Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Zone Change Cases - 1973-1975 - ZC 73-5, Paul Dispalatro - Z
1 Affladavit of PL#ficatian 1� state yf California >, County of Oranf;e City of Huntington wactj C"rge Farquhar. boing J,zly sworn on owls, says; That he Ilt a citizen of the United Sustes, over 'he ago at twenty-one yeiirs, ��•v V �•�' 7tat he is the printer and publlllier el the Huntington Beach r�tJ � �' •..�' News, a weekly newspalKir of general circulation printed a►id pub- .�• iiah.d in Huntington Ocach, California aml circulated Ili the aald ..✓��, County of Oranb►'i and eirewhete rind pubiished for the dissemination ,,..•••''l:�C of locrl and other news of a ge:;eral character, avid has a bona fide �• •• ram' *ubscrlptian list of puying suiiscribet-s, anti sold paper has lxvri �• �� e3;41blit:hM, printed and published In the State of Calllornin, and Calinty of Orange, for at least one year nett bertire the publication �� 1 of the first insertion of this notice: anti the said newsRaper is riot devoted to the interest of, or pu►Eshed for :he entertainment of any i particular class, ,-rofession, +radn, enlling, Taco or denominatio:l, or any number ''.ereof. , The Huntington Beach. Ncw was ndjudl_,ttcd a legal newspaper of puneral circulation by Judie G. K. Sceivel in the Superior Court os Orang(t County, California August Vth, 1937 by ortler No. A-5931 _ (Published Huntir,419r1 It`sth t,irs Mry That tile _ _Z111LE. C a , NQ 2 3_..5 . �.� ._ 21, 1173) MOTI14.A1, PUf1.10 "MAWS . ions Cass he. It-$ NOTICE'iS HEREBY GIVEN thk s p0p. l. of which al the ined Is a printed copy, was pu6-:1shed in said newt- tic hetrin4 will on rd ttr ;ttta Cl'h c�ouncn of the City a �wntln�,-.on awn, In the Council Chi of k the. Civic Csnte,r, Huritingtoo slash, a1'.1%. hocsr paper at least One 1 o 9 i 1 P, _ �M, ct 7.09 P.M., ar Of soon thxrslter aft, pweibl& On IK.lnda'y the 4th ray of 197), ,:,or the purposs : of xW dKApw�Ir\u�E t�rtunencing from the ?4 h . day or petition few " � =M ( on land f ia0 Aatidantial Diskkt b Its, offict��lttfM�- 19.,3_._, and ending on the 24111 day Of _ � � _-_-.- tiornnt Distrust. Triet mailxt p►omwy'la leoated an the writ ai►la 01. t'bi 011110M Streat, 620.f-.. oath of Owflsld Avllgtm A legal dosaip"i is On ells ,iN Nre, 197-2.—, both days inchisive, and as often during said period slid Planning oepertt"11.ot+iaw I . times of m it are. inv' publication as sold paper was rm;tllarly issued, and in the All ItAOMtsd parsettWI i !attend said hearing and eMeprsse.thetr regular and entire issue of said vowspape'• uroper, and not In It opinions for.a►..#*Inst wrid.2ef Casa l supplement, wid said notice. wLs -�.ibllched 1 ties eln on the following further Irrf-Miltion rney' I►e dabinoi dates, to-wit: from.0..S.I"t at,thq GRy,f,1w (�11'tJtbi�Mj�i►•`tJr'1117y: ' , i1� '4}r'';k". sy�UCIA M fig.°T*V*t",'- C�v all* 1% uMsher Sumcribed and sworn to before me this __ __ tiny of tde ► 19.��. &_ Notary Pubilc G Orsar+go County, California THOMAS D. WYLLIE Notary Public-California Orange County My Commission E,cpiraa septerrebar 12, 1914 •� � a A.M fie It 5 4 •1 » ziti In0. Tu owe ad ' lida � T W al i 4' 1 lid 1.2� :6 U a Cr 4v- � >riiz�a o is E 49 4 • • y 94 NNvo Ilk lk ANN IL Imp .va'�;tis° e� .�cam"<�„°�iR'A ��:.�G+O'd► dP� �rt v0E f��,�fps 'i 1 1 ''1 •� Publish Postcards NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Imse 0200 NO ?a NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center , Huntington Beach, at the hour of , ;Igo P. M. . or as soon thereafter as possible , on tile ddy of 19 ,,., far the purpose of considering E a petition for a rt•:aage of aoa• an 1,p9 acres of lead from a2 Medium Density aestdential District to R3 Office-professional DL-trLet. The subject property Le 'located on the vat sl o of Delaware Streat, 620 ft. north of Gargield Avenue ,A laSal description Is on file In the PlaaulaS Departas+ot Office. All interested persons are irvitad to attend said baring and express their opinions for or against said Purther information nay be obtained from the Office of thin Cley Clark. DATED: ,�r. ,� ,�� CITY df 11O. MMIMIi MOM r By: flicia t ;l.W Wentworth Y PublishOd Huntington Bach News Apr. 5 1973. mos" LEGAL NOTICB NOTICII OF PUBLIC H[AIUNt# ZONE CASE NO. 73-1 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a pub- lic hewing will be hold by the City Planning Commission of the City of HuntinCton Bosch for the purpose of con- sidering a change of :ona on 1." scras of land from R2 Medium Density Real. dential District to RS Office-Prolassional District. The subject property is located on the west side of Delaware Strwel, 620 R, north of Barfield Avenue. A legal descripti*n is un fiia in tha Planning O"artment office. Said hearing will be hold at the hour of 700 P.M., on April 17, 1277, In the Council Chamber of the Civic Cenlw, Huntington Beach, California, on Sth Stre*t between Main Street and Orange Avenue. All Interested persons ere invited to h a r. to s I attend sai� a rl i d express their opinions for or against the proposed Zone Chang*. Furthw information may be oblained from the CRY planning Department. Telephone No. SM-5271 DATED this Sth day of April, 1972, CITY PLANNING COMMISSIOiJ By K. A. Reynolds Secretary City Clerk J, M 7"- City of Huntington Beach The Huntington Beach Planning Commission, at their regular cneeting held � .� , .. , recommended if approval has been recommended, the City Council will be required to hold a public hearing on this natter. Although there is a 10 day appeal period, we suggest that the matter be set for the earliest possible City Council meeting, because the purpose of any appeal is to have a hearing before the City Council and this is alrerdy buing accomplished. We further suggest that -you riot accept any appeal , as it will serve no purpose* If approval has been recommended other than an requested, the City Council will be required to hold a public hearing on :.his matter. However, there In a possibility that the Planning Coamission's decision will be appealed; therefore, we suggest that publication be held off until the 10 day appeal period has expired. If denial has been recommended, the City Council may summarily deny the request. However, we suggest that the matter not be scheduled on the City Council agenda until the 10 day appeal period has expired. A copy of the Planning Department legal notice, and a list of owners of property within 300 feet of the subject. Area will be submitted upon your request. The applicant in this matter is x, �- (Address ) 10 aZ 9742 %&w1AdAiC&" .44 -A (TelephoneXV,- 2-1Q4 // Kenzie th R. Reyno I da, Planning Director By w i T ZC 73-5 Cold Eldon W. bagstad RichP. 