Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Adopt a Seven-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for fis
32 �/�vv r City of Huntington Beach File #: 18-135 MEETING DATE: 7/2/2018 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY: Fred A. Wilson, City Manager PREPARED BY: Travis K. Hopkins, PE, Director of Public Works Subject: Adopt a Seven-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for fiscal years 2018/2019 through 2024/2025 for compliance with renewed Measure M eligibility requirements Statement of Issue: In order to remain eligible to receive Measure M2 Program funding, the City must submit to the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) an adopted seven-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) in compliance with the renewed Measure M eligibility requirements. Financial Impact: No additional funding is required for this resolution. Annual M2 local fair-share allocation is approximately $3.4 million for the City. Recommended Action: Adopt the Seven-Year Capital Improvement Program (FY 2018/2019 through 2024/2025) attached as Exhibit "A" for compliance with renewed Measure M eligibility requirements. Alternative Action(s): Do not adopt the attached Seven-Year CIP for Measure M eligibility and forego M2 funding eligibility. This action would result in the loss of $3.4 million for the next fiscal year, and the loss of allocated and potential grant funding for traffic and street improvement projects. Analysis: On November 6, 1990, the Orange County voters approved the original Measure M, the revised Traffic Improvement and Growth Management Ordinance, for 20 years (1991-2011). On November 7, 2006, the Orange County voters approved Renewed Measure M. Renewed Measure M is a 30- year (2011-2041 ), multi-billion dollar program extension of the original Measure M. Renewed Measure M net revenues are generated from the transactions and use tax, plus any interest or other earnings after allowable deductions. Net revenues may be allocated to local jurisdictions for a variety of programs identified in Ordinance No. 3. Compliance with the eligibility requirements established in Ordinance No. 3 must be established and maintained in order for local jurisdictions to receive Measure M net revenues. City of Huntington Beach Page 1 of 2 Printed on 6/27/2018 32 powered by LegistarTl 33 File #: 18-135 MEETING DATE: 7/2/2018 The City must satisfy certain requirements to maintain eligibility in order to receive funding from OCTA. A key requirement is that the City adopt a Seven-Year CIP for the fiscal years 2018/2019 through 2024/2025, in compliance with the renewed Measure M eligibility requirements. The Seven- Year CIP, which is attached as Exhibit "A," identifies all projects, currently and potentially, funded by OCTA Measure M2 funds. The following projects are identified in the attached Exhibit "A": 1 . Adams Ave. Traffic Signal Synchronization and Communication Equipment Upgrades 2. Arterial Rehab FY 18/19 (Edinger, Saybrook, Algonquin, Slater, Newland, Graham, Delaware, Atlanta) 3. Arterial Rehab FY 17/18 (Heil, Atlanta, Indianapolis) 4. Arterial Rehab FY 17/18 (Heil, Indianapolis, Slater, Edinger, Springdale) 5. Atlanta Ave. Widening from Huntington St. to Delaware St. 6. Magnolia St. and Brookhurst St. Bridge Preventive Maintenance 7. Brookhurst St. Synchronization 8. City of Huntington Beach Seasonal Transit Circulator 9. Citywide Concrete Replacements 10.General Street Maintenance for Public Works 11 .Goldenwest St. Traffic Signal Synchronization and Communication Equipment Upgrades 12. Huntington Beach Catch Basin Retrofit Project 13. Huntington Beach Northwest Catch Basin Retrofit Project 14. Huntington Harbour Marina Trash Skimmers 15. Magnolia St. Synchronization 16. McFadden/Edwards and Heil/Algonquin Catch Basin Retrofit Project 17. Residential Curb Ramp Project 18.Citywide Residential Overlay 19. Utica Bicycle Blvd from Main St. to Beach Blvd. 20.Warner Ave. Traffic Signal Synchronization and Communication Equipment Upgrades Environmental Status: Not applicable for this action. Strategic Plan Goal: Enhance and maintain infrastructure Attachment(s): 1. Exhibit "A," Measure M Seven-Year CIP (FY 2018/2019 through 2024/2025) 2. OCTA Ordinance No. 3 City of Huntington Beach Page 2 of 2 Printed on 6/27/2018 33 powered by LegisiarT'l 34 EX IBIT " 34 6/12/2018 35 Measure M Seven Year Capital Improvement Program (Sorted by Project Name) Fiscal Years 2018/2019 through 2024/2025 Agency: Huntington Beach Project Name: Adams Avenue Traffic Signal Synchronization and FUND NAME PERCENT ESTIMATED COST PROJECTED COST NOTES Communication Enuinment Unorades Other 2.68 $268 $268 Annual Maintenance Project Limits: From Beach Boulevard to City Boundary(Multi AQMD 97.32 $9,732 $9,732 Jurisdictional) Project Number: 13-OCTA-TSP-3663 $10,000 $10,000 Type of Work(TOW): Systems Management TOW Description: Communications intertie between agency and Caltrans to manage traffic Project Description: Provide operational and infrastructure improvements. Project Phase 1B199 20/21 iJ ; 2 4 240 Estitated cost PrQleded Cost E $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 R $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 C/I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 O&M $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 Agency: Huntington Beach Project Name: Arterial Rehabilation FY 18/19 FUND NAME PERCENT ESTIMATED COST PROJECTED COST NOTES General Fund 10.48 $700,000 $700,000 Project Limits: See Project Description M2 LFS 28.44 $1,900,000 $1,900,000 Project Number: Other 11.97 $800,000 $800,000 City Infrastructure Fund Other 49.11 $3,280,923 $3,280.923 RMRA Type of Work(TOW): Road Maintenance $6,680,923 $6,680,923 TOW Description: Rehabilitation of roadway Project Description: 1)Edinger(Graham-Bolsa Chica);2) Saybrook(Heil-Edinger);3)Algonquin(Warner-Heil); 4)Slater(Beach-Gothard); 5)N ewla nd(Yorktown-Garfield); 6)Graha m(W arner-Springdale); 7)Delaware(Main-Ellis); Project Phase 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 24/25 Estimated Cost Proiected Cost E $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50.000 $50 000 R $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 C/I $6,630,923 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,630,923 $6,630,923 O&M $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,680,923 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,680,923 $6,680,923 6/12/2018 36 Measure M 2 Seven Year Capital Improvement Program (Sorted by Project Name) Fiscal Years 2018/2019 through 2024/2025 Agency: Huntington Beach Project Name: Arterial Rehabilitation FY 17/18 FUND NAME PERCENT ESTIMATED COST PROJECTED COST NOTES General Fund 22.73 $0 $0 Project Limits: Heil Ave(Edwards-Springdale), Atlanta Ave M2 LFS 45A5 $0 $0 (Delaware-Beach),and Indianapolis Ave Project Number: (Reach-Mannolia) Other 27.27 $0 $0 Infrastructure Fund Prop 42 4.55 $0 $0 Type of Work(TOW): Road Maintenance $0 $0 TOW Description: Rehabilitation of roadway Project Description: Rehabilitate Arterial's Heil Avenue,Atlanta Avenue, and Indianapolis Avenue.This a carryover project for FY18/19.Funding shown in prior years. Proiect Phase 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 24/25 Estimated Cost Proiected Cost E $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 R $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 C/I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 O&M $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $o $0 $o $o Agency: Huntington Beach Project Name: Arterial Rehabilitation FY 17/18 FUND NAME PERCENT ESTIMATED COST PROJECTED COST NOTES General Fund 2116 $0 $0 Project Limits: 1)Springdale-Bolsa M2 LFS 55 02 $0 so Chica;2)Newla nd-Beach;3)Goldenwest-Gothard;4)E Project Number: (iwards-Snrinadale-5)W2rner-Slater Other 23.82 $0 $0 RMRA $0 $0 Type of work(TOW): Road Maintenance TOW Description: Rehabilitation of roadway Project Description: Rehabilitate 1)Heil,2)lndianapolis,3)Slater,4)Edinger, 5)Springdale(carry-over from FY 2017-18) Proiect Phase 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22123 23124 24/25 Estimated Cost Projected Cost E $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 so so $0 R $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 so C/I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 O&M $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 so $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 6/12/2018 37 Measure M 3 Seven Year Capital Improvement Program(Sorted by Project Name) Fiscal Years 2018/2019 through 2024/2025 Agency: Huntington Beach Project Name: Atlanta Avenue Widenina FUND NAME PERCENT ESTIMATED COST PROJECTED COST NOTES M2 ACE 75.00 $0 $0 Project Limits: Atlanta Avenue(Huntington St.to Delaware St.) General Fund 25.00 $0 $0 25%Match to previously approved M2 ACE Project Number: 15-HBCH-ACE-3770 $0 $0 Type of work(TOW): Road Widening TOW Description: Add 1 lane to existing roadway in project limits Project Description: This project will widen the south side of Atlanta Avenue. This project is carryover from FY 15/16 CIP. Project Phase 18/19 19/20 02 /21 21/22 22/23 23/24 24/25 Estimated Cost Proiected Cost E $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 so SO $0 R $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 so $0 $0 C/I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 so $0 O&M $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 Agency: Huntington Beach Project Name: Bridae Preventative Maintenance FUND NAME PERCENT ESTIMATED COST PROJECTED COST NOTES Gas Tax 16.94 $0 so Project Limits: Magnolia Street and Brookhurst Street Bridge at M2 LFS 1.08 $0 $0 Pacific Coast Hiahwav Project Number: Other 72.74 $0 so Water Fund Prop 42 9.24 $0 $0 Type of Work(TOW): Road Maintenance $o $o TOW Description: Bridge Project