Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZone Change 89-1 - Code Amendment 89-1 - Draft EIR 88-2 - Ci Ap(?ROVED By CITY COUNCIL y APn121 ; 1989�1 e �:; NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING a e ZONE CHANGE NO 89 1/CODE AMENDMENT NO 89 i, s . iN CONJIs�NCTIOt�WffH DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO 88 2 k ;` � (Remne 160 acre quartersecUon m EHIs=Gddenwest Specific Plan) r � IJOTICEISHEREBYGIVENtlaltheHuntifigtonBeachCltyCouniitwitlholdapudlcheallriglntheCoundlChamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center,2000 Main Street.Huntington Beach Calilornia,on the date and at the time" indbated tielow to regeHe and donelder the statements,of eQ persons wlto wish lobe heard relatNe to the appAcation DATFJiII� Monday May 1 1969 T00 PM � a .., t�€ � ..x '� + •r `� g,j)� Zone Change No gg.laCodeAniendrrentNo B31in�n)undbnwithDrattEnvlronmentiallrtpac Repoit Ap Cityot HuMkfgton Beach . .� f LOCA110N 160aor 166 wed(nthesoutheastquarterofSedion Area34 TownshipSSoutli Rangell Went bounded by EIAs'Avenue Edwardys Street Garfield Avemte and Goldenwest Street(see attached,map) ZONFa .', Mlxture:of(iA(tieahlential Agili utturaq O Rt(pualAled law DeneAy Residential) M7(LIgM Industrial) § and LU' ed if pgQpC)91AL,;,(1).Z M,:TorezonethewblectprapertylromarrdxtureotAA(ResideotialAgricuftureq Q Rt (OuaAlied l ow Donaity Residentiap M 1i(Lfgfa gdustrfah and LU,(Wrd,llse)to EAls rnMest s �`r ice' `•`a $ped[b Pont a �k - d i; �= � `` t ! To erttend the Huntp>guyn t3eachiOrd�nanoe Code Article�'arW estab'nsh the Projeg covered by Dtak ErwGonrttetttal lmpait"Report Na 08 2 rTheCity Council must f fkalt menial impact Report No.88-2 prior m epprov�of}Zane Changelda 8f!t end Code I ON$(,F. 3A�AY d the pm sct fs On fAe in the CorrrrrxstRjr DeVebprrrerA D am r - ""•"3" t j'-� 10116�Of BUbnlit.,6YldB(IC8 f0t Of-- ALt::iNTERESTED PERSONS*are ImAted m attend,said h_Be rkig and express opin aga"ti>a ap'-katbn as outArled above Ali appibations,ext>mits,and deacripti°^e of mie'Pr, are on filewhh the Office of.tlte Cfty Clete 2000 Main Sired Hunington Beach'CalAomla for Wpedion by the pubib "q : ,' HUI�TINt TON eEACtIsCIIY.COUNCIL '` 3 . pati2tf9f�89. 44. }s t 0 806 ...1600 SCALE 1" =1600' } le - 'sa .am 'r c ,A f s I ME L � FA., sx=ry �ks,,t.,�. > "5 , r..w.a.c" yi.ti sus k' ra'"w - .�- r's�=* ;.➢d 3��bmn xa y fi4_ *.' 7 l _ '�' i �w�1.�' t"�',y�'x,°f.' ''s 4td 'j'' , �. ',�`��°-s..w"�, � `;,,.art, �'R Cam'"" �x - .r v � � � •� t 01mm of the City Clot _........... ...._ I Cityof Huntington Brach Far, d� P.O.ow 19O CALIFORNIA 92648 OA 17 r7r� 5 1r0��2�r Itisrprove Elizabeth M. .lauding 5t. Anaheim, Ca 92805 •,n6631- p,41,.rVA1039 Ilt+tit VF-�, �i�tt�ii 37 C� . . ' /AVk ,0.4 ' r 4q4,6 y k � / . V ?.j / '� Office 011 the City clar' _ City Huntington reach y{ ; 10.0, Box 190 CALIFORNIA 92640PEI- _ -� �; j• �•• r' 0T /• ust�lPIRED UNABLE r� 110-212-22 . M A Arrark-?ukis Judy t R/> L�Y y 495 Chestnut #22 I � C]IMSL'FFICI E�1T S ❑ATMAM D NO KN" A.61 arid, OR 97520 U�FLi{yFpft�L�pT _ fitt101r of the CityClerk ...._�_..�.. .. ��;� s. ,..� .. Cityof Huntington Beach '���.�. �� p*'�i j 0- �0 21 APR ,� x 1`wR 2 y .�^.�.. P.O.box M CALIFORNIP 9269 fi i`.t t%T S • /gag • r► ai Nam% !� 110-222- a Steman, rpret J. U. W-14iSLE TO A11E I�J(�:t�f CO f� . - �__- L Office of the City clerk '� ..... .... .�.�. , . „ _ City of Huntington Leach •,r� '" s� ��ti �,� l P.O.I= 190 CALIFORNIA 92649 Q y 00 159-351-17 Faa:, John A. 18 18th St. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 �17r� VAA 'L8 1022,41A1 I-WU T,l.l'1h• 'r-XF'I) P AA-i 3bbl WINUWUN IJR HUN I' BEACH GA y26diY--2UZ6 W URN 'I U SLNUl-h Office of t+lINI City Clerk _ City of Huntington Beach vg20 age r C7 P.O.i0X 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 "t': jt .+ 1 �.001347 9 rov Elizabeth M 225 N. Claudina Street Anaheim, •CA 92805 HAk 2 93126631 D4/27/00 . � HARGROVE I EL :EZKT �Q SENiE.R „RFETUR ApORESS i `y CLEF! -• tai'� / r A 0 Offwe of the City Clerk; ;; 1 .. .. • _,.. . ..., . ... City of 31untington beach - M, P.O.BOX Igo CALIFORNIA 92648 �• �'? ' � I � � 159-352-•11 / Wail ters# L r 4te 6652 Sho Ci AN 646 Hunting 9 SIC Office of the City Clerk +*�.•1+.•�...,1.�..M.1.. •�• _. :•of Huntington Beach � '" � .,- City }' ? 1= ri .. �� i P.O.SOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92"S J: � �: .et�t - � 1 E^°pGls97 r T 110-212-06 ��' O,p��, •�� Thompson ale E. 2117 S. Anchor Street �q► Anah CA 92802 I II�Itttt1t11ttitlln oil ltItItIIItlttlittII tolttlt11 1 1.. ' C i lY1l•Ard',1�.1a6L"Te,'4.,,r•�uR i�wl`,_� �, ., - ---,.�. �. - ..1 =— - --- - r w Office of the C141 Clerk City of Huntington B � t .. Fit F-0•BOX 1t0 CALIFORNIA 92648 •� 2 0 f+? :r�y l � R •' � To #Af a 92627.2 i 34 • Q r XX a Costa M CN ���� ,� fr D�, s 110-221=-1 Kahle, nCe R c;0 liga, Kath(mrine R• 7 Wee1 o Drive ;Wit, orta Mesa, CA 926271416"llool"o-i Vill �` ' oil �• 1�•.r�1i...+.—•....ter•+'u... ...._.. • � � � � 1� •i'1 •' `•1" •`r•• AAM oilof tm City Cleric �, i, 0 4 s- x L't, 1 , Beach : .; . _ �s z A �! '•_�� . of 1juutington , *:a s i 19, it r;1 4, 7. �•1 r; `'�� � t• ' ,S- C� 4 f 80013 7 • it O WX I1 •.....rr+••,••,..-•1•••• • • . u , • it 7b 110-192-08 M clacam Guthrie, Lauri► A• ' C/o Thibodeau, Louise E. Af k4 \' �•'�., `K P.O. Box 317 It s4v l, are �, ,, e WIN& Itkw 0fMw at the City Clark . City of Huntington ach ' PA.box Igo CALIFORNIA 92648 / 159-351-03 jI AJ Faas d Sons 618 18th St. Huntington Scach, CA 92648 I'A A y;].a:1 KL-. I URN I fJ :ak h offl"of ma City Claris . .. . . , City of Huntington Beach : : ` •� P.O.NOX Is* CALIFORNIA 92648 �� �` a •1 ,��fl 15 � ��` % IQ`� •� �� K } t n e C, 52647 �. , 3 ;a A% d t-o 1 bw V i t . • o 01110111 Of the City Clsik . City of Huntington bA - -� PA Box 100 CALIFORNIA 42648 h 52-12 tp �' gip' +� S rtridge Lp Beach, CA 92649 d � 010"o4 the City Cleric City of Hunt' on Beach P.O.Biel Igo CALIFORNIA 92648 159-351-11 Stead, Gregory 3 17582 Wrightwood Line Huntington Brach, CA 92649 STE E 12 J 1251511 FWD TIME EXF�� STEAD 6622 TROTTER DR HUNT- BEACH CA 5�:?h48--:1527 REKT RN TO SENDER Offfa9 of the City Clerk . City of Huntington Beach P.O.0OX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 9 n M. Tr. Oak - i vo .v ' ► B CA 92649 f .a.rA f Publish: 4/20/'89 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CHANGE NO . 89-1/CODE AMENDMENT NO. 89-1 IN CONJUNCTION WITH DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO . 88-2 (Rezone 160 acre quartersecti.on to Ellis--Goldenwest Specific Plan) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center , 2000 Main Street , Huntington Beach, California , on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. ti&TEfT'IM: Monday, May 1, 1989 , 7 : 00 PM SUBJ CT: Zone Change No . 89-1./Code Amendment No . 89-1 in conjunction with Draft Environmental Impact Report No. 88-2 6212LICANT: City of Huntington Beach LQ=IQg: 160 acres located in the southeast quarter of Section, Area 34 , Township 5 South, Range 11 West, bounded by Ellis Avenue, Edwards Street , Garfield Avenue and Goldenwest Street (see attached map) . ,' q t Mixture of RA (Residential Agricultural) ; Q--Rl (Qualified Low Density Residential) ; Ml (Light Industrial) ; and LU (Limited Use) . PRQ 4SAL: (1) Zgnft Change : To rezone the subject property from a mixture of RA (Reside ntisl Agricultural) ; Q-R1 (Qualified Low Dena- ty. Residential) ; M1 (Light Industrial) ; and LU (Limited Uae) to Ellis-Goldenwest Specific Plan. ( 2) Code A ndmant: To amend the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code , Article 930 , and establish the Ellis- Goldenwest Specific Plan. �ai91 a& STAM Project covered by Draft Environmental. . impact Report No . 88-2 . The City Council must certify Draft Environmental Impact Report No . 88-2 prior to approval of Zone Change No . 89-1 and Code A .----ndment No . 89-1. „, i r NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING (Continued) ON ULE : A copy of the project is on file in the Connunity Development Department . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the applici: )n as outlined above . All applications , exhibits , and desc iptiions of this propoRal are on file with they Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Fain Street , Huntington Beach, California , for inspection by the public . HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL By: Connie Brockway City Clerk done : (714 ) 536•-5405 (24e0d-7, B ) i Main rr �C` j � 1 Ilp U�IIII ,w 1 u�in 1� Ell ! NO Fit"I'll" sit �i ,yl��l•lllllf�� . i�II,� �� � � 1 Illllllll I Q r�r►t� yrRy—! _ ti •��I 11�= .`�'_.'' ' _ + t -I', 7 -�.i ill ��►�. ;, _�j•1,..- ;•-.� o. UN ,Illl,f. 4J��ittt<< i „ r - wmob i 1 J4 CITY OF HUNTING HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION ►+u+�rn+crr�.ccH To Wke Adama, Cowuni ty DeveEopmen,t From Connie Stoo.hyAy, Ci ty CEehk NAec&t Subject AP Liht Jon E J_,U-Gotdenweet Mtbfic Date 4/26/89 fleMing x neeommend that the heating be continued d .16 yowv depatttment is viiabte to provide, the City CZeAk',6 06 6ic io th an a6 iiday.c t veAi6 y i.ng ,that .the AP VAt rAov,cded to the Ctak'd 066+i.ce " based upon the Mopex mapb bum the county and not 1997 county mare. 76 it iz not tega ty nca",6aky to baAa the AP tt6t on c1.ment county mapb then the vent 6iaation ahoutd btate 'that it 1.4 not tega t y necuwy, T know you want the heating .to be Zegat too and T auppo4 a 'that i4 Why tie company AP'a bhouLd atmyd be uAed t6 : th&jcWunt county maps ahe not kept, 1 mudt know by Ukx 2 ptm, at the tateet 4o T can change the agenda to 6tate- that the he4kiAg wzu be continued, f. 1 w CITV OF HUNTINGTON BEACH �.� IN ; -DCPARTMFN"f COMtt�UrJICATION IUft411'%6T PJ ell(11 To Connie Brockway From Mike Adorns, Director City Clerk Corrununity development Sub'ec NOTIFICATION FOR ELI.IS/GOLDEN-- Date April 26, 1989 J WST SPECIFIC PLAN i Be advised that there has not been any recent subdivisions, tentative parcel reaps, or lot line adjustments within or 300 feet outside the 160 acre quartersection which would affect the assessor parcel maps. The notification labels provided rreet the intent of the requirements of Division 9 and the State Law. Mike Ada s, Wrector Community Development Art Folger, i Deputy City Attroney (2573d) i JJ CITY OF "UNTING,ro" BEACH JJ - 1�17T_:R•DITARTMENT COMMUNICATION IIlIkll�ilNV 0!A(If 1 o Corrrale Brockway, City Clerk Iron, 1111,,e Adc�nsa , I?i.rectot: ("o1111nun J.tv De lopinen 1: Subject NOTIFICATION 1.7011 f"LLIS/GOi.nFNUEST Date April. 26, 1989 SPECIF FC PL.AI! He adviseci that there has not 11r_ei, any recent :subdivisions, tentative pareal insps, oar 1oL 11ne aci_justntents within the J.60 acre quartctrsecr►on which would affect the vssess3or parcel intaps. The notification labels prolicled nteet thf: Intent of t.)1v rf`auirenwrtt:s of Division 9 and State Law. Mike Adarne,�Direc:tor Confmunity Developirrent j Ar- ,- FnI er, - Dcputy City Attorney I f � r EM5/1.3LDEKIESi MASTER 0WNEkS11•^\ rcarttrrc LABELS 08100 1/17/89 t U � r ( � tom/ . } � 1�;cL.1 1-22 )a9-351-QA �;►ri � � is r. 15t9' •351-11 c ty, ruc.l:xr Y. Nestern Ho�cx Corp . (o�'(� Stead, Gregory J Huntington St. f'.(1. Doc'llf3r"s (1 a� 171iP?.Wrightwood L.kne , Huntington Ilearh , CA 926,38 5urt-.Et beach, CA 907,I2 Huntington Heath, CA 92649 i59-341-23 159-3 ',i-24 159-351-06 Reilly, Cal•olsA A, Wilurran, Ronald W. / Orlando, Raymond John lt�240 lfuntin,7ton St , 19230 Huntington Ss, 19501 S. Starr Circle Huntington 132ach, CA 961.648 v1 Huntington Beach, CA Q261B Cerritos, CA 90701 )59-3 51-1? <<j r i `r� i 159-341-25 159-351-14 Engle, James M. i Oal Crognale . Louis ;' Busche, Gene A. 1 --237Q4--4-r-e"-5F P.O. Box 5446 21151 Lockhaven Circle Laguna Niguel , CA 9?677 Carson, CA 90749 Huntington r7each, CA 92646 159-35143 ! 169-351-10 159--351-17 P AJ Faas 9 Sons ✓ Thomas, Janres Warren , Faas , John A. „ 618 16th St . 61.81 Ruebons Drive 318 l8th St. Huntington Beach, CA 92.648 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 1 1 159-381--0,1 ,f t r / Gel 159-371-01 I/ •, -T�cr Chris 1-echt Central Part A16 �� Duane Ke.'lcr 6811 Hitching Post Circle 5772 Hitching Post. Circle 5861 Hitching Post Circle Huntington 6-arh, CA 92648 Huntington Beath, CA 9'26,16 Huntington Beach, CA 92046 M-352-05 4.'l c( � !�� 159-352•-12 i:1� - iJ``-- ��,i, } 159•-351-19 Kubelka, 9,1rton A. Ti Duncan, DavidP,/10-� r>�11� ,�'i''' Edwards,Linciborc-Da.h' �1 _KhTrl la Av-e:` 11A - 5Q42 Partridge: (fj 17220 Ncr,hone St. W226 Las Alamit( CA 90720 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 159-352-06 159-352-13 159-351-20 Chapman, Gerald L. J Raboy, Nolar 0. (� Country View Homeowners Assn, 6742 Shire Circla 6671 Shetland Circle �f c./o Western liomex Corp Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Bach, CA 9264§ ; 17205 Pacific Coast Highway t! Sunset Beach, CA 90742 159•-35?-•07 159-352-14 159-352-01 Watson, Gordon M. Tr, waste lfamex Corp .��; t( S� �. Gale,, St9ven L. 5021 Uovewood Dive P.O. Box 188 P.O. 'So 702 1' Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Sunset Beach, CA 90742 `ahittie.r, .C.A 90608 159-352-08 ���••t� 511 C 159-352-•02 159--352-09 Dahl ) rk vid D. G1 i ' i -,� '� enoivin, John A >�� Eng, Virg;ant Chee I(ei 505 P& Avenue 6671 Shire Cir,,le 6692 Shire Circle Balboai Island, CA 92662 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 (08100-1 ) i l 10-22�+-10 1111-z�2--11 110-222-14 Cuek, Juan Newcomer N Young, Noma 0. Spel ts, Louis C 541 hill R,o4d 9500 SW areanburg Rd. N11 � � 471 Walnut P1 Santa Paul&, CA 93063 Tigard, OR 97223 � Costa Kesa, CA 92627 110-222 -16 110-222-18 110-t22--19 Adler, Kenneth S. Townley, Nmllie A Smith, Raymond P. . 24221 CillP Di r-a Louisa., Ste. 20U 1. nl Box 23 9946 Dahlia Ci r•clo i , 92708 I.�+guna Hills , CA 4265:; F'fontayua, CA 460fi4 ountain Valley, CA i • 11222-•:;C 110-222-21 l 110-222-22 TRai , James CJ Powers, Mary E. Sterman, Margaret J . ' 10610 l.a Alondrh Avenuo C �. 5470 Castel Hills Dr. 455 S. Irving Blvd. .--• Fuuntain Valley, '.A 92708 San Diego, CA 92109 Los Angeles, CA 90020 110-222-23 110-222-29 110-229--01 Gustafson, Frank r a:ilor, Daniel r Bealo, Gladys C 1121 Alabama 11.0. pox 231 475 N. Midway Drive #142 V Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Midway City, CA 9265.9 Escondido, CA 92027 f Mary Bell Janet P4jrkins Alexis Burquotto 20292 Eastwood , ircla 5811 Middle Coff Drive Smoky' s Stable Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 172CO Bolsa Chica Road Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Pat Lockhart Eddie Milligan Linda Felix Oceanview Stables Huntington Central Park Stables Huntington Crust Stables 18662 Edwards Avenue 18381 Goldenwest 6202 Ellis Avenue Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington (leach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Margaret Lindsay Mike Martin Jayna L. Moore 10081 Beverly Drive Southern California Edison STA Huntington Beach, rA 92646 7333 Uolsa Avenue 550c Newport Center Drive Westminster, CA 92683 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Thorras C. King Thomas T. Yuge, P.E. Rhonda M. Evans W.O. Box 168 Cetech Engineering Environmental Mgt. Agency Huntington beach, CA 92648 2360 Plaza del Amo, Ste. 11s) 12 Civic Center Plaza Torrance, CA 90501 Santa Ana, CA 92702-4048 Hali Thorpe Susan M. Doyle Joseph Hartge, P.E. Knickerbocker & Barsam 3478 Buskirk Avenue R.MG Engineering, Inc. 2315 L mits Blvd. Suits 1005 1796i Cowan Lomita, CA 90717 Pleasant Hill , CA 94523 Irvine, CA 9271; L.S. gates Eliza. Dixon John T. Fisher/Deborah Cook 18761 Capernse Street Wesco Homes, Inc. 6692 Shetland Circle Fountain Valley, Ca 927U8 2601 Airport Drive #250 Funtington Beach, CA 92648 Torrance, CA 90505 (OB10D�) awsk IE,9-371-04 159-371-06 Layton PMiilip D +��, � Gilderman Alaxandd 1 Yu Suchuan U21 Hichingpost Circle �'� . �` 6C22 Hltrhingpost Circly 6042 Hitchingpost Circle Huntington Desch, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Batch, CA 92648 159-371-07 \ 159-371-09 159-371-P ) Stillman Jer win ' Hol thaus Virran E Songa Hi cobumi 6852 Hitchingpost circle k" 6a62 Hitrhingpost Circle 6861 Crrral Circle Huni.i ngtun Beach, CA 92 648 i Huntington Beach, CA 92640 liur,t i r,gton Beach, CA 1$9--371-10 159-371-11 159-371-12 Hirn Gregory G �,' Wrzesinski Cieslati Fifield Richard 6851 Corral Circle 6841 Cr,rral Circle 6821 Corral Circle Huntington Beach, CA Huntington Poach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA r 159-3 71-13 159- 1081-05 159-381-08 Cully Michael R Smith Wayno H Geisse Laweence J 6826 Co,•ral Circle 6772 Hitchingpost Circle 6811 Corral Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 159-381-09 '159-371-14 Leicht, Linda Hong Sung M Gall , Randall C 6811 Hitchingpost Circle F791 Corral Circle 6846 Corral Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntingtoni Beach, CA I Orlando, Ray Harris, Hary Sunderland, .John & Ian � S371 Trotter Drive 18381 Goldknwest Street 2E42 Kemper Huntinyton Beach, CA 92648 Huntington (leach, CA 92648 La Creccanta, CA 91214 I Fleacchiole, Barbara Perkins, JsnQt & Mike Pai, Aaron L Sher 6691 Shire Circle 5811 Mi ddl scoff Drive 6781 Hitchingpost Circle Huntington Beach, CA Huntington Beach, CA Huntington Beach, CA Olson, Elmer Shrubsole Mike & Maureen Milligan, Erin & Patrick 110 E. Electric Avenue 17091 Erwin Lane 8591 Dorenere Drive La Habra, CA 90631 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Plesic, Kaey Don Martel , A.I .A. First Team Walk-in Realty deed, Robert 901 Civic Center Drive West 6781 Warner Avenue 1831 Pine Suite 360 Huntington Beach, CA 926.47 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Santa Ana, CA 9270:3 Bonnie ttaymand Nate Delgado Knitter R Associates Daytower Ltd. 3990 Westerly Park 22939 Hawthorne Blvd. M340 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Torrance, CA 90505 (OB10D-a) .,A James Lu Margaret Yoh Richard Chan 6071 Manortinid Drive 6301 Pac wont trrivo 5592 Mussvale Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Cheryl Stead Al Applerose Steve Gale 6622 Trotter Drive 6622 Trotter Drive 6651 Shire Circle II Huntington Beach, CA 92V 8 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 i Elmer 01 s, , .1 Mr. & Mrs . Machado Roger Yeh Premium Properties 6812 HitchingaosL Circle 6301 Pacemont Drive 11C E. Electric Street Huntington Beach, CA 921648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Lk Habra, CA Robert Ghodooshim G i 4 Multitex, Inc. 819 Santee, Suite 302 Los Angeles , CA 90014 Linda Thomas Dolores Lingle Travis Mitchell 19782 Scenic. Bay Lane 3817 Atlantic Avenue 2919 Gardena Avenue Huntington 3,!ach, CA Long Beach, CA Signal Hill , CA 92648 90807 90806 (Olf1O0-1) ► r.,r lir i Wit Thchoas ,4. ,� Keith Wi chner `1 � Lisa DeGrucci o WW2 Trotter Drive ► �� 1721 Pine Street `` � 19541 Sandcastle Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Bear:h, CA 92646 .\nn Mays dolly Putersc!►n Dahl Co. 19822 Wind,janner Lane Remax 505 Park Avenue Huntington Beach, CA 9264-; 18030 Brookhurst llalhcn Island. CA 92662 Fountain Valley, CA 9270B Susan Napier Sheila. Blanford Teresa, Falzon 3303 Harbor Blvd, Ste. K-12 21462 Pacific Coast Hwy, Sp. N2,8 14182 Runcho Costa Mecca, CA 92626 11unt1ngtnn (leach, CA 92643 Westminster, CA 9F683 159-351-94 f 159-351-05 159-351-07 Tsang Samuol M 0 Nolff Werner ✓ Wendland Dale A 6541 Trotter Drive 6561 Trotter Drive 6591 Trotter Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92643 Huntington Doach, CA 92647 Huntington Brach, CA 92648 159-351-08 159-351-09 159-357-11 Coombs Rachelle C v% Irvine Tracy Stead Cheryl 6601 Trotter Drive P.O. Box 1266 6622 Trotter Drive Huntington Beach, C4 92648 Sunset Beach, Ca 90742 Huntington Reach, CA c?648 159-391-12 159-351-15 ✓ 159-351-16 01 O'Neill peter T Wysocki Louis Edward De Maio Arthur J 6602 Trotter Drive 6S62 Trotter Drive 6542 Trotter Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 159-352-04 _ / 159-352-08 159--352-09 Davis Michr;el A w Boom Darryl C Eng Vincent Chas Kei -60000 Shire Circle 6712 Shire Circle 6692 Shire Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92648 hunt ington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 159-352-10 r 159L6652 352-11 ` 159-352-12 J Alraoroty Robert V� Noll N r,/ j Duncan Sandra R 6672 Shire Circle re. Circle i 6661 Shetland Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92647 on. Beach, CA 92648 j Huntington Beach, CA 92648 il5lrr-332_13 J 159-357.•14 15-9-352-15 Raboy Nolan 0 Gatton Philip N Jankowiak Donald B / 6471 Shetland Circle 6691 Shetland Circle 6711 Shetland Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beech, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 1307 1E$-371-0ti � ` 159-371.-02 J `N 159--371-+03 Keller Duane J ` Chung Sang �l� park Young R MI Hitehingpost Circle 6651 Hitchingpost Circle 6841 Hitchingpost Circle Huntingtar Beach, CA 926" Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 42648 (08100-7) .-............. mow 110- 192•-06 110-192-07 110-192-08 i�uine, Mercedes V. Enenbach, Hugo J . 1 Culhria, L.u"a A. Z900 Park Newport N401 `•�"'�� Motheral , John E. F�� ` + c/o Thihooeau, Lowi se E. Newport Beach, CA 92660 P.O. Box 713 P.O. Box :517 Lava Hot, Springs , Idahn 83246 Lewiston, CA 96052 110-192-09 110-192--11 110-192-12 Taylor, Michael Leer Caroic:hael , George M. et-. ai Swart :, Tholma G. 615 12th Street 1571 Rarnrllo Avenue 2231 Magnolia Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Long beach, CA 90815 Lang Reach, CA 90806 110-192-14 110-192-13, _ a - .11 110•-192-19 �i Marow, M1 ton H. Adler, !G:nnc•th S . Meyer, Richard W. Jr. Tr. 864 N. Bundy Drive 24221 Caile 0o Lit Louisa, Ste. 200B 1750 E. Ocean Blvd. , #404��, Los Angeles, CA 90059 Laguna Hills , CA 92653 Lang Bea&, CA 90802 110-193-03 11b-193-0.1 110--193-05 Bird, Martin W, Douska, William J. Morton, Harold C. Conover, Margaret B. ,i 1305 Idaho Street P.O. Box 2455 157 West 200 South Coos Bay, Oregon 97420 Hor•th Hollywood, CA 91602 Springville, Utth 84653 110-193-07 110-200-05 lio-200-10 Morton, Harold C Hathaway, Julian I, Tr. Huntington [leach Co. 220 S. Arden Blvd. 10707 Norw;.lk Blvd. Property Tax , Lol Angeles, CA 90004 Santa Fe Springs , CA 90670 P.O. Box 7611 San Francisco, CA 94120 110-200-14 110-200-15 110-200-19 Sunderland, Robert C. Ichiba,hi , Akira Huntington Beach ✓ P.O. Box 497 ✓ P.O. 753 2110 Main Street Valley Canter, CA 92082 Lomita, CA 90717 Huntington Oeach, CA 92648 110-200-20 110-200-21 110-200-23 Huntington Beach Crxrpany B1asgen, Michael W. De Nubila, Virginia, M. Property tax 33 Whippoorwill Road 11728 Chaaaral Street P.O. Box 7611 Chappaqua, NY 10514 Los Angeles , CA 90049 San Francisco, CA 94120 110--210-01 110-210-02 110-210-03 Landis, William Ross, Lorna rr. Nicccle, Michael W. et al 1901 Ave of the Stars , Ste. 470 9152 Loma Street 400 3rd Street Century City '� Villa Park, CA 92663 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Los Angeles, Car 90G67 110-210-0 110-210•-07 110-21Q-190 Schuesler, John R. Spelts, Louis at. al Niccole, Michael Waync M... 4832 Curtis Circle 471 Walnut P1 . ` 400 3rd Street- Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Huntington 5each, CA 92648 110•-210-11 110-211-01 110-211-02 Gordon, Muth L. et al Smith, Gynoth P. ►' Borghotti . Ronald P. 2219 Greeroleaf Street I. Box 702 10205 Disney Circle Santa Ana, CA 92705 Lake Arrowhead, CA 92352 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 (05100-3) T. ....�.�. ....--,.._.'ram 0 /I r 110-x11�Jx 110-zit-04 110-211-06 Ma1`rivr, M11 tdn H. Tuns tal l , Charles G. Tr .► ''1 Weir Oil Co. 864 M, bundy Dr. P.O. Box 546 ' ""` 401 e0th St. NA Los Angeles, CA 90049 Wildomar, Ca 92395 Huntington Coach, CA 92648 110-211-09 110-211-10 110-211-11 Hawali , Peter Eitrada, Ignacio F. .- Per•cr, Higuul Vargas 'fr. c/o Howell , Lora C. 715 Alabaria Street 2230 Florida Avenue .W E. Yvon Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 lucson, AZ 85704 i10-211-•12 110-211-•13 110-211-14 Perez, Miguel Vargas Tr i Wa.)d, Uena Jeanne 7_ef,Pda Perez, Miguel Vargas Tr �.. P.O. Box 1645 1310 W, Palm lane 2230 Florida Avenue Cuata Km a, CA 9262H pnoe,iix , AZ 85007 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 1'10-212--01 110-212-02 110-212-06 Cobb, Marvin Folmar, Cecil J. Thompson, [file E. c/o Van Buskirk, Antoinc►.ce v, 230 hospital Circle 2117 S. Anchor Street INS Cliff Drive M2 Westminster, CA 92603 Anaheim, U. 92802 Santa Barbara, CA 93109 110-212-07 110-212-10 110-212-11 _ j' Weir Oil Co. Brewn, Leslie Brown, Lrzslie 401 20th Street 8281 Tyler Circle 8281 Tyler Circle ! Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA y2646 110-212-16 110-212-18 110-212-21 Thompson, Dale E. ✓ Amnrk, Judy Folmar, Cecil 3. y Y' 721 Wi'.lims Avenue 675 Chestnut Street 230 Hospital Circle Huntington Beath, CA 92648 ,Ashland, OR 927520 Westminster, CA 92683 110-212-22 � 110-213-02 110-213-03 Amark-Zukis, Judy Bates, Laren S. Hoer, Kenneth V. 495 Chestnut #22 18761 Caoense Street Bullock, Beverly B. -- A;bland, OR 9752Q Fountain Valley, CA 92708 2207 East 30"0 S. Salt Lake City, UT 84109 110-213-04 110-213-05 110-213-06 Catron, belbe!•t Franklin Parks, Jann V. Parks, Jann V. 14732 Van 8r,r•1n St. Bower, Jann V. Bower, Jann V. Midway City, 1 92655 2679 San hi gr,el Circle 2679 San i41 guel Circle Thousand Oaks, CA 91350 Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 110-213-07 110-213-10 110 213-12 Wallbank, Erik W01 bank, Erik Borghetti , Ronald P. 2300 $lack Oak Way '� 2300 Black Oak Way 10208 Uisney Circle Ashland, OR 97520 Ashland, OR 97520 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 110-a20-02 110-221-01 110-221-02 Brindle, 8onald I. Shafer, Dickson Tr .� Waller, Stevens Tr 10051 661den West Street 232 Evening Canyon Rd, 626 Wilshire Blvd. #804 Mw Ungton Reach, CA 92648 Corona del Mar, CA 92625 Los Angeles , CA 90017 toeloa-4) y}Y •``r.r' FiT i T I.n •1• .1 7 � 110-221-03 110-22145 l iti-221-05 Mann, Willi p. �,�- • Allan, 'lobert H. � � �� �r� Title Insurancf; b Trust Co. Tr 36.12 E. Loom;, Street c/o Mitchell , Patricia H:-' - Tr #38-51'52271177676 Lakewood, CA 90712 4147 GarYdania Avenue 1717 Walnut Crove Avenue i Long Reach, CA 90807 Ros"uad, CA 91770 110-221--07 110-221-03 1 10-221-09 Ogilvy, w Walker, Dorothy J Hargrove, Elizabeth N 4060 Chapman P1 tip' 19712 W. Avenue of t1o., Oaks 225 N. Claudine StraeE Riverside, (,A 92506 Newhall , CA 91321 Anaheim, CA 92805 110-221-10 110-221-11 1 f 0-221--12 L"iort, Barbara A. � " Kahle, Vance R Hoffman, Edward R. 11911 5W Lambert Road c/o DaliRa, Katherine R. ) ►.•'' 2290 Brigden Road Santa Anx, CA 92705 736 Woolo Drive. Pasadena, CA 91104 Cost. Mesa, CA 92627 110-2:1--13 110-221-14 1 10-221-15 Walker, Dorothy J. y Keller, Malvin F. Deutsch, Werren Clifford Tr - 19712 W. Avenue of the Oaks 4534 SW Hewett Blvd. 9100 Wilshire Blvd. #8-E Newhall , CA 9132.1 Portland 1 , OR 972.21 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 110-221-17 110•-221--18 110-221--19 Bank, Union b Tr Co of LA Tr Mitchell , James C. Pettitt, Margaret J . Tr #P1022 1 Newport P1 #900 c/o Mayer, Richard W. P.O. Box 2193 Terre Annex v Newport Beach, CA 92660 13191 Newland St. , Unit 3 tot Angeles, CA 90054 Garden Grove, CA 92644 110-221-20 110-221-21 110-221-22 Terry, Sill U. Ford, Janet Scoul l er, Emma F 4294 Yanauard Orive 515 W. MacArthur #15 Lawson, Miriam S Lompoc, CA 93436 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 613 Huntington Avenue Huntington Beach, CA 92646 110-221-23 110-221-24 110-221-25 Sherrill , Robert L. Walker, Dorothy J . Hargrove, Elizabeth M. P.C. Box 2112 ✓ 19712 W. Avenue of the Oaks 225 N. Claudina St. Avalon, CA 907OD4 Newhall , CA 91321 Anaheim, Ca 92805 '110-221-26 � 110-222--01 110-222-02 - Hay, William Smith, Mary Ann Woodson, Hiro P.O. box 9932 12082 Chlanti Drive 10241 Barbara Anne Newport Beach, CA 92658 Los Alamitos , CA 9072.0 Cypress, CA 90630 110-222-04 110-222-05 110-222--06 ,r Lang, Robert D. ` Huhbs, Kenneth Fuller, Leland C 117-F Riverside Avenue 7072 Hoover Way Fuller, Margaret M Newport Beach, CA 92663 Buena Park, CA 90620 1447 W. Powell Gresharr.. OR 97030 110-•22247 110-222-08 110-222-09 Butters, Lois P. Tr ,� Jacobson, Allan R Jacobson, Allen Robert P.4. box 1202 6822 Loyola Drive 6822 Loyolr. Drive Paradise, CA 95967 Huntingtan Boach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 (08100-5) 158-352-10 159-352-17 Cra,chioj'o, Salvator W. Aldorot.y, Robert. / r�y'�� Mandic, Robert P. Jr. 6691 Shire Circle , 6672 Shiro Circla �:+ . '� 111[ Main Street Huntington beach, CA 92647 Huntington tteach, CA 926-11 Huntington Beach, CA 92640 6A. ` 1 d , 159•-357.-11 4 -`clry � "J 15'1-351-18 �J.' Mctlavits/5nti tit 02 ; ) 1,;1 11 4� Wal tern,�Larru R, efe 505 park venue -" �y i uu52 Shire Circle C t!' 6032 Jar"' nwood or. t' balbcs,ls A?d, CA 92 ,;2 \'Huntington Beach, CA 92646 ,.� �*�" Hurtir+gEan (teach, CA 92647 159-'s52-19 { r � 1C,9-352-20 159-352-22 Fisher, John CPi°� 4� R Plunkett, Glenn r. Country View Homeowners Assn, 8921 'l y Way 6672 Shetland Circle Western Homex Corp, Westmin Pf r, CA 92681) Huntington Beach, CA 92647 17205 Pacific Coast Hwy / Sunset Beach, CA 90742 15h-352-24 110-190-01 110-190-02 Edwards--Lindborg-Ddhi Hathaway, Julian I Dahl , David n. 17220 hewhope St. #226 u� P.O. Hox 2124 505 Park Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Santa Fa Springs , CA 90670 9alhoa Island, CA 92662 f 10-190-05 110-190-06 110-191-01 Hendricks, Constanco Ann Pacific Amer Oil Co. Corp FJacran, Randi 299 Hermosa way 17220 Newhope Street, Suite 127 P.O. Box 5255 San Luis Obispo, CA 93,101 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Chula Vista, CA 92012 110-191-02 110-191-03 110--191-04 Gooding, Prod W. Lindsey, Margaret McKinnon, AN c/o Fjaeran, Randi ' 10081 Beverly Driyo t.arson, Fay M. P.O. Box 5255 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 8229 Leas Pasadss Drive Chula Vista, CA 92012 Whittier, CA 90605 110-191-05 110-191-06 110-191-08 Oliver, Ted Fjaeran, Randi Kovner, Urbara Gratz 2204-0 Via. Mariposa East P.O. Box 5255 634 S. Orchard Drive Laguna Hills, CA 92653 Chula Vista, Ca 92012 Burbank. CA 91506 110-191-12 110-191-13 110-191-14 McKenzie, Charles P. et al Lang, HA Est Morton, Harold C P.O. Box 477 c/o Fjaeran, Randi P.O. Box 5255 Sun City, CA 92381 P.O. Box 5255 Chula Vista, CA 92012 Chula Vista, CA 92012 110-191-15 110-191-16 110-191-17 Marow, Milton H Hanks, Heber T Liao, Daniel 864 N. Bundy Drive c/o Fjaeran, Randi 18192 Riverside Circle Los Angeles , CA 90049 P,O. Box 5255 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Chula Vista, CA 92012 110-191-18 110-191-21 110-192.01 tindery, Margaret ✓ Woolpert, Duane V. et al Martinson, Ron 10081 Beverly Drive 2399 E. Pacific Coast Hwy P.O. Box A � Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Long Sgach, CA 90804 Vista, CA 92083 (081 OD-2) f i Tu SMIT HESS -----_-_--- _ Dole Apri 1 21, 1989 Scott -- IIe_re's the _form that should have covered thr: -- Ellis CAoldernobt Public hearing labels; - Please have. Mike: N3,31mi & Art Folger sign wiUi the T-otat.ion that the title ecxr(mrly lists were not neic:essi vy to use (par the 1982 WA of Mr. Pa1ins tha bir Folc er. _— --- determined was Courici 1. diLacti«ri) . _ If they can do _ a staterirmt to cover all future xabli.l:: hplarin s as ____—well as this; oneblien we can know that the last_ —� dsbE:JuaLJ molls (6/88) i5 a1 s OK, but that title _ DUPLICATE Signed comDany ones espocial lY if_mare rec:m are 2.rigei e. _ Thank you I 1 Uall� Signed 45 - SETJD PARIS I AND 3 WITH CARBONS INTACT, Rely►ok 130 frill0i1! PART 3 WILL YE RETUNNID WITH REPLY. 4 M • l +y 4ffoe of the City Cbrk nR ANCE COUNTY, . CA-, u2ting�onCity if 11 Bach CENTENNIAL011 P.O.box W ,ALIFURNIA 9?64e. .3 MAY ZV- F,aas , John A. 3551 Wi ndspun Di-. Huntington Beach, CA 92649 C 1 rn-35] --•l 7 I '(�li'1R:!:i.l. �:':L I)���.r1:3•�I:I. I::�l•JI;� L.a:i�'il�: I:�;�:F'1:) F'r1�"11:i i:y'L�i;•'- L.I,gt'i::il••i:J:FiI: faf� 1..IlJl�1'I• I::'I:::�''�I::;II i:;F'� c'�••�ha}•�. Office of the City Clark - �,�` % ,. City of Huntington Beach I P.O.pax 190 CALIFORNIA 97640 � m... ..-- ,' �"•�,, Alfred :,. Fa as 3551 �•;irxispun Dr. ,'xmi ington Mach, CA 92549--2026 F.,P,A�. 1-Ir,Mt;H'Y:RE DR RE-11JR14 •r(') r;END .H .y C"ff._of VW City Cleric City of Huntington Beach P.O.Box 190 CALIFORN1A 32648 i Engle, Jaees ill. 29301 Traon Street LaSu, �ii guel, A 92677 ENG 01 11.2rz1�N3. E R T E)F.N TO SENDER NO FORWARDING IRDER ON FILE UNABLE TO FORWIPO r. C f y M. A 1 L qw '1 ELLIS -- COLDENWEST SPECiF IC PLAN City of Huntington Beach Department of Community Development Planning Division City Council approved on JUM 19, 1989 • tl � r F t ' , •ram_ r— - -- - - _ 1 .. •R l l i", * o' �I1e • �1 I �, r w • C R M, IN I RODUCTION ' A. PURPOSE 1 B. GOALS ANT) OBJECTIVES 2 'r C. PROJECT AREA DESCRIPTION 2 ' h. APPLICATION PROCEDURES A, ENTITLEMENTS S B. SPECIAL PERMITS � Ill. GENERAL PROVISIONS A. PERMITTED 10 B. CIRCULATION 1 i C. COMMUNITY• 7A MF let D. GRA DING 17 E. EPJVIficONMENT)1L CONCE12nl� 19 i F. HOMEOW�JFI2':> ASSOCIATIOTJ I 'I l IV. ESTATE RESIDENTIAL A. PR0JE::T A`."1:-i1 21 B. MAXIMIah! DENSITY 21 ':, ESTATF� �ESIUENTIAi. SUBDIVISION 21 D. ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES 2 E. RESIDENTIAL EQUESTRIAN FAC:ILITIES 23 j E. COIL ACTIVITIES 26 � G. CIVIC DISTRICT 26 N. MISCELLANEOUS 26 'V. APPENDICES ` A. DEVELOP'MENP STANDARDS FOR EXISTING SUBDIVISIONS 19 b. DESIGN GUIDELINES 31 1 •rW , W% i f LIST OF EXI•lfBITS EAhibit Page I vicinity Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2. Specific flan A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3. General Plan Designations . , . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4, Existing Toning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . 7 I S. Arterial and Collector Street Profiles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 6, Internal Collector Street Circulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 7. Private Street and Interior Trail Easement Profiles . . . . . . . 15 8, Open Space Corridors and 'frail System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 y r I. INTRODUCTION A. PURf',.,SE The Ellis-Goldenwest Specific Flan area has been the subject of special planning for a number of' reasons. First, it is the largest area in the City desigtin for Estate Residential development and as such requires spacial implement ordinances. Second, the area is close to significant open space and r areas including Huntington Central Nark to the north and the Bole, lowlands and proposed Dolsa Chica Linear Regional Park to the v location, in combination with the area's natural topography, creai.. opportunities for views, :open space and recreation areas to be Incorl, „u development proposals. Third, the area ;s a focal point fur equestrian ties In the City arid, with proper planning, can continue to accommodate this use. The area contains oil resources and continued access to thin resource is an important concern. Last, there are a number of constraints i 3i the area such as existing single family residential subdivisions, the lark of public works facilities, and the diversity of property owners and parcel sizes, which if not addressers through the planning process could result in piecemeal, uns:oordirrated developments. The purpose of this Specific Plan is to irnolement the Estate Residential gelleral plan land use designation and to ccordinate all development in the Ellis--Goldenwest quartersection by way of a comprehensive strategy tailored to the unique characteristics of the site. 'ne Specific Flan will parrnit estate residential (single family detached residences) on large lots with sensitivity towards the existing topography and provide equ.str•ian amenities within the quartersection. Many properties in the Specific Plan area currently ha%• ! an RA, Residential Agricultural, zoning which allows only one dwelling unit per acre. Existing estate: residential subdivisions have a quaiified-low density residential zoning classification which requires equestrian nmenities within associated subdivisions and- estate residential development standards. Th,,;re are three areas in the Specific Plan area which have been subdivided into small lets (sometimes called encyclopedia lots). TheL2 small lots have an Lit, Limited Ilse zoning designation. Limited Use zoning restricts use of the property to farming, grazing, trails, orchards, greenhouses, picnic grounds and other similar uses; residential uses are not permitted. The Limited Use zoning also has a minimum 10 acre project area requirement prior to the evablishment of any of the permitted uses. Anothor property in the Specific plan area has an M1, Light Manufacturing, zoning which is not consistent with the City�s General Plan, Development on this property can not be approved until this zoning is brought ,1 Into conformance with the General Plan or until the General Plan is arrerided. C 1 (0825D) T 76 " .a 1ti 04 S. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Upon adoption, the Ellis-Goldenwest. Specific Plan will be the zoning for the entire quartersection. It will allow properties currently zoned P.A. to develop at a higher density than currently allowed. It will allow the properties currently zoned M1 and LGl to develop as residential in a manner which is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Estate Residential. The general location of the Specific Plan area is depicted in Exhibit 1. The following goals and objectives for this Specific ;Plan incorporate policies from the General Plan. 1 , To encourage and maintain a well-balanced variety of residential densities and uncrowded living environments by encouraging National use of the land and other natural resources. 2. Allow for Elt:ate Residential with equestrian amenities. 3. Provide adequate internal circulation and mininaize direct access off of adjacent arterials. s 7 � circulation s , 1 i. ,Encourabe ...n rntc.rn,.! �,i. rulc�tior system that conform., to the site's natur:,l topography and provides view opportunities where possible, 5. Encourage: coordinated e.esign of development and imprevernerits (Le. curvilinear streets, fencing, lnridscaping) to enhance visual appearance. 6. Preserve significant topographical features and minimize alteration of natural terrain. 7. Provide for continued equestrian uses. A, Create a zoning classific:loci of a specific plan for this unique area. C. PROJEcr AREA DESCRIPTION I. Boundary -• The Ellis--'Goldenwest Specific Plan encorapasses the area generally bounded by Ellis Avenue to the north, Edwards Avenue to the Invest, Garfield Avenue to the south and Goldenwest Street to the east as depicted in Exhibit 2. 2. .Chm'Acteristics -- The Fllis-Goldenwest Specific Plan includes 160 1 acres of primarily t;ndevelope d land. It is characterized by gently rolling 'f topography with two pronounced ravines which traverse the central and eastern portions of the area. The two ravines collect storm water runoff and cnnvoty it into Huntington and Sully Miller Lakes. Significant oil reserves underlie much of the area. ti i r. 2 (os25D) 1 r ' 44 00 i _- 'NARNER AVE „ Loo I , k4t -- ,%ATEAVE• - IIINN TkLBERT' AVE 1 5 ELUS AVE GARFIELD AVE .�........ .- H ' I N ProJect C ADAMS AVE i A Ali rq r Vicinity Map Exhibit 1 (0779D) 7-. :4 w• " B LLLIS AVENi.1E ELLI:3-GOLDENWEST SPECIFIC PLAN ► * Will albw an overall density of w 3 viits uer acre. i .. 17 W. ..._ YAW GARFELD AVENUE Specific Plan Area Exhibit 2 4 (0779D) ' I r .1 General P1HU — The City's General Plan designates the northern portion of the specific- plain: area for estate residential development at three dwelling; units per gross acre. The southern portion of the area is designated as estate residential at four dwelling units per gross acre. (See Exhibit 3). Because of its natural features and resources, the Specific Plan arf..a incorporates planned open space corridors which 1s consistent with the goals and policies of Open Space and Conservation Element of the General Flan. The open space allows for residential developments which maximize the area's open space benefits by incorporating open space into development plans. 4. Existlaff.Z2niag — Existing zoning within the area consists of a mixture of RA, Residential Agricultural (108 acres); Q—Rl , Low Density Residential (30 acres); MI, Light Industrial (2 acres); and LU, Limited Use (20 acrc s). All of the study arc.) has oil production suffix zoning which allows servicing of producing wells and reactivation of idle wells. All properties with frontage on Ellis Avenue or Goldenwest Street also have the — CD, Civic District suffix which requires any development on these Parcels to be reviewed by the City's De,;ign Review Board, (See Exhibit 4) S. EziWa Land Use, — With respect to land use, the majority of the study area is utilized for oil and natural gas production and appears vacant except for scattered rail wells, storage tanks, pipelines, and service roads. Approximately 30 acres are presently developer) or approved for single family residential de!►elopments. I3etween Edwards and Goldenwest Streets, one tempovary commercial horse stable occupies approximately S acres and a commercial nursery occupies 36 acres. 6. EXistina ClEcu latio — ArteHal access to the Specific Plan area is currently provided Fy Ellis and Garfield Avenues and by Edwards and Goldenwest Streets. Internal circulation within the area is limited and consists of segments of improved streets within existing subdivisions and a network of private dirt roads that connect oil wells. The lack of adequate internal access in the study area is a result of lard hiving peen subdivided without dedication of right--cf—way for access and public streets, The provision of a Coordinated system of circulation is a major planning concern in preparing an overall development strategy for the Specific Plan area. I i i 5 (0825D) l r�1 �h r. I f ESTATE RESIDENTIAL (3 DU/AC) • ••�•a• r• •• •• ••• j ESTATE RESIDENTIAL kill 02. 4.0 �`:.,pti: i:• , . . :+a�Y:':�: '.'.I�i':r•i•'•'•. W (4 DU/AC) a i�•,.:J•r;:1ati4;. • A�•f•y.4i i i.•d i.a:.i i i i•`�.;a•.:.� .'.•i.'.i;:i✓••d.r •�".i.•:•. i i rYr',i.J f•c.rI. .a ti.ti•�a.}�, • •�.•ti•:•i: r•.'Yrw ':•ji ff•..'.�a•ti�i.'.;•;r;•:•i'i•::'.:•.::'.':::'J J Y..'.;�•...���rh.•��•••.r. •la•iiiai a•:�'i:a•ab•:f:a•:a;a'J•'a:4'::' : �r� i}ay:S'l•:/:':•a•J:•: .��ti''•`a1rY•S'.`. ::i•••4 larldri'.•r'.:' ♦ •. ••a ti • ....a��::�ra.;r+.,tiJ�;a;•�••a'.r••1•�ti..•a}aaa..ar..'..•.:. •• l•��dii1 i':';iYi•�i�'••;aa•{i•i�i:i':'.+•a.':•ia}:+:'�'i"i i;�i:�:'i`i; + + •.�'''•�•{rr�•i'tii•iri:, ��•�i':•fa•i a• i.r�ti:�::�a:'.•::'r ti:'�.•. h•;..; 1..�::a.�riiai.'i•+ ''•.lr•'.�i is ..y.••.a•.a..•�.••r ' • of••.•:'::'+.�•'1.;.�..'•'••rti••:'::ti ti•:.•:'r�•�.::•i o i:ii•i::':{•}:a:'.:�:i� `�' �••.•��:+:.�"r,.;r;.:•a.r a a•.• a.a• .:i li r�i i•�•.Yr•i.'�•i:l••a•:::•P.:` ' �• .•+iL.••..•a.:�.'„'�•:`}:f}:�•.'�'•.•�.i.�•••r•••�i•�r••ti;•�•�•i;•;�,:s'•••;a;�:iri'.�:i••:: .rlr�•�.;.�i a:.:;r.:.4'a;a!;.a:.':•':ai'�'Y .;r �'.;..f�i;••;ii':i•i;� � ;:+ r i'i����: • ..'.:.�.a•••'�...•.'i -o �••�'d•�-i i'•�'i'i:i:':::'',:':i:::::`:• •1 A. .r.� r,,•.�.1. S:•..':iii'�ti i i i�•i�'�i•�'i;.�f.�r;r;:.;::':.Y:i:.':i::•;•r:r�rti4ti;.;.;.�.•�.,..�.r;�i;.:�.• •..r•• r•�r•':i:':rtiti' :'i r'i:a .•. ....: .i:'+•::•i:': ::�.•••.•�•��::aL:;a••.. �r:i;; �' ..r..• • � �r.�.;�.;r��;:h.�.Pyr;i{.'�;�•i.•i:�'.i':i:::�'.•'�:'.•.•:':•.�:'�'i it�.'ii�i �i'i.`i�•i i i:i•:.; r ti r. :r.i•'•:'r'r'.•.;r;i�.1:.;r•::i'i a a.. ... la. (-• Y i�':'. '1r'•'ri+ a3'...��ti'•• :...1:.;.�:a.,.a:b��.�1��`a::�4.a:•a�a•�:.' :��•:•�;i;:' :•.. �� • .[�lJl.'l ti�i 1'i.; :•.:�.•::':4:'i'.'.'.. : :��: '�•:�::i�r;•:•.':.; ..�':;a•r•: .:.;i�. ;ai,.; /.7 w r.'L.1'Y. •.•.••••••.;a;.;.�:{a'a'.•a;.�:.'Pa; :':.i..: .:.} ..:.i a.•a'i���•:a�!:. .•r. 1-% Vf Sri rrr•�.•.�titia'i as r+• •;;r•r'. :.;. :•i!;a,{.'{a;..':.}�••'.�. .. .. ' 1'•a•,AM ':•i•�•+�•�a.:;r r�;r;r;'rr;�;r;;.�.;r�.`:r:.1 .-.�{•�.;{.;rir;•'r•a•i a'.;•�:�•a;i;:`:a�:a`•;�i;:P:r`.r:.� _ y I Fh 1 .r .• . .. . ..�� ..•..,..r.. ..• .•:r,:.•.,::..:.a'a.4h�a:.h.i a:''•4:r::••-• •. r.' :.r4•....a.. •t..L �.� Yr••i.'�a.•i•:�:.;a:;a••;.;a'i r�'..r;.�.;.� �r�::.�.r�.�•;.;.f;a:4'+h'.�a�l•'a•'.'a;•':+': ' � •ti.'..Yr'.:1.� '• !l. ti• •��:i .• ;�;':•'.•::•4�. �..: �` _•;a•a�a a.-tia;:.•.a.a•: .:.i':..... Jr�.�:.`ab; ra .a`a a.. .a..a..�r.� .. Yj ti ••{:• •is•h;a'.r;a;••'aa:+:••':'••:':'���,::a;a•••.•:••;.,a;{.h;•;�a•a;.'a;a'a;a;:a;.,•+;a a a.�i;:;:;:':•:;.•. C ` .};►±{•i�;•4h'•+d:...h•.;•i.'•.... :r.a.,:.titi��r.!..•.•1..•a a';.•:a::.'.;.;.....V..i � 1 •••.a• ,.�i••}•:•sY:�:;r:•a•::':::::;:'.':.•a'a':1a':.'�::•::;a:4•i�:'+:i:::•'.'.;a'.'.:'::•::':• Y .+ • •�aa'.;ti�•::'�':'a4:::•:a:'a'a'�.' ............... • ;: r•a•a a;.'a•a;';.',;.•,��••.ar�r •+. ,i�i•i.r••}�•};a�:i'.�r•i•i•:••a:'•' '::•i•:'tii4•:• J•i '••::ia�•t•.y1;:.;..;•;X.:::.:a•.,. GARFIEL.D AVENU . i General Plan Designations Exhibit 3 6 (n779 D) 1' i b 11n1 • � • '� �r�y;" t Kai'^'+:L � � � '.1 Ml • L•44 d' 1W �'lr�i� N.J i..Aa+��Ow..f :.�V.... ..5_ if:'I ( d r• ,yf • vtt F t tx r +' o � tt ! it 1 °:��� ��f��� '•�f,:1e • F� 1 1. ,., EL APPLICATION PROCEDURES A, (ENTITLEMENTS 1, All requests for development, within the Specific Plan area shall require the approval of a Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Tract Map pursuant to the provisions of the Huntington Peach Ordinance Code. The Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Tract Map applications shall be submitted noncurrrently to the Department of Community Development. In addition to the standard submittal requirements, applications for C.UP's shall also include site plans, floor plans, elevations and cross-section Profiles for each lot. Tentative Tract Map applications shall include all existing trees within the proposed subdivision and a rough grading plan shall be submitted for the entire subdivision depicting existing and proposed grade elevations, Lot sale programs shall provide conceptual site plans depicting building pad locations, cross-sections of each lot and private open space areas. 2. The Subdivision Cc,>>mittee shall make recominendatIons on such projects to the Planning Commission for approval, conditional approval, or denial. Prior to project approval the Planning Commission of the City Council shall also consider the following: a. Prole;:ts shall be in conformance with the Sped fic Flan and the adopted Design Guidelines for the area. b. Architectural features and general appearance of the proposed development r hall enhance the orderly and harmonious development of the area or the community as a whole. C. Architectural features shall be incorporate'-! into the design of all exterior surt'aces of tl �, Luildings in order to creaie an aesthetically pleasing project. d. Front and rear setback should he varied in order to provide break ira bull. and interesting street scenes. 3. Amendments o. revisions to a Conditional Use Permit (master plan of development) previously approved by the Planning Commission may be approved by the Commission pursuant to a Site Plan Amendment with public hearing. Prior to approval of the Site Plan Amendment, the following findings most be met: 8. The revision shall not constitute a substantial cl'znge. b. The use of property shall remazn the same. C. If residential, the dwelling unit density shall rem.,iin the same. d. The revision shall rosult in an improved development. e. The revision shall comply with all applicable provisions or the fEllis-Goldenwest Specific Plan and Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. $ (0825D) r . 1 ' SPECIAL, PERMITS 1, An application for a special permit requesting deviation from the provisions of this Specific plan may he filed with the Department of Community Development, ind such application shall he heard concurrer,tly with the Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Tract Map applications, Deviation from the development standards ur• `c; .a percent may be granted ,c at the time of approval of the project by spec: J permit, Special permits shall not be granted for exceeding maximum density or minimum project area. The Planning Commission may approve the special perm it application in whole or in part upon a finding that the prorxmed deviation will: a. Promote better living environment; 4 b. provide better land planning techniques with maximum use! of landscaping, site layout and design; C. Not be detrimental to the general Health, welfare, safety tend convenience of the neighborhood or City In general, nor detrimental or injurious to the value or property or improvements of the neighborhood or of the City in general; d. Be consistent with objectives of the Estate Residential development standards in achieving a project adapted to the terrain and compatible with tK*.- surrounding environment; and e. Comply with state and/or federal lave. 9 �... .a,..Al 1 'A k 1•'�P 7'. ice.4 P��iSON I S The Ellis-Goldenwast Specific Plan shall be subject to the definitions contained In the Huntington Mach Ordinance Coda, The following general provisions shall apply to all developmeat projec:ti: PERMITTED USES 1. The following uses are permitted subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit (arid Tentative Tract Map for subdivl.sions) by the Plannin C'ommissiorl: a• ,�iesiia� r (1) Single family detached dwellings, one unit per lot. (minimum 9,000 net square foot lot size; minimum 15,000 net square feet for 20% of the lots) (2) Land subdivisions intended for lot s.a!e programs, ht Open 4acetR-ciz=Lm (1) Private recreation area for the exclu,:ive use by members of a homeowners association group. (2) Private recreation area or uses for exclusive use of hoineowner(s). (3) Cornrnerciai equestrian facilities subject to the commercial equestrian ."acility development standards contained in the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. (4) A three to flee acre neighborhood park with?n the quartersection which may include equestrians orientation. C. Ceneral (1) Public School 2. T:7e following uses are permitted .subject to the approval of a Use Permit by the Zoning Administrator: a. On-site equestrian facilities in conjunction with single family dwellings (requires minimum 12,000 net square foot lot size). b. New all yells and all consolidation projects shall be permitted subject to applicable provisions of the Huntington teach Municipal Code and Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. S. The following uses are permitted: a. Continued operation, reworking aml/cr drilling of oil wells active at the time of adoption of this Spe;-IFic Plan shall be permitted subject to applicable City Regulatfons. 10 (022SD) s , �7 In ti 4� � low p ON b. Accessory buildings suet, as private garages in conjunction with single family residential dwellings, c, Open Space corridors. X CIRCULATION 1. ' &te +.41 5treeU. Direct access of resident;&*, streets and private driveways to arterials shall be limited and subject co the approval of the Departments of Public Works and Community Development. A. Riahu=aL-7WAY far ALL . Additional right-'of-way dedication may be required at the time of project development. 'Trails along arterials will serve to link proposed the Bolsa ►;hica Linear Regional Park. and Huntington Central Park trails and will be incorporated into the Orange County Master plan or Hiking and Riding Trails. Garfield Avenue and Goldenwest Street public rights-of--way shall be dedicated and developed in conformance with the City's street design standards subject to the approval of the Departments of Communit:y Development and Public Works. Future improvements or realignments to Edwards Street and Ellis Avenue public rights-of--wey shall be offered to the City for dedication. b. k,afawArtvx1iU. A, landscaped area shall be provided adjacent to arterials (Garfield, Ellis, Goldenwest and Edwards) subject to review and approval of the Departments of Community Development and Public Works. The arterial landscape easement shall be a minimum twenty--five (25) feet In wlcith and shall contain a minimurn eight (8) foot wide equestrian trail (sec. Exhibit 5). Building setbacks shall be taken from the interior landscape easement line. The landscape easement area shall be privately maintained. C. 11mWrary cres.a. Temporary access may be taken directly off an arterial provided that: (1) the temporary access is approved by 'he Departments of Public Wo:ks and Community Development, and (2) the developer pow a Mond with the City before recordation of a final map sufficient to cover the costs of renmov!ng the temporary access. The Department of Public Works will determine the amount of the bond to be posted, Conversion to the rpproved permanent access point is required upon completion of the necessary local collector street: and/or- arterials to planned ultimate alignments. 2. Collector Streets,. Internal collector streets shall be constructed in conformance with the conceptual alignment shown on Exhibit a, Said streets shall be developed in accordance with the requirements of the Department of Public Works. a, A=Cxz to.ItltelMitl Col, lectara_. Direct access of private driveways to internal collector streets shall be limited and shall require the approval of the Departments of Public 'Works and Community Development. b. Ujbgc.ifM Internal 911ecter Streets. A landscape/equestrian trail setback easement area shall be provided adjacent to al! internal collector streets as depicted in Exhibit 5. 11 (0825D) ` �YY�II * ORDINANCE, 110 . ?. AS ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE XMIN=X BRACH ORDINANCE CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 9061 TO PROvion CH non of ZONING FROM RA-O, RA-Off/-' CDo LU-a•-CD, MI-�CD, Q�•-kl- (2 . 