Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Zone Change Cases - 1972 - ZC 72-32, Huntington Harbour Corp
City Clerk City of Huntington Beach The Huntington React Planning Commission, at their requ',sr/old meeting held . , rec.ommanded j If approval bas been recoamended, the Gity Council Will be required to hold a public hearing on thL3 matter. .41though there is a 10 day appeal period, we suggest that the ro.atter be set fe:' the earliest possible Cit1 Council meeting, because the purpose of any appeal is to have a hearing before the City Council and this is already being accomplished. We further suggest: that ;►ou not accept any appeal , as it will serve no purpose. If approval has been recommended otner than as requested, the City Council Will be required to hold a public hearin` on this matter. However, there is a possibUity that the Planning Commission' s dectsion will be appealed; therefore, we suggest that publication be field off until the 10 day appeal period has expired. If denial has been recommended, the City Council may aLm arily deny the request. However, we suggest that the matter not be scheduled on the City Council agenda isntil the ).0 day appeal period has expired. A copy of the Planning Department. legal notice, and a list of owners of property within 30JO feet c.f the subject area will be submitted upon your request. The applicant in this matte: is (Address ) yip": • _. ... ,...lii�.,�. _ ...� ('se l e phonre)._._..,it.,T_ :- 3 A9 i Kenneth R. Reynolds, Planning Director Pubttshad Huntington Beath Newt wept, 21,•197;, LEGAL NOTICE NWIC11 80 PUSLIC HIARI► G ZONE CASt NC. 1142 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a pub- tic nearing will be hold bV the tatty Planning Commission of the City of Hunt- ington Beech for the pu,pose of con- slarreng ■ Chanf r) of Lone Ai a 0.10 se. parcel of 10 from Ct 1.114tiway Com- mercial DIM , to RR Medium Density Resicentlel District. The Subject property is located 300 teet northoest at Pacific Cuaat Highway and 30O feet north W Wainer Avenue. A legal description is an file In the Planning Uepwrnont Office. Sa.d hearing will be held at the hour of h00 FAA., on Cliefobor 3, 311, In the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, huntirAton St+ch, California, Qn Sth Street between Main St►eet and Orange Hranue. All interostod Pe-sons aril invited to attend saiA nearing and express .heir opinions for or against the proposed CHANGE OF ZONE. ru+tner infairs+ation may be obtained from the City Planning Department. Telephone No. 536.5271 DATED this 21st day of September,1972. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION By K. A. Roynold3 Sacrebry • trni •CITY A iV CITY OF HUNTINGTON MACH No. •LVRZ•CITY CLIKFIK LRIIK , NARY •CITV ^00011114RTMIKH eTnATOQf RUgUEST for ORDINANCE or RESOLUTFON CANARY •CitirAaITMRMTAL � hate Requtst made by ��� Dtpa-tsnent Now. 1, 1272 K.A. olds _A. �► llaaalaln,� INSTRUC IONS: File request In the City Administrator's Ofiitee quickly as possible but not 6w than noon, one week prior to the Council Meeting at which it is to be introduced. Print or type facts necesiuy for City Attorney's use in preparation of ordinance. In a separate paragraph outline briefly rerwna for tie request of Council Action.Attach all papers pertinent to the subject. All appropriaticn requests must be cleared and approved by the Director of Finance before submitting to City AdminWrator's Office. Prepvs►ion nt an Ordinance ov ltraolution is nerrby irgjeswdi w Zem CSs Was 7 i-32 (Attrs ti' d ber with) Is, Staff Report to Aria No ,I 3e retWo►u for CMMP of looir 1 1 i Desired effective date 94ned a Approved m to oval"". Icy of famh City Attorney •— chains prel m and submit ptlawd eopke to this dWe by � S o s r 0 zl tAW 'J• CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 73- 83 +� COUNCIL-ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATIO MlWTM1C.ifM,MACH �� w Ly To Honorable Mayor and From City Adonis tratoip*.I.L City Council Members Subject ZONIi CASE 7 2- 31 Date J u l y 12 , Zone Case 72- 31 is a request for a change of zone on a 1 . 72 acre parcel (500 ' X 1501 ) from RAO , Residential-Agricultural District combined with oil production , to C4 , Highway ':ommercial with a 50 ' setback from ultimate right- of-way line . This zone case has been pending by the City Council for quite some time , therefore , the following is a brief overview of past events . The application was originally heard by the Planning Commission on October 3 , 1972 . It was denied for the following reasons : 1 . This zone case , if approved, would create spot zoning . 2 . The determination of how the property to the ncrth and south of subject property will develop is unknown . J p P Y P 3 . A commercial use would create traffic and safety hazards . The Planning Commission' s decision was appealed by the applicant and was heard by the City Council on November 11 , 1972 . After public comment , the hearing was closed. Action was continued to December 18 , 19729 to allow representatives of Sanitation District No . 11 to consult with the Sanitation Board regarding the possibility of the District purchasing subject property . When the matter was brought before the City Council on December 18 , 1972 , it was determined that an Environmental Impact Report would be required and the Council , therefore , continued action to February 5 , 1973 . On February 5 , 1973 , the City Council continued the action on the application once again to March 19 , 1973 , because the appli- cant had not submitted a 'Request for Exemption Declaration or an Environmental Impact Report . At the March 5 , 1973 meeting , Councilwoman Gibbs reported that the Executive Board of the Sanitation District took no action to acquire subject property because the City was mile to control. the use of the property through zoning ; however , the District would reconsider the matter if the situation changed . It was decided not to reschedule this matter for Council considera- tion until an Exemption Declaration or Environmental Impact Report had been prepared . i Zone Case 72- 31 July 12 , 1973 The Environmental Review Board approved Exemption Declaration 73-13 on July 3 , 1973 . In -%►iew of this action , the City Council may now take action on Zone Case 72- 31 . Respectfully submitted , David D. Rowlands City Administrator DDR ; eh i i 6ncm o6r CONNIE 6no►n the dean Qer BROCkW,yy � ,fir rcrA wENTWpRTk C{ty cle4k 41 IA J (-jA / ' 1 ' L 11 00)f � � E 2 c L6 e.1,, _ 1 i I �I :..,� • EnVIROnMEnTAL REVIEW BOARD CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH-CALIFORNIA rn', ` P.O. BOX 190 92648 TO: City Council FROM: Environmental Review Board DATE : July 3 , 1973 SUBJECT : Zone base 72 -31 ED 73 - 13 C ) This is to notify you that the attached Exemption Declaration for Zone Case 72- 31. was given final approval by the Environ- mental Review Board on July 3 , 1973 . 6.,L�j � �4c� Carol c wartz , ecr ary Environmental Review Board CITY CIF HunTinvon BEACH J 0 O. WX 190. CALIFORNIA 92e40 PLANNING DEPT. 1714 ) 536••5271 July 3 , 1973 Re ; ED73- 13 fZC 72- 31) t Rinker Company P .U . Box 2480 Newport Beach , California 92663 Gentlemen : ; This is to advise you that the 10 day posting period has expired for ED 73- 13pertaining to : Zone change from RAO to C4 escr p on Brookhurst and Bushard , Huntington Beach oca on and the Environmental Review Board has granted the ex"Pt ion . It is recomaended that you now proceed with the processing of your project through appropriate City channels as established prior to E . I . R . requirements . Cordially , Carol Schwartz , Secretary Environmental Review Board CS :df ° i , 1 J, - +i .. - , . v . . .•4../ .�:. . .ilk •r A J%{ U..7 ITY Oh HUNTINGTON PLACH ' fir .7; ty use ar,ly CI�,C,.�I;CT NUMEI�:R ED �'�- / Rini:er C:►m;�aiiy, a iiivi•ic-1i of WI .It. Applicant or Authorsxc bent l.awl DEPT . OF ORIGIN or Consultant Cornoratiol' kirRhtIT N0 . � _ �q Newr c►rt } eal. rfice f�rlx " , C • Mailing Address Telephone umber John Poole-Chigiiita Corp. property Ownc r c/o Rinker Company Post Office Box 2480 Now port 13, h, Cal. Mailing c ress 92663 N'"TE : `.ot ail h:cjects 1i•i11 necersi-Lace the p . opar.ation o: a :fa.i I y uocumented Environmental Impart Study . In order to hake a determination as to whether any significant environmental impacts may result from the proposed project , the following request for exemption declaration status must be filled out and submitted to the appropriate department. . As soon as possible , the E . I . R . Review Committec will determine whether or not the project will require are Environmental Impact Study and will notify the Project sponsor accordingly . Please fill out the following : 1 . T4 PERMIT : (describe use or project ) This req,iest it; sir rnitted in contler.t9ol. with an application fnr a Zone C;ianoe frorn R.^O to C4. if q-,.'