HomeMy WebLinkAboutAdopt Resolution No. 2016-46 authorizing the adoption of a C6/23/2016
Measure M
Seven Year Capital Improvement Program (Sorted by Project Name)
Fiscal Years 2016/2017 through 2022/2023
Agency:
Huntington Beach
Project Name:
Adams Avenue Traffic Signal Synchronization and
FUND NAME ...... --' ,,,1? RCENT }
`eSTIMAT O COST
.PR6 CTSLI:COST
:. � i", �.,
Communication Fouioment Uoorades
Other 2.68
$5,000
$5,000
Annual Maintenance
Project Limits:
From Beach Boulevard to City Boundary (Multi
AQMD 97.32
$181,495
$181,495
Jurisdictional)
Project Number:
13-OCTA-TSP-3663
$186,495
$186,495
Type of work (Tow):
Systems Management
TOW Description:
Communications intertie between agency and
Caltrans to manage traffic
Project Description:
Provide operational and infrastructure improvements.
E
$57,600
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$57,600
$57,600
R
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
C/I
$123,895
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$123,895
$123,895
x i&M
Zo
$0
$5,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$5,000
$5,000
$181,495
$5,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$186,495
$ 186,495
Vi
E
Agency:
Huntington Beach
Project Name:
Arterial Rehabilitation
Project Limits:
Heil Ave (Edwards -Springdale), Atlanta Ave
(Delaware -Beach), and Indianpolis Ave
Project Number:
/Beach -Magnolia)
Type of work (Tow):
Road Maintenance
TOW Description:
Rehabilitation of roadway
Project Description:
Rehabilitate Artrerial's Heil Avenue, Atlanta Avenue,
and Indianapolis Avenue
%j /40
maERCS
t�fp
y
General Fund
22.73
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
M2 Fairshare
45.45
$2,000,000
$2,000,000
Other
27.27
$1,200,000
$1,200,000
Infrastructure
Fund
Prop 42
4.55
$200,000
$200,000
$4,400,000
$4,400,000
$50,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$50,000
$50,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$4,350,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$4,350,000
$4,350,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$4,400,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$4,400,000
$ 4,400,000
I
CAD /2016
t
01� Agency: Huntington Beach
Project Name: Arterial Rehabilitation Gothard Street and Center
Avenue
Project Limits: Gothard St. (Edinger to McFadden) and Center Ave.
(Gothard to Railroad Tracks)
Project Number:
Type of work (Tow): Road Maintenance
TOW Description: Rehabilitation of roadway
Project Description: Rehabilitate Pavement including replacement of
concrete and addition of ramps. This project was an
amendment to FY 15/16 CIP.
E $0 $0
R $0 $0
C/I $1,400,000 $0
&M $0 $0
$1,400,000 $0
i
Measure M
Seven Year Capital Improvement Program (Sorted by Project Name)
Fiscal Years 2016/2017 through 2022/2023
/
i6ilb NAME. "
„.
Gas Tax 100.00 $1,400,000 $1,400,000
$1,400,000 $1,400,000
$0 $0
$0 $0
$0 $0
$0 $0
$0 $0
Agency:
Huntington Beach
Project Name:
Arterial Rehabilitation: Adams Ave (Beach to
Newland) and Atlanta Ave (Beach To Newland)
Project Limits:
Adams Avenue (Beach to Newland) and Atlanta
Avenue (Beach To Newland)
Project Number:
Type of work (TOW):
Road Maintenance
TOW Description:
Rehabilitation of roadway
Project Description:
Pavement rehabilitation for two arterial segments
including replacement of concrete and trees. This
project is a carryover from FY 15/16 CIP.
$0 $0
$0
$0
$0
$0 $0
$0
$0
$0
$0 $0
$0
$1,400,000
$1,400,000
$0 $0
$0
$0
$0
$0 $0
$0
$1,400,000
$ 1,400,000
UNii NAME :" ..'
" .98TIMATED aost •
C� _ b CI T.
with:'
M2 Fairshare 70.73
$0
$0
Other 0.00
$0
$0
Regional Surface Transportation Grant
(RSTP)
$0
$0
.. v .. ....: y
Ah"..
:, /
�Y'... "::' , /, ',,'', r!
/„
,./ ..Sn�.. ..
•�i„..,:w� .. „•?% /il:.,�°.w,
E
$0
$0
$0 $0 $0
$0
$0
$0 $0
R
$0
$0
$0 $0 $0
$0
$0
$0 $0
C/I
$0
$0
$0 $0 $0
$0
$0
$0 $0
O&M
$0
$0
$0 $0 $0
$0
$0
$0 $0
$0
$0
$0 $0 $0
$0
$0
$0 $ 0
2
6/23 22016
Agency:
Huntington Beach
Project Name:
Atlanta Avenue Widenina
Project Limits:
Atlanta Avenue (Huntington St. to Delaware St.)
Project Number:
15-HBCH-ACE-3770
Type of work (TOW):
Road Widening
TOW Description:
Add 1 lane to existing roadway in project limits
Project Description:
This project will widen the south side of Atlanta
Avenue. This project is carryover from FY 15/16
CIP.
Measure M
Seven Year Capital Improvement Program (Sorted by Project Name)
Fiscal Years 2016/2017 through 2022/2023
TI u •
�{;'iy.yeµ
M2 ACE 75.00 $0 $0
General Fund 25.00 $0 $0 25% Match to previously approved M2 ACE
$0 $0
IE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
R $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
C/I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
I&M $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ 0
Agency:
Huntington Beach
Project Name:
Bridae Preventative Maitenance
Project Limits:
Magnolia Street and Brookhurst Street Bridge at
Pacific Coast Hiahwav
Project Number:
Type of work [TOW):
Road Maintenance
TOW Description:
Bridge
Project Description:
Provide Design and Construction of City Bridges
including Roadway. This project was included as an
amendment to FY 15/16 CIP.
r
;
'PUI4i`f11Aik
..
Gas Tax
16.94 $708,329
$708,329
M2 Fairshare
1.08 $45,000
$45,000
Other
72.74 $3,040,931
$3,040,931 Water Fund
Prop 42
9.24 $386,273
$386,273
$4,180,533
$4,180,533
3
E
$924,533
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$924,533
$924,533
R
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$3,256,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$3,256,000
$3,256,000
:M
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$4,180,533
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$4,180,533
$ 4,180,533
CN
/2016
01
t
Agency:
Huntington Beach
Project Name:
Brookhurst Street and Adams Avenue Intersection
Improvement
Project Limits:
Intersection of Brookhurst Street and Adams Avenue
Project Number:
11-HBCH-ICE-3526 (Engineering)
Type of work (TOW):
Intersection
TOW Description:
Add through and right turn lanes to intersection
Project Description: Add through lanes and right turn pockets to
intersection to improve traffic flow and reduce
congestion.
Measure M
Seven Year Capital Improvement Program (Sorted by Project Name)
Fiscal Years 2016/2017 through 2022/2023
s Z / =
yr
NI;
,as Tax 1.19 $84,604 $87,590
42ICE 3.57 $253,809 $262,769 11-HBCH-ICE-3526
Infunded 95.23 $6,761,587 $7,000,274
$7,100,000 $7,350,633
4
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
IE
R
$0
$2,900,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$2,900,000
$2,963,800
C/I
$0
$0
$4,200,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$4,200,000
$4,386,833
i&M
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$2,900,000
$4,200,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$7,100,000
$ 7,350,633
00
i
Agency:
Huntington Beach
Project Name:
Brookhurst Street Svnchronization
Project Limits:
Garfield Avenue to Pacific Coast Highway
Project Number:
16-OCTA-TSP-3794
Type of Work (TOW):
Traffic Signals
TOW Description: Interconnect traffic signals to improve coordination
and communication
Project Description: Provide operational and infrastructure improvements.
This is a corridor project managed by OCTA and
funding reflets planned improvements within
Huntington Beach only.
,,: „ „
r
11' ,,.._..r. F:,
ti sir
E $0
rF
$0
r
tl
$0
$0
.... .. , .::, -=
$0 $0
22
$0
it , ,,,. F,, ':
UP
$0
+.M`rrs"z, , r .: l///fix ;. .; •.y:.
, • ! j;
a*...
7,7777
$0
R
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
C/I
$0
$0
$833,490
$0
$0
$0
$0
$833,490
$870,567
O&M
$0
$0
$0
$5,000
$5,000
$0
$0
$10.000
$10,000
$0
$0
$833,490
$5,000
$5,000
$0
$0
$843,490
$ 880,567
1 6/23/2016
Agency:
Huntington Beach
Project Name:
Bushard/Adams Water Qualitv Proiect
Project Limits:
Frontage median on Bushard and Adams
Project Number:
14-HBCH-ECP-3732
Type of work (TOW):
Environmental Cleanup
Tow Description:
Irrigation system retrofits to reduce runoff
Project Description:
Retrofit asphalt frontage medians on Bushard Street
and Adams Avenue with bio-retention swales for
water quality.