7) -0•-8 , 000 , Q—Rl-(3) -6 , 000-CO, Q-R1-(3)-5 , 000-CD TO ELLIS-COLDENWEST SPECIFIC PLAN ON ARAL PROPERTY IaOCATED WITHIN THE 160 ACRE QUARTERSECTION BOUNDED BY ELLIS AVEMMo EDWARDS STREET, GARFIELD AVENUE AND GOLDEMfMLZ STREET (I1ISTRTCT MAP 38) AND AMENDING ARTICLE 930 BY AVOING SEemy' 'd) ELLIS--GOLDENWEST SPECIFIC PLAN i State Planning and Zoning Law, the iss:ion and Huntington Beach City C �• , ; �� ( e hearings reIativL to Zone Case No . (3. f;,+}�; • , 1 , ,herein both parties have IA; ce 1 ;!t• tj "o t;ion presented at said hearings , and aft , rt�r� G� '` tndings and recommendations of the Pla �y�F ,-��i6A nce presented to said City Council , the sldt such zone change and code amendment are propJL and consistent with the General Plan . NOW, THEREFORE , the City Council, of the �:ity of I-Iuntirgton j Beach does ordain as follows : SECTION 1 . The following real property located in the 160 acre quartersecti.on bounded by Ellis Avcnue, Edwards Sti:eet , Garfield Avenue and Goldenwest Street is hereby changed fLom RA-a, RA-0-CD.. LU-O-CD, M1-CD, Q-R1­ ( 2 , 7) -0-8, 000, Q-R1 (3) -0--6, 000-CD, Q-R1- (3)-8, 000-CD to Ellis-Goldenwest Specific Plan (District Map 38) : Southwest quarter of Section 34 , Township 5 South, Range 11 Otest bounded by Ellis Avenue, Edwards Street, Garfield Avenue 'Lnd Goldonwest Street as shown on a ,nap thereof recorded in Miscellaneous Maps, Records of Orange County. n• y +r ORDINANCE NO . tier" XNAM OF THE CITY OF MMTINGTON BEACH AWNDING . THE ORDINANCE CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 4061 TO' FROVIDX CHAPQE OF ZONING FROM R. A-O, RA-O-CD, LU-O- CDO , M1-Coo Q-X1-(2 Y 7)-d+6, 000, Q--R1-(3) -6, 000-CD, TO ELLIS-GOLDEMEST SPECIFIC FLAN 'ESL PAOPU W"TED WITHIN TAIL 160 ACRE QUARTERSECTION r 66=ft0' BY =3 AVEM, EDWARDS STREET, GARFIELD AVENUE AND lLD$W=T 8TR*ZT ,;,(VX8TR1CT MAP 30) AND AttENDINC ARTICLE 930 BY ADDING !SECTION 9300(d) LLLIS-GOLDENWEST SPECIFIC PLAN r ' WHEREAS, pursuant to the State Planning and zoning Law, the Huntington! Beach Planning Commission and Huntington Beam City Council have had separate public hoarinqs relativt' to Zone Case No . 69-1 aed Corse Amendmnfit plc . 89-1 , wherein bath parties h&ve carefully considered all information presented `at said hearings , and ' after due consid6ration of the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission and all evidence presented to said City Council , the City Council finds that such zone change and'',code amendment are proper and consistent with the general Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Bench does ordain as follows : ` iSECTrON 1 . The following real property located in the 160 acre, guartersection bounded by Ellis Avenue, Edwards Street , r Gaif eld Avenue and Goldenwast Street is hereby chanced from RA-O, . 9A-O�-CI], LU-O-.CD, MI-CU, Q-Rl-- ( 2 . 7)-0--8 , 000 , Q-R1-(3)-0-6 , 000-CD, Q-R1 -` S) 8, 000-CD to Ellis-uoldenwest Specific Plan (District Map 38) • Southwest quarter of Section 34 , Township 5 South, Range 11 West bounded by Ellis Avenue, Edwards Street, Garfield Avenue wind Goldenwest Street as shown on a map thereof recorded in Miscellaneous Maps , Records of Orange County. i jr d �u F` i M=IOX 2 . Section 9061 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, District Map 38 (Sectional District Map 34-5--11) is hereby 406n4ed to reflect the change contained in this ordinance and on the may attached hereto . The Director of Community Do.relopment is hereby directed Co prepare and file an amended map . A copy of such dimtrict map, as amended, shall be available for inElpection in the Office of the Cl iy Clerk. SECTION 30 ' The Huntington Beach Ordinance Code is hereby amended by adding Section 9300(d) - Ellis-Goldenwest specific Plan an depicted in the attached "Exhibit A" . SECTION 4 . This ordinance shall take effect thirty ( 30) days after its passage . PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Caty Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a/ Qg%e� meeting thereof held on the 26th day of �. ,�.��er� 1989 . i Mayor r ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: F M City Clerk. c:.' --.10 City Attorneys J-7 REVIEWED AND APPROVED : INITIATED AND APPROVED: 77 City Administrator Direct r of Community Development r Ord 2998 •,�& r MR.Ir , , s, � � I I r * .,•, ✓��� fY�r�}1�lMi�',l if�F�1'FI�� 4Y ` , .•N 7' `��ti . �l( .I .,' "J.4•'.�• �.! ., �f. r!1.,aM • +• ru r 199 , ,G No. 2998 it ,r y STAR IFORNYA � COUNTY OF h CITY OF HWITINSTON BEA01 CONNIE BRO,�KWAY this duly,, e lected valified Ci . q 1 i Cl airk of the"c t ,i, of Hunti jgtor Beach' and ex-of fi cio Clerk of the City Council of -the said O ty,;,do hereby certify that the whole number Of aleirrbers of. the City Cooneil`,of the City of Huntingtdn Beach is; sevens that the Forego ng cordinance wis read to said City Council at a regulex y; _ meeting tfierof held on the ,, „ ,day of wA nee! , 19 aii'd 'wa's arjain 'read to said City Council at a regular r_urned neeti ng therof held on',I the ;!6th day of June 19 89 , and was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a mri3or ,lty of all ' the members r f 534d City ,Council .', 3 AYES Coundilmembbrs: j MacAlliste'r. Green,.' 4linchell , Bannister, Erski,ie , NOES: Counc.i i me0bers: ABSENT: Gounc i l rne1p bars: Mar�'s, S11va out a1: roorn) a City Clerk and e off ci to Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California . ! I i fi ��'rl Ike 7V, 1 , r M y M r7: r ';""'oHt�'^ •�>/`f .n,''i�ry' /,,Opt:qri '�. •r.H .err 1,� r, 1 r '+�'• ( , 1 a 1 Parkwray. Trail fi'•, r 8 8 12 20 Za- Arterial St v®et Profile Ip Trait Trail r 10 4� ' 8 ' 33 13r 4 1 Is 42 115� Collector Street Profile Arterial and Collector Street Profiles Exhibit 5 12 (08x5D) 1, L ►+t+,�i°�Irv� ,�+ o � '�� - _ � y," Yip �!� �r�:' �4,�'� •� i � r ray ` � r Tc � �,k��!M11h�Y`�Y"/`�4�T��;%�Ir'�'�', r.M`�`N/dR': i-�i. r•�r',�� �Iry4�^L"'' el'0�{,�-a`°P r t. �iw2�++��+��1l14 w+' Yrr��ttVCii+ram+r ��.. i�r.a M...�r.�y.. f� i I � I I1, GAAFIEL •AVENUE ' AC- CESS POINTS op i Internal Street Collector + 'o Circulation Exhibit 6 13 (0779D) 1�,rq s r"•' rr vRh s i The setback easement area shall be privately owned and maintained. All fencing within the landacapad setback sires shall oonform to the fenci"s provisitwar of this Specific plan and Design Guidelines. C. :- v t.._a 161aut C �Ilgi1ts1L� is iher internal collector streets i all nclu4e d • ea which can serve trail link for volopment projects which do not have direct access to the public ,f Open space Corridor and can also; wve its art.emergency parking area. d. Intift;$ , e : An intrti'im barter shell be placed at the location depicted in Exhibit 6 subject to the requirements of the Police, Fire, Public Works and Community Development Departments. At such time as the internal collector street % fully improved, a determination to retain the barrier shall be made.' All property owners; within the 160 acre quarter section shall be notified in a timely manner prior to a public hearing before the planning Commission. 3. Prixgti Sire. :tesidential streets shall be privately owned and maintained. Said stre•ets•shall be improved in accordance with the conceptual design standards for residential streets depleted in Exhibit 7. All struts shall be curvilinear if feasible and shall contain a five (5) foot wide pedestrian easement adjacent to the curb. 4. Gigner,al. Recreational circulation shall conform to the Orange County Master Plan foi- bike ways/trail$. C. COMMUNITY THEME I. i►soa_ce Corridars Open Space Corridors shall be established as depicted in Exhibit S. Development within Open Space Corridors shall be limited to recreational trails with appropriate fencing and public works facilities and utilities. The open spate corridors have been designated as primary Components of the overall drainage system in the quartersection. The Open Space Corridors shall,follow'to the greatest extent feasible the alignment of the existinil natural drainage swales which traverse the area. the Open Space Corridors shall be held as common open space by homeowner associations. The open space corridors shall generally be delineated by those areas below the fifty (50) foot contour. The precise dirnensions'and location of the Open Space Corridor shall be subject to review and approval of the Departments of Community Development and Public Works.The Corridor shall include a minimum easement dedication of sixteen (16) feet for a public equestrian/ recreational trail. The equestrian/ recreational trail shall be setback a minimum of twenty (20) feet from any habitable floor area, 14 (0825D) ♦ .sky!� /I.r� y,� I }' ' !��' 1 y r ` r . ! ► �rtri�n ease���t ftdostrrian Ea settre,nt Wm 03 v I 42 Prtvats Street Pro. f lle I ` 1 ��w Trail 4 ' 4 25 1 25 Internal Trail Profile Private Street and Interior Trail Profiles Exhibit 7 15 (0825D) ` 4 do* 1 �•' 0 ; 2. con Open"re use privet* streets shall be guarenteed by r r WO" OrMaGat r raing with the land describing At open spike and its ism aid fmp"wemeht for the benefit of residents of the ;,,; d ►�ii ` dent. prior to recordation the disvelgwr shall nit with the 11m at- ot.'Community Development, with the final subdivision trap, ` a ;,. ,►. , el x CIPSIt6d t�i:: h.wiii prpv+ide.For xwstricting the:use of common . . • ,. � purpose, as'approved on the firs/ development 0an The City may also roWire that the homeowner's association relittquiah ah dovelopmont rights in ubmmon areas to the City. All common improvements includInS but not limited to trails, project fencing and common open space landscaping shall be completed by the developer prlor,to the sale of any► lots and/or units. All lands to be cpnveyed to'the hameowner's association and/or the City shrill be subject to the right of the grantee or grantees to enforce maintenance and improvements of the common space and public trails easement, 3." LnndjcaS11pg.,- Landscaping shall meet the following requirements: Landscaping shall be in conformance with the adopted Design Guidelines for the area. a. All'setback areas fronting on or visible from a.street shall be landscaped and'permenently maintained in an attractive manner. Such landscaping shall consist primarily of ground cover, trees, ahrubs, and other living plants, Plant materials shall be drought resistant. b. Dec6rative designs elements such as fountains, pools, benches, sculpture, planters and similar elements may be permitted provided such elements are incorporated as a part of the landscaping plain. C. Permanent automatic irrigation facilities shall be provided in all landscaped areas. d, On.-site trees shall be provided as follows: one (1) thirty-six (36) inch box tree for each residential unit or the equivalent of thirty-six (36) Inch box trees as provided herein...Seventy-five (75) percent of the total requirement shall be thirty-six (36) inch box trees and the remaining 25 percent of such requirement may be provided at a ratio of ane'(I) inch for one (:) inch through the use of twenty--four (24) inch box trees. Additional trees and shrubs shall also be planted to provide a well-balanced landscaped development. e. A distinctive landscape area shall be provided at the corners of arterials for enhanced landscape treatment subject to the requirements of the Design Guidelines. The. area shall be greater than the general 2S foot perimeter setbaO. and the perimeter fence shall have a 4S degree angle at the corner. 16 (0823D) r i ,•if '•1'�J1nY l:l 41 ' 't• .+JW NM^y1ti'L.�vya..,,,.,... •,,ryr rlpr,, ' .,, , 4. I!x Walla amd H._reg Fend MW wells shill be to conformance with he adopted Design Guklethm for the area. . ; a,, XMt v k , pa. Fences, hedges and berms shall not exceed three OW ner-half 1/2) feet in helSght m4y be located in the front yard iitback area provided the t the fence is a wood picket, wow rail, wrouAt-iron or other similar type. ptncing is not permitted within five (3) feet from back of curb. b. Side and Xard Fences. The use of solid fencing including wood, M*ed concrete, Concrete black, brick fences not exceeding six (6) feet in height may be located on the required side or rear yard prepekty lines. Wrought iron or other similar type of see--through fencing may be used in conjunction with swimming pool areas, subject to review and approval by the Department of community Development. C. Simi„jntersectinn Visibi;LW, an corner lots, no fence, hedge, wall, sign, structure, mound of earth, landscaping, or other visual obstruction between forty-two (42) inches and seven (7) feet in height I above the nearest street curb elevation, shalt be erected, placed, planted or allowed to grow within the triangular area formed by measuring 25 feet from the intersection of the. front and exterior side property lines. Trees trimmed free of blranches'or foliage so as to maintain visual clearance below seven It!) feet are exempt from the , above prohibition. d. Hei$bt,Mc .g em.,.at of FPnvx cc-Wall. The height of a fence shall be as defined in the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. S. Eali s tr i n Italia A Mfn frhm al t�-on-j161 fgg&n ylidth public eo jjjan/Eerreatign trail dolementaball„fie, ;ram far a n Wic eauestrlan&ncrgatian U,U. All developments must provide trail access to the open space corridor or primary equestrian/recreation trail subject to review and approval of the Department of Community Development and shall be In conformance with Exhibit 8. Equestrian ',•-alls shall by improved in accordance with the following standards: a. Tread width shall be a minimum of eight (8) feet. Trail tread area shall be graded smooth, -free of weeds, stumps, roots, debris and large rocks. Adequate drainage shall be provided when grading. b. The trail shalt be clear of all obstructions from ground level to a height of ten (10) feet. 17 (0825D) AM •i i ELLIS AVENU � �. -wpm- it 40 P * i ��' • do • imp • f 1� • .+ db d H r T1.1 1. b • • • • • . . OF . i . w . .6 r 1P • f • s • o ! i GARFIELD AVENUE i open specs —I 6queetrian Trail • I Open Space Corridors and Frail System Exhibit 8 �I • 18 (0825D) rr ) rt ! '! ► q, u L All trill fen aft shall be subject, to the provisions contained in the Design Culdeltnes. d. Interior equestrian trails shall confrirm to the profiles contained In Exhibit 7, D. 'GIMDING Lirmitad grading may be allowed in Open Space Corridors for trails, access bridges w to enhance the open space character of the area subject to review and 4ppmal'bar the ftoctar'of Community Development. A 1982 reference tq ography cont6ur reap shall be on filed with the Department of Community Development its order to establish topography prior to development and to resolve land use issues. G radln$ activities for development tn'other areas shall not involve more than a two foot cut And a two foot depth of fill from existing topography as depicted in the 1982 topography contour map. Minor deviations may be permitted subject to the approval of Director of Coimmurtity Development, Grading plans shall be subject to review and approval by the Departments of Community Development and Public Works. These provisions shall not apply to grading for roadways and drives nor for oil well cellars as required by the City's Oil Code. All structural designs shall fit the natural land forms to the greatest extent possible. Use of j terraces and split level structures shall be encouraged where appropriate. E. EN'VIRONMENTAL CONCERNS Refer to Environmental Impact Report No. 88-2. P. 1I0MEOW1 F.P.S' ASSOCIATION All developments shall submit a legal Instruments; setting forth a play) or manner of permanent care and maintenance of private sewers, pipes, facilities, drainage swales; recreational areas, communal facilities and private.streets. No such instrument shall be acceptable until approved by the City Attorney as to legal form and effect, and by the Community Development Department as to suitability for the proposed use of the open areas. Dedication for public equestrlanlrecreational trails/easements shall be offered to the City and accepted by the City only after all improvements have been made. 1. Common open spaces are'to,be conveyed to the homeowners' assor iation and the developer shall file declaration of covenants, conditions find restrictions which will be submitted with the final tract map for approval, which will govern the association. The provis'.ons shall include,'but not be limited to, the following: a. The homeowners' association shall be established prirlr to the sale of the last dwelling unit. b. Membership shall be mandatory for each buyer and any successive buyer. c. The open space restrictions shall be permanent. 19 (d825D) MIlAM• xwr ,' 1 , d, It the development is constructed to incr meats or p'larses which is tre one or more final main, reeelprocal covenants, enditlons, and r"Outicm and redpwol ma nagement and maintenance agreements +* doll bo utablishead which will eausa a mwging of Increments as they aft tewleat"t and emboo one homi*wnere' ametation with .. . Corp"" arenas for the total developm*nt. ? S. Membership shall be mandatary in the Mn'ter Homeowners' AsMbdofflon or similar mechanism for nisirnteenance of all common ear *Meet areas. 2. Ressler matritenance of the arterial laridscaos and equestrian trail eenomeent, collector street landscaping and equestrian trail and interior }; equestrian trails and other common areas shall be they responsibility of a Master' Homeowners' Association or similar entity. The precise mechanism for establishing a niathte:nance programs for the entire quarterserction shall ti be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney, Community Development Department and Public Works Department. 20 (0825D) U �' ✓ r 1�r h�rF Ji �' 1' I uh' 71. --.r__. � ___ � � r F, yl• of A. PRONCT Awl TM Mudmum PM t am for any proposal shall be ton (10) grou *pt or4a asy cotulst jvalopmelt ttatacaratigupw parcels provided each R"!' SUO&M a minim of five (s) gross aa�"ea. The dowity of aw M*t shall be a maximum of three (3) units per grass acre. C. ESTATE RUIDEWIAL SUBDIVISION 1. All lots shall contain a minimum of 8,000 net square feet of SM. , Twentypercent (20%) of the lots. within�e subdivision shall be a � miturnum of 15,000 net squf1r, a feet. Estate/equestrian lots (12,000 net 4,1 ku-40 a,fos t or Brea ter) should to located adjacent to a designated equestrian trail. 2. Lot dth And,EaWUxa. The minimum lot franta a shall be seventy-�two,, ;, ('��). feet atxcept for cul-de-sac and knuckle lots w�ich shall to forty-five � .1 (49) feet. 3. Site Covergge. The maximum site coverage shall be thirty-five (35) percent of the net lot area for multi-story structures; forty-five (45) plrrcent for singlt�story structures. 4. XJMMM The maximum building,height for main Xtructures shall not e�.6eed thirty (30) feet trnakimusn 3.1 fai'16 hfrhyss lige" or two etories�es defined in the Huntington Beech Ordinance Code. The maximum building height far accessory structures sha;l not exceed fifteen (IS),feet. S. Sg ) quireMents. All main structures shall comply with the following minirfiUm setbacks: a. . The minimum front yard setback shall be twenty-five (25) percent,of lot depth provided further that said front yard setback shell not be lobs than thirty (30) feet frdni'back of curb and neatd not exceed forty (40) feet. Front yard setback shall be measured from back of curb. b. Sid& Ya . The aggregate side yard setback on any lot shall be a minimum of twenty (20) feet; the minimum setbki .k on any interior side shall not be less than five (5) feet, and on any exterior side not less than 10 feet. C. B.Car YarA. The minimum rear yard setback shall be twenty-five (25) feet; except lots exceeding 15,000 square feet shall be a minimum of 50 feet. hear yard setbacks tor lots abutting arterials shall provide varied rear setbacks from twenty-five (25) to thirty (30) feet. d. ,Eat o Covers. Patio covers may be constructed to within ten (10) feet of rear property line. 21 (0S25D) r Y r •r '06 The mirdmum "I dlst&WA betwo m ft twain structwe and accomy otructu shall be tan (10) fist. r �• • „t►. VrAAt. xMillI11d accory boiittg rha11 be lied wlthln the errant *, half the lot. ; b. . Tim mint mum side yard for acc • ' wry building s1ta11 be M ire M foot. cI c.�CAW. The minimum rear yard for accesstal'huildinp shall be • �(3) feet.except when adjacent to,an equestrian trail whore the R �I setback shale be a Minimum of ten (10) feet. 7: hiviil�n�• A. Each,lot shalt provide behind the front setbeck line.a,minli num usable ., opea space area on the ground of twelve hundred (1200) square,feet with'•no dirnension'leas than 20 feet. I b. Private open space area shall not excFr- a ten (10) percent slope. 8. P841 $ utrerngnta. All developments shall meet the minimum offj4triet parkin standards of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Cade. In' , sition Ordinance to tree•parking pro isions 'contatned in the Huntington Beat* ce Code, the following shall apply: a A1,,'cwelling units.shall rn'tain s minimum.three (3) Fully enclosed spaces plus three (3) open spaces which maybe in tandem with the enclosed spaces. bI An additional parking.space which may..be-covered shall be provided , for each bedroom in excess of I:%ur (4) bedrooms. 9. l*Kgepxia6s• Developments on lots within-Final Tract Mops 11473, 4 1805, 11769, 13036,. 132101 shall be exempt from this subsection and subject to the requirements of their respective Conditl6nal Use Permit (see Appendix A) and appropriate provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, R1 ' zoning district. t } D. 'ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES The creation of an estate, equestrian theme and thil, maintenance of consistency in architectural character shall be addrCssed in the project design. 'In reviewing projects, the Planning Commission shall look for the following design features: 1. Street lights and street signs on collector and private residential streets and trail signs shall be consistent throughcut the Specific Plan area. 2. The use of natural building materials, textures and tones, such as rough wood siding and/or stonework shall be encouraged. 22 (0825D) oiy ,r' _v- 'tr ' - I Y •- °.r '1 , ' '' ter.. ' ,.,� , :• w ,ICE 3. Harts MtSm areas (walks, ds ivewsys, patto;i, etc.) ►hall be de Sned as an int4gral part of the architecture, ` 4. Roof WprQs should not be leaf than a 3 and 12 pitch. S- Roof flashing, rain gutters and downspouts, vents surd other roof protmWens are to be finished to match the adjacent material: and/or ;. colors. 6. Architectural screens other° than fences shall appear to to an extension of the struts sxW'desiaAd to croate exterW privacy, 7. tprotrusions such as,roof-mounted air conditioning units and solar collector panels, shall be located away from the entrance street frontage and screened from view of,su set rtghtt-of-way. e. Architectural planning site layout stio structure design shall take MI w advantage of passive energy efficiency features, such as natural heating and/or cooling, sun and wind exponure, and solar energy opportunities. 9. Accessary buildings shall be arch'ectOrally compatit,le In design and materials to the main residenti3i dwellinfir,unit. E. RESIDENTIAL, EQUESTRIAN FACILITIES The intent of this section is toiextablish 'tatWards for the stabling of horsesdin a manner whtzh will,not endangtir the health, peace, and safety of the community and which will assure that horses are;kept in a clean and sanitar~ condition. It is further the intention of this articWtti provide for the regular Inspection of horse facilities.to astir+ healthy stable mnnagemernt. 1. ~ uin+ St ►rdt Farr;:d y1di al Lam a.i No horse shall be kept, stabled or tethered on any parcel without prior appruvatl of a Use Permit subject to the sta Wards lfsted below, U. lm Lot %ze, No horsy 9MJI be kept, stabled of tethered on any parcel law than. 12,000 net square feet in area. C. bUmbar of Hat Cg.;,The fallowing number of horses may be-kept on an irWividual tesidential lot: 1MI Size. Max No. at HOrA" �r l 2,t»0`up to I41,999 sq ft. 1 l3,000 up to 19,999 sq.ft. ' 2 20,OGO up to 299999 sq.ft. :3 30,000 up.to 39,000, sq.ft. 4 r; 409000 sq.ft, or greater 6 In addition, immature offspring up to 12 months old may be kept on the tot. i 23 t25D) -`{•}hey.y,. ... M ! t, r , M r PT �MfsF'Y tl? Fh ti ,- d. XAft ..RMdMm.1wfit EW F&WD2,S=UM. The setback requirements shall pertain to all structures that relate to home kicluuding but not limited to stalls, corrals, arenas and fly-tight manure hint,•a=pt pastures or granting areas. Setbacks may be rfxkm +ad for equine strtu;turea and corral areas subject to findings and al t%0V I of a Usa Permit based upon proximity to trails and abutting rimidential uses. The following setback requirements for stables shall apply: (1) The front yard setback shall be a minimum of fifty (50) S (2) Intggigr Side, • The interior side yard setback shall be a minimum of twenty-five (25) fact; except minimum ten (10) feast when abutting an equestrian, open space or other similar easement. (3) Egt11rf1U_Si k* The exterior side yard setback shall be a minimum of fifteen (15) feet. (4) $gar. The rear yard 4e:tback shall be a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet,,:except minimum ten (10) feet when abutting an equest:hin, open space or other similar easement. (5) All paddocks and box stalls shall maintain a minimum distance of fifty (50) feet from any dwelling unit other than a unit ors'the subject property which is used for human habitation. e. C►=k. Each corral shall meet the following requirements: (1) The s;,ninimum size paddac.{c shall be Z88 square feet with a miniinum dimension of not less than twelve (12) feet and shall hav-4 a five (5) foot high fence. , (Z).: Each hcorse shall be provided with a rMfil' #*6f nihety�ix (96) sqi aee.feet of shelter covering •with a 'M nimnm -dimension of. rust li n 060 eight (8) feet. Shelters shall be sloped sway from c MTAls, or rain Iritters which lead tr 414 outslde of the corral shall be installed. :r• '(3) Each dmi al 'shsli be provided with"a'combination"anger and fear;and a' permanently`Installed ,rwater systetri with automatic drinking controls. (4) Corral'floors shall be graded to Woe away from the center or the corral. (5) 1h all enclosures where horses anti rmaintalned, the land surface of such enclosure, shall be graded above the remaining land surface so as to provide adequate`'drainage. 24 (08Z5D) r, 110 ���� Icy, ,.. , u ; �'•' ',i'.�'t+► ''°�:J , . 'im.�lj, AMN Stallions shall be maintained in a manner that will protect people and other animals. � UdLARbming toot the . A back iphaning devise ahsll,l installed to pro public water supply subject to the approval of the Department of Public Works, Water Division. h. FIX oul.Insect Cgntrttl.- Fly, and insect control shall be'di'llgently practiced. Rodsint control "11 be diligently pmfaticled and the: l ; entire prerrii8" #swell:be kept in.an orderly ab d sanitar ir.manor ,to s 1' p vegt p6 isible rodent infer tation. Thai followin8 guidelines�snd criteria shall be considered in reviewing plane$: (1) All dry grains shill"be stored in,rodent proof metal containers and hay shall be ktored in a'covered'structure: ql a cement slab or on a raised wood platfoi m that maintains a Ainhn»ro clearance of eighteen (18) inches above the ground. (2) Any tack equipment, device, subatance, or materiel shall-be stored on racks or shelves at least-"twelve (12) inches above the" fluor surface. Tack room floors shall maintain a minimum E ,r cle,arahco� of six (6) inches above the ground. J. Water Management. The following`guidelines are provided:,, (1) ' An automatic phut-o!'t` nanlaak valve for all;troughs, hol•�le, cups end other water sources shall be providied, (2) In'paddock and corrals, the owner shell properly gIraeee the earth surface to conform to the master drainage plar, so ,gnat rain water or water trough overflow does not form poNs. k. a fitrol. Continuous dust control of the entir a pre:Wses shall be . maintained and'subJect to applicable provisions of the,Huntftton 1kneh,Nh:rdeipal:Code. y The management or Horse fatalities`auh meet the requirements of the Orange County Health Department to keep environmental problems at a minimum. m. CMfknJ;. The responsible county agency, as designated in the Muntington Beach Municipal Code, vi hereby vested with the duty and Authority.to insWt regularly all 1xrae stables within the City. Report and recommendation by sur,h agency shall be forwarded to the Director of Community Development. 25 (082SD) •alp ''�! �: �', i ti F. OIL AC.rfVr= r i F 1. ��.osyti: uad operation, rewowking and/or redrilling of oil wells active at the time of adr9tion of this Specific Plan shall be permitted subject to ► applicable City regulations. 8. Gaijoline'powered engines on existing pumping units remulning in a • development shall be converted'to electric motors prior to occupancy of* the first unit. b. .,';'M'de+ eloper ShAll estAliah an inie:-est aripg'account prior �to i as dathifi of;the final ritap to ber administered by.the homeowner asrociation,to oover'the cost of landUcaping well sites at the time they are abandoned, `"The'amount of,the initial deposit shall be determined by the Director of Community Development. f; . 1. ke drilling and new storage tanks shall only be permitted In specified ulties or. "oil islands" as approved by Conditional Use Permit. The oil �operator shall awn or have a lease on subsur;ace ,minet�ai rightslcovering tin area of'a mIn`Imu n of twenty (20)'contigiuous acres within the Specific Plan baundarigs for"every cn oil island requested, Before z permit for new drilllnj i4 issued, tne;dd operator shall specify the exact location and sine.. of the-proposed all island (generally not to exceed :two,and one—half (2 112) acres in sine) subject to the approval of a. onditiona]. use hermit.; a. l~ancing'arpund'the perimeter`of all oil islands shall be set back twenty (fib),met froti: any arterial highway,P,r,internal c01lector street,and'fifteen (IS) feet from any;residential street, private farkbeaped rty'lino., or.common open space area. The setback area shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in the City's Oil .Code. G.' CrV1C n1STR1C'f The requirements of'the.civic district overlay shall apply to all'parcels located directly.adjacent to the Huntington;Central Park facility and shall comply with the provisions.contained itt the Huntington Brach Ordinance Code. Ho MISCIELLA14110US 1, Vehtoulat�Storatre. The covered storage of boats, trailera, recreational vehi its ar;other sirallar vehicles is-allowed only within the rear half of an ivtduel Yot;end is prohibiteid within any ysrd abutting a street right- twat'; no open storage is permitted No commercial oversize veWit tdrt special purpose machine shall be parked or stored in any portion of ark►yard area. Common areas for,storage of boats,,trailers, recreational vehicles and other titmlar vehicles may be provided for in the development plan. Where • such areas are provided, they shall be enclosed and screened from view on a horizontal place from adjacent areas by a conlbination'of six (6) foot high masonry wall and permanently maintained landscaped area. r 26 (0825D) �' 4 ri;,Wfi,°.R! �' 'l;,5•^' 1 '1 r:r , •fir , 1�1 � "` I• 1 / ' Ill• +I r1' biA.a ,' 1•I /' 1 ``jay,' g. 11MIWIngs 111bout a Main RullelluAr. It shall be unlawful to OOMtruct. erect or locate accessory buildings cm any lot riot having a permissible residential building except for commercial equestrian facilities. 3. Ljghft. The developer shall install an on—cite lighting system on all' vehinultu.ac s ways and along major walkways. Such lighting shall'be directed onto driveways and walkway* within the development and aiMay from adjacent properties. " 4.' AAjM.and/W1tU Syg%ima, Sewer and water systems shall be desloved to city standerdo and shall be located within streets, easements ,o, drives. no- -021ih ft ividija►1 sewer lines nr sewe'r'mains for a dwelling unit be p witted to extend underneath any ether dwelling unit. S. ' Fire HyAmat Sva.teio. r A fire hydrant system shall be installed to provide an adequate fire flow. I a. The fire hy&' ant system shell be dedicated to the City. Prll%ate ftre hydrants are prohibited. b. The adequacy of such system shall be approved by the. Fire'Marshal/ Flans shall. be submitted and approved prior to the issuance: of . building p�srrmits, and any fire hydrant system a!•iall sae in gperation prior to the time of construction_ with any combustible materiels. I ;V 6. . Where appropriate, the developer shall install onr site street fi rme signs at the.Inter'sect Ions of streets, as ap proved b�;'the Cato grwoe' er. All sigtrs required by this section shall be.1tutalled at approved locations prior to the time the first Aw' elling unit is occr�picd/ 7. Imis. 'preservation of existing trees shall be required whore.feasible. Any existing mature tree(s) that must be removed shall be roplacad at a 2:1 ratio with 36-inch box treat which shall be incorporated itito the project's landscaping+plan. .80, SlEoM. Alt.street improvements shall be completed prior to construction with comlititible materials. PIP,, �� t (1 rY � r ' 'S" �� � �, 1 ` a Y ` �,�• '. 11 �"'f��ir�',, + Y Moo Jy 1 e 1 V. APPENDICES VMLOPMENT STANDARDS FOR EXISTING SUBIMSIONS rv� tidy`' 11 •a T+ ?` r; � 1��1Rtl'.1rAf/I-" $44R��FR .+• 'I I ,+J ! , �i• 2 (08 i5 )) v , r , r i r r I, r APPENDEL A DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR TRACTS 11473, 11805, 11769!-, 1303 61, 13210 , umlt Ha j".a gQLC=djt1UQa1 Via Permit No. cal • '` wilding setbacks **thin the subdivision shall be as follows: 1. F ,j[ cU: 30 feot'or 25 perceri t cf the lot depth, whichever is creator,.but does not need to exceed 40 feet. �. i a thscks: An aggregate of 20 f"set with a minimum of 8 feet on a side. 3. hear Xard Sa : 25 feet 4, Haweves � if as-ccess>iory buildings sate constructed in the front one third (1/3),of the lot, they shall conf6rm with the setback requirements of the main dwelling. IZA02.1,12.62_and..r13. .(C dit ot,ialla..,�,e P'ujilt No. 8f.-63) - Central 2 Wool Building setr,jcks withlit the subdivision shall be as follows: SetbacU: 25 feet for front or aide loading garages. 2. I=lgt Si a Ya &t_Wngb: An aggregate of 15 Feet with a minimum of 5 feet on one side, provided further that the opposite side yard shall be 10 feet clear to thb slur. _...�..._ ., �U.tsu ._.,�' 3 Sri YB�C�d.,Sethi>irk on 1, Stre t. A S feat landscaped buffer area the11 bevc ,i adjacen*. to the equestrian trail. Structure,t shallbe setback ` 10 feet from, th,e•latxiscape buffer; 15 feet from the trail'. 40 i Yard Satbr,: 25 feet S. ahkk a E116 Aver: 25 feet measured from behind the 15 foot wide landscaped buffer. 6. All 60 i46�y build14-Ahall conform with the setback requirefi'Mentss bf the amalu'dwelling. 29 (0825D) •,, fit,, f•' 1 1 JbLd 13210 M"Itanal. Use paten Na. g7►-41 L.liliix i :tan beech Estates Wkft setbacks within the subdivision shall be as follows: 1. Front_ } : 25 feet for all structures 2, mar 31tie Ys „�et�: An aggregate of 15 feet clear to the sky with a minimum of 5 feet on one side. 2, A 5 foot landscaped buffer area shall be provided a0cent to the equeItHan trill'along a colhector street. Boraces shall be setback 10 feat from the landscape buffer; 15 feet from the trail. a. I&IMC_X ally: 25 feet for all structures 5, Iftar Ya k s1nat F-1I1a, nua: 2.5 feet measured from behind the 15 foot •aride landscaped. buffer. b. All accessory buildings shall conform with the setback requirements of the main dwelling, 7. Encroachment of architectural features into side yard setback areas shall be prohibited. $; Any development on Lot No. 1 shall have a first stoat setback of,25 feet and second story setback of'35 feet from Ahe southern property line. Southeast facing, secon6sti4y windows shall be frosted. Any variances to these requirements s'all be subject to revibw and approval by the planning Commission. 7. t is i i 30 (a825D) Rr, rr?,a .A� i r 1 Ad • JL 14 H+V , .,,I.5,.,•' , APPENDIX B DFSiGN GUIDELINES MESIGN GUIDELINES TO BE ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION AT A'LATER DATE AND INCORPORATi. HER MN) r, i I ri 1 i 31 (OSSD) fir,"•' N"b` REQUES FOR CITY COUNCIL. CTION Don May 1, 1989 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council �p Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, City Administrator-;< .. --. G&"C p+�r'ed b'1►• Mike Adams, Director Cow 'unity Development ���t/�►C ' r t� I F�1AI. £hM NMEATTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 88-2. 9, Cast with council Polky? ] yes [ j New Policy or Sxarptionn jig Shftawt of I=*, Recommendation, Anslysis, Funding Source, Alternethe Actions, Attsahmenb: i y Ftnal Environmental Impact Rerkwt No. 83-2 (FEIR) was prepared by STA Plannins, Inc., to analyze the potentially significant Impacts of the proposed Ellis-Coldnnwest Specific Plan zone change rt. The document roust be adopted and Certified prior to approval Of Zane Change Na 9-1 and any tentative tract or conditional use permit applications for the qwu twwtion area. i w p1s Com iui n Action and Reoo�n�neiWation Oil March 211 1989: At a regular meetin$ held of March 21, 1959,',and an a motion by Slates, seconded by Williams, the Plannin8 Comm' ission voted to certify as adequate FEIR No. 88-2 by adoptft P1ann14 CommiWon Rewluticn No. 1414 (see .Attachment 2, Planning CommUslan staff repart) and forward FEIR No. 88-2 to the City Council for their adoptim ant certification by the following vote: AYES:., Slates, William*, Bousgignon, Ortega, Mountford, Leipzig NOES:. Nous ' ABSENT: Kirkland Af1STAN.- Nana Stiff Staff candum with the Planning Commision and recommends that the'City Council adapt W`Oi irtil�r. aj adagate FEIR No.'W2 by adopting the attached C tuicil' Resolution (At it lun®nt Y), approve sa to form by the City Attorney, with Statement of Overt�iding 061dwi loot"bit-I), Statement of Flr fop and Facts in Support of Fi ndinp (EvbfMt C)0 and Revised Mitigation Measuraa (Exhibit A).mom 1 '1 .ur r w•La.J ' A. Requirement of an Environmental Impact Report In July. 19U, In roVatme to several tentative tract application received for the zllias- clsnrnest quartoarsecom Planning staff determined that an Environmental Impact Report tN►oM bt pdw to l of oW futme tracts. Qn September 20,19 tl1i1 t.�iaM�oanfirm this decision by can the Dahl Company's T6tatlw freft W Ia1or 13629 (for a five area tract within the gwrtearses don) until ptetiaaQ of the Draft Eft- ►ldoweet Specific Plan aged the soma 4mmyba EnvvirnruaseataI Impact Report. A. to Draft EIR No. 3S-2 (©IER) amend to Mitigation Measures prod by the dta�+aaaaerrt• I. Cha now made during the public review period. Duft the public review period for Draft EIR No. -20 the City received eighteen letters commenting an the document (see Appendix, FEIR No. 88-2, p+p, 2-40). As required by the California Envlra=ontal Quality Act, the Oty's , emrsultant ponded to these letters (Appendix, pip. 44-78). As a result of + these c*>mMents. several changes were made to the text of DEIR No. 88--2 and several mitiption measures were added to those originally proposed in the document. A summary of these changes and additions can be found in the Appendix of FEIR No. 88-2, pp. 83-7. 2. FIvai rg Commission and Staff charges. On March 21, 1989, as part of their action certifying FEIR No. 88 2,.the Flatvft Commission made several revislons'to the orlSinal mitigation measure proposed in the document. .Most of the changes raaulted from a agreed to clarify Wumfic measures or snake them emktent with do Ellis-4*11denwest Specific Plan ad with City policies. These cleanses are listed in the Appendix of FEIR No. U-2, pp* 97- 6 3. Charta W made since the cum of the public review period. Folio4,6* toe lie review period for DEIR. No. .88-2, oan.March 24, 1989, the City rwilved additiasal'comments from the California Department of Fish and C (Appendb4 pp. 41-43). As a matter of oartesy, staff accepted thae a n No th+e City,',: t�onudtant rapofided to•�thani,eppra�p�adtely (Apps><rdix, pppp�� ' . Two po�ragr�tpns;have been added to DEIR No. 3 it a rwfit of Fib Owtame'a hitter, geed is es ars'pm4did 1tt tba � of PER No. 3, p. no in ardagtioax,' fol mitlption bag act to t� re vlaed mitiptim.'tasa� zes proposed for` III'stdoptla+n: As future development oorura, if any div&mkxh obstruct of thin,"natural flow, or ]n the bed, charusel,;or bank-of mW river or strea rp is In by all"developments th# Department of Fish end Game doll be notifled (as required in Sect]crri ) 1 through 1603 of the Department of Fish and Came Code). 'this notifica 0m (with associated fee) shatll be d made after theappanvnl of tentative tract maps and prkr to issuance of V~ A • grading permits. RCA-*►/1/39 -2- (245M Now of the alteratkm to the taxi or to the mitigacion in DEIR No. 83--2 result in a c#wo to Ow omiusk m of the dmument. The cl wWn to the text and mitigation maaatwr In DEIR No. W2, atang with the comments received and responses sent, booms ties awpondix to the oriel text and mitigation; together, DEIR No. W2 and the x meta up FEIR No. W2. in i raoa with do California Enviroamental Quality Act (CEQA), OR No, W2 was prgpargd to erMd�me the po wtial impacts of the p gvsed E1114'40we awest Spodfic Plan r as h. Tho re*Mte procotms that was followed 1s outlinod below: 1. Notice of Preparation posted, adverittsed and circulated December 16, 1989. 2. First puttlic meeting with Planning Commission wbcommittee held January 26, 1989. t 3. Notice of Completion of OUR No. 88-2 posted, advertised and circulated February 3, 1989. 4. Copies of DEIR No. W2 an forwarded to Planning Commission February 3, 1989. S. DEIR No. 88-2 is made available for public review and comment February 3 to March 20, 1989. 6. Second public meeting with planning Commission subcommittee held February 13, 1989. 7. Ph=ft Commission stuffy session held March 7, 1989. A. Initial cotaxants died regime to comments on DEIR No. 28-2 forwarded to Planning Commission members in packet for March 21, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. 9. Additional Comments received between Mph '16 and March 20 and response to commmnts on DEIR No. 88-2 forwarded to Planning Commission members at March 21, 1989, Planning Commission meeting. 10. All c assnts and response to comments received during DEIR No, 89-2 review period made available td public March 21, 1989, at close of review period. 11. Public 1handiang held by Planning Camion an March 21, 1989. Planning Commission recomm mtu certification of FEIR No. W2 by adopting Resolution No. 1414. 12. Caples of DEIR ft U-2 forwarded to City Council members March 24, 1989. 13. n iai'.�of FEIR No. W2, Inclurlisg all comments and responses to comments on IVo: W2, forwarded to City Cowncil April 20, 1989. Final Environmental Implact Report No. 88-2 discussed potential adverse impacts in the arelt•af tared note, aeat'b6tia, traffic/circulation, air quality, nuise,.1WdroloRy/drainarge, geoioarl n eokir, btokW/plant life, population, ail facilities, equestrian fadlitiea, light and glare, and public so-AeWutilities. The direct, indirect and cumulative impacts of the propml are addressed, as well as the Impacts of project alternatives. For a mzre detailed discussion of impacts (project-specific and cumulative) And Pro se,t alternatives, plea sc* Attachment 2, planning Commission staff report, frill.I'll, 1989. RCA - S✓ M -3- (2459d) Thr+ao ► ttii use of app�apr�iate mitigation measures identified In the FEIR9 the M& ty at tin ly adverse impacts associated with the project can be reduced to level of irrs oatece. Thm impacts are listed in Sections 6.1 and 6.2 of the DEIR (pp. 194-5). There we. however, some siodficant impacts anticipated from the Implementation of the fle Plan that calnWtbtn� ti ted to a level of insignificance. Thee impacts are l is Seetian 6.3 of On b= . 185) and include significant mitigable Impacts In the Mo of land use, aeatttles, tray c/rirculation, noise, hydrology/drainage, equestrian Wb eW water supply. Each of the affects is lessened by the mitigation measures lh do , which an recommended by the Planning Commission and staff to tad into fhtuurus projects, bct' ;rivate and public, in the quartersection. C i�an A guidelines See 1S090 requires that In certifying an EIR, a .Lead Agency must find that the final EIR had been completed in compliance with CEQA, that the EIR was led to the decisions-t asking body of the Lead Agency, and that the decision-making 6eviewod annd c Wdered the Information contained in the final EIR prior to appr wft the project. Finditnas anal Fide ie Ste„ fo, FindI CEQA Guidelln"Section 1 091 require: that prior to a public agency approving or carrs►lnig out a project or request for which an EIR had been completed and identified one or UK" sigstffica nt envirmmental Impacts, the public agM►cy must make one or more written f%dinp for each of those significant effects. CEQA requires that these findings must be supported by substantial evidence. A Statement of Findings and Facts in Support of Finditngrt ;r therf�dficant effects identified in FOR No. 58�-2 can be found in Alta t 16p�Mftq 'Exhibit C. and arse iterated into City Council Resolution No. as port of the C tif'ication of FEIR No. W2. In addition, C2QA requires dint when a project had been Idenrifiad as having significant too" which caMidt be ro&csd to a level of UvAgnificance through mitigation measures, a tt t meat of Overriding aoris km must be tzadm In this statemento the City CMW11 Must find that the *aom, w10 and eadal bawflts of the p vpowW p ct outweigh the prgjeet s-potentially aelvs� i A ststoumt•of awerriding �sAIJIM Onions is tamed in Attachment No. 1, �a NWi . In that statement, the reasons for deteeMning that the rematila adverse impacts are "acceptable", given off-setting project bensfits, are NOW- On ,taanrrlr 1, 1989, Assam* Bill 3180 ocame law In California. Tire bill twpires all public ag braises to adopt maidu ring and resting programs when they approve projects subject to entvi +oammul Impect r qmm (EIRs) or negative declarations. A 'list of all of the mitigatlan measures identified In FEIR No. 0$-2 aMli ecCempany all development entitlements, and "I became conditions of approval as upprapriste an all tract maps and rwdltional use permits. Staff smell prepare a mitijptiot manitaring prop m for each pro , private or public, in the Ellin-Goldenwest quactersection in order to.enwre compliance with mitigation messuw. Tract map and coalitional use permit priming may irnclude a special fee to mver mitigation monitoring. RCA - 5/1/" -4- (2459d) ''1ryyyYR // 1.M 1 Rr • fF`s oo i N t 1. 1krw t4 "-- I'I�ati�1 and aftd n by resolution, the City Council may amand (add to or delow ftW ter document *btit;h staff baa prepared as FEIR No. W2. it ahoWd be notad. wt� that r moval air of the ivwmmeaded midptk a meawte will In the rcadolow at -W xi will "qudre dwment f�1ie mow. L The City Cecil may doW certification of FOR No. W2 with finding. �F. 1. Ciiy CAS XMIUtiva No. with Revised Mitiption Meares {Exhibit A)� men Over dons (Exhibit 8), and Statement of lrindiap and Facia to Support art I�i� (Exhibit Q. Z. F C:otnroi iori staff report from March Zlrt public hearing with attachments PlaWns Commtedm Resolution No. 1414, Statement of Ovorrkling Cctaside<atkm (No. 14)9 add Statement of Finding and Facto in Sit of Firrdinga Oft 3)• Kld:Ib w KCA - S/1JS9 -5- (24590 i JJ� } ATTACID&ENT I City Council Resolution No. • Reviud Mitigation Measures Statement of Overriding Consideration Statement of Findings and Facts in Support of Findings ' :rti ,i :.ide.di5•: ,•_ Lam. .1 sY:.',.a..�11►. ,'3�L„r, .l✓,i..:r }S.a.aL 11 �. l��,t IN.Y.._%iY_. J. .' Je11f►diu Y ! ...,. Y 1 JV.. ,. 4 f Wl. ,��,�`1 1 I AT'TACIb(ENT z Planning Commission Stuff Report March 21, 1989 Ck 1' lei E huntington bur ach depot;tment of community development STAfi ..4R E P 0 R T�— TO : Planning Commission FROM: Community Development DATE: March 21, 1989 SUBJECT: DRAFT ENVIRONMZNTAL IMP)%CT REPORT NO. 88-2 FOR THE PROPOSED ELLIS--COLDENWEST SPECIFIC PLAN ZONE CHANCE NO. 89-1 APPLICANTS : City of Huntington Beach/Dahl Gi .1Wesco REQUEST: Review and take action on Draft wnvironmental Impact Report No . 88-2 .1_ _Q SUQQ STEQ ACTrON: Adopt and certify as adequate Draft Environmental Impact Report No . 88-2 (DEIR No . 88-2) by adopting attached Planning Commission Resolution No . 1414 with Statement of Overriding Considerations and forward DEIR No. 88--2 to the City Council for their adoption and certification. 2 . 0 BACKQR�pT1I�.IidEQFM.TIQN: In July, 1988, in response to several tentative tract applications received for the Ellis.-doidenwest quartersection, planning staff determined that an Environmental impact Report would be required prier to approval of any future tracts . On September 20 , 19881 Planning Commission confirmed this decision by continuing the Dahl. Company' s Tentative Tract Map Application No. 13629 .(for a five acre tract withf,n the quartersection) until corop3stion of the Draft Ellis-Goldunweet Specific Plan and the accompanying Lnvironmental Impact Report. D212 No. 88-r2, once certified, is intended to be utilised for the aforementioned Ellis-Coldenweat Specific plan zone change. california . Znv.irn ntA1 Quality &t proceae In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) , DPIR No. 88-2 was prepared to analyse the potential impacts of the proposed Rllis-Goldenwest Specific Plan zone change . The requisite procedure that was followed is outlined below: 1 . 140tiae of Preparation posted, advertised and circulated Uecember. 14, 1988, Do* I AdM6 A-r M{3C r I 2 . Notice of Completion of DEIR No . 88--2 posted , advertised and circulated February 3 , 1989 . 3 . DEIR No . 88-2 available for uublic review and comr,ient February 3 to Larch 20, 1999 . 9 . Copies of DEIR No . 88-2 are forwarded to Planning C.ommissiozr February 3 , 1989 . 5 . initial commenta and response to comments on DEIR No . 88-2 forwarded to Planning Commission members in packet for March 20t 1989 Planning Commission meeting . Additionsl comments and responses to comment an DEIR No 88-2 will be forwarded to Planning Commission at March 20 , 1989 Planning Commission meeting. 3.9 1 S SIZES AHp BNALYs;1a Draft Environmental Impact Report No . 88-2 was prepared by STA Planning , Inc . to analyze the potentially significant impacts of the Draft Ellis-Coldenwest Specific Plan zone change request . The document must be adopted and certified prior. to any action on Zone Changer No . 