Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Zone Change 91-2 - Environmental Assessment 91-13 - Stevenso
STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Orange I am a Citizen of the United States and a PUBLIC NOTICES resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the LEGAL NOTICE ORDINANCE - age of eighteen years, and not a party to or No AN ORDINANCE OF interested in the below entitled matter. I ant a THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH principal clerk of the HUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTINGTON A DING THE BEACH INDEPENDENT,. a newspaper of generalORDINANCE CODE ci=lation, printed and published in the C;y of E AMENDING SECTION 9061 THERETO TO Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of PROVIDE FOR California,and that attached Notice is a true and CHANGE OF ZONING FROM complete copy as was printed and published in "MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL"TO the Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley "MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY issues of said newspaper to wit the issue(s) of: RESIDENTIAL"ON REAL PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED December 26 1991 ON TH ACRES ON THE EAST SIDE OF HUNTINGTON STREET APPROXIMATELY 310 FEET SOUTH OF THE CLAY AVENUE CENTERLINE. (ZONE CHANGE 91.2) SYNOPSIS: Ordinance No. 312 amends the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code to; change the zoning on! property on the east side of Huntington Street south. of Clay Avenue from me- diem density residential to medium high density resi- dential. THE FULL TEXT OF THE ORDINANCE IS AVAIL- ABLE IN THE CITY l,.declare. under penalty of perjury, the CLERK'S OFFICE ury� ADOPTED by the City foregoing Is true and corr�t. Council of the City of Hun- tington Beach at an regular meeting held Monday, De- cember 16, 1991, by the Executed on Derember 26 ' 199 following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers: at Costa Mes Cafifomia. R o ison,l W Moulton- Patt brson Winchell, Silva, Green,MacAllister,Kelly NOES: Councilmembers: None _ ABSENT: Councilmem- bers:None Signature CITY OF H U N- TINGTON BEACH, Con- nie Brockway, City Clerk Published Huntington) Beach Independent De- cember 26,1991 j 124.0441 PROOF OF PUBLICATION i ;, CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH `'� 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK December 3, 1991 Stevenson, Porto, Pierce Attn: Ignatius 18195 McDurmott East D & E Irvine, CA 92714 The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held Monday, December 2, 1991 approved Zone Change 91-2 and Environmental Assessment No. 91-13. Minutes of the Council meeting will be mailed to you when completed. Please call the Community Development Director for further information - 536-5211. Connie Brockway, CMC City Clerk = CB:ln 1073I cc: Community Development Director (Telephone:714-536-5227) "STATE OF CALIFORNIA ' C' County of Orange I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the ` age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the below entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the HUNTINGTON BEACH INDEPENDENT, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of Califomia, and that attached Notice is a true and complete copy as was printed and published in the Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley PUBLIC NOTICE REQUEST: A request to issues of said newspaper to wit the issue(s)of: NOTICE OF Permit a form R2 (hedge in zoninMedium Densitg PUBLIC HEARING Residential ) to R3 (Me- November 14, 1991 ZONE CHANGE ' Resi- dential) for a si 20 foot ty by NO.91.2 130 foot strip of property ENVIRONMENTAL adjacent to an existing 13 ASSESSMENT NO. unit apartment building. If 91.13 approved,the zone change (Zone change would allow for two (2) ad- ditional units instead of the to allow for lot one (1) additional unit that would by allowed by cur- expansion and rent zoning. A two (2) unit construction of roject is approved on the two(2)additional 'site pending adoption by apartments) the Cityan Council of the NOTICE IS HEREBY Zone Chge. GIVEN that the Huntington ENVIRONMENTAL STA- t Beach City Council w11 hold TUS: This project is cov- a public hearing in the ered by Environmental As- Council Chamber at the sessment No. 91-13 which Huntington Beach Civic will also be considered by Center, 2000 Main Street,.Council. Huntington Beach, Califor- COASTAL STATUS: Not nia, on the date and at the applicable time indicated below to re- ON FILE: A copy of the ceive and consider the proposed request is on file statements of all persons,in the Community Develop- who wish to be heard rela-,ment Department, 2000 live to the application de- Main Street, Huntington scribed below. Beach, California 92648, DATE/TIME: Monday, De- for inspection by the pub- declare, under penalty of perjury, that the cember 2,1991,7:00 PM lic. A copy of the staff re- APPLICATION foregoing Is rue and corrmt APPLICATION NUMBER: teres eort �d parties ll be available to Hao "� 9 Zone Change No.91.2 and: Y Environmental Assessment'Or. the Main City Library No.91-13 i(7111 Talbert Avenue) after November 14 r APPLICANT: Stevinson November 27,1991.. Executed on , 199 L- Porto and Pierce,Inc. ALL INTERESTED PER- LOCATION: East side of SONS are invited to attend at Costa Mesa, California. Huntington Street (Vacant said hearing and express strip of property ap- opinions or submit evi- proximately two hundred- dence for or against the eighty (280) feet south of application as outlined Clay Drive above. If there are any fur- ZONE: R2 (Medium Den- ther questions please call Signature sity Residential) planner at n6ike r, ,ssistant Connie Brockway, City Clerk Published Huntington Beach/Fountain Valley In- dependent November 14, 1991. 112-888 ��r 3� PROOF OF PUBLICATION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING • ZONE CHANGE NO. 91-2 U ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 91-13 "rn (Zone change from R2 to R3 , to allow for lot expansion and construction of two (2) additional apartments) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, December 2, 1991, 7 :00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No. 91-2 and Environmental Assessment No. 91-13 APPLICANT: Stevinson Porto and Pierce, Inc. LOCATION: East side of Huntington Street (Vacant strip of property approximately two hundred-eighty (280) feet south of Clay Drive) ZONE: R2 (Medium Density Residential) REOUEST: A request to permit a change in zoning from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to R3 (Medium-High Density Residential) for a 20 foot by 130 foot strip of property adjacent to an existing 13 unit apartment building. If approved, the zone change would allow for two (2) additional units instead of the one (1) additional unit that would be allowed by current zoning. A two (2) unit project is approved on the site pending adoption by the City Council of the Zone Change. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: This project is covered by Environmental Assessment No. 91-13 which will also be considered by Council . COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City Clerk' s Office, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library (7111 Talbert Avenue) after November 27, 1991. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If there are any further questions please call Mike Connor, Assistant Planner at 536-5271 . Connie Brockway City Clerk (1174d) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CHANGE NO. 91-2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 91-13 (Zone change from R2 to R3 , to allow for lot expansion and construction of two (2) additional apartments) . r- NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Counci will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntin on Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, Califor la, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and con der the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relativato the application described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, November 18, 1991, 7: 00 ,PPM APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No . 91-2 and/ Environmental Assessment No. 91-13 APPLICANT: Stevinson Porto and Pierce, nc. LOCATION: East side of Huntington S reet (Vacant strip of property approximately o hundred-eighty (280) feet south of Clay Drive)- ZONE: R2 (Medium Density R sidential) REQUEST: A request to 'permi • a change in zoning from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to R3 (Medium-High Density Residential) for 20 foot by 130 foot strip of property adjacent to an existing 13 unit apartment building. If :a�pproved, the zone change would allow for two (2) additional units instead of the one (1) additional unit that would be allowed by current zoning. A two (2) unit project is approved on the site pendifdg- adoption by the City Council of the Zone Change. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: This project is covered by Environmental Assessment No. 91-13 which will also be considered by Council . COASTAL STATUS: 7 Not applicable ON FILE: A co y of the proposed request is on file in the City Clev' s Office, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, Ca ifornia 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy o the staff report will be available to interested 1�arties at City Hall or the Main City Library (7111 Talbert Avenue) after November 13, 1991. ALL INTE ESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as out ined above. If there are any further questions please call Mike onnor, Assistant Planner at 536-5271. Connie Brockway City Clerk NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CHANGE NO. 91-2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 91-13 (Zone change from R2 to R3, to allow for lot expansion and construction of two (2) additional apartments) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, November 18, 1991, 7:00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No. 91-2 and Environmental Assessment No. 91-13 APPLICANT: Stevinson Porto and Pierce, Inc. LOCATION: East side of Huntington Street (Vacant strip of property approximately two hundred-eighty (280) feet south of Clay Drive) ZONE: R2 (Medium Density Residential) REOUEST: A request to permit a change in zoning from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to R3 (Medium-High Density Residential) for a 20 foot by 130 foot strip of property adjacent to an existing 13 unit apartment building. If approved, the zone change would allow for two (2) additional units instead of the one (1) additional unit that would be allowed by current zoning. A two (2) unit project is approved on the site pending adoption by the City Council of the Zone Change. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: This project is covered by Environmental Assessment No. 91-13 which will also be considered by Council . COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City Clerk' s Office, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library (7111 Talbert Avenue) after November 13, 1991. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If there are any further questions please call Mike Connor, Assistant Planner at 536-5271. Connie Brockway City Clerk ?37-19-132 937-191143 937-16-399 .Evans T.Vasil R.Smith l'0351 Sealorse Ln. #203 7531 Seabluff Dr. #103 7582 Seabluff Dr. �Gl luntington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 a37-19-133 937-19-144 937-16-407 ).Mora Y".Kizuta D.Schrock 19351 Seahorse Ln. #205 7531 Seabluff Dr. #104 19432 Pompano Ln. luntington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 937-16-383 a37-19-134 937-19-145 C.White 1.Carrow R.Hensley 19412 Pompano Ln. 19351 Seahorse Ln. #204 7531 Seabluff Dr. #105 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 luntington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 937-16-393 )37-19-135 017-l9-146 J.Thompson IO' d.Adams C.Fredrickson 7582 Seabluff Dr.. 19351 Seahorse Ln. #104 7531 Seabluff Dr. #106 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 luntington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 937-16-397 N.Vogt 937-19-147 I37-19-136 7582 Seabluff Dr. ��.Carlton G.Werner 19351 Seahorse Ln. #206 7531 Seabluff Dr. #107 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 -luntington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 937-19-137 93.7-19-148 W.Cottle C.Summers 19351 Seahorse Ln. 7531 Seabluff Dr.#108 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 937-19-138 937-16-419. W. Pratt J.Mueller 19462 Pompano LN. ' 4V7 19351 Seahorse Ln. #20$ Huntignton Beach,Ca.92648. luntington Beach,Ca.92648 337-19-139 Representative: R.Hudson S.tevenson,Porto,Pierce 19351 Seahorse Ln. #106 Attn. Ignatius luntington Beach,Ca.92648 1-8195 Mc Durmott East#D&E Irvine,Ca.92714 )37-19-140 3.Scheider 9351 Seahorse Ln. #207 luntington Beach,Ca.92648 137-19-141 ' _.Rossebo 531 Seabluff Dr. #101 ':untington Beach,Ca.92648 937-19-142 F.Ogden 7531 Seabluff Dr.#102 llunti.ngtun Banch,Ca.92648 37-1,9-09z 937-19-110 937-19-121 Lauer S.11natt G.Fong 332 Seaspring Dr#102 7552 Seaspring Dr. #106 7562 Seaspring Dr.#102 untington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648- 37-19-095 937-19=111 937-19-122 ' .Valentin J.Ortale C.Sailor 532 Seaspring Dr.#204 9601 Jura Dr. 7562 Seaspring Dr. #204 untington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92646 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 937-19-1-23 37-19-096 937-19-112 j G. Arhdt .Chandler D.Dess ; 7562 Seaspring Dr. �D? 532 Seaspring Dr.#103 j 7552 Seaspring Dr. #108 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 untington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 j 937-19-124 �37-19-097 937-19-113 J.Cross �. Bryan J.Bondi -532 Seaspring Dr. #20b 7552 Seaspring Dr.#109 7562 Seaspring Dr. ?untington Beach,Ca.92648 I Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 i 937-19-125 )37-19-098 937-19-114 S.Lucido Pickford K.Boies 7562 Seaspring Dr..#104 ,532 Seaspring Dr. #104 j 7552 Seaspring Dr. #110 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 luntington Beach,Ca.92648 ' Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 g ' 1?37-19-099 9-37-19-115 937-19-126K.Packman R.Weis ' W.Hsu I 7562 Seaspring Dr. #205 7532 Seaspring Dr. #205 7552 Seaspring Dr. #111 :-iuntington Beach,Ca.92648 I Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 �937-19-105 937-19 937-19-].27 .-116 937-1 D.Adam J.Crawford' 19351 Seahorse Ln. #101 7552 Seaspring Dr. #101 7552 Seaspring Dr. #112 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 :luntington Beach,Ca.92648 i Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 937-19-128 917-19-106 937-19-117 71.'.L•aburt ,A. Torres A. Chevalier 19351 Seahorse Ln. 4201 7552 Seaspring Dr.#102 7562 Seaspring Dr.#202 1luntington Beach,Ca.92648 !luntington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 937-19-107 -''-8 937-19-129 R.Gan T. Kirksey F.Schneider 7552 Seaspring Dr. #103 7562 Seaspring Dr. #201 19351 Seahorse Ln. #102 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 937-19-108 937-19-119± 937-19-130 D.Waterman M.Coffelt D.Bock 7552 Seaspring Dr#104 7562 Seaspring Dr. #101 19351 Seahorse Ln. #202 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 g37,-19-120 937-19-131 937-19-109 S.Sooter B.Penfield 7562 Seaspring Dr.#203 R. Fredman Huntington Beach.Ca.92648 19351 Seahorse Ln. 'iitn-k Y37-ly-072 937-19-083 '.Diaz M.Celestin R.Levine 9351 SunrayLn. #204 19342 Sunray Ln. #101 19311 Sunray Ln. #203 luntington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 . I 137-19-062 937-19-073 _ 937-19-084 � S.Savage 1.Burns 19342 Sunray Ln. abj K.Rose 9351 Sunray Ln.#103 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 19311 Sunray Ln. #102 luntington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 )37-19-063 illespie 937-19-074 937-19-085 :.G 93il Sunray Ln. S.Layton P.Ankeman luntington Beach,Ca.92648 i 19342 Sunray Ln. #102 19311 Sunray Ln. #204 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 )37-19-064 937-19-075 937-19-086 I.I. Mc Kinley R.Amadril D.Stockwell -9351 Sunray Ln. #104 19342 Sunray Ln. #204 19311 Sunray Ln.#103 'untington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 137-19-065 937-19-076 937-19-087 _. Simpson D.Ward B.Ostovarpour 9351 Sunray Ln. #206 19342 Sunray Ln.#103 19311 Sunray Ln.#206 luntington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 )37-19-066 937-19-077 937-19-088 !.Harden I L.Williams J.Morton .9351 Sunray Ln. #105 ; 19342 Sunray Ln. #206 19311 Sunray Ln. #104 untington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 937-19-067 M/.O'Brien 937-19-078 937-19-089 19351 Sunray Ln. .4,20 C.Hawkins T.Elliot Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 19342S.unray Ln. #104 19311 Sunray Ln.#205 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 ,37-19-068 937-19-079 937-19-090 .Walker R.Hartman A.Thomas 9351 Sunray Ln. #106 19342 Sunray Ln#205 16691 Bloomfield Ave. ;untington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 Cerritos,Ca.90701 I °37-19-069 i 937-19-080 937-19-091 ',}loida M.Metchikoff B.Tvrrell 9351 Sunray Ln.#207 19311 Sunray Ln. #202 7532 Seaspring Dr. untington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntingotn Beach,Ca.92648 937-19-070 R.Stlaurent 937-19-081 937-19-092 19342 Sunray Ln. S.Ota N.Fredrich Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 19311 Sunray Ln.#201 7532 Seaspring Ur. #101 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 37-19-071 937-19-082 937-19-093 .Hummes R,Uliana J.Ingram7532 Seaspring Dr. #203 9342 Sunray Ln.#201 19311 Sunray Ln. #101 p g untiMILon Aeech,Co.92G48 lluntington Bcach,Cn;92648 Huntington Beach,Co.92648 bu. 1).NuLtke 937-1G-382,392 68,1N.Beard 7641 Clay Ave. :19235 llelware St. Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 M.Missig Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 159-341-17 19412 Pompano Ln. #102 159-341-05 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 G9. R•Daugherty 81.. M.Romerosa 937-1.6-388 ` 19241 llelware St. 7635 Clay Ave. - C,Vaughan Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 19412 Pompano Ln. #108 159-341-06 159-341-18 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 70. D.Knoedler 82. E.Urquhart 937-16-389 19245 Delware St. 7631 Clay Ave. N.Genebach Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 19412 Pompano Ln. #195 159-341-07 159-341-19 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 71. M. Clifford I 83. I. Brode 937-16-390 7631 Clay Ave. 7625 Clay Ave. T.Scheffler- Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 I Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 19412 Pompano Ln. #110 159-341-08 , 159-341-20 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 72. -M.Mackb 84. A. Carr 937-1-9-056 7685 Clay Ave. 19246 Huntington St. R.Hill Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 19351 Sunray i. Z 159-341-09 159-341-21 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 73. S. Daunt i 85. , T. Gary 937-•-19-.057•. 7681 Clay Ave. 19242 Huntington St. V.Mala•fronte Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 19351' Sunray-.Ln,#; Ol 159-341-10 I 159-341-22 Huntington :Beach,C4.92648 I 74. K. White 7675 Clay Ave. � 86.D• Santucci 937-16-417 19240 Huntington St. L.Kennedy Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.9-2648 19462 Pampano Ln.. #105 159-341-11 159-341-23 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 037-16-418 6 7 H.Noble 4 87. R. Wileman J.Mayer Hunti ngton Clay Ave. I 19236 Huntington St. 19462 Pompano Ln. #106 untington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington- Beach-,Ca.92648 159-341-12 159-341-24 77. L.Nangers 88• L. De Crognale 937-19-058 7661 Clay Ave. P.O. Box 5446 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 Carson, T.Wiczynski 159-341-14 Ca.90749 19351 Sunray Ln.. #101 159-341-25 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648- 78. W. Hayden 89. C. Magana 937-19-059 7655 Clay Ave. P.O.BOX 135 D.Nottke Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 19351 Sunray Ln. �03 159-341-15 159-134-01 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 79. J.Talley I 937-1G-381,385-387,391 ,392,394- 937-19-060 18662 Auburn Ave. 416,419-425. F.Yauney Santa Ana,Ca.92705 Mansion }sill 19351 Sunray Ln. #102 159-341-16 520 Broadway #100 I banLa MuniCH,l:a.YU4Ui ii�l►ik+n�et.riri Aabali,�deQ�Ih4R 44. C. Olsen 55. D. Spengler S.Weltsh 2617 Del Way 15 Selware St-C Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 10666 Westminister Ave. Garden Grove,Ca.92643 tntington Beach,Ca.92648 25-063-24 25-111-51 063-06 . L. Richard M. Cross 56. N. Pilest• ,.. )15 Delaware St. "B" 2605 - D Del Way -35 Goleta' Pt. :ntingtin Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 Corona Del Mar,Ca.92625 -)-063-07 25-063-25 •25-111-52 >. R.Labastida Jr. 46. J. Sanger 57. Yie-Ming Hong %46 Clairemont Mesa B1. 