Measure M
Seven Year Capital Improvement Program (Sorted by Project Name)
Fiscal Years 2016/2017 through 2022/2023
FUND' 1i . STIMATED COST llpw jaC'CEt1. rE i N ...
Gas Tax 35.28 $25,403 $25,403
General Fund 6.58 $4,739 $4,739
M2 ECP Tier II 58.14 $41,858 $41,858
$72,000 $72,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
(E
R
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
C/I
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
i&M
$12,000
$12,000
$12.000
$12,000
$12,000
$12,000
$0
$72,000
$72,000
$12,000
$12,000
$12,000
$12,000
$12,000
$12,000
$0
$72,000
$ 72,000
Agency: Huntington Beach
Project Name: Concrete ReDlacements
Project Limits: Citywide
';
is .... ESTIMATED COST PROD CTEp } htDTES
General Fund 100.00 $1,250,000 $1,306,223
$1,250,000 $1,306,223
E
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
R
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
r-+ 1
$250,000
$250,000
$250,000
$250,000
$250,000
$0
$0
$1,250,000
$1,306,223
CD :M
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$250,000
$250,000
$250,000
$250,000
$250,000
$0
$0
$1,250,000
$ 1,306,223
5
i-�
C—D /2016
Agency:
Huntington Beach
Project Name:
Edinaer Avenue Traffic Sianal Svnchronization
Project Limits:
Edinger Avenue from Bolsa Chica Street to State
Route-55
Project Number:
12-OCTA-TSP-3625
Type of work (TOW):
Systems Management
TOW Description:
Communications intertie between agencies to
manage traffic
Project Description:
Provide operational and infrastructure improvements
(multijurisdictional project including Caltrans,
Westminster, Fountain Valley, and Santa Ana) City
work includes signal timing and traffic signal
interconnect cable.
0.
f/i y 10��i19
%�%/
E
$0 $0 $0
R
$0 $0 $0
C/I
$0 $0 $0
I&M
$2,142 $0 $0
$2,142 $0 $0
O
Agency:
Huntington Beach
Project Name:
Edinaer Avenue Widenina
Project Limits:
South Side of Edinger Avenue from Beach Boulevard
to Parkside Lane
Project Number:
Type of work (TOW):
Road Widening
TOW Description:
Widen width of existing traffic lanes
Project Description:
Extend the Right Turn Lane on Southside of Edinger
Avenue. This project was an amendment to the FY
15/16 CIP.
Measure M
Seven Year Capital Improvement Program (Sorted by Project Name)
Fiscal Years 2016/2017 through 2022/2023
�ESTIM1lTi
4 ,�1,
/€
IttNr}-NJiMI
b €f;3T -._
.' t�fYdJ .r r ` , �<:�$li�:'�„
'+
M2 TSSP
77.94 $1,669
$1,669
OCTA anticipated expenditures
AQMD
22.06 $473
$473
AQMD
$2,142
$2,142
$0 $0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 $0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 $0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 $0
$0
$0
$2,142
$2,142
$0 $0
$0
$0
$2,142
$ 2,142
ti
FUND NAME PIv�tD � �STIMATSb dd* PROJNMC*6 J ....... it
Impact Fees 100.00 $600,000 $600,000
$600,000 $600,000
z aiiai�yiarii
15 7.
, < 2112�
22123
,,.: '
�.
�,"� ���%� ',�� t. . ,�' a„
Tt°�
E
$0 $0 $0
$0 $0
$0
$0
$0
$0
R
$0 $0 $0
$0 $0
$0
$0
$0
$0
C/I
$600,000 $0 $0
$0 $0
$0
$0
$600,000
$600,000
O&M
$0 $0 $0
$0 $0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$600,000 $0 $0
$0 $0
$0
$0
$600,000
$ 600,000
6
6/23/2016 Measure M 7
Seven Year Capital Improvement Program (Sorted by Project Name)
Fiscal Years 2016/2017 through 2022/2023
Agency:
Huntington Beach
111
Project Name:
First Street Diversion
t �? AI6AE � #
.471MA1 ,. ... i i p �a _ ..tv r ..
/// .. ..
General Fund 100.00
$7,548 $7,548
Project Limits:
First Street near Pacific Coast Highway
$7,548 $7,548
Project Number:
12-HBCH-ECP-3621
Type of work (TOW):
Environmental Cleanup
Tow Description:
Runoff Diversion
Project Description:
Design and install a SCADA system and flow weir
for the First Street Urban Runoff Discharge Permit
with OCSD to protect water qualiity of City and
Pacific Ocean.
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
IE
R
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
C/I
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
'&M
$1,258
$1,258
$1,258
$1,258
$1,258
$1,258
$0
$7,548
$7,548
$1,258
$1,258
$1,258
$1,258
$1,258
$1,258
$0
$7,548
$ 7,548
i
Agency:
Huntington Beach
Project Name:
General Street Maintenance for Public Works
Project Limits:
Citywide
Project Number:
Type of Work (TOW):
Pedestrian
TOW Description:
Reconstruction or rehabilitation of sidewalk
Project Description:
Annual maintenance work for concrete, potholes
and failed asphalt, O&M of traffic signals,
replacement of striping and signage, including
engineering and inspection as needed on an annual
basis. This Work was added as an amendment to FY
15/16 CIP.
�k_: ESTIMATED G4$T: ; P6_..,;''..
M2 Fairshare 100.00 $9,800,000 $10,471,045
$9,800,000 $10,471,045
IE
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
e~-F
$1,400,000
$1,400,000
$1,400,000
$1,400,000
$1,400,000
$1,400,000
$9,800,000
$10,471,045
a$1,400,000
:M
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,400,000
$1,400,000
$1,400,000
$1,400,000
$1,400,000
$1,400,000
$1,400,000
$9,800,000
$ 10,471,045
/2016
t
N
Agency:
Huntington Beach
Project Name:
Goldenwest Street Traffic Signal Synchronization
and Communication Enuioment Unarades
Project Limits:
Goldenwest St. from State Route 22 to Pacific Coast
Hiahwav
Project Number:
11-OCTA-TSP-3554
Type of work (TOW):
Traffic Signals
TOW Description:
Coordinate signals within project limits
Project Description: Provide operational and infrastructure upgrades
including signal timing and installation of fiber optic
cable along Goldenwest Street. Multijurisdictional
project includes Caltrans and City of Westminster.
Measure M
Seven Year Capital Improvement Program (Sorted by Project Name)
Fiscal Years 2016/2017 through 2022/2023
iww////u,.STtBtIATt
t.bS,' • ( ili ,.u.
, ., _ti��k•.r
42 TSSP
78.02
$2,539 $2,539
QMD
21.98
$715 $715
$3,254 $3,254
8
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
IE
R
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
CA
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
i&M
$3,254
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$3,254
$3,254
$3,254
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$3,254
$ 3,254
[J
Agency: Huntington Beach
Project Name: Huntington Beach Catch Basin Retrofit Project tJNn NAj1([ ' . ORON `• r.. " / o
tiMnt>w"b twins °.:mitts ,... ;.
General Fund 100.00 $30,000 $30,000
Project Limits: City-wide
$30,000 $30,000
Project Number: 14-HBCH-ECP-3742
Type of work (TOW): Environmental Cleanup
TOW Description: Catchment Retrofit
Project Description: Retrofit 84 existing catch basins with Bio Clean
Round Curb Inlet Filters.
„ ..
--12
221i
:,< xis,7,r r,� '"?:�'%�%fir ,a x
°.
' : �.,
,.
, ,;..., �' „ , ,i i.
.,.� ..
E
$0 $0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 $0
R
$0 $0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 $0
C/I
$0 $0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 $0
O&M
$5,000 $5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$0
$30,000 $30,000
$5,000 $5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$0
$30,000 $ 30,000
1 6/23/2016
Agency:
Huntington Beach
Project Name:
Huntington Beach Northwest Catch Basin Retrofit
Proiect
Project Limits:
City-wide in Northwest Part of City
Project Number:
13-HBCH-ECP-3687
Type of work (TOW):
Environmental Cleanup
Tow Description:
Catchment Retrofit
Project Description:
Retrofit 126 existing catch basins with Bio Clean
Round Curb Inlet Filters and Skimmer Box.