- sect ,'roperty is Zoned C4, the applicant wt-ild propose to dcvulop l•,irnmerrial ,fines "e-i-1 -itted in C4 none, Z . LOCATION OF PROPERTY : 50- reet A .i.irec - ; East side cif Sroul, h!irsb St. �,t- llo 'itc C e � . r; 'A . ..► .) . . %. � . intersection and -ewitlierly termin,ts (if Mist-arri .St. Distance Crum nearest intersecting street : N A Name of nearest i nter!.er.• t i nl; street : 3 . LEGAL DESC{Z I ITION : See aff;ached lespal deFc Hrntivic. 1.0t Block lr. Section i c�h n s l t i l� R a r g o Metes and 13oundS : 7 enSC YE— .l57-111y rn.1ps or -p iotngwloapls a0iirEi wI., ;i Is III Jf0ti; .1:.7nIi.:w the significance of this projoet ' s impact . � . I T 4. Describe brieflyac existing environmentaloonditions in the • aren affected by the projc, t . Sub;ect parcel has 500 fe Bt. of frtm,.age on Brool loirst St. and r1liks tf) a deipti. ji 130 feet (after required widenin!; of Hror►1•-At,rk at. ;. The property in flat and +rntmprnved. The elevation A the t► rr►p,! rty is ,_;�nruXi:rr.�tely one: font below the eleya k-o of Brooh1 mrst St. Viere are r►n trees mi w d- ject property and the only vegitation r•onsl.gts of natrtral t;rasee:: 111d weeds indigenous to the area. The property is abutted b Aruuldc.irst St. on ti,e tiortiiwest and lai►d.i owned Icy 0-e Orange: County Sanitation District on ti,e utter III rev ' o mrlaric:i. T-ic lnnd,r owned by the Saniiation Distri(As are dev`lr-pad with a tiewt= r treatment -]ant. ,. What is beiijg tic;nc to minimize the short tc ITI cffr,ct on the environment caused by construct icon , i . e . , tlust , Miatv'r qua Ii ty working ;lours , rtc . Caustrriction is not immediately .ewitemplated; however, the ar;plicant will conform to any recommended k:onditionri re!,arcM►!•• c:t�ntrol ni ci►,:rt, workirlp hours, etc. 6. Describe brir_ fly oo. positiv, rffects this l�r, icrt I,�il : l�.�tvc on the economic , so: ; ;il , car t•ultur.-tl ;ispo t � cif the cotnmunit•y , Deveiopment of subject property will he cnmpitti;,ie wit: C e zoldl►, :-m oti►er privately held land in the immediate neighborhood. Development of the property, with a small rommerc:iai pr,_, ie(-t w(wid provide needed servires to the cornm1wity. TO what cktollt , i f ;In%. , ►d l l tilt, Nutt: 'Trivial 4igiti f.iL:.l11 C. Project tlisrulit 01• dii" itIC ;1 establ islirtl communi t %• or an 01-derI v s 0 ;111ttt'd art ;, 101VIc Il t :' . ___ _.- _-•_-- - 1 1 "I"XI11 l i ll on s vp0 ra t-0 P:1 e. Y 7i`l , ! s the 1)1'Ojc,rt consistent vi n tlt plIfI :. that havc leell ;IL!optrIl by tile rorrin►ulli ty in which th(: III- oJel: t NO x ye..' is 1 0 4 � t c�cl '? � --- ti • To I►►lat (- N tont , i I ;- 11v $ 1.11 11 illc Nonce Trivi 'll it;rlii iL: all It r(, i �.• t ll:t1'l: ;1�1 ;1�1 (' . r ( ;l f I-c �: t rlti { l.'(1 jC74; l (';1 i i•l'.''.o I (' l' '' nX , �.11ltlil':1A 1'(`titll: I'►' (` 5C o11 l l I'C S tI 1'(' C 9 .! . To wh;lt extant , i I' -'mv , i Or 1)1'0.I C t ill MI :1 1'C;I by unique 1111II'SiC .11 1'04I1 'I1'VS ? b . I the pro ic ct near :I - ShoreI inn No Yv, x:c NRtItt';11 f l ao(l 1) 1Z1 i TI? No xx Yes j Channe I i ;12(1 f I ood p 1 :1 ill? No Yes `�'h Ili l Is i de ? No xx Yes � BI .If f? NC >:u Yes 1(! . Could ;Ill\' (;(,o { 01il: ( slide prollle areas , r;lrth(Itlake f fault ,.. . etc . ) c atiso 1(lvc` r � c condi t ion, to rc•,ul : 1 1,mr, tIl i ` No x:; YOS 1 I . To wll:lt cxtctlt , i I' :I11N• , w i { ! t {►� 1► rojcct (II rupt ter ! 11 (, r Ih(` ,. �l1►rc�1l :Itt�•1.� N (if the �11I' rc►t111�lilll;` (' n(• {' r i t' i ,II �ii ►;n (i ! i ;l nt " of n . Ili , t: ol' iC site' 11,chnc.ulu�; i c:tl s t tc` :' by t)c i ;;1111111' i n I' r(ll►c l- t V OW110 1':; bC xt -- _ disruptOd Il thV )I I- i ('ct '' --- -'- --- 1 ; . TO '.:lt ,lt r t oil t , i ► ;Illy' , l•: i li lho II1-() i0Ct "I !' I'c (' t 'I `.1;11'C(` 11.1tIt I'd I I,VS0►1t'('r It i i 11 1 0,;11e(' t t o Poi (' 11 14 1 -1 1 11•c` " �x 1..\ , .Ik' t i o I I x Co11.-; c' 1,vot II xx ExvI .1i11 oll t':Itt` !►;II't` . i Nona Trivial ] i;Ili I iCaittt . ,, 20 , ' To what cxtc`nt , ;Iffy , will th+ ' project arfr,,rt. thl' Continued llsv of a vocre.itional ,; rca ? b . To wh .t extant , if any , will the project affect an important area of aesthetic valu(, 9 To what c�: tent , i E' .In:' , trill any wildlife be dis -.•tiptvd o . displaced by the project ? h . To wIla t c \ tent , if ;any I n y willil ife migratiolt patterns lie di sruhrcd h), th :� pI.o.ic cr '' c . To %A ;lt extent , i l' ;Illy , wi 1 1 tilliyue vci,et at i v e oommun i tics lie di s ruh t ed or dish ! :Icvd h1/ the' proJoct ? 16a , To whir extent , if any , wi 11 . existing noise levels be incrca:;ed by th is X14 y project ? b , To what extent , if any , will recrea- tional areas be detrimentally of fc'�.ted by noise i nci-ca yes ? r any , C . To what extent if will wildlife an ' areas, he detr ime nt: :Il IN, affected by noise increase? 17. To what c\ t ent , i f any Ivi 1 I the project increase 111r I,u, l I Lit i011 IOVVIS in the .nrc..i or exceed ;my ex i st- it: -Iir I-so111ltit%n staltill . rds '' ( PaI- ticuI :)te Illiltter ( (lust ) as Iry 1 ;Is Chum ICaI pollutants Shaul d he 1g, 'ro Whitt I.'xtcrtt , it' ;Iny , Will :Ili)' unique Ilia •actci- ist ics he illt t'OdUl•rcl t 1 0 ll •1 �� A i I• I%,:I v c l! i s ru p t i o n .' X x 1p, To Idiat c'x toil t , i. I' ;Ill.', bill the 1lrC1l1O -; 'kl I. 1•0 irl• t 11:1VO ;Ill llct r i - rio n t .1 1 ,I f fe c t oil su r f ac t. 01• Still S111- (';I.'V Wlt, 01' sUllpl ivs with rvspoct tl1 loll;l XX (�l1�111 t I t y" x• I'X p I 1111 Il 11 `c'it;I r.,I t I Nei Trivial Si g n i f i can t + 20'. To what extent ,& any , will the project serve to one-Durage develop - ment of Presently undeveloped arca. or intensify development of undeveloped arca5? (Examples i lic i ticie tile i i1 t rc)cillc t i can or I'aci 1 ities such as strect5 , roods , W.-It0r mili11S , Ur SIL-wer 'Ige I Irl(`s ill such a monrivr as to faci I i tat r development or intensi ficat ion of ,;x the Lis o I' :In a rea . 21 . To wliat extent , i1' any , wi 1 I thr proposed 111'0.j"� t has is ovcrn - uicn t a l tic• ry i cc•s ( i lac 1 .id i li+; , Iiu t not 1 imi ted to , police , Ci rv , sewers , schools , roads ) uncl t 1w present and future ability 'la government to xx provide such Services ? 22 . Are there any feasible and less er'. i ronnientzl iy offensive a 1 terna- t ; -es to this project ? No xx Yes I I'lt1NTi:J N,;Ctli: ; c� ) a Divivi"11 ��f W.�l<. C; r c r. l.;tt�c! C, �•ric�ratic�n S 1 CN1:11 : _ QA'TF: .lank►ary 19 PIT; .r rren C. Lr Frhv , v •e Prcr:�nt � M Mailing Addresti . 110x ptin Newk2gri l3vach� Calif:ornia Z 111 Ct11I1: . " l:xl� J .: in on Ilato V . - r� 9. 'h. Subject property is located approximately 1600 fret frc m the: Pacific Shoreline. It is felt that (levelopment of stibJec•t property would have no adverse on the scenic qualities related to the oveatt view. The pruperty iH sittiatud approximatciy 400 feet frut;t the Oranges Comity Flood Control District chaetnrl. IIES^I'►IP'I'I0:': '.11 that certain land situated in the Stato of California) County of Orange, City of Htu,tington Beach , described ar, Follows: The Ilorth 500.00 feet, being 500.00 feet of frontage on Barookhurst Street (Wright- Street) , of the following described land: Begjnning at a point on the West line of the: Northeast quarter of Fractional Sectlor, ?.9, 'township 6 Sough , Range 10 West, S. B. B. & M. , said point beizz at the intersection of said West line with the cei,ter line on ;4right Street, 80.00 feet wide, as deaC-ribed in the ducd re3c:orcicd may 6, IL953 it: Book 24, 9, 1,49e 35 of Official. Records; thence North 3'i° 37 ' 148" East, along said cet:ter line of Wright Street, 579. 66 feu; thence South 52° 22' 12" East 190.00 feet; thence South 37° 37' 4-3" West 820.34 feet to a poi z,t on the hest line of the Northeast quarter of said Section 1r1; the!.ce Nortt; 00 39, 30" West- along said West line 300' .64 feet •,o the poi..t of be,ginniz,t;. Excepting `herefrom that portion lying within Broukhurst Street (Wright Street), as conveyed fx, deeds o.' r.cord. Also e3xcep. Ul��.r^f.4 A . ., -- _4 1 -i l rights, rzi!:aral, ndneral rights , natural gas, natural gas rights a::d other hydroccrbons by whatsoever maze knavri that may be wit-,hi:, or . dur said ltu:d without , hovever, the right ever to drill, dig or nine therefor through the ourfu': : or within 200 .00 feet of the surface of said lard , together with a olnCIc,. right of way r:oZ to exeUed 20.00 feet in width, over, ul.ort- and throuEh said land and other land to and from drill sites lricutud an other lard at-A for the purposes of ittvtalling and maintaining necussary '.n,ility liz.c:s ur.d p! pu lines, s: -jet forth It. the Final Judgment of retiderad In the Orai;i;u County Superior Court iCaoe Nc. 60601, a ce:•:,:1:'ied dopy of which wuo rtcorciud December 31, 1954 in Book 2912, pole 263 of Off l,AW. Records. Affidiavit of PaWication A- 3t�'ltt;-if CR Uforrtla Couy of Orange I. ss v" City of Huntington Beach h d, Cr<•orj;e*'Fitrquhar, being duly sworn on oath, says: That lie Is it t citizen of the United States, over the nge of twenty-one years. 