Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Zone Change Cases - 1974-1975 - ZC 75-10, Allen Klingensmith
Publish 9Z.5/74 Postcards 195 NAT TC t 0? MaLIC HMI NG APPJ 3 mo ;,apJNXAL - Io CAS ra 74-1 NOTICE IS HERMY GT.M that a public hearing will be hold by the City Council of the City of PeraeinSton Botch, in the Council Ch&vber of th* Civic Onter , tmtint.an beach, at the hour of am 7100 P.H, . %r as uorM thereafter at. "si.ble , on .....,Monday- the ,,...� �a day of �entu�:.....,,,..,, 19..U, for , the purpose of ; cans-'.tWr azng an a,ppeol to the denial by the City Planning Comission of a petition for a change of son* on approximately 10.8 acres of lani from C4 Highway Co® rcial District to R2-F -14 Medium Density Planned Development - I 14 units per acre. The subject property is locshad at the northeast corner of Beach W)ulevard and Atlanta Avenue. A legal description is on file ir. the Planning DepartAwnt Office, , y All ie:teres ted persio na are i.nvtted to attend esaf.d hearing m exp"Ns their Opinions for o vainst said ei ftrther infor"ttm my be obt&1=4 from the Office of the Cit7 Clark . DATXV a f'ry"m. lWror *limp. t maia' IL ftem"ay Cie* ill,tn:•.- r of F ib I i sh Onc i,EGAL NOTICE 0TI U, OF PI))LTC HEA Fi , '6 ZONE CASE NO . 74 - 1 :40TICI: iG NEREI�:' M IM that a public: i7+: �r 1 nor Wi 1 ; bc� held 1);• the City Planning Comm^:,icon of the L'ity of Huntington is, -,�h for the purpose _ f lconnirle1'r•ing���hc of Zone on app:'oximately 10 . 8 acres of land from C4 Highway Commercial District to V - PD- 14 Medium Density i'lanned Development - 14 units per acre . The subject property is located at tl)•: northeast, c:urner of •Beach Blvd. , and Atlanta A.�nue . A legal description is on file in the Planning Departm,-nt Office . :;,iid hl.'string wi ! T b(- hr! ] ,! -it; +. : : � hoin- of 7 : 00 I . .. r1lrimbNr, of th,' C ' !• Lc C:F !'?ter , 1:: +• iVii>;t;�7t'i i'.} C;:' 11 lt) :"! 1 .). rit'•}i �itr'• ' " f" ; ' (• nI O:~ z tt ee 1 .� 11 i :. ;.,,rteC,t r• r::+ �� . i nv : t ed t •tt t . �: .. in0a r xprI -,!: :: ;}t" i r opIni on. , !•(, +. +J' C N AN G[i OF ?ON Ir Furthor info)rma t i cir! ::��+;� ,..,ht,'+ i r)(,-r1 i r'�,r1 tv 536- 5271 1' � 1ua ��, i �nr'ir•t rc'r: l Aubilshed Huntirillim Brach Niws, July <. 1974. UlttAL NOTiCL ZONE CAit NO. 74-1 1 OTIC9 OF PU ILIC H[ARINC NOTICL IS IiEREBY GIVEN that a pub• tic hearing will be hold by the City Pfannlnt Commission of the City of Huntingbn Beach, California, far the purpose of emaldering a Change of Bons an approximately 20.8 acres of vaunt property from C4 Highway Commer• clef District to R2-PW4 Medium Density Planned Residential Dovitiopment • 11 units par tcre. The subject property Is located on the northeyst corner of beach Blvd., and Atlanta Avenue. A local des- cription Is on fife In the Planning O - aartrnsmt Office. lipid hearing will be held at the hour of 7%00 P.M., on July 16, 1974, In the Coumil Chamber Building of the Civic Centri, 20M Main Street, Huntington smell, Callfarnia. All Interested persons are invited to at- tend sold harinll and express their opinions for or against the proposed CHANGE OF ZONE. Further information may be obtadned from the City Planning Department. Toitoone No. t7111 SM-5271 DATED thin 2rd day of July, 1974. CITY PLANNING CGMMISSION By Richert A. Norio* Secretary fubilshad Huntington Ilaach ttcwA, Wt. 5, 1l71. NOTicE 0F' PURU4 HEARIN$ APPIAL TO BINiAL ZONE CASE NO U-i NOTICE 15 HCAL1!Y GIVEN that a puA- lic hooting will be held by the City Coun- cil 01 the City of Huntington Beach, in Me Council Chamber of the Civic Canter, Huntington Usach,at the hour of 7,00 P.M.; or as soon thereafter as possible, on Monday the IBth day of Beptamber, 1474. for the purpose of 0onalderkig an appeal to the dental by the City PlanrtintY C.om>!- m!%slon of a Wilton foe a ~go of tone on approAimately 10.1 ease of land fMm C4 Highway Cornanerolal District to RX-10:-14 Medium Dandy Planned Dev- olopment • 14 units f a.• t►'.re.The sobjeet property is located at y..j northeast cat- rrar of Beach tinulevard and Atlanta Avenue. A Is" description is on file in the Planning D" rimwnt Ohlr.e. All Interested persons w* invited In attend sold hearing and express their opinions for or against WJ appeal. Further Wormation MaY be obtained from the Office of the Cate dark. DATEDt 0-3.74. CITY OF HUNTIN©TON BrACH Byr Alkta M. Wentworth City Gerk USE !TALL POINT PEN ONLY - PRESS FIFIMLY CASH RECEIPT • CITY OF HUNYINGTON BEACH /• p.O. ©Ox 711 4 HUNTINGTON f1EACH, CALIr,.IRNIA 92645 I 17141 536-5200 CITY TREASURER - WARREN G. HALL DEPT. ISSUING DATE RECEIVED FROM de ADDRESS w ' FOR AMOUNT RECEIVED CASH [J CHI=CK A.B.A. RECEIVED BY .Aa ACCOUNT AMOUNT I" r Q• 4% • C1 Q . �TOTAL . Q-- 4/ v, `n . �. O�4 9� -- CUSTOMER N �, ~ Z .C. P74. 1 • e Jerome B Cohen Paul! A. Barry Roger M Bauman Vincent Petralia $121 Pomtigton Drive U. A. Bauman W.J. Brock 4 bonw , Inc Huntington Beach , Calif P.O. Box 355 2194 Rovens Avo 92646 Dolan Springs , Arbzona Los AnScles , Ca. 90039 86441 State Al California Velma A Bolin David W. Surrou h Public Forks Dapt. 8115 Pennifgton Drive 8221 Mildwood Circle P.O. box 2304 Tera.Annex Huntington Beach , Calif Huntington Beach. Calif Los Angeles , Ca. 90054 92646 92646 American Mobilehoae Corp. Robert A Baersch Vernon R. Gillespie 4242 Redwood Avenue lCharlene Cl,irk $125 Mildwood Circle Los Angles , Ca. 00066 44S Tustin Avenue Huntington Beach, Calif Newport Beach, Calif 92646 92660 Intrepldo Dev. Co. Beeda B. Paulkner Clyde Miley 4C.R, 2iwarw an 387--B Sierra Drive 9231 Mf1dwood Circle P.O. Box S40 fkmolulu, Hawaii Huntington Beach, Calif Westlake Village , Calif 96826 92646 ' 91361 ' Vons Grocery Co. Robert C. Wilson George R. M.eybrs P .O. Rox 3338 Tera.ftnex $122 Wildwood Circle 8135 Millwood Circle s Huntington Beach, Calif Los' Angeles ,, Calif Huntington Reach , Cai: 90051 91646 92646 State of Calif Carolyn L. Sapp Hale W Hunner Division of Hi hwa s 8126 Mflwood circle 9619 Aches Avenue Satrarento, Calls r Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 ' 955,14 i Orange County Plood Lee T. Carleton Hubert V. Sanchez Control District 9S62 Cornwall Drive Corinne M welch P,4. Rod 1078 Huntington Mach, Calif 8062 'Meruaind Circle Santa Anna, Calif 92646 Huntington beach , Calif 92646 Atlanta Center Betty R1 Hartlett 2 do Avenue 8136Mildwood Circle Harold Drive 912 Colorado Huntington Beach Calif Santee Monica, Calif 92646 r • 92683f►nst��r, Calif 90404 92d83 K-D: Venture Josephine Tyree George Howd3 0a occidental PetroleumLand 81.42 Mildnood Circle 6032 Nemaind Circle and Dev. Corrpp. ntbngton Beach, Calff HmUagtce l+eacb , Ca1if $000 Stockdale Hi hway 92446 Bakersfield, Ca. 3309 Jay► C. Zverett Robert A Asersch I inres �.. aifler 8125 lennigtaon Drs Marlene Clark COOT" ■. Nown►enaas Huntington Beach ; Calif 44S Tustin Avenue $022 Messaind Circle 02646 Newport Beach, Calif 92660 Nnatingtan Beath, CailC , 92646 Z .C. 974- 1 Lester L, worafm henry Predriksen Hurial I Mauinasaith Ronald Samolan 8032 Sunset Circle Kenneth C. La nford 8012 Mermaid Circle Huntington Reach , Calif 20792 Cataatiaran Lane Huntington Beach , Calif 92646 Huntington Beach , Calif 92646 92646 John L. Redaelli Blaine Kelsey Robert Otis 8021 Sunset Circle Leslie J. Lloyd 20802 Catamaran Lane Huntington Beach, Calif 8022 Sunset Circle Huntington Beach , Calif 92646 Huntington teach , Calif 92646 92666 Myrtle J. Croft Morris B. Hunter Fred A Mc Carl , Jr. Robert C. Mc Kinley 8012 Sunset Circle Donald S. Regehr 8021 Sunset Circle Nuntingtor Beach , Calif 20822 Catamaran Lane Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 Elmer N. Daniels City, of Huntington Beach Gerald 0. Byron Sylvia T. Smith P.O. Box 1-90 20132 Catamaran Lane 8031 Sunset Circle Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach , Calif Attn: City Manager 92646 92646 ' Evelyn Robles Evelyne F. Cochran Harvey A Charles 8041 Sunset Circle Sub. Tr. JSe t,IRS-•32032 14739 Hadris Avenue Huntington Beach , C►1lf Title Ins . 4 Trust Co. Norwalk, Calif 92646 P.O. Box 921 90650 San Bernardino, Calif. John A K!