Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Zone Change 94-4 - Negative Declaration 94-14 - Request to R
(REVISED) FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL ZONE CHANGE NO. 94-4 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - ZONE CHANGE NO. 94-4: 1. The proposed zone change of the 8.82 acre school site from Public Semipublic to Residential Low Density conforms with the Low Density Residential Land Use designation of the Land Use Element, and the policies contained in the Housing Elements by providing a variety of housing types. 2. The proposed zone change from Public Semipublic to Residential Low Density will create a zone consistent with surrounding zoning designations and single family residential land use. with the density undeF the Residential Low Density zoning elassifiention. 3. Zone Change No. 94-4 complies with Section 65852.9 of the Government Code by rezoning the Gill School site consistent with the surrounding land uses, following the decline by public entities to purchase or lease the property. 4. The proposed zone change is consistent with the notice and hearing provisions of Chapter 248 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. Council/Agency Meeting Held: 7-114,r Deferred/Continued to: Afflb ❑Approved Xiconditionally Approved ❑ Denied City Clerk's Signature -T Council Meeting Date: July 17, 1995 Department ID Number: CD 95-31 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNC L MEMBERS SUBMITTED BY: MICHAEL T. UBERUAGA, City Administrato PREPARED BY: MELANIE S. FALLON, Community Development Director SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE NO. 94-4 �� a Se 7-17 [statement of Issue,Funding Source,Recommended Action,Alternative Action,Analysis,Environmental St% s, ttachment(s �7111-71tte/Im/'ent of Issue: yec j°n a--.,,-C;zj rlell-I o✓p 74o>27 741("W V —/ CSu/li vQh ,vo> Transmitted for City Council consideration is a request by the Presley Companies to rezone the 8.82 net acre Gill School site located on the southeast corner of Cumberland Drive and Victoria Lane from PS (Public Semipublic) to RL (Residential Low Density). The school site is generally located north of McFadden Avenue and west of Goldenwest Street (see Attachment No. 3). If approved, the applicant will construct a 58 unit, single family planned unit development (PUD) on reduced sized lots, as approved under Tentative Tract Map No. 14990 and Conditional Use Permit No. 94-26 by the Planning Commission on June 13, 1995. Funding Source: Not applicable. Recommended Action: Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation: Motion to: A. "Approve Mitigateri NPaative Declaration No. 94-14"; and B. "Approve Zone Change No. 94-4 with findings for approval as outlined under Attachment No. 1, and Adopt Ordinance No. (Attachment No. 2)." \0-/ REQ 'ST FOR COUNCIL ACTION • MEETING DATE: July 17, 1995 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD 95-31 Planninq Commission Action on June 13, 1995: THE MOTION MADE BY KERINS, AND SECONDED BY LIVENGOOD, TO RECOMMEND THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 94-14 CARRIED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Holden, Livengood, Biddle, Gorman, Kerins, Tillotson, Speaker NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None THE MOTION MADE BY LIVENGOOD, AND SECONDED BY TILLOTSON, TO RECOMMEND THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE ZONE CHANGE NO. 94-4 WITH FINDINGS CARRIED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Holden, Livengood, Gorman, Tillotson, Speaker NOES: Biddle, Kerins ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Alternative Action(s): The City Council may make the following motion: A. "Approve Negative Declaration No. 94-14; and B. "Deny Zone Change No. 94-4 with findings." Analysis: Applicant: The Presley Companies, 19 Corporate Plaza, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Property Owner: Westminster School District, 14121 Cederwood Avenue, Westminster, CA 92683 Request: To rezone the existing 8.82 net acre Gill School site from PS (Public Semipublic) to RL (Residential Low Density). Project Proposal: The Presley Companies is requesting a zone change from PS (Public Semipublic) to RL (Residential Low Density) on the 8.82 net acre Gill Elementary School site to allow construction of a 58 unit, planned unit development (PUD). Tentative Tract Map No. 14990 and Conditional Use Permit No. 94-26 were conditionally approved by the Planning Commission on June 13, 1995 for the 58 lot, single family residential subdivision on reduced sized lots. CD95-31.130C -2- 07/06/95 8:34 AM REQ ST FOR COUNCIL ACTION• MEETING DATE: July 17, 1995 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD 95-31 As required by State Law (Section 39394 of the Education Code), the Westminster School District offered the City of Huntington Beach first right of refusal on the purchase of the school site in July of 1994. At their July 14, 1994 meeting, the City Council considered the notice of disposition and voted against the purchase of the school site, which has in turn allowed the District to pursue development of the site. Section 65852.9 of the Government Code states: "If all public entities enumerated in Section 39394 of the Education Code decline the school district's offer to sell or lease school property pursuant to Article 5 (commencing with Section 39390) of Chapter 3 of Part 23 of the Education Code, the city or county having zoning jurisdiction over the property shall, upon request of the school district, zone the school site as defined in Section 39392 of the Education Code, consistent with the provisions of the applicable general and specific plans and compatible with the uses of property surrounding the school site. The school site shall be given the same land use control treatment as if it were privately owned. In no event shall the city or county, prior to the school district's sale or lease of the school site, rezone the site to open-space, park or recreation, or similar designation unless the adjacent property is so zoned, or if so requested or agreed to by the school district." As a result of the City Council's action last July, and the existing Low Density Residential Land Use designation of the General Plan, the City is presumably obliged to approve the School District's request. SUBJECT PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS: Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential ZONE: PS (Public Semipublic) LAND USE: Closed Gill Elementary School North of Subject Property(across Cumberland Drive): GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential ZONE: RL (Residential Low Density) LAND USE: Single Family Residences East and South of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential ZONE: RL (Residential Low Density) LAND USE: Single Family Residences West of Subject Property(across Victoria Lane): GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential ZONE: RL (Residential Low Density) LAND USE: Single Family Residences CD95-31.130C -3- 07/06/95 8:34 AM REAST FOR COUNCIL ACTION • MEETING DATE: July 17, 1995 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD 95-31 Zoning Com liance If Zone Change No. 94-4 is approved, the proposed 58 unit, planned unit development will conform with the Low Density Residential development standards for a single family detached Planned Unit Development (PUD). General Plan Conformance: The proposed zone change from Public Semipublic to Residential Low Density is consistent with the existing Low Density Residential Land Use designation depicted in the Land Use Element of the General Plan. The proposed planned unit development will also be consistent with the goals and policies contained in the Housing Element in providing a variety of housing types. The General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC) has recommended as part of the General Plan Update that the land use designation on most of the school sites, including the subject school site (Gill), be redesignated to P(RL) (Public with a Residential Low underlying designation). However, the Committee further recommended that should City officials determine specific closed school sites as surplus, that any new development be consistent with the surrounding land uses and General Plan Land Use designations. The zone change will permit the development of single family residences which is consistent with GPAC's recommendation. Coastal Status: Not applicable. Redevelopment Status: Not applicable. Design Review Board: Not applicable. Subdivision Committee: Not applicable. Other Departments Concerns: The Departments of Public Works, Fire, Police and Community Services, and the Building Division reviewed the proposed subdivision (TTM 14990) and recommended conditions which were incorporated into the conditions of approval for the tract map and conditional use permit. The Planning Commission conditioned the subdivision, requiring the developer offer the City of Huntington Beach first right of refusal on purchasing Lot 23 for a potential water well site. The Department of Public Works, Water Division previously indicated that if determined to be necessary, the project site would be an ideal location for a City water well. CD95-31.DOC -4- 07/06/95 8:34 AM REQNST FOR COUNCIL ACTION • MEETING DATE: July 17, 1995 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD 95-31 Issues: Land Use Compatibility: The density of the proposed Planned Unit Development is 6.58 unit/net acre which is below the maximum 7.0 units/net acre allowed by code. The density of the existing tracts surrounding the proposed development is 5.5 to 6.0 units/net acre. The proposed street improvements will mirror existing improvements with landscaped parkways along Cumberland Drive and Victoria Lane. The architectural design, building setbacks, site layout and street system of the proposed development will assure the project's compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood. Specifically, the site will minimize impacts to drainage, building bulk, and privacy with minimal grading and grade differences between properties. The new perimeter walls will not exceed eight feet (maximum 2 foot retaining, 6 foot screen wall) as permitted by code. The one story element on the front of the majority of the homes will reduce building bulk along the streets and will be more compatible with the existing single story residences on Cumberland Drive and Victoria Lane. The proposed lots fronting Victoria and Cumberland, and adjacent to existing single family residences on Melbourne Drive and Yorkshire Lane (Attachment No. 3) will be larger in size and frontage than the interior lots. As a result, the new homes will be more compatible with the existing lots across Cumberland and Victoria. The new lots abutting the homes on Melbourne and Yorkshire will also be setback a minimum of 11 feet to 33 feet, further insuring privacy between homeowners. Closed/Surplus School Sites: City staff has been meeting with representatives of the various school districts on an ongoing basis to discuss general City policies involving the future use of closed and surplus school sites. The group has been exploring issues involving permanent loss of school facilities, open space, and recreational facilities, and the issue of land banking school sites. Once these issues are addressed, the City and school district's will not only have the information to consider other school sites as surplus, but will be able to determine the specific school site(s) within the district that are more feasible for development. Citywide data on student demographics, recreational amenities, and open space at the school sites, will assist the City in determining whether development of a specific school site is better than another. In this particular case, the Westminster School District notified the City of their intent to dispose of the site, offered the City first right of refusal to purchase the site, and has since hired a developer to process the necessary entitlements to develop the property. CD95-31.DOC -5- 07/06/95 8:34 AM REQ-ST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: July 17, 1995 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD 95-31 Public Park Improvements: Typically, with development of a Planned Unit Development, there are common open space areas. However, the new Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance does not require any open space areas for detached single family residence PUD's. For private open space, the site coverage requirement of maximum 50% assures that 50% of the lot area will be privately owned open area. For common open space the applicant is proposing to provide improvements to Greer Park which is in close proximity to the proposed PUD. The following list of improvements reflect upgrades to existing play equipment and expansion of park amenities, in order to increase the park's usability, comply with consumer product safety guidelines adopted by the State, and comply with the American Disabilities Act (ADA): 1. Install (16) light standards around the walkways, picnic benches and tot lots; 2. Remove and replace sand in the (2) tot lots; 3. Install rubberized surfacing in both tot lots; 4. Remove and replace play equipment in both tot lots; 5. Install a minimum of (8) benches around tot lots; and 6. Construct new basketball court adjacent to the existing basketball court. This list was generated by members of the adjacent Goldenwest Neighborhood Association and Community Services staff. The applicant will still be paying the Park and Recreation fees (Quimby Act) required by the City. Neighborhood Meeting: On May 9, 1995, the applicant held an informational community meeting at the Schroeder Elementary School to discuss the proposed project. Approximately 50 area residents of the Goldenwest Neighborhood Association were present to review the project. Residents were generally in support of the plan, however, raised concerns over the existing street and sidewalk conditions. Several residents expressed concern over the potential traffic impacts that were going to result from the proposed project. They were also concerned over the two story product, but were satisfied with the increased setbacks from the existing residences. Overall, the group was in favor of the applicant's request to improve Greer Park in lieu of providing a private recreational amenity restricted only to the new homeowners. CD95-31.DOC -6- 07/06/95 8:34 AM REAST FOR COUNCIL ACTION • MEETING DATE: July 17, 1995 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD 95-31 Summary: Staff recommends approval of the zone change from PS to RL, for a 58 unit single family residential PUD for the following reasons: The project is consistent with the objectives of the Low Density Residential and Planned Unit Development concept of the code in achieving a development that has an integrated design with the existing surrounding neighborhood. Public street sections, a one story element along the front of most of the homes, and reducing impacts caused by grade differentials between properties are methods used to provide a more compatible project. The proposed Greer Park improvements will benefit the entire community, rather than only the 58 new homeowners. The project's design, including the proposed grading, properly adapts to the surrounding terrain and land uses. The project complies with the Infill Lot development standards by requiring that grading occur only to the extent necessary to provide proper drainage. The potential environmental impacts have been identified and analyzed under Mitigated Negative Declaration No 94-14. The review indicates that with the implementation of the recommended mitigation measures and conditions of approval, the proposed project will not have an adverse impact on the environment. The proposed zone change of the 8.82 acre school site from Public Semipublic to Residential Low Density conforms with the Low Density Residential Land Use designation of the Land Use Element, and the policies contained in the Housing Elements by providing a variety of housing types. The proposed zone change from Public Semipublic to Residential Low Density is consistent with surrounding land uses. The proposed 58 lot subdivision is consistent with the density under the Residential Low Density zoning classification. Environmental Status: Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Community Development advertised Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 94-14 for twenty (20) days, and one written comment was received. The Planning Commission on June 13, 1995, recommended approval of Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 94-14. Prior to any action on Zone Change No. 94-4, it is necessary for the City Council to review and act on Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 94-14. The mitigated negative declaration identifies several mitigation measures including 1) replacement of all mature trees on a 2:1 ratio; 2) proper removal and disposal of asbestos materials found in the school facilities; and 3) review and approval of flammable materials stored on the construction site. These measures will reduce the potential adverse environmental impacts resulting from the project, and are incorporated into the conditions of approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 14990 and Conditional Use Permit No. 94-26. MTU:MSF:WC CD95-31.DOC -7- 07/06/95 8:34 AM REAST FOR COUNCIL ACTION • MEETING DATE: July 17, 1995 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD 95-31 Attachment(s): NumberCity Clerk's Page 1 Findings for Approval 2. Ordinance No. 3. Vicinity Map 4. Existing and Proposed Zoning Map 5. Applicant's Narrative dated June 6, 1995 . 6. Planning Commission Staff Report dated June 13, 1995 including Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 94-14 CD95-31.DOC -8- 07/06/95 8:34 AM ATTACHMENT 1 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL ZONE CHANGE NO. 94-4 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL-ZONE CHANGE NO. 94-4: 1. The proposed zone change of the 8.82 acre school site from Public Semipublic to Residential Low Density conforms with the Low Density Residential Land Use designation of the Land Use Element, and the policies contained in the Housing Elements by providing a variety of housing types. 2. The proposed zone change from Public Semipublic to Residential Low Density is consistent with surrounding land uses. The proposed 58 lot subdivision is consistent with the density under the Residential Low Density zoning classification. ATTACHMENT 2 ORDINANCE NO. 3 2 9 7 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING SECTION 9061 THEREOF TO PROVIDE CHANGE OF ZONING ON REAL PROPERTY FROM PS (PUBLIC-SEMIPUBLIC) TO RL (RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY) ON REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CUMBERLAND DRIVE AND VICTORIA LANE WHEREAS, pursuant to the State Planning and Zoning Law, the Huntington Beach Planning Commission and Huntington Beach City Council have held separate public hearings relative to Zone Change No. 94-4 wherein both bodies have carefully considered all information presented at said hearings, and after due consideration of the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission and all evidence presented to said City Council, the City Council finds that such zone change is proper, and consistent with the General Plan, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. The following described real property located on the southeast corner of Cumberland Avenue and Victoria Lane more particularly described as: Lot 75 of Tract 3890 in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California, as shown on a map recorded in Book 144, pages 16 and 17 of Miscellaneous Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said county. is hereby changed from PS (Public-Semipublic) to RL (Low Density Residential) (District Map 17). 1 4\s\G:Ord:ZC94-4\6/7/95 RLS 95-296 SECTION 2. Section 9061 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance code, District Map 17 (Sectional District Map 15-5-11) shall be amended to reflect the change contained in this ordinance and on the map attached hereto. The Director of Community Development is hereby directed to prepare and file an amended map. A copy of such district map, as amended, shall be available for inspection in the Office of the City Clerk. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after its passage. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 7TH day of AUGUST , 1995. Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk ity .ttorney ?-.A 4a �/7/tis REVIEWED AND 'ROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED: y Administrator Director of CommurAty Development 2 4\s\G:Ord:ZC94-4\6/7/95 RLS 95-296 . • Ord. No. 3297 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, CONNIE BROCKWAY, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing ordinance was read to said City Council at a re ug_lar meeting thereof held on the 17th of July, 1995, and was again read to said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 7th of August, 1995, and was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council. AYES: Councilmembers: Harman, Bauer, Leipzig, Dettloff, Green, Garofalo NOES: Councilmembers: None ABSENT: Councilmembers: Sullivan (out of room) I,Connie Brockway CITY CLERK of the City of Huntington Beach and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council, do hereby certify that a synopsis of this ordinance has been published in the Independent on ,19 In accordance with the City Charter of said City City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk Connie Brock%vU, City Clerk of the City Council of the City Deputy City Clerk of Huntington Beach, California G/kw/indexes/ordbkpg 8/9/95 ATTACHMENT 3 N � a e g ARGOSY 8 cy w MC FAD ENIx — CENTER — — — — EDTNGER WARNER \ \ SLATER 9 ♦ TALBERT \ ELLIS O •♦ — — — — — -OARFIEW SITE /YORKTOWN A ' ADAMS 1� INDIANAPOLIS b • ATLANTA 1 o HA?4ELTC I HAMILTON t / • BANNING a / CF-R H fvSm PANR) W J if / ZC94-4/TTM 14990/CUP 94-26 1 R� HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION ATTACHMENT 4::]l CAVTERBURY 0�+ CANTERSUPY DR RL . RL CUMBERLLND OR HDRESOEM z .zoW Q ZU Ps RL O EXISTING z ZONING OR (Gill School) N BRUNSwiCK OR 120< Mo T9C RL � DR C C 7 III 74�7�,(�� ' w 1L jLyy1C1, OS-PR RL _ R_I= o I (Greer Park) ECG: > z _ .so MC FADDEN AVE RL RL + RL I CAYTERBURY OR 04TERBUPY WL C/] U RL CUUSERLLNO DR CUMBERLL1C DR Z . ° i W RL Q i R T DRESDEN CA O c 1<L/ �RL PROPOSED Z (Gill School) gRUNSwiCK OR ZONING Y = RL - GR U J � W ix OS-PR RL 3 R = Q a c u i - (Greer Park) CG: •s o MC FADDEN AVE RL RL I RL IT AW' ZONE CHANGE# 94-4 HUNTINGTOIN AEAClf PLANNING DIVISION ATTACHMENT 5 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGION June 6, 1995 -Planning Commission City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 R.E: 'Tract 14990 The Gill School Site Honorable Commissioners: The Presley Companies formally requests approval of Tentative Tract 14990 whicll consists of 58 single family detached homes. - The design goal for our community was to integrate itself into the existing community while being sensitive to existing neighbors and to provide benefits to the overall community benefits. We accomplish our goals by the following: I. Comm unity Benefits Community Park Improvements-In addition to paying$3,120 per home or a project total of(5l 80,960) in park fees, we are proposing to improve the neighborhood park, (Greer Park) with new or additional facilities. These facilities include walkway lighting, benches,picnic tables,basketball court, new handicap accessible"tot lot" equipment with a rubberized surface, and new sand. IT. Project Compatibility A) Minimize grade differential -Maximum grade difference is less than T-0". This is accomplished by matching existing street grades. ❑ 19 Corporate Plaza a Nc-port Bcach, California 92660 ❑ 15090 Avenue or Science, Ste. 201 • San Diego, California 92129 (714)640-6400 • FAX (714)640-1643 (619)451-6300 • FAX (619) 487-7307 06-06-95 09 : 44AM PO4 06/06/95 08: 17 PP.ESLY CO. 374 1540 NO.774 D05 Planning Commission :tune 6, 1995 Page 2 B) Setbacks-Rear yard setback to existing homes is typically over 30'-0". (Minimum setback is I P-0" at an angle at the knuckle). C) Building Heights-Homes are proposed to be a maximum of 26'-0" which is less than the maximum allowed of 35'-0". D.) Architecture-The homes are proposed to be traditional early California style of architecture. Thank you for your consideration of this project. Sinc Tel , Sco mami Project Manager - SM/cy :P ATTACHMENT 6 :»::.> :>: . :::::.: ::>::;...:. :.:::::..m .... ..... :.:::... : .;.:. .. . .. ' P R TO: Planning Commission FROM: Howard Zelefsky, Planning Director , ;�,� BY: Wayne Carvalho, Assistant Planner` �,� DATE: June 13, 1995 SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE NO. 94-4/TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 14990/ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 94-26/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 94-14 LOCATION: 9800 Cumberland Drive (closed Gill School site) (southeast corner of Cumberland Drive and Victoria Lane) STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Zone Change No. 94-4 is a request by Presley Companies to rezone the 8.82 net acre Gill School site from a Public Semipublic zoning designation to Low Density Residential. Tentative Tract Map No. 14990 and Conditional Use Permit No. 94-26, represent a request to subdivide the site into 58 lots for the construction of a 58 unit planned unit development (PUD) on reduced size lots. Because the proposal does not include private streets or common areas, there is no requirement for a homeowner's association. Instead of installing an on-site recreational amenity which would be restricted to the new homeowners, the applicant proposes to provide park improvements ($110,000) to the nearby Greer Park which would be available to everyone. Staff recommends approval of the zone change, tentative tract map and conditional use permit for the 58 unit single family residential PUD with the requirement to provide up to $175,000 worth of park improvements for the following reasons: • The project is consistent with the objectives of the Low Density Residential and Planned Unit Development concept of the code in achieving a development that has an integrated design with the existing surrounding neighborhood. Public street sections, a one story element along the front of most of the homes, and reducing impacts caused by grade differentials between properties are methods used to provide a more compatible project. The proposed Greer Park improvements will benefit the entire community, rather than only the 58 new homeowners. The project's design, including the proposed grading, properly adapts to the surrounding terrain and land uses. The project complies with the Infill Lot development standards by requiring that grading occur only to the extent necessary to provide proper drainage. • The potential environmental impacts have been identified and analyzed under Mitigated Negative Declaration No 94-14. The review indicates that with the implementation of the recommended mitigation measures and conditions of approval, the proposed project will not have an adverse impact on the environment. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Motion to: 1. "Approve Negative Declaration No. 94-14"; 2. "Approve Zone Change No. 94-4 with findings and forward to the City Council for adoption;" and 3. "Approve Tentative Tract Map No. 14990 and Conditional Use Permit No. 94-26 with findings and conditions of approval." GENERAL INFORMATION: APPLICANT: Presley Companies, 19 Corporate Plaza, Newport Beach, CA 92660 PROPERTY OWNER: Westminster School District, 14121 Cederwood Avenue, Westminster, CA 92683 REQUEST: Zone Change: To rezone the existing 8.82 net acre Gill School site from PS (Public- Semipublic) to RL (Low Density Residential). Tentative Tract Map and Conditional Use Permit: To allow a 58 lot subdivision for a planned unit development consisting of 58 detached single family residential units with reduced lot sizes. East and South of Subiect Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential ZONE: RL (Residential Low Density) LAND USE: Single Family Residences West of Subiect Property (across Victoria Lane): GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential ZONE: RL (Residential Low Density) LAND USE: Single Family Residences PROJECT PROPOSAL: The requested entitlements for the proposed project include the following: 1. Zone Change No. 94-4 is a request to rezone the 8.8 net acre closed Gill School site from PS (Public Semipublic) to RL (Residential Low Density/up to 7 units per acre) for single family residential purposes. The site is surrounded on all sides by single family residences. Staff Report-6/13/95 2 (pcsrl43) 2. Tentative Tract Map No. 14990 represents a request to subdivide the school site into a 58 lot subdivision for a planned unit development (PUD) consisting of 58 single family residential units (small lot, single family residential design) pursuant to Section 251.02 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (HBZSO). The 58 lots average 5456 square feet in lot area, ranging from 4319 square feet to 7254 square feet in size, as permitted as part of a PUD pursuant to Section 210.06 of the HBZSO. As part of the PUD request, the applicant is proposing $110,000 worth of park improvements to nearby Greer Park, located on McFadden Avenue, approximately 160 feet south of the project site. 3. Conditional Use Permit No. 94-26 represents a request to construct a 58 unit planned unit development pursuant to Section 210.06 "RL Property Development Standards" and Section 210.12 "Planned Unit Development Supplemental Standards and Provisions" of the HBZSO. The project is designed with larger lots on the perimeter to blend better with the residential properties. Lots fronting onto Victoria Lane and Cumberland Drive are 56-58 feet wide, and average approximately 5900 square feet in size. The smaller lots within the interior portion of the tract (attachment no. 2) are approximately 5200 square feet in size. There are three (3) different house plans and options for various floor plans and front building elevations. Plan One consists of a 1958 square foot, four (4) bedroom home with a two (2) car garage. Plan Two consists of a 2163 to 2349 square foot 3 to 5 bedroom home, depending on the selected floor plan. Plan Three is a 2273 to 2677 square foot, five (5) bedroom home, including an optional bonus room over the garage. Plans Two and Three have three car garages with three open spaces on the driveway. Plan One has a third car garage door, but does not provide the minimum stall requirements. Note that Plan One only requires a two (2) car garage. Grade differences between the adjacent properties and the project site will not exceed two (2) feet. New block walls will be constructed along the perimeter of the tract, which may require the removal of existing walls and fences on the south and east property lines. Wood fences will be installed between the individual lots within the proposed tract. The school district has been negotiating with a developer to develop this site since July, 1994, and the applicant and previous developer have been working with the City to develop a plan that complies with the intent of the PUD standards based upon current and previous code. Staff Report-6/13/95 3 (pcsrl43) Zoninz Compliance The following is a zoning conformance matrix which compares the proposed project with the development standards of Chapter 210 Residential District Standards and Chapter 231 Off-Street Parking for a PUD for single family dwellings: . .. .......... . ... ...... r pose ec ion.....: ue� d....... 0 t ss .. .... VR quire ..... 210.06 Bldg. Site Requirements: Min. Area 6000 sq.ft. 4319-7254 sq.ft.* (avg. 5456 sq.ft.) Min. Width 60 ft. 50 ft.