'I'luat he is the printer and publlitaer of the Huntington 11cNich News, u weekly newspaper of general circulation printed and pub- lished in Huntington Beach California and clr,:,jlnted in thy,- ,utld �I - relsewhere� c wblisheA for the d1s.cetninaticm Pe County of Orange and and of local and other news of a general charnetrr, and has it hnna fide subs'-ription list of paying subscribers, and staid paper lans been establishf-d. printed and publisheA ir. the Stitte of Californin, and County cf Ornnge, for at least one year nest before the publication ' of the first Insertion of this notice; nncl the snit! newspalier k not ,1 devoted to the inicn- t of, or published f„r "he entertaintnant of any particular class, profession, trade, calling, rave or denontlnnticm, or any numlxr them-of. The Huntington Bench Ncav v:us adjudicated to legal nea%•siraper PubilshW huntMslon 111"" lows Oi of general circulation by Judgus G. K. Scovel In the Saiperior Court ISO Ism of Orange County, Californin August 227th, 1937 by order No. A•5931. Milo g 1111PIP "I1iat the APPEAL-•_TO DENTAL__.,___.__- . tl . -- tll11 �► ttt�IMgM - s lit; 11"1re MW bi Milli" �lik ,� -, ra I ZONE---1�.r�E NO.�.74`�.1._..-_ - neu u� liar �1qr.of ! .Coomil 1700 *W M tiht of which the annexed Is u printed copy, was published In said news- Carta, HuntitileaaOWN^ N of 7100 P.M., V, as. ael�a 1hpt � pnsei0i% alit li r e paper at least _ �11_—_ . t'aI adr►Itta aw tep�laN in: IN disluM tha City IMt,MM 000i sonar a1, GN No, � .�r commencing from the _ill _ dny of C�C t O t`@ 2` —.__.. __. Come d a ti.70 pc I'mm ft" trick, 1000~ , 1922— and endLng on the -1.4th clay or Oc_>robe„r et, ,c4mi"rol so ft. taliick 1"A of war line, 'fha loc19r."---, both days Inclusive, tend as often quaint; s ald period and r� o�erahvaoft tRtla time!! of publication as said paper was rchrulnrly issued, and in the ond.11wlfrard regular and entire issue of sold pewspaper proper, and not in a d'rascrlpthm is cm ;tilr In low ` supplement, and said notice wag published therein on the following; tiapart~t OM04 , All, 1e00 pio"W rra In100111.10 elates, to-wit: afford sold ,not+;iag &" ,V*r, opIntima fag' or mishwA sold appal. OC t 19�_ 1Q?2 _-- Further Infarrtwtl� -tRltrr► w .s+1a<ainr� from the OfNwa of the Cis► clarlt , OATEN 10/13/7=' . >I Foul C. MIA - Publisher Subscribed and sworn to before me this ...20 __ clay of Qc tobe r r9. .. � Notary Public . . ;;� • i Orange County, California , 4 l" w THOMAS D. WYLL E EFERRED ........116 • u PY COUNCIL ..�.� •`gte'Y f Yl)IIC•trAltlOrnl • ••••• Orange County r t►1S Gommlrrfon 1974 e T 1. , . ���•.� 0" Sep f embrr 12, 191�1 1 � � � ............... .............. r , Huntington Beach Planning Commission P.O. 130X 190 CALIFORNM 92640 TO: Honorable 14ayor and City Council FROM: Planning Commission DATE: October 13 , 1972 SUBJECT: ,"ONE CASE NO. 72-31 - APPEAL A request for change of zone on a 1 . 72 acre parcel (500 , x 1501 ) from RA-0 Residential Agricultural District combined with oil production L'o C4 Highway Commercial District with a 50 f t. setback from the ultimate right of way line . The applicant wants to develop the property into a commercial project. Location: Ap icant: East of Brookhurst Street Rinker Development Corp. opposite the intersection John Poole - Chiquita Corp. of Brockhurst and Bushard P.O. Box 2218 Streets . Anaheim, Califor.-nia Plannirng Commission Action: DENIAL �- October 3, 1972 wrw�rrrrr.. r r� for the following reasons : 1 . This zone change , if approved , would create spot zoning. 2 . The determination on how the property to the north and south of subject property will develop is unknown. 3 . A commercial use would create traffic and safety hazard: . Vote,: AYES : Bazil , Kerins , porter, Wallin, Boyle, Higgins NOES : None ABSEN Slates Commissioners Comments: Commissioner Kerins stated that this property had been reviewed by the Commission in 1971 and it was determined that it was not a feasible commercial site and had been zoned RA pending a determination of what would be a feasible use . Commissioner Wallin suggested consideration be given to some type of recreational use . ; 1 � r Zone Case No. 72- 31 October 13, 1972 Page 2 �- Additional Information: Mr. Marren refilovre , representing Rinker Development Corp. , spoke in favor . Mrs . William Poage , resident in the area, stated that this is one of the first areas seen upon entering the city from Pacific Coast Highway , it should be considered in a especial light , the area is already over-coannercialized and she suggested, in view of its proximity to the Santa Ana River recreational trail , that the property be reserved for a park or rest area . Summary of Staff Report : 'rhe property was zoned from C4 to TRA in 1971 as e. part of Master Plan Amendment No . 71-2 , amending Study Area "A" . The property is undesignated on the amended master plan, because of its unique shape , size and location. Ultimate size of the property is 130 f t. x 500 ft . It is surrounded on the north and east by the Orange County Sanitation Plant . The balance of this parcel ( . 8 acre) and an additional .5 acre parcel to the south , also owned by the applicant, were not included in this zone change . The Commission indicated a desire to see a plan prior to appraving zoning at the time Master Plan Amendment. No . 71-2 was adopted . S.RR o� rtin& Information Submitted Herewith : 1 . Staff Report 2 . Area Map 3 . Petition f.or Change of Zone Information to be Submitted at the Public Hearing: 1 . Vu Graphs 2 . Slid%:s 3. Staff Comments Respectfull submitted , K.A. Reynol s , Secretary KAR:j h attchs . • ' STAFF REPORT 'Lone Case No . 7 2-31 Applicant : linker Development Corp John Poole-Chiquita Corp . . Date : Octobe.- 3 , 1972 The staff has reveiwed Zone Case No . 72-31 and offers the following information for your consideration : 1 . This application is a request to rezone 1 . 72 acres of land From RA-0 Residential Agricultural District combined with oil to C4 Highway Commercial District . The property is located on the east side of Brookhurst Street at the intersection of Brookhurst and Bushard Streets . 2 . A map showing the surrounding area and land use is attached for your review. 3 . The property was zoned from C4 to RA its 1971 as a part of Master Plan Amendment No . 71 - 2 amending Study Area "A" . The property is shown as "undesigmated" on the amended master plan. This indication was given to the property because eF its unique shape , size and location. The ultimate size of subject property will be 130 ft x 500 ft . It is surrounded on the north and east by the Orange County Sanitation Treatment Plant . 4 , The balance of this parcel ( . 8 acre) and an additional . 5 acre parcel to the south are also owned by the applicant and zoned RA. Proposed use of all of the RA zoned parcels (as shown on the attached map) should be discussed prior to approving a change of Zone . 5 . A zone change to C4 Highway Commercial District was recently approved by the City Council. for a ,service station on the northwest corner of Brookhurst and Bushard Streets directly across the street from the subject parcel . 6 . to discussing the C4 to RA zone change on subject property in 1971 , the Commission indicated a desire to sere a plan prior to approving a zone change . The applicant has submitted a plan which is included herewith. 7 . Traffic circulation on subject property can be improved upon. 'Phis can be accomplished at the Board of Zoning Adjustments through the Administrative Review procedure. i ZC 72-31 Page 2 �f 8 . A Master Plan Amendment must be approved prior to the approval of this zone case . The Commission should address itself to the type of commercial uses proposed by the applicant and the use of adjacent RA zoned property at the October 3rd meeting. CR L I CR. r- � I LEILANI � p CK RI pro C4 M - OR /N eliE s MI-A , c ORANGE COYNTY SANITATION TREATMENT cl PLANT o * IL ZONE CASE NO , 72-31 • RA-0 TO C4 1 .72 ACRES NYerTINO'!'