Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZone Change 91-4 - Negative Declaration 91-26 - Public Heari CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CONNIE BROCKWAY CITY CLERK October 29, 1992 Nfr. Olaf Smildzins Peninsula Pump and Equipment 7511 Warner Avenue Huntington Beach CA 92647 On August 17, 1992 the Huntington Beach City Council, following a public hearing on Zone Change 92-2, approved the first reading of Ordinance 3164. The ordinance was adopted on September 8, 1992 and became effective on October 8, 1992. I have enclosed a certified copy of the ordinance (number 3164) for your records. When the minutes for the meeting of September 8, 1992 have been approved by Council, we will send you a copy. Connie Brockway, City Clerk CB/kw Enclosures (Telephone:714-536-5227) STATE OF CAUFORNIA County of Orange I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the below entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the HUNTINGTON BEACH . INDEPENDENT, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Huntington Beach, County of OrcAnge, State of —OUBUC NOTICE California, and that attached Notice is a true and LEGAL NOTICE complete copy as was printed and published in °NO.31164 the Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley THEACITY OFJCE HN NTING- TON BEACH AMENDING issues of said newspaper to wit the issue(s) of: THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 9061 THEREOF 'TO PROVIDE FOR CHANGE OF ZONING FROM "MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL" TO "LIM- ITED MANUFACTURING". ON REAL PROPERTY GEN- September 17 , 1992 ERALLY LOCATED ON .17 NET ACRES ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WARNER AVENUE -AND LYNDON STREET" (ZONE CHANGE 92-2) SYNOPSIS: Ordinance No. 3164 amends the City of Huntington Beach Ordi- nance Code by amending Section 9061 to changelthe zoning on real property generally located oni.<the northwest corner of Warner Avenue and Lyndon S.tmet from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing). —8 THE FULL TEXT OF-'THE ORDINANCE IS AVAIL- ABLE IN THE CirTY CLERK'S OFFICE 1T I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the . ADOPTED by thety Council of the City of.Hun- foregoing is true and correct tington Beach at an regular meeting held Monday;jS!ep- tember 8, 1992,by the.fol- Executed on- Se tember 199 2 lowing roll call vote: ,1q 17 ' _P AYES: Councllm'em• bars: Robitaille, Silva, at Costa Mes NOES: Council , California MacAllister,Kelly, / bars: Moulton- Patterson, Wincfiell, Green Signature ABSENT: Coun'C'll- members:None CITY OF HUNTING- TON BEACH, Connie Brockway,City Clerk- Published Huntington Beach.Fountain Valley In- idependent;September 17, 1992. 09.-258 PROOF OF PUBLICATION • CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION 14UNIINGTON BEACH To Sarah Lazarus From Connie Brockwav, Cite Clerk C� Subject C-1 - PUBLIC HEARING Date 8/3/92 (Peninsula Pump) ZC 92-2 Continued to 8/17/92 At last night's Council meeting (8/3/92) , the Council asked staff if it was the City that is the applicant instead of Mr. Smildgens and staff stated that the City was the applicant. Do you suggest that I publish a correct version? If so, is it necessary to renotify by mailing. Please respond today so that I can get it done in time for the 8/17/92 meeting. CB:bt CC: Gail Hutton, City Attorney f REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION August 3 , 1992 Date Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrat Prepared by: Michael Adams, Director of Community Developmen Subject: ZONE CHANGE NO.���922-2/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-26 -h F1171-fj— e//:P/9 3�G J4 Consistent with Council Policy? [-} Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception 04 lot .3 Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions, Attachments: pl� STATEMENT OF ISSUE: /tom q�=c�0-4- . Transmitted for City Council consideration is a request to change the zoning on a 7, 500 square foot parcel of property located at 5711 Warner Avenue from Medium Density Residential to Limited Manufacturing. This request was approved by the City Council on July 6, 1992 . However, due to inadequate public notification, it is necessary to reschedule. The renotification for this request does comply with the code. RECOMMENDATION• Staff Recommendation: Motion to: "Approve Negative Declaration No. 91-26 and deny Zone Change No. 92-2 with findings . " (See Attachment No. 2 for Suggested Findings for Denial) Planning Commission Recommendation: Motion to: "Approve Negative Declaration No. 91-26 and Zone Change No. 92-2 with findings by adopting Ordinance No. 3164 which would rezone the property generally located at 5711 Warner Avenue from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) . " (See Attachment No. 3 for Planning Commission action and Suggested Findings for Approval . ) 1 C � PIO 5/85 ANALYSIS• Public Notification: Staff has agendized this item because incorrect public hearing notification labels were provided to staff for the July 6, 1992 City Council meeting. The incorrect labels resulted in thirty-six (36) property owners within the required 300 foot notification radius not being notified. Staff has corrected the notification labels . Proiect Description: This application is a request to rezone an approximately 7, 500 square foot parcel from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) . The current use of the property is a legal non-conforming industrial use, (Peninsula Pump and Equipment) . Current zoning allows only health and safety improvements to the property such as new roofing or driveways or, through a conditional use permit, an expansion of no more than 10%. The applicant proposes to demolish the existing structure on the site and construct a new industrial structure in its place. Since the current zoning and general plan designation on the site is residential and the applicant proposes more than minor modifications to the property, a zone change is required for the proposed new construction. ' This Zone Change Request was processed earlier this year and the vote by the City Council resulted in a denial due to a lack of a majority vote (see Attachment No. 4) . The City Council directed staff to initiate a new zone change application for this site. The Planning Commission approved the zone change request on May 5, 1992 . General Plan Consistency: Typically, a general plan amendment would be required in conjunction with a zone change in order to achieve consistency between the City' s General Plan and zoning designation. A general plan amendment is not necessary in this case, however, as the City' s General Plan exempts properties less than one (1) acre in area from the zoning/general plan consistency requirement. The subject site is approximately one-sixth (1/6) of an acre in size. Permitted Uses • The current zoning on the site R2-Medium Density Residential would permit a maximum of three (3) residential dwelling units . The proposed zoning would permit general industrial uses . The applicant has submitted conceptual plans of what they propose to construct on the site. Although the plans submitted by the applicant are not the subject of this application, staff has performed a preliminary review and determined that the plans, with a few modifications, could conform to the proposed Ml-Limited Manufacturing development standards . If the zone change request is approved, the specific development request will require review by the Zoning Administrator through the parcel map and administrative review application process . Lot Size• The property currently consists of two (2) lots which have a net area of approximately 7, 500 square feet. Generally, the minimum lot size for M1 properties is 10, 000 square feet; however, smaller lot sizes are permitted if the parcel map is processed in conjunction with an administrative review to the Zoning Administrator. The purpose of this requirement is to allow the City to determine if the proposed improvements on the property can be adequately accommodated on the smaller lot size. If the City Council approves this zone change request, however, they would be making the determination that the smaller lot size is acceptable for an industrial use at this subject location. Adjacent Land Uses : The use of the properties within the immediate vicinity on the north side of Warner Avenue is generally multi-family residential with a few single-family dwellings . The condition of the housing varies to a large degree with many deteriorating properties as well as numerous new residential structures in the area. Directly to the north of the subject property, several new multi-family residential structures are under construction. Staff Concerns: Given the residential land use within the immediate vicinity, staff has three major concerns regarding rezoning the property for industrial use: 1. Truck traffic to the site would be via Lyndon Street, a street designed to residential standards . Residential streets have a curb to curb width of 40 feet. After required dedications, Lyndon Street will have a curb to curb width of 40 feet. Typically, the City has required streets serving industrial uses to have a curb to curb width of 44 feet. Therefore, the proposed street will be 4 feet less in width than what is usually required to serve an industrial use. 2 . Noise created by truck traffic and as a result of an industrial use on the site may be detrimental to the residential properties within the vicinity of the property. As discussed above, the residential properties in the immediate vicinity of the property are in the process of recycling. For example, the two (2) properties directly adjacent to the property under consideration for the zone change have new duplexes on them. Staff is concerned that the intensification of the industrial use at the subject location may stunt or halt the recycling of the properties underway in the vicinity. It should be noted that while the current industrial use does not appear to negatively impact the residential properties, nothing would prevent the property from being sold or leased to a more typical industrial use that may be less compatible with the nearby residences . 3 . Although properties have been rezoned by the City from a conforming general plan designation to a non-conforming designation in the past, the new use was always within the same general classification (i .e. , R1 to R2) . The City has never rezoned a property that conformed to the general plan to a completely different classification (i .e. , residential to industrial) . Summary: Although approval of the subject zone change would provide a "quick fix" to the property by allowing the property owner to demolish a blighted tin structure and replace it with a more attractive building, staff believes that approval of the zone change request would, in the long term, be detrimental to the residential properties in the vicinity. The concept of permitting non-conforming uses to exist is based on the eventual recycling of the property to a conforming use. Staff believes that since the useful life of the structure has expired, the use of the property should be brought into conformance with the current zoning and general plan designations on the property. FUNDING SOURCE: Not applicable ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Motion to: "Approve Negative Declaration No. 91-26 and Zone Change No. 92-2 with findings . " ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance No. 2 . Suggested Findings for Denial (Staff recommendation) 3 . Findings and Conditions of Approval (Planning Commission recommendation) 4 . January 6, 1992 City Council minutes 5 . Applicant ' s Narrative 6 . Draft Negative Declaration No. 91-26 7. Planning Commission Staff Report dated May 5, 1992 with conceptual site plan, floor plan and elevations MTU:MA:TR: jr ATTACHMENT 2 STAFF SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - ZONE CHANGE NO, 92-2 1. The proposed zone change from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) does not conform with the land use designation of Medium Density Residential which permits only residential uses . 2 . The proposed zone change from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) is inconsistent with surrounding residential land uses . All other properties on Lyndon Street have a residential use. Additionally, duplexes are currently under construction on the parcels directly to the north of the site. 3 . The proposed zone change from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Industrial) would be incompatible with the adjacent residential properties to the north and east. Noise associated with industrial uses on the site as well as the potential truck traffic would be detrimental to the residential properties. (1362D-5) ATTACHMENT NO. L- ATTACHMENT 3 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION AND FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ON MAY 5, 1992: ON A MOTION BY LEIPZIG AND SECOND BY KIRKLAND, THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-26 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: NEWMAN, RICHARDSON, SHOMAKER, DETTLOFF, LEIPZIG, KIRKLAND, BOURGUIGNON NOES: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE ABSENT: NONE ON MOTION BY LEIPZIG AND SECOND BY KIRKLAND, THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED ZONE CHANGE NO. 92-2 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: NEWMAN, SHOEMAKER, LEIPZIG, KIRKLAND, BOURGUIGNON NOES: RICHARDSON, DETTLOFF ABSTAIN: NONE ABSENT: NONE FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - ZONE CHANGE NO, 92-2: 1. Although proposed zone change from R2- M1 does not conform with the Land Use Element of the General Plan, the site is less than an acre and is exempt from the zoning/general plan consistancy requirement. 2 . The proposed zone change from R2 to M1 is consistent with the existing use of the property and is compatible with adjacent land uses . CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - ZONE CHANGE NO 92-2 : 1. A tentative parcel map application in conjunction with an administrative review application shall be submitted to the City for review of the development of the site. Approval of Zone Change No. 92-2 does not imply approval of the conceptual plan submitted as a part of the zone change application. 2. Any future development of the site shall be subject to the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code and Huntington Beach Municipal Code. (1362D-6) ATTACHMENT NO. - Page 5 - Council/Agency Minutes - 1 /6/92 (City Council) PUBLIC HEARING - ZONE CHANGE NO. 91-4 - APPEAL DENIED - NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-26 - INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 3129 - FAILED - OLAF SMILDZINS - 7511 WARNER AVE (450.20) The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing to consider the following: APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No. 91-4 Negative Declaration No. 91-26 APPLICANT: Olaf Smildzins (Peninsula Pump) LOCATION: 7511 Warner Avenue ZONE: R2 (Medium Density Residential ) RE UEST: Rezone a 7,438 square foot (net) parcel of real property from R2 (Medium Density Residential ) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) . ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No. 91-26 has been prepared and advertised for a 21 day public comment period which expired on September 24, 1991 . This Negative Declaration will also be considered by Council . COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable The City Clerk presented Ordinance No. 3129 for Council approval - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 9061 THEREOF TO PROVIDE FOR CHANGE OF ZONING FROM 'MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL' TO ' LIMITED MANUFACTURING' ON REAL PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WARNER AVENUE AND LYNDON STREET (ZONE CHANGE NO. 91-4) ." Legal notice as provided to the City Clerk' s Office by staff had been mailed, published, and posted. No communications or written protests were received on the matter. Mike Adams, Community Development Director, presented a staff report using slides. The Mayor declared the public hearing open. Mark Rogers, J.L.A. Planning, Inc. , representing applicant; spoke in support of Zone Change No. 91-4 and stated he was present to answer questions. There being no one present to speak further on the matter and there being no protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor. Discussion was held by Council . Mr. Rogers answered Councilmember Kelly' s questions. A motion was made by Winchell , seconded by Moulton-Patterson, to approve Negative Declaration No. 91-26 and deny Zone Change No. 91-4 with findings for denial as set forth in Attachment No. 1 of the RCA dated January 6, 1992. The motion FAILED by the following roll call vote: AYES: Moulton-Patterson, Winchell , Green NOES: Silva, MacAllister, Kelly ABSENT: Robitaille pe%,Aem moowr A q .; F Page 6 - Council/Agency Minutes - 1/6/92 RECESS - RECONVENE The Mayor called a recess of the Council meeting at 9:15 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 9:30 p.m. ACTION CONTINUED ON: (City Council) PUBLIC HEARING - ZONE CHANGE NO. 91-4 - NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-26 - INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 3129 - OLAF SMILDZINS - 7511 WARNER AVE (450.20) The City Attorney reported that the City Charter requires four votes to approve an ordinance. She read into the record the portion of the Council manual pertaining to approval of ordinances. A motion was made by MacAllister, seconded by Kelly, to return the item pertaining to Zone Change No. 91-4 to Council on January 21 , 1992 as a report of the potentiality of a Zone Change Action on behalf of the City Council . There was no action taken based on the following roll call tie vote: AYES: Silva, MacAllister, Kelly NOES: Moulton-Patterson, Winchell , Green ABSENT: Robitaille I%ILS�IEOA Council PUBLIC HEARING - DEFERRED TO 1/21/92 - APPEAL OF PLANNING'S APPROVAL OF CUP NO. 91-39 WITH SPECIAL PERMITS - CDP NO. 91-21 - CE NO. 91-45 - TPM NO. 91-235 - DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. NW CORNER MAIN/PCH - ABDELMUTI DEVELOPMENT CO. (420.40) The Mayor iounced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing to consider the o lowing appeal : APPLICATION NUM' R: Conditional Use Permit No. 91-39 with Special Permits Coastal Developmen ermit No. 91-21 - Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 91-45 - Tentative P rcel Map No. 91-235 - Draft Environmental Impact Report No. 89-6 APPLICANT: City of Hun imgton Beach Redevelopment Agency/Lang Lampert Architects APPELLANT: Lang Lampert Architec bdelmuti Development Co. LOCATION: 101 Main Street (Northwest' orner of Main Street at Pacific Coast Highway) ZONE: Downtown Specific Plan No. 3-Visitor S;e ing Commercial REQUEST: To permit the construction of a 48;06� square foot four (4) story commercial/office building with special permits site coverage, upper story setbacks and adherence to the five (5) foot builds-line. The proposal also includes a 141 space parking and one (1 ) loading spat=e 'ariance. APPEAL: The appellant is appealing the specific 'C-1-�1 tion of approval (Condition #1 ) which requires that the proposed tower her. be lowered four (4) feet from 89 feet to 85 feet and the requirement that `a� mAni mum four (4) foot upper story setback shall be provided along the two (2)`�s eer walls on Main Street and Pacific Coast Highway from the second floor *cade to the third floor facade. � 6 J.L. Webb Planning, Inc. 400 2900 Bristol Street, Suite F102, Costa Mesa CA 92626 (714) 557-3707 Land Planning • Landscape Architecture Urban Design July 26, 1991 City of Huntington Beach Department of Community Development 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 This zone change request IS for the 0�8-acre parcel owned by Peninsula Pump and EgL1ipn1erlt Inc. We are requesting that the zoning be changed from R-2 (medium density residential) to M-1 (general industrial). The property is located on Warner Avenue in the City of 141-111tington Beach. The area borders a large 'Nl-I district and an R-2 area. Spe.cifically,the. property is bounded on the west by the Pacific Electric railroad tracks, and adjacent to the tracks on the west is an area of general industi i I] development. Directly to the north and to the east of the subject property is medium density residential development. "I'o the South of the property is general industrial devclopnlent. There currently exists a small structure on one lot of the parcel. This structure is not in conformance with the City's zoning because the widening of Warner A%-ellue resulted in its location on a right-of-way line. The mvner proposes to construct a concre[e block bUildlllh on the other lot of this parcel. The existing structure will be demolished and re.piaccd by a parking lot landscaped in conformance with the design guidelines for TNI-1 uses. The purpose of both the existing and the proposed building is the warehouse storage of pumps for d-:livery and installation. Ifnank you for your attention to this application. Sir.c--re.ly, Michael J. Bernhardt Project Manager 0 CLD:kjh 9102-8 �f'���H r: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINCTON BEACH To Tom Rogers From Julie sugi Assistant Planner Assi t nt Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT August 29, 1991 Subject FORM NO. 91-26 Date Applicant: Olaf Smildens Request: A zone change of an approximately 8,100 square foot area from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Light Industrial). No development is proposed at this time. Subsequent development will be subject to a minimum of Tentative Parcel Map and Administrative Review approval and therefore will require additional review. Location: 7511 Warner Avenue (Northside of Warner Avenue between Lyndon and Gothard Streets) Background Staff has reviewed the environmental assessment form noted above and has determined that a negative declaration may be filed for the project. In view of this, a draft negative declaration was prepared and was published in the Daily Pilot for a twenty--one (21) day public review period commencing Tuesday, September 3, 1991 and ending Tuesday, September 24, 1991 . If any comments regarding the draft negative declaration are received, you will be notified immediately. Recommendation The Environmental Assessment Committee recommends that the Planning Commission approve Negative Declaration No. 91-26 finding that the proposed project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment. JO:lp (0620d-2) <oa LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Notice is hereby given by the Department of Community Development, Planning Division of the City of Huntington Beach that the following Draft Negative Declaration requests have been prepared and will be submitted to the City of Huntington Beach Planning Commission for their consideration. The draft negative declarations will be avaiiable for public review and comment for twenty-one (21) days commencing Tuesday, September 3, 1991 . Draft Negative Declaration No. 91 -19 in conjunction with Conditional Use Permit No. 91-1 is a request to construct a 20, 185 sq. ft. expansion to an existing 5,720 sq. ft. church. The expansion consists of a 405 seat 11 ,850 sq. ft. new church, 7,230 srl. ft. of new classroom/adminstrative area, 100 sq. ft. of storage area, and a 1 , 105 sq. ft. addition to the new parish hall. The he project also includes a request for Join, part:ing :nd a special permit to allow a max 20% compact parking stalls. l he c:h,:rch is ocati d at 18631 Chapel Lane. Draft Negative Declaration No. 91-26 in conjunction with Zone Change ,N,o. 91- 1 is a request to amend the zoning on approximately 8,100 square foot area frog: R2 (?Medium Density Residential) to Ml (Light Industrial). No development is prcfsed at t )is time. The site is located at 7511 Warner Avenue. Copies of these requests are on file with the Depar;nlent of Cnr-n:M.rnit . 1�c��lopn:ent City of Huntington Beach, 2000 "lain Street, Huntington Beach, Ca1,foi-ia 1r:, {person wishing to comment on these requests rrray do so in writing within PAenty-one (21 ) days of this notice by providing written comments to the Department of Comn,unity Development, Planning Division, P.O. Box 190, Huntington Beach, C-A 926,+8. (0626d) Cob ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEAACH PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 91-26 1 . Name of Propo ent: Olaf Smildens Address : 7511 Warner Avenue Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Phone Number: (714) 848-8395 2. Date Checklist Submitted for Review: August 28, 1991 3. Concurrent Entitlement(s .: Zone Change No. 91-4 4. Pro ect Location: 7511 Warner Avenue (Northside of Warner Avenue between Lyndon and Gothard Streets) 5. Project Description: A zone change of an approximately 8, '._-0 square foot area from R2 (Medium Density Residential ) to HI (Lig`.: Industrial ) . No development is proposed at this. time. development will be subject to a minimum of Tentative Parc_, Map and Administrative Review approval and therefore will require »ditional review. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of answers are included after each subsect'on. ) Yes M�-Ybe No 1 . Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or changes in geologic substructures? — Y. _ b. Disruptions, displacements , compaction or overcovering of the soil? X Discussion: The project does not consist of any development at this time. Subsequent development, under the proposed zoning may result is some disruption, displacement, compaction and overcovering of soil . However, impacts associated with the disruption, displacement, compaction and overcovering of soil are not anticipated to be substantially different from those associated with development under existing zoning. Furthermore, soils impacts of future development will be project specific and will be addressed through the entitlement process. Future development will also be subject to standard conditions of approval which require submittal of a soils study and implementation of specifications contained therein; no significant impacts to earth conditions are anticipated to result from the proposed project. loc Yes Maybe No C. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? _ X d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? — X Discussion: The project site is primarily flat and does not contain any unique physical features. Any changes in topography proposed by subsequent development will be project specific and will be addressed through the entitlement process . e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? X Discussion: The project does not include any development at this time. Subsequent development of the site may result in short-'erm wind erosion impacts during the site preparation and construction phases . However, subsequent development will be subject to standard conditions of approval requiring implementation of dust control measures ; no significant impact is anticipated. f. Changes in deposition or- erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deeosition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? _X g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes , lands'' ;es , mudslides , ground failure, or similar hazards? _ X_ Discussion: The project is not located in the vicinity of the Alquist-Priolo Spe-' • Hazard -.one or- any other known fault hazard; however: the site is located in an area of potential e aa-sive soils as identified in the City's 1974 Geotechnical Inputs report. The proposed project does not consist of any ceveloprienL at this time. However, subsequent development will be subject to standard conditions c' approval which require submittal of soils reports and implementation of measures contained therein; no significant impacts are anticipated. 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X_ Discussion: Short Term: The proposed project does not consist of any development a; this tirr,e. Ilowever, subsequent development under the proposed zoning may result short-term emissions fro-: construction equipment and grading activities . Short-term dust and pollutant emissions are not anticipated to be substantially different from those generated by development under the existing zoning. Subsequent development will be subject to standard conditions of approval requiring implementation of dust control measures and restriction of construction activities during second stage smog alerts and high ozone days . No significant impact is anticipated. Long Term: Subsequent development and operation of industrial uses on the site may result in emissions due to vehicle traffic and equipment/processes used on site. However, vehicle emissions resulting from subsequent development are not anticipated to be substantial ; future occupants of the site will be subject to standard conditions of approval which require prospective occupants to provide information on equipment/processes which may generate air pollutants to the South Coast Air Quality Management District for review and approval prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. No significant impacts are anticipated. b. The creation of objectionable odors? X Discussion: No development is proposed at this time. Industrial land uses, allowed by the proposed zoning, are more likely to generate fumes or odors than the multi-family uses allowed under the current zoning. The Environmental Checklist � - 7d (052 ), Yes ate No project site is adjacent to multi—family residences to the north and south and adjacent to similar industrial uses to the south and west. However, subsequent development will be subject to additional review through the entitlement process and as discussed above, prospective occupants will be required to obtain SCAQMD approval prior to occupancy. C. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either- locally or regionally? _ _ X 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? is b. Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? X__ Discussion: The project site is currently occupied by a pump storage/repair business and is partially covered by impervious surfaces . No development is proposed at this time. However, subsequent development is anticipated to increase the amount of impervious surfaces on the site and will result in additional runoff from the site. Alternations to drainage patterns and run off resulting from subsequent development will also be project specific and will be addressed through the entitlement process . Subsequent development will be subject to standard conditions of approval requiring submittal of grading and hydraulic studies to insure that development will not adversel; ;moact drainage in the area. No significant impact i, anticinated. C. Alterations to the course or flow c•- f cod waters? . d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? _ X e. Discharge into surface -waters, or in any a': teration of surface water q.,a': ity, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? __. f . Alteration of the direction or- rate of flow of ground waters? is g. Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X Discussion: The proposed zoning is not anticipated to result in a substantial increase in water usage or a significant reduction in the amount of water available to the city. i . Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? _._ _X_ Discussion: The proposed project site is not located in the vicinity of the flood plain or any other water related hazards. 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? X b. Reduction of the numbers of any mature, unique, rare or endangered species of plants? _ X — �O-e Environmental Checklist -3- (0527d) r Yes Maybe No c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? _ X d. Reduction in acreage of an agricultural crop? _ X Discussion (a-d) : The site is currently occupied by a pump storage/repair business and contains 1 mature tree which may have to be removed or relocated to develop site. However, the subsequent development will be subject to standard conditions of approval which require that mature trees be maintained if feasible or replaced at a 2: 1 ratio. No significant impact is anticipated. 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? _ X_ b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? X C. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier- to the migration or movement of animals? y, d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat'. X Discussion (a-d) : The site is occupied by a pump storage/repair business and does not appear to support. any unique animal species . No significant impact is anticipated. 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? X Discussion: Short-term: The project does not consist of any development at this time. However, equipment associated with construction of subsequent development may generate short-term increases in noise during the site preparation and construction phases . However, construction noise impacts resulting from development under the proposed zoning are not anticipated to be substantially different than those resulting from construction under the R2 Zoning. Subsequent development will be subject to standard conditions of approval which limit the hours of construction activities and compliance with the Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance. Long-Term: The project site is located within a 65 CNEL noise contour. The proposed zone change will remove residential zoning from the 65 CNEL. However, proposed zone change will also allow for industrial development adjacent to multi-family residences . The introduction of industrial uses and associated activities (such as truck traffic) is anticipated to increase noise in the project area and may impact residences to the north and east. Noise impacts are anticipated to be project specific and will be addressed through the entitlement process . No significant impacts are anticipated. b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? y, Discussion: See 6a. 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X Discussion: The project does not consist of any development at this time; however subsequent development will result in new light and glare in the project vicinity. Subsequent development will be subject to Environmental Checklist -4- (0527d) Yes Maybe No ♦ A, entitlement and standard conditions of approval which require submittal of a lighting plan to insure that lighting will not spill onto adjacent properties . No significant impact is anticipated. 