89-1 or any tentati•ye tract or conditional use permit applications for the quarterrsection area . The environmental impact report discusses potential adverse impacts in the areas of land use, aesthetics , traffic/circulation, air quality, noise, hydrology/drainage, geology/soils, archaeology, biology/plant life, populAtion, oil facilities, equestrian, light and glare, and public services/utilities . The direct, indirect and cumulative impacts of the proposal are addressed, as are the impacts of project alternatives , IMUMIDAHU SIGNrFICANT IMPACTS Through that use of appropriate mitigation measures identified in the SIR, the majority of potentially adverse impacts associated with the project can be reduced to a level of insignificance . There are, 'F however, some significant impacts anticipated from the impleraentotion of the Specific Plan that rar.aot be mitigated to a level of insignificance. These impacts are summarized in the following paragraphs . Land, Usis Approval ol the zone change will allow for the conversion of 160 acres of lar.6 to residential-equestrian and ail prodluaing uses which will result in a greater degree of development than what is presently existing . This conversion, in conjunction with other part, present and ressonably, foreseeable future projects in the area, will contribute to a cumulative impact upon the conversion of land to urbanized uses. r�: Staff Report 2/21/89 -2- (2241d) Several mitigation measures are proposed within the EIR to reduce the impact of increased urbanization . Even with mitigation, however , this impact cannot be mitigated to a level of insignificance and remains a significant unavoidable impact . M thetic The 160-acre project site is a large open area with gently rolling terrain. The on-site vegetation consists of brush and grass with a few scattered trees . One large cluster of Eucalyptus trees is located in the central portion of the site. The general overall appearance of the area is of small hills and ravines covered with disturbed vegetation . Development of the project site will alter the existing visual environment of the area . Grading activities associated with construction of on-bite roadways and preparation of future building pads will be required for a great majority of the site . Existing and futures project site residents , particularly those in the first tract developments , will view construction activities and land with all vegetation removed during the grading phases of development . This impact will occur during the duration of grading activities . This impact will gradually change as the public perception of the area becomes one of a mature residential community. Although mitigation measures have been suggested to minimize this impact , it should be considered as a short-term unavoidable effect of the project . The impact is not a long-term unavoidable adverse impact . Iroff iC1Qrr.ulat.i.qn In the case of traffic/circulation impacts, level of significance is determined by the "Level of Service" (LOS) predicted by the traffic study. Levels of Service range: from A through F, representing the traffic quality From optimal operating conditions with little or no delay to motorists (LOS A) , to a condition where the number of vehicles exceeds the capacity of the facility. LOS C or better is considered acceptable by the City. LOS D or lower is not considered satisfactory and results in significant unavoidable impacts to circulation. Development of the 160--acre quartersection at the Specific plan density of 3 dwelling units per acre is expected to generate approximately 5, 300 average daily tr•1ps (ADT' s) . Implementation of the mitigation measures suggested in the EIR will reduce the project-specific and cumulative impacts resulting from the project to a level of insignificance with the exception of one intersection. Yorktown AvenueJGol.denweht Street will have LOS D. This impact will not be mitigated to a level of insignificance with implementation of the proposed improvements . Although the project 's contribution to this cumulative impact is not considered a significant contribution, the cumulative impact remains significant and unavoidable . Staff Report 3/21/89 �3- (2241d) (l •11 A. Construction Noise Construction noise will occur as a result of the development of the project area ; and with projects of this magnitude, the potential noise impacts are considered to be significant . Construction noise represents a short--term impact on ambient noise levels , Noise generated by construction equipment: and activities can reach high levels . During the early stages of construction of :A project , piles will be driven into the ground as part of the foundation structure . Noise associated with this activity, though of short-term duration, is considered significant . The most Effective method for containing construction noise is through local control of construction hours . The City of Huntington Beach as part of its Noise Ordinance has adopted limits on the hours of construction and excavation work. While this prevents construction noise from occurring between 8 : 00 PM and 7 : 00 AM, Monday through Saturday, and all day on Sundays and Federal holidays , it does not mitigate noise impacts occurring during allowed hours . Project-specific short--tarty impacts xelated to noise generated by construction activities Can be lessened and restricted to hours acceptable to the City of Huntington Beach . These impacts cannot be mitigated to a level of insignificance . B. Helicopter Noise The Huntington Beach Police Department currently has a helipad located on the west side of Gothard: Street, near the intersection of Gothard and MountJoy. Future residents of the site, especially those located in the southeastern portion of the quartersection, will be subject to periodic helicopter noise due to operations at the nearby police heliport . Helicopter overflight is an existing condition. The proposed project does not affect this activity . By 19901 these operations are expected to occur up to 1.4 times a day (N alf occurring during the day, half at right) as helicopters take ofi".0rom the facility. These noise events may be considered annul;.nq by residents on-site; noise levels, during the event, may exceaed,,,`ity noise standards . Mitigation is proposed to assure that potenti'a. `-:future homeowners are made aware of this situation. Project-819cific impacts are lessened but cannot be mitigated to a level of insignificance. gy4XgJI2WDrainaee Storowater runoff currently flogs from the project area by way of existing natural ravines . The project vicinity is traversed by two ravines and drains in a north and northeasterly direction into Huntington and Sully Miller lakes . r Ct Staff Report - 3/22/89 -4- (2241d) L i Development of the proposed project area will increase the amount of impervious surface (concrete, asphal '.- , rooftops , etc . ) . This will increase the amount of stormwater runoff . According to the Public Works Department , hydrology studies have not b.-en prepared for the project area ; therefore, the amount of runoff from the project area is speculative at this time . Mitigation measures require precise hydrologic and drainage studies to address impacts of runoff, siltation, water quality, erosion, downstream xeceptors, and increased water volumes and runoff flow speed. Dependent on the findings of these studios and the feasibility of implementation of mitigation programs , th3 resultant impacts would range from unavoidably significant to insignificant . At this time, without the conclusions of detailed hydrologic and drainage studies for the entire quartersection, project-specific and cumulative impacts are considered potentially significant . f; Eagentrian In 1972 within the Cityof Huntington Beach, there were 5 stables 9 C , 3 'i housing a total of 625 horses . This included private and boarding stables . In 1974 the Huntington Beach Equestrian Use Study indicated there were an eaLimated 700 to 800 horses but that private stables were declining . In the past, several ntables existed within and adjacent to the quartersection: Fox Meadow Stables; four Seasons Farms and Stables; Horsevorld Stables (now Huntington Crest Stables) ; and Gold Bar and Marion Stables , The elimination of Fox Meadow Statoles and Four Seasons Farms Stables created a major shortage of commercial stable facilities in Huntington Beach. 'chose boarders who could not find vacancies at Ocean View Stables were forced to move their horses as far as Laguna Beach and other surrounding areas to find adequate boarding facilities . ocean View Stables, formerly located on Edwards street in the quartersection, was closed down in February 1989 . There are three stables currently operating in Huntington Beach , Two are located within the project area . Smoky' s Stables is located the farthest from the project Area near the intersection of Bolsa Chic& Road and Warner Avenue. , The Huntington Central Park Stables is the largest of the three stables and is located just north of the Quartersection along Goloonwest Street . The Huntington Crest i Stablec are located on the corner of Ellis Avenue and Goldenwest Street within ..the project area . A. Impacts - County ' Development of the: proposed project will aventuallIr eliminate the remaining currently operating commercial on-site stable in the quartersection. This impact will increase demands upon existing County egoist=ian facilitiee to accommodate the displaced .,horass. This long-term impact is significant and cannot be lessened by mitigation. Staff Deport - 3/'21/89 -5- (I241d) B . Impacts -- City Four different scenarios were discusser) within the equestrian section of DEIR No . 88-2 regarding the proposal of a five-acro equestrian Facility within the quartersertion . Scenarios 1 and 4 were found to have significant unavoidable impacts associated with them. Scenario 1 : The proposed five-.acre facility will be restricted to exclusive private use by homeowners and will not accommodate displaced horses from public stables . Scenario 4 : The proposed five-acre facility would not be implemented . This scenario represents a "worse case" situation for the displaced horses . 1) Scenario 1 If this scenario were to occur, the proposed five acre stable would accommodate 150 horses exclusively for adjacent homeowners within the quartersection . It would not operate as a commercial stable . It is anticipated that both of the on-site stables will be eliminated , displacing approximately 148 horses . This scenario if implemented would creat.*i a project-specific impact because the new facility will only accommodate horses belonging to homeowners . No impacts are anticipated upon horses boarde3 by homeowners . However, there are currently a significant number of horses boarded in the existing stables by residents living outsida the q;:.srtereection . There in a possibility that this privates facility may sublease unused portions of its boarding facilities to outside patrons , but this option is speculative at this time. If this scenario j were implemented , it wiii have significant adverse impacts upon City-wide and County boarding facilities as it would incrementally contribilte to a loss of commercial equestrian recreational facilit~.es. 2) Scenario 4 If thf,s scenario were to occur, ti 'a five acre parcel of land mould not be purchased within the`. quartersection and the . . equestrian facility could not be ,implemented . Any foots already paid or to be paid in the future 'by developers could be used for the development or maintenan6e `;of public park facilities within the City. Under this worst 'case sceenario, both of the on-site stable$ will be eliminated, displacing approximately 148 horses . With no now facility to house the displaced horses, implementation of this scenario would create project-specific and cumulative impacts related to equestrian facilities . 4 . 47 Staff Report - 3/21/89 -6- (2241d) �M C . impacts - Cumulative In addition to the three significant unavoidable impacts identified above, a cumulative impact was identified in DEIR No. 88-2 . The proposed project in conjunction with other past, present and reasonably foreseeable projects within Orange Coiinty will contribute to the loss of stables and existing support/use areas . Implementation of the project which at worst case would include the elimination of two stables (approximately 148 horses) will incrementally add to the cumulative impacts associated with the Cottnty wide stable closures . This impact is considered significant and cannot be mitigated to a :level of insignificance . �11A�'.19E� The City of Huntington Beach water: supply is derived from two primary sources : Imported water from the Metropolitan Water District of !Southern California and groundwater from the orange County Groundwater Basin . On an annual average , the Water Division obtains 70 percent of its water from the nine City wells and imports 30 percent of its water vie the Metropolitan Water District (MWD) system. The Water Division maintains emergency connections with the City of fountain valley, Westminster , and Seal Beach . Additional supplies of water are not probable in the near future . The City ' s present inflow capacity to the water system is not sufficient to meet existing peak hour demands . The present maximum operating capacity of the system is approximately 72 , 700 gallons per minute (gpm) . With existing peak hour demand at approximately 90, 400 gpm there exists a deficiency of 17 , 700 gpm (at peak hour demand) . (Presently under peak hour conditions , the City cannot deliver sufficient water. There exists a need for the City to increrase, flop input to Cie system either from additional source capacity (groundwater or ',imported water capacity) or storage and booming facilities or bth. Approximately 192 gallons per minute will be utilized by the proposed project . Planning for water service to the project site by the City Water Deportment in the Water System Master Plan was based on buildo►ut at the density established by the existing zoning plans . The proposed Specific Plan zoning (up to 3 DU/acre overall) is at a higher density than the existing zoning (1 DU/acre) . Buildout under the proposed Specific Flan may impact the level of iervice and availability of water supply to the Reservoir Hill area . Development of the proposed project should occur concurrently with development of tho grater system to allow for adequate water service to the site. With them implanntaticn of suggested mitigation measures, pro jsct-spircif is impacts to water services can be mitigated to a level of insignificance. The project in conjunction with past, present, and foreseeable projects will contributes to a 'isu6ulative impact on water supply in the area. if mitigation messurers contained herein are implemented, this project ' s Staff Report - 3/21/80 -7- (2241d) • S i contribution will be reduced significantly . But the cumulative impact is still considered an unavoidable adverse impact on water supplieef .. 021JEitAL CQN FB�Ifi: The following are areas of general concern where impacts have been noted but have been reduced to insignificant levels through mitigation measures . I Roadways utilized by the development include Ellis Avenue, Garfield Avenue, Edwards Street , and Goldenwest Street . Existing controls for the adjacent roadways intersection c ] include: STOP signs at the intersections of Edwards Street/Garfield Avenue and Ellis Avenue/Edwards Street ; traffic: signals at the intersections of Ellis Avrc,,.te/doldenwest Street and Garfield Avenue/Goldenwest Street . Ymplomentation of mitigation measures, which include construction of Ellis Avenue, Goldenwest Street and Garfield Avenue to their ultimate half--section width as primary arterials , construction of Edwards Streit to its ultimate half-eection as a secondary arterial, and continuing analysis of the intersections of Edwards Street with Ellis and Garfield Avenues to identify the need for traffic signals, result in the reduction of traffic impacts to a level of insignificance with the exception of one intersection (see discussion under significant unavoidable adverst impacts) . Given a density of 3 unites per acre for the quartersection, it is estimated within nEIR po. 88-2 that the project will add approximately, 5 , 340 trips per day to adjacent streets . Using similar methodology to that employed in the traffic study, a typical single family residential development (6 units/acre) would produce over 11400 average daily trips . The lower density required by the Specific Plan helps to limit the traffic impacts that will be experienced in the area. The project, in combination with other past , present and xsesonably f6 reseeable proJecte, will create an increase in traffic congestion in the City of Huntington Beach. The project 's contribution to this cumulative impact is not considered. significant . R Two natural swales traverse the quartersection. They are a unique topographic feateire •'of this area . The Allis-Goldenwest pecific Plan calls out for their presentation by disallowing development within them. Mitigation measurers reiterate this requirement as well as require tbet matuxal swales be shown on grading plans so that they may be protected. nE1R No. 88-2 called out potentially significant impacts to the •swele Aft lat;d user aesthetics and hydrology/drainage. These potentiallyijsignlficent impacts were reduced to a level of insignificance through mitigation prescribed In each of these sections . ! t jStaff Report - 3/21/39 -g- (224 2d) f , Archaeplogy Within the immediate vicinity of the quartersection, there are five recorded archaeological deposits , one of which actually includes a burial site . The presenceof a great many archaeological sites in the immediate project vicinity demonstrates that the quartersection is within a zone of very high archaeological sensitivity. Buildout of the quartersection without provision for appropriate measures for tenting and excavation of artifacts will result in the destruction of potentially significant archaeological resources . Impacts to archaeological resources would result from grading , road construction, and underground utility placement . The construction of homes will. increase tho population and removal of oil field security will make the area more 3ecessible . The result will be graatly increased foot and eque, ,.rian traffic in the area , leading to inadvertent damage and illegal collecting of artifacts . It is anticipated these direct impacts could damage significant archaeological resources . Extensive mitigation is provided within DEIR No. 88-2 to reduce the level of impacts from development . These measurec include ; • Monitoring of all future ground disturbing activities within the area by a qualified archaeologist . • Requirement that the three on-site deposits of shell and lithic material identified within the quartersection be subjected to test excavations prior to any grading on the sites . . Requirement that arrchnsological site CA-Ora -365 (the portion v.hich falls within the quartersection) be subjected to test excavation prior~ to any grading on the site . • Requirements for test excavation prior to grading on archaeological sites within the direct vicinity of the project (CA-0ra-82, 881 364 , 365) . Implementation of the proposed Specific Plan will result in project-specific impacts to archaeological resources from grading, road construction and underground utility placement . Ympacts are not considered significant after mitigation. In addition, implementation will , in conjunction with other past, j present and reasonably foreseeable future projects, contribute to the cuniulatirver loss of potentially significant archaeological resources. with mitigation measures, this potential impact is reduced to d level of insignificance. ail�'aci1tiea There are a total of 112 oil wells existing within the , f , quartersection. of this total 60 are producing wells, 5d are abandoned wells , and 2 are injection wells . D.- I w . 470 Staff Report - 3/21/89 -9- (2241d) c i It is likely that upon adoption of the Specific Plan for the project � site, operating oil aells on-site will be gradually phased out . This phasing out will occur over a peril--'. of time as the site is developed with residential units . Thia means existing and now homes on-site will be in proximity to operating oil wells . Development of residential dwellings ai,ongst operating oil wells can result in several potential impacts . These impacts can include ' structural hazards from oil field subsidence, accumulation. of methane gage, fire incidents, oil spills, , .:her safety hazards to nearby residents , as well as noise and aesthetic impacts , With the implementation of mitigation measures , including those shown below, potentially significant; impacts are reduced to a level of insignificance . Strict compliances with City Fire Department and Division of Oil and Gas Standards . Requirement that residences be oriented away from the view shed of adjacent oil wells and tanks . Requirement of acoustical analyses of individual tracts prior to tentative tract map app r6va1, resulting in a tract design that addresses oil facilities-related noise impacts . Mauantgian The implementation. of the Specific Plan will increase tha potential for several site-specific impacts to occur within the quartersection. Impacts associated with manure removal, rodent control. , water management and dust control will occur with the introduction of a greater concentration of residences in an area occupied by horse facilities. A number of mitigation measures gleaned from existing equestrian/ residential developments in Orange County and required by DEER No. 88-2 mill reduce site--specific impacts to a level of insignificance. An required by Section 15126(d) of the CEQA Guidelines , 2.1ternatives to the proposed sono' change are discussed in DEIR No, 88-2 . D82R No. 88-2 evaluated three alternatives to the proposed project. In addition to., the mandatory "no project" alternative, a reduced IdeNsitr alternative end an alternative location for the 160-acre estate residential development were analyzed . .u, q . 71 R, Staff Report - 3/21/89 _10-- (2241d) aim I 110 Projectao Development The No project;/No Development alternative would retain the site in its existing condition and assure no further development to the site. In general, this alternative would be environmentally superior to the proposed project . It would continua the existing land uses within the project plan area . Impacts associated with lend use, aesthetics , traffic/circulation, noise, air quality, population , oil facilities , equestrian , geology/soils , hydrology/drainage, aesthetics, biology/plant life , light and glare , archaeology and public services and utilities would remain at current levels and impacts would be less than buildout of the proposed project. Overall, this alternative is considered environmentally superior to the proposed project and should remain under consideration during the public review process . Reduced benssity The Reduced Density alternative assumes development of the project site under the existing zoning designations . The majority of the site currently maintains zoning designations of Residential Agricultural District/Oil Production (RA-0) and Residential Agricultural District/Oil Production/Civic District (RA-0-CD) . Under the provisions of the RA-O-CD Zoniag District, one residential dwelling unit is permitted per acre concurrent with oil production � (except for the drilling or new wells) and the Civic District suffix requirements . Under this alternative, a total of 160 dwelling units could be built, 440 less than maximum buildout under the existing General Plan, and 320 less than the proosed Zone Change/Specific Plan . This alternative represents development that is approximately seventy percent less than maximum possible buildout . impacts associated with traffic, aesthetics, hydrology/drain6ge, population, public services and utilities , oil production, light: and glare, and noise woul3 be less than the proposed project . Decreases in these impacts could be substantial with a development of this size. Impacts associated with biology/plant life, archaeology, and geology/soils are considered similar to the proposed project . Impacts associated with land use plans and policies would be greater then the proposed project . This alternative is not consistent with the General Plan designations for the subject site (Estate Residential 3-4 dwellings per acre) . It would also not carry out the objectives of the Specific Plan which plans for an overall density of 3 dwellings units per acre. Current on-site residences are developed with .3 dwelling units per acre. Development under this alternative would be inconsistent with ezissting residences both on-site and adjacent to the sits. Staff Report - 3/21/89 -11- (2241d) i Both project-specific and cuimllarive impacts upon equestrian feci. liLles (CitS, and County) could be greater: with this alternative. Th, re would not: be the provision of equestrian lots for the boarding of horses an with the proposed Plan, and it is assumed that buildout under the existing zoning de,,--.ignaLicns would still displace the ors--kite stables which hougr 148 hrrses . Although this alternative does not satisfy the project objectives of the applicant nor the land use and housing objectives of the City ` s General Plan, it is considered environmentally superior to the proposed project because of the reduction in other impacts And should remain .endear consideration during the review period . Alternative Locations Four sites were analyzed as alternative locationa for the Specific Plan : Meadowlark Golf Course , Meadowlark Airport, Balsa Chica, and the Holly-Seacliff area . All but the Holly--Se acliff alternatives were dismissed after preliminary study because of various constraints associated with the sites . i Impacts associated with aesthetic:_,, traffic, noise, geology./sails, archaeology, biology/plant life, population, public services and utilities, oil facilities , equestrian, and light and glare from Holly--SO&Cliff alternative location would be similar to the proposed project. impacts associated with hydrology/drainage and land use would be greater than the proposed project . This alternative project site drains into the Bolsa Chica wetlands area (the proposed project does not drain into Balsa Chica) . This alternative is not considered environmentally aupearior to the proposed project and should not remain under consideration during the review period. Additionally, this alternative location mar not satisfy the project objectives of the applicants nor the land une and housing objectives of the City` s General plan. APPRQY& 0l` THE PROPOSED PR!DJ=: �g�tifi.e:atio�of thea EAR CEQA Guidelines section 15090 requires that in certifying a:e EiR, a Lead Agency must find that the final EIR has been completed in CoMplianee with CEQA, that the F.IR was presented to the decision-making body of the Lead Agency, and that the d6cision-snaking body reevie steed and considered the i'a forr;akion ` contained in the final Lilt prior to approving the project. Fi. Adinesa ,and.-Enctj JJ1..$Uajjart gf Einflings CSQA Guidelines Section 15091 requires that prier to a public agehcy approving or-,carrying out a project for which an ElR has been completed and identifies one or more significant environmental impacts, the public . sg+ency must make one or more wtitt:een► findings L13 Staff Report 3/21/69 -12- (2241d) f for each ct those :i qn� icant effects . Cl3Qh. requires that lhf3c;e tindings must be supported by substantial evidence . Vindings �,nd facts In :stapport of: findings, regarding the ;significant effect,,; identified in DEIR 88-2 are listed in detail in Attachment 3 of this staff r-nportr and Eire, incor,. orated :into Plana4 ng Co►k1►7ii ' 011 Resolution 143.4 ns part of t1le Certification of D ITZ No , 88-2 . I►A addition, CEQA requires :.hat when a project has been ident lLfi.ed as having significant impacts which cannot be reduced to a level of insinni.ficance through mit:igaLion measures , a statenunnL of overriding considerations must be made . It,., this staLe►nent , the Planning Commission aria City Council must find that: the economic and social benef lf-s of the proposed project: outweigh the pro- Ject ' a potentially adverse impacts . A statement of overriding consideration is found in Attachment No . 4 , Exhibit D, of thin staff report . In that statement, reasons for determining that the remaining ;adverse impacts are " acceptable" , given off--setting project benefits , is discussed . A list of ali of the mitigation measures identified in EIR No . 88-2 shall accompany all development entitlements , and shall become conditions of approval as appropriate or. all tract maps and conditional use permits . Staff shall prepare a mitigation monitoring program to be applied to the Ellin-Goldenwent araa in order to ensure compliance with mitigation measures . Tract Map and Conditional Use Permit rrocessing may include a special fee to cover mitigation monitoring . 9 - ,_RCOMEXPsATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt and certify as adequate DEIR 88-2 by adopting planning Commission Resolution No . 1414 with Statement of Overriding Considerations , and forward DEIR Z18-2 to the City Council for their adoption and certification with the following findings and mitigation measures . FINDI Nth-E0 QV-1BM1FMQ&U9 N._--_ DEIR g 8-2 : 1 . DEIR 88-2 has been completed in compliance with the California i Environmental Quality Act as amended June 1986 , and all State and local guidelines therefore . 2 . DEIR 88-2. adequately addresses the potential environmental impacts that may be associated with the Ellis--Goldenwest- Specific }flan zone change and is found to he certifiable . 3 . EIR No. 88-2 was presented to the Planning Commission and the Planning Commission reviewed and considered the information contained in the final EIR prior to approving the project , Di Staff Report - 3/21/89 -13- (2241d) 1; f 4 . Fitidi 7cjN ariia Facts in Support of: Findingt: have been mado for all significant: effect- , Went.ified ir.. DEIR No . 88-2 . 5 A stat:e.rirint: uf: raver:ri ding Consideration.,; is being xade 15 the economic f:nd social benefi-ts or the pi:uposed Ellis-Goldenwest Gjec:i.fic Man lone chang-.! out:w(A.gh Uie zone. change ' s 1,navoidable adverse impacts . 1 . MitigEltiorl Measurers required in DEIR No . 88--2 2 . t~ rat:a Shne t:s for DEER .4 . Staternent of Findings and Facts 4 . Planning Commission Resolution, No . 1414 and Statement of Overriding Considerations SP. :RW: kia Staff Report w 3/21/89 -•14- (2241d) 'l! one" S 4 ' ATTACHMENT 1 Nsl•rr .9�'I4L�1 A�IJ_i�1 iA 1�! B11FLi2Ak'PARD Q1Y P LAND USE C1ig,,1sud-Ujw 1 , All potential buvers and renters of onsite: residences shall be notified of the effects rezulting from onsite and offsite oil production activities. The notification shall state the frequency and locations of maintenance aild service operations. The, notification shall indicatt. that noise levels from oil activities may also significantly increase during these t i Ines. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicants shall demonstrate in a manner autisfactory to the City, that service vehicle access to ali remaining operating oil N. ells onsite shall not occur thrcugh the existing or proposed residential tracts. 3. A 3-foot high split rail, natural wood fence shall be erected on either side of all onsite horn: trails to separate this use from other onsite uses. W Ilit-&I No mitigation measures are required. 5-amundinland Um 4. All developers onsite shall be responsible for installation of their "fair shak.s" of perimeter landscaping. Determination of "fair share" shall be made by the Planning Department. Per',meter landscaping shall be installed prior to the issuance of occupancy permits for each particular development. Maintenance and ownership for the landscaped perimeter shall be the responsibility of an established Homeowners Association (HOA). 5. All perimeter landscape plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department. All plans shall be in conforr..ance with landscaping guidel'nes set forth In the Draft Ellis-Goldenwest Specific Plan 6. At all points of entry into the Specific Plan area, additional trees and landscape materials shall be required in accordance with landscape standards set forth in the Draft Ellis-Goldenwest Specific Pian. 7. All perimeter landscaping shall be irrigated with is permanent irrigation system, The cost for installation of this system shall to the responsibility of the developers. ExLUinal.Land Mme Plam. S. No grading activities or developmcnt shall be allowed within areas encompassing natural swales onsite. 9. Detailed grading plans for all development onsite shall be submitted to and approved by the planning Department prior to the issuance of grading permits. Such plans shall show all natural $wales onsite and the Arear t,) be graded. 'D i�i J r �41 10, The: Specific Plan shall address proposed bikeways within the project aria area incorporate goals and standards as outlined in the Recreation Element and the Master Plan of Countywide Bikeways (NIPCB). AESTHETICS 1. All public improvements and design criteria shall be to City standards and In accordance with the requirements of the Specific Plan, City design guidelines, and other C;- design criteria. 2. Grading onsite shall be accomplished in such a manner so as to completely avoid all onsite areas of drainage swales and sharp angles while enhancing the natural I terr-lin. Cut and fill procedures shall be set forth in accordance with the requirements of the Specific Ilan. .. As required in the Public Services and Utility section of this EIR, all Utility lines, including but not limited to, electric, telephone, stye i. lighting and Cable television, shall be placed underground within all areas. The applicant shall be responsible for complying with this requirement and shell make the necessary arrangements with the utility companies for the installation of such facilities. 4. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director and the Director of Parks, Trees, and Landscape prior to the approval of future foundation or building permits. The Iw- -;cape plans shall be consistent with the comprehensive 'landscape theme and standards established by the Specific Plan Design Guideline. Accompanying each tract map application, a tree survey shall be prepared by the applicant identifying all existing trees to remain onsite and all those to be replaced onsite. These tree surveys will be included within the review process. 5. Landscaping and future homes shall be designed so as to minimize visual impacts on adjacent parcels. .Special consideration shall be given to orientation of the project's residences (i.e., windows and decking) so as to respect the privacy of adjacent and nearby homes. In addition, the fror.+ , side and rer­ elevation of residences shall be subject ir, approval by the Planning ':epartment and the Design Review Board. 6. Residences shall be oriented away from the viewshed of adjacent oil wells and tanks. TRAFFIC/CIRCULATION 1. As future development occurs, each developer requesting entitlement for a specific development project shall construct street improvements required per Public Works' requirements providing the construction of Ellis Avenue, Goldenwest Street, and Gat-field Avenue bordering the project to their ultimate half-section widths as Primary arterials. If reimbursement is required, agreements may be entered into by the developer and the City to provide the reimbursement mechanism. 2. As future development occurs, each developer requesting entitlement for a specific development project shall construct street improvements required per Public Works' requirements providing the construction of Edwards Street bordering the project to its ultimate half-section width as a Secondary arterial. If reimbursement Is required, agreern+ants may be entered into by the developer and the City to provide the reimbursement mechanism. Mitigation Measures (2244d) ' _. .. ___. _ ._ ---���-�� _._ _.... . 4.r+rJ.Y1�r.�r•IIiYl..i1Ji LLI�.�.� ..of. 3, As future detive?c pnient occi'+rs, each developer requesting entitlement for a specific development project shall construct street improvements required per Public Works' requirement's providing 150 foot left turn pockets on Ellis Avenue, Goldenwest Street, and Garfield Avenue for traffic desiring to turn left into the project entries. If re linbur•sement is required, agreements may be entered into by the developer and the City w provide the reimbursement mechanism. 4. A STOP sign to control outbound traffic or, all site acce►s roadways shall be lnstal!ed prior to Issuance of any residential or equestrian occupancy permits. ` 5. landscape plantings and signs shall be limited in height in the vicinity of project driveways to assure, good visibility. 6. Internal roadway sizing shall be determined in the design phase of the project and may reflect the recommendation in Exhibit 20. ?. All intc:r-nal roadways shall comply with the City of Huntington Beach Fire Department's requirements, to provide adequate access for emergency vehicles. d. As future development occurs, each developer requesting entitlement for a specific development project shall construct street improvements required per Public Work's requirerncnts towards the Installation of necessary traffic signals. If reimbursement Is required, agreements may be entered into by the developer and the City to provide :he reimbursement mechanism. 9. As each new development is analyzed by the City, traffic counts on the affected roadways shall be performed to determine current levels of service. The analysis shall be performed by others ar+d reviewed by the City at the developer's expense. 10. A traffic signal shall be installed at Edwards Street/Ellis Avenue when a development proposal renders the intersection in excess of warranted traffic volumes specified in the CalTrans Traffic Man ill. These traffic signals shall be Installed prior to the demonstrated need and the underground conduits shall be i;istalled with the new road section construction. 11. As future development occurs, each developer requesting entitlement for a specific development project shall construct street improvements required per Public Works' requirements Indicated in the 'fable J as may be determined by the City. If reimbursement is required, agreements may be entered into by the developer and the City to provide the reimbursement mechanism. 12. A traffic signal shall be installed at Edwards Street/Garfield Avenue when a development proposal renders the intersection In excess of warranted traffic volumes specified in the CalTrans ZrAfflc M 1will. These traffic signals shall be Installed prior to the demonstrated need and the underground conduits shall be installed with the new road section construction. -D. I a . e7f Mitiption Measures (2144cQ �c I t AIR QUALITY 5bW_- `P-rijI Emissions/Dust l . Water shall be applied to the si to twice: daily in compliance with SC:AQIVD Mule 403 (Fugitive Dust Emissions) to mitigate the impact of construction-generated dust particulates. 2. The applicant shall comply with ill rules and regulations of the SCAQMD. 3. Major grading sh,:ll occur when soil cnaisture: is high. l=n •'T. .tm Local Effects No significant Impncts were Identified, therefore no mitigation is required. Stationary Source Emissions 4. The project design shall comply with standards set forth in Title 24 to minimize total consumption of energy. S. Energy efficient lighting shall be used throughout the project, b. Pool heating units shall be limited to those which are solar powered. 7. Tracts and Individual homes shall be designed (through siting and orientation of streets, lots, and buildings) to maximize passive solar heating and cooling opportunities to the extent r easible. 8. Extensive landscaping shall be included around homes to provide shading. This shall be reviewed by the City's Public Works Department, Parks, Trees and landscape Division. Vehicular Emissions The following transportation central measures are not technological in nature, but require planning and changes in customary commuter travel. 9. The following mitigation measures shall be included in the Ellis-Goldenw•est Specific Plan to reduce motor vehicle use: a) Provision of easy pedestrian access, pedestrian walkways, maintenance of street lights, curbs, and walk lights. b) Provision of bikeways to link the area to adjacent commercial and recreational farilities. 10. The City of Huntington beach shall work with OCTD toward the location and provision of bus shelters, benches, and bus pockets in the streets. w 1 4 , 79 MItlption Mea#tm (2244 •s;;ki r�h y r 1 NOISE Cfti:�ialXl_�4�� Construction Activities 1. Construction work shall be c ondurted only between the hours of' 7 a.tn, to 8 p.m. Monday •- Saturday as mandated by the City's Noise Ordinance. No construction shall be allowed on Sunday's or Federal hulidays. ,�St1�T..�►'m tdaise Roadway, .helicopter, and Oil Well Pump Noise. ?. Prior to approval of future tract maps, the applicant shall submit an acoustical analysis of the proposed development, prepared under the supervision of an acoustical engineer. Potential noise sources to be analyzed shall Include traffic--generated noise, helicopter overflight and noise resulting; from operation of onsite oil welia: Tl�e analysis shall include a discussion of the potential need for noise attenuation measures and/or noise barriers around oil wells. This analysis shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Departmf.nt. 3. If noise barriers are to be required, an acoustical engineer shall review the barrier plans to assure acceptable noise reductions and compliance with the City's Noise Ordinance. 4. When firial site plans and construction drawings ;cave been prepared, an acoustical analysis of residential development within the trat fic--generated 60 CNEL contour and within the area impacted by helicopter overflight shall be prepared to insure that the noise criteria have been met. Construction plans shall be reviewed and approves: by an acoustical engineer to certify acceptability prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. As future tract maps are approved under 'the Specfic Plan, full disclosure to all potential homeowners onsite shall be provided regarding the potential for :wise generated by onsite oil wells and by helicopter overflights. 6. No new residential units shall be permitted within 25 feet of a gasoline engine--powered pump unless a noise study prepared by an acoustical engineer demonstrates that barriers and/or other noise attenuation measures (such as conversion of gasoline-powered motors to electric) can ensure noise levels are consistent with the City's Noise Ordinance. Standards. HYDROLOGY/DRAINAGE 1. All future tentative tract maps and site plans shall be consistent with the Specific Plan in preserving area-wide natural drainage patterm, preserving and enhancing the goals, objectives and policies of the General Plan Open Space Element associated with the natural swaies. 2. All future. tentative tract maps, site plans and hydrolo" studies shall comply with the Specific Plan standards. These standards shall restrict development that blocks that portion of the swalt: needed to accommodate runoff from the 1.00--year storm. V.. I C4 .20 Ultigation Meanaw (2244d) ilee. e r 3, Precisr.• hydrologic and drainage design studies shall be prepared prior to the approval of future tentative tract mapF, These studies shall provide mItigat►an Programs to minimize the runoff impacts on developed and undeveloped properties adjacent to developing tracts. All devices, drains, etc. proposed shall be designed ;n ecccrdance with City of Huntington Beach and County of Orange standards. The drainage plan shall include an analysis of runoff imparts to surrounding properties, increases in the quantities of water, increases In water volume flow speed, Impacts to dovrn stream receptors, locations of grease traps, siltation control, on and offstte erosion, and any other information required by the City Engineer. 4. As future development occurs, prior to issuance of future grading permits, erosion control plasis shall include niensu; such as the following: •- Diversion of offs-4c: runoff away from the construction site.; — Prompt revegetation of proposed landscaped areas; — perimeter sandbagging or temporary ba.1ris to trap sediment; and — Regular sprinkling of exposed soils during construction phases. These mitigation measures shall be approved by the Regional Water Quality Control Board and the City of Huntington Reach prior to any construction activities. GEOLOGY/SOILS 1 • Prier vo the issuance of future grading per: pits, grading for properties adjacent to Opium Space Corridors shall be.limited to two feet of cut and two feet of fill for an i overall grade differential of four feet. All other portions of the site shall be subject to the same grading requirements. I 2. prior to the construction of future development, structural designs shall fit the natural land forms to the gTontest extent possible by implementing the use of re-aining walls, split level and platform structures where appropriate, 3. Prior to the issuance of future grading permits, internal collector streets shall be aligned around topographical features and avoid crossing the natural swales where possible. 4. Prior to construction of future development, alluvium residual soils and fill soils shall be removed in tyre areas that will receive fill or other surface improvements down to native and/or competent materials and recompacted. Additional studies nhall be done prior to the approval of feature grading permits to determine native •-levationa and evaluate the extent of compressibility of the soils for structural ,sign purposes. These studies shall be reviewed and approved by all appropriate departments at the City of Huntington Beach. S. prior to the issuance of future grading permits, grading plans shall demonstrate that three or more feet of expansive clays shall be removed beneath structural loads and replaced with low expansive soils. Special foundations shall be designated to tolerate the nature of the expansive soils. Additional studies ~halt be done to delineate the actual locations and :expansion potential of the soils as well as for structural design purposes. b. Additional subsurface investigations shall be performed prier to the issuance of future grading permits to analyze the slope stability of the Quaternary con—marine terrace deposits, to provide design criteria for earthwork construction, and to assess the rippability of onsite soils. Q 0 * i Mitigation Measures (2244d) 7. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, future applicants shall submit to tilt City detailed engineering reports on the soil and seismicity characterixtir:s of the project site. The City sheil review and approve: then* studies to ensu;•e that the structural designs are maintained. 5d6u]iQL'y 8. As future development occurs within the quarter section, all ;•tructures shall be designed in accordance witli the seismic design provisions of the Uniform Building Codes oc• Structural Engineers Associ-ation of Califarnia to promote safety in the event of an earthquake. 9. As stated in Mit;gation h3easure No. a additional engineering studies shall be performed Including s=te trerching to assess if active faulting exists in the near-surface soils, If present, appropriate additional mitigation sliLli be provided at the conclusion of that study. These studies need to be reviewed and approved by the City prior to the issuance of future grading permits, 10. An engineering geologist shall be engaged to submit a report indicating -the ground surface acceleration from earth movement for the subject property. All structures within this development shall be constructed in compliance with the g--factors as Indicated by the geologist's report. Calculations for footings and structural members to withstand anticipated g-factors shall be submitted to the City for review prior to the issuance of building permits. �roundwa ter/Sub5ldgnca 11. All grading plans shall incorporate subdrains that shall be placed beneath the fill soils. Additional studies shall be done to evaluate ground vv+ater depth and moisture zones. 12. Prior to the issuance of future grading permits ijJditional studies shall be performed by geotechnical consultants for a structural engineer. All future proposed buildings shall be designed in accordance with the findings of the structural engineering study. j IL clign 13. Prior to the issuance of future grading permits, grading plans shall demonstrate that � alluvial soils shall be removed in the areas that will receive fill or foundation loading down to competent materials and recompacted. Additional studies shall he done to evaluate the extent of liquefaction of the soils for structural design purposes. Petroleum 14. Additional studies shall be done prior to the approval or' future tentative tract maps to assess the actual number and locations of all the wells drilled on the project site. This study shall include whether these wells were abandoned in compliance with the appropriate regulatory guidelines. All wells not properly abandoned shall be abandoned per the appropriate regulatory ,guidelines. J.r' t4titigation Measures (2244d) :� 15. Prior t the issuance of future grading permits, additional studies shall lie pei-formed Oil tl! ; study area including an EPA ;priority pollutant scan. Possible unknown hazardous material and the passibility of asbcsto3 associated with the old purnp!ng plant and existing oil production well pipes shall be investigated. 16. prior to -the issuance of future grading permits, landscape plans for the project shall Include a maintenance program which controls the use of organophosphates and pesticides onsite. This program shall minimize long--terra impacts upon sates quality and ;hall be approved by the City and reviewed by the Regional Water Quality Cuntrol Ponrd. ARCHAEOLOGY I 1. All future ground disturbing activity within the study area shall be monitored by a qualified archaeologist. 01' in situ archaeological deposits are encountered, the archaeologist shall be empowered to halt or redirect the grcund disturbing activity until proper recovery action can be accomplished. 2. The three on.site deposits of shall and lithic material detected during the reconnaissance shall be subjected to test excavation. The test excavation shall be performed prior to the issuance of future grading perm''z; (including any rough j grading work) and shall have the following goals: - To determine whether the material represents in situ archaeological deposition or redeposited material from elsewhere. •- To determine the significance of the deposits if they prove to be in situ material. - To formulate appropriate mitigative recommendations if the deposits prove to be ir situ archaeological material. - To prepare site records for filing with the Archaeological Survey if the deposits prove to be in situ. 3. Prior to the issuance of future: grading permits (including any rough grading work), the portion of archaeological site CA--Ora-365 which infringes on the property shall be subjected to test excavation, evaluation and reporting. This effort shall include a determination of the significance of the deposit and formulation of appropriate mitigation measures written up in a report. The developer shall be responsible for all costs incurred for archaeological testing and reporting. 4. Archaeological ,sites CA--Ora--82, 88, 364, and the balance of 365 which is offt-ite shall be subject to test excavation prior to the issuance for future grading permits. Test excavation shall be designated to determine site significance and to formulate an appropriate mitigation program for future use. This work effol : shall be written up in a professional report. The developer shall be responsible for all costs incurred for archaeological testing and reporting. S. All material collected during the above recommended work shall be donated to a local institution which has adequate facilities for curation, display and use by Interested scholars and the general public. 6113 1 UJOBatian M93MAMS (2244d) 3, 1n erne h � a BIOLOGY/PLANT LIFE 1. All landscape Flans shall be consistent with the standards of tha proposed Sp+swific Plan for preserving or replacing vegetation onsite. Refer to mitigation measuree 5 and 6 in Section 3.1 and mitigation measure 4 in Section 3.2 in this document. 2. As future development occurs, prior to the approval of tentative tract maps that include the wetlMnd arers, the project prop-onent shall have a qualified biologist reassess the significance of' the onsite -wetlands and if necessary, the proper mitigation measures small he implemented with the Department of Fish and Game. POPULATION None required OLD FACILITIES Oil Flel"ubsideu.cg I. As future development occurs, upon the completion of a residential tract, all onsite oil well operators within the tract shall establish benchmarks. These benchmarks shall be checked twice a year. If oil field subsidence is detected, the all well operator shall take the necessary measures specific by the DOG. j 2. Oil production and gas lines shall be equipped with automatic :shutoff valves which activate in the event of pressure decreases dne to bt eakage In the lines. All lines shall be retrofitted, if necessary. The cost for implementation of this mitigation measure shall be the responsibility of the owner of the lines and/or tho applicant. Qther HaZg[dit 3. All construction onsite shall be conformance with 1987 DOG standards related to development of residontial dwellings near oil wells. 4. All oil wells abandoned or re-abandoned onsite during development of the proposed project shall be in conformance with D.O.G. and City of Huntington Beach standards. This will be accomplished to the satisfaction of the City Fire Department. 5. If any unrecorded wells are uncovered or damaged during excavation or grading, DOG shall be notified and remedial cementing operations shall be required as necessary. 6. All abandoned or deserted wells and drili sites in the project boundaries must be brought up to current abandonment standards set forth by the D.O.G and the City. All costs of abandonment and re-abandonment operations shall be the responsibility of the land developer. 7. Written approval from the State Oil and Gas Supervisor shall be obtained prior to plugging or abandoning any well onsite. The DOG shall also be notified to witness or Inspect all operations specified in the approvel of any notice. S. All abandoned and re-abandoned wells underneath or within ten (10) feet of a structure shall be vented through an exterior wall to the roof line of the :structure, as approved b the City'a Consulting Geologist. Mitigation M (2244d) . i , 9. All development onsite shall he in conformance with requirer:ients set forth in Article 79 of the Uniform Fire Code (UFQ as adupted by the City of Huntington Beach and enforced by the Huntingtoq Beach Fire Department and with the City of Huntington Reach Ui'. Code as adopted by Council Resolution. IU. As future development occurs, prior to issuance of futurr grading permits, if the City Fire De:partn:ent finds it necessary, the applicant.. ;,hall have a Fire Risk Assessment performed. This study shall assess the hazards presented by the oil wells located onsite and define the level of risk from these hazards with respect to life and proper4y. The assessment shall be approved by the City Planning Department and Fire Department. All recommended mitigation measures presented In the assessment shall be incorporated into the design of fut_ir�- tract maps and site Plans, I, 11. Active webs remaining onslto. shall be well-secured frorn unauthorized entry by the use of an eight-foot wall or fence which meets the requirements set forth in Section 15.20.16E through 15.20.180, inclusive of the Huntington Reach Oil Code. Climable Landscaping around any oil facility shall he prohibited. EQUESTRIAN ShQr t-.lecraMmla.rem gut L. Prior to the demolition of the onsite existing stables, either the five acre common equestrlan facility shall be constructed and be in operation condition in order to accommodate potential displaced horses, and/or these potentially displaced horses shall be accommodated in another stable. Manure EtemQyal 2. Manure shell be removed from the premises everyday, unless it is kept in a covered bin or box made of sound metal, brick stone, concrete, or wood lines with fly-tight materials or buried in the ground and covered with earth or other materials sufficient to prevent the attraction or breeding of flies or other insects. 