�OM �� fLAM1�lA fit. I r �r. l�vCp „• , rah Wl1NTII�G Ii'►� ;'�i '.'II, CAi:I°. Y OEJ all y ; 01 RINI<E,9 C 0 11 P O 11 A l l c, ,, October 12, 1 `37Z The Honorable City Council City of Huntington Beach /L C) l- 5-> Civic Center ; '/a v 5th Street & Orange Avenue 7' �L+LI Huntington Beach, California Re: Zone Change Case 72-31 lirookliurst Street (opposite the intersection of BroOkhlll'st & Busl�ard) Gentlemen: At the planning Commission meeting of October 3, 197Z, our application for a zone change was recommended [or denial. We respectfully appeal the findings of the Planning Commission and request that the Council set a date for a public hearing to consider our appeal, We believe that the Planning Commission findings were errorinous and we propose to present additional facts to the City Council to justify the proposed change of zone. Enclosed is our check in the amount of $75. Respectfully submitted, O Vltarren C. Lefebvre Vlwe President � /jb Eticlosure }' Redhlll at Baker • P.O.Box 2480 - Newport Beach, Callfornla 92063 - Telephone (714) 079.7200 l Portland ;an Franclst;o Nowport Poach San Uiugo i kit) � +, +rsw•r+rw+trmlr�Ylrr r /J _ 1 � 14. . - . o LEILAk;l _.._ . RI \ `, ti 1 S VD r I I� A � } . I Df� !fi► AE ,._ ,. .._�L 1 KAA OW IMI—A gyp\ � \ ORANGE COUNTY � SANITATION TREATMENT �``' `•' �\ c PLANT • Boas ' � `�,�� � �a` ' � ci as rig ZONE CASE NO s 72-31 • RA-0 TO C4 1 .72 ACRES IVKH 4 _u ,GIB r,N h f j R CHANCE OF ZONE FILING FCC l �� // / C .'x�•� .lr� � '('ri ii� l ) -- �AL �.4 . CITY OF Hl1NTINGTON fF i " H P 0. Ho:>i tom..) JA'........... _... Joh■ P'w)► a - Chiquita Corp, ; t. C0MM;S5i0N ACTION DATE . PROP!RI Y OWNER C ; APPf OVE D ( _j CPNNTK'?NAI l--r AF)PRtWEV ltin}•.r. r Ur ;�loptY�r. r,t Corp...�__._._..._ DL NIE0 AUTHOk17FI) AOEN'f F-1 WITHDRAWN _ P, 0. :fox 2218, Anahoirn, Ca. 92804 j : APPEALED YES C^_7 NO Mnll_ING AttItiRESS COUNCIL ACTIC,N DATE (i !'T4- i 4•I3 EJ SUSTAINED COMMaSKJW PHONE NO ..1 APPtMVED ,-W(TW GOO (� ntHEft THAN COAAMIS510 2w I = DENIED PETITIONED PROPERTY TO DE RI ZONED �' `L�.': WITHDRAWN _�- FiiOM RF= EFFECTIVE �; - 4 ! ORDINANCE NO. .._., TO _ LOGAI ION OF PROPERTY ( SIDE OF STREET , STREE r NAME. , DISTANCE FROM NEAREST w INTERSE-.:TING STREET) East tiide of I:3ruu):Iiuret, opposite the intersection of flrookhur9t and Bunhard. LEGAL DESCRIP1ION ! SEPARATE +- EGAL REQUIRED ►OR EACH ZONE REQUESTED ) II INDIC-ATE WHAT PLANS YOU HAVE FOR IMMEUTAT OR GIVE REASONS FOR REQUESTING THIS ZONE CHANGE rhea rapid development of properties in the vicinity- of the :+abject palL- 1-1 inrlicrktt- a a need for commercial development of thr� type, we propoae. The location and size of this property wake :i U -•I, zoning the highest and beet use, It this zoning is grunted, developmLst would proceed within l 'L' to 18 months . i-100L,E PROP .P,TIES, INC. (fox�,nerlv John Poole - Chigltita Co roration) By { SIGNATURE = PRI • rY ;*"JE:R OR AU Ti ORI CD AGENTJ N H. 00Lr:, PRESIDENT THE ATTACHED SUPPLEMIEN : AL Sr:.E't mUS,r BE -E AD AND SI(ME I • BY THE d PPLiCANT kbli4h..J&L12172 __.._ PUBL.IC HEARING SET Pink "ardS to k ............... 41 11. " _:A- 10 i 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING �----- '"" APPEAL TO DENIAL T �.NG IC IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington reach., in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center , Huntington Beach , at the hour of P. M. , or ae soon thereafter as possible , on _.hQnday_..�.._. the frh day of N .�� , r 14 , for the 1mrpose of considering an appen1 th the denial by the City Planning Commission oli:E "one Case No . 72�- 1, for change of tone on approximately a 1 . 72 tic . parcel of lnnd from RA-0 ResidentInI Agricultural Wstrict , combined with oil production , to C4 Highway '�onmierc.inl District, with .a 30 ft . setback from the ultimate right of wny line . The subject property is located on the Past aide of Brookhurst Street , opposite the intersecti,),n of Brookhurst rind Bushard Streets . A lagn l descripti.o" is on file in Office . thePlanr�ingDepartment All interested persons are if.vited to cttand said hearing and express their opinion.. for or against said Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clark. DATED : �0113 IZ2 CITY OF• HUNTINGTON BEACH By : Paul C . Jonas City Clerk City Clerk City of Huntington Beach The Huntington b ch 1a ink; Commis on, at their regular/a4J4*w cad meeting held s 7 , recommended of 2 MW J z If approval has been recommended, the City Council will be required to hold a public hearing on this matter. Although there is at 10 day appeal period, we suggest that the matter be set for the earliest possible City Council meeting, because the purpose of any appeal is to have a hearing before the City Council and this is already being accomplished. We further suggest that you not accept nny appeal , as it, will serve no purpose. If approval has been recommended other than as requested, the City Council will be required to hold a public hearing on this matter. However, there is a possibility that the Planning Commission' s decision Will be appealedl therefore, we suggest that publication be held off until the 10 day appeal period has expired. If denial has been recommended, the City Council may summarily deny the request. However, we suggest that the matter not be scheduled on the City Council agenda until the 10 day appeal period has expired. A copy of the Plarinitig Department legal notice, and a list of owners of property within 300 feet of the subject area will he submitted upon your request. The applicant in this matter is Id. (Address) 0. p� f 4?ua, &too, (Telephone) 220- - ' � Kenneth R. Reynolds , Planning Director By 11AA AA LL i 3 . ZONE CASE No . 72- 31 �-Mettle evelojxnent Corp. John Poole » Chiquita Corp. P.O. Box 2218 Anaheim, Cal , 92804 Location : East side of Broo?khursL SLreet opposite the intersect ioit of HroohhltrsL and Bushard Streets e LC Request : A change of zone on approx imn t e 1 y 1 . 7 2 acre pnrcel of land from RA- 0 Residential Agricultural District comhine'd with oil production to C4 Highway Commercial District; with a 50 f t . setback from the ultimate right-o f-way line . Reasons &Iyan by ,applicant_ z (In Brief) The rapid development of prcpertit s in Lhe vicinity indicates a need for commercial development . The location and size of this property makes C4 zoning the highest and best use . Action: sEc:oNr) .y,�.�'. E."P}oC� &3 4 NOL' . . . �. �N K NOW 1►� b C'1i 1C� rM O'A1T © � p1�Li��R�'� ABSI N 1' .... Pro '`ram N �.�-r� A•w o s.�a rw . APPaovco.... .. TRA�� 1�C.. hrwd Si,,�-1t-t 1� ►"L.A�d3 MNIED. .. .. . ...{ ue. w t% t C. M w o cj 11. b 1kot I N Cu Q C.rb . CONTINUED ................. All , r; AI'�'Irt:':+ i► UrN11 U . CON1101111k -4- 10/3/72 - PC V 2• ZONE CASE NO. 72.30 APR1 !fits Seth 0, & Fart Wilson 16852 Bolen China St . Huntg Bch , Ca t 92649 Locations East of Bolsa Chien Street Approximately ioo fte north of Warmer Avvnue ZC Re.+ uost : A chnn rw o i' zone on rl �rox irn li_e one � gg p� r ! y o .i c re parcel of L from k2 Mod 11m hells I Ly Ros idenL i.Al district. to C4 11i hw+y toff tercinl Dlstrk L with n 50 ft . NPLAinck from t:hv Irlt: imcll. r l• 1ghL -of-wnv 11ntr . Reasons Riven by tlpp t i eam : ( In 11r 1 c f ) To Cleve 1 opmenL n commerc i ri l Cleve 1 opuuCTIL . Action : MnTIUN .141-61"1 -r• "D FVW e . Cr *7 7. 3 sEco!v, T%So.qLr. r �• t0ow-b tNr-2spsc rrNe SURPLUS ar .� c. , : •ht OF C® M M4 . "'its Pe*t1 1 M r1413 All';I Al tI I DLNILD cur,lilNtll.l� O*04r& 't'14A0 62• L 1 tW M ! ar W or. Tw wro •rt4t *4 a,9a 4T 1tu w %M%q . MOTmhl PO �..... t`O 'b l it CC or 'TO PLftC C SU r3 COT a 1R 1�*rim s[corrD Wf!►4Lla N01LAT04ti oK 014 N1italk 1112j 1. -* IAA 4LlOk Oka. . �w�nsR. •� o N 1o�i��I �A �� � to � ta �rti, l�y �s�o«� Al:'d to, b.#R •O�•'f �C. �•1p u +.�c !� 0 M to % it ARS t AN APF'kS.`VW w' DCNIEV �_. {. � � aq' ,� 1i' �•:/ . .Yf'�1i•1;' "'Tv� .1 ., ilc C. is .. •7wT! i � .. � .4'.1j ♦ ��1, \ L •! , I ;+.. �,ii: �� : J, 1 } i.l , �11., ,y►,, '`i .�....t; ��l', 1 �r� r`M►dim RINKER ' c0MP0RAr10M October 12, 1972 The Honorable City Councii Cityof Huntington Beach �s� Civic Center s 3 va 5th Street & Orange Avenue AAC Huntington Beach, California �--� Re: Lote Change Ca,so 72-31 Brookhurst Street (opposite the intersection of Btookhurst & Bushard) +' Gentlemen: At the Planning Commission meeting of October 3, 1972, our application for a zone change was recommended for denial. �. We respectfully appeal the findings of the Planning Commiision and 1 request that the Council set a date for a public hParina to consider o►ir r appeal. I I We believe that the Planning Commission findings were erruncous and we propose to prement additional facts to the City Council to justify the � proposed change of' tone. t: Enclosed is our check in the amount of $75 . Respectfully scibaiitted, Warren C. Lefebvre Vice Premide+nt jls Enclosure ASON11 it 64ker • PO 13ox ?4110 • Newporl Beach. California 9266; 7elephune (7M) 979.7200 Porr,%r,1 :+.1r1 l•r(Jrv•I— NI- r,71 +UdCh :Rn PIfl �! 