HomeMy WebLinkAboutZone Map Amendment 99-2 - Zone Text Amendment 00-1 - Local C CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH V" 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CONNIE BROCKWAY CITY CLERK April 17, 2002 PLC Land Company Attn:William Holman 19 Corporate Plaza Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 Dear Mr. Holman: Please find enclosed the February 4, 2002 minutes of the regular meetings of the City of Huntington Beach City Council/Redevelopment Agency at which there was action taken regarding the following: (City Council) Public Hearing — Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2/Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1/Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 00-1/Tentative Tract Map No. 15690(R)/Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14(R)/Negative Declaration No. 99-18 (PLC Land Company — 8 Unit Single Family Subdivision w/s Edwards. s/o Ellis — Holly Seacliff Specific Plan) Approve Introduction of Ordinance Nos. 3536 and 3537 Sincerely, G�'O oae-�v Connie Brockway, CIVIC City Clerk Enclosure g:ffollowup/appeal/minute letter 2002.doc (Telephone:714-536-5227) Ijj je CITY OF HUIVTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CONNIE BROCKWAY February 27, 2002 CITY CLERK PLC Land Company Attn: William Holman 19 Corporate Plaza Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 Re: NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION Dear Mr. Holman: The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held Monday, February 4, 2002 took action on the following Public Hearing: Public Hearing — Zoning Map Amendment No. . 99-2/Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1/1-ocal Coastal Program Amendment No. 00-1/Tentative Tract Map No. 15690(R)/Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14(R)/Negative Declaration No. 99-18 (PLC Land Company — 8 Unit Single Family Subdivision w/s Edwards, s/o Ellis — Holly Seacliff Specific Plan) Approve Introduction of Ordinance Nos. 3536 and 3537. The City Council approved all related recommended actions as amended per the Late Communications submitted to the City Clerk's Office on February 4, 2002 (See revised & approved Findings and Conditions of Approval attached). The City Council on February 19, 2002 approved Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2 by adopting Ordinance No. 3536 and approved Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1 & Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 00-1 with findings for approval by adopting Ordinance No. 3537. THIS IS A FINAL DECISION. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT PURSUANT TO PROVISIONS OF SECTION 1094.6 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA YOU HAVE NINETY DAYS FROM THE DATE OF MAILING OF THIS NOTICE TO APPLY TO THE COURT FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact my office at (714) 536-5227. Sincerely, 41 Connie Brockway, CMC City Clerk Enclosures: Government Code 1094.6 Findings&Conditions of Approval Ord.Nos.3536 and 3537 02-04-02 Action Agenda pgs.9& 10 02-19-02 Action Agenda pg. 14 cc: Ray Silver,City Administrator—Letter Only Gail Hutton,City Attorney—Letter Only Howard Zelefsky,Planning Director W.Carvalho,Assoc.Planner g1followup/appeaMdayltr.doc (Telephone:714-536.5227) CODE OF=CIVIL PROCEDURE § 1094.6 1 1094.6. Judicial review; decisions of local agencies; petition; filing; time; record; decision and party defined; ordinance or resolution (a) Judicial review of any decision of a local agency,other than school district,as the term local agency is defined in Section 54951 of the Government Code,or of any commission,board,officer or agent thereof, may be had pursuant to Section.1094.5 of this code only if the petition for writ of mandate pursuant to such section is filed within the time limits specified in this section. (b) Any such petition shall be filed not later than the 90th day following the date onwhich the decision becomes final. If there is no provision for reconsideration of the decision, or for a written decision or written findings supporting the decision, in any applicable provision of any statute,charter,"or rule,for the purposes of this section, the decision is final on the date it is announced. If the decision is not announced at the close of the hearing,the date,time,and place of the announcement of the decision shall be announced at the hearing. If there is a provision for reconsideration,the decision is final for purposes of this section upon the expiration of the period during which 'such reconsideration can be sought; provided, that if reconsideration is sought pursuant to any such provision the decision is final for the purposes of this section on the date that reconsideration is rejected. If there is a provision for a written decision or written findings,the decision is final for purposes of this section upon the date it is maned by first-class mail, postage-prepaid, including a copy of the affidavit or•certificate of mailing,to the party seeking the writ. Subdivision (a) of Section 1013 does not apply to extend the time,following deposit in.- the mail of the decision or findings,within which a petition shall be filed. (c) The complete record of the proceedings-shall be prepared by'the local agency'or its commission, board, officer, or agent which made the decision and shall be delivered to the petitioner within 190 days after he has filed a written request therefor. The local agency may recover from the petitioner its'actual costs for transcribing or otherwise preparing'the record. Such record shall include the transcript of the proceedings, all pleadings, all notices and orders, any proposed decision by a hearing officer, the final decision,all admitted exhibits,all rejected exhibits in the possession of the local agency or its commission,- board,officer,or agent,all written evidence,and any other papers in the case. (d) If the petitioner files a request for the record as specified in subdivision(c),within 10 days after the date the decision becomes final as provided in subdivision(b),the time within which a petition pursuant to Section 1094.5 may be filed shall be extended to not later than the 30th day following the date on which the record-is either personally delivered or mailed to the petitioner or his attorney of record, if he has one: (e) As used in this section, decision means a decision subject to review pursuant to Section 1094.5, suspending,demoting,or dismissing an officer or employee,revolting, denying an application for a permit,license, or other entitlement, imposing a civil or administrative penalty, fine, charge, or cost, or denying an application for any retirement benefit or allowance. (f) In making a final decision as defined in subdivision(e), the local agency shall provide notice to the party that the time Rubin which judicial review must be sought is governed by this section. As used in this subdivision,"party"means an officer or employee who has been suspended,demoted or dismissed;"a person whose permit,license,or other entitlement has been revoked or suspended,or whose application for a permit,license,or other entitlement has been denied; or a person whose application for a retirement benefit or allowance has been denied. (g) This section shall prevail over any conflicting provision in any otherwise applicable law relating to the subject matter, unless the conflicting provision is a state or federal law which provides a_shorter statute of limitations,in which case the shorter statute of limitations shall apply. (Amended by Stats. 1983, e.818, § 3; Stats.1991,c. 1090 (A.B.1484),-§ 6; Stats.1993, c. 926 (A.B2205); § 5; Stats.1995,c.998(S.B.814),§ 1.) FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO.99-18/LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT NO. 00-1/ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. 99-2/ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 00-1 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15690 (R)/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 99-14 (R) FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL -NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 99-18: 1. The Negative Declaration No. 99-18 has been prepared in compliance with Article 6 of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) Guidelines. It was advertised and available for a public comment period of thirty (30) days. Comments received during the comment period were considered by the City Council prior to action on the Negative Declaration, Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1, Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2, Local Coastal Program Amendment, Tentative Tract Map No. 15690, and Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14. 2. Mitigation measures, incorporated into the attached conditions of approval, avoid or reduce the project's effects to a point where clearly no significant effect on the environment will occur. 3. There is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the City Council that the project, as mitigated through the conditions of approval for Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1, Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2, Local Coastal Program Amendment, Tentative Tract Map No. 15690, and Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14 will have a significant effect on the environment. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL—LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT NO. 00-1: 1. The Local Coastal Program amendment to the Huntington Beach Local Coastal Program to modify the boundary of the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan to incorporate the subject property and to establish the RL-1 zoning designation is consistent with the designation for Estate Residential cited in the 1990 Holly Seacliff Specific Plan General Plan Amendment. 2. The proposed change to the Local Coastal Program is in accordance with the policies, standards, and provisions of the Coastal Element that encourages a mix of housing opportunities that vary in price and type. The proposed land use«ill provide for future upscale residential opportunities. 3. The development conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. The proposed project will not interfere with public access opportunities provided along the Weider Regional Park, and will not impact public views. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. 99-2/ ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 00-1: 1. Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2 and Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1 to establish a zoning designation of Holly Seacliff Specific Plan (RL-1) on a 2.7 acre parcel, and to incorporate the subject property into the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan and any applicable specific plan. The proposed 1 zoning will be compatible with the adjacent estate residential zoning designations of the Holly Seacliff and Ellis Goldenwest Specific Plans. 2. In the case of a general land use provision,the zoning map and text amendment are compatible with the uses authorized in, and the standards prescribed for,the zoning district for which it is proposed. The proposed zoning will allow estate residential uses consistent with the existing land uses in the area. 3. A community need is demonstrated for the change proposed. The new zoning will allow for new single family residential development. 4. Its adoption will be in conformity with public convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice. The proposed zoning will not result in isolated or spot zoning, and will be consistent with the existing Estate Residential General Plan designation. The Holly Seacliff Specific Plan RL-1 allows up to four units per gross acre which is consistent with the Estate Residential General Plan designation. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL -TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15690 (R): 1. Tentative Tract Map No. 15690 (R) for a subdivision of approximately 2.7 acres into eight(8) residential lots with two lettered lots for landscaping purposes is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element designation of Estate Residential on the subject property, or any applicable specific plan, or other applicable provisions of this Code. The proposed subdivision will be compatible in size and intensity with the adjacent residential developments in the Holly Seacliff and Ellis Goldenwest Specific Plan areas. 2. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of development. The subdivision will involve grading that will provide sufficient rear yards for the eight single family homes without impacting the adjacent Wieder Regional Park site. 3. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not cause serious health problems or substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The eight lot subdivision will have no adverse impacts on any fish or wildlife or their habitats. 4. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision unless alternative easements, for access or for use, will be provided. All necessary easements will be provided with the creation of the parcels and the development of the site. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 99-14 (R): 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14 (R) for the development of a site with greater than a three foot grade differential between the high and low points will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. Based upon the conditions imposed,the development will be designed to minimize impacts from grading, and will not be detrimental to the surrounding properties. 2 2. The conditional use permit will be compatible with surrounding uses based on proposed zoning and development standards. Any future development of the site will be required to comply with identical development standards set forth in the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan. 3. The proposed eight lot subdivision will comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. In addition, any specific condition required for the proposed use in the district in which it would be located Any future development will be required to comply with the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan unless separate variances are approved by the City of Huntington Beach. 4. The granting of the conditional use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan. It is consistent with the Land Use Element designation of Estate Residential on the subject property CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15690 (R): 1. The tentative map received and dated January 8, 2002 shall be the approved layout. 2. Prior to submittal of the final map to the Public Works Department for processing and approval by the City Council, the following shall be required: a. The Settlement and Release Agreement pertaining to the PLC lawsuit of the City's denial of entitlements associated with the original 10 lot subdivision shall be approved by the City Council. b. The Affordable Housing Agreement Plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. The agreement shall provide for affordable housing on-site or off-site. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of the first building permit for the tract. The contents of the agreement shall include the following: 1) Minimum 15 percent of the units (2 units) shall be affordable to families of moderate income level (less than 120% of Orange County median) for a period of thirty years. 2) A detailed description of the type, size, location and phasing of the affordable units. 3) If affordable units (new or rehabilitate) are off-site,they must be under the full control of the applicant. 4) The affordable units shall be constructed prior to or concurrent with the primary project. Final approval (occupancy) of the first residential unit in the tract shall be contingent upon the completion and public availability, or evidence of the applicant's reasonable progress towards attainment of completion, of the affordable units. c. The grade on the sloped landscaped areas adjacent to the park shall not be modified without the approval of the Planning Director. A covenant restricting the grading and redesign of the sloped condition shall be recorded on the properties. A copy of the covenant shall be reviewed by the City Attorney prior to recordation. A copy of the recorded documents shall be submitted to the Planning Department for inclusion in the Tract file. 3. The following conditions shall be completed prior to recordation of the final map unless otherwise stated. Bonding may be substituted for construction in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. (PW) a. A reproducible mylar copy and a print of the recorded map shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works at the time of recordation. (PV ) b. The engineer or surveyor preparing the final map shall comply with Sections 7-9-330 and 7-9- 337 of the Orange County Subdivision Code and Orange County Subdivision Manual, Subarticle 18 for the following items: 1) Tie the boundary of the map into the Horizontal Control System established by the County Surveyor. 2) Provide a digital-graphics file of said map to the County of Orange. (PNV) c. Provide a digital-graphics file of said map to the City per the following design criteria: 1) Design Specification: a) Digital data shall be full size (1:1) and in compliance with the California coordinate system —STATEPLANE Zone 6 (Lambert Conformal Conic projection),NAD 83 datum in accordance with the County of Orange Ordinance 3809. b) Digital data shall have double precision accuracy (up to fifteen significant digits). c) Digital data shall have units in US FEET. d) A separate drawing file shall be submitted for each individual sheet. e) Digital data shall be in compliance with the Huntington Beach Standard Sheets, drawing names, pen color and layering conventions. f) Feature compilation shall include, but shall not be limited to: Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APN), street addresses and street names with suffix. 2) File Format and Media Specification: a) Shall be in compliance with the following file format: • AutoCAD (version 13 or later) drawing file: _.DWG b) Shall be in compliance with the following media type: • CD Recordable (CD-R) 650 Megabytes d. The following shall be shown as a dedication to the City of Huntington Beach on the Final Map: 1) "A" Street for public street purposes. 2) A 2.00 foot wide public utility easement as shown on said map (7 ft.parkways or less). 3) The water system and appurtenances as shown on the improvement plans. 4 4) The sewer system and appurtenances as shown on the improvement plans. 5) The easement for sewer purposes as shown on said map. (PW ) e. All vehicular access rights to Edwards Street shall be released and relinquished to the City of Huntington Beach except at locations approved by the City Council. (PW ) f. All improvement securities (Faithful Performance, Labor& Material and Monument Bonds) and Subdivision Agreement shall be posted with the Public Works Department and approved as to form by the City Attorney. (PW) g. A Certificate of Insurance shall be filed with the Public Works Department and approved as to form by the City Attorney. (PW ) h. The Final Map shall be recorded with the County of Orange prior to issuance of building permits. (PW ). i. All Public Works fees shall be paid. (PWt) j. The area covered by this tentative map shall be annexed to the Reservoir Hill Assessment District in order to provide Zone 2 water service. All necessary studies and processing fees shall be paid by the Subdivider. (PW ) k. Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2 and Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1 shall be approved by the City Council. 1. The subdivider shall work with the Department of Public Works to establish a fund to provide for the on-going maintenance costs of Lots A and B (landscaping). 4. The following conditions shall be completed prior to issuance of a grading permit: a. A Grading Plan,prepared by a Licensed Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval. This plan shall also include an erosion and silt control plan for all water runoff during construction and site preparation work. (PW ) b. A Street Improvement Plan, prepared by a Licensed Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval. The following improvements shall be shown on the plan: 1) Curb and gutter, sidewalk, street pavement, signing, striping and street lighting for"A" Street. 2) An ADA compliant access ramp at the northwest and southwest corners of Edwards Street and "A" Street. 3) Sewage collection system including individual sewer laterals for each lot. 4) Water distribution system connecting to the existing 12-inch main in Edwards Street. 5) A new domestic water service and meter for each lot shall be installed per Water Division standards, and sized to meet the minimum requirements set by the California Plumbing Code (CPC). The water service shall be a minimum of 1-inch in size. 5 6) A separate water service, meter and backflow protection device shall be installed to serve reclaimed water for common area landscaping (Lots "A" and`B"). (PW) c. In accordance with NPDES requirements, a"Water Quality Management Plan" shall be prepared by a Civil or Environmental Engineer. "Best Management Practices"shall be identified and incorporated into the design. (PW) d. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered engineer. This analysis shall include on- site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations for grading, chemical and fill properties, retaining walls, streets, and utilities. (PW) e. A Landscape and Irrigation Plan, prepared by a Licensed Landscape Architect, shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval by the Park, Tree and Landscape Division. The Developer shall submit irrigation demands to ensure proper irrigation demands to ensure proper irrigation service sizing. Plans for temporary erosion control on slopes at rear and sides of lots shall be included. (PW) f. If soil remediation is required, a remediation plan shall be submitted to the Planning, Public Works and Fire Departments for review and approval in accordance with City Specifications No. 431-92 and the conditions of approval. The plan shall include methods to minimize remediation- related impacts on the surrounding properties; details on how all drainage associated with the remediation efforts shall be retained on site and no wastes or pollutants shall escape the site; and shall also identify wind barriers around remediation equipment. (PW) g. The name and phone number of an on-site field supervisor hired by the developer shall be submitted to the Departments of Planning and Public Works. In addition, clearly visible signs shall be posted on the perimeter of the site every 250 feet indicating who shall be contacted for information regarding this development and any construction/grading-related concerns. This contact person shall be available immediately to address any concerns or issues raised by adjacent property owners during the construction activity. He/She will be responsible for ensuring compliance with the conditions herein, specifically, grading activities,truck routes, construction hours, noise, etc. Signs shall include the applicant's contact number, City contact(Construction Manager(714) 536-5431) regarding grading and construction activities, and"I-800-CUTSMOG" in the event there are concerns regarding fugitive dust and compliance with AQMD Rule No. 403. ("0 h. The applicant shall notify all property owners and tenants within 300 feet of the perimeter of the property of a tentative grading schedule at least 30 days prior to such grading. (PW) i. The developer shall coordinate the development of a truck haul route with the Department of Public Works if the import or export of material is required. This plan shall include the approximate number of truck trips and the proposed truck haul routes. It shall specify the hours in which transport activities can occur and methods to mitigate construction-related impacts to adjacent residents. These plans must include a truck haul route diagram and be submitted for approval to the Department of Public Works Transportation Division. No fees are required for such haul route permit. (PW) 6 J. The applicant's grading/erosion control plan shall abide by the provisions of AQMD's Rule 403 as related to fugitive dust control. (PW) k. Blockwall/fencing plans (including a site plan, section drawings, and elevations depicting the height and material of all retaining walls,walls, and fences) consistent with the grading plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department. The plans shall identify materials, seep holes and drainage. 5. During grading operations,the following shall be complied with: a. Due to the proximity of the site to a known archeological site, grading activities during remedial site grading work shall be monitored by an archeologist. (Mitigation Measure) b. Water trucks will be utilized on the site and shall be available to be used throughout the day during site grading to keep the soil damp enough to prevent dust being raised by the operations. (PW) c. All haul trucks shall arrive at the site no earlier than 8:00 a.m. or leave the site no later than 5:00 p.m., and shall be limited to Monday through Friday only. (PW) d. Wet down the areas that are to be graded or that are being graded, in the late morning and after work is completed for the day. (PW) e. The construction disturbance area shall be kept as small as possible. (PW) f. All haul trucks shall be covered or have water applied to the exposed surface prior to leaving the site to prevent dust from impacting the surrounding areas. (PW) g. Prior to leaving the site, all haul trucks shall be washed off on-site on a gravel surface to prevent dirt and dust from leaving the site and impacting public streets. (PW) h. Comply with appropriate sections of AQMD Rule 403, particularly to minimize fugitive dust and noise to surrounding areas. (PW) i. Wind barriers shall be installed along the perimeter of the site. (PW) j. Remediation operations, if required, shall be performed in stages concentrating in single areas at a time to minimize the impact of fugitive dust and noise on the surrounding areas. (PW) k. Construction equipment shall be maintained in peak operating condition to reduce emissions. 1. Use low sulfur(0.5%) fuel by weight for construction equipment. m. Truck idling shall be prohibited for periods longer than 10 minutes. n. Attempt to phase and schedule activities to avoid high ozone days first stage smog alerts. o. Discontinue operation during second stage smog alerts. 6. The Departments of Planning, Public Works and Fire are responsible for compliance with all conditions of approval herein as noted after each condition. The Planning Director and Public Works Director shall be notified in writing if any changes to tract map are proposed as a result of the plan check process. Permits shall not be issued until the Planning Director and Public Works Director have reviewed and approved the proposed changes for conformance with the intent of the City Council's action and the conditions herein. If the proposed changes are of a substantial nature, an amendment to the original entitlement may be required pursuant to the HBZSO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL—CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 99-14 (R): 1. The site plan received and dated January 8, 2002 shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following modifications: a. The site plan, floor plans, building elevations, and fencing plans shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Commission. Any deviation from development standards specified in the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan shall be subject to review and approval of a variance by the Planning Commission. b. Lots 3-6 shall be provided with one additional off-street parking space pursuant to the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan for lots with 30 ft. frontages. c. Depict all utility apparatus, such as but not limited to back flow devices and Edison transformers on the site plan. Utility meters shall be screened from view from public rights-of-way. Electric transformers in a required front or street side yard shall be enclosed in subsurface vaults. Backflow prevention devices shall be prohibited in the front yard setback and shall be screened from view. (Code Requirement) d. Depict all gas meters, water meters, electrical panels, air conditioning units, mailbox facilities and similar items on the site plan and elevations. If located on a building,they shall be architecturally designed into the building to appear as part of the building. They shall be architecturally compatible with the building and non-obtrusive, not interfere with sidewalk areas and comply with required setbacks. e. If outdoor lighting is included, energy saving lamps shall be used. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties and shall be shown on the site plan and elevations. 8 2. Prior to submittal for building permits, the following shall be completed: a. Zoning entitlement conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on one of the first three pages of all the working drawing sets used for issuance of building permits (architectural, structural, electrical,mechanical and plumbing) and shall be referenced in the sheet index. The minimum font size utilized for printed text shall be 12 point. b. All Fire Department requirements shall be noted on the building plans. (FD) c. An engineering geologist shall be engaged to submit a report indicating the ground surface acceleration from earth movement for the subject property. All structures within this development shall be constructed in compliance with the g-factors as indicated by the geologist's report. Calculations for footings and structural members to withstand anticipated g-factors shall be submitted to the City for review prior to the issuance of building permits. (Code Requirement) d. Floor plans shall depict natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at the location of clothes dryers; natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters and central heating units. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits, the following shall be completed: a. Applicant shall modify the sewer alignment on the fire station site per the City Engineer's direction. (PW) b. All landscape planting, irrigation and maintenance shall comply with the City Arboricultural and Landscape Standards and Specifications. (PW) c. The Consulting Arborist(approved by the City Landscape Architect) shall review the final landscape tree-planting plan and approve in writing the selection and locations proposed for new trees and the protection measures and locations of existing trees to remain. Existing trees to remain shall also be addressed by said Arborist with recommendations/requirements for protection during construction. Said Arborist report shall be incorporated onto the Landscape Architect's plans as construction notes and/or construction requirements. The report shall include the Arborist's name, certificate number and the Arborist's wet signature on the final plan. (PW) d. An Automatic sprinkler and fire alarm system shall be installed throughout if the building gross square footage exceeds 5000 sq. ft. Shop drawings shall be submitted and approved by the Fire Department prior to system installation. (FD) e. Fire hydrants shall be installed prior to combustible construction. Prior to installation, shop drawings shall be submitted to the Public Works Department and approved by the Fire Department. Indicate hydrant locations and fire department connections. (FD) f. Fire access roads shall be provided in compliance -Mth City Specification No. 401. Include the Circulation Plan and dimensions of all access roads. (FD) 9 i g. Submit a Fire Protection Plan in compliance with City Specification No. 426 for Fire Department approval. (FD) h. The project shall comply with all provisions of the HBFC and City specification 422, Well Abandonment. (FD) i. The project shall comply with all provisions of the HBMC Section 17.04.085 and City Specification 429, Methane District Building Permit Requirements. (FD) j. Installation and/or removal of underground flammable or combustible liquid storage tanks shall comply with Orange County Environmental Health and HBFD requirements. Treatment areas may require conformance to City Specification No. 431, Gas Fired Appliances. (FD) k. Address numbers shall be installed to comply with City Specification No. 428. (FD) 1. Street names shall be approved by the Fire Department. Please refer to City Specification No. 409. (FD) 4. The structure(s) cannot be occupied, the final building permit(s) cannot be approved, and utilities cannot be released for the first residential unit until the following has been completed: a. A section of existing curb, gutter and sidewalk along Edwards Street must be removed and replaced. Existing street tree(s)must be inspected by the City of Huntington Beach, Park, Trees and Landscape Inspector during removal of concrete and prior to construction of"A" Street improvements. Tree replacement or root/tree protection, will be specified upon the inspection of the root system. (PW) b. All landscape irrigation and planting installation shall be certified to be in conformance to the City approved landscape plans by the Landscape Architect of record in written form to the City Landscape Architect prior to the final landscape inspection and approval. (PW) c. Applicant shall provide the City with Microfilm copies (in City format) and CD (AutoCAD only) copy of complete City approved landscape construction drawings as stamped"Permanent File Copy"prior to starting landscape work. Copies shall be given to the City Landscape Architect for permanent City record. (PW) d. A covenant prohibiting the removal of the open view fencing along the perimeter of the west and north property lines shall be recorded with the County Recorder's Office. The covenant shall be submitted to the Planning Department, and shall be reviewed as to form by the City Attorney's Office. A copy of the recorded covenant shall be filed with the Planning Department. 5. Prior to final building permit inspection and approval of the first residential unit, the following shall be completed: a. Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein shall be accomplished and verified by the Planning Department. j I 10 b. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. 6. The Planning Director ensures that all conditions of approval herein are complied with. The Planning Director shall be notified in writing if any changes to the site plan, elevations and floor plans are proposed as a result of the plan check process. Building permits shall not be issued until the Planning Director has reviewed and approved the proposed changes for conformance with the intent of the City Council's action and the conditions herein. If the proposed changes are of a substantial nature, an amendment to the original entitlement may be required pursuant to the HBZSO. 7. Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14 (R) shall not become effective until Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1 and Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2 have been approved by the City Council and are in effect. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS—TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15690 (R)/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 99-14 (R): 1. Tentative Tract Map No. 15690 (R) and Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14 (R) shall not become effective until the Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1 and Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2 have been approved by the City Council and are in effect. 2. Tentative Tract Map No. 15690 (R) and Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14 (R) shall become null and void unless exercised within two years of the date of final zoning text amendment and zoning map amendment approval or such extension of time as may be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. 3. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Tentative Tract Map No. 15690 (R) and Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14 (R), pursuant to a public hearing for revocation, if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance or Municipal Code occurs. 4. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, Building Division, and Fire Department as well as applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards, except as noted herein. 5. Standard landscape code requirements apply (Chapter 232 of the ZSO). (PW) 6. The Water Ordinance No. 14.52,the"Water Efficient Landscape Requirements" apply for projects with 2500 square feet of landscaping or larger. (PW) 7. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid prior to map recordation. (PW) 8. Traffic impact fees shall be paid at a rate of$150 per daily trip ($14,400). (PW) 9. An Encroachment Permit is required for all work within the City's right-of-way. (PW) i 11 10. Park and recreation in-lieu fees shall be paid, or accrued credits assigned, prior to Council approval of the final map. 11. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of$43 for the posting of the Notice of Determination at the County of Orange Clerk's Office. The check shall be made out to the County of Orange and submitted to the Planning Department within two (2) days of the City Council's action. 