Description: Provide Design and Construction of City Bridges including Roadway. This project was included as carry-over from FY 17/18 CIP. Project Phase 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 24/25 Estimated Cost Projected Cost E $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 R $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 C/I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 O&M $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 6/12/2018 38 Measure M 4 Seven Year Capital Improvement Program (Sorted by Project Name) Fiscal Years 2018/2019 through 2024/2025 Agency: Huntington Beach Project Name: Brookhurst Street Svnchronization FUND NAME PERCENT ESTIMATED COST PROJECTED COST NOTES General Fund 1.19 $10,000 $10,277 Project Limits: Garfield Avenue to Pacific Coast Highway M2 TSSP 73.36 $618,757 $635,877 Project Number: 16-OCTA-TSP-3794 AQMD 25.46 $214,733 $220,674 $843,490 $866,828 Type of Work(TOW): Traffic Signals TOW Description: Interconnect traffic signals to improve coordination and communication Project Description: Provide operational and infrastructure improvements. This is a corridor project managed by OCTA and funding reflects planned improvements within Huntington Beach only.Carry-over from FY 17/18 Project Phase 18119 19120 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 24/25 Estimated Cost Projected Cost E $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 R $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 C/I $0 $833,490 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $833,490 $856.828 O&M $0 $0 $5,000 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $0 $833,490 $5,000 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $843.490 $866,828 Agency: Huntington Beach Project Name: City of Huntinaton Beach Seasonal Transit Circulator FUND NAME PERCENT ESTIMATED COST PROJECTED COST NOTES General Fund 10.00 $61 274 $61,274 Project Limits: Citywide M2 Transit-V 90.00 $551,451 $551,451 Project Number: 16-HBCH-CBT-3826 $612,725 $612,725 Type of Work(TOW): Transit TOW Description: New Service Project Description: Provide Seasonal Transit Service by adding additional free local shuttle service connections within the City from Memorial Day to Labor Day and selected weekends. Project Phase 18119 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 24/25 Estimated Cost Projected Cost E $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 R $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 G/1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 O&M $122,545 $122,545 $122,545 $122,545 $122,545 $0 $0 $612,725 $612,725 $122,545 $122,645 $122,545 $122,646 $122,545 $0 $0 $612,725 $612,725 6/12/2018 39 Measure M 5 Seven Year Capital Improvement Program (Sorted by Project Name) Fiscal Years 2018/2019 through 2024/2025 Agency: Huntington Beach Project Name: concrete Replacements FUND NAME PERCENT ESTIMATED COST PROJECTED COST NOTES General Fund 10000 $1.250.000 $1,321,988 Project Limits: Citywide $1,250,000 $1,321,988 Project Number: Type of Work(TOW): Pedestrian TOW Description: Reconstruction or rehabilitation of sidewalk Project Description: Replace damaged concrete sidewalks or curb and gutter throughout the City. This is annual program with locations selected throughout Huntington Beach at streets where an overlay is required by PMP. Project Phase 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23124 24/25 Estimated Cast Proiected Cost E $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 R $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 C/i $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $1,250,000 $1,321,988 O&M $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $1,250,000 $1,321,988 Agency: Huntington Beach Project Name: General Street Maintenance for Public Works FUND NAME PERCENT ESTIMATED COST PROJECTED COST NOTES M2 LFS 100.00 $7,000,000 $7,403,131 Project Limits: Citywide $7,000,000 $7,403,131 Project Number: Type of Work(TOW): Pedestrian TOW Description: Reconstruction or rehabilitation of sidewalk Project Description: Annual maintenance work for concrete,potholes and failed asphalt;O&M of traffic signals, replacement of striping and signage,including engineering and inspection as needed on an annual basis. Proiect Phase 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 24/25 Estimated Cost Projected Cost F $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 R $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 C/1 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $0 $0 $7,000,000 $7,403,131 O&M $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $0 $0 $7,000,000 $7,403,131 6/12/2018 40 Measure M 6 Seven Year Capital Improvement Program (Sorted by Project Name) Fiscal Years 2018/2019 through 2024/2025 Agency: Huntington Beach Project Name: Goldenwest Street Traffic Signal Synchronization FUND NAME PERCENT ESTIMATED COST PROJECTED COST NOTES and Communication Fouioment Unorades M2 TSSP 78.02 $1.560 S1 560 Project Limits: Goldenwest St.from State Route 22 to Pacific Coast AQMD 21.98 $440 $440 Hiahwav Project Number: 11-OCTA-TSP-3554 $2,000 $2.000 Type of Work(TOW): Traffic Signals TOW Description: Coordinate signals within project limits Project Description: Provide operational and infrastructure upgrades including signal timing and installation of fiber optic cable along Goldenwest Street.Multiagency project includes Caltrans and City of Westminster.CO project for FY18/19. Project Phase 18/19 19/20 20121 21/22 22/23 23/24 24/25 Estimated Cost Proiected Cost E $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 so so R $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 so so C/I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 so O&M $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,000 $2.000 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $2,000 $2,000 Agency: Huntington Beach Project Name: Huntinaton Beach Catch Basin Retrofit Proiect FUND NAME PERCENT ESTIMATED COST PROJECTED COST NOTES General Fund 10000 $20,000 $20.000 Project Limits: City-wide $20,000 $20,000 Project Number: 14-HBCH-ECP-3742 Type of Work(TOW): Environmental Cleanup TOW Description: Catchment Retrofit Project Description: Maintenance of 84 catch basins retrofitted with Bio Clean Round Curb Inlet Filters. Proiect Phase 18/19 19120 20/21 21/22 22123 23/24 24/25 Estimated Cost Proiected Cost E $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 R $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 C/I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 O&M $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $20,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $20,000 6/12/2018 41 Measure M 7 Seven Year Capital Improvement Program(Sorted by Project Name) Fiscal Years 2018/2019 through 2024/2025 Agency: Huntington Beach Project Name: Huntington Beach Northwest Catch Basin Retrofit FUND NAME PERCENT ESTIMATED COST PROJECTED COST NOTES Proiect General Fund 10000 $20,000 $20,000 Project Limits: City-wide in Northwest Part of City $20,000 $20,000 Project Number: 13-HBCH-ECP-3687 Type of work(TOW): Environmental Cleanup TOW Description: Catchment Retrofit Project Description: Maintenance of 126 catch basins retrofitted with Bio Clean Round Curb Inlet Filters and Skimmer Box. Proiect Phase 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 24/25 Estimated Cost Projected Cost E $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 R $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 C/I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 O&M $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $20,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $0 0 $20,000 $20,000 Agency: Huntington Beach Project Name: Huntinaton Harbour Marina Trash Skimmers FUND NAME PERCENT ESTIMATED COST PROJECTED COST NOTES M2 ECP-1 75.00 s0 $0 Project Limits: Various Locations within Huntington Harbour General Fund 12.50 $0 $0 Project Number: 16-HBCH-ECP-3852 Other 12.50 $0 $0 Donations County $0 $0 Type of work(TOW): Environmental Cleanup TOW Description: Marina Trash Skimmer Project Description: Marian Trash Skimmers will be installed in various locations Project Phase 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 24/25 Estimated Cost Proiected Cost E $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 s0 $0 R $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 s0 $0 C/I $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 so $0 $0 O&M $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 6/12/2018 42 Measure M 8 Seven Year Capital Improvement Program (Sorted by Project Name) Fiscal Years 2018/2019 through 2024/2025 Agency: Huntington Beach Project Name: Magnolia Street Synchronization FlUND NAME ERCENT, STIMATIEDCOST ;' PRO.ec-Irt h GCIST NOTES General Fund 1.36 $10,000 $10,276 Project Limits: from Garfield Avenue to Pacific Coast Highway M2 TSSP 71.42 $524,364 $538,846 Project Number: 16-OCTA-TSP-3795 AQMD 27.21 $199.789 $205,307 $734,153 $754,429 Type of Work(TOW): Traffic Signals TOW Description: Interconnect traffic signals to improve coordination and communication Project Description: Provide operational and infrastructure improvements; carry-over from FY 17/18 PrcnOct Fs 18119 ? - #imateti fast P o�retf Gait 1 , ra; �; ' �.. �. .