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? — X _ Discussion: The proposed project is a change in zoning of the property. The existing zoning would allow for development of approximately 4 multi-family residential units. The project proposes amending the zoning on a 8, 100 square foot strip of property from R2 (Medium Density Residential , 15 units/acre) to allow for- industrial development on the site. Although the property is currently occupied by an industrial use, rezoning of the property is anticipated to result in development of more intense industrial uses adjacent to a residential area. The compatibility of the M1 zoning with adjacent uses will be determined by analysis contained in this study and during the zone change review process . q. Natural Resources . Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? __. X_ b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? _^ X 0iscussion (a-b) : No development is proposed at this time. Subsequent replacement of the existing building on the site with new industrial buildings may increase the demand of natural and energy resources . However, the increase usage is not anticipated to be substantial and any impact to the rate of usage or depletion of supplies is anticipated to be negligible. Project specific energy usage impacts will be addressed through the entitlement process . Impacts will be reduced further through implementation of the Energy Conservation Standards in Title 24 of the California Administrative Code as required through standard conditions of approval . 10. risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances ( including, but not limited to oil , pesticides , chemicals or- radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? k._ Discussion: A portion of the site is currently occupied by a pump storage/repair business which will have to be removed in order to develop the site. Subsequent development of the site and removal of the business may require removal of waste fuel/oil tanks and contaminated soils which have the potential to release petroleum products through leakage or spillage. However, cleanup of the project site will be subject to standard conditions of approval which require any oil storage tanks to be removed and the site to be cleaned up in accordance with Fire Department standards . No significant impact is anticipated. b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? _ — X II . Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? X Discussion: The proposed zone change will eliminate development of future housing opportunities on the site. However, the site will provide approximately 4 units which is not considered substantial . The proposed project may provide additional employment opportunities in the city. However, the number of jobs created is not anticipated to be substantial . The potential impacts to the city's growth rate and housing demand is considered negligible. 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? _ — X 40 Environmental Checklist -5- 0 (0527d) Yes Maybe No s-. 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? X Discussion: The proposed project does not consist of any development at this time. Subsequent industrial development, based upon conceptual plans submitted by the applicant, is projected to generate approximately 22 trips with a peak hour trip generation of approximately 3 trips (calculations based upon ITE trip generation rates) . The current zoning to anticipated to allow for development of approximately 4 units and will generate an estimated 24 ADT and 3 peak hour trips . The anticipated change in potential trip generations is negligible. Project specific traffic impacts resulting from subsequent development will be addressed through the entitlement process ; no significant impacts are anticipated. b. Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new off-site parking? X_ Discussion: Subsequent development will be required to comply with Article 960: "Parking and Landscaping" of the City of Huntington Beach Ordinance Code which requires that all parking be accommodated on site. No significant impact is anticipated. c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? X__ Discussion The proposed project does not cc�sist of any development at this time. However, the zone change wi " allow for industrial development ;n the vi--inity of multi-family residential units and has a potential `or generating industrial truck tra-'fic on adjacent residential streets . Project specific circulation impacts w;11 be addressed through the entitlement process . No significant impact is anticipated. d. Alterations to present patterns of circ.;'ation o- movement of people and/or goods? X Discussion: See 13c. e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air- traffic? }:._. f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? X Discussion: The proposed project does not consist of any development at this time. However, subsequent development will result in the presence of construction and industrial truck traffic and may result in increased obstacles to vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians during the construction and operation of industrial uses . Construction related hazards are short-term and are not anticipated to be substantial Furthermore; subsequent development will be subject to standard conditions of approval requiring submittal of a construction vehicle routing plan. Industrial truck use on the site will be dependent on future uses on the site. Project specific traffic impacts will be addressed through the entitlement process . 14. Public Services . Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a. Fire protection? _ X b. Police protection? _ — X C. Schools? X d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X Environmental Checklist -6- (0527d) Yes Maybe P. e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X Discussion: The project site is currently unimproved and will require installation of sidewalk, curb and gutter which will be maintained by the City. However, these improvements are not considered substantial and will not require any additional manpower- or'facilities to serve the proposed project. f. Other governmental services? _ X Discussions (a-d,f) : All public services are currently available for the site. Development under the proposed zoning will not result in a need for any additional fire, police, school , park, public facilities or services . No significant impact is anticipated. 15. Ener-gy. Will the oroposal result in: a. Use of substa-.tial amounts of fuel or energy? _ Discussion: See 9 (a,b) . b. Substantial ,.,crease in demand upon existing source of energy, or require the development of sources of energy? Discussion: See 9 r a,'o.) . 16. Utilities . Will t _ proposal result in a need for- new systems , or substantial alterations to the following ; ties : a. Power or natural aas? b. COMIL)n i c a t 4 or, systems? c. water? d. Sewer or sept'= tanks? e. . Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? Discussion (a-f) : All utilities are currently available in the project vicinity. Subsequent development c•' industrial uses may require installation of connections into existing utility systems ; however, the subsequent development is not anticipated to result in a need for any new systems or substantial alteration; to existing systems to serve the site. 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? _ X b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X 1 Environmental Checklist -7- (0527d) - — Maybe No Discussion: The site does not currently offer any view opportunities and is not anticipated to result in an aesthetically offensive site; no significant impact is anticipated. 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X Discussion: The proposed project site will not impact any recreational opportunities . 20. Cultural Resources . a , Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? X b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? !_ X C. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? X d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? _ X Discussion (a-d) : The proposed project site is not located in the vicinity of any -own archaeological sites . 21 . Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, sub- stantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife soecies , cause a fish or wi' lie population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant ,,r anirnaI community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endancered plan; or animal or eliminate important examples of the major- periods of California histo-y or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-terms, impacts will endure well into the future. ) X C. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively consid- erable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small , but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant. ) X d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X Environmental Checklist -8- , (0527d) DETERMINATION r On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILT_ BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project RAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL _ IMPACT REPORT is required. Date sign re Revised: March, 1990 fir: City of Huntington Beach Corr unity_ Development Department Environmental Checklist _9_ (O527d) u ; 0 0 1600 3100 V 5Ot . ARGOSY c 1 Z � � p, i a Z FO,NG;, irA - ' WARNER J i l7hlb, i '-- -------- -- ---- - 101-c-i li HA J VICINITY MAP HUNTINGTON BEACH P/LAANNING DIVISION "huntington beach department of community development STAf f -REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY MAY 5 . 1992 ZONE CHANGE NO, 92-2/ NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO, 91-26 Zone Change No. 92-2 is a request to rezone a 7,438 square foot parcel from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) . This request was approved by the Planning Commission on October 22, 1991 and denied by the City Council on January 6, 1992 due to a lack of a majority vote. The Council then directed staff to resubmit the zone change as a City application. Peninsula Pump is currently operating on the site as a legal non-conforming use. As in the previous request, staff is recommending denial . If approved, the zone change would result in a parcel that does not meet the minimum 10, 000 square foot lot for a M1 zoned property and the zoning would not be in compliance with the Medium Density Residential land use designation. The zone change would also result in industrial traffic using residential streets and could cause noise, vibration and odors to the residences . The site is located in a neighborhood with low income housing units and if the zone change is approved, the potential for market-rate low income housing at this site will be lost . There are other more suitable sites for Peninsula Pump along Gothard Street that would not require a zone change and that would not negatively impact nearby residences . AOR70 NO#ALL �a A-F M-23C TO: Planning Commission FROM: Community Development DATE: Mal 5, 1992 SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE NO. 92-2/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-26 APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 PROPERTY OWNER: Clarence Victory, 210 Littlefield Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94080 REOUEST: Rezone a 7, 438 net square foot parcel (net) of real property from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) . LOCATION: 7511 Warner Avenue (north side of Warner Avenue on the east side of the Southern Pacific Railroad) DATE ACCEPTED: April 1, 1992 ZONE: R2 (Medium Density Residential) GENERAL PLAN: Medium Density Residential EXISTING USE: Industrial (Legal Non-Conforming) ACREAGE: Approximately 7, 500 square feet 1 . 0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Motion to : "Approve Negative Declaration No . 91-26 and deny Zone Change No . 92-2 with findings and forward to City Council for final determination. " 2 . 0 GENERAL INFORMATION: Zone Change No . 92-2 in conunction with Negative Declaration No. 91-26 is a request to change the zoning on a parcel of property from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) , which will permit the property owner to construct an industrial building on the site. This zone change was previously reviewed by the Planning Commission on October 22, 1991 as Zone Change No. 91-4 . A MOTION WAS MADE BY KIRKLAND, SECOND BY BOURGUIGNON, TO APPROVE ZONE CHANGE NO. 91-4 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-26 WITH FINDINGS AND FORWARD TO CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL DETERMINATION, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Newman, Shomaker, Kirkland, Dettloff, Bourguignon, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: Richardson ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED The City Council denied Zone Change No. 91-4 at the January 6, 1992 meeting due to lack of a majority vote. A MOTION WAS MADE BY WINCHELL, SECONDED BY MOULTON-PATTERSON, TO APPROVE NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-26 AN DENY ZONE CHANGE NO. 91-4 WITH FINDINGS FOR DENIAL AS SET FORTH IN ATTACHMENT NO. 1 OF THE RCA DATED JANUARY 6, 1992 . THE MOTION FAILED BY THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES : Moulton-Patterson, Winchell, Green NOES: Silva, MacAllister, Kelly ABSENT: Robitaille ACTION CONTINUED ON: (City Council) PUBLIC HEARING - ZONE CHANGE NO. 91-4 - NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-26 - INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO 3129 - OLAF SMILDZINS - 7511 WARNER AVE (450 . 20) The City Attorney reported that the City Charter requires four votes to approve an ordinance. She read into the record the portion of the Council manual pertaining to approval of ordinances . A MOTION WAS MADE BY MACALLISTER, SECONDED BY KELLY, TO RETURN THE ITEM PERTAINING TO ZONE CHANGE NO. 91-4 TO COUNCIL ON JANUARY 21, 1992 AS A REPORT OF THE POTENTIALITY OF A ZONE CHANGE ACTION ON BEHALF OF THE CITY COUNCIL. THERE WAS NO ACTION TAKEN BASED ON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Silva, MacAllister, Kelly NOES: Moulton-Patterson, Winchell, Green ABSENT: Robitaille At the January 27, 1992 meeting Council directed staff to initiate a zone change on the property with the following action. Staff Report - 5/5/92 -2- �� P (3140d) j STAFF TO RETURN WITH PROCEDURE FOR APPLICATION BY CITY FOR ZONE CHANGE - APPROVED - PENINSULA PUMP CO - 7511 WARNER AVE - (ZONE CHANGE PREVIOUSLY DENIED 1/6/92) (450 . 20) A MOTION WAS MADE BY MACALLISTER, SECONDED BY KELLY, TO DIRECT STAFF TO RETURN WITH A PROCEDURE BY WHICH THE CITY CAN MAKE APPLICATION TO CHANGE THE ZONING ON AN APPROXIMATELY 7, 500 SQUARE FOOT (NET) PARCEL OF PROERTY LOCATED AT 7511 WARNER AVENUE FROM R2 (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO M1 (LIMITED MANUFACTURING) . (PENINSULA PUMP COMPANY) ZONE CHANGE DENIED 1/6/92 . THE MOTION CARRIED BY THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Robitaille, Silva, MacAllister, Kelly NOES: Moulton-Patterson, Winchell ABSENT: Green 3 . 0 SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS: North and East of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential ZONE: R2 (Medium Density Residential) LAND USE: Single Family Dwellings and Multi-Family Dwellings South of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Industrial ZONE: M1 (Limited Manufacturing) LAND USE: Industrial West of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Industrial ZONE: M1 (Limited Manufactuiring) LAND USE: Industrial 4 . 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Community Development advertised draft Negative Declaration No. 91-26 for twenty-one (21) days . A written recommendation for approval of the negative declaration was received from the Environmental Board and is attached to this report . The staff , in its initial study of the project, has recommended that a .negative declaration be issued. Prior to any action on Zone Change No. 92-2, it is necessary for the Planning Commission to review and act on Negative Declaration No. 91-26 . 5 . 0 COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable. 6 .0 REDEVELOPMENT STATUS: Not applicable. 7 .0 SPECIFIC PLAN: Not applicable. Staff Report - 5/5/92 -3- 7 (3140d) 8 . 0 SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE: Not applicable. 9 . 0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: Project Description This application is a request to rezone an approximately 7, 500 square foot parcel. from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) . The current use of the property is legal non-conforming in that Peninsula Pump and Equipment, an industrial use, is currently operating on the site. The applicant proposes to demolish the existing structure on the site and construct an industrial structure in its place. Since the current zoning and general plan designation on the site is residential, a zone change is required for the proposed new construction. ANALYSIS General Plan Consistency Typically, a General Plan amendment would be required in conjunction with a zone change in order to achieve consistency between the General Plan and zoning . A General Plan amendment is not necessary in this case, however, as the City' s current General Plan exempts properties less that one (1) acre in area from the zoning/general plan consistency requirement . The subject site is approximately one-sixth (1/6) of an acre in size. Permitted Uses The current zoning on the site (R2) would permit a maximum of three (3) residential dwelling units . The proposed zoning would permit a number of industrial uses . The applicant has submitted conceptual plans of what they propose to construct on the site. Although the plans submitted by the applicant are not the subject of this application, staff has performed a preliminary review and determined that the plans, with a few modifications, could conform to the proposed M1 (Limited Manufacturing) development standards . Lot Size The property currently consists of two (2) lots which have a net area of approximately 7, 500 square feet . Generally, the minimum lot size for M1 properties is 10, 000 square feet; however, smaller lot sizes are permitted if the parcel map is processed in conjunction with an administrative review to the Zoning Administrator. The purpose of this requirement is to allow the City to determined if the proposed improvements on the property can be adequately accommodated on the smaller lot size. If the Planning Commission approves this zone change request,. however, they would be making the determination that the smaller lot size is acceptable. Staff Report - 5/5/92 -4- 7e (3140d) Adiacent Land Uses The use of the properties within the immediate vicinity on the north side on Warner Avenue is generally multi-family residential with a few single family dwellings . The condition of the housing varies a large degree with many deteriorating properties as well as numerous new residential structures in the area . Directly to the north of the subject property, several new multi-family residential structures are under construction. Given the residential land use within the immediate vicinity, staff has several concerns regarding rezoning the property for industrial use. Truck traffic to the site would be via Lyndon Street, a street designed to residential standards . Noise created by truck traffic as a result of an industrial use on the site may be detrimental to the residential properties within the vicinity. Also, the area currently provides "market rate affordable" housing. Although only a few potential units would be lost, rezoning of the property from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) could set a precedent and contribute to the loss of affordable housing within the City. Finally, it should be noted that although properties have been rezoned by the City from a conforming general plan designation to a non-conforming designation in the past, the new use was always within the same general classification (i .e. , R1 to R2) . The City has never rezoned a property that conformed to the general plan to a completely different classification (i .e. , residential to industrial) . 10 . 0 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Negative Declaration No. 91-26 and deny Zone Change No . 92-2 with the following findings and forward the application to the City Council for final determination. FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - ZONE CHANGE NO 92-2: 1. The proposed zone change from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) is inconsistent with surrounding residential land uses . All other properties on Lyndon Street have a residential uses . 2 . The proposed zone change from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) is inconsistent with surrounding residential land uses . All other properties on Lyndon Street have a residential use. Additionally, duplexes are currently under construction on the parcels directly to the north of the site. Staff Report - 5/5/92 -5- (3140d) 3 . The proposed zone change from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Industrial) would be inconsistent with. Housing Element goals which are to provide for the housing needs of all economic segments of the community (Goals. 2 . 0) . Rezoning the property from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) would eliminate three (3) potential "market rate" affordable units from the City' s projected housing stock. 4 . The proposed zone change from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Industrial) would be incompatible with the adjacent residential properties to the north and east . Noise associated with industrial uses on the site as well as the potential truck traffic would be detrimental to the residential properties . 5 . Ingress and Egress to the site via Lyndon Street requires truck traffic on residential streets . Increased traffic noise and truck traffic would be incompatible with the residential character of the neighborhood. 11 . 0 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The Planning Commission may approve Negative Declaration No. 91-26 and Zone Change No . 92-2 with findings and conditions of approval and forward to the City Council for final action. ATTACHMENTS: 1 . Applicant ' s Narrative 2 . Reduced site plan, floor plan and elevations 3 . Draft Negative Declaration No. 91-26 4 . Memo from Environmental Board dated September 26, 1991 5 . Alternative Findings and Conditions of Approval 6 . Draft Ordinance to amend Article 906 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance code to rezone the subject property from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Industrial) HS:M : kJl Staff Report - 5/5/92 -6- I 1 (3140d) 1! 1 , -' - _ Qh IlIi �ljl�l;!1il.l r � ! �'! �' E ( •il r-•`. t] p I, I,I, G1 ��.�I•! II }l: -I I'! � !, ,:�-III: Ii .li. I; ,I '! ' ' � {1 II`•i'` II D II`' l� Ijtj Ii l )�r�, Q I �;'l{!. l� •I ri�;�lj Illrlljl � i ;� � jI : '_ I _.-�� - !I! I � , I !I i' I ( .J�f. I• �1 '�j !' jl .II I. I p:r•Ili: '� II' �1��!`{r�.� i I,I1J ; } -I, i'{! r][]( I ,III i ;I! '' I! I '! iI i•i��,, !,;I j,f'_ �.{I '�.�'J'_'�_f',��-!'; III i!1 ' � jl •i rJ`]r ! " j,! �;I I LI�I •!lil i � I 1'l. `J`]` 1ff J l rrc i !II i II!ir !+111±,1 lal. '{I! !• I t. I ]r I I•!`-1�I � �! I I I I r I' !�' � _ - -t.�i i I '-1_:I ' I -!!I-r!•� '-+ .I �!I,III� I ref' !:: ;- _ _}.;'. "!II I: Hr. J.:' t ;I .! 1. I •I:... .,ICI i f„ � ,-, i-;-I, ., -1.:- '�..- I! i i�_;. •� , ri-r } L - ills !. FII c�r'r � '�~-IIIIr`' I 110; � _ :I'li I-'. -1:. I�!� -I � I''r'11 ;lCl I.!- i- - Ii {j-f ' I I •Il J]7 � I! l�. yI`l:'�:i., 'I-�.,rIF � I•�II` �;;!` I _ _ i I�qI �:! !- .III': I - - :," :;i_j-�il � 'I' :I I It ��i!;�II I i� l I,�; vs l.. fz rt.. I<. c, it ,ri V m D O Val . , P 1 I-T IC^11 a&P 6� Y P rS A \V.,ou sa is � ftEPa,n �e<I ,�Y Fo n: 1�3v(}`t.! r�U)_!� la\)t F•.� �r a p u ......., � .. QiLq��'Q Pit nIH`e^.♦ Pu- .l C<r«.I 6 ,._..^ ....,....... ' A,�.: 0 t a : • F r0 i • 0 I: I. t i i ;I � � i •� `` i I i� � I I ' ' �� n� r o o r ,r. I o II lIn J I �� Ti -- I I � I � I• ° I � _ 'v ;fIY Q d 0 � (�. l..NAoiirica. `C` Re rLln f-�uLl,.r.fon ,.lf r :1,n',, (?1 1�r � - �� ..>��•�.. .. p L> PeHlK—LA, rurar Coar. C nT•nu tG,.LG '. I�' .. M'T In(TOr• 9lwCN� CA • 12 G4,WTI -:;JETS V m i R! RI RI m FRR, RI R3; R3 R3 R3 CF—E C2 .!el mi mi TE"' DP 2_ R3 mi R W" R2 R f R33',,(L R 3 CF—R hill C4 R3 R3 m i R 2 c- 3 D C2 R-31 4 S/ [131,11 m 1 F�' R 3 C4 R s 1-11 i o/ 2 ' ..,, ,„ .. i.... .,.... it_....__..._....._ „' �_.__.u...,..i..._.._.._. WARNER R2 FIR oR C4-MS AVE lo CF—E ct ml R2 R2 I j ca CF-R R2 CYPRES5 Av R2 R 2 R72 _'MI C:3 LLIR Tl M111 CF—E R3 7 no'c BETTYLi M I DR M R ml M I nlnt�IDRELL DR ...... RI R3 R3 I-T01 1111', R3 JR, R LIR T,' F— 10 ZC 92-2/ND 91-26 toe 1fl HUNTINCTON BEACH HUNTINGTON REACH PLANNING DIVISION f -7 - 2' FILE WIDE Please file this document in: 1 Category: Label : i i Established file j ✓ New file - see Other: j 0846I i i `v "STATE OF CAUFOANIA County of Orange i I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested rn the below entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the HUNTINGTON BEACH INDEPENDENT, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and publiished in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of Caldomra,and that attached Notice is a true and complete copy as was printed and published In the Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley issues of said newspaper to wit the issue(s)of: PUBLIC NOTICE I ZONE: R2 (Medium Den- REVISED sity REQUResidentiESal T: Rezone a RENOTIFICATION 7,438 square foot(net)par- NOTICE OF cel of real property from R2 PUBLIC HEARING (Medium Density Residen- ZONE CHANGE Val) to M1 (Limited Manu- NO.92.2/ facturing). NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL STA- TUS: Negative Declaration August' 6, 1992 DECLARATION No. 91-26 has been pre- NO.91-26 pared and advertised for a (Rezone 21 day public comment pe- property from riod which expired on Sep- R2(Medium tember 24, 1991.This Neg- ative Declaration will also be considered by Council. Residential) COASTAL STATUS: Not to M1 (Limited applicable Manufacturing)) ON FILE: A copy of the NOTICE IS HEREBY proposed request is on file GIVEN that the Huntington In the Community Develop- Beach City Council will ment Department, 2000 hold a public hearing in the Main Street, Huntington Council Chamber at the Beach, California 92648, Huntington Beach Civic for inspection by the pub- Center, 2000 Main Street, lic. A copy of the staff re- Huntington Beach, Califor• port will be available to in- nia, on the date and at the terested parties at City Hall time indicated below to re or the Main City Library celve and consider the (7111 Talbert Avenue) after statements of all person July 1,1992. I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the who wish to be heard rela ALL INTERESTED PER- t,. five to the application de SONS are invited at attend foregoing I$true and COrreCt. scribed below. said hearing and express 9 DATE/TIME: Monday, Au-opinions, or submit evi- gust 17,1992,7:00 PM dence for or against the APPLICATION NUMBER: application as outlined; fur- Executed on August 6 199 2 NegativeZone Declaration on 9 No.therVe questions ere are lease call � � 9 q P: 91.26 Robert Franklin, Associate at CO Mesa, Californiaa APPLICANT: City of Hun-Planner at 536.5271. tington Beach Connie Brockway, PROPERTY OWNER: Olaf City Clerk Smildzins (Peninsula 2000 Main Street, Pump) Huntington Beach,A Cal. LOCATION: 7511 Warner ifornla 92648 (714) )gnatUn3 536.5404 Published Huntington Beach Independent August 6,1992 081-021 PROOF OF PUBLICATION �J 0O • and EQUIPMENT July 27, 1992 City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk 2000 Main Street Huntington $each, CA 92648 Dear Ms. Brockway: We have applied for a zone change (no. 92-2) which is scheduled for the City Council meeting of August 3, 1992. bue to unforseen circumstances which will result in a hardship for us, we request that our application be continued to the next regular scheduled Council meeting. Your understanding in this matter is greatly appreciated. If Z can be of any further assistance, Z can be reached at 848-8395. Sincerely yours, r 5SIMildzins OS:df CC: Mayor Jim Silva. 7511 Warner Avenue • Huntington Beach, CA 92647 • (714) 848-8395 -, 7-, J- IJL VA:- - 92, MON: 1 4 =j3 PEN I NSULA PUMP C 0 R P I ... af ` 0 and EQUIPMENT,, r i I T July 27, 1992 City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk 2000 ,Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 bear Ats. Brochway: We have applied for a zone charje (no. 92-2) which is scheduled for the City Council meeting of August 3, 1992, Due to uiXforoc.en c i rcrurastaYaces which will result in a hardship for us, we recjuest that our application be continued to the next regular scheduled Council meeting. Your understanding in this matter is greatly appreciated, If I can be of any further assistance, I can be reached at W-8395. Sincerely yours, Lysin ldzirts 0s:of CC: Mayor Jim Si Iva I . C� 7511 Warner Avenue Huntington,Beach, CA 92647 • (714) 848-8395 � : / ��Ar�kl __._ 01-2 1�'/-02 02 : 1 p V-• M Ply: + M4N 1 4 53 F EM I NSULA U fl Fa 00FRP p 1\ .... .......... . O� G FAX TRANSMITTAL: TO: LOB me 9-GI COUPAN(J: FAX NL MPER: SOJECT: ZaAJz 617,4-e- MESSAGE: ZL FROM: PLNINSULA PUMP CORP. FAX NO: (714) 847�6718 NUM$ER Of PACES I NCLU..D r NC COVER SkIEE T: �-- IF YOU bO NOT RECEIVE ALL OF THE PACES - PLEASE CALL US 7511 Warner Avenue • Huntington Beach, CA 92647 • (714) 848-8395 Y^ r • REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION t ] July 6, 1992 Date Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Memb Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrat7 or Prepared by: Michael Adams, Director of Community Developm t Subject: ZONE CHANGE NO. 92-2/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-26n Consistent with Council Policy? Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception g Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Transmitted for City Council consideration is a request to change the zoning on a 7, 500 square foot parcel of property located at 5711 Warner Avenue from Medium Density Residential to Limited Manufacturing. RECOMMENDATION• Staff Recommendation: Motion to: "Approve Negative Declaration No. 91-26 and deny Zone Change No. 92-2 with findings. " (See Attachment No. 2 for Suggested Findings for Denial) planning Commission Recommendation: Motion to: "Approve Negative Declaration No. 91-26 and Zone Change No. 92-2 with findings by adopting Ordinance No. 3i6 which would rezone the property generally located at 5711 Warner Avenue from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) . " (See Attachment No. 3 for Planning Commission action and Suggested Findings for Approval . ) r. �l PI O 5/85 ANALYSIS: Troject Description: This application is a request to rezone an approximately 7, 500 square foot parcel from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) . The current use of the property is a legal non-conforming industrial use, (Peninsula Pump and Equipment) . Current zoning allows only health and safety improvements to the property such as new roofing or driveways or, through a conditional use permit, an expansion of no more than 10%. The applicant proposes to demolish the existing structure on the site and construct a new industrial structure in its place. Since the current zoning and general plan designation on the site is residential and the applicant proposes more than minor modifications to the property, a zone change is required for the proposed new construction. This Zone Change Request was processed earlier this year and the vote by the City Council resulted in a denial due to a lack of a majority vote (see Attachment No . 