Measure M
Seven Year Capital Improvement Program (Sorted by Project Name)
Fiscal Years 2016/2017 through 2022/2023
SUN NA g PERCENT ESTIMATED 66k FrRojEc`r i1
General Fund 100.00 $30,000 $30,000
$30,000 $30,000
E
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
IE
R
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
C/I
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
&M
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$0
$30,000
$30,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$0
$30,000
$ 30,000
W
i
Agency:
Huntington Beach
Project Name:
Huntinaton Harbour Marina Trash Skimmers
Project Limits:
Various Locations within Huntington Harbour
Project Number:
Type of work (TOW):
Environmental Cleanup
TOW Description:
Marina Trash Skimmer
Project Description:
Marian Trash Skimmers will be installed in various
locations
FUND NAME
PE CENT„ ;,,,,.
ESTIMATED
PROJEC
General Fund
12.50
$12,186
$12,186
Other
12.50
$12,186
$12,186
Donations County
Unfunded
75.00
$73,118
$73,118
$97,490
$97,490
IE
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
e~-r
CD
$97,490
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$97,490
$97,490
:M
$0
$0
$0
$0
0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$97,490
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$97,490
$ 97,490
1
/2016
G�
t
Agency:
Huntington Beach
Project Name:
Maonolia Street Svnchronization
Project Limits:
from Garfield Avenue to Pacific Coast Highway
Project Number:
16-CTA-TSP-3795
Type of work (TOW):
Traffic Signals
TOW Description:
Interconnect traffic signals to improve coordination
and communication
Project Description:
Provide operational and infrastructure improvements
Measure M
Seven Year Capital Improvement Program (Sorted by Project Name)
Fiscal Years 2016/2017 through 2022/2023
',
FI t+1t Nam.
y RCENT'',
...' E5TIMATEb COST
PROJECTED CQ�T.. `::\iWES..
General Fund
1.36
$10,000
$10,439
M2 TSSP
71.42
$524,364
$547,372
AQMD
27.21
$199,789
$208,555
$734,153
$766,366
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
IE
R
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
C/I
$0
$0
$724,153
$0
$0
$0
$0
$724,153
$756,366
&M
tz
$0
$0
$0
$5,000
$5,000
$0
$0
$10,000
$10,000
$0
$0
$724,153
$5,000
$5,000
$0
$0
$734,153
$ 766,366
i
Agency:
Huntington Beach
Project Name:
McFadden/Edwards and Heil/Algonquin Catch Basin
Retrofit Protect
Project Limits:
City-wide
Project Number:
11-HBCH-ECP-3573
Type of work (TOW):
Environmental Cleanup
TOW Description:
Automatic Retractable Screen and other debris
screens or inserts
Project Description:
Provide maintenance for catch basin screens.
NA �,-
' '
�
Ft1Nn
PERCENT . 01"TED t OST
PROJECTEiS SST - N�
;,%
General Fund
100.00 $30,450
$30,450
$30,450
$30,450
10
/ o
E
/
$0 $0
$0 $0 $0
$p ..
22123
-
$0
it
�tt �� / f?i`C!'E3C�+ S . � •-!
$0 $0
R
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
C/I
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
O&M
$5,075
$5,075
$5,075
$5,075
$5,075
$5,075
$0
$30,450
$30,450
$5,075
$5,075
$5,075
$5,075
$5,075
$5,075
$0
$30,450
$ 30,450
F-623172016
Agency:
Huntington Beach
Project Name:
Nichols Street Rehabilitation
Project Limits:
Slater Avenue to Warner Avenue
Project Number:
Type of work (TOW):
Road Maintenance
TOW Description:
Rehabilitation of roadway
Project Description:
Rehabilitate asphalt pavement including sidewalk and
curb and gutter removal. This project was added as
as an Amendment to FY 15/16 CIP.
Measure M
Seven Year Capital Improvement Program (Sorted by Project Name)
Fiscal Years 2016/2017 through 2022/2023
. 0 NAME :.
#��tCENT ' ESTIMATED COST, <;,,
P1t4lECTEi} ' .
Gas Tax
100.00 $735,000
$735,000
$735,000
$735,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
IE
R
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
C/I
$735,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$735,000
$735,000
I&M
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$735,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$735,000
$ 735,000
t,
i
Agency: Huntington beacn
Project Name: Rehabilitation of Residential Tree Petition Proiects
Project Limits: Typically one to three Residential Streets
0
:STMATED COST
s ST JTES
U
Gas Tax
100.00
$2,025,000
$2,085,276
$2,025,000
$2,085,276
E
$25,000
$25,000
$25,000
$25,000 $0
$0
$0
$0
$0 $0
CD
$575,000
$450,000
$450,000
$450,000 $0
'1 :M
$0
$0
$0
$0 $0
$600,000
$475,000
$476,000
$475,000 $0
t
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
22/2
„ $0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$100,000 $100,000
$0 $0
$1,925,000 $1,985,276
$0 $0
$2,025,000 $ 2,085,276
/2016
t
Agency:
Huntington Beach
Project Name:
Residential Curb Ramp Proiect
Project Limits:
Ramps to be installed throughout City
Project Number:
Type of Work (TOW):
Pedestrian
TOW Description:
Installation of ADA access ramps
Project Description: Install ADA Access Ramps . This is an annual
project that will install Ramps at locations where we
are providing an overlay to adjacent street. This
project was an amendment to FY 15/16 CIP.
Measure M
Seven Year Capital Improvement Program (Sorted by Project Name)
Fiscal Years 2016/2017 through 2022/2023
UNUSTIMATED COST PROJECTS - CRT S, / DBG 100.00 $1,861,810 $1,991,226
ias Tax 0.00 $0 $0
$1,861,810 $1,991,226
W,
E
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$35,000
$35,000
R
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
C/I
$206,810
$270,000
$270,000
$270,000
$270,000
$270,000
$270,000
$1,826,810
$1,956,226
&M
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$211,810
$275,000
$275,000
$275,000
$275,000
$275,000
$275,000
$1,861,810
$ 1,991,226
i
Agency:
Huntington Beach
Project Name:
Residential Overlav
Project Limits:
Citywide
Project Number:
Type of Work (TOW):
Road Maintenance
TOW Description: Rehabilitation of roadway
Project Description: Provide cold mill and overlay of various streets
throughout Huntington Beach. This annual project
will provide street overlay rehabiliation based on the
PIMP ratings. This project was an amendment to FY
15/16 CIP.
%: �( 21 i ...' •,':
g.
li % .,,
22123
tititdtt ib`e iJ%
`t
Z.
E
$10,006
$10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
$0
$0
$50,000
$50,000
R
$0
$0 $0 $0 $0
$0
$0
$0
$0
C/I
$2,270,000
$2,090,000 $2,090,000 $2,090,000 $2,090,000
$0
$0
$10,630,000
$11,100,027
O&M
$0
$0 $0 $0 $0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$2,280,000
$2,100,000 $2,100,000 $2,100,000 $2,100,000
$0
$0
$10,680,000
$ 11,150,027
6/23/2016 Measure M 13
Seven Year Capital Improvement Program (Sorted by Project Name)
Fiscal Years 2016/2017 through 2022/2023
Agency: Huntington Beach
Project Name: Signal Modification at Goldenwest Street and Heil
Avenue
Project i-imits: Intersection of Goldenwest Street and Heil Avenue
Project Number:
Type of Work (TOW):
Traffic Signals
TOW Description:
Interconnect traffic signals to improve coordination
and communication
Project Description:
Install left turn arrows at intersection including
interconnect conduit and cable on Goldenwest from
Heil Ave. to Warner Ave. This project is a carryover
from previous year FY 15116 CIP.
UND NAME PERCI T `.l „ a �STIIiMA7�f� �`�$� , ,,,��26}�E�i�D � 'fl $
3eneral Fund 89.97 $0 $0
tSIP 10.03 $0 $0
$0 $0
E $0 $0 $0 $0 ....
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
R $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
C/I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
'&M $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ 0
Agency: Huntington Beach%
Project Name: Signal Modification at Gothard St/Talbert Ave, NC1;1111i1tE y..•', �12CW1i ?,. < •:� $'iI 0fA1'0 CAST. ., .
Gothard St/Heil Ave and Springdale St/McFadden Gas Tax 10.00 $0 $0
Project Limits: kOrsections of Gothard/Talbert, Gothard/Heil, and HSIP 90.00 $0 $0
Snringdale/McFadden
Project Number: $0 $0
Type of Work (TOW): Traffic Signals
TOW Description: Interconnect traffic signals to improve coordination
and communication
Project Description: Add left turn signals and interconnect condiuti and
cable. This project is a carryover from previous FY
15/16 CIP.
