Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Zone Change Cases - 1966 - ZC 66-7 - ZC 66-8 - ZC 66-9 - ZC
-•^ f C A *of- ffidavit �� �lip�rti�n State of Californian i4- J Cot<nty:ai;'Urange as- ApgRdvim 'By cory cc:;,-;cn City of Huntington Beach ` J. S. Fazquhar, being duly sworn on oath, says: ThaL he is a MAR 211966 „M i4_ citizen_oL:tom-_United States,,over the age of twenty-one years. Thiel lie'is" the printer and-•publisher`of.the Huntington-Beach News, a weekly newspaper of general circulation printed, publish 00 and circulated In the said County o! Oruaige and elsewhere an Crry Cs.i~Y.IR puw6hed for the dissemination of local and ot?ier news of a general , character, and has a bona fide cttbscription list of paying subscribers, : _ r and said paper has been e-3tablished, printed and published :In the -s . � - State of Californla,'and County of Orange,,for at.least one year nrxt {P ,bttii�td H3in:Ingtcr± �ar,.'s heir wi uch ia. i9661 beforQ"the publication of the first inscrtion-of this notice; an3 the said newspaper Is not devoted to the interest of, or published for the , entertainment of any particular class, profession, trade, calling,-race - '`rt•....� :f j'Ml�- G1V£t :birt > ° or denomination, or any ntimbir thereof. i The Huntington Beach News was adjudicated a legal newspaper go.- `..the>,�9► 01:4ulSlta$t0etriEH►i�:� of general`circulation by Judge G..K. Scovel in the Saperior Court s>.ta�_ tiara t!{q� of Grarse County; California August Z?th, 1937 by order No. A-5931. t* `_{'a�i'+nt``tr�tcnnrsciict�,:G�iitt:a�`at CTIOE OF . USE.-DISTRICT IC7 NEARING � _ �s� d >sat;►�r �, ,lid•-�lci 'csi That'>.fe pcetxzzr� c+ .caR.lOring,�• --ion ' !or i: : : Ibr " :,4 ► e; C!s ty:;+�*it nz of "A Z&E 04.5E : XdJ :66—? :�ts�. �tEns . at Ftetiden�ttilt:+- s3t'fi9 "R1' of which:the aiinexed-ls;:.0 R lhted copy, w B as published in said news- I =w�opi'rt/;�tacstAd' �: ah•�r 7h� aio�.::ci. I paper at leusL y = On +I B sue Liberty pvoet,-:�ppraw ►atetY."lowF" ~ weer ad: 9ar�x.h'-BtvEs��ati�" lY'`ti oth commencing from tho _ l day of March ,'7 :wr the Lct *r h_ � �`-ct.: 66 loth March 19,._, and ending on the _day of jAt} LLtare�: d' Ptrs.�rs_aawiisaciteu_i�s 5 v ;;pin{ans :for fl►rs�aii!5i a f{kZes:t►-:.Ci* R.:; 19 both days Inclusive, and ar, often during said period and Fdrther irrtoma4tioa a abtsin times of publication as bald parr.-r was regularly Issued, and In the frot:� t4i'-0ti.te' 4t,s�,,Clitrk. regulaiz and._entire Issite_.of._s:id__ncw.pnper .proper, and not In a ,''+• Ci'CY .N.1;�CTiiyiSh1 i31r.�ICtt ! supplement, and said notice waf publiyhecY therein on the following ` G� S�AIi� G•.lE'.�tES dates, to-wit: i x� City Clerk # '`arch 10 ; 1966 :. 117 _i f - Publisher .Subbscribed and sworn.to.before.ir,A this rl�t day o! 14 Notey Public Orange County. California ` L TriOMAS D. vrli'{,Lie •,: .. ,i`� NOTARY PU Lim {FOB;#IA PRINCIPAL OFFICE Ifi VRANGF OUfrn My Commission Expires Sapt. 1_ 1 66 f Alf Huntington Beach P1 C sior� >l City Hsli huntington Beach, California February 15, 1966 L E T T E R a F T R A N S N I T T A L .... _ — ._ — _ _. ._. - - - - - - - - - TO: HONCRAME MAYOR AYM CITY COWT,13IL, City of Huntington Beach, Calif. ATTN: Doyle Mller, City Administrator RE: RESOLUTION NO. G6-•7 , a resolution of the City Planning Commission recommew.Ung approval of Zone Case - 66-7, for an R-2 Two Family Residence` District: Gentlemen: Transmitted. herewith is a copy of Resolution No. 66--';, a resolution of the City' Planning Commission recommending approval of Zone Case 66-7. This case proposes. to change the zone on 0. 22 acres of land located on the north-- side of Liberty' Street approximately 10001 west of Beach Blvd. The City Planning . Commission held a public hearing on the matter February 15, 1966, at which: —time—"there was no one present to speak for" or against - the request. By unanimous , vote of the City Planning Commission, Zone Case 66-? •:eras approved and recommended:'to' your , Hon6mble Body for adcption. The Code provides that a' public hearing shall be held on the matter after whi:ch.' 'an or.din.ance . may' be adopted` effecting the change . Respec submitted., K.. A. Reynolds , Plannin_ Director and Secretary KAR/'r1b Encl : Resolution No. 66-7 1 I ' RESOLUTION NO i 66-7 RE6MUMMhJA or REOMMDAWON A RESOLUTION OF Tn ClEff- FLUMOG COMMSSTGR• of I THE -CiTr OF HMMNOTON, BEACH, CAI MESIA • . M.-MM ING APPROVAL UP ZONE CASE NO. 66--7 t AS QED, . 1 • W11 M A , 2'he City n Cammi.$s .an of the City of Huntington. Beech, California, has held one public hearin.-, in compliances with the State Gover=ent - CoC.9 in order to consider f ' i and review Zontj Cast_ 66--7, and . i• WMEM$ The City P"la=ing 0o=d a_8ion4 on the basin of i` .and use 'surveys, ,Master Flan of _Arter3 a1: Highways, Maste: Plan of Lend Tlee, existing zanf.ug and coneideratiox� given +v the general public , does find the following eonditioua to exist on the property outlined, .for a, change of- zone from R-4-X Suburbaa Residence Distric ' to R-3 Limited -Maltiple Family Residence Metrict: 1. Tha pr * peaty and Mnroun ling area -is master planned for medium density reeidautial use. 2. The property and m=roun.&Lng area is zoned County 2- 4 -M which is comparable td the City R-2 Zone; thus,� an R-2 Zone would t e apPropriatte. NOW THERMC}RE, BE IT r SOLD ' Section .1;. That the • City P1.aauing C .ssion,,- as a result of study and considerations concludes that the. read; property located on the north side of Liberty Street approximately 10001 west of Beach Blvd. and legally decaribed' as: The V? v of the SA of Lot 9, Tra' qt 411: Is hereby reeemended to Ve reclassifted 'b.f rom R-4-1 Sin$3.e Family Residence District to R-2 Two Family Residence District's 4ection 2: That the M7 Planning nning Commission recomends approval.- df' Zone Casa 66-7 to the City Council. Section 3 : Fae Seovetary sha.11 eezt�._�* sb.t� aL t�u., do ohs �Q adoption of this reso3.lation by the membere of the City Pla nag Commission. REGULARLY PAIS.-SRD AND ADOPTED by. the Aty Pianuing Commissi on Cls the City O unt .-'1gf;0I] Bertch, $lifo r—1 ;3L7 5 of Pebruary, by ;;he fo'lloY.ing roll oall i ote : XMI S : TjkWS, 0.XL CRAby).- HUMAN 7 NI • E .j VORTHY, BAY-IL, LA.REYS. •. ro P"GE8: RCS ABSENT: NQ�. - TIM, MOTION CARRIED. � I i t K, A..: Reynolds Robert D. Dazil Secretary Chai man �l'IJC� �iIlE Aff idayse rO$ nP. 4lIt9 't ,pof Opubfication- State of California` :sa.s'' f'�`S -�r¢Y of, I•l�ntirita,i_drrt,; County of, �+nOrge` ss ,m''`tr f 1 Char Sio a( City of Huntington Beach `trcv, ttur -toy`'* nct:i G9[rfcrt�ar'; ~ �f [itt�t�aut' s:f:`` aci�c.l% X S. Farquhar,.being-:duly sworn on oath, says: That .he-Is a citizen,.of the Unitc_d States, over the age of twenty-ono years. i1i0 ;F'CSlS1i £tl: `:*+(+�lb0ii; That""he"`Is the printer-iind nubiLgiier�of &e..Huntingion Beachne to fiaRill�tt News, a weekly newspaper of gon ral circulation'printed, published *ri;;rGiW=- t1ni-*VM1z oe,'£�trt it2=-um and. circulated In the said County of Orange and.-elsewhere and published for the dissemination of local and other'news'of a general '-'niitrlLi+►test t'� ha s. character, and has a bona fide subscription list of Payfns.subscribers, p -+�•t1f�►tRsern1. tt� lll�r On'��ltt. and said Paper pas been established; Printed and published :in the , --�•,�g ��fi,. : State of California, niid-County of Orange, for at.least one-yaar next ; ,d hi -sr um�at ir [a, or'.s before the ,publicatinn of the first'Insertion of this notice: and the �,ve •a�td 3 t*e[r� as faster said newspaper is not rievoted to the interest of, or; ublished iota_the . P entertainment of:any particular class; profession, trade, calling--race �,rr yia?9i�'+Cir' ` S+spef ittt:of or denominlition,'or any number therTof. The Yfuntingfon Bench News was adjudicated a legal of general circulation by Judge O. K. Scovel in the Superior Court. 4 �► - ..tctto:t of Orange County, California August 27th 1937 b order No. A-5931. lit ,.A- i��i' 4., L =Gf gas Y "_. .fib+`` NOTICE OF USE ..DISTRICT HEARING That tiie .ems ;gip i•T'E` �CA�SE= -T4O V,� 66—a a �+s :,;� a+sr�¢:+ . t:: -.,s ,►; _ � err �1�►►ir i+�(:��west ' _-irt of which 'the annexed Is:u prir`,-z:)py, was published in said news- ��D_�, .F � .t t'.b,of aow One:�:Iaaue Paper at least 10 t h Ma2'cYl � i��= .�-�r sir• '��, `, commencing from the day o[ 3 c : pte;nor .treof.. 66 10th March >' �tls�,sxcr��,pdtrsl,stf'.tand�iyi:� ` � 19--, and ending on the day of �n�#he saki ;t,,,� ;•l ttTi�ci :rye i7as%Y ,desttI�t ,ap�,Loif�s►s� y t 6 6 8ta�int�ing s�t:ties`; «xmte of ,•-1 19 both days inelvisive, and as often luring said period and times of publication as said paper was regularly issued, and In the =�"'d '' �_,�rtd ►as paper_. proper.. �Ut�ce:`aian�'t�'t�iM�,�no,a` gsid tom. regular.-and-entire'_issue of said news and not in t: sogplem-nt, and said notice-wig published therein on the followin i dnies, to-grit: t {> i tom::tht �i. �• s�t ,t March .10 .4 1966 . Z;fx =tip 1a,f3in_ nL of trs Inn nw =ln --my iS Publisher �uF r. ."yCowcyr# fir' Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of # :" `E cc �to:lac 'tf� -70f_ � `rTar'�'bT'Riyonaa�:a3Ft'��•+--�'?[` 'g4bt 'Ltsia� :ios�eti Notary Public ��• r. %u:id .