12. Construction shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. 13. All landscaping shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner, and in conformance with the HBZSO. Prior to removing or replacing any landscaped areas, check with the Departments of Planning and Public Works for Code requirements. Substantial changes may require approval by the Planning Commission. i 12 ORDINANCE NO. 3536 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ZONING AND SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE BY ESTABLISHING A HOLLY SEACLIFF SPECIFIC PLAN(SP-9) ZONING DESIGNATION ON REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF EDWARDS STREET, SOUTH OF ELLIS AVENUE (ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. 99-2) WHEREAS,pursuant to the State Planning and Zoning Law, the Huntington Beach Planning Commission and Huntington Beach City Council have held separate public hearings relative to Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2, wherein both bodies have carefully considered all information presented at said hearings, and after due consideration of the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission and all evidence presented to said City Council, the City Council finds that such zone change is proper, and consistent with the General Plan, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. That certain real property, generally located on the west side of Edwards Street, south of Ellis Avenue, and more particularly described in the legal description attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein,is hereby zoned Holly Seacliff Specific Plan. (District Map No. 38) SECTION 2. The Director of Planning is hereby directed to amend Sectional District Map 38Z of the Huntington Beach Zoning& Subdivision Ordinance so as to reflect the changes contained in this ordinance. The Director of Planning is further directed to file the amended map. A copy of such map, as amended, shall be available for inspection in the Office of the City Clerk. PDA:2002 Ordinances:ZMA99-2 Ord.No.3536 SECTION 3 This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19thday of February , 2002. Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk 00-'�4-°2- ,4,City Attorney ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: a City Adm strator "iyaorof ing 2 PDA:2002 Ordinances:ZNIA99-2 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION Ord.No.3536 FOR TENTATTYE TRACT K -%P 15690 PLC ANNEXATION TO CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE =I1 WEST, "SAN' BERNARDINO BASE -AND MERIDIAN, IN THE UNINCORPORATED -TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY, OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON -THE MAP RECORDED'IN BOOK 51, PAGE 13 OF MISCELLANEOUS KAPS IN THE•;OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY,MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE NORTHMLY LINE OF PARCEL 1 AS SHOWN ON THE MAP FILED LET HOOK 42, PAGE 25 OF PARCEL'-k APS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, SAID PONNT BEWO ON A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND WESTERLY 40.00 FEET FROM THE EAST LIE,OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE NORTH 89°32159" WEST•..415.00 FEET,AL01YG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL l;THENCE NORTH 00°16'06"EAST 130.00 FEET;THENCE NORTH 16031'52" EAST 50.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 45'58'31"- FAST 190.00 FEET; 'THENCE SOUTH 89°43'54" EAST 265.00 FEET -TO SAID\AFOREMENTIONED LINE BEING PARALLEL WITH AND WESTERLY 40.00 FEET FROM THE EAST LINTE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SEC 0.34; 'THENCE SOUTH 00"1606" RAT 312.00 FEET ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE TO T.C-POINT OF BEGINNlNCj,. CONTAINING AN AREA OF 2.71 ACRES,MORE ORLESS. F ESV �4 im C�L1� VWDEN & LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR SOCIATES TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 15690 OF PLC ANNEXATION TO CITY OF HUMVGTON BEACH ctvu r:RVIYoP-5 W.O.No.0979-396.3 Dalto 7/1/99 IM17 C01Ax.SUITE s:c•nvtxa.CA s..s:: Bag,D.C. Chk. D,W. 1 or I 77V:CC QTTO rAX.Md-UII Ord.No.3536 .(!�J'�1 J N ,� ' Il n 1/4'1 Sea. .1¢ C,aus AM" 5W L4, L. 34. N S- W TENTATIVE !c TRACT No. 15G90 • N U076 r:6• 2.71 AG. 130DO, S EiY L2, 6w V4, W. 34 N b9'32 a�T W 415.{10' MLY LM, FARM 1 f 149. 42/Z5 A Of ESS 19#d2 t E;L 4-X41 Y LEWL Def-MMCH FOR N*4,SSOCIATES mTATivr rwr Ka sago 19012 CQTAN' SC1I'� 210, �E, Cl QM4 W.O. No 087q=a-3 Dc4e 4m (fl<9) QQO—Glib FAX: 6e0-0413 r.._.00c Sheatl �Qf z— I Ord. No. 3536 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, CONNIE BROCKWAY,the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City,do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven;that the foregoing ordinance was read to said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 4th day of February,2002, and was again read to said City Council at a reLyular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of February,2002, and was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council. AYES: Dettloff,Bauer, Cook, Boardman, Winchall NOES: None ABSENT: Green, Houchen ABSTAIN: None I,Connie Brockway CITY CLERK of the City of Huntington Beach and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council,do hereby certify that a synopsis of this ordinance has been published in the Indeprndrnt on ,2002 In accordance with the City Charter of said Cir• City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk Connie Brockway,City Clerk of the City Council of the City Dewty City Clerk of Huntington Beach, California i ORDINANCE NO. 3537 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HOLLY SEACLIFF SPECIFIC PLAN TO INCORPORATE REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF EDWARDS STREET APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET SOUTH OF ELLIS AVENUE (ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 00-1) WHEREAS,pursuant to the California State Planning and Zoning Law, the Huntington Beach Planning Commission and Huntington Beach City Council have held separate, duly noticed public hearings to consider whether or not to amend the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance by amending the boundary of the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan to incorporate approximately 2.7 acres of real property; and After due consideration of the findings and recommendation of the Planning Commission and all other evidence presented, the City Council finds that the aforesaid amendment is proper and consistent with the General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1. That the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan is hereby amended to incorporate approximately 2.7 acres of real property, generally located on the west side of Edwards Street, south of Ellis Avenue, and more particularly described in the legal description attached hereto as Exhibit"A" and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein. SECTION 2. The Director of Planning is hereby directed to amend the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan to incorporate the changes shown in the legislative draft materials (text and exhibits) attached hereto as Exhibit"B" and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein. i 1 PDA:2002 Ordinances:=00-1 Rls 00-582 Ord.No.3537 SECTION 3. That this ordinance shalt become effective thirty(30) days after its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of February , 2002. /aim" Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: /- 73- City Clerk o-2 •26-02 G City Attorney ATTEST: APP OVED AS TO FORM: City AdiTinistrator rector. of Pl ng 2 PDA:2002 Ordinances:=00-1 Rls 00-582 EXHIBIT A LEG_ L DESCRIPTION Ord.No.3537 FOR TENTATIVE TRACT XAP 15690 PLC ANNEXATION TO CITY OF HUN'ITNGTON BEACH BMNG A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP S SOUTH, RANGE `tl WEST, SAN• BERNARDINO BASE 'A-ID MERIDIAN, IN THE UNINCORPORATED. -TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY. OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFOMIA, AS SHOWN ON THE MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 13 OF MISCELLANEOUS NEAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY,MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNI O AT A POINT IN THE NORTHERLY LM OF PARCEL 1 AS SHOWN ON THE MAP FILED LN BOOK 42, PAGE 25 OF PARCEL MAPS IN THE OFF+CE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, SAID POINT BEING ON A LINE PARALLEL VAM AND WESTERLY 40.00 FEET FROM THE.EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE NORTH 99632159" WEST 415.00 FEET ALONd TIM NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL l;THENCE NORTH 00°16'06"EAST 130.00 FEET,THENCE NORTH 16031'51" EAST 50.00 FEET; THENd-NORTH 45*58-31" FAST 190.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°43'54% FAST 265.00 FEET TO SAID AFOREMENTIONED LINE BEING PARALLEL WITH AND WESTERLY 40.00 FEET FROM THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECIZON'-34, THENCE SOUTH 00°16'060.WEST 312.00 PEST ALON0 SAM PARALLEL LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. C06NTAMG AN AREA OF 2.71 ACRES,MORE OR LESS. FEW 19�2 - ,� V% er CA��E VWDEN & LEGAL DESCRIPTIONFOR SOIATES TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 15690 OF PLC ANNEXATION TO CITY OF HUNTLNcrTON BEACH CWM 5V%VIYOM W.O.No. 0979-396.3 D119 7/l/99 U011 COWAN.SU M, :10•rnYINP.CA 9I5:: Bug.D.C. Cbl D.W. S�eat 1 of 1 71414,t-MIC FAX:M4-0411 Ord.No.3537 A. �^ +�h`J IHW 114, BE0.'34 Claus AYE'" 5W L4, SEC. SW h T4354 W tin I TMATIYF TRACT NO. 15G90 H 001606, E 2.71 AG: rtr try, " 8q325r W 4 540 SW ?l4. 5f�. 34 NLY Of, PARGE! 2 � FM. 4ZI5 616. O�ESS 16#02 t Eno AMEN YM TO-A COMM A . y . L=teampnoH rope SSOCIATES mTAnvf WTxo. IWO ISQ12 C07AN- F= 210. nMa, Cl 92614 W.O. No 087q=3N-3 `71V9 (649)-eff -Clio TAX: M-0418 2— Ord.No.3537 I EXHIBIT B I Ord.No.3537 C. Project Area Description Locatiodt 5 The Specific Plan covers-565-acres located in the central portion of the City of Huntington B�ach as depicted in Exhibit 1 (Vicuuty Map). A legal description of properties incl%ded in the Specific Plan project area may be found in Section V. Present land uses surrounding the site include Huntington Central Park,Ocean View Mobile Estateeand industrial uses to the north;residential and office uses to the cast; the Huntingtoh Beach Civic Center,Huntington Beach High.School, Seacliff Country Club and residential uses to the south; and the Bolsa Chica lowlands to the west. The Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan excludes properties contained in the previously adopted Ellis-Goldenwest Specific Plan. Exhibit 2 illustrates the existing zoning within the Specific Plan area. Regional access to the project site is'provided from the San Diego Freeway(I- 405)directly from the Goldenwest interchange. Pacific Coast Highway(State Highway 1)provides access from coastal areas to the north and south. Local access is provided via Edwards,Goldenwest,Gothard and Main Streets and Ellis, Garfield and Yorktown Avenues. D. Planning Background There are a number of previous approvals related to land use regulations affecting the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan Area. These previous.approvals include:_- 1. The Ellis-Goldenwest Specific Plan,approved by the Huntington Beach City Council through its adoption of Ordinance No:-2998 on June 26, 1989. (Not a part of the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan) 2. . Final Environmental Impact Report No. 88-2 prepared for the Ellis- Goldenwest Specific Plan(adopted on May I, 1989,by Resolution No. 6022). 3. Holly-Seacliff General Plan Amendment No. 89-1 approved by the City Council through its adoption of Resolution No. 6098 on January 8 .._1990. 4. Final Environmental Impact Report No. 89-1 prepared for the Holly- Seacliff General Plan Amendment(adopted on January 8, 1990,by Resolution No. 6097). 5. Holly-Seacliff Development Agreement No. 90-1 (adopted on November 5, 1990, by Ordinance No. 3080). I-2 (hssp98) Ord.No.3537 �O to cc C_ rn H .f, p SLATER AVENUE t9 cr 3 - a N 3 TALBERT AVENUE 3 CENTRAL La W PARK O �T O ELUS AVENUE :.. •.•:{:�is ....,:::•}::•:• +: ::~; ::�:�:• :::: GARflELD AVENUE Ne .s` YORKTOWN AVENUE .e :f: H.B.• '!�, ':�:;:`;:;•.'•%' HIGH `CMC 7 SCHOOL CENTER AVENUE SEACUFF ADAMS AVENUE COUNTRY CLUB us cc z �1 H < O m C`0 O N C z usO m cc cc y�c bye EXHIBIT VICINITY MA CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH MR n u•o ; r w cN• MI lti .urrtoxcet c0 i w•co 1.... ».. �� Mt•a RA-0 i!{t��l{{:: :'{..�:M: I RAO•CD { �'� I.. ..►.!' � M2-0 1 w•o {' ELIIS•GOLOENWEST SPECIFIC PLAN 111 1 .r RA-0 or ; �. t r�•t MI d . , �•r y c J 1 RA 01-C - -_ {. MI.O w• ., /IJ. MI•cl t orcc-cz �r mr 'ram' z _ 1- L �_ R2 oww' •-%. - -�� •Ft4-0 I CI 0 RA-01-C MI f o Mt :1rR MI-A j:r l� 2-01 b o RA-0 _ nz ,�, 10 .• i..• J`:;r,•. l,� :n.: u ) Ma I ray' Jlp. MI :1'-•�((,• �,,y'•'•1�. ��;� •'1 .,\ :��'� :�.c'L'il I ..• 1-,' 11• ) r.uA r It If 1��J ./.)1)N .! . �A •nl ' V1 ~•- r-.-wr r wrr �M'A..Aw.:.pfi,1��-.rw«�.w'l ROS-0 nl ! '� nt•o•ro t =I.r ({{�,. -•' '; ': ;it` '�`t� ' _...� no RI C2.0-CD �. C2-0 •�• ' ;t''=%LLLLLLt{ ;;:�;5':' ; I..::•r J �r`° `ct! �rar..t Y �;r. • ..._«x". it ''"ti:y. �r\,' 1,1�'.r 1� ro rar•a• ...wt{_.Grlr.— f Nalf�' ..IjI r +to ra C2-0-CD OP•0CD 1-0.0•ro- • 114-01 ~"•a.��ir 7!l utoo•ctt �•., R�01! 'MM� r�. ... CF-C • r { is '-�:: • ! . r CF-E-CD {{.grww J 11>•0-Co K;i' O '{ j f rl�t I00•tl �i A' !�j_ -i'li�i vn..v►awtl p 1, Yl RO so LCF-E-CD !1/0.1/I I Fl:�n r41 Z ;:✓E ;�!�t^r�:;-� \ ... �..».. EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH EXISTING ZON114r .M_._n_M n � � � n n/,� nn � �n I Ij 0LL U -� L9FF /AIRl� � �lr���U�llV�' lPl�G�;1IN tJIpglllII I I !� L E G E N I? ! M,I LO*top" AgRINNAII Q IOMMM4P/11tffNMhA►f . NwrM q}4�b, I(�� 1r•ANwn I.low LOiNNM;lII11f110[I f 3,w ,mU6,,11tMOfNiMI q•MM 1.1 \ ', �.MAfN;NNAL NNMTI — ' •.rwN I nl-0 M!\ Q wAffefrnawANt M•, RU1 ctUs•aOLOENwRtT � I�-� .. _ aKCWIG PLAN AREA AMQ a/fNNAq r 4 n PLANNING AI1lA 1405 t (•) PLANNING UNIT 14 Rmli in Q NfIf NA00N000►ANNf 09 1 ri 7 •. A{a�NiW/lYp !li7RliOfiA� • .w ��� yv nM _ , �..-.... r1. 040 , ��J► / Illylf .I_. I \ II RL.3 1 M � i µp .r J , AOlMrW1t�'• , r o a •r EXHIBIT 3 0 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH OENERAL PLAN 'M L,C1,1" u (s AA CL OF ^ Re. � S8Prr.-Cc0 F UCH PLAN Qtoamii i i ��� TABLE 1 HOLLY-SEACLIFF SPECIFIC PLAN Ord.No.3537 LAND USE TABLE PLANNING I. ':PLANNING-• LAND.USE CATEGORY:-'-:- GROSS, TOTAL MAXIMUM. .AVERAGE DEV, . -tAREi4.- UNIT: ACRES UNITS: ':,GROSS::_ GROSS STANDS. :a - - r•. ''_ - _ .DENSITY: DENSITY (PAGE) 1 1-1 RESIDENTIAL-LOW DENSITY 1 -6-9 •15 4 Q-r.b 111-10 1-2 AESIDENTIAL-LOW DENSITY 1 26 90 4 3.5 111-10 1-3 RESIDENTIAL-LOW DENSITY 1 16 55 4. 3.4 111-10 1-4 OPEN`SPACE 16 I11-32 SUBTOTAL ` 64 160 II 11-1 RESIDENTIAL-LOW DENSITY 3 62• 310 7 4.1 111-16 11-2 RESIDENTIAL-MEDIUM DENSITY 40 415 15 11.0 111-20 II-3 RESIDENTIAL-MEDIUM DENSITY 34• 390 15 13.0 111-20 II-4 RESIDENTIAL-MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY 9 170 25 16.6 III-23 RESIDENTIAL-MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY 4 75 25 18.8 111-23 RESIDENTIAL-MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY 4 75 25 18.8 111-23 RESIDENTIAL-MEDIUMHIGH DENSITY 6 100 25 16.6 111-23 INDUSTRIAL 32 III-31 191 1,535 IE11-7 RESIDENTIAL-MEDIUM DENSITY 19 285 15 15.0 11I-20 - RESIDENTIAL-LOW DENSITY 2 105 397 7 3.8 I11-13 111-3/4 RESIDENTIAL-LOW DENSITY 3 21 86 5 5 III-16 111-517 RESIDENTIAL-LOW DENSITY 3 26•• 119 5 5 111-16 111-6 COMMERCIAL 11 111-31 III-B OPEN SPACE 16 _ ' III-32 SUBTOTAL 198 887 IV 1V-1 RESIDENTIAL-MEDIUM DENSITY 16 155 15 9.7 111-20 fV-2 RESIDENTIAL-MEDIUM DENSITY 8 120 15 15.0 111-20 IV-3 INDUSTRIAL 9\ 111-31 N-4 MIXED DEVELOPMENT 53 165 25 14.4 III-25 IV-5 INDUSTRIAL 22 111-31 IV-6 COMMERCIAL 4 111-31 SUBTOTAL 112 44,'0 TOTAL 565 3,02 Includes 4-acre Neighborhood Park. Includes 5-acre Neighborhood Park. NSF Ord.No.3537 �.,V =V-VAC ■ E i ! C O . I-2 t RL-1 y 90 DU 3 1-4 a ' 9 � W OS 16 AC -- -- t-3 ' RL-1 55 DU vM� COASTAL ZONE/ ! t BOUNDARY- NOT'E- See ahiblt 1 O for Lsed=pe Legend. EXHIBIT 4 PLANNING AREA I CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH DEVELOPMENT PLAN LEGEND �rM1AtwMr�lwIM�.Www4 JAW •�wM�nMIMrMMMW IM�MMw y0M11�IN10111�MN/A1 •Iw.MdM� �rW Aiww IW M Myth{ wM1AMMMr..� MI/w�wwMww�MAhMM.�.M wa■.w�wwwMMrw nw amNow o"CONMM"OtPAT , » .L......w.. nl.l cwsoaSPEMICZ"AN`T ..w+.A. (Md,.l A..•M MU M M+Av •Wr.sht" ww Aww MMI M Nwd1 NMI 05 � � M1.Mw.MA�N.1r M.yMM+wI nL-1 1 RMH ww�rwuar"� OS pM C' 0 �.N.Ybww f RLd ( RM 09 � RL.J _ am pL. \ j MD MAJUL l4ohlowe "w* a EXHIBIT 8 W CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CIRCULATION PLAN PrJOLLV-8E"QC�L0FFARE1% "CR94 P E C UIF0C P L A M } • • � •• •i * •NNE• c"I set UAIL s•�<••'v y'7+ i r• w••u• CtA/1 1041 NAIL ? r' ♦ r1. �,'�/ypq� ���.y��� yto 1 (.!i• S '�S,J �� :ItII111Id1 �:1t17LLIC • 1 .� :1 �_.� _ © IoYI(IIIAN IIAIL LANAI PAN N61 HCMAIM NIA .:YSiI.S `Y:•< I 1 ; :;iju:i:i•' ICING COIttDOf �'v/.•: r�: RM IIANt►onAf10N/ t .*Yr ;ff s4a EUIO-CoLDENWEtT 1 I�• y. �L�1 PAN tm At 10I1ANN NI EPEMIC PLAN * tlCttAlpN 11(MIILI ••;'' ?v:<. / AREA Ne0 NN >r kkRM } s St�.ti i�ri: 1 MH +' 1•,.�; 861 am 17� RLa C 1 am .74 3:'• ' RM t �w. •x ,V�y,� RL� c i SI, i Mo � 1 4 COAILIAL YM"4 fOIN D'AM- . a Wool" , • r ,�� EXHIBIT 9 °a OPEN SPACE o CITY OF HUNTINGTONN BEACH can n ran M A 1 0 LI'-,V cr-' ° ����Irtr l;,tiwu ° cJU� t��li�2�� trL��" u� d!�elllll I I 1 ^ L EGEND %I � ., .�.,. E3 - RL•7 G RM . , 41 �cN7a►uN / AMAa ' .\ ( RM N. 03 MR RM". �.. _ RMH •? nM _��•1_ RW RM 'r �. RL-3 RM RL- �., el.r MD �I COASTAL Tali �-�• . ialwu� vl ` EXHIBIT 10 °a Drainage.and Sewer Systems CITY OF HUN INGTON BEACH INFRASTRUCTURE SCHEMATIC PLAN w V G" .,, EGEND lei rofwfurnuf� ��wwr» 1 © �fa�w�wuu �t=..s—t ra=s:-s:�:sa'1Eiilie�ll'» i-'r'..mia '.:"'?"Taa�• � ��`'`��. ...-�'r..�.••-- � wrMnMlMMd�M� Note M�1��I�I/NAfIrMMwMw MN 11L•3 I 1 AM I ARU < r., RM 0944 . I RMH MN I � . N RM row SM64 RL RM 09��*f / / r RM C*A%V / fMrAw� MD i CO f�RM S� EXHIBIT 11 o Water Systems CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INFRASTRUCTURE SCHEMATIC PLAN N W NICn)LLT-SEACUFFAREA SPECOFOC IPL ; N L EGEND � 0 oow..nw+rmr MNMy1MIWN�' IMNIr1Iw1��M hM Ff ►W�w►MwM�NrM YNw nl•I ~ww wwNM Usk �rwyY-y np ,,. :E (��wuo witioleno�a M•1 R� d L_AYJ rw.r+e..ow�w•w«f �� hMV MM/VANMgW MMA�h MIMMI�NMI Mw�wMNMN iRlr1 CLINAOIbENWEpT '� �, M,r„arec�c ruw / � AMA RM 0 ble-14116 II � M1..M00 MMMMMM qMM i 09 R M 1! is 'Am w W R1.1 rr+N+ 09 7Ct iH 1�14 •�wwMr�M ` y ,+ RM I Ina/! H; (4 ` W-9 Rw 03r" IV Rw 11.2 CO„►KJOK �wrwer—+ � wN 'O 1 a EXHIBIT 12 0 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH COMMUNITY THEME PLAN ;--' NJC(�II�V�SL�CLOPP AREA SG°PECOPOC PUM - ! ! '°�"" ol LEGEND t t; ®Koo.nAa.ouMfAa ACCUSMM ®�wfIrAwfALlf -••=• Y IWAlf AMA •s� `, / ITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH EXHIBIT 16 0 t..A AREAS W J01L LLVc,8EQCL 91FF AREA SPECQPUC PLAN ''°'m Ord. No. 3537 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) L CONNIE BROCKWAY,the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven;that the foregoing ordinance was read to said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 4th day of February, 2002, and was again read to said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of February, 2002, and was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council. AYES: Dettloff,Bauer,Cook,Boardman,Winchall NOES: None ABSENT: Green, Houchen ABSTAIN: None I,Connie Brockway CITY CLERK of the City of Huntington Beach and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council,do hereby certify that a synopsis of this ordinance has been published in the Independent on ,2002 In accordance with the City Charter of said City City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk Connie Brockway, Ci Clerk of the City Council of the City Deputy City Clerk of Huntington Beach, California (9) February 4, 2002 -Council/Agency Agenda - Page 9 D-2. (City Council) Public Hearing —Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2/Zomng Text 1N Amendment No. 00-1/1-ocal Coastal Program Amendment No. 00-1/Tentative Tract Map No. 15690(R)/Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14(R)/Negative Declaration1L No. 99-18 (PLC Land Company—8 Unit Single Family Subdivision w/s Edwards, I s/o Ellis — Holly Seacliff Specific Plan) Approve Introduction of Ordinance ,�- Nos. 3536 and 3537 (450.20) o 2 Public hearing to consider the following: Applicant: PLC Land Company Request: Zoning Map Amendment: To establish an estate residential zoning designation (Holly Seacliff Specific Plan RL-1) on approximately 2.7 acres. Local Coastal Program Amendment/Zoning Text Amendment: To amend the boundaries and text of the City's Local Coastal Program and Holly Seacliff Specific Plan to include the proposed development. Tentative Tract Map/Conditional Use Permit: To subdivide approximately 2.7 acres into eight lots for single family residential purposes on a parcel with greater than a three (3) foot grade differential between the high and low points. Location: West side of Edwards Street, approximately 150 feet south of Ellis Avenue (north of Fire Station). Environmental Status: Notice is hereby given that an initial environmental assessment for this agenda item was processed and completed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. It was determined that this agenda item, with mitigation, would not have any significant environmental effects and that a mitigated negative declaration is warranted. Prior to acting on the request, the City Council must review and act on the negative declaration. The environmental assessment is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Planning Department, 2000 Main Street, and is available for public inspection and comment by contracting the Planning Department, or by telephoning (714) 536-5271. 1. Staff report 2. City Council discussion 3. Open public hearing 4. Following public input,close public hearing Recommended Action: Staff Recommendation: Motion to: 1. Approve Negative Declaration No. 99-18 with Findings (Attachment No. 8); and 2. Approve Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2, Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1, and Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 00-1 with Findings for Approval and approve introduction of Ordinance Nos. 3536 and 3537 (Attachment No. 3 and 4) as follows: (Continued on Next Page) i (10) February 4, 2002 -Council/Agency Agenda - Page 10 After City Clerk reads by titles, approve by roll call vote, introduction of the following: j IN Ordinance No. 3536— An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending the V Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance by Establishing a Holly Seactiff Specific Plan (SP-9) Zoning Designation on Real Property Located on the West Side 2 of Edwards Street, South of Ellis Avenue (Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2);" and Ordinance No. 3537— An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan to Incorporate Real Property Located on the West Side of Edwards Street Approximately 150 Feet South of Ellis Avenue (Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1);" and 3. Approve Tentative Tract Map No. 15690 (R) and Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14 (R)with Findings and Suggested Conditions of Approval (Attachment Nol).2. Associate Planner Wayne Carvalho presented PowerPoint slide report (Late Communication) Approved Recommended Actions 1, 2 & 3, and Approved for Introduction Ordinance Nos. 3536 and 3537 and approved, as amended, revisions set forth in Late Communication and directed Planning staff to work with Public Works to provide for the maintenance costs of Lots A & B 4-2-1 (Cook, Boardman No; Houchen absent) (14) February 19, 2002 -Council/Agency Agenda - Page 14 G. Ordinances G-1. Ordinance for Adoption G-1a. (City Council) Adopt Ordinance Nos. 3536 and 3537 Amending the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance by Establishing a Holly Seacliff Specific Plan (SP-9) and Incorporating Real Property-w/s Edwards Street. s/o Ellis Avenue (450.20) After City Clerk reads by titles, adopt by roll call vote the following two ordinances: These ordinances were introduced at the February 4, 2002 Council meeting. Ordinance No. 3536— An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance by Establishing a Holly Seacliff Specific Plan (SP-9) Zoning Designation on Real Property Located on the West Side of Edwards Street, South of Ellis Avenue (Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2);" Adopted 5-0-2 (Green, Houchen absent) and Ordinance No. 3537— "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan to Incorporate Real Property Located on the West Side of Edwards Street Approximately 150 Feet South of Ellis Avenue (Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1);" Adopted 5-0-2 (Green, Houchen absent) 0 1 fffipqv� 0- Council/Agency Meeting Held: Deferred/Continued to: W�A , Ap roved ❑ Conditionally Approved ❑ Denied I�"CI y Clerk' Signature I AJ wtw. Council Meeting Date: February 4, 2002 Department ID Number: PL02-02 02 = � o CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH a REQUEST FOR ACTION o SUBMITTED TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS b SUBMITTED BY: RAY SILVER, City Administrator wad PREPARED BY: HOWARD ZELEFSKY, Director of Planning SUBJECT: APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15690(R)/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 99-14 (R)/LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT NO. 00-1/ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. 99- 353 6 C 2/ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 00-1/NEGATIVE arc( irlo DECLARATION NO. 99-18 (PLC LAND CO. 8 LOT SUBDIVISION) 3s37 Statement of Issue,Funding Source,Recommended Action,Alternative Action(s),Analysis,Environmental Status,Attachment(s) Statement of Issue: Transmitted for your consideration is a revised request for approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 15690, Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14, Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 00-1 , Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2, Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1, and Negative Declaration No. 99-18 by PLC Land Company. These applications represent a request to establish zoning on a 2.7 acre parcel located on the west side of Edwards Street, approximately 150 feet south of Ellis Avenue (north of Fire Station No. 6), and to permit the subdivision of the property into eight (8) lots for single family residences. The City Council denied the project in its entirety on July 5, 2000 with findings for denial (Attachment No. 9). On April 18, 2001 the applicant filed suit, challenging the denial (PLC v. City of Huntington Beach, OCSC # 01 CC05117). The applicant has revised the proposed development in response to concerns raised at the previous public hearing with respect to the grading of the site. The revised project consists of: 1) reducing the number of single family residential lots from 10 to 8; and 2) reorienting the lots including reducing the length of the cul de sac. The revision is an effort to minimize the amount of grading to the existing topography on the site and impacts to the adjacent Wieder Regional Park site. If the revised project is approved as submitted, it would likely result in dismissal of the litigation. l � 2 REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: February 4, 2002 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL02-02 Funding Source: Not applicable. Staff is recommending approval of the revised request (Recommended Action), because: - The project complies with the goals and objectives of the City's General Plan, which encourage development of new residential subdivisions that incorporate a diversity of uses and are configured to establish a distinct sense of neighborhood identity. The project will provide 8 single family units with its own sense of architectural identity, yet will be compatible with other developments in the area including The Bluffs, Country View Estates, and Central Park Estates. - With the implementation of mitigation measures, the proposed subdivision will not have any adverse environmental impacts. In addition, with standard conditions of approval and the revised site design, project issues will be mitigated to a level of insignificance. - The single family residential subdivision will comply with the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan RL-1 zoning designation. - Based upon the scale of development and the residential estate density, the proposal will be compatible with existing developments in the area. Recommended Action: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Motion to: 1. "Approve Negative Declaration No. 99-18 with findings (Attachment No. 8)"; and 2. "Approve Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2, Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1, and Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 00-1 with findings for approval and adopt Ordinance Nos. .3536 and 3.33? (Attachment No. 3 and 4)"; and 3. Approve Tentative Tract Map No. 15690 (R) and Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14 (R) with findings and suggested conditions of approval (Attachment No. ik." 2 PL02-02 -2- 1/28/2002 8:19 AM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: February 4, 2002 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL02-02 Alternative Action(s): The City Council may make the following alternative motion(s): 1. "Deny Negative Declaration No. 99-18, Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2, Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1, Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 00-1, Tentative Tract Map No. 15690 (R), and Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14 (R)." 2. "Continue Negative Declaration No. 99-18, Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2, Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1, Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 00-1, Tentative Tract Map No. 15690 (R), and Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14 (R) and direct staff accordingly." Analysis: A. BACKGROUND On March 28, 2000, following a public hearing, the Planning Commission approved Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2, Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1, Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 00-1 and Negative Declaration No. 99-18. The Commission subsequently denied Tentative Tract Map No. 15690 and Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14 for the 10 lot subdivision. On April 11, 2000, the Planning Commission voted to reconsider the approval of Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2, Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1, Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 00-1 and Negative Declaration No. 99-18 and scheduled a separate public hearing. On May 9, 2000, after a second public hearing, the Planning Commission denied Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2, Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1, Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 00-1 and Negative Declaration No. 99-18. On July 5, 2000, the City Council upheld the Planning Commission's action by denying the request for annexation, denying Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2, Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1, Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 00-1 and Negative Declaration No. 99-18, Tentative Tract Map No. 15690 and Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14. The City Council denied the request based on potential environmental impacts including impacts to views to and from Wieder Regional Park, and drainage to surrounding properties. On August 22, 2000, PLC re-initiates the request for annexation with LAFCO. PL02-02 -3- 1/28/2002 8:19 AM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: February 4, 2002 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL02-02 On May 11, 2001, PLC requests LAFCO to issue a Certificate of Filing of PLC's annexation request. LAFCO approves Certificate of Filing and schedules hearing on PLC's annexation request on June 13, 2001. On June 11, 2001, LAFCO approves PLC's annexation request, and Certificate of Completion of Annexation is recorded on October 18, 2001. B. PROJECT PROPOSAL: Applicant: PLC Land Co. c/o Bill Holman, 19 Corporate Plaza Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Location: West side of Edwards Street, approximately 150 feet south of Ellis Avenue Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2 is a request to modify the City's zoning map (DM 38) by designating the subject property Holly Seacliff Specific Plan (SP-9) with an RL-1 (Low Density Residential) land use category pursuant to Section 247.02 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (ZSO). The minimum lot size in RL-1 district is 7,000 square feet with a maximum density of four (4) units per gross acre. Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1 is a request to amend the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan by incorporating the subject property into the specific plan pursuant to Section 247.02 of the ZSO. Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 00-1 is a request to amend the City's Local Coastal Program to incorporate the proposed zoning map amendment and zoning text amendment pursuant to Section 247.16 of the ZSO. Tentative Tract Map No. 15690 (R) is a request to subdivide approximately 2.7 net acres into eight residential lots for the purpose of constructing eight single family residences pursuant to Section 251.02 of the ZSO. The proposed density is 3 units per net acre. Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14 (R) represents a request to develop on property with greater than a three foot grade differential between the high and low points pursuant to Section 230.70 of the ZSO. The purpose is to evaluate the proposed grading plan, which should terrace proposed buildings with the grade. There is a 16 foot difference between the highest point along Edwards Street to the lowest point along the west property line. The revision to the proposed single family subdivision consists of increased lot sizes ranging from 8,372 to 19,340 square feet, with an average size of 12,772 square feet. This compares to an average lot size of 9,900 sq. ft. on the originally proposed 10 lot tract. Access to the tract will be provided from Edwards Street through a public non-gated cul-de- PL02-02 -4- 1/28/2002 8:19 AM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: February 4, 2002 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL02-02 sac (see Attachment No. 5). A 15-foot wide landscape parkway is designed along Edwards Street which will be maintained by a homeowners association. The revised request involves grading the entire site and importing approximately 8,100 cubic yards of soil to design the site for drainage compared with 12,500 cubic yards under the 10 lot proposal. The majority of the fill (up to 11.2 ft.) will occur toward the northwest corner of the tract near the slope adjacent to Wieder Regional Park (Attachment No. 5). The applicant has also submitted a site plan, floor plans and elevations for the eight single family homes. However, since these plans were not included in the original submittal, separate review and approval by the Planning Commission is required. Staff will be scheduling a separate public hearing before the Planning Commission if the City Council approves the zoning and subdivision applications. The following table identifies the subject property and surrounding Land Use, Zoning and General Plan Designations. LOCATION GENERAL PLAN ZONING LAND USE Subject Property: Residential Estate (Holly Existing — None Existing —Vacant Seacliff General Plan Proposed — Holly Proposed — Single Amendment - 1990) Seacliff Specific family residences Plan (RL-1) East of Subject Residential Estate Ellis Goldenwest Single family Property (across Specific Plan residences Edwards St.): South of Subject Residential Low Density Holly Seacliff Fire Station/Water Property: Specific Plan (RL-1) Reservoir West of Subject Open Space A-1 (General Vacant (Wieder Property Agriculture) Regional Park) (in Orange Co.): North of Subject Recreation/ Recreation/ Vacant (Wieder Property Conservation Conservation Regional Park) (in Orange Co.): Attached are area maps that depict the proposed zoning and surrounding General Plan and zoning designations (Attachment Nos. 10 and 11). Attachment No. 10 identifies the current General Plan designation on the subject property while Attachment No. 11 identifies the proposed zoning. The applicant indicates that the proposed Holly Seacliff Specific Plan (RL-1) zoning designation will be compatible with the adjacent zoning designations and land uses, and will allow for future housing opportunities. PL02-02 -5- 1/28/2002 8:19 AM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: February 4, 2002 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL02-02 This property is part of the Holly Seacliff Development Agreement No. 90-1. The terms of the development agreement became effective upon annexation of the subject property into the City of Huntington Beach. The property was annexed to the City following LAFCO approval in June of 2001 and recording of a Certificate of Completion of Annexation on October 18, 2001. The development agreement offered the City the option for five years to accept dedication for park purposes on either the subject 2.7 acre parcel (Parcel 7a) or a 4.5 acre parcel at the northeast corner of Edwards Street and Ellis Avenue (Parcel 7b). In April of 1994, the City accepted dedication of the 4.5 acre Parcel 7b. Attachment No. 12 provides a chronology of the County's and City's actions regarding the subject property. C. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION: Zoning In 1990, the City Council approved the Holly Seacliff General Plan Amendment and Environmental Impact Report (EIR) that included a land use designation on the property of Estate Residential (max. 4 units per gross acre). It specifically depicted the subject property as part of a ten acre planning area with a maximum of 25 residential units (see Attachment No. 4). The intent of the pre-general planning action was to inform the property owner and surrounding landowners that the City has reviewed and pre-approved the Estate Residential designation for the site should it ever be annexed into the City. The subject property was annexed to the City on October 18, 2001, with a General Plan Land Use designation of Estate Residential. However, according to our zoning maps and records, the property has never had a pre-zoning designation. Over the years, the City has pre-zoned surrounding areas but not this site. The proposed Holly Seacliff Specific Plan, RL-1 zoning designation will allow a density up to four units per gross acre with an average density of 1.6 units per gross acre (Attachment No. 4) consistent with the pre-general plan designation. Based on the annexation in October of 2000, the Development Agreement now applies to the subject property. Staff supports the proposed zoning of Holly Seacliff Specific Plan (RL- 1) because it is consistent with the general plan land use designation of Estate Residential. The Holly Seacliff Specific Plan (RL-1) allows up to four units per gross acre that is consistent with the Estate Residential General Plan designation. Furthermore, the zoning designation will be compatible with the adjacent designations to the south (The Bluffs), and east across Edwards Street (Ellis Goldenwest Specific Plan). The adjacent property located in the County of Orange (Wieder Regional Park) will remain designated as open space. Staff further supports the establishment of the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan (RL-1) zoning on the property, along with the amendment to the boundary of the specific plan because the estate residential use would be most compatible with the surrounding land uses. Staff also supports the minor modifications to the acreage figures cited in the text and tables of the PL02-02 -6- 1/28/2002 8:19 AM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: February 4, 2002 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL02-02 specific plan. The acreage figures within the specific plan will be revised by adding approximately 3 acres. The zoning will allow estate residential uses to be constructed at a maximum density of four units per gross acre. Development Proposal In September of 2001, the applicant submitted site plans, floor plans and elevations for eight single family homes requesting concurrent approval with the zoning and tentative map applications. However, the original application submittal only involved the zoning and subdivision requests; no plans for the homes were reviewed. Now that an application for the construction of the homes has been received, separate review and approval by the Planning Commission is required. One of the issues discussed at the prior Planning Commission and City Council meetings were the potential impacts the development would have on the adjacent Wieder Regional Park. Staff is recommending a condition of approval requiring a covenant be recorded on Lots 1-6 that would restrict grading and construction of any structures between the top of the slope and rear property lines (tract perimeter) without the approval of the City of Huntington Beach. The condition is recommended to minimize view impacts to and from the park site. The applicant has conceptually agreed to this condition. D. SUMMARY Staff supports the applicant's request because the subdivision complies with the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan, and will not adversely impact surrounding uses. Staff believes the project should be approved because it is designed to minimize impacts to the existing topography along the Wieder Regional Park site. Staff recommends the City Council approve Negative Declaration No. 99-18, Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2, Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1, Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 00-1, Tentative Tract Map No. 15690 (R), and Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14 (R) based on the following: - The project complies with the goals and objectives of the City's General Plan, which encourage development of new residential subdivisions that incorporate a diversity of uses and are configured to establish a distinct sense of neighborhood identity. The project will provide 8 single family units with it's own sense of architectural identity, yet will be compatible with other developments in the area including The Bluffs, Country View Estates, and Central Park Estates. - With the implementation of mitigation measures, the proposed subdivision will not have any adverse environmental impacts. In addition, with standard conditions of approval, project issues will be mitigated to a level of insignificance. PL02-02 -7- 1/28/2002 8:19 AM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: February 4, 2002 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL02-02 - The single family residential subdivision will comply with the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan RL-1 zoning designation. - Based upon the scale of development and the residential estate density, the proposal will be compatible with existing developments in the area. Environmental Status: Negative Declaration No. 99-18 was prepared with mitigation measures pursuant to Section 240.04 of the HBZSO and the provisions of the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA). Prior to any action on Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 00-1, Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2, Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1, Tentative Tract Map No. 15690 (R), and Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14 (R), it is necessary for the City Council to review and act on Negative Declaration No. 99-18. Attachment(s): City Clerk's Page Number No. Description 1. Vicinity Map 2. Suggested Findings and Conditions of Approval 3. Ordinance No.353 6 (ZMA 99-2) amending District Map No. 38 4. Ordinance No. .3537 with Legislative Draft (ZTA 00-1) amending Holly Seacliff Specific Plan 5. Tentative Tract Map No. 15690 (Revised 8 Lots) 6. Revised site plan dated January 9, 2002 7. Letter from applicant dated September 14, 2001 8. Negative Declaration No. 99-18 (Includes environmental checklist, mitigation measures, and comment letters) 9. City Council Minutes dated July 5, 2000 10. Existing and Proposed General Plan Designations 11. Existing and Proposed Zoning 12. 1 Chronology of County, City and LAFCO actions RCA Author: Wayne Canraiho PL02-02 -8- 1/28/2002 8:19 AM (9) February 4, 2002 -Council/Agency Agenda - Page 9 D- — -'� 2. (City Council) Public Hearing Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2/Zoning Text 1N Amendment No. 00-1/Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 00-1/Tentative Tract Map No. 15690(R)/Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14(R)/Negative Declaration1L No.99-18 (PLC Land Company—8 Unit Single Family Subdivision w/s Edwards, I s/o Ellis—Holly Seacliff Specific Plan) Approve Introduction of Ordinance ��- Nos. 3536 and 3537 (450.20) afi 2 Public hearing to consider the following: Applicant: PLC Land Company Request: Zoning Map Amendment: To establish an estate residential zoning designation (Holly Seacliff Specific Plan RL-1) on approximately 2.7 acres. Local Coastal Program Amendment/Zoning Text Amendment: To amend the boundaries and text of the City's Local Coastal Program and Holly Seacliff Specific Plan to include the proposed development. Tentative Tract Map/Conditional Use Permit: To subdivide approximately 2.7 acres into eight lots for single family residential purposes on a parcel with greater than a three (3) foot grade differential between the high and low points. Location: West side of Edwards Street, approximately 150 feet south of Ellis Avenue (north of Fire Station). Environmental Status: Notice is hereby given that an initial environmental assessment for this agenda item was processed and completed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. It was determined that this agenda item, with mitigation, would not have any significant environmental effects and that a mitigated negative declaration is warranted. Prior to acting on the request, the City Council must review and act on the negative declaration. The environmental assessment is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Planning Department, 2000 Main Street, and is available for public inspection and comment by contracting the Planning Department, or by telephoning (714) 536-5271. 1. Staff report 2. City Council discussion 3. Open public hearing 4. Following public input,close public hearing Recommended Action: Staff Recommendation: Motion to: 1. Approve Negative Declaration No. 99-18 with Findings (Attachment No. 8); and 2. Approve Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2, Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1, and Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 00-1 with Findings for Approval and approve introduction of Ordinance Nos. 3536 and 3537 (Attachment No. 3 and 4) as follows: (Continued on Next Page) (10) February 4, 2002 -Council/Agency Agenda - Page 10 After City Clerk reads by titles, approve by roll call vote, introduction of the following: IN Ordinance No. 3536— An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending they Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance by Establishing a Holly Seacliff Specific Plan (SP-9) Zoning Designation on Real Property Located on the West Side 2 of Edwards Street, South of Ellis Avenue (Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2);" and Ordinance No. 3537 — "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan to Incorporate Real Property Located on the West Side of Edwards Street Approximately 150 Feet South of Ellis Avenue (Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1);" and 3. Approve Tentative Tract Map No. 15690 (R) and Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14 (R)with Findings and Suggested Conditions of Approval (Attachment Nol).2. Associate Planner Wayne Carvalho presented PowerPoint slide report (Late Communication) Approved Recommended Actions 1, 2 & 3, and Approved for Introduction Ordinance Nos. 3536 and 3537 and approved, as amended, revisions set forth in Late Communication and directed Planning staff to work with Public Works to provide for the maintenance costs of Lots A & B 4-2-1 (Cook, Boardman No; Houchen absent) (14) February 19, 2002 -Council/Agency Agenda - Page 14 G. Ordinances G-1. Ordinance for Adoption G-1a. (City Council) Adopt Ordinance Nos. 3536 and 3537 Amending the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance by Establishing a Holly Seacliff Specific Plan (SP-9) and Incorporating Real Property-w/s Edwards Street, s/o Ellis Avenue (450.20) After City Clerk reads by titles, adopt by roll call vote the following two ordinances: These ordinances were introduced at the February 4, 2002 Council meeting. Ordinance No. 3536— "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance by Establishing a Holly Seacliff Specific Plan (SP-9) Zoning Designation on Real Property Located on the West Side of Edwards Street, South of Ellis Avenue (Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2);" Adopted 5-0-2 (Green, Houchen absent) and Ordinance No. 3537— An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan to Incorporate Real Property Located on the West Side of Edwards Street Approximately 150 Feet South of Ellis Avenue (Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1);" Adopted 5-0-2 (Green, Houchen absent) ATTACHMENT 1 e Gym Co YCS � nN71NGTON BE4 H �� � /�--� n s rr 1 n 11• 1'�(:IIAIIM� CIIIYANI9 Jj� WLW[t1 WQ;.T r, aonuun L OIIAUIUI.YLL •�1 nawwul eu(.*loun 1 almpMo � !1 ifOOlO711M' • �� a awn 04 jrr""' ATTACHMENT 2 FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 99-18/LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT NO. 00-1/ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. 99-2/ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 00-1 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15690 (R)/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 99-14 (R) FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL -NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 99-18: 1. The Negative Declaration No. 99-18 has been prepared in compliance with Article 6 of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) Guidelines. It was advertised and available for a public comment period of thirty (30) days. Comments received during the comment period were considered by the City Council prior to action on the Negative Declaration, Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1, Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2, Local Coastal Program Amendment, Tentative Tract Map No. 15690, and Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14. 2. Mitigation measures, incorporated into the attached conditions of approval, avoid or reduce the project's effects to a point where clearly no significant effect on the environment will occur. 3. There is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the City Council that the project, as mitigated through the conditions of approval for Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1, Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2, Local Coastal Program Amendment, Tentative Tract Map No. 15690, and Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14 will have a significant effect on the environment. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL—LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT NO. 00-1: 1. The Local Coastal Program amendment to the Huntington Beach Local Coastal Program to modify the boundary of the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan to incorporate the subject property and to establish the RL-1 zoning designation is consistent with the designation for Estate Residential cited in the 1990 Holly Seacliff Specific Plan General Plan Amendment. 2. The proposed change to the Local Coastal Program is in accordance with the policies, standards, and provisions of the Coastal Element that encourages a mix of housing opportunities that vary in price and type. The proposed land use will provide for future upscale residential opportunities. 3. The development conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. The proposed project will not interfere with public access opportunities provided along the Weider Regional Park, and will not impact public views. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. 99-2/ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 00-1: 1. Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2 and Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1 to establish a zoning designation of Holly Seacliff Specific Plan (RL-1) on a 2.7 acre parcel, and to incorporate the subject property into the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan and any applicable specific plan. The proposed 1 zoning will be compatible with the adjacent estate residential zoning designations of the Holly Seacliff and Ellis Goldenwest Specific Plans. 2. In the case of a general land use provision,the zoning map and text amendment are compatible with the uses authorized in, and the standards prescribed for,the zoning district for which it is proposed. The proposed zoning will allow estate residential uses consistent with the existing land uses in the area. 3. A community need is demonstrated for the change proposed. The new zoning will allow for new single family residential development. 4. Its adoption will be in conformity with public convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice. The proposed zoning will not result in isolated or spot zoning, and will be consistent with the existing Estate Residential General Plan designation. The Holly Seacliff Specific Plan RL-1 allows up to four units per gross acre which is consistent with the Estate Residential General Plan designation. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15690 (R): 1. Tentative Tract Map No. 15690 (R) for a subdivision of approximately 2.7 acres into eight(8) residential lots with two lettered lots for landscaping purposes is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element designation of Estate Residential on the subject property, or any applicable specific plan, or other applicable provisions of this Code. The proposed subdivision will be compatible in size and intensity with the adjacent residential developments in the Holly Seacliff and Ellis Goldenwest Specific Plan areas. 2. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of development. The subdivision will involve grading that will provide sufficient rear yards for the eight single family homes without impacting the adjacent Wieder Regional Park site. 3. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not cause serious health problems or substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The eight lot subdivision will have no adverse impacts on any fish or wildlife or their habitats. 4. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision unless alternative easements, for access or for use, will be provided. All necessary easements will be provided with the creation of the parcels and the development of the site. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 99-14 (R): 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14 (R) for the development of a site with greater than a three foot grade differential between the high and low points will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. Based upon the conditions imposed, the development will be designed to minimize impacts from grading, and will not be detrimental to the surrounding properties. 2 2. The conditional use permit will be compatible with surrounding uses based on proposed zoning and development standards. Any future development of the site will be required to comply with identical development standards set forth in the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan. 3. The proposed eight lot subdivision will comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. In addition, any specific condition required for the proposed use in the district in which it would be located. Any future development will be required to comply with the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan unless separate variances are approved by the City of Huntington Beach. 4. The granting of the conditional use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan. It is consistent with the Land Use Element designation of Estate Residential on the subject property CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15690 (R): 1. The tentative map received and dated January 8, 2002 shall be the approved layout. 2. Prior to submittal of the final map to the Public Works Department for processing and approval by the City Council, the following shall be required: a. The Settlement and Release Agreement pertaining to the PLC lawsuit of the City's denial of entitlements associated with the original 10 lot subdivision shall be approved by the City Council. b. The Affordable Housing Agreement Plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. The agreement shall provide for affordable housing on-site or off-site. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of the first building permit for the tract. The contents of the agreement shall include the following: 1) Minimum 15 percent of the units (2 units) shall be affordable to families of moderate income level (less than 120% of Orange County median) for a period of thirty years. 2) A detailed description of the type, size, location and phasing of the affordable units. 3) If affordable units (new or rehabilitate) are off-site, they must be under the full control of the applicant. 4) The affordable units shall be constructed prior to or concurrent with the primary project. Final approval (occupancy) of the first residential unit in the tract shall be contingent upon the completion and public availability, or evidence of the applicant's reasonable progress towards attainment of completion, of the affordable units. c. The grade on the sloped landscaped areas adjacent to the park shall not be modified without the approval of the Planning Director. A covenant restricting the grading and redesign of the sloped condition shall be recorded on the properties. A copy of the covenant shall be reviewed by the City Attorney prior to recordation. A copy of the recorded documents shall be submitted to the Planning Department for inclusion in the Tract file. 3 3. The following conditions shall be completed prior to recordation of the final map unless otherwise stated. Bonding may be substituted for construction in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. (PW) a. A reproducible mylar copy and a print of the recorded map shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works at the time of recordation. (PW) b. The engineer or surveyor preparing the final map shall comply with Sections 7-9-330 and 7-9- 337 of the Orange County Subdivision Code and Orange County Subdivision Manual, Subarticle 18 for the following items: 1) Tie the boundary of the map into the Horizontal Control System established by the County Surveyor. 2) Provide a digital-graphics file of said map to the County of Orange. (PW) c. Provide a digital-graphics file of said map to the City per the following design criteria: 1) Design Specification: a) Digital data shall be full size (1:1) and in compliance with the California coordinate system — STATEPLANE Zone 6 (Lambert Conformal Conic projection),NAD 83 datum in accordance with the County of Orange Ordinance 3809. b) Digital data shall have double precision accuracy (up to fifteen significant digits). c) Digital data shall have units in US FEET. d) A separate drawing file shall be submitted for each individual sheet. e) Digital data shall be in compliance with the Huntington Beach Standard Sheets, drawing names, pen color and layering conventions. f) Feature compilation shall include, but shall not be limited to: Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APN), street addresses and street names with suffix. 2) File Format and Media Specification: a) Shall be in compliance with the following file format: • AutoCAD (version 13 or later) drawing file: _.DWG b) Shall be in compliance with the following media type: • CD Recordable (CD-R) 650 Megabytes d. The following shall be shown as a dedication to the City of Huntington Beach on the Final Map: 1) "A" Street for public street purposes. 2) A 2.00 foot wide public utility easement as shown on said map (7 ft. parkways or less). 3) The water system and appurtenances as shown on the improvement plans. 4 4) The sewer system and appurtenances as shown on the improvement plans. 5) The easement for sewer purposes as shown on said map. (PW) e. All vehicular access rights to Edwards Street shall be released and relinquished to the City of Huntington Beach except at locations approved by the City Council. (PW) f. All improvement securities (Faithful Performance, Labor& Material and Monument Bonds) and Subdivision Agreement shall be posted with the Public Works Department and approved as to form by the City Attorney. (PW) g. A Certificate of Insurance shall be filed with the Public Works Department and approved as to form by the City Attorney. (PW) h. The Final Map shall be recorded with the County of Orange prior to issuance of building permits. (PW). i. All Public Works fees shall be paid. (PW) j. The area covered by this tentative map shall be annexed to the Reservoir Hill Assessment District in order to provide Zone 2 water service. All necessary studies and processing fees shall be paid by the Subdivider. (PW) k. Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2 and Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1 shall be approved by the City Council. 1. The subdivider shall work with the Department of Public Works to establish a fund to provide for the on-going maintenance costs of Lots A and B (landscaping). 4. The following conditions shall be completed prior to issuance of a grading permit: a. A Grading Plan, prepared by a Licensed Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval. This plan shall also include an erosion and silt control plan for all water runoff during construction and site preparation work. (PW) b. A Street Improvement Plan, prepared by a Licensed Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval. The following improvements shall be shown on the plan: 1) Curb and gutter, sidewalk, street pavement, signing, striping and street lighting for"A" Street. 2) An ADA compliant access ramp at the northwest and southwest corners of Edwards Street and "A" Street. 3) Sewage collection system including individual sewer laterals for each lot. 4) Water distribution system connecting to the existing 12-inch main in Edwards Street. 5) A new domestic water service and meter for each lot shall be installed per Water Division standards, and sized to meet the minimum requirements set by the California Plumbing Code (CPC). The water service shall be a minimum of 1-inch in size. 5 6) A separate water service, meter and backflow protection device shall be installed to serve reclaimed water for common area landscaping (Lots "A" and "B"). (PW) c. In accordance with NPDES requirements, a"Water Quality Management Plan" shall be prepared by a Civil or Environmental Engineer. "Best Management Practices" shall be identified and incorporated into the design. (PW) d. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered engineer. This analysis shall include on- site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations for grading, chemical and fill properties, retaining walls, streets, and utilities. (PW) e. A Landscape and Irrigation Plan,prepared by a Licensed Landscape Architect, shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval by the Park, Tree and Landscape Division. The Developer shall submit irrigation demands to ensure proper irrigation demands to ensure proper irrigation service sizing. Plans for temporary erosion control on slopes at rear and sides of lots shall be included. (PW) f. If soil remediation is required, a remediation plan shall be submitted to the Planning, Public Works and Fire Departments for review and approval in accordance with City Specifications No. 431-92 and the conditions of approval. The plan shall include methods to minimize remediation- related impacts on the surrounding properties; details on how all drainage associated with the remediation efforts shall be retained on site and no wastes or pollutants shall escape the site; and shall also identify wind barriers around remediation equipment. (PW) g. The name and phone number of an on-site field supervisor hired by the developer shall be submitted to the Departments of Planning and Public Works. In addition, clearly visible signs shall be posted on the perimeter of the site every 250 feet indicating who shall be contacted for information regarding this development and any construction/grading-related concerns. This contact person shall be available immediately to address any concerns or issues raised by adjacent property owners during the construction activity. He/She will be responsible for ensuring compliance with the conditions herein, specifically, grading activities, truck routes, construction hours, noise, etc. Signs shall include the applicant's contact number, City contact (Construction Manager (714) 536-5431) regarding grading and construction activities, and"1-800-CUTSMOG" in the event there are concerns regarding fugitive dust and compliance with AQMD Rule No. 403. (PW) h. The applicant shall notify all property owners and tenants within 300 feet of the perimeter of the property of a tentative grading schedule at least 30 days prior to such grading. (PW) i. The developer shall coordinate the development of a truck haul route with the Department of Public Works if the import or export of material is required. This plan shall include the approximate number of truck trips and the proposed truck haul routes. It shall specify the hours in which transport activities can occur and methods to mitigate construction-related impacts to adjacent residents. These plans must include a truck haul route diagram and be submitted for approval to the Department of Public Works Transportation Division. No fees are required for such haul route permit. (PW) 6 j. The applicant's grading/erosion control plan shall abide by the provisions of AQMD's Rule 403 as related to fugitive dust control. (PW) k. Blockwall/fencing plans (including a site plan, section drawings, and elevations depicting the height and material of all retaining walls, walls, and fences) consistent with the grading plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department. The plans shall identify materials, seep holes and drainage. 5. During grading operations,the following shall be complied with: a. Due to the proximity of the site to a known archeological site, grading activities during remedial site grading work shall be monitored by an archeologist. (Mitigation Measure) b. Water trucks will be utilized on the site and shall be available to be used throughout the day during site grading to keep the soil damp enough to prevent dust being raised by the operations. (PW) c. All haul trucks shall arrive at the site no earlier than 8:00 a.m. or leave the site no later than 5:00 p.m., and shall be limited to Monday through Friday only. (PW) d. Wet down the areas that are to be graded or that are being graded, in the late morning and after work is completed for the day. (PW) e. The construction disturbance area shall be kept as small as possible. (PW) f. All haul trucks shall be covered or have water applied to the exposed surface prior to leaving the site to prevent dust from impacting the surrounding areas. (PW) g. Prior to leaving the site, all haul trucks shall be washed off on-site on a gravel surface to prevent dirt and dust from leaving the site and impacting public streets. (PW) h. Comply with appropriate sections of AQMD Rule 403,particularly to minimize fugitive dust and noise to surrounding areas. (PW) i. Wind barriers shall be installed along the perimeter of the site. (PW) j. Remediation operations, if required, shall be performed in stages concentrating in single areas at a time to minimize the impact of fugitive dust and noise on the surrounding areas. (PW) k. Construction equipment shall be maintained in peak operating condition to reduce emissions. 1. Use low sulfur(0.5%) fuel by weight for construction equipment. in. Truck idling shall be prohibited for periods longer than 10 minutes. 7 n. Attempt to phase and schedule activities to avoid high ozone days first stage smog alerts. o. Discontinue operation during second stage smog alerts. 6. The Departments of Planning, Public Works and Fire are responsible for compliance with all conditions of approval herein as noted after each condition. The Planning Director and Public Works Director shall be notified in writing if any changes to tract map are proposed as a result of the plan check process. Permits shall not be issued until the Planning Director and Public Works Director have reviewed and approved the proposed changes for conformance with the intent of the City Council's action and the conditions herein. If the proposed changes are of a substantial nature, an amendment to the original entitlement may be required pursuant to the HBZSO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL—CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 99-14 (R): 1. The site plan received and dated January 8, 2002 shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following modifications: a. The site plan, floor plans, building elevations, and fencing plans shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Commission. Any deviation from development standards specified in the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan shall be subject to review and approval of a variance by the Planning Commission. b. Lots 3-6 shall be provided with one additional off-street parking space pursuant to the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan for lots with 30 ft. frontages. c. Depict all utility apparatus, such as but not limited to back flow devices and Edison transformers on the site plan. Utility meters shall be screened from view from public rights-of-way. Electric transformers in a required front or street side yard shall be enclosed in subsurface vaults. Backflow prevention devices shall be prohibited in the front yard setback and shall be screened from view. (Code Requirement) d. Depict all gas meters, water meters, electrical panels, air conditioning units, mailbox facilities and similar items on the site plan and elevations. If located on a building, they shall be architecturally designed into the building to appear as part of the building. They shall be architecturally compatible with the building and non-obtrusive, not interfere with sidewalk areas and comply with required setbacks. e. If outdoor lighting is included, energy saving lamps shall be used. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties and shall be shown on the site plan and elevations. 8 2. Prior to submittal for building permits,the following shall be completed: a. Zoning entitlement conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on one of the first three pages of all the working drawing sets used for issuance of building permits (architectural, structural, electrical, mechanical and plumbing) and shall be referenced in the sheet index. The minimum font size utilized for printed text shall be 12 point. b. All Fire Department requirements shall be noted on the building plans. (FD) c. An engineering geologist shall be engaged to submit a report indicating the ground surface acceleration from earth movement for the subject property. All structures within this development shall be constructed in compliance with the g-factors as indicated by the geologist's report. Calculations for footings and structural members to withstand anticipated g-factors shall be submitted to the City for review prior to the issuance of building permits. (Code Requirement) d. Floor plans shall depict natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at the location of clothes dryers; natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters and central heating units. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits,the following shall be completed: a. Applicant shall modify the sewer alignment on the fire station site per the City Engineer's direction. (PW) b. All landscape planting, irrigation and maintenance shall comply with the City Arboricultural and Landscape Standards and Specifications. (PW) c. The Consulting Arborist(approved by the City Landscape Architect) shall review the final landscape tree-planting plan and approve in writing the selection and locations proposed for new trees and the protection measures and locations of existing trees to remain. Existing trees to remain shall also be addressed by said Arborist with recommendations/requirements for protection during construction. Said Arborist report shall be incorporated onto the Landscape Architect's plans as construction notes and/or construction requirements. The report shall include the Arborist's name, certificate number and the Arborist's wet signature on the final plan. (PW) d. An Automatic sprinkler and fire alarm system shall be installed throughout if the building gross square footage exceeds 5000 sq. ft. Shop drawings shall be submitted and approved by the Fire Department prior to system installation. (FD) e. Fire hydrants shall be installed prior to combustible construction. Prior to installation, shop drawings shall be submitted to the Public Works Department and approved by the Fire Department. Indicate hydrant locations and fire department connections. (FD) f. Fire access roads shall be provided in compliance with City Specification No. 401. Include the Circulation Plan and dimensions of all access roads. (FD) 9 g. Submit a Fire Protection Plan in compliance with City Specification No. 426 for Fire Department approval. (FD) h. The project shall comply with all provisions of the HBFC and City specification 422, Well Abandonment. (FD) i. The project shall comply with all provisions of the HBMC Section 17.04.085 and City Specification 429, Methane District Building Permit Requirements. (FD) j. Installation and/or removal of underground flammable or combustible liquid storage tanks shall comply with Orange County Environmental Health and HBFD requirements. Treatment areas may require conformance to City Specification No. 431, Gas Fired Appliances. (FD) k. Address numbers shall be installed to comply with City Specification No. 428. (FD) 1. Street names shall be approved by the Fire Department. Please refer to City Specification No. 409. (FD) 4. The structure(s) cannot be occupied, the final building permit(s) cannot be approved, and utilities cannot be released for the first residential unit until the following has been completed: a. A section of existing curb, gutter and sidewalk along Edwards Street must be removed and replaced. Existing street tree(s)must be inspected by the City of Huntington Beach, Park, Trees and Landscape Inspector during removal of concrete and prior to construction of"A" Street improvements. Tree replacement or root/tree protection, will be specified upon the inspection of the root system. (PW) b. All landscape irrigation and planting installation shall be certified to be in conformance to the City approved landscape plans by the Landscape Architect of record in written form to the City Landscape Architect prior to the final landscape inspection and approval. (PW) c. Applicant shall provide the City with Microfilm copies (in City format) and CD (AutoCAD only) copy of complete City approved landscape construction drawings as stamped"Permanent File Copy"prior to starting landscape work. Copies shall be given to the City Landscape Architect for permanent City record. (PW) d. A covenant prohibiting the removal of the open view fencing along the perimeter of the west and north property lines shall be recorded with the County Recorder's Office. The covenant shall be submitted to the Planning Department, and shall be reviewed as to form by the City Attorney's Office. A copy of the recorded covenant shall be filed with the Planning Department. 