* 45 ft. for cul-de sac lots 25-50 ft. cul-de-sac* Min. Setbacks: Front 15 ft. min. 20 ft. Side 10%, min. 3 ft, max. 5 ft. 5 ft. M Street side 20%, min. 6 ft., max. 10 ft. 10 ft. Rear 10 ft. min. 11 ft. (U) Garage 20 ft. min. 20 ft. Building Height 35 ft. max.; two-story max. 29 ft.; two story Max. FAR N/A N/A Min. Lot Area/ 6222 sq. ft. 6624 sq. ft. Dwelling Unit (Density) (Max. 7 units/net acre- 67 units) (6.5 units/net acre- 58 units) Lot Coverage 50% max. 45% (1937 sq.ft.) (M) Floor Area Min. 1000 sq. ft. Min. 1958 sq.ft. (0) Open Space N/A N/A; however, park improvements to be provided to Greer park* 210.12 PUD Req.: (A) Tract Map Required Provided (B.1) Driveway Req'd for 50% of units attached Not Applicable parking side by side (B.2) Building bulk Units Attached side by side Not Applicable (B.3) Building bulk Upper Story Offsets Not Applicable (C-G) CC&R's Req'd for maintenance of Not Applicable common areas and communal facilities 231.04 Off-Street Parking 2 enclosed, 2 open 2 enclosed, 3 open (0-4 Bedroom) ' 3 enclosed, 3 open 3 enclosed, 3 open; In (5+Bedroom) addition, there will be 49 on- street parking spaces available. Part of PUD request Staff Report-6/13/95 4 (pcsrl43) The previous zoning code allowed a PUD with reduced lot sizes, and required a specific amount of common and private open space areas. The new ZSO allows for reduced lot sizes, but does not specify a requirement for open space areas for a detached single family residential PUD. The applicant is in compliance with the Property Development Standards except for the Minimum Building Site Requirements which is part of the PUD request. The subdivision has been reviewed under the City's residential infill lot development standards, pursuant to Section 230.22 of the HBZSO. The proposed tract has been designed to minimize impacts to existing adjacent residences by constructing homes which are compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. ISSUES: General Plan Conformance: The proposed zone change from Public Semipublic to Residential Low Density is consistent with the existing Low Density Residential Land Use designation of the Land Use Element of the General Plan. The project will be consistent with the goals and policies contained in the Housing Element in providing a variety of housing types. The General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC) has recommended as part of the General Plan Update that the land use designation on most of the school sites, including the subject school site (Gill), be redesignated to P(RL) (Public with a Residential Low Underlying designation). However, the Committee further recommended that should City officials determine specific closed school sites as surplus, that any new development be consistent with the surrounding land uses and General Plan Land Use designations. The zone change will permit the development of single family residences which is consistent with GPAC's recommendation. Environmental Status: Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Community Development advertised Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 94-14 for twenty (20) days, and one comment was received and a response has been included. The staff, in its initial study of the project, has recommended that a mitigated negative declaration be issued. Prior to any action on Zone Change No. 94-4, Tentative Tract Map No. 14990, and Conditional Use Permit No. 94-26, it is necessary for the Planning Commission to review and act on Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 94-14. Coastal Status: Not applicable. Redevelopment Status: Not applicable. Design Review Board: Not applicable. Staff Report-6/13/95 5 (pcsr143) i • Subdivision Committee: On April 26, 1995, the Subdivision Committee reviewed Tentative Tract No 14990. After a staff presentation on the proposed project, and discussion on the suggested conditions of approval, the Subdivision Committee recommended approval of the tract map with the condition that the developer provide the additional park improvements to Greer Park as recommended by staff. Other Departments Concerns: The Departments of Public Works, Fire, Police and Community Services, and Building Division have all reviewed the proposed subdivision and have recommended conditions which are incorporated into the conditions of approval. The Department of Public Works, Water Division has recommended that the developer offer the City of Huntington Beach first right of refusal on purchasing Lot 23 for a potential water well site. The Water Division has indicated that if determined to be necessary, the project site would be an ideal location for a City water well. ANALYSIS: Planned Unit Development: The previous zoning code allowed a low density residential PUD with reduced lot sizes and required a specific amount of private and common open space. The current ZSO also allows for reduced lot sizes but does not specify a minimum requirement for open space. This allows for greater flexibility in design and more creative solutions to developing PUD's. This is the first such PUD to be processed pursuant to the current ZSO. The primary issues associated with the proposed PUD are land use compatibility with existing surrounding residential uses and proposed park improvements. Land Use Compatibility: The proposed density (6.58 unit/net ac) is below the maximum (7.0 units/net ac)allowed by code. The density of the existing surrounding RL development is 5.5 to 6.0 units/net acre. The proposed street sections will mirror the existing street improvements across existing streets with landscaped parkways along Cumberland Drive and Victoria Lane. The smaller lots will be located within the interior of the tract. The proposed planned unit development will allow the developer to construct approximately six (6) additional units than if the site were developed to RL requirements (minimum 6,000 square feet lots). To obtain approval of a planned unit development, the applicant proposes to provide park improvements to Greer Park. The proposed park improvements are described in the next subsection. Staff Report-6/13/95 6 (pcsrl43) The architectural design, building setbacks, site layout and street system of the proposed development will assure the project's compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood. Specifically, the site will minimize impacts to drainage, building bulk, and privacy with minimal grading and grade differences between properties. The new perimeter walls will not exceed eight feet (max. 2 foot retaining, 6 foot screen wall) as permitted by code. The one story element on the front of the majority of the homes will reduce building bulk along the streets and will be more compatible with the existing single story residences on Cumberland Drive and Victoria Lane. The proposed lots fronting Victoria and Cumberland, and adjacent to existing single family residences on Melbourne Drive and Yorkshire Lane (attachment no. 2) will be larger in size and frontage than the interior lots. As a result, the homes will more closely mirror the existing lots across Cumberland and Victoria. The new lots abutting the homes on Melbourne and Yorkshire will also be setback a minimum of 11 feet to 33 feet, further insuring privacy between homeowners. Public Park Improvements: Typically, with development of a PUD, there are common open space areas. However, the new ZSO does not require any open space areas for detached single family residence PUD's. For private open space, the site coverage requirement of maximum 50% assures that 50% of the lot area (minimum 2160 sq.ft.) will be privately owned open area. For common open space the applicant is proposing to provide improvements to Greer Park which is in close proximity to the proposed PUD. Staff supports the concept of off-site improvements because they will be available to the entire neighborhood rather than to the homeowners of the proposed PUD only. This results in a greater benefit to the public. However, the amount of improvements necessary to the park will cost up to $175,000. (Attachment No. 8) which is higher than what the applicant is proposing. The following list of improvements reflect upgrades to existing play equipment and expansion of park amenities to increase the parks useability, comply with consumer product safety guidelines adopted by the State, and to comply with the American Disabilities Act: 1. Install (16) light standards around the walkways, picnic benches and tot lots; 2. Remove and replace sand in the (2)tot lots; 3. Install rubberized surfacing in both tot lots; 4. Remove and replace play equipment in both tot lots; 5. Install a minimum of(8) benches around tot lots; and 6. Construct new basketball court adjacent to the existing basketball court. This list was generated by members of the adjacent Goldenwest Neighborhood Association and Community Services staff. The applicant will still be paying the Park and Recreation fee s (Quimby Act) required by the City. Staff Report-6/13/95 7 (pcsr143) School Fees The Huntington Beach Union High School District submitted a letter dated April 21, 1995 (Attachment No. 4) indicating that the students generated from the proposed development would "impose a financial burden on the District due to the need for additional classroom and auxiliary space." Based on the district's recently submitted revised student generation rates of 0.2 students per unit, approximately 12 students would be generated from the 58 residential units. The District explains that the standard school fees collected from the developer is not sufficient for land acquisition and construction of new school facilities. The District notes that an additional $256,000 would be required in addition to the district's share of$93,000 for the 58 units. (The Huntington Beach Union High School District receives 39% of the total state mandated fee). The District is requesting that the City require the developer to enter into negotiations with the Districts to increase the fees for mitigation of the impact of the additional students generated from their project. Staff believes that the current state mandated fee of$1.72 per square unit is sufficient to mitigate the costs/impacts associated with the additional students on the school district The intent of the state legislation was to offset some of the school district costs by assessing new developments. Increasing the fee as recommended by the school district would have a dramatic affect on the cost of housing in this community. It would also place the City in a position of becoming an arbitrator of fees between the state, school district and property owner. The City is currently meeting with all the school districts in the City to develop a policy relative to school fees. Neighborhood Meeting: On May 9, 1995, the applicant held an informative community meeting at the Schroeder Elementary School to discuss the proposed project. Approximately 50 area residents of the Goldenwest Neighborhood Association were present to review the project. Residents were generally in support of the plan, however, raised concerns over the existing street and sidewalk conditions. Several residents expressed concern over the potential traffic impacts that were going to result from the proposed project. They were also concerned over the two story product, but were satisfied with the increased setbacks from the existing residences. Overall, the group was in favor of the applicant's request to improve Greer Park in lieu of providing a private recreational amenity restricted only to the new homeowners. SUMMARY: Staff recommends approval of the zone change, tentative tract map and conditional use permit to for a 58 unit single family residential PUD with the requirement to provide up to $175,000 worth of park improvements for the following reasons: • The project is consistent with the objectives of the Low Density Residential and Planned Unit Development concept of the code in achieving a development that has an integrated design with the existing surrounding neighborhood. Public street sections, a one story element along the front of most of the homes, and reducing impacts caused by grade differentials between properties are methods used to provide a more compatible project. The proposed Greer Park improvements will benefit the entire community, rather than only the 58 new homeowners. Staff Report-6/13/95 8 (pcsr143) The project's design, including the proposed grading, properly adapts to the surrounding terrain and land uses. The project complies with the Infill Lot development standards by requiring that grading occur only to the extent necessary to provide proper drainage. • The project will not be detrimental to the general health, welfare and safety, nor detrimental or injurious to the value of property and improvements of the neighborhood or of the City in general. The project is compatible with existing land uses, and will be provided with the infrastructure necessary for the development. In addition, the proposed project will provide more than the minimum parking requirement on site, with an additional 48 on-street parking spaces available for guests. The potential environmental impacts have been identified and analyzed under Mitigated Negative Declaration No 94-14. The review indicates that with the implementation of the recommended mitigation measures and conditions of approval, the proposed project will not have an adverse impact on the environment. • The proposed project is consistent with the Low Density Residential Land Use designation and policies contained in the Housing Element by providing a variety of housing types. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Motion to: 1. "Approve Negative Declaration No. 94-14"; 2. "Deny Zone Change No. 94-4 with findings; and" 3. "Deny Tentative Tract Map No. 14990 and Conditional Use Permit No. 94-26 with Findings for Denial." ATTACHMENTS: 1. Findings and Conditions for Approval 2. Site Plan, Floor Plans and Elevations dated April 24, 1995 4. Letter received from H.B. Union High School District dated April 21, 1995 5. Letter received from the Goldenwest Neighborhood Association dated May 1, 1995 6. Negative Declaration No. 94-14 with Response to Comments 8. Park Improvement Cost List dated May 23, 1995 SH:WC:kjl Staff Rcport-6/13/95 9 (pcsr143) ATTACHMENT NO. 1 FINDINGS AND SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ZONE CHANGE NO. 94-4/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 94-26 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 14990 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL- ZONE CHANGE NO. 94-4: 1. The proposed zone change of the 8.82 acre school site from Public Semipublic to Residential Low Density conforms with the Low Density Residential Land Use designation of the Land Use Element, and the policies contained in the Housing Elements by providing a variety of housing types. 2. The proposed zone change from Public Semipublic to Residential Low Density is consistent with surrounding land uses. The proposed 58 lot subdivision is consistent with the density under the Residential Low Density zoning classification. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL- TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 14990: 1. The size, depth, frontage, street width, and other design features of the proposed subdivision for a 58 unit planned unit development are in compliance with the standard plans and specifications on file with the City as well as in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and the supplemental City Subdivision Ordinance. The proposed single family residential subdivision is designed to integrate with the existing neighborhood with public streets and sidewalks. 2. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time that the General Plan designation of Low Density Residential (7 units per gross acre), and Residential Low Density zoning were implemented. The density of the proposed subdivision is 6.5 units per net acre. 3. The site is relatively flat and physically suitable for the proposed density of six and one-half(6.5) units per acre. With the approval of a planned unit development for reduced lot sizes, the proposed 58 lot subdivision for 58 single family detached residences does not consist of any relief from development standards. 4. Tentative Tract Map No. 14990 for a 58 single family detached subdivision is consistent with the goals and policies of the Huntington Beach General Plan. The proposed tract map for a planned unit development provides for a better living environment through proper land planning techniques. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 94-26: 1. The establishment of a Planned Unit Development consisting of 58 single family residential units will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity nor detrimental to the value of property and improvements in the neighborhood. The proposed grading, site layout, and design of the 58 unit planned unit development properly adapts the proposed structures to streets, driveways, and other adjacent structures and uses in a harmonious manner. Attachment-6/13/95 (pcsr143-10) • • 2. The planned unit development for 58 single family detached residences conforms with the provisions contained in the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. 3. The proposed PUD will not adversely affect the General Plan. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the Low Density Residential Land Use designation of the General Plan and is compatible with the surrounding developments. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL-CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 94-26: 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated April 24, 1995 shall be the conceptually approved layout. 2. Prior to submittal for building permits, the following shall be completed: a. Submit three (3) copies of the site plan to the Planning Division for addressing purposes. Street names shall comply with City Specification No. 409 and be submitted to the Fire Department for review and approval. b. Provide a minimum three (3) foot sideyard from fireplace enclosure wall. (BLDG) c. Floor plans shall depict natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at the location of clothes dryers; natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units; and low-volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. (BLDG) d. If foil-type insulation is to be used, a fire retarding type shall be installed as approved by the Building Department and indicated on the floor plans. (BLDG) e. If outdoor lighting is included, high-pressure sodium vapor lamps or similar energy savings lamps shall be used. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties and shall be noted on the site plan and elevations. f. The site plan shall include (or reference page) all conditions of approval imposed on the project printed verbatim. Model numbers, lot numbers and street names shall be depicted on the site plan. g. All mature trees shall be identified as to type, size and location on a tree plan submitted to the Department of Community Development and Public Works. The development of the subdivision shall retain all existing mature trees to the greatest extent possible, with a concentration of trees along the perimeter of the project. However, should existing trees require removal as part of the development, they shall be replaced within the subdivision at a 2:1 ratio. If a 2:1 replacement of trees on-site is not feasible, the applicant may provide the balance of trees to adjoining properties through the establishment of a tree voucher program. The program will be run by the applicant, subject to the supervision and approval of the Department of Community Development. The program shall be reviewed by the City's Landscape and Planning Divisions prior to removal of any tree or issuance of a grading permit, whichever occurs first.* Attachment-6/13/95 (pcsr143-11) • h. Prior to demolition, the abandoned school buildings containing asbestos shall be identified, and removed in compliance with City, State and Federal standards. An asbestos abatement program shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer and Building Official. i. The applicant shall submit a plan depicting the proposed park improvements at Greer Park pursuant to the May 23, 1995 estimated cost of improvements prepared by Frank Radmacher Associates. The plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Community Services, and Department of Public Works Park Maintenance Division. 3. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant/owner shall complete the following: a. A grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and it must be approved (by issuance of a grading permit).(BLDG) b. Wall plans shall be submitted and approved by the Department of Community Development. Double walls shall be prohibited; prior to the construction of any new walls, a plan must be submitted identifying the removal of any existing walls next to the new wall, and shall include necessary homeowner's approval. c. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer. This analysis shall include on-site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations, retaining walls, streets, and utilities. (PW) d. A plan for silt control for all water runoff from the property during construction and initial operation of the project may be required if deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works. (PW) e. A Landscape Construction Set must be submitted to the Departments of Community Development and Public Works and must be approved. The Landscape Construction Set shall include a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State Licensed Landscape Architect and which includes all proposed/existing plan materials (location, type, size, quantity), an irrigation plan, a grading plan, an approved site plan, and a copy of the entitlement conditions of approval. The landscape plans shall be in conformance with Section 232 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. The set must be approved by both departments prior to issuance of building permits. Any existing mature trees that must be removed shall be replaced at a 2 to 1 ratio with minimum 36-inch box trees, which shall be incorporated into the project's landscape plan. "Drought tolerant" plants and turf shall be used for all landscaping. (PW, PLNG) f. The developer shall obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit for construction activities from the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Evidence that a permit has been obtained shall be submitted to the City Engineer. (PW) g. Final design elevations of grading shall not vary from elevations shown on the tentative map by more than one (1) foot. (PW) Attachment-6/13/95 (pcsrl43-12) 4. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/owner shall complete the following: a. The applicant shall submit a site plan depicting the Model homes/sales office, and parking lot locations to the Department of Community Development for review and approval. b. Final Tract Map No. 14990 shall be accepted by the City Council, recorded with the Orange County Recorder and a reproducible copy filed with the Department of Public Works. (PW) c. An interim parking and/or building materials storage plan shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development to assure adequate parking is available for employees, customers, contractors, etc., during the project's construction phase. d. Six (6) fire hydrants shall be required and installed prior to combustible construction. Shop drawings shall be submitted to the Public Works Department and approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. (FD) e. All fire hydrants and all-weather asphalt roadways must be in place. (FD) f. Installation or removal of underground flammable or combustible liquid storage tanks shall comply with Orange County Environmental Health and Huntington Beach Fire Department requirements. g. The project shall comply with all provisions of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code Title 17.04.085 and City Specification No. 429 for new construction within the methane gas overlay districts. h. The placement and storage of the diesel tank(s) or any flammable substance shall be reviewed and approved by the Huntington Beach Fire Department prior to construction. i. Zone Change No. 94-4 shall be approved by the City Council and in effect. 5. During construction, the following shall be adhered to: a. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems in all areas where vehicles travel to keep damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site; b. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day; c. Use low sulfur fuel (.05%) by weight) for construction equipment; d. Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days (first stage smog alerts); e. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts. 6. Prior to final building permit inspection approval for any single family residential unit, the following shall be completed: a. The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District and submit a copy to Community Development Department. Attachment-6/13/95 (pcsr143-13) • b. All improvements (including landscaping) to the property shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans and conditions of approval specified herein. c. All park improvements to Greer Park shall be completed or a bond posted to assure completion with one (1)year from the first final inspection. Final approval shall be obtained by the Department of Community Services. d. Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein shall be accomplished. e. A reproducible mylar copy of the recorded final map, along with a digital graphics file of the recorded map, shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works. (PW) f. All building spoils, such a unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. g. Final Tract Map No. 14990 shall be accepted by the City Council. It shall be recorded with the County Recorders Office and a copy submitted to the Planning Division prior to final inspection of first unit. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 14990: 1. The tentative tract map received and dated April 24, 1995 shall be the approved layout. 2. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED. BONDING MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROVISIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT: a. The developer shall submit a separate utility plan, showing water system improvements including service connections to each building, fire hydrant, valves, backflow devices and other appurtenances in accordance with applicable U.P.C., City Ordinances, Public Works Standards and Water Division design criteria. These plans shall be approved prior to any construction, by the Public Works Water Division and the City of Huntington Beach Fire Department. (PW) b. Each proposed building shall have a separate domestic water service per Water Division Standard Plans. (PW) c. The water system shall be designed per the City of Huntington Beach Water Division's design criteria, and shall be installed per City of Huntington Beach Water Division's Standard Plans and Specifications. The proposed water system shall be looped and hydraulic calculations shall be submitted supporting the proposed water system design. Any existing on-site water facilities shall be abandoned per Water Division Specifications. (PW) d. Fire hydrant locations shall be approved by the Fire Department. All fire hydrant laterals shall be located within vehicular travelways. (PW) Attachment-6/13/95 (pcsr143-14) e. The proposed water system shall be looped from Victoria Lane to Cumberland Drive. The minimum water main size shall be eight (8) inch. The developer shall submit hydraulic calculations supporting proposed water system design. (PW) f. The following shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach: 1. The water system and appurtenances. 2. The sewer system and appurtenances. 3 The storm drain system and appurtenances. 4. The 2.00 foot public utility easement. (PW) g. Damaged and deteriorated public improvements on Cumberland Drive and Victoria Lane adjacent to the tract boundary shall be reconstructed per Public Works requirements. (PW) h. The engineer or surveyor preparing the final map shall tie the boundary of the map into the Horizontal Control System established by the County Surveyor in a manner described in Sections 7-9-330 and 7-9-337 of the Orange County Subdivision Code and Orange County Subdivision Manual, Subarticle 18. (PW) i. The engineer or surveyor preparing the final map shall submit to the County Surveyor a digital- graphics file of said map in a manner described in Sections 7-9-330 and 7-9-337 of the Orange County Subdivision Code and Orange County Subdivision Manual, Subarticle 18. (PW) j. Street lights shall be installed per Public Works Specifications. (PW) k. The existing driveways on Cumberland Drive and Victoria Lane shall be removed and replaced with curb, gutter and sidewalk per Public Works standards. (PW) 1. Hydrology and hydraulic studies shall be submitted for Public Works review and approval. The developer shall design and construct the storm drain system to serve the site. (PW) m. A sewer study shall be submitted for Public Works approval. The developer shall design and construct the sewer system required to serve the development. (PW) n. The developer shall design (including all required field survey, potholeing and utility research) and prepare bid ready plans and specifications for a new storm drain system located in Halifax Dr. from Edwards Street to Victoria Lane to serve the proposed site. The City will work with the developer on the specific details of the proposed storm drain. The City will construct the storm drain as part of a cash contract when funds become available. (PW) Attachment-6/13/95 (pcsrl43-15) o. An Affordable Housing Agreement Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Department. The plan shall provide for minimum 10 percent of the housing units (equal mix of 6 units) approved to be affordable to families of low and moderate income level (average 100% of Orange County median). Said plan shall be executed prior to issuance of the first building permit for the tract. The affordable units shall be under construction, or available to the public, prior to final building permit approval (occupancy) of the first home. The plan shall include, but is not limited to: 1. Build affordable units at an alternative location which is under control of the applicant. All units shall be constructed prior to or concurrent with the primary project and final approval of the project shall be contingent upon completion and final approval, or evidence of the applicant's reasonable progress towards attainment or completion, of the affordable units. 2. Rehabilitate existing units and ensure long term affordability. 3. Preserve existing affordable units for the long term (30 years). 4. Other options which generate new opportunities for low and moderate affordable housing units for thirty (30) years. 5. In lieu fees may be paid only if an affordable housing ordinance is adopted and a resolution for in-lieu fees is adopted prior to recordation of the final tract map. p. The developer shall provide the City of Huntington Beach first right of refusal to purchase lot 23 for a potential water well site. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REOUIREMENTS: 1. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department, except as noted herin, and shall meet all applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards. 2. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid. (PW) 3. Traffic Impact Fees shall be paid at the time of final building inspection of the first unit. (PW) 4. The applicant/property owner shall be responsible for paying the Park and Recreation Fees in effect at the time the final map is accepted by City Council or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. 5. An encroachment permit shall be required for all work within public rights-of-way. (PW) 6. Construction shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited on Sundays and Federal holidays. Attachment-6/13/95 (pcsr143-16) 7. Tentative Tract Map No. 14990 and Conditional Use Permit No. 94-26 shall become null and void unless exercised within two (2) years of the date of final approval. An extension of time may be granted by the Planning Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Division a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. 8. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of$38 for the posting of the Notice of Determination at the County of Orange Clerk's Office. The check shall be made out to the County of Orange and submitted within two (2) days of the Planning Commission's action. 9. Tentative Tract Map No. 14990 and Conditional Use Permit No. 94-26 shall not become effective until Zone Change No. 94-4 has been approved by the City Council and in effect. Attachment-6/13/95 (pcsr143-17) NOTES • I 'I I I " ND G LA IT SCHOOL 317E i--- I 7.(A"AID EONNO RL WITH SCH=....IT I GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION R[SID(MIIPL. = A PROPOSED ZONING RL -�_ I � T �• 11MT♦I I I I i I ! I f.PROPOSED LAND 0" S1411 IAL l RESIDENTIAL I I I E WATER SERVICE PROVIDED BY;CITY OI HYMN..MAC. -- r.AA I I I liB `_—•�—_•-— --=�- I; I -•_--I 4—_-p —I —_—'—�—_7p ----�_�-I —=---•-=r 6-j——�—' -----_- / I r 1i! iiq.lT II`~,'—, • SYS'All O[0B 8, E OF MR CSSaE[N WF C PRPROVIDED Y SOUTHN CiONIAGAS ar ANY$ECONia BN; RVC[ ROvO[O!Y SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA[pfON CEA q TELEPHONESERVICE PROYaO eY GE.IRK TELEPHONE COWANv� \ EfRKiS[ ~ OF nS TELEVISION KING VOEOCAMf vMsr NDd. sTCTa a CHOOLpARSCIWSTMVSTFSC �. THIS IS AN PPI, TION FOR A MVELOPNfNI►(RYf j lI � O 9D 29 Jl 37 at. I ,,. O 141, I II I II Ir 9 I 'I I $E�G•TIO..aA 1. A....'