% orange County, California ; >„ •=' %' it P# Okla 0670 LIE pfitlrMOTARY Pi DLIC - CA'iro m awl `=;Y; ' PZiPICIpiV OFF10E III ti �orwt `i'�tt n►er�suilM►>sitr� pt ORANGE UGUI fY ? My Commission Expires Sept. 13, 1966 ; Hunang o t n ;Bead. 'P1 nin Comnn*ssion a� g a�• .� P. O. Box 190 FMOR-2-1 PPROVED IIY CITY COUNCIL � 4� Cl� Hall ��. ' ' .�'• d Huntington Beach, Callfo:.iia _196fi February 15, 1966 �" ......_.. ciTx cLEXx L E T T E R O F T R A N S M I T T A L TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY - COUNCIL, City of Huntington Beach, Calif. ATTN: Doyle Miller, City Administ»ator RE: RESOLUTION NO. 66-8' a re solution of the City Planning g ..'omm ssion. recommending approval of Zone Case 66-8, for � sm R-1 Single. Family' Residence" District and C-2 Community Business District: Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith . is a copy of Resolution No. 66-8, a resolution of ?the -City Planning Commission reeummending approval of Zone Case 66-8 j This case gr op o s e s to change the zone on 17.43 acres of land I located on the east sidv of Brookhurst Street approximately 1600 feet south of Indianapolis Avenue from• R-2 Two Family Residence District to R=1 Single- Fam 1y Residence District and C-2 Community Business District.- The City Planning Commission held a - public hearing on the matter Febxhiary 15 , 1966, at which--�-time _ there - was no one present to speak for or against the -request: By unanimous vote of tfie City Planning Commission , Zone Case 66-8 * was approved and- recommended -to- your Honorable Body for adoption. The Code provides that R public hearing shah. be held on -the matter after which `an ordinance may be adopted effecting the change . Pespectfully submitted, / A K. A. Reynolds , Planning Director and Secreta17 K.AR/rlb Encl : Resolution No. 66-8 i ✓ 66-8 'lr'+TTIr7ct der r '*►-�^ ;� Wit- 03 H- M0•EEW BEACH, C. LIFG�V�, 07` ZONE CASE- NO. 66--S. . VIER :EA1�? 1 '7its. i; ;rr Pv az:.,it g Commission of tho City of has held one public hearing in campji ar-c.-9 r,��f{�'* 1^2Le Gove,=- aent Code in order to consider am.d. :��:r ew Ttit �Q Case 066-69 'and Zte �;,� ;c . "FI!a, Commi:sion, on the basis of Iand use aete:n P,!.& of Arterial Highways, Master Plan of Land, a,u , Q L:,�t- o ,consideration given to the genet al pub' �,c: , r e s the following conditions to exist oxx the projwrtf far change of zone from R-2 Two Family Residen.c e "ryiStrtet to ReN1 Single Family Residence. District and 0--2 Co�xr.L:r.L1�y :ci s .:,gas Dist:. c:t with set back, provii dons :. .� 1. �.cnwi,�i►�:�-* ro;— : n �enitative TrEet . `af app_ '"' 5978 was that ' the s: ^, ec_ ;, •- r oved to 11-1 Single Family 2. The change , to ;;-2 t y Business WA s rict involves a m3 ziex hound ::^; ad acst nf� of -he ^..xi sting 0,-2 Zone, NOW THEW-OI ; BE Tl' PyweOr Section 1: - That tn�s Ci r, a=jng Comm:.ssion, as a resu.1t of .et 'ely a-d con 4 eratior•, concludes that the real property Iceated or.. the -east side of Brookhumst Street approx-imately 1600 feet south' of Indianapolis - Parcel 1. Avenue and :Legally described as : A Parcel of. lend being :a part of the J. A. Day Tract, MN 1!•-5Q Recorr a of Ora g� County, Cal 3torniaj lY�-ng iA the AW--A- Section 8, T6S, R10W,. S. B. & M. , Ci ty . o t' R•A.Ll.�tgfc►1Y Beach.8c�+ , Count n f Orange , State of CaliforhAa. more partierlarly leseribed as followis: Toll Y-.%►..:s::.1f Y..I a' '.7�:.1 X.S. !'.I.72. .a--•• -... ...r . •- All of those partiorm of Lots 39 4, and 5 of the said J. A. Day Tract lying waterly of the west y line of ' the. I80 foot easement 3960-339 0. R. and south of a lime having a bearing, of. N 89036 t ZO" E whore ;westerly terminus lies 11 00034150111 W. 1470.97 feet north of--.`the - 5W corner of said Section 8. Except .the north 504 feet thereof . also ex.,_-ept a parcel of land lying in the said J, A. Day Tract :more particularly. described as fo?lows : Beginning � at the SW4 corner of said Section 8 and proceeding thence `alo31696 the' -west line of said Section 3 N 000 3k! 5a" v f east ; thence N 89036210'�B, 416.90 r feet ; thence .S 11033154" W 0.o.59 feet is o a ;point on the scutb: line of said' section . 8 ; thence along the scuth line of said Section- a. S 89°35' 35'' �, 312 .40 feet to the point of beginning. Parcel 2. A parcel of land in the City of Huntington Beach, Com ty of 4reng2, California, being a part of Lot 5 1 _ of the . :S. A. Day Tract gerangp r map recorded in Bonk 4, Pa_qe 50, M41. records- o Ccunty,, California bein : the W,t of the �u--t of f ractiona�l Section 8, T6S iOd, S.B.M. per map- recorded In Book 51, Page 14, I lei Records of `O,snge County, California more particularll described as follows: ;�. Beginni n .at the 9WA corner of said Section 8 and II proceeding . thence $loner the west Line of said Section 8, IN 000341 S+o'$ W 485.96 feet ; thence N 89036110" E. 416.90* feet ; t1nnce: S 111033154" . Wil 496.69 feet to a int on. the south. line - of said .Section 8 thence� alon e 'adth' .line ,of' said'-Serti3�n fi; S' 89035 35"= ; 312 .40 feet-' do the•,:point*-of beginalbg-�' eontai.ni.ng 4-A gross nacres more- or leas.. Except the west 305 feet of the south 459 feat of the SW-A of said Section Be i is hereby recommended to be reclassified from R-2 w Family Residence Di crict to R-1 Single Family Residence District. and C.-2 Cown unity Business District with setbacks' provisions . Section 2: That the City Phoning Commission reccm)ends approval of Zone Case 66-8 to the City Council. Section 3. The Secretary sha1.l certify and attest to the adap.A.an of this resolution by the uwmbers of the City Planning Commission. 1 r • I JIM I?OPT.c D byr the Ci-r,;? Plan-irk, •,`�• �f;II117:.'`r.4�=s .f11: '3:f' i;_'3.E �:1 ,' Df l:liirt �..ixt;on �?�C�? on the ♦ yi da7 A �;�b '<Iri: , 1�66, ?;y t a foilow".ng roll �1.-1�_ vo c: : i i A R } : r.Ale-130N , CRAPB , 1BA I.1i ; UaUMN , WORMC, �I ATTEST : r, As., 3r=o c s 106eFT TT as z i� I I - i t i N i:�` Affidaviof %blication ................ :' ". State n Califcrnlu 1 0 ���i� 1� 11, County oE.Oran$e _ „= z City of Huntington I3Aach J. S.`Farquhra%:' being.- wy. sworn on oath, says: That he. is a . citizen of..the .United States._over the appe of twenty-one years. y ` 1 Ttidt`he the is� printer' and"publisher'-of the. Huntington. Reach � News, a weekly newspapergeneral of circulation._prant ed..pubus d he and circulated- in the said County. of Orange rnd elscrirhere -and cublished for the dissemination of local and other news of a general haracter, tnd has a bona fide subscription`list.nt paying subscribers. � �`' and said paper has been established, printed`-atxl published i.� the "� State of California;and County t+f Orange, for at least one year next �tt` # Ft before the pubiicaffcn,'of the first inser+lon of this notice; and the t.• -w, said r..ewspaper is not devoted to the ir.Lrrest of, or published for the 0 nir^J�# tElr`wi;h entertainment of any purUcuIar.class, profession, trade, calling, race44-{ k. .'c11= �ktsteti or denomination',-or any number thereof. '" s�� � The Huntington Beach News was adjudicated a legal newspaper � 1d t r,< of general circulation by Judge G. K. Scovel in the Superior Court i' "``p;—*-p W.!"ti 7' of Orange County,-Califcrnia'August 27th,`1537 by order No. A-5931. • 71sa :' Batt' a; S�stiarr =3s, - M 7&OVA4 hi0)S:+�utq`PAJ1gt 21 FVlf�ii�s ' �Ia"1'�p- I�n�tp ri�,M s'tflisi�=,CIEfGi�, = :The `tie . NOTICE ,OF US&, DISTRICT HEARING t : , - rZ0i4I CASE �'i0, 66-9 �� ro•�aet-' caaai� !� of which the annexed Is:'a. copy, was published in said news- '�u►.i1�kaJrk�r d1 ° ; - , rear at;saved, matt _: ;z. . . . One.. .-Issue paper at least `�atri�' ttc,a 24th March commencing f rom the day of Vic. m}� y�f3{ t04 19 and ending on the day of f- Ch ' 'D� 33d .fieClrT .35,r i 19 both days inclusive, and as often during said period and times of publication as said'paper wcs regularly Issued. and-in the regular- and,-enthv-,Issue-of.said_ newspuper proper. and not Ina Supplement, and said notice-was-published therein on the following Akf►+E ;4"1* 9f? d ntes, to-wit: st C»rrsste�: 1a;d_''.a�t :�+�: i f ih` `�iM ilf, i�i:It1:AlYt:out oriA! � ._ •1 - tC s$4Z'e � CfiOiF�'1� ;. �� _r r".-,.,�`-� 't�''#ii 1 PublLsher f � a€*atai�5est,a[�f .i Subscribed and sworn to.before-me this �� day of ' "jet`; - ' ��-`'l `= 4 4�l, Notary Public t=.; a+ rV Vvi 4 a 7 4AL aa Orange County, fornla W THOMAS D. WYLLIE NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFQRNI � pica r PRRICiPAL CFFiCE ,'fi T~" 11�1AD�+ctrrf .t _LR=BoI�A r 0ARIGE Ct?U t Al�� �MtiCils» ost moo My Co'n6iWicn Expirc*.kept. 13t:1 iYr --- && , 1 3^'` -}�.l r t . - swi 7 f., Hunfingt6n Be d PI nUe.. Corn sion P. Q. Box 190 Cfty Him DE un ington Bcach, CaliforniaOfo Y CUh AIL ----_- _ r � � 9 _ _.... March 21 , 1`?66 -......-.._.:.�.... NIAR r.. 4 OF TRANSMIT ........ ... 9 ...�. �� .�� �- �� w .