2612 - A Del Way 8432 Satinwood Cir. in Deigo,Ca.92117 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 Westminister,Ca.92683 >-063-08 25-063-29 25-111-53 i �. B.Reinhold 47. M.Nortenson 58. C.Elerding -)09-D Delware St. 2612- B Del Way 10602 Chapman Ave. .intington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 Westminister,Ca.92640 5-063-09 25-063-30 25-111-54 48. K.Partridge 37. M. Pijl 2612 Del Way 59. F. Wareh 2635 Del Way Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 504 Clay Ave. Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 25-063-31 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 25-063-17 25-112-01 - 8. E. Siegel/S. Provencal 49. L. Allaire 60. ,61. Pacific Ranch Homeowi 625 - C Del Way 2612 -D Del Way 520 Broadway #100 untington Beach,Ca-.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 Santa Monica,Ca.90401 5-063-18 25-063-32 23-411-02,03. ,9. J.Martinez 50. F. Cuff 62. Corp. Of Presiding Bisho;' 50 E. North Temple St. 625-B Del Way 2606 - A Del Way :untington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 Salt Lake,UT 84150 5-063--19 25-063-33 159-151-12 0. J. Boyce 63,64. Huntington Beach Co. k y � 51. M. Van De Vanter 2110 Plain St. 625 -A Del ay P.O. Box 2445 each,Ca•.92648 B untington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92647 159-31 Huntington on B 7 5-063-20 25-063-34 1. J. Nichols 52. E. ,Geib 65. M.Yamin 9711 Oceanaire Cir. 2281-C Canyon Dr. 19221 Delwa-re Dr.untington Beach,Ca.92648 Costa Mesa,Ca.92627. Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 5-063-21 25-063-35 159-341-02 2. M.Paxson 66. C.Parsons/ D. Heck 617- C Del Wa 53. M. Garcia 19225 Delware St. Y 2701 Canary Ur.untington Beach,Ca.92648 Costa Mesa,Ca.92626 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648159-341-03 5-063-22 25-111-49 3. L. Thompson 54. G.Newton 67. B.Bryan 617 - B Del Way 610 Avocado Ave. 19231 Delware St. untington Beach,Ca.92648 Corona Del Mar,Ca.82625 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 5-063-23 25-111-50 . . •• � • - ' J' Owner List 11. H.Monck 23. First United Church� 2721 17th St. N, 025-06' -34,36 35 303 Cleveland Dr. e.;pared .By Cathy McDermott Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 91 714-970-6157 I 25-061-22 i 25-061-34 ' 23. "All R.Adams 12. A .Yeiser 061 Edye Dr. ! 302 Cleveland Dr. 25e061836 ntington Beach,Ca.92646 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 061-04 25-061-23 ' I G.Bosiljevac 13. R.Shirley ' 24.So Cal 88 Assoc.2700 17th St. -5 Cleveland Ave. i 2702 Huntington St. Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 intington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 061-05 25-061-24 j 25-062-01 L.Mueller 14. J.Kroepil 25. T. Wong 21 Cleveland Dr. 2620 Huntington St. 6881 Los Amigos Cir. intington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 + Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 -061-06 25-061-25 25-062-15 i . J. Waldron 15. J.Timpone I 26. B.Imamura 20 Cleveland Dr. 2614 Huntington St. 14632 Newland St. ton Beach,Ca.92648 I Midway City,Ca.92655 untin g Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 25_Q62-22 -061-07 j 25-061-26 i i ' 27. M: Nielsen D.Lornell 16. G. Pitts 2702 17th St. .14 Cleveland Dr. 2608 Huntington St. untington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648. -5-061-08 i 25-061-27 25-062-23 3. R. Griffin � 17. J.Harris 28. L.Cox 08 Cleveland Dr. II 2607 17th St. ii 2623-D- Delware St. `untington Beach,Ca.92648 ` Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 ! Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 .5-061-09 25-061-28 -- .. 25-063-01 29.D.Kohn S.Erickson * :18. J. Whelan 2623 Delware St. '611 17th st. I 3140 Red Hill Ave. #150, iuntiiigton Beach,Ca.92648 Costa Mesa,Ca.92626 )luntington Beach,Ca.92648 _5-061-16 25-061-29,30,35.,36. ; ; 25-063-02 30. D:Woon i. D.Gomes 19. See #18 _1625 17th St. ' 25-061-30 2623-B Delware St. Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 25-061-17 25-063-03 a. V. Lehnoff 20. 31. S. Flannagan 2619 17th St. See #18 2623 -A Delware St. iuntington Beach,Ca.92648 2S-1 bl - 3S Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 ?5-061-18 25-063-04 21,22. General Elliott 32. J.Gross 10. D.Maldonado 403 Clay Ave. 2623 17th St. P.O. Box 224 Auntington Beach,Ca.92648 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 Westminister.Ca.92683 „11 � „ 25-061-32.33 25-nri_nc ; s7-i91-34 iiathieson, Rono 937-191-34 Carrow, Joseph R 937-190-97 Bryan, David W ,04=001i193z)1 Seahorse Ln �03 04-001 10221 Wesley Cir 04-001 P 0 Box 28 :Huntington Beach, ca 92e40" Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 Avalon, Ca 90704 937-191-08 Torres, Antonio G 937-190-79 Hartmann, Robert 04-001 16619 Bloomfield Ave 04-001 1502 N Broadway Cerritos, Ca 90701 Santa Ana, Ca 92706 )37-190-66 Stockwell , David F 937-190-88 Chapman, Timothy D 937-190-91 Tyrell , Brian 04-001 Consldted Fire Dpt 1100 04-001 Chapman, Timothy Dean 04-001 7532 Seasprigg #201 =ltact Yokosuka, Japan 19311 Sunray, #104 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 u Box Hi Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 :PO Seattle, Wa 98762 )37-190-64 Reichert, Eric E 937-190-66 Harden, William R Tr 159-341-19 Urquhart, Ellen 04-001 19361 Sunray Ln #104 04-001 P 0 Box 1831 04-001 P 0 Box 408 luntington Beach, Ca 92649 Rancho Mirage, Ca 92270 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 i9-341--3 Santucci , Danny C 159-341-25 Del Crognaie, Louis, 159=341-02 Yamin, Mike Mahmoud 04-001 602 17th St 04-001 P 0 Box 2157 04-001 33 Goleta Point Dr luntington Beach, Ca 92648 Wilmington, Ca 90748 Corona Del Mar, Ca- 92625 �9-341-04 Byram, Blaine 159-341-08 Clifford, t1ark 159-3EI-2 Chavez, Patricia Anr: 04-001 10660 Killdeer St NW 04-001 7691 Clay Ave C4•-OC1 7675' Clay Ave -oon Rapids, Mn bb433 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 hLrA-. rirtcrt Eeac:h, Ca 92G )�5-1i1-54 Eldering, Charles E 025-111-49 Askins, Gregory James 025-111-50 Newton, Gary G u4-0001 36 Linda Isle 04-001 553 Cliffwood Ave 04-001 2800 Bayview Dr vewport Beach, Ca 92660 Brea, Ca 92621 Corona Del Mar, Ca 92625 )cb-111-bc Wong., Shui King 025-111-53 Ho, Ju-Chu Tr 025-061-18 Lenhoff, Vincent P u4-Oul 2013 Huntington St 04-001 Hong, Yie-Kling Williams, Lenhoff Carol luntington Beach, Ca 92G48 645 Catalina Rd 364 Jasmine St Fullerton, Ca 92635 Laguna Beach, Ca 92651 j25-061-19 Swan, Billy 025-061-33 Justice, Dorian Barry, 025-062-01 TCC So Cal 88 Assoc 04-v01 14332 Greenleaf St 04-001 Elliott, Gerald T 04-001 2225 W Commonwealth Ave Sherman Oaks, Ca 91423 18081 Shandel Dr Alhambra, Ca 91803 Santa Ana, Ca 92705 )26-062-23 Nielsen, Marcia 025-063-17 De Jong, Gerald J 025-063-32 De Arman, Gary P 04-001 L70L 17th St 04-001 Pijl , Michael 04-001 2612 - D Delway luntington Beach, CA 92648 ",2625 De Wy #D-; . Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 Jeb-063-33 Geib, Earl 025-063-35 Barbee, Diane L 04-UOl 669� Harbor Key Cir 04-001 2606 -C Del Way Igntington Beach, Ca 92648 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 ' o 0 I t j TRANSMITTAL FORM �oAt.of Co:�t� De"10PIperlr TO: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEAC1 + -DATE: OCTOBER 21, 1991 2000 MAIN STREET PROJECT REFERENCE: 89023 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 PARCEL MAP 89-322 ATTN: MIKE CONNOR TRANSMITTED VIA: MAIL X MESSENGER OTHER DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL BEING TRANSMITTED: NO.OF COPIES 1 MAILING LABELS-300 ' RADIUS OF PROJECT SITE FOR YOUR USE AS REQUESTED . COMMENTS: I I SINCERELY: PHIL MARTIN CC: b AFFIDAVIT ON PROPERTY 01-RIERSHIP LIST The attached list represents the. names and addresses of all property owners located within-?o�D feet. of the exterior boundaries of property r located at as obtained from the latest., 6 ,�4-:e.County Assesment rolls . (Signature.) r-citherine Mr_ DermotC (Print name) -- 5595 Paseo Joaquin Yorba Linda,Ca.9266P Street Address, City ZIP & Phone No. 714-970-6157 4 G/-7/ 7`�;.• -��-1 l'�,r•P -Z' E �f 4�.• ,3�r����- �•lL^s`p.k`��� '°{ , � A 7h..r -Y� rli., Elt tl�. � r t DA STREET — pLI�• �t 2 4 t a oju . •c•M 4'C'�� M' .i: h.29� ` j .I "f, •-•. - ------'`�•�.7 Y•.wwr -----+-_---- ��� 1 h e ��.'f�9 d Ms._ S NQ ntw r tease Bras » ENGLAND 12 •o EAST SIDE WLLA 31 O . BLK.29055, s a9 14 TRACT .� T. •� •� O r ' �• � •ice � ► n w • STREET MAWARE - _...- ti� N.ff• rwAM • ...ie..� ti "•�,: EAST•IS/DE{ :, _ ~,`..j_, , ' � ' � 0000 00 000© ; MN062 O 97-2 ts" At - �.. 7 0 &os ski .t .r -fi•l7. .r� d•r: 1.-..a.: � �7C � °�'� �� ��•.(_��i' '�-+i��"c'.3'... 1 _ .:+sl::�t_, _ ..,. � .��...1 ! \ 1 r•' � ;� 74 � .—®-7 •. EAST SIDE 1>�„`s;,;,-.�'s t e— � • �. �t � � O / •tot i w - O s M. 07. ::; ..• .:', MA TRACT ,. . i ASA= s>• AOO 3522ofii ;:• TREET S 2 /IK�IYfAY�T>�Yzpq '^s"='�� t TRACT y TRACT •} �. : 1 6 I oZ� �:', j ��• '� � IPNgECf ells-�9 � , I101-N1 P/OO.EC7 917-/6 1 w3. a 501424 ;„. e:.'..#�:;;?'t' 1 �,. cos i T ;r. I :.-saw • zo ;;. ' • grA 8t �f+1' NO. 12524 " TRA tr 2 1 BLK 2902 - - TRA �_I • CT �... �Y Lor s 4 I I t►Rovtes 9: La AG COMMON ES 1 �A PACAL/T !!J jl a TRACT ass-" MD./2027 wr PRO-err 957 �• Lori TRACT ti9�Ac I BLK 2901 i USAC TRACT '«• Y NO 16 s - ---------- MD. 12526 s _ /ABAANQ P E. R• R N/MI I Connie Brockway, City Clerk _ �•. City of Huntington Beach Office of the City ClerkPRESORT U.S.PG�STAGc�;� P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA92648 FIRST CLASS IV�Q�I NOV1491 Lam. \ �;•� v �\ 'VI f 'Fo E T E R"� 1 70157l + 24.So Cal 88 Assoc. f13; t� 2700 17th St. r�NTa,•�RJ; . 1.,�3� �1, li�ntington I3each,Ca. 2 >' II ; H `%CUNPUBq FO ` �3, �-r"4.,O 2-01 I.FFT NO FIC1C.tdT ADDRESS U,�gfv6 �Cc�' Ff�`i7 19.09 P� pQ 'f'fCfa1PTEU, UNI(PlOWN � rp 1 CpUNT�P�\� No suct! NUMBER �r LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING Connie Brockway,City Clerk .,...,.. .,..•. w....._....... �.....W._... /(cs i t;,y` 5' `y�^ _;-`� �.�_-.=�p> y City of Huntington Beach �` e\ C�� us.PdSTnGi. :Z- v Office of the City Clerk P IR E S O i° ., j i NOV 14 91 f .�. „" ti P.O. Box ,90 FIRST CLASS fol L � /� � y . Huntington Beach,CA 92648 [M E E R-' f 57 Yie-hting !long 8432 Satinwood Cir. •`.' t' Westminister,Ca.92683 25-111-53 p` `NCON POHIIFO �(A c 9�V `to/7 1909`P� �pQ NTV CPS\ LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING - I1:I: ,it dill::1::1:::II::tI::::ll:::tl::l::l:ll::i ,AN' Connie Brockway,City Clerk �y�RESORT �1�� � �� r�1L'.•:..��U.S.."bSll'uir.�� •,�'.. City of Huntington Beach z 9 -• -='I Office of the City Clerk J n �e 'r NOV 14 �u6 P.O. Box 190 FIRST CL ASS LASS M AI�L Huntington Beach,CA92648 q,,,�, ...� ��glIE ��_ � `1F8701;72 , . . ,Ceib ;, 7 C `n� 278 rC Can:'yon' Dr. U" CostaI'!°, a,�Ca.92627• C fINGT v i Q /I ISO cOVN TY CP j .4 LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach =ti aF• �,, 11.S.fL'SiAGF1�7y Office of the City Clerk pp�y{�4 CLASS �` x P.O. Box 190 IFQRJ ! ClASJ MAI `r NOV14 f Huntington Beach, CA 92648 eq�!F � ;�r 1 ��E E R iY .�1 R ,F'?ols,2 . 21,22. General Eiji. . . 403 Clay Ave.' ' to sintington Boach,Ca.9 t9 INGTp s�NOF� 25-061-32,33 � O � Q� =hCORPOR4IFo BF9 ��E�{rl, .. -", i/ ry R _ ;- - -_- , y RFC• �,aA'�lt � t 92//• Q <<�'cp�NTy HEARING LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach t�R US!�t� Office of the City Clerk t3 fi s �S ` -+ � � � ^ �r2 �I CLASS �p pp � NOY 14 y l � � I ;, . ; P.O. Box190 rIRST CLASS i "Aft C.... �! +nFr:a-� Huntington Beach,CA 92648 \A _l F,z.70157 2 - (j t R I ETVq 59. C. Wareh 50�0 cjJ' ti 04 Clay Ave.to / -� SC4,o f�f° Huntington Beach Ca. r 5-112-01 • INGTpy fy AF l F�r F�4UNTY Ca�� LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ON Connie Brockway,City Clerk PRESORT ?� F ti �.,. City of Huntington Beach i 9= V.rx l:j n r C, IV'�� Office of the City Clerk NOV 14 91 +I . �, " ,r Box FIRST CLASS MAIL ` � �,�-��-' '' r P.O. c_ 1 7 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 �^+- ��� 1F `l 57J 29.D.Kohn >s 2623 Delware St..W Iluntinuton Beach,Ca.92648 25-063-02 �T lNGTpy�F9 KUHNbP.A < < it V �-ON TY CP LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING Connie Brockway,City Clerk ,,.. -City of Huntington Beach 6 6T4 4 r �� �UsiAL'7` j Office of the City Clerk PRESORT T P.O. Box 190 r NOV 14 91 s �" '' Huntington Beach,CA92648 FIRST CLASS MAIL � �� \!�_'` 4 0 �1 F]USN 67. B.Bryan 19231 Uelware St. INGTOy� fo ` SrNLEf��./; 11int:inglon Beach,Ca.92G48 s Ns .a (ry1� o v Cj 4.17, 1909• \ !' cUUN T Y CPS. LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ������ ,I,I,II„ i�,il� ►�� ,►II Connie Brockway,City Clerk „ . .. ...:, City of Huntington Beach .y RJ F 'us. �s�nc�.:,•.�: - Office of the City Clerk E S U R 9rI�»'�~�: r <<•_:� P.O. Box 190 -. . - - o pv _QQ pp J - Huntington Beach,CA 92648CAL► y �1 i>t 1 j M E ;E aCA J 01572 937-191-05 Crew, Donald `Anthon 7552 Spring Dr• .#101 y �. unc��J01,14ar;aa �e Huntington Beach,,.-.CA 92648 ING JAW, unitnuw�r, _. � nddresse� .. °. OQ cUUN TY Ca` LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING Connie Brockway,City Clerk �.,.�•--.�..�.�,..�... ..�_.,._•.,„ Cityof Huntington Beach � f ON e r`�' s`�` �. Office of the City Clerk li pr( PRESORT Izi P.O. Box 190 y f NOV Ib 91 1 i Huntington Beach,CA 92648 o`j �o FIRST CLASS MAIL t\ � �+ / �� N.ETER o `b 937-16-389 �t 0I \�. N.Genebach 19412 Pompano Ln 1Iuntington Beach,Ca•92648 "l 0 =h(,OR PORR77o \ vo to Z 4 �DUNTY Ca LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ye� Connie Brockway,City Clerk _...,. ....,.:.......•:.........,...:,... ...,...:,:._.•..",.. ;. .... . City of Huntington Beach , T i �' eF �'U.S.ynsTncEi`.� �- Office of the City Clerk NOV 20 81 { ��l P.o.Box, FIRST CLAS'S MAIL �Huntington Beach,CA 92M cq i F •,.1 C M E;F R . ..�.......r.r.a..c., 4 I 1701572. • " 937-191-05 , Q11 ,�;, aburas� Crew, Donald `Anthony r. P�,edO'•�� t' 7552 Spring Dr. #101 ; - t'Ia suc1, 1�tiyaz+��t•1�P oy ��- Sor'uiil<«uwn� Huntington Beach;;:.CA_92648` TINGT : q�ioved h0� , Pddressee O� �MCOP YOR.I I,� ��7 .... •''r' �VJ` �UUN TY CPS. LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ��,���t44�k�1 �w��,��1��1��,4�►i �.r�r.,��..�.��wfn�rr+V.rw..�.. •irn.w. r.+n1. .� .r.. ..._... ......r.,F,[^"•...r.n.... ,. ✓ .�,�•' .... ..'•�a�1.w.•�f�' `.14 r� •` ��� Connie Brockway,City Clerk NGTOJV u.s.�os�ncE City of Huntington Beach s ,� ,.•,ti � _ Zl�•�'R Office of the CityClerk py PRESORT I FIRSTP NOV 1b 91 " `fx. �i i a P.O. Box 190 od -MAIL r nn if Huntington Beach,CA 92648 o`� �° CLASS A S� M A t L \ E.Ell 937-16-389 �l Ok �� N.Genebach 19412 Pompano Ln �� ll Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 ���NT I NGTpy \l� `O \*ORPoR41 dF9� 40 �UUNTY �P LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ;,I„t�ttt ltl,tl Iltitt�►ttltll .I t Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach p Office of the City Clerk `RESORT NOV 14 91 P.O. Box190 FIRST CLAS'S filAfL Huntington Beach,CA 92648 r u a E ;E -' a �..n..+...ss...rw..,. -�A� t� 15. J.Timpone rA 2614 Huntington S sF,°�,� ° Huntington Begt 2�� 0 FR 25--061-26 `+aF41 ��pNTINGtpy6 - �� � �\ s TIPtlia4 T11 N13 FT1.>I: ((• �pUNTY �'P LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING It 01' REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION December 2, 1991 Date Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrato 2,-PR D BY CITZ Prepared by: Michael Adams, Director of Community D `velo nt Subject: ZONE CHANGE 91-2 NEGATIVE DECLARATION 9 — At Aid, .�/.Z trr 1 iE--�'� ci 1 cLt'RK Consistent with Council Policy? Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception3�� Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE• Zone Change 91-2 is a request to change the zoning on approximately 2, 580 square feet of property presently zoned R2 (Medium Density Residential) to R3 (Medium High Density Residential) . The property is located approximately 280 feet south of Clay Avenue on the east side of Huntington Street. The Zone Change would allow two (2) new units to be constructed next to an existing thirteen (13) unit apartment building for a total of fifteen (15) units. RECOMMENDATION• Motion to: 1 . "Approve Negative Declaration 91-13" . 2 . "Approve Zone Change 91-2 with findings by Adopting Ordinance: No. 3126 Planning Commission Action on October 8, 1991: A motion was made by Kirkland, second by Shomaker to approve Zone Change 91-2, Negative Declaration 91-13, Use Permit No. 91-63 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 89-322 with findings and conditions as previously approved with all previous .findings to remain in effect, by the following vote: AYES: Richardson, Newman, Shomaker, Kirkland NOES: Dettloff, Bourguignon, Leipzig ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None No 5/85 ANALYSIS: Zone Change No. 91-2 is a request to change the zoning on a 20 foot by 130 foot portion of land from R2 zoning to R3 . The subject property is located approximately 280 feet south of Clay Avenue on the east side of Huntington Street . The subject property is owned by the Methodist church to the east and was at one time anticipated to be used for secondary pedestrian access to the church. Such access has not been found to be necessary however. The property has been left vacant since the apartments were constru.cted and has had a history of miscellaneous land use problems . At present, the subject property and 30 feet of the property to the north are unusable because they are under separate ownership and do not have the necessary area or frontage to accommodate separate development . The property to the north is currently zoned R3 and has an existing nonconforming thirteen (13) unit apartment project . The apartment is nonconforming in regard to parking (32 required, 13 existing) front and rear setbacks and locational requirements for open space. This parcel is proposed to be expanded to include the subject property. If approved, the property to be rezoned can be combined with an adjacent 30 foot by 130 foot unusable area of the adjacent parcel to the north which is currently zoned R3 and two (2) new apartments may be constructed. The area to the south of the subject property is zoned R1 ( low density residential) . Two (2) single family residences back up to the subject property. One has approximately 92 feet of common property line and the other has approximately 38 feet . The property to the west is Pacific Ranch. �y CHURCH PARCEL � - > v b) 1 ExIpT N4+ t✓o MPLI[JC '.J �R2 Pfi m u- ro nt Rr-mmu, woo PD(� Tp LI IST-4 P.acLL_ H v14Tlly-Tol� Sr. Ewsr ..w VROSED PDR110s Of' FxiaTiNa Pw^(-tL RCA -2- (1293d) The proposed project consists of four different entitlements; a Zone Change, a Use Permit, a Tentative Parcel Map and a Negative Declaration. The following is a description of each of the entitlements: Zone Change The applicant proposes to rezone the subject parcel from R2 to R3 and combine it with a 30 foot wide strip of vacant R3 land to the north which is an unused portion of the existing 19, 030 square foot apartment building parcel. So combined, the apartment parcel will be 21, 610 square feet in size and will have a 50 foot by 130 foot (6, 500 square foot) portion of developable property attached to it . This will allow two (2) additional apartment units to be constructed and added to the existing 13 unit apartment. If Zone Change 91-2 is not approved, only one (1) additional unit could be constructed under the existing zoning and an expanded parcel could be created with two different zone classifications . Use Permit The use permit request allows two (2) additional units on the subject parcel which will provide a reasonable transitional use from the bulkey apartment building to the single family homes . The new units will provide parking that meets current code requirements. No further action is necessary by the City Council for Use Permit 90-63 . Approval of the Zone Change and Negative Declaration will allow the Use Permit to remain valid. Tentative Parcel Map The proposed parcel map would expand an existing 19,030 square foot lot by 2, 580 square feet for a total of 21, 610 square feet. The existing 146. 