.I.. II�1 yz IT a8 � I -- {! I I I I I I LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 15 OF TRACT 40 3920 IN THE CITY OF HUNt•IG N TR.t x•Z _ JS nP „• I I i ! COUNTY OF ORANGE.AS SHOWN ON A YAP PECORDEN it aL PAGES I•,II Of-SCELLAIEOUS NA/S w DEW OP O y0 TIE COUNTY RECOPO[A OF SAID COUNTY ,,, E9 •o t," _' y I I ram_^ STATEMENT OF OWNERSM D _ 1� fl 0 A ; I ' I I{' Y�56�T��[. -Nf RA.cSIVE. IID. rl•S NAP 1.4 OWNER F 'II WIDER NY S KNOWLEDGE IS ED Ab THAT TIE OWNER Of I L� RECOPD HAS NNDwLEDGE Of AND CONSENTS TO IN O 11 „•• ,t,• O --[r-- I 'lWO OF THIS NAP Q ..s.... - III ��I ss C� ••r .e f o I 1 I. I- r , 4 g I ..Y•R oil 7 O e O I ! •— r1�N.0 , I — it IJ .� .e ATu..v I• aR a U • t ,,.r • .• r ,/I O - P.I. SCALE r ,o' VICRrITY MAP E MAP '95 N 1`nRUdSMICR W O /142.1513 IF N' I GROSS AREA 8.5• aL.s SITI 11 I ( I(_ —_-- CONTOUR INTERVAL TOTAL LOTS 58 II t/O L/., L.• ! 1/. 0' LL 1/. ._ 1®. ,7.0 iT.l I ! I/ ' I II ! ! II 1 0 ---- � ' ! I PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY: II I I I I 21 O /9 191 17 le l 12 I I I I im F omm CMFMIEs .r:1a.,f•KNrtt.�. -- III I iIlII 11V// �� 19 Daraart {P I I I II II I • �m ws rIo[o"o'•Nrw ��IN�.a�w IIj� II I I I '" II I I II I I I I I I I TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 14990 -��{-- LOCAL STREETS '-�:"--- — _saT.aOusias �"��I�n•�ETn4�'-i— uQIYs _ -- --- �..! a..� NOTES ANA ANN • .f . l e+aT.AL LAND SR SCHOOL HO • u A I.GENERAL PLAN .t MriM SGICOI TLACIR.AT • • r • 1 ORHERy PLAN Oe SIGDDAtIp..GSOF.TIAA. ."■• . A PNOFOseo l.A0 7YQ! ..n.. rMr • AAr • S FA TER SE VC1 YX'SIDS!.CSTT F"fI W ' _ • u■ ■ •r.f[11 S[■vKC WORDED�..pTt y M/•r•ALEOr MACH 1 , *AT[.SISTER RI I I I I I u r SERER XR"Ce FRo.DED or air OF u.rooTO.BE ACH i •GAS Sc.TKE F.OTDeo or BOYTHE.L CALFODNAA GAS CQNFANT. •.• . +CLETRK NTICC OTDEO ST SOUTHERN CAL.ORRA EDL"R "■ o C .A.. X W ■ AEr IQ S[Star"MIQTCED BT'OEHE COW ART TEL[Hldr COAMT OF CALWO r u . NNRLApD v cALEQR■A Ip �Ve ■ u s n CAGE T[LEWSgw..O vOEQCAKE """"- -- •rrA IROCYID _ A, ■>• . p SCDOOI dSrRKt WE STwNSTER SCHOOL dGrNlCr �[gJR `. -' ■ u h THIS IS AN APPLICATOR FOR A OGTELOP•4RT FGR.r r N■ / J6 r u At u . ® m ® m u I E JI 32 .13 74 75 i •u.. iI 52 1 r A 38 5i SD 19 A LEGAL DESCRIPTION .7 I � (� ® !�, e At a - C0IAIII OF 0 ANCEI AS SHOW"04 A•R P RECORDEDOF M BOOR e L v i u I.. PAGES M A I+ OF rSCELLA•■OUs rAos M rK OFF�Ce OF ■ ao • iHE COYNir RECORDER OF SAO C"TI• ■ AAN 51 E9 40 .S : u r e ® ■ u STATEMENT OF OWNERSHIP i >r ^ • I *.EST CE.1.1 THAT 1-3 RAF•,AS AR[/..GO •t .® E! 6 • VO[R.T SUF[.wS.M AW IIIAr THE O.NG.OF '� SS 46 R � + -' .[CORO fl.NOMLGO OF AND CONXMIs IQ THE y` FR. a I Tr AL s 25 ® 12 ®Q O 7 0: •r". ` —�7 T.[T.RaOATE •�T R V) I 17 A ® ana. 2e s7 U I6 43 'r 6 23 SA ,r /5 44 I - 'e 9 �I e ® e A a 10 A» ST z e SCALE 1' •� VICNTY MAP DATE MAR- !1 W O un.uu — GROSS AREA 6.94 AC.' SITE I ® TOTAL LOTS 56 u CD © pZO m ® m m. m PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: OR!FRET OO1rr1i[7 �!L!Byfsprtt t21 19 16 x 17 16 15 14 13 12 W.. It mns.R FLALA ar rAal.n..� w irA�.w. D..■OIO•D►•L.s SITE PLAN TRACT NO. 14990 LOCAL STREETS •A•�77�1[[[TE --------------- , ;n n ; , q a.rwwa oerx anewµ oerx on ceuc.ewe � R Ki BR 4 NI oo O ❑BR IRE „BR o•aa..0 0 U�E 2oa.11 �I .. -I I P N! 0 FAMILY --------- ------------ I�n.�a oKw� BR 3 sIV N© 3 BR FAMILY 2 1/2 BA RETREAT O " , ❑ 0 y § v 8 PORCHQ El vra.�l.xca G R GE rBR TFFICE a.Io p A 3 BR FAMILY 2 1/2 BA OFFICE 1 4 BR FAMILY 2 1/2 BA 1961 SF GILL SCHOOL SITE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES PRESLEY COMPANIES IM I..M 1 •FUT CONCRETE TILE ROOFING ' •STILL ROOFING E CONCRETE Ell -PAINTED WOOD FASCIAS •PAINTED WOOD FASCIAS •STUCCO FINISH _— ---_ •STRICT-OFINLSH •STUCCO TRIM AT FRONT -STUCCO TRIM AT FRONT SECTIONALOARAGE DOORS •SECTIONAL GARAGE DOOICS DIVIDED LITE WINDOWS AT FRONT •DIVIDED LITE WINDOWS AT FRONT •CAST STONE VENEER 111011LIGIIIS — — - — - ' —� 1A 1B • t CONCRETE TILE ROOFING PAINTED WOOD FASCIAS -STUCCO FIN W I G -PAINTED WOOD TRIM AT FRONT 0 _ _� •SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORS 1p —••— -DIVIDED LITE WINDOWS AT FRONT N -- W m 1C • GILL SCHOOL SITE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES PRESLEY COMPANIES g ,� g� dd J.*.. R`IDs �.� 2 FED V M--.:'. ` .EE1. m m 0 0 Om mI IA RIGHT IA REAR ---------------------- m M . ... 0T1.73. F IA LEFT IA ROOF Rr'1 • GILL SCHOOL SITE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES PRESLEY COMPANIES ,. 3 e a .ca ra ------------ ---------------- `O O I 0 - - ---- R BR 2 00 [� �G roG Bid& T; IFT CE GREAT ROOM �aFl •.»• .o BR 4 NG LJ U ❑MR T 4 {r O gl : 3 BR GREAT ROOM 3BA BONUS RM 0 RORC iM Y A AGE [ 1 1 ---------------- D EN 01 O � y I I -- - O i 2A 4 BR FAMILY 3 BA BONUS 2349 SF 2 4 BR FAMILY 3BA 2163 SF 3 BR FAMILY 3BA GILL SCHOOL SITE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES PRESLEY COMPANIES � ! a i 4 1HIl r l l i t I'Illl ''i >01 FLAT CONCRETE TILE ROOFING rl I I I ^� I I I I I I f'j��i I -STILE CONCRETE ROOFINO PAINTED HOOD FASCIAS /'��IS �.__.—_._...-..�'. .MINTEDNOODFASCIAS M _i _ •STUCCO FINISII I _ •STUCCO FINISH I ' — 8 •STUCCO TRIM AT FRONT I I.- I ( .STUCCO TRIM AT FRONT •SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORS I I.• I.II�+i -SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORS DIVIDED LITE WIND(TK AT FRONT iy�q I I I I I I I f �I�• ,l�( W I r� .DIVIDED LITE WINDOWS AT FRONT 11L -MASONRY VENEER IIK;I11.IG11TS IJ - UI _� -�+�� r- I C�C _�, I _J ' J _ICJ JL_.'•L.J J J J J 2A 2B • ��__;i •FIAT CONMETE TILE ROOFING -- __._..._�____—•—_........_._..._...........___..._ .PAINTED MOOD FASCIAS STUCCO FINISII •G Q 1� n � �,j _ .PAINTED MOOD TRIM AT FRONT 1 �'�'y •SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORS N —•'— -DIVIDED LITE WINDOWS AT FRONT F-11 T,COI-'---- it 2C • GILL SCHOOL SITE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES PRESLEY COMPANIES _ t Doelus � 5 a p iELI :.....i" o' _ � m Ffl Dm[E m Fl 2A RIGHT o 2A REAR --------------------------------------- . T ' ❑ 1113 �;_:::-: _ f 2A LEFT 2A ROOF IY'1 GILL SCHOOL SITE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES PRESLEY COMPANIES C Ilk 6 ra va ra r-----------, 0 11 it l TIPML RGc. 11O I T RLt MWL II F� t f-I iOrm0ID NI GFA L0DG 1v eeL°n y 1 '''"'� a I ICJ v • J L-- •-I I 0 O 1 a B 2 I 1 LOFT 0 ,RI. ❑ 0 ..b �; .: r ----- B 3 '. BR 1 1 r------------------ $ GA GE , 1 1 I I I , v A 3A 5 BR FAMILY 3 BA + BONUS 2607 SF 3 5 BR F i MILY 3 BA 2276 SF . GILL SCHOOL SITE --- SINGLE FAMILY HOMES : PRESLEY COMPANIES R I11�1111. 4 BR FAMILY 3 BA DEN 7 I I 11 1 -FLAT CONCRETE TILE ROOFING r�i � I��^`., •STILE CONCRETE ROOFING —._..._...._. _._--..._. •PAINTED MOOD FASCIAS _ 1' •MINTED MOOD FASCIAS -STUCCO FINISII •STUCCO FIN191 -STUCCO TRIM AT FRONT I -STUCCO TRIM AT FRONT •SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORS ,I 1 •!' ' -SECTIONAL WRAOE DOORS •DIVIDED LITE WINDOWS AT FRONT 44 I .DIVIDED LITE WINDOWS AT FRONT _ i —-__ •CASTSRINT••VE.NEERIIIGIILIGlrrS i Ll 3A 3B -FLAT CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MINTED MOOD FASCIAS •STUCCO FINISII it .H a L -PAINTED MOLD TRIM AT FRONT o _ �cc •SECTIONAL GARAGE DOOMS N ••� -DIVIDED LITE WINDOWS AT FRONT _P r I T N 1 err J L� N 3C • GILL SCHOOL SITE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES PRESLEY COMPANIES W 1W ...� 8 •FLAT CONCRETE TILE ROOFING i I — J I I •STILE CONCRETE ROOFING _-- -PAINTED MOOD FASCIAS 1 ' .PAINTED MOOD FASCIAS STUCCO FINISH .STUCCO 1 TRIMTRIM •STUCCO TRIM AT FRONT � -STUCCO TRIM AT FRONT SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORS — -SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORS -DIVIDED LITE WINDOWS AT FROM' c r F --�� _ .DIVIDED LITE WINDOWS AT FP04T -MASONRY VENEER IIN.RILIGIM. —'\ � 1 . L 3XA 3XB S -FLAT CONCRETE TILr ROOFING PAINTED WOOD FASCIAS N •STUCCO FINISII PAINTED MOW TRIM AT FRONT (J _ •SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORS "— •DIVIDED LITE WINDOWS AT FRONT .1 .o 3XC GILL SCHOOL SITE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES PRESLEY COMPANIES lilt �US 9 0 >f.... Pi .z� CDEll 0 0 0 3A RIGHT 3A REAR ----------------------- ------------• ® 7 �U"O � __ 3A LEFT 3A ROOF IYm0 GILL SCHOOL SITE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES PRESLEY COMPANIES Il.li 11. Q HIM .I.H 10 t 1 /Y�'Y(1W NAIN +Jo'i f4R I 19'1 w•w YiwO(v.R.c+) I /wofebers 1r.•Iws SECTION A - A bo' rub ff or w.Y adr, I h idow 4v' 4. f[14TlY RbMf[4 vb.aeaaa b'on.rr �briaa flM* pIN/V0�0 Mh 4'aI.I11Mb IJ�h b'(U.RI.Ib/FiA SECTION B- B ._• GILL SCHOOL SITE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES PRESLEY COMPANIES L Ill:•R 1115 - n� I 1 F11k • ( ,,1_ Board of Trustees: HUNTINGTON BEACH UNION 1' Bonnie Bruce HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT Bonnie JohnsCastreon +° � Barbara Johnson i = Curt Jones Michael Simons z „ 10251 Yorktown Avenue • Huntington Beach, California 92646-2999 (714) 964-3339 FAX(714) 963-7684 David J. Hagen, Ed.D.,Superintendent of Schools Qh sc*A r. Mr. Howard Zelefsky April 21, 1995 Department of Community Development City of Huntington Beach 1 PFF 2 41995 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 926487. Dear Mr. Zelefsky: On behalf of the Huntington Beach Union High School District I have received notice of the meeting of the subdivision subcommittee of the Planning Commission to review Tentative Tract Map 14515 pertaining to a proposed 58 unit subdivision for single family dwellings on property located at 9800 Education Lane. District staff have analyzed the existing capacity of our schools and projected enrollment growth for the next few years. We find that internal growth and approved development will absorb our capacity and that enrollment generated by new development will impose a financial burden on the District due to the need for additional classroom and auxiliary space. Our analysis shows that the cost of adding permanent classroom space for new students is $28,277.80 per student, which consists of$15,676.97 for construction and furnishings and an additional $12,600.83 for the cost of land acquisition. Attached are details for these figures. _ For this proposed development we project an increase of 12 students, or a potential cost of $339,333.60. We estimate that the homes will generate $82,944.55 in developer fees, leaving a shortfall of $256,389.05. While we are sensitive to the burden that the costs of full mitigation place on a development, we are also concerned about the need to ensure that adequate classroom space is provided for the children of those home buyers. Therefore, we request that, prior to approval of the Tentative Tract Map, the City require the developer to enter negotiations with the District for mitigation of the impact of the proposed development on our schools. I would be pleased to meet with representatives of the developer and City staff to discuss this matter further. Sincerely, Patricia Reid Koch, Ph.D. Assistant Superintendent, Business Services Attachment The mission of the HBUHSD, responsive to our diverse community expectations, is to educate all students by ensuring a relevant and focused educational program which develops responsible,productive and creative individuals with a capacity for leadership. Huntington Beach Union Hi School District • S-12 Configurtion Cost Estimaim Per Squaro Foot of Euil .fe* Typlcal Elemenbry Schocl Site Statistic; Statistic Adjustments Factor Description Acres 40.00 Geographic 1OO:0rnge 1,742,400 Small Building : <. NANo Lind Sq.Ft. Students 2.400 Index Adius',menf ;<>;:::`:;::: ; > Lee Saylor Net Sq I .Ft per Student 91 Urban ` >N/A No t Student S4 Security ><"N!A`:No Gross Sq.FL per <> >:............ Net Building Sq.Ft. 218,400 Base Faed Fe-_Building Costs $85.74 Gross Building Sq. F1. 225,E,00 Structures-Slo 1 Cost Inflator 100.00% Building Class D ry q Cale9 c Factors Unit CS t Per Total Costs Total Cost Per Total . ludent hard Cds1s.... :..:..:..:.. . Euilding Costs. .. Faed 5, .74 520,909,358 53It12.25 Adjustmenls Lea Saylor $0.00 SO SO.C•D On-Site Deve!cpr,.ent-Gceenl S.CO% Of Euilding Ccsts $4.79 $1,045,470 543,5.E1 On-Site Develcpment- G.•r•.c Dl 57,500 Per Ac.e S1.37 5300,COD S125M On-Site Development- Scr.;ccs 7.5.0% Of Building Ccs!s $7.18 51,56Z,2C•5 Sc53.42 Utility Services 250% Of Euilding Ccsts S2.39 S522,7Z5 5217.E1 OlfSite Inprmernenis i0.CQ% Of Euilding Cwts S9.57 52,050,9•a S{71.22 Energy N.anz5ement 3.00% Of Euilding Costs S2.E7 $c27,2E2 S251.37 Other Hard Costs 1.C•D% Of Euildino Ccsts SO.c3 5209,D94 :'Z7.12 (lard Ccs,SuG Tctof S124.88 S27,273,123 S i 1,363.60 S0ft.Cos s .... ...-:.. !-Arch./Eno.Fees 7.50% Of Hard CcSts 59.37 $2,045,4r4 -cc 12.29 lr.F=c;ior.Tests 2.9E0% Of Hacd Ccs.s S3.12 c581,626 S264.10 Han Check Fees 0.755; Of Hard Ccsts $0.94 5204,5445 $e5.23 Utility Fees 0.2556 Of Hard Ccsts $0.31 $68,183 528.41 t:n•rironrentalDocurr,cnli!:cn tW,Ce00 Per Site $0.14 $30,000 $i2.50 /•.rcheacloc;cat Sur:cy $5,000 Per Site $11.02 55pazi 52.08 ::oils Report 520,COO Per See S0.O9 $20,000' 55.33 :tile Surrey $7,5C•0 Per See $0,03 $7,500 $3.13 !•ppmisal E Esc:ovr Costs 55O,CC•0 Per S e $0.23 ew,OCy0 _ $20.E3 Administr<tive Ccs!s 3.CO56 Of Hard Ccsis S3.75 $518,194 S.'�.9i ltclocation Costs �-O Per Si:,e $O.CD $O SO.OD r,ther Soft Costs 0.15% Of Hard Costs 11-0.19 540,9 It 0 $17XG oR Cost iI"frr m2 C uo8rs e,Tl ES e tubh nTotal' :..... S/8.19 S3,971,647 S1654.85::::: Equipm9e n F V.00 : Per Eldo.Se-Ft. $7.00 51,528,800 $637.60 Kr. T,:chnolocy 8 Media $14.00 Per Eldo.So.Ft. $14.00 $3,057,6CO $1,274.00 IF1EBTechrologf Sub-Tc1.rl S21.00 S4,586,400 S1,911.00 Mird/Soft L FFBE Cost Su!,-Total $164.06 $35,831,170 $14,929.65 1:r,nsIructron'Contin�cncy ;:::,.::,•:::.:;.:;::>•;;:...:,:. :; :;•>:::.: 1.50% Of Sul-To $2.46 5537,;iM $223.94 :.+ate Contingency �ld :.+ale Contingency 52,000 Per School ,$0.01 $2,GO0 SO.63 1,--:trict Conlingency 3.50% Of SLL-Tc!zl 55.74 $1,254.091 S522.52 r.onstrvcGon ContinUcnq•Scb•Tofal 58.21 51,793,558 S747.32 I!.ird/Soft,FFBE,L Corrt:-;•:rrcy Sub-Total $172.27 $37,624,72S $15,676.97 $37,624,729 1 .ntd ... $720,000 Per Acre S131.87 $28,£r^0,0.10 S12,DCO.C� I.,nd Cost Sub-Tot;,l S 131.67 S28,600,000 S 12.000.00 1 .md Contingency:.:. ,.-....... .... .: ...... ..... c .......... ...... . ......: :•+•,le Conlingency 1.50% Of Sub-Tcl2l S1.S-S $432,CCO $180.N : I-rle Contingency $2,OCO 'Per School 50.01 $2,ON 50.83 1-.-.trict Contingency 3.5056 Of.Sub-Tclal 5,4.62 S1,00S,003 c420.03 I.md Con'ngency Sub-Tc:jl S5.60 S1,442,000 :600.63 1 .,lid 3 Contingency SuU-T,.1.,1 $13S.47 $30,242,000 $12,600.S3 S30,2:2,000 '1•.lal Construction/Land C,;;1 per Sq.Ft. $310.75 $67.866,729 32S,277.50 S67,S66,72S l rrl d Support F�CiGI ct "` . _. I '-rim Facilities .... ;t! Fer`0 StLder.,s .-. ..: -QC1O...:-.::: . .... .:. :. .:.. SO.CU::...... -;;,port Faciiltics :0.00 Per t\eI Sq. Ft. 4D.CJ 50.Co l.!•.rium S Sur•:porr F�c'.c,: b Tefa! 50.00 50 S5C0 (JI AND TOTAL. C0:;1 1:1'fl SO. FT. $310.75 $67,s66,72S i 525,277.S0 ••woe:Co'--:1y sy,�,..., �.,-J.ie., Inc. - COSTS.%LS Golden West Neighborhood Association G Neighborhood PO Box 1086 w Association Huntington Beach, CA 92647 May 1, 1995 Planning Committee Huntington Beach Planning Division City Hall 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Planning Committee: On behalf of the Golden West Neighborhood Association, I am writing to you regarding the development of the Gill School site. In previous meetings with Mr. Herb Fauland of the Huntington Beach Planning Division, our association was assured that any new development of the Gill School would be compatible with our existing neighborhood. We sincerely hope that this goal is carried out. Our understanding is that the Presley Cos. of Newport Beach is now in the planning stage of developing this site. Our neighborhood association has had several meetings concerning the development of the Gill School site and wish to express the following concerns. ♦ Currently the homes in our tract are approximately 6000 square feet each. We request that any new development be kept at approximately the same existing density level as we have now, with a maximum limitation being 58 single family homes. ♦ New lots which border the streets of Victoria and Cumberland should have the front of the new lots face Victoria and Cumberland. These new lots should also have the same lot widths, parkways and sidewalks as those homes which currently exist on these streets. ♦ If two story homes are being built, that they be blended in with our basically single story neighborhood as much as possible. The massive fronts of any two story homes should be minimized. and/or avoided. May 1, 1995 Page 2 ♦ Offsetting of the windows and new home locations, etc., to provide for maximum privacy for the homes adjacent to the new development should be a priority. In addition, we would like 7 foot high block wall fences and no raised foundations for these new homes. ♦ As it was explained to the association, a tot lot or similar facility would be required for a new development of this size. Instead of the tot lot, our association instead would like to see improvements made to nearby Greer Park. The improvements requested [in order of importance] are lighting, improved play equipment and new benches surrounding the play areas. It is my understanding the committee is tentatively scheduled to meet on May 23rd at 7pm to discuss this matter. Could you please advise me when this date is confirmed. Thank- you very much and I look forward to hearing from you soon. Sincerely, ( , J"�' Susan Westley 15222 Nottingham Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Office Phone# (714) 892-9777 Home Phone# (714) 898-6277 sw\ \gwna-cty cc: Scott Minami (Presley Co.) Jim Ingle (Huntington Beach Parks & Recreation) :v. } n:.:i;>::{':}::;�:::>:;,:}> :>.:{{<.>:f':;.:a:>.}:.;:.:;};:>::>:;:.}:;};;:;:}i:.}:::;::}:{.:;.}:�;::::;::?:t{.;:::;'�>:::}:{.:::::>:<;:::{•;:.;}>;.}:{.;;:::;.}>:.}}:{t;;:.:b:;.::;::.;:;.}:::;.}:.},:;.;:.}:.i:;}}:.»;.;:b<:}.:ti:{.>:<;:»;};};::;;.}:.}};}:.}::}:.:.;:a;.;::i:.}:.;:.}i'.}'?•ii}:}:.}'•;;;;>:.;:. ....v v:\x•:v•.......... w:.v, is.. +:..�.i:; ! � :: {::: } i.�•. :: •:{:�.�:i: i:•��i: i:::::i: :i:::::: :: �:'•:i:i� �•�'::: :ii: i..�v::: :iS:::� { i:: �C:: ��•. :v::i<'C::ii:::::i:}�iii:}?`:::�ii:icy:�(::::i::::i::'::i:::ti:�i::�::::F::ii :-0{vv:;,4..vv:::::.•;^::::::.v:.v:w::::::::::::::•:::::.�:::::::.:v.:v::::::::::::::::::::.�:::::::::::::.v::.:v:.vnv:::::::::::::::::.:v:::::.v:::. •::.. rv..v.v..::r'}::.•.vv. .:. ....4....f.....:.::•}}+}};{?{a}}}}%::::::::::.+:v::::.�.�:::::.......w::::::::::::::::::::.:vw::::::.v::::......•w:::::::nw:::;n..... ..................:. ... ..:.{{.}}}:v}+v::::.:;;••.v::::::is vr.r.: n•,r...n;}:::.....:r}.. :.:::.v:. x.vnv; .::w..........-.•.........:::::......:::..... ..................m:. ::.v:n....{� ..:.?,..v•::::::,{•::::;f............n;...v,�.:.?:....v:.:...........'.;::::::::v.....:....i:.n;vn:'+ny.:::}...:..xv:::•,::::::.}}'.::}:::..�.:::::.}}}}};.Siii}}:n}}:�iii:vv}}:?b;{•:}:{•}};a};'^};?•}:{.}?}}}}}iY}}::}i:{•}}}:{� :::::v.•:.v a ::•}:'•�.n.}.r...nr...{}•{^::;b;.}%r.:?•}}Si Y. r.. ..v; n .: :.. rk v / 4 J.. .'f.:}rr. ::.{,•.•r:::::w:::n::w::::n:w:::::n:::•:x::.:r:v'r};{.}}}:•}::{:;a}'r}}y: ..;. .:.:}n.,..ry;: ...�.. .....r.., .......n ............................................................:.........r::::::nv:::rw........::.}:{{4:4}Y•i}in}•}}}}ii:;•}:•}}iii`•i:.v:{b:bii::b};q}:{}Y.ti4:tJ}}:•}}:titi{:.}:ti4::{:�:;.y:::n•. ::.., r..;}.{. ...} Fix. ,.:,..} .... ....:......................{........................................................................................v...............:...........................................................n....:.;}:...,v;•:. ...v+.xx.v.,..nv n{p:..Uvv\.;.f:r•:..}:}{.;;.,.......:....... {:v:::nw:;........w:::w......................:....::.......................... ..,....... ..n...}:..r}^,...x� .v..ry.. .... x.............:.... ::: .�::::..:.:v::..:.::.v...:::::::.::::w.:,::;..::n.•:..::nv;:??{.}}:iv.}y .vv.:.p v b .. bf.{vfF....,..b..+4.,..{F v .....v........v n....:.............. ::} ... .. �.: ... w ...f..v :.:: ..;,...::. •. ...: ...,.�v..vr.• }.:::{;v::::..•:::n•.�.�::.,•::::::::•.:.:::n•:...::::n :.;:.;••;:•i:.ii::{:::•}:{•}i:;•;;{•:;.}:;?;.i:.:}:.}>:.::•;:.;:b:•;;•;:.:;i:.;;•}:;•>:.>:.}:•}:•>}:.}}:•:}:•}::�:::.::•:{•}:.:.i:.>:.;:.;:.i:i}:.;}:ai:{{•:::.�}:•}:•::.:•}:.:t: 1. Name of Proponent: Kaufman & Broad - South Coast, Inc. Address: 100 Bayview, Suite 100 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Phone Number: (714) 725-4430 2. Date Checklist Submitted for Review: November 8, 1994 3. Concurrent Entitlement(s): Zone Change No. 94-4 Tentative Tract Map No. 14990 Conditional Use Permit No. 94-26 4. Proiect Location: Southeast corner of Cumberland Drive and Victoria Lane (Closed Gill Elementary School site) 5. Proiect Description: To permit the rezoning of the Gill Elementary School site by removing the Community Facilities-Educational (CF-E) overlay from the underlying Residential Low Density (RL) designation for the subdivision of approximately 8.82 net acres into 58 lots. The project includes construction of 58 two (2) story, single family residences as part of a planned residential development. The proposed tract, generally located north of McFadden Avenue and west of Goldenwest Street, will gain access from Cumberland Drive and Victoria Lane. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of answers are included after each subsection.) 1. Earth. Yes Maybe No Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or changes in geologic substructures? _ _ X b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? X _ _ c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X _ d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? _ _ X e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils,either on or off the site? _ X _ f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? _ _ X g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure,or similar hazards? _ _ X Discussion: The project consists of the rezoning of a closed elementary school site for single family residential purposes. Implementation of the proposed project will require less than 500 cubic yards of grading, which will be balanced on-site, to prepare the site for dwelling unit and street construction. The project site is not located in the vicinity of the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone or other known seismic/geologic hazards. No adverse seismic or soils conditions, or other geotechnical hazards are expected to occur in the vicinity of the site. With standard conditions of approval requiring submittal of a soils report for review and approval by the City Engineer, no significant adverse impacts are anticipated. 2. Air. Yes Mavbe No Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? _ X _ b. The creation of objectionable odors? _ _ X c. Alteration of air movement, moisture,or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? _ _ X Discussion: The project may result in a short-term increase in construction-related emissions, lasting for approximately 120 days. Emissions are expected from gasoline and diesel-powered grading and paving equipment and fugitive dust generation associated with earth moving activities. However, with the implementation of conditions of approval minimizing dust, and emissions resulting from construction equipment, no significant adverse air quality impacts are anticipated. Environmental Checklist Page 2 EA 94-14 Long-term operational emissions may increase slightly due to the approximate 340 additional vehicle trips contributed by the project. However, the additional trips generated by the 58 single family residences do not exceed the SCAQMD thresholds for projects with potentially significant air quality impacts. No significant air quality impacts to the area are anticipated. 3. Water. Yes Maw No Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? _ _ X b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? X c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? _ _ X e. Discharge into surface waters,or in any alteration of surface water quality,including but not limited to temperature,dissolved oxygen or turbidity? _ _ X f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? _ X g. Change in the quantity of ground waters,either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? _ _ X h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? _ X _ i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? _ — X Discussion: The proposed project will result in the minor alteration of topography to facilitate drainage and runoff. The project will result in an increase in the amount surface runoff due to the expansion of impervious surfaces. Proposed drainage will follow the natural gradient toward the southwest (Victoria Lane and Halifax Road) section of the project. According to the City's Public Works Department, the existing storm drain system will be able to accommodate the project's runoff. With standard conditions of approval requiring the review of hydrology studies and approval of drainage plans by the City Engineer, no adverse drainage impacts are anticipated. The proposed project will require the installation of new water lines, and is anticipated to use approximately 20,000 gallons of water per day. Based on discussions with the Public Works Department, Water Division, the City has an adequate supply and facilities to provide the additional 20,000 gallons per day. Standard conditions of approval requiring water conservation measures including the use of water saver toilets, low flow fixtures, and drought tolerant landscaping will further minimize water usage; no significant adverse impacts to the existing water supply are anticipated. The project area is located with Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Zone X which is not in the 100-year floodplain and is not subject to flood insurance or floodproofing requirements. No adverse impacts resulting from flooding or tidal waves are anticipated. Environmental Checklist Page 3 EA 94-14 4. Plant Life. Yes Maybe No Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants(including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? X b. Reduction of the numbers of any mature,unique,rare or endangered species of plants? _ _ X c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? _ _ X d. Reduction in acreage of an agricultural crop? _ _ X Discussion: Plant life on the project site consists of playground turf and various trees, the majority of which are along the perimeter of the site. Trees on the project site include pines and sycamores, as well as other common landscaping shrubs and bushes. The construction of 58 new homes may result in the removal of several trees from the site. However, the trees are not rare or endangered species. With recommended mitigation requiring the preservation of all mature trees to the greatest extent possible, or replacement of all mature trees on a 2:1 ratio, no significant adverse impacts to plant life are anticipated. Miti at'g ion: 1. All mature trees shall be identified as to type, size and location on a tree plan submitted to the Department of Community Development and Public Works. The development of the subdivision shall retain all existing mature trees to the greatest extent possible, with a concentration of trees along the perimeter of the project. However, should existing trees require removal as part of the development, they shall be replaced within the subdivision at a 2:1 ratio. If a 2:1 replacement of trees on-site is not feasible, the applicant may provide the balance of trees to adjoining properties through the establishment of a tree voucher program. The program will be run by the applicant, subject to the supervision and approval of the Department of Community Development. The program shall be reviewed by the City's Landscape and Planning Divisions prior to removal of any tree or issuance of a grading permit, whichever occurs first. 5. Animal Life. Yes Maybe No Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species,or numbers of any species of animals(birds,land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish,benthic organisms or insects)? _ _ X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? _ _ X c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area,or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? _ _ X d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? _ _ X Environmental Checklist Page 4 EA 94-14 • • Discussion: The project area consists of a variety of animal species including domestic dogs and cats, squirrels and various bird species. The proposed project will not result in any loss to endangered or sensitive animal species. No significant impacts to animal wildlife are anticipated. 6. Noise. Yes Mavbe No Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? _ X _ b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X Discussion: The project will generate short-term noise impacts during construction with the use of heavy construction equipment, including jack hammers, graders, backhoes, and water, cement and dump trucks. However, all construction noise will be required to comply with Chapter 8.40 Noise of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code, and through the implementation and compliance of standard conditions of approval, no significant noise impacts during construction are anticipated. Long-term noise impacts may occur as a result of the increase in trip-ends and associated vehicular noise generated by the new subdivision. However, due to the low level of traffic generated by the project, and the ambient noise from the existing uses, the noise levels generated by the project are considered negligible. All noise will be required to remain in compliance with the City's Noise Code. No significant noise impacts are anticipated. 7. Li ht and Glare. Yes Maybe No Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X _ Discussion: The development of a 58 lot planned residential development will result in new light sources including street and residential lighting. The surrounding area is primarily built-out with single family residential units. The proposed project will allow for development of similar single family residential units and will include the same type of lighting sources which presently exist in the area. While the project will result in increased illumination in the area, the project contribution to ambient lighting levels is not considered significant. With implementation of standard conditions of approval requiring the directing of lights in a manner to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties, and restricting use of glare producing/reflective materials, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 8. Land Use. Yes Maybe No Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X Discussion: The project consists of the removal of the present Community Facilities-Educational zoning overlay on the property to the underlying Residential Low Density (RL) zoning. Over the past 17 years, the existing school site has been used by the Orange County Department of Education for their Special Education program. The Westminster School District has indicated that the County's special education program has been relocated to the Sequoia School in Westminster. Environmental Checklist Page 5 EA 94-14 The proposed subdivision will result in construction of 58 new single family dwelling units on the abandoned school site. The proposed project is consistent with the Low Density Residential General Plan land use designation, and will be compatible with the surrounding single family residential uses, as the new homes will generally be constructed using similar development standards as the surrounding homes. No significant adverse impacts are anticipated. For discussion on loss of school site and open space, please refer to items 14c and 18, respectively. 9. Natural Resources. Yes Maybe No Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X b. Substantial depletion of any non-renewable natural resource? _ _ X Discussion: . Natural gas will be provided to the residences by the Southern California Gas Company, and will not result in a significant increase in the rate of use of any natural or non-renewable energy resource. The existing So. Calif. Gas Co. facilities are adequate to accommodate the additional development. No significant adverse impacts to natural resources are anticipated. 