from the City Attern ° �lffic•a to the Planning Division dated Augur, 26 , Xlll a applicant has the right to pursue their petition for h aono chevqo and use permit for the required entitlements to Initiate the dxillinf of new wells and the construction of the 6prringfield Oil Recovery project. D. Tha gitjAena fird ball1cl aulalilctad to the dgRXAdgtJ-gML_of thgir The applicant is attempting to consolidate approximately 31 8oatterod oil operations into a consolidated site . The oil production Facilities already exist .in the vicinity of the propose! 2 block site . In terms of fire safety and multiple .and use impacts, staff supports the oil consolidation project . The mitigation measures included in SEIR 88-1 and EIR � f 86-1 and the Conditions -of Approval required by Use Permit No . 88-25 will provide safety and land use measures which will prevent the degradation of the existing residential neighborhood. After the initial construction and two year drilling phane, the operation will become a passive operation with the occasional maintenance of the wells . There are existing sit•as within the City where there are multiple well operations with storaVe facilities which are adjacsut to residential. areas . X • The AZ nX .fJ2 cored L gn—the 1211 d€ili"g hermits wi 11. never . ent J 1klY MMt or ,enforced -aii . ,aSt: R ,tie .fit th tha 09211CAnt , AngL L- Oil .. has a 1roady 2royen .tg tllg. Cgncerncd Citialtna fog., Muntillat!.fin . Aeach.. With the inclusion of the suggested mitigation measures as Conditions of approval for the proposed project , the applicant is required by low to comply with the conditions . In addition, the recant passage of Assembly R111 3180 by the California Logislature 7eq'uires that public agencies adopt a reporting and monitoring program for adopted measures designed to avoid significant environmental impacts . As well as bei.nq a requirement , it is the intent of the City of Huntington Beach and the purpose of the City' s Code Enforcement Division to enforce adopted conditions of approval . KZIRQ_ EM.ITAIRS SEIR 38-3 was prepared as a supplement to the prev' ously prepared EIR 86-1 which were prepared to assess the environmental impacts relative to Zone Change N'�) . 88-11 and Use Kermit; No . 88-25 . SEIR 88-1 and EIR 86-1 represent a detailed analysis of the project, project-related impacts* alternatives and mitigation measures intended to minimize a6verse environmental impacts . Prior to any CA - 11/21/88 -7- (1589d) ; 1A too rot194 on SOM Change No. 88-11 and Us* PaMrmit eta. 88'251 it is tom+ O-S888T that the. City 000Unci 1 Certify as adequate SWR 88-1 and SIR $8-I* All suggested mitigation measures rec*mmandsd in BRYR 88-1 arA 213t 86- 2 beve been incorporated into conditions of approval . 04 00t0b,69 18, 1904o the Planning Commission approved and t040=004ad to the City Council certification of 8El'R 88-1 and r*aortification of Rig 86- 1 . ti . 1 Not applicable. , i The City Council may overturn the Planning Commission' s decision and i deny Zone Change No. 88-1.1 and Use Permit No . 89-25 with findings , , 1 . City Council. Resolution No. �` which includes Statement of a Overriding Considerations f 2 • Final SEIR 88-1 and EIR 86-1 3 . Planning Comm'.sasiorr 'Resolution No. 1.407 with Statement of Overriding) Considerations 4 . Findings and Conditions of Approval for Zone Change No . 88-11 t, and Ve0 Pe mit 190. 88-25 as approved by Planning Commission on October 18 ,, 1988 . 5 . tone Change Ordinance No . 1M .4. Appeal letter from concerned Citizens for Huntington Beach �41 dated October 26, 1988 . ..7 . Appeal letter from Councilwoman Czace Winchell dated October 27, 1988 . -8 . Draft Minutes from October 18 , 1988 Planning Commission meeting . -A . Planning Commission Staff Report for DSEZR 88--1 and EIR 86}-1 I dated October 18 , 1988 •40 . Plaann nq Coanniasion Staff Report for ZC 86-11/11P 88•-25 dated October 16 1988 . MA:RLF ; g bm ' I 4 1 ,1 II i RCA - 11/21/88 -8 ( 1589d� r �y • 1 N aftuno el"s 7.9,018 Ito Piero OT011 BEA0#1 1Mr.Cn% w��tt� 0110 9 Alsur a Lane Huntington eeach, CA 92646 October 26, 1988 Root 4blo Mayor John Eraktae C/0 City Cleric, Connie Brockway P.U. Box 190 , Huntington Beach, CA 92648 dear Mayor Erskine: BE: Planning Commission Deciaiona on the 1 Springfield 011 Recovery Project, October 18th Concerned Citizena For Huntington Beach, a non-profit ecrporation, wishes to appeal the following decisions: C-4a - To adopt and certify as adequate Supplemental Snvircnpental Impact Report No, 88-1 and EIR No. 86•-1 by adopting Aesolutlon No. 1402 with Statement of Overriding Considerations. C-4b - (1) Approve and recommend that the City Council Adopt Zone Change No, 88-11. (2) , Approve Use Perm1t No. 88-25 , 't. Concerned Citizens are appealing for the following reasons: A. The accepted SSIR' a are inadequate, for all reasons stated in our prior letters and our consultants, The Chambers Group. H. The intenalty of the oil operation la an industrial use that does not conform With the Goneral Plan. C. IrAivldual citlzea -lot owners have evepy right to enforce their CQH's recorded February 21 , 1978 in Official Record of Orengo County. U. The citizens are boLng subjected to the degradation of their residential neighborhood by industrial tines. E. The 57 or 60 conditions for oil drilling permits will never be entirely met or entirely enforced as past experiences with the applicant, Angus 01: , has already proved to us. We will appreciate your kind and fair attentiona to our appeal. Very Truly youurrs, fJ 7Na; MPa . j rer 1 6 R d Abramstart' ee e, cc: John Murdock, Attc,rney CONCERNSU 17I1'IZENS FOR John Weatertater, CItAMBERS GROUP hUNTTN6T0H BEACH P w� ' y�', r� I� 'ti�' I �` n A'�f[:�Cr �f 1�� at�•M�� j ' 7 7'I,,.y , .4, r -1- ti.i•r r r nYM, rrrF"., Pl.Ty,/ '� Y 19 �,y 'S,'Rh I, •,4•T�.�.. +. x' , , ` 7. a�•!'+t4y�,+ ► 1 .h• ,br:ti'� ,L;ry t�Y ',',r` � - ,..,1�'f'� .t ' •a •�4. v+�, i .d i V,. r /l r�r�. r. ilt ';' r s*hny'' 11 4':' Cowell ■�ow/Y■■ . y� . •, .1' / � r , 1•� •a r +, r,r,. nip lCIC p R p �C �• �,, ,. . �ternbers A C way, City Cleric � Ctuncilwo�a�s�i SUBJECT ., APPEAL OF OATS PLANNING COMMISSION October 27, �199:8 ACTION ON FJR 89 4, ZC 88-11, AND UP $8-25 f + I heWhy request a pubhe hearing before the City Council of the abase applications. I �ll� a the PlanninE Commissionts certification of EIR 8&"4, Zone Change No. 88�-11, Else Permit No. 88.2S for the following reasolvi: The mitigation measures identified in the Environfinental Impact Report and related x conditions on the Use Permit do not offer the near borhood adequate address all of the concerns � � protection or presented with an exfgnded industrial use project in in established residential neighborhood. 1 S48d �, ' GW:ss or) rM M Y LP i r J•J 1.1�''�''� i �� Y l ,i4• '�, r" � 1 c1r ms v ! M Y A. . I Wd. 1013 121% 472-49 UV g8 C1N OF HUNTINCT()N 13EACH C!TY COUNCIL OFFICE ,.. � Aof Iti/a*or� CA, 9z 640 .,1�,�3'+� /��.�'+t.�r` 'T.�Y.r rr}T ."7,�� •C.�L�r�>� 11�/�C`7inC�:� Izt/�• r� fr"�..� [fir= �✓�•��.Miter, %v �P1��7" OA Celt. -OAWJ '0,04fOArr. IAML A14=0 Rb rV T^Vo%W. • /"r�J1/i %.+rr /�►{ �/E.. J --r r'l�--� ��'�iit�d� '3,r!�C�,` �'�,�� d�/'��'%��..�- �i7`.4/ I�.•[i�"t�+ "SI' i�S�OT.�st�c„r, %� -Moonr iitoaAffc-= ix :5c..* P"4A9 xP 49Y 4m?;k4 ve �oocooe• f. =.,� 'Try-1 i..�' ��+ t.7 �;Ac�i/�roR�b�� c..'oe i !� r •� ��t�-r ,�, � sua e" N. Bundy Dfly. Lom Anp.lm, Callum 9W49 f , i PvSNti1► AQrM7ti�rF*AII of �H 1i. ,. P�bl� eC1R* al the Sa01wol Cooil bt Oranpsintlad�np ounly, wrto�r A-4214, ogled 20 SdpieMbier, 19e1, and J3TAY11 OF OALIFORNIA County of Orange Pow mom A"~ �� I � �» .ate two M W4 Con~mom +' I sm a Citizen 3f the United Stella and a resident of that County aforesaid. (ar1~ over the aqe of eighteen ' years, and not a parity to or interested in the below 1;- C*harnli; rdr klrprNatla+, .I!. v mow•- r, 1 entitled rri!411er. I am a1 principal Clerk of the pranQd H o � U11lipn for ; VON; 'qFA0 1 ..oast DAILY PILOT, with which is combined the ON: st"r W ') MM e w;tw� blooirp f�N 1 •►r �► NEWS-PRESS, a newspaper of general circulation, wt awronl 01111111111104. 1 .,r Printed •l1d publisxh8d 1n the City of Costa Mesa, *; rout .14747kI ail P , b1i�rin011sld Av ,e :,. .•, ...yr�;� County of Orange, State of California, and that a rrir a aawrarte•marestj :mt Notice of RMbJJC HAArIng divan it h Meat i 1174ek b AV01i 'C ;- t gnto •At. ��•••�--�••-- ---- enw, Call orris telrsst — — 8�Inplldld8*rlud and of which copy attached hereto is a true and complete '/C" POSAL: Iona � copy. vies printed and published in the Costa Mesa, '�74 T"o Huntington S c Fountain Valle •�FrelNes 10T- ., to Newport Eleazh, Beach, y, 1►lotokho "t '0 aw Irvine, the South Coast communities and Laguna Oft'nn oT-2 beach issues of said newspaper for our, ( 1 ) qqw'1 � t0 dr+�'MoP M'l consecutive weeks to wit the issue(s) of 11t0oitaAMlna daWORSSf *0 Ri C IIQ�ICE• tst W A as e.;»N ro 8 ilOFi � ' tr"to 011 1M to M Novserahsx I•.Q _•_. 198—_._ ; s rnerrr ervsn (7)Mssl f ttr nartlt•im sowlt. �, .. al both tltbells. .,, Go �Cldr111�W;Im i1w1At 62—V17 , 1 Mdop4rn i d xstls plsaor 19�9_ ". ,,�, , Parrwl Na d W .---•—.-�. - -- _ . . r. p►'o�Nd snd rraablrrrnr�wra �; ;,,� • all .: • • tsl•.i�nrrltartrnerrtpe�ali _�,,.,�„ 198 - �', .";, i .: n"Na fig•/� fEr~I EiNY11tONMENTAL STATUS:Th+ft 4vAg is MOT,all ,1 ,: HMt f! y r4WAM Ic -• t r age- Atll�l/ t. �N ri Oatn- N0�� rr� 1 declare, under penalty of perjury, that the rirO1r111n1si.wt •IMIi1t N0.W1 Vft s to foregoing is true sand correct. ;m" wr��c e"00 ft.86-11 and UW Nov b 9 �� ' P�N a8•gb, y of the 8 �dp Ex,%cuted on �_ em _x 1 ;'198 .�...� e r uA+a. �. 01*40siltla0f at COS cow Mesa Ca�lifa ia. a�taw• �y1t soon st«i, lam+ , I+�r++TM � cdiifoornle t§M to►I TIME:T.'"PM;1••i�`, CL Womm+INTEWSYW PER.! SignSture SUBJECT: ..Ap sal to SOM " WOW to .tlend me-11149 ler a �� • NO oowwe he or P*� ,sxprese o P _I , No. for erg 1hM�psprAodrsr`wtpAs ' as w+Mf�Ad 0ebow.1 AM aapM• t' f� M '' osNorN►. a f, .04 deeN• � an with trig CA1oe at � tlN.Clh►;.Cwk..,IM Mon r �M •iL� ;.4 +C:+A' $111s1. Mh+rsholM• 2el ';. 1 PROOF OF PUBLICATION r 11 •r:r�t� i�r�hlr� � �� . l 4 1 hr1 1 �r i A. F F fd. � ",re �' �i"1 t ! rrl uu�N r1,'� rt 1 i d MY� if r, '. Y � rt 4 + yy• ,., 1 4.0 t f� ° ' � d 'f' .L r fr- ! �'JL�'�2 cry.; '. • •r U # ,, ir.Y ,ff, Y., •�,�r4,� '"' � ,. T 'r''.� �w r r•• r r ra,`M r v/ 7"; ;1 ' Sy, T t ,�vll-T•"' r4 +RS!F�7," K';�!'r'!G 1.1�.!,•;,r�M;�.�T J. 'Y" !�•ifSl,�i •.E,A,'- t; ...'�, �'..,- :r ,1-n,r . . Is ".I�..:r 'a. . i bIiah Nov. 10, 1988 1 1 CaWrA, t8 'Impeot Report . 88-1 =yys � i act *0 apt 61-1 h , , 1 /� �7 " �ih overt �to ject) f ICR to K91X3Y GIM that the Huntington Reach City Council will hold a public betting in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic tutor, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California# on the � dote abd at the time indicated below to receive, and consider the ;otemoots of all persons Oho wish to be heard relative to the r i1py lication described below. Monday, November 21. 1988 7: 00 PM r 4V : A pool to Planning Commission' s Approval of Zane bl�ge . No . 68-11/ttse Permit No. 88-25/Supplemental viroaoentai rmpact Report no. 8.8-1 and "*ito"total impact deport not 86-1 h Anon* Potroleum Corporation Ago 1 . 'Iouncfilwroman Grace Wincheil 1 2 . Concernetd Citizens For Huntington Beach The project site consists of two blocks located on opPoeite corners as fellows (See attached ,nap) : 11112ck_ .[Jra___ct 1.2 bounde4 by 13pringf ield Avenue, Delaware Street, Rochester Avenue and s California Street; and E� t (Zs.et .227JAX: bounded by Toronto Avenue, %Utornia Street, Springfield Avenue and Huntington Rezone Block A *Tract 1274 7) from "Oldtwrn Specific Man-Vistrict Two-Oil Facilities ((Yr-2-0) " to "Oldtown Specific Plan-District Two-Oil "4 Facilitioa with tail Orilling(OT-2-01) " to allow the drilling of new oil wells . use;-._Perwnit : To develop are oil consolidation drillsite on Block A and associated oil facility on Block S.• Also requested is a reduction of exterior sideyard setbacks from ten (10) feet to a minimum seven (7) feet for the north and south elevations of !both blocks . ( 1150d-13) 1 w ��LPL.' _'.•. ' r � r r ,�!,'I },''' .4r1,, .n,•,wp6'.eWS il,"!�4!4 ; ir, r .yv ya' . . Af,. r M rr OF IC Hulk 11O �COW r onbor 14# 1040 the Planning commission a proved A m ddoption of bona Chan* go* L1 , I rat r d VAN un . 88-2S and apikov� asr Gott*tICati�an of i�UPPxesaAl►#atal ,,1,,, Xbnmsdtel f act Report No. 68-1 and vIt.onmentai impact teport tea. 86-1 frith a Statement of Overriding Considerations 0.1 The city Council is required to certify as adequate 8uppiemntal Environmental Impact Report No . 88-1 and recertify Envir tonmental Impact Report No . 86•-1 with a Statement of Overriding Considerations prior to any action on Zane Change No. 80-11 and bee Permit No. 88-25 . .r A copy of the proposed request is on file in the blip*rtmeat of Comounity Development , 2000 Nevin r5trpmt , Huntiri tors Beach, California 926480 for Inspection t7 �he public. 1 ' W&LINTS"STSD M13098 are ipaited to attipnd said hearing and /I�mrof9s 106na 6V, s omit v ►iounce for off: against the application jl au�1i libovei V1 applications , ezhWtst and dedcri Lions of pia p��rowasai s,rm eA file with the Office of the 61ty Clark, 2000 'ain street, Huotiington ftach, California, for inspection by the public . BUNTINGTON BRACH CITY COUNCIL By: Connie Brockway City Clark Phone (714) 536-5227 Dated Nov. Q, 1938 (1150d-14 ) %.OL- W %ow 3 C4 - 4 - EL: I Kij�j- CF-C ° w RAR2 c2 • ► CF—E-Ca R2-0 R2 R2 CF-Ew lit = ' Rr�e•si t i � Jr T 1RZ-O If=-Q •i` CIM CF-P R� Ott -cQ-o , - a I o 1 R2 4 t _ RI Al R! At J1..• Rr ram! ^4�� R1'-G R III R 1 1 fl-1 f Re n�.rr scnoN + 1 -p -� tfltR�ltT 21 > �•� t III m: at M Ai R � I CF-Eone le"Wh JUL fit J '* 1 a� ,• R1 RI F JPL z42 d2 ,�., ..�, �y - coiD I/Upcpu v HUMMGTO" BEACH ftANMROG DIVIRON r: :{t 7E t'. r 1 '� 1,yi.Y,P }•rJ ''1'5 r rl ' I • AI�iYr�} AN 41 9W MOM �; },, Ala 1 •r, �� .� w• 'R r , INUMMARTMEMY COAMUNlICATION ,{ OO� N toCKWAx Pr+em AR^cHc1R J , 1r0LG1SR ' � 4 City Clerk Acting City Attorney yw ;fact Notification at the Public Date November 10, 1988 r on : Code Amndment 88�3A; +and Code Amendment 88-25 ,r T have examined tho notification process une •ire each of the above matters and find that there is compliance with state and substantial compliance with city dodes and diroctives . 4 y Thin matter can , therefore, be held on the scheduled date of the City Council without further notification. . I ARTHUR J . FOLGER ! ' Acting City Attorney AJF/6j e iM• :1' r•, � ' rid��r k' .` r. •t!Rr"\ �'�,`r r !r.'['��'� 1r.rr 1' ' . ,j' . r huntingtor: beach department of community devolapment VolT ff flit 1r ;anA *g Cdti�►�riee Development r, CiA'x'Rs October 1s, 1988 BUIURCTs D M►W So PP3,RNN'i'AL XVV I R01=N?AL IMPACT REPORT NO . 8 @--1 AND SWINOWWNTAL IMPACT RRPORT NO. 86-1 FOR TOR PROPOSZO SPRINGFIRLD OIL RECOVERY PROJZCT' ( IN co 208 WITH SONS CURGE NO. 88-11 AND USE PER141T . 88 -25) ! Angus Petroleum 8712 Sol$$ Avenue, Suite 210 Huntingtatl "aCh, CA 92646 gam: Review and take action on Draft Supplement&A Environmental 10pact Report No . 88-1 and Snvironmental invact kopoart ft, 86-1 (Certified in September 1986) ' . 11 .CAI' : i Adopt and certify as adequate Draft: Supplemental 1+:nvi ronmental Impact Ropoxt N. O. 88-1 (DSEIR 88-1) and adopt and recertify Rnvi ronmentol 10pact Report No. 86-1 (EIR 86-1) adapting attached Planning .Commission Reeolutian No. 1407 with Statement of Overriding � Considerations . DORIS e8-1 was prepared to augment the analysis of the propomed Springfield Oil Recovery Project undertaken in EIR 86-1 . I 1911 66-�1 was published and certified an a Final EIR by the Planning Cewiisoldn in September 1986 . Subsequent to the certification of F1441 ,EIb 06--1 and approval of Zone Changes No. 86-4 and use permit'. No. 66-7 by the 'Ci.ty, Covn. cil on October 20 , 1986, litigation brought against the Citr and ARGUE estroleum Corporation (AS Real Pasty in Interest) by the Concerned Citizens of Huntington Beach, Inc . was settled by an agreement dated May 9 , +988 . As part of the Settlement Agreement , the City Councii ' s vote of October 20, 1986 by which Final EIR 36-1 was certified, was set: aside. OA Xay 6, 1988, new project applications were filed with the City. Those applications are for Zane Change No . 88-11 and Use Permit No. LA A4M434 r. w maw r' IIt #8-1 and Bit 86-1, once certified _ ( recertified ,,. fires t M�rly, are intended to be utili xed for the aforementioned 4i#c r*tionary actions. f r ; allfgr 1 yiroaMnt1a�..11Qua1itit..Pros„- east Following new project applications being fixed with the City in May, f . 1988, the Department of Community Development determined that a supplement to the azisting SIR (EIR 86-1) should be prepared and circulated in accordance with CEGA requirements . The City serves as the Load Agency for the CEQA review process an it slid for the review process for SIR 88•-1. A supplement to an EIR may be orepared when "only minor additions or changes would be necessary to make the previous EIR adequately apply to the project in the changed situation . " (Guidelines 15163 (a) (2)) . A supplement may be ciroulaited by itself, with,-)ut r6circulating the previous EIR . (Id. at Section 15163 (d) ) . In order to assure the fullest review by both Responsible Agencies and the public, however, the City recirculated both the 8upplemmnt and ptevlous E19 86-1. I to sawrdanco with, the California Environmental Quality Act (CE0A) , c; D*2= 88-1 sad EIR 86-1 has gone' through the following public. notification and review procoss : i 1 . Notice of Preparation pont'ede advertised and circulated L7una lose . ) Z . Notice of Completion of DSEIR 88--1 ind EIR 86-1 posted, advertined, and circulated August 23 , 1988. .'. + 3 . DOEIR 88-1 and EIR 86-1 are :evailable for public review and comment August 23, 1988 w October 7# 1988. 4 . Copies of DSEIR 88-1 and- SIR 86-1 forwarded to Planning Co;aaisaion and city Council members August 19 , 1988 . 5 . Initial commnts on DSEIR $8-1 and EIR 86-11 forwarded to Plarnning ComMission at Study Session for Argue Project on bckober 4 , 1988 . DSEIR 88-1 and SIR 86-1 identify saveral impacts from the proposed project which :mart be mitigated to a level of insignificance through the mitigation measures included in this staff report . ,�1 F X ADYER£E I VACTS ; Both EIRs identified three: significant: adverse impacts which could not to mi-igated to an insignificant love] . A grief discussion of these impacts follows : ---staff iteport - 10/10/88 7 � 6 "rlp�' '•r ri 41 ,! r 1 1 1 1 Ril ,o f rU1218atK I SIR Risks associated with the project include release or ignition of flammable liquids stored on site, oil spills , impacts from hazardous chemicals , and gas leaks . All risk aan be mitigated to an insignificant level except the chance that a fire could result in radiant heat affecting the area surrounding the project . The $11 quentif ion the risk of radiant heat from an rail tank fire as "rare" or as 1: 10, 000 to 1 .• 1 , 000 . 000 chance of happening in one year . This risk was calculated using a worst case scenario with no perimeter :'Jall and no miLi.gation measures . The radiant heat hazard footprint will be stignificantly reduced b;! lowering facilities to 6 ' below grade, building an 8 ' perimeter wall and keeping on-'sites storage of oil it a minimum level . Although the possibility of a fire will be reduced to a very rare statistical level it can not be totally eliminated so is being listed as a significant unavoidable adverse impact . It should be noted, however, that the risk of upset associated with the proposed project is less than that associated with the existing oil facilities around the project area which will be eliminated as part of the proposed project . ;�,�.iamic IM2=tA No significant un*voidable adverse impacts are anticipated with regard to topography, sails , or geology except in the event of an earthquake of 8 .0 magnitude or greater in the area . All the mitigation measures proposed wi11 minimizes the risks of an event of this magnitude however adverse impacts the surrounding area can not be overlooked. �A*sth*ti'calxy, the project itself will be an improvement to the J*J#hborhood over existing conditions . However, come &spect:s of the construction phaae and maintenance will create unsightly nuisances . Although mitigated with an d • perimeter gall and maf.ure landscaping , 163 ' rigs gill he clearly visible directly adjacent to residences for Op to two years . Also impacting the surrounding neighborhood will he a twWorary 309 high sound barrier at the property line . Tanks will b* visible above the perimeter pull ared landscaping on the facilities site. These views can not be eliminated . impacts from light: and glare will be mitigated to an Insignificant level. no flood lighting will b!r used. All lights wrili be low profile and directed to equipment areas only. Less light will be vie.ible than frona a residential fro j ect . The following are areas c&41 general concern where impacts have been noted but have been reduced -to insignificant levels through mitigation measures , Alternatives to the proposed project are discussed as well . Staff Report - 10/18/88 -3- (1.4550) Oil SEWS Where is a potential for oil spills from the pipes, valves , W-tings, t8nkra and equipment . To adequately mitigate this, all now materials c will be used and protected against corrosion . The drill site and the facilities sits wi 11 W designed in such a tray to provide total containment of al .. fluids in the evert of a spill . Any surfa.e water ` from a rainatoxc+ coming in contact with a spill will be diverted to ca.tah. basins and filtered for rei.nsp6ction. .. The only chemicals to be usA4 are those normally used in oil operations and none would be used in large quantities . Xf a spill should Occur, it would be contained in the area and no impact would occur outside the project area . Risk of Ugget -- Gas LeBIiS F Although there .in a change that gas locks could occur at old abandonments upon repressurization of the reseveir , diligent monitoring should prevIude the risk . The project will actually lessen the possibility of gas tl,viku by providing open producing wells which serve as low pressure areas for the release of gas . A contingency plan has been filed with the Huntington Beach Fire Department which will be implemented should any leaks occur. During the drilling phase, there will be an increase in traffic impacte, around the project area . An average of 3 heavy vehicle trips are anticipated over the .perlod. Impacts will be heaviest during the nine month construction phase . . During the production/injection phasie theirs wilt not be ypro'je^t-related Increase in traffic in the nei AborUod � To mitigate traffic impacts to an insignificant level truck traffic wz-11 be restricted to the hours of 7 : 00 AM to 5: 00 PM sOaen ddlrs per week during the drilling phase and six days per week during the coattructi.on phase . 1 •I poise from the ptoporsed project , particularly, during the drilling phaser is of prime concern to the City and residents who live near the site, _ A noise study ,was conducted as part of the OSEIR 83-1 and EIR 86-1 and it discusses at length the existing noise environment and the projected noise impacts resulting from the proposed oil recovery project . Staff Report -- 10/ 1WO/80 �4 - rl fir, c�l Existing noise levels in the area are a result of traffic or nearby roadwayti and the existing oil production operations . Currently there are 40 wells seattered throughout the project areh. Each of these wells constitute a minor source of noise impacting its immediate surrounding . With the project these wells will be consolidated onto the two project sites . The final result: is that through touch of the prc iect area, the noise levels will be lower . In the immediate vicinity of,.thq project sites, the noire levels will increase but with proper mitigation measuros incorporated into the project design, the ' resulting noise levels will still be within the Huntington Beach F. Noire Ordinance. No s4y9nif#cant noise impacts are anticipated to result from thq pruposud project . :. The site plan for the project shows that the distance from the drilling rigs to the nearest residences will be approximately 105 feet . The worse ease noise levels at there residences for each type of drilling rig ate given in Table 1 . Fables 2 and show the City` s Noise Ordinance Standards for comparison with projected drilling noire levels . I, The date in Table 1 show that in. ordwr for the drilling operation to satisfy the Huntington Reach Noise 0►r.tlinance outdoor standards electric motors with acoustic blankarte must be used. The 'proposed ,project will use only electric motors with acoustic blankets,. Acoustic blankets' as well as the pvoposed 6-foot masonry wall along tho ,kite perimeter ure predicted to redlines the noise levels to below the guise Ordinance limits . There are currently 4 number of pumps operating at the site, and the project will increase their number . The Vk6ject calls for installing submerged pumps for all wells , however. with the submerged pumps , noise from oil ;pining should decrease. Occasionally wells will need _ to, bar, pukled, nervfced, and repaired. Due to proximity, of the nearest re8 derides to the malls , the Oil Code requires that for any radrilling r .� t .,A.Jght, soundproof ix�.�;will. be provided. The Cti.J Goye. prohibit* the pulling of wells d�xriep the nighttime houis ( 10 p .m. to yr1�1' � � •.M. ' . rr�l AA6 wilth: J;ill*46tttgat10n measures provided in the DSZX1 and gilt, the ?� 8091 cent has agreed to a noise monitoring program to ensure oeapliance with the City, s noise ordinance . This treasure should be ncludod by the '#leaning Commission as an additional mitigation �;Y aas: ,t•a fog h' ,-Pjeat . t Moire M0e4t69409 shall be conducted under the supervision of an scouotit'gl engineer cartified by the' , County of Orange. Reports shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development within three working days .after completion of each phase of the monitoring effort . The monitoring shall include the following : Staff Report 10/18/8e -5- ( 1455d) n '.1 � r ij 1 l TABLE 1 E Maintenance Drilling Operation Noise Levels at the Nearest ReGidences IF M61sa Level ,�. rim.#.jbiar flit BE Rita Thy.Ri ae EW R n 01ria1 70.0 d8A .0 daA 74.8 dM 76.0 daA '.r M611 1, with acoustic blAekct 54.0 d8A 57.0 d6A Ira-a da 60.0 MA i Pectric, with acoustic blanket 33.5 AA 36.5 dM 38.3 d0A 39.5 d1 j TAIL$ Z Huntington Beach Outdoor Noise Ordinance Standards i Noise Level Not Maximum Allowable to bo. Zx .otd_ Durilto1L f EX-afle3iInce a .m. to del 30 minutes/hour 60 OSA 15 minutes/hour 65 d8A 5 minutes/hour 70 dBA 3 minute/hour. 7 am any- peritI'd of time so dAA 30 minutes/hour tip, 6 15 minUtes/hour 60 ddA 5 minutes/hour 65 d9A 1 minut4/hour 70 d lA For any period of time TABLE 3 I Mit:ntinvton Beach Indoor Void* Ordinance Standards ftihi# Level pot Maximum Allowable . f 5 ' IA 5 minutes/hour 0o d2A 1 minute/hour 65 d3A For any period of time I. ell. 45 413A 5 minutes/hour 5q d18A I minute/hour 55 d8A For any period of time Staff Report W 10/18/88 -6r, (1455d) c' 1 a . Pri-.drillingobagMnitogina . Prior to the start of the drilling phase, noise measurements shall be obtained during the operation of the specific drilling rig which lies been selected and the measurements shall be rolated to those which will be experienced at thi3 nearest residential boundaries to the drilling site. in addition, the noise contrc; ; rioasures which have been (or will be) applied to the rig as nw::ded for compliance with. the City of Huntington Reach Noise Ordinance shall be identified. b. LIUM. Noise measuremnts shall be obtained during the nighttime hours (10 p.m, to 7 :00 a.m. ) for at :east six ,a hours on each of three, nights within the five day period from the start of the drilling phase. Monitoring is to occur at the ' nearest residential boundary, to the, actual drilling operation . The noise level data shall be compared to those specified in the City of Huntington Beach noise drdinanco. Whore an exceadence of the Ordinance is identified, noise control manures shall be applied and are additional two nights of monitoring shall be required . c . Quglng tha, arillinaate. . Noise monitoring shall occur during a six-hour period between the hours fro6V- l0, ,p:m. to 7 a .m. 'wt least one each month during the Drilling Phase of the project . The noise level data obtained shall be compered to the City of i Huntington Reach Eloise Ordinance standards . Where are esceedence of the standards is identified, noise control measures shall be applied and an additional two nights of monitoring shall be - required . As regte.ired , by Section 15126(d) pf the CLQA Guidelines, alternatives to the proposed project are discussed in both 8IR 86-1 and DRRIR 84-1 . ,� . DRRI$ $84 , ten alternatives to the proposed pro' ject . addition to the "no project" alternative, tma,; revisiona to the proposed project are evaluated ( "Reduced Iin efteity Alternative" and "More Intense Dri1•li•ng .Program" ) . four alternative sites are examiand; the evaluation of one of thesd alternative sites 8xam(nes t" potorAi al configurations . The overall abandonment of oil , production is evaluated, as is the development of a nediue--density residential pr•ojfpct on 'the project site. CZOA r"nirep theft; at least one alternative be identified as "enviraruontally superior" to the proposed project; the DSZXR concludes that the overall abandonment of oil production' is "the environm atally superior" alternative to the proposed project , but that this alternative does not appear to be " feasible" . Staff Report - 10/18/68 -7- (1455d) 5.: now C1%1T1r1C. JQM OF amlt 86-,1 Am Ell 96,--1 : DSZIR 88-1 and L.IR 86-1 adequately analyze the potential environm&ntal impacts of the proposed project. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve and Certify the document . Resolution 1407 :. (Attachment No. 6) is provided for certification. ' Artie" or p9.949..PROJECT CAVA $eCtion 15091 requires that prior to a public agency approving or Ca out a project for which an SIR have been completed and to"d �if ea one or more signifiroant environiyantal impacts, the public ` agency auxt make one or more written findings for each of those significant effects . In eddit:iono CEQA requires that f,indngss must be } supported by substantial evidence . Findings and facts in support of { findings regarding the nIgnifi.cant effecter identified in DSEIR 88-1 an4 SIR 86-1 are listed in detail in Attachment 4 of this staff report . In addition, CEQA requires that when a project has been identified as having significant imp-lets which cannot be reduced to a level of inaignifi.cance through mitigation measures, a statement of overriding coikaiderationes muot be made. In this o,tetement , the Planning Cow4iasion and City Council must find that the economic and social i benbtits of the proposed project outweigh the project ' s potentially adverse Impacts. A statement of overriding consideration is found in Uiac#��nt no'. 5 of this staff report: . In that statement, staff ' s for date mining that the remaining effects of the adverse impacts are "acceptable given off-setting project benefits , is discussed . 4 .0 REM 1 Dx'IIdle_: Staff recommmends that: the Planning Cemnission adopt and certify as adequate MIR 88-1 and EIR 86-1 by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No . 1407 with Statement of Overriding Considerations , and forwa+:d DSEIR 88-1 and EIR 86-1 to the city Council for their adoption ; and certification with the following findings and conditions of _. approval (mitigation Measures) . J 1 ` 1 . b69Ilt 8$-1 s%d Elk 86-1 have been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act as amended June 1986, , and all , State and local gpaidelines therefore. 2 . DBUR 88-1 and 'EIR 88-1 adequately addresses the, potential enviroftMentel impacts that may be associated with the Springfield Oil RoCovery Project and is found to be certifiable. SIAT NT OF OVER911311irg _CONS I DERV-,:J2 S - DSE Y R �Q_]•_: 1 . The economic and social benefits of the proposed Waterfront project outweigh the project 's unavoidable adverse seismic , energy, aesthetic/view and cumulative air quality impacts . Staff Report 10/18/80 ( 1,455d) 2te r1'I �A� tag .1°Y fi r, bpti 1 . The site plan , elevations and landscape plan dated received October 13, 1988, shall be the conceptually approved layout . a. This use permit shall not become effective until Zane P Change. ft . 68-11 has been approved and in effect . 2. All structures and procedures .shall conform to Title 18 of the liunt'inaton Beech funicipa l Code and the Division of Oil and Gas Standards . 3 . The applicant shall obtain all necessary electrical and building permits . 4 . Heine monitoring shall be conducted un..er the supervisf:n of an acou.O.ida3 engineer certified by the County of Orange . Reports shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development within three working days after the completion of each phase of the monitoring effect. The monitoring shall include thh fol lowing t a * pre drilling..jpbas&„J ita�. prior to the start of the th'ill . o measurements s�.all be obtained during lin hose, noise petation df'--the speetfic dtil7l .q rig which has been selected and the measurements shall '.�e related to those which will be experienced at the nearest residential boundaries to they drilling site. in addition, the noive "control measures have been (or will be) applied to the rig tv needed for compliance .with , the City of Huntington peach Noise Ordinance shall be identified . ..,k�. ta►r s C.i� 9t. Noise measurements shall be' obtained. during the nighttime hours (10 : 00 f to 1:00 AKJ for at least *I* h64 rs on each of throe nights 'within the five day 61,1 period froapr the start of the drilling phase. Monitoring `is to ocour st' `the nearest residential boundary to the actual drilling 000ratiun, The noiso level diet& shall be compared to those specified in the City of ' K�ntingtoh 18each Noisc Or'din�nce by the 'ifrparEMOAt• Of • C WMnity,,0retveloptamnt• Whore an ekt wedance of the ordinaynce to lddatified, noise control measures . shall be applied and an 04itional two nights of monitoring shall. be required. staff Report 1o/1s/ $ -9- (1455d) C . Dur#na_t_he Drilling ,Ph`. Poise monitoring shall occur during a six-hour period between the hours from 10 : 00 PH to 7 :00 AN at least once each month during the drilling phase of the project . The noise level data obtained ehall be compared to the City of Huntington Detach Noise Ordinance s,:sndsrds by the Department of Community Development. ��. Where ,an "ceedance of the standards is identified, noise Control measures shall be applied and an additional two nights of monitoring shall be required . 5 . Measures to reduce erosion should be used during grading and site preparation. Grading and construction activity shall take place only during daylight hours after the issuance of a 's grading permit by the department of public Works . 6 . During grading and excavation, earthmoving crews should observe A: cuts and spoils for potential archaeological finds. in the event of a potential find being located, operations shall be !' suspended until the significance of the find is determined . a 7 . A dust : control program shall be submitted to the Department of Community Developma,it for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits . $. All street improvements for both 'tracts shell be constructed after the han,yy ,gr-adina operations have been completed (approximately 4 weeks) : a . Final grading , or any other on-site construction shall be prohibite3 until street improvement construction has cony enced. C; b. prior to any on-site constructi6n or drilling , the masonry ' Mull and all landscaping and street improvements shall be installed subject to the apptaval of Department of Community Development and Department of public Works. 9 . priorr . to the in'stal latiori of any landscaping, a landscape and irrigation plan $hail Y)e submitted to the Department of Community Development and public Workm for review and approval . a . A1l• landscaping shall Comply with Chapter 15 .22 of the Huntington Reach Qrdi uance Code and all trees shall be mi.nimm 24 inch box type and spaced no greater than za feet on center . r 10 . Prior to the installation of the office structure, elevations shall be provided for review and approval by the Department of Community Development . a . The office shall be on a permanent Foundation b. A mansard or pitched rc,of shall be provided. Staff Report 10/10/88 -10- ( 1.455d) Y;Y� ,. � . r 1 � 1 ti l 1 r 11 . The applicant shall enter into a ftanchise agreement with the City fo,_ the installation of the underground connection between the two blocks , if required. 12 . The proper sealing and abandonment of the existing scattered wells which will be replaced by thin project shall take place following approval of this project and must be completed within eighteen (la) months. T, ' 13 . The outface of the site shall be completely covered with an appropriste material. (much as gravel and/or asphalt) subject to review and approval of Public Works Department, Fire Department f' and Department of Community development. 14 . A report pteparod by an acoustical engineer certified by the County of Orange shall be submitted to the Department of k CoMmunity Dsvelopment for review and approval prior to { comeacing drilling. Said report shall, describe noise levels at th6 {Angus Oil Site property line and at the nearest residential property line both with and without an acoustical "L blanket an the drilling rig and serv3ee rigs. The report shall indicate noise attenuation measures necessary to ensure W compliance with the Huntington hescb Noise Code . This shall include the provisions of the Ordinance Lode regarding maximum hourly, average naive level at nearest residential property line t: of 50 db(A) during ,nighttime houka between 10 : 00 FM and 7:00 AN. a. A double acoustical blanket enclosure shall be 14rovided at man-door entrances. 15 . Noise attenustion for the drilling operation , oil operation and service operation shall be provided pursuant to the Oil Code and noise_'�;reobrt speci.fisd1 in Condition 14 . a. If a noise violation occurs o the entire drilling stiucture shall be wrapped with an acousticai blanket for greater 'miine htteituatione i 16. The pFoject shall f.xlly comply with the Huntington Beach Nome ` Ordihb .' At tHa applida -I s ezpenl3e, a dontinuipus calibrStod i truer shall be an site to monitor the decibel (dRA) level with j 'r a print6 dopy 'to be Made available to City...staff and Ad Hoc A#60j Virol"t flee#dal Committee on a weekly bar i s . 17. no . speake rs, laud bells or buezerRs shall be employed on site . 7.6 . Nze' eselY s vibrartion# as determined by the Department of Comunity Development, shell, be redtice6 to acceptable levels . 1.9 . Light � and glare shall be directed axed/or screened to prevant *spillage" 'onto adjacant residential properties and shall be ew rgy efficient subject: to the requirements of the Building Division. i staff ' 26port ..