The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutZone Change Cases - 1962-1963 - ZC 283 - ZC 284 - ZC 285 - Z Affk4avit ct Publication State of California County of Orange' ss CIty of Huntington Beach .T. S. Farquhar, being duly sworn on oath, says: Thar lie is a tizen of the United Slates, over the a_e of twenty-one years. tPsit�i.s F Citizen •• t bets�.$st�tiatJ) n $anr.t liar a �:cy: TT -19fkt -That he Is the printer and publisher of the Huntington Beach �so7icl+ 't3� urn;' n:S7F: r' !sumNd , News, a weekly nowspaper of general eirculatlon printed, published `ZONE o�•'E;s`o ''•2 110:let.,IS RE,.M31.0�U and cht-uluted in the :-aid County of Orange and .elsewhere and pie a_a less' wriA ;':bs n•:: b 11�a i!y published for the dissen:it,atlon of local and other newsy of a general X S ;L'W-i6l a1,the-,Ct,Y..I.1:vel.t:,.lun character, and hue, a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, �(4;the cburi�it C!�acs+� 3i lt'e zoo 1tlll and said paper has been established. printed and published in tie- ar •the Stat:; of California, and County of Orange, for at least one year next at w740 s';tli.ek;?.H_,':or- a� s�oit t before the publication of the first insertion'of this notice; and the are ait r.:aa .pe"Iblo;-on'',mrn*'aY; .1-4 said ncwspar r is not dr:,oted to the interest of, or published for the `�d,3a7 o1;.DecenSar, 19u3j_-far.th..'.pur. paao of consider n a _r.'a tea fee,a cisa�� eatertainnient of any particular class, profession, trade, calling, race ' . inn»: f:out n�i x C.s��rst!-:1i�ri�cuitu=at j of uenominaticn, or any ntunber thereof. �lelrlcf a ':adopta3,bt'IrtertrF 0:�lia^,!o. Ncr`_t 5a to:T ! .pia 'a;'F'atattY Fiq.td.tl;ca ti The Huntington Beach News wiv; udludi -ed a legal newspaper UW19c ;wrulitpla aa�i�ly 3 of general circulation'ley Judge G. K. Scovel in the Supr;lor Court .A.,f�rnr�;"tis.t". . an i;;i~ 2 core:;�+itr of Orange County, CaliforniwAulut 27th, 1937 by order No. A-393L Auit`riaa� 3t�IrFct;. wt,ls_:,�u:tis k � yl.� cioax 'Located.saulh`ol Mnger Rvpcuo east �.., t;t.;Spc3n�dwe_..wtrvst:cld_;u7tli cf That the _NOTICZ OF USE.- DISTRI'ltt HEARING hv�aua z_; �pcl�7 3ea;rtb`ad R� !ot-{ inns: •- .: i n1l N 195 its o: tsto WV2 ZON�C 0 - o[: thg_"KWt/i .zt oration i ? of which the annexed Is a printed copy, was published In said news- _zi-5.2s'sDf1,�`_�S ezct►pi� j tha:_N,hZF;_it ihvrao!'.:. sr Aroma il� IS }1'6ats ,, tffau�rb�3Q4,.Ta~t paper at. least One Issue '__ 'iatlyii Trcct 21v_ 4133.;` Area 11I,',tC-2)'t of .90.5 ' 7'a:itat;re. Traet� � d commencing from the 22n day t?f November kIL ltiter�etnstTyersuns_ cry tnr"od��:ta 6fl.nd aald h+�rEli atta •xpte.i__t6ait 19 62 22nd jy� ?8mbe1+ ariti.;ons for ur azslnit the:�rspesed anti ending on the Clay of rb,;;vd - F'urtl,er-_Info-Inallor ma, .ba ahtain►3 62 Irr;:n 19_____, Muth clays inclusive, .uui as often during said period and ;- ;p'pg.HtINTI2lCtt3'J•SEAc:H- times of publication as said paper was regularly issued, and in the ,Ep: PRlJI:"C -)OtiEs:-:� regular and entire Issue of said newvipaper pm.,,ir, and not in a C!�• .Mark', suppiement, and said noilce was published tncreln on the following - bates, to-wit: November 220 1962 _ �_ , /, cut. .�.��.t✓2-- C G Publisher Subscribed and sworn to before me this �`�''�� day of Z Notary Public THOMAS D. %.V'(.:` orange County, California My Commission E.:„;-.s :.e 13, 1956 i i �r �y Huntington Beach Planning Com.rin'ssion a-- -. P. o. Bo: 190 City Hnii 40 k� Huntington Brach, California �•- y �aUHTY �►P,' _,,r 'r' , December 4" , 1962 L E T T E R O F T R A N S M I T T A L T0: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL, City of Huntington Beach , Calif . ATTO: Doyle Miller, City Administrator RE : RESOLUTION NO 283, a resolution of the City Planning Commission Yeco=,�nding approval of a portion of zone case 283 and further recommending denial of a portion of Zone Case 283. Gentlemen: Transmitted hereulth is a copy of Resolution. No 283 , a resolut:: in of the CLty Planning Commission, recommending approval of a portion if Zone Case 283 ar.d further recommcnding denial of a portion of Zone Case 283. This case is divided into three requests and involves changing the zene on 71.41 acres of land. Th=- existing zoning of the property is j Al-:,( General Agricultural. Dist::iet as adopted by Interim Ordinance No 668 . The three requests are as follows : C 1. The property located at the northe ,st corner of Heil Avenue and Spri.rgdalLe Street known as Lot 305 of Tentative Tract 43335 is proposed to be cha.rtged to C-2 Community Business District with setback provisiexis . 2; The remainder of Tentative Tract 4333 is proposed to be changed to R-1 Single Family Residence District . 3. The property situated 520 feet east of Springdale Street on the south side of Edinger Avev-.xe and consisting of approximately 9 acres is proposed to be .hanged to R-3 Limited multiple gamily Residence District. The entire area proposed to be rezoned is Located south of Edinger Avenue. north of- Heil Avenue, and extending east of Sprin dale Street for 1320 feet , and consists of 71.41 ,acres . Thf_ precise legal description is attached, The City Planning Commission ::eld a public hearing on the matter on November 6, 1962, at which= time- a representative of the applicant explained the proposal. Z*C. *9,(?3 Letter of Transmittal ; 2/3/62 Resolution No 263 By unanimous vote of the Planning Commission, the requests for R-1 and R-3 are recommended for approval, but- the requested C-2 'Zone at Springdale and Heil is recommended for denial . The Code provides that a public hearing, shall be held on the matter after which an ordinance may be adopted effecting the change or it may i be denied . Respectfully submitted, W. C. Warner Planning Director and Secretary WCW: lb Encl; ;legal Description Resolution No 283 � I f i 1 ~ i RESOLUTION NO 283 2 RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION 4 OF THE CITY OF 1WNTI NGTON BEACH, CAhIFORNIA, RECOMKENDING APPROVAL OF A PORTION OF ZONE 5 CASE 283 AND FURTHER RECOMHENDING OENI11 OF A PORTION OF ZONE CASE 2834 s WHEREAS, The City Flaming Commission of the City of 8 lHuntington beach, California, has held one public hearing in .4 Nompliance with the State Government Code in order to consider 10 11 and re-,Aevy Zone Ceze 283, and 121 AREAS, The City Planning Cammivaion, on the basis of land use surveys, Master Plan of Arterial Highways, exietbng 13 14 zoning and consideration given to tl�e general public, does dete=ine that the property outlined for a change of zone to 1�3 { R-1 Single Family Residence District and R-y Limited Multiple I6 Family Residence District does meet the criterir. deered 17 18 necessary to establish an R-1 zone and an R-3 zone and does determine that the property outlined for a change of zone to 19 20 -2 Community Business District dues not meet the criteria 21 deemed necessary to establish a C-2 zone . 22 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, 23 action 1. That the City Planning Commission, ae a result of study and consideration, concludes that: 24 +tl R--1 Single Family R s side c e D13�riCi The property ouined for a change a•6 zone does 25 meet the - criteria deauted necessary► to estAl;sh 28 a R-1 District- for the folloving reasons: 27 1• There is an approved tentative tract map on the subject property that has been de. 28 signed for single family resi0e tial ce development . 29 2. The rezoning of the property will eliminate uses tbat are not cMati.ble with t single family residential -development • Fte luti.on No 283 B. The property outl:.ned for a ehan g7- of zone te) 2 R.3 Limited Multipl:� Family Resia;nce District dons meet the criteria deerwd necessary to establish an R-3 zone for the following reasons 4 1. The Pro Used an sed ze change will provide for a trans tion from co=ercial to single 5 family residential. 6 2. The prop,-rty is adcent to a primary high- way and cast of another primry highu-ay 7 which will provide easy accessibility for a high Lensity development . 8 C. The property outlined for a thane of zone to 9 C-2 Community Business District does not meet the criteria deem~d necessary to establish i to C-2 Dbetrict for the following reasons ; 11 1. The property- is situated at the one-half mile intersection which is not the proper 12 location and is u-necessary to serve the . � area. 13 2. Chanms of zone on two other cc rners of 14 the intersection have previously been denied. 15 16 Section 2. That the City Planni n; Commission recov-azenda approval of a poLtion of Zone ease 283 and further 17 18 recomends denial of a portion of Zone Case 283 to 19 the City Council. 20 Sfidtiun 3. The Secretary shall certify and attest to the 21 adoption of this resolution by the members of the 22 City Plan3nina Coommission. 23 REGULARLY PASSED AND ADOPTED, by the City Planning Com- mission o� the City of Huntington Beach, California, an the 2_4 5th day of November, 1962, by the following 25 2f3 ROLL CALL VOTE: OT'E 27 A'iES : Letson, Bazil, Miller,, Worthy, Kaufmn, Chairman Siang. 28 Z3OES: None. 29 ABSENT; Crabb THE P.ESOLUTION WA ADOPTE.D. « 2 F olution No 233 3 2 3 4 ATTEST: 5 6 7 s 717 77 0-a-r- ner, EdwardS ranz Secretary Chairman 9 10 lI 12 13 I 14 15 , 18 '� 17 1L� 19 20 f- ul 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Spa �� S �:. .!r ' `• e [ ., ; _ !� _ 1 � i =: _. t j ' ', ~ , - ZONE, E O ' 33 beir- A. c. ">= ._t.� r .fun�...Lr ? 'J t j�:i'.�2Z. :i ,i♦�� t� 1 .` , ��,� V •n r ' �Z.^ r•1 f 1"s 7 lt• ,e- r- *) -� i. ►l..rZ, .�.'� �'��.. i4. f � � � r�T- ., on ; Z.E��'�.�.r ri the tii�� t1P- iJ J 3.11JL: ' '.J� ._or 1-:i Lin�.�li�� r �+�;�, f f��?.�..1l a� l7L�. �.Y.�{h'.'. C�>• J ) ♦ Y• q �_ }�;=.,�='JEj ter !•w`j'tr, L: :�. r,.� •a+. f]Y"t�lv�rc�_ 1'•+7� i.t�E}.�.�. 3 �� . �{t.•�"7�J..L:i �3l—�»��.�y�\4�.i� r��.tl ►?{v CJ �.,.L ��•'—i_ .j�.31rj�.Ci S.,:it��.7 �• � �`� f.t �..�. .`^''. V.1.7'•..�.._�.."._ C.�•..• ! �.C:1.tL�' .� L!�?t c��.U.! � i :i. �� ....t�3 1 ai�C: .r.i.•. i-�.s.l,. ct._r, --L t.�:.11::.i�L�i1=.�y !)' :;.A z. -.wj *ripF? t :3 =!: C:f.'��'>"=.11• !7 :i_=Ls'_ 'is,e�c�3 ' 1 L•tlC.V'..:r�: riC—Lh •�f ,�S..La�'..