� E $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 R $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 C/1 $0 $724,153 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $724,153 $744,429 O&M $0 $0 $5,000 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $0 $724,153 $5,000 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $734,153 $754,429 Agency: Huntington Beach .Project Name: McFadden/Edwards and Heil/Algonquin Catch Basin FUND NAME OFRCENT ESTIMATED COST PROJECTED COST NOTES Retrofit Proiect General Fund 100.00 $20,300 $20,300 Project Limits: City-wide $20,300 $20,300 Project Number: 11-HBCH-ECP-3573 Type of Work(TOW): Environmental Cleanup TOW Description: Automatic Retractable Screen and other debris screens or inserts Project Description: Provide maintenance for catch basin screens. traJettP'ase �ur, �" -h Via. ' Estittdfitft IrciectedCant E $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 R $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 C/I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 O&M $5,075 $5,075 $5,075 $5,075 $0 $0 $0 $20,300 $20,300 $5,075 $5,075 $5,075 $5,075 $0 $0 $0 $20,300 $20,300 6/12/2018 43 Measure M 9 Seven Year Capital Improvement Program(Sorted by Project Name) Fiscal Years 2018/2019 through 2024/2025 Agency: Huntington Beach Project Name: Residential Curb Ramo Proiect FUND NAME PERCENT ESTIMATED COST PROJECTED COST NOTES CDBG 100.00 S1.375,000 $1.452,747 Project Limits: Ramps to be installed throughout City Gas Tax 0.00 $0 $0 Project Number: $1,375,000 $1,452,747 Type of Work(TOW): Pedestrian TOW Description: Installation of ADA access ramps Project Description: Install ADA Access Ramps. This is an annual project that will install Ramps at locations where we are providing an overlay to adjacent street. Proiect Phase 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 24/25 Estimated Cost Projected Cost E $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $0 $0 $25,000 $25,000 R $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 C/I $270,000 $270,000 $270,000 $270,000 $270,000 $0 $0 $1,350,000 $1,427,747 O&M $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $275,000 $276,000 $275,000 $275,000 $275,000 $0 $0 $1,375,000 $1,462,747 Agency: Huntington Beach Project Name: Residential Overlav FUND NAME PERCENT ESTIMATED COST PROJECTED COST NOTES Gas Tax 100.00 S6.300.000 S6,477.199 Project Limits: Citywide Other 0.00 SO SO Project Number: Other 0.00 $0 SO $6,300,000 $6.477.199 Type of Work(TOW): Road Maintenance TOW Description: Rehabilitation of roadway Project Description: Provide cold mill and overlay of various streets throughout Huntington Beach. This annual project will provide street overlay rehabilitation based on the PMP ratings. Protect Phase 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 24/25 Estimated Cost Projected Cost E $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 $30,000 R $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 C/I $2,090,000 $2,090,000 $2,090,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,270,000 $6,447,199 O&M $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,100,000 $2,100,000 $2,100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,300,000 $6,477,199 6/12/2018 44 Measure M 10 Seven Year Capital Improvement Program (Sorted by Project Name) Fiscal Years 2018/2019 through 2024/2025 Agency: Huntington Beach Project Name: Utica Bicycle Boulevard from Main Street to Beach FUND NAME PERCENT ESTIMATED COST PROJECTED COST NOTES Boulevard Prop 42 0.00 $0 $0 Project Limits: Utica Avenue from Main Street to Beach Boulevard BCIP 100.00 $0 $0 Project Number: $0 $0 Type of Work(TOW): Bikeways TOW Description: Widening of existing bike route Project Description: Construct a'Bicycle Boulevard",where bicycling is emphasized over motor vehicle use.Project includes a new traffic signal,curb bulb-outs,signing& striping improvements. This project is a carryover for FY18/19. Project Phase 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 E $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 R $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 C/I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 O&M $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o Agency: Huntington Beach Project Name: Warner Avenue Traffic Signal Synchronization and FUND NAME PERCENT ESTIMATED COST PROJECTED COST NOTES Communication Fouinment Uoarade M2 TSSP 79.17 $3 959 S3 959 OCTA anticipated expenditures Project Limits: Warner Avenue from Pacific Coast Hwy to Red Hill AQMD 20.83 $1 C41 S l 041 Avenue Project Number: 11-OCTA-TSP-3558 $5,000 $5.000 Type of Work(TOW): Traffic Signals TOW Description: Coordinate signals within project limits Project Description: Provide operational and infrastructure upgrades including signal timing and installation of fiber optic along Warner Avenue. Includes Caltrans and Cities of Fountain Valley,Santa Ana and Tustin.Carryover for FY18/19. Project Phase 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 24125 Estimated Cost Projected Cost E $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 S0 R $0 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 C/I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 O&M $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 $5,000 45 ORANGE COUNTY LOCAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY ORDINANCE NO. 3 J U LY 24, 2006 AMENDED: November 9, 2012 November 25, 2013 December 14, 2015 (corrected March 14, 2016) Orange County Local Transportation Authority 550 South Main Street P.O. Box 14184 Orange, CA 92863-1584 Tel: (714) 560-6282 45 46 Measure M2 Amendments Transportation Investment Plan Amendments 1. November 9, 2012 • Reallocation of Funds within Freeway Program Between SR-91 and 1-405 2. December 14, 2015 (corrected March 14, 2016) • Closeout of Project T and Reallocation of Remaining Funds within Transit Program between Metrolink Service Expansion (Project R) and Fare Stabilization Program (Project U). Corrected amendment language was presented to the Board on March 14, 2016. Ordinance Amendment 1 . November 25, 2013 • Strengthens the eligibility and selection process for TOC members to prevent any person with a financial conflict of interest from serving as a member. Also requires currently elected or appointed officers who are applying to serve on the TOC to complete an "Intent to Resign" form. 2. December 14, 2015 (corrected March 14, 2016) • Accounts for additional funding from Project T allocated to the Fare Stabilization Program by changing Attachment B language to reflect a 1 .47% delegation (rather than 1%) of Project U funding towards Fare Stabilization. Corrected amendment language was presented to the Board on March 14, 2016. 46 47 TABLE OF CONTENTS Ordinance No. 3 Page Preamble ............................................................................................... 1 Section1. Title......................................................................................... 1 Section2. Summary................................................................................ 2 Section 3. Imposition of Retail Transactions and Use Tax ...................... 2 Section 4. Purposes ................................................................................ 2 Section 5. Bonding Authority................................................................... 3 Section 6. Maintenance of Effort Requirements ...................................... 3 Section 7. Administration......................................................................... 4 Section 8. Annual Appropriations Limit.................................................... 4 Section 9. Effective and Operative Dates................................................ 5 Section 10. Safeguards of Use of Revenues............................................. 5 Section 11. Ten-Year Comprehensive Program Review........................... 6 Section 12. Amendments .......................................................................... 6 Section 13. Request for Election ............................................................... 7 Section 14. Effect on Ordinance No. 2 ...................................................... 8 Section 15. Severability............................................................................. 8 ATTACHMENT A — Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment Plan ................................... A-1 ATTACHMENT B - Allocation of Net Revenues Section I. Definitions............................................................................... B-1 47 48 Section II. Requirements......................................................................... B-4 Section III. Requirements for Eligible Jurisdictions................................... B-7 Section IV. Allocation of Net Revenues; General Provisions.................... B-10 Section V. Allocation of Net Revenues; Streets and Roads Programs/Projects....................................................... B-12 Section VI. Allocation of Net Revenues; Transit Programs/ Projects .................................................................................. B-14 Section VII. Allocation of Net Revenues; Environmental Cleanup Projects .................................................................................. B-17 ATTACHMENT C - Taxpayer Oversight Committee Section I. Purpose and Organization...................................................... C-1 Section II. Committee Membership ......................................................... C-1 Section III. Appointment of Members ....................................................... C-2 Section IV. Duties and Responsibilities .................................................... C-4 48 49 Ordinance No. 3 Renewed Measure M Transportation Ordinance and Investment Plan PREAMBLE A. Pursuant to California Public Utilities Code Section 180050, the Orange County Transportation Authority ("Authority") has been designated as the Orange County Local Transportation Authority by the Orange County Board of Supervisors. B. There has been adopted a countywide transportation expenditure plan, referred to as the Orange County Transportation Investment Plan, dated July 24, 2006, pursuant to California Public Utilities Code Section 180206 ("Plan"), which will be administered by the Authority. C. The Plan provides for needed countywide transportation facility and service improvements which will be funded, in part, by a transactions and use tax of one-half of one percent (1/2%). D. Local Transportation Ordinance Number 2 ("Ordinance No. 2") funds transportation facility and service improvements through a transactions and use tax of one- half of one percent (1/2%) that will be imposed through March 31 , 2011 . E. Ordinance No. 3 ("Ordinance") provides for the continuation of the existing Ordinance No. 2 transactions and use tax of one-half of one percent (1/2%) for an additional period of thirty (30) years to fund transportation facility and service improvements. SECTION 1. TITLE The Ordinance shall be known and may be cited as the Renewed Measure M Transportation Ordinance and Investment Plan. The word "Ordinance," as used in the Ordinance, shall mean and include Attachment A entitled "Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment Plan," Attachment B entitled "Allocation of Net Revenues," and Attachment C entitled "Taxpayer Oversight Committee," which Attachments A, B and C are attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. 