51 foot lot frontage would be increased by 20 feet to 166. 51 feet. The proposed lot would, therefore, exceed the minimum 6, 000 square foot lot with 60 feet of frontage required by code. Negative Declaration The negative declaration was required to determine what, if any, adverse impacts might be created if the zone change were approved. No significant impacts were identified and no special mitigation is required. The City Council must act on the Negative Declaration prior to the Zone Change request. Planning Commission Action: The proposed project was originally approved by the Planning Commission on July 23, 1991. At the following meeting of August 6, 1991, however the Planning Commission voted to schedule the item for reconsideration on September 4, 1991. Reasons cited for reconsideration were concerns regarding the provision of parking for the adjacent 13 unit apartment and impacts to residents of the single RCA -3- (1293d) f�rpily homes in the area. At the meeting of September 4, 1991 the P anning Commission voted to continue the item for one (1) month in order to analyze other design options that would provide parking for the two (2) new units as well as surplus parking for the existing building. On October 8, 1991, the Planning Commission reapproved the original site plan after reviewing other design options that would provide two (2) to four (4) excess parking spaces. The other design options would require variances to side and rear setbacks, site coverage and open space. In all the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed application four (4) times. At the Public Hearings before the Planning Commission, area residents, particularly the Rl properties to the south, stated opposition to the additional units because of existing parking problems currently on Clay Avenue, Huntington Street and Cleveland Drive. In summary, if Zone Change 91-2 is approved two (2) new units will be constructed on the currently unusable property. These units will be added to an existing nonconforming thirteen (13) unit apartment building and the new units will be designed to meet all aspects of the code. If Zone Change No. 91-2 is not approved, only one additional unit could be constructed should the applicant wish to do so. FUNDING SOURCE: Not Applicable. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Motion to: "Approve Negative Declaration 91-13 and deny Zone Change 91-2 with findings . " ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Findings and Conditions of Approval 2 . Planning Commission Staff Report Dated July 16, 1991 3 . Planning Commission Staff Report Dated September 4, 1991 4 . Planning Commission Staff Report dated October 8, 1991 5 . Negative Declaration No. 91-13 6 . Site Plan, Floor Plans, and Building Elevations 7. Draft Ordinance No. 312E 8 . Letter from Phil Martin Dated April 10, 1991 9 . Letter from Mike Porto dated August 13, 1991 10 . Letter from Mike Porto dated September 23, 1991 11. Letters from area residents MTU:MA:MJC: lp RCA -4- (1293d) Huntington Beach Planning Commission P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 October 11 , 1991 Stevenson Porto & Pierce, Inc . 18195 McDurmott East , Ste . C Irvine, CA 92714 SUBJECT : RECONSIDERATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ' S APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO . 91-2/TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO . 89-322/ USE PERMIT NO . 90-63/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO . 91-13 (CONTINUED FROM THE SEPTEMBER 4 , 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING) REQUEST : Change zoning from R2 to R3 , expand an existing parcel by approximately 2 , 580 square feet and construct two ( 2) additional apartments . LOCATION : 2810 N . Huntington Street DATE OF APPROVAL : October 8 , 1991 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO . 89-322 : 1 . The proposed 2 , 580 square foot lot expansion for purposes of residential uses is in compliance wth the size and shape of property necessary for that type of development . The proposed parcel meets the minimum lot area and frontage requirements of Article 912 . 2 . The General Plan has set forth provisions for this type of land use as well as setting fourth objectives for implementation of this type of use . The proposed 0 . 5 acre R3 parcel is less than the minimum required by the General plan for residential parcels , therefore it is not required to meet the Medium Density Land Use Designation . 3 . The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time the land use designation for residential buildings was placed on the subject property . The proposed residential parcel is less than the minimum required for residential development and will result in two ( 2) additional units . Zone Change No . 91-. ;'.. Tentative Parcel Map Ao. 89-322/ . . Use Permit No . 90-63/ ~ Negative Declaration No . 91-13 Page Two 4 . The size , depth, frontage, street width and other design and improvement features of the proposed subdivision are proposed to be constructed in compliance with standards , plans and specifications on file with the City as well as in compliance with the State Map Act and supplemental City Subdivision Ordinance . FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - USE PERMIT NO . 90-63 : The establishment , maintenance and operation of two ( 2) additional apartments to an existing non-conforming apartment complex will not be detrimental to : a . The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity. The two ( 2 ) new units will meet all minimum standards of code . b . Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building . The two ( 2 ) new units will meet all minimum standards of code . 2 . The granting of Use Permit No . 90-63 will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach . The subject property is less than one acre in size . FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - ZONE CHANGE N0 , 91-2 : 1 . The proposed zone change from R2 to R3 does conform with the Land Use Element of the General Plan , by virtue of the fact that it is less than one ( 1) acre in size . I 2 . The proposed zone change from R2 to R3 is consistent with surrounding R3 land uses to the north . CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 89-322 : 1 . The tentative parcel map received by the Department of Community Development on September 28 , 1990 shall be the approve layout . 2 . A parcel map shall be filed with and approved by the Department of Public Works and recorded with the Orange County Recorder . 3 . Water supply shall be through the City of Huntington Beach ' s water system at the time said parcel is developed . 4 . Sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington Beach ' s sewage system at the time said parcel is developed . Zone Change No . 91 -., ( Tentative Parcel MaP. .�Jo. 89-322/ Use Permit No 90-63/ Negative Declaration No . 91-13 Page Three 5 . All utilities shall be installed underground at the time said parcel is developed . 6 . Development shall comply with all applicable City Ordinances . 7 . All vehicular access rights along Huntington Street shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach except at locations approved by the Planning Commission . CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - USE PERMIT NO . 90-63 : 1 . The site plan , floor plans and elevations received and dated September 25 , 1991 (Scheme 1) shall be the conceptually approved layout . 2 . Prior to submittal for building permits , the applicant/owner shall complete the following : a . Submit three copies of the site plan to the Planning Division for addressing purposes . b . Depict all utility apparatus , such as but not limited to backflow devices and Edison transformers , on the site plan . They shall be prohibited in the front and exterior yard setbacks unless properly screened by landscaping or other method as approved by the Community Development Director . c . Floor plans shall depict natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at the location of clothes dryers ; natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities , water heaters , and central heating units ; and low-volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets . d . Elevations shall depict colors and building materials proposed . e . All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened from any view . Said screening shall be architecturally compatible with the building in terms of materials and colors . If screening is not designed specifically into the building , a rooftop mechanical equipment plan must be submitted showing screening and must be approved . Zone Change No . 91- Tentative Parcel Mai No . 89-322/ Usd Permit No . 90-63/ , Negative Declaration No . 91-13 Page Four f . A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer . This analysis shall include on-site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading, soil corrosivity, fill properties , foundations , retaining walls , streets , and utilities . g . The site plan shall include (or reference page) all conditions of approval imposed on the project printed verbatim. 3 . Prior to issuance of building permits , the applicant/owner shall complete the following : a . Submit four ( 4 ) copies of the revised site plan, floor plans and elevations pursuant to Condition No . 1 for review and approval and inclusion in the entitlement file . b . A Landscape Construction Set must be submitted to the Departments of Community Development and Public Works and must be approved . The Landscape Construction Set shall include a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State Licensed Landscape Architect and which includes all proposed/existing plant materials ( location, type , size , quantity) , an irrigation plan, a grading plan, an approved site plan , and a copy of the entitlement conditions of approval . The landscape plans shall be in conformance with Section 9608 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code . The set must be approved by both departments prior to issuance of building permits . Any existing mature trees that must be removed shall be replaced at a 2 to 1 ratio with minimum 36-inch box trees , which shall be incorporated into the project ' s landscape plan . c . A grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and it must be approved (by issuance of a grading permit) . A plan for silt control for all water runoff from. the property during construction and initial operation of the project may be required if deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works . d . All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid . e . The final parcel map shall be accepted by the City Council , recorded with the Orange County Recorder and a copy filed with the Department of Community Development . Zone Change No . 91 Tentative Parcel. 89-322/ Use Permit No . 90-63/ Negative Declaration No . 91-13 Page Five 4 . The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code , Building Division, and Fire Department . 5 . All building spoils , such as unusable lumber , wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material , shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. 6 . Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be completed prior to final inspection/within twelve ( 12) months . 7 . During construction, the applicant shall : a . Use water trucks or sprinkler systems in all areas where vehicles travel to keep damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site ; b . wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day ; c . Use low sulfur fuel ( . 05% by weight) for construction equipment ; d . Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days ( first stage smog alerts) ; e . Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts . 8 . Construction shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7 : 00 AM to 8 : 00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays . 9 . The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke this use permit if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs . 10 . This use permit shall not become effective until Zone Change No . 91-2 has been approved by the City Council and in effect . 11 . This use permit shall become null and void unless exercised within two (2) years of the date of final approval , or such extension of time as may be granted by the Planning Commission pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date . 1 , Zone Change No . 91-2.-': Tentative Parcel Mat,:..JG 89-322/ (l' Use Permit No . 90-63/ .Negative Declaration No . 91-13 Page Six 12 . The developer shall be responsible for the payment of the Traffic Impact Fees at the time of final inspection . 13 . The applicant/property owner shall be responsible for paying the Park and Recreation Fees in effect at the time the final map is accepted by City Council or issuance by building permits , whichever occurs first . 14 . Further subdivisions of the property shall not .be permitted . I hereby certify that Zone -Change No . 91-2 , Tentative Parcel Map No . 89-322 , Use Permit No . 90-63 and Negative Declaration No . 91-13 were approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach on October 8 , 1991 upon the foregoing findings and conditions . This approval represents conceptual approval only; detailed plans must be submitted for review and the aforementioned conditions completed prior to final approval . Sincerely, Mike Adams , Secretary Planning Commission 7W44W/� / al Simmons Senior Planner ( 1072d-38 , 43) huntington beach department of community development sraf f REPORIE TO: Planning Commission FROM: Community Development DATE: July 16, 1991 SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE NO. 91-2/TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 89-322/ USE PERMIT NO. 90-63/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-13 APPLICANT: Stevenson Porto & Pierce, Inc . DATE ACCEPTED: 18195 McDurmott East, Ste . C June 21, 1991 Irvine, CA. 92714 MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE : PROPERTY First United Methodist Church December 21, 1991 OWNER: 2721 Delaware Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ZONE: R2-R3 (Medium Density Residential/Medium-High REOUEST: Change zoning from R2 to Density Residential) R3 , expand an existing parcel by approximately GENERAL PLAN: Medium 2 , 580 square feet and Density Residential construct two (2) additional apartments-. EXISTING USE: Apartments and Vacant Land LOCATION: 2810 N. Huntington Street ACREAGE: 0 . 5 acres (21, 631 . 3 sf)- 1 . 0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Approve Negative Declaration No . 91-13 and Zone Change No . 91-2, Tentative Parcel Map No. 89-322 and Use Permit No. 90-63 with findings and suggested conditions of approval . 2 . 0 GENERAL INFORMATION: Zone Change No. 91-2, Tentative Parcel Map No. 89-322 , Use Permit No . 90-63 and Negative Declaration_ No . 91-13 is a request for a zone change from R2 (Medium Density Residential} to R3 (Medium-High Density Residential) on a remnant 2, 580 square foot parcel . If approved, the 2, 580 square foot subject parcel will be combined with an existing 19 , 030 square foot R3 parcel to allow the addition of two (2) apartment units to an existing 13 unit apartment complex. 'B AnkWomm now IF ff A-f M-23C i 3 0 SURROUNDING LAND USE ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS: Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION : Medium Density Residential ZONE: R2-R3 (Medium Density Residential- Medium-High Residential) LAND USE: Apartments and Vacant Land North of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential ZONE: R3 (Medium-High Residential) LAND USE: Apartments East of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION : Medium Density Residential ZONE: R2 (Medium Density Residential) LAND USE: Church South of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION : Medium Density Residential ZONE: R1 (Single Family Residential) LAND USE: Single Family Residences West of Subiect Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential ZONE: R2-0-CD (Medium Density Residential-oil Production-Commercial Development) LAND USE: Condominiums (Pacific Ranch) 4 . 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Community Development advertised draft Negative Declaration No. 91-13 for twenty-one (21) days , and one letter was received from the Huntington Beach Environmental Board . The letter as well as staff response are included as attachments . The staff, in its initial study of the project, has recommended that a negative declaration be issued. Prior to any action on Zone Change No . 91-2., Tentative Parcel Map No . 89-322 and Use Permit No . 9063 , it is, necessary for the Planning Commission to review and act on Negative Declaration No. 91-13 . 5 . 0 COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable. 6 . 0 REDEVELOPMENT STATUS : Not applicable. 7 . 0 SPECIFIC PLAN: Not applicable. 8 . 0 SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE: Not applicable . Staff Report - 7/23/91 -2- (0248d) 9 . 0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS : The applicant proposes to add two (2) additional detached apartment units to an existing non-conforming 13 unit apartment complex by expanding the existing parcel and changing the zoning from R2 to R3 on the portion to be added . Zone Change The subject property is a remnant parcel of land approximately 20 feet in width by 130 feet in length for a total of 2 , 580 square feet . It is located on the east side of Huntington Street between an existing R3 apartment project to the north and an existing single family subdivision to the south . The property is owned by the church to the east and was at one time anticipated to be used for ' additional pedestrian access to the church . Such access has not been found to be necessary, however . S GHURGH PARCEL LO lJ nl Etc I ST NG (moo M PLTiJG 1.,Y �RZ F►0.C(} ro Lc Rr_Mr4%S WqD ADDED TD ulSTi p H U14TIt-A1ON ST. � iyTluCi VKVSED Po R7low 0► V_X.inTIN� P�-Rc-" The applicant proposes to rezone the subject parcel from R2 to R3. and combine it with a 30 foot wide strip of vacant R3 land to the north which is an unused portion of the existing 19 , 030 square foot apartment building parcel . So combined, the apartment parcel will be 21, 610 square feet in size and will have a 50 foot by 130 foot' (6 , 500 square foot) portion of devel-opable property attached to it . This will allow two (2) additional apartment units to be constructed and added to the existing 13 unit apartment . Staff Report - 7/23/91 -3- (0248d) Section Issue Required Existing 9602 . 3 Parking 3-3 bdrm.x 2 . 5= 7 . 5 8-2 bdrm.x 2 =16 2-1 bdrm = 2 guest = 6 . 5 Total 32 13* *Does not conform to current code. **Open space does not comply with current code because the common area is within ten ( 10) feet of a wall that contains an opening and some units do not have private open space . The two (2) proposed units will be constructed to the south of the existing apartment building . The new units are designed as separate, freestanding units in order to provide a transitional area from the apartment complex to the north to the single family residences to ;the south. Both of the new units will take access from a single driveway. The following zoning conformance matrix analyzes the existing complex plus the two units . Items marked with an asterisk ( *-) show data for the new units only. The other items necessarily incl'bde the entire apartment complex. Section Issue Required Proposed 9120 . 2 Parcel Size 6 , 000 sf min. 21, 610 sf 60 ft . frontage 166 . 5 ft . 9120 . 3 Maximum Density 15 max. 15 9120 .4 Max. Height 30 ft . 23 ft . * 9120 . 5 Max. Site Coverage 10 , 795 . 5 10, 863** 9120 . 6 Front Setback 20 ft . avg . 23 ft . avg . * 15 ft . min. 15 ft . min 9120 . 7 Side Setback 10 ft . 10 ft . * Garage G ft . 5- ft . * 9120 . 8 Rear Setback 10 ft . 10 ft . 9120 . 9 Open Space 3 , 380 sf 4 , 469 sf 9602 . 3 Parking 2-3 bdrm.x 2 . 5=5 2-guest x . 5=1 Total 6 . 