- 1.0/18/88 _11- ( 1455d) i 1J i 7 b fAMb r 20 . All heavy truck traffic shall be limited to the following streets between the 405 freeway and the subject site: Beach Boulevard, Adams Avenue, and Delaware Street . For entranCe to the site only Springfield Avenue and California Street may be used. 21 . Heavy truck traffic shell be limited to the hours between 7 : 10 AN and 5 : 00 PM. a . No trnaks may park on tho street . b. Truck deliveries shall be staggered so that no stacking shall, occur on public streets . 22 . All employees must park on either one of the two sites . Street parking for employees is prohibited . 23 . Local streets affected by truck traffic shall be inspected f. before and after •construction . Any damage to local streets by heavy trucks shall be repaired and reconstructed per City requ rements at the expanse of the applicant . 24 . All driveways xha•11 be radius type and constructed to public Works sthndards . 25 . There shall be, no entrance or exit of vehicles from the drilling site between the hours of 10 : 00 PM and 7 :00 AM except for os,*rgen,cy purposes. 26 . An overload permit should be obtained from City and State ( if , required) for all oversized loads to be moved on publ,tc streets . 27 . Pipe string cementing through fresh water bearing sands shall .. be implemented to prevent salt water intrusion into the 't 28 . A s3stem for collecting,, treating, and releasing Storm drainages r shall be provided by the applicant and approved by Public Works # 29 , Brine water shall not be released into the sewer system. 301, A -reeling plan of produced zone water beck to the oft reseetvdir shall be certified by the Deportment of Oil and Gas and the Fire' Departa+ent and all its conditions f+t=d restrictions shall be adhered to, 31 . Wel.1 service rigs shall be operated no more than a total of 48 days per year betwesh 7: 00 AN and 7: 00 PM of daylight hours , %thichaver is shorter. 32. No more then foe►r well service rigs may be on the premises at any one time. The service, rigs shall not exceed 120 feet in height and shall be double, muffled and utilize acoustical blankets as deemed necessary. Staff Report: - 10/18r88 (1455d) } w3 ago VC V 'r�11 ✓t 91 . All drilling rigs and production wells shall be operated by electrical motors and electric pumps only. j 34 . ' 24- ut -,pbas• dri l ling rigs shall not Operate for any 1AAAAC. than 2 bears from the issuance of the first drilling prillinq rigs for remaining wells after the two year period 6hnll c+o► rl '�ri,th the conditions. Bubsequent drilling shall be �Rr . �lmi ted to : 00 At to 10 : 00 PK only. • F 36 . Drillings derricks shall not exceed 165 feet in overall height . 37 . Upon Completion of 24 hours phase of injection and producer wells, all drilling rigs shall be removed from the �ii.te. Y ld . Service rigs shall be erected only during maintenance operations . ;,. 39 . Applicant shall install blowout prevention equipment. 40 . A full vapor recovery system shall be installed as required by the SOUth Coast Air Quality Monogamist District . r' 41. . Only threw on-site crude oil tanks are permitted and shall never bile'; completely f.°u ll at once. 43 . Pirepsr• and submit a Preliminary Emergency Action plan (EAP) prior-, to isruahce of folding permits,. A completed Emergency Action KOR Wood on an-Oui It plans shall be completed and � y. subfoiiteo prior to the start of oil production operations . The 0440�w Action plover Shall include employee , trai;ning and. 'f4. prkstice, - how op.11aga+ onto, stf.�lr.k from site(s) �tauld (Stockpile of isand, etc. ) , �t'he safe handling of any ' "end/ot glat�riala , aud, full Knowledge of all systen;d A spy shall be oei file with the Fire CeOr nt and updated on a rive ye.v,r basis . in addition, a ' `�V °Vf'bAti4o' � d Cra�trol 8fmd C�itmRt:rtmte►su,re CB � Plan in �tit1M City requi�r+�ats . for handl4.nq. of dpi le, , etic . >r•., b��tW$wite covered in the 'Zmergency Action Plan shall be , end !'31 wit he Cit rear' t* thm "tt of oil aw(! t Y 'P I?: 43 . Jul oil' BOAlk transported by pipeline. 44 An od-Site fire suppression aystem shall be installed as a primary source for firer protection pursuant to Fire Departmont tWi'r'+Nd�Maetl►d . , dtog# Veport - iS/Zered -13- ( 14554) M R w NAM . A: M 45. Collor requirements for oil wells : a . A hydrogen sulfide detection system for the well callers shall be installed subject to Fire Department requirements . b. ghee extinguishers approved by the Tire Department must he installeMd within 75 feet of travel on-site. Provide' metal open grate covers over top of well collars . 46 . Storage tank requireirents : a . Must have pre--plumbod foam inJection sratem installed on all product storage tanks . b. Hust have exterior deluge water spray system on all storage �. tank$ $ 47 . $its requirements : 4 . All diked areas must have an engineered drainage system. b. Foam storage area and foam quantity to be approved by fire Department , c. n re hydrants to be located in a re es approved by Fire Department . d. M)drogeen sulfide detection syaten approved by Fire "pittmerbt to be installed on project perimeter . pith eextitiquishars approved by the Firm Department suit be ihdtnlr thteughout the site. �' •"��1,� s 609 .i�ngs must be 24 ferret In width and instal lati )n *` A48t, t"ply with Direr department specification 402 . 4 � 11 c*114 s ,shall be nalatai n ed in a clean and efficient h�annor tQnt as'vtrt arrcumuls r ion . 49 . Toon6y,-iidse (21)�, slbandoned wells have b+ae u identifled within the pr644ft area which do not most prevent day abando ant re reftots . A cONtingoncy plan shall be outlined and sUbMitt6d, t6 the Huntington Roach Vice Depart eat tar review and approval with steps to be taken in the event that leakage f rd& any bf theses abandoned wells finds its way to the surface . 5d . pr;ior ,to terminaticon of the oil operation, a plan sh'ai'1 be nut ni t ted subject to review and approval of the Fire Department and Community' Development Department, showing how the site steal). be abandoned and restored to its closest natural state . Staff RIPOrt 10/18/08 (1455d) �Y . ftesreN shall be no pipeline construetion activity outside the site elcerpt between the hours of 7 : 00 AN and 8 :00 PH, Monday through Saturday only. 52. The mthodology of oil recovery for this project shall be Jlmit 4 to wetetfr injection only. Steam injection shall be Groh i�teMd . 53 . Tho 6petater bhall at all times during the term of this use permit and any renewal or extension thereof , maintain in force as insursnc* ", licy or policies insuring the operator, and as Oditional insureds the City of Huntington Beach, the City Coo' nei l and each member thereof* and every officer and amploy►eee of the Cite acting in the due couirne of his employment or in his official capacity, against liability or financial lass resulting from any suits , claimsi or actions brought by any person or per- sons , and thorn all costa and expenses of litigation brought against the insureds , in the amount of not loss thorn $5,000# 000 combined single limit for eny injury to persons or damage to property, including (but not limited to) i ri j u rY or damage from subsidence and rebound, resulting from the rotor 's oil dtriiIi.ng and produ^tion activities and ophtc ions incidental thereto. &aid policies shall provide that tho insurance coverage shall not be cancelled or reduced j by the insurance carrier without tNe City having been given at least tort dL. s prior written notice thereof by such carrier . The operator shall not cancel or reduce said insurance coverage ,, At all times during the term of this use permit , and any, r4kke*a1 or eexte uxion thereof, the operator shall maintain on filed with the City Clark a certificate or certificates 'of Iefurrshce issued by the' carrier or carriers showing that said i4#Uf snce is in effect in the amount re4ui�red above, and a copy of * 0 h urance policy If the operator, doors not � Mop said ln"trt"* III full Norte and effect, titre .City may obtain said r: insurance and pay the premium thetreon a which shell then be deemed a dint owned by the operates to the City. Any insurance eq procured by the operator hereunder shall provide that e Urande (ihrrier waives all rights of subrogation sgaInst ,r t 6 Otyo tf the! City obtains any policy of insurance }, h 1OU1664r, such �r'licT .snail include a waiver by the insurances carrier of all rightti< of subrogation against their operator . 54 TM Planning Ca Omission sball review and , if necessary may > ify the Cor.ditions as not forth in this use permit, at the first regular 'planning Conmisiion meeting in October, 1.989 , and at' five peas intervals thereafter, and upon any change in aWaedrahip of the project which vecurs between five-year reviews; VFofvld*d that the phrase "change of ownership" as used herein shall not include any sales or other transfer to a corpotatiom* partnership or other form of business organisation in which Alberts Natural. Gas-United States and/or one or more of its shareholders or subsidiaries owns the controlling intelrests , or any swine or transfer no long as Angus or one of its subsidiaries remains responsibility for the operation of tho pfb j e ct . FI 1 e 1 fir , TI�'�'�,M•i' 1 +V 55 , The Planning Commission reserves they right to revoke this US* permit if enr violation of thesss conditions or the huntingtoo 3each Ordinances Code occurs . The City shall provide the property owner with notice in writing of any violation, stating that city' s basis tot,,-eiete1:Miaiag that a violation has i occurred. They soperty owner shall have a reasonable time to cure the violet on before further action is taken. The City .vey require t'ho property owner with notice in writing to ssbaiit wxiatan +docu mntatIon, of actions taken to remedy avy violation wad may requi rt monitoring or other procedures to be iM,P1WWate4 in order to ensure that the violation will be cu%*A. y, 55. The nine nee x project review committee shall moni wor the project during the drilling phase and semi-annually theereaftar .. The Fire- Department and Community Development departments shall Jointly provide a staff liaison. 57 . The property value protection plan submittfad by the applicant , V shell be implemented as outlined prior to drilling . 58 . Xn the event that either one of the two blocks is to be without 24--hour supervision, a video camera shell be employed on-silts, to provide continuous survei,li ante *hich can be monitored by personnel at the other site . 1. Errata Sheet 2 . Co rit latters 01 Draft supo',emental FIR No. 88-1 and FIR No. � 3 . CiI ° responses to comments on Draft Supplemental CIA No . 08-1 � ate, p�Xt go. 0e-1 t 46 rindi;tfox and Fictc. in fupport of Findings Rbgtzdinq tho UviV,k--tanntal Imprct Report forAngus Oil Petroleum Corporation Stsmhiftt of Overriding Considerations S. MO Uo,ion No. 1407 M., sda 1 r 1 ATTACHKENT 1 ERR,ATP SHEET I � r •a .+w 1.Ah r F9tRATA TO DRAFT SUPPL23MMAL Fr--TROVWNTAL XMPACT REPORT page 23 oection 2 . 3 .3 Change "CUP" to "UP" Pace 25 Section 3 . 4 . 2 . S . 1 ChL%ngr• "CUP" to "UP" Page 26 SecLion 3 . 6 . 2 . r . 2 Change "MP" tC "UP" Page 27 Secona linen Change "CUP" to "'JP" Page 27 z,ast lire Delete "nine" , AC.d "of the" rage 28 arc C. -na Change reference to "CUP" to "UP" Page 32 Sections on Change "55 feet" to " 5n .feet." �ti�rrt i na y�hicle� I� I A TAC,i�,a:NT 2 COMMENT LErXERS ON DRAFT SEIR NO. 88-1 AND EZR NO, 86-1 a, f !M n 0++ • / +� ' M ' 1 1 l . 11"I&V At DRJ1", lIC1rpIL.R1L=TAL IRPA" XRPOIR ' FOR TU ANGUS 014 RECMRY P54J5CT 5C2 NO. 86040917 Prepared for : Cbmamm CIT19XWS or 50fiiTIKSTOM OCAM C/o Ms. Macy 9 Pacciab, Treauucec 1919 la auas Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92646 riroporad bp►: C"mls , Inc. 2952-5 htllara street _ Mmta Ana, Cal 62705 Telapbme t 4 714 ) 261-543A 9i�lSMtil 1966 till , I Y I RIIIvxzw or ORA" avPPGRX=TA>L IMPACT RXFORT FOR THE ARGUE QZL 38COVE41f FWD 209 RCN IIo . 86040917 1XIMMCTION This domment was prepared under contract tc thw Conoecnrd Citisaps at. Huntington Such and saa malls Chs"ers'* Group., j Inc. ll s, -ceview of the Draft gupplemmntal MIR (Draft MR) for the propac:.. Argue Gil ltsoovery Sra,ject . she draft SSZR was reviewed Ly rsea; k'r of Chaehern GroupPs tochnica►l staff under tha direction cf Xr . John Westerrnei,er . ftambera Group specializes in ttie propagation of snv1rronmental documents for on- and offshore � oil and gas pirojects . No have peeparred overt• 30 ma►jorc onviron mental documents far local and state agencies for oil and gas peojoct : in the State of California . ' 1 This review 'As divider! Into two major Boatload . Tk.- first section provides our generart cements on the - document -anti the second suction provides our specfflc comments on various subject a Coat M we hove alio included a brief conclusion to our review tolkowiftg oar Speaifle comments. .. ; .,14 4' 1 --- i No hovo identified several i.rrragularities in the O aft SEIR which # in our opinion$ makes the Draft inadequate in its present fors. These are described belows 1 . The summary of findings tells to conform to Section 15123 of CSQA in that, the suwsacy should incLudo all significant Impacts and mitigation measures as well, as identification of alternatives that could reduce these impacts to *e gnificint levels. the •uaursi y falls to list all sign1fleont impacts identi.fLod in the wain text of the document. The Suntary dues i not discuss iiltearnatives, areas of controversy or issues to be rerolv*d. 2. The Draft 831H lailx to . address the environmental issues associated with the construction of a *waatteer pipeline from the Chevron facility to the proposed project site. Construction' of such a pipeline would have the potential to create traffic, air quality, noise and public safety impacts that are not addressed in the document . yuctherprore , the water q"lity impacts are not &ddrress&A should tnr pipeline rupture during operation. 3. The SuR does net address the iasapauts associated with the coostcuction of a gas pipeline to the Chevron facilityo As described under Po. Z at:bve, there could be significant 16pacts associated with construction of the pipeline as well &a the public si-fety - impacts associated with s potential pipeline aroptueo . i . The project site is rather unique in that the proposed drilling and processing site is located directly adlatent to 2 residential units . The SKIR due:i not address the impacte in enough detail necessary to detrEuine the actual im arct , nog• 9 Y p does it identify spocific mi. t3gation measures to reduce any identified impacts , of articular concern ,is the roleast, of i d P P toxic materials during accidents and spills , as well as the migration of gas due to the repressurisation of the formation. 5. The $SIR fails to identify the criteria that were usaid for the determination of significance of Impacts . Additionally, the effectivei.sss of the mitigation seaosures and the significance of the residual impacts have not been clearly defined. d . Although . th►e SUR does ideritify various projects for cumula- tive analysis , it fails to provide an analysis of the overall � cumulative iapact, :.; termination -if the significance of thla impact and formulation of mitigation measures as required in $ecti.or. 15130 of CRQA. The gt%alysis falls to reflect the full range of cumulative impacts particularly for systeas safety, seismicity, hazardous materials , noise and water quarl ! ty. 7 . This MR fails to address a full range of alternatives. In particular , it roes not address the al+teccietive of protesering oil at a site remote from thie proposed project aria . This alternative would substantially reduce the systems safety impart associated with a firer In the storage tanks . It also J doaei not a�ddre%s the no oil storage Alternative nor does it i address alternative designs of the proposed facilities an tkis propeesbd 'sites . Additionally, the document does not coarsider an Oltert&&tive where the unprocessed all is transferred via u now pipeline to the Chevron facility, eliminating the need for separate processing facilities . 3 ,ti!u r ,k r� 1 ' I ' II I Aq Pv» Tnbes as s3axQda.2d 30 19TI 11na a aplAoid of 91Tea vx;ii ays ' b - IN 0127TaPTno V023 otil 30 OE19T uoT;osv Aq pa3;nurs 80 WAT31ri1.1a14TY �Q °,adc.9 XTJW;ur'91.1osInug uv A#TluaPT 014 s'!M 21:19 OMi ' . .. . .. ...r r.��... .ti•...., .!... .i. ..�..,.........•.SAP•Ar'.�N!•..AP.4\ wpm . 1 Mob y 4 - 4 SPZCIYIC CUMMU7t3 . I �►. Top"caphyr soils, and "91097 1 . The asllt fails to Address the consequences of the 8 . 0+ earthquake an the operation of facilities including such sffe%As as rupturing and overturning of tanks , rupturing of containment dix' se and other accidentc that would have a potential for release of product. This damage would have the potential to affect the neighboring residences and would exacerbates any public oaf ety Impacts associated with damage to residential units. No mitigation measures are provided In berms of emergency procedures, mobile containment facilities or, the like to mitigate any potencia l Facts Associated wlih release of products during a seismic event . s. �ty�d�roXoo•. _ 1 . The aslit fails to identify the water . quality impacts associated with the construction and operation of the proposed gas pipeline and brine pipeline. 2« The s922 fails to identify the water quality Impacts associated witb the potential tupture of the crude Oil ' piped t*o: **trying the oil psoduotd by the proposed p 4$44t- to the Chevron facility* white *a understand that the use of an existing pfpaliete controlled by • Gh6vran is pre:pose d o the proposed project ject will l9VertbiRle;%& i�coate additloo*1 quantities of, oil shipped 414 - the Vi U" Mad the ro'lesse of this a mitionai oil �a �: ,, should be add oased. 3 . Thy► hydrology section does not address the water quality impactu to the groundwater &quifer due to the release of crud-- oil , solvents or other toxic mate.tial . 4 . The SLx:t fails to identify the impact of disposal o; filtrate material esso6irtted with the processing of to jtv..tion grater , C. L1aod use, 1 . The BEER faeilra to address the Impact of the proposed project on the existing CC&R' s for than proposed proJecr . r 0. "athet1col Light *ad Glare 1. The SKIN does not address the flood lighting requiried f during the drilling process . 1 . The SUR only co atains one rendering of the proposed pro jeot... it. does not show scale nor does it hove a description of perspective . beveral scaled renderingM from several viewpoints would .-be necessary to assess the visual Impact - Wo Ai a► QuAX-sty 1. "t 2222 does not describe the sir equality impacts ass.. dated with 'construction of the gas and water .. �►lpeMli�tia. w11 . _. 1ho .'dR1d also a 9s, not address the dust- related impacts -� acted by area homeovnairs during ` ' %fie initial conStruction 6 Mob .. k . phase . Additional measures to& dust control such as use of dust control cheenicala should be discuGsed . 1 . Although the SMIR doss analyse ewixeaiona associated with normal facility operation, it fairs to calculate emissions assacLated with oil spills in the . facility. because the factlity is in - close proximity to residential units , the taissionea , Including public ixposuse to bensea* , should be ralr.ulatod for an spisods what* oil is spilled and cont3i ned In the containment area and then cleaned up by vacuum t Kuch . 4 . The OUR fails to want i on the expected cc-neent ra t i on of U25 within the gas extracted from the well . Sioce soar ifas oncurs within the the Huntington Teach rields , the air qu&1itY • analysis should Includes modeling of the erxpoeeuce of a2s to mires residents in the event of rrlems* of toxic gees . F. Raise i I . The 8211t, as well as the previous Me did not quantity the magnitude of Impact of the rkatas associated with the drilling operation. The extent of esitigation afforded by the control measures have not boon been quantified in nadec to deaterrmihe► wheatha t Impacts have been readuced to insignificance . a. Risk es4. VL►eteat,/dvNan eetarlth and 8ef7tJ 0044tiruction o! a major oil any, gas facility '''I" alas* Proximity to residential areas presents spociAI ayoons . tt►* +rty , pc+ebisms, ftV a harly~tsis in the dblit (jcnearally takes ths approach that it an event to unlikely to occur , there in g I ..are .. c no impact , the general state.-of- the - eirt rinalysis for oil and gas peo jects projects base the project impwc:tat an cunsa--. quences of an accident , Prot upon the probability of cc^urrenct . it is l. s.kely that even an event of low probabil-- ity of occurrence coul+i occur d%tr-i.nq the life of the project . The analysis of this section i s �vlly Inadequate , lacking quantitative analysis assuming reasonable worst-:1ltv4 analysis 'i and fails ti p::ovtds detalled ■! Ugatian waasures to mitigate ' or reduce the consequences of an upset air accident. Additionally, a prelisirrakry risk asanagemenr plan and .&pill comtingen' ey plan should be provided during Koview of the 59IR i in order to fully evaluate the effectiveness' of the programs proposed for mitigation. Deficiencies noted in this section includes 1 . The 391a. staters that there will not be dny Impact ce►ue4d by leakage of gays due to Propressurixati,on of the formation . This conclusion is based on xturliPePs indicating few current problems with Oxisti>ng wells . The proposed wa►terflood project would initiAlly substantially Increase pressure wLthin the formation and may cauts gas leak* at wells that .curre►ntly do not leak Additional studies are Prequi gyred to determine the extent of, this i*pact and realistic mitigation meaamures such as resealing of walls, use of qas detectors in homes !and the use of evacuation plans mast be provided. The Sala should discuss the impact of fire and/or explosion at the drill rigs in addition to thorn* Impact* ih • 1 associated - with oil storage . Ths 8919 should dincusss the potentitL fa.- release of gas ceahta to#nag h 8 from both the fa !1 i ty and from the plperlifte, Dastard footprints should be calculated !cooed 8 iWrIIIY I + ( y, an the concentration of HZ5 as well as the volume iri the P#%) !- - or wall head. 4 . The BEER should discuss the potential for fire and explosion from natural, gas at the wo." ]. head ur in th3 prnposed pipeline. S .r Th* SUR showlJ diacuiss th* t ncirerental. l ap4-ct of oil spills at f!.ras In the Chevron crude all piprline. d . Quantities at each hasa rdaus charm r`al• projected for use should be •stLuated. An analysiir should be made of the Impact of spills of the quanttttoa oR Mach chemical as well as casbination of chemicals on the surrounding H. Traffic' 1 . The SLIP. does not address the traffic .impacts associated with the construction of the. gas and water. pipelines . y. f...,r wr • 1 C�k�LYy�i(iD� i Our review of they SnIft has poxntad umt several ma ji)r deficiencies in the documer_t including the of analysis of tau major pipea2Sn*% di rsctly assocl,atad with the projoch ars well, aR not ISraal-iing a e:imltobenst•va Analymis of the cusaulatilre impacts of: the psopossd project . xdditianally, the RystamA safety aspects of the proposeei project and aeay.&:sl ctha r l s,ataes have not beer, adequately sddceassd. Substantial t4viblon of t.hw current Draft, Ma .. la theereafore erequirr4z. Si.ncs Vie rr*viae3d document will vadoubtedly Identify adds tianal s.19ni iic ant impacts . wor bee ievat that the reewice d docuaent should be rouLroaulated as a Draf: SICIP. tO a110W fur4:Gfr review by bc4:h Reusl ansiblt. Agoccie;s and :.he Public btfo're consideration by tha dacislon makeeb at tb* City-, i 1� r , CONCERNEDCITIZENS FOR HUNTROGTON BEACH Sal,tember- 17 , 11'_1 1 I.i:r. - � iiu:ntATit?toit F1nneht C:A. 92646 :'Y.1',.Iti �i:tC•i� cJ3' l�:.v''ii.l:�J`.1 , In rear.onpje to U-1f; ANUM" S EN ,just •rec,.ived, vie would lg.ita .to .br.Jm,,,r your attention •:,o the followir.4 CONOT-7- MED C1T'T'4,11,Nr1 c oiiin'.r3n-t;: At V,0NCLTYr,'* CTMAJENS rayt.,eati the (3001INTY ILIR gp'AS, rrT 110ARD erwe t;, u1easi're the duai t at pro,j e c t. a i tt, . They reported by 1*1aphome t that tiye wind, factor was only 8 min.jma_ )er holir on that Fa`t,:icul&r dej . The dtij+t blowl.ing wG, comi:i ; from the u tini.,zi::.cl atreet:� surrf)unding tale Uya pr-j �Ct sites mnd as we went Into the .dryer month of Jixly the du,,!ti fac for would got worse , 1. nmrniI43 was tent to /kNf M, bat no fine could be tnbdo on tix►t date . We werec�clvj.eed cal.). r ;<<ita rhet+ 's:he wind factor ra►s ever IviQi ewer haur ,and a,i.Aher hierAni.:-emont will be ma'i- . CCNCFMIET CI` - ZENS waver claiarv'ed ony water being put on the gui to high iao uids cii dirt to control, the dust. We were oubjeuted to :tnh.e althy l.tayer:i of dust in our atmosphere and homen bettmen 0,113TOHES' It 1967 wid JOKE 1 Y 1966 due to the Sarut Ana wind conditioxuaf which rill be soon upon rye again. A 6-1 ( 4) REAV7 TPTICx 'i'WFIC; Lceording to SETY, A5-101 a % foot turning radiuj6 its necrded for a semi traactr"r-trsiler Delaware Street is 60 fiat wiae with one-half only paved , Turning sou'Ja un Delaware off 3uringfiv7l.d Avenue at o4.1 t ril i* site will be riakyr for achool children, and their brut to be so near to ail► truck tinning path to U-te entranoe of the drill rite. on Ulaware Street. The opposite antruace In on California Street. Ca Llfornla Street; im .LC�"ft pride ane only h*lf paved on residential aide. CONCEIMED CITIL213 are Laying diificul'Ai.es in bolieving�' that the project will have only two trucks (what size?) per way coming to the project site during drilling phase and no additional truck tmtftc during the prvdue t&un phase. Very truly youra, A h - ~. • ODKCMED CZTIMS IaOR H B K#AY g. PAM SH cc: John 11eeterneier TXWURXR 01'.A IM CROUP join B. Murdock . 44 Ij00W j' ' M bi (& I ,9 la 's S KW fit. C;�► 16 n s i rl'4 t -•►�ti c }�c U ri v (' wkt +wi i�1,Ib `'+�� "=,,C�tti,iC As cL 5410 ►C� As 4-n .-Wl rsir4T �•��,.4i� i i ' �n ,�► fit. ��►�� , d • „� � lei, ;�� . . ,, re yr { his Ct'j :ge Corry 1801 Cajlifc>tnia StrcLaL .11 : !.y .10 , 1 486 Ilan t i ng ton` 13ench , (;A `taiy0r P'oher L Hand ic. C; i Ly Council Mel-') ers C, ,. :'Y OF I1t.1NTI NG Grp III;ACH 2000 Main Str(�,: t I Ict11 t. i I1g I on Nc��r„ , C-A 2648 Lear. Maryatz Mandic & Coiitnci '. ,`1embers , My lip' m(- is Gf't; r gt: Corry ano l 111 ar lim-,le-owrio a L Lhe a l)ovt' a lldrOS . My neighbors :.1►Id I. are very ("once Uned about a:1 pz-o ject. which wi 1 1 be tip for re,/iew by the Comm. issi on scrtnet ime in September. . This project is heing proposed by Angus Oil. CO . which waants Lo dr:• il '. 50 - 60 new ai. 1 weils over a period of two ( E ) years . Anr, .rs Oil �,o . ka, purrchased two 1110r.ks of land , l iii which there are approximately six homes avi puesen ly . This p---opnsed chill site is Located betwee:cl ':ali. Eornia Street wind ')elEware , Hochester anti Springfield sr.Leets And is surrOUnded by resident •-al. homes on three .sides . The valijo of the pro:;ec:t is in the range of $2.5 ,000 , 000, 00 . 1 have been wa Lch i ng the City ri f Ilan t. i.ngton Beach devea l-up and l like what has been approved , however , there- seems to he no way that a t)l-ojr-,: t Of this ma gnir.udey could be constructed end not have art or) the neighbt, hcno , f have ;cast. recently received Lhe Env ; r-onmen tt+ 1. 1 mpar I: Repo . t and I a,n concerned about a Fzaw things in which I wouLd like you Lo review and consequently , CeS[;r►ricl LU : A ) Dr. i. l I i ng noise for a. peciocl of one. ( 1. ) to two years using a 1 , 000 hor-, epower- electric {Motors for twf-nty-- four ( 24 ) ho+ir s a clay . Will you guarantee ass that this dr i l 1. i n,, Operation will, not be- a oui sanc.e? The IKIR r;-c_part is not: c aLaileel er otigh in regards Lo tree effect the noise level will have on the surrounding residence , especially at night . How aL -rut. limiting the drilling peri nd to clay time hours only . 11 ) Maintenance of the yells . This will. occur after thewel. ls are completed . Lets say they have fit) wells that deed �o ria? cIeantni Iwo tunes a year . 'This opearaL' ion takes approximately two days per well , which «loads 120 out of the year a po 1 ilig rig will he operating on the site creaLirig noisy. . Iver•harirs y.•crr{ eiiii req1res t thn t trey insulate these pu 1 I i ng rigs ever, though the actual work occurs during the daytime hours . What about litre aleig,hhors that weak out of the r hotnes , have daytime boarders , and the people that work at night , will this noise create a nuisance in their case? �i►�L�91�6k{� r.i 11t __� '\i_''1t 1.' u. �.i....-•___-,...__ ._ ._.__ .. _. _ _ ._ ., . _..�,._�__.i._u..�.- - . �......_� _. _ , MEN" 1 1 !e11 y 0 , l 986 'iayo e. Mand i c. C i t y C ounr. i ) eieilihe r-:, I'aP,.t 't,w() I kni)w Lhn L it pii I I i q! I' 1 1., b/ 1 1 1 !'' )�C eed the l,i t: y T1(.1 i se C rd i I-la l" if on - ins111,:3rLC(I , hl (;a:ie rosp011d 0n -ha.s wi. LI1 j'0ur VieW4:; . 0 n e (1pLion is to 1. i.i li L Lhe nrnotrrc t. of t:c) drilled which in t.►lrn wil l der- I eilse tilt, ,nCIi 1) Leon ncP. . (; 1 1. e rCCi ."it. in,i o t }ie horit'.s 111rri-)tIiIdi_ n's clI i.IldySt-.rial lLr' . 11st I)urJT i:(T-TQ'y t l. tist ilorne anc�� l tlrrl CfbllGty'l. ClEi.� 1.hT jL it an Crnergericy %oa5 t0 occur nail I ilacl to se1. 1 my home , , ho%v WOUld poLen, L. . buyers (ce;. AbOUL buying, a home surrounded ;sy clt- il. ling rigs .ape: rFat. ing 24 hr�urs a et.ly? Would you bUy a hone across thw street from a project like 1-his ? 1) ' , , "0" which expressly,) Lon;.11 Ihi� J.ar1d is cLTrt'�_ntl.y zoned as ��_ i bits new drilliri& operat;i.or.u . To al .lte,r this project to pT-rceed,the (Aty has to re-zone +this area . The zoning was also written co protect t-he residential area frow new we1. 1. dr i, i 1. :i ng— flow can you a f l ow this in it r es i d e n L ia1. area which has been zoriod for re.,; ial unj t:s . What good is zc.)n i rlt; if yoti c.liange: it cell L I N, L i,mf� ? It was i ni. ti.a l l y iun(�c1 "0" h) all(�w Lhe exi.stin}; welts Lc) continue pllenl) in ; wlllC:h i 5 ra i r si nco they have been here many years . E ) Ae:5thCLies . The i l:R revcrt states out: homes are 10 Lo .1') � 7e3T-s r)TT. My 1106lt is noly ? years old . Wi. l.l the block wall. surroundin6 the site 1- lend of :semi runtish each type of liousi.: : CeaLure? The tiornes alon- California Street between Rochester and Springfield have trick facades , will this 'Dloc:k wall have lbr. ic:: incorpor Led i.nLo iLs ' design? The lalld,capi. na arcbcrnd the site deeds to be well maintained , t•on:J should be JMS tecl i.0 i.11:iUre this . We sugr,rs L Lh5 t. you take i1 drive by our homes , and' take a look at: 'hea(:T . F4 ) Set: I)acMs . The standard seL Flack for a residential home is ��t .� Since this is a►1 industrial u,e , WOuldn ' t you tend to agree that. set. backs -should be larger then 15 feet which would allow a l a rgor ou f f er zone between the >S i. e' .Wd t-he residence . I t would a l s:) decx easep the pass il�i. l i t%e5 of avaident:s . t t. mils ". be noted that these rigs s Land a sew hundred feet in the a: r. , and if ail accident; did occur , iL would •eft:ecL the residence . C Alternative sites . I would propose that they drill near thf.� ,r.vb,e: ente7e� TtEh is a coenvit-* >•ical zoned area . of course , i t would cost this o i. 1. company more money to drill f: rot, that lo'- ationr however , at t - ast it would ble .-id in better . d f+ July :i0j 1986, Mayor Mandic City (:Uul.l(: il Melllhel: L; i'age Thi-Pe 11 ) Ple"ise ro.-1 o '�-- l of INI. K oil iI ILcullatives . 1, p(trsonAfly di not, Hko i.o he (' lled by a ill 17 Z-'S 1. j 0 1 v planning oumillIssioll C3h C0(Id0(1Ii,FIiLJIll8 A dCV(? 10j)f-1d (:I') a site lh�, t. already has homo.-, on it. ilild Oil wells , they III L(S L be b 31, 1 n(I . Also , I heli-(!ve Lhe intensity should be r e cl ur-F-,d A ,i a ma t- t,c r of fact , 1:113. t; 1)r oj e c, 1, s 1-1()I I I d 11 c) t c!,.,en be a. ) lowed in a acen as alreudy stater] . 11 This LfE repui- L does ll() L acktruss LIte, homeowners concerns and is very biased in lily opinjoii . Plecrise react Environmental Ch eC " I 15 1 forms , 0 U wit 1-10 r t 11 V 1:C S U re 13 3 lot of ry)�,,y be. s Please review the Angijs 01A. Company for financial -- LaLus and 1)revious experience in puojecLs of this type . I can ' understand with t-h ! oj. ). abundance and prices of oil being as low as Lhey are , how this pi:ojt-,ct could be economically feasible during Lhese I. -Mes . This p-gice of property ha-- !)Paen around a long Lime and has ilever been developed by a large oil company . WHY? Ty. this srimernes pipe dream at Lhe expense of the residewJal dneighborhoocl ? What heppens if the pcoject. duestiL prod(ice as expected ? Will. it be re - zoned aga i n'1 am closing with Lho- hopes that you, will took at, this situation from ()III*, I)oj, nL of view as horneownears , n0t f%JtLJV4-. il'.'nOrne to the (,iL%f or Lhe ellimination of e-histAtip, wells in the surrQUnding al:ehs , because eventually , these wells will, depl%tLe themselves . 111 e !\llgus Oil comparly is claiming this I.F) (1) Ullitization project. ii-i ronlity it is a new drilling project in a resi(lential araa Which is against the zoning ' ordinance . hope I do not Sound to arroPant , however , I am upset ac what I have been hunring and st-eing in T-tg;1l7(,1s Lu Lhi %, project , and I do not believe it is in the best interest of the City or of Lhe sucroundine, area , I ) (.)t)k forwar(i to Your prompt rtesponsc . *ernly Curl,�, 1 1)8 Coll)"li SS i oil rir S LA f f L y sours i 1 Members M , , Hunfingt n Basch Company ics: 71?o Msio sit to, 026U, Huneirvion Oemb, CoNforriis 971A5-:479 1714)9184)•43,61 f A i 14 •96A; •36U9 Oc t obe*• 5 , 1988 `d�l%unity Dvvelopment Department. 200 Main Stree Huntington beach , CA 9264E Attn: M-9. KO-Ily M-iin "Juuple menLal c1n 136-- 1 Springfi,-ld 011 flotcovery Ptto,ject Dear Ms . Plain: Hlintingt;on Beach Company has revlI iwed the above refer-enced document and supports the Springfield Oil Reraver•y Project a� proposed . f the Supplemental EIR discuszes project: al,tarnaLives ,and identifies fuix altarnative drilling -Ites. Two of those four sii:as (Parcel. ! , See. 7. 5 and Parcel 3 , Sec. 7 . 0) are awned by the Huntington Peach Company. I Please be. advised that those pa.—eels are not available for use in conjunction with the Spring4leld project and should not be considered feasible alternative drill. sl.te3 . The Huntington Beach Company i-9 currently processing ent�tlements far residential development of Parcel 1 . Parcel 3 is planned for !future :,-o,mmercial and residential development consistent with the property) i zoning. Thank you for the opportunity to enrrment on Supplemental EIR 86-1 . Very truly yours , 161, [), 4 4- v('A William D. Holzan Sr . Project Ricpresentative ••.w , 4 'q ',p�Wst a �TJfgE �f CALWORMA--•,OAF KV QI Ime C 0M.. GIORCiR DIU MVIAN, Qove, l�r -- OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH "IIAMENTO. CA 93014 ` it Pam Fostell October 7 , :1198S City of Huntington Bpac.l) 2000 Main Street, Cmii. f)ev .. Huntington Reach, CA 92648 Subjects Anus PetrvItAurn Sprinofield Area O'll Rec:over.y Project 500 86040917 Dea� Ms, poste,n: The State Clearingh*use submitted the above named envi.ro;wentaY `oo.umenc to selected state agencies for review, 'Itlte state ayQhcy review perfci is now -closed and cone of the state agencies have comments . This letter ac+knowledge3 that you have complied with the State Clearinghouse revii w requ i rerant:s for draft envi.rcmwntat documents , pursuant to the California E'nvi3rrxmntal Oualit:y Act. plural contact Keith !Re at ,16/445-0613 if you have any gjeat:ions regarding the environmental review pnx.-ess. When contacting the Clearinghouse regarding this matter, please use the eight-digit State C'tearinghcose nurber so tot we may respond praWt]_y. sincerely? David C. ftwnkamp Chief office of Permit Assistance y M A , i 1 i A,r".rACftM8NT 3 C x TY RESPONSFS TO COMWNTS ON DRAPT SE T R ► 0. 6 6-1 AND EIR NO. 86•-1 I M a •^dGWw .1 A'rrACIOTENT f RESOLU'rios No . 1407 ko, 1 MOM r Another important 3s the i nc!rease in oil production, f rom 5 nt ljlion barrels of rJA t.o 9 millian barrels ultimately, resul t:i.nq from t ho c on.soJ.U.1at.ion . The of l will bi used to produce ga.:oline ( 'I Fit) million gallons) a»;i other petroleum products ( 162 mi 11on gallons ) . 1 i I Y 1 1 1 . The Fti:oic-'Ct. -•ai 11. 16 rls ,.-Anq t;ankx which are not subjeo,t, to c-oW. ro1r: fcjr air This will resu,t in a net reduction of 21 , 11.9R poun,,-Is of hydrocarbon emists -lons per. Year , or: un 87 ,percent: reduction in hydrocarbon emissions . Further reductions in hydrocarbon emissions will also result from the el.i.mInat:ion of other pr'OCeSO equipment . 211 .I Tho IiL:u j out. -ai l l bring :tbuu t. the abanC1unwufit, of 22 S%catt;erud wells over, a 160-acre area . As a result, the abandoned sites can be used for other purposes cor.sJ.sLent With their Genearal Plan aad zoning designations . Fewer City residents will live adjacent to or in close pioxi.mit-y to coil, activities . Thin will have positive aesthetic irnpact.s can the City . 3 . the project will result; in the abandonment to modern standards of wells whY%,:h have. bec.n Aandoned, but not to moderet standards . This will cont zibute to the public health and safety. 4 . The consolidation of a number: of oil producing operations or: e j single sate, with modern fire control. equipment, will reduce � the workload of the wi ty fire department . This will. contribute to the public health and safety. 5 . The project will ust approximately 30 , 000 barrels of ssroduced wgt:er for injection purposes . This water is currently dumped into the Ranitary sewer by Chevron . This will reduce the demand on the sanitary sewer systbm. 6 . The use of water Injection ham been shown to arrest subsidences, or even cause a slight rebound . The project: will. help to arrest subsidence in the Huntington Beach oil field . -.�.� (1.466d) 1 i y' 1 r 1 -alm Under a ward: cake Bcl3ndlT lC, , ate rs Ulf,i ric,( l,i M1 1. sa.i. :l oil [' �►Ykks fire full and the tanks 61e Set: out in an cal tf n fiold without surrr.•auriding perimeter walls , t:h�)te is a " raie" (defined in the standard mat:hodology for risk a:i 1 :10 , 000 'L,() 1. , 1. ; 000 non -hA6-!,f, t- can of 1 tunic Firf:i c:bu lad result: in radiant: heat affecting the area outside of the immediate. Project Site . 3 . Aajj1ju If are earthquake of Magnitude of 8 . 0 as grtarit er oil the Richter Scale occr.arn with its epicenter in the project ax.ea , structures in the Project Area, including tanks and walls of the; project facilities , would be damaged . Each of these effects is lessened by the mitigation mea,ux:es suggested in the Supplemental and original EIP , which measures will be required and incorporated into the project . Here, the City of Huntington Beach does find that this benefits flowing to the City and its residents from the project outweigh the significant adverse environmental effects which remain after they project4a mitigation measures Are implemented and that: the aforementioned '*unevoidable significant effects are acceotab?e, based on the followinq overriding considerations : -2- 1 �6d , 1 i SUF'OX•12W.NTAL XXV T ROMOWWAL y KPA("T REPORT NO. 8 6—1. ENVIRO1't�.