10. Risk of Upset. Yes Mavbe No Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances(including,but not limited to oil,pesticides, chemicals or radiation)in the event of an accident or upset conditions? _ X _ b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? _ _ X Discussion: The proposed subdivision and construction of 58 new single family residences will not involve the use of any hazardous materials and will not result in any impediments to emergency response or evacuation plans. The existing school site is within the recommended five (5) minute response area from both Heil and Murdy Fire Stations. Grading and excavation of the project site will result in the storage of diesel fuel in a small tank on site during the excavation and construction phase of the project. Several school buildings containing asbestos will require removal upon demolition of the buildings. With implementation of recommended mitigation measures, no significant impacts resulting from hazardous materials or emergency access are anticipated. Mitigation: 1. Prior to demolition, the abandoned school buildings containing asbestos shall be identified, and removed in compliance with City, State and Federal standards. An asbestos abatement program shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer and Building Official. 2. The placement and storage of the diesel tank(s) or any flammable substance shall be reviewed and approved by the Huntington Beach Fire Department prior to construction. Environmental Checklist Page 6 EA 94-14 11. Population. Yes Maybe No Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density,or growth rate of the human population of an area? X Discussion: The proposed project will replace an abandoned elementary school with 58 new single family residences, which is consistent with the Low Density Residential General Plan land use designation, and anticipated build-out of the area. Based on an average Huntington Beach household size of 2.7 persons, approximately 156 persons will occupy the new homes. No significant adverse impacts resulting from the subdivision are anticipated. 12. Housin . Yes Maybe No Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? _ _ X Discussion: The proposed subdivision will provide 58 additional single family residences, of which 10 %-15 % will be set aside for lower income families. No significant adverse impacts to the existing housing stock are anticipated. 13. Transportation/Circulation. Yes Mavbe No Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? X b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new off-site parking? _ _ X c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? _ X _ d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? _ X _ e. Alterations to waterborne,rail or air traffic? _ _ X f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,bicyclists or pedestrians? _ X _ Discussion: As depicted in the"Gill School Site Traffic Study," prepared for the applicant by Robert Kahn, John Kain & Assoc., development of the proposed project will generate approximately 580 vehicular daily trips, with 45 vehicles per hour during the AM peak hour and 60 vehicles per hour during the PM peak hour. The project will increase the existing number of daily trips through the local streets by approximately 340 trips, based on approximately 240 vehicle trips which was generated for the school. The project will add a maximum of 320 ADT to Victoria Lane, 120 ADT to Cumberland Drive, and 120 ADT to Oxford Drive. The expected project traffic contribution is between 0.2 % and 0.6 % during the AM peak hour and 0.3 % to 0.8 % during the PM peak hour to the area intersections, and 0.1 % to 13.7 % to roadway links. Existing intersections in the area are currently operating at a level of service of D or better, with the exception of the Bolsa/Goldenwest intersection which is operating at a level of service E during the PM peak hour. Although there is an expected increase in traffic, the development is projected to have a negligible impact to circulation levels of service in the area. There will be no change in the level of service for the intersections in the area. Environmental Checklist Page 7 EA 94-14 The proposed local street section within the project site consists of a 52 foot right of way, with 40 feet from curb to curb, and two (2), six foot wide sidewalks. Vehicular access to the subdivision will be provided from Victoria Lane at Halifax Drive, and from Cumberland Drive. Parking for the subdivision will be provided independently on each lot, with either a two or three car garage and a 20 foot driveway. Based on discussions with the City's Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering Division, traffic and circulation impacts resulting from the project are not considered significant. With implementation of standard conditions of approval or City specifications, including payment for phased construction of traffic signals, conformance of the proposed street systems to City standards, review and approval of street improvement plans, and payment of traffic impact fees, no significant traffic impacts are anticipated. 14. Public Services. Yes Maybe No Will the proposal have an effect upon,or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? _ _ X b. Police protection? _ _ X c. Schools? X d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? _ _ X f. Other governmental services? _ _ X Discussion: The proposed subdivision will permanently remove a closed elementary school site, and in turn generate approximately 22 additional students to the Westminster School District (K-8). The Westminster School District has determined that the school site is surplus, and that the existing districts facilities can accommodate the additional students generated by the project. The proposed project has initially been reviewed by the various City Departments, including Public Works, Fire, Police, Community Services, and Community Development, for compliance with all applicable City Codes. With the implementation of standard conditions of approval, and compliance with City specifications, no significant adverse impacts to public services are anticipated. 15. Enemy. Yes Maybe No Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? _ _ X b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing source of energy,or require the development of sources of energy? _ _ X Discussion: Please refer to the discussion under #9 (a-b). Environmental Checklist Page 8 EA 94-14 16. Utilities. Yes IViaybe No Will the proposal result in a need for new systems,or substantial alterations to the followring utilities: a. Power or natural gas? X b. Communication systems? X c. Water? X d. Sewer or septic tanks? X e. Storm water drainage? X f. Solid waste and disposal? X Discussion: The project will require incremental extensions of public services and utilities to the site, which will be provided by the different governmental agencies and utility companies. Water utilized by the development would be approximately 20,000 gallons per day. Based on discussions with the Department of Public Works, Water Division, the City can adequately provide the quantity of water for the proposed project. In addition, approximately 900 pounds of solid waste will be generated per day, which will be collected by the Rainbow Disposal Company. With the implementation of standard conditions of approval on water conservation measures, no adverse impacts to the City's existing water supply and other utilities are anticipated. 17. Human Health. Yes Maybe No Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard(excluding mental health)? _ X _ b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? _ X _ Discussion: Grading and excavation of the project site will result in the storage of diesel fuel in a small tank on site during the excavation and construction phase of the project. Several school buildings contain asbestos which will require removal upon demolition of the buildings. With implementation of mitigation, no hazards to human health will result from the project. N iti ation: Prior to demolition, the abandoned school buildings which contain asbestos shall be identified, and removed in compliance with City, State and Federal standards. An asbestos abatement program shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer and Building Official. 18. Aesthetics. Yes Maybe Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X Environmental Checklist Page 9 EA 94-14 Discussion: The proposed development will remove an existing elementary school site, including a generous amount of open space. However, the project's density and two (2) story design is consistent with zoning, and will be compatible with the surrounding residences. The proposed tract will also be required to comply with the residential infill lot ordinance, further assuring compatibility with existing single family residential properties adjacent to the project site. No adverse aesthetic impacts are anticipated. 19. Recreation. Yes Maybe No Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X Discussion: The project will reduce the amount of open space and recreational opportunities in the immediate area with the development over the school fields and courts. The Community Services Department has indicated that Greer Park, located near the intersection of McFadden Avenue and Goldenwest Street is within the recommended service area for the proposed tract and other tracts in the area. In lieu of developing the required recreational area within the proposed tract, the developer has tentatively agreed to provide off-site park improvements at Greer Park over and above the required park and recreation in-leiu fees as specified by the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. The additional park improvements will further reduce impacts to recreational opportunities for residents in the area; no significant adverse impacts are anticipated. 20. Cultural Resources. Yes Maybe No a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? _ _ X b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? _ _ X c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? _ _ X d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? _ _ X Discussion: The project site is not in the vicinity of any known archaeological, historical or other cultural resources. No significant adverse impacts are anticipated. 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance. Yes Maybe No a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels,threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X Environmental Checklist Page 10 EA 94-14 b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term,to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief,definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) _ X c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited,but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small,but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) _ X d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,either directly or indirectly? _ _ X DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: ❑ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. 40 I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. ❑ I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. // - 23 _4 � Signature Date For: City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department Format Revised: September, 1993 Environmental Checklist Page 11 EA 94-14 Mitigation Measures 1. All mature trees shall be identified as to type, size and location on a tree plan submitted to the Department of Community Development and Public Works. The development of the subdivision shall retain all existing mature trees to the greatest extent possible, with a concentration of trees along the perimeter of the project. However, should existing trees require removal as part of the development, they shall be replaced within the subdivision at a 2:1 ratio. If a 2:1 replacement of trees on-site is not feasible, the applicant may provide the balance of trees to adjoining properties through the establishment of a tree voucher program. The program will be run by the applicant, subject to the supervision and approval of the Department of Community Development. The program shall be reviewed by the City's Landscape and Planning Divisions prior to removal of any tree or issuance of a grading permit, whichever occurs first. 2. Prior to demolition, the abandoned school buildings containing asbestos shall be identified, and removed in compliance with City, State and Federal standards. An asbestos abatement program shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer and Building Official. 3. The placement and storage of the diesel tank(s) or any flammable substance shall be reviewed and approved by the Huntington Beach Fire Department prior to construction. 4. Prior to demolition, the abandoned school buildings which contain asbestos shall be identified, and removed in compliance with City, State and Federal standards. An asbestos abatement program shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer and Building Official. Environmental Checklist Page 12 EA 94-14 i • RESPONSE TO COMMENTS NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 94-14 I. INTRODUCTION This document serves as the Response to Comments on the Negative Declaration No. 94-14. This document contains all information available in the public record related to the Negative Declaration as of Tuesday, December 20, 1994 and responds to comments in accordance with Section 15088 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. This document contains six sections. In addition to this Introduction, these sections are Public Participation and Review, Comments, Responses to Comments, Errata to the Draft Negative Declaration, and Appendix. The Public Participation section outlines the methods the City of Huntington Beach has used to provide public review and solicit input on the Negative Declaration. The Comments section contains those written comments received from agencies, groups, organizations, and individuals as of Tuesday, December 20, 1994. The Response to Comments section contains individual responses to each comment. The Errata to the Draft Negative Declaration is provided to show corrections of errors and inconsistencies in the Draft Negative Declaration. It is the intent of the City of Huntington Beach to include this document in the official public record related to the Negative Declaration. Based on the information contained in the public record the decision makers will be provided with an accurate and complete record of all information related to the environmental consequences of the project. II. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND REVIEW The City of Huntington Beach notified all responsible and interested agencies and interested groups, organizations, and individuals that a Negative Declaration had been prepared for the proposed project. The City also used several methods to solicit input during the review period for the preparation of the Negative Declaration. The following is a list of actions taken during the preparation, distribution, and review of the Negative Declaration. 1. An official twenty (20) day public review period for the Negative Declaration began on Thursday, December 1, 1994 and ended on Tuesday, December 20, 1994. Public comment letters were accepted by the City of Huntington Beach through Tuesday, December 20, 1994. 2. Notice of the Negative Declaration was published in the Huntington Beach Independent on Thursday, December 1, 1994. Upon request, copies of the document were distributed to agencies, groups, organizations, and individuals. III. COMMENTS Copies of all written comments received as of Tuesday, December 20, 1994 are contained in the Appendix of this document. All comments have been numbered and are listed on the following pages. All comments from letters received have been retyped verbatim in a comment-response format for clarity. Responses to Comments for each comment which raised an environmental issue are contained in this document. IV. RESPONSE TO COMMENTS The Negative Declaration No. 94-14 was distributed to responsible agencies, interested groups, organizations, and individuals. The report was made available for public review and comment for a period of twenty (20) days. The public review period for the Negative Declaration established by the City commenced on December 1, 1994. Copies of all documents received as of Tuesday, December 20, 1994 are contained in the Appendix of this report. Comments have been numbered with responses correspondingly numbered. Responses are presented for each comment which raised a significant environmental issue. Several comments do not address the completeness or adequacy of the Negative Declaration, do not raise significant environmental issues, or request additional information. A substantive response to such comments is not appropriate within the context of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Such comments are responded to with a "comment acknowledged" reference. This indicates that the comment will be forwarded to all appropriate decision makers for their review and consideration. HBEB-1 Comment: The City of Huntington Beach Environmental Board has received and reviewed the above mentioned project (Negative Declaration No. 94-14). This project consists of the rezoining of the Gill Elementary underlaying Residential Low Density (RL) designation for the subdivision of approximately 8.82 acres into 58 lots. The project includes the construction of 58 two (2) story single family residences as part of a planned residential development. Response: Comment states project description for project identification purposes and does not require any substantive response. i • HBEB-2 Comment: The Environmental Board feels that a Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate level of environmental review for this project. In addition to the areas of concern addressed in the ND, the Board feels that the following issues need to be addressed: Response: Comment states Environmental Board's concurrence that a Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate level of environmental review for the project, provided several issues are addressed. Comment acknowledged and will be forwarded to decision makers prior to action on the proposed project. HBEB-3 Comment: Item 11, Population--The discussion states that the population for this area is expected to increase by approximately 156 people based on the Huntington Beach average of 2.7 inhabitants per household. the proposed homes are to be two (2) story single family homes, which are usually large, thus it would seem that more than 2.7 people would reside in each one. Perhaps a more realistic population increase and its potential impact on transportation and circulation should be evaluated. Response: The factor of 2.7 persons per household had been taken from 1990 Census data. It may be presumed that there will be a higher ratio of persons residing in these homes, however there is no data to verify it. Traffic and Circulation impacts have been addressed in Section 13 of the Negative Declaration. Comment acknowledged and will be forwarded to decision makers prior to action on the proposed project. HBEB-4 Comment: Itew 18, Aesthetics--The discussion states that the two (2) story design is compatible with the surrounding residences. This statement is questionable in light of the fact that the surrounding homes are single story. Response: The proposed two (2) story homes will attempt to be compatible with the surrounding residences by providing a one story element in the front of the home, and increased rear yard setbacks. Of the three building plans and rune (9) different floor plans proposed, only one (1) floor plan has a two story element over the garage. The majority of homes will be one story in height along the front (street) elevation. HBEB-S Comment: Item 19, Recreation--Additional information is required to assess the adequacy of the "tentatively agreed to" off site park improvements at Greer Park. Response: At the time of the completion of the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration, the City had not determined the amount of funds to be collected for improvements to Greer Park. However, the Department of Community Services has been negotiating with the applicant for an equitable value. The final decision on the amount of improvements will be made by the Planning Commission. Comment acknowledged and will be forwarded to decision makers prior to action on the proposed project. HBEB-6 Comment: Mitigation Measures, Page 12--Is mitigation measure (4) a repetition error or was measure (4) to address a different topic? Response: Measure (4) is a repetition error. The correction is reflected in the errata section. HBEB-7 Comment: The Environmental Board recommends approval of ND 94-14 subject to resolution of the above issues. If you have any questions regarding our comments, please contact Norman Smith, ND Committee Chair. Response: Comment acknowledged and will be forwarded to decision makers prior to action on the proposed project. V. ERRATA TO DRAFT NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following changes to the Draft Negative Declaration and Initial Study Checklist are as noted below. The changes to the Draft Negative Declaration as they relate to issues contained within this errata sheet do not affect the overall conclusions of the environmental document. The changes are identified by the comment reference. Subsequent to completion and circulation of the Draft Negative Declaration, City staff received a letter from the Huntington Beach Environmental Board requesting clarification on several issues. Specifically, the Board had comments on the discussion on population, aesthetics (compatibility), recreation, and mitigation measures. The following revisions to the original checklist were completed to address the comments received from the Huntington Beach Environmental Board: • Population, pg. 7 (item 11): Discussion: The proposed project will replace an abandoned elementary school with 58 new single family residences, which is consistent with the Low Density Residential General Plan land use designation, and anticipated build-out of the area. Based on an average Huntington Beach household size of 2.7 persons (1990 Census data), approximately 156 persons will occupy the new homes. No significant adverse impacts resulting from the subdivision are anticipated. • Aesthetics, page 9 (item 18): Discussion: The proposed development will remove an existing elementary school site, including a generous amount of open space. However, the project's density and two (2) story design is consistent with zoning, and will be designed to be compatible with the surrounding residences. The proposed homes will provide a one story element in the front of the home, and increased rear yard setbacks. Of the three building plans and nine (9) different floor plans proposed, only one (1) floor plan has a two story element over the garage. The majority of homes will be one story in height along the front (street) elevation. In addition, the proposed tract will be required to comply with the residential infill lot ordinance, further assuring compatibility with existing single family residential properties adjacent to the project site. No adverse aesthetic impacts are anticipated. + Recreation, page 10 (item 19): Discussion: The project will reduce the amount of open space and recreational opportunities in the immediate area with the development over the school fields and courts. The Community Services Department has indicated that Greer Park, located near the intersection of McFadden Avenue and Goldenwest Street is within the recommended service area for the proposed tract and other tracts in the area. In lieu of developing the required recreational area within the proposed tract, the developer has tentatively agreed to provide off-site park improvements at Greer Park over and above the required park and recreation in-leiu fees as specified by the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. The additional park improvements will further reduce impacts to recreational opportunities for residents in the area; no significant adverse impacts are anticipated. Final determination on the additional park improvements will be made by the Planning Commission. NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 94-14 APPENDIX A To: Mary Beth Ormsby -pate: December 20, 1994 Assistant Planner f From: City of Huntington Beach DEC 2 0 1994 Environmental Board Subject : Negative Declaration No. 94-14 The City of Huntington Beach Environmental Board has received and reviewed the above referenced project. This project consists of the rezoning of the Gill Elementary School site by removing the Community Facilities-Education (CF-E) overlay from the underlaying Residential Low Density (RL) designation for the subdivision of approximately 8.82 net acres into 58 lots. The project includes the construction of 58 two (2) story single family residences as part of a planned "residential development. The Environmental Board feels that a Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate level of environmental review for this project. In addition to the areas of concern addressed in the ND, the Board feels that the following issues need to be addressed: Item 11 , Population-- The discussion states that the population for this area is expected to increase by approximately 156 people based on the Huntington Beach average of 2.7 inhabitants per household. The proposed 'homes are to be two (2) story single family homes, which are usually large, thus it would seem that more than 2.7 people would reside in each one. Perhaps a more realistic population increase and its potential impact on transportation and circulation should be evaluated. Item 18, Aesthetics--The discussion states that the two (2) story design is compatible with the surrounding residences. This statement is questionable in light of the fact that the surrounding homes are single story. Item 19, Recreation--Additional information is required to assess the adequacy of the "tentatively agreed to" off site park approvements at Greer Park. Mitigation Measures, Page 12--Is mitigation measure (4) a repetition error or was measure (4) to address a different topic? The Environmental Board recommends approval of ND 94-14 subject to resolution of the above issues. If you have any questions regarding our comments , please contact Norman Smith, ND Committee Chair. cc: Catherine Stip, Chair, Environmental Board Committee members Janet Burkland and Paul Mount Roy Richardson, Planning Commission FRANK _..,_� � • RADMACHER ASSOCIATES, INC. Landscape Architects May 23, 1995 GREER PARK - HUNTINGTON BEACH ESTIMATED COST" OF IMPROVEMENTS 1 . Lighting 16 post lights, hook-up, trenching, conduit, repair Allow SUB-TOTAL $ 25 ,000 . 00 2. Tot Lot - 92 ' Dia. a. Remove and replace sand (18" depth) 370 cu.yds. @ $50. 00 $ 18 ,500. 00 b. Rubberized surfacing 1,600 sq. ft. @ $10 . 00 $ 16 , 000 . 00 C. Dismantle and remove existing play equipment $ 1 ,500 . 00 d. 2 - #0205 "To-Fro" swings (4 seats) 2 units @ $1,500 .00 $ 3 ,000 . 00 e. #500-560A "Playmaker" Playworld System $ 30 , 500 . 00 f. #D-50X "Burke" Sand Digger $ 500 .00 g. #D-50XH Sand Digger (Handicap Accessibility) $ 500. 00 h. 4 Benches - #P2581 (8 ' Warms) 4 units @ $500 . 00 $ 2 ,000 . 00 SUB-TOTAL $ 72, 500 .00 14841 Yorba Street, Suite 204 • Tustin, CA 92680 • (714) 832-1774 FAX (714) 832-5721 3. Tot Lot - 60 ' Dia. a. Remove and replace sand (18" depth) 160 cu. yds @ $50 .00 $ 8 ,000 . 00 b. Rubberized surfacing 750 sq. ft. @ $10 . 00 $ 7,500 . 00 C. Dismantle and remove existing play equipment $ 1 ,500 . 00 d. "Spring Riders" 3 @ $675 . 00 $ 2,025 . 00 e. "Karavan" #1300 Sand Ship $ 10 ,800 . 00 f. "Karavan" #2700 Elephant Slide $ 2 , 800 . 00 g. ' "Karavan" #4500 Group See-Saw $ 3,700 .00 h. 4 Benches #P2581 (8 ' Warms) 4 units @ $500 . 00 $ 2 ,000. 00 SUB-TOTAL $ 38 ,325. 00 4. BASKETBALL COURT EXPANSION a. 4,050 sq.ft. conc. @ $3.00 $ 12, 150.00 b. Relocate 2 Olive trees @ $250.00 $ 500 . 00 C. Relocate picnic table and slab $ 750 . 00 d. Site preparation, .modify irrigation system $ 2,000 . 00 e. Replace existing basketball backboards (2) $ 250 . 00 SUB-TOTAL $ 15 ,650 .00 .. 1 5. DESIGN FEES (Landscape Architect, Electrical) Allow $ 7 ,500. 00 TOTAL 1-5 $158 ,975. 00 + 10% Contingency $ 15 , 898 .00 TOTAL ESTIMATE $174 , 873 . 00 r} RCA ROUTING SHEET INITIATING DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE NO. 94-4 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: I July 17, 1995 RCA ATTACHMENTS STATICS Ordinance (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Attached Resolution (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Not Applicable Tract Map, Location Map and/or other Exhibits Attached Contract/Agreement (w/exhibits if applicable) (Signed in full by the City Attome Not Applicable Subleases, Third Party Agreements, etc. (Appoved as to form by City Attome Not Applicable Certificates of Insurance (Approved by the City Attome Not Applicable Financial Impact Statement Unbud et, over$5,000 Not Applicable Bonds If applicable) Not Applicable Staff Report If applicable) Attached Commission, Board or Committee Report (If applicable) Attached Findings/Conditions for Approval and/or Denial Attached EXPLANATION FOR MISSING ATTACMENTS REVIEWED RETURNED.? !FQIR EC Administrative Staff Assistant City Administrator Initial City Administrator Initial City Clerk EXPLANATION FOR RET RKOF ITEM: (Below SpaceFor Only) r • 7 �S NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ' '°"0p0SC b W-2 n iha, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday, July 17, 1995, at 6:30 PM in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following planning and zoning items: ❑ 1. ZONE CHANGE NO. 94-4/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 94-14: Applicant - The Presley Companies Request: To permit the rezoning of the 8.82 net acre closed Gill School site from Public, Semi-Public (PS) to Residential Low Density (RL) for single family residential purposes. Location: 6800 Cumberland Drive (Southeast corner at Victoria Lane). Planner Assigned: Wayne Carvalho NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an initial environmental assessment for the above item was processed and completed in accordance with the California Quality Act. It was determined that Item# 1, with mitigation, would not have any significant environmental effect and that a mitigated negative declaration is warranted. The environmental assessment is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community Development Department, or by telephoning (714) 536-5271. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City Clerk's Office, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office after July 13, 1995. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning Division at (714) 536-5271 and refer to the above items. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 536-5227 (cclg0717) x CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST svBJECT: ZG JE C44AKE7t 00, �f�-- NEE�AS'rVw✓ D 7ra�J nl����-1 y DEPARTMENT: GoMA41AA1la PSVEt[OPNLF�J"MEETING DATE:JU[ ,Y /'7, (j�TS- if CONTACT: wIAY&fF- PHONE: N/A YES NO ( ) lam► ( .) Is the notice attached? ( ) 06 ( ) Do the Heading and Closing of Notice reflect City Council (and/or Redevelopment Agency)hearing? ( ) (s<f ( ) Are the date, day and time of the public hearing correct? ( ) ( ) If an appeal, is the appellant's name included in the notice? If Coastal Development Permit,does the notice include appeal language? Is there an Environmental Status to be approved by Council? ( ) ( ) Is a map attached for publication? ( ) ( ) Is a larger ad required? Size ( ) ( ( ) Is the verification statement attached indicating the source and accuracy of the mailing list? ( ) ( ) Are the applicant's name and address part of the mailing labels? ( ) ( ) Are the appellant's name and address part of the mailing labels? ( ) ( ) If Coastal Development Permit, is the Coastal Commission part of the mailing labels? ( ) ( ) If Coastal Development Permit, are the Resident labels attached? ( ) ( ) Is the33343 report attached? (Economic Development Dept. items only) Please complete the following: 1. Minimum days from publication to hearing date 2. Number of times to be published / 3. Number of days between publications NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING i BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday, July 17, 1995, at 6:30 PM in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following planning and zoning items: ❑ 1. ZONE CHANGE NO. 94-4/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 94-14: Applicant - The Presley Companies Request: To permit the rezoning of the 8.82 net acre closed Gill School site from Public, Semi-Public (PS) to Residential Low Density (RL) for single family residential purposes. Location: 6800 Cumberland Drive (Southeast corner at Victoria Lane). Planner Assigned: Wayne Carvalho NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an initial environmental assessment for the above item was processed and completed in accordance with the California Quality Act. It was determined that Item# 1, with mitigation, would not have any significant environmental effect and that a mitigated negative declaration is warranted. The environmental assessment is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community Development Department, or by telephoning (714) 536-5271. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City Clerk's Office, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office after July 13, 1995. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning Division at (714) 536-5271 and refer to the above items. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 536-5227 (cclg0717) Commonwealth Land Title Company 200 West Santa Ana Boulevard Santa Ana, California 92701 (714)835-8511 TITLE DEPARTMENT FAX NO. (714)835-0513 ® Commonwealth® Land Title Insurance Company THE PRESLEY COMPANIES 19 CORPORATE PLAZA DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH, CA Attn: SCOTT MINAMI Your Ref: VARIANCE REPORT PER YOUR REQUEST Our No: 699820-J Title Officer: JIM PRASCH Dated as of MAY 2, 1995 Enclosures: VARIANCE REPORT, LABELS AND MAPS I� 200 West Santa Ana Blvd. Santa Ana, CA 92701 (714) 835-8511 Commonwealth Land Title Company To whom it may concern, I hereby certify that on �J the f llowi varience repoa prepared in accordance with the request from �'Qis Cc.n /4�� . I also certify that the following varience report was obtained through use of the current 1994-1995 Orange county Tax Assessor's Ownership Rolls. s vice Dept. - Dated Reliance Rdi.n,Group Hnldin¢.Co p.n� � � DATAQUICK INFORMATION NETWORK REPORT X. * X. � Orange X. Prepared for: THE PRESLEY CO. SCOTT MINAMI 19 CORPORATE PLAZA NEWPORT BEACH, CA Provided by: Commonwealth Land Title Account Rep: JIM PRASCH 200 West Santa Ana Blvd. #100 Prepared by: MICHELLE MURPHY Santa Ana, CA 92701 * Farms - 5 line : records 1 to 104 * * * � --- Search Criteria --- * * Parcel Number 14518106. . 14518110 , 14513121 . . 14513125 v14513208 , * * 14518301 . . 14513311 v14514102. . 14514111 v14514201 . . * X. 14514208 , 1451431 , 14514405. . 14514410 v14514419. . * * 14514424 , 14514433. . 14514435 , 14514501 . 14514503 v * * 14515209. . 14515210 , 14515334. . 14515335 , 145184 , 14518508.* * . 14510509 ,145223 , 14522404 , 14522408 , 14523222. . * X. 14523225 , 145234 v14524504. . 14524508 _ * X. * m X. X. X. * X. X. X. � X * X. * X. n X. * 104 matching properties were found Mon May 01 13: 15: 16 1995 * *w* The accuracy of this information is deemed reliable but not guaranteed *** The following report was processed using the above parameters and was provided by JIM PRASCH of Commonwealth Land Title � Page 1 ---------------- - - -----���------------------ � -~--------------~- --------- -- 1 Prcl : 145-131-06 Site:6902 CUMBERLAND DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:TITRIGA,GEORGE S Mail :6902 CUMBERLAND DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: (714)891-1097 Xmpt:Y Sale:$69vOOOF Date:01/18/78 Ln : Doc :125341058 Yb:1962 Sqft: 1 ,382 Asd:$88,872 Imp:65% Tract:03889 Blk: Lot:6 LotSz:9,660 Rms:6 Bed/Bath:4/2.0 Un : 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2 ) Prcl : 145-131-07 Site: 15252 YORKSHIRE LN*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:GLASER,DONALD J TR Mail :15252 YORKSHIRE LN*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: (714)892-6537 Xmpt:Y Sale:$Q Date:05/04/93 Ln: Doc : Yb: 1962 Sqft: 1v312 Asd:$188,38O Imp:29% Tract:03889 Blk: Lot:7 LotSz:7,200 Rms:6 Bed/Bath:4/2.0 Un : 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 3 ) Prcl : 145-131-08 Site: 15262 YORKSHIRE LN*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:DIVINSKIvEDWARD J Mail : 15262 YORKSHIRE LN*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: Xmpt:Y Sale: Date: Ln : Doc :23 Yb: 1962 Sqft: 1v640 Asd:$507254 Imp:60% Tract:03889 Blk: Lot:8 LotSz:7,200 Rms:7 Bed/Bath:3/2.0 Un : 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4 ) Prcl : 145-191-09 Site: 15272 YORKSHIRE LN*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Dwnr:SZE,LIN LAN Mail :4145 LINCOLN AVEnCULVER CITY CA 90232 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: (310)839-1380 Xmpt: Sale: Date: Ln: Doc : 131470011 Yb: 1962 Sqft: 1v294 Asd:$103,5% Imp:46% Tract:03789 Blk: Lot:28 LotSz:7,200 Rms:6 Bed/Bath:3/2.0 Un : 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5 ) Prcl : 145-131-10 Site:6901 DRESDEN CIR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:NEWTON,GTANLEY E Mail :6861 SKYVIEW DRiHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: (714)893-5813 Xmpt: 5ale:$42,50OF Date:09/19/74 Ln : Doc :112460624 Yb: 1962 Sqft: 1v294 Asd:$45,775 Imp:57% Tract:03789 Blk: Lot:29 LotSz:8,880 Rms:6 Bed/Bath:3/2.0 Un : 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 6 ) Prcl : 145-131-21 Site:6902 DRESDEN CIR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:JIANG,FON TR Mail :1911 ALSUNA LNwHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: (714)536-7879 Xmpt: Sale: Date:04/30/87 Ln: Doc:241910 Yb: 1962 Sqft: 1 ,274 Asd:$114,094 Imp:57% Tract:03789 Blk: Lot:40 LotSz: Rms:6 Bed/Bath:3/2.0 Un : 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 7 ) Prcl : 145-131-22 Site:15312 YORKSHIRE LN*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Dwnr:HAYvFRANCES M Mail : 15312 YORKSHIRE LN*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: Xmpt:Y Sale: Date:00/00/86 Ln: Doc :594338 yb: 1962 Sqft:2,684 Asd:$81 ,652 Imp:75% Tract:03789 Blk: Lot:41 LotSz:7,200 Rms:9 Bed/Bath:5/3.0 Un: 1 ------------------------------------------------------~----------------------- 8 ) Prcl : 145-191-23 Site:15332 YORKSHIRE LN*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Dunr:HAHN,JACQUELEWE & JOH Mail : 15332 YORKSHIRE LN*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: Xmpt: Sale:$29,OOOF Date: 12/08/71 Ln : Doc :99170501 Yb: 1962 Sqft: 1 ,312 Asd:$46,B40 Imp:57% Tract:03789 Blk: Lot:42 LotSz:7v200 Rms:6 Bed/Bath:4/2.0 Un : 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 9 > Prcl : 145-131-24 Site: 15342 YORKSHIRE LN*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:SASANO,CLARENCE M TR Mail : 15342 YORKSHIRE LNuHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: (714)897-5317 Xmpt:Y Sale: Date:01/05/87 Ln: Doc :3062 Yb: 1965 Sqft:2,388 Asd:$55;796 Imp:64% Tract:03789 Blk: Lot:43 LotSz: 10v878 Rms:7 Bed/Bath:4/3.0 Un : 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1O ) Prcl : 145-131-25 Site:6901 BRUNSWICK DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:HEIEM,WILLIAM H TR Mail :6901 BRUNSWICK DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: (714)893-4960 Xmpt:Y Sale: Date:03/02/70 Ln : Doc : 15966 Yb: 1962 Sqft: 1v312 Asd:$46,524 Imp:58% Tract:03789 Blk: Lot:44 LotSz: Rms:6 Bed/Bath:4/2.0 Un: 1 ----------------_---------------------------------------------------------_--- Copyright (c ) 1995 Dataquick Information Network Page 2 ------------------------ ----------------------- 11 ) Prcl : 145-132-08 Site:6900 BRUNSWICK DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:CITY OF HUNTINGTON BE Mail :CITY HALL*HUNTINGTN BCH CA 92646 Use:MISCELLANEOUS Ph: Xmpt: Sale: Date: Ln: Doc :23 Yb: Sqft: Asd:$515,052 Imp:14% Tract: Blk: 11 Lot: 15 LotSz:7.00 A Rms: Bed/Bath: Un: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 12 ) Prcl : 145-133-01 Site: 15251 YORKSHIRE LN*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:CHVDJKArVLASTIMIL Mail :15251 YORKSHIRE LN*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: (714)893-1939 %mpt:Y Sale:$7,000F Date: 10/17/69 Ln: Doc:91100314 Yb: 1962 Sqft:1v208 Asd:$47v104 Imp:58% Tract:03889 Blk: Lot: 10 LotSz:7r000 Rms:6 Bed/Bath:3/2.0 Un : 1 ------------------------------------------------------ '----------------------- 13 ) Prcl : 145-133-02 Site: 15261 YORKSHIRE LN*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:BRACKETT,ALFRED N & M Mail : 15261 YORKSHIRE LN*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: Xmpt! Sale:$233,000F Date: 10/31/91 Ln:$209v700 Doc :597281 Yb: 1962 Sqft:19375 Asd:$205,000 Imp:26% Tract:03889 Blk: Lot:9 LotSz:6,600 Rms:6 Bed/Bath:3/2.0 Un : 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 14 > Prcl : 145-133-03 Site: 15271 YORKSHIRE LN*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:JDHNSON,DAVID A Mail :4921 LOS PATOS DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: Xmpt: Sale:$27x500P Date:07/20/81 Ln: Doc : 141470135 Yb: 1162 Sqft: 1v274 Asd:$140,639 Imp:44% Tract:03789 Blk: Lot:27 LotSz: Rms:6 Bed/Bath:3/2.0 Un : 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 15 ) Prcl : 145-133-04 Site: 15291 YORKSHIRE LN*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:KAYD,GEORGE Mail :15291 YORKSHIRE LN*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: Xmpt:Y Sale:$5vOOOF Date:05/19/69 Ln: Doc :89600639 Yb: 1962 Sqft:1 ;312 Asd:$46,627 Imp:57% Tract:03789 Blk: Lot:26 LotSz: Rms:6 Bed/Bath:4/2.0 Un : 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 16 ) Prcl : 145-133-05 Site: 15301 YORKSHIRE LN*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:ARGON,MITCHELL J & MA Mail : 15301 YORKSHIRE LN*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: (714)893-7634 Xmpt: Sale:$237,000F Date:04y22/91 Ln:$213,300 Doc: 187046 Yb: 1962 Sqft: 1v294 Asd:$199,740 Imp:29% ' Tract:03789 Blk: Lot:25 LotSz: Rms:6 Bed/Bath:3/2.0 Un : 1 -------------------------------------------------------M---------------------- 17 ) Prcl : 145-133-06 Site: 15311 YORKSHIRE LN*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92847 Ownr:MARTIN;GLENN W Mail : 15311 YORKSHIRE LN*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: (714)897-3720 Xmpt:Y Sale:$219,000F Date:09/14/93 Ln: Doc:616500 Yb:1962 Sqft:1 ,584 Asd:$219,000 Imp:30% Tract:03789 Blk: Lot:24 LotSz: Rms:6 Bed/Bath:3/2.0 Un : 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1B ) Prcl : 145-133-07 Site: 15331 YORKSHIRE LN*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Dwnr:ARMSTRONG,PETER P & D Mail :PO BOX 941*LUCERNE VALLEY CA 92356 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: Xmpt: Sale:$38x500P Date: 10/26/79 Ln: Doc : 133710010 Yb: 1962 Sqft: 1,375 Asd:$113v658 Imp:46% Tract:O3789 Blk: Lot:23 LotSz: Rms:6 Bed/Bath:3/2.0 Un : 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 19 ) Prcl : 145-133-08 Site: 15341 YORKSHIRE LN*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:HAIR,WILFRID TR Mail : 15341 YORKSHIRE LN*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: Xmpt:Y Sale:$230,OOOF Date:02/06/92 Ln: Doc :74451 Yb: 1962 Sqft:1 ,692 Asd:$609911 Imp:61% Tract:03789 Blk: Lot:22 LotSz: Rms:6 Bed/Bath:3/2.0 Un : 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 20 ) Prcl : 145-133-09 Site: 15351 YORKSHIRE LN*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:TDRRES,MANUEL G & CYN Mail : 15351 YORKSHIRE LNMUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAMoES Ph: (714)847-5118 Xmpt: Sale: Date:04/05/89 Ln: Doc : 176533 Yb: 1962 Sqft: 1 ,294 Asd:$66v185 Imp:53% Tract:03789 Blk: Lot:21 LotSz: Rms:6 Bed/Bath:3/2.0 Un : 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Copyright (c ) 1995 Dataquick Information Network � Page 3 � ~^____'__-___-----------------�mr---------------------_---�n�'------------------- 21 ) Prcl : 145-133-10 Site: 15361 YORKSHIRE LN*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:CUSHENBERRY,PAUL E Mail : 15361 YORKSHIRE LN*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: %mpt:Y Sale:$257,50OF Date:08/25/89 Ln :$206,000 Doc :454156 Yb: 1962 Sqft: 11274 Asd:$209v903 Imp:32% Tract:03789 Blk: Lot:20 LotSz:6v600 Rms:6 Bed/Bath:3/2.0 Un : 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 22 ) Prcl : 145-133-11 Site: 15371 YORKSHIRE LN*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:RAYMOND~LOUIS R Mail :5312 CDRNELL AVE*WESTMINSTER CA 92683 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: (714)892-6267 Xmpt: Sale:$71,50OF Date:09/02/77 Ln: Doc :123641565 Yb: 1962 Sqft: 1 ,312 Asd:$67,949 Imp:54% Tract:03789 Blk: Lot: 19 LotSz:7,000 Rms:6 Bed/Bath:4/2.0 Un : 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 23 ) Prcl : 145-141-02 Site:6851 MELBOURNE DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:MORSEvMARK S Mail :6851 MELBOURNE DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: (714)847-0940 %mpt:Y Sale: Date:07/28/92 Ln:$181 ,500 Doc :504323 Yb: 1962 Sqft:11274 Asd:$209v069 Imp:29% Tract:03789 Blk: Lot: 18 LotGz:8,360 Rms:6 Bed/Bath:3/2.0 Un: 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 24 ) Prcl : 145-141-03 Site:6841 MELBOURNE DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:POBLETE,JUSTITO L Mail :6841 MELBOURNE DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: %mpt: Sale:$195,000F Date:03/08/94 Ln:$156v000 Doc :162553 Yb:1962 Sqft:1v294 Asd:$199,000 Imp:27% Tract:03789 Blk: Lot:17 LotSz:8,300 Rms:6 Bed/Bath:3/2.0 Un:1 � -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 25 > Prcl : 145-141-04 Site:6831 MELBOURNE DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:CARBAJALvMANUEL Mail : 19371 BAYWATER LN*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: Xmpt: Sa7e:$41 ,OOOF Date:04/21/75 Ln: Doc : 113820405 Yb: 1962 Sqft: 1 ,312 Asd:$54, 148 Imp:55% Tract:03789 Blk: Lot: 16 LotSz:8,240 Rms:6 Bed/Bath:4/2.0 Un : 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 26 ) Prcl : 145-141-05 Site:6811 MELBOURNE DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:RUDD,PETER M Mail :6811 MELBOURNE DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: %mpt:Y Sa7e:$145,OOOF Date:07/09/86 Ln :$115,600 Doc :293148 Yb: 1962 Sqft: 1v332 Asd:$1669211 Imp:34% Tract:03789 Blk: Lot: 15 LotSz:7,900 Rms:6 Bed/Bath:3/2.0 Un : 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 27 ) Prcl : 145-141-06 Site:6801 MELBOURNE DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:SROKAvLADISLAUS R F Mail :6801 MELBOURNE DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: (714)897-2204 %mpt:Y Sale: Date: Ln: Doc :23 Yb: 1962 Sqft: 1 ,272 Asd:$46,630 Imp:58% Tract:03890 Blk: Lot:6 LotSz:8,000 Rms:6 Bed/Bath:3/2.0 Un: 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 28 ) Prcl : 145-141-07 Site:6791 MELBOURNE DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:KQTSYBAR,ALBERT E Mail :6791 MELBOURNE DRxHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: (714)897-5711 Xmpt:Y Sale: Date: Ln: Doc :23 Yb: 1962 Sqft: 17375 Asd:$48,496 Imp:60% Tract:03890 Blk: Lot:5 LotSz: Rms:6 BedyBath:3/2.0 Un : 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 29 ) Prcl : 145-141-O8 Site:6781 MELBOURNE DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:GIESLER,CHERYL M Mail :6781 MELBOURNE DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: %mpt:Y Sale: Date:05/14/92 Ln:$95v000 Doc :322264 Yb: 1962 Sqft: 1 ,274 Asd:$45;988 Imp:58% Tract:03890 Blk: Lot:4 LotSz: Rms:6 Bed/Bath:3/2.0 Un : 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 3O ) Prcl : 145-141-09 Site:6761 MELBOURNE DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:GALLO,JOSEPH S I LAUR Mail :6761 MELBOURNE DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: Xmpt:Y Sale:$135,OOOF Date:07/21/86 Ln:$121v500 Doc :314516 Yb: 1962 Sqft: 1,375 Asd:$155,068 Imp:37% Tract:03890 Blk: Lot:3 LotSz: Rms:6 Bed/Bath:3/2.0 Un : 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Copyright (c ) 1995 Dataquick Information Network Page 4 _ .._....._.:- _ .... -_......_......._.._._._._...._._._..._.._._.._.. ._ __----------------- - ----oil_..-_._.._.__...-_._._.._._.._._._._.._._._ 81 ) Pr•c:1 :145--1.41.-10 Si•te:6751 MELBOURNE DRxHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr•:SMITH,LOUISE TR Mai.1 16751 MELBOURNE DRxI••UNTT.NGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Phi: XmE:It: Sale:$109000F Date:06/24/68 Ln: Doc :589829 Yb: 1962 Sqf t.:1 ,678 Asd:$48,604 I:mp:60% -T'r••ar..•t.:08890 Blk.: Lot:2 LotS : Rms:7 Bed/Bath:3/2.0 Un : 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ':2 ) Prc:1 :145-141.-•11. Site:6741. MELBOURNE DRxHUNTINGT'ON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr•:WI:I_L.IAMS,GRAHAM & JUL Mail :6741 MELBOURNE DRxHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: (714)897-1 74 Xmpt:Y Sale: Date:00/00/87 Ln: Doc : 1228a5 Yb: 1962 Sqf t: 1 ,274 Asd:$167,70; I:mp: ::% 'T'ract:03890 Blk.: Lot: 1. L.otS%:7,000 Isms:6 Br:.d/Bath:3/200 Un: 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ) Pr•c l : 145_ 14 ._01 Site: :1.5241 VICTORIA 1_NxHUNT'INGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr•:MATSUMOTO,NAf'tUHI:TO Mail : 1.5241 VICTORIA L.N*HUNTI:NGT'ON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: (71.4)898••••5594 Xmp t.:Y Sale:$226,000F Date: 12/80/91. L..ns$1.80,800 Doc. :71.8198 ' Yb: 1962 Sgft: 1. ,812 Asdc$200,000 Imp:27% T-r•act:03890 Bl k.: Lot:46 L.otS : Rm<:s:6 Berl/Bathe8/2.0 Un i l -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 34 ) Pr•r..1 :145-142-02 Sitec 15251. VICTORIA LNNHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr•:EIGE'NMANN,LUTS A w PA Mail : 15251 VICTORIA LNxHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGL.E FAM RES Ph: Xmpt: Sale:$212,000F Date:O :/10/94 Ln:$201. ,300 Doc :172232 Yb: 1962 Sqf t: 1 ,274 Asd:$67,522 I:mp:54%. Tract:03890 Bl k: Lot:45 L.otf:z". f ms:6 Bed/Bath:3/2..0 Un : i. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 35 ) Pr•cl : 145-142•-03 Site11.5271. VICTORIA LNNHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:l•(AAE,JON S Mail : 15271 VICTORIA L..NxH1. NTI:NGT'ON BEACH CA 92647 Use:S INGL.E FAM RES Ph: (714)894-: 924 Xmpt:Y Sale:$2:_:,OOO Date:08/21/64 L.n: Doc :71890029 Yb: 1962 Sqf t: 1 ,715 Asd:'$57,292 I:mp:66Z Tract:03890 Blk.: Lot:44 LotS:::: Rms:7 Bed/Bath:3/200 Un : i ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 86 ) Pr•cl : 145-.142•-04 Si.te: 1.5281. VICTORIA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:MEDNIC1(,EDWARD Mail : 15201. VICTORIA LNxHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: (714)897._. 767 Xmpt: Sal e:$Q Date:08/25/94 Ln: Doc : Yb: 1962 Sgft: 1.,274 Asd9$1:c:5,618 I:mp:45% Tr'act2O3890 Blk.: Lot:43 LotSz: lams:6 Bed/Bath:3/2..0 Un : 1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 87 ) Pr•cl : 145--142•-•05 Site: 15291. VICTORIA LNNHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr•:PATAIL.,RUBY Mail : 15291 VICTORIA L..N*HUNTINGT'ON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: Xntpt: Sale:$81. ,000F Date:03/31/79 I_.n : Doc : 1. OB90`.';04 Yb: 1962 Sqf t: 1. ,272 Asd:`>;1.08, 134 .T.mp:46% Tract:0 B90 Blk.: Lot.:42 LotSz: Rm!s:6 Bed/Bath:3/2.,0 Un : 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8 ) Pr•c 1 : 145••••142-••06 Sit e: 15811. VICTORIA LNNHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:KATAPODIS,JAMES & MAR Mail : 15811. VICTORIA LNxHUNTINGT-ON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: Xmpt: Sale:$200,0001- Date:07/27/94 L.n:$180,000 Doc:474545 Yb: 1962 Sgft: 1 ,274 Asd:$45,987 Imp:58% Tract:03890 B1 k.: Lot:41 LotS : Rms:6 Bed/Bath:3/2..0 Un: i. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 89 ) Pr•cl : 145-142•-•07 Si.te: 15321. VICTORIA I_N HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr•:L.I ,RICHARD C Mail : 15622 DAWSON L.N*HUNTI:NGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SIN(:iLE FAM RES Ph: Xmpt: Sale:$247,50OF Date:08/08/89 I_n:$1.00,000 Doc :419570 Yb: 1962 Sqf t: 1. ,954 Asd:$240,499 Imp:27% Tr•act:03890 Blk.: I_ot:40 LotS :8,000 Rms:7 Bed/Bath::3/2..5 Un : 1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 40 ) Pr••cl : 145-14 ••••08 Site: 15 ,: 1 VICTORIA L..NXHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr•:YUEN,I_II•( HANG TR Mail : 15SSI VICTORIA LM*HUNT'INGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: Xmpt:Y Sale: Date:00/00/90 Ln : 'Clot.: : Yb: 1962 Sgft: 1 ,578 Asd:$146,45-. Imp:49% Tract:03890 Blk:: I_.ot:39 LotSz:7,000 Rms:7 Bed/Bat.h:4/3 0 Un : 1. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Copyri ght (c ) 1995 Dataqui.c:k. Information Network. Page 5 ....._......_..-. .......................�_.._......_.�___._._......_....�_.._.._._.__._._..........._.__....- _._._._._.._._.-.........--.._..__.-_..__.-.. 41 ) Pr••c l : 1.45-�144�-•05 Site: i.`�4�'.1. ;:iAl_.ISBURY L.NxHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92 647 Ownr:C:OC:HRAN,KENNETH S Mail : 1.5421 SAL.ISIURY LN*HUNT'INGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Phi: (714)897-6:: 61 Xmpt:Y Sale: Date". L.n: Doc !2: Yb: 1962 Sgft: 1 ,272 Asri:$47,750 Imp:59% Tract:03709 Blk.: I._ot: 1.2 LotSz.:8,000 Rms:6 Berl/Bath:3/2.0 Un : 1. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 42 ) Prcl : 145--144-06 Site: 15401 SAL.ISY:sURY I_.NxHUNTINGTGN BEACH CA 9 647 Ownr:CHADD,DGNALD & SUSAN Mail : 15401 SAL.ISBURY LNxHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: (71.4)897•-•54 9 Xmpt: Sale: Date:02/09/95 Ln: Doc :2 Yb:1962 Sgf t: 1. ,274 Asd:$45,987 I:mp:58% Tr•act:037B9 Blk.: L.ot: 1 : LotSz:8, 160 Rms:6 Bed/Bath::/2 00 Un: 1 48 ) Pr•c:l : 145-144-•07 Si.te: 15391 SALISBURY LNxHUN'T'INGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr•:BRANTLE::Y,JAMES A & El_ Mail :15391 SALI.SBURY L_N*HUNT'INGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: (714)891•-3098 Xmpt:Y Sale:$30,50OF Date:03/1.5/79 Ln: Doc : 130690087 Yb: 1962 Sgft.: 1 ,294 Asdz$103,212 I:mp:46 Tract:03789 Blk: I._ot: 1.4 LotSz:8,814 Rms:6 Bed/Bath:3/2..0 Un : 1. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 44 ) Pr•c l : 145••••144•-08 Site! 15`:c92 NORWICH CIRMHUNTI.NGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:£.HAFFEE,PAUL_ & DONNA Mail : 1.5392 NORWICH CT.RwHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: (714)894•-.6001. Xmpt: Sale:$208,OOOF Date:07/02/93 I_.n:$182,700 Doc :445526 Yb:1962 Sgf t:1 ,274 Asd:$205,000 Imp:26% Tract:03890 Blk: Lot:7 Lot.•z:7,000 Rms:6 Bed/Bath:3/200 UnQ 45 ) Prcl : 145-•144•-•09 Site: 15402 NORWICH CIRxHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr IFORTIER,ROGER A & L.IS Ma:i 1115402 NORWICH CI:R*HUNT'I:NGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: (714)897•-8943 Xmpt:Y Sale:$1.27,000F Dat.e: 10/31./84 Ln c$114,800 Doc :448656 Yb'1962 Sqf t 11. ,272 Asd:$149, B2 I:mp:42% Tr•act:03890 Blk.: Lot:8 LotSz:7,566 Rms:6 Bed/Bath:3/2 0 Un : 1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 46 ) Prc l : 145•-144-•10 Si.te: 15422 NORWICH CI:R*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr :WAZEWSKI,RONALD M & J Mail :15422 NORWICH CIRxHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: (714)893-8767 Xmpt:Y Sale: Date: 12/29/93 L.n: Doc : Yb: 1962 Sgft:1. ,274 Asd:$98965 o Imp:36% Tr•act:03890 Blk: Lot:9 LotSz:7,469 Rms:6 Beni/Lath:4/2.0 Un: I -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 47 ) Prc1 : 145-144-••19 Site: 15421 NORWIC:H ClR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:VI.L.L.ASENOR, I SABE:.LL.E B Mai.l :513 DAHLIA AVF_.xCORONA DEL MAR CA 92625 Use:S ING1._E FAM RES Ph: Xmpt.: Sa 1 e:$1.8: ,000E Date:01./27/88 L.n:$1.46,400 [:roc:37670 Yb: 1962 Sqf t: 1 ,272 Asd:$206,085 Imp:28% Tr•ar..t:03890 Blk.: Lot: 18 I_.o•tS :8,000 Rms:6 Bed/Bath:3/2.0 Un: i --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 48 ) Pr•c l : 145-144-•20 S:i.t.e: 15401. NORWICH CIRxHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:BOOKER,M D Mail :15401 NORWICH CIRxF•IUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: (714)892•-•5801. Xmpt c Sale:$2 40,000F Date:07/1 /90 Ln:$216,000 Doc:869881. Yb: 1962 Sqf t: 1. ,274 Asd:$200,000 Imp:28% 'T'ract:03890 Blk: Lot.:19 LotSz:8,000 Rms:6 Bed/Batth:3/2..0 Un : 1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 49 ) Prcl : 145-•144-21 Site: 15391. NORWICH CIRxHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr ICL.ARK,EVERETT M Mai.l : 15 :91 NORWICH CIRxHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: Xmpt:Y Sale:$29,OOOF Date:03/24/72 L.n: Doc : 100500362 Yb: 1962 Sqf t:1 ,B2 Asd:$49, 1.87 I:mp:60/ Tract.:0 :890 Blk: Lot:20 LotSa.:8,000 Rms:6 Bed/Bath:3/2.0 Un : 1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 50 ) Prc1 : 145---1.44•••22 Sit.e: 1.5892 VICTORIA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr':GE:IGEL..,ROBERT A ° L.I.N Mail ! 15392 VICTORIA LNxl-UNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:Slhl£a"1_.E FAM RES Ph: (714)892•-•4158 Xmpt: Sale:$125,000F Dat.e:01/29/85 L.n :$1.12,450 Dac::3251.1 Yb!1962 Sgft: 1 ,274 Asds$174,5 6 Imp;49% Tract:08890 Blk.: Lot:21. LotSzc7,000 Rms:6 Bed/Bath:8/240 Un : l. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Copyright (c: ) 1905 Dataquick. Information Network. 40 i0i Page 6 51. ) Prc l : 145-•1.44-•28 Site: 1;402 VICTOf:IA I...i;iiNTT.NGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:BENNETT,JAME:S L Mail : 15402 VICTORIA LN*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: (714)894-56'�9 Xmpt:Y Sale:$25,OOOF Date:05/12/69 Ln: Doc:89530389 Yb: 1962 Sqf t:1,294 Asd g$45,616 Imp:57% Tract:03890 Bl k: Lot:22 LotSz:8,000 Rms:6 Beni/Bath:3/2.0 Un : t ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 ) Pr•cl : 145-•144-24 Site: 15422 VICTORIA I._NxHUNTINGTGN BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:HARRIS,DAVID C & MARI Mail : 15422 VICTORIA LNxHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Phi: Xmpt:Y Sale:$22,500P Date:09/27/84 Ln: Doc:402982 Yb: 1962 Sgft: 1.9274 Asd:$1.48, 186 Imp:40% Tract:03890 Blk: L.ot:23 I_.otSz:800 Funs:6 Fred/Bath:3/2,.0 Un: 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- .`.'3 ) Prcl C145-1.44-_8 Si.te: 15421 VICTORIA =HUNTI:NGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:DOUGLAS,FREDRICK H Mail : 15421. VICTORIA L.NXHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use!SINGLE FAM FEES Ph: (71.4)B98-•0628 Xmpt:Y Sale: Date: Ln: Doc:2 Yb: 1962 Sgft: 1 ,274 Asd:$46,040 Imp:58% Tract:05890 B1k.: Lot: 2 LotS4.: Rms:6 Bed/Bath:3/2..0 Un: 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 54 ) Prc.1 : 1.45-144•-84 Site: 1 5401 VICTORIA I_NXHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:fiPEER,AARON REID Mail : 15401 VICTORIA I_NXHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SIhICiLE FAM RES Ph: (714)894--3288 Xmpt:Y Sale: Irate:00/00/89 Ln : Doc : Yb:1.962 Sqf t: 1 ,272 Asd:$45,507 Imp:57% Tract:03890 Bl k.: Lot::33 I_.otS : Rms:6 Bed/Bat.h:3/2.0 Un : 1. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 55 ) Prc l : 1.45•--144- Site: 15891. VICTORIA LNNHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:t(UO,SHEN YEH ° F(UHWA Mail : 15391 VICTORIA LNxHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SI.NGL.E FAM [YES Phi: (714)892•-•4445 Xmpt:Y Sale:$70,500P Date:01/07/83 I._n:$57,900 Doc. :1.1.041. Yb: 1962 Sqf t:1.,519 Ass:$193,558 I:mp:59% Tract:03890 Bl k.: Lot:34 L..otS :7,000 Rms:6 Bed/Bath:3/200 Un : 1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- J6 ) Pr c I S 1 45-145-•01. Site:15 392 SAL.ISBURY L.NxHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:HANSCOM,ANDRE:W G Mai.l :15 92 SAL.ISBURY LNxHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: Xmpt: Sale:$216,000F Date: 12/04/92 Ln:$1.94,400 Doc:B33495 Yb: 1962 Sqf t:1 ,272 Asd:$200,000 Imp:2 6% Tract:0' 789 Blk.: I_ot: 1. LotSz:7,000 Rms:6 Bed/Baths:3/2 .0 Un : 1. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 57 ) Prc l : 145....1 52-•09 Site:6691 MEL..BOURNE DRxHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:I:iE REMER,JOSEPH GEORG Mail :6691 ME:LBOURNE DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: (714)892--25:59 Xmp t:Y Sale: Date:08/27/91 Ln: Doc: Yb: 1962 Sqf t: 1 ,S75 Asd%$46,365 Imp:50% Tract:03892 Bl k.: L.ot: 16 LotSz: Rms:7 Bed/Bath:4/2 s 0 Un : 1. 58 ) T=rc.l : 145-152-10 Si.t.e:6701 MELBOURNE DRxHUNTT.NGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:MARTON,JE:AN RYDER TR Mail :6701 MEL..BOURNE DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92 647 Use:SINGl._E: FAM RES Ph: Xmpt:Y Sale:$72,000F Date:09/30/77 Ln: Doc: : 123981435 Yb:1.962 Self t: 1 ,294 Asd z$67,200 Imp:54% Tract:03892 Blk.: Lot: 1.5 L.atSz: Rms:6 Bed/Bath:3/2.0 Un: 1. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 59 ) Prcl 11.45•-1`3-84 Site: 15402 F LORENCE CITr'HUNT'INGT'ON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:MESSINA,JANICE: LA RE:E: Mail : 15402 FL..ORENCE. CWHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGL.E: FAM RES Ph: Xmpt:Y Sales$21.7,0001= Bate:08/01/91 Ln :$162,750 Doc :9224 : Yb: 1962 Sqf t: 1 ,274 Asd z$?_00,340 Imp:28% Tract:03892 Bl k.: L.ot:2 L.otS : Rms:6 Berl/Bath:8/2,.0 Un : 1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 60 ) Frcl : 1.45-•158-•85 Site: 1.5892 FLORENCE CIF,xHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:COYLE,JOHN W Mail : 15?92 FL_ORENCE CIR HUNTINGT'ON BEACH CA 92647 Use:S.T.NGLE FAM RES Ph: Xmpt:Y Sa'l e:$;:5,500 Date:03/05/76 Ln". Doc :116660450 Yb: 1962 Sqf t: i. ,544 Asrl:$64,223 Imp:51 % Tract:0 892 Bl k.: i_.ct: t L.otS :7,000 I ms:6 Ber..1/Beth:3/2.0 Un : 1. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- C:opyr•i ght (c. ) 1995 Dataquick. Information Network. _._..._.__._:.._...._....._.._._._......_..._._...._._.._._.._._.__.._.__... .______._.._._...... _ .._..._....._.__....._.._.._......_._..._._._. . Page -_._.._-.--_._..-__-3-._.7_..-. 61. ) Pr-c 1 : 14'�--184-_.01. BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:GATHE,GLORIA Mai.l : 15242 NOTTINGHAM LNwHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SIhI(:lLE: FAM ICES Ph: Xmpt: Sale: Date:09/1.7/86 Ln:$91,000 Doc :428400 Yb: 1962 Sqf t: 1 ,272 Asd:$45,7`2 Imp:58% T'r-act:0::3894 Blk.: I_.ot:9 L.otS : Rms:6 Bed/Bath:3/ .0 Un : 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 62 ) Pr-cl :145--1.84---0 Si•te: 15 52 NOTTINGHAM LN*HUNT'INGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr-:WRIGHT,SCOTT KE:NNETH Mai.l : 15252 NOTTINGHAM LNxHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: (71.4)842---9891 Xmpt: Sale:$230,000F Dat.e:03/31/93 I_.n :`G1.84,000 Dor_ :209978 Yb:1966 Sgft: 1 ,694 Asri:$2::30,000 Tmp:29% Tr-ac.t:08B94 B1 k: Lot: 10 LotSv: Isms: Bed/Bath: Un : 1. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6 ) Pr-cl : 1.45---184•--0 ; Site: 15272 NOTTINGHAM L.NwHUNT'INGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr-:OTTO,JAME:S R Mail : 1+.-I..52 WILD PLUM CIR HUNT:I:NGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SIN6LE FAM RES Ph: (714)894-.-8735 Xmpt: Sale:$65,OOOF Irate:0=::/07/77 Ln: Doc 11209401.86 Yb:1962 Sqf t: 1 ,875 Asd s$67,999 I.mp:55% Tr act:0 :893 B1 k.: Lot,: 15 LotSr: Rms:7 Berl/Bath:4/2.0 Un : i. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 64 ) Pr-c l : 145---184--04 Site: 15202 NOTTINGHAM =HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr-:LICATA,JO SEPH V Mai.l : 1`282 NOTTINGHAM L..N*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Uses SINGLE FAM RES Ph: Xmpt: Sale:$199,000 Date:O :/03/95 L.n:$179,100 Doc :87111 YbQ962 Sgft: 1. , ;12 Asd:$1997968 Imp:26% Tr•ac•t.:0389 Blk: Lot.: 14 I._otSz: Rms:6 Berl/Bath:4/2.0 Un : 1. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 65 ) Pr••cl : 145-184----0 5 Site: 1.5 92 NOTTINGHAM L_NxF-UNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr-:SHIMKO,DE:NNIS G & L.AU Mail : 15292 NOTTINGHAM LN*HUNTTNGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGL..E FAM RES Ph: (714)897-4184 Xmpt: Sale:$160,OOOF Date: 10/02/87 I_n:$120,000 Doc :556010 Yb: 1962 Sr_I•Ft:1 ,274 Asd:$191. , 1.43 Imp:34% T'r•act:03893 B1k.: Lo•t:1 Lot.Sz: Rms:6 Bed/Bath:3/ .0 Un: 1. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 66 ) Pr-cl : 145--184--•06 Site: 15 312 NOTTINGHAM L.NNHUNTINGT'ON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr-:MAL..TSBERGER,GREGOI Y J Mail : 15812 NOTTINGHAM L.N*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:S I NGL.E FAM RES Ph: Xmpt:Y Sale:S 143,000E Date:04/29/06 L.n:`l;1.06,500 Doc : 169429 YbQ96 f. gft: 1 , :75 Asia:`h170,418 Imp:42% Tr-act:03893 Bl k.: I_o•t.: 12 L..otSw: Rms:7 Bed/Bath:4/2.0 Un Q --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 67 ) Pr-cl : 145---184--07 Site: 15322 NOTTINGHAM LNxHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr-:HAMMAC:K,JAMES I BARBA Mai.1115322 NOTTINGHAM L.N*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:S INGL..E: FAM RES Ph= (71.4)895-•••8046 Xmp•t 1 Y Sa 1 e:$9,00UF Date:04/ 0/70 Ln: Doc : 146678 Yb: 1962 .- gft: 17696 Asd:$170,294 I.mp:42 Tr-<: ct:03893 Blk.: L.ot: 11 LotSz." Rms:8 Bed/Bath:3/2.0 Un : 1. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 68 ) Pr-c1 : 145--184--08 Site: 15332 NOTTINGHAM L.NxF-UNTINGTON BEACH CA 9 647 OWnr-:MAGGA,NORMA Mai.1 : 15::32 NOTTINGHAM LNxHUNTINGrON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGI_.E: FAM RES Ph: (714)892---3901 Xmpt.:Y Sale:$14,50OF Date:09/16/05 Ln: Doc: 115120310 Yb: 1962 Sgft: 1 ,274 Asd:$57,872 Imp:56% Tr-act:03893 Bl k: L_ot: 10 LotS :7,000 Rms:6 Beni/Bath:3/2.0 Un Q -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 69 ) Pr•-c 1 : 145--185---08 Site26692 HALIFAX I:tRNHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:SC.:UKANE:C,STE PHEW N JAME Mail :669,E HALIFAX DT-wHUNT INGT'ON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE.:. FAM RES Ph: (71.4)898--.