•f. >> . •....r:w?'L ca!3 L.'... ►��f�...C1rjJt;.�_ .: �l -�"�f.�Jv. .�!�.;� .norr � 01. is A. !1�'v�� ?•7� �� .F.��rc �e� �:L��r"=C ~� L�% T.�i:.� • 1. 4 J v s ' ✓�. S :.S �..'v:.. ..�. !t �t^•.fi.f �:f.Ji..,ni �. Lt��i.J; � �;� �i1_)••r,s S'�:t3i+.L��-ti.�, 1.Z.C3�.. :E'.� ��K a {.i• .7._:It.t_.'}.�::;i :Wit:; j�L`'7�::�1i�� isF.' ;�•:.i !_t,?c4 co at..r?nc' :?a._Lr_ t;e::-t...!.1`" :J ` yL:'r��s< 4t:; 4SE G� R:=-1��-y�7 May ba. {;•i1.r::y?��,.�;:t x L:♦i!1 I-FZl� P w ?' i � .�T �'�—�r::`l Lit': 0 f i::.�.;:� . ♦7 7iCop i� i� �•33.4c� L��i �l,~�• �I� .j::�-.�';��._� �.�jl�l,. J J i "L,:�;r,��a79's�c:r•`- - -'�' �-.._...-_.ate, r.___'._ --- - •_._ _.._.. . - - -- .. Affidavit. Publication State of.Callf6rnla . County of Orange ss City-of Huntington Beach J. S. Farquhar, being duly sworn on oath, says; That he Is a citizen of the United `� 'Starts, OV@T th.. age of twenty-one years. i}'rib]3ahid`ftiinliaq.o�:8.aeb-:?iewe;�Nov. That he is the pr=,iter and publisher of the Huntington Beach ��+S�Y1CC far vrz D1ff, R1 M`tp1111W News, to weekly newspaper of general circulation printed, published ,'zoxt::�sr •a.';:�; ;: � and circulated in the said County of Orange and elsewhes.: and �-". NarrcE is xi:ps:sr GIVL�t.:oat c pv:s=. published for the dis,emination of local and other news of a genera! 4`tic;-kuasinQ. +.i[t:z �`t►:td b : tk�':"Cit7 }G.t►iusli ;�f._ape Cttp pt ;3aentt�l4a.Srcctt character, and ltas a bona fide subscription list of"paying subscr-fibers, :- Jfsf tt;r Gtun.11 ..hrcrtxs'"a! Sha;;CStyr Hri{. and said paper has been established- printed and published in the Ku kttia{d-r 33va�>=, Cc ng,*Fnlit State of California' and County of Orange, for at least one year next :boar Qt :afl. a��o3�. piss., cr a:."stryn before the publieniion'of the first insertion`of this not.lcc; and the t>yer.atte�. a, p�s�k.•,-.emu t9an. ,<-tb� said newspaper Is not devoted to the interest of, or Published for the Es=3sdap o! t� �►c, t4ifz, .[�:,ibe" _ entertalament of any particular class, profession. trade, calling, race r�s; nt - a ildrrtng aFc:tit0•.�i:it-a t4tpnc� or denomination,'or any number thereof. dtj- prcpate-.d�chauYw of ail WC aiiisul`3q-u i The Huntington Beach News was adjudicated a legal newspaper , to I ntilQtsvaa i" n e viol'"Di:= of general circulation by Judge G. IC Scovel in the Superior Court ;tint v�tt3i'�aabcck �+toviftoni•=on-�r�s.+::; of Orange County, California august 27th;'1937 by order No. A-593L" •• atsr.d„a�rt3�sct'ca fettcw: 7.00¢tOtt Cf';;t;1i�:xC'elufWlst f'orrlrt,-: .;a� .3`tt'a@dd�s:'Avanue '`xiu! 'iets�ord��;; That the NOTICE OF, USE -DISTRICT HEARING �'s`o°tt�aA�itnp Lo,' - ZONE CASE ISO. 28�+ xtt tys Tost aC i irazns t.3s:;usv,ri3 x .xttond•=said br�naQ and s fasis •;ti,rt of which the annexed is a printed copy. was'published in said newt- ootntvns [or o',:a�it:aat;piu�saa�d ch•u,�o;`. Furtbr: idGraiQtion One Issue: frc , off[ce at, ,t�:6'`C1�y , v►k ' ; sger at least ytT' 'Ot'�IitS1t'ftHGTox'�tACtt--., S Y: AJll3L ja�rt=s commencing from il-.e 22nd day of November ? Z.11. )rrk 19 E z., and ending on t.ite 22nd day of_.V oyember is d2_. both days inclusive, and as often during said period and times of publication as said paper was revularly Issued, and in the regular and entire issue of said newspaper proper, and not in a supplement, and said notice was published therein on the following dat--s, to-wlt: November 22, 1962 l , //- PubU9her Subscribed and sworn to before me this �3�i�r day cf r" • Notary Public THC)MAS D. 1NYLL Orange County, California MoTAtty puatic, CAI-Ir- My Commission Expire:; Sept. 13, 1966 2 �� t 4 . i ' 7 f; . �t� i1X13 `•OnO�rnMSS1Q1 _ Huntington Beach. g .:. P. o. Box 190 clty Halt Huntington Beach, California Deceuiber 39 1962 L E T T E R O F T R A N S M I T T A L TO: HONO7'%.kBLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL, City of Huntington Beach, Calif . ATTN: Doyle Miller, City Administrator RE: RESOLUTION_ NC 284, a resolution of the City Planning Commission rec_ommendin, denial of Zone Case 284. Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith is a copy of Resolution No 284, a resolution of the City Planning Commission, "recommend ng denial of "'Zone Cage 284. This cage proposes to change the zone on property situated at the sou::hviast corner. of McFadden Avenue and Edwards Street from R-1 Single Family Residence District ` to C-4 Highway Commercial District with setback prow sions The City Planning Commission held a public hearing on the matter on November b, 1962, at which time there gore two persons who spoke in favor of the proposal and a representative for the applicant who ex- plained the proposal. A previous zone case proposing an R-3 Limited Multiple--Family .Residence District .was applied for by the applicant and denied because of its incoun-llppat,ibility= with- the si.ngk- f amily resi - dences in thearea, Lased on the action of the prior zone change , the Commission informed the residents of the surrounding area that apartments are permitted - in .-the C-4 district , . It was then agreed that commercial uses would not be objectionable but apartments would:-,be. It was further a reed that the Commission would recommend<Aerial".of the C-4 request ang waive the filing fees for the applieant'=.if he applied for a C-2 zone which permits the same. com- mercial uses and eliminates any apartments . By unanimous vote of the City planning Commission, Zone Case 284 was denied and recommended to your Honorable Body for denial. If the City Council concurs with the Planning Commission' s recommendation, the Code provides that the petition may be denied by the Council with- out holding a public hearing Respectfully submitted, VIN: lb W. C. garner Enci : Resolution No 284 Planning Director and Secretary Legal Description 1 I RESOLUTION NO 784 2 RESOLUrION (T RECCMMMATION 3 A fIESO' UTION OF THE CITY PUNNUNG COMMISSION 4 OF THE CITY OF MUINGTON BEACHO CALIFORNIA, RECOW-VENDING DEWIAL OF ZONE CASE 284. 5 8 TW7E EltiS, The City Planning Commission of the City if Hiu itington Beach, California, has held one public hearing in s compliance with the State Goverment Cods in order to consider 9 and review Zane Case 284, and 10 IHER,EM t The City Planning Commission, on the basis of 11 land use surveys,, existing zoning, and consideration gi~ven i2 to the general public, does determine that the property out. JL lined for a change of zone to C-4 Highway Commercial District 14 j dous not meet the criteria deemed necessary to establish a 15 C-4 zone, 13 II NOW TBERUORE BE IT RESOLVED, Section 1, Thai: the City Planning Cc ission, as a result 19 19 of study and consideration, concludes tizat the applicant ' s request for a change of zone does rLrjt 20 - 21 meet the criteria deemed neceseary co establish 2.0 a C-4 Highway Commercial District for the fol. 23 lowing reason. 1. All of the uses pormi.tted in the C-4 zone 24 would not be compatible with the surroundiaig single family development 'and a more restric.. 25 tive zone could possibly be applied to the 26 1 property. 2? Section 2. That the City Planning Commission recommends denies 40 i 28 of Zone Case 284 to the City Council. 29 • Re*xa ion No 284 I 2 Section 3. The Recrefary shall certify and attest tc the 3 adoption- of 4 n adoptio of this resolution by the members of s the City Flat ing, Commis,.4ion. .REGULARLY PASSED .AND ADOPTED0 by -he City Planning Cam- mission of the City of Iivatington Beach, Califo-.nia , on the r a 6th day of November, 1962, by the foMjvring 9 ROLL CALL VOTE: 10 AYES: Letson, Bazils Miller, Worthy, Ksufoan, Chairman Stang, 13 NOES : None, 12 ABSENT: Grabb, 13 THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. 14 15 ATTEST: 16 17 We G, Warner rd Stan* 18 Setrretary . C:hz.irznan 19 20 21 I 22 - ! 23 24 I { 25 28 27 2� 29 t � w r • Affidavit Pubfication State of California County of Orange cs City of Huntington Beach J. S. Farcluhtir, being duly sworn on oath, says: That he i, a ---,----- rlti.'.en of the United State,-, over the ttgc, of twenly-one yi-an;. 1 sl�Itbiisr�+l: 'Iktttl*9tCA t3R9:I1- t1i* e' TIw, t l�rill T;,at he is thr, printer and purAlsher of the Ilunt"iglon Burl:h ; NOTICC or . Ilx>r -,visi'film •1n. 'A I I G j News, a weelciv newspaper of general c!rc:uiatiott printed, published ZONE ;CAss U0. :ltz and circulated in the said County of Orange and elsewhere and NOTICE is HEP.EBY. GIVEN 1h,;l a..ustb- published for the dissemination of local anti ;,the: news of a general Ile hvsr:rq -Will. ,bf. herd -by .the, CI:y clutrlletc:r, ttst+l ltus :! Lun;t fldr :itill;;erlhtlr,n {ist of 1!m'n}; :c1l{i:1c:rlhers, l Cnut;cil:af i;te City,o) :3u:il�s► tc i;ls�och.: 1111d Sitid IONI '[' 11115 IA-t-11 titizhh:hvd, prinivil ttl,ti putillr11r11 In the ' :n•llr� s;cnt: 11. �:i:�,•nli«r-i,( tt�:r,CI;1;is:r?!, I State' of C:alitol'ttia, i:Ild Cotltlty of l "ange, for at least oil.^, yietir Ile:,t Ici:rtil:et�tdt :Io7[lt; t;RW.ra,4701, t't t1tR '.1- ) df.7:.(1 �'eturl 7: .- er ad-icon .:lss gl:f;er� before the lluNiention of the Iirst insertion of this notice; a:sd the as: 'as gouifay.1he 3rd stay :ct' said newspaper is not devoted to the interest of, or published for the (}�cersLet,- f'r_, to ,L-*-,rt,:.;.;�a of cat+-! � entertaillmerit of any particular gins`-, profe:-zion, trade, calling, race � sider.aq a petttioa to a en-nve oi.saaa , or denomination, or any nuIllt;X the riot, i trans: R:-Y Cubwi wan BaRld'onilal Z3�z—le { ys odnpi*d.•h? Inlarii-a Ordinance No.'G12 The Iiuntingion Bead: 4 ev.s way adjudic:i;ed a local newspaper of general circulation by Ju(lbv G. K. Scove! in trio Superior Court prepr;q lruz.!i- - of Orange County, Californin Aubist 27th, I:);;; uy order No. A-5031. aa'-=rit d �r 121tor.-, .. of Adar.:s Avenurr ard.Cainoir7 Sues! and as Is.t-No. '33. That rite NSLT.Z , Q.'__1 SFL_N5_T1tST_ Tract..Va. g33a, W1111uason Park Co. rill 11tsrestnd pe:aoas are - . invited `a: ZOIN CASE pE NO 285 ;attend ; eafd ha- as ard.. sxpr�sa 1.�.s Vri�7 lY • _ Gtr • oplaloas, tat n: affairs! chi praposod rhrsdQ�. of which the aniwxtd is a printed copy, was published in said nevvs- Ft:r!h ln!:rr.