5. Prior to final building permit inspection and approval of the first residential unit, the following shall be completed: a. Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein shall be accomplished and verified by the Planning Department. 10 b. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. 6. The Planning Director ensures that all conditions of approval herein are complied with. The Planning Director shall be notified in writing if any changes to the site plan, elevations and floor plans are proposed as a result of the plan check process. Building permits shall not be issued until the Planning Director has reviewed and approved the proposed changes for conformance with the intent of the City Council's action and the conditions herein. If the proposed changes are of a substantial nature, an amendment to the original entitlement may be required pursuant to the HBZSO. 7. Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14 (R) shall not become effective until Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1 and Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2 have been approved by the City Council and are in effect. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS—TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15690 (R)/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 99-14 (R): 1. Tentative Tract Map No. 15690 (R) and Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14 (R) shall not become effective until the Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1 and Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2 have been approved by the City Council and are in effect. 2. Tentative Tract Map No. 15690 (R) and Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14 (R) shall become null and void unless exercised within two years of the date of final zoning text amendment and zoning map amendment approval or such extension of time as may be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. 3. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Tentative Tract Map No. 15690 (R) and Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14 (R), pursuant to a public hearing for revocation, if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance or Municipal Code occurs. 4. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, Building Division, and Fire Department as well as applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards, except as noted herein. 5. Standard landscape code requirements apply (Chapter 232 of the ZSO). (PW) 6. The Water Ordinance No. 14.52, the "Water Efficient Landscape Requirements" apply for projects with 2500 square feet of landscaping or larger. (PW) 7. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid prior to map recordation. (PW) 8. Traffic impact fees shall be paid at a rate of$150 per daily trip ($14,400). (PW) 9. An Encroachment Permit is required for all work within the City's right-of-way. (PW) 11 10. Park and recreation in-lieu fees shall be paid, or accrued credits assigned, prior to Council approval of the final map. 11. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of$43 for the posting of the Notice of Determination at the County of Orange Clerk's Office. The check shall be made out to the County of Orange and submitted to the Planning Department within two (2) days of the City Council's action. 12. Construction shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. 13. All landscaping shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner, and in conformance with the HBZSO. Prior to removing or replacing any landscaped areas, check with the Departments of Planning and Public Works for Code requirements. Substantial changes may require approval by the Planning Commission. I 12 CITY CLERK'S ORIGINAL ADDENDUM TO SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15690 (R)/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 99-14 (R) PG. D-2.15 2. Prior to submittal of the final map to the Public Works Department for processing and approval by the City Council, the following shall be required: d. The grade on the sloped landscaped areas adjacent to the park shall not be modified without the approval of the Planning Director. A covenant restricting the grading and redesign of the sloped condition shall be recorded on the properties. A copy of the covenant shall be reviewed by the City Attorney prior to recordation. A copy of the recorded documents shall be submitted to the Planning Department for inclusion in the Tract file. PG. D-2.17 4. The following conditions shall be completed prior to issuance of a grading permit: b. A Street Improvement Plan,prepared by a Licensed Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval. The following improvements shall be shown on the plan: 6) A separate water service, meter and backflow protection device shall be installed to serve reclaimed water for common area landscaping (Lots"A" and`B") and fer an), median landsGaping in Edwards Street, unless- A-t—h-e-PA,iss A- 8 ppr-eved by the Water-Divisien.Jr (PVV) PG. D-2.19 1. The site plan received and dated January 8, 2002 shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following modifications: a. The fimi.4 site plan, floor plans, building elevations, and fencing plans shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Commission. Any deviation from development standards specified in the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan shall be subject to review and approval of a variance by the Planning Commission. G. The peli-me-taff-U--ag-t- f@RGing along the west and n@Fth property hines shall be of epell;Vroug:ht ir-cm design as noted-en the site plan se-rations dr-a"A'zings, with the exreptien th-at 4-he F-A--ar (R9#h) of L PG. D-2.20 3. Prior to issuance of building permits,the following shall be completed: a. Applicant shall modify the sewer alignment on the fire station site per the City Engineer's direction. Pepa;#nent of Public Q�nrLa to mi agate impact of innroagg r,mnff due t �nx.n�np nr r vxxm cv xzacxsaco xxapccvc vx xavrvavvmzaxvxx�resvrcv�eyele xxxvrrr-vr provide mitigation for all rainfall event 4equORGi@S „ to a 100 nor frnn nnn<r ( •') - 2 PIC February 4, 2002 RECEIVED FROM 6�1.,Qna12 AM)MADE A PART OF7HEREOORDATTMv COUNCIL IM ETMIG OF OFRCE OF THROW CLERIC COME BROCKWAY.CIITY CLIP( ITEM 4 "�— '�v��rc Honorable Debbie Cook, Mayor Huntington Beach City Council 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Subject: Tentative Tract Map No. 15690(R) Mayor Cook and Council Members: PLC respectfully requests approval of the above revised subdivision map and related applications for the 2.7-acre property located on the west side of Edwards Street, south of Ellis Avenue. In response to the City's offer to settle ongoing litigation and disputes regarding PLC's development of the site, PLC offered in September 2001 to modify the design of the subdivision to eliminate two residential lots and reduce the overall amount of grading and fill on the site. A revised tentative tract map, site plan, landscape plan were prepared to reflect the tentative settlement points discussed with staff, all of which were submitted on September 14, 2001 (please refer to Attachment 7 to your staff report). Suggested conditions of approval 2c (page D-2.14) and 3k (page D-2.16), which require formation of a homeowner's association for the purpose of maintaining landscaping within Lots A and B, are inconsistent with our understanding of the settlement points of the dispute and the revised plans as submitted. It was our understanding that these lots were to be offered for dedication to the City and publicly maintained, along with the balance of the existing landscaping on City park property along Edwards Street. While the cost of maintaining this landscaping is minimal (estimated at$100 per month for 3.300 square feet), and incrementally insignificant for the City, the cost of creating legal and budget documents for a homeowner's association for an eight-lot subdivision for the sole purpose of maintaining this landscaping is substantial. 19 Corporate Plaza Drive 949.721.9777 Telephone PLC Land Company Newport Beach, California 92660 949.729.1214 Facsimile PO IC ON We are open to discussing options or alternatives to a private homeowner's association, and request that the wording of the condition be modified to allow for such discussion. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Very truly yours, William D. Holman Planning& Government Relations cc: City Council Members Connie Brockway, City Clerk Howard Zelefsky, Planning Director Robert Beardsley, Public Works Director Gail Hutton, City Attorney a2—ay-02 SUGGESTED FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 99-18/LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT NO. 00-1/ZONIN6 AJAP AMENDMENT NO. 99-2/ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 00-1 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15690 (R)/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 99-14 (RI �� wt SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 99-18: 1. .The Negative Declaration No.`9\9-18 has been prepared in compliance with Article 6 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. It was advertised and available for a public comment period of thirty (30) days. Comments received during the comment period were considered by the City Council prior to action on the Negative Declaration, Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1, Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2, Local Coastal Program Amendment, Tentative Tract Map No. 15690, and Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14. \\ 2. Mitigation measures, incorporated into the at ached conditions of approval, avoid or reduce the project's effects to a point where clearly no significant effect on the environment will occur. 3. There is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the City Council that the project, as mitigated through the conditions of approval for Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1, Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2, Local Coastal Program Amendment, Tentative Tract Map No. 15690, and Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14 will have a significant effect on the environment. SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL—LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT NO. 00-1: 1. The Local Coastal Program amendment to the Huntington Beach Local Coastal Program to modify the boundary of the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan to incorporate the subject property and to establish the RL-1 zoning designation is consistent with the designation for Estate Residential cited in the 1990 Holly Seacliff Specific Plan General Plan Amendment. 2. The proposed change to the Local Coastal Program is in accordance with the policies, standards, and provisions of the Coastal Element that encourages a mix of housing opportunities\that vary in price and type. The proposed land use will provide for future upscale residential opportunities. 3. The development conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. The proposed project will not interfere with public access opportunities provided along the Weider Regional Park, and will not impact public views. SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. 99-2/ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 00-1: 1. Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2 and Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1 to establish a zoning designation of Holly Seacliff Specific Plan (RL-1) on a 2.7 acre parcel, and to incorporate the subject property into the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land 1 uses and ograms specified in the General Plan and any applicable specific plan. The proposed zoning wil e compatible with the adjacent estate residential zoning designations of the Holly Seacliff and Ellis Gol enwest Specific Plans. 2. In the case of a eneral land use provision,the zoning map and text amendment are compatible with the uses authorize in, and the standards prescribed for, the zoning district for which it is proposed. The proposed zoning will allow estate residential uses consistent with the existing land uses in the area. 3. A community need is demonstrated for the change proposed. The new zoning will allow for new single family residential development. 4. Its adoption will be in conformrtvy with public convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice. The proposed zoning will not result in isolated or spot zoning, and will be consistent with the existing Estate Residential General Plan designation. The Holly Seacliff Specific Plan RL-1 allows up to four units per gross acre which is consistent`with the Estate Residential General Plan designation. SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL -TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15690 (R): 1. Tentative Tract Map No. 15690 (R) for a subdivision of approximately 2.7 acres into eight(8) residential lots with two lettered lots for landscaping purposes is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element designation of Estate Residential on the subject property, or any applicable specific plan, or other applicable provisions of this Code. T\he proposed subdivision will be compatible in size and intensity with the adjacent residential developments in the Holly Seacliff and Ellis Goldenwest Specific Plan areas. 2. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of development. The subdivision will involve grading that will provide sufficient rear yards for the eight single family homes without impacting the adjacent Wieder Regional Park site. 3. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not cause serious health problems or substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The eight lot subdivision will have no adverse impacts on any fish or wildlife or their habitats. -4. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision unless alternative easements, for access or for use, will be provided. All necessary easements will be provided with the creation of the parcels and the development of the site. SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N h.99-14 (R): 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14 (R) for the development of a site with greater than a three foot grade differential between the high and low points will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and , improvements in the neighborhood. Based upon the conditions imposed, the development witl be designed to minimize impacts from grading, and will not be detrimental to the surrounding properties. I 2 2. The condonal use permit will be compatible with surrounding uses based on proposed zoning and developme t standards. Any future development of the site will be required to comply with identical development standards set forth in the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan. 3. The proposed eight lot subdivision will comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. In addition, any specific condition required for the proposed use in the district in which it would be located. Any future development will be required to comply with the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan unless separate variances are.approved by the City of Huntington Beach. 4. The granting of the conditional use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan. It is consistent g g � P Y s with the Land Use Element designation of Estate Residential on the subject property SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15690 (R): 1. The tentative map received and dated January 8, 2002 shall be the approved layout. 2. Prior to submittal of the final map to the Public Works Department for processing and approval by the City Council,the following shall be required: a. The Settlement and Release Agreement pertaini to the PLC lawsuit of the Ci 's denial of entitlements associated with the original 10 lot subdivision shall be approved by the City Council. b. The Affordable Housing Agreement Plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. The agreement shall provide for affordable housing on-site or off-site. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of the first building permit for the tract. The contents of the agreement shall include the following: 1) Minimum 15 percent of the units (2 units) shall be affordable to\families of moderate income level (less than 120% of Orange County median) for a period of thirty years. 2) A detailed description of the type, size, location and phasing of the affordable units. 3) If affordable units (new or rehabilitate) are off-site, they must be under the full control of the applicant. 4) The affordable units shall be constructed prior to or concurrent with the primary project. Final approval (occupancy) of the first residential unit in the tract shall be contingent'upon the completion and public availability, or evidence of the applicant's reasonable progress towards attainment of completion, of the affordable units. c. At least 90 days before City Council action on the final map, CC&Rs shall be submitted to,the Planning Department and approved by the City Attorney. The CC&Rs shall reflect the maintenance by the Homeowners' Association of Lots A and B (common landscape areas), exterior of the walls along the east side of Lots 1 and 8, and north side of Lot 1, all open fencing 3 ong the rear lot lines of Lots 2-6 adjacent to the park. The CC&Rs must be in recordable form pr r to recordation of the map. d. The gr a on the sloped landscaped areas adjacent to the park shall not be modified. A covenant restrictin a grading and redesign of the sloped condition shall be recorded on the properties. A copy of the venant shall be reviewed by the City Attorney prior to recordation. A copy of the recorded doc ents shall be submitted to the Planning Department for inclusion in the Tract file. 3. The following condi s shall be completed prior to recordation of the final map unless otherwise stated. Bonding may be substituted for construction in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. (PW) a. A reproducible mylar cop\d a print of the recorded map shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works atthe time of recordation. (PW) b. The engineer or surveyor prepari\the final map shall comply with Sections 7-9-330 and 7-9- 337 of the Orange County SubdivisionCode and Orange County Subdivision Manual, Subarticle 18 for the following items: 1) Tie the boundary of the map into the Hori'z\al Control System established by the County Surveyor. 2) Provide a digital-graphics file of said map to the County of Orange. (PW) c. Provide a digital-graphics file of said map to the City per the following design criteria: 1) Design Specification: a) Digital data shall be full size(1:1) and in compliance with the California coordinate system —STATEPLANE Zone 6 (Lambert Conformal Conic projection),NAD 83 datum in accordance with the County of Orange Ordinance 3809. b) Digital data shall have double precision accuracy(up to fiftee significant digits). c) Digital data shall have units in US FEET. d) A separate drawing file shall be submitted for each individual shee e) Digital data shall be in compliance with the Huntington Beach Stand d Sheets, drawing names,pen color and layering conventions. \ f) Feature compilation shall include, but shall not be limited to: Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APN), street addresses and street names with suffix. 2) File Format and Media Specification: a) Shall be in compliance with the following file format: • AutoCAD (version 13 or later) drawing file: _.DWG b) Shall be in compliance with the following media type: • CD Recordable (CD-R) 650 Megabytes 4 d. The follo g shall be shown as a dedication to the City of Huntington Beach on the Final Map: 1) "A" Street for ublic street purposes. 2) A 2.00 foot wid ublic utility easement as shown on said map(7 ft.parkways or less). 3) The water system d appurtenances as shown on the improvement plans. 4) The sewer system an appurtenances as shown on the improvement plans. 5) The easement for sew urposes as shown on said map. (PW) e. All vehicular access rights to wards Street shall be released and relinquished to the City of Huntington Beach except at loca ' ns approved by the City Council. (PW) f. All improvement securities(Faithful rformance, Labor&Material and Monument Bonds) and Subdivision Agreement shall be po ed with the Public Works Department and approved as to form by the City Attorney. (PW) g. A Certificate of Insurance shall be filed with tXee Public Works Department and approved as to form by the City Attorney. (PW) A h. The Final Map shall be recorded with the County o4 range prior to issuance of building permits. (PW). i. All Public Works fees shall be paid.(PW) j. The area covered by this tentative map shall be annexed to the servoir Hill Assessment District in order to provide Zone 2 water service. All necessary tudies and processing fees shall be paid by the Subdivider. (PW) k. A mechanism such as a Homeowner's Association shall be establish for maintenance responsibility of common areas (Lots A&B). (PW) 1. Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2 and Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1 1 be approved by the City Council. 4. The following conditions shall be completed prior to issuance of a grading perm a. A Grading Plan,prepared by a Licensed Civil Engineer,shall be submitted to the \cntrol Works Department for review and approval. This plan shall also include an erosion and si plan for all water runoff during construction and site preparation work. (PW) b. A Street Improvement Plan,prepared by a Licensed Civil Engineer,shall be submitted to Public Works Department for review and approval. The following improvements shall be s wn on the plan: 1) Curb and gutter, sidewalk, street pavement, signing, striping and street lighting for"A" Stree 5 2) ADA compliant access ramp at the northwest and southwest corners of Edwards Street and " " Street. 3) Se age collection system including individual sewer laterals for each lot. 4) Wat distribution system connecting to the existing 12-inch main in Edwards Street. 5) A new omestic water service and meter for each lot shall be installed per Water Division standard .,and sized to meet the minimum requirements set by the California Plumbing Code (CPC). Th�water service shall be a minimum of 1-inch in size. 6) A separate water service, meter and backflow protection device shall be installed to serve reclaimed water1for common area landscaping (Lots "A" and"B")and for any median landscaping in Ed�AWds Street, unless otherwise approved by the Water Division. (PW) c. In accordance with NPDES equirements, a"Water Quality Management Plan" shall be prepared by a Civil or Environmental gineer. "Best Management Practices" shall be identified and incorporated into the design. (P \ d. A detailed soils analysis shall be pre d by a registered engineer. This analysis shall include on- site soil sampling and laboratory testin f materials to provide detailed recommendations for grading, chemical and fill properties,re ta nng walls, streets, and utilities. (PW) e. A Landscape and Irrigation Plan,prepared by`��icensed Landscape Architect, shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval by the Park, Tree and Landscape Division. The Developer shall submit irrigation deh4ands to ensure proper irrigation demands to ensure proper irrigation service sizing. Plans for temporary erosion control on slopes at rear and sides of lots shall be included. (PW) f. If soil remediation is required, a remediation plan shall be submitted to the Planning, Public Works and Fire Departments for review and approval in accordance with City Specifications No. 431-92 and the conditions of approval. The plan shall include methods to minimize remediation- related impacts on the surrounding properties; details on how all drainage associated with the remediation efforts shall be retained on site and no wastes or pollu `tarts shall escape the site; and shall also identify wind barriers around remediation equipment. (PW) s °t g. The name and phone number of an on-site field supervisor hired by the de�loper shall be submitted to the Departments of Planning and Public Works. In addition, clearly visible signs shall be posted on the perimeter of the site every 250 feet indicating who shalNe contacted for information regarding this development and any construction/grading-related coi erns. This contact person shall be available immediately to address any concerns or issues raised by adjacent property owners during the construction activity. He/She will be responsible for ens ing compliance with the conditions herein, specifically, grading activities,truck routes, co struction hours, noise, etc. Signs shall include the applicant's contact number, City contact(Cong1ruction Manager(714) 536-5431)regarding grading and construction activities, and"1-800-CU MOG" in the event there are concerns regarding fugitive dust and compliance with AQMD Rule 403. (PW) h. The applicant shall notify all property owners and tenants within 300 feet of the perimeter of they: property of a tentative grading schedule at least 30 days prior to such grading. (PW) 6 i. Th developer shall coordinate the development of a truck haul route with the Department of Publ Works if the import or export of material is required. This plan shall include the approx ate number of truck trips and the proposed truck haul routes. It shall specify the hours in which tr port activities can occur and methods to mitigate construction-related impacts to adjacent re 'dents. These plans must include a truck haul route diagram and be submitted for approval to. Department of Public Works Transportation Division. No fees are required for such haul route ermit. (PW) j. The applicant's gra ' g/erosion control plan shall abide by the provisions of AQMD's Rule 403 as related to fugitive dust ontrol. (PW) k. Blockwall/fencing plans (in uding a site plan, section drawings, and elevations depicting the height and material of all re tas 'ng walls,walls, and fences)consistent with the grading plan shall be submitted to and approved b e Planning Department. The plans shall identify materials, seep holes and drainage. 5. During grading operations,the following hall be complied with: a. Due to the proximity of the site to a known cheological site, grading activities during remedial site grading work shall be monitored by an arc ologist. (Mitigation Measure) b. Water trucks will be utilized on the site and shall b vailable to be used throughout the day during site grading to keep the soil damp enough to p vent dust being raised by the operations. (PW) c. All haul trucks shall arrive at the site no earlier than 8:00 a. or leave the site no later than 5:00 p.m., and shall be limited to Monday through Friday only. (P d. Wet down the areas that are to be graded or that are being graded, }the late morning and after work is completed for the day. (PW) \ e. The construction disturbance area shall be kept as small as possible. (PV� f. All haul trucks shall be covered or have water applied to the exposed surface\prior to leaving the site to prevent dust from impacting the surrounding areas. (PW) r, g. Prior to leaving the site, all haul trucks shall be washed off on-site on a gravel surkce to prevent dirt and dust from leaving the site and impacting public streets. (PW) t h. Comply with appropriate sections of AQMD Rule 403,particularly to minimize fugitiv6,,.dust and noise to surrounding areas. (PW) i. Wind barriers shall be installed along the perimeter of the site. (PW) 7 j. Re ediation operations, if required, shall be performed in stages concentrating in single areas at a time minimize the impact of fugitive dust and noise on the surrounding areas. (PW) k. Constructi equipment shall be maintained in peak operating condition to reduce emissions. 1. Use low sulfur 5%)fuel by weight for construction equipment. m. Truck idling shall be hibited for periods longer than 10 minutes. n. Attempt to phase and sche a activities to avoid high ozone days first stage smog alerts. o. Discontinue operation during sond stage smog alerts. 6. The Departments of Planning, Public Woks and Fire are responsible for compliance with all conditions of approval herein as noted aft"h condition. The Planning Director and Public Works Director shall be notified in writing if any chafes to tract map are proposed as a result of the plan check process. Permits shall not be issued until tl�e Planning Director and Public Works Director have reviewed and approved the proposed changes for&�rmance with the intent of the City Council's action and the conditions herein. If the proposed c es are of a substantial nature, an amendment to the original entitlement may be required pursuant to th&HBZSO. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL—CONDJT14WAL USE PERMIT NO. 99-14 1. The site plan received and dated January 8, 2002 shall be the concb"ly approved layout with the following modifications: a. The final site plan,floor plans,building elevations, and fencing pl \ hall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Commission. Any deviation from develo ment standards specified in the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan shall be subject to review and approv&of a variance by the Planning Commission. `y\ b. Lots 3-6 shall be provided with one additional off-street parking space pursuant to the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan for lots with 30 ft. frontages. c. The perimeter tract fencing along the west and north property lines shall be of open rought iron design as noted on the site plan sections drawings,with the exception that the rear(no ) of Lot 1 be designed of solid masonry material. d. Depict all utility apparatus, such as but not limited to back flow devices and Edison transf�ners on the site plan. Utility meters shall be screened from view from public rights-of-way. Elecl�ic transformers in a required front or street side yard shall be enclosed in subsurface vaults. Backflow prevention devices shall be prohibited in the front yard setback and shall be screened from view. (Code Requirement) 8 e. epict all gas meters,water meters, electrical panels, air conditioning units,mailbox facilities and si ilar items on the site plan and elevations. If located on a building,they shall be architecturally desi ed into the building to appear as part of the building. They shall be architecturally comp a Ne with the building and non-obtrusive, not interfere with sidewalk areas and comply with required tbacks. f. If outdoor lig ' g is included,energy saving lamps shall be used. All outside lighting shall be directed to prev t"spillage" onto adjacent properties and shall be shown on the site plan and elevations. 2. Prior to submittal for bu' ing permits,the following shall be completed: a. Zoning entitlement condition of approval shall be printed verbatim on one of the first three pages of all the working drawing sets sed for issuance of building permits(architectural, structural, electrical,mechanical and plumb )and shall be referenced in the sheet index. The minimum font size utilized for printed text sh be 12 point. b. All Fire Department requirements shall noted on the building plans. (FD) c. An engineering geologist shall be engaged to bmit a report indicating the ground surface acceleration from earth movement for the subjec roperty. All structures within this development shall be constructed in compliance with the g-facto as indicated by the geologist's report. Calculations for footings and structural members to 'thstand anticipated g-factors shall be submitted to the City for review prior to the issuance o uilding permits. (Code Requirement) d. Floor plans shall depict natural gas and 220V electrical shal stubbed in at the location of clothes dryers;natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations cooking facilities,water heaters and central heating units. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits,the following shall be complet a. Construct off-site drainage improvements as required by the Department f Public Works to mitigate impact of increased runoff,due to development,or deficient down am drainage systems. Design of all necessary drainage improvement shall provide mitiga 'on for all rainfall event frequencies up to a 100-year frequency. (PV ) b. All landscape planting,irrigation and maintenance shall comply with the City Ar 'cultural and Landscape Standards and Specifications. (PW) c. The Consulting Arborist(approved by the City Landscape Architect)shall review the fin landscape tree-planting plan and approve in writing the selection and locations proposed f new trees and the protection measures and locations of existing trees to remain. Existing trees to remain shall also be addressed by said Arborist with recommendations/requirements for prote tion during construction. Said Arborist report shall be incorporated onto the Landscape Architect's plans as construction notes and/or construction requirements. The report shall include the Arborist's name,certificate number and the Arborist's wet signature on the final plan. (PW) 9 d. An A tomatic sprinkler and fire alarm system shall be installed throughout if the building gross square otage exceeds 5000 sq. ft. Shop drawings shall be submitted and approved by the Fire Departm t prior to system installation. (FD) e. Fire hydrants all be installed prior to combustible construction. Prior to installation, shop drawings shall b ubmitted to the Public Works Department and approved by the Fire Department. Indic a hydrant locations and fire department connections. (FD) f. Fire access roads shall b rovided in compliance with City Specification No. 401. Include the Circulation Plan and dime ions of all access roads. (FD) g. Submit a Fire Protection Plan ' ompliance with City Specification No. 426 for Fire Department approval.(FD) \ h. The project shall comply with all prove 'ons of the HBFC and City specification 422, Well Abandonment. (FD) i. The project shall comply with all provisions o 4theHBMC Section 17.04.085 and City Specification 429,Methane District Building Pit Requirements. (FD) j. Installation and/or removal of underground flammab or combustible liquid storage tanks shall comply with Orange County Environmental Health an FD requirements. Treatment areas may require conformance to City Specification No. 431, Fired Appliances. (FD) k. Address numbers shall be installed to comply with City Speci ation No. 428. (FD) 1. Street names shall be approved by the Fire Department. Please re to City Specification No. 409. (FD) 4` 4. The structure(s) cannot be occupied,the final building permit(s) cannotbe approved, and utilities cannot be released for the first residential unit until the following\#as been completed: a. A section of existing curb, gutter and sidewalk along Edwards Street must be moved and replaced. Existing street tree(s)must be inspected by the City of Huntington 136ch, Park,.Trees and Landscape Inspector during removal of concrete and prior to construction of " Street improvements. Tree replacement or root/tree protection,will be specified upon the\inspection of the root system. (PV ) !. b. All landscape irrigation and planting installation shall be certified to be in conformance the City approved landscape plans by the Landscape Architect of record in written form to the City, Landscape Architect prior to the final landscape inspection and approval. (PV ) c. Applicant shall provide the City with Microfilm copies(in City format) and CD(AutoCAD only) copy of complete City approved landscape construction drawings as stamped"Permanent File 10 Copy"prior to starting landscape work. Copies shall be given to the City Landscape Architect for pX ecord. (PV) d. ibiting the removal of the open view fencing along the perimeter of the west and nnes shall be recorded with the County Recorder's Office. The covenant shall be s Planning Department,and shall be reviewed as to form by the City Attorney's f the recorded covenant shall be filed with the Planning Department. 5. Prior to final building pletTmt inspection and approval of the first residential unit, the following shall be completed: a. Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein shall be accomplished and verified by the Planning Department. b. All building spoils, such as unusab lumber,wire,pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off-site faci "ty equipped to handle them. 6. The Planning Director ensures that all conditi of approval herein are complied with. The Planning Director shall be notified in writing if any chan\chges Ite plan,elevations and floor plans are proposed as a result of the plan check process. rmits shall not be issued until the Planning Director has reviewed and approved the proposfor conformance with the intent of the City Council's action and the conditions herein. If thchanges are of a substantial nature, an amendment to the original entitlement may be rsuant to the HBZSO. 7. Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14 (R) shall not become effec 've until Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1 and Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2 have been approve by the City Council and are in effect. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS—TE �'ATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15690 (R)/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 99-14(R): 1. Tentative Tract Map No. 15690 (R)and Conditional Use Permit No. 99-1 (R) shall not become effective until the Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1 and Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2 have been approved by the City Council and are in effect. \ 2. Tentative Tract Map No. 15690 (R)and Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14 (R)s11 become null and void unless exercised within two years of the date of final zoning text amendment and zoning map amendment approval or such extension of time as may be granted by the Directbx pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the°expiration date. 3. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Tentative Tract Map No. 15690(R)*d Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14 (R),pursuant to a public hearing for revocation, if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance or Municipal Lode occurs. 11 4. The de lopment shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code,Building Division, d Fire Department as well as applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards,,except as noted herein. 5. Standard landsca code requirements apply (Chapter 232 of the ZSO). (PW) 6. The Water Ordinance . 14.52,the"Water Efficient Landscape Requirements"apply for projects with 2500 square eet of landscaping or larger. (PW) 7. All applicable Public Works fe'e�shall be paid prior to map recordation. (PW) 8. Traffic impact fees shall be paid at 4ate of$150 per daily trip($14,400). (PW) 4Y, 9. An Encroachment Permit is required for all work within the City's right-of-way. (PW) 10. Park and recreation in-lieu fees shall be paid, r accrued credits assigned,prior to Council approval of the final map. 11. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of'$43 for the posting of the Notice of Determination at the County of Orange Clerk's Office`\The check shall be made out to the County of Orange and submitted to the Planning Depar*nt within two(2)days of the City Council's action. 12. Construction shall be limited to Monday- Saturday 7:00 AM tr$:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. 13. All landscaping shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner,and in onformance with the HBZSO. Prior to removing or replacing any landscaped areas, check wi the Departments of Planning and Public Works for Code requirements. Substantial changes m require approval by the Planning Commission. 12 ATTACHMENT 3 ORDINANCE NO. 3536 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ZONING AND SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE BY ESTABLISHING A HOLLY SEACLIFF SPECIFIC PLAN(SP-9) ZONING DESIGNATION ON REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF EDWARDS STREET, SOUTH OF ELLIS AVENUE (ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. 99-2) WHEREAS, pursuant to the State Planning and Zoning Law, the Huntington Beach Planning Commission and Huntington Beach City Council have held separate public hearings relative to Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2, wherein both bodies have carefully considered all information presented at said hearings, and after due consideration of the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission and all evidence presented to said City Council, the City Council finds that such zone change is proper, and consistent with the General Plan, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. That certain real property, generally located on the west side of Edwards Street, south of Ellis Avenue, and more particularly described in the legal description attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein, is hereby zoned Holly Seacliff Specific Plan. (District Map No. 38) SECTION 2. The Director of Planning is hereby directed to amend Sectional District Map 38Z of the Huntington Beach Zoning & Subdivision Ordinance so as to reflect the changes contained in this ordinance. The Director of Planning is further directed to file the amended map. A copy of such map, as amended, shall be available for inspection in the Office of the City Clerk. I PDA:2002 Ordinances:ZMA99-2 Ord.No.3536 SECTION 3 This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19thday of February , 2002. Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk ,,4 City Attorney ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: '41u City Adm' strator "iyctorof ing 2 ADA:2002 Ordinances:ZMA99-2 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION Ord.No.3536 FOR TENTATIVE TRACT M.4.F I5690 PLC ANNEXATION TO CITY OF HUNITNGTON BEACH BENCY A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECT;OY 34, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE '1 i WEST, SAN: BERNARDINO BASE -AND MERIDIAN, IN THE UNINCORPORATED �TERRITOXY OF THE COUNTY; OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN OIN .THE MAP RECORDED: IN BOOK 51, PAGE 13 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS IN THE`%.OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY,MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE NORTHERLY LIEF OF PARCEL 1 AS SHOWN ON THE MAP FILED IN BOOK 42, PAGE 25 OF PARCEL N- iAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, SAID POINT BEING ON A LINE PARALLEL WnH AND WESTERLY 40.00 FEET FROM THE EAST LR41 :OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE NORTH 99"5259" WEST,,415.00 FEET,ALOP16 THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1;THENCE NORTH 00°16'06"EAST 130.00 FEET;TFiLNCE NORTH 16@31'52" EAST 50.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 45°58'31"- EAST 190.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°43'54" EAST 265.00 FEET .TO SAID\AFOREMENTIONED LINE BEING PARALLEL WITH AND WESTERLY 40.00 FEET FROM THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION-34; THENCE SOUTH 0001606" WEST 312.00 FEET ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE TO TICE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAIN 'G AN AREA OF 2.71 ACRES,MORE OR LESS. �Of ESS! im 8t v Cl�L�� . VWDEN & LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR SOCIAZ,ES ANN TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 15690 OF PLC ANNEXATION TO CITY 01 HUNTINGTON BEACH CWM E?l0lN?VM%--)CA.WS,is—U.va SERVITOR. W.O.No.0879-396.3 Date 7/1/98 M13 mWAx.$Urre:10•I IN&CA rs:: Eng.D.C. Chk. D.W. Sheet I of I 7MOC-0i1G FAX:SW-0411 Ord.No.3536 89% ' .(A .1 . ` NW 114, SEC. 34 Ews AM" 5W L4, SEG. 94- N T4354 W to t All $ TEN TA Ti VE Ta 7RAGT NO. 15690 H Cole rG' P 2.71 AG. PLY Luc, N M25•?' W 415DO, SW 114. 60. 34 NLY LUC, FARM 1 PM. 42M v n v OE ESS t�#r32 t V VALE*- AI�UEN & VM 70.ACUMA T A\- MAL t}UMMON FOR � SSQCIATES TWA77Vf IMT xa MV 13012 CC3TAN SE 210, INI, 92614 , . No q-.S%.%3 ...' ; - CeY (849)•edo-0110 FAX: SaC-0415 t Engr--P.&—Chk-2Y,.— Shea+L?— Ord. No. 3536 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, CONNIE BROCKWAY, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing ordinance was read to said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 4th day of February, 2002, and was again read to said City Council at a reLyular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of February, 2002, and was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council. AYES: Dettloff,Bauer, Cook, Boardman, Winchall NOES: None ABSENT: Green, Houchen ABSTAIN: None I,Connie Brockway CITY CLERK of the City of Huntington Beach and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council,do hereby certify that a synopsis of this ordinance has been published in the Independent on ,2002 In accordance with the City Charter of said City City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk Connie Brockway, City Clerk of the City Council of the City Deputy City Clerk of Huntington Beach, California ATTACHMENT 4 ORDINANCE NO. 3537 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HOLLY SEACLIFF SPECIFIC PLAN TO INCORPORATE REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF EDWARDS STREET APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET SOUTH OF ELLIS AVENUE (ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 00-1) WHEREAS,pursuant to the California State Planning and Zoning Law, the Huntington Beach Planning Commission and Huntington Beach City Council have held separate, duly noticed public hearings to consider whether or not to amend the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance by amending the boundary of the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan to incorporate approximately 2.7 acres of real property; and After due consideration of the findings and recommendation of the Planning Commission and all other evidence presented, the City Council finds that the aforesaid amendment is proper and consistent with the General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1. That the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan is hereby amended to incorporate approximately 2.7 acres of real property, generally located on the west side of Edwards Street, south of Ellis Avenue, and more particularly described in the legal description attached hereto as Exhibit"A" and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein. SECTION 2. The Director of Planning is hereby directed to amend the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan to incorporate the changes shown in the legislative draft materials (text and exhibits) attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein. i PDA:2002 Ordinances:=00-1 Rls 00-582 Ord.No.3537 SECTION 3. That this ordinance shall become effective thirty(30) days after its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of February , 2002. laztie" 64kow Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: /- 23- City Clerk 02 -2b-02 C City Attorney ATTEST: APP OVED AS TO FORM: City AdiTinistrator rector. of Pl ing 2 PDA:2002 Ordinances:=00-1 Rls 00-582 EXHIBIT A LEG.41 DESCRIPTION Ord.No.3537 FOR TENTATM TRACT M.AP 15690 PLC ANNEXATION TO CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE '11 WEST, SAN' BERNARDINO BASE 'AND MERIDIAN, IN THE UNINCORPORATED_ -TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY. OF ORANGFn STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON THE MAP RECORDED�IN BOOK 51, PAGE 13 OF MCSCELLANEOUS MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THIS COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY,MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE NORTHERLY LIEF OF PARCEL 1 AS SHOWN ON THE MAP FILED IN BOOK 42, PAGE 25 OF PARCEL MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY; SAID POINT BEING ON A LINE PARALLEL Vam AND WESTERLY 40.00 FEET FROM THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUtHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE NORTH 89*32159" WEST 415.00 FEET,ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1;THENCE NORTH 00*16'06"EAST 130.06 FEET;THENCE NORTH 16°31'52" EAST 50.00 FEET; THENCE--NORTH 45"58'31" EAST 190.00 FEET; 'DICE SOUTH 89"43'54" EAST 265.00 FEET-':TO SAID AFOREMENTIONED LINE BEING PARALLEL WITH AND WESTERLY 40:00 FEET FROM THE EAST DINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION'-34; THENCE SOUTH 00°16'06"_VraT 312.00 FEET ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING AN AREA OF 2.71 ACRES,MORE OR LESS. �4F ESS/ 19�OZ V CA��E VW�� LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR SOIATES TENTATTVE TRACT MAP 15690,OF PLC ANNEXATION TO CITY OF HUNnNGTON BEACH C[NII.ENGlhEE><3.-TLANYFai3—L�Wp S AVIYORr, W.O.NO.0979-396.3 1Date V1198 Wil COWAN.SUM:10•MVINF,CA 915:: Eng.D.C. C,h[, D.W. 1 of I 71Mit<-4119 FAX.M4.0619 Ord.No.3537 A. HW 114, "CO.-4 A.US AM" 5W 114, SfL. 94 { 8T 4�� W N � TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 15690 H cold no, F 2.71 AG. r =Dot � ftr Lug, 5W 114. SAC. u (V mZ2'5T W 4 5D0' ___j NLl' Lff. PARGEL 1 FM. 42M *� a o�E9s 1B#�2 t sue: s*-= UM TO.acC*fAhT A A MEN term De�MPVCx FOR MTATIYf TWT Na i.WO 13012 CUTAN: S= 210 ram, Cl 926A W.O. No 0879-W-3 (649)•ewc-0110 FAX. eefl-0418 Engr DAChk. ?— EXHIBIT B Ord.No.3537 C. Project Area Description Location 5 The Specifiic,Plan covers565-icres located in the central portion of the City of Huntington Beach as depicted in Exhibit 1 (Vicinity Map). A legal description of properties included in the Specific Plan project area may be found in Section V. Present land uses surrounding the site include Huntington Central Park,Ocean View Mobile Estates'and industrial uses to the north;residential and office uses to the east;the Huntingtoh Beach Civic Center,Huntington Beach High School, Seacliff'Country Club and residential uses to the south; and the Bolsa Chica lowlands to the west. The Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan excludes properties contained in the previously adopted Ellis-Goldenwest Specific Plan. Exhibit 2 illustrates the existing zoning within the Specific Plan area. Regional access to the project site is provided from the San Diego Freeway(I- 405)directly from the Goldenwest interchange. Pacific Coast Highway(State Highway 1)provides access from coastal areas to the north and south. Local access is provided via Edwards,Goldenwest, Gothard and Main Streets and Ellis, Garfield and Yorktown Avenues. D. Planning Background There are a number of previous approvals related to land use regulations affecting the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan Area. These previous,approvals include:_ 1. The Ellis-Goldenwest Specific Plan,approved by the Huntington Beach City Council through its adoption of Ordinance No:2998 on June 26, 1989. (Not a part of the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plar.) 2. . Final Environmental Impact Report No. 88-2 prepared for the Ellis- Goldenwest Specific Plan(adopted on May 1, 1989,by Resolution No. 6022). 3. Holly-Seacliff General Plan Amendment No. 89-1 approved by the City Council through its adoption of Resolution No. 6098 on January 8 .1990. .4. Final Environmental Impact Report No. 89-1 prepared for the Holly- Seacliff General Plan Amendment(adopted on January 8, 1990,by Resolution No. 6097). 5. Holly-Seacliff Development Agreement No. 90-1 (adopted on November 5, 1990, by Ordinance No. 3080). I-2 (hssp98) Ord.No.3537 �O to s. W W C C SLATER AVENUE O 3 N ~ H W 3 TALBERT AVENUE T 3 CENTRAL c PARK �T O ELUS AVENUE j•""' f• GARFIELD AVENUE :.; .21 •' _ YORKTOY,N AVENUE -� '1..•• ✓� HIGH �CMC SCHOOL CENTER A VE SFACLIFF ADAMS AVENUE COUNTRY CLUB J W tu 1 ? of O m C < O1� O Z V < O W . p m OC m y�G EXHIBIT VICINITY MA CITY nOF HUN(/TINGTON BEACH MR y yVL3.7 TY Yp�vLOFF �� _ l4 •' •I►ptttlte, mi to 1 •-IR•CD II•,w►uA•, ��-..-�..���Y ---1 -- Ml-o-cD �!*r'�• ,«..n^•..,L I MI.01 IR2 a... RA1111:� :`•rw:M:: �1 .—J•,,, Y ,............r! -0 0.10A —.� RA-0-CD I ELLIS-GOLDENWEST SPECIFIC PLAN RA-0 or lacy' WD•01 MI•CI! or nA- Or R2 •��..` I •... ar RA-0 Or: .�. C-CZ ,... '�. •r..._: • - I/1 Cil-0 Q MI MI �R2,I 2-01 d o RA-0 Rz ,'- MI-A �40 u. .. e.. RA-0R2 quoi M i;j•r �•. k14 rn•rv. '^, M2-01-CC !..if RZ mi :7•- •" dr'•'1••. •.V•i .�� i �' R1•q 1 r �'V 'JC6.t !•p •-.,I — i a. �!•:i; ! •.� li• �u••'''i; .. - ewe�.� 5... p. ! -r.uR , 1 121 ..19�r,_� •- ;. , �e7.t 1• .w,wf/„��:... •" �R4 a»u•..:�. '1 •nl 'M8 J C2-0• • `�' r. ».... ROS-0 nl RI 1 n:•o•ro 1 ' +4'aAI 12•0 R�•q' r , RI ••`•. ....1•'",.r 'i('i•'wl ,• � ✓ ;<,;� ! M»..� .ro nl 1 .2.0-CD Ci2-0 w�- ROS'O ' !:�� RI 1 RI s"SC•�r L•c.: r '."2,u► I�I�. !;..��t•o ''�:� �i'� 1 ��.,i° RI 1��� ..JwA-drrM.'-r Mrl lf�' `.•y�•�.w.l�t���= !,� ! . � ,fz' � ar•a•� I. I • OP OCD 4 •o''% �o r�; ROS-0 � RI C2-0-CD vi{'St If/ all :17 e coact rr ~�r.'••i�h:.,- ♦•!... 1 •• R4-01�/ ••r••ri rp9 ,' 1 !•�, CF-E-CD Not C wWu% J R2.0-co l; *•• �' a ,r AI•►p 0•c. ROS-0 rn„r �-�t- �. ,? •'. "�ICF-E-CD, �r 1 k(�D'0r41 Z � ,� .. --�- EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH EXISTING ZONING 01 Lmn10 L�',L if -�E V I� lrr AA lnl F. � 8 lr'l S�9 lf"9�' lr L l;-J 11V .101111111 I I !� j ! Ay, tt1MNNN1VNtM0tNMl1 M ( � MrM . Q tAM NMN1f NfRIfMRAI f mad 019 ��•' NMM fi MMw Q tOMNIIfr NtNN�Id'l f tlffNNI N01a NtrwI" � wwrr •••••, RL•1 .�� O•M�NNwn 1 -�. •1 \ Nrwt \\` Q wu Nrnonrult r•. COIWENC" 14 [LimaalaENWrrT SFKCWIC rLAN -- .r fNA1fTMAl AREA • I ,( RM Q anN NACE iiH N -_ ME PLANNING AREA 05 i F7 .— F, 1.1 ►lANY1M0 Volt? RMH CKI Rl•r � Nf10Nf ORMOO•fANNf 03 i •7 . "A y R 1UIJ,f pM ' Ui 111-3/4 RW C ; - - —'R• o+ min - •. soma sJ ] NJ +( • � � rao WASIALIM founNARr--� r • o a EXHIBIT 3 0 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PLAN TABLE 1 HOLLY-SEACLIFF SPECIFIC PLAN Ord.No.3537 LAND USE TABLE PLANNING :PLANNING LAND-USE CATEGORY. GROSS• TOTAL MAXIMUM. .AVERAGE DEV. =AREA - UNIT ACRES UNITS . GROS§ GROSS STANDS. :DENSITY DENSITY . (PAGE) 1 1-1 \RESIDENTIAL-LOW DENSITY 1 -6-9 .15 4 a-.&-(,b 111-10 1-2 RESIDENTIAL-LOW DENSITY 1 26 90 4 3.5 111-10 1-3 REtkDENTIAL-LOW DENSITY 1 16 55 4. 3.4 I11-10 1-4 OPEN`SPACE 16 I11-32 SUBTOTAL \ 64 160 II II-1 RESIDENTIAL-LOW DENSITY 3 62• 310 7 4.1 III-16 11-2 RESIDENTIAL-MEDIUM DENSITY 40 415 15 11.0 III-20 11-3 RESIDENTIAL-MEDIUM DENSITY 34• 390 15 13.0 III-20 11-4 RESIDENTIAL-MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY 9 170 25 16.6 III-23 11-5 RESIDENTIAL-MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY 4 75 25 18.8 111-23 II-6 RESIDENTIAL-MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY 4 75 25 18.8 III-23 II-7 RESIDENTIAL-MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY 6 100 25 16.6 III-23 II-8 INDUSTRIAL 32 111-31 SUBTOTAL 191 1,535 III III-1 RESIDENTIAL-MEDIUM DENSITY 19 285 15 15.0 111-20 I11-2 RESIDENTIAL-LOW DENSITY 2 105 397 7 3.8 111-13 111-3/4 RESIDENTIAL-LOW DENSITY 3 21 86 5 5 111-16 111-5/7 RESIDENTIAL-LOW DENSITY 3 26" 119 5 5 111-16 III-6 COMMERCIAL 11 III-31 I11-8 OPEN SPACE 16 III-32 SUBTOTAL 198 887 IV IV-1 RESIDENTIAL-MEDIUM DENSITY 16 155 15 9.7 III-20 N-2 RESIDENTIAL-MEDIUM DENSITY 8 120 15 15.0 111-20 N-3 INDUSTRIAL 9\ 111-31 IV-4 MIXED DEVELOPMENT 53 165 25 14.4 111-25 IV-5 INDUSTRIAL 22 I11-31 IV-6 COMMERCIAL 4 III-31 SUBTOTAL 112 44,0 TOTAL 565 3,02 ' Includes 4-acre Neighborhood Park. Includes 5-acre Neighborhood Park. (hSSF l � Ord.No.3537 RL-1 ■ ' ■oer.■o.81V-VAC L— s ■ 1' � L � o F2 !, 90 Du � W 1-4 OS1-3 I RL-1 r 16 AC 55 Du COASTALZONE/ BOUNDARY——* NOTE: See ahibit 10 for Land=pe Lnend. EXHIBIT 4 PLANNING AREA I CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH DEVELOPMENT PLAN f 100 i V_8'_`_LS_C L 9FFF ARAf=,-1,� �S =c;=1 =___�_ �a��tn�t ! _sue - - - LEGEND gun-aid" •MMM omme dM�wN �MMwA/w dPow, -MIL. MYMMw ~009 WJOgMONMAI •Lw�M.1N� hvmwwommv �rW�ww IW M�NI/�4 �MIMMAw�II MMiwM1rMMN��M��A r...�. RL•t 4Lw.MMd W b«w pM N OdwA LhM MM' RW `'. RM a d `+ roerM�ttoo�wer��� cw"Owl"WEST AW •Fecxa►uN cftd w w.r.LA AREA noONSW IWwwa •LwA-W~ RM u..w%ad NUrMrPwIMMMrA R H a•«+w�wL NMI OS w..r RL•t w.�w.w.,.r�wwe.�w RAH �,w,.u�wi►M wr•+rwrww OS RM C O RW 1 RM 09 � RL-3 '— RL•1 \ a.,noM. MO NOUs V— 1 a EXHIBIT 8 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CIRCULATION PLAN Q!ol,lll ,. i MWI w �' ClrftAlMtll L E G E N D '3 �` � .www• CUM!wl sla •�w.':::�t.{'<;'r;E _ 1 �� A 1 � ® rarurrArr reA+l Vu �<e Xn�t Ifs,;ry $}S a (MIAt,AW > :fif:`( N61 NCIIAIIpN MIA W.. , i;<... kr4J ICINIC COftgOf RM NANt►Of1Af10M/ uj., •8 ":3Y2% f z •: "AK totfaof Y s'YY k ' RL-1 [ltlC•COLpE1rN![!T ,•f�♦ VEMIC PLAN }F f It m At IDINWIND IN k ` AREA 1'I60 Na1 1 ICt1A11014 UIMINI RM k':gRMH a t � .f.y7 '!tca•. MMM Y ♦: RMH is a if:fs: r RM C .. aw RM �¢ �fi;.r��a►f`A 1 RW RM 1 AL- S P ti 1 i Mo I • 4 ; Co"Ta Tow tOUNOMIY r EXHIBIT 9 OPEN SPACE ' w CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH A W V I1;I c) LI L,ti71,S EAUG'L 11IFF naL a 6r". [I U pL A M a�►n����� ft"UM 79 RL-t J. AM -�-Rtrt I _00tormwEll ec rLANAMA / I AM RMH OS I MH 06 -�.. L RMH 4 AM c ._ _,�•�: RLa c I AM OS1� RL.7 AM �• / �MMw MD �I 1 EXHIBIT 10 a Drainage and Sewer Systems o CITY OF HUN INGTON BEACH INFRASTRUCTURE SCHEMATIC PLAN W V HOLD iLY-SEACUFF MM SPE" CORC PLAN x •, .,, L E � ENd t; t ® PQU MWMII MMM�rA, Q NMaw�rru�� ""t-.i—irx�a:rs'iEiilse�ll^ ` i-yrrrn nr"r•"'�"�rasn+.sw�*.-�+.+ �`''+w... _..•" „r �> 1�Mw�w M4N� wool �.••M. RL•1 � � t dot" RLa f.�^'1/ RM 3 RL•1 «VI CIFIC PLAN I�•� , ARC . t / RAI rya � RMH �•� OS t� Rl•i I RMH I '•w. 09 RMH c L'l�lt3lt[•1s!( swmwi.-rxnsr• l� u::�r•- '....:_� ..... _ ..... � \•�`• RM 0 RLd RM i 05414+ /. Rw MD COASTAL ZM EXHIBIT 11 0 Water Systems CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INFRASTRUCTURE SCHEMATIC PLAN w W Itn'IC)LLV--SEACLOFF AREA SPECORC PLAN L EG END . I .�,,, AIlOIAttlAM1�10t •'�,.• �y',p�OO�MMRtMMMArt '�� t•�NYI h..M M.brM•Grr wt a..hrh■wp•� RL.1_ NtAM..AtN.t ~w` M.iwrdr� �• RL-7 �" .. �. •�� tu�MtontttawA II A•yM1.Ypi...N..M.r PLA" RW ..w.a..taawr Iuec,tic�uw AREA b7 O irti�iit�tNrau 1 t' RMkr I w.MM•tir�.rw l 1 q.•r.w•r.q M..ww NMN � «wyn.a.w, N M� ®MOawaraaun�� A.wMM.MMiYr, OS R� • OS � 7a IMhtl �fwt as w•t2o RM Rw cRM os IV ,y RL-3 �y t ry �+� IV-0 RM �._ . tAi1T1N1 •_i�ibi.. I.rA..wr. I11 o Aou�oA�r—• r m* 'O a EXHIBIT 12 0 CITY nnOF\V'HUNI?TIINGnTON BEACH PLAN COMMUNITYTHEME PLAN ;--' r� l�lr► N f Unl�tl� U �JL�i(i-'J�L�O��/i�1W154=�1 �11�1��01�'ll� dNGlllll ( I � � LEGEND COAtTALICNIBOUNDARY _.• `- —•------�'---�T..�.� ��•«r.•1'�.. /~ �4, \ A10U1/f.INOIOION/ pj •a tt 7� r'. IN r, � OwMMM•�w•-• - or 0-� V4 IV O� Yin"-asiYi- O CL " EXHIBIT 16 ITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACHITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH OVERLAY AREASAREAS N 10ILL c-SEACL�,OG�(FAQGA SPCCOFOC PLANQ������ � � �� Ord. No. 3537 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, CONNIE BROCKWAY,the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven;that the foregoing ordinance was read to said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 4th day of February, 2002, and was again read to said City Council at a regyular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of February,2002, and was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council. AYES: Dettloff, Bauer, Cook,Boardman, Winchall NOES: None ABSENT: Green, Houchen ABSTAIN: None 1,Connie Brockway CITY CLERK of the City of Huntington Beach and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council,do hereby certify that a synopsis of this ordinance has been published in the Independent on ,2002 In accordance with the City Charter of said City City Clerk and ex-officlo Clerk Connie Brockway,City Clerk of the City Council of the City Deputy City Clerk of Huntington Beach, California ATTACHMENT 5 REV15ED TENTATIVE MAP X x 4a4 /.. ,�.�r�R,Gf>•,� TRACT NO. 15690 / gllh' � lm s°.rt. ImnAa wr so.rt. ia3 \ iv / I / ---.. �w�rr°rnn�sr M nrullosna�n sar r°rlvlr s wiml ec°am��riau rr. rrxa[aan rrvs. I q/�J//�ii1 -/iJJ -- fors•.•ro r wort Iwosul[fors r / 1 . "\.... �.!%/� j / / � / �•' I I 1 ®Ir im ra K GR�MMNLfM e[KMO[[ '__ L'?s i _.... •A'Sr EEr QsUB(_IGJ ,. nmrosmrarrca esmnul�arlaaR \. \. / !�. A•96. '' s. rnsrw ulD IlR:auro �.; u.z !i%!,< �c• I ` •A• * c. �o urD usarsmnul r' ,' D/IrlrlwrGl eNGI�G) � " �/ �--✓ : I -. I .o� � eRCRw samaNa�misall carrrr C f-� j j -=-- ._..._.,....__.. I i '1(w• '/ [ ,.rso Gewnau.s srnwl IaRalr rnr s lorarm nos u s / - r°—— m9a aw R31RL s � �� /� �,- are. s�° I � � .. � •nou rAu n., ss x ✓ - o , ......� Accra r 'A-5T EE7. x si L ..�'/ Q .._. A I I I TRE,I 861aN N LGWCWI[NA[I I I I`[lID[L°�°r`SIGGV 9xAa HYIOR MAGI,LA 9Ww \... I ][. xn, /I,I •3' •:) ILA NWRr-,m rxID—mv, xsJ.9 l.i I �1 �� e R�r w� [ sl�Rrwi y�sowRs Rwrra•Assacurts / Y i""�. L I �Y IiD-J I J (e� I r L I I I1-—� ruurl nw a mr wort wa.sort a I �:.,. n•veu • 9 R., 19 ` I CI V uolw rrvrr.u uR en[.a acR IA _ I WV vnrnw wv,ro-I,R uaort ,I xJao >t� JJ x•me s / TLy+I I I x la.e I I x ia3 n o I7I \��' [� msnc rmro ru nAr vGu[i c.r. B-B rGR[ srrz 9rulr c.r. R ',�,�-L�a.s �• .x I+ 1 Ruart nel [ Rkr ro ao � ^ter-'r—� � � �— < __ �• x 3 I 11 I ro., i �r [ f � , I 1 IGrt x h0.9 r""' \ j .� \\ ir.l I 1 ( __ [•nR 1[0l'0YY I s rp4R5 r1[LKC 51AY! N Ari.� � � I � I - [rTANIG rAu 3 \ lrrr°' [oe ris lo°Cr ra� R�NDIab I / I 09E 5IA VI'1 I �I.n -_I C [mrw smw L°. wurzs uw e,sn 555 I sa, wn,Rs am,R.lw I I r �Rs marosm wlu /" 49, NO• j I L L SEGiION G� i,R. wuRisumpOwa'wy"`L ruurts Ar dux[ I I I wrlRe for Ar9rR x 90,9 I 9 —'-'..{ —ffs rmrcrmi w na RESE VOIR — — x' I I —C_ wYJRA mlW WA" _ I I I it INo. b�s3- ww,ai msrta foso uGl �'° A4 � � macr 1 i1 ��ro -[YI rp4rt 123) -. V.. , o°o° — wrArrsni5�;ruwlRDo ( xJl' ale AK. 0 wrARS AWDalfo a<[rIL ._ 3 .:_� f " ::1 r .. •I I ' \^_ l— G'r IT•rtma i PREPARED FOR: 71 xhl+ r�— � am ' rlr•�.. r REVISED wanlrr nar ALDEI.1 ar ,D„o, ro su9[ SSOCIATES oAn:e Is er TENTATIVE MAP LRef[ttm:e.t. ' li«:•":'•l•e+«I• TRACT NO. 15690 �[[* 1 HUNTWOTON BEACH.CAWFONNIA I ATTACHMENT 6 REVISED SITE PLAN TRACT0. 15690 rto¢:vr ror 5a.rr. 16NAQ !11/ � �*ARNQ rl l[!r.N D[RYCb 451�6W.tl IIInM H1NB/!60N1 man i IDI. J. A5Y59QS IAICQ.Ip9:DO-OC-R i l I AasA¢+in sc LM-rAID�NorlarilNxaerar WK ! rors 'I f. ..., i ..i: a' : f~ .. W STREET QAIG) �. nonSm raNc:N-eemnDl uN merry Wd sw anmr fws AYIMI ,e,s 4 a nmroem lno 1¢lmnur I 1 �� 1 I 1 _ .'nI � seen•arr a Nmsra cloy!rn¢r 28 I )'.Inlcsam¢er��iasws5 nm 1 - n5enoe w�a mmue rmexr`1 2AR''. fRY' ''�— Do a a� wlEs oe r r s AYRa[Y maaD 1 .. _ rD aNmn sr h I FI I'. / S 1 I,I Ee a ,Nen mw m. Gass As Mem ae v: i It\°t �� I I I • i 11 ,�\ �\I .I - ! (y M ..�. � _ I I I � I •aaa ua I • N lLQ5! A..ST EET j i I usolx r l 4 —t I1 B - I r {I II I, I I' 71 �-� WN%— /1,W I!I E i 1�L? ! I �s I I IMNiasaa¢nw c ae¢nw ' ! , anrar a.m.u esv Rwart error.u um I nro m.:on M"m�mr r li I'I 6 IRJ .J r I y� �j a N.cr nu nw . Nec ! i`' I ,{ s i ' i I • �+_ I 1i {�I I I '.. �ar+aa nN s"m7 essra�urt s rrmcoNN• laus¢s i n ! •I'rr'1 rn / . I 1, m ®i: n� ! VEi g l i ° i r wo•eoom Meao-wi ... ,' w• .._ _. III .I i m tlm Nlusel c.r. sui Klun ur. '.." ••� �� I i'I.1 I I :. I ,.'," a ,�__..—.._I�:��� ¢�� 1'.I� .i il'. Grl N¢NNn c.r. ",L 1 I neap ew.Nar � a nncrwuw ! snfl, lI l Daest I� 1 es. s�asraess e1,1111fal,si wwx t , �`C nr: Navas¢or roNr III � I� \ •.,� ,_ I �'I r \ err. severs wD rceD l I "tf� ,. zl a....., E t 'I I, GA.. Novas error wN II 11 I •D, I FIRE f I I I STATION ' iIL l 5D. IeNWIOMIm N " ;,i I .s 5E esra. .5a ams rusvarmr sner I 0o ai l II� I i r IOf nMam" RESERVOIR � � I i �'• ssaa¢s wecmr a nay I II � Novas errors arwr¢s n III I +I 11 e ': I ..I I: r 1RAGi M7.1l6Ef) 5Wwsm msmi°rNe�se°soroiDp1 L\ I I III ♦ slum rroaso oa sve \ I ' r I I i i I I Novas erors am kd{ II ,:' ._. "e¢rs» PREPARED FOR: •� fiicr�a �ALDE. a REVISED I I wcxun nAF WN N,arI ss0cIATM SITE PLAN TRACT NO. 15890 Q01101I�WALL DETAL _ @r mINTa76'eaa 89"IL CUMFXd 1 V RETAM1.10 WALL WU 6'WROUGHT IRON FENCE ATOP 2'RETAINING UV b'SCREEN WALL 2'BLOCK WALL W/6' TREE&rALM PALErM WROUGHT IRON ATOP II ARCHONTOITION 1X GTRNNGHAFIIANA BOTTLE PATH BRAOH IA SPEC POPUIELS BOTTLE TIME !'1 CHORIBI4 JH CAMPW FLOSS BILK TREE yll�'V:5 CAS61A L IIfI PMYLL RA GOLD E TREE ECRI�OBOfRTA DEFLEXA BRCNZE LOOTDALLION TREE ERYTHRNACORALLOIDES CORN.TREE ZB MCUSTIICROP AYLLd RUSTY LEER FG FICUS NTIDA NDIAN LAUREL Fr.ZQnb KOELRE TU ERIA 911PPINNOATA CHIIES�AMIE TREE 7 JACAMANDA -- PERIMETER BLOCK WALL LAGERBTROEMIA MICA CRAPE FT RiLE A ORJOUEERv1A CAJEPR TREE IFINUS ELO4RIGA MONDIELL P! 1 POpOCRGRAGLIOR FERN PINE 9 WA CdROLNI ' T i TIGHT' CAR CHERRY 04 72 RAPWIOLER9 NPICA"AJE9TIC BEAUTY' AS71CMALTYTT R DIAN M4WRHORE SCAINUSTER LU9 BRAZI IAN PEPPER 6ELITZIA NICOLAI GIANT BIRD OF PARADISE ACCENT PALM TR SYAGQLB RY?IANZOFFIAN M BEEN PALM / TIPUANA TIPU TIPU / TRJSTAN14 CON'ERTA BRISBA E BOX / I STREET 17�E N WASRINGTOA ROBUSTA MEXICAN FAN PALM ALL OTHER TREES LISTED ABOVE THAT ARE NOT REFEREED TO A SYMBOL MAY BE USED AS IRDERSTORT AND/OR ACCENT PLANTING FOR THIS PROJECT, 2'BLOCK WALL W/6' WROUGHT IRON ATOP I 77Q I (VU'J F3 / I / I W / ,. 7 SHRUB PALETTE I 72.7 B d� I 'L _ _ [ 72A AGAPANTWUS AFRICANUS LILY OF THE NILE BOA:ANVILLEA SPP. BOUGANNLLEA BOXWOOD THER 7J.5 SCI�EN TREE/CONF CUPLEA WSSoPIFOLId ER CTATHEA COOPERI AUSTR LIAN TREE FERN PERIMETER BLOCK WALL B TX I LILT HI6GI9 SNENSIB U4RF' HIBISCUS !< �.. �..........A.._.... ..... _ ... _._._.__.L ._ LAVENDW.A DENTATA LAVEPDER . ... --. — _.. EXIST—PERIMETER BLODC WALL LIGIISTRP'I LPAC-I I GL09DY PRIVET r My—'I MESTIC 11 MT'OPOLY NEPWRO D IS CO DI'CO'iPACT4' SWORDWEAVE E BAT�00 NEF'FROLEPI9 GOFDIFCLI4 WK1F�FEIB'I PHOENIX ROEBELNII PIGMY DATE PALM _—WROUGHT IRON FENCE b'HIGH SPLIT FADE BLCCK WALL P4OWK11 SPP.'DWARF' NEW ZEALANJ FLAX PHOTNIA FRASEFU PHOTNIA PITT06POFSJM TOBIRA TOBIRA RHAPHIOLEPIS NDICA BALLERINA' NDIA WAWTHORI RHdF'HIOLEPIS I DICA'CLARA' I DIA HAWTHORN RHAPHIOLEP15 NDICA'SPRNGTNV' NDIA HAWTHORN LOT LN LOr IM ROMARINUS OFFIGNALIS ROSEMARY 9TRELI7ZIA M094AE BIRD OF I-AMAD19E TRACHELOSPER MIJM JASMNOIDES 67AR JASMINE VIOUFRU'1 TWS VIBURNUM VNCA MAJOR PERRURKLE XYL09MA CONGEISTUY XYLOSMIA r .. .:, 1 I ..:: ° r... _ — � -: ROUOATICN NDi6 ELEVATION OF 2'BLOCK WALL W/6' ELEVATION OF 6'NIGH SPLIT SECTION 'RETAINING WROUGHT IRON FENCE FACE BLOCK WALL W/6'SCREEN WALL N.TS. F.yr CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN HUNTINGTON BEACH - TENTATIVE TRACT 15690 •�"y"1 PLC LAND COMPANY •19 CORPORATE PLAZA • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 6(949) 721-9777 ATTACHMENT 7 PIC September 14, 2001 Mr. Wayne Carvalho, Associate Planner Planning Department 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Subject: Tentative Tract Map No. 15690 - REVISED Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14 - REVISED Dear Wayne: Enclosed please find twelve sets of full-size prints and one set of reductions of revised plans for the above applications. The plans have been revised as follows: 1. The tentative tract map has been revised from ten lots to eight lots, resulting in a density of 3.0-units per gross acre. 2. The minimum lot size has been increased from 7,217 square feet to 8;372 square feet and the average lot size has increased from 9,893 to 12,772 square feet. 3. To maintain the "natural" topography of the west end of the site adjacent to the proposed regional park, the cul-de-sac has been shortened and the residential lots have been reoriented and lengthened. Where the previous site plan proposed a 2:1 slope immediately adjacent to the regional park, the revised rear yards of Lots 3-6 now include a flatter, wider variable width slope that joins the existing grades at approximately the 60-foot contour, some 50 feet into the site. y 4. The site has been redesigned so that the cul-de-sac and the majority of lot drainage is directed to Edwards Street, thereby eliminating a storm drain previously designed to join existing storm drains within the adjacent reservoir site. A small amount of slope drainage will still flow to the southwest and through the reservoir drain system. 5. The cul-de-sac and sewer line within the site will be public instead of private to i eliminate the need for a homeowner's association. 6. Landscape Lots and A and B will be planted consistent with existing parkway , landscaping along Edwards Street and dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach. 7. Six-foot high masonry walls will be constructed on the east side of Lots 1 and 8 facing Edwards Street, and atop a maximum two-foot high retaining wall at the rear of Lot 1. A view fence consisting of tubular steel on top of a two-foot high masonry base is proposed along the rear yards of Lots 2-6 abutting the regional park site, including pilasters at each property line and angle point. . I i 19 Corporate Plaza Drive i 949.721.9777 Telephone PLC E and [Dompany Newport Beach, California 92660 949.729.1214 Facsimile I 8. A conceptual landscape and wall and fence plan has been prepared to show planting within landscape lots A and B, required street trees on each residential lot; and locations and details for perimeter walls and fences. A conditional use permit is required for approval of development on the site, which has greater than a three foot change in elevation, and for approval of conceptual floor plans, elevations and a site plan for construction of eight two-story, three and four bedroom homes ranging from 4,100 to 4,300 square feet. In addition to 25 enclosed parking spaces in garages. 24 ofstreet (driveway) and six onstreet parking spaces are provided for the eight homes. v If the site is to be incorporated into the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan (as recommended by staff), a variance for a reduced rear yard setback of 15.5 feet (vs. 20 feet) is required for the home on Lot 7. The requested setback exceeds the standard citywide RL zone requirement of ten feet, and is mitigated by the lot's 21-foot wide side yard dimension, which provides over 1,200 square feet of usable yard area. The variance condition could be eliminated if the retaining wall along the north side of the tract were allowed to exceed 2 feet (which could be approved as part of the conditional use permit), however, this option was not supported by staff. The revised plans have been prepared in response to the City's proposed settlement of the dispute regarding the development of this property. Submittal of these plans in no way waives PLC's rights under any pending arbitration or litigation. Very truly yours, William D. Holman." & Government Relations Enclosures cc: Howard Zelefsky Mike Joyce ATTACHMENT 8 -ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 98-18 1. PROJECT TITLE: HOLLY SEACLIFF ANNEXATION AND 10 LOT SUBDIVISION Concurrent Entitlements: Tentati,%a Tract Map No. 15690/Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2/ Variance No. 99-4/Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14 2. LEAD AGENCY: City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Contact: Joseph Thompson, Planning Aide Phone: (714) 536-5561 3. PROJECT LOCATION: West side of Edwards Street, approximately 15 feet south of Ellis Avenue 4. PROJECT PROPONENT: PI.0 Land Company 23 Corporate Plaza Suite 250 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Contact Person: Bill Holman Phone: (949) 721-9777 5. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: RL-4-sp (Estate Residential—max. 4 units per net acre) 6. ZONIi\NG: The applicant is requesting a designation of: RL (Low Density Residential) 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Annexation of 2.71 acres of land presently located in the jurisdiction of the County of Orange into the City of Huntington Beach. The Zoning Map Amendment is required to establish City zoning on the property, a zoning designation of RL (Residential Low Density) is requested. The project includes a Tentative Tract Map to subdi,%ide the 2.71 acres into ten(10) single family lots, however, no construction of homes is proposed at this time. Variance No. 99-4 is requested to allow reduced lot widths on four(4) of the ten(10) single family lots (34-feet to 40-feet wide in lieu of the required minimum 45-feet w ide). Environmental Checklist 1 ofs6 i 8 EA 98-18 8. OTHER PREVIOUS RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: EIR 89-1 (Holly Seacliff Environmental Impact Report) 9. OTHER AGENCIES WHOSE APPROVAL IS REQUIRED (AND PERMITS NEEDED): None ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a"Potentially Significant Impact"or is"Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated,"as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Land Use/Planning ❑ Transportation/Traffic ❑ Public Services ❑ Population/Housing ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Utilities/Service Systems ❑ Geology/Soils ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Hydrology/Water Quality ❑ Hazards and Hazardous Materials Cultural Resources ❑ Air Quality ❑ Noise ❑ Recreation ❑ Agriculture Resources ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE 0 DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment,and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a potentially significant effect(s)on the environment, but at least one effect(1)has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and(2)has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be Eladdressed. Environmental Checklist 2 of K 13 EA 98-18 I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects(a)have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and(b)have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further ❑ is equire (7atu Date 0seph Thompson Planning Aide Printed Name Title EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EMPACTS: 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except"No Impact"answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A"No Impact"answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to the project. A"No Impact"answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards. 