4) . The City Council directed staff to initiate a new zone change application for this site. The Planning Commission approved the zone change request on May 5, 1992 . General Plan Consistency: Typically, a general plan amendment would be required in conjunction with a zone change in order to achieve consistency between the City' s General Plan and zoning designation. A general plan amendment is not necessary in this case, however, as the City' s General Plan exempts properties less than one (1) acre in area from the zoning/general plan consistency requirement . The subject site is approximately one-sixth (1/6) of an acre in size. Permitted Uses : The current zoning on the site R2-Medium Density Residential would permit a maximum of three (3) residential dwelling units . The proposed zoning would permit general industrial uses. The applicant has submitted conceptual plans of what they propose to construct on the site. Although the plans submitted by the applicant are not the subject of this application, staff has performed a preliminary review and determined that the plans, with a few modifications, could conform to the proposed Ml-Limited Manufacturing development standards . If the zone change request is approved, the specific development request will require review by the Zoning Administrator through the parcel map and administrative review application process . RCA - 1/6/92 -2- (1362D) Lot Size: '.The property currently consists of two (2) lots which have a net area of approximately 7, 500 square feet. Generally, the minimum lot size for M1 properties is 10, 000 square feet; however, smaller lot sizes are permitted if the parcel map is processed in conjunction with an administrative review to the Zoning Administrator . The purpose of this requirement is to allow the City to determine if the proposed improvements on the property can be adequately accommodated on the smaller lot size. If the City Council approves this zone change request, however, they would be making the determination that the smaller lot size is acceptable for an industrial use at this subject location. Adjacent Land Uses : The use of the properties within the immediate vicinity on the north side of Warner Avenue is generally multi-family residential with a few single-family dwellings . The condition of the housing varies to a large degree with many deteriorating properties as well as numerous new residential structures in the area. Directly to the north of the subject property, several new multi-family residential structures are under construction. Staff Concerns : Given the residential land use within the immediate vicinity, staff has three major concerns regarding rezoning the property for industrial use: 1. Truck traffic to the site would be via Lyndon Street, a street designed to residential standards . Residential streets have a curb to curb width of 40 feet . After required dedications, Lyndon Street will have a curb to curb width of 40 feet . Typically, the City has required streets serving industrial uses to have a curb to curb width of 44 feet . Therefore, the proposed street will be 4 feet less in width than what is usually required to serve an industrial use. 2 . Noise created by truck traffic and as a result of an industrial use on the site may be detrimental to the residential properties within the vicinity of the property. As discussed above, the residential properties in the immediate vicinity of the property are in the process of recycling. For example, the two (2) properties directly adjacent to the property under consideration for the zone change have new duplexes on them. Staff is concerned that the intensification of the industrial use at the subject location may stunt or halt the recycling of the properties underway in the vicinity. It should be noted that while the current industrial use does not appear to negatively impact the residential properties, nothing would prevent the property from being sold or leased to a more typical industrial use that may be less compatible with the nearby residences. RCA - 1/6/92 -3- (1362D) ,3 . Although properties have been rezoned by the City from a conforming general plan designation to a non-conforming designation in the past, the new use was always within the same general classification (i .e. , R1 to R2) . The City has never rezoned a property that conformed to the general plan to a completely different classification (i .e. , residential to industrial) . Summary: Although approval of the subject zone change would provide a "quick fix" to the property by allowing the property owner to demolish a blighted tin structure and replace it with a more attractive building, staff believes that approval of the zone change request would, in the long term, be detrimental to the residential properties in the vicinity. The concept of permitting non-conforming uses to exist is based on the eventual recycling of the property to a conforming use. Staff believes that since the useful life of the structure has expired, the use of the property should be brought into conformance with the current zoning and general plan designations on the property. FUNDING SOURCE: Not applicable ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Motion to: "Approve Negative Declaration No. 91-26 and Zone Change No. 92-2 with findings . " ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance No. 2 . Suggested Findings for Denial (Staff recommendation) 3 . Findings and Conditions -of Approval (Planning Commission recommendation) 4 . January 6, 1992 City Council minutes 5 . Applicant ' s Narrative 6 . Draft Negative Declaration No . 91-26 7. Planning Commission Staff Report dated May 5, 1992 with conceptual site plan, floor plan and elevations MTU:MA:TR: jr RCA - 1/6/92 -4- (1362D) r r i, r r ATTACHMENT 2 STAFF SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - ZONE CHANGE NO, 92-2 1. The proposed zone change from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) does not conform with the land use designation of Medium Density Residential which permits only residential uses. 2 . The proposed zone change from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) is inconsistent with surrounding residential land uses. All other properties on Lyndon Street have a residential use. Additionally, duplexes are currently under construction on the parcels directly to the north of the site. 3 . The proposed zone change from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Industrial) would be incompatible with the adjacent residential properties to the north and east. Noise associated with industrial uses on the site as well as the potential truck traffic would be detrimental to the residential properties. (1362D-5) 7 ATTACHMENT 3 ! PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION AND FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ON MAY 5. 1992: ON A MOTION BY LEIPZIG AND SECOND BY KIRKLAND, THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-26 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: NEWMAN, RICHARDSON, SHOMAKER, DETTLOFF, LEIPZIG, KIRKLAND, BOURGUIGNON NOES: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE ABSENT: NONE ON MOTION BY LEIPZIG AND SECOND BY KIRKLAND, THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED ZONE CHANGE NO. 92-2 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: NEWMAN, SHOEMAKER, LEIPZIG, KIRKLAND, BOURGUIGNON NOES: RICHARDSON, DETTLOFF ABSTAIN: NONE ABSENT: NONE FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - ZONE CHANGE NO, 92-2: 1. Although proposed zone change from R2- M1 does not conform with the Land Use Element of the General Plan, the site is less than an acre and is exempt from the zoning/general plan consistancy requirement . 2. The proposed zone change from R2 to M1 is consistent with the existing use of the property and is compatible with adjacent land uses . CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - ZONE CHANGE NO 92-2• 1. A tentative parcel map application in conjunction with an administrative review application shall be submitted to the City for review of the development of the site. Approval of Zone Change No. 92-2 does not imply approval of the conceptual plan submitted as a part of the zone change application. 2 . Any future development of the site shall be subject to the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code and Huntington Beach Municipal Code. (1362D-6) F i ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 9061 THEREOF TO PROVIDE FOR CHANGE OF ZONING FROM "MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL" TO "LIMITED MANUFACTURING" ON REAL PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON .17 NET ACRES ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WARNER AVENUE AND LYNDON STREET (ZONE CHANGE 92-2) WHEREAS, pursuant to the State Planning and Zoning Law, the Huntington Beach Planning Commission and Huntington Beach City Council have had separate public hearings relative to Zone Change No. 92-2 wherein both bodies have carefully considered all information presented at said hearings, and after due consideration of the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission and all evidence presented to said City Council, the City Council finds that such code amendment is proper. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does ordain as follows : SECTION 1. The following described real property, generally located on the northwest corner of Warner Avenue and Lyndon Street, is hereby changed from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) : Parcel I - Lots 17 and 18 of Tract 179, recorded in Miscellaneous Maps Book 16, page 42, records of Orange County. Containing: 7,483 square feet (net) . 16, 500 square feet (gross) . SECTION 2 . The Director of Community Development is hereby selected to amend Section 9061, District Map 26 (Sectional District Map 23-5-11) to reflect Zone Change No. 92-2 described in Section 1 hereof . Copies of said district maps, as amended hereby are available for inspection in the Office of the City Clerk. SECTION 3 . This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its passage. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of 1992 . Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City At orney REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED: City A inistrator Director of Community Development 2 - Page 5 - Council /Agency Minutes - 1/6/92 (City Council) PUBLIC, HEARING - ZONE CHANGE NO. 91-4 - APPEAL DENIED - NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-26 - INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 3129 - FAILED - OLAF SMILDZINS - 7511 WARNER AVE (450.20) The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing to consider the following: APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No. 91-4 Negative Declaration No. 91-26 APPLICANT: Olaf Smildzins (Peninsula Pump) LOCATION: 7511 Warner Avenue ZONE: R2 (Medium Density Residential ) RE UEST: Rezone a 7,438 square foot (net) parcel of real property from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) . ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No. 91-26 has been prepared and advertised for a 21 day public comment period which expired on September 24, 1991 . This Negative Declaration will also be considered by Council . COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable The City Clerk presented Ordinance No. 3129 for Council approval - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 9061 THEREOF TO PROVIDE FOR CHANGE OF ZONING FROM 'MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL' TO ' LIMITED MANUFACTURING' ON REAL PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WARNER AVENUE AND LYNDON STREET (ZONE CHANGE NO. 91-4) ." Legal notice as provided to the City Clerk' s Office by staff had been- mailed, published, and posted. No communications or written protests were received on the matter. Mike Adams, Community Development Director, presented a staff report using slides. The Mayor declared the public hearing open. Mark Rogers, J.L.A. Planning, Inc. , representing applicant; spoke in support of Zone Change No. 91-4 and stated he was present to answer questions. There being no one present to speak further on the matter and there being no protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor. Discussion was held by Council . Mr. Rogers answered Councilmember Kelly' s questions. A motion was made by Winchell , seconded by Moulton-Patterson, to approve Negative Declaration No. 91-26 and deny Zone Change No. 91-4 with findings for denial as set forth in Attachment No. 1 of the RCA dated January 6, 1992. The motion FAILED by the following roll call vote: AYES: Moulton-Patterson, Winchell , Green NOES: Silva, MacAllister, Kelly ABSENT: Robitaille Page 6 - Council/Agency Minutes - 1/6/92 RECESS - RECONVENE , The Mayor called a recess of the Council meeting at 9:15 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 9:30 p.m. ACTION CONTINUED ON: (City Council) PUBLIC HEARING - ZONE CHANGE NO. 91-4 - NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-26 - INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 3129 - OLAF SMILDZINS - 7511 WARNER AVE (450.20) The City Attorney reported that the City Charter requires four votes to approve an ordinance. She read into the record the portion of the Council manual pertaining to approval of ordinances. A motion was made by MacAllister, seconded by Kelly, to return the item pertaining to Zone Change No. 91-4 to Council on January 21 , 1992 as a report of the potentiality of a Zone Change Action on behalf of the City Council . There was no action taken based on the following roll call tie vote: AYES: Silva, MacAllister, Kelly NOES: Moulton-Patterson, Winchell , Green ABSENT: Robitaille 'tkMayor l PUBLIC HEARING - DEFERRED T 1/21/92 - APPEAL OF PLANNING APPROVAL OF CUP NO. 91-3 WITH SPECIAL PERMITS - CDP NO. 1-21 - CE N0. 91-45 - TPM NO. 91-235 - DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. CORNER MAIN/PCH - ABDELMUTI DEVELOPMENT CO. (420.40) The ounced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing to consider the"` wing appeal : APPLICATION NUMB£It Conditional Use Permit No. 91-39 with Special Permits Coastal Development ermit No. 91-21 - Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 91-45 - Tentative Par FAI Map No. 91-235 - Draft Environmental Impact Report No. 89-6 APPLICANT: City of HAag�ton Beach Redevelopment Agency/Lang Lampert Architects APPELLANT: Lang Lampert Architects�M, bdelmuti Development Co. LOCATION: 101 Main Street (Northwetorner of Main Street at Pacific Coast Highway) ZONE: Downtown Specific Plan No. 3-Visitorr`Sea�ring Commercial REQUEST: To permit the construction of a 48�0,60.�,square foot four (4) story commercial/office building with special permits o site coverage, upper story setbacks and adherence to the five (5) foot build #o line. The proposal also includes a 141 space parking and one (1) loading space_ ariance. APPEAL. The appellant is appealing the specific Nhe on of approval (Condition #1 ) which requires that the proposed tower be lowered four (4) feet from 89 feet to 85 feet and the requirement t 'nimum four (4) foot upper story setback shall be provided along the er walls on Main Street and Pacific Coast Highway from the second floor de to the third floor facade. �! 6 , J.L. Webb Planning, Inc. ®000 2900 Bristol Streei, Suite F102, Costa Mesa CA 92626 (,714) 557-3707 Land Planning • Landscape Architecture Urban Design July 26, 1991 City of Huntington Beach Department of Community Development 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 This zone change request is for the 0 C 8-acre parcel owned by Peninsula Pump and Equipment Inc. We are requesting that the zoning be changed from R-2 (medium density residential) to M-I (general industrial). The property is located on Warner Avenue in the City of Huntington Beach. The area borders a large A,I-1 district and an R-2 area. Specifically,the property is bounded on the.wesi by the Pacific Electric railroad tracks, and adjacent to the ti-acks on the west is an area of general industrial development. Directly to the north and to the east of the subject property is medium density residential development. To the south of the property is general indusrial dCVClopment. There currently exists a small structure on ere 1ot of tine parcel. "Phis sullcture is not in confonmance with the City's zoning because the widening of Warner Avenue resulted in its location on a right-of-way line. The owner proposes to construct a concrete block building on the other lot of this parcel. The existing stizlcture will be demolished and replace:] by it parking lot landscaped in conformance with the desisn guidelines for N1-1 uses. The purpose of both the existing and the proposed building is the warehouse storage of pumps for delivery and installation. t'nank you for your attention to this application. Sinc;,rely, Michael J. Bernhardt Project Manager 0 CLD:kjh 9102-8 P�T�C�HM�� fin, s •. . I l J� CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH , ?ti INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNJINCTON BEACH To Tom Rogers From Julie sugi Assistant Planner Assi t nt Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT August 29, 1991 Subject FORM NO. 91-26 Date Applicant: Olaf Smildens Request: A zone change of an approximately 8,100 square foot area from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to MI (Light Industrial). No development is proposed at this time. Subsequent development will be subject to a minimum of Tentative Parcel Map and Administrative Review approval and therefore will require additional review. Location: 7511 Warner Avenue (Northside of Warner Avenue between Lyndon and Gothard Streets) Bac��round Staff has reviewed the environmental assessment form noted above and has determined that a negative declaration may be filed for the project. In view of this, a draft negative declaration was prepared and was published in the Daily Pilot for a tv.•enty—one (21) day public review period commencing Tuesday, September 3, 1991 and ending Tuesday, September 24, 1991 . If any comments regarding the draft negative declaration are received, you will be notified immediately. Recommendation The Environmental Assessment Committee recommends that the Planning Commission approve Negative Declaration No. 91-26 finding that the proposed project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment. JO:lp (0620d-2) '� HN1 NrO . GA 1 LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF HUNTI.NGTON BEACH Notice is hereby given by the Department of Community Development, Planning Division of the City of Huntington Beach that the following Draft Negative Declaration requests have been.prepared and will be submitted to the City of Huntington Beach Planning COMMiSSlOn for their consideration. The draft negative declarations will be avaiiable for public review and comment for t\.,enty-one (21) days commencing Tuesday, September 3, 1991 . Draft Negative Declaration No. 91-19 in conjunction with Conditional Use Permit No. 91-1 is a request to construct a 20,195 sq. ft. expansion to an existing 5,720 sq. ft. church. The expansion consists of a 405 seat 11 ,850 sq. ft. new church, 7,230 sq. ft. of new classroom/adm ins trative area, 400 sq. ft. of storage area, and a 1 , 105 sq. ft. addition to the new parish hall. The protect also includes a request for joint .,sc iMri:ing and a special permit to allow a nnax 20`'.•o compact parking stalls. l"he clr;:rch is ,.t 18631 Chapel Lane. Draft Negative Declaration No. 91-26 in conjunction with Zone Change No. 91-4 is a request to amend the zoning on approximately 8,100 square foot area from.. R2 ('`tedium Density Residential) to M1 (Light Industrial). No development is pro.posed at tris time. The site is located at 7511 Warner Avenue. Copies of these requests are on file with the Department of Corn:nunit , City of Huntington Beach, 2000 Main Street, Hunti gton Beach, ( a:;for:: r: \r;:, person wishing to comment on these requests may do so in writing within t•aenty-one (21 ) days of this notice by providing written comments to the Department of Community Development, Planning Division, P.O. Box 190, Huntington Beach, CA 926,+8. (0626d) Cob ENVIRONMENTAL C►iECKLIST FORM CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 91-26 1 . Name of-Proponent: Olaf Smildens Address : 7511 Warner Avenue Huntington ©each, CA 92647 Phone Number: (714) 848-8395 2. Date Checklist Submitted for Review: August 28, 1991 3. Concurrent Entitlement(s).: Zone Change No. 91-4 4. Project Location: 7511 Warner Avenue (Northside of _ Warner Avenue between Lyndon and Gothard Streets) . 5. Proiect Description: A zone change of an approximately 8, D square foot area from P,2 (Medium Density Residential ) to M1 (Lig`. Industrial. ) . No development is proposed at this tine. development will be subject to a minimum of Tentative Parc:l. Map and Administrative Review approval and therefore will requirr• additional review. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of answers are included after each subsect�.on. ) Yes Maybe No 1 . Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or changes in geologic substructures? _ Y _ b. Disruptions, displacements , compaction or overcovering of the soil? Y Discussion: The project does not consist of any development at this time. Subsequent development, under the proposed zoning may result is some disruption, displacement, compaction and overcovering of soil . However, impacts associated with the disruption, displacement, compaction and overcovering of soil are not anticipated to be substantially different from those associated with development under existing zoning. Furthermore, soils impacts of future development will be project specific and will be addressed through the entitlement process. Future development will also be subject to standard conditions of approval which require submittal of a soils study and implementation of specifications contained therein; no significant impacts to earth conditions are anticipated to result from the proposed project. loa Y_U Maybe No c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? _ X d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? _ X Discussion: The project site is primarily flat and does not contain any unique physical features . Any changes in topography proposed by subsequent development will be project specific and will be addressed through the entitlement process . e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? _- _ X Discussion: The project does not include any development at this time. Subsequent development of the site m,,ay result in short-`erm wind erosion impacts during the site preparation and construction phases . However, subsequent development will be subject to standard conditions of approval requirinc implementation: of dust control measures; no significant impact is anticipated. f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? — X g. Exposure of people or property :o geologic hazards such as earthquakes, lands`.� =es, mudslides , ground failure, or O milar hazards? _ _ Y. _ Discussion: The project is not located in the vicinity of the Alquist-Priolo Spec' l 'hazard -one or any other known fault hazard; however, t`•e site is located in an area of potential e)Da-s:ve soils as identified in the City's 1974 Geotechnical Inputs report. The proposed project does not consist of any cevelopment at this time. However, subsequent development will be subject to standard conditions c; approval which require submittal of soils reports and implementation of measures contained therein; no sicr.i Ficant impacts are anticipated. 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X_ Discussion: Short Term: The proposed project does not consist of any development at this tirr.e. However, subsequent development under the proposed zoning may result short-term emissions frn- construction equipment and grading activities . Short-term dust and pollutant emissions are not anticipa'e, to be substantially different from those generated by development under the existing zoning. Subsequen' development will be subject to standard conditions of approval requiring implementation of dust control measures and restriction of construction activities during second stage smog alerts and high ozone days . No significant impact is anticipated. Long Term: Subsequent development and operation of industrial uses on the site may result in emissions due to vehicle traffic and equipment/processes used on site. However, vehicle emissions resulting from subsequent development are not anticipated to be substantial ; future occupants of the site will be subject to standard conditions of approval which require prospective occupants to provide information on equipment/processes which may generate air pollutants to the South Coast Air Quality Management District for review and approval prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. No significant impacts are anticipated. b. The creation of objectionable odors? X Discussion: No development is proposed at this time. Industrial land uses, allowed by the proposed zoning, are more likely to generate fumes or odors than the multi-family uses allowed under the current zoning. The Environmental Checklist - 7d (052 ) Yes Maybe No family residences to the north and south and adjacent to similar project site is adjacent to multi industrial uses to the south and west. However, subsequent development will be subject to additional review through the entitlement process and as discussed above, prospective occupants will be required to obtain SCAQMD approval prior to occupancy. C. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? - _ X ?. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? _K_. b. Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface runoff? X Discussion: The project site is currently occupied by a pump storage/repair business and is partially covered by impervious surfaces . No development is proposed at this time. However, subsequent development is anticipated to increase the amount of impervious surfaces on the site and will result in additional runoff from the site. Alternations to drainage patterns and run off resulting from subsequent development will also be project specific and will be addressed through the entitlement process . Subsequent development will be subject to standard conditions of approval requiring submittal of grading and hydraulic studies to insure that development will not adversely ;-pact drainage in the area. No significant impact is anticipated. c. A) terations to the course or flow or rlrod waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? _._ X e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any a': teration cf surface water qua'. ity, but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? _Y f Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? -X . g. Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdr.3 als , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X h. Substantial reduction in the amount of -ater otherwise available for public water supplies? _ _ X Discussion: The proposed zoning is not anticipated to result in a substantial increase in water usage or a significant reduction in the amount of water available to the city. i . Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? _ X_ Discussion: The proposed project site is not located in the vicinity of the flood plain or any other water related hazards. 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? X b. Reduction of the numbers of any mature, unique, rare or endangered species of plants? — X t-e Environmental Checklist -3- (0527d) Yes Maybe No c., Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? _ X d. Reduction in acreage of an agricultural crop? _ X Discussion (a-d) : The site is currently occupied by a pump storage/repair business and contains 1 mature tree which may have to be removed or relocated to develop site. However, the subsequent development will be subject to standard conditions of approval which require that mature trees be maintained if feasible or replaced at a 2:1 ratio. No significant impact is anticipated. 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of animals (birds , land animals including reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? _ Y, b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? _ X C. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? _ _ X d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? _X Discussion (a-d) : The site is occupied by a pump storage/repair business and does not appear to support any unique aniral species. No significant impact is anticipated. 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? X _. Discussion: Short-term: The project does not consist of any development at this time. however, equipment associated with construction of subsequent development may generate short-term increases in noise during the site preparation and construction phases . However, construction noise impacts resulting from development under the proposed zoning are not anticipated to be substantially different than those resulting from construction under the R2 Zoning. Subsequent development will be subject to standard conditions of approval which limit the hours of construction activities and compliance with the Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance. Long-Term: The project site is located within a 65 CNEL noise contour. The proposed zone change will remove residential zoning from the 65 CNEL. However, proposed zone change will also allow for industrial development adjacent to multi-family residences . The introduction of industrial uses and associated activities (such as truck traffic) is anticipated to increase noise in the project area and may impact residences to the north and east. Noise impacts are anticipated to be project specific and will be addressed through the entitlement process . No significant impacts are anticipated. b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? Y. Discussion: See 6a. 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X _ Discussion: The project does not consist of any development at this time; however subsequent development will result in new light and glare in the project vicinity. Subsequent development will be subject to Environmental Checklist 647 (0527d) f i Yes Maybe No entitlement and standard conditions of approval'which `require submittal of a lighting plan to insure that I a-ill not spill onto adjacent properties . No significant impact is anticipated. 8. Land Use. Will the .proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X Discussion: The proposed project is a change in zoning of the property. The existing zoning would allow for development of approximately 4 multi-family residential units. The project proposes amending the zoning on a 8,100 square foot strip of property from R2 (Medium Density Residential , 15 units/acre) to allow for industrial development on the site. Although the property is currently occupied by an industrial use, rezoning of the property is anticipated to result in development of more intense industrial uses adjacent to a residential area. The compatibility of the M1 zoning with adjacent uses will be determined by analysis contained in this study and during the zone change review process . 9. Natural Resources . Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X_ b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? — X Discussion (a-b) : No development is proposed at this time. Subsequent replacement of the existing building on the site with new industrial buildings may increase the demand of natural and energy resources . However, the increase usage is not anticipated to be substantial and any impact to the rate of usage or depletion of supplies is anticipated to be negligible. Project specific energy usage impacts will be addressed through the entitlement process . impacts will be reduced further through implementation of the Energy Conservation Standards in Title 24 of the California Administrative Code as required through standard conditions of approval . 111. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in t.'ke event of an accident or upset conditions? ._X_ Discussion: A portion of the site is currently occupied by a pump storage/repair business which will have to be removed in order to develop the site. Subsequent development of the site and removal of the business may require removal of waste fuel/oil tanks and contaminated soils which have the potential to release petroleum products through leakage or spillage. However, cleanup of the project site will be subject to standard conditions of approval which require any oil storage tanks to be removed and the site to be cleaned up in accordance with Fire Department standards . No significant impact is anticipated. b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? X 11 . Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? X_ Discussion: The proposed zone change will eliminate development of future housing opportunities on the site. However, the site will provide approximately 4 units which is not considered substantial . The proposed project may provide additional employment opportunities in the city. However, the number of jobs created is not anticipated to be substantial . The potential impacts to the city's growth rate and housing demand is considered negligible. 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? _ — X Environmental Checklist -5- (0527d) Yes Maybe No 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? X _ Discussion: The proposed project does not consist of any development at this time. Subsequent industrial development, based upon conceptual plans submitted by the applicant, is projected to generate approximately 22 trips with a peak hour trip generation of approximately 3 trips (calculations based upon ITE trip generation rates) . The current zoning to anticipated to allow for development of approximately 4 units and will generate an estimated 24 ADT and 3 peak hour trips. The anticipated change in potential trip generations is negligible. Project specific traffic impacts resulting from subsequent development will be addressed through the entitlement process ; no significant impacts are anticipated. b. Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new off-site parking? X Discussion: Subsequent development will be required to comply with Article 960: "Parking and Landscaping" of the City of Huntington Beach Ordinance Code which requires that all parking be accommodated on site. No significant impact is anticipated. C. Substantial impact upon existing transportation sstems? _ _ X Discussion The proposed project does not cc-sist of any development at this time. However, the zone change wi " allow for industrial development �n the vicinity of multi--family residential units and has a potential 'or generating industrial truck traffic on adjacent residential streets Project specific circulation impacts wall be addressed throug` the entitlement process . No significant impact is anticipated. d. Alterations to present patterns of circ:'ation a- movement of people and/or goods? — ___ X Discussion: See 13c. e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vef.::rles , bicyclists or pedestrians? X Discussion: The proposed project does not consist of any development at this time. However, subsequent development will result in the presence of construction and industrial truck traffic and may result in increased obstacles to vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians during the construction and operation of industrial uses. Construction related hazards are short-term and are not anticipated to be substantial . Furthermore, subsequent development will be subject to standard conditions of approval requiring submittal of a construction vehicle routing plan. Industrial truck use on the site will be dependent on future uses on the site. Project specific traffic impacts will be addressed through the entitlement process . 14. Public Services . Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? X b. Police protection? X C. Schools? X d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X Environmental Checklist -6- (0527d) r : Yes Maybe e. Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? X Discussion: The project site is currently unimproved and will require installation of sidewalk, curb and gutter which will be maintained by the City. However, these improvements are not considered substantial and will not require any additional manpower or facilities to serve the proposed project. f. Other governmental services? Y Discussions (a-d,f : All public services are currently available for the site. Development under the proposed zoning will not result in a need for any additional fire, police, school , park, public facilities or services . No significant impact is anticipated. 