18792ard Delaware St. 901 Cataline Ave . Huntington Beach , CA 92646 Seal Reach , CA 90740 P&A DispalatroIuntington Beach CA � Standard Oil Co of .. A '*ill Slater Propertyy Tax Div Huntington Beach CA 92647 225 Nusli St . San Francisco . CA 94120 Or County Mood Dist. Surety '-fivings & Loan V. ox 1078 237 N k,jive Sa Ana , CA 92702 Burbank , CA 91503 Robert L Paul at al Sta o Div * of llwys . 10Sn Maroney Ln P.0 Box 2304 Term Annex ho Soles , CA 900S2 Pacific Palisade , CA 9c127T. (S Asst. Design B) If ll. S . D. hutdrew E . Shandrick 190 7th St . ?28 1/2 `lain Huntington Beach , CA 92646 ilun ttngton Heach , CA 92646 At o Dist. Supt . Elementary Schools Lodith 1, Peden Tit p� � Box 71 1464 Royal Blvd . Hu ington HBach , CA 92648 Glendale , CA 912n7 At s Dist . Supt . Mai' edical Arts Assoc. Hyron L Williams et at Q« 187 Main St . 11001 Pasel- Bonita Hun nRton Reach , CA 9264►; `•a 1�1r►mitux , +:A ►47��� P. C Moran Oun a l d 1, Moffett Tit 11222 C Handler ,c� , 7fi49 1 ntnnr+ ,fit . N . ilollywnod , CA 91607 Downey CA 90241 � trai'nc Yn�:, Huntington peach Co. S + Safocare Ce. Inc. .Hell Oil C'�. 4347 Brooklyn Ave . NE lnf► K K . 6th 5t Los Angeles . Seattle , Wash 9A1f15 C'A 10054 Mildred H Jettis 1,ucmard 0 Lindhorl; 936 7th St . 414 Wn1n++t Ave . Sibley Iowa 51249 Iltintington IlIlach CA 00-160 II - - C2 Ri; R2 R5 i R5 R5 R5 r R2 R2 ._ Pogo GARFIELD j AVE. cn ul N F-' i I � %rAll ill ' ZONE CASE N01 73--5 ZONE R2 2• Ci ArRES NI wTI�r,T(1N 11 M 11 HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DEFT. i . I� Affida vit of Pt#jication Ata v County of Orange City of Huntington Beach ;• ' , �91' George Farquhar, being duly sworn on oath, says: That he is a ,Is " 1 !�,• �� citizen of the United States, over the age of twenty-one years. �i�' ;. tit I•.•...r. That he is the printer and publisher of the Huntington Beech LO`' News, a weekly newspaper of general t.�irculatlon printed and pub- �VV, ..•�' n�)/�4ti fished in Huntington Beach, California. and circulated in the said ' County of Orange and elsewhere and published for the dissemination of local and other news of a general character, and has u bona fide subsedption list of paying subscribers, and said paper has been established, printed and published in the State of California, and County of Orange, for at least one year next before the publlcrttlon of the first insertion of this notice; anti the said newspaper is not devoted to the Interest of, or published for the entertainment of any particular class, profemion, trade, calling„ mce or denomination, or NN*W 0M 143A oft RM.`; XL 19ls. ' r any number thereof. " The Huntington Beach New was adjudicated a It-gal newspaper ► l of general ch culation by Judge G. K. Scovel In the Superior Court hd" tt W„" 't + of Ornnge County, California August 271h, 193T by order No. A-5931, Ile. hNrhy ,, i cewawt It11MWtt�M1�fi 2In 'Me a MoR i�ww O1 do 'Chloe ZONECAS�_h Q _ 23�._��____._. conM., ,'WWW �a'tttwa,, et t,'wt That tthe � WWI N er Mr r►wr1 MIr�nIMr' •P�N� oa ,INenOst►. ,isM''IM1 �+�lit;� Ms�1,', lt►y1,:.�r:•ft�. �I�sslf :. ew1•�� of which the•atutexed is a ranted ropy, sr 11aNM�rs;�r� � i�i p PY� was published in said � .a �,qr i�1• tM� ,� ti�1Ma1' fltisl�Nt M. at least one _ eye _ t eat hrt 11�'M!1 FW1 'wri►: ,the ital,•t!t'.Nw .Vll�ln�t gwrNltt.'' 1 cammencitv from, the _ _2�11�.. day of February �'aloes en W 19.��, and ending on the .2.�.'3d day or ebrut#1 „ _ � ,,ly 5E. 7,; w' whl!tk low, it"06 i llll�ti)IMMlolt_-low 19�, both days Inclusive, and as often during said period an(+ ft'K?M'blttar'a tNs'pty times of publication as said paper was regu:nrly issued, and in the regular and entire Issue of sald pewspaper proper, and not in a C 'MQtT I •ttnr,�l. Rest C,,jam bupplement, and said notice was published therein on the following C ty CWW ti bates, to-wit: ------•--µ-�-- '-- =------ Ee.b.---Z"9?I -�,*- _ Publtsh, Subscribed and sworn to be' me this r-d day of February zll :! o� �d; h�i. .��.. Notary Public Orange County, California THOMAS D. WYLUE Nofery IMblte-Califs►Mle d14114• Certky Mir com 118ien EN►4nf ptssw 12, 1914 Huntington Beach Planning Commission P.O. BOX 190 C"PALIFORNIA 92648 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Planning Commission DATE: February 22, 1973 RE: ZONE CASE NO. 73- 2 Zone Case No. 73- 2 is a change of zone on a 1 . 6 acre parcel of land, from Al General Agricultural District to C2 Community Business District with a 50 ft . setback from the ultimate right of way line. Location: North side of Warner Applicant: Tamura Enterprises Avenue , approx. 470 1571 Basswood Ave . ft. west of Magnolia Carlsbad, Ca. St. Planning Commission Action: Approved : February 6 , 1973 for the following reason: 1 . This proposed change of zone conforms to the Master Plan of Land Use . Vote : Ayes : Kerins , Porter , Boyle, Higgins , Wallin Noes : None Absent : Geiger Abstain: Kazi1 Summary of Staff Report : The Planning Commission designated this property on the Master Plan of Land Use as Commercial-Retail on !3ecember 21 , 1971 . Additional Information: Mr . Richard mantle , agent for the applicant , was present at the public hearing and addressed the Commission, speak- ing in favor of the zone change . 110'F'_ Honorable Mayor and City Council February 22 , 1973 Paj;e 2 Supporting Information Submitted Herewith: 1 . Staff Report 2. Area Map 3 . Legal Description 4. Sectional District Map 27 Information to be Submitted at the Public Hearl.n ; 1 . Staff �,omonents Respectfully submitted , � C ,k K. A. Re olds Secretary KAR: ja Enclosures i STAFF REPORT TO: rlanning Commission FP0.4 : Plrnni.ng Department 20YE CASE n . "i - Z DATE 1-ebrunry 6 , 1973 APPLICANT : 'rairtura Enterprises Z(:Nl: : A •• ] 1571 Basswood Ave . MA,S-TElt PLAN : Comrnercia.I Carlsbad , Ca . 92008 LOCATION : North side of. Warner Ave , , approx , 416 -ft . west of IF Magnolia IWL '�'�` 4....�_. REQUEs'r : A change of 2:one on 1 . 6 ac , �.► � - . from Al General Agricultural ., '--, District to C2 Community '= iUSiness Listrict with a 50 ft , : setback . J REASON . To construct a retail furniture s tore 11- PRESENT LAND USE, AND ZON TNG : III Subject property is presently vacant land and is zoned Al General Agricultural District . This parcel of land is located on the north side of Warner Avenue approxiMEtely 416 ft , west of Magnolia Street and is bounded oil the north by an 80 ft . Grange County Flood Control District cliannel (see attached land use and zoning map) . MASTER PLAN : Subject; property (a portion of Study Area "B") was reviewed by the .planning Commission in 1971 as a part of the ove, all change to the master plan. Master Plan Ameadment No . 71 - 5 was sub-senurntly adopted by the Commission on December 21 , 1971 designating tI,e property commercial retail . , HISTORY : At the time that the Commission was reviewing Zone Case No . 71 -53 concurrently with the master plan amendment to change the zone on subject property from Al to C2 Community Husiness District , the property owne•: submitted a letter to the 'Commission requesting that the zone remain Al since he planned to continue his agricultural operation . However , since that time the property has been sold to tl a applicant , Tamara Enterprises . 