40 iry {r I 1 r � irMITI1tiTjN 4Ct4.Gar RIN�ER Ortobar 12, 1972 The tlouorabld City Council A City cf Huntington Beach ��_�,/�, 0,6 .4s� ,s Civic Center '3th Street Ir Orange Avenue lfuntingion Beach, CaUfornin L--� Re: Zow Change Case 72-31 Brookhutrat 9treot (opposite the intersection al' Brookhurst & Bushard) Gentlemen: -At the Planning Cotxt'isaiou meeting of October 3, 1972, our application fox a none change, was recommended for denial. i We respectfully appeal the findings of the Planning Commission and regaast that the Council s6t a date for t public hearing to considar our appeal. We believe that the, Planning Commissinn findings were orronenus and we propose to presetat additional facts to the City Council to justify the proposed change o1, stone. Enclosed is our check in the amount of $75. Respectfully subnUttedr *r�rin C. Lefebvre Vice President Enclosure Aesnlll at faker • PQBox 2410 ' Newport peach, California 92063 telephone (714) 919•7 r Portland San Francisco Newport 8eecii "All DI0Q0 f • Huntington Beach Planning Commission g P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA t2646 TO: Honorable: Mayor and City Council FROM, Planning Commission DATE: October 13, 1972 SUBJECT: ZONE CASE NO. 72-31 - APPEAL A request for change of zone on a 1 . 72 acre parcel (500 ' x 1501 ) from RA-0 Residential Agricultural District cmbined with oil production to C4 Highway Co=pArcial District with a 50 ft . setback from the ultinwite right of way line . The applicant' wants to develop the property into a coamercial project. Location: Applicant: East of Brookhurst Street Rinker Development Corp. opposite the intersection John Poole - Chiquita Corp. of Brookhurpt and Bushard Y .O. Box 2218 Streets . Anaheim, California Planning YiiCoiesion Action: DENULL -� October 1 , 1972 Yistia�m for the following reasonsi 1 . This zone change , iF approved , would create spot zoning . t 2 . The detergaination on how the property to the north and south of subject property will develop is unknown, 3. A cou arrcial use would create traffic: and safety hs.zards . i' Vote: AYES : Bazil , Kerins , Porter , Wallin, b3yle, Higgins . NOES : hone ABSENT: Slates Comissioners Comments: Comissionsr Kerins stated that: this property had been reviewed by the Comisoxon in 1971 and it was determined that it was not a feasible coamrcial site and had been zoned RA pending a determination of what would be a fe4sible use . Cosmissio,ner Wallin suggested consideration b3 given ':o soar type of � recreational use , , Zone Case No. 72- 31 October 13 , 1972 Page 2 _Additional Information: Mr. Warren Fefilovre , representing Rinker Development Corp . , spoke in favor, Mrs. William Poage , resident in the area , stated that this is one of the first areas seen upon entering the city from Pacific Coast- Highway , it should be considered in a special light , the area is already over-co=nercialized and she suggested , - , in view of its proximity to the Santa Ana River recreational trail , that the property be reserved for a park or rest area . Sumary of Staff Report : The property was zoned from C4 to RA in 1971 as a part of Master Plan Amendment No . 71-2 , amending Study Area "A" . The property is undesigneted on the amended master plan, because of its unique shape , si^t: and location. Ultimate size of the property is 130 ft. x 500 f t . It is surrounded on the north and east. by the Orange County Sanitation Plant . Tl ,- balance of this parcel ( . 8 acre) a.nd an additional . 5 acre parcel to the south, also owned by the applicant, were not included in this zone change . The Commission indicated a desire to see a plan prior to approving zoning at the time Master Plan Amendment No. 71-2 was adopted . Supporting Information Submitted Herewith : 1 . Staff Report 2 . Area ?15ap 3 . Petition for Change of Zone Information to be Submitted at the Public Hearin : 1 . du Graphs 2 . Slides 3. Staff Comments Respectfull uulbmitted , K.A. Reynol a , Secretary KAR.,1h a t tchs . i r STAFF REPORT 'Lone Case No. 72.31 Applicant: Rinker Development: Corp John Poole-Chiquita Corp . Date : October 3 , 1972 The staff has reveiwed Zone rase No . 72-31 and offers the following information for your consideration: 1 . This application is a request to rezone 1 . ')2 acres of land from RA-0 Residential Agricultural District combined with o.l•1 to C4 Highway Commercial District . The property is located on the east side of Drookhurst Street at the Lnt ersection of Brookhurst and Bushard Streets . 2 . A map showing the surrounding area and land use is attached for your review. 3 . The property was zoned from C4 to RA in 1973. aF a part of Master Plan Amendment No . 71-2 amending Study Area "A" . The proper. t:y is shown as "undesignated" on the amended master l,lan. This indication was given to the property because of its unique shape , size and j location . The ultLrzt-e size of subject property will be 130 ft. x 500 ft. It is surrounded on the north and east by the Grange County Sanitation. Treatment Plant . 4. The balance of this parse 1 ( . 8 acre) and an ad-d it ions 1 . 5 acre j parcel to the south are also owned by the applicant and zoned RA. Proposed use of all of. the RA zoned parcels (as shown on the attached map) should be discussed priov to approving a change of zone . 5 . A zone change to C4 Highway Commercial District was recently approved by the City Council for a service station on the northwest corner of Brookhurst and Bushard Streets directly across the street from the subject parcel . 6 . 1n d isCU98 ing the C:4 to RA zone change on subject property in 1971 , the Commission indicated a desire to see o pine prior to approving a zone change . The applicant has submitted a plan which is included herewith. 7 . rrafifte circulation on subject property can be improved upon. This can be accomplished at the Board of Zoning Adjustments through the Administrative Review procedure. I i J ZC 72- 31 Page 2 f B . A Master Plan Amendment rust be approved prior to the approval of this zone case . The Commission should address itself to the type of commercial uses proposed by the applicant and the use of adjacent RA zoned property at the October 3rd meeting. r i Ihubllshed Muntinpton Ooech Nawri Oct. IV, foil. f NOTICK Of PUBLIC ►IRAIIINif A"VAL " RVIIAL It"t CASK No. NOTICE IS HLrREEY GIVEN thst a pub- lie honrint will be hold by tit* City Council of the City of Huntington /oech. In ftr Council Chaftel of the Civic Cen`s►, HuntNMton ItW.h, at the hour of 7100 P.M., or,ea win tt sm~ as possible, on Monday, ift lath day of Novander, 10% for the purva" of eon• oldorinal an ,appeal to tlN denial by Ow City PlannlnR Commisshm of Zone Case No._7*71, for chan,e *('-sort* on (item RA-0slRotldentlel Agricultfural Cie tekt, t:ormbined with oil INWIctton, to W Highway Commercial Oistri:t. with a on n. petbeek Morn the Wtirnete right of way line. The subject property Is wcatad on the coat side of trooknurst Stnr*' opp"Ite the intenoetioll of tl►w%hurst and tfushard Wrests. A legal d"arlotlon Is on file In the Planning Department Office. All Interested po na arm Invited to atWA sold hewing and a:prows their "Inichs for or against said;appeel. Further InformMion rosy be obtained tnom the Office of the City Clem«. t)ATEDt 10113172. CITY Of, HUNTINOTON IWAC11 s Paul C. Jones arty Ckfk i V Published HuntlgWn Beech Ntws Sep* • 21, 197Z. LKIAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CANT NO. 72•31 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a pub- Ile hearing will be hold by the City Planning Commission of the City of Hunt. InCton Beach for the purpose of con- sidering a Change of zone on approxl• mately a 1.71 ae, parcel of land from RA-0 Residential Agricultural District combined with all production to C4 Highway Commercial District with ■ 50 It. setback from the ultimate rlght of way line. The subject property is located on the east side of Brockhurst Street, opposite the Intersection of Brookhurit and Bushord Straits. A legal description Is on Ilia In the Planning Department Office. Said hearing will be hold at the hour of 100 P.M., on October 3, 1972. In the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Peach, California, on Sth Street between Main Street and Orange Avenue. Ali Interested perwns are Invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed CHANGE OF ZONE. Further Information may be obtained from the City Planning Department, Telephone No. !36.5271 DATED this 21st day of September,1972. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION K. A. Reynolds Baretary 0 • —3/ 13 --- --? RCCfi:I Vfi:D �7 Ire JUN 13 1911 MAWM wr. RINKER O M P A N Y .Tune 12, 1973 City of Huntington Beach P. O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92048 Attn: Tom Soverns, Director Environmental Resources Re; ED 73- 13 Brookhurst Street at Bushard Street Gentlemen: Pursuant to our request, I have submitted he rewith a further Y 9 explanation for the questions on your Exemption Declaration form, Nos. 7. a, 7. b, 21 and 22. Should these explanations appear Insufficient, please advise by phone and I will attempt to elaborate or clarify further. One point that should probably be considered by your Honorable Council is the fact that subject property has a deed restriction placed on it many years ago by the Sanitary District prohibiting the use of the property for residential purposes. It was with this restriction in mind that we initiated 0117 request for neighborhood commercial use. Sincerely, 000 Ma ry S. R in r HSR;mes Attach. Redhtll at Baker - PO. Box 2460 Newport Beach, California 9206:1 - taloplrnne (714) 979.7200 A Division of W. H. Grace Land Corporation ' V ADDITIONAL, EXPLANATION OF EXEMPTION DECLARATION APPLICATION: 7. a To what extent, If any, will the project disrupt or divide an established community or an orderly, planned development? Subject property is bound on the East and North by the sewer treatment plant property and on the South by a similarly shaped property presently undeveloped. To the West, across arookhurst, is a small commercial and office building complex that appears to be suitable for neighborhood use. Said complex is surrounded by single family housing. It would not appear that subject requested zoning would adversely disrupt or divide the established community. 7. b Is the project Inconsistent with plans that have been adopted by the corninunity In which the project is located? It would appear that since: the property Is deed restricted by the Sanitary District against residential use, that the proposed commercial use would be the most consistent application for the property. o project r:l . To what extent, if any, will the pr pvs .c cl pr fie, t affect basic governmental services (inc:Juding but not Jimited to, police, fire, sewers, schools, roads ) and the present and future: ability of government to provide such services ? The commercial development of the prupc! rty will increase city services :slightly for police, fire, and sowers. Schools would be unaffected and it w cxild be my opinion that roads would also be unaffected because traffic going to th.ib center would be traffic that would not need to drive to another center, perhaps a further distance from the residents than our proposed development. 22. Are there any feasible and less environmentally offensive alternatives to this project? The development, as proposed in oiir opinion is the least environmentally offensive of any development. 1 Page 014 - Council Minutes - 3/5/73 The Mayor asked if the City Attorney would be prepared in the near future to advise Council as to the legal capacity of Council to enact legislation in line with Mrs . May's recommendations, and the City Attorney stated that his office has been conducting re- search on this matter and a City Attorney Opinion is now being prepared. No action was taken on the matter by Council. COX , S F&W COUNCIL ItWRT�-F.XECUTjNL BOARD OF THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Councilwoman Gibbs reported that at the last **sting of the Executive Board of the Sani- tation District the Board took no action on acquiring this property owned by Rinker De- velopment Company adjacent to the Sanitation Planet because the City was able to control the use of the property through Boning, however, the District would reconsider the matter if the situation changed, UNDRIWIPt1� UT ING Of ILfTY POW BOLGA CHIU STATE BEACH _ . _ Councilwoman Gibbs inquired if a letter had been directed to the State regarding the undergrounding of the utility poles on Bolsa Chico State Beach. The City Administrator addressed Council regarding the undergrounding of the poles and Mayor Coen stated that this matter had previously been discussed and that Council had given the City' s legal department instruction regarding the matter. USi OF FUNDS DERIVED F 3 OF SURPLUS PROPERTY _.,� . i�OM ACE-.,-- ----- --- - A motion was made by Mayor Coen to direct the City Administrator to mks recommendations to Gioncil regarding the earmarking of monies derived from the sale of surplus property to be used for the acquisition of other properties or for other purposes, rather than to the general fund . The motion was passed by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: Shipley, Bartlett , Gibbs, Green, Hatney, Duke, Coen NOBS: Councilmen: None ABSENT: Councilmen: None RE33Oh TrION TO BE PREPARED - SUPPORTING STATE IAMRy FOR EDUCATION A motion was trade by Mayor Coen to direct the City Attorney to prepare a resolution supporting a State lottery for the purpose of earmarking the funds for education. Councilman Duke and Councilwoman Gibbs requested and were granted permiesion to abstain from voting on the matter. The notion was passed by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen: Shipley, Bartlett , Green, Matney, Coen HOES : Councilmen: None ABSTAIN:Counci lteen: Gibbs , Duke ABSENT: Councilmen: None xB$lb 0.! DUIlaING PERMITS DURING. Mayor Coen spoke regarding the need for an ordinance Amndment to prohibit the issu- ance of building permits duxing appeal periods. Page #5 - Council Minutes - 11/6/72 pLaLIC UMNG - ZgK CASE Na 7 - - MMT EM RMINg - JJU 0 W IIA •_ U219VO Mayor Coon announced that this was the day and hour set for a public sons change hearing pt;rsuant to a request filed by Both 0. and genre L. Wileml following denial by the Plaaaing Cowsiasion of Zone Case No. 72-30 for a change of son* on a 1.10 acre parcel (300' x 1321 ) , from RZ Medium Density Residential District to C4 Highway Commercial District with a 50 foot setback from the ultimate right of way lieu«. The Clerk informed Council that all legal requirements for; ratification, publication and posting had been meet , and that he had received no commvunications or written protests to Zone Case No . 72-30, or to the recoe■arendation of denial by the Planning Comaiesion. The Plaoaing Director presented a resume' of the Planning Ccrosission' s reasons for recommending denial of Zone Case No. 72-30. Mayor Corn declared the hearing open. Mr. Seth-O. Wilson, applicant, 16582 Dolsa Chica Street, City, addressed Council and presented reasons supporting his request for a change of sores, and discussion was held betwesu Mr. Wilson and Council on the matter. Mr. Robert Butts, 17171 Roundhill Drive, City, prospective buyer, addressed Council and stated the reasons why he believed the son* change request should be approved. Them being no one further present to speak on the matter and there being no protests filed either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor. Following discussion, on motion by Green, Council overruled the Planning Commission; approved Zone Case No. 72-30 and directed the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance effecting the change of stone . The motion was passed by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen: Shipley, Bartlett, Gibbs, Green, Coen NOES: Councilmen: Matney, Duke ABSENT: Councilmen: None POLIC IN(: - ZONE CASS NO,, Z2-31 - ROUEST FOR NMIN R.IMR C_0111f. 2W_IN i� Mayer Coon announced that this was the day and hour set for a public zone change hameing pursuant to a request filed by Rinker Corporation following denial by the Planning Commission of Zone Case No. 72-31, for a change of sons on approximately a 1.72 acre parcel of land from RA-0 Residential Agricultural District, combined with oil.-production, to C4 Highv.,Ay Commercial District, with a 50 foot setback fromt the ultimate right of way line on property located on the east aid* of Brookharat Street, opposite the intersection of Brookhurst and Dushard Streets. The Planning Director presented a resume' of the Planning Cossmission's reasons for recommending denial of Zone Case No. 72-3f. Mayor Coen declared the hearing open. Mr. Warren Lefebra, Costa Mess, representing the owner of the property, addressed I Council and presented reasons Why comarcial zoning on this property was more desir- able than residential or industrial soning. jpags #6 - C tm ail Minutes - 11/6/72 Mrs. Grace Poage, 9052 Christine drive, City, addressed Council aad stated that she believ" that the property should not be zoned for coamiercial use. i Thera being no one further present to speak on the matter and there being no further protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor. On moticm by Green, Council directed that a decision on Zone Case No. 72-41 bt deferred to the December Ids 1972 Comai1 treating, and in the s:eantim the representatives of Sanitation District 911 will consult with the Sanitation Board. The motion was passed by the following vote: AYES: Councilman: Shipley, Bartlett, Gibbs, Green, Matney, Duke, Coen NolS: Councilmen: Mona AURNT: Ct'MIneilmen: Hone yUJILtC ._„I>t . ,:.._MASTER PW AMENDMENT NO, 72,6 �V-P"IOVED - RES ,, MOB 35,91 - AMPTF Mayor Coon announced that this was the day ai:d hour set for a public hearing on Master Plan Amendment No. 72-6 - an Interim Open Space Plan which is an element of the Master Plan. ThLs interim plan recis nds goals and general policies for preservation of open space in Huntington Beach. The Clark Informed Council that all legal requirements for publication and posting had boom tat, and that he had reiMeived no coamnicarions or written protests to Master plan Amendment No. 72-6 or to the recommendation of approval by the Planning Commission. The Planning Director presented a resume' of the Planning Commission's reasons for recoeeesnding approval of Master Plan Amendment No. 72-6. Mayor Coon declared the hearing open. There being no one present to speak on the matter and there being no protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor. on notion by Gibbs, Council approved Master Plan Amendment No. 72-6 by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: Shipley, Bartlett , Gibbs, Green, Matney, Duke, Coen POPS: Councilmen: None ASSENT: Councilman: None The Clark was directed to read Resolution No. 3591 by title - "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COtMCIL OF THE CITY OF HUN'TMTON BEACH AMENDING ITS MASTER PLAN OF LAND USE TO INCLUDE MASTER PLAN AMENDHENr NO. 72-6 - INTERIM OPEN SPACE PLAN ." On motion by Green, Council waived further reading of Resolution No. 3591 and adopted same by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen: Shipley, S artlett , Gibbs, Green, Matncy, nuke , Coen NOBS : Councilmen: None ABSENT: Counc i lmop: None PITShIC RMINC .