15. Energy. Will the -roposal result in: a. Use of substa-.c:al amounts of fuel or energy? _ r Discussion: See 9 (a,o) . b. Substantial i'crease in demand upon existing source of energy, or require t-he development r. s u rces of energy? Discussion: See 9 16. Utilities . Will _ proposal result in a need for• new systems , or substantial alterations to the following ; ties : a. Power or natu-al --as? b. Communication systems? c. water? d. Sewer or sept— tanks.? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? Discussion (a-f) : All utilities are currently available in the project vicinity. Subsequent developmert c• industrial uses may require installation of connections into existing utility systems ; however, the subsequent development is not anticipated to result in a need for any new systems or substantial alterations to existing systems to serve the site. 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? _ X b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X r _ _ 4 � Environmental Checklist 7 (0527d) l Yes Maybe No rt Discussion: The site does not currently offer any view opportunities and is not anticipated to result in an aesthetically offensive site; no significant impact is anticipated. 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? _ _ X Discussion: The proposed project site will not impact any recreational opportunities . 20. Cultural Resources . a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? _ X b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a orehistc•ric or historic building, structure, or object? X c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? _ _ X d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? __._ _ X Discussion (a-d) : The proposed project site is not located in the vicinity of any :-:own archaeological sites. 21 . Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the proiect have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, s-rb- starntially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species , cause a fish or wi Ali population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant :r animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plan: or- animal or eliminate important examples of the mojor periods of Caiifc•rn.a iistc,'y �r prehistory? _ X b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-teen impacts will endure well into the future. ) X c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively consid- erable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small , but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) X d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X _nvironmental Checklist -8- , (0527d) < DETERMINATION On the basis o,f this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION Will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there _ will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL _ IMPACT REPORT is required. r Date (' Sign re Revised: March, 1990 For: City of Huntington Beach Co"nunity Development De ap rtment Environmental Checklist _ _ 9 (O527d) I � M 0 1600 3200 1 V eot . o = ARGOSY < Z. < z �� , lU1IIC i1 - �-Illll WARNIR 1 I 1 I N.•.u1011 I f I Il 1 I I � J VICINITY MAP 1Rl . HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION huntington beach department of community development �Mff , , REPORT EXECUTIVE SUNIlKARY MAY 5. 1992 ZONE CHANGE N0, 92-2/ NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO, 91-26 Zone Change No. 92-2 is a request to rezone a 7,438 square foot parcel from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) . This request was approved by the Planning Commission on October 22, 1991 and denied by the City Council on January 6, 1992 due to a lack of a majority vote. The Council then directed staff to resubmit the zone change as a City application. Peninsula Pump is currently operating on the site as a legal non-conforming use. As in the previous request, staff is recommending denial . If approved, the zone change would result in a parcel that does not meet the minimum 10, 000 square foot lot for a M1 zoned property and the zoning would not be in compliance with the Medium Density Residential land use designation. The zone change would also result in industrial traffic using residential streets and could cause noise, vibration and odors to the residences . The site is located in a neighborhood with low income housing units and if the zone change is approved, the potential for market-rate low income housing at this site will be lost . There are other more suitable sites for Peninsula Pump along Gothard Street that would not require a zone change and that would not negatively impact nearby residences . Wr Wo, AMI �A A-F M-23C TO: Planning Commission FROM: Community Development DATE: Male 5, 1992 SUBJECT: ZON11E CHANGE NO. 92-2/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-26 APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 PROPERTY OWNER: Clarence Victory, 210 Littlefield Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94080 REQUEST: Rezone a 7,438 net square foot parcel (net) of real property from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) . LOCATION: 7511 Warner Avenue (north side of Warner Avenue on the east side of the Southern Pacific Railroad) DATE ACCEPTED: April 1, 1992 ZONE: R2 (Medium Density Residential) GENERAL PLAN: Medium Density Residential EXISTING USE: Industrial (Legal Non-Conforming) ACREAGE: Approximately 7, 500 square feet 1 . 0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Motion to: "Approve Negative Declaration No. 91-26 and deny Zone Change No. 92-2 with findings and forward to City Council for final determination. " 2 . 0 GENERAL INFORMATION: Zone Change No. 92-2 in conunction with Negative Declaration No. 91-26 is a request to change the zoning on a parcel of property from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) , which will permit the property owner to construct an industrial building on the site. S This zone change was previously reviewed by the Planning Commission on October 22, 1991 as Zone Change No. 91-4 . A MOTION WAS MADE BY KIRKLAND, SECOND BY BOURGUIGNON, TO APPROVE ZONE CHANGE NO. 91-4 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-26 WITH FINDINGS AND FORWARD TO CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL DETERMINATION, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Newman, Shomaker, Kirkland, Dettloff, Bourguignon, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: Richardson ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED The City Council denied Zone Change No. 91-4 at the January 6 , 1992 meeting due to lack of a majority vote. A MOTION WAS MADE BY WINCHELL, SECONDED BY MOULTON-PATTERSON, TO APPROVE NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-26 AN DENY ZONE CHANGE NO. 91-4 WITH FINDINGS FOR DENIAL AS SET FORTH IN ATTACHMENT NO. 1 OF THE RCA DATED JANUARY 6, 1992 . THE MOTION FAILED BY THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Moulton-Patterson, Winchell, Green NOES: Silva, MacAllister, Kelly ABSENT: Robitaille ACTION CONTINUED ON: (City- Council PUBLIC HEARING - ZONE CHANGE NO. 91-4 - NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-26 - INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 3129 - OLAF SMILDZINS - 7511 WARNER AVE (450 . 20) The City Attorney reported that the City Charter requires four votes to approve an ordinance. She read into the record the portion of the Council manual pertaining to approval of ordinances . A MOTION WAS MADE BY MACALLISTER, SECONDED BY KELLY, TO RETURN THE ITEM PERTAINING TO ZONE CHANGE NO. 91-4 TO COUNCIL ON JANUARY 21, 1992 AS A REPORT OF THE POTENTIALITY OF A ZONE CHANGE ACTION ON BEHALF OF THE CITY COUNCIL. THERE WAS NO ACTION TAKEN BASED ON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Silva, MacAllister, Kelly NOES: Moulton-Patterson, Winchell, Green ABSENT: Robitaille At the January 27, 1992 meeting Council directed staff to initiate a zone change on the property with the following action. Staff Report - 5/5/92 -2- �� (3140d) �STAFF TO RETURN WITH PROCEDURE FOR APPLICATION BY CITY FOR ZONE CHANGE - APPROVED - PENINSULA PUMP CO - 7511 WARNER AVE - (ZONE CHANGE PREVIOUSLY DENIED 1/6/921 (450 .20) A MOTION WAS MADE BY MACALLISTER, SECONDED BY KELLY, TO DIRECT STAFF TO RETURN WITH A PROCEDURE BY WHICH THE CITY CAN MAKE APPLICATION TO CHANGE THE ZONING ON AN APPROXIMATELY 7, 500 SQUARE FOOT (NET) PARCEL OF PROERTY LOCATED AT 7511 WARNER AVENUE FROM R2 (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO M1 (LIMITED MANUFACTURING) . (PENINSULA PUMP COMPANY) ZONE CHANGE DENIED 1/6/92 . THE MOTION CARRIED BY THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Robitaille, Silva, MacAllister, Kelly NOES: Moulton-Patterson, Winchell ABSENT: Green 3 . 0 SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS: North and East of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential ZONE: R2 (Medium Density Residential) LAND USE: Single Family Dwellings and Multi-Family Dwellings South of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Industrial ZONE: M1 (Limited Manufacturing) LAND USE: Industrial West of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Industrial ZONE: M1 (Limited Manufactuiring)- LAND USE: Industrial 4 .0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Community Development advertised draft Negative Declaration No. 91-26 for twenty-one (21) days . A written recommendation for approval of the negative declaration was received from the Environmental Board and is attached to this report . The staff, in its initial study of the project, has recommended that a negative declaration be issued. Prior to any action on Zone Change No. 92-2, it is necessary for the Planning Commission to review and act on Negative Declaration No. 91-26 . 5 .0 COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable. 6 . 0 REDEVELOPMENT STATUS: Not applicable. 7. 0 SPECIFIC PLAN: Not applicable. Staff Report 5/5/92 3- 7 (3140d) .4. 0 'SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE: Not applicable. 9 . 0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: Project Description This application is a request to rezone an approximately 7, 500 square foot parcel. from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) . The current use of the property is legal non-conforming in that Peninsula Pump and Equipment, an industrial use, is currently operating on the site. The applicant proposes to demolish the existing structure on the site and construct an industrial structure in its place. Since the current zoning and general plan designation on the site is residential, a zone change is required for the proposed new construction. ANALYSIS General Plan Consistency Typically, a General Plan amendment would be required in conjunction with a zone change in order to achieve consistency between the General Plan and zoning. A General Plan amendment is not necessary in this case, however, as the City' s current General Plan exempts properties less that one (1) acre in area from the zoning/general plan consistency requirement . The subject site is approximately one-sixth (1/6) of an acre in size. Permitted Uses The current zoning on the site (R2) would permit a maximum of three (3) residential dwelling units . The proposed zoning would permit a number of industrial uses . The applicant has submitted conceptual plans of what they propose to construct on the site. Although the plans submitted by the applicant are not the subject of this application, staff has performed a preliminary review and determined that the plans, with a few modifications, could conform to the proposed M1 (Limited Manufacturing) development standards . Lot Size The property currently consists of two (2) lots which have a net area of approximately 7, 500 square feet. Generally, the minimum lot size for M1 properties is 10, 000 square feet; however, -smaller lot sizes are permitted if the parcel map is processed in conjunction with an administrative review to the Zoning Administrator. The purpose of this requirement is to allow the City to determined if the proposed improvements on the property can be adequately accommodated on the smaller lot size. If the Planning Commission approves this zone change request,. however, they would be making the determination that the smaller lot size is acceptable. Staff Report - 5/5/92 -4- 7e (3140d) rj Adjacent Land Uses The use of the properties within the immediate vicinity on the north side on Warner Avenue is generally multi-family residential with a few single family dwellings . The condition of the housing varies a large degree with many deteriorating properties as well as numerous new residential structures in the area . Directly to the north of the subject property, several new multi-family residential structures are under construction. Given the residential land use within the immediate vicinity, staff has several concerns regarding rezoning the property for industrial use. Truck traffic to the site would be via Lyndon Street, a street designed to residential standards . Noise created by truck traffic as a result of an industrial use on the site may be detrimental to the residential properties within the vicinity. Also, the area currently provides "market rate affordable" housing . Although only a few potential units would be lost, rezoning of the property from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) could set a precedent and contribute to the loss of affordable housing within the City. Finally, it should be noted that although properties have been rezoned by the City from a conforming general plan designation to a non-conforming designation in the past, the new use was always within the same general classification (i .e. , R1 to R2) . The City has never rezoned a property that conformed to the general plan to a completely different classification (i .e. , residential to industrial) . 10 . 0 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Negative Declaration No.. 91-26 and deny Zone Change No . 92-2 with the following findings and forward the application to the City Council for final determination. FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - ZONE CHANGE NO 92-2 : 1. The proposed zone change from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) is inconsistent with surrounding residential land uses . All other properties on Lyndon Street have a residential uses . 2 . The proposed zone change from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) is inconsistent with surrounding residential land uses . All other properties on Lyndon Street have a residential use. Additionally, duplexes are currently under construction on the parcels directly to the north of the site. Staff Report - 5/5/92 -5- (3140d) 3 . The proposed zone change from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to Mi (Limited Industrial) would be inconsistent with Housing Element goals which are to provide for the housing needs of all economic segments of the community (Goals 2 . 0) . Rezoning the property from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) would eliminate three (3) potential "market rate" affordable units from the City' s projected housing stock. 4 . The proposed zone change from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Industrial) would be incompatible with the adjacent residential properties to the north and east . Noise associated with industrial uses on the site as well as the potential truck traffic would be detrimental to the residential properties . 5 . Ingress and Egress to the site via Lyndon Street requires truck traffic on residential streets . Increased traffic noise and truck traffic would be incompatible with the residential character of the neighborhood. 11. 0 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The Planning Commission may approve Negative Declaration No. 91-26 and Zone Change No. 92-2 with findings and conditions of approval and forward to the City Council for final action. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Applicant ' s Narrative 2 . Reduced site plan, floor plan and elevations 3 . Draft Negative Declaration No. 91-26 4 . Memo from Environmental Board dated September 26, 1991 5 . Alternative Findings and Conditions of Approval 6 . Draft Ordinance to amend Article 906 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance code to rezone the subject property from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Industrial) HS:M :kjl Staff Report - 5/5/92 -6- ? / 1 (3140d) � •.!!.I; D 1III. ! j 1 { �i 7.7) Q ,_ - yy t !iI! !I p :,' _ -;�.:;• ii .i•I i i I.�j h.y I 'i �I i i�`;I ))` � ' I, , _ I i U' "'_.._ :':'7:� }!; � ':;�.'! {i- .I •':I'{�!Til�i` ,j! 7[7 � :..: .. i�i: il. I' Q �il � I fi� (�ij� '!+!I}jlll��: I�1 •,�,!1f!I �! ! 'II:I!1''I Ijj ! ''� 'll 'II I� l.�l.'' F .�'_'-.i F. l�F` Ilil II`I� Irl- jr� '{ !Ei�: :I' [. 11� ,! -li •I, 'iCF!i, !! s{_:'r,,.i'�.! ti. 1 i!•I I I j 117���I�!��(I�ly II i �[ ! j i' I j'' .:I I.I' �1 I!..• 'I �' '.�'a�-'_ �l 1 r,-t�` �=1 fliljll' ,!Clf�� Ijl,j!j []`j � I �; �!C:i►4 �=�,;� i:l�,it , I ;iC;.�l,l .i-�.� _;��-,a��_}: ` ��� �+ I ll::� ,Ilil!I?. — �7L�, . .. .!, jli 'I •!: - ,t� itl° ;I; �: 1 ;,:'t::,ll.ii 4 l{_,1' JJ� � r,i [-[-f _ �.I� ,! -I', I _-j .i•�' !-•,;��:I,t I;I .I .� t!.i I�:�. i I�G �j.{.I .Iltlllil'I!i}71;1''• [)[][ :`;, "_'lii :Ill�j j�'-';.�.��'`.-,- _4al .jj:l �.! -,I:G.: j �!:�I�'I 'j' ij!;!il� !lili. t) jr -':i, ^;i1.;��wrr.''i{.'. '! j:Iii!: '•�!illi?t I�,II-.illll�!` ll: 'lilll�tjr .][ j:: _.f'r 'F ° 'Ij �::`l.'frf'�_i'�t�l,iti i:lfl�ji�`L•F({-!.l' II!i.,l{( ! 1.!l Ill:illi lilj [),)t , _'•!� -!; ._ :III � 11 .+}, i�. �i � Iti IiFt(.:_ F l {.•'!- Li i`L :�i �":'j i;�i I ;l [?[)[ C i'. .., .: �-._ {: _�l Il _ _ _ -r11 _- l; ! t.�. ,T�,{�ir r!I;r• ~•`t: i-tl _, _ I,` il''i,711r1ilt. t• �I• I-�- -i.!' I��'j.!ill�'ii 11I I. - .!, �•�}- :I'i ijj �'t)t li- ..ir,I.ir.:�.a! � tail'. �.'� ( - ''I� i I 'l. t�li' I' +Il .)7] � ij:•K,1� .:�'�• .�: •t. !.I' I' - i 11 �;t�. . I II�•y�:!'�(I• ;FE ��;j',I'.i;'r' I ' - _ l;l..i.,.1 - •. _ ii�, Ii. ;�R '•E•oly.���• Ills I;C' ,-r_i.`_ :f �'i: i, -I'�III! L,`!• i :,Cli;hC i€� la . `?` — 1;i.jl J( y ( 4 = l l'-!.; tIi_i 'LLl11JI11.•� '�i N.-. '1- _ {:7 I.!•'!.7•-. l — - r- -- -T-- -Fri !,I' , ir— --:a_'1l l-�.� ...: ri i � il!'i;=j;iICIIII,�•7T!�ji!' it �]])`a I' : � III'' � I `u�11!!.� (�t}`)� --I - --- -- --• -- — - -=__ ... I n l � i i i I 5�� •� � I I! -��-- I•'l ,l � I Are-R Fw<,-„r lODAW/}IiD Cr A"Ouxom, �:''`�-v tJ z ` .:............ .......... i J - 13' 7' r Ff- if : .I 1. li I - -- -- �? ri Ej I i I j i „ i 0 r .1-. •U. .!•.4y_I + _.._.--- .t.i ;_--_-�- :^' f.ro r r.c 1 . e n.s ICI j I i I i I ` N 1 II 1 I 1 L o t -►----,: �' I �� —f � _—___-_ r. r Ir �•• ,. i w li ae..rr a..t: _ ,.., _. ._ -i------` -'� _.�1_ - _ — �•.j 1 ,. �1'\ I.IT r 11 ��' 1001 'M1•� .,...,.. I . I r 11, • . i .,,.,I ) I Y . ; i -� --E. I I 41 U eece r.ro. I I a = z i a.wu I 1 i �.• {1 -._, 1 I -17 1RE(Ff i1.Rl I I G . r 'i f� II y���� .......�I i I � a I w r , r � �.____..—__.__—__—_.__.__...., _.__._.. I _....._.... . . I• cam_ �rl'^ jc _ 9 0 .r.. U' � PQQ 62 L6OO n 16etRgm m PQ (DOG3 -� R 11 DON m RI RI RI 41 _4 R3 R3 CF—E MIS C 2 mi nx M71NE AJ RI 2 Rs m I CF—R R3 R3 :;JR31 R3 p mac.n. R3 R3 IJ I'll AM ��j :.�' --.;.. 3 Mi 3 R2 R C2 T R3 Cj .. 7 C4 0 m I . .... C4 R 3 4 R 2 is L fi WARNER R 2 0 P FIR OR y C4-MS= CAIN fl 0 ------- 10T SIC—OME cli C�j CF—E It Or R2 mi Mil > R2 DO R R2 :!,MI C —E RI P.1 CF , A (.:A,%*;:-"A,-,.-r ) DR m p M I M-NORELL DR SETT, m I m I • z R3 RI R3 C4 BANTO.DR, 3 ,n C I I 1 J1 R 11111 111. F— 1-il Iol 0 j..._-_.. .I ZC 92-2/ND 91-26 HUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION 7 1 7/ � q CITY OF HUNTINC•TON BEACH RtQUES`i' FOR LEGAL SERVICES RIS No. Gail Hutton, City Attorney Assn To ��► Date Date ".equest made by Telephone Department &?!%?(@ [Ray Silver, Asst. City Admin X1574 Administration INSTRUCTIONS: File request in the City Attorney's Office. Outline reasons for this request and state facts necessary for City Attorney to respond. Please attach all p ertinent information and exhibits. TYPE OF LEGAL SERVICES REQUESTED: [ ) Ordinance [ ] Opinion [ ] Stop Notice [ ] Resolution [ ] Lease [ ] Bond [ I Meeting [ ] Contract/Agreement [ ] Deed [ ] Court Appearance [ ] Insurance [X] Other Public Hearing Mai 1 i ng Is Request for Preparation of Contract form attached? [ ] Yes [ ] No Are exhibits attached? [XI Yes No If for Council action, If not for Council action, Signature of Department Head Agenda deadline desired completion date Council Meeting -111311 179 1992 COMMENTS: Routing: Please review before the July. 20th Council meeting and advise on the GCH possible need to redo the noticing and rehear the attached public hearing HISTORY PDA In January of this year, Council held a public hearing on a request for JCB a Zone Change related to 7511 Warner Ave. At that time, the request resulted in a tie vote and the Planning 'Commission's denial was therefore upheld. AJF With the city as applicant,the Zone Change was resubmitted to the S L Planning Commission in May. A public hearing on the Zone Change was held at the July 6th City Council meeting resulting in approval by the Council. The second reading is scheduled for the July 20 City Council ADL meeting. As indicated by the City Clerk's memo, the notification list utilized - -TM for the more recent application is not consistent with the original Zone Change and appears to be lacking the accessor's parcel list. WBS Please review all the attached material and advise on the need to re= RCS schedule the City Council and the Planning Commission hearings before further action by the Council at their July 20 meeting. WSA Thank you. This Request for Legal Services has been assigned to attorney telephone extension His/her secretary is , extension Keep the goldenrod copy for your files. Please reference the above RLS number for inquiries. Notes Filename Date completed: WP No. RCS 2/28/92 Rev. RENOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CHANGE NO. 92-2/ NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-26 (Rezone property from R2 [Medium Density Residential] to M1 [Limited Manufacturing] ) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, August 3, 1992, 7: 00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No. 92-2/Negative Declaration No. 91-26 APPLICANT: Olaf Smildzins (Peninsula Pump) LOCATION: 7511 Warner Avenue ZONE: R2 (Medium Density Residential) REQUEST: Rezone a 7,438 square foot (net) parcel of real property from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) . ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No. 91-26 has been prepared and advertised for a 21 day public comment period which expired on September 24, 1991. This Negative Declaration will also be considered by Council. COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library (7111 Talbert Avenue) after July 1, 1992 . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If there are any further questions please call Robert Franklin, Associate Planner at 536-5271. Connie Brockway City Clerk (3541d) RENOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CHANGE NO. 92-2/ NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-26 (Rezone property from R2 [Medium Density Residential] to M1 (Limited Manufacturing3 ) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, August 3 , 1992, 7:00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No. 92-2/Negative Declaration No. 91-26 APPLICANT: Olaf Smildzins (Peninsula Pump) LOCATION: 7511 Warner Avenue ZONE: R2 (Medium Density Residential) REQUEST: Rezone a 7,438 square foot (net) parcel of real property from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) . ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No. 91-26 has been prepared and advertised for a 21 day public comment period which expired on September 24, 1991. This Negative Declaration will also be considered by Council . COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library (7111 Talbert Avenue) after July 1, 1992 . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If there are any further questions please call Robert Franklin, Associate Planner at 536-5271. Connie Brockway City Clerk (3541d) O-ERG HEPPRICH JESSE J. GONZALES TUONG VAN THI PHAM 7252 WESTP.IDGE` LN . •7551 WASHINGTON AVE. LONG GIANG LAC AGUNA HILLS, CA 92653 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 7531 WARNER AVE. 11-360-13 , 14-4-010 142-211-53 04-010 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 ILLIAM F. LONGLEY NICHOLAS A. ROCCO PAULINE H. REIOUX 502 WARNER AVE. BRC. ASSOC 3131 MADEIRA AVE. UNTINGTON BEACH CA 13032 BIRCHWOOD ST. COSTA MESA, CA 92626 92647 GARDEN GROVE, CA 92643 11-360-15 04-010 142-211-54 04-010 142-212-23 04-010 AMES ANDREWS RUSH, TR LOUIS ORTIZ WARNER OLYMPIC ASSOCIATES 851 JARDINES DR. 16922 LYNDON ST. BELCORP ASSET MGNT GROUP UNTINGTON BEACH, CA HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 16892 GOTHARD ST. #D 92647 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92647 11-022-06 04-010 142-211-59 04-010 142-221-02 , 16 04-010 ENINSULA PUPMP & FRED SCHARF 'QUIPMENT INC. 3935 ELM AVE. -10 LITTLEFIELD AVE. LONG BEACH, CA 90807 ,0. SAN FRANCISCO,CA 42-211-02 04-010 . 94080 142-211-01 04-010 ;LION L . BERRY DOMINIC SCOLARO,TR '/0 CENTURY 21 i 7171 HEIL AVE 516 W. LINCOLN AVE. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA NAHEIM, CA 92801 92647 42-211-03 04-010 142-211-02 04-010 EHMAN-KELLEY COSTT. INC. MILLER,BARRY L . �f 516 W. LINCOLN AVE. P.O. BOX 3372 .NAHEIM, CA 92801 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 42-211-04 04-010 142-212-03 04-010 142-212 04 OHN R. CONTRERAS WILLIAM DALE NOORDMAN .6912 S. LYNDON ST. 7572 WASHINGTON AVE. iUNTINGTON BEACH, CA HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 92647 42-211-08 412-212-05 04-010 ,LVA LOU WOOD MICHAEL ACOSTA 2951 RHINEHART ST. 7582 E. WASHINGTON AVE, AKE ELSINORE, CA 92330 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 42-211-08 04-010 142-212-06 04-010 EVERN F . CARNAHAN LARRY M. MATSUI RC ASSOC 17401 BURCHIT CIR. 4062 BROADHORN DR. YORBA LINDA, CA AGUNA NIGUEL , CA 92677 142-212-16 , 17 04-010 42-211-09 04-010 .ELMUT E. BRAUN,TR 304 RINCON DR. A HABRA HEIGHTS, CA 90631 42-211-51 04-010 HELMA GRUBER FRANK TEPLITZKY '- 581 WASHINGTON AVE. .`-. UNTINGTON BEACH, CA 9738 EL DURANGO 92647 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92 42-211-53 04-010 142-212-18 04-010 AC62J301/FM CTL 0005223 05'-22-91 12 02 PM 1991-92 CITY/DISTRICT PARCEL LIST PAGE 436 DISTRICT NUMBER 054A HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME,AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE 111-360-12 HOHNSTEIN, PHILIP TR 111-371-03 RESK, JOAN M 111-371-10 RESK, JOAN M 04-010 P 0 BOX 4 026 04-010 1704 SHIPLEY LN 04-010 1704 SHIPLEY LN , HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 T 111-360-13 HEPPRICH, JOERG 111-371-04 SMIEJA, VITUS J 111-371-11 EBY, SIDNEY N 04-010 27252 WESTRIDGE LN 04-010 27250 MURRIETA RD H117 04-010 %SPRING REALTY LAGUNA HILLS, CA 92653 SUN CITY; CA 92381 4903 TORRANCE BLVD TORRANCE, CA 90503 t 111-360-14 HEPPRICH, JOERG 111-371-05 DAD, AN TANG 111-371-12 WILSON, DAVID E 04-010 27252 WESTRIDGE LN 04-010 PO BOX 2293 04-010 17402 MIRA LOMA LAGUNA HILLS, CA 92653 WESTMINSTER, CA 92683 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 111-360-15 LONGLEY, WILLIAM F 111-371-06 CRAIG, CATHY LEE 111-371-13 BOWEN, THELMA S 7 I 04-010 7502 WARNER AVE 04-010 613 SEAVIEW LN 04-010 6162 SONOMA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 111-360-16 HOHNSTEIN, PHILIP 111-371-07 CRAIG, CATHY LEE 111-371-14 ENGEL, DONALD J 04-010 17121 NICHOLS AVE 04-010 613 SEAVIEW LN 04-010 17283 BUTTONWOOD ST HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 111-371-01 L00, BRIAN HUM TR 111-371-08 SCHOENEBURG, BJARNE TR 111-371-15 MC KAY, MIKE D ET AL 04-010 8490 PEBBLE BEACH DR 04-010 16232 KEATS CIR 04-010 16242 REDWOOD ST BUENA PARK, CA 90621 WESTMINSTER, CA 92683 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 ib 111-371-02 RESK, JOAN M 111-371-09 HUSSNI, KAMRAN TR 111-371-16 RAFFERTY, RICHARD Q 04-010 1704 SHIPLEY LN 04-010 7752 SYCAMORE AVE #A 04-010 C/O RAFFERTY & LLOYD R D HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 28231 PASEO ANDANTE SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CA 92675' AC62J301/FM CTL 0005209 05-22-91 12:02 PM 1991-92 CITY/DISTRICT PARCEL LIST PAGE 422 DISTRICT NUMBER: 054A HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS_ CODE 111-010-55 ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO 111-010-78 CHEVRON USA INC 1.111-022-06 RUSH, JAMES ANDREWS TR I 04-007 PS&T TAX DEPT SS#06191-11 04-010 ATTN PROPERTY TAX DEPT 04-010 6851 JARDINES DR 4 P 0 BOX 2485 P 0 BOX 7611 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 LOS ANGELES, CA 90051 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94120 i 111-010-58 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 111-010-79 CHEVRON USA INC 111-022-07 CUNNINGHAM, ROY A 04-010 P 0 BOX 190 04-010 ATTN PROPERTY TAX DEPT 04-010 922 HYDE CT HUNTINGTN BCH, CA 92648 P 0 BOX 7611 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94120 111-010-64 YAMADA, TAKASHI TR 111-021-01 GRAEHL, MAX G 111-022-10 GOODMAN, WILLIAM C TR 04-010 8312 KINER AVE 04-010 233 VIOLET LN 04-010 6932 CHURCH CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 BAYFIELD, CO 81122 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 111-010-66 AGUILERA, JESUS 111-021-06 MARTINEZ, RUDOLPH 111-022-11 G P BUILDING ENTERPRISES 04-010 P 0 BOX 147 04-010 17052 GOTHARD ST 04-010 INC SUNSET BEACH, CA 90742 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 17032 PALMDALE ST NC HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 111-010-69 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 111-021-09 VELA, CHARLES W 111-023-15 MERENDA, FRANK ANTHONY 04-007 P 0 BOX 190 04-010 17051 PALMDALE ST 04-010 20332 BRENTSTONE HUNTINGTN BCH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 111-010-70 RANDALL, B WILLIAM TR 111-021-18 CHURCH, WARNER AVENUE 111-023-16 MERMELSTEIN, MELVIN 04-010 2 RUE DU PARC 04-010 BAPTIST 04-010 P 0 BOX 2300 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 7360 WARNER AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 HUNTINGTN BCH, CA 92647 111-010-71 TEXACO INC 111-021-19 TUCKER, JAMES E 111-023-17 CUCAMONGA INDUSTRIAL 04-010 RYAN, HILDE P 04-010 17031 PALMDALE ST 04-010 PROPERTIES P 0 BOX 5568 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 %FROME INVESTMENTS DENVER, CO 80217 2900 -A BRISTOL ST #201 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 AC62J301/FM CTL 0005265 05-22-91 12:02 PM 1991-92 CITY/DISTRICT PARCEL LIST PAGE 478 DISTRICT NUMBER: 054A HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE 142-191-43 HIX, RONALD R 142-211-09 BRC ASSOC -142-211-52 GRUBER, THELMA 04-010 P 0 BOX 2413 ' 04-010 %CARNAHAN, LEVERN F 04-010 7581 WASHINGTON AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 24062 BROADHORN DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 LAGUNA NIGUEL, CA 92677 142-202-01 WINDJAMMER APARTMENTS 142-211-12 TORRES, MANUEL 0 142-211-53 GONZALES, JESSE J 04-010 SUITE-700 E 04-010 7593 WASHINGTON AVE 04-010 7551 WASHINGTON AVE 4000 MAC ARTHUR BLVD HUNTINGTN BCH, CA 92647 HUNTINGTN BCH, CA 92647 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 142-211-02 PENINSULA PUMP & / 142-211-13 KOOP, GEORGE 142-211-54 BRC ASSOCIATES 04-010 EQUIPMENT INC 04-010 4733 DORCHESTER 04-010 ROCCO, A NICHOLAS 210 LITTLEFIELD AVE CORONA DEL MAR, CA 92625 13032 BIRCHWOOD ST f SO SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 GARDEN GROVE, CA 92643 - - - J 142-211 03. BERRY, ELTON L 142-211 19 CENTRAL BAPTIST TEMPLE 142-211 58 CENTRAL BAPTIST TEMPLE I 04-010 C/O CENTURY 21 THE AGENCY 04-010 INC 04-010 7661 WARNER AVE 2516 W LINCOLN AVE 7661 WARNER AVE HUNTINGTN BCH, CA 92647 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 HUNTINGTN BCH, CA 92647 142-211-04 LEHMAN-KELLEY 1.42-211-23 CENTRAL BAPTIST TEMPLE --M�pr142-211-59 ORTIZ, LOUIS 04-010 CONSTRUCTION INC 04-010 INC 1 04-010 16922 LYNDON ST 2516 W LINCOLN AVE 7661 WARNER AVE ,, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 HUNTINGTN BCH, CA 92647 , I I y 142-211-07 CONTRERAS, JOHN R 142-211-38 PENINSULA PUMP & 142-212-01 SCHARF, FRED 04-010 16912 S LYNDON ST 04-010 EQUIPMENT CO 04-010. 