6* *Data for the new units only. **The applicant has agreed to revise the plans to comply with code . Staff Report - 7/23/91 -5- (0248d) As indicated above, the proposed two (2) apartment units will comply with all aspects of the current zoning code. The applicant has agreed to reduce site coverage to the code required maximum of 10, 795 square feet . Staff ' s other recommended change regards the applicant ' s proposal to construct Unit B with a side setback of five (5) feet for the garage with a second story setback of ten (10) feet for the living area to meet code. Staff recommends that the placement of Unit B be revised to have the garage entered at a 90 degree angle similar to the way the garage is entered for Unit A. By reversing the floor plan in this way a ten (10) foot side setback may be provided for the entire structure. The guest parking spaces would then be separated, one ( 1) between the buildings and one (1) along the south property line . The proposed change would have no impact on open space and would provide greater compatibility with the adjacent single family dwellings . On July 15 , 1991 , the Planning Division received a petition from property owners and residents in the area opposing the applicant ' s request . The following is a list of nine reasons why they feel that approval of this request would be inappropriate . Each item is followed by a staff response : t 1 . This property is presently non-conforming for open space requirements , private and common. Response: The existing, 13 unit apartment complex is non-conforming in regards to open space in that the common open space area is located within ten (10) feet of a wall with a door or window and within five (5) feet of any other wall . In addition, some of the units have no private open space . The existing structure is not proposed to be expanded or enlarged. The two (2) proposed units meet minimum open space requirements. 2 . This property is presently non-conforming for setbacks. Response: The existing structure has non-conforming front and rear setbacks and is not proposed to be altered or enlarged as part of this proposal . The two (2) proposed units will meet a ten (10) foot minimum side yard setback as. recommended by staff . 3 . The applicant is requesting another driveway encroachment, thus. adding to the ingress/egress problems which presently and for many years now, are what we consider inadequate . Response: The proposed drive aisle will meet all standards of code. 4 . We do not feel the proposed zone change follows the City General Land Use Plan adopted for our City. Staff Report - 7/23/91 -6- (0248d) Response : The General Plan Land Use Designation for this area is Medium Density Residential . Although the proposed R3 zoning is not compatible with this designation, the General Plan does not require residential parcels of less than one (1) acre to be compatible with the general plan. 5 . Most of us have lived in this area for a period of not less than five years and have experienced such problems as large parties , trash, and inadequate parking . We know that the City police records would back us up on these allegations . Response : A survey of the area has revealed a large number of cars parked along Huntington Street, Cleveland Drive and Clay Avenue. The proposed driveway would result in one possibly two on-street parking spaces being eliminated, however, the two proposed units will- have ample parking to meet code . 6 . We do not feel that the addition of additional apartments in this location, with close proximity to existing single family and low density developments , is in the best interest of adjoining residences . Response : The proposed new units will have a side' setback of ten (10) feet . This is equivalent to the minimum rear setback for a- single family residence which could be two (2) stories . A standard side setback for a two story single family residence would be five (5) feet , therefore, the proposed units would provide setbacks equal to or greater than would a standard R1 house in the same location. 7 . We have viewed the proposed layout and feel that the possibility of a future lot split , dividing the one parcel, is also a possibility. Response: The proposed parcel map consolidates the existing R3 portion with the existing R2 portion. A subdivision of the proposed parcel would make the existing complex exceed the permitted density and the 50 foot lot frontage would be inadequate for a residential parcel . A condition prohibiting any subdivision of the proposed lot could be imposed. 8 . We believe that the vacant lot was designed as part of the required open space for the now existing 13 units a-nd is not presently, or in- the past, being. maintained properly; therefore, adding more units is just going to compound the existing problem. Response: Plans for the original building could not be located. It cannot be concluded that this is required open s.pa-ce . The existiang building appears to be identical to the three (3) apartment buildings to the north. None of the other buildings have a similar area, therefore, it is unlikely that this was part of the open space area required at the time the building was- constructed. Staff Report - 7/23/91 -7- (0248d) 9 . We have submitted some pictures showing the normal parking problem on and off this site . Response : A survey of the area has revealed a large number of cars parked along Huntington Street, Cleveland Drive and Clay Avenue. The proposed driveway would result in one possibly two on-street parking spaces being eliminated, however, the two proposed units will have ample parking to meet code 10 . 0 RECOMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Zone Change No . 91-2, Tentative Parcel Map No . 89-322, Use Permit No . 90-63 and Negative Declaration No. 91-13 with the following findings and suggested conditions of approval : FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL — TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 89-322 : 1 . The proposed 2, 580 square foot lot expansion for purposes of residential uses is in compliance wth the size and shape of property necessary for that type of development . The proposed parcel meets the minimum lot area and frontage requirements of Article 912 . 2 . The General Plan has set forth provisions for this type of land use as well as setting fourth objectives for implementation of this type of use. The proposed 0 . 5 acre R3 parcel is less than the minimum required by the General plan for residential parcels , therefore it is not required to meet the Medium Density Land Use Designation. 3 . The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time the land use designation for residential buildings was placed on the subject property. The proposed residential parcel is less than the minimum required for residential development and will result in two (2) additional units . 4 . The size, depth, frontage, street width and other design and improvement features of the proposed subdivision are proposed to be constructed in compliance with standards, plans and specifications on file with the City as well as in compliance ' with the State Map Act and supplemental City Subdivision Ordinance. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - USE PERMIT NO. 90-63 : The establishment, maintenance and operation of two (2) additional apartments to an existing non-conforming apartment complex will not be detrimental to: a . The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity. The two (2) new units will meet all minimum standards of code . Staff Report - 7/23/91 -8- (0248d) b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building . The two (2) new units will meet all minimum standards of code. 2 . The granting of Use Permit No . 90-63 will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. The subject property is less than one acre in size . FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - ZONE CHANGE NO. 91-2 : 1 . The proposed zone change from R2 to R3 does conform with the Land Use Element of the General Plan, by virtue of the fact that it is less than one (1) acre in size. 2 . The proposed zone change from R2 to R3 is consistent with surrounding R3 land uses to the north. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 89-322 : 1 . The tentative parcel map received by the Department of Community Development on September 28, 1990 shall be the approve layout . 2 . A parcel map shall be filed with and approved by the Department of Public Works and recorded with the Orange County Recorder . 3 . Water supply shall be through the City of Huntington Beach' s water system at the time said parcel is developed. 4 . Sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington Beach ' s sewage system at the time said parcel is developed. 5 . All utilities shall be installed underground at the time said parcel is developed. 6 . Development shall comply with all applicable City Ordinances . - 7 . All vehicular access rights along. Huntington Street shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach except at locations' approved by the Planning Commission. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - USE PERMIT NO. 90-63 : 1. The site plan, floor plans and elevations received and dated December 18, 1991 shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following modifications : a . Unit B shall be reversed to provide a ten (10) foot minimum setback on the south and the garage shall be entered at a 90 degree angle from the drive aisle. 2 . Prior to submittal for building permits, the applicant/owner shall complete the following : Staff Report - 7/23/91 -9- (0248d) a . Submit three copies of the site plan to the Planning Division for addressing purposes . b. Depict all utility apparatus , such as but not limited to backflow devices and Edison transformers , on the site plan. They shall be prohibited in the front and exterior yard setbacks unless properly screened by landscaping or other method as approved by the Community Development Director . c . Floor plans shall depict natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at the location of clothes dryers; natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking' facilities , water heaters, and central heating units ; and low-volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets . d. Elevations shall' depict colors and building materials proposed . e. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened from any view. Said screening shall be architecturally compatible with the building in terms of materials and colors . If screening is not designed specifically into thb building, a rooftop mechanical equipment plan must be submitted showing screening and must be approved. f . A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer . This analysis shall include on-site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed- recommendations regarding grading, so-il corrosivity, fill properties, foundations, retaining walls , streets, and utilities . g . The site plan shall include (or reference page) all conditions of approval imposed on the project printed verbatim. 3 . Prior to issuance of building. permits, the applicant/owner shall complete the following: a. Submit four (4) copies of the revised site plan, floor plans and elevations pursuant to Condition No. 1 for review and approval and inclusion in the entitlement file . Staff Report - 7/23/91 -10- (0248d) i b. A Landscape Construction Set must be submitted to the Departments of Community Development and Public Works and must be approved . The Landscape Construction Set shall include a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State Licensed Landscape Architect and which includes all proposed/existing plant materials ( location, type, size, quantity) , an irrigation plan, a grading plan, an approved site plan, and a copy of the entitlement conditions of approval . The landscape plans shall be in conformance with Section 9608 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code . The set must be approved by both departments prior to issuance of building permits . Any existing mature trees that must be removed shall be. replaced at a 2 to 1 ratio with minimum 36-inch box trees , which shall be incorporated into the project ' s landscape plan. c . A grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and it must be approved (by issuance of a grading permit) . A plan for silt control for all water- runoff from the property during construction and initial operation of the project may be required if deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works . d. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid . e. The final parcel map shall be accepted by the City Council, recorded with the Orange County Recorder and . a copy filed with the Department of Community Development . 4 . The Public Works Department requirements are as follows : 5 . The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department . 6 . All building spoils_, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and . other surplus or unusable material , shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. 7 . Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be completed prior to final inspection/within twelve (12) months . 8 . During construction, the applicant shall : a. Use water trucks' or sprinkler systems in all areas where vehicles travel to keep damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site; b. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day; c. Use low sulfur fuel ( . 05% by weight) for construction equipment; Staff Report - 7/23/91 -11- (0248d) i d. Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days (first stage smog alerts) ; e. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts . 9 . Construction shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7 : 00 AM to 8 : 00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays . 10 . The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke this use permit if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs . 11. This use permit shall not become effective until Zone Change No . 91-2 has been approved by the City Council and in effect . 12 . This use permit shall become null and void unless exercised within two (2) years of the date of final approval, or such extension of time as may be granted by the Planning. Commission pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date . 13 . Should a Traffic Impact Fee be adopted by the City Council, the applicant/property owner shall be responsible for paying such fee prior to issuance of a Certificate_ of Occupancy and/or final building permit approval . 14 . The applicant/property owner shall be responsible for paying the Park and Recreation Fees in effect at the time the final map is accepted by City Council or issuance by building permits , whichever occurs first . 15 . The developer will be responsible for the payment of any additional fees adopted in the "upcoming" Water Division Financial Master Plan. 16 . Further subdivisions of the property shall not be permitted. 11 . 0 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The Planning Commission may deny Zone Change No. 91-2, Tentative Parcel Map No . 89-322 and Use Permit No. 90-63 with findings . ATTACHMENTS: 1. Area map 2 . Narrative 3 . Negative Declaration No . 91-13 4 . Site plans , elevations , and floor plans dated December 18, 1990 5 . Letter from the Huntington Beach Environmental Board dated June 18, 1991 6 . Staff ' s response to the Environmental Board letter dated July 11, 1991 7 . Draft Ordinance for Zone Change No . 91-2 8 . Letter from Harry Monk, et al, dated July 10 , 1991 HS:MC:kjl Staff Report - 7/23/91 -12- (0248d) a ' huntington beach department of community development STAf f REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Community Development DATE: September 4, 1991 SUBJECT: RECONSIDERATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. 91-2/TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 89-322/ ; USE PERMIT NO. 90-63/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-13 APPLICANT: Stevenson Porto & Pierce, Inc. DATE ACCEPTED: 18195 McDurmott East, Ste. C June 21, 1991 Irvine, CA 92714 MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE: PROPERTY First United Methodist Church December 21, 1991 .OWNER: 2721 Delaware Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ZONE: R2-R3 (Medium Density Residential/Medium-High REOUEST: Change zoning from R2 to Density Residential) R3 , expand an existing parcel by approximately GENERAL PLAN: Medium 2, 58.0 square feet and Density Residential construct two (2) additional apartments. EXISTING USE: Apartments and Vacant Land LOCATION: 2810 N. Huntington Street ACREAGE: 0. 5 acres (21, 631.3 sf) 1. 0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Motion to:. "Approve Zone Change No. 91-2, Tentative Parcel Map No. 89-322 and Use Permit No. 90-63 with all previous findings and conditions of approval to remain in effect. " 2. 0 GENERAL INFORMATION: Zone Change No. 91-2, Tentative Parcel Map No. 89-322, and Use Permit No. 90-63 is a request for a zone change from R2- (Medium Density Residential) to R3 (Medium-High Density Residential) on a remnant 2, 580 square foot parcel . If approved, the 2,580 square foot subject parcel will be combined with an existing 19, 030 square foot R3 parcel to allow the addition of two (2) apartment units to an existing. 13 unit apartment complex. The Planning Commission approved the project on July 23, 1991. At the following meeting of August 6,. 1991, however, the Commission voted to schedule the item for reconsideration on September 4, 1991. Reasons cited for reconsideration were concerns regarding the provision of parking for the adjacent 13 un' tment complex. A-FM-23C �-3 3 . 