-7124 Xmp•t:Y Sale:$186,OOOF Date: 12/16/87 L..nc$167,400 Doc. :695 91. Yb: 1962 Sgf%: 1 ,703 Asdz$ 09,464 Imp:82% Tr-act:03B9=: Blk: L_ot:8 I_otSi:7,000 Rms:7 Bed/Bath:3/2.0 Un : 1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 70 ) Pr••cl : 1.45--185---09 Si•te:6702 HALIFAX DkxHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr-:FRANDSEN,DE:AN L. Mail :6702 HALIFAX DR*HUNTINGTCIN I:sE".AC:H CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: (71.4)897--8044 Xmpt/:Y Sale: Date: L.n D . oc .2-'3 Yb: 1962 `•���_I.1-'t.1. ,274 Ass n$45,455 I mp:57% Tr-ac t c 08898 B l k: L.ot:9 LotSz:7,000 pms:6 Bed/Bath:8/2 .0 Un: 1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Copyr••ight. (01.995 Dataqu:i.c:k. Information Network. Pa .........._.........._.....-.---_-.....-_......--..-._.._.._.-_._._- .-.-_......_--..._.._.............-_--_.....------._.. ..--.-.---.......-.-...--------.... 71. ) Prcl : 145- 228-01 Site:681.2 CANTERBURY DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 9 647 Ownr:LAKSBERGER,LILI Mail :6812 CANTERBURY DRxHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE: FAM RES Ph: (714)893...31.::::3 Xmpt:Y Sale:$37,500P Date: 12/30/87 Ln : Doc :715927 Yb: 1962 Sqft: 1 ,272 Asd:$Ial,924 Imp:40% Tract:03890 Bl k.: Lot:61 LotSz:7,200 Rms:6 Bed/Bath:3/2.0 UnQ 1. 72 ) Prr.l :1.4`.a--228-0a Site:6802 CANTERBURY DRMHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:OWE_N S,JOHN Mail :6802 CANTERBURY DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGL.E: FAM RES Ph: (714)893-1182 Xmpt: Sale:$Q Date:06/09/94 Ln'. Doc: :23, Yb: 1962 Sqf t:2,050 Asd:$68,579 Imp:72 Tract:03890 Blk.: Lot:62 LotS :7,000 Rms:7 Bed/Bat.h:4/2.0 Un : 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 73 ) Pr•cl : 145-223--03 Si.te:6792 CANTERBURY DRxHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:MIE R,DAVID S Mail :6172 GL.E:NE:AGL.ES CIR*HUNTI:NGTON BEACH CA 92648 Use:SINGLE: FAM RES Ph: (714)969•-•1767 Xmpt: Sale:$245,5OOF Dat.e:09/06/89 Ln:$1.87,000 Doc:477002 Yb Q 962 Sqf t:1,375 Asd c`1;205 7 418 Imp:29% 'react:O3B90 Blk.: Lot:63 LotS :7,000 Rms:6 Berl/Bath:3/2.0 Un: 1. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 74 ) Prcl : 145..-22 :-04 Site16782 CANTERBURY DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:TYL.ER,PAT'RICIA A Mail :6782 CANTERBURY DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Phi: Xmpt:Y Sale: Datte: 11/23/82 Ln : Doc :492912 Yb: 1962 Sgft: 1 ,274 Asd:` IS4,003 I.mp:48% Tract.:03890 Blk: Lot:64 L.o'tS'zu7,000 Rms:6 Bed/Ba't.h:3/2.0 UnQ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 75 ) Pr•c1 : 1.45••-228-05 Site:6772 CANTERBURY DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:SL.AUGHTER,MAYME. J Mail :6772 CANTERBURY DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGL.E FAM RES Ph: (714)897-6025 Xmpt:Y Sale: Date: Ln". Doc :23 Yb:1962 Sgf't:19532 Asd:$49,667 Imp:61.f Tract.:03890 DID: Lot.:65 I._catSz:7,000 Rms:7 Beni/Bath:4/2.0 Un : 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 76 ) Prc l : 145--223-06 Site:6762 CANTERBURY DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:NEL SON,BAYARD R TR Mail :6762 CANTERBURY DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE. FAM RES Fh: (714)89:3-.5377 Xmpt:Y Sale: Dat.e:00/00/89 Ln: Doc : Yb: 1962 Sqf t: 1. ,274 Asd:;>;46,578 Imp:`8 Tract:03890 Blk.: L.ot:66 Lot S :7,000 Rms:6 Bed/Bath:3/2.0 UnQ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 77 ) Prcl : 145-••22 -07 Si.te:6742 CANTERBURY MHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr•:BRENT,DENNIS M & DE:NI Mail :6742 CANTERBURY DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGL.E FAM RES Ph: (71.4)897•-•4671 Xmpt:Y Sale:$155,00OF Date: 10/24/86 Ln:$124,000 Doc:504:.398 Yb: 1962 Sgft: 1 ,424 Asd:$178.,044 Imp:34y Tract,:0::3890 Dlk.: Lot.:67 LotSz:7,000 Rms:6 Bed/Bath:3/2.0 Un : 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 78 ) Prcl : 145••••22 ::-08 Site:6741 CUMBER LAND DRNHT. NTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr1POWEL.L,FL0YD G Mail sPO BOX 1.284*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE: FAM RES Ph: Xmpt:Y Sale:$70,50OF Date: 12/1.6/77 Ln". Doc: 124950700 Yb:1962 Sqf t:1 ,274 Asd:$68,427 :I:mp:55% Trac:t:03890 Blk.: Lot:54 L.otSz:7,000 Rms:6 Bed/Bath:3/2.0 Un : 1 79 ) Pr•c l : 14'5-••223-09 Site:6761. CUMBERL.AND DRxHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 OWnr:HOANG,NICOL.E. THUY Mail :6761. CI. MBERLAND DRNHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGL.E FAM RES Ph: . Xmpt:Y Sale:$240,000F Date:08/31/93 L.n :$192,000 Doc :589599 Yb:1962 Sgft:2,103 Asd:$240,000 Imp:31.X Tract:0 890 Bl k.: Lot:55 LotSz:7,470 Rms:8 Berl/Bath:::3/2.0 Un : 1 BO ) I•-•'rcl : 145••-223•-10 Site!6771 C:UMBERL.AND DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:AN1:REASEQ DONAL.D A Mail 16771. C:UI'BERL.AND DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE: FAM RES Phc (71.4)89::::.-.9568 Xmpt:Y Sale: Date: Ln : Doc :.'?:=, Yb: 1962 Sgf•t: 1. ,991 Asd:$55, 103 Imp:65% Tract:03890 Blk.: Lot.:56 LotSz:7,::360 Rms:7 Bed/Bath:3/2.0 Un: 1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Copyr•i.h t (c ) 1.995 Datarlu i.ck. Information Network. � Page 9 l ^----�----------------------���-------------------------c--------------------- 81 ) Prcl : 145-223-11 Site:6781 CUMBERLAND DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:BECK,TIMOTHY DANIEL K Mbil :6781 CUMBERLAND DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: (714)895-1460 Xmpt:Y Sale:$175,000F Date:06/27/88 Ln :$155v000 Doc :304127 Yb: 1962 Sgft: 1v274 Asd:$193,213 . Imp:30% Tract:03890 Blk: Lot:57 LotSz:7,000 Rms:6 Bed/Bath:3/2.0 Un : 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 82 ) Prcl :145-223-12 Site:6791 CUMBERLAND DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:HENRYvDENNIS J K MELI Mail :6791 CUMBERLAND DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: Xmpt: Sale:$208,50OF Date: 11/28/94 Ln :$211 ,535 Doc :681881 Yb: 1962 Sqft: 1,272 Asd:$45,507 Imp:57% Tract:03890 Blk: Lot:58 LotSz:7,600 Rms:6 Bed/Bath:3/2.0 Un : 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Q3 ) Prcl : 145-223-13 Site:68O1 CUMBERLAND DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:DAVIS,LARI B Mail :6801 CUMBERLAND DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: %mpt:Y Sale:$31v50OF Date:04/17/73 Ln: Doc : 106470703 Yb:1962 Sqft: 1 ,274 Asd:$46v468 Imp:58% Tract:03890 Blk: Lot:59 LotSz: Rms:6 Bed/8ath:3/2.0 Un : 1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 84 ) Prcl : 145-223-14 Site:6811 CUMBERLAND DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:BEAULIEUvKEN Mail :PO BOX 1601*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: Xmpt: Sale:$110,50OF Date:08/25/80 Ln: Doc : 137131893 Yb: 1962 Sqft: 19695 Asd:$141 ,210 Imp:45% Tract:03890 Blk: Lot:60 LotSz:7,000 Rms:7 Bed/Bath:3/2.0 Un : 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 85 ) Prcl : 145-224-04 Site: 15181 VICTORIA LN*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:HAZELGRENvPAUL B & SO Mail : 15181 VICTORIA LN*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: Xmpt: Sale:$225,000F Date: 12/30/93 Ln:$202,500 Doc:914549 Yb: 1962 Sqft:1 ,375 Asd:$205v000 Imp:27% Tract:03890 Blk: Lot:51 LotSz: Rms:7 Bed/Bath:4/2.0 Un : 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------n-- 86 > Prcl :145-224-08 Site: 15231 VICTORIA LN*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:CARTER,WILDA TR Mail :15231 VICTORIA LN*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: (714)897-9070 Xmpt:Y Sale:$16,OOOF Date: 10/15/74 Ln: Doc : 134144 Yb: 1962 Sqft: 1 ,274 Asd:$46,468 Imp:58% Tract:03890 Blk: Lot:47 LotSz: Rms:6 Bed/Bath:3/2.0 Un : 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 87 } Prcl : 145-232-22 Site: 15202 YORKSHIRE LN*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:MILLERxJAMES A Mail :15202 YORKSHIRE LN*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: (714)894-2755 Xmpt:Y Sale:$28,000 Date:O3/29/76 Ln : Doc : 116861256 Yb: 1962 Sqft: 1v274 Asd:$63,581 Imp:50% Tract:03889 Blk: Lot:30 LotSz:7,200 Rms:6 Bed/Bath:3/2.0 Un : 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 88 ) Prcl : 145-232-23 Site: 15212 YORKSHIRE LN*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:MIER,DAVID S Mail :6172 GLENEAGLES CIR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: (714)969-1767 Xmpt: Sale:$135,0OOF Date:09/10/88 Ln :$101 ,250 Doc :410312 Yb: 1962 Sqft: 1 ,312 Asd:$155,068 Imp:37% Tract:03889 Blk: Lot: 16 LotSz:7,200 Rms:6 Bed/Bath:4/2.0 Un: 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 89 > Prcl : 145-232-24 Site:15222 YORKSHIRE LN*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:HROVATvJOSEPH TR Mail :16382 MAGELLAN LWHUNTINGTDN BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: (714)847-7082 Xmpt: Sale: Date:00/00/92 Ln : Doc: Yb: 1962 Sqft: 1 ,295 Asd:$62,355 Imp:49% Tract:03889 Blk: Lot: 17 LotSz:7,200 Rms:6 Bed/Bath:3/2.0 Un : 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 9O ) Prcl : 145-232-25 Site:6901 CUMBERLAND DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:HANSONvPAUL E K KATHR Mail :6901 CUMBERLAND DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: (714)892-1080 %mpt:Y Sale:$155,000F Date:09/25/86 Ln :$139,500 Doc :446550 Yb: 1962 Sqft:1 ,272 Asd:$178;042 Imp:37% Tract:03889 Blk: Lot: 18 LotSz: Rms:6 Bed/Bath:3/2.0 Un : 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Copyright (c ) 1995 Dataquick Information Network • Page 10 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 91. ) Prcl :1.45--•-294-01 Site:6822 CANTERBURY DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 9 647 Ownr:NAUM,MARTHA J Mail :6822 CANTERBURY DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: Xmpt: Sale: Date:04/14/92 Ln". Doc : Yb: 1962 Cigft: 1 ,321 Asd:$190,881. Imp:29% Tract:03889 Blk.: L.ot: 4 L.otSz: 13,200 Rms:6 Bed/Bath:4/2.0 Un: i -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 92 ) Pr-c l : 145---2 ,4--02 Site=32 CANTERBURY DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ounr-:BOHNE:,DUANNE H Mai1 16882 CANTERBURY DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92 647 Use:SINGLE: FAM RES Ph s (714)B97•-•9148 Xmpt 1 Y Sale: Date:09/2: /75 Ln : Doc: 1.151 B051.2 Yb: 1961. Sqf t: 1. ,272 Asd:$58,032 Imp:56% Tract:03889 Blk.: Lot: :=: Lot Sz: 10,088 Rms:6 Bed/Bath:3/1 .5 Un : 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9-:: ) F'r-cl : 145-234••••08 Site:6842 CANTERBURY DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr-:RYME::R,MICHAEL W & MIC Mail :6842 CANTERBURY DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA . 92647 UsesSINGLE FAM RES Ph: Xmpt:Y Sale:$205,000F Date:08/11/93 Ln :$1.84,500 Doc.:536968 Yb: 1962 Sqf t: 1 ,274 Asd:$200,000 I:mp:27% Tract:03889 Blk.: Lot:32 LotS :7,000 Rms:6 Beni/Ba•th:3/2e0 Un : 1. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 94 ) Prc I N 145---294-04 Si.te: 15201 YORKSHIRE L.NxHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr-:RIDING,WILLIAM V Mai.1 : 1.5201. YORKSHIRE L.N*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE IMAM RES Ph: (714)897--9081 Xmpt:Y Sale:$25,50O Date:08/27/70 Ln : Doc. :93870304 Yb:1962 Sgft:1 ,312 Asd:$47,158 Imp:58% Tract:03889 Blk.: Lot: 1 L.otSz:7,000 Rms:6 Bed/Bath:4/2n0 Un: 1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 95 ) Pr-c1 : 1.45-234-••05 Site: 15211. YORKSHIRE LNxl-•IT. NTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr•:MURRAY,GL.ENDA J Mai.1 : 16561 YUCCA C:IRxFOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 9270E1 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: Xmpt: Sale:$140,50O Date:02/25/87 Ln:$1.1.2,400 Doc : 102949 Yb: 1962 Sgft.: 1,295 Asd:$161. , 86 I.mf• :34% Tract:03889 Bl k.: Lot: 15 LotSM:6,500 Rms:6 Bed/Bath• :3/2..0 Un Q --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 96 ) F'r-cl : 145-284-06 Site: 15221 YORKSHIRE LN*HUNTINGTCIN BEACH CA 92647 CJwnr-:BERRY,MI.CHAEI_ & JO AN Mail : 15221. YORKSHIRE L.NxI-UNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE. FAM RES Ph: Xmpt:Y Sale: Date:07/19/89 Ln." Doc : Yb:1.962 Self t:1. ,375 Asd:$68, 11.6 Imp:70 Tract:03889 Bl k: L.o•t: 14 L-otSz:7,000 Rms:7 Bed/Bath:4/2..0 Uri a 1. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 97 ) F'r-c l : 145----234-07 Site:6841 C UMBEf{LAND DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA ' 92647 Ownr:WAGE:RS,SCOTT ° CANDY Mai.1 :6841. CUMBERLAND DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Us:>e:SINGL.E FAM RES Ph: Xmpt:Y Sale:$228,OOO Date: 11./16/93 Ln:$216,600 Doc :787487 YbQ962 Sgft: 1 ,312 Asd:$228,000 Imp:29% Tr-ac:t:03889 Bl k.: L.ot: 1 3 L.ot.Sz:7,000 Rms:6 Bed/Bat.h:4/2..0 Un Q -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 98 ) F'r••c l : 145--284--08 Site:6B81. CUMBERL.AND DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr•:TEMPL.E,RICHARD S & CA Mai1 :61331. CUMBERL..ANI:i DRxHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGL.E FAM RES F'h: (714)892--6824 Xmpt.:Y Sale:$23,000P Dat e:04/27/84 Ln: Doc:: 178624 Yb: 1962 Sgft: 1 ,272 Asd:$149,.317 Imp:40% Tr•-act:03889 Bl k: Lot: 12 LotS' : Rms:6 Bed/Bath:3/2.0 Un : i. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 99 ) Pr•cl : 145-••234-•09 Site:6821. CUMBERL.AND DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:,.JACOBS,DARYLE D Mail :6821 CUMBE:RL.AND DR*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: (714)89725475 Xmpt:Y - Sale: Date:00/00/92 Ln : Doc ." Yb! 1962 Sgft: 1. ,274 Asd:$50,201 Imp:61% Tract:08889 Bl k: WWII I I Lot.Sz: Rms:6 Berl/Bath:3/2..0 Un : i -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.00 ) Pr-cl : 145- 245-•04 Si•t.e! 15182 NOTTINGHAM LN*HT.INTINGTCIN BEACH CA 92647 Ownr-:BROUHLE,ROBERT P ° CA Mail ' 15945 MCCORD C:I.FtixF-OUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 Use:SINGLE FAM RES F'h: (714)5 1---5764 Xmpt: Sale:$235,0001 Date:05/09/90 L.n:$1.64,500 Doc :249132 Yb: 1962 Sqf t: 1 ,274 Asd:S200,000 Imp:29% Tr-r; c t:03894 I l k.: Lot.:4 L.otS : Rms:6 Bed/Batth:: /2 a 0 Un : l -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Copyr:ight (01995 Dataqui.ck. Information Network. _ Page -3e 11. 1.01. ) I•=r•cl : 145-•245••••05 Sitell5202 NC)'TTINGIIAM I_.Nxl-IUNT:I:NGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr cROLLEF'SE::N,GUNNAR TR Mail : 15202 NOTTINGHAM LNxHUNTINGTON :BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGL..E FAM RES Ph c (714)894•-•2706 Xmpt:Y Sa 1 e:$24,`GOOF Date:01/24/67 L.n: Doc:492627 YK 1962 Sqf t:1.,274 Asd K45,507 I m p:57% Tr•ac.t:03894 B1k.: Lot:` I._otSz: Rms:6 Beni/Rath: :/2.0 Un : 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.02 ) Pr c I C 145••••245-••06 Site: 1521.2 NOTTINGHAM LNxHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr:ROBIN S,JAMES W Mail : 15212 NOTTINGHAM LN*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 9 647 Use:SINGL.E FAM RES Phi: Xmpt:Y Sale:$:=3,000F Date:04/24/72 Ln: Doc: :1.00940841 Yb: 1.962 Sq t:1 ,295 Asd:` 50,0^Ci Imp:61.% Tr•act:03894 Bl k.: Lot:6 I_.otSM: Rms:6 Beni/Bath:3/2.0 Un Q --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10:: ) Pr•cl : 14C- 245-•O7 Site: 15222 NOTTINGHAM LN*HUNTINGTON REACH CA 92647 Ownr:WESTLEY,1•(EVIN R & SUS Mail : l5222 NOTTINGHAM LN*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGL..E FAM RES Ph: (71.4)090-•6277 Xmpt:Y Sale:$127,000F Uate: 12/30/82 i._n:$101,600 Doc : 1059 Yb: 1962 Sgft: 1. 9274 Asd:$157,512 Imp:48% Tract:03894 Blk.: Lot:7 L..otSz: Rms:6 Rer_•I/Ratth:3/2.0 Un : 1. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.04 ) Pr•cl : 145••••245-08 Si.tecI5282 NOTTINGHAM LNKHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Ownr•:GOODAL.L,ROBERT WAYNE Mail :15= NOTTINGHAM LNxHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Use:SINGLE FAM RES Ph: Xmpt:Y Sale:$206,OOOF Date:0;/05/92 L.n:$195,700 Doc : 149536 Yb: 1962 Snf t: 1 ,375 Asd:$206,00O Imp:26% Tract:03894 Rlk.: I_.ot:8 LotSz". hms:7 Red/Rath:4/2.0 Un: 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Copyr•i ght (c ) 1995 Da•taqui.ck. Information Network. POR. S. 112, NE. 114, SEC 15, T.5S., R. HW 145- 13 142 -40 /11=/00, L o GOLDEN WEST STREET in m o 7R4CT- TRACT �; ° h' P Ov 15 Ap' # I6 v ^ ® 3o I so ARZ3' / 34 6 49.2o' 88.23' 35 42I45 ia8 ' ro II a 12 10 j M1 Ou 14 c , O N 17 O t9 j /.04 AC. /.09 AC. ` Z do `^ 9.08' 2 33 ie.i ' 60 9E8 36 48 j io 3 32 io ioB Q � Q J t�3 13 19 W I S O 6 87" Z54' 264 ' /So' 3 47 30 7 ao V 4 3/ 3846 M O5 II ® O N Q 5 30 39.45 - A 0 y� GREER PARK W V/CDO @CZtj 4 3 Nioe' 6 29 ' (C ioB' 44 jog' h 2' 7 8 $- 72' 72 4/ 42 93 7z t 6 % AC. 40' _ V 7O c O8 ° 60' 60• D 14 � � 90 >z' 72 YORKSHIRE e ¢ LANE z2'..ss' ri Q Ga 3 $ o N .3889 N 3v �' . 3789 C 7a' /0 9 Z7 26 25 24 23 22 2/ 20 /9 70• to r 60 MARCH 1962 14 - TR. NO. 3789 M. M. 138 - .34, 35 NOTE - ASSESSOR'S BLOCK a ASSESSOR'S MAP TR. NO. 3889 M. M. I38- 4I, 42 PARCEL NUMBERS BOOK 145 PAGE 13 /, SHOWN IN CIRCLES COUNTY OF ORANGE C D— l 1 � y =7--7 145- 14 f -13 / _/oo (^ 62O rRACr �a / 2 j 3 4 s s 7 '°' TRACT /B 2 3 O e Q ❑ �, DAWSON Pr) W O 3: �D �a 60' Q N LANE , 1 O — /7 Q SAL/SBURY LANE 16 5 /4 /3 /2 // l0 9 N 4789 LOT 75 N 6 ( /3 � B /O GILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL O� 17 �q �9 // /2 Gs s •,' ° 0 I� o O 10 II I2 O3 14 B. B2 AC � a2•�� `�C.ry V N $ N I 4 O a5 S NORW/CH 'I CIRCLE 8 a h z t �t 21 ? O 19 18 17 m 10 ° 20 /9 /B /7 /6 /5 /4 cs' V '70' 2/ 22 23 24 25 26 27 . / Z ® $ 23 O 25 O e 27 ro 28 42' 140' L� slv YfO28 V/C70R/A LANE42 37O ' O O O 2 O O O $ O .na 3835��y�{ 37 sJV J 46 45 44 43 42 4/ 40 39 7C 6 l O 3O 34 33 3 3/ 30 �� 40' MARCH 1962 6O' ,° W 5 TR. N0. 3789 M. M. /38- 34, 35 NOTE - ASSESSOR'S BLOCK & ASSESSOR'S MAP O TR. NO. 3890 M. M. /44-/6, 17 PARCEL NUMBERS BOOK K5 PAGE 14 SHOWN IN CIRCLES COUNTY OF ORANGE POR SW.//4, SW.//4, NE//4, SEC 15, T.55, R. //W. 145 - 1 5 18 60' 00 37 4z �� 70' S 58 57 5655 54 53 70 O 36 35 20 /9 /8 /7 3 /6 f�i7] /5 cT d CYYIIll W �' w ? 0 0 38o W $ - (/� N ') 63' 63' GL' GG•2I' 70' 60 60' Y CITADELS MELBOURNE DR/V OR/VE � T 8Oo 9O c 10 I I 12 13 0 52 Yi ioo' 39 34 io o' ioa' 2/ /4 ioo' ioo' / aS JLti 41 p o Ll \d.e 60 GL' 6/ .363 i8 6 IS l9 O O 27 23 V 5/ 4033 V 22 I3 O �l 2 / _/00 23 /2 16 5O 10 19 ® 33 50 4/ 32 3 49 4231 — �I 17 O4 II 18 ® q_Ltj ,O 21 24 // 2, 79 AC 48 43 30 2510 5 % IB ; 0 12 3 O 6p io Q 47 Z 44 29 ro..r' ^ 9.ee' 26 9 ....z^ � gee' 6 16 ioo' ioo' eo.27• F ble.z3' Ba.27' "' eo.z3' 46 4528 278 7 e 42I fo0 O � y "N ..3892 iES• mr3' i0t , iz2' iz5 i.' iE6' p (SUGAR AVENUE) N MC FADDEN o o `� AVENUE MARCH /962 41 TR. NO. 3892 M. M. 147--41, 42 NOTE - ASSESSOR'S BLOCK & ASSESSOR'S MAP PARCEL NUMBERS BOOK 145 PAGE 15 O SHOWN IN CIRCLES COUNTY OF ORANGE 1 145- 18 _ 24 CORNELL _ p ROME CIRCLE 'o DRIVE zoo 69 3B ivv zOo 35 /2 'oo !60' io 9.N .0 O 16 •0 60 O O 10 p BC-yo, 63' G3' 62' 65. 27' �• 19 I TRACTI I6 V6B37 W 36 // Lu /0 ro TR� NO.O4 70' 76 74 73 72 7/ 70 7a' 67 1B _� 2 /6 95 (q 59 6061 6263 64 65 O3 14 3O 14 33 66 29 117 /q B�' . 4 13 = 4 G3" 13 Z RUTGERS SORENTO CIRCLE /3 CIRCLE q y!7 63 63' 62' as.24' 5/ 50 3/ 24 /9 /2 /�� r /00' z• 1. 49 32 y 2320 = // 70' 58 7o' 57 56 5654 53 52 70 0 4/ 42 43 4445 46 47 O t9 O l0 3 O 10 O r141 Q 28 o O U 25 O 23 o O Q zoo• 4B 33 'Oo Ai .ao' 22 2/ '00' .00 /0/0 60 O n O Co 7DHAL/FAX 62 65.24 B ROW CIRCLE OR/VE 71, 63' 6d' G2' G.B.2/' 70' 60 •• •• •• •• 60' � a (D ° (D )6 1 70' 40 3 3B 37 36 35 34 N 3893 42 ��33ZZ 70 60' 2 3 4 5 6 7 B g MARCH/962 15 TR. NO. 3893 M. M. /50- 12, /3 NOTE - ASSESSOR'S BLOCK & ASSESSOR'S MAP TR. NO. 3894 M. M. I5/ -48,49 PARCEL NUMBERS BOOK K5 PAGE 18 O SHOWN IN CIRCLES COUNTY OF ORANGE 145 - 22 T ems" as' 35 34 33 32 3/ G9.93 30 29 i I T Acr , ; 23 a 4o 9 H 29 N O m 31 O O 34 � O m O ,rye iz. , h 40j4 �i io• 60' 39.•!T312 N 8 SUSSEX CIRCLE ' 28 W A J 32.E .^ moo• .. io' ® � , 11 �N j 27 ao Goo q i a• io ino' ioo ieo N 28 h 27 a 26 O 24 O-o 22 26 o TRACT o 0 6/ so 0 e b O s j lO 14 g jl I� (;`el 14 37 rsoe 38 39 40 4/ 42 43 50 49 4947 4645 44 25 /0 7 73 ,O 62 59 Q ro 15 I6 u 17 18 19 O o 21 O 51 2O 13 2O 13 24 /l 6 72 358 N 1a. -�7 60' „ 60' 41 O O 12 3O 12 I`l i �1 SEVILLA CIRCLE 23 /2 t` i o �� io' ,• co• 3 7/ 64 57 22 /3 4 70 1 6556 Q 14 13 0 12 I i 10 O9 0 8O Q 43 O 10 m 5OL �I 10 O ct 2/ /4 3 69 Q 6 55 bs' S/ rs.oi'52 53 5455 56 57 >o' C ill �010 64 63 62 6160 59 58 Q $ O 47 O O ioo' io o' ioa' ioo' m O o O O O O O o O 20 / 2 68 V 1;67 ,54 ®' L mo IXSI u VICTORIA r.�, LANE a 2 F � � 0 � 2 6 � � ° 0 / �. a � g2 4 � s � ° k N0389I �3 Lcr fJ No. 90 4o I6869l 53 52 5/ 50 48 48 47 7e.os' 6 66 6 70 7/ 70' O O >o aa' MARCH 1962 18117 so' 21 loo 24 TR. NO. 3891 M. M. 146- 8, 9 NOTE - ASSESSOR'S BLOCK B ASSESSOR'S MAP CDTR. NO. 3890 M. M. 144 - 16, 17 PARCEL NUMBERS BOOK 145 PAGE 22 SHOWN IN CIRCLES COUNTY OF ORANGE • I rl y POR. N.E. //4, N. E //4, SEC. /5, T. 55.) W. 142- -, ,,_ /00- 145- 23 o h GOLDEN WEST — STREET $ - h r /33' �o,II3 a /427' /3 /33' /p,z3 d TRACT of m r2 �' O n "I p. 16 O v 8 30 At'^ 47 s8.26' 24 23 PA N 0 - ;� /o z/a' /08' 48 25 22 BB.2s' (V 16 h R 3 0 4 9 46 6B,zi'�. �o.i � z 11.1 m N 69 5045 /06 J /OB 26 2/ /oB (3 4o I s s' O V u 68 5144 27 20 PAR 267 /sa so' O O 12 19 27 21 1 7 N 5.974 AC. Q O 5243 28 /9 Q m P. M. 55 - 32 2 3 p0 Z a O6 10 V m 21 2 v O V L72' 53142 /oe' /oe' 29 /8 /ae' Lij- 66 40 4/ 72 72' 30 l6 / 7$O o O9 V 22 0 23 p 24 V re) 65 72, 72' N PAR m / 64 3 YORKSH/RE LANE g az/a' n c - I$ h to �P sane 72' Lu 636 //I 2I.3812'03.3GN' 56137 a IQS� O414T.o3' C2�9' ss,,955 39 38 e2.99' 15 /4 7o' 56 37 ' \�t 32 /3 /oa' Q 6/ u °j /00./7' /oo' � � .n� l03 lol Z SA 78' an' ae2' m /oo' v n 13 O O O � u S u 22 60 Q 57 36 33 /2 10 m Q 0 lol Q o Ia 0 3 Q Q u v NO. 889m 59 /oo' Go' /oo' 58135 /do, 60 /oa' 34 // /oo NOTE - ASSESSOR'S BLOCK 8 ASSESSOR'S MAP MARCH /962 TR. NO. 3889 M. M. /38 - 4/, 42 PARCEL NUMBERS BOOK 145 PAGE 23 PARCEL MAP M 55-32 SHOWN IN CIRCLES COUNTY OF ORANGE CD SOR MAKES 1#0 GUARANTEE AS TO ITS ACCURACY -- - NOR ASSUMES ANY L ABKJ TY FOR OTHER USE& I'f-� C`7 NOT TO BE REPW -*UCED.ALL MOHTS RE' 'ED. CCOPYRW.HT ORANGE COUNTY ASSESSO 21 az �z 77 T 70 78 79 80 8182 83 Pam' co ' 48 47 18 23 22 2/ O ' (6 O O O O O a O 2 iie O9 Y O \l O O O O O O 0 63' L.2' Ls. 37• >a• Lo' 6a' - c Lr Q °� OXFORD $ DRIVE ~ 63" 63Z. ' pi Q �' 16 r�- 30 46 io o' � iod 27 10 ii o' >° 76 °' 73 74 73 72 77 70 — I 63 64 65 66 E? 8 $ O 15 J S O 15 og Q $ 2 '^ 51145 28 /9 J O 2 �I $ O 19 18 17 16 0 15 3 14 3 14 O O O 52 44 29 /8 3 6B G3' L2• GS.33 53 43 30 /7 1 PARIS CIRCLE 40 13 Q 13 4 \\� i"- /oo ' 774 N • y' L9• L3' L3' L.s 3o .S N 12 = a 3/ /6 O a O a°` ©8 SJ 4/ 5 l 116 >o' 61 70 71 78 57 56 II W II s0 TRA T 78 7 � 8/ e2 ea � � 40 � 31 /s � �114 7 O 35 $ O B © O 31 O o O Z O 10 = O 33114 10 = O 113 RS 39 Z , 8 O $ 8 9 0 2 o O O COANELL 4i : - N0.3893 '` tD NO. A9/CL u° ROME CIRCLE v° 60 >oo• 3413 >.o• 6- MARCH /962 TR. NO. 3893 M. M. /50- /2, /3 NOTE - ASSESSOR'S BLOCK & ASSESSOR'S MAP M. NO. 3894 M. M. /5/-48, 49 PARCEL NUMBERS BOOK145 PAGE 24 SHOWN IN CIRCLES COUNTY OF ORANGE I PROOF OF PUBLICATION \� STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. County of Orange ) I am a Citizen of the United States and a PUBLIC NOTICE victoria Lane), Planner As resident of the County aforesaid; I am NOTICEOFPUBLIC signed Wayne Ca ERE N9jTICE IS HEREBY over the age of eighteen years and not a HEARING BEFORE Ca10 that an Initial envl- r THE CITY COUNCIL ronmental assessment for party to or interested In the below OF THE CITtfOF the above Rem was pro HUNTINGTON BEACH cessed and completed In of Re-Zoning accordance with the Call- entitled matter. I am a principal clerk Of or ClosedG111 the HUNTIhGTON BEACH INDEPENDENT a determined that Remo, I School Site) with any sign would not r NOTICE IS HEREBY have any significant ernl- GIVEN that on •Monday, ronmental effect and that a newspaper of general circulation, printed July 17, 1995, at 6:30 PM mitigated negative decla- in the City Council Cham- ration is warranted.The en. and published in the City of Huntington bers. 2000 Main street, vironmental assessment is Huntington Beach,the Clty on file at the City of Hun- Beach, County. of Orange, State of Council will hold a public tington Beach Community hearing on the following Development Department, California and that attached Notice is a planning andzoningItems: 2000 Main street, and Is / 1. ZONE CHANGE NO. available for public Inspeo true and and copy as was printed RATION NEGATIVE D: Ap- tact and comment by con- RATION NO. 94-14: Ap• tacting the Community De- and published in the Huntington Beach p"nies-The Presley Com- velopment Department or 6- panles Request: To permit I by telephoning (714) 536- the rezorrn of the 8.82 net 52 and Fountain Valley issues of said 'acre closed Gill School site ON FILE: A copy of the drom Public, Semi-Public proposed request Is on file newspaper to wit the issue(s) of: ;(Ps) to Residential Low In the city clerks office, Density(RL)for single fam- 2000 Main Street, HunUng- ly residential purposes.Lo• ton Beach, Callfornfa .cation. 8000 Cumberland 92648, for Inspection by (So utheast outheast comer at the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to Interested parties at the July 6, 1995 Ci„iyy 13 lesss. Office after ALL INTERESTED PER- SONS'are Invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit eA- -dence for or against the a plicatlon as outlined i , above.If you challenge the I declare, under penalty of perjury, that city Councils action In court, you may be limited the foregoing is true and correct. Ito raising only those Issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described In this notice,or In.written correspondence delivered to the City at,or Executed on July 6 1995 prior to,the public hearing. / If there any further ques- tions Costa Mesa California. bons please call the Plan- is ning Division at (714) 536, 5271 and refer to the above items. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Connie Brockway, City Clerk,City of Hun- tington Beach, 2000 Main Street,2nd Floor, Huntington Beach,Cal- Ifornla 92648 (714) 538.3227 Published Signature Be ch-Fo ntainHon Valey tln- dependent July 6,1995. 072-715 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH C?rO'PoSEV 'kF,-2tor+snC9 6P G/OSED 61// Schoo/ NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday, July 17, 1995, at 6:30 PM in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following planning and zoning items: ❑ 1. ZONE CHANGE NO. 94-4 /NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 94-14: Applicant - The Presley Companies Request: To permit the rezoning of the 8.82 net acre closed Gill School site from Public, Semi-Public (PS) to Residential Low Density (RL) for single family residential purposes. Location: 6800 Cumberland Drive (Southeast corner at Victoria Lane). Planner Assigned: Wayne Carvalho NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an initial environmental assessment for the above item was processed and completed in accordance with the California Quality Act. It was determined that Item # 1, with mitigation, would not have any significant environmental effect and that a mitigated negative declaration is warranted. The environmental assessment is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community Development Department, or by telephoning (714) 536-5271. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City Clerk's Office, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office after July 13, 1995. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning Division at (714) 536-5271 and refer to the above items. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 536-5227 (cclg0717) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ^ Lo S BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL O HE CITY OF HUN ON ACH ?r0'P0sF_'D -.£-Z0"1V% Gloss 6i// SCAQ0� Sd NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday, July 17, 1995, at 6:30 PM in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following planning and zoning items: ❑ 1. ZONE CHANGE NO. 94-4 /NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 94-14: Applicant - The Presley Companies Request: To permit the rezoning of the 8.82 net acre closed Gill School site from Public, Semi-Public (PS) to Residential Low Density (RL) for single family residential purposes. Location: 6800 Cumberland Drive (Southeast corner at Victoria Lane). Planner Assigned: Wayne Carvalho NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an initial environmental assessment for the above item was processed and completed in accordance with the California Quality Act. It was determined that Item# 1, with mitigation, would not have any significant environmental effect and that a mitigated negative declaration is warranted. The environmental assessment is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community Development Department, or by telephoning (714) 536-5271. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City Clerk's Office, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office after July 13, 1995. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning Division at (714) 536-5271 and refer to the above items. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 536-5227 (cclg0717) .�I i 9s PUBLIC HIRING NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST"B" f MAILING LABELS - 4/3/95 -7/ President 1 Huntington Harbor HOA 10 Edna Littlebury H.B. Chamber of Commerce P. O. Box 791 Golden St.Mob. Hm ers Leag. 2210 Main Street,Suite 200 Sunset ,CA 90742 11021 Ma a Ivd. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 n Grove,CA 92642 Judy Legan 2 Bill Lilly Pacific Coast Archaeological H.B./F.V. Board of Realtors HHHOA ARC Society,Inc. 8101 Slater Ave. 16835 Algo n St. #119 P.O. Box 109 Huntington Beach,CA 92647 Hu on Beach,CA 92649 Costa a,CA 92627 n:Jane Gothold ]President 3 William D. Holman I1 County of Orange/EMA migos De ica Pacific Coast Homes Michael M. Ru ir.O 3748 23 Corporate Plaza,Suite 250 P.O. 8 untington Beach,CA 92605 Newport Beach CA 92660-7912 anta Ana,CA 92702-4048 Charles Grant 4 Mr. Tom Zanic 12 Planning Department 19 Friends of the HB Wetlands Seacliff Partners Orange Count 21902 Kiowa Lane 520 Broadway Ste. 100 P. O. B 48 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Santa Monica,CA a Ana,CA 92702-4048 President 5 Pres.,H.B. Hist. Society 13 County of Orange/EMA Huntington Beach Tomorrow C/O Newland House Thomas Mathews 411 6th St. 19820 Beach P. O. Box 40 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Hu on Beach,CA 92648 Sa a,CA 92702-4048 Julie Vandermost 6 Chairperson 14 County of Orange/EMA BEne Historical Resources Bd. Bob Fisher,Dir. 9 �92714-6734 #100 Comm. Service P.O. Box 40 2000 t. Sa na,CA 92702-4048 Hu tington Beach,CA 92648 Richard Spicer 7 Council on Aging 15 Planning Dir. SCAG 1706 �ra ve. City of Costa Mesa est 7th, 12th Floor ton Beach,CA 92648 P. O. Bo Los Angeles,CA 90017 C esa,CA 92628-1200 E.T.I. Corral 100 8 Dominick Tomaino 16 Planning Dir. Mary Bell Seacliff Homeowners Asso City of Fountain 20292 ood Cir. 6812 Scenic Ba 10200 ve. ington Beach,CA 92646 Hunt in each,CA 92648 ntain Valley,CA 92708 Catherine Stipe,Environmental 9 Seacliff HOA 16 Planning Director Board Chairman Jeff Metzel City of Westminster 16391 Fairway Lane 1939 ady Harbor Circle 8200 Westm' lvd. ntington Beach CA 92648 West ' er,CA 92683 g:lables\phnlbls PUBLIC HOING NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST"B" MAILING LABELS - 4/3/95 Planning Director James Jones 30 OC County Harbors, Beach City of Seal Beach Ocean View Elementary and Parks Dept. 211 Ei School district P. O. Bo each, CA 90740 17200 Pinehurst Lane S Ana,CA 92702-4048 Huntington Beach CA 92647 CA Coastal Commission 4 Ron Frazier 31 Cheryle Browning Theresa Henry Westminster School District Meadowlark Area 245 W. way,Ste 380 14121 Cedarwood Avenue 16771 Roose ane ch,CA 90802 Westminster CA 92683 Hun ' on Beach,CA 92649 California Coastal Commission 24 Gary Burgner 32 Sally Graham South District Office HB Union High School Disrict Meadowlark Area 245 W. B ay No. 380 10251 Yorktown Avenue 5161 Geldi rcle each,CA 92802-4458 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 H on Beach,CA 92649 Robert Joseph 5 David Hagen 32 Caltrans District HB Union High School district Koll Company 37 2501 n St. 10251 Yorktown 2213 Main St uite 32 nta Ana, CA 92705 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Hu n Beach,CA 92648 Director 2 Huntington Beach Mall Local Solid Waste Enf.A Attn: Pat Rogers-La O.C. Health Car ncy 7777 Edi ve. #300 P.O. Bo ngton Beach CA 92647 a Ana, CA 92702 New Growth Coordinator 27 CSA 33 Huntington Beach Post Office 730 El Camino Way#200 6771 Warner Ave. Tustin,CA 9680 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Marc Ecker 28 Goldenwest College 3 Fountain Valley Attn: Fred Owens Elementary School District 15744 Golde St. 17210 Oak Street Hu n Beach CA 92647 Fountain Valley CA 92708 Dr. Duane Dishno 29 Country View Estates HOA HB City Elementary School Dist. L6642 rrie Thomas PO Box 71 Tro rive Huntington Beach, CA 92626 ington Beach CA 92648 Jerry Buchanan 29 Country View Estates H HB City Elementary School Dist. Gerry Chapm 20451 Craimer Lane 6742 Circle Huntington Beach,CA 92648 ntington Beach CA 92648 g:1ab1es\phn1b1s 1:Donnie Glaser Fax:7144924637 Voice:7144924637 • .To:Scott Mlnaml at:Prelsey Corp Page 2 of 6 Thursday,June 29,1996 9:42:29 AM • Marguerite Argersinger Doug&Kathleen Armstrong Scott&Kathie Atwood 15031 Genoa 15211 Victoria 6901 Dresden Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Wes&Ginny Baylor Mae Benjamine Bill&Ruth Bra=ney 15081 Eton 6571 Paris 6621 Oxford Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Thomas&Mrs. Brown Robert Burdick Margaret Burke 6811 Oxford 15081 Sussex 15032 Eton Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Ronald&Patricia Campbell Frank&Kim Carano Chuck&Laurel Carr 15471 Norwich 15142 Nottingham 15211 Newcastle Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Chester&Janina Chyra Everett&Wanda Clark Mel&Mary Clark 6791 Canterbury 15391 Norwich 6561 Halifax Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach.CA 92647 Nat Clark Tawnia Cobb Joan Crosby 15142 Hanover 6671 Melbourne 15182 Hanover Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Paul Cushenberry Thomas&Jackie Dickey Stu Dinh 15361 Yorkshire 6501 Paris 6942 Dresden Huntinton Beach.CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 James&Joanne Denos James&Mary Dobrenen Richard&Susan Dodd 15002 Sevilla 6642 Alexandria 15082 Genoa Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach.CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Harriett&Fred Douglas Claire Englehardt Lorraine Faber 15421 Victoria 15321 Newcastle 15271 Nottingham Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach.CA 92647 Joel&Harriet Feldman Marjie Ferguson Carmen&Julian Rivera Fernandez 15311 Newcastle 6961 Dresden 6531 Alexandria Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 From:Donnie:51aser Fax:714a92E537 Voice:714a92b537 • To:Scott Minami at:Prelsey Corp • Pape 3 of 6 Thursday,June 29.1995 9:43:12 AM Frank&Madeline Ferraiolo Roger&Lisa Fortier Mary Furukawa 15032 Sevilla 15402 Norwich 6532 Halifax Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Birendar Gill Donald&Janice Glaser Sy&Ruth Grassman 15032 Victoria 15252 Yorkshire 15072 Sevilla Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Robert&Issa Graves Col.