3935 ELM AVE HUNTINGTN BCH, CA 92647 210 LITTLEFIELD AVE LONG BEACH, CA 90807 iSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 142-211-08 WOOD, ELVA LOU � 142-211-51 BRAUN, HELMUT E TR 142-212-02 SCOLARO, DOMINIC TR 04 010 32951 RHINEHART ST 04-010 1304 RINCON DR 04-010 7171 HEIL AVE ` LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92330 LA HABRA HEIGHTS, CA 90631 / HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 AC62J301/FM CTL 0005266 05-22-91 12:02 PM 1991-92 CITY/DISTRICT PARCEL LIST PAGE 479 DISTRICT NUMBER: 054A HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA -NAME-AND-ADDRESS, CODE F3 MILLER, BARRY L 142-212-10 LU, KAU U 142-212-21 TINOCO, MARIO M P 0 BOX 3372 04-010 622.1 FOXSHIELD DR 04-010 8234 BIG BEAR CIR NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 BUENA PARK, CA 906214 MILLER, BARRY L 142-212-11 MONTERO, FRANK 142-212-22 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 700 LIDO PARK DR N20 04-010 14702 HARPER ST 04-010 2000 MAIN ST NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 MIDWAY CITY, CA 92655 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 142-212-05 NOORDMAN, WILLIAM DALE 'tea 142-212-16 MATSUI, LARRY M - `'�`y 142-212-23 REIOUX, PAULINE H 04-010 7572 WASHINGTON 04-010 17401 BURCHIT CIR 04-010 3131 MADEIRA AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 YORBA LINDA, CA 92686 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 142-212-06 ACOSTA, MICHAEL 142-212-17 MATSUI, LARRY M �� 142-221-02 WARNER OLYMPIC ASSOCIATES 04-010 7582 E WASHINGTON AVE 04-010 17401 BURCHIT CIR 04-007 BELCORP ASSET MGNT GROUP HUNTINGTN BCH, CA 92647 YORBA LINDA, CA 92686 16892 GOTHARD ST ND HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 142-212-07 HOFFMAN, GREGORY L `� 142-212-18 TEPLITZKY, FRANK 142-221-16 WARNER OLYMPIC ASSOCIATES 04-010 3854 CALLE DEL ESTABLO 04-010 9738 EL DURANGO 04-010 BELCORP ASSET MGNT GROUP SAN CLEMENTE, CA 92672 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 16892 GOTHARD ST ND' HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 142-212-08 SCARFONE, ANTHONY A TR - 142-212-19 TEPLITZKY, FRANK 142-231-08 WOHLER, WILLIAM A 04-010 BECERRA, JESUS TRUJILLO 04-010 9738 EL DURANGO 04-007 2136 SAN ANSELINE AVE 7602 WASHINGTON ST FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 LONG BEACH, CA 90815 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 142-212-09 SCARFONE, ANTHONY A TR 142-212-20 PHAM, TUONG VAN THI 142-231-09 CARLSON, JOHN R TR 04-010 17302 ELSINORE CIR 04-010 LY, LONG GIANG LAC 04-007 8942 PEBBLE BEACH CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 7531 WARNER ST WESTMINSTER, CA 92683 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 ;OERG7 HEPPRICH JESSE J. GONZALES TUONG VAN THI PHAM 0I 1.7252 WESTRIDGE LN. 7551 WASHINGTON AVE. LONG GIANG LAC 11 -AGUNA HILLS, ' CA 92653 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 7531 WARNER AVE. _11-360-13 , 14-4-010 142-211-53 04-01092647 HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92647 dILLIAM F. LONGLEY NICHOLAS A. ROCCO ' PAULINE H. REIOUX 7502 WARNER AVE. BRC. ASSOC 3131 MADEIRA AVE. ?UNTINGTON BEACH CA 13032 BIRCHWOOD ST. COSTA MESA, CA 92626 92647 GARDEN GROVE, CA 92643 111-360-15 04-010 142-211-54 04-010 142-212-23 04-010 JAMES ANDREWS RUSH, TR LOUIS ORTIZ WARNER OLYMPIC ASSOCIATES 5851 JARDINES DR. 16922 LYNDON ST. BELCORP ASSET MGNT GROUP HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 16892 GOTHARD ST. #D 92647 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 111-022-06 04-010 142-211-59 04-010 142-221-02, 16 04-010 PENINSULA PUPMP & FRED SCHARF Lt_zLrnar Olympic- EQUIPMENT INC. 3935 ELM AVE. I(.p 1 Doue- S+. O&s 210 LITTLEFIELD AVE. LONG BEACH, CA 90807 IU S0. SAN FRANCISCO,CA ¢cU�nT' 13e�`�+iCf}'9a,(ctop 142-211-02 04-010 94080 142-211-01 04-010 ELTON L . . BERRY DOMINIC SCOLARO,TR C/O CENTURY 21 7171 HEIL AVE 2516 W. LINCOLN AVE. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA ANAHEIM, CA 92801 92647 142-211-03 04-010 142-211-02 04-010 LEHMAN-KELLEY CONST. INC. MILLER►BARRY L . '2516 W. LINCOLN AVE. P.O. BOX 3372 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92663 142-211-04 04-010- 142-212-03 04-010 142-212 04 JOHN R. CONTRERAS WILLIAM DALE NOORDMAN 16912 S. LYNDON ST. 7572 WASHINGTON AVE. - - - - - HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92647 92647 142-211-08 412-212-05 04-010 ■M.i.t�I ELVA LOU WOOD MICHAEL ACOSTA 32951 RHINEHART ST. 7582 E. WASHINGTON AVE, LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92330 HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92647 142-211-08 04-010 142-212-06 04-010 - LEVERN F. CARNAHAN LARRY M. MATSUI BRC ASSOC 17401 BURCHIT CIR. 24062 BROADHORN DR. YORBA LINDA,CA LAGUNA NIGUEL , CA 92677 142-212-16 , 17 04-010 142-211-09 04-010 HELMUT E. BRAUN,TR 1304 RINCON DR. LA HABRA HEIGHTS, CA 90631 142-211-51 04-010 THELMA GRUBER FRANK TEPLITZKY 7581 WASHINGTON AVE. 9738 EL DURANGO ' HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 142-211-53 04-010 92647 142-212-18 04-010 �l3 . 1 v 142-211-52 142-211-53 ELIZABETH BAILEY JESSE J GON ES 7561 WASHINGTON 7551 WA TON AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUN N BEACH CA 92647 142-211-54 142-211-59 PHILLIP J ROCCO JR etal LOUIS 11 GENEV RTIZ LEVERN F CARNAHAN JR 16922 LYND ST 24062 BROADHORN DR HUNTI BEACH CA 92647 LAGUNA NIGUEL CA 92677 142-212-01 142-212-02 FRED & BEV SCHARF DOMONIC SCO O JR 3935 EL 7171 HEIL LON CH CA 90807 HUNTI ON BEACH CA 92647 142-212-03 142-212-04 BARRY L MI BARRY L R KATHRYN W MILLER PO BOX 2 700 LIDO PK DR :20 NEW P T BEACH CA 92663 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92663 142-212-05 142-212-16 DALE N OORDI AAN ;174 RRY Sul 7572 NGTON CHIT CIR H TON BEACH CA 92647 A LINDA CA 92686 14 2-212-17 142-212-18 LARRY F SUI FRANK & i PLITZKY 17401 CHIT CIR 9738 E GO Y LINDA CA 92686 FO N VALLEY CA 92708 142-212-19 142-212-20 FRANK & REBA TEPLITZKY TUO AN THI & KIM LONG PHA 9738 EL DURANGO 827 N AD DR FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 FULLERTON 46 • I qv 142-212-21 142-212-22 MARIO ICI DINOCO MORTON J THIEBAUD 8234 BIG BEAR CIR WINTERSBURG COMM WATER C/O J.SCOLARO BUENA PARK CA 90621 7532 WASHINGTON AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142- 1-02 142XLYWIPICS WARNE MPICS ASSOC WA3191 A AIRPOR OP 319COSTA MESA D CO 142-221-03 - - MIKE BERNHARDT RICHARD GUNN J L WEBB PLANNING INC PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD - 2900 BRISTOL ST STE F102 ONE MARKET PLAZA COSTA MESA CA 92626 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105 - OLAF SMILDZENS CLARENCE VICTORY PENINSULA PUMP CORP PENINSULA PUMP CORP 7511 WARNER AVE 20 LMLEFIELD AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94080 14 2-221-04 RICHARD GUNN PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD ONE MARKET PLAZA SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105 �l 111-022-06 111-022-07 JAMES ANDREWS JR ROYILYNETTE CUNNINGHAM 6851 JARDINE R 922 HYDE CT HUNTING BEACH CA 92647 COSTA MESA CA 92626 111-022-11 111-023-10 G P BUILDING ENTERPRISES INC RICKARD GUNN 17032 PALMDALE ST #C PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 ONE MARKET PLAZA SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105 111-360-03 111-360-13 WARNER AVENUE AUTO CENTER JOERG 11 ELE HEPPRICH 18321 VENTURA BLVD #715 _ 27 52 WE IDGE LN TARZANA CA 91356 LAG U ILLS CA 92653 111-360-14 111.360-15 JOERG& EL E HEPPRICH WILUAM F EY 27252 IDGE LN 7502 R AVE LAG HILLS CA 92653 HU TON BEACH CA 92647 14 2-211-03 142-211-04 ELTON L BERR KELLEY LEHIJ�AN C/O CEN iU 21 THE AGENCY CONSTRUCT NC 251 6 COW AVE 2516 W OLN AVE A II►A CA 92801 CA 92801 142-211-07 142-211-08 JOHN R CONTRERAS ELVA LOU W 16912 S LYN DON ST 32951 RH KARTT - HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 LAKE INORE CA 92330 142-211-09 142-211-51 BRC ASSOCIATES E HELM U N JR C/O LEVERN F CARNAHAN 1304 6N DR 24062 BROADHORN DR ,ABRA HEIGHTS CA 90631 LAGUNA NIGUEL CA 92677 PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST MAILING LABELS (1010D) 8/2C/90 ( V � H.B. Chamber of Commerce Huntington Beach Co. Ci f Westminster 2213 Main St. #32 2110 Main St. 8200 Wes inster Blvd. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Hunt. Bch., CA 92648-2499 Westminster, A 92683 Attn: Kim Barone Attn: William D. Holman Attn: Planning Dir. H.B./F.V, Board of Realtors Pres., Hist. Society City o al Beach 8101 Slater Ave. C/O Newland se Museum 211 Eight Huntington Beach, CA 92647 19820 Beach Blvd. Seal Beach, CA 0740 Attn: Board President Huntington Beach, CA 2648 Attn: Planning Dir. Ami s De Bolsa Chica Historical Resources Bd. CA Coasta mmission 15545 ter Lane Comm. Se es Dept. Theresa Henry Huntington Be CA 92649 2000 Main St. 245 W. Broadway, to 380 Attn: Preside Huntington Beach, C 648 long Bch. CA 9080 Attn: Chairperson Frien of the HB Wetlands Council Aging Caltrans 'strict 12 21902 Ki wa Lane 1706 Orange 2501 Pullman Huntington each, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, 92648" Santa Ana. CA 9 05 Attn: Charl Grant Attn: Robert Jose Coast Conservancy GXSt. m. Owners Leag. Director P.O. Box 4 11vdLocal Solid Waste Enf. Agy. Los Angeles. 0066 G92642 O.C. Health Care Agency Attn: Ruth Galant Aebury P.O. Box 355 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Huntington Beach Tomorrow County of Orange/EMA Dominick Tomaino 411 6th St. Michael Ruane, Dir. Seacliff Homeowners Assoc. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 P.O. Box 404 6812 Scenic Say Lane Attrr: President Santa Ana, CA 927 04.8 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 BI Coun Orange/EM4 2001 E. ' St. #224 Thomas Math Dir, Planning Huntington Harbor HOA Santa Ana. C 2705 P. 0. Box 4048 P. 0. Box 791 Attn: Julie Van rmost Santa Ana, CA 92702 048 Sunset Beach, CA 90742 SCAG County of range/EMA 818 W��el2th Floor Bob Fisher, Bill Lilly Los A017 P.O. Box 4048 HHHOA ARC Attn: Richard Spicer Santa Ana, CA 92702-40 16835 Algonquin St. #119 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 E.T. . Corrall 100 City of osta Mesa New Growth Coordinator Mary 1 P.O. Box 12 Huntington Beach Post Office 20292 Ea ood Cir. Costa Mesa, CA 8-1200 6771 Warner Ave. Huntington ch. CA 92646 Attn: Planning Dir. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Chai\Dev. Environmental Board City of Fou�Av alley Comm `Dept. 10200 Slate 2000 Main Sf� Fountain Valley, C 2708 Huntington Bea , CA 92648 Attn: Planning Dir. 13 142-211-52 Gruber, Thelma 7581 Washington Ave. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-211-54 BRC Associa s Nichola Rocco 1303 irchwood Street G en Grove, CA 92643 142-212-20 _ Pham, Tuong an Thi Ly. Long ane Lac -- - 7531 W ner Street Hunt ngion Beach, CA 92647 142-221-02 Warner Olympi ssoc. 7T, 55 j 16892 and St. #B 1 ho Doi(o. H i ngton Beach, CA 92647 142-212-22 City of Hun ' gton Beach 2000 Mai Street Hunt' gton Beach, CA 92648 142-221-16 Warner`Olympics Assoc. 16892 G�thard St. #B Huntingt Beach, CA 92647 r, SCHOOL DISTRICTS (//X Dr. Duane Dishno HB CITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT P. 0. Box 71 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 964-8888 DAVID HAGEN HB UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISRICT 10251 Yorktown Avenue Huntington Beach, CA 92646 964-3339 CSA = - -- 730 E1 Camino Way #200 Tustin, CA 9680 -~ RENOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CHANGE NO. 92-2/ NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-26 (Rezone property from R2 [Medium Density Residential] to SDI M1 [Limited Manufacturing]) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, August 17, 1992, 7:00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No. 92-2/Negative Declaration No. 91-26 APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach PROPERTY OWNER: Olaf Smildzins (Peninsula Pump) LOCATION: 7511 Warner Avenue ZONE: R2 (Medium Density Residential ) RE UEST: Rezone a 7,438 square foot (net) parcel of real property from R2 (Medium Density Residential ) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) . ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No. 91-26 has been prepared and advertised for a 21 day public comment period which expired on September 24, 1991 . This Negative Declaration will also be considered by Council . COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library (7111 Talbert Avenue) after July 1 , 1992. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If there are any further questions please call Robert Franklin, Associate Planner at 536-5271 . Connie Brockway City Clerk 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 536-5404 (2613k) RENOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CHANGE NO. 92-2/ NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-26 (Rezone property from R2 [Medium Density Residential] to M1 [Limited Manufacturing]) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, August 17, 1992, 7:00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No. 92-2/Negative Declaration No. 91-26 APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach PROPERTY OWNER: Olaf Smildzins (Peninsula Pump) LOCATION: 7511 Warner Avenue ZONE: R2 (Medium Density Residential ) RE UE T: Rezone a 7,438 square foot (net) parcel of real property from R2 (Medium Density Residential ) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) . ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No. 91-26 has been prepared and advertised for a 21 day public comment period which expired on September 24, 1991 . This Negative Declaration will also be considered by Council . COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library (7111 Talbert Avenue) after July 1 , 1992. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If there are any further questions please call Robert Franklin, Associate Planner at 536-5271 . Connie Brockway City Clerk 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 536-5404 (2613k) . 0 RECEIVED CITY CLERK 7/�O -/- ,ITY CF - • UN .CALIF. A.,6jui s � i 192 July 6, 1992 City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 Attn: Connie Brockway bear Ms Brockway: We have applied for a zone change (no. 92-2) which is scheduled for the City Council meeting of July 6, 1992. Due to unforseen circumstances which will result in a hardship for us, we request that our application be continued to the next regular scheduled Council meeting. Your understanding in this matter is greatly appreciated. If Z can be of any further assistance, Z can be reached at 80--8395 today. Sincerely yours, ti v Olaf mildzins CC: Mayor Jim Silva t_._ _ � c r x -a z C" -4 s n + r ,3 7511 Warner Avenue • Huntington Beach, CA 92647 (714) 848- 8395 7511 Warner Avenue Huntington Beach,CA 92647 City of Huntington beach l Office of the City Clerk 2000 Main Street 1 Huntington Beach, CA. 92648 Attn: Connie Brockway 4 I �• 4& City of Huntington Beach �i P.O.BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 From the desk of: CONNIE BROCKWAY � CITY CLERK 7-5 g lJaal(-vr e, #6V&Ul o� y.z- �'/2 g a 3 y - J 7 14 q alp ----------------- 9739 EO A,0,—r C-V 9alog 39355, qo,?6 7 �,�, 142 211=52 - lr .4 DR DUANE DISHNO NEW GROWTH COORDINATOR ELIZABETH BAILEY HB CITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DIST HUNTINGTON BEACH, R�'S' OFFICE 7561.WASHINGTON P.O. BOX 71 6771 WARNER AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA. 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 964-8888 142-211-54 DAVID HAGEN PHILLIP J ROCCO JR ETAL HB UNION HICH SCHOOL DISTRICT LEVERN F CARNAHAN 3R 10251 YORKTOWN AVE 24062 BROADHORN DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646 - LAGUNA NIGUEL CA 92677 964-3339 142-212-19 CSA 142-221-03, 04 FRANK & REBA TEPLITZKY 730 EL CAMINO WAY #200 RICHARD GUNN 9738 EL DURANGO TUSTIN, CA 92680 PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 ONE MARKET PLAZA SAN FRANCISCO - CA 94105 142-212-04 HB CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OLAF SMILDZENS BARRY L & KATHRYN W MILLER 2213 MAIN ST #32 PENINSULA PUMP CORP 700 LIDO PK DR #20 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 7511 WARNER AVE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92663 ATTN - ._ ;. ._,::. HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 111-022-11 HB/FV BOARD OF REAT,TORS 142-212-21 G P BUILDING ENTERPRISES INC 8101 SLATER AVE MARIO M DINOCO 17032 PALMDALE ST #C HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 8234 BIG BEAR CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 ATTN BOARD PRESIDENT BUENA PARK CA 90621 111-360-03 HUNTINGTON BEACH TOMORROW MIKE BERNHARDT WARNER AVENUE AUTO CENTER 411 6TH STREET J L WEBB PLANNING INC 18321 VENTURA BLVD #715 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 2900 BRISTOL ST STE F102 TARZANA CA 91356 ATTN PRESIDENT COSTA MESA CA 92626 142-211-07 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO CLARENCE VICTORY JOHN R. CONTRERAS 2110 MAIN ST PENINSULA PUMP CORP 16912 S LYNDON ST HUNT. BEACH CA 92648-2499 20 LITTLEFIELD AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 ATTN WILLIAM D. HOLMAN SAN FRANCISCO CA 94080 142-211-09 DIRECTOR BRC ASSOCIATES LOCAL SOLID WASTE ENF AGY 142-212-22 C/O LEVERN F CARNAHAN O.C. HEALTH CARE AGENCY MORTON J. THIEBAUD 24062 BROADHORN DR P.O. BOX 355 WINTERSBURG COMM WATER LAGUNA NIGUEL CA 92677 SANTA ANA, CA 92702 C/O J. SCOLARO 111-022-07 7532 WASHINGTON AVE ROY/LYNETTE CUNNINGHAM HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 922 HYDE CT COSTA MESA CA 92626 111-023-10 HUNTINGTON HARBOR HOA WARNER OLYMPIC RICHARD GUNN P.O. BOX 791 1601 DOVE ST #155 PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD SUNSET BEACH CA 90742 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 ONE MARKET PLAZA SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105 142-211-52 BILL LILLY DOMINICK TOMAINO GRUBER, THELMA HHHOA ARC SEACLIFF HOMEOWNERS ASSOC 7581 WASHINGTON AVE 16835 ALGONQUIN ST. #119 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 SCENIC BAY LANE HUNTINGTON INGTON BEACH CA 92648 30ERG HEPPRICHol JESSE J . GONZALES TUONG VAN THI PHAM 27252 WESTRIDGE LN. 7551 WASHINGTON AVE. LONG GIANG LAC LAGUNA HILLS , CA 92653 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 7531 -WARNER AVE. 111'=360-13 , 14-4-010. 92647 ` HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 9264 142-211-53 04-010 WILLIAM F. LONGLEY NICHOLAS A. ROCCO PAULINE H. REIOUX 7502 WARNER AVE. BRC. ASSOC - 3131"'MADEIRA AVE. HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 13032 BIRCHWOOD ST. ;; COSTA MESA, CA 92626 92647 GARDEN GROVE, CA 92643 111-360-15 04-010 142-211-54 04-010 142-212-23 04-010 JAMES ANDREWS RUSH, TR LOUIS ORTIZ .. WARNER OLYMPIC ASSOCIATES 6851 JARDINES DR. 16922 LYNDON ST. , BELCORP ASSET MGNT GROUP HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 16892 GOTHARD ST. #D 92647 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92647 111-022-06 04-010 142-211-59 04-010 142-221-02, 16 04-010 PENINSULA PUPMP & FRED SCHARF EQUIPMENT INC. 3935 ELM AVE. 210 LITTLEFIELD AVE. LONG BEACH,CA 90807 = SO. SAN FRANCISCO,CA 142-211-01 04-010 142-211-02 04-010 94080 ~� -- ELTON L . BERRY DOMINIC SCOLARO,TR C/O CENTURY 21 7171 HEIL AVE 2516 W. LINCOLN AVE. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA ANAHEIM, CA 92801 92647 142-211-03 04-010 142-211-02 04-010 LEHMAN-KELLEY CONST. INC. MILLER,BARRY L . 2516 W. LINCOLN AVE. P.O. BOX 3372 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92663 142-211-04 04-010 142-212-03 04-010 142-212 04 JOHN R. CONTRERAS WILLIAM DALE NOORDMAN 16912 S . LYNDON ST. 7572 WASHINGTON AVE. _ HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92647 92647 142-211-08 412-212-05 04-010 _ ELVA LOU WOOD MICHAEL ACOSTA _� - 32951 RHINEHART ST. 7582 E. WASHINGTON AVE, LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92330 HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92647 142-211-08 04-010 142-212-06 04-010 LEVERN F . CARNAHAN LARRY M. MATSUI BRC ASSOC 17401 BURCHIT CIR. 24062 BROADHORN DR. YORBA LINDA,CA LAGUNA NIGUEL , CA 92677 142-212-16, 17 04-010 142-211-09 04-010 HELMUT E. BRAUN ,TR 1304 RINCON DR. LA HABRA HEIGHTS, CA 90631 142-211-51 04-010 THELMA GRUBER ~ 7581 WASHINGTON AVE. FRANK TEPLITZKY _ HUNTINGTON BEACH , CA 9738 EL DURANGO ' 92647 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 142-211-53 04-010 142-212-16 04-010 r STATE OF CAUFORNIA County of Orange I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not.a party to or interested in the below entitled matter. 1 am a principal clerk of the HUNTINGTON BEACH _ INDEPENDENT a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of Califomia. and that attached Notice is a true and complete copy as was printed and published in PUBLIC NOTICE the Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley RENOTIFICATION OFHEARING PUBLIC NOTICES issues of said newspaper to wit the issue(s)of: PUBLIC ZONE CHANGE scribed below. DATE/TIME: Monday, Au- NO.92.2 gust 3,1992,7:00 PM NEGATIVE APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No. 92-2/ DECLARATION Negative Declaration No. NO.91.26 91-26 - (Rezone property APPLICANT: Olaf from R2 Smildzins (Peninsula July 23 , 1992 (Medium Pump) Density LOCATION: 7511 Warner Avenue Residentlal)to ZONE: R2 (Medium Den- M1 (Limited sity Residential) Manufacturing)) REOUEST: Rezone a NOTICE IS HEREBY 7,438 square foot(net)par- GIVEN that the Huntington cel of real property from R2 Beach City Council will (Medium Density. Residen- hold a public hearing in the tial) to M1 (Limited Manu• Council Chamber at the facturing). Huntington Beach Civic ENVIRONMENTAL STA- Center, 2000 Main Street, TUS: Negative Declaration Huntington Beach, Califor- No. 91-26 has been pre- nia, on the date and at the pared and advertised for a time indicated below to re. 21 day public comment pe- ceive and consider the riod which expired on Sep- statements of all persons tember 24, 1991.This Neg- who wish to be heard rela- alive Declaration will also jive to the application de-. be considered by Council. COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the in the Community Develop- ment Department, 2000 foregoing is true and correct. Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the pub- lic. A_copy of the staff re- Executed on July 23 199 2 port will be available to in. terested parties at City Hall, at Costa Mesa, Califomia. or the Main City Library J?ui 1- 19bbert Avenue) after ALL 'INTERESTED PER- SONS are Invited at attend ZZ said hearing and express opinions or submit evi- Slgnature dence for or against the application as outlined above. If there are any fur- ther questions please call Robert Franklin, Associate Planner at 536-5271. Connie Brockway, City Clerk Published Huntington Beach. Independent July PROOF OF PUBLICATION 23,1992 074.964 . JOERG HEPPRICH JESSE J. GONZALES TUONG VAN THI PHAM 272'52 WESTRIDGE LN. ! 7551 WASHINGTON AVE. LONG GIANG LAC LAGUNA HILLS, CA 92653 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 7531 .WARNER AVE. 111-360-13 , 14=4-010 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92647 — ---- - 142-211-53 04-010 -- I - -- - -- -- -- WILLIAM F . LONGLEY NICHOLAS A. ROCCO � PAULINE H. REIOUX 7502 WARNER AVE. BRC. ASSOC 3131 ' MADEIRA AVE. HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 13032 BIRCHWOOD ST. COSTA MESA, CA 92626 92647 GARDEN GROVE, CA 92643 111-360-15 04-010 142-211-54 04-010 142-212-23 04-010 JAMES ANDREWS RUSH, TR LOUIS ORTIZ WARNER OLYMPIC ASSOCIATES 6851 JARDINES DR. 16922 LYNDON ST. IBELCORP ASSET MGNT GROUP HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 16892 GOTHARD ST. #D 92647 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 111-022-06 04-010 142-211-59 04-010 , 142-221-02 , 16 04-010 PENINSULA PUPMP & FRED SCHARF Dl Y,AP' C EQUIPMENT INC. 3935 ELM AVE. O I _Doug 210 LITTLEFIELD AVE. LONG BEACH,CA 90807 SO. SAN FRANCISCO,CA � �P f,�,u�� �2�.��►i�'9a(o�0 142-211-01 04-010 142-211-02 04-010 94080 ELTON L . BERRY DOMINIC SCOLARO,TR C/O CENTURY 21 7171 HEIL AVE 2516 W. LINCOLN AVE. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA ANAHEIM, CA 92801 92647 142-211-03 04-010 142-211-02 04-010 LEHMAN-KELLEY CONST. INC. MILLER,BARRY L . 2516 W. LINCOLN AVE. P.O. BOX 3372 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92663 142-211-04 04-010 142-212-03 04-010 142-212 04 JOHN R. CONTRERAS WILLIAM DALE NOORDMAN 16912 S. LYNDON ST. 7572 WASHINGTON AVE. - - - HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA -92647 =-- 92647 142-211-08 412-212-05 04-010 ELVA LOU WOOD MICHAEL ACOSTA 32951 RHINEHART ST. 7582 E. WASHINGTON AVE, LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92330 HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92647 142-211-08 04-010 142-212-06 04-010 LEVERN F. CARNAHAN LARRY M. MATSUI BRC ASSOC 17401 BURCHIT CIR. 24062 BROADHORN DR. YORBA LINDA,CA LAGUNA NIGUEL , CA 92677 142-212-16 , 17 04-010 142-211-09 04-010 HEaL/MUT E. BRAUN,TR 1304 RINCON DR. LA HABRA HEIGHTS, CA 90631 142-211-51 04-010 THELMA GRUBER FRANK TEPLITZKY - 7581 WASHINGTON AVE. :' 9738 EL DURANGO " - - HUNTINGTON BEACH, 'CA FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 142-211-53 04-010 92647 142-212-18 04-010 " I v 'C/142-212-21 '--1'42-212-22 MARIO M DINOCO MORTON J THIEBAUD 8234 BIG BEAR CIR WINTERSBURG COMM WATER C/O J.SCOLARO BUENA PARK CA 90621 7532 WASHINGTON AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 d142- 1-02 142- 1-1 6 WARNE MPICS ASSOC WARNE LYMPICS ASS 3191 A AIRPOR OP 3191 A AIR T LO DR COSTA MESA D COSTA MESA 92626 "42-221-03 - MIKE BERNHARDT RICHARD GUNN J L WEBB PLANNING INC / 'PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD 2900 BRISTOL ST STE F102 ONE MARKET PLAZA COSTA MESA CA 92626 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105 - OLAF SMILDZENS CLARENCE VICTORY PENINSULA PUMP CORP PENINSULA. PUMP CORP 7511 WARNER AVE 20 LITTLEFIELD AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94080 U•42-221-04 RICHARD GUNN PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD ONE MARKET PLAZA SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105 PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST :i MAILING LABELS �n/ (1010D) 8/20/90 I V H.B. Chamber of Commerce Huntington Beach Co. Ci f Westminster 2213 Main St. #32 2110 Main St. 8200 Wes inster Blvd. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Hunt. Bch., CA 92648-2499 Westminster, A 92683 Attn: Km m-Barone- Attn: William D. Holman Attn: Planni g Dir. H.B./F.V. Board of Realtors V Pres., Hist. Society City o al Beach 8101 Slater Ave. C/O Newland se Museum 211 Eight Huntington Beach, CA 92647 19820 Beach Blvd. Seal Beach, CA 0740 Attn: Board President Huntington Beach, CA 2648 Attn: Planning Dir. Ami s De Bolsa Chica Historical Resources Bd. CA Coasta fission 15545 ter Lane Comm. Se es Dept. Theresa Henry Huntington Be CA 92649 2000 Main St. 245 W. Broadway, to 380 Attn: Preside Huntington Beach, C 648 Long Bch, CA 9080 Attn: Chairperson Frien of the HB Wetlands Council Aging Caltrans strict 12 21902 Ki wa Lane 1706 Orange 2501 Pullman Huntington each, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, 92648 Santa Ana, CA 9 05 Attn: Charl Grant Attn: Robert Jose Coast Conservancy GoXSt. m. Owners Leag. Director P.O. Box 4 11vd. Local Solid Waste Enf. Aqy. Los Angeles, C 0066 G92642 O.C. Health Care Agency Attn: Ruth Galant Aebury P.O. Box 355 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Huntington Beach Tomorrow County of Orange/EMA Dominick Tomaino 411 6th St. Michael Ruane, Dir. Seacliff Homeowners Assoc. / Huntington Beach, CA 92648 P.O. Box 404 6812 Scenic Bay lane Attn: President Santa Ana, CA 927 048 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 BI Coun Orange/EMA 2001 E. St. #224 Thomas Math Dir, Planning Huntington Harbor HOA Santa Ana, 2705 P. 0. Box 4048 P. 0. Box 791 / Attn: Julie Van nnost Santa Ana, CA 92702 048 Sunset Beach, CA 90742 SCAG County of range/EMA 811 West 12th Floor Bob Fisher, Bill Lilly Los Angeles, C 0017 P.O.- Box 4048 HHHOA ARC Attn: Richard Spicer Santa Ana, CA 92702-40 16835 Algonquin St. if119 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 E.T. . Corrall 100 City of osta Mesa New Growth Coordinator Mary 1 P.O. Box 12 20292 Ea ood Cir. Costa Mesa, CA 8-1200 Huntington Beach Post Office Huntington ch. CA 92646 Attn: Planning Dir. 6771 Warner Ave. / Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Chairm Environmental Board - City of Foul in Valley Comm. Dev. Dept. 10200 Slater Av 2000 Main S� Fountain Valley, C 2708 Huntington Beao�i, CA 92648 Attn: Planning Dir. 1 � 142-211-52 / Gruber, Thelma 7581 Washington Ave. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-211-54 BRC Associ s Nichola Rocco 1303 irchwood Street G en Grove, CA 92643 142-212-20 Pham/ngton an Thi Ly, e Lac 7531treet Huntach, CA 92647 \� 142-221-02 Warner Olympi s�C - 16892� and St. #B LO 0 -00✓ H ngton Beach, CA 92647 '/�� �T f ��,�_�.v.Gc p 142-212-22 City of Hun ' gton Beach 2000 Mai treet Hunt' gton Beach, CA 92648 142- 21-16 Warne Olympics Assoc. 16892 thard St. #B Huntingt Beach, CA 92647 SCHOOL DISTRICTS G��a (1211D) Dr. Duane Dishno / HB CITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT P. 0. Box 71 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 964-8888 DAVID HAGEN HB UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISRICT 10251 Yorktown Avenue Huntington Beach, CA 92646 964-3339 CSA 730 E1 Camino Way #200 Tustin, CA 9680 2 1 111-022-06 111-022-07 JAMES ANDREWS JR ROYILYNETTE CUNNINGHAM 6851 JARDINE R 922 HYDE CT HUNTINgTON BEACH CA 92647 COSTA MESA CA 92626 111-022-11 111-023-10 G P BUILDING ENTERPRISES INC RICHARD GUNN 17032 PALMDALE ST #C PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD / HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 ONE MARKET PLAZA SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105 111-360-03 111-360-13 WARNER AVENUE AUTO CENTER JOERG& ELE HEPPRICH 18321 VENTURA BLVD #715 272�2 WE IDGE LN TARZANA CA 91356 LAG U ILLS CA 92653 111-360-14 111-360-15 JOERG& EL E HEPPRICH WILLIAM F EY 27252 IDGE LN 7502 R AVE LAG HILLS CA 92653 HU TON BEACH CA 92647 142-211-03 I� 142-211-04 ELTON L BER KELLEY LEHMAN C/0 CENTU 21 THE AGENCY CONSTRUCT NC 2516 COLN AVE 2516 W OLN AVE A IM CA 92801 CA 92801 142-211-07 142-211-08 JOHN R CONTRERAS i ELVA LOU W 16912 S LYNDON ST 32951 RH ART ST HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 LAKE INORE CA 92330 142-211-09 142-211-51 BRC ASSOCIATES E.HELM N JR C/O LEVERN F CARNAHAN 1304 N DR 24062 BROADHORN DR ABRA HEIGHTS CA 90631 LAGUNA NIGUEL CA 92677 V(/142-211-52 A142-211-53 ELIZABETH BAILEY JESSE J GON -ES 7561 WASHINGTON 7551 WA ON AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUN N BE CA 92647 142-211-54 l' P/142-211-59 PHILLIP J ROCCO JR etal LOUIS & GENEV RTIZ LEVERN F CARNAHAN JR 16922 LYND ST 24062 BROADHORN DR HUNTI BEACH CA 92647 LAGUNA NIGUEL CA 92677 '/142-212-01 _142-212-02 - FRED & BEV SCHARF DOMONIC SCO O JR 3935 EL 7171 HEIL LON CH CA 90807 HUNTI ON BEACH CA 92647 142-212-03 142-212-04 BARRY L Ml BARRY L & KATHRYN W MILLER PO BOX 2 700 LIDO PK DR 4"1120 / NEW P T BEACH CA 92663 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92663 142-212-05 M 42-212-16 ,f DALE WI OORDMAN LARRY SUI 7572 NGTON 174 CHIT C I R H GTON BEACH CA 92647 XIWIA LINDA CA 926B6 W142-212-17 M142-212-18 LARRY SUI FRANK & PLITZKY 17401 CHIT CIR 9738 E ANGO Y LiNDA CA 92686 FO N VALLEY CA 92708 L142-212-19 fi 142-212-20 l� FRANK & REBA TEPLITZKY f TUO AN THI & KIM LONG PHA 9738 EL DURANGO 827 N AD A DR FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 FULLERTON SCHOOL DISTRICTS 12110). Dr. Duane Dishno HB CITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT P. 0. Box 71 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 964-8888 DAVID HAGEN HB UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISRICT 10251 Yorktown Avenue Huntington Beach, CA 92646 964-3339 CSA 730 E1 Camino Way #200 Tustin, CA 9680 L PP 142-211-52 Gruber, Thelma 7581 Washington Ave. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-211-54 BRC Associates Nicholas A. Rocco 13032 Birchwood Street Garden Grove, CA 92643 142-212-20 Pham, Tuong Van Thi Ly, Long Giane Lac 7531 Warner Street Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-221-02 Warner Olympics Assoc. Sty, t55 j 16892 Gothard St. #B 11*0 r0od� �}^ ° Huntington Beach, CA 92647 (l%p 142-212-22 City of Hun . gton Beach 2000 Mai Street Hunt' gton Beach, CA 92648 142n'2'1-16 Warne Olympics Assoc. 16892 thard St. #B Huntingt Beach, CA 92647 PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF • PUBLIC HEARING ZONE 92-22/ NO. 2.22/ STATE OF CALIFORNIA NEGATIVE j DECLARATIONNO.91-26 (Rezone propertyfrom R2 �v County of Orange (Medium p I Densityp�'a Residential) I am a Citizen of the United States and a to M1 (Limited resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the Manufacturing)) I NOTICE IS HEREBY ` age of eighteen years, and not a party to or GIVEN that the Huntington �wM.��� Beach City Council will ��I"`"'"'VVV ��,wv interested in the below entitled matter. I am a hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the principal cleric of the HUNTINGTON BEACH Center,gton 2000BManh Street INDEPENDENT, a newspaper of general Huntington Beach, Califor- nia, on the date and at the circulation printed and published in the City of time indicated below to re- ceive and consider the County of all persons Huntington Beach, Co unty of Orange, State of who wish to be heard rela- Ca ifomia,and that aftached Notice is a true and five scribed the application de- ed below. DATE/TIME: Monday, July ' complete copy as was printed and published in 6, 1992,7:00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: the Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley Zone Change No. 92-2/ Negative Declaration No. issues of said newspaper to wit the issue(s) of: 91-26 APPLICANT: Olaf Smlldzins (Peninsula Pump) LOCATION: 7511 Warner Avenue ZONE: R2 (Medium Den. June 25, 1992 sity Residential) REOUEST: Rezone a 7,438 square foot(net)par- cel of real property from R2 (Medium Density Residen- tial) to Mt (Limited Manu facturing) ENVIRONMENTAL STA- TUS: Negative Declaration No. 91-26 has been pre- pared and advertised for a 21 day public comment pe- riod which expired on Sep- tember 24, 1991.This Neg., ative Declaration will also be Considered by Council. COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Develop- ment Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, insp I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the for lic. A co copcyon by the pub- of the staff re- port will be available to in- foregoing is true and correcL terested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library (7111 Talbert Avenue) after July 1,1992. Executed on June 25 ' 199 2 ALL INTERESTED PER- SONS are invited at attend at Costa Mes Cafifomia. said hearing and express a, opinions or submit evi- dence for or against the application as outlined above. If there are any fur- ther questions please call Signature Planner Franklin, Associate Planner at 536-5271. Connie Brockway, City Clerk, City of Hun.. tington Beach Published Huntington Beach Independent June 25,1992 064-872 PROOF OF PUBLICATION 3 FE CITY' OF' HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER•DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH TO: Mike Adams, Community Development Director FROM: Connie Brockway, City Clerk SUBJECT: 7/6/92 PUBLIC HEARING RE: OLAF SMILDZINS (PENINSULA PUMP) ZONE CHANGE— 7511 WARNER AVENUE DATE: July 15, 1992 In the process of combining the two zone case files it was found that the (1/92) public hearing and (7/92) public hearing had different mailing lists. The 1/92 file has a much longer A.P.# mailing list of property owners (approximately 36 A.P.#s). At this last hearing at which time the zone change was approved only approximately 5 A.P.