� �_ i. wp �� - To: RONORABLE .MAYOI? AND -CITY .COUNCIL, CITY . OF IFMTTINGTON BEACH. ATTY: DOYLE MILLER;- CITY ADMINISTRATOR RE;RESOLUTION Na, 66--9, a resolution o f the City Planning Com nis'sion- reeammending den al of. Zone Case 66-9 from FI I-A RestricL.ed ;,Manufacturing -District to I 1 Single- # Family Residence--' Dis tri-ct.. and' C-1 Neighborhood Commercial District with'= setback=provIsions Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith is a copy' cf Resolution Ile. 66-9, a resolution of" the City. Panning Commission 2:ecommending denial of Zone Case 6&-9 0 This oaae proposes tc change the zone on approximately 158 acres o4' la'nd',located on: tl:e crest side of Springdale Street , between. Edinger- aud' ,'McFadden*. A.ve:tues - The City Planning . Commission., held a public hearing on the matter March 1 , 1466', at which time Lthe Secra•Uary read five letters of protest to the request an on.e * communication infavor-' cif the proposed zone change,., Also five persons spoke in favor .end four spoke against=-the r e que s t;, Zone Case 66-9 was denied and reconmend,ed to your Honorable Body for denial. by the following roll call vote of the City _ Planning Commi.ssion: .AYES:' Bazil, l.-a,.rkin., Kaufman, Crabb, Worthy, Lawson NOES Miller ABS'INT: I+tjne The Code provides that this matter may be denied without holding a publi:c' hearing; Respectfully -vu�bmitted . r K. A. Reynolds , Planning .70irector. and. Secretary KKR/rlb Fncl : Resolution No - 66--9 r,SvLUr1"10 ( r' ':TCat`ENI DA'.t'I'ON j �. R.�SC1�,It!'! r✓i1 0�' nil `i�.c T r'LA� �TI'rJG CGi: '?T ��L�rt'1 i CI THE CITY OF Elti�7TrX.G'1 ON R-P&Cii . CAL i r ORN A , RFC0IMFEND 1 NG DENIAL Or LONE CASE 6':-- 1 WHEREAS , he City Planning Commission 0-f the City i of Huntington reach , California , has one p711blic ! bearing, Y L compli auce wit r: 'one State G;o vrernmeiit Code in. order :o consider anal rev--: e:1 ?rune Case GG y , a ad I f{HEREFAS 111 ie Cir.y Planning Commission, on tae basis of t ai.0 use aoxveys , 14aster Flan. of Axterial Hiir:aways, PI-A s.ter= Plat. of Land. Vfie existing, zoLiug and - considr ration I. cn to ,he q-eraeral purl-i.c , does fl.rd the f:i'1 owfnr, cnndi, t;�o-as Un ex_.f sr. cn the property ouflixiea for a ciiange of zone from M--1 --A Restricted Ma.uuLactt:ri rg District to E- Sin ;I e r a2!(il-y Re 3idence District and C-1. llei6b_ Uorbood Coiumerc.zal DiSLric , wirn setback pro-1risi.ons : The ;`3a:,fer Plan of Land Vse , which ],as been in j exi � =.mace i'cr sett eras years, delineates the area for �f induLixial.. ase. 2. The bb rde:. is on the appi.icant to show that the Master P-lan of Land Use is arbitrary and capric�cus aid Le Las fai le4 to do so.. �I ?l . `-tne aPP1.lcant a f a i I c d to Just;ifT. his reasons fo,r rbe rc giaesi:. 4 . Of all the iudu s tr i al. property 'L.L1 rfun t ingrou Beach, the subject pnrce ! is the choicest . i NOW. '.H-F.RIMIFORE, BE TT RESOLVED Section 1 : That the City Plann: 1g Commission, as a f result of and eoLsi-ae-ration, ceacl.Ldes that the Leal grope-=y ioca fed on th,. west c4. Sn.rs ,,d�ile Street , be tweeu Edii_;zer I and sicrrdde A:venues and lu ally dOECT iced as ; I i #1 Tne South Half of Section 16 � '1':Z'I3_Sb-iP South , Range 11 �de st , i a the Rar:c ho L-aa. Do] sa Chic a , Cites o fHurt. i.ngton Beach , County of 'Orange . State of Galifor_-o L a , as per reap recorded it BooEr. r+l , Page 13 of MiSp:eli aneous Maps . in, the office of: t-Itie County Pecos deT oIL said County. a-xcepL • TL,,4 w►nst half of iLie &--)ull'ihwe.7t G':uar te.r of Saia sect-,'ou 1.6. iLlso The :rest 1054 feelb wore or legs of ;I:e ►outb 130 feet of rbe east hair- c± SoutL_ west Quarter of said Section 16 - Also except : Tue east 266 ieei. of the soiith 480 I'eet of the Sov.tbwe.st of Said Section 16. Also e:_:;ept . `!Ie west; C-8 feet. o i- the =Soul--It 1[81() -e et of the Sr theist Quar�;r�L of said Sectior 16. Alz�o e_:cerT. : The east 592 ;Left more or lees of t�,� ou-cn fee-! of the "out1twc •r, Quarter . &:;uvi est Qu—Ei er, So :ctheast Quarter of said -er_ ;;lon 16. Allso oxeept = The east three Quaj.-ters of the t oljth half of :h.e LE':outheast .tarter o,' said � Sectiort 16^ AlSo except : The East; .feet o i• the North half oL ti-Le Sr u-thca. L llart@r Ci : s21C.c AFC t1C)T 165-- �C. Tne eas,., G62 -eer LoZ'- or less of rh-71* !'North 23U f ee4 I•itt3_T`F or less of t v1 :4-ht��?3t Quarter of S a3.d '�ect;ic)a�_rV. ii-lZ-v e Ce-D-L " Tte west JSu ieet more or less of !' .e ►_'!o-t'il 2'')0 teet !AorF, or le%ss o-' tf�' "oUtheast Qua�tar 1 r The Las:: 262 -Ifeet more or of h p Wor-th 230 f � morc o-- less o riti'; Quarter of 16 , Tcva-srtip Soui- Piinge 11 West , in the RaL,:,d I.a Bollsa Cthica Civ---r of Hun ting i-On F3eaeb i C'C t1 )t-- n OrF' age State of Cali f orrii-a as per!nap reco t•c.ea an 3oUi� 1 7 7 fi s t��.�c,c r, -- r c � � , page. ,.� o.R cJ.l-.reou . i.u7.� _a� the ofriec of the Counts Pecorder o sryd Lois-n-ty. !slo : The we s-t- 968 feet more or ,� ' Nortia 230 more or less o--" Quarter of said Sects or_ 10"" . i is sot r ecoLumended fo: from M-1-A R-st►ricted klanufactur.Lr►-g R--1 Six,gr,1e Fami_i.y Peci.deriF�a -Di-jtf'i c t- ._ld C-1 Neigyhhornood Coi::merci.al DIECric L I 1 1 i r• • Ij• L City _ T t �- (•. Sec.r io.� 2 �..a � Lrf Gi �,, Pla._ni r.g Commissi os� _ e ,omstuds i aeoia: oi• Zolie Case 66-9 to the City Council . Sec uan 3 : Isle 6ecrcr. r j shall certify and. at,-L.0,r, i o the Adoption. of this resolutiou by, the members of the City P i ai}.air CLmmi s ion*. R GUA.R.LI' PASSED AND A-DI OPTED by the C-ry PI Pommiss;,Qn of the Ci ry of H::•,tj.ngr.on Peacf• . C�' f foy-aia, or. the .ist day of 19166 , by the follcvnng roil tail A w':� : RA.�' i�, f,1 z�1 , TrN��r-U-11 , Crs�8 , VIORT9 Y , ZAWS-ON Ij0F.S : MIL LER i j-hBENT ' NOME i -- • ��, N�ey:,oZds. .cbt;r t Rra.�.Zr: Sr r-re-rary Chairman t I I II � March 30, ia66 The Honorable City Council City of Huntington Beach City Hall Huntington Peach, California Re : Proposed Zone Change No . 01-6-9 Gentlemen : The purpose of this letter is to explain the background of my request and the request of my cctrustee and co-owner, Bank of America National Trust and Savings � Association, that a portion of our Huntington Beach II Industrial Park be rezoned from M-lA to R-1 . I As perhaps ycu kncwr, the Peck family interests In the Huntington. Beach area go way back to the days of Anaheim Sugar Compa:iy . i,[hQn the sugar business was given up , decades , ago, much of its land was acquired by my deceased father-in-law., who had been a founder and prin- cipal shareholder. The properties we still own in the area go back to that date . Ply late husband, Aldrich Peck, and I retained these properties during the many intervening years , leas- ing them out for agricultural use . This produced a mini- mal return, cnuch below that whicb might have been d2r�.ved from other types of investment . We adjusted our standard of living to this situation. Tragically, my ht?sband ' s death occurred when Orange County was on the verge of an era of great change and development . r- After Mr . Peck ' s decease my cotrustee and I. with the help of real estate experts , Engineers end pro- f essior_al planners , determined to devote the largest ;parcel of the property to the deve:. opment of a beautiful industrial park, and to lease this park to many industrial tenants , thereby providing for my descendants a steady and reliable source of income while at the same time providing a substantial asset for the Huntington Beach area . - Toward this end we . on May 95 1958, caused the property to be annexed to the City of Huntington Beach #2 - The Honorable City Council - 3/30066 City of Huntington Beach because we believed ghat having the property included with- in the city limits of this progressive ; yell-administered city would be not oni.7 conducive to its development b'jt also of benefit to all proper,y ovmers in the area . We engaged Quinton Engineers to make a thorough study of the parcel, and to plan the introduction of util- ities , the lay-out of streets and railroad trackage , the i installation of drainage and sewer, and other related items . They advised that for various reasons the development, improvement and utilization of the property should begin at the north, and grow toward the south as demand should :Jar-- rant . We adopted and have followed this advice . 