&Vicki Grove Ralph&Sherry Gullion 6941 Cumberland 15462 Capri 6501 Oxford Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 James&Beatrice Hageman Bill&Margaret Hair Andrew Hanscom 15222 Newcastle 15341 Yorkshire 15392 Salisbury Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Paul&Kathy Hanson Doren&Barbara Hastings Eldon&Seville Huffaker 6901 Cumberland 6561 Paris 15242 Hanover Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Jon&Ruth Kaae Jim& Mary Katapodis Katsuji&Yasuyo Kawakubo 15271 Victoria 15311 Victoria 15012 Genoa Huntinton Beach.CA 92647 Huntinton Beach.CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Robert&Shirley King Ken Kisthardt Jeff&Karen Krolosky 6681 Melbourne 6521 Halifax 6501 Sorento Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Debra Lodding Dale&Karen Lundberg Norma Magga 6511 Paris 15282 Newcastle 15332 Nottingham Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Earl&Bobbie Martin Jean Marton George Mathis 15172 Nottingham 6701 Melbourne 15082 Sevilla Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach.CA 92647 Mike&Terri McDowell Jim&Eileen Miller Bill Morgan 15221 Newcastle 15202 Yorkshire 15402 Hanover Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 From:Donnie Glaser Fax:714-892-65V Voice:714B924i637 To:Scott Minaml at:Prelsey Corp Page 4 of 6 Thursday.June 29,1995 9:43:64 AM i Marl:&Karan Morse Bayard&Virginia Nelson Kay Nelson 6851 Melbourne 6762 Canterbury 15141 Yorkshire Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Steve&Theresa Nelson Juanita Norsen Gary&Jacque Oberbeck 6962 Canterbury 15272 Nottingham 15172 Hanover Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Willian&Deborah Parcher Harry&Martha Payne Floyd Powell 6971 Canterbury 6511 Rome 6741 Cumberland Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach.CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Steven Rank Dolores Ranson Keith&Mimi Reise 15201 Newcastle 6532 Paris 15401 Norwich Huntinton Beach.CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Bill&Marylu Riding Bill&Evelyn Roberts Ruby Robertson 15201 Yorkshire 6772 Oxford 15161 Nottingham Huntinton Beach.CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Jim&Jennifer Robins Gunnar&Karen Rollefsen Kurt&Lois Rossten 15212 Nottingham 15202 Nottingham 6561 Melbourne Huntinton Beach.CA 92647 Huntinton Beach.CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Frank&Mary Rotter John&judy Ryan Mike&Michelle Rymer 6691 Oxford 15051 Eton 6842 Canterbury Huntinton Beach.CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 w Joe&Charline Saeman Judy Secor Rodney&Muriel Sroka 15082 Sussex 15031 Eton 6801 Melbourne Huntinton Beach.CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Dennis&Laura Shimko Al Shryer Jim&Kay Sidote 15292 Nottingham 6502 Paris 6622 Alexandria Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Penny Smith Aaron Speer Todd&Tammy Spencer 15252 Newcastle 15401 Victoria 15462 Hanover Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 rom:Donnie Glaser Fax:7148928537 Voice:T14892-653T To:Scott Minamf at:Prelsey Corp Pape 5 of 6 Thursday,June 29.1995 9:44:37 AM Art&Francine Steinbroner Ted&Betty Stelton Robert Sternberg 15181 Newcastle 6941 Oxford 15231 Nottingham Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Bernice Summerfield Marguerite Taylor Warren&Evelyn Underwood 6641 Melbourne 15442 Capri 15422 Salisbury Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Mr&Mrs Lance Unkovich Pat Vifquain Scott&Candy Wagers 15432 Hanover 15011 Sevilla 6841 Cumberland Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Cariene Waits Kevin&Susan Westley Scott&Brenda Wright 6961 Cumberland 15222 Nottingham 15252 Nottingham Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Vicki Zeuschner Frank&Betty Ziegler Teresa Heatley 15272 Newcastle 6511 Alexandria 15422 Capri Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach.CA 92647 Thelma Jamieson Thanh Xuan Cao Laura&Joe Gallo 6551 Alexandria 15221 Victoria 6761 Melbourne Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach.CA 92647 Huntinton Beach.CA 92647 Gary&Catherine Matta Robert&Vicki Mcvicker Alex Kim 6631 Oxford 15011 Hanover 15312 Hanover Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 MaryJo Reed Stan&Joyce Shaprio Bradley Pyle 15232 Hanover 6631 Melbourne 6562 Halifax Huntinton Beach.CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Mark&Kathleen Hammonds Ring Jim&Betty Joubert Joe&Donna Marla 15102 Hanover 6572 Rome 6511 Melbourne Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Mary McClurg Edwin Song Mike&Katie Bertram 15171 Nottingham 15171 Newcastle 6571 Melbourne Huntinton Beach.CA 92647 Huntinton Beach.CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 'rom:Donnie Glaser Fax:714-9924537 Voice:714492-6637 �To:Scott Minsmi at:Pralsey Corp Papa 6 of 6 Thursday,June 29,1996 9:46:19 AM Marcia&Sheldon Rosenzweig CiVilla Waller June Maijala 15052 Sevilla 15461 Victoria 15001 Sevilla Huntinton Beach.CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 Huntinton Beach,CA 92647 r .r.. r v 45....1 5-,..'08 1.45-1.52-0 ' 1.45-1.52'--1 0 ober t L King J[:?5iE?phl 0 De htiF.'OIF:•r dean R I'Iiill-'ton 681. Melh(:)ur''n;.., Di-- 6691 I`1c,•Ib(:iurne Dr 6:01. Melbourne Dr unn t:i.ngton 1'•:,r:ac:h CA rl 2647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington tlaF:.'ach CA 92647 .x.x.n .. h•'r i D't e r.i •x:.x* i2c- na a�T rs sc07-T' ►A I KA N rso 82- -5OVI c--- c4 Rct-6 Pr<c-;5�� co, ffXA/P M6-rZ�yrl X--RC14 Co� I g Co R PORAT-0 P-,,+77q CAI-, AIETZ6L D1S;1" . Dlc4e,N'AFL.6 / 15go2. CiI PR/ G�Z. -rnl: b&p\BAp-..q cw r nr.4r--�s HARL-OW AI\!b A<-- ATT�S H u A1r1A1aroy! peAcH cq z( cc-oEieWOOAP AU�MuC- 21 ( 13 MA 4 N '5;7r- q 2-41 47 r STM rniSr , CA (72.663 �tlu'Tl dorb ai540`f CA-,?2(.sSL 6 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXeXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX 1.45--1.44--06 E(0 14c;--144-..07 47 145-144-00 y Ronald & Susan Chadd James A & Elizabeth Brantley Paul & Uonna Chaffee 15401 Salisbury Ln 1.5,291 Salisbury I_n 15:392 Norwich Cir• Huntington Beach CA 92647 Flunti.ngton Eieach CA 92647 Huntington Iieach CA 92047 o 14`;-••144-09 4�1 145-144--•10 S Roger A ° I...isa Fortier Ronald M & Janice Wazewsk.i 15402 Norwich Cir 15422 Norwich Cir• Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 xxx 5 Printed xxx ` � 145-232-24 145-232-25 David S Mier Joseph T Hrovat Paul E & Kathryn Hanson 6172 Gleneagles CO- 16382 Magellan Ln 6901 Cumberland Dr- Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 145-234-01 ���� 145-234-02 u-_�/ 145-234-03 Martha J Naum Duanne H Bohne Michael W K Michelle Rymer 6822 Canterbury Dr 6832 Canterbury Dr 6842 Canterbury Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 14411004 E14 145-234-05 145-234-06 William V Riding Glenda J Murray Michael & Jo Berry � 15201 Yorkshire Ln 16561 Yucca Cir 15221 Yorkshire Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Fountain Valley CA 92708 Huntington Beach CA 92647 145-234-07 \��_�� 145-234-08 L---j 145-234-09 Lau Scott & Candy Wagers Richard S & Cathy Temple Daryle D Jacobs 6841 Cumberland DI- 6831 Cumberland Dr 6821 Cumberland Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 145-245-04 145-245-05 145-245-06 Robert P & Carol Brouhle Gunnar T Rollefsen James W Robins 15945 Mccord Cir 15202 Nottingham Ln 15212 Nottingham Ln Fo in Valley CA 92708 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 145-245-07 NUTS 145-245-08 Kevin R K Susan Westley Robert W Goodall 15222 Nottingham Ln 15232 Nottingham Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 *** 107 Printed *** Paul E Cushenber•ry 1.5361 Yorkshire Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 ,.lust,:i.t.o L. f obl ete 6841. Melbourne hr- I-unti.ngt.on Beach CA 9 647 1.45-141-06 a� Ladislaus R Sr•oka 6001 Melbourne hr- Hunti.ngton Beach CA 9647 145-141-..09 Joseph S & Laura Gallo 6761 Melbourne hr. Huntington Beach CA 92647 14`'.�-�1.4 -�01 33 'S Har•uhito & Nor•ik.o Matsumoto 15241 Victoria Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 14: •-•1.42-�04 3� Edward Mednick. 15281. Victoria Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 145-•1.42-•07 39 Richard C Li 15632 Uawson Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 145-1.43-•02 4 Z Steven R Hall 6722 Halifax Dr Huntington Reach CA 92647 AW 145-•144-W L--�� Kenneth S Cochran 15421 Salisbury Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 1.45-144-21. E�.�7 Everett M Clark 15891 Norwich Cir 1-1kir7ting•ton Beach CA 92647 14'--144-24 S� David C & Mari Harris 1.•`..�422 Victoria Ln Huntington Beach CA 9 647 145-144-35 Y ° Kuhwa Ku(.) 15391 Victoria Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 • 1.4 5 :1. .. .. -•09 Manuel G & Cynthia Torres 15351. Yorkshire Ln Huntington Beach CA 9 647 145-141-02 a3 Mark. ? Morse 6851. Melbourne hr- Hun•t•.i.ngton ]:reach CA 92647 145-141-05 Peter M Rudd 681.1 Melbourne Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 145-1.41-•08 a 1 Cheryl M Giesler 67BI Melbourne Ur• Huntington Beach CA 92647 145--..1.41-1.1 Graham v Julia Williams 6741 Melbourne Dr- Huntington Beach CA 92647 1.45-•142•-03 3J Jon G Kaae 15271 Victoria Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 1.45-142•-06 James ° Mary Katapodis 1581.1. Victoria Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 145-14S-01 `il Carlos A ° Michelle Sanchez 6732 Ha l i f am Dr- Huntington Beach CA 92647 145 -14S--04 E Craig H Everts. 21861 Star•f ir•e Ln Huntington Beach CA 92646 145•-1.44•-20 TEW M D Book.er•. 1.5401 Norwich Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 1.4 -...1.4 4--2:-' JrS James L. Bennett 15402 Victoria Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 145-14 4• 8 4 Aaron R Speer. 15401. Victoria Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92647 1. �-,....1. ::....� lit � Wi.l f r:i.d T Hair 1.5841 Yorkshire Ln - Huntington Beach CA 92647 Louis R Raymond 5312 Cornell Ave Westminster CA 9268.. 145-1.4:1.-04 Manuel Carba jal 1.9371. Baywa•ter Ln Huntington Beach CA 92646 1.45--1.41.-07 = Albert I_: ItotCsybar 6791. Melbourne Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 1.45-1.41--1.0 3 Louise T Smith 6751 Melbourne Dr- Huntington Beach CA 92647 y 1.4`' 142-•02 3 Luis A : Patricia Eigenmann 15251 Victoria Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 145-•142--05 . - Ruby Patai I 1.5291. Victoria Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 L4 L 145•-•1.42-•08 L..i k 1-1 Y U e n 15331 Victoria Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 14 ....1.4 ;-•0:3 43 Wa i C Wang 6821 I{ridgewater Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 1.45--1.44-1.9 5f Isabelle Is Vi.l 1 asenor 513 Dahlia Ave Corona Del Mar CA 92625 Robert A & Linda Geigel 1.5392 Victoria Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Fredrick. M Douglas 1.5421. Victoria Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 115-145-02 i lip Y & Catherine Chang ' 18888 Santa Marta St Fountain Valley CA 927013 145-153-34 Janice L. Messina Via 15402 Florence Cir• Hun•ti.ngton Beach CA 92647 145•-iB4•-•02 EK Scott K Weight 1 252 Nottingham Ln any Huntington Beach CA 92 647 1.45-184-•05 Dennis G ° Laura Shi.mk.o 15292 Nottingham I._n Huntington Beach CA 92647 145-•184•--0£3 �5OTTO Norma Magga 15::32 Nottingham Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 145 2 -•01 L_il i L-ak.sber•ger 6812 Canterbury Dr- Huntington Beach CA 92647 Patricia145-223-04 A Tyler 6782 Canterbury Dr- Huntington Beach CA 92647 1.4 2.:.3-07 E-3 Dennis M ° Denise Brent 6742 Canterbury Dr Huntington Beach CA 9 647 14`=1•-•2 2 3•-•1.0 Donald A Andr•easen 6771 Cumberland Br Huntington Beach CA 92647 -.. 13 lj�A BPI. 6801 Cumberland Dr- Huntington Beach CA 92647 1.45•-224-•05 �3 Thelma L Hodges 15201. Victoria Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 1.45-224•-0L3 ! b Wilda T C:ar••ter- 1.5231. Victoria L..n Huntington Beach CA 92647 Marren C Underwood . . 45422 Salisbury I_.17 ,`' A . Huntington Beach CA 92641 - 8 John W Coyl e 15392 Florence Ci.r• Huntington Beach CA 92647 1.45-•-184-0: .lames h Otto I 1.5552 Wild Plum Ci.r Huntington Beach CA 92647 145-184-06 W.T. Gregory J ° June Maltsberger 1.•312 Nottingham Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 1.45-1.85-08 Stephen J & Linda Scuk.anec: 6692 Halifax Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 i 145-22 -02 5 _-1 John Owens 6802 Canterbury Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 -4.i.4,J 0•_� Mayme J Slaughter 6772 Canterbury Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 C-223 U aJ 14...E ...�,.,-Of:i .�- • Floyd G Powell FCl Box 1234 Huntington Beach CA 92647 _ 145 '"23-1.1 Timothy D R Marcia Beck. 6781. Cumberland Di Huntington Beach CA 92647 1.4' 223- 14 � J Ken Beaulieu PO Box 1.601. Huntington Beach CA 92647 1.45-224-06 !GY Kathleen Armstrong 15211 Victoria Ln Huntington Iseac:h CA 92647 r. 232 nn I James A Miller 15202 Yorkshire Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 j i i Andrew t"a Hanscom 15892 Salisbury Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 1145-153-8 Gregory [' ' . _ 1.:--_i412 1 or-ence Cir intington Beach C:A 92647 1.45--184•-•01 Gloria Bathe 1.5242 Nottingham Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 1.45-•184•-•04 Josephs V Licata 15282 Nottingham Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 ; 1.45-•-184•-07 James & Barbara Hammack 15322 Nottingham Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 14 5•-1..55•-•09 C-I-7 Dean L Frandsen 6702 Halifax Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92647 0 . 3-03 David S Mier• 61.7,2 Gleneagles Ci.r• Huntington Beach CA 9264B 145-223-06 Bayard R Nelson 6762 Canterbury Dr- Huntington Beach CA 92647 145-228-09 Nicole T Hoang 6761 Cumberland Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92647 145-228-12 Dennis J ° Melissa Henry 6791 Cumberland Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92647 22 � Z ' Paul B & Sonia Hazel gr•en 15181. Victoria Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 1.45--2 24-07 �s Thanh x o My Cao 15221. Victoria Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 145-131-06 ( � � 145-131-O7 F2_1 145-131-O8- George S Titriga Donald J Glaser Edward J Divinski ~---� . 6902 Cumberland Dr 15252 Yorkshire Ln 15262 Yorkshire Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 145-131-09 145-131-10 145-131-21 L�� � Lin L Sze Stanley E Newton Fon T Jiang ` � 4145 Lincoln Ave 6861 Skyview Dr 1911 Alsuna Ln � Culver City CA 90232 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92648 - ` � ��� � fig [�/145-131-22 145-131-23 �=-~ 145-131-24 Frances M Hay Jacquelene John Hahn Clarence M Sasano � 15312 Yorkshire Ln 15332 Yorkshire Ln 15342 Yorkshire Ln � ` Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 ' ` � 145-131-25 [!��� 145-133-01 William H Heien each ' Vlastimil Chvojka ` 6901 Brunswick Dr 15251 Yorkshire Ln ' Huntington Beach CA 92647 ' n.4 ,n Bch CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Al �145-133-O2 145-133-O3 �--- 145-133-04 �--' ` `� '���'_` ' ` Alfred N & Mary Brackett David A Johnson George Kayo 15261 Yorkshire Ln 4921 Los Patos Dr 15291 Yorkshire Ln ' . ` Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92647 � (��3 ' �- 145-133-05 \ U� 145- VT133-O6 145-133-07 / pr/ Mitchell J Maureen Argon Glenn W Martin Peter P & Delores Armstrong 15301 Yorkshire Ln 15311 Yorkshire Ln PO Box 941 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Lucerne Valley CA 92356 ' ' ' e� l v 1 5 f I Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach r ; Office of the City Clerk '' • P.O. Box 19!) I .y• `I a Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Charles Gran t T B Wetlands 21902 Kiowa Lane AMINGTO Huntington Beach,CA 92646 ' O =MGOPPONq JF �/, _ GANT90a* 926461019 13.94 07/10/95 FORWARDING TIME EXPIRED Q GANT'CHARLE5 Z 8436 LA RIVIERA DR CF �Fd-1Is`9gp0 \��Q SACRAMENTO CA 95826-i721 cUUNTY cP� RETURN TO SENDER LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING - III.,.II,,,�.II��II��II�„II���II���II������IIII,��II�„II���I .• ' pq Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk / Huntington Box 190 untington B each, CA 92648 ° :.� •-.. [•:�" - c.;;: ,,..;�,; u Tawnia Cobb TINGj�y� 6671 Melbourne =COgi0gq7Fo � rnHuntinton Beach,CA 92647 � JV 009 lO6e 7 T IRWA DINGITIME'S94 7/10/9S p�NTY CP tdUN�INGDDON DR EXPIRED - - LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC R R CA Q2647-4607 _ IC HEARING " To SEND - r as _ .nit...it...itn....till.nit...it.. --•__. • City Clerk Connie Brockway,C _ City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 r• t"e • a 145-1.84-01 (� _ T� Y'��' �`'.,, r,:•.'y J„ fir- � G1 or•i<< Gathe � INGTpy 1.5242 Notti.n91-1iim , (, ,Q Himtin-3ton E;each� CA *4�647 �Al` FF6 17. 1909. PETITION TO CITY COUNCIL RE: GILL SCHOOL SITE DEVELOPMENT We, the undersigned residents of Goldenwest Estates,do.protest the action of the city planning commission to allow single family home construction on lots as small as 4319 square feet with 50 foot frontages with an average lot size of 5456 square feet. We request that the city require any builder developing the Gill school site (INFTLL) to conform to the EXISTING 6000 square foot minimum lot size,frontage/parkway standards and on-street parking provisions as well as other neighborhood standards as established by the EXISTING homes which surround the site on all four sides. NAME ADDRESS / DATE J 1. AtllCS L. �e.✓,Ye�7L �541�a �/G7vr'i�w �^' 7�o�fs p ' t m.i. ]as nature 2. (76-/ n 7— print m.i, last signatur 3. /L.1 Pri (0 m.i. t� 711 sign e 4. s �� }(�crDis /S 311 a Lnl hf$ 7/o pri in. Sig ture 5. P TAIL 1 -5_�2qI V1C70reiA -L-Al HS to t p 'nt(t) 1111 , lrt n 67 = A�d f) m.' last sign t re ,\\ 7. . h61' & tV Q (,( 15 3 92 V)' mi�_ LN - p ' m.i. t St sign t re , �� G��/ �53 Q� 8. 4 7 print m.i. la 9si nt,( m.i. last signature g . J3h�3�3u) PETITION TO CITY COUNCIL RE: GILL SCHOOL SITE DEVELOPMENT We, the undersigned residents of Goldenwest Estates,do protest the action of the city planning commission to allow single family home construction on lots as small as 4319 square feet with 50 foot frontages with an average lot size of 5456 square feet. We request that the city require any builder developing the Gill school site (INFILL) to conform to the EXISTING 6000 square foot minimum lot size,frontage/parkway standards and on-street parking provisions as well as other neighborhood standards as established by the EXISTING homes which surround the site on all four sides. NAME ADDRESS DATE 1. ���o r/ !� .S'p��/e IJ-4 O l //1,072O e;A -rat y print m.i. last si ure 2. f �S (r ��llJ �li1J p IF ' m las L sl ^- / signature 4. M t c44' /L print (f) rn.i. last 5. qure J 'j"5—Le�_Q_r f 5 4-rQ C_-�/ ka—A-Q., m.i�ast signature 6. 9 print(f) m.i. last J i signMe print(f) m i. I t signature �/ ��^ 8. pr t(f) m.i. as signatu 9 n0 i pri t . last i q "r 1 �`i RU19NIAnH signature sC "W 03A633H i • PETITION TO CITY COUNCIL RE: GILL SCHOOL SITE DEVELOPMENT We, the undersigned residents of Goldenwest Estates, do protest the action of the city planning commission to allow single family home construction on lots as small as 4319 square feet with 50 foot frontages with an average lot size of 5456 square feet. We request that the city require any builder developing the Gill school site (INFILL) to conform to the EXISTING 6000 square foot minimum lot size, frontage/parkway standards and on-street parking provisions as well as other neighborhood standards as established by the EXISTING homes which surround the site on all four sides. NAME ADDRESS DATE SO m.i. la signature 570/e/ET62 4,7y/ 6 1'� leP. ,pof pr%l,J,fyf• s��i. I t signature print r signature 4. Fta ell print(fir [ m.i.� last signature 5._ _5 h i r 1 e :j r1 l e 14 e.�-_ /S 2G-7 /Jy�- prin irst) m. . last signature r77 6. �i co�4 ��'MZvI CA/ 1 S Gv print si nature , 7 >n 4 ��s►c, k a ac-� t J v 1 tJ� �7 0 4�' ,C ►-�• 7�� f Q J print(first) .i. last signature $ g G print(first) m.i. last` 2— signature 9. C l� print(first m.i. last s '. fi 8 L Jnr f,,Y �, �.ta►filNny signature N83•1-, Ali �3ti3�3u �9'�i C u�c��,c�• � c,�z PETITION TO CITY COUNCIL RE: GILL SCHOOL SITE DEVELOPMENT We, the undersigned residents of Goldenwest Estates, do protest the action of the city planning commission to allow single family home construction on lots as small as 4319 square feet with 50 foot frontages with an average lot size of 5456 square feet. We request that the city require any builder developing the Gill school site (INFILL) to conform to the EXISTING 6000 square foot minimum lot size,frontage/parkway standards and on-street parking provisions as well as other neighborhood standards as established by the EXISTING homes which surround the site on all four sides. NAME J , ADDRESS DATE 1. E©,� [�J CUf����S �i�0,( �Y'� print(first i. last, Q signature 2. ll?cr print(first) last signature 6 U 3. rr/S /� �drr�r�dcs Fp2 �i'7 (first) m i. last Z `7,9,, 69 k, POK-7,�7 4 • t(first) m.i. st c� ti �= —signature 1 su1 q2&q prim t) m.i. st signature 6. GtNA ZoNNF_2 i5Z7) No-Pti,e1-.Q,.. In , H�l�, 9?1,q-7 7/1U1�� print(first) m.i last gn 7. re Eli VE7-S 4-( C:UM191e%L &Lf) Q print ?rs) i. ast /1 _ l4(y it(�jtilGT!`jC�f �f signature _ -)-- 1�/u2�f �o7�t I C UMg�LA-N u� _ print(first) m �-.i. last 0"T7 N C> �N &E-A" print(fir i�Ia 926 y 3- signature PETITION TO CITY COUNCIL RE: GILL SCHOOL SITE DEVELOPMENT We, the undersigned residents of Goldenwest Estates, do protest the action of the city planning commission to allow single family home construction on lots as small as 4319 square feet with 50 foot frontages with an average lot size of 5456 square feet. We request that the city require any builder developing the Gill school site (INFILL) to conform to the EXISTING 6000 square foot minimum lot size, frontage/parkway standards and on-street parking provisions as well as other neighborhood standards as established by the EXISTING homes which surround the site on all four sides. NAME ADDRESS DATE 1. MAR -'T. 6nU )MAC print t �J. last C - si nat re g r 14 Pd �.)14 a 3 2, 44-15'4", niv- pri ( ' ) .1. 1st ature print(first) m L a t s'gn re nKrn signature 5.,/ti g y/ L 1)7 '�fjj R 4772 6,f4W__9BdRy '7 J¢ -f5 print(first) m.i. I signature 6. . nL d4-v--" 1,26 C print( st) m.i.Mast signal e 7. tza ( 7 7 7 A b S print(firs ) .i. last signature 8 6 sr prin t m.i. la ur !!'q 9. a7 rint5re 0 MI. t SOo hJ to l I IT si -Nov]. 14019Ni1Nl1N J0 All;) NL3'3 Alij 33A1333,w b PETITION TO CITY COUNCIL RE: GILL SCHOOL SITE DEVELOPMENT We, the undersigned residents of Goldenwest Estates, do protest the action of the city planning commission to allow single family home construction on lots as small as 4319 square feet with 50 foot frontages with an average lot size of 5456 square feet. We request that the city require any builder developing the Gill school site (INFILL) to conform to the EXISTING 6000 square foot minimum lot size,frontage/parkway standards and on-street parking provisions as well as other neighborhood standards as established by the EXISTING homes which surround the site on all four sides. NAME ADDRESS DATE 1. )W AiUG &J. AJ 6 y�/� 6 9 a2 �7�rs�i��-t �','r. 7-/G S print(fir t) m.'. Jast 2signat 6 dr pr t(first) m.i. last C_ Uj oci signature � I� 3. it, A, OwoQd. (s print(first) m.i. last in,AW &ML signature 4. Jo u c P_ �`rl • 'fZ�� r�s ► o YorVr,h( re L..n 7—'/(so`9S print first) m.i. last signa ure 5. �I hi w S -it�uC.a�a r r_: ! SZS2 f pint(�rst� rn.i. la t� � siigl ature 7�(•� print(first) md, ilast signature l� �)/ �- n 7. � J C�^t ,, -l/c't.IrLii V /4 ;>— 4 print(first) m.i. lasty ��I Deo-t6ce- MX5ffBEL--E,GravES Cum.bar- aCL% d circle. sign0pre h,�en�Vl• 4dakdo aye4 print(first) m.i. last sign re 9. a —� PA 0 1 C U m SbPs d creAe print first) nTY last 1C�t f l7, signature �C .,'.ji J 03Ai303u • • PETITION TO CITY COUNCIL RE: GILL SCHOOL SITE DEVELOPMENT We, the undersigned residents of Goldenwest Estates, do protest the action of the city planning commission to allow single family home construction on lots as small as 4319 square feet with 50 foot frontages with an average lot size of 5456 square feet. We request that the city require any builder developing the Gill school site (INHLL) to conform to the EXISTING 6000 square foot minimum lot size, frontage/parkway standards and on-street parking provisions as well as other neighborhood standards as established by the EXISTING homes which surround the site on all four sides. NAME ADDRESS DATE /Y6 print st) .i. t si ature d 2. JLEE 6 SPa/V613f Z& �� prin (fi t m.i. last 3. pri fir m. la 4sn t_ure �`IrJIR pri t(first) Mi. 1—ast s ature p brint(first) m.i. last 4-22-2 Sig 6Y print(fir ) last Sign �o T. print first) m.i. last ssig re 1 3 S� -1 1 print(fi m.i la t signs rem Q.C,n+-4_*NVk- P�\C� (Q C�3\ r2S C�A IN C\ 9. print(fire[) m i. last ho 8 l I »� signatur 311 ���"'8 F4010HilNlltl 'C 4113 ullgl j Alit 03A I333� PETITION TO CITY COUNCIL RE: GILL SCHOOL SITE DEVELOPMENT We, the undersigned residents of Goldenwest Estates, do protest the action of the city planning commission to allow single family home construction on lots as small as 4319 square feet with 50 foot frontages with an average lot size of 5456 square feet. We request that the city require any builder developing the Gill school site (INFILL) to conform to the EXISTING 6000 square foot minimum lot size, frontage/parkway standards and on-street parking provisions as well as other neighborhood standards as established by the EXISTING homes which surround the site on all four sides. NAME ADDRESS DATE 1. Gti'►h-die v. a . -�►, 7,��- ys� print(first) m.i. last 2Sig�1t A boulrn& L- diAM 4 print f st) m.i. last C , / �y signat�� 3 print(fir i. last signaVre n�IZ lt eX46 �' `� �S � I 11 -k ,1 1' � b 1- L _LJ print(first) m.i. last signature 5. 9Plvh-tc� �. t,Satl,o rS3YZ qe ksuut., (a4_e, print(first) m.i. last signature 6. t0 i lb awr #ei >!l,� 6 90 I f1041Av/6!•rr 464' print st_ , signature V1-;7L s .� �� 11S 4!i/ ( st) m.i. 1st si n t re8. R, LQ i.J1 5 3) &UA14 W1 Cx prin firs m.ii..��last 9S'gr a L-Oa2S �d /ems—�'I C u�,e� �` �l �✓�?/ Sw(���G� pri first) m.i. Je € 0 �f signature .1. 40l:)Nilp(ly C AIM 03A1303e '�o • • PETITION TO CITY COUNCIL RE: GILL SCHOOL SITE DEVELOPMENT We, the undersigned residents of Goldenwest Estates,do protest the action of the city planning commission to allow single family home construction on lots as small as 4319 square feet with 50 foot frontages with an average lot size of 5456 square feet. We request that the city require any builder developing the Gill school site (INFILL) to conform to the EXISTING 6000 square foot minimum lot size, frontage/parkway standards and on-street parking provisions as well as other neighborhood standards as established by the EXISTING homes which surround the site on all four sides. NAME ADDRESS DATE 1. A f2_0 k/ J ti/U (��/1 Gc,{rl��l t-L,c1 Al d print(0 m.i. last signature 2. � � .cJ U• 7-1 S ~�� p ' (t) rr�i. last Sign re 3 i. last, 4sign re �� �� liU IQ>✓R��L �l� 713 �S pri 0 i. s[ signat re 5. eo 1 trz. 7-/,s print m.i. last OQ sign I— p 6. 7TA '� p nt signature VL45 r(M(L. Cry v01 7. print(f) m.i. lastad4'Na A�ke,' signature$ �grm C UOSK i5�2s1 o�KSI�tR � (�-. �} .13 7- 13— �S print(1) m.i. st 9._11d re� �A r � 1.CK� Sh 1� 4a/ ��v 13 l 46- NN QV print(0 m.i. last s UV t 0 si ature 'I �n liC- 40L94iLTi11M VLJ3�� .tlf 13AI333e I PETITION TO CITY COUNCIL RE: GILL SCHOOL SITE DEVELOPMENT We, the undersigned residents of Goldenwest Estates,do protest the action of the city planning commission to allow single family home construction on lots as small as 4319 square feet with 50 foot frontages with an average lot size of 5456 square feet. We request that the city require any builder developing the Gill school site (INFILL) to conform to the EXISTING 6000 square foot minimum lot size,frontage/parkway standards and on-street parking provisions as well as other neighborhood standards as established by the EXISTING homes which surround the site on all four sides. NAME ADDRESS DATE 1.-DONAIR C SYortr- GrVl C,90&WeUl_y Og t'19 print(f) m.i. last signature 2. 'I`I'&'- v 1 G I U 7�J a xLJrd �71� f-f'►�J l 1 ` Cl�- p ' t(0 m.i.I last signgfpre 3. p n i la signature 4. 0 �-- Vn7() m.i. las�t si at re 1�5 cr Z 7 print(f) in last S nt(f) i. last 19 signature P 7. Ael -2 D, x V (a 8-0 1 4 e_ L Z, ,, _Y.771/15;�5 print(1) in ' last 8.- -a print signature 9. Lot-( rn>LL 7 q T* C.vn(3SPLhPD,0R 7 13 f 9S printry.i. jast d11r 56a Hiv �O D L I In signature �c Alice, , 03ht3�3N PETITION TO CITY COUNCIL RE: GILL SCHOOL SITE DEVELOPMENT We, the undersigned residents of Goldenwest Estates,do protest the action of the city planning commission to allow single family home construction on lots as small as 4319 square feet with 50 foot frontages with an average lot size of 5456 square feet. We request that the city require any builder developing the Gill school site (INFILL) to conform to the EXISTING 6000 square foot minimum lot size,frontage/parkway standards and on-street parking provisions as well as other neighborhood standards as established by the EXISTING homes which surround the site on all four sides. NAME ADDRESS DATE 1. A101121K0 SU O D 15 -2� V I WOIQ/A Lit AE N ATiU y 7oti#,z_A(-1 print(f) m.i. last , 2-6 signat red / 2. 1 / A SZ3 t /Ile x is \►'4�- //, 7�i print(f) m.i. last signature 3. TVrA n1•!1 )(Ow cAo ts221 V I LrM Rl A 1M . Ly I 1 print m.i last signature 4. h ti Lln,kt cetD lS 22/ ✓i -7a print(f) m.i. last 0 i n_ signatu e 5. / 0,/rrr,4- f 5- print(f) m.i. last signature print(f) m.i. last signature 7. print m.i. last si re 8�4-m L'S PA 01 ofL-L-bn/ 5 t f V1 a-0,94 n 1u. tff),n ma. last� ce L > G�hfer� Te4 print( i last fi0 8 L I Inr signature �nr� !;:;��� NOl3ttllN(1H 30 ,li.''. k3313 ,tlf:) 03AI333H PETITION TO CITY COUNCIL RE: GILL SCHOOL SITE DEVELOPMENT We, the undersigned residents of Goldenwest Estates,do protest the action of the city planning commission to allow single family home construction on lots as small as 4319 square feet with 50 foot frontages with an average lot size of 5456 square feet. We request that the city require any builder developing the Gill school site (INFILL) to conform to the EXISTING 6000 square foot minimum lot size,frontage/parkway standards and on-street parking provisions as well as other neighborhood standards as established by the EXISTING homes which surround the site on all four sides. NAME ADDRESS DATE 1. .