IE
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
CD
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
:M
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$ 0
J
Agency: Huntington Beach
Project Name: Traffic Channelization Modifications
Project Limits: Main Street and Ellis Avenue
Project Number:
Type of Work (TOW): Traffic Signals
TOW Description: Replace and upgrade traffic signals and equipment
Project Description: Median island modification along with removal of
traffic signal
Measure M
Seven Year Capital Improvement Program (Sorted by Project Name)
Fiscal Years 2016/2017 through 2022/2023
i �i
1
t#NES.Nf4$AE
i/ .:, ESTIMATED twGS�3i
C�iit tJ�C1
,as Tax
100.00 $240,000
$240,000
$240,000
$240,000
14
E
$60,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$60,000
$60,000
R
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
C/I
$180,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$180,000
$180,000
i&M
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$240,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$240,000
$ 240,000
00
Agency: Huntington Beach nti y-
-.
Project Name: Traffic Signal Modification at Brookhurst Street & FUND NAME. . PERCE,, iESTtMATED COST PROJECTED COS-
Indianoolis Avenue Prop 42 100.00 $60,000 $60,000
Project Limits: Intersection of Brookhurst Street and Indianapolis $60,000 $60,000
Avenue
Project Number:
Type of work (TOW): Traffic Signals
TOW Description: Replace and upgrade traffic signals and equipment
Project Description: Replace conduit, wiring and signal heads at
intersection
c J1
17115
G/r1i ii , r
1
i %/
/ //i
21123
. ,,, N.'Y ., ,K" ...,"
_
IF,
E
$5,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$5,000 $5,000
R
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 $0
C/I
$55,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$55,000 $55,000
O&M
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 $0
$60,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$60,000 $ 60,000
6/23/2016 Measure M 15
Seven Year Capital Improvement Program (Sorted by Project Name)
Fiscal Years 2016/2017 through 2022/2023
Agency:
Huntington Beach
Project Name:
Traffic Signal Modification at Gothard Street and
Center Avenue
Project Limits:
Intersectoin of Gothard Avenue and Center Avenue
Project Number:
Type of Work (TOW):
Traffic Signals
TOW Description:
Interconnect traffic signals to improve coordination
and communication
Project Description:
Install north/south left turn arrows and installation of
interconnect conduit along Gothard between
McFadden and Edinger. This project is a carryover
from previous FY 15/16 CIP.
a o
}./�cG�{
G�YiwfiT
;as Tax 10.02
$0
$0
SIP 89.98
$0
$0
$0
$0
IE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
R $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
C/I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
i&M $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ 0
i
Agency:
Huntington Beach
Project Name:
Traffic Signal Modification at Gothard Street and
Slater Avenue
Project Limits:
Intersection of Gothard Street and Slater Avenue
Project Number:
Type of Work (TOW):
Traffic Signals
TOW Description:
Interconnect traffic signals to improve coordination
and communication
Project Description:
Install left turn arrows and interconnect conduit and
cable on Slater Ave, from Goldwenwest to Gothard.
This project is a carryover from previous FY 15/16
CIP.
k,,,,t?
11
li
/' " /
11RONT',
tiTIMATED COST
PRSi;1 1� ,
,NOTES " ,... ,,,.
;as Tax 10.02
$0
$0
ISIP 89.98
$0
$0
$0
$0
IE
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
e~t
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
:M
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
(7�
$0
$0
$0
$0
gp
$0
$0
$0
$ o
/2016
t
Agency:
Huntington Beach
Project Name:
Traffic Signal Modification at Main Street and Florida
StrP.et
Project Limits:
Intersection of Main Street and Florida Street
Project Number:
Type of Work (TOW):
Traffic Signals
TOW Description:
Replace and upgrade traffic signals and equipment
Project Description:
Replace poles, conduit wiring and signal heads at
intersection
O
O
Measure M
Seven Year Capital Improvement Program (Sorted by Project Name)
Fiscal Years 2016/201Tthrough 2022/2023
ESTIMATED COST PROJECtid,'
Prop 42 100.00 $265,000 $265,000
$265,000 $265,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$265,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$265,000
$265,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$265,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$265,000
$ 265,000
Agency:
Huntington Beach
Project Name:
Traffic Signal Modification at Newland Street and
Slater Avenue
Project Limits:
Intersection of Newalnd Street
Project Number:
Type of Work (TOW):
Traffic Signals
TOW Description:
Interconnect traffic signals to Improve coordination
and communication
Project Description:
Install left turn arrows and traffic signal controller
and service for pedestrian signal. This project is a
carryover from FY 15/16 CIP.
a, g
FUND NAME PERCENT ESTIMATED COST • PROJECTED COST ., = NOTE&
Gas Tax 10.00 $0 $0
HSIP 90.00 $0 $0
$0 $0
16
ii011111
4
E
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 $0
R
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 $0
C/I
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 $0
O&M
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 $0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 $ 0
6/23/2016 Measure M 17
Seven Year Capital Improvement Program (Sorted by Project Name)
Fiscal Years 2016/2017 through 2022/2023
Agency:
Huntington Beach
Project Name:
Traffic Signal Modification at Nichols Lane and
Warner Avenue
Project Limits:
Intersection of Nichols Lane and Warner Avenue
Project Number:
Type of work (TOWS:
Traffic Signals
TOW Description:
Replace and upgrade traffic signals and equipment
Project Description: Replace conduit, wiring and signal heads
'rop 42 100.00 $70,000 $71,430
$70,000 $71,430
E
$5,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$5,000
$5,000
R
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
^/I
$0
$65,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$65,000
$66,430
&M
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
' .
$5,000
$65,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$70,000
$ 71,430
O
i
Agency:
Huntington Beach
Project Name:
Utica Bicycle Boulevard from Main Street to Beach
Boulevard
Project Limits:
Utica Avenue from Main Street to Beach Boulevard
Project Number:
Type of Work (TOW): Bikeways
TOW Description: Widening of existing bike route
Project Description: Construct improvements to create a "Bicycle
Boulevard", where bicycling is empasized over
motor vehicle use. Project includes a new traffic
signal, curb bulb -outs, signing & striping
improvements. This project is a carryover from
previous FY 15/16 CIP.
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$ 0
/2016
NAgency:
Huntington Beach
Project Name:
Warner Avenue Traffic Signal Synchronization and
Commimication Enuioment Unarade
Project Limits:
Warner Avenue from Pacific Coast Hwy to Red Hill
Avenue
Project Number:
11-OCTA-TSP-3558
Type of Work (TOW): Traffic Signals
TOW Description: Coordinate signals within project limits
Project Description: Provide operational and infrastructure upgrades
including signal timing and installation of fiber optic
along Warner Avenue. Multijurisdictional project
includes Caltrans and Cities of Fountain Valley,
Santa Ana and Tustin.
Measure M
Seven Year Capital Improvement Program (Sorted by Project Name)
Fiscal Years 2016/2017 through 2022/2023
4TNE , NO RCEN7 ESTIMATED COST PROJECTED CE35T ..►C)i !,a.
02TSSP 79.17 $1,330 $1,330 OCTA anticipated expenditures
1QMD 20.83 $350 $350
$1,680 $1,680
E $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
R $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
^/I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
i&M $1,680 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,680 $1,680
' . $1,680 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,680 $ 1,680
0
IJ
18
ATTACHMENT A
i
TMnspoyqntlon lnvestmGM�
Approved by voters on November 7, 2006
ORANGE COUNTY LOCAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
550 South Main Street
P.O. Box 14184
Orange, CA 92863-1584
(714) 560-5066
www.octa. net
I a Updated March 14, 2016
Item 6. - 36 HB -116-
Table of Contents
Introduction..................................................... ........ ......... .............2
Overview.................................................. ..... .................. .............3
Freeway Projects
Overview.................. ............................... ........... ................. ............... ........ ..............5
Orange County Freeway Projects Map.. ...... — ................... --- ...... .......... ...6
1-5 Santa Ana Freeway Interchange Improvements ...........................7
1-5 Santa Ana/San Diego Freeway Improvements .............................8
SR-22 Garden Grove Freeway Access Improvements .............................9
SR-55 Costa Mesa Freeway Improvements............._.................................9
SR-57 Orange Freeway Improvements ....... ............... — ... ......................... 10
SR-91 Riverside Freeway Improvements .............................................11
1-405 San Diego Freeway Improvements .....-- ......... ......................13
1605 Freeway Access Improvements 15
i Freeway Service Patrol 15
Item 6. - 38
HB -118-
�x
v -
e \.
The Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment
Freeways
Plan is a 30-year, $11.8 billion program designed to
Relieving congestion on the Riverside/Artesia
reduce traffic congestion, strengthen our economy
Freeway (SR-91) is the centerpiece of the freeway
and improve our quality of life by upgrading
program, and will include new lanes, new
key freeways, fixing major freeway interchanges,
interchanges, and new bridges. Other major projects
maintaining streets and roads, synchronizing traffic
will make substantial improvements on Interstate
signals countywide, building a visionary rail transit
5 (I-5) in southern Orange County and the San
system, and protecting our environment from the oily
Diego Freeway (I-405) in western Orange County
street runoff that pollutes Orange County beaches.