%a William 11. White Ronald H. Moore Ricbe:rd P. Xischnef Philip A Kuntz Delmar Windisch 8061 Sunset Circle 8152 lCingfisber Drive 20852 Catamaran Lane Huntington Beach , Calif Huntington Beach , Calif Huntington Beach , Calif 92646 92646 92646 Robert Grllinssev Pram 0. Neal Jack W. Burgess 8071 Sunset Circle 20742 Catamaran Lane Jack W. Surges Huntington Beach, Calif Hwitington Beach , Calif 2838 bra,PaTk CaliflewDrive 92646 92646 Alhambra, Cal 91803 �fxslmtix Ernest V. Moyles Alfred W. Henriot 20762 Catamaran Leine 20872 Catamaran Lane Huntington Reach , Calif Huntington attach, Calif 92646 92646 Crate B. Ulbon Florence T. Lingle Norman !lice Joe Herawides 445 Via Lido Soud 20812 Catamaran Laue $062 Smsst CircleMe ort Beach, Calif Huntington beacki Calif Huntington Beach , CalifL 92660 92646 92646 tea M Meeker Millian D. Barkhuff Milton J,e -Bacon Loud Co Lumptd Za7112 Crtrmaris Laaae vi all co A042isupset Cir le Huntin ton Beach Calif � rt see, Cap vat al on boara., Calif 92646 s � 96312 .92646 ' Z.C, 074-1 N James •G. Radat�4oug11 Norman E . Brown Charles H. White 2672rZ(;72' Narnstvc►rth Lane 8141 Kingfisher Drive 2t]e21 Catamaran Lane -cPa n Beach, Calif Huntington Beach , Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 92646 Gay Van Ivey John P . Crater James G. blagabaough A13I Kingfisher Drive 20832 Catamaran Lane Joseph ltuffino Huntington Beach , Calif Huntington Reach , Calif 20922 Catamaran Lane 92646 92646 Huntington Beach , Calif 92646 Dave E . Atkinson William 11. white 11ans A Petersen P. O. Box 667 8121 Kingfisher Drive 612 Greenmeadow Avenue Huntington teach , Calif iuntington Beach , Calif 92 Tustin , Calif 92646 92646 680 Kenneth L. Pike Jaxe s T. Dawes Barry Pe lock a1S2 1zve1 a Circle 20731 Catamaran Lane 103 Mary 'stay 11untittgt:on,Beach , Calif Huntington Btiach , Calif Los Gatos , Calif. 92646 926461 9SO30 John 11. Westenberger Jerry V. Brandewte James W. Alien Larry .E. Nord Jesse E: Welch 218 Knoxville- Atrenue 8151 Evelyne Circle 20741 Catamaran Lane Huntington Beach , Calff Huntington Beach , Calif Huntington Beach , Calif 92648 92646 92646 Roger Bouthillette Warren J, Glidden Fred B. Wilson R.D. Stakes , Jr 20 761 Catamaran Lane 20871 Catamaran Lane SiS2 Seabird Circle Huntington 0,,-ach, Calif Huntington Beach , Calif Huntington Beach , Calif 92646 92646 92646 Jose A Uribe Rweviond W. Teys Wallace T. Gil•tner S1S1 Seabird Circle Jeanette J. Anthony Karltan D Skindrud Nuatington Beach , Calif 20771 C:atidmaran Lane Z0881 Catamaran Lane 92646 lluntingt A Bench , Calif Nuntingttm Beach, Calif 92646 92646 Nick A DA Mos , Jr. Herbert V. Christopherson Lionel K. Toney 81S2 Mary Circle 20761 Catamaran Lane Jaw Catamaran Lane s s C, Ross Huntington Beach , Calif Huntington Beach , Calif 20891nR tan Beach, Calif g2646 92646 92646 Steven J. Liddas Donald E . Nicholson P. O, Dc S. Ray 8151 f4arr Circle Zt170'1 Catamaran Lane P. O. ngt n b 1-luntington Desch. Calif ltuntingtonrReach , Calif Huntington beach , Calif 92646 92646 9264R Ter A ry Conroy Louis J. Kaa Roger H. Bowman 5151 1�i:A Either Drive20401 Catamaran Lane 20911 Catamaran Lane Huntington Haaoh, Calif flunti�ngtoon Reecho Calif Huntin!,-;ton Beach , Calif d2646 92646 92646 � Z .C . 074-1 • Hag K. alsson ll. D. Dlearntary School 1671 Roosevelt Rd. 770 - 17th Street Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach , Calif 92649 Attn: District Supt . Charles F. Divelbiss Dept. of transporation John H. Ford 210 So. Spring St.- 0122 Snowbird Drive Los Angeles , Ca. 900S2 Huntington Beach, Calif Attn : Staff Asstn .DesignB 92646 Kenneth D. Moore 6132 Snowbird Drive Huntington Beach , Calif 92646 Peter M Kilkenny 8142 Snowbird Drive Huntington Beach , Calif 92646 James B. May a1S2 Snowbird Drive Huntington Beach , Calif 92646 Richard A. Hutchinson 8162 Snowbird Drive Huntington Beach , Calif 92646 Phyllis A. whine e1e2 Snowbird Drive Huntington Bench, Calif 92646 Roy y. Watts 8192 Snowbird Drive Iuntington Beach, Calif 92646 Evelyn* P. Cochran ' Title Ins . i Tr. Co. Trust Dept. Q514248 800 N. Nain Street Santa Ana, Calif 92707 Me Won Iligh; Mooi 1902 - l7th street IIIAtin t" loach, Calif Attn: listrict Supt. I , To : City Clerk The enclosed letter has been forwarded to the planning Department . Its contents are self explanatory and a copy of it was vent to you so that you may be forewarned. 1 t. r /l7 UILVAt AT LA%' Y.O. nox {bl COhONA DUL 1'tWls U LIFUH L.. QUA?i (714) 833-1.536 September 27 , 1974 City of Huntington 'Beach P .O . Box 190 Huntington Beach , California Att : Planning Department Re : Zone change Care No. 71-1 : M . J . Ereck u Sons , Gentlemen: The undersigned wi:,.i h.i representing M . J . Brock & Sons , Inc. the applicant on the subject zone chance .. in the matter of the appeal of the Plannirc Coi=isslon ' s decision to the City Council on Oc+o;Der 7 , 1974 . It is specifically requantod that the foilo- inc.; information in your files be transmitted to each City Counc.il.man prior to the meeting of oatober 7 , 1974 , so that: each councilman may have the opportunity to review the:,e it-em.3 ; 1 . The letter ::rom ti . J . Crock & SOns , Inc . of August 14 , 1974 , and its enclosures ; 2 . The Cormice McConnell Economic Suzvey of September 17 , 1973 ; 5^nd 3 . The Enviromental Impact Report prepared by ilestec Scrvice5 , lnu. Thank you fox your continued cooperation in thi-- matter . � Sincerely , JAMES M . PARKER JMP :by I cc : M. J . Brock & Sons , Inc. Att : Vtncent Petralia Orse Je BRO./ C K SONSdn ill 61. ( lll� ll'(! ('lrl /'.�' �.� /�l ' I'r 'lIJ /11' /',�• ' ~r.r��a � 1.iCt 111.E 9-41%4M 2 -04 ROWCNA VCN11C • LOS AFIGCLCS, CN1.IFOIINIA. 00030 IARCA %. I31 13O3-�201 September 27, :974 City Clerk City of Huntington Reach P. U. Box 190 Huntington Beach , California 102648 Subject: Appeal of Rezone Case 74- 1 Gentlemen : This letter is to inform you that James M. Parker will be representing M. J. Brock & Sons in the subject apYQal . Very truly ycurs , Vincent Petra 1 i a Division Manager VP/i % cc: James M. Parker City Planning Dept, AN s CURWORATION COMPANY I N*J. BROCK & SONS, iw. Comtroeters/Developers N904 OW.,IWA^VtMY[-LOS/►f GCUS.CALIF.90036 • •� City Clerk City of Huntington Beach P. 0. BOX 190 j Huntington Be:-Ch, California 92648 JJLMZ8 M. PARKBA ♦rroltNXY AT Law P.O. DOI sea CORONA UItL MAM. CALMORxu $9695 ( 714 ) 833--1536 September 27 , 1974 City of Huntington Bench P .O . Box 190 Huntington. Beach , California Att : City Clerk Subject : Z--)ne Change Appeal 74-1 gentlemen : ►'he iindersignel will. be representing L:he .Applicant , M. J . Brock S Sons , Inc. at the City Council hearing of October 7 , 1974 in the subject zone change appeal . 1 believe that it is important for the City Council to understand the scope of the proposed residential development proposed by the appellant for the property in question in order that the appeal may be fully and fairly considered . I am therefore making this request for approximately 90 minutes of hearing time within which to make such a presentation .ind also reviest that a slide projector be made available as we anticipate using a few slide projections to better illustrate our presentation . In the event there is any objection to the foregoing request , I would apl-reciate being so notified as soon as possible aince our preparations will rely on the time and equipment requested . Thank you very much for your attention to this matter . sincerel JAIL! S M. PARKER iMP :bp cc : M. J . Brock & Sons , Inc. • '• 1 -ram JA]M8 3L PAR - �. •�umm ` TT&` { J 1 I City of Huntington Bea.^.h P .O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California Att: City Clerk imp :by 10--1-7 4 •I Ci Eak HUNti +fAClt, CAL1�, '"4 OCT ; 31 P ROMMElmT ' 5 ARGUIML-14 T Zone. Changa Application/Appeal 74-1 (C4 to PRD-R2) Not every zone change application is inherently bad . Bad zone clianges are those that wor): a hardship on the Community generally or which result in an unnecessary hardship on the immediate neighbors . Good zone changes are those that benefit the Conununity generally and (under the best of circumstances ) either do not harm or , positively benefit the immediate neighborhood . M. J . Brock & Sons , Inc . the owner-applicant in this appeal , believes that its proposal will result in over.:ll gar: for the entire community and a positive benefit to the immediate ne-'*ghbuL hood . This position is based upon the Facts of the case : an unan'-icipated change of circumstances from the original C4 zoning , the present acono;mi.cs of site development , the immediate and long range needs of the community and the essential enviromental, benefits resulting from the proposed change . 1 . CHANGE Oi CIRCUMSTANICES : In the 20 year period from 1960 to 1980 , the total population of the City is anticipated to leap from 11 , 492 to 197 , 000 , most of which increase has already occurred . This stupendous and wholly un- anticipated development has and will. continue to Justify planning adjustments where the facts justi.iy them . 