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved. Answers should address off-site as well as on- site,cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3. "Potentially Significant Impact"is appropriate, if an effect is significant or potentially significant, or if the lead agency lacks information to make a finding of insignificance. If there are one or more"Potentially Significant Impact"entries when the determination is made,preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is warranted. 4. Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigated"applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from"Potentially Significant Impact"to a"Less than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures,and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level(mitigation measures from Section XVIII,"Earlier Analyses,"may be cross-referenced).._ 5. Earlier analyses may be used where,pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process,an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analyses are discussed in Section XVIII at the end of the checklist. 6. References to information sources for potential impacts(e.g.,general plans,zoning ordinances)have been incorporated into the checklist. A source list has been provided in Section XVIII. Other sources used or individuals contacted have been cited in the respective discussions. 7. The following checklist has been formatted after Appendix G of Chapter 3,Title 14,California Code of Regulations,but has been augmented to reflect the City of Huntington Beach's requirements. (Note: Standard Conditions of Approval-The City imposes standard conditions of approval on projects which are considered to be components of or modifications to the project, some of these standard conditions also result in reducing or minimizing environmental impacts to a level of insignificance. However,because they are considered part of the project,they have not been identified as mitigation measures. For the readers' information, a list of applicable standard conditions identified in the discussions has been provided as Attachment No.3. Environmental Checklist 3 of 2,(B EA 98-18 SAMPLE QUESTION: Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES(and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: Landslides? (Sources: I, 6) Discussion: The attached source list explains that I is the Huntington Beach General Plan and 6 is a topographical map of the area which show that the area is located in a flat area. (Note: This response probably would not require further explanation). I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Conflict with any applicable land use plan,policy,or 13 9 regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including,but not limited to the general plan,specific plan, local coastal program,or zoning ordinance)adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? (Sources: 1, 5,6, 10, 14, 18) b) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or El El 0 natural community conservation plan?(Sources: 10, 14, 19) c) PhysicalIy divide an established community? (Sources: I,5, Z 18) Discussion: The project site is vacant and is surrounded by the proposed Harriett M.Wieder Regional Park to the north and west,a planned City fire station and partially above ground water reservoir to the south,and existing single family residences across Edwards Street to the east. The residential neighborhood to the east of the subject property is located within the Ellis Goldenwest Specific Plan and is zoned Estate Residential,allowing for a maximum of three dwelling units per acre. The subject property is currently located within County of Orange jurisdiction and is located directly outside the Huntington Beach city boundary but within the City's sphere of influence and the Holly Seacliff General Plan Amendment area. In January of 1990,the subject property was designated for Estate Residential development via the Holly Seacliff General Plan Amendment. Annexation of the subject property will occur prior to any type of development. An application for annexation has been submitted to LAFCO. The proposed project allows for a maximum density of four dwelling units per net acre and is designed to be compatible with other single-family tracts in the area in terms of lot size and floor area. All lots will comply with the minimum 6,000 square foot requirement for RL lots as called for in the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. However,in an effort to be consistent with other estate residential lots existing in the area,the City recommends minimum 7,000 square foot lots for this development with the exception of one(1)lot,and the applicant has designed the subdivision accordingly. The applicant is requesting a variance from minimum lot widths for Lot 4(38 feet wide),Lot 5(37 feet wide),Lot 6(30 feet wide),and Lot 7(39 feet wide) in lieu of the 45 feet minimum lot width as required in the zoning code. Environmental Checklist 4 of" /8 EA 9848 f r.,tentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact The proposed Harriett M.Wieder Regional Park is adjacent to the site. A sloped landscaped area at the rear of each lot abutting the park will provide buffering and no direct access is proposed between the site and the park. The project will not conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan and will not disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an existing neighborhood. No significant adverse land-use impacts resulting from the development are anticipated. H. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area,either directly El 0 11 (e.g.,by proposing new homes and businesses)or indirectly (e.g.,through extensions of roads or other infrastructure)? (Sources: 1,3,5, 14, 18) b) DispIace substantial numbers of existing housing,necessitating El 9 the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Sources: 3,5) c) Displace substantial numbers of people,necessitating the El El 11 construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Sources: 3, 5) Discussion:The project will subdivide the existing 2.71 acres into ten single-family lots. Approximately 37 occupants are anticipated if a single-family residence is built on each of the lots. The population increase resulting from this future development is consistent with the growth projections in the City of Huntington Beach General Plan and regional projections and represents less than 0.1 percent of the city's current population. The subject site is currently vacant and there will be no displacement of housing or people as part of this project. No significant adverse population impacts resulting from the development are anticipated. III.GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects,including the risk of loss,injury,or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault,as delineated on the El most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault?(Sources: 1,5,7, 11) ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?(Sources:5,7, 11) iii) Seismic-related ground failure,including liquefaction? (Sources: 5,7, 11) iv) Landslides? (Sources:5,7, 11) El 11 El 0 Environmental Checklist 5 of24t$ EA 98-13 ( r�,,tentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact b) Result in substantial soil erosion,loss of topsoil,or changes in El El Z topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading,or fill? (Sources:3,5,7, 11) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable,or that El El 0 would become unstable as a result of the project,and potentially result in on or off-site landslide,lateral spreading, subsidence,liquefaction or collapse? (Sources: 1,5,7, 11) d) Be located on expansive soil,as defined in Table 18-1-B of the El 9 Uniform Building Code(1994),creating substantial risks to life or property? (Sources: 1,5,7, 11) Discussion: The existing site slopes downward beginning at the middle of the site and gradually loses approximately 14 feet in elevation at the west property line and 11 feet in elevation at the north property line,both adjacent to the proposed Harriett M. Weider Regional Park. The southeastern portion of the site is generally flat and level with Edwards Street. The project proposes that 100 percent of the site be graded. The applicant has provided two grading alternatives. Alternative A(Attachment No.2a),the applicant's original submittal,requires 20,000 cubic yards of fill with no cutting of soil. The majority of fill will occur on the north and west sides of the site to provide level building sites. This alternative results in pads that are approximately three feet above top of curb. Fill depths range from one foot at the southeastern corner of the site(Lot 10)to 17.9 feet at the western edge of the site(Lot 5). After grading,the site will have a two to one(2:1)slope along the north and west portions of the site. This slope will have a maximum width of 24 feet along the north property line and 39 feet along the west property line with a maximum height differential of 17 feet at the western edge. After review of Alternative A,the Huntington Beach Department of Public Works requested the applicant provide another grading alternative to accommodate a different drainage solution. Alternative B(Attachment No.2b)requires less fill, approximately 13,300 cubic yards of soil,with 800 cubic yards of cut. This design results in a slightly lower profile,with the proposed street and pads decreasing in height in a westerly direction. Adjacent to Edwards Street,pad-heights are approximately two feet above top of curb but decrease by two feet at the west edge(Lots 5 and 6). Similarly,the street elevation slopes down to the west,decreasing by approximately 1.5 feet. The maximum fill depth decreases to 13 feet at the western edge of the site(Lot 5). The resulting project would also have a two to one(2:1)slope along the north and west portions of the site,though narrower than that of Alternative A,with a maximum height differential of 13.5 feet. The import of soil for either alternative will be via an approved truck-hauling route. Displacement,compaction,and over- covering of soil associated with the construction of the infrastructure improvements are considered negligible. Site preparation may result in short term wind and water erosion impacts;however,the impacts from proposed grading on the project site are not considered significant and will be further reduced by standard conditions of approval requirements. The project will be subject to standard conditions of approval requiring implementation of dust control measures and submittal of an erosion control plan(see Condition No. 12 on Attachment No.3). The project site is not located within the Alquist-Priolo Special Hazards Zone or any other known geologic hazard areas. However, in the event of an earthquake in the Huntington Beach area,the site may be subject to ground shaking. Structures built in California are required to comply with standards set forth in the Uniform Building Code to minimize the structural risks from ground shaking. Per the 1992 Technical Background Report General Plan Update,the project site is located in an area of moderate to high clay content which can be indicative of expansive soils. However,this is common in the City and impacts can be addressed through compliance with applicable soils,grading and structural foundation requirements, codes and ordinances,such that any potential geologic impacts will be reduced to a level of insignificance. (See Standard Condition No.I on Attachment No.3 requiring compliance with all local and State codes). Environmental Checklist 6 of2�0, I$ EA 98-18 r utentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact IV.HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge 0 El 0 requirements? (Sources: 3,4, 14) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere El El El 0 substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level(e.g.,the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted? (Sources:7, 14) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or 11 El 19 11 area,including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river,in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on or off-site? (Sources: 1,2,3, 14, 19) d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or 0 area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river,or substantially increase the rate or amount or surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on or off- site? (Sources: 1,2,3, 14, 19) e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the El El 19 El capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? _ (Sources: 5, 12, 14, 19) f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? (Sources: 14, El El 0 19) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped El on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or FIood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? (Sources: 1,5, 12) h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which El El 0 would impede or redirect flood flows? (Sources: 1,5, 12) i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,injury or death involving flooding,including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? (Sources: 1,5, 12) j) Inundation by seiche,tsunami,or mudflow? (Sources: 5, 14) Environmental Checklist 7 of210 I8 EA 98-18 f otentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact Discussion:Buildout of the property under the proposed conceptual plan will increase the amount of impervious surfaces (concrete,asphalt,etc.). New impervious surfaces as well as construction related activities that require grading would increase the amount of storm water runoff. The project is consistent with the approved area-wide drainage concept as stated in the flood control/hydrology/hydraulic study incorporated as part of the adopted Holly Seacliff Specific Plan EIR Technical Appendix. The existing site drains to the proposed Harriet M. Wieder Regional Park site. Under Alternative A,only the rear yards of lots 1 through 6 will continue to drain onto the proposed Park site with the remainder of the site graded so that water runoff will sheet flow onto Edwards Street. With Alternative B,runoff from the entire site would be directed through the City water reservior site adjacent to the south and empty to the proposed Park site via approved drainage structures for the reservoir project. The Department of Public Works requested this alternative because it reduces runoff to City streets,minimizes the amount of fill(as discussed in Section III)and by redirecting existing flow to the Park site through the City property,reduces the number of drainage impact areas to the proposed Park site. Both alternatives result in less than significant impact to drainage patterns on adjacent sites The project will be subject to standard conditions of approval requiring submittal of grading plans and hydrology and hydraulic studies for review and approval by the Public Works Department to determine that the runoff generated by the proposed project will not adversely impact existing drainage systems and adjacent properties.(see Standard Condition No.7 on Attachment No.3). Curb and gutter will be constructed to tie into the City's existing storm drain system in Edwards Street. The project site is located within Flood Insurance Rate Map(FIRM)Zone X,which is not subject to Federal Flood Development requirements. The project will be subject to standard conditions of approval requiring Public Works Department review and approval of grading plans,soils reports,and hydrology studies prior to any activity on the site(see Standard Condition Nos.2,4,and 6 on Attachment No.3). The project will require the installation of new on-site water lines. Because the proposed ten unit project complies with the Estate Residential land use designation in the General Plan,the estimated water demand of approximately 3740 gallons per day for the proposed project can be accommodated by the City's water service capacity and does not represent a significant demand. The site does not drain directly into any natural body of water. No significant adverse impacts to the existing water supply are anticipated. V. AIR QUALITY. Where available,the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or ❑ ❑ ❑ projected air quality violation? (Sources: 13, 14) b) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ concentrations? (Sources: 13, 14) c) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of ❑ ❑ ❑ a people? (Sources: 3) d) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? (Sources: 3,5, 13) ❑ ❑ ❑ Q e) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment Environmental Checklist 8 of,26 EA 9848 rutentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality El El 9 standard(including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? (Sources:3, 13) Discussion: Short-term:The construction of the ten unit residential project will result in short term increases in dust and construction equipment emissions. Emissions are expected from gasoline and diesel powered grading and paving equipment and fugitive dust generation associated with earth moving activities. Due to the size and scope of the grading and construction (approximately eight months),the dust and construction emissions are not anticipated to be significant(based on AQMD thresholds)and can be further reduced with implementation of standard conditions of approval(see Condition No. 12 on Attachment No.3). No significant adverse impacts are anticipated. Lone-term:The annexation of the 2.71 acres will have no long term air quality impacts. However,if development occurs on each of the ten single-family lots,air quality will be impacted. Using data from the 1993 CEQA Air Quality Handbook produced by the South Coast Air Quality Management District(AQMD),the estimated 120 vehicle trips generated from the possible development of ten single—family homes is not expected to produce emissions that will significantly impact air quality. Because the scale of the project is 95 percent below the threshold criteria established by the AQMD for potentially significant impacts, its contribution is minor in nature. No significant air quality impacts to the area are anticipated. VI.TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to ❑ El ❑X the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system(e.g., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips,the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections? (Sources: 1,3,5, 14, 15, 19) b) Exceed,either individually or cumulatively,a level of service El ❑X 0 standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? (Sources: 1,3, 5, 14, 15, 19) c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns,including either an El ❑ 11 ❑X increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? (Sources: 5) d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature(e.g., El ❑ El 1 sharp curves or dangerous intersections)or incompatible uses? (Sources: 1,2, 14) e) Result in inadequate emergency access? (Sources: 1,2,5, 14) F1 El El Z f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? (Sources:3,6) g) Conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative ❑ 11 El 0 transportation(e.g.,bus turnouts,bicycle racks)? (Sources: 1, 3, 14) Environmental Checklist 9 ofx/8 EA 984 rutentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact Discussion: If the ten single-family homes are built as a result of the annexation of the 2.71 acres,the development is projected to result in approximately 120 average vehicle trips per day at completion. Access to the project will be via Edwards Street(see Attachment No. 1). The single street within the proposed tract is designed to be public,complying with public street standards. Existing roadway segments in the area are currently operating at a level of service(LOS)of D or better(Edwards Street from Garfield Avenue to Talbert Avenue-LOS A;Ellis Avenue from Edwards Street to Golden West Street—LOS A). The soon to be signalized intersection at Edwards Street and Ellis Avenue is also anticipated to have a LOS A during PM peak hours. Traffic generation associated with the project constitutes less than one percent of the existing traffic levels in the vicinity and is projected to have a negligible impact to levels of service in the area. Parking for the subdivision will be provided independently on each lot and the public street. With implementation of standard conditions of approval,including conformance of the proposed public street to City standards,review and approval of street improvement plans,and payment of traffic impact fees,no significant traffic impacts are anticipated. Construction traffic during the project's development may result in short-term interruptions to traffic circulation,including pedestrian and bicycle flow in the area. Based on the scope of the project construction,the traffic is not considered to be significant. However,any impact may be further reduced through implementation of standard conditions of approval requiring Department of Public Works approval of a construction vehicle control plan(See Standard Condition No. 5 on Attachment No.3). VH. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect,either directly or through El habitat modifications,on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive,or special status species in local or regional plans, policies,or regulations,or by the California Department of - Fish and Game or U.S,Fish and Wildlife Service? (Sources: 5, 14, 19) b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or 11 El 9 other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans,policies,regulations,or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service?, (Sources: 5, 14, 19) c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including,but not limited to,marsh,vernal pool,coastal,etc.) through direct removal, filling,hydrological interruption,or other means? (Sources: 5, 14, 19) d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native El El resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? (Sources: 5, 14, 19) Environmental Checklist 10 of,2e/8 EA 98-18 r otentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources,such as a tree preservation policy or ❑ ❑ ❑ ordinance? (Sources:5, 14, 19) f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan,Natural Community Conservation Plan,or ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑X other approved local,regional,or state habitat conservation plan? (Sources: 5, 14, 19) Discussion: The proposed project site does not support any unique or endangered plant or animal species. The ten proposed lots will be subject to standard conditions of approval requiring submittal and approval of a landscape plan by the Departments of Public Works and Planning. There are no mature trees existing on the site. The project will be required to comply with the City standard for landscaping including the provision for 40%of the front yard setback to be landscaped and a minimum of one tree in the front yard of each lot. No impact to plant life is anticipated. The subject site is outside of current city limits and within the eastern border of the Bolsa Chica Wetland Project. The planned Harriett M.Wieder Regional Park separates the subject site from the low lands and wetland areas by approximately 700 feet. The project will not result in any loss to endangered or sensitive animal or bird species. In addition,no impact to the wetland habitat or wildlife located on the lowlands or the planned Harriett M. Wieder Regional Park is anticipated. VIH. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource ❑ ❑ ❑ Z that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (Sources: 5,7, 11, 14) b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral ❑ ❑ ❑ 19 resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan,or other land use plan? (Sources: 5,7, 11, 14) Discussion: Construction of the ten-unit subdivision will not result in a loss of availablity of known or locally-important mineral resources. The subject property is located on tidal flat alluvium,which consists of mostly sand,gravel,and silt. The new residences are not anticipated to significantly deplete any non-renewable resource. No significant impacts to minerals resources are anticipated. IX.HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment ❑ ❑ ❑ through the routine transport,use,or disposal of hazardous materials? (Sources: 1,2,3,5, 16) b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment El 11 ❑ a through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? (Sources: 3, 10, 14) Environmental Checklist 11 ofo Ig EA 98-18 r utentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely ❑ ❑ ❑ hazardous material,substances,or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? (Sources:3,5, 16) d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous ❑ ❑ ❑ materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and,as a result,would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? (Sources: 1,5, 16) e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or,where such a plan has not been adopted,within two miles of a public ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑X airport or pubic use airport,would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (Sources: 1,5) f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 in the project area? (Sources: 1,5) g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑X plan? (Sources:5, 14) h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,injury, or death involving wildland fires,including where wildlands ❑ ❑ ❑ Q are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? (Sources:5, 10, 14) Discussion: The proposed subdivision will not involve the use of any hazardous materials and will not result in any impediments to emergency response or evacuation plans. Buildout of the property under the proposed conceptual plan will increase the amount of impervious surfaces and,thereby,reduce the risk of fire hazard as it relates to brush,grass and trees. The project site is located adjacent to the planned Edwards Street Fire Station and,therefore,within the Fire Department's five minute response time. With implementation of standard conditions of approval,no significant impacts resulting from hazardous materials are anticipated. X. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess ❑ ❑ o ❑ of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance,or applicable standards of other agencies? (Sources:3,4,5, 14) b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne ❑ ❑ Q Cl vibration or groundborne noise levels? (Sources:3,4,5, 14) c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ (Sources:3,4,5, 14) Environmental Checklist 12 of.208 EA 98-18 r otentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ project? (Sources:3,4,5, 14) e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or,where such a plan has not been adopted,within two miles of a public ❑ ❑ ❑ Q airport or public use airport,would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (Sources: 1, 5) f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 excessive noise levels? (Sources: 1,5) Discussion: The project will generate short-term noise impacts during construction with the use of heavy construction equipment. All construction will be required to comply with Chapter 8.40 Noise of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code, and through the implementation and compliance of standard conditions of approval,no significant noise impacts during construction are anticipated. Long-term noise impacts may occur as a result of the increase in vehicular trips and associated vehicular noise generated by the new tract. The project will be required to comply with State requirements pertaining to noise attenuation such that interior noise levels do not exceed 45dB in any habitable room. This may be achieved by use of double-paned windows,air conditioning systems,or other methods or a combination thereof. No significant long-term noise impacts resulting from the new tract are anticipated. X1.PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities,need for new or physically altered governmental facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts,in order to maintain acceptable service ratios,response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? (Sources:Huntington Beach Fire Department, ❑ ❑ ❑ 19) b) Police Protection? (Sources:Huntington Beach Police ❑ FRIE ❑ Department, 19) c) Schools? (Sources: 5,6, 14, 19) ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ d) Parks? (Sources:5,6, 14, 19) ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ e) Other public facilities or governmental services? (Sources:5, ❑ ❑ R ❑ 14, 17, 18, 19) Environmental Checklist 13 of 29(8 EA 98-1 r utentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact Discussion: The proposed annexation has initially been reviewed by various City Departments,including Public Works,Fire, Police and Planning,for compliance with all applicable City codes. With implementation of standard conditions of approval, and compliance with City specifications,no significant adverse impacts to public services are anticipated. The level of development is consistent with that allowed by the Holly Seacliff General Plan Amendment and would not create unexpected impacts to public services. The site is located in the Huntington Beach Union High School District. According to student generation rates for local school districts and assuming ten new residences will be built on the annexed site,the project will generate approximately four students. In itself,the project will not require construction of school facilities but on a cumulative basis,will contribute to overcrowding and the need for additional facilities. If the annexed 2.71 acres is developed,the developer will be required to pay State-mandated school impact fees to defray capital costs for these facilities. XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? (Sources: 5, 14, 19) b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (Sources: 5, 14, 18, 19) c) Require or result in the construction of new storm waterEl 0 19 El drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (Sources:5, 14, 18, 19). d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project El from existing entitlements and resources,or are new or expanded entitlements needed? (Sources: 5, 14, 19) e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate El capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? (Sources: 5, 14, 19) f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to 11 El accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? (Sources:3, 14, 19) g) Comply with federal,state,and local statutes and regulationsEl El z related to solid waste? (Sources: 14) Discussion: _If single family residences are built on the annexed 2.71 acres,the project site will require incremental extensions of public services and utilities which will be provided by the respective governmental agencies and utility companies. All utility connections to each of the new residential lots will be in accordance with all applicable Uniform Codes,City ordinances,Public Works standards,and Water Division criteria. Solid waste will be collected by Rainbow Disposal Company,which has a contract for disposal services with the City. With the implementation of standard conditions of approval,no adverse impacts to the City's utilities or services are anticipated. I Environmental Checklist 14 ofA EA 98-18' r otentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? (Sources: El ElEl1,2,5, 19) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including,but not ❑ ❑ ❑ limited to,trees,rock outcroppings,and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? (Sources: 1,2,8) c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of ❑ El 9 ❑ the site and its surroundings? (Sources: 1,2, 10, 19) d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? (Sources: ❑ ❑ ❑X ❑ 1,2, 14) Discussion: The proposed two story homes are consistent with the proposed RL zoning and will be compatible with the surrounding residential development. The tract is designed to provide an average 25 foot wide perimeter landscape slope area along the western edge of the site and a 15 foot wide landscape buffer along the northern edge of the site;both adjacent to the planned Harriett M.Weider Regional Park. In addition,a 15-foot wide landscape easement is proposed along Edwards Street to soften the street scene. The private lots will be setback behind this easement,which will minimize visual impacts from Edwards Street. Individual Iots will also be landscaped pursuant to City standards. Areas adjacent to the project site that are developed with residential uses have development standards similar to those that would apply to the subject property. The site is not located along any scenic highway. The project is located on the west side of Edwards Street at approximately the same grade elevation as the existing homes to the east and south,but on a bluff above additional properties that are to the west and northwest. While there are residential properties located in the lower lying areas to the northwest,these homes are over a half-mile away and only have distant views of this site,being separated by the Bolsa Chica lowlands. The two-story homes to the east currently have a distant view of the ocean. The construction of this project would affect that view for some of those property owners on the east side of Edwards Street. This scenic vista impact was previously analyzed in the Holly Seacliff EIR 89-1 and identified as an unavoidable impact associated with construction on vacant lots. The project will introduce new light sources on the project site including street lighting and residential lighting. Although the project will result in an increase in light in the area,the incremental increase in ambient lighting in the area is considered negligible and is consistent with the residential nature of the area. The project will be subject to standard conditions of approval,which require that lighting be directed to prevent spillage onto adjacent properties. No adverse aesthetic impacts are anticipated. XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a ❑ ❑ ❑ 19 historical resource as defined in 515064.5? (Sources: 1,8,9 14, 19) b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ archaeological resource pursuant to 515064.5? (Sources:7,9, 14, 19) Environmental Checklist 15 of.Xle EA 98-18 r itentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ❑ ❑ 9 ❑ resource or site unique geologic feature? (Sources:9, 19) d) Disturb any human remains,including those interred outside of ❑ ❑ ❑ formal cemeteries? (Sources: 7,9, 14, 19) Discussion: The project site is not located within any of the City's historic districts. However,a portion of the site is located within an archaeological site identified as ORA-82. Based on the location of ORA-82 and research conducted by Jeanne Munoz(1975),which is referenced in the Revised Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Bolsa Chica Project-Local Coastal Program,"the site[ORA-82] consists of shells,anthrosols,lithic,and other abundant artifacts." However,ORA-82 has been repeatedly plowed and roads and oil extractions have continually impacted the site. As part of the mitigation measures described in the Holly Seacliff EIR 89-1,monitoring of all grading activities is required by a certified archeologist. No adverse impacts to cultural or archeaological resources are anticipated. XV. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood, ❑ ❑ 9 ❑ community and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? (Sources:3,5, 19) b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? (Sources: 5, 14) c) Affect existing recreational opportunities?(Sources:3,5) Discussion: The project will not result in the loss of existing recreational facilities. The project will be subject to payment of park and recreation fees to contribute toward the project's share of park facilities in the city,which will offset the project's cumulative recreational impacts. With implementation of the standard conditions of approval,no impacts to recreational opportunities are anticipated. XVI.AGRICULTURE RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects,lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model(1997) prepared by the California Dept.of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland,Unique Farmland,or Farmland of ❑ ❑ ❑ Statewide Importance(Farmland),as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency,to non- agricultural use? (Sources:5,6, 19) b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use,or a ❑ ❑ ❑ 9 Environmental Checklist 16 of 2kr(8 EA 98-18 .„tentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact Williamson Act contract? (Sources:6) c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which,due to their location or nature,could result in conversion of ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑X Farmland,to non-agricultural use? (Sources:5,6, 19) Discussion: The project is not located in an area designated as farmland and does not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use. XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of ❑ ❑ ❑ a the environment,substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? (Sources: 1,2,3,5,6, 10, 14, 19) Discussion: The project is not located in the areas of any wildlife or biological resource areas and will therefore not substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,or reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal. No significant adverse impacts are anticipated. b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited,but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑X when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, _ the effects of other current projects,and the effects of probable future projects.) (Sources:5,6, 17, 18, 19) Discussion: The project site is analyzed in the Holly Seacliff General Plan Amendment EIR:General Plan Policies. The potential impacts resulting from the proposed ten unit tract are not considered to be cumulatively considerable or significant as discussed under items I-XV above. c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,either directly or ❑ ❑ 0 indirectly? (Sources:4,5,6, 10, 12, 13, 14,,16, 19) Discussion: See discussion of items No.I-XV above. Environmental Checklist 17 of W16 EA 98-1$ XVIII. EARLIER ANALYSIS. Earlier analyses may be used where,pursuant to tiering,program EIR, or other CEQA process,one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063 (c)(3)(D). Earlier Documents Prepared and Utilized in this Analysis: Reference# Document Title Available for Review at: 1 Project Vicinity Map See Attachment No. 1 2 Reduced Tract Map:Alternative A See Attachment No.2a Alternative B See Attachment No.2b 3 Project Narrative See Attachment No.5 City of Huntington Beach 4 City of Huntington Beach Municipal Code City Clerk's Office,2"d Floor 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach City of Huntington Beach Planning Dept., 5 City of Huntington Beach General Plan Planning/Zoning Information Counter,3rd Floor 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach 6 City of Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance 7 Geotechnical Report,GeoSyntec Consultants(1998) " 8 City of Huntington Beach Historic District Map " 9 Archaeological Site Vicinity Map,Bolsa Chica Area " 10 Revised Draft Environmental Impact Report, " Bolsa Chica Project Local Coastal Program 11 Geotechnical Inputs Report—City of Huntington Beach " 12 FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map(January 3, 1997) " 13 CEQA Air Quality Handbook,South Coast Sair Quality " Management District(1993) 14 City of Huntington Beach CEQA Handbook " 15 Trip Generation,4d'Edition,Institute of Traffic Engineers " 16 Technical Background Report " General Plan Update(July, 1992) 17 Holly Seacliff Specific Plan(April, 1992) " 18 Holly Seacliff General Plan Amendment,General Plan Policies " (January, 1990) 19 Holly-Seacliff Environmental Impact Report " Environmental Checklist 18 of,26/8 EA 98-18 Attachment No. 3 Suggested Conditions of Approval 1. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, Building Division, and Fire Department as well as applicable local, State,and Federal Fire Codes,Ordinances, and standards. 2. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, a "Water Quality Management Plan' shall be prepared by a Civil or Environmental Engineer in accordance with NPDES requirements. 3. Prior to submittal of building permits, The project will comply will all provisions of Huntington Beach Municipal Code Title 17.04.085 and City Specification No. 429 for new construction within the methane gas overlay districts 4. A Grading Plan, prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted for review and approval. An erosion control plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works. 5. The applicant shall submit a construction vehicle control plan to Public Works for review and approval. 6. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer. This analysis shall include on-site sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading, chemical and fill properties,foundations,retaining walls,streets,and utilities. 7. A site drainage and storm water retention study shall be submitted and approved by the Department of Public Works. 8. A composite utility plan, depicting water system improvements and all other underground utilities (existing and proposed)to each proposed structure shall be submitted for review and approval. The plan shall include service .connections for water and sewer to each building, public and private fire hydrants, valves, and other appurtenances in accordance with the applicable Uniform Plumbing Code, City Ordinances, Public Works Standards and Water Division Design Criteria. 9. A lighting plan shall be submitted for review and approval. The lighting plan shall consider_ measures to prevent light spillage onto adjacent properties. - 10. A Traffic Impact Assessment (TIA) shall be submitted per the guidelines provided by the Public Works, Traffic Division. 12. During construction,the applicant shall: a. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems in all areas where vehicles travel to keep damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site; b. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day; c. Use low sulfur fuel(.05%)by weight for construction equipment; d. Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days(first stage smog alerts); e. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts. 13. All applicable Traffic Impact Fees shall be paid prior to final inspection. Attachment No. 3—Page I Attachment No. 4 i Summary of Mitigation Measures i Description of Impact Mitigation Measure Disturbance of Cultural Because of the proximity of this project to a known archaeological site, Resources Including monitoring of the grading activity during remedial site grading work shall be Human Remains conducted by an archaeologist. Attachment No. 4—Page 1 SOLTHERN CALIFOR.\IA ( `I f�I 131999 E DI SON An EDISON 1ATERN4TIONAL"ComFan � City of Huntington Beach July 7, 1999 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attention: Department of Planning Subject: Tract Map No. 15690 Our review of the subject subdivision map reveals that the proposed development may interfere with easement rights, and/or facilities held by Southern California Edison within the subdivision boundaries. Until such time as arrangements have been made with the developer to eliminate this interference,the development of the subdivision may unreasonably interfere with the complete and free exercise of Edison's rights. Five copies of the grading, drainage and street improvement plans are required to be submitted by the developer to determine the extent of interference. Included with the above referenced plans,the developer must state the proposed method to eliminate any interference. Plans should be forwarded to my attention at the following address: Southern California Edison Company 14803 Chestnut Street Westminster,CA 92683 Attention: Lisa Salinas If you have any questions or need additional information in connection with the-subject subdivision,please contact me at (714) 934-0838. Lisa Salinas Title and Real Estate Services Corporate Real Estate Department cc: T3 1 14803 Chestnut St. Westminster.CA 92683 800-817-3677 Fax 714-934-0837 � - 6 1999 STATE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATION AGENCY T GRAY DAVIS.Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 12 3347 MICHELSON DRIVE,SUITE 100 ..yg IRVINE.CA 92612-0661 'June 28, 1999 Joseph Thompson, Planning Aide City of Huntington Beach Department of Planning 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mr. Thompson: Subject: Tentative Tract No. 15690 Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on Tentative Tract No. 15690. The proposed project is to subdivide 2.71 acres of County land that is pending annexation into the City of Huntington Beach into ten (10) single family lots. The proposed project is located on the west side of Edwards Street, approximately 15 feet south of Ellis Avenue. Caltrans District 12 is a reviewing agency and has no comment . - Please continue to keep us informed of projects that may potentially impact our State Transportation Facilities. If you have any questions or comments, please call Lynne Gear at (949) 724-2241. Sincerely, Robert F. Joseph, Chie Advance Planning Branch cc: Tom Loftus, OPR Ron Helgeson, HDQTRS Planning sr O� { THOMAS E. MATHEWS County of Orange = - n>REcroR 300 N. FLOWER ST. LIFOR�~! Planning & Development Services DepartnWdt 2 0 1999 SANTA ANA,col NIA u; MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 4048 SANTA ANA, CA 92702-4049.., TELEPHONE: (714) 934-"43 FAX# 8342771 MAY 1 71999 NCL 99-34 Mr.Joseph Thompson City of Huntington Beach Department of Planning 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA SUBJECT: EA for the Holly Seacliff Annexation Dear Mr.Thompson: The above referenced item is an Environmental Assessment for the City of Huntington Beach. The proposed project consists of the annexation of 2.71 acres of land presently located in the jurisdiction of the County of Orange into the City of Huntington Beach. The Zoning Map Amendment is required to establish City zoning on the property; a zoning designation of RL (Residential Low Density)is requested. The project includes a Tentative Tract Map to subdivide the 2.71 acres into ten(10)single family lots,however,no construction of homes is proposed at this time. Variance No. 99-4 is requested to allow reduced lot widths on four(4)of the ten(10) single family lots(34-feet to 40-feet wide in lieu of the required minimum 45-feet wide). The project is located on the west side of Edwards Street, approximately 15 feet south of Ellis Avenue. - The County of Orange has reviewed the EA and offers the following comments: WATER QUALITY 1. The Initial Study on Page 8 suggests that issues related to potential pollutant content of stormwater runoff arising from the project are not significant because only project "landscape slopes"drain directly into the adjoining park and/or wetland reserve,while the rest of site drainage goes into"the City's existing storm drain system'. No analysis is provided to indicate that the City's system at this point does not itself outlet into sensitive waters,not that landscape slopes cannot generate significant pollution. 2. Potential surface water quality impacts of the project could specifically arise from pesticides and fertilizers applied to landscaping,improperly collected wastes from pets owned by the future residents, as well as the project's contribution of pollutants from runoff in general to any sensitive waters the City's storm drain system may discharge to. 3. Mitigations for potential project water quality impacts could reasonably include all of: A. Preparation of a construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan under State National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)requirements; B. Incorporation of Federal EPA/NOAA guidance measures for coastal nonpoint source pollution; and C. Incorporation of other measures from the State Urban Runoff Technical Advisory Committee Report and Recommendations, as well as D. The standard requirement for development of a long-term post-construction water quality management plan,describing commitments to installation and maintenance of structural facilities and conduct of non-structural Best Management Practices(BMPs) consistent with the Drainage Area Management Plan(DAMP)New Development Appendix. OPEN SPACE/RECREATION i I 4. The proposed annexation is sited contiguous to future Harriett M.Wieder Regional Park ! (HMWRP). Therefore,the following conditions of approval should be applied: Prior to the issuance of grading permits,the applicant should submit an urban edge treatment plan for approval by the City of Huntington Beach,in consultation with the Manager,Public Facilities and Resources Department/Harbors,Beaches and Parks. The urban edge treatment plan should screen development from the regional park and protect the regional park from intrusive urban views. The landscape plans should include only non-invasive plant species to preserve native habitat within the regional park. 5. Drainage Considerations: A. No runoff from the development should drain onto HMWRP land. ' B. All runoff should be directed through a City water reservoir site and approved outlet system into HMWRP. C. Rear yards should drain to front of property and street. 6. Land Use Considerations: A. There should be restricted use(i.e. CCR's)of rear slopes requiring drought/fire tolerant non-invasive landscaping,not allowing improvements (i.e. structures, storage, or other uses)which would visually or physically impact the public open space. B. Consideration should be given to an improvement setback from the rear of the construction pad to control construction of structures (i.e.building additions and free standing structures)that would further visually impact the public open space. C. There should be architectural CCR's to assure that any structural additions or freestanding structures match the architectural character of the original structure. Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the EA. If you have any questions,please contact me or feel free to call Charlotte Harryman directly. Charlotte may be reached at(714) 834-2522. Very truly yours, eorge Btitton,Manager Environmental and Project Planning Services Division f CH ATTACHMENT 9 (7) July 5, 2000 -Council/Agency Minutes - ,Page 7 (City Council) Discussion Re: County-wide Street Sweeping Program (800.10) Mayor Garofalo continued the dialogue initiated by Councilmember Bauer relative to instituting a county-wide street sweeping program. Note: The Following is a Three-Part Public Hearing Continued Open from June 19, 2000: Mayor Garofalo recused himself from consideration of the following public hearing. (City Council) Public Hearing—Continued Open From June 19, 2000 - Part 1 of 3 — Denied PLC Land Company Annexation of 2.7 Acres w/o Edwards Street, s/o Ellis Avenue, n/o Fire Station 6 and Denied Negative Declaration (Environmental Status) No. 99-18— Denied Adoption of Resolution No. 2000-60 (610.30) (City Council) Public Hearing—Continued Open From June 19, 2000 - Part 2 of 2 — Denied Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2,Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1, Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 00-1, (PLC Land Co. Zoning Designation) — Denied Introductions of Ordinance Nos. 3472 and 3473 (610.30) (City Council) Public Hearing—Continued Open From June 19, 2000 - Part 3 of 3— Denied Appeal Filed by PLC Land Company of Planning Commission's Tentative Tract Map No. 15690 and Denied Appeal of Denial of Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14 (PLC Land Co. 10 Unit Single Family Residential Subdivision) (610.30) Mayor Pro Tern Harman announced that this was the time scheduled to consider the following public hearing: ApplicantlAppellant: PLC Land Company, c/o Bill Holman Request: To annex and establish a low density residential (Holly Seacliff Specific Plan RL-1) zoning designation on approximately 2.7 acres in order to construct a 10-unit single family residential subdivision on a parcel with greater than a three (3)foot grade differential between l the high and low points. The request includes amending the boundaries and text of the City's Local Coastal Program and Holly Seacliff Specific Plan to include the proposed development. 1 Location: West side of Edwards Street, approximately 150 feet south of Ellis Avenue (north of Fire Station). 1 Environmental Status: An initial environmental assessment for the above item was processed and completed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. It was determined that Item#1, with mitigation,would not have any significant environmental effects and that a mitigated negative declaration is warranted. Prior to acting on the request, the City Council must review and act on the negative declaration. The environmental assessment is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Planning Department, 2000 Main Street, and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Planning Department. Legal notice as provided to the City Clerk's Office by staff had been mailed, published and posted. Communication received dated June 3, 2000,from FANS (Friends & Neighbors of Seacliff) ` received in support of appeal (D-3c) t: Communication received dated June 6, 2000,from Heffernan & Boortz,Attorneys at Law, written to PLC Land Company re Public Hearing. i (8) July 5, 2000 - Council/Agency minutes - Page 8 Planning Director Howard Zelefsky presented a slide show report titled PLC Land Company Annexation and 10 Unit Subdivision —Annexation Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2— Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1 Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 00-1 Tentative Tract Map No. 15690— Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14 Negative Declaration No. 99-18— (Continued from June 19, 2000 Meeting). Planning Director Zelefsky introduced Ms. Laurie McKinley, MNA Associates, whom he stated is available to answer questions relative to the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) annexation procedure. Senior Planner Scott Hess responded to Councilmember Green's inquiries relative to the joint Planning Commission and staff recommendation to deny Tract Map 15690. Discussion followed regarding the impact on the Bolsa Chica of the project's restrictions on grading. Mayor Pro Tern Harman declared the public hearing open. The City Clerk announced the Late Communications which pertain to the public hearing: 1. Communication dated June 29, 2000 from Amigos de Bolsa Chica transmitting their concerns relative to the proposed project. The communication is titled 1. PLC Land Company Annexation of 2.7 Acres/Negative Declaration 99-18. 2. Zoning Map Amendment 99-21LCP Amendment 000-1. 3. Tentative Tract Map No. 15690/CUP 99-14. 2. Slide show presentation submitted by the Planning Department to the City Clerk's Office on July 5, 2000. The slide show presentation is titled PLC Land Company Annexation and 10 Unit Subdivision—Annexation Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2—Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1 Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 00-1 Tentative Tract Map No. 15690— Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14 Negative Declaration No. 99-18—(Continued from June 19, 2000 Meeting). 3. Communication submitted by.PLC Land Company to the City Clerk's Office on July 5, 2000 from Southern California Edison Company(SCEC) dated March 31, 2000 regarding Tract i Map No. 15690. The communication is titled Tract Map No. 15690. Eileen Murphy spoke as a member of the Bolsa Chica Land Trust in opposition to the annexation of county property in order to construct a 10-unit family subdivision. Ms. Murphy stated that the city does not need additional housing, nor can it afford to supply water to the development. Flossie Horgan, Bolsa Chica Land Trust, spoke in opposition to annexation for the development of housing. She stated that it would be consistent to zone to open space. She spoke relative to urban runoff. Ms. Horgan urged the Council to vote against the PLC Land t Company project until such time that the city determines the source of pollution. Corrie Broussard Seacliff communityresident, informed Council that she would be leased to P see the PLC Land Company development built near her home. She stated that the addition of the ten homes will be an asset to the area. Ms. Broussard urged Council approval of the proposed project as she believes it will cause property values to increase. (9) July 5, 2000 - Council/Agency Minutes a Page 9 Suzanne Beukema expressed her appreciation to Councilmember Bauer and numerous staff members whom she acknowledged as being involved in the proposed project. Nis. Beukema spoke in support of PLC Land Company, stating that the developer is a quality builder concerned with reducing density and with providing sound infrastructure improvements. She suggested a meeting of the homeowners associations and city staff in an effort to move forward with the proposed Harriet Weider Linear Park project. Ms. Beukema stated her belief that the two lots that are in question require only minimal grading; that the plan is consistent with the surrounding area. Terry Dolton spoke on behalf of the Amigos de Bolsa Chica, referring to the Late Communication from the Amigos de Bolsa Chica announced earlier by the City Clerk. The communication is dated June 29, 2000 and titled 1. PLC Land Company Annexation of 2.7 Acres/Negative Declaration 99-18. 2. Zoning Map Amendment 99-21LCP Amendment 000-1. 3. Tentative Tract Map No. 15690/CUP 99-14. Mr. Dolton referred to what the communication relayed about the organization's inability to have a member present, stating that he is speaking on its behalf. He informed Council that he is rebutting the proponents' assertions made that the elevation grade change is gradual. He expressed his concern over the fact that the proposed development will exacerbate existing environmental problems which he listed as the crumbling of homes down the hills, drainage, erosion, and deterioration of the wetlands area, as well as inaccessibility to the proposed linear park. Bill Holman, Developer, PLC Land Company responded to the last speaker, Mr. Dolton stating that the proposed project will not impede access to the linear park nor diminish its width. He informed Council that the area is more of a liability left undeveloped, since project plans will incorporate a drainage system to treat runoff to the park. Mr. Holman stated his opposition to the Planning Commission and staff recommended findings for denial of Tentative Tract Map No. 15690, which set forth that the proposed lot configuration is not compatible with the existing topography. He stated his opinion that the grading of the tract would in fact be limited and should not encroach upon the future park site. He stated that the question at hand is one of grading, and not one of the number of property lots to be subdivided. Mr. Holman quoted real estate prices for which the homes are anticipated to sell. He expressed his belief that it would be unfair to deny the staff recommended action, since an obligation to build is set forth in the mitigation agreement. There being no persons present to speak further on the matter and there being no further protests filed, either written or oral, the hearing was closed by Mayor Pro Tern Harman. x Ms. Laurie McKinley of MNA Associates answered questions relative to pursuing annexation through the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) if the project is denied, stating that the question of the property tax split between city and county would then arise. Considerable discussion followed relative as to how the Council decision would affect the criteria set forth in the mitigation agreement and the zoning of the Specific Plan, including issues regarding annexation of the 2.7 acre parcel as open space. (Public Hearing Continued on the Next Page) (10) July 5, 2000 - Council/Agency Minutes - Page 10 (City Council) Public Hearing —Continued Open From dune 19, 2000 - Pa 1 of 3— Denied PLC Land Company Annehation of 2.7 Acres w/o Edwards Street, s/o Ellis Avenue, n/o Fire Station 6 and Denied Negative Declaration (Environmental Status) No. 99-18— Denied Adoption of Resolution No. 2000-60 (610.30) A motion was made by Green, second Sullivan to: 1. Deny Negative Declaration No. 99-18 with findings as set forth in (Attachment No. 1)* and Recommend Denial of the Annexation of 2.7 Acres to the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) per Planning Commission Recommended Action. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Sullivan, Harman, Green, Bauer NOES: Julien, Dettloff ABSTAIN: Garofalo ABSENT: None *Attachment No. 1 Findings for Denial Negative Declaration No. 99-18 i Findings for Denial —Negative Declaration No. 99-18: 1. The proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment. The proposed I residential use will impact views to and from Wieder Regional Park. In addition, the l project may result in drainage impacts to surrounding properties. proposed P 1 Y 9 P 9P P 2. The Local Coastal Program amendment to the Huntington Beach Local Coastal Program to modify the boundary of the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan to incorporate the subject property and to establish the RL-1 zoning designation is not consistent with the existing Open Space designation in the County of Orange. (City Council) Public Hearing —Continued Open From June 19,2000- Part 2 of 2 —Denied Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2, Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1, Local Coastal [ Program Amendment No. 00-1, (PLC Land Co. Zoning Designation) —Denied Introductions of Ordinance No. 3472 and Ordinance No. 3473 (610.30) Following the June 19, 2000 Council meeting staff prepared a corrected Attachment No. 7 t (Findings for Denial). A motion was made by Green, second Sullivan to deny Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2, Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1, and Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 00-1 with findings for denial as set forth in ATTACHMENT NO. 7* per Planning Commission I Recommended Action. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Julien, Sullivan, Harman, Green, Dettloff, Bauer NOES: None ABSTAIN: Garofalo ABSENT: None (Public Hearing Continued on the Next Page) 1= t- l• f. f': (11) July 5, 2000 - Council/Agency Minutes - Page 11 Attachment No. 7 Findings for Denial Negative Declaration No. 99-18/Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 00-1 Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2/Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1 Findings for Denial —Negative Declaration No. 99-18/Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 00-1: 1. The proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment. The proposed residential use will impact views to and from Wieder Regional Park. In addition, the proposed project may result in drainage impacts to surrounding properties. 2. The Local Coastal Program amendment to the Huntington Beach Local Coastal Program to modify the boundary of the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan to incorporate the subject property and to establish the RL-1 zoning designation is not consistent with the existing Open Space designation in the County of Orange. Findings for Denial —Zoning Map Amendment No. 99.2/Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1: 1. Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2 and Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1 to establish a zoning designation of Holly Seacliff Specific Plan (RL-1)on a 2.7 acre parcel, and to incorporate the subject property into the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan is not compatible with the County of Orange General Agriculture zoning designation and the adjacent Wieder Regional Park land use. 2. In the case of a general land use provision, the zoning map and text amendment are not compatible with the uses authorized in, and the standards prescribed for, the zoning district for which it is proposed. The proposed zoning would allow estate residential uses inconsistent with the adjacent open space and public facility land uses. (City Council) Public Hearing—Continued Open From June 19, 2000 - Part 3 of 3 —Denied Appeal Filed by PLC Land Company of Planning Commission's Tentative Tract Map No. 15690 and Denial of Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14(PLC Land Co. 10 Unit Single Family Residential Subdivision) (610.30) A motion was made by Green, second Sullivan to deny Tentative Tract Map No..15690 and Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14 with Findings for Denial as set forth in ATTACHMENT NO. 1 per Planning Commission recommended action. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: ' AYES: Julien, Sullivan, Harman, Green, Dettloff, Bauer NOES: None ABSTAIN: Garofalo ABSENT: None (Public Hearing Continued on the Next Page) (12) July 5, 2000 - Council/Agency Minutes - Page 12 *Attacnnent No. 1 Tentative Tract Map No. 15690 Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14 Findings for Denial — Negative Tentative Tract Map No. 15690: 1. Tentative Tract Map No. 15690 for the grading and subdivision of 2.7 net acres for 10 single family residences is not consistent with goals and policies of the General Plan. The proposed lot configuration requires grading, including approximately 12,500 cubic yards of import soil, which is not compatible with the existing topography of the surrounding area. The proposed tract will be up to 13 feet higher than the grade of the Wieder Regional Park to the west. 2. The site is not physically suitable for the type and density of development without substantially altering the natural topography of the site. The site will require to be raised approximately 13 feet on the west end of the tract in order to accommodate development of two additional units at the end of the cul-de-sac. The modification to the existing variation in grade is not in keeping with the goals and policies of General Plan which encourages development within existing neighborhoods to be compatible with existing structures, including the use of building heights, grade elevations, orientation, and bulk that are compatible with the surrounding development. Findings for Denial —Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14 for the development of a 10 unit single family residential subdivision on a site with greater than a three foot differential between the high and low points may be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. The import of approximately 12,500 cubic yards of soil to the site will substantially impact the aesthetic appearance of the area to and from the site,which may adversely impact the value of properties in the area. The property can be developed with less impact to the existing topography. 2. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan which encourages preserving the natural topography. The proposed soil import and grading of the site will not be compatible with the adjacent topography of the Wieder Regional Park. Consent Calendar Items Deferred from June 1.9, 2000 Consent Calendar—Item Removed for Separate Discussion The following item was removed from the Consent Calendar for separate discussion: (Redevelopment Agency) Deferred from June 19, 2000 - Project Plans and Specifications and Advertisement for Bids for the Construction of the 51h Street Parking Plan (Between Walnut and Orange Avenues) CC-1116—Pursuant to Plaza Almeria Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA)—Sample Contract. ATTACHMENT 10 Estate Residential ••—••—••— •—••—•--••--•—•- (city ofx.B.) W Open Space Open Space _ _ — (County of Orange) — Subj ect property �- i Ellis • ssaeK 46 j AC wV.b 7 - Sq K Estate Residential" EXISTING B Estate Residential GENERAL PLAN S= . _ zs C4K � .. k; DESIGNATION T'�'—" ` A ~ O S ••\\\ 1 E b AC 81 "magi A3 ` E afw.0 E PAM i D9 16 AC 66 AC +ww s OS „' a ; 13AC M E D8 os 06 �• 14 A 7Co M IAH - sir`• ``1- — ~--- 13 AC ��- -.- to ,.a ,c a { W Open Space Open Space Subject property ' Ellis ---- c AC Estate Residential --�- �'�"` I ��Gvu _ _ _ Estate Residential ° PROPOSED -GENERAL PLAN Estate Residential25 AC 3 % DESIGNATION w \' -1 r \\ AC 3EAC 23 61 new E ss AC ' Dg 16 AC +a w O S s: 13 AC M � D8 DS D6 ATTACHMENT I I A-1 (Residential Agriculture) (County of Orange) Open Space Ellis Avenue Subject property Rw a EXISTING ; F1 aysoaoa�wca a� .W, ZONING I_.R�.,__ F3 s Garfield Avenue G RM t ; Open Space I Subject property Ellis Avenue RL-1 (Holly Seacliff Specific Plan)' . (City of Huntington Beach) R41 _ PROPOSED -2601DfM111ilT ZONING (--R�.,__ .w, cs CS Garfield Avenue ...,. AM f,•i J ATTACHMENT 12 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15690 CHRONOLOGY July 1, 1998 PLC submitted application to LAFCO requesting annexation of 2.71 acres to City of Huntington Beach. October 14, 1998 PLC submitted applications to City for Tentative Tract Map No. 15690 and Environmental Assessment($5,640). November 13, 1998 Notice of Filing Status prepared. General plan amendment, zoning map amendment and variance required. (GPA requirement removed November 20, 1998). November 1998 Fiscal Impact Analysis for PLC annexation completed for City by MNA Consulting/Rosenow Spevacek Group. Project generates surplus for City. December 2, 1998 LAFCO distributed PLC annexation request to agencies for comment. February 23, 1999 County resolution approving City-County tax sharing agreement approved by County Board of Supervisors. March 8, 1999 PLC submitted applications for Zoning Map Amendment and Variance for reduced frontage on four lots ($6,380). Tentative tract map and site plan revised per Public Works direction to reverse proposed drainage pattern, reduce proposed fill on all lots, and add storm drain to drain site to south through reservoir site. April 7, 1999 Notice of Filing Status prepared. Staff feels the proposed amount of fill is excessive and suggests terracing lots, sloping back yards or contour grading of buffer areas. Variance request not supported. CUP required for site with greater than three feet of grade differential. April 14, 1999 Environmental Assessment Committee review of environmental assessment. Environmental Assessment (EA) routed for 30-day public comment. May 21, 1999 End of 30-day public comment period on EA. May 26, 1999 PLC submitted revised TTM, site plan and CUP application ($2,850). Variances eliminated on two of four lots. See attached PLC letter dated May 25, 1999 and Walden & Associates letter dated May 19, 1999 responding to staff recommendation for terraced or sloped lots. June 30, 1999 Subdivision Committee meeting. Denial of TTM 15690 recommended. July 1, 1999 Staff letter to PLC on follow up issues. July 7, 1999 PLC letter to staff responding to issues of private streets and general plan consistency. October 1, 1999 Notice of Filing Status prepared. Application deemed complete for processing. Staff not supporting RL zoning. November 9, 1999 Planning Commission study session. February 10, 2000 PLC submitted application for Zoning Text Amendment and Local Coastal Program Amendment ($8,040), requesting approval of Holly Seacliff Specific Plan RL-1 zoning, minimum 7,000 square foot lots. Variance request eliminated. March 28, 2000 Planning Commission recommends approval of ZMA 99-2, ZTA 00-1, LCPA 00-1,ND 99-18 and denies TTM 15690 and CUP 99-14. E April 4, 2000 PLC files appeal of Planning Commission denial of TTM 15690 and CUP 99-14. April 11, 2000 Planning Commission votes 5-2 to reconsider approval of ZMA, ZTA, LCPA and ND. May 9, 2000 Planning Commission votes 2-2 on motion to approve ZMA, ZTA, LCPA & ND; votes 4-0 on motion to deny so that item can forwarded to City Council. June 19, 2000 Scheduled City Council public hearing continued to July 5, 2000. July 5, 2000 City Council votes 4-2 to deny negative declaration and annexation, and 6- 0 to deny zoning amendment, tentative tract map and conditional use permit. August 22, 2000 PLC re-initiates annexation request with Local Area Formation Commission(LAFCO). September 7, 2000 PLC files a dispute under Section 3.4 of Development Agreement No. 90- 1 and requests that the City reconsider denial of the entitlements or that the dispute be submitted to a retired Superior Court judge for arbitration. September 15, 2000 PLC files claim for damages (Claim No. 99-169). September 20, 2000 LAFCO notifies City of PLC's re-initiation of annexation request and specifies due process for mediation. September 25, 2000 City rejects PLC claim for damages. October 18, 2000 City Council approves an agreement between City and PLC agreeing to toll all statutes of limitations for potential claims related to the dispute for a period of six months. November 20, 2000 City Council approves Resolution No. 2000-112, stating that the tax- sharing formula between City and County for subject property is to be per the Master Property Tax Agreement dated October 28, 1980. I January 19, 2001 PLC meets with representatives of City Attorney and Planning { Department. City staff suggests PLC re-apply for approval of Estate Residential prezoning only. March 7, 2001 PLC presents counter proposal requesting City approval of an amendment to Development Agreement No. 90-1 to adopt Residential Low Density prezoning and to vest the property for a future subdivision of a minimum of eight minimum 8,000 square foot lots in accordance with a conceptual site plan submitted. An extension of the October 18, 2000 Tolling E' Agreement is also requested for the period of time necessary for approval r of the Development Agreement amendment. f April 2, 2001 City Council closed session to consider PLC proposal to resolve dispute. No action taken. ; April 18, 2001 PLC files combined mandamus and damages lawsuit in Orange County t Superior Court. ' April 19, 2001 PLC files a petition for an order compelling arbitration and order staying P P p g Y g 1 lawsuit in Orange County Superior Court. May 11, 2001 PLC requests LAFCO to issue a Certificate of Filing of PLC's annexation request. June 13, 2001 LAFCO approves Certificate of Filing and schedules hearing on PLC's annexation request. !` i; f: t!}[r= 1,. IPPF June 19, 2001 City makes oral motion to dismiss PLC lawsuit;no action taken. July 11, 2001 LAFCO approves PLC's annexation request (Resolution No. CA 98-07). July 16, 2001 Superior Court Judge Brenner issues order granting PLC's motion to compel arbitration and stay the lawsuit. August 3, 2001 Judge Brenner issues second order granting PLC's motion to compel arbitration, denying PLC's motion to stay the lawsuit, denying City's motion to dismiss lawsuit, dismissing PLC's lawsuit, but allowing PLC to reopen lawsuit for future proceedings. August 22, 2001 LAFCO conducts conducting authority (protest) hearing and adopts Resolution No. CA 98-07P, ordering annexation without election. August 24, 2001 City staff and PLC meet to discuss potential alternative development concepts and settlement of disputes. September 4, 2001 City Council authorizes City Attorney to negotiate a settlement agreement with PLC. September 14, 2001 PLC submits revised TTM and CUP applications and plans for development of eight single family homes. October 18, 2001 LAFCO Certificate of Completion of annexation recorded. ,I r z o � rn -- ao EIGHT LOT SUBDIVISION (PARCEL 7A) Z7 n"' h7 s PLC LAND COMPANY c ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. 