HomeMy WebLinkAboutAudits - Yearly - Diehl, Evans and Company - 1965-1971 M F, M 0 R A N I) U M
TO: See Distribution
FROM: Brander D. Castle , Assistant Administrator
DATE: June 10, 1971
Attached is the quarterly audit report and recommendations
for the City of Huntington Beach. The Finance Director is
requested to coordinate and implement the recommendations
set forth therein. An effort will be made to immediately
start the recommendations by the Recreation Department .
The Finance Director will make every effort to comply with
the points set forth under general and the Treasurer ' s
Department will immediately bring up to date the cost
control and assessment district bond ledgers . Copies of
this memorandum will go to the City Council so your
compliance with this request at the very earliest date
is directed by the City Administrator.
Brander D. Castle
Assistant Administrator
BDC:bwo
attach.
Distribution: City Council
Finance Director
Treasurer
Recreation & Parks Director
City Council
City of Huntington Beach -2- April 13, 1971
Many municipalities budget appropriations higher than our maximum fee
for the regular audit to enable them to utilize our services, as many of our
clients do, in special studies and reviews. In some cases we are asked to
provide a city with an outside independent viewpoint on a matter. In many other
instances we perform functions which city personnel either do not have the time
to perform or do not have the background to do so.
We are broaching this subject at this time because we recognize that
cities in general are facing prospects of inadequate revenue resources for the
programs they desire to carry out. We can perhaps lend some assistance as
another resource tool to city management on long range planning and budgeting
and cost control programs,
We are extremely pleased to be associated with the City of Huntington
Beach in the capacity of independent auditors. We trust that we may continue to
provide the city with a high level of professional assistance in all areas of
financial responsibility. If you have any questions regarding this proposal or
{ if we can be of assistance in any way, please call on us at any time.
If this proposal is satisfactory, please in your acceptance of
k same by signature on the attached copy in the space provided.
Very truly yours,
DIEHL, EVANS AND COMPANY
i
4
By \ �
i
F Accepted:
By
Title
l
DIEHL, EVANS AND COMPANY
FLLISCERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
BRYN C.DIEHL,C.P.A.(1925-1956� 1910 NORTH BUSH STREET OTHER OFFICES AT:
RYN B.EVANS,C.P.A, 705 EAST MAIN STREET '
WIN-G. PETERS,C.P.A. SANTA ANA,CALIFORNIA 92706 _ SANTA ASTMAR M IN STREET
DONALD H,PETERSON,C.P.A. KIMBERLY 2-4453 WALNUTS-ALIF ORNIA
DONALD E.CALLAHAN,C.P.A. _ _
L.PETER SCHERER,C.P.A.
535 NORTH H STREET
WARD M.GALLACH ER,C.P.A. - � -
JOHN A.RAABERG,C.P.A. - LOMPOC,CALIFORNIA
November 23, 1970 REGENT 6-9252
APPROd,EL+O'BY -:Ty CC)UNCIL
City Council
City of Huntington Beach �.-.••--- -•--•�
Huntington Beach, California ctry CLERK I
Gentlemen:
In connection with our examination of the financial statements of
the City of Huntington ,Beach for the year ended June 30, 1971, we have in
accordance with our agreement, completed certain phases of our work covering
the three months ended September 30, 1970.
The scope of our interim examination to date included the following:
1. Items of a financial nature were excerpted from the
Council minutes for subsequent tracing to the financial
records.
2. Testing of cash receipts and disbursements,. on a
sampling basis was commenced.
3. Tests were made of selected revenue accounts to as-
certain that the receipts were.properly recorded in the
accounting records and that proper control was being
maintained in .the handling of-cash receipts.
No items of significance came, to our attention in the areas tested
which would warrant disclosure to the council at this time.
Very truly yours,
DIEHL, EVANS AND COMPANY
By :�
DIEHL, EVANS AND COMPANY
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
ELLIS C.DIEHL,C.P.A.(1925-1956) _ OTHER OFFICES AT:
1910 NORTH BUSH STREET - -
- BRYN B.EVANS,C.P.A. 705 EAST MAIN STREET
WIN"G. PETERS,C.P.A. - SANTA ANA,CALIFORNIA 9270.6 - SANTA MARIA,CALIFORNIA
DONALD H.PETERSON,C.P.A. KIMBERLY 2-4453 WALNUT 5-2579
DONALD- E.CALLAHAN,C.P.A. - - -
L.PETER SCHERER,C.P.A. - - - 535 NORTH H STREET -
WARD M.GALLACHER,C.P.A. LOMPOC,CALIFORNIA
JOHN A.RAABERG,C.P.A. June 15, 1970
- - - REGENT 6-8252
City. Council
City of Huntington Beach
Huntington Beach, California
Gentlemen:
In connection with our examination of the financial statements of the
City.of Huntington Beach for the .year ending June 30,. 1970, we have, in accordance
with our agreement, completed certain phases of our work covering the nine months
ended March 31, 1970.
The scope of our interim examination to date included the following:
1. Items of-a financial nature were excerpted from the Council
minutes for subsequent tracing to the financial records.
2. Purchasing procedures and controls were reviewed and detailed
tests made of selected purchase orders.
3. Tests were made of selected revenue accounts to ascertain that
the receipts were properly recorded in the accounting records.
No items of sufficient significance came to our attention in the areas
tested. to warrant disclosure- to the Council at this time.
Very truly yours,
DIEHL, EVANS AND COMPANY
By
ING
RA
CITY OF jKMW&4'tMV
---------- -------6-1------------------
CP
CALIFORNIA
TY
CMay 5, 1970
0
y
Diehl, Evans and Company
1910 North Bush Street
Santa Ana, CA 92706
Gentlemen:
The City Council of Huntington Beach, at its regular meeting
held Monday, May 4, 1970, accepted your proposed maximum
fee for audit for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1971,
of $4,000.00.
Enclosed herewith, is a duly executed copy of your letter
submitting said proposal.