0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: The subject applications were originally reviewed by the Planning Commission on July 23 , 1991. The staff report dated July 16, 1991 which is attached contains the original analysis of the project . During the public hearing, a number of issues were discussed including the non-conforming conditions of the existing apartment building, parking, and compatibility problems with the property as it currently exists . After lengthly discussions, the Planning Commission made the following motions and actions : A MOTION WAS MADE BY KIRKLAND, SECOND BY NEWMAN, TO APPROVE NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-13 , BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Newman, Kirkland, Shomaker, Leipzig, Richardson, Bourguignon NOES: Dettloff ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION TO APPROVE PASSED A MOTION WAS MADE BY LEIPZIG, SECOND BY DETTLOFF, TO DENY ZONE CHANGE NO. 91-2/TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 89-322/USE PERMIT NO. 90-63, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Dettloff, Leipzig, Richardson NOES: Newman, Shomaker, Kirkland, Bourguignon ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION TO DENY FAILED A MOTION WAS MADE BY NEWMAN, SECOND BY BOURGUIGNON, TO APPROVE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 89-322, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Newman, Kirkland, Shomaker, Richardson, Bourguignon NOES: Dettloff, Leipzig ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION TO APPROVE PASSED A MOTION WAS MADE BY KIRKLAND, SECOND BY SHOMAKER, TO APPROVE USE PERMIT NO. 90-63 , BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Newman, Kirkland, Shomaker, Richardson, Bourguignon NOES: Dettloff, Leipzig ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION TO APPROVE PASSED Staff Report - 9/4/91 -2- (0585d) 1 f� A MOTION WAS MADE BY KIRKLAND, SECOND BY SHOMAKER, TO APPROVE ZONE CHANGE NO. 91-2, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Newman, Kirkland, Shomaker, Richardson, Bourguignon NOES: Dettloff, Leipzig ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION TO APPROVE PASSED Subsequent to the Planning Commission' s action, Commissioner Newman reanalyzed the project and requested that the Planning Commission reconsider their previous action in order to re-review the proposal based upon planning issues rather than economic consideration. The Planning Commission agreed to place the item for reconsideration on the September 4 , 1991 Planning Commission Agenda. New Letter from Applicant On August 13 , 1991, the Planning Division received a letter from Stevenson, Porto, & Pierce, Inc. , the applicant, regarding the history of the lot and application, the proposed project, Planning Commission action and concerns regarding the proposed reconsideration. In their letter, the applicants state that they have analyzed three alternatives in order to provide additional parking on the site: (1) reducing_ the building footprints to provide additional area which could possibly be used for parking; (2) reducing the bedroom' count to reduce required parking and (3) eliminating one of the proposed units to reduce parking demand and provide additional parking. The first option - reducing the building footprints was determined to be infeasible and impractical . It is infeasible because the rooms on the first floor are already very small; further reductions would render these rooms unusable. It is impractical because the - reduction in footprint would not allow for any additional parking . , The second alternative - reducing the bedroom count - would have a minimal affect. The proposed project has two - three (3) bedroom units, with a total of seven (7) required parking spaces . If the units were to be reduced to two - two (2) bedroom units, the total parking requirements would be six (6) spaces, therefore allowing for only one (1) additional guest parking space. The third alternative - eliminating one unit would provide for the, most additional guest parking spaces. Seven (7) spaces would be provided. The applicant argues that this alternative is not feasible for the following reasons; there is not direct access between the existing building and the new parking, it would only be a net increase of three spaces and the remaining unit would be unattractively located at the end of a parking lot . Lastly, they conclude that the economic return on only one unit would not justify the project . Staff Report - 9/4/91 -3- - (0585d) ` s In staff ' s analysis, the issue of direct access to and from the parking lot to the existing units could be resolved by eliminating the back (east) unit instead of the front unit . In so doing a connection could be made by utilizing the presently unused five (5) foot rear setback as an accessway directly into the courtyard area . The development would then allow for a more compatible appearance with the surrounding area because of the parking lot at the rear of the parcel . In functional terms, however, a parking lot on the back of the property may be detrimental to the single family units to the south due to increased traffic and related noise on the site. Apart from deleting one unit, an alternative which is not explored in the letter would be to continue to allow two units, but require the rear unit to be entirely or mostly on the second level with new parking for the existing units provided underneath. This would allow the density the applicant needs to make the project economically viable and it would provide additional parking spaces for the existing units . The rear setback area would again be used for access to the courtyard. This unit would be bulkier, however, is less compatible with the adjacent uses . It is important to note that the last two alternatives would result in a net increase in parking but would still not come close to bringing the existing parking deficit into compliance. In addition, the two new units, as proposed, provide open space in excess of the minimum required by code. The two- alternatives would significantly reduce the open space provided. They would also. increase vehicle noise on the site and reduce compatibility with the adjacent single family homes . In the event the proposed applications are not approved, the property may remain vacant and unused, or the portion currently owned by the church may be sold and added to the single family residences to the south. This would require a tentative parcel map and a zone change to be processed. If the property were added to the single family lots to the south, street improvements on the remnant to the west would still not be made. Also, only one single family owner may choose to acquire the property; thereby, continuing to leave a portion of the property a-s a "dead zone" subject to litter and vagrancy. Lastly, it is conceivable that if the property were acquired by the adjacent single family lots, those owners may pursue additional units either through a zone change or a "granny unit" project. In any event, no. additional parking would still be made available to the existing 13-unit apartment . Conclusion: In summary, staff maintains that the current proposal for two three-bedroom units constitutes the most reasonable use for the property. . Such units will provide an appropriate transitional use between the 13-unit apartment and the single family homes. The provision of additional parking for the 13-unit apartment site appears to be infeasible under any scenario, and may be incompatible with the adjacent single family homes . Staff Report - 9/4/91 -4- (0585d) I 1 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission uphold their previous approval of Zone Change No. 91-2, Tentative Parcel Map No. 89-322 and Use Permit No. 90-63 with all previous findings and conditions and forward the Zone Change to the City Council with a positive recommendation. Attachments: 1. Letter from Mike Porto dated August 13, 1991 2 . Planning Commission Staff Report dated July 16, 1991 HS:MC:jr MC Staff Report - 9/4/91 -5- (0585d) I ' huntington beach department of community development sTAf f REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Community Development DATE: October 8, 1991 SUBJECT: RECONSIDERATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. 91-2/TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 89-322/ ,USE PERMIT NO. 90-63/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-13 (CONTINUED FROM THE SEPTEMBER 4, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING) APPLICANT: Stevenson Porto & Pierce, Inc. DATE ACCEPTED: 18195 McDurmott East, Ste. C June 21, 1991 Irvine, CA 92714 MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE: PROPERTY First United Methodist Church December 21, 1991 OWNER: 2721 Delaware Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ZONE:. R2-R3 (Medium Density Residential/Medium-High REOUEST: Change zoning from R2 to Density Residential) R3, expand an existing parcel by approximately GENERAL PLAN: Medium 2, 580 square feet and Density Residential construct two (2) additional apartments. EXISTING USE: Apartments- and Vacant Land LOCATION: 281a N. Huntington Street ACREAGE: 0. 5 acres (21, 631.3 sf) 1. 0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Motion to: "Approve. one Change No. 91-2, Tentative Parcel Map No;. 89-322 and Use Permit No. 90-63 as previously approved with all previous findings and conditions of approval to remain in effect . " 2 . 0 GENERAL INFORMATION: Zone Change No. 91-2, Tentative . Parcel Map No. 89-322, and Use Permit No. 90-63 is a request for a zone change from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to R3 (Medium-High Density Residential) on a remnant ' 2, 580 square foot parcel . If approved, the 2, 580 square foot subject parcel will be combined with an existing 19, 030 square foot R3 parcel to allow the addition of two (2) apartment units to an existing thirteen (13) unit apartment complex. Afft AvTTAc-taM�fT �. 4 A-FM-23C The Planning Commission approved the project on July 23, 1991. At the following meeting of August 6 , 1991, however, the Commission voted to schedule the item for reconsideration on September 4 , 1991 . Reasons cited for reconsideration were concerns regarding the provision of parking for the adjacent 13 unit apartment complex. At their meeting of September 4 , 1991, the Planning Commission requested that the applicant attempt to redesign the two (2) proposed units in order to provide additional off-street parking to reduce the heavily impacted on-street parking in the area. The applicant has returned with three (3) design schemes to be analyzed by the Planning Commission: Scheme 1 Scheme 1 is the site plan that was originally approved by the Planning Commission. This alternative provides no excess parking from that required for the two (2) new units, however it meets all aspects of code and exceeds the minimum open space requirements . In addition, Scheme 1 would have the least impact upon the R1 properties to the south because it would have the least traffic and provides a greater minimum setback from the R1 properties . The building designs are also the most compatible with the R1 properties because of their single family residential design. Scheme 2 Scheme 2 has the same Unit A (front unit) design as Scheme 1 with Unit B designed as a second story unit over a two (2) car garage and a four (4) car carport . The design provides for two (2) additional off street parking spaces, however, the design would require a conditional exception (variance) for four (4) different code requirements : 1. Site coverage (exceeds maximum by 561 square feet) . 2. Rearyard setback (5 feet shown, 10 feet required) . 3 . Sideyard setback (5 feet shown, 10 feet required) . 4 . Open space (65 square foot deficit) . The site plan would impact the R1 properties to the south more than Scheme 1 because of additional on-site traffic, the reduced setback and the second story deck. Scheme 3 Scheme 3 shows both units above the ground level parking . This design provides four (4) additional off-street parking spaces over what is required by the two (2) new units, however, it shows all of the same variance requirements as Scheme 2 : 1. Site Coverage (exceeds by 846 square feet) . Staff Report - 10/8/91 -2- (0966d) : a 2 . Rearyard setback (10 feet required, 5 feet shown) . 3 . Sideyard setback (10 feet required, 5 feet shown) . 4 . Open space (99 square foot deficit) . The design would have the most impact upon adjacent single family residences because it would have the most on-site traffic and because of the reduced setback abutting the R1 properties . In addition, the design would be the least compatible with the R1 units because of the bulk of the buildings and the carports would be visible from the street . In light of the increased impacts that Schemes 2 and 3 would have on the adjacent single family residences, staff feels that Scheme 1 is the most compatible with the neighborhood. Due to the timing of the receipt of the revised plans, staff was not able to advertise the various conditional exceptions for either Scheme 2 or Scheme 3 above. If the Planning Commission decides to pursue approval of either Scheme 2 or 3, they must continue the item to the next meeting so that staff may properly advertise the required variances . In fairness to the applicant, however, the Planning Commission should at least take straw votes for approval or denial of Schemes 2 or 3, if a continuance for advertising is contemplated. If a straw vote indicates denial, then the applicant should simply be given a denial on the project . 3 . 0 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission uphold their previous approval of Zone Change No. 91-2, Tentative Parcel Map No. 89-322 and Use Permit No. 90-63 with all previous findings and conditions and forward the Zone Change to the City Council with a positive recommendation. 4 . 0 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The Planning Commission may deny Zone Change No. 91-2, Tentative Parcel Map no. 89-322 and Use Permit No. 90-63 with findings . Attachments: 1. Revised site plans, floor plans and elevations 2 . Letter from Mike Porto dated September 23, 1991 3 . Planning Commission- Staff Report dated September 4, 1991 4 . Letter from Mike Porto dated August 13, 1991 5. Planning Commission Staff Report dated July 16, 1991 HS1jl Staff Report - 10/8/91 -3- (0966d) 44 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH Mike Connor Jul' sugi To Assistant Planner From pleing Aide ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT May 15, 1991 Subject FORM NO. 91-13 Date Applicant: Stevenson, Porto & Pierce, Inc. Request: A zone change on approximately 2,600 net square feet of property from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to R3 (Medium-High Density Residential) to bring the property into conformance with the R3 zoning on the property immediately to the north. The applicant is also requesting processing of a tentative parcel map to allow the 2,600 square foot strip of land to be combined with the existing 18,995 square foot R3 lot to the north to create a 21,595 square foot R3 lot for the purpose of developing 2 additional detached residential units to the existing 13 unit medium-high density residential apartment complex. Background Staff has reviewed the environmental assessment form noted above and has determined that a negative declaration may be filed for the project. In view of this, a draft negative declaration was prepared and was published in the Daily Pilot for a thirty (30) day public review period commencing Monday, May 20, 1991 and ending Thursday, June 20, 1991. If any comments regarding the draft negative declaration are received, you will be notified immediately. Recommendation The Environmental Assessment Committee recommends that the Planning Commission approve Negative Declaration No. 90-52 finding that the proposed project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment. JO:lp (9670d-3) LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Notice is hereby given by the Department of Community Development, Planning Division of the City of Huntington Beach that the following Draft Negative Declaration request has been prepared and will be submitted to the City of Huntington Beach Planning Commission for their consideration. The Draft Negative Declaration will be available for public review and comment for thirty (30) days commencing Monday, May 20, 1991. Draft Negative Declaration No. 91-13 in conjuntion with Zone Change 91-2, Tentative Parcel Map No. 89-322 and Use Permit No. 90-63 is a request to amend the Zoning on approximately 2,600 net square feet of property from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to R3 (Medium-High Density Residential) to bring the property into conformance with the R3 zoning on the property immediately to the north. The applicant is also requesting processing of a tentative parcel map to allow the 2,600 square foot strip of land to be combined with the existing 18,995 square foot R3 lot to the north to create a 21,595 square foot R3 lot for the purpose of developing 2 additional detached residential units to the existing 13 unit medium-high density residential apartment complex. A copy of the request is on file with the Department of Community Development, City of' Huntington Beach, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. Any person wishing to comment on the request may do so in writing within twenty--one (21) days of this notice by providing written comments to the Department of Community Development, Planning Division, P.O. Box 190, Huntington Beach, CA 92648. (9670d-2) F f ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 91-13 1 . Name of Proponent Stevenson Porto & Pierce, Inc. Address 18195 McDurmott East, Suite C Irvine, CA 92714 Phone Number (714) 660-8822 2. Date Checklist Submitted for Review May 15, 1991 3. Concurrent Entitlement(s) Zone Change No. 91-2. Tentative Parcel May 89-322 and Use Permit No. 90-63. 4. Project Location 2210 N. Huntington Street (East side of Huntington Street Between Clay Avenue and Cleveland Avenue) 5. Project Description A zone change on approximately 2,600 net square foot strip of property from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to R3 (Medium—High Density Residential) to bring the property into conformance with the R3 zoning on the property immediately to the north. The applicant is also requesting processing of a tentative Parcel map to allow the 2,600 square foot strip of land to be combined with the existing 18,995 square foot R3 lot to the north to create a 21 ,595 square foot R3 lot for the purpose of developing 2 additional detached residential units to the existing 13 unit medium—high density residential apartment complex. r ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of answers are included after each subsection.) Yes Maybe No 1 . Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or changes in geologic substructures? _ X b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? X Discussion: Some disruption, displacement, compaction and overcovering of soil is associated with development of the proposed project site. However, through implementation of standard conditions of approval which require submittal of a soils study and implementation of specfications contained therein, no significant impacts to earth conditions are anticipated to result from the proposed project. • l f? "' Yes Maybe No C. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X — Discussion: The project proposes approximately 25 cubic yards of cut and fill with a maximum slope ratio of 4:1 and a maximum height of 1 foot which may alter the topography of the site. However, this type of grading is not considered substantial; no significant impact is anticipated. d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? — X Discussion: The project site is primarily flat and does not contain any unique physical features. e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? — X — Discussion: The proposed project may result in short—term wind erosion impacts during the site preparation and construction phases. However, with implementation of standard conditions of approval requiring dust control measures, no significant impact is anticipated. f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or- the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? — X g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? X — Discussion: The project is not located in the vicinity of the Alquist—Priolo Special Hazard Zone or any other known fault hazard; however, the site is located in an area of potential expansive soils as identified in the City's 1974 Geotechnical Inputs report. Through implementation of standard conditions of approval which require submittal of soils reports and implementation of measures contained therein, no significant impacts are anticipated. 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? — X Discussion: Air emissions generated by construction and operation of two residential units are not considered substantial . No significant impact is anticipated. b. The creation of objectionable odors? X r - - Discussion: No objectionable odors will be generated by the project. C. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? _ X 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X Environmental Checklist —2— (9637d) Yes Maybe No b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? X Discussion: The project will result in overcovering of the existing vacant site with impervious surfaces and will reduce absorption and increase runoff from the site. However, the department of Public Works has indicated that proposed drainage for the site can be adequately accommodated by existing drainage systems. No significant impact is anticipated. C. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? _ _ X Discussion: The proposed project is not located in the vicinity of the floodplain. d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? _ _ X e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? _ _ X f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? _ X g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? _ X h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? _ X Discussion: Construction and operation of the proposed project will increase water usage by the vacant site. However, water usage by 2 residential units is not considered substantial . No significant reduction in water supplies is anticipated. i . Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? _ X Discussion: See 3c. 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? X b. Reduction of the numbers of any mature, unique, rare or endangered species of plants? X _ C. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? _ X d. Reduction in acreage of an agricultural crop? _ X Discussion (a—d): The site is currently covered by grasses and contains 5 mature Pine and Eucalyptus trees which may have to be removed or relocated to develop the proposed units. However, the project will be subject to stndard conditions of approval which require that mature trees be maintained if feasible or replaced at a 2:1 ratio. No significant impact is anticipated. 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? _ X Environmental Checklist —3— (9637d) Yes Maybe No b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? _ X C. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? _ _ X d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? _ X Discussion (a—d): The site is is primarily used for foot traffic from the adjacent church facility and does not appear to support any unique animal species. No significant impact is anticipated. 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? X _ Discussion: Short—term: The equipment associated with construction of the proposed project will generate short—term increases in noise during the site preparation and construction phases. However, impacts resulting from construction equipment can be reduced to a level of insignificance through implementation of standard conditions of approval , limiting the hours of construction activities and compliance with the Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance. Long—Term: Occupation of two residential units will increase noise generated by the presently vacant site, However, noises are anticipated to be similar to those associated with existing residences in the area. No significant incrases in noise levels are anticipated. b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? _ X Discussion: The proposed project is not located in the vicinity of any arterials or other major noise sources. No significant impact is anticipated. 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X Discussion: The proposed project will result in new light and glare in the project vicinity. However, the project area is predominantly developed and the light and glare contribution of the project is considered negligible. No significant impact is anticipated. 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X Discussion: The existing zoning would allow for development of one additional unit. The project proposes amending the zoning on a 2,600 square foot strip of property from R2 (Medium Density Residential , 15 units/acre) to R3 (Medium High Density Residential , 25 units/acre) to allow for development of two additional detached residential units on the site. The zone change on the strip of property is considered to be a cleanup of the zoning map which will bring the property into conformance with the property adjacent to the north of the subject site and is not considered to be substantial . No significant impacts are anticipated. 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? — _ X Discussion: The proposed project will increase the use of natural resources compared to usage generated by the existing vacant site. However, resource usage generated by 2 residential units is not considered substantial . No significant impact is anticipated. Environmental Checklist —4— (9637d) i • Yes Maybe NQ b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? _ X Discussion: See 9a. 10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to oil , pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? _ _ X b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? _ _ X 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? X Discussion: The proposed project will increase the density on 2,600 square feet and will allow for construction of 2 additional housing units; however the population impacts associated with 2 units is considered negligible. No significant impact is anticipated. 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? _ X 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? X Discussion: Transportation systems in the project vicinity are currently operating at adequate levels of service. The applicant's request will allow for development of two additional residences. Traffic generated by two additional residential units is not considered to be substantial . b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new off—site parking? _ _ X Discussion: Proposed development of the parcel to complies with parking requirements contained in article 960 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code which requires that a minimum 6 parking spaces be provided on—site. No significant impacts to parking are anticipated. C. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? _ X Discussion: Transportation impacts resulting from two residential units will be negligible. No significant impacts are anticipated. d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? _ _ X Discussion: The proposed parcels will access onto an existing residential street (Huntington Street). Alterations to circulation resulting from the parcel 's accessing onto Huntington Street are negligible. No significant impact is anticipated. e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? _ X Discussion: Minor increases in short—term traffic hazards may result during site preparation and construction phases due to the presence of construction vehicles in the project area. However, the .volume of construction traffic resulting from development of two residential units is negligible. No significant impact is anticipated. Environmental Checklist —5— (9637d) Yes Maybe No 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? - _ X b. Police protection? - _ X C. Schools? _ _ X d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X Discussion: The project site is currently unimproved and will require installation of sidewalk, curb and gutter which will be maintained by the City. However, these improvements are not considered substantial and will not require any additional manpower or facilities to serve the proposed project. f. Other governmental services? _ _ X Discussions (a—d,f): All public services are currently available for the site. Development of two residential units will not result in a need for any additional fire, police, school , park, public facilities or services. No significant impact is anticipated. 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? _ X Discussion: The proposed project will result in an increase in use of energy over that used by the currently vacant site. However, energy usage by two residential units is not considered to be substantial; no significant impacts are anticipated. b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing source of energy, or require the development of sources of energy? _ X Discussion: See 15a. 16. Utilities. •Will the proposal result< in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? _ _ X b. Communication systems? _ X C. Water? X d. Sewer or septic tanks? _ X e. Storm water drainage? X Environmental Checklist =6— (9637d) f ` Yes Maybe 'k f. Solid waste and disposal? _ _ X Discussion (a—f): All utilities are currently available in the project vicinity. Development of the two residential units may require installation of connections into existing utility systems; however, the project will not result in a need for any new systems or substantial alterations to existing systems to serve the site. 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? _ _ X b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? _ _ X 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? _ _ X Discussion: The site does not currently offer any view opportunities and is not anticipated to result in an aesthetically offensive site; no significant impact is anticipated. 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? _ _ X Discussion: The proposed project site will not impact any recreational opportunities. 20. Cultural Resources. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? _ _ X b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? _ _ X C. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? _ _ X d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? _ X Discussion (a—d): The proposed project site is not located in the vicinity of any known archaeological sites. 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, sub— stantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X Environmental Checklist —7— (9637d) ~' Yes Maybe No b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short—term, to the disadvantage of long—term, environmental goals? (A short—term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long—term impacts will endure well into the future.) X C. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively consid— erable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) _ X d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? _ _ X Environmental Checklist —8— (9637d) ^_ i DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there _ will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Date Signa e Revised: March, 1990 For: City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department Environmental Checklist —9— (9637d) ............ ZONING INDEX MAP 9-5 II 10-5 11 DM 9 DMII LEGEND 19-6-10-SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE 16-5-II 15-� 11 -5 1 DM 18 D 17 DM' 5 DM22-DISTRICT MAP 22 JI �24-5�12 19-5-11 '--20-5-11 2111 22-15-11 J 24-5-11 -'5"1 71 DM 28\ DM 21 DNCP y DM24 DM 25 DA 26 DMI,27 X_ .•.......... 30-5-11 29-5-11 28; 27-5-11 2 -5-11 25- -ll AM 35 DM \1DM'33 TD2 M 31 30 PKC)LJEC:-r i q- -c-,32-5'11 33-5-11 36-15-11 DM�6 DM 37 38 j 9 DM 40 L 5-6-11 1U 3-6-11 2 46-1, 1-6-11 6-6-10 5 ,3-10 D M 4 DM3 DM Q�A 2 91-6-1M10 1 DM 0-6-11 _12-6-11 7-6-10 6-6-10 ts DM 10 DM W 12 DM 13 D+M 7 /D/M 8 13-6-11 f8-6-10 17-6-10 CITY OF DNC 14 DIA 20 DM 19 HUNTINGTON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA /� / 24�- 19- -10 ....... DM29 D b22/ u.iwc coV.—CE W..24 VICINITY MAP f . ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD June 13, 1991 RECEIVED JUN 1 8 1991 CITY OF HUNT INGTON BEACH Dept.of Comm. Development 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach. CA 92648 ATTENTION: Ms. Julie Osugi , Planning Aid SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM NO. 91-13 REQUEST: Zone change from R2 to R3 - Zone Change No. 91-2, Tentative Parcel Map 96-322 and Use Permit No. 90-63 PROJECT LOCATION: 2210 N. Huntington Street .(East side) RECOMMENDATIONS: The Environmental Board Committee has the following concerns about the request for a zone change on this property: 6. NOISE a. Long-Term: The zone change requested for this property will place an R3 residence adjacent to one story R1 residences. Since we assume this will be a two story project, the resulting increase in noise catigorizeo as a "maybe" should be changed to "yes" . At the present time there is a buffer of open space and mature trees between the single -family residences and the appartment development. w B. LAND USE: The zone change from R2 to R3 allows a doubling of the development of this lard. Thus this project should be catagorized as a "yes" rather than a "mavbe" with regard to substantiai alteration of the present or planned land use of area. 13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION: b. The development of this property will comply with 960 of the Huntington Beach Ordinate Code. However, it will force the tennants of the existing apartments who now park in front of and on the property to be developed, to seek parking in the adjacent single family residence a-ea. 21 . MANDITORY FINDINGS OF. SIGNIFICANCE: a. d. We consider that this project will have considerable effect upon the adjacent single family !7 residences. Since . it is .assumed J t will be a .two story building, it will . infringe upon the privacy of these single story single -family residences. Other than stated above, the committee has no further issues to address on this matter. Your attention to these concerns is respectfully appreciated. Cordially, Charles R. Montero, Chairman, Environmental Board Suzanne Heritage, Chairman ad hoc Committee seh cc : R. H. Richardson, Planning Commission. ti CIZt TY OF HUNTING TON BEACH,- INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION JJ HUNTINGTON BEACH To Environmental Board Members From Julie Osugi Planning Aide Subject RESPONSE TO COMMENTS FOR DRAFT Date July 11, 1991 NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-13 Thank you for taking the time to review and comment on Draft Negative Declaration No . 91-13 . The Draft Negative Declaration analyzes the environmental impacts associated with a request to rezone approximately 2, 600 square feet located at 2210 N. Huntington Street from R2 to R3 to bring the zoning into conformance with the R3 zoned property to the north. The project also consists of a Tentative Parcel Map (89-322) and Use Permit (90-63) to consolidate the rezoned property with the parcel to the north and to construct two additional two-story detached single family type units . Staff has reviewed the Environmental Board ' s concerns and has the following comments : 1 . Environmental Board Concern Noise: The zone change requested for this property will place an R3 residence adjacent to one story R1 residences . Since we assume this will be a two story project, the resulting increase in noise catagorized as a "maybe" should be changed to "yes" . At the present time there is a buffer of open space and mature trees between the single family residences and the apartment development . Response: Comment noted. The response for item 6a of the checklist will be changed from "maybe" to "yes" . However, staff has analyzed the proposed project and maintains that the discussion under the item is appropriate since noise generated by 2 additional two-story detached single family type units in a predominantly developed area is not anticipated to be significant . 2 . Environmental Board Concern: Parking: The development of this property will comply with 960 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. However, it, will force the tennants of the existing apartments who now park in front of and on the property to be developed, to seek parking in the adjacent single family residence area . Response: There is currently space to park two vehicles in front of the project site. The proposed project will result in the loss of approximately one of these off-street parking spaces due to installation of a curb cut to access the property. However, loss of any other additional parking is not anticipated. The site is currently overgrown with fairly tall weeds and grasses and does not have any improved access onto Huntington Street . Field inspections of the site have not observed any use of the site for parking . It is further anticipated that access to the site is frequently blocked by cars parked on the street in front of the site. Therefore, use of the site as a parking lot is considered highly unlikely. 3 . Environmental Board Concern: Land Use : The zone change from R2 to R3 allows a doubling of the development of this land . Thus this project should be catagorized as a "yes" rather than a "maybe" with regard to substantial alteration of the present of planned land use of area . Response: Comment noted . The "maybe" response for item 8 of the checklist will be changed to "yes" . However , it should be noted that the zone change will allow for one additional unit on the property and that the impacts associated with the development of one additional unit are not anticipated to be significant . 4 . Environmental .poard Concern: Mandatory Findings of Significance : We consider that this project will have considerable effect upon the adjacent ' single family residences . Since it is assumed it will be a two story building, it will infringe upon the privacy of these single story single family residences . Response: The proposed development is two-stories tall ; however, Unit B which is closest to the adjacent single family residences contains only one window on the second-story which faces the adjacent single family homes . See attached plans . The window is for a bathroom and is not anticipated to result in any privacy impacts to the adjacent residences . Unit A does propose a second story bedroom window which faces the single family homes . However, the window is located more than eleven feet from there property line of the adjacent single family homes . (0213d) Lam:' 9 L..YTO 0I C%OTw MOrK L-0 Gr FK I—1-1 IMpTw.'MI.C—C,d.00r W6.93•PROF.LNC 20,0'rROr.LNC �I>—�r�s�us—u rr>•�� 4I n ----- ,,,,,, GENERAL DATA S 1 ( 1 -RO,ILT OCOCRVTION _ TO COIATRU A 4 OWCLLNG Fr WITH O'-0 T•0 ON A Irrr GARAGCO O/TTPE TI CONOT. • n'-0'•• ON A OrtC WITH CXIOTNG APARTL!)ITO. ►.wcw ' rROFERTY AC-DRCOO t � I��IMQ� I� OILOT (( a(Jw 2WO IIORTH ULKnHGfON OTRECT j 1 HLXTNGTOH OCACH•CA 9]6A6 f iy LCGAL OWNCR 1[,� 1 i W1tLN!DEVELOPMENT {{ r C3WO OO)A IAC 1 AVGat Ou11t LOO {l1f OmrA MEGA. 6 1169i t3 lH)»0-3666 PLANNING DATA 1 1 zoNE -Ra 1 s J LOT OQC -MOM OO rT. 1 exnn+c on7A J 9 V rA�TIG , •, LW CCUNT Ip U NITO LAIOOC Vw OI-ORE rARKNG u COVCRCD OTALLZ �3y{1 Sl errc coveRAGe - ez24 Oo./T.uu> q 1rf 1 ���m�1��UV® Qxt IiAtlo r • < rRoroxO DATAUNIT O4 0 O 431�11W�1p1�1p1 Y IIiNM1�UV 11 r-- -- 7( CIDUG/ARKN ow"i tLO W)TOTAL �I ®1y10LS��N1� 11 /ARKNG►ROVIDCD ( AR GARAGCO b (2)OPEN OTALLO j (6)i)TOTAL I n e•� !!'�• •-1• OfR COVERAGC 1NI 00./T. O I OrCH CeACC REOUIRCD - S n 60./T.• II qq ---- i O'-O TO 10'O OrCH OrACC PROVIDCDL �. . Q 0 ---------� WRIVATr 802 C NJ = L ' ----- 9 1 0/T O -----� TOTAL DITC GOVCRACC LO 06'!OO.rT.(•JO1LI if0 O 1 1 :• F I --!OTALLD— 1<)I Uaa_v__-N,1 • �MVAT r I TRAOH � LN[or•Ir.o.w AeQVC ----- -- CxeTw n Cx eWOOwCNw L.vOOCAIW �.n� PTlI/CR .. 1 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. M1CLN1 OCV40II.tNT R0�90 N6 DI►ROI,L.i W.LNC !.w reOUL.L Ave.91r7L 170 COOiA wCOA,CA 1 626 1 l�l!�D-lii6 CQCItC1C Clrl• CODTA Z MA, CA V676 OI --CxRITw IM AI'RAO-- NCYI ORM AMOR 1'M 1 9A0 .6i 1/\ ------- NORTW WWTNGTON OMMET —•—•—•— BUTE PUH NL®RTH W 2 h..I. np•-p. l n OGO I OCD Dn. DCO. ,b �r b ---- 4f P t ; Dn. V Q xc. � IS) ^ 11 o ,af( 7 D[D. b jt t f'i• YT i' ..•.p• ]O..C. nM 1111U�Il 4J M S U? a �u u� SECCHD LEVELS Z3u u� �uS<( ]O'O' n'.p• azuM ,Ya3 FOOTAGE CALC5. t 2 KIT. 1 _ 0 LIVMG KIT. 1 C UNIT n Q 1•C I R FIRST LCV[L CNTRT OWING OpG OO.FT, p GARnG[ 5CGOND LCVCL OOl 90.FT, y ytj DwING i. § b TOTAL LIVNG 013 00.FT O nRAG[ 43150.FT OCGIClf 124 9..FT.. 12.10-90 TRY 9 2-CAR micneN mdldiM LIVING b GnR nG[ UNIT D FIRST L[VCL 70G�O.FT 7CCON0 LCVCL OOl CIO FT TOTAL LIVNG 139 00.FT.1 GARAGE 50 FT. 124 OCCKO 12a 90..FT, >'i' IYi' n'.p• Y•O' >C'O' 1�� MOT a Mir 0 aD (FORST LEVEL [FLOOR PIL MS dael. ® m m a . t{{� r u u a ; n 0� ® 0u00 r BLDG. 0 S®M ELEVA700a o a In TTPIG.IL EXTERIOR M.1TER1^L3 b ® of aa�er --jj --1 •DnRRCL TILL ROOT NG �NeN mMldkt' ® ❑❑ 00 ® >; •P—Tr MO WALLS N RN ROOT LOIGC7 nu 10�10 O •PA WTLO [TAL ALLONT RAILD •IARRLO WOOD OARAOC OOORD SLUG. 0 BLDG. a YES7 ELIEea700a 0 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP Ng 89 - 322 BASIS OF BCARwIQf al THE CITY Of HUNTINGTON BEACH. Tm[K•ma••o, mD••rm ro• TK curt.cart v COUNTY Of ORANOE,STATE OF CALWORINA. w,r ao romra r•t[T •a RO/m Op m✓ r —• AP'dR10N OF LOT 2a02 1M[AST StOf V�IJ.'TRAST, mn wa. q•a,4,■[.o+Dt a• o••.•[ court Y, AS PEA A MAP RECORO[D W BOOK•,PAGE 63.Or .w Tm•■ m✓. MUC[LLAILOUS MAH,W THE Of710E OF THE COV[T7 RECORDER Of ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORrM- 'RTlYlNlON, ►ORTO i P49KCR, INC. JONSI E. !TKYRNSON R.C.R. 00. 22440 12195 YoOlirmett goat, su taa D i! — IrvlRa, Calltoral• 92714 (714)ai• — 8822 LEGENDS toll. .erpr N•.• [pYl. plern W.I. Mp p• [dal. a•.pr limp • Ed•t. RiCMIM• oil M.'//r�/^JI • E dal. p a 1« I 1 fL CLAY AVENUE • ��•[' EjAST SIDE VILLAI TRACT 8 `.ii oo°• ■ ///111 1 I I M.M. 4-67I I a I 7 0 •w.ar' •( •p'•.�.P. I � : •I I II I I I c I � pru'•'t •.••' : I I I I W - LULL I I �T Q II Q li I Z \PARCEL I V : -'y e[nai. •rT •l N. �I 1 E PARCEL 1 C i[••.C.P. z •� P.M. 79-560 a v+ • 1- I^I I SE DETAIL'A" ;•••,y, rt.c[ I ► , P.IL. , 14 6/411 E ti .. a.00• Z I — / • ,' I PARCEL lurt r ��.•1 x .;r.�L. o z - • " I I I TRACT I 13522 III I I I Y I I 3 III I� S CLEVELAND DRIVE ' A, --- y P A. I 8 i c, JH I —_ PSL*,QTUMIAT Crow=OT"T ;T EOATI7O7OR 10CR ( A 7771 17TB; i KuwrING•POM BLUM a 93646 (714)'Slh7a77 — �� QO ►ARC6.7 aQIaA At"ZJITATR 71.0 RLONILL AVENUE, KITE 1S0 COCTA UOOIA. CA 97626 (714) S40-7644 �a DETAIL "A- 10 .s • Y Y Ib rb• y SCALE 1* SO' iGARFIELD AVE.I L RA 0 c III R R2 2 > o mi C2 o co I? R2 MI-A 0 RA-0 < R2 RA-O,' R2 5:1MI-A-0 cr_ cr R2 R2 R2 C 41 R 2 R2' — �2 _R2 M I R - (0)132�-01 R2 R2 5 I _1Z —CLAY _R2 15 f PLANDISTRICT I.J.x AVE, C2-0- U. I" -.1....oor_ I ......................... ........ V 3 R3 c 2: R4 2 R2 �;�g R2-0-PD 0 �C I.1EE' 7 ,wR 2 ji -- R 2 R2-0 7 290 2 Al E. V cr c —0- m F A Ob" R L C-L A M) �/R 4� RI C2 0 CD 2-( .1 1:L111 I All F� c� C2-0-CD r, C2-0 R 2 2R o:10 ;01 9 to _CD i-o- 132-0 RI R11 p-rI T.39 50 -ILL JAIVS AVE C2 LI SW! z R2 R2 2 Lu R2 R2-0-C� I OP-0-CD R2-0-Po--(:: R 2 0 C2-0-CDRI RZ C 1h 250 L_ AVE, C c R2-0-CD 4 R".