2 . ECONOMICS : (A subject not always welcome in a discussion of community p?anning) . The McConnell Economic Survey attached as Appendix D to the Westec EIR, clearly indicates the v-:ry high risks inherent in any commerri.al development in this already ccnunercia.11y o•rer-deve) ,_:ed area . The risks referred to are not those of the other- j developer alone ; the Survey indicates that over-c.orc►merial- ization can have a deleterious effect on the community-- at--large . . As a corollary , and one that should be noted at this point , the report by Ashley Economic Services , Inc . The Fiscal Imnact of Urban Growth referred to on page 46 of tie EIR , is a case study analysis which factually reflects the often quoted but prejudicial maxim that residential development is a drain on community resourczs . This report is commenced to you and your staff riot only for this applicatio;a but, for its informational value . 3 . ENVIROMENTAL BENEFITS : Of the 10 elements of enviromental `. . impact analyzed o`-n page 68 of the EIR, only 4 reflect a positive or Less negative effect from commercial develop- ment while all cf the remaining 6 impacts are positive in a residential development . Of these 4 , one relates to Revenues ( refute,l by the Ashley Report) , one relates to Solid Waste Disposal (and here the impact is merely less negative) and the last is natural gas service (but tFie"- Gas Co . has indil:ated that providing service to a residential development can be accomplished without an Ia significant impa,.t-see pages 51-51) . ON i _ _ 1 As a furthar benefit , M . J . Brock & Sons , Inc. does not plan to develop the property to its maximum allowable densit,..? (i .e. 15 Dwelling Units per acre) but will develop only 130 units on the site . (A density of 12 . 1 D .U . s/acre) . This of course results in greater open , recreational space , fewer automobiles and thus , less air pollution , traffic and/or congestion ar ' from a more immediate point of view, fewer children resulting ir; a lesser burden on local schools (From an anticipated 97 children 101 elementary , 16 High School ) to 65 children ( 53 elementary , 12 High School] ' ' Your favorable consideration of this zone change appeal which the applicant believes to be in the public interest ; will be appreciated . Respectfully subn ' t d , 01 JA14ES M . PARKER, Attorney for the Applicant 2 1 •:1.7►QZ8 M. PLREEb; ATTOWXT AT LAW P.O. BOX 463 CORONA DEL MAR, CALWORMI. 92620 (714) 833-153 6 October 1 , 1974 City Clerk City of Huntington Beach P .O . Box 19n Huntington Beach , California 92648 Re : ,one Change Appeal 74-1 GentlAmen : I am forwarding herewith a written document entitled "Proponent ' s Argument" , with the request that it be reproduced and forwarded to each City Councilman at the Thursday , October 3 , 1974 distribution of materials . Thank you very much for your attention to this matter . Sincerely , JIMMES IDS . PARKER JMP :bp Enclosure Me J . BROCk & SONS, 1110. LICE.NSL b.{f•.in 2894 ROWCNA AVCNUC • LOS ANf3CLCS, :ALiroRNIA oDo3s (ARC^ 213) f663-9291 September 17 , 1973 -vtr d Ken Reynolds Planning Director City of Huntington Beach P. O. Box 190 Huntington Beach , California 92648 Dear Mr. Reynolds : Attached is the final draft of the economic re port regarding the projected rezoning of the property located on the Northeast corner of Beach and Atlanta. I shall be pleased to answer all questions . Sincerely, M. J . BROCK & SONS, INC. ,� ' 'L�� 1. .Lt�'J✓• f� J. B. Cohen ' Land Acquisition Manager JBC :jf Attached cc : Earle R. Stump - Occidental Land t r AN � COMIF20MTIQN COMPANY 0 1 PHONE: 17141 54a'I.6769 2014 CONTINENTAL AVENUE: a COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, r. SOME Of THE A REPORT UPON AN ECONOMIC SURVEY AND AN ANALYSIS OF', MORE PROMINENT USERS SAME OF A PORTION OF THE CITY OF HUNTING70N BEACH , Of OUR SERVICES CALIFORNIA. ' UNITED STATES rOVEESINMEN7 SUMMARY I WM. CAGNRY In June 1973, we surveyed the elements which have CITIZENSNAT'L BANK particular bearing upon the type of development BANK OF AMtrRICA best suited for a property at the northeast corner BEVERLYHILLS NAT'LBANK of Beach Boulevard and Atlanta Avenue. Also surveyed , BETTEERFOODINC. was the surrounding area of influence which extends CLAUDE T. LINDSAY CO. from the Santa Ana River to the ocean and as far north MAYFAIR MARKETS as Garfield Avenue . MILLIRONS DEPT. STORES Our datCl was then analyzed. Having assessed the STAMFORD UNIVERSITY information , we are of the opinion that regardless SEARS "OEEBUCK CO. of the growth of this area , said growth would not 13RIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY only be sufficient to Justify additional commercial J.J. NEWBzRIIYCo. development at the location of the subject property, JEEFFERSONTRUST but also (and perhaps more significantly) such development would over-service the area. The financia'I THRIFTY DRUG STORES risk is evident , since there are already too many JANSS INV. CO. shopping centers in the area . JCHN FARROW GRIFFITH CORP. We, therefore , recommend that any contemplated development BIXBY LAND CO. of this property be confined to beach and residential DAVID D. COHANNON housing. Since this site is removed from the heavily traveled Pacific Coast Highway, and because of its FRITz BURNS proximity to the beach , it is particularly suited to ALLIAIJCE DAIRY CO. such development. PAC. MUTUAL LIFE INS. CO. R.E. CRUMMER VOWS GROCERY CO. Sources of data: The Bureau of the Census, The Orange EDWINW. PAULKY County Official Records and Election Board , California MACCO CORP. Motor Vehicle Department, and the Southern California BALD►MIN ESTATE Edison Company, all of whose records are augmented by HUNTINGTON LARD CO. our own extensive fieldwork. PARAMOUNT THKATREES CORP. .0 A Matter Planning Service for the investor, Developer, Banker and Broker In Business FroperNes A PHONE$ M41) 54a-67oF+ 2014 CONTINENTAL AVENUE c COSTA MESA. CALIFORNIA SOME OF THE EXPLANATION OF ACCOMPANYING MAP SURVEY SHEET NO, 480 MORE PROMINENT USERS OF OUR SERVICE NotA that the accompanying map has beer) divided into nine distinct segtrnntL (census tracts) , Bold figures UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT in each segment represent the population of that se; CITIZENS Details of segments 1-9 (population distri - GAGN$Y buti on , number of family dwelling units and distribu- tion CITIZENs NAT'L BANK of same , average family income , and annual BANK OFAMERICA purchasing power and distribution) are noted in thz BEVERLY HILLS NAT'L HANK analysis chart 1973 in the lower left corner. BETTERFOOD INC. CLAUDE T. LINDSAY Ca Solid dark areas represent existing shopping centers , MAYFAIR MARKETS and details or merchants ' names , square footages , and sizes are indicated. Newly planned shopping centers MILLIRONS DEPT. sroREs and expansions are indicated as well . The red circles STANFORD UNIVERSITY (one mile in diameter) radiating from ►:ach shopping SEARS ROEBUCK Ca center show the respective areas of influence. Obviously, BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY the W scount department stores and reg ;oval shopping J.J. NEWESERRr CO. centers draw from beyond the indicated radii , but the JEI'FERSON TRUST circles serve to demonstrate this overlapping situation . THRIFTY DRUG STORES The smaller scale map at the upper left shows the area JANSS INV. CO. surveyed in relation to the balance of the city and JOHN FARROW surrounding territory (regional centers are located GRIFFITH CORP. in red) . Below this a large sketch of the subject BIXBY LANC CO. property and its dimensions is provided for convenience of reference . DAVID D. BOHANNON FRITZ BURNS Finally , at the right hand side of the survey sheet are ALLIANIZE O%.IRY CO. first, a table showing the status of the area survey PAC. MUTUAL LIFE INS. CO. as of 1970 (based on U. S . Census figures) , and second, R.E. CRUMMEtR a table showing the projected expectancy figures regarding VON'S GROCERY C0. the population , dwelling units , and purchasing power to EDWIN W. PAULEiY 1985. MACCO CORP. BALDWIN ESTATE HUNTINOTON LAND CO. PARAMOUNT THEATRRS CORP, A Matter Plonnin4i Service for the Investor, Developer, Banker and llroker in Business Properties �j PHONEt 17141 SA6-675r, 2014 CON'rINCNTAL AVENUE a COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA SOME OF THE ECONOMIC SURREY NO. 480 MORE 1MOMINENT USERS OF OUR SERYICL In the area surveyed, status of 1970 and 1973 are: UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Number Annual WM. CAGNEY Year Population DwO 1 ing Units Purchase Power CIT12ENS NAT'L BANK 1973 579940, 199126 ,12E $17707059000 HANK OFAMERICA 1970 49,157 16 ,100 $15799279000 OEVEhLY HILLS NAT'L DANK BETTERFOOD INC. The annual purchasing power and the fixed debts2 or 1973 CLA UDE T. Li NOSAY CO. are as follows : MAYFAIR MARKETS MILLIFIONS DEPT. STORES Purchase Power $1779 705 ,000 ST1Nr Jf1D UNIVERSITY Fixed Debts 102 ,327 ,000 I