°�.'NTAL YMPACr REPORT INC) , XtG•-1 STATEMENT OF UVEARM1NC+ 0"M5111EIZATION9 The E.iixa1 S b,ipp3ecYett : aJ. I:Aiv1)x iwit:,xit:c '? '1inPi1c',4 Rep. nor t: No - 98-1. and Environmental Impact Report Vn . 86-1 E,)r the Springfield nii Recovery project identifies certain un,"i,roJ. !irx.,*dw -Averse significant environmental effects . CFQA Ckiidelinea , 15093 , requires the decision•-maker, to balance the banef 1 is of a proposod project against its unavcidable envixroratent:al risk,- 17,,.. determining whether the project~ should be approved . At `.he decision--maker concludes that I t1he benefits of the, project: outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the effects may be considered acceptable . The final EIR identifies three separate uuavoid,abla adve r.se environmental impacts . ( Gem Section 2 . 0 , graft Supplemental E1it These are: 1 .• est: � � The neighborhood surrounding the project site r,onzists .)f medium density resi.denti,al uses , predomi.nsxntly in i:mall ( 8-10 unit.) developments and single family residences . Views of the project site from adjacent residences will consist of the a�:roening block wall and landsciaping , nuxi.ng the initial drilling phases,, drill rigs will be visible. During the ptaduction and injection phases, temporary drill rigs will be used periodically for maintenance and will be visible from ddjacsnt aresidente . Tanks will be visible above the wall . 41r 1.:h, £i'TATE EN'll' r,)F WIT',R AID NG .7()NS].D),bA' I%',)N^ 'y� I residential units would involve the t '-mporary ira a is normally associated with Kesidential construction incluaing increased Yioise , traffic , dust , risk of fire , paint fijoee and t. raeb . Such construction related impacts wouloi occur for a 1exiod of between uine months and a year . W&Mr' and oarking impacts &xe associated with the sales of rent*; activi-. ies involved with residential units . Such sales c.r renting relatad impacts may occur over a period of ketwe2n three months and a year . Wry; , traffic , pArking , risk of residential fire are imr, ce assocftes with the occupancy of residential units . Such impacts would be permanent , 3 . 10 . 3 W M,.ast... * Ifefting jxg-JgCt Qtj",..+.iyes : The IsnQ :r.o j ect" alternative would not me'-t ProJ ect objectives beraueu it resold not permit the recovery of 9 m: .11ion barrels of erode oil. loy uai.m& oecondary recovery techtidues xisticg 4i1 operations would only recov er er approximately 500 , 000 bairela of crude rail . ,i . 4 l ei i.1)i.i..i�v: �ha s alternative i s feasible . I i ter. allows f os the development of 108 units , and other rovisions of the Coda may allow a greater number of units or special purpose projects . 3 , 1 C. 2 CmvA r _t_b U&aDL-91 tbu Al e r nat l3tE- t o th e,F%_ts o r4g.Q.lgd Pro j S&: The City hereby finds that this alternative is not environmentally superior to the Project . Facts (a) This alternative would not result in the &bandomment of 22 scattered wells over a 160--acre area. Therefore, compared to the Project , it would increase the number of residences which remain adjacent to oil-producing uses . They existing wells would continue to produce oil , gas and water without the addition of the modern vapor recovery systems , secondary recovery techniques , or stake-of-they-art fare fighting equipment which will be ineviporated into the Project . The continuing use of existing technology would have detrimental impacts on air quality compared to the proposed rro,-; .act . The potential for arresting subsidence , or caus.�r!g rebound , through injection would be ' eliminated . Excess brine produced by Chevron would not be used for injection and would continue to be disposed of in the sewer system, thereby Increasing the load on the sewer system in comparison with the proposed Project . Existing facilities would not be able to withstand the ;impacts of major earthquakes . (b) This alternative also would have positive effects . It would eliminate the need :for three heavy trucks per day to travel, through the n,eighboncmd adjacent to the Project Site during the drilling phase of the Project ; would eliminate the possibility of a fire or a spill of ail or hazardous chemi cal a on the Project i to -, and would eliminate the possibility of damage to Project facilities and wails in the event of an earthquake of a ma nitude of M g or greater . This alternative also would al minate the use cf perimeter walls , which would be required . to mitigate 6estiet.i.c and noise impacts of the proposed ..Pr'oject . lit weighing the positive and negative environmental etf Pcts of this alternative, however , the City ban. determined that the positive effects of this alternative are less significant than the negative effects . (c) In a.:dition, thr,- "medium density residential development" alternative also has the adverse erviroamental impacts associats,44 With the coriatruction and occupancy of residential uni ;.a . The constriction of , 51 . k 1 . �1 r I the City and consists cat approximately 5 . 1 acres . Surrounding uses are residential (R-Z) . 3 . 9 , 2 CaMpArjaga_sf the F_fXgGt1 of the_ Alt-arnatJy9__t.Q the Effectg ..Qf tbg. ft9?"o� `toject : The City herei,y finds that this alternative is not environmeutally superior to the project . Facts in Suan„nf,+ a Find : The facilities and the wells could be wonxolidated onto one site , reducing the perimeter of the oil-producing area . However , the possibility of a •� t wrnild be increased , because all of the wells wuo�ld 9&ve to penetrate the main portion of th Inglewood-Newport fal:It . Well damage by fault mcovement, is a well-known phenomenon in the Wilmington oil field , even when no measurable earthquake has been recorded . Although surface damage to the aaelle or surface inetalLni.ons tobably woi 1d not occur , down hole damage at the fault ntercept w.. ,ild preclude the proper abandonment of the damaged we11r, , This alternative also would eliminate a dedicated park. This impact could ne partially mitigated by conducting a 14land swap" in which the Project applicant traled the Project site to the City . A park could then be established on the Project site . The park on the Project site would be smallor than the emistir;g 5 A acre site and � world consist of two separate pareel.s divided by a street , creating, an advt-,-se safety impact . 3 . 9 . 3 s.S.__ � s� _P ,i ec t Qh i oc t i Orris alteruative would meet Projrjct objectives . 3 . 9 . 4 Feaeibili : This rlternative is not feasible . Cg SuySQLt .pJ.rZ : The City djes not d ors i re to exchange McCallen Park for the Project. site . Safety issues relating to tha need to drill through the Inglewood-Newport fault make tb►is a less drisiable alternative . 3. 10 M=LMt ? ;,ITY USLMZAL IF. 3 . 10. 1 -Darript Om .al AlteraAt Neither block of the Project site would be used for oil reccwety, but instead wou d be made available for development of a sodium density res14*ntiai, developuent roji!ct . Oil recovery operations would continue at the 12 welle within the 160 Axe Ptojedt Area. At density leveUx permitted -by the rm►e r&% Pima, the project Site Gould be developed eitb 76 reiidential limi is . e Runt ington Peach Ordinance Code i� , 't . t x 1; • r Y S • t ti Parcel 3 is located at the extreme southeastern, end of the 61pr Unit and would require wells to be drilled which exceed the normal parameters of conventional dttoctional drilling . 3 .8 .2 �IoOaz'ecQn QJ the ,L, is oil t1�a_.,_Alte�:d.� thR err the ?r.Q212Oad--k=.Ject • The City heprtby finds that this &Iternative ib environmentally preferable to ache ptroject . KAW iki SU1j2QAt More buffering could be provided since the sits is lar or . Tteg parcel also has good access for truck traffte to Pesach Ptml*vard . The facilities and the velle could be icontsollated onto one site , reducing the perimeter of the all producing area . Thin could reduce the impacts of oil. I operations on surrounding residential areas . This alternative would not meet the rro ect objectives . Luis in -Su2ggtt- of Ji dn. ing: This alt;(..-native Mould not neett the Project objective of r*coven ing 9 million barrels of oil , because wells would be unable to reach the thi,aeet part of the resevoir . It i® estimated that it would result in the recovery of a maaimum of 6 million ba>r>reIL) of oil . 3 . S . 4 Le,&g k: y : This alternative 38 not feasible . Wig_ir�. .�; .av4- at P nd np: The City has been advised that. the, Huntington Beach Company ii9 platnning a surface development; on Parcel 3 where the +existing Chevron facilities are •ao longer viable, and would not be intere oted in de Layiatg this development for the 10-30 year life of tbs alternative. 'Therefore, the alternative is not "feasible" because it is not capable of being accomplished successfully in a reasonable period of time Uking into account economic , social , and legal factors+ . The alternative also would be economically Infeasible. The land costs of the alternati-e site would bt prohlbit.3vsly high because of the C-4 and k-3 sowing . No acre-for-acre scrap with, the Project site vould be possible. 30901 OMmcziRtJj. of Al„teir yg,: Parcel 4 , AcCalien potrk, is located went of Delaware Street between Yorktown Avvmare and Utica Avenue . It i e a ded i e ;te d park awned by 49 . 1 directiOnal drilling . The site is too Small for tho facilities neceRs;ry to accompany the wells . l'herefore , the Projett l'aci►lit en Site would still be used . 3 .7 .1 Q=orison at tl Zffects .1 ... 1�UetAA Y ,t s . UfactZ_Qf�_ Proponed_ PraJect : The City hereby finds that this alternative is not eriviTonmentally preferable to the Project . t�.y..is pstrt� f ind3pf: Vnd e r this alternative , there would be a greeter buffer to residential areas t and there is direct access for traffic from $tech Boulevard . However , impacts from the drilling of wells would affect residential areas and would be increased under this alternative because the wells would tequire a longer trajectory and would ti►'%e considerably longer to drill . Drilling impacts would affect the people laving in part of the Seabridge project because Parcel x is in close proximity to this development . The first phase , $@abri.dge Village , consists of 200 units . The seco%W phase , the Lakes at Se+abridge , is planned for 202 units . 3 . 7 . 3 WAttim M=U ._._- e c t Ob i =iYU: This alternative would meet the Project objectives . 3. 7 . 4 XgAlibil.i trr: This alternative is not feaeible . ral:t ,in_ 5,1p t of Fig.dinza: The Project applicant ha.s beer. advised that the property owner is planning a surface development on Parcel 2 when. the existing Chevron wells are no longer viable , and would not be interested .4n d ^la►ying this development for the 20-30 year life of this eUtern xtive , Therefore, the alternative is not "feasible" because it is not capable .of being accomplished successfully in a reasonable period of time , taking into account economic , social , and legal factos . In addition, the site configuration would not allow for the drilling of the neceseary wells , oven if the facilities were located on the raci.lities Site . I I 3 . 8 AMRHATTME SITRS' ,ZAJCJ ,._3_ 3 .8, l . _ ,ri� � cr pti n of AXttrfiativa, Parcel 3 is bounded by Memphis !Avenue on the north, KnoxviLle Avenue on the south , f`lorlda Street on the west , and Peach Boulevard on the vast . It consist$ of approximAtely 8 .2 acres and is wed.` C-4 (Mi hway Co ercial) faring Beach Boulevard and R-3 (Nadirs--High Residential) on the resainder of the site . 48 . r onl accc modato a roxinately one 24-well cellar and suchsmaller productionffn action facilities . The southeasterh wirtion df the Project could not be re+ched by d# recti.00al lls from Parcel 1 so that portion of the reservoirs could mot be exploited . 3 .d .2 sna g ` he`.,ZCfjkr . ._ of the AltagoAtIX& .t& tha Z apame � Prsriect: The City bereb finds that th is alter t4ve vould have environmental effects of a magnitude equal to those cf the Project . f' e s in _Snntitort: r lrindint : Although the area surrounding Parcel 1 currently is vacaer.t , it is proposed for residentlal use . Projfict impacts , including aesthetic impacts, the possibility oi! f ire and impacts of as X d or greater earthquake, would affect any ouch residences 3 , b .3 AM-OCtiva e,A._In lifteltiat PreJect ectiyea : This alternative would not meet Project objectives because it could only recover approximately 4, 5 at1lion barrels of oil , since injection rates would have to be loner and the Project could not be fully, developed , It would also take longer to produce the reserves . 3 . 6 . 4 ZeAgib l tw: This alternative is not feasible . PA:e .in SU9 k of .l inAi The Project i appli.caut does not own Parcel 1 . Furthermore , in order to use Parcel 1 as a surface site to drill into the southeast f part cf theptin�field iJni} , the Project applicant would have to acquire pass-through rights from the Huntington beach Company. The City has been advised that the Huntington Beach Company is planning a surface development for the 1.7 arrest site slirroundin Parcel 1 , and that it Mould not be interested in delaying tW s development for the 20-30 year life of tha project . Therefore , the alterr^.tive is not "fc. itible,' because it is not capable of being accomplished successfu111y in a Treasonable period of time, taking into account economic , social , and legal factors. 3 . 7 ALZMATIVE SITES :_ CEL 2_ 3 . 7 . 1 -Dencription al AIA1LRinativa: Parcel 2 is located on the si�mtheaat corner of Beach Boulevard and Adams Amus. It consists of approximately 3 . S acres and is **nod al : Panel 2 is located at the extreme southeastern oad of the Springfield Unit anO would require galls to be drilled which exceed the normal parameters of conventional 47 . F' A� 1 N, is also owned by the Huntington Beach Company. Althouggh this ] and is currently vacant , it is Boned for residential } use. Parcel 1 is too small to accommodate all of the facilities and well cellare necessary for an coil recovery facility . Therefore , the Project 1acilitius Site would 4till be used . Although some wells could be drilled on Parcel 1 , some vglls would still have to he drilled on the Project Brill Site . 3 . 5. 1 gaXpAr i Ben of the 18fferts of .-th(I &JterAat jXe t& the its of, , tri tops_AreA_ 'fit: The City hereby finds that this alteri3ativc ' a not environmentally superior to the Project . arAI_ D gpport_ of riXidiug., Approximately 60% of the wells for the Project could be drilled on Parcel 1 . Although this would result in a slight reduction in the effects of the drilling phase on the neighborhood ovrrounding the lProJect , drilling world affect two residential. neighborhoode instead of one . Although the � arw•a surrounding Parcel 1 currently is vacant , it is � proposed for residential. use . 3 .5 . 3 t. eas s e i oL JCSeg x!Q i s to This alternative would meet project objectivea . 1 3 .5 . 4 EggB,i.hilily: This alternative is not feasible . C•U �.1n Sunk o" ._ of! P r diva`s : The Project applicant does not own Parcel 1 . Furthermore , in order to use Parcel 1 as a surface site to drill into the southeast part of the Springfield Fait , the Project applicant would have to acquire pace-through Frights from -.,,be Suntington beach Company. The City ! ,as been advis d that the Runt, ngton Beach Company is plrn:.ng a suirtace development for the 17 acres site surrounding Parcel 1 . and that it mould ntt be interested in delaying this development for the 2n ;o year life of the project , Theref'oices the s2teyrnative is not "feasible" because it is not capable of being accceplished succeerfullpy in a reasonable period of time , ta&irg ixto account economic ,, social , and legal. Uctors . 3 .g •1 f.i Li �. !__.A 4rx�a i A project desi ned to be solely developed from Parcel 1 would need to be reduced in size considerably. The 1 . 8 acre site would 46 . h •r r S I of oil which could be produced from 9 million barrels tO sero barrels . 3 .4.4 ty.; This alternative is not feasible . Fast .tea SU22o r t : it is highly unlikely that (a) oil operatcrs would all agree to abandon their operations . and that Cb) ready purchases would be available for all of the sites . Therefore , in order to F implement this alternative , the City probably would have to acquire the mineral rights for some or all of the wells and ay for the abandonment of the site . Some arrangement would have to be made with the surface owner s following reimbursement Of all or part of the City resale and/or development of the sites . 3 . 4. 4 ,lity: 7 ' alternative i e not feasible . racts is„ Su220-1,t r inrlinge : it in highly unlikely that (a) oil operators would all agree to abandon their Operations , and that .Cb$ _e dy purchasers in would b e availabe� for �:11 of the sites . probably would haves implement this &lternative , the City p y to acquire the miners] rights for some oa all of the wells and pay for the abandonment of the site . some arrangement wguldreimbursement have uree o be made h the ' for ement mentof all or part of the C ty' s c ete following reirsb resale and/or development of the sites . As a rough estimate , tieing the industry standard 1 cf $15, 000 per average curly barrel of oil prod : it world cost app"oximately $1 . 5 million to acquire the mineral rights for a1.1 of the Bites . Abandonment would cast approximately $ . � million . This alternative the mine so would deny access to the royalty owners o al estates . even assuming that mineralthe doests couli be not assign purchased for $1 . 5 mullion, this figure an value to unrecovered reserved , wich are worth in the tens of &illiono of dollars This alternative does not app ea,. to be ',feasible. " 3 . 5 ALIZARAUME 9 TIES LPARCEL l 3 .5 . 1 Rege r3ation of Alternative: Parcel i consiets of 1 ,8 acrds located to the notthwart of the Project site on pia@ Street , bounded by "Yorktown Avenue on the north and Utita Avspue on the soth.m�t�teralsPbalawttbep *urlace.ant oe The t own the surface or thep,s rcel 1 yunti�ton Beach Company omp is the i5 mineral acree f fee .land which In surrounded by approximately 45 . ,, t rrr r finds that the "more intense drilling program" alternative it not anviroamentall,y superior to the project . Facta Supom lindi": (a) Approximately twice as many heavy trucks per day (6 instead of 3) would be required for the iutensified rrilling program. Two 165 , rigs would be used instead of one, resulting in increased aesthetic impacts and soaking It more difficult to control noise and light/glare impacts . (b) The Project site would be occupied for oil -producing facilities for a slightly Oorter perior of time , because the inteeuxvified drilling program would reduce the construction period by several months . Impacts of the drilling phstse: , including ;;he noise and traffic :L iactd (althouth Intensified ) , also would occur over a slightly shorter time period . When weighed aga,wnst the more severer and unmitigable impacts that would occur , however , this reduction in the drilling period does not outweigh the negative impacts of this alternative . 3 . 3 . 3 rfXCCtJyenegg in. Meeting._PrDjact obitcti 1`tae "more intense drilling program" alternative would meet the Project objectives . 3 . 3 . 4 FedffibilitY : The "mare intense drilling program" is feasible , but would be Tore expensive than this proposed Project . 3 . 4 ADAWM=_.QZ_+ALL OIL BRODUCE' 3 . 4 . 1 pgMcziRt_2;M 12f 1'.l ria_tiXC : Under thia alternative , the oil facilities on the Project site would be removed and 22 scattered wells over 160 acres would be abandoned , as under the proposed Project . The Project site and the 6 scattered sites would be avaf.lable for other uses . ites identi3l use is designated in the General Plan mead Zoning . 3 . 4 . 2 Cam, them _Altsrnativer__ ta ., fta • The City hrerob finds that - this alternative s environmentally ptaieera is to the lFrojovk b*cause it would eliminate the effect of oil-producing uots throughtor+t the Project Area. 3 . 4.3c. ,j,rrenass in m ,et e Objectiltsm: This alternative would not result in the recovery of any oil tme subsurface reserves . Therefore , it would not most trier Project objectives . It would reduce the amount 44 . c ��.�I.i Min N •r! 4. i,'. '.L •..,_. _... _.•,,.... �,� _..._,, ...,,. :. .:,... .. •_.—,,._ ._.. :. _„ 'i M.MMMVhM•YYLY+F1r.b+.`.i`...wtir �H..... ...... . ..v..w.,.a.,,,...... . . .._. . . . ... .. and Would aliminute the possibility of damage to Project facilities and walls in the event of an earthquake of A spa nitude of M8 or greater . This alternative also would altmi,nate the use of perimeter walls , which would be required to mitigate Aesthetic and noise impacts of the proposed Project . In weighing the positive and negative effsc,ts of ibis alternative. , however , the City has determined that the positive effQcts of this alternative are less signifi,Ant than the negative effects . 3 .2. 3 z1for-dvalleas : Meatiliff 'xof eCt ph i ectives : 1•he reduced intensity alternative would not sweet Project objectives because it would Prot result in optimum well spaclag for inje&:tion . As a result , only approximately 3 . 5 million barrels of oil would be recovered . 3 . 2. 4 rdsibil The reduced intend ty alternative is not feasible . F This alternative would require acquiring the right--of--way fox a tonviderable length 'of underground pipes . Liab:.lity for these., pipes could be significant . According to the Project applicant , the capital costs of this slter. ativc. would be approximately the same as the capital costs o the proposed Project , while less than cane-half as much oil would be recovered . lr, addition, this alternative would not result in optimum spacing of injector wells . If secondary recovery did not: work under this eyetem, there would be no way to determine the source of the problem or to cure the situation. Based on these factors , the praject applicant has concluded that this alternative in not economically feasible . This alternative also is not feasible because it is not desirable, and may not be possible , to conduct well reworking in very close proximity to residential. unitc . 3 . 3 KQRE INTIM$1 URILLINfi M RAM . . 1 ,....Al Under this #1ternativet the osed Fro ect would rocee.' as derctibed -sa thisVIXOR! except that the drilling ro ram s+auid be` intensified to reduce the time span 01 the drilling phase of the Project . A neeond rig would be used for drilling . The two -year drilling period would be reduced by saweral months . 3 . 3 . 2 Qmgarinan of the- tf� ._.SLt.. , Altesna iya t t -afact2 of the P'ropased._ The City hereby 43 . • in_Aff : The oono project', alternative would not most Project objOctives because it world not permit the recovery Of a 0111i0a bgr rely of crude oil by using secondary recovery t@cbnfques . l[i st in oil op"rationr would only recover approximately 500 ,001 barrels of crude oil . 3 . 1. 4 Dam ibility: The "no pro ject'c alternative is feasible. 3 . 2 $=�CFD I IfiNS1Tit WaSHMATM 3 . 2 . 1 pes riVna..aw8?,.$ernatie : The "reduced intensity" alternative would involve drilling a number of limitud injector wells for secondary oil recovery , while retaining all existing -wells currently operating in the 160-acre subsurface unit . Approximately la injector wells would be drilled from one of the existing well sites . 3 . 2 . 2 its a r i aon o ._t.ki-M e n t e Q f-t he -�.01C AW e -10 thC Eff-ect6 ,j2f the ro jec-t: The City hereby f it de that this alternat iv"e is not environmentally superior to the Project . )EAttfi iD SUR201t Qf FiD_di. : i (an) The "reduced intensity" alternative would not result in the abandonment of 21 scattered cells over a 160-acre area. Therefore , compared to the proposed Project , it would increase the number of residences which remain adjacent to oil--producing ueea . Some of these residences are within 20 feet of existing wells ; therefore , these residences wold be less buffered from the noise impacts of reworking the wells . This impact would be particularly siguificant in the Villa St . Croix site , in which five wells are located writ.hin 20 feet or less of cendominium units . This alternative also woull require routing high- Pressure water through lengthy ppipelines under City streets . The potsihi1ity Cof reakaage or rupture is a significasit adverse impact which would not exist under the proposed Pro9+sct . Existing futilities would not withstand a s&jor 6ar't quake. M , This alternative also would have positive effects . it would eliminate the need for three heavy t tucks per day to trawl through the neighbocbood adjacent to they Project Site durin the drilling phase of the Parofect ; would eliminate they possibility of a fire or a &pill of oil or hazardous chemicals on the project. Site ; 42 . r M" I r •sfA1f t� r ' 1 j ' .J . a 3 . 1 . 1 R iptijM n1. A te�rnative ; The SIR deliver the %#no project" a teenative xii the maintenance of azia:ing conditions . 3 . 1 .2 s ma t n of +,:he Me* snat ive to the zftec o Of � �s� 's. t : The City heroby f!n de tbalt. no project alternative 3s not environmentally superior to the Project . Fact t_An gus-O rt nt zind,,,ng.. (a) Th' s AltieMstive would not result in the abandonment of 22 sca.ttered wells over a 160-acre area . Therefore , Compared ;:o the Project , itwould increase the ` number of residenct'?a which remain adjacent to rail--producing uses . The existing welle would continue to producer oil , gas and water vithout the addition of the modern vapor recovery systems , secondary recovery tachniquea , or state--,1 -the-•art fire lighting equipment which tell be inrori,orated into the Project . The continuing use of eh;fisting technology would have detrimental impacts on air quality compared to the proposed Project . The potential fog arresting aubridence , or causiull rebound , through ln; ection would be eliminated . Xxcess brine produced by Chevron would not be used for infection and would continue to be disposed of in the fever system, thereby Increasing the load on the eewe4 r system in +cc aparisor, with the proposed project . Existing facilities would not be able to withstand the impacts of major earthquakes . M Thit alternative also would have positive effects. It would eliminate the need forthree heavy trucks per day to travel through the neighborhood adjacent to the Project Site dux 'n the drilling phase of the peat ect would eliminate t1e possibility of a sire or a dpill of Trail or tuagrdous cbesi,cals obi the pro eat i tad 1d erlisinate the posl ibility of d e to tiro ect : f tlts�tf+rs wale ire the -wont of ao dam of a NAMitUdO Of N g or greater . this alternativv also would e1101114Me the use of periweter Wa11S Wbich wcm1d be re vis*d t* Oti.xate Aerthetle and noise impacts of the tr '° .fie ad Pro ect , In wei i test 40viroewre effrete of bis� alter�ttvet hod zseiat h e MY has d6tet wined that the positive effects r tbiee r.ltetA&ttve art lever significant than the neSativre effects . e1 , ti'r r 1p years . Capacity in the school diertri�ct currently v esceeds student enrollment , and e sChOOIG situated topW�i orb the project are particularly well additional eArol.,ment . P1.0jected incleased to he bxc�s cap�►city ,llment even from the Project do not exceed t, taking, into account the increase in enrollment expectsd from other projects . approved � (b) The fatal member nf studente from and f proposed projects , including JProjeet rCl& for e dition$ *Union is 171 new students , Snrallmeat projeC r School District schoo' s shows a decrease in enrollment until 1990. An i,ncr*aee is projected from the through expected 1995 . Evert with new developments howe�ex Increase in students fxo 992 to dec1 ne 9 in In not enrollmentob�tween conp ensaice for the expected 19d7 and 1992 , (c) An increase in dwelling ur�itts does nc. necessarily result i.xa an increase in enrollmerlt . From 1975 to 1187 , an additional 9 , 223 new swellings were constructed and occupied iw .tiS hoo�.the �3strict�bouiadares The of �et suntington Beach. Unix impact on enrollment was a minuf3 3 , 141 aft-.dents , a 37% decrease . a. 'M1 40 . k Pr,+ yq , r yy .WµWJM WJ.JI„r•..r...r. .i ..,.... r. M' viciuit of the Drill Site and hacil.itY Site could exceed City no so standards r eb crakes finding (1) . The City ber �y raACta in Support of Finding A1 . 9 . 1 hereby, are incorporated by reference . (b) The sweasteresient of noise is . by def :initiun, a "Cwanlativ"J" saaturement . it takes into , a�to unt 1 bac rOund noire , by condr+inning the ProJect p Y vitb the City ' rt Noisy Ordinance ,not ran i tug ea a significant cumulative noise ievelw wi.� adverse impact . Z . �.4 . ,oaLiAl �: Arr, a secondary effect of the with the 57 Prq eewt . automobile- emissions kAN the�p�� ' erct � growth dwelling unite w�ri �, cotist tti v and inducing ;mpact in c-injuaction with yre,3ellt . aopro ed Proposed deve1cpsent , cotil.d re aul t in alverre Impacts on air quality. F.Ad ll: -Che City hereby makes finding (I) (r�) It is estimated that vehicle emissions M constituting a second*ry viva, of the Project would result in a daily increase in Vehicle amiusidns of 31 59fi . 3 pounds per year . Amy 1 r �f t�me� b m the eim,pro�rementein emissions is offset inea r y' Y air quali q ceused by replacement of exi,rting old ail storage! tankA with new tionke fully eqaipyad With an effective vapor re,;ove+rx s�►Ntera. she Project will, zesuit in a net reduction. of 41, A.98 pounds of hyarocarin+one per a: year . Z . 1d. 6 ,20t 7-116WAs a secondary itmpaCt of the � ZAA1 rawth inducing px0Jecte the 57 ualts w0hicYa constituth t'i�C g effect of the Project Could generate additi<)nal school chixdrens otenttall ► p causing adverse effects on the scboo1 eyotem . • rindigg The City hereby makes finding (1) . �q ji (a) Huntington Beach city schools have experiencing a steady declinle in enrollment. ovear the p ds d�; `N'F 1 , ,,i � .. t•"1f I Y •fI RI' 1{• 1 , . A 2. 14.2 ,blontial R : In c=Junction with present , ap 0r0"d Ond K"Osed developments 1,n the City, the ee0oadary trxfs effects of the induced growth from the ftojeet ccald result in negative i0paCts on 'the CICC UticM systen. The City Wreby makes f, ind;itrg (1). 11WtX in gu St Of rUdi ve Cb? Oto�h i-Reed by the Project is controlled by auftertt Pan policies relating to land use designations ad cUculati a 3s►provemen.te . The laud use designations 00e4 to Seurat* ie#timates of secondary Uaffic Impacts ` from itkduced gtoath are consistent with the current 04attal flan designation . Therefore , tto traffic 1puOrAted by those uses has been taken into &Ccount in establishing the General Plan circulation plan of arterial ertsttt# and highways, This playa adequately accommodates traffie erti aced. to be generated by General Phan desix"ted uses. (b) A teceat traffic atudy Conducted for 'the wat'tsfrlst which t':alugtea Cumulative traffic levels for the axe# ok the cit • Mort likely to reveive heavy tz ffic floWt' from PrOPOS*d deVexcpm ent , Mfiread that traffic Brill, 9porate at . acceptable l.evein of service . W The 100 vehicles whieb would bt ae jociated with the 57 units that eb astitute the growth inducing effect of t pf�Dject represent a very small iacrwout • of the new veh1Cx0N„t4t viil be within the area. 2 . 14.3 Potential ZU t : In conjunction with presents approved and proposed projects, tra.•fic resulting from growth' enetated by the Project say add to noise levels ad9acen to eirculatlon routes . . ndings : The City hereby makes finding (1) , rActt �� (a) Isipl.e"atation of the optima Naive Levels, and Of the Viide Abatement Plan for Traffic poise _untal.ned in voctions' 1.3 .3 and 2 . 1 .4 of the General Plan noise Slemeat.. will mitigate these cumulative impacts to a level of infignificance. - 1 . 14. 4 Pstarit..i4JL_&tLj&t; in conjunction with existing , approved and proposed future projects , noise within the i lT . r r i 0 rJUAIA"; The City hereby sukkes finding (1) . (a) The 158 pbrsons who would be housed on the r: Pero set site re ar.esent$ a population factor of only 0 .08% of the estisated 18:37 City population. (0) The Project will utilize two entire City blacks for the approxisiatily 20-30 year life of the pro j anet:t . D,%Red on existing VensTa l Plan and zoning designa► ie ; Jut tot the Pro�ect , both of the two Project blocks would be used for residential purposes . under ezistian x0ning, 1.08 feeidential asits ' could be constructed on t o site . Eaeed on ezisting .general plan designation. 76 unite could be built on the cite . Therefore, the growth induicing effect of the. Project cotild be leer than the number of units that could be doveloped on the Project site . 2 . 14 G12MATTYX IMPACTS 2 , 14. 1 J ;J,ZZfect: Two other oil consolidation pro ectr are In the process of assembly Within the vat atty of the h.,-Oject . The cumulative effects of these pro wits could have iaapacts on subsidence and gas leaks . mall: The City hereby makes finding (1> . (a) The facts in support of rinding 2 . 1 .2 , describing the effect of the project on subsidence, hereby are Incorporated by reference. (b) The facts in support of rinding 2 . 10. 5 , describing the effect of water flooding on gas leaks , hereby are incorporated by reference . (c) In the Wilmington Field , water flooding took place in an area wbere many well$ were damged badly and not properly abandoned . Even with this large number of ias to early r bsndoned wells ,, there weire no problems with inlscted. fluids or oil or gas surfacing via these conduitti . (d) The Signal Hill field was uaitiared and three water floods initiated in 1974 . Many of the wells in this field are as old as the Huntington Reach wells; however , the Division of till g Gas has received notification of only two wells that have leaked . 37 . SPA mom t � sripbss ,1 wall@ aft still not be visibl* to The Vfoject will ret*Ire tbxo* IJ MCI �ers o Pablo phone on each pa�rtel . It IN is tbu ►t c ra "ti line between they two ads +pill be �r�r t in the ter o ryst", fi t: Ifte City bogeby makes f inning (1) . I 1 e . the Gew s;4 Telephone Compapy provides telephone s tyles- to the City and to the Project site . No current *1«iet in the system. The number of limes •ersvici the project site s lose that the number of to @Mbid ►l be �t4 uired it sodium deneity► al 06its Voc.0 domloped on site, 1 .1 201201 Dri11i V-4 w and roduction nil . , MAU it elsct;ic RAMS onelectric d +l.'�'1 a<w t of n�ttu�r*l has will be V. tegd wt.. ire oil.; a4d i t renal natural des may bit ' to .red for psoduction. , 'he City hereby nuskes tindin8 M . k, ate, �u �p! (a' Ptoper aiming of the well pus pr will save enerty thconp reducing the asoust of electricity used . (b) Southern C*lilornl dean aLaticippates wo r:�bleeas in to 12din elett'itical setvica Of t'hd Pro;�ecto R00 foleftie , s . c ich Mill �rovide any i G� its also antidpat s no JI. p u b eea�a pr( a elia ervMolor the IftaJotto The r ► * of the Troj ect is to produce upproac wmterI 9. Sillica► barrels of crude oil. . 1 . 12.1 , act: Compared to exisrti ecMaitiones the Pra act will have a growth inducingotapact of 57 units . Al the City-vide aver& a of 2 .78 pO rson$ per houeehold * the 57 dweilia►8 vn ite wou d house 15 ptrronet . 36 . �M '.Y��.44 A.\b-,r.augr.•W rh ,.r.... ., r ... . , •"''r�" . .1 2.lii4 WgpSjmj Mfgct: During time initial drilling xcation, a fresh water demand of 21 ,000 gallons per day ""eted . Following completion of the driliin b�►$t o tM water co1#s ptton tote will be reduced to 1 $ 00� per dayb The City bereby m*es finding (1) $ (a) !itch water use over the long term is roughl y uirraxtnt to as Industrial use one-third of an acre In seTst, or abet 6 attached res14ontial unit• . Adequate water supplies exist to matt this demand . The available s fire flow is 5 ,500 gallons per minute with 3 ,000 gallons per mute being the required fire flow at present . a,. 2. 11. . 5 XQtgnt4&j Eft-mg!t: During the drilling phase. one track per day normally will be required to collect A&A transport liquid' OLL Wastes and one truck at day will. be re aired to bandit solid waste collected rin medal bins . roflowing the .completion of dril."Ung. the volume of Wastes w411 be reduced , articularly for solid wastes such as drill cuttings. Ae eriodic cleaning of tanks during the operational phase will require the removal of sludge from task bott4*8. ., The City hereby smoke$ finding (1) . facts in Input at risidim : The fallowing measures will mitig&W the ideatifiel! impact to a Level of ine iginf icance . (a) Duning operations for 01.1 field wastes are normally hangled by contract airvice firma that specialize iA Waste disposal of thin type. specib) Sludge from tank botto @ will be deposited in a j al dump a ulped to handle thin type of waste, and deposited is a Glaser 1 landfill , (c) All waste matetiall , both liquid and solid, shall be collected and separated on site , temporarily stored in medal buns and tanks , and trucked to appropriate disposal sites . I (d) ' Liquid vast :s shall be collected and stored in closed tanks to prevent the opread of odors prior: to disposal . (e) Collection areas !or waste shall be located 35 . ON.., ,, stoaas* tasks @ball have pre-plu►sbed foam 16jest on systesar and exterior deluge water spray systems . The foam storage area and foam quantity shall be the fits Depertuent , and fire hydrants shall late is areas a roved by the fire Department, s in gulf ids deteRG systems approved bar the Fire a i ►t e414 0e installed on the pro Oct -perimeter sit fire WIT approved �y the Kite 3epaartnent db i tal104 thoroushou�t tic Site . All ate 11-fte most be 2e feet in width and Installed in compliance wit# litre Department Specification 403 . (b) A, fell vapor recovery system shall be installed , as required by SCAQMD. (1 ) Only three on-site crude oil tanks are permitted, vhIch shall never be completely full at once . (j ) Fact (0) in support of Finding 1 . 2 . 1. describing emergeacy action sad spill prevention plans , hereby is incorporated by reference . M Prior to termination of the oil operation, a plan shall submitted tot the review and approval of the ire � Department ad Development Services Departmout, showing how the Site will be abandoned and rostoted to its closest natural state. att : ps;vfng of the Fso j set site will increase storavator, which could present additional demands on the .ever systen. ZinAiggl: The City hereby makes finding (1) . (a) Time racts in Support of Finding 2 . 2 . 1 hereby are incorporated by reference . (b) - The Project will take about 30,000 berrels per day of produced water from Chevron, which is currently dumping approximately 40 ,000 barrels per day into the sanitary sever . T'aerefore, instead of adding more brine to the aever system, this Project will relieve the system of about 30 ,004 barrels per clay . 34 , `An Y 1 . 