Sincerely yours,
Paul C. Jones
City Clerk
PCJ:aw
Enc.
DIEHL, EVANS AND COMPANY
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
ELLIS C.DIEHL,C.P.A41925-1G56) OTHER OFFICES AT:
1910 NORTH BUSH STREET 705 EAST MAIN STt.-C-
6RYN 6.EVAN S,C.P.A.WIN O.►¢TERS,C.P.A. SANTA ANA,CALIFORNIA 92706
SANTA MA
DONALD H.PETERSON,C.P.A. KIMBERLY 2-4453
DONALD E.CALLAHAN,C.P.A. WALNUUTT 5-257G
25F '�?tM�A
L.PETER SCHERCR,C,P.A. April 15, 1970 33S NORTH H STREET
WARD M.6ALLACHER,C.P.A.
JOHN A.RAAGER6,C.P.A. LOMPOC,CALIFORNIA
REGENT 6-6252
City Council
City of Huntington.Beach
P. 0. Box 190
Huntington Beach, California
Gentlemen:
We are reviewing our audit fees at this time to determine the adequacy
of our fees for the audit of your city for the year 1970-71 so that you may know
the basis on which to budget for the coming year.
A study of our salary costs disclosed that these have increased approxi-
mately 25% during the last two years only. This increase is profession-wide and
results from a combination of cost of living increases and a shortage of qualified
accounting personnel.
Since we are establishing fees to be charged for work to be done a year
to eighteen months from now we must presume that some additional increases in our
costs will take place.
Our fee for the audit for the year ending June 30, 1970 has previously
been established at a maximum of $3,225400 and this will be the basis for our
billing for the current year. However this fee does not appear to be sufficient
to cover both the growth of the city and increases in our costs since total time
charges for the regular audit of your city has averaged $4,590.00 per year for
the last three years.
We propose a new maximum fee for the audit for the fiscal year ending
June 30, 1971, of $4,000.00. You will benefit from any time savings in that we
will- bill you only for the actual time charges expended should they be less than
the above. These charges will be based on the following per diem rates:
Partner $30.00
Manager $20.00 - $25.00
Supervisor $16.00 - $19.00
Senior accountant $15.00 - $16.00
Assistant $12.00 - $15.00
Clerical $5.00
We believe this fee to be reasonable for an efficiently conducted audit.
We complete nearly, one hundred governmental audits each year. As a result we have
an experienced staff and have designed standard audit programs and reports. This
allows us to spend relatively more time in actual field work checking on internal
control and counseling city personnel on the development and maintenance of good
accounting records and reports.
City of Huntington B4Oh -2- �. April 15, 1970
If this proposal is satisfactory please indicate your acceptance of sank:
by signature on the attached copy in the space provided.
We are extremely pleased to be associated with the City of Huntington ;each
in the capacity of independent auditors. We trust that we may continue to prov ,le
the City of Huntington Beach with a high level of professional assistance in all
areas of financial responsibility. If you have any questions regarding this
proposal or if we can be of assistance with any accounting problems please call
on us at any time.
Very truly yours,
DIEHL, EVANS AND COMPANY
By •
Accepted:
Title
DIEHL, EVANS AND COMPANY
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
ELLIS C.DIEHL,C.P.A.(1925-1956) OTHER OFFICES AT:
B RYN B.EVAN S,C.P.A. 1910 NORTH BUSH STREET 705 EAST MAIN STREET
WIN G. PETERS,C.P.A. SANTA ANA,CALIFORNIA 92706 SANTA MARIA,CALIFORNIA
DONALD H.PETERSON,C.P.A. KIMBERLY 2-4453 WALNUT 5-2579
DONALD E.CALLAHAN,C.P,A.
L.PETER SCHERER,C.P.A. - 535 NORTH H STREET
WARD M.GALLACHER,C.P.A. LOMPOC,CALIFORNIA
JOH N A.RAABERG,C.P.A. [�
RAYMOND V. FRAZIER,C.P.A. May 18, 1971 REGENT 6-8252
City Council
City of Huntington Beach
Huntington Beach, California �r� �ti �� �e- ✓v
Gentlemen:
In connection with our examination of the financial statements of the City
of Huntington Beach for the year ended June 30, 1971, we have completed the following
additional phases of our interim work:
1. Items of a financial nature were excerpted from the Council
minutes for subsequent tracing to the financial records.
2. Testing of cash receipts and disbursements, on a sampling
basis, was continued for the period reviewed.
3. Procedures for internal control of cash receipts were
reviewed for selected revenue accounts.
4. Appropriations per the general ledger were reviewed for
compliance to the 1970-71 budget and properly approved revisions.
5. Confirmations were sent out for selected utility accounts for
agreement to city records.
6. Counts were made of selected city cash funds for agreement to
control amounts.
7. Payroll procedures were reviewed and detailed tests were made
of selected employees for agreement to city wage scales and
that withholdings were in agreement with governmental regulations.
As a result of our review we submit the following recommendations:
Recreation Department:
1. Prenumbered receipts or numerically controlled tickets should be employed
for all payments received. They are presently issued• only
at the request of the payor,
2. Total monies received and deposited for a particular program
should be reconciled to the total number of participants.
3. Consideration could be given to the use of a cash register
in the recreation department.
4. The cash box should be kept in a safe-place overnight such
as a vault or locked in a desk drawer,
City Council
City of Huntington Beach -2- May 18, 1971
General :
1. It was noted that monies collected by various department
were being held for a considerable length of time. Deposits
should be made to the city cashier on a timely basis, preferably
daily.
2. For historical record purposes all departments making deposits
to the cashier should obitain a validated deposit slip and
maintain such on file. The finance department should maintain
and control pre-numbered receipts received with the cash
receipts summary.
3. Paid invoices should be stamped or perforated to prevent
repayment.
4. As part of our interim examination we selected four special
assessment district bond ledgers for balancing to the
accounting records. In two of the districts the cash on
hand per the bond ledgers did not agree with the accounting
records.