49 50 SECTION 2. SUMMARY The Ordinance provides for the implementation of the Orange County Transportation Investment Plan, which will result in countywide transportation improvements for freeways, highways, local streets and roads, bus and rail transit, transportation-related water quality ("Environmental Cleanup"), and transit services for seniors and disabled persons. These needed improvements will be funded by the continuation of the one-half of one percent (1/2%) transaction and use tax for a period of thirty years. The revenues shall be deposited in a special fund and used solely for the identified improvements authorized by the Ordinance. SECTION 3. IMPOSITION OF RETAIL TRANSACTIONS AND USE TAX Subject to approval by the electors, the Authority hereby imposes, in the incorporated and unincorporated territories of Orange County ("County"), in accordance with the provisions of Part 1 .6 (commencing with Section 7251) of Division 2 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code and Division 19 (commencing with Section 180000) of the California Public Utilities Code, continuance of the existing retail transactions and use tax at the rate of one-half of one percent (1/2%) commencing April 1, 2011, for a period of thirty years. This tax shall be in addition to any other taxes authorized by law, including any existing or future state or local sales tax or transactions and use tax. The imposition, administration and collection of the tax shall be in accordance with all applicable statutes, laws, rules and regulations prescribed and adopted by the State Board of Equalization. SECTION 4. PURPOSES All of the gross revenues generated from the transactions and use tax plus any interest or other earnings thereon (collectively, "Revenues"), after the deduction for: (i) amounts payable to the State Board of Equalization for the performance of functions incidental to the administration and operation of the Ordinance, (ii) costs for the administration of the Ordinance as provided herein, (iii) two percent (2%) of the Revenues annually allocated for Environmental Cleanup and (iv) satisfaction of debt service requirements of all bonds issued pursuant to the Ordinance that are not satisfied out of 50 51 separate allocations, shall be defined as "Net Revenues" and shall be allocated solely for the transportation purposes described in the Ordinance. SECTION 5. BONDING AUTHORITY "Pay as you go" financing is the preferred method of financing transportation improvements and operations under the Ordinance. However, the Authority may use bond i financing as an alternative method if the scope of planned expenditures makes "pay as you go" financing unfeasible. Following approval by the electors of the ballot proposition authorizing imposition of the transactions and use tax and authorizing issuance of bonds payable from the proceeds of the tax, bonds may be issued by the Authority pursuant to Division 19 of the Public Utilities Code, at any time before, on, or after the imposition of taxes, and from time to time, payable from the proceeds of the tax and secured by a pledge of revenues from the proceeds of the tax, in order to finance and refinance improvements authorized by the Ordinance. SECTION 6. MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT REQUIREMENTS It is the intent of the Legislature and the Authority that the Net Revenues allocated to a jurisdiction pursuant to the Ordinance for street and road projects shall be used to supplement existing local discretionary funds being used for transportation improvements. Each jurisdiction is hereby required to annually maintain as a minimum no less than the maintenance of effort amount of local discretionary funds required to be expended by the jurisdiction for local street and road purposes pursuant to the current Ordinance No. 2 for Fiscal Year 2010-2011. The maintenance of effort level for each jurisdiction as determined through this process shall be adjusted effective July 1 , 2014 and every three fiscal years thereafter in an amount equal to the percentage change for the Construction Cost Index compiled by Caltrans for the immediately preceding three calendar years, providing that any percentage increase in the maintenance of effort level based on this adjustment shall not exceed the percentage increase in the growth rate in the jurisdiction's general fund revenues over the same time period. The Authority shall not allocate any Net Revenues to any jurisdiction for any fiscal year until that jurisdiction has certified to the Authority that it 51 52 has included in its budget for that fiscal year an amount of local discretionary funds for streets and roads purposes at least equal to the level of its maintenance of effort requirement. An annual independent audit may be conducted by the Authority to verify that the maintenance of effort requirements are being met by the jurisdiction. Any Net Revenues not allocated pursuant to the maintenance of effort requirement shall be allocated to the remaining eligible jurisdictions according to the formula described in the Ordinance. SECTION 7. ADMINISTRATION The Authority shall allocate Revenues to fund facilities, services and projects as specified in the Ordinance, and shall administer the Ordinance consistent with the authority cited. Revenues may be expended by the Authority for salaries, wages, benefits, and overhead and for those services, including contractual services, necessary to carry out its responsibilities pursuant to Division 19; however, in no case shall the Revenues expended for salaries and benefits of Authority administrative staff exceed more than one percent (1%) of the Revenues in any year. The Authority shall use, to the extent possible, existing state, regional and local transportation planning and programming data and expertise, and may, as the law permits, contract with any public agency or private firm for services necessary to carry out the purposes of the Ordinance. Expenses incurred by the Authority for administrative staff and for project implementation, including contracting with public agencies and private firms, shall be identified in the annual report prepared pursuant to Section 10, subpart 8, of the Ordinance. SECTION 8. ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT The annual appropriations limit established pursuant to Article XIII. B. of the California Constitution and Section 180202 of the Public Utilities Code shall be established as $1,123 million for the 2006-07 fiscal year. The appropriations limit shall be subject to adjustment as provided by law. All expenditures of the Revenues are subject to the appropriations limit of the Authority. 52 53 SECTION 9. EFFECTIVE AND OPERATIVE DATES The Ordinance shall be effective on November 8, 2006, if two thirds of the electors vote on November 7, 2006, to approve the ballot measure authorizing the extension of the imposition of the existing tax. The continuance of the imposition of the existing tax authorized by Section 3 of the Ordinance shall be operative on April 1, 2011. SECTION 10. SAFEGUARDS OF USE OF REVENUES The following safeguards are hereby established to ensure strict adherence to the limitations on the use of the Revenues: 1. A transportation special revenue fund (the "Local Transportation Authority Special Revenue Fund") shall be established to maintain all Revenues. 2. The County of Orange Auditor-Controller ("Auditor-Controller"), in the capacity as Chair of the Taxpayer Oversight Committee, shall annually certify whether the Revenues have been spent in compliance with the Ordinance. 3. Receipt, maintenance and expenditure of Net Revenues shall be distinguishable in each jurisdiction's accounting records from other funding sources, and expenditures of Net Revenues shall be distinguishable by program or project. Interest earned on Net Revenues allocated pursuant to the Ordinance shall be expended only for those purposes for which the Net Revenues were allocated. 4. No Net Revenues shall be used by a jurisdiction for other than transportation purposes authorized by the Ordinance. Any jurisdiction which violates this provision must fully reimburse the Authority for the Net Revenues misspent and shall be deemed ineligible to receive Net Revenues for a period of five (5) years. 5. A Taxpayer Oversight Committee ("Committee") shall be established to provide an enhanced level of accountability for expenditure of Revenues under the Ordinance. The Committee will help to ensure that all voter mandates are carried out as required. The roles and responsibilities of the Committee, the selection process for Committee members and related administrative procedures shall be carried out as described in Attachment C. 53 54 6. A performance assessment shall be conducted at least once every three years to evaluate the efficiency, effectiveness, economy and program results of the Authority in satisfying the provisions and requirements of the Investment Summary of the Plan, the Plan and the Ordinance. A copy of the performance assessment shall be provided to the Committee. 