SCAM ROEBUCK CO. Nc?t Spendable Income $ 7593789000 � BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY J.J. NEWBERRY CO. The total retain sales grossed by shopping centers , the JEFFF_FtSON TRUST old section of downtown, and scattered stores throughout THRIFTY DRUG STORES the area surveyed is calculated at $76 ,650 ,000 annually. The volume of businP ,.s exceeds purchasing power due JOHN JHss CO.Wperhaps to the "importing" -of business from outside the FARROW immediate area (e. g. , Costa Mesa ' s west side and Fountain ORIF*FITH CORP. Valley) . BIXUY LAND CO. DAVID D. BOHANNON Future growth of the area will certainly i,,'icrease purchasing FRITZ 13UANS power ; however, we hold that the growth will be readily ALLia5sorbed by existing centers , some of which are currently PAC. MUTUALNCE CCb expanding, Further, there are currently three regional PAC. MUtUAL LIFE INS. co. centers , the locations of which are indicated upon the ' R.Q. CINUMMER VOWS GROCERY CO. EDWINW. PAULEY ZTht're are certain fixed debts (e.g. , Federal Taxes, home MACCO CORP. mortgage payments , rents , etc, ) wtli ch are always existent BALDWIN (,STATE and which must be deducted from the annual purchasing HUNTINGpower (gross income) to determine a realistic annual net ,. PARAMOUNT TTHEAON RE spendable balance, See Purchasing Power Analysis at 'lower PARAMOUNT THEATRES CORP. left of survey sheet. 1;V A Malrter planning Service for the Investor, developer, Banker and Brukor in dusinoss properties PHONkt 17141 549 i76R 2J14 CONTINENTAL AVENUE s COSTA rAE:SA. CALIFOnNIA 5CME of THE regional wap , and u fourth presently under construction INENI USERS at Bol sa Avenue and the San Diego Freeway. Our prior MORE ►IIOM OF oue se INEN experience has shown that approximately 10% of the net spendable income in areas similar in characteristics to Huntington Beach shall be absorbed by the regicnals. The ED '�'� UK CA!^�"EY�iTAIG3 GOVERNMENT 1:rger selections , customer appeal , and greater degree of sophisticated advertising negatively influence the CITIZENS NAT'L DANK attraction of the smaller local stores . Therefore , as nANK OF AMEFUCA a result of previous indications , we have included thi ©EVERLY HILLS NAT'L BANK regional influence in our 1985 projected calculations . BETTERFOOD INC. CLAUOE T. LIN:75AY CQ But the limited acrL-age of the subject property would automatically limit. any commercial development to a Mh\'FAIR �AARKETS small community shopping center supported only by some MILLIA011SOF.PT. STORES of the nine census tracts surveyed. In 1985 , these STANFORD UNIVEiISITY nine tracts to ether show a new spendable balance of SE.rr. ROEBUCi: CO. only $5 ,793 ,000; this figu,.e alone could hardly warrant 13RIGHA►A YOUNG UNIVERSITY commercial development , nor vould it meet ir:Vestment J.J. NEwoERRYCO. safety requirements . Further , the aforementiCned "C" JEFFEitSON TRUST zoned properties (see footnnt2 3) in the area , the as F r et undeveloped c,ryn .er•s arid commercial sites roust be THRIFTY :DRUG STORES y � takeninto a-count as well . The too would place y JANSS INV. CO. additional financiol strain upon any center located on JOHN FARI70W the subject area . C RIFFITH CORP. BIXBY LAi!D CO. We believe that in time the same effort which trarsforrned the beach area fron mediocrity to the finest beach ir, DAVIDD. F30NANiION California , will certainly prevail as far as the older FRITZ BURNS part of downtown Huntington Beach is concerned. That is , ALLIANCE DAIRY CO. in the foreseeable future , modernization of the innovations RAC:. MUTUAL LIFE INS. CO. in shopping 'Facilities will surely match the recreational R.Q. CRUMMER excellence of the beach area . The proximity of same to VOWS GROCERY CO. the subject property would draw much of the shopping potential from this neighborhood. EDWIN W. PAULEY MACCO CORP. ISALCiWIN ESTATE 3The business expectancy was computed by equati og the HUNTINGTON LAND CO. present known volumes and the projected figures plus PARAMOUNT THiiATRE$ CORP. the future probability cf added commercial development of many "C" zoned properties in the area. This was also checked against the various merchant types , their parking ratio , and their annual sales per square foot. A Mosley Planning Service for the Investor, Developer, Banker and Broker in Business Properties �1� PHONEi 1714) 546-61,66 2014 CONTINENTAL AVENUE • COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA SOME Of THE CONCLUSION kORE ►POMINENT USERS Of Ourt SERVICIE1 In conclusion , it is our, strong recommendation that the development of the subject area be confined solely to UNITED S'rATESGOVERNMENT beach and residential housinc; because : WK CAGNEY CITIZENS NAT'L BANK 1 ) The area surveyed could not support an additional neighborhood shopping center; BANK OF AMERICA and DEVENLY HILLS NAT'L VANr. BETTERFOOD INC. 2) The location of the property and its CLAUDE T. L.IPIDSAY CO. proximity to the beach tare ideal for MAYFAIR MARKETS such development. MILLIR0113 DEPT. STORES In the foregoing , and 1.pon the accompanying survey 5TANFORD UNIVERSITY sheet, we have set for-th all the elements upon which SEARS ROEBUCK CO. to base this recommendation . Our thirty-five years BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY of experience with hundreds of shopping centers J.J. NEWDEnny Co. throughout, Ci lifornia and uthel- states , lends further JEF-V_KSOIi TRUS7 Support to uur conclusions . THF1IrTY DRUG STONES JANSS INV. CO. The- preceding report, and the attached survey sheet are in no way to he considered as "public documents" . JOH�� FARROW Their sole purpose is intended as guides and aids GRIFFITH CORP. in making decisions at the executive level for the BIXBY LAND CO. subject property only. OAVID D. BOHANNON FRITZ BURNS We respectfully request that these he given 'serious ALLIANCE DAIRY CO. consideration . PAC. MUTUAL LIFE INS. CO. Mc CON 'LPL IS EC0 9MIC SURVEYS R.E. CRUMMER VON'S GR=K"y CO. ol MACCO CORP, orm E. Con e WALL"IN ESTATE HUNTINGTON LAND CO. 4.J f PARAMOUNT THEATRES CORP. ALtaohed I �y\ ` A Master Planning Service for the Investor, Developer, 4a:1ker and �rukorr in Qusinests P:operties I ..n C 7 �` M • J . BROC IBC & SCANS, me. f 1 r ' J'r'l 11/I I.ICLN!fL 9�!!Atl 2694 ROWCNA AVCNUC LOS ANOC.CS, CALI►'ORNIA 00039 (AFICA 213) 663.929I August 14 , 1974 HUNTINGTON 13EACH PLANNING DEPT. Mr. Edward Sel i ch AUG 15 1974 Senior Planner City of Huntington Beach P. 0, P.O. Box 190 Box l90 Iiuntington Beach , California 92648 HunNnoton E3aach, CA 92648 Subject: Beach/Atlanta Zone Change C4-R2 Dear Ed: Pursuant to the recommended denial of the recent stuff report , we researched several established sources for- commercial eevelopment guidelines . Among those sources polled were the following : M. J. Brock , Commercial Division Urban Land Institute Orange County Planning Department Planning Design Criteria (Text) VTN Engineering , Santa Ana Huntington Beach Land Use Element, Phase I The conclusions relative to the commercial viability of the subject site are summarized on the attached exhibits . Presentiy, as well as in the distant future 0985-19901 the findings were unanimous . —ALTHOUGH THE SUBJECT SITE; IS A CORNER - COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMEN'r IS NOT FEASIBLE . Perhaps you would wish to forward the exhibits to the Planning Commission as further background for next Tuesday 's hearing . Sincerely , r� Jerome B. Cohen Land Acquisition Manager JBC/lc Enclosures AN U� CORPORATION COMPANY I 1 8/12/74 - COMMERCIAL VIABILITY OF BEACN/ATLANTA SITE McCONNELL M. J. BROCK ULI ORAUNGE COUNTY PDC VTN HUNTINGTON BEACH A B C D E F G Present 1985 Present 1990 Presen` 1990 Present 1990 Present 1990 Present 1990 Present 1990 Feasible NO 140 No No No ..0 No No '10 No No No No No rvice Area Acres Needed H NA NA 4.8 7.10 4.8 4.8 6.5 9.67 5.1 7.64 8 12.09 6.5 9.67 Feasible No No No No NG No No No No No No NO No No Study Area Acres Neec'.ed I NA NA 12.61 82.5 NA NA 57.9 112.3 45.7 88.7 72.4 140.4 57.9 112.3 NOTE REFERENCE BASIS EXHIBIT A McConnell Survey 1973 Residual Income Criteria A B M. J . Brock Theory 8 sq. `t. Per Person B C Urban Lana Institute 3% Total Acreage C U Orange County 1 Acre/1 ,000 People D c Planning Design Criteria 39 Acres/1 ,000 People E F VTN Engineering 1 .25 Acres/1 ,000 People F - _ G Huntingtcn Beach Land Use Element 1 Acre/1 ,000 People G H Total commercial acreage 7-oned: 45 acres; Land Use Element commercial acreage: 35 acres (per H.B. Staff Report) I Total commercial acreage zoned: 635 Land Use Element commercial acreage- 325 (per H.B. Staff Report) EXH I f3 I r.A McCONNELL SURVEY A report upon an economic survey and an analysis of same of a portion of the City of Huntington Beach , California . SU14MARY In June 1973, we surveyec, the elements which have particular bearing upon the type of development best suited for a property at tpe northeast corner of Beach Boulevard and Atlanta Avenue. Also surveyed , was the surrounding area of influence which extends from the Santa Ana River to -the ocean and as far north as Garfield Avenue. Our datal was then analy,:ed. Having assessed the information, we are of the opinion that regardless of the growth of this area , said growth would not only be sufficient to Justify additional coirunercial development at the location or the sub.iect property , but also (and perhaps more significantly) such development would over-service the area. The financial risk is evident, since there are a'iready too many shopping centers in the area. We , therefore, recommend that any contemplated development of this property be confined to beach and residential housing. Since this site is removed from the heavily traveled Pacific Coast Highway, and because of its proximity to the beach, it is particularly suited to such development. ECONOMIC SURVEY NO. 480 In the area surveyed, status of 1970 and 1973 are,.