3. Manure shall not be permitted to remain in any bin or box for a period longer than seven (7) days. All manure removal standards shall be maintained to the satisfaction of the Orange County Ventor Control District. 4. Rodent control shall be diligently practiced and the entire premises shall be kept in an orderly and sanitary condition to prevent possible rodent infestation. 5. All dry grains shall be stored in rodent-proof metal containers, and hay shall be stored in a covered structure on a cement slab or on a raised wood platform which maintains a minimum clearance of six (611) inches above the ground. 6. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the Orange County Vector Control District shall be aotifird to inspect the premises to reduce the potential for rodent dispersal. 7. Prior to the approval of landscape plan, plants that are attractive to rodents, such as Algerian ivy, oleander, palm, trees, yuccas, etc. shall be avoided. hJUISatiaa Measures (2244d) ' ago* , i l i fttgr hd1inagetnellf S. Special attention shzyll bc: to w►atEr I)c�cause arci=ilnflo : of manure, bedding, and/or feed within water are ideal for fly production. 9. A non••Icak valve for all troughs, bowls, cups, and other water sources shall be provided in each corral. 10. Automatic vahles, or sanitary drains if the water flour is continuous, sliall be installed in, all large troughs or Cups. 11 , back.--siphoning devices shall be installed to protect thl e public water supply. An approved pressure vacuum breaker is recommended on the water line serving the paddocks. The vacuum breaker shall be at least twelve (12") inches above the highest point of the water usage, or an approved double—check valve may be acceptable. Back-siphoning devices shall not be regvired for automatic water Cups. 12. In paddocks and corrals, the earth surface shall be properly graded to suit the i r rainwater }v atroughsder n t master drainage plan so that ai ��►atc.t and overflows furrtt water o form ponds. 13. In all enclosures where horses are maintained, the land surface of' such enclosures shall be graded above the remaining land si►rface for drainage purposed. 14. prior to the issuance of grading permits, a detailed drainage study shall be prepared for the equestrian site to ensure that runoff from the facility would not interfere with the surrounding residential drainage system. I.S. Wriere possible, roofs shall be sloped away from corrals or stables to prevent flooding and diseases such as hoof rot and thrush. 16. All water manseement shall be maintained to the satisfaction of the Grange County Vector Control District. DoLcontrol 17 Continuous dust control of the entire premises shall be practiced providing a method for light water sprinkling of arenas anti exercise pens. This method of dust control on the premises shall be indicated on the Site plan. Dust control on the premises WWI be subject to regulation contained in Chapter 8.24 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Conde. 18. Perimeter trees and shrubs shall be required for dust control. rgeneral 19. ,prior to the issuance of grading permits, and structural design specifications for the proposed boardInS facility shall conform to those standards indicated in the Ellis--Goldenwest Specific Plan, 20, As future tract maps are approved under the Specific Plan, full disclosure to all potential homeownars onsite shall be provided regarding the equestrian nature of the commu mtr. D- Witt2ation at NWaram (2244d) �r 1?q' 1 d J� 'AA C ' r 21 . Prior to the approval of futrue tentative tract maps, equestrian trails shall be ,Glearly identified on the map. The location of the trails shall be in conformance with the Specific Plan. LIMIT AND GLARE 1 . Prior to the approval of future final tract maps, the proposed height of street lights onsite shall be approvers by the Planning Olrevtor and Public Works Director. 2. Prior to the approval ot. ftrtr.tre final tract maps, all exterior lighting shall be approved by the City of Huntington reach Planning Depart.nent and City Engineer. Il 3. A► phased landscaphig pro-?rmn shall be developed in conjunction with the Specific Plan to ensure landscaping commensurate with residential occupancy to adequately screen onsite light and glare impacts. 4. All outdoor 11;thting shall be consistent with the standards established by the Specific Plan to minimize offsite light intrusion. 3. All outdoor lighting sh411 be hooded and directed downward to minimize direct light and glare impacts on public rights-of-way and surrounding properties. 6. Street lighting shall consist of low Ares;ure sodium lighting and shall be consistent with the City street lighting standards. 7. All lighting associated with the potential -Auestrian center shall be. designed to minimize light intrustton onto property and iright-of--ways surroundic� the equestrian center. PUBLIC SERVICES/U'TALITIES ling 1. Fire access lanes must be provided and kept unobstructed to prevent adverse impacts on fire protection from Tangoing oil production, hazards. 2. Prior to approval of future building permits, complete building plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Fire Department. I If durInS the Fire Department's plan check it becomes evident that fireground operations will become impeded, the department will impose mitigation measures such as automatic sprinkler ristems, alarm systems, access roads, etc. 4. Measures to eliminate ar reduce firm: and safety risks from existing and almndonod oil production facilities and disposal areas are presented in the oil production reaction of the EIR. I1iCS. sWicant sill consult the Police Department during preliminary "aps of the prrojoet daign to review the "fety feature#, determines their �� Mgtts r. and sugpot Imprcriamonts, 10 M (1 r .YJi�rlu s I tiler swolb '4.. 6. The project developer shall provide easy access into w; within the project site for emergency vehicles. The project shall be designed such that all as of thy; pr.: , :�:t wail well-lit, Including alcoves, walkways, IJ,x)rsTeps, and p:ivking facilitles . Alldresses shall be well market) to facilk-ite resfx)nse by officers, 9. The applicant shall provide school fees to m i t ip..a t e, cond,- inns of overrrowdinp as part of building permit application. These fees shall he on the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit appEcation. mmunity Serv3 ce,2 10. The applicant shall pruyide developer fees to provide a neighhor•h(x)d park in the f quarter section. I 11. The following water consevr l don measures Shall be irnplemente., by state ?aw: a. Low-flush toilets. b. Low-flow showers and faucers. c. Insulation of trot water lizies in water recirculating system,. d. trompllance wital water conservation provisions of the z mropriatc plumbing code. 12. Landscaping shall use only lore Y,,at•tn, domand (drougCLI ht-tolerant) spei ien. 13, Irrigation systems which minimize water waste shall be used to the Brea test extent possible. Such ,rieasures should involve such features as th.a folinwing: a. Raised planters and berming in conjunction with closely spaced low volume, low angle (22-•112 degree) sp.,inkler heads. b, Drib irrigation. c• Irrigation systems controlled automatically to ensure watea ing during early morning or evening hours to reduce evaporation losses. & The use of reclaimed water for irrigated areas and equestrian trails. The project developers shall tonne^t to the Orange County Waste District's "Green Acres" totem of reclaimed water should this supply of water be available. Srete irrigation services shall be installed to ease this transition. 14. 'IntMcr water conservat:ofn measures shall be utilized. Low-flow plumbing fixtures wA water pressure regulators to limit down-stream pressure to a maximum of 60 psi dell be installed sl • � � "S tim M easurem (2244d) �Wt 1$. Use mulch extensively in all landscaped areas. Mulch applied on top of soil will Improve the v►aten-holding capacity of the soil by reducing evaporation and soil compaction. 16. URe pervious paving material whenever feasible to reduce surface water runoff and aid in ground water recharge. 17. The developer shall provide Information to occupants regarding benefits of low water use landscaping and sources of additional assistance in selecting Irrigation and landscaping. 18. Control slopes and grades to discourage water waste through runoff. 19. Minimize use of lawns and utilise warm season, drought tolerant grasses. 20. As future developmenic occurs, no permits for Occupancy shall be issued until additional water nupplies as detailed in the 1988 Water *Master flan are implemented and until the reservoir Hill booster station and distribution system are complete and operating to the satisfaction of the City Water Department. i 21. As future development occurs, prior to the issuance of Use and Oc cuplrncy permits, the developer shall construct the necessary water service lines to individual residences. 22. As future deveh-*intent occurs, prior to approve! of* future building permits, complete landscape: and irrigation plans Lhall be submitted to and approved by the Water Department. 23. The developer shall consult the Water Division of the city's Public Works Department during design and construction phases for further water conset ration rneas»res to review irrigation designs and drought tolerant plant use 24. To reduce the proposed projects hnpacvi on waste disposal facilities, project designs shall develop a meals of reducing the: amount oi' waste generated bath during construction and when the project is In use. The wasto reduction program shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to issuance of building permits. Potential ways of reducing project waste loads include implementation of recycling programs, and use of low maintenance landscaping (i.e., native vegetation instead of turf). 25. The developer ,shall contact Rainbow Disposal during the design stage to ensure the most efficient and Economical means for rubbish removal. The design shall include rubbish enclosures, pro,ected travel areas, and turnabouts where necessaryy• ftlic Transp=ation OCTD suggests the following features be Included In site plans for the proposed project in order to support the tranmit service and ewtourage transit usage. 26. The existing bus stop at southbound Coldenwest Street/nearside Ellis Avenue shall be relocated to farside Ellis Avenue. D - 1 a •8q Mitigation Measurps (2244+d) i ;c V . , 1 27. A bus turnout, if determined by the City Traffic Engineer to fie necessary based on roar ay cross section, travel volumes or speeds, shall be provided at this bus stop loca t ion. 28. The area adjacent to this turnout shall include a paved passenger waiting area complete with a bus shelter and bench. 29. A paved, lighted and handicapped accessible pedestrtan access w'n- .d between this bus stop and the project buildings. 30. A concrete bus pad sufficient to support thu wfYiyht of a bus QW11nes for Jim Far."it s►s inay have to bet provided at the would be necessary as suning the mtterial used to construct GL,. :at .str, 't would be insufficient to support continued transit use of the bus stop. 31. Building permits shall not be approved for development for the subject property unless the City Engineer determined that sewer faci:ities are available at the time of application for :such sewer permits and will con cinuu, to be available until time of occupancy. 32. A development fund shall be crested to be utilized for `he construction of adequate sewerage for the development of the project site. 33, The developer shall pay his "fair-share" towards the construction of adequate sewer facilities to service the site. 34. No Tentative 'Tract ,11TIAL..i shall be approved for development on the area tributary to the Slater Avenue Pump Station (refer to Exhibit 3 1) until reconstruction of the Slater Avenue Pump 5;ation is completed or approved by the County Sanitation Department. 35. The developer shall pay- connection fees to either CSD No. 3 or CSD No. 11, whichever is higher at the time of connection to County Trunk lines. 36. The developer shall pay his "fair--:sharr--" towards the construction of necessary drainage culverts. 37. prior to approval of building permits, Ellis Avenue shall be raised approximately 10 feet to accrmmodate the pied drainage culvert construction. 36, Construction of necessary drainage culvertr, shall be accomplished by the developer pr to approvhl to tentative building permits. i 39. Prior to approval of building permits, the developer shall construct any necessary detention .anilines to reduce the peak run-off from the site to the appl-aval of the City Eta nmr. Mitipwti,cn Measures (2244d) (O 0, ,a 1 U1111MI Can 40. Building oonstruction shall comply wf�h the Energy Conservation Standards set forth to 'Title 24 of the Californ;a Administrative Code. 41, r4 Is strongly recommended that the developer consult with the Southend Californis Caps Company during the building design phase for further energy cons irvation measures. � F1wr�tr��lty 42. Building construc:tioa shall oompl;/ with the Energy Conservation Standards set forth in Title 24 of the California Administrative Code. 43. It is strongly recomniende!J the f: the developer consult with SCE during the building of design phase ,fur further energy conservation raearures. 44. The developer &hall subinit CITE building plans which will enabl.- GTE to assess the improvements necessory to p,,,ovide service to the project site. i Mitiptiw Manures (2244d) l l, ' J` r • • T f t ^y ATTACHMENT 2 BtC9`TON 4: SUMXARY Op ORANGES TO DRAFT EIR 88-2 AND ERRATA The following ehanges to the Draft FIR are an noted 15el.ow, The changes do not effect the overall conclusions of the Draft EIR. Gomez Milex►ana BGTR 2 Mitigation Measurers 1-3 on pages 74 of the EIR have been revised to read; 1. As future deves Lopment accurs, each dovelopeY: requeb Ung entitlement for a specific development project shall con- struct street improvements required per Public Worka' requirements providing the construction of Ellis Avenue, Goldenwast Strsat, and Garfield Avenus bordering the pro- J e3ct•. to their ultimate half-.ieeti.or► widths of Primary arterials, 1E reimbursement Is required, agreements may be int.ered into by the developer nnd the City to prov.t.dea the 'teimbu:soment; machanism. 2 . As futura development occurs , each developer requesting entitlement for a specific development; pro,jeat shall con- struct: street improvements required pnr Public Wnrk:a' requirements providing the car►atruct:ion of Edwards Street bordering the project to it<s ultimate half-section width as a Secondary artmrial. If reimbursement is regtti red, agreements may be entered into by they developer and the City to provide the reii bursemant nechanism, 3. As futures development occurs, each developer requesting entitlement for a specific development project shall, con- struct street improvewants required per Public 'oTorks requirements providing 150 foot left turn pockets on Ellis Avenue, Gold.?nwasr Ctreavt, Mad Garfield Avenue for traffic dasiri:tg to turn left into the projects entries . If reimbursement its required, agrosments may be catered into by the developer and the City to provides the traim- bursement n+eehanism, PPIC I i 8n page 128 of the Draft EIR, paragraphs 2 and 3 have been revised to read as follows ; The elimination of swulea by development would requirt the expatmion of 0).1fit:ing underground storm drain facilities. Otheririse, flooding would result from seeverPl factors includ- ing runoff aasoeiatdd with the, watering of lawn and larger rtini+tlls (100 year storm) that could no longer follow the natural. course of draLugm into the awale. There would also be potential flood deaamags impacts to oil operation facilities onstGe. 53 D "o pP!1 r' bxa r. pw r1 � Xt If t:he aisles ara preserved an drainages courses within the development, additional stores drains would not be required and the swales would. contribute significantly to the open space requirements; of the Specific Plan. � g,ira s buildout of the proposed project and the possible elimination of the twwalss unay potentially create flood .impacts upon adja- cent properties unless underground storm drain facilities are expanded. Exhibit 24 depicts the Balsa Chica Lowlands to the vast of the site across Edwards Street , This area lies at a lower elevation than the project site . This area is at great potential rink of flooding due to downhill drainage runoff ' from offaite, adjacent land. i This i.mpact is not conside7:ed significant if underground storm drain or surface drainage swRles are us�id. ;n either case, the water will reach Hiint;ington and S.J.1y Miller lakes . PDR 2 On pages 171 and 203 of twh(e Draft EIR. "West Boundary Sewer Tank" has been changed to "Slater trump Station" . FD 1 On page 21 of thn Draft E R, section (i:) has been adders; "(f) All abandoned or deserted wells and drillsites must be re-abandoned to west the most current requirements of the Division of Oil. and Gas prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits (Section 15 . 32 . 120. 11unti.ngton Beach 01.1 I code) . " FD 3 On page 129 of the Draft: EIR, paragraphs 2 and 3 have been changed to read as follows: "Problems from the release of accumulated methane gas have been noted in the general project vicinity. Methane gas r sources are generally either BI► GENIC (from decaying plant and organic life) or PETROGENIC (from subsurface petroleum deposits) , Altivst: all of the notha►no gas releases in the k1 City have boon biogenic in nature. Methane gas deposits should not be a problem onsite it shallow methane-boating straU do not occur underneath the site , and if all nan- producing oil wells in the area boundaries are abandoned or i Sri-abandoned to the current Division of ail and Gas stan- dards. ,• Abandoned and re-abandoned wells that are located underneath or within ten (10) root of a structure must be vented with a ' system approved by the Huntington Beach Fire Departmor►t, and aq roqukea further isolation measures as deemed appropriate 54 h, by the Fire Chief, Problems can arise around abandoned wells as a result of significant Local earthquake activity." 70 4 On page 130 of the Kraft SIR, Itam 4 has bean changed to read at follows: All oil vetill■ abandoned or to-abandoned onaits enuring development of the proposed project ehal:l be In conformance with D .O.G. and City -if Huntington Beach stare- dards , This will be in accomplished to the satisfaction cf the City Fire Department. FD 5 ' On page 130 of the Draft EIR, Item 6 has been changed. to read an follows : "All abandoned or deserted wells and dr.ill.sites in the pro- ject bout►daries must be brought. up ro current abandonment standards set forth by the D.O.G. and the City. All. costs of i abandonment arid re-abandonment operations shall be the j responsibility of the land developer. " }� FD 6 On page 130 of the Draft EIR, tram 8 has been changed to react as Lallows : All abandoned and re-abandoned wells underneath or within ten (10) feet of a structure shall be vented s through an exterior wall to the roof lines of the structure, as approved by the City' s Consulting Geologist. FD 7 On page 131 of the Draft EIR, Item 11 has been changed to read as follows: Active wells remaining onsite shall be well-secured from unathorized entry by the use of an eight- foot wall or fence which meats the requirements set forth in Section 15 .20. 160 through 15 .20. 180, inclusive , of, the Hun- tington Beach Oil. Cade . Climable landscaping around any oil facility shall be prohibited. Upon conversations with the City Planning Department, the following mitiga- tion soasures hava been changed: Mitigatton Measure 4, page 50 in the Aesthetics section is revised to read, "A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall, be submitted to and approved by the PlstmLng Director and the Director of Parka, Trees, and JAndscapes prior to the approval of future foundation or building po mire. The landscape plena shall be eonsistont: with the comprahennive lar►dscape thews and standards established by the Specific Plan Design tluidelLnes" . Aaovrpatrying peach tract eu:.p application, a tree survay sba11 be prepared by this applicant identifj ing all existing trees to remain on site and all those to be replaced onsite. This tree survey will be included within the rwiw process. Kitigation Measure 2 , page 96 in the Noise section is revised to road, "Friar to approval of future tentative tract maps, the applicant shall sub- mit an acoustical analysis of the proposed development, prepared under the , qy A 55 . 1 err • 1 supervision of an acoustical engineer. Potential noise sources to be ana- lysed shalt', include traffic-generated noise, helicopter overflight and noise resulting from operation of onsi.t:e coil wells. The analysis shall Include a discussion of the potentiel •need for noise Attenuation measures and/or noise bar.s:ierss around oil wells . This nnalysis shell tie submitted to and approved by the Planning Department" . Mitigation Measure 1.4, page 112 in the Geology/Soils section is revised to { read, "Additional studies shall be done: prior to t:hia approvAl of future tentative tract maps to assess the actual number and locations of all the wells drilled on the project site. This study shall include whether these wells were abandoned in compliance with the appropriate regulatory guide- lines , All wells not properly abandoned shall be abandoned per the appro- priate regulatory guidelines" . Litigation Measure 2 , page 115 in the Archaeology section is revised Cu I read, "The -three onsite deposits of shell and lithio material detected dur- ing the reconnaissance tahall be subjected to test excavation. The test excavation shall be performed prior to the issuance of future grading per- mits (including any rough grad.tng work) and shall have the following goal a" � To dlatermire whether the material represents in situ archaeological deposition or Y.edeposited materiel from elsewhere To dlatermine the signLficance of the deposits if they prove to be in ,situ material. • To formulate appropriate mitigative recommendations if the deposits provia to be in situ archaeological mararial • To prepare site records for filing with the Archaeological. Survey if the deposits prove to be in situ ; 4, Mitigation Measure 3 , page 115 in the Archaeology section is revised to read, "prior to the isaliance of future grading permits (in,-ludisng any rough &Ading work) th3 portion of archaeological site CA-DrA-365 which infringes on the property shall bA subjected to test excavation, evaluation and reporting. This effort shall include a determination of the significance of the deposit and formulation cf appropriate mitigation measures written up in a report. The developer shall be responsible for all costs incurred for archaeological testing and reporting" . MWSation Measure 20, page 153 h" been added to the Equestrian section: "As future tract maps are approved under the Specific Plan, full. disclosure to all potential homeowners or^ite shall be provided regarding the equos- a Irian mature of the community Mit'iption 21 gage 153 has bean added to the Equestrian section: "Prior to the approval of future tentative tract maps, equestrian trails shall be i 56 i, _ - i a clearly identified on the map . The .location of the t:railts shall be in con- formance wLtl'1 the Specific Plan. " Mitigation Meastire 1, page 155 in rho Light and Glare section is revised to read, "Prier to the approval of future final tract maps , the proposed height of street lights onsire shall be approved by the Planning Director and Public Works Director." Mitigation Measure 2 , pago 155 in the I,iF,ht and Glare section in revised to read, "Prior to the approval of future final tract maps, all exterior Lighting shall be approved by tho City of Huntington Beat.`: Planning Depart- arne and the City Engineers " Mitigation Measure 20, page 170 in the Public Services/Utilities eect:ion is revised to read, "As future development: occur., no permits for Occupancy shall be issued until addiri.onal water supplies as detailed in the 1988 Wager Muster Plan Are implemented and until the Resezvoii Hill booster sta- tion and distribution system are complete and operating to Vhe satisfaclCion of the City Water Department" . Mitigacion Measur6 34, page 171 in the Public Services/Utility section is revised to Bread, "No tentative tract maps shall be approved for development: on the area tributary to the Slnter Avenue Pump Station (refer to Exhibit 31) until econstruction on the Slater Avenue P»np St:s.t:ion is eomplsit.ed or as approved by the County Sanitation Department" . Mitigation Measure 38, page 171 in the Public Services/Utility section is revised to read, "Construction of necessary drainage culverts shall be accomplished by the developer prior to approval of building permits. " Upon conversations with the California Department_ of Fish and Game, the. following two paragraphs halve been added to the Biology Report dated Decem- ber 12 , 1988 . On page 4 of the Biology Report: under subheading C. Areas of Special Bio- logical Importance , the following paragraph shall be inserted after the first paragraph: "This in not to say that raptorial species are not expected to use -:.his ; sIt* on an Lifrequent tasis as part of a larger foraging area. In fact the Solna Chi^a lowlands and immediately adjacent mesa nreas are docu- mented as bring of significance in this regard: inciuding the use by , the endangered Feregrin Falcon. As part of the wide ranging foraging behavior of these and other raptorial. species they may in fact visit the site, Nevertheless , the site is not considered to be a prime habi- tat for raptorial birds." The above paragraph shall also be added to Fage 118 of the Draft: EIR after t the first paragraph. 57 W r On page 5 of the Biology Report under subheading B. Potentially Significant: Adverse Impacts , the following paragraphs shall be insarted aftar the sec- and paragraph: "It should be noted however, for purposes of future resource plar'ting activities within rhea City of Huntington Beach, the loss of the open space onsita alt bough not significant in itself will add to the regions loss of open space. At some paint, cumulative losses wi.l.l re aul.t in a significant impact to the foraging behavior of raptorial birds and will limit their numbers in the area. " This paragraph shall also be added to page 12 of the Draft EIR after the statement "No cumulative Impacts to biological resources have been identi- �ied. " I _D 58 •E 4.1 4A�: w; 491 ATI'ACHWEff 3 CEGA,SIAIENINI_Of EjrlDll�[!`'r AND FACTS r iJC1 i t7� yp CI REPORT No. 88-2 EST SPECIE1 .mil ZEE CHANGE NQ. 85-1, SIOIVIMANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS WHICH CANNOT BE AVOWED IF THE PROMSED PROJECT IS IMPLEMENTED, FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO SAID EFFECTS, AND STA'I`FUENT OF FACTS IN SUPPORT THEREor. ALL WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED CERTIFICATION OF AN EIrVtIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, RiLIS-GOLDENWEST SPECIFIC PLAN, ZONE CHANGE, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFO RN IA BAC0IM12 The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines (Guidelinem) promulgated pursuant thereto provide: "No public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an EIR has been completed which identities one or more sign!t'icant environmental effects of the project unleu the public agency makes one or more written findings for each of those aignificent effects ac:cowpanied by a brief explanation of the rationale for each finding." The pwsible findings are: 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final 0R. Hereafter referred to as Finding 1. 3. Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility at4 jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the funding. Such changes have iron adapted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such otter agency. Hetreafter referred to as Finding 3, 7 3. Specific economic, social, or other considerations make Infeasible the mitigation reewww or projer:t alternatives identified in the Final EIR (Section 15091 of the Guidelines). Hereafter referred to as Finding 3. The Cite of Hunt1WW Beach is oxmidwing approval of the Ellis—Coldenwest Specific the pmpoW act o-aw c=atitute a project undr the CEQA Guidelines, the CIV Of thig i a n Iles pry pared an F.n isvnmental Impact Itepart (Elk). This EIR i�`feec! tawtain rsigluific ant effwte which may occur as a result of the project, or on M Mel hub in acxt,)unCticre with other pants pramt, end rreara nably foreseeable t ts. Fes, the City &$Ira to appme this project U4 after determining M Is correptte and has been prep►sred in accordance with CEQA and the f do tugs set forth hrerein as rands: Ar �x ZFUDING AND FA N SlJPPQRT QF FINDINGS FOR SIG IFICAN.Ej Gjj� NMFNIAL EFEFCT Gl~ THE PROJECT UESOM DETER,M ED TO LIE INSICN CANT WITLAL STUDY TN City of Huntington Beach prepared an Initial Study to identify effects of the proposed profit which are and are not potentially significant. Those topics which were determined not to be alpfficant are stated below: &IMMil Life The project will not result in change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including rep0i,;s, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or Insects). The project will riot result in reduction of the. r,umbors of any unique, rare or endangered species of arilmais. The project will n result I. w . � i t of es t 7 Introduction of ne 5 eGit.s of animals into a�i area or P j i . result in a barrier to the migration or movement Hof animals. The project will not result in deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat. FW. The project will not result in use of substant al amounts of fuel or energ ,. The project will not result in substantial increase in demand upon existing source of energy, or require the development of sources of energy. HM an Health The project will not result in creation of any health hazard or Potential health hazard (excluding mental health). The project will not result in exposure of people to potential health hazards. lEffws to land ownership. Effects to visual impacts associated with the demolition of existing aisitte stable 152nt LIU Effects to removal of existing ruderal biotic communities, removal of physical habitats and harassment of wildlife. A►ttr*mtent 1 —2— (22.59d) 6 yA� d tlK'6.� 1 d ' � f $ffects to altaration of the location, distribution, density or growth rate of the hwon population of an area. . Effects to equestrian consistency with City and County plans and policies. Effects to long-term displacement ut` City equestrian fatalities with Scenarios 2 and nd OM Effects to project-specific vehicular Aare. f i r a 160 1 -�-- (225 ) d ry'',`tir,F:Lru t I r�V i IrFECTS DETERMINED To 39 MITICABLE TO A LEVEL OF Yr SICtiIFICANCE •rt ' I M USE :Significant—Effect II i Project will result In the location of residential uses in proximity to existing industrial uses to tbm east. r Find%n Finding a s s racts in, Sul2port of Findip The significant effect has bernn nubst-.antially 1, acened to the axt:eno fessible i by virtue of the following mitigation measures •'.dents Pied in the FittAl EIR and incorporated into the project. s I 5 All developui•s onsite sha:'s be responsible for installation of their "fair share" of perimeter landscaping. Determination of "fair share" shall be made by ►he Planning Department. Perimeter landscaping sball be installed pricy, to the issuenco of occupancy vermits for each particular development. Maintenance and ownership for ; the landscaped perimeter shall be the responsibility of an established Homeowners Association (HOA). All perimeter landscape plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department. All plaru shalt be in conformance with landscaping guidelines set forth in the Draft Ellis—Goldenwest Specific: Plan. At all points of entry into the Specific plan area, additional trees and landscape materials shall be required in accordance with landscape sfan0ards set forth in the Draft Ellis—Goldenwest Specific Plan. All pwirneter landscaping shall be irrigated with a permanent irrigation Vstem. The oust for installation of this system shall be the responsibility of the developers. EienificAtAt Iffeet 1 GrWAng activities or development orelte could disrupt or desttioy onsite natural swalas. Thk wound be Incotwistent with pals stated in the Open Spece/C:onservation Element. _ 1 ' t ON 4 4 4 . w i� ,t ,firs in ie rrer . 21 XIMMA jlt, ,. , 1 '-• ,y,, -, Ow ailpifieant effept has been 4ubstnntial.ly lessened to* the' extent feasible by vi,rtae of the foilovAaa mitigation measures 1"itified in the' FinAl .Brit arrd incorporated Into the project. 1 1 No setivittes or development shall be allowed within areas encompassing natural swales oasrite. I Detailed grading plans for all development onsite shall be submitted to and approved ' by the PlstWng Department prior to the. issuance of aradinp permit:. Such plans '.- s1w11 show all natural swales oratte and the areas to be graded. Simitficant Effect Two,blcy01e routes (NO. 31 acid 34) have the potential of bung impacted if the prtipoued SpeciW Plan does not recobdze the bikeways. ' PL.n....,.dIBX lrf.ndin3 1 Pacts in Sup ,art of •Finding The significant stffect has been, -substantially lessened to the extent feasible by, virtue of the .foAloiring id,tigaxtion asaiurea identified -In the 'Final. EIR "d ineorporated into' the koject. s111W. Sp lfib Aen 11 addrow propbaW bikeways within the project area and ' ins nr o steSub and staff_as out In the Recreation Element and the I r t tir'Plaan of CourtVw1de Meways (MPCB). sTJMT1rs 1 SLeif icant Bf f act Thr project may result in visual impacts associated with overhead utility lines. r J. ilk �, FiAdi Finding 1 Facts, its .Upp r t of Finding. u The significant effect has been substantially lessened ':to the extant feasible by virt►.xt of the following mitigiti.on measures identified in the Final 8IR ,,and incorporated into the project. f As`required In the Public Services and Utility section c,f this ElR, all Utility lines, includ+ng but not limited to, electric, telephone, street lightlit and cable television, shall be plaided underground within all areas. The applicant shall be responsible for complying with this requirement and shall make the, necessary arrangements with the utility companies for the installation of such facilittee. Si finificsnt Effect The project may result in short-term aesthetic Impacts associated With the demolition of existing onsite stables. ,y it �I Finding Pir..aing 1 Feats in Support of Finding The significant effect h$a been •substantially lessened to the extent feasible by virtue of the 'followi.cxg mitigation 'measures identified in the' Fi.ndl .BZp. . sand incorporated into the proj art. A detailed landscape a irrigation plan shall be: submitted to w,W appmed by the pl anti irrigation Direct�er and the Director of Parks, Trees, and Landscape prior to the approval of future foundation or building permits. The landscape plans d all be consistent with -the comprehensive landscape theme and standards established by the Specific flan DeslLM Guideline, Accompanying each tract map application, a tree I survey shall be prepared by the applicant identifying all existing trees to remain onsite and all those to be replaced orsite. These tree surveys will be included within the review process. . .t a , 03 1!V r 'K .I� Y• j I ,A� �r I �� ..y 'liy , I' �y '�'� ,'r Y r, » ��', - I yls 1s,,i .r, : , 11 . .i 1, �`. - ' , I•,,.•.t / ,I d i/ i Y,,'• 1f Y ' yap i .•p IL VA`Or*Jftt WAY raault'in vidVAMl IM'Acts to 1. W des on ad Oat pbreels. Finding 1 , ' Fr rp in Suppor,t of Finding, 1 IIYiIW� W The significant offeict has;�been Tul b's taut ially lessened to the extent feasible by virtue of the folloraing mitigation measures identified in the 'Final SIR and incorporated into the project. 1 Landscaping and future Mimes shall be designed so as to minimize visual impacts on ascent parcels. Spisc3sl,cowidfariition shall be given to orientation of � praieat'a x�asidtr ces (i.t.� window:; and de aiW so a to respect,the privacy off i4scant .1 ; f; n earhy, homes. In aeditiaa4 the frimto side 'nnd rear etevatibO ,of resie;ances shall'be submi t to appmal y OA4) Pl ii; �parti;'ant sad the Design Review Board. TIiPIIC/CIRCM ATMI, 41' ji, -at If f ec* i pro d will reaialt iri the generation of-approximetety 71201. AIDT under the Cnne►•al ? Pith l uildout. Ttia one C: , S peiiific' Plan b Wldaut will r� iWt bl S, Al?T. The vf~i11 r t fn reduc ed iyvels iif Service,'Lt S) far traffic in the prat t vicinit;�. a I, ,, • Fi.ndi,� s I Facts in SuReurt of FindJoit M rt The significant: effect has been substantially lessened td the L-xtenL feasible by virtue of the following mitil;�tion meam,,res identified in the Final BIR and incorporated into the projimt. mhD • 1o4 i I 1 ~ 1, •n } AS future develWakent oaoun, each nqmt lrnntitl developer Ow"Vx eet p Zt s t� hall 0"trt s ement for a Apecine tree t iad�prevem44ts requited per Public Woft, ' enue the Oonatruction of gilts Avenue, Coldenwest Street, and ring the project to,, their ultimate half-section widths as Ut"Ish. If reimbursement is M,er :+; , a m is may be entered i ti and the City to provide the reimbursement mWjmnisrn. Into by As future development occurs, each developer request! entitlement � de'welopment ptw�t a<U11 con � ent fora specific uirements providing the construction of Edwards 5 reerequired bo fired per public Works, its ultimate half-section width as a Secondary arterial. If e reiimbs rsellient is h'ed, agreements may be entered into by the developer and' the Cit to r the reimbursement mechanism, Y provide As future development occurs, each developer requesting enti tlement f or a 1 cif development project shall construct street improvernento required per Public works requirements providing 150 foot left turn pockets on Ellis Avenge, Goldenwest Street, and Garfield Avenue for traffic desiring to turn left If reimbursement Is required, agreements may be entered into by the develo er and the: City to provide the reimbursement mechanism. A STOP sign to control outbound traffic on all site access roadways shall be installed prior to issuance of any residential or equestrian occupancy r r P Y� rnite. Landscape planting= and eISna shall be limited In height in a the vicinity of project*IvewhYs to awresood visibility, Interval roadway sizing shall be determined in the design phase of the project ts►ay reflect the recommendation, in Exhibit 20. j and All internal roadways shall comply with the City of Huntington Be ach rtment s requirements, to provide adequate accea�s for emergency vehicles. Fire AS future development occurs, each developer Fe requesting entitlement for a specific developrarerAt project shall construct street im rar►ements required requtremtnte towards the installation of necosaary traffic ai q �ls. If Public camWbrk,s is 8n f reimbursement a h`ed, agrftmeixts may be entered into by the developer and the City to provide the reimburimment mechanism. As each now development is analyzed by the City, traffic counts on th ro adwways stall be performed'to determine current levels of service. a affected 9011 be performed by others and reviewed by the City at the developer's The analy.. sis P xpense A traffic signal shall be tnetalled at Edwards Street/Ellis Avenue when development proposal renders the intersection in excess of warranted r ffic vOluraes specified in the CalTrens Installed prior to the demonstrated d and the underThes out traffic signals shall be hMalled with the new road section construction. � conduits s';nall be s D - 1 t 1 1 „ flode t urfction with otlwr pW proms in th* vicinitywill t. ( i) E for traffic•in the pM j"t vicinity. resul . irk Lev tatim of tnitipilon meirurol will.reduce cumulative impl6tk to a level of 4 .; C for better) eaaapt for tint Yorktown Avemue/Goidenwest Street l , tertian w iCh is c onside,red significant (LOS D). PindIng t ! site in _52220vt Of_ Findina si$nifIcant effect has been -subs eantiall y. by virtue of the following mitigation measureslearened to the extent feasible ientifand incorporated into the project. ed in the, x1ne►1 .BxR An ura development occurs, each devel ' r requesting entitlement for a opment pra�Oct EM11 ootratruct street irdprovementt � ifs# r6*1riments Indicated in the Table J as may ba dater end per �°�blia V6rorke� reimbursement is required, agreements may be entered int�a b y the City' If City to provide the reimbursement mechanism. Y the deveYoper and i A .traffic 9tgnal shall be installed at Edwards Stra�t/Ger !development proposal renders the Intersectionfield Avenue �vhen a volumes ,specified in the CalTrans in eyccess 4f warranted traffic inrtalle�.l �h . These traffic signals �sMll be !r-otalled with the n e demonstrated need stxl the 'underground conduits ew mad sectiol., construction, shall be A 0VAi,ITY 'i gi Ificaat Effect ------------ Development onsite will result in short-terra carIstruction•-related impacts �a A$ n air quality. • LIndinit Finding 1 D_ I y ;.'i_ 4, :N Imp ,.; ; �'',' }11y,,,• acts is >: The SiSnificant effect has been -substantially lessened k� exrerit feasible » ;•` bar virtue of the following tsitigatian measures identified in the •Yinal Eig oAd incorporated Into the project. : Water shall be applied to the site twice daily :n compliame with SCAQ1ne Rule 40$ (Fugitive Dust Emissions) to mitigate the impact of Construction�gener�ated dust particulates. The applicant shall comply with all rules and regulations of the SCAQMD. r, Major grading shall occur when soil moisture is high. Significant Effect Occupancy of residential units otwite will result In long-term increases in stationary source emissions bath on- and off-site. Ftriding Finding 1 Facts_inn SU20rt of Finding The signiiies t. effect has been substantially lessened to the extent feasible : by virtue of the following mitigation measures Identified 'in the Final EIR and incorporated into the project. The project design shall comply with standards set forth in Title 24 to minimize R, total consumption of energy. Energy efficient lighting shall be used throughout the project. Pool heating units shall be limited to those which are solar powered. L Tracts and individual homes shell be designed (through siting and orientation ,of streets, lots, and buildings') to maximize passive solar heating and cooling qpportunitles to the extent feasible. Extensive landscaping shall be included around homes to provide shading, This shall be reviewed by the City's :Public Works Department, Parks, Trees anti landscape Division. IR , to? � 1, .9 ` t 1 . t 1! 'f k* f .. p6ject will dealt in km-t" hureases in mobil source .missiMMO Tinding PaSIS VA AUPPOLU9 Findin The slinificint' affect hAS been *ubst&ntially• lessened to the extant feasible by Vll.; 4 of the fallowing aitigaticn measures identified in the Final -M and i,oeorporated into the project. The following mitilgation measures d all be included in the Ellis--Goldenwest Specific Plan to reduce mow vehicle we; a) Provision of easy pedestrian access, pedestrian walkways, maintenance of street lights, curbs, and walk lights. b) PkwiAm of bikeways to link the area to adjacent commercial and .recreational facilities. i The City of Huntington Beach shall work with OCTD toward the location and prewislon of bus shelters, benches, and bus pockets in the streets. NOW �{ ll w S f ieaq- If ffeeet 7 Traffic-relat+dd noise will occur as a result of proposed dtvelapmen t onsite. Finding � yfndiaB 1 a , p • 11 d 1 L. OIL ZAS f4 Ig in duosort df Pindins The 81.64ficont effsat has been substantially lessened to the extent feasible r' by virtue of .the following nitigiti.dn measures identified in the final EIR G; and inco>irporsted into the project. Prior to appraival of future tract traps, the applicant shall submit an acoustical analysis of the propoe�+ed development, prepared udder the supervision of set acoustical angineer/ potential noise sources to be anal�iYed shall include traffic— enarated noble, helicopter overfli t .end noise resulting ftom operation of onsite oil wells. The analysis shall Include a discussion of. the potential need for noise attenuation nmeasurett and/or noise barriers around oil w.eils. This analysis shall be submitted to and approved by the planning Department. If noise barriers are to be required, an acoustical engineer shell review the barrier plans to assure acceptable noise reductioAis and compliance with the City's Noise Ordinance. When;final site plans and construction drawings have been prepared, an acoustical analysis of residential development within the traffic—generated 60 CNEL contour~ and within the area impacted by helicopter overflight shall be prepared to inswe that the noise criteria have been met. Construction plans shall be reviewed and ed b an acoustical engineer to certify acceptability prior to the issuance of approved y � Y P building permits. �I I Significant Effect Impacts associated with residential uses built in the vicinity of producing oil wells will occur as a result of the proposed project. • Findi a i Finding 1 • S; Facts in support of Finding The significant affect has been substantially lessened 'to the extent feasib' le by virtue of the following mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR and incorporated into the project. Prior to approval of future tract maps, the applicant shall submit an acoustical analysis .of the proposed development, prepared under the supervision of an acoustical engineer. Potential noise sources to be analyzed shalt' include traffic—generated noise, helicopter overflight and noise resulting from operation of onsite oil wells. The analysis shall include a discussion of the potential need for noise attenuation measures and/or noise barriers around oil wells. This analysis shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department. � a , lo9 a f'M * �I rT• ` r , , Nrti't No MW tial W&S null be WMIttad wl a� 2S feet Of a all" '' • . "I M is wow stt* p aps" by an saous ical ugbW t Nsr� aWer odor neVa attenuation meaum (such as �l wd Mom to olectric) can ensure noise Web are %M C14 eMoma 1 Orrdlnmwe Stv*rds. Bi nifi t � ct Elimination of swales by development oould potentially create flooding of streets and 1 : pro'pertift a ; ' • f'indit� i Fiad�tg t , yacCa i.n $uopost of MUMM The sijUlficant effect has been •substanti.ally lessened to the 'extent fessible by virtue of the fallaaing taitigation measures identified in the' FinAl .XXR and Incorporated Inca the project. All future tentat6il Ulet maps and site plans shall be consistent with the:Sp-d"'ic Plan in Pr eserving area-wide natudrtil drainage psttem,'"preserving and the ls; oWectives NW policies of' the General Plan Open Space Element 8400cleted with the natural swales. ..M1 MUM to ntetttva tract maps{ alas plans and lVdi- logy studies shall `comply"WIth the 5paclfle FUn standards. These itandar& shall rvistzict development that blocks tbat-portioo of the needed to accommodate ru,�bff ffrom the 100-year storm. n GEOLO +GY/SOILS Sigtnifitsnt Effect The project will altar existing topography and suits through the proposed grading and rostruction activities onsite. f awn 1 '� I ill 114P + A 1 � 4WO w 1 , Y r M 1 ° The eisuilic4st effoet has b•ea substantially lessened to the extent feasible by virtUs Of the following mitigation measures identified in the Ftnal. sla MW 1"corporatod into the project.. ' Prior to the issuance of future grading permits, grading for properties adjacent to Open $pact Corridors for an ovW&J Xrud+e differential of faull ben feemitt. Alltwo other portions of the site shall befeet of cut and two f W, oflsubject to the same grading requirements. Prier to t1* construction of future development, structural designs shall fit the natural land forms to the greatest extent possible by implementing the use of retainitr, walls, split level &M platform structures where appropriate. Prior to the Issuance of future grading permits, internal collector streets shall be aligida►d around topographical features and avoid crossing the natural swalees wWe possible. to cone'tructic'n of future developments alluvium residual soils and fill soils sM11 be re tired in the &raw that will receive fill or other surfacer Improvements down ,to native sus Or oompetent materials and reeomp�tcted. ,A lditiaeal studies ill be don e orto. the approval of future grading pemitu to detem' Ine' natives elerv�itiorw tkA extent of compressibility of the soils for structural desl$nn p penes. Thane studies shall be reviewed and approved by all appropriate departments at the City of Huntington Beach. Prior to the issuance of future grading permits, gradhiS plans shall demonstrate that three or more feet of e2 pansive clays shall be removed beneath,structural loads and replaced with km expansive soils. ;special foundations shall be deftntred to tolerate the, nature of the. expansive soils. Additional studies shall be dune to delineate the actual locations and expansion potential of the soils as well as for structural design purposes. Additkml submIsce investigations shall be performed prior to the issuance of r fumvet Ong permits to analyze the slope stability of the Quaternary non-marine terrace deposits, to provide design criteria for earthwork construction, and to asses that rippability of orwite roils. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, future applicants shall subunit to the City detrile d engimering reports on the soil wW seismicity characteristics of the project site. The City shall review and approve these studies to ensures that the structural desigm are maintained. ex • i e i �j - f 1 n 4;� %101 lop w! wI♦!',N q,40o' 'may' •'. a, , k •V „ .w 1 .`1i. , .'. , :y'', ,R„ : b I' IV a aay1�► active +area.. The sig;nifivaut of fact has been -subs tantially. lessened to the extent feasible by virtue of the following uLtigation measures i.dent:ified in the' Vinil .EIR and incorporated Into -the project. As future deve1cpm,,%nt occurs within, the quarter section, all atroctures shall be designed In accardsn�e with the seismic design provisions of the Uniform Building C4deis at Structural Engina Assoc-lation of California topromote safety in the s> event of an earthquake. As stated in M 'ti attar hlaasur4 eta. 4 additional engineering studies shall be f peed lteciuding site trenchke to assess if active faultirs wdsts in the mace solls. V present, appropriate additional mitigation shall be provided at the condution of that study. These studies need to be reviewed and approved by the Ci#iip P tar to the issuance of future grading permits. An wgh* 1&% gsalolist shall be engaged to submit a report indicatir the j %wad suirfaoe aooela Atiati i am earth movement for the subject p np►erty. All structurer, wlWn this develophient thsli be constructed in compllawA with the g-factws air ideated by the , geologbt's report. Calculations for footings and struct wal ambers to,:,wif mand anticipated g-factors shall' be submitted to the Cie; fc+r a reWew.prier to t>et tailance of building permits. gUet,ficant Ef feet The potential for subsidence to occur eeadsts on the project site. • pin..._..�.��g Finding 1 "T' r Al i A. "ry• r o+,rid '(°yu• , '+ ' 'r ""M+ / II+ • Sri, Mau gs ZABAW iiii y i 4 r i !'gaeet rffeet• has been -substantially 1saMsned to the axtvnt fsaai6la ►.' y ofthe fade .n Idtigation s�easurss idetttifie�! in the FinalBIh 1046"W rated into the pvcjsit. d 11 irtca poste subdrains that shall to placed benarth the fill 1 atudlos shalt be dote to evalueta ground water depth and m►nisture 'r Prior to true iuuance of future graditrg permits additional studies ftill be performed WootecMdeal oanoltants for a structural andinser. All futtae p� bulldiggs • 'be ds� in a t�dance with the ftndngs of the structural engine it :tub►. Secant Effect A ._Yid The project lies in an area of moderate to high liquefaction potential. • d �, hihdipg 1 +, F' P p`acts is Su ort of Findia, I The significant affect has been substantially- lessened to the extent feasible by virtue of the following mitigation measures identified in the Final SIR and incorporated into the project, Prior to the i� of future graditlg permits, grading plans shall demonstrate that ' alluvial soils ahe11 boo reamed in the areas that will receive fill br foundation ' to ceding down to competent materials and rexccorr pacted. Additional studies shall be 5 dose to evaluate, the extent of liquefaction of the soils- for structural design SlaniY icaut effect The project lies in an area containing abandoned and active oil production wells. A. Potential impact exists if wells are not abandoned properly. Ly L' , Wy�, rim b� findtag Y J§J Ig fnear% of FAndiut The NiSsAfiaoart affs*t has been •edb9tantially. lessened to the extent feasible by virtue of the folloviug mitigation measures identified In the' Final Silt and incorporated into the project. 1 Additional studies shall be dine prior to the approval of future tentative tract maps ;^ W 406M the octal number and locations of all the wells drilled on the project site. This study shall inclueie whether these wells were abandoned'in compliance with the to regulatory guidelines. All wells not properly abandoned shall be s per the spproprlate regulatory guidellnes, ' aiglnificant_ Sffect Other hazurdm a Materials associated with uil field development may to present onsite. . pen,..,dim , Funding 1 tact■ in S rt of Finding � The sigaificant: effect has been •®ubst:antial.i lessened to tha extent feasible Yt by virtue of the following mitigation measures i.dentifiad in the -Final SIR and incorporated into the project. Prior to the Issuance of future grading permits, additional studies shall be performed oa the stub area includinS an EPA priority pollutant scan. Possible unknown !