7. Quarterly status reports regarding the major projects detailed in the Plan shall be brought before the Authority in public meetings. 8. Annually the Authority shall publish a report on how all Revenues have been spent and on progress in implementing projects in the Plan, and shall publicly report on the findings. SECTION 11. TEN-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM REVIEW At least every ten years the Authority shall conduct a comprehensive review of all projects and programs implemented under the Plan to evaluate the performance of the overall program and may revise the Plan to improve its performance. The review shall include consideration of changes to local, state and federal transportation plans and policies; changes in land use, travel and growth projections; changes in project cost estimates and revenue projections; right-of-way constraints and other project constraints; level of public support for the Plan; and the progress of the Authority and jurisdictions in implementing the Plan. The Authority may amend the Plan based on its comprehensive review, subject to the requirements of Section 12. SECTION 12. AMENDMENTS The Authority may amend the Ordinance, including the Plan, to provide for the use of additional federal, state and local funds, to account for unexpected revenues, or to take into consideration unforeseen circumstances. The Authority shall notify the board of supervisors and the city council of each city in the county and provide them with a copy of the proposed amendments, and shall hold a public hearing on proposed amendments prior to adoption, which shall require approval by a vote of not less than two thirds of the Authority Board of Directors. Amendments shall become effective forty five days after 54 55 adoption. No amendment to the Plan which eliminates a program or project specified on Page 31 of the Plan shall be adopted unless the Authority Board of Directors adopts a finding that the transportation purpose of the program or project to be eliminated will be satisfied by a different program or project. No amendment to the Plan which changes the funding categories, programs or projects identified on page 31 of the Plan shall be adopted unless the amendment to the Plan is first approved by a vote of not less than two thirds of the Committee. In addition, any proposed change in allocations among the four major funding categories of freeway projects, street and road projects, transit projects and Environmental Cleanup projects identified on page 31 of the Plan, or any proposed change of the Net Revenues allocated pursuant to Section IV C 3 of Attachment B for the Local Fair Share Program portion of the Streets and Roads Projects funding category, shall be approved by a simple majority vote of the electors before going into effect. SECTION 13. REQUEST FOR ELECTION Pursuant to California Public Utilities Code Section 180201, the Authority hereby requests that the County of Orange Board of Supervisors call a special election to be conducted by the County of Orange on November 7, 2006, to place the Ordinance before the electors. To avoid any misunderstanding or confusion by Orange County electors, the Authority requests that the Ordinance be identified as "Measure M" on the ballot. The ballot language for the measure shall contain a summary of the projects and programs in the Plan and shall read substantially as follows: "Measure "M," Orange County Transportation Improvement Plan Shall the ordinance continuing Measure M, Orange County's half-cent sales tax for transportation improvements, for an additional 30 years with limited bonding authority to fund the following projects: relieve congestion on the 1-5, 1-405, 22, 55, 57 and 91 freeways; fix potholes and resurface streets; expand Metrolink rail and connect it to local communities; provide transit services, at reduced rates, for seniors and disabled persons; 55 56 synchronize traffic lights in every community; reduce air and water pollution, and protect local beaches by cleaning up oil runoff from roadways; and establish the following taxpayer protections to ensure the funds are spent as directed by the voters: require an independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee to review yearly audits to ensure that voter mandates are met; publish an annual report to the taxpayers on how all funds are spent; and update the transportation improvement plan every 10 years, with voter approval required for major changes; be adopted for the purpose of relieving traffic congestion in Orange County?" SECTION 14. EFFECT ON ORDINANCE NO. 2 The Ordinance is not intended to modify, repeal or alter the provisions of Ordinance No. 2, and shall not be read to supersede Ordinance No. 2. The provisions of the Ordinance shall apply solely to the transactions and use tax adopted herein. If the Ordinance is not approved by the electors of the County, the provisions of Ordinance No. 2 and all powers, duties, and actions taken thereunder shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 15. SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, part, clause or phrase of the Ordinance is for any reason held invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, that holding shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining funds or provisions of the Ordinance, and the Authority declares that it would have passed each part of the /// 56 l 57 1 Ordinance irrespective of the validity of any other part. 2 APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Orange County Local Transportation Authority J 3 on they day of L , 2006. �9 fffJ �f_ 5 Arthur C. Brown, Chairman 6 Orange County Local Transportation Authority 7 ATTEST-. 8 9 y. Zg"-�'-L4 6 L-1 Vvendy Kno' les, Clerk of the Board 10 Orange County Local Transportation Authority 11 1 12 13 14 i 15 i 1 16 ' i 17 18 19 3 20 21 22 23 i 24 i 25 26 27 28 3 '� 213671.11 9 57 58 ATTACHMENT A RE- NEW.P MEAS RE d r.1 JJj JJi J �JJ.1 Jj iJi Approved by voters on November 7, 2006 k 43 NH 4. As amended on December 14, 2015 ORANGE COUNTY LOCAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 550 South Main Street P.O. Box 14184 Orange, CA 92863-1584 (714) 560-5066 www.octa.net U 5edated March 14, 2016 59 59 Table of Contents Introduction............................................................................................2 Overview................................................................................................3 Freeway Projects Overview ..................................................................................................................5 Orange County Freeway Projects Map...............................................................6 1-5 Santa Ana Freeway Interchange Improvements ...........................7 1-5 Santa Ana/San Diego Freeway Improvements .............................8 SR-22 Garden Grove Freeway Access Improvements .............................9 SR-55 Costa Mesa Freeway Improvements ...............................................9 SR-57 Orange Freeway Improvements .....................................................10 SR-91 Riverside Freeway Improvements ..................................................11 1-405 San Diego Freeway Improvements.................................................13 1-605 Freeway Access Improvements........................................................15 All Freeway Service Patrol .....................................................................15 Streets & Roads Projects Overview ................................................................................................................16 Orange County Streets and Roads Projects Map...........................................17 Regional Capacity Program ...............................................................................18 Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program ..........................................19 Local Fair Share Program ...................................................................................20 Transit Projects Overview ................................................................................................................21 Orange County Transit Projects Map ................................................................22 High Frequency Metrolink Service ................................ .................23 Transit Extensions to Metrolink ...........................................................................23 MetrolinkGateways..............................................................................................24 Expand Mobility Choices for Seniors and Persons with Disabilities............24 Community Based Transit/Circulators ...............................................................25 SafeTransit Stops .................................................................................................25 Environmental Cleanup Overview ................................................................................................................26 ProjectDescription ...............................................................................................27 Taxpayer Safeguards and Audits Overview ................................................................................................................28 Description..............................................................................................................29 Measure M Investment Summary........................................................31 61 2 ED �. Introduction AF PV Measure M Promises Fulfilled improve Orange County's freeway system; On November 6, 1990, Orange County voters commitment to maintaining and improving the approved Measure M, a half-cent local transportation network of streets and roads in every community; sales tax for twenty years.All of the major projects an expansion of Metrolink rail service through the promised to and approved by the voters are core of Orange County with future extensions to underway or complete. Funds that go to cities and connect with nearby communities and regional the County of Orange to maintain and improve rail systems;more transit service for seniors and local street and roads, along with transit fare disabled persons;and funds to clean up runoff reductions for seniors and persons with disabilities, from roads that leads to beach closures. will continue until Measure M ends in 2011.The promises made in Measure M have been fulfilled. Strong Safeguards These commitments are underscored by a set of Continued Investment Needed strong taxpayer safeguards to ensure that promises Orange County continues to grow. By the year 2030, made in the Plan are kept. They include an annual Orange County's population will increase by 24 independent audit and report to the taxpayers; percent from 2.9 million in 2000 to 3.6 million in ongoing monitoring and review of spending by 2030;jobs will increase by 27 percent; and travel an independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee; on our roads and highways by 39 percent.Without requirement for full public review and update of continued investment average morning rush hour the Plan every ten years;voter approval for any speeds on Orange County freeways will fall by major changes to the Plan; strong penalties for 31 percent and on major streets by 32 percent. any misuse of funds and a strict limit of no more than one percent for administrative expenses. Responding to this continued growth and broad support for investment in Orange County's No Increase in Taxes transportation system, the Orange County The traffic improvements detailed in this plan do Transportation Authority considered the not require an increase in taxes. Renewal of the transportation projects and programs that would be existing Measure M one-half cent transportation possible if Measure M were renewed. The Authority, sales tax will enable all of the projects and together with the 34 cities of Orange County,the programs to be implemented.And by using good Orange County Board of Supervisors and thousands planning and sensible financing,projects that of Orange County citizens,participated during the are ready to go could begin as early as 2007. last eighteen months in developing a Transportation Investment Plan for consideration by the voters. Renewing Measure M The projects and programs that follow constitute A Plan for New Transportation Investments the Transportation Investment Plan for the The Plan that follows is a result of those efforts. It renewal of the Measure M transportation sales tax reflects the varied interests and priorities inherent approved by Orange County voters in November in the diverse communities of Orange County. It of 1990. These improvements are necessary to includes continued investment to expand and address current and future transportation needs in Orange County and reflect the best efforts to achieve consensus among varied interests Aa and communities throughout the County. 61 62 3 Overview The Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment Freeways Plan is a 30-year, $11.8 billion program designed to Relieving congestion on the Riverside/Artesia reduce traffic congestion,strengthen our economy Freeway(SR-91)is the centerpiece of the freeway and improve our quality of life by upgrading program,and will include new lanes,new key freeways, fixing major freeway interchanges, interchanges,and new bridges. Other major projects maintaining streets and roads,synchronizing traffic will make substantial improvements on Interstate signals countywide,building a visionary rail transit 5 (1-5)in southern Orange County and the San system,and protecting our environment from the oily Diego Freeway(1-405)in western Orange County. street runoff that pollutes Orange County beaches. The notorious Orange Crush—the intersection of The Transportation Investment Plan is focused solely the 1-5, the Garden Grove Freeway(SR-22)and the on improving the transportation system and includes Orange Freeway(SR-57)near Angel Stadium—will tough taxpayer safeguards,including a Taxpayer be improved and upgraded.Under the Plan,major Oversight Committee, required annual audits, traffic chokepoints on almost every Orange County and regular, public reports on project progress. freeway will be remedied. Improving Orange County freeways will be the greatest investment The Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment in the Renewed Measure M program: Forty- Plan must be reviewed annually,in public session, three percent of net revenues, or$4.871 billion, and every ten years a detailed review of the Plan will be invested in new freeway construction. must take place. If changing circumstances require the voter-approved plan to be changed,those Streets and Roads changes must be taken to the voters for approval. More than 6,500 lane miles of aging streets and roads will need repair,rejuvenation and improvement. City streets and county roads need to be maintained regularly and potholes have to be filled quickly. Thirty-two percent of net revenue from the Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment Plan, or $3.625 billion,will be devoted to fixing potholes, improving intersections, synchronizing traffic signals countywide, and making the existing countywide network of streets and roads safer and more efficient. 62 63 4 icD � Public Transit program,or $118.6 million over 30 years,will As Orange County continues to grow,building a pay for annual, independent audits,taxpayer visionary rail transportation system that is safe, safeguards,an independent Taxpayer Oversight clean and convenient,uses and preserves existing Committee assigned to watchdog government rights-of-way,and, over time, provides high-speed spending,and a full, public disclosure of all Renewed connections both inside and outside of Orange Measure M expenditures.A detailed review of the County,is a long term goal. Twenty-five percent program must be conducted every ten years and, of the net revenue from Renewed Measure M,or if needed,major changes in the investment plan $2.83 billion,will be dedicated to transit programs must be brought before Orange County voters for countywide.About twenty percent, or$2.24 billion, approval. Taxpayers will receive an annual report will be dedicated to creating a new countywide detailing the Renewed Measure M expenditures. high capacity transit system anchored on the Additionally,as required by law, an estimated one existing, successful Metrolink and Amtrak rail line, and a half percent of the sales taxes generated, or and about five percent, or$591 million,will be $178 million over 30 years,must be paid to the used to enhance senior transportation programs California State Board of Equalization for collecting and provide targeted,safe localized bus service. the one-half cent sales tax that funds the Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment Plan. Environmental Cleanup Every day,more than 70 million gallons of oily In this pamphlet, every specific project, program, pollution,litter,and dirty contaminants wash off and safeguard included in the Renewed Measure streets,roads,and freeways and pour onto Orange M Transportation Investment Plan is explained. County waterways and beaches. When it rains, the Similar details will be provided to every Orange transportation-generated beach and ocean pollution County voter if the measure is placed on the ballot. increases tenfold. Under the plan, two percent of the gross Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment Plan, or$237 million,will be dedicated to protecting Orange County beaches from this transportation-generated pollution(sometimes called "urban runoff")while improving ocean water quality. Taxpayer Safeguards and Audits When new transportation dollars are approved, they should go for transportation and transportation purposes alone. No bait-and-switch. No using transportation dollars for other purposes. The original Measure M went solely for transportation purposes. The Renewed Measure M must be just as airtight. One percent of the gross Measure M Ao� 63 64 5 Freeway Projects Overview Every day, traffic backs up somewhere on the near Angel Stadium—is in need of a major face lift. Orange County freeway system.And, every day, And the intersection of Interstate 5 and the Costa freeway traffic seems to get a little worse. Mesa Freeway(SR-55)is also slated for major repair. In the past decade, Orange County has made major Pays Big Dividends strides in re-building our aging freeway system. Local investment in freeways also pays big dividends But there is still an enormous amount of work in the search for other needed freeway dollars. that needs to be done to make the freeway system Because of state and federal matching rules, Orange work well.You see the need for improvement every County's local investment in freeway projects acts time you drive on an Orange County freeway as a magnet for state and federal transportation dollars—pulling more freeway construction Forty-three percent of net revenues from the dollars into the county and allowing more traffic- Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment Plan reducing freeway projects to be built sooner. is dedicated to improving Orange County freeways, the largest portion of the 30-year transportation plan. Innovative Environmental Mitigation A minimum of$243.5 