The notorious Orange Crush —the intersection of
The Transportation Investment Plan is focused solely
the I-5, the Garden Grove Freeway (SR-22) and the
on improving the transportation system and includes
Orange Freeway (SR-57) near Angel Stadium —will
tough taxpayer safeguards, including a Taxpayer '
be improved and upgraded. Under the Plan, major
Oversight Committee, required annual audits,
traffic chokepoints on almost every Orange County
and regular, public reports on project progress.
freeway will be remedied. Improving Orange
County freeways will be the greatest investment
The Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment
in the Renewed Measure M program: Forty -
Plan must be reviewed annually, in public session,
three percent of net revenues, or $4.871 billion,
and every ten years a detailed review of the Plan
will be invested in new freeway construction.
must take place. If changing circumstances require
the voter -approved plan to be changed, those
Streets and Roads
changes must be taken to the voters for approval.
More than 6,500 lane miles of aging streets and roads
will need repair, rejuvenation and improvement.
City streets and county roads need to be maintained
regularly and potholes have to be filled quickly.
Thirty-two percent of net revenue from the Renewed
Measure M Transportation Investment Plan, or
$3.625 billion, will be devoted to fixing potholes,
improving intersections, synchronizing traffic signals
countywide, and making the existing countywide
network of streets and roads safer and more efficient.
3
I
i
I
I
i
Hs -119- Item 6. - 39
"9
I
i� � it P�� i I�� t
i�� •' `.�.
Cx - � .,
it i
Public Transit
program, or $118.6 million over 30 years, will
As Orange County continues to grow, building a
pay for annual, independent audits, taxpayer
visionary rail transportation system that is safe,
safeguards, an independent Taxpayer Oversight
clean and convenient, uses and preserves existing
Committee assigned to watchdog government
rights -of -way, and, over time, provides high-speed
spending, and a full, public disclosure of all Renewed
connections both inside and outside of Orange
Measure M expenditures. A detailed review of the
County, is a long term goal. Twenty-five percent
program must be conducted every ten years and,
of the net revenue from Renewed Measure M, or
if needed, major changes in the investment plan
$2.83 billion, will be dedicated to transit programs
must be brought before Orange County voters for
countywide. About twenty percent, or $2.24 billion,
approval. Taxpayers will receive an annual report
will be dedicated to creating a new countywide
detailing the Renewed Measure M expenditures.
high capacity transit system anchored on the
Additionally, as required by law, an estimated one
existing, successful Metrolink and Amtrak rail line,
and a half percent of the sales taxes generated, or
and about five percent, or $591 million, will be
$178 million over 30 years, must be paid to the
used to enhance senior transportation programs
California State Board of Equalization for collecting
and provide targeted, safe localized bus service.
the one-half cent sales tax that funds the Renewed
Measure M Transportation Investment Plan.
Environmental Cleanup
Every day, more than 70 million gallons of oily
In this pamphlet, every specific project, program,
pollution, litter, and dirty contaminants wash off
and safeguard included in the Renewed Measure
streets, roads, and freeways and pour onto Orange
M Transportation Investment Plan is explained.
County waterways and beaches. When it rains, the
Similar details will be provided to every Orange
transportation -generated beach and ocean pollution
County voter if the measure is placed on the ballot.
increases tenfold. Under the plan, two percent
of the gross Renewed Measure M Transportation
Investment Plan, or $237 million, will be dedicated
to protecting Orange County beaches from this
transportation -generated pollution (sometimes called
"urban runoff') while improving ocean water quality.
Taxpayer Safeguards and Audits
When new transportation dollars are approved,
they should go for transportation and transportation
purposes alone. No bait -and -switch. No using
transportation dollars for other purposes. The
original Measure M went solely for transportation
purposes. The Renewed Measure M must be just
as airtight. One percent of the gross Measure M
Item 6. - 40 HB -120-
K-
Z �
pi a
Rom...
3
Every day, traffic backs up somewhere on the
near Angel Stadium —is in need of a major face lift.
Orange County freeway system. And, every day,
And the intersection of Interstate 5 and the Costa
freeway traffic seems to get a little worse.
Mesa Freeway (SR-55) is also slated for major repair.
In the past decade, Orange County has made major
Pays Big Dividends
strides in re -building our aging freeway system.
Local investment in freeways also. pays big dividends
But there is still an enormous amount of work
in the search for other needed freeway dollars.
that needs to be done to make the freeway system
Because of state and federal matching rules, Orange
work well. You see the need for improvement every
County's local investment in freeway projects acts
time you drive.on an Orange County freeway. ;
as a magnet for state and federal transportation
dollars —pulling more freeway construction
Forty-three percent of net revenues from the
dollars into the county and allowing more traffic -
Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment Plan
reducing freeway projects to be built sooner.
is dedicated to improving Orange County freeways,
the largest portion of the 30-year transportation plan.
Innovative Environmental Mitigation
A minimum of $243.5 million will be available,
SR-91 is the Centerpiece
subject to a Master Agreement, to provide for
Making the troubled Riverside/Artesia Freeway
comprehensive, rather than piecemeal, mitigation of
(SR-91) work again is the centerpiece of the
the environmental impacts of freeway improvements.
Renewed Measure M Freeway program. The fix
Using a proactive, innovative approach, the
on the SR-91 will require new lanes, new bridges,
Master Agreement negotiated between the Orange
new overpasses, and, in the Santa Ana Canyon
County Local Transportation Authority and
portion of the freeway, a diversion of drivers to the
state and federal resource agencies will provide
Foothill Corridor (SR-241) so the rest of the Orange
higher -value environmental benefits such as
County freeway system can work more effectively.
habitat protection, wildlife corridors and resource
preservation in exchange for streamlined project
And there's more to the freeway program than the
approvals for the freeway program as a whole.
fix of SR-91—much more. More than $1 billion
is earmarked for Interstate 5 in South County.
Freeway projects will also be planned, designed
More than $800 million is slated to upgrade the
and constructed with consideration for their
San Diego Freeway (1-405) between Irvine and
aesthetic, historic and environmental impacts
the Los Angeles County line. Another significant
on nearby properties and communities using
investment is planned on the congested Costa
such elements as parkway style designs, locally
Mesa Freeway (SR-55). And needed projects
native landscaping, sound reduction and aesthetic
designed to relieve traffic chokepoints are planned
treatments that complement the surroundings.
for almost every Orange County freeway.
1
To make any freeway system work, bottlenecks at
interchanges also have to be fixed. The notorious
Orange Crush Interchange —where the Santa Ana
Freeway (1-5) meets the Orange Freeway (SR-57) and
the Garden Grove Freeway (SR-22) in a traffic tangle
r» "
HB -121- Item 6. - 41
Item 6. - 42 HB -122-
HB -123- Item 6. - 43
Item 6. - 44 H B -124-
Project
Garden Grove Freeway (SR-22)
Access Improvements
Description:
Construct interchange improvements at Euclid
Street, Brookhurst Street and Harbor Boulevard
to reduce freeway and street congestion near these
interchanges. Specific improvements will be subject
to approved plans developed in cooperation with
local jurisdictions and affected communities.
Regional plans also include the construction of
new freeway -to -freeway carpool ramps to the
SR-22/1-405 interchange, and improvements to
the local interchange at Magnolia Avenue using
federal and state funds.
Cost:
The estimated cost to improve the
SR-22 interchanges is $120.0 million.
Project 0
Costa Mesa Freeway (SR-55) Improvements
Description:
Add new lanes to SR-55 between Garden Grove
Freeway (SR-22) and the San Diego Freeway
(I-405), generally within existing right-of-way,
including merging lanes between interchanges to
smooth traffic flow. This project also provides for
freeway operational improvements for the portion
of SR-55 between SR-91 and SR-22. The project
will generally be constructed within the existing
right-of-way. Specific improvements will be subject
to approved plans developed in cooperation with
local jurisdictions and affected communities.
The project will increase freeway capacity and reduce
congestion. This freeway carries about 295,000
vehicles on a daily basis. This volume is expected
to increase by nearly 13 percent, bringing it up to
332,000 vehicles per day in the future. In addition
to the projects described above, regional plans also
include a new street overcrossing and carpool ramps
at Alton Avenue using federal and state funds.
Cost:
The estimated cost for these SR-55
improvements is $366.0 million.
HB -125-
Item 6. - 45
10
Project
Orange Freeway (SR-57) Improvements
Description:
Build a new northbound lane between Orangewood
Avenue and lambert Road. Other projects include
improvements to the Lambert interchange and
the addition of a northbound truck climbing
lane between Lambert and Tonner Canyon
Road. The improvements will be designed and
Y
coordinated specifically to reduce congestion at
SR-57/SR-91 interchange. These improvements
s �,
will be made generally within existing right -of-
way. Specific improvements will be subject to
approved plans developed in cooperation with
Y
local jurisdictions and affected communities.
The project will increase freeway capacity and reduce`
congestion. The daily traffic volume on this freeway
is about 315,000 vehicles. By 2030, this volume will
s
increase by 15 percent, bringing it up to 363,000
i
vehicles per day. In addition to the project described
�p ;
above, regional plans include new carpool ramps
Cerritos federal funds.
at Avenue using and state
Cost:
The implement
t ��
estimated cost to
SR-57 improvements is $258.7 million.
a
AV
Item 6. - 46 H B -126-
xs -127- Item 6. - 47
Project 0
Riverside Freeway (SR-91) Improvements
from Costa Mesa Freeway (SR-55) to
the Orange/ Riverside County Line
Description:
This project adds capacity on SR-91 beginning at
SR-55 and extending to I-15 in Riverside County.
The first priority will be to improve the segment
of SR-91 east of SR-241. The goal is to provide
up to four new lanes of capacity between SR-241
and Riverside County Line by making best use
of available freeway property, adding reversible
lanes, building elevated sections and improving
connections to SR-241. These projects would be
constructed in conjunction with similar coordinated
improvements in Riverside County extending to
I-15 and provide a continuous set of improvements
between SR-241 and I-15. The portion of
improvements in Riverside County will be paid for
from other sources. Specific improvements will be
subject to approved plans developed in cooperation
with local jurisdictions and affected communities.
This project also includes improvements to the
segment of SR-91 between SR-241 and SR-55.
The concept is to generally add one new lane in
each direction and improve the interchanges.
Today, this freeway carries about 314,000 vehicles
every day. This volume is expected to increase by 36
percent, bringing it up to 426,000 vehicles by 2030.
Cost:
The estimated cost for these improvements
to the SR-91 is $352.0 million.
Item 6. - 48
HB -128-
Project cost estimate amended on November 9, 2012.
Project 0
San Diego Freeway (1405) Improvements
between the 1-605 Freeway in Los Alamitos
area and Costa Mesa Freeway (SR-55)
Description:
Add new lanes to the San Diego Freeway between
I-605 and SR-55, generally within the existing right-
of-way. The project will make best use of available
freeway property, update interchanges and widen
all local overcrossings according to city and regional
master plans. The improvements will be coordinated
with other planned 1-405 improvements in the
1-405/SR-22/1-605 interchange area to the north
and 1-405/SR-73 improvements to the south. The
improvements will adhere to recommendations of
the Interstate 405 Major Investment Study
(as adopted by the Orange County Transportation
Authority Board of Directors on October 14,
2005) and will be developed in cooperation with
local jurisdictions and affected communities.
Today, 1-405 carries about 430,000 vehicles daily.
The volume is expected to increase by nearly 23
percent, bringing it up to 528,000 vehicles daily
by 2030. The project will increase freeway capacity
and reduce congestion. Near -term regional plans
also include the improvements to the 1-405/SR-73
interchange as well as a new carpool interchange
at Bear Street using federal and state funds.
Cost:
The estimated cost for these improvements
to the I-405 is $1,072.8 million.
Project cost estimate amended on Novem - -
HB -129- Item 6. - 49
14
Project
San Diego Freeway (1-405) Improvements
between Costa Mesa Freeway
(SR-55) and Santa Ana Freeway (1-5)
Description:
Add new lanes to the freeway from SR-55 to the
I-5. The project will also improve chokepoints
at interchanges and add merging lanes near on/
off ramps such as Lake Forest Drive, Irvine Center
Drive and SR-133 to improve the overall freeway
operations in the 1-405/I-5 El Toro "Y" area. The
projects will generally be constructed within the
existing right-of-way. Specific improvements will be
subject to approved plans developed in cooperation
with local jurisdictions and affected communities.
This segment of the freeway carries 354,000
vehicles a day. This number will increase by
nearly 13 percent, bringing it up to 401,000
vehicles per day by 2030. The project will increase
freeway capacity and reduce congestion. In
addition to the projects described above, regional
plans include a new carpool interchange at Von
Karman Avenue using federal and state funds.
Cost:
The estimated cost for these improvements
to the 1-405 is $319.7 million.
Item 6. - 50 FIB -130-
Project 0
1-605 Freeway Access Improvements
Description:
Improve freeway access and arterial connection
to I-605 serving the communities of Los Alamitos
and Cypress. The project will be coordinated with
other planned improvements along SR-22 and
I-405. Specific improvements will be subject to
approved plans developed in cooperation with
local jurisdictions and affected communities.
Regional plans also include the addition of new
freeway -to -freeway carpool ramps to the I-405/
I-605 interchange using federal and state funds.
This improvement will connect to interchange
improvements at I-405 and SR-22 as well as
new freeway lanes between I-405 and I-605.
Cost:
The estimated cost to make these I-605 interchange
improvements is $20.0 million.
Project 0
Freeway Service Patrol
Description:
The Freeway Service Patrol (FSP) provides
competitively bid, privately contracted tow
truck service for motorists with disabled vehicles
on the freeway system. This service helps
stranded motorists and quickly clears disabled
vehicles out of the freeway lanes to minimize
congestion caused by vehicles blocking traffic
and passing motorists rubbernecking.
CuTrently Freeway Service Patrol is available on
Orange County freeways Monday through Friday
during peak commuting hours. This project
would assure that this basic level of service
could be continued through 2041. As demand
and congestion levels increase, this project
would also permit service hours to be extended
throughout the day and into the weekend.
Cost:
The estimated cost to support the Freeway
Service Patrol Program for thirty years
beyond 2011 is $150.0 million.
HB -131-
Item 6. - 51
r /
Orange County has more than 6,500 lane miles
Renewed Measure M provides financial incentives
of aging streets and roads, many of which are in
for traffic improvements that cross city and
need of repair, rejuvenation and improvement.
county lines, providing a seamless, county -
Intersections need to be widened, traffic lights
wide transportation system that's friendly to
need to be synchronized, and potholes need to
regional commuters and fair to local residents.
be filled. And, in many cases, to make Orange
County's transportation system work smoothly, we
Better Cooperation
need to add additional lanes to existing streets.
To place a higher priority on cooperative,
collaborative regional decision -making, Renewed
Thirty-two percent of net revenues from the
Measure M creates incentives that encourage traffic
Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment
lights to be coordinated across jurisdictional lines,
Plan is dedicated to maintaining streets,
major street improvements to be better coordinated
fixing potholes, improving intersections and
on a regional basis, and street repair programs to be
widening city streets and county roads.
a high priority countywide. To receive Measure M
funding, cities and the county have to cooperate.
Making the System Work
Making the existing system of streets and roads
The Streets and Roads program in Renewed
work better —by identifying spot intersection
Measure M involves shared responsibilities —local
improvements, filling potholes, repaving worn-
cities and the county set their local priorities
out streets —is the basis of making a countywide
within a competitive, regional framework that
transportation system work. That basis has to be the
rewards cooperation, honors best practices, and
first priority. But to operate a successful, countywide
encourages government agencies to work together.
system of streets and roads, we need more:
street widenings and traffic signals synchronized
countywide. And there's more. Pedestrian safety
near local schools needs to be improved. Traffic flow
must be smoothed. Street repairs must be made
sooner. And, perhaps most importantly, cities and the
county must work together —collaboratively —to
find simple, low-cost traffic solutions.
Item 6. - 52 HB -132-
HB -133- Item 6. - 53
Project 0
Regional Capacity Program
Description:
This program, in combination with local matching
funds, provides a funding source to complete the
Orange County Master Plan of Arterial Highways
(MPAH). The program also provides for intersection
improvements and other projects to help improve
street operations and reduce congestion. The
program allocates funds through a competitive
process and targets projects that help traffic the most
by considering factors such as degree of congestion
relief, cost effectiveness, project readiness, etc.
Local jurisdictions must provide a dollar -for -dollar
match to qualify for funding, but can be rewarded
with lower match requirements if they give
priority to other key objectives, such as better road
maintenance and regional signal synchronization.
Roughly 1,000 miles of new street lanes remain
to be completed, mostly in the form of widening
existing streets to their ultimate planned width.
Completion of the system will result in a more
even traffic flow and efficient system.
Another element of this program is funding for
construction of railroad over or underpass grade
separations where high volume streets are impacted
by freight trains along the Burlington Northern
Santa Fe railroad in northern Orange County.
Cost:
The estimated cost for these street
improvement projects is $1,132.8 million.
Item 6. - 54 HB -134-
HB -135- Item 6. - 55
Project 0
Local Fair Share Program
Description:
This element of the program will provide flexible
funding to help cities and the County of Orange keep
up with the rising cost of repairing the aging street
system. In addition, cities can use these funds for
other local transportation needs such as residential
street projects, traffic and pedestrian safety near
schools, signal priority for emergency vehicles, etc.
This program is intended to augment, rather than
replace, existing transportation expenditures
and therefore cities must meet the following
requirements to receive the funds.
1. Continue to invest General Fund monies
(or other local discretionary monies) for
transportation and annually increase this
commitment to keep pace with inflation.
2. Agree to use Measure M funds for
transportation purposes only, subject
to full repayment and a loss of funding
eligibility for five years for any misuse.
3. Agree to separate accounting for Measure
M funds and annual reporting on
actual Measure M expenditures.
4. Develop and maintain a Pavement
Management Program to ensure timely
street maintenance and submit regular
public reports on the condition of streets.
5. Annually submit a six -year Capital Improvement
Program and commit to spend Measure
M funds within three years of receipt.
6. Agree to assess traffic impacts of new
development and require that new
development pay a fair share of any
necessary transportation improvements.
7. Agree to plan, build and operate major
streets consistent with the countywide
Master Plan of Arterial Highways to ensure
efficient traffic flow across city boundaries.
8. Participate in Traffic Forums with neighboring
jurisdictions to facilitate the implementation and
maintenance of traffic signal synchronization
programs and projects. This requires cities to
balance local traffic policies with neighboring
cities —for selected streets —to promote
more efficient traffic circulation overall.
9. Agree to consider land use planning
strategies that are transit -friendly,
support alternative transportation modes
including bike and pedestrian access and
reduce reliance on the automobile.
The funds under this program are distributed to
cities and the County of Orange by formula once
the cities have fulfilled the above requirements. The
formula will account for population, street mileage
and amount of sales tax collected in each jurisdiction.
Cost:
The estimated cost for this program for
thirty years is $2,039.1 million.
Item 6. - 56 HB -136-
.
71
Building streets, roads and freeways helps fix
The new, localized transit programs will bring
today's traffic problems. Building a visionary transit
competition to local transportation planning,
system that is safe, clean and convenient focuses
creating a marketplace of transportation ideas where
on Orange County's transportation future.
the best ideas emerge and compete for funding. The
plan is to encourage civic entrepreneurship and
Twenty-five percent of net revenues from the
stimulate private involvement and investment.
Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment
Plan is allocated towards building and improving
Transit Investment Criteria
rail and bus transportation in Orange County.
The guiding principles for all transit investments
Approximately twenty percent of the Renewed
are value, safety, convenience and reliability. Each
Measure M funds is allocated to developing a creative
local transit vision will be evaluated against clear
countywide transit program and five percent of
criteria, such as congestion relief, cost-effectiveness,
the revenues will be used to enhance programs for
readiness, connectivity, and a sound operating plan.
senior citizens and for targeted, localized bus service.
All transit expenditures must be consistent with
In terms of bus services, more specialized transit
the safeguards and audit provisions of the Plan.
services, including improved van services and
reduced fares for senior citizens and people with
A New Transit Vision
disabilities, will be provided. Safety at key bus stops
The key element of the Renewed Measure M transit
will be improved. And a network of community -
program is improving the 100-year old Santa Fe
based, mini -bus services will be developed in
rail line, known today as the Los Angeles/San
areas outside of the central county rail corridor.
Diego (LOSSAN) rail corridor, through the heart
of the county. Then, by using this well -established,
operational commuter rail system as a platform for
future growth, existing rail stations will be developed
into regional transportation hubs that can serve as
regional transportation gateways or the centerpiece
3
of local transportation services. A series of new, well -
coordinated, flexible transportation systems, each
one customized to the unique transportation vision
the station serves, will be developed. Creativity
and good financial sense will be encouraged.
Partnerships will be promoted. Transportation
solutions for each transportation hub can range
from monorails to local mini -bus systems to new
technologies. Fresh thinking will be rewarded.
HB -137- Item 6. - 57
Item 6. - 58 HB -138-
Project 0
High Frequency Metrolink Service
Description:
This project will increase rail services within the
county and provide frequent Metrolink service north
of Fullerton to Los Angeles. The project will provide
for track improvements, more trains, and other
related needs to accommodate the expanded service.
This project is designed to build on the successes
of Metrolink and complement service expansion
made possible by the current Measure M. The
service will include upgraded stations and
added parking capacity; safety improvements
and quiet zones along the tracks; and frequent
shuttle service and other means, to move
arriving passengers to nearby destinations.
The project also includes funding for
improving grade crossings and constructing
over or underpasses at high volume arterial
streets that cross the Metrolink tracks.
Cost:
The estimated cost of capital and
operations is $1,129.8 million.
Project
Transit Extensions to Metrolink
Description:
Frequent service in the Metrolink corridor provides
a high capacity transit system linking communities
within the central core of Orange County. This
project will establish a competitive program for local
jurisdictions to broaden the reach of the rail system
to other activity centers and communities. Proposals
for extensions must be developed and supported
by local jurisdictions and will be evaluated against
well-defined and well-known criteria as follows:
• Traffic congestion relief
• Project readiness, with priority given
to projects that can be implemented
within the first five years of the Plan
• Local funding commitments and
the availability of right-of-way
• Proven ability to attract other financial
partners, both public and private
• Cost-effectiveness
• Proximity to jobs and population centers
• Regional as well as local benefits
• Ease and simplicity of connections
• Compatible, approved land uses
• Safe and modern technology
• A sound, long-term operating plan
This project shall not be used to fund transit
routes that are not directly connected to or that
would be redundant to the core rail service on
the Metrolink corridor. The emphasis shall be
on expanding access to the core rail system and
on establishing connections to communities and
major activity centers that are not immediately
adjacent to the Metrolink corridor. It is intended
that multiple transit projects be funded through
"-eject R cost estimate amended on Decemh
1113.139_ Item 6. - 59
a competitive process and no single project may
be awarded all of the funds under this program.
These connections may include a variety of
transit technologies such as conventional bus,
bus rapid transit or high capacity rail transit
systems as long as they can be fully integrated
and provide seamless transition for the users.
Cost:
The estimated cost to implement this program
over thirty years is $1,000.0 million.
Project 0
Convert Metrolink Station(s) to Regional
Gateways that Connect Orange County
with High -Speed Rail Systems
Description:
This program will provide the local improvements
that are necessary to connect planned
future high-speed rail systems to stations
on the Orange County Metrolink route.
The State of California is currently planning a
high-speed rail system linking northern and
southern California. One line is planned to
terminate in Orange County. In addition, several
magnetic levitation (MAGLEV) systems that
would connect Orange County to Los Angeles
and San Bernardino Counties, including a link
from Anaheim to Ontario airport, are also being
planned or proposed by other agencies.
Cost:
The estimated Measure M share of the cost for these
regional centers and connections is $57.9 million.
Project 0
Expand Mobility Choices for Seniors
and Persons with Disabilities
Description:
This project will provide services and programs
to meet the growing transportation needs of
seniors and persons with disabilities as follows:
One and forty-seven hundredths percent
(1.47%) of net revenues will stabilize
fares and provide fare discounts for
bus services, specialized ACCESS
services and future rail services
One percent of net revenues will be
available to continue and expand local
community van service for seniors through
the existing Senior Mobility Program
One percent will supplement existing
countywide senior non -emergency
medical transportation services
Over the next 30 years, the population age 65
and over is projected to increase by 93 percent.
Demand for transit and specialized transportation
services for seniors and persons with disabilities
is expected to increase proportionately.
Cost:
The estimated cost to provide these programs
over 30 years is $392.8 million.
Item 6. - 60
D--:--4 'r Ind U cost estimates amended on December 14, 2015.
HB -140-
Project 0
Community Based Transit/Circulators
Description:
This project will establish a competitive program
for local jurisdictions to develop local bus transit
services such as community based circulators,
shuttles and bus trolleys that complement regional
bus and rail services, and meet needs in areas not
adequately served by regional transit. Projects will
need to meet performance criteria for ridership,
connection to bus and rail services, and financial
viability to be considered for funding. All projects
must be competitively bid, and they cannot
duplicate or compete with existing transit services.
Cost:
The estimated cost of this project is $226.5 million.
Project 0
Safe Transit Stops
Description:
This project provides for passenger amenities at
100 busiest transit stops across the County. The
stops will be designed to ease transfer between
bus lines and provide passenger amenities
such as improved shelters, lighting, current
information on bus and train timetables and arrival
times, and transit ticket vending machines.
Cost:
The estimated cost of this project is $25.0 million.
ier MENa
Item 6. - 61
h-
26 ,
\
i
i
ga
Every day, more than 70 million gallons of oily
The environmental cleanup program is designed to
pollution, litter, and dirty contamination washes
supplement, not supplant, existing transportation -
off streets, roads and freeways and pours onto
related water quality programs. This clean-up
Orange County waterways and beaches. When
program must improve, and not replace, existing
it rains, the transportation -generated pollution
pollution reduction efforts by cities, the county,
increases tenfold, contributing to the increasing
and special districts. Funds will be awarded
number of beach closures and environmental
to the highest priority programs that improve
hazards along the Orange County coast.
water quality, keep our beaches and streets clean,.
and reduce transportation -generated pollution
Prior to allocation of funds for freeway, street and
along Orange County's scenic coastline.
transit projects, two percent of gross revenues
from the Renewed Measure M Transportation
Investment Plan is set aside to protect Orange
County beaches from transportation -generated
pollution (sometimes called "urban runoff')
and improving ocean water quality.
Countywide Competitive Program
Measure M Environmental Cleanup funds will
be used on a countywide, competitive basis
to meet federal Clean Water Act standards for
controlling transportation -generated pollution by
funding nationally recognized Best Management
Practices, such as catch basins with state-of-
the-art biofiltration systems; or special roadside
j
landscaping systems called bioswales that filter
oil runoff from streets, roads and freeways.
II
i
i
i
Aw
Item 6. - 62 HB -142-
Project 0
Environmental Cleanup
Description:
Implement street and highway related water
quality improvement programs and projects that
will assist Orange County cities, the County
of Orange and special districts to meet federal
Clean Water Act standards for urban runoff.
The Environmental Cleanup monies may be used for
water quality improvements related to both existing
and new transportation infrastructure, including
capital and operations improvements such as:
• Catch basin screens, filters and inserts
• Roadside bioswales and biofiltration channels
• Wetlands protection and restoration
• Continuous Deflective Separation (CDS) units
• Maintenance of catch basins and bioswales
• Other street -related "Best Management Practices"
for capturing and treating urban runoff
This program is intended to augment, not replace
existing transportation related water quality
expenditures and to emphasize high -impact
capital improvements over local operations and
maintenance costs. In addition, all new freeway,
street and transit capital projects will include water
quality mitigation as part of project scope and cost.
27
The Environmental Cleanup program is
subject to the following requirements:
• Development of a comprehensive countywide
capital improvement program for transportation
related water quality improvements
• A competitive grant process to award funds to
the highest priority, most cost-effective projects
• A matching requirement to leverage
other federal, state and local funds
for water quality improvements
• A maintenance of effort requirement to
ensure that funds augment, not replace
existing water quality programs
• Annual reporting on actual expenditures and an
assessment of the water quality benefits provided
• A strict limit on administrative costs
and a requirement to spend funds
within three years of receipt
• Penalties for misuse of any of the
Environmental Cleanup funds
Cost:
The estimated cost for the Environmental Cleanup
program is $237.2 million. In addition it is
estimated that new freeway, road and transit projects
funded by the Renewed Measure M Transportation
Investment Plan will include more than $165
million for mitigating water quality impacts.
HB -143- Item 6. - 63
N
\ 3.
OR
When new transportation dollars are approved,
Back to the Voters
they should go for transportation and transportation
Of course, over the next 30 years, things will change.
alone. No bait -and -switch. No using transportation
Minor adjustments can be made by a 2/3 vote of the
dollars for other purposes. The original
Taxpayer Oversight Committee and a 2/3 vote of
Measure M went solely for transportation. The
the Orange County Local Transportation Authority
Renewed Measure M will be just as airtight.
Board of Directors. Major changes must be taken
back to voters for authorization. And, every ten
And there will be no hidden costs in the program.
years, and more frequently if necessary, the Orange
County Local Transportation Authority must
Prior to allocation of funds for freeway, street and
conduct a thorough examination of the Renewed
transit projects, one percent of gross revenues from
Measure M Investment Plan and determine if
the Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment
major changes should be submitted to the voters.
Plans is set aside for audits, safeguards, and taxpayer
protection. By state law, one and one half percent of
There are other important taxpayer safeguards,
the gross sales taxes generated by Measure M must be
all designed to insure the integrity of the voter -
paid to the California State Board of Equalization for
authorized plans. But each is focused on one
collecting the countywide one-half percent sales tax
goal: guaranteeing that new transportation
that funds the Transportation Investment Program.
dollars are devoted to solving Orange County's
traffic problems and that no transportation
Special Trust Fund
dollars are diverted to anything else.
I
To guarantee transportation dollars are used for
transportation purposes, all funds must be kept in
a special trust fund. An independent, outside audit
of this fund will protect against cheaters who try to
use the transportation funds for purposes other than
specified transportation uses. A severe punishment
will disqualify any agency that cheats from
receiving Measure M funds for a five-year period.
The annual audits, and annual reports detailing
project progress, will be sent to Orange County
taxpayers every year and will be reviewed in
public session by a special Taxpayer Oversight
Committee that can raise fiscal issues, ask
tough questions, and must independently
certify, on an annual basis, that transportation
dollars have been spent strictly according to
the Renewed Measure M Investment Plan.
40�
Item 6. - 64 HB -144-
Taxpayer Safeguards and Audits
Description:
Implement and maintain strict taxpayer
safeguards to ensure that the Renewed Measure
M Transportation Investment Plan is delivered
as promised. Restrict administrative costs to
one percent (1%) of total tax revenues and state
collection of the tax as prescribed in state law
[currently one -and -one-half (1.5%) percent].
Administration of the Transportation Investment
Plan and all spending is subject to the following
specific safeguards and requirements:
Oversight
• All spending is subject to an
annual independent audit
• Spending decisions must be annually
reviewed and certified by an independent
Taxpayer Oversight Committee
• An annual report on spending and
progress in implementing the Plan
must be submitted to taxpayers
Integrity of the Plan
• No changes to the Plan can be made
without review and approval by 2/3 vote
of the Taxpayer Oversight Committee
• Major changes to the Plan such as deleting
a project or shifting projects among major
spending categories (Freeways, Streets &
Roads, Transit, Environmental Cleanup)
must be ratified by a majority of voters
• The Plan must be subject at least every ten
years to public review and assessment of
progress in delivery, public support and
changed circumstances. Any significant
proposed changes to the Plan must be approved
by the Taxpayer Oversight Committee
and ratified by a majority of voters.
Fund Accounting
• All tax revenues and interest earned must be
deposited and maintained in a separate trust
fund. Local jurisdictions that receive allocations
must also maintain them in a separate fund.
• All entities receiving tax funds must
report annually on expenditures and
progress in implementing projects
• At any time, at its discretion, the Taxpayer
Oversight Committee may conduct independent
reviews or audits of the spending of tax funds
• The elected Auditor/Controller of Orange
County must annually certify that spending
is in accordance with the Plan
Spending Requirements
• Local jurisdictions receiving funds must
abide by specific eligibility and spending
requirements detailed in the Streets & Roads and
Environmental Cleanup components of the Plan
• Funds must be used only for transportation
purposes described in the Plan. The penalty
for misspending is full repayment and loss of
funding eligibility for a period of five years.
• No funds may be used to replace
private developer funding committed
to any project or improvement
• Funds shall augment, not replace existing funds
• Every effort shall be made to maximize matching
state and federal transportation dollars
HB -145-
Item 6. - 65
Item 6. - 66 HB -146-
I-5 Santa Ana Freeway Interchange Improvements
0
$470.0
I-5 Santa Ana/San Diego Freeway Improvements
'
1,185.2
SR-22 Garden Grove Freeway Access Improvements
120.0
SR-55 Costa Mesa Freeway Improvements
Aft
V
366.0
SR-57 Orange Freeway Improvements
258.7
SR-91 Riverside Freeway Improvements
908.7*
I-405 San Diego Freeway Improvements
Aft Aft
1,392.5*
I-605 Freeway Access Improvements
Alft
20.0
All Freeway Service Patrol
W
150.0
reets & Roads
Regional Capacity Program
Aft
•
$1,132.8
Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Programoft
453.1
Local Fair Share Program
'
2,039.1
Projects
High Frequency Metrolink Service
$1,129.8*
Transit Extensions to Metrolink
Aft
V
1,000.0
Metrolink Gateways
0
57.9*
Expand Mobility Choices for Seniors and Persons with Disabilities
392.8*
Community Based Transit/Circulators
0
226.5
Safe Transit Stops
Cleanup
0
25.0
Clean Up Highway and Street Runoff that Pollutes Beaches
AVA
I W
$237.2
Collect Sales Taxes (State charges required by law) I I $178.0
Oversight and Annual Audits 118.6
*AStPrick nnt— project estimates that have been amender' '
1-113 -147- Item 6. - 67