> ►rdo sneterial and the possibility of asbestos associated with the old pumping plant and existing oil production well pipes shall be invesrtigs: .d. Prior to the issuance of future grading Permits, landscape plans for -the project shall include a maintenance program which controls the use of o,rganophosphates and pesticides onsite. This program shall minimize long-term impacts upon eater quality and shall be approved by the City and reviewed by the Regional •Water (duality Control hoard. 11� f• • } ^r Nn Y w • , i Gk(•1 'E TI',I 'M• •'Y 1 r • f n p��,�i� irl fR , . p • � `ti H' � Y.�1 r'p' rq '• , a 1,, 0 ` i ��># •' f a w, �1� t't i"rr•`'a..' �11•.",,�4 "a, :1 !p'p ,,•,, 1°'. , . S'•••�i�d�Y * I 1¢" M.; oast s_f o 4 ; tl will t osult in the 60"Wtke Of potwtially ftlifi6ant k 11 stadiug 1 r. . a frt►s►.Ct of 8iri4102 *; The sipiflileaut effect r boo been substantially lessened to the extent feaaible by vi,xtue Lit the folloit�g ult:igation measurer identified in the, Final-AIR and incorporated into the project. All fat" =oXist. �i�turbing'activity within the s#,.t* �' ea shall be monitored %WT a llfied ar ;Of in situ archaeological deposits are encotmtered, the arcl ►eoia Nt t11 bo erupover6d to halt or'redirect the ground dlstWtkg activity woo pvW re empo yr action can be accomplished. r" The tl otoite' d�)Wts ' of shall' and lithic matedel , def:ected during the roco"[Wale�;'ethall be subJected to test excavation. 'The: #mot vation "I be parted to the issuance of future grading permits (including any rouSh �%r nand shalt have the following,goeb. t To determine whether the material represents in situ =Meological deposition or redeposited material,fhom elsewhere. -- To deetermine the significan" of the depasits if they prove to be 1i situ mated. ' I To fa6mulatet a rta mi tip. at if the lei pme to , �. ��► tip rr�m��iatic�, a�o�; be in situ ardbasokoeml material. 1' To p mpare s1te'reem* for filing with the Archasolojpeal Survey if tto deposits prove to be is situ. +'y Prior to the 1"U"M Of ftature grading-permits (includint any rotA ceding wo0k), the portion of archaeological site GAOra--363 which infrh*a gn the shall be subjected to test oxftvation, evaluation and reporting. Th s effort shadinclude a determination of do significtim of the deposit and formulation 'of appr riateR mitigation meamtws written up in a report. The developer shall ba risible for all costs IucurrW for archaeological testing and reporting. • i is -D 4 r r i Arohae l cal site@ CA-Ora42, 88, 3640 and the balum of 365 which is oiafdte ftll be object to test excavation prior to the issuance for future grading permits. Tat awavation @ball be designated to determine site significance and to fdrntulate ' an a�iate Multiption program for future use. This work effort shall be written v in a professional report. The developer shalt be responaffie for all costs incurred arobs o lc:al texting and reportinS.• Aft witerlal oallacted during the:abc ve recommended work shall be donated to a All tltution which has adequate facilities for curation, display End we by v scholars and the son").Ptblia. L Glr/PLANT f ,, Si�ificant ��cct fit•' Y��Yl..rrr•Ir♦It�t• The proiect may result in the removal of eucalyptus tree &me onsite Finding 'I ' Facts its Supjio�•t of yindi.ne ■�rr•.r*r.rir�rwwr^ww ter! r...r^�r, sl#nlficaot ':ffact has been► •substantially lessened to the extent feasible by virtue of the following mitiSation measures identified in • the' Fini-I-EIR and incorporated into the project. All fends.Olans shall `be consistent ,with she standrrds of the proposed Sp"-Itic PimTor, r or repyaci tatio n oW te. Refer to mitigation measuresWW 6 In and mitigato�e r Measures 4 in Section 3.2 in fhis document. , i Signif icmt If feet The profit will result in tM Potential loss of identified riparian/wetland Deane. 1 y I • Pladlat 1 Tho ai*nlfi.cant - of feet has been -substantially lessened to the extent fexsi.blet by Artnee of the! followiftg mitigation measures identified in the •Final EIA Oad i,scorporated Into the project. , A,yIuture divisldpment oce.urs, prior to the a pprovai'of tentative tract Maps ttAt . 1wh4b the wetland arms, ft project proponent thall have a qualified biologist neat" the eigniticance of the ostisite wetlands and • if necessary, the fie` mitigation memsurts shall be implemented with the Department of Fish and Game. OIL FACMUM g ilirdint Pffict . 1 The potential exists for the,PrOACt Site to rience subsidence with future oil removal. r ` pindang 1 ; viiiatf, ireeagt ,-�ltset has been substantially- leeeened to the extent feasible oaf'Virtue of , the gvheriring s itigation waxures idtri�tified to the* Fined get 40 iao orate d into the ,projects ` /I,N fits developmeert seers, uWM am,oa►rapl*ti&'6f a' tial tract, an amte p e witift the tract shall eestab1M"be�hmirks. Theere �m 1 �Q twice a year. r It ,oil deld miWideime is datected, the oil well e pat taw"all take the necessary measures'�Vwlflc,-by the DOG. ' Oil produatit n and ses lines shall be equipped with automatic' abutoff valves which aCehn►tv in-the event. of pressure de mvems due to breakage in the lines. All liner "I be rat fitted, if necmaty. The cost .t far implementation of this mitigation m pr ahall bie the responsibliityr'at the owner of the lines an+&w the applicant. D -1 1 ryryyy •' a I 1 w" I M f y I s jAs futuwa development occurs, prior to' Inuance of futuTe gradb g permits, if the ' pity Fire Deportment finds it necessary, the applicants shall have a Fire Risk . AsariesWasst performed. This study shall assess the hazards preeanted by the oil Mans located onsite and define the le'vel.of risk from these hazards with rest to lift stud pra perty. The assessment stall too approved by the City Platlydng Pe'poirtment and Fire Department: All recommended mitigation measures preserved ia..the assessment shall be incorparated•into the design of future tr.act maps and site Active wells remaining onMtd "I be well- cured from unauth.4w ized entry'by the r use of an el&-Moot wall or fence which mike the requirements iet forth in Section 15.20.160 tbror kh 15.20.190, inclwdve of the Huntington beach Oil Code. Climable LaimUcaping around any oil facllity shell be prohibited. EQTMTRMX Slarificant Effect The 000*t *Ill i atilt in short-term displacement of City equestrian facilities. I Fieding 1 f • Facts In Support of Finding ' i i I.I.r�.. r ■Iw,a.� Irr - s nifleaut effect has been nubstantlally. lessened to that extent feasible by.` virtue: of tha ,followingg vdtigetion measures ident•ifiod in the. Fina. 1 SIR and incorporated Into the project. PilxrltQihe demotion of tM ondte existin* ostabl.es, either the five acre comman ftedbty shall bt oonstructed and be Vi op6ration Condon in order to a if hodaf'potential diWaced hoses, and/or llmm potentiiW displaced hates Owl he accommodated In another stable. SIRE flesh't Eff..,. The project will result In site-4pecifi,c impactri associated with manure removal, rodent control, water management and dust control. ,tit" �"iq•Y M• . 1 ti' I n:, fill own Ef feet The "Man%if oil wslla,'in elms proximity to resi -atial development will potentially re+wdt in Mothium gait accuuautatian and varrdalisrn. r K� ROW '; •' WIG o t of MWISR The siso4 ia'n' t off act MAP been '•substantially lessened to the extant feasible ';`I by wi r t6a of :',the following sdtt gation measures identified in the, Final .Ell SMA ii7etWpo:atad into the project. All dtkii dwtlbn omits sM11 to orrnanw* with 1987 1OC stands, related to develor,Ment of residential dwrl]UW near oil well:. ° Allffil,.*e11s abandoned er r"IiardOo�l 'unite during 'develonment of the,proposed Ott.; "I ,be Jh conformance .with D.O.G. and City of Huntington Such r stat;iliit Tblo will be accomplIWW to the satisfaction of the City Fire �p�t�ile�'1t, it., totiew*d .wells are tnr ovwed or damaged during emvition or era dio1l 'be notified and remedial cemeating operatiats shall be required as All :or deterted• wells it d drill slta iA, the p -qje ct boiuxlartet owt be bmu& yp it* auerent sbsrdoniaant I met forth by the D.O.0 and the• city. All # •�idoa�nnesrrt ad re,-+wdtrnt c, ratf ahryybn the rdeottstity Of dw 1WW lape�r. 'lilhritt" ry I from the $toto Oil wW Ow Su*v for "11 be*,bbitalned pclor to + Apr,well oodite., The DOG aball aluo be notified to wtftwm at Mkt t atlo w fkd In the-approval of gay notice. i ` ab Mod DWOR d WIN Wit, o'r wlttrfn ten V OY f"t Of'a or wall to ft tMf liter of the structure, *aby to Clt ,Cbang Qoi t. All WpM aat oneite doll be in cWormance with "requirements ' Arti a 7� of the tlnif rib Fire (UPC) as a get forth is t d�t by the City o� Huntiz%too -D e•dh and vegk ed'fair s Hwiflog beach Fire Department and with she City of HtWititW= Such Oil Code at adopted by Council Raealutiom , s f I V, i T '�N Ok slob • Fi it Finding 1 Facts in SuzOort of Findins . t signifitaJnt offoct has been -subsiartially lessened to the extent f easibIl e by vXrtue;of the following mitigation measures identffled in the' Finel .Cii and $ucarporntod ietito the protect. 7 ii Mid ill be removed ft6m the promise* everyday, unless it is kept iii-is covered bin or.boss made of end Retal, brick storm, concrete, or wood lines with,fly-tight iatU or buried in the ground and covered with earth or outer 'materials adn.'teat to prevent the attraction or bleeding of Elias or other insects. l 'w*shall not-be permil'itted to remai In in and► bin or box far'a pie-►iod 16nSer than sevistr (7) 1 . All manwz-6 removal standai da thall be maintained to the natdsgaction 7, of dw Orsnp County weritor control District. R oddl6f odatt+bl "ll'be dilisently.practiced and the entire premitm nhell be kept-in an, pcdetrly mW ta 'conditidn to prevent pobtible rodent infestation. 'AU d v Smia shall bi stared in evdmtt-proof metal c ontalneri, ,abd' hey shall be sox In * cowered stiucium on a cement slab or on a raised wood platform Which malibeiW a ib Wmu''m cle6rance of dx (6") inched above the grouaj. Prior to the UMUUM of grading parmitas, the Orange County Vei:nor ContTel'District *All be rifled t the preinkes to reduce the potential` * rodent dispersal. Nki r� to tom' re~i of landWAgm'plan, plants that are attractive to.''t te, sum ; lsn h', ', papa; tr ,1 yuccas, etc. shalt bn avoid. 1 att4h6 l dlwdi ib ! 6i� to water . ; die systems because 8c umuletfa of manure, "Mr teed wMn water are kkal for fly production. lh oak iralMe; faYa �a 1 trai am;t , bawls, c and other water sources ll be Pe 6 d in each oae�rel. Automaide weer, ,or saWtary, drams if the water flow is continow,- shall be installed'in tell lame UvvgN or cups. i 1 � fix --A r' 4 k oning devices shall be installed to protect the public water supply. An approved pomur vacuum breaker is recommended an the water line serving the The vacuum breaker shall be at least twelve .(1211 inches above the l point of the water usage, or an approved douWe-check valve may be accsp►ta AL Back-alphoning devices shall not be required fa• rutamatic water cups. in paddocks and oorrals, the earth surface shall be properly graded to suit the master dr0ugo plan oo that rainwater and overflows form water troughs do wt e form I ► � e»claaru wbere horses are maintained, the lwW surface of such enc:oaures *All be graded above the remaining land surface for drainage purposed. Prior to the 16mace of grading permits, a detailed drainage study shalt be prepared for the equestrian site to ensure that rvnoff from the facility would not interfere with the ending residential drainage) system. Whoes 'pass 146 roofs shall be sloped away from do T&U or stables to prevent flooding avid 4heases such as hoof rot and thrush. All wester manapment shall be maintained to the satisfaction of the Grange County Vector Control District. ,.not Cantral ContkWus dust oontirol�of the entire premises shall be practiced providing a method for A& water sprinkling of arenas and exercise peen. This method of dust con rcl an .the p mises shall .be indicated on the Site Flan. Dust control on the promises shall, be' aiubj t to regulation contr.Ined in Chapter 8.24 of the Huntington Beach Mpnichal Code. parlmoa9r tram snd shrubs shall be required for dust control. e• i UGFM AND GLARE SAIEing"i sap The project *U1 reim1t is street, vehicular, security and equestrian related lighting %hich wi11:.be visible to surrounding areas. !` A7 11r9ject gill 'result in an incremental increase in the amount of light and gl.aro_in the ar". i Finding I. 00 �,1 m u�� CIN` A �•. Y �� Spa rt`ie�CC of Finding ? The significant of fact has been -substantially lessened to the extent feasible by virtue of the following mLtlgation -measures Identified in the -Final SIR ' and incorporated into the project. PO prw to.,the P al of future -f final tract Oda , the prcoosed, height of str"t.twits:Oasitt shall be aMwed by the Plamft Director and: Public 1Il'O&B k' liar to the approval of future final tract Mips, all exterior lighting shall bee ed by the City of Hwitington Such P1annir# Depar`tnient and Cityt `. i A ptiaaMad ?etscaping program ill be devi'loped in csmjunction'?with the Specific Plan to enme landscaping commensurate with raddontial oocuparicy to adequately screen onsite light and glare impacts. Alf txut&w listinS shall tie consistent with the stendardi established by j the Specific Plan to Minimise offsite light intrusion. All outdoor lfgh r, shall;�be hooded and directed downward. to minimize j rift :light Arid glare impacts on public rights-of--way grid surrounding pirtrties. Sti eet�'lightb g shall uenelst of law pressure tedium lighting an shall be cauittent with the City street lighting standards. All lighting assocts,00 with the potential ept tential equestrian cer shall be d i ed -to . mUdmize light tatruat on onto property aW fright-of-ways J trtwr�nding tM a graestrlan center. P'C U S i�'I SJUTHIT'I '$ Tha p dJeot' w111 cuipAitiwly affect capacities of services andjutilities in 4 can cadn with bias gsoath in the area. Finding 1 3 06 �yr'y i mob + yypp .Ryy �C C yiw'iA,�;y}�„x�it H}.„ ur'r w.•:' '^' V r. 1 I Fitt acce lam must be provided and kept unobstructed to prevent adv+em impacts on fire protection froth oeSoing aril production hazard:. P'ricr to app vvai of futum buiidin` permits, complete buildinj plans shall bo aubmAtted to vW approved by the Fire Depbrtmeat. F if dwft' the Fire DepartmenXIs plan check it becomes evident that F epwado w will beco** Impedeoie eta department will impose mmaxess such as automatic sprinkles systems, alarm 4ptemal Measures to:eliminate or reduce fire and safety risks from existing and ndonW *J1 production faciliflas and dispml ages are presentted'in the Qi1 pnoduatiun aticn of the FJPL ;r The 4ppii t ;shp U consult the Police Department during prellmhma y stag of tM prq*t desiipn to review the na 'ety features, determine their adequacy. mW suggest improvements. The t &weloper shall per Mde easy access into and within the project site for #I emergency vehicles. .of suc h tprotect will be well lit The pt�,3ect ill�lie •d�tl� such that all are" ie , including alcoves,°w-�lkwsys, doorsteps, WW parking facilities . r , Ad asses shan'be well marked to fsellitaie response by cfficers. •fait T appl4ci t :'tall vide 6hoc i feet tea n,i ate 'oandlttops of av wdiitt g as { p6r� of perm t, cation. These fees shall be based on the fee selmdute in. i�'rkt at M a of bid per mit a-pliCatiba I � � da eve fps to de a nzi vdpork in tba q,;mrtur sect�a:' ,: tol1111 n� water- conservation mimes stall be Miplemented as required by gtate law: ' a. tolletr. be ir-»i"w showers and faucets. , c.'. himu lay of trot water lines in water.,recirculating systems. 4. COMO ii n" With water conutrvation provisions of the ap nWdate plumbing ' aod�. n 'gyp,•, L aphM shall use only lorry water demand (drought-tolerant) species. I gation voteems which minimize water waste shall be used to the greatest extent passNg& Such measures should involve such features an the following: lied planters and bermirrg in conjunction with closely spaced low volume, low ansle (22-1/2 dgpw) sprinkler as. ' ton' , m ccmtralled ;Autometirally to ensure watering doing early 0--orl�"or emft do rs too reduce evaporation loses.• d. The We_ of reciaime d water for irrigated areas and equestrian trails. The project-developers shall connect to the Orange County Waste 'District's "C,h*w Acres" systems of reclaimed water should this supply of water be available. Craw irrigation serrrlces shall be installed to ease this transition. _. Interior water conmirvation meaaures shall be utilized. Low-flow plumbing fixtures vW water presmv regulators to limit down-atream pressure to a maxlmurn of 60 psi shall be Installed i 1J> awlcdn eott qsi ►sly itt; all lkdscapel areas. Mulch applied on top of moll will firhove the 1N►xtni`�h�,ieing capacity of the soil by reducing evaporation and soil compaction. Use O rvioue wing ma tidal whenever feasible to reduce surface water runoff and t aid in ground water recharge. T1m, da ieioper shill provide, information to occupants reeprdirng' benefits 'of low water usesag landscaping and sources of addltional assistance in selecting Irrigation and larid�a�i . Coat I,ak*ft,end grades to discou Me water waste through runoff. �[lydmizeWe of lar"s sued utilize warm season4 drought tolerant grasses. As t eve went tee, no 'permi is for ncy shall be issued until 8"0001. WSW s WHU' :are detailed in the 1988 Water Masjjr Plan ate impletmonte:d a�ad uDt� l do,:R=0601i ffill_boostOr station and distribution system are: complete:•and , r 46 04U, laf ct!R 'i of t1a City Water Depar eat. r t As t 000u;rr,a11 construct °to the isswnc e a use surd Occupancy ,mits t da�reriopef '� t the teary ureter senesce lines to individual t' '.:fAn ��dsr akoineent ~66ping , prior to approva] of future, Wiling permits, � CMWMt* l bb*e and irr4atiosn- plaro shall be submitted to and approved by the W4AW.Dgartmpn+.. f, ' iball caorityt the Water t�ivisiort of the city's Pudic Works t ieett duri desllpie aruced c�arnrtrti ctlexr p'�ases f`vr further water coiaemtivn mew tp review irrigation designs and ht taleratrt plant use Solid Nut• R,sroaal To s,eduoi tha propmed projects iinpacts on Waste disposal facilities, project designs sue, + ' � a e of. reducing the amount of waste generated both duff rt 'Ion Whin the ject is in use. The wMe i tion pram sM11 be =MO rdC actor prior to issuance of bulkRN permits. Potential cte 1 include implementation of recycling p `ams. lintena�e lr�trc'tscaPtrg(i.e., native vegetation iastead of turf). Ube 4Oveloper shall oontact Rainbow Disposal dw ing the design stage to ensure the roost Oftialt ape economical 'seans for rubbish removal. The design shall include rubbish encloiwr , projected travel area, and turnabouts where necessary. Pa c�� ar ! 1OU TD bests the fonowins Biases be included in site plans for the proposed project in order po rt the transit service and encourage,transit ureae. Mij;nth bw p at.southob W Gldenwest Street/nearsi+de Ellis Avenue shall ra be ted t 6 fai" Alit Avenue. YA bus turnout, If, determined by.the C,ltty Traffic Engineer to be necessary based on r mf*ay�q u section, travel volumes or speeds, shall be provided at this burr stop loosttkxL a a&M to this turnout shall include a paved passenger.'welting area Mophiete with a bA Ater and bench. " l trd agile p estrian aces way shall be pr6Aded Ow-:xwz te pmjwt bdldk*.& ate bne pad a fciiltt to stvp rt ttse weight of a bus (see'oCTDN' ilk son ►.' hare' to be Ovvided at the .trait "stop. 1O � 'tom mmti al rased to cow. ct Galdenwast Street ee be at o supia rt continued'tiraneit use of the bus stop. WW" Its sham mat' be approved tbr,davelopmont for the subject proWty nr ,City Stakiew.,datersuUmd that seerat facilities are available at the time j at�rpp rtioa► for such.aewmr permits and will contirm to be available until time of i AD• . � ' . • Ate .= � , r A slavekpr wt $trod $tall be creamed to be utilized fug- the construction of adequnte sewwap for the development of the project site. The developer shall pay his "fair-share" towards the construction of adequate sewer facilities to service the site. No Tentative Tract Maps shall be approved for development on the area tributary to the $hater Aver-us Pump Station (refer to Exhibit 31) until r44onstruction of *fie tw Avama Pump Statioti is completed or approved by the County Sanitation tsa►�nt. 'his davalopar shall page conrAwtion fees to either .CSO No. 3 or CSD No. ll, tt w1Mcr higher at the time of connection to County Trunk lines. sto Ea as The developer shall pay his "fair snare" towards the construction of necessary dreirr V culverts. Prior to approval of building permits, Ellis; Avenue shall be raised approximately 10 feet to accommodate the proposed drainage culvert construction. C ntruction of racessary drainage culverts shall be accomplished by the developer prior to approval to tentative building permits. Prior to approval of building permits, the developer shall c cwtruct any nacauary deteadon'tedlities to reduce the peak run-off from the site to -the approval of the City Engineer. Natural Gas BWkftg cot'rruwdo'tshall oompiy4 with the Enersy Corservatica StaoUrds eat forth in Tithe U. 16f, the California Adtainistrative Cade. It,is st recommarkled 'tlwit the developer consult with the Southern Cstifnrnia Gash Commy Dwift the biking design pose for lurtbw ec wsy conxervattvn tea. •. t3fnE trust on cha1i oamplY with the EnwV Conservation Standards set forth In Title 24 of the Califonnia AAdrninistrstive Code. it is stragly recommended that the developer coroult with SCE, durins the building of design phase for further energy cmervation measures. a T'a,...l.e Lalle The develoj� null submit lGTAE building plans which, will enable GTE to assess the i ai,F,ements necessary to prtMde service to the project site. is1 • .V a 1 AL EF'FELMS WHICH CANNOT BE AVOIDZD If fROJZCT Lemma 0 will rMit in ttue conversion of Ito acres of land to r kbntisl equestrian rind oil affibloub,:sue that are at a much greater degm of development than what is persently Findt,ngs I and 3. Facts is $uvort of Findinfre The significant affect has been substantially lessened to the extent feasible by virtue of the following iaitigation measures identified in the Final SI]t• and inaotlporated intd the project. All potential biWmv and tesof onsite residences shall be notified of the effects , reAdtt �i a of si to oil production activities. The notification shall ` Mt the frequency and locations of maintenance and service operations. T'he ' tss ration she cats that noise levels from oil activities may also sirdficantly Inaem during these times. �'Ito U u of 'building permits, the a0lidants shall demonstrate in a ma>snar ettatrt i cty to ttu ►, that service vehicle access to all rema eper$ting all watt w4te li not arocur through the existing or p�ropased resiiden�tracts. A'3f-M0 ot.h16 out rats,, natural wood fence shall be erected on either ride of all oettte eK1M trails to separate this use from ether onsite us". t kf t�ect The project will restnit in short-term aesthetic impacts associated with grading activities. a ' f Y� • •P 1, INMI t ',} ♦Y R i fir. !'iediu�s 1 and 3. . � �Cto i pup ctt of hindipga o O fto fivant affect h6s been substantially leeeened to the extant feasible ,Or virtp4 of the fo11 u$ mirtilgation measures Identified. in • the Final NTR' otatoA iolo the project. As rOWIVin tip P-0-1 Servk= and Utility section of this EYR, all Utility line$, I Hutt Klgrt llneltled to, electric, telephone, street lighting and cable television, � ble *sad wtWn all arras. The applicant shall be responsible for with this requirement and shill make the necessary arrangements with I , the utility Oompanies for the installation of such facilities. TRAFMCULCULATON 1 Tb prod iect w1ll rim+ult in the pneration of a""Ximstoly 70200 ADD under the General F'hA brd dout. The Zane Chanp/Spectfic Plan b 4dout will rosult in 5,340 ADT. The VMJdot will result to reduced Levels of Service S) for traffic in the project vicinity. hVien eatatioon of 01018tion Meamw Will reduce cumulative impacts to a level of 1s»t0tlratts, C for betted maumt f� the Yc-Ictown Avlenue/Goldenwest Street inter winch is con*Wed ai &pt (LOS ID). e t and 3 h The i di tieetat offset has been eubotanti.a ly presented to the extent feasible 9 by vI rtue 'of the fcllawia$ w&t1gration Hsu res identified in the Flual SIR- and ftteoirporated into the project. ' Y i ■ •9r �Gµ�j M ' ^ + � �7r.Wp��1�. •;,,' �� a:.M As fawnRt► 04'1, NCt1 IN entitlenwAt for a ­1Mo 1 F" Shia CMtruc t street imp mmmernts requhvd per Public tea' rerq�tir+ eats steed in the Table r as may be detee mhW by the City. V relMtb 'seen at is req dr4d, asreements may be entered into by the developer wid they City to p rwAde the reimbme:me:nt mechanism. A WSM e4MI shall `,e installed at- Edwards Street/Garfield Avenue when a deveW.sent 1 MWers the intersection in excem of warranted traffic vO;umW i=d the CalTraas Traffic MWW. Thew traffic stg:na>: shall be lnstesllad prior to the dem mtrated -need and the underVvxW owidtd a "11 be installed WI* rite nuw road Ration cccstr=ticwL Now 8iltnifiCaq��#� , CanetrWtion notes will occur as s result of proposed dm7elopment onsite. Fingln jLs Findings 1 *ad 3. bets in Smart Of Findings The significant affect has been sub3tantially lessened to the _extent feasible by virtue of the following mitigation -measures identified in the Final HIP.- and incoiporatsd into the project. . Coratruction work shall be conducted only between the hoirs of 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. lrtan� Saturday at mandated by the City's Noise Ordinance. No construction shall be allowed an Sunday's or Federal holidays. _ 51gaijamt.-Ef fact Ic a related to helicopter name: from over--fllgh' t of residential arms will ocudr as a result of the p wosed development cratte. .1, bin dings-,a and 3. u i OL• 1� t MM" I I ' �. Facts in Sup,port of FindiM The significant effect has c"?an ati ,)atalLtially lass red to rho: extent: feacibl.e by virtue of: the r'ollowing ,Ati.gat: on measuren identified in the Final. RxR• and incorporated into the pz'^4oct. Prior to approval of future tract maps, the applicant shall submit an acoustical analysis of the proposed development, prepared. under -the supervision of an acoustical engineer. Potential -noise sotwccF: to be analyzed shall include traffic-generated noise, helicopter overflight a 1 noise resulting from operation of onsite oil wells. The analysis shall inckde IL-1kc tssion of the potential need for noise attenuation measures and/or noise ba:-rierc, around oil wells. This analysis shall - , be submitted to and approved by the Plarm i:: When final. site plans and nonstructioa drawings have been prepared, an acoustical analysis of residential development within the traffic-generated 60 CNEL contour and within the area impacted by helicopter overflight shall be prepared to insure that the noise critet;a have been met. Construction plans shall be reviewed and approved by an acoustical engineer to certify acceptability prior to the issuance or building permits. As future tract maps are approved under the Speefle Plan, full disclosure to all potential homeowners onsite shall be provided regarding the potential for noise generated by onsite oil wells and by helicopter overflights. HMROLOGY/DRADFAGE SISSificant T F-fect The projwt will increase the amount of Imperviaas surface which will increase n1noff and erosion. P ind_ njLs Findings 1 and 3. t Facts in Support of Findintco The significant affect has been aubstantially :lessened to the extent feasible by virtue of the following tiitigation measures identified in the Final SIR- and incorporated into the project. i r f Precise hyl•o:ogek. tend drainage design studies shy. . � he p,-epare d prior to the approval of futize tentative tract maps. 'These studies shall provide mitigation programs to minimize, the runoff impacts on developed and undeveloped properties �.-'Jjacent to developing tracts. All devices, drains, etc, proposed shall be: designee{ in accordance with City of Huntington beach and County of Orange standards. The drainage plan shall include an analysis of runoff impacts to surrounding properties, increases in the quantities of water, increases hi water volume flow :peed, impacts to drown stream receptors, locations of grease traps, siltation control, on and offsite erosion, and any other information required L;; she City Engineer. As future development occurs, prior to issuance of future grading permits, erosion control plans shall include measures such as the following: -- Diversion of offsite runoff away from the construction site; — Prompt revegetation of proposed landscaped areas; — Perimeter sandbagging or temporary basins to trap sediment; and — Regulur sprinkling of exposed soils during construction phases. These mitigation measures shall be approved by the Regional Water Quality Control Board and the City of Huntington Beach prior to any construction activities. EQUESTRIAN Siguificant Effect The displacement impacts associated with the project may effect facilities Countywide. Findinga 2 and 3. i .I i Si.gpnifwicant Effects , Long--term displacement of City equestrian facilities will occur with the implementation of Scenario 1. Long—term displaoement of City equestrian facilities will occur with the implementation of Scenario 4. 'findings '} Finding 1. giinificant Effect The prvoow pmiect will contribute to fl-tw. eum►ulative lase of equestrian facilities. Find.L As FinkLass 2 *ad 3. -; s .For :,Facts in Support, of Findings please see discussion of Equestrian facility within EIR No* W2 and following discussion of project alternatives, h r ' r t w 4M PUBLIC SC RVICIES/UTILITIES Sign'ificanL Effect The project in conjunction with ocher past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects will coutri.bute to .3n incremental demand for water supplies. With the uncertainty of water supplies in the Southern California area becoming a major concern, other developments in the area will definitely he impacted. Cumulatively, the project' a- contribution to the increased demands for Water supplies is considered an unavoidable adverse impact. Find_ '!nge Findings 1, 2 and 3. Facts in Support of Findings I Y+i!^YYY. The significant effect has been substantially lessened tn the extent feasible by virtue of the fallowing mitigation -measures identified in she Final glR- and incorporated into the project. The following water conservation measures shall be Implemented as required by state law: a. Low--M sh toilets. b. Low—flaw showers and faucets. c. Insulation of hot water Nees in water recirculating systems. d. Compliance with water conservation provisions. of the appropriate plumbing Landscaping shall use only low water demand (drought--tolerant) species. Irrigation systems which minimize water waste shall be used to the greatest extent possible. Such measures should involve such feattwes as the following: � a. Raised planters and bermsn$ co in r n,�ut►Ctian with Closely spesced low vOlurne, JOW angle (22--1/2 dogma) sprinkler head. b. Drip irrigation. c. Irrigation :/stems controlled automatically to insure watering during early morning or evanig hours to reduce evaporation losses. { d. The uses of raclsimed grater for irrigated areas and equestrian trails. The pyract de:volopers lZa""ItnendwWatte t V�ld range: County Waste District's "Crre:en AYcres" "stem of this supply of water be -available. Separate irrigation neriices shall be inxtalled, to sale this transition. ldteriar wa#er owdam ion rmewwm shell be utilized. %ow—flow plurt V:IX fixtures and water preoswim r eplatom to limit down-stream lure to a maximum-of 60 pal shall be installed do IIIA� a-. S is Use mulch extensively in ai: landscaped areas. Mulch applied on top of soil will i improve the water—holding caparity of the soil by reducing evaporation and soil compaction. Use pervious paving matey ial whenever feasible to reduce surface water runoff and aid in ground water recharge. The developer shall provide information to occupants regarding benefits of low water use landscaping and sources of additional assistance in selecting irrigation rand landscaping. Control slopeis and grades to discourage water waste through runoff. Minimize use of lawns and utilize warm season, drought tolerant grasses. As future deve'opment occurs, no permits for Occupancy shall be issued until additional water supplies as detailed in the 1988 Water Master Plan are implemented s and until the Reservoir Hill booster station and distribution system are complete and i operating to the satisfaction of the City Water Department. As future development occurs, prior to the is:rsance of Use and Occupancy permits, the developer shall construct the necessary water service lines to individual residences. As future development occurs, prior to approval of future building permits, complete landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Water Department. The developer shall consult the Water Division of the city's Public Works Department during design avid construction phases for further water conservation measures to review irrigation designs and drought tolerant plant use x f a 3 •.i ' k ' WIN& ; .w PROJECT ALTERNATIVES' The Draft Ear evaluated alternatives for the. proposed Ellis-Cold enwe9t Specific flan. The project has been refined during the course of the public review through a series of actions including but- no limited to those listed below. 1 . The City staff analysis of the Plan. 2. Refinement of the land uses based upon meetings between the City staff and Planning Commissioners and members of the community. 3. The responses to the comments on the Draft EIR. flhnliq�E 1. The above described plan has been prepared and analyzed to a tatnner so as to provided for the greatest public invvlveaen.t in the platlnir►g and CBQA process, 2. The planning process has developed a land use plan that is in confor- mance with the plan under which the fttied of Preparation was issued and the Draft EIR as prepared. 3 . The Mitigation Kessures and Standard ; City Policies and Requirements have been soda a part of the land use plan. d. %lat following provides a brief description of cbe project al.ternattvas. 5. Tha alternatives were reSected in favor of the current project pro- posal. i 6. ? lio rationale for rejection of each alternati.va is provided below. mg Proimat �trnaciva The, bro Project Alternstiws would retain, the site in Its existLn$ condition. FL"d a FLudlnR 3 - Specific economic, social, or other considerations nabs infeas- ible tl�a pro•j e,e t'a No project Alternative identified in th* Fin&2 Ell and described •boor in that: 1. %U pro j`rat wovild not provide btiausisS opportunities to met t b* local mad regional donands. ti r . ill► not allowing the dovelopftnt the project, development dostawds ovule still *slat. Those dwrteds ".-Pula create iapants aiallar to those "Ga rlod to the !'teal SIR. r +r+M i 1. Thu No Development Alternative would -not provide roadway irnprovements to the community, 4. The No Developmenu Alternative Would nut meet t1le planning and design ab j eotivss of thn Project prnponent. 5. The proposed project repressnts the hest mix of use for the site, bet- ter than the No Project Alternative, all factors considered. 6. Significant effects of the preferred project are acceptable when bal- anced against fgcts met forth in the Statement of Overriding Govelder- ations and stated abova, and are more acceptable than, those anticipated from the No Project Alearnsttve, The No Development Alternative assumes the, existing ' . City General Plan remains in place and the existing agricultural coning remains unchanged. � Fittid3hgs Finding 3 - Specific economic, social, or other considerations' make infeas- ible the projeet'o No Project Alternative identified in tha Final fIR and described above it that; 1. The No Development Alternative does not provide significant housing or empi"ent opportunities to meet local and regional demands . 2. The No Development Alternative would not provide roadway improvements to the con"Unity, 3. The. No Project Altarnativs would not meet the planning and design objectives of the project proponent. 6. The proposed project represants the beat dir of use for the site, bet- ter than the No Development Alternative, all 'factors considered. 5. Sipificaet effects of the preferred project are acceptable when bal- anced agrirmt, faces set forth in the Statement of" Overriding Goosi,der- stions and stated above, and are wore acceptable than those anticipated from the No Development. Alternative. r taaeed�P �r.�t. _retie�a3tt The fteveased Density of Development assumes the proposed andiwe-high and Ugh doulty residenit:W designatiorm are developed as medium density. . ..E& \ 1 Findings Finding 3 - Specific economic, soci&..r, or other considerations tgake infeas- ible the project's Decreased Density Altexnati;vs identified in the Final EIR and described above in that; 1. The rs4ucticn in density of the project would reduce the pro j act' s f"albility tc provide infrastructure to the project area. 2. The Decreased Density of Development Alternative would provide tower roadway improvements to the community. 3. The Decreased Density would not maot the planning and design objectives of the project proponent. 4. The proposed project represents the best mix of use for the site, bet- ter than the Decreased Density all factors considered. 5. Significant effects of the ptrsfe;rred pxojact: are acceptable when bal- anced against: facts set forth in the Statement of Ovet:ridi.ng Consider- ations tnd stated above, and are more acceptable than thous anticipated from the Decreased Denalty Al.t:arTiative. �I flternative Location The Alternative Location was rejected because it was found to be environmentally Inferior to the proposed project. r I A.TTACRKM 4; RESOLUTION NO. 1414 A RZSOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMISSXON OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADUP'TING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT RIEFORT NO, 88-2 rOR THE ELLIE-GOLDENWEST SPECIFIC PLAN ZONE CHANCE NO, 69-1 FOR THE 160 ACME AREA BORDERED ON THE NORTH BY ELLIS AVEMM, ON THE SOUTH BY CiARFIELD AVENUE, ON THE WEST BY EDWARDS STREET AND ON THE EAST BY GOLDENWEST STREET. WHEREAS, the Ellin-Coldenwast Specific Plan 's related entitlements and Environmental Impact Report. No. 88-2 have been prepared; and The City of Huntington Beach was the lead agency in the I, i preparation of the Environmental Impact Report; And � All persons J.nd agencies wishing to respond to notice duly given have been heard by the Planning Commission either through written notice or Cari,►g a public hearing on March 21, 1989 , and such responses and comments as were made were duly noted and responded to; and The Planning Commission contemplates and directs continuing compliance with CEQA and the guidelines as necessary in the implemntation of the phases and laments of the project , and Thin Planning Commission 'by thin Resolution edopts Statemnt ,of Facts ;end Statement of Overriding Considerations as requir6d by SOCtion 15091 and 15093 of the CEQA Guidelinea , K N, THEREFORN, BE IT RRSOLVZD by the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach as follows : SECTION 1 . The Plannir_q Commission does hereby find that Environmeental Impact Report No. 88-2 has been completed in 9 compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and all state and local guidelines therefore . i SECTION 2 . The Planning Commission has considered all significant effects detailed in Environmental impact Report No . 88--2, together with existing and proposed measures to mitigate such significant effects . (Exhibit A) SECTION 3 . The Planning Commission further finds that through the implesmentation of the aforementioned mitigation measures the majority of the potentially advarse impacts cta associated with the Ellin-Coldenweet Specific Plan can be I eliminated or reduced to a level of insignificance. SECTION 4 . The Planning Commission finds that the benefits accruing to the city, both economically and socially, an 6Ncatelyd it the Statement of Overriding Conditions (Exhibit 8) , override the unmitigetable effects detailed in Environmental Impart Report No. 88-2 and the attached Statement of findings and Facts in support of Findings (Exhibit C) . URCTION S. The Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby adopt and certify as adequate Environmental Impact Report No. 88--2 and recommends that the City Council adopt and certify as adequate Environmental Impact Report No. lli--2 . 4 , 1>7 �2- (22i1d) t own 1 r PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington beach at a regular meeting thereof held on f the day of 14881 by the following roll call i vote: i AYES: WOES 6. .ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: i Mike Adame Ken Bourguignon Planning Comdosion Secretary Planning Commission Chairman i 1' j y, q1 1,39 � - (2$61d) EXHIM I A SrATEDENT OF OVERRIDING CONSWER.ATIONS the California Environmental Quality Act� y requires a public agency to balance the benefits of a prC90ded project against its unavoidable environmen�al risks in determining wig, " ,r to approve the project. The City of -Huntington Beach has determined that the unavoidable risks of this project are acceptable when balanced against the benefits of this project, giving greater weight to the unavoidabl: env!ronmentai risks. In making this determination, the following factors and public benefits were considered or decisions ,nade: L The pressed project is co-,,.:intent and compatible with other existing and proposed uses in the vicinity of the project snd community in general, 2. The proposed project will contribute to Improvements to roadways, 3. Roadway Improvements to which the proposed project will be required to contribute an equitable share will add roadway capacity and will thereby aid in alleyiatirg E existing traffic congestion in the City. 4. The Intensity of the project is appropriate for the location. S. The project will provide additional housing within the community. This will allow residews to move to the City of Huntington Beach rather than remain in or move to other employment areas. b. In view of all factors they project represents reasonable uses for the project area. 7. The majority of impacts associated with this project are regional in nature, and the project's cumulative and incremental contribution to those trupacts is considered minimal and acceptable from a regional perspective. S. The project will be designed and landscaped to as to provide an aesthetically pleasing environment compatible with surrounding land uses. 9. The overall planning of the proSoct in comprehensive and interrelated, not planned in a plecomeal fashion. Impleri mitation of the Ellie-Goldenwest 5peelfic plan will: 10. imago send maintain a well-balanced variety of residential densftic� and u+tcr+oarded living environments by encouraging rational use of the land and other natural rcea. 11. Allow for Estate Residential with equestrian amenities. IZ. PrwA& idequate internal circulotIon and minimize direct access off of adjacant i;�rterirb. DON i 13. Encourage an internal circulation system that conforms to the site-Is natural topography and provides view opportunities where possible. 14. Encourage coordinated dasign of development and Improvements (i.e. roadways, fencing, landscaping) to enhance visual appearance. 15. Preserve significant topographical features and minimize alteration of natural terrain. 16. Provide for continued equestrian uses. 17. Create a zoning classification of a specific plan for this unique area. f �I�N •• .1..•`��.r y•."fit.- •, � ,?• -i t' � D •�•- ry4� aG1. 7+'O.J't�ry'_ .,t,.._. a.r„� .:.. �.,. I _ 1 IL tAAll A Qi:'�(f fit •„ 44 - / -♦� '.. }} w - ¢F �.S ', } ) ].:fit � � C, � d IdyJ���•! -� yAyi .l �a Y yI � .�is�a 1 :� ��7Vi I'� ". •- 1 -'1',^ - t� tl�' �S. • q`a- ) p n w r q•J i n • ri ,r'- /•I+�,� t IS '. �\4C.. `�•�yJ_ ,A,_,I. .� .� `�,f ^" �I f -_'1•: • � ♦''F. lr�. ��1•) -♦ °A.t 1}�Y��Ys L �it!'�•J P ��,fN ��N tM1''.�y�} _l�r� • - -t '- y... - ,} f � J,+.' Shy; •1, r - t� - ;l.. ....-- ., MEAN w T •. . taric r � want✓ wn"rNG ' OXX CHkMz No. 89-1/=DX J1WNDlMNT NO . 09-1 IN CONCURCTTUN WITH DRA!"f ENVtROMEIN' AL IMPACT RRPONT NO. 86 2 I (Resone 160 acre, qurrtersection to Ellin-Goldenwest Specific pla,i) NOTICE 19 HXRXD'� Q1V9N that the Hut,ti.ngton Beach City Counci 1 will hold a *blic hearing in the Council Charttec at thi Huntington Beach Civic cantor, 2000 Main Straot , Huritin-rltnit 0e5C1 , CA11tornia, (in the date a:rd at they time, i.n-licated below :u receive and consider the nt:atenonts of all persons who Mists to be heard :-ilat:ive to the A1�plic�ik�,op deaat; bad b�11►ow,,, •t I Tt Zone Chong* 'NO . k9--1./C046 A,oevidMefnt tto. 89-•2. in conJunction with Draft Environmental Tmpact Report: - ����: Ci t7 of tiunt:i.ng:'.Jn 08RCh t i5o *or** located in the southeast quarter of Section, Area J4 , township 5 Sout;:, Range 11 Weet, boundaid by E111a Avenue, Rdwards Street, Garfield Ave»ue and 03oldenwest Street (see attached map) . Mixture! of Ah (Residential ltgricultural) ; Q--91 � (Qualified Lori Density Residential) ; M1 (Light: Industrial) ; and LU (Limited Urge) . (1) Zane Chug: To reanne the subject prdperty from a mixture of Rh (Residential Agr:icultural) #, Q-R1 (qualified Law Density Residential) : M1 (Light industrial) ; and LU (Limited Use) to w Ellis•-Golde,nweat SPOCific Plan . (2) Q40 Amaniim=6. To amend the Huntington Beach Ordtnance Code', Article 930, and establish the Ellis- Goldanween Specific Plan. , `229=AL TA=19it ProjeOt covered by Draft Environmental Impact Repport 81o. 88-2. The City Council must c:esrtiEt draft Env�iror., nta1 Impact No. 86=2 prior to e,prroVS1 of Salle Chan94 S* 00-1 and Code Arcendpent No. . 89--1. � A col y. o the proj"et to on- file in the Community, Dove apowAt blepat tk4st . I 11�rL 'I 1R$ "L'� Prism are Invited ,to attend said hearing and exptibas, opie3atfia sale ' &uWdt evidence for or against the application a out+lin�d abovei. ,, All .&#Olidationa, . exhibits, And descriptions of t is proposal are ca ftl*' With the OgfIcet of the City Marko 2000 ftitt-Stroot , Huntington Sodidh, :Calif inia; for inspaction by the ptiblid. Ht)]I'1'Yelf. 1 AQ CXTY WwcIL Nib►l 1:05"a atroi:kwaY Cit t1ork � , .•, .. . thy; ����,1,;��a-��ag � I � , '4f � ' ' -Tc a s4,Ila 1;1 n VIE I R 11 IW-wZ 7 t I. f14 •, ,,Iy, I c I ;. r..M•.. •, .. �. ryj , •� �iQ+I'YCy''4`�' �iat,I C Hitt I e#U `�� OKA (,HARGE NO. a 9.1/CQDU 4MENDmzV r No. a q-1 IN CONJUNCTION WITH �? DRAFT 2XVIROMMENIAL INFACT RES)RT 110. 88-2 ,'� " y (ltosorte 160 sate quartor"action to Ellin-•Goidenwast: Specific Flav,i) i � I NOTICE 10 MMEVY 01VER that the Huntington Beach City Council wi l I hold a public hearing In the Council Chamber At the Hunt: ngt:on Beach C#vle CMetstp 2000 Main Strnat- , Huntington Reach, California , oh :•lie elate and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all I►orsona who wimp to be heard relat:iv� to the { applicotion dssor�"d below, *Aay.' Way 1, 1969 , -'/ : 00 PM_ Zone Changes No . 79- :1,/.:crde ARien1ril lit NO. B9-1 1n conjunction with Drafi: ri-ivirolirit:ntal Impact Report No . 00-2 I�1CL'r.1i�': City nef Htant- ingt:on heF ic.h I �Q t: 160 ;&cres ioc•ut:e:d in tho : rut;beast quarter of Stcctign, Area 34 , Township 5 Sough , Range 11 heist: , bounded by rills Avonue, Edwards Street , Garfield � I Avenue and ► %,lder:west" St.recst: (nevi att:ache,.l map) . mixture of 1,A (Residential Agrit:ultural.) : Q-R1 _it`ted X,cw 1)rns t:v Rnr,* dent`! it !. ) : Ml (Liight- Tndustrial) ; and 1,11 (Limited Use,) . Qp � ( 1) Zp1*_ChA1Lg0: To rezone the subject property froo, ` e mixture of Rig (Residential Agricultural) ; Q-Rl ` (Qval►ifiecl Low Density Residential) : Ml (Light Industrial) ; and W (Li-mited Use) to Ellis-Coldenwest Specific. Plan. (2) de Amend jam: To emend the Huntingt,c n Beach f ordinance Code, Article 930 , and establish the Ellis- Goidenwest Specific Plan. project: covered by Draft Environmental Impact Report No . 88-•2 , The City Council must certify Draft Environmental Impact Report: No. 88-2 prior to approval of Zone I Chang%i No : 89-1 and Code Amondment No . 89-1 . A copy of the project is on file in th.- Comununity Development: Department . j ALL INTERP.18TED PERSONS arN invited to attend said hearing and I express opinions 4r submit evitience for or against the application as outlined above. All applications, exhibits, and descriptions of � this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Hunting',.,on Dcach, California, for inspection, by the public . HUNTINGTON HEACH CITY COUNCIL I By: Connie Brockway 1 � City Clark Phone: (714) 535-5405 i I I i i i 1 i I VA Wa me AM 1 CA 89 � ' & e ' 'r r +tire;'�'r.�' • J „ ( L . I�olryiSrrtt5C1 IZl Puf7�rSft .4llvt(rirsurr,rJrrr;, OI ell A,n►�� r%ILtvr�i'�Q f�uV1rC ncltresa by 06CF00 of IN% SuVotror Court Of Or 1 .,to i;ounly, rpl �t✓A, Nurnral A•67 1/ (lntecl 'P 5hplernher. 1361 ArIQ STATE OF C:feALI!:ORNIA County of OIanile P,.t.l< ti�n�� �.nrl.ruwrecBrwe.1 G, 11-6 pM-ik" is 1411 41 1 pVMr1 .rrl', 1O pKM rMWMP stir 111 t am a Citizen of Irl? Url;ied States and a roslrlent of the Gounty afarr;.said, !earn ovor the age of eigntcen years• and not 4 {party 20 or inlerested irc this below entitled matter, I am a principal clerk of the Orargo Coast DAILY PILOT, with which Is combined the NEWS-PRESS, a newspaper of a*endral circulatl n, 6, printed and published In City of Costal Mesa, Courtly of grange, State. ur ;alifornira, and INN a Notice o. i of which copy atlached hereto !s a true and curnplete copy was printed and pub:Islhed in the Costa 10asa, Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Fuuntafn Vahoy, Irvine, the South Coast communities and Laguna Beach issues .)f said newspaper for ._._.,1 t ilTe i corlseCutel•e veers 10 wit the issue(s) of 1 195.__ _...,.._. _..._..__ 198 1 declare. under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. ExeGu'ad on - April 1 , 198 9 at Costa Mesa. California. Signature PROOF OF PUBLICATION w� r lc. DA1-� PILOT PUBLISH DATC _ �/1 U .^ LEGAL NOTICE: ORDINANCE NO. 2998 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY Or, HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE IiUNTINGTON DEACH ORDIMANCE CODE BY AMEND.TNG SECTION 9061. TO PROVIDE CHAit SE OF ZONING; FROM RA-O , 1.ZA-0--CU , I,'J-O-CD, M.1-Cu, Q-R3.- ( z . 7 ) -0-8 , 000 , Q-:t1- ( 3 ) -- c , 000-CD, Q-111- (3 ) --8 , 000-::D TO ELLIS--GOLDENWESST SPECIFIC PLAN CIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN THE 160 ACRE QUARTERSECTIO BOUNDED BY ELL-IS AVENUE , ED'WARDS STREET, GARF IELD AVENUE AND GOLDENWEST STREET ( D I STP.I CT MAP 3 6 ) AND AMEND 114G ART TCLE 930 DY ADDING SECTION 9300 (d) EI,LIS.-GOLDENWEST SPECIIF IC PLAN i SYNOPSIS: (Ellis-Golden_west Specific Plan) ORDINANCE NO. 2998 AMENDS THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE TO ACCOMPLISH THE FOLLOWING ZONE CHANGE AND AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE 930 OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE: Zone Chan e: To rezone the subject property from a mixture of RA es1dent al Agricultural ) ; M1 (Light Industrial ) ; and LU (Limited Use) to Ellis-Goldenwest Specific Plan. Code Amendment: To amend the Huntingtcn Beach Ordinance Code, r't�c. e M, and establish the E1 l i s-Gol denwest Specific Plan. The subject property Is: 160 acres located in the southeast quarter � bf ec on, Tren 34,1 nship 5 South, Range 11 West, bounded by Ellis Avenue, ..dwards Street, Garfield Avenue and Goldenwest Street THE FULL TEXT OF THE ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE A00PTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at adtourned regular meeting held Monday, ..,L� 7-6 1`i' .� Y e following roll Call vote: AYES: Councilmembers: MacAllister, Green, Winchell , iinister, Erskine NOES: Councilmembers: None ABSENT: Councilw tubers: Mays, Silva (out of room) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Connie Brockway City Clerk won% ^EXHIBIT A i DRAFT EI, LIS - GOLDENWEST SPECIF1:: PLAN City of Huntington Beach Department of Community DEvo-lopment Planning Division fr Approve ay 1, 1999 J r.✓ by Git ouncil ..!,I/ M P' .,4) TA.III-E Of CONT EN l S 1. INTRODUCTION A. PURPOSE 1 D. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES C. PROJEC'T AREA DESCRIPTION 2 II. APP'LIC<':TION PROCEDURES A. ENTITLEMENTS S B. SPECIAL PERMITS 9 I III. GENERAL PROVySIONS A. PERMITTED USES 10 B. C:IRCULA`CION 11 C. COMMUNITY THEME 14 D. GRADING; 19 E. ENVIRONIv ENITAL CONCERNS 19 F. HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION 19 IV, ESTATE RESIDENTIAL DEV"E'LOPMENT STANDARDS A. PROJECT AREA 21 B. MAXIMUM DENSITY 21 C. ESTATE RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION 21 D. ARCHIT,ECTURAL FEATURES 22 E. RESIDENTIAL EQUESTRIAN FACILITIES 23 F. OIL ACTIVITIES 26 G. CIVIC DISTRICT 26 H. MISCELLANEOUS 26 V. APPENDICES A. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR EXISTING SUBDMSIONS 29 B. DESIGN GUIDELINES 31 l . r I LIST OF EXHIBITS �>r paU IViOnivy Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2. Specifics Plan Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3. General Plan Designations . . / . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 a. Existing Zoning . . / . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 5. Arterial and Collector Street, Profiles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 6. Internal Collector Street Circulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 7. private Street and anterior Trail Easement Profiles . . . . . . . 1S 8. Open Space Corridors and Trail System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 I _i ' t • ti, .t { i,• lfY;RODUCT1t7"r A. PURPOSE The Ellis--Goidenwest Suecific: Plan area has been the subject of special planning for a number of reasons. First, it is they largest area in the City designated for Estate Residential development and its such requires special implementing ordinances. Second, the area is close to significant open space and recreation areas including Huntington Central Par). to the north and the Aolsa Chica lowlands and proposed Bolsa Chicu Lineitr Regional Park, to the west. This location, in combination with the: area's natural topography, creates unique opportunities for views, open space and recreation areas to be incorporated into development proposals. Third, the area is a focal point for equestrian activities j in the City and, with proper planning, can continue to accommediite tr.ls use. The area contains oil resources and continued access to this rennurce is an �. important concern. Lost, there are a member of constraints in riie area such as existing single family residential subdivisions, the lack of public works facilities, i and the diversity of property owners and parcel sizes, which if not addressed through the planning process could result in l0ece.meal, un(:c► )rdinated developments. The purpose of this Specific Plan is to implement the Estate Residential general plan land use designation and to coordinate all development in the Ellis-Goldenwest quartersection by way of a comprehensive strategy tailored to the unique characteristics of the site. The Specific Plan wit) permit estate residential (single family detached residences) on large lots with sensitivity towards the existing topography and provide equestrian amenities within the quartersec:tion. Many properties in the Specific Plan area currently have an RA, Residential Agricultural, zoning which allows only one dwelling unit per acre. Existing; estate residential subdivisions have a qualified-low density residential zoning classification which requires equestrian amenities within associated subdivisions and estate residential development standards. There are three areas In the Specific Plan area which have been subdivided Into small lots (sometimes :alled encyclopedia lots). These small lots have an LU, Limited Use zoning designation. Limited Use zoning restricts use of the property to farming, grazing, trails, orchards, greenhouses, picnic grounds and other similar uses; residential uses are; not permitted. The Limited Use zoning also has a minimurr, 10 acre protect area requirement prior to the establishment of any of the permitted uses. Another property in the Specific Plan area has an Ml, Light Manufacturing, zoning which Is not consistent with the City's General Flan. Development on this property can not be approved until this zoning is brought Into conformance with the General Plan or until the General Plan is amended. 1 (OS2SD) r I'M i B, GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Upon adoption, the Ellis--Goldenwest Specific Plan will be the zoning for the entire quartersection. It will allow properties currently zoned RA to develop at a higher density than currently allowed. It will allow the properties currently zoned MI and !.0 :; ,aevelop as residential in a mamler which is consistent with the General Flan land use designation of Estate Residential. The general location of the Specific: Plan area is depicted in Exhibit 1. The rollowing goals and objectives for this Specific Ilan incorporate policies from the General Plan. 1. To encourage and maintain a well--balanced variety of residential densities and uncrowded living environments by encouraging rational use of the land and other natural resources. 2. Allow for Estate Residential with equestrian amenities. 3, Provide adequate internal circulation and minimize direct access off of adjacent arteri,:l.:. 4. Encourage an Internal circulation system that conforins to the site's natural topography and provides view opportunities where possible. 5. Encourage coordinated design of development .and improvements (i.e. curvilinear streets, fencing, landscaping) to enhance visual appearance. 6. Preserve significant topographical features and minimize alteration of natural terrain. 7. Provide for contt iued equestrian uses. 8. Create n zoning classification of a specific plan for this unique area. C. PROJECT AREA DFSCRIPTION 1. Boundary — The Ellis—Goldenwest Specific Plan encompasses the area generally bounded by Ellis Avenue to the north, Edwards Avenue to the west, Garfield Avenue to the south and Goldenwest Street to the east as depicted in Exhibit 2. 2. Site Characteristics — The Ellis-Goldenwest Specific Plan includes 160 acres of primarily undeveloped land. It is characterized by gently rolling topography with two pronounced ravines which traverse the cev.tral and eastern portions of the area. The two ravines collect storm water runoff and convey it into Nuntingtoo and Sully Miller ►.ekes. Significant oil reserves underlie much of the area. 2 (082SD) n AA /` WARNER V SL4TEH AVE i -- TAIBERT AVE EUJS AVE I f' GAAFM AVE r- N Project Site AD" AVE M �r 1 sr } Vicinity Map Exhibit 1 3 (0779D) ..91b C1 i C F -.1 E-] I "TAM POST at! n El_LIS-GOL. ENVIFST SPt=CFIC PLAN i smw c a. Vill allow an overall density of 3 units per acre. < oil i Z GARFELD AVENUE Specific Plan Area Exhibit 2 4 (0779b) r 3. _Q&itmL_J!Ju -• n-io City'r. General Plan desigimtes th;r. northern portion of the specific plan .:rea for estate residential development at three dwellin$ units per gross acre. The southern portion of the area Is designated as estate residential at four dwelling units per gross acre, (See Exhibit 3). Because of its natural features and resources, the Specific Plan area Incorporates planned open space corridors which is consistent with the goals and policies of Open Space and Conservation Element of the General Plan The open space allows for residential developments which maxiall re the area's open space benefits by incorporating open space Into development plans. 4. FY09Jn8_Zoli1ng — Existing Toning within the area consists of a mixture of RA, Residential Agricultural (IOR acres); Q--111. Low Density Residential (30 acres); Ml, Light Industrial (2 acres); and LU, Limited Use (20 acres). All of the study area has oil production suffix zoning which allows terviclng of producing wells and reactivation of Idle wells. All properties with frontage or! Ellis Avenue or Goldenwest Street also have the — CD, Civ;c District suffix which requires any development on these parcels to be reviewed by the City's Design Review Board, (See Exhibit 4) 5. E",tj "and Usp, — With respect to land use, the majority of the study area is utilized for rail and natural gas production and appears vacant except for scattered oil wells, storage tanks, pipelines, and service roads, Approximately 30 acres are presently developed or approved for single family residential developments. Between Edwards and Goldenwest Streets, one temporary comm.rcial horse stable occupies approximately S acres and a commercial nursery occupies 36 acres. 6. FxutttWs Circulation — Arterial access to the Specific Plan area is currently provided by Ellis and Garfield Avenues and by Edwards and Goldenwest Streets. l-ter-na! circulation within the area is limited and consists of segments of Improved streets within existing suhdivisions and a network of private dirt roads that connect oil wells. The lack of adequate Internal access in the study area is a result of land having been subdivided without dedication of right--of—way for access and public streets. The provision of a coordinated system of circulation is a major planning concern in preparing an overall development strategy for the Specific Plan area. S (0920) dbb.1 G on�ur.� � !; Lj� �t► �.rr•Yrr Y 11 ,• E:I_I.19 AVFNItf-_ _ t13 ESTATE RESIDENTIAL (:3 DU/AC) ......:.: ..... . ESTATE RESIDENTIAL LAJa� ';�'�••�.d.':'::�•:./•;.Y':.�;��'••r i. ate.+.. r:.'.:r• i•i:' • • a (•• II••a�'•":1,'••�•:•'f%:`•�:•1�.�1 I:I••i:.I'r i.::r•::r�r�./ I.: L�' .••�a-�' �•'•L•1•�4:1.••+:':'ti.��,•Lam.....a.a�• .•+..i...'•a•i'':..r.. •• 1 �11•� :••••f•:•�•La :+'.+�{•::::.:a!;•YI;LI f':•i'.:' .•.`.' .' .•:.'.�.,•�. •i , ti4�. r •f ti 'i:+ tia •�i}.�a`�+:�::a:.•':a;::`::.•': �.:i.i::•'.:':.:•i • /"1r►a.::i'•'•.�•'•:•a��•i i i��i:•''�`���:;����:i�:::i`.::i�i•i l i:i'i�i�il':�'�:'.• i 1 • •:•••��•qY,..ti+i••.,�4.�;' •J•;.•'i i:Pl.':i i:i:'�':::..�.�i •�'..:••ti+::a...•..... �y,�qT ~+' 'a•h�'�ri+i. {':•.•�::`::y:'1�•.':•i�•:�'i�•:'i�':i•i:':�Yi:•:•i':•:�i'•� r�.'.'r�:�:i�• rwr r.+rw.+ �...14a".ail'L^��. tia ♦ •.��''/:'i�it"•i i:Iai:::•:�a'.•••'Al:::'::::::�:::''.•1':.'i+'i•+':JI�•�{•,aYi'dr �• •1.•••aff•+ii'',-+ f /••�••• •.a Ir:' :..•.;.`...'..;.'1:1':1••�•�.�:..1`1'r•.1.1 i•. ' .: .7r Lti. a .'.�:••. •: • ... .....:::r'i• :•.•. i ti •+;rlS• 4Y.'�•�,f.. ... •: •Y•Y•"fir;:: .• � .. ::, F• ti • •� •• / '•i• a :••i•Li`•i'i• :•�:::':•�Lip:''::•�• '::• ••'i:: • ::�•�: Y♦ ti • •+ •are•�/•�•'�•�•• •� ••�• : :..:.. ...:'.��;.',;/:••'�':'••:' a.• •. �.•+ .a..;a:.i•':•::+.•L:.:.•• ...•'.a. . ifs'•.•;Ir♦r,r/.I, .. . ... • ••fir•• ..�..I,a;i;1�'. .i a :'':':• :•+..:1'.:'•�:i..:'. 77 is r I;r L•�tS •�r.. : .:'f�::r. :L r .: : ..'a:'. :'.•'': �. �1,.•.•..ti•... La'.tiff.•.•:. ..:.•��.+.L�� .;.,.,i..... •:�::,.•. :;::•:.•::.. :.:.::. .. GARw��.o AVENUE IF 1 F i General Plan Designations Exhibit 3 (0779D} Ya � f . I�.lf• E (PRUONEO) CO 'OCD 1?CO • MI•cD - C U led pie so RA1. 11 IH�Ir...�. _.���t •!�� a 40 Project M • F Site a �r�' Y • , � +� a �.��. i Rp.O• 1 h 1ft 7R ' A-01 RAI 0 _ { i tRA A MO ' • '' r�•a�co 111M MA!1� ►hr fr111 /IM' lam' 09 ' ©A 1 1 \ LT -0 ,� CI-0 Mt -al RA-o� -ca Existing Zoning Exhibit 4 7 t�8z5I�) r A41 I ! V n. APPLICATION PROCEDURES A. ENITITLFMENTS I . All requests for development within the Specific I'lacr area shall require the approval of a Conditional Use Permit and Tentative ^"Iict Map pursuant to the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. The Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Tract Map application4 shall be bul nmttted concurrently to the Department of Community Development. Tn addirlon to the standard suhmittal requirements, applications for CUP'S small also include site plans, floor p!►ns, elevations and cross--section profiles for each lot. Tentative 'Tract Map applications shall include all existing trees within the proposed subdivision and a rough grading plan shall be sut incited `,rr the entire subdivision depicting existing and proposed grade elevations. Lot Sale programs shall provide conceptual site plans depict!ng building pad locations, cross—sections of each lot and private open space arras. 2. The Subdivision Committee shall make recommendations on such projects to the Planning Commission for approval, conditional approval, or denial. Prior to project approval the Planning Commission or the City Council shall also consider the following: a. Protects shall be In conformance with the Specific Plan and the adapted Design Guidelines for the area. b. Architectural features and general appearance of the proposed development shall enhance the orderly and harmonious development of the area or the community as a whole. C. Architectural features shalt he Incorporated into the design of all exterior surfaces of the buildings in order to create an aesthetically pleasing project. d. Front and rear setback should bc: varied in order to provide break in bulk and interesting street scenes. 3. Amendments or revislona to a Conditional Use Permit (master plan of development) previously approved by the Planning Commission may he approved by the Commission pursuant to a Site Plan Amendment with public hearing. Prior to approval of the Site flan A;aendment, the following findings must be met: a. The revision shall not constitute a substantial change. b. The use of property shall remain the same. C. If residential, the dwelling unit density shall remain the same. d. The revision shall result in an improved development. e. The revision shalt comply with all applicable provisions of the Ellie-Wdlenrvest Specific Plant and Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. $ (n#2SD) Y • rm r. N 1 M4� ,T • SPECIAL. PERMITS I. An application for a special perml� rearlrresting deviate.. from the pmviaions of this Specific P17n may be filed with the Department of Community Development, and such application shall bc; heard concurrently wi*bh the Conditional (Ise Pormit and Tentative Tract Maps applications. Deviation frorn the development vandaf its up to 10 percent may be granted ' at the: tune of approval of the project by special permit. Special permits shall not be granted for exceeding maximum dimsity or minfi-nion project area. The Planning Commission may approve the sly+'��iF;) r,irit application in whole or in part ulx)n ra Firrciir►g LIM L the proposed deviation will: a. Promote better living c►,vironme.nt; b. Provide better land planning techniques with maxinium use of p landscaphig, sit-2 layout turd design; i C. Not be detc+mental to the general he-a th. welfare, safety ,.rein convenience of the ne;pl,borhocO or City in general, nor detrimental or injurious, to the Va.luv of property or imprcvemccnts rr th tieighborhood or, of the City In genleral; d. Be consistent w;th objee ivea of the c1tate, F�esid.-ntlal develrpment staodard,� in achiek,ing a project adapted to the terrain and compatible with the= surrourding environtitent; and e. Comply with state anti/or federal la%v. I 9 (0925D) Fir, ` r r w '1 M GENERAL PROVISIONS The Ellis--Coldenwest Specific Plan shall be subject to the definitions contained In the Huntington Beach Ordinance Cade. The following general provisions "ll apply to all development projects: A. PERMITTED USES 3. The following uses are permitted subject to the approval of a Conditional. Use Permit (and Tentative Tract Map for subdivisions) by the Planning Commission: (1) Single family detached dwellings, one unit per lot. (minimurn 8,000 net square foot lot size; minimum 15,000 net square feet for 20% of the lots) I (2) Land subdivisions intended for lot sale programs. b. 5pg Sgaw r. �tSisui (1) Private .recreation area for the exclusive use by members of a homeowners asscclatfon group. (2) Private recreation area or uses for exclusive use of homeowner's). (3) Commercial equestrian facilities subject to the commercial equestrian facility development standards contained in the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. (4) A three to five acre neighborhood park within the quarter section which may include equestrian orientation. (1) Public School 2. The following uses are permitted subject to the approval of a Use Permit by the Zoning Administrator: a. On—site equestrian facilities in conjunction with single family dwollings (requires minimum 12,000 net square foot lot ,size). b. New oil walla and oil consolidation projects shall be permitted subject to applicable provislor,s of the Eluntingom Beach Municipal Code and Huntington Peach Ordinance Q-4e. 3. The following um are permitted: a. Continued operation, reworkinf; and/or drilling of oil wells active at the time of adoption of this Specific Alan shall be permitted subject to applicable City Regulations. 10 (0825D) 4 arF r 1 ii 4�,M b. Accessory buildings such as private garages in conjunctlon with mingle family residential dwellings, C. Open Space corridors. CIRCULATION 1. &Ser,likl Sty , Direct access of residential streets a,. s too arterials shall be limited and subject to the approv, i of Public Works and Community Develroprnent. �l a. .RiWt-- AU,...Ai.t -A .. Additional right-o - \ -�atiUil may be required at the time of project development. Als along arterials will serve to link proposed the Bolsa Chica Linear Regional Park and Huntington Central Park trails i?.nd will be incorporp.ted into the Orange County Master Plan of Ifthig ai;d Eliding Trails. Garfield Avenue and Goldenwest Street public rights-of•-way shall be dedic:atQd and developed In conformance with the City's street design standards subject to the approval ar the Departments of Community Development ane, Public Works. Future improvern+e;tts or realignments to 'Edwards Street and lllis Avenue pubiir, rights-of-way shall be offered to the Cit;/ for dr.dicatIon, b. $ a ��Lrt=JLJ1. A, lands aped area shall be provided adjacent to arterials (Garfield, Ellis, Goldenwest and Edwards) subject to review and sppvoval o," the Departments of Cn- mmunity l Development and Public 'V or':s. The arterial landscape easement shall, Le ti minimum twenty-•five (2s) feet in width and shall contain a minimum eight (8) foot w'de equestrian. trail (see Exhibit 5). Building setbacks shall be taken frorn the intc-rior landscape easement line. The landscape easement area shall he privately maintained. c, T m�rdr y As=2, k, 'I'(:mporary acces,- may be taken directly off ar! arterial provided that: (1) the temporary access is approved by the Departments of Public: Works and Community Development, and (2) the developer pasts a bond w4th the City before recordation of S final map sufficient to cover the costs of removing the temporary access. The Department of Public Works will determine the amount of the bond to be posted. Conversion to the approved permanent necesm point is required upon completion of the necessary local collector streets and/or arterials to planned ultimate alignments. 2. Collecter 5trftJA. Internal collector streets shall be constructed in conformance with the conceptual alilpiment shown on Exhibit 6. Said stremts shall be developed in accavdance with the requirements of the Department of Public Works. A l t..ttt eMat Call .. Direct access of private driveways to Internal ,1!ectcr tt!'=164 shall be limited and shall require the apprcrral of the Departments of Public Works are,; Cans nturaity Development. b. &Jba -k■�.(ram latt'S W Collector Strom A lsndscappe/e+questrian +' trail setback easement area shall be provided adjacent to all Internal collector streets as depicted in Exhibit S. (0820) 1 r'e 'v °n ! E �r S 'r ,r r f Parkway 'i'rr�il f g� 1 5 � 1 1 .2 � 25 , 216. I ArCfa! jed Strµat Profile � t r 7r'zsi! Trail 10 8 8.* 104 42 1s Collector Street p's-ofile Arterial and Collector Street Profiles Exhibit 3 1 ?. (082SO) L V ' %t r w pJ i �1 1 BTU r N r F- w 3 a O 0 GARFIELD AVENUE i 'i...J' ACCESS POINTS Internal Collector Street Circulation Exhibit 6 1. 3 (0779D) I' r t; ti The setback ea3ernent area shall be privately owned and maintained. All fencing within the landscaped setback area shall conform to the fencing provisions of this Specific Plan and Design Guidelines. C. B g = rI llgctor S�eeta. The internal collector streets shall include an area which can terse as a trail link for development projects which do not have direct access to the public Qpen Space Corridor and can also serve as an omergenwy Barking area. d. Litarim figaiere, An interim barrier shall be placed at the location depicter! in Exhibit 6 subject to the requirements of the Police, Fire, Public Works and Community Development Departments. At such time as the internal collector street within the central S acre parcel area is fully improved, determination to retain the barrier or not shall be made, All property owners within the 160 acre quarter section shall be notified In a timely manner prior to a public hearing before the Planning Commission, I 3. Private W-cats. Residential streets shall be privately owned and maintained. Said streets shall be improved in accordance with the conceptual design standards for residential streetf.- dep+ct,ed in Exhibit 7. All streets shall be curvilinear if feat ible and shall coru<<in a five (5) foot wide pedestrian easement adjacent t-o the curb. 4. rMU11. Recreational circulation shall conform to the Orange County Master Plan for lAkewRys/traits. C. COMMUNITY THEME 1. QR.en ,pace C�� i�rs Omen Space Corridors shall be established as depicted in Exhibit S. Development within Open Space Corridors shall be limited to recreational trails with appropriate fencing and public works facilities and utilities. The open space corridors have been designated as primary components of the overall drainage system in the quartersection. The Open Space Corridors shall follow to the greatest extent feasible the alignment of the existing natural drainage swales which traverse the area. The Open Space Corridors shall be held as common open space by homeowner asmiciationss, The open space corridors shall generally be delineated by those areas below the fifty (50) foot contour. The precise dimension and location of the Open Space Corridor shall be subject to review and approval of the Departments of Community Development and Public works.The corridor shall Include a minimum easement dedication of sixteen (16) feet for a public equestrian/ recreational trail. The equf+trign/ recreational trail shall be setback a minimum of twenty (20) feet from any habitable floor area. 14 (0820) � 1v- --- - 1 w • , Y i My Pedoctrian Casament Pedestrian Basement a 42 Private Street Proffile r •• 1'raii 4, a. 4, 25" 25 Internal Tra41 Prof Ile Private Street and Interior Trail Profiles Exhibit 7 15 (0925D) y '•. y p1 G , y Ono 2Cam moo Arealff Common open space and private streets saliail be guaranteed by a reatrietive covenant running with the iond describing the open space and Its maintenance and improvement for the benefit of residents of the development. prior to recordation the developer shall file with the Department of Community Development, with the final subdivision map, all legal documents which will provide for restricting the use of common spaces for the designated purpose, as approved on the final development plan. The City may also require that the homeownf is association relinquish all development rights in common areAs to the City. All common improvements including but not limited to trails, project fencing and common open space landscaping shall be completed by the developer prior to the sale: of any lots and/or units. All lands to be Conveyed to the homeowner's association and/or the City shall ks. subject to the right of the grantee or grantees to enforce maintenance and Improvements of the common space and public trails easement. �I 3. landscaping-- Landscaping shall meet the following; requirements: Landscaping shall be in conformance with the adopted Design Guidelines for the area. a. All setback areas fronting on or visible from a street shall be landscaped and permanently maintained in an a ttractive manner. Such landscaping shall consist primarily of ground cover, trees, � shrift, and other living p..:nts. Plant materials shall be drought resistant. to, Decorative design elements such as fountains, pools, benches, sculpture, planters and similar elements may be permitted provided such elements are incorporated as a part of the landscaping plan. C. Permanent automatic irrigation facilities shall be provided in all lana_.caped areas. d. On-site trees shall be provided as follows: one (1) thirty-six (36) inch box tree for each residential unit or the equivalent of thirty-six (36) inch box trey as provided herein. Seventy--five (75) percent of the total requirement shall be thirty--,six (36) inch box trees and the remaining 25 percent of such requirement may be provided at a ratio, of one (1) inch for one (1) Inch through the use of twenty-four (24) tech box trees. Additional trees and shrubs shall also be planted to provide a well-balanced landscaped development. e. A distinctive landscape area shall bo: provided at the corners of arterials*for enhanced landscape treatment subject to the requirements of the Design Guidelines. The area shall b-r greater than the general 25 foot perimeter setback and the perimeter fence shall have a 45 degree angle at the corner. 16 (O825D) - - _ r 77-7 k 4. fArA&walls and Hedw Fekleen and walls shall be in conformance with the adopted. Design Guidelines for the area. a. Front vend fenneea. Fences, hedges and berms shall not exceed three and one-half (3-1/2) feet in height may be located in the front yard setback area provided that the fence is a wood picket, wood rail, wr+wght-iron or other similar type, Fencing is not permitted within five (5) feet from back of curb. b. Side and hear Yard, goes, The use of solid fencing including wood, pours! Concrete, concrete block, brick fences not exceeding six (6) feet in height may be located on the required side or rear yard r property liner. Wrought iron or other similar type of see-through ' fencing may be used in conjunction with swimming pool areas, subject to review and approval :y the Department of Community Development. C. g; jp#err c_tion Yis fI(ty. On corner lots, no fence, hedge, wall, sign, structure, mound of earth, landscaping, or other visual bFtn,r'rinn between forty-two (42) inches and seven ("r) feet in height above the nearest street curb elevation, shall be erected, placed, planted or allowed to grow within the triangular area formed by measuring 25 feet from the intersection of the front and exterior side property lines, 'frees trimmed free of branches or foliage -so as to maintain visual clearance below seven (7) feet are exempt from the above prohibition. d. if gigbt -_ asureMent cif Fence sir Wall. The height of a fence shall b as defined in the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 5. an Iraila A minimum sixteen (16) feet in width public equestrian/recreation trail easement shall be dedicated to the City for a public equestrian/recreation trail. The equestrian/recreation trail easement may be reduced to twelve (12) feet subject to the approval of the Departments of Public Works and Community Development. All developments must provide trail access to the W.n space corridor or primary equestrian/recreation trill subject to review and approval of the Department of Community Development and shall 6e in confoi monce with Exhibit S. Equestrian trails shall be improved in accordance witty the following standards: a. Tread width shall be a minimum of eight (8) feet. Trail tread area s,aouid be glradcd smooth, free of weeds, stumps, roots, debris and large rocks. Adequate drainage shall be provided when grading. b. The trail shall be clear of all obstructions from ground level to a height of ten (10) feet. 17 (O87S0) d I I Ir� f ` II 1 • I , I ELLIS AVF(IUN i i;j -1� 1 e •r ' r 'y • � i t + r s ' w tr LU . • + t.. _ In I v i i i e 3 I M e + i r 0 r 0 a • • • a a • r r • J + •` ! • 4• Y E a • • {� r —� GARFIELD AVENUE r ti;c?h' Op911 space .0000 Lquaatirian Trail i Open Space Corridors and Trail System Exhibit 8 III 18 (0625D) limb + ti C. All trail fencing shalt be subject to the provisions contained in the Design Guidelines. d. interior equestrian trails shall conform to tfie profiles contained in Exhibit 7. D. GRADING Lituited grading may be allowed in Open Space Corridors for trails, access bridges or to enhance the open space character of the area subject to review and approval by the Director of Community Development. A 1982 reference topography contour map shall hd on file with the Department of Community Development in order to establish topography prior to development and to resolve land use issues, Grading activities for development In other areas shall not involve: more than a two foot cut and a two foot depth of fill from existing topography as depicted in the 1982 topography contour snap. Minor deviations may be permitted subject to the approval of special permit. Grading plans shall be subject to review and approval by the Departments of Community Development and Public Wurks. i Thcae provisions shall not apply to grading for roadways and drives nor for oil well cellars as required by the City's (ail rode. All structural designs shall fit the natural land forms to the greatest extent possible. Use of terraces and split level structures ,hail be encouraged where appropriate. E. ENWRONMENTAL CONCERNS Refer to Environmental Impact Report No. 88--2, F. HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION All developments shall submit a regal instrurnent(s) setting forth a plan or manner of permanent care and maintenance of private sewers, pipes, facilities, drainage swales, recreational areas, communal facilities and private streets. No such instrument shall be acceptable until approved by the City Attorney as to leg-: form and effect, and by the: Community Development Department cs to suitability for the proposed use of the open areas. Dedication for public equestrian/recreational trails/easemetits shall be offered to the City and accepted by the City only after all improvements have been made. 1. Common open space& are to be conveyed to the homeowners' aswlation and the developer shall file declaration of covenants, conditions and a restrictions which will be submitted with the final tract map for approval, which wlil govern i)e association. The provisions shall include, but not be limited to, the fold, wing: a. The homeowners' association shall be established prior to the sale'of the last dwelling unit. b. Membership shall be mandatory for each buyer and any successive buyer. C. The "n space restrictions shall be permanent. 1 q (0825D) d. If the development is constructed in increments or phases which require one or more final maps, reciprocal covenants, conditions, and restrictions and reciprocal management and maintenance agreements shall be established which will cause a merging of increments as they are completed, and embody one homeowners' association with common areas for the total development. e. Membership shall be mandatory in the Master Homeowners' Association or similar mechanism for maintenance of all common Men space areas. 2. Regular maintenance of the arterial landscape and equestrian trail eminent, collector street landscaping and equestrian trail and interior equestrian trails and other common areas shall be the responsibility of ki Master Homeowners' Association or similar ciaity. The precise meehanisrn for establishing a maintenance program for :he entire quartersection shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney, Community Development Department and Public Works Department. , f I I I' 20 (0825D) P '7. `? < IV. ESTATE RESWENTIAL DEVELOPWNT STANDARDS A. PROJECT AREA Thee minimum project area for any development proposal shall be ten (10) gross ages. A project area may consist of nor,-Contiguous parcels provided each subarea is a minimum of five (5) gross acres. 3. MAXIMUM DENSITY The detwity of any project shall be a maximum of three (3) units per gross acre. C. ESTATE RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISItON f' I. Let Am. All lots shall contain a minimum of 8,000 net square feet of area. Twenty percent (20%) of the lots within a subdivision shall be a minimum of 15,000 net square feet. Estate1equestrian lots (12,000 net square feet or greater) should be located ,adjacent to a designated I equestrian trail. 2. LQt Wld1h aA.d_.Et!Qn . 'The minirnum lot frontage shall be seventy-two (72) feet except for cul-de-sac and knuckle lots which shall be forty-five (45) feet. 3. Lgve_„=. The maximum site coverage shall be thirty-five (35) pendent of the net lot area for multi--story structures; forty-five (45) percent for single-story structures, 4. MazimuUu=n& Eleisb . The maximum building Height for main structures shall not exceed thirty (?0) feet or two stories as defined in the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. The rnaxitnum building height for accessory structures shall] not exceed fifteen (15) feet. 5. Scibilck Rcqujranieri.4. All main structures shall comply with: the following minimum setbacks: a. Ergnt Yard. The minimum front ,yard setback shall be twenty-five (25) percent of lot depth provided further that laic! front yard setback shall not be less than thirty (30) feet from back of curb and need not exceed forty (40) feet. Front yard setback shall be measured from back of curb. b. 31dt, &W. The mWegate side yard setback on any lot shall be a minimum of twenty (20) feet; thea minimum setback on any interior side shall not be less than five (5) feet, and on any exterior side not leas than 10 feet. C. BoL YW. The minimum rear yard setback shell be twenty-five (25) reet; except lots exceeding 13,000 square feet shall be a minimum of 50 feet. Rear yard setbacks for lots abutting arterials shell provide varied rear setbacks from twenty-five (25) to thirty (30) fret, d. & o C,our_e. Patin cowers may be constructed to within ten (10) feet of rear property line. 21 (062sp s w� ; �. � ItWRen . The minimum distance between the main structure and accessory structures shall be tan (10) feet. a. Ergot XRrd. No accessory building shall be located within the front r half of the lot. b. Side UrA. The minimum side yard for accessory buildings shall be five (5) feet. C. Dear Yad, The minimum rear yard for accessory buildings shall be five (5) feet except when adjacent to an equestrian trail where the setback shell be a minimum of ten (10) feet. I 7. Private Qpen Sp=. A. Each lot shall provide behind the front sett: ck line a minimum usable open space ari-i on the grou;id of twelve hu: dred (1200) square feet with no dimension less than 20 feet. b. Private open space area shall not exceed a ten (10) percent slope. 8. Parkinr cuirements, All developments shall meet the rninimurn off-street parking standards of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. In addition to the parking provisions contained in the Huntington Beach Ordinpnc;e Code, the following shall apply; a. All dMrelling units shall contain a minimum three (3) fully enclosed spaces plus three (3) open Rpaces which may by in tandem with the enclosed spaces. b. An additional parking space sha?1 be provided for each bedroom in excess or four (4) bedrooms which may be covered. 9. Eaeplignt. Developments on lots within Final 'Tract Maps 11473, 11805, 11769, 13036, 13210, shall be exempt from this subsection and subject to the requirements of their respective Conditional Use Permit (see Appendix A) and appropriate provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, R: zoning district. D. ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES The creation of an estate, equestrian theme and the maintenance of consistency itt architoctuiral dltardeter stall be addressed in the project design. In reviewing pni 1! �'ti, the Planning Commission shall look for the following design features. 1. Street lights and street signs on collector and private residential streets and trail signs shall be co!raistent throughout the Specific Flan area. 2. The use of natural building materials, textures and tones, such as rough wood sidinS and/or stonework shall be encouraged. i 22 (9$25D) F F' r 17 1 n ' +d �OW9 drivew�, pratiess etc.) xM11 be dedgnad as an � ar�hitecture. Kt't4d` in d Ot be low the a S and 12 pitch. � ` Y•, raingtttakdwpouts, ve5. n= and other rtof t pr0► �.Oe to be finished to match the adjacent materials and/or i! 11 6. Architectural screens other than fences shall appear to be an extension of the svwtm wW designed to create exterior privacy. 7. Roof protrusions such as root-mounted air conditioning units and solar err,, collectdr panels, shell be located away from'the entrance street frontage and screened from Via* of•street rights-of-way. M Architectural pfiiiiing site layout and structure-design shall take full '. . advantage of passive energy efficiency features, such as natural heating ¢ and/or cociffl, run arA wind exposure, and solar energy opportunities. a'4 9. Acceasor'y buildi* shall be architecturally compatible in design and t materials to'the main residential dwelling unit. E. RESIDENTIAL. EQUESTRIAN FACILITIES The intent of Als section to to establish standards foie the 'stabling of horses in a manner which will hot er kr,gger the health, peace, wind safety or the'community and which will assure that horses are kept in a clean and sanitary condition. It is further the Intention of this article to provide for the regular inspection of horse facilities to anure healthy stable management. 0. No horse shalt be kept, stabled or tethered on any parcel without prior approval cf a L1 permit subject to the standards listed below. b. gl ,ZU. �No horse shall be kept, stabled or tethered on any �ess' than' 12,000 'net square feet in area. Q., Num r'nf 1lorses.''j she following number of horses may to kept on an lndividral residential lot: ___Jdt size (net) 12,000 up to 14,999 sq.ft. I 15,060 up to 19,999 sgrftr 2 20,000 up to 29,999 aq.ft. 3 30,000 up to 39,000 sq.ft. 4 40,E sq.ft. or greater 6 In addition, immature offspring up to 12 months old may be kept on the lot. 23 (082513) r ti r ' ud r� u Aiik r d. . The setback shall pertain to all structures that relate to hones but not limited to stalls, eocrals, arens.s and fly-tight 'W taNWO , excWt pastures or gsing areas. Setbacks may be d ! structum and owrxI area: liubject to fludings and appr ►e1 Q!'` a Use Permit based upon proxiMlty','to trails and abutting residential urea. The following setback requirements for stables shall apply: (1) Ftm. The front yard setback shall be a miriimurn of fifty (50) feet. Interior Side. The interior aide yard setback Aall be a minimum of twenty-fide (25) feet; except minimum ten (10) feet when abutting an equestrian, open space or other similar easement. (3) Elterior Side, The exterior tilde yard setback shall be a minimum of fifteen (15) feet. (4) Hm. The rear yard setback shall be a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet; except minimum ten (10) feet when abutting an equastrian, open apace or other similar easement. (5) fd&wgl. 'All paddocks end box stalls shall mairitain a minimum distance of fifty (50) feet from,any dwelling unit other than a unit on the subject property which is used for human habitation. e. Qum. Each corral shall meet the following requirements: (l) The minimum size paddock shall be 299 square feet with' a minimum dimension of not less than twelve (12) feet and shall have a five (5� foot high fence. (2) Each horse shall be provided'with a minimum of ninety-six (96) :rh! feetof shelter covering with a minimum dimension of than might (9) feet. Shelters shall be sloped sway from CaTals, or rain gutters which lead to the outside of 6.1'ie corral shall be installed. ( 7 Ex::h corral shill be provided with a combination manger and feeder and a permanently installed water system with automatic drinking controls. (4) Corral floors shall be graded to slope away from the center of the corral. (5) In all enclosures where horses are maintained, the land surface of such enclosure shall be graded above the remaining land surface so as to provide adequate drainage. 24 (0825D) 40 ,lift' WAR�7" ` �r �,:.y, •,* �,r;v •; ; ��Sri' �4' , Ri',, + fi. Saw6we StAlli"P sl;ill tat enalnt '11X-,i 113 a Maher that will ptrote'ct t: aed c0ow Mi ntals. A ttkk�shorstndsrrisre shall be itwtalled to �ot publlb wirer supply, t to the approval of the 4 1) Mani of NNW Workat Water Alvision. r , '� ,,, ;;�, � . 'Ply and insect control sha;tl be rAiligantly p PrAc tiQs� 1. Bad"a- tl. It Snf 'upn 'rol shall be dllltently practiced and the; e ntles promiao ishal'I be k6pt -in- in orderly and sanitary mstMer to �y prevent,�possllal+a rodent infestation, The following guidelines and odteria shall be: considaisd in ravlewirg plats. (1) All dry grains 'hall be stot•ed in rodent proof metal ct�ntai+'�ers ' g'nd hay $hall J,e stared iri a covered strunture on a convent slab `pi on ,b raiaad 'wood platform that malintilins a minimum ' Crear{Inca of eighteen (18) inches above the ground. . . (2) Any 1eck equioment, device, subtunce, or m6terial eiiall be ;,. suntd.on racks or shelves at least twelve (12) inche?l above the r flood- aarface.' Tack room floors shell ma' Intain a rnintmurn j cieaArance of �ii� (g) ihrhas above the ground. I WA 0'r Awn 1"4 The following guidelines are provided: (1) An"automatil. shut-off nonleak valve for all tro0ghs, bowls, : cufx and othf3r water sources shall be providtd. (2) ln',�addock and d corrals, the owner shall properly grade the earth surface to 044form to the master drainage plan so boat rain water or wager trough overflow does not form ponds. k. Cdliinuoua dust control of thrs tritire premises shall be r matntalined sled Vbject to applicable provisions of the Huntington Hea&irlunicipel mode. 1. W-MaDaar ual. The management of horse factlitiem shall meet � Ow r4quirements of the Orange Cotinty Heal*h Department to keep armflo neintil p bbl6ms it a minimum. M." E66Cmtvha�t_ The responsible county agency, as designated In the Huntington Beach Mwilcipal Code, ii hereby vested-with :he'duty and authiofty to inspect regularly all hone stables within the city. Rep in and recommendation by ouch agency shall be forwarded to the Dirdcter of Community Development. j I 2S (082SD) � Y I 1/ AV r F. OIL A►CTI1 MS 1. Catatiqueil parissignP fyworking and/or redrilling of oil wells active at the time of eke of this Specifl Plan ahall be permitted subject, to apple lty regulations. a. C limb powerod engines on existing pumping unit; remaining in a dswelopment s1'mYl be ^onverted to electric motors prior to occupancy of the first unit. b. The developer shall establish an interept4werInS account prior to recordation of the final trap to be administered by the homeowner association to cover the cast of laridscaping well sited at the time they are abandoned. The amount of the initial deposit shall be determined by the Director of Community Development. t, 2. New'drilling and,new storage tanks shall only be permitted in specified sites or, "oil islands" as approved by Cohditional Use Permit. The oil apersto, Mull own or have a lease, on subrutface mineral rights covering an area of s minimum of twenty (20) contiguous acres within the Specific Plan boundaries for every one oil island requested. Before a permit for,new drilling is issued, the oil operator shall specify the exact location and Lize of the proposed all island (generally not to exceed two and one--half (2 1/2) acres in size) suhW.t to the approval of a Conditional Use permit. a. Fencing around the perimeter,of all oil islands shall be set back twonty (20) feet from any arterial highway ar Internal, collector street and fifteen , IS) feet fmm any residential street,private, praperty line, or common open apace area. The setback area shall be landscsped in accordance with the standards set forth in the City's Oil Corse. G. CMC DISTRICT The requirements of the civic district overlay shall apply to all parcels located itectly adjacent to the Huntington Central Park faciltty,and shall comply with the provislbns contained in the Huntingtohleach Ordinance Code. H. MISCELLANEOUS 1. VehIeWat&arM. The covered storage of boats, trailers, recreational vehicles or other similar vehicles is allowed only within the rear half of an � Individual lo:'and is prohibited within any yard abutting a street right-of-way; no open storage is permitted. No Commercial oversize vehicle or especial purpose machine shall be parked or stored in any portion of any yard area. Common areas for storage of boats, trailers, recreational vehicles and other similar vehicles may be provided for in the, development plan. Where such areas are provided, they shall be enclosed and screened from view on a horizontal plane from adjacent areas by a combination of six (6) foot high masonry wall and permanently maintained landscaped area. 26 (OS2SD) �f R. �if w 1 •I� M +`T;yry, 1, ` 1' / w u { Pk mob , •'fi. I 2. am is a Win . it 812411 be unlawtbl to 00"Ou11ct, area or k"ie t1404fe y bed ding on any lot not Navin ' a po k0ble resiatlal bW for commercial sgimtrlar,�acllltles. 3. M The develoW ft al] an air-alte'lightinS Mery on all �r wean ways and skm ma* walkways. Such lighting shall be dltredtexd ottt,o deFiv+cways tend wa-Ikwayv within the dovelopmant and sway f ' ftis went propw des. 4. l K &W 1_ ater ws r s. Sewer and water systems 0411 be designed to city sta t* and shall be located within streets, easements or drives. In 10 re em doll individual sewer lines or sewer mains for a dwelling unit be permitted to extend un&rneeth any other dwelling unit. S. Em Hxdmat Swam. A fire hydrant system shrill be installed to provide an adequate fire now. a. The fire hydrat►t system 11 be dedicated to the City. Private fire I : hydrants are prohibited. b. The adequacy of such system steal i be approved by the Fire Marshal, Plane shall be submitted and approved prior to the issuance of tuildIn$'permits, and any fire hydrant system shalt be in operation prior to the time of construction with any combustible materials. 6. Sego. Where appr oprlat% the developer,shall install o"ite street name signs at this intenectioni of streets, as approved by the City Engineer. All signs rkuired by this section shall be installed at approved locations prior to the time the first dwelling unit is occupied. 7. Ima, Preservation of existing;trees shall be required where feasible. Any existing mature treets) that must be removed shall be replaced at a 2:1 ratio with 36-inch box trees which shall be incorporated into the project's landscaping plan. S. Strome ,is. All street improvements shall be completed prior to construction with combustible materials. i 27 (0825a) "All �µ�J*r.v'� 'r• ���� �� � {I ' � ` ^r r' f � "' y`' ' -i , � tJ1� .� ...`L•±�_--- ^"""7� �wa4 r Y rAf f',• «f J04 di i s jd1 ^� I�� �ry,�� � hr� �•�� �y•• 'iy�� ii {i1 1�' �'r, :� �✓ i, f flE ' ? 14, ,�1, r�L • •r I I �' � ��'• �y`�,M y 4'` { r� A. bML0PMZW STANDARDS F' OR ExlsrtNG SUBbIVISIoNS a•7 �Y�S L'r ! 1 fig' y' 5 't. 1 u (0025D) i Avg yy R 01 i �11 !I I fist 1 , � • I � �]Y,,K'*tip •'•�yr tit y r �^ A $TANDARDS FOlt TRACTS 11473, 11505, 117691 1303b, 13210 r N PKM't AIL b, w wittg "tbach within the vubdivieion shall. be as follows: FrmA 11jed S'ettilaM: 30 feet or 25 percent of the lost depth, whichever is 7 Wo O►t dm not r j4d to excmW 40 feet. J 2. (2rd,WjbgCkg: An aggrepte of 24 feet with a minimum of 8 feet: on a 3. Mar. Yid 8cti : 25 feet 4. Zever,, tf it a6 t buildinga are constructed In thefront one-third (1/3) 'ofist, t)Ay shall Omform with the setback requirements of the main dwelling. MaigitllIrfi �, t p 1110 PUmi�;1"3) C j gj ate DIAMU4 setbaOCK wtt�& tie e0divlsion shall be as follows: 1. FX Sagadw 2S feet for front or aide loading garages. 2, i�.,S�da.�'l�stx�,."et„hacic : An aggregate of 1S feat with a minimum of 5 feet an one aide, provided further that the opposite aide yard shall be 10 feet Clear to tim aw. 3.• Ot�X Sashmunk 911he QIjCStgr,S.tr„ad: A 5 foot landscaped,buffer area doll be ptovkhd a0cent wthe equestrian trail. Structures shall be setback 10 feet fiva the landscape buffer; 15 feet from the trail. 4. 8t' XwA Solksk: IS feet S. mYa�k�l��: 25 feet measured from behind the 15 foot wide landscaped buffer. 6. All accenory buil+dinp shall conform with.. the setback requirements of the main dwellIft, 1 29 (0925D►) o ivr � .. I.• , '• rN' .l; ` I v#r�PT a X�e • I ."..'' v " �' - '• ;T+ '� r,'1 yl r {',I 1 • 11��'� r\ I a 1 Lit t�,1ev .I yl A,+, I,,, I • SMr17`9' {M p,fNM•t•y.,,yu.,./1 N'. y , g: low is i tc1e1 jmlr..Mtt,H , 17A Z-HM f,er , 1 sett+#r Wn t division *oil br as fallcwa: , I � 1. fit f " all n,7,, t1i�C'tur : An eSpegate of 15 Net clear to the slay with a .' mhAn= of S feet on is side. w tha ectar 61met: A 5 font landscaped buffer area shall to pWidad,adUarent to the %ftiestrian trail alter a t:nllector street. ` Shaer shall be setback 10 feet from the landscape buffer; 15 feet from �' ttt� tram. •I e. „ : 25 feet for all structures S. BW YordhqA. ck g1ang F.111AAvem; 25 feet treasured from behind the 15 tout wide larl&,caped buffer. ' 6. All accenory buildlgp shell conform with the setback requirements of the main dwelling. 7. EmeroachmOnt of architecturA; features Into side yard setback area shall be ' prOMbiteri. S. Any,develegment on Lot No. 1 shall have a first ataxy setback of 25 feet wid aecor� story setback of 35 feet from the southern pmMrty line. Southeast taci0 rind story windows shall be frosted. Any variances to these regent-etbents shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Commission. 30 (082510) 1 I'�� w ��:, w+� �r .� i •,� ", t � -i .1,'v ,'r,7i.'I I I Ry, �'!'�Mr"I r^', ;f w 1�'�9:7 �' ". - ♦t;��.�r�l r � �,� � � I, w } T y v i� r � �' "1 V I�N4.^ I s"e i rh' � • r'rt• i r �' I g r •.off {'"f 1 y.�'M1�p i w I"1,, � 1r ol d t low.,� r F APPXNMB It � 1 1 , 1 , 1 (DEMON GUMEUMES TO HE AWPTED HY PEWLVTION AT A LATER DATE ,AND WCORFORATED IEREIIV) y. r ' y , IV r •I', Ir•r it 1 , 1 Ir 1 ' i,- • (0825D) , 4'. i Ay1Ad► Ir1 P40W A hWIAGlw U Of ON i<it="Chl"04 ft of f f'op of the t QWW GOO of oven" C&Alr. • fNt>MI M-42 14. dated 19 S"Wh w. 1961, and STATI OF CALIFORNIA tonty of Orange pow N~�+�«•e �««. " " OOM Do$Nowgo* I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the Cwnty stores", I am over the age of eightearl years, and not a party to or Interested In the below entitled mattw. 1 afar a principal ,lark of the Orange Cosh DAILY PILOT, with which Is combined the NEWS-PRESS, a news caper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Costa Meta, County of Orange. State of California, and that a Notice of public Hearing of which copy attached hereto is a true and complete copy, was printed and published In the Costa Mesa, Newport Bosch, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, Irvino, the South Coast communities and Laguns Beach Issues of sold newspaper for i gams consecutive wooks to wit the Issue($) of April 20 198 9-- 198�..... -— — t 198— , 198 lea I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the toregoing Is true and correct. ••L••+�„i�i�rriil Exacutod on _ April 20 , 1989 at Costa Mesa, 0.Califf oornia. � -- Signature PROM OF PIKXATION 47 ti �, yir r a '/friq"',+d' Pv,�,1^ �ti•y� f�r .ler.YA fs 1 iri i t' •� � * � . 13 X I , A 1 y'y •1' '' T rn ., �' 17 .1 r CORRAL NO. 100 *: '"TlNQ'1" M MACH. CA. VWY A NQN*X0F17 Wq$AfflaAflaw r 1 ffkatw to 94mms L8110hedra 4NO!M Aooub tlw o and Nowmis"at RI4Ir4*rm N1trIM Tr6ol 1� March 20, 1989 R , IVED Nir. Bob Franklin, Assistant Planner City of Huntington Beach MAP city mail 2000 ftin Street DEPARTMENT OF Huntington Beach, CA 9264$ COMMUNITY DC:VFL0PN'ENT . RE! draft Ellis-Goldenwest Specific Plan, March 17, 1989 deer Bob: h Thank you for your continued assistance concerning equestrian activities In the c;ty. We ' 4upport the Brasil plan proposed by staff. The perimeter trail will pr�oyli' access throughout the quartersection to the internal trail system, r' CoAtr of Park, 'And eventually the linear Park. It also reinforces the i*skriarn theme and emphasizes the uniqueness of this planning area. We have provided information to the city about successful perimeter traits along arterial highways in other cities. Experience in these communities demonstrates the workability of this concept. Since the equestrian community in Huntington Beach is effectively cut off from direct access to any regional trail system, the plan in the i quartersection, Central Park, and the Linear Park will be the total trail system in Huntington Beach. To clarify and strengthen the trail commitment in the area we suggest the following changes in the draft: Paige,- 1-It INTRODUCTION, GnALS AND OBJECTIVES 7. Provide for continued equestrian use, including partirularly, equestrian trails. Page 111-1 , GENERAL PROVISIONS, PERMITTED USES, Open Space/Recreation Equestrian trails for public use. 'sage 111-9, Exhibit 8 Should show equestrian trails along collector streets, ..LYs sat rmx, fW .� ';.:i„,:Y jyryy` i+�'��+��a3si ; ,a,1Ylr4..�':1. .. .. L• ._ _.. _,... _ - l ., !' u 1Yli 1 ♦' 1 a P• The Si ifleance of this $p"Ific Plan, with its equestrian theme, it t0grit, *kes this area in the city unique, just as Huntington y, RA40 Capitalizes on the unique water envi ronmer,t. WO a�,pnpftOdto the opmrtunity to be involved in the successful e�Clursion of the planning for this area . f , Sincerely, MY L. BELL } Trail Coordinator '' . MLB:Jct u' r f,; j 10 f � � ry1 i r 40 Y a AV , . / t 147 j 17 ` r J 1 l y " a-ter 06,1 4�en- ALI&- �d °. ' � r OLO c • � r 94 11,4 n r ' I w O , a �I ol 41 Ole oe Ott ,a 0100ft1d4 4- A6 p � r r G Ir .d 11�1L t � C I ♦ `a y fi.Y. it,, �,�• (/ � � 010 / / +, II r Aoi- 42.,; d t fry A MG1�NI1l1!!N / • M ,gyp , � 1 aim MrTIMCT'C1t EEC Nr y 4 OP-MMM Nam SAM AVE. LAMI AVE WMAVE >. A was _s ra t id r+ ... r. t , vAcfwty map art I .r �T• i,�'•1 C�N 1 � 0 y�1•,w 1 ' �l• t � 'I!V i .rWFy��I. ka;, ' MAR 2 3 •� OF. i At C-d-� I&A r � J �. C...G:I-r•L +4'4 - ci 01, t�t" r�i � / A•y rA I •J � '1 ,�f,*Itr �Its ' •f, �' .{,I' ,, . . � '�; r� � �','ll', i 1 ' � � �r ` AM'!17/„C y..'W.�AI 1nr1 •M�!'►y�.' � I OOOYOurt 1 • `i r 1 '% ,ri "1.0 r ,�� ��' /' y� 1� 1 r'• 1Y, .'w. - �. I C' „ �'i :r J A ♦ Ai,w f! { , 1 ' � .•gyp•.'% „",.� ,J S`w'l J��,��; IC f�'S' ��•• '/new •a• /r 9 A Sri' r J. . r r ,MJ� .t � F �' '�•;Y'a'li�����!'���r fir •�a w '�i:�„� ' f JJ' �; 1' � V'�. � l�. 1 i f r• j I 'J� I 1 e j''�n�1*��f i f��tl >I r : t � I 11 ,. � ,;• ... _. .r _ -- 17 !1 y `?