-0 11 R2 -0 CF-C R2-0-CD CF-E-CD M." �;F.N_R) "RA R 2 C -CD-0 U, sCF-E-CD R2-0 R2 R2 O�)TC YN AI R I-0)E Sp FIFI_ cc jo ��TRIIICD I T =-�D-0 F ,O__IR4 ZC 91 -02/TPM 90-322/ UP 90-63/EA 91 -13 HILINTINGTONSEACH HUNTINGTON REACH PLANNING DIVISION ORDINANCE NO. ✓ ` AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 9061 THEREOF TO PROVIDE FOR CHANGE OF ZONING FROM "MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL" TO "MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL" ON REAL PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON 0 . 06 ACRES ON THE EAST SIDE OF HUNTINGTON STREET APPROXIMATELY 310 FEET SOUTH OF THE CLAY AVENUE CENTERLINE. (ZONE CHANGE 91-2) WHEREAS, pursuant to the State Planning and Zoning Law, the Huntington Beach Planning Commission and Huntington Beach City Council have had separate public hearings relative to Zone Change No . 91-2 wherein both bodies have carefully considered all information presented at said hearings, and after due consideration of the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission and all evidence presented to said City Council, the City Council finds that such code amendment is proper, and consistent with the General Plan, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. The following described real property, generally located on the east side of Huntington Street, approximately 310 feet south of the Clay Avenue centerline is hereby changed from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to R3 (Medium High Density Residential) : Parcel I All that certain land in the city of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California, situated over a portion of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 79-560 as recorded in Parcel Map Book 146, Pages 48 and 49, records of said County. Said land is more particularly described as follows : 1 Beginning at the point of intersection of the southerly line of said parcel 1 and the easterly right-of-way line of Huntington Street, being 60 . 00 feet in width as shown on said Parcel Map No. 79-560; thence along said right-of-way line, north 20 . 01 feet; thence leaving said line, N89059 ' 27"E, 129 . 90 feet; thence s00°00 ' 27"E, 19 . 72 feet to a point on said south line of Parcel 1; thence along said line, S89051 ' 46"W, 129 .90 feet to the point of beginning. Containing: 2, 580. 5 square feet . more or less . SECTION 2. The Director of Community Development is hereby directed to amend Section 9061, District Map 2 (Sectional District Map 2-6-11) to reflect Zone Change No. 91-2 described in Section 1 hereof . Copies of said district maps, as amended hereby are available for inspection in the Office of the City Clerk. SECTION 3 . This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its passage. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council - of the City of Huntington Beach, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of 1991. Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: —.4 r;Ibn/ City Clerk1 � City ikttorney REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND, APPROVED: City Administrator Director of Community Development 2 Stevenson Porto& Pier.ce.,Inc'. C. r; C C C; c C.C. April 10 , 1991 Mr. Mike Connor CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 Subject: ZONE CHANGE - R-2 TO R-3 J.N. 89023 Dear Mike: This written narrative is in accordance with the requirement for filing a zone change application in the City of Huntington Beach. The application requests a zone change from R-2 (Medium Density Residential) to R-3 (Median High Density Residential) on a piece of property that measures approximately 20 feet by 130 feet, or 2 , 600 square feet. This zone change request is associated with Parcel Map 90-322 which is on file with the City and is being processed concurrently with this application. The parcel map application proposes to combine this strip of vacant land with a larger parcel to allow the construction of two additional detached dwelling units. City Staff has determined, however, that the small strip of vacant land currently zoned R-2 must be changed to R-3 in order to allow construction of the proposed units. The larger parcel of land consists of 18 , 933 square feet, of which approximately 14 , 985 square feet is developed with an existing 13 unit two story apartment building."- The remaining 4 , 008 square feet is vacant land. It is the intent of the project applicant to combine the small strip of land with the larger vacant piece of property in order to provide a buildable lot that will allow the construction of the two proposed units . I An Environmental Assessment Form was completed in conjunction with the zone change application. The Environmental Form was prepared based on the proposed development of the two units on the vacant parcels of land and did not include information with regards to the existing two story apartment building. COP F f 00 A C 00 0 t C r! b 6 A A P O O C R Q t 6 April 10, 1991 Mr. Mike Connor Page 2 The project area is characterized as residential, with apartments north of the site, condominiums west of the property, single-family detached homes on the south and a church east of the site. This zone change and accompanying parcel map application will provide additional residential housing which is characteristic of the area. There are existing utilities adjacent to the site available to serve the project. The project applicant will install curb, gutter and sidewalk along the parcel frontage, completing the improvements along this section of North Huntington Street. This should adequately address the information required by the zone change application. If you need additional information, please call me. Sincerely, �. Philip C. Martin PCM/ks S k- r . D�'01. 01CL August 13, 1991 Mr. Hal Simmons CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 Subject: PLANNING COMMISSION RECONSIDERATION ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 91-13 ZONE CHANGE 91-2 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 89-322 USE PERMIT NO. 90-63 Dear Hal: Thank you for all of your help and assistance over the last two years to bring this project to the point it is today. The original concept and the direction of the plan has changed considerably since we originally met and submitted the project back in October of 1989. We felt that the project that was considered and recommended for approval on July 23, 1991 represented the best compromise and provided the best transitional use of the property based on concerns expressed by the City and area residents. It is our understanding that the Planning Commission would like to reconsider their July 23, 1991 action regarding the above-referenced case numbers. It is because of that impending reconsideration that we have prepared this letter. HISTORY AND EXISTING CONDITION: Whelan Development currently.owns the apartment property at 2810 Huntington Street. This property was developed with thirteen (13) apartments and with the associated parking and open space as required by the City when it was constructed. The property was purchased as it currently is and no structural alterations have taken place to change the use and/or reduce the amount of parking and open space. When the property was developed, a 30 foot portion of the site was not utilized. This 30 foot wide area is located along the southetiy portion of the developed part of the apartment property. The 30 foot portion of the site Is currently vacant and has been since the development of the site. There is a six (6) foot high garden wall that separates the patio areas of the ground floor apartment units from the vacant 30 foot area. Access from the developed portion of the site to the vacant portion of the site is precluded because of the wall and the physical Impairment of the apartment building. The only way to get from the vacant portion of the site to the developed apartment area is to exit the vacant site onto Huntington Street and to enter the apartment area through either the apartment drive or the apartment building entry. Aorra�.� ►7- 1`�.a 9 Mr. Hal Simmons August 13, 1991 Page 2 The First United Methodist Church currently owns a vacant 20 foot wide strip of land, south of the vacant 30 foot strip owned by Whelan Development that has been used periodically as a pedestrian access to the church site from Huntington Street. Through the years the church has determined that this pedestrian access is not necessary and that this strip of land is surplus. No improvements were ever placed on the site. This 20 foot wide strip of land directly abuts the Whelan 30 foot wide vacant area creating a 50 foot wide vacant parcel that appears for all intents and purposes to be actually one piece of property. This vacant property is in fact under two ownerships. . Upon determining that the land was surplus, it was our understanding that the church attempted to offer the 20 foot strip of land for sale to the adjacent residents whose property front Cleveland Drive. There are two (2) residences that back up to the 20 foot wide remainder church property. Both residents would have to have purchased the vacant church area and have processed a parcel map to assemble the church property into their lot. It is our understanding that the church could not reach a deal with the adjacent homeowners. It was at this point that the church approached Whelan Development to offer their vacant 20 foot parcel to them. City Staff determined that the vacant Whelan property and the vacant church property could not be combined to form a new lot because a portion of the vacant Whelan property was necessary to meet the open space and density requirement for the apartment project at 2810 Huntington. However, if the vacant church property could be added into the overall Whelan property including both the vacant portion and the developed apartment portion, then two additional units meeting current code could be placed on the site. The plans recommended for approval by the Planning Commission on July 23, 1991 were the result of our two year planning effort with City Staff and the constraints of the two sites. PROPOSED PROJECT: Tentative Parcel Map 89-322 proposes to combine the vacant church parcel with the Whelan Development apartment building parcel forming a site for additional rental dwelling units. Two single family style detached units are proposed to be constructed on the vacant site. Staff recommended at the last Planning Commission hearing that the rear unit be rotated so that a larger setback from the existing single family residences to the south could be achieved. This was an excellent suggestion and it will be incorporated as a part of the final site plan. The proposed project as described includes a two car garage for each unit and one on-site guest parking space per unit meeting development code requirements. All development standards including but not limited to setbacks, open space, density, parking, access, etc. have been met or exceeded. The project was created with the intent that the two single family units would provide a subtle transition between the more dense apartments to the north and the single family homes to the south. The apartment project is located on the southeast corner of Huntington and Clay Streets. The single family homes front Cleveland Drive. The proposed project fronts Huntington Street only, thereby giving the site the appearance of a separate and distinct property while In reality It Is a portion of the thirteen unit apartment project to the north. In order to accomplish the proposed development plan, it is necessary to combine the church's 20 foot wide property with the larger apartment property thereby creating a 50 foot wide vacant parcel that can be developed. It was also determined by City Staff that a Zone Change would be required to re-zone the church's R-2 remainder to the apartments R-3. Mr. Hal Simmons August 13, 1991 Page 3 CONCERNS: On July 23, 1991, the Planning Commission approved and recommended to the City Council that they also approve the project as proposed with the conditions of approval. It is our understanding that the Planning Commission would now like to reconsider their action. To our knowledge, the appeal period for this project has passed and no adjacent land owners have appealed this project so the reconsideration must be due to concerns of the Planning Commission. The remainder property owned by Whelan Is only 30 feet wide. By itself it is undevelopable for any use except open space. It is not of sufficient width to allow parking because access, turn around space and stall configuration, etc. would not meet City standards. Additionally, providing parking on the 30 foot wide parcel would necessitate users to back out onto Huntington Street thereby creating an unsafe and dangerous condition. Development of the 30 foot wide vacant site for any type of residential use would also be impractical because the width of the site would create the above-referenced parking constraints and the required setbacks would preclude a viable living unit. The physical separation of the vacant 30 foot parcel from the remaining apartment property would also impair the development of the site without significant reconstruction of the apartment building. Lastly, the density requirements would allow only the development of one additional unit and the physical separation from the existing apartment building would create practical and immediate difficulties. The development of the remainder church parcel as a separate entity is impossible given the setback requirements only. The site itself is not even adequate (too narrow) for two way vehicular ingress and egress to the larger church parcel. The only logical way to develop the vacant portion of the Whelan parcel and the vacant church parcel is to combine the two areas as a part of the larger apartment project and to develop two rental residential units. We have looked at trying to decrease the ground floor foot print of the two units in order to increase parking. However, the setback requirements, the parking requirements and the open space requirements preclude any reduction as the size of the rooms on the ground floor are already minimal. There are no bedrooms on the first floor, so we cannot eliminate a bedroom to increase the available land area on the ground for parking. The only way to gain additional parking on the site would be to eliminate one or both of the proposed units. Eliminating the proposed front unit would create a land area where a total of seven (7) parking stalls could be placed on the site and one living unit could still be placed on the rear of the site. These additional parking stalls would be physically removed from the apartment project that they would be serving and pedestrian access from the apartments to the site would be along the sidewalk on Huntington Street. The proposed residential unit would be located effectively at the end of a parking lot. It should be noted that eliminating the front residential unit would eliminate two garage spaces and one guest parking space so that the net gain in parking would only be three additional parking stalls. Mr. Hal Simmons August 13, 1991 Page 4 CONCLUSION: The First United Methodist Church is dependent on donations and contributions for their support. They see the sale of their 20 foot strip of land as a way to generate some much needed capital. The church by virtue of their charter is precluded from using the proceeds of this sale for any other purpose than to improve their facilities. If the land sale Is finalized by the approval and recordation of the parcel map, zone change and use permit, the church will be making much needed improvements on their site. The church's 20 foot vacant property has a certain land value based on an appraisal. Whelan Development has negotiated a price for the purchase of the property based on its appraisal, usability and the various actions required to develop the two vacant areas when combined. Although economics should not enter the decision making process, it must be noted that each vacant area is useless without the other as the developability of either Is significantly hindered. Whelan Development currently has a viable and legally defensible apartment project that was permitted and developed under the Codes and Ordinances that were in effect at the time the project was processed through the City. No one knows why the vacant portion of the property was left undeveloped but there is no practical way that this vacant portion of the apartment property can be developed without assembling the 20 foot wide vacant church parcel. The church is not interested in giving away their property and they hope to get a fair and reasonable price. It would appear that Whelan Development would be the only potential purchaser who would be able to do something with the site but in order to pay the church a fair and reasonable price, a minimum yield of two units is necessary. Approving the parcel map to assemble the church parcel into the larger apartment parcel and then requiring either all or a portion of the site to be utilized for parking would not be economically viable and would not yield enough parking stalls to significantly alter the conditions existing on Huntington Street. Allowing the Planning Commission's previous recommendations to stand enabling the development of the two proposed units would facilitate the clean up of an eye-sore; would provide two additional rental units which would undoubtedly fall within the guidelines for affordability; would provide a logical and orderly transition between the apartments to the north and the single family homes to the south and would provide for completion of the street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the frontage of the vacant parcels. We would respectfully request that Staff recommend to the Planning Commission to allow their previous, decision to stand and to move the Zone Change on to the City Council for approval based on the previous testimony, the Staff report dated July 16, 1991, the Findings and Conditions of Approval dated July 25, 1991 and the information contained in this letter. We would be pleased to discuss this matter with you at your convenience. Please contact us if you need additional information or if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, Michael A. Porto MAP/ks ■ Sufts East 714-660-8822 September 23, 1991 Mr. Hal Simmons CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 Subject: PLANNING COMMISSION RECONSIDERATION ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 91-13 ZONE CHANGE 91-2 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 89-322 USE PERMIT NO. 90-63 Dear Hal: The Planning Commission, at their meeting of September 4, 1991, continued the above-referenced applications in order to allow us to provide an additional site plan layout indicating additional parking, possibly under a residential unit. As you will recall,we previously submitted a plan that had a living unit over parking but it was rejected by Staff because of various concerns. We have reworked our original plan to incorporate Staffs request;we are providing a plan showing the front unit remaining as it has on all previous submittals with a living unit over parking and we have taken the liberty of providing a third plan maximizing parking by placing both living units over parking. Each plan is detailed below. SCHEME 1 - TWO INDIVIDUAL SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED APARTMENTS: This particular plan is the plan that has been presented to the Planning Commission at their meetings.of September 4, 1991 and July 23, 1991. Staff recommended that the rear unit be rotated so that a larger setback was achieved along the southerly property line. This was accomplished on this Scheme and the guest parking was revised to conform to the new lay out. This particular plan meets and exceeds the requirements of the City of Huntington Beach Zoning Code with many respects. All setbacks, open space, site coverage and parking requirements are meet by this plan. This plan further provides a visual transition from the apartment project to the north to the single family homes to the south. The view from Huntington Street will be that of a single family home. It is this plan that was recommended for approval by Staff at the previous meetings and we agree with that recommendation. SCHEME 2 - ONE UNIT PRESENTED AS A SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED STRUCTURE WITH A TWO CAR GARAGE. THE SECOND UNIT IS PRESENTED AS BEING OVER ITS OWN GARAGE WITH ADDITIONAL GUEST PARKING UNDER IT: This plan was previously presented to Staff. It would allow for the provision of a total of four (4) guest parking stalls. However,when a residential structure is designed horizontally rather than vertically,additional square feet of land area are used. This particular plan does meet many of the criteria required by the Huntington Beach Zoning Code, however it also requires a variance for setback. It is our understanding that a ten (10) foot building setback is required adjacent to the east property line. We have proposed a five (5) foot setback in this area as it is adjacent to the Church parking lot and therefore open space and this 5 foot Mr. Hal Simmons September 23, 1991 Page 2 setback is in keeping with the setback that currently exists on the apartment project to the north. The front garage unit can be located within 10 feet of the front property line when the garage is a "turn in" configuration as shown. Unit B does set back 5 feet from the south property line, however, this setback is allowable by the Zoning Code. The upstairs part of the living unit is set back an additional 5 feet (15 feet total) which is in compliance with the Huntington Beach Code. This proposed solution does encroach on the site coverage requirement by 783 square feet (4 percent) again because of the horizontal alignment of the living unit. It should be noted though, that adequate open space is available for each living unit through the use of decks and ground floor land area. An added bonus of this plan is the inclusion of the storage area in the wasted corner of Unit B. While this plan does require a variance for setbacks adjacent to the open Church parking lot it does carry forth a consistent setback line and provides additional parking which was a concern of the Planning Commission. This scheme also requires a site coverage variance because of the encroachment on the maximum site coverage requirement. SCHEME 3 - BOTH LIVING UNITS ON THE SECOND FLOOR WITH MAXIMUM PARKING UNDER THE LIVING UNITS: Based upon the Planning Commission's concerns to maximize parking on the site, we have prepared Scheme 3 to detail this possibility. There would be a basic gain of a total of 4 additional parking stalls. Six of the parking spaces.