million will be available, SR-91 is the Centerpiece subject to a Master Agreement, to provide for Making the troubled Riverside/Artesia Freeway comprehensive,rather than piecemeal,mitigation of (SR-91)work again is the centerpiece of the the environmental impacts of freeway improvements. Renewed Measure M Freeway program. The fix Using a proactive,innovative approach,the on the SR-91 will require new lanes,new bridges, Master Agreement negotiated between the Orange new overpasses,and, in the Santa Ana Canyon County Local Transportation Authority and portion of the freeway,a diversion of drivers to the state and federal resource agencies will provide Foothill Corridor(SR-241) so the rest of the Orange higher-value environmental benefits such as County freeway system can work more effectively. habitat protection,wildlife corridors and resource preservation in exchange for streamlined project And there's more to the freeway program than the approvals for the freeway program as a whole. fix of SR-91—much more. More than$1 billion is earmarked for Interstate 5 in South County. Freeway projects will also be planned, designed More than $800 million is slated to upgrade the and constructed with consideration for their San Diego Freeway(1-405)between Irvine and aesthetic,historic and environmental impacts the Los Angeles County line.Another significant on nearby properties and communities using I investment is planned on the congested Costa such elements as parkway style designs,locally Mesa Freeway(SR-55).And needed projects native landscaping,sound reduction and aesthetic designed to relieve traffic chokepoints are planned treatments that complement the surroundings. for almost every Orange County freeway. To make any freeway system work,bottlenecks at interchanges also have to be fixed. The notorious Orange Crush Interchange—where the Santa Ana Freeway(I-5)meets the Orange Freeway(SR-57)and the Garden Grove Freeway(SR-22)in a traffic tangle Alty- 64 Orange County Freeway Projects G' 57 7 H i M Q E A F g K L C D A B Santa Ana Freeway(1-5) page 7 H I Riverside Freeway(SR-91) page 11 C Santa Ana Freeway/San Diego Freeway(1-5) page 8 I Riverside Freeway(SR-91) page 12 nD Santa Ana Freeway/San Diego Freeway(1-5) page 8 K L San Diego Freeway(1-405) page 13-14 E Garden Grove Freeway(SR-22) page 9 M Freeway Access Improvements(1-605) page 15 F Costa Mesa Freeway(SR-55) page 9 (not mapped) G Orange Freeway(SR-57) page 10 Freeway Service Patrol(not mapped) page 15 66 , i.. OFF- Freeway Projects Santa Ana Freeway Interchange Improvements t i i Project O Project O Santa Ana Freeway(1-5) Improvements Santa Ana Freeway(1-5) Improvements from the between Costa Mesa Freeway(SR-55) Costa Mesa Freeway(SR-55)to El Toro "Y" Area and "Orange Crush" Area (SR-57) Description: Description: Build new lanes and improve the interchanges Reduce freeway congestion through improvements in the area between SR-55 and the SR-133 (near at the SR-55/I-5 interchange area between the Fourth the El Toro'Y ). This segment of I-5 is the major Street and Newport Boulevard ramps on 1-5,and route serving activity areas in the cities of Irvine, between Fourth Street and Edinger Avenue on Tustin, Santa Ana and north Orange County. The SR-55.Also,add capacity on 1-5 between SR-55 and project will also make improvements at local SR-57 to relieve congestion at the"Orange Crush". interchanges,such as Jamboree Road. The project The project will generally be constructed within the will generally be constructed within the existing existing right-of-way. Specific improvements will be right-of-way. Specific improvements will be subject subject to approved plans developed in cooperation to approved plans developed in cooperation with with local jurisdictions and affected communities. local jurisdictions and affected communities. The project will increase freeway capacity and reduce The project will increase freeway capacity and congestion. The current daily traffic volume on this reduce congestion. The current traffic volume segment of the I-5 between SR-55 and SR-57 is about on this segment of 1-5 is about 356,000 vehicles 389,000. The demand is expected to grow by more per day and is expected to increase by nearly 24 than 19 percent by 2030,bringing the daily usage to percent,bringing it up to 440,000 vehicles per 464,000 vehicles per day. Regional plans also include day. In addition to the projects described above, additional improvements on 1-5 from the"Orange regional plans include additional improvements Crush" to SR-91 using federal and state funds. to this freeway at local interchanges,such as Culver Drive,using federal and state funds. Cost: The estimated cost to improve this Cost: section of the 1-5 is $470.0 million. The estimated cost to improve this section of I-5 is$300.2 million. Orange Santa 5 Ana North Tustin 66 67 $ Freeway Projects Santa Ana Freeway/San Diego Freeway (1-5) Project Project 0 San Diego Freeway (1-5) Improvements Santa Ana Freeway/ San Diego Freeway (1-5) South of the El Toro "Y" Local Interchange Upgrades Description: Description: Add new lanes to I-5 from the vicinity of the El Toro Update and improve key I-5 interchanges such Interchange in Lake Forest to the vicinity of SR-73 as Avenida Pico, Ortega Highway,Avery Parkway, in Mission Viejo.Also add new lanes on I-5 between La Paz Road, El Toro Road,and others to relieve Coast Highway and Avenida Pico interchanges to street congestion around older interchanges and reduce freeway congestion in San Clemente. The on ramps. Specific improvements will be subject project will also make major improvements at local to approved plans developed in cooperation with interchanges as listed in Project D. The project local jurisdictions and affected communities. will generally be constructed within the existing right-of-way. Specific improvements will be subject In addition to the project described above, to approved plans developed in cooperation with regional plans also include improvements to local jurisdictions and affected communities. the local interchanges at Camino Capistrano, Oso Parkway,Alicia Parkway and Barranca The project will increase freeway capacity and Parkway using federal and state funds. reduce congestion. Current traffic volume on I-5 near the El Toro "Y"is about 342,000 vehicles per Cost: day. This volume will increase in the future by 35 The estimated cost for the I-5 local percent,bringing it up to 460,000 vehicles per interchange upgrades is $258.0 million. day. Regional plans also include construction of a new freeway access point between Crown Valley Parkway and Avery Parkway as well as new off ramps at Stonehill Drive using federal and state funds. 73 Mission Cost: 1�404 Viejo The estimated cost to improve these segments of I-5 is$627.0 million. Laguna Niguel uan . . Dana Point San Clemente FL Dana Foist i 67 68 9 77 aFreeway Projects Garden G • Freeway Costa Mesa Freeway (SR-55) Project 0 Project 0 Garden Grove Freeway(SR-22) Costa Mesa Freeway(SR-55) Improvements Access Improvements Description: Description: Add new lanes to SR-55 between Garden Grove Construct interchange improvements at Euclid Freeway(SR-22) and the San Diego Freeway Street,Brookhurst Street and Harbor Boulevard (I-405), generally within existing right-of-way, to reduce freeway and street congestion near these including merging lanes between interchanges to interchanges. Specific improvements will be subject smooth traffic flow. This project also provides for to approved plans developed in cooperation with freeway operational improvements for the portion local jurisdictions and affected communities. of SR-55 between SR-91 and SR-22. The project will generally be constructed within the existing Regional plans also include the construction of right-of-way. Specific improvements will be subject new freeway-to-freeway carpool ramps to the to approved plans developed in cooperation with SR-22/I-405 interchange,and improvements to local jurisdictions and affected communities. the local interchange at Magnolia Avenue using federal and state funds. The project will increase freeway capacity and reduce congestion. This freeway carries about 295,000 Cost: vehicles on a daily basis. This volume is expected The estimated cost to improve the to increase by nearly 13 percent,bringing it up to SR-22 interchanges is $120.0 million. 332,000 vehicles per day in the future. In addition to the projects described above,regional plans also include a new street overcrossing and carpool ramps at Alton Avenue using federal and state funds. Cost: The estimated cost for these SR-55 improvements is $366.0 million. • • • - Grove A0 1 68 69 10 � rFreeway Projects 49 s "S' Orange Freeway (SR-57) r ! . z•M Project Orange Freeway (SR-57) Improvements Description: Build a new northbound lane between Orangewood Avenue and Lambert Road. Other projects include improvements to the Lambert interchange and the addition of a northbound truck climbing lane between Lambert and Tonner Canyon Brea Road. The improvements will be designed and coordinated specifically to reduce congestion at SR-57/SR-91 interchange. These improvements will be made generally within existing right-of- way. Specific improvements will be subject to approved plans developed in cooperation with 11-5711 local jurisdictions and affected communities. The project will increase freeway capacity and reduce Placentia congestion. The daily traffic volume on this freeway is about 315,000 vehicles. By 2030, this volume will Fullerton increase by 15 percent,bringing it up to 363,000 vehicles per day in addition to the project described above,regional plans include new carpool ramps at Cerritos Avenue using federal and state funds. Cost: The estimated cost to implement SR-57 improvements is$258.7 million. Anaheim 57) 69 70 •'" FreewayProjects Riverside Freeway (SR-91) .. Project 