+, � M r' vL*w and act on anvi ronmata 1 impact Report No . ea-Z. All saggottod mitigation measures r4camonded ir. anvironmmntal impact Report aao a8-2 have bayAn incorporated into the Speciflc Plan . All %obse"ent tentlttsve tracts, if in conformance with the . Ellin-oft1denwest. SWolfis Plan, will be covered by Environmental tapact Report no. ,89-2. d.a:. i Not applicable. s not applicable. Pol xf adopto by lyee City Council; the Ellie-Goldenwest Specific P1a'n { �+ Will tee ariniep dormant which will contain NevaUt E 3dalitoes 1w .` ,.t s4afrds for the entire 160 acc ' Not applicable. Us: , ' Qtt 'y t6, wh ex tbs`.Plsnninq iCom fission 'continued 6 proposed , r 5 : Sdfb !�tl 'c iiMbge M#►� aubdiviSion i (Zone Change Ro. , 88-7 an,Q T*ntativ* 1lfbet,,13260) 'b + .!the Mehl'r �: and directed ' staff ;-io J)��epmre• i . .rbrr166d,'p11i's S"ific Plan and an environmental liftact rerdrt' fee that 240 ibre quastersection. stwlf ..baa� pt6psr6G a' retri'aed Draft' Zllia-Qorldebweat -Bpeoffic ,Plan M 'baa. 6U'pd cv1'srd:1..the pr.*potation of a comp�rehensive- envfiror�ntal : adt ,report' tot the' bubj ct area. * Bated on two public meet inga a 'ntworoos -Neatt a stale and the Eliia-C ldsixWeut Se 6WAt a4 (;a pp4Med f Ca of rsion�rs artega, 8aurquiynaa and Slates) *6*GMUiO6- agencies, prope ty- hwaste r .develo rs and to otbotea. pi ties s state has prooarel! o .reviAed Draft f e + si etereat 04aitic Plan which r'addressex go4lie, palicito and dWVW 'Wrawa►t 0696040 :der -the` "O'leswet4otion of the astite � �t+rladebti+ai +�iane�tel Pieitr L�►t Deesigttatian. f At :the Hatch. 10.11Ile$ Planhf'n9 C60misalon Stuar Session;' staff p Am llriae18;. rri ►'iM -,4! ,the Draft Allis-Gpldenwast Specific Plan. fr : r , 1 twltft` ifia►t �►AoA sad dlieuessia , bar 9'isnting ` ansSBinec gprseiiei�n voted . 7 to 0,' to Oat' Zone And -2nY1r6tsmental t IaapaCt r�' e io�r i .fie . . - b'�io heacn oe• itNrcri ' f1,��' 1�8q. lx��u�led in th o art 46, 04 draft ardiaance for roue Chao a go . t9►-10 Cade nibMa. : �p.4 and the , 2111a-Go!demos't Specific Plane 'which wii1 bo .forwtrded, to the 'Cit* Council for 4doption ,Nth W Ica] i f ray ter. Pleutle Ca rr�rioa rt S ► + _..�► T e a the ea 'r iasuas that are addressed I'm the xevisI! by l t e-Ooldemest spiel f is plan. - : Stiff ROPO t - 3/21/89 r�w (zaZ1d). r }r l x 71' .N i w ' adequate vehicle stacking, sufficient turnaround) area, and separate temw�rary Parking area while using the intercom system. in addition, review and approval by Public forks , mire and Community Development Departments is required. in summuar , staff recommends the proposed continuous circulation, ' layout based op efficient planning of utilities , efficient mo,ze'mant of vehicles within the qusrtersection snd ra4oiction of access mists a - along the arterials . The proposed Specific Plan contains a section on an overall ! community them which includes designated open space corridors, landim'..aping treatment, common fencing, equestrial, trails, gtading . limitations ,and the requirement of a master homeowner's- association mn to ensure that 'ail coin areas are maintained consistantly. ; j The Specific Plan contains a provision to require a ' twenty--five' '(251),. . . fodt Pori Motor setback .area along all ai:teriala (Goldenwest. ftr'sot, Ellis • Avesue, -Qartiold ' Avenue and Zdwards Street) which will incltlae landscaping ,ond an eight ($) .foot pride equestrian trail. The natant',* of the peri"ter setback area is to provide more open space ; alonj•' the four (a) , arterials and enhance the street scene. The landscape.:: treatment and meandeillelg equestrian.., trail gill provide interest well an function. The perimeter. setback area will provide increased ' '. i sound attenuation for homes with backyards that abut .the arterials.; As part of the comity them . the perimeter ,setback landscape aroko the.,interior trails . and open space corridors will enhance the residential environment. The,. residents who reside in the a:istind`' ; residential subdivisions indicated to staff that they apprecista , tt�er, Open -space +amnitios. it should be noted that all common areas (landidapi • trail, open space' corridor) wi11 be maintsiW4 by, homeowner 0asociations amd not the City. A master homeowner .,s associatio4 or similar, sm boulan will be created to ensure ; consistent implementation and maintenance of the common areas . ' ,Also, as a follow-up docu' DOnt, staff will prepare a DesigA Wideliuos booklet which will not forth further details of arcbitec•tural provisions, fencing, landscape and conmunity theme provisions . This booklet will be reviewed by the Subcommittee and . _eubmAttaid to the Planning Commissin for final approval. Section 4 , Development standards, of the proposed Specific Plan �;ontains ' s number of development standards which will implement the Ustate Residential land use designation. The following is a general summary of the development standards: ( �a� arc act sire 11 ton(110.) ac�r- .. ` S t'_ %-n errT N sea S�a Irk e. 1 d�K.GYt pT7 Aon Staff Report - 3/21/09 905� T22221d) ;1 10 ,t ",011z •4 . �.,.. ' .� a , f1 y .'.lh', r __... ` ... M1--.— �.-----.—��A M„ r J y �Ia f 44 +� ,�'��A q1, ,,,•,��,y,�y"'M �,, ,1� ;ram' ,Ar i F. h A A Ivor 10 • fir' - '„ ..+1� � � -�'�' L.ii'�.b.R. �»..` J .� ,`' �' � �,..�' lam' ��✓ j'y{..�' ,�`�'�"t,� �•L." {e,{... ' { 04.0 �"' • , r .0t ...... . , �i��-�t��• � wt,.�+� �,r��, 1, ' r r �2•� �t�...� der. ,__:.�'d- �� �'�'"---. •i it now '01 Mc j +- -go - Z 4, Ilk . �. ,r, _ .✓+-fir- �-� d A ' �., ; _ 1 ....� r 1 l�-t���� - ,mac- r' •� - _ _ fir" • . �� c:.., . . . . �._ �.�:� ./.�„ I 1 �el f"' •em�uu}} ',J~ rI h,5 I OWN, -Yr '(S.•aw. AMC .- >.: ,�.i,144•,^:1' .. , FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Dab June 19 , 1989 . Honorable mayor and City Council Members 4 .-r x � �; Paul . Cook, -City Aftinistrator F `.;� 14D �I, Pr Michael Adoms, Director of Comunity Develop C2 t LAO a�+ 24M0 CFAMM ■D. 89-1/CDDM Mirr NO. 89--1: CURI&TI"TION 0t =l8_CialM"MBT SPECIFIC Colabbol with CourWi Poi ? 1 IV! yN ] MW PO or Ex imn C 1 MMnr of heim tWwnrrraxlat m, Ans", Funding %ures,Alte"flw Acidom, Ahsahnaftz LOW A susaary of the City Council action and a cla=ification of one issue in the Ellis-Goldenwent Specific Plan ea directed by the City Council on June 51 3989 is presented. Specifically, rear building setbacks for 12, 000 square foot lots is discussed. t Staff recommends that the City Council review the clarification and adopt ordinance No. 2995 (Second heading) an prepared by the City Attorney (Second introduction approved on June 5, 1989) . do `June 50 19590 the City Council approved the. E11is-Go2detwest 5pe01f3c 'Plsn with minor revisions which included a *eduction .of the Chs"' An ftuostiian trail from 25 feet to 16 feet (see .page 17 of revised exhibit A) and increasing the average roof height of , main tttui ctures from 25 feet to 30 feet (maximum 35 feet height to highest ridgeline, seepage 21 exhibit A) . The City Council al4o directe4 staff to clarify the impact of requiring a 50 foot rear builain- setback in lieu of 15 feet for lots 12,000 square foot or greatex in sloe. , The intent Oe the 50 foot rear building setback is to p;ovide. greater diiign ' variation in the large estate lots (15, 000 square feat or greater) . with regard to stabling a horse, on-site, the Specific. Plan requiren ,a minimum 50 foot buffer setback for equine structures from a habitable structure on an adjacent lot . Staff faerls that a 50 foot rear building setback would create din undue hardihi,p on, lots smaller than 15 ,000 square feet. The equine structure buffer setback will better monitor on-site stabling of horses for lots 12 ,000 square feet or greater. '�� i.,YID, j�•�J . J ' . ? . '.r � 'P d�,y,", r' M� Ff Puy • bp'r I r 'V gar v.•' iJ ^.� J.. •. `/ !.y l r . (' ,�,��� •w, .:;, ', ,i.r'.r r rl. ,.i Jr,t'',' i,. 4'• Stuff racomcsends a 50 foot rear building setback for lots 15,000 k: square feet or greater as required in the E11is-Goldenwost Specific i X111 NO* d6-2 was certified by the City Council on May 1, 19119. Mt. fus-tlor action is necessary. Not applicable. ALMON: The .City Council May modify the Ellisy-Goldenwest Specific Plan so E` desired. 1� Ordinance No. 2098. { 2. Revised Eahi.bit 'A: Ellis-Goldenvost Specific plan dated June 19, 1989 . I R• 1 , ! • 1 I { RCA 6f19/89 -Z= (2929d) .17 fi' •f i .. ��� � � � � �',;�'� 1 _,ter � M h{�� i•.� �.,+r��� ,�y �:1��' .{ ,.Y4` ',rl ' r r x RL1rMD EXMIT A DRAFT ELLIS - G iLDENWEST SPECIFIC PLAN s' City of Huntington Beach Department of Communi{ty Development Planning Division Jung 15, 1989 ,; I }+iK AMN p ' y r ts'1•L'ti1Y,f ' j%':,1jr`S•.Yt,"d' 'L ' .` w•\ qp ' 4' TABLE OF CONTENTS AIJ D OBJECTMES 2 ". PROJECT AREA DESCRIPTION 2 II. APpuc nom PROMDURES gNTITLE NTS $ S. SPECIAL PERMITS 9 III. ( ERAL PRO'VLSMS A. PERMITTED USES 10 11: C1RCbLATION 11 C. COWA LAITY THEME 14 D. GRADING 19 E. ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS 19 1. HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION 19 IV. ESTATE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. PROJECT AREA 21 B. MAXiMUM DENSITY 21 C. ESTATE RESIDENTIAL SUBDRgSION 21 D. ARCHITECTURAL. FEATURES 22 E. RESIDENTIAL EQUESTRIAN FACILITIES 23 P. OIL ACTIVITIES 26 G. CIVIC bISTRICT 26 H, MISCELLANEOUS 26 V. APPMICES A. DEWI! LOPMENT STANDARDS FOR EXISTING SUBDIVISIONS 29 B, DESIGN GUIDELINES 31 1 I 'G IL ' Ilk �,rr 1tir t,l' rR 1 !c IJ' �.� 1 4 IJ A 1' , 1�. � .,.,• a.1 ' y1 �a � ,,,;1 �N'1,7;�' � r x 1 u ['y 1_ Y Wrri lr f, f, '� �l•� � I1J� l ����� ''1'1 i..� '1 1� � ^ � r/4� :"Y r»txr:c 4r 4 1.� �� cYF� •k 1 r 1 old WWWMMVXWFI r'1' / ! ,XyC, ;ter a . LIST OF EXHIBITS N: �A 1• 1 r 1n.1 1 3 .4adfle Plaa Area 4 S G+ene W Plan Deeignt':on . • • . . 6 4. tb* Zoning 7 . . . s► Arts%1 and Collector street Profiles . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 b. Intlrrs*1a1letar Street Circulation • • . . . . . . . . . . • r . . 13 7: Private Street and'interiar Trail Easement Profiles . . . . . . . 15 $• tin Space Corridors and Trail System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 1 L t. i �i���Y�'• •sly, i, e . •�! MOM , r. ! YNODUCTiON A. PURPOSE Tbo 1114*0 ►idenvest Specific Plan area has.been the subject of sPecial planning for a amber of reasons. First, It is the largest area in the City dertijn,ted for ate,R ntial development and as such requires Eptclal implementing ot+dl�p►a "a,' sad.n the area is close to ,significant open space and recreation areas'Including kiintington Central Park to the north and the Bolsa Ghica l wlan*'and ed Dols& Chica Linear Regional Park to the west. .This location, in combination with,the area's natural topography, creates unique opportunities for views, open space and recreation areas to be incorporated into a development proposals. Third, the area is a focal point for equestrian activities in the City and, with proper planning, can continue to accommodate this use. Thn area contains oil resources and continued access to this resource is an important concern. , Last, there are a number of constraints in the area such as existing single family residential subdivisions, the lack of public works fac!1ities, and the diversity of property owners and parcel sizes, which if not addressed thr+ h the planning process could result in piecemeal, uncoordinated developments. The,purpose.of this Specific Plan is to implement the Estate Residential general plan land use:designation and to coordinate all development in,the Ellis-Goldenwest quartersectlon by way of a comprehensive strategy tallored to the unique charAoteriatics of the site. The Spacific. Plan will permit estate residential (singh farnily detached residences) on large lots with sensitivity towards the existing topography and provide equestrian amenities wf thln the quartersection. Merry properties,in;the' Specific plan area t%rrehtly,have an RA, Residential l Atricultvail, zoning which allows only one dwelling unit per acre. Existing estate residential subdivisions have a qualified-low den$ity residential zoning classitkition which irequ;res equestrian amenities within 'assoclate'd subdivisions and estate Wdentlal development standards. Where are three Arens in the Specific Plid awea which'have been subdivided Into small lots.(samatimes called encyclopedia lots). These sma11 lots have an LU, Limited Urse,zoning designation. Limited'Use zoning restric* Wuse of the property to far`Mt ng, grazing, trails, orchards, greenhouses, picnic grounds and other similar uses; resldent1sl uses are not permitted. The Limited Use coning also;has a minimum . 10 acre pt+jwt area requirement prior,to the establishment of any of the, permittod,utse. Another property in*the Specific Plan area has au Ml,' Light Manufactwing, zoning which is: not consistent` with the City's General Plan. Development on this property can not be approved until this-zoning is brought Into conformance with the General Plan or until the General Plan is amended. l ((IS2SD) 1 , i .ter• I '3. OJALS' AND OBJEC :JF:S Upon adoption, the Specific Plan will be the zoning for the ontire quartersection. t will ;'ow properties currently zoned RA to develop at a higher density tha�. ..�.,n•�r.d ,'lowed. It will allow the properties currently zoned MI and LiJ to residential in a manner which is consistent with tha General Plan land Zi., •� .%Aalion of Estate Residential. The general location of the Specific f l .,.: :- 'ea is depicted in Exhibit 1. The following goals and objectives for this Sper.lfic !'Ian incorporate policies from the General Pl n. 1. To encourage and maintain a well-balanced varlet,, of residential densities and uncrowded living environments by encour•ap,;ng rational use of the land and other natural resources. 2. Allow for Estate Residential with equestrian amenities. 3. Provide adequate internal circulation and minimize direct access off of adjacent arterials. 4. Encourage an internal circulation system that conforms to the site's natural topography and provides view opportunities where passible. 5. Encourage coordinated design of development and improvLilhents 'i.e. curvilinear streets, fencing, landscaping) to enhance visual appearance. 6. Preserve significant tupographical features and minimize alteration of natural terrain. ?- Provide for continued equestrian uses. 8. Crease' a zoning classification of a sprc'if ic plan for this unique area. C. PROJECT TEA DESCRIPTION 1. ftindM *- The Ellis-Galdenwest Specific Plan encompasses the area rc aerally bounded by Ellis Avenue to the north, Edwards Avenue to the -...est, Garfield Avenue to the south and Goldenwe:st Street to the east as depicted In Exhibit 2. 2. SUSSl rasterlatics ' The Ellis--Goldenwest Specific Plan Includes '160 acres of-primarily undeveloped land. It Is charar.terized by gently rolling topog"r'ephy with two pronounced ravines which traverse the central and eastern portions of the area. The two ravines coller.t storm,water runoff and convey it into Huntington and Sully Abler Lakes. Significant oil reserves underlie much of the area. 2 (0B25D), .r.d. � sty o� WARNER AVE SLATER AVE N TALOCAT AVE EWS AVE ti J X'n QARFELD AVE i Project C site z I ADAMS AVE Vicinity Map Exhibit 1 (0779a) CILIS AVENUE : ELLIS-GOLDENWE ST SPEGFIC PLAN * `11 allow an overall density of 3 unitu per acre. GARFELD AVENUE Sper;1f1c plan Area Exhibit 2 4 (0779D) i 3. General Plan — The City's General Plan designates the northern portion of the specific plan area for estate rc..idential development at three dwelling units per gross acre.. The southern portion of the area is designated as estate residential at four dwelling units per gross acre. (See Exhibit 3). Because of its natural features and resources, the Specific Plan area Incorporates planned open space corridors which is consistent with the goals and policies of Open Space and Conservation Element of the General Plan. The open space allows for residential developments which maximize the area's open space benefits by incorporating open space into development p'ai ,. 4. Egial g_Z&n ng — Existing zoning within the area consists cl, a mixture of RA, Residential Agricultural (108 acres); Q—RI, Low Density Residential (30 acres); MI, Light Industrial (2 acres); and LU, Limited Use (20 acres). All of the study area has oil production suffix zoning which allows servicing of producing wells and reactivation of idle wells. All properties with frontage con Ellis Avenue or Goldenwest Street also have the — CD, Civic District suffix which requires any development on these parcels to be reviewed by the City's Design Review Board. (See Exhibit 4) 5. Existing LA13dise Wttl>; respect to land use, the majority of the study area is utilized fo, oil and natural gay production and appears vacant excopt for scattered oil wells, storage tanks, pipelines, and service roads. Approximately 30 acres are presently developed or approved for single 'family residential developments. Between Edwards and Goldenwest Streets, one temporary commercial horse stable occupies ;approximately 5 acres and a commercial nursery occupies 36 acres. G. Ealsting Circulation — Arterial access to the Specific Plan area is currently provided by Ellis and Garfield Avenues and by Edwards and Goldenwest Streets. Internal circulation within the area is limited and consists of segments of improved streets within existing subdivisions and a network of private dirt roads that connect oil wells. The lack of adequate internal access in the study area is a result of lard having been subdivided without dedication of right—of—way for access and public streets. The provision of a coordinated system of circulation is a major planning concern in preparing an overall development strategy for the Specific Plan area. ' 5 (0$25D) (CI6LL�) 9 f =jgttjx3 suo43eu84saa and teaauao 3 M13AV 013AND .�L::;:�•''i}}��y{{�,�•��i:%:'�:��• ':•:�::i•:�ti':':1:.:.i•:i'r�i i•�'t:�%;iti�1:•�r.•:•S•�i:;��';'�:�?:•':;4�:�J:r�,.,+��i:•�'� •,r.•i{:r.•;�,;r•.�i'Ti;:'��:Y� i'ii ti fti��l:•:••�iR•'•%'�:%1'::•�:':'i:''i{;�'�y�•::•�::':"�:1.;�r•ti''tQ�{4�{.!J:•�;rri .,4.,1.���'.•.!y�i'••fy1.•.�1!',;,ti ::i4��;:i :•:57�i.''•'�i�i':•:�•:•r•i•:'�i•�tii:'ri:�:':•::i•.�,:''�''�ti'���irw'::'%' ''•'%�;'J':�•J y�:•i:•:•:•:'i i'J•':•%;'%;:':;�;:,�;��j:�.•:}�•%.;.:1:i%'yr:�":•:�:� ':�:: .�'•i: i•�%•��%•�•��f� X ,.,r..44r•.�•�•,r'::i i rY:::•.:.•;•. • •;;.; ..•tir4i 1`r•;•:�.�• ,i i•;.;•i: � ••� �: •:.; tiV� S�:•ff,•��:•tiy i�r;•�:•`•Y, i'�•�•y,ri•'•�.i i•ice:i i i�r:ra•J ':•:�::• .•ii;:i;:•y i•.i '. r' .••h•; L. i:':'i;';.;•:•':���.:•�•:��;:i�yy:�■'�'�'�••hi r'�i;},.;.;��j,•,•:•:':•1::i•:�•:;:;::�%4y�;.;��•;rtiiJ;i,J':�;• �i l:�r•T� • •i::::•:'.•:i;:•:�::�':•i 'r'ititi'i!tiff:i;:;:r;i i i ;:'��-i�i;i:'i;'i!:•:i•:'i�'��•i�aa:'1•ti:i':•�i�t'. •:•:•:i i•�i;:•:i�f:;.;.;.`•;�.`;�•'�i'•:•.i':i:::i%:�:•:�.Y;•:Y:•:•.:�.��.';.�;.;.'i r;i::•��•:�::•:•tir•.;,�'i.;,tip�:�.�.:', •r:;:.•r'r•�;•�,r�•'•�r�•�f�.;r*rf;{i••;•;•;.;•;.;,�;�;.L,•:%:�:%:::i ii:':r�i•ri�•'i i i::�.i:-.:'•y.;••::'';•i:;'••:•:i:•:i -•:i�:�• 'i i i;:}•.4i;:�.%':�::'a;:ti� •�•��rr;.�.•:�y:;: i•:•:•••:'': r;;;i:;:':•�•i:••. �'i.'.' �.. UJ r.ii'�is..�r*::y;i•:•.":i''::'::::.:i.� :•:::,;•:'ri':,;.... •?:•d.•: +;,•:'.i':r+ .i■i•y:.i': :�i•i i%�':':'�.'i�:•:':•:•:•:'i�'::•!:•:•:::�'i:i•hi:�ti:�:•:i•:•::'i i:.i�;i i:'i��'r'i:'.'f V:•:r•��•'�':i'�1��'�•:•• :i::i�i':i' a:�':i::•�:•;r;i:•i%':�i•':i• :; :;i::��:•i:'i i ::'�:':':�:'��:":•:'i%i`.•:i•1J:;.;.;J•�•�i'!'•.�:�d�y�f;.�.� ;•:':•:•:•i:SS•:i•'i i,,�:;•;:�':�'�•'�:•:4':•:•.•.•:::�:;';%:%:��'�;•;•;•;'i•'•;•;r,'•;:•:ii'�%:%�:•:Y:i:i�;i t•�,:�.•.:'-err}•'•��i'�e ':�:•:':'•i�•i'':%'�':••:•:•:•.:•.i'.•itii i:•':•;:�':•::'�'•'�'r%•'•'i',•,•%•:'••::':,ti;.;.;.;+;irr�;•�r;r'•��,��ti:�'•�VYg1•ij;i�%'.i:'�i •�:•:i':ri•:;: ':f ;:;,;i r�i1e:'i:'�':';��L�i::•:�ii'i i:;i i r:':':•:':':;i•;�;%;,•••••�%��:�;'•�•�•.'Sii�•'J'•�•�•�•j?.ti�. (� •i;i•'i:;i i:;a::':':::•::i'i i:'i:;�:;�;:':'::•:':•�::':•��':':•%ii;:;i:':':'��::•:••'• �; ':�,�:'•�rL•!�'�'�i:Y4�;. sr •4ri�i'i:'i:'i a.i i•�'i:i'�:•;y:i�i�i i::•f;:��i ti:�''e;:i; :;:•:�;:�:�::•:•:•}•.y' ..:•�.•, , � "�:+••i :•i:y,;+;;;;•i;•�;�:;:;:;:;i ;: ',i i i i i:i':i':':'� �'••�'�'•i:i• . '. ,::�'r'�••:• • ••:••;•:• :+rrr'•�•:•�; ;�i:•;••i,i;•:';•;i�i;i,,,�:;�:•;•;•;•;•:i�•�'�:r�i i i��::;.�:;:;ti.;.b'.i.•:'•;•h%.+i•'•••f • •tiy• ::•. f y'�• '.'P:i .�i•y:.•.:•;.•• •••• r•;;i r.'r�••i4�,•:•::%:'i ii:;:• '•:':•:•:•.•.r':•.•�• :'i i•. •�.ram•_.i (ov/no ) ;.•r;i:i:;Yll•:��''+''�.'�i'`.•Y�,•;�d.�.�.r'i�i,'•.•:::Yi i i% '• .. • r4�yr'�4iV:'f"�i 1VilN3aS38 31V1S3 �• CA .,.,f.;:�:�:: '........:.:.........:....•:::::•'. '...•.:•::: ..•.•:....;• • .a.�,;::... (obrna E) IVIIN31CIS38 31d1SJ r A I i Va { t Y(PREZONED) M-0-cD 4CD OCD ' ��•�:, .�t;�y��� d�•T1 R"n o-ca 'RA-0 „ r y RA-( fig- 4. • 1 -.� A� i{ Y y�� sE,p C�i i fw � •'Y• ���(�75y Proiject 71al'i RA ■te " �•f1 `. * .II•..� � •'jl ! r t �£'tr £ �'s ii�� ''i f>i ',� y' 3,? ' _ I,��, rT�r� �• i i.'. i'�' '�R'< :i }CA FYarji .�' Y .• 'S RA•0•C aR jiw 4M V 1�-c� 1. � � Y. •1•i• I A OI CD / � ( � � ; ..''y,v, £r IAA•CO •• • s f q' I i ,eZ.S :,� �` .} : � T.i .�'�1S"tf �'•,� A�I+a L — 1111 .v _ �'�' 'lilrn�'1�'ri►i S �`�•���IIM l� �.,..w ,.� R4-0 Ir CI-0 -- M'2-01 RA-01 •cc ;z I.: Existing Zoning Exhibit 4 7 (08250) I r f II. APPLICATION PROCEDURES A. ENTITLEMENTS 1, All requests for development within the Specific Plan area shall require the approval of a Conditional tJse Permit and Tentative Tract Map pursuant to the provisiops of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. The Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Tract Map applications shall be submitted Concurrently :o the Department of Community Development. In addition to the standard submittal requirements, applications for CUP'S shall also include site plans, floor plans, elevations and cross-section profiles for each lot. Tentative Tract Map applications shall include all existing trees within the proposed subdivision and a rough grading plan shall be submitted for the entire subdivision depicting existing and proposed grade elevations. Lot sale programs shall provide conceptual site plans depicting building pad locations, cross-sections of each lot and private open space areas, Z. The Subdivision Committee shell snake recommendations on such projects to the Planning Commission for approval, conditional approval, or denial. prior to project approval the Planning Commission or the City Council stall also consider the following: a. Projects Shall be in conformance with the Specific Plan and the aeupted Design Guidelines for the area. b. Architectural features and general appearance of the proposed development steal: enhance the orderly and harmonious development of the area or the community as a whole. C. Architectural features shall be incorporated into the design of all exterior surfaces of the buildings in order to create an aesthetically pleasing project. d. Front and rear setback should be varied in order to provide break in bulk and interesting street scenes. 3. Amendments or revisions to a Conditional Use Permit (master plan oC development; previously approved by the Planning Commission may be approved by the Commission pursuant to a Site Plan Amendment with public hearing. . Prior to approval of the Site Plan Amendment, the fallowing findings must be met: a. the revision shall not constitute a substantial change. b, The use of property shall remain the same. C. If residential, the dwelling unit density shall remain the same. d. The revision shall result in an improved development. a. The revision shall comply witl, all applicable provisions of the Ellis~-Goldenwest Specific plan and Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 6 (0625D) 4`b A SPECIAL PERMITS 1. An application for a special permit requesting deviation from the provisions of this Specific plan may be filed with the Department of Community Development, and such application shall be heard concurrently with the Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Tract Map applications. Deviation from the development standards up to 10 percent may be granted at the time of approval of the project by special permit. Special permits shall not be granted for exceeding maximum density or minimum project area. The Planning Commission may approve the special permit application in whole or in part upon a finding that the proposed deviation will: a. Promote better living environment; b. Provide better land planning techniques with maximum •use of landscaping, site layout and design; C. Not be detrimental to the general health, welfare, safety and convenience of the neighborhood or City In general, nor detrimental or injurious to the value of property or improvements of the neighborhood or of the City in general; d. Be consistent with obje;:tives of the Estate Residential development standards in achieving a project adapted to the terrain and compatible with the surrounding environment; and e. Comply with state and/or federal law. 9 (0825D) � 1 nt. GENERAL PROVISIONS The Ellis—roldenwest Specific Plan shall be subject to the definitions contained in the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. The following general provisions shall apply to al: development projects: A. PERMITTED USES I. The following uses are permitted subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit (and Tentative Tract Map for subdivisions) by the Planning Commission: a. Residential (1) Single family detached dwellings, one unit per lot. (mintmurr, 8,000 not foot lot size; minimum 15,000 net square feet for 20% of the lots) (2) Land subdivisions intenJed for lot sale programs. b. QpCo 5nace Recreation (1) Private recreation area for the exclusive use by members of � homeowners association group. (2) private recreation area or uses for exclusive use of ho7ieowner(s). (3) Commercial equestrian facilities subject to the commercial equestrian facility development standards contained in the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. (a) A three to five acre neighborhood park within the quartersection which may Include equestrian orientation. c. Cenerai (1) public School 2. The following uses are permitted subject to the approval of a Use Permit by the Zoning Administrator: a. 0*4.1te. equestrian facilities in conjunction with single family dwellings (requires minimum 12,000 net square foot lot size). b. New oil wells and oil consolidation projects shall be permitted subject to applicable provisions of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code and Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 3. The following uses are permitted; e. Continued operation, reworking and/or drilling of oil wells active at the time of adoption of this Specific Plan shall be permitted subject to applicable City Regulations. 10 (0825D) I b. Accessory buildings such as private garages in conjunction with single family residential dwellings. I C. Open Spa-,e corridors. I B. CIRCULATION 1. &f,erlaa Streets. Direct access of residential streets and private driveways to arterials shall be limited and subject ti the approval of the Departments of Public Works and Community Development. a. $igbts—of—we right—of—way for A�.e�J�. Additional ig —of—wa Y dedication may be required at the time of project development. Trails along arterials will serve to link proposed the Eolsa Chica Linear Regional Park and Huntington Central Park trails and will be incorporated into the Orange County Master Plan of Hiking and Riding Trails. Garfield Avenue and Coldenwest Street public rights—of—way shall be dedicated and developed in conformance with the City's street design standards subject to the approval of the Departments of Community Development and Public Works. Future improvements or realignments to Edwards Street and Ellis Avenue public rights—of—way shall be offered to the City for dedication. b. &tbarzks from Arter-lills. A landscaped area shall be provided adjacent to arterials (Garfield, Ellis, Coldenwest and Edwards) subject to review and approval of the Departments of Community Development and Public Works. The arterial landscape easement shall be a minimum twenty-five (25) feet in width and shall contain a minimum eight (8) foot wide equestrian trail (see Exhibit 5). BuMing setbacks shall be taken from the interior landscape easement line. The landscape easement area shall be privately maintained. c. lgtn ramAccess. Temporary access may be taken directly off an arterial provided that: (1) the temporary access is approved by the Departments of Public Works and Community Development, and (2) the developer posts a bond with the City before recordation of a final map .,uff icient to cover the,costs of removing the temporary access. The Department of Public Works will determine the amount of the bond to be posted. Conversion to the approved pe.manent access point is required upon completion of the necessary local collector streets and/or arterials to planned ultimate alignments. 2. Collertor Streets. Internal collector streets shall be constructed in conformance with'the conceptual alignment shown on Exhibit 6. Said streets shall be developed in accordance with the require i aents of the Department of Public %arks. a. Accrjs to 1nt!!=J Collr,Gtors. Direct access of private driveways to internal collector streets shall be limited and shall require the oppl�av�►l of the Departments of Public Works and Community Development. . l b. cmthmekifrom Internal Ck Streets. A landscape/equestrian trail setback easement area shall be provided adjacent to all internal collector stye-its as depicthd in Exhibit S. l l (0875D) {Y, Parkway Trail i 8 $� 12 25 r 25- Arterial Street Profile eo- Trail Trail Loe 14 8 3 3 s .4 10 t6 42 15 Collector Street Proffig Arterial and Collector Street profile Exhibit 5 12 (082SD) ELLIS AVENUE —J L U W cc a J C.J � z t� (� t3AHFiELD AVENUE ACCESS POINTS + Internal Collector Street Circuietion Exhibit 6 13 (0779D) k snub I � 1 The setback easement area shall be privately owned and maintained. All fencing within the landscaped setback area shall conform to the fencing provisions of this Specific Plan and Design Guidelines. C. R101s gF= a3• fgr ZnYgrnaICollector Stream The internal collector streets shall include an area which can serve as a trail link for development projects which do not have direct access to the public Open Space Coreldor and can also serve as an emergency parking area. d, latt rlm Barrier: An intersm barrier sha11 be placed at the location depicted in Exhibit 6 subject to the requirements of the Police, Fire, Public Works and Community Development Departments. At such time as the internal collector street is fully improved, a determination to retain toe barrier shall be made. All property owners within the 160 acre quarter section shall be notified in a timely manner prior to a public hearing before the Planning Commission. 3. Privat.e Streets. Rcsidenti,al streets shall be privately owned and maintained. Said streets shall be improved In accordance with the conceptual design standards for residential streets depicted in Exhibit 7. All streets shall be curvilinear if feasible, and shall contain a five (5) foot wide, pedestrian easement adjacent to the curb. 4. CEnerg1. Recreational circulation shall conform to the Orange County Master Plan for bikeways/traii,;. C. COMMUNITY THEME Open Space Corridors shall be established as depicted in Exhibit B. Development within Open Space Corridors shall be limited to recreational trails with appropriate fencing and public works facilities and utilities. The open space corridors have been designated as primary components of the overall drainage ,system in the quartersection. The Open Space Corridors shall follow to the greatest extent feasible the alignment of the existing natural drainage swales which traverse the area. The Open Space,Corridors shall be held as common open space by homeowner associations. The open space corridors shall generally be delineated by those areas below the fifty (50) foot contour. The precise dimensions and location of the Open Space Corridor shall be subject to review and approval of the Departments of Community Development and Public Works.The corridor shall include a minimum easement dedication of sixteen (16) feet for a public equestrian/ recreational trail. The equestrian/ recreational trail shall be setback it minimum of twenty (20) feet from any habitable floor area. 14 (08x5O) i Pedestrian 15.asemeni Pedestrian Easement 5 5' r-- 42 Private Street Profile OIL ry 4• $ 4, 25 25 Intern`%,U �'ra l 1�reflle Private Street aM.-Interior 'Trail Pmpf]iles Exh\.%w t 7 15 (0$ZSp) i I 2• .L-S�IIIIIt�Il_�4t��'.�"1 Common open slrace and private streets shall be ny a restrictive, covenant running with the land descrih. if, the open space and irts maintenance and improvement for the 1,,enefit of residents of the development. Prior to recort.-fation the de eiconer shall file with ttte Department of Cornrnunity Developni nt, with the final subdivision map, all legal documents which will provide for restricting the use of common spaces for ;e designated purpose, as approved cin the final develc-pntent The City may also require th<<t tine homeowner's association relinquish all d valopmenr rights in common areas to the City. All common improvements Including but not limited to trai1q. project fencing and common open space landscaping shall be completed by the developer prior to the sale of any lots and/or unite. All lands to be conveyed to the homeowner's asso4iation and/or the City shall be subject to the right of the grantee er r_;-antees to enforce maintenance and improvements of the common ,.pace and public trails easement. 3. tldi.C,1p1ng-- Landscaping shall meet the following requirernents: Landscaping shall be In cooformance with the adopted Design Guidelines for the area. a. All setback areas frontin; on or visible frorn - street shall be landscap(M and permanently maintained in an attractive manner. Such landscaping shalt consist primarily of ground cover, trees, shrubs, and other living; plants. Plant materials shall be drought resistant. b. Decorative design elements such as fountains, pools, benches, sculpture, planters and similar elements may be permitted provided such elements are incorporated as a part of the landscaping plan. C. Permanent automatic irrigation facilities s11all be. provided in all landscaped areas. d. tin-site trees shall be provided as follows: one (1) thirty-six (36) inch box tree for each residential unit or the equivalent of thirty-six (36) Inch box trees as provided herein. Severity-five (75) percent of the total requirement shall be thirty-six (36) inch box trees and the remaining 25 percent of such requirement may be provided at a ratio of one (1) inch for one (1) inch through the use of twenty-four (24) Inch box trees. Additional trees and shrubs shall also be planted to provide a well-balanced landscaped development. e. A distinctive landscape area shall be provided at the corner; of arterials for enhanced landscape treatment subject to the requirements of the Design Guidelines. The area shali be ;greater than the general 25 foot perimeter setback and the perimeter fence stall have a 45 degree arrgle at the corner. 16 (0$25D) 1 4. _c'11 Fencer, and walls ,hall be in conformance with the adopted Design GL1W aline:; for the area. a. Fences, hedges and berms shall not exceed three, and one-half (3--1f2) feet in height may he located In the front yard setback: area provided that the fence is a wood picket, wood rail, wrought--iron or other similar type. Fencing is not permitted w1:11in five (5) feet from back of curb. b. jdutr _YZearyaf m-vu. The use of solid fencing ins~luf'in(; wood, poured concrete, concrete block, brick fences not exceeding six (6) feet in height may be located on the required side or rear yard property lines. Wraug,-t troy, or other sirrlllar• type! of see:-through fencing may be used in conjunction with swimming pool areas, subject to review and approval by the Department of Community Development. c. rtt�:rsr �yi_ i�ii its. On corner lots, no fence, hedge, wall, sign, sr;!-ucture, mound of earth, landscaping, or other visual obstruction between forty-two (42) inches and seven (7) feet in height above the nearest street curb elevation, shalt be erected, placed, planted or allowed to grow within the triangular area formed by inersuring 25 feet from the intersection of the ►ront and exterior side property lines. Trees trimmed free of branches or foliage so as to maintain visual clearance below seven (7; .. et arc. exempt from the above prohibition. d. Rellgtit—M-1km tire rnenr of Fec-L or Wall. The height of a fence shall be as defined !n the I•Iuntington Beach Ordinance. Code. �. t�irLTralb, A mj.plm.l1rAid ch tu i ties 3ria on tr�Cil min—LWL..earHc .t.e-d-toA—he City—fir ut1"qiu-! r� Ia� stion Irall. All developments must provide trail access to the open space corridor or primary ey aestrianlrecreation trail subject to review and approval of the Department of Community Development arrd shall be in conformance wir.h Exhibit 8. Fquesti-Jan trails .shall be improves; in accordance with the following standards: a. Tread width shall be a minimum of eight (8) feet. Trail tread area shall be gi-aded sinooth, free of weeds, stumps, roots, debris and large rocks. Adequate ,drainage shall be provided when grading. b. The trail shall be wear of all obstructions from gruund level to a height of ten (10) feet. 17 (0$25D) 1 • i l I1 EiLLIS AVU-jUl- R A a q r P � � +� w ��.. . w r . .► � .r r .► FTI ®91r, r' i 0 4P / �u } r e �G / 0 O w � v n s .� . a .., r. • a � � w s .. � r R iw �. r. f. w .� N• � 1.. �1 I GARFIE:LD AVENUE Space ipr l5quouh-lan Trail Open Space Corridors and Trail System FxhiN t 8 18 (0825a) ti C. A)) tt Iall fencing shall be subject to the provisions contained in the Design Gvidolines. d. Interior equestrian trails shall conform to the profiles contained in Exhibit 7. D, GRADING Limited gradling may he allowed in Open Space Corridors for trails, access bridges or to enhance the open space character of the area subject to review anti approval by the Director of Community Development. A 1982 reference; topography contour map .:Ball be on file %with the Department of Community Development in order to establish topography prior to development and to resolve land use issues. Grad-Ing activities for development in other areas shall not involve more than a two foot cut and a two foot depth of fill fro►n existing topography as depicted in the 1982 topography contour map. Minor deviations may be permitted subject to the approva! of special hermit. Grading plans shall be subject to review and approval by the Departments of Community Development and Public Works. These provisions shall not apply to grading for roadways and drives nor for oil well cellars as required by the City's Oil rode. "JI structural designs shall fit the natural land forms to the ,greatest extent possible. Use of terraces and split level structures shall be encouraged where al.—propriate. E. ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS � Ret'er to '�;nvlronrnental Impact Report No. 88-2. 1 HOMFONVIVERS' ASSOCIATION All developments shni submit a lega" '�istrument(s) setting Forth a plan or manner of permanent care and maintenance of private sewers, pipes, facilities; drainage swales, recreational areas, communal facilities and private streets. No such Instrument shall lie acceptable until approved by the City Attorney as to legal form and effect, and by the Community Development Department as to suitability for the proposed use of th--- open areas. Dedication for public equestrian/recreational trails/easements shall be offered to the City and accepted by the City only afte► all improvements have been made. 1 . Common open spaces are to be conveyed to the Homeowners' association and the developer shall file declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions wh!ch will be submitted with the final tract map for approval, which w°li govern the Dissociation. The provisions shall include, but not be limited to, the following: a. The homeowners' association shall be established prior to the sale of the lAst dwelling unit. b. Membership shall be mandatory for each buyer and any successive buyer. C. The open space restrictions shall be permanent. (08250) j ' •1 't1 d. jr the development Is constructed In Increments or phases which require one or mare final mxps, reciprocal covemits, Conditions, and restrictions and reciprocal management and maintenance agreements small be establishers which will cause a merging of irc:rement. as they vre completpd, and eml)ody one homeowilers' :association with common iirvas for the total development. e. Membership shell he mandatory In the Alaste: Homeowners' Association or similar mechanism for maintenance of all common open spate areas. 2. Regular maintenance of the arterial lands-, ape and equestrian trail easement, collector struct .aiidscaping and equestrian trail and interior equestrian trails and other common areas shall be the responsibility or a Master Homeowners' Association or similar entity. 'rhe precise mechanism. for establishing a maintenance program for the entire qunrtersectiort shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney, Community Development Departnmit and Public Works Department. I f i 20 (082SO) 1 . I :ter. ..j IV. ESTATC RI.SY.DENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. I'W"WECT AREA The minimum project area for any development proposal shall be ten (10) gross acres. A project area may consist of non-contiguous parcels provided cacti subarea is a miifimum of five (5) gross acres. H. MA?iUMUM DENSITY The density of any project sl'iall be ? maximum of three (3) units per gross acre. C. ESTATE RESIDENTIAL SUDDIVISION I . Lot rqA. All lo•;s shall contain a minimum of 5,000 net square feet of area. 'Twenty percent (20%) of the lots within a subdivision shall be a minimum of 15,000 net square feet. Estate/equestrian lots (12,000 net square feet or greater) should be located adjacent to a designated equestrian trail. 2. 11'Width and FrQ 1Lage. The minimum lot frontage shall be seventy-two (72) feet except for cul-de-sac and knuckle lots which shall be forty-five ;45) feet. 3. SS3&_CQve�. The maxiintim site coverage suad be. thirty--five (35) percent of the net lot area for multi--story structures; forty-five (45) percent for single-story structures. 4. xim ui-�i j.g`ht. The maximurn building height for main structures shall not exceed thirty (30) feet (n� .xirntir�� 5 felt ;0 1 d.dg4]li ) or two stories as defined in the Huntington Beach Ordinance Cede. The maximum building height for accessory structures shall not exceed fifteen (15) feet. S. ,hK 9_M. d erngwj. All main structures shall comply with the following minimum setbacks, a. Front Yard. The minimum front yard setback shall be twenty-five (25) percent of lot depth provided ;urther that said frunt yard setback shall not be less than thirty (30) feet from bacl of curb and need not exceed forty (40) feet. Front yard setback shall be measured from back of curb. b. SidLIAd. The aggregate side yard setback on any lot shalt be a tmini'mum of twenty (20) feet; the minimum setback on any interior side shall not be less than five (5) feet, and on any exterior side not less than 10 feet. C. Rear. Yard, The minimum rear yard setback shall be twenty-five (25) feet; except lots exceeding 15,000 square feet shall be a minimum of 50 feet.. Rear yard setbacks for lots abutting arterials shall provide varied ream setbacks from twenty-five (25) to thirty (30) feet. Y d. Patio CQyerA. Patio covers may be constructed to within ten (10) feet of rear property line. 21 (0820) x 1 1 e. 1S��P1�€�f;ty�Lc;L1LIaZ:1lll. Ilt � .�truxti The rnininjurn distance between ihn.. main st:-ucture anti accessory structures shrill he ten (10) feet. 6. No accessory building shall be located within the. front half car the lot. 1 b. iisl The rnirirnum s,de yard for accessory buildings shall be five (5) feet. C. RtAy_YArd. The r► Wnium rear yard for accessory buildings shall be five (5) feet n xcept when adjacent to an equestrian trail where the setback shall he a ininimum of ten (10) feet. 7. 1PXIY219-0-cz911_S PMS,• a. Each lot shall provide behind the front setback lane a minimum usable open space area on the ground of twelve hundred (1200) square feet with no dimension less than 20 feet. I b. Private open space area s1!;all not exceed a ten (10) percent slope. � g. PArRing Reouirculen1j. All develu,7ments shall meet the minimum, I off-street parking standards of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. In addition to the parking provisions contained in the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, the following shall apply: a$ All dwelling units shall contain a minimum three (3) I*ully enclosed spaces plus three (3) open spaces which may be in tandem with the enclosed spac_,s. b. An additionai parking space shall be provided for each bedroom in excess of four (4) bedrooms which may be covered. °. �.�tions. Developments on lots within Final Tract Maps 11473, 11805, 11769, 11036, 13210, ,;hall be exempt from, this subsection, and subject to the requirements of their respective Conditional Use Permit (see Appendix A) and appropriate provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Core, I:1 zoning district. D. ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES The creation of an estate, equestrian theme and the maintenance of consistency In architectural character shall be addressed in the project design. In reviewing projects, the Planning Commission shall look for the following design features: 1. Street 1;yhts and street signs on collector and private residential streets and trail sigru shall be consistent throughout the Specific Plan area. 2. The use of natural building materials, textures and tones, such as rough wood siding and/or stonework shall be encouraged. 22 (082M) I t. .1 3. Hard surface areas (walks, driveways, pa; o,, etc.) shall be designed as an Integral part of that architecture. 4, R,x,f Appel should not be lez, than a 3 and 11. pitch. S. Roof flashing, rain clutters and downspri,its, and other roof protr-:sions are to be finished to ina tc h the adjacent ;materials and/ai• Colors. 6. Architectural screens other than fence's shall ippear to be an extensimi of the structure ante designed to create exterior p; ivnry. 7. Roof protrusiono suctr as roof—mounted air c-ondii•ioning units and solar collector panels, shall be located away from the c-ntrance street frontapm and screened from view of street rights-.of—wadi. S. Architectural planning site layout and structure design shall take full advantage of p.ssive energy efficiency features, such as natural heating and/or cooling, sun and wield exposure, and solar energy opportunities. 9. Accessary buildings shall br architecturally compatible in design and materials to the main residential dwelling unit. E. RESIDENTIAL EQUESTRIAN FACILITIES 4 I The intent of this section is to establish standards for the stabling of horses in a manner whf4h will nor cndangcer the health, peace, and safety of the rommunity and which will assure that horses are kept in a clean and sanitary condition. It is further the Intention of this article to privide for the reGular inspection of horse facilities to assure healthy stable nranagemer;t. i I. EQuine. a. No horse shall be kept, stabled or tethered on any parcel without prior approval of a Use Permit subject to the standards listed below. b, Mhimwm Loi SU&. No horse shall be kept, stabled or tethered an any parcel less than i'61,000 net square feet in area. C. Number gf Horses. The following number of horses may he kept on an Ind+vidual residential lot: of 5I7e (net) MA&. O, of li:,?irlear' 12,000 up to 14,999 sq.ft. 1 15,000 up to 19,999 sq.ft. 20,000 up to 29,999 sq.ft. 3 30,000 up to 39,000 sq.ft: 4 40,000 sq.ft. or greater 6 In addition, immature offspring up to 12 months c,ld may be kept on the lot. 23 (08ZSD) 1 a y, 1 J d. .Iha�b.,I3yl�ir' �'nSS .SItl ��tlsdGl►1�i' They setback requirements shall pertaln to all structures that relite to horses Including but not limited to stalls, corrals, arenas and fly-tight manure bins, except pastures or grazing areas. Setbacks may be reduced fat, equine structures and corral arek s subject to findings and approval of a Use Permit based upon proximity to trails and abutting residential uses. The following setback requirements for stables shall apply: (i) �ronA. The front yard setback shall be a iniiihnuin of fifty (50) feet. (7) 1JiwJQL21_de. The interior side yard setback shall be a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet; except minimum ten (10) feet when abutting an equestrian, open since or other similar easement. (3) L trElor Sidg. The exterior sine yard setback shall be a minimum of fifteen (15) feet. (d) R=. The rear yard setback shall be a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet; except minimum ten (10) feet when abutting an equestrian, open space or other similar easement. (5) I( CnICai. All paddocks and box stalls shall maintain a minimum distance of fifty (50) feet. from an), dwelling unit other than a unit on the subject property which is used for human habitation. � C. C=a];j. Each corral shall meet the following requirements: (1) The minimutn size paddock shall be 288 square feet with a minimum dimension of not less than twelve (12) feet and shall have a five (5) foot high fence. (2) Each horse shall be provided with a minimum of ninety-six (96) square feet of shelter covering with a minimum dimension of not less than eight (8) feet. Shelters shall be sloped sway from corrals, or rain gutters which lead to the outside of the corral shall be installed. r• (3) Each corral Shall be provide. with a combination manger and feeder and a permanently installed water system with automatic drinking controls. (4) Corral floors shall be graded to slope away from the center of the corral. (5) In all enclosures where horses are maintained, the land surface of such enclosure shall be graded above the remaining land surface so as to provide adequate drainage. r 24 (0825 )) awn% ti r 4 ..•« x, 'r SsA lions. Stallions shall be maintained in a mangier that will protect people and other animals. A bark-siphoning devise shall be installed to protect the public water supply subject to the approval cif the Department of Public: Works, Water Division. h, Ely p,tnd Fly and insect control shall be diligently practiced, I. enLf&Wr-Q1. Rodont -ontrol shall be diligently Practiced and the entire prendses shall be. kept in an orderly and sanitary manner to prevent possible rodent i,ifestatiun. The following guidelines and criteria shall be considered in reviewing plans: (1) All dry grains shall be stored in rodent proof metal containers and hay shall be stored in a covered structure on a cement siiab or on a raised wood platform that maintains a minhijum clearance of eighteen (18) inches above the ground. (2) Any tack equipment, device, substance, or material shall be stored on racks or shelves at lea.�t twelve (12) Inches above the floor surface. Tack room floors shall maintain a minitnum clearance of six (6) inches above the ground. j. Water Ma1agerrent. The following guidelines are provided: (1) An automata.: shut--off nonleak valve for all troughs, bowls, cups and other water sources shall he provided. (2) In paddock and corrals, the owner shall properly grade the earth surf•ac:e to conform to the master drainage plan so that rain water or water trough overflow does not form ponds. k• Q -C-viLiT'Szi. Continuous dust control of the entire premises steal' be maintained and subject to applicable provisions of the Huntington Beach Municipal Cede. 1. Stable Manaeement. The management of horse facilities shall meet the requirements of the Orange County Health Department to keep environmental problems at a minimum. m. Enforteratn1. The responsible county agency, as designated in the Huntington Beach Municipal Code, is hereby vested with the duty and authority to inspect regularly all horse stables within the city. Report and recommendation by such agency shall be forwarded to the Director of Community Development. 25 (0825D) x •� f 1 1 l=. OIL ACTIVI`CIES I. Continued operation, rewori;ing and/or redrilling of oil wells active at the time of adoption of' this Specific Plan shall be. permitted subject to applicable City regulations. a. Gasoline powered fmg;ines or) existing pumping units remaining in a development shall lie converted to electric motors prior :o occupancy of the first unit. b. The developer shall establish an interest-bearing account prior to recordation of the final snap to be administered by the homeowner association to cover the cost of landscaping well sites at the time they are abandoned. The amount of the Initial deposit shall be determined by the Director of Communhy Development. 