1.0 . PC ,'/0/ 73 r f ZONE CAS!: NO . 73 - 2 2 . February 6 , 1913 i ENVIRONMENTAL REV :FW CONSIDERATION : A..! subiEc ;: property is a 1 . 55 acre parcel of bind master ` plann;td for commercial retail uses , the request before the Commission may qualify as an exclusion under rule thrive. of the environmental review prccedures . Rule three states that commercial , industrial and professional projects of less than thi ee acres shall be excluded from EIR require - ments . RECOAAIENDAT I ON : In view of the above information , the Staff recommends approval of Zone Case No . 73 - 2 . I PLANNING ZONING (.1M 97 EC; T + 0NAL 1) 1 .) TRIC:' T MAP 24-- 5 - 11 ;,_, 1►,II r 0I I r �N./'1! 1lD•Whl lP, 11•I (,. Iw'lu_1'y s111 —r �{ UT/ (:� �( 01GIy114f! aJ {,1 r f...1 ..� . ... •,„a r�C9 (1 I.,r _ft'_ !1!100MI' 1... r Q.IS. ll.I 'A f 1 K• r'►i Ito r t R• I),1 ,. ,. ,, , ■.r1.11 •Ira,l 1lyp;►j—'yp■(- ■{■ifi (�'ppp�����jj1 -l■f�! �j I A<�' / •�{ey11• + 11. ., I j f•'• 11 I V 1! .Y...R•i_1I \• -ll �� � \ �'•1' ,� 1� � .L I-r,•.t 77. .i t..t I,�� nn11 � ` 1 }� i r•I/•N I<Ilr .I . _.1 ,,.Prl. a c11.,. O R A N G �1, COUNTY . � A 1. 1 l' O R N 1 :1 i • �. �cu 1. ,.rr Vl,n( •►•n. N (v A:.;"'^rn EIY :UNE C,a�E �t r�44 uc, I.(i.)4 '14.t"1,f�l.rl/, '�'. !(',!&a.411.451.4 Tv.//7.U1. {6_!, 4 ,•P, 111t Pr•1{•1.•••11 EI ,1,G1• 1PC/( •,lt j.. I'. 1..` IrF) Srlfll 11[.:tin .114r 1.1 •.,�/d r.r W.I• .11 VMI A, � ai t•1 . -�_ .a. o I R3 \ )I !, C2 • b �2 R3 i J ' -_ __ R 3 11 ■1. . a!t ,Cl2 n� FRI RI1.._ICERI RI RI IU .'r RI •URIRI RI RI Al I ; HII. 7 I 11\.01 RI RI RI L_`— RI _ J �Ix,. c• RI i .o.(. 1. RI ofvrtl CA. �Ii�/111t RI on RI HI C 4 r (�rM N► (111 nl r jl IY- R� pI III RI (* HI r Rt Y CF-E all, Io 1 1 � ,L..rw,r ' I�.1•', Y.•. -.11 itM' RI r 7 �J G4 RI R1�J RI'S �RI RI ^( RI K RI c�wr±{1^-= p rs, J 2 '' rr f r.1. , 67 --___ -.. .. l Al Q rt l (_ nA Will RI RI _RI RI �x r____ ...___ itr - _ _ Iu• r. pl _ttvts�.� M c l� RSIgI RI C�' _C' I 9, .U.,1,+ C SIn,:�� .1 ► I r.l tt uru1L � RI f rR3 Rs C4 y RI .1 .ate;�u�. C 2 RI 03 Wa NEH 'FvE lROYAL (AFTl rN__I k T OFT �. T -, I •.i _ r !� .KEN►—, I; �� A--1 R--1 \ VC . :ram WARNER CITY c) )UNTIck. A,.' EY >r y v) • ZONE CASE NO, 73-2 ZONE A-1 rc c-2 Ifl�till�{,Iflti RI<tl H HUMTIMGTON MACH PLANMIMG KFT. M � r it 'Now 0 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 24- 5- 12 gill ;w crry OF � HUNTING r rON BEACH 011AN (AI; COUNTY, (IA1,11"OHN .IA USE OF PROPERTY MAr •• (,M,• N �• MCI• . c •,r J PACIFIC OCEAN 1 I • M�C I L L L W -1 1111LLIf4 R VALENCIA � � I IT I I � C(i R3 FhIESLAND T.017 1 i CF - E • 1� 1 - -R 1 I ~ SLATER �._. . .__.. _.,.._ ._ _•{_ _ _ T `. . � h , d C�4 fp�.1 '• ► ' cr yx� LK 1 Z 1.. 1 f MASTER ELAN 14UN T INi f OIM MOWN M A 011l1NL DI PT That portion of the Feet bmlf of the :attf,hvnnh gim•-tnr ` 1 of the Southeast gi rter of :ertl on r2h , "'j,.•,.r-%.4 p Range 11 I-lent, :in the Rancho T.ne nolsou, r of Fiunti.,, ton Bench) State of Californiny an ol:o.m on o Mzeip, thcrcot � recorded in Poo)o 517 rage 11 Of mrat-^11 nrmo M pai rce6rdn ' 21. of said County, lrinr, fl..otttherxy and lout-heratcrly of the V,rip of xnnd 65,00 feet vl4e., dererlbed ,n dead to the . . Orange County.Flood Cunt of Matrict recorded inns►ary ^3; , ;•� � 1963 in Poole 6ho9, Page 684 of Offic3 nl. Ftecordn of cnld ` County. Except there fro^ the Fhtrtrrl.; r ' t• V 1 ' 1 ....... ♦: .^1. .. ::•.1�Sw�.3'i.d.�.,j...`... -'PL`�'tiid +:�- .:_`:�..1�.�1• .d.:,.:' .'.'�.+,.1,.ii .. Pubilafted Wi—Aingtoan Beach News Feb. 12,1911 NOTICK OF :*JBLIC MRAPIN01 XONR CASK NO. 77•2 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a pub. Ilc headnC will be held by the City Council of the City of Huutington Beach, In th4 Council Chamber of the Civic Center. Huntington Beech, at the hour of 7100 P.M., or as am thereafter as possible, on Mondry the ath day of March, 1973, for the purpose of con- sidering u petition for a change of :one on a 1.6 atwe parcel of land from At General AgOcultural District 'n C2 Con} munhy Business District, with a 50 ft. setback from the ultimata rlaht of way line. The sublect property Is located on the north rids of warner Avenue, ap- proxlmately 470 fast west of Magnolia Street. A local description Is on file In the Planning Department Mica. All Intemsted puns arc Invited to attend sold hearing and express, their opinions for or agalnnt sold Zone Cue. Further Informatlon may be obtained from the Office of the City Clu-k, DATM 2/16/73 CITY OF HUNTINGTO14 BEACH bri Paul C. Jones City Clerk Publish 2/22/73 Pin . Card-ituck 30 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CASE NO. 73-2 NOTLCE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center , Huntington Beach , at the hour of „ 7 : 00 P. M. , or as soon, thereafter an possible , on Monday the 5 h..__._. day of March , 19 73 , for the purpose of considering a petition for a change of Zone on a 1 . 6 acre parcel of land from Al General Agricultural District to C2 Community Business District, with a SO ft . setback from the ultimate right of way line . The subject property is located on the north side of Warner Avenue, approximately 470 feet weiit of Magnolia Street , A legal description is on file in the Planning Department Office. All intereisted persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said Zone Case , Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk. DA72D 2 16 73 CITY OF• RUNTING''TON NE CH y: Paul C , Jones City Clark City Clerk City of Huntington Beach The Hunting ton Ne�ch Planning Corrmi s i lop, at their regular/adjourned meeting held 1 . , , recommended of If approval has been recor.xnended, the City Council will be required to hold a public hearing on this muter. Although there is a 10 day appeal period, we suggest that the matter be net for the earliest possible City Council meeting, because the purpose of any appeal is to have a hearing before the City Council and this is already being accomplished. We further suggest that you not accept any appeal , as it will serve no purpose. If approval has been recommended other than as requested, the City Council will be required to hold a public heating on this matter. However, there is a possibility that the Planning Cotttmiasion's decision will be appealed; therefore, we suggest that publication be held off unttl the 10 day appeal period has expired. If dental has been recommended, the City Council may summarily deny the request. However, we suggest that the matter not be scheduled on the City Council agenda until the 10 day appeal period has expired. A copy of the Planning Department legal notice, and n list of owners of property within 300 feet of the subject area will be submitted upon your request. The applicant