1 *�l bydcar t0ic arv311 1eanticipated asily t ontrolli� r �x� � .lJow Therefore , &1 ticipa ed epbsu pga ��• will. be c* calned by the wei lit of the nd . id ocelf , the open collars will allow the Tire { Ot" to 400001 it dice that surfaes, with"t #Qa tag Iy 4 1 AWCs.., .. l �: The Project could increase the demand on o ice protection servvice# , including potential increases in wandalisz and noiss nuisa.nce complaiatr . �+ gaga: The City hereby makes finding (1) . ZACt�in fiUgRU1t oX l� : The following measures will ■itigatt&e the identified- impact to a level of r' ,�nRi.hn!licance. (a) The proposed site will be enclosed witb a decorative masonry wall and with a landscaping beta. The wall and landscaping will avoid providing easy access to the $its . 1 r' (b) TW facts in, Support of y'indin� "2. p. 1, relating to noise implets , hereby are incorpo�rmt by reference. t•.it. : The potential for lire, odor of spill incidents could increase the demand on fire preventiontprotection services in the City. Zi,RAIcga; The City hereby makes f iad ing (1) . Wte In SUR299t a!, !' nd4 e: (a) The dire Depirtment has stated that it will actvally have a reduced workload due to the consolidation of many all producing sites onto oaoi fully equiped and protected Site . (b) An on-situ flare suppression system whall be installed as a primary source for fire protection. (c) . Oil wells sball be provided with gas detection systems from cellars to 24-houte monitoring locations . r (d) Vre extinguishers approved by the mire Department mart be installed within 75 feet of travel . (e) Metal open-grate covers sball be provided over the top of well cellars . 33 . _- r •J I{. MOW r v •': s r r00imrs drop will trigger an slam and shutdown the r �p�p so This ll **sure that aay release of s'iAl�l. �e trenches will be left o on at nillbt and .. lovet's fed feet of pipeline will be Rafted , s od iuopected and trench back-filled in one day. ri ta? barriers will ensure that odostris►Qs do t oh trenches . This to standard orsting pros la n the construction of underground p pelinest I . 10 . 5 Potentialerect : Oil-related gas leaks could lead to fire or szplosion. • The City hereby makes finding (1) . Facts In SutiMQrt of Find nee : (a) A report sadt by GeoScience Analytical +. Inc . (X6boiti. Report) deternined that a Los Asseles fire and 0 010s bn was caused by gas that was biogenic, or the result of bacterial decay, not related to a looking ligeline or poorly abandoned oil woll. It was also etermi ned that only one of the ql gas samples analysed in �tiagton peach was petro nic , or associated with oil . 4e61.2 it --a-Alves subsequently taken in puatington Zeacb veto dotossfted to be of biogenic origin. These studies Judit#ted that the roblem of methane %&a has*rd does not bares" #ts soots is 0 1 field-related activity. fib) Water flooding in an oil reservoir reduces the AMMAt of free gar and lessens the possibility of gas looks . A9W free gar flows to areas of low ressare. Producer wells *sa areas of low pressure* an� as will flow there thr*v pout the process of repriatrvr sat da.. In action wells will be located away from poorly abandoned w to a4d in close proximity to producing wells , enpugtng tkat firod. gas *ill flow to the producing wells . (c) A contingency plan shall be submitted to the nuntingum leach rise Department for review dad approval, with state, to be taken In the even: that leakages !toms any abandoned wells which do not meet present day abandorment irequironsut• finds its way to the surface. (d) . The possibility of fire and/or explosion at the drill rigs does not constitute a significant Impact because the drilling equipment will be equipped with Class III blow7at prevention equipment . Additionally; the reservoirs of :he Project are well known having been produced for over as years . The reservoir pressure is 31 . 4 I 1 �:pureed a iie of am-ba"tdou• additives to votary crud . go ip nothing to tbo Nuati too peach oil 110td O*!lli historythat would i ficate that hasardovs Ms3 o will be tatut redo Therefore l to the S9e00et ingo*' :,0o ibis tk* optrator of the Project •hall use' -,hah d s Uditixe• in the pro� drilling drills =do hf , 2 . 10. Crude oil will be transported in to exi evraa polite from the Ifteilit Site to Chevron's ire-pa stab An. There is a possibility of pipeline rupture . The City hereby makes finding (1) . mod., in 'n ,sorti cat �ind�gs (a) The addition o: the Project ' s oil stream will reduoe pressure on the Chevron crude oil pipeline , htceuse the oil free the Project will enter the lipeline at a Nisbet tea exature than the oil currentlyn the ieue�e. it will 'reduce the viscosity of the oil . This h tuft will reduce ptossure in the pipelines thereby 4acrotei the possi .ility of pipeline rupture when ceasedo -exi st iug coned i t i ons . Jb) if the pipeline rupptured tyre aai oil thatWiel be **leased would be the O l in the pipeline between block valves . Automatic shutdowns Mould keep the incremental volume of oil attributable to the Project at ai► insignificant level in the event of pipeline rupture . � (0 Chevron completed hydrotesting its pipeline In th l40 to a pressure of 750 pounds per sq% snob. ' toot was vitnesses and apg�roved for the State Fire WOW by fhe Karin Corporation on March g. 1988. 1 . 10.4 EQUA1141 Ufa&: The rupture of the Mates filyslins, Oi4ccidents tosulting from . pedesttian &eta s' to reachas during the construction of the water pipeline. could have public safety impacts . I rindinva: The Ctty hereby use finding (1) . . 1racto in Sylpatt of • (a) , The Facts in Support of Finding 2 .2 •3 . describing aeaeares mitigating any impacts on crater quality, hereby are incorporated by rererence . (b) The water pipeline will be monitored with automatic shutdown prea.,ure sensors , so that any sudden 31 , Y. 1 elO edt* each pi ecs of equipment in the system. The A hratins procedures sxaaual shall lain In detail how to ;Baeb pieee at equipment � aclode emerge»cy ; . mod e p shut-dawn of equipment And notification of 2 .10.2 20"�ent Elf get: Various chess Wa , both non- +err a AMae rdoup, are utilised In oil sad gas at , r. production. Cbemicals may be used to enhance the Mid properties during drill of oil and gas wells , e► dxation of the crude oil to aarhetable quality, to inhibit cotsosion, scabs and baterial levels, and 3n tr*atswent of the produced water to suitable reinjection dual i ty s r.imalnu: The city hereby makes f lading (1) . The following smsuree will mitigate the identified impact to a level of insridnifitance. (a) None of the chemicals used for the Project will be used in large quantities , or vouH ever be used off of the 2 Project sites . (b) A.11 federal and state regulation# . including Wor"a and commom4ty disclosute pro Taus , ' Site Business Bret Ono Plans , Preposition 65 warnings , hazard l�abellin� AM ill Proventior; control g Countsrmea�stTe Plans , shah. be fully enforced . (c) Fact (c) in Support of finding 1 . 2 . 1 , describing "otgency action and spill prevention plane , hereby is • incorporated by reference. (d) If a localized spill of haxordous materials should occur , it world be contaiue4 in the area and no impact would occur outeide the Site boundaries . ftocedures to mitigate imparts to on--site workers shall, be Included in the Operations Manua. . W The Facts in Support of Finding 2. 10. 1 , desCribing the containment of materials on the brill Site and yacilitF Site, hereby are incorporated by reference . (f ) The State Department of gealth Services has 30 . {4i r;r 1 • y , ' i k• � I z' •r .ti �.. a. . The potential exists for oil OV4118 !tees$ valves. tans and o dirmt aa►d is the moll r�mousits of crude oil wt+ic� will to 04d co the facility Site in storage tanks . Wdlops The City hereby sakdi fiw4ing (1) . ,Asa: The f oll*ritsg agapuse 4111 sa tigate the dentif ed impact to a level of imeificamce. (a) If an oil spill occurred during a rainstorms surfacer drainage water could become contaminated with crude oat The Drill Site and Facility Site have been d s sped to provide containment of surface fluids such as It aster. and in emetgenoy conditions, cards oil . The I toe *hall be ofnclosed with masonry walls which provide 4 kite control of surface gluide . All truck gates and lag : gates *hall have raised thresholds with either f d twws or raised stoops which ppreclude surface i~ s from leaving the Site. All surface fluids ehali be diverted to catch basins . t, ;, ( ►� The sects in Support of rindiag 2.2 .1, describing t averdioa 0 surface fluids to catch basins , hereby t la'zoirgotst*d by reference. (c) It, the tanks ruptured and spilled oil, the cam .NW—At Area for spill will contain ape rozinately i►�. atuuic feat , al*ost two times tihe minimum Volurtie rw' rated by the State Division of Oil g dam . The co taiment asrta is below ggrade , agproxiaately d feet lower 'than the water processing area and 6 feet lorser than ,the adj� Set street level . The contaizoent area will coutaIn . ol1 spilled from tasks . 4) The koject will use all new pipelines, valves,fitt.I , tanks and equipments . All linert Vill moot the i vents at the Sttaa of California1 l Pipeline Soto Act . All items will be totected against corrosi on by` 4 or sore of the f62lowinspalyin� cloride coating onexterior buried pipeliaos , cathodc protection eYst am, ..paint coating on all above-ground pipelines and equipment . *ROSY coating on interior of grater processing tanks , and use of stainlese steel fittings . (a) An Operating Procedures Manual shall be prepared for the training of all new employees . Each operator shall be required to thoroughly understand and be able to 29 . x tw io'. n. P a ftill $its betwM the li tss of 1000 p.m. and 4. saes ftX arrrrgency pv*poses doolots acoustical bla *et melosare shall be at a�doar entrrwcss. Makorst load bells or bussers shall betM a h Sudden b.agk fr uency noise shall be kept to a mini1 by Uki*S mbbes lived pipe' eidvators if necessary' imad *bow tirep to absorb the impact of tubulars being tall' onto tft walk in prepaxation for running casing. ' Acoug ical b1&n eta Oall be used to reduce thin type of ximatking noire to insignificant levels . n. (i) All drilling gigs and productions wells shall be operated by electrical motors and electric pumps only. No r maig rncy generator shall be used . ( � Double WmIflers shall be used on production hoist dud earth ooving, equipment, further reducing the ' impact to •tbo ne i hborhood. t Nell service *Igo shall be operated no more than 48 deys et Year b4tweet 7 : 64 a.ta. &ad i t 00 p a m A or O A t re . whites �: is shorter . No more than 4 well des �r "y $e Otbe pr+stio*s at any one time. The serv�,,9,1 t smell exceed 120 feet in height and shall be d 1a f i dOW utilize acoustital blankets . (1) The 14-bour drilling phase shall not operate for longer than two years . 2ot-2 PAURUAI X art,: A backhoe will be used during, t bo ebastiiattion of the hater pipeline. rind The City hereby sues finding (1) . ►} '2WM610 mufflers will be used on backhoes during the chnsttvction of the water pipeline , Bad workmen will be cautioned to work as quietly as passible . (b)• MY residual noise impact Will not be significant because it will be temporary in nature and will only occur daring the day. Residents of each block will only be affected for approximately one day. 28 . 1 a' 1 Raw !J4 h i•r i r r . ,S Poise sMitoties shall be conduct d upd&x the Pot U- Sion of s acoustical !. pie; Ot i the ore Orange RSports sha �a sa�+rrxtted to the of 9*0g t lervice s withl t ices n�rtki days p,,• t. . the c srt�o arrah haeat of Ne monitoring effort. The Iranitosing shall include the following: i° (1) Prior to the start of the Atilling phase. noise ■easaxeeents ' O , be obtained during the operation of the s tic drilling sitwhieb has been selected and t wouseweatr shall be related to those which iftIl be Meriopeed at the nearest residential 6dadarieds to the drilling site. In a4ditidn, the noise contral measures which have been, or will beg applied to the rig as needed for Gese►pli��►nce with the Noise ordinance shall be aderrtilied. (1) ;fit,-.. I40ise aOasvxwents shall be obtaitred ut the nighttime hours (10:00 g'P%# to 7 :00 a.m. ) or at least six hours oo *at of three nights vitbin the lure Olk�rr 112Oviod ifthe start of the drilling #bass. Laitoring x at the Asatest residential boundary to the actual drilling operation, -The noises h+srml. data shall be comp&red to noise lerreLI dPecified in the Noise Ordinance Wherean a=46ie of the Otdiftance is identifiedlo noise control measures sba11 be a plied and an additional two nights of monitoring shall, be required . (3 «, pai,s• munitoxi shall Ocoer anting a e -bour period botwoon1lie hours ftom 10:00 P.M. to 7 : 00 a.m, at least once each mouth during the Drilling Pbase of tho Project . The noise level data obtained shall be conpated to the noise Ordinance standatdo . 'There an exceedance of the standards is identified notst control measures shall be applied and an additional two nights of monitoring shall be required. (e) r Truck traffic shall be limited to the hours between 1 : 00 a .m. and 5 :00 p.m. No trucks shall hark on the street , and truck deliveries shall be staggered so that no truck will wait in the street for longer than five minutes . :"here shall be no entrance or *sit of vehicles 27 . �Y k 'TAw!I' 1 I Y I ^ r (b) The Ptoject will eliminate eairtint tanks that are totally uncontrolled for air pol lutont emissions , iaeludial bessene . Thirefore , Project probably will fo"It in a net reductiou in ehvironnnental risk from e emissias in the project Area . . (a) South Coast Air Qualit Management District At roved vapor recovery systems stall be used for tames in o l contact . (d) Low-level , short-term exposure to benuene is not subject to SCAQHD proposed rules , because such eVosures are not thought to constitute a health risk. In tie event of an on-rite spill, the system Is designed to pump the ,spilled fluid back through the separation system and into the tannic. Spills would be contained on site . 2 .9 HQ161 2 .9. 1 f.gntlal ,ZZfect: Oil well drilling ane pumping operations , production wastes and earth mowing equipment , a04 repair/maintenance ayyuipment will generate noise which coold affect residences in the area of the Project. n IrInAlaSK • The City hereby sak+ev finding (1) . atein SugRgzt of lindin a ,. The following measures will mitigate the identif ed mpac" to a level of ins ignif ica►nes o (a) The Project shall fully comply with they MuntlaSton Beach Noise Ordinance (Ordinance No. 2379) . (b) A rspoyrt prepared by an acoustical engineer certified by the County of Oranges shall be submitted' to the Director of Development Services for review and Approval prior to commencing drilling. The report shall describe noise levels at the Project Site property line and at the nearest residential property lines , both with and without acoustical treatment on the drilling rig and service rigs . The report shall indicate: noise attenuation measures necessary to assure compliance with the Runtington Beach Noi*rs Ordinance (Ordinance No . 2379) . This shall include the provisions of the ordi.narce regarding a maximum hourly average noise level of 50 dB(A) during the bourn from 10 : 00 p .m. to 7 : 00 a .m . (c) Excessive vibration , as determined by the Director of Development Services , shall be resducte to acceptable levele . 26 . rri Ar : The City bet, iaakea finding (a.) . w (a) As raguired ' by the South Coast Air Quality iax at District , Project oil handlingand storage :11 Aso a vapor recovery system which will reduce `'�+• 95-98% of hydrocarbon emissions . - (b) The PxoJect will re lace 16 existing tanks which are un�caatsoll�ed for air pollutant ssaissions , including hydxocarbamo . The re lacment of the 16 tanks will reduce totiil estimAted emissions by 24 , 357 pounds per year . The r 7 new - Project Lanks with vappor recovery, assuming 95% effi•cier:cy, will. Separate 3 , 159 pounds of emissions per year . The total emission reduction -will be 219196 pounds or year , 58 . 1 pounds per day , or are 67% reduction its ydtocarbor emissions . This is the substantial not benefit of the project . W lr"urther hydrocarbon emission reductions also will bt achieved through the elimination of other an:tii uated piroceso oquipaien,t , including o 'D sump.� , oil--w4kter s.df .orators and other similar equ pment which is cr�rrept-1 qm a U611Wd 'for air pollutants . (d) The immediate neighborhood surrounding the Project pits Wil-L be -exposed to 31159 pounds par year of emissions, or approximately 9 pounds per day , The aeighbot000d currently is exposed to twice this amount because of existing tank batteries located nearby. g ,e.e ,MIAUAl Effect : Oil and asproduction g a4tivities Cam'' • alt benx*ne, a ]mown carcinogenic air 2dingR The City hereby makes finding (1) . rAL -�- Rg=t of �`i�n r :ets (a) An evaluation of the beamene emissions which may be associated with the Pr*oJect was conducted using the South CoAst Air Quality Una oment District proporred Rules 223 (Air, Quality Impact An& &see) and 1401 (Now Source , keview of Knows and Suepected Carcinogenic Air i Contami cunt e) . The 11roy ect f s potential benzene emissions , casing a conservative figure, will be . 00057 cubic motets or second , which. is 8 to 10 timer below the relsase 1nito that :squire further air quality analysis . 25 . i F r y ,ar yrr s. (a) No nor* than une lane of traffic. shall be closed 4usir4 the day and no lanss shall be closed at night , (b) BuxY intersections shall be eitber bored or dated over so that trafVc Interrupt ions will be kept to a minima. (c) Several hundred feet of pipeline will be r installed surveyed inspected and the trench back-filled ,fin o 4&y . 1'here osei no one area will be affected throughout the period of construction. 2. 18. 1 Zgl=tial Zflect : Temporar dust imracts win result from Projcict construction activities , inclining the construction of the water pipeline . �Zindi : The City herebymakes finding (1) The following meaeurea w ll miti.gata the identified impact to a 1e1rel of f as i Hall'i ce. i g (a►) A dust control program shall be submitted to the De airtment of , Development Servlcev for review rind approval prfor to -the irrsuance of �►uilding permits . (b) Uposed dirt areas shall be minimized in than project denign. hoade and parkingg areas shall be paved & ad other open *rate• shall be landscaped or covered (with gravel or asanalt ) to minimize dust generation. 2 .g.2 Zgt ant iA ftc:L: Pol lutasnt s will be emi tttedc by constructiou equipment and by vehicle trips . " ' ;ice,: The City hereby makes finding (1) . 1 (a1 xi - ,the c(MotSuction haset only 17 two-may .:, triF.s will bA sener0ed by the Troject . Thirty-two j e, is► .waY. r di b+ crraerated durie► the drilling pha�rei a . 7 fa , ,�� n +�ctia�a/pri�ct phhbo,: be W1e'riahs t am + hie n bar 0 trips iN1 sot , signi 'ita t . f Niffla t�k: oil roduction facilitiesa►ttitulay tanks o can be the source of fugitive ydrocax emissions . " 24 . . i a V YJ i (b) Secause the Project vill pare and add curbs to i currently unfinished streets , approximately 1 , 700 feet of additional curbside on-street parkLng will be made available to aret residents by the Project . A' (c) During the Construction phase , all, truck traffic shall be limitod. to streets reviewed by the City staff and Chosen to reduce impacts on the adjacent local zaWdi bothood . Bntraaces to the site shall occur only on Spt #afield Avenue and California Street and Delaware street, (d) Ttuck traffic shall be limited to the hours of 7 :OC a.m, and 5 : 00 p.m. (s) Truck deliveries shall be ataggered so that no trucks shall wait on the street for longer than five minuteri . No trucks shall be permitted to park on the streets . . (f) Local ,streets affected by truck traffic shall be inspected before and afte;b construction . Any damage to local streets by heavy trucks ahall be repaired and reconstructed per City requirements at the expense of the Project applicant , (g) Additional Project-related traffic will be of short duration and will involve lost traffic than. a normal conetruction project . (h) buying the production/infection phases there will be no increatie in traffic in the Project neighborhood resulting fross the Project . 1 . 7 . 3 I��-ent : The winter pipeline from the Chevron site will diardpt traffic over a short period along the following route:' from Golden West Street east h. along Clay Avenue to 8untin ton Street, then south along NuatInSton Street from C1a Avenue to the fact litV site at j Sp*i ag i eld � Avenue and RUZZi ngton Street. The City hereby makes finding (i) . J 'Jhe following seatures,will mitigate theIdentified' Impact to a level of insignificance. I 23 . y r-: :. 4a ea � •� •1i•/4"�" �f• Y 'Ti'1��' TTTIIIIT��9 i-j The City hereby w4kee finding (1) . �' to in _.S]ippar.t,,..gt IF A j ryw: This following Owasures will mitigate the identified impact to a level of insignificance . (a) Puring the drilling phavej all heavy truck Oaffie *hall be limited to the 1011owi streets between `the 405 Presway nod. the Project •irts: each Boulevard , Also Avenue , and lmleaaa�r.e street . Utraftes to the site OWL occur only on Springfield Avenue and California Street . ',Paese truck routes and teceeses were reviewed by .City, •staff and • we re chosen to reduce impacts on the adjacent local neighborb od . (b) Truck tragic shall be limited to the hours of 7 : 00 a .m. and 5 : 00 p .n. (c) Bruck deliveries shall be stagSeeod so that no trucks shall wait on the street for longer than five ziftutae . No trucks shall be Permitted to park on the (d) local streets affected by truck traffic shall �e inspected before and after construction .My damage to lodal streets by heavy truck.11 shall be *paired and reconstructed per City requiKenents at ths , wTenss of the Proje+tt applicant , (e) It will not be necessary to restsAct parking on � the side streets to accommodate tracks . Trucks with a ` turning t&diue of 55 feet can easily tuna from 6pringffield alv ue gato Catiformia Street . Curbs will be minted red to prohibit parking for 10 feet olk either site of" the f An 'overload ;-permit shall be obtained liras the City and State (it refsvi red ) for all oversi,aed goads to be mowed on public ,stre►stt . tM ' 1ILA During the 47-illing. and 40"trnct e. traffic will, fndiease 6041nally in 'tom' Project YAeinity. The City hereby mates finding (1) , The following measures will mitihats the identif ie impacts to a level . of Ar�significa�act. (a) All employees shall park on-Mite. 22 . 4 Jh •I' *• r I^J) F , 1, 1 A oil-producing uses . Currently some residents@ are within 20 feet of existing wells that will bo abandoned uncle- the t: proposed Project . For example . on the Villa St . Croix site, 5 a e�•ating wells arc located within 20 feet or . less of condominium units . In total , 'therefore. Project will irodmee land use impacts from oil-producing uses . M The IPacts in Support of Findings 1 . 1 , 2 . 5 . 1 . 1 20 , 2 .6 and 2 . 9 hereby are incorporated by reference. li a, * sweption of a6sthetic impacts , discussed in Action 1 . 11 mitigation measures and elements of the Protect wbich will reduce impacts on the environmsat will also snouts Project compatibility with surrounding uses (c) Use Permit 88 .25 includes conditions intended to snouts that the Project is consistent with the surtc -.hding residential area . 2. 6 . 1 J?Qt&At...I act; The drilling phase of the Project will be in operation 24 bouts a da��rr. Lighting for safes vill be required at night . Some blighting will be visible to adjacent re idsl ut■ and pasvers�by. Ziwiiags : The City hereby makes finding (1) . The f ollowi i 4111 , M#surW � )J mitigate the Identified impact to t level insignificance. Ca) Light and glare shall is directed or screened to prove lit I� dr�ect glare from Project lighting outside it -. pi�rssseta� bou�adarles . fib)., ,.So Mood lights shall. be used. Li bts will be 1,0 ' �t0h ip, :a. , will light low valve and l equipment areal only) . }.,. . 4) fttiva drilling, the derrick will be enclosed and is , ept the aircraft wstning li ht, will be oar th! i de of the atoustic�il blmket . Lo is around the ausilliary tqvipsont., Brill be near ground level and well below tha top o the 39' acoustical sr, 11. . 2 . 711 Luring the drilling ' phase of the Project , 3 heavy vehicle (truck) trips a day will be gevera4sd by the Project . 21 , ill ,. r �44:� � 'T '�, +.,',� III 1. • *l Fiirnre 4-1 rr and Land IIfl�maet .MAtrim"` rr-01rr zoning it shown on the matrix to be compatible with Medium Density Residential . The Project Site tiriii have 11-0114 zoning . The surrounding p*idhborbood is designated Medium Density Rt ydential . rerstore o the Project is consistent with the ,rand Use , SloiwWto as shorn by the Matrix. 19A finding of consistency "y onlybe made ekr analysis of the proposed sowing its terms oi ell nine elements of the general Plan . A finding of consistency with only one of the, elements , such as the Land Use Xlewent, is not sufficient for a finding of consistency nit. ► the General plan. Ihlt�r considering all nine e:kemeats , a f indict of consistency with the Ganera►l plan say be made for the zoning proposal in question if it can be shown to further or possess a measure or significant degree of compatibility with the General Plan policies and Rz. F Tbif ahalys 1$ has e►X&Sindd all elements at the :ensral Plgn din . a policy-byCeral li;cy basis . The PrbJect will further a number of Plan policies and prograns , and is consistent with the terrain er . Therefore, it is consistent with the General Plan. With ro#p9ct to the Land Use Element , the policies have been translated into a Zoning and Land Ves . Rzement Consistency Matrix which is included ss Pigure N. The Matrix •shows that as a miscellaneous district -01 may be combiik Ci .e is consistent ) with any land use catesbr+` .. Yt If specifically consistent +pith : 1w, medium 1 and tiod ft-hi'gh density, residential categories. 2. 5 . 3 'l Urflw The Project I will be located in a reed min residential area , which could have advers I" use iM+pacts on surrounding residences. • The City hereby s finding (1) with . sapmct to , all, load -use impacts exceptthose specifically ` 4oh04344 Section 1 . (4) The Project will result in the abandonment of 22 scattered **Ill over a 160-acts area . It will also remove I assccittsd tank batteries . Therefore, the Project will reduce the number of residences which remain adj-acent to 20 . The project will remove oil producing facilities from 6 sites scattered over a 160-acre area and consolidate them on a 3. 1 acre site. This will reduce the area used for oil facilities . The abandonment of existing wells will eliminate potentially incompatible land uses from rsesidential areas . Althcugh oil producing facilities will ran on the Project site, the Project site will be .,, i th,014 over its present condition to reduce or eliminate po ntial land use conflicts with tke surrounding ffittghbothood . As conditioned and mitigated, the Pro ect , F will not gop&tdixe thi public health, safety, an welfare . *S- efowe, the Project is consistent with this policy. section 3.ia . 6- 2(.d)� "Utilize the oil suffixes to +�iure that cob+stal dependent enemy extraction is accommodated in '`areas designed other than resource production, estcept ;:or environmentally sensitive habitat areas . i • The change of some for the ProjOc'� will utilise an oil suffix to ensure that energy extraction is accomodated in as area not specifically designated "resource production." The Pro ect is not located in as environsentally sensitive habitat area. Tharefore, the Paojett is consistent with this tolicy. [cousidet] 'enhanced , oil ret'ovury activity and . . . ensure the evaluation of is acts 'different from those associated with conventional extraction. " This EIR discussed potential impacts of secondary water techniques which are different from those associated with conventional extraction (see , e.g. , discussions of subsidence and injection water) . Therefore , the Project is eoaeistent with this policyll j Section . _,, "Promote compatibility of oil and other inargy- related activities with surrounding uses to the -wmiwam extent feasible, " A. . : . iacl.ude Measures such as additional requirements regarding fencing, platting and la udscapin% to ensurs aeirthatic and environmental compatibility *tweet oil activities oud other uses. The Project will tc��aply with Chapter 15.22 of the ,City Oil Code (Screening and Landecatpping�► . T'her.elore, the Project is consistent with this policy. 19 . ------- .-- - lo C { 4MM + tie 1 uses , Therefore , the Project is consistent with this policy . 1011iminating conflicts between existing ndustrial uses and non-compatible uses . " The Project will remove oil producing facilities from 6 tq&,t. therqby eliminating potential Incompatible lend • �tkas tesid6ati:al areas . Although oil fac"llittse will resin on the Project site , tjtoducin6 o Project site will be improved over its ' present condition to reduce of eliminate potential land use conflicts with the s4 , ounding neighborhood , overall , the project will VedUce the potential for land use coaflicts from oil developoauto in residential areas . Therefore, the project is consistent with this policy . 11' "Coordinate the instarllatiou of can ty facilities with street improvements where he Proj tct will provide concrete curbs and getters in `. conauactiyon. with the construction of gale streets. herelore , the Project in conmistent Vi'A.a this policy , � aatai �itstc!nt Altb,,V h. this element addresses coastal policies, the following policies relating to energy resources could be applied to developments throughout the City.- , t ? 'I courage the production of energy regoutcsm , a0 Officientl,y as passible with minimal adverse The troject, will use secondary recovery techniques to incre"G, ,the, elticierAcy of oil productton. As crmditioned end 43tfgdted, the rinject fps adverse eftWI will be sainioal Therefore; the PrOject is consistent with this i PO der t., "Incourage unitiaxtiou and 6� at on of ez piing oil 1peratiorns . . . to the .maximum extinit • feasible and legally p*9missibl* . when such activities (1) reduce the area used for oil facilities , (2) are .not mort environmentally disruptive than existing,, arrangemornts and (3) do not jeopardise public health , safety or welfare . " 18 . :r � •fir':"4 f, t I y,I 4, �n W IAVA USA i' "To provide for the proper de 10 sent , Mainten@nce, improvement , preservation, and vas o? the City's natural resource@ by rwmoving and restoring oil production areas as wells become "w.-product i ve . The approval of the Project will permit the abandonment • ash removal of 22 we lA . Therefore , the Project is +consistont with tbia policy. Seat �� 11T,;. provide and maintain a quality living envi ronawat so that menbets of all economics social, and ethnic groups may reside in Huntington Peach by providing an adaquate level of comausity services , t facilities , improvemente , and maintenance in all areas of the city. " As conditioned and mitigated , the Project will increase ,the quality of areas surrounding wells to be abandoned , because the appearance of the well sites will be improved and they could be developed for residential: uses . Theriefore, the Project is consistent with this policy. IM A&&A&ft ...3-A. 2. e:. "To seek out and encourage i.n dv@trial development that will broaden the city '■ econoiAie base, s" that is diversified , that is well related to other land uses, and that provides local Jolb opportunities by : " 3.a. 2. 9.�J "Locating industrial uses adjacent to compatible land uses .'' 1be Project will resrove oil producing facilities !roar 6 ,• s�itai s 'thereby .. eliminating potentially incorpatihie Und uses fro® residential arias . Although six producing facilities will swain on the Project sits, the - rroject sto will., be improved over its present condition toreduc e o 01tainato potential land use conflicts with the sutrtu- dins neigbbothood , Overall the Projact will *ewe *he , prrten�W for land ur+e incompatibilities from oil devo' lopments in residential areas . Thet ef+ote, it is tonaletout tritb this policy. let f., 113stabl i shinq effective environmental �,. t h e t t mnib isa the ttterfal effects 4n other land unto; sod the eravi roment . The conditions and mitigation measures imposed on the Project will minimise its ' external affects on other land i 1 , •f•, f!tti'- , ' deft "Goal : To provide a multi-mode ttansportation stem that ensure$ the safe and efficient movement of people and goods . " s . ' The ., Project will not Cause or result in significant #t**tic increases . It %411 only requite three truck tripe d which is too lour in volume to create a I R oat elver imot t4 saxaty. it� eloru, the p'r Oct si convistlst with this policy. • 1i;0 2.5 "Policy : provide adeqquatb truck and ra �arvU0 to induotxial and commerical areas while 1 prowvidin* ■iniam disturbance to residenti&1 areas . Project . truck routes have been planned to minimize distupti.on to surrounding residential areas . Therefore , tht riajoct is consistent with this policy. M Seanic 110 licies in the Scenic Highways Rlerremt apply to the 1rto, ct . KPINIng "Action: monitor changes In WOO AS1 fad commercial land uses to asrses their , impact on residential land use .,, Tht lilt discustion. of growth--indu�.inx,, : impacts describes the attect that the Ptojef:t will have on residential ,, . . Rs tell as the Impact on further residential .. if th Project i• not a ,p�raved . Preto R 6• ,Iraijew' of the project crapfriee with ithie policy. i S . , ;. `++Act iota: Review all c ea In d and wee, to determine the emulativeImpacts on 1 ity tacil;�tiert . + lh discuesioa of cubulative impacte describes the f . !A. ��0 c i give impacts on community fokeil it ies . { ity's ' reviev of the FrOjUt I COMP1 48 Frith 'cy , "Action: Continue to actively ifif6ve-4 land use ordinances. 94 Tho ' pfa3e6t will be subject to all City land .use ordigmcee and reSulatione , enforced through *onditiona attached to the CUP. Therefore. the Project is consistent with this policy, 16 . i Sr v r y project structures will be designed to withstand predicted robttle ground motion accelerations . Therefore, the rojatt is consistent with this policy , (c) Nolan n . "Goal : To reduce to acceptable levels f#e of noise amg osure from all transportation, stationary and other »v►i sance sources in the comer ity to 6t' insure the public health , safety, and welfaTe. 11 �. Zj. "Objective : To minimize external :,. noise and prevent then from penetrating existing quieter areas . o S#gtign .2 . 3 ,13 -,LAU "Policy: The use of quieter auto-- >' mobiles , machinery and equipment should be encouraged . " f . 3 .2•,, nytinalp Noisy!_,t ev#1e : "The optimum noise level for all residential uses in LDN 60 for outdoors (a f6simateYy, equivalent to Cam, 60) and Ldn 45 for in ooxs . r`y The project will be conditioned , through the CUP, to exceed the requirements of the Cityy noise code . er�Thfores the Project is consistent W th these policies . $sttfnn .1. 3 . 4 . 14, Noina ,. . 2IAA- noise ftning • "Ccnoider reetrictinj zew r0ldestial development within 25 feet of an ele�ttic 00tor=driven pu,ap, 11 Altbou h this s-iction in not directly V 'plicable to the. tlr+# #c 'w it isrplies that a 2S-Moot b should esivt f b#t"Oft pnaps and residential areas . ' Th'I Uumps on the 40t' di#e ,will be in excess of 100 f#et it= the r,•, , .OJeVest7 r6tident i al unit . Thor of ors , the Project is tote l etent with this got i cy. gif"igure l shows the' eaistiat and proposed s WU 'at ultimate development . 1' The Vkoject will not adversely affect or preclude the development of any recreation facility shown in figure 2-13 Therefore, It is consistent with figure 2-13 . �S . 43 scattered over 160 acres . Although oil roducing facilities will remain on the Project site , t o appearance of the Project site will be improved over its present coMAition. Therefore, the Project is consistent witb this policy. WAR S24ce "Oil Production AW1�ine � t� ' rd rims td► Airens , �� defined as valuable assets (not of lose a ! cute w ch abould be incorporated into a c rehensivo Open Space and Conservation Program. The Project site is not included in any adopted Open Space ox Conservatien Protran. i Fhprs 2.2 . ++ RoLre-M GgMsex3liktion Zriax1t t„1Ar,2&e:i. i1xiueral Resources" are listed as a "Second Priority JW0449 " accompanied by a policy to "encourage utilization of oineyral vealth ; prevent blight, pollution, and undue destruction of natural features . The Project will use secondary recovery techniques to increase the efticiency of ail production. As conditioned and mitigated , tke Project will not add to blight or pollution. hex*load , the Project Le consistent with this is � �l Y • At- glen lid► encompasses all rts stt and lanced open space and oasetva ion rograns as w i as several additional pra�ects , �� ( nMral Plaii at p. 16. ) i o eu space I dovelop"nts , open space p4as areas , or Po axa corridors arm dgi nate+d on the Project Site or vi hia the oubsvrince 'To ect Area. The McCallen Park site% the nearest identif led site, is two blocks to the born of the roam• Itiongs Used r.. U V' Q Project site is in gone C, 11 alie'1 rloadfng . #, thesrefore, the Project is, not in a flood buzzard area . r "Continue to require geologic invoot gatLone of all significant development projects and to stipulate by Conditions of Approval that all construction within those projects be desigue$ to withstand predicted probable ground motion accelerations - 1 U v� is 2 . 5 IAM ,, ZOE59 No PLAN i aS, The Project site currently is x;no "Old Town Specific Plan" (District 1) , combined with QiX production (0) . The "a" Oil District prohibits d i . th otier to illyent the Project 0 a Bone IMM 1001, to "Oil, oil tretrict is required * ZJMAJmX&: The Ci �-y hereby snakes finding, (1) . ractm in SsInvart of W t: (a) Section 9682 of Article 968 of the Cit s ?honing Code provider for the establishment of 110111 Dretrricts . The p oq.y limitation for such an 01 District is that of a minims surface area (100 feet by 150 feet , as required b section 9682 . 1. The proposed drill site for the Ptoject is considerably larger than the minimum dimensions required by section 9682 . 1 . Therefors , it is consistent with this provision. fib) Section 9662 . 2 requires dedication, or an irr6veable offer of dedica►tiont of all resrl raperty that t it City say ,require for its streets and otter public service facilities or improvements . All City-required dedications will be im0lemented through the terms of recorded tract maps for the Project write . Therefore , the project ix consistent with this provision, 2. 501 The project zoning ,rust be consistent with the Huntindtom Beach General Plan. According to the Gtnstal Plan, "conatstertcy between the x9 oaal d the neral Plan would he determited .-••t ill the itcies and programs of each 0 t t•;,' the 0600,V 1 D am d their rol4tionship to the The City hereby makee finding (1) 4 The following policies of the General Plan ripply to the Project , The Project is consistent with these Polities for the rea4ois stated bolters. 'arc �an ,?• L2.1-3 : 'Incoulra inq beautification of oil pproducing are—ex and restoration of non-productive oil The Project vill remove oil producing, facilities from 6 v ites , thereby permitting the restoration of oil sites 13 . •^ ^ ; r� �S F « !NA xs ' • (c) Fact (a) in Support of Finding 2 . 2.39 relating to 0 VoLity of groundwater In the area, hereby is COSpotatAd by reference . 