0 Project Riverside Freeway (SR-91) Improvements Riverside Freeway (SR-91) Improvements from the Santa Ana Freeway (1-5) to from Orange Freeway (SR-57) to the Costa the Orange Freeway (SR-57) Mesa Freeway (SR-55) Interchange Area Description: Description: Add capacity in the westbound direction and provide Improve the SR-91/SR-55 to SR-91/SR-57 operational improvements at on and off ramps to interchange complex,including nearby local the SR-91 between I-5 and the Orange Freeway interchanges such as Tustin Avenue and Lakeview, (SR-57), generally within existing right-of-way,to as well as adding freeway capacity between smooth traffic flow and relieve the SR-57/SR-91 SR-55 and SR-57. The project will generally interchange. Specific improvements will be subject be constructed within the existing right-of- to approved plans developed in cooperation with way. Specific improvements will be subject to local jurisdictions and affected communities. approved plans developed in cooperation with local jurisdictions and affected communities. The current daily freeway volume along this segment of SR-91 is about 256,000. By 2030, Current freeway volume on this segment this volume is expected to increase by nearly 13 of the SR-91 is about 245,000 vehicles per percent,bringing it up to 289,900 vehicles per day. day. This vehicular demand is expected to increase by 22 percent,bringing it up to Cost: 300,000 vehicles per day in the future. The estimated cost for improvements in this segment of SR-91 is $140.0 million. Cost: The estimated cost for these improvements to the SR-91 is$416.5 million. Placentia Fullerton (57 91 Anaheim ` Anaheim Villa I ark �t D7 70 71 12 Freeway Projects Riverside - - • • y f� Project0 This project also includes improvements to the segment of SR-91 between SR-241 and SR-55. Riverside Freeway (SR-91) Improvements The concept is to generally add one new lane in from Costa Mesa Freeway (SR-55) to each direction and improve the interchanges. the Orange/ Riverside County Line Today,this freeway carries about 314,000 vehicles Description: every day. This volume is expected to increase by 36 This project adds capacity on SR-91 beginning at percent,bringing it up to 426,000 vehicles by 2030. SR-55 and extending to I-15 in Riverside County. Cost: The first priority will be to improve the segment The estimated cost for these improvements of SR-91 east of SR-241. The goal is to provide to the SR-91 is $352.0 million. up to four new lanes of capacity between SR-241 and Riverside County Line by making best use of available freeway property,adding reversible lanes,building elevated sections and improving connections to SR-241. These projects would be constructed in conjunction with similar coordinated improvements in Riverside County extending to I-15 and provide a continuous set of improvements between SR-241 and I-15. The portion of improvements in Riverside County will be paid for from other sources. Specific improvements will be subject to approved plans developed in cooperation with local jurisdictions and affected communities. VillaPlacentia Yorba Linda 91 Anaheim Park Project cost estimate amendedpn November 9,2012. 72 13 Freeway - cts San Diego Freeway (1-405) Project (as adopted by the Orange County Transportation Authority Board of Directors on October 14, San Diego Freeway (1-405) Improvements 2005)and will be developed in cooperation with between the 1-605 Freeway in Los Alamitos local jurisdictions and affected communities. area and Costa Mesa Freeway (SR-55) Today, I-405 carries about 430,000 vehicles daily. Description: The volume is expected to increase by nearly 23 Add new lanes to the San Diego Freeway between percent,bringing it up to 528,000 vehicles daily I-605 and SR-55,generally within the existing right- by 2030. The project will increase freeway capacity of-way. The project will make best use of available and reduce congestion. Near-term regional plans freeway property,update interchanges and widen also include the improvements to the 1-405/SR-73 all local overcrossings according to city and regional interchange as well as a new carpool interchange master plans. The improvements will be coordinated at Bear Street using federal and state funds. with other planned I-405 improvements in the I-405/SR-22/I-605 interchange area to the north Cost: and I-405/SR-73 improvements to the south. The The estimated cost for these improvements improvements will adhere to recommendations of to the 1-405 is$1,072.8 million. the Interstate 405 Major Investment Study Los Alamitos Garden • .0 • Beach Santa405 A • HuntingtonW Westminster ostminster Me • Oro • • At • • Mesa lley 1 40511) ---� Project cost estimate amended 1w November 9, 2012. 73 14 Freeway Projects ✓ a ♦ San Diego Freeway4 A Project0 subject to approved plans developed in cooperation with local jurisdictions and affected communities. San Diego Freeway (1-405) Improvements between Costa Mesa Freeway This segment of the freeway carries 354,000 (SR-55) and Santa Ana Freeway (1-5) vehicles a day. This number will increase by nearly 13 percent,bringing it up to 401,000 Description: vehicles per day by 2030. The project will increase Add new lanes to the freeway from SR-55 to the freeway capacity and reduce congestion. In I-5. The project will also improve chokepoints addition to the projects described above,regional at interchanges and add merging lanes near on/ plans include a new carpool interchange at Von off ramps such as Lake Forest Drive, Irvine Center Kannan Avenue using federal and state funds. Drive and SR-133 to improve the overall freeway operations in the I-405/I-5 El Toro "Y'area. The Cost: projects will generally be constructed within the The estimated cost for these improvements existing right-of-way. Specific improvements will be to the I-405 is $319.7 million. / 405 D73 al Lake Irvine Laguna r ds Laguna Hills Aa� 73 74 5 a Freeways Projects 1-605 Freeway Access Improvements ri FreewayPatrol Project a Q Project 1-605 Freeway Access Improvements Freeway Service Patrol Description: Description: Improve freeway access and arterial connection The Freeway Service Patrol(FSP)provides to I-605 serving the communities of Los Alamitos competitively bid,privately contracted tow and Cypress. The project will be coordinated with truck service for motorists with disabled vehicles other planned improvements along SR-22 and on the freeway system. This service helps I-405. Specific improvements will be subject to stranded motorists and quickly clears disabled approved plans developed in cooperation with vehicles out of the freeway lanes to minimize local jurisdictions and affected communities. congestion caused by vehicles blocking traffic and passing motorists rubbernecking. Regional plans also include the addition of new freeway-to-freeway carpool ramps to the I-405/ Currently Freeway Service Patrol is available on I-605 interchange using federal and state funds. Orange County freeways Monday through Friday This improvement will connect to interchange during peak commuting hours. This project improvements at I-405 and SR-22 as well as would assure that this basic level of service new freeway lanes between I-405 and I-605. could be continued through 2041. As demand and congestion levels increase,this project Cost: would also permit service hours to be extended The estimated cost to make these I-605 interchange throughout the day and into the weekend. improvements is $20.0 million. Cost: The estimated cost to support the Freeway Service Patrol Program for thirty years beyond 2011 is $150.0 million. 74 75 16 ED I Streets • • Roads Projects Overview Orange County has more than 6,500 lane miles Renewed Measure M provides financial incentives of aging streets and roads,many of which are in for traffic improvements that cross city and need of repair,rejuvenation and improvement. county lines,providing a seamless,county- Intersections need to be widened,traffic lights wide transportation system that's friendly to need to be synchronized,and potholes need to regional commuters and fair to local residents. be filled.And, in many cases,to make Orange County's transportation system work smoothly,we Better Cooperation need to add additional lanes to existing streets. To place a higher priority on cooperative, collaborative regional decision-making,Renewed Thirty-two percent of net revenues from the Measure M creates incentives that encourage traffic Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment lights to be coordinated across jurisdictional lines, Plan is dedicated to maintaining streets, major street improvements to be better coordinated fixing potholes,improving intersections and on a regional basis,and street repair programs to be widening city streets and county roads. a high priority countywide. To receive Measure M funding,cities and the county have to cooperate. Making the System Work Making the existing system of streets and roads The Streets and Roads program in Renewed work better—by identifying spot intersection Measure M involves shared responsibilities—local improvements, filling potholes,repaving worn- cities and the county set their local priorities out streets—is the basis of making a countywide within a competitive,regional framework that transportation system work. That basis has to be the rewards cooperation,honors best practices,and first priority. But to operate a successful,countywide encourages government agencies to work together. system of streets and roads,we need more: street widenings and traffic signals synchronized countywide.And there's more. Pedestrian safety near local schools needs to be improved. Traffic flow must be smoothed. Street repairs must be made sooner.And,perhaps most importantly,cities and the county must work together—collaboratively—to find simple,low-cost traffic solutions. 75 Orange County Streets