-rCODE AMGNT NOS . 72-12 & 72-20 - APPROVED rarNUerME Mayor Coen announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing hearing on Code Amendment No. 72-12 and Code Amendment No. 72-20 - initiated by the Planning Com- mission. The Code Amendments propose the following: Affidavit of %FbIlication_ _.••-' �.► ► ' �„1,/ aty of Huntington ?Beach George Farquhar, being duly sworn or: oath, says: That he a ••' citizen of the United States, over the age of twenty-one years, �,�•• .• - That he Is ttM printer and publisher of the Huntington Bea tf "• %�•�� News, a weekly newspaper of general circulation ptnted sing pu •,,•..'•• "•.. liaahed in I3untittgton Beach, California and clrculnted in the gala County of Orange and elsewhere and published for the clittsemination �- of local and other news of a general character. and has it bona fide subscription list of paying subscriL•ern, and said paper has been established, printed turd published in the State of Cailfornln, and County of Orange, for at least one year tiext beforo the publication of the first Insertion of this notice; and the said newspaper (s not devoted to the Interest of, or publlsh d for the entertainment of any particular class, profession, trude, calling, race or denomination, or any number thereof. The Huntington Beach New was ndjudleated a legal newslaaper of general circulation by Jt!dge G. K. Scovel In the 8uperlor Court dim of OrangeGbunty, Callbt•aln August 27th, 1937 by order No, A-5931. That the CA$E _ .__�_._� ' • ' '. IN• 1 �•• , i aM M' i of which the annexed Is a printed copy, was published in said news- paper at least ong ��.�.�4 , d�! b aa c�aarunen from the — l��e�.. day of ..�_�._...�.,._._ wit Y 19.,72L_, and ending on the _11t hlay of Oo t obe r rl ; 19-.._.._., both days inclusive, and as often during said period and M on times of publication as said paper was regularly iciued, and In the 4AA1. regular and entire Issue of said pewspaper proper, and not in a , AM . supplement, and said notice was published therein on the followinE; dates, to-wit: taMrieq ' ubl I s heher Subscribed and sworn to before me thla Uh._._. day of October 192-2— �.._ Notary Public Orange Cotvtty, California THOMAS D. WYLLIE Notary Publie•Callivrnie Orange County Mr Cemmiitieh E:alres Soplornbar 12, 1974 RECEIVED • 7�r Ct EnK c OF car t ,� • CALIF. �r � � ✓_ _ 37) OCT S PH i14 %a_, Z& / ..,mowoht.�n • A;z �, ,, t t� � . ., �' --�-- . . _. .. 4�,:.�.�1 . -- .� � .. __ ..-- . .�'c.. _..cam ...a-c.c�J ..1...� (�.+ __--- . .-- .ate - _ .. ,.. _..__ �__ . . � _ . . r Published Huntington !leach News Oct. 12, 1272. NOTIMft Of P1IOLIC NRARINB APMAfr TO DENIAL ROME CASE 7248 NOTICE Ig HEREBY GIVEN that ■ pub- lic heparin` will be hold by the: City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, In the Council Chember of the Civic Center, Muntinfiton Beach, at the hour of 7r00 P.M.. 'or as loon t wrWter me posaltrle, on Monday the ith day of November, 1972, for the purpose of con- sidering an appeal to the denial by the My Planning Commission of Zone Case No. 72.30, for chant* of two on approxl- mately a •1 Mare parcel of land from R2 Medlum Density ResidenflW District, with a 50 ft. setback from the ultimate right of way line. The subject property le la Bated sail of Balm Chica street, ap- proximately 500 feet north of Warner Avenue. A Isiol description is on file In the Planning Dsps-tm*nt Office. : All Interested persons' are invit*d to attend cold hwring and express their opinions for or agslnst said Zme Can. Further Information may be obfsined from the Office of the City Clerk. DATED 10/6/72 CITY OF MUNTINGTON BAH By, Paul C. Jones City Clerk CITY OF HunTinaon BEA(H ,/, / fit P.O. BOX 190, CALIFORNIA 92648 PLANNING DEPT. (714) 536-5271 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Planning Commission DATE: October 11 , 1972 SUBJECT: ZONE CASE NO. 72-30 - APPEAL A request for changge of zone on a 1 . 10 acre p�:rcel (300 ' X 1321 ) from R2 Medium Density Residential District to C4 Highway Commercial District with a 50 ft . setback from the ultimate right of way line . The applicant wants to develop the property into a commercial project. Location: A22licant : East of Bolsa Chica Street Seth 0, & Emma V ilson approximately 500 ft . north 16852 Bolsa Chica Street of Warner Avenue . Huntington Beech, Calif. Planning Commission Action: DENIAL - October 39 1972 f�- " '�` r for the following reasons : 1 . This request , if approved , would increase the surplus of commercial property in the immediate area . 2 . Additional commercial zoning northerly along Bolsa Chica would tend to create strip commercial zoning. Vote : AYES: Wallin, Boyle , Porter, Higgins , Kerins , Bazil NOES: None ABSENT: Slates f Commissioners Comments : It was the consensus of the Commission too study this area for uses other than R2 , in view of the relationshipand proximity of the property to the airport runway . The Planning Commission discussed recommending a moratorium on development in the airport vicinity, pending results of the current study being performed by the City and County, It was then decided to discuss the subject .further at their. October 10, 1972 study session. Additional Information: Mr . Seth Wilson, applicant , mke in mmwnw� favor. Mr. Robert Butts , 17 Round- hill Drive, Huntington Beach, also spoke in favor of the proposal . There was no one present to speak in opposition. � r9 • Zone Case No. 72- 30 October il, 1972 Page 2 S„s r of Staff Report : There are existing vacant iu•�nediate area and any additions.;[ commercconrnercial ial zoning in the Of Warner on Bolsa Chica would create strip commercialr2oninY 8• Supporting Information Submitted Herewith: 1 . °staff Report 2 . Area Map 3 . Petition for Change of Zone Reapeatfull submitted , / _ K. A. Rey-no dsf Secretary KAR:bwo attacks , ##V.....T.. ..._ _....._._....__... _..._.. ......._.._._..__ _-_ .. f ublishad Huntington Beach News .uly 20, 1972. LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC WEARING 10149 CA5r, NO. 79-23 NOTICE 19 HEREBY ONFUS that a Pub- fie hearing will be held by the City Planning Commission of the CRY of Hunt• i Ington Gooch for the pur;wse M can, sidering a change of zone on ap'3rwil- i mately one (1) acre of land from RoA-O Restdentlal Agricultural combined with all to M1 Light Industrial District. The subject property Is located wait of Crystal Street approximately E75 feet south of Garfield Avenue. A Ideal de- scription Is on file In the Planning De- partment Office. Said hearing will be held at this hour ; of 1100 P.M., on August 1, 1972, In t4% Council Chanthrr of the Civic Center, Huntington each. Calitornla, on Sth r Street between Main Street and Orange Avenue. All Interested persons are Invited to attend sold hearing and express their opinions for or egalrst the proposed i CHANGE OF ZONE. Further Information may be obtadned from the City Planning Dopartment. Telephone No. M5271 DATED this 20th day of July, 1972. r CITY PLANNING COMMISSION Vy K. A. Reynolds Secretary l .� STAFF REPORT Zone Case No. 72-30 Applicant : Mr. & Mrs . Seth 0. Wilson Date : October 3 , 1972 The staff has reviewed Zone Case No . 72-30 and offers the following information for your consideration: 1 . This request has been filed to rezone approximately one acre of property from R2 Medium Density Residential to C4 Highway Commercial with a 50 ft . setback. Subject property is located on the east side of Bolss C.hica Street approximntely 500 ft . north of Warner Avenue . 2 . The applicant has stated In his request Lhat there rare no immediate plans for development of Lhe property ; however , the property Is In escrow with a stipulation that the zoning be changed to C4 Highway Commercial District . 