2. 2 A At -Ur3a: Ue development of re. t.yV r'ti of the projoct site r ill d4stroy , speor on the Project Site . ri hgh: The City hereby makso finding (1) . 061414 Dank of MAIRB: The' Project site is cutrenay disrupted, 'talluini , . piles of dltt from earlier construction activiti . so cultivated or native species exist on the site, *=Opt for weedy plants . �adecapi will itsplace � all vegetation lost dnxinf, grading and add additional • �►e��tatpa �b so ;are or endangered s eci►es are knows or "994ted to b�e qA the Project site. 2 e. 1 fqf- Tee gradinjj of the ?project site AMMAVAtion fpx foundations &ua well collars will dI tp* iieoversd arahasologiol and paYeaaatoit��cM� res�urae: . lJnA1ggjt : The City hereby aahes finding (1) . i iijj it is' little likelitioOd of undiscomed t 'q tar - 64 the Project Site. The majority 6f the known iO01 sitar in the City site locateed 4ong the ' ,Oe bait of the ftata' Ma acid Sae G br i el *Z .fehaeolo Leal siteo neorest ' bo ftoject "toly 0.6 and I mile my�, f rea the Sri Nadi and extavation, earth nigvin crags i is d spoils tot V t�ential armoological . a tbb *"at of A Itential Find bei n& located ,, f 69LA E"�:�tll be •aspen ed until the- Opif �cance of is datetaine►d The- ba co►n4itioned thrOugb the IIsi Permit to follow specified procedures its the event that ytwain& are located . 12 . i 14 �•M,,,. 1, . h Potsbls water tAs been szt racted from acquifere in the gratis ton Beach area although usually only in ax%4a aast at the Vswpart-I lewood Taut . ?be Project Site is rase of , the fituli and log in fact , located between two braftehes of the fault. The Wection of water and extractiod of l in the oil-bearing strata will sot have a significant '' • foes on the quality of groundwater because 06 water trest"44y is not usable foe oltbsr dmeat.ic of Industrial 'Y' uM�N • (b) State Division of Gib. and Gas Regulations require that the base of all fresh water sands that are penetrated be protected f roma' salt water invasion lros# 'below by cemating . The pi'vision of Oil and Gas W11.1 require that water test be performed to assure proper seals Were fors#d . The Use Parait requires that pipe string cssanting through fresh water-beating rands shall be impitaented to prevent saltwater I"utrusion into the '�-� acquirers . (c ) During dri.11ing operations , tbt drilling fluid which is Circulated in the voll board ` to remove cuttiagr farms a membrane around the bore hole wall and inhibits water infiltration into the formilti,ons which have been enstratod . The area of water infiltration from the ; rilling mud is usually no gore than a few feet in d i"et e r . Z , 1. 4 Potential Meet : „ Make-up Water will be transported to the Project Zito through a pipeline . If thm pi.pelizet ruptured , brine could be released . Z ,: The City hereby rihes finding (1) . JaC.ts in SUggar. t, o 2be tollovia atararss Will mitigate the ideatip ed impact to a levee of isritii'�►i.S�caa►ce. (a) The see-up- water pi eliiie . will be buried spproxirrattly -So irwhe l below-the- 'attest surfAce ssas�ura l rc than top of the ,pipe. t'he pipei:�er is *bow ��i�e groundwater surface "d will ant oaatounter any aufface water . (b)' ez pi�peline will be sanitored with automatic shutdoyn pressure sensore au tbat. aay sudden preaeure drop will trigger an alarm and #but down the tr&asf er piu%pa . This will inputs that any release of water is minimal , 11 . 1 �r clArAllfiere for this emergency use . 2 . 212 fttgntIAJ f.p.%Rt: The original ETR. stated that prodLeed water or mak-e•'•up water would be released to the sanitary sewer system. This is no longer the case . Injection water will riot release to the sanit-Aru sewer evetem. Fi.ndjA g: The City hereby makes finding (1 ) . Fats in Supa 2Lt SAX ]E1ndin1te_: (a) All water used for injection into the underground oil reservoirs will be obtained from the following sources : stoma water runoff ; pr:sduceu Water from the roduction wells ; and make-u b:etne water (water to nitially fill the underground re nervcirs) purchased fr.ow Chen --on U. S .A . At present Chevron 'U , S .A . is treating and releasing the make--up brine water into the sanitary sewer system. Use of the, brine hater for Injection purposes will ir~itial.ly reduce the existin load on the Aanitary sewer system by approzimately 30 , 010 barrels per daffy. Cb) All brine ,produced with the oil will normally be cleaned by circulation through sand filters and settling tavdKe and will then be reinjected into the formations , (r.) In the event of a Complete electrical failure , all prcductlon wells will go down, and there will be no produced water , The flow of make-up water will be stopped at, the source . The water filtration system will include rosevre capacity to allows for continued operation during equipment maiotenance or repair . if a longer time period In needed to make repairs or to replace eqquipment , make-up water will be reduced and/or .• ! partial. shutdown of high water--cut production wells will be implemented . 2 . 2 . 3 1018nU5 1 Effect. Tare drilling of the wells .for the project will involvo penetrating both shallow and deep Mtvndwater acqquifers to gain access to oil--boating layers ora., r.orulti09 in potential adverse effects mi 'groundwater . rindi1lg8: The City hereby makes finding (1) LJkQ9 of Find LQS: The f0 won measures will n ti*ate the identified impact to 4. . 10*2 of ierxg�i�'icance . � (a) The. water- found in the M411ow. aM deep g,remAdvitet acgvifere lot for the .most part. brack sb. : 1C; I a�. i i fields . No c. ;.:hq'uakes have been locatfia in either field or in nearby i. elds , that would indicate oil operations to be a causative lactur . 2 . 2 RQLOGY. I?l'.kMO►Z-ANDA R QU ►Lln 2 . 2 . 1 f�2±&atjAl_.,f'gj;.t-: Storm water runoff will be increased because the exialZing permeable land surface will be decreased by approximately three atcree of lend resultinZ from the paving of the: Project Site with asphalt . If_ndJ=: The City herebf makes finding (1) . is in 5uoD_Q1t. _of Fi111iUU: (a) The iriwreaee in atorm water from paving the Protect Site will not have negative impacte on the existin storm drain system because the Project has been denig. t1 to utilize all on-site storm water runoff for water injection purpopes . j (b) The con©truction of new half--section streets with concrete curb and gutter will alleviate the present water ponding problems along the City right-of-way. (c) Surface drainage , including storm water , on the Drill Site ?hall be diverted to catch basius , then by � gravity flow aria underground pipeline &crone the street to the facility Site . The water will be collected in #arid i.ntetcepfor So . 1 and then pumped into the water xocersing area, iAltered and mixed with the production at ine and injected into the oil bearing zone as part of the water flood . The interior of the Yacility Site will be partially paved with asphalt a4er a rock bans and the remAining portions will, be paved . With crushed rock. The ma ' rity of storm water W surface drainage will i il.tratte into the Moil through the Crushed rock, Any remains atorn water,; and surface drainage will bel collaat in catch basins , diverted to the ' @toad Latrocalp6ts and then follow the same process as water frvm tine Drill Site . (d) In the 'evert of a power failurrt during a 100-year ato=6 . an emergency valve could be opened on the !'acility bite amd all storm water could be directed via gravity flaw pi eland to well Colla-to A and h. When the cellars air* rtiall fi111ad, wetter will flow to a , thane- stage dJA;JfJq9 t 6.\, if ntrcnrssary, Via, ipeling to the County ' #ia dtAls in �-,0elaware Street . Cedars A and h have beets 8 cff'ItAlly sagineeted to perform as additional 9. is '�T. ._,•.. �ul { i. 'i.i. _ n.1 .__ . � .. _ facts. in EuPpgrt Find inns (a) Several reports indicate that the rate of r subsidence has decreased since water flooding of oil producing zones was initiated in 1959 . The Division of Oil and Gas (1973 ) re orta than the maximum recorded rate of vubsidence w&v 0 . 15 feet per year from 1955 to 196e but decreased to 0 . 05 feet arer year from IV)$ to 1,472 . I� (b) bxperience in other oil fields , siir.h as wilmin ton, snows than: repreosurization of t:'i:ir, oil psoductng zones through waver injection has caused reduced rataQ of subsidence and oftan has completely :salted subsidence and even caused from rebound . (c) Based on the wcudier by the Division of Oil and Gas and experience in. Wilmington, cited above , the implementation of the project will not increaee subsidence , and should reduce the rate of eubeidence , in the Project Area . 2 . 1 . 3 'Patentir ,,X. In three cases , oil field operations or other fluid in je,-tion activities have been 4o,cuaented as teleting to induced seismic movements . In the WilmiA ton Field, California , several small , subsidence- induced earthquakes occurred . In the U. S Rocky Mountain Arsenal , Colorado , a series of earthquakes etas caused by fluid emplacement In a liquid waste . disposal pr.^Ject . In an oil reservoir at Rangely Field , Colorado , aster injection operations resulted in induced oeismie I.aoveme nt s . ending!!: The City hereby makes finding (1) . ha) Pone of he above e i tuat i ons it likely to occur at t e proposed site . The Project is a water injection groJaCt , which will riot cause subsidence . The facts in port 'of Finding 2 . 1 .2 hereby are incorporated by reforence . (b) The Rocky Mountain Arsenal . and -4ngsly eatrtlr2n#kf98 It' Colorado occurred in hard brittle rock. This rock is 2*00gically different from the young sedismAts of tbs 14s Angeles basin. (0 ' Mitro-eartLgnake MODitOring systme t designed to a+ccurotely ,locate small , •harrow . *Artbqu*kes tbat..night be farot+sd by oil operations , have been in operation about t 'ys tg ' in tho vicinity of Inglewood and Wilmington oil 8. Drill Site will be graded and recompacted to Aubstontiall,y follow th(: contours of the abutting etreetil , Ur-avation, to a U.s th of %sproximately 12 feet willbe required t� permit construction of tnrea smbsurfac4 well 44110F9 , The topography of the racility Site will be lowered approximately twa feet balnw the $treat elevation~ on the south and west And six feet below the street ti$vatidnp pn the nurtheast corner , in order to reduce the ;eight of thQ storage tanks . r ,i�glga : The City hereby ekes finding (1 ) FIIG `.l Its�r. 'i nd i nt s (a) The project Site currently consists of two parcels , which acre vacant except f Qr eXistiog oil troduction facilities and well Funn . The vacant areas of he parcels are coverer: w1th itr pile$ from Prior conetructicn activity . Because the existing tops rephy of the project Site is disturbed and covered with► piles of dirt , the effects of grading are not s'igalf icant , (t) The surface can be restored at the end of the ProJect ' ■ life span. Prior to t+$rmination of the oil operation, a plan shall be submitted for tbq rtiview and approval of the Fire Department and Develops ant Vervi oee Department , showing how the Sito will be aboadoned and restored to its closest natural OtAts . (c) All loose upper AoiXe within the f oundatign Areas for process equipment on the Facility Site $gourd be removed and replaced as compacted 9111 . Irgundation areas for the well cellars on t'Ae Drill Sites sha.11 bo overexcavated a minimum of two foot vertioa,lly and ;three feet horizontally and replaced by corn acted fill . Superficial tills near the cellar$ shoulf be removed and teploced at compacted fill . 2 . 1 . 2 Ptom ect ; Land surfaos 4011deno9 has occurred in the Runtingt;n Beach area , with B MOAT subsidence area roughly correlatin6 with the knits of the Runt i ngton Beach Oil Field . ACcord ind to the laRt leivellat -survey for the Runtinstoo 1e00 ]hot station located near the Intersection of Adows Avenue and $olech Boulevard , the eubsidence in the ftojeet Arta #i w4 , l to -.0 .2 foot for the period from 1976 through 1986. The current av+erasie rate of subsideaee pax You is ap1proximately -0 . 02 feet . FIndia&: The City haroby s eo findi (1) • r - 1 (a ) The Project engineering will prevent the well cellars from being damaged , even in an M 8 earthquake . (b) Oil will be shipped on a continuous basis , eo that all of the tanks in the oil storage area will never be full at the same time . Only three on-trite Crude oil tanks are permitted and these tanks shall never be completely full at once . The oil storage area is located a ix feet below grader , and the area is surrounded by reinforced ::ancrete retaining walls . The volume of this depressed :etaining basin exceeds the Uniform Fire Crde , and Division of Oi). and Gas requirements , by a factor of 2 . Even if the retaining wall is ruptured , the retaining area would hold oil released by tacks which burst or Qvartuirn . (c) The Facility would shut dourn under a "tail--safe" sysitelt - as soon ao the page*. Went off during a major earthquake . No emergency situot-ions would be created requiring immediate attention by, or an augmentation of , public safety personnel . (d) Engineering soils analysis and fault line investigations were performed to determine it near •urfsce faulting is present within the Drill Facility Site Areas . The resultant study concluded that no faultu or related fracture zones were observed in the trench expowures . Accordingly, an active fault lira is not kaaFnl to be fresent within the trench limits . The fault line uvestigation report show that no faults were found . (e) Although the above measures would prevent the creation of an emergency situation during an earthquake of M g or greater , no known engineering or other mitigation measures could avoid damage to she Facility if such a major earthquake occurred . In co,.Junction with dawtage that would occur to the surrounding area, this is a sitnifiomn} unavoidable iapact of the Project . 1 . mm== AL XUJJ&QMZHJ6J_4 P OR W910. -GM. AS =T1 JA=TO-A. LML OF Ywermwt��_ wr_e fto City has determined that the following effe..ts will not be significant , for the reasons stated below. . 1 . 1Ubot t Development of the Project will alter the existing tapngrephy of the DvAll Site and S'aoility sit*. The Meting outface of the ground on the g . -._ .. 1 .r.r. very aiCnificantly reduce any 11% adia•nt heat hanard footprint , " which is calculated using n, Containment whatevtr . (b) Oil will be shipped on a continuous basis . Therefore , only a minimal amount of oil will be required to he held in the tanks , Only three on-site crude oil tanks are permitted , and these tanks Phall never be comioletely full at once . ( e) Prior to the issuance of buildin permit , a preliminary emergency action plan (W) ehal1 be prepared and submitted . A cope leted .RAP , based on at-built plane , shall, be completed anc! submitted prior to the start of oil production operations . The ZAP shall include employee training and periodic practice , how spillage onto streets from Site would be handled , the safe handling of any chemical.e - nd/or materials , and full know'..edge of all wyatems and emergency equipment . A copy shall be on file at the ri re Department and updated ovary five years , In addition, a Spill Prevention and Control and Countermeasures (SPCC) plan in compliance with City requirements for handling of spills , etc . , not otherwise c6vered in the RAP shall, be completed and filed with the I City prior to the start of oil production operations . (d ) The Facts in Support of finding 2 , 11 . 2 , relating j to fire prevention/protection , hereby are incorporated by reference . (e) Although the likelihood of this impact occurring is extremely low , if it did occur , the impacts would be significant , Therefore, it is c,onaidered a wignif icant unavoidable impact . i . 3 SX-1 MIC IMPA T 1 . 3 . 1 SJZUUJ&ant UJs rt : If an earth u0s of N 9 . 0 or greater on the Richter Scale occurs with tits epicenter in the Project Area , structures in the Project. Area , inciudin& tsnhs and walls of the Project facilities , would be damaged . s The City hereby m►akea findings (1) and (3) . : The following measurer will rvoult a a substantial reduction of the a►dv*rse isopacts of the identified significant tffett . 3 . numb 1 (f ) The enclosure of both parcels of the Project Site will Provide the most direct witigatiGa of visual impacts . Surrounding thu drill site with an acoustical wall will provide a more aesthetic viewnhed . (g) During the initial drilling pharpca , when drill rigs are visible , the drill site sh&11 be surrounded by an a4oumticat wall and portions of the rig will be acoustically wrapped . (h) The Facts in Support of Finding 2 . 6 , addressing light and glare , hereby are incorporated by reference . (i ) The Project requires the drilling of 30 to 45 wells from the drill site . These wells shall be located within the fenced and laudscaped drill site and the wells sha??l be concealed from view. (j ) The topotra by of the Facility Site would be substantially lowered to reduce the height of the storage tar . (k) The,e mitigation measures included within the Iro,ject Design and imposed by the Use Permit will � •ubstantially ' reduce the aesthetic impacts of the Project . Nonetheless , the Project will result in a change in the views from adjacent residiincer , because of the additiclu of a 30-Moot round barrier wall and a 165-foot drilling derrick . This , is an unavoidable adverse impact of the Project . 1 . 2 ]SK OF UFSYalMIALTH MM-A&= 1 . 2 . 1 Sign. unt Effect : Under a worst case sconariol assuming that all oil tanks are full and the tanks are met out ' in an open field without surrounding perimeter walls , there is a "rare" (defined in the standard methodology for risk assessment as 1 : 10.d00 to 1 : 1 , 000 ,000 chance that au oil, tank lire could result in radiant neat effecting the area outride of the iw*diate Project Site 11gdJ 'a: The city hereby makes findings (1) and 1 0) . The followin► maruires will Teswlt 1A the vubstent l reduction of t1e aftorse iaspacts of the identified significant effect : (a) 011 haed1 ; tAtilititl will be lo�+rufed • to •ice i t 'b�r10 t 1tr�ir of the burrouadiu& struts . This tsmrs, coupled with the si t-foot perimeter wall , will r s;, 1 r I 1 F.T.,HDJH, .5 _,? ._, RDI r; 1 1 Z:[FX'CTs n& c&M� -70_LEVEL QZ Imo! MUCAUX., The City has determined that EIR mitigation wasures and proposals included am part of the Project will result in a substantial mitigation of the following effects , but that these effects cannot fe!aribly be mitigated to a level of insignificance . 1 , I Ax:=TICS 1 . 1 . 1 szaif.icut._�FAMR ;,.;. The neighborhood ourroundin the Project Slto3 Coneiets of medivm density residential uses , preedomimently in small (8-10 unit ) developments and single family residences . View of the Project Site from adjacent residences will consist of the screening block wall and landscaping . During the initial dri"lin# phases , drill rigs will be visible , luring the groduct ion acid( infection pbasees ; temporary drill r i s will o used periodically for maintenance and will '+fie vts i bl.e from adjacent residents . Tauko will be visible above the wall . rindicau. The City hereby makes tiodings (1 ) and C3) The f ollowing Measlites will result - in a substantial reeducti om of the I adverse impacts of the identified significant affect . (a) The Project shall caaply with the landscaping requirements of Chapter 15. 22 of the Huntington Eeach Ordinance Code . (b) All trees shall be a► minimum of 24-inch , box type * and spaced no more than 20 feet on center , (c) lAnd+ecaping sud the construction of masonry Walls and street improvements shall occur concurtent with excavation and construction. (d) Well service rigs shall be operated no mare than 48 days per year, and no more than 4 Well se twice rigs may teen on the site at any one: t xme . These service zags shall ntet eexeled Y2o fast in height . (e) Drilling derricks thrill mot u:Geed i45 feet An Wight . Upon completion cf initial drilling of injection and produces wells , all drilling rigs `hall be r- sMoveed !Aces the site. 1 . l 4 f indin� referred t�. Ends—, Thy Environmental Impact Report ("EIR��) fv r the oil recovery project ( "Project") propa3ed byy- Arggue petroleums Corporation ("FrLJect Applicant") identifies ! significant effects on the environment which may occur as ' a result of. the Project . 8@ctiori 1 of this Attachment identifies the significant eaviromental effects of the Project which cannot feasibly be mitiga:te(i to a► level of significance. @ctie,n __Z veto lortb potential environmental effects of the Project which are not significant because of the design of the Project or which c-in feasibly be mitigated to a level of insignificance . fiAct.ign -3 summarizes the alternatives discussed in the XIR. $RCti� consists of a Statement of Overriding Considerations which sets forth the City' s specific reasons for finding that the benefito of the projeCt outweigh its unavoidable envlromental effects . The findings s6t forth in each section are supforted , by findings of facto established in the adm nistrstive record of the Project . K Z 1 rr�r ORT r, CONSZDR ATIONE AY- XKWT_.IUM FDA_TIM AWBI5 PZTROLX= CO- -QE U O OIL 13MYWYLPROM ,.SCH NO, d60492 7 The State Guidelines ("Guidelines") promulgated puree,ant to the California Environmental Quality .Act ("CEQA") provide (a) No ublic agency shall ag rove car carry out a _ froject for which an EIR bar been completed vbicb dontifien one or more significant env3:y -aertal effects of the prc,ject unless the public a envy makes on3 or more oritten findings for each of those insignificant effects , accompanies by a brief explanation of the rationale for each finding . The possible findinge are : (1) Changes or alterations have been required in , or incorporated into , the project which � avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as identified in the final MR. [Th3 __JJnding stta .h� re eared +.a as (1) Such cbangges or nitrsrations are Within the responsibility and jurisdiction of anothe& jublic agency and not tho agency making the indi-',::a. Such Changer have been adopted by such other 04ency or can and should be adopteJ by such other agency. [This r nd in ;,s ha U bpi._rs a rred,,. t d ag "f indi" 11 A6,,] (S) Specific economic , socialt or other censidemious rake infeasible the mitigation seasures or project alteirnativee identified in the final ZZ R. (Guidelines r 2 . 14 Cumulati—re Im9auts 37 3 . Findings Regai:ding Alternatives 41 3 . 1 No Project Alters&rive 41 3 . 2 Reduced Intensity Alternative 42 3 . 3 More Intense Drilling Program 43 3 . 4 Abandonment of All Oil Production Situ 44 3 . 5 Alternative Sites : Frkrcel 1. 45 C 3 . 6 Parcel 1 Devel opvent Only 46 3 . 7 Alternative Sitev : Parcel 2 47 3 . 8 Alternati•re Sites : Parael, 3 48 3 . 9 Altvrnat i re Sites : Parcel. 4 49 3 . 14 Medium Density Residential Project 1 yM ' + r r 7' V r l h ,r• ��`^�.Li ��' :,b�� .. '�1, : _..•'i.d t�('�„.. .__ .n'�' ,. ._i 1,• . , . •___- 1 1 L7:,, ,1.,.'4..�u.��i� MY. GIL Cgs FCC - 1 USA RIMUT be SCE ICE 1b4UA0.11- 1 . riniNGS RzwDI n SIGNIFICANT ZMCTS TEAT 3 CANNOT PUSIHLF BE MITIQA119D TO A I. I. OF INSICMif`ICANcz 1 , 1 Aesthetics 3 1 , 2 Risk of Upo et/Realth and Saf cty 4 1 . 3 Seismic Inkpacte 5 2 . POTENTIP.T., M.IRONWZNTAL EFFECTS WHICE ARE 6 NOT SIGEIMANT 0.1 WHICH CAN BE MITIGATE? TO A J.y VEL OF INSMIFICAINCE J 2 . 1 Topography, Soils and Geology 6 2 . 2 Hydrology, Drainage and water Quality 9 2 . 3 Biological Resources 12 2 . 4 Archaeiogi cal/paleontological. Resources 12 2 . 5 Land Ova , Toning and General plan 13 2 . 6 Light and Glave 21 2 . 7 Traffic and Circulation 21 2 .8 Air Quality and Odors 24 2 . 9 Noise 26 2 , 1Q Risk of upset/Realth and Safety 29 2 .12 public Services av%1 Utilities 33 2 .12 Energy Gonse:. vation 36 2 .13 Grm th Inducing tapacts 3E r �r ATTACHMENT 4 FIRDINGS OF' FACT IN SUPPORT OF FINDINGS REGAnDING THE ENVXRON. WNTAL IMPACT REPORT F6R ANGUS OIL PETROLEUM CORPORATION �I Vl i 6, 4 I, •� aSsa+�Wl't':1�#,.'�T'!.'ala4_., ,',f'�it..i�iiY{��'...i' J • �J V�j�!� 'j , ` ,. r •• •' " , .WrWar.._..._„Y.,_.,. ...,.r4�r...rJ I• 1, Draft: SEIR NO . 88---1 & EIR NO . 86 -1 .)c t.,)ho r 13 , 1988 Page 2 of z t The improv4cn-�aits planned as pu is of the Initia:! pha s,� of ti project will be completed long befors any t :i.icks delavcring drill' icy equipment: and suppliYu wi. :. l need to he �.a the prc; r,-r.J-, area . The t is ( r) heavy trucks nrrivit=g on a daily avere.ge has4s will bo going slow, preparing to dirt, as they approach Lhe rroject` :_Uz_: 11Y:d therefore should ljose ric rzs;A to any s•::hool c.hi ?dren waiting for txhrjc11 bas on the east side: of Dulawnre Street . The risk wouia b+ less ghat. that t turn the numerous cars that drive c n Ve-,awar. e St. re; t at and above the speed limit . As t(.) the number of trucks , Mr . Johi. h . CarfRichae?. • s Lett or of peptembor 17 , 1986 estimated the number of heavy t rock trips required to support the dri l ling of each well . That: estimate remains 30 trips -per well . As each wall will take between. 15 anti 23. days to drill and complete, the number of heavy trucks visiting the site during the drilling phas:a on a daily average basis remains or less . Tne Tr' p C.-aneration Forecast on page 31 of : he ISEIR uses, daily average of 3 per day- to 1.)d conservative . Thank ,you for your, attention to these matters . Si.ncarely, Kell; Ma Assistan . P16nn .r -KM-. g bm �,,, ( 14 61 1) . r � 'r • ,. .,r . . N•.tip...r .N y.vV —... .. u - . . a.... ....W-.v .M�aY..-...V.F...w.J•./�Ir.fVV �•A J.� ty 7 or 7 t 0 11 Oeach Treasurer (`.orjc(.irned Ci t: i 1^+3:; X ')r iilrl:+; i lit,; L,)U B el3C I .it;lM�7i'::";': D1tAF 1' SUF'PLEi+SF!NTAL �''�FZ NO , 88--;1. AND El"? NC . 86- ). D 0 a i ;�h t hb i.c;siien raised in your letter of j SF:rreru ,er 13 , Ir/6Fi anJ hai fnlind tic:; fvllowi►n14 MAU The Inspector from the SCAQMD det.,2rmined that there was 110—dj -t pry eM. He determined that any dust tieing :'treated in the area was probably coming from the un' . dished ( ghat is , dirt) City st.ree:ts . No warning was sumt t.- ANGUS Pet: leum by the SC:AQMD or tiny ct ner agency . The comment sr-af.es that: area residents were subjected to unhealthy layers of du3t for a nina month per. icd between October 1 , 1-987 aria June 1 , 1988 . Initial project construction did not commence until aftrei November 27 , 1987 , however , when the City first issued a site grading permit . Const 1 uction activity ceased less than three months latter after the Preliminary Injunction was issued on February 18 , 1988 . During the period of construction, provisions of the approved Dust Contr-ol Plan including thv use of a water. Eruck were carried o-at fully. It appears that this comment has failed to distiaguish "turning radius" from street width , Fijure T of the supplemental EIR clearly shore that a truck with a tMining radjUs of 50 feet can easily turn from one street with a 40 foot street width (curb to curb) to another 40 foot wide street without requiring any special parking restrictions . (1460d) ?lease revie=,w thr� Angu:: Oi 1 company, for financial status and previous exl) rlenra in proje11.1:8 of this types . I can ' t understand with the coil abundance anrI prices of oil bt-. 3ziq H5 low as they are , how t1i s project cr:tild he economically fe: isiblc, during t;hetse. times . This piece of propei t:,y hFa.s barn tround a losses t.inie aria has nt!ver beers t'•.r:veloped by a lare r; oil --,ompa- ny . WsftY7 In this someone, pipe dream at the expense of: ;,Me r�:si.!�grsta� al s:+ :i hboncciod? Whet happens: if the project: doe t ' is produce as expect-.00 Will it be re-zoned arjain? I am closi nq wie.:ls the hopeL; that you will loop at this siti.ation LrJJil atir yoinL- U.;; 1101110OW11U::0 , 110; ftiLiii:c. to Hie, LILY or the. elirninat: ion of exi ,Yt:ing wells ire t:hc ourrounding areas , tbee.aitse e�!1 entua11y , theq. e uaI1�,, Sri 11 e]o1,)1ete. t hem se Ive9 The Angus Oil. Company is c-laiminy this is a unitization project in reality it is a new drilling project in a residential area which is against- the Z01,11.1sg ordinance . 1 Dope 1 do not: sound too arrogant; , however , I ain upset at what I have been hearing and seeing in. regards to t-iiis project , and I do .lot: believe it is in Hie- best: interiest: of .-lie ,^.ity or of the Urr:ounding are., I look Lo your n;:ompi- re,pon:ie . Sincerely , George Corry RESPONSE Your c.,,,,,,lerns are noted ,-nd your comnants will be forwa&ded L•o der.. :i s i r vir�tiakers for hhei r Consideration . 'hank you for your ai: ►:wnt: ion to t:hE:se inatt:urs . sincerely". Kelly �J n ri Assista t Planner KM bm Attachment : Response to Concerned Citizens of Huntington Beach Comments can Draft: SEIR No . 88-1 and EIR No . 86-1 ( 1459d-5) 1 . RESPONSE The wal.:!s surrounding the sites would coris:ist- of an earthton4 broken hlock wall , The Fio-ifict would be conditiont'.1 to comply with the landscaping requirements of Chapter .115 . 22 the HUntingto>> b 'ioh Ordinnnc e Code , Prior to thf: in .sta l lat:i.on of any landscaping ' i lsnds!_-Arline irrigation plan would bon submitted to the bepaztjncll of Development ;ServAces a a Public Works :_-.:r7 review and approval . COMMENT NO . 8 tJv,tw fi. . The standard setback for a res:ider.tlal. home; :is 15 feet . Since Lhis is uu induf Lr'. -;� l .1st+ , wouldi) ' L YOU t,211 l L() aoi:iaa LiadL set:baCks should be larger than 15 feet which would allow a larder buffer zone between the site and the residence . It would also decrease they possibilities of accidents . rt mast be. noted that: these rags stand a t ?w hung Led feet i_rc the air , and it an acci' dent did occur , it Would effect: the residence. RESPONSE The Project setbacks , in conjunction with the buffer provided by the City right-of-way , provides an adequate buffer between the. Project: and residsncfgs in the area . Please r. (: er to S4 . 10 of the SETU (pager, 37-43) Far a discussion on public health and safety issues . COMMENT NO. 9 8l.tesrnat:_✓e �i ;,�. I would propose that they drill near, the Civic Center which is a comnierciel. zoned area . Of course, it would cost the oil company more money to six-ill from that loci-ion, however , at: least it would blend in better . RESPONSE Please refer to S7 . 5 and 7 . 6 of IL-,he FEIR (FagF%s 61.•-63 ) , The site referred to in the comment: is zoned 9-1 . COMMENT NO . 10 Please '.asd page 7-1 of the EIR report on alternatives . I personally do, not like to be threatened by a condominium project being deverloP06' vs . a residential project . If the planning commission can sere condominiums being developed on a site that already has homes on it and oil wells , they must be blind . Also, I � believe the intensity should be reduced . As a matter of fact , this project should not even be s+ llclwed in a residential area as alrOady stated . This EIR report does not address the homeowners concerns and is very biassed in my opinion. Please read Environmental Check list forms , you will note, there sure is a lot of m%ybe ' s , ( 14 59d--4 ) I e r . "Well reriiice rigs Mill. be operated no more than 45 clays per yet bet:woen 7 : 00 %_ . m . and : 00 p . m. ")r: daylighi: hours , whl'.chever i ti %hoot.-.er: . No rnryrF>. than 4 well service t-igs may be on the premises at any r,ri+3 t:iwe . The service rigs shal..l riot exceedl 120 feet i.n height a1id slhall he doubllw--rnuff:led and utilize acoust:i ! binnkets . " COXMNT NO . 5 J I j u ri t purchased my first: horse and am concerned that if an emergen^y was to occur and t had to sell my hare, how would potential al buyers feel. ahou4: buying a hart surroundt.id by drilling r:iy& operating 24 hours a day? Would you buy a }come acroiis the street from a project like this? RESPONSE ' in .lanuary 1.98d , the Spr:ingf :.eld Property Trust was created to rrotect homeowners in trha area against: depreciation of their property resulting from the Project . Mi- . Corry ' s property is ` incIuded wit_hi.r. the area covered by the Springfield property Trust , COMMENT NO . b Zoning : This land is currently zoned as "0" which Y-. P dri peratimri, To allow this project to proceed , the City has to re-zone this area . The zoning was also written to protect the residential. area from new well. drilling . How can you allow this in a residential area which has been zoned for residential units . What good is zoning if you can change it all the time? It was initially zoned "0" to allow the existing wells to continue pumping which is fair since they have been here many years . RESPONSE ` Please refer to S4 . 5 of the FEiR Nc . 86--1 (pages 21--28 ) , which discusses Project consistency with the City ' s Zoning Law and General. Plan , COMMENT NO . 7 &QA hq & • '.i`?r� EIR report; states oiarr homes are 10 to 1.5 years old . My home is only 7 years old. Will the block wall surrounding the site blend or semi-match each type of housing feature . The homes along California Street between Rochester and Springfield have brick facades , will this block wall have brick incorporated .into its design? The landscaping a! 0und the site needs to be well maintained, bond ►hould be pe,Aed to insure this . We suggest that you take a drive by our homes, and take a look at them. (1459d-3) I 'Phi s p rrPo�3ecl dri l]. sit:"., i1r ocat:od hf,;:wec,n CaIi.for. ivi'I 1. reyet: and Delaware , lRac;hester and Springfield Street F and is Surrounded by residential hame>.s orr threa slden . The value of the pro j ec+: is in the range of 2S , 000 , 000 . 00 . 1: have been wat:c lying the City of lluntin:7Lon Beach develop and I like what: has been. approved , however , there, seems to be no way that a proj oct of this magni.t:ucli c r.)uld be constructed and not have an affect on the neighborhood . .1 have re.ce-rit; ly rocoived t.ho Environmental Impact: Report: aald T am concerned about: a few things in which I Would you L•o r.'cv-.ew anti con.-.egruenL-1y, respond to : RESPONSE : Project has been revised since 1386 • , The number of wells has been reduced to 30 - 45 COMMENT NO . 3 Drilling noise for a period of one ( 1 ) to two ( 2) years using a 1 , 000 horsepower electric motors for twenty-four ( 24 ) hours a day . Will you guarantee us that this di:i ll ing operation will nat;, be a nuisance? The EIR report is nut detailed enough in regards to the effect the noise level will have on the surrounding residence. , especially at night , low about" limiting the drilling period to daytime hours only . RESPONSIE: Please refer to the response to Cormnent 22 by the Concerned Citizens of Huntington Heach . COMMENT NO. 4 Maintenances of the "-ells . This will Or:Cur after tn6 we:lle, are � completed . Lets say they have 60 wells that: need to he cleaned two � tames a year . This operation takes approximately two days per well , which equals 120 days :gut of' a year a pulling rig will. be operating on the site creating noise . Perhaps you can request that they insulate these pulling rigs evert though the actual work occurs during the daytime hours . What about the neighbors that work out of their homes , have d&ytime boarders , and the people that work at night, will thin noise create a nuisaiicez in their case? 1 knew that a pulling rig will exceed the City noise ordinance if un-insulated .. Please respond on this with your views . One option is to limit the amount of hells to be drilled which ert turn will decrease the maintenance , The UNO Permit fo:: the Project , if approved, will include the l�oiio+rinq aon�9it�.an� , ( 1459d-2) s .;, -MOM City of Fluntingtor. Beach "M MAIN 17HELT CALIFORNIA 92SU Di:P,-%Fi'rmIFNT OF COMW 1!4"I"Y OF WA 01'N1FN"1' 8-0;dIng Divis1w 536,5241 HousIrf9/F1*Jvv@Iapm*ot Divisien 53"642 Planning Division 636.62'71 October .13 .. 19R'i Mr . George Carry 1801 California Huntington Beach , CA 92640 SUBJECT: DRAFT SUPPLEKENTAL EIR NO ., 88-1 AND EIR NO . 06-1 Dear Mr . Corry : Staff has investigated the issues ralsGd in your letter of October 6 , 1988 and has found the follc-,,�ing : COMMF.NT NO . I 1 Letter to Mayor Erskine and City Council members dated October 6, 1980 . I am re-submitting the attached letter dated JUIY 30t 1986 , A3 7 feel. there are many aspects of Lhis pvoject which are still valid concerns that I 11ave . My position in regards to this project remains unchanged as I feel that an Jr1d .1 _q5J1JA1 praivc-t 4n a rn idential neighborhood would be a detriment to our qualify living . I sincerely request that: you vote against thin project . RESPONSE : Your concern iN noted and your comment will be forwarded to decisionmakers kor their consideration . COMMENT NO - 2. ' Letter to Mayor Mandic and Council Members dated July 30 # 1986 My name is George Corry and I am a homeowner at the above stated address . 1*.y neighbors and I are ver,, concerned about a project which will be up for review by the 1)lanning Commission sometime in September . This project is being proposed by Angus Oil Co . which wants to drill 50 - 60 new wells over a period of two (2) yetars ., Angus Oil Co. has purchased two blocks of land, in which there are aVPtOzimstaly itis homes on presently. r::' + yy 4N• Y 122 Cal. . App 3d 813 ) . .Ar -.Jhawn Ly 'Ehe to comments , no new isslies or put'.enLiall.y sicinit:ic-lint. i.;npac.t s have benii. id,tntif:ied by the r.cmment:s on the ZTR . No revisions t:.� the SEIR are regtl:ired . Therefore, rac ircu lat: :inn it; not Thank you for your attention tc, these oyiattpr,s . Sincerely, Kelly Mai' d 1 Assistant Planner KM : g brit zc : Chambers Croup; Inc , 29:43- B Pullman St-::eet i Santa Ana , CA 92705 i Please ref .�r to the rusponso to Cuminent No . 12 . Please see also pages 1. 1 , 19 tired 41 of Hie and 1--age 4 --95 of the original EIR . Quantities of each hazardous chemi.i-al. projected for u,Se should be ostimate.rl . Ar, ar�allsi. s should be mach: of 'he impact of spills of the quantities oT reach chemical as well an combination of chemicals I011 the 511I'C':JUX1L 12 Please se o pages '18--41 of the D,SEIR. Based on the extremely low lave). of hazardous chemicril use , tha regulation of any suc.,h use by fedeval , state and local, rLgulati.oii , and the atringenz. spill control. features contained in the Project dr. tsign , the use at hazardous chlimi,cals wuu7.d not: have any significant irmpact::s . The SEIR does not address the traffic impacts associated with the construction of the ryas and wager: pipelines . There is no gas pipeline . + Please refer to the response to Comment No . 2 , under "Traffic Impacts , " Our review of t1e SEIR has pointed out several major deficiencies in the document including the omission of analysis of two major pipelines directly associated with the project: as well as not providing a comprehensive analysis of the cumulative impacts of the proposed project . Additionally , the systeras safety aspects of the proposed project and several other issues have not been adequately addressed . Substantial revision of the current Draft SEIR is therefore required . Since the revised document will undoubtedl-, identify sddi,,tibnal significant impacts , wlo believe that the revised document should be recirculated as a Draft SEIR to allow further review by both Responsible Agencies and the public before consideration by the decision makers of the City. AngweK The recirculation of the responses to comments on a draft: EIR is not required unless the responses contain subatantial now information showinig the possibility of a significant environmental ntal impact . ( See Pub . Re nource S Code 521092 . 