�r2 2 0V S l rc., ` 4 3 rint(f) m.i. 1st si azure 2. 1\ I I 11 4t)Ir 1��I , l in � p ' t(t) .i. 1 t DQ signature 3. G/-/eFS7E /Z eYYla/j 679/ 09N7-a/?Bqt'Z'l 7) f3 - gS print(f) m.i. last S signature 4. �.�fie� �✓Bi?�4c,C /�LG� `o,e.er,�, l.✓. . 7/3 '�'s pr;iW. last 5. n re " (L . '-t '^ 1CLl I Ira (,i.� . I,) Jv t 4 print rn.i. last sig ature 6. I 3/ 0&"M� .i. last gnat re �. � j�, >-� r. 2 Fps i Yo Irs�„�� n� prin last sign ure 8. //Z - - print(1) m.i. last - si to �13�G�. 9. prin ( M.i. last 1! to inr ggnat 6 t`v a �V ` MVif, 4019NiiNnH 03A63R.' J PETITION TO CITY COUNCIL RE: GILL SCHOOL SITE DEVELOPMENT We, the undersigned residents of Goldenwest Estates,do protest the action of the city planning commission to allow single family home construction on lots as small as 4319 square feet with 50 foot frontages with an average lot size of 5456 square feet. We request that the city require any builder developing the Gill school site (INFILL) to conform to the EXISTING 6000 square foot minimum lot size,frontage/parkway standards and on-street parking provisions as well as other neighborhood standards as established by the EXISTING homes.which surround the site on all four sides. NAME ADDRESS DATE I.At�,07_ printA ma. la sign tune ><��za V i 091-i a Ln• 2. M CAIci 1- H0►1-ViC, ! B��. print m.i. last n signa re 3. ry�vgZ/ print( i. last 4s�g ife/iPLEy cr>�c� 657,1- print i. last signature 5. eA2LL_2 A print(1) .i. Ist signat l/ 6. 1 \ ' Z p •n m 1 s sig atu 7. MA-R- A UEN J5331 ylc`TeR4A jw . print(f) ma. t signatur 8. d h rClkU-t' IS Z11 �/� Lw 7/6 Ice f print last signat re p ' t(fj m.i. last ' � »f signature So l f 31i '?•H Jr�� ►{J19HI1Ntty Ac A1[;'. VL3?j- Alit GRi333>; PETITION TO CITY COUNCIL RE: GILL SCHOOL SITE DEVELOPMENT We, the undersigned residents of Goldenwest Estates,do protest the action of the city planning commission to allow single family home construction on lots as small as 4319 square feet with 50 foot frontages with an average lot size of 5456 square feet. We request that the city require any builder developing the Gill school site (INFTLL) to conform to the EXISTING 6000 square foot minimum lot size, frontage/parkway standards and on-street parking provisions as well as other neighborhood standards as established by the EXISTING homes which surround the site on all four sides. NAME ADDRESS DATE 1. print(f) m.i. las��� . signature 2. dG'/y /�. [3U TIC r-_-1ei-.f2 print( m.i last signature -r 3. SIG u bi 7-/(IT printyst signature 4. pn signature print(1) i. last 6s' n lure pn m.i. last 7s� (Z rl 4.1— (Z LA— T__C_ print J. 11 signature 8. ,,0 (ra e. M prnn m.i. last signat re S 9; �S print Mi. last SO i ature PETITION TO CITY COUNCIL RE: GILL SCHOOL SITE DEVELOPMENT We, the undersigned residents of Goldenwest Estates,do protest the action of the city planning commission to allow single family home construction on lots as small as 4319 square feet with 50 foot frontages with an average lot size of 5456 square feet. We request that the city require any builder developing the Gill school site (INFILL) to conform to the EXISTING 6000 square foot minimum lot size,frontage/parkway standards and on-street parking provisions as welt as other neighborhood standards as established by the EXISTING homes which surround the site on all four sides. NAME ADDRESS DATE 1. pri a t signat 2 r j/ fL print(f) la t 3siggaturN 0 1 0 rJ cx_ a G���� �7 �sk �1 (f) m i, last sign re c> l! uV �9 �113/1� 4. ! � m ' 1st In U i signature 5. 'DA,140 C. HP%)R,9_1K IS4Z-t- Y►Cmro_ars L_Pgj:_ kAJ3. 7-Ilo-cfS p ' (f) rrni.Ct o signature 6. print(f) m.i. last signature 7. print(f) m.i. last signature 8. print(f) m.i. last signature 9. print(f) m.i. last so 8 11 �f signature 311y:i 'N�:3r NO10►rI1Nf1H jC All" 4 4310 Alit 03M333d August 7 R (S$ ED FROM �� N6 ADE A PAR OF*T E CiFi 9` THE COUNCIL MEETING OF i1 S Attention City council members: OFFICE OF THE CITY CLE K CONNIE BROOKWAY,CITY CLERK My name is David Harris, I live at 15422 Victoria lane in Huntington Beach. I would like the four following attachments included in the public record regarding the rezoning of the Gill school site to allow for residential development. I would also like to offer the following explanation along with these items. Item 1: This is a copy of a letter I wrote to the planning commission regarding the proposed development at the Gill school site. It should be borne in mind that this letter was written prior to the planning commission meeting. At that time I had not had an opportunity to read the city staff report regarding the proposed development. The planning commission meeting was held on June 13, 1995. Item 2: This is a copy of a letter I sent to Councilmen Bauer and Sullivan at the suggestion of planning commissioner Kerins. He mentioned to me after the planning commission meeting that they would be very interested in receiving a copy of my letter, i.e. Item 1. Note that the date of the letter is June lb, 1995 --three days after the planning commission meeting. At that time,I assumed that this would constitute an appeal to the city council. The planning commission chairman did not mention a"formal"appeal process. He said, "O.K., as always this matter can be appealed to the city council,"at the end of the planning commission meeting. Item 3: This is a copy of a letter that I received from Mayor Victor Leipzig. Note that the date on the letter is June 21, 1995--less than 10 calendar days after the planning commission meeting. Of particular note is the fact that nowhere in the letter does he mention that there is a formal appeal process to be followed. After reading the "process"requirements--it seems to me my letter addressed to the city clerk along with a check for$500.00 (or$1200.00?) would have constituted a formal appeal. Instead, he referred my letter to Melanie Fallon. Had I been informed of the"process"I certainly would have followed the required letter procedure and payment requirements. Item 4: This is a copy of another letter I received from the city. It notes receipt of my letter. It restates the city planning director's support for the project. It also states that the city can do whatever it pleases. Looking at the signature, it is not surprising to note that the letter is signed by Howard Zelefsky (for Mellanie Fallon). Again,nowhere in the letter is there mention of the fact that I should have sent my letter to the city clerk along with $500.00 to constitute a formal appeal. XO_/1 If one reads my two letters (items 1 and 2) , the intent is clear. I think it is reprehensible for the average citizen to not be informed of his rights and the associated procedures required to exercise them. To play the game of"you must ask the right question"in order to hide my right to file a formal appeal is simply incredible! I think the fact that the mayor responded to my letter with no mention of how to formally file an appeal is reprehensible. To write another letter again omitting the appeal process simply reinforces my belief that the omission was intentional. I've been told that the appeal process is common knowledge. Why then did both the mayor and the city planning director see fit to NOT inform me? It appears that the city is in the business of not telling citizens of those things that have the potential to directly impact them in a negative way. When I went out and collected approximately 130 signatures(refer to public record for July 17 city council meeting) protesting the reduced lot size of the development, almost all of those people who signed the petition did not know of the limited parking,reduced lot size, and other aspects of the development. I want this attachment as part of the public record to show the callous and uncaring attitude the city shows to at least one citizen who has tried to let his views and protestations be known. It is truly a sad state of affairs when an average citizen has to view his own city government as an adversary who will only provide information required by law and only when asked directly. Sincerely, i�� 6s A Very unhappy citizen 2 ' ,•.x term 3 • • J� City of Huntington Beach . 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Telephone(714)536-5553 June 21, 1995 Mr. Dave Harris 15422 Victoria Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Dear Mr. Harris: Thank you for your letter dated June 16, 1995 regarding the residential development at the abandoned Gill school site. A copy of your letter has been referred to Melanie Fallon, Director of Community Development, asking that she respond directly to you. If you should have questions, she can be reached at 536-5455. On behalf of all the City Council members, we are grateful that you have brought your concerns to our attention. If we can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Yours truly, Victor Leipzig, Ma/yo City of Huntington Beach VL:PD:lp 243 Anio,Japan SISTER CITIES V ailakerc. Nc,, Zealand 1 tem I : s 1�ec�' l of 2 • • June 10 , 1995 Attn: Huntington Beach Planning Commission: Dear Mr. Zelefsky, I wish to register my protests as a taxpaying homeowner in the city of Huntington Beach to zone change No. 94-4/Conditional use permit No . 94/26/Tentative Tract Map No . 14990/ Negative Declaration 94-14 (Gill School Site ) as noted in the Notice of Public Hearing for June 13 , 1995 for the following reasons : 1 . I feel the Westminster School District has severely underestimated the number or children that will brought in by the new construction. The most recent study results paid for by the school district estimated , if I recall correctly , that 17 children would be brought in by the new construction. The hired hand of the Presley company when he made his pitch to the local concerned residents at the Schoreder school estimated 2 children per home which leads to an excess of 100 children. Someone , ( the school . district, I suspect ) is deliberately being misleading . Additionally, I believe that the Westminster school district is violating its fiduciary responsibility by selling off fixed assets that were given by the builder as a condition of the construction of this original subdivision. As soon as this land is sold , there will no longer be a school site in the neighborhood . It will be exceedingly difficult to procure a similar site in the future ; it will be impossible to find a comparable site in the future for the same price the school is receiving . Is it any wonder there is less and less support for the public school system when the long term concerns of the local public are not considered? 2 . I protest the allowance of any lots smaller than 6000 square feet . 6000 square feet is the established standard lot size in this neighborhood. I see no reason why the existing standard in .the neighborhood should be violated . The economics of the Presley company being able to realize a profit or not should have no bearing on the standards the city should apply in approving this project. The approval of substandard (less than 6000 square feet ) lots by the city is especially suspect since the city has a vested monetary interest ( fees , fees , fees ! ) in packing as many houses as possible onto the tract of land. Where is the limit? Does the statement "would not have any significant environmental effect" mean that 5800 , 5000 , 4000, 3000 , or even 1000 square foot lots would be OK. ? Every additional house built over what the current 6000 square foot lot size would allow leads to an incremental increase in traffic, parking congestion, noise and small but real general reductions in the quality of life in the area especially when compared to the current smaller houses on 6000 square foot lots and/or the prior low congestion public school function. 3 . I also protest the fact that Presley is being allowed to violate the previously established standards in construction for the neighborhood which has parkways and block wall fences--both items that the Presley hired hand mentioned are not planned for the current construction. Parkways are definitely an enhancement 1 . ' �:�... I • s 1.«t z of z • • in the quality of the neighborhood. Wooden fences are definitely a negative in the construction of a single family dwelling ; wooden fences do eventually decay. Why not require the Presley company to maintain the current standards in the neighborhood? Again, the economics of Presley being able to make money or not should not be a concern of the city. Preserving the quality of the neighborhoods in Huntington Beach should be a concern of the city council and the planning commission who are employees of the citizens of the city. 4 . I also find it unconscionable that two whole working days are allowed for a copy of the staff report to be available to interested parties . This make it essentially impossible for people with jobs to view it. What kinds of secrets does it hold that the city will allow two working days for viewing prior to the hearing? I wish this letter to be made part of the public record regarding this project. If the project must be allowed, at least it should follow the standards or be better in all aspects when compared with the current neighborhood . The city representatives owe nothing less to the citizens who pay their salaries . Sincerely, David C. Harris A concerned resident 2 June 16 , 1995 Dear Councilmen Bauer and Sullivan: My name is Dave Harris , I live at 15422 Victoria lane in the north end of the city. Attached you will find a copy of a letter I wrote to the Huntington Beach planning commission regarding a residential development at the abandoned Gill school site near my house in Huntington Beach.. I must confess that it is the original "barking dog" letter in that it attempts to object to the development on every possible point I could imagine . However , there is one point in the letter that I cannot overemphasize--the lot size. The current zoning for the existing houses in the neighborhood allows for a minimum 6000 square foot lot for a single family dwelling. The proposed tract allows for a house in excess of 2000 square feet to be built on a lot as small as 4300 square feet . This is outrageous ! How can a 2000 square foot house on a lot 30% smaller than the existing lot size be compatible with the current neighborhood? A 6000 square foot lot is small , but a 4300 square foot lot is unbelievable in the current neighborhood. Also, I was amazed at the cavalier attitude of the planning commission and the city staff. The city staff just rolled over and did whatever the developer (Presley) wanted them to do . All the developer had to do was ask . There was no evidence or persuasive arguments presented to show why the lot size in an existing neighborhood should be allowed to be made so much smaller. The new homes will be completely surrounded on four sides by the current housing tract. Mr. Zelefsky made the comment in closing that the current code allows for this lot size . However , he did admit that the ordinance was rather vague in addressing exactly how existing infill should be addressed . Commissioner Hadee Tillitson said the planning process was a matter or give and take. Well , it seems to me that Presley is doing a lot of taking and the city planning commission is doing a lot of giving . When the matter of lot size came up, commissioner Holden said that 4300 square feet Was a lot size "he could live with. " I really question that. I wonder if he would be as happy if the lot sizes in his neighborhood were allowed to be downsized so much . As for the other members of the city planning commission, they were , for the most part, silent partners of the developer. From the start I could see that commissioner Kerins is a man of reason (He agreed with me . ) He seems to take seriously his responsibility as a steward for the public . I think the merit of my argument convinced commissioner Biddle that what I had to say regarding the smaller lot size had right on its side. 1 I do not want to stop the developer . That is not my i intention. I just want the city, which has the power, to ensure that the development is done in a way that will not degrade the quality of the neighborhood. . The only reason the builder wants to have 58 houses on the property rather than the 53 that would be permitted by the existing code is money. I do not think that the financial rewards to the builder should be a higher concern than the well being and maintenance of neighborhoods for the citizens of Huntington Beach. You are stewards of the public trust- in this case the Huntington Beach citizens in my neighborhood. Remember, too, that if this lot size (4300 square feet ) is permitted in this neighborhood , you as the city council , will be setting the standard for future lot sizes associated with other infill projects elsewhere in the city. You will not have a legitimate reason to refuse in the future as you will have already established the precedent for what the minimum lot size is to be. Gentlemen, I . ask your support in the effort to make the builder do right by the citizens in this neighborhood by keeping the current standards for our neighborhood. I plan on attending the next city council meeting when this will be discussed. If you have any questions , please feel free to call me at 892-8216 . Sincerely, Dave Harris , A concerned citizen 2 City of Huntin ton Beach 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Building 536-5241 Planning 536-5271 July 7, 1995 Mr. Dave Harris 15422 Victoria Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92647 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 14990/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 93-33 Dear Mr. Harris: This letter responds to your letter dated June 16, 1995 to Councilmembers Bauer and Sullivan concerning your opposition to the Planning Commission's conditional approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 14990 and Conditional Use Permit No. 94-26. The approved project consists of a 58 unit planned unit development on reduced size lots at the closed Gill School site. The development of the tract is contingent on the City Council's approval of Zone Change No. 94-4 to rezone the property from PS (Public Semipublic)to RL (Residential Low Density). In your letter, you contend that the proposed tract should not consist of any lot smaller than 6000 square feet in order to be compatible with the neighborhood. Along with Commissioners Kerins and Biddle, I understand and respect your position on this issue. However, based on the Westminster School District's entire proposal, and the fact that the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance allows for reduced lot sizes, staff supported the overall project. With larger parcels proposed along the perimeter of the tract, compliance with the infill lot standards, and increased building setbacks from existing residences, the project would not adversely impact the existing single family residences adjacent to the project site, nor result in a negative impact to the surrounding neighborhood. You should be aware that this approval does not necessarily set a precedent for staff recommendations or Planning Commission actions on future projects. Every project is unique and is analyzed by staff on a case by case basis. In addition, every commissioner understands their role in the discretionary review process for each project that comes before them. If you should have any further questions, feel free to call Wayne Carvalho of my staff or me at (714) 536-5271. + Sincer ly, Mel S. Fallon Community Development Director . c atltr 1499Oml . MSF:WC cc: Honorable Mayor Victor Leipzig Councilmembers Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator RECEIVED FROM Y AND MADE A PART OF THECORD AT 'THE COUNCIL MEETING OF�RE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CON,NIE BROOKWAY,CITY CLERK ATTN; H.B.CITY CLERK - CONNIE BROCKWAY FROM; Virginia Lewis SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL ACTION ON GILL SCHOOL CLOSING DATE; August 7, 1995 It is respectfully requested that the attached six-page writing be recorded as part of the public record concerning the subject matter. This writing has been previously furnished to the mayor and to council members. Please note corrections of typographical errors and word omissions are reflected on: page 1 - paragraph 2 - line 1 page 2 - section 1 - line 12 page 2 - section 3 - line 1 page 4 - paragraph 2 - line 6 page 5 - paragraph 4 - line 4 The concerns, as I have expressed, remain the same. I am advised that it is within the power of the council to reconsider the zoning action for further review and collection of all the facts. V v r TO: HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBER SUBJECT: COUNCIL ACTION 7/17/95 CONCERNING GILL SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT DATE: July 29, 1995 The purpose of this writing is to formally enlist the Huntington Beach City Council to reconsider any further zoning action on August 7th, concerning the closed Gill School site. I feel that I must exercise my prerogative to: speak out clarifying mis-representation, correcting mis-statements, etc. as it concerns the subject matter. My knowledge of the Goldenwest Estates starts with the year 1962, when I became a first time homeowner. It is recognized that the council has the mandate to vote and make decisions for the welfare of Huntington Beach citizens. It follows that when the council makes these decisions they are entitled to the correct and ALL of the facts and thereby are able to make informed decisions. My purpose in writing this letter is to offer some salient points and to address items that are not facts. 1. I was never made aware of any public hearings on the subject matter until 7-15-95. I attended the 7-17-95 council meeting. 2. Resulting from my initiated call, following the 7- 17-95 meeting, to the city attorney's office. I ended up being connected to an assistant planner. I believe his name to be Mr. Carvalho. We discussed the 300 ft. radius required public hearing notice. He concurred agreement with my comment, "that's not very far. " He further said sometimes they extend further. In response to my further comment he suggested that I could look in the newspaper for publication of legal hearings. There was no suggestion as to which newspaper I might read. 3 . The homeowners association does not represent me or many hundreds of other residents. The association president stated that they gave notice of the public hearings to their dues paying members. Such total membership is estimated to be 120. Cutting the number of 120 in half/ we are talking 60 households. We have 565 homes in our total development. In doubling this number there 1 is a possible total voting adults of 1130. Does 120 members equate as a representative group of 1130, having a vested interest in what goes on at the Gill School site? Mr. Robert Sternberg (a vice president) appeared at the council meeting on behalf of the Neighborhood Association. In response to a council members question as to who was notified Mr. Sternberg held up a newsletter. This newsletter is printed quarterly. Obviously not timely enough to meet public hearings deadlines or meetings. It is NOT within the newsletter format offering any news of an upcoming formal meeting dates, times, and places to appear. THINK OF IT• a) The planning department says I didn't live close enough to be notified; b) the neighborhood association purporting to be acting on the residents behalf, as my representative acknowledged their action taken of notice and purpose not to notify me; c) A council member saw fit at the 7-17-95 council meeting to lecture and chastise those of us present that we didn't do it right. We should have followed the rules. LEST I FORGET: a) I am informed that the association treasurer (Glaser) does not reside in our tract. I believe that excludes her vote. b) Association Vice President Sternberg is rumored that his house is for sale. c) Why would the association leaders show ANY vested interest as it relates to what happens at Gill School and to those residents who are left behind? WHO'S IN CHARGE? How does the city ordinance apply? What comes first? I'm reminded of my numerous times (in the early days) of many hours, I spent at the City Council Meetings, Planning Commission Meetings, Parks and Recreation Meetings, etc. a) The city Ordinance says that the City Council has jurisdiction on ALL zone changes. b) The City Council has domain over the Negative declaration Item #94-14. c) The council members first action is to hear and 2 rule on zone changes - after which a developer seeks variances (lot sizes, setbacks, etc. ) . Such was not the case at the 7-17-95 council meeting. The process was reversed and this appeared to trigger action of a lawsuit concern of council members. In view of the circumstances, it certainly can be concluded that the planning commission action was in reverse of proper order. Any such possible legal action certainly could be thought of as directed toward the Planning Commission and Staff Members. I repeat, Who is in charge, the council or the planning commission? Then of course the council could have taken action to table or postpone. Negative Declaration 94-14 I am reminded that the Council has domain on this action.I have checked with others. There is consensus that the council held no discussion at the 7-17-95 meeting on this Negative Declaration. What happened? Is there a legality question here? Points of Concern - re: Negative Declaration 94-14 a) Reference Page 7. Item 13b says no to demand for off site parking. Isn't this in conflict with Planning 7- 13-95 staff report - page 4. Under section 231.04 third column "there will be on street parking spaces available. " Somebody needs to explain this to me. b) Explanation is also needed in reference to Item 21. a yes answer would be more appropriate to these items 21c and 21d. c) PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND REVIEW . . . Response to comments says this was prepared based on information supplied by December 20, 1994. Throughout these paragraphs of comments mention is made that individuals writings were received. There is a section referenced as a 20 day public participation beginning on December 1, 1994. Is there a legal notification requirement of these homeowners to be affected? Who are the individuals that were contacted? LETS GO TO THE GREER PARK SUBJECT! Having lived across the street from Greer Park, I am very much aware of park going's on. This park is 6.96 acres. At least one third of the space taken up by a baseball park (used by adults only) . Almost daily a 3 crew comes to prepare the field for the adult games. As stipulated by the crew no youth or young children are to step into the diamond area. ALL trash cans (Greer Park north end) are removed. We're told they were removed because of toxic waste (oil cans, used oil, etc. ) being dumped into the trash cans. Apartment dwellers parking on Brunswick drive (Greer Park North Boundary Street) doing mechanical work (sometimes for extended time periods) on jacked up cars which are regularly parked on the street (South side of Brunswick Drive) . Since the removal (of the trash cans) homeowners across the street are subject to cleaning up (blown across the street) paper litter strewn on the Greer Park boundary boulevards. Obviously, the increase in scattered litter is due to the removal of the trash cans. Those of us whose homes border the park boundaries live directly across from the park and daily live with the consequences of an ILL FATED development. This was brought on by city council action whose members were then uninformed. (Here we go again! ) Reference here is made to the apartment development facing Goldenwest Street with Greer Park situated as the apartment dwellers backyard. Over the years the police blotters should be full and will tell many stories about events of these apartments. There has been numerous changes in ownership, continual changes in management. It has become common knowledge that 3 & 4 families occupy one single apartment. Drug dealers are known to dwell and hang out there. The police blotters should also be full of the goings on in Greer Park. The park is not safe. Police helicopters are frequently called out. Police cars are frequently seen cruising the park. Police cars are often visible driving into the park grounds. A very nice new restroom building and water fountains, etc. were removed by the city crew due to excessive park vandalism. No responsible adult considers the park safe. Early morning walkers witness evidence of night sleepers, abandoned furniture, etc. Will there be restrooms re-installed with the $175,000.00 amenity? The underground plumbing should still be there. So, what's the answer? Could the city afford to assign a park overseer or caretaker? Is there a community volunteer group interested in preserving park developments? Does spending $175,000.00 for new equipment provide any solution? I am confused. Gill School was deemed to have a lack of students residing in the Goldenwest Estates Development. Thus elementary 4 students were directed to attendance at Schroeder School (West of our development) . It seems fair to conclude that very few elementary school children live in the Goldenwest Estates tract. We're expected to believe that the proposed spending of $175,000.00 is ALL a plus. Consideration must be given to the current aforementioned facts. Considering the small number of children in our tract, shouldn't we focus on how many current and future tract toddlers - elementary school children - will benefit from the installation of new equipment when the park is not safe for them to play there now? Regional picnicking in Greer Park is not satisfactory. Parking is such a hig big big problem. A neighborhood nuisance is created as picnickers find it necessary to park in neighborhood residential areas. Perhaps some improvements of setting aside a cluster of tables along with a large barbecue/fireplace to accommodate group cooking, etc. Look for ways to provide off street parking. Not that any expenditure of $175,000.00 to improve things in the park is out of order. Let's just be practical and spend the money for the greater need and the greater benefit. More input from tract/homeowner residents is definitely needed before any park improvement goes forward. Future closed school site development The City Council must consider immediate action to require a much broader coverage when notifying of public hearings concerning closed school site development. Let's face it, sending notices to homeowners within a 300ft. radius in the Gill School incident covered about 75 to 100 homes. This is a very small percentage of 565 homes. Since we did vote to pay taxes to build the school. Are we not then entitled or interested or have the right to say in what happens in our neighborhood? A newly adopted ordinance should require hearing notices to ALL homeowners within the original tract boundaries. Goldenwest Estates tract maps, in my possession, set the record straight. Be assured once and for all that our original development lot sizes are no less than 6000 square feet. Numerous lots range form 6400-7000 square feet. THIS IS A FACT, NOT A GUESS. Also, who can explain? Why does the Bushard school closing containing one more acre larger than the Gill School site be approved at 58 units, while 58 units are planned for a smaller 5 i acreage? Is there a trade off with the developer? One wonders. How does environmental impact apply in this case? 58 units on a 9.68 acre plot is not comparable to 58 units on a 8.82 acre plot. Perhaps by now the reader has decided to tune me out. I hope not. I do apologize for this lengthy writing. I write as a many years (thirty-four) Goldenwest tract residents. My experience over the years has been varied. My early continued interest in the city of Huntington Beach has never waned. It is my sincere belief that any City Council (our elected representatives) has primary responsibility to its citizens. By the same token that same body can only make decisions based on accurate information and the facts as presented. In this instance the Planning Commission (those who are not elected officials) seem to be running a show which is not essentially factual nor advisable as to the best move for the Goldenwest Estates. We as Huntington Beach citizens have no recourse or say of who serves on the planning commission. We are subject to their will. We can't vote them out. It is respectfully requested that the Council take action on August 7th (as prior to) to re-consider the action on 7-17-95 taken. Thank you for your kindness and taking the time to consider to my words which are honestly stated, and to considering this request. Sincerely, Virginia L. Lewis 6931 Brunswick Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92647 (714) 897-4507 P.S. For whatever its worth - I have had occasion to vote for 5 of the current council members and I do not make my voting decisions lightly. 6