- Number Annual Year Population DwellinL Units Purchase Power 1973 57,949 19,126 $177 ,7059000 1970 49,157 16 ,100 $157 9927 ,000 The annual purchasing power and the fixed debts2 of 1973 are as follows : Purchase [lower $177 ,7051000 Fixed Debts 102 ,327 ,000 Net Spendable Income $ 75 ,378 ,000 The total retain sales grossed by shopping centers , the old section of downtown, and scattered stores throughout the area surveyed is calculated at $76 ,650 ,000 annually. The volume of business exceeds purchasing power due perhaps to the "importing" of business from outside the immediate area (e.g. , Costa Mesa' s west side and Fountain Valley) . Future growth of the area will certainly increase purchasing power; however , we hold that the growth will tie read;'.y absorbed by existing centers , some of which are currently expanding . Further, there are currently three regional centers , the locations of which u re indicated upon the regional map , and a fourth presently under construction at Bolsa Avenue and the San Diego Freeway. Our prior experience has shown that approximately 10% of the net spendable income in areas similar in characteristics to Huntington beach shall be absorbed by the regionals. The larger selections , customer appeal , and greater degree of sophisticated advertising negatively influence the attraci:ion of the smaller local stores . Therefore, as a result of previous indiSations , we have included this regional influence in our 1985 projected calculations . lsources of data: The Bureau of the Census , The Orange County Official Records and Election Board , California Motor Vehicle Department, and the Southern California Edison Company, all of whore records are augmented by our own extensive fieldwork. 2There are certain -Fixed debts (e.g. , Federal Taxes , home mortgage Payments , rents , etc. ) which are always existent and which must be deducted from the annual purchasing power (gross income) to determine a realistic annual net spendable balance. See Purchasing Power Analysis at lower left of survey sheet. 3The business expectancy was computed by equating the present known volumes and the projected figures plus the future probability of added e.1mmercial development of many "C" zoned properties in the area. This was also checked against the various merchant types , their parking ra;:io , and their annual sales per square foot. EXHIBIT A (continued) MCCONNELL SURVEY Page 2 But the limited acreage of the subject property would automatically limit any commercial development to a small community shopping center supported only by some of the nine census tracts surveyed . In 1985 , these nine: tracts tcrethCr s -ow a new spendable balance of only $5 ,793 ,000; this figure alone could hardly warrant co►m►ercial development, nor would it meet investment safety requirements . Further, the aforementioned "C" zoned properties (see footnote 3) in the area , the as yet undeveloped centers and commercial sites , must be taken into account as well . ; They too would place additional financial strain upon any center located on the subject area . We belielie that in time the same effort which transformed the beach area from mediocrity to the finest beach in California, will certainly prevail as far as the older part of downtown Huntington Beach is concerned. That is , in the foreseeable future , modernization of the innovations in shopping facilities will surely match the recreational excellence of the beach area . The proximity of same to the subject property would draw much of the shopping potential from this neighborhood . CONCLU51:1N In conclusion , it is our strong recommendation that the development of the subject area be confined solely to beach and residential housing because: 1 ) The area surveyed could not support an add'tional neighborhood shopping center; and 2) The location of the property and its proximity to the beach are ideal for such development. In the foregoing, and upon the accompanying survey sheet , we have set forth all the elements upon which to base this recommendation. Our thirty-five years of experience with hundreds of shopping centers throughout California and other states , lends further support to our conclusions . The preceding report and the attached survey sheet are in no way to be considered as "public documents" . Their sole purpose is intended as guides and aids in making decisions at the executive level for the subject property only. We respectfully request that these be given serious consideration. EXHIBIT B M. J . BROCK & SONSL INC, CRITERIA - w� I . Site should have minimum 550 ' depth, 2. 8 sq . ft. floor area per person within a Ji mile of subject site. 3. Ratio of floor area to lot size: 1 :4 4. Trade area should be within a J- mile. 1990 projected population - 9,670 9,670 x (8 sq. ft. ) x 4 (land coverage) = 309 ,440 sq. ft. 7 .10 acres needed for service area Additional Comments on Subject Site 1 . Too narrow. 2. 40% of the trade area in acean. 3. Better location at Beach & Garfield (SW corner) i 1 EXHIBIT C URBAN LAND INSTITUTE New master planned communities are currently using 31-1.1 of their land for commercial zoning. Service Area Mile Radius Total Acreage 502 Acres Needed Commercial Acreage U.L. I . Standards 15 Acres 7% of the service area is currently Master planned for commercial use. 9% of the service. area is currently zoned for commercial use. Reference : Mr. Matt Griffin I i EXHIBIT D ORANGE COUN'rY CRITERIA Local Commercial 1 . li-1 mile apart. 2. 1 acre per 1 ,000 people 3. Site should be 4-10 acres . Area needed by Orange County standards . 9. 67 aCres needed rur service area. i EXHIBIT E PLANNING DESIGN CRITERIA For an area of 10,000 people (1 ,600 f'dniilies) the following commercial space is needed : Floor Area 57 ,600 sq . ft. Parkinq 115 ,200 sq. ft. Oren : 72 ,800 sq. ft. TOTAL 345 ,600 sq. ft. or 7. 93 Acres Reference : Planning Design Criteria y Joseph iarg & Lee Yoppleman Reinholt Company i EXHIBIT F VTN ENGINEERING Service Radius : L� mile 1 . 25 acres/1 ,000 population For an area of 9,000 people a site should be 4-8 acres . � j EXHIBIT G HUNMIGTON BEACH PI.AN1111IG DEPARTMENT r 4. 3.2 Commercial 1. GENERAL C0.'WXRCIAI• Standards CATEGORY POPULATLON ArXA SERVICE FUNCTI0111 LOCATION SERVED RE e. DISTANCE convenience 3010 --1 mile Major tenant Intersection of People Acre food pick. up secondary market to arterials. serve neigh- borhood. Neighborhood About 4--1n 1 Wile 10-15 re- Major & primary 108000 Acres tailors, major arterial inter- people. tenant super sections. . market & often includes a super drug & bank. it I 1 1 ,1 4 rcrmy mcirz UR GUID99 FOLDERS WADE IN U. S. A. CATALOGS :'JG, U:SS1P ' I 1 1 i1 1 1 I I • t I . 1�� .. ... ,' :..:..... '...�..,. �. ,i.. .. �„• I .,':.,.:.:e.,1!7 (�1, .J.. wh. t, }:I f •tla(4fr'Yi } 1 h..t►s•If.. F .�/.!/ 1 11• I .1 •f f�Pi .t. f'4„J ,. '1. !•J. ,,, 1':IJ:1 a 1 I I i .I. .,1 i,. I .4 :1. .�f,.l.. �14i. t1ti" � ..r(�'! 11;. ,�/� "I P t .C. } 1y r /.': .k.4.i AJ'I.�'� � � I. Y`:•1. I t }tl} , �, f• . t.. 'r �A .) r..1- '1 �. ';- i.. ., ,C 1'r j I� { :C. �i '1�,7 :lii I�� hi.f.r..r„VI .1.' ,r ,f l ,f,,,. I r Y '1.'1.,., '1•• •}1 t .v�'�.Ir �'I'� 'lit ,. al I fr. '; ,C .- I!,'J eti' •I 1," '{ � J i .-I•J' 1. ,�: ti' { 3`f �•. '�,'' 'S' VI. �. 'i:I ,: f.l ',c�:, r 1•'� 1' 8'' ri•• :7 1'• 'rt ill 11+"'il. 1, �.rt• ', ���i'1xd.11. J. 1� I.J.}'.1,.J .I ., .n u. S •) �Ir �. ��-. •.l•1 �;� Sri �1 ,i'� ',. 1 li' f.. �� t �/ 1 I 4, y � 1•r�,; ,,'�f.i,• 61. •� .� 1. .r,.1 � 'c�, .�' .���:{'! ", .I t••; P~ 1 .,r .•� p •1.J 1'PI :•L..',:L,. �, r r '! 1j t, "} 1.1l 1 .t:{�1� ►,:Ual.l..: .1' d111 ri•�rl�-'1 r i':1� i. �� (! Y r I f .) �:/.� 'r .J{J��' �1 i '�}', _� . -� 't '�� '1 1� r .�•I'4..�...,. 1� "liar. .� .>;.. 1 ,i «i5 •;1.7': 11' h.,iJ:�.` .:1;1")I'f:; kJ� 7l ,tS�,i!"11�,(r.,} M....I. '.I. /...•� Ir'Lw,�,l.h•n `,: ..il'w�r•'':I }�i ••I� iY yf .�� c .I r. ,�..t..�,ry I ,��,��_� �I� !��`,�. Y;tl. 1�.�11' .1',h�•v.i3.,, f,:"4,•,rfJ,..l :wtl7riik :f.ar'7itii'.' ,A„! ..:! .. � � .. .r�11 tr �jr-s�'.:.:� I+IG..�..u..}....-..r:{�,}..�fy�.r���.r �i.�..•!_r.r:.`Y..h..,....t..lJt..a.:'S..".i..l:�i�>l�.L'f1:1��Y •�..�':-:�L��'t�:1.7�{'�.�.��.'.;rl �_ 1`�`i��1a���Ar1 f vit of P fication ty Ge Beach .� lltt XMt berm duly svMM oa oa*4 says; That M IS a of tIN X1Nted Mates, om the ale of twMnty-one years, 7%at be Is the printer u d publisher of tM' Huntington Smelt a w"Itly newspaper of Phew circulation P!ww and pub- NWW In Muntireon B odt, CkUfornla.,and dmulated in the said % =of Osaatse and elsmimm and publised for the dissemiandat and other ntwa of a gamnl dt am ter, and halo a bona fide subrerlptioa lilrt of paylm eubec fibers, and said paper has been �j/ ��r 1 retabliahed, printed and published in the Mate of California, and V V County of Orange, for at kut one Vier next before the publication of rite Aret laww ion of thin radoe; and the said newspaper is not �•� devoted to rite interut of, or published for t e entertalnment of any particukr clap, profession, t»de, calling, race or denomination, or D amgy Number thaw of. ne Hwrtinston Beach New wa adjudicated a legal newspaper of `s dnW circulation by Judge 0. K. Semi. in the Superior Court 1 wl of Orange Oounty, WtbrnU August 7Tth, 193T by order No. A•5931. 'i ut the .ZONE CAM 7 5i-10 � of w Wah the ammod is a printed copy, was Published in Mid maws- ., paper at least Qa L.A N I yB - y iriom the 151h day of aril-rX i f %2A,, and emuns am dw ..251h day of Jury 112A , both days inclusive, and as often durLtg laid period and times of publication as said paper walla regularly issued, and in the regular and entire taus of said pewapaper proper, arA not in a i supplement, and said notice was published therein an the following dates, to*it; 25m 1226 IMM Y. aPubUdw 8ubmaribed mul awe m to befaa nw this . 6 h day 0 J4U1Uff.rZ 19.-76 Notww Public Orange County, CaUfamdaC` 1'M014AS D. WYLLIE i malsry PU4116-callfarm, i r Qr�p• Coynty � i My commiN1611 Egptres i ie'fp+eiN► I!, 1471 � ..........•f.......... ... ..... 1 ` 1RIG -AWPUbItoh 1/15/76 9os tc eras 60 NOI'IC E OF PLIC I NG Zone Case 75-10 -Ok NOTICE IS HENEbY GIVU that a public hearing will be hold by the . City Council of the Cite of Huntington Beach , in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach,, at the hour of ._.7 -.gq P. M. , or as soon thereafter as possible, on Monday. _ the 2nd day of February 19 y6 , for the purpose of considering a petition for a change of zone from R2 (Medium Density Residential District) to C4 (Highway Comercial District). The subject property is located approx- imately 118 feet west of Beach Boulevard, on the north aide of Ronald Road. A legal description is on file in the Planning Department Office. I All interested persons are invited to attend said bearliss and express their opinions for or agsirst said Zone Case , further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clark . DAM -. Janu6ty 9 , 1976 CITY OF NUIRI s=N BY City X. Wentuarth y Coe �� 1 57 Number of Excerpts Publish Once LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING some CASE NO. 75--10 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be hold by the City Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach , California , for the purpose of considering a Change of Zone from RZ (Medium 'Density ttesidential District) to C4 (Highway Commercial District) . The subject property is locategwest of Beach Blvd. , 1: t.,nor-tit ._cf--Renerld—Road. A legal description is on file in the Planning Department Office. r j41 Said hearing will be held at the hour of 7 :02 P .M. , on December 16, 1975 , in the Council Chamber Building of the Civic Center , 2000 Main Street , Huntington Beach , California . All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed CHANGE OF ZONE Further information may be obtained from the City Plsnniing Department . Telephone No . (714 ) 536-5271 DATED this 4th —day of Decembr, 1975 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION Richard A. Harlow secretary i ZC 075-10 AP ' s typed by Jana H Allen Klingensmith and 111-291-22 111-291-»37 James Lange David L Dains Not in the book 17791 Beach Blvd. 18194 aiuo Ridge . . Huntington Beach, Calif Santa Ana, Calif ' 92647 92705 111 111-�291-49�19�-12 111-292--12 R,obart J Krogh Lyle D. �lwrgrave 17?81 Beach Blvd. Joyce 0lquin 13233 Rutgers Ave. Huntington Beach, Calif 7852 , Ronald Rd. i11 � Do�inejr, Calif 4 Huntiunti Huntington Beach , Calif 90242 92647 11 91-13 111-291-50 111-292--13 Ob Kellett Allen Klingensmith �eorq• Carback 7 New an 2 Nean 1?791 Beach Blvd. Cary Water Tract Co. 9�647 Itu ington beach, Calif Huntington Reach , Calif `Doh Manqano 92 4 15541 Beach Blvd.Suite 5 1111--291-�64 111-291�-1+� Westminster, Calif 1Ci' h L. 8oheithes Philip K Fitzgerald 92683 � 78 lawman Avenue 7941-C Ronald Rd H gton Beach, Calif Huntington Beach , Calif 92 92647 11 l-1S' 111-291-65 111-292-19 Manual. Coy.-deiro Edward Lancaster Fred U. 7931 Ronald Rd Wilson 93 " eilani Drive Huntington Beach , Calif 20871 Catamalan Lane I1 g Wn Beach , Calif 92647 Huntington Beach , Calif 92 92646 11 -•Z91-16 1117291�-4d lll�-29Z-17 JAn6a Lange Ch lie, Rayes FS Philip Risucci 17761- Winterberry 17837 Heath Blvd. 7882 Ronald Rd ro` i • in Valley , Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach , Calif 92 92647 92647 ill-291-A Cash-26 11 1 91-17 Rotiar' t 1I1-292-18 Edw d S. Tayloe P.O. Box 633 Olive M Harrigan 796 E. Newman Huntington Beach , Calif 7892 Ronald Rd Huntington Beach, Calif 92648 Apt. C 92647 Huntington Reach , Calif ill!-291-66 92E47 111-291-18 Manuel B. Garcia 111�-292--19 Christopher J Toland 7913 Ronald Rd Laurence L Mitchell 5541 Mosavale Circle Huntington Beach , Calif 7902 Ronald Rd Huntington Beach, Calif 92647 Huntington Beach , Calif 92649 92647 111-291--20 111-291-67 111-292--20 Roy L McGuire Fred 0 Anderson Albert Mazzuca 7932 Newmand Street 3158 Killarney Lane 7912 Ronald Rd #C Huntington Beach , Calif Costa Mesa, Calif. Huntington Beach , Calif 92647 92626 926A7 111-291-21 111-291-28 111-292-21 Paul W. Buckin?ham Gary M Robertson John R. waters 7942 mewmand 5012 Loyola Avenue 1815 Westaliff Or Huntington Beach , Calif Westminster, Calif N rt Beach, Calif 92647 92683 92 Ill-292-22 111-322-54 167-601-12 . Albert Dattels Clarence J Luis Roman ' Catholic Archbial 434 Puerto Del Mar 7031 E Liberty Street of L A Pacific palisades, Calif Huntington Beach , Calif 1531 $4 qth Street '90272 92647 Los angeles , Calif 9001! 111-3 Z3-42 212-322-55 167-4 72-16 John flantibanex Peter r, Hitahkock George Neishi 7862 Liberty Streit 7781 Liberty Street 9422 Talbert Avenue Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Reach , Calif Fountain Vallgy, Calif 92647 92647 92709 ill-' 43 1.11-322-52 H.B. Union High School Lose H Luna Lucille M Bose 19�02 - 17th Street L RRorock 1719 Main Street Huntington Beach , C alif Minerva Avenue Suntington Beach, Calif Attn : District Supt . Calif 92804 92648 111-322-44 165-181-�25 Oceanview School Distriol Rarul rujillo Manuel Etidalgo 7972 Werner Avenue 9241' hael Drive 5220 E Reverry Blvd. Huntington Beach, Calif Huntna on Beach, Calif Los Angeles , Calif Attn : DisttiBt Supt. 9264 90022 l�ll,-3 12 165-191-37 Dept. of trans' portation William W Marley R Burr Dilday 120 So. Spring Street 7682 ' erty Street 244 Redondo Avenue Lon Angeles , Calif 90052 Hunt an Beach , Calif. Long Beach , Calif Attn : Staff Assistant 9264 IT- 90803 benign B I 111-- 2--24 165-181••38 Rafa Martinez Allan E Hom 7.871 Newma►nd Street Williams Bros Furniture: Hunt g n Beach ? Calif 13838 S Figueroa St 9264 Loa angeles , Calif 90061 111�-3 --13 '111-181--40 7902 arty Street Thoaas H Dernatz Huntin tots Beach , Calif 17931 Beach Blvd. Suite M 92647 Huntington Beach , Calif 92647 111-322--14 167--601-1 Ernest O Railly Center for Special 6841 bre3eland Drive Surgery Inc . Huntington Beach , Calif 17732 Beach Blvd. 92647 Huntington Reach , Calif 111-322--46 111--601-2 Edward S . Tayloo Huntington Zntercommunity 7902 Newmand Street Hospital Inc 11untingtor Reach , Calif 1772 Beech Blvd. 92647 Huntington Teach , CmIl f 111-322-22 167-301-03 Lucille M Bose Huntington Associates 1719 Main Street 214 Hospital