1 ; Cal Admin . Coos, tit . 14 §15162 . 3 ;u tex Sonlf le rJa4gigg . ar,, v DO 0f suneryiSQU ( 1981) (1440it -15 tepresesurization . lnje'sctiol_ -.::11.; Fri 'l he loclat;ed away from Ipoorly abandoned wol:ls and in closer pr. oxil-tity to producing wells , ensuring that flea gas will t." l.aw to t' 18 prnr1110i ng wells . On pacle 43 , it comprehensive coat ingeanc,y plan i ,i required L•o be prepared i.i casa any leaks occur. ;in the 13 wells wlhic h. have not been abandoned to modern standards AM. -a The SEIR should di.scusii th-z ol. fires anti/or explosion at: the drill rigs in arld,itlCll LU t. lOkit. a::saci i,trld wiL-h oil si:or► ge: . The drilling !:guipment will be: equipped with Class III Blow Out Prevention 'Equipment as described in Figure 6 of the original EIR . Please see also Appendix F of the original EIR , "oil. and Gas dell Blowouts Prevention in Califurni.a . " Additionally , the reservoirs of the Projects are well known , having been produced for. o,ier 60 years . The reservoir pressure is well. oelow hydrostatic and will be oasily controlled by the drilling mud . Therefore: , all. anticipated subsurface pressu,:es will iv, contained by the. weight of the mud. If a fire should cccur. , the open cel le rE will allow the Fire Department to control it from the surface without entering the cellars themselves . Qmwt Ma., i The BEIR should discuss the potential for release; of gas containing H2S from both the facility and from the pipeline . Hazard footprints should be calculated be5ed on the concentration of 112S as well. as the volume in the pipeline. or well head . Please refer to the response to Comment No , 21 . coment .no• __aft The BEIR should diacusa the potential fer fire, and explosion from natural gars at the well head or in thts proposed pipeline . With respect to well head fire, please see the response to Comment No . .46 above. Also , as discussed in the response to Comment No. 12 , this project will use an ezisting gas gathering system . No incremental fire risk is created by the use of the existing system. Tho $ZYR should disausa the incremental impact of oil spills or fires in the Chevron crude oil pipeline. (1444dt-14) occurrence could occur durinci the 111v of: the pl-o-iect: . Thn a11,a lysi :; ol: this section is filly inadequate, lacking quantritat:ive analysis assuming reasonable worst--ease analysis and k`ai is to provide detai iel rni.tigat:it,n itipas:tres tO rAt:i.c3aLe ca17 re.cllsce the UOnCCS of an upset or ncc;icdenL . All a NO r, Please refer to pages 4 -52 - 4--56 of: the original ETF, ,end pages 37-43 of the SEIR . The c orartientat ol" .I.c characterization of the evaluation of ULe risk from fire i ;s incorrect . The SFiR States that the posbit)> licy o : a tic i , a 1dain vnt. :; hdr impact of the project: , although the likelihood of occurrence is very low . (See SEIR at p . 6 ) . The comment i 5 also incorrect in stating that it is " likely" that sucti all ovent could occur in the life of: the project . As stated in the SEIR, the likelihood is " rare " ( 1 : 10 , 000 -- 1 : 1 , 000 , 000 ) . Rare events have only occurred a few times on a worldwide basis . Therefore , it is extremely unlikely that a worat-caso fire of a Magnitude described in the EIR could occur . Q9110`t_ 19-1__71 4. Additionally, a preliminary rit3k management; plan and spill contingency plan should be provided during rcvi.ew of the SEIR in order to fEr11y e•,raluate the eftecti.venous of the programs proposed f0c mitigation . The Environmental Protoction rgtp.ncy, DivYSiOn of: Oi_ l. and Gas and the City of Huntington Beach all require a spill Contingency Plan befoie the facilities can go into operation . This will be none . Come .._7..5 ' The SEIR states that there will not be any impact caused by leakage of gas due to rcpressurizatilon of the formation . This conclusion ig based on studier indicating E^w current problems with existing wells . The proposed waterfiood project would initially substantially increase pressure within the formation and may cause gas leaks at wells that currently do not leak . Additional :studies are required to 'cdeter.mine. the extent of this impact and realistic: mititiatiion meisure:s such as resealing of wells , use of gas detectors in homes and .the use of evacuation plazls must be provided . Anamer This iscsum is discussed on pages 39 r 40, 42 and 43 cf the DSErR. Page 40 explains the affects of water flooding on gas leaks! , concluding that it will " reduce the amount: of free gas and lessen the possibility of gas leaks . " As stated on page 40 , any free gas will flow to areas of low pressure . The producer wells are areas of lore pressure, and the gas will, flow there throughout the process of ( 144od-13 ) ..an. I . 1 The faci. liti.erc rice not require vacuum trucks . Drains are provided in each cellar and in the c.ontaininaitt area of the oil handling facilities , If a spill upill should occur , the system is designed to Pump the spilled fluid back thi'ciugh the separation syate►n and into the tanks , ar described or, I)ragas 4 -1 ai r; 42 of the SEIR . The benzene tamission calculations shown in the ►)EIR were made for the Vu.i pout uE with thc: SCAQMD Rulej, 22.3 and 1401 (See Appendix No . 41 , These proposed rules are designed for analysis of a new source ' s potential to increase individual cancer risks . There are no guidelines within these proposed rules relating to low level , short term exposure risks associated with benzene emissions since this is not: thought to be a significant health risk by health authorities . CQrnrnent The SEIR fails to mention the expected concentration of H25 within the gas extracted from the well . Since sour gas occux's within the Huntington Beach Fields , the air quality analysis should include modeling of the exposure of 112.9 to area residents in the event of relea3e of toxic gas . &LUIOLU There is no 112S in the gas produced ftoiii i:he project reservoirs (See Appendix 4 , page 10 ) . i The SEIR , as well as the previous EIR did not quantify the magnitude � of impact of ttie noise associate with the drilling operation . The extent of mitigation afforded by the cont: ro ', measures have not been quantified in order to determine whether Impacts have been reduced to insignificance . An's ma r The project will meet the Huntington Beach Noise ordinance with Well known and understood technology. See noise analysis in the origi.►~<al EIR at S4 . 9 , pages 442 through 4 --50 , Appendix E of the EIR and Appendix 3 of the SEIR . Cg aant tits. 23 kisk uat/HURVU .-Ie h- The construction of a major oil and gas facility in close proximity to residential areas presents special systems safety problems . The analysix in the SEIR generally takes the aprroach that if an event is unlikely to occur, there is no impact. The ganeral state-of-the-art analysis for oil and gas projects base the project impacts on consequences of an accident, not, upon the probability of occurrence . it in likely that even an event of low probability of (1440d-12, The SEIR only cantains one rendc.-ring of L:ht, propo'sed does not show scale nor daaeu: it havc. a of perspective . Several staled renderings frorn several viei:I)nints would h,� nece,;sary to assess the vies; al inipact . N=101'r The people and autamobilan in the. renderinc are for tree purpose of r i I de T- t 3ho�-- A`. i-tq s u a 1(3 11 M r 41 i t: r r-,p s!c t: i v r o r show visibility at eye levcl . Because HiL, view of the Project: -i i te- would be the sarne front all viewpoints , except that gates would occur in two walls (as shown in Figure 0 . ) , additional. renderings would not differ from the one included in the DSEIR and would not pi. ovide additional assistance in evaluation visual impacts . The srrR does not describe thei air quality impacts associated with r,-onstruction of the gas and pipeline-s- . There is no gas pipeline , Please refer to the response to Comment No . 2 ., under "Air OuLlity" , for a discussion of potential air impacts . c2mmat-1H.Q..12 The BEIR also does not addres:w the dust related impacts noted by area home-owners during the initial cons t rucLic)n phase . Additional measures for dust control such as use of dust control chemicals should be discussed . AAMMI Please see Appendix 6 , page 1 , Response to Comment No . 2 , for a discussion of dust impacts currently noted by area residents . Mitigation measures fol, dust contrL. 1 are set forth at pages 41-42 of the original }SIR . According to the Public: Works Department of the City, these njeahures will adequately mitigate the Pro ject ' s dust impaCto . COMA M Although the SETR does analyze emissions associated with normal facility operation , It fails to calculate emissions associated with oil spills in the facility. Because the facility is in close pro-imity to residential units, the enissionst including public exposure to bentene, should be calculated for an episode where oil to 5011od and contained In the containment area and then cleaned up by vacuum truck. ( 1440d-11) 1 M'+ � 1 PI(Iatse r c.,r Lo Lite 1'u:i iit;'t; L,i �.c)isaiiic 11: No Mik'I;.'.I "FI-31:e1* Quality. " Flease* alas(;) nee pares 41-43 of. the WEIR ( establishing mitigation me=afiur 6 for the tolease of rnaterilIs from the project site) . The .13EIR fails t:o idLIlLitV impost. of disposal of t: ilt: ratw material. 0350 ci. at:ed %ri `-h t-hf- nrocessing of injection water . MZ-V= The " filtrate " f :orp thn watE."r filters con.,-;i:rL,i of e:loar injection water . This water will be injected into the underground reservoirs . The material filtered from the .produced water consists mainly of salt" of Silicon, Iron and Cal.c:.um, none of which i, hazardous . This material will be disktiose d of , as ne--essary, at a proper disposal site in c:nnf.ormance Frith regulations of golyerr_ing agencies . C©ttlmAnt �IQ ,�. i The SEIR fails to address the Impact of the prGposa:d project on the exiRting CC&R ' s for the proposed project . They DSEIR evaluates the environmental impacts of the Rr:ojeot against a baseline of existing environmental. conditions , as required by CEQA. The Project description and evaluation of impacts clearly identify and take into account the character of the neighborhood . � The DSEIR further �-valuatas Project consistency wilth City planning policies (see pageLi 21-28 ) . CEQA does not r©quire the evaluation of the. Project agairist pr ivsite contractual arrangements-: in the area . i i The SUR does not addre an the flood lighting required during the drilling process . No area flood lights will be used ( sea pages 29) . 1iie derrick will be enclosed and all. lights , except: the aircraft warning light ,, will be on the inxide of the acc:-,istical blannet . bights around the auxiliary equipment will be near ground level and well below th%3 top of the 30 , acou$tiral wall , (144Od-10) L - a wFkt,.,-r .l :inos , deatrtictiOTI of bridges (:pening of f is res in ground, and :tar d:,ilider. ) c*ouId not t-i) t,ignif i cant: . The Facri li. t y would shut: down unL4'.e.r a " tail...'Raf'-I" �;y'st eln, ai goon AN t.he- � jWCAIs: we nt ciff . No emarger;;;y s.ieuatir►r.[�j would be c.rFjaterl requiring in'ne dist;s) at: te lition by , Ur On of: , public oafaLy t�eraur�nt�l . The SEIR toLils to .' &,niti fy ;-he wj teya quality imparts associat fild with tho uvaiitru�:t.ic..ret and opi-It'at: iOY, or' Lku, gam pipal .140 and hrine pipeline . There is no gas pipeline required . Please refer to Uie response to C ,mineni No . 2 urdco- "Wager Quality . " The SEIR fails to idtantify the; water (lua 11. ty mpac;t& associated With i the potentia). rupture of the cr.uda, o.1. 1, pipeline carrying the oil produced by the proposed project: to the Ct',Lvrc,n facility, While we underatend that the use of an existing pipeline controlled by Chevron is proposed , the proposed project will neverthelesa cxoate additional quantities of oil ,shipped in the pipeline and the role&se of this additional oil should be addressed . AMMU .As discussed on page 41 of the SEIR, the addition of the Project ' s oil stream would reduces pressure on +,he crRade oil pipeline . Because the r:il from the Project: would enter the pipeline at a higher temperature than the oil currently in t:t;e pipeline, - it would reduce the vis:-�osity of the oil . This , in turn , would reduce pressure in the pipeline, thereby decreasing they poBssi bil ity of pipeline rupture when compared to existing conditions . Tharesforor Project.-related crude oil. in the pipelines would have the e3ff:ac-t of reducinq the possi,tailit7 of rupture , Evers if the p:pe li.nea ruptured, the only oil that would be released we uld be tt-e oil in the pipwl :nos between block valves . Automatic shutdowns would keep the incremental voiume of oil attributable to the Project at an insignificant level in the event, ut pipe line rupture . -C iL.XQ. I TIA,_) hydrology section dome not address the water quality impa.Cto to the groundwater aquifer due to the release of cxuda oi. l. , ,solvents or othertonic: material . The range of alternative avaluat t; d in the i SEIR :meets , and exceeds , this requi rnme-lit , The SEIR foi, Is to Identify an F.nviru nme ntally 13'upnriot Alternative as r.'equi rad by §'1.5130 of t to CF,,A guidelines . The Abandonment; of All Oil Producing Sites , §7 . 4 i$ identifi an the "environmentally praferable alternative" in S7 . 4 . 2 on age 60 . Co nt.��_ f The hEIR za :. ,.:. to provide a full list of pr.enarers as t:equired by The pri.vcipal. yre-parer:; are. i.zsted can paye 1 at: the SEIR , .'Md pertio-tts consulted are lasted on page 71 . � I 7'he S1:1R fails to >i(-16r:nrs the consequences of the tt . 4+ ea '- thquake on t?ke ope rfktion of t4ciAii;ie including Much effects as r. up ,.uring and ,,,)erturninq of tanks , rupturing of co i,:a :inrn})nt dikes and other accidents idents that would have a pot ant is l fc~ release of pre luct . This Am.mage would have the potential to affect thG neighboring resid-3- races :,Lnd would mxacerhate any pub.Lic. safet:Y ?.rnpacwF associated w; th damage. to residential units . No mitirpation me,azurps are provided in terms of ensergenry pi-oc:edures , mobile containm9nt facilities or the like to mitigate ary potent ;al ;impacts Associated with the release of ' pzuduct;.s during a seismic. event . anXV!a,. The effects of seismi.c events of. the Proj ?ct aLo des- gibed on pages 16 - 17 of the SEAM . The consequences of an M 8 . 0 or greater earthquake are described on Magi+ 17 . �s t-,ated on page 41, oil will be ehipped on a continuous basis , so than- all of the tankis in the Oil Storage area will. ;fever be full at the game time . The oil Storage area is located six toet below grade, and the area in currbunded by reinforced concrete retaining walls . The volume of this depressed retainin7 basin exceeds they Uniform Fire Code, and Division of Ail and Gas requi rementa, by a factor of 2 (p. 42) . even if the retaa,ninq wails ruptu;ed, the retaining area would hold oil releamod by tanks which buret o: overturn . his stated an gaga 17, if tlxe epicer►tear of the earthquake were oe~Sted in the area, nc.1 known mitigation measures could ensure that the Cumulative eff6cts of the carthquake ( inr.inding the breakage of ( 1440d--8) comma L No The aEIR fails to address a full ranee of altai-rtatives . In particular, it does not address the alternative of processing oil at a site remote from the prapcaed project area . Thi,a alternative would substantially reduce the rystems safety impact sasociuted with a fire in the storage tanks . It also does not address the No Oil Storage Alternative nor does it address alternative designs of the proposed facilities on the proposed €sites . Additionally, the document does not consider an alternative where the unprocessed oil. is transferred via a new pipeline to the Chevron facility , eliminating the need for separate, processing facilities . W&MU The DSEIR evaluates ten alternatives to the proposed Project . In addit:,on to the "no project " alternative, twu revisions to the proposed Project are evaluated ( 'Reduced Intensity Alternative" and "Dore Intense. Drilling Program" ) . Four alternative sites are Faxamined ; the evacuation of one of these alternative sites examines two potential configurations . The overall. abandonment of oil production is evaluated , as is the development of a mediurn--density- residential project" on the Project site. � The "processinc, " merely consists of separating the: oil from water. . If this took place "on a site rernot•e" from the Project site, two additional pipelinus would have to be constructed . one would transport oil. ana water to the remote site; the other would return. processed water , under pressure . The Chevron Ear:'. li ty Ms merely a re-pump station and does not have the capacity to separate coil, from water . if oil were not. �,;t:ored on the Project site , any risk of fire would simply be moved to anethe:r area . Furtheimore , the hddi ' ional water pipeline would create a hazard of rupture because it would be under pressure . The water pipeline for the Project , in contrast , is a low pressure pipeline . The currant design of the Project i 5 intended to. mitigate v _sual, noise, and traffic impacts of the Project on the surrounding neighborhood . Alternative designs were not evaluated in the SEIR because they would not result in the mitigation of impacts . CROA does not require analynxs of eatery imaginable alternative, The State CEQA Guidelines state as fallouts : "The range of alternatives required in the EIR in governed by the rule of Treason" that requires the EIR to set tcrth only those aNlkernativpe necesser to permit a reasoned choice. The key ; isue is whither the selection and discussion of alternatives fasters informed deolsion-making and Informed y' public participation. An EIR nerd not CarisideL an alternative whoixe effect cannot be reeasonab,,y ascertained and whom impleatentati+on iR remote and speculative. " (Cal . Admin. code, tit . 14 S15126) . ( 14a0d-7) :LL MILK r _ _ _ t of past , prereent , and reasonably anticipated future projects , or a sunwary of projections contained in an adopted general plan or related Planning document . (IA,) Tit* commend; states that cumulative impacts relating to seismicity, hassardoux materials , noise and water quality were not adequately diacusaedl . The DSEIR concludes Chet the Project would not have advextse effects on water quality or adverse effects resulting f ort 71 ;�xardous materials . Thereforet, the DSEIR does not: analyze 1'.tlr.tive impacts in thebe aroas , because the Project would riot, tribute to the impaetr; of any other projects in the aida . . .. tr, gution measures for .•oise impacts take into account cumuli tive noise impacts . The Project is required to comply with the City ' s Noise Ordint.nce , thereby ensuring that the rUMuJMLi.Y-2 noise level in the Project vicinity will not exceed community noise standards . Additionally, cumulative noise impacto are discussed in DSEIR No . 88-•1 on page 52 . The Project is engineered to withstand seismic events up to an earthquake of M 5 . fi . Even in an earthquake of Chit; rnaVnitude, the well cellars should not break. (DSEIR at p . 17 . ) As described pore fully in the response to Continent 10 , the subsurface design of the oil. stot age area should prevent vAie release of oil ""it light: of the Cumulative effects of such a major earthquake, however , including the breakage of hater lines , destruction of bridges , f iss,irea opening 'An the ground, and t,-ndinq of rails ( see J�1_ ) , the STIR concludes that significant unavoidable adverse impacts could result if an earthquake of M A . 0 or greater rccur5 . It is also important: to recognize that the cumulative impacts of the proposid V roject must be compared to ex.isting conditions . tlnde-. existing conditions , a major earthquake would damage operatin-. tank bat '•,erjes , none of which is engineered to achieve the level oaf se.i :;mic safety— required of the Project . A major earthquake would rupture the tanks and ..ause many flow lines to break , resulting in oil spills . ThereEor. e , the Project would rtaduce Cumulatz.ve effects on soismic safety, by removing 22 wells and 7 associated tank batte ties which could be damaged by an earthquake of ljwer magnitude than, would affect: the Project . $15130 of the State CSQA Guidelines does not require an analysis of "overall cumulative impact- . " The term is not ased in CECA, and the meaning of this comment is unclear . It appears that the author of the comment is requesting rj judgment as to the "overall" significance of all of the, impacts of the Proj ct , and further requesting mitigation messures for this '*overall" impact . If all i0divids)PI impacts are mitigated to the extent feasible, the 60vibrall" iarpaCt is also mitinat:ed to the Ghent feasible. "The "overall* Significance of the hr.oject ' s irtpacts is an issue for decAsion-mokers to determine, in deciding whether or not to ;Approve the pro j vet . ( 144Qd,-6) `' A Ui r � ► 1 r Where passible, this SEIR incorporates specific criteria . For example, the significance of impic;:s from noise is measuEed against the City Noise Ordinance . In other instances , the determination of "significance" was related to the context of the activity . For ozample, the judgment: as to the aesthetic impacts of the project is largely subjective ., Because tho project, has cause controversy in the neighborhood, the Ertl concludes that the project would have a significant unavoidable adverse impact on aesthetics . (See SEIR at page 4 , 29 . ) The SEIR is an important source of information regarding the potential signifir.,anco of impacts . Decision-makers will also take into account other sources of information, however, including wr ' tten and oral testimony by the, public and public agencies , in reaching their determinations as to the significance of the Project ' s impacts . 'Aa:e effectiveness or mitigation measures and the significance oi: c'esidual impacts have been clearly identified , both in the Summary se,;tion and in the discussion of each area of potential impact The sections enti. ..letl "Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impac+:s" identify any impacts which have not: been mit-Agated to a level of insignificance . This is true of all seetivns except the section on � Noise in the suaunary ( f 2 . 9 ) , the ;.section on Traffic &.0 Circulation Impacts in the teat ( §4 . 6 ) , and the section on Energy Conservation � in the text (S4 . .12) , where this statement was inadvertently omitted . This duels not mean , however , that the level, of residual impact has not been identi t- ied for these impacts . The text of the DSETR states clearly that there will be no significant unavoidable adverse noise impacts . ( see p . 37) . The Suq nary section stater clearly that there will be no significant unavoidable adverse impacts relativig to traffic and circulation ; see p . 5) or energy conservation (see p . 6) . Therefore, for every impact, the SEIR identifies the effectiveness of mitigation measures . comer ti3t" Although the SEIR dons identify various projects for cumulative analysis , it fails to provide an analysis of the overall cumulative impact , determination of the significance of this impact and formulation of mit-irlation measures as requires in S15130 of CEQA . The snalys=s fail % to reflect the full range of cumulative impacts particularly For systems safety, seismicity, hazardous materials , noise and water ;uraity. The State CEgA Guidelines provide that 1*oumulat:ive impacts shall be discussed When th ir,g significant , " (Cal , Admin. Code, Tit . 14 g15130(a) , MphasiO added .) The discussic:A "shall reflect the severity cf the impacts and tWr likelihood of occurrence, but the discussion mead not provide as great detail as is provided of the effects attributable to the project ailone . ^ (.J&, at S15130 (b) . ) The discussion of cumulative impacts may rely on a lust ( 1440d-5) r4 r The excess produced gas from the Project would be metered an the recil.ities Site end delivered to the exiating Chevron low preenure gss gathering system under Huntington Street. No now gas pipeline will be required by the Project . The Project Site is rather unique in that the proposed drilling and proeassing site is located directly adjacent to reei,dentiarl, units . The SSIR does nct address the impacts in enough detail necessary to determine the actual impact , nor does it identify specific mitigation messu:es to reduce any identified impacts . Of particular concern is the release of toxic materials during accidents and spills. as well an the migration of gas due to the repressurization of the fr,rmation . a Within the City, mor,: than 20 drillinq and processing sites are locatad in residential areas . Tharefore, the Project- s not "unique" . The Facilities Site is not located "directly adjacent " to residential areas . 1t is separated by public rights-of-way can all rides . xn contrast , a number of existing drilling and pr.ocessir,q sites are -directly adjacent" to residential areas , without the buffer provided by public streets , The impacts and mi.4i.gat ion meavures concerning toxic materi• al,3 , spills and migration of. gas ? re discussed in S4 . 10 on pages 39 through 43 of the SEIR . In addition, please refer to the responses to Comment Number 2 , under "Water Quality , " and to the responses to Convnent:s Numbers 10 , 12 , 23, 250 26 , 28 , 29 and 30 . Cam.pia, The SEIR fails to identify the criteria that were used for the determination of significance of impacts . Additionally , the effectivensse of the- mitigation meauures and the significance of the residual impacts have not been clearly defined . Anamr The $X1R f`GLL6WS THE CRITI NT.A FOR SIGNIFICANCE ESTABLISHED BY LAW. The State CXQA Guidelines provide as follows : "The determination of whether a project may have a significant � effect on the envirowftnt calls for a careful Judgment on the Pert of the public agency involved , weed to, the extent possible on scientific end factual data . AA-.iy &APIAWon of fiCant eff9wt is not Rgsnila,lo, h$cauttg the Riunill anan._9f,...a n_..Sg.,t#.Y tjL nfaY� tjR,th_t hg_s e t�.,.1, 114 Cal . Admin . Code, Tit . 6 , §15064(b) (1440d-4), 1 pipeline will be installed, surveyed , inspected, and the trench backfilled in one day. During the day, barriers would ensure that pedestrians do not approach tranches . This is standard operating procedure in the construction of underground pipelines . No significant unavoidable public: safety impacts would result from construction of water pipeline . Air QuaIJLX : The only possible air impact from construction of the pipeline would be the temporary impact of dust emission . This impact is discussed on page 4-•37 of the original FUR,• which states as follows : "Temporary impacts will result from project construction activities . Air polluta'ats will be emitted by construction equipment and dust will be generated by grading and site preparation , " The mitigation measures sek forth on page 4•-41 shall apply to all. construction phases of the project , including the can-9t.ru-::tion of the water pipeline . Hktrjg QU&Jity : As described on paye 20 of the SEIR , the water line � would) be buried approximately 30 inches below the street surface . � It would not encounter any s ,irface water . Even if water from the pipeline reached groundwater , this would not have a significant affect , as explained in t•he original EIR cn page 4-12 : "The water round in ( bath shallow and deep groundwater) a uifcrs is fox, the most art brackish . Potable w'c;ter has g part , been extracted from aquifers in the Huntington Beach area, although usually only in areas east of the Newport'-Xnglewood Fault . The project site is v ist: of the fault and is , in fact- , located between two branches of the fault . Injection of water and Pztraction of oi , in the oil-bearing strata will not have a significant effect orr the quality of groundwater because the wager currently is not usable for other domestic or industrial uses . " (page 4- 12) . Furthermore, the water pipeline will be monitored with automatic shutdo,7n pressure sensors so that any sudden pressure drop will trigger an alarm and shut dow,i the transfer pumps . This will ensure that any release of water is minimal . The developmen� of the grater pipeline would riot have any significant unavoidable adverse impacts on water quality. The SUR does not address the impacts associated with the construction of a gas pipeline of the Chevron facility. As doscribe4 under No. 2 above , there could be significant impacts associated with construction of the pipeline as well as the public ssfe,ty impacts associated with a potential pipeline rupture. ( 1440d-3) y� 4 (mitigating) environmental impacts and some adverse environmental impacts . For example, a number of. alternatives could mi t ighte impacts in one location, while resulting in the potential for adverse impacts in another location . In order to avoid oversimplifying the potential Rffects of alternatives , thereby misrepresenting the extent to which they could mitigate impacts , the Summary discusses mitigation measures for the, proposed Froject . A full discussion of the positive and negative environmental effects of alternatives is set forth in S7 . 0 . Areas of controversy and issue: to be resolved are identified on page 2 . As stated on page 2 , these issues are discussed in greater detail in Appendix 6 , which includes a complete response to comments submitted by the Concerned Citizens of Huntington Beach following the Notice of Preparation For the SEIR . The Draft SZI9 fails to address the e4virc:nmentel issues associated with the construction of a water pipeline from the Chevron facility to the proposed project site . Construction of such a pipeline would have the potential to create traffic , air quality, noise and public safety impacta that are not addressed in the document . Furthermore, the water qual .ty impacts are not addressed should the pipeline rupture during operation . AnMer I Traf ,Mgtg : The route of the pipeline is described on pr a 18 of. the DSEXR, which states that the pipeline wi L be installed from Golden West Street , easterly along Clay Avenue to Huntington Stxaet , then southerly along Huntington Street from Clay Avenue to the Facility Site at Springfield Avenue and Htntington Street . Page 32 of the DSLIR states that traffic may be disrupted ove. a short period (four weeks) , and sets forth mitigation measures . These mesbures provide that no more than one lane of traffic shall be closed during the day, that no :vanes shall he losed at night , and that bue! intersections shall be eythbrt bored or plated over so that traffic interruptions will be kept to a minimum. {' Na"*: Noise impacts from the construction of the pipeline are described on page 37. A backhoe would be used during the construction of the water pipelinea . Double mufflers will be u5nd on boa aha0 d• ieq the construction of the water pipeline. Any residual noise impact would not be significant , because it would be temporary in 'nature and Mould only occur during the day. Resiaenta Of each block %aul4 only be affected for approximately one dal , JUhJLC, - : The only potential public safety impacts would be eithik" tosr the possibility of rupture of the pipeline or from 200iltbt• if Wastrians have access to trenches during the brief periods during which they would be open . please refer to the discuStIon of Water Quality. below, for a discussion of the possibility of rupture . As stated in the SH R on pages 32 , no trenches will be left open at night, and several hundred feet of (1440d-2) n;11. `1` 1 G'ty of Huntington Beach ,l O MAIN 1ITOEET (d,ALIFQRNI/!6� DEPARTMgNT OF COWUNITY P11V6L.QPMXNT w RvOdkv bhleean 0254 I .. Ne�tins►'Reed�wetlwp�rlwrt Dle lri m 5064642 hle w1 to DlWolm 6304ZY1 j, October 13 , 1986 1 Concerned Citizens of Huntington Hsach c/o Ms . Mary M . ga •.rish, Trea • rar 1919 Alsana Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92648 SUBJECT: Draft Supplemental 91R No . 88-1 and EIR No . 86--1 Door Citizens : Staff has investigated the issues revised in your letter of September , 196d and has Gourd the following : Comte�nG l�o . ,� The summary of f indi.ngs fsi Is to conform to C� 5 3.23 of CEQA. to that the sumemary .hbould include all significant ?,mpar.ts and mitigation measures as well as identification of alternatives that coulO reduce these impacts to significant The summary f€ils to list all significant impacts ideantifie4 in the main react of -the document . The summsry does not discass alternotive s , areas of controversy or i(N Issues to be remolved . AMU= The 06%mmory ok, Wivironm ntal Impact*" idea?"i.fisis t1�e 15i9fnifiCant Impatts set fPrth in the tort cf the 914, �a rubnequont CoMwnta , 06 outhot of, tbfa can et b#R stated that w number of �Mvfgtx not Idecitiftod to t test could occux, or tb►ot sos:e impact# #ro AA jfi*&At � thAn is etat$6 in the text of the $1$ � U6 )r0$PQnN415 to . . bowwwwx i, �th* 0001"Oto so not Went i f y *or .Nl" Impocto xegVI OA9 1A0400000 in tho suarmety section of the SXIR. T; The ,Xusftary cloarly sets fort_b mitigation measures 'vhich Would u itiudue:e ViVnificont effects of the project to the **t*nt faoo�ble+ . The Sumary its not required to discuss sltprinstivers, excopt to the extent bhat alternatives are d;isc%A,scned in evaluating methods of mitill6biny is+pMcts . Lin the ce$s of tlaa pkiterpstivAps to the Prf ject, k', ha over,0. the eito cnatLvos g9nesraliy would hove +soma positive wlrb V RESOLUTION IRO. 1407 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APB THE CITY OE xuarTIMMM 83ACK& CALI FORma, AnOP' ma SUPPL NTAL ENVIR001EXTAL I14PACT REPORT NO. 88 - 1 (SEIR 86--1) AND EN'JIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO . 86-1 (nIR 86-1) FOR THE SPRINGFIELD OXL RECOVERY PROJECT LOCATED ON TWO BLOCKS QN OPPOSITE CORNXRS, SOUTHEAST AND NORTHWEST, AT THE INTERSECTION OF SPRINGFIELD AVZWUE AND CALIFORNIA STREET AND INCLUDIXG 160 ACRES OF SCATT89ED "ELL OPERATIONS BOUNDED QENERALLY BY FLORIDA STREET ON THE EAST AND SEVENTEENTH STREET ON THE WEST: BETWEEN YORKTOWN r AVENUE ON THE WORTH AND MEMPH I S AVENUE ON THE SOUTH. WHEREASo the Springfield Oil Recovery Project ' s related entitlements and Supplemental En,►ironmental Impact Relicrrt No . 88-1 have been prepared ; and Environmental Impact Report No. 86-1 was adopted and certified by the Planning Co=ission an September 3, 1986 and City Council on October 20, 1986 ; and The City of Huntington Beach was the lead agency in the preparation of the Supplemental and original Environmental Impact Reports; and All persona and agencies wishing to respond to notice duly given have been heard by the Planning Commission Dither through written notice or during a public !tearing on October 18, 1980 , and such responses and coaeaents an were made were duly noted and raapOed to, f`I WWo 'T ZFORffi, BE IT 920OLV'ED by the Planning Comrniadion r of the Citlr of Huntington beach as Follows i Y 1 a n f „44A K, SECTION 1 . The Planning Commission does heraby find that Rupplowntel Environmental. Impact Report wo . 06--1 and Envii.;,nmental Xmpaet Report No. 66-1 have been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and all state and local guidelines therefore . SECTION 2 . The Pla,ining Commission has considered 311 significasnt effects detailed in Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No . 66--1 and ??nvironmentarl. Impact Report No . 66--1 , together with existing and proposed measures to miLlgate Nurh significant effects . (Exhibit A) SECTION 1 . The Planning Commission further finds that through the implementation of the aforementioned mitigation measures , the majority of the potentially adverse impacts asso+ciat-ad with the Springfield oil Recovery project can be eliminated or reduced to a. ieval of insignificance . SECTION 4 . The Planning Commission finds that the benefits, accruing to the city, both economically and socially, by virtue of the consolidation of existing oil producing operations to r single elite, abandonment to modern standards of many existing wolle and replacement to modern standards of existing tanks ` OvOrrietR the unmi.tigatabie effects detailed in Supplemental °7, :* 80090am"tal Impact Report No . f5-1 and N'avironmenta ' Impact Mo . ,r • •i-I and the attached statement of overriding considerations �A 1 i 'w got +� SECTTOM S . The planning Commission of the City of Huntington Reach does hereby adopt and certify as adequate f Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No . 88--1 and aduYt: and r' VeCertify as adequate Environmental Impact Report No . 86-1 and � recommends that they City Council adopt and certify as adequate p Y Supplemental Environmental ImpaCt Report No . 88-1 and adopt and r. recertify as adequate Environmental Impact Report No . 86- 1 . PASSED AND ADOMM by the planning Cowission of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meating thereof held on the day of 1988 , by the following raY1 tali vote : AYES : NOES : ASSENT : ABSTAIN : ATTEST: hike Adams Victor Leipzig Plea ping Commission Secretary Plannitg Coiwission Chairmau 1,7 a; 1A• I' �I. ,A i '.f�ti��4A�Af�FM144S�1F',A6S+w'I�slV.4c a •�: ri_'tv�ra, '•.trit, i.aa, ._.,.,_.�:_ __ ...:y_�a'� R• ,N F ii A N N ,r RE30LUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCI�s OF T8Z CITY OF . HUNTINGTON BEACH , CALIFORNIA , ADOPTING SUPPLEMENTAL R: ENVIRONME'NTAL• IMPACT REPORT NO . 88--1 ( SEIR 68-1 ) AND ENVIROVMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO . 860-1 ( EIR 86-1 ) FOR THE SFRINGFIELD OIL RECOVERY PROJECT LOCATED ON TWO BLOCKS ON OPPOSITE CORNERS, SOUTHEAST AND NORTHWEST AT THE INTERSECTION QtP SPRINGPIELD AVENUE, AND r; CALIFORNIA STREET AND INCLUDING 160 ACRES OF SCATTERED hi•: WELL OPERATIONS BOUNDED GENERALLY 13Y FLORIDA STR&E;T ON y• THE LAST AND SEVENTEENTH STREET ON THE WEST, BETWEEN YORKTOWN AVENUE ON T'IE FORTH AND MEMPHIS AVENUE ON THE SOUTH WHEREAS , the SpringfJel.0 oil Recovery I2roject ' S related entitlements and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 88-1 here beer: pi:epared; and EnvirorimenLal Impact Report ► e . 86-1 was adopted and � certified by the Planning Cuminission on September 3 , 1986 , and � i City Council. on October 20 , 1966 ; and . i The City of HunLingt:on Beach was the lead agency in tl-.e preparation of the Stlppleffte.ntal and original Environmental Impact P.eportf; and ` All persons and agencies wishing to respond to notice duly given have been heard by the Planning Commission either thro,.igh a' written rsatice or during a public hearing on October 16 , 1988 , aad such responses and comments as were made were duly noted and It"VQnded to. All persons and agencies wishing to respond to notice duly 40W have been heard by the City Council either through written 'Or. • 4uring a public hearing on November 21 , 1"88, and such { ^ �0400nApos and comments as wore made *rere duly noted and t responded to . 