+7llzt may h. .obtain rj Irani -1h4 at:rye of thr City Clerk..` I[�}g C; T .Cr I;Ui1TTIHGION 11CA'iCd paper :,t Ic:tt:t — --Un-e----- �8_.� -- ----- : 9y-. PAUL C. catrmencin; fru:n the 22nd oily of,November 1962 and ending on tiie _2?_nd clay of November 39 62 both days inclusive. and as ol'on during said period and times of publication as said paper was regularly issued, and in the regular and entire issue of sidd newspaper proper, and not in a supplement, and said notice was published therein on the following dates, to-wit.: November 22 t; 1 2 Publisher j Subscrilted ct..1 sworn to before me this 2`3 O flay OL �'"t'�'i-r2r •'�� ° Notary Public TNL'Ri: D. 'r'i i t_; �� Orange County, California t. NOTARY r'�tiE.l::, - My - My Commission E';.;r" Sept. 13, 1966 g� 1 sHuntington Bead. Planning Commission P. O. Bo„ 190 City Hail is0lj• ic Huntington Beach, ialifornia December 3 1962 L E T T E R 0 F T R A N S M I T T A L I TO : HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL, City of Huntington Beach , Calif . ATTN: Doyle Mil i:r, City Administrator � i RE : RESOLUTION NO 285 , a resolution of the City Planning Cc=ission recommending approval of Zone Case 285 . Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith , is a co of Resolution No 285, a resolution of n the City Planing Commission reconmrending appro�Ta' of ?ine Case 285 . This case proposes tc change the zone on property situated -,t the northwest corner of Adams avenue and Cannery Street from R-4---Y Suburban Residential District as adopted by Interim Ordinance No 672, to C-2 Community Business District with setback provisions . 'E The property consists of approximately seven acres of land and conforms to the standards the Planning Commission has set to establish a com- mercial district . The City Planning Commission held a public 'laring _on the matter on November 6, 1962, at which time one person appeared and expressed approval of the proposed change. By unanimous vote of the City Planning Commission, Zone Case 285 was approved and recommended to your Honorable 3ody for adoption, I The Code provides that a public hearingshall be bald on the tter after which an ordinance may be adapte r:.a effecting the change . Respectfully submitted , W. C. Warner i -Planning Director and Secretary i WCW.-l b Encl : Legal Description Resolution No 285 s �i I 2 RES!J LUTICN NO 285 3 RESOLUTION OF RECMISM-MAT ION 4 �1 RESOLUTION O THE CITY PLA.I`1I`I 14G C-;}i'i''IISjI JAI OF THE CITY GP HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALiPGERV•, 5 tRECGNISIEDIDING APPROVAL Cr ZCNE CASE 285 . 8 i 7 ME- IRE AS The City Planning Corte l-aian of the City Of 8 Huntington Beach, Califoxnla, has held one public hearing g I a compliance with the State Government Code in order to 10 consider and review Zone Case 285, and 11 UTMEREJ4S, The City PIP-nning Commission, on the basis of 12 land use surveys , Master. Plan of Land Use, t aster Plan of � 13 Arterial Highways, exi g stin zonina, and consideration given j v � 14 to the general public, does dete=ine that the property i5 outlined for a change of zone does Ensf ill tine critexni a Is deame� necessary for a C-.2 Co=..Punity Eupiness District . 17 NOW TIM- REFORE BE IT RESOLVED. i8 Section 1. That the City Planning Commiusion, as a result i 1Q of study and consideration, concludes that the 20 applicant ' s request for a change of zone to C.2 21 Community Eusine.,s Distr-ict with setback pro•- 22 visions does meet the criteria for a co=ercial i 23 development for the f ollo ing reasons: 24 1. The property is located at the intersection 25 of a Major and a Primary Arterial ? . The property is situated at the corner of a 2s section uhich is a more desirable location for co ercial zoning. 27 28 29 RescMtion No 285 Z 2 3. The proporty is within a proposed subdivision and is intended to provide 4 commercial devei- 3 opment to serve the needs of the people Lino -Will occup_tyt ak. subdivision as well as sur- rounding subdivisions. 5 Section 2. That the. Gity Piannina Commission recommends 3 approval of Zone Case 285 co the City Council. 7 Section 3. The Secretary shall certify and attest to the 8 adoption of this resolution by the members of 9 tic City Planning Commission 10 REGULARLY PASSES AND ADOPTED, by the City Planning; Com. 11 miasJ on of the City of 1. • tington Beach, California, on the 12 6ch day of November, 1962-, by the following 13 ROLL CALL VOTE: 14 AYES : Letson, Ha;il, Miller, Worthy, Kaufman, Gbairman Stang, 15 NOES' : None , lye ABSENT: Crabb. 17 THE RESOLUi iION WAS ADOPTED. 1 19 ATTEST: 20 21 22 C , a=er d ;and Stang 1I Secretary Chai=an 23 24 25 28 27 28 29 Affidavit Publication State of California t County of Orange' } ss City of Huntington Beach j 1 J. S. Farquhar, being duty sworn on oath, says: That lie Is a citizen of the United States, over the age of twenty-one years. ----- — - ----(PuUWL►hed 11untLngten Ir.ach New& 116:, . That lie is the printer uric] publisher of the Huntington Beach 0M) ! News, a weekly newspaper of general circulation printed, publishedHSSrFticf. .xtlinZ±�C.� Pub- and circulated In the :tali] County of Orange and �_lsewhere and -,Zol'�'� Gr.6` tIo �' I KJTiC' 15 11CRECY CI',l'h. :hc,t u Pub=' published for the dissemination. of local and other news of a general t,c hearing ,;�ai'..bc,ltels •�7-. ti;o Cily character, and has a Bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, Ccuscil of:tr�r, C!:r, ni 11,Mtin7iorJ t3_7 and said paper has been established, printed and published in the in'the counrtl Chcober of :he c;;r-aj:i, State of California, and County of Orange, for at least one year next Hun:irgton Brach;. Calilornta, ar,the:ia.r.,; before the publication of the lirst insertion of this notice; and the oI."7;30 .o c!x "P_Z,'., .o: ,as "un -.therl said rewspaper is not devotee] to the hu.er�est of. or published for the atc,r as.:yo><sibtw, oa Mandzy. _t*� •=rd; enterUdnmerit o[ any In class irofession, trade callin race tsef at DRt escbr-� 1a 2,:tar ii;r_pLr J l I S' ai .^.�tta3lcrisig rs pe!"lau for_;a• aGga or denomination, or any nuniLer theicui. Mole- t`,..xvn�-irorn ':R-S O a efa4tt..s, : t The Huntington Beach News wa:; i.djudicated a legal newspaper aU.:to 8-5 F';alecatorai, a of general circulation by Judge G. ,covel in the: Superior Court ;'erzk Ai,tnit,,:Gh prapbrty .£eIjaily ::�... of orange Cottrtty, C.thfornitt nu6'ust .;i it, 1'J37 by order No. A-5931. rri.'s'gtl, ati,:iaiicxa. PArd.L'I! Tha ealif 32V £t.' )c 4Ia.•it. 01 ilia'W4 0)t the.SCVMc_❑i NOTICE OF USE DISTRICT jM+ARING the: NV-'14 nt Chas )!V/,j' ric That the _ �� e�fion. 12 8.11 3ER .d . St PARCEL II Ths no0h .3tC'Et, r- 4.' "lt-, ZONE CASE NO. 2$6 ot:bib •wu. �: .th. s>rtl. Qll 1ho 1fEtCs:= 'at the of which the annexed is a printed copy. was published in said news- Secriurs.11-6-1i sE is 4&,Y._ � I5.1! intera�++i3 p-rs�r;s'c+e inrilal ie 7 a,!end- %aid Crar'rs nrSd ex rams- ti cif l n ti P paper at least one Issue apInlani' £or ' ar- against th'- projvulid'! -AhInga. rur:hsr Anknrrottar,'-m-sy b-. ob-; 22nd Nov6mber I rafned Irons tite`^tlicaCOR1menLing from tiie ( 0A '- CM-or-V.U11TINc lo;t.•BEnCH'. � BY: PAUL C. 1011LS i 1 19 62 and ending on the 22na t.._: ti November 19 62. both days Inclusive, and ,t:i U',cn during said period and { times of publication as said parer tea , regularly issued, and in the E regular and entire issue of said newspaper proper, and not In a supplement, and said notice was published therein on the following dates, to-wit: 4 Nnyember 22, 1962 _ Publisher i ESubscribed and sworn to before me this y-�-�-�� day of 19 i �i 2�ad-- �l �... Notary Public ' HO !�,S G. t.`�ri 1-i[� Or, County. California NOTAPY PtJ Ll:;,Co C.—if- , 2. C My mn:I:.:;1on Cx��itc: :�, I J 11966 i Huntington Beach Planning Commission P. O. Box 190 City Hall C•�f�.ieb9 `ic� Huntington Beach, California December 3 , 1962 L E i T R O F T R A N S M I T T A L TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL, City of Huntington Beach, Calif . ATT11: Doyle Miller, City Aciiwinistrator RE: RF 00LUTION NO 286, a resolution of the City Planning Commission recommending approval of Zone Case 286 Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith is a copy of Reesoluti.on No 286 , a resolution of the City Planning Commission, recommending approx-ai of Zone Case 286. This case proposes to change the zone on property consisting of approximately seven acres from R-.5-0 Profess ional, Motel, and Trailer Park District combined with oil production to R--S Professional, Motel, and Trailer Park District . The property is situated 200 feet west of Beach Boulevar, i and 250 feet north of Memphis Avenue. The precise legal is attached . The City Planning Commission held a public hearing on the matter on November 6, 1969., at which time there was one person present who spoke in f avor of the propels;1. By unanimous vote of the City Planning Commission, Zone Case 286 was approved and recommended to your Honorable Body for adoption. The Code provides that a public hearing shall be held on the matter after which an ordinance may be adopted effecting the change . E Respectfully submitted, W. C. Warner Planning Director and Secretary WCW: lb Encl: Legal description Resolution #286 f 1 RESOLUTION NO 286 2 RESOLUTION OF a,ECG1124r:1DATIOi�I 3 ;� _ ` .z IA RESOLUTION OF THE GITY PLANNI G COMI SSION 4 OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTO11 BEAM, G 1'AL1FOP.1,�A, RECOIL ENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CASE 236 , 5 6 WHEREAS. , The City Flaming Gamission of the City of 7 Huntin;ton Beach, CaliFo=in, has held one public tnarin; in 8 compliance with the State Govar=ant Code in order to con- 9 sider and review Lone Case 286s and 10 WHEREAS, The City Planning Commission, on the basis of 11 z2 land use surveys, s aster Plan of Land Use, existing zoning 13 and consideration 81ven to the general public, does determine 14 that the proparty outlined for a change of zone does fulfill M $ the criteria deemed necessary to create an R-5 Professional, 1B Motel and Trailer }ark Di str'•.ct and eliminate the oil drilli gy 3 pvovisions in the present district . 