Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Zone Change Cases - 1970-1971 - ZC 70-4, C. Michael, Inc - Z
Pt EX0 TO: Planning C:os,vn�.J,ior, FROM: Richard A . Harlow DATE: August 4 , '19'/? RE: Zone Case No. 70- 4 Applicant : C. Michael , inc . The above referenced zone �.ase pertains to property locaccd between Slater Ave . and Speer Ave . , 282 ft . west of Beach Blvd . on 15 . 35 acres of land . the zone change was filed by the appli- cant on January 20, 1970, and requested a rezoning from K2 Two Family Residence District to R5 Office- Prof2s.sir!�,al t� .scri.ct . The R5 zone was requested to permit a mobs lehome park . The applicant also filed Conditional Exception No , 7D-. 7 in 'cun3unction with the zone charge to permit construction of the mobilehome park . AG the April 21. , 1970, ,neeting the Planning Commnission approved Conditional Exception No . 70- 7 upon the fol,;owing conditions : 1 . The applicant shall comply with the ME - Mobilehome Park Ordinance when it is adopted subject to review and appro- val by the Planning Commission . 2 . Conditional Exception No . 70- 7 shall not be effective until adoption of the MH - Mobilehome Perk Zone or until criteria for mobil.ehome parks is adopted . Action on 'Lone Case No . 70- 4 was continued to allow time for an MH Zone to be prepared . The Commission, at the ,July 7 , 1970 , meeting, approved the MH zone and recommended approval by the City Council . This matter will be heard by the City Council at their August 3 , 1970, meeting . If the (1ity Council approves the MH Mobilehome Zone, the Planning Commission may take action en Zone Case No . 70-4 at the August 4, 1970 , meeting. In,' view of the above information, the staff recommends appro- val of zone Case No. 70-4 for an MH - Mobilehome Zone -ather than the R5 zone as requested . If however, the City Council does not take action on the MH Zone on the August Ord meeting, the staff recommends continuance of Zone Case No . 70-4 until the City Council app►oves an MH - Mobilehome Zone . Pub l ish`..8/11U71 L .....r a,NG S c Postcards III P . FOR'•"""' Q ��� NOTICE of PUBLIC BEARING Z NOTICE IS HE EEBY GIVEN that a nublic hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council. Chamber or the Civic Center , Huntington reach, at the hour of 1- 30 P. I. , or .is soon thereafter as possible , on Tuesdav ,� the 8th day of _Mot ig r _ , 19_0 , for the purpose of considering ti petition for a chan3e of zone from A2 Two Family Hesi.de,.nce District to R5 office-Professional District. Located between Slater and Speez#3 Avenues, 282 feet west of Beach B.aulevard . A legal description In on file in the Pl& ning Depwrtmant office . All interested persons are invi.tei. to attend said hearing and express their opinions far or against said &an jgq_ Further information lasy . 'aye obtained from the Office of the City Clerk. DATED: Amijustd 20, 1 ) ._ �i C1T'Y ':�F• HVIIr1C`i'ON �AiCN By:: PauY C . Jones City Clark K.T I 40011 Fh R CHANGE O'c ZONE , FILING FEE 015022 tRECEiv�Kf-) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ' ll P. O. Box '90 DATE FIL . ,_.�.. ... /'!.� rE AcrOA& w COMMISSION ACTION DATE_... ,•t._....�....�......_._. � PROPERTY OWNER Q,APPROVED [] CONMTC%. ALLY APPFtNED 6u..fs , Xvc C) DENIED AUTHORIZED ANENT Q WITHDRAWN �ir f7 il4/,.�a!% �sc. _ _ :e APPEALED Q Q ,V YES O •iMA1LIN(3 ADDRESS _ � �. w COUNCIL ACTION DATE _oy�o." Q SUSTAINED COMMISS?ON PHONE NO. Q APPROVED WITH CONOITIONS OTHER THAN COMMIS MOPS z Q DENED PETITIONED PROPERTY TO DE REZONED WITHDRAWN FROM °�___� ..._,____ EFFECTIVE DATE ORDINANCE NO. r LOCATION OF PROPERTY ( SIDE OF STREET , STREET NAME , DISTANCE FROM NEAREST :NTERSECTING STREET) , eMACAW fCirgw A*tr ,rfE�./�s� !�: 'dfo jfevr v,oc vv LE"L DESCRIPTION ( SEPARATE LEGAL REQUIRED FOR EACH ZONE REQUESVED ) Lo se r FA a *y— ar/,ed • t,r tErr;Ali 1 INDICATE WHAT ?LANE YOU HAVE FOR IMMEDIATE DEVELOPMENT OR GIVE REASONS FOR � REGMSTING THIS ZONE CHANGE. N� '' JJ A 00 1# /r,r,w Fri/TC' �+►O�i�E Mr•��' !�Rt.r OIC�QL•o✓�pf/l- li • SIGNATURE MdMOPERTY OWNER 01 UTHORIZED f THE ATTACHED SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET MUST BE REAM AND SIGNED BY TyIE APPLICANT " fT. Ars-fida-vit of PybUcation* 46 State al Callforaia O�ounoY Ntty anxtoof r Beach J. S. >lrarquhar, being duly sworn on oath, says: That he is N citizen of the United States, over the age of twenty-one ym-s. Mat he Is the printer and publisher of the Huntington Beach News, k weekly newspaper of general circulation printed and pub. linhM In 'Huntington: Beach, California and circulated In the said County of Orange and elsewhere and pAllshed for the dissemination p of local and other newt of a general character, and has a bona fide > subscription Hit of paying subscribers, and said paper has been "TICK P ;,k, established, printed and published in the State nr California, and 'Na 1"u1j"o o�wac'I County c! O range, for at least ore year next beb,re the publication , 1% " of the first insertion of this noti-x; and the salt newspaper it not ,09" r, M=' , at devoted to the interest of, or pub.ished for the enurtatnrnent of any ;'hX P•M.0 or 11aw�N0 particular class, profession, trade, calling, race e:- denomination, or » , any number thereof. a chm" W.. IV The Huntington Beach News was adjudlesited a iegut newspaper izs'dsnu�tlgsMW� of general circulation by Judge O. H. Scovel in the Superior Court +�t aowlksest M ianlaa�l i of Orange County, California August 27th, 1937 by order No. A-5931. ,and a sou t Is f on film M Va That the _ HgTrCE OF P MLIC HEARING All Inem" V1,.60V ese dwell r awed � .!ea- ewer Ewa. opinkma • ►ew� � 'i ZQNE Ci BF 0-3 t ►urthw'"n%rnmm mw be sUl mw from the onles of Wo V,!ty RNrtt of which VNe annexed is a printed copy, was published In said news- DArEDi 2/11/9• CITY (W Nl1NTING1`0114 t#L40H paper at least �� Yeeue G�G011 ' commencing from the 12th day of February 19-7-0_, and ending on the 1.2th day o! February 197C) both days inclusive, and as cilten during odd period an `L :� •, times of publication as said paper was regularly issued, and In tb* 1, ' regular and entire Issue of vald newspaper proper, and not In/a �':•�: supplement, and sold notice was published therein on the following �'ra dates, to-wit: ` February 12 1470 ..�.� In all ~ l Ftl�jllsiter Subscribed and sworn before me this .-1ZL'L_�_�__ defy of t 19..�.. Notary Public Orange Cxwrt,y, t ialtornia THOMAS 0. WYLUE PMIIIOI"L OFF;."S IN ORMW cVNn.. W My QWWW O hpk Sept. 12, 19?6 I Huntington Beach Planning Commission P.G. Box 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 Marcel 2 , 1970 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: Planning Commission SUBJECT: Zone Case No . 70-3 ATTN: Doyle Miller, City Administrator Paul Jones , City Clerk Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith is the Planning Commission recommenda- tion for approval of Zone Case No. 70-3 . Applicant : Shapell Industries , Inc . 8857 W. Olympic Blvd . Beverly Hills , Calif . Location : Southeast corner of Bushard St . and Adams Ave . Master Planned; Lott Density . Request : Change of Zone from RA Residential Agricultural District to R1 Single Family ResiJence District . Reason given by the a22licant : (In Brief) The trAct is now under construction for R1 development . Staff Recommendation: Approval . Commission Action: Approved. Reaso�.s given by the Plannin Commission for e r action: 1 . A condition of approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 6807 required the applicant to sub- r;it a zone change application to rezone this property to R1 . ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Bazil , Bokor, Slates , Miller, Tom, porter , Duke NOES : None ABSENT: None Additional information: There was no one to speak against or in ravoF of said request . Respectfully submitted, 11 . 4 . K. A. Rs"yno"s Secretary ZC ..., 70,w 3 .�. UJ li n r c N-,-L { I C 4 f �- tn Nwr___ - 1 DR. - - a -- - FROTI R A TOR 1 1410 7,r , Lo ` 1 70 3 . YELL OWSmNE + --- - -� 5 E Y R = . i OR 1._ Rl /rJ C( LL ,Rf5_ TIAlip q w L If 0 • '• I Ic 7771 I Zone Case No 70-3 Applicant -- Shapsll Inductrite , Inc. Staff Report i Date : February 3. 1970 The Staff have reviewed Zone Cnee No 70-3 and offers the following information for your considerations 1. Tha property is esituated on the southeast corner of Adams Avenue and Bushard Street. 8uah property oonsiste of 113*25 sores of land that is master planned for low density development. 2 . The Pla-,ining Commission approved antative Trrot Map No 6807, permitting this property to be developed as a +single family development. One of the conditions of approval of Tentative Tract Nap No, 6807 requires the applicant to submit a zone Orange to rezone this property R--lc In view of this the staff recommenda approval of Zone Case No 70-3 6 �I l EMOVit of lication State of Callfornla County H of Orange City Beach J. S. Farquhar. being duly sworn op. oath, says: That M Is a citizen of the United States, over the age of twenty-one years. That he Is the printer and publisher of the Huntington Beach News, a weekly newspaper of general circulation printed and pub- lished It's Huntington Beach. California and c!rculated In the said County of Orange and elwxtere and published for the dissemination of vocal and other news of a general character, and has a bona fide subscriptl©n slat of paying subacribera, and said paper has been established, printed and published In the State of California, and County of Orange, for at leant one year next before the publication of the first Insertion of this notice; and the bald r.rwspaper Is not devoted to VA interest of, or pubUshed for the entertainment of any parelcular class, profession, trade, calling, race or deaominatlon, or any number thereof, The Huntington Beach News wca adjudicated a legal newspaper �,,♦� of general circulation by Judge G. K, Scovel in the Superior Court of orange County, Caiifonia August 27th, 1937 by order No. A-5931. That the ..CST07 CF MIT-L.TC 'JvA 'T r, Z Cat r CASE :-TO- 70— 2 of which the annexed Is ■ primed copy, was published In Bald news- I i raper at least 0'»E' 2 a Fit!f" �g rommencing from the 22n6Tday of Jn 11itFtl y 70 2 2 n 0 J» ride ry Old]9 _, and ending on the day of 7 o sad r � 14—._.., both days Inclusive, and as often during said period andlog times of publication as said paper was regularlya1s issued, and In the _'F� i regular and entire Issue of saki newspaper proper, and not In t. supplrnment, and said notice was published therein on the followinK ~CtTtl { it�l'� A dates, to-wit: �! F C"0.,�p S MS MIA Ja n tiro rN, 22, 1970 _ �.:.