#s were provided for mailing. Please see attached label copies and advise through the City Attorney as to whether this discrepancy affects the ordinance which is on the 7/20/92 agenda to be printed today. CC: City Attorney 1362K ruoL:l, ntAK1NV NUTiFiGAiiUN �MELKLibl f MAILING LABELS ( ` (1010D) 8/20/90 1 A H.B. Chamber of Commerce Huntington Beach Co. City f Westminster 2213 Main St. #32 2110 Main St. 8 0 tm' ster Blv Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Hunt. Bch. , CA 92648-2499 st t r, C 2 3 Attn: Kim Barone Attn: William 0. Holman t n i r. H.B./F.V. Board of Realtors P es. H . Hist. Society Ci y f Seal each 8101 Slater Ave. 0 e d us Mu u 1 WV74� Huntington Beach, CA 92647 8 8 v 1Attn: Board President i t n B a h, 64 t r. Am os De is Chica Hi t is R sources Bd. WheteH ssion 15 45 m e !La a Comm er ices Dept.H tin to a ch CA 264 0 i S 380 e i n t o a , C 2 8 : 1 r on F fiend of the H8 Wetlands C c o Aging 1t ",, A 2 2 902 io L .e 1 0 e Ave. O1 H ;r.ti t 6 ch, 9 64 u ng 64S nA t C rl r A C 1 onservancy Gol en t. b. Owne Leag. /y'2 �1�' '2 P O 664 Aaln 1 V , gn 1 a d. rph4"�-"�oyfq � -%77 i LX _ A 264 Lor. vLAtr } L' a 6 G r e r g G10.h r� to R ,t t a L' tl bu y 75731 I, c,'Pn2; {r )4k1r,+0*� 3eA&,4,C 4 Huntington Beach Tomorrow County of Orange/EMA /yZ ZZ I -tq.)fG 411 6th St. Michael Ruane, Dir. wa`rrt.r O1.!„%f*Pas Assam. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 P.O. Box 048 btkorp A4--+ j 14rit-6mvio Attn: President Santa Ana, CA 92702-4048 16892 Go'�'ti..✓c� 6 '—OC County of Orange/EMA 200 . 4th St. #224 Thomas Mathews, Dir, Planning Santa A CA 92705 P. 0. ox 4048 - `f�✓ Attn: 3u1, Vandermost Santa A CA 92702-4048 `1 r SCAG County of Orange/EMA 818 We 7th, 12th Floor Bob Fisher, Dir. Los Ange CA 90017 P.O. ox 4048 Attn: Rich d Spicer Santa a, CA 92702-4048 r' � V�v E.T.I. Corrall 100 C ty CAsta a Mary Bell P x 200 20292 Eastwood Cir. C st e C 92 28— 0 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 tn, ni g Di . Chairman, Environmental Board Ci of o V ey Comm. Dev. Dept. 1 1 t v 2000 Main St. F n a V l 2 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 A n la i D 1 111-022-06 111-022-07 JAMES ANDREWS RUSH JR ROY/LYNETTE CUNNINGHAM 6851 JARDINES DR 922 HYDE CT HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 COSTA MESA CA 92626 111-022-11 111-023-10 G P BUILDING ENTERPRISES INC RICHARD GUNN 17032 PALMDALE ST #C PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 ONE MARKET PLAZA SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105 111-360-03 111-360-13 WARNER AVENUE AUTO CENTER JOERG& ELENORE HEPPRICH 18321 VENTURA BLVD #715 27252 WESTRIDGE LN TARZANA CA 91356 LAGUNA HILLS CA 92653 111-360-14 111-360-15 JOERG& ELENORE HEPPRICH WILLIAM F LONGLEY 27252 WESTRIDGE LN 7502 WARNER AVE LAGUNA HILLS CA 92653 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-211-03 - 142-211-04 - --- ELTON L BERRY KELLEY LEHMAN C/O CENTURY 21 THE AGENCY CONSTRUCTION INC . 2516 W LINCOLN AVE 2516 W LINCOLN AVE ANAHEIM CA 92801 ANAHEIM CA 92801 142-211-07 142-211-08 _ JOHN R CONTRERAS ELVA LOU WOOD 16912 S LYNDON ST 32951 RHINEHART ST HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 LAKE ELSINORE CA 92330 142-211-09 142-211-51 BRC ASSOCIATES E.HELMUT BRAUN JR C/O LEVERN F CARNAHAN 1304 RINCON DR 24062 BROADHORN DR LA HABRA HEIGHTS CA 90631 LAGUNA NIGUEL CA 92677 142-21 1-52 142-211-53 ELIZABETH BAILEY JESSE J GONZALES 7561 WASHINGTON 7551 WASHINGTON AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-211-54 142-211.59 PHILLIP J ROCCO JR etal LOUIS & GENEVA ORTIZ LEVERN F CARNAHAN JR 16922 LYNDON ST 24062 BROADHORN DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 LAGUNA NIGUEL CA 92677 142-212-01 - _ 142-212-02 FRED & BEVERLY SCHARF DOMONIC SCOLARO JR 3935 ELM AVE 7171 HEIL AVE LONG BEACH CA 90807 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-212-03 142-212-04 BARRY L MILLER BARRY L & KATHRYN W MILLER PO BOX 3372 700 LIDO PK DR #20 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92663 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92663 142-212-05 142-212-16 DALE WILLIAM NOORDMAN LARRY M MATSUI 7572 WASHINGTON 17401 BURCHIT CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 YORBA LINDA CA 92686 142-212-17 142-212-18 LARRY M MATSUI FRANK & REBA TEPLITZKY 17401 BURCHIT CIR 9738 EL DURANGO YORBA LINDA . CA 92686 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 142-212-19 142-212-20 FRANK & REBA TEPLITZKY TUO AN THI & KIM LONG PHA 9738 EL DURANGO 827 N AD A DR FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 FULLERTON 142-212-21 142-212-22 MARIO M DINOCO MORTON J THIEBAUD 8234 BIG BEAR CIR WINTERSBURG COMM WATER C/O J.SCOLARO BUENA PARK CA 90621 7532 WASHINGTON AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142- 1-02 142- 1-16 WARNE>AIRPORP SSOC WARNE LYMPICS ASS 3191 A 3191 A AIR T L DR COSTA COSTA MESA 92626 142-221-03 MIKE BERNHARDT RICHARD GUNN J L WEBB PLANNING INC PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD 2900 BRISTOL ST STE F102 ONE MARKET PLAZA COSTA MESA CA 92626 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105 OLAF SMILDZENS CLARENCE VICTORY PENINSULA PUMP CORP PENINSULA PUMP CORP 7511 WARNER AVE 20 LITTLEFIELD AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94080 142-221-04 RICHARD GUNN PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD ONE MARKET PLAZA SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105 142-211-52 Gruber, Thelma 7581 Washington Ave. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-211-54 BRC Associates Nicholas A. Rocco 13032 Birchwood Street Garden Grove. CA 92643 142-212-20 Pham, Tuong Van Thi Ly. Long Giane Lac 7531 Warner Street Huntington Beach. CA 92647 ,\pia 142-221-02 Warner Olympics Assoc. I&-U_ 155 c 16892 Gothard St. #B 1 C90 oo✓!. $}- Huntington Beach. CA 92647 142-212-22 City of Hun gton Beach 2000 Ha' treet C Hunt' gton Beach. CA 92648 ` CJ I � 142- 21-16 Warne Olympics Assoc. 16892 thard St. #B L G Huntingt Beach, -CA 92647 ' PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST MAILING LABELS • (1211,D) 5/19/91 President William D. Holman Planni Director H.B. Chamber of Commerce Huntington Beach Co. City of estminster 2213 Main St. #32 2110 Main St. 8200 WestINnster Blvd. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Hunt. Bch., CA 92648-2499 Westminster, CA 92683 Board President Pres.. Hist. Society Plannin Director H.B./F.V. Board of Realtors C/O New lan ouse Museum . City of S 1 Beach 8101 Slater Ave. 19820 Beach 8 211 Eight Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Seal Beach, 90740 P\*dt Chairpe on CA oastal fission Bolsa Chica Historic Resources Bd. ther a ry1uter Lane foam. Sery ces Oept. 245 W adway. to 380 H Beach, CA 92649 2000 Main St Lon Bch, 02 Huntington Bea CA 92648 C rles Grant Robert oseph Frie s of the HS Wetlands Counc on Aging Caltrans 'strict 12 21902 Ki a Lane 1706 Or ge Ave. -2501 Pullma St. Huntington each. CA 92646 Huntingto Beach, CA 92648 Santa Ana. CA 2705 R Galanter, Edna ittlebury Director Cons 1 Conservancy Golden t. Mob. Hm. Owners Leag. Local Solid Waste Enf. Agy. P.O. Bo 66494 11021 Ma lia Blvd. O.C. Health Care Agency Los Angel CA 90066 Garden Grove, CA 92642 P.O. Box 355 Santa Ana, CA 92702 President Coun of Orange/EMA Dominick Tomaino Huntington Beach Tomorrow Michae - Ruane. Oir. Seacliff Homeowners Assoc. 411 6th St. P.O. Box 48 6912 Scenic Bay Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Santa Ana. 92702-4048 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 3uli Vandermost SIA-0 County f Orange/EMA Huntington Harbor HOA 2001 E. 4th St. #224 Thomas M hews, Dir. Planning P. 0. Box 791 Santa An CA 92705 P. 0. Box 48 Sunset Beach, CA 90742 Santa Ana, CA 92702-4048 Ri and Spicer SCA Count of Orange/EMA Bill Lilly 818\Angt 7th, 12th Floor Bob Fish Dir. HHHOA ARC Loses, CA 90017 P.O. Box 8 16835 Algonquin St. #119 Santa Ana, CA 92702-4048 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 E T\2Eiitwood I Corral 100 Pla ing Dir. New Growth Coordinator M City Costa Mesa Huntington Beach Post Office 2 Cir. P. 0. B 1200 6771 Warner Ave. Hn Beach, CA 92646 Costa Mesa, CA 92628-1200 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Cha'rman, Environmental Board P1 ning Oir. Comm. ev. Dept. Cit of Fountain Valley 2000 Mai St. 10200 later Ave. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Fount Valley, CA 92708 PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST MAILING LABELS V j (10100) 8/20/90 1 H.B. Chamber of Commerce Huntington Beach Co. Ci f Westminster 2213 Main St. #32 2110 Main St. 8200 We ins Blvd. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Hunt. Bch., CA 92648-2499 Westminster, 92683 Attn: Kim Barone Attn: William D. Holman Attn: Planni g Dir. H.B./F.V. Board of Realtors Pres.. Hist. Society City o al Beach 8101 Slater Ave. C/O Newland se Museum 211 Eight Huntington, Beach, CA 92647 19820 Beach Blvd. Seal Beach, CA 0740 Attn: Board President Huntington Beach, CA 648 Attn: Planning Dir. Ami ps De Solsa Chica Historical Resources Sd. CA Coasta ission 15545 ter lane Comm. Se es Dept. Theresa Henry Huntington Be CA 92649 2000 Main St. 245 W. Broadway, to 380 Attn: Preside Huntington Beach, 648 Long Bch. CA 9080 Attn: Chairperson Fri en of the HB Wetlands Council Aging Caltrans strict 12 21902 Ki wa Lane 1706 Orange 2501 Pullman Huntington each. CA 92646 Huntington Beach, 92648 Santa Ana. CA 9 OS Attn: Char Grant Attn: Robert Jose Coast-, Conservancy Golde St. Mob. Fin. Owners Leag. P.O. Box 4 11021 Ma lia Blvd. Los Angeles. 0066 Garden Grov CA 92642 Attn: Ruth Galan Attn: Edna Li lebury Huntington Beach Tomorrow County of Orange/EMA 411 6th St. Michael Ruane. Dir. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 P.O. Box 404 _ Attn: President Santa Ana, CA 927 048 BI Co un Orange/EMA _ 2001 E. St. I1224 Thomas Math Dir, Planning Santa Ana, 2705 P. 0. Box 4048 Attn: Julie Van rmost Santa Ana, CA 92702 048 SCAG County of range/EMA 818 West 12th Floor Bob Fisher, Los Angeles, 0017 P.O. Box 4048 Attn: Richard Spicer Santa Ana, CA 92702-40 E.T. . Corrall 100 City of-.Costa Mesa Mary 1 P.O. Box 1208-1 20292 Ea ood Cir. Costa Mesa, CA 8-1200 Huntington ch. CA 92646 Attn: Planning Dir. -Chai\Dev. Environmental Board - City of Fou in Valley Comm Dept. 10200 Slater AY 2000 Main S, Fountain Valley, C 2708 Huntington Beao�i, CA 92648 Attn: Planning Dir. . SCHOOL DISTRICTS Dr. Duane Dishno HS CITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT P. 0. Box 71 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 964-8888 DAVID HAGEN HB UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISRICT 10251 Yorktown Avenue Huntington Beach, CA 92646 964-3339 CSA - 730 E1 Camino way #200 Tustin. CA 9680 ". NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CHANGE NO. 92-2/ NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-26 (Rezone property from R2 [Medium Density Residential] to M1 [Limited Manufacturing] ) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, July 6, 1992, 7:00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No. 92-2/Negative Declaration No. 91-26 APPLICANT: Olaf Smildzins (Peninsula Pump) LOCATION: 7511 Warner Avenue ZONE: R2 (Medium Density Residential) REOUEST: Rezone a 7,438 square foot (net) parcel of real property from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) . ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No. 91-26 has been prepared and advertised for a 21 day public comment period which expired on September 24, 1991. This Negative Declaration will also be considered by Council. COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library (7111 Talbert Avenue) after July 1, 1992. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If there are any further questions please call Robert Franklin, Associate Planner at 536-5271. Connie Brockway City Clerk (3541d) c Lill 26 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CHANGE NO. 92-2/ NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-26 (Rezone property from R2 (Medium Density Residential] to M1 [Limited Manufacturing] ) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, July 6, 1992, 7:00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No. 92-2/Negative Declaration No. 91-26 APPLICANT: Olaf Smildzins (Peninsula Pump) LOCATION: 7511 Warner Avenue ZONE: R2 (Medium Density Residential) REOUEST: Rezone a 7,438 square foot (net) parcel of real property from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) . ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No. 91-26 has been prepared and advertised for a 21 day public comment period which expired on September 24, 1991. This Negative Declaration will also be considered by Council . COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library (7111 Talbert Avenue) after July 1, 1992 . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If there are any further questions please call Robert Franklin, Associate Planner at 536-5271. Connie Brockway City Clerk (3541d) c PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST MAILING LABELS (IOIOD) 8/20/90 H.B. Chamber of Commerce Huntington Beach Co. City f Westminster 2213 Main St. #32 2110 Main St. 8 0 tm' ster Blv Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Hunt. Bch. , CA 92648-2499 st t r, C 2 3 Attn: Kim Barone Attn: William D. Holman t n i r. H.B./F.V. Board of Realtors P S. H B. Hist. Society Ci y f Seal each 8101 Slater Ave. O e d us Mu u 1 S Huntington Beach, CA 92647 i B v 1 h, C A74 Attn: Board President n i t n B a h, A 64 t P ni Dir. Am os De is Chica Hi t is R sources Bd. WH 15 45 mp a . La a Comm er ices Dept. JeWe H tin to a ch CA 264 0 i S 380 t IP e i n t o a C 2 8 , r on F iend of the HB Wetlands *co ng It a s ist i t 12 2 902 io L ne e. O1 Pu an St Hr:ti t B ch, A964 C [64 Sn n A9 0 A 2 C . rl e r A ob Jo ep C 1 onservancy Gol en Wad. Leag. �`�� �12 Z P�0 664 4 1 1 L.�.L e CA 066 r e �.or% vLAG, 5 9Gtah� to R t al n er t 7531 1�✓QJ"I S '� v }�tir►{�w�D'1 gta►ejt� G4 9 2.GY� Huntington Beach Tomorrow County of Orange/EM4 411 6th St. Michael Ruane, Dir. wad~� 0'%/^ fc-s Assam. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 P.O. Box 048 WC-Orr A�+PM9»T'6MVID Attn: President Santa Ana, CA 92702-4048 1659�- �`ro �� b B -OC County of Orange/EMA 200 4th St. #224 Thomas Mathews, Dir, Planning Santa A CA 92705 P. 0.\ox 4048 Attn: Jul, Vandermost Santa , CA 92702-4048 SCAG County of Orange/EMA 818 We 7th, 12th Floor Bob Fisher, Dir. L"os An9e s, CA 90017 P.O.% ox 4048 Attn: Rich d Spicer Santa a, CA 92702-4048 E.T.I. Corrall 100 C ty sta a Mary Bell P x 200 20292 Eastwood Cir. st e , C 92 28- 0 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 tn. ni g Di . Chairman, Environmental Board Ci of o n V ey Comm. Dev. Dept. 1 1 t v 2000 Main St. F n a V 1 2 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 A n la i D i� 111-022-06 111-022-07 JAMES ANDREWS RUSH JR ROY/LYNETTE CUNNINGHAM 6851 JARDINES DR 922 HYDE CT HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 COSTA MESA CA 92626 111-022-11 111-023-10 G P BUILDING ENTERPRISES INC RICHARD GUNN 17032 PALMDALE ST #C PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 ONE MARKET PLAZA SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105 111-360-03 111-360-13 WARNER AVENUE AUTO CENTER JOERG& ELENORE HEPPRICH 18321 VENTURA BLVD #715 27252 WESTRIDGE LN TARZANA CA 91356 LAGUNA HILLS CA 92653 111-360-14 111-360-15 JOERG& ELENORE HEPPRICH WILLIAM F LONGLEY 27252 WESTRIDGE LN 7502 WARNER AVE LAGUNA HILLS CA 92653 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-211-03 142-211-04 ELTON L BERRY KELLEY LEHMAN C/O CENTURY 21 THE AGENCY CONSTRUCTION INC 2516 W LINCOLN AVE 2516 W LINCOLN AVE ANAHEIM CA 92801 ANAHEIM CA 92801 142-211-07 142-211-08 JOHN R CONTRERAS ELVA LOU WOOD 16912 S LYNDON ST 32951 RHINEHART ST HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 LAKE ELSINORE CA 92330 142-211-09 142-211-51 BRC ASSOCIATES E.HELMUT BRAUN JR C/O LEVERN F CARNAHAN 1304 RINCON DR 24062 BROADHORN DR LA HABRA HEIGHTS CA 90631 LAGUNA NIGUEL CA 92677 142-211;52 142-211-53 ELIZABETH BAILEY JESSE J GONZALES 7561 WASHINGTON 7551 WASHINGTON AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-211-54 142-211-59 PHILLIP J ROCCO JR etal LOUIS & GENEVA ORTIZ LEVERN F CARNAHAN JR 16922 LYNDON ST 24062 BROADHORN DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 LAGUNA NIGUEL CA 92677 142-212-01 142-212-02 FRED & BEVERLY SCHARF DOMONIC SCOLARO JR 3935 ELM AVE 7171 HEIL AVE LONG BEACH CA 90807 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-212-03 142-212-04 BARRY L MILLER BARRY L & KATHRYN W MILLER PO BOX 3372 700 LIDO PK DR #20 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92663 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92663 142-212-05 142-212-16 DALE WILLIAM NOORDMAN LARRY M MATSUI 7572 WASHINGTON 17401 BURCHIT CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 YORBA LINDA CA 92686 142-212-17 142-212-18 LARRY M MATSUI FRANK & REBA TEPLITZKY 17401 BURCHIT CIR 9738 EL DURANGO YORBA LINDA CA 92686 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 142-212-19 142-212-20 - {� FRANK & REBA TEPLITZKY TUO AN THI & KIM LONG PHAt, 9738 EL DURANGO 827 N AD A DR FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 FULLERTON 142-212-21 142-212-22 MARIO M DINOCO MORTON J THIEBAUD 8234 BIG BEAR CIR WINTERSBURG COMM WATER C/O J.SCOLARO BUENA PARK CA 90621 7532 WASHINGTON AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142- 1-02 142- 1-16 WARNE MPICS ASSOC WARNE LYMPICS AS 3191 A AIRPOR OP 3191 A AIR T LO DR COSTA MESA D COSTA MESA 92626 142-221-03 - MIKE BERNHARDT RICHARD GUNN J L WEBB PLANNING INC PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD 2900 BRISTOL ST STE F102 ONE MARKET PLAZA COSTA MESA CA 92626 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105 OLAF SMILDZENS CLARENCE VICTORY PENINSULA PUMP CORP PENINSULA PUMP CORP 7511 WARNER AVE 20 LITTLEFIELD AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94080 142-221-04 RICHARD GUNN PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD ONE MARKET PLAZA SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105 M9" NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CHANGE NO. 92-2/ NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-26 (Rezone property from R2 [Medium Density Residential] to M1 [Limited Manufacturing] ) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, July 6, 1992, 7: 00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No . 92-2/Negative Declaration No. 91-26 APPLICANT: Olaf Smildzins (Peninsula Pump) LOCATION: 7511 Warner Avenue ZONE: R2 (Medium Density Residential) REOUEST: Rezone a 7,438 square foot (net) parcel of real property from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) . ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No. 91-26 has been prepared and advertised for a 21 day public comment period which expired on September 24, 1991. This Negative Declaration will also be considered by Council. COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library (7111 Talbert Avenue) after July 1, 1992 . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If there are any further questions please call Robert Franklin, Associate Planner at 536-5271. Connie Brockway City Clerk (3541d) c PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST MAILING LABELS (1010D) 8/20/90 H.B. Chamber of Commerce Huntington Beach Co. Ci f Westminster 2213 Main St. #32 2110 Main St. 8200 Wes inster Blvd. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Hunt. Bch., CA 92648-2499 Westminster, A 92683 Attn: Kim Barone Attn: William D. Holman Attn: Planni g Dir. H.B./F.V. Board of Realtors Pres., Hist. Society City o al Beach 8101 Slater Ave. C/O Newland se Museum 211 Eight Huntington Beach, CA 92647 19820 Beach Blvd. Seal Beach, CA 0740 Attn: Board President Huntington Beach, CA 2648 Attn: Planning Dir. Ami s De Bolsa Chic& Historical Resources Bd. CA Coasta ission 15545 ter Lane Comm. Se es Dept. Theresa Henry Huntington Be CA 92649 2000 Main St. 245 W. Broadway, to 380 Attn: Preside Huntington Beach, C 648 Long Bch, CA 9080 Attn: Chairperson Frien of the HB Wetlands Council Aging Caltrans 'strict 12 21902 Ki wa Lane 1706 Orange 2501 Pullman Huntington each, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, 92648 —- Santa Ana. CA 9 05 Attn: Chart Grant Attn: Robert Jose Coast Conservancy GXSt. m. Owners Leag. P.O. Box 4 11vd. Los Angeles, 0066 G92642 Attn: Ruth Galant Aebury Huntington Beach Tomorrow County of Orange/EMA 411 6th St. Michael Ruane, Dir. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 P.O. Box 40�927 Attn: President Santa Ana, 048 BI Coun Orange/EMA 2001 E. St. #224 Thomas Mat Dir, Planning Santa Ana, 2705 P. 0. Box 4048 Attn: Julie Van rmost Santa Ana, CA 92702 048 SCAG County of range/EMA 818 West 12th Floor Bob Fisher, Los Angeles, 0017 P.O. Box 4048 Attn: Richard Spicer Santa Ana, CA 92702-40 E.T. . Corrall 100 City of osta Mesa Mary 1 P.O. Box 12 20292 Ea ood Cir. Costa Mesa, CA 8-1200 Huntington ch. CA 92646 Attn: Planning Dir. -Chairm Environmental Board City of Fou in Valley Comm. Dev. Dept. 10200 Slater Av 2000 Main S� Fountain Valley, C 2708 Huntington Bea . CA 92648 Attn: Planning Dir. 142-211-52 Gruber, Thelma 7581 Washington Ave. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-211-54 BRC Associates Nicholas A. Rocco 13032 Birchwood Street Garden Grove, CA 92643 142-212-20 Pham, Tuong Van Thi Ly, Long Giane Lac 7531 Warner Street Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-221-02 Warner Olympics As 16892 Gothard St. #1B . ttv Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-212-22 City of Hun gton Beach 2000 Ma' treet Hunt' gton Beach, CA 92648 142-221-16 -41 Warner Olympics Assoc. 16892 Gothard St. #B Huntington Beach, CA 92647 PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST MAILING LABELS �O/a9/9a (1231D) 5/19/91 7�r President William D. Holman Planni Director H.B. Chamber of Commerce Huntington Beach Co. City of estminster 2213 Main St. #32 2110 Main St. 8200 Wes tlalnster Blvd. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Hunt. Bch., CA 92648-2499 Westminster, CA 92683 Board President Pres., Hist. Society Plannin Director H.B./F.V. Board of Realtors C/0 Newlan ouse Museum City of S 1 Beach 8101 Slater Ave. 19820 Beacfi B 211 Eight Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Seal Beach, 90740 P esident Chairpe on CA oastal ission Am, os De Bo1sa Chica Historic Resources Bd. Ther a my 15545 omputer Lane Comm. Sery ces Dept. 245 W oadway, to 380 Huntingt Beach, CA 92649 2000 Main St Lon Bch, 9 02 Huntington Bea CA 92648 C rles Grant Robert oseph Frie s of the HB Wetlands Counc on Aging Caltrans 'strict 12 21902 Ki a Lane 1706 Or ge Ave. 2501 Pullma St. Huntington each, CA 92646 Huntingto Beach, CA 92648 Santa Ana, CA 2705 R Galanter Edna ittlebury Director Co as 1 Conservancy Golden t. Mob. Hm. Owners Leag. Local Solid Waste Enf. Agy. P.O. Bo 66494 11021 Ma lia Blvd. O.C. Health Care Agency Los Angel CA 90066 Garden Grove. CA 92642 P.O. Box 355 Santa Ana, CA 92702 President Coun of Orange/EMA Dominick Tomaino Huntington Beach Tomorrow Michae Ruane, Dir. Seacliff Homeowners Assoc. 411 6th St. P.O. Box 48 6812 Scenic Bay Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Santa Ana, 92702-4048 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Juli Vandermost BIA-0 County f Orange/EMA Huntington Harbor HOA 2001 E. 4th St. #224 Thomas M hews, Dir, Planning P. 0. Box 791 Santa An CA 92705 P. 0. Box 48 Sunset Beach, CA 90742 Santa Ana, CA 92702-4048 Ri and Spicer SCA Count of Orange/EMA Bill Lilly 818\Angt 7th. 12th Floor Bob Fish , Dir. HHHOA ARC Loses, CA 90017 P.O. Box 4 8 16835 Algonquin St. #119 Santa Ana, CA 92702-4048 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 E T\2Ei�stwood I Corral 100 Pla ing Dir. New Growth Coordinator MBe City Costa Mesa Huntington Beach Post Office 2 Cir. P. 0. B 1200 6771 Warner Ave. Hn Beach, CA 92646 Costa Mesa, CA 92628-1200 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Chairman, Environmental Board PI ning Dir. Comm. ev. Dept. Cit of Fountain Valley 2000 Mai St. 10200 later Ave. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Fountai Valley. CA 92708 • SCHOOL DISTRICTS (1211D) Dr. Duane Dishno HB CITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT P. 0. Box 71 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 964-8888 DAVID HAGEN HB UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISRICT 10251 Yorktown Avenue Huntington Beach, CA 92646 964-3339 CSA 730 E1 Camino Way #200 Tustin. CA 9680 r 142-211-52 Gruber, Thelma 7581 Washington Ave. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-211-54 BRC Associates Nicholas A. Rocco 13032 Birchwood Street Garden Grove, CA 92643 142-212-20 Pham, Tuong Van Thi Ly, Long Giane Lac 7531 Warner Street Huntington Beach, CA 92647 \�`a 142-221-02 Warner Olympics Assoc. Site. 155 j 16892 Gothard St. #B (Vo Do✓G Huntington Beach, CA 92647 �/ r,Q, r f�.�-c�C-�- �}Z{f (r O 142-212-22 City of Hun ' gton Beach 2000 Mai treet Hunt gton Beach, CA 92648 141- 21-16 Warne Olympics Assoc. 16892 thard St. #B Huntingt Beach, CA 92647 +----------+-----------------------------------+--------+---+---+--------+ s + Category + Label CC/MS/PO S +BOX+EXP DATE+ ;. + Subject + +MF +DES DATE+ +----------+-----------------------------------+--------+---+---+--------+ SM 450.20 ZC 91-4 Olaf Smildzins (Peninsula A Pump) -ND 91-26-Ord 3129 7511 Warner Ave-No Action Taken 2311 CSCSA +50, L0 - :i-C 2 /►.� (-. Z(O� +----------+-----------------------------------+--------+---+---+--------+ SM 450 . 20 ZC 83-6 M 119 121 Applicant: DOUGLAS O. SMITH Location: Inland side of PCH-approx 350 ft SE of Admiralty 2013 Action date: 7/5/83 - +----------+-----------------------------------+--------+---+---+--------+ SO 450 . 20 ZC 77-27 M 118 121 Applicant: ROSELLE L. SOMMER Location: S/o Talbert, 450 ft W/o Beach-Action date: 12/12/77 1921 +----------+-----------------------------------+--------+---+---+--------- More output follows - press [Cancel ] to quit, any key to continue �3 FILE GUIDE Please file this document in: Category: Label : Established file New file - see Other: 0846I NOTICE OF `PUBL'IC HEARING ZONE CHANGE NO. 92-2/ NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-26 (Rezone property from R2 [Medium Density Residential] to M1 [Limited Manufacturing] ) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, July 6, 1992, 7: 00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No. 92-2/Negative Declaration No. 91-26 APPLICANT: Olaf Smildzins (Peninsula Pump) LOCATION: 7511 Warner Avenue ZONE: R2 (Medium Density Residential) REQUEST: Rezone a 7,438 square foot (net) parcel of real property from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) . ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No. 91-26 has been prepared and advertised for a 21 day public comment period which expired on September 24, 1991. This Negative Declaration will also be considered by Council . COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library (7111 Talbert Avenue) after July 1, 1992 . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If there are any further questions please call Robert Franklin, Associate Planner at 536-5271. Connie Brockway City Clerk (3541d) C 1 b PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST MAILING LABELS (101 OD) 8/20/90 .. H.B. Chamber of Commerce Huntington Beach Co. Ci f Westminster 2213 Main St. #32 2110 Main St. 8200 Wes inster Blvd. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Hunt. Bch., CA 92648-2499 Westminster, A 92683 Attn: Kim Barone Attn: William D. Holman Attn: Planni g Dir. H.B./F.V. Board of Realtors v Pres., Hist. Society City o al Beach 8101 Slater Ave. C/O Newland se Museum 211 Eight Huntington Beach, CA 92647 19820 Beach Blvd. Seal Beach, CA 0740 Attn: Board President Huntington Beach, CA 2648 Attn: Planning Dir. Ami s De Bolsa Chica Historical Resources Bd. CA Coasta mmission 15545 ter Lane Comm. Se es Dept. Theresa Henry Huntington Be CA 92649 2000 Main St. 245 W. Broadway, to 380 Attn: Preside Huntington Beach, C 648 Long Bch, CA 9080 Attn: Chairperson Friend of the HB Wetlands Council Aging Caltrans 'strict 12 21902 Ki wa Lane 1706 Orange 2501 Pullman Huntington each, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, 92648 Santa Ana, CA 9 05 Attn: Chart Grant Attn: Robert Jose Coast Conservancy Golde St. Mob. Hm. Owners Leag. P.O. Box 4 11021 Ma lia Blvd. Los Angeles, C 0066 Garden Grov CA 92642 Attn: Ruth Galan Attn: Edna Li lebury Huntington Beach Tomorrow County of Orange/EMA. 411 6th St. Michael . Ruane, Dir. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 P.O. Box 404 Attn: President Santa Ana, �927048 BIAL< Cou Orange/EMA 2001 E. St. #224 Thomas Math Dir, Planning Santa Ana, C 2705 P. 0. Box 4048 Attn: Julie Van rmost Santa Ana, CA 92702 048 SCAG County of range/EMA 818 West 12th Floor Bob Fisher, Los Angeles, C 0017 P.O. Box 4048 Attn: Richard Spicer Santa Ana, CA 92702-40 E.T. . Corrall 100 City of osta Mesa Mary 1 P.O. Box 12 20292 Ea ood Cir. Costa Mesa, CA 8-1200 Huntington ch, CA 92646 Attn: Planning Dir. i Chairm Environmental Board - City of Foul in Valley Comm. Dev. Dept. 10200 Slater Av 2000 Main S Fountain Valley, C 2708 Huntington BeaN, CA 92648 Attn: Planning Dir. 142-211-52 Gruber, Thelma 7581 Washington Ave. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-211-54 BRC Associates Nicholas A. Rocco 13032 Birchwood Street Garden Grove, CA 92643 142-212-20 Pham, Tuong Van Thi Ly, Long Giane Lac 7531 Warner Street Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-221-02 Warner Olympics As 16892 Gothard St. #B Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-212-22 City of Hun ' gton Beach 2000 Mai treet Hunt' gton Beach, CA 92648 142-221-16 Warner Olympics Assoc. 16892 Gothard St. #B Huntington Beach, CA 92647 PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST p MAILING LABELS (1211D) 5/19/9'1 President William D. Holman Planni Director H.B. Chamber of Commerce Huntington Beach Co. City of estminster 2213 Main St. #32 2110 Main St. 8200 Wes nster Blvd. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Hunt. Bch., CA 92648-2499 Westminster, CA 92683 Board President Pres., Hist. Society Plannin Director H.B./F.V. Board of Realtors C/O Newlan ouse Museum City of S 1 Beach 8101 Slater Ave. 19820 Beach B 211 Eight Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Seal Beach, 90740 P esident Chairpe son CA oastal ission Ami os De Bolsa Chica Historic Resources Bd. Ther a my 15545 omputer Lane Comm. Sery ces Dept. 245 W oadway, to 380 Huntingto Beach, CA 92649 2000 Main St Lon Bch, 9 02 Huntington Bea CA 92648 C rles Grant Robert oseph Frie s of the HB Wetlands Counc on Aging Caltrans 'strict 12 21902 �KiaLane 1706 Or ge Ave. 2501 Pu11ma St. Huntineach, CA 92646 Huntingto Beach, CA 92648 Santa Ana, CA 2705 R Galanter Edna ittlebury Director Co as 1 Conservancy Golden t. Mob. Hm. Owners Leag. Local Solid Waste Enf. Agy. P.O. Bo 66494 110_1 Ma lia Blvd. O.C. Health Care Agency Los Angele CA 90066 Garden Grove, CA 92642 P.O. Box 355 Santa Ana, CA 92702 President Coun of Orange/EMA Dominick Tomaino Huntington Beach Tomorrow Michae Ruane, Dir. Seacliff Homeowners Assoc. 411 6th St. P.O. Box 48 6812 Scenic Bay Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Santa Ana, 92702-4048 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Juli Vandermost BIA-0 Cou\Mhews, ange/EMA Huntington Harbor HOA 2001 E. 4th St. #224 Tho Dir, Planning P. 0. Box 791 Santa An CA 92705 P. 48 Sunset Beach, CA 90742 Santa Ana, CA 92702-4048 Ri and Spicer SCA Cou\Fish ange/EMA Bill Lilly 818 W t 7th, 12th Floor BobDir. HHHOA ARC Los Ang es, CA 90017 P.O8 16835 Algonquin St. #119 Santa Ana, CA 92702-4048 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 E T.I. Corral 100 Pla ing Dir. New Growth Coordinator Ma Bell City Costa Mesa Huntington Beach Post Office 2029 Eastwood Cir. P. 0. 8 1200 6771 Warner Ave. Huntin on Beach, CA 92646 Costa Mesa, CA 92628-1200 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Cha'rman, Environmental Board P1 ning Dir. Comm. ev. Dept. Cit of Fountain Valley 2000 Mai St. 10200 later Ave. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Fountai Valley, CA 92708 I REQI�! T FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION /6/�a January 6, 1992 Date Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administr r Prepared by: Michael Adams, Director of Community Developmk Subject: ZONE CHANGE NO. 91-4/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-26 I1 A0 Aez� (.R. .3 V-4 Oit/i Consistent with Council Policy? Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: '25) 1 Transmitted for yQdr consideration is a request to change the zoning on an approxima ly 7, 500 square foot (net) parcel of property located at Warner Avenue from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) . RECOMMENDATION• Staff Recommendation: Motion to: "Approve Negative Declaration No. 91-26 and deny Zone Change No . 