17 18 NOW TiMPLEF=ORE BE IT Rr50LVED, Is Section, 1. That the City Planning Commission, as a result 20 ref study and consideration, concludes that the 21 applicants requeat for a change of _one to R -5 l 22 does weer the criteria deemed necessary to el mi- 23 nate the oil drilling provision no provided in the existingR.R.-5-0 disc:ict for the following 24 reasons; 25 28 1. The one existing well within the area proposed 27 for change has been idle for somie time. 28 2 . Rewval of the 11011 designation could encourage 29 development of the land to a new and more use r y •, �� solution No 230' i 1 2 1 Section 2 . That 4he Choy Planning Gc=ission recommends appre- al � 3 of ::one Case 286 to the City Council. 4 Section 3 . The Secretary shall certify and att.est to Lhe 5 adoption of this resolution by the matmbers of II Q the City Pj anrAna Ccmzmissionz . 7 2EGUI ABLY PASSED AND AZOPT��DS b� :he City Planning Com- b 9 mission of the City of H nitinatan Beach, Cal4forn►ia, on the 10 Gth daft of �tove�riberr 1962E by the following 11 ROLL CALL VOTE : 12 AYES : LetsQn, Ba-6,11 Biller Worthy,, Kaufman, Chairman Sian . 13 NOES : None . 4 A.BSERE: Crabb. 15 MU, RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED �, 1v I? ATTES T 1� W, C . Warner AL TA'a•cd S tong 20 Secretary Chal-=an 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2s OFFICIALS QOYLE MILLER RAT�.O �� ;e / AO RIFIISTRwTI JIC orr cEn CITY OF ,GG�/h�f�J1 f (11 �' ('(G(' I� BRANDER D. CASTLE ASSISTANT ADMIMSTRATOR T'T•�Y2'�1! _ Q ----------------------------- -------------------------------------------- JAI.IES R. WiiEELCR y eQ _• Po• �� P. O. BOX 190 C A L 1 F 0 R N I A eNalNe�n li C� 1909., JAMES 13. PLUNKETT Cp�NTy CITY ATTORNEY HOWARD ROIIIDOUX s•cL,Cc CHICP COUNCILMEN DELBERT G. HIGGINS ROF3ERT M. LAI+SpERT, MANORI,�cember 1�F, 1962 rent cF++cr ERN£ST H. GISLER VINCENT G. MOORHOU3E JAKE R. STEWAli' LIFrCUAP.O CHIEF' THOMAS H. WEL,'H OLLIN C. CLEVELAND LYNDON A. WrLLS. SR. OUILOING DIRZCTOF( WILLIS C. WAFJN1=R Cirf CLERK. PLANNING DIIIECTOR PAUL C. JONES Mr . Doyle Miller, City Administrator, Huntington Beach , Calif . Deer Doyle : At the last council meeting the question of .one Case 286 was postponr.d for two weeks to determine the rights of the oil lessee who objected to this change . It is a welt' established rule that a municipal- ity has the right to regulate the business of operating oil wells within Its limits and to prohibit their oper- ation within delineated areas and districts. )3ut ordi- nances having that effect m»St be reasonable and must be for the purpose of protecting the public health , corn- fort, safety and. welfare. In light of the facts , as •wte have been able to determine , the change in question would be valid. It appears that the lessee acquired his interest over 15 years ago and has done little or nothing to develop the property. Also, the change seems to be consistent with the zoning program of the area. The ina,lor portion of the surrounding land is apparently also A-5. Mr. Fred Brown, the o•�ner of the property, intends to be at the next council meeting to state his views In favor of the change. Yours very truly, JAM ES D. PLUNKE'i T, City -Attorney M . KEATE WORLEY MKW:h Ass ' t. City Attorney I _ Huntington Beach Planning Commission P. O. Box 190 City Hall c C ��:icafl• k Huntington Beach, California November 6, 1962 L E T T E R O F T R A N S M I T T A L TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL, City of Huntington Beach, Calif . ATTN: Doyle Miller, City Administrator RE : RESOLUTION NO 287 , a resolution of the City Planning Commission recotmending approval of Zone Case 287 Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith is a copy of Resolution No 287, a resiution of the City Planning Conmiission, recommending approval of Zone Case 287 . i This rase proposes to establish a new zone, Rl-PD5 Planned Single Family Development District , which would permit developments under the provisions .get forth 4n the R1 Single Family Residence District , or modifications of certain provisions set forth therein. The es- tablishment of this district will be a step toward a more efficient and effective zoning ordinance. By unanimous vote of the City Planning Commission, Zone Case 287 was approved and recommended to your Honorable 3ody for adoption. A public hearing is not required since the proposed RI.-PD5 zone does P � � P P not pertain to any certain property. Respectfully submitted, W. C. Warner Planning Director and Secretary WCW: ib Encl: Resolution 287 Exhibit A, '. RA 7 1 I-SOLUTION NO 287 ' 2 -SOLUTION OF RECOI0IEN'DATION 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CIV PLANNING COMMISSION OF 4 THE CIV OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFOPMA, 4AKINO A UC0 4ENDATION OF APPROVAL FOR THE 5 PROPOSED A1tEN DtUNT OF THE r?UNTI10TON BEACH ORDINANCE- CODE BY ADOPT'said of THE RI-PD5 DI STRIGT e 7 W1ME s:AS;, The City Plannir.; Con-mission has proposed to mend the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code by the adoption 9 i f the Rl-FD5 Districts and 10 WFXR&jkSs Said propo�ed change would establish a zone that 11 ` mould permit de•.nalopments under the provisions set forth in 12 the Rl Si%.- Ie Family Ptelsidence District , or niodificati.ons of � 13 .ertaiz provisions set forth therein, and 14 1MREAS 31 T'jap City Plazwwmix ? Ccmml3sion has dote-pained 15 that the adoption of this district will be a step :award a 18 oxe efficient and effective zoning ordinance. � 17 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLD, 18 Section 1. That the City PlanAng Comm-Ission, as a result of Cr 19 - study and consideration, concludes 4hst the 20 adoption of this gone is a vital Ztexp toward the 21 preservation of ile :realth,, safety, prosperity 22 and welfare of the general. public . 23 ect,.on 2 , That the City Planning Ccmmission r-scouwer:ds that 24 � the attached E htbit A be adopted by the City 25 CounCi1 in ordinance f orm 2e ection 3. That the Secretazy shall cartify to the pas3aae , 27 1 ! and adoption of this resolution by the members of 28 the City Planning Cam-A scion. i 29 ! 1 _ • Res&Lution No 287 1 i i 3 4 u-1—GULAA MAY PA-'SSED AND ADOPTED BY i ALE GITN&' PLAZMINO 5 IMISSION, an the 16th day of Oel.-.-nbo.r, 1962 , by the s ©l1awin 7 110LL Q;ULL VOTE : _ES : G rabb,, Letson, BazilF ii3'afmrr l; itiort y, Miller,, CA Chairman OES : I o'ne. 10 3SENT: None . 11 HE i(ESOLUTION VAS ADOPTED . 12 13 'TTEST: 1� 3 C. garner L r,t m-rd S"a nd ecze teary Ch i n.,ta.n 17 18 19 20 i 21 I 22 i 23 y 25 26 l 27 28 29 2 'TIN Ce'l n,%I,'T 11 'I 1-f A- L I F N.:;a c in Lis.-L. -op icb L. 4r Z I r) -0.r S .7 La uyit lini i.0 f 3 ar ,U-1 1: Z, Sc s'--a7--lo r;r -73 7p I A.':L t7 r J f J_0're 7 a c IL!f!COU,--a"20 t�je U-3a of Tfloc,tt r.l L-; Z: L h de c:pa s r.;n c u C C c! a n n c- s c r e g n t: u,J 1,7n L 3 , D ve olm:mt of i mr-1,ti iati va subdivisions and bet-ter aise Qf :lac J.; nd 4, he inte;;ration of housiti with public u'ves and ca--:_ e`s 5_ Full Use of and maximErm quantity of operi si acc fcr p a-�rl:s vn Creat vic site p tirm'nit For h-ous Lro cy e US i•.S Olt Cale ?ZC-?::ii%?I'st3iliy Y dT>.'niZ1;" ::ILI .! U4 ;?Gzei1'=t.`_Cd ^„I each 1 f r ;=TZ to t-he usual at-lei custo=A-uy C-La Ceo3ij)nI st-2:actu es a.;Id uses The d--risi ty. of far.i.?ins per ;,-;3-oss -Cre may approximate the � densit;% peraiitted by 4ho P%-I Sande F roily Residence Distric- , provided the maxiltrium df- 3-s ty not exceed rive sin`le family t uft:LIIir2 units per - afi --ere devoted to residential. ttt e LOT AREA AND WIDTI", •.u.�awv�wrrws.+.>..ar�:a.nryat•.+[r.r.�++I>rr• The size of lota ma--,r be J:educed belot:T the minims Permitted by the -R-I District or the Subdivision Ordinance, but shale, not by less than 4800 scuare feet ir., net area. Interior lots shy ? not bc less than 60 rc-et wide at the fro_Zt yard Mine and cornar -sots seal11 zat be less than t0 feet at the front rar.1' >ine . .. 2 LOT GOVEP.A3E The -round floor area of all roofed structures, on lots not abuttiri-S a park or recreation area, shall not occupy more than 45r; of the lot area . On lots Qbuttinry a Dark or recreation area , s�.-,h structures shall nit occupy more than 557., of the lot area . r ONT YARD SEPBACKS Y 1./1.Iif W.1 wrMi.f..M..6f.wVRM1... .JfV�.� Va.iatlon In f-rv3nt y a-d setbacks is eneoura'ens but the average setback within the deve oprenC sh`f i not be less than 19 feet One-t)--i rd of the Iota cTj_tli Ln the dleveloprcent may have a setbac : of j 10 feet, and co i er lots -shall have a setbsLk of at leas: 15, Feet No two story st acture shall have a setback of less than 15 feet , No Garage which is entered directly from the front street shall be 3ecback less Char, 22 iEet � � I t SIDE YAR7 SELBAGPS The side yard setback for one story dwallin;s shall not be ,�=s$ than 5 feet , and fear, ts1Zo Story d��.�llinQs P not leas than 8 f r ?t However,, the enter{or side yard of a corner lot shall not be 1_e3S than 10 feet . Any n-ara�,e ►Which is entered directly from, LthgC sieta street of a •o-r-n r lot shall be setback 22 feet from Such street pine . The standard five ft and ei-jit ft side yards for one story and two story structures , respectively,; may be reduced to zero on two ad joinir-r lots and a commo:i or party wall utilized for the dwe-11in�M The rasultinry opposite side yards shall. be 10 feet for one story and 16 feet for Moo stcrl structures and shah be perpetually mainta fined as open yard .. 7 W J .. PEA-;; `.rARD SETBACK The rear ya rt'=. ;;Uh2 ck not be leas Lean IS feet , provided tll-iat ?o:r lots aIjutt_"s.n� a Teti: o=> rec-.:evttiori area , the rear yard shall n-it: be i=han 10 f o orse at ry rtrL?ctL'rf►s ; and 'J fmat f or BEIGArr No buki dJ_4�; or ctruc:ture shall o creed a heia-lit of two stories 30 feet ., i A1.1 ?a-nd zrea accumu?at.ed f.t�lcu�h t e pe'. itted reduction In "sot size shall be devoted to uarks and/or recreation j a:_ea3 2 . Public utility and other: similar easeniants st-all not- be comp :-ed as p3 t of the space exchan3a . D si 1 , Par►. and re:reati.on areas shall have 8 t;inimum area of one a,Le , aiid shall be designed as an integral part of the housing devcloptncrit CO3.Z'i:.0 QtC3 Oi: i`r.:l.