1 At all times since the industrial zoning was � granted , through R. A . Rowan & Company and others , we have j made every effort to procure substantial tenants for our industrial park. Our efforts were described in the testi- mony before t -e Huntington Beach Planning Commission . These efforts have resulted in the acquisition of one major and substantial tenant , Douglas Aircraft Company, but have otherwise so far been a failure . We believe that the failure to procure additional tenants is the result of two factors : The first factor is the very substantial compe- tition with respect to industrial sites in tre area, par- ticularly the Irvine Ranch . The existence of this competi- tion is of course completely beyond our control . The second factor discouraging additional indus- trial tenants is the fact that we determined not to offer industrial sites for sale but only for long-term leas: . It is important to note that even if we should be other- wise inclined to deviate from this policy, tax considera- tions absolutely preclude any such deviation. Should we enter into a program involving the sale of industrial tracts in -the normal course of business, the proceeds from sucl. sale would be subject to ordinary income taxes , rather than. capital gains taxes, with the result that most of what Mr . peck and I. and previously his father, have built up these many years would be lost . i ,F - The Honorable City Council - 3/3C,/66 City of Huntington Beach Our industrial park: now contains approximately 440 acres of undeveloped property . The southerly 165 acres of this property constitute the subject of our application for rezoning. According to the ad v ice we have received from authorities in the field of industrial development , there is no reasonable probability that these 165 acres will be developed for industrial use in the pre- dictable future . There is just tors much industrial proper- J ty available in the Orange County area at the present time , particularly in view of the fact that our property can be offered only for long-term lease . At the same time we are by no means pessimistic concerning the development of the remaining northerly 275 acres of our industrial tract . This northerly property is re aLively well-situated and is close to -the Douglas de- velopment . We believe with the continuation of our serious efforts to lease the property, coupled with our offer to construct the required facilities at our cost, we will relatively soon be able to effect substantial industrial development, in this northerly area . On the other hand , as stated , we are firmly con- vinced teat the southerly 165 acres will not be indus+rially developed within the foreseeable future . Under these cir- cumstances , it is possible for us to terminate our invest- ment in these 165 acres withouti adverse (vfhieh is to say, ordinary income ) tax consequences if, but only if, the entire acreage is sold in :one piece . F We are certainly aware of the fact that the tax base of the City of Huntington Beach would be improved_ if this property were to be sold to an industrial user . This would also certainly be a p.ef Arable course from our stand- point . Please be assured than we have thoroughly investi- gated this possibility and that we are firmly convinced there i.s , and will be, no such industrial purchaser avail- able now or in the fore{ -cable future . The only possible Ftype of purchaser for this property at the present time is a developer who is able to subdivide the property . As you know, we have found such a purchaser in Doyle Development r Company . In reluctantly reaching our decision to abandon our plans for the industrial development of these 165 acres # - The Honorable City Council - 3/30/66 City of Huntington Beach we have considered, among others , the following facts : 1 . There are available in the fore- seeable future no industrial lessees, and no one industrial prrchaser, for the subject property. 2 . The subject property is virtually surrounded by residential property and is therefore appropriate for R-1 zoning. 3 . The development contemplated by Doyle Development Company involves homes in the middle-price bracket, attractive to Junior and middle executives . We feel that this will enhance our possibilities of industrially developing the northerly %75 i acres . 4 . Any increased burden on the Huntington Beach School System will be offset by an in- crease in the tax base . It seems to us com- pletely useless to compare tnis ' increase in the taf base and its effect upon the school situa- tion with the results of industrial development of the property . We are convinced that in the foreseeable future there is not going to be any industrial development of the property, and therefore the appropriate comparison is between residential property and bare land . 5 . We reed large amounts of cash if we are to continue to offer to construct, at our expense, industrial facilities for potential lessees of the remainder of the industrial park. In order to accommodate the Douglas Aircraft Company development, it has been necesoary for us to invest additional amounts of cash in excess of $1,000,OOC . We frankly need this sale to Doyle Development Company,`' to replenish our cash reserves . I have been very impressed over these many years vrith the spirit of cooperation which has prevailed between #5 - The Honorable City Council - 3/30/66 City of Huntington Beach us and the City of Huntington Beach . Although I am not a resident of your city, I own a great deal of property within your city limits and for that reason I tun as interested as you are in the orderly and successful development of Huntington Beach . For this reason I hope that you will agree that when we First requested and re- � ceived a zone change pursuant to which the subject j property was zoned M-!A.,, we embarked on a program which has now proved to be too ambi.tious, and that subsequent developments clearly indicate that the rezoning of these 16� acres to H-1 is not only realistic but also the best manner in which to continue the city ' s progress . 1 Very truly yours, � Z' Dorothy T . Flynn Dorothy T . Peck Flynn t- Affidav#.Of tPubfication State of California County of'Orange ss City of Huntington Bench J. S. Farquhar,'being duly sworn on oath, says: That he 13 a citizen of the United States, over thi- age of twenty-one y F`�ri„ , &#Qn a�� N�»y� That he is the printer hnd'publ!slter of the 1-iunting&n IIc •-h l in c:r : 1r..lfl . th News, a weekly r,�wspaper of beneral circulation printed, public! .d and circulated in the said County of Orange and elsewhere and a "' xo� ASL "Ho. t>a•�o published for the dissemination of local and other news of a general 10 kEnay . GIVEN th4t" a character, and has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscrilvrs, trutsic'hea�irl� vt;�i'to hard �Y the:C1. and said paper has been established, printed and published in the C n.�-t16�6 of'.th�.ctty-ot_Huntin�tan Eeach, , ii, Chamber:ct. :t:a.clir state of Califor,.:a. and County of Orange, for at )coat one. year next t; itet� y,�►tfri tbs�'UMS11, Girl;tc+ri�fa ax before the publication of the first insertion of this notlre; and the jlte> #rratrr :oF 7c30 'Q'ciccx .quid newspaper is not devoted to the Interest nf, or published for the "t�clott cx r po;sit;ie, on' Monda/, e,,te;talnntrnt of tiny lrlrticulitr clrs�sn, l3rnft�r.::it,n, trnclu, calling. riic:► A{{lf, . ,"'or tr a-pure or denominntion, or any nurnber thereot, -1 5a1. .tc ' titi e -n�titf�ri tvr' ,t r W1 11k of. JOB ' ttw ttFf�uts7tiQ►i", of: Wit The Huntington Beach News was ndjudicated a legal newspaper atrr'--J1,11:ors.Enar►co, irottl 4i* Y,Ira �:..r.►. of general circulation by Judge G. K. Sco.•el in the Superior Court t��,3' rricd"tlttl;tct to, 111 Sing,e Fagg.. of Orange County, California August 27th, 19.3 by order No. A-5931. 'p,operty,_totats�! G;trtJ`It, r+S nstScOtU`tii 4Z:19 'aV14all .A ven9,c, 6z0 e6FAI tn yin ,- :t3l 6 ra � rN-d-NrT CE 0F U � EARINGt That the Z')MF, CASE N0. 66-10 -r?!te"�t: R#I #ntar atetf; r.~.ens_'arc :nvitrt to of which the annexed is a printed co was published in said news- t ' - t`t t` '`ln�`;'' , i✓rps;"their_ P PY� ssi:� {sb iaror.'rsgans: sa:� Zon- Casa, One .!. S 6ue fts e:.•lmorrra#1a., :s*uy. be obtain d paper at least -- fro„m 1the'ofrle*of tha any chorx \R� •r rr�. y1� FatW i'fViarrf7',;22 .-l�J. - - 2'Pth Ma•. sJ J commencing from the 1 day of ;,� ctry Ii�NTINGTON WFACIJ. 8y t'a4t..::-jor4E.S 66 24tr• March 19 , and ending on the j 1a:r of 19 66 . both days inclusive. and as often during said petled and times of publication as said paper was regularly issued, and in the regular- and entire issue of said newspaper proper, ar?d not in a thrref on the followinn supplement, and said notice was publishedn n dates, to-wit: t-ia rc,r. 24, 1966 �7 9 ..::. 7. �-sue Publisher Subscribed and.sworn to before me this day of �1� -7�iL :�,•� -,� ;L-7_��„ Lr Notary Public Orange County, California THOMAS D. WYLLIE Q.� �^: {�. r ofn r 1 JGL1C • CAl.1rQR-11A c � PivicippL o F(CE l'1 + 0P.ArIGE COW( My CQiritill,'iSlOn Expiros Sept. 13, 1966 Hai ac . AP Sio P. o. Bex 190 mph?.C7VED III- r j_I. � G -- _�� L`di� H�13 4 1� 1 O�..1 C!i. T_ (0 _ 3sa 'nFWrA Beach, CallfomiaMAR 2112166 T 1 _-- _________- ch ?l, 1966 C1T CLER$ L E T T E R O F T R A N S K I T T A L TO : HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF HTAgTINGTON BEACH. ATTN: DOYLE MILLER, CITY ADMINISTRATOR RE: RESOLUTION NO. 66-1.0 , a resolution of the City Planning Commission recommending approval of Zone Case 66-10 from R-2 Two Family Residence District to R-]. Single Family Residence District. Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith is a copy of Resolution No. 66-10, a resolution- of the City Planni.-ng Commission. recommending approval. of Zone Case 66-7 0. This case proposes to change the zone on approximately 10 acres of land located on the south side of Heil Avenue , 660 feet east of Algonquin Street. The City Planning Commission held a public hearing on the matter March 1 , 1966, at which time there was no one present to speak for or against the request. By unanimous vote of the City Planning Commission, Zone Case 66-10 was approved and recommended' to your Honorable Body for adoption. The Code provides that a public hearing shall be held on the matter after which an ordinance may be adopted. effecting the change. Respectfully submitted, K. A. Reynolds , Planning Director and Secretary KAR/rlb Encl : Resolution. No . 