2. New drilling and new storage tanks shall only be permitted in specified sites or "oil islands" as approved by Conditional Use Permit. The oil operator shall own or have a lease on subsurface mineral rights Covering an area of a minirnum of twenty (20) contiguous acres within the Specifics Plan boundaries for every one oil island requested. Before a permit for new drilling is issued, the oil operator shall specify the exact location and size of the proposed oil island (generally not to exceed two and one-half (2 1/2) acres in size) subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. a. Fencing around the perimeter of all oil islands shall be set back twenty (20) feet from any arterial highway or internal collector' street and fifteen (1 S) feet from any r, 1dential street, private property lure, or common open space area. The setback area shall be landscaped in accordance with the standards set forth in the City's Oil Code, G. C:IVIC DISTRICT � I The requirements of the civic district overlay steal; apply to all parcels located directly adjacent to the Huntington Central Park facility and shall comply with the provisions contained in the Huntington Beach Ordinance: Code. H. MISCELLANEOUS I . yehicy , g. The covered storage of boats, trailers, recreational vehicles or other similar vehicles Is allowed only within the rear half of an individual lot and is prohibited within any yard abutting a street right-of-way; no open storage is permitted. No comme►•cial oversize ' vehicle or special purpose machine shall be parked or stored in any portion of any yard area. Common areas for storage of boats, trai:er's, recreational vehicles and other similar vehicles may be provided for in the development plant. Where such areas are provided, they shall be enclosed and screened from view on a horizontal plane from adjacent areas by a combination of six (b) foot high masonry wall and permanently maintained landscaped area. 26 __. u 1 '1 2 E�& 4�I�r. l�di.tig��'_iit tur_ s1iL1 }tttilt� g. It shall Ire unlawful to construct, erect or locate accessory buildings on any lot: not having a perraf'issible residential building except i'nr commercial equestrian facilities. 3. I_l,at).og. The developer shall install am on-site lighting system on all vehicular access ways and along major walkways. Such lighting shall be directed onto driveways and walkways within the develop:itorct and away from adjacent propertivs. A. Sewer and water systems shall be designed to city standards and shall be loon ted wit►fin streets, easements or drives. in no ease shall individual sewer• lln,-3 or sewer mains fc:r a dwelling unit be permitted to extend underneath any other dwelling unit. S. FircJJYcmrU_%Xnf-m, A fire hydrant system shall be installed to provide an adequate fire flow. a. The fire hydrant system shall be dedicated to the City. Private fire hydrants are prohibited. b. The adequacy of such system shall be approved by the Fire Marshal. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to the issuance of building permits, and any fire hydrant system shall be in operation prior to the time of construction with any combustible materials. 6. get S en1. Where appropriate, the developer Shall install on-site street name signs at the intersections of streets, .as approved by the City Engineer, All signs required by this section shall be installed at approved locations prior to the time the first dwelling unit is occupied. ?. Trees, Preservation of existing tree:-, shall be required where feasible. Any existing mature tree(s) that must be removed shall be replaced at a 7:1 ratio with 36-inch box trees which shall be Incorporated into the project's landscaping plan. 8. 5-memis. All street improvernents shall be completed prior to construction with combustible materials. 27 (W25D) i h` ..M i V. APPENDICI:S A. DEVE1.1JPMENT STANDARDS FOR F.XffiTfNCY SUBDIVISIONS B. DESIGN GTJIDEL114ES 23 I I i tiJM►�, r APPENDIX A DEVELOPMENT" STANDARDS FOR TRACTS 110473, 11905, 11769, 13036, 1 ' 10 rr"sas�t ..]�,L423 and.11 _.1�us�di ic�7al L fs!� Building setbacks within the subdivision shall be as follows: 1. �' ;cJ�: 30 feet or 25 percent of tht lot depth, wlticUver is greater, but does not need to exceed 00 feet. 2. _Y L eSltic`1� : An aggregate of 20 feet with a minimum of S feet on a side. :3. ftaL Yard .•`3f212stck: 23 feet 4. However, if accessory buildings are constructed in the front one—third (1/3) of the lot, they shall conform with the setback requirements of the main dwelling. lWlt 11269 and..1s3Q36 (S,Qn itiottal . . r mitLo lz:. utt'al ark Elm Buildin-g setbacks with-M the sutylivision shall be as follows: 1 . �, ard Se �slttx: 25 Feet for front or side loading garages. 2. I=rjvLSi Ar. YudJZJzcU: An aggregate of 15 feet with a minimum of S feet on one side, provided further that the opposite side yard shall be 10 feet clear to the sky. 3. 51dr-'ard 5etback On the CuVaca r.,Stuu: A 5 foot landscaped buffer area shall be provided adjacent to the equestrian trail. Structures shall be setback 10 feet from the Jandscapu. buffer; 15 feat fronn the trail. 4. RUE a'd Setback: 25 feet 5, R .ear Xard setback aloaz-fjlis Avenue: 25 feet measured from behind the 15 foot wide landscaped buffer. 6. All accessory buildingi shall conform with the setback requirements of the main dwelling. 29 ►) A Itict 1221Q &AIding "tbacks within the subdivislon shall he as follows: 1. FrQrA Yar-d StI4"r --. 25 Net for ail structure-; 2. �1de—Y alli.Setba h,,�: An aggrega to of 15 feet clear to the sky with a mintinum (,A' 5 feet on one side. I Skf.-Yar-J ,etback A 5) foot landscalvii huffor area shall be Provided adjacent to the equestrian trail along a collector - I-L-et. Structures sh-ill be setback 10 feet from .he In"Ackcape 3 J art fron) the trail. 4. &CU _Ck: 25 feet for al I F, i tictures S. '15 fent measure-d from belflj�d the 15 foot wide landscaped buffer 6. All accessory bUildings confo-, ii, Md.:+ dic- setback requirei-m,-rits of thc inain dwelling.;. 7. Encroachment. of archNecturfil features jrro Ade yard setback be urohibited. S. Any developmeric on Lot No, I shall have a first. story setback of 2S feet ITICI second story seta zc of 35 feet from the southern property line. Southeast faclng, second story NvIndows shall be frosted. Any liar J ances to the7�1,- requirements be subject to revievi and approval by the P)-4-nning Commission. 30 (0815D) p v AIIPENDIX B DESIGN GUIDELINES (DESIGN GUIDELINES TO HE ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION AT A LATER DATE AND INCORPORATED 11FREIN) i, 31 (U$Z5D) FBI QUE FOR CITY CC UNCI ACTION Date I Submittdd to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Memb,,arss c� Submittsss+d by: Paul E . Cook, City Adminisstratox �•L ' �, • T Prepared by: Mike Adams , Director of Community aPve lopme : < Subject: ZONE C.HAEGE NO. 89--1JCCDE AKL7MMEWZ NO. � CLARIFICATION OF THE ELLIS-GOLDENW'EaT S.i Consscittent with Council policy? jai Yes [ ) New Policy or Exception C. Statermem of Issue, Recommendation, Armlysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: � ---- _. Trausmitted for you consideration i s a report: which clarifies issues id(antif.ied by the City Council on May 1, 1989 regarding the Ellis-Colde3nwest Specific Plan. Zone Change No . 69-1 and Code Amendment No. 89-1 were appro•,ea by the City Council on May 1, 1989 which established the Ellis-Goldenwest Specific Plan for the if 0 acre yuartersection bounded by Ellis Avenue, Edwards Street , Garfield Avenue and Goldenwest Street . Staff res.omrrsenla that the City Council review tho clarifi.cat:ions as presentad and adopt Ordinance No . 2998 (Second Reading) as prepared by the City Attorney ( Introduction appa:ov;d May 1 , ),989) . l'��: On May 1, 1989 , the City Counc0 certified Environmental Impact Report No. 89-2 and approved "Lone Changes No. 89-1 and Code Amendment No , 89-1 which established the Ellis -Goldenwest Specific Plan for the 160 acre quarter.sesctfon bounded by F114 s Avenue, Edwards Street, Garfield Avenue and Goldenviesst Street . In addition, the City Council directed staff to clarify issues and bring back a report for the June 51 1989 City Council sheeting . The fullow ing is a discussion of the issues identified by the City Council . On May 1.10 :,989, the Ellis-Goldenwest Subcommittee and staff reviewed the concerns of the City Council. Each item was discussed and the recommendation from the meeting supports the 112issss—Goldennwest Specific Plan as origAnally presented except for two i t . 'rho 8ubconw-i L Lac M:d a►:a f f recommend the maximum building height for main structures be increased to 30 fep,t ( 35 feet: to the highcssf, ridge) . Also, the Chapman Squesstrian Trail should be reinstated on the Mantnr trail plan with a width that may vary froin the ezissting 25 feet to a minimum of 16 feet . Ultimate width will depend on a precise drainage study for the parcel located to the east . J/ ^4 a. A public hearing before they Planning Commission will he required to reduce the trail width from 25 feet pursuant to the requirements set forth in original Conditional UEe 7.'ermit . IMICU Ar MrOulatiOnt During staff, subcormnittee and planning Commission evaluation , the circulation design within the quartersection was a major topic of concern . The Planning CommiunioTn approved the internal collector layout with the added provivion that an interim barrier be installed as depicted in Exhibit 6 in the E-11is-Goldenwen. Specific Plan. The interim barrier would prohibit -through traffic from Ellis Aweeiue and Garfield Avenue . The Planning Commission agreed that the interint barrier (emergency access gate) would address the concerns of the ezisting homeuwners in the quart.grsection . The Specific flan i.s structured that all property owners would be notified of a public hearing before the Planning Commission at such time as the intetral collector street: is fully improved within the central 5 acre parcel. area ( see Section T11 .1J .2 .d . in the El lia- Goldenweact Specific Plan) . The Firs Department ha- provided a memo (attachment 2) to Planning Staff which stateK that emergency access to all portionu nf the quartersection will ba provided in a timely manner. 'The interin barrier would be ar. emergency access gate which would be approved by the Fire Departmienh, Public Works , Polio: Department , Planning and Building Dapartments . Through traf.t3c would be prohibited until rjuch time that through traffic. was net:t5sary. The Traffic .Engineer and Planning Staff have responded to the concerns of the residents within the quartersection (see attachment 4 ) . The inter, i in barri.%r will direct general traMc into the private strgets with regidenLial driveways and may reqult in double loading tha arterials with traffic moving from cne r.:rea of the quartersection to another area . Staff doss not recommend any barrier on the internAl collector. An unrestricted collector street allows internal access front within the quartersection to the arterials in a safe and a:-ficient manner . The otheir barrier discussed at the Council meeting is a temporary construction frince Zonated at the northerly boundary of Country View Estates on Qu.5irterhorse Lane, south of Ellie . The temporary fence exists noK aged will rennin during the construction of Davis Dahl ' s subdivisiun. (L;outhesst corner of Ellis and Edwards) on the west side of Quarternor.rae. When eonetructi.on is complete, the fencer will be removed . The Envi, ronmntai impact; )Report discusses traffic projections and levels of service for the quartersection based ,-pon the build-out of the Hoolly-Seaeliff Study Area, the Bolea Chica and the 91JAa-Goldeanwest Specific Plar. quartersection . According to the City Traffic Engineer, level of service "D" is acceptable on the arterials and the only projecting level of service "E" intersection is Yorktown Avenue and Goldenvest Street . ,After improvements to the major arterials, this lavel of service will not exceed a level of service "C" . RCA 6/51S9 (27276) s ltaridentsss within: the quartersection have expressed a desire to crest* ad gated cummunity for the entire quarterssection. The Specific Flan does not prohibit a gated corunusnity and a gated system Mould be subject to approval of a Conditional Use permit by the Planning Commission . Adequate turnaround area outsides the gate would be required and the equestrian tratiles would remain open to the public . A gated system requires approval by 100 percent of the proporty owners since it affects access to their properties and they would shass:e the maintenance cost of such a system. Since this is a unique area, restricted access by a gated system may not be desirous by the community as a whole. If 100 percent of the property owners agree to a gated community, staff will evaluate the proposal and provide a recommendation to the Planning Commission. The Specific Plan does riot require sidewalks to be constructed . The absence of sidewalks create an estate theme and rural, atmosphere established by Country View Estates and Central Park 'staters . Existing easements and provisions private eaoements contained in ovxs for the Specific plan require that: space be set aside for pedestrian use along the sides of the streets . The City Attorney has determined that the absence of paved sidewalks does not create a future liability for the. City. If sidewalks are desired in the future, there is adequate space for them. Although sidewalks are not required, the subcommittee and staff will be exploring the idea of requiring one side of the internal collector street to have a paved s3idesn.ilk. The internal collector would them have a pedestrian orientation on one tide and equestrian orientation on the other . This concept will be discussed as part: of the Ellie-Coldenwest Design Guidelines which will outline further details of the trail design and materials , fencing and landscaping . The intent of the guidelines is to create consistency between the multiple subdivisions . Egme t r LO C1 rsiele.la_U=: Exhibit 6 within the Ellis-Goldenwesst: Specific Plan depicts the master plan for trails within the quarterssect:ion. The Planning Commission directed staff to delete one of three trails which are located on or abut the Chapman »roperty. During the City Council meeting , staff was directed to reinstate the Chapman Trail and determine the necessary widttj of the trail. Since the trail includes a drainage $wale, the exact width will, be determined after precise drainage studies have been submitted for the 10 acre parcel located imaeftaate+ly to the east of the Chapman trail . depending on the conclusion of the precise drainage study, staff facill make a recommendation to the Planning Commission. Many of the homeowners and equestrians have voiced opposition to the deletion of the Chapman trail . Many feel that the trail should remain twenty-five (25) feet in vi slth and should only be :seduced in width if absolutely necessary (see attachment 3) . The ultimates width of the Chapman Trail may vary from the existing 25 feet to a minimum of 16 feet . RCA 6/5/89 -3- ( 2727d) MOM The existing trails along QiAarterhorae Lanes and Saddleback Lane are 8 foot wide which narrows in places because► of the placement of light standards . The Specific Plan requires an additional 3 feet to provide addition spade to maintain a minimum 8 foot laide trail. tread width. Thus , future trails will have a minimum 8 ' clear space . The existing trails along Quarterhorse and Saddleback Lanes can be improved for equestrian trails if the Country View Homeowners .Association desires to improve thiern. The equestrian easement areas have been depicted on the recorded final tract maps . �,2u_Betr ,AA head: The Specific Plan i:equires that any property owner who desires to stable a hares on.-u i to be required to obt L in a Use Pormi t from the Zoning Administtratox . The Ellis• 444oldenwest subcommittee and staff reviewed the request to permit staff to administratively approve the stabling of a horse on-site if all provisions of the Specific Plan i can be met ,. The subcommittee recommends that the stabling of a horse on-site require the approval of a Use Permit by the 'Zoning Administrator in order to notify abutting property owne,-G of this possibility of stabling a horse . Many of ;:he existing lots in Country 'View Estates and Central Park Estates qualify to stable a horse on-site but due to existing pools , %pas and pat4o improvements, major alterations may be re.gttired to sable a horse can-site . l � Pmelit htando-r4a: i The Ellis-Goldenweat subcommittee and staff discussed the possibility of revising the setbacks and height requirements in the Specific Plan . Ecth staff and the cubc onunit:tee recommend that the raaxAmum height be revised from 25 fret: to 30 feet at (maximurtt 35 feet to the ridgeline of the highest roof) . Staff and the subconnittere do not recommend revising the side yard and rear yard setbacks . The side yard setbacks are required to be an aggregate (combined) distance of 20 feet with a minimum of 5 feet on one side. This will result in a greater variation in side yards and Increase the distance between structures to maintain the estate residential atmosphere and cause greater separation of building bulk. The 50 foot: setback for lets 15 , 000% square feet or greater is necessary to provider ample setbacks to habitable structures in order to stable a horse on-site . A reduction in the rear setback may eliminate future stabling on- site. QM ereace corzlB : The Open Space Corridors depicted in Exhibit 8 in the Ellis- Goldenwent Specific Plan corresponds to the 100 year flood areas which preclude development, . The open apace corridors are located on private land which will he maintained by the master Homeowners Association. The open space corridors are not dedicated to the City therefore they remain primate property. Although development in prohibited in the open space corridor, the open sPacs area can be used as recreation space, to graze horses or is an open space amenity. i 'A 6/5/ag -4- (2727d) �a t's k,e anciasUQn: Thear Specific .Plan requires that a ataaastarr homeowner association be crouted for the entire 160 acre quartear.ssection . The master hoaasalowner association will maintain the equestrian trails and the perimeter landscape areas . Each individual association will be: responsible for maintaining the private streets within each tract . VIALmn_ 1�o pram: The Specific Plan reaqui;:es that projects contain a minimum 10 acres. Many of the parcels in the quartersection are 5 acres:' or grealrter, Theses parcels are owned by a single owner or are being processed in conjunction with other parcels which couples with the minias = 10 acre project sire requirement . Located within the quarterseaction are three tracts which contain small lots . The frontage for these lots is 25 feet . Mast of these j loge are located in the low lying areas of they swales . One of they objectives of the Specific Plan is to preserver the cwales as a unique topographical feature. The Specific Plan is .structured so theft if a smaall lot owner requests to build a horse on their lo', or if they can assemble additional lots, their request can be processed with as variance to the 10 acre project sizes requirement . It should be noted that although a variance may be submitted for reduced project size, issues such as adequate access, utilities , resulting re errant parcels , and buil.ddblee area must: be analyzed . If such issues/conc:arnss can be re5olved, the intent of the EGWSP be meat , and Justification for a variance be made, the project may be approved . Staff roust emphasize that the Ellis-Goldenwesst Specific plan is the implementing ordinance of the land use designation of Estate Rosidentiaal - 3 and 4 units per acre . The concern expressed over the permitted density and the requirement !or larger (81000 square fast or greater) lots only reflects the adopted land use designation WAich was approved in 1978 . 1 Ctaaff and they El.liaa-Goldenweest Subcommittee have reviewed the issues i.deantified by the City Council . both staff and the subcommittee a:eaeaaaamend that the city Council adopt the Ellis-Goldenweast Specific Wan with a revision to permit 30 feet height in lieu of 25 feet: as -ariginally proposed and to reinstate the Chapman Trail on the Maanteer Plan of equestrian trails. STAM: Environmental Impact Report No . 88-2 was certified by the City Council on May 11 1909. No further action Ys necessary. Not applicable. RCA 6/5/89 -5- (2727d) ){ AL �TIn ACUM: The F City Council may modify the Ellin-Goldenwest Specific Plan as desired. man 1 . tzhibit A: Stevie d Ellis-Goldenwest Specific Plan a . Ham from Fit* Department dated May 8 , 198D y 3 . Letter and Petition regarding Chapman xrsil dated May 81 1989 4 . Memo from 10raffic Engineer dated May 9, 1989 S . Illustration of 2 foot cut and fill 4 . Illustration of 20 foot aggregate side yard ti 7 . Illustration of Chapman Trail UASRF: lsb i ICa1 8/8/89 i 3737d, a (E �C KRA" CITY CW HUNTIN OTM BKACIK O INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION To otf- i From Sukta-3 Date '' �I M 4 to � '44OL �► • A M �.0v y (f).JX L Vp A#*lr. ! JUL, � + I/wt (I ` {I �s wa i k' A A'i �' C ' 1 Bart•. and Donna f4L1I)e 1 ka 6741 Shire Circle Hunt i ngtun Peach. GA 92645 r 714 ) e47--8"S'54 May p, 1989 City of Huntington Bnach Planning Dapartm ent P. U. 30X i90 2000 Main Street Huntington Dwae h, CA '"7126 U Attna Mike Adams FEi Ellin-Go1denwest Specific Plan Dear Mr. Adams: The City Council approved they L-11 is-Goldenwest Spe,_ if-ic Plan with a number- of iter.i:, to be r-Ovi iEd/amended within a two weep: period. We would like to ser. the Specific Plar. PUt into action as soon as passible but . . . . . . . . . I, 1 . Exhibit S - EquE'Utr ian Trails. i:.:eep the ea':zeinent between the � Chapman residence and Mandic residence. Sovera 1 of Lhe Cou:,cil member-3 r-equp13ted that. the easament in question be 112ft at 21.15 feet wide while others felt: the minium 16 feet recommended by City Planning Department_ ir, sufficient. We houlri like to see the camement remain as recorded 25 feet. This easement i :i our children' s sidewalk and becomes their access to their friends in the other' developments of the qu40rter- section . A Petition was signad by the homeowners ,. f Country view Estate sitatinq their fewlings on that easement (copy enclosed) . 2. Use Permit - to place horses an our property. We are established as an equestrian lot by the City and DUr neighbors). Why should we have to go through the cost and the headache of getting further approval and paying more fees . Wan. already must pull a building permit for- the stallm -- than: should be enough. J. All equestia►n 1©ts ShoUld have some access to the trail syiteft. Futuro develfopments should bear this in mind. And the trail system should be provided to A l l lots that ar a considered equestrain in our development. ' Whw;: you and your staff make the recommendations to the City Council in two waeea,s, plans& take into consideration the above. Bic erelyw T., 1 1 vl v�,, y �db r RAPT AND DONNA KUBELKA 674t Shire Circlw Huntington 1 ac h, CA 9264f,3 Vowne i l "embers My of Huntington Beach P+06 Bare 190 a Main Street Huntington Reach, CA 92648 r: Council e We wish tq communicate atir concern can a par•tlaular issr.re in regards to tha Ellis--Goldenwes t. 8pocific Plan which cume3 before you for vote on May 13 1989. ' EOUE$TRtAN TRAIL -• (Beer Ef;hibit 0 ) The recorded equestrian easement, heer, been remaverl from Troct: No. 11473, Ghaipmam/Mandit boundary (see Aagessor ' s Map attabhud) . We feel it is a premature decision to haves the egtiestr- ian trail. abandoned at this time. Thii* is a public easement and for the Use of all in Country View Estates not• only FOr' the pleariure of r-idinq horses but for wants, jagging or riding bicycles. The deci_;ion to abandon srich a easement should be the decision of the hameowner s at a later date when we are a%smred of the reality of the Specific flan and the continuiti.on of more trails . We also feel it would stet a precedent For abandonment of other equestrian trails/wasemnnts by future residents and/or devalapers. Please holp proserwe our dr-ea.ms. We feel as strongly about this cs most of our neighbors in Criuntry View Estates who have signed the petition regarding the above too* copy of petition attached) . Please help us kavp the arquostr•ian theme alive in our- crmmuni.ty. sincerely$ Dart Kube3k Donna Kubalka l VI rI I MYv. Ci r J yri i HOMP,OWNE'.•:S oP CouivrRY VY >:w ESTATES f` We , the homeowners of Country View Estates oppose the abendonmerst of any recorded horse trail easement ( n ) located In the Ellis -Guldenwest Specific. Platt quarter •action . The ea seutent ( n ) recorded is long-standing And have been in place many years . Pleane help protect our rights to use of the horse trail, essement ( s ) . NAME DRESSU t - r. 4 IL rd < <j ' LA -___---------------- 17 ---------- ----------------------------------------------- -__ww___w-w_-_w_w_-_--_� ------------w-_w__...----------------- ------------------------- __------____---l1.r.w____—_w—_M------F_—__----w_w___•.rr-------------------------------------- 4_M VY._ww__ww__b._�.1_�._—_.__.___.w,..W__w_.ww_R.�M.�iH_�_r+—�.iY Yr_w___w__1__Y.....R i4Yr��R..wV—_Y__�rL•+..� __wwww•wMyiw_w__.w_ra-.y�.,___._w_w_,_.w._r•yw—•A_—u.y_ww.4M_W• .•M.r_-.. r—•ra.__ww.__.w_r•r_w__...Y _—....+._•____�_.___r..,.__._�_.+."_4..�w..�__www..w.__f__w_wwr._.w_"�_w____.+r.._ter._--«.+++_+.+_+—_w..._w_a 1 ,�`M' r ��M N MOMMAMW ►r�� •P4 mo M �s r � t . low UA 0 1 46 do 00 ti LW r: ,, �XI/ 'f � •� M r M .0 i t� 44 Ark N., F o• o FCC- E JAMES 6 CARRIE THOMAS E` 6642 Trotter Drive Huntington Beach , CA 92648 Ccuncilmembers � o City at Huntington B,tac h i� �.` P . O . sox 190 c Huntington leach , CA 92648 Councilmembers s L wish to communicate several concerns which have surf need regarding the proposed Sp.-cific Plan which comes before you for vote May 1 , 1989 , 1 . Equestrian T,-ail - ( Pe-,: Exhibit: 8 ) The recorded equestrian easement han been ramuved from the Chapman/Mandic property . s adamantly oppose the removal of this trail , as it is an esscritial link between the north and south portion of the quartet section . if , at: a future date , this tail proves to be unnecessaty , action should ba taken at the appropriate time for its removal . This trail was recorded at the time property was offered for sale and has been on record many years , 2 . Open Space Corridors 6 Trail. System ( Exhibit D- lb . 31 ) Horse trails should be easily accessible by all equestrian rot owners . According to Exhibit D- 1b . 311 there is no access to the equestrian trail . Tb -a trail on Schleicher has been removed , eliminating access to the trail from Lot 8 , Tract 1, 1805 . The trail should continue `I acrose quarterhorse Lane and continue behind any /all R. de$18natted equestrian lots . Whether this be a public or private easement should be atadc clear and arrangetpente made and on recorded to allow ingress/egress to the trill . The trail shown on quorterhorse Lane does not exist in , Country View Estates . Present homeowners were not aware of the equestrian trail at the time their property van purchased - it was not recorded . Unaware of this trail , :# homeowners hive completed extensive leandscapin,., ( including hardscape ) which obstructs the area where a trail is supposed to exist . Additionally , there are utility roles placed in this area which are not conducive to a horse trail , {• .•,, it r . 1 ell lh, b,l, �u�r RI {I , ' C 1 •IW' 01, IT A■M- Ylti h aim Ik �.� 14:yyi3 y µR• ;rg AM' '1 ' . 1 , +t`I 1 ' y d•1 �i l i uticilwembers Otaa Change 69- 1 /SP ecific Plan Page 2 - 3. Setbacks for Equine Structures - (Exhibit D- 1b . 6 ) r In' ordar, to accommodate existing 'e;quMotrian lots in their affarts to 'maintain equine on the 'promises , it imperative the rear and side yard setbacks should be changed to 10 feet . Many ,• existing homes were placed on the lots in a s.Anner not conducive to stabling horses , ,some rendered unelews as it pertains to eq�-'In* unless the setbacks are changed . Tbese horses should be "Grandfathered" from the 25 ft setbacks to achieve the intent implied . future site planning abould take onsits stabling of horses into consideration an it pertains to setbacks . d . Internal Collector Street Cireulirti,on (Exhibit 6 , D- 1b . 26) Item ds Current homeowners have Approval of the Planning Department to gate the community . The homeowners have unanimously supported the gating of `the area . Developers have agreed to the gating of the quarter section . A plan rhouLd be putt into place and on record for the Implementation of the gate ( s ) . S . P'E'1R -108-2 Mitigation Measures (0-14 . 88) - Commnnity Services developer fees „will be collected to provide a sisighborbood park in the quarter section . The park site should be identified and placed on record to alleviate any ' future misconceptions as to the location of such . koveowhers understand they will be responsible for the maintenance of the park and trope to improve the park with equestrian bend money owed to the association from David Dahl The Planning Comvisollon has done .,a commendable job in ' ttha task of bringing the ISrecif is Plea, to a conclusion . They have worked long said hard to make this work favorably for all concerned . Their efforts have been greatly appreciated by the homeowners of Country View Estates . Bob Franklin has gone beyond 4 :, a call of duty in his efforres to answer the many questions and *eclat in rectifying the many problems encountered . We appreciate his patience and assistance during the process . Your consideration in the items above is greatly appreciated . Respectfully , Y' aT INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION to = File F ram: Bruce H. Gihner x caffic Ergieer Dee = 14a ► 9, 1989 TRUPIC ISSM brie local residents in the subject area have stated ii atedl y their opposition to the ps:�posed road alignnents, predicated on ._heir .w x aeptrion of a !'short cute route that will be more attracUw. to the public than the inpr ved arterial higtwayss jurraundLig the rmiighborhood. This maul wil;. record ny perceptions of the falacies aant„ai ni d in the arg"nts objecting to the planted t d facilities: 1. PEOPLP 41= SPEW ZM3 OAR NLICIIH W-DCM, MMZR= OUR amuoi PIAYIN� IN THE STIMr. 11W rowed system does tot resquiae thrm Vh traffic to enter any of the private st,Lvets, ne►ost of doh are cul-de-sac designs. C'omsec trently, any driver can choose to aster those streets, but it is not required to do so when traveling to t arteri a1 syst-tt. As to •speede� the voluntary cxglLiance..of drivers, parti- cularly arly those livirsrg in the area-, will be. the only su acessfiil solutiaen, just as it is everywhere else. ' 2. im SYSTEM %7M Cliff A %X=--= 70 EGLIS Oil TO GMWMM , Pm kR9= CV OR ON FIINARDS tioldenweast Street is now being designed as a six lame arterial roadway. Es3h rft Street will be built as a four lane roadt 1, just like the .fully imptov'ed sections already constructed. Garfield and Ellis .will. similarly be fully lVzoved to four lane facilities. All of these reds will have separate left turn podwts wing the local street entry points. Given these tsop and absent any extraordinary traffic situation on any of those streets, why would. a driver leave a street where ka or she can travel 45 q* uint*�:ed to the next intersect cn, to drive on a local, resi- dential street at 30 nrh, and then be forced to wait for an opening in the traffic on the street to which they have travelled? For ale, a sout1i1x=d driver an D&mxds would have to make a left turn onto ZUi.s Avenue, probably haviM first to wait for are opening thn7agh which to turn, aril,+L to ifinrse Lane, turn right into that sat reet and proceed awthaarly at a reduced spored, strop at the intersection with Sa&Ueback, and then prod to the intersection with Garfield Avenue, where the driver again wafts for an opening to make a turn into Garfield Avenue. We are asked to believes that this route is mare coo wenient, time saving, and attractive, than driVJM9 corn Ddwards Street to Garfield Avenue and tuning onto Garfield Avenue. It is ray opinion that ow would measure the time lost using the interior street rotate in ndinutes, not seao . That would eliminate that route as a short-cut in short Cordes. �.� . ohm ,I ali4rc � wa8t Tzaffia lamas 1" S, 1989 3. wB Hieve PIOKZ CUT cr CUR ALL WEEKBO T.JWj WrM IO ,FW.'iWr AWD -THE 1001 PRMKM %VL MIS MM IT PASIM TO (Ur 70 OUR WIGMAW=,; MS, MAKW n-'WMW, THAN IT ALMDY '78. 'lit the bow a built in thin area am. of high quali.tyr and att ractIve to -do eye is a 0=a liment to the'bat.]6erS and s. Ttme qualities a►lno =.-eata a desire an tlse part of earns to eixp.,rierm that visual pleasure, •resulting in the " y- ImN syrdrcm degcri.bad by, the residents. Because the areas dFm slapwJ to date axe wall privattely awnad but not closed to publIa use, tx umelc omed' visitoxa .(=wding their street becam .a+ven mare of an' annoyarxm, bei=g concmtrated, vd h ,rirg only oaw way in wA out. We belie'Ve that the full oxotruction of the road system as pl.anrrad will relies• condition f rath it than. wear it. m=m persons. now force in sand out of mie+oar two mall si�ts� wrnad irmtead haw an easily traveled streirt _through the area upon whio'a to "cYviss: the inn ". That does not Arun Woul d ' not enter the local neigWorhood streets to better c e6 ahe hca im o but wmId have a "tht'ough" go=aat to enacxiraga their continued trip out of 4.1e area►. - W ttii.rg short of a fully eacured antxyuay will ccWletely stop. this'.tyF a of sight-weir fmn o=n—IM;, pw;tic ula ly' in such attractive neighbOXhO eAS_ it ix tb keep,�q,mirA t' a ultimate oor fiqursxtich of this 'gwazter s rtL-a 'vhic h will. 3nclueb six -times the 'ram of h now in place. The pxoblew, l�!•�i: 'rw l and anticiptited fttsrg.i.risd W tie c taxent t cxa-Owrmrs :..� 11 a1.eo be .shred by - to new oogsspasnte of the'area. The currint plan ac07:1VIishee ee ta& of aff it g all of the xesidentii!i n the section, ease of mobi 1.ity in lowA g or ret:u=i ng' to their hr see. The.patlw .prsopaeed bo the exterior ce oeri.al, system were �r+seM 'fly cmwiderq3 to pin tt: maxfmian ease of access VUle.maintaii nime effective arA e operation :of the at:t riail facilities. Tb arbitrarily cut off or:eliminate those apia'=;unities based an oondl.ti os which all must. agree-are totaLly. �Y and atypical o'c the full `dEw�s�lopment plant would becaaprici�s and irresspt»�siblA. Th asmwr that: a medharii.sgm for modification of t;he system is. avai.lrabLe:, shdL-ld the assomptioris asad, bxAy not hold true tcaorrcw, wcPild be trrudent and fair. :ik c]c: Bike Adeana, Diremc'tor C amuti ty DeveloFirmt lea Evrsis, City E'gin er ram, Transport atlon coin i.ssion � � A i ra ' nab ' f 1: t i I r ' 1 ' I y r� now am ( zwrcdt&eA4 r.. w 1 r � 1 I t � -44- J s.CA ' Q T • 1111 ..ram• • I ate: _ �., .•_ __. --- - - - ••_..• _.. �._.�.. .._�_I,.,...,.�d. �.�=---- I e� a e a • s o 0 aae q Op Aq • ,C a pega ea of ,• e¢ • sees 0aery4gOa o e ea aq e • v4o oe aaq • eo a 60 p � e o eea 0 0 e a • 0e0•00 \• a a0 0 • a• 4p e ' , ' a aej I q0 A � •p 04, • e i I �y y J�'•�' f 1 IITT . 'r r A4•yM.l r;,ram,-,"�^, S�'I�Flil►G.T�4 1 a • x Wr rN V'V ' 10SWURY 0104, t coRRA �1i3. �� 41'1'1 CALIF. P. o, Box 7303 �r �U HUNTINGTON MACH, CA. 92647 1 '. A 408 IfAANIihT#4N Ir, 09dltaIM to too no L"411111on nod the AcyulNtlon mod pli'tervallom of Alaimo and HINIr,_,Tr1111 "0, Was Banister and Members c of tho C i tar COOK 11 r City of Huntington Beach 20M Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 i RE: Ellis/Soldenwest Specific plan Dear Mayor Bannister and Council Members: We are in''full support of Councils approval of the Ellis/Goldenwest Specific plan. Our comment is about one item that still needs clarification. The width of the trail link between the Chapman and Mandic property. We believe the optimum width is twenty feet making this link cone sistant with the rest of the interior trail system. The intent of this width is to provide useful buffer space between trail users and adjacent property owners. We appreciate your consideration of this suggestion. We would like to; Ake this opportunity to commend the work of Mike Adams, his staff, And the efforts of whe planning Commission And Council in working towards a successful Conclusion to this Specific Plan. Sincerely, MARY B LL Trail Coordinator MB/Jt cc;: Mike Adams, Director, Comaunity Development and Acting Planoing Director Bob Franklin, Assistant Planner r/ . M• o17 r REOUES FOR CITY COUNCIL CTION 01611-01M Ma: 8oscrable Mayor and City Council EV BY CITY (' Paul s. Cook, City Administrators• Michael Adams , Director of Coinmunity • rTry C',i;'�K �r I= CLU= no. 89-1/00t)z A lf6c" NO. 89-1/111 C MC `1OM WITH EWi INPACT J ZMRT AO. 88-2: EU15-M3.1DMMOT 8PAX-CIFIC PLAN cmoftw with rauWf Fwioy? t •r t t Now Policy or Exas"on d , Ot t of IMA, Racvmns�ndation,Am", Funding Source,Aftemetive Acdor:a, Att i hnwntDIV Transmitted for your consideration- is zone Change No . 89-1 and Code Amendment So. .• 89-1 in conjunction with Environmental Impact neport NO. 88-2 which will establish they Ellis-Goldenwest Specific elan for the 160 acre qua:rtersectfon hounded by Bllis Avenue, Edwards street, Garfield Avenue and Goldenwest Ztreet . - I $��. Q�tmmieelc�n ttecomartt ,� , The Punning Commission recommends that the City Council approve Stine nVe No. 89-1 and Code Amendment No. 89--1 and adopt Ordinance Ito. an prepared by the City Attorney. Planning Coanminsion Action on March 21, 1989 : On motion by Slates and second by Williams~, the Planning Commission cep roved Zone Change No . 89-1 and Code Amendment No . 89-1 by the , following vote: Ayes: slates, Williasus, Bourquignon, Ortega $ Mosnt.ford, Leipzig noon: None Absent: Kirkland Abstain: None `t901 , Mo AREHOM - z 89-1: 1. The proposed zone change for the 160 acre quartersecti n fram a mixture of 1tA, Res'd+ential-Agricultural ( 108 acres) , Q--R1, Qualified Low Density Residential (30 acres) , M1, Light Industrial (2 acres) , and LU, Limited Use (20 acres) to Ellis-Goldenwest Specific Plain will be compatible with surrounding residential and industrial land uses basted on the general provisions of the document which addresses permitted uses, circulation and community theme. �ase r 1 , MM proposer sons change is consistent with the goals and pN iQies of the General Plan. The Specific Plan allows nsidential usesi equestrian uses* maintains open space corridors and alows for oil operations * s . Owtion 3 .4 .2.50 Housings of the denetel Plan states that a variety of dousing types shall be provided. The proposed 5"Wific plan allows for Itotate Residential with equestrian amaltiees, which creates a 'neo type of residential housing within the City. b. Section 3 .4 .2.$, Natural Resources, of the General Plan states - that the City shall provide for the proper dervelop ant, preservation and use of the City' s natural taxources for maintaining natural topography and developing greenbelts and preserving natural areas of ve etation where poesi�ble. The Specific Plan preserves significant topographical features and minimizes alteration of th& natural terrain and preaeyrves open space corridors in the Swale arias to accomaodate recreational trails , master plan sewer facilities and drainage from up to 100 year storm. c . Section 3 .4 .2.2. Parks, Recreation and Open Space, of the General plan discusses capitalizing outdoor environmental potential of the City by developing a dystam• of trails and mazimising the preservation of historic, scenic, geological, topographical and ardhaeological sites. In addition to maintaining and pretie' rving the significant topographical fe,aturss of the area, the Specific Plan provides for equestrian uses. 3 . The proposed zone change carries out the General Plan Land Use Designation .of Estate Residential for they Ellis-Goldenwe at area by adding housing variety, increasing spaciousness, and enhancinV the open space character of the area . FM "PYdyM NO. 82-1: 3� . The proposed Code amaidment is convistent with the intent of Section 65450 of the 12ja8niag QnjYAa dri .11eve1oR=nt Laws which establishes State provisions for Specific plants. 3 . Code Amendment go. 69-1 is consistent with the goals and .policies of the Huntington Beach General Plan. f t,af f Rec8mmen on: Stuff recommends that the City Council approve Zone Change No. 89-1 ' and Ccde Amendment No. 59-1 and adopt ordinance No . as � prepared by the City Attorney with the deletion of the interim barrier se depicted on Ezhibit No. 60 page No. 13 of the Draft Ellic -Goldenwest Specific P) rn . Staff Deport - 5/11$9 -2- (2488d) R wP P 4. pd ,r ;' sbse so. ��..1 , i• a request to swan@ the 160 acre 00rasetios baudied by sllis ,Avenue* tdvsrds street, Garfield Ass 60140wa st street from a min of zoning (RA-Residential p+ - malted V9e/M1-Tol bt Industrial/0-21- s dest i s l) to s 11 l s-Gb1de�awer i s e i f i c� Plant Code Low . 81-1 is a request to amond the Huntington beach dance Cade to add the 311is-Gol4enwest Specific Plan to Article 1046 stale has prepared the Draft E111.8-Goldenwgst Specific Plan and has supervised the preparation of a comprehensive environmental impact r at .for the subJect area . based on two public meetings and evmrous meetings between staff and the Ellis-Goldenwgst Subco ltteo (composed of commissioners Ortaga, bourguignon and Slates) , resource agencies, property owners , developers and interested parties, the Draft Ellis-Goldenwgst Specific plan was prepared. It addresses goals, policies and development standards for the Lmplententation of the Estate Residential. General Plan Land Use Designation+ fleneral Plan and tiensikZ; The existing General Plan land use designation for the axtersootion is Estate Residential with a mix of 3 units per acre the northern portion and a units per acre in the southern portion. TM proposed Specific Plan addresses Estate Residential development as the primary permitted use with an overall density of . 3 units per acre. This is consistent with the General Plan Land Use designation and is compatible with ezisting estate residential subdivisions irecontly approved in the quartersection. Circulation within the quartersection is an issue that has , been discussed at great length by .the Ellis-Goldenwgst Subcommittee and property owners. They intisnel collector street layout for the quartersection is similar to the layout proposed 3n the 1982 Draft 211lo-Goldenwgst Specific Plan. it is basically Y-shaped with two access points along Ellis Avenue and a single access point along Garfield Avenue (see Exhibit No. 8 , Page No. 13 of the Draft '!Ills-Goldenwgst Specific Plan) . it should to noted the internal collector street is the same width (curb to curb is 42 feet) as a local street. The basic difference is that no residential driveways will be, permitted access from a collector designated street . staff has proposed the Y-shaped layout to sainimize the number of intersections along arterials thus maintaining better arterial traffic flog. Also, the proposed collector street layout will provide efficient utility planning . A precise plan of the collector street will enable thi proper installation of underground utilities . The proposed continuous circulation pattern for the collector street will diminish traffic on the private streets . Staff Report - 5/1/89 -3- (2488d) 4i mom 'T91 OW "in put as of the proposed internal collector street layout is to ee traffipo c from the interior to the arterials *ad provide 0 within the entire quartersoction. bait 09 the . two public Wwtings, hold on January 36, and Pebrusry 130 it many of the residents of the existing estate residential visions stated o ��►oosition to the staff recommendation of two d #ointo along Xtils Avenue and a Single access point along t *14 Avenue. An alternative ,layout with a discontinuous ileetor street pattern was discussed. The discontinuous pattern would force collector traffic through neighborhoods on primate streets which is not advisable. Also, the discontinuous pattern 09%1 i not provide efficient planning of utilities . After much discussion with staff, the $.11is-Coldenwest Subcommittee voted to support staffs reoaumnded internal collector street layout as proposed in the Draft Specific Plan. At the Karch 21, 1989 Planning Commission meeting, many residents who reside within the existing subdivisions spoke in opposition to the unrestricted circulation pattern. After discurssion$ the Planning Commission voted to modify staff' s recommendation and place on interim barrier at the location depicted on Exhibit No . 6, Sage No . 13 of the Draft $1lix-Goldenwest Specific Plan. in addition, the Planning Commission, directed staff to add language to the Specific Plan: which would require a public hearing at which all property owners located within the 180 acre quartersection prior to the removal of the interim barrier. Staff does not support the Planning Coremission 's recommendation for an interim barrier. In sumury, staff recommenas - the proposed continuous circulation la out without an interim barrier based on efficient planning of utilities, efficient movemant of vehicles within the quartersectirn and reduction of access points along the arterials. Cavity Thema: The proposed Specific plan contains a section on an overall , coa mnity, theme which includes designated open apace corriAors, landscaping treL ')aent, common fencing, equestrial trails, grading limitations and the requirement of a master homeowner ' s association to ensure that all common areas are maintained consistently. The Specific Plan contains a provision to require a twenty-five (15) foot perimeter setback area along all arterials (Coldenwest Street , Ellis Avenue, Garfield Avenue and Edwards Street) which will include landscaping and an eight (a) foot wide equestrian trail. The intent of the perimeter setback area in to provide more r,pen space along the four (4) arterials and enhance the street scene . The landscape treatment and meandering egiisstrisn trail will provide interest as mall an function. The perimeter setback area will provide increased sound attenuation for ?comes with backyards that abut the arterials . An part of the community theme the perimeter setback landscape area, the interior trails and open space corridor& will enhance the estate residential environment . The residents who reside in the existing residential subdivisions indicated to staff that they appreciate the Staff Report - 5/l/89 -4- (2488d) r l h ; M1 ' itio0. Itsbould be noted that all COX00a arias krotto open 0 ace Corridor) will be maintained by ' s Os0ociations Did not the city. A waster homeowner 's too or singlar s hasism will be orested to ensure eo is i uthtibtt and s alatonance of the comma areas . 1 ` 0 folio*-up 4 to staff will prepare a Design 0 bookW, abith weal set forth further details of terax rovi$tons fenncings landscape and community m the la nee is booklet will be reviewed by the Subcommittee and submitted to the Planning Commission for final approval . 86otion #s Povelopment Standards, o€ the proposed Specific Plan C` oontaina a number of development standards which will implement the Vstrte Residential land use designation. The followinj is a general 60iiary of the development standards t (a) Minim m project slae is ten (10) acrers. (b) Overall density of any project shall be a maximum 3 units per gross acre. (c) Minimm lot area shall ,be a,000 net square feet ; 20 percent of the lets shall be 15,000 net squire feet or greater. (d) Minim= lot width shall be 72 feet . (s) Maxima: site coverage shall be 35 percent for multi-stony; 45 percent for single story structures . f) Maximum building height shall not exceed 25 feet or a stories . (q) setbacks : (1) Front yard setbacks shall be minimum 30 feet/maximum 40 feet . (2) Bide yard setbacks shall be an aggregate of 20 feet with a minimum 5 foot dimension on one side . (3) Rear yard setbacks shall be a Minimum 25 feet; 50 feet for 25,600 square foot lots . (h) Grading activities for development shall not exceed two (2) foot cut and fill . Mirror deviations may be permitted subject to approval of special permit . (1) Architectural features shall Yee conducive to an estate, equestrian theme with consistency of architectural character. ileidantial Rgyestrian Zcf W_0A: The propodeed Specific Flan allows for the on-site stabling of horses on individual residential lots ; no common facility required . They fallowing is a general summary of the requirements : Btaff Repoxt - 5/l/59 -5- (2488d) i Ono 11i r{ lot Nine for on-site stabling of horses shall be 4 lot equate fonts f 106eiar for "Rise $hail be 5*0 toot• ` .•i> f�', � 16tO rior side and setbacks shall be 25 feet. (f� psterior sideyard setbacks shall be 15 feet . . r.l., . (l) Seat setbacks shall be 25 feet. (5) General setbacks AhaNll be 50 foot away from any dwelling unit other than on the subject property. (d) Tbe pro *sod Specific Plan contains an equestrian trail system which ofroumvents the perimeter trail and generally follows ' the *xistinq swarles . The perimeter trails will be located within a twenty-five (25) foot easement area which will include landscape areas. The Interior trail system will be sixteen (16) feet wide with an eight (8) foot tread width. The trail system within the Specific Plan area is designed to pribVide, future links with the equestrian trail system in Huntington Ceatrsl Park and with a possible equestrian trail tm !e the proposed Orange County Balsa 'Chico Linear garbs woe psoposed trail network will provide ample riding . i Oil,,,Lgnerations : The proposed Specific Plan addresses the continued operation of oil production with mitigation of sound and visual screaming subject to applicable City regulations . CIVIC District : The requirements of the Civic bistict overlay shall apply to all properties located itranediately adjacent to the Huntington Central Park facility. •fit In conclusion, the Draft Ellis-Coidenwest Specific plan contains developaient standiards# common open space corridors and easements, architectural guidelines, equestrian trails and on-site boarding criteria and an internal circulation layout which will implement the Estate Residential land use designation . Staff has prepared the revio*d Specific Plan in order to establish a coordinated planning effort. Environmenta), Impact Report No. 88-2 was prepared to assess the environmental impacts relative to Zone Change No. 89-1 and Code Amend'•ment No. 89-1. Environmental Impact Rer.ort No . 88-2 represents Staff Report - 5/l/89 -6- (2488d) r' h y ` v i OY asslrsis of the projent. pro *ct-related Impacts# . an& manures intended to alvetss asvirorrmental ,f o9 to any action ate, tone .Change, no. 09-4 and Coda it-i's it is secessarr that tha Cit Council review and ta�C� U oct �s ort 50. $8-0. All �dtagvested .. as in ssv to► at• ir�►�rt spa*PM . ;�► i c,00tated: into the hp"1910 Plan. All subaolr+e"t r . . "Obis r in oanlaic"Aco witb this x1lis-0014enuest 64 on N �11 b►* a ve red by Inv i rarnaant a l Impact Napo r t fto fto I;Ity Couzc?',I: may modify tone Change go. 99-3 snd Code Amen&mnt . go# 69-1 as desired. , • 1 Ar�a .,��p. 2. sdipeitsaN t3mlbit A: Dreft mis-dolden"ext Specific Plan #. LOtter frott lguertrain ,Trails dated receiv04 on Xarch, x0. 1989 S. �ttiprs From Martgeret Li Lindsay dated recsive',d April 10,, Ka tCh 22, '+, �ohruary 15, 1999 AM;RLY;ads, Staff Report -- 5/1/89 -7- (2488d) t E I ♦ ��_l y;�ir'h '_ •/f IIrNy ti � r/ t. 4►n/u� � �*•r L f f. 1► � ♦ Yltlq �� 14 w�wr 1 Ir- 1I� ► �. 1" 1 Ir va NAN -• - �r �r �- =�r rrr: � te = � ar; .: r�� != rrr= 1�11rrr rrr ::w1 1111 = MIr..�411'= lilts kw III'I_ I I11J I1Nnatill IUIfaN�w�� Ire 1frMuun� tunnw►. .. 111✓.. '_r 1 r��=�__�r7:���_� _ „►liililill,�., w1Aw III/I Y ryry J i r.rl 11 inul nnu ���■ ■ �1 _.11* 1 - 1" . t_ i*1tiy 1� ten' lh404) Ir.'r.'iai;'I�� Ir' �;: 'Y,„r,1yf'•rll*11' •i' i 1 01TV Or , H INIVR-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION r rlx.I "toAt#.c�►�uy From ComUe Sue"g, City CCeth *f E. '.e ► ��pe . P�atn C / 5/t 89 and matted out � h�.n8: the Z04d&=ro#tce pubWhed in the paper/u*&- a red nca ftAa8 LQ,b 'lki-'C&Ar 1: but 'maA culopt¢d the F•f.wt CxR. d!t .the ageiuk t muA hF."Jekenced -bath,'warye• I; ^,amwt btu CC pkobtai on thoU but x w�at4t2d x`a nun .t b .you. The mixucteb ,uc�.P. .We the hr caned on the Vna t but aeL on on the FixV, ,1 6 Co"At e r ,1 1 1'q d� 1 Pub.L1sh : 4/20/89 VOTICE OF PUBLIC MMING ZONE CHANGE NO. 8 9-1/CODE AIMNDMENT NO . 8 9-1 I H CONJUNCTION WITH DRAFT SNW I RONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 3 8-2 (R**6nQ 160 acre quartereection to Ellia-Goldenwast Specific Plan) „ 15 ` **BY Q1VZN that tho Huntington "Desch Cil:y� Council will B. P lfo Oaring in the Council Chamber at the' lluntingt�on Beach Cater, 2606 $.ain NtYeet , Huntington 3each, C,aliforni. a , on the lots= Wid at the time' indicated below to receive and, consider the i;t�.teftvtr of all parsons who wish to be heard relfatiwe ' to the it'cetion described below. Monday, May 11 1989 , 7 : 00 PM Zone Change No . 89-1/Code Amendment. No 89-1 in conjunction with Draft Enwi.ronmantiil Impact Repot No. 88-2 A1!2LI #T: City of Huntington Beach 160 acres located in :the southeast quarter �.-f Sectioh, Areb 34 , Towhship ' 5 Sou .-h, R6nge 11 feat , bounced by Ellis Avenue , Edt4ards `, Strest; c:arf ield Avenue and Goldanwest Street (sea attached map) . Mixture of .RA (Residential Ayri6,u1tur•a3) ; Q-Rl . (Qualified Low Density Ttesiden'ti.al) ; M1 (Light Industrial) ; andLU (Limited use) . � PBS OSAL ;' (1) Zone Change_ : To rezone the subJ1sct propsrty from v' mixture of, VA (Residential A%iricultural) ; Q-R1 (Quiklified. haw Density Reside-#ial) ; M1 (Light Industrial) ; and LU (Limited "lUse) . to 21lia-Goldenwest Spec 4fic Plan, (Z) Cam gadMg t.: To amend the Huntington, Beach Ordinance Code , Article 930., and establish the Ellis- Goldenw,_st 6pecific Man. Y1100M 1T L STATLIfl : Project covered by, graft Envir' onmenial Impact Rep6rt No . 88--2 . The City Council must certify Draft Enviri ohmental 'Inrpadt Report No . 88-2 prior to approval of Zone Change No . 89--1. and Code Amendment No . 89-1 . 1 1l1/by � r 4)I�YII� r , I >r r� V j ♦:�i� inu►ri�- t�;u,-- -- �`.� I11�� � ..ter�► :� �".1• �`: � '"� �!��, '��' - - �' 11�1111111 II�In�I ..� • f �� �Il��- � "` IIHn1111N111 - Ilk it its!it I I I r 1TI�a I� '1 I I ��I��1� ■ & wl f ■ . ��Y Yr l/ I _ Ifni�►'�I I t'�`I