(4 in garages.and 2 open guest spaces) are required by the development itself. The remaining four spaces could be utilized by additional guests of the residents of the adjacent apartment. This plan of course places more mass on the property. than the two previous schemes. All open space requirements are met as are all setbacks except the setback on the east property line as stated under the explanation of Scheme 2 above. Accomplishing this design scheme, the front unit, unit A, is reduced from a three bedroom, 2 bath unit as in Schemes A& B to a two bedroom one bath unit. This plan would require an encroachment of 763 square feet (4 percent} into the maximum required site coverage in conjunction with the 5 foot setback variance from the east property. line. Conclusion: While each of the Schemes presented has merit, only Scheme 1 meets all of the criteria established by the Huntington Beach Zoning Code as interpreted by Staff. Scheme 2 increases the available guest parking by two stalls but the open space is diminished-and the east setback is reduced, requiring a variance, although the unit is adjacent to a church parking lot. Scheme 3 gains a total of 4 parking spaces over those required but again the open space is diminished,the east setback would require a variance and the buildings are more massive. Whelan Development is ready to move ahead with any of the plans presented and respectfully requests your consideration of the plans and the consideration of the Planning Commission. We would be pleased to answer any questions that you may have regarding any of these schemes. Please do not hesitate to call. Zc 1 r y, . hael A. Porto MAP/ks f HUNTINGTON BEACH DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL 10-8-91 I am unable to attend tonights meeting because of illness. When I spoke to you at the last meeting, my neighbor who watched it on television said that I looked angry. The reason that I started to get so angry is that when I moved here 12 years ago, there were no three story condominiums across the street. Now, added to this we have a lot of noise from the church school playground at the end of the street, compounded by a major traffic and parking problem. My neighbors across .the-street already have a. two story building near enough to see into their back yards, and the proposal of a three story building will only add to that invasion of privacy, not to mention the extra traffic noise and all-around overcrowded condition that exists now. The existing apartments there, up until a couple of months ago, had heavy shrubbery on the Clay Street side and was unpainted and unkept. ]Recently they have been painted, cleaned up and have a gardener. The property now being considered for development was overgrown, not kept up like it was when I first moved there. Recently it was mowed and cleaned up for the benefit of the development council, I suspect. What should we expect in the future? After the money is made on this Project, who will maintain and take an interest in the apartment complex? I doubt if the tenants will do anything to upgrade the apartments condition, rather they will tend to be apathetic altogether. A neighbor of mine who lives down the street who is bothered by-the church playground noise, said it didn't affect him because his property backs up to the church parking lot, and it shouldn't affect me because I live across the street. I have to look at it and I think it affects everyone. I thought Huntington Beach was a community and family oreinted city. I don't think we have to fill every square inch of land in Huntington Beach with a building. There needs to be a grassy area for our children. They don't always get to see the country and its nice when they can see a piece of grass, rather than a slab of concrete or a building. It is my belief that we can all benefit by keeping this either undeveloped, or allow the single residence to be built by Harry Monck and use the rest of the property for extra parking for the apartments. Sincerely, Deborah A. Dreier 308 Cleveland Drive � � RECEIVE 'D JUL 5 1991 July 10., 1991 Dept.of Comm.Development FROM: Concerned Neighbors TO: City of Huntington Beach Planning Department SUBJECT: Zone Change No. 91--2 2910 Huntington Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA We the undersigned residences and property owners, now living in the immediate area of this proposed zone change, do hereby recommend to the City and Staff that this Proposal be denied based on the following facts regarding this property. 1 . This property is presently nonconforming for open space requirements, private and common . 2 . This property is presently nonconforming for setbacks . 3 . The applicant is requesting another driveway encroach- ment, thus adding to the ingress/egress problems which presently, and for many years now, are what we consider inadequate . 4 . We do not feel the proposed zone change follows the City General Land Use Plan adopted for our City. 5 . Most of us have lived in this area for a period of not less than five years and have experienced such problems as large 'parties, trash, and inadequate parking . We know that the City police records would back us up on these allegations. 6 . We do not feel that the addition of additional apartments in this location , with close proximity to existing single family and low density developments, is in the best interest of adjoining residences . 7 . We have viewed the proposed layout and feel that the possibility of a future lot split, dividing the one parcel , is also a possibility. 8 . We believe that the vacant lot was designed as part of the required open space for the now existing 13 units and is not presently, or in the past, being maintained properly; therefore, adding more units is just going to compound the existing problem. .. . City of Huntington Beach Planning Department Zone Change 91-2 July 10, 1991 Page Two 9 . We have submitted .some pictures. showing-the normal parking problem on and off this site. Your recommendation for denial of Zone . Change No. 91-2 would be sincerely backed by us. Thank you for your time in this matter. NAME ADDRESS 3o 3 c-(�ELA AJD 4,,ecyV a S. VA C_ G r i tip-`.._, -3�.0 C_�✓ you - - K,� \r�/a '14 0 avr� A Ca,e ►v�L 3i4 CGEVee_A^j O DP, �o a �,z/ 7- ` r NAME ADDRESS 2-�og, art, cri-A 3 R-o IS Gi ; er+h LOOL n, -I(oy l C1a `ot �t,�o�Ub Q �a�►'u- - �4 vkn--. 1�-)e.-h CA `7661 Clc,(-i 4u-c Col- r 2 Of -72 wit c - E � biE -- - - --- }- NAME ADDRESS YYt 0 14�.A/N5"r ,QE Zod1/�tlG ?� Z- 3 _ 1 I i i _ /, p�, t i.�->~~ �,,�k"rR_ •„� hic� r +_�..,Z -�s•W* 'taF.S I '.��'�-'' `.L�NI. �,!` �-,.,�,-�+�- r r`f+may •t.�,�yo'r`�rr�i %•-�3 fi• _ , y!n ej J/tt �eri'+Y'y��•{ '.►�_'{} •�14.M,•�"K•r�:� r7�ti. r'[ r (E.^•.. i>•.... /W-, fir' R }dr�• 4, • � © - �k�i„�i tl d • t _ � t �M 2 G �• � y + :.:k.:'n'I w�) :l J.-__ _ u k. t ,i>t a� �f.�,o W .a.. "' d� w 1. -•e - .•.t .S, f.. �4r1Kw- f a. ±t�'_.:t`._.c•_/n�;'1.�1-- ___: _ _ __ _ _ ��'�j.,.` ,�.� ��. i. .' '.' " �:t, .'t ` -r •,~fir :ii `' f- ('9.�a1 .. t��.. •�M r v •• •^-' —. a:t..r' 71 _ __ ✓., .i .516 R _ i _1 ,cam;�'l vM' :•1 ..v s^�+..�.,_,�_ -�' r t A A �• `''�y jam'^`,, �. ®. ',�, �:F{ �. _ . . � •;.:`-' � 't•1 :.. t .h t.-ate 4 — �' �ry>4 +;, •- R d ad d� a+. �:.rw y.-�J+'J•> i•. .,te20m-1�rt -,< 7 � gi 4 •.r�ta�r � �I �( �4 kr_ t i .1 .e• .. �•'^ ^.. mnip +( • — t ) - //y/�/��---�.._ 1 �3�•. C Frc �r r 1'.1 ...m:•�__i - � 'i �f_..::�... .4_wV7 Ii' !'. i. � !4 't tit i 1 �,� it - , ti-t s L`t Y�1✓ �. �Y��a v- �. y �... Y `` a�154� r"Y s� •'l :j ' � � ♦ � /�r •• r• ! rs.. YI"t��7- SQ'���2i.�a 14 r. I - �t ?'r. a � '• 'atii� lit i, #'f tt0 .9F i�.' `'�j�, ISr c 7 t Ito ti ?r-��•� :;.. ."+t':.,.v =�'N•...ti 'l"`` #r�.uL,r y'�W� � 1'1�,.7'i'�Fd �.e•, k'` t-- r �'y'tcw. u"��m w..-. �.,,.._.. •-'+�a• r, , .._•'. -_ 4 .. "- � 'i!. �`,4. c+- 'tk�1j'' � w� �� r ��i4}t-"� ?far Y �'�.� •3 .' � .>v' � ,. .*:h-G' . '.> -�d; ,. 1 r-a"�f �•"�'l,��'i"�S{�•t c� "-t'„��°'�• .x•..� s� ;? ¢�-.>�� '' �:... r_ u _ �A )!•r f� w�q �i'„�} 'c��t` r �h y,`<���,'�s ir. ,-----e pl, "�)'• 'a � It x;+! � s r� ,,.)..'f' rT.+"°j�e4.' aV�+`� �n�,�yyy fr ^'sIf y.• s 4� M"��� �r+�.1).1r�i J J+� x v� t'�ry1�4�"?1N vt''44 s Ls•€r m yn 1 �N, `� a' 7 ,,�"YS�.p� «s.y 1�+� �' ' ,� �^'t,`�• �•��,t���� r ) s cup h k s '. _ 4 v- t � ki; .•.* •NF .✓1'f-ai �,t�,. ,..s. r? v�, C: '� Oa'.r''easy ^F Y '+.+ '� 4. `�(. _ � `.1_�7 ky }•.�i .� '3 i C .� ,_ I .! � �t-\ ��. ✓ � !"y •t t'rl�J`I �. .. � ( r',r'.Ah'^7r lkld�C'4C>.' •` } Ical � y, ~ja 1alP w -t , ♦ �. lw �� +t r•♦ r�r�l t " , 1+ ism t' 1�• t I� r 1 A 4,/na /'�. r_ :d . I� -.; .�' •�/...h' � Jt�. ��` �' i `��1 ♦ `,, , J �'„ 1 It t;. .40 ,FA � t � tFl 7 b1.+f •. i �„ - G=..w— •rrs^:. wsy,;f�.3� .11: 9 p �- . a P'W'f'^ r�l �.91R149'L..LLi ! :at �'' •y�. ., _ ''� :a- t7t1� � LHtCN�71G �'«!T ,� � • i 1. a c�•✓_i;,..a� ,L•.R —,'., 1. •r f i •�cmr��3, ••tt r- Eld - -- DOloom fir• — 77 _ _ �.�•-.."..�T•�c.+.. b T 1 yr LL w^, :.A' 1, •� ��•1 �. �- _ :ft,.. �• f'� 'mot ���;, . !. �rf.�•_'. f k AS Pill ,a `•r,}GF72ii�s��..L. 77"•71 r'SkilwrB�iFr�ofi�z,a,.1.S-- j"�I��':�-SN }�-r.st..+`...._�E.'1��''i• J n:�r.�,-_• 7 t Y� •� MP - s r ' ^P' •� ..• .' . _` '� � —fir;-� ��! �:� '-. •ii�� J. , �� e•;�.- .r• ��' .. ('`_ .. - .,^J.�i ••® �,'., a.:r -fk El ry, t-r��eYtim..ti• Nil 777:- MA ..l.l 1... Y.41%F1,. •.T mt:4dM:ut, 377g111f,71�t'+i�!1��'°�",tea X'�y'��da�a«.+�t.2:.:w..ro,+r.....�._.�...- -' - -'. � 1_•. .:. ._ -,l•�_, f �1 � � � � , � 1 � �� � � �, � . �� � � � \ �� �. � � \ � � � ��, � � \ � � � �; � � �. ` ` �� � � � � � \ � ` � � ♦ ` � , . � � ,\ � \ \ \ � � � � � t �. � � � � •. �� � � � \ � � � � � '� � � �` \� � \ \ � � \ � �` � � � \ � �� � � \ \ ` ` `1 � y \ ` \ \ J b " � t f , ♦ � I j t V 1 • V t .i � I r\�\\. y � " i • I 1w ' Connie Brockway,City Clerk _ Cityof Huntington Beach �NGTON s ��`�`'� 9 Office of the City Clerk PRESORT �� y P.O. Box 190 — --- _— I x ` NOV1431-- C' cz t`` Huntington Beach,CA 92648 FIRST CLASS MAIL �- ;? IV :�R-� � CALIF .T R7G1572 + e R8�2,0��cau ey9 ry 9351 -rot 937-19-132 M.rvans /� 19351 Seahorse Ln. #21 INGT°y� ° I 1 Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 F RP 41 BOUNTY cap LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 1141����1 Il+li��+1,�11�sllttl,i�lt,ltl�lltl�tll,�+li s Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach //G oN BF 50 -us�Os-k PRESORT Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 p R T �a iSS NOV 14 51 r�- Huntington Beach,CA 92648 CAL 1 f I rv;E �e R V ® , f 731572 + n 4. G.Newton F�RwARD EXp�REO 10 avocado Ave.TINGT°iy� � Corona Del Mar,Ca.82625 I �O_\NCORPOgq Jfo F 25-11 l-50REIN I Wlp ,£ oIJ I� a -o QZ � W /A - --- -- -COUNTY �'P------LEGAL-NOTICE --PUBLIC-HEARING------ - - Connie Brockway,City Clerk ��'' u•� .rm•�-=- =�r.�. . ......,., ,. �� City of Huntington Beach r/� BF u.s.Fosai;�'�� `� ?:r PRESORT Office of the City Clerk �T 9n NOV 14 91 z r`�z � i a ? Ind P.O.Box,90 r 1RST CLASS PAAIE Huntington Beach,CA 92648 ��r \� 1701572 [yE1F1'J ..r:d .�.... 74. Whit v 7675 Clay v e. I Runtingt n Beach,Ca.92648 TINGTpy 159-34 11 ju ni - - _ - P:u 1 r1AW, IRI) IrtR0�8 0 LE %N T 1 CP`\ LEGAL NOTICE — PUBLIC HEARING Connie Brockway,City Clerk ---••� _...�,_.....,._ Cityof Huntington Beach ON e ,1 g PRESORT Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 NOV 141 S MAIL Huntington Beach,CA 92648 FIRST CLASS L ! ME E q— ! M} -. i. e �,z,,•' ® 88. De Crognale 1( a + P.O. ox 5446 I� •A empted no 1 n y- V[ — Cars n,Ca.90749 �..,InsufficientAd ressr h °cell 1-25 1 _v r •• .Moved left No Add(m% OR P , TINGTp ...._Forw'rding Order Expired Q ORq � /� ///Y�� C=1 _ — LEGAL NOTICE — PUBLIC HEARING ___,ram-..�.aa....r+ler .._ .. 4w......«.w._.:.«..xl�....._..r.aY'.m""�"'.'^ �r"e"i.v"'�i....::.....:arWw..wti•.. r .•,�w��w`��a' cy—,_�.�" -_ - IN, Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach PRESORT p R t1 T �: `., i� Office of the City Clerk /� I� 1"R E S O 1'f, i ��= 9n =x=' - 1•ice q "1 ! 1�C CC MAIL pp =LIC4 9tI. '' i G � ,P.O. Box 190 ����� �N.J�SJ 1r1At� �Huntington Beach,CA 9264ti �, 1 FR'��;I S R2 R 937-19-134 fit/ f 1 ra f� l J.Carrow r IINGTOy SENDER •7� 19351 Seahorse Ln. #204 O CUR►ONNt f �y ��RWgq Iluntington Beach,Ca.92648 s t7 C'TPIN 0 cF c40N T Y CP`\� ' LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ��, ,,,, , ,��,,, „I�„�,,,1,��1��1�►����Itill 1111i . I i • e Connie Brockway,City Clerk ,.,.....,. .,..•.W...,.�...-.., _ .......,. - .... un� �,Y ;,✓v. City of Huntington Beach PRESORT Office of the City Clerk t NOV 14 91 P.O. Box 190 VIRST CLASSt Huntington Beach,CA 92646 \A F `F ai E r E R ; 40. J. Boyce 2625 -A Del Way Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 N NGTpy� 25-063-20 6` Sif;M UN PtlHq �O �� 5, C:v- Rag a 9y `lk, tflb I leiQ cF�OaNTy cP��� LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ypp µµ `•�.�tinal.'i�i�l44i1;:ii/ f•SfpftYii,?�l+Z;1a`9.1;i'k�iFf��, 'r• Connie Brockway,City Clerk 'u.s � AGK.i •; City of Huntington Beach HOW R f Office of the City Clerk CLASS 11 �1 tt NOV 14 B f P.O.Box190IRST 6 �Ib is Huntington Beach,CA 92648 CA "'' ' a r CAL I "'pt572 86.D. Santucci 9F. 19240 Iluntiiigton St. q Huntington Beach,Ca.9 159-341-23 �NTINGTp _9 *41 yo9 ` �'� `(�' ;:•F• '1 i C'r'_•` �.�f].t r...4 � �!.'.'.i_t i..i..'iYbL I'i .i.w•�f'�.•.'�• .1.� �WP y4�. � l�:Cr.T�.t { IN UNABLE TO FORWARD FILE 9�V1. `fB �1 I909.PO• ((O` . BOUNTY ca LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach PRESORT NOV 14 yl x ! � Office of the City Clerk P.O.Box190 FIRST CLASS MAIL E` 1 - �+ TER-' • ' Huntington Be ach,CA 92648 \` CAL If F g 7015 7 2 f 937-19-086 D.Stockwell ro JHuntington 9311 Sunray Ln.#103SENUE► Beach,Ca.92648 ,* INGIpN Q Qa` c`��ouNTv ca�� LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ItIII Is till III,,oil ►it,►t��It�+�t+st«t�t�tt�r��Itrt Connie Brockway,City Clerk RESOR City of Huntington Beach e T Office of the City Clerk f ` i= NOV 14 91 s !" It P.O.Sox 190 � FIRST CLASS t, �t Huntington Beach,CA 92648 1 ta` l�` CAL 1 F �'; 1'r g�01512 1 M. 9221 elware r�q un ngton Beach,C T° o -341-02 low INGTpy� w s } � ;� ,Q � Z F�avNTI ���� LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING Connie Brockway,City Clerk T �I urv� ,i PRESORT S®R [ �� of �1s ,� U.S POs,nGri .x City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk tr NOV 14 01 r W P.O.Box 190 FIRST CLASS MA yL Huntington Beach,CA 92M CAL f• F.c E015 R, R � 937-19-064 OF M I. Mc Kinley U/y4- 51 Sunray Ln. #104 t r�. f 5 tington Beach,Ca.92648 `t EN['tE{� INGTpy� !'RFD fir 9yC� gayit,�o'•�O ��QQ £AUNTY cq� LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING It+I,+++1+i+11„,1,+11++1++Ii„+1++1++1+11+,1,+„I It _„�, - _...._. ram,,-- --,.ram _ ••-.- _ .....� Connie Brockway,City Clerk /�NGTOH .lp•....tea.--=~���J Df- �� U.S.rOSTA9..City of Huntington Beach ) PRES©RTlOffice of the City Clerk �/ \ N ? �P.O.Box190 QQQ FIRST CLASS MAIL ` 1 " _ 1''Huntington Beach,CA 92648 1 \ F;N\ � a7015.2 '937-19-066 W.Harden 19351 Sunray Ln. #105 I . I ( , `luntington Beach,Ca.92648 Al TING SENDER o Q 4 0 - - Z c�ppUNTI CP��� LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 11,1,,,,I,I.►I,,,I„11+,t„II,,,I++1„I,II,,1,,,,111 .- R....,e.,c.r ..r,,...m...........,..�.,..... \NG 1'Uj4" i ` .�!'�:_l Connie Brockway,City Clerk 1,, e Gcms `} US POS7A .� ^Mww City of Huntington Beach PRESORT Office of the City Clerk NOV 14 yl �!z.i Lf P.O.Box 190 FIRST CLASS MAK f Huntington Beach,CA 92648 ,` �n +F' •- 1 oTi Rz ' " 49. L. Allaire RETU� 612 -D Del Way Er4 ro '"o untington Beach, SEMO fA 5-063-32 INGTpy O�_`MG011►OR�rFp �CA � �� i! 1^` C cFppuNTY ca��` LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING it,►,,,,t,t,tt„,t,,�i„t„it,,,t„tlt,,,i„t,,,ll,t City Clerk PRESORT Connie Brockway, �= JS' �'� 'City of Huntington BeachNO 'a ,��1RST C�.�SS MAILOffice of the City Clerk �E.^�' 'P.O.Box 190 c --. Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Er(�� 50. F. Cuff f 0 ro ''0 2606 - A Del Way sTv �o 4 Steft 0 Huntington Beach,Ca. NSINGTp � tpOt 25-063-33 *D� . J p`t—`Moe►as,r�, F•yy ��l 9 Q c`��pu ty Gay` LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING tt,t,,,,t,t,tt,,,t„tit„t„tt,,,t„ttt,,,t,t,,,,t►t N Connie Brockway,City Clerk ...� ..,A..,.., �...,. .�.,� ..., v�•�_. , City of Huntington Beach �� e� IV _ ,u.s.pos�ac�Ty� * Office of the City Clerk PRESORT �z� 9i r -- P.O.Box 190 FIRST CLASS MAIL Noy 14 y! }'^• Huntington Beach,CA 92648 i y ! �r METER UAL If F9701572 • 937-19--105 D.Adam NE 7552 Seaspring Dr.. #101i , INGtpy Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 Q� =0t011►00.17f �� \ y aRa X `1 LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING �4 II+++1++I+++1111+fit H++l Connie Brockway' y Cit Clerk ""� - �•-• �.. ... - �` �NG�'oiy 9 `r City of Huntington Beach C c T , u.5.ros AGEi1�;..; Office of the City Clerk I i PRESORT 3 ! /2;2 P.O.Box,90 FIRST CLASS I� ��1 NOV14 yl z i� �c Huntington Beach,CA 92648 f J UAL If �_. _ ► FQ O15i2 " • 34. L. Richard 2615 Delaware St. " rtF oq Fo • �Fiuntingtin BeacFy • f 1G j �pNTINGTpy ,.� SENDER 157063-07 , #r ' JT O`� =ht01110R�t�O �F �Q j •'�►f'j tin. H ,� rNTY �'Mp� i for 7� I rneI R inrinr nl City Clerk PRESORT Connie Brockway, y (_ , City of Huntington Beach ; NOV 14 91 �i M7i115R7# office Of the City Clerk � FISTLSS M11 P.O.Box 190 "l �C" f Huntington Beach,CA 92648 .� I 28. L.Cox 41 4 ro 2623—D Delware St. �H sFtioFq Huntington Deach,Ca.9264 41r4-0t 25-063-01 'ING � v O Z cp���o PUBLIC HEARING stttt,,,ttt,tt,,,tt,tt,lt�,,,su ouNTI LEGAL NOTICE - r..s., w ._ .,s.,,,. .......,.......-..-,.. _..may. .. . ... .. .. ...._.w........._...,... .. . ... .. .... ,, .. _ +w-�-,. �GTON— Connie Brockway,City Clerk a � ~ us.sasTncr�i=�� PRSQRT �City of Huntington Beach 1�� '� c- Office of the City Clerk P.O.BOX 190 FIRST CLASS MAIL ('Fkl E T E rt'Huntington Beach,CA 92W L a:. o sr2 " c��_I},.t >J 025-062-01 CC So Cal 88 Assoc SON CHECKED 04-001. 22 W Commonwealth Unc aimed Refused Alhambra, a 91803 �r Address Unknown INGTp, Insufficient Address No Such Street tuber O iMt91,f011a��o 9 Vacant _ - -- .---�-+-- No Moil Receptacle --. �,1NSTLIUFR F-RETUSN '� IRE ITO SENDER TO SE� i c'EA nFT ': RI VT T LEGAL NOTICEUr- 4 s �