66-10 i ,I RESOLUTION NO. 66-10 RESOLUTION OF RECOM3'IEIMD.ATION A RESOLUTIOV OF THE CITY PLAIMI I1FG "0:11"MISS10N OF THE CITE' Or, HUNTINGTON BEAM, CALIFORNIA, Rst,R0l'IIMgD3:NG APPROVAL 0 ZONE CASE 66 -10. 'AREAS,, The Cite Planning Commission of the City of Huntins v-n Beams_ ., Call .forn.ia, has held one." rublic hpdning in covpl,iance 1with the State Government Code in order to consider and review Zoue tease 66-10, and. WREMAS , '1''he City Planning Commission, on the basis c.p lane. - - "- surveys, rjaster Plan of Arterial Highways, Plaster Plan of nand Use , existing zoning and coLsideration Fiven to the general public , does find the following con- ditions to exist on, the property outlined ,for a change of zone from R-2 Two Paml ly Residence District to R--1 Single Family Residence District 1. The proposed use of the property and zone will be compatible. ITOW , ?TFEREFOIRY, BE TT RESOMED • i Section 1 ; That the GiVy Planning Commission, as a j result of study and opasideration, concludes what thA read. nropert-T. ? ncated on the south side of Heil Avenue 660 feet east of AlSon.T•�ain Street and legally described as : The East half, North half, Northwest Quarter, 0outheast C: uarter. ; Sect-ion 20--j--1.`1 . Lc Jlercby recow.4ended to be reclassified from R--2 Two Family Re s i denc a District to R-1 Single Family Residence District. .moo r a . w R Section 2 : That the City Plzmni g Commission recommends aDp roval of Zone Case 66-10 to the City Couneil . Sec-vi on 3 : The-!Secretary shall certify and attest to the ac eption of' tip.s resolution by bhe members big the City Planning Commission., REGULARLY PASSED .�j., TD ADOPTED b7 the City Planning Co -mid ssion of the City of Hunti-ugton Beach; California, on tiie 1st day of March., iQ66 by the following roll call vote : A, r S : .1..2AWa-7 V1`t * BAZT.1J 3 CRA13B, i11iMIA , WORTH i $ DILL Y n t LARX I N• NOES: NONE 0SENT: 3,ONE A.1TESIm . - I CFcretary (;ha;rman Affidav# of State of California County of.OrangE.• itT ;f flit '.I'1;5i IiL7 #ca3i.l; _, City of Huntington Beach - - nay.--. That ii��.`^+Cll�.+a LVY .;. S. ::rQuhal•,- being duly sworn oi� o:�th, y..• �,�r.t he 13 E t , r�''ff�?•�'�TN1L vtetl 'tea.he.ci �s. titia CiiY-: ritizen of the United States, over the age of twent;►-one year. (~..cs►i*sf� L- .� rt- of Hunt�a�tan ter s� : Tent'he is the printer and piflilisher of the Itunitngton ,'aach 1w,11is ptzt,,} Ct�nScr ,�; strs Ct i"c. NL%vs, a weekly newspaper of general circulation printed. ,published Hu , bon 'c1�k tc`.n`2,�t, an,. circulnted :: ts±c saik'a County of Orange and elsewhere and � "� published for the dissemi7atlon of local inn ;ther news of a eneral �sccn'thar�r;�'°''� ��1bre,-c"•''��itday. 1= $ Goo •*`:r-sf9y ' merit, l?oS:=tor bje-pur- . character, and has a hucrr fide zubscAption list of paying subscribers, and snid paper hnK been cstnbilshed, printed and published in the State of O lifornia, rind County of Orange, {or at lea-st one year next ris!6,-,tjig ;:of►hr�r-a ;-sro•n' •A z r�� '. before the publictitlan of the first Insertion of thLs notice; and the I dtri7ial ArrricLrtui�t� said newspaper is not devoted to the Interest of, or published for the qT -Fitmi=� entertainment of any particultar class, profession, train, calling, ru4:e 'its ';IftiAf!'yrci�ity f€�3dsiyta t:�:sa1 tin or denomination or any number thereof. sL7ea'�C'•CrmuStt�. t3ttxsRs fl.stc' Ith .a�.tt�rtw•y •-.. y�L-.aitrl The Huntington Beach Ne-:rs was adjudicated a l?gal newspaper ct:.atecf ;r: �r =rtarn+r�t::tirrRt, c of general circulation. by Judge C. N. Scovel in the Superior Court FI&It ,`pfcgic�;;zr of Orange County, California August 27th, 1937 by order No. A-5931. 3 ieealty _otycribcd'as fojjVWS. M-A -to.;' r {� r•T,,•T �j Tt _y •���•r _ ` ---fCefl,,.L,)°Of-Lie-: : , �t That tllf� N O i , CE O L- USE D+.�J ►ii.`��. �� : .i j�� -4�}$ •��i�Isa L` JL..i7Qn .�'� i~tR�Ei.` Itics, .�, -IR ors to Rom). Tt:r `S. 22� -.�rt of the t-. W lrr_t of which the annexed is a printed copy, was published in said news- PAR(:- �n,A paper at least one Issue ___ � 2-z-111 cx.l�s tt�o r: -spa �Gt = of said it•er c I All a f =o inrres'.t.!'= rson , m ifiviled-to commencing from the _ 2 uh day of c;tte:+d said :tl,nng artd ,exarrste (Z[j ?nth iarc:t o;,ir=oFT$ iqr (rf Jlf3iR5t ,aid '.ono ;Case, 19 66 and ending on the dry of r;lfih infor�n:lon .may w` otltatn�d-: TiCm tha of ,�`a'i�.yy1y,ine.city ciert � ;r both days inclusive, and as often during said rcr►od and Cii'`r:QT_ fitir�3iNGTQ;�G. E3iC,y: tit.:zs of publication as said paper was regularly issued. and in the f ;�>,`� !�,. ,„ :G. 1L1tii:S regular and entire Issue of said newspaper proper, used not in a L ''�0.�ic.•� supplement, and said notice was published therein on the foIlo-An; dates, to-wit: March 249 1966 pezoutO r.-- L ,r Publis;:er !.� jy� - Subscribed and sworn to before ine this "7 — day of INTOt r Public 1 Orange County, California THONIAS Q. S',IYLLIE �.� "OTAaY puLtIC - C+�t FORTItA _ PR}'C `ICE IN [3,�: I7n:. C�t� Mt3Tii`f 1 i --- - My G:fir,?i�ion`piros Sep . .sS'';'���5's-'°''� �' / - Zaivr A A. �.� _d�1.i oft Beach P1 g Commission u APr-:4VBD BY �1i p•e s� w� at-, Malt CITY COUNCIL Hur_ 'nzton Beact:, California P D '(Q------ ------- jit iJ � .-...... 19 IWA R_ _ Aa cn 21, 196 pL CITY CLERK F T R A. N S TO : HON01W315E MAYOR AND CITY COINGIL, CITY Or' HUNTINGTON BEACH. ATTN : DOYLE MILLER , CITY ADMINISTRATOR. RE: RESOLUTION NO. 66-11 , a resolution of the City. Planning Commission recommending denial of Zone Case 66-11 from R-A Residential Agriculti=al District to R-1 Single Family Residence District, R-3 Limited Multiple Family Residence District and C- 2 Community Business D'isttict with setback Provisions. Gentleman : Transmitted herewith is a copy of Resolution No . 66-11 , a resolution of the City Planning Commission recommending denial of Zone Case 66-11 . This case proposes tc change the Zone on 80 acres of land Located on the east side of Goldenwest Street , between Edinger and Heil Avenues. The City Planning Commission held a public hearing on the matter March 1. , 1966, at which time two -occo le spoke in favor of the change . By majoy,1.ty vote of -the City Planning Commission, Zone Ca;:e 66-11 was denied and recommended to your Honorable Body for denial.' by the following roll call vote of the City Planning Commission: AYES : Bazil , Larkin, Kaufman; Crabb , Worthy, Lawson. NOES : Miller ABSENT : None The Code provides that this matter may be denied irithout holding a public hearing. Respegtfully�submitted., K. A. Reynolds , Planning Director and Secretary t ! KAR/rlb Encl : Resolution No. 6E-11 i RESGUU•TION NG. 13-6-11 RESOLUTION OF RECOI"R' MATION � A REaOLi TION OP THE CITY PLAIMING 00119 ISSION OF THE CITY OF I-fMiTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA , { PECOi;MMING DENTAL nF ZOIUE CASE 66-110 MITERVUS , The '.ity Plying Commission of the C'_tp of Hixntington Beach, California, h'aa 'held one public hearing in compliance with Lhe State Government Code in order to consider asid Teview ""tine CaP.e 66-11, and MI"FREA43 , `Mv, Cl.ty Planning Commission , on the bania of lend use: stirzreys, Master Plar. of Arterial highways, I asto r Plan of ,:and Use , existing a onine s nd c,nsi deration given to the general pu, -a , doers find the following conditions to ex3.st :x:i the property outlined for a change of zone from R-A Residential Agricult-ura1 District to R-1 Single Pamily Residence District , R-3 Limited Multiple Family Residence Districts and C-2 Community Business District with setback provisions : 1 . The proposer zone change does not conform to the adopted Master Plan of Land Use. NOW , THER�'OPX i BE IT :-30LVED Section 1 : That the it�r Planner Commission, as a result of study and consideration. concludes that the real property located east of Golden- wsst Street, between Edinger and Heil A:renuos and legally described as : Parcel #1 The North 350 feet of the Ides t Half, north-- • •greet Quarter Section 23-5-11 . t Par c e! #? r• The South 290 feet o+ the North 640 feet of the Test half, Northwest Qaasrt �r, Section Parcel3 The West half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 23-5-11 , Except the North 640 feet of 8&id W:;st half is hereby not recommended for reclassification from R-A Residential AgrlcuIt-i raI District to R-I Single Family Residence Dietrict, R•-3 Lim�_ted rittltip3e F�imily Residence District iund C-2 Com-munity Business District. Section 2: That the City Planning Commission recommends denial of Zone Case 165-11 to the City Council . Section 3 : The Secretary shall certify and attest ~o the adoption of this resolution by the members of the City Planning Commission. REGUIARLY PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City. Flanning Commission of the City of H-ant{rgton BeQoh; Califoraia, on the 1st day of Mach, by the following roll call vote : AYES! BAZI L I 1-A..REM-, KAU M N, CR.ABB , WORTHY, LAWSON NOES : MILT ER ABSENT : NOVE, ATTEST : �': R;.Fyro Q oBeR 750 Bail!