in this matter is r (Address ) ' t (Telephone) . Kenneth R. Reynolds, i'l ginning Director b 30 Ni_ n&o r of E,,,- erpt3 Ali i.:TICE NOTICE OF PITBLi'C IIEAR]'f`I;i � LONE CASE NO 7 3- 2 ;NOTICE Ti-) HERT;131' GIVEI'N that a piiblic hearing wil l be held by the City Plan.aing Commission of the City of Huntington Beach for the purpose of considering_±. Change of Zone on a 1 .6 acre ll parcel of land from Al General Agricultural. Ustrict to C2 Community lbusitwon District. with a 50 f t . setback from tl_e ulciawte right of way line . The subject property is lo..ated on the north side of Warner Avenue approximately 470 feet west of Magnolia Street. A legal description is on file in the Planning Department Office, maid hearing will be held at; t;he hour of 7 :00 PON 0 , . r, February 6 1�9733 , in the Counci I Chamber of the Civic Center, , ::+i^t;i.ngton P,---Qch , C'f ] i forni.q. marl 5t1i S)trer!t: betwoon fIai rl ,Street Ojnd Or, inEe rt ,lnntl , . All i:_ t -:r-steel pE_,rsons ni— invi_tod to ntt onc3 !3nid healling and c,-xpres:: ,,heir opinion:-, for or agai :i:.,t the- proposed CHANGE OF ZONE Further information i,iny b. - obt.rcined froth thr• •;;it,y Plnnnina; Dopnrtniont, . Tol ,.:'Ilo to No 536 - 5271 DATT-:h i ii i . 25 th i:,y January, 1973 � _. CITY PLATTNTPNG COMMISSION BY K. A. Reynolds Secretary zC- 73- 2 ranura Enterprises Gino G . Fcyrctti Jack is Elder IS71 Basswood Ave 8842 Derek Cir 8821 Anthony Dr ;arlsbad, CA 92008 Itunt Beach CA 92647 Bunt Boach CA 92647 )range County Flood Dist. Agiation Finance Inc. Guenter Kittlaus, ?.0 . Box 1078 P. O. box 1905 8831 Anthony Dr i*nta Ana, Cal . 92702 Nownort Beach , CA 92663 li+ant Beach CA 92647 Lawrence Rodriguez error a Ruiz et P1 at '1iv. of Hyws 8831 Jarrett Cir 88uI Anthony Dr � . x 2304 Term Annox Hunt Peach CA 92647 0u.nti.ngton BEach CA Lo Angeles , CA 900S2 nisi ct Supt . If. S. Uiion High School Dis Ronn U . Barry William J Shaw 191R7t.. St . 8841 .�arrett Cir 8832 Anthony Dr Hu each CA 92646 Bunt Beach CA 92647 Hunt Beach CA 92647 , Ji r t Supt . acs iew School Dist Terry C. Meyer Harry L. Neuter. I7972 War�riir Ave 8851 Jarrett Cir Hunt Anthony Dr Huntunt Dear_ii CA 9264747 Hu each , CA 92647 Hunt teach CA 92647 Peter A Curbera UA an Oil Co of Cal Roy R . Baligad 8G02 Anthony Dr Pr arty Tax Div 88S2 Jarrett Cit Hunt Beach CA 92647 P. O. Box 7600 Hunt BEach CA 92603 Lo e1es , CA 900 S 4 Les P Elmore Warner Properties Ttd 177 range Ave Suite A- 1 Frank L L j�e'Z" ." . . �. �--�~-~�� �Y��.r S � ��49 k Cos Mesa , CA. 92627 8832 Jarr t ,'Cirek :1 pi ; l' ;'jt ��'i g�' � . Ilunx Beacl, t9�2,6AT A J 9 June Otsuka Edward It ! oguli.s Sarm Enterprises et al 7821 Harhay Ave . _ 8922 Jarrett Cir Suit Avenue605of thr� tare Midway City, CA 926SS Hunt Beach CA 92647 Suite gel Los Angeles , CA 900fi7 Jack Soball Go raid-w f- 8792 Anthony Dr. 8?92-jar tt4i-7 ..._. . ,.... • . Huntington Beach 92647 WNRt- Bea -CA-92647 GlenA Bacon Jerry F Outl'Oil�i'"._._.., .....w...._.. ..��.... ..w..,. ...._•..... .y• .... _ . 88S2 Derek Cir 8801 Anthony Dr Hunt Beach CA 92647 Hunt Beach CA 92647 �� CITY. CIF Huwinuon BEACH Id P.Q. BOX 190, CAIIFORNIA 92649 r-PT. ( 714 ) 536-•5Z71 PLANNING D April 28 , 1975 Jarwel. Enterprises P . 0. Box 176 San Dimas, California 91773 Subject . 'Lane Change No . 74-- 20 Gentlemen : The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach , California, at. their April 21 , 1975 meeting considered Zone Change No . 74- 20 which is a request to rezon3 a 7 1/2 acre parcel located north of. Huntington Center , south of the San Diego Freeway from C4 , Highway Commercial , to R4 , High Density Residential . The City Council by unanimous vote directed Staff to include thle proposal in their upcoming General Plan Amendment , and further directed that a Specific Plan be developed to incorporate the proposals of Jerwel Enterprises in order that the specialty shopping facility and ,apartment complc become a reality. This plan will be developed in a joint effort by City Staff and Jerwel Enterprises. We would therefore request that you provide us with as many details of this project as you have at this time so that we may evaluate them and begin to prepaxe them in plan form. Yours very truly, Richard A. Harlow Director of Planning and Environmental Resources RAIi: j a !(!!�!'Ili!!!i!III!I!illl!!�!lii!!!� �'!il!i► !i!i!li!II1I1!!II!III!III1I11I!i!IIIIIIIIIIIIIINIIII!NIII!II<<`` m-,wTINCNT DOCUPIF'NTS C t't'1' COUAC 11. 74-.:O i111�i1,1dill!I!!!�!�!+i!!!il►1II!!I!!Illllllil!I!I!IIIII.!i�l!!Il►liiil!!►11!!!111!II!!IIIII!Il►lillll!illlllllr YYi.. _, � „r .wu:'�Sv.� �� ..,� i. .i.. � .. .: �' . .....�•1 .�i�.. � '�.•.,�. . . ... !i,. �.�JR�1�7'..�. .. _ '��.1i�Y.3'.�.6+ .The K and W Development Karporation W11 EAST THIRD STREET, P. 0. BOX 176 SAN DIMAS, CAIIFonNIA 01773 (714) S99.UM April 21, 075 Citly l:ounci 1 cit.) O!' XI lilt itlt;Lon ;•:rlC�: P. 0. Pox 190 Huntington Beach, Cl:l i forili 11 Honorable Mai or kite: Cit'i Cou11C 11.: Attachi.ci l.rc n�-veral_ docu:nent.f; w!.ic): tire povtinent to nur wc,ic chanr.(2 hearillj;, wl.1c). 1;c'vc incll.lc?t2cf in thia felder f:ar you,., conven- ience. The final decuLcnt in a ^oiling plat map which wil.l. help orient you to the pror.Lue location find the :clatirn-OAP to ac?,1c;inirlG prop- ertie©. JMTEL ENTF!ZPRISEC TIM K Fs 1; DM- FM. , SE-:IrL 10 AT10N S 1, J. X f Partner, Pr a dent G►7K/c to Encl.. a1 A 1 C) ) 75/102 BIO•ACOUSTICAI ENGINEERING CORPORATION 1101 East Bryan Street, Suite F • Tuslin, Cabloinia 92680 - (714) 832.5710, Apri.L 21 , 1975 zrerwel Enterprises All Cast 3rd Street San Dimas, California Gentlemen : At your request we have made a noise survey and measurements on the Huntington International settlement . Five sites were selected to be representative of the noise conditions of interest . The recorded noise is as follows : Site #1 L10 -- 73 dBA L50 - 71 dBA j L90 -- 67 dBA Ldn - 71 dBA Site #2 L10 - 72 dBA L50 - 69 dBA L90 - 66 dBA , Ldn = 70 dBA Site #3 L10 = 64 dBA L50 61 dBA Lg0 56 dBA Ldti '� 62 dBA Jerwel Enterprises April 21 , 1975 San Dimas, California Page 2 Site #4 L1 0 -- 60 dBA Lao - 56 dBA L90 - 52 dBA Ldn -- 58 dBA Site #5 ' L10 - 59 dBA L50 - 56 dBA L90 - 53 dBA Ldn -- 57 dBA iSites 1 and 2 along the San Diego Freeway , 30 feet from the freeway fence, are in the 70 dBA, Lj11 , noise contour . Site •3 has an LOn of 6: and, therefore , normal residential construction using an outside-to-inside attenuation of 22 dBA will reduce the level to less than 45 dZA, Ldn, inside. Sites 4 and 5 are below 60 dBA, Ldn , and no special noise attenuation is required . Noise checks at the middle of the property were made and the level was below 55 dDA (ambient from surrounding streets) . Conclusion These measurements indicate that all of the area proposed for R-4 zoning will be below 95 Ldn and , therefore , normal con- struction will reduce the noise to less than the required minimum, I Jerwel Enterprises April 21, 1975 San Dimas, California Page 3 The adjacent: proposed specialty center in the southwest quadrant falls below the noise lavel (60 Ldn) where acoustical analysis must be made. Sincere i JOlt nttc�,.