1. I TA li Y f r ,c yc„ t1 ' u" NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED by the Citry Council of the City of Huntington Beach as follows : SECTION 1 . The City Chun,i. l dries hereby find that Supplemiintal Environmental impact Report No , 88-1 and Environment&I Impact Report No . 66-1 have been completed in C'. compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and all state and local guidelines therefore , SECTION 2 , The City COUnc.-L" I has considered all significant. effect;; detailed in Supplernent:a.l Fnvironmenital lnpac. : Report No . 88•-1 and FoViroilme:,t•al impact Report: No . 86--11 together with exiaLirlq and proposed measures to mirigate such igni4icant eftect :� ( Cx�� it�it A ) . �;ECTIOM 3 . The City COUr1Ci1 further finds that througt-) the implementation of the atoremenLioner) mi.t- :icgat,i on measures , the majo,. it) of t.:re potentially adverse impacts associated with the Springfield Oil Recovery project can be elini. nat:ed or reduced to a level of insignificance . SECTION 4 , The City Council finds that the henef its accruing, to the city, both economically and sociatly , by virtue of the consolidation of existing oil producing operations to a � J ' single site, abandonment to modern standards of many existing Well$ and replacement to modern standards of existing tanks ' override the onmitigatable effects detailed in Suirp.lemen4al '�f•.. . Envitronmental Impact Report No . 88-1 and Envit,onmental Impact ary' Report No . 86--1 and the attached statement of everri.dind considerations ( Exhibit B) , r -2- 5954 r ` ' 1 " - im* A ;i�•�i.Y•• ry I SECTION 5 . The City C ourit: i, Of Lhe .'ity of Huntington beach does hereby adopt .arid certify as adequate Supplemental Environmental TmpaRct Rerort No . 88-1. and adopt and recertify as r, ti ;.„ adequate Envirunmental Impact Repori: We , 86--1 . PASSED AND ' ADOPTED by the City Council ,�f the City of Huntington Beach at a r ^gular meeting thereof held an tt-e list N. day of gvr fiber , 1988 . Mayor A'M'EST : APPROVED AS '�0 FORM : City 1 �k //•-�w �� i= City Attorney' REVIEWED AND APPROVED : INITIATED AND APPROVED: , 7 Gity Admi Stra►.or_+.�. V ACtiri . D reCLQt toMmu:1it" +: Devel.cpment I 1, Cf •'•i, 177r i 1 ' I A 1 wp• � +^ Ilwd '441T f � f� Res. No. 55954 STAIE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY �F MNGE ; s s : if" TY DF MUN INBTOM BEACH ) It CONNIE BROCKWAY,, twr duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex•-orfficio Cler;' of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative , cote of at least a majority of all -the members of said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on tie 21st day of November , 19 �BWw� by the following vote: j AYES. . wouncilmembers: rArly. Green, r king, ,MUS. Bannister NOES: Councilmewibars. Raley. Winch011.__. ..._.....� ABSENT: Councilmemhers: Niue- y` '7"eFR a_` d ex-of'ficlo Verx of the C i•ty Council of the City of Huntington Beach, Californ;a 5955 . y �r. Pr' i' 1 ORDINANCE, NO . 2980 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CIT'f OF H►JNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THS HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE 3Y AMENDING SECTION 9061 TO PROVIDE FOR CHANCE OF ZONING PROM OLDTOWN SPECIFIC: PIAN �+ (DISTRICT TWO) WITH Otf, SUFFIX TO OLDTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN I:. (DISTRXCT 'TWO) WITH OIL 113UPPIX FOR DRILLING PURPOSES ON REAL, PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED BUTWEEN DELAWARE STREET TO THE 4ASTo ROCHESTER AVENUE TO THE SOUTH 'CALIFORNIA STRREET TO THE HEST, AND SPRINGFIELD AVENUE TO THE NORTH . ( ZONE C11 ANG8 NO . 98•-11 ) WHEREAC , pursuant to state Planning and Zoning Law, the Huntington Beach Planning C )mmission and Huntington Beach City Council have had separate public hearings relative to Zone Change No. 68-11 wherein both bodies have carefully considered all infurmation presented at said hearings, anti after due consideration of the findings and recommendation of the Planning Commission and all evidence presented to said hearings , the City Council finds that such zoQe change is proper and consistent with the general plan , NOWO THEREPOREO the City Council of the City of Huntington I Beach does ordain as follows : . sECTION 1 . The following described real property , generally y known as the full block bounder- by Delaware Street to the east , Rochester Avenue to the south , California Street to the west , and Springfield Avenue to :.he north , is hereby changed from Oldtown Specific Plan (District Pwo ) -O to Oldtown Specific Plan (District Two )-,)1. : Tract No . 12 747 being :� subdivision of Lots I to 20 , 1.-iclusive , in Block 1804 of the Vista Del mar Tract , � Huntington Beach ab reno::ded in Book 4 , Page 15 of the Miscellaneous Maps of orange County , CA . 1 29PQ I , r y„ ,I WTION 2 . Section 9061 of the I. , ntington aeach Ondinamce od , Dletrict lip 11 ( Sectional District Map 2-5-11 ) it hereby ` *mended � reflect the change contained in this ordinapee and on tho nap attached herst,o « The Direct%,r of Community Development is 1 • hevaby directed to 'prepare and f.►.te an amended map . A COPY of said district map, as amended, shall be available for inspection r the office of the City Clerk . SECTION 3 . This ordinance shall take effect thirty days r after its pas^age. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City council of the City Of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 5th_ day of December 1988 . 1 , Mayor i� ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM : C1+ er c -- - C ty Attorney 164 A D 'PPROVj�D s INITIATED AMD AMOVED City Administrator � Acting Director of Community Development: be i I r 2 - 2960 l �I %4- W %.ow • tom— - ' - ..• •` f � 0 � + f CF �e-a ca RA R2 C2 i f CF-E-CD R2-0 R2 R2 �a oa -C I CF~E -mo t -CO-0 Cc—R Al Rl fu Rt R. -CD-Il -oc� 1 0 0 ! .� . IL v I -., A �►'�� RI-0 �. ,� t; -� a -o -a o ate a es-a ( ----� - RI RI 1-0 ftl Rl Ott .. �- .. �> itniw+�iprt MCI ', Y y` 1 LY f ,Jl 1r1�,1 Ir ., t,.' • 11 �1 j•r M + I 1 . 7 Ord. No. STATE OF CALIFORNIA i TY Of aE s:: CM Of HMMITIION BFACH 4, � ,i•, I, GONNA BROCKWAY, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; than the foregoing ordinance was read to said City Council at a regular meeting therof held on the Ust ay of November 19 88, and was again rend to said City Council at a regular meeting therof held on the 5th day of December , 19 88 , and was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of i ' all the members of said City Council ' AYES- Counci lmem5ers: MacAllister, Green, Wifnchei.i, Bannister, Mays, Silva, Erskine NOES: Councilmembers : 3 None � ABSENT: Counci i members-, Mane , V City Cleri, and a off ci o M erk of the City Ccunci 1 of the City of Huntington Beach , California r 2960 f y i Cow R Pave 12 - Counicii/Agoo y Minutes - 11/21/18 - IN11131 In K A a 11L M WR L V.- The MN,yor announced that thi s was the day and hour Set for a public' hearing 00411d open from Wyeober 21 , 1088 to consider the adoption of Resolution Q ,. Nfeissity relative to acquisition of surface ail interests in connection k : t : letian of the Pha:e 1 Project withirs the Main-Pier Project Area as tided. (121 b 123 - 2nd Street. 120 d 122 - 3rd Street, - A.P. 024-166-02 A notion was made by Bannister, seconded by Kelly, to continue the open public h6drin to December Si 1988 to consider tht adoption of Resolution of Necessity relative to acquisition of surface oil interests in connection with faftl etion of the Phase I Project within the Main-Pier Area as amended. The Wt on carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Kelly, Green, Finley, Erskine, Bannister NOES: Nana s ABSENT: Mays, Winchell (out of the room) Councilman plays and •Winchell returned to the room. ci�11.,P1 RUE HEA-R_I,16, ,„SSTAINEd„ E%;„•AND DENIMAEML .. si., 8 AM AL Afi=L «. ., The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing to cobsidor an appeal to Planning Commission's Approval of Zone Change No. 8841/Use Permit No. 88-25/Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 88-1 and Environmental Impact Report No. 86-1 . topjItintl: Angus Petroieum Corporation s' A00t1 Pants: 1 . Councilwoman Grace Wi nchel l 2. Concerned Citizens For Huntington Beach a � The project site consists of two blocks located on opposite Corners ws: fxkA (Tract 12747) : bounded by Springfield Avenue,. Delaware Street, Rochester Avenue and California Street, and fi m (Tract 12746) : bounded by Toronto Avenue, California Street, 5prir,'p- eld Avenue and Huntington Street . fta=&A1: Zone Change: Rezone Block A (Tract 12747) from "O1dtown Specific Pla"istrict Two--Oil Facilities (OT-2-W to u0ldtown Specific Plan-District Tyra I 1 Faci i i ti es with Oil Dri l l i ng(OT-2-01 )" to allow the drilling of new oil wells. UU_ Permit: 7o develop an oil consolidation drillsite or, Block A and asso- ciated oil facility on Block B. Also requested is a reduction of exterior sideyard s3tbacks from ten (10) feet to a Minimum seven (7) feet for the north and south elevations of both blor';s. 111'71q 0.i, A -MAW t Page 13 - Council. ^1Jency Minutes - 11 /21/86 The City Council is required to certify as adequate ups of Env ronmental Impact Report No. 88-1 and recertify Environmental 10pact 8eport No. 86-1 with a Statement of overriding Considerations prior to ally fiction on Zone Change No. 88-11 and Use Permit No. 88-25. The City Clerk announced that all legal requirements for notification, publi- cation and posting had been Met, and that she had received six communications regarding the matter. Against the project were the following: Pamela A. Steele, Concerned Citizens for Huntington Beach, dated November 4, 1988; Mary Parrish, Treasurer, Concerned Citizens for H ,B. , dated September 14, 1988; 04ryi Phillips dated September 26, 1988; and Anita Young, dated November 18 , 1988. In support of the project , were Milton H. Marow, dated October 29, 1988 and Angus Petroleum Corporation , dated November 17, 1988. The City Clerk announced that Lucille Harmon was present to speak during. the public hearing but had to leave; she left word that she was in support of the �. project and represented six other property owners . The City Administrator presented a staff report. Fire Chief Picard , presented a staff report from the fire protection and safety standpoint. Scott Hess , Senior planner, presented a staff report referring to photos and drawings. Kelly Main, Associate Planner, presented a staff report. She stated that the California Environmental Quality Act requires that to approve the project Where an Environmental Impact Report has been done avd significant impacts ` have been assessed that the City has to make one or more written findings for ' each of those significant effects . Ms . Main requested that the following information be made a part Jf the record : Corrections of the QrsIft. Supplemental Enyi rgnM1a al Impact aeoortt KQ.JL 88-1 and EnyirgnMgntal ImRact B30C' No, 55-1 for thg Praposg 5prj ngfi el d QJ 1 Recovery Projgct,--(In QnJmrErt on Wi-th- I&M Cba_nge Ng, 88-111 and Use Permit No. 88-25) to be included within Attachment 4: "Page 2 : Delete Section 4. Add the following paragraph to page 6, Section 1 .3; "(e) The Project will eliminate 22 existing wells and 7 tank batteries. None of the batteries. has more them rudimentary fire-fighting equipment , and the wells all have some leaks around the stuffin• boxes . Both the existing wells and tank batteries are located in close proximity to residences ; unlike the Project, they are root completely surrounded by block walls, with wells located underground in trench cellars . The Project' s design will ensure that oil leaks resulting from a major earthquake would not escape beyond the ton- tines of the Project, while existing wells and tank batteries create numerous risks of leakage and other potential hazards in the event of a major earth- quake, In addition, all existing wells are connected to their tank batteries by means of buried pipelines. Many of these lines are old, and their enact locations are not known. Approximately 18 ,E feet of pipeline will be aban- doned by the Project, which will replace the pipeline with pipelines that are in chnduits under the cc-ner of Springfield Avenge and Huntington Street or hung on the cellar walls , where leaks can be found and repaired quickly. This will result in a significant reduction in the impacts of ruptures and leaks in the eve _ )f a major earthquake. " Add the following underlined phrase to page Z'i , Section 2. 7 Traffic and Circulation (a) Entrances to *he site shall occur IA•;, r r4ge 14 - Counci ' gency Minutes - 11 /21 /88 only "an. IM UNAre Strait, ,,' Sarin field Avenue and California Street. Page 221 Sectiar 2.7.2, paragraph (c) sha?l be revised to read, "During . the pre-dri 11- Ing construction phase, truck routes as approved by the Department of Public Works and shown in the Circulation Element of the General Plan shall be ' used," On Page 30, Section 2 . 10, 3 add "(d) The Project will result in the ' abandormnt of approximately 18,000 feet of existing pi eline. Many of these lines are old, and their exact locations are unknown . the abandonment of this �ipolino will result in a significant reduction in the potential for pipeline oaks. " Ms . Main stated that a copy of the additional findings relating to Project Consistency with the Housing Element added to Section 2.5.2. of the CEQA Findings was submitted to Council prior to the meeting . The Mayor declared the hearing open . S=Cgr..-Sh€l dQa, Jo F 1 yqp , Roger Faia, Ke l ]y rri nkl , bon Gri swoLd, Ighn Crtar, MiChgy Shafe-r , Kathy wafer, Martha Brock, Clau.g Goedec,Le, repre- senting Huntington Beach Chamber of Commerce, presented a copy of a letter and position to the City Clerk, rdm Van IUMI , MAyje Ward, John Van, Houtgo, J= &]. wa 115,.E, U._ Schoe1d, David ,gatichy, eat S , Dennis Allen, Lean .F11e10 Ted Martel , JghnJ h, George Grattgn, Kevin Williams , Patricia , and Jobn . armi hael. spoke in support of this project. Donna K1 ei n, Boh„-Biddle , Pa nee l a_5tge 1 e, John MurdocI&, John .Wg.stermeJRJ: (He stated he submitted a letter . ) , Qui se de_ Vines., Pat Hg1l ander, Arnold &IyAta, k110411 Craig , dArk Rater, Wesley Abramson , fimC9e Cora, bAS Harkma QQnAld Phipps, Ed Martgi, Jghn Mosema►t, Ha__n_cy Koogler, Jodd Harm. �, Lynn Moseman, Richard ghram8.on spoke in opposition to this project. There being no one present to speak, further on the matter ,and there being no further protests filed , either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor. Mayor Erskine informed Council that he had communication with Concerned Citizens of Huntington Beach and had discussed the project with Mr . Sheldon . 'The City Clerk presented Resolution No. 5954 for Council Consideration - "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 88-1 (SEIR '88--1 ) AND ENVINMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 86-1 (EIR 86-1 ) FOR THE SPRINGFIELD OIL RECOVERY PROJECT LOCATED ON TWO BLOCKS ON OPPOSm CORNERS, SOUTHEAST AND NORTlINEST, AT THE INTERSECTION OF SPRINGFIELD AVENUE AND CALIFr-NIA STREET AND INCLUDING 150 ACRES OF SCATTERED WELL OPERATIONS BOUNDED GENERALLY BY FLORIDA STREET ON THE EAST AND SEVENTEENTH STREET ON THE NEST, BETWEEN YORKTOWN AVENUE ON THE NORTH AND MEliP1i I S AVENUE ON THE SOUTH. " A motion was made by Mays, seconded by Kelly, to adopt and certify as adequate Supplemental EIR #88-1 and adopt and recertify as adequate EIR #86-1 with Statement of Overriding Considerations by adopting Resolution No. 5954. The motion carried by the following roli call vote : AYES: Kelly, Green , Erskine , Mays , Bannister NOES: Finley, Winchell ASSENT: None IF e vy.v" i „r•r r Page 15 - Coun0lingency Minutes - M 21/88 The Cit Ciark prevented Ordinnnce No. 2980 for Council consideration - "AN d� THE CITY OF M-FING"TON BEACH ANENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH C, E BY AMENDING SECTION 9061 TO PRCyVICE FOR O NGE OF TUNING FRAM MOM $PECIFICw PLAO (DISTRICT TMD) WITH OIL SUFFIX TO OLD'I" SPECIFIC PUMM #( E $C T V) MITH OIL SUFFIX FOR DRILLING WNPOSES ON REAL PROPERTY LLY MUD BETWEEN DELWRE STREET TO THE EASE' WESTER AVENUE TD THE CJI�. MNIA STREET TO THE NEST, AND SPRINGFALD ,AVENUE TO THE NMTW, 0MGE NO. 6-10. A cation was made, by Mays , seconded by Kelly, to approve Zone Change 88-11 with findings as set forth 'on Attachment #1 of the RCA dated November 21 . 1980 and after reading by title, to approve the introduction of Ordinance No. 2980. Findings for ay&i Zone-_Change lo. _86-11 1 . A change of zone from "Oldtown Specific Plan, aistrirt Two-a" (011 Operations excluding Oil Drilling) to ''Oldtown Specific Plan, District Two -01 " (Oil Operations including Oil Dri l ling) will be compatible with surrounding residential uses based on the mitigation measures described in the environmental impact report and conditions of approval outlined in the use permit , i 2. The proposed zone change is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan. Unitization and consolidation. of existing oil operations is encouraged because it reduces the land' ar4Da used for oil facilities . Approximately 5 .3 acres of developable land will became avaiiable after the consolidation on the two blocks (3. 1 acres) . a. Section 9682 of Article 968 of the City's Zoning Code provides' for the establi3hment of 1101 " Districts . The only limitation for such an 01 aistric'. . is that of a minimum surface area (100 feet by 150 feet) , as required by Section qw. i . the proposed drill site for the project is considerably larger than the minimum . dimensions required by Section 9682 . 1 . Therefore, it is consistent with this provision. b. Section 9682 .2 requires dedication, or an irrevocable offer of dedi- cation , of all real property that the City may require for its streets and other public service facilities or improvements . All City-required dedications will be implemented through the terms of recorded tract maps for the project site. Therefore, the project is consistent with this provision. C . The project will remove ail producing facilities from six sites , thereby permitting the restoration of oil sines scattered over 160 acres . Although oil producing facilities will remain on the project site, the appearance of the project site wi 11 be improved over its present condition„ Therefore, the project is consistent with this policy, d. With respect to the land Use Element , policies have been translated into a Zonings and land Ilse Element Consistency Matrix. The matrix shows that as a rni scel laneous district -01 may be combined ( i .e. is consistent) with any land use category. It is specifically consis- tent with low, medium and medium-high density residential categories , T „ ,A�;�, .. *'iM►Mr r Pa" 16 Gounc Asency Minutes - 11 M ISS • e. A General Plan Amendment is not required because the combined ►; ,`{ acrsato of the proposed site is less than 20 ages as set forth in the Me Criteria for Determining Land Use Designations tabl cootkihsd in th• •General Plan. . lie►rrce with Title 8 ono Title 15 of the Nuntin ton1Ch Municipal end the use permit conditions ns f pp i ensure that the �} o a approval wl pr sld use allowed by the zone change will not be detrimental to the ,�:'.. • , . genera►1 health, welfare, and safety of the community. Tho aotion carried by the following roll call vote. AYES: Kei1 Green Erskine Mays, Bannister ROES: Finley, Winched ASSENT: y . ASSENT: None A motion was made by days , seconded by Kelly, to sustain the Planning Commission decisi,,%•;, to deny the appeal and to approve Use Permit 88-25 based on findings And conditions of approval and mitigation measures outlined in Attachment 01 to the RCA dated November 21 , 1988 with Modified Conditions 8b, Fi ndtags tgr. ft royaj ;.. Use Phi t .I g .25: I . The establ'ishment, maintenance and operation o,' the of l operation will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity, property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or bui ldin based on the conditions of approval and compliance with `Title 8 and Tit?e 16 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code. 2. Tha proposed oil operation is consistent with the goals &nd objectives of the General plan. Oil activities are a consistent use in any land use category of the General Plan, 3 . The project will consolidate oil operations in vile location reducing the visual impact of numerous wells now spread throughout the Springfield ail Field area . Such consolidatior) will also be advantageous for safety and noise reduction purposes . The project will result in the abandonment and ' reclamation of 31 existing wells and 16 oil storage tanks in the Spring- field Oil' Field area and wilt not significantly increase traffic in that area. 4. Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 88-1 and Environmental Impact Report No. 86•-1 have determined that any remaining significant effects on the environment fecund to be unavoidable are acceptable due to overriding considerations . 5, Conditions of approval for Use Permit No. 88-18 have eliminated or sub- stantially lessened all significant effects on the environment where feasible, 6. The profact will result in ihcreared tax revenues for the City of Huntington Beach and other governmental agencies . 4 R 4 n r� R • papa 17' - council . ency Minutes 11 !2i188 7, The, conditions of approval are desirable, and necessary in order to effec- tudte the, purposes of the Huntington Boarh Municipal Code, the official ' ` G06tral P14n Land Use Flan and the bes` i ntrreits of the City. Furthfr, they include mitigation measures sct forth in the final Environmental Impact Report that will assure thf, location is suitable for the type of use pro ;e,d and the, followi :ig will not result or be reasonably antic pa ed from the project: a. Domage or nuisance from noise, smoke, odor, ,dust or vibration; hazards from explosion , contamination or tire. b. Hazards occasioned by unusual volumes or character of traffic ; incompatibility with surrounding development. C. The project complies with all requirements of Division q except for the identified reduction of exterior sideyarO setback and other applicaale provisions of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code. S. The conditions imposed include requirements of pl aris for the disposition of oil wells and for oil operations on the property involved, and for berms , walls and landscaping to provide maximum feasible screening of equipment and facilities . 9. r changes have been required and incorporated in the project to mitigate or avoid the significant adverse environmental effects of the pro3ect: a. The Division of Oil and Gas enforces rules and regulations .for the conduct of secondary recovery operations . b, The mitigation measures incorporated, proposed and adopted, together with application of the rules and regulations of the Division of Oil and Gas , will substantially mitigate all of the adverse impacts identified. C . Public agencies other than the City, including the division of Oi ; and Gas , Regional Water Quality Control Board and South Coast Air Quality Management District , will be reviewing aspects of this project for mitigt.:;cn measures as to matters within their responsi- bility and jurisdiction , ._including subsurface operation , water and air quality; the critical need for oil renders infeasible the alter- natives of no project or delayed protect implementation, and alternative surface locations are infeasiole because of their limited aya i labi 1 i ty, or the greater disruption to the community at large which would result therefrom. 10. The subject lor.atlnn is centrally located within the Springfield ail Field area ; relocating the proposed project to another site is infeasible. 11 . No substantial public ;purpose would be served by denial of Use Permit No. 68-25 but rather: a. It is important that the United States develop its existing rail reserves in order to meet its energy needs without increasing depen- dence on foreign oil , and this project w; ll result in incremental recovery of approximately nine (9) million barrels of ail ; and n M I i 74 Page is - cound•' _)Genry minutes - 1112 1/40 h, The project will consolidate oil operations in one location, reduc- '� v1,#u4i impart of numerous wells nQi spread throughout the portion of the CI ty; and r tonsolidatibn will also be tdva► to eous for safiety and noise t r. _ � Y.,, w; r ► tiet purposes, and 0. The project will be only an interim use of the surface site ' ioy ,1u . and at the termination of the project the site will be avi lsb p for recycling into oths' r uses; and e. The pro)ect wi i 1 benefit and accrue to the general welfare of the f City and the public for each of the reasons set forth above. f. Approval of this project will reduce the immediate derdand for more uff-shore drilling facilities . 12. ' The proposed oil consolidation project will have 24 hour on-site per- r' sonnal , and wi.l 1 be safer than the existing non-continuous monitoring of the 31 scattered wells to be abandoned throughout the area. This will reduce the possible attraction of younger persons . 13. The most modern , efficient energy-saving equipment available will be integrated into the design of the project which will mitigate envi ron- menta; impacts such as fire, noise and air pollutants . r 14. The applicant has submitted a propertyY value protection plan which will be implemented as outlined prior to drll.ling. 15. The reduction of the exterior sideyard setbacks from ten (10) to seven (7) feet is based on the following: A. The reduction of exterior sideyard setback for perimeter wall. from ten (10) to seven (7) feet will result in improved design and utility of the project. b. The design of • the perimeter wall will be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood . c . The proposed perimeter wall with reduced exterior sideyard setbacks will not have a detrimental effect on the general health, safety$ welfare or setback privacy of surrounding residents . d . - Variation in the wall setback is provided through the use of offset landscape pockets , architectural features and building materials . of_Aooroval -. Jse EURit U. al-25: 1 . The site plan, elevations and landscape plan dated received October 13, !988, shall be the conceptually approved layout . a . This use permit shalt rot become effective until Zone Change No. 88-11 has been approved and in effect. Z, All ,structu;•es and procedures shall conform to Title 15 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code and the Division of Oil and Gas Standards . �a � M ptge 10 - Council )ency Minutes - 11 /21/88 3. The applic., .it shall obtain all necessary electrical and building permits. 4. Noise monitoring shall be conducted under the supervision of a►n acous- tic&) engineer certifted by the County of Orange. Reports shall be sub- mi t{4d to the Director of Community Development within three working days arter th* completion of each phase of the monitoring effect. The monitoring shall include the following: a. Pam-; f, l i tng gh&AA_ ygni,to., ri nu, Prior to the start of the dri i l i n99 phase, noise measurements shall be obtained during the operation of the specific drilling rig which has been selected and the measure- ments shall be related to those which will be experiencad at the nearest residential boundaries to the drilling site. In addition, the noise control measures have been (or will be) applied to the rig as needed for compliance with the City of Hunti Heaton Beach Noise Ordinance shall be identified. ,i b . $tad of ,0011 jag. Noise measurements shall be obtained during the nighttime fours (10:00 PM to 7:00 AM) for at least six hours on each of three' nights within the five day period From the start of the drilling phase . Monitoring is to occur at the nearest residential boundary to the actual drilling operation. The noise level data shall be compared to those specified in the City of Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance by the Department of Community Development. Where an exceedance of the ordinance is identifieds noise control measures shall be applied and an a additional two nights of monitoring shall be required. C . Wrir thee-QrUlIna ,phase. Noise monitoring shall occur during a six-hour period between the hours from 10:00 PM to 7:00 AM at least once each month during the drilling phase of the nro3tct. The noise level data obtained shall be compared to the City of Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance standards by the Department of Crxuntty a Developmant. Where an exceadance of the standards is identifiedo noise control measures shall be applied and 'an additional two nights of monitoring shall be required . S. measures to reduce erosion should be used during grading and site prepar. ation. Grading and construction activity shall take place only during daylight hours after the issuance of a grading permit by the ,.Depatrtnrw of Public Works . 6. During grading and excavation, earthmoving crews should observe cuts and spoils for potential archaeological, finds . In the event* of a potentiai find being located, opera.+ions shall be suspended until the significance of the find is determined. ". .A, dust control program shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits . S. All street improvements for both tracts shall be constructed .ofter the haayy aradino operations have been completed (approxiimately 4 VMS) : 44 I F " pager 20 - Counc i i/, ,bncy Minutes - 11121/88 . ' 4, final grading or any other on--site construction shall be prohibited until street improvement construction his coarnenced. b. Prior to any on-site. construction or d'I ; iy► in the masonry Wall and all landscaping and street improvemen, �f�11 be instailed subject to the approval of Department of ' Woemunity Devel opwnt and ' Departnnt of Public works. However, construction of value boxes may begin after street improvement construction has commenced. 9. Prior to the installation of any landscaping, a landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development and Public Works for review and • approval . a . All landscaping shall comply with Chapter 15 .22 of thv Huntington Beach Ordinance Code and all trees shall be. minimum 24 inch box type and spaced no greater than 20 feet on center. q., 10. Prior to the installation of the office structure, elevations shall be provided ' for review and approval by the 0epairtment of Community Development. r, a a. The office shall be on a permanent foundation. b. A mknsard or pitched roof shall be provided. YY. I t 11 . The � applicant shal l enter into a franchise agreement with th,9 City torM ' the installation of the underground connection between the two hiocks , it I required. 12. The proper. seal ,* and abandpnment of the existing scattered wells rani dh < will be replaced by this project shall take place following approval of this project and must be completed within eighteen ( 18) months . 13. The surface of the site shall be completely covered with an appropriate material ( such as gravel and/or asphalt) subjoct to review and approval of Public hrorks Department, Fire Department and Department of Community Development. 1d. • A report prepared by art acoustical ' engineer certified by. the County of Orange shall be submitted to the Department of Community. Development for review and approval prior to commencing drilling. 5a.id report shall describe noise- levels at the Angus Oil Site property line and at the nearest residential property line both with and without an acoustical blanket on the drilling . rig and service rigs . The report shall indicate noise attenuation measures necessary to ensure compliance with the Huntington Beach Noise Code. This shall include the provisions of the Ordinance Code regarding maximum hourly average noise level at nearest residential property line of 50 MA) during nighttime hours between 10;00 PN and :00 AM. a. A double acoustical blanket enclosure shall be provided at man-door entrances . M Noise attenuation for the drM ing operation, 01 operation and service i operation sha 1.1 be provided pursuant to the Oil 1. "'ode and not a report specified in Condition 14. 194 i W Mob JA 9 Page 21 Counci lgency Minutes 11 /21/88 a. If a noise violation occurs , t i,2 entire drilling structure shall be wrapped with an acoustical blanket for greater noise attenuation. 16. No speakers , loud bells or buzzers shall be employed on site. 17. Excessive vibration, as determined by the Department of: Community Development, shall be reduced to acceptable levels . 18, tight and glare shell be directed and/or screened to prevent "spillarc" onto Wicent residential properties and shall be energy efficient sub- sect to the requirements of the Building Division . 19. During the pro-drilling construction phase, all heavy truck traffic shall be limited to the use of designated truck routes as approvm.d by the Ueparta►ent of Ptibl i c Works and in accord with the Circulation Element of the General Plan. All heavy truck traf fi c during the drilling and the operational phase cif the project shall be limited to the following streets betaoen the 40S freeway and the subject site: Beach Boulevard , Adams {`.venue , and Delaware- Street . For entrance to the site only Spring- field Avenue and California Street may be used. 20. Heavy truck traffic shall be limiters to the hours between 7 :00 AM and a :pd PM. a . No trucks may park on the street, b. Truck deliveries shall be staggered so that no stacking shall occur can public streets . 21 . All employees must park on either oiie of the two sites . Street parking for employees is p-,oh1bited. 22. Local streets affected by truck traffic shall be inspected before and after construction . Any damage to local streets by heavy trucks shall be repaired and reconstructed - per City requirements at the expense of the applicant . 23. All driveways shall be radius type and constructed to Public Works j standards. _ f I 2e . - There shall be no entrance or exit of vehicles from the dri111ng site between the hour-i of 10:00 PM and 7 :0n AN except for emergency purposes. 28. An overlond permit should be obt&ined frog City and State ( if required) for Ail oversized loads to be moved on public streets. 2n. Pipes-:'string cementing thro►mh fresh water bearing sands shall be impl e- Nontod to prevent salt water intrusion into the aquifers. 27. A system for collecting, treating, and releasing storm drainage shall be provided by- the applicant and approved by Public Works . 28. Brine water shall not be :-I-o 4ased into the sewer system. n if i i! r.r Page 22 - Councils ,ency Minutes .- lli21/86 fig. A recycling plan of produZen zone water back to the oil reservoir shall be certified by the Department of Cif and Gas and the Fire Department and all its conditions and restrictizns shall be adhered to. 33. He 1 service rigs shal i be operated no- more than a total of 48 days per year between 7 :00 AM and 7:00 FM or daylight hours , whichever is shorter. 31 . No more than four wzll service rigs may be on the premises at any one time. The service -rigs shall not exceed )20 feet in height and shall be = „ double Wiffled and utilize acoustical blankets as deemed necessary. 32. Ali drilling r1js and production wells shall be operated by electrical r motors and electric pumps only. 33 . The 24- hour phase drilling rigs shall not operate for any longer than 2 years from the issuance of the first dri 11 ing permit . 34 , Drilling rigs for remaining wells after the two year period shall comply' with the conditions . Subsequent drilling shall be 1imitea to 7 :00 AM to 10 :00 PM only. :35 . Drilling derricks' shall not exceed 165 feet • 1n overall height. i 36 . Upon completion of 24 hours phase of injection and producer wells , all drilling rigs shall be removed from the site. 37 . Upor, completion of all drilling operations, the drilling structure shall .. bt. removed From the site. ` 38 . Applicant shall inst-0 1 blowout prevention equipment . 39. A full vapor recovery system shall be installed as required by the South Coast Air Quality Managemomt District. 40. Only three on-site crude oil tanks are permitted and shall never be completely full at once. '41 , Prepare and submit a Preliminary. Emergency Action Plan (EAP) prior to issuance of building permits . A completed Emdrgency Action Plan based on as-built plans shall be completed and submitted prior to the start of oil production operations . The Emergency Action Plarn shalt include employee trashing and .periodic practice, hoer spillage unto street From site( s) would be handled (stockpile of sand, etc. ) , the safe handling of any chemicals and/or materials , and full knowledge of all systems and emer- gency equipment. A copy shall be on file with the Fire Department and updated on a five year basis . In addition, a Spill prevention awd ` Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan in Compliance with City require meats for handling of spills , etc. , not otherwise Coverid in the Emer- gency ,Action Flan shall be completed and filed with the City prior -to the start of oil production operations . 42. All oil must be transported by pipeline . 43. An on--site fire suppres0on system shall be installed as a primary source for fire protection pursuant to Fire Department requirements . •1 , J ii,�y%y, . ,• 1 y "1 •6A � �'7f M`L •,Y pw x3 - CewnC i l/, ,NCY V nutds 11 /21 /$b y . Collor rogv'.3ments for oil wells: a. A h� drogan sulfide detection system for the well ceilers shall be installed sub3ect to Fire Department requir,4ments. b . Fire extinguishers approved by the Fire Department rust be installed within 75 feet of "ravel on-site. N. f, c . Provide metal open grate rovers over tap of well rel 1 ers . ;45 Storage tank requirements : ..eeII 44 Must have pre-plumbed form Injection 'system installed on• all product storage tanks . ;A b. Must have exterior deluge water spray system on all storage tanks . 46. Site requirements : $ . All diked areas must have an engineered d;•ainage system, b. Foam stc 'age area and foam quantit, to be approved by Fire Department. ' . c . Fitt hydrants to be located in areas. approved by Fire Department. d. Hydrogen sulfide detection system approved by Fire Department to be installed on project perimeter . e . Fire extinguishers approved by the Fire Department must be installed throughout the site. ;. • f. All gate openings must be 24 feet in width and installation must comply with Fire Department Specification '403. �47. 4e"II cellars shall be maintained ir, a clean and efficient manner to prevent waste accumuianion. 