- Secrezary Chairman RUTAN & TUrKER ATTORNEYS AT LAW A.W. RUTAN LCRor N. 01"It POST orrice E30X 10745 JAMCS r.TUCKCr, ILA. W. K. LINDSAY R08LRT J. STURNANI. Ions-isso MILFORD W. DAHL 771TZ R.STRADLINO 401 WEST EIGHTH STRECT NORMAri H. 5MCDEGAARD RICHARD A.CURNUTT H ROOGCR HOWCLL LEONARD A.HAMPCL SANTA ANAI CALIFORNIA 92702 J.AMCS O.TUCKCP JOHN O.HURLHUT. JR. WARREN SIKORA MICHACL W. IMMCLL March 7 1956 �� `�"µs`L GARVIN F. SHALLCNUCRGCR VCRLYN N. JENSEN , JOSEOi� R. HAf71IGN WILLIAM S. HARMOI ROBERT T. MAROLO JAMCS R, MOORC COLLrCH M. CLAIRL - AREA CODE 714 HERBCRT W.WALKCR MILFOnO W. DANL.JR. ALEXANDER 130WIE JOHN J. IIYLAN TELEPHONE 543-9411 ROBCNT L. THOMAS F. KOSTit $S}� K k� R TODD � 4I L CArLC AD77CSS ORLAW ROB[ T C.TOD THOMA9 P. ouRK[ �7rFss1 1J P�'� HOWARD .1 HARRISON ANDREW J. WMARCO JAMCS C. CRICKSON STCPHCN C.GRUMPY i JOHN M.VINC[NT JOHN G. O1UPARRA �- PETER V. SHACKTCR r_ ' HOMER L.MCCORMICKrJR. IN REPLY PLCASE REFER TO COMUND R.CASCY !G y WILLIAM R.uiEL �'-_...1 NICK C. YOCCA 3 �► L D �► s R The City Clerk- City City of Huntington_ Beach HU 1IN&ON BEACH City Hall Huntington Beach , California Re : Protest on Zone Case 66-11 Dear Sir : The undersigned, as attorneys for and on behalf of William Miles , - as property o�mer, and Doyle Development Co . , Inc . , as the subdivider, respectfully protests to the City Council the decision of the City Planning Commission on March 1 , 1966 denying the above numbered rezoning request . The action taken by the Planning Commission was improper in that, through great and excessive speculation as to the "where" and "when" of a proposed new Huntington Beach Freeway, and what effect should be given to the � Master Plan of the City of Huntington Beach, the subject property did not receive a full, fair and lawful hearing on the merits . { It is therefore respectfully requested that a hearing be held at the earliest possible moment to permit the City Council to hear evidence in support of the proponents ' request and to allow the City Council an opportunity to reconsider the Planning Commission decision and rezone the property as requested . It is our understanding that no fees are necessary on zone change hearings before the City Council . Should this be in error, please advise us -and we will forward to you the necessary sums . Respectfully yours RUTAN & TUCKER H . Rodger Howell HRH :mw AffiduavlPof Publication State of CmIftrrtla s -1a1� air;: County ot.,Qra:zge ss s , City of HutttfnRton Beach ���j ;ate Farquhar, being duly sworn on oat.'t, s • That he is a Sys. ,eecw aR.�era16M `-M 1A�dl�,. aitbzen of the United State3, over the age of twenty-ono yews. '.opt-ram►A apt_= ► That he is the printer and publisher of the Huntington Beach News, a weekly newspaper of gineral circulation printed, published an Z. d circulated in the said County of Orange turd elsewhere and ;' Vi�•ei: oublMed for the s.�emination of local and other news of a general di riet character, and has a bona fide aubscrlption li,t of paying subscribers, irieisd vlliik S."'t110W 1 and said paper has been established,.printed and pub,i=hed in the State of.California, and County of Orange, for at least one year next before the publication of the first insertion of this notice; and the ari` firs said newspaper is not devoted.to the interest of. or publLihed for the ss entertainment-of any particular claw, profession. trade, calling, race =dal¢ or denomination, or any number thereof. mom_ _ast ei� ayr,ltr The Huntington Beach News was adjudicated a legal newspaper d- s of genernl circulation by Judge G. K. Scovel in the Superior Court of Orange County, California August 27th, 1937 by order No. A-593L That the USE D151 RICE' HEARING, ZONE CASE NO. 66-12 of which the annexed is a printed copy. was published in said news- VIT � t paper at IerLst One Issue _ _ R .r °�' •s }`` x`ma - jam April commencing from the (' cl ey of 66 a ndG: ? h April and e g on the day of . =t � c e 169 � „ both days inclusive, and as often during said period and times of publication as said paper was regularly issued, and in the regular and entire issue of said newspaper proper, and not in a supplement.- and said notice was published therehi on the following dates, to-wit; -April 7. 1966 f' - elf- / Fublisher, �s t Subscribed and sworn to before me this du of :, AU a. i - "` �z'•`':�.r.;.�_ rC)_. �. cfL>��.e at'aruc milli' N ...., T Public , Andavi Orange County, CaliforniaMOW f S f ►` ;� UOTARY PUBLIC - U.1 I OR111A t i � #'1l+rws�f nor�1M"b '' PRtii P,,L OFFICE (2{ Uwl My Commission Exp3;e3 Scat. i3, 19&6 � , ' f. t ....s PPROVED DY G •Y COUNC11, , d. Boa 190 r Lie APR 181966 ih CityU01 APR 41966 ` ��► P ti -Hun ng n Beach, California �r�y,..� /P 10,00 o =NqA r. C'f. CITY c 'r 1 j+, 1;'66 i s L E T T E R O F T R A N S M I T T A L TO : HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL , CITY Or HUITINGTON BEACH. . ATTN-. DGI-I-E MILLER, CITY ADMINISTRATOR RE: RESOLUTION NO. 66-12 , a resolution of the City Planning Commission recommending approval of Zone Case 66-12 from R-A Residential Agricultural and R-A-O Residential Agricultural combined with Oil to R-1 Single Family Residence District. i Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith is a copy of Resolution No. 66-12, a resolution of the City Planning Commission recommending approval of Zone Case 66-12. This case proposes to change the zone on approximately 40 acres of land located on the south side of Indianapolis Avenue between Cannery Street and the Orange County Flood Control Channel and abutting the north side of Indianapolis .Avenue from Bushard Street to approximately 700 feet east of Cannery Street. The City Planning Commission held a public bearing on the matter March 19 , 1966, at which time there was no one present to speak for or against the matter. By unanimous vote of the City Planning Commission, Zone Case 66-12 was approved and recommended to your Honorable Body for adoption. The Code provides that a public hearing shall be held on the matter after which an ord-Inance may be adapted effecting the change . Respectfully . 1-omitted, i K. A. Reynold , Planning Director and Secretary K.A_R/rlb Encl : Resolution No. 66-12 I LESC%, MCU Zip„ 66--12 • w I SC:Gi:i MOON MIT 1H0011fR_JD4.T1QN 0 tITUE C.L',f'Y JF iMIfiING-*TURe BEACH , CAL1P01MI ., PX'C0�'-7L MTD1WU 0PROVAL 01F MINE C-93B 66 -12. I ` HTZIR£'AS , be City 1111sming Commission of the City of [luntiWbon Beach, C&'l f'orn{.a, ars held one public Baring I in e ithL the State Government Code In order to consider and review Zone Casa 66-12. and U-111,2EAS , Vae City Planning Commission, on t_.e bas-is of land use su_rve s Master Plata of Arterial Highways , Master Plan of Land Use , zoning and considerat,ion � given 5o Nhe general pul)lic , does find the following conditions to exist on the ICY-oper:,yp ouvlined for a change of zone from P-A Residential Agricultural and R-A--4 griculti ral combined with. Oil to R-1 Single Family Residence Dititric t; : 1 . The Master Plan of Land Use: designates the area for loser density developtasAta 2.. There ie an approved tentative map filed on subject property for si gle fe-milt' residences. NOW, iREFQR.E , BE 1T RESOLVED Section 1 : That the City Plmming Commission, as a result of atudy aad consideration, concludes tbat the real property located on the south side- of .1nd3.snaDolis Avenue between Cannery Street and r a: t—,^ Control l th a_ang� CC,' Flood Channe- , and aUutti.a the nor uh si.de of Indianapolis Avenue from Bu shard S troet to approximately- ?OC feet s r C Street 'as t o_ a�.e_r�T Meet and _2galIv described as . i Parcel iv c. 1 A parcel of land being a gart of the Sirs►of Section 7, 76S , PaGW, BB&M , described as : All that portion of the SWA of .said Section 7 Ding northerly of the south 50 acres of the north half of said southwest quarter of Section 7 , and westerly of the westerly line of the Orange County Flood Control District Right of Wag, as described in deed recorded December 27, 1961, in Book 5956, gage 185 , of Official. Records. Parcel No. 2 A parcel of sand being a part of the NWY* of Section ? , . T6S, R10W, SBB&M. City of Huntington Beach, County of orange , State of California, described- as : Aal that portion of the IVW')4 b.f said Section ? , .Lying southerly and westerly of the following described line : Beginning at a point on the westerly line of said Section 7, distaat thereon 2019- 52 feet southerly from the northwest corner said Section r; thence easterly parallel with the northerly line of said Section 7 to the westerly line of the Orange County Flood' Control Di.s- rict Right of Way as deseribedi in deed recorded December 2_? , 1901 , in Book- 5956 , page 185, of Official Records; thence southerly along said westerly line of said right of way to the southerly line of said NW)4- of Section 7. Excepting therefrom the westerly 10.00 acres thereof. Also exce tin therefrom the easterly 100'.00 F g y feet of the sourtherly 120.00 Feet thereof. Parcel No. - 3 A parcel. of land being a. part of the NIWA of Section 79 16S, RIOWs SBB&-", City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange , State of California, described as : . All that portion of the NVA of said Section 7, lying southerly and easterly of thefollowing r describediline : ' • •M 1 Beein ing ;. a poin't on the easterly !ine of a-►d I r of Sec-ion 7, distant thereon -2019. 