� ; •� a; (VQ \13 John I i 11 lac . , �t. , C. Direc of Lngin 0 ing Bio,-.%c up rri Bering Corp . JxH/vlc i Caldwell Barker COMMEXIA1 11ROKERACA CONIPANY April 14 , 1975 The K & W Development Corporation 111 E. Third Street, P .O . Box 176 San Dimas , California n1773 Gentlemen: We appreciate being Fiven the opportunity to work with you on the, possible development of your commercial r)roverty just northerly of the Huntington Center it Huntington Beach. We are of the: opinion that development of the property has at Last two major problems, a) the lack of good access and b) the lack of activity in the speci-Fic area , i a, ) Traffic general 1 v has a somewhat difficult time getting to your property because of the circuotous manner that crust be undertaken to arrive there, Edinger is a very busy street , as is Beach Boulevard , and of course you have no exposure to either. One mint traveose the Huntington Center parking lot or go North o►i Gothard to Center Drive and find you ' that way. You do of course have excellent freeway exposure but without freeway access , that benefit is substantially diminished. The offramp you discussed with us would of course be a very difinite asset to the entire area and specifically your property. As we understand it hovever , the realization of that ramp is very questionable and we must assume for our immediate planning that it may never become a reality. b. ) Even with the existing i'Neeway exposure , your property is "behind" the Huntington Center. All currant coirunercial activity is on Edinger Avenue and shoppers are drawn to that focal point. It appears to us that if your property is to develop commercially, as is your desire , you must create activity that will draw people. We have reviewed your proposed master plan with great interest. There is no question that a hotel -office building complex would be extremely desireable and would create the kind of activity we are referring to. Your specialty center as originally conceived is too large in our opinion and should be reduced substantially. Currently, specialty centers are difficult to lease and almost impossible to finance. We would suggest instead a well designed conbiercial center j on the order of a town and country concept that is flexible in providing space for a great variety of uses . Integrating your proposed walk-in i theatre with several restaurants would provide the nece�-ary back-bone tenants , 4040 MAC 11l'-A CCArhM 1l ftMKCR COMi'+WY a The K A W nevelopnent Corporation April 14 , 1975 Page Two The difficulty of dra win(j people to "behind" the Huntington Center is our greatest concern. We are of the opinion that you should explore the pos- sibility of providing some residential acreage for multiple family uses. This would enable you to create activity in that region which you des- perately need and will produce continuinq mousing and customers for your commercial tenants and those in Huntington Center. We believe the property directly North of the Huntington Center is the most desireable for commercial use. It is a logical extension of the Huntington Center and ties most directly to it. We suggest a North-South Road which ties directly to the Road fronting Montgomery Wards on the West and goes northerly to McFadden. This leaves approximately one- fourth of your property westerly of said road which is too far removed from the Center to be good commercial , and is a perfe,.t snot for high density residential . There will be a few problems to be worked out in the development but nothing as we see it of impossible proportions. As we have discussers on numerous occasions in the past , your property is one of the top sites in Orange County for a hotel . In the current money market however, no hotel construction loans are being produced . This could change when the money market changes and we will continue to work on that. We are talking to several office 1-aiding developers and users. We will keep you advised of those negotiations . Please respond to our thoughts in this and let us kno►y what ,you would like to do. Sincerely, 1 Edward A. Mittman EAM;pm Voubb b bills Commercial 4299 Mac Ar1tim- Blvd„ Suitt! IN Qrolcerago Gorripariy Nowl)orl liodch, Califormn 92660 714 it t333-2_000 March 5 , 1975 `Pho K & .J Dove lormien t Norpora Lion 111 E . Third St . , P .U . Box 176 San Dimas , california 91773 Gentle'.91on : I believe our re-cont ciiscL:-;s'ions regarding your propos(�d commercial coot(ir in fIuntington Deach have been fruitful and t:c wou_ d l_il:c to mention a few more recent observatiotls . We arc clui::o_ active in the Ilunt-ingtu:1 Beach arc,7, and are quite familial: with the local husi.noss activity . 'There is a subs t:an tial amount of undo- velopod co.nimercial property �Zl.c�tl�� I3c�zic)t ;31vc1. anc� Edinger Ax1cmie_ in Ilan t:i.ng I_on Bcach . Scm(.: of the doveloped propurties arc` vacant. Or have had numer- ous l:.usinLs!j hAiIL1Y(C; in the i:)asL few yec:rs . CeI.- I tRi21ly the CUrl"ant ec;oIlomic :situation has had soniU j of Ilect, but tho e +ire uthor factors i s we11 . '1ho now Westminster: Mall and thr. exp4nsion of the Soui:h Coast Plaza to inen t.ior, a couple, nave had a sori.ous affect on the commercial growth potent-ial of the: City of Huntington Beach in this area . 'Tile: new arfice-com o.L-cial ccnlj,)le'.x at the Soutli ) Z)sterl.y corner of Edinger and Dcach is certainly a well, planned and constructed dl,velopment and yc.:,t ,,lost of their comninrcial lease ar..:-,u is still. not occupied. The owners there are satisfied With the re?sul.ts oi: their: office leasing activiLi.cs but their miuner. cial space is a definite liardshi»p at this paint. Wei c till feel that your t:e is a good one !nor. a high rive hotel and office building complex for 4liz�t + part of Orange County , but it may be awhile before sarious investors anti/or lenders will participate with you . As you know, that type of duvo.lop;,iont has recently conic to a comp l ate s tandf t:i.l.l in Southern caIifornia . �r U��If;l`!i (�IIIIIf��lUlll ( ill��fllfllil, /+I:iU Iry ►il'll,'f'1, �1�111U+1I�U, r11111hI11Y, ��(41�;;1+ iiIIC� �1'�(lMICn 1 r• The K & W Developinent Korporation March 5 , 1975 Page Two A limited commercial undertaking can be successful in our opinion it properly planned and the appro- priate tenants secured . We stress the word limited in that you have a very large parcel of property and also for the reasons stated in the beginning of this letter. Some needs do exist and the enter- tainment and recreation field should not be over- looked . On numerous occasions ,in the past