� /I "e, Publlsher Subscribed and sworn to before me this ''�`�AW — day of 1fil.�cG2. ' Notary Public (, Orange County, California TiloMAS D. WyLLlE NaTA N MKIC - QMIF01!'NIA FAINCIPM. OFFIOE IN ORM16I? C011lI111 "''� Iirly =ssietr Expless ,Sept. 126 1970 -- Huntington Beach Planning Commission ..........w.. P.O. Box Ito CALIFORNIA 12646 February 2 , '1970 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL 1� �� Got3 0 FROM: Planning Commission - -- Ci ' - SUBJECT: Zone Case No. 70-2 - ( RESAUTION—OF-1 �'' ATTN: Doyle Miller, City Administrator i►T Paul Jones , City Clerk " t, Gentlemen : •' `'' Transmitted herewith is the Plannin Commission ation for approval of Zone Case No . 70- 2 , which was ini.ti by the Planning Commission. Location: Northwest corner of Warner Ave . and Got;tard St . Master Planned : High Density Residential Planning Commission ' s Initiation: Change of Zone rom R3 LLmItedt p e Family Residence District to C4. Highway Coaanercial District . Reasons given by the Planning Commission for their action: 1 . The property is presently zoned R3 and is occupied by the Weber' s Bread Co. It was noted this prcperty should be rezoned to a zone consistent with the land use . ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES : Bazil , Bokor, Slates, Tom, Duke , Miller, Porter NOES : None ABSENT: None THE MOTION CARRIED$ Additional information: Mr. Ed Gutzmann, representing Pacific Drive- In Theatre, as Fe a questi,oii on light intrusion from surrounding de- velopment.. John W. Swint , agent for Weber' s Company, spoke in favor. Respectfully sibmitted, K. A. Reynolds Secretary, Planning Commission 'Ei •ubilsitod Hunfinstrr, Poch N#ww Apr. 0.�7✓��'f,:'l,fr� Jt�GC�•'t'rW!' f NOTICE CF PUMIC MARINI 1Ef'!'d.+4t. VO t1,tMIAL t#Y PLANNING COMMIMPONI IONS CAIX 70.24N AND .H! NOTICE IC MERERY t3tYt',.A' thst 4 puo. ;. � .1"t•- tic• hearing will be hold l:v the City council Of Crio laty Of fiuntln4%on Reach, ter' �.`•: In 0'.t Cauncli µhambor of %he Civic r- ,.,t ,,,r.• ! r • •! t Center. Huntington Beach; 4t ttif now of 1130 P,M.. or as swra thtr.o'ter #$ —slble, on Wtwdsf tho 3rd dsy v, 7!:y, 1271, fat the putposs of consid4rirttl an ippeei W. Um d4rilet bw the City Olen- nine Cemmisslats al Itns Cgs* 71174 and COOditlbnftt GCCQtrt►,l 70•52, as fcilowct 11 Zomi Gabs No, 70-M - frorf, MI Ukht Imurtrlal ililtrict to MH moblifttcme Ris- wict. 21 Conditional trct►atian No. f0.32 - to { pamit the conttititflar. of a '37 &pact 1 rniblfaltoms ptrh oat ,7'i act* Caro ki at :and in tie MI 1.10, Industrial District. Us su►-joal proper'! Is located on 'Aq south side ut Slttar Avemey, sporox• ,-nwolf M4 1100 salt of Gothe•d street. A Iellst Goo-Iriptlon 1& an flte In tht alanninit Depirlm6rit office. All Inhrke+,A pusais wo Invitrd io &thrill sa►/, hsarimfl and is>:est their op►,vlons for or OSelMO Bald Zone craw and Conditional Byc,eption. further informatlon may be r7atelned frttM tht Offlca of the City Clwk. VATIM 411 7. CITY OF HU14TINQTOH REACH Myt Foul C. Jones City Qw% T Affidavit c�,%4 P&.Ikation 9tztta�P t�tllh�rtl� •~� �%,� � ' Ctscinty at On-inga its (`.lti' )!Funtl:lglnn VQrtel, 1 George Fttr•lithar, being duly nwoml on oath, :cnya: That he is n oitlzc,i of Iho tinitc<I atatea, rri'c r the ngo cif twelity-0610 ycnrIt, Thn! he is the printer tin+! publisher of the Nuntinrion Benct Nov,,?, a weolcly ncnt'spnrwr of };enerr_l ctr Oatlon printed tin i pub t lishc•ci In llunthr-tI'll 11e.tch, Cnllfot71111, anti circulated In the Ka Cotrnt� of Orattt;r and else there wid pullh0ved for tilt, dlss m(rnti t t of loretl and nth,,r t1ows of a ire ncrni chnr;ict,er, anti has a Uotift fl i sul+scrlpIloft list of p.151111; s0hscrlbc-ri, rind sold 1+.,per hn!, btvn r,t:iwisiltYi i,:itttea :znd puhlis`t^tt in the State r,' -',111fornin, and I C,rtnty of Orativc, for at Iettst one yvz►r neat lx�f..— tile publication VIONleM•d HuMIAOM NOON ftrs µpi. of the tip:., nsortlon c.f ihi:: notirc: and the Fald newspaper iu not aa, 1f11 ticvotctl to iN, of, ur putillsht-tl for the entertainment of any III111I;►Ck of Py" kttAtrtt pnrtirulnr professior!, trade, calling;, race or drttornination, or APM" Ys "AM stn�+ numher thertwf. KAIIMt?IM ttMlMll 'riw HLtitington De-ch Nows wni atijudicatvd r legal ncws,--Ajcr � C,�� {'k AN of l;enct al cl ctdnthiri by Judi;c G. K Scovel In the Superior CAiurl l WE a NIlaltt!Y wV" VA4 A of Oranc;e Cxtnty, Cnlifnrt-la Lg;ust 2701, 1937 by order No, A-5931., {MC• ttWiq, Mritl bo b,of QVItcll M 1hr fu•r of 'cunt ti:a ll�'HAL%± _ l'�?UIst� :.:�QL� ._�uq`�ri�2_ S� C«ti:� M 11i"a.�v�"t ►, a fto owl W T;aO ►.M,. r, as ttitOtll 110 n ., µtwsllrlt, rant Ik v�y " Aber c1't:5c..___ l��t, «or trs p�wvo+o r o tr �r r tNl 10 W" �tr10Ml tJP tlw of whl,,h the an--t':wJ is a printed ropy, Nvas publlahcx�i In said news•• ,h,� comwly w of 2WV qN@ me ad c:0nOlN6" rxtttIN11- f 18*7" 11 Zone wws W. TattO- t'rwe Mat paper at least onolt4011f'_ Lvjuswlad L7totMlot be MH M1�paMIN� Ififa• -- t 131 Ctttttdtltiprtsl, 'Qrt IMr► Ii+ltl,• Mf♦ , �2nd A ri.1 Permit ins oattistrv4*0 of a r tIt19" amn�enclnl; from rile _ —�dny of_.._L — mrbtirhanm Awk on rtli ow* PAP0 a larw i., tAo mi U$" 1!1*AM1* Tro subiixe prtaaertt► M "al I9_1_l t:nd ending (in the n c3 cloy off r 1.1 _ South isisiIiii of 661W Ava"o IMOW Y 06 141011 "It of t71sMMd A 19#1 dOWPtIl ri :6 an Oft FM flies t 19 �1 both c'ta)a inclusive, and as often during; said y riod .,Lnd Pzonr N deportnwnt vtfias. three of publication mot salt] M salt] paper was rertulcirly Issued, and in the III ;� 'we ari lno r-O 1h�;+'7 r s••,l .tlolmes 1/►Ur regular anti entire issue of sald ne-:ispnper proper, and not In a 00,11+nt "r or Airs rot s" bns CA" supplement, and salrl noticr was published therein or. the following and COAUNDiml trnw.a). i<uf1W InfOrmstlotl MW be et med dales, to-Mt: fry,t1tMi1 ofte of thu ':u Clwh. 22 , ���?� _ M PATW 1.41l1 1Y CW 14UNTIN(A qNl BEACH Pltul d. Jwnra Clark Publisher Subscribed and sworn to before me thtn 23 day of ' April Nutary Pub Orange County, Callfornla THOMA3 D. 1WYLLIE �1 1Jo1.►y Publ!^.•t;,sil,larnitt Ornnq• County 1+t�r Commfttion EYc1rmt S*pisrt►bar 12, 1 f)4 I l .4ell#CALIF. A 12 , 1 i 1 Hororable Hayor & City Council , City of Huntington Deach, City Hall , Huntirqr,ton bench , Ccllif', , 9261r3 . Gentlemen: fie . Zone Changc 70-20 & Cond . Exception 70 -52 . Wo, hereby appeal tho Planning Commission' s denial of above appl i c at 1 ons on 4-6-71 . Tho Commissionls irote can they Conditional Exception was 3 to j , wit}1 1 member, a friend of the developer abstain- i.nF.;. We be l ievc: that granting one of these applications Is in the toast; interest: of the city and the lard-owner. Thunlc you for ,your cons idc--ratic•n . Very truly yotax`s Joe Evans , Agent for owner, Mr. and Mrs . David Meredith, << � �s ,,• �` ` 193►�1 Beach Elvd . , City, 92648 , -Ory y 7 PHONE 536 2533 �� 70 _ "p r Huntington Beach Planning Commission r w MV WIC./ P.O. a-Ox 190 CAL.IFORNI 92648 May 17 , 191 I TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: Planning Commission RE: Zone Case No . 70-20 and Conditionnl Exception No. 70-52-APPEAL ATTN : Doyle *tiller , C"it;y Adniinistrata,: Paul Jones , City Clerk Gentlemen : Transmitted herewith Is a report on Zone Lase No . 70-20 and Conditional Exception No . 70-52 . The Planning Commission took action on this lnratter nt their April 6 , 1971 meetin. . Their action was appealed by Joe Evans , Agent for owner, Mr. enc Mrs . David Meredith . Applicant : Joe Evans 17931 Beach B:julevsrd Huntington Beach , California 92647 Location: South side of Slater Avenue , approximately 660 feet east of Gothard Street . Present Zone ; Ml. Light Industrial. District Z.C. Request : Change of zone from M1 Light Industrial District to rffl Mobil.ehome District . C .E. Requ��st : To permit the construction of a 137 space mobil.ehomie park on 20 acre parcel of land . Reasons given by applicant : (In Brief) The subject property has soil problems and due to topography the best use at this time is a mobilehome park. Staff Reconnendation.: Denial .......... . Planning Commission action: A. CONDITIONIa. EXC::EPTION NO . 70-52 - Denied _.__.... � . ?.0 No . 70-20 xnd CE No . 70-52 May 17 , 1971 ` Page ROLL CALL VOTE : AYES : Slates , Kerins , Porter , Biggins , Duke NOES : Miller ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Bazi1 'F11E MOTION CARRIED. Reason: The Planning Commission could not get 4 votes for approval . Action to deny wil , fallow the applicsnt to appeal the decision up to the City Council . B. ZONE CASE NO . 70-410 - Denied ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Slates , Porter , Kerins , Higgins , Duke , Miller NOES : None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN : Bazil THE MOTION CARRIED. Reason : Conditional Exception No . 70-52 was denied ana this zone change is not compatible with the surrounding area, The following statements were submitted by Commissioner Higgins: Although it is not considered to be among the most desirable sites , the property can be deve' -Ined as industrial . There are industrial uses that do not impose ;;-. vcy loadings or that require level lands over the entire site . The sub- soil condition and topography do not make it physically incompatible with adherence to the industrial zoning prolusions . It may cost more to develop as industrial over some other use, but financial and pecuniary hardships are not grounds for granting a conditional exception. 1 ZC No . 70-20 and CE No . 70-52 May 17 , 1971 Page 3 To allow a different use to facilitate development of land is not sufficient reason for granting a conditional. exception. Respectfully submitted , K.A. Reynolds Secretary i Huntington Beach. Planning Commission R.O. Box 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 [oil May 1.7 , 1971 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: K.A. Reynolds , Planning Director RE: Brief Review of Zone Case 70-20 and Conditional Exception 70-:52 ATTN: Doyle Miller , City Administrator Paul Jones , City Clerk Gentlemen : The above applications were first heard by the Planning Commission on November 11 , 1970. The Staff recommended denial based on surrourling industrial zoning and industrial uses . To zone this 20 acre parcel MH would be spot zoning . Oa January 19 , 1971 , at the request of the Planning CommIssion , the Staff: presented an in-depth analysis of the 70 f acre industrially zoned property east of the S . P. RR ., , between Talbert and Slate- Avenue , to determine the effect of a zone change on the entire 70 acres . The report indicated that the following problems would result from such a rezoning: 1 . Creation of an industrial island , known as Liberty Industrial. Park.. 2 . Limited access to the existing industrial park from Slater Avenue , which would cause industrial traffic, to pass through residential areas . 3. Encourage owners of M1 zoned property south of Talbert and north of Slater to apply for zone changes . 4. Eliminate one-half mile of railroad access . S . Creation of a break in tho continuity of the central industrial corridoar. MEMOR&NDUM May 17 , 1971 Page 2 . Additicnal comments by the Staff as n part of the January 19rh report were : 1 . Topography and soil conditions are suitable for industrial development . 2 . The entire 70 acre area is developable as nix industrial subdivision with good arterjal highway access and sizeable lots . On March 9 , 1971. , the Staff, as requested by the Planning Commission, presented a .study on the central industrial area between Ellis and Warner Avenues indicating those areas of possible zone change , due to surrounding land use and zoning patterns . The three suggested areas of minor change are located along the periphery of the indus- trial zone and do not include or effect the subject property of this zone change and conditional except '.on. The above mentioned applications were continued before the Planning Commission on several occasions at the request- of the city and the applicant in order to provide addition..L.L information on soil condi- tions . Soil reports submitted by the City Engineer and a private consultant for the applicant are enclosed . On April 6 , 1971 , the Planning Commission denied Zone Change No . 70-20 and Conditional Exception No , 70-52 after failing to obtain a majority vote for approval , f vow ' � 1 .� 'I �•! -( 'r�l! 11,',!,° Cont molt 's, Inc. February 2 , 1971 r:. John A. DeFalco & Associates , Inc . ' 1720 W . La Palma Suite B Anaheim , Calif . 92801 . 4 RE : Proposed Mobile Florae Park or Commercial Site Development Slater Avenue and Nichols Street , Huntington Beach , Calif. Dear Sir: As requested by your office we submit the following study of the feasibility of developing the subject site : MOBILE HOKE PARK : Rough grade , consisting of site precompaction , excavation of approximately 73 , 000 c . y . , import of approximately 16 , 000 c. y. and pad grading for the sum of $68 ,000.00 Excavation unit price of $ .45/cy; import at $1. 75/cy. COMMERCIAL SITE : Rough grade , including site precompaction , excavation of approximately 40 , 000 c.y. Import of 60 , 000 cy. and finish grading . Approximate cost of $127 , 000. 00. Same unit prices apply_ i P.LTERVATE WORK ON COMMERCIAL SITE : Removal of peat area; + 22 , 000 c. y. of peat 0 $3 . 50 c.y. Replace peat with seleSt import , 26 ,000 c. y. 0 $1, 75/c.y. Total cost of special treatment of peat area , approximately $122 , 500. 00. This amount would be added to the rough grade figure of $127 , 000.00 or a total development cost of $250 , 000. 00 if the peat has to be removed. Ver my yours R m e nr President RJP: lkg " 14 111ri•.7111 1, 11 llh5•:1 "7 I (?P John A.DeFalco &Associatesi Inc. Suile U.1720 W. L2 Palma, A+4beUp.Calif.92W3• Phone (714) 778.3679 March 29 , 1971 City of Huntington Beach Rr . 70 1 t, Planning Cor►mission no : Prnpnsefl l!obila llonle nt�rk sit©, at Slater Ave. and Nichols St . , Vuntingtion Beach, Calif. Gentlemen : following is a comparison of the 18 acres parcel :'ohile Home Park A Industrial use. nrll::tri.al use : 10 acres 3 $220400. no per acre valuation AssessemQnts - . (drainage sewer water r o ) 37, ion , rl+, Gradinq of land for Industrial sites & .. e`1�)0 Removal or stableization ofpeati TOTAL COST $60 3 . 301 , 00 COST PER ACRES $ 3 7, or) 0C. " n%,i In 1:or1c! nark uAe: l A acres 0 $27, 000 . 01) per acres valuation Assessenents (drainage, sewer, water & park rnereation) 50, � 0 nradincr of land * Removal or stableization of peat TOTAL COST $S 2 3, 4 00 . � COST PER ACRES 29 , 077 . * The c evelopor plans to create a lake with guni to bottom in the neat area. This would lesson the amount of spaces but would enhance the devolnpment. ;'he lake would aliso be used for drainage for the AdJACORt property in conjunction with a smaller drain pipe. .f OW n Vera co i 0 City of Huntington Beach P.O. 3O't Ito CALIFORNIA 92643 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Februnry It , 071 Huntington Iteach f lannip; Con nission C.L ty Halt Huntington Reach, Ca '-.Mrnta Subject; Soll Study of Meredith Property Zonu Change (170-20 6 C.E. 4170-52 Gentlemen: At your request we have, reviewed the develuper ' s rite development, study. We find that the quantities and unit prices which appear on the Letter from Tri-Countv Contractors, Inc. are reasonable and can be used for comparative purposes. However, for a true economic comparison you should use only the first two paragraphs of Mr. Peterson' s letter. This Would indicate that site preparation for commercial or industrial use would cost approxiinnt.ely $59 ,OoO more then for u mobile home park. For env use it is Lot absolutely necessary to remiuve the peat material in the 2. 65 acres underlain with peat . According to the report of ti. V. Ltiw- master, the area of the peat could be stabilized by the p'.ac.ement of large reek or broken concrete or by surcharging with material from other areas in the site. If a plait for industrial development should call for buildings 1n the peat area they r.ould be supported by relatively short piles. Regarding the potential accessibility of :he site by a railroad siding, it is my opinion that due to the difference in grade between Lh` existit►n railroad track and the majority of t:he site: it would he very difficult: to run a railroad spur unto, the property . Very truly yours., ti. E. ttar[g£ City Engineer HEH;ne .errs TO: Planning Comaieoion rriom, Richund A. Harlow, Acting Socrotary FEE: ,tune Caae No. 70-20 and Conditional Exception No. 70-52 Applicants Mr. and Ara. DivLd Marodith (J ATE = April 6, 1.971 Itic ahove referenced zone chengo and conditional oxcuption ports n W a rat:— . �. t,o construct a 13' space mablinhome park or 20 ecran of land sit.ua tod w i t hri south side of Slater Aveirue, approximately 660 foot aaot or Cothard Strout, in the MI-Light Induatrial District. This matter was heard by the Planning Commission somo time ago at which time the hearing was closed and &cLian continued to alloy, tinjo for further information to be developed. Thin information pertains to an anolysis of the soils report for subject property and a request by the Planning Comniluviun for the Staff to study this general area of the City to datormine ulternut.ivu land uses to the present induatrial zoning. Not long after that request, the City Council requested a ,point inuuting with the Planning Commission to review the proposed airport in t:ho Central Industri,;.1 Section of the Cite. It Woo the consensus of the Commission that any roEjn;-t regarding land use V thln thib general area should be postponed until the C_t-, Council reviewed the proposal for the airport. in view of this information, the Commission continued action on the v�;bject conditional exception and 'Vot. nhange to the April 6, 19719 mooting. At their March 23rd meeting the Council directed the Staff to discontinuo Further study of the airport. The Staff will be prepared to discuss any questions the Commiosion rnny this matter and to present a report on the Central Induetrtal area at they April by 1971, mooting. , MIM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Richard A. Hari.ow DATE: February 17 , 1971 RE: ZONE CHANGE NO,, 70- 20 and CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO, 70- �5 Applicant: Mr. & Mrs . David Meredith Agent : Joe Evans The above referenced zone change and condl Lion al excep- tion Propose to permit construction of a 137 space mobilehome P3014 an a 20 acre parcel of land located on the south side of Slater Ave . approximately 600 ft . east of Gothard St . This m©Lter was continued from the February 2 , 1971. meeting to allow time for the Department of Public Works to prepare it report evaluating the soil condi- tions in the area . This report has beev, completed and a copy is attached for your review. The public; hearing has been closed , therefore , it is up to the Commisrion' s discretion as to whether or not the puhlAc hearing should be reope r!-?d . ' MEW): TO: Planning Co=Luslon FROM: Richard A. Barlow DATE: Vebruazy 2. 1971 RE: ZONE CHAWE Na, 70-20 wnd CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 70- 52 Applicant: cant • David Meredith ' The above referenced zone cage and coed i L i ona 1 exceflt i.on were continued from the January 19 , 1971 Planning Commis- sion Meeting because the Planning Cornmise{on Failed Le obtain four affirmative votes for either approval Gr de- nial of the applications . This action was taken pursuant to the By- Ian's requiring an affirmative vote of four for either approval or denial of any application submi.tLed to the C,oumnission for consideration. The public hearing twa been closed , therefore , after d1_,- cussion, a motion for approval or denial is in order . Commissioner Duke requested that the staff determine from the City Admi.nintrator' s office the price of Lhis land when i was t o to the City for purchase as a offered y corporation yard . A representative of the City Adinini- stretor ' s office stated the price was not discussed beL11USC this parcel: was only one of several parcels under considera- tion. Another site was chosen because it offered advantages to the City that this site would not . Primarily , that the City was able to eliminate a non-structural blight area because the site chosen consisted mainly of 25 x 50 ft . parcels of land that would cause a private developer ex- treme difficulty in developing without the power of emi- nent domain. The cost of this property was approximately $15, 000 per acre . l ' ' 0 � TQ: Plnnning Contnissi on 1•'N.OM: R1ch-nrd A. IiAr. tow DATE; January 10. , 1971 RE : 20'NE CHANGE NO. 70-20 and CONDITIONAL. EXCEPTION NO. 70-52 Applicant : Mr. b Mrs . David Meredith Agent : Joe Evans The above referenced conditional exception proposes to pormit construct ion of a 137 space mohi lehome park on 20 acres s o f land i the N,i i Industrial � p r n e L bh t District . The zone change proposes to rezone the property MiN Mobilehome District . This %aLter wAi continued from the. January 5 , 1971 meeting at which time the staff was to have made an oral presentation pertaining Lo the effect of changing the use of paid property. An analysis of the property to the east acid south will I)e presented rn January 19 , 1971 , indicattrig the mpnner in which the area may be developed . i r 1 :-TAFF III-f'tiRT i()NF I,n:,M: NO. 10- 210 :,nil C.ONII I T I ONA I. FXCIA"I ION NO. 10- '12 A pro I i cant : I)Pivi. Mvrod f th Il.11.L. : November I / , 19 /0 The staff has reviewed Zone Case No . 70- 20 and Condit ionli l Exception No. 70-52 and offers the following informal ion for your consideration: 1 . Both applicationit apply to the same parcel of land , therefore , this report will cover both requests . The zone change proposes to rezone the property from M1 Light Industrial District to MN Mobilehome District and the conditional exception proposes to permit construction of a 137 unit mobilehome park . The con- ditional exception application was Submitted to expedite construction of the project , should the zone change be approved . 2 . The property is situated on the south side of Slater Avenue, 600 ft . east of Gothard St . it consists of 16 acres of land that is zoned and Master Planned for industrial use . 3 . The property to the north acrosQ Slater Ave . Is zoned M1 and is vacant . Property to the east is zoned M1 and a portion is developed into industrial uses,, Pro- perties to the south and west are zoned M1 and are vacant . The Southern Pacific Railrced right-of-way abuts this property on the west . 4. A previous conditional exception application (Condi- tional Exception No. 69-22 ) to permit construction of a mobilehome park on this parcel was first heard by the Planning Commission on July 15 , 1969 . The application was continued to August 5, 1969 to allow time for the staff to study the industrial potential of the Central Industrial Area . At the August 5 , 1969 meet- ing, it was pointed out by the staff that a preliminAry study had been made and would be presented at a Inter meeting. The Commission attempted to continue act-. ion ---------- on Lh( appl scat f on to the August. 19 , 1969 meeting Lo a f low time for a presenLnt i iin of L: .r rant rn I Industrial SnAy to be ,wide , however , Lhe nppi requested that a decision be reached either for � approval or denial . Because of the applicant ' s request , the Commission denied the application; four the following reasons : a ) The mot i on to continue the hearing to allow titre for the 0tafi « cciipleLe their studies of Lho industrial potential of the Central Industrial Area was withdrawn because the applicant requv!-ted a decision for either approval of denial ; thus , the decision to deny based on insufficient in- formation. W b j The fact that peat exists on the subject prope.:-ty does not constitute a hardship. 5 . A zone change application to rezone the property R5 to permit construction of a mobilehome par?: was submitted in September 1969. The staff stated that the final report on the Central Industrial Area was not complete; however, it was pointed our that p;-e- liminary studies indicated that this property was adequately suited for industrial development . The applicant requested continuance of the zone change to the November 18 , 1969 meeting. Due to an inc.idenL between the Mayor and a representative of the appli - cant , the application was wit.ndrawn. 6 . The City considered purchasing this parcel for a Corporation Yard several years ago ; however, the site was not selected. To properly evaluate the site , the Department of Public Works requested a soil investigation of the property. The soil report Indicated than approximately 2 .65 acres has a severe peat problem. The Department of Public Works has pri-1,nri-d ji letter s Lit I. I ng lhrc a woy.s. t.ci (,v(- rc umc, Lhis peat problirm. A copy of l li I s I cUvr has been included for your review, ' , The reasons given by the applicant for filing the applications presently under consideration are primarily based on the topography of the property and of the soils conditions ,. (A copy of the applications are attached for your review) . As mentioned in item no . 6 , then Department of Public Works has submitted three weiys in which this situation can be corrected. 8. The final report for the Central Industrial Area has not been completed by the Planning Department because additional area has been included in the study . Also , the possibility of developing an airport within the Central Industrial Area is being investigated . 9 . Preliminary investigations indicate that the pro- perty is adequately suited for industrial. develop- ment . 10 . There has been considerable discusti• ion of permit - ting mobilehome parks as an interim use in indus- trial areas . The MH Mobilehome Zone has been set up to permit mobilehome perks as permanent uses and not interim uses. This deicsion was made by the Planning Commission some time ego � when it was determined that a period of 15 to 20 years was required to amortize the investment and to finance a mobilehome park. 11 . If this application is approved , it will isolate approximately 15 acres of industrial land from the Central Industrial Area . Approximately 5 acres of this 15 acres is developed as industrial property. 12 . The planning Commission should take action on the zone change applicatio.d first followed by action on the conditional exception. If the zone change application is approved , the staff rccomnends thiit the conditional exception be referred to the Bonrd of Zoning Adjugtmentx to establish such conditions as deemed necessary , with the added condition that in the event 'hone Case- No. 70- 20 Is denied by the City Council , Conditional. Exception No . 70- 52 shell be null and void . It should be noted that the plan for the ' mobilehome park substantially complies wi 0i the requirements of the MN 'Lone . 13 . It is the consensus of the staff that the property should remain in an industrial clnssification. Copies of the staff report for Conditional Excep- tion No. 69- 22 and Zone Case No. 69 • 27 have been included for your, review. 1 i �J Huntington Beach Plannint Commission P.O. Box ISO CALIFORNIA 52848 May 3 , 1971 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: Planning Commission RE: Zone Cabe No . 70.20 and Conditional Exception No. 70-52-APPEAL ATTU: Doyle Miller, City Admintstrat-or Paul Jones , City Clerk Gentlemens Transmitted herewith is la report un Zone Carle 1o. 70-20 and Conn tione.l. Exception No . 70-52 . The Planning Commission took action on this matter at their Apri1 6 , 197:1 meeting. Their action was appealed by Joe Evans , Agent for oilmer , Mr. and Mrs . David Meredith . _ADD1 i can t_: Joe Evans 17931. ;each Bculevard Huntington beach, California 9264' Location: South side of Slater Avenue , approximately G60 feet east of Gothard Street. Present Zonis: M1 Light Industrial District Z .Cv Request : Change of Zone from Ml Light Industrial District to W, Mobilehome District. C.E. Request: To permit the constructLon of a 137 space cobilehome park on 20 acre parcel of land . Reasons given by.applicant : (In Brief) The subject property has soil problems and due to topo.3raphy the best use at this time is a mobilehome park. Planning Commission action: Denied. Reasons given by the Planning Commission for their action: 1 . The proposed zone is .got compatible with the surrounding areas Zone Case No. 70-20 and Conditional Exception No. 70-52- APPEAL Page 2 2. The conditional exception was not approved to establish use , ROIL CALL VOTE: (zone Case No. 70- 20 ) AYES: Slates , Porter , Kerins, Higgins , Duke NOES : Miller ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Bazil THE MOTION CARRIED. ROLL CALL VOTE: (Conditional Exception No. 70- 52) AYES : Slates , Kerins , Porter, Higgins , Duke, Miller NOES : None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN : Bazi1 THE MOTION CARRIED. The following statements were submitted by Commissioner Higgins : Although it is not considered to be among the most desirable sites , the property can be developed as industrial, There are industrial uses that do not impose heavy loadings or that require level lands � over the entive siL•e . The subsoil condition and topography do not make it physically incompatible with adherence to the industrial zoning provisions . It imay cost more to develop as industrial over some other use , but financial and pecuniary hardships are not grounds for granting aconditional exception. To allow a different use to facilitate development of land is not sufficient reason for granting a conditional exception. Respectfully submitted, 4', 14V_0�� K. A. Reynolds Secretary rr MEMORANDUM TOt Planning Comiesion FROMs Richard A. Harlow, AatinC Secretary REs Zone Case No. 70•20 and Conditional Lxjoption No. 70-5c Applicants Mr. and Mras David Meredith DATE s April 6, 1971 The above referenced tone change and conditional uxcuption purtuin to n rocfuuaL to construct a 137 specs mohilehomu park on 20 fscruis of lnnd uituetud on tho south side of Slater Avenus, approximately 660 foot aunt of Gvthard Streit in the Ml-Ught Industrial 01strIct. This matter use heard by the Manning Commission some time ago of which tima the hearing was closed and action continued to ellow times for further ineormation to be developed. This information pertains to an analysis of the soils report for subject property and a request by tho Planning Commission for the Staff to study this general area of the City to determine altornrativa land used to the present industrial zoning. Not long after that request, the City Council reeueated a ,joint neoting with the Planning Commission to review the proposed airport in tho Cuntrul Ind4;trifil Section of the City. It wao the conaeneuo of the Comrnisa3ois thnL eoy report regarding land use w thin this general area should ba postponed until tho City Council reviewed the proposal for the airport. In view of thin information, the Commission continued action on the subject condStional. exception Und zoria change to the April 61 1971, meeting. At their March 23rd meeting the Council directed th13 Staff to diaconti.nuo further study of the airport. The Staff will be prepared to discuss any quuations the Commission may ;-love on this matter and to present a repnrt on the Central Industrtal area at the April d, 1971, meeting. MEMO TO: Planning Commission FROM: Richard A. Harlow DATE: February 17 , 1911 RE: ZONE CHANGE NO. 70- 20 and CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 70-55 Applicant: Mr. & Mrs . David Meredith Agent : Joe Evans The above referenced zone change and conditional excep- tion propose to permit construction of a 131" space mobilehome park on a 20 acre parcel of land locaLed on the south side of Slater Ave , approximately 600 ft . east of Gothard St. This matter was continued from the February 2 , 1971 meetixng to allow time for the Department of Fi;b'Llc Works to prepare a report evaluating the soil condl.- tions in the area . This report; has been completed and a copy is attached for your veview. The public hearing has been c-losed , therefore , it is up to the Commission ' s discretion as to whether or not the public Bearing should be reopened . TOt Planning Commission FROMs Richard A. Harlow DAM March 2, 19'71 REt ZONE CASE NO. 70-20 and C0141DITIONAL EXCEPTION N0. 70.55 Applicant , Mr. E, Mrs. David Meredith The above referenced zone change and conditional exception pertain to a request to construct a 137 space mobilehome park on 20 acres of land situated on the south side of Slater Ave. , approximately 660 feet east of Cothard St , in the MI Light Industrial Dfstrict. This matter was heard by the Planning Commission some time ago at which time the public hearing was closed and action continued to allow time far further information to be developed . A decision was to have been reached at: the February 17, 1971 meeting; however, the applicant requested an additional two weeks continuance to allow time to submit an analysis of the soils report for the subject � property. If the Informrttion to be submitted by the applicant is submitted in time for mailing of this pecket, tt• will be included for your review. Otherwise the information will he presented at the March 2, 1971 meeting. The Planning Commission requested the s tn.fi to study this general area of the City to determine alternative Innd itnes to the present industrial zoning. The stuff was to llnvc: had this Information for the March 21 1971 meeting if possisllc..; otherwise, t:he Information was to he presented at the March 9, 1971 Stud! Sesslon. The staff was flso requested to advise the applicant or this study and request a continuance if the March 2, 1971 deadline could not by met. This study Is not complete huw will her pc•eriuttted at. t.'i(, Study Sv;.Sion. The agent for the applicant has been informed of thtr, iiild will. d ' scuss with his client, the staff's request for continuance: , The Coimnl anion will be advisers of their decision at the March 2, 1911 faevt•ing. �. r.r MEMO : TO: Flanning Commission FROM: Richard A. Harlow DATE: February 2 , 1971 RE: ZONE CHANGE N0. 70-20 and CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION N0. 70-52 Applicant: David Meredith The above referenced zone case and conditional exception were continued from the January 19 , 1971. Planning Commis- sion meeting because the Planning Commission failed to obtain four affirmative votes for either approval or de- nial of the applications . This action was taken pursuant to the By-,Laws requiring an affirmative vote of four For either approval or denial of any alsplication submitted to the Commission for consideration, The public hearing has been closed , therefore, after dis- cussion, a motion for approval or d nial is in order. y Commissioner Duke requested that the staff determine from the City Administrators office the price of this land when it was offered to the City for purchase as a corporation yard . A representative of the City Adcnini- strator ' s office stated the price was not discussed because this parcel was only one of :several parcels under considera- tion. Another site was chosen because: it offered advantages to the City that this site would not. Primarily, that the City was able to eliminate a non-structural blight area bectuse the site chosen consisted mainly of 25 x 50 ftd parcels of land that would cruse a private developer ex- ,dw treme difficulty in developing without the power of emi- nent domain. The cast of this property was approximately $15, 000 per acre . VMV MEMO: TO: Plnnnirg Commi ss 1. on FROM: Richard A. finrlow DATE: January 19 , t971 RE : ZONE CHANGE NO. 70-20 and CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 70-52 Applicant: Mr. & Mrs . David Meredith Agent : Jo^ Evans The above referenced conditional exception proposes to permit construction of a 137 space mobilehome park on 20 acres of land in the M1 Light Industrial District. The zone change proposes to rezone the property MH Mobilehome District . This matter was continued from the January a, 1971 meeting at which time the staff was to have made an oral Presentation pertaining to the effect of changing the use of said property. An analysis of the property to the east and south V will be presented on January 19 , 1971 , indicating the manner in which the area may be developed . r- %t)NF (;A:;h: NO. 10- 20 and CONDITIONAL EXCI- )T I ON N(). 70- 52 AppIIr:nnt : Wive Meredith D:jLv ; November 11 , L9/0 The staff has reviewed Zone Case No . 70-20 and Conditional Exception No . 70-52 and offers the following information for your consideration: 1. Both applications apply to the same parcel of land , therefore , this report will cover both requests . The zone charge proposes to rezone the property from M1 Light Industrial District to MN Mobilehome District and the conditional exception proposes to permit construction of a 137 unit mobilehome park. The con- ditional exception application was submitted to expedite construction of the project , should the zone change be approved . south side of Slater 2 . The property is situated on the u Avenue , 600 ft. east of Gothard St . It consists of 18 acres of land that is zoned and Master Planned for industrial use. 3 . The property to the north across Slater .Ave . is zoned M1 and is vacant . Property to the east is zoned M1 and a portion is developed into industrial uses . Pro- perties to the south and west are zoned M1 and are vacant . The Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way abuts this property on the west . 4 . A previous conditional exception application (Condi- tional Exception No . 69-22) to permit construction of a mobilehome park on this parcel was first heard by the Planning Commission on July 15 , 1969 . The application was continued to August 5 , 1969 to allow time for the staff to study the industrial potential of the Central Industrial Area . At the August 51 1969 meet- ing, it was pointed out by the staff that a preliminary study had been made and would by presented at a Inter meeting. The Commission attempted to continue action 1 • on the application to the August 19 , 1969 meeting to allow time for a prescnLrtion of tilt, (:Pntrnl Industrial ,Study to be made , however, thv appl i.crint requested that a decision be reached either for approval or denial . Because of the applicant ' s request , the Commission denied the application for the following reasons : a ) The motion to continue the hearing to allow time for the staff to complete their studies of the industrial potential of the Central Industrial Area was withdrawn because the applicant requested a decision for either approval or denial ; thus , the decision to deny based on insufficient in- formation. b) The fact that peat exists on the subject property does not constitute a hardship. 5. A zone change application to rezone the property R5 to permit construction of a mobilehome park was submitted in September 1969 . The staff stated that the final reports on the Central Industrial Area was not complete; however , it was poi-ited out that pre- liminary studies indicated that this property was adequately suited for industrial development . The applicant requested continuance of the zone change to the November 18 , 1969 meeting. Due to an incident between the Mayor and a representative of the appli- cant , the application was withdrawn . 6 . The City considered purchasing this parcel for a Corporation Yard several years ago; however, the site was not selected . To properly evaluate the site , the Department of Public Workn requested a sol.1 investigation of the property . The soil report indicated that approximately 2 , 65 acres has a severe peat problem. The Department of Public. Works has • prvpti rv(I ii I oL Li•r. SL111. I rid; t rev w11yU Lu overcome Lhis peat problem. A copy of Lhis IeLLer has been included for your ,review. 7 . The reasons given by the applicant for filing the applications presently under consideration are primarily based on the topography of the property and of the soils conditions. (A copy of the applications are attached for your review) . As mentioned in item no . 61 the Department of Public Works has submitted three ways in which this situation can be corrected . 8 . The final report for the Central Industrial Area has not been completed by the Planning Department because additional area has been included in the study. Also , the possibility of developing an airport within the Central Industrial Area is being investigated . 9 . Preliminary investigations indicate that the pro- perty is adequately suited for industrial develop- ments t' 10 . Thcre has been considerable discussion of permit- ting mobilehome parks as an interim use in indus- trial areas . The MH Mobilehome Zone has been set up to permit mobilehome parks as permanent uses and not interim uses . This deicsion was made by the Planning Commission some time ago when it was determined that a period of 15 to 20 years was required to amortize the investment and to finance a mobilehome park . 11 . If this application is approved , it will isolate approximately 15 acres of ' industrial land from the Central Industrial Area . Approximately 5 acres of this 15 acres is developed as industrial property. 12 . The Planning Commission should Lake a cL• ion on Lhc zone change application first followed by action ' on the conditional exception . If the zone change application is approved , the staff recommends that the totted i t ions 1 exception be referred to the Board of Zoning Adjustments to establish such conditions as deemed nocessary, with the added condition that in the event Zone Case , No . 70-20 is denied by the City Council , Conditional Exception No. 70- 52 shell be null and void . it should be noted that the plan for the Mobilehome park substantially complies with the requirements of the MN Zone. 13 . It is the consensus of the staff that the property should remain in an industrial classification. Copies of the staff report for Conditional Excep- tion No. 69-22 and Zone Case No. 69 . 27 have been included for your review. I I I John A.DeFalco &Associates,Inc. Sail•5.1720 W.L& PAIM0. A+sb.lrM.Ulf-SW3' Phone(7141 77MU79 March 29, 1971 City of Huntington Reach Roe . ,L, Planning Commission i Re : rrnpnsed Mobile Homo Park site, at Slater Ave. and Nichols St. ,, 11untingtion Reach , Calif. Gentlemen: The following is a comparison of the 18 acres parcel between ;dobile Home Park & Industrial use. Indus-trial use: 10 acres 0 $22 , 000.00 per acre valuation S396, 00n . 00 Assescsaments - (drainage, sewer, water) 37, 800 . 00 Grading of land for Industrial sites 127, 000 . 00 Removal or stablaization ofpeat 12�50 TOTAL COST $683, 300 . 00 COST PER ACRES $ 37, 961 . 00 .NIohiln I?omo nark use: 10 acres @ $220000. 00 per acres valuation $396 . b00 . On Assessements (drai.nage j sewer, water A park recreation) 59 , 400 .00 Grading of land 680000. 00 * Removal or stablei2ation of peat TOTAL COST $523, 400. 00 COST PER ACRES $ 29 , 077.00 * The developer plans to create a lake with gunite bottom in the peat area. '"his would losson the amount of spaces but would enhance the develnpment. The lake would also be used for drainage for the adjacent property in Conjunction with a smaller drain pips. J�` 0 to n A6 DaFa co twit of Huntington Beach P.O. sox I" CALIFORNIA 0264 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT February 11, 1971 Huntington Beach rlanning Commission City Hall Huntington Bench, Ca'Afornia • Subjects Soll Study of Meredith Property Zones ChAnge #70-20 & C.E. 470-52 Gentleient At your request we have reviewed the developer 's site development study. Wt., find that the quantities and unit prices which appear on the lett,ir from Tri-County Contractors, Inc. are reasonable and can be used for comparative purposes. However, for a true economic comparison you should use only the first two paxagraplls of Mr. Peterson' s letter. This would indicate that site preparation for commercial or industrial use would cost approximately $59,000 more than for a mobile home park. For any use it is not absolutely necessary to remove the peat material in the 2.65 acres underlain with peat. According to the report of H. V. Law- master, the area of the peat could be stabilized by the placement of large � rock or broken concrete or by surcharging with material from other areas in the a.site if plan for industrial development should call for buildings in the peat area they could be supported by relatively short piles. Regarding the potential accessibility of the by a railroad siding, it is my opinion that due to the difference in grade between the existing railroad track and the majority of the site it would be very difficult to run a railroad spur onto the property. Very truly yours, �t. Z �g� "" It. F. Nart City Engineer HEHtae dAAWIW ' PublLsh PUBLIC HCAkIO; 3 :T Postcards FOR;..... 71 - W Cal 70a 20 � aa�a rx Z+�IAL ACC IN To�S2 s wOTICE IS HERESY GIVEN that. a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible , on VWSY the 3rd day of Nay , 1971 for the purpose of InsamommosomwoOEM considering an appeal to the denial by the City Pl=mLn& ComisSUM of Zone Case 7040 and Conditional Exeeptinn 70-5et our follow _ 1) Zone Came No. 70-20 - from M1 Light Industrial District to MR Mobilehome District. Z) Conditional Exception Nos 70w52 - to permit the construction ter a 137 apace mobilehome park on 20 acre parcel of land in the M1 Light industrial District. The subject propperty is located on the south a idt of Slater Avenue* i approximately NO feet east of Gothard Street . A legal description a in the Planni U is on file � •' artmnt office.p i All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said Zone Case and Conditional &=op tion. FurtEer information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk. DATED: /16/71 CITY OF• HUNTINGTON BEACH '" By: Paul C . Jones City Clerk City Clerk City of Huntington Beach `rhe Huziti.ngto�, :leach Planning Commission, at their regular/.&4 @vAr"ed meeting held M 1OP71�, recommended_ of 02 . If ;Pffov- al has been recommended , the City Council will be required to hold a public hearing in this matter , and it will be transmitted to you prior to the next regular meeting of the Council. A copy of the Planning Department legal n6tice , and a list of owners of prop- erty within 300 feet of the subject area is attached he eto. The applicant in this matter is 'YY , AddressZ79.3/ Tele done ) r" Kenneth R. Reynolds , Planning director ey Able / . c�wa rcl �' . Prc c Mudge A1r`noicl leh ' i:. i;t:r,i•t_c ?4d . 0,Jc)gk, Arellanes 'ZC 70- 20&C ' 7U- 5Z !`1011 ruv3 n , C - I , l t� l �, 6071 David Ave. Los Angeles , W , 90034 Day. Me rr d i t.n Thorn. s J . Gray 7552 5 ) r, 1:er u405 :berhart Ave . HnLe,n. Ikch . , Col . HNLgh . t,1:7 Chicago, 111 . 60637 'Joe EVdAt,s Ih : , :' tc.zinore M. Richardson 17931 1:t. a� h blvd . !,; ,��. ! . it11.11� ►• 6-149 Cerritos Ave . Hntgn . ilc :, , , C.ci I . ')''t; .7 'Z;,'i 901 LoltG DeAch, Ca1 . 90812 focal I ) o , Idaho 63201 Otcc Pi•u1,�: rt_ i� :r,�. •-+ ! Joseph R. Byrd et al 7742 khiw, Ur . 66' Payne St . tintllci; . , Cat . 92b:, 3 Cat . 92w,#7 LltnL forfl , N. Y. 10523 Metr , �rtc i� Li IIhit, t� . B011hA111 August & Clara kohtfs 741 litc r M' M. Holmes 2044 30th St . lint Bc,i . , c.a i. . 926,47 7752 , hntne Dr . Smi Diego, Cato 92104 llntgn . Bch . , Cal . 92L47 Wil T;et�:LEr• !{ . C . Cory James T. Harland 1114.3 ,,5 . Budi-ong Ave . 14')4 .3rd tve . Borth t•1. L. Eleston Los `lej; , Cta l . 90044 � 1620-Wetlggggingt'on Rd . Greet Falls , ,,lonL . 59401 Los Angeles , Cal . 90019 Lau tea S . ��r� ) I\t� l l le leda Wil I r F . Metzler 1 -127 Clr 1,14 . Theodore W. ManLhe .l •11141 S : Budlon Ave , ��� lindci , Cat . �l171�'� 7391 Talbert Ave . Los ' les , Cat . 40044 Nntgn. Beh . , Cal . 92646 Holl L. ►tialker Wm. Re Cars:)n � Earl Q. .. ;�ul.wiler 1114 S . Buy tm, Ave . F.Q. Hox 1422 Mary . .anthei Los geles , Cal 90044 0 8 7391 Talbert Ave . Los Angeles , Cal . 9 02 Nntgn. Br-h. , Cale 92646, Inez 1•:. Scolt tiSYWnod 1.00:1v�rL Doris ii.. GA Ie. 2141, I . `a 1v '3L ; ti�l4 1` . 2 :ird St . 4422 ToMlirnson. Ave. . Phaenix , Ar;x . a 1oCiG Los Angc� Le sty 1 . 9QU 11 Arlington, ,Cal . 92 503 Chf+rte:� 1'utlsl'k� l l Pubird i £, I M. ji,migh et r. 1 890tc i:�7rnt-:- Ave . r I, {arc. 108 Ln Judson ;ring BIdg , Hnt t1 , t�r.Et . , Call .. '�32(i'i7 1•�tldo M , t�rl .� Luvi.c.11 fiyl Mni.n St . g �U0 oh) Em l l of Pecords Itiver:sIde , Cal . n2501 IlCherles +.•Im. I.% Barry 8904 l;rHrac r Ave , R .� I t E%ny M. Kuck Hntgn E1r st.F� r, y P. O. 'Drnwer 9 IS L .S Cut ill a , 'lax . 76014 S.-Yo if Ann p C',11 . 9270 , • '.��,,� ML R • 13'JY'tan Regitt'Crt Ur . LC 70-20 & CG lIntgn . Bch , Cal, , 9,.64t? 70-52 M inn ic. L. Are:1 Mary Manth,ic: 7391 'ra l.berL avc, ? ; c€�,:.►} �. ; . ! ,�);!t.`� Hntgn . ncsi . , Cal. . 92646 Al 1w BuL:-, Acme 11 1 S . Harbor Gtvci , La Habra , (;' 7 Th l 1 I (i t:V. :i C 1 f '•:. C . :: ; c;�, i i 76 iatclaterVe .A SL;iLt- l)lv . of IIi.E,hways Mn n . 13c11. , Cal. . �3 2 U4 L' F . 0 . 11-o-., 2 3�)•''+ , Tv rm.Annex Los l�n S',c� L ' , , Cr, l- .900 54 Fran 1). t•fr_r. rull (icc .-m schn,: 1 r:, + -it.ri.ct 17 Ni cho l E ` 79 71 a m e r- A%/L tg1l !,c : 1. . ; 'Eln lAc :. , C �1 < 47 ; , � . O�1i ALLn : Dist . Sups; . Mab : hradc: r H.B . i ic-MvT,L/Jr}- `."chtw L 772 E. Llaremont 770 - 17Lh SL . pa ra , CnI . 01106 Hr,::bn . Bch . , Cal . 92G4G Att-n : ;liaL . `Upt . 14M L.. Joncs II .h . (hii.on !li &h Wc�hool .20 ►�' . Capel. l,- CuurL 1901 17th SL . Costa i•iesfi , Cn1. . na' 626 lintiin . 1ILh . , Cm) . Attn : Dist . Supt. Pau ch�aff. nur et: i, i 769 Speer Ave . lint Au h . , Ln l . 9 64 G Robert Z1.ebiii L'. c. L A i 917 ( Lh 1A . Sama Monica , ct-1 1 < 901:0.1 Rich�I t d L. lfus L• c:rr V. 0. Ban L0 7 y' linL• gn . 13c11 . , Cry l . 92G49 Tom Iu 11 y t Vtctuv Ul S t•e fono ' 1801) Gold rawest - L . lintgn. lkh . , C81 . 92('146 w t Page #9 - Council Minutes - 5/17/'r 1 The Clerk was directed to Mad Reaolution No . 3330 by title - "A RESOLU- 'fION OF THE CITY CGUNCTI, 0iF 'Pill; Ct'VY 0 HUNT1NfDTON BEACII DIECLAI?ING PRIVATBLY-OWNED) S'BEl T.11 IN VT.11 A PACJ1 U01 't'ftAC11.';� 0JI-XT TO PROVISIONS W BTATE VEH CLN CODS; . " U motion by Matnoy, Council walved further reading of Resolutlon No . 3330, and passed and adopted ne.me by the following roll call vote : AYES: Councilmen: Bartlett,, Gibbs , Green, t'.atney, Coen, McCracken NOES: Councilmen: None ABSENT: Counc ilm,n: Shipley PUBLIC ,TEARING - ZC; N0. 70-20 & CE N0. 70-52 - MEREDITH - APPEAL DENIED Mayor McCracken announced that this was the day and hour set for the continuance of a public hearing from the meeting of May 3, 1971, on an appeal filed by %'oe Evans , Agent on behalf of Mr. and Mrs . David Meredith , 19341 Beach Boulevard , City, to the denial by the Planning Commission of Zone Case No 70-20 and Conditional Exception No . 70-52, as follows : 1 . Zone Case No . 70-20 - from Ml Light Industrial District to MH Mobilehome District. , Conditional Exception No . 70-52 -- to permit the con- struction of a 137 space mob i lehome park, on 20 acre parcel of 3.-and in the M1 Light Industrial District. The subject property is located on the south side of Slater Avenue , approximately 660 Beet east of Go trhard Street . Mayor McCracken declared the hearing re-opened . Mr. Joseph Evans.. representing the appellant , addressed Council and distr.btited Fhctographs of the area to Council . He then spoke at .length concerning the reasons why he believed the Planning Commission denial of Zone Ca:3e ho . 70-20 and Conditional Exception No . 70-52 was unwar- ranted . Cons ide rab lf. discussion was held betwaen the Council and. the Plannii-ig Director regarding the background information on this matter . Mr. John De.ralco, 1720 W. La Palma Avenue , Anaheim, developer of the property, addressed Council and stated that, due to unfavorable soil conditions , he believed the property was unsuitable for industrial use and that mobile home use would be more compatible to th area . Further discussion was held by Council on the matter. The City Attorney read a Legal Opinion dated August 1, 1969, concerning the allowance of peat condition as a legal hardship for obtaining a conditional. exception . Mr . W . L. Hamm, 14682 Monroe Street, Midway City, owner of adjacent property, addressed Council and stated that; he was not oppused to the proposed use of the property as a mobilehomp. parl? ; however , he believed the zone change would prove detrimental to his pi ope rty,, and if approved , he would_ request that it be conditioned on t)le imposition or e. 45 Soot setback From his property line . RECESS Mayor McCracken ca.11.ed a recess of the Council al 9: 1!; P. M. Council r was reconvened at 9: 35 P.M. by the Mayor. • Mr . John De Falcc again addressed Council and stated that: t)io property • owner would accede to the 45 root setback are requested by Mr . damn, the adjacent property owner . page #10 - Council Minutes - 5/17/71 Mayor McCracken stated that he had been ilifCrrimd that there may be a conflict of interest involved due to the. facet that tie it: the owner of five acres of property near the area under consideration) and asked the City Attorney to comment thereto . The City Attorney stated that it was his opinion that unless someone • can demonstrate that this change of zone would enhance the value of his property, he would not advise that the Mayor ' s ownership of naa rby property constitutes a conflict of interest . There being no one further to speak on the matter and there being no further protests filed, either oral or written, the Nearing was closed by the Mayor . The Plafuiing Director displayed film alidez and topographical charts of the area for Council' s information . The Mayor requested and was granted permission to abstain from voting on the matter , A motion was made by Councilman Coen to sustain the decision of the Planning Commission and deny Zone Case No . 70-20 and Conditional. Excep- tion No . 70-52 . The motion was passed by the following roll call vote : AYES: Councilmen: Gibbs , Green, Matney, Coen NOES: Councilmen: Bartlett ABSENT: Councilmen: Shipley ABSTAIN: Councilmen: McCracken MISS HUNTINGTON BEACH CONNIE WIGGIVS INTRODUCED Mayor McCracken introduced Miss Connie Wiggins , newly elected 'Nisu Hwntington Beach) " and congratulated her upon her success . REQUEST TO CONDUCT BUSINESS 14r. Norman Maney, owner of property at 201 Frankfort Avenue , addressed Council and requested that they approve the use of his property for a dress cutting operation . The Council informed Mr . Maney that tale staff would assist him in regard to procedure to be followed in this matter . LONE CASE N0 . 71-6 - PLANNI_ NG_ COMMISSIONRESOLUTION OF INTENT - DENIED Mayor McCracken announced that this was the day and hour set to consider the action, to be taken on ;gone Case No . 71-6 - Planning Comniss ioi Resolution of Intention, on which a public hearing was held and closed on May 3, 1971, and decision de Ve rre d , pending notification from the Huntington Beach City School District of their intentions concerning this property. The Clerk informed Council that they had been suppliecl with the communica- tion from the Huntington Beach City School District informing Council that they had abandoned plans to acquire a school site- in this area . A motion was made by Councilman Green, to overrule the Planning Commis- o ion and deny the change o V zone . When put to a vote ... the motion failed to pass . A motion was made by Matney that action on this matter be conti.nLied for 30 days . When put to a vote , the motion failed tc pads . Mrs . Rita Farnon, owner of adjacent: property, addressed Council In nppos it ion to the proposed change of' zone . pass #11 - Council Minutes - 5/17/71 A motion was made by Councilman Green, to sustain the decision of that Planning Commission; approve 'Zonu Case Ph . 71-6 - Planning Commission Resolution of Intent and direct the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance effecting the change of zone . The motion failed to Paso by tho following roll call, vote: AYES: councilmen: Matney, Coen NOES: Councilmen; Bartlett, Gibbs , Greens, McCracken ABSENT! Co=cilmen: Shipley PUBLIC; (WaNCI - PRECISE PLAN ALIGNMENT NO. 71-3- REF;RRED Mayor McCracken announced that this was the da„ and hour set for the continuance of a public hearing which had been opened on May 3, 1971, on Precise Plan Alignment No . 