�H err►, D! 13a 2:1L areaS b£'tk'e?Z rw-rs aL iOrs ILiay be c.--salted `o connect said 'Lots to a l ar,e central green. 'Chose corridors or "f i.naers" of park area. to be compvt:ed under the space exchar e, shall have a winimum Let ; Idth of 301 fec:t: for a m►�xir.i tuut net engtb of 180 feet . Suchco':'�:idCr: or tt f; £germ: of park; areas may e::ceed 180 i- j �e..� in �ngth . but ..hey should not extend more than 350 fees from a larse cent:!-al Green. Corridors or "f ingers" ci park area that el_cacd 7 �0 feet in len th shays. he more than 30 feat tel.de and should average 70 feet in width for ,any distance beyond the ii!:st 180 feet . 3 , :pry lar;e central r;::eert, orpark and recreation area, shall be of such :.ixe af;d di:xc:r.sicin that it will be suitable fog: i :=:©up recreation. Y ZI be jugged by 4.. Les t r�r of park and recreation areas sha the P?rnni-nm Cct-.nission an tine follow?r3 bases : a..; The relationship bet-wca)a housing and earl: or recreation araW shall be so d`si�ned- that as manv hcmeg as possible will adjoin said area. b . One large ;321"TL ;nay he created, provided the Plarining Ccmt-atss';on shall approve such a deaion on the basis that it: creates a _desirable relationship between houSing and pack areas, crud is otherw-ia% in harwony with other_ requirements of this ;section, _ 4 5 . The rear yards of lots , which; adjoin pars: and recreation areas , shall receive the same fencing treat-rant . PARK IMPROVEMNT AND MAINL MICE M�f�►1Y� .a1�3AF.N.Y�rAVID/�1�+ /t�T�41I11+\'�/MiI_'.V..O �Va All pzrv, and recreation :areas shall be fully -i:Xnaroved by the L developer including landsaapin3., recreation facilities , lighting, and other pert ice• f.- facilitiit.s , '_.ovi_slon for pem pect-M-1 clear. maintenance of :such areas shad be approved by ti:e Plannin Com- mission. DEVELOPMENT FILAR S All richta for 'iP th:i i Pnrlt arie, __.ez eaLion areas . cxc 1 u:iiv% Of that 3hoim pI". %2-_j:;e init-ial approved de-v elopnient plan. shall be deaded to the Ci_ :y. Noth&in y s a 'l be constructed, erected, or on a-zged, except landsl.-apii1J k_f_Si1t-s ar..d materla?S ,, without. the I expresa peratission of i hQ : .Jnntir[, Coir.m.1s3 n. PUBLIC PARKS Upon mucual. &:-reernent br:t wen the ov nci air-.'•. the City Cou:=cil;, pa---k and reizz-eati.r-in arms ay.ay be- dedicated to t?:e City for aubllc use, Provided such areas are of art uppUvVed s:.ze r shaper, improvement _. and ).ocat l n cry ar- to be 1-eadil.y acc,.3siLle and usabll! by the ereral publ.i.i arm OFF STREET PA„ RKIN ', t.o Each dwelling unit shall have on the same- lot a minimun. of two covered autottobil n parking spaces . Each space shall be at least 9 feet ojide and 19 feet lonY net dimensions, and be provided =y-ith adequate and sate access . 2 . No garage door or carport entrance shall face directly on or obtain access directly €ram any major, primary, or secondary highway, as defined. by the Huntington Beach Master Plan of Arterial Streets and High�caays 3. Each parking space !rAiich faces a street shall be equipped Ath a door to provide for its complete cnc?osure t � SIZOE OF DWELLING IMITS Each nwe1.14 ng unit shall have- a groi;s floor area of not less tban: 1. 900 square fee- for 1. bedroom units .. 2 . 1100 2vare feet for 2 bedroom units , s r 1300 square Beet for :► or more bedroom units . GrOSS fl.aar ohall nol. include -yaragcs, carports , acca_ssary buildirsgs , porches , or patios. i For the purpose of this, Sect-i on, a. d ,;e3 J,ing unit is def in a d as consisting of a i.ivina !:oom, i:itchen, ba'Uhroom, 'u��droo-an, and any number of closets . Each additional room shall be considered a bedroom. i PROCEDURE !A petition for a change of zone to RI--PD5 Pl.azuted Single Family Develop: 2nt W atr~i..t shall tie rude by the wee otnier of. the �I land of by the purchaser, lessee; or opti.anee in conjuric -ion u1izh the fey: o-�nier. A gross area of 14 acres shall be the minitww size aarcel to which ebbs District may be appl-led, The p,,t-ition for zoni.n; property RI-FI D5 shall be accompanied by preliminary plans for division of the property and .a brief outline of the type of structures , proposed park areas , and their maintenance. Zoning property to fti...PD5 shall be accomplished as prc=seribed by Article 926. PrIar to issuance of xiy building permit, or recordation of a final tract map for any nor i.on of Lhe devea lopment , a Use Permit shall be approved by the Plarmin..,-- Couni_asi.on pursuant to Sections 9249 et. seq. of the Uunti3ftgL:or. Beach Ordinance Code.. The appli- cation for such Use: permit sha?1 be uccomganied ?hy precise and detailed plans signed by the desi.onez „ These plans small include l4 A map sho�ai.r the 4.z4Q shape, and location of all lots `yid their re to street, park and rec.reati nn areas A and other public and private facilities. lit.'ies 2.. A plot plan shops trig the l ocaticn of all buildings . fences ,, and park-ing proposed r-i be constructed by the devr toper. 3. A plan of all landscaping,, proposed to be installed. 4, A plug of all %ecreation areas, , depicting their proposed size, use-, and. facllitl.es to be installed, 5e A detailed pro.ram for perpt1_5%_-ua': clean mainterwaince of all park zund re-creation areas; and facilitles , 6 . Any other in.tormation tba Planning Commission may deem necessat".1 to assure that the In- _nt and purpose of this Diatrict will be fully realized , ACTION BY THE PLANNI0u COMMISSION In taking action, the Plamiir g Commission may deny a permit, may grant a permit as submitted, or may grant: a per-wit subject: to conditions . i DEVELOPMEl'I?' SUBJECT TO CO MITIONS Any planned single framily development, as approved, shall be Subject to all conditions imposed; also, all provisions of Chapter 97 (Subdivision O.di-jance) of the Huntington Beaeb Ordinance Code sball be complied with, unless otherwise herein provided and approved in the adoption of the tract map or precise plans of the development . DUTY OF THE BULL INC ZNSPECTO Following approval of a. Pla-med Single Family Development Use Permit, the Build-].ng Superintendent shall ensure that development is undertaken aid completed in conformance withthe approved plans. EXPIRAT;ON OF A ZSE PEMIT In any case :here a Planned Single Family Development Use Permit has not been used iAthir. one year after the date of granting thereof'. then vithost further action, the Use Permit shall. be null and void. 7 EXTENSIONS f Extensions of time limitations in this article may be ranted b3 the Plarcing Cut isa3.on upon showing of goad 'faith and efLort r by the pezrIttee. Failure to so ccmpiy with time limitations shall be by reason of conditions beyond ih� control of the permitt.ee . APPEAL The determination of the FImmiing Commission may be appealed as provided by Ssction 9249 ,4 of the Runtfnc- �z�t• Beach Ordinance Code.. If no appeal, is taken —lth;n the time prescribed, the detart-Anation of the Planning Camwir siort shal�. be final. I I1?tiiszlts�.saalitt»5, ,.1�.Ryan n;si.'i - A ir S ' Publication MdaV �a%rais r��s' !i� ra•`,��if�h�vs� �a..�;� ln.the:Ctisia� tambir ''o�•t2:t �.itr l�fi�; . ,flctat.a�tou:;3�ptJ��CaI 1�.Y3a�:cl;z� Aa-t; State of t;,alifornia �:�It_o� � .P,}i� o}�`a. touiiZ;tbarint:ts'. County.of Orange ss City of Huntington Beach ot rap; 'trldgrl�� a°,tsz!;!i4m .tor_» c3uasa �f:iotte ,fioi5:�-t;�:'Chdu:ussitY` �t tiipua`.Distr:c.'� J.? S. Farquhar, being di fly sworn on oath, says: That he is a pi'na :►;ntts lgFvrfly Re+�ds�s:s D:st ct,". citiZeh of the United States, over the Ube of twenty-one years. Lacxlai-1 ca`the riir h �id.'_at_Lttlea 't1�,is►ba'ttes� :+3G 3s: �r'ssr .�Y 3cete� That lie is the printer and publisher of the Huntington Beach :•nesl,acrct aad lonauY d•s �'a� v News, a weekly newspaper of general circulation printed, published and circulated in the said County of Orange and elsewhere and � : 7 •e :rtvs �Q :ei4t }+t :1►t +at�i-:D'J trio: ;; published for the dissemination of local and other news of a general ist:•$toci�,3;aw:;oi en. Fes• �,;; character. and has a gotta fide subscription list of paying subscribers: ;Tact tri":i,i<clir c: Funiin(t;c Aeaicb aria quid paper has l}eett established printed and published in the f F r p Rlt tt:twrasted UTM-.lavit&d to;., State of California, and County of Orange, for at lcast one year next 1g1:81id, 3a!tt 1<ooiir 'dad' evrTWXo thYis. before the publication of the first insertion of this notice; and the icDinirzik Eor-c;;z3'Tjcst i�Jd,:anv oivrrt�st� said newspaper is not devoted to the interest of, or published for the iurthafr: t CL 66Laitek:.�Jcar entertainment of any particular class, profession, trade, calling, race or denominntion, or any Jtumber thereof. CRX of 'Su'rrttWc'�e7N' grlicR. The Huntington Beach News was adjudicut-d a Iegal newspaper of general circulation by Judge G. K. Scovel in the Superior Court r of Orange County, California August 27th, 1937 by order No. A-5931. That the 140TICE OF PUBLIC HU.11 ING ZONE CASE NO, 288 of which Ilse annexed i5 a fainted copy, was published in said np.ws- paper at least One l a sue commencing from the 6th dnyof December 19_62 , and ending on the 6thdayof December 19 b'� both clays inclusive. and as often during sail period and I times of publication as stild pnlker was regularly issued, and in the regular and entire issue of sMd newspaper proper, and not in a supplement, and said notice was published therein on die following dates, to-wit: December 6 , 1962 ublisher E Suhscribed and sworn to before me this ____-1r.� day of Notary Tljr)P SAS h, -V Orange County, C_Bfcrniae NOTARY Pugtl_. CALIF. tviy Commission Expi;rs 55cp1. i 3, 1966 ,� R ��s Huntington Beach Planning Commission P. O. Bps 190 city gull ��. ��r'i �• •'�Q Hurunaeon Beach, California December 3, 1962 L E T T E R O F T RA N S M I T T A L TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL, City of Huntington Beach, Calif. ATTN: DOYLE MT.LLER, City Administrator RE: RESOLUMN NO 288, a resolution of the r-It-.r Planning Commission recommending approval. of Zone Case 288. Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith is a copy of Resolution No 288, a resolution of- the City Planning Co ission, recommending approval of Zone Case 28t1 . This case proposes to change the zone on a parcel of land consisting of approximately 0. 3.4 acres located on the north side of Utica 5treet and 130 feet west of Beach., Boulevard £r6ra=- C.2 Community Business District to R-4 Multiple r amily Residence - District. The City Planningg Commission held a public hearing on the matter on November 20, 1969, at wbich time- treie was no one present to speak either for or against the proposal By unanimous vote of the City Planning- Commission, Zone Case 288 was approved and recommended to your Honorable Body for adoption. The Code provides that a public hearing shall be held on the matter after which an ordinance may be adopted effecting the change. Respectfully submitted, - W. C. Warner Planning Director and Secretary WCW: lb Encl: Legal Description Resolution No 288 7i ti RESOLUTION - h0 288 2 RESOLUTION? 4F RECO�SiENDATION � 3 A RESOLU:'LON OF THE CITY PI AiMIL.T.G.' G€3IVISSION OF 4 TIE CITY OF 11MITINGTON BEACH, CALIPCTt•ICAs RE- Ca'DIENDI NG APF aIVAL Ox ZONE CASE 2 8 8 . I G e WHEREAS % The City Planting Cots fission of the City of Huntington Rea^h, Cali.forni.a, has held one public hearing in j 8 compliance with the Strste Government Code in order to consider 9 10 and review, zone Case 288 , and lI t-112R.EAS; The City Planning Commission, on the basis of � land use aurueye , :waster *P Lary of Land Use, Master Plan of 12 � Arterial highways , existing zoning and consideration given to 13 14 the general piih..ie} does detenine that the property outlined 10 for a char;e of zone doe$ - fulf i1I the criteria deer-ad necessary to create q ,rllt'ip 18 le miI.y cc s dential_ Di.str:.ct . NOW `TJ1 ;:FFORr. RE V_7 "1cESOLVr.D 3�? , Is Section 1. That. the City Planning Coa=ission, as a result of stud,: And onaide ration,cone ludes that 4be appl.i. 20 cant =s request .for a char gp of none to R-4 Multiple � Rama;Tv- Residence District does iiteet the criteria 1 21 1 I . 22 deemed neceasary to establish a resA.uen..:.al di.strLc 2� f or: the f of loO ng reasons 1. The property is ad oLning an R-4 zone on the 24 east 25 2, The pro-party pro-party is ear ity accessible from a major 26 highway located 130 feet to the east: � 27 Section 2. That the City. Flaming Commission re,-,omiends approva lL 28 of Zone Casa 288 to the City Council. 29 i • `� -?ution Ila 4$8 1 3 2 3 4 Section 3. The Secretary shall certify and attest to the 5 adoption - of this resolution by the membe- rs of the City Plenni.na Commission. 7 R EGULARLY PASSED AND ADOPTED-4 by the City Planning 8 Commi s s ion of the City of Hu_ntina Con Beach, California on S the 20th day of Noveamhers 1962, by the £olloving 10 ROLL CALL voT—E: 11 AYES : Grabb`, Letson, KaufmMi, Worth- vs miller, Chairman Stang. - 12 None,, 23 ABSENT: Bazil , jl 34 TM "'SOL13'i`1OjN =AS ADCP i ZD. 16 IB 17 18 19 W. �. Warner award Stang SnCret3lry Chairman 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 E 29 j Affidavit Lf Pubfication - WW,CW, State of.California County of'Or3nge,, - sq J , �t, ��its.: :=af City of Huntington Beach J. S. Farquhar, being duly sworn on oath, says: That he Is a = citizen of the United States; over the age of twenty-one"years. That he is the printer and publisher of the Iuntington ,Beach News, a weekly newspaper of general circulation printers, :published and circulated in the said County. of. Orimle, and elsewhere published for the dissemination of local and:other,news of-a generml. d �� cha mcter and has a bona fide subscrtp Lion-lint of'payin 'subscribers ;�+��; �'-�-. r ""`'� and said paper has been established,: printed .and-. published-in the psi dalzt State of Calilornia, and County of Orange, for at least-one year next f aird�9ii�.aurk=eaiui}t before the Publication of the first Insertiou of this notice;: and the said newspaper is not devoted to the Interest of, or published for the entertainment of any particular class, profession, trade, calling, race +i'l sflan� safdi;I.ocr�og�cA or denomination, or any number thereof. �js�cs�; � � taco-a',�';+oaa' =� `-�''t' s j g newspapertnlaras7,bd�a�taRa�'E, `The Huntington Beach News was adjudicated a legal n ��, i�ts<irin•_.tlsr>i.�^:s.�. { of general circulation• by Judge G.`JC Scovel in Uie`Supciior Court of Orange County, Cail[ornial Au ist 27th,{-1937 by order No. A-.5931. [ � try�� {3F•` � • -ram�,: .r.,�... That the NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING- _ ZONE CASE NO 289 of which the annex-ed Is a printed copy, was published in said news- paper at least One Ieeue commencing fibm the 6th day of December. 19 , and ending on the 6th day ot_December. 19 62 both days inclusive, and as often during said period and times of publication as said paper was regularly issued, and.in the regular and entire issue of said newspaper proper, and. not In a supplement, and said notice. was published therein on the following dates, to-wit: December 6, 1962 Publisher Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 19_ y No Public �3► TI-10t 15 D. 15 O. .nge Countp,'Californla NOTARY FURUC, UAANI-r l _:';'NTy, C141r, My CAmmission Expii u-p Sept. 13, 196E .� _ Hnndn. gton- beach Planning Comnissio=_o- rs P. o. Box 100 �° r� p• "Y City Hall Huntington Beach Califonda December 3 , 1962 L E T T E R 0- F T R A N 5 M I T T A L TO: HONORABLE- MAYOR= AND CITY COUNCIL, City of Huntington Beach, Calif . AT61PN: DOYIS MILLER, City 'Administrator RE : aESOLUTION NO 289, a resolution of the City Planning Commission recommending partial approvaz ' of Zone Case 289. Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith is a copy of Resolution No 289, a resolution of the City Planning Commission, - recommending partial approval of Zone- Case 289 j This case proposes to change the zone on a parcel of land consisting of approximately- 0 : 94 acres` located at-the northwest corner of Beach Boulevard and Newman Street from R_4 X Suburban Residential District as adopt-a, by Interim Ordinance No 668 .- and C-1 Neighborhood` Commercial District to C-3 General Business' District with setback- provisions.' The. City Planning_ Commission held a public hearing on the matter on November 20, 1962, at which time the applicant explained his proposal and one other person spoke-- in favor .- of - the proposal'. After careful consideration of the matter, the Planning Commission concluded that a C-3 zone was not appropriate for the area and there- fore , recommends that the- reques*ted C-3 kone be denied. The Planning Commission 'further concluded " that" the= property is suitable for expansion of the existing C-1 zone and.., It- is their recommendati on` .-that a C-1 zone' j be adopted for the entire property in-``lieu of the- reque.stdd.- C-3 . The Code provides that a public hearing shall be held on the matter after vh.ich an ordinance . may be' - adopted- effecting the change . Respectfully submitted, f i W. C . Warner Planning Dire^_tor and Secretary WCW:lb Encl: Legal Description Resolution- No 289 ram► � i 2 RESOLUTION NO 289 3 RESOLUTION OF HECOMMEN RATION A RESOLUTION OF THE - CITY- PLAN�iII�i4 COMKISSION ' OF '"'HIE- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BLACK, CALIFORNIA-9 5 AECONMENbING, DENIAL OF ZONE CASE 2896 6 7 WHEEEAS, The City Planning- Commisslon of the City of 8 Huntington Beach, California, has held one public hearing in 9 compliance with the, state Government - Code in order to consider 10 and revie�* Zone Case 289, and 11 WHEREAS, The City Planning Commission, on the basis of laoid 12 use surveys , Viaster Plan of Land. Use , Piaster Plan of Arterial it 13 Highways* existing . zoning ansi conalderation given to the goner 1 14 public, does determine that the property outlined for a change 15 of zone to C-3 General Busine' se District does not meet the 18 criteria deemed necessary to create a C-3 zone . 17 NOW THEREFORE BE IT- RESOLVED$ is Section 1. That the City Planning Commission, as a result of 19 study and consideration, concludes that' the appli- 20 cam's request for a change of zone does not meet 21 the criteria deemed necessary to establieh a C-3 22 General Business Dlstrlet for the following reaso 23 1. Al L-he uses mitt d - 1 the C-�3 zone would noz be compact a wi n- the surrounding -lighter 24 types of businesa � development in the area- and a llghter,' mare restrictive zone could possibl 25 be applied to the property. 28 Section--2.v BE IT FJRTHER.:"RESOLVED, that the Plannsrig Com- 27 m1selon eoncludas that a C-1 Neighborhood Business _. 28 District would be more suitable for the property 29 Involved. Resolution No 289 1 v 2 Section - 3. That the City Planning Commission recommends 3 dental of the requested C-3 zone to the City 4 Council and - further recommends adoption-of a C--1 5 e Zone for the entire property involved. 7 Section 4, The Secretary, shall certify and attest to the 8 adoption of this resolution by the members of the 9 City Planning Commission. 30 REGULARU PASSED , 1 ADOPTED,, by the City Planning Com- it mission of the City of Huntington Beach, California, on the 12 20th day of November, 1962, by the following 1 13 ROLL CALL VOTE: 14 AYES: Crabb, Kaufman - Worthy, Chairman Stang. 15 NOW; Le tson, Y1113.er o 18 ABSENT: Bazil 17 THE HESGLUTION -WAS ADOPTED. 18 19 ATTEST: 20 21 W e e- Warner 3-:dwaM Stang 22 Secretary Chairman 23 24 25 26 i 27 28 29 Affidavlot Publication, State of California County of-Orange ss City of Huntington 73e>1cb J. S. Farquhar, being duly swore, on oath, says: That he is a citizen of the United States over-the age of twenty-ona-Years: y R31 aro �YNer►n: That he Is the printer and publisher.of the -Huntington 'Beach !�� News, a weekly newspaper of general circulation-printed,--publlii ed x and circulated in the said County of Orange.-and'.elsewhere` and ,� 71073Ce:2s Rlesr ciiY�l ai o,: published for the dissemination of_local and other,news of.a generalhsa ,� 1 b bsla;t , character, and has a bona fide subscription list of paying;subscribers,. L+`, ::of the:Ci1y;fir Hustf;ngt .t! y fnA and said paper has been established,:printe&'and-publl hed'=in the-, Olt, State of California;and County of Orange, for at least one:year:next y tlwT,`1� }�; GaI:Ets ct,teors before the publication of the 33rst_insertion;of this notice•..:and the' �.'�'� "�� v nn �!!� "�' ►° ' ': said newspaper Is not devoted to the Interest of, or published-for thef eto a_ entertainment of-any particular'class; profession, trade, 'ealling,'raee ��sa ! � { or denomination,-or any number thereof.` b c 1:_>tor,0 !fit aad'8 -'X`fiubaicidtin 1 The Huntington Beach'News was adjudicated a legal� newspaper • of general circulation,by Jud a.G.:&,Scovel-ln the Superior: Court.*- of Orange,.County; CablorniiE August 27th:1937 by order No. A-5931.1V--1U - J '3 ► ,. <. { u*,L�cctesdyo�t ts.i�oril�iitt,e:a �a�ar �;llreaas_,o� ;�ts ►'t�j�tra�e3 B+�fi That the NOTICE OF' USE DISTRICT- HEA.RI-NG ;;t-, Ir.. I Toe; = Q pa ; �'4! Era n4tth �quei►Ear _ �� 5-1�.�oa4l':�li��_-'t'racf�•L�o: �tS' -ZONE CASE NO .90 _. of which the annexed is a printed copy, was published in said ileovs= l i':��E s�1:YlblltaG`^�BJLt�f�''�.�fj►��'� S¢ . paper at least One Issue at3m3= sdirl lr�. =wad v „aas.- air .�#ainus:io�or4ast' aflsse. t ;�0 21a t February commencing from the _ day ofrW CUTk 6 21et February 19 3 and ending on the "day of 1 63 both days inclusive, and as often during said period- and times of publication as said parer was .regularly issued; and in the regular and entire issue of said newspaper proper, -and .not •in a supplement, and said notice was published therein Cn- the following dates, to-tvit: F �rr ,_�� e - t f Publisher ly Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of A" 19 Gam. %' CI _�.-- Notary Public 7MOMhS D. WAVEOrange County, California NOTAP.Y i UBUC, ORANGE t oLlrivr. CALIF. X- C . ?go My Commission Expires Sopt'. :3, 1966. r Huntington, Beach Planning Commission - .....i.- P. o. Box 190 c+ CIty Halt Hultlngton beach, California February 18, 1963 L E T T E R C F T R A N S M I T T A L TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL, City of Huntington Beach, Calif . ATTN: DOYLE MILLER, City Administrator RE: RESOLUTION NO 290, A resolution of the City Flanning Commission recommending approval of a portion of Zone Case ?90 and -further recommending= denial-- of a portion' of Zone Case 290, Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith is a copy of Resolution No 290, a resolution of the City Planning Coru ission? recommending approval of a portion of -Zone Case 290 and- further' recommending ;denial of= a portion of Zone Case 290. This case proposes to change the zone on 71. 73 acres of land situated on the north side of Slater Avenue and extending from Beach Boulevard to Newland Street from C-I Neighborhood "Commercial.-- District `and R=4=X- Suburban Residential District ' to.=R=l: Single Family' Residential--District and C-2 Commun ty_,.Business District. This case was first heard by the Huntington Beach Planning Commission on November 20, 1962, and again : on January 20, 1963, at which times the Gent for the applicant requested=ti-a continuance. i b The City Planning Commission held a continued public hearing on the matter on February 5, 1963, at which time there was no one present to speak either for or Against the proposal. They pointed- out that too much depth_ was involved= in -the parcel= for the C-2 zone ' and. that adequate i C-1 zoning already exists in the - area:.- The portion of the zone case for R-1 zone is merely the routine zoning of a new single family residence;' tract By unanimous vote of the City Planning Commission a portion of Zone Case 290 was approved - and a portion -of Zone Case 190--was denied. and recommended to your Honorable Body�- for adoption: The Code provides that a public hearing shall be head on the matter after which an ordinance may be adopted effecting the change. Respectfully submitted, W. C. Warner WCW: lb Planning Director and Secretary Encl: Legal. Description &_Resolution No 290- i RESOLUTION NO 290 2 RESOLUTION of RECOMMENDATION 3 A RESOLUTIGR OF THE CITY PLANNING CM114ISSION OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON' BEACH_, CALIFORNIA, 4 RECOMMENDING .APPROVAL OF A PORTION OF ZONE CASE 290 AND FZ, RT'HER RECOMEHBING DENIAL OF A PORTION 8 OF ZONE CASE 290, e 7 WHEREAS, The City Planning Commission of the City of't 8 Huntington Beach, California, has held one public hearing- in t:ompliance with State Government Cotle in order to consider A � " 1 10 and review Zone Casa 21901, and • 11 WHEREAS , The City Planning po"sion, on the basis. 'of 12 land use surveys, Master Plan of -Land Use, Master Plan of 13 Arterial . Highways , existing zoning and consideration given to � •14 the general public does determine thwat the, pro erty outlined � : F 15 for a change of zone to R-1 Single Family Residence District 18 does meet the crjteris deemed necessary to establish a resi.- 17 dential district and that the property outlined for a change 18 of zone to C- 2 Co erci.al Business District does not meet the 19 criteria deewd necessary to establish a co=nercial zone. 20 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, 21 Section 1. That the City Planning Ca=ission, as a result of 22 study and- consideration, concludes that the 23 .applicant i s request for a change of zone does in 24 part meet - the criteria deemed necessary for a 25 change of zone, to R•l Single Fancily Residence 2$ District for the following reasons 27 1. There is a final recorded map on the subject property: - that::was designed to ".et the ram 28 quirementa of the RMI zones Tract 4009 , 29 2. The rezoning of the area will eliminate any uses that'- are -not c tibia with ' single l - Re9ution N0 290 3 Section 2. That the City Planning Commission concludes that t e applicant:a - request for a chenge of zone to 3 C-2 Commercial Business District does not meet 4 the requirements deemed necessary to create a s commercial district for the following reasons: 6 1. There is too great of depth in the pared 7 proposed for commercial zoning and any further e ca—rcial zoning would overload the locale streets in the arm, 9 2. There already is ample commercial zoning in to the area. �l Section 3. That Ole City Planning Commission recommends 12 approval of a portion of ?one Cabe 290 and 13 further recommenats denial of a portion of Zoone 14 Case 290 to the City Council, 36 Section 4.. The Secretary shall certify a:id attest to the le adoption of thLs resolution by the members of the 17 City Planning Commission, lA REGULARLY PASSED AND ADOPla"NaD, by the City Planning Com� i 39 mission of the City of Huntington aeacb, California, on the 20 5th day of February, 1963, by the following 21 ROLL CALL VOTE: 22 AYES : Cratbb, Letson, Ba►zi.l- Uuf=-an, ;�vorthy, miller, Chairman Stang. 23 NOES: None. 24 A'BS ENT; 13one. 25 THE: USCLUTION WAS ADOPTED. 29 27 ATTEST: 28 29 Warner +gar an ':cry---Cary Mal watn Affidavit Publication State of Calffarnln County o'Orange; ss City of Huntiin"ton Beach-: J. S. Farquhar, being duly sworn on oath, says: That lie is a citizen of the United States,*over the age of twenty-one years. That he is the printer and publisher of the Huntington Beacl<i News, a weekly newspaper of general circulation-printed, published%' nd circulated in the said County�of Orange and elsewhcrei and published for the dissemination_of local and=ether.news of:a general character; and has a-bors-fide'subsdiption list;of paying-zubscribers;a r and said r has-been established rinted�and ublished;in`;fire Pape.. , P,_ P State of California,-wW-County of Orange `for,at leasrbne year next^ • r before the ptblication df the,first=insertlon ofahis;notice and the said news 1s not devoted to`aiie`interes of'`or• ublisfied paper. p. F. 7, M1,��e1tre,.. 4:Aiy.� as wogs : entertainment.-of-any pixticular class; pnfession;;fradetcalling -race ai` or denomination, or any number thereof:- 1303 The Huntington Beach-News wtis 'adju'dicated a legal newspaper. lfS rwA"4 i a ME' of general circulation by Sudgy C -K:-Scovelin the Superior Court of Orange County, California-Augustti27tli 1.937 by or cr.1No. A-5931: That the I QTTQE�}F US F DPiC2` % (r = 1stioesfl : ± ZONE GA Z L' 1',V, �9 1 of which the annexed is a printed copy, r as published in said nevvs- !L paper at least One 1 s e ue b al day of commencing from the March f 19. 6 3 and ending on the 21-181 day of- ai!rh t.--� ,;�� =,�• r�t r• s .r y; 1963 both days inclusive, and as often during said period mid .. times of publication as said parer was, regularly issued, and iri the regular and entire issue of said-`newspaper::proper, _and not -in a supplement, and said notice was published therein on the following dates, to-wit: March 21 , 1963 o Publisher Subscribed and sworn to before me thin day of �..r- ' Notary Public T1 l,�A" v. WYLLff Orange County,-California NOTARY : CALM. p� My Commiuion Expire: Scpll. 13, 1 y,6 °� � �y Huntington Beach Planning Commission ••=•..s^ P. U. Box 190 City Hall��► 'POW �' 14untington Beach, California March 18, 1963 LETTER CIF TRANSMITTAL TO ; HONORABLE MAYO:? AND CITY COUNCf L, City of Huntington Beach, Calif . ATTN: DOYLS MILLER City Administrator RE: RESOLUTION N0 291, .A resolution of the City Planning Commission recommending approval of Zone Case 291 for a C-2 Community Business District rather ,than a C-4 Higbway' Commercial District -, Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith is a copy of Resolution No 291, a resolution of the City Planning Commission recommending -approval- of Zane Case 291 for a C-2 CommunityL'..Business District - rather - than -a C-4 Highway Commercial District as requested: This case proposes to change the zone on approximately 2.07 acres of land situated at the southwest corner of Warner Avenue and Newland Avenue from R-1 Single Family ResideeP�: District to' a commercial zone. This case was first heard by the Huntington Beach Planning Commission on November 20, 1962, - a ain on January .'2 1963, and again on February 5, 1963. Each -time the agent or =the -apple.cant=='requested .a continuance,:, i The City Planning Commission held .-a continued public hearing on t:..e matter on March S, 19631., at Mnich .time the applicant gave a history of this case. There was no one present to speak agai ln_st -the proposal. By majority vote of the City Planning Commission, Zone Case 291 was approved for a. C-2- Co.nimunity Business,- District -with setback provisions rather than the requested 2C-4' Zone for the reasons outlined in Resolution-";of `Recommendat ion---No 293.. The Code provides that a public hearing shall be held on the matter after which an ordinance'�, may he adopted effecting the change Respectfully submitted, CMG` Lf-'��1it-LC:•L% W. C. Warner Planning Director and Secretary WCW: Ib l Encl: Resolution 291 Legal Notice E I � 1 RESOLUTION NO 291 2 RESOLUT1014 OF RECO -ENDATION 3 A RESO Tz ON OF THE CITY PU.NNII;G MMMISSION $ aF Th'E CITY Oz MT TINGTON BEACH' CALIFORNIA. FX-C0*ffND2X0 APPROVAL OF ZONE CASE 291 FOR. A 5 C--2 COMMUMTY BUSINESS DISTRICT RATHER THAN it C-4 HIGHWXZ COIIHERCIAL DISTRICT. e 7 WHEREAS, The City Planning C•ommiosion of the City of Huntington Beach, California, has head one public hoaring -.n 9 compliance with the State Goveznment Cade 1n+ order to consider 1� and review Zone Case 291, and 11 12 b EREAS, The City Planning Commission, on the basis of � land use surveys, Master Plan of Arterial Highways, existing 13 zoning and consideration gkven to the general public, does 14 15 determine that the property outlined for a change of zone 1�3 from F-1 Single ►amity Residence District does not meet the criteria deemed necessar - to establish a C-4 Highway Coim- 17 I8 sm- ='Lal District, i 19 NOW THE RWOR3E BE IT i�ESOLVED, � 24 Section 1. That the City Planning Commission, as a result 21 of study and conaiderati.on, concludes that the 22 applicant' s request for a change of zone does 23 not meet the criteria deemed necessary to establis• a C..4 Highway Co=erclal District, 24 25 Section 2. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Platuni.ng 26 Commission concludes that the property involved 27 would be better suited for a C-2 tore for the 28 g follovAn reasons 29 fir • , 16 1 1) The parcel was not included within 'bast 3 3362 as an integral part of the development. 4 (2) The size of the parcel would best lend itself to a rghty business devalopmer_t . a Section 3. That the: City Px arming Co=lssion recommends g approval of Zone Csse 291 to the City Council for a C--2 Commin. 1ty Business District rather than the requested c;-4 Highway Commercial District , 9 Section 4. ''.`:1e. Secretary shill certify and attest to the 10 adoption of this resolution by the members of 11 the City Plaming Commission, 12 REGULARLY PASSED AfvD ADOPTED, by the City Planning Com- 13 :zsission of the City of Huntington Beach, Caiifo--nia, on the 1� 5th day of I-larch, 1963, by the following 18 POLL CALL VOTE: 18 AYES : Crabb, 3ratson, Brazil, Worthy, Miller, Chairman Stang. I 17 14OES S . Kaufman. 18 ABSEYF: None . i9 THE RESOLUTION WIS ADOPTED. 20 21 ATTEST: 22 23 2* W. C arner Edward Stang 25 Secretary Chai=an 26 27 28 29 N 2 w. 4 Affidavit Publication.. State of Cdillf6min unfy of Orrir�ge; ss ty of;3tin gton tBeach J. S. Farcluhnr, being duly sworn on oath, says; That he is a aitixen of the United States, over the ego of twenty-ore years. That he is the printer and publisher of the_ Huritington Beach News, a weekly newspaper•of general circulation°printed;`published Fj ` �iR. 1.3 ism and circcilated in the said, County,of :Orange 1•and elsewhere- and:.�� ,-_• - s�<E� �, als .;ti�J. published for tl�,e dissemination ofaocal and oilier news of a;general � slc 18 Ti4#Y ffiat s:y •; character, and has a bona-fide tgubscriptioit+2ist'of.paying`sutiscribera, r�ra �r3.�: �,ibi'�,C�s• and said paper-:has been established,,-'printed..and published i in"Ahe ° P';�"�3trgr��lri�t ow' ch, s=ihs State of California, and.County U Orange,14or'af'-least one--yearnext; before the publication-of ihe: firattinsertion ofAhl lslnotiee;i and ahe • ' AI7' F F .3�'b dock P bt.s os w loon tlMrMlgs said newspaper is'not devotMiLo-the,�interest of;�orpublished for�.the .; :�a�,.-iaro; ,•_p�.f: � >e�� entertainment of=,anyjp& ciilar class, profession;`.trade;calling=;i-aced +►,;3ss�;i' rs>a.:y posw'vf'cwie�ti �'� or denomination, or any:numlicr�thereof. " _' .. , _- •, ihoaa-A 1 Fadr�►'moor. .-.'. The Huntington Beach News was.adjudicated a legal,rKwvspaper of general ci culation,by Judge G:�K:;Scovel'-in-.the.Superior.;.Court:f ' """ of Orange County; California;August27th;7-1937.by:order No.-A-593L= 2�7 od Twat Wo MO 1a trw CIS o!L NOTICE OF;:USE DISTRICT.; HEARING - V x - That the f alit= sia.:t- ,:"eas 3Asirai qr +s td &"Wing amd�°aspaws ,11�r zoo` CASEo. 29 2 of which the annexed is a printed copy; was published in said news- One Issue paper at least - Ctsr Gcdt i commencing from the 23r8 dray of May i 19-6-3, and ending on the Ld- day-of MA 19_k3, both days inclusive, and as often during said period and times of publication as said paper:was;regularly-issued; and in the regular and ent4�:Wde of said "iiewapai�er. proper,`and-.not:-In a. supplement, and said notice-was -published-therein on th$-follotit►ing dates, to-wit: May 239 1963 L.[/ e�f4zzll / Publisher Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 2nall_ 1st_ ,C�24G r4 ; Notary Public T}IQNIi',i D. }'frr1WI.L» Orange County,'Cnlifarnia [+NARY PUBLIC. t, y Commission bpirc:; Sept. 13, 1966Za 1?z Huntington. Beach Planning Commission V a P. O. Box 190 LP 29 eky Hall Huntington Beach, California May 20, 1963 L E T T E R a F T R A N S M I T T A L TO : HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL, City of Huntington Beach, , Calif. ATTN Doyle Miller, City Administrator RE: RESOLUTION N0 2929 a resolution of the City Planning Commission recommending'approval of Zone Case 292, Gent leaven: Transmitted herewith is a copy of Resolution No 292, a resolution of the City Planning Commission, recommending approval of Zone Case 292. This case proposes to change the zone on approximately four acres of land situated approximately r600 feet south - of Edinger Avenue on the west side of Bolsa ' Chica- Street'-, from R�-1' Single Family Residence- District to R-3 Limited= Multiple =Family. Residence District .- This change or zone _:tiles ;ori-finally up for hearing on November 20, 1962, but at the request, of =the-_applicant • was continued f several times. The last time , the matter.-was-1 consi dered "was , on 'March`'�.5 1963, and the case was again contnueda,pendi_ng _f iing:'of a " tentative map for subdivision -,...: . �.�..�, ,� At the of the property to ;.provide •alleys - fore the proposed -apartments,, same time, the; Secreaiy}to ";the ;Planning Com�inission was instructed to a ain notify" the adj3centproperty owners of -the proposed :zone 'change s�.nce the matter had'.' en be ,.continued for, m,'so any months and 'a full public hearing `had notbeen :held: The Tentative Map was filed as requested and approved as Tract 5148. At that time, one person was opposed=.,to =the multiple family develop- ment and a gentleman fr"om the Bolsa' Chica`--Homeowners `Association. a s s.ed fora continuance ',.--,- -, The City Planning Corianission held a continued public hearing on the matter on May 7, 1963, at V ich time there was no one present to speak against the proposal.. and the developer) explained his proposal and of fered: to answer any questions 11 By unanimous vote of the City Planning Commission, Zone Case 292 was approved and- recommended to� your Honorable Body-"for adoption. The Code provides that a public hearing shallbe held on the matter after which an ordinance may .be� adopted.. ;effecting the change . Respectfully submitted, W. C. Warner, WCW: lb Planning Director and Secretary Hncl : Legal Description Resolution 292 1 RESOLUTION NO 292 2 . RESOLUTION OF RECOKKENDATION 3 A RESOLUTION .OF THE CITY PLANNING CC MISSION 4 OF THE CITY .Of HUNTINGTON. BEACH* CALIFORNIA- RECOMI MMING APPROVAL -OF ZONE CASE 292. e WICE REAS! The City Planning Commis s s on of the city of 7 Huntington Beach'„ California. has hold one public hearing 8 in compliance with the State government Code. in order to 9 consideraand review Zone Case 292, and to WHEREAS, The City Planning Comcission, on the basis of 11 12 land use surveys, Master Plan of Arterial Highways, existing zoning and consideration given to tlw general public, does 3 1� determ#.� that the property outli ed for a change of zone ' to R-3 Limited Multiple Family Dissidence District does meet l� the criteria doewd necessary to create said district for ' 18 17 the following reaaan�: Is, There is an approved subdivision map on the property 18 that has been designed for multiple family use. 19 2. The layout is such that it will provide a transition 20 between the commercial to the north And the single family residential to the south. 21 3. The property is abuttin a major artarial highway 22 that � will provide easy ingress and egress. 23 NOW, THEREFORE i BE IT M. OLVED IF 24 Section 1,6 That the City ialax;,c.i.ng Commission, as a result 25 of study and consideration, concludes that the 2e applicant 's rest for a change of zone does 7 met the criteria deemed necessary to create a y 28 R"3 Limited Multiple Family Residence District. 29 A t . ResolutJONO 292 i CL 2 3 4 Section 2. That tim City Plmujing Comi.ssion recomuends � approval of Zerne Case 292 to the City Council. F� y e Section 3. The Secretary shall certify and attest to the 7 adoption of this resolution by the members of 8 the Catty Pl.ex-ming Ccx mission. 9 REGMARLY xPASSED AND -ADOPTED, by the City Planning iU Commission of the city of Huntington Beach, California, on 11 the 7eh day of Mayo 1.9:3„ by the following 12 ROLL GALL VOTE: 13 AYES: Cr&bb, Letson, Bazil, Kaufman, Worthy, Chaizzar. Stang, 14 NOES : Nona. 18 ABSE<IT: Miller, i8 TI-M RESOLUTION TW ADOPTED O 17 18 z ATTEST: 19 20 21 arrer Edw*rd Stang 202 Secretary C'haiivan 23 24 25 28 27 2a 29 I