we have advised you to consider some residential uses for a portion of your property . We still consider that to be good advice . There is certainly a need now and we believe that will continua . As we have pointed out to you, planners and developers are finding it j increasingly more desirable and bene.fic:ial to inte- grate commercial and residential uses . There are several good examples of that not only in Southern California, but several other parts of the nation . We believe that to be especially true with your property located as it is . if you intend to ?.isnit your dev;:loprnent to conunerc:ial and office uses only , we do not believe yuu can do so successfully at this time . I ' if you wish to pursue our thoughts I will. be happy to meat with you . Sincei.ely, GRUBB & RLLIS ' COMMERCIAL BROKERAGE C01%1PANY L rent�, � . Scher Vice President i LMS : vo I i untis tan captil Corporotion April 21 , 1975 Gerwell Enterprises , 111 East Third Street San Dimas California Gentlemen: As you are aware , we have an integrated project combining restaurants , office space and retail space. The market acceptability f our restaurants and office space, has been strong to date; however, we have experienced some difficulty in leas- ing our retail space. The initial leasing of our retail space went very well with all of the space available with Beach Boulevard frontage being quickly leased. The balance of the retail space does not have Beach Boulevard exposure and has not been favorably received by retail tenants . It is our- belief that unless retail space has exposure from major streets or has the benefits, of major department stores , that retail terinnts are reluctant to locate there. Sincerel%� yours , K. i�ILI.IAMS Director of Development CKW/so 161OR Beach Boulevard • Suite 200 + Fluntingtohi Beach, California 92647 • (714) 847.253. 1 r •jr -. - - f v /iJ �' �\� •�� 1 r Tom'� �v , � \V Q �1 Iil � � i , l I I V I � i l Xzl `� ��•� 1, r[J�l t... _... .. .... M•(. i ,•� _._..•.'WJr.M-�..�.rJ._A�.IM M_r.�r.AW.._ , `, •` 1, 1 I .-..�._r}�..w-._wr I . .._ 1 I • _� •. u 4 illlllllllf Iflllllllf 11111111111111IIIIllfull!11111�111C�111�11111111111111111111�11�1��I�I�I�If I I�l� . J . ERTINENT DOCUMENTS HUNTI:NGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL _ ZONE? CHANGE =' 7G-20 - . .=^ I i 111111111111111(III II(11111111 III IIIIIN111111111l111111111111NIINIll11(If -.,i 11111(111 Illlllll fill 11 I If I III ( I , y The K and W Development Korporat ion 1W Jkli EAST THIRD STREET. P. O. box 176 SAN OIMAS, CALIFORNIA 91773 April 21, 1975 City Council City of Huntington Peach P. 0. Pox 130 Huntington Aeacli, California 92649 Honorable Mayor and City Council: 4ttached are neveral documents which, are pertinent to our zonr: chs.nge hearing, which we've included in Chia fclder for ,your eonven- fence. The final document is a zoning plat map which will help orient you to the precise location and the relationship to adjoining prop- erties. Very truly yours, JER`rEL ENTERPRISES T11 K & W �DE�V - C= KO RATION D J. KL , Partner� Pr ent GJK1c10 Encl. • i! j , O 75/102 810•A000S71CAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION 1101 Eat &ym Sheet, Suite F • Tustin, CaMomia 926M • (714) 832.5710, April 211 1975 Jerwel Enterprises III East 3rd Street San Dimas, California Gentlemen: At your request we have mane a noise survey and measurements on the Huntington International settlement. Five sites were selected to be representative of the noise conditions of interest. The recorded noise is as follows : ' f Site #1 L10 73 dBA L50 71 dBA L9 0 67 dBA Ldn 71 dBA Site #2 Llo 72 dBA 1150 69 dBA L90 66 dBA Ldn 70 dBA Site #3 e L10 64 dBA L50 61 dBA Lg0 56 d5h Ldn 62 dBA Jerwel Enterprises April 21 , 1975 San Dimas , California Page 2 Site #4 , L10 60 dAA L50 0 56 dBA L90 a 52 dBA Ldn 58 dBA Site #5 ' L10 59 dBA L50 56 dBA L90 53 dBA Ldn 57 dBA Sites 1 and -2 along the San Diego Freeway, 30 feet from the freeway fence, are in the 70 dBA, Ldn, noise contour . Site 3 has an Lon of 62 and, therefore, normal residential construction using an outside-to-inside attenuation of 22 dBA will reduce the level to less than 45 dBA, Ldn, inside. Sites 4 and 5 are below 60 dBA, Ldn , and no special noise attenuation is required. Eloise cheeks at the middle of the property were made and the level was below 55 dBA (ambient from surrounding streets) . Conclusion . These measurements indicate that all of the area proposed for K-4 zoning will be below 65 Ldn and, therefore , normal con- struction will reduce the noise to less than the required minimum. I Jerwel Enterprises April 31 , 1975 San Dimas, California Page 3 The adjacent proposed specialty center in the southwest quadrant falls below the noise level (60 Ldn) where acoustical analysis must be made. Sincere „��Essiu,y41 , John Direc of Engin ing Bio-Ac eering Corp. rf Of CA4�F�� JKH/vlc Coldwell Bankor COMMENCiAL 8X>1Pnct COMPnrn April 14, 1975 lo ent Cor ation TheK �4WUev_F Development or p p 111 E. Third Street, P .O. Box 176 San Dimas , California 91773 Gentlemen : We appreciate being given the opportunity to work with you on the possible development of your commercial property just northerly of the Huntington Center in Huntington Beach. W, , �ee of the opinion that development of the property has at least two major problems , a) the lack of good access and b) the lack of activity in the specific area, a. ) Traffic generally has,..a somewhat''difficult time getting to your property because of, the circuotous manner that must be undertaken to arrive there. Edinger is--a very busy street , as is Beach , ilouleva rd , and of. course you have no exposure to either. One must trav&se the Huntington Center parking lot or go North on Gothard to Center Drive and find you that way. You do of course have excellent freeway exposure but without freeway access , that benefit is substantially diminished, The offramp YOU discussed with us would of course be a very d4'f.W to asset to the entire area and specifically your property. As we understand it however , the realization of that ramp is very questionable and we must assume for our immediate planning that it may never �e,,ome a reality. b, ) Even with the existing freeway exposure , your property is "behind" the Huntington Center. All current commercial activity is on Edinger Avenue and shoppers are drawn to that focal point. It appears ,to us that if your property is to develop commercially , as is your desire , you must create activity that will draw people. We have reviewed your proposed i master plan with great interest. There is no question that a hotel-uifice building complex would be extremely desireable and would create the kind of activity we are referring to. Your specialty center as originally conceived is too large in our opinion and should be reduced substantially, Currently, specialty centers