52t :feet so-;thee v 1'!:i2m. �;,be northerly line of sal d Section t�tence 7 �- v.e:iterly par allel with said � r.Lrthei,ly -Nine of Section 7� to the eastex►.y 1.;ae of the Orange Count7y Flood CoII i r of Dis-brit Right of I-Way; as recorded Decem?:er 27 , i96-1 i.s- Book 591; , page .185, of Offic .-al Records ; thence southerij along said easterly line of said Right of Way to the southerly line of ssi d IN% -f 5fac W-on 7. Escepting therefrom the easterly, 260-00 reef- of the southerly 260.O0 feet .therefrom. is hereby recommended to be reclassified from -R-A Residential Agricultural and R-A-0 Residential Agric.0 tv-ra cambined with Oi_1 to R-1 Single Family hesis.ence District., . Sec-t�.on 2 : That the City Planning Commission recommends aaproval of Zone ( rise 66-12 to the yify Counncis . Section 3 : 'fine Secretary shall certify- and attest to' the a'�o�t� on. of this ��esoZution by the members of l the ' City Planning Commission. i REGUL RLY PASSED MID ADOPTED b�, the City Planning Commission II of tr City of Huntington Beach, California : on the 15th day of March., 1966 , by the -fol-.owing roll call vote : l AYES ; LAV,30H, CRAM, BAZTI_ , MATH-PzLIT , WORM', MILLER., LARKIN. NOES : IZONE ABSEN T : I-I OBE ATTEST: f Secretary Ohairr, an 3 -A#fidayO of Ablication 1J;S ' L Lgra7-nt-Californiaa County-of Orange 3a City of Huntington Bench J. S. Farquhar, being duly sworn on oath, mys: That he iA a j citizen of the United States, over the ash of twenty--one years. That he is the srin•.cr and publisher of the Huntington Beach News, a weekly nenvspapei -' general circulation printed, published and eirculatcd in the said Coves :af Ommga: and el.►ewhere and PuL•lished for the ftseminat►:'.t of local ,=� other ,yews of a general character, and. has a lmna Ede subscription list of wing subscrlbe:s, and said paper has been established, printed ZA pub'liz-had in the F;�,—"Im '�°s� State of California, and County of Orange, for at least one year fa=t Wore the publication of the first hwertion of this notice; and the said newspaper is not devoted to the Interest of, or published for the— entertairuneat of Any 1tQ�� t:•.4 a3x;,�l t 1f s otv than �,, particular claw, profession, trade, calling, race � �;fit �-fib► or denotnination, or any number-thereof. rt a The Huntington Beach News was adjudicated a legal newspaper ��t`-�� t-;rhr�nt�s`of a�:C�vtc csta: a<t. of general circulation by Judge G. ��. Srcovel in the Superior Court. oc;+` of orange County, California August 27th, i st oy �' Ar No. A-5331., # O"-C.? tho - �:.nTICE OF USE DISTRICT HEARING That the ZONE {.;DOE NO, 616-11 "r`ts c fo- s` Ftoi r�i txs of which the annexed Is a printed copy, was published in said newe- gaper at leas_} One Issue commencing from the _23rd elnyof June ~ . illna 19 :L „ and ending an the }r� c,day of IS____.__, Dotal da_ inclurdve, and as of ten during 1al3 period and times of pubIica-tion ace acid parer was regularly_issued, and-in the regular and entire' issua of said re"unper proper, and not Ina supplement, and said notico war. published therein on-the-following dates, to-wit: June 21, 1966 � ego 6 l Publisher t T Subscribed and sworn to before me this z O � day of � 'tot:ary Public Orange Couw -, Califorwaa I THOMAS D. WYLL1E 110TAW PUBLIC - CALIMPNIA PRINCIPAL GfFICE IN URANGE COUNTY My *.r4s„i;i1s5lon Expires Sept. 13, 19616 !z! Cie Z., JVK_2 0 -° c�lrn�oli si�On r �lnlnto��. � allnl�l ; P. O. Box: i APPROVED CITY COUNCIL ;' Qty' ball Huntington Beach, California 1 June 202 1966 CITY CLL]K]C L E T T E R OF T RAN S M I T T A L TO : HONORABLE ,MAYOR AND L`CITY- COUNCIL, City of Huntington Beach . A.TTN: DOYLE MILLER'. City Administrator. RE . RESOLUTION-.-NOG 66-13, - a resolution of the City =fanning Commission recommending appro_"I of Zone Case -No . 6E-13 from A-1-X General-`:Agricultural:District to, R-5 Off ice- Prof essiona!,a District: Genclemen : Transmitted herewith -is a copy. of Resolut-ion No. 66-13, a resolution of -'-the City. Planning Commission recommending ap- proval*' of Zone Case' No`. 66-13 This case proposes to' change the . zone on 0.27 + acres of land located at the southt%vest corner of Warner Avenue and Ash Street from A-1-X Genera1t. Agri cri.ti ral District 'to R-5 Office- Profes-sional-District,. The City Planning CoaRnission held a public hearing on the matter June 7 , 1966° at which -time one person spoke in favor of the request. Zone Case No 66-13 was approved and recommended to your Honor- able Body for. adoption 'by the . following roll call vote of the City Planning, Comm ssion AYES : Bazil, Crabb'- ' Miller, Worthy, Larkin. NOES: None . ABSENT : Lawson,. The Code provides: that a public . hearing shall be held on the matter after -wh c h air ordinance may. he adopted effecting the change . Respectfullyp hmitted, f K. A. Reynolds , planning Director and Secretary hAR/.bd Encl Resolution No 66=13 r RESOLUTION aIO NO. i 6-13 RESOLUTION OF RE-COMMENDATION A RESOLi 10H OF TM CI17 P_ LA NG COMMISSION OF sue-..CITY OF 111-11 TT.NOMN ASEACH CALIFORNLIA R.ECORAMING APPROL�.. OF ZONE USE VIO 66-15� WHEREAS The City. Plam ng Comission. of the City of 'I � d b I nzirt I�t�.x:g..� �s�ch, Ca.�3f©�n�!, �s het. one � Z � g Ln compliance sAth the State Goverommt Coda Un order to Conai r ad review a Cam No.- 66-13, and REAS, �i City Flana� g Coamission, en the basis of IaVA ease surmysli Master P'smm of Art*rlal Highways, Heater Plan of tand Ulm t, existing zming, and considers- tion given to tthe na rat .public, does find the i ollaw1mg conditions to exist on the property outtAmd for a change of zone from A l-.w.X Gemral Agrimiltural, District to F-mS F- Off ice-Profeasional District: - 1. This ragueat is In confommce with the Master Ply li of ' Land [use. . NOW, THERWOEUa BE IT RESOiVED Section 1. That the City P=arcing Commission, as ra result of study- and consL:Aafirgci.on, concludes that the real property located at the southwest coamr of Warn*r .4vextufta and Aab Street and 10 gs117 described as i Lots 2 and jog Block B. Tract No. 3680 I i i f i Rassniixtion No . 66w13 is hereby recc tided to bo reclassified f 1row ApI.-K General Agricultural DletrLct to R-f5 CfficamProfeseioeal Di.atri ct. I Section 2. That the City Planning C xmission recomends aprrmal of Zone Case No. 66,43 to the City � council. I I Section 5s The , Sacretary aball certify and attest to the adoption of this resolution by tba memhert of the City pLa=ing comissione REGULARLY PASSED Arm Ja�:'TED, by the City Planning Comitsica of the City of HuntImStcm Reacb, Califorrd~ae, on tine 7 tb der of June, 1966 s by the f of lowing roll call Vat**. AYES: UAL,,- 4.:abb, filler; Worthy, Larkins NOES: mmm ABSENT: Laviono ATMSTI ; v mrWIft Robert Saz etas Chai asa i l TO : HIMMARL MAYOR AND` CIV Cfl IL$ City of witington Uoacar6 ATTH MYLS MILLER- C1ty Admlmistratere RE: RESOL ION M, 66,•13 Temolutllon of the City Plaming C6aaxvlan rawommend approval- of zags .Casa goo 66.-11 fry A-1-ftX gal A c$ t ural -District to Rs5 Offiae- Prar�en1tct Tra= .tted emrauatb la a- moony of Regolutfo n No. 66439 a € '.ZiGn cj: tam c1ty. P3 3 g C 96$ 3g @i�m promp'L. of zma case* ,a. 6690139 Tii,f• cog* pmpaomsta ahmga tba mm an 0-027 t scares of 'll � tar. atjA at the outht4gt: emar of Warner Amu and .Ash SCmet f r��m��!!/ffiffi/yyawlmX bra Agrimltural. Dietriet to R..S Office.-Pr fGa- Me City P1=1na CC=i-zmi 00 IVild a Pubue tearing on xha Metter ime 76 19660 -it ,.t ccb time am r_po rsan spoka is fawr of the Zone Case :6. 66,m13 &us apprcmmd &nd. cocoamaded to yattr omarm. able Po for adoption by the- following ,rall eAl vote of the city P fig COWia e340 AYES: UaxJ16 Cw * Millar! Worthy, Larkin, NOwS: Name A6SERI z Lawsom- Tim prise that a public Imu g sball-be v d an the matter after fetich an- ordiumace my be adopted of le ctittg t:a Change. Rac;rnctiully submittedr K, A. PAlds W. ins Di=ct r and 6$cmtary Eval s Resubitim Noe 6643 RESOLUTION NO. 66-13 RESOLUTION-.OF '-CMIHENDATION- A RESOLUrloW OF THE CITY 11ANNING COMMISSION UE THE CITY Oar HHgTlirlG' 0�3 BEACH CALIFORNIA . RECONMEMINC APPROVAL": OF' ZONE ELE NO 66ft.15 AREAS, The City P1annfng Co=dseion of the City of Hsnatington Beach, Cai li€ornia, has bald one public tearing in oompliance vitb the State Government Cods in order to amaider mid review 24m* Case No. 66-131, and WHEREAS, The City P1amnUg Commissiou, an tho baste of law use "rvoys, Master Plan of Artzrial Highways, Master Plan of Land, Use, existing uming, and considers- tion SEven to tble gsna ml public, does find the fallowWg conditime to +axiat an the property outlied for a change of zone fry A�1�A Cmneral Agricultural District to R-5 Cf f ice-�'rofad��.00�ax I�3.otrict; 1. Tbis r�sac��at - is In c orms witb the Master Plan Of Limit Use a j NCW9 THEREFORE S BE IT RESOLVED Section 1. T at the City Planning Commission, as a result of study and consideratim, concludes that the reel property located at the southwest corner of harmer Ave mu and Ash Sts.at Bind Legally described sn: Lots 2 and 40 $lock. B, Trac t No. 368. solution No. 66,43 • is hemby r#c — 3 to be &*classified from Am-Z•%K Gewral Agricultural` District to R-5 Dffiae.'Prof"ai+ l District-, Section 2. Tbat- tbo City Flawlaag Commission VOCOMMUdio i oppraw l. of-Zone 2 Case No. 6643 to the City Seetim 3h Secretary.