91-4 with findings . " (Suggested Findings for Denial contained in this report as Attachment No. 1) Planning Commission Recommendation: Motion to: S-7 i i "Approve Negative Declaration No. 91-26 ZdZone Change No. 91-4 with findings by adopting Ordinance No. which would rezone the property generally located at Warner Avenue from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) . " (Suggested Findings for Approval attached to this report as Attachment No. 2 . ) Planning Commission Action on October 22, 1991: "A MOTION WAS MADE BY KIRKLAND, SECOND BY BOURGUIGNON, TO APPROVE ZONE CHANGE NO. 91-4 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-26 WITH FINDINGS AND FORWARD TO CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL DETERMINATION, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Newman, Shomaker, Kirkland, Dettloff, Bourguignon, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: Richardson ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED �I =r ;.11;„iF! U3A1733>- PI O 5/85 ANALYSIS: Project Description This application is a request to rezone an approximately 7,500 square foot parcel from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) . The current use of the property is legal non-conforming in that Peninsula Pump and Equipment, an industrial use, is currently operating on the site. Current zoning allows only health and safety improvements to the property such as new roofing or driveways or, through a conditional use permit, an expansion of no more than 10%. The applicant proposes to demolish the existing structure on the site and construct a new industrial structure in its place. Since the current zoning and general plan designation on the site is residential and the applicant proposes more than minor modifications to the property, a zone change is required for the proposed new construction. General Plan Consistency Typically, a general plan amendment would be required in conjunction with a zone change in order to achieve consistency between the City' s General Plan and zoning designation. A general plan amendment is not necessary in this case, however, as the City' s General Plan exempts properties less than one (1) acre in area from the zoning/general plan consistency requirement . The subject site is approximately one-sixth (1/6) of an acre in size. Permitted Uses The current zoning on the site (R2) would permit a maximum of three (3) residential dwelling units . The proposed zoning would permit general industrial uses. The applicant has submitted conceptual plans of what they propose to construct on the site. Although the plans submitted by the applicant are not the subject of this application, staff has performed a preliminary review and determined that the plans, with a few modifications, could conform to the proposed M1 (Limited Manufacturing) development standards . If the zone change request is approved, the specific development request will require review by the Zoning Administrator through the parcel map and administrative review application process . Lot Size The property currently consists of two (2) lots which have a net area of approximately 7, 500 square feet. Generally, the minimum lot size for M1 properties is 10,000 square feet; however, smaller lot sizes are permitted if the parcel map is processed in conjunction with an administrative review to the Zoning Administrator. The purpose of this requirement is to allow the City to determine if the proposed improvements on the property can be adequately accommodated on the smaller lot size. If the City Council approves this zone change request, however, they would be making the determination that the smaller lot size is acceptable for an industrial use at the subject location. RCA - 1/6/92 -2- (1630d) r t t t Adjacent Land Uses The use of the properties within the immediate vicinity on the north side of Warner Avenue is generally multi-family residential with a few single-family dwellings. The condition of the housing varies to a large degree with many deteriorating properties as well as numerous new residential structures in the area. Directly to the north of the subject property, several new multi-family residential structures are under construction. Staff Concerns : Given the residential land use within the immediate vicinity, staff has several concerns regarding rezoning the property for industrial use. First, truck traffic to the site would be via Lyndon Street, a street designed to residential standards. Residential streets have a curb to curb width of 40 feet. After required dedications, Lyndon Street will have a curb to curb width of 40 feet . Typically, the City has required streets serving industrial uses to have a curb to curb width of 44 feet. Therefore, the proposed street will be 4 feet less in width than what is usually required to serve an industrial use. Second, noise created by truck traffic and as a result of an industrial use on the site may be detrimental to the residential properties within the vicinity of the property. As discussed above, the residential properties in the immediate vicinity of the property are in the process of recycling. For example, the two (2) properties directly adjacent to the property under consideration for the zone change have new duplexes on them. Staff is concerned that the intensification of the industrial use at the subject location may stunt or halt the recycling of the properties underway in the vicinity. It should be noted that while the current industrial use does not appear to negatively impact the residential properties, nothing would prevent the property from being sold or leased to a more typical industrial use that may be less compatible with the nearby residences . Finally, it should be noted that although properties have been rezoned by the City from a conforming general plan designation to a non-conforming designation in the past, the new use was always within the same general classification (i .e. , R1 to R2) . The City has never rezoned a property that conformed to the general plan to a completely different classification (i .e. , residential to industrial) . RCA - 1/6/92 -3- (1630d) Conclusion: Although approval of the subject zone change would provide a "quick fix" to the property by allowing the property owner to demolish a blighted tin structure and replace it with a more attractive building, staff believes that approval of the zone change request would, in the long term, be detrimental to the residential properties in the vicinity. The concept of permitting non-conforming uses to exist is based on the eventual recycling of the property to a conforming use. Staff believes that since the useful life of the structure has expired, the use of the property should be brought into conformance with the current zoning and general plan designations on the property. FUNDING SOURCE: Not applicable ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Motion to: "Approve Negative Declaration No. 91-26 and Zone Change No. 91-4 with findings . " ATTACHMENTS 1. Suggested Findings for Denial (staff recommendation) 2 . Findings for Approval (Planning Commission recommendation) 3 Draft Ordinance No. to amend Article 906 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code to rezone the subject property from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) 4 . Area Map 5 . Planning Commission Staff Report date October 22, 1991 6 . Draft Negative Declaration No. 91-26 7. Reduced conceptual site plan, floor plan and elevations . 8. Draft October 22, 1991 Planning Commission Minutes 9 . Applicant ' s Narrative MTU:MA:TR: jr RCA - 1/6/92 -4- (1630d) STAFF SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR DENIAL ZONE CHANGE NO. 91-4 1. The proposed zone change from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to Ml (Limited Manufacturing) does not conform with the land use designation of Medium Density Residential which permits only residential uses . 2 . The proposed zone change from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) is inconsistent with surrounding residential land uses . All other properties on Lyndon Street have a residential use. Additionally, duplexes are currently under construction on the parcels directly to the north of the site. 3 . The proposed zone change from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Industrial) would be incompatible with the adjacent residential properties to the north and east . Noise associated with industrial uses on the site as well as the potential truck traffic would be detrimental to the residential properties . (1662d) PLANNING COMMISSION SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL ZONE CHANGE NO, 91-4 1. Although proposed zone change from R2- M1 does not conform with the Land Use Element of the General Plan, the site is less than an acre and is exempt from the zoning/general plan consistancy requirement . 2 . The proposed zone change from R2 to M1 is consistent with the existing use of the property and is compatible with adjacent land uses . A 4o�� vneani �„ ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 9061 THEREOF TO PROVIDE FOR CHANGE OF ZONING FROM "MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL" TO "LIMITED MANUFACTURING" ON REAL PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WARNER AVENUE AND LYNDON STREET (ZONE CHANGE 91-4) WHEREAS, pursuant to the State Planning and Zoning Law, the Huntington Beach Planning Commission and Huntington Beach City Council have had separate public hearings relative to Zone Change No . 91-4 wherein both bodies have carefully considered all information presented at said hearings, and after due consideration of the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission and all evidence presented to said City Council, the City Council finds that such code amendment is proper. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does ordain as follows : SECTION 1. The following described real property, generally located on the northwest corner of Warner Avenue and Lyndon Street is hereby changed from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) : Parcel I Beginning at the southwest corner of the southeast quarter of Section 23, Township 5 south, Range 11 west, as shown ', 1 on Tract 179 recorded in Book 16, Page 42, Miscellaneous Maps, Records of Orange County; thence north 89026 ' 30" east 20 .00 feet along the south line of said quartersection to The True Point of Beginning; thence continuing north 85026 ' 30" east 110 . 00 feet; thence north 0033130" west 150 . 00 feet; thence south 89*26 ' 30" west 20 . 00 feet to the northeast corner of Lot 17 of said Tract 179; thence continuing south 89026 ' 30" west 90 . 00 feet along the north line of Lots 17 and 18, of said Tract to the northwest corner of said Lot 18; thence south 0033 ' 30" i east 120 . 00 feet along the wesC. line of said Lot 18 to the southwest corner of said Lot 18; thence continuing south 0033 ' 30" east 30 . 00 feet to The True Point of Beginning. SECTION 2 . The Director of Community Development is hereby directed to amend Section 9061, District Map 26 (Sectional District Map 23-5-11) to reflect Zone Change No . 91-4 described in Section 1 hereof. Copies of said district maps, as amended hereby are available for inspection in tha Office of the City Clerk. SECTION 3 . This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its passage. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California, at a regular meeting thereof held 2 on the day of 1992 . Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: "4 - City Clerk d City Attorney ,-z -13 -Gi ( REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED: City Administrator Director of Community Development 3 RI 00. R, c...sl F.- mi I RI RI R311R,) R3 R - C F E -1c MI, - c C 2 mi ml R2— m I --�-3—JJR3 j R R 2 CF-R R 3 ml ; C4- 0 R3 z C 2 R 2 TOU—SE o. R 2 L R 3 .8 R3 " R 0,/ R3 - m I R3 ...... ¢L RL R3 21? 4 j C4 l_. I' Y' _.._ .. J WARNER J C4-MSFIRR2 ,o CF-E ml W ml R 2 'o 03 CF-R CID— -1 R2 00 'i To Rl R CF-E 330 R3 OR Y9 TTY )AELL OR m I MI MI 7r RI R3 R3 R'- li OR. RI R 11 R I MrR I RI U�, ZZF r f ZC 91-04/ ND 91-26 Jj j M C09 HUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTINGTON REACH PLANNING DIVISION . huntington beach department of community development STAf f EPOR TO: Planning Commission FROM: Community Development DATE: October 22 , 1991 SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE NO. 91-4/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-26 APPLICANT: Olaf Smildzins (Peninsula Pump) , 7511 Warner Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA 92647 PROPERTY OWNER: Clarence Victory, 210 Littlefield Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94080 REQUEST: Rezone a 7,438 square foot parcel (net) of real property from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) . LOCATION: 7511 Warner Avenue DATE ACCEPTED: August 29 , 1991 ZONE: R2 (Medium Density Residential) GENERAL PLAN: Medium Density Residential EXISTING USE: Industrial (Legal Non-Conforming) ACREAGE: Approximately 7, 500 square feet . 1 . 0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Motion to : "Approve Negative Declaration No . Negative Declaration No . 91-26 and deny Zone Change No . 91-4 with findings and forward to City Council for final determination. " 2 . 0 GENERAL INFORMATION: Zone Change No . 91-4 in conjunction with Negative Declaration No . 91-26 is a request to change the zoning on a parcel of property from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) , so as to permit the property owner to construct an industrial building on the site. Atli �- A-FM-23C AftoAme-n+ # 5 1 3 . 0 SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS: North and East of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential ZONE: R2 (Medium Density Residential) LAND USE: Single Family Dwellings and Multi-Family Dwellings South of Subiect Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Industrial ZONE: M1 (Limited Manufacturing) LAND USE: Industrial West of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Industrial ZONE: M1 (Limited Manufacturing) LAND USE: Industrial 4 . 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Community Development advertised draft Negative Declaration No . 91-26 for twenty-one (21) days . 'A written recommendation for approval of the negative declaration was received from the Environmental Board and is attached to this report . The staff, in its initial study of the project , has recommended that a negative declaration be issued. Prior to any action on Zone Change No . 91-4 , it is necessary for the Planning Commission to review and act on Negative Declaration No. 90-26 . 5 . 0 COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable. 6 . 0 REDEVELOPMENT STATUS: Not applicable . 7 . 0 SPECIFIC PLAN: Not applicable. 8 . 0 SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE: Not applicable. 9 . 0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS : Project Description This application is a request to rezone an approximately 7, 500 square foot parcel from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) . The current use of the property is legal non-conforming in that Peninsula Pump and Equipment, an industrial use, is currently operating on the site. The applicant proposes to demolish the existing structure on the site and construct an industrial structure in its place. Since the current zoning and general plan designation on the site is residential, a zone change is required for the proposed new construction. Staff Report - 10/22/91 -2- (1112d) Analysis General Plan Consistency Typically, a General Plan amendment would be required in conjunction with a zone change in order to achieve consistency between the General Plan and zoning . A general plan amendment is not necessary in this case, however, as the City' s current general plan exempts properties less than one (1) acre in area from the zoning/general plan consistency requirement . The subject site is approximately one-sixth (1/6) of an acre in size. Permitted Uses The current zoning on the site (R2) would permit a maximum of three (3) residential dwelling units . The proposed zoning would permit a number of industrial uses . The applicant has submitted conceptual plans of what they propose to construct on the site. Although the plans submitted by the applicant are not the subject of this application, staff has performed a preliminary review and determined that the plans , with a few modifications, could conform to the proposed M1 (Limited Manufacturing) development standards . Lot Size The property currently consists of two (2) lots which have a net area of approximately 7, 500 square feet . Generally, the minimum lot size for M1 properties is 10, 000 square feet; however, smaller lot sizes are permitted if the parcel map is processed in conjunction with an administrative review to the Zoning Administrator . The purpose of this requirement is to allow the City to determine if the proposed improvements on the property can be adequately accommodated on the smaller lot size. If the Planning Commission approves this zone change request , however, they would be making the determination that the smaller lot size is acceptable. Adiacent Land Uses The use of the properties within the immediate vicinity on the north side of Warner Avenue is generally multi-family residential with a few single family dwellings . The condition of the housing varies to a large degree with many deteriorating properties as well as numerous new residential structures in the area . Directly to the north of the subject property, several new multi-family residential structures are under construction. Given the residential land use within the immediate vicinity, staff has several concerns regarding rezoning the property for industrial use. Staff Report - 10/22/91 -3- (1112d) Truck traffic to the site would be via Lyndon Street, a street designed to residential standards . Noise created by truck traffic and as a result of an industrial use on the site may be detrimental to the residential properties within the vicinity of the property. Also, the area currently provides "market rate affordable" housing . Although only a few potential units would be lost, rezoning of the property from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) could set a precedent and contribute to the loss of affordable housing within the City. Finally, it should be noted that although properties have been rezoned by the City from a conforming general plan designation to a non-conforming designation in the past, the new use was always within the same general classification (i . e. , R1 to R2) . The City has never rezoned a property that conformed to the general plan to a completely different classification (i .e. , residential to industrial) . 10 . 0 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Negative Declaration No . 91-26 and deny Zone Change No . 91-4 with the following findings and forward the application to the City Council for final determination. FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - ZONE CHANGE NO. 91-4 : 1 . The proposed zone change from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) does not conform with the land use designation of Medium Density Residential which permits only residential uses . 2 . The proposed zone change from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) is inconsistent with surrounding residential land uses . All other properties on Lyndon Street have a residential use. Additionally, duplexes are currently under construction on the parcels directly to the north of the site. 3 . The proposed zone change from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Industrial) would be inconsistent with Housing Element goals which are to provide for the housing needs of all economic segments of the community (Goal 2 . 0) . Rezoning the property from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) would eliminate three (3) potential "market rate" affordable units from the City' s projected housing stock. 4 . The proposed zone change from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Industrial) would be incompatible with the adjacent residential properties to the north and east . Noise associated with industrial uses on the site as well as the potential truck traffic would be detrimental to the residential properties . Staff Report - 10/22/91 -4- (1112d) 5 . Ingress and Egress to the site via Lyndon Street requires truck traffic on residential streets . Increased traffic noise and truck traffic would be incompatible with the residential character of the neighborhood, 11 . 0 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The Planning Commission may approve Negative Declaration No . 91-26 and Zone Change No . 91-4 with findings and conditions of approval and forward to the City Council for final action. ATTACHMENTS; 3 ., Redueed site plan, flleeLc plan and elevations- 4 . B a€€ Nega-Live No 9-i 26- 5-. A i d e•r ea:�i*Q F i RG1 i e g s and--r a n-j it i e g R -e f T p .., W . BraEt „_d}-eaeee to-arRnd AFtie1e 906—e€ the Huntington- QeQh Or-di n NG-e- r„ao to- rose-„e 4-he--subjeet--PFepeFty f Eefa R2 (Medlam a v- a xvv vvvv cc�—s vo xry MA: jl 1 Staff Report - 10/22/91 -5- m1112d) J 1J� CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 7"kJ INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINCTON BF.AC11 To Tom Rogers From Julie sugi Assistant Planner Assi t nt Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT August 29, 1991 Subject FORM NO. 91-26 Date Applicant: Olaf Smildens Request: A zone change of an approximately 8,100 square foot area from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Light Industrial). No development is proposed at this time. Subsequent development will be subject to a minimum of Tentative Parcel Map and Administrative Review approval and therefore will require additional review. Location: 7511 Warner Avenue (Northside of Warner Avenue between Lyndon and Gothard Streets) Background Staff has reviewed the environmental assessment form noted above and has determined that a negative declaration may be filed for the project. In view of this, a draft negative declaration was prepared and was published in the Daily Pilot for a twenty—one (21) day public review period commencing Tuesday, September 3, 1991 and ending Tuesday, September 24, 1991. If any comments regarding the draft negative declaration are received, you will be notified immediately. Recommendation The Environmental Assessment Committee recommends that the Planning Commission approve Negative Declaration No. 91-26 finding that the proposed project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment. JO:lp (0620d-2) (7 LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Notice is hereby given by the Department of Community Development, Planning Division of the City of Huntington Beach that the following Draft Negative Declaration requests have been prepared and will be submitted to the City of Huntington Beach Planning Commission for their consideration. The draft negative declarations will be availabe for public review and comment for twenty—one (21) days commencing Tuesday, September 3, 1991 . Draft Negative Declaration No. 91-19 in conjunction with Conditional Use Permit No. 91-1 is a request to construct a 20,185 sq. ft. expansion to an existing 5,720 sq. ft. church. The expansion consists of a 405 seat 1 1,850 sq. ft. new church, 7,230 sq. ft. of new classroom/adminstrative area, 400 sq. ft. of storage area, and a 1 ,105 sq. ft. adc'.ition to the new parish hall. The project also includes a request for joint use parking and special permit to allow a max 20% compact parking stalls. The clxrrch is located at 18631 Chapel Lane. Draft Negative Declaration No. 91-26 in conjunction with Zone Change No. 91-4 is request to amend the zoning on approximately 8,100 square foot area from R2 (Med:-:m Density Residential) to M1 (Light Industrial). No development is proposed at this 01--..e. The site is located at 7511 Warner Avenue. Copies of these requests are on file with the Department of Community Developme:-. City of I-luntington Beach, 2000 Main Street, I-lunti,igton Beach, California. Any person wishing to comment on these requests may do so in writing within twenty—one (21 ) (7.Ys of this notice by providing written comments to the Department of Community Development, Planning Division, P.O. Box 190, Huntington Beach, CA 92648. (0626d) 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 91-26 1 . Name of Proponent: Olaf Smildens Address : 7511 Warner Avenue Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Phone Number: (714) 848-8395 2. Date Checklist Submitted for Review: August 28, 1991 3. Concurrent Entitlement(s) : Zone Change No. 91-4 4, Project Location: 7511 Warner Avenue (Northside of Warner Avenue between Lyndon and Gothard Streets) . Project Description: A zone change of an approximately 8, 100 square foot area from R2 (Medium Density Residential ) to Ml (Light Industrial) . No development is proposed at this time. Subsequent development will be subject to a minimum of Tentative Parcel Map and Administrative Review approval and therefore will require additional review. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of answers are included after each subsection. ) Yes Maybe No 1 . Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or changes in geologic substructures? Y. b. Disruptions, displacements , compaction or overcovering of the soil? X Discussion: The project does not consist of any development at this time. Subsequent development, under the proposed zoning may result is some disruption, displacement, compaction and overcovering of soil . However, impacts associated with the disruption, displacement, compaction and overcovering of soil are not anticipated to be substantially different from those associated with development under existing zoning. Furthermore, soils impacts of future development will be project specific and will be addressed through the entitlement process. Future development will also be subject to standard conditions of approval which require submittal of a soils study and implementation of specifications contained therein; no significant impacts to earth conditions are anticipated to result from the proposed project. Yes Maybe No C. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? _ _ X d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? — _ X Discussion: The project site is primarily flat and does not contain any unique physical features. Any changes in topography proposed by subsequent development will be project specific and will be addressed through the entitlement process. e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? _ X Discussion: The project does not include any development at this time. Subsequent development of the site may result in short-`erm wind erosion impacts during the site preparation and construction phases. However, subsequent development will be subject to standard conditions of approval requiring implementation of dust control measures; no significant impact is anticipated. f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? _ X g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? X Discussion: The project is not located in the vicinity of the Alquist-Priolo Special Hazard Zone or any other known fault hazard; however, the site is located in an area of potential expansive soils as identified in the City's 1974 Geotechnical Inputs report. The proposed project does not consist of any development at this time. However, subsequent development will- be subject to standard conditions of approval which require submittal of soils reports and implementation of measures contained therein; no significant impacts are anticipated. 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? _ X Discussion: Short Term: The proposed project does not consist of any development at this time. However, subsequent development under the proposed zoning may result short-term emissions from construction equipment and grading activities. Short-term dust and pollutant emissions are not anticipated to be substantially different from those generated by development under the existing zoning. Subsequent development will be subject to standard conditions of approval requiring implementation of dust control measures and restriction of construction activities during second stage smog alerts and high ozone days . No significant impact is anticipated. Long Term: Subsequent development and operation of industrial uses on the site may result in emissions due to vehicle traffic and equipment/processes used on site. However, vehicle emissions resulting from subsequent development are not anticipated to be substantial ; future occupants of the site will be subject to standard conditions of approval which require prospective occupants to provide information on equipment/processes which may generate air pollutants to the South Coast Air Quality Management District for review and approval prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. No significant impacts are anticipated. b. The creation of objectionable odors? X Discussion: No development is proposed at this time. Industrial land uses, allowed by the proposed zoning, are more likely to generate fumes or odors than the multi-family uses allowed under the current zoning. The Environmental Checklist -2- (0527d) Yes Abe No project site is adjacent to multi—family residences to the north and south and adjacent to similar industrial uses to the south and west. However, subsequent development will be subject to additional review through the entitlement process and as discussed above, prospective occupants will be required to obtain SCAQMD approval prior to occupancy. C. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? — — X 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? X Discussion: The project site is currently occupied by a pump storage/repair business and is partially covered by impervious surfaces . No development is proposed at this time. However, subsequent development is anticipated to increase the amount of impervious surfaces on the site and will result in additional runoff from the site. Alternations to drainage patterns and run off resulting from subsequent development will also be project specific and will be addressed through the entitlement process . Subsequent development will be subject to standard conditions of approval requiring submittal of grading and hydraulic studies to insure that development will not adversely 'mpact drainage in the area. No significant impact is anticipated. C. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X e. Discharge into surface waters, or in a^--y alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissoi ed oxygen or turbidity? _X_ f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer -y cuts or excavations? X h. Substantial reduction in the amount of .rater otherwise available for public water supplies? X Discussion: The proposed zoning is not anticipated to result in a substantial increase in water usage or a significant reduction in the amount of water available to the city. i . Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? _ _ X Discussion: The proposed project site is not located in the vicinity of the flood plain or any other water related hazards. 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? X b. Reduction of the numbers of any mature, unique, rare or endangered species of plants? _ X Environmental Checklist —3— (0527d) Yes Maybe No c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? _ _ X d. Reduction in acreage of an agricultural crop? _ _ X Discussion (a-d) : The site is currently occupied by a pump storage/repair business and contains 1 mature tree which may have to be removed or relocated to develop site. However, the subsequent development will be subject to standard conditions of approval which require that mature trees be maintained if feasible or replaced at a 2:1 ratio. No significant impact is anticipated. 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? — _ X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? _ _ X C. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? _ _ X d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? _ _ _X. Discussion (a-d) : The site is occupied by a pump storage/repair business and does not appear to support any unique a7imal species . No significant impact is anticipated. 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? X Discussion: Short-te^^: The project does not consist of any development at this time. However, equipment associated with construction of subsequent development may generate short-term increases in noise during the site preparation and construction phases. However, construction noise impacts resulting from development under the proposed zoning are not anticipated to be substantially different than those resulting from construction under the R2 Zoning. Subsequent development will be subject to standard conditions of approval which limit the hours of construction activities and compliance with the Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance. Long-Term: The project site is located within a 65 CNEL noise contour. The proposed zone change will remove residential zoning from the 65 CNEL. However, proposed zone change will also allow for industrial development adjacent to multi-family residences. The introduction of industrial uses and associated activities (such as truck traffic) is anticipated to increase noise in the project area and may impact residences to the north and east. Noise impacts are anticipated to be project specific and will be addressed through the entitlement process. No significant impacts are anticipated. b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X Discussion: See 6a. 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X Discussion: The project does not consist of any development at this time; however subsequent development will result in new light and glare in the project vicinity. Subsequent development will be subject to Environmental Checklist -4- (0527d) Yes Maybe No entitlement and standard conditions of approval which require submittal of a lighting plan to insure that lighting will not spill onto adjacent properties. No significant impact is anticipated. 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? _ X Discussion: The proposed project is a change in zoning of the property. The existing zoning would allow for development of approximately 4 multi-family residential units. The project proposes amending the zoning on a 8,100 square foot strip of property from R2 (Medium Density Residential , 15 units/acre) to allow for industrial development on the site. Although the property is currently occupied by an industrial use, rezoning of the property is anticipated to result in development of more intense industrial uses adjacent to a residential area. The compatibility of the M1 zoning with adjacent uses will be determined by analysis contained in this study and during the zone change review process. 9. Natural Resources . Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? _ X Discussion (a-b) : No development is proposed at this time. Subsequent replacement of the existing building on the site with new industrial buildings may increase the demand of natural and energy resources. However, the increase usage is not anticipated to be substantial and any impact to the rate of usage or depletion of supplies is anticipated to be negligible. Project specific energy usage impacts will be addressed through the entitlement process. Impacts will be reduced further through implementation of the Energy Conservation Standards in Title 24 of the California Administrative Code as required through standard conditions of approval . 10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to oil , pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X Discussion: A portion of the site is currently occupied by a pump storage/repair business which will have to be removed in order to develop the site. Subsequent development of the site and removal of the business may require removal of waste fuel/oil tanks and contaminated soils which have the potential to release petroleum products through leakage or spillage. However, cleanup of the project site will be subject to standard conditions of approval which require any oil storage tanks to be removed and the site to be cleaned up in accordance with Fire Department standards. No significant impact is anticipated. b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? — _ X 11 . Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? X Discussion: The proposed zone change will eliminate development of future housing opportunities on the site. However, the site will provide approximately 4 units which is not considered substantial . The proposed project may provide additional employment opportunities in the city. However, the number of jobs created is not anticipated to be substantial . The potential impacts to the city's growth rate and housing demand is considered negligible. 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? _ _ X Environmental Checklist -5- (0527d) �. Yes Maybe No 13• Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? X Discussion: The proposed project does not consist of any development at this time. Subsequent industrial development, based upon conceptual plans submitted by the applicant, is projected to generate approximately 22 trips with a peak hour trip generation of approximately 3 trips (calculations based upon ITE trip generation rates). The current zoning to anticipated to allow for development of approximately 4 units and will generate an estimated 24 ADT and 3 peak hour trips. The anticipated change in potential trip generations is negligible. Project specific traffic impacts resulting from subsequent development will be addressed through the entitlement process; no significant impacts are anticipated. b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new off—site parking? X Discussion: Subsequent development will be required to comply with Article 960: "Parking and Landscaping" of the City of Huntington Beach Ordinance Code which requires that all parking be accommodated on site. No significant impact is anticipated. C. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? — _ X _ Discussion: The proposed project does not consist of any development at this time. However, the zone change will allow for industrial development in the vicinity of multi—family residential units and has a potential for generating industrial truck traffic on adjacent residential streets . Project specific circulation impacts will be addressed through the entitlement process. No significant impact is anticipated. d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? _ X_ Discussion: See 13c. e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X _ Discussion: The proposed project does not consist of any development at this time. However, subsequent development will result in the presence of construction and industrial truck traffic and may result in increased obstacles to vehicles , bicyclists and pedestrians during the construction and operation of industrial uses. Construction related hazards are short—term and are not anticipated to be substantial Furthermore, subsequent development will be subject to standard conditions of approval requiring submittal of a construction vehicle routing plan. Industrial truck use on the site will be dependent on future uses on the site. Project specific traffic impacts will be addressed through the entitlement process. 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? X b. Police protection? X C. Schools? X d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X Environmental Checklist —6— (0527d) Yes Mayes NQ e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X Discussion: The project site is currently unimproved and will require installation of sidewalk, curb and gutter which will be maintained by the City. However, these improvements are not considered substantial and will not require any additional manpower or facilities to serve the proposed project. f. Other governmental services? _ X Discussions (a—d,f) : All public services are currently available for the site. Development under the proposed zoning will not result in a need for any additional fire, police, school , park, public facilities or services. No significant impact is anticipated. 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? — _ X Discussion: See 9 (a,b) . b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing source of energy, or require the development of sources of energy? X Discussion: See 9 (a,b) . 16. Utilities . Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities : a. Power or natural gas? X b. Communication systems? X C. Water? X d. Sewer or septic tanks? X e. Storm water drainage? X f. Solid waste and disposal? X Discussion (a—f) : All utilities are currently available in the project vicinity. Subsequent development of industrial uses may require installation of connections into existing utility systems; however, the subsequent development is not anticipated to result in a need for any new systems or substantial alterations to existing systems to serve the site. 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? _ X b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? X 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X Environmental Checklist —7— (0527d) Yes Maybe No Discussion: The site does not currently offer any view opportunities and is not anticipated to result in an aesthetically offensive site; no significant impact is anticipated. 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? _ X Discussion: The proposed project site will not impact any recreational opportunities. 20. Cultural Resources. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? _ _ X b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? C. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? Discussion (a-d) : The proposed project site is not located in the vicinity of any known archaeological sites. 21 . Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, sub- stantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or- prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future. ) X C. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively consid- erable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small , but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) X d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X Environmental Checklist -8- (0527d) DETERMINATION r On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there _ will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL _ IMPACT REPORT is required. 6 Date Sign re Revised: March, 1990 For: City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department Environmental Checklist —9— (0527d) 0 1600 3100 0 DOISA x ARGOSY =r_, < = o� u EADUENZ � � 3 a Z FDINGFv 1 � IIE II WAVNEv WARNER I � IAI D(vi [illy e a 3 GAv1iF:C - Sys ti � of a 0 Uo T Ham, i� .(IAMB t F O / H•u ll IOII I VICINITY MAP 1 R1 HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION a] 11�3.1 1�-�13 I� j! + � :I •)r)r)[ P � - ���) - _�� r�~I �l' 'I_ ;;'.,i i,i i }!I ' iJjli�•iF .) II:Ii��rI I��i ) Q I• ,. I. � 1I� - .,'.I�-.;f []][ �. I. •+ :{;� '�� '�, t: •;�- �r I I�l.� �-�+II; I 1� I�i t]t' _ ,I_I:.I`"I,' �I :-�L,�}�I-r(�.�L�.ii��l• i j I� _.-.'1'. r - til� �� I I I 1(' , f'[j[ ��'t ':71 `TijE�•-�'t'I`-:� - '' " -i- I i t i I,I;,II :`.. T;, L,r j.,:. �J. l- I .-i i- i- [ -}}i�'y t:j'tl EE:i {,x I - - •Jl j-L- - { -t.j-I' I. j• .I-:I. ,- � 1] �Ci% :' Ii'•�9 S� i!!,. - _ _ - I' I •- � -i t�r•,:.� - t�._j,I I ,� o �� � _---,__.L.LLl�7�� ILS--- 31-I-:- ,.:t.. illf.-. I•�i i - ! i.i,. �i� �'(: - I ° i. 'I ji(I` 'i�4 ,,f�*:� •� n 'i! .I- - - "• _ �rFi i.i:-I I` _- i'l�I [:i'� ,ll��(I:,�;? �-j - �I' :I 1 r i _.. ��•� :3� -I. i i. IICC`` -T---�-_ __L-ra--� _ {�.:---r,-T-. -E°. I 1=t-11.:1_L�_-_.LLL. ..._ o_ .L;_1�:I..��L- 1-i.i=--:�.I (!.-_--• II- ® ii;l J rl � I�IIII-l3ill [ oil R. R. K G [ I I yr - J:f.� jrlli y'.11:ilI F� 3 i:. . •� v� 3 H. H. I {1 ° 0 -_- ..�..._._ _._�--__—.q_} _ -� _____ ___ _ • F�r� Imo- .L�S p t1t�O❑ Y` p A. W.IOLFSAL, ✓_ REPal0. FA<. I.Y J'o n: +j1G3O�)-(`i,ISW�I 0 �•.•,�r� ,.. �1 Q 4 Q L7�1•V'Ud Z Penrneu[A. PuF. Ceta v.^a I..., c...., ..•,�.... ..(..',.... .� !„..,• ti Mun T.n6 a r.<-. ci.. . L�'I WJF.i�.'� .. .a. ... I .." _,! i ••O1 ,5 i\ I .•7_ ---i-_ ._ ---.�.�---.—.—i_ � _..-._..,_-.GI ."i 1 - �.__ __ - JI��I .. -_ .. \ I I I r mv.�-�1'1-- a 1 . 1 I • I-j I j i _ I I- l e� I� p I �` I iiv�x Ii i•P I I I II �° .c I i • 1 ..__ U. --- . . I I..,i.aa.a i• II T771.1 >A P 1 n I ' /I i 1 y11. -- ! 1'�♦ 1' ��� ! � -y I •� I !I b: • I vl n o -° � I I I . II .. v ' �,� 'p- - I I • -i �o o a� ;I S A >' I I ! S t v .r ., ,.+,0 3 i ,.O'. � > _ :I�.r I I •.�-. 1 !. i �I Imo- y! �- _ - -.-.. __C�9 Y•.-,-. __ _ .. 1- ql "t , %. �I I I i I i I � � �• > I i I i i i t i i ! gy p•r 5 �.I , . ,• rj � i I I � 1 i -or, -. tr_ e'. 71 .'..a MINUTES _ HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY OCTOBER 22.1991 Council Chambers - Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California STUDY SESSION - 5:30 PM REGULAR MEETING - 7: 00 PM PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE A (Excused) P P P P ROLL CALL: Richardson, Newman, Shomaker, Kirkland, Dettloff P P Bourguignon, Leipzig A. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (4 MINUTES PER PERSON, NO DONATING OF TIME TO OTHERS) Anyone wishing to speak must fill out and submit a form to speak prior to Oral Communication or Public Hearing items . No action can be taken by the Planning Commission on this date, unless agendized. B. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS B-5 ZONE CHANGE NO. 91-4/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-26: APPLICANT: Olaf Smildzins (Peninsula Pump) LOCATION: 7511 Warner Avenue Zone Change No. 91-4 in conjunction with Negative Declaration No. 91-26 is a request to change the zoning on a parcel of property from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) , so as to permit the property owner to construct an industrial building on the site. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Negative Declaration No. 91-26 and deny Zone Change No. 91-4 with findings and forward the application to the City Council for final determination. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Mark Rogers, representing applicant, stated the purpose of the application is to improve the property. He said it would be inconsistent to put a residential use on a street that busy. He also stated that he disagreed with the findings for denial . THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. The Commission questioned the current use, what improvements could be made without the zone change. They also asked if the zone change could be limited to stay only with the current business . Cousel explained that you could not condition a zone change to run only with the business . A MOTION WAS MADE BY KIRKLAND, SECOND BY BOURGUIGNON, TO APPROVE ZONE CHANGE NO. 91-4 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-26 WITH FINDINGS AND FORWARD TO CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL DETERMINATION, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Newman, Shomaker, Kirkland, Dettloff, Bourguignon, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: Richardson ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - ZONE CHANGE NO, 91-4 : 1. Although proposed zone change from R2- M1 does not conform with the Land Use Element of the General Plan, the site is less than an acre and is exempt from the zoning/general plan consistancy requirement . 2 . The proposed zone change from R2 to M1 is consistent with the existing use of the property and is compatible with adjacent land uses . PC Minutes - 10/22/91 -2- (1490d) J.L. Webb Planning, Inc. A0 2900 Bristol Street, Suite F102, Costa Mesa CA 92626 (714)-55-7-3707- Land Planning • Landscape Architecture Urban Design 83a-�a a5 July 26, 1991 City of Huntington Beach Department of Community Development 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 This zone change request is for the 0.� -acre parcel owned by Peninsula Pump and Equipment Inc. We are requesting that the zoning be changed from R-2 (medium density residential) to M-1 (general industrial). The property is located on Warner Avenue in the City of Huntington Beach. The area borders a large M-1 district and an R-2 area. Specifically,the property is bounded on the west by the Pacific Electric railroad tracks, and adjacent to the tracks on the west is an area of general industrial development. Directly to the north and to the east of the subject property is medium density residential development. To the south of the property is general industrial development. There currently exists a small structure on one lot of the parcel. This structure is not in conformance with the City's zoning because the widening of Warner Avenue resulted in its location on a right-of-way line. The owner proposes to construct a concrete block building on the other lot of this parcel. The existing structure will be demolished and replaced by a parking lot landscaped in conformance with the design guidelines for M-1 uses. The purpose of both the existing and the proposed building is the warehouse storage of pumps for&-livery and installation. t'nank you for your attention to this application. Sindrely, 1\1:chael J. Bernhardt Project Manager 0 CLD:kjh 9102-8 �'1 PiY1� STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Orange I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or (amended publication) interested in the below entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the HUNTINGTON BEACH INDEPENDENT, a newspaper of general dreu!a.fan, pdr:tsd and published in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of Califomia,and that attached Notice is atrue and PUBLIC NOTICE ,438]UESTi Rezone 7,438 square toot(net) par-� complete co as was printed and published in CORRECTED cel of real property from R2: p copy p pV ,(Medium"Density Residen= the Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley PUBLIC HEARINGCE OF facturing)1 (Limited Manu ZONE CHANGE ENVIRONMENTAL STA- issues of said newspaper to wit the isme(s) of: NO.91.41 TUS: Negative Declaration NEGATIVE No. 91-26 has been jlre- DECLARATION pared and advertised for a! December 26, 1991 No.9�•2a :riod hlch expired onublic nSee i (Rezone property tember 24, 1991.This Neg-: January 2, 1992 (amended) i from R2 ative Declaration wiU also (Medium Density be considered by Council. Residential) COASTAL STATUS: Not: to M1 (Limited applicable Manufacturing) ON FILE: A copy of the' NOTICE IS HEREBY proposed request-is on file GIVEN that the Huntington;in the Community Develop- Beach City Council will ment Department, 2000 hold a public hearing in the Main Street, Huntington Council Chamber at the Beach, California 92648,E Huntington Beach Civic for Inspection by the pub Center, 2000 Main Street, lic. A copy of the staff re-; Huntington Beach, Califor- Port will be available to in- nia, on the date and at the terested parties at City Hall i time indicated below to re- 01 the Main City Library ceive and consider the--_(7111 Talbert Avenue)after statements of all person January 3,1992. who wish to be heard rela- ALL INTERESTED PER- tive to the application de- SONS are invited to attend scribed below. said hearing and express DATEMME: Monday,Jan-,opinions or submit evi- uary 6,1992,7:00 PM dence for or against the APPLICATION NUMBER: application as outlined Zone Change No. 91-4/ above. If there are any fur- Negative Declaration No. ther questions please call declare, under penalty of perjury, that the 9APPLICANT: Olaf,Thomas Reaers. Assistant pn Oln IS true and Correct. Smildzins (Peninsula) PUBLIC NOTICES foregoing g Pump) Planner at 536-5271. LOCATION: 7511 Warner Connie Brockway, ' Avenue rk Executed on January 2. 199 L- ZONE: R2 (Medium Den- City blushed Huntington r .sity Residential) _� Beach/Fountain Valley in- at Costa Mesa, Cialifomla• dependent December 26, 1991 Amended Publication Jan. • uary 2,1992 011-001 Signature J PROOF OF PUBLICATION `NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING /9 ZONE CHANGE NO. 91-4/ NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-26 (Rezone property from R2 [Medium Density Residential] to M1 [Limited Manufacturing] ) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, January 6, 1992, 7: 00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No . 91-4/Negative Declaration No . 91-26 APPLICANT: Olaf Smildzins (Peninsula Pump) LOCATION: 7511 Warner Avenue ZONE: R2 (Medium Density Residential) REOUEST: Rezone a 7,438 square foot (net) parcel of real property from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) . ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No . 91-26 has been prepared and advertised for a 21 day public comment period which expired on September 24 , 1991. This Negative Declaration will also be considered by Council . COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library (7111 Talbert Avenue) after January 3, 1992 . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If there are any further questions please call Thomas Rogers, Assistant Planner at 536-5271 . Connie Brockway City Clerk (1003d-3) �o NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CHANGE NO. 91-4/ NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-26 (Rezone property from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 [Limited Manufacturing) ) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, January 6, 1992, 7: 00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No . 91-4/Negative Declaration No. 91-26 APPLICANT: Olaf Smildzins (Peninsula Pump) LOCATION: 7511 Warner Avenue ZONE: R2 (Medium Density Residential) REOUEST: Rezone a 7,438 square foot (net) parcel of real property from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) . ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No . 91-26 has been prepared and advertised for a 21 day public comment period which expired on September 24 , 1991 . This Negative Declaration will also be considered by Council . COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library (7111 Talbert Avenue) after January 3 , 1992 . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing. and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If there are any further questions please call Thomas Rogers, Assistant Planner at 536-5271 . Connie Brockway City Clerk (1003d-3) A flJ CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH re INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To Connie Brockway From Thom Rogers City Clerk Assistant Planner Subject MAILING LABELS FOR Date December 18, 1991 ZONE CHANGE NO. 91-4 The attached mailing labels submitted by the applicant were not "certified" by a Title Insurance Company. Therefore, staff has checked the labels against the latest roles availabale in our office. As you can see, a few labels needed to be revised. I hope this satisfies your requirements for public notice. TR: lp (1280d) PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST • kAILING LABELS ` t (1010D) 8/20/90 \1 H.B. Chamber of Commerce Huntington Beach Co. City f Westminster 2213 Main St. #32 2110 Main St. 8 0 tm' ster Blv . Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Hunt. Bch. , CA 92648-2499 st t r, C 2 3 Attn: Kim Barone Attn: William D. Holman t n i r. H.B./F.V. Board of Realtors WicR Society Ci y f Seal each 8101 Slater Ave. Mu u 1 S Huntington Beach, CA 92647 1 h, CAD Attn: Board President 64 t P ni Am os De is Chica ces Bd. CPtalommission15 45 mp a . La a Comm er ices Dept. he H t'n to Be ch CA 264 0 i S 4 380 it P e i n t o a , C 2 8 o g i r on F fiend of the HB Wetlands *Co ng It a s fist i4tl2 2 902 io L ,e e. 01 Pu an StH ,rti t B ch, A 9 64 C 64 S n n A 9A 't C rle r A ob Jo Co 1 onservancy MGolenWad. Leag. IYA ` 'Pro 664 4 ��14r►'1 �'�php K,,%7{ i LL n e CA 066 Lop% G10.r1 LA� to• R t al n er 7s3`IJ�✓4JM�� S Huntington Beach Tomorrow County of Orange/ERA 411 6th St. Michael Ruane, Di r. Olyw+pfc.s Awe, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 P.O. Box 048 UkArp Assef M�f1T•16mvp Attn: President Santa Ana, CA 92702-4048 !Cs Q 2- � �� V C A - 2b q B —OC County of Orange/ERA 200 4th St. #224 Thomas Mathews, Dir, Planning Santa A CA 92705 P. 0.\oxa 4048 Attn: Juli Vandermost Santa , CA 92702-4048 SCAG County of Orange/ERA 818 We 7th, 12th Floor Bob Fisher, Dir. Los Ange s, CA 90017 P.O. ox 4048 Attn: Rich d Spicer Santa a, CA 92702-4048 E.T.I. Corrall 100 C ty C s t a Mary Bell P x 200 20292 Eastwood Cir. C s le C 92 28-1 0 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 tn. ni g Di . Chairman, Environmental Board Ci of o n V ey Comm. Dev. Dept. 1 1 t v 2000 Main St. F n a V 1 2 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 A n la i D 1 111-022-06 111-022-07 JAMES ANDREWS RUSH JR ROY/LYNETTE CUNNINGHAM 6851 JARDINES DR 922 HYDE CT HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 COSTA MESA CA 92626 111-022-11 111-023-10 G P BUILDING ENTERPRISES INC RICHARD GUNN 17032 PALMDALE ST #C PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 ONE MARKET PLAZA SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105 111-360-03 111-360-13 WARNER AVENUE AUTO CENTER JOERG& ELENORE HEPPRICH 18321 VENTURA BLVD #715 27252 WESTRIDGE LN TARZANA CA 91356 LAGUNA HILLS CA 92653 111-360-14 111-360-15 JOERG& ELENORE HEPPRICH WILLIAM F LONGLEY 27252 WESTRIDGE LN 7502 WARNER AVE LAGUNA HILLS CA 92653 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-211-03 142-211-04 ELTON L BERRY KELLEY LEHMAN C/O CENTURY 21 THE AGENCY CONSTRUCTION INC 2516 W LINCOLN AVE 2516 W LINCOLN AVE ANAHEIM CA 92801 ANAHEIM CA 92801 142-211-07 142-211-08 JOHN R CONTRERAS ELVA LOU WOOD 16912 S LYNDON ST 32951 RHINEHART ST HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 LAKE ELSINORE CA 92330 142-211-09 142-211-51 BRC ASSOCIATES E. HELMUT BRAUN JR C/O LEVERN F CARNAHAN 1304 RINCON DR 24062 BROADHORN DR LA HABRA HEIGHTS CA 90631 LAGUNA NIGUEL CA 92677 142-211-52 142-211-53 ELIZABETH BAILEY JESSE J GONZALES 7561 WASHINGTON 7551 WASHINGTON AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-211-54 142-211-59 PHILLIP J ROCCO JR etal LOUIS & GENEVA ORTIZ LEVERN F CARNAHAN JR 16922 LYNDON ST 24062 BROADHORN DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 LAGUNA NIGUEL CA 92677 142-212-01 142-212-02 FRED & BEVERLY SCHARF DOMONIC SCOLARO JR 3935 ELM AVE 7171 HEIL AVE LONG BEACH CA 90807 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-212-03 142-212-04 BARRY L MILLER BARRY L & KATHRYN W MILLER PO BOX 3372 700 LIDO PK DR #20 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92663 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92663 142-212-05 142-212-16 DALE WILLIAM NOORDMAN LARRY M MATSUI 7572 WASHINGTON 17401 BURCHIT CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 YORBA LINDA CA 92686 142-212-17 142-212-18 LARRY M MATSUI FRANK & REBA TEPLITZKY 17401 BURCHIT CIR 9738 EL DURANGO YORBA LINDA CA 92686 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 142-212-19 142-212-20 - {� FRANK & REBA TEPLITZKY TUO AN THI & KIM LONG PHA 9738 EL DURANGO 827 N AD A DR FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 FULLERTON 3 iR :� V qv 142-212-21 142-212-22 MARIO M DINOCO MORTON J THIEBAUD 8234 BIG BEAR CIR WINTERSBURG COMM WATER C/O J.SCOLARO BUENA PARK CA 90621 7532 WASHINGTON AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142- 1-02 142- 1-16 WARNE >ESAD ASSOC WARNE LYMPICS ASS 3191 A AIOP 3191 A AIR T LO DR COSTA M COSTA MESA 92626 142-221-03 MIKE BERNHARDT RICHARD GUNN J L WEBB PLANNING INC PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD 2900 BRISTOL ST STE F102 ONE MARKET PLAZA COSTA MESA CA 92626 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105 OLAF SMILDZENS CLARENCE VICTORY PENINSULA PUMP CORP PENINSULA PUMP CORP 7511 WARNER AVE 20 LITTLEFIELD AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94080 142-221-04 RICHARD GUNN PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD ONE MARKET PLAZA SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105 !V. ;, je CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CONNIE BROCKWAY CITY CLERK January 8, 1992 Olaf Smildzins Peninsula Pump 7511 Warner Avenue Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Dear Mr. Smildzins: The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its-regular meeting-held Monday, January 6, 1992 failed to approve your application relative to Zone Change No. 91-4. This is a final decision. You are hereby notified that pursuant to provisions of Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedures of the State of California you have ninety days from December 6, 1991, to apply to the courts for judicial review. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office at 536-5227. Sincerely yours, Connie Brockway, CMC City Clerk CB:me CC: City Attorney City Administrator Community Development Director Mark Rogers, Vice President, L. Webb Planning, Inc. 1051 K (Telephone:714536-5227) lo § 1094.5 SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS' Part 3 Note 378 itmuded for ncn trial de not#,, i'rv.Kvn:l t. miue.l c-nno irsioncr hind oo juri.dielion 1'nlffornia Utt wployment lux- Appeals Itd, and did not deti-rmluo merits. Wemtern Air (1117(i) 127 Cal.Rptr. 5-111• 57 l'.A.3d 'ell. I,lnem We. v. Sobieski (1961) 13 Cnl.ltptr. Trial court's judgment dcn.%ing writ of 710, till C.A.2d 309. mniuhtte to compel director of ngrioulturo lVact that letter dimcharging menior typ- to met amide him decision revoking petition- ist clerk in office of cotntl3 clerk bunted er's license as aircraft Allot in buxinesm ul thnt xhe wax guilty of misconduct in re- pest control wnx revermed unit enso re moving public records from tho files and ntnnded to Irial court. with directions to mutilating and mccreting them on various remand case to director for purpose of dutem, whereas in hearing before county 1 reconsidering the penulty previously hn- civil service cotutnixxion evidence nits in- posed, where it was found that some of troduced only no to what took place on tho charges ngainmt petitioner were not one of the dates, did not require the dis- mnpported by evidence. Wingfield v. urict court of appeal on n1.1wal from judg- Director of Agriculture (1972) 105 Cal. sent awarding senior tyl&i clerk writ of Rptr.019,29 C•.A.3d`loft. mandate, after reversing tho judgmeut of Proceeding for review of denial by coat_ the muperior court, to i•enunnd the matter missioner of mrponttionm of permit to to the commission for rt-onsideration, chnnge voting rightx of mharelutl erm where there was a similnrit'" of facts sur- would be remanded to mnperior court for rounding removal of the documents on nll of the dales. 1'rett v. Lux Angeles l;oun- detcrminafian whether there yens substu;ut- ty Civil Service Commibaiou (1952) 2:18 tial evidence to support emuniiseioner's I':Ld'3.1(>Y G.A:Ld lli. findings, where court improperly deter- 1094.6. Judicial review; decisions of local agencies; petition; filing; time; record; decision and jiarty defined; or- dinance or resolution (a) Judicial review of any decision of a local agc'rlcy, other than school district, as the term local agency is defined in Section 54951 of the Government Code, or of any commission, board, officer or agent th.. reof, may be had pursuant to Section 1094:5 of this code only if the petition for writ;of mandate pursuant to such section is filed 't:'ithin the time limits.specified in this section. (b) Any such petition shall be filed not later than the 90th day following the date on which the decision becomes final. If there is no provision for reconsideration of the decision in any applicable provi- sion of any statute, charter, or rule, for the purposes of this section, the decisi:, is final on the date it is made. If there is such provision for reconsideration, the decision is final for the purposes of this sec- tion upon the expiration of the period during which such reconsidera- tion can be sought; provided, that if reconsideration is sought pursu- ant to.any such provision the decision is final for the purposes of this section on the date that reconsideration is rejected. (c) The complete rvcord of the proveedings shall lx• prepared by It)(! local agelley or ils t•olllmist.ion, board, officer, or agent which made the decision and shall be tir"livercd to the petitioner within 90 tiays sifter he has filed a written request therefor. The local agency may recover from the petitioner its actual costs for transcribing or otherwise preparing the record. Such record shall include the tran- Script of thu proceedings, all pleadings, all notices and orders, any proposed decision by a hearing officer, the filial decision, all admitted 674 : Title 1 WRIT OF MANDATE § I Uy •6 exhibits, all rejected exhibits in the possession of the local agency or its commission, board, officer, or agent, all written evidence, and any other papers in the case. (d) If the petitioner files a request for Ihr record ns specified in sllluiivisitm (c) within 10 bays after the dine the decision becomes fi- nal as provided in subdivision (b), (lu' time within which a petition pursuant to Section 109-1.5 may he filed shall he extended to not later than the 30th day following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the petitioner or his attorney of rec- ord, if he has one. (e) As used in this section, decision means adjudicatory admin- istrative decision made, after hearing, suspending, demoting, or dis- missing an officer or employee, revoking or denying an application for a permit or a license, or denying an application for any retire- ment benefit or allowance. (f) In making a final decision as defined in subdivision (e), the local agency shall provide notice to the party that the time within which judicial review must be sought is governed by this section. As used in this subdivision, "party" means an officer or em- ployee who has been suspended, demoted or dismissed; a person whose permit or license has been revoked or whose application for a permit or license has been denied; or a person whose application for a retirement benefit or allowance has been denied. (g) This section shall be applicable in a local agency only if the governing board thereof adopts an ordinance or resolution making this section applicable. If such ordinance or resolution is adopted, the provisions of this section shall prevail over any conflicting provision in any otherwise applicable law relating to the subject matter. tAdded by Stats.1976, c.276,p. 681, § 1.) Forms lice West's California Code Forme, Civil Procedure. Library References AdntiniF•trative Law and Proeeduri� C.J.S. Public Adminir;trative Bodies and C-7Y2. Procedure § .193. Notes of Decisions In general 1 Llutt publie cmplo}•meat relatimm hoard Exhaustion of administrative remedies 2 had exclnAvu jurisdiction to determine whether the unfair pructice charges were Instified; and, in view of teachers' failure t" exlourst their administrative remedies I. In general under the Itoddn Ael. trial court erred in School hound's ''urilnivrtd freezing; of granting; writ of mandate to compel snper- teaehnr.s' snlnries after heg;inniog; of new iuteudent of district and others to ruise sulmol year, while v,minet uegotinomm wdari­; of vermin tenches. Amndor Val- were peuiling, urguuhl%. wtis rat unfair by Sernminry Vduentors Assn %. \ewlin prue.lice in violutiuu of the ltuddu Act so (1970) 151 Cu1.I1ptr. 724, M.4 C.A.3d 25.1. 675 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CHANGE NO. 92-2/ NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-26 (Rezone property from R2 [Medium Density Residential] to M1 [Limited Manufacturing] ) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, July 6, 1992, 7: 00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No. 92-2/Negative Declaration No. 91-26 APPLICANT: Olaf Smildzins (Peninsula Pump) LOCATION: 7511 Warner Avenue ZONE: R2 (Medium Density Residential) REQUEST: Rezone a 7,438 -square foot (net) parcel of real property from R2- (Medium. Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) . . ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No. 91-26 has been prepared and advertised for a 21 day public comment period which expired on September 24, 1991. This Negative Declaration will also be considered by Council. COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library (7111 Talbert Avenue) after July 1, 1992 . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application -as outlined above. If there are any further questions please call Robert Franklin, Associate Planner at 536-5271. Connie Brockway City Clerk (3541d) Connie Brockway,City Clerk `w , , w� City of Huntington Beach �� F9 .� ROSTA E,7� Office of the City Clerk = JU,+29 47 P.O. Box 190 t, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 _!\° CA I t� 142-221-02 WARNER OLYMPICS ASSOC TINGT �`a ® 6y� 2 GOTHARD ST #D �yH�UNTINGTON BEACH CA 26 X. �4°NTY ��' LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CHANGE NO. 92-2/ NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 91-26 (Rezone property from R2 [Medium Density Residential] to M1 [Limited Manufacturing] ) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, July 6, 1992, 7:00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No. 92-2/Negative Declaration No. 91-26 APPLICANT: Olaf Smildzins (Peninsula Pump) LOCATION: 7511 Warner Avenue ZONE: R2 (Medium Density Residential) REQUEST: Rezone a 7,438 square foot (net) parcel of real property from R2 (Medium Density Residential) to M1 (Limited Manufacturing) . ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No. 91-26 has been prepared and advertised for a 21 day public comment period which expired on September 24, 1991. This Negative Declaration will also be considered by Council . COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library (7111 Talbert Avenue) after July 1, 1992 . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If there are any further questions please call Robert Franklin, Associate Planner at 536-5271. Connie Brockway City Clerk (3541d) i Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach �� Office of the City Clerk 6 a .° � a . . P.O. Box 190 ? � . �' _ JUi�25 92 ,; i ASS Huntington Beach,CA 92648 CAI.1 142-221-16 —GZ, ` `' "E lT ADDRESS Warner Olympics Assoc. T���MPTED,-UNKNOWN �NTINGj� 16892 Gothard St. #B � Huntington Beach, CA 9264 o -NC9RPONArFO �F9 RETURN 7Q 3ENDER ATTEMPTED UNKNOWN u 2Vl• FFB I, 1909,0.� `tQ •t�./ .. '*-�. !'.,`���+Jt u1 (' BOUNTY ���` a; ':'•°`:,e>`.k;''� -----_.._._ LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING