Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZone Change Cases - 1972 - ZC 72-22, J.W. Klug Development C �. Huntington Beach Planning Commission • P.Q. V30X 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 August 18 , 1972 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: Planning Commis s iou Fl;: Zone Case No. 72•• 22 - APPEAL ATTN: David D. Rowlands , City Administrator Paul Jones , City Clerk G14ntlemen: Transmitted herewith is a report regarding the Planning Commission ' s denial of Zone Case No 72-22 . The Planning Commission took action on Alagust 1 , 1972 . Their action wav appealed by Mr. John F . Moriarty, agent for the applicant . Applicant: J , W. Klug Development Co . , Inc . 4540 Campus Crive Newport Beach , California Location: Southeast corner of Tal'oert Avenue and the Pacific Electric, Railroad. ZC Request: A change o£ ..on= on a iiroximetely 11 . 49 acres of land f vom M1 Light Industrial District to Rl Low Density Residential District . Rem iven by theapplic�an�t: (In Brief) We propose a Planned Unit Development in accordance with plans submitted, Staff Re�;ommendatiort: Denial, . P' annitngrCow- isvion Action: Denied. easons given by the Planning Commis:;ion for their a(:ti.on: 1 . The proposed use would erode our tax vase . 2 . Th. 1972 Master Plan review delineates this area for industrial use . 3 . A change of zone to residential will encourage requests for other zone changes to residential in this industrial area. 4 . Adjacent property is zoned M1 . 5 . Re-rouu6ing of the Route 39 Freeway may lead to an increased demand for industrial property. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES : Kerins , Bazil , Porter , Boyle , Higgins . NOES : Slates . ABSENT: None. Minority Report: Cimmissioner Slates stated that this property dues not have the prerequisites for industrial land; also , freeway access from. the subject property would be through the Central Park. Additional Tnformation: Seven property owners spoke in favor. One property owner spoke in opposition to the request . Respectfully submitted , K.A. Reynolds Se%-.ret,ary KAR .Jh i I I 1 J •i.�a ;a ni. . ... 11�1 ,. . . . . . .. .1 n2 t .'.. . . I j, �1 t. i; :,, ,. �..;�} ., .�,.11!•�! fis • no i TALHE R 'f CD i -`M J V F — E MI-CD t M1I _-- i C F IR -- i Ml MI __. . IVTAYLOR i S ONl'AROO rDRR i r�1 I r— 1 1 A LfAk ,I ZONE CASE 72-22 A. M1 To R1 '� ' rwv nrc;rcrr r��t n MUNTINGTON ■EARN PLANNING K". i l: ifl� l- T •1tii . K1 ' ��, 111 �'i i .1p1:1C,IIt 11C , hrrti rc. d ?,one. t,,aS e hc. . .. . -i tic] t crr•' L 11v trrl lr>wirli, i!iA ion f(>r your cony M12raLfOn : pl1cat: ion is ,r request P.r) rrr(Iir,, 11 . 411 rccres of land t ,•,„n i11 l. ighk lnaurtrir2i nist. rict t.c.� K1 inslc� 1'arni lv )tc �; i �icr!ce i • tt' ict. . The hrohrrt:v is la:nLed at the souLlie:1st co .:nel• of 'f :+ lt•crt. Avolluc and Lhe Pacific: Electric Rai 1 rn,id righL-o f-%,'.-ay . ' . A will) showing Lho surrounding a rea and lt-ind ii,:c: i nLtached For 11, 1'0 V i.c,W. I'h i s property has been zoned for industrial u>,e s tried its annexation to ► he City in 11)97 . The master plan for this area was reviewed in early lq7' at which time it was determined that: Lhe property is besL suited for industriaal use . A zone change application ( 'Lone case No . 7 t - 36 ) to rezone this property frotn M1 Light Industrial histri.cL to k2 Two Family Residence District , was heard by the Planning Cotmnission on October 19 , 1971 . The Commission reconmtended denial of the zone change because the land is master planned for industrial use . The City Council , at their November 15th meeting , sustained the decision of the Planning Commission and denied the zorce change. A miTIOrity report , submitted by Coami_ssioner Slates , stated that he Feels this property does not have the prercquisites for industrial land ;• also , freeway access from the subject property would be through the Central Park. The applicant has indicated that theyy propose to develop a Planned Unit Development on this parcel if the request is approved . The staff feels that the property should remain in an industrial c .assification to avoid further erosion of the industrial base. Provisions of the State Law and City Code Are such that if the zone change is approved , the Master flan must be amended to reflect a residential use before a tentative map can he approved on subject property . T1ie staff feels that there has not been a significant change in this tr-eri since the Master Plan was reviewed and , therefore , recommend.,; do-ii to 1 of Zone Case No . 72-22 . I 0 Published HuntingtM: Beget, Wawa Aug. 17. 1l72. NOTICIS OF PUSLIC HEAVING APPEAL TU DINiAL Zane case me. 71-n NOTICE IS HEPEOV GIVEN that a pub- lic hearing will be held ry the City Council of the City of Huntington Deitch, in the Council Chamber of the I.Mvlc Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7rtlt7 P.M„ or as soon thereafter as possible, on Tuesday the bth day Of Saplember, 1972, for the purpose of con- siderinj an appeal to the denial by the City Planning Commission of a chongo of ions from M1 Light Industrial Dis- trict. to Ri Low Density Residential Dis• trict, on approximately 11.5 acres of land. T;u subject proWy Is located on the southeast corner of Talbert Avenue and th■ Pacific Electric Railroad. A legal description is on file In the Planning iJepartment Office. All interwsted persons acre Invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against mid appeal to Zone Case 72.2L rurther information may be oatalned from the Office of the City Clark. DATEM August 14, 1972 CITY OF HUNTIN13TON BEACH By& Paul C. Janes City Clock I I ::49TITiON FOA0 . CHANGE OF ZONE S.D.M. 7 IFILING FEE' 0150 & CITY OF HUNTINGT'0N BEACH DATE F:;�Fo .�..._..____..�:�;�IVE© P. O. BOX 190 .__._... .. Marriett If . Lewis and Margaret 11 . Gilbert w COMMISSION ACTION DAJ_2 t �i*h.1 _ _ ►. PRtIPERTt' OWNER N 0 APPROVED IS J. W. KLUG DEVELOPMENT CO. , TNC. C� ENIE' IQNALLY AUTHORIZEn AGENT T [] WITHDRAWN 4540 Campus Drive, Newl)ort Beachr Calif . Z APPEALEO J �� YES NO MAILING ADDRESS w COUNCIL ACTION DATE AC 714 J 546--8801 [] SUSTAINED COMMISSION PMONE NO. D APPROVED WITH CCMTIONS o OTHER THAN COMWSSIOth Z [� DeNIED PETITIONED PROPERTY TO 8E REZONED 0 WITHDRAWN FROMM-1 .'_P FEC.T I V E DATE ORDINANCE NO. TO .......R-1 LOCATION OF PROPERTY ( SIDE OF .STREET , STREET NAME , DISTANCE FROM NEAREST INTERSECTING STREET) South side of Talbert Street, one-quarter mile West:, of Beach Boulevard. .LEGAL DESCRIPTION (SEPARATE LEGAL. REQUIRED FOR EACH ZONE REQUESTED ) Stock "B" an.d "C" ;.(except for the South half of vlock "C" and the ` East 16 feet of, the North-half ,of. Block "C" ) , Tract No. 570 , in the City of Huntixlgtoa Beact%, rounty of Orange , ar) per map recorded in book 19 'page 41 Mi s ce s p q s ll.enrrou Maps , records of Orange County. INDICATE WHAT PLA YOU PAVE FOR IMMEDIATE DEVELOPMENT OR GIVE REASONS FOR REOMSTING THIS ZONE dHAWE. i I -Applicant • requests the. Zone . Change to construct R Planned Unit Development in accordance with the plans submitted with this application. P PP J . W. LUG DCVED'OPMErT Ca., le,pc. `. H.Y.s..� � L41 Pre `tr SIGNAT RE PROPERTY . OWNER OR A HDRIZED AQW .r :S'• -W1t APT. MCMED SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET MUST BE READ AND SIGNED ,81 TMIE Ap�,IQAAIY'• >4, r�'1. ,i. y r;..., .r r; .!- -.l..Il: -'1 1W�' ii.: r�Y�.•i�.Y,. � . 1 ,�rti. r WHITS SLUR •CITY LARK acY ` CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH No. •t.ut•tlrY c�tRn IaweA/•N• CITY Aa7lAtnts'rI1ATOIt CANA 179PAlITMaNTfN{. Cs' REQUEST for ORDINANCE or RESOLUTION bate Request mcdc by Department August 18 , 1972 K.A. Reynolds Planning INSTRUCTIONSt File request In-the Gary Administrator's Office quickly as posalblc but not Inter than noon, one week prior to the Council Meeting at which it Is to be 1 .; tud. print at tyre facts necessary for City Attarncy'I use in preparation of ordinsn:c. In a separate paragraph outline i,rieny rcawn� c!•ur':-: request of Council Action.Attach all papcts pertinent to the stthject. All appropriation requests must be cleared and approved by the Director of Finr nm before submitting to City Administrator's OfCce. Preparation of an Ordinance or Resolution is hereby requested: Zem Case No. 72•?3'' APPM� (Attachad herewith) Denied 1. Latter of tranmtttal 2. Area map 3. Staff repp rt 46 Application t1 DMmd sffeativie date Sipt{edi Approwd as to st+ailablilty of funds City Attorney— Heen prepare and submit priard copies to this office by{ a►, Publis ,;1'717') PUBLIC ii&AW.NG SET yank Cardstock 35 FOR:. .... NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING ,... APPEAL TO DENLAL Zonis C.&& No, ZZ-&2� NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVkN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center , Huntington Beach, at the hour of ...1.- no P. M. , or as soon thereafter as Possible , on _TU,SIda_y,,,_„�_+ the .,Stb� day of ,.-§j2tember- -., 19 72 , for the purpose of i considering an appeal to the Denial by the City Planning Comission of a ehange of none from M1 Light Industrial District , to R1 Low Density Residential District, on approximately 11. 5 acres of tand . Ths subject property is locoted on the southeast corner of Talbert Avenue and the Pacific Electric Railroad, A .le al description is on $ P file in the Planning Department Office. All interested persona are invited to attend said hearing and j express their opinions for or against said to Zoa�ase 7242. I Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clark. DAM:- Assume 1�, 11ZI CITY OF. HUNTINGTON BEACH � By: Paul C e Jones City Clerk i i • 9. 7 2 �. � ctc tit, PM 3 Ek a "y • At, &C l � d e te / 1 - CVPLCP dpf- h� c►: o. -0d Cto 1Z E cl a.&.1. . CL � � • 0 tea. �r ,� -,���i-{.�: �'`' .�,•�„ �� � . loom./ la � r . ct J dL mac. ��t,�tw�.c �ta��t •e�..� .� CQ ! W ti Lo to O b . U HPublished Hunttngf2n Uesch News July Z N r •N, 1972. O LEI3AL NOTICE Nt1TME OF PUALIC HSAAINS 0 ,t{ 2t2NE CA219 NO. Y7-22 U r-t NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a pub. Id lie hearing will be held by the City fri >40 U Panning Commission of the City of Stunt- , C 41 Ch Ington Beach for the purpose rsf con- yt •r1 r-i + s'da►ing a Change of tons on approxi- mately 11.5 acres of seed from MY Light 5; U x Industrlal District to Rt Single Family Iy 0 M Residence Clistritt. Thri subject prcporty VQ IV Is located on the southsist corner if Tolbert Avsnue air! the Pacific Electric QQ tv gsliroad. A legal description Is oii file 44 V 0 In the planning Cepartment Office. n •r1 0Sold hearing will be held at the hour 0 44 4j of h00 P.M., on Au{ust 1, 1972, in the Z to 44 t31 Council Chamber of the Civic Center, 0 y.i 0 R Huntingtan Besc'i, Callfornia, on 911, Strers between Main Street emd Oranpd w N •' All Interested persona ere Invitdd to 0 attend said hearing end express their E'r pr opinions for or against the proposed CHANGE OF ZONE. Further Information may be obtained from the City Plsnnin2 Department telephone No. :3&5211 DATED this :nth day of July, 1972. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION By K. A. lleynolds Secretary U m z co K Q V h. u z w W 0 w w z w w r� Q u City Clerk Cit.; of Hun t fill,toll Beach The Hunttnf;tnn Peach 1'lnnn1ss1-; Co!cnission, nt their meet nr' }sold{�►���X�;�-'-�� ' % �'�, , rec:cm-ascended .�L'::...i/�s..w..-.►_• _Cs..rsw..� .—t . .all,r�r.:a�..n1 i' JL If approval has bean rccaim. endid, the City Council will bc: zequi-ed to hold P. publ is hearing on this matter. . Although there is rr 10 day Appeal period, we sug&est that the m*itter be net for the earliest possibl(: City Council meeting;, because the purpose of any appeal is to have a hearing before the City Council and this in al-oady being accomplished. We further sugpcst that you not accept any appeal , as it will serve no purpose. If approval has been reconrilended other than as requested , the City Council will be required to ;sold n public hearing on this matter. However, there is a possibility that the Planning Commission' s decision wtll be appealed; Lhcrefore, we sucl;est that publicat+on he held off until the 10 day appeal period has e)tpired. if denial has been recommended, the City Lounc t 1 may susurn ri l y deny the request. However, we suggest~ that the matter not be scheduled on the City Council agenda un.Al the 10 dny appeal period has exptree. A copy of the Planning Department legal notice, and a list of ownc-•s of property wit'ain 300 feet of the subject area will he submitted upon your request, The oppl !.cant in this matter is 1 —(31 �•. (AdAress) M-leplsone) �rj +�' , �- 0 0 Kenneth R. Reynolds, Planning Director u 44U ` v , August 14, Xl DavaLcipment Compsn Ltzc� 1 4540, CaG us Drive. 1 / M ort l�aaoh, 92660 \ 1 Atte ration i Mr. Grunt W.Higf � Manager, Special Proj*cta I � 1 Dear Mr. McNiff s Fursuant to OLr telephone conversation of this dates w* are returning your check in the a>munt of 073.00. FLsol va are enclosin a copyof Mr. Mcriovit 's letter of a'peal submitced with his check for Vli* 00 as Friday, August 11, 1972, regarding your nppral to the daniael of Zone Case 72w22, sincer lly yours, / r Pave C, Jones City Clerk PW s air ra. tiomme Moore Ors. ldo M. K�i.itt tr# ' " � Coa .?a Cr . ill is Ado Old Skx1, 4f �I��N1R �. �4lbo� Los An�sren , tifos� is iat Re EBS Lewis lM14�1 4al. 7 , It So Ctil3rw�. ' ' ►l i vo I&i ►,s,, 1 1 f Delia ' •Lid•','•' iE`1'�+ ftr wito opt". of love" A". 1 fttft 1, CA. • � ate � �t ' ;r. � � � Loy Aa�slus, 'Cal,. �, • • . 9044 J�iv. of ►�. , re iirosthei. 'Matilda J. Maet"If i, Ta 1� - tj�: ax 2.34rG took 1--sch, Ca . Coll ixt� T.weibs 1 A Aq�.x 8"9 t, Tth St. .,.�_.�... , otoi +�loa,, WWI . 9Ct�S7 Down ey , Cal . 90241. AoaMt+ .M Oasi54 3} f s, r . ! � Lisetri c �1' ilieft R,�ftWel 'W a Ann trans Um F, Bard�t�x {y ;,n, T od9r! l uathi i Eva CL'aiy�aa r • , '. ;`. -lkt C&I . 94014 7401 Ta ibe ft Ave . 519 13 th Ste 1a at iaa8ton 33"chs cal . llinLg Boacho Ca. koba►dobk a Meat It. Jams Tw ad orn Waftha i 'ilat Oattp "At a, �t:tiss M. E:�oam tys--.-�,� Hkuthai �' YIP �• 739i Talbert Ave*tap �aeawrl�i Cs1 7391 Talbert Ave . SAW cap �ao.h, Cal . r °w, 92646 • s �. Ahr�taitsr$ �; W Dole& Tile C�m' ' � l GotMrd Clara 1P. �i►a oLia +mot oj eta Wathel pt ? 19 ingtou beach, QuI. lGs il. �rll iaaai 7191 Talbert Ave. ;�r,;'• 7 0i+4 . 7tk St. Naaar�t.t"too �, 'Oomwarl►, Carl. 90241 92646 o We Rissaten Frank S. btpixw Talbert Avo. iftbal. Rally ImLogtom Deach a Cad . S, H&VIVArd 5 . # Swet, Cal. 92343 rsair .fir Sap f W 14 4t rl • ai We 'I��i ALt" ft"as +el. 1humM Ave zc• r11«3i jf �tha1 ' T391 Ulbart 0% units fth, Cal 92646 .. Umthel Charitable 'fit 7391 Tr1'b m t I; its bumh Cal 92i6 s .�' � � � .,•- ',illy A Urkm a14 11 IL CITY OF HUNTINQTopi . � ISS �� �,� PLANNING C o-� of 1 the tad. M47 MONtR .. ;. ,. r Affidavit of htfication ft" ofC"Parula County of Orange City o! Huntington Beach George Farquhar, being duly sworit on oath, says: This. hr is it � citizen of the United States, over the age of twenty-one yours. `! That he is the printer and puhl!sher of the Huntington 13roch News, it weekly newspaper of t;enem..1 circulation printed nnct pub• t lished in Iuntington Dcach, California and c:rculatt-ci in the Bald County of Orange and elsewhere and published for the ells-emination of local and other news of it general character, anti has it honn fide anbscription list of paying subseiibers, and said papar hall Welt established, printed and published in the State or Californin, and taounty of Orr+nge, for at least one year next before the publication � of the first insertioa of this notice: and the Bald newspaper Is not f� 0 devoted to the interest of, or published for the entertninmrnt of any ` / � 4 lxirticulnr clays, prnfesslon, trade, trilling. rote or denosnhintion, Or (, , any numlx-r t hetrol. I7te Huntington Beach New was at1judiratetl a legal nc�tvspgwr -. `� . , of gunetal circulation Isy Judge G, K. Scovel in the Superior Court rMI14M li ' of Orange County, Calliornln August 27th, 1937 by order No. A-5931. i.% menu Mitt ,Mir atlrit�i That the _ _ APPEAL. TO DENIAL NOT149 it NtiNttal►4PV4 ZONE UAGE NO lie ilOM s WM ba� h" w �= p� _ cowm 1 of Ito N of whidi the annexed is a printed ropy, waR published in said news- in thl fowilN con ow, 1120 P.M.' ore is ,14M wi paper at least tI�L@ ►6f3_ __ _ h ` 111:4 1"1's�' tlr.: at - - ----- •idoring ,Ns t 1i1 Plenn Cvan commencing from the 2'CI Atl uttl -1 -`- -� U-20, a 7.=-o aiort d om woo p ___.�___.._� do ' of _�._,�__ -_ >'�-.2D, an y.la�A+�ta1 d':�11�,,1'NM� IWSG and M2•01 W680 ifl"I"N t.or •OW91184 19 and ending an the 3 rd d aombinid wltp,olt, le+ldt+OWce..� Nt ay of _+E�11�;llfl.t._ ._ ._.�._ W+'411Y Ropmnuw1 OlstrlGL.11% M IN11 prop-&V Ij Muted'sW rM Of.Av*WA and WOO of MUn1} f sr�• A law AM• dank: 411 1n -_, both days inclusive, and as often (luring sold perlod and t ew=r �or. times of publication as said paper was regularly Issued, and !n the A11,1IPtteMtN tRIPWr-Sm ;itwll" tib± regular and entire issue of said pewspaper proper, and not in a hand sold or "Mot MrW' '1hIM� opini�„:•.lot or ciA oMld +ta/aMl supplement, and said notice was published therein on ttia following Mes, a Lce dates, to-wit: �rrr{)Nr la ff e0 MI011 : �nxn f!1d Olitc►s iA! IM Cip► + , Ib�r►' ecv�rtlN .tN ciq►. tfat'lip' t Publisher _ Subscribed and sworn to before me this 1 day of �j ;'' «�•- .•-- •, ' Notary Public TO: Ora4nRa..Cal nty,.Ca/llfornJI .. " ` •,/J f� / --� h•...-•..w M.•.W........•...............• THOiyMA S D. WYLLI E � S ��',.�t:�.:6;' Nufary Public-CgUic pia i Orar,qa Cot+nfy .. ..�. � . My Cantmi�iton ErsIr41 ...�.. ._.. Sapi'a�r I!, t1>r4 t � • i Ode CLASSIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 12700 KNOTT AVRNUL. SUITZ 0 OAMORN UNOVR, CALIFORNIA •XIFAM ,,CLRANONR (VIA) 897.1077 July 26 , 1972 fZECEIVER CL ERA c!r Y nr 11U)JI iCi1;!I ;?'ACH,CALIF. City of Huntington Beach Honorable C i cy Council �9i JUL 26 j'f l 3C/0 City (:lark P. G. Box 190 Huntington (leach, California Re : Zone Change Case No. 72-20 Gentlemen : We hereby request the City Council hea; and appeal the Planning Commission's denial of this zone change application at their earliest opportunity. We feel we have additional information to present which will justify your favorable consideration of this zone change. Respectfully , M. C. Nickle Vice President MCN: j1 ' I DRVfLOPMPCT • 06141111TRUSTION • COMME"GIAL • INGaM■ • INDUSTRIAL 6 LAND OW&MVI0:O`! 1 IL i Huntington Beach Planning Commission � - • P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 July 28 , 1972 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: Planning Commission RE: Zone Case No. 72-20 - APPEAL ATTN: David D. Rowlands , City Administrator Paul Jones , City Clerk Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith is a report regarding tt,c Planning Commission' s denial of Zone Case No, 72- 20 . The Planning Commission took Action on July 18 , 1972 . Their action was appealed by M. C. Nickle , dice P:-esident for Classic Development Corporation. Applicant : Classic Development Corp. 12700 Knott Street Garden Grove, California Location: South of Ellis Avenue and west of Huntington Street . Z, C .Request: A change of zone on 7 . 23 acres of land from M2-0 and M2-01 Heavy Ind- ustrial District combined with oil production to R1 Single Family Res- idenc.e District . Reasons given by the applicant : (In Brief) The owner proposes to improve this property as a part of the coordinated development of adjoining , presently residential zoned property (which he also owns ) . The site is unsuitable For development as presently zoned because the site is eq proximately 25 feet below the railroad tracks and orients toward existing residential development . / V Staff Recommendation: Denial . Planning Comnti s s ion Action: Denied. Reasons given by the Planning Commissl or. for their action: 1 . The topography of the area prohibits residential development . 2 . The property is suitable for industrial dev- elopment . 3 . Said proposal would constitute further errosion of the industrial base . ROLL. CALL VOTE: ' AYES : Kerins , Boyle , Porter , Bazil , Slates . NOES : None . ABSENT: tone . ABSTAINED: Higgins . Additional Information: Mr. Nickle , representing Classic Development, explained the proposal . A representatAve for a property owner on Talbert Avenue , addressed the Commission and spoke in fe%ror of the proposal . There was no one present to speak in opposition. Respectfially submitted, K.A. Reynolds Secretary KAR:j h I 1 STAFF REPORT Zone Case No . 72-20 Applicant : Classic Development Co. Date : July 18 , 1972 ,, u The staff has reviewed Zone Case No. 72- 20 and offers the following information for your consideration: 1 . 'ITLis zone change is a proposal to rezone an 8 acre parcel of land located on the southwest corner of Ellis Avenue and HuntiUstrict. ton ' Street from H62 -0 and M2-01 to R1 Singlc Family Residence 2 . The property is presently master planned for industrial use and was the subject of a zone change previously considered by the Planninngg Cottaiiss ion (Zone Case No . 71-42 ) . Said zone change .roppoosed to rezone subject property from M2-0 and M2-01 to R2 Two emily Residence District. The applicant later agreed to accept R1 zoning on said property. Uie Planning Commission denied subject request at their February 1 , 1972 meeting for the following reasons : a. The topography prohibits development of this property for residential purposes . b . Subject property would be goad industrial pr-%perty if E11ILe Avenue in extended wes;-erly. c . This mould constitute Further erosion into industrial zone property. The Planning Commission reconsidered their action on February 15th at the request of the property owner. At that time , the Commission discussed replacing subject property with other property to be zoned industrial . This reconait .Zration was prompted by a request from a member of the Cot ission %•hat the applicant substitute industrial acreage that would be lost by rezoning this property for residential purposes. The Planning Commission reaffirmed their, original decision for denial and added, as a reason for their action, tt the property offered as trade is being considered for industrial use on the Master Plan. The Planning Commission' s decision to deny subject zone change was appealed to the City Council . The City Council. denied the appeal on May 1 , 1972 . 3 . The appplication states that this parcel is proppoosed to be developed as a Mlgle family residential project along wvi.th the ad ooning Mnue* cel known as Tentative Tract No . 7b01 located north of Ellis It also states that the site is unsuitable for developawl. as presently soured becauas the site is approximately 25 ft. below the railroad tracks and orients towards existing residential developmats . ZC No. 72-20 � Page 2 These points were discussed with the Planning Coamission when Zone Change No . 71-42 was denied. It was pointed out in the stuff report that the staff agrees that the difference in grade between the railroad tracks and the Adjacent property is a significant factor; however, this could also create an extremely undesirable situation with single family homes being constructed below a railroAd track. The staff feels that the method of treating this situation should be discussed in detail with the applicant . 4. It is the feeling of the staff that the conditions surrounding Zone Change No. 72-2C do not substantial) differ from the facts discussed when Zone Change ito . 71-4 was ennsidered. In view of this , the staff feels that the seVion taken on Zone Change No . 71-42 should be sustained and therefore , recommends denial of Zone Case No . 72-20. � 1 ..�.�wrrr��ww. raaew• �Nlil 1 1 CF - Ft a■•: # M1 R1 l _ Z3 T f R3 M1-0 ,_,_f�3 ' R R5 so peR�ir l AVE � .., •it l ZONE C,4"*)"E 72-20 FI , M2-0 AND M2-01 MUVTWJICM MACH auNtiNorto�+ � ru�w� az�r. .00' .� HUNTINGTON BEACH CHAMBER of COMIMEgCE 1 ibltZ UAW 8OULEVAM, SU"I! M HUIVTINOM !l LCK CAUPOf+e" I" i♦uNinNr,TOy BEACH lluctusk 21, 1972 TO- Hotiocable Maycr and Members of the City Counci!, Cite of Huntington Beach FROTH Board of Dirr.ctors, Huntinctton Leach Chamber of Commerco SUBJECT- Council Agenda C'-G ; Zone Case 72-20 - Request for Hoarinq by Classics Develormec,t Corl,oration By vote• of the Hunting,.on Beach Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors this day a recommendation is tnacle to the City Council that this request by Classic DeveloXment Corr-oration b,, hj,ard by tht: City Ccntncil rind th:�t th, y r-v(:r1-1!lQ this ! l,-annl n=! Commissi. n dc.'ni ll ti rcz,on urLi iil _ n, rt;' 'rc 2 to y . . R- C1assi ; states that this 1� n� is to�o�r� Iiically , �i deep swale, a n sui t: d for ir_Itistrial drrvalopment but can be develoyed and is in fact , orlent,�d towards res.t- dential uses already existing in this area This land is an eight (B) acro corner parcrA of lend . All three (3) othor co.;ners tit this intersection are zoned h-1 or 11-3 . Two of the corners are already dovelciFed with R-•1 residences . The Chamber of Con,rn`rco, although as anxious of rotal.ning as I much industrial zoned land a. is the Planning Commission , in this case agrees with Classic that this eight (8) acres is not good industrial land and should be re.?Oned to residential to be developed compatibil. y with adjacent residential rroperty towards which it is oriented , Resnoctfully submitted for your considerat+,on. Roger 13. Slates President RDS/jw / Publi.sh� .13/72 Pi k Card took FF UBLIC HEARING SET ••� OR:..........D....� .( ...1... .......... NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING, .............::Pz '..Ze2" !.1..... /�,ppEAL " DflI7►I, ��� ZOC�E CAS�E _AQ . 9295-W 1 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will. be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach , in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center , Huntington Beach, at the hour of •00 s o 7 . P. M.p, M, , or as soon thereafter as po .eible , n _..hyild!ly._.r.�. the 21st day of Amust ,, 1�_71, for the purpose of considering x13xeiKax&xxrfxxswxx an appeal to the denial- by than Plannl.ng Commission of Zone Cads No. 72-20, on acres of land from M2-0 and I,12-01 1;e.avy Induatrial District , combined with oi.1 production, to R1 Low Density R®oi.dentiel District , The subject property ie located nouth of Ellis Avenue slid west; of Huntington Street.. A legal deucription in an file in the Planning Department Office. All interested persons are invited to attend said 'Hearin, and express their opinions for or against said appeal to or�ial of Z.C. 72&20 Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk. DATED: 7/27172 Clrl OIL FiIMINGTON 'BEACH By : Pnul C . Jones !;f_ty Clerk I� _100C�dc a■I■wwrlI CLABBIC DEVIELOI'MLINT CORPORATION 12700 KNGTT AvaNus, SUITR 0 OAIID[N 0MOVt. CAL.W. 1NIA 9104P Timsp c-tm e7141 ao%-1077 July 26, 1972 �:�� ►'' �� ,i RECEIVED :I1 ` CLERK ci •Y or HUNTING 10i ,?[ASH. CALIF. City of Huntington Meech Honorable City Council In',"' -JUL 26 'ON : 5 7 C/0 City Clerk P. 0. Hors 190 Huntington Beach, California Re: 'Lone Change Case No. 72-1.0 Gen t 1 enjen: We hereby request the City Council hear and appeal the Manning Comnisaian ' 8 denial of chip none change epplicat: ion at their earliest opportunity. We feel we have additional information to prevent which will justify your favorable conniderution of this zone change. Respectfully , M. C. Nickle Vice Prenident MCNs•i1 :.•mac, o •j �,�. Encl. t ��t'•�. ONVOLOPIMf14T • CONOTWOTION • Ce.MMIMGIAL • iNCOMN • INDLIMTII A. • LAND • 01USCIVISION r 4 _- ■I I Publi-j!•e!d Huntington Oaich flews July 6, Iri72. LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEAflINO ZONE CASE NO. 7220 NOTICE IS FIMCU GIVEN that a pub• lia hearing will bo held by thu Clty Planning Conumsswn of It r City of Hunt- in0nn Minch for thn purl)r,li- of Can• biderin; a CHANGE OF IONL on ;r97 Acres of land from 1.12.0 and M201 Heai.y Ineustrinl b strict combined w lh oil production to R1 Ei;igte 1"A1,111y nesi• deuce. Thu Subject pro,:e►ly is locAlud suulh of Ctns Avenue and west of Hung iri`lon Sticel. A le Ynl descritttia , a on file in the Planning Department Office. Sa d hearing will bu livid at 11•c nourr Of 7:OJ P.M.. on July 18, 1972. In the Council Chamber of Clio Civic Center, Huntinglun beach, California, on Sill Street between Main Street and Orgnge Avenue All Interested persons Are invited to attend !aid hearing And expres-, Ittcir opinions Iar or aRainsl the proposud CHANGL Or ZONC. FurlliLr nfurrnation may be oblained from Ilia City PlennlnK Department. Telepliorie No. 536 5271 DATED this Elm day of July, 1972. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION By K. A. Reynolds Secretary City Clerk City of Huntington Beach The HuntLngtonABeacb Plan ng Cesmmi sion, at their regular meeting hel �' , recommended If approval has bean recommended, the City Council will be required to hold a public h-earing an this matter. Although there is a 10 day appeal period, We suggest that the matter be set for the earliest possible City Council meeting, because the purpose of any appeal is to have a hearing before the City Council and this is alveady being accomplished. We further suggest that you not accept any appeal, as it will serve no purpose. If approval hart been recommended other than as requested, the City Council will be resquirnd to hold a public hearing on this matter. However, there is a possibility that the. Planning Commission' s decision will be appeal -id; therefore, we suggest that publication be held off until the 10 day appeal period has expired. If denial has been recommended, the City Council may summarily deny the .re uest Elowe:ver, suggest that the matter not be scheduled on the � q r we 88 City Council agenda until the 10 day appeal period has expired. A copy of the Planning Department legal notice, and a list of owners of property within 300 feet of the subject area will be submitted upon your request. The applicant in this matter is (Address) (Telephone)_ Kenneth R. Reynolds, Planning Director By .__,_.....� ' wait •CITY A.S111K rr ' CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH fro.•, . 414 � •et*r ctatrtle 00111110 .Y CITY ArJMIN1iYa1ATOle Fim REQUEST for ORDINANCE or RESOLUTION CANhMY •OtiA11YMNNTAL ' e Itequsyt made by Department J" 31 191 9 2 1C.A. it lde ?lamina 1USTRUC`f•fONSt ?rile request in the City Adminioncor's Office quickly as pomibie but not lAter chart noon, one week prior to the Cound Mardr4 at which it is to be introduced. Print or type facts necessary for City Attorney's w in preparation of ordinance. In a separate psutgraph outline briefly reurons for the request of Council Action. Attach all papers pertlnent .a the subject.All appropriation requs:ats must be dared and approved by the Director of Finance before submitting to City Administrator's Ofrce. Preparation of an Oreinance or Resolution Is hereby requenedi Zoos Cairo Noe 72-20 (Attached herewith) le Lector of tran=ittal 2. Air" leap 3. Staff 'Report 4. Application Desired effective date SiSrteds Approved as to availability of Rends Au�at 21 1973 Dirtxtor ut Phmw City Attorney--Phase pmpore and submit printed mpies to this office bye E.TITION FOR ' 'HAKE Cif- :�`���N IF P. O. FAUX 190 OAT E. PFtOP�:RTI' c?�'NEf7j. . . _. ._. .. _ ... _ .--•-- -- ,.. ' ; �1�'F'NC�� f-I� {.'('NI'•I'T K',NA^,.! +.f 111.11 'rJEC�I. I) n.(-c'lt. Ct.,r ,Jc?Y ;, t i • �� AUTHORIZED AGENT `'rl1f�S�f;AwN I2,70L, Knot, t-. S1 GI, ovc APPEAL-ED ': YE:`.; MAILING ADDRESS �., COUNi;IL Ac,riON OATS 7.11 �6381 4 .') 0-- y �" SUSTAINED t:0MM ISS IUN PFiQMt N0. { l___] APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0OTHER THAN COMMISSION'S I:--7 DENIED PETITIONED PROPERTY TO HE REZONED LA WITHDRAWN __.. FROM M2•-0 & M2-01 EFFECTIVE DATE ORDINANCE NO. TO LOCATION OF PROPERTY ( SIDE OF STREET , STREET NAIAE , DISTANCE FROM NEAREST INTERSECTING STREET) South bide of Ellis Avenue projected and Eant_ of the Southern Pacific Railroad tract,s • LEGAL. DESCRIPTION (SEPARATE LEGAL REQUIRED FOR EACH ZONE REQUESTED ) 1 See Attached. r INDICATE WHAT PLANS YOU HAVE FOR IMMEDIATE DEVELOPMENT OR GIVE REASONS FOR REQUESTING THIS ZONE CHANCE. This parcel is proposed to be developed as a single famil%7 residential project along with the adjoining parcel known as Tentative Tract 7601 . � The Owner proposes to improve this property as a part of the coordinated development of adjoining, presently residential zoned property which he also owns. , 4, The site is unsuitable for development as presently zoned because the site is approximately 25 feet below the railroad tracks and orients toward existing j residential development. 44� t t.!/''� i. G'/r �• fir! .. �. �1!C.i' �� .� SIGNATURE OFPROPERTY OWNER OR AUTHORIZED AGM a T14E ATTACHED SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET MUST BE READ AND SIGNED BY THE APPLICANT -010�cd�c ��-Me CLASSIC DIEVIEL-OPOMENT CORPORATION 12700 KNOTT AVENUE. SUITE OAIIDIN GROVE. CALIrORNIA NAO4r 7zI.apmeNs 17►141 097.1077 August: 18, 1972 ^: rrUK,,hUTI �97a �U6 18 City Council City of Huntington Bench P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Bench, California 92648 Re : Zone Case No. 72-20 Gentlemen : Due to the necessity of our engineer , Ronald W. Martin, being called out of town on business we respectfully request a two week postponement of this scheduled hearing. We feel that his appearance is most important in the presentation of our case. Thank you for your cooperation in this request. Respectfully, M. C. Nickle Vice President MCN: j1 DEWLOFyiNT 0 CON/TRUCT'Ink I 04MMIFACIAL • INOOM! 6 INIDUOTAIAL • LAND • GVDGIVIGION Affidavit of � lication am At C*Wwwa 004mty or Grange City of Huntington Beach i Oftrge Farquhar, being duly ssworn on oath, says: That h,- b it citixen of the United States, over the age of twenty-one years, I That he In the printer and publisher of the Huntington Beach News, a weekly newspaper of general circulation printed and pub- Ushed in Huntington Beach, California and circulated in the said County of Orange and elsewhere and nuhlla11ec1 for the dissemination of local and other news of a general character, and lino it hona fide subscription list of baying subscribers, and %aid paper has been � ntablished, printed and published in the State of California, and � �✓ County of Orange, for at least one year next before the hubliention of the flea Insertion of thls notice; nncl the snict newspmper is not devoted to the Intert•st of, or published fur the eniertninment of an)- particular claFft, profession, trtide, enl1li , mice or denominntton, or t l} any number thereof. _ The Huntington Beacrh New was udJudicated a legal newsi►+clxv *wow IMtntlr*o Boo iwo of general circulation by Judge G. X Sccnvel to the Superior Court u9t 1% sort of Orange County, 001fornla August r1h, 1937 by order No, A•5931• lotmo[ " MYIL" 11t11l401 & _ IWN[ @AN W& we Th i at the . ....__ .p 1._PA �'Q - M"tc[ Ili MRN�It y INVE me •a �QN�i pvblk ~n[ will be MMra,W 1*w 0V _ UABE rJ0,�2--26 _ _ _ �:earrtou W tl" 00 a IitlrttNr t iw.aM of which the annexed is a tinted copy, was i�ubllal�^ci 1n said nW11. M ins iCowtot! litra+pilr' P iCor 1 .t�unth+ggrn i1011o, 0,Yaw 0 in F,W, «- tas am WOW as l-, '— Af---r- we Am 1_ttigr off t3 a ty 19M wr taw rwt"*• w ow hater at least _ _-._f'tI�_._..� �.� . __. ._ ...__ .____. .�_ __ CHtr of ill OWN commencing from the --10 ? day of _Au Ei t _-- 7as d tr v dfHoa-1e 0 30 DMotrtot to PS Medtwn 14h DOWAV 1114114- 19.�2-, and ending on the -2Q11L day of _A�f��t___.__ _-___- '�'"�'t a'efL d f Do& IM+M�'Ot � t�so+ae stta a ..a e� Itr wowd' silts+ of It►oltotM oft"'. R •Z;w tt►m 1s on fDMa s oroimPIPFUNW. 19 LA1 both days Inclusive, and as often during said i►erlal and 0"kil• y"fir?'i' od times of publication as said paper %vns regularly issued, and in the ..All In n� +ibud d ts�O regular and entire issue of uiid pewspaprr proper, and not in a opinlau � ( stab IGrTMs t�oa. supplement, and said notice was published therein on the following Furt1w t oa IVWV� bra of w dates, to-wit: from'tflo oe.y�thfi CAV d NN. Aura- �-9 77 Iw1VL 1OF UNTIN`R MI •[ACrM f C.Ity C!r'tc l� J -�r Subscribed and sworn to before me this __Y___11h_-.__ dny of r•�'�rj� , ' t AC 00 Notary Public y Orange County, California tt�J , ,.•,,N„..+� THOMAS D. WYLLIE Notary publ;c•C.14ornia Orange County My COMmI10on Exoi►ss s.ptembor 12, 19?4 0 (Pubilshed Huntington Reach News Aug- uit 10, 1972) NOTtCR OF PUBLIC HLAIZINO APPM TO BI1111ML ZONR CAiR NO, 710-39 NOTICE 18 HEREBY GIVEN VW a public hearing will be hold by the Wly Council of the City of Huntington Sarah, In the Council Chamber of the ChAc Center, Hunt{ngton Basch, at the how of 700 P.M., or ee soon theN fflw as po"ble, on Monday 111a 21st day d August, 1972, for the purpoes of 000- siderlm an sppml to the denial by the City Planning Commission, of Lone Cash No. 72-M for a change of cone an L90 acres of land from R5 OHlcs Professional District to 11117 Medlurn High density Real- derNlal District. the subject pro{farp In k"Ied 200 It. east of Beech doulowd, South of Holland W". A legal descrip- tion is on Ilia in the Planning Department Off loe. All interested persons are IrMterd to ettend said hearing and emprom their ooinlons for or Winst said Zone Ceee. Fwthw Inlvrnetlon may be ebWMW from Ifw offictis of the city Cleft OATECr 111/1/M CITY Of HUNTINGYM HMH bin ati c0. gyp` Moiling Addrem P.O. sox 3126 FULLINTON, CALIFORNIA 92634 / I1ola Ihf' kt• Y It) Y001' tLINFIe' I101!0111j ritOCJS ---- ---- - - �_ . __ . _ - - - .; RED, u 2-151 C. Orangefhorre Fullerton, �alilnrnlo 4)�j n!��+r Telephone 1714) 079.01 11 r�NCTU.y r7 Or CI�� August 3 , 1972 City Council Post Office Box 190 Huntington Beach, California Attention: City Clerk t Reference: 'Lon` Case No. 7 --26 Gear Sirs : We are hereby appealing; the Planning; Caindssion re-comenda-tion for denial c. the alove refeiN--nc ed zone case and ] quest a i)ubl i c hearing with the City Council. We: feel thio property is compatible with the presen R-3 to the North and provides a transition between the comnercial along Beach Boulevar-i alxl the single fay ly residences to the East. Ne feel the present R--5 zoning in this location would not be. as comp'-dble_ a,) a 4--plex home and income development, therefcre, we request the opportunity to present our case to the City Council , Very truly yours , COVINGTON BRCI'f;PRS i '[Jtl .l /y',f*'iI. Vice President J]Qi:sk L � i' .JJ Huntington Beach planning Commission v-- P.O. RC`X 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 August 9, 19i2 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: Planning Commission RE: Zone Case No 72-26 APPEAL ATTN: David D. Rowlands , Ci�y Administrator Paul Jones , City Clerk Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith is a report regarding the Planning Commission ' s denial of Zone Case No. 72-26 . The Planning Commission took action on August 1 , 1972 . Their action was appealed by Mr. J. Richard Huffman, Vice Pre3ident of Covington Brothers . Applicant: Covington Brothers P. O , Box 3128 Fullerton, California Location: 200 feet east of Beach Boulevard, south of Holland Drive . ZC Request: A change of none on 3. 55 acres of land , (393.66 ft. x. 393. 88 ft . ) , from RW Office- Professional District to R3 Medium-High Density Residential District. Reasons gives by the applicant : ( In Brief) The proposal is to develop this property into 13 4-plex homes . Staff Recommendation: Denial Planning -Commission Action: Denied. Reasons ,aiven by the Flannita—Comaiission for their action: 1 . The proposed use would increase density. 2 . There Is an abundance of multiple development. 3 . Thisproposal would nui. be compatible with single family residencerr . 4 . This are+s can be developed under an R1 or R5 zoning. 5 . A 1972 dealsion by the City, master planned tits area for an, R5 zone . ROLL CALIF VOTE: AYES: Kerins , Porter, Boyle , Bazil, Higgins . NOES : Slates . ASSENT: None . Additional Information: Mr. J . Richard Huffman, representing the developer,, explained the proposal. Two property owners spoke in opposition. Respectfully submitted, K.A. Reynolds Secretary KAR: j h oil ���mu�in■ mi�imm� all I CF-- E N • i'OR'!' l.�:i►: i.se: No . 72-26 'Ipp I i ;IIIL : ('ravinfQ72 Lon Bros . �lugUsL 1 , ;'! ►: ? i has reviewed 7onc� Case No . 71 -26 and of f er-s the fo l l owing i nil' , , i►. i.on for your consideration : application is a request to rezone a 3 . 59 acre parcel of land iocal-od 200 ft . cast of Beach Blvd . on the, south side of Holland Drive t t „n► R5 Office Professi-onal District. to R3 L rifted Multiple family l:csioence District . I I :e propc-rty was zoned C2 in 1963 . A Resolution of Intent of the 11 inning Commission to rezone the property R5 was approved in January 1 1167 . The property has remained in the R5 classification since that el;-etc . The rezoning to R5 was the result: of a Master Plan Study of this I-f?7 hi 1966 . In February 1972 , the Planning Commission and City Council. approved a Master Plan revision for Study Area "B" which in- + ►ided the parcel in question. It was determined at that time that the and beet use of this property is Offices Professional . -Ije, e have been two attempts to rezone subject property and the parcel -)u the. north side of Holland Drive to R3 , The first request was filed i i� 1068 . This was denied by the Planning Commi.ssion For the following This use will result in a traffic problem on Holland Drive and vithin the subdivision to the east . t . lbere is no traffic signal located at Holland Drive and Beach Blvd 'l'he Planning Comomi ss tones decision was sustained by the City Council . ► , 1901) , the Commission denied the request. for the following reasons : This use will result in a traffic problem on Holland Drive. 1) There is no traffic signal loceted at Holland Drive and Beach Blvd . The property is taster Planned for Highway Commerc.fal . 1910 , the property owners submitted an application to rezone only that p a rant_-rty located on the north side of Holland Drive from C4 to R3 . The i' 1 ,Linning Commission recommended denial of this application for essentially t:ho same reasons as outlined in the two previous zone changes . The Planningg Commission ' s decision was overruled and the application was �. pproved . One of the conditions of approval was that Holland Drive be t;c rmi.natc-e: in a cell-de-sac to eliminate through traffic into the resi- d eiic- ial. sut,..! tvision to the east . 'Ibis , in effect , eliminated the concern f o r the lack of the traffic signal on Holland Drive . Whcn reviewing the master plan in the latter pert of 1971 and early 1972 , it- was the policy of the City to reduce densities wherever possible . Th i,.; request: does not comply with that. policy . They appl icant has not sulxnitted any information indicating that the pro- purt y is improperly zoned and has only stn ted that the dove l oper (Caving Lon Bros ) propose to develop this property with 13 four-plex homes and LIiat: the us(! will provide a reasonable transition between the Ill to the ertSt. And the commercial to the west . r i J� i' t-ovi 5,.ions of the State Law and City Code are• such that if the .,one change is approved , the Muster Plan must. be amended to t•eflect a residential use before n tenLative snap can be approved On SLib j vct property. IL hi the feeling of the staff that the applicant has not 'iubsta t t 1 i n is et this request and , therefore , recommends denial of /only Case No . 72-26 . 1 f �I �1 JII 1 i Publish Ln 7z PUBLIC H7. l ING SET link Cardstock � FOR...... :,.,...... �..... ,4 /1 NOT iC E OF PUBLIC HMI NG APPRAL TO DEW AOY+iS CASE Xo a .7246 NOTICE YE HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Bea;:h, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the Dour of 77 :00 P. M. , or as soon thereafter as poe@ible , on Monday the 21st day of ___ August �, 1972 , for the purpose of considering an apr.eal to the denial by the City Planning Comission, of Zone Case No. 72-26, for a change of zone on 3 .59 acres of land from R5 Office Professional District to R3 Medium High Density Residential District . The subject property is located 200 ft , east of Beach Blvd. , south of Holland Drive. A legal description is on file in the PImming Department Office. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said Zone Case Further information may be obtained t.-am the Office of the City Clerk. DATED: 8/7/72 CITY OF• HUNTINGTON 11rJiCH By: Paul C . Jones City Clark i Published Hunlingtoti Beach Plows July 20, 1912. LEGAL NOTICE MOTICt OF PUBLIC HEAVING ZONE CASE NO. 72-II11 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a pub- lic hearing will be hold by the City Planning Commlo4lon of the City of Huntington Heach for the purpose of con- sidering a Change of Zone on 359 acres of land from R5 Office Professional Dis- trict to 03 Limited Multiple Family Ras- Idence District. The subject property Is located 200 ft. e■st of Mach Blvd., south of Holland Drive. A legal description Is on life in the Planning Department Office. Ss'd hearing will be held at the hour of 7too P.M„ on August 1, 1972, In the Council Chrmber of the Chic Center, Huntington Beach, California. on 511% Street between Main Street and Orange Avenue. All Interested persons are Invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or aq iinst the proposed CHANGE OF ZONE. Further Information may be obtained firm the City Planning noportmenL Telephone No. 5386.5271. DAUD this 70th day of July. 1972. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION By K. A. Reynolds Secretary Mailing Addrdso, F.O, box 3128 FULLERTON, CAUFORNIA 92634 hold the kuy' Ir) your lutu_i•e liatislrip- rii� 0% ; a� CITY��{� , 2451 E. Oranyerharpe ivlleiron, Cohlomm M tF Telephcnc 17141 e79•0111 (wrocT�.NT ��� AU�lrit' 3, 1�72 /lry, ,� �► ' 10 a� City,, Council Post office Box 190 Huntington Deach, California Attention: City Clerk Reference: Zone Case No, 72-26 Naar Sirs: We are hereby appealing the Planning Ccarmi.ssion ircolrtiniendation for denial on the above referenced lone case and request a public hearing with the City Council. We feel this property is canpatible with the present P-3 to the North arxi provider. a transitionL�etween the colnnet- cial. along Beach Boulevard anJ the single family residences to the Last. We feel. the present R-5 zoning in this location would not l.ki as compatible os a 4--plex home and inccne (levelopment; thexxsfore, we i i-qut;s t the, opportunity to present our case to the City Council. Very truly yours , COV114GTON BRO'ITIERS ') P % , r• J. ic. liu 'rr:iai17 Vice President jVji: sh 5 RECEIPT Date ' _� 19 '328 FF� Received From— Address I V 5" if ZaC'�azGz Dollars $ Z5' For. . 7t9k_ O ACCOUNr NOW PAID A/.1 t. OF CASH _ ACC(J AMT. PAID CHECK `r NALANCC ►AOt:FY �v -- - - Du ._. ORDER l_ _ �k ;i=��b • U805 DEPUTY cin CLERK City Clerk City of Huntington beach The Huntington B ch Planning Commissi , at their regular/ meet! g held , recommended If approval has been recommanded, the City Council will be required to hold a public hearing on this matter. Although there is a 10 day appeal period, we suggest that the matter be act for the earliest possible City Council meeting, because the purpose of any appeal is to have a hearing before the City Council and this is already being accomplished. Wt further suggest that you not accept any appeal, as it Will serve no purpose. If approval has been recommended other than as requested, the Citjr Council will be required to hold a public hearing on this matter However, there is a possibility that the Planning Commission's decision will be appealed; therefore, we suggest that publication be held off until the 10 day appeal period has expired. If denial has been recommended, the City Council may summarily deny the request. However, we suggest. that the matter not be scheduled on the City Council agenda until the 10 day appeal period has expired. i A copy of the Planning Department legal notice, and a list of owners of property within 300 feet of the subject area will be submitted upon your request. The applicant in this matter is • 000/00 (Address) (Telephone) .�- Kenneth R. Reynolds, Planning Director By ', Ask AT WWWN Lug GITV tr pc' Y OF HUMINCTON BRAd1 ssw-t:irr trYwATOw j Q REUEST for ORDINANCE ar RESOLUTION �ANAA7�(�i�AA'1`tMatNTA1. ' nesliirrt nt by 1mv USt x.A. IstyrioldsMing ImiltUC'1'ION$i File n4' west in the City Adminiamtor's Wke qukkiy so pow"but not later thm moos, apt week priar'sa die f"wjmi V wag at wWck It is to be isewdueed. Print or type (wets "Isary for City Atturney'm we lu rrepwstiot of ardissum. Is a w fasts outlbw 6dwa ftxmu for flee of(.oua►cI1 As�elon..*teach all thwat to the sub t.All riatiam rA wt tit y ►�+� i'�t� 1+r� �N� �� be red aid approved by the Director of Finance before submitting to City AAministrstor's office. ar udon is hereby mquetted, i Zara Cass !!a. 72-26 '' Affl (Attathad hserWith) �uuiad �` i . 14ttrr of troineaittal 2. Pxoa asap 3. Staff Mort 4. Application i Ikiired effective slate Strrescii .' �.._.. Approved as to availability o1'funds 1 August 21 j 1972 err- , Director of atriartee � City Attorney— Mean prtpare and submit printed copies to this offke b; City AtMilW-:0Lqff W1 3,, f-. F FOR CE OF ZONE .; EE 415�J 2+� ',GCIO HUNT1��( ';*0N qE ' HPDX 1190 _. .. ...._ •-�a• 1f1::{ �' ' � '�i 'i. '. ��:- � C��R�,i ..` 1��.'• {i'_ I:�I` :.-�1L��� �Y .i 1 /J �_� FOnPERT Y - wrhEri I c^ 1. 1 ,, '• r . 1 E _.._. 0 Ni. _. CD rHoRIZEc� AGTNT l WITHDRAWN (',A ifc)i1,L � ):'E�JL4 z APPEALE_0 4. YFS `_..l FJO MAILIM ADDRESS ; w COUNCIL ACTION HATE__ ' S CC t TAWEn �MMI SSION .._..._ US P11(7NC NO APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS OTHER THAN (:OMMISS;ONk: z [-: DENIED PETITIONED PROPERTY TO BE RI IONED ; o _ �_WITHDRAWN FROM_ EFrECTIVE i ORDINAL, c NO. TO i LOCATION OF PROPERTY ( SIOE OF -TREET , STREE+ NAPAE , DISTANCE FROM NEAREST INTERSEC—ING STREET) 3 . 59 Acres South of Eio1larxl D1,i-ve, 200' * FAst Of �•-ar.li �31vc; . LEGAL DESCRIPTION ( SEPARATE _EGAL REQUIRED FOR EACH ZONE': REQUESTED ) y See attached Preliminary 'Title Report for I.ega.l description. INDICATE WHAr' PLANS YOU HAVE FOR IMMEOIAT!: OEVELOPMEN" OR GIVE REASONS FOR REQUESTING THIS ZONE CHANGE. Coviggton Brothers propose to develop this property with an R--3 development consisting of 13 plex rze and income development. Proposed zo1 a change from R- to R-3 will act as a reas=ible transition between the existing R- to the East arx1 the existing Cco mereial to the West and is eampatible with the R-3 cievelopment to the iim-Xcliate North. 'r { �• 1 r NATURE - = R p Y UW VE R OR AUTF QRI7:ED A aT THE ATTACHED 5UPPLEMEN ;AL, Sr ET MUST' BE BEAD AND SIf:iNl�l � 8Y THE t PPL';ICANT f• ''kN 1 '� .'.� 1 '` ,9Rf \ .i l. y�f. •1� I , 1 cr'�'L�_, �• �� ' + I S ,��IY Il J .r. I. .•C7:�l• .G--'•!S .. 14 DDT { i -1► I :f'�7' : .1 1 . Y, r.).i1� ��;t/i1�W�N 4,;h Z., I IC 72-26 swllt lstis r A bo , "WO 4 St. Los i l"O is. 90020 ` !c tfA�12� . 0L� �r�i��lo �11 Y ft1ler:��+ ca. 926X �l l�s�t Ave. South Fmi 'rm*. D. C. 10003 1)2647 %ft. Y.ren Devel t 4krrle F. Autrey 4" W. Ct►. f Ira. opswa 331 Wo Till act. Y p. 0. N R long b"mb. Cal. 90$06mrrpext fresh,. Dilit. t"aaia 'Viww Stbool Dist . WwWell Ias awc Gnsdans E. Waaoa *1972 Warner Ave. 6611mo a mandosa 17301 Markim Lam mkmt 92647oa Doemw1 . Hills. Cal. g2 64t 7 o�� 0'aI S i Cexua�t Good Die t . Russell Cc. Xal to r.• be Nettle � : P.O. box 107 W1O ' enWrr Blvd. 9691 Mawaor � Salta Awry v Cal oo "702 Salta A Gardra Graver t cal.. No. Nall raroad, Cal . 91104 92 644 State Div. of 1hrys . Artho J. f .;►rah B. Singla!iq P.O*Bm 3128 3331 Booty Cir. 17321 Warlmn La. t . ftllertrn, Ca. 92634 i tt Brsch� Cal . ilamtington beach, lgd�t�9 92647 , 1 Lm"eyrt toss Ater b• • =341 l& J . Ciardull t 17362 Id"h Blvd . 1616 K. 11roadwa Marken La, OmtINOtOn Bumba Ca1it. Santa leas, ^-a1 .Y92706 itm►$taw Bsa�. , 92b47 92647 ti Cssatr Prapirt ire lWad fordo be► i 1 io U . Garcia 611 Seats Crux Ave. 81 Slater Ave . 17 51 Markem La* WaLe Park, Ca 1 . %. 023 frsrtLOOM beach a Cal . t ington Beach, Cal„ 92667 92647 DuC� Haven ��i�* Yam. FrankFrankr•. 'sIcrk Jr . J�►s L. W'ilsoa Z1 ,aecly Dr . S,172' Ouildars Dr. Va. �,,y on Dave lomrt Cyr. l ,en Brach , Cal . Nunt fngton Beach,CAI . t.o. box "BEd" Z 1 92647 �wrt Bitch 92660 9 Ira E. She ldcn � �s Dj"22 047 Slater ftrkem Lug Vwt Labtoa Em"t ca. 92647 Cal r iaStem biatk, Cat. 7 Jack R. Newton • ZC 72-26 19391 "Wr Cir . Richard D 3usgaa tit = E Ch. Cal . 17442 Mar�w LA* Ebmtingtem Heachs Cael, 92647 • . Nolte William W. Low David M. Cialei h�3l1 Ott C.'lar. 114 2 1frrlraa 17342 M ASM A. o Rah. cal. s mt iusta u nine V'JOsl. • 92i4t tan 1. l2i4y 92"7 y Jobs X. Lis"346 WHIL" it. popper Rottalie D. Wyllie ' �1lZ irl had i�r. 17472 Marken Lu. 11352 Harkou La. srat Al U"b, cal . aws umungtcm b h. cal. "i47 I3uati nstan ab, Cal . 92647 92647 1*1pb R, �Ir�ad sr leer Timms Cal"Lebus ift Zk u" 86 l Day. oh Cal. 17361 l�askeo Lea. ' tl t�a >aawai� Col. ant am • frmtingtoo Beach, Carl. 9Zi47 92647 fA Van Duren John C. !'i let Ro�e�r A. Wiler is � 8 300 Fo !13?. Holland nd Dr,, 173 81 Marken La. ' Cearooa i01 bias Cat Hrssrie tva Dea►ch, Cal . Htmt irgtou Hoachp dal. ' 92647 42647 Bradford L. Paloes I73 Z Marken La. Frederick L. R11r�ear .' 17451 err Cir. 17391 Marken La Etiagta�q Reach. Cal. Umti�ttfa D+►at�* Ca►1 . ti ton Deeah 9264? g � � ' 92"? 2 7 'kr t, �I John C. raa. He Al-'red L. Way Jr. 17"1 �t Cir. Gtsw►ld C. Perigee 17401 Marken f. Hantiugtou beach. Cal. 173" Ibrkeri Lu. Huntington Beacho 92647 amanDton beach, cal . 92647 � 92647 Cliaia� Mairrill R. Frederick V. I. MscGregor Robert . Radmm �' 17431 Moor Cir. 111ati►tia�t'ert B�oh. Cal. lttea �a�ch� Cal. 17421 Marken lam. I .. ` 97647 9xi4,1 1kMt1O4toa bra+sho Cal• I 93647 Willlw A , Dale Richard R. Rseutsen Jr. i`- Ircev GuarcelloO 17421 tamer Cir. 17422 18arkeu Ln t buaat ing ton beatehp Cal. 1,7431 Marken La. 92 64 7 Ipt it ton Beach. Cal . ;iunt inRton $each►r CAL 92647 '92647 Rduaid C. Ballard W. Baer ,David L. Stanton Jams17401 Ida�lcea Lo. ��7441 !1�►�rkaa Lu. s Cir. 17433 M � . ��toa �h� C�►l. + _ h� �. i"tora h f Cal . 1 rAllshed Huntington Bsseh News Feb. 32,1972. NGM1111 00 ►U�LIO MRAIt1yY SONK CA=t NO.7241 NOTICE Is HEREBY GIVEN Owt ■ pub- lic hearing w11I' be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington such, I,t the 'Counell Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Brach, at the` hour Of 700 P.M., er as aeon thereafter as possible, on Monday the 61h day of March, 1973, for the purpose of con- sidering a petition for a charge of :one on 3.51 acres of land from RI Office Profesilonal District to RI-Pb Low Den- *fly Residential District (Manned Do- velopment.) The Subject property Is lo. cated on the south side of Holland Drive, epproximalely no feet east of the centerline of Beach Blvd. A legal description Is on fila In the Planning Department Office. All interested persons are Invited to attend sate hearing and express their opinlons for or against Said Zone Case, Further Information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clark DATEDr 2/16/73 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By, haul CI Jones City Clark .mow.. ... �� • • .�A� • - � .. l i SC 72-26 C. p. bicklo 17451 MRrk4o La. •. *as ", Cal. I-Mo@ J. CIAWk 1�471 Marken Lr. J lter W. Lawk 11242 W"tborby Ad. L" Atomitea s. Cal . 0072CI L. l o! CITY OF !•SUN i iNGTON a . ACH • U2 SL&t#r Ate PLANNING 1 �~ 1 • r h tUlom M , Cal. C � ,„ � :�� f � �; � 0 �d \ZA Oliver 3. Hadley 4W3 Warwr Ave. owtingtom seach, CAL A1C;lTH � -A.0 'r AT CERTIFIR BY A ffida Vit o foblication l%% 01 CA1111fornia County of Orange �. >ss City`of Huntington Beach 1 George Farquhar, being duly sworn on oath, says: That he Is it citizen of the United States, over the age of twenty-one years. That he is the printer and publisher of the Huntington Deitch News, a weekly newspaper of general circulation printed and pub- lished IA Huntington Beach, Ctlifornin and circulated in the Bald County of Orange and elsewhere and published for the dissemination ` of local and other news of a general character, and has a Bonn fide � ' ��• • �,,. � �1� subscription list of paying subscribers, and Kaid pnixer has been established, printed and published In the State of Californin, and County of Orange, for at least one year next before the publication , of the firs, insertion of this notice; and the said newspaper is not devoted to the interest of, or published for the entertainment of any particular clnss, profession, tnule calling, race or denomination, or any number thereof. The Huntington Beach Now was adjudicated a legal newspaper of general circulation by Judge G. K. Svel In the Supr•.:or Court rn " �Ihrdgsltt+o Hw�tdrwto� QINiOb'Nswa MrF, of Orange County, Califc►rnin August 27th, 1937 by order Ao. A-5931. wa 1W »� j That the APPEAALSQ_ Ntyl'ICt :If •IIg11A4'� titV�`) 'MtM� e ZONE U A SE NO_ 7 2—2 5 _ _ twr+►o..tt�.IM ��;fir'mow:aN;+ a�► of which the annexed is a printed copy, wax published in said news• 0104, to,; CwtNhan+ba+ ; MrMtu+tt>9r+h Matted how 40 paper at least to ow commend fr.,en the . 1► +IL_ da , of _E1_ @t_.__�.__-_---- R 't�curs. Gem a. c m" 192-Z—, and ending on the 10111 day of A—U0,413 t .. -----_---- aw;l7Mshiat .ler A9 MtlMitat', IttMIs"luFlr1,.CIaAt. „.r e" � VW M ;g0MW Awnw awo OWN 1921� both days Inclusive, and as often during said period and tttr�st, atcac�t t+x at•�rt tIM,.+t_ % times of publication as said paper was regularly issued, and in the 1674' �'t M • ON Is.or1' M .In 't" 1'iM11tl� d�Ml•. regular and entire issue of said pewspaper proper, and not. In a 'VWM IGRIsw tr supplement, and said notice was published therein an the following _;All :ptlrtrstbsi,psrsoes.a is kwNld AO dates. to-wit: a""-Mid' tar ww cthtWf seiaMu+ 1M �l ,iMNO� 01M►i Aug. 10 , 15) _ I6=0UM, ja low ubilsher Subscribed and sworn to before me this else of Agguat_,, r � " Notary Public Ora%ige County, California ,...., THOMAS D. WYLLIE s 3 Notary pvbiic•Csljldrnl. Orenye County My Cummillten'.or 5Ip14mber 12, 1414 1 (Published Huntington Basch News Aug- ust 10, 1972) NOTICR OF PUBLIC HKARING APPZAL TO 0111111AL ZONE :AME NO. 72.21I NOTICE 18 HEREBY GIVEN that a Counicil hearing ti of tth City of H n will be itingt n Beac the h In the Council Chamber of the CIVIC Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 700 P.M.. or as soon thereafter as possible, on Monday the 21st day of August, 1972. for the PvToss of CW- sidering an appeal to the dental by the City Planning Commission of Zone Case No, 72•25, far change of zone on 5.04 sous of land from C2 Community Busl- ness Dlstrict, to AS Medium High Density Resldentiel Oistriet. The subject. pro• parly is located at the southwest Corner of Edinger Avenue and Balsa Chica str", exoept for the existing 140 ft. x 147 tion s an( &CIA11 sit*- A legal flit In the Planning dDepart. meat Office. All Interested person■ Bra Invited to attend sold hearing and express their opinions for or against said Zwe Casa, from theineftoficmiatat tho Ci y c a►kt#InW PATECi e/7/72. CITY OF HUNTINGTON $EACH 11p PAUL C. JONEt, City Clerh Mailing Address: F.O. BOX 3128 MLERTON, CALIFORNIA 92634 1 hWd five koy to your future housing needs, ,l R 2451 C. Orangethorpe Fullerton, California VH j,MC Cl jy pf RK Telephone 17141 1379.01 11 I4 8 OF p��A�� ' fgr AUG August 7, 1972 2 � o� City Council Post Office Box 190 Huntington Bea:2h, California Attention: City Clerk Reference: Zone Case No. 72-25 Dear Sirs: We are hereby appealing the Planning Commission recommendation for denial on the above referenced zone case and request a public hearing with the City Council. We feel this property is compatible with the R-3 property adjoining it to the South and West. We feel a commercial site in this location could not support itself now or any time in the future because of its proximity to the Naval Weapons Station which prohibits any more development in this area. Therefore, we request the opportunity to present our case to the City Council, Very truly yours, COVINGTON BROTIERS 'f All J Richar.d Hu ,f lice President ` JRH:sk or ,. Huntington Beach Planning CommisSiOn • ' P.O . Box 190 CALIFORNIA 925" August 9 , 1972 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: Planning Commission RE: Zone Case No . 72-25 - APPEAL ATTN : David D. Rowlands , City Administrator Paul Jones , City Clerk Gentleman: Transmitted herewith is a report regarding the Planning Commission ' s denial of Zone Case No . 72-25 . The Planning Commission took action on August 1 , 1972. Their action was appealed by Mr . J. Richard Huffman, Vice President of Covington Brothers . A pp liicart : Covington Brothers P.O. Box 3128 Fullerton , California Location : Southwest comer of Edinger Avenue and Bolsa Chica Streat , except the existing 140 f t. x 147 f t. commercial site . ZC Request: A change of zone o� 5 .04 acres of land, (518 ft . x 445 ft.�) ,from C2 Community Business District to R3 Medium-High Density Residential District. Reasons given bX the applicant : ( In Brief) The proposal is to develop this property with an R3 development consisting of 19 4-plex homes and income development. The proposed development is compatible with the existing R3 development to the south and west of the proposed site. t 3 Staff Recommendation: Denial . Planning Commission Action: Denied. Reasons given by the Planning- Commission for their action: �� wit raw• i ■i nn■ u r. r' 1 . The applicant has indicated that a market analysis of this area indicates a weak or marginal need for additional commercial ; however, the applicant has not submitted information to substantiate this findings . 2 . A survey of commercial needs within one-half mile of the subject property indicates a commercial deficit of 11. 33 acres and a 2. 21 deficit within one mile of the subject property , if the R3 were developed. 3. The following statements by nearby homeowners are valid : a. The density would be increased . b. Schools would be overcrowded. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Boyle , Kerins , Higgins , Porter. NOES: Slates , Bazil . ABSENT: None , Additional Information: A petition signed by 134 property owners was submitted to the Secretary opposing the development. Mr. Huffman, representing the developer, explained their pro- posal. Four property owners addressed the Commission and spoke in opposition. RespectfulLy submitted, K.A. Reynolds Secretary KAR: j h F EDINGER C2 f � E AU fMY DR. c LINIJACR sCFihCti K A OF? 7 , P�. — 4- . 1- A CHE RYL DR HILO R. .( KAUI DR. r - Z 31330N 1.. U MAUL R. i I LLPLWOLOW Llt�_ - i OAHU , _ R• O f DR . . _ �T , m .. . Y � , DR. C F C o lot ftcIr Al ZC 72-25 C2 To R3 WwTpcnW MPAM HUNTINGTON SUM KAIMNIMA Krr. i