Circle Huntington Beach , Calif Westminster, Calif 92647 92683 PuWlshfd FAaMr*m 1111MM News, JAM. NOT1f3i OF HIiLn "MA"Ii ZOO Coe 711-11 1413*109 I�'Nt11111Y GIVEN that a Pub- lic' hodre".,7411 be, Mm by. oft Cow Council of the cm ofIlwdlnd m ftosch. In; the Covneli ,Chomw Of 'the�Civls Crnw, Huntington flteseh, et tIw hour of:740 P.Kf- or. as. umn �thweafter ss psMlbls,,on W idep 'ths;ttnd•?dsy: of. Fsbrw y, A#X •1W' &'i 004ii{sf, ` sidlri W petition for"walla of'am from °NS (Medium O"W;111"Idontlsl DlaWW tx�,C4 IH*N ry CsmW;i a l'Me-' trtcq,'_The't s<+b1+ct 1,prvFsrfy -Is loosed q*q6 tlmrlay,1,U1 W west of 1Mrah I�aod.: ''i dwenptlo�.11e se fit* In tM fMsnMnr Orpb nwm Offica Alt,Intarword pwwno'wee invled to sttand sold hasriny end mprsrs' their opwilons for or ellatnst Dow Zone Case. Further Inbomtlon may be sbtolned from the coffee of ft'City C" DiATM 'Jinwiry'!, M, " GTY'OF HUNTINOTON tiWH ft Alicia► M. ftntwall Nuntington Beach Planning Commission P.U. SOX 190 CALIFORNIA !2640 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Planning Commission. DATE: January 27 , 1976 ATTN: David D . Rowlands, City Administrator RE : ZONE CHANGE NO. 75-10 APPLICANT: Allen Klingensmith & James Lange 17791 Beach Blvd . Huntington Beach, Ca. LOCATION: North side of Ronald Rd. second lot west of neach Blvd . REQUEST: Prom R-2 to C-4 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS ON MOTION BY BAZIL AND SECOND BY PARKINSON ZONE CHANCE NO. 75-10 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE : d 1. The close proximity of the subject site to the high traffic volume state highway indicates that the parcel ' s beet use would be commercial versus residential . 2 . The ._,orientation of the subject site to the commercial properties to the -east will provide for additional commercial development alt.ernrtives resulting in the highest and best use of the properties . 3 . Thei General Plan designation on the site is an area providing transition from residential to commercial land uses , and since . commercial related uses have hAen determined as the most appropriate for the site , the request is in conformance with the Ge*:eral Plan . AYES: Parkinson , Bazil , Finley, Slates , Shea, Boyle , Kerins NOES : None ABSENT: None PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends approval of Zone Case No. 75-10 , a change from R2 to C4 (Highway Commercial) and further recommends that second reading of the ordinance be tabled until a parcel map consolidating the subject site with the existing commercial parcel on the northwest corner of Beach Blvd. and Ronald Road has been approved bl- the City Council and recorded with the County of Orange . I Page Two SUMMARY OF STAFF REPORT: Zone Change No. 75-10 is a request for commercial zoning so as to allots the subject property to be. utilized in conjunction with the existing commercial properties to the east.. The Planning Staff felt the proposed rezone was desirable because of the, subject site' s close proximity , to Beach Boulevard and the fact that as a commercial site it could provide for more desirable commercial development alternatives and/or upgrading of the existing uses. However, because the parcel is a separate legal building site with 'potential development problems because of sire and shape and because the parcel: w::ll only have frontage on a local street which is contrary to established policy of not rezoning commercial properties with only ,local frontages , the staff recommended that the request be approved but that second reading of the ordinance be tabled until such time as a parcel map has been approved by the City Council and racorded with the County of Orange . PV: .YIRONMENTAL STATUS : The `Environmdntal Review .Board at its meeting of December 2 , 1975 granted the proposed change of zone Negative Leclaration' No. 75-�79 having foilnd that the proposed project will not have a significant adverse effect upon the physical environment. SUPPORTING INFORMATION SUBMITTED HEREWITH: 1. Staff Report 2 . Area Map Respe fully submitt d , r I hard A. Harlow Secretary RAH : JMC:gc Ott- drrr�hit Port- TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: December 16, 1915 SOME CASE NO. 75-10 FILING DATE: 11/13/75 APPLICANT: Allen Klingensmith ZONE: R-2 A .,Jame Lange -17791 Beach Blvd. GENERAL PLAN : Huntington Beach , Ca .. LOCATION t North iiide of Ronald Rd . ,�• second lot west of Beach Blvd. p REQUESTi From R-2 to C-4 - • ~`:.� ;.� �7q• 11 ,rp for L 1.•0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : The Environmental Review Board at its meeting of December 2 , 1975, granted the proposed change of zone t4egetive Declaration No. 75-79 , , having found that the proposed project will not have a significant adverse effect upon the physical environ- ment. 2 . 0 GENUAL INFORMATION : Zone Change. No. 75-10 is a request for a change of zone from R2 (Medium Density Residential ) to C4 (Highway Commercial) . The subject pioperty is intended ,to be utilized in conjunction with the existing commercial properties to the east. 3 . 0 PRESENT LAND USE, ZONING AND GENERAL DESIGNATION: The subject property is ,'resQntly vacan't of any 'development . Propertiet to the east and south are zoned C4 and ,.developed with commercial uses with the exception of ari older non- conforming residence on the northwest corner of Beach Blvd . and Ronald Dr. I ;i qe Two GC 7 5-10 The property to the west is zoned R2 and developed with 'multiple family residential uses . To the north in property zoned R2 and developed with a single family residence . The General Plan designation is Commercial/Residential . A precise land use designation would be dependent upon a more detailed land use analysis, which appears below. 4'. 0 ANALYSIS: The eaub ject property in a 9200 square foot parcel directly adjacen+i o xietin4 ;C4 properties that front onto Beach Boulevard . The rezoraing request will further extend the commercial zoning an additional 50 feet to ,the west which will provide for an overall commercial depth of 168 feet when combined witii the three separate existing parcels to the east. The specific site of whe request is located behind these existing commercial parcels and thug accesrs would be provided via Ronald Road . ' l These parcels to the east are presently under the ownersh`f' of the applicant and are developed with office buildings and a single family residence . (Refer to existing Land Use Map. ) These office uses could incorporate the subject site into a commercial expansion project or the residential parcel could be cleared and combined with the subject site to create an integrated commercial project. Analyzing the proposed site as an independent commecial property would indicate the following : 1. The site has limited arterial euposure . 2 . The site would be a non-conforming commercial property in that the minimum frontage in the C4 district fP 60 feet and the proposed site has 50 feet of frontage and thus the size and shape of the parcel may provide difficulty in attaining a desirable site layout. 3. As a commercial site , it would r�rovidd an additional buffer area for the existing residential uses to the west . To develop the site as presently zoned would place residential users within 118 feet of the State Highway# thnB subjecting them to high noise levels . 4. As additional commercial arrha , the parcel could be combined with the existing office uses and incorporated with the underdeveloped parcel on the corner of Beach Boulevard and Ronald Road , to serve as a stimulus for now co;mnercial development and an upgrading of the existing commercial uses which abut the subject parcel thus providing for the highest and best use of the property, Page Three In conclusion, the planning 8taff' feels the proposed rezone ' is desirable because of the sub jslct site ' s close proximity to Beach Boulevard and the fact that as a commercial site it could provide for more desirable commercial -development alternatives and/or an upgrading, of the existing uses. However, because the parcel. Le a separate legal building site with potential development- problems because of rive and shape and because the parcol 'will only ,have frontaS..; ,,can .. at, ;local direst whion is contrary to entabl4shed policy of not rrezonino, comimercial propertit a' with only, loi;al frontages , the staff woul.i recommend that the request be tabled until such time .as; the proposed site can be integrated with the parcel on Beach Boulevard and Ronald Road through a tentative parcel sap procedure. This would be consistent with the stated development intentions of the applicant. RECOMMENDATMU s Based on , the above analysier the staff would recommend that the requested change of zone b6 continued to 'April 6 , 1976 , so as to allow pracessi'ng' of a tentative parcel map for consolidation of the subject site and, the parcel on the northwest corner of Beach Boulevard and Ronald Road. JMCsgc i i 1 R2 C4 - - - i - IN �} -C4 t-L 115 R2 C4 � J ri TAIsB$RT Ism- _tn t wt t r- Mir ZONE CASE NO 75-10 ZONE R2 to C4 " E+a v f w s • r � 1 1A ato trsrt q �, 1 1 �tr boor roloarirr r r r r . 