are difficult to lease and almost impossible 11 to finance. We would suggest instead a well designed cone rcial center it on the order of a town and country concept that is flexible in providing � spacer for a great variety of uses. Integrating your proposed walk-in jl theatre with several restaurants would provide the necessary back-bone tenants . �I 4M AMC M111UR 6CK fUVAn)•li(WiVIT NIACI I,f;N1iVIMA 9Vj?A)•VV)Mil 1115.A CC+iIyV1M UMfKI R COMrANY The K A 'W Development Corporation April 14, 1975 Page Two The difficulty of drawing people to "behind" the Huntington Center is our greatest concern. We are of the opinion that you should explore the pos- sibility of providing some residential acreage for multiple family uses. This would enable you to create activity in that region which you des- perately need and will produce continuinn housing and customers for your commercial tenants and those in Huntington Center. We bel. eve the property directly North of the Huntington Center is the most desireable -for commercial use. It is a logical extension of the Huntington Center and' ties most directly to it. We suggest a North-South Road which ties directly to the Road fronting Montg6mery Wards, on the West and goes northerly to MicFadden . This leaves approximately one- fourth of your property -westerly of said. road which is too far 'removed from the Center to be go;id commercial , and is a perfect snot far high density residential . There will be a few problems to be aiorked out in the development but nothing as we see it of impossible properfions. As we have discussed on numerous occasions in the pa;,t , your property is one of the top sites in Orange Ca�inty for a hotel . In thia current , moneymarket howe+,per, no hotel construction loans arej:be ing 'produced . This could change when the money market changes and we will continue .to work on that . We are talking to several office buidiiig developers and users. We will keep you advised of those negotiations . Please respond ' to our thoughts in this and let us know what you would like to do . f � Sincerely, Edward A. Mittman EAM:pm Arubb A Elliu Commercial 4299 MneArthur Blvd., Suite 100 Brake3raga Company Newport Beach, California 92660 r 714/533-29M March 5 , 1975 The I; & W Development Korporation 111 E . Third St. , P .O . Box 176 San Dimas , California 91773 Gentlemen : I believe our recent discussions regarding your proposed commercial center in Huntington Beach have been Fruitful and we would like to mention a few more recent observations . We are quite active in the Huntington Beach area and are quite familiar with the local business activity. There is a substantial amount of unde- veloped commercial property along Beach Blvd. and Edinger Avenue in Huntington Beach . Some of the developed properties are vacant or have had nuniet— ous business failures in the past few years . Cr.r- tainly the current economic situation has had come affect, but there are other factors as well. The new Westminster Mall and the expansion of the South Coast Plaza to mention a couple, have had a serious affect on the commercial growth potential of tho City of Huntington Beach in this area. Then new office-Commercial complex at the South Easterly corner of Edinger and Beach is certainly a, will planned and constructed development and ,yet most of their commerciial lease area is still not occupied. The owners there are Fatisfied with the results of their office leasing activities but their commercial space is a definite hardship at: this point. We still feel that your site is a good one for a high r sc hotel and office building complex for that part of Orange County , but it may be awhile baforo serious investors and/or lenders will participate With you. As you know, that type of dove-lopment has recently come to a complete standstill in Southern California. f (con t' d. ) i l I011lcus Ihioughoul Cnlllurnln, Alpo In Donver, line lulu, 11ho .nle. roivaillu and Mnxlco, l The K & W Development Korporation ' March 5 , 1975 Page Two A limited commercial undertaking can be successful in our opinion if properly planned and the appro- priate tenants secured . We stress the word limited in that you have a very large parcel of property and also for the reasons stated in the beginning of this letter . Some needs do exist and the enter- tainnient and recreation field should not be over- looked. On numerous occasions in the past we have advised you to consider some residential uses for a portion • of ,your property. We still consider that to be good advice . There is certainly a need now and we believe that will continue . As we have pointed out to you, planners and developers are finding it increasingly more desirable and beneficial tointe- grate commercial and residential uses . There . are several good examples of that not only in Southern California, but several other parts of the nation . Wry believe that to be especially true with your pruperty loc6ted as it is . if you intend to limit your development to conunercial and office uses only, we do not }relieve you can do so successfully at this time . ` If you wish to pursue our thoughts I will be happy to meet with you. `. Sincerely, GRUB13 & ELLIS COMMERCIAL BROKE- RAGE COMPANY � +hen�, M. Scher Vine President LMS ; vo Hulirgtcn Cap;ital Corporcton April 21 , 1975 Gerwell Enterprises , 111 East Third Street San Dimas California Gentlemen : As you are aware, we have an integrated project combining restaurants , office spate and retail space. The market acceptability of our restaurants and office space has been strong to da%:e; however, we have experienced s iule difficulty in leas- ing our retail space. - The initial leasing of our retail space went very well with all of the space available with Beach Boulevard frontage being quickly leased. The balance of the retail space does not have Beach Boulevard exposure and has not been favorably received by retail tenants. It is our belief that unless retail space has exposure from major ,streets or has the benefits of major department stores , that retail tenants are reluctant to locate there. Sincerely yours . K.PW-ILLIAM5 Director of Development CKW/so 16168 Basch Boulevard Suite 200 « Muntlnotun Beach, Calltornle 02047 • (714) 847-2631 I , I � � I -01 1,oll j loI �....i _. Li I _J7 ice"# Vit of Pubfication M d* of Califor" Cuunty of Orange 1 M City of Huntington Reach 1 / George "uhar, being duly awora on oath, says: That he Ie a {� dtisen of the United States, over the ap of twenty-one years. Tit he is the printer and publisher of the Huntington, P.•Lch �,n',/Z�� News, a weekly newspaper of general circulation printed ant. I'utY j'I liahed in Huntington Beach, California and circulated in the i 116 County of Orange and elsewhere and published for the dlawminatlon of Meal and other news of it general character, and has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, and said paper has been established, printed and published In the State of California, and County of Orange, for at least one year next before the publication , of tht.