-shall certify aW attost to the , adoption of this resolution by the newborn of tbe- City . PlemIng Cooed sla.. MGMiRLY ASSEn Ate ADOPTTED6 by the City PlamIng Coiniosim of `-th*- City of Runtington Brach, CalifoxiiL#, an the 7tb --oaf 3uuoe 1966 the following roll call vote Al'LS: BrAZL ., ebbs Miller, Woxthy, Lase. ES o Nerave A$SE :' Laasone AT MST: i • • 1"t • e�2 �� Choi== M A lta of #*- blicati6n . State of California County af:CWnnSe , as nti City of Hungton-Beach J. S. Farquhar, being duly sworn on oath- says: .That be is a citizen-of the..United.Statan'7over.-the,age of twenty-one`years. � That he is the printer:.and.publisher:of;the,Huntington'.Beach Dews, a weekly newspaper 'of:general cireulatianf!printed,,publisheu and circulated in the said County_ of .grange{sand ,elsewhere-',:and.,... published for:the dissemination of;local'arid other nevus of a_general; character, and bas a bona fide subscription,listof g aubacrlbera, and said paper has been:established,=Fzititedanc3? li.ftiedyin the / State of California; and C6 nty.of Orange, for at kest,ono year:next, I before the.pubUcation-of'the.first aneertion of.this'.'notice; aria the.. said newspaper Is not;devoted-to^the int�reat-of. or-publlshed:for,the entertainment ofiany.,particular.class, profession,:.tisde,:calling, race . or denomination,'or,any:number thereof:K' _ The'Huntington-Beach,News was adjudicated a_legal newspaper.- of general circu,ation by Judge G: K Seovel-1n.the Superior:Court: c, of Orange County, California August 27th;=1437 by order:No A=593L That the NOTICE OF _USEi_DISTRICTI.REARING �:H► Cst+�e�z - Z WIT E CASE :- NO. 664"14 • of which the annexed is-a< printed co P Py� was, published !n said news- paper at least Olt e Issue s.r�ss commencing from the 23rd day of June 19 b 6 and ending on the 23rd day of June s+ h'slue °f'ii�"t!i►� 19 O'_tJ both days inclusive, and as often during said period and F ±" tinies of p 'p pe was_regularly_:'iss and in_the= ublication as said a r_ ued, - regular=,arid entire issue of said`newspaper -proper. and not°-.in;a l supplement,'and-said'-notice was published thereUi on-the following' t _ ' dates, to-wit: June 23s 1966 6 IdW L0,- 4, ' Publisher Subscribed and sworn. to before me this x� dal,• of .—, 1966 Notary Public Orange County, California THOMAS D WYLLIC NOTARY PUBLIC;• CALIFORNIA + PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN oi;Anc CGUIM My Commission Expires 3epi. 13, 1966 "� %war r JUN �& _ La Huntin tow ac an rnmi lion �-. P. O. BOX 190 APp$OVEIy B CIA T�pr CityHall tj�f YCI-1 Y COTJNejL Hunt ngton Beach, California ` 6 1966 June 20 , 1966 CITY LETTER QF TRA= NSMITTAL TO : HONORALBLE MAYOR AND CITY, COUNCIL, City of Huntington Beach. ATTN: D0YLE='-MILLER;-':'City Administrator RE: RESOLIJT1014 N019 66'14, a resolution of. the City Planningg Commis$ion recommending " approval 'o£ Zone Case No. 66-14 from A-1-X General Agricultural Distract to',R-5 -Office Professional =Distriet Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith- is a copy of Resolution No. 66-14, a resolution of the City- Planririg Commission` recommending ap- proval of Zone- Case- No'. 66-=14- This case proposes to changge; the zone on 0.56 ± acres of land 1ocated ':100 feet -west) of the_- southwest corner :-of Warner Avenue and Ash :Street from A=1-X General Agrcultura_1�:<District tole. R-5 Off Icei-Professional`,--Dig trict' ` The City Plannin$g Commission .held -a public hearing or the matter June. 7 , 1966 at- 'wb i6b-,-'time one- person:.spoke.. in . favor of the request'. Zone Case No. 66-14 was approved and recommended to your Honor- able Body for ado tton b the f ollowin roll - call vote 'of the � P y g . City Planning- Commssibn : AYES: Bazil', Crabb, Miller,. Worthy, Larkin. NOES :. None ABSENT: -- Lawson. The Code provides that a public hearing shall be held on the matter-after which an ,ordinance,- may be adopted effecting the change Respectfully s mitted , K. A. Reynolds, planning -Director- and Secretary KAR/bd -Encl : Resolution- NO. 66-14 RESOLUTION NO, 66-14 RES01MION OF RECOMMENDATION, A RESOLUTION'OF THE CITY PLANNING COAVaISSION OF THE1 CITY ' OP HIR4.rINGTO BENCH, CALIFORNIA, RECOMME- LADING ' APPROVAL-07 ZONE-CASE NO . 66-1 4 W0REAS, The 041ty Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, California, has held one public' hearing in compliance --with the State Government Code in order to consider and review Zone Case No. 66-14, and WHEREAS, The City Planning Commission, on the basis of land use surveys, Master Plan of Arterial Higbivays, Master Plan of Land Use,, existing zoning and considera- tion given to the general public, doea find the following conditions to exist on the pry-gerty outlined for a change of zone frog A�-I-X -General Agricultural District to R-5 - Of r ice-Professional District 1. '1' ds request is in conformance wlth the teas ter Plan of Land Use NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED Section 1. That the City Punning Commission, as a result of study and consideration, concludes that the real property located 100 feet- cyst of the southwest corner of Warner Avenue and Ash Street and legally- deacribed as : Lots 61 8 and 10, Block B of Tract 36$5 RE SO IXTr I ON NO. 66-"4 to hereby recommended- to be reclassified from A.-iAIX General Agricultural District to Rd5 Office-Professional District. Section 2. That the City Planning Commission recommends 1 approval of Zone Case No. 66-14 to the City pP , Council. 'I Section 3. Tt-: Secretary shah. certify and attest to the adoption of this resolution by the members of the City Plarmi,ng Commission. REGLUARLY PASSED AMD A-.jOPTEDa by the City Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, California, on the 7th day of June 1966, by the following roll call vote : APES: Baehr Grabb, Miller, Worthy, Larkin, NOES Ncm.e. { ABSENT: Lawson. ATTEST; i K. A. Reitnd S - rt D. Bazil f secretary Chairman i 6 A Jum 20p 1966 T03 MNORh= MAYOR AND CIV t'OMUj City of ItmClogtoo Beach. ATTIq i 3DOW KU.SR#'- City,AftintAt ator t RMUM NO. ' 6644 a to **1%*laa of the City Frio District to R•S Offt+c�.. Tranwitted bmwitb In Impy of Usolution No. 66Qi44 a =801. Utiott of tbm Cit . .P ia$ commus rsoammear-W ap" pmvoi of , 66-al.40 This 'case Paio�po to. abau t� cm ov,56 f ae� of Iarki imai*d too f F;ast 6f a soutbwast cover of Warner Ada and - Asb St z"t-: mm A•IdwX 0minvat-AVIcul ouical Dintriat to R4 nffICSwP iafemsi0"j nistrfct. Tin C9it �'Sa�raI n Cowdos� hold a public baarin on the �ttcr•_ u�t ' ai tdil t o � o S;:L is favor of tba x s . Case 664 :: cur sppa�id and rsPip-a sd to year ate- ab1e Body fote, tbs l�alhs� zo�,3 rill vote tba� - iZ MS I lkmils, Carabbs Millers Wafthys La%ti o,. NOES% ANSI; Lao . The Co" d" thot * public bea g sbe21 be bold an the cotter. after an dxdnce msy be &AMted effoctift the chanSP& Respectfully w itted i K. A. Aids, P?ArmU g Di mctcr md. SacrftaW YAR/bd l Encl i Reso1ut im No* 66•44 4 PC* SOLUTION OF F-4 COINVENDA-TIL .A F;ESO IM110y. 01� TI!T.: Ci'ly pl . LTDI, r �.C+=� OF TIM CITY OXF HLINTENGTON BEACH & Y 7 F"J t'M 1.A. ; REC[tMENDING AFFROVAL : Cr ZONE C S L` N-0 . --i MMEAS= T e Cj t:Y PI-anning Commis .an of- thn- Gity of 141ntirgton Beach, cap•Lfornia, ��sa ��e�.cl on�� publ 'rearing _ In compliance With the State Grvc- ntr._.n i,'vde in order to ccnsidor Mid review ?ene ca0e No* 66- 141 and : R ,a_5; T'se Clay Piunr -L Co an the basis Of Land r.se su%0 'QYS y Ma6 per Pfau of Arta ri.L;_. lk*L5ter 'Flan Of Lend Uga; ex sting ing tion given to the gancral P blic, does 4: .11.1 the �o11.or�.r cc�nz� 0n3 t e%ist on ti,z property astli..t0d �cr g a cjtan e y � of gone irow aw3.-K Gsn3rt41 Ayrlc�zitural, �a.s;:�: .ct to T-5 Off ice-ProfeSsiona3 1.. This request =9 in c lonf or-mance wit b nje uj to pla-d- Of Land Use. NONT L THEMEFORE,, BE IT RESOLVED Saction 1.,. That the City Planning Co.1r►issio. �n result Of study and cans idcza 4 ;.on co:c i��cea that the rest, proper r ioca tee no � .: . 3t O-E t1l sL3i,2i2' vT est COrnO of :3rner Alr nilra c� A910 Street and legally desce. Lots 65 8 end 10� Rock 1 oi I . - RESOLMIGN rya. 66-14- is bereby recommended. to be. recle9i siff ed from A.-I-x' Genera3. Agricultural Distriet to R.-S Office.-Professional District. Section 2. That the City Planning Commission recommend$ approvnI of`-Z Case No. 66-14 to the City Counc�.�, Section 3, The Secretary..shall certify and attest to tha adopt on , of this resolution by the wwbers Of -the Zity Pla, wing Commission. REGULARLY- PASSED .:AHD11 ADOPTED' by the City Planning Cowission--of . the C*ty-of Huntington Beaches California, on the tb,-d 7 sat of June 1966, by b, the following roll call i vote: AYES: Bazil, Grabb,- Miller, Worthy, Larki , NOES: None, ABSENT: - Lawsan.. ATTMST: 5 A.. Reyml aRobert D. Bazil. i , ecreaxy Cbgfn 6 4