1 I�r Irrrrr�rrrA'wrrr�irr i ;-. � rrr��� irrr irrr rrrArrrr rri ,-�, 111101 M� 1 1�01 11 � ' rrrrrr j r m11A i III Irl 1 111 fill 1� 1 111 Ilo I�rl r EXISTING LAND USES lip 1 ►- .. Mrw�w. rr�ri � r 4 • . . h • • i��rf. otal���o�rN�ffo�.:*��®e�__r�rl ► 1 • 11111�"�IIIINIIflllllll r�.r_ '��� �Ir • IIr1���OIIIe111111r11e�111f11Q10 �. •� �rIR . .eleloerlrellelralelarnr ;Mlia� 1 IIfM b' 1111111111#tltrl 11irr / 1 1111 . 11111111rr11rrr 11 a �1 III=1 dii��$$erarell uute 11 11 e e Ia11_I..g1111111 �e111�to 111 1 euli.. preeel e�ereAree a Inr �1w11 I11p11111�f1111 1 /fl I�e f iHu�tutulJu1if11 u i"fe loll i F l �1�1 eI I 1 � �ni���� � Im fill r Ill 14HI�IIH III mN r111111 loll 1 1 n1�aelefn ell r� �r � illii 111rer 01 ��.�. ,.■•■�f1R �*��..N�.Mw��■ • ■ , mil'. GENERAL r USE DESIGNATION M • i . ErNffxxvnEnTAL REMEW BOARD JA CITY OF HLNM t0TON ear-CALIFORNIA P.O. box M "6" TO: Planning Commission FRaM: Environmental Review Board DATE: December 2, 1975 SUBJECTI Negative Declaration No. 75-79 (2C 75-10) APPLICANT: James Lange & Allen Klingensmith PR : Change of zone from R2 to C4 LOCATION: Subject property is located on Ronald Road 118 feet west of Beach Boulevard. r The Environmental Review Board, at its meeting of December 2, 1975 , granted .the above negative declaration, ;paving found that the proposed project will _ not have a s_ig4if icant adverse effect Mpon the physical environment. rr �wr. rr+�.�r ■ ■ter No environmental impact report has been prepared for this pro- ject. Findings are based upon the information contained in the negative declaration request form and discussion by this Board. Me v oo erI _'Mctinij Sec y Environmental Review Beard MAT:df tt� I'f I� - ts•� qlIp'V avvit Of Pul$cafion t ofof Orange ss ?7 I at.— of Hmangton ii<each George Farquhar, being duly sworn on oath, says: That he Is a 2 olUm of *i United States, over the age of twenty-one years. , Phat he is the printer and publisher of the Huntingtc4i Beach � n NevM a weekly newspaper of general circulation printed and pub- ? ltahsd in Huntington Beach, rAllfornla and circulated In the said 10 County of Orange and elsewhere and published for the dissemination I of local and other news of a general character, and has a bona fide subscription Bit of paying subscribers, and said paper has been 5f established, printed and published in.the State of California, and ' County of Orange, for at least one year next before the publication of the first insertion of this notice; and the said newspaper is not devoted to the Interest of, or published for the entertainment of any particular class, profession, trade, craling, race or denomination, or any number thereof. ,a The Huntington -i ..ch New was adjudicated it legal newspaper of general circulation by Judge G, K. Scovel in the Superior Court of Orate County, California August 27th, 1937 by order No. A-5931, That the ZQNE LA3F' Nb. 75.-09 of which the annexed is a printed copy, was published in said news. paper at least e 1 a e tie commencing fron= the 22th day or November and ending on the ?7 t h dray of Nn van h e r `� 19 ., both days inclusive, and as often during said period and times of publication as said paper was regularly issued, and in the said ws a r proper, and not !n a regular and entire issue of Id pe p pe p pe , . . supplement, and said notice was published therein on the following dates, to-wit: , 27 , 3c)75 !' Publisher Subscribed and sworn to before the this 28 th day of November 19— 5— / 4' •� Notary Public Orange County, California '•�wwww.www wr.r..w.w.www....wwww+ ' THOMAS D. WYLLIE Notaryr 'sbite•callferaie i i Or�n�• C��MY i Mr Commission 11 Pires I 11pphoier 12, 1974 ..........--w................... i /Z- 1 Huntington Beach Planning Commission P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 TO Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Planning Commission DATE: December 2 , 1975 ATTN: David D. Rowlands , City Administrator RE: "ONE CASE NO. 75-09 APPLICANT: Joe A. Ocampo 1149 S. Lowell Street Santa Ana , California REQUEST: A change of zone from R1 to R5 LOCATION : Southeast corner of Warner and Leslie Drive PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION : On motion by Bazil and second by Shea , Zone Change No. 75-09 was approved with the following findings by the following vote : FINDINGS : 1. Because of the subject site' s location and orientation to street access : the requested rezoning will provide for the most compatible land uses on the property. 2 . The General Plan .de,signation on -the site is an area providing transition from Office-Professional to residential, and since office related uses have been determined as most desirable, the request is in conformance with the General Plan . 3 . State Planning Law mandates that zoning shill be consistent with the City' s General Plan. AYES`: Parkinson, Bazil, Finley , Slates, Shea, Boyle Kerina NOES : None ABSENT: None PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission reconnmends approval of Zone Change No . 75-09 , a change from R1 to R5 (Office Profesnional) . 7_5 ---- 07 dw Page Two SUMMARY OF STAFF REPORT: The requested change to office professional zoning would provide for a log' ;ral extension of existing land use3 to ts.e west. This results prklmarily from the fact that the precise planned access to the subject parcel was modified to incorporate the most de- sirable access to a residential subdivision that will be developed to the east. The modification eliminated the interior street and-.,required ,/access to be via. Warner Avenue, a high volume arterial highway. When the access problems are combined with the amount of dedication that will be required on both Leslie Street and Warner Avenue, the site becomes undesirable as an R1 type develop- ment. The office-professional des3.gnation would also provide for uses that could buffer Warner Avenue from the remaining residential properties to the south. In summary, the requested change would provide for uses that are better suited for arterial highway frontage and can also result in mor3 desirable residential properties to the south. Based on the above analysis , the staff recommended approval of Zone Change No. 75-09 . Frdhl'RODIMENTAL' STATUS: The Envirormentil Itbview Board , Planning Commission, and City Council adopted Environmental Impact Rftport No. 74--13 in December of 197�4 . The requested change of zone is consistent with the adopted land use element and therefore, further environmental review is not mandated. Specific development proposals may , however , necessitate further environmental analysis. SUPPORTING INFORMATION SUBMITTED HEREWITH: 1 . Staff Report 2 . Area Map Respectfully submitt , 7 C� Aid A. Harlow, Secretary RAN :JMC :gc .�. v 1 r hun#xwjkx, t he Itull r TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING DEPARTHENT ) DATE: November 18 , ' 1975 V,ONE CASE NO. 75-09 FILING DATE : 10/14/75 APPLICANT : Joe A. Ocampo ?ONE R-1 1149 S . Lowell St. Santa Ana , Calif. LOCATION : Svuthsan t corner of Warner and Leslie Drive REQUEST: From R-1 to Rw5 J 1. 0 ENVIRONt+fENTAL STATUS : The Environmental `Review Board and Planning Commission adopted Environne'ntial Impact Report too. 74--13 on December 12 , 1974 . P F The, requested change of zone 'its consistent with the adopted land use element and therefore further -environmental review is not mandated. Specific development proposals will , however, necessitate environmental analysis . 2 . 0 GENERAL INFORMATION Zone Change .No. 75-09 is a request for a change of zone on .approximately , 3/4 of an acre of 'property located on the southeast corner of Warner Avenue 'and Leslio Drive. The request is to extend the existing office-professional zoning easterly to the termination of the applicant ' s property. 3 . 0 PRESENT LAND USE, AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION : The subject property is presently zoned R1 and is designated on the General Plan as Office Professional/Low De' naity Residential . This dual designation results from the fact that the dubject property is located on a rsoftlirie boundary of the General Plan . A precise determination would result .from a more detailed analysis of the individual sites . This analysis is provided below. A2XX C/