71-3 1 to plan the street alignment for Lochlea Lane, Banff Lane , Cupar Lane, and a proposed ctreet parallel to and approximately 660 feet south of Atlanta Avenue . On motion by K&tney, Council deferred action on Precise Plan Alignment No . 71-3 and referred same to the Planning Commission for traffic study and report to Council. Motion car -led . ADJOURNMENT On motion by Bartletts, the regular meeting of the City . Council of this City of Huntington Beach adjourned at 10: 30 P.M. to Tuesday, May 18s, 1971s at 5: 00 P.M. in the Administrative Annex. Motion carried . au ones City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, Callfornia earge Co cCrac en Mayor i i f 1 Published Huntington Beach hews Nov. 51 1970. Published Huntington Beach Nava Nov. LEGAL NOTICE 5, 1970. NOTICE OF PUMLIC HEARING LEGAL NOTICE CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 7942 NOTICE 01 PUNLIC NtAMINO NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a pub- ZONE CASE No. iFse Ile hearing will tie hold by the City NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a pub. Planning Commission of the City of Hunt- lie hearing will be held by the City Ington Beach for the purpose of con- Planning Commission of the City of Hunt• sidering a Conditional Exception to per- Ington Beach for the purpose of con• mit the construction of a 137 space mo- sidering a CHANGE OF ZONE from MI bilehome park on 20 me. parcel of land Light Industrial District to MH•Mobilo. In the M1 Light Industris! District. The home District. The subject property Is subject property Is located on the south located or. the south side of Slater Ave. side of Slater Avenue. approximately 660 nue, approximately 560 feet east of (loth• feet east M Gothard Strout. A legal do. lard Street. A legal description Is on file scription Is on file In the Planning Do- In the Planning Department Office. partment Office. Said hearing will be held at the hour Said hearing will be held at the hour of 71W P.M., on November 17, 1910, in of 7,00 P.M., on November 17, 1970, In the Council Chamber o, the Civic Center, the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, California, on Sth Huntington Bosch. California, on 5th Street between Main Street and Orange - Street between Main Street and Orange Avenue. Avenue. All Interested persons are Invited to All Interested persons are Invited to attend said hearing and express their attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed opinions for or against the proposed CHANGE OF ZONE. Conditional Exception. Further Information may be obtained Further Information may be obtained from the City Planning Department. from the City Plsnning Department. Telephone No. 5.16.5271 Telephone No. 536.5271 DATED this 51h day of November, 1970. DATED this 5th day of November. 1970. CITY PLANNING COMMIS010N CITY PLANNING COMMISSION By K. A. Reynolds By S K. A. Reynolds Secretary Secretary JF 1 .4 -90%keu 101 PINES AND BERGER r SUITC 400 CLUNV/I[W •UILDING E�iwj'►'ti 10203 SANTA MONICA ■OULCVsRO HARRY A. PINtB LOS ANGELE3. CALIFORNIA 90067 RICHARD H. QCROER t i[L[►MONL! 8?9-1444 ANO III-GOOD 'I March 23, 1971 City of Huntington Beach ,,, City Council City Hall, Civic Center10 Huntington Beach, California r � � .����.0 G,•..:� ~• ' /�' L!aPr Gentlemen : L/ I reprosent Security Pacific National Dankq as trustee of the Dorothy K. Dechter trust, and Marvin Friedman, as executor of the, estate of Elaine. Fr..iedman, deceased, , owners of lots 1 throuuggh 26 in Block A, Tract 876 in Huntington Beach. Our atten- tion is been directed to the fact that consideration has been given; by your Council, and .by your Planning Commission to th_p rezoning of my clients ' property, despite the fact that no notice ha-s been given to either of my clients. You are requested to, furnish written notice to this office of all hearings and proceedings invo...lving the aforedesc:ribed real property, and particularly in connection with any matters involving its rezoning or the rezoning of immediately adjacent property. Yours very truly, ' JA HARRY A. PI HAP :sb cc : Secux ity Pacific National Bank Marvin Friedman i J 7 7 1 ' J u� . 10 May 19', :. TO: City Council FROM: City Attorney SUBJECT: Zone Change No . 71--5 Upon recommendation of the Planning Commission and direction of the City Council, we submit the attached ordinance to effect change of zoning from C1-0; "Neighborhood Commercial District" combined with oil production and. Cl. "Neighborhood Corrunereial District" to C1-01 , "Neighborhood Commercial District" combined with oil production on 11 .79 acres of real property located on the southwest side of Pacific Coast Highway . Respectfully submitted , DON P . BONVA City Attorney /ahb Attachment Affmdavif of P16fication state or Callfamia Cx%Wty di OrW0110 M C,e " Farquhar, berm; duly awwn on oath, san- ThaiI be is a 4QU�C'1L dtlseu of the United hates, over On sea of twenty-one years. Cl•i•1t, Nsw.,, a w � ni paper off circulation pri oW pubU*r of the marx9 Beach. Y1t0� lid d to H Umgtasr 11mck Cali anda and emulated hi the said Oaua&J of Ortirrgs and elsewbere and publidw for the dls-madnationof lelaal w d artWr nawa of a general dwracter, and has vi bows tide �,,�•-rt�'':- ~ subsaripttaer lot of paying subscribers, and acid paper; bas been -�,,�.---• �•��Y atabllshed, printed and pubHAed In the State of California, and ,-,....,.�•• Ommy of Orange, for at leant one year next before the'publication of tine first lnsarUon of thla notice: and the mid newspaper Is not --' dwoted-to Ove internt of, or pubUaW for the entertainment of any partkuiar claw, prorenion, trade, calling, rage or denomination, or any number thereof. The Huntington Batch New was adjudicated a kol newspaper of general circulation by Judge G. K. Scov+el in dw Superior Court of Oe+utge County, ChUfornla Auguxt 2M, 1037 by order No. A-5931. That tm 20ff • ham... of which do wwxred is a printed copy, was published In acid news- paper at least 011 1e a ue commencing from tllr 19th.- day or _.AUIKUe ._._...__ mn , and ending an ttw ...39tl day of ._ 11N t .— is 773 ., both days Inclusive, and as often during said period and times of publication as said paper was regularly issued, and In the regular and entire issue of said pewspaper proper, are; riot In a supplement; and said ranee was published therein on the tblkwing dates. to-wft: 1973, i2e ere.-e _:Zaa�awc -e-. Pu Isher Subscribed and sworn to before the this 2 U L 11 day of August , it I �- , . Notary Publls Omnge County, California THOMAS D. WrYLN- Nofert public-Ca11fornie Orange Ceunly My Commission E.pirre S•ptisrrber 12, 197+1 i I Huntington ®each Planning Commission P.O. ■ox ISO CALIFORNIA 096" I September 7 , 1971 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: Planning Commission 0 RE: Zone Case No . 71-22 ATTN: Doyle Miller, City Administrator Paul Jones , City Clerk Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith is the PlanninI Commission recommenda- tion for approval of Zone Case No. 1-22 . Applicant : Signal Bolsa Corp . 1010 Wilshire Blvd Los Angeles , Cal . 90017 Location: Northeast corner of . the southerly extension of Springdale St . and the westerly extension of Talbert Avenue. Z.C . Request Change of zone from RA Residen- tial Agricultural District to R1 Single Family Residence District . Reasons given' by the applicant : (In Brief) Intended to commence development on Tentative Tract No. 7495 for a standard single family subdivision. Staff Recommendation: Approval Piann; lng Commission Action: Approved Reasons;.,' `iven bX the Planning Commission .fear e r action: Said proposal is good planning for the City of Huntington Beach. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES : Bezil, Higgins , Porter, Boyle , Duke , Kerins NOES : None ABSENT: Slates Additional Information: There was no one present to speaR ` avor or opposition of said request . Respectfully submitted, Ke A. Reynolds f Secretary � f STAFF REPORT Zone Change No. 71-22 Applicants Signal bolsa Corp. Datet August 39 1971 The Staff has revi:wed Zone Change No. 71-22 and offers the following information for your considerations 1 . This zone change has been filed to change the toning an approximately 20 acres of property located at the north- east corner of the southerly axtsnAlon of Springdale Street and the westerly extension of Talbert kreave from RA Residential Agricultural district to R1 Single Family Residence district. This property is a portion of Tentative Tract No. 7495 which the applttant has currently lending before the Planning Co ssissaon. 2. Subject property is currently within the City of Huntington Beach city boundaries and is Master Platmed Coe arcial and Medium Density. 3. Properties to the north and east abutting subject property Is toned R1 and currently developed with single family homes. The properties to the south and west are within Tsntative Tract No. 7495 and were recently prezoned by the City when Zone Case No. 71-9 was approved. Subject proper- ties are vacant at thL present time but are Nrezoued for al Tingle family to the west and comercial to the south across Talbert Avenue. 4. It is the applicant's expressed desiTs to assure the City of Huntingtor. Beach that subject property well be developed R1 Single Family homes. The applicant therefore, filed this none change to R1 as said property is master planned for coaaercial and medium recidenttal devoilopment. 5. :n view of the above information and as the request does not significantly effect the master plan of land use, the Staff yrecomsaends approval of Zone Use No. 71..22.