99-2 ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 00-1 LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT NO. 00-1 TENTAT VE TRACT MAP NO. 15690 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 99-1 4 NEGATIVEI DECLARATION NO. 99-1 8 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ❖ ESTABLISH ESTATE RESIDENTIAL ZONING ON PROPERTY (HOLLY SEACLIFF SPECIFIC PLAN) ❖ AMEND LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AND HOLLY SEACLIFF SPECIFIC PLAN TO IN ORPORATE SUBJECT PROPERTY ❖ SUBDIVIDE 2.7 ACRES FOR 8 SFR LOTS ❖ DEVELOP LOT WITH > 3 FT. GRADE DIFFERENCE -T 21 t PROJECT LOCATION ❖2.7 ACRE PARCEL j ❖WEST OF EDWARDS, SOUTH OF ELLIS ❖SURROUNDING USES ❖FIRE STATION NO. 6 ':•ELLIS GOLDENWEST RESIDENTIAL (ACROSS EDWARDS) •i•WIEDER REGIONAL PARK BACKGROUND ❖HOLLY SEACLIFF GPA AND EIR APPROVED IN 1990 DESIGNATING PROPERTY AS ESTATE RESIDENTIAL (4 UNITS/ACRE) ❖PROPERTY COVERED UNDER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ONCE ANNEXED ❖ANNEXATION RECORDED OCT. 2001 2 'BACKGROUND ❖ 10: UNIT PROPOSAL DENIED BY CITY COUNCIL IN JULY 2000 ❖PLC FILED LAWSUIT AGAINST CITY -.*.REVISED 8 LOT PROPOSAL RESUBMITTED IN SEPT. 2001 ❖REVISED PLAN ADDRESSES STAFF CONCERNS ON AESTHETICS AND VIEW IMPACTS TO AND FROM WIEDER REGIONAL PARK ZONING ❖PROPOSED HOLLY SEACLIFF ZONING IS CONSISTENT WITH ESTATE RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION IN GENERAL PLAN ❖MODIFIES BOUNDARY (EXHIBITS, TEXT) OF HOLLY SEACLIFF SPECIFIC PLAN AND LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM TO INCLUDE SUBJECT PROPERTY ❖COMPATIBLE WITH SURROUNDING RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS AND LAND USES (ELLIS GOLDENWEST, BLUFFS) 3 i REVISED SUBDIVISION MAP ❖8 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS ❖LOT SIZES: 8,372 TO 19,340 SQ. FT. (12,772 AVG.) ❖ 15 FT. WIDE LANDSCAPE EASEMENT ALONG EDWARDS ST. COMPATIBLE WITH FIRE STATION AND THE BLUFFS ❖ACCESS TO PUBLIC CUL-DE-SAC FROM EDWARDS ST. ❖IMPORT OF APPROX. 4,300 CU. YDS. OF SOIL TO DESIGN DRAINAGE AND SEWER FLOW I SUBDIVISION ❖GRADING UP TO 1 1 FT. OF FILL TOWARD NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT ❖SLOPE LANDSCAPE CONDITION ALONG TRACT BOUNDARY TO WIEDER PARK ❖RESTRICTION OF GRADING AND STRUCTURES ON AND BELOW SLOPE ❖REVIEW OF RESIDENTIAL UNIT SITING REQUIRED BY PLANNING COMMISSION 4 STAFF RECOMMENDATION STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL : ❖P OPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION AND ESTATE RES DENTIAL LAND USE COMPATIBLE WITH SUR OUNDING LAND USES ❖S BDIVISION IS CONSISTENT WITH HOLLY SEA LIFF SPECIFIC PLAN ❖N ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS WITH IMPLEMENTATION OF MITIGATION MEASURES Oil f�6 y j r• a OGi '! a am �� � 5 r } 4 -y i 1S r tk/M y � 3 / /r q p,13 6 LAW OFFICES PALMIERI, TYLER, WIENER, WILHELM & WALDRON LLP A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS 2603 MAIN STREET ANGELO J. PALMIERI (1926-1996) EAST TOWER-SUITE 1300 P. O. BOX 19712 `, ROBERT F. WALDRON (1927-1998) IRVINE, CA 92623-97I2� , IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92614-6228 , ALAN H. WIENER* GARY C. WEISBERG ROBERT C. IHRKE* MICHAEL H. LEIFER (949) a51-9400 WRITERS DIRECT JAMES E. WILHELM* SCOTT R. CARPENTER www.ptwww.com DIAL NUMBER DENNIS G. TYLER* RICHARD A. SALUS MICHAEL J. GREENE* NORMAN J. RODICH (949) 851-7294 FRANK C. ROTHROCK* D. SUSAN WIENS mleifer@ptwww.com DENNIS W. GHAN* RONALD M. COLE February 4, 2002 DAVID D. PARR* LUCEE S. KIRKA FACSIMILE (949) 8S1-1554 CHARLES H. KANTER* PAUL B. LA SCALA GEORGE J. WALL MICHAEL L. D'ANGELO (949) BSI-3844 L. RICHARD RAWLS CHARLES S. KROLIKOWSKI (949) 757-122S PATRICK A. HENNESSEY DAROLYN Y. HAMADA (949) 851-2351 DON FISHER STEPHEN A. SCHECK Cam' GREGORY N. WEILER HEATHER C. WHITMORE C WARREN A. WILLIAMS ELISE L. ENOMOTO r+ JOHN R. LISTER RYAN M. EASTER "iFjEFER-PTO FILE-NO. CYNTHIA M. WOLCOTT GRACE LEE rT1 �"';' 6_ JOEL P. KEW DAVID H. CULMER .(�] 1_fi 1 63,L0r, MICHELLE M. FUJIMOTO , 61.::1- 4 OF COUNSEL *' MARTIN J. STEIN -'{'�'� 'A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION `✓ �... +'It VIA PERSONAL SERVICE Connie Brockway CD p I� City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 Re: Zoning Map Amendment No. 99-2/Zoning Text Amendment No. 00-1/Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 00- 1/Tentative Tract Map No. 15690 (R) /Negative Declaration No. 99-18 (PLC 8 Unit Single Family Subdivision) Dear Ms. Brockway: This firm represents John A. Thomas, who owns and operates oil wells and related facilities in close proximity to the above- referenced proposed residential development. We have received notice of the City Council 's intention to consider approving this project (hereinafter collectively ,r-eferred to as "Tentative Tract Map No. 15690 (R) ") at the public hearing on February 4, 2002 , at 7 : 00 p.m. The purpose of this letter is to provide Mr. Thomas' written objection to Tentative Tract Map No. 15690 (R) , as currently constituted, in lieu of personally appearing at the hearing. We request that this letter be included as part of the formal record on this agenda item. Mr. Thomas objects to the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 15690 (R) on the ground that the environmental impacts of constructing a residential development in such close proximity to his oil well operations have not been considered or addressed. The City's entire file concerning Tentative Tract Map No. 15690 (R) is devoid of any reference to Mr. Thomas ' operations, which are conducted within feet of the proposed project's western boundary. The lone environmental assessment L ' PALMIERI, TYLER, WIENER, WILHELM & WALDRON LLP Connie Brockway February 4, 2002 Page 2 performed in conjunction with the project, Negative Declaration No. 99-18, describes the development only as being adjacent to the City's proposed Harriett M. Wieder Regional Park. The environmental assessment for Tentative Tract Map No. 15690 (R) is incomplete until it takes into account the actual usage of the neighboring property. At a minimum, the developer should be required to provide explicit notice of the oil operations to all prospective owners and occupants of property within the proposed development. Very t y yours MHL:cgA. fer cc: Scott F. Field I PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA) .. SS. NOTICE OF NOTICE IS HEREBY County of Orange ) PUBLIC HEARING GIVEN that an initial BEFORE THE CITY environmental assess- BEFORE for Item:No.. 1 1 was COUNCIL OF. THE processed and com- CITY OF pleted ins accordance l am a Citizen of the United States and a HUNTINGTON with the California BEACH Environmental Quality resident of the County aforesaid; I am NOTICE IS HEREBY Act. It that Item as with mi determined GIVEN that on Monday, than, would not have any over the age of eighteen ears and not a February 4, 2002,City significant environmen- t 7:00 PM in the City to effects and that a party to or interested in the below Council Chambers, mitigated negative dec- 2000 Main Street, Hunt- laration is warranted. ington Beach, the City Prior to acting on the re- entit entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of Council will hold a public oast, the City Council . the HUNTINGTON BEACH INDEPENDENT a hearing on the f zoftg must review and act on i �lensing and zoftfihg the negative declaration. tams: The environmental as- newspaper of general circulation printed 1. ZONING MAP b r AMENDMENT- z NO. $�s"e^t is on file at the 99-2/ZONING TEXT City of Huntington an pu lished in the City of Huntington AMENDMENT NO. Beach Planning Depart Beach, ' County of Orange State of PROGRAM COASTAL merit, 2vai Main Street, I PROGRAM AMEND-! and is available.for pub- :NO. �00.1/,;lie inspection and cpm- California, and that attached Notice is a TENTATIVE TRACT' ment by contacting the MAP NO. J5690(la/ Planning Department, or true and complete copy as was printed CONDITIONAL USE by telephoning (714) PERMIT NO 99-14(R1/ 536.5271. NEGATIVE DECLA A- NOTICE IS.HEREBY an published in the Huntington Beach GIVEN that Item No.2 is UNITTION SINGLE LE (PLC 8 categorically exempt and Fountain Valle issues of said UNIT SINGLE FAMILY 9 y P Y SUBDIVISION) Appli- from the provisions of ' cant: PLC Land Corn- the C a l i f o r n i a newspaper to wit the issue(s) of: pony, c/o Bill Holman, Environmental Quality Request: ZMA: To. as. Act. tabl!sh an estate. rash- ON FILE: A copy of the dential zoning designa- proposed request is on tion (Roily Seacliff Spa-. file in the City Clerk's Of- cific Plan RL-1) on ap- fice, 2000 Main Street, proximately 2.7 acres. Huntington Beach, Cali- LCPA/ZTA: To amend fomia 92648, for inspec- J a n u a r y 24, 2002 the boundaries and text tion by the public.A copy of the City's Local of the staff report will be Coastal Program and available to interested Holly Seacliff Specific: parties at City Hall or the Plan to include ,he Main City L!brary (7111 proposed dove[ ant. Talbert Avenue) after TTM/CUP: To tsU January 30, 2002. I declare, under penalty of perjury that nto eight lots 2.7 nrea ALL' INTERESTED r Into eght to for sln8le PERSONS are invited to the foregoing is true and correct. family, residential I attend said hearing and ptirposes on a parcel(1 express opinions or - submit.evidence for or cooler than a three against the application with 9 as outlined above. If you (3) foot grade differentia[ challenge the City Coun- between the high and cil's action in court, you Executed on January 24� 2002 low points. Location: may be limited to raising West ,side of Edwards only those issues you or at Costa Mesa, California. Street; approximately someone else raised at 150 feet south of EUis the public hearing de- Avenue (north of Fire scribed in this notice, Station) Project Planner: or in written cor- Wayne Carvalho respondence delivered 2. ANNUAL REVIEW .to the City at or prior to, OF THE HOLLY- the public hearing. If SEACLIFF DEVELOP- there are any further MENT AGREEMENT questions please call the (NO. 90-1) COM- planning Department at _- PLIANCE REPORT Ap- :536-5271 and refer to I plicant: City of Hunt- :;(tie above items. Direct ington Beach Request: -your.written communica- Annual review o the lions to the City Clerk. Signature Holly-Seacliff Develop- tacnnfe Brockway, ment Agreement Com• City Clerk, pliance Report. Loca• city of tion: Approximately 490 ! �tington Beach, acres located between 2000 Main Street, Ellis Avenue on the 2nd Floor, north, Huntington Street Huntington Beach, on the east, Edwards California 92548 Street on the west, and (714) 536-5227 the Seacliff Golf Course Published Huntington on the South Beach Independent Jan- Project Planner: Mary gory 24. 2002 014.688 Beth Broeren 1 � - EL MEETING DATE: February 4, 2002 DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: REQUESTING: Planning PLC 8 Lot Subdivision Planning Annual Review of the Holly Seacliff Dev. Agreement i I TODAY'S DATE January 18, 2002 VERIFIED BY ADMININSTRATION: APPROVED BY: Ray Si ver City Administrator 1/18/02 10:39 AM CITY COUNCIL/REDE� 'LOPMENT AGENCY r PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST --2H4 Qq-a, 07-4 DO-/ SUBJECT: f l-G t-CPA 00-r , � 1�90��), c� 9q-l�� DEPARTMENT �l// 1M l�j MEETING DATE . *, yoo'3— '�e� l7 CONTACT W AV if chRUA PHONE: x SSgS Please refer to Section 3 of the "Agenda Process Manual" N/A VES NO ❑ ( ❑ Is the notice attached? ❑ /�� ❑ Do the Heading and Closing of Notice reflect City Council (and/or Redevelopment Agency) hearing? ❑ ✓M ❑ Are the date, day, &time of the public hearing correct? �p ❑ ❑ If an appeal, is the appellant's name included in the notice? ❑ ,E) ❑ Is there an Envirormental Status to be approved by Council? ❑ ❑ A Is a map attached for publication? ❑ ❑ Is a larger advertisement required? Size ❑ / ❑ Is the the verification statment attached indicating the source and accuracy of the mailing list? ❑ ❑ Are the applicant's name and address part of the mailing label? ❑ ❑ Are the appelant's name and address part of the mailing label? vp ❑ ❑ If a Coastal Development Permit, does the notice include appeal language? �l ❑ ❑ If Coastal Development Permit, is the Coastal Commission included in of the mailing labels ❑ ❑ If Coastal Development Permit, are the residents labels attached? ❑ ❑ Is the Report 33433 attached? (Economic Development Items only) What is the minimum number of day from publication to the hearing date? What is the minimum number of times to be published? What is the specified number of days between publications? I fq,j Ol-19-0-2 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday, February 4, 2002, at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following planning and zoning items: �. ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. 99-2/ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 00-1/1-OCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT NO. 00-1/TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15690(R)/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 99-14(R)/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 99-18 (PLC 8 UNIT SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION) Applicant: PLC Land Company, c/o Bill Holman Request: ZMA: To establish an estate residential zoning designation (Holly Seacliff Specific Plan RL-1) on approximately 2.7 acres. LCPA/ZTA: To amend the boundaries and text of the City's Local Coastal Program and Holly Seacliff Specific Plan to include the proposed development. TTM/CUP: To subdivide approximately 2.7 acres into eight lots for single family residential purposes on a parcel with greater than a three (3) foot grade differential between the high and low points. Location: West side of Edwards Street, approximately 150 feet south of Ellis Avenue (north of Fire Station) Project Planner: Wayne Carvalho ❑ 2. ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE HOLLY-SEACLIFF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (NO. 90-1) COMPLIANCE REPORT Applicant: City of Huntington Beach Request: Annual review of the Holly-Seacliff Development Agreement Compliance Report. Location: Approximately 490 acres located between Ellis Avenue on the north, Huntington Street on the east, Edwards Street on the west, and the Seacliff Golf Course on the South Project Planner: Mary Beth Broeren NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an initial environmental assessment for Item No. 1 was processed and completed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. It was determined that Item #1, with mitigation, would not have any significant environmental effects and that a mitigated negative declaration is warranted. Prior to acting on the request, the City Council must review and act on the negative declaration. The environmental assessment is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Planning Department, 2000 Main Street, and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Planning Department, or by telephoning (714) 536-5271. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item No. 2 is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. (gJegals:02cc0204) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING (Continued) ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City Clerk's Office, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library (7111 Talbert Avenue) after January 30, 2002. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning Department at 536-5271 and refer to the above items. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 536-5227 (g:legals:02cc0204) a. y 77 WOW t. SCHEDULE A PROPERTY OWNER'S NOTICE GUARANTEE LIABILITY: $N/A FEE: $N/C Nance of Assured: PLC LAND COMPANY Date of Guarantee: SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 1. That, according to the last equalized "Assessment Roll" in the Office of the Orange County Tax Assessor- a. The persons listed as "Assessed Owner" are shown on the assessment roll as owning real property within 300 feet of the property identified on the assessment roll as Assessor's Parcel Number 110-017-33. b. The Assessor's Parcel Number and any addresses shown on the assessment roll are attached hereto. PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST`B" (MAILING LABELS—October 15,2001 G:Labels\Labels\Public Hearing President 1 Huntington Harbor P 10 H.B. Chamber of Commerce P. O.Box 79 2100 Main Street,Suite 200 Suns ach,CA 90742 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Betty Jo Woollett 2 William D. Holman 11 Sue Johnson 16 Orange County Assoc.of Realtors PLC 19671 Quiet Bay Lane 25552 La Paz Road 19 Corporate Plaza Drive Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Laguna Hills,CA 92653 Newport Beach CA 92660-7912 President 3 Mr.Tom Zanic 12 Edna Littlebury 17 Amigos De Bolsa Chica New Urban West Gldn St Mob.Hm. Owners Leag. 16531 Bolsa Chica Street,Suite 312 520 Broadway Ste. 100 11021 Magnolia Blvd. Huntington Beach,CA 92649 Santa Monica,CA 90401 Garden Grove,CA 92642 Sunset Beach C ty Assoc. 4 Pres.,H.B. Hist Society 13 Pacific Coast Archaeological 18 Pat Thie resident C/O Newland House Museum Society,Inc. P ox 215 19820 Beach Blvd. P.O. Box Sunset Beach,CA 90742-0215 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Co esa,CA 92627 ttn:Jane Gothold President 5 Community Services Dept. 14 County of Orange/EMA 19 Huntington Beach Tomorrow Chairperson :Michael M.Ruane,Dir. PO Box 865 Historical Resources Bd. P.O.Box 4048 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Santa Ana,CA 92702-4048 Julie Vandermost 6 Council on Aging 15 County of Orange/EMA 19 BI_�-OC 1706 Orange: Thomas Mathews 9 Executive Circle#100 Hun ' n Beach,CA 92648 P. O.Box 404& _ _ Irvine Ca 92714-6734 Santa Ana,CA 92702-4048 Richard Spicer 7 Jeff Metzel 16 Planning Department 19 SCAG Seacliff HOA Orange County EMA 818 West 7th, 12th Floor 19391 Shad-Harbor Circle P. O.Box 4048 Los Angeles,CA 90017 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Santa Ana,CA 92702-4048 E.T.I. Corral 100 8 John Roe 16 County of Orange/EMA 19 \fart•Bell Seacliff HOA Tim Miller 20292 Eastwood Cir. 19382 Surfdale Lane P.O. Box 4048 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Santa Ana,CA 92702-4048 Frank Caponi 9 Lou Mannone 16 Planning Dir. 20 Environmental Board Chairman Seacliff HOA City of Costa Mesa 6662 Glen Drive 19821 Ocean Bluff Circle P. O. Box 1200 Huntington Beach,CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Costa Mesa,CA 92628-1200 lSq-39/-40 C��NTOn/ 6E2Ll�Gff 70/ Oce¢W AVM. 57� 2p S41TA-Mob'41- CA 90W2— PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST"B" MAILING LABELS—October 15,2001 " G:labels\labels\Public Hearing Planing Dir. 21 Dr. Gary Rutherford,Superintendent 29 Country View Estates HOA 37 City of Fountain Valley HB City Elementary School Dist. Carrie Thomas 10200 Slater Ave. 20451 Craimer Lane 6642 Trotter Drive Fountain Valley,CA 92708 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Planning Director 22 Jerry Buchanan 29 Country View Estates HOA 37 City of Westminster HB City Elementary School Dist. Gerald Chapman 8200 Westminster Blvd. 20451 Craimer Lane 6742 Shire Circle Westminster,CA 92683 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Planning Director 23 James Jones 30 HB Hamptons HOA 37 City of Seal Beach Ocean View Elementary Keystone Pacific Prop.Mangmt Inc. 211 Eight St. School District 16845 Von Karman Avenue,Suite 200 Seal Beach,CA 90740 17200 Pinehurst Lane Irvine,CA 92606 Huntington Beach CA 92647 California Coastal Commission 24 0—;,, 31 Sally Graham 38 Theresa Henry Westminster School District Meadowlark South Coast Area Office 14121 Cedars ood Avenue 516 g Circle 200 Oceangate,loth Floor Westminster CA 92683 untington Beach,CA 92649 Long Beach,CA 92802-4302 - California Coastal Commission 24 Patricia Koch 32 Cheryle Browning 38 South Coast Area Office HB Union High School Disrict Meadowlark Are 200 Oceangate, loth Floor 10251 Yorktown Avenue 16771 velt Lane Long Beach,CA 92802-4302 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 gton Beach,CA 92649 Robert Joseph 25 CSA 33 Hearthside Homes 39 Caltrans District 12 730 El Camino Way#200 6 Executive Circle_,Suite 250 3337 Michelson Drive,Suite 380 Tustin,CA 92680 Irvine,CA 92614 Irvine,CA 92612-1699 Director 26 Goldenwest Colle e 34 Bolsa Chica Land Trust 40 Local Solid Waste . gy. �' t tn: Fred ns Nancy Donovan O.C. Heal re Agency 7 oIdenwest St. 4831 Los Patos P.O. x 355 untington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach,CA 92649 to Ana,CA 92702 New Growth Coordinator 27 OC County Harbors,Beach 35 Bolsa Chica Land Trust 40 Huntington Beach Post Office and Parks Dept. Evan Henry,President 6771 Warner Ave. P. O.Box 4048 1812 Port Tiffin Place Huntington Beach,CA 92647 Santa Ana,CA 92702-4048 Newport Beach,CA 92660 Marc Ecker 28 Huntington Beach 36 John Scott 41 Fountain Valley Elementary School Dist. Attn: Pat rs-Laude SEHBNA 17210 Oak Street 777 inger Ave. #300 2203 pistrano Lane Fountain Valley CA 92708 untington Beach CA 92647 untington Beach,CA 92646-8309 Bolsa Chica Land Trust 40 5901 Warner Avenue,#103 To AwIve CNaVE2s G.(ND-4 D«DAf Huntington Beach CA 92649-4659 �UIIIROs C&QrRA-1:1 �s8 z pd4o cj2c� th0N-17Af6T01) A�PkC0 00f A" 04 92-6¢8 ` Wo W�aq�� ss � � T7?W4 11001729 11001731 11001733 City Of Huntington Beach County Of Orange Plc 6/p Bi[.L /kLMAn� PO Box 190 PO Box 4048 fM Corporate Plaza Dr'1f� Hunt' each,CA 92648 Santa Ana,CA 92702 Newport Beach,CA 92660 110 017 47 110 151 16 159 391 05 City Of Hun ' each City Of Huntington Beach Central Park#8 P ox 190 PO Box 190 505 Park Ave Huntington Beach,CA 92648 H gton Beach,CA 92648 Newport Beach,CA 92662 159 391 11 159 391 12 159 391 13 Eric Rescigno Dennis&Kathleen Dambra Kevin&Paulette Conlisk 6551 Silverspur Ln 6541 Silverspur Ln 6531 Silverspur Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 159 391 14 159 391 15 159 391 22 Richard&Michele Amaral Edwards-Central Park Homeowners Ass Edwards-Central Park Ho ners Ass 6525 Silverspur Ln 505 Park Ave 505 Park Ave Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Newport Beach,CA 92662 Newp each,CA 92662 159 391 34 159 391 35 159 391 36 Steven Loschiavo Edwards-Central Park eowners Ass Ronald Irving Brindle 6561 Horseshoe Ln 505 Park Ave Emily Ann Brindle Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Newport ach,CA 92662 6521 Silverspur Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92648 159 391 37 159 391 38 159 39139 Central Park One Two Ronald&Stephanie Boss Edwards-Central Park H owners Ass 505 Park Ave 6515 Silverspur Ln 505 Park Ave Newport Beach,CA 92662 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Newport B r,CA 92662 159 391 40 159 391 41 159 391 48 Clinton Gerlach&Family Trust Gerlac Jack&Barbara Falfas Central Park#12 20401 Prairie St 6542 Horseshoe Ln 505 Park Ave Chatsworth,CA 91311 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Newport Beach,CA 92662 159 391 49 159 391 50 159 391 51 Central Park#8 Central Park One Two Central Park One Two 505 Park Ave 505 Park Ave 505 Park Ave \'ewpo ach,CA 92662 Newpo each, CA 92662 Newport B CA 92662 159 391 52 159 391 53 Central Park#8 Richard Davis&Jessica Dorman-Davis 505 Park Ave 6562 Silverspur Ln Newport Bea 92662 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 009151oj aleldwal ash w.LS48a4s P08J 410OWS 159-391-U5 159-391-15 159-391-37 Central Park 48 Edwards-Central Park Homeowners A Central Park One Two 505 Park Ave 505 Park Ave 505 Park Ave Balboa Island, CA 92662 Balboa Island,CA 92662 Balboa Island, CA 92662 159-391-40 159-391-48 159-391-49 Clinton Gerlach Central Park r"12 Central Park 701 Ocean Avenue Ste 203 505 Park Ave 505 P ve Santa Monica, CA 90402 Balboa Island, CA 92662 B oa Island, CA 92662 Connie Brockway, City Clerk , PT 0�V City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 j t'). n:r-_- Huntington Beach, CA 92648 H METER eJ 22.'J'S i 0-t-01--0 S -k Ui 927 01 25 IT4 E7U ING J59 39140 --Minton G ach Family Trust Gerlac 4 St Llk" irie St C C I 1311 SM It k COUNT LEGAL NOTICE— 11 11 If illill III lilt oil fill 1)111 fit IIIIIIIII I 111111111111 fill 11 Connie Brockway, City Clerk L) City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 H M E 1�4P 'k CIA 927 fil/Z5/fP ING 159-391-37 Central Park One Two 505 Park Ave Balboa Island, C F N F;f J 1. �OUN LLB AL NOTICE — PUBLIi H 11:0 IVY h : . i x— J. ----------- Connie Brockway, City Clerk ?V US. "614. City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk n J,322'6�P.O. Box 190 n Huntington Beach, CA 92648 c c r I,, r, H ME7ER 42221�3 Vi Ui 9re-7 01/2lFj/Td X 91A��A 159-391-48 Central Park#12 505 Park Ave hlapd�CA 2662 -Balbo.a', kri LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLE ARII I N0 T K ti,o II I: 11 1111111 It 1 1111 11 IIIS11111111 11 Jl.m 111%]111111111 11 Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk jMq21 P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 H C a m E T E R 4 22 0 (-� 0 ING 159-391-05 P.N.r 4f, Central Park#8 C4 505 Park Ave Balboa Island, CA 92662 i U n N TO SENDEIRI't"-' L E G A h0V( = PUBLIC HEARING 4 ompt-a a Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ,ti LL a C A H METER 422 11) >,! N xx. fA Cfi 927 1..11iZ.5/102. `C—6 ID INGTp�, 159 391 37 Central.Park One Two 505 Park Ave Newport Beach,CA 92662 ' .\ ''Il C 'rr 1 LEGAL NOTICE - PUB C:H A 111r 1'•'•• II111111{Illl�lll11111111f11111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII{I11111111 �i17 1 Connie Brockway, City Clerk a City of Huntington Beach �,c,r \:. � U.S.1'ISSTRtit:' Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 � 81� :y ,,, .� M"' 3 Jrd.2 412 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 4�1= C A 4 METER 42?:?:it I •xx. s.H rH 9e-7 1..31i25i(n INGTQ�, 159 391 15 O� �.wp•.,,o B� Edwards-Central Park Homeowners Ass 505 Park Ave Newport Beach,CA 92662 co T ,r, `;LGAL NOTICE - PUB1�1.G kIARII�C�: ;;, - `I`e_ 1314Sziil�Sri '- III I I l{ I N I I! Ilillllllll,IIII,NIIII11111 t I!11 i , ,:, II 11 ! IIIiII Connie Brockway, City Clerk o US y0,;7A;;;. City of Huntington Beach �Y =`' �cc, � 3 Office of the City Clerk M i P.O. Box 190 t IA,�„ Huntington Beach, CA 92648 l^L C A H METER 4222:1.1 159 391 05 Central Park#8 INGTpy �Z 505 Park Ave Newport Beach,CA 92662 TEf.; i i ,`Cp�IYTY-�a LEGAL NOTICE — PUBL1G kl_FARIIi T '•'^+x--..,R., ��L A 1- IIIIIIItIIIt IIIIIIIIIIIIIfII11111fIlIlI11II11lIIIIIIIIIIII It II `• I Connie Brockway, City Clerk ;. City of Huntington Beach �. �.'r 6)� , Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 \_ ( H METER 4;72'.*;3T Xx 159 391 48 INGtpy I "� Central Park#12 505 Park Ave Newport Beach,CA 92662 r CaGNT • `,� ! K, EGAL NOTICE — PU&J .HEARI�I(•�s;�, ti sseJk 1��� II111IIIIIIIIIIIIIII(Illill(II�III(IIIIIlIIIIII1111111111lI!(I Connie Brockway, City Clerk oN City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk z 2 Ailn P.O. Box 190 'jul C a S Huntington Beach, CA 92648 fi C�i 92 A H METER 4222P1 XX 'a Vi Ui T47 0 1 25 fS2* 'Ix S14 J, ��NSINGTpy La 4 4W 159-3`91-15 Edwards-Central Park Homeowners A C4 CM 505 Park Ave Balboa Island, CA 92662 N S E N D 'NTI LEGAL No U" UBIG 1-1 N 0 ARINGM. Connie Brockway, City Clerk -,--City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 U Huntington Beach, CA 92648 il 1A 1-*1 1'12 4 22 2.-3 1 XX S .,k I'Vi TV f3 1 25 �NZINGTpCSA 730 El Camino Way#200 33 Tustin,CA 92680 lot E TURN TY LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 4 ;,. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CONNIE BROCKWAY CITY CLERK August 9, 2000 PLC Land Company Mr. Bill Holman 23 Corporate Plaza Drive, Suite 250 Newport Beach CA 92660 Dear Mr. Holman: Enclosed are the July 5, 2000, City Council minutes approved August 7, 2000. There is a correction so please remove from your file the pre-approved set of minutes I mailed to you. (The correction was not on the Appeal of Tentative Tract Map No. 15690.) Sincerely. e:g . W Connie Brockway, CIVIC City Clerk l�•2� � �.a' y�'�'"�; fin. U . (Telephone:714-536-5227) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CONNIE BROCKWAY CITY CLERK July 13, 2000 PLC Land Company C/o Bill Holman 23 Corporate Plaza Drive, Suite 250 Newport Beach CA 92660 Dear Mr. Holman: The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its adjourned regular meeting held Monday, July 5, 2000 took action on the Appeal of Tentative Tract Map No. 15690 and Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14 and upheld the Planning Commission decision of denial. The findings for denial are enclosed. The July 5, 2000 minutes of the denial of the appeal will be mailed to you following Council approval of the minutes. i This is a final decision. You are hereby notified that pursuant to provisions of Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the State of California you have ninety days from July 13, 2000 to apply to the court for judicial review. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact our office at 714/536-5227. Sincerely, Connie Brockway, CIVIC City Clerk Enclosure: Findings for Denial Government Code 1094.6 Cc: City Administrator City Attorney Howard Zelefsky, Planning Director Herb Fauland, Senior Planner Wayne Carvalho,Associate Planner i Gfollowup/appeal/90dayltr (Telephone:714536-5227) (r FINDINGS FOR DENIAL r TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15690/ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 99-14 FINDINGS FOR DENTAL-TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15690: 1. Tentative Tract Map No. 15690 for the grading and subdivision of 2.7 net acres for 10 single- family residences is not consistent with goals and policies of the General Plan. The proposed lot configuration requires grading, including approximately 12,500 cubic yards of import soil,which is not compatible with the existing topography of the surrounding area. The proposed tract will be up to 13 feet higher than the grade of the Weider Regional Park to the west. 2. The site is not physically suitable for the type and density of development without substantially altering the natural topography of the site. The site will require to be raised approximately 13 feet on the west end of the tract in order to accommodate development of two additional units at the end of the cul-de-sac. The modification to the existing variation in grade is not in keeping with the goals and policies of General Plan which encourages development within existing neighborhoods to be compatible with existing structures, including the use of building heights, grade elevations, orientation, and bulk that are compatible with the surrounding development. FI\'DINGS FOR DENIAL- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.99-14: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 99-14-for the development of a 10 unit single family residential subdivision on a site with greater than a three foot differential between the high and low points may be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. The import of approximately 12,500 cubic yards of soil to the site will substantially impact. the aesthetic appearance of the area to and from the site,which may adversely impact the value of properties in the area. The property can be developed with less impact to the existing topography. 2. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan which encourages preserving the natural topography. The proposed soil import and grading of the site will not be compatible with the adjacent topography of the Weider Regional Park. (OOCL328-9) CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE § 1094.6 § 1094.6. Judicial renew; decisions of local'agencies; petition; filing; time; record; decision and Party defined; ordinance or resolution (a) Judicial review of any decision of a local agency,other than school district,as the term local.agency is defined in Section 54951 of the Government Code,or of any commission,board,officer or agent thereof, may be had pursuant to Secdon_1094.5 of this code only if the petition for writ of mandate pursuant to such section is filed within the time limits specified in this section. (b) Any such petition shall be filed not later than the 90th day following the date on which the decision• becomes final. If there is no provision for reconsideration of the decision,or for a written decision or written findings supporting the decision,is any applicable provision of any statute,charter;or rule,for the purposes of this section, the decision is final on the date it is announced. If the decision is not announced at the close of the hearing,the date,time,and place of the announcement of the decision shall be announced at the hearing. If there is a provision for reconsideration,the decision is final for purposes _ -of this section upon the expiration of the period during which 'such reconsideration can be sought; provided, that if reconsideration is sought pursuant to any such provision the decision is final for the purposes of this section on the date that reconsideration is rejected. If there is a provision for a written decision or written findings,the decision is final for purposes of this section upon the date it Is'mailed by first-class mail,postage.prepaid,including a copy of the affidavit or*certificate of mailing,to the party seeking the writ. Subdivision(a)of Section 104 does not apply to extend the time,following deposit in.• the mail of the decision or findings,vdthin which a petition shall be filed. (c) The complete record of the proceedings•shall be prepared by the local agency or its commimon,. board,officer,or agent which made the decision and shall be delivered to the petitioner within 190 days after he has filed a written request therefor. The local agency may recover from the petitioner its'actual costs for transcnbing'or otherwise preparing the record. Such record shall include the transcript.of tlie_ proceedings, all pleadings, all notices and orders, any proposed decision by a hearing officer, the final decision,all admitted exhibits,all rejected exhbits in the possession of the local agency or its comuus.�ion,: board,officer,or agent,all written evidence,and any other papers in the case. (d) If the petitioner files a request for the record as specified in subdivision(c)within lU days after the date the decision becomes final as provided in subdivision(b),the tune within which a petition pursuant to Section 1094.5 may be filed shall be extended to not later than the 30th day following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the petitioner or his attorney of record, fe he has one: (e) As used in this section, decision means a decision subject to review pursuant to Section 1094.5, suspending,demoting,or dismissing an officer or employee,revolting, denying an application for a permit,license,br other entitlement,imposing a civil or administrative penalty, fine,.charX% or cost, or denying an application for any retirement benefit or allowance. (f) In making a final decision as defined in subdivision(e),the local agency shall provide notice-to the party that the time within which judicial review must be sought is governed by this section. As used in this subdivision,"party"means an officer*or employee who has been suspended,demoted or dismissed;•a person whose permit,license,or other entitlement has been revoked or suspended,or whose application for a permit,license,or other entitlement has been denied; or a person whose application for a retirement benefit or allowance has been denied. (g) This section shall prevail over any conflicting provision in any otherMse applicable law relating to- the subject matter, unless the conflicting provision is a state or federal law which provides a.shorter statute of limitations,in which case the shorter statute of limitations shall apply. (Amended by Stets.1983,C.818, § 8; Stats.1991,.c- 1090 (A.B.1484),1 6; Stats.1993, C. 926(AJ3.2205); § 5; Stats.1995,c.898(SX.814),§ 1.) i I PROOF OF SERVICE OF PAPERS STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I am employed in the County of Orange, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action; my business address is 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648. Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.6, on February 27, 2002, 1 served the foregoing documents(s) described as: NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION on the interested parties in this action by placing a true copy thereof in a sealed envelope addressed as follows: PLC Land Company Attn: William Holman 19 Corporate Plaza Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 a. [ ] BY MAIL -- I caused such envelope to be deposited in the mail at Huntington Beach, California. I am "readily familiar"with the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. It is deposited with U.S. Postal Service on that same day in the ordinary course of business, with postage thereon fully prepaid. I am aware that, on motion of a party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than 1 day after date of deposit for mailing in the affidavit. b. [ ] BY MAIL -- By depositing a true copy thereof in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid in the United States mail at Huntington Beach, California, addressed to the address shown above. c. [ ] BY DELIVERY BY HAND to the office of the addressee. d. [X] BY PERSONAL DELIVERY to the person(s) named above. e. [ ] BY FAX TRANSMISSION to No. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on February 27, 2002, at Huntington Beach, California. s e,