• t'irst insertion of this notice; and the said newspaper is not New N6141 lit , iiieA:1 ,'kjvi devoted to the interest of, or published for the eninrtainment of any tt :�'4 • - :^s'1 particular class, profession, trade, eallft, race or denomination, or , rlilpg r► j� ^,'.` . any number thereof. The Huntington Beach New was adjudicated a legal newspaper ' tt4nplF.M 10"i of general circulation by Judge G. K. Scovel in the Superior Court Nii M` � ► - of Orange County, California August 27th, 1937 by order No. A-5931. a � � ,. That the -ZQNE, GAMMA- 24-22 _ IMP.M or, MM Wft 6 W W. . .'>alM «r.. IM fff't6'.wr•+e •+ ,1004" kv otaMye'a sMrr,e+t� of•Nllllf ltiln .eo of which the annexed is a printed copy, was published in said news- aN ooa�l�t' vrllN': MpNatkrN•M''MM; . r..o ta.rwnwrirE paper at least - one 1 A s u 8 win+ oN,�It�:rig ,1s an tft 91' commencing from the 2 0 t h day of Ma r g h , " U25 - and ending on the nth day of March PWROM,sof►Iae, Ail ►wiw••1iw ` ri,;isti�IMil� i @Wv.4 said Na ha i>*RM., 00 19.3-..-, both days inclusive, and as often during said period and oql" fw'W,406 ."W' yl times of pubJcatinn as said paper was regularly Issued and In the ywrt regular and endm issue of said pewspaper proper, and not to a supplement, and Bald notice was published therein on the following - ONTW�'•MwMt1 17, .>s dates, to-wit: M'TV CW HIgiTIMM"" Bow �K/u1�t�'M�11MMrt+�rlM' Mar. 20 , 19Z _... a.r« 7 Publisher Bubtribed and sworn to before me this Z18 day of . Ilarah , 1-925 - Notary Public Orange County, California -- -----------••----------•---- , t#Ir �irr�+s+e Er�ins -i iis�►hssiss 1=, 11 i. i Huntington Beach Hianning OMMISSion P.O. BOX Ito CALIFORNIA 926" TO: , Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Planning Commission DATE: April 1 , 1975 ATTN: David D . Rowlands, City Administrator RE : Zone Change No. 7 4. 12 APPLICANT: Virginia Staudinger & Ralph Ashton J. I . Hathaway Productions 4207 Parral Place Sherman Oalts , California LOCATION: North side of Schliecher Road, a private street, 1300 ft. east of Edwards Street, 990 ft. west of Goldenwest REQUEST: From RA-0-CD to RA-0-1-CD STAFF RECOMMENDATION : Staff recommended approval of the requested change of zone . PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: ON MOTION BY GEIGER AND SECOND BY BAZIL ZONE CHANGE NO. 74-22 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING REASONS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: 1 . The proposed change of zone is not in conflict with the General Plan. 2 . The proposed change of zone would not be detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of the general public . AYES : � ,Geiger , Bazil Higgins , Kerins , Finley, Slates , Porter g 99 NOES : None ABSENT: None SUMMARY OF STAFF REPORT: The request is a change of zone on 2-1/2 acres of property from RA-0-CD (Residential Agriculture - Oil Operations - Civic District) to RA-01-CD (Residential Agriculture - Oil Drilling operations - Civic District) . The subject property is located approximately 640 feet south of Ellis Avenue and 990 feet west of Goldenwest. PAGE TWO The applicant has indicated that the purpose of the zone change is to provide an area for consolidation and storage of oil equipment and the redrilling of oil wells in order to facilitate the removal of existing equipment, supplies , and buildings from an area designated as open space related uses . The proposal is in conformance with code provisions for oil drilling operations. Furthermore, the staff concurs with the applicant's contention that an oil drilling site will encourage consolidation because: 1 . New drilling or redrilling can only occur on land surfaces zoned with the "01" or "02" suffixes . These land surfaces are limited to 3 acres maximum. 2 . Since the quarter section in which the proposed change of zone is located is predominantly zoned with the 110" suffix, new drilling or redrilling would have to take place on the 3 acre island. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : The Environmental Review Board at its meeting of January 21, 1975 granted the proposal Exemption Declaration No. 74-171, having foui:d the project will not have a significant adverse effect upon the physical environment. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends approval of Zone Change No. 74-22 . SUPPORTING INFORMATION SUBMITTED HEREWITH: 1 . Staff Report 2 . Area Map 01 3 . Environmental Review Board Transmittal ZRespectfully submitte c rd A. Harlow Secretary RAH:JMC : gc TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Department . DATE: March 4, 1975 ZONE CASE NO . 74-22 FILING DATE : 12/19/74 APPLICANT: Virginia Staudinger & ZONE : FL1-0-CD Ralph Ashton J. I . Hathaway Productions GENERAL PLAN : 4207 Parral Place Sherman Oaks , Calif. LOCATION : North side of Schliecher Rd . , a private street , 1300 ft. east of Edwards St. , 990 ft . west of Loolden West } a l REQUEST : FROM RA-0-CD to RA-0--1-C"D (r %J46 Environmental Review Board Status: Exemption Declaration No. 74-171 was granted on January 21 , 1975. Transmittal attached) . 1 . 0 General Information: The request is a change, of zone on 2� acres of property from RA- 0-CD (Residential Agriculture combined with oil operation in the Civic District) to RA-01-CD (Residential Agriculture combined with oil drilling operations in the Civic District) . The subject ,property is located approximately 640 feet south of Ellis Avenue and 990 feet west of Gold enwest. 2.0 Applicant' s Statement: The purpose of the zone change is to provide an area for consolidation and storage of oil equipment, and the re-drilling of oil wells in order to faci Vtate the removal of existing equipment, supplies , and buildings from an area designated as open space in the amendment to the Land Use Element. 3.0 Analysis: The proposal is in conformance with the provisions of Article 968. The oil operation site is 211 acres in size and does provide the minimum land surface area of twenty-five (25) acres . Staff concurs with the applicant' s contention that an oil operation site will encourage consolidation because: T7 Drilling and re-drilling can only occur on land surfaces zoned with the "41 " or "02" suffixes. 2. The quarter section in which the proposed change of zone is located is pre- dominantly zoned with the "0" suffix . i ZONE ,CASE N0. 74-22 March 41 1975 Page 2 4.0 Recomendati onss ; Staff recommends the RA-01-CD change of zone be approv4d for the following reasons; 1 . The proposed change of zone is not in conflict with the General Plan. 2. The proposed change of zone would not be detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of the general public;. i i i i