Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZoning Text Amendment 12-002 - Park In Lieu Fee - Amends Cha PROOFOF PUBLICATION CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEA(H ' LEGAL NOTICE ORDINANCE NO.3960 Aopted by he Oty STATE OF CALIFORNIA) on O(TOBER 15,2012 - '"AN ORDINANCE OF THE SS CITY OF HUNTINGTON gg���� BEACH AMENDING COUNTY HUNTT IN OF ORANGE ) N 254 OF THE HUNT GTON BEACH ZONING AND SUBDIVI- SION ORDINANCE 'RE- LATING TO PARKLAND I am a citizen of the United States and a SYNOPSIS: CHAPTER 254 ONLY AP- resident of the County of Los Angeles; I PLIES TO RESIDENTIAL e of eighteen ears, and PROJECTS THAT RE- am over the age g y QUIRE TENTATIVE MAPS. IT PREVIOUSLY INCLUD- not a party to or interested in the notice ED A METHODOLOGY THAT RESULTED IN A published. I am a principal clerk of the CITYWIDE STANDARD PER PARK IN LIEU HUNTINGTON BEACH FEE BYIUSNG A CITY- INDEPENDENT; which was adjudged a. RE°LAAVERAGE D�A uEPiv AC- which: CALCULATION. HOWEV- newspaper of general circulation on ER, IN 2002 THE CITY September 29, 1961 , case A6214, and TOENDED REQU IRE SITE- SPECIFIC APPRAISALS June 11, 1963, case A24831, for the TO ENSURE THAT CUR- RENT LAND VALUES ARE City of Huntington Beach, � bounty of UTILIZED WHEN CALCU- LATING PARK IN LIEU Orange, and the State of California. FEES. BY ADOPTING Z 0 N"I N G T E XiT Attached to this Affidavit is a true and AMENDMENT 12-002, CHAPTER 254 ONCE complete copy as was printed and AGAIN INCORPORATES A, CITYWIDE -STANDARD published on the following date(s): PER UNIT PARKIN LIEU FEE COMPARABLE TO p e� e� e� THE FEE APPROVED BY CITY CFO Thursday, October 25, 2012 PROJECTSOUNCIL THAT DO NOT HAVE TENTATIVE MAPS. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council 'of, the City of Huntington certif (or declare) under penaltyBmeeting held, each at a`regular Y \ October 15, 2012 by the followof perjury that the foregoing is true AYES�nSrollhawallHarper, Dwyer, Hansen,Carchio, and correct. Bohr,Boardman. NOES:None ABSTAIN:None ABSENT:None THE FULL TEXT OF THE ORDINANCE IS AVAIL- Executed on November 8, 2012 ABLE IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE. This ordinance is effec- at Los Angeles, California ad Pt•on. days after CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648' Ahz� 714-536-5227 JOAN L.FLYNN,CITY {LERK Published H.B. Indepen- Signature dentl0/25/12 - -- PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) (ITY OF HUNTINGTON BEAN I am a citizen of the United States and a LEGAL NOME resident of the Count of Los Angeles; yAdopted by the(ity(ouncil am over the age of eighteen years, and on O(TOBER 15,2012 "AN ORDINANCE OF THE not a party to or interested in the notice CITY OF HUNTINGTON! BEACH AMENDING published. I am a principal clerk of the CHAPTER 230 OF THE, HUNTINGTON 'BEACH. HUNTINGTON BEACH ZONING AND SUBDIVI- :INDEPENDENT, which was adjudged a �a NGOTo ORDINANCE OF PARK FEE" newspaper of general circulation on SYO NPSIS:G T E X T September 29, 1961, case A6214, and AMENDMENT NO.12-002i INCLUDES DELETING! June 11 , 1963, case A24831, for the SECTION 230.20 OF THE I County BEACHI City of Huntington Beach, County of - ZONING AND SUBDIVI SION ORDINANCE WHICH Orange, and the State of California. PERTAINS TO PARK FEES FOR PROJECTS Attached to this Affidavit is a true and NOT REQUIRING A TEN- TATIVE MAP. complete copy as was printed and PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of published on the following date(s)-. the City of Huntington' Beach at a regular meet- ing held Thursday October 25 2012 October 10 l 201l by the 9 9 following AYES: Shaw, Harper,' Dwyer,,Hansen, Carchio, Bohr,Boardman NOES:None ABSTAIN:None certify (or declare) under penalty ABSENT:None \ pena Y THE FULL TEXT OF THE ORDINANCE IS AVAIL of perjury that the foregoing is true ABLE IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE. and correct. This ordinance is effec-' tive 30 days after adoption. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET HUNTINGTON BEACH, Executed on November 8, 2012 CA92648 714-536-5227 at Los Angeles, California JOANL�LEYYNNN,CITY RK Published H.B. Indepen- dent 10/25/12 Signature City ®f Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street ® Huntington Beach, CA 92648 - - (714) 536-5227 ® www.huntingtonbeachea.gov Office of the City Clerk 17,`t909 t Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk NOTICE OF ACTION October 16, 2012 City of Huntington Beach Planning and Building Department 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Subject: Zoning Text Amendment No. 12-002 (Park In Lieu Fee) Request: ZTA No. 12-002 represents a request by the City pursuant to Chapter 247 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (HBZSO) to amend Chapter 254 (Dedications and Reservations) of the HBZSO by deleting the site- specific-appraisal approach for determining park in lieu fees for residential projects that require tentative maps and replace it with standard citywide fees and incorporate other related changes. The request also includes deletion of Section 230.20 of the HBZSO pertaining to park fees for projects not requiring a tentative map. Location: Citywide On Monday, October 1, 2012 the Huntington Beach City Council conducted a public hearing and by a vote of 7-0 approved Zoning Text Amendment No. 12-002 by approving for introduction Ordinance Nos. 3960 and 3961 and adopting Resolution No. 2012-66 establishing park land dedication fees and other related information. Page 5 of the October 1, 2012 Action Agenda, the Findings for Approval for Zoning Text Amendment No. 12-002, and a copy of City Council Resolution No. 2012-66 are enclosed. Ordinance Nos. 3960 and 3961 become effective November 16, 2012. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact my office at (714) 536-5227. cerely, lJn L.ZInn, CC'MC City Clerk Encl. Page 5— October 1, 2012 Action Agenda ZTA 12-002 Findings for Approval c: Scott Hess, Director of Planning and Building Ricky Ramos, Senior Planner Sister Cities: Anjo, Japan ® Waitakere, New Zealand FINDINGS OF APPROVAL ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 12-002 FINDINGS FOR PROJECTS EXEMPT FROM CEQA: The City Council finds that the project will not have any significant effect on the environment and is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 4501, Class 20, which supplements CEQA because the request is a minor amendment to a zoning ordinance that does not change the development standards intensity or density. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL -ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 12-002: 1. Zoning Text Amendment (ZTA) No. 12-002 to: 1) amend Chapter 254 (Dedications and Reservations) of the HBZSO to delete the site-specific-appraisal approach for determining park in lieu fees for residential projects that require tentative maps and replace it with standard citywide fees and incorporate other related changes; and 2) delete Section 230.20 of the HBZSO pertaining to park fees for projects not requiring a tentative map is consistent with the goals, objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan including: A. Land Use Element Goal LU 2: Ensure that development is adequately served by transportation infrastructure, utility infrastructure, and public services. Obiective LU 14.1: Preserve and acquire open spaces for the City's existing and future residents that provide, maintain, and protect significant environmental resources, recreational opportunities, and visual relief from development. Policy LU 14.1.2. Permit the acquisition and/or dedication of lands for new open space purposes in any land use zone where they complement and are compatible with adjacent land uses and development, contingent on City review and approval. Policy LU 14.1.4: Provide for the acquisition and development of the City's parks in accordance with the Parks and Recreation Element of the General Plan. B. Recreation and Community Services Element Goal RCS 2: Provide adequately sized and located active and passive parklands to meet the recreational needs of existing and future residents, and to preserve natural resources within the City of Huntington Beach and its sphere of influence. Policy RCS 2.1.1: Maintain the current park per capita ratio of 5.0 acres per 1,000 persons, which includes the beach in the calculation. Policy RCS 8.1.5: Update, on a periodic basis, the park in lieu fee assessed to all new development. C. Environmental Resources/Conservation Element Goal ERC 1: Improve and enhance the overall aesthetic value and appearance of the City of Huntington Beach through the provision and maintenance of local public and private open space. The revised ordinance will allow the City to collect park in lieu fees as necessary to acquire and/or improve park and recreational facilities throughout the City to meet the needs of residents consistent with the General Plan and the October 2011 Master Facilities Plan and Development Impact Fee (DIF) Calculation and Nexus Report (Amended April 2012). 2. ZTA No. 12-002 does not affect a general land use provision and compatibility with the uses authorized in, and the standards prescribed for, the zoning district for which it is proposed. ZTA No. 12-002 will revise Chapter 254 and delete Section 230.20 of the HBZSO. It will not affect the zoning of any property or the allowed uses and development standards of any zoning district. 3. A community need is demonstrated for the change proposed. ZTA No. 12-002 will reflect the City's desired approach for determining park in lieu fees for new development consistent with the October 2011 Master Facilities Plan and DI Calculation and Nexus Report (Amended April 2012) and in consideration of maximizing the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan. It will result in equitable standard citywide park fees for rental and for- sale residential units. It will help developers determine development costs earlier in the process. 4. Its adoption will be in conformity with public convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice because ZTA No. 12-002 will allow the city to provide sufficient park and recreational facilities for its residents. Approved for introduction September 24, 2012 Recommended Action: Adopt Ordinance No. 3959, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending Chapter 2.76 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code Relating to Competitive Service Regulations." Approved 7-0 PUBLIC HEARING 7. Approve Zoning Text Amendment No. 12-002 (Park In Lieu Fee) amending Chapter 254 (Dedications and Reservations) and deleting Section 230.20 (Payment of Park Fee) of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (HBZSO) by approving for introduction Ordinance Nos. 3960 and 3961 and adopt Resolution No. 2012-66 establishing park land dedication fees and other related information Planning Commission and Staff Recommended Action A) Approve Zoning Text Amendment No. 12-002 with findings for approval; and, B) Approve for introduction Ordinance No. 3960, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending Chapter 254 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Relating to Parkland Dedication;" and, C) Approve for introduction Ordinance No. 3961, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending Chapter 230 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Relating to Payment of Park Fee;" and, D) Adopt Resolution No. 2012-66, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Establishing Park Land Dedication Fees (Quimby Fees) Pursuant to Ordinance No. 3960 and the Subdivision Map Act." Approved 7-0 COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS (Not Agendized) Shaw, Harper, Dwyer, Hansen, Bohr, Boardman reported. ADJOURNMENT — 7:18 PM The next regularly scheduled meeting is Monday, October 15, 2012, at 4:00 PM in Room B-8, Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. INTERNET ACCESS TO CITY COUNCIL/PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AGENDA AND STAFF REPORT MATERIAL IS LOCATED UNDER THE "GOVERNMENT" TAB AT http://www.huntin_gtonbeachca._gov City Council/PFA Regular Meeting October 1, 2012 Page 5 of 5 DP/c aL. oaJ rJs� °�. was Council/Agency Meeting Held: O / Deferred/Continued to: _&08R1 Zak4g�w__. g Appr ved ❑ Conditionally Approved ❑ Denied R Cit lerk;4 Sign re --tCouncil Meeting Date: October 1, 2012 Department ID Number: PL12-020 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY: Fred A. Wilson, City Manager PREPARED BY: Scott Hess, AICP, Director of Planning and Building SUBJECT: Approve Zoning Text Amendment No. 12-002 (Park In Lieu Fee) amending Chapter 254 (Dedications and Reservations) and deleting Section 230.20 (Payment of Park Fee) of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (HBZSO) by approving for introduction Ordinance Nos. 3960 and 3961 and adopt Resolution No. 2012-66 establishing park land dedication fees and other related information Statement of Issue: Transmitted for your consideration is a request by the City to amend Chapter 254 (Dedications and Reservations) of the HBZSO by deleting the site-specific-appraisal approach for determining park in lieu fees for residential projects that require tentative maps and replace it with standard citywide fees and incorporate other related changes. Also, the request includes deleting Section 230.20 of the HBZSO pertaining to park fees for projects not requiring a tentative map. In addition, a resolution to establish park land dedication fees, average number of persons per dwelling for residential subdivisions, and park land acquisition and development costs per acre used to credit partial park land dedication is also included for Council approval. The Planning Commission and staff recommend approval. Financial Impact: Not applicable. Planning Commission and Staff Recommended Action: Motion to: A) Approve Zoning Text Amendment No. 12-002 with findings for approval (Attachment #1); and, B) Approve for introduction Ordinance No. 3960, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach .Amending Chapter 254 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Relating to Parkland Dedication" (Attachment No. 2); and, Item 7. - I HB -176- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 10/01/2012 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL12-020 C) Approve for introduction Ordinance No. 3961, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending Chapter 230 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Relating to Payment of Park Fee" (Attachment No. 3); and, D) Adopt Resolution No. 2012-66, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Establishing Park Land Dedication Fees (Quimby Fees) Pursuant to Ordinance No. 3960 and the Subdivision Map Act" (Attachment No. 5). Alternative Action(s): The City Council may make the following alternative motions: 1. Deny Zoning Text Amendment No. 12-002 with findings. 2. Continue Zoning Text Amendment No. 12-002 and direct staff accordingly. Analysis: A. PROJECT PROPOSAL Applicant: City of Huntington Beach Location: Citywide Zoning Text Amendment (ZTA) No. 12-002 is a request by the City pursuant to Chapter 247 of the HBZSO to amend Chapter 254 (Dedications and Reservations) of the HBZSO by deleting the site-specific-appraisal approach for determining park in lieu fees for residential projects that require tentative maps and replace it with standard citywide fees and incorporate other related changes. The request also includes deletion of Section 230.20 of the HBZSO pertaining to park fees for projects not requiring a tentative map. In order to facilitate review of ZTA No. 12-002, staff has prepared a legislative draft outlining the proposed amendments (Attachment 4) which include: 1. Deleting Section 230.20 which is now incorporated in Chapter 17.76 of the Municipal Code; 2. Amending Section 254.08(D)(1) to delete reference to appraising land to determine in lieu fee; 3. Amending Sections 254.08(G)(1) and (2) to reflect that park in lieu fees will be based on a fee schedule adopted by City Council instead of the current site-specific- appraisal approach; 4. Deleting Section 254.08(G)(4) regarding payment of an additional 20 percent of the in lieu fee for standard park improvements; 5. Amending Sections 254.08(H)(1) and (2) to reflect that any required partial park land dedication shall be a credit toward the payment of park in lieu fees at the park land acquisition and development cost per acre used to develop the in lieu fee; 6. Amending Section 254.08(I) to: a. Include a land acquisition cost adjustment challenge allowing a developer to object to the park land acquisition cost per acre used to develop the in lieu fee HB -177- Item 7. - 2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 10/01/2012 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL12-020 adopted by City Council and also give the City the ability to increase in lieu fees where the fair market value of land exceeds the park land acquisition cost per acre; b. Update the qualifications of a Qualified Real Estate Appraiser; c. Delete provision for Director determination of fair market value of property for small subdivisions of three or fewer parcels; and 7. Amending Section 254.08(L) to allow payment of in lieu fees prior to final building permit approval instead of at map recordation. 8. Deleting Section 254.08(0)(2) which exempts the subdivision of a 50 foot wide parcel into two lots if held under common ownership for a minimum of five consecutive years. A resolution is also attached to this report for City Council approval to establish park in lieu fees (Attachment No. 5). The standard park in lieu fees included in the resolution were taken from the Development Impact Fee (DIF) Calculation and Nexus Report (Amended April 2012) and reflect 100 percent of the recommended fee. The resolution also identifies average number of persons per dwelling for residential subdivisions as required by the HBZSO. These figures will be used in calculating required park land dedication. Lastly, the resolution also includes park land acquisition and development costs per acre that will be used to credit partial park land dedication. These costs were also derived from the DIF Calculation and Nexus Report. B. BACKGROUND The City Council gave direction to staff to create equal park fees for rental and ownership units. On June 18, 2012, the City Council approved modifications to development impact fees (DIF). The approval included changing park fees for residential developments that do not require a tentative map (typically rental units) from $.86 per square foot to a standard citywide per unit fee. Part of the implementation of the modified DIFs involves the proposed amendments to HBZSO Chapter 254 and deletion of Section 230.20 which is now incorporated in the Municipal Code. Chapter 254 only applies to residential projects that require tentative maps. It previously included a methodology that resulted in a citywide standard per unit park in lieu fee by using a citywide average per acre land value in the calculation. However, in 2002 the City amended Chapter 254 to require site-specific appraisals to ensure that current land values are utilized when calculating park in lieu fees. With ZTA No. 12-002, Chapter 254 will once again incorporate a citywide standard per unit park in lieu fee comparable to the fee approved by City Council for projects that do not have tentative maps. C. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AND RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the request on August 14, 2012, and recommended approval to the City Council. There were no speakers present. Item 7. - 3 HB -178- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ,ACTION MEETING DATE: 10/01/2012 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL12-020 Planning Commission Action on August 14, 2012: The motion made by Delgleize, seconded by Ryan, to approve ZTA No. 12-002 with findings (Attachment No. 1) and forward the draft ordinances (Attachment Nos. 2 and 3) carried by the following vote: AYES: Peterson, Bixby, Delgleize, Mantini, Ryan NOES: None ABSENT: Shier-Burnett ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED D. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION The primary planning issue related to the request pertains to determining the appropriate methodology for calculating park in lieu fees for residential projects that require tentative maps (i.e. site-specific appraisal or standard citywide fees adopted by City Council). The following analysis addresses this issue, the major revisions to the ordinance, and the proposed resolution. Methodology The intent of the proposed amendments to Chapter 254 of the HBZSO is to apply the same standard citywide park in lieu fees for each unit type (detached, attached, and mobile home) whether it is a rental or for-sale unit. This is being accomplished by deleting the current site- specific-appraisal approach in Chapter 254 and replacing it with standard citywide park in lieu fees comparable to those recently approved by City Council for rental units. Approval of ZTA No. 12-002 coupled with City Council's recent actions will result in more equitable standard citywide park fees for both rental and for-sale residential units which is appropriate given that similar unit types generate the same demand for parks regardless of whether a tentative map is proposed or not. Furthermore, compared to a site-specific-appraisal approach, a standard citywide fee will help developers determine development costs earlier in the process. In addition, the current site-specific-appraisal approach has resulted in many developers challenging the City on site-specific appraisals. The revised ordinance will allow the City to collect park in lieu fees as necessary to acquire and/or improve park and recreational facilities throughout the City to meet the needs of residents consistent with the General Plan and the October 2011 Master Facilities Plan and DIF Calculation and Nexus Report (Amended April 2012) and in consideration of maximizing the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan. Standard Improvements The current ordinance includes a provision that in addition to paying the in lieu fee, the subdivider shall also pay an amount equal to 20 percent of the in lieu fee to provide standard improvements such as curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and stop lights among others. This provision was added in 2002 when the park fees were last reviewed and updated. It was added based upon other Orange County cities having similar provisions. However, the HB -1 79- Item 7. - 4 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 10/01/2012 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL12-020 purpose of the fee is more relevant to cities that have a considerable amount of undeveloped land not connected to existing infrastructure. These types of areas are not representative of Huntington Beach and are uncharacteristic of recent park projects that have come about as a result of subdivision projects. Staff is therefore recommending that this provision be deleted. This recommendation was added as a result of further review by staff after the Planning Commission hearing. Credit for Partial Dedication The ZTA incorporates a new method for addressing partial land dedication under Section 254.08(H). Under the current code, if partial dedication is given, a park in lieu fee to be paid by the developer for the balance of the required dedication is calculated using a site-specific appraisal. Since the site-specific-appraisal approach is proposed to be deleted partial dedications are proposed to be given credit toward the payment of in lieu fees at the park land acquisition and development cost per acre used to develop the park in lieu fee. Staff believes that this is an appropriate method for dealing with partial dedications under the new system of standard citywide fees because it incorporates the same cost assumptions used to develop the park in lieu fees. Land Acquisition Cost Adjustment Challenge The ZTA will add a provision in Chapter 254 for land acquisition cost challenge as noted in the DIF Calculation and Nexus Report (Amended April 2012). This provides a process for a developer to object to the park land acquisition cost of $871,200 per acre used to develop the park in lieu fee. The process requires the developer to pay for an appraisal of the property to be developed to determine if the fair market value of the land is less than $871,200 per acre. Conversely, the City retains the ability to increase the in lieu fee in areas where the fair market value of land exceeds $871,200 per acre. Staff believes it is important to include this provision to give developers due process. Timing of Fee Payment The ZTA will allow payment of park in lieu fees prior to final building permit approval as noted in Section 254.08(L) instead of at recordation of the final map. This change is recommended because it is consistent with the Quimby Act and the recently adopted DIFs. It is also appropriate given that the impacts for park facilities will not occur until the final building permit approval and occupancy of the unit. Deletion of Exemption for 50 Foot Wide Parcels The last notable change proposed is the deletion of the exemption from payment of Quimby Fees for subdivision of a 50 foot wide parcel into two lots provided that the parcel has been held under common ownership for a minimum of five consecutive years. This exemption was included when the City amended the code to require site-specific appraisals to protect property owners downtown that want to subdivide their 50 foot wide parcels into two from the significant increase in park fees resulting from the site-specific appraisals. Now that a standard citywide park fee is contemplated, the exemption is no longer needed. Item 7. - 5 HB -1 80- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 10/01/2012 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL12-020 Resolution The proposed resolution is needed because the changes to Chapter 254 specify that the new citywide standard park in lieu fees shall be as adopted by City Council resolution. In addition, Chapter 254 requires that the average number of persons per dwelling unit be established by City Council resolution and derived from the most recent available federal census. The park in lieu fees and average persons per dwelling unit listed in the resolution were derived from the DIF Calculation and Nexus Report (Amended April 2012). Lastly, the resolution incorporates the land acquisition and development cost per acre used in the DIF Calculation and Nexus Report to develop the park in lieu fee and will be used for crediting partial land dedications toward the payment of park in lieu fees. Below are tables comparing current and proposed Quimby fees as well as fee calculations for a sample project. Table A— Comparison of Current and Proposed Quimby Fees Residential Unit Type Current Quimby Fee Proposed Quimby Fee Detached Dwelling Units $17,857 per unit Attached Dwelling Units Based on Land Appraisal $13,385 per unit Mobile Home Dwelling Units $11,169 per unit Commercial N/A N/A Industrial N/A N/A Table B — Quimby Fees for 50 Detached Single Family Units Current Ordinance Proposed Ordinance Per Unit Quimby Fee $20,100 $17,857 Total Quimby Fee $1 ,005,000 $892,850 Calculations: Current Ordinance Required Park Dedication = (50 units x 2.68 residents/unit) x 5 acres/1000 residents = 0.67 acres Quimby Fee = 0.67 acres x $1,500,000/acre appraisal value = $1,005,000 total or $20,100/unit Proposed Ordinance Quimby Fee = 50 units x $17,857/unit = $892,850 E. SUMMARY Staff is recommending approval of Zoning Text Amendment No. 12-002 based upon the following: ■ It will allow the City to collect park in lieu fees as necessary to acquire and/or improve park and recreational facilities throughout the City to meet the needs of residents consistent with the General Plan and the October 2011 Master Facilities Plan and DIF Calculation and Nexus Report (Amended April 2012). ® It will result in equitable standard citywide park fees for rental and for-sale residential units. ■ It will help developers determine development costs earlier in the process. ■ It is consistent with General Plan goals, objectives, and policies. HB -1 s 1- Item 7. - 6 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 10/01/2012 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL12-020 Environmental Status: ZTA No. 12-002 is categorically exempt pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 4501, Class 20, which supplements the California Environmental Quality Act because the request is an amendment to a zoning ordinance that does not change the development standards intensity or density. Strategic Plan Goal: Improve long-term financial sustainability Attachment(s): 1. Suggested Findings for Approval —ZTA No. 12-002 2. Ordinance No. 3960, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending Chapter 254 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Relating to Parkland Dedication" 3. Ordinance No. 3961, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending Chapter 230 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Relating to Payment of Park Fee" 4. Legislative Draft HBZSO Section 230.20 and Chapter 254 5. Resolution No. 2012-66, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Establishing Park Land Dedication Fees (Quimby Fees) Pursuant to Ordinance No. 3960 and the Subdivision Map Act" 6. Planning Commission Staff Report dated August 14, 2012 7. PowerPoint Item 7. - 7 HB -1 82- ATTACHMENT # 1 Fin -183- Item '1. - N ATTACHMENT NO. 1 SUGGESTED FINDINGS OF APPROVAL ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. t2-002 SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR PROJECTS EXEMPT FROM CEQA: The City Council finds that the project will not have any significant effect on the environment and is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 4501, Class 20,which supplements CEQA because the request is a minor amendment to a zoning ordinance that does not change the development standards intensity or density. SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 12-002: 1. Zoning Text Amendment(ZTA)No. 12-002 to: 1) amend Chapter 254 (Dedications and Reservations) of the HBZSO to delete the site-specific-appraisal approach for determining park in lieu fees for residential projects that require tentative maps and replace it with standard citywide fees and incorporate other related changes; and 2) delete Section 230.20 of the HBZSO pertaining to park fees for projects not requiring a tentative map is consistent with the goals, objectives,policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan including: A. Land Use Element Goal LU2: Ensure that development is adequately served by transportation infrastructure, utility infrastructure, and public services. Obiective LU14.1: Preserve and acquire open spaces for the City's existing and future residents that provide,maintain, and protect significant environmental resources, recreational opportunities, and visual relief from development. Policy LU 14.1.2: Permit the acquisition and/or dedication of lands for new open space purposes in any land use zone where they complement and are compatible with adjacent land uses and development, contingent on City review and approval. Policy L U 14.1.4: Provide for the acquisition and development of the City's parks in accordance with the Parks and Recreation Element of the General Plan. R Recreation and Community Services Element Goal RCS 2: Provide adequately sized and located active and passive parklands to meet the recreational needs of existing and fixture residents, and to preserve natural resources within the City of Huntington Beach and its sphere of influence. Policy RCS 2.1.1: Maintain the current park per capita ratio of 5.0 acres per 1,000 persons,which includes the beach in the calculation. ZTA No. 12-002(Park In Lieu Fee) Attachment No. 1.1 Item 7. - 9 HB -184- Policy RCS 8.1.5: Update, on a periodic basis,the park in lieu fee assessed to all new development. C. Environmental Resources/Conservation Element Goal ERC 1: Improve and enhance the overall aesthetic value and appearance of the City of Huntington Beach through the provision and maintenance of local public and private open space. The revised ordinance will allow the City to collect park in lieu fees as necessary to acquire and/or improve park and recreational facilities throughout the City to meet the needs of residents consistent with the General Plan and the October 2011 Master Facilities Plan and Development Impact Fee (DIF) Calculation and Nexus Report(Amended April 2012). 2. ZTA No. 12-002 does not affect a general land use provision and compatibility with the uses authorized in, and the standards prescribed for,the zoning district for which it is proposed. ZTA No. 12-002 will revise Chapter 254 and delete Section 230.20 of the HBZSO. It will not affect the zoning of any property or the allowed uses and development standards of any zoning district. 3. A community need is demonstrated for the change proposed. ZTA No. 12-002 will reflect the City's desired approach for determining park in lieu fees for new development consistent with the October 2011 Master Facilities Plan and DIF Calculation and Nexus Report(Amended April 2012) and in consideration of maximizing the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan. It will result in equitable standard citywide park fees for rental and for-sale residential units. It will help developers determine development costs earlier in the process. 4. Its adoption will be in conformity with public convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice because ZTA No. 12-002 will allow the city to provide sufficient park and recreational facilities for its residents. ZTA No. 12-002(Park In Lieu Fee) Attachment No. 1.2 HB -1 85- Item 7. - 10 ATTACH MENT #2 ORDINANCE NO. 3960 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING CHAPTER 254 OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ZONING AND SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE RELATING TO PARKLAND DEDICATION The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Section 254.08 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance is hereby amended to read as follows: 254.08 Parkland Dedication A. General. This Section is enacted pursuant to the authority granted by the Subdivision Map Act and the general police power of the City including the power to zone and the power to implement open space and recreational elements of the General Plan. This Section is adopted to implement the provisions of the Quimby Act which authorizes the City to require the dedication of land for park and recreational facilities or payment of in-lieu fees incident to and as a condition of the approval of a tentative tract map or tentative parcel map for a residential subdivision. The park and recreational facilities for which dedication of land and/or payment of an in-lieu fee as required by this Section are in accordance with the policies, principles and standards for park, open space and recreational facilities contained in the General Plan. (3562-7/02) The general purposes and objectives of this Section are: (3562-7/02) 1. To preserve, enhance and improve the quality of the physical environment of the City of Huntington Beach; (3562-7/02) 2. To provide a procedure for the acquisition, development and rehabilitation of local park and recreational facilities; (3562-7/02) 3. To secure for the citizens of Huntington Beach the social and physical advantages resulting from the provision of orderly park, recreation and open space facilities; (3562-7/02) 4. To establish conditions which will allow park and recreational facilities to be provided and to exist in harmony with surrounding and neighborhood land uses; (3562-7/02) 5. To ensure that adequate park and recreational facilities will be provided; (3562-7/02) 6. To provide regulations requiring five usable acres, or the proportionate share thereof, having a grade not exceeding two percent, for each 1,000 persons residing within the City to be supplied by persons proposing residential subdivisions. (3562-7/02) B. Requirements. The requirements of this Section shall be complied with by the dedication of land, payment of a fee in lieu thereof, or both, at the option of the 12-3261/82885 1 Ordinance No. 3960 City, for park or recreational purposes at the time and according to the standards and formula contained in this Section. The amount and location of land dedicated or the fees to be paid, or both, shall be used for acquiring, developing new or rehabilitating existing community and neighborhood parks and other types of recreational facilities in such a manner that the locations of such parks and recreational facilities bear a reasonable relationship to the use of the park and recreational facilities by the future inhabitants of the subdivision generating such dedication or fees, or both. Dedications for trails shall not be included as part of any requirements for park or recreational dedication. (3562-7/02) Lands to be dedicated or reserved for park and/or recreational purposes shall be suitable in the opinion of the Director and the Director of Community Services in location, topography, environmental characteristics and development potential as related to the intended use. The primary intent of this Section shall be construed to provide the land for passive and active recreation, including but not limited to: tot lots, play lots, playgrounds, neighborhood parks, playfields, community or regional parks, lakes,picnic areas, tree groves or urban forests, and other specialized recreational facilities that may serve residents of the City. Principal consideration shall be given therefore to lands that offer: (3562-7/02) 1. A variety of recreational potential for all age groups; 2. Recreational opportunities provided and maintained in a manner that will permit the maximum use and enjoyment by residents of the City of Huntington Beach; (3562-7/02) 3. Possibility for expansion or connection with school grounds; 4. Integration with hiking, riding and bicycle trails, natural stream reserves and other open space; 5. Coordination with all other park systems; 6. Access to at least one existing or proposed public street. C. General Standard. It is hereby found and determined that the public interest, convenience, health, safety and welfare require that five acres of property for each 1,000 persons residing within the City be devoted to local park and recreational purposes. D. Standards and Formula for Dedication of Land. Where a park or recreational facility has been designated in the General Plan and is to be located in whole or in part within the proposed subdivision and is reasonably related to serving the present and future needs of the residents of the subdivision, the subdivider shall dedicate land for park and recreation facilities sufficient in size and topography to meet that purpose. The amount of land to be provided shall be determined pursuant to the following standards and formula: A= 5.0 (DF x No. DU) 1000 12-3261/82885 2 Ordinance No. 3960 1. Definitions of terms: a. A-the area in acres required to be dedicated as a park site. b. DF - density factor as determined pursuant to Section 254.08 (E). (3562-7/02) C. 5.0 -number of acres per one thousand persons. d. No. DU - number of dwelling units proposed in the subdivision. 2. When a proposed subdivision contains dwelling units with different density factors, the formula shall be used for each such density factor and the results shall be totaled. 3. Dedication of parkland shall not be required for parcel maps or subdivisions containing 50 parcels or less; except that when a condominium project, stock cooperative or community apartment project exceeds 50 dwelling units, dedication of land may be required notwithstanding that the number of parcels may be less than 50. (3562-7/02) E. Densi . The amount of land dedicated or fees paid shall be based upon residential density, which is determined on the basis of the approved tentative map and the average number of persons per household. The average number of persons per household by unit in a structure shall be established by City Council resolution and be derived from the most recent available federal census or state or City population and housing data. (3562-7/02) The number of dwelling units in a subdivision shall be the number proposed for construction. When the actual number of units to be constructed is unknown, it shall be assumed for the purposes of this chapter that the maximum number permissible by law will be constructed. F. Standard Improvements. The dedication of land for park and recreational purposes shall not be deemed to waive any other requirements that may be imposed by the City. The subdivider may, at the time of the approval of the tentative map, be obligated by condition to said map to provide curbs, gutters, sidewalk, drainage facilities, street lighting, stop lights, street signs, matching pavement and street trees to full City standards, to stub-in requested standard improvements required for residential property plus initial on-site grading required for developing the park facility. In lieu of making said improvements and upon approval of the Planning Commission or City Council, whichever acts last on the tentative map, the subdivider may pay a sum as estimated by the Director of Public Works sufficient to cover the cost of said improvements. The environmental condition of any land dedicated pursuant to this Section shall satisfy all federal, state and local requirements applicable to parkland and recreational facilities. (3562-7/02) G. Fees in Lieu of Land Dedication. (3562-7/02) 1. General. Whenever the requirements of this Section are met solely on the basis of the payment of a fee in lieu of land dedication, the subdivider shall 12-3261/82885 3 Ordinance No. 3960 pay a fee in lieu of dedication according to a schedule adopted by City Council resolution. 2. Fees in Lieu of Land - 50 Parcels or Less. If the proposed subdivision contains 50 parcels or less and has no park or recreational facility, the subdivider shall pay a fee according to a schedule adopted by City Council resolution. When a condominium project, stock cooperative or community apartment project exceeds 50 dwelling units, dedication of land may be required notwithstanding that the number of parcels may be less than 50. 3. Use of Fees. The fees paid to the City pursuant to this Section and the interest accrued from such fees shall be used, in accordance with the schedule developed pursuant to Section 254.08(M), for the purpose of acquiring, developing new or rehabilitating existing neighborhood or community park or recreational facilities reasonably related to serving the subdivision, including the purchase of necessary land and/or improvement of such land for park or recreational purposes. All fees collected pursuant to this Section shall be transferred for deposit into a separate fund and used solely for the purposes specified in this Section. All monies deposited into the fund shall be held separate and apart from other City funds. All interest or other earnings on the unexpended balance in the fund shall be credited to the fund. The money deposited in the fund account shall be committed to the partial or full completion of necessary purchases or improvements within five years after payment thereof or the issuance of building permits on one-half of the lots created by the subdivision, whichever occurs later. If the money is not committed, it shall be distributed and paid to the then record owners of the subdivision in the same proportion that the size of each lot bears to the total area of all lots in the subdivision. Any requests for refunds shall be submitted to the Director in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 254.08 (P). (3562-7/02) H. Criteria for Requiring Both Dedication and Fee. If the proposed subdivision contains more than 50 lots, the subdivider shall both dedicate land and pay a fee in lieu of dedication in accordance with the following: (3562-7/02) 1. When only a portion of the land to be subdivided is proposed in the General Plan as the site for a local park or recreational facility, such portion shall be dedicated for local park purposes and shall be a credit toward the payment of in lieu fees at the park land acquisition and development cost per acre used to develop the in lieu fee. 2. When a major part of the local park or recreational site has already been acquired by the City and only a small portion of land is needed from the subdivision to complete the site, such portion shall be dedicated, and shall be a credit toward the payment of in lieu fees at the park land acquisition and development cost per acre used to develop the in lieu fee. 3. The fee shall be used for the improvement of the existing park or recreational facility or for the improvement of other neighborhood or community parks and recreational facilities reasonably related to serving the subdivision. I. Amount of Fee in Lieu of Park Land Dedication. Where a fee is required to be paid in lieu of park land dedication, such fee shall be according to a schedule adopted by City Council resolution. 12-3261/82885 4 Ordinance No. 3960 Land Acquisition Cost Adjustment Challenge. If the subdivider objects to the parkland acquisition cost per acre used to develop the in lieu fee pursuant to a schedule adopted by City Council resolution, the subdivider may, as outlined below, pay for an appraisal of the property to be developed to see if the fair market value of the land is less than the park land acquisition cost per acre. Conversely the City retains the ability to increase the in lieu fee in areas where the fair market value of land exceeds the park land acquisition cost per acre. Fair market value of the land shall be determined by a qualified real estate appraiser who currently holds the MAI designation from the Appraisal Institute and has been selected and retained by the City at the expense of the subdivider ("Qualified Real Estate Appraiser"). The fair market value of the land shall be based on the average acre value of the property to be subdivided at the time of the recording of the final subdivision map, adjusted to reflect the value of such acre of property rough graded to a maximum two percent slope. Such appraisal shall exclude improvement. The date of value of the property for purposes of the appraisal shall be within 60 days of payment of the fee as referenced in Section 254.08L. (3468-8/00,3562-7/02,3827-4/09,3879-6/10) If the subdivider objects to the fair market value as determined by the Qualified Real Estate Appraiser, the subdivider may request an appeal by a hearing officer within ten (10) days. The hearing officer provided for this appeal process shall be from a list provided by the Director or one selected by the mutual consent of the parties. The subdivider shall have the burden of proof in contesting the fair market value appraisal. All decisions rendered by the hearing officer shall be final for all purposes, and binding upon the parties. If the subdivider does not request an appeal within ten (10) days, the original decision shall stand, be final for all purposes, and binding upon the parties. If the deadline falls on a weekend or a holiday, the deadline extends to the next succeeding working day. J. Determination of Land or Fee. Whether the City accepts land dedication, or elects to require the payment of a fee in lieu of, or a combination of both, shall be determined by the Director after consideration of the following: (3562-7/02) 1. Policies, standards and principles for park and recreational facilities in the General Plan; (3562-7/02) 2. Topography, geology, access and location of land in the subdivision available for dedication; 3. Size and shape of the subdivision and land available for dedication; 4. Feasibility of dedication; 5. Compatibility of dedication with the General Plan; 6. Availability of previously acquired park property. The determination by the City as to whether land shall be dedicated, or whether a fee shall be charged, or a combination of both, shall be final and conclusive. K. Credit for Improvements and Private Open Space. If the subdivider provides park and recreational improvements to the dedicated land other than those referenced in Section 254.08 (F), the value of the improvements together with 12-3261/82885 5 Ordinance No.3960 any equipment located thereon shall be a credit toward the payment of fees or dedication of land required by this Section. (3562-7/02) Common interest developments as defined in Sections 1351 of the California Civil Code shall receive partial credit, not to exceed 50 percent, against the amount of land required to be dedicated, or the amount of the fee imposed, pursuant to this Section, for the value of private open space within the development, which is usable for active recreational uses, if the City Council, on the recommendation of the Community Services Commission, finds that it is in the public interest to do so, and that the following standards are met. (3562-7/02) 1. That yards, court areas, setbacks and other open areas required by Titles 20-24 (Zoning) shall not be included in the computation of the private open space; 2. That the private ownership and maintenance of the open space is adequately provided for by recorded written agreement, conveyance, or restrictions; 3. That the use of the private open space is restricted to park and recreational purposes by recorded covenant, which runs with the land in favor of the future owners of property, and which cannot be defeated or eliminated without the consent of the City or its successor; 4. That the proposed private open space is reasonably adaptable for use for park and recreational purposes, taking into consideration such factors as size, shape,topography, geology, access, and location; and 5. That facilities proposed for the open space are in substantial accord with the provisions of the General Plan. L. Procedure. 1. As determined by the City pursuant to this Section,the subdivider shall: a. Dedicate the land at the time of the recording of the final map or parcel map, and/or; b. Pay the fees prior to final building permit approval. 2. Open space covenants for private park or recreational facilities shall be submitted to the City prior to approval of the final map or parcel map and, if approved, shall be recorded concurrently with the final map or parcel map. M. Schedule of Use. At the time of the approval of the final map or parcel map, the City shall make a preliminary determination of how, when, and where it will use the land or fees, or both, to develop or rehabilitate park or recreational facilities to serve the residents of the subdivision. Final scheduling of improvements to these new or rehabilitated parks or recreational facilities shall be made as part of the City's capital improvement program. (3562-7/02) N. Not Applicable to Certain Subdivisions. The provisions of this Section do not apply to: (1) commercial or industrial subdivisions; or (2) to condominium projects or stock cooperatives that consist of the subdivision of airspace in an 12-3261/82885 6 Ordinance No. 3960 existing apartment building which is more than five years old when no new dwelling units are added. (3562-7/02) O. Exemptions. The following development shall be exempt from the payment of fees pursuant to this Section: (3562-7/02) Development of real property into housing units that are either rented, leased, sold, conveyed or otherwise transferred, at a rental price or purchase price which does not exceed the "affordable housing cost" as defined in Section 50052.5 of the California Health and Safety Code when provided to a"lower income household" as defined in Section 50079.5 of the California Health and Safety Code or "very low income household" as defined in Section 50105 of the California Health and Safety Code, and provided that the applicant executes an agreement, in the form of a deed restriction, second trust deed, or other legally binding and enforceable document acceptable to the City Attorney and binding on the owner and any successor-in-interest to the real property being developed, guaranteeing that all of the units developed on the real property shall be maintained for lower and very low income households whether as units for rent or for sale or transfer, for the lesser of a period of thirty years or the actual life or existence of the structure, including any addition, renovation or remodeling thereto. (3562-7/02) Exemptions shall only be granted when the following findings can be made: (Resolution No.2004-80-9/04) i. The project meets the minimum on-site private and common open space requirements; or (Resolution No.2004-80-9/04) ii. The exemption will not individually or cumulatively result in adverse impacts to public recreational opportunities in the coastal zone; and (Resolution No.2004-80-9/04) iii. The exemption will not individually or cumulatively lead to overcrowding or overuse of public facilities by the public in any single area in the coastal zone. (Resolution No.2004-80-9/04) P. Appeals. Any person may appeal a determination of the City regarding the interpretation and implementation of this Section. Any such appeal shall be filed with the Director consistent with the requirements of Section 248.24 of the Huntington Beach City Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. (3562-7/02) Q. Refunds. Requests for refunds of in-lieu fees paid pursuant to this Section may be directed to the Director at any time. The Director may approve of a refund or a partial refund of park fees paid or release of security instruments when the following has been verified: (3562-7/02) 12-3261/82885 7 Ordinance No. 3960 1. That the refund amount requested corresponds to the amount of fees actually deposited in the fund account established pursuant to Section 254.08 (G) (3) for a given number of dwelling units; and (3562-7/02) 2. That the local park requirement for the dwelling units in question had been met by actual Council acceptance of park land, or by an irrevocable recorded offer to dedicate a park land on a final tract map or parcel map; or (3562-7/02) 3. The subdivision or building permit approval for which fees were required has been withdrawn or is otherwise no longer valid. (3562-7/02) SECTION 2. All other provisions of Chapter 254 not amended by this ordinance remain in full force and effect. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall become effective 30 days after its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 15 t h day of October 2012. Mayor ATTEST: INITIA AND AP ROVED: Llftvd 15�(jj.94� City Clerk Director of Building and Planning REVIE ND APPROVED: APPROVED AS TO FORM- ptylmt.ager � City Attorney 12-3261/82885 8 Ord. No. 3960 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, JOAN L. FLYNN, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing ordinance was read to said City Council at a Regular meeting thereof held on October 01, 2012, and was again read to said City Council at a Regular meeting thereof held on October 15, 2012, and was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council. AYES: Shaw, Harper, Dwyer, Hansen, Carchio, Bohr, Boardman NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None I,Joan L.Flynn,CITY CLERK of the City of Huntington Beach and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council,do hereby certify that a synopsis of this ordinance has been published in the Huntington Beach Fountain Valley Independent on October 25,2012. In accordance with the City Charter of said City A.M Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk Ci Clerk and ex-officio rk Senior Deputy City Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California ATTACHMENT #3 ORDINANCE NO. 3961 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING CHAPTER 230 OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ZONING AND SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE PAYMENT OF PARK FEE The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Chapter 230 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance is hereby amended to delete section 230.20-Payment of Park Fee in its entirety. SECTION 2. This ordinance shall become effective 30 days after its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 15th day of October , 20 12 Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk V City ttorney REVI ND APPROVED: INITI T A DAP ROVED: Pt'l�nager Director of Planning and Building 12-3442/282948 1 Ord. No. 3961 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, JOAN L. FLYNN,the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing ordinance was read to said City Council at a Regular meeting thereof held on October 01,2012, and was again read to said City Council at a Regular meeting thereof held on October 15,2012, and was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council. AYES: Shaw, Harper, Dwyer, Hansen, Carchio, Bohr, Boardman NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None I,Joan L.Flynn,CITY CLERK of the City of Huntington Beach and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council,do hereby certify that a synopsis of this ordinance has been published in the Huntington Beach Fountain Valley Independent on October 25,2012. In accordance with the City Charter of said City °k Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk C' Clerk and ex-officio Verk Senior Deputy City Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California ATTACHMENT #4 KEY INSERTIONS: Double underline DELETIONS «.'ks" ORDINANCE N0,3961 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 230.20 Payment of Park Fe exeept fef mebi4e heine pafks, shall pay a park fee. The fees sM!l be paid aad oa4eidated def6F the payment of GeFtaiR DevelgpFneRt Impart Fees-, ,')_1442/82947 Item 7. - 23 Hs -198- KEY INSERTIONS: Underlined DELETIONS St4k04feugPt ORIDNANCE NO. 3940 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT CHAPTER 254 DEDICATIONS AND RESERVATIONS 254.08 Parkland Dedication A. General. This Section is enacted pursuant to the authority granted by the Subdivision Map Act and the general police power of the City including the power to zone and the power to implement open space and recreational elements of the General Plan. This Section is adopted to implement the provisions of the Quimby Act which authorizes the City to require the dedication of land for park and recreational facilities or payment of in-lieu fees incident to and as a condition of the approval of a tentative tract map or tentative parcel map for a residential subdivision. The park and recreational facilities for which dedication of land and/or payment of an in-lieu fee as required by this Section are in accordance with the policies,principles and standards for park, open space and recreational facilities contained in the General Plan. (3562-7102) The general purposes and objectives of this Section are: (3562-7/02) 1. To preserve, enhance and improve the quality of the physical environment of the City of Huntington Beach; (3562-7/02) 2. To provide a procedure for the acquisition, development and rehabilitation of local park and recreational facilities; (3562-7/02) 3. To secure for the citizens of Huntington Beach the social and physical advantages resulting from the provision of orderly park, recreation and open space facilities; (3562-7/02) 4. To establish conditions which will allow park and recreational facilities to be provided and to exist in harmony with surrounding and neighborhood land uses; (3562-7102) 5. To ensure that adequate park and recreational facilities will be provided; (3562-7/02) b. To provide regulations requiring five usable acres, or the proportionate share thereof,having a grade not exceeding two percent, for each 1,000 persons residing within the City to be supplied by persons proposing residential subdivisions. (3562-7/02) B. Requirements. The requirements of this Section shall be complied with by the dedication of land,payment of a fee in lieu thereof, or both.,at the option of the City, for park or recreational purposes at the time and according to the standards and formula contained in this Section. The amount and location of land dedicated or the fees to be paid,or both, shall be used for acquiring, developing new or rehabilitating existing community and neighborhood parks and other types of recreational facilities in such a manner that the locations of such parks and recreational facilities bear a reasonable 1 12-3261/82886 HB -199- Item 7. - 24 KEY INSERTIONS: Underlined DELETIONS relationship to the use of the park and recreational facilities by the future inhabitants of the subdivision generating such dedication or fees,or both. Dedications for trails shall not be included as part of any requirements for park or recreational dedication. (3562-7/02) Lands to be dedicated or reserved for park and/or recreational purposes shall be suitable in the opinion of the Director and the Director of Community Services in location, topography, environmental characteristics and development potential as related to the intended use. The primary intent of this Section shall be construed to provide the land for passive and active recreation, including but not limited to: tot lots,play lots, playgrounds,neighborhood parks, playfields, community or regional parks, lakes, picnic areas,tree groves or urban forests, and other specialized recreational facilities that may serve residents of the City. Principal consideration shall be given therefore to lands that offer: (3562-7102) 1. A variety of recreational potential for all age groups; 2. Recreational opportunities provided and maintained in a manner that will permit the maximum use and enjoyment by residents of the City of Huntington Beach; (3562-7/02) 3. Possibility for expansion or connection with school grounds; 4. Integration with hiking, riding and bicycle trails,natural stream reserves and other open space; 5. Coordination with all other park systems; 6. Access to at least one existing or proposed public street. C. General Standard. It is hereby found and determined that the public interest, convenience,health, safety and welfare require that five acres of property for each 1,000 persons residing within the City be devoted to local park and recreational purposes. D. Standards and Formula for Dedication of Land. Where a park or recreational facility has been designated in the General Plan and is to be located in whole or in part within the proposed subdivision and is reasonably related to serving the present and future needs of the residents of the subdivision, the subdivider shall dedicate land for park and recreation facilities sufficient in size and topography to meet that purpose. The amount of land to be provided shall be determined pursuant to the following standards and formula: A= 5.0 (DF x No. DUB 1000 1. Definitions of terms: a. A -the area in acres required to be dedicated as a park site of te-be YY a w p4i,'A.lAV11L ivi the suvdv-ruva[. T3662-7-102j 2 Item 7. - 2561182886 HB -200- KEY INSERTIONS: Underlined DELETIONS &+4ketkough b. DF - density factor as determined pursuant to Section 254.08 (E). (3562-7102) C. 5.0 -number of acres per one thousand persons. d. No. DU - number of dwelling units proposed in the subdivision. 2. When a proposed subdivision contains dwelling units with different density factors, the formula shall be used for each such density factor and the results shall be totaled. 3. Dedication of parkland shall not be required for parcel reaps or subdivisions containing 50 parcels or less; except that when a condominium project, stock cooperative or community apartment project exceeds 50 dwelling units, dedication of land may be required notwithstanding that the number of parcels may be less than 50. (3562-7/02) E. Density. The amount of land dedicated or fees paid shall be based upon residential density, which is determined on the basis of the approved tentative map and the average number of persons per household. The average number of persons per household by unit in a structure shall be established by City Council resolution and be derived from the most recent available federal census or state or City population and housing data. (3562-7/02) The number of dwelling units in a subdivision shall be the number proposed for construction. When the actual number of units to be constructed is unknown, it shall be assumed for the purposes of this chapter that the maximum number permissible by law will be constructed. F. Standard Improvements. The dedication of land for park and recreational purposes shall not be deemed to waive any other requirements that may be imposed by the City. The subdivider may, at the time of the approval of the tentative map,be obligated by condition to said map to provide curbs,gutters, sidewalk,drainage facilities, street lighting, stop lights, street signs,matching pavement and street trees to full City standards,to stub-in requested standard improvements required for residential property plus initial on-site grading required for developing the park facility. In lieu of making said improvements and upon approval of the Planning Commission or City Council, whichever acts last on the tentative map,the subdivider may pay a sum as estimated by the Director of Public Works sufficient to cover the cost of said improvements. The environmental condition of any land dedicated pursuant to this Section shall satisfy all federal, state and local requirements applicable to parkland and recreational facilities. (3562-7102) G. Fefmula&T-Fees in Lieu of Land Dedication. (3562-7)02) 1. General. Whenever the requirements of this Section are met solely on the basis of the payment of a fee in lieu of land dedication,the subdivider shall pay a fee in lieu of dedication e W to 4he ^,, e e f the land pr-e efiboa for-'' "ieakien 3 12-3261/828N HB -201- Item 7. - 26 KEY INSERTIONS: Underlined DELETIONS &tF&�,�nemRmi,„ 9ee on 25 4 . (3 2- "M2) 2. Fees in Lieu of Land - 50 Parcels or Less. if the proposed subdivision contains 50 parcels or less and has no park or recreational facility,the subdivider shall pay a fee according to a schedule adopted by City Council resolutJQn,eqiW to the la a - .,1 ..esidepits of the pr-epesed z,s ..« ..,,pr-eseribed in See-fien ` J uraa,a in uu emnnnt deteffflined in VVK,lLi!-LYe YY1411+l, thePfevisionsof Cooetie . 254.08(1). When a condominium project, stock cooperative or community apartment project exceeds 50 dwelling units, dedication of land may be required notwithstanding that the number of parcels may be less than 50. (3662-W02) 3. Use of Fees. The fees paid to the City pursuant to this Section and the interest accrued from such fees shall be used, in accordance with the schedule developed pursuant to Section 254.08(Nl), for the purpose of acquiring, developing new or rehabilitating existing neighborhood or community park or recreational facilities reasonably related to serving the subdivision, including the purchase of necessary land and/or improvement of such land for park or recreational purposes. All fees collected pursuant to this Section shall be transferred for deposit into a separate fund and used solely for the purposes specified in this Section. All monies deposited into the fund shall be held separate and apart from other City funds. All interest or other earnings on the unexpended balance in the fund shall be credited to the fund. The money deposited in the fund account shall be committed to the partial or full completion of necessary purchases or improvements within five years after payment thereof or the issuance of building permits on one-half of the lots created by the subdivision,whichever occurs later. if the money is not committed, it shall be distributed and paid to the then record owners of the subdivision in the same proportion that the size of each lot bears to the total area of all lots in the subdivision. Any requests for refunds shall be submitted to the Director in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 254.08 (P). (3562-7/02) et+s. When+1, r-equ + f this + eiaaren+L+ i i the basis ef the parnent of a fee in lieu of land dedieafien, in addition te the in lie fee, pay VqHL4L 4V LV p\.1tt1lL ef the in He'd fee dfaifiage 7 , stfeet lighting, step , , street signs i ff+ hi an s4e s to full f ity sta ff i ,] stubbing F ����-', E,pavement Ki-�l�L V 41 V V L trees V J L V City JL , H. Criteria for Requiring Both Dedication and Fee. If the proposed subdivision contains more than 50 lots,the subdivider shall both dedicate land and pay a fee in lieu of dedication in accordance with the following: (3562-7102) 1. When only a portion of the land to be subdivided is proposed in the General Plan as the site for a local park or recreational facility, such portion shall be dedicated for local park purposes and shall be a credit toward the payment of in lieu fees at the park land acquisition and development cost per acre used to develop the in lieu fee a fee eemputed r r V„J Vl �.J fSLe VL1+;Vl1 254.08(4) nl, 11 b id feT additional land that R ,l.a have been !a be + .7 C� ti required ��dLLL�.0� Y ++ 2 "3662- } 4 Item 7. - 2731/$2W6 HB -202- KEY INSERTIONS: Underlined DELETIONS St4ket4augli 2. When a major part of the local park or recreational site has already been acquired by the City and only a small portion of land is needed from the subdivision to complete the site, such portion shall be dedicated, and a fee, £e shall be a credit toward the payment of in lieu fees at the jar land acquisition and development cost per acre used to develop the in lieu fee. in an ameuRt equal te the vabae ef the land whieh weuld other-wise have bee (3562 7-re2) 3. The fee shall be used for the improvement of the existing park or recreational facility or for the improvement of other neighborhood or community parks and recreational facilities reasonably related to serving the subdivision. I. Amount of Fee in Lieu of Park Land Dedication. Where a fee is required to be paid in lieu of park land dedication, such fee shall be according to a sche—dule adouted by City Council resolution. Land Acquisition Cost Adjustment Challenge. If the subdivider objects to the park land acquisition cost per acre used to develop the in lieu fee pursuant to a schedule _adopted by City Council resolution,the subdivider may, as outlined below, pay for an appraisal of the property to be developed to see if the fair market value of the land is less than the park land acquisition cost per acre. .Conversely the City retains the ability to increase the in lieu fee in areas where the fair market value of land exceeds the ark Land acquisitionsp3-t-Per acre. Fair market value of the land shall be determined by a qualified real estate appraiser who currently holds the MAI designation from the Appraisal Institute dmt; nd has been selected and retained by the City at the expense of the subdivider the ^-neriean Institute of Real E_.-* to "ppnt secs("Qualified Real Estate Appraiser"). The fair market value of the land shall be based on the average acre value of the property to be subdivided at the time of the recording of the final subdivision map, adjusted to reflect the value of such acre of property rough graded to a maximum two percent slope. Such appraisal shall exclude improvement. The date of value of the property for purposes of the appraisal shall be within 60 days of payment of the fee as referenced in Section 254.08L. (3468-8100,3562-7/02,3827-4109,3879-5110) , If the subdivider objects to the fair market value as determined by the Qualified Real Estate Appraiser, the subdivider may request an appeal by a hearing officer wi in ten (10)days. The hearing officer provided for this anneal process shall be from a list provided by the Director or one selected by the mutual consent of the parties The subdivider shall have the burden of proof in contesting the fair market value appraisal. All decisions rendered by the hearing officer shall be final for all purooses_and binding _upon the parties If the subdivider does not request an appeal within ten(10) days, the original decision shall stand be final for all purposes, and binding upon the Parties. If the deadline falls on a weekend or a holiday the deadline extends to the next succeeding working_day., , A-ppmiser-to eemplete a seeend appraisal. If the City disptAes the fair-market value as 12-3261/82886 HB -203- Item 7. - 28 KEY INSERTIONS: Underlined DELETIONS Cf :L ,0" at the expense of the s4divider.. (35627492,39274 xa�o crni defeF the payment of GeFtain Development Impaot Fees. Subdivisions Censisfine of Tbn-ee or-Fewer Par-eels. if the pfepesed subdivisi eeflsidefu4iefi of site ehafaetefisfies of the if the subdMder-ebjeets to the d��tien-e�hc�ete e-subdivider- e#ain, eA his or-herevffi-expease,-a Qualified Reel Esta o A,, ^1 b +t,^ $5 nnn nn the fb +t7 s---------=-------- -=rr�------ - =rrM--- =.ii more -----=s=--• � "��rvvcu &4 tieas shall be as the valt�e.- ' '4empewily deie.then not ni ne.+..in Deyelee..nena I...annnk Fees J. Determination of Land or Fee. 'Whether the City accepts land dedication, or elects to require the payment of a fee in lieu of, or a combination of both, shall be determined by the Director after consideration of the following: (3562a102) 1. Policies, standards and principles for park and recreational facilities in.the General Plan; (3562-7/02) 2. Topography, geology, access and location of land in the subdivision available for dedication; 3. Size and shape of the subdivision and land available for dedication; 4. Feasibility of dedication; 5. Compatibility of dedication with the General Plan; b. Availability of previously acquired park property. The determination by the City as to whether land shall be dedicated, or whether a fee shall be charged,or a combination of both, shall be final and conclusive. K. Credit for Improvements and Private Open Space. If the subdivider provides park and recreational improvements to the dedicated land other than those referenced in Section 254.08 (F),the value of the improvements together with any equipment located thereon shall be a credit toward the payment of fees or dedication of land required by this Section. (3562-7102) Common interest developments as defined in Sections 1351 of the California Civil Code shall receive partial credit,not to exceed 50 percent, against the amount of land required to be dedicated, or the amount of the fee imposed,pursuant to this Section, for the value of private open space within the development, which is usable for active recreational uses, if the City Council, on the recommendation of the Community 6 Item 7. - 2961/82886 xB -204- KEY INSERTIONS: Underlined DELETIONS &`'4eth -..g Services Commission,finds that it is in the public interest to do so, and that the following standards are met. (3562-7102) 1. That yards, court areas, setbacks and other open areas required by Titles 20-24 (Zoning) shall not be included in the computation of the private open space; 2. That the private ownership and maintenance of the open space is adequately provided for by recorded written agreement, conveyance, or restrictions; 3. That the use of the private open space is restricted to park and recreational purposes by recorded covenant,which runs with the land in favor of the future owners of property, and which cannot be defeated or eliminated without the consent of the City or its successor; 4. That the proposed private open space is reasonably adaptable for use for park and recreational purposes,taking into consideration such factors as size, shape, topography, geology, access, and location; and 5. That facilities proposed for the open space are in substantial accord with the provisions of the General Plan. L. Procedure. (3562-7/02) 1. As determined by the City pursuant to this Section.the subdivider shall: a. Dedicate the land Aat the time of the recording of the final map or parcel map, and/or; :aQ Apt b......__Pay the fees prior to final building permit approval. —de-6-ned by the City 2. Open space covenants for private park or recreational facilities shall be submitted to the City prior to approval of the final map or parcel map and,if approved, shall be recorded concurrently with the final map or parcel map. M. Schedule of Use. At the time of the approval of the final map or parcel map, the City shall make a preliminary determination of how,when,and where it will use the land or fees, or both,to develop or rehabilitate park or recreational facilities to serve the residents of the subdivision. Final scheduling of improvements to these new or rehabilitated parks or recreational facilities shall be made as part of the City's capital improvement program. (3562-7/02) N. Not Applicable to Certain Subdivisions. The provisions of this Section do not apply to: (1) commercial or industrial subdivisions; or(2)to condominium projects or stock cooperatives that consist of the subdivision of airspace in an existing apartment building which is more than five years old when no new dwelling units are added. (3562-7/02) O. Exemptions. The following development shall be exempt from the payment of fees pursuant to this Section: (3562-7/02) 7 12-3261/82886 1413 -205- Item 7. - 30 KEY INSERTIONS: Underlined DELETIONS S•^u gh j 47_ Development of real property into housing units that are either rented, leased, sold, conveyed or otherwise transferred, at a rental price or purchase price which does not exceed the"affordable housing cost" as defined in Section 50052.5 of the California Health and Safety Code when provided to a"lower income household" as defined in Section 50079.5 of the California Health and Safety Code or"very low income household"as defined in Section 50105 of the California Health and Safety Code, and provided that the applicant executes an agreement, in the form of a deed restriction, second trust deed, or other legally binding and enforceable document acceptable to the City Attorney and binding on the owner and any successor-in-interest to the real property being developed,guaranteeing that all of the units developed on the real property shall be maintained for lower and very low income households whether as units for rent or for sale or transfer, for the lesser of a period of thirty years or the actual life or existence of the structure, including any addition, renovation or remodeling thereto. (3562-7102) 2. Subdivisieft ef a 50 feet wide par-eel into twe lets pr-&,Aded 4hat the pafeel has been held undef-eeffmien evffieFship fef a mi-niaium ef five eeaseetAive years. 3-. Exemptions shall only be granted when the following findings can be made: (Resolution No.2004-80-9/04) i. The project meets the minimum on-site private and common open space requirements; or (Resolution No.2004-80-9/04) ii. The exemption will not individually or cumulatively result in adverse imp.acts to public recreational opportunities in the coastal zone; and (Resolution No.2004-80-9/04) iii. The exemption will not individually or cumulatively lead to overcrowding or overuse of public facilities by the public in any single area in the coastal zone. (Resolution No. 2004-80-9/04) P. Appeals. Any person may appeal a determination of the City regarding the interpretation and implementation of this Section. Any such appeal shall be filed with the Director consistent with the requirements of Section 248.24 of the Huntington Beach City Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. (3562-7r02) Q. Refunds. Requests for refunds of in-lieu fees paid pursuant to this Section may be directed to the Director at any time. The Director may approve of a refund or a partial refund of park fees paid or release of security instruments when the following has been verified: (3562.7/02) 1. That the refund amount requested corresponds to the amount of fees actually deposited in the fluid account established pursuant to Section 254.08 (G) (3) for a given number of dwelling units; and (3562-7/02) 2. That the local park requirement for the dwelling units in question had been met by actual Council acceptance of park land, or by an irrevocable recorded offer to dedicate a park land on a final tract map or parcel map; or (3562-7/02) 3. The subdivision or building permit approval for which fees were required has been withdrawn or is otherwise no longer valid. (3562-7/02) 8 Item 7. - 3161162886 HB -206- ATTACHMENT #5 EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 14, 2012 RESOLUTION NO. 2012-66 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ESTABLISHING PARK LAND DEDICATION FEES (QUIMBY FEES) PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NUMBER 3960 AND THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT WHEREAS, the California Government Code contains specific enabling legislation for the acquisition and development of community and neighborhood parks by a City; and This legislation, codified as Section 66477 of the Government Code and known commonly as the "Quimby Act," establishes criteria for charging new development for park facilities based on specific park standards. The Quimby Act allows the City to require the dedication of land or the payment of fees or combination thereof(Quimby Fees) to help mitigate the impacts of property improvements; and The City has adopted amended Ordinance No. 3960 which enables the City to charge development based on the Quimby Act maximum standard of 5.0 acres per 1,000 persons. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 3960 the amount and location of land to be dedicated or the fees to be paid bear a reasonable relationship to the use of the park by the future inhabitants of the subdivision. In addition, the Ordinance provides that the legislative body has adopted a general plan containing a recreational element, and the park and recreational facilities are in accordance with definite principles and standards contained therein. The ordinance specifies how, when, and where it will use the land or fees, or both, to develop park or recreational facilities and that the fees collected under the ordinance shall be committed within five years after the payment of such fees; and The City retained Revenue & Cost Specialists, LLC to recalculate some of the City's existing Development Impact Fees as well as Quimby Fees in light of future development's impacts on City's existing and future parks systems. The recalculated Quimby Fees are contained in the Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report (Nexus Report) Chapter 8 and the accompanying Master Facilities Plan attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference; and The Nexus report provides that the park acquisition and development cost for residential subdivisions consists of$871,200 per acre for land acquisition, $508,644 per acre for park land development (improvements) and $77,780 per acre for community center space acquisition. Based on the total of these costs, the report recommends that the City charge new development for the maximum allowable amount of park acreage as allowed in the Quimby Act, which equates to a park land in-lieu fee of$6,130.01 per new resident. The cost methodology is further identified in Chapter 8 of the Nexus report attached hereto; and The City Council finds that Resolution No. 2012-66 is necessary for the changing needs and orderly development of the community, is necessary to accomplish refinement of the General Plan, and is consistent with other elements of the General Plan, 12-3445/83691.docx 1 Resolution No. 2012-66 NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby resolve as follows: 1. Residential Quimby Fees and Average Number of Persons Per Dwelling. The Park Land In-Lieu fee and average number of persons per dwelling for new residential subdivisions shall be set as follows: _- � -- �$�j� � _'_ ,E -�'` RYA _C � • £'O .4,F �'� max- e v a)r en � �Y f5y •� � s� ��� ��,{Yt Y�eJ 'U211� � Detached Dwelling Units 2.913 J $6,130.01 $17,857 Attached Dwelling Units 2.257 $6,130.01 $13,385 Mobile Home Dwelling Units 1.822 11 $6,130.01 $11,169 This fee shall not apply to parcels on which residential development is prohibited or to commercial or industrial subdivisions where no residential parcels are established. 2. Park Land Acquisition And Development Cost Per Acre. Where only partial park land dedication is provided such partial dedication shall be credited towards the payment of in lieu fees at a rate of$871,200 per acre for land acquisition and $508,644 per acre of park development (improvements). 3. Severability. If any section, phrase, sentence, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portions shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision; and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. 4. Effective Date. This Resolution shall go in effect concurrently with Ordinance No. 3960 12-3445/83691.doex 2 Resolution No. 2012-66 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 1 ,;t day of tnhpr r4 12. Mayor REVIE D APPROVED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: NY �71 City a r C ty Attorbey M v_ a INITIAT XD PROVED: Direct of P ammng and Building Attachments: Nexus Report Chapter 8 Master Facilities Plan 12-3445/83691.docx 3 Exhibit"A" -Resolution No.2012-66 Exhibit A xB -2111- Item 7. - 36 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Development Impact.lee Calculation and Nexus .Deport for the City of Huntington Beach, CalYfornra October, 2011 (Amended Apri127,2012) Copyright,2009, 2010&2011 by Revenue& Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Ali rights reserved No part of this work covered by the copyright herwn may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means—graphic, electramc, merhanical, including any photocopying,recording, taping or tapmg or information starage and retrieval systems without cavritten permission al: Revenue& Cost Specialists, L.L.C. 1519 East Chapman Avenge, Suite C FUHe<rt0n, CA 92931 (714)992-9020 Item 7. - 37 xB -212- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Chapter 8 Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development (including Open Space) This Chapter summarizes the City's existing inventory of parks and identifies the ratio of park land (and park facilities improvements) per resident allowable under the Quimby Act (§66477 of the Government Code) for residential developments involving the subdivision of land and AB1600 (§66000) for the construction of residential developments not involving the subdivision of land. The existing per capita standard is theca utilized to calculate the park dedication requirement for future residential development. EXISUNG PARKS AND PARK IMPROVEMENTS SYSTEM Open space notwithstanding, intensive parks and recreational facilities constitute one of the City of City of Huntington Beach's greatest needs both with respect to facilities for current residents and future citizens. The provision of a well-planned park system, with a variation in the size and nature of facilities offered, is an important amenity to residents of any city, the City of City of Huntington Beach included. A mixture of passive and active uses and facilities and programs which appeal to a broad spectrum of potential park and trail users are considered optimal in most urban.cities. The City currently has at its disposal(and within general control)some 999.09 acres of park, beach and specialty uses for use by the City's many residents. However, not all of these acres are owned by the City, many are leased or owned by other agencies made available to the City via a joint use agreements with the various school districts or are S.C.E_ right-of-way. The current acres dedicated to park use (and owned or under long-term control by the City) can reasonably well serve the City's current needs. However if the number of owned park acres remains static at 778.41 acres, the City may not be able to continue to meet recreational demands in light the probable 9.0% increase in the City's population. At an attempt to achieve a high level of fairness, the City's owned park acreage will be used as the standard for calculating the park standard and the development impact fee schedule. The figure is a Government Code statute-based calculation and thus does not include other park opportunities in the area such as Harriet Weider Regional Park, which while clearly serving the City residents, are not City-facilities and thus cannot be programmed by the City_ The City has a General Plan standard target of 5.0 acres per 1,000 acres per residents and the calculation of target does include the park acres of other agencies (i.e. the regional park and state-owned beach land) within the calculation of that General Plan Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 89 HB -213- Item 7. - 38 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Chapter 8 Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development target. That is completely acceptable for General Plan issues, and the City does meet that General Plan standard. Future residential development, by increasing the City's population, will impact the City's park system by requiring additional athletic fields, adequate space for various athletic activities and community center. space. Given the magnitude of growth projected in this and other reports,the challenge facing the City will be to provide new facilities and park land to serve the recreational needs of these new residents. Without additional park land acquisition and development of currently owned but underutilized park land during the remaining period of private residential development, the City's parks will become overcrowded and overused, with the ultimate result becoming a negative experience for park users. lExisting Park Land and n Space Land. Currently, the City owns 4or has long-tern control of) approximately 778.41 acres of traditional park land, about 87.9%(683.9 acres)of it, developed. The entire list of parks and their acreage is identified on Schedule 8.1 at the conclusion of this Chapter with a summary by type in Table 8-1. Central Park is the largest developed park, representing just under a half of the park system acreage and provides the greatest variety of sports and passive uses. Table 8-1 Current Park Total Inventory Neighborhood Parks 183.79 129.74 Community/ orts Parks 546.82 470.81 Other (beaches, etc) 268.48 177.86 Total Acres (Owned) 999.09 778.41 City Park Standard. Table 8-2, following, is a comparison of the acreage of parks to the City of Huntington Beach's current population and indicates that the City presently possesses a total standard of 5.248 acres of park land per 1,000 residents,(999.09 park acres :- [190,377 resident's 1,0001, rounded). However as stated previously, the owned acreage will be used to calculate the standard and resulting impact fee. The City presently owns 778.41 acres and thus possesses an owned standard of 4.089 acres of owned park land per 1,000 residents, (778.41 owned park acre's [190,377 resident's - 1,000], rounded). This is above the benchmark of 3.0 acres per Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development In;pact Fee Calculation Report 90 Item 7. - 39 HB -214- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Chapter 8 Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development 1,000 persons contained in Section 66477 of the California Government Code relating to dedication of parks. Table 8-2 Calculation of Actual City-owned and Developed Park Acres Standard K�MgM i W M Current Park Acres 999.09 778-41 Current City Population 190,377 190,377 Population Stated in Thousands 190.377 190.377 Park Acres per 1,000 Population 5.248 4.0891 The Quimby Act, to be discussed later, allows a minimum standard of 3.0 acres per thousand resident's even if the City has not attained that standard. However,the park acres owned standard for the City of Huntington Beach, at 4.089 acres per 1,000 resident's, exceeds that minimum standard and thus the Quimby allowable minimum standard of 3.0 acres per 1,000 new residents is irrelevant and the 4.089 acres/1,000 resident's standard will be used for Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development. 'Though not particularly relevant to the City of Huntington Beach, the Quimby Art has a cap on land dedications required as a part of the subdivision of laud of 5.0 acres per thousand (Government Code §66447 (a)(2). Planned Improvements. In addition to the ongoing improvement of the remaining 115.85 acres' available for increased residential development, the City will need to acquire 70.5 additional park acres, per Table 8-3, and develop these new parks to serve the additional 17,089 residents anticipated to live in City of Huntington Beach at General Plan build-out. [This space left vacant to place the following table on a single page] Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 91 HB -215- Item 7. - 40 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Chapter 8 Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Table 8-3 Calculation of Required Park Acres per Allowable Standard Future Added Population 17,089 Population Stated in Thousands 17.089 Allowable ity of Huntington Beach Park Standard 4.128 Parks Acres Required to Maintain Standard 70.5 The 70.5 acres could be constructed in any of the following configurations: Mini or "Pocket"Parks-This type is the smallest of the park type designations,usually an acre or less. Mini parks are generally not planned due to higher maintenance costs. They are usually the result of the acquisition of an unusual parcel oftentimes with historical or community significance. Tarbox, Booster, Trinidad or Baily Parks are good examples of this category. Local or Neighborhood Parks-These parks are generally 3,0 to six acres and serve local(walk- in distance)users. Not surprisingly, the City has a number of these parks, roughly forty-nine at an average of about 3.5 acres in size. Neighborhood Parks, per the category title, are intended to serve walk-in populations nearby the park and typically are not highly programmed with.City-run activities. Community - These parks, to be functional, are usually closer to ten acres or larger and are designed to meet the needs of the entire community. These needs include youth and adult sports organizations, clubs or associations and large scale community events such as 4ffi of July celebrations or festivals. Langenbeck, Baca, Bartlett, Carr and Gisler Parks are good examples of a broad-based use community park. Sport Parks- These park., again as titled, are highly infrastructure-developed to meet the active sports needs of both youth and adults. Edison and Greer Parks are good examples of the City's sports parks. The proposed park improvements that could be contained within the roughly 65 needed acres and the existing standard(Table 8-2)are consistent with the City's Park and Recreation Element of the General PIan. The City's 3.785 acres per 1,000 population standard speaks reasonably well for the City as a three-acre per 1,000 population standard is the common rninixmm, but frequently Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 92 Item 7. - 41 HB -216- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 G'hanter 8 Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development unmet,target ofmunicipalities and recreation and park special districts throughout California. City staff has plans and has identified parcels that would assist help reach the 5.0 acres per 1,000 standard at General Plan build-out. CALCULATION Or, PARK DEDICATION STANDARD Unlike the other facilities discussed in this Report, the California Government Code contains specific enabling legislation for the acquisition and development of community and neighborhood parks by a City. This legislation, codified as Section 66477 of the Government Code and known commonly as the "Quimby Act," establishes criteria for charging new development for park facilities based on specific park standards. This Report will recommend the adoption of Quimby- style park fees over an AB 1600-style development impact fee for developments requiring the subdivision of land and an AB 1600 fee for non subdivided land. Allowable Park Standard As stated earlier, under Section 66477 of the Government Code, the City may charge new residential development based on a standard of 3.0 acres per 1,000 population if the City does not presently possess a ratio of 3.0 acres per 1,000 for the existing population. The Government Code also enables a city to charge development based on a standard higher than 3.0 acres (to a maximum of 5.0 acres) if the City currently exceeds the minimum benchmark ratio of 3.0 acres per 1,000 persons. Schedule 8.1 indicates that the City exceeds that minimum standard (with 3.785 acres/1,000 residents) and may then impose a fee in order to maintain that standard. The law states that "if the amount of existing neighborhood and community park area ... exceeds the [3 acres of park area per 1,000 person] limit ... the legislative body may adopt the calculated amount as a higher standard not to exceed 5 acres per 1,000 persons.i4 Park fees may be required by the City provided that the City meets certain conditions including: 0 The amount and location of land to be dedicated or the fees to be paid shall bear a reasonable relationship to the use of the park by the future inhabitants of the subdivision. O The legislative body has adopted a general plan containing a recreational element,and the park and recreational facilities are in accordance with definite principles and standards contained therein. 0 The city ... shall develop a schedule specifying how, when, and where it will use the land or fees, or both, to develop park or recreational facilities ... Any fees collected under the ordinance shall be committed within five years after the payment of such fees. Once a per capita standard for parks is determined, the cost of residential development's impact on the City's park system can then be computed as follows: Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 93 H B -217- Item 7. - 42 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Chapter 8 Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Park-land Acquisition Costs. Land costs will vary significantly from one park to another. The park land to be acquired must be suitable for park construction and is somewhat conservatively estimated at approximately$871,200 per acre(or$20.00/square foot)which has been used in the park development impact fee calculation, as a d&yltpark development jMct fee for ordinary residential dwelling development. This is consistent with the cost of recent development for detached dwelling development in the more northerly areas of the City of Huntington Beach area. However,the use of this$20.00 per square foot figure could be criticized if a developer can show that the cost of the residential land they are developing is currently valued at less than the $871,200/acre figure. Conversely the City should retain the ability to increase this impact fee in areas where the cost of land exceeds the$20.00 per square foot figure. The fee recommendation at the end of the Chapter will recognize this need for flexibility. Park Development Costs. Park development costs are based upon the very recent construction of Schedule 8.3,a current schedule of common park costs and typical improvements by type of park. Schedule 8.2 identifies the three types parks`that the City will likely construct over General Plan build-out6 and the costs of the types and numbers of improvements generally included in each of the following and are summarized from Schedule 8.2, identifies the factors in the average costs to develop an acre of park land for the three types,based on figures which are consistent with the probable improvements and costs to build similar parks incurred by other communities. For cost estimate purposes, roughly forty-five acres of Central Park has been identified as higher cost sports park acres with the remainder as Community Park. Sixty acres of beach land has been categorized as neighborhood park due to the nature of the more limited improvement costs. The table also indicates the three major types of parks. The existing 834.06 developed park acres'cost the City an estimated $258,698,242 construct as parks for an average construction cost of $310,168 per acre. Table 8-4 Average Park Construction Cost per Acre - .. T.YP Parkos : w, - - ?ra of <'--Acres:?' ; :: Acre:...:-::'_Coisttictan: Park Cost. Neighborhood/Mini Park 271.01 $223,441 $60,559,816 Commu44X Park 229.15 $289,296 $66,292,242 Sports/Regional Park 333.90 $394,884 $131,851,622 Total Cost $258,698,242 Total Acres 834.06 - = :"- 834.06 Cost/Acre rounded -_=_ - ===-__- $310 168 Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 94 Item 7. - 43 H B -218- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Cho tp er S Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities DeveLopnzent The $310,168/acre is then increased by 15% to $356,693 to account for the park architectural costs and 24% to $442,299/acre to account for project administration, plan check, engineering, inspection and materials testing costs. Lastly,the$422,299 per acre figure is increased by 15% to $508,644 for a typical park project contingency. Schedule 8.2 shows this in numeric detail. Schedule 8.3 details the average park construction cost by type of park. The Existing Park Cornnaunity Centex Inventory.' The City has a number of facilities dedicated for use as public uses facilities (as opposed to staff facilities). The existing 118,020 square feet of Community Use Facilities are identified in Table 8-5, following. Table 8-5 Inventory of Existing Park Community Use Facilities _Carnrnuxuty C7se Facile uat`e Feet Beach Public Service Center 2,561 City Crymnasium and Pool Facility 23,600 Edison Community Center 11,065 Harbor View Clubhouse 27203 Huntington Beach Municipal Art Center 11,092 Huntington Beach Youth Shelter 5,600 Junior Lifeguard Headquarters 5,922 Lake Parr Clubhouse 3,000 Lake View Clubhouse 2,000 LeBard Clubhouse 1,000 Mundy Community Center 11,000 Newland Barn 6,000 Newland House Museum 2,750 Oak View Community Center 10,000 Rodgers Senior Center 14,000 Seniors Outreach Center 2,700 Shipley Nature Center Interpretive Building 1,863 Terry Park Community Center I,6b4 Total Community Use Facilities Square Feet 118,020 Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 95 HB -219- Item 7. - 44 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Chapter 8 Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development The City has 118,020 public use community center square feet as identified in Table 8-5 previous. When divided by the City's 849.58 acres of developed park land the result indicates an average of 138.92 square feet of community center per acre of developed park. At the development cost of$490.00 per square foot of community center,there is a cost of$66,680 for the 138.92 average square feet of public uses facilities per acre of existing developed park (138.92 square feet multiplied by the$480 per square foot of community center construction). The$66,680 represents the fixture cost of maintaining the existing square feet of community center per acre of park, and as a result, per capita. Average Park Acquisition and Development Cost per Capita. The combiners park acquisition and development cost is $1,446,524 per acre ($871,200/acre for acquisition, $508,644 per acre for development and $77,780 for community center space acquisition). If the City were to charge development for the maximum allowable amount of park acreage as allowed in the Quimby Act and as recommended here, then the City would need to acquire 4.128 acres of new park land for every potential 1,000 new residents to the City. The 4,128 acres of land acquisition and park and community center improvements per 1,000 persons would be$6,130,008 or about 6,130.01 per new resident. Table 8-6 and Schedule 8.1 calculates the cost,per type of residential dwelling,to develop 4.089 acres, which represents the required park land cast for 1,000 persons. Table 8-6 Summary of Quimby Park/AB1600 Development Impact Fees for Residential Dwelling Construction c t Detached Dwellin Units 2.913 $6,130.01 $17,857 Attached Dwelling Units 2.257 $6,130.01 $13,385 Mobile Home Dwellin Units 1.822 $6,130.01 $11,169 The development impact fees for residential detached dwelling development involving the subdivision of land, as identified in Table 8-6, should be adopted under the auspices of the Quimby Act. The development impact fees for residential dwelling units not requiring the subdivision of a parcel, will need to be adopted as an AB 1600-supported development impact fee. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 96 Item 7. - 45 I-113 -220- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Chapter 8 Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development QQpen Space Fees for Business Uses. Imagine a community without any (or very little) park or open space. There a small number of such communities in the greater Los Angeles area. All private development benefits from the acquisition of land that is never developed, and exists, at a minimum, as a buffer from all other businesses. Schedule 8.4 identifies the cost for park land (as open space) for the business type land-uses. Again, the City owns 778A acres of park space which at a minimum acts as open space for all land uses. There are 10,271.8 acres of privately held developed land within the City's limits. Asa result there is 0.0758 acres of park/open space for each developed privately held acre. The 0.0758 acres of open space per privately held acre is the recommended standard to be applied to the development of vacant parcels zoned for the business uses of commercial and resort lodging, commercialloffice and industrial/manufacturing uses. The open space land acquisition cost will be limited to 25% of the$20.00 per square foot (or $871,200 per acre) acquisition cost based upon the prernise that business use benefits largely from the open space component and but does not require the benefits of developed parks and that open space land acquisition costs are less than land appropriate for parks.The cost to acquire that +0.0578 acre of park land would be $16,605. Again the cost is limited to only open space land acquisition,but does not include the development component of that land as a park, That will fall to the developers of residentially zoned land that will generate park users (residents). Business acres benefit from the parks as open areas that make the City a desirable location for that business. The $300,000 per acre of development will be divided by the varying units from the three differing types of business uses in Table 8-7. Schedule 8.5 is summarized in Table 8-7 following. Table 8-7 Cost Calculation for Business Uses LEE - �R �.I1and�5 �(► lli _ 41 .- _.tom-�-�• Commercial Lodging Unit _ 36 $16,505 $458 Resort Lodging Unit 46 $16,505 $359 Commercial/Office S uare Feet 17,300 $16,505 $0.954 Industrial Square Feet 21,394 $16,505 $0.772 Note:A lodging unit is defined as keyed room. Land Acquisition Cost Adjustme #Challenge. As mentioned previously,the use of$871,200/acre as the default park land acquisition cost is based upon the assumption that parks acreage would likely be close in proximity and thus similar in cost to residential land value of the private project the park is intended to serve. However, if the developer or contractor of a home can provide i I Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 97 HB -221- Item 7. - 46 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Chapter 8 Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development evidence(acceptable to the City), in the form of a recent purchase agreement or appraisal of the property they will be developing that the current land value is worth less than the$871,2001acre (or a$20,001square foot), the development impact fee could be adjusted accordingly by placing the actual cost of land acquisition into the Schedule 8.1 calculation. Again, if the City wishes to adopt such an adjustment, the terms under which the challenge may be made and proved should be included in the Development Impact Fee Ordinance. Similarly, if a development is closer to the beach area and land costs are higher,the City should be able to impose a park development impact fee consistent with the local land acquisition. costs. Schedule 8.1 shows this calculation. RECAP OF RECOM TENDED PARK LAND ACQUISITION AND PARK FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES. 0 Schedule 8.1 contains the maximum Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fees to be imposed upon residential development based upon the facts presented in this Chapter for default or standard residential developments. * Schedule-8.4 contains the maximum Park/Open Space Land Acquisition Impact Fees to be imposed upon business development based upon the facts presented in this Chapter. CHAPTER ENDNOTES L Adoption of a Quimby Act fee requires a Park"plan". 2. The figure has relevance for municipalities that have large tracts of land available for subdivisions in the thousands or more. 3.The Quimby Act does allow use of revenues raised by the adoption of a Quimby Act Park Impact Fee to be used for rehabilitation of existing parks. 4. California Government Code, Title 7, Division 2, Section 66477(b). 5. Totaling the roughly 64.7 acres of park land acquisition and development that could be expected to be financed by imposing the proposed development impact fees over General Plan build-out. 6, Mini parks are not included in the mix as they are very costly to construct on a per acre cost and generally are expensive maintenance factors. Mini parks are rarely planned for but generally occur as a result of a land donation or as the recognition of a historical site. 7.Based upon the 1,006,58 acres of parkland available, less the 45.01 acre Weider County Regional Park and the 127.51 un-improved park acres of City Parks. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee G21culation Report 98 Item 7. - 47 xB -222- Exhibit"A" -Resolution No.2012-66 Schedule 8.1 City of Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Park Quimby Fee for Dwellings on a Sub-divided Parcel,and; ABI 600 Fee for Dwelling on Non-subdivided Parcels 13a fit R"T r ad Lake Park 4.75 000 4.75 Lake View Park 2.16 2.1$ 2.16 Lamb Park 2,60 2.60 0.00 Lambert Park 3.50 3.50 3.60 LangenbeGk Park 17.02 9.24 17.02 Lark View Park 3.66 0.00 3.65 LeBard Park 4.99 8,01 4,99 Manning Park 2.46 2.46 2.46 Marina Park 9.34 9.34 9.34 Marine View Park 2.96 0.00 2.96 McGallen Park 5.84 5.84 5.84 Meadowlark Golf Course 98,00 98.00 98-00 Moffett Park 2.38 2.38 2.38 Murdy Park 16.04 16.04 16.04 Newland Park 2,94 2.94 2.94 : Oak View Center Park 1.31 0.00 1.31 Weider Regional(County-owned) 45.01 0.00 23.01 Pattinson Park 3.51 3.51 3.61 Perry Park 1.88 1.88 1.88 Pleasant View Park 2.17 0.00 2.17 Prince Park 0.22 0.22 0.22 Robinwood Park 1.41 0.00 1,41 Rodgers Senior Center Site 2.01 2.01 2.01 Schroeder Park 2.37 0.00 2.37 Seabridge Park 3.91 3.91 3.91 Seeley Park 3.37-- 3.37 3.3 Sowers Park 2.65 2.65 2.65 Sun View Park 2.45 0.00 2.45 Talbert Park 5.44 6.44 5.44 Tarbox Park 0.44 0.44 0.44 jenPark C81 4.81 4.81 Triangle Park 1.11 1.11 1.11 Trinidad Park 0.75 0.76 0.75 Wardlow Park 8.36 8.36 8-36 Wieder Paf k 4.80 4,80 4180 Worthy Community Park 7.00 7.00 7.00] Total Acres(Owned/Developed) 999.09 778.41 849.58 Current Population 190,377 190,377 190,377 PopulatiW1,000 190.38 190.38 190.38 Current Standard 5,248 4.089 4.463 99 Revenue&Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, 92831 CA HB -223- Item 7. - 48 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Schedule 8.1 City of Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Park Quimby Fee for Dwellings on a Sub-divided Parcel,and; ABI 600 Fee for Dwelling an Non-subdivided Parcels 7-Acres/1,000 Population Standard 9.24fl 1 4.089 46633 5mo 4-089� Quimby Maximum Allowable .4633 Acquisition Cost per Acre(1) $871,200 Construction Cost per Acre(2) $508,644 Community Center Construction $66,680 Total Component Cost $871,200 5=75,372 4 Cost X Standard $3,562 37377 $2,567,671 Population Served by Standard .... ....... 1,606.6 Cost per Resident $6,130.01 Detached Dwelling Units 2.913 1 $10,377 $7,480 $17,857 Attached Dwelling Units 2.257 $8,040 $5,795 $13,835 Mobile Home Dwelling Units 1.822 $6,491 $4,678 1 $11,169 1. Current estimate of$20.00 per acre acquisition cost for land consistent with park use. 2. See Schedule 9.3 for typical park amenity construction cost details. 100 Revenue&Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, 92831 CA Item 7. - 49 HB -224- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Schedule 8.2 City of Huntington Beach Park Site Inventory Improvement Cost Residential Park Development Impact Fee Calculation of Average Park Acre Construction Cost zo:. Prince Park 0.22 $223,441 $49,157 French Park 0.33 $223,441 $73,736 Tarbox Park 0.44 $223,441 $98,314 Daumort Beach 0.46 $223,441 $102,783 Hurnboft Beach Park 0.48 $223,441 $107,252 City Gyrn]Pool Site 0.50 $22-3,441 $111,721 Finley Park 0.56 $223,441 $125,127 Bailey Park 0.59 $223,441 $131,830 Trinidad Park 0.75 $223,441 $167,681 Booster Park 0.85 $223,441 $189,925 Triangle Park IM $223,441 $248,020 BanningfMagnolia Park 0.00 $223,441 $0 Oak View Center Park 1.31 $223,441 $292,708 Robinwood Park 1.41 $22:3,441 $315,052 Frankiin Park- 1.52 $223,441 $339,631 Perry Park 1.88 $223,441 $420,070 Rodgers Senior Center Site 2.01 $223,441 $449,117 Helme Park 2.02 $223,441 $451,361 Bauer Park 2.04 $223,441 $455,820 Lake View Park 2.16 $223,441 $482,633 Pleasant View Park 2A7 $223,441 $484,868 Drew Park T 2-8 $223,441 $509,446 Circle View Park 2.31 $223,441 $516,149 Schroeder Park 2.37 $223,441 $529,556 Bushard Park 2.38 $223,441 $531,790 Moffett Park 2-38 $223,441 $531.790 Sun View Park 2.45 $223,441 $547,431 Manning Park 2.46 $223,441 $54%665 Burke Park 2.50 $223,441 $558,603 Arevelos Park 2.56 $223,441 $576,478 Lamb Park 0.00 $223,441 $0 Sowers Park 2.65 $228,441 $592,119 Eader Park 2,68 $223,441 $598,823 Hawes Park Z68 $223,441 $598,823 Bolsa View Park 2.70 $223,441 $603,291 College View Park 2.70 $223,441 $603,291 Conrad Park 2.71 $223,441 $605,526 Clegg-Stacey Park 2,80 $223,441 $625,636 Golden View Park 2.81 $223,441 $627,870 Newland Park 2.94 $223,441 $656..917 Haven View Park 2.95 $223,441 $659,152 Marine View Park 2.96 $223,441 $661,386 Glen View Park 3.02 $223,441 $674,7012 Seeley Park 3,37 $223,441 $752,9 Lambert Park 3.50 $223,441 $782,044 Revenue&Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, 92831 CA HB -225- Item 7. - 50 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Schedule 8.2 City of Huntington Beach Park Site Inventory Improvement Cost Residential Park Development Impact Fee Calculation of Average Park Acre Construction Cost Z- M Pattinson Park 3. ;1 $223,441 $764,279 Farquhar Park 3.52 $223,441 $786,513 Hope View Park 3.61 $223,441 $806,62.3 Lark View Park 3.66 $223,441 $815,561 Seabridge Park 3.91 $223,441 $873,655 Harbour View Park 4.02 $223,441 $898.234 Green Park 4.04 $223,441 $902,703 Lake Park 4.75 $223,441 $1,061,346 Wieder Park 4. $223,441 $1,072,518 �Terry Park 4.81 $223,441 $1,074,752 Le Bard Park 4.99 $223,441 $1,114,972 Talbert Park 5.44 $223,441 $1,215,520 McCallen Park 5.84 $223.441 $1,304,897 Discovery Well Park 6.60 $223,441 $1,474,71 2 Gibbs Park 6.83 $223,441 $1,526,104 Wardlow Park 8.36 $223,441 $1,867,969 Marina Park 9.34 $223.441 $2,086,941 Meadowlark Golf Course 98,00 $223,441 $21,897,243 Carr Park 10.72 $289,296 $3,101,256 Irby Park 2.91 $289,296 U41,852 �Gisler Park 11.67 $269,296 $3,376,088 �Baca Park 14.35 $289,296 $4,151,402 Langenbeck Park 17,02 1 $289,296 $4,923,823 Bluff Top Park 19-66 $289,296 $5,687,565 Bartlett Park 2.00 $289,296 $578,593 Beach, City-leased 90.62 -$2-89,296 $26,216,029 Beach, City-owned 60.20 $289.296 $17,415,636 Worthy Park 7.00 $394.884 $2.764,186 Greer park 10.44 $394,884 ---,Z-,122,584 Murdy Park 16.04 $394,884 $6,333,932 1 Eclison Park 47.1 $394,884 $18,630,607 Huntington central Park 253.24 $394,684 $100,0G0,314 Total 834.06 $258,698,680 Total Park Acres 834.06 Average Construction Cost/Acre $310,168 Community Input, Design, Engineering 115.00% Sub-total Park Construction Cost $356,693 Project Administation, Soils-<Materials Testing, etc. 124.00% Sub-total Park Construction Cost $442,299 Contingency 115-00% Total Park Construction Cost $508,644 102 Revenue&Cost Specialists, L.L.C- Fullerton, 92831 CA Item 7. - 51 HB -226- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Schedule 8.3 City of Huntington Beach Development Impact Fee Calculation Report Park Improvement Cost Estimates, by Type of Park Pub imps, Roadicurb, gutter, etc. .$200 Linear Foot 1,040 $208,000 2,704 $540,800 Lg Pk Grading/Irrigation/Turf $37,500 Acre 0 $0 15 $562,500 Sm Pk Grading/Irrigation/Turf $42,750 Acre 5 $213,750 0 $0 Plant Material: Trees-5, 24 gallon boxiacre $149 Each 60 $8,940 225 $33,525 Trees-1 5, 15 gallonlacre $290 Each 30 $8,700 75 $21,750_ Shrubs-1 0,five gallon $30 Each 40 $1,200 150 $4,500 Shrubs-30, one gallon $8 Each 120 $960 450 $3,600 Play apparatus Curbing,450' per large $4130 Linear Foot 0 $0 450 $18,585 Curbing, 226' per small $41,30 Linear Foot 225 $9,293 225 $9,2931 Play equipment-large $123,750 Lot G $0 1 $123,760 Play equipment- medium $99,000 Lot 1 $99,000 a $0 Play equipment-small $67,500 Lot 0 $0- 2 $135,000 Sand/Other Surfacing $5,775 Lot 1 $5,775 3 $17,325 Buildings: Restroom - Small $182,000 Each 1 $132,000 1 $132,000 Restroorn - Large $181,500 Each 0 $0 1 $181,500 Equipment storage facility $99,000 Each -0 $0 0 $0 Combined Restroom/Concession $297,000 Each 0 1 $0 1 $297,000_ carking Lot 4" A.C.W1611 Rock base $8.30 Square foot 12,000 $99,600 40,000 $332,000 V-gutter $13.20 Linear Foot 300 $3,960 800 $10,560 Drain Inlet $990 Each 1 $990 2 $1,980 Drain Inlet connector $330 Each 1 $330 2 $660 Storm drain line $19.80 Linear Fool 300 $5,940 200 $3,960 Drive approach $2,970 Each 1 $2,970 4 $11,880 Perimeter curbing $16.60 Linear Foot 490 $8,085 800 $13,200 Striping $0.60 Linear Foot 40-0- $200 1,300 $650 Lighting $2,970 Each 2 1 $5,940 18 $53,460 Lot signage $330 Lot 1 $330 3 $990 Entrance $4,950 Lot 1 $4,950 3 $14,850 Curb and Gutter $15.27 Linear Foot 3,780 $57,721 3,232 $49,353 Storm Drainage Facilities Inlets $1,320 Each 2 $2,640 4 $5,280 Connections $2,145 Each 2 $4,290 4 $8,580 Lateral (to arterial) $82.50 Linear Foot .45 $3,713 so $6,600 Sewer Facilities Connection to arterial $4,125 Lot 1 $4.125 1 $4,125 Line in street $107,30 Linear Foo# 29 $3,112 80 $8,594 Line in park $24.80 Linear Foot 125 $3,100 1,500 $37,200 103 Revenue&Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton,CA 92831 HB -227- Item 7. - 52 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Schedule 8.3 City of Huntington Beach Development Impact Fee Calculation Report Park Improvement Cost Estimates,by Type of Park Fire Hydrant $4,950 Each 1 $4,950 6 $29,700 Street Lights Standards $2,475 Each 3 $7,425 20 $49,500 Duct workiwiring $1,568 Each 3 $4,704 12 $18,816 Water Facilities 31 metered service $4,125 Each 1 $4,125 1 $4,125 Backflow device $4,125 Each 1 $4,126 1 $4,125 Line in street $19-80 Linear Foot 1,320 $26,136 120 $2,376 Water fountains $1,155 Each 1 $1,155 8 $9,240 Fountain lines in park $19,80 Linear Foot 200 $3,960 1,000 $19,800 BenchesfTables Tables, cuemeni.pads $2,475 Each 4 $9,900 60 $148,500 Individual grills $825 Each 2 $1,650 30 $24,750 Benches, cement pads $908 Each 4 $3,632 so $27,240 Bleachers $5,775 Each 0 $0 0 $0 Large Covered Picnic Area(lot) $1231750 Each 0 $0 2 $247,500 Individual Covered Picnic Pad $24,750 Each 1 $24,750 10 $247,500 User Electrical Service park $16,600 Each o $o 1 $16,500 Electrical Service per Area $2,063 Each 1 $2,063 6 $12,378 Game Courts $0 $o Basketball Courts $66,000 Each 1.0 $65,000 1 $65,000 Basketball Court Lighting $57,750 Each 0 $0 0 $L Fenced Tennis Courts $99,000 Each 0 $0 2 $198,000 ,-Tennis Court Lighting $57,750 Each 0 $0 0 $0 Baseball Field-Competitive $82,500 Each 0 $10 0 $0 Ballfield Lighting $412,500 Per two fields 0 $0 0 $0 Baseball Field-Recreational $24,750 Each 1 $24,760 6 $148,500 Pedestrian Walkway 5' Wide $22.28 Linear Foot 500 $11,140 2,000 $44,560 6' Wide $28-88 Linear Foot 100 $2,888 500 $14,440 9' Wide $37.13 Linear Foot 100 $3,713 500 $18,565 Miscellaneous Flatwork .$6.20 Linear Foot 500 $3,100 8,500 $52,700 Small Park Signage $4,538 Lot 1 $4,538 0 $0 Large Park Signage $24,750 Lot 0 $0 1 $24,750 Bike Rack/Pad - $2,890 Each 1 $2,890 6- $17,340 Natural Element Improvement(Lake, 9 $826,000 Each 0 $0 0 $0 Small Concrete Stage $41,250 Each 0 $0 0 $0 Small Arnpitheater stage only, graded $82,500 Each 0 $F 0 $o Large Ampitheater with bowl $247,500 Each fl $o 1 $247,500 Total Cost 1,117,206 $4,339,444 15 Total Acres , Average Cos per Acre $223,441 289 296 104 Revenue&Cost Specialists, LL.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 Item 7. - 53 HB -228- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Schedule 8.3 City of Huntington Beach Development Impact Fee Calculation Report Park Improvement Cost Estimates,by Type of Park Pub imps, Road/curb, gutter, etc. $200 Linear Foot 2,704 $540,800 Lg Pk Gradinglirrigafion/Turf $37,500 Acre 20 $750,000 Sm Pk Gradinglirrigation/Turf $42,750 Acre 0 $0 Plant Material- Trees-5, 24 gallon boxiacre $149 Each 150 $22,350 Trees-1 5, 15 gallonfacre $290 Each 50 $14,500 Shrubs-10, five gallon - $30 Each 100 $3,000 Shrubs-30, one gallon $8 Each 300 $2,400 Play apparatus Curbing,450' per large $41.30 Linear Foot450 $18,585 Curbing, 225' per small $41.30 Linear Foot 225 $9,293 Play equipment -large $123,750 Lot 0 $0 Play equipment- medium $99,000 Lot 1 $99,000 Play equipment-small $67,500 Lot 2 $135,000 Sand/Other Surfacing $5,775 Lot 3 $17,325 Buildings: Restroom -Small $132,000 Each 1 $132.0 DO Restroom- Large $181,500 Each 1 $181,500 Equipment storage facili!y $99,000 Each 1 $99,00.0 Combined Restroom/Concession $297,000 Each 2 $594,000 Parking Lot Off A.C. W16" Rock base $9.30 Square foot 40,000 $332,000 V-gutter $13.20 Linear Foot 800 $10,560 Drain Inlet $990 Each 2 $1,980 Drain Inlet connector $330 Each 2 $660 Storm drain line $19-80 Linear Foot 200 $3,960 Drive approach $2,970 Each 4 $11,880 Perimeter curbing $16.50 Linear Foot Boo $13,200 Striping $0.50 Linear Foot 1,300 $650 Lighting $2,970 Each 18 $53,460 Lot signage $330 Lot 3 $990 Entrance $4,950 Lot 3 $14,850 Curb and Gutter $15.27 Linear Foot 1,664 $26,409 Storm Drainage Facilities Inlets $1,320 Each 4 $5,280 Connections $2,145 Each 4 $8,580 Lateral (to arterial) $82.50 Linear Foot so $6,600 Sewer Facilities Connection to arterial $4,126 Lot 1 $4,125 Line In street $107.30 Linear Foot 80 $8,684 Line in park $24.80 Linear Foot �71,500 $37,200 105 Revenue&Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 HB -229- Item 7. - 54 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Schedule 8.3 City of Huntington Beach Development Impact Fee Calculation Report Park Improvement Cost Estimates, by Type of Park 06it-G Fire Hydrant $4,950 Each 1 $4,950 Street Lights Standards $2,475 Each 20 $49,500 Duct workiwiring $1,568 Each 5 $7,840 Water Facilities 3" metered service $4,125 Each 1 $4,12-5 Backflow device $4,125 Each 1 $4,125 Line in street $19.80 Linear Foot- 120 $2,375 Water fountains $1,155 Each 8 $9,240 Fountain lines in park $19-80 Linear Foot 1,000 $19,800 Benches[Table. Tables,cement pads $2,475 Each 30 $74,250 Individual grills $825 Each 10 $8,250 Benohes, cement pads $908 Each 15 $13,620 Bleachers $5,775 Each 8 $46,200 Large Covered Picnic Area(lot) $123,760 Each 0 $0 Individual Covered Picnic Pad $24,750 Each 4 $99,000 !User Electrical Service park $16,500 Each 1 $16,600 Electrical Service per Area $2,063 Each 4 $8,252 Game Courts $0 Basketball Courts $66,000 Each 3 $198,000 Basketball Court Lighting $57.750 Each a $462,000 Fenced Tennis Courts $99,000 Each 8 $792,000 Tennis Court Lighting $57,750 Each a $462,000 Baseball Field_-Competitive $82,500 Each a $660,000 Ballfield Lighting $412,500 Per two fields 4 $1,650,000 Baseball Field- Recreational $24,750 Each 0 $0 Pedestrian Walkway 5' Wide $22-28 Linear Foot 1,000 $22,280 6' Wide $28.88 Linear Foot 250 $7,220 9' Wide $37.13 Linear Foot 250 $9,283 Miscellaneous Flatwork $6,20 Linear Foot 4,000 $24,800 Small Park Signage $4,538 Lot 0 $0 Large Park Signage- $24,750 Lot 1 $24,750 Bike Rack/Pad $2,890 Each 6 $17,340 Natural Element Improvement(Lake, e $825,000 Each 0 $0 Small Concrete Stage $41,250 Each 1 $41,250 ,Small Ampitheater stage only, graded $82,500 Each 0 $0 Large Ampitheater with bowl 1 $247,500 Each 0 $0 Total Cost Total Acres 20.00 Average Cost per Acre $394,884 106 Revenue&Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 Item 7. - 55 HB -230- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Schedule&4 City of Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Open Space Land Acquisition for Business Uses Land Acquisition Development Impact Fee Calculation Total City-owned Park/Open Space Acres 778.4 Current City--wide Privately Developed Acres 10,271.6 Current Open Space Standard per Developed Acre 0.0758 Acres[Developed Acre Standard 0.0758 Acquisition Cost r Acre $871,200 Cost K Open Space Standard $66,037 Open Space Land Value 25.00% Adjusted Land Cost $16,509.24 Commercial Lodging Keyed Units 36 $459 per Keyed Unit Resort Lodging Keyed Units 46 $359 per Keyed Unit Commercial Acres(in Square Feet) 17,300 $0.954 per Square Foot Industrial Uses(in Square Feet) 21,390 $0.772 per Square Foot 107 Revenue&Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, 92831 CA HB -231- Item 7. - 56 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Master faciR es Plan for the City of Him iugtoo Beach, California October, 2011 (Amended Apri127,2012) Copyri8h4 2009, 2010&2011 by Revenue&Cast Specialists, L.L.C. All rights reserved No part of this work covered by the copyright hereon terry be reproduced or copied ut any form or by any means--graphic, electronic, mechan2cd, including any photomlyigg,recording, hWiing or taping or Information storage and retrieval systems wrt&out written permission 04 Revenue&Cast Speciairs&, L.L.C. 1519 East Chapman A venue, Suite C Fullerton, CA 92831 (714)992 9020 Item 7. - 57 HB -232- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 emus ost P ecia StS,LLC Semfng Local GouenuwrVs Since 1975 October 17, 2011 (amended April 27, 2012) Honorable Mayor and City Council Via Mr. Fred Wilson, City Manager City of Huntington Beach - City Hall 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: City of Huntington Beach Alaster Facilities Plan Honorable Mayor, City Council, and City Manager Wilson, The following Document, the proposed Master Facilities Plan(MFP)is hereby submitted for City Council review and consideration- The proposed MFP is the result of many hours of work between City staff and Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. staff. This document represents a long-range program of identification and recognition of the entirety of infrastructure and physical needs necessary to meet the service demands of an ever-growing residential population and business community. The information included in this proposed MFP identifies capital needs throughout the community and is primarily based on the numerous elements of the Huntington Beach Comprehensive General Plan, it's many elements, Master Plans and other official domments. The City`s five-year Capital Improvement Plan and the proposed development impact fees will be a function of the entire list of proposed projects listed in this document. Stated in a slightly different way, the list of projects contained herein needs to be agreed to by the City Council in order to increase the validity of both of the two above mentioned documents. This Master Facilities Plan contains the following. • A Table of Contents • A Guide to the faster Facilities Plan • A Project Summary schedule • A section containing all Law Enforcement capital needs • A section containing all of the Fire Suppression/Medic capital needs • A section containing all of the Streets, Bridges and Signals projects • A section containing a31 of-, tl er torm DraingSkkstem improvements • A section contin ni'ng th6iYd' re Pu ilici.tlir mad G'oldectian expansion needs, e -t A. r�R'tP..:t.W9tK�7'' ��7'�16S�Cb317. 1 _ HB -233- Item 7. - 58 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Page Two, October 17, 2011 (anteraded 04127112) MFP Letter to the City of Hunihtgton Peach A section containing all of the Park Land Acquisition and Development of Recreation Facilities including Community Use Facilities projects. In addition to the efforts of Bob Hall, Deputy City Manager in coordinating the flow of information, the following staff were instrumental in identifying the required projects- M. Todd Broussard, P.E.- Principal Civil Engineer (Storm Drainage) David C. Dominguez - Facilities Development and Concessions Manager Eric G. Enberg -Division Chief,'Fire Operations Jim B. Engle Community Services Director Kevin Justen,- Senior Administrative Analyst -Fire Tung M. Kao -Info Systems Specialist Darrin Maresh, Fire Development Specialist Tony Olmos -- City Engineer Jerry Thompson - General Services Manager Bill Reardon -Fire MarshalilDivision Chief Dan Richards - Customer SupportlGlS Manager Bob Stachelsld - Transportation Manager Chuck Thomas - Police Captain .ferry Thompson- General Services Manager Bob Wngenroth -Director of Finance RCS appreciates the efforts of the listed staff and any others whose efforts RCS may have been unaware of for their assistance in generating the information provided within this Master Facilities Plan, and we look forward to meeting with the City Council in order to implement and achieve maximum use this comprehensive report, Sincerely, SCOTT THORPF Vice President Item 7. - 59 HB -234- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 City of Huntington Beach Master Facilities flan Table of Contents Guide to Master Facilities Plan i-vi Master Facilities Plan Cost Summary - All Projects I '•xo-xa - arc•i3�•3•^ .x+:toawo-Y':a >vc-x,: :'kift:4}:ox.»:m:csu '<:,ts:.Yiia`YF?'S2otrmxt:9>'o�rv"*�:+�it:�.i:�dt;goo-%os-"::u%i::vi<i^>c;::.^"' `oc5'n;:t:,, ;oK._... :,.;r;:�L:.a is^i:. ''.i�r�S -t,-� `.::"nrc-s ,<a%Jm-5i%a+:aE'X..: --;T).s..,a..iv.fi<h,..::n:x'_,v. i>`v' ::.1:::�ii.•:•T:r,a•X"»., 4W ...1"�i�';Xa�,:rt�ft':a`iya:,Y:»i:x:::F;"ft9�;k,.xcL:}:x:i%.... _ _ :-).S,?:-:'. �-v.:.cu,•xt• - _ '..»:'J:1'<"iX?,*'r>•-'<�:'Fas:x»•i:a.:4.%'.'s.,.,:Y�oo>:� s:.?w'��aax;•%Y-•.c .,2,..<. `�:r.'c"�.<x«oXa%<.'�'i%.?F�.'i� ti,. 3:rc., ,xx't.- :;k'r#"8 `»i:;'•a:t6 k...:-;..yxa %. ,o.,.,7:. .,t.--:�ax'::wr.n�.3i:a: 4x+�s. .xt:• :.T.Y 4-jwrx,;xa.�..+-.•-„',- .Fxw:c ..?'3...":�_9.f....f?a,.. r`X..X%xY:i.Y4:5 i�4 fJ:fSh a:•>»v:-X...>':,i,•Y-0y._. .:•: ^i:.->:ft:`S•� :k'.R::,' :.,,y'T.:°'' o'»-i:yas5,5.5? , iea'�sRu[f4:or.. F - - - 4Y'�.' - J"' ,�: :oJx..hY-•r...�.. F.fi.. },� ''' -- - - - %'»=;`k`,�c''`:.:t".W.,''iri'n.%5T k ,ti:%v `.tt-:t•A k - iW �:iY , �a?3, ':,��,.'-.v n.i-.v n.i.. �S', ." Xat+'%�KJ)[Xr:}:S:{?:6i2•,...,.t_;-,ew::,,.:: ' Yai:•:.,0>...5... v.v:.v'Y.:.....�....:..:,�• ,�•i->\raJs>x.>XSxaGr. '$L:�.a:. � 4"•Fx>'if;� •. Law Enforcement Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment Cost Summary 5 LE-W 1 Additional Law Enforcement Facility Space 6 LE-002 Acquire Additional Response Vehicles 7 LE-003 Acquire Additional Sworn Office Issued Equipment 8 LE-004 Acquire Law Enforcement Specialty Equipment 9 at,,. c.:xu.Xr•:o-xr: - - :a:Jv.F ,•,}••••y.¢o -::3"•}. ,E`n, 2:x:>.t5xia >-RJ :»':,t`.Y - f' .tti $:ii5n% <ov�rr:. f.r i'+t`"` .'�' t� - `�.c "f-. n.$.}4Xa :.y"� $.., 1` `F:r;:�:xi: »xwx'-'.'.C•':�ic»t:4>:4:,�;Xti:iT'• +.:i)rv'''.''='Y#� (::r+'•if:i.�.v.-: -Y'�r'�' +b:atiCy%4Ih-xYa. v'Zr ff A'a-"."`, :#a:. ::�`��x.>i.J -T-:. a.$nr ,�<.�.. }a .u.,7t .;:i:� x.:Xtw� , ,r.Y'fiz'eeX ,� .r 9'.. �4Y:a.•aX. .. - :tFt '>yy :AS F. :v i_ r• t3C-aL x x.. ': ,.:„...:.... .. _'..a:t:•;:mtt?.:44 ..a. .:x�:a . s.tts:<.X,.:;t?aaaxaT��»:e.:: ,:,•,.:.::.:.,,..,,...,.::a.......::....:............:k._..r.....,,,.•,. Fire Suppressio edit Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment Cost Summary 11 FS-001 Relocate Station #8 (Heil) 12 FS--W2 Construct Station #8 (Neil) Apparatus Storage Facility 13 FS--003 Construct a Single Bay/(quarters at Station#4 (Magnolia) 14 FS-004 Acquire an Engine Company and Ambulance for Station #4 (Magnolia 15 FS-005 Acquire an Engine Company for Station#1 (Gothard) 16 FS-006 Acquire an Engine Company for Station#2 (Murdy) 17 i;ag..=::4:3'.:0.....:'iQ•n::'F.:ii-v.,..:_:...•.'.,::...v,».:.,-:rr:.:...:.::...:.:...:.X.:..:vwt.se:a:>;.%aYN.HJ.:, .:,x,. .,,>y;.v., .S%K.x r:?vrx�w Y' » ^4:- ,i.. •ii�;i: =:rY::Y::vSsb'ho; r}.r,:.a:u•Yk•»" :R'\"Y-: jX`<<`•".i$:?i?xrix - - :.v�.';:.:tiii:oi:oi:tiv:oi:;i:a - aY, n _ :i:.ai>a:�-i:•l:fi., .J.v.... ,....Ka`-�.h't'- :,.•. ..... AAA 9AY?di ......: .4.» ..xKAX, .w< - 'f.• L=�..... .�_-, J4f:•!oX,»:t:x?.;. v.L :: - .-.� �^ {:4 S ;�'f.k;-J:'Wf.�•.rrK^b^�• ..., .. .......:. y,,:.,.:.:.,„.:n-.,,.,„-.,,.::,.,,..,:., ., v -a>•x.. a'v: .4x•w. ,:.Y.'t: :tx:.7., .,,,...::,:».:.,•...,.,....:..........:...,..xx-,,..aco5:?a1......... ...........�..:.r.,..?:x:,,ic„v. ....s..a...c......._".. :•:... »1•..,- „kw,a...,.,.T�s.asx...• Circulation (Streets, Bridges and Signals) System Cost Summary 19 ST-001 Beach Boulevard and Edinger Avenue 21 ST-002 Beach Boulevard and Heil Avenue 22 ST-003 Beach. Boulevard a-ad Warner Avenue 23 ST-004 Beach Boulevard and Slater Avenue 24 ST--005 Beach Boulevard and Talbert Avenue 25 ST-006 Beach Boulevard and Garfield Avenue 26 ST-007 Beach Boulevard and Yorktown Avenue 27 ST-008 Pacific Coast Highway and Warner Avenue 28 ST-009 Pacific Coast Highway and Goldenwest Street 29 ST-010 Pacific Coast Highway and Brookhurst Street 30 ST-011 Goldenwest Street and Bolsa Avenue 31 ST-012 Goldenwest Street and Slater Avenue 32 ST-013 Newland Street and Talbert Avenue 33 ST-014 Newland Street and Warner. Avenue 34 ST-015 Newland Street and Yorktown Avenue 35 ST-016 Gothard Street and Slater Avenue 36 ST--017 Gothard Street and Talbert Avenue 37 ST-018 Ward Street and Garfield Avenue 38 HB -235- Item 7. - 60 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 City of Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Table of Contents ST-019 Brookburst Street and Adams Avenue 39 ST-020 Miscellaneous Traffic Signals/Intersection Improvements 40 ST-021 Public Works Maintenance Building 41 ST-022 Public Works Maintenance Vehicles 42 .far. ........... ,, .<gas..a. K..,x�. »..a .�i., .:4> .:�+ -„?f%�r�'.,<.r. :;._>a:`+w:F:.,,•Xvs.. t<t,:,ac?.a:.__r.;~ k�i.::xF. .,,Y':.;;�,;,r^ .:•�;<�-r, y 9-5: a'-?' - xa>RRtisz<2nco-iic�:r.:. ,............... .. ._..a.,., .. :,,. .......-.�,.n,,.,...K,.:..c.-.,.5,....-.:................v..v.e:r:.4x.r,.:.,.+v.,n.....:....�:...... -. ...k... :.<S4: Stoma Drainage Collection System:Cost Summary 44 SD--001 Santa Ana River & Talbert Channel Region (SD Region #1) 45 SD-W2 Coastal and Bolsa Chica Wetlands Region (SD Region #2) 46 SD-003 Slater Channel Region (SD Region #3) 47 SD-004 Wintersburg Channel Region (SD Region#4) 48 SD-005 Bolsa Chica Channel & Harbour Region (SD Region #5) 49 SD-006 Public Works Maintenance Building 50 ,,:.>;;z:x x;:a:;f r,:. - _.'.r:" ,:ar..),xa:e:.::>ye.,;».,.,;;,..,., ..5.:.. _ ..,�••:T5-::<......." y.i{:f. •Y. ..Nl:'i:l. ex�..'at- aY<:. ri.b:}.t,n.Y', b'N•.,."..v'v.'::� - .,.>r�x v".y,.:f. - n'r�'isw%.ri:4..+» z.F,s ,.s<,e ,'•.y,'.ti +'a,.v ,J x-+yrn '.%>:::::%v3i..:->"Cti: _r��` .r::,,:..,.:i.::�.. ..., -T::..,':':':.\.., '.iY.•"': ..v.0 �Et"c },sZ:Fx,;,7,.:, t�>•,^-..Y,., .,y.. - ..5,'Y'':FS"�;".�' _ ,::Pv:'.i:..Lw.-Wf. .x5ta2i> ri):.;xr:"n.r: n raa.. , bS ::k•.;9 4^: i;:(lin:f<>lz< 4JLd3,[:.i::<x73S?- ;a>:n Public Libras-y Facilities and YCol. ection Cost Summary 52x PL-001 Expand Banning Library 53 PL-002 Expand Main Street Library 54 PL-003 Expand LibraryT Collection Items 55 :,wn:ar•..,�S.vc4'sf'fotaz?3i: ,._.... f.... - - -" -- - k:%.'::?o:iN ew%}xd5'o.t;y,n. .\a'.1 - :_:A:Y%:'•s^ 3 �::Fi}x:siac ate, i:+5-:�, .,\-.'•' ':.., V- _...,.�t'.�....;�.�..:::.,r.-r.`Av:�'t`a.,...f:�.*�'"'> .x ....:.,.,,,„_;.. :.........f .:,.:�..ux'.��o`�.:xo>.•.�a.- .,T��s*'x >,axatx x« - � � ox . ^;;.,.�:,.ra:.:a.Jx.ir:;uwxawex.:acws,,;ho:::;t:,,<;:i::�? Park Land Acquisition. and Park Facilities Development Cost Summary 57 PK-001 Bartlett Park Conceptual Plan and DIR 59 PK-W2 Irby Park Phase 11 60 PK-W3 Central Park Former Gun Range EIR, RAP and Development 61 PK-004 Le Bard Park Expansion Master Plan and Development plan 62 PK-005 Blufftop Park Trail Improvements 63 PK-W6 Edinger Dock Development 64 PK-007 'W`ardlow Field Reconfiguration Design/Construction 65 PK-008 City-Wide Parks Master Plan 66 PK-009 Central Park Habitat Plan 67 PK-010 Central Park Acquisiton of Encyclopedia Lots 68 PK-OI I Central Park Development of Remaining 86 Acres 69 PK--012 Central Park Rebuild Two Restaurant Facilities 70 PK-013 General. Youth.Sports Facilities Grants 71 PK-014 Murdy Youth Sports Complex Phase H 72 PK--015 Beach Playground 73 PK--016 Central Park Development of Former Gun Range 74 PK-017 Warner Dock Renovation and Expansion 75 Item 7. - 61 HB -236- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 City of Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Table of Contents PK.-018 Lamb Park Design and Development 76 PK- 019 Central Park Sports Complex Team Room 77 PK-020 Future Parks Acquisition (Possible Closed School Sites) 78 CF-001 Central Park Senior Center 79 CF-002 Edison Community Center Gymnasium. 80 CF-003 Murdy Community Center Gymnasium 81 CF-004 Oak View Recreation Center Expansion 82 xB -237- Item 7. - 62 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No. 2012-66 CITY OF HUNTINGTON]BEACH GUIDE TO THE MASTER FACILITIES PLAN The Master Facilities Plan is a compilation of projects identified by City staff as being needed for the City of Huntington Beach through theoretical General Plan build-out of the City. The Plan is based on input from City staff,recommended projects contained in the City's several Master Plans for infrastructure and an occasional recommendation from RCS staff. The Master Facilities Plan generally provides for three major types of projects. The first group of projects provides for the maintenance, repair and rehabilitation of the City's varied infrastructure, including its streets, storm drains and other public facilities. These projects represent a very small portion of the needed replacement of the City's fixed assets identified at more than$1.435 million of depreciable fixed assets which are being consumed, conservatively, at an annual rate of just over $19.1 million, (assuming a conservative 75 year infrastructure lifetime). The$1.435 billion figure excludes significant amounts of owned park land, not subject to depreciation, at approximately$678.2 million. The following table indicates the replacement costs of the various infrastructure owned by the City. Table MFP-1 Replacement Value of Existing Infrastructure Infrastructure Replacement Value Law Enforcement $71,246,699 Fire Suppression/Medic $61,234,227 Circulation System(i) $533,539,375 Storm Drainage S stem(1) $203,631,313 Library Space/Collection $76,593,112 Park Improvements $488,783,370 IL Total $1,435,028,096 (1)Does not include millions of dollars owned in land fight-of-way and Excludes "local' facilities,those limited to neighborhood facilities. The second group of projects are needed to serve future development and include such projects as widening of streets, creation of additional parkland or construction of a new fire station. These projects are proposed to be funded through the development impact fees recommended in the companion to this document called Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report for City of Huntington Beach. z Item 7. - 63 HB -238- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Guide to the Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan The last group of projects are proposed to enhance the quality of life for all City residents and spur economic growth in the community. These projects include the construction of a community centers, libraries and parks that expand the existing level of service. _Goal of the Master Facilities Plan. The Master Facilities Plan is not intended to be the final word on capital improvement projects needed for the City, but rather a starting point for discussions between policy-makers (i.e., the City Council), City management staff and the public prior to the formulation of a Five-or Six-Year Capital Improvement Plan(CIP). The Muster Facilities Plan begins the process of identifying all growth-related capital projects required to accommodate new City development through General Plan build-out. This document, as all capital improvement . programs should be, is rooted in the philosophy that for the document to have any meaningful value to future residents and staff members, it must be constantly updated and revised as new legislation is adopted and as the environment and the City itself changes over the years. In short, the Master Facilities Plan is intended as a fluid, not static, document. Thus, it is essential that periodic updates be performed to add new projects or delete completed or no longer needed projects. The Master Facilities Plan represents the starting point for fulfillment of the following purposes: Planning -The Plan implements the standards and goals contained in the City's General Plan when applicable and proposes improvement projects which are constructed and located in conformance with the General Plan. Financial Planning - A Facilities Plan or CIP should consider the scheduling and availability of financing sources in order to achieve an orderly and comprehensive process. Individual project descriptions in this document detail the project's relationship to other recomrnended improvements and other scheduling constraints. This effort should always be a high priority of the City in order to insure that efforts between departments are coordinated and to avoid construction made more costly by duplication of construction efforts (i.e. a water pipe installed one year after a road is constructed). A sound capital planning process can also help to rationally plan projects for the purposes of long-term financing. Taxpayers can accrue savings when capital financing is coordinated such that long-term financing can be sized and timed to achieve the lowest possible financing costs. Budgeting-The following projects should provide the outline for preparation of the Five- Year Capital Improvement Plan in the future. The first year of the CIP then is incorpo- rated into the City`s Annual Budget. Note: the scope of services did not include the a.�. HB -239- Item 7. - 64 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Guide to the Huntington Beach Master Facilities-Plan identification of what year the projects will be needed therefore the project costs default to the last column. Master Facilities Planning Process. The Master Facilities Plan represents an interdepartmental effort to identify needed projects through the theoretical point of build-out of the City. Management staff was then asked to allocate projects as a first step towards prioritizing all projects for the Plan. Criteria considered by the management team in evaluating projects included: • Does the project generate operating savings or otherwise enhance the ability of the department to deliver services? ® Did the project reduce or eliminate safety or health hazards? • Was the project needed to provide adequate levels of service to future residents or prevent deterioration of service to existing residents? • Was the project recommended in any of the City's engineering or planning Master Plans, the Corporate Plan or any other adopted City document? ® Did the project have a significant positive effect on the community? Funding_Analysis. The following summary section of this Plan includes a projection of historical and potential revenue sources for the financing of the listed capital improvement projects. Development impact fee revenues were estimated based on the proposed rates recommended in the Development Impact.Fee Calculation and Nexus Report. For the purposes of this Report it was assumed that development will occur evenly over the period of build-out for the-City. Other revenue sources were projected based on discussions with City staff,but are shown only for informational purposes. Given the magnitude of costs shown in this Report, RCS recommends that a more detailed financial strategy for construction of these improvements (i.e., a Capital Financing flan) be conducted by the City within the immediate future. Such a document would seek to further identify and quantify potential financing sources for the City. It should be noted that the Master.Facilities PIan emphasizes the total capital needs of the City, in contrast to the more traditional Capital Improvement Program approach which places more of an emphasis on reducing total needs to only reasonably assured revenue sources. The process of further scheduling projects on a year-to-year basis should continue onward during the Capital Improvement Program process. Organization of the plaster Facilities Plan. The Master Facilities Plan is divided into eight major sections, according to the category of capital improvement. Each will ultimately be quantified as 1.31 Item 7. - 65 xB -240- Exhibit"A" -Resolution No. 2012-66 Guide to the Huntington Peach Master Facilities Plan a separate development impact fee in the companion document. The eight types of improvements are: Law Enforcement Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment-These are projects needed for the City's Police Department, including expansion of the Police Station and acquisition of additional communication equipment and response vehicles. Fire SuppressionlMedic Facilities and Response Vehicles - This program includes facilitie�5 necessary to accommodate new development support with the existing level of service provided by the City's Fire Department. This section contains the need for one fire station relocation, expansion of second., construction of additional vehicle storage space and a number of additional response apparatus_ Circulation(streets,bridges and signals)System-These projects consists of future street additional traffic signals and intersection improvements, Storm Drainage Collection System-These projects include the construction of new storm drain lines, channels and other facilities for the purposes of storm drainage. Public Library Facilities and Collection-This program provides for the expansion of the City-owned library facilities. The project consists of the building expansion and expansion of the collection inventory. Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development-The acquisition and develop- ment of new parks,the construction of recreational facilities for the City and improvement of existing undeveloped parklands are accomplisbed through this program. It also includes open space acquisition and the construction of a number community/recreation/gymnasium centers for classes, meetings, sports activities and other general public uses. At the beginning of each of these sections is a summary of projects in that category and proposed project cost. Next, is an individual project description for each project submitted, detailing the proposed scope of the project, the submitting department, justification and listing of related projects_ The table on the following page indicates the total project expenditures ($443,399,086)identified as necessary through build-out. Some of this amount, about$22.3 million would be financed by other revenues or government agencies. iv HB -241- Item 7. - 66 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Guide to the Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Table MFP-2 Cost of Future Infrastructure Infrastructure Project Totals Law Enforcement Facilities, et. al, $10,100,895 Fire Suppression/Medic Facilities et. al. $11,941,972 Circulation (Streets/Bridges/Signals) $28,537,800 Storm Drama e Collection System $207,494,050 Library Facilities/Collection $7,941,369 Parr Land Acquisition &Improvements 3137,483,000 Total $403,399,086 Fairness and reason(as well as the more important State and Federal statutes and court decisions) dictate that not all of the projects will qualify for development impact fee funding (i.e. some projects are replacements or service level increasing, etc.). If the City adopts the development impact fees that represent the General Plan Build-out need-based impact fees(Schedule 2.1 in the companion Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report), 42.6% of the required funding(or$172.1 million)would be raised with development impact fees. Existing Development Impact Fee Fund balances of$3.6 million will provide 0.9% of the total project funding and other sources (inter-governmental support) will finance 5.7% ($23.0 million) This leaves 50.8%, or $204.8 million of the total project costs as unfunded,to be financed by other sources such as fees, rates, existing taxes or voter approved additional taxes, inter-govermnental transfers and the rare occasional grant. Relationship to Development Impact Fee R nort The Master Facilities flan was prepared in conjunction with the City's Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report, also prepared by RCS, LLC. Projects listed in the Development Impact Fee Calculation and Ne= Report correspond to projects found in this document and contain the same numbering sequence as the Minster Facilities Plan, The Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report is also contains eight chapters specific to each one of these infrastructure sections according to the same category of projects described on the previous page. Thus, a reader who wants to find more information on Law Enforcement Project No.I (Additional Law Enforcement Facility Space found on Schedule 3.1 of the Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report may turn to Project No. LE-001 of the Master Facilities Plant. For readers of the Master Facilities Plan who wish to understand the determination of development v Item 7. - 67 HB -242- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Guide to the Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan impact fee financing more fully, refer to the Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report, Chapter One. vi HB -243- Item 7. - 68 Exhibit"A" -Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Master Project List rIftTnru �.�,Bt�lrJ"Out I -001 Addi$onal Law Enforcement Facility space $7,5 7,165 LE002 Acquire Additional Response Vehicles $1,751,040 LE-003 Acquire Additional Sworn Officer Issued Equipment $327,690 LE004 Auquire Law Enforcement Specialty Equipment $425,000 FS001 Retocate Fire Station#8(Hell) $7,169,470 FS002 Construct Station,#8(Hell)Apparatus Storage Facility $1,716,044 FS003 Construct A Single Say/Quarters At Station 44(Magnolia) $1,266,458 FS004 Acquire An Engine And Ambulance For Station#4(Magnolia) $740,000 FS005 Acquire An Additional Engine For Station#1 (Gothard) $525,000 FS006 Acquire An Additional Engine For Station#2(Murdy) $526,000 LG001 Beach Boulevard And Edinger Avenue $600,000 LGD02 Beach Boulevard And Heil Avenue $1,000,000 LGO03 Beach Boulevard And Warner Avenue $400,000 L0004 Beach Boulevard And Slater Avenue $500,000 L0005 Beach Boulevard And Talbert Avenue $1,000,000 LD005 Beach Boulevard And Garfield Avenue $1,004,10DO LM07 Beach Boulevard And Yorktown Avenue $500,000 LGO08 Pacific Coast Highway And Warner Avenue $2,000,000 LGO09 lladfrc Coast Highway And Goldenwest Street $760,000 LOD1 D Pacific Coast H igMvay And Brookhurst Streat $750,000 LGD11 Goldenwest Street And Boise Avenue $500,000 LGO12 Goldenwest Street And Slater Street $50,000 L0013 Newland Street And Talbert Avenue $5DQ,000 LU14 Newland Street And Warner Avenue $30,000 L=5 Ncwrarid street And Yorktown Avenge $300,000 I V:1.33.0 Datb;610=012 - lmw 10:55 AM HunMgt=Beach Odober,2011 Pogie; T Item 7. - 69 HB -244- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Master Project List TrtaiThru . G.P.e6uitd-flat 1-0016 Gothard Street And Slater Avenue $500,00D LGO17 Gothard Street And Talbert Avenue $2664,000 L,0018 Ward Street And Garfield Avenue $8,800 LGO19 BrooNhurst Street And Adams Avenue $10,000;000 LGG20 Miscellaneous Traffic Signallini--rsection Improvements $5,000,000 LC.021 Public Works Maintenance Building $2$20,300 1,0022 Public Works Maintenance Vehicles $65,000 SDO01 Santa Ana River&Talbert Channel Region(SD Region 01) $23,728,000 SDO02 Coastal And 13olsa Chlca Wetlands Region LSD Region42) $21;527,00 BODU Slater Channel Region (SD Region#3) $34,236,000 90004 Wintersburg Channel Region(Sb Region#4) $28,749,000 Sg005 Bolsa Chica Channel&Harbour Region(SD Region 45) $98,549,000 SD006 Public works Maintenance Building $705,050 PL:001 Expand Banning Branch Library $5,268,470 PL,002 Expand Main Street Branch Library $1,651,376 K-003 Expand Library Collection items $921,524- PK001 Bartlett Park Conceptual Plan And EIR $5,400,000 FIK002 Irby Park Phase 11 $500,000 PK003 Central Park Former Gun Range EIR, RAP Ar1d Development $4,325,000 PK004 Le Bard Dark Expanalon Master Plan And Development flan $1,450,000 PK005 Blufftop Park Troll Improvements $'1,D00,nno PK006 Edinger Dock Development $700,000 PK007 Wardlow Feld Reconfiguration Design/Construction $1,000,000 PK008 City-Wide Barks Master Plan $350,000 PK:009 Central bark Habitat Plan $250,000 2 V:1.33,0 pate:51G212012 Tifne:10:55 AM Huntington BCach October,2011 Page 2 HB -245- Item 7. - 70 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Master Project List Timd-rhm Q.P.Band-aui PK010 central Park Acquisiton Of Encyclopedia Lots $1,020,000 PK011 Central Park Development Of Remaining 86 Acres $20,000,000 PKD12 Central Park Rebuild Two Restaurant Facilities $600,000 PM13 General Youth Sports Facilities Grants $4,500,000 PK014 Murdy Youth Sports Complex Phase II $2,500,000 PK016 Beach Playground $850,000 PK016 Central Paris Development Of Former Gun Range Area $3,0W,000 PK097 Warner Dock Renovation And Expansion $800,000 PKD18 Lamb Park Design And Development $1,100,000 PK019 Central,Park Sports Complex Team Room $100,ODO PK020, Future Parks Acquisition(Possible Closed School Sites) $59,688,004 PK021 Gentral Park Senior Ge€rter $22,000,000 P14022 Edison Community Center Gymnasium $2.975,0430 PK023 Murdy Comrunity Center Gymnasium $2,976,000 PK024 NIK View Recreation Center Expansion $800,000 Total All Projects L_ 3 V., 1.33.0 [)at@,5r02=12 Time;11;01 AM HantingWn Beach Dctaber,2011 rage; 3 Item 7. - 71 HB -246- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 City of Huntington Beach Park Land acquisition and Park Facilities Development 56 HB -247- Item 7. - 72 r--I- CD J Huntington Beach w Master Facilities Plan Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Deveiopment 2o1s.1� Through Project SuVd 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 20 4.1$ SUM Out out Total PK 401 3atlJett Park Conceptual Plan And EIK $400,000 S4 $0 SO �OC4,ODD $6.400,000 PK-002 khy Park Pha$e Il 30 so $0 90 $500,000 34001nao PK-003 Central Park FermerGun Range EIA,RAPAnd Deydlopment 5325,000 $0 $0 so 84,000,DD0 jrA,325,000 PK_C44 Le Bard Park Expan3lm Master Plan And Duef6pmrat Man $$250,000 $0 $0 34 ,$1,200,000 $1,4s0,000 PK-005 Btuftlep Paik TrW1 Improvements $0 so 50 $D $1,00D,040 $1,000,000 PK-DOG Edinger DAdl D,--Mopmart 50 $0 $0 $D S7CD,00D $7a0,000 Pit-DU7 VfnrdlmvFtsddRecOnfigunkriVedgnlCaneuuctton $120.000 $0 so 50 $880,000 s1,Oc0,0D0 PKAN City-%Aft Pa0m Me"Plan Ta 60 SO 80 $350,000 $360,000 PK-000 Contra$Paultgat7EalPlan 30 30 SO 30 $250,000 $250,00D PJS-01D Central ParkAcTmt riOf Encyclopedia Lcb $0 so .$D 50 $11102D,g00 $1020,000 PK-611 Cgrrtral PerR Development Of Remaining N Acrvs $p $D $0 .D $20,000,000 520,0DD,000 PK-012 Centsl Park Rebulld Two R"taurantFacilities so $0 SD 90 $800,000 VCD,0w PK-013 GerbmlRYouth Sports Facilities Grants $150,00D 3150,000 .$150,000 S180,000 SU00,000 $4 500,000 C17 PK•014 Murt#yYauth Sports CampW Phase}II 30 s0 $0 $0 .$2,60a,000 5za04,000 PK-D15 BQ2ah Playground so $0 $0 $0 $3w'aw $360.000 '•' PK-old ConlrviPaAkDerarvDmantCfPormnr Gun RartyoAxea $0 $0 $D $D $3000,000 S3,C4D,4D0 a PK-017 Vlarnar nook Renouatcn And Expansion $0 SD $0 ?A $000.000 'sam"o 91 PK•1110 Lan*Park DasignNndDcvo7opment so $0 $Q 90 51,100,COD $1.160,Dc0 � C PK4314 Contra#Park Spars ComFtsx Tears Room .TD 90 SD $0 $1CO,000 3100.000 O PK•020 Future Parks ADqulsI50n(Possible Closed Eebool Shea) $D £D $0 80 35%56k000 $39,888,000 PK-021 Central PerkSentDrCeeber $0 $0 $0 .$0 .$2"D0,0W 522,0DR4000 � PK-02 tdmon Cwununt y tanier%jnnerivm SD $0 $0 $0 .$2,075,Op0 1%zaT5,000 N • a\ a\ v 1-1.12.0 Date: 5M212012 T1me"11.02 AM Huntington Beach October,2011 Paga: i Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development 2015-16 Through PrciJadGuild 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 $ulMpUt Out Total PIC-023 Vanfy Community Center Gyrruiaisfum 30 s0 $o 40 T2,675,00U $2,4375,000 PR 024 Oax View Ramaton Gondar Esgmnsicn bt3 Sa $0 .SO SOOD,000 SeC4,0UU TOTALS $1,245,00 sis0,000 $150,UC0 $15s,000 $135708,000 $f874sa,atlu i4ota3: 1)IfpmjeCt timing is not a Component of this effort,than on praJeots default fothek-RTu Bulks Our amount. Y r C 0 i✓ o' z 0 N O_ N Ln 00 V:1,12.0 date: &02t2012 True:'t1:s}2 AM HUnlingmn Beach Clctober,2011 Page: 2 CD J t J Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Infrasiructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Fodlities Development Project Wrnber:/Title PK 001 Bartlett Park Conceptual Plan And EIR Submitting Departments: Community Services Project Description: The project consists of the environmental assessment and conceptual plan forthe remaining 28 acre Bartleff Park largely an Environmentally Sensitive HebltedArea(ESHA).The preliminary plans include a nahmd-passive use consisting of trails,trailheed kiosks,and limited,natural parlong. Jusf6icalion/CD n seq uences of Avoidance: The paskimprnvementsweneededforproteclionofthecurrentlyopenorvacantpercel. Roughly 913/,of the park would remain untouched with improvemenrts designed to protect that 905/L Relationship to General Plan Development Little direct relationship,but the improvements are consistent with the Ws General Plan Recreation Element and indirectly support the additional residents resulting from new development, The project is also capacityincreesing. Allocation TD General Plan Buildout: 0.00% Reference Document ProjectTiming: The design and environment assessment component is planned for 2009 to 2010_ The first construction component is planned for between 2010 end 2020. 2015-15 PROPOSED EWENDITURES 2011-12 2D12-13 2013-14 2014-15 through eulld-out Total all Years 1.Design/Engineering/Adrninistratic 400,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5D0,00a,0o 900,000,00 2,Land Acquisition/Right Of Way 0,00 D.00 0.00 0.00 O.DD 0.00 3.Construction 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,DD0.000.00 4,000,000.00 4.Contingency D.OD 040 0.00 0.00 5DO,000.00 500,000-00 5_Equipment/Other O.OD 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.00 TOTAL COST: 400,000.00 0.0D 0.DO 0.00 5,D00,000.OD 5,400,000.00 59 V:1,08.0 Date: 4127f2012 Tense:11:36A1df Huntington Beach October,2011 Item 7. - 75 xB -250- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail In€rmtruclure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development Project hlumbsr/Tit a PK 002 Irby Park Phasell Submitting Departments: Community Services Project Description: The project consists of the development of the remaining eight acres. Construct bio-filter and water retention area. In add€tion,construdk'ails, passive pocket areas.interpretive signs and a small area of neighborhood park improvements(dirriWrlg apparatus,benches,picnictables) adjacentto the neighborhood area The more active pertion would be designed in atashinnto protect the more natural areas. Justification I Dun sequences of Avoidance: The park needs a ou m b ination of pass ive/active improvements to create a b aionce of active uses wb protection of the water retention needs.The water retention needs would receive appropriations from storm drainage sources.a State Public Works Grant Relationship to General Plan Development Little drreci relationship,butthe improvements are aonsielentadththe City's General Plan Recreatipn Elementcmd indirectly supportthe additonat residents resulting from new development.The project is also capae'dy increasing. Allocation To General Plan Buildout 9.9W. Reference Document ProjectTiming: Based upon receipt of State(P'ublicWorks)Grant The project is in conjunction'AM a PW State Grant-matching funds. 2015-18 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013.14 2014-15 thrauKlhBuild-nut Total 41Yeam 1. Design I Engineering f Administratit D.00 0.00 0.00 D,00 so,ow.o0 50,wo•oo 2.Land Acquisition I flight Of Way D.00 n 00 0_00 a_00 0.00 0.00 3_Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 400.000.DD 400,000.00 4.Contingency 0.00 O.DO 0.00 0.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 5.Equipment I Other 0,00 0.00 0.00 13.00 0.00 0,00 TOTAL COST: O.DD 0.00 0.00 0,00 500,00mo0 500,000.00 60 V:1.08.0 Date: 4/27/2012 Tiime:11:36 AM Huntington Beach October.2011 KB -251- Item 7. - 76 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Infrastucture. Park Land Acquisifion And Park Facilities Develop ment Project NumberjTitle PK 053 Central Perk Former Gun Range EIR.FLAP And Development Submitting Departments: CommunitySennces Project Description. The project consists of an Environmental impact Review;Remedial Action Plan and u Itimat*a development plan, The gun range has bean inactive far overten years and the accumulated lead in the soil and use of creosote wood presents an en ironmental problem end mus#be remedieted before re-use. Phase I consists of preparation of an Environmental impactReportand RemedlslAction Plan. Phase II(S2A million)is an estimate of the range remediedion. Phase 91(also.$2.0 million)is the actual site improvements to turn it into an active perk use, proposed atthis time to be a skate park. Justification j Consequences of Avoidance: The roughtyiive acre gun range area is part of the O yls major regional parfc and needs to be used to its me-i num potential in u yetto be determined menner, Reldk onsbip to General Plan Development Little direct relationship.but the improvements are consistentY�ith the Guys General Plan Recreation Element and indirecttysupporithe additional residents resulting from new development The project is also capacity increasing. Allocation To General Plan Buildcut: 0.00% Reference Document ProjectTming: The stuctyjfeport site rame6ation and site improvements are planned far a period between 2010 and 2020, 2016-1s PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012.13 2013.14 2014-15 thrcwgh Sdid-out TCUIall Years 1,Design I Engineering IAdministratic 325,ODOM 0.00 0.00 O.UD 0.00 325,000,00 2.Land Acquisition!Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 3.Cortstruc ion O.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,000,000.00 4,000,000.0D 4.Contingency a,00 0.00 0_00 0.00 D,OO 0.00 5.Equipment/Other 0.00 O.On 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL COST: 325,000.00 O.oO 0,00 O.OD 4,000,0D0.00 4,325,000.00 61 V_1.08.0 Date: 4127/2012 Time:11:36 AM Huntington Beach October,2011 Item 7. - 77 xB -252- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail 1nfrostmcWre: Park LandA-quisitionAndParkFacilitiesDevelopment Project Numbed Title PK 004 Le Bard Park Expansion Muster Plan And iDevelopment Plan Submitting Departments: community Services Project Description: Undertake the Park Master Plan and construction documents necessmyto expand the turf area end park amenities an the twc remaining undeveloped awes, The improvementswiill be completed in asingle phase. Improvements also--indudethe elimination of drainage problems and construction of a remp to the SentaA kiRverTrail. Justification/Consequences of Avoidance; The park improvements are necessary to complete the parkand maximize the roughly five acres available atthis park Relationship to General Plan Development Little direct relationship,butthe improvements are consistentvAth the QVs General Plan Recreation Element and indirectly support0m addi6onet residents resulting from new development The project is also capdcityincreasing, Allocation To General Plan Buildout 0.004/ Reference Document: Project Timing; As park related revenues becorns available. z0�s-1s PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2D13-t4 2014-16 th�ensAd-wt €atA41Yews 1,Design I Engineering tAdministratic 250,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 260,000.00 2.Land Acquisition 1 Right Of way 0.00 0-00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.Construction OM 0.00 0.00 0,00 1,200,000.00 1,20D,D00.00 4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 O.Do 0.00 0.00 0,DI 5_Equipment I Mer 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.D0 0,D0 0.00 TOTAL COST: 250,000_01) om 0,00 0.00 1,200,000.00 1,45D,000.04 62 V.1.08.0 Bate: 4/27=12 Tsne:11:n AM Huntington Beach October,2011 Hs -253- Item 7. - 78 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 . Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Faci[ities Development ProjectNurnber{True PK 005 Blufftop Park Trail Improvements 5ubmittingDepartments: Comm unityServices Project Description: Construct improvements to the e>isting two and a half-mile tang asphaRtmil,including a sprit trail system for pedestrian and wi-meled traffic. The project inciudes 15%for citizen input project designjenglneering,soils and materials testing,projeutplan Checkand construction inspection, The project also indudes a staridard 1IN for project contingancr, Justification j Consequences of Avoidance.- The project is necessaryto reduce the rate of erasion ofthe very important blufftop area. Relationship to General Plan Development: None directly,the improvements are primarily necesseryto moIntein an existing asset Allp=tion To General Plan Buildout: Utr Reference Document ProjectTiming: As revenues permit 2015-16 PROPOSED D<PENDITURES 2011-12 2D12-13 2013-14 21314-16 through Build-au4 Total all Yews 1.Design f Engirieeting/Administratk 0.00 O,DO 0.00 0.DO 120,000.00 1120,000,00 2.Land Acquisition/Bight Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.Canstructlon 0.00 0.00 0AD 0.00 800,0S10.00 80D,000.00 4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 80,000.00 60,000.00 5.Equipment f Other 0.00 0.00 D.OD D.00 0.00 0.on TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Wo 1,0ag0DD.0D 1,000,000.00 63 V: 1.08.0 Date: 4127/2012 Tune:11:35 AM Huntington Beech October,2011 Item 7. - 79 HB -254- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Bead Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Infrastructure: Park Land Acquishion And Pa*Facil'rtiesDevelopment Project Number:/Title PK JIN Edinger Dock Development Submitting Departments: Community services Project Description: Construct a new dock and boat launch. Jusftzfion I Consequences of Avoidance: The improvements needto be made to meet#l3e recreational boating needs of the community. Relationship to General Plan Development Little directreiationskip,butths improvements are consisterdwrththe CiVs General Plan Recreation Element and indirectly supportthe adMonsl residents resulting from newdevelopmenL Allocation To General Plan BtAdout 4.I1©f Reference Document Project l'iming: Within priorltyand as Perk Fund revenues become available. 2D15-15 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 tf=ugh Build-out Trial rill rears 1.Design I Engineering I Administratic 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,00 50,000.00 50,000.00 2.Land Acquisition 1 Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0D 0,00 0.00 4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6W,D00.00 600.000.00 5•Equipment!Other 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 60,000.00 60.000.00 TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 ROD 0.00 700,000.00 700.000.00 64 V:1.08.0 Date: 4127/2012 Tlrne:11:36 AM Huntington Eeach Qctriber,2911 HB -255- Item 7. - 80 Exhibit"A" -Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development Project Number/Title PK 007 Wardlow Field Reconfiguration DesigrVCanstruction Submitting Departments: Community Services Project Description: Reconfigure the parkto accommodate a youth sports field and plan for additional parking. Construction costs for the I-rt5e,league field and parking lot are included at M0,000. .Justification f Consequences of Avoidance: The parks earlier configuration is ineifiriont in temts of space. Relationship to General Plan Development: Little direct relationship,butthe improvements are consistertvuith the Dity'e General Plan Recreation Element and indirecily supportthe additional residents resulting from new development AllocaGonTo General Pion Buildaut: Reference Document: Project Timing: 2010. sots-10 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-1 3 2M 3-14 2014-15 through Build-w Total all Years 1.Design r Engineering rAdministratic 120,D00,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 120,000.00 2.Land Acquisition r Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 S.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 800,000.00 =,000.00 4.Contingency o.OD 0.00 0.00 0.00 80,000.00 80,000.00 5.Equipment I Mar 0.01D 0.00 0.1)0 0.00 0,r* 0.00 TOTAL CAST: 120J)00.00 0.D0 0.00 0A1D 880,000.00 1,000,000.D0 65 V:1,08,0 Date: 4r27/2012 Time:11:36 AM Kuntington Beach October,2011 Item 7. - 81 HB -256- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Infroshvcture: Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development Project NumberjTitle PK D08City-Wide Parks Master Plan Submitting Departments: Community Services Project Description: The project consists solely of the preparation of a Parks Master Plan- Justification/consequences of Avoidance: A Master Plan of Parks is needed to insure the continued rational programmed development of the City parks system. Relationship to General Plan Development A Park Master Plan forthe continued development ofthe City's Park system is directly related to General Plan development. Allocation To General Plan Buildout: Uwe Reference Document Project"liming: The project is scheduled for the period of 2010 to 2M, 2015-16 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 =3-14 2014-15 throughBuiid-out 7otal all Yews 1.Design I Engineering I Admirfttratic 0.00 0.00 0.00 ODD 350,000.00 350,000,00 2-Land Acquisition I flight Of way D.00 O.DO 0.00 O.OD 0.00 0,00 3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 D.DO D.00 5.Equipment/Other 0-00 O_OD D.00 D.DD 0.00 0.00 TOTAL COST. 0.00 0.0 0-00 0,00 350,000.00 350,000.00 66 V:1.08.0 Date: 4/27M12 Time.11:36 AM Huntington Beach October,2011 Ns -257- Item 7. - 82 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Perk Facilities Development Project Number./Title PK 009 Central ParkHabitat Plan Submitting Departm9nis: Community Services Project Description: Complete on enhanced habits#plan for entire Central Perkarea.The plan is necessaryfor mitigating the raptorforaging ales related to the areas slated for construction of the proposed Centra]Park Senior Center. The results may indicate the need for a nne-to-one basis within the park.Thetis.all negative impacts must be Cully mitigated. Justification i Consequences of Avoidance: The area proposed iorthe Senior Citizens Center has been vacarltfor a great deal of time and has become a raptorfora*g area. The City needs to study the entire park area and determine if and how the impact of the proposed development of the Senior Center can be mitigated on a park-ride basis. Relationship to General Plan Deveioprnent Little direct relationship,butthe improvements are consistent with the City's General Plan Recreation Element and indirectly support the additional residents resulting from new development Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 0.00% Reference Document ProjectTiming As revenues permit ems-16 PROPOSED EWENDITt RES 2011-12 2012-13 2013,14 2014-15 through Build-oul TOW all Yoms 1.Design/Engineering/Administradc 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 250.000.00 250,000.00 2.Land Acquisition/Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01) 0.00 0.00 3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.Contingency o.00 0.00 a.a0 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.Equipment/Other 0.00 a_00 0.00 o_oa 0.00 0.00 TOTAL COST. 1100 0.00 0.00 0.00 25400a0o 250,000.00 67 V:1.08.0 Date: 412712012 Time:f t:35 AM Huntington Beach October,2011 Item 7. - 83 HB -258- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Infrastructure,. Park Land Acquisition And PerkFacllitiesDevelopment Project Number:/Title PK 010 Central PwkAcquisrton Of Encyclopedia Lots Submitting Departments: CommunitySenAces Project.Description: The expenditwes alIowtorthQ acquisition offi"ne privately omted lots I owed vrithinp ark boundaries of approximately V0,000 per lot. The small,individual lots are located generally north of Ellis,south of Edwards end west of Golden West Aye nu es. .fustiiicaflon(Consequences of Avuidance: The acquisition of the small lots is necessary to allow torthe complete development and thus maamization,of Central Park Reletonship to General Plan Development Little direct reIatbnship,but the improvements are consistent with the CiVs General Plan Becreati©a lrlement and indirectly sup port the additional residents resuhng from newd eve lapment The project is also capacity increasing, Aflocaton To General Plan Buildout: 0.0131 Reference Docuinent Project Timing; As Park Fund revenues permit 2016-16 PROPOSED EXPFNDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Uro4hBold-out TOW QHYea.. 1.Design;I Engineering 1 Adrninistratic 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.Land Acquisition i Rlght Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11020,000.00 1,020,000.00 s.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0D 0.00 S.Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,020,000.00 1,020,000.00 68 V:1.0e,,0 DaW 4127/2012 Time:11:36 AM Huntington Beach October,2011 BB -259- Item 7. - 84 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development ProjectNumberJTrtle PK 011 Central Pork Development Of Remaining 86 Acres Submitting Departments: Community Services Project Description: Complete the mostly passive area of the perk,near Ellis and Golden WestAvenues.with trails,picnic areas,a restroom artd addNonal parking pertbe Central Park Master Plan. dustifreafon I Consequences of Avoidance: The improvements are necessary to maximize the use of this major parr. Relolionshipto General Plan Development Little direct relationship,butthe improvements are consistent With the Cloys General Plan recreation Element and indirecfly supparithe additional residents resulting from newdevelopment The project is also cepacity increasing. Allocation To General Plan Buildout 0.04 0 Reference Document ProjectTiming: As park capital revenues permit_ 2015-16 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 &mugh Build-nuf Tdal all Years 1_Design I Engineering I Admiaistrafic a_oo 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 2.Land Acquisition I Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 D.Do 0,00 0.00 3.Construction D.DD 0.90 0,00 0.00 2D,000,000.0o 20,000,ODGM 4.Conttngency 0,00 o.oD 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 6.Equipment i Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,0D TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0_00 0.00 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 69 V.1.D8,0 Date: 4/2 7 120 1 2 Time:11:36 AM Huntington Reach October,2011 Item 7. - 85 HB -260- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail infrastructure: Paris Land Acquisitian And Park Facilities Deveic pment ProjedNumberjTltle PK 012 Central Park Rebuild Two RestaurcM Facilities Submitting Departments: CommunityServiaes Project Description: Rebuild the'Park Bench Cafe"and"Alice's Restaurarrt Justification I Consequences of Avoidance: The facilities are nee3riythirtyysars old and in need of replacement. Relationship to General Plan Development These improvements are largely concession-based improvements and thus financed with long-term concession revenues, Allocation To General Plan Buildout 0.00 a Reference Document: ProjactTiming: As revenues permit and as negatiors are completed. ZU15-16 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2MI-12 2012-13 20'3-14 2014.15 nxaughUld-out Total all Yem t. Design I Engineering IAdmInistratic D,DD 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.Land Acquisition i Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.Construction 0.00 0.00 o.OD 0.00 800,000.00 800,00D.00 4.Contingency o.00 O.DO 0.00 0_00 O.OD 0.00 5.Equipment I Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.DD O.Do TOTALCOST: 0.00 0100 0.00 0100 800,DOO.00 60g000,00 70 V: 1.08.0 Date: 412712012 Time:11:36 AM Huntington Beach October,2011 xB -261- Item 7. - 86 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Bea+di Faster Facilitles Plan Project Detail tnkas jwum' Park Land Acquisition And Pettit iradWes Development PMledNiumber. T-rde PK 013 GDnered Youih Spo.ds Facilities Grants Su4rltiifingDepartments: ComraunkrServicas Project t3esaiption: Tire proposed expend kra ads as seed m oroytor grouts obtained lay voiunteeryouth eporo programs. The project consists of$150,0100 per Yew In grant d"ista ace, Jusitfrcati0n f Crxnseouences af.4vgide�nce: The City has had along•tsrm policy of assisting 1c=l croups leverage aty rnurieyior common perk Gme irMrawrnants. AmIattlonshipto Gene rat Plan Development LMPcfimtxmlebonshi L but the imprmamantsare cons is�--nt with the CiVsGeneralPuriRarraoti0anElement and lndirecilysuppadMe additional rasldents rs,;PKing from new development. Ailotat'rortTq General Firm BuildoLA: OWN Relarence Docurrort Project Timing: As requastec Lary iccai groups ftI have success an o4toining grards or otherfinandal assistfanru. ams.1G PROPOSED EXPE-MU1`URES 2011-12 .ZW2-42 2M-14 2014-1S twavh Vulk QL1 TM all 1'em 1.Design 1 E,ngineeriN 1 Administratk 0,00 0,00 00 0.00 0.00 00 2.Law Aequlsition/Right Of Wqy 0.00 0.G0 0.00 0.00 too 0" a.CongtrucliDn 150,000.00 150,000.00 15DPDC-.uo 150,000,00 0,900,00D,n0 4,500,000,(>D 4.Cor&gar4y 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,DO O.DD 0.00 S.Equlpment/Cuter 0.00 0.09 fl.OD 000 am D.00 TOTAL COST. 150,000,00 10,00,00 150,DD0.00 150,00.00 3,900,000,W 4.5D0,0130.00 71 V.1,08.0 Date: 510212012 Trme:10;46ADA Fitrnfingion Beach October.2011 Item 7. - 87 HB -262- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development Project Number.{Tffle PK 014 Murdy Youth Sports Complex Phase II Submitting Dapartments: Community Services Project Descriplan: Reconfigure the current parWschcol configuration to increaseyouth sports capabilities. The City and school districlyAll amend the e)dsdng joint use agreement and the Ciy will cmtstructa spoils field on school prcpe-rty. There vAl€also be parking lot improvements vAthadditional spaces and alum-around. Justification/Consequences of Avoidance: The ebs5ng field configuration does not maximize the existing field space for use byyouth sports associations and the re-design of the existing park and school parcels will address this shortcoming. Relationship to General Plan Development The existing field configuration does not maximizelhe 2odsting field space for use byyuuth sports associations and the re-designwiH address this. Atlocatlon To General Plan Buildout: 0,00% Reference Document Project Timing: As revenues permit 2016-1@ PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 7raughBud-out ToWallYears 1.Design/Engineering i Administratic 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.Land Acquisition t Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,500,000M 4500,000.00 4,Contingency 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 aoo 5.Equ€pment/Other 0-00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0-00 0-00 TOTAL COST: a.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 72 V_1.08,0 Date; 4127/2012 Time:11:36 AM Huntingion Beach October,2011 HB -263- Item 7. - 88 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development Project Number/Title PK 015 Beach Playground Submitting Deperhnents: Community Services Project Description: Construct Mot foVyauth playground with capabilityt0 serve the needs of two different age groups. The improvement would be located on the Uybeach north of the pier adjacent to 13lufftop Pack at9th Street The park would have asphalt access with aturnabout Justification/Consequences of Avoidance: The improvements are intended to improve the beach day experience for youths. Relationship to General Plan Development The erastingfield configuration does notmeximizethe existing field spacefor use byyouth sports assadations and the re-design will address this. Allocation To General Plan Buildout Uo% Reference Document Project Timing: As revenues permit 2015-16 PRO POSFD EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012.13 2013-14 2014-15 UV"h BU5"rd Tatal all Years 1.Design 1 Engineering J Adminiskatic 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.a0 2.Land Acquisition!Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.oa 0.00 0.00 3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.100 o.0a 350,000,00 350,000.00 4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.Equipment/Other 0,00 0.00 aao 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.0o 0.00 0.00 s50,000.00 350,000.00 73 V: 1.08.0 Date: 4127t412 Trme:11:36 AM Huntington Beach October,2011 Item 7. - 89 xB -264- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development ProjectNumber/Title PK 016 Central Park Development Of Former Gun Range Area Submitting Departments, Communily5ervices Project Desrrlptfnn: The project consists of the removdi ofthe existing gun range and designing(oonstructing a skate parkfaOlfty. Justification f Consequences of Avoidance: The City currenlly has no facilities of its own far in-line skating end skatehorarding in this area ofthe community and"411 need to offset the loss of the Edsting Flurrlington Beach High Sehool skate facility_ Relationship to General Plan Development None directly,butthe proposed skate facility is capacity increasing. Allocation ToGeneral Plan Duilduut fl.fl0� Reference Document Project Timing: The project design is plannedfor 2010 and the construction betomen 2010 and 2020. 2015-16 PROPOSED EXPEMITURES 2ul1-12 2012.13 2013-14 2014-15 thmLQh60ld-out Total all Ye= 1,Design I Engineering I AdminiWatit 0.00 0.00 C.DO D.00 360,000.00 360,000.00 2.Land Aorluisition 1 Might Of Way D.00 D.DD 0.00 0.00 0.00 D.00 3,Construction 0.00 0.00 0,00 O.oD 2,400,040D 2,400,00000 +l_Cordingency D,00 0.00 0,00 0100 240,000.00 240,000,00 5.Equipment 1 Other 3.0D 0.00 3_00 t).0D D.00 a00 TOTAL COST: 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 3,000,D00.00 3,000,OD0,00 74 V:1.OB.0 Date: 4t2712.1)12 Time:11:36 AM Huntington Beach October,2011 HB -265- Item 7. - 90 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Hun-fingt n Beach !faster Facilities Plan Project Detail Infrastructure: Pork Land Acquishion And Park FaclTdiesDevelopment Project Numb eo Title PK 017 Wamst Dock Renovation And Expansion Suisrnitting Departments: Community Services Project Description: Improve the Edinger Dock area by dredging the area and adding four to six docks or slips. There would also be improements mere to the public boat launch ramp. Justification f Consequences of Avoidance: The area,serves The yacht dub activities as well as casual boaters_ Rel0onship to Genaraf Hart Development: Li le direct relationship,butthe improvements are consistentvirththe City's General Plan Recreation Element arld indirectiy support the additional residents resulting from new development The project is also capacity increasing_ Allocation To General Plan Buildout D.00 e Reference Document Project Timing The project design is planned for 2010 and the construction bet>neen 2010 and 2020. 2015-16 PROPOSED EXPENDITUF ES 2D11-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-16 through Sulltl-out Total all Years 1.Design!Engineering 1 Admirtishatic 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 96,000.00 95,000,00 2.Land Acquisition f Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 640,000.00 640,000.30 5.Equipment/Other 0.00 OM 0.00 0.00 64,000,W 64.0W.Qo TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.OD 0.D0 800,000.0c a00,000.00 75 V.1.06.0 Date; 4/2712012 Tan8:11:35AM Huntington Beach October,2011 Item 7. - 91 HB -266- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Faster Facilities Flan Project Detail Infrastructure_ Park Land Acquisition And Perk Facilities Development ProjectNuntber,Title PK 018 Lam b Pork Design An d Deve lopment Submitting Departments: CommunitySeMees Project Description: Desigm engineer and construct pwk imprm ements an the 2.4 acre Lamb Park site.The improvements would include lighted sports f=]Nes (lo dlfisld and sportsfield)and other neighborhood lbdures such as benches,sidewalks,drinking fountains and a play apparatus onthe parcel, a closed school site. Justiiicetion J Consequences of Avoidance: The park improvements,mostly sports oriented,are necessaryto complete the park and mmdmizethe roughly2A acres avetlinble at this park Relationship to Genera)Plan Development Little direct relationship,but the improvements are consistent with the OVs General Plan recreation Element and'in directly support the additional residents resulting from new development.The project is also capacity increasing, AllncationTo General Plan Buildout 0.01f e Reference Document Project Timing: The project design is planned for N10 andthe construction between 2010 and 2020. 2a15-16 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2D11-12 2012-13 2013.14 2014-15 through Build-out Tow all Years 1.Design/Engineering/Admfnistratic 0.00 O.DO 0.00 0-00 132,0D0.00 t32,000.40 2.Land Acquisition 1 Right Of Way 0.00 D.DD 0.00 O.Dn 0.013 0-DO 3.Construction 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.D4 880,000.D0 880,000.0D 4.Cordingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 D-00 88,000-00 86,000.00 5.Equipment/Other 0.00 S-00 0.00 0.00 0-00 0.00 TOTAL COST. 0.00 0-00 0.00 OM 1,100,000.00 1,100,0Da00 76 V:1,08.0 Date: 4127/2012 Time:11:36 AM Huntington Beech October,2011 HB -267- Item 7. - 92 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Retail Infrastructure: Park Lend Acquisition And Park Facilities Deveoopmeni Project Numb or/Title PK 019 Central Perk Sports Complex Teem RDOm Submitting Departments: Community Services Project Description: Construct a team-room at the sports complex The fdcility would be used bytsarns for during game breaks. The facility would have electrical service and possibly a drinking fountain butwould not indude showerJlocker facilities. Justification j Consequences of Avoidance: The faditywill prmride sports teems with a location forteam discussions.changing and personal effects security. Relationship to General Plan Development Little direct relationship,butthe improvements are consistentwith the MVy General Plan Recreation Element and ind'rrectlysupportihe additional residents resulting from new development. The project is also capacity increasing. Ailocation To General Plan Buildnut 0.00% Reference Document Project Timing: The project design is planned for 2010 and the construction between 2010 and 2020. 2015-15 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2M-14 2014-15 Bwough$ulid-out Total all years 1.Design t Engineering 1 Administratic 0.00 0.00 o.0a 0.00 0.00 D.DD 2,Land Acquisition/Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 o.M 0M D.00 0.00 8-Construction 0,00 O.OD 0.00 0.00 100,000.00 10D,000.00 4.Contingency 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.EquIpmentI Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 MUD 0.00 0,00 TOTAL COST: 0.00 O.DD D,00 0100 t00,00.00 100,000.00 77 V:1.08.0 Date: 4r27M12 Time:11:36 AM Huntington Beach DCcber,2011 Item 7. - 93 xB -268- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Fadlities Plan Project Detail Irkassur#Urs: P%i'K Land Auquisittan Amd Pwk.PAcAltias Development Pro act NumberIT-Itle PK UFO Future ParksAcq:ti f;nrr Possibfe posed Schad Sites) Subrn�tting Depart ncrfW ConhnhuntlyServioes Pro{erx Dascriptio n: ' Ar,p'Te&PprostmfAefy5$wes of;and suitabla icr de slopment of cdrva and passh a parts sur h as including neiobarl=a community and spans parks,Poter4ol s€tus w+auid indude closed school sites. Land acquisition Is esti,Trrated rt$20.00 per square foot or 071,120 per • Ccra. Jasttiication I CCmsegU9npas of A%oiclancP; The City naeds to acquire eppfa4mal-mly 100 apes in orderto meet the GOneml Plan target of 5A acres per 1,M0 resident*, tkatatio n ship to G enerdl Plan€?evelpprnerrt Tlta crfvs General Plan currentty ide„tifies a target of 5.0 acres a#recreation opporwratgs per one thousands residents. AIIawtion To G(3nRrtd Men Bvdldcut, 0,N i Reference Doe4ment: Project Timing: The pMectdesign is pimrtnad for2010 and the con-stiucHon between 201U and 2020 2Ors-ia PROPOSED F?PEl 1p}TJJRZS 2011-12 2m,I a X13-w nill.16 lhwah Ovikkut Total W Yeerx 1.Design I Fry uteeting 1Administratit a.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.ao 2.Land Ao4adflon f Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 5 ,58B4O00,00 59,6di3,Op[r.GO 3.ConstrLicuon 0.00 0-GO 0,00 0.00 D.00 D,f70 4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 5,BquipmentI Other D.00 0,00 0.00 13,00 oleo O,OD TOTAL COST; 0,00 G.aa c.00 o_GD 59,68a.G0o.D0 59,565,000,00 V;1,Da.0 Date: 5/=012 T-mef 11:00 AM Hufntingron Seech October.2011 HB -269- Item 7. - 94 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Infrastructure: Park LandAcquisftion And Park Faciges Development Project Nurnber-j Title PK 021 Central Park Senior Center SubmittingDeparbnents: Commu*services Project Description: CDnmct 45,000 square foot Santnr Center in Central Perfc The ferciiRywould have a large multi-purpose room,a number of smaller dassrorms,awarming kitchert,fitness center,game room with pool tables,and anciflaryoRces_There would also be agarden patio with a water feature,turf and gardens_The faci0ywould have parking for 250 vehicles. Justification j Consequences of Avoidance: The City currently has a de-facto standard of O.t320 square feet or general purpose community use facility space per resident based upon the City's 118,820 square fset of public use facilities availabls to the 180,377 residents.The Cityyvishes to maintain,if not improve,this standard by construction_The 0_E20 square foot per person is not the standard llor senior onlyfacifities,butfor ell community use facirlties availahle to the entire residential population. Relationship to General plan Development The proposed lend-use database indicates additional residential dwellings thetwould likely result in roughly 17,0&9 additional residents requiring at least 10,595 square feet of public use space in order to maintain the existing level of service(LDS) Allocation To General Plan Cuildout 0.[30i Returenea Document: PmjectTirning: The construction offne facility is on-hold pending litigation, 2015-16 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-t2 2012-13 =3-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total a8 Years 1,Design/Engineering IAdnlfrlistratic 0.00 0.00 0_00 0_00 2,200,000,00 2,200,000.00 2.Land ANuisbon/fright Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 3.construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,600,000.00 17,Bt10,000.00 4_Contingency 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,760,000.00 1,700,000,00 5.Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 440,000.00 440,0Mxo TOTAL COST; 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 22,000,000.00 72,a00,000.00 79 V:1.08,0 Date:4/27/2012 Time:11:36 AM Huntington Beach October,2011 Item 7. - 95 HB -270- Exhibit"A" -Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Infrastructure- Park Lend Acquisition And Park Faciftties Development Project Number../Title PK 022 Edison Community Center Gymnasium Submitting Departmerrts_ Community Services Project Description: Construct a7,000 square font gymnasium cotltiguousto the Edson Community Center.The facilllywouldbe a basic"high school'design or grade.with a single main baskethail court that can be proken down into two smalier full-courts or four half-courts for practice sessions. The facilitylaould also have locker rooms and restrooms. Justification J Consequences of Avoidance: Due to higher demands oftheir own,the local high school gymnasiums are no longer as available as they Once were.As a result the City is finding itmore,difficultto mzetthe City'syoulh indoor spnrts needs. Relationship to General Plan Development: The proposed land-use database indicates additional residerrtiel ftt+ellings thatwould likelyresult inroughty 17,089 additional residents requiring at least 10,595 square ieetoi pubficuse space in Orderto maintain the existing level of service(LOS) Allocation To General Plan Sulldout 0.001i Reference Document PrajectTiming: The expansion is pinnned for construction betwearz 2010 and 2020. 2016-16 PROPOSEDEXPEh1DIIIJPES 201-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-16 iMoAhBuild-out Total all Ysam 1.Design I Engineering/Administratic o.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 357,000.00 35700,00 2.Land Acquistion I Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3_Construction 0.00 0.00 0.D0 "0 2,360,OD0.00 2,380,0D0.00 4.Contingency 11.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 238.00D.00 238,000.00 5. Equipment I Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 • 0.00 0.00 O.M TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 D.00 0.00 2,975,000.00 2.975,DDD.00 80 V:1.08.0 Date: 4/2712012 Time;11;30 AM Huntington Reach October,2011 HB -271- Item 7. - 96 Exhibit"A" -Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Fadlities Development RojectNumberiTitle PK 023 MurciyCommunNCenterGymnasium Submitting Departments: Community Services Project Desaipfion: Constructa 7.000 square foot gymnasium contiquous to the MurdyCommunity Center.The frscrlitywould be a basic"high school'design or grade with a single main basketball courtihat can be hrnkEn dawn into two smallerfull-courts or four pelf-courts for practice sessions. The facility would also have locker roams and resireoms. Justification J Consequences of Avoidance: The City currently has a de-facto standard of 0.620 square feet or general purpose community use facility space per resident based upon the Cites 118,820 square feet of public use fadlities available to the 190,377 residents.The City> shes to maintain,if nat improve,this standard by constructson_The 0.620 square foot per person is not the standard for senior orlyfacilifies,butfor all community use facjities available to the enure residential population. Relationship to General Plan Development: I he proposed land-use database indimos additional residential dwellings that would likely result in roug 4y 17,089 additional residents requiring at least 10.595 square feel of public use space in order to maintain the wdsting level of service(LOS) Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 9.00% Reference Document: Project Timing: The expansion is planned for construction between 2010 and 2020• M5-16 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 20i1-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 thnughBtMd-out Total all Team 1.Design/Engsneerfng i Admirustratic o.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 361,000.00 357,000.00 2.Land Acquistion J Right Of way 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 3.Construction 0,00 0_00 0.00 0.00 2,3e0,000.00 2,380,000.00 4.t;ontingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 238,000.00 238,000.00 S.Equipment/Other 0.00 0.04 0,00 0.00 0.00 0100 TOTAL COST. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,975%000.00 2,875,000.00 V_1.00.0 Date, 4J27/2012 Time:11:39 AM Huntington Beach October,2011 Item 7. - 97 HB -272- Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Fac lilies Development ProjectNumber]Tllle PK 024 Oak ViiewRecreation Center 5pansion Submitting Departments: Community Services Project Description Construct a roughly Z000 square foot expansion to the existing 10,000 squsrs fool OatcViet%v recreation Community Canter. The facility would consist of a game room,multi-purpose room and arestroom. Justification J Consequences of Avoidance. The facdityis necessary(or planned)to moximizethe fairly small facility. Relationship to General Plan Development: The proposed land-use dot abase indicates additional residenlial dwellings theMould likely result in roughly 17.089 additional residents requiring at least 10,5S5 square feet of public use spate in order to maintain the exssting level of service(LOS) Allocation To General Pfan Buildout 0.001 Reference Document ProjectTrming: The expansion is planned for eonstructi2n between 20111 and 2020. 2015-16 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013.14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years 1.Design/Engineering/Administrate 0.00 0.00 D.DO o_DO 6o,000.00 80,OW.00 2.Land Acquistion 1 Right Of Way 0.0a MD 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.Construction 0.00 O.DO 0.0a 0.00 64O,OD0.00. 640,0D0,00 4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 D.OD 64,OD0.00 64,000.D0 5.Equlprnent/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,000.00 16,000.00 TOTAL GOST: 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 80D D00.00 W0,000.00 82 V_1.08.0 Date: 412712012 Tune: 5:26 PM Huntington Beach October,2011 HB -273- Item 7. - 98 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-66 End of Plan 83 Item 7. - 99 HB -274- Res. No. 2012-66 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, JOAN L. FLYNN the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council at a Regular meeting thereof held on October 01, 2012 by the following vote: AYES: Shaw, Harper, Dwyer, Hansen, Carchio, Bohr, Boardman NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None CitVXlerk and ex-officio erk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California ATTACHMENT #6 �. City of Huaiangton $each:P.lannrng.aiid BuiId�ng3epartment STAFF: REPORT "M,1.70W REACH TO: Planning Commission FROM: Scott Hess,AZCP,Director of Planning and Building BY: Ricky Ramos, Senior Planner DATE: August 14,2012 SUBJECT: ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 12-02 (PARK IN LIEU FEE---CONTINUED FROM JULY 247 2012 WITH PUBLIC HEARING TO BE OPENED) APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 PROPERTY OWNER: Not applicable LOCATION: Citywide STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Zoning Text Amendment(ZTA)No. 12-02 request: - Amend Chapter 254 (Dedications and Reservations) of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (HBZSO) to delete the site-specific-appraisal approach for determining park in lieu fees for residential projects that require tentative maps and replace it with standard citywide fees and incorporate other related changes; and - Delete Section 230.20 of the HBZSO pertaining to park fees for projects not requiring a tentative map. a Staff s Recommendation: Approve ZTA No. 12-02 based upon the following: - It will allow the City to collect park in lieu fees as necessary to acquire and/or improve park and recreational facilities throughout the City to meet the needs of residents consistent with the General Plan,the October 2011 Master Facilities Plan, and Development Impact Fee (DIF) Calculation and Nexus Report(Amended April 2012). - It will result in equitable standard citywide park fees for rental and for-sale residential units. - It-rill help developers determine development costs earlier in the process. - It is consistent with General Plan goals,objectives, and policies. RECOMMENDATION: Motion to: "Approve Zoning Text Amendment No. 12-02 with findings (Attachment No. 1) and forward the draft ordinance(Attachment No. 2)to the City Council for adoption." Item 7. - 101 HB -276- �R_j ALTERNATIVE ACTIONN: The Planning Commission may take alternative actions such as: A. "Approve Zoning Text Amendment No. 12-02 with modifications and forward the modified draft ordinance to the City Council for adoption_" B. "Continue Zoning Text Amendment No. 12-02 and direct staff accordingly_" C. "Deny Zoning Text Amendment No. 12-02 with findings for denial." PROJECT PROPOSAL: ZTA No. 12-02 is a request by the City pursuant to Chapter 247 of the HBZSO to: 1) amend Chapter 254 (Dedications and Reservations)of the HBZSO to delete the site-specific-appraisal approach for determining park in lieu fees for residential projects that require tentative maps and replace it with standard citywide fees and incorporate other related changes;and 2) delete Section 230.20 of the HBZSO pertaining to park fees for projects not requiring a tentative map. In order to facilitate review of ZTA No. 12-02, staff has prepared a legislative draft outlining the proposed amendments (Attachment 3)which include: 1. Deleting Section.230.20 which is now incorporated in the Municipal Code; 2. Amending Section 254.08(D)(1)to delete reference to appraising land to determine in lieu fee; 3. Amending Sections 254.08(G)(1) and (2) to reflect that park in lieu fees will be based on a fee schedule adopted by City Council instead of the current site-specific-appraisal approach; 4. Amending Sections 254.08(H)(1) and (2) to reflect that any required park land dedication shall be a credit toward the payment of park in lieu fees at the park land acquisition and development cost per acre used to develop the in lieu fee; 5. Amending Section 254.08(D to: a_ Include a land acquisition cost adjustment challenge allowing a developer to object to the park land acquisition cost per acre used to develop the in lieu fee adopted by City Council and also give the City the ability to increase in lieu fees where the fair market value of land exceeds the park land acquisition cost per acre; b. Update the qualifications of a Qualified Real Estate Appraiser; c. Delete provision for Director-determination of fair market value of property for small subdivisions of three or fewer parcels; and 6. Amending Section 254.08(L) to allow payment of in lieu fees prior to final building permit approval instead of at map recordation. 7. Deleting Section 254.08(0)(2) which exempts the subdivision of a 50 foot wide parcel into two lots if held under common ownership for a minimum of five consecutive years. Background: On June 18, 2012 the City Council approved modifications to development impact fees (DIF). The approval included changing park fees for residential developments that do not require a tentative map (typically rental units) from $.86 per square foot to a standard citywide per unit fee. Part of the PC Staff Report—8/14/12 HB -277- (12SF25ttgm7.,- 102 implementation of the modified DIFs involves the proposed amendments to HBZSO Chapter 254 and deletion of Section 230.20 which will now be incorporated in the Municipal Code. Chapter 254 only applies to residential projects that require tentative maps. It previously included a methodology that resulted in a citywide standard per unit park in lieu fee by using a citywide average per acre land value in the calculation. However, in 2002 the City amended Chapter 254 to require site- specific appraisals to ensure that current land values are utilized when calculating park in lieu fees. With ZTA No. 12-02, Chapter 254 will once again incorporate a citywide standard per unit park in lieu fee comparable to the fee approved by City Council for projects that do not have tentative maps. The new proposed standard park in lieu fee for ownership units is anticipated to be lower than if a site-specific- appraisal approach were used and is subject to City Council approval by resolution. Study Session: The request was presented to the Planning Commission for study session on May 15, 2012. There were no questions raised that requires further follow up by staff. ISSUES: SubiectProyertyAnd Surrounding Land Use,Zoning And General Plan Designations: ZTA No. 12-02 is applicable citywide. General Plan Conformance: The proposed ZTA is consistent with the goals, objectives,and policies of the City's General Plan as follows: A. Land Use Element Goal L U 2: Ensure that development is adequately served by transportation infrastructure, utility infrastructure, and public services. Obiective LU14.1: Preserve and acquire open spaces for the City's existing and future residents that provide,maintain, and protect significant environmental resources,recreational opportunities, and visual relief from development. Policy LU 14.1.2 Permit the acquisition and/or dedication of lands for new open space purposes in any land use zone where they complement and are compatible with adjacent land uses and development, contingent on City review and approval. Policy L U 14.1.4: Provide for the acquisition and development of the City's parks in accordance with the Parks and Recreation Element of the General Plan B. Recreation and Communio;Services Element Item 7. - 103,,t-8n4n2 HB -278 - (I2SR25,ZTA 12-02) Goal RCS 2: Provide adequately sized and located active and passive parklands to meet the recreational needs of existing and future residents,and to preserve natural resources within the City of Huntington Beach and its sphere of influence. Policy RCS 2.1.1: Maintain the current park per capita ratio of 5.0 acres per 1,000 persons, which includes the beach in the calculation. Policy RCS 8.1.S: Update,on a periodic basis,the park in lieu fee assessed to all new development. C. Environmental ResourceslConservation Element Goal ERC 1: Improve and enhance the overall aesthetic value and appearance of the City of Huntington Beach through the provision and maintenance of local public and private open space. The revised ordinance will allow the City to collect park in lieu fees as necessary to acquire and/or improve park and recreational facilities throughout the City to meet the needs of residents consistent with the General Plan and the October 2011 Master Facilities Plan and DIF Calculation and Nexus Report(Amended April 2012). It will result in more equitable standard citywide park fees for rental and for-sale residential units. It will help developers determine the development costs earlier in the process. Zoning Compliance: Not applicable. Urban Desizri Guidelines Conformance: Not applicable. Environmental Status: ZTA No. 12-02 is categorically exempt pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 4501, Class 20, which supplements the California Environmental Quality Act because the request is an amendment to a zoning ordinance that does not change the development standards intensity or density. Coastal Status: The proposed amendment will be combined with other minor amendments that will be forwarded to the California Coastal Commission as a minor Local Coastal Program Amendment for certification. Redevelopment Status: Not applicable. Design Review Board: Not applicable. Subdivision Committee: Not applicable. Other Departments Concerns and Requirements: The proposed amendments to the City's existing ordinance were prepared with input from the City Attorney's Office and the Community Services Department. Public Notification: Legal notice was published in the Huntington Beach/Fountain Valley Independent on July 12, 2012 and notices were sent to individuals/organizations requesting notification(Planning and PC Staff Report-8/14/12 HB.-279- (12SR25Item 7.,- 104 Building Department's Notification Matrix)and the development community. As of August 7, 2012, no communications regarding the request have been received. Application Processing Dates: DATE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE(S): January 9, 2012 Legislative Action-Not Applicable ANALYSIS: The primary planning issue related to the request pertains to determining the appropriate methodology for calculating park in lieu fees for residential projects that require tentative maps (i.e. site-specific appraisal or standard citywide fees adopted by City Council). The following analysis addresses this issue and the major revisions to the ordinance. Methodology The intent of the proposed amendments to Chapter 254 of the HBZSO is to apply the same standard citywide park in lieu fees for each unit type (detached, attached, and mobile home) whether it is a rental or for-sale unit. This is being accomplished by deleting the current site-specific-appraisal approach in Chapter 254 and replacing it with the same standard citywide park in lieu fees recently approved by City Council recently for 'rental units. Currently, rental units pay signi.ficautly less in park fees than for-sale units that require tentative maps. Approval of ZTA No. 12-002 coupled with City Council's recent actions will result in equitable standard citywide park fees for both rental and for-sale residential units. Furthermore, compared to a site-specific-appraisal approach, a standard citywide fee will help developers determine development costs earlier in the process. In addition, the current site-specific-appraisal approach has resulted in developers challenging the City on site-specific appraisals. The revised ordinance will allow the City to collect park in lieu fees as necessary to acquire and/or improve park and recreational facilities throughout the City to meet the needs of residents consistent with the General Plan and the October 2011 Master Facilities Plan and DIF Calculation and Nexus Report (Amended April 2012)and in consideration of maximizing the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan Based on the reasons above, staff supports the ZTA. Credit for Partial Dedication The ZTA incorporates a new method for addressing partial land dedication under Section 254.08(H). Under the current code, if partial dedication is given, a park in lieu fee to be paid by the developer for the balance of the required dedication is calculated using a site-specific appraisal. Since the site-specific- appraisal approach is proposed to be deleted partial dedications are proposed to be given credit toward the payment of in lieu fees at the park land acquisition and development cost per acre used to develop the park in lieu fee. Staff believes that this is an appropriate method for dealing with partial dedications under the new system of standard citywide fees. Item 7. - 105ort_$n4�12 HB -280- . t (12SR25 ZTA I2-02) Land Acquisition Cost Adjustment Challenge The ZTA will add a provision in Chapter 254 for land acquisition cost challenge as noted in the DIF Calculation and Nexus Report (Amended April 2012). This provides a process for a developer to object to the park land acquisition cost of$871,200 per acre used to develop the park in lieu fee. The process requires the developer to pay for an appraisal of the property to be developed to determine if the fair market value of the land is less than$871,200 per acre. Conversely,the City retains the ability to increase the in lieu fee in areas where the fair market value of land exceeds $871,200 per acre. Staff believes it is important to include this provision to give developers due process. Timing of Fee Payment The ZTA will allow payment of park in lieu fees prior to final building permit approval as noted in Section 254.08(L) instead of at recordation of the final map. This change is recommended because it is consistent with the Quimby Act and is appropriate given that the impacts for park facilities will not occur until the final building permit approval and occupancy of the unit. Deletion of Exemption for 50 Foot Wide Parcels The last notable change proposed is the deletion of the exemption from payment of Quimby Fees for subdivision of a 50 foot wide parcel into two lots provided that the parcel has been held under common ownership for a minimum of five consecutive years. This exemption was included when the City amended the code to require site-specific appraisals to protect property owners downtown that want to subdivide their 50 foot wide parcels into two from the significant increase in park fees resulting from the site-specific appraisals. Now that a standard citywide park fee is contemplated, the exemption is no longer needed. SUMMARY: Staff"s Recommendation: Approve Zoning Text Amendment No_ 12-02 based upon the following: • It will allow the City to collect park in lieu fees as necessary to acquire and/or improve park and recreational facilities throughout the City to meet the needs of residents consistent with the General Plan and the October 2011 Master Facilities Plan and DIF Calculation and Nexus Report (Amended April 2012). ■ It will result in equitable standard citywide park fees for rental and for-sale residential units. ■ It will help developers determine development costs earlier in the process. • It is consistent with General Plan goals, objectives, and policies. st . . 2 SH:HF:RR PC staff Report-8n4/12 1413 -281- (12SR25 Item 7.1- 106 ATTACHMENT #7 ..................... Al "IM MAIR Ov a. rykLl,11,1111.......... . ............. All RE Sato, ... ....... 2, --,,� PARK I F LIE, MW .......... AN All I In ul ��` ✓;ash � kf, ���.,;,, n,,�,� \.E����. :,ilk/ ••� ,�; v,> .�;:;".%>R�\r, i7 fr `� '' a.��,.<,. \.,.: R y�>;r ' tea. F� L d .¢ /l �a. i s ss, IN ".<,a_., 6'v ,. ,,.,�<.., ,,,, ,.,,v/ �::•` ', ...era .. „' �,.�C..�..._.<.t 3i'' ,,, ,.�:,. ,"' .�.�.., dr., .-ate ....y�<� �:,`�., ,�" ,.,� •'>� Via• .a.<,,. ��, �Z ,;�'%r zYay,"<j'. '�r .:.. ,,, �"•;��tt?•,1 s " f� f. ryl zc g. • c`t :a',`�r• ^,/,�iub.'%'; eat '�\ a y" l; R AW C' �l�a> tl .'F.:r "or" t tea. �' l4b fz sry /sii Z,� } y a of t t l�a �t ..:, ��'�� ;,.��,`>•*;�'.n'^` :w. s :a.: �� n n<m u, � A , h r .s �fe r ,~ e a�Sal a rO:aCh t fog de .r /y lie .s 4: # i a i ti 1 e > r rq$identor r0 . ,w a a,x e� s� � r ,r � �s > may' . •':.• ..,� ...,; F,�� " > ' =` .r a rt d6- r 1fr a e ace. i with Stv n r aA ra drt " rd fees` :yv a� p Y' ,.: > �' �. aka cr Orate r hWINIP! ! >a, W Ot er related..�cha , Ic ar ANr �/ r. ".,, ' . 5 <'::,- gig:l y;. p �, jig e e �Z el ................ t eycti0� 23 02 f��t arr�� �y 0 Oho h C y > ark fee for r s, projects� not r uirin a tentatirr p p q m g , ate,. s: r �v � cOr aa Ora ih the u it al ey , I I ez. `£`3*i ,:"'IF .. ;� > For, /J." N®R,/ / 'W v. a{%a :1 y /D / r „ / r H � e /G \ \ r /a^ /.a, > s y. y \ y ..a�:�• may.,', \. „n, c, r. / \ y i / a' T. i• i G , i e, park in n y r s, \ sr / O z9 / v � ,EN �..,.;, , r'• 2*111", j r, r in, t dd�t n -l; fee f t d r. < t . InRi, IF yi - .,;;. .,. sac•..;•, n; ,. ✓- .. „/�,.:.-';;ice. .;, ,. ,:,w ; ,. r vemen t x", In r Pro :<, ':x:®'urr�..�•-�ii ,,,.a;, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, t�. / .�\ ., its rtrl did � t for r n Y b k' N :\. / / v \ i „ ma »F"ai a li uiiti on ;cost chi � on for/r. park i rr■ rf �'•' " ■nab ait f foo�.•� a m ,� �, ^'•ice�:Z� pe rm it 9 royal end a%a� <';�::� Gam;.: •�`.," -' u f t vv� e ir�oln » \�.� l t o � tsor� for" p -,MIN 101 41 <^' ,y \ �i.��'\'' ; , ,, ;a-;';.% " ,;ant\\\•:,,,„ i ...... Pg' rvva a,p., 'On "a G' r ., s` w �z. ��\ •,,r' ,N� // �'z,��, �r �/,., � ,� z-' iv`Tk, i ',a kr, v,o/' 'ngfr' \ d.3' I L Vic- s Awl' • a., ,, yr' r;% ;;' s I�aaa 1, �ry Q/ x" n's a.. I' a era nu er personsNol x _ H j, ilr Ok. . h 11 _ �8 3 a s'...- n. f N; r. %;mow��..r: ,%;� .a r°� c. s• Js, r� �+ p 1`:f rrk v�� a a ✓ c , tea, a7J� �0. a�.. a:��i 0 f ! I,�.+D...G`�.�..c M ,' P" y� >` "T r 10 , crad�� partial �rk��la d�a r _i,,J ,ran .ry d cat. u, . .., . n..,. 5 r� r, k,. I d gad r0n DIF calculate w5: r? , :: o and axes Fie orb 3 ;,,4 !aw x_(A � dp riI 2012 41 ..................... "*a. r r, g MA, A, a''• ................ .......... ✓ M fiopqp v. sm 4, I I 'Urrerit d1n -e 7 Un �W 85 IM M"KEIRI, qQ, a 011 Land .CU 5e TO lilt"1171`1`7 wellifirm A ed D ll z 11 OR -00 LHam:.. Jr r ",","WWW" 0, iWMI m n er ; ,�Hb 6,Uwe I t 01- 9 1 . ................. b 1L neralpal N N/A oil N K 41: j" M/Ak Al ............................... .................. his! •,;�'-..-s' s :'sae,,.r ;,'J=; \'fir`... ,' �.• t N�. r. ':.�mil, it»;,`; "Y %s/: ,6✓ems, s�>�" �.fi% t�i'".,• „� a`'. �* „it 1�:':. ;.,' ".:,.:; ";. ';„:,�<�ir' y ,„ ,j/, .' , : �� ' ....•v 2.� S\o'��.;r,y;.;rr�,�.q.•3a'.,�a,;,,, W; r �< �.w .. / y r / .h�■/fir i „r ss' icil in. Jit � , r ,„ N�p� MA, ' r", 17 „ ', . , ro t¢ s, ; -12 'O-'' :y:. .. .,4t• '.ice.. `'+"��;� .�'y;,,F��r. "�:o�.'�`r' :vl�:.� n. alcuat�ons h F.. xON Via,v„ s ,s s IMP , ,r--<; , ' •'i%ice/"';<- , -r >,• ,:,,,, '� .. ,., FF s'.aa e 0". , urre.� rd;lna�Ce _. • :.<. :, e F'ar ;°Dedication 50~units x 2:68 residents/unit /AR 5 `:,^ r e; _ - baJ 7 Ofit 0.6 acres .Y x i Fee: 0. 7 �acresX 1 500 000/acre a °sisal V I _ 1` i. wxxr ' �- e OF!, IF < i 00/0nit.. , .5 ,; . T Me v v "� � r �� �' _,. „��y:��., ,., „bra(;,,"� �•� ah "� a " e'd 0 d nance e uni — „r F'e 5o is x 17 857/unitr 892 850 ,\ gnv " NE � J 41 amw / oa• .:; r' \��r r , � . y ,:2' _ ,� rA A ��,. /�Ppl, veu-umn: P " 75 tee' s r,,,f&;/, a I n .......... -111111-lo/......... M's WO n r;p-, WE or, e,,os, pe .......... . ....... n ct r fees�� fir -Fn �a i )a 'o vqomap, --units)-increased., rental I 'T M,R 64P �m - ' inCO DO a comp Wi ;2, 4 r rate' A �2--4� "'TA t 4e, rable dity� Sw, M-7 fee, for for"sale unit-t-,,. .......(WI-RIo nd uunit pirk No- j ..................3 . ........... 14 j,& 1*01, Afid' 4all 111101-'R ........... % .......... gypr. gy WW �,n.rya- ........... 1A A OMell IS Ent 0 ffP C I' .nMgt, 0 kse ......... ........... 49, Aue n Ox-'r-nt wum ,m ei Phil ill 1:1111 hSts 15 nor pw- . ...... ........... rd Ar U stn' eIq b, I f ia e sta n d apark.-� b'es __-ore r��iai,­ um 41' AW111 vj��a e n. i a u N S. EMS" rmine,s.�- ,,,ev o p ers costs"I" rher,det �K',"161� k111TWN1 li7k�,R, 7W.". "05"14 -;' e"I 11A F....................... ............ F. .I I I .........I .............. 3. PR Sit- smut, 91"i 71, ............ .......... "BARB .............;� esn ............ JA fr �,l........... i W, 7� TIM Fr 31-,V1.1 ML,,� 21 2 los A iff �W, kz 4/ O 'om ' N 'wr , w om, T, aaa 31 & _t VF MOM Ally M T, § "i"Zol M '51 NO '001 a a m W ................. .............. 101 Via, E WN r ,le TE X IT, TI v a E WO IR a IMP low, 's g`y5 �,R........... 11 TTIll" 5/0, k 0 W- 'All /0 ,10 ik ­N_ OP "OF ............... T NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday, October 1, 2012, at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following planning and zoning items: ❑ 1. ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 12-002 (PARK IN LIEU FEE) Applicant: City of Huntington Beach Property Owner: Not Applicable Request: To: 1) amend Chapter 254 (Dedications and Reservations) of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (HBZSO) to delete the site-specific-appraisal approach for determining park in lieu fees for residential projects that require tentative maps and replace it with standard citywide fees and incorporate other related changes; and 2) delete Section 230.20 of the HBZSO pertaining to park fees for projects not requiring a tentative map. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Zoning Text Amendment at their meeting on August 14, 2012. The City Council will also consider the adoption of a resolution establishing park land dedication fees, average number of persons per dwelling for residential subdivisions, and park land acquisition and development costs per acre used to credit partial park land dedication. Location: Citywide Project Planner: Ricky Ramos 1. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item #1 is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. 2. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item #1 will require a Local Coastal Program Amendment certified by the California Coastal Commission. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Planning and Building Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office on Thursday, September 27, 2012. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning and Building Department at (714) 536-5271 and refer to the above items. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 714-536-5227 http://huntingtonbeachca.gov/HBPublicComments/ CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST FORM MEETING DATE: SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT: FL-#NNIt4C-A P,4D CONTACT NAME: PHONE: 53ts, ' �c°a�- N/A YES NO Is the notice attached? Do the heading and closing of the notice reflect a hearing before the City Council and/or Redevelopment Agency? Are the date, day and time of the public hearing correct? (V) ( ) ( ) If an appeal, is the appellant's name included in the notice? (v) ( ) ( ) If Coastal Development Permit, does the notice include appeal language? Is there an Environmental Status to be approved by Council? Is a map attached for publication? ( ) ( ) (✓) Is a larger ad required? Size Is the verification statement attached indicating the source and accuracy of the mailing list? t r or ( ) ( ) (Vj Are the applicant's name and address part of the mailing labels?,�t-r,< Are the appellant's name and address part of the mailing labels? A4-?u co4w-t- (✓} ( ) ( ) If Coastal Development Permit, is the Coastal Commission part of the mailing labels? If Coastal Development Permit, are the resident labels attached? (vj ( ) ( ) Is Summary Report 33433 attached? (Redevelopment Agency items only) What is the minimum number of days from publication to hearing date? t C> What is the minimum number of times to be published? 0t4t- What is the specified number of days between publications? FOR ADMINISTRATION AND CITY CLERK USE ONLY Approved for public hearing Date noticed to newspaper Date published Date notices mailed 091-8/09 G5o faany pane algliedwoo ww�q x ww 5i;iewaoi ap;Ilan bp] 0918/0915o faany Ulinn algliedwoo„g/5 Z x„j ozls lagei Jim Ivory Pat Helgeson DCO Beach Walk LLC Sares-Regis Group Province Group 1745 Shea Center Drive, Suite 200 18825 Bardeen Avenue 1601 Dove Street, Suite 250 Highlands Ranch, CO 80129 Irvine, CA 92612 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Jerry Moffatt Josie McKinley Jerry Wheeler Rainbow Environmental Services Poseidon Resources HB Chamber of Commerce 17121 Nichols Street 17011 Beach Blvd,#900 2134 Main Street, Suite 100 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Brian Starr % Dave Stefanides President Building Industry Assoc. of So. Calif. Orange County Assoc. of Realtors Huntington Beach Tomorrow 17744 Sky Park Circle, Suite 170 25552 La Paz Road PO Box 865 Irvine, CA 92614 Laguna Hills, CA 92553 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 • I Ben Brosseau Consulting, Inc. David J. Nagel Thomas E. Schiff 15149 Camarillo Street Decron Properties j Decron Properties Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 6222 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 400 6222 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 400 j Los Angeles, CA 90048 Los Angeles, CA 90048 Ryan Mordahl Morrie Golcheh i Steve Sheldon Global Premier Development, Inc. Progressive Real Estate Sheldon Group Consulting 2010 Main Street, Suite 1250 10537 Santa Monica Blvd, Suite 350 901 Dove Street, Suite 140 Irvine, CA 92614 Los Angeles, CA 90025 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Thomas G. Grable Jeff Rulon Raymond Dorame Tri Point Homes, LLC Christopher Homes Master Craft Homes Group 20201 SW Birch St., Suite 100 19 Corporate Plaza Drive 1401 Quail Street, Suite 100 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Jeff Bergsma Robert Reid Michael Adams Team Design 7572 Warner Avenue Michael Adams Associates 221 Main Street, Suite S Huntington Beach, CA 92647 21190 Beach Boulevard Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Janette T. Ditkowsky Huntington beach No. 1 Chaim Elkoby Freeway Industrial Park 2716 Ocean Park Blvd., Suite 3040 Crescent Heights 2032 La Colina Drive Santa Monica, CA 90405 2200 Biscayne Blvd. Santa Ana, CA 92705 Miami, FL 33137 1 Becky Sullivan Mark Faulkner Alex Wong DJM Development Partners Grey Star Development Red Oak Investments 922 Laguna Street 2139 Meriweather Court 2101 Business Center Drive, Suite 230 Santa Barbara, CA 93101 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Irvine, CA 92612 Sarah Klaustermeier Bijan Sassounian John Trommald Archstone Beach Promenade Bayview HB, LLC 3 MacArthur Place, Suite 600 21190 Beach Boulevard 13912 Seal Beach Boulevard Santa Ana, CA 92707 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Seal Beach, CA, 90740 1 , �')•1 _0 D v label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery°5160/8160 /O tiniiottn rin fnrmnt 9F mm v A7 mm rmmnitihlo nktor Avary©MRr1/AlArl ` 0918/09 i90 Aaany oane algl}edwoo ww Lg x ww 5Z jewao;op a:panbll3 t-Z2-1 z-oo 09 L8/091go Aaany ql!m alggedwoo„9/g Z x„G azls lapel 2-0f--7] Joe Diachendt Milad Queijan Shawn Millbern 300 Pacific Coast Highway,#119 8031 Main Street, Unit B 8951 Research Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Stanton, CA 96680 Irvine, CA 92618 Todd Schmieder Martin Potts David Oddo 701 N. Parkcenter Drive MPA, Inc. 815 Main Street Santa Ana, CA 92705 4041 MacArthur Boulevard, Suite 375 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Rick Polhamus Dick Harlow Rick Hill 19802 Sea Canyon Circle 1742 Main Street Urban Infill Properties, Inc. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ! Huntington Beach, CA 92648 345 University Drive, Suite E-3 Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Christopher Homes, Inc. John Vander Velde j Holly Fredensburg 23 Corporate Plaza Dr,Suite 246 Shea Homes 16072 Gothard St Newport Beach, CA 92660 1250 Corona Pointe Ct., Suite 600 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Corona, CA 92879 Dave Oddo Robert Corona Van Herk 815 Main Street 2204 Pacific Coast Highway 3194 Haiti Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 it Bruce Roeland Scott Goodman Myles Const 1720 Pacific Coast Highway#201 Goodman Development ! 9569 Albacore Ave Huntington Beach, CA 92648 17032 Palmdale Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Maddox Const D'Ambra Kevin Kelter Maddox Const D'Ambra Inc. 1616 Pacific Coast Highway 14736 Beach Blvd 7752 Warner Ave Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Westminster, CA 92683 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Bob Reed ' Marty Sunday Johnson Bros RW Reed 16402 Gothard St#B . 730 14th Street 419 Main Street#289 i Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 8 Bill Teffon RJ Murphy ETI: Corral 100 2233 Calle Leon 6781 Defiance Drive Jean Kimbrell West Covina, CA 91792 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 20292 Eastwood Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92646 9 12 13 Environmental Board Chair Rutan &Tucker, LLP Newland House Museum Robert Smith Jeffrey M. Oderman i Pres., H.B. Historical Society 21352 Yarmouth Lane 611 Anton Blvd., 14th Floor 19820 Beach Blvd. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Costa Mesa, CA 92626-1950 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 �Ty� /�_O O label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 x>*# 7 4 Ftimiatta HP,fnrmat 95 mm Y F7 mm rmmnatihle aver.Avary 05160/8160 to 0918/0915®f19A oaAu aIqIl�duoo uu Lg x uu 5Z fawao}ap a�anb}� Naml2—vo a , 0018/09 Gge naaAV yflNA algljadwoo„8/5 Z x„I,azls lagel 3 �r0 3 14 25 25 Historic Resources Board Chair California Coastal Commission California Coastal Commission Barbara Haynes Theresa Henry South Coast Area Office 19341 Worchester Lane South Coast Area Office 200 Oceangate, 10th Floor Huntington Beach, CA 92646 200 Oceangate, 10th Floor Long Beach, CA 92802-4302 Long Beach, CA 92802-4302 26 40 Department of Transportation, Dist. 12 Hearthside Homes Christopher Herre, Branch Chief 6 Executive Circle, Suite 250 3337 Michelson Dr., Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92614 Irvine, CA 92612-1699 ,f i /'��J�]ly label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery e5160/8160 OR, /� VV!/liin-++n Ao fnrmn+9G mm v F n 7 mm nmm�atihlo awm Awnrw©riFNRirn Printed by-0602 Patricia Gamino 3ep.73,2012 2.41 pm Salewirson: Phone. Ad 111351674811 iPt-t-o�Pe I �_A:cc..ct-�rnt�tiorm_e�ti onf � - o !tle dd020-12- 227 i 3_ 340{714}536 Sa f"NT amei; Ci Of Huntington Beach Parent tf5 daftt 09-20-12 d b3 13.00 TCN Inch tY g (Parent) ..Rsktress PO Box 784 i 1nseltloris 1 Keywvrclt Huntington Beac,CA 92648 OWE cii&&Legal Huntington Beach iner Takant)y: 0602 Patricia Gamtna �� 4,� z CIe 13000-Legal Notices G pi3ce, $104.00 6 Puts g TCN HBI 1@. $104.00 15- Gllent City Of Huntington Beach-Clerks© �A � $104,Ofl LLf?i>�Iced tij J Patty Esparza FBtbt ;(714)374-1557 � tots �a tCi i�t Ddi, ruble t0,71 �t►i Ad Copy: IOTIa OF PUBU(HEWN6 BEFORE THE WY tOUNQ OF THE CITY Of HNIN6TON BEAN NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday, October 1,2012,at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following planning and zoning items: ❑ 1. ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 12- 00E(PARK IN LIEU FEE) Applicant: City of Huntington Beach Property Owner: Not Applicable Request- To: 1) amend Chapter 254 (Dedications and Res- ervations) of the Hun- tington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordi- nance(HBZSO)to delete the site-specific-ap- praisal approach for determining park in lieu fees for residential projects that require tentative maps and replace it with standard citywide fees and in- corporate other related changes; and 2) delete Section 230.20 of the HBZSO pertaining to park fees for projects not requiring a tentative map. The Planning Commission recom- mended approval of the Zoning Text Amendment at their meeting on August 14, 2012, The City Council will also consider the adoption of a resolution establishing park land dedication fees, average number of persons per dwelling for residential subdivisions. and park land acquisi- tion and development costs per acre used to credit partial park land --- ad proof pg.1 --- ��'� I`! Printed by:�0602PatriciaGaminoµY��V__.W������NSep 13,2012,2:41 pm�k _ Phone: Ad#35187481 e �,,a'sash.tam, .xc+ea:wx�s..v»matt,•..4,�3�.•• — __._. ••. µpaXk ±'�`•. dedic atio n. Location: Citywide Project Planner: Ricky Ramos 1.NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item #1 is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environ- mental Quality Act. 2.NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item #1 will require a Local Coastal Program Amendment certified by the Califor- nia Coastal Commission. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Planning and Building Department, 2000 Main Street, Hun- tington Beach,California 92648, for inspection by the public.A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office on Thursday,September 27, 2012. ALL INTERESTED PER- SONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above.If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence deliv- ered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing.if there are any further questions please call the Planning and Building Department at (714) 536-5271 and refer to the above items. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk Joan L.Flynn,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street,2nd Floor Huntington Beach,Cali- fornia 92648 714-536-5227 http_// huntingtonbeachca.gov/ HBPublicComments/ Published H.B.Indepen- dent 9/20/12 _ v _._ ad proof pg.2 --- PROOFOF PUBLICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ---- _- ❑ 1. ZONING TEXT 1.NOTICE IS HEREBY Building Department AMENDMENT NO. 12- GIVEN that Item #1 is (714) 536-5271 and n 002(PARK IN LIEU FEE) categorically exempt fee to the above item: am a citizen of the United States and a I Applicant: City of Hun- from the provisions of Direct youF- viritte tington Beach Property the California Environ- communications to th resident of the County of Los Angeles; I Owner: Not Applicable mental Quality Act: City Clerk Request: To: 1) amend 2.NOTICE IS .HEREBY Joan L.Flynn,City Clerl am over the age of eighteen years, and 1 Chapter 254 (Dedica- GIVEN that Item #1 will City of Huntington Itions and Reservations), require a Local Coastal' ! Beach not a party to or interested in the notice of the Huntington Beach Program Amendment 2000 Main Street,2nd I Zoning and Subdivision certified by-the Califor- ' Floor published. I am a principal clerk of the I Ordinance (HBZSO) to nia Coastal Commission. Huntington Beach, HUNTINGTON BEACH delete the site-specific- ON FILE: A copy of the California92648 appraisal- approach for proposed request is on 714-536-5227 determining park in lieu tile in the Planning and http:// INDEPENDENT, which was adjudged a fees for residential Building Department, huntingtonbeachca.gov, projects that require 2000 Main Street, Hun- HBPublicComments/ newspaper of general circulation on tentative maps and re- tington Beach, Califor- Published H:B. Indepen place it with standard nia 92648, for inspec- dent 9/20/12- September 29, 1961, case A6214, and citywide fees and incor- tion -by the public. A 'porate other related copy of the staff report, June 11, 1963, case A24831, for the changes; and 2) delete will be available to in Section 230.20 of the terested parties at the City of Huntington Beach, County of HBZSO pertaining to City Clerk's Office on ,park fees for projects .Thursday, September Orange, and the State of California. net requiring a tentative ,27,2012. map.The Planning Com- ALL INTERESTED PER- Attached to this Affidavit is a true and mission recommended SONS are invited to at approval of the Zoning tend said hearing and complete copy as was printed and Text Amendment at express opinions or then'meeting on August submit evidence for or published on the following date(s): _ 14, 2012. The City against the application Council will also consid- as outlined above. If NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING er the adoption of a you challenge the City Thursday September 20 2012 resolution establishing court, -you action in > > BEFORE park. land dedication court, -you may be OF THE fees'average number of limited to raising.only persons per dwelling for those issues you or CITY OFHUNTINGTON residential subdivisions, someone else raised at 'de- BEACH and park land acqui• the public h_e,aring 'de- NOTICE IS HEREBY GIV-. sition and development scribed in this notice, certify (or declare) under penalty�EN that on Monday,Oc- costs per acre used.to or in written corre- tober 1, 2012, at 6:00 credit partial park land spondence.'delivered to of perjury that the foregoing is true p-T. in the City Council dedication. the City at, or.prior to, Chambers, 2000 Main the Citywide the .public hearing, If Street, Huntington Ramos Planner: Ricky there are any further and correct. Beach, the City Council questions please call will hold a public hear- the Planning and 'ing on the following planning and zoning, i items: Executed on October 1, 2012 at Los Angeles, California Signature