4i 4 Twenty-ono (21) abandoned Vol l s have . been i dentl fI ad wi thi n the project are$ which do hot moot present- day abandonment requirements . A contip- gency plan shall be outl in'O and submitted to the Huntlrgton Beach - Fire Department, for ro.view and approval with steps to be taken in the event r, `• ,' t 1roLage from any of thtse abandoned walls fVodx its way to the Prjor to tarminatitin of the oil operation, a plan shall be #u ttod WOWto review and a er a� of the Fire Depart twht and �:o rn i ty U,velopmat 04partomt, showing, h ow the sit* shall be abandoned 'anal ' restored to its closest natural state. SO. There shall be no pipeline construction activity outside the site Wept r between the hours of 7:00 AM and 8:00 pN, Monday through Saturday only. 51 . the mutthodology of oil recovery for this orojecr sha11 be limited' to water injection only. Steam injection shall be prohibited. r 14 p e Mob s ti• ��r 'i r Page 24 - Ccwnci1/ •ancy Minutes 11 /21/68 , 62. The operator 0a11 at all times during the term of this use permit and any renewal or extension thereof, maintain :n force an insurance policy or policies insuring the operator, and as additional insureds the City of Huntington Beach , the City Council and each member thereof, and every officer and employee of the City acting in the due course of his employ- ment or in his official capacity, against liability or financial loss resulting from any suits , claims or actions brought by any person or persons, and from all costs and expenses of litigation brought against the insureds , In the amount of not less their $5 ,000,000 combined •si ngla limit for any injury to persons or damage to property, including (but not limited to) injury or uamage from subsidence and rebound, ;esulLing from the operator' s oil drilling and production activities any operations incidental thereto. Saio policies shall provide that the insurance coverage shall not be cancelled or reduced by the insurance carrier without the City having been given at least ten days prior written notice thereof by such carrier. The operator shall not cancel or reduce said insurance coverage . At all timos during the term of this use permit , and any renewal or extension thereof, the operator shall maintain on file with the City Clerk a certificate or certificates of insurance issued by the carrier or carriers showing that said insurance is in effect in the amount required above , and a copy of each insurance policy. If the operator does not keep said insurainca in full force and effect , the City may obtain said insurance and pay the premium thereon, which shall then be deemed a debt owned , by the operator to the City. Any insurance poli- cies procured by the operator hereunder shall provide that the insurance carrier waives all rights of subrogation against the City. . If the City obtains any policy of insurance hereunder, such policy , shall include a waiver by the insurance carrier of all rights of subrogation against the operator , 63. The Planning Commission shall review and, 1f necessary, may modify .the f conditions as set forth in this use permit, at thu first regular P1aoning Commission meet`ng in October, 1909, and at five year intervals KA after, and upon any change in ownership of the project which occurs between five-year reviews ; provided that the phrasj "change of ownership" as used herein shall not include any • sale or other transfer to a corpor- `ti Won, partnership or other form of business organizatid.z in which y , ,..,• . Alberta Hatural Gas-United States and/or one or more of i is shareholder or subsidiaries owns the controlling interests , or- any sale or transfer so long as Angus or one of it-s subsidiaries retains responsibility for the operation of the project. $4. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke this use permit if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs , The City shall provide the property owner with notice in writinn . ;' stating the City's basis for determining that a viola- af� any -viol action, _..,• � tlon has occurred. The praperty owner shall have a realsonabl a time to 6fre the. violation before further action is taken . The City may require 9 ' the property owner with, notice In writing -to subr;i t written documentation of dctlons taken to remedy any violationn and may require monitoring or other procedures to be implemented in order to ensure that the violation will be cured. 55. Th• nine member project review committee shall monitor the projoct during tho drilling phase and semi--annually thereafter, The Fire Department ,and r Coewwnity Development departments shall ,jointly provide a staff liaison, ' .ISM r • P#ge 20 - Council . )envy Minutes - 11121JOB 36, the property va Iue protection plan submitted by the applicant shad be Implemented as outiined prior to drilling. 57. In the event that either one of the two blocks is to be without 24-hour z supervision, a video camera shall be employed on-site to provide contin- uous surveillance which can be monitored by personnel %t the other site. SO. All mitigation measures given in DSEt.p_ 88-1 and Elk 66-1 shall be Included as conditions of•approval . . 59. Emergency discharga through the City' s storm drain shall be approved by the Regional Water Quality Control Board. 60. If during the 24 hour drilling phase, the number or nature of complaints is such as to prevent code enforcement staff from handling their normal workload, the City Administrator may assign a City employee to act as Spein field Project Ombudsmen. If necessary, said Ombudsman shall coordinante project inspections , assure Use permit compliance, assi3t in J Problem resolution and citizen communications. Upon p presentation of an appropriate invoice, the applicant shall reimburse the City for the time ' spent by the Ombudsman on such activities . Such cost shall be calculated et the direct hourly cost of such employee at his or her scheduled salary rate without regard to indirect or retirement benefits. The charges for such Ombudsman services shall not include any charges for other City inspectors or code enforcement employees whose services are intended to be covered by payment. of various permit fees. f The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Kelly, Green, Erskine, Mays , Bannister } 1S- Finley, Minchell ABSENT: idone 'i l ) I�RING M0�"!OM yERRULE- PC BALM M AWNING ®M BEACH Thee Mayot onounced that, this was the day and hour set for a public hearing to 'N cdosider the following: f c APpea1 of ,Planning Commission's Approval of Conditional Use Permit 40 . Benco ' Beach. Ltd 4201 Long Beach Blvd. #403, 'Long Beach, • JaCk GriAes, . President, and 3eff Siegfried, Vief-president , on Wall?of seawind Cove Homeowners Association Lficat jpp: 19092 Beach• Boul evard, Sui tea J, K, L, and M of P1 aya do 1 a P1 aza rater (east side of Beach Boulevard approximately 247 feat south of Garfield weAW�. EaMiW: Appeal of Planning Coimri ssion 's approval of a request to permit the operation of a 4,960 square toot family billiard ( 14 pool tables) and game arcade center; which includes a food snack bar. ' r 1 s r •,, r r pag• 26 Council � �ency Minutts - 11/21 /88 fAIJEQWntal, Statul: Categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15301 , Class r is o, the California Environmental Quality Act, The City Clerk announced that she had reviewed a communication from Debby Huffman, representing several Huntington Crest residents opposing the project-..: : h and requesting a conti_ivance of the public hearing and a communication from Jerr me, attorney, representing applicant stating his opposition to 4 ;s cont npance of this public hearing. Scott Ness, Senior Planner, presented a staff report. . ` The Way& declared the hearing open . ! rrr�► attorney represennting 'the applicant, spoke in opposition of a y" con0nubnce of this publ i c (hearing, wf..sitafria !la ..t"we , Susan cQuots , Iom Yon hit, JuL_.SLCIm, As &ie. nU spoke in .apposition to this project. Jirr rBA, Robert. _F �0 Bennett aul . imong S91 RA=nd .�.�....� PRoberts,,, S i mom e e 7�i�s_.a�„�+,or SgheAj , and Craig Stewj&rd spoke in support of this project. There being no one present to ,peak further on the matter and there being no further protests filed, either oral oi• written, the hearing was closed by the Kayo. Following discussion , a ,motion was made by Mays , seconded by Green, to over- rule the Planning Commission' s approval of Conditional llso Permit 88-40. the 1 � • • motion fai l ad by the following roll call tie vote AYES: Green, Mays, Winchell f NOBS: Kelly, Finley, Erskine ASSENT! Bannister tout of the roomy :. The City Attorney stated the Planning Commission' s decision to approve "r Condi t,lonal Use Permit 88-40 prevailed. a. (7 .. ;.y HIi .- tlR. .7Q 1 /5/88 W CAE AMENIT .. . T� XOMM, IFIC, PLhA T� � n!eyror annouhced that this was the day and hour set fora tiblic hearingto e, ;consider Cod# Amendment No. 88-3A, accepting the modified language as approved *y. fis' California Coastal Comission, by adopting. Resolution Na. 59Sb and ;d1, p No. 2281 . �•, : " r The Ci .. r I + t. ty Cl erk ennpuncrd that all legal regui remand for notification, publ i-r r, gatipn, AW posting, had been meta and that she had received ho comuni cati ons Or written protests to the' utter. the Mayor ddt larerf the heart ng open. On motion by Kelly, second Erskine, Council voted unanimously to continue the open public hearing to December 5, 1988 to cons i dr r Code Amendment No. 88-3A, Resolution No. 5g58 and Ordinance No. 2981 pertaining to modification of language as approved by the California Coastal C lssion. J r, mob* F Pap 28 Counc i 1/A,, ,icy Minutes - 11 J 21 i86 2041K RM MILM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO I.AT SPECIFIC PLAN SECTION 'A' . ON REAL PROPERTY GENERALLY !LOCATED C* EIGHT ACRES BLTNELN G OWENWEST STREET, PALM AVENUE, TWENTY-SECOND STREET AND WALNUT' AVENUE (ZONE CHN GE 8$-14). " On motion by Kelly, second Erskine , Council unanimously deferred consideration of Ordinance No. 2971 to December S. 1988, . URFERSED..M.)WIN - RESIDENTIAL,pARKI,f„Pg#Ml ' The City Clerk presented Ordinance No. 2977 for Coloncil consideration - "AN ORDINMCE OF THE CITY OF HU1dTINGTON BEACH AMENDING SECTION 10.42.030 4F THE NIA1>"TiIM BEACH MUNICIPAL 000E RELATING TO RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMIT." On motion by Kelly, second Erskine, Council unanimously deferred consideration of Ordinance No. 2977 to December 5, 1988. FINANCE NO 297r - QEFER ER D To 126168 - SPECIFIC Ei LNIS APPLICAM AND The City Clerk presented Ordinance No. 2978 for Council consideration - "AN ORDINWE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING SECTIONS 5.68.040, 5.68.090# 6.68. 170 PERTAINING TO SPECIFIC EVENTS APPLICATIOW AND PERMIT. " On lotion by Kelly, second Erskine, Council unanimously deferred consideration c. inance -No. 2978 to December 5, 1988. 0MViijAGgla 1lMRIMENT The Mayor/Chairman adjourned the regular meeting of the City Council and the regular :meeting of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Seath to r 6 p.m. , Detsmber 5, 19880 in Room B-8 of the Civic Center Complex. The City Clerk/Cl of adjourned the rp�guler meeting of the City Council/kede- +� oaet ptat Agency o the City of Huntington Beach. Conni a grdebAv Clerk of the Redevologivint Agon y y and 'City Clerk and ex icloCie; of the Ci ty Coun�ci 1 of the Ci ty of Huntington Beach. California ATTEST: Conle 8rocksayc_.. - BMW BY: City Clerk/Clerk City Clerk/Clark • -. • i 0lw4AAC340? City Clerk/Clark ayor/Chairman -� - F. 1 1•✓i' ' y'i'• 1 a 'YTA" r �{ . , •al WITM } Paso )3 - Council/A�"*Iey Minutes - 12/5/88 � S"INGP'TELD OIL RE0011 RY PBQ= 1�M��1ll� The City Clerk presented Ordinance No. 2980 for Council consideration W "AM pRDINAINCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTIN+.TON BEACH tDIN NOE COCE BY AMENDING SEVION 9061 TO PROVIDE FOR CHANGE OF ZONING FROM OLOTONN SPECIFIC PLAN (DISTRICT TWO) WITH OIL SUFFIX TO OLDTONN SPECIFIC PLAN (DISTRICT TWO) WITH OIL SUFFIX FOR DRILLING PURPOSES ON REAL PROPERTY GENER— ALLY LOCATED BETWEEN DELAWARE STREET TO THE EAST. ROCHESTER AVENUE TO THE SWTH, CALIFORNIA STREET TO THE WEST, AND SPRINGFIELD AVENUE TO THE NORTH, ;,1 (BONE CHANGE NO 88-11 ) . " (Springfield 011„Recovery Project - Angus 011) 00 motion by Erskin'l3, second Green, Council adopted Ordinance No. 2980, after reading by title , by the fol 1 owi n�;, roll call vats: KIES: MacAllister , Green , Winchell , Bannister, Mays , Silva, Erskine NOES: WinChell ABSENT: None PLANNING C01►IMISSICNER RESIGNATION ACCEPTED ,AIM SI.LYA A motion was made b Bannister, seconded by Mays ,y to accept the resignation of Jim Silva from the Planning Commission , The motion tarried by the following roll call vote: ,. d AYES: MacAllister , Green, Winchell , Bannister, Mays , Erskine NOES: done f ABSTAIN : Silva ABSENT, None UANNING_CMISSI0,NER ,PINTMIEnT - ARP-ROVEQ - QARRY WILLIAMS On .motion by Bannister. second MacAllister, Council /Agency unanimously rati- fied the appointment to the Planning Commission of Barry Williams. i jQ THE I ' On � Otion by Erskine , second , Mays , Council /Agency unanimously approved author- izatibn for the Mayor to `send a letter to the League of California Cities recommending the appointment of Councilman MacAllister to the Resolutions Coma ttee. D7 SSQL= Following discussion , Mayor Bannister dissolved the Mayor' s Committee, i ' r P40e 15 -- Counci l/E Cy minutes 12/B/6.0 PIERSIUE PHASE ILl Jim Silva Don MacAllister Grace Hinchell John Erskine The notion carried by the following roll call vote: t AYES : MacAllister, Green , Hinchell , Bannister, Mayi , Silva►, ,ErsKine HOES : None ABSENT: None �.,;. Way►ar Bannister stated that appointments to the ad hot Management Growth ►; : Comittee would be mach bV Jim Silva , don MacAllibter , and Wes Bannister . CNICIIAEUDER LYAYS -TO BE ITEM H ON THE AGENDA Mayor Bannister requested courcilmembers to present reports regarding Council /Agency liaison to boards , Commissions and committees ender Item B on future agendas. The Mayor/Chairman adjourned the regular City Counci ! meeting of the City of Huntington Beach at 11 : 10 p.m. to 9 a.m. , Saturday, December 17, 198e at the Settliff Country Club , 6501 Palm Avenue , Huntington Beach . . Conn i g @ro kg.Y Clerk of the Redevelopment Agency and City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Counci 1 of the City of Huntington Beach , California #T.E$T: erroo ckXjy Ci ty Clerk/Clerk Deputy City Clerk/Deputy Clerk 400ty ,City Clerk/Deputy Clerk Mayor/Chairman ^,iy ar='• �rl'. ,P,,. c'I' 1h;',-' T . 4 CR '' t x, `` M1 u r s yJ r VOW ��Y1/W4��' J1:�IM11Ji:.1,. :i :nS::�iiuUYNYobJKMfIM1fI11MMNMM ' �M�Nri111�1111i41iJpw ip�:�tiii aJJ�JiJ il{Ji7./1M rI11DINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR Z0X3 CN AMM 30. 88-1 AND USE PEMIT NO. 88-25 AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMISSION ON OCTOBER 18 1988 1 . A Change .of Bona from "0ldtown Specific Plan, District Two-a" (oil OpLiAtions excluding Oil Drilling) to "Oldtown Specific Plan, District Tmo-01" (Oil Operations including Oil Drilling) will be compatible with surrounding residential uses basest on the mitigation measures described in the environmental impact report and conditions of approval outlined in the use permit . 2 . The proposed Bone change is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan. Unitisation and consolidation of existing oil operations is encouraged because it reduces the land area used for oil facilities . Approximately 5.3 acres of developable land will become available after the consolidation on the two blocks (3 . 1 acres) . a. Section 9682 of Article 066 of the City' s Zoning Cade provides for the establishment of "01" Districts . , Tha only limitation for such an 01 District is that of a minimum surface area ( 100 foot by 150 feet) , as required by Section 9682. 1. The proposed drill site for the project is ' considerably larger than the minimm dimensions required by Section 9682 . 1. Therefore, it is consistent with this y provision. yA bJ; Suction 9602.2 requires dedication, or an irrevocable offer of dedication, of all real property that the C:ity may r6quire for its streets and other public service facilities or imprbvem ants. All City-required dedications w,* Il be implemented through the terow of recorded tract maps for tho project rite. Therefore, the project is consistent ,r.. with this ptoviseion The project will remve -oil producing feeili.ties from six sitars, thereby permitting the restoration of oil ?itos � sea ikeied .ovor 160 acres. Although oil producing tacilitler will remain on the project site, the appearance pf the project -site will be improved over its present Jonditiou. Therefore, the project is consistent with this 4. With respect to the Land Use Element, policies have been translated into a zoning and Land Use Element Consistency Matrix. The matrix shows that as a miscellaneous district -.01, a►sy be combined (i . a. is consistent) with any land use categorryy, It is sperificelly consistent with low, me:lium and mediumhigh density reel:deentiol categories. r 7, • 9. A General Plan Amendment is not required because the combined acreage of the propogod site is less than 20 acres as set forth in the Sire Criteria for Determining Land Use Derignations table contained in the General Plan . 3 . 1lase with Title 8 andTitle l� ofthe Huntington Beach e aipal Cone dad they use permit conditions of approval will 0"U re that the proposed use allowed bythe saris change will t be detrimental to the general health, welfare, and safety o the ccityr. 1. The establishment, msintenance and opeerati4a of the oil operation will not be detrimental, to the general welfare of persons residing or wyoarking in the vicinity, property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building based on the conditions of approval and compliance with Title 8 and Title 15 of the Huntington beach Municipal Code. � g. The proposed oil operation is consistent with the goals and objectives of tho General plan. Oil activities are a consistent use in any land use category of the General plan. 1. The project will consolidate ail operationm in on* location reducing the visual impact• of numerous welic now spread througW%ut the Spriagfield, Oii Field area . Such consolidation will also be advantageous nor safety and noise reduction purposes . The project will result in the abandonment and reeol caution 'of 31 existing wells and 16 oily storages tanks in the Springfield Oil • Fiald area and will not significantly increase traffic ih that area.. 4 . Sg ,• lematal Environmental lampact Report No. 86-1 and HAVr Vat aental impact Report No. 86-1 have determined that any relikialAq significant effects on the environment found to be uritVoidable are acceptable duce to overriding considerations . 8 . Coaditions of approval for use Permit No. 88--38 have eliminated or, subatontiu l l.y lessened all significant effects on tho invitonment where feasible. Is The project Trill result in inaressel tax ;revenues for the City of ''Huntington beach and other governme►ntil agencies. r. ?, The conditions of 'approval are desirable and necessary in nrder to e►ffedtuate the purposes of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code, the official General Plan Land Use Plan and the beat interoots of the City. Further; they include mitigation measures set forth in the final Environmental Impact keport that will assure the location is suitable for the type of use Proposed and the following will not result or :)a reasonably anticipated from the projects ( 1613d ) 4 •" sow i .r y, " 41Jr7•yrhlh� w w i. Damage or nuisance from noiso# smoke, odor, dust or vibration; hazards from asplosion, contamination or fire. b. 1laxords occasioned by unusual -volumes or character of traffics incompatibility with surrounding develnpt+eent. Thg pte ect amplios with all requirements of Di.vit.,. .,n 9 as bt or the identified re%luction of exterior ai.deyarO botbi6ek and other applicable provisions of the Huntington beach Iminicipal code. 0, % 6 . The conditions imposed include requirements of plans for the ,. disposition of oil wells and for oil -operations on the property involved, and for berms, walls and landscaping to provide swvimum feasible screening of equipment and facilities . g, Mangos have been required and incorporated in the project to mitigate or avoid, the significant adverse environmental effects of the project: a. The Division of Oil and Gas enforces rules and regulations a foe the conduct of secondary recovery operations . { i ^ � b. The mitigation measures incorporated, proposed and adopted, together with application of the ru'loa and regulations of the Division of Oil and Gas , +sill substartialiy mitigate all of the adverse Impscts identified . c. Public agencies other than the City, including the Division of Oil Ann Gas, Regional Water Quality Control board and Soutb Cast Air Quality Management District, will be cowl ming aspects of this project: for mitigation measures to to matters within their r4sponsibility and jurisdiction, ' lading subsurface operation# water and air quality: the ati{tical need for oil rendeats infeasible the alternatives of no project or delorW project implementation, and alternative surface ioestions are infeasible because of their limited availability, or the greater disruption to tho 'community at large which would rasult therefrom. 1p. The N' ubj"t location it centrally located within the 89risk9tiold Oil Field areas relocating the proposed project to soother site is infeasible. 11 . Ho substantial public purpose would be served by denial of Use Permit P o . 88-;&5 b:tt rather: a. It is important that the United States develop its oristing oil reserves in order to swet its energy needs without; increasing dependence on foreign oil, and this project will result in incremental recovery of approximately nine (9) mullion barrels of oil; and (1613d) 'sf Y y +y ' Y y AIL WWI Ar r -25 + 1 . IU site plan, elevations and landscape plan dated received October A . 196d, $hall be the Coneeptuall,f approved layout, a. Tbiv use permit shall n9t becom effective until Sons Change Xo, 88-11 has been approved and in effect . 3 . All at*uatuare* and Procedures shall conform to Title 15 of the r:tington beech Nuakipal Code and the Division of Qil and Gas Standards . 3 . The applicant shall obtain all necassarir elect.Tica►l and building permits . e . Spise monitorinv shall be conducted under the super tision of an ammstical engineer certified by the County of Orange, Reports shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development within three working days after the completion of each phase of the Monitoring effect. rho monitoring shall include the Co 1 loari ng M. - . . 'prior to the start of the drIllfhg phase, noise aneasurttoo its shall be obtained during the ops*tatioa of the specifid drilling rig which hma been selected and the measurements shall be related to those which will be experienced at the nearest residential boundaries to the drilling site . in addition, the noise dontrol �aaa�surea have been (or will be) applied to the rig of needed for compliance with the city of Huntington Beach 861,90 ordinance shall be i,dent3 pied. b.. RU311M. Boise measurements shall be obtained rin0. the nighttime hours, ( "0 :00 PM to 7:00 AN) for at least 4,j'i hours on each cU three nights `41tbin the f ive fty Period from the start of the drilling phase. Monitoring fa to omur at the nearest residential boundary to the acted 14M noise ISV61; data shall be compared .to those specified the City, ;plf Y ju�tington Beach tlaxse ordi pa,nce by the s ftrsent oi° cdmwal ty t ;--91opment Whetei ikn exceedanria 6i the otdinsuce is Jdantitied, noiss control measures arpXit' and an additional two nights of monftor�.r1q shall be required. Noise mo::ltoring .t ha.71 occur . 0ri a iliac'-hour period between the hours from 10 : 00 FN to rig 7160 AN at leant once ,Bach month du ring ' the dLilling phase „ ., pf t,he,i project. The noise level data obtained rhall be CtsAtpar�9d to the City of Huntington Bosch Eloise ordinance standaade by the Dope: unent of community Development . Where an of the ecnndArds in identified, noise control Meae::._r$s shall be applied and an additional two Knights of monitoring shall be required. (ldl�ly f r i �!$p'.,t, r,to',tMFHObMki7yNMWiklittr. liill4"M.�MIrN1MrMYYY�1lY . , •,•.,.. , :,tu; ,,,iU. nn +, ,.., ,•,r , , ,. , ,,.. •,.,•.,. ,, , 5 . Mleasure,+ to reduce orosion Should be uscid dur:J rich k. rai.ing and si ;.e preparation. Grading and cons tr.uct.ion shall take place only during daylight hours after the insuanir a of a grading permit by the Department oil Public Works . 6 . During groding and excavation, eart:hmoving crews should observe. cuts and spoils for potential archaeological finds . In the event of a potential find being located , cpurati.ons shall be suspended until the s ig.iif iclavic.e of th_e find is determined . 7 . A dust control program shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits . S . All street improvements for both tracts shall be constructed after the zy g operations have been completed (approximately 4 weeks) : a . Fir.ai grading, or any )other on.-site const:. action shall be prohibited until street improvement construction has commenced. b. Prior to any on-site construction or drilling, the masonry wall and all landscaping and street improvements shall be installed subject to the approval of Department of Community Development and Department of Public Wnr.ka . 9 . Prior to the installation of any landscaping, a landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to the Department of Comnunity Development and Puhlic Works for review and nppr•oval . a . All landscaping shall. comply with Chapter 15 . 22 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Cade and all trees shah be minimum 24 inch box type and spaced no greater than 42.0 feet on center + la. prior to the Installation of the office structure, elevations shall be provided for review and approval, by the Department of Cotamunity Development . 0. The office shall be on a permanent foundation . b. A mansard or pitched) roof shall be provided . kl. Tho appltcatst shall enter, into a franchise agreement with the City for the it,stallation of the underground connection between the two blocks, if required . 12. IM, prdper sdelihg and abandonment of the existing scattered llq which will be reel p'ced by this project sha i 1 take place 611o4igiq approval of this project and must be completed voithin glYti�rit (18) months . (1513d) ...ram AA. .i 1 13 , The surface of the site shall be completely covered wirn an appropriate material ( such as gravel nand/or asphalt) subject to review and approval of Public works Depa r tinant, Fire Department and Department of Coavnuni �:; Development . 14 . A report prepared by do C-.•oiistical engineer certified by the County of Orange shall. be submitted to the Department of Community Development for review and approval trier to commencing drilling . Said report shall describe noise loirels at the Angus Oil Site property line and a :: the nearest reas-Wentiaal. property :tine both with and without an aacoust�.Cal blanket on the drilling rig and ser.vico rigs . The report shall indicate noise attenuation measures necessary to ensure compliance with tha Huntington Beach Noise Code . This shall include the provisions of they Ordinance Code regarding maximum hourly average noise level at nearest rro-sidential. property line of 50 dB(A) during nighttiate hours between 10 : 00 PM and 7 : 00 M. j a . A double acoustical blanket enclosure shall be provided at man-floor entrancem . i 15. poise attenuation for the drilling operation, oil c ration and service operation shall be provided pursuant to the Jil Code and noise report specified in Condition 14 . a . If a noise violation occurs , the entire drilling structure shall be wrapped with an acoustical blanket for greaten noise attenuation. 16. No speakerw , loud bells or buzzers shall be employed on Rite. 17. Excessive vibration, as determined by the Department of Community Development, shall be reduced to acceptable levels . IS . Light and glare shall be directed anal/or screened to prevent 81spillag6" onto adjacent residential properties and shall be energy efficient uubj ect to the requirements of the Building Division , lq , All heaavy truck traEfie shall be limited to the following streets between the 405 freeway and the subject site : Beach boulevard, Adams Avenue, and Delaware Street . For: entrance to the site only Springfield Avenue and California Street may be usod. . 20 . ftati'vy truck traffic shall be limited to the hours between 7 : 00 AN and 5 :a 0 PM. no No trucks may park on the street . bt truck deliveries shall be staggered so that to stacking lh*!l occur on public streams . t ' Wrleiliti •. . IN'4NI4.INMiF.K:1IG/NIM MSWMf1M1.lY.){JiJ.1/1.lidNl.hi.+W ••a.Yaip►w..hM14iMa:7:l.... ... . ... T i 21 . All employees must park n either one of the two sites . Street parking for errployeos i:: prohibited. �2 . Lucal streets affected by truck :traffic shall be irirpectrid before and after construction. Any damage to .vocal streets by heavy trucks shall be repaired and reconstructed per City re:Zuirbmenitos at the expense of the applicant . 23 . All dri.ve!;3- s shall be radius type and constructed to Public i Works stand;rjs . 24 . There steal.. be no entrance or exit of vehicles from ..}ae drilling site between the hours of 10 : 00 PM and 7 : 00 AM except for emergency purposes . 25. An overload permit should be obtained from Cit;'' and State ( if required.) for all oversized loads to be moved on public streets . 26 . Pipe string camenting through fresh water bearing sands shall/ be implemented to prevent salt water intrusion into the aquifers. 27. A system for collecting, treating , and celeasing storm drainage shall be provided by the applicant and approved bar Public Works .. 23 . Brim water shall not be released into the sewer system. i 29 . A recycling plan of produced zone wester back to the oil � reservoir shall be coxt:ified by the Department of Oil and Gas and ;.:ha Fire Department and all its conditions and restrictions shall be adhered to. 30 . Well service ' rigs shall be operated no more than a total of 48 days per yaar between 7: 00 AN and 7: 00 1,114 or daylight: hours , whichever is shorter . 31 . ho' more than four well service rids may be on the premises at any one time. The service rigs shall not exceed 120 feet in height and shall be d.0able onffled and utilize acoustical blankets as deemed necessary. 32. All, drillir6g raigo and production wells shall be operated by electrical motors and electric pumps only. 33. The 24-.hour phase drilling rigs shall not operate for any longer than 2 years from the i 6sua nce of the first drilling p+�rat3 t. 34. filling rigor for remainingg "all$ after the two pear period tit li comply with fife +rronditcions► Subsequent drilling shall be Madtod to 7 ,00 AN to 10 :00 1M only. 350 Prilling derricks shall not exceed 165 feet in overall height . ( 1.613d) L r I I r:A, w bi ...r......1.1.1..1....JJ•1.rI.w rIJ w. r I • M�.• ..•M.r..J♦..lFM.MM M....V.. .... ............. .r.............r. ... • ...v r.......... ..........r.._.......... .. .. . . . 36 . Upar, completion of 24 hours phase of injection and producer walls , all drilling rigs stall be removed from the site . 37 . Service rigs shall be erected only during maintenance operations . 38 . Applicant shall install blowout prevention equipment . 39 . A 'Oull vapor recovery system shall be installed bs required by the South Coast Air Quality Management District . 40 . O. ply three on-site crude, oil tanks are permitted and shall never be completely full at: dace . 41 . Prepare and submit a Preliminary Emergency Action Plan (EAP) Frior to issuance of building permits . A completed Emergancy Action Plan based on as-built plazas shall be completed and submitted prior to. the start of oil production operations . The Imrgency Action 'Flan shall include employee training and periodic practice, how spillage onto street from sii:e (s) would be handled (stockpile of sand, etc. ) , the safe handling of any dhezmicals and/or materials, and full knowledge of all systems and emergency equipment . A copy shall be on file with the Fire Department and updat;el on a five year 'basis . In addition, a $pill Prevention and t'ontrol and Countermeasure (SM;) Plain in compliance with City requirements fox handling of spills , etc . , not otbarwise covered in the Emergency Action Plan shall be completed and filed with the City prior to the start of oil production operations. 42. All oil must be trenrported by pipeline . 43 . An on-site fire suppression system shall be installed as- a primary source for fire protection pursuant to Fire Departm..:nt requf ramew.ts . 44 . Caller requirements for oil wells : a. A hydrogen sulficls detection system for the well, cellars shall be installed subject to fire Department requirements . b. Fire s►xtioguish&rs approved by the Fire Department must be installed within 75 feet of travel on-site. cs. ProVi.de metal open grate covers over top of well callers. 4S . Starage ' tank requirements: w. Kuat have pro-plumbed Foam injection system installed on all Product storage tanks . Must have exterior deluge water spray system on all storage tanks . ( 1613d) a i i 'JYIM1•YM.1Wby.M�MM.M�1.Y1.111111.1Wr�Ml.`fV..4 .V�MM.I V.I.,u ...r..•I..r ...un.. ....................•........... ...............ur..,.....,r..•....... ., ..., ....-, ...... .. ... . 46 . Site raquiraments : A . ,All diked areas must !-.,) ►e an engineered drainage system. b. Foam storage area a,),1 foam quantity to be approved by Fire Department . c. Fire hydrants to be located in areas approved by Fire Department . d. Hydrogen sulfide detection system approved by Fire Department to be installed on project perimeter . e. Fire extinguishers approved by the Fire Department must be installed throughout the site , f . All gate openings must be 24 feet in width and installation rn+t;at comply with Fire -Department Speci•:ication 403 . 47 . Well cellars shall be maintained in a clean and efficient io!snner to prevent waste accumulation. 48 . Twenty-one (21) abandoned wells have been identified within the � prtiject: azea which do not meet present day abandonment requirements . A contingency plan shell he outlined and submitted to the Huntington Beach Fire Department for review an4 approval with steps to be taken J*n the event that leakage from any of these abandoned wells finds its wale to the surface . 49 . Prior to tefminetiun of the oil operation, a plan shall be submitted subjact to review and approval of the Fire Department and ''Comnunit:y Development h.ipartment, showing how the site ohall be abandoned -and restored to its closeEw- natural state . 50 . There she:'• l be no pipeline ionst:ruc;tion activity outside the site except between the hours of 7 : 00 AM and 8 : 00 PM, Vlonday through Saturday only. dl.. ne methodology of coil recovery for this project shall be iimited to water injection only. Stearn injection shall be p9cyhibi toad . 52. Thom operator shall at ail times during the term of this une Vermit Qtxd 'any renewal or extension thereof , insi.ntain in force 'fin . insurance policy or policias lusuring the operator , and as MWItional invareds the City of Hunt'ingt:)n Beach, tho City Cwncii and 'each member thereof, and, every officer and. employee � of the City acting in the due course of his employment or An his effLaial capsci.ty► against liability or financial ?oars � re st! ng from any Suits , claims or actions brought by any rreoid or per-- s.on*# and from all costa and expenses of _11-ItLgation brought against the insureds, in thv amount of not 1008 than $5,OQO, 000 combined singIG limit . for any injury to pnr.tons or damage to property, ineluding (but not limited to) • , ( 16I3d) .... .... .............. ......... injury or damage. from subsidence and rebound, resulting from the operato-A: IG oil drilling and production activities and operations incidental thereto . Said policies shall provide that the insurance coverage Fihall not be cancelled or reduced by the insurance carrier without the City having been given at least ten days prior written notice thereof by such carrier . The operator shR11 not cancel or reduce said insurance coverage . At all times during the term of this use permit , and any renewal or extension thereof , the operator, shall maintain on file with the City Clerk a certificate or certificates of insurance issued by the carrier or carriers showing that said insurance is In effect in the amount required above, and a copy of each insurance policy. If thn operator does not keep said insurance in full force and effect, the City may obtain said insurance and pay the premium thereon, which shall then be deemed a debt owned by the operator to the City. Any insurance policies procured by the operator hereunder shall provide that the insurance carxi'ar waives all rights of subrogation against the City. It the City obtains any policy of insurance hereunder, such policy shall include a waiver by the insurbnce carrier of all riqhts of subrogation against the operator . 53 . The Planning Commission shall review ai.il, if necessary,, may modify the conditions as set forth in this use permit , at the first regular Planning Commission meeting in October, 1989, and at five year intervals theraafter, and upon any chance in ownership of the project which occurs between fivo-year reviews ; provideli that the phrase "change of ownership" as used herein shall not include any sale or other transfer to a corporation; partnership or other form of business organization in which Alberta Natural Gas-United States and/or one or more of its shareholders or subsidiaries owns the controlling interests , or any sale or transfer so long as Angus or one of its subsidiaries retains responsibility for the operation of the project . 54 . The Planning Commission reserves the right to revohe this use 1,ermit if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Bqhch Ordinance code occurs . The City shall provide the property owner with notice in writing of any violation, stating the City' s basis for determining that a violation has occurred. Tits property owner shall have a reasonable time to cure the violation before further uction is taken. The City may require the property owner with notice in writing to submit written documentation of actions taken to remedy any violation and may require monitoring or other procedures to be implemelftea in order to ensure that the violation will be cured . 55. The nine member project review, committee shall I monitor the project during the drilling ph6se and semi-annually tbereafter . The rise Department and Conwnity Development dopertments shall jointly provide a staff lisixon . k `Ma..rt�r.e.w...✓w.., ....w..r., . w r..rvww.........r............ .. ... ........r..........,...... ........ ....................... ...... .. .. ...... .....•. .... , .... . 1 56 . The property vtlue protection plan submi.ttnd by the applicant shall be implemented as outlined pifor to drilling . 57 . In the event that either one of the two blocks is to be without 24-•hour supervision, a video camera shall be employed on--site to provide continuous survei l lan.ce which can b3 monitored by poroonnal at the other site . 58 . All imitigation measures given in DSETR 88--1 and EIA 86•- 1 ,shall be includd as conditions of approval . 59 . Emergenoy discrarye through the City' s storm drain shall be approved by the Regional Water Quality Control Hoard . h