3 . This was included in recent studies of the Master property Plan at which time the Planning Commission initiated a rezoning on subject property from an Rl to R2 by Zone Case No . 71-20 Area "G" . 4. Attached herewith is a ma)) showing surrounding zoning . 5 . It should be noted that there are existing vacant commercial properties in the immediate area and that any additional commercial zoning northerly n Long Bo 1 sn Chira would tend to create str i.p commer+ci.A 1 zoning. In view of the nbove inf.ormnt:ion , the staff recot"Mends doninl. or Zone Cnsv No . 72- 10 ns thc. nppl lcnnt: lads not cuff is i.ent: ly I tviL I f I (-d n dviii lid fo r nny acid 1 L I ona 1 connvrc I a I p rape rtv In the ar.erg. IIIllllllr fll IIIr1111 11111 rrirtlr Ir1 IIIM11111!lllrr Illrlrlr �� 11lMlillrl Irbil/�1111 11111.11 1 111 111 M1111M1still 111/1111 11 111 1111011111111111111 111111f1r lrlIM ll 111r1 �1MIr111111M!!11 1111rrllrlllr �1�1 11 IIIIIr111111/1111 IIIIIr111111N1111 11 � I���AI111�1111rtI1i11 i11�1�111111i11�1111� r1!l1111M1111r1r�r11 Ilrllrll11�1MM1111M1 11111rIMii111ii11:i 1111011111 1 1 M11MIM1 11l11111#Ilrllllllll 1111 11 11r11111r1111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIillllll loll or�111rr1r1111111 w w r � w ,\WRN ZONE CASE 72-30 ` M 1 � • y • CHANCE OF ZONE ... FILING FEE 015022 Al1G Z 1972s — Z»C. � CITY OF HUNTINGTON KA .' NING DEPT. � 1�G �4l �a� P. O. I DAIT B FILED -.� '�?'�- Mr_A Rrs. E L. I Seth MII.SoM COMMITOXION ACT*N DAY PROP[RT Y O*W* C3 APPROVED N ME Cr3 COMTKNALLY APPAOWED AUTHORIZED AGENT © DENIED � C] WITHDRAWN 160i2 Bolsa Chico Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92649 APPEALED E3 YES Co No MAILING ADQRESS w COUNCIL ACTION DATE -3220 (_`] SUSTAINED CGMMISSION PHONE NO. APMWED WITH CCNOtTK M3 OTHER THAN C0% MtS 01_Mr Z DENIED PEYITIONED PROPERTY TO BE RV ZONED g ED WITHDRAWN FROM EFFECTIVE DATE TO C4 ORDINANCE NO. LOCATION OF ( SIDE OF '+TREET NE , STREET NAME i DISTANCE FROM AitKST P. INTERSECTIM STREET) On side of Bolsa Chi ca !street, approximately SW I = of Werner Avenue, Huntington Beach LEGAL DESCRIPTION ( SEPARATE ;_EEGAL REQUIREO FOR EACH ZONE REQUESTED The south 1321 of Lot 1 , Block 5, Tract 666 recorded in Book 10, pages 35 and 36 of Misc"llaneous, Maps recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of Orange County. i I INDICATE WHAT PLANS YOU HAVE FOR IMME011ATF'. DEVELOPMENT OR GIVE REASONS FOR REQUESTING tHIS ZONE CHANGE. Property is in escrow and one of the conditions of the sale is that the same be rezoned from RZ to C4. The purchaser intends to improve t;he property in the near future with soars form m of co rcial development, the exact nature of which has not been decided upon by the pur- chaser, but the purchaser will conclude the purchase if the property is zoned C4 subject of course to the necessity for his procuring a building permit for whatever comorcial develop- ment he determines to place upon the property. 4SIGATUR DROP Rr CAW yER OR AUTMORIZED AGENT PROP THE ATTACHED A A L.ICART ' T T SUPPLEMEN AL Sr:.. �.r INUlgT CIE E An AND IO r: , BY THE A PP S N_1 t ' Publish 10/12/72 Pink Ca rds tock ,hBLIC HEARING SET Xft1kAmXift R FOR:........ ��'., ! " «............. 4A ma A _ .....�r• .. NOTICE OF Fi1'IlLIC ICING APPEAL TO DZK" t, MMOMMMOUnJ Z4 CAgZ 72��11 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be halal by the City Council of the City ,of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7 s 00 P. M. , or as soon thereafter at passible, on MBd AX the 6th day of November , 1.9 72, for the purpose of considering ;f an appeal, to the denial by the City Planning Cvseaission of 'Lone Case No. 72-30, for change of rune on approximately a 1 acre parcel of laud from R2 Medium Density presidential District, with a 50 ft. setback from the ultimate right of May line. The subject property is Located least of Bolas Chics Street, approximately 500 feet north of Warner Avenue. A legal description is on file in the Planning Department Office. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said Z__ons, Cag,�,:,�,�,,,. Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk. DATED: 10/6172 CITY OF. I1M'IN=N SUCH By: Pau 1 C. Jotwe City Clara Published Huntington Beach Nowt 21, 1972. LEGAL NOTICR NOTiCK OF FUNLIC Mt{ARING XON[ CASK NO. 71.7E NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a pub- lic hearing will be held by the City Pen- ning Commission of the City of Huntlnfd• ton beach for the purpose of consider- ing a Change of Zone on approximately a i acre parcel Of land from R2 Medium Density Residential District to C4 High. way Commercial district with a 50 ft. setback from the ultimate right of way line. The subject property is located east of Solsa Chico Street. approximately 500 feet north of Warner Avenue. A legal description is on file in the Planning Department Office. Said hearing will be held at the hour of 7,00 P.M., on October 3, 1972, In the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, California, on Sth Street between Main Street and Orange Avenue. All Interested per-tons are Invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed CHANGE OF ZONE. Further Information may be obtained from the City Planning Department. Telephone No. 536•5211. DATED this list day of September, 1972. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION By K. A. Reynolds Secretary City Clerk City of Huntington Beach The Huntington sac Planing Comaissioo, at their regular/Wismamed meeting held recommended 'M of ALL .. 17 . If approval has been recommended, the City Council will be required to hold a public hearing on this matter. Although there is a 10 day appeal period, we suggest that the matter be set for the earliest possible City Council meeting, because the purpose of any appeal is to have a hearing before the City Council and this is already being accomplished. We further suggest that you not accept any appeals as it will serve no purpose. If approval has been recommended other than as requested, the City Council will be required to hold a public hearing on this matter. However# there is a possibility that the planning Commission's decision will be appealed; therefore, we suggest that publication be held off until the 10 day appeal period has expired. If denial has been recommended, the City Council may summarily leny the request. However, we suggest that the matter not be scheduled on the City Council agenda until the 10 day appeal period has expired. A copy of the Planning Department legal notice, and a list of owners of property within 300 feet of the subject area will be submitted upon your request. The applicant in this matter is -90. (Address) _ Z& 9 &LLMAL (Telephone) •- Kenneth R. Reynolds, Planning Director By r 2 . ZONE CASE NO. 72-30 AiD, 0. & .Eami Wilson 16852 Bol.sa Chica St . Nutt$ Bch, Cal 92649 Location : East of Bolsa Chic& Street approximately 500 ft. north of Warner Avenue ZC Request : A chapge o f. zone. on rinprux I Min t o 1 v one :Ic re parcel - " of lftnd from R2 Meditun Densl.Ly Ke' Nidentlal nistrict. to C4 Ni hwoy Commerciril Dist- rlLL with a 50 ft. ;setback rum the ultimnLo right, -of-wnV 1 itir . kea snni given by apR 1 1 caret- : ( in (fir i t,f) 'ro development: a commerc in 1 deve lopincnt. . Action: MOTION,. /J11.3 SECT)Nr.'. 11'lsat►a 3L i Ay: � f • wolf -b IINCCI'COSE T14C S01tP'LVS . ' oo: CoMNlL . PaePrItTV tP4 r14113 Ali. r,ur, CONTINUM. Ot04VlL "AM a• 2. IN v 1 rw or 'T'N ILNo IRT Ito N Mr*604 . MovoN Z`O V1 11t re Y PL.hC 1r 50 0-J CC. r O sEco,fln Wlr►i4! N01AT4910M1 SO "cM P. �111l►M - Nit rl L - S t,.i1R 01141c Am Poll 1PG%$1d4a W4hainrrT ILo1L MV1PjT00& 1uwA 7-0 b A V s t r r= . l� •� orb Q%'t%k r.��l t` 1 O` % f AUSI AIN AI'I'h�VCU �/ DL'NIEU - 1- I11/1/ 72 - PC 1 1 2. ZONE CASE ZNO. 72-30 A 0. & lwaal.a Wilson M52 Bolma Chica St . Huntgg Bch Cal 92649 Location: East of Bolsa Chica Street approximately 500 f t . tart-h of Warner Avenue ZC Retest : A chnn4e oC zone on appl-oximrltncli's One acre parcel ' of land from R2 Meditun Doll tLy Residential district. Lo C4 Highway Commer%; Ia l D19t I-1,LL with n 50 ft . setback from the u1tlm Ur right^-or-wnv I tnc . Reasons Riven b a 1 i. L � r t, 8 pp ct�n ( In (1 1 t ) 'lb deve 1 opmenL n commercial deve lop livIlL . Action : MOTION . ID EW C. y . Z f 1 1 woUID mItit"sc rtHa S URPiu & 04 &4 &, . a IPA T 141$ �a,�.i r�• S4•AY�S A � CO � ��y �ItCsh AF'1'1t�-Yi t) bT 1%X A � It DLNILa N � v y cor+ilNueo. orga! ToAN Q• L 1 m V 1 4ru) MOTION..��. ...... D O R€C `T 1* TO QL.IjCGr $Ue'3C6T OFL 'ICIK ' smotln WA&,j.!. NbAhT&jLj0V4 4P N Ae1tN eAMIMtA M lilc 1 1.7:,AD&&^ SO IC Ire_ ((0 v�wa�s e N Jkarmf)h Pam 10. 110 C 3104 FOIL pG%3 t b Le AVO v m s-T Po it bt tb'O N rp f! l is w1 TAD ' Au iI 141 4bLWM TUtwS "1'11" TO C.%Ty ca V "e #... 0 N 1 Ol % 60 AUS I AIN A111':40VUL) DCNIEV CON TINUC U. s• ! t�/ 1�71 Pc,