We recommend that all special assessment district bond ledgers
be reconciled to the accounting records. It was also noted
that the Treasurers office is behind in updating the cash
control and assessment district bond ledgers.
Very truly yours,
DIEHL, EVANS AND COMPANY
I
by
i
i
I
I
M E M 0 R A N D U M
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council TO:
FROM: Doyle Miller, City Administrator
DATE : April 26 , 1971
The attached letter from Diehl ,, Evans and Company, the
city 's auditors , sets forth the maximum fee and the charges
on which the fee is based for the fiscal year ending
June 30 , 1972 .
It is the recommendation of the Finance Director and the
City Administrator that the proposal be accepted .
Doyle ller
ille City
V
ity ministrator
DM: BWO
attach .
M 1:
DIEHL, EVANS AND .COMPANY
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
ELLIS C.DIEHL,C.P.A.(1925-1956) - OTHER OFFICES AT:
BRYN B.EVAN S,C.P.A.
1910 NORTH BUSH STREET - -
� - � 705 EAST MAIN STREET
WIN G. PETERS,C.P.A. ., SANTA ANA,CALIFORNIA 92706 SANTA ASTMAR M IN STREET
DONALD H.PETERSON,C.P.A. KIMBERLY 2-4453 - WALNUT 5-2579
IFORNIA
DONALD E.CALLAHA N,C.P.A. -
L.PETER SCHERER,C.P.A. - 535 NORTH H STREET
WARD M,GALLACHER,C.P.A.JOHNA. C.P.A. LOMPOC,CALIFORNIA IA
RAYMOND V. FRAZIER,C.P.A. A ril 13� 1971 REGENT 6-8252
City Council
City of Huntington Beach
P. 0. Box 190
Huntington Beach,_ California
Gentlemen:
Most of our municipal clients are now preparing budgets for the
1971-72 fiscal year. Our contracts provide for any request for a change in
the audit fee to .be made at this time so that the new fee can be reflected
in the new budget.
Our fee' for the 1970-71 audit has previously been established at
$4,000 and this will be the basis for our billing for the current year.
We have made a careful review of past years time charges and have
conservatively es.timated the effect of increased salaries and other costs
during the coming year to arrive at an estimate of total time charges for
1971-72.
-Based on this estimate we propose 'a new maximum fee for the fiscal
year ending June 30, 1972 of- $4,600. Our clients will .benefit from any time
savings in that we will bill for only the actual time charges expended should
they be less than the above.
These charges will be based on the following per diem rates:
Partner $30-35
Manager $22-27
Supervising Senior $20-25
Senior $16-19
Assistant $11-15
.Clerical $4-6
We believe this fee to be reasonable for an efficiently conducted
audit. We complete approximately one hundred audits each year of governmental
agencies. As a result we .have designed standard audit programs and reports.
This allows us to spend relatively more time in actual. field work in auditing,
checking internal control, and counseling with city personnel on the development
and maintenance of good accounting records and reports.
City Council
City of Huntington Beach -2- April 13, 1971
Many municipalities budget appropriations higher than our maximum fee
for the regular audit to enable them to utilize our services, as many of our
clients do, in special studies and reviews. In some cases we are asked to
provide a city with an outside independent viewpoint on a matter. In many other
instances we perform functions which city personnel either do not have the time
to perform or do not have the background to do so.
We are broaching this subject at this time because we recognize that
cities in general are facing prospects of inadequate revenue resources for the
programs they desire to carry out. We can perhaps lend some assistance as
another resource tool to city management on long range planning and budgeting
and cost control programs.
We are extremely pleased to be associated with the City of Huntington
Beach in the capacity of independent auditors. We trust that we may continue to
provide the city with a high level of professional assistance in all areas of
financial responsibility. If you have any questions regarding this proposal or
if we can be of assistance in any way, please call on us at any time.
If this proposal is satisfactory, please indicate your acceptance of
same by signature on the attached copy in the space provided.
Very truly yours,
DIEHL, EVANS AND COMPANY
By
i
Accepted:
I
By
i
i
Title
I
I
I
I
� I
rr'
F
i
To �� Date
00 Bvs s /d cc--
TO ESV&c -s 17WVe ,;Z�z
c
i /,t//�2�5+��r•�•J o�- i2�Zo.�.r�S r.(O '?o Oe�-fc .�9k��
�JdJNEZErS�' �C�rxOt�✓X-to dr=
Tam c a . rY �c Ve
i
�rZ�a-1�lr�� ifi��.�v✓rr� ,-
PLEASE REPLY TO — Signed
Date Signed
Redif?rm SEND PARTS 1 AND 3 WITH CARBONS INTACT.
4S 465 PART 3 WILL BE RETURNED WITH REPLY.
�• �4 City of Huntington Beach
ra DATE APe•
i
i
TO /5 QX-/K Ae,5y ZL O
FROM 3,e/' -A/Dg-X C.4.5
❑ FOR YOUR INFORMATION
❑ NOTE & FILE
❑ NOTE & RETURN
❑ PREPARE REPLY FOR ABOVE
❑ REPLY DIRECT
K INVESTIGATE & REPORT
❑ CONTACT ABOVE ON THIS MATTER
❑ IN ACCORDANCE WITH YOUR REQUEST
❑ PLEASE CIRCULATE
REMARKS
i
126,EWs E 61 Je U5 veu le
/Z&-c a 14 M+ EN�fI
$y Fawo.ZPA-4Dere C31srt
DIEHL, EVANS AND COMPANY
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
E LLIS C.DIEHL,C.P.A.(1925-1956) OTHER OFFICES AT:
1910 NORTH BUSH STREET 705 EAST MAIN STREET
B RYN B.EVANS,C.P.A.
WIN G. PETERS,C.P.A. SANTA ANA,CALIFORNIA 92706 SANTA MARIA,CALIFORN IA
DONALD H.PETERSON,C.P,A. Kim BERLY 2.-4453 WALNUT 5-2579
DONALD E.CALLAHAN,C.P.A.
L.PETER SCHERER,C.P.A.
535 NORTH H STREET
WARD M.GALLACHER,C..P.A.
JOHN A.RAABERG,C.P.A. - LOMPOC,CALIFORNIA
RAYMOND V. FRAZIER,C.P.A. April 13, 1971 REGENT 6-8252
City Council
City of Huntington Beach
P. 0. Box 190
Huntington Beach, California.
Gentlemen:
Most of our municipal clients are now preparing budgets for the
1971-72 fiscal year. Our contracts provide for any request for a change in
the audit fee to be made at this time so that the new fee can be reflected
In the new budget.
Our fee for the 1970-71 audit has previously been established at
$4,000 and this will be the: .basis for our billing for the current year.
We have made a careful review of past years time charges and have
conservatively estimated the effect of increased salaries and other costs
during the coming year to arrive at an estimate of total time charges for
1971-72.
Based on this estimate we propose a new maximum fee for the fiscal
year ending June 30, 1972 of $4,600. our clients will benefit from any time
savings in that we will bill for only the actual time charges expended should
they be less than the above.
These charges will be based on the following per diem rates:
Partner $30-35
Manager $22-27
Supervising Senior $20-25
Senior $16-19
Assistant $11-15
Clerical $4-6
We believe this fee to be reasonable for an efficiently conducted
audit. We complete approximately one hundred audits each year of governmental
agencies. as a result we have designed standard audit programs and reports.
This allows us to spend relatively more time in actual field work in auditing,
checking internal control, and counseling with city personnel on the development
and maintenance of good accounting records and reports.
3
MEHL. EVAmS AND COMPANY
CCRfTIVIED PUBLIC ACCOUNVANTB
(CLIf�C.®I(WL,C.rA.(t988•tNS8) ItD10 gOWT00 ®1d11P1 $TiR6[Y OYCtlgW(i>B90�Sfl®8:
MOVN Q.TVANS,C.P.A. PC% (AST MAM OTR(BT
WIN 6.P(T(RS,C.P.A. SAWTA ANA,CALIFORNIA 02700 t3�ITA 68A>8?A,S6M 19&'�BEiti�L,a
CG ALO 6.CALLAHANPETERSON,C.P.A. (llCIOQRL�8�49$S WALNYT$-267a /
Q9NAL0 (.CALLANAN,C.P.A. �
L.
G P(T(R OCNENtCALLACR,C.C A. April 15 1970 use NORTW 64 OV099T
eAco® U.oALLAceICR,C.P.A. � s
JOHN A.SAA®(Ra,C.P.A. a.CQOR+®G,Q�+b!®
APpRO V B Mae aly o-eawn
. ° c�vvcI
City Council
City of Huntington Beach19,-„�
P. 0, Boat 190 -
Buntington Beach, California
Gentlemen:
We are reviewing our audit fww at this t1m to determine the ada4mcy
of our fees for that audit of your city for the year 1970-71 so that you may kam
the basis on which to budget for the commies year.
A study of our salary coasts disclosed that tbaee have increased affrmi- .
} astely 252 during the last rw peace *sty, This increase is profession-wide and
results from a combination of cost of living increases and a shortage of qualified
accounting personnel.
Since we are establishing tees to be ehused for work to be done a Yaw
to eighteen months from now we w8t p mas that @am mWitional increases in our
eosts will take place.
Our gee for the audit for tho year endi4 .dune 30, 1970 has previously
been established as a waxieaA of $3.225.00 and this will be the basis for our
billing for the current year. However thin, fee does not appear to be sufficient
to cover both the growth of the city crew increases in our costs since total tim
charges for the regular audit of your city has averaged $4,590.00 per yanar for
the last three years..
We propose a new maxis= few for the audit for the fiscal year eneliag
.dune 30, 1971, of $4,000.00. You will benefit fr mm any time savings in. that we
will bill you only for the actual tine chaargee expanded should they be leas than
the above- These charges will be based on than following per diem rates:
Partner . $30.00
Manager $20.00 - $25.00
Supervisor $16.00 m $19.00
Senior accountant $15,00 - $16.00
Assistant $12.00 - $15.00
Clerical $5.00
We believe this fees to be reasonable for an efficiently conducted audit.
We complete nearly one hundred govicerene wtal suafits 'each year. As a result we have
an experienced staff and have designed standard audit program and ieports. Thin
allows us to spend relatively more tiem in actual field work checking on internal
control and counseling city personnel on the development and maintenance of good
accounting records and reports.
City cf ilintington Beach, -2- April 15, 1970
If thin proposal is satisfactory please indicate your acceptance of same
by signature on th,? attached copy in the space. provided.
We are extremely pleased to be associated with the City of Huntington Beach
in theusapazity of independent auditor€. We trust that we may cor,t..nue to provide
the City of Huntington Beach with a high level of professicnal assistance in all.
areas of finar.ciJ rr-spo^-ihilit:r If you have any questions regard `ng this
proposal cr if we can be of assistance with any accounting problems please call
on us at any time,
Very truly yours.;
D I EHL. EVAN S AND COMPANY
By
Accepted.
Title
=0 COWICIL
DIEHL, EVANS AND COMPANY
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
ELLIS C.DIEHL,C.P.A.(1925-1956) OTHER OFFICES AT:
BRYN B.EVANS,C.P.A. 1910 NORTH BUSH STREET -
705 EAST MAIN STREET
WIN G. PETERS,C.P.A. SANTA ANA,CALIFORNIA 92706 SANTA MARIA,CALIFORNIA
DONALD H.PETERSON,C.P.A. KIMBERLY 2-4453 WALNUT 5-2579
DONALD E.CALLAHAN,-C.P.A.
L.PETER SCHERER,C.P.A. 535 NORTH H STREET
WARD M.GALLACHER,C.P.A.
JOHN A.RAABERG,C.P.A. -LOMPOC,CALIFORNIA
RAYMOND V. FRAZIER,C.P.A. February 20, 1970 REGENT 6-8252
Z44
City Council -r
"-.,:City,of -Hurifington Beach
Huntington Beach, California
Gentlemen:
In connection with .our examination of the financial statements of the
City of Huntington Beach for the year ending June 30, 1970, we have, in accordance
with our agreement, completed certain phases -of our work covering the six months .
ended December 31, 1969.
The scope of our interim examination to date included the following:
1. Items -of. a financial nature were excerpted from the Council
minutes for subsequent tracing to the financial records.
2. Purchasing procedures and controls were reviewed and detailed
tests made of selected purchase orders.
3. Tests were made of selected revenue accounts to ascertain that
the receipts were properly recorded in the accounting records.
No items of sufficient significance came to our attention in the areas
tested to warrant disclosure to the ,Council at this time.
Very .truly yours,
DIEHL, EVANS AND COMPANY
By
t
i
i
i
i
April 24, 1969
Diehl, Evans and Company
1910 North Bush Street
Santa Ana, California 92706
Gentlemen:
The hest Orange County Water Board, on April 23, 19692
approved the¢Audit Services Agreement for the fiscal
year 1969-70.
DA fully executed copy is attached for your files .
Sincerely yours,
Paul C. Jones
Secretary
PCJ:aw
Enc.
DIEHL, EVANS AND COMPANY
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
ELLIS C.DIEHL,C.P.A.(1925-1956) OTHER OFFICES AT:
B RYN B.EVANS,C.P.A.
1910 NORTH BUSH STREET 705 EAST MAIN STREET
"
WIN G. PETERS,C.P.A. SANTAANA,CALIFORNIA 92706 SANTA MARIA,CALIFORNIA
DONALD H.PETERSON,C.P.A. KIMBERLY 2-4453 _ WALNUT 5-2579
DONALD E.CALLAHAN,C.P.A. _ _
L.PETER SCHERER,C.P.A. - 53S NORTH H STREET
WARD M.GALLACHER,C.P.A.
JOHN A,RAABERG,C.P.A. - LOMPOC,CALIFORNIA
April 3, 1969 REGENT 6-8252
City Council
City of Huntington Beach
Huntington Beach, California
Gentlemen:
In connection with our examination of the"financial statements of
the City of Huntington Beach for the year ending June 30, 1969, we have
completed certain phases of our work covering the quarter.ended December 31,
1968.
Our interim examination for the quarter ended December 31, 1968
included a review of various cash receipt and expenditure controls.
1
Receipts were tested by examination of prenumbered receipt number
sequence and other remittance material as. compared to bank deposits.
Expenditures were tested by examination of vendors' invoices,
purchase -orders, approvals, and such other substantiating evidence deemed
appropriate in the circumstances.
Water billing procedures were reviewed and tests made of selected
transactions.
Council minutes, resolutions and ordinances were .reviewed for
items of a financial nature.
Nothing came to our attention in the areas covered by our tests
which would warrant disclosure to the Council at this time.
Very truly yours,
DIEHL, EVANS AND COMPANY
By
Jeonr:.ls OUNCIL
MiL
o pt. 7P 'C, c &.7
. J
4
DIEHL, EVANS AND COMPANY
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
E LLIS C.DIEH L,C.P.A.(1925-1856
OTHER OFFICES AT:
BRYN B.EVANS,C.P.A. 1910 NORTH BUSH STREET 705 EAST MAIN STREET
WIN G.PETERS,C.P.A. SANTA ANA,CALIFORNIA 92706 SANTA MARIA,CALIFORNIA.
DONALD H.PETERSON,C.P.A. KIMBERLY 2-4453 -
WALNUT 5-2579
DONALD E.CALLAHAN,C.P.A.
(..PETER SCHERER,C.P.A.
535 NORTH H STREET
WARD M.GALLACH ER,.C.P.A.
JOHN A.RAABERG,C.P.A. December 24, 1968 LOMPOC,CALIFORNIA
REGENT 6-8252
City Council By
City of Huntington Beach """"'
Huntington Beach, California , _ .......... ]g�q
- Gentlemen:
In connection with our examination of the financial statements
of the City of Huntington Beach for the year ending June 30, 1969, we have .
completed certain phases of our work covering the quarter ended September .30,
1968.
Our interim examination for the quarter ended September 30, 1968
included a review of various cash receipt and expenditure controls.
Receipts were tested by examination of prenumbered receipt number
sequence and other remittance material as compared to bank deposits.
Expenditures were tested by examination of vendors' invoices,
purchase orders, approvals, and such other substantiating evidence deemed
appropriate in the circumstances..
Council minutes, resolutions and ordinances were reviewed for
items of a financial nature.
Nothing came to our attention in•'the areas covered by our tests
which would warrant disclosure' to the Council at this- time.
Very truly yours,
DIEHL,• EVANS AND COMPANY
• ' By
U COUNC(d
DIEHL, EVANS AND COMPANY JUs 13 196b
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS �JJ
ELLIS C.DIEHL,C.P.A.(1925-1956) 1910 NORTH BUSH STREET OTHER OFF CES AT:
BRYN B.EVANS,C.P.A. 705 EAST MAIN STREET
WIN G. PETERS,C.P.A. SANTA AN A,CA LIFORNIA 92706 SANTA MARIA,C4LIFORNIA
DONALD H.PETERSON,C.P.A. KIMBERLY 2-4453
WALNUT 5-2579
DONALD E.CALLAHAN,C.P.A. -
L.PETER SCHERER,C.P.A. -
535 NORTH H STREET -
WARD M.GALLACHER,C.P.A.
JOHN A.RAABERG,C.P.A. June 4 1968 LOREGENT6-825 NIA
7 - REGENT 6-6252
City Council
City of Huntington Beach
Huntington Beach, California
Gentlemen:
In connection with our examination of the financial statements of
the City of Huntington Beach for the year ending June 30, 1968, we. have
completed certain phases of our work covering the quarter ended March 31, 1968.
Our interim examination for the quarter ended March 31, 1968, included
a review of the reconciliation of fund cash balancesas reflected on the City
finance department's records to balances as shown. by bank statements. Petty
cash and change funds were counted and reconciled.
Investments were reviewed and reconciled to book balances.
Expenditures were tested by examination of vendors' invoices, purchase
orders, approvals, and such other substantiating evidence deemed appropriate in
the circumstances.
Franchise, royalty, planning, and subdivision revenues were examined
on a test basis for propriety of charges.
Council minutes, resolutions and ordinances were reviewed for items
of a financial nature.
Nothing came to our attention in the areas covered by our tests which
would warrant disclosure to the Council at this time.
Very truly yours,
DIEHL, EVANS AND COMPANY
By
1
APR .G: .jIN9
DIEHL, EVANS AND COMPANY
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
ELLIS C.DIEH L,C.P.A.(1925-1956) OTHER OFFICES AT:
1910 NORTH BUSH STREET
BRYN B.EVANS,C.P.A. 705 EAST MAIN STREET
WIN G. PETERS,C.P.A. SANTA ANA,CALIFORNIA 92706 SANTA MARIA,CALIFORNIA
DONALD H.PETERSON,C.P.A. KIMBERLY 2-4453
WALNUT 5-2579
DONALD E.CALLAHAN,C.P.A.
L.PETER SCHERER,C.P.A. -
535 NORTH H STREET
WARD M.GALLACHER,C.P.A.
JOHN A.RAABERG,C.P.A. April 1 1968 LOREGENT6-825CALIFORNIA
) REGENT 6-8252
City Council
City of Huntington Beach
Huntington Beach, California
Gentlemen:
In connection with our examination of the financial statements of
the City of Huntington Beach for the year ending June 30, 1968, we have com-
pleted certain phases of our work covering the quarter ended December 31,
1967.
Our interim examination for the quarter ended December 31, 1967,
included a review of the reconciliation of fund cash balances as reflected
on the City finance department's records to-balances as shown by bank statements.
Investments 'were reviewed and reconciled to book balances.
Expenditures were tested by examination of vendors' invoices, purchase
orders, approvals, and such other substantiating evidence deemed appropriate
in the circumstances.
Business license and building permit revenues were examined on a test
basis for propriety-of charges.
Council minutes, resolutions and ordinances were reviewed for items
of a financial nature. f^
Nothing came to our attention in the areas covered by our tests which
would warrant disclosure to the Council.at this time.
•Very truly yours,
DIEHL, EVANS AND COMPANY
. f DIEHL, EVANS AND COMPANY
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
ELLIS C,DIEHL,C,P.A.(1925-1956) OTHER OFFICES AT:
1910 NORTH BUSH STF'FEET BRYN B.EVANS,C.P.A. 705 EAST MAIN STREET
WIN G. PETERS,C,P,A. SANTA ANA,CALIFORNIA 92706 SANTA MARIA,CAI_IFORNIA
DONALD H.PETERSON,C.P.A. KIMBERLY 2-4453
WALNUT 5-2579
DONALD E.CALLAHAN,C.P.A.
L.PETER SCHERER,C.P.A. ,535 NORTH H STREET
- WARD M.GALLACH ER,C,P.A.
LO NIA
JOHN A,RAASERG,C,P.A. REGENT 6-8252 May 12, 1967
A
3'./
II
The Honorable City Council 19---- -
City of Huntington Beach
Huntington Beach, California
Gentlemen:
In connection with our examination of the financial statements of
the City of Huntington Beach for the year ending June 30, 1967, we have
completed certain phases of our work covering the quarter ended March 31, 1967 .
Our interim examination for the quarter ended March 31, 1967
included reconciliation of fund cash balances as reflected on the City
finance department's records to balances shown by bank statements .
Investments were reviewed and reconciled to book balances .
Expenditures were tested by examination of vendors ' invoices,
purchase orders, approvals, and such other substantiating evidence deemed
appropriate in the circumstances.
Payroll proced^u=res were examined and payroll expenditures were
tested by examination of time sheets, approved rates, computations for
gross pay and deductions, and checks issued.
Interfund transfers were examined for propriety.
Council minutes, resolutions and ordinances were reviewed for
items of a financial nature.
Very truly yours,
DIEHL, EVANS AND COMPANY
By
,�- 3
3 a•.
DIEHL, EVANS AND COMPANY
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
E LLIS C.DIEHL,C.P.A.(1925-1956) OTHER OFFICES AT: -
BRYN B.EVANS,C.P.A. 1910 NORTH BUSH STREET 705 EAST.MAIN STREET
WIN G.PETERS,C.P.A. - SANTA ANA,CALIFORNIA 92706 SANTA MARIA,CALIFORNIA
DONALD H.PETERSON,C.P.A. KIMBERLY 2-4453
WALNUT 5-2579
DONALD E.CALLAHAN,C.P.A.
L.PETER SCHERER,C.P.A. .. 535 NORTH H STREET
WARD M.GALLACHER,C.P.A. March 25 1967
� LO M POC,CALIFORNIA
JOHN A.RAABERG,C.P.A.
REGENT 6-6252
ByFThe Honorable City Council
City of Huntington Beach .APR 3 196719
Huntington Beach, California
Gentlemen:
In connection with our examination of the financial statements
of .the City of Huntington Beach for the year ending June 30, 1967, -_we
have completed certain phases of our work covering the quarter ended
December 31, 1966.
Our interim examination for the quarter ended December 31,. 1966,
included reconciliation of fund cash balances as reflected 'on the City
finance department's records to balances shown by bank statements.
Investments were reviewed and reconciled to book balances.
Expenditures were tested by examination of vendors' invoices,
purchase orders, approvals, and such other substantiating evidence deemed
appropriate- in the circumstances.
Business license acid building permit revenues were examined on
a test basis for propriety of charges.
Council minutes, resolutions and.ordinances were reviewed for
items of a financial.nature.
Very truly yours,
DIEHL, EVANS AND COMPANY
By
DIEHL, EVANS AND COMPANY
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
ELLIS C.DIEHL,C.P.A.(1925-1956) OTHER OFFICES AT:
I910 NORTH BUSH STREET
B RYN B.EVAN S,C.P.A. 307 SOUTH LINCOLN STREET
WIN G.PETERS,C.P.A. SANTA ANA,CALIFORNIA 92706 SANTA MARIA,CALIFORNIA
DONALD H.PETERSON,C.P.A. KIMBERLY 2-44S3 WALNUT 5-2579
ROLIN E.CUMMINGS,C.P.A.
DONALD E.CALLAHAN,C.P. A. 535 NORTH H STREET
L.PETER SCHERER,C.P.A. LOMPOC,CALIFORNIA
JOHN A.RAABERG,c.R A. November 30, 1966 REGENT 6-8252
;statements
The Honorable City Council
City of Huntington Beach ByEC 1Huntington Beach, California Gentlemen:
In connection with our examination of the finan of the
City of Huntington Beach for the year ending June 30, 1967, we have completed
certain phases of our work covering the quarter ended September 30, 1966 . Under
the terms of our engagement, certain phases of our annual examination are con-
ducted on an interim basis at quarterly intervals throughout the year. However,
it is only at the close of the fiscal year, June 30, 1967, that our examination
is sufficient in scope to permit us to express An opinion on the financial
statements of the City.
Our interim examination for the quarter ended September 30, 1966,
included a review of the reconciliation of fund cash balances as reflected on
the books of the City Treasurer to the fund cash balances recorded on the City
Finance Department's records and balances shown by bank statements . '
Investments were reviewed and reconciled to book balances.
Expenditures were tested by examination of vendors' invoices,
purchase orders, approvals, and such other substantiating evidence deemed
appropriate in the circumstances.
Business. license revenues were reviewed for propriety of collections.
Parks and recreation receipts were compared to potential receipts as
indicated by attendance reports.
Council minutes, resolutions and ordinances were reviewed for
items of a financial nature.
No other points of sufficient interest were disclosed during our
interim examination to warrant reporting to the Council at this time.
I
Very truly yours,
i
DIEHL, EVANS AND COMPANY
By
DIEHL, EVANS AND COMPANY
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
ELLIS C.DIEHL,C.P.A.(1925-1956) 1910 NORTH BUSH STREET OTHER OFFICES AT:
BRYN B.EVANS,C.P.A. 307 SOUTH LINCOLN STREET
WIN G.PETERS,C.P.A. SANTA ANA,CALIFORNIA 92706 SANTA MARIA,CALIFORNIA
DONALD H.PETERSON,C.P.A. KIMBERLY 2-4453
WALNUT 5-2579
ROLIN E.CUMMINGS,C.P.A.
DONALD E.CALLAHAN,C.P.A. 535 NORTH H STREET
L.PETER SCHERER,C.P.A.
LO M POC,CALIFORNIA
JOHN A.RAABERG,C.P.A. May '!9, 196E
8:J Eat S�J! REGENT 6-8252
The honorable City Council
City of Huntington teach
unt.i.n for Beach, California
cntlemeu
In tonne;t on with bur examination of the financial statements of the
City 6 Huntington Beach for the year ending .Tune 30, 1966, we have completed
certain phases of out Toork dovbring the quarter ended march 31., 066. under
the terms of our en�,a ient, .certain phases of our annual examination are con-
acted on an interim basis .rat -quarterly intervals throughout the year. However.
it is only at the close or' the fiscal year, .Tune 30, 1966, that our ex rnination
. is sufficient in ✓cape to permit- us to express an opinion on the financial
statements of the City;'
Our interim o4amination for the quarter ended March al 19b6, included
a review of the reconciliation of fund caah balances as reflacted on the books
of the City Treasurer .to the fund cash balantps recorded on the City Finance
epartmont's records and balances shown by bank statements.
We also reviewed cash c6ll.ect oh activities of various City departments.
e noted that receipts ate not turned over to the City Treasuker for deposit to
the bank daily. too advocate daily deposits of all cash ireceipts from all City
Depa;r� ments tea provide for stronger control. over City funds. 'the establishment
of a: Central. Cniihicri.ng System sbluld correct this situation.
xpenditurds %sere tested by examination of vendors" invoices, purchase
orders, approvals,, and such other substantiating evidence dee od appropriate in
the circtmstances 3
in.ves t nts were reviewed and reconciled to book balances.
Council mi:nutds, resolutions and ord€nanc"' were revi.eved 4n4 excerpted
for items of a findfidiAl nature for tracing, to the accounts.
i
City Cmualcil
. .City o-i Hunt-ington .Beach -2- s Y-lay 1 , 1966
Revenues from �rnnchises were xest'ed with reference to applicable
ifes,olutiQn7s, and a
greements.
No other -points of bufficient. aiiterest were disclosed during our interim
e%p&miha.tion to warrant kdoorting to ;the Council at this time.
Very trtlly your€a,
DIEHL, EVANS AND C014PA 'Y
By
i
I
I
AI
DIEHL, EVANS AND COMPANY
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
ELLIS C.DIEHL,C.P.A.(1925-1956) OTHER OFFICES AT:
1910 NORTH BUSH STREET
. BRYN B.EVAN S,C.P.A. 307 SOUTH LINGOLN STREET
WIN G.PETERS,C.P.A. - SANTAANA,CALIFORNIA 92706 SANTA MARIA,CALIFORNIA
DONALD H.PETERSON,C.P.A. KIMBERLr 2-4453
ROLIN E.CUM MING S,C.P.A. WALNUT 5-2579
DONALD E.CALLAHAN,C.P. A.
- 535 NORTH H STREET
L.PETER SCHERER,C.P.A.
JOHN A.RAABERG,C.P.A. - January26 1966 LOREGENT6-825CALIFORNIA' -
� REGENT 6-8252
The Honorable City Council
City of Huntington Beach By E
Huntington Beach, California 96
�E0. . 1g
Gentlemen:
In connection with our examination 'of the .financial statements of
the City of Huntington Beach for the .year ending June 30, 1966, we have com-
pleted certain phases of our work covering the quarter ended December 31, 1965.
Under the terms of our engagement, certain phases of our annual examination
are conducted on an interim basis at quarterly intervals throughout the year.
However, it is only at the close of the fiscal year, June 30, 1966, that our
examination is sufficient in scope to permit us to express an opinion on the
financial statements of the City.
Our interim examination for the quarter ended December 31, 1965,
included a reconciliation of fund cash balances as reflected on the books
of the City Treasurer to the fund cash balances .recorded on the City Finance
Departments records and balances. shown by bank statements.
Our interim examination also included surprise cash counts of
twelve of the sixteen petty cash funds located in the various. departments
throughout the City. Very minor differences were noted in three-of the
petty cash funds and we reviewed control procedures with the custodian. in
each case. Our main concern is with the large number of petty cash funds
in existence throughout the City: We suggest that a study aimed at the
eliminating of all petty cash funds except at one central readily accessible
_ .point be made. If the physical location of a department, whose activities
require that they make numerous minor cash purchases, is such as to make it
too costly to send their people to the. central point for cash, then an.
Additional fund could be established for .each such department.
-1-
Q..,r.,ly P60-0d 4T
- The Honorable City Council
City of Huntington Beach -2- January 26, 1966
No other points disclosed during our interim examination were of
sufficient significance to warrant reporting to the Council at this time.
Very truly yours,
DIEHL, EVANS AND COMPANY
ByL�2 '' /1-� 1" --
p - -2 y
DIEHL, EVANS AND COMPANY
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS.
ELLIS C.DIEHL,C.P.A.(1925-I956) OTHER OFFICES AT:
1 - -.
B RYN B.EVAN S.C.P.A. 910 NORTH BUSH STREET- 307'S OUTH LINCOLN STREET
WIN G.PETERS,C.P.A. SANTA ANA,CALIFORNIA 92706 SANTA MARIA,CALIFORNIA
DONALD H.PETERSON,C.P.A. KIMBERLY 2-4453
RO LIN E.CUM MiNGS,C.P.A. WALNUT 5-2579
-
DONALD E.CALLAHAN,C.P.A.
- 535 NORTH H-STREET
L.PETER SCHERER,C.P.A.
LOM POC,CALI FORN IA
JOHN A.RAABERG,C.P.A. November 30, 1965 REGENT 6-8252
Y E '
The Honorable City Council
City of Huntington Beach By
Huntington Beach, California UEC 20-_-1965y-
Gentlemen:
In connection with our examination of the financial statements of the
City of .Huntington Beach for the year. ending June 30, 1966, we have completed
certain phases of our work covering the quarter ended September 30, 1965. Under
the terms of our engagement, certain phases of our annual examinations are
conducted on an interim basis at quarterly intervals throughout the year, but
it is only at the close of the fiscal year, June 30, 1966, that our examination
is sufficient in scope to permit us to express an opinion on the financial
statements of the City.
The scope of our interim examination for the quarter ended September 30,
1965, included a reconciliation of fund cash balances as reflected on the records
of the City Treasurer to the fund cash balances recorded on the City Finance
Department's records . These adjusted fund cash balances as of September 30, 1965,
were then reconciled to the amounts shown per the bank statements . Copies of
the reconciliation of fund cash balances and the necessary adjusting entries
were given to the City Treasurer and the Director of Finance for recording .
into their respective financial records.
Our interim examination also included testing of payroll procedures
with reference to pay rates and authorized deductions. Our examination of
supporting documents in personnel files .indicated that the files should be
reviewed and payroll deduction authorizations be-brought up to date. Also that
payroll transaction sheets should be filed up to date. It is recommended that
all wage increases and reclassifications be supported by properly approved
payroll transaction sheets .
'1_
City Council
City of Huntington Beach -2- November 30, 1965
We were assured that with the addition to the personnel staff the files
would be brought up to date in the near future.
Disbursements to vendors were also examined on a test basis and some
suggestions for improvement of internal control were made to accounting personnel.
No other points of significant interest were disclosed during our interim
examination to warrant reporting to the Council at this time.
Very truly yours,
?-y•� L �� i Goo - 'z�" ��`_
iGG� �
DIEHL, EVANS AND COMPANY
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
E LLIS C.DIEHL,C.P.A.(1925-1956) OTHER OFFICES AT:
1910 NORTH BUSH STREET
B RVN B.EVANS,C.P.A. 307 SOUTH LINCOLN STREET
WIN G.PETERS,C.P.A. SANTA ANA,CALIFORNIA 92706 A,CA ORNIA
LIF
DONALD H.PETERSON,C.P.A. KIMBERLY 2-4453 SANTA MARWALK WALNUT
5-2LIF
ROLIN E.CUMMINGS,C.P.A,
579
DONALD E.CALLAHAN,C.P. A. November- 18, 1965 535 NORTH H STREET
L.PETER SCHERER,C.P.A. LOMPOC,CALIFORNIA
JOHN A.RAABERG,C.P.A.
REGENT 6-8252
"�J y
.DES. s 19 �
City Council
City of Huntington Beach
Huntington Beach, California
Gentlemen:
Our annual audit report for the City of Huntington Beach
for the year ended June 30, 1965 contained the following statement
on page 21:
"All depositaries except the United California Bank met
this requirement. Collateral pledged by United Cali-
fornia Bank was under the required amount by approxi-
mately $290,000.00."
Information received after completion of our audit work
confirmed the fact that additional collateral was held for United
California Bank by Title Insurance and Trust Company. Therefore,
the following sentence should be substituted for the two sentences
quoted above:
"All depositaries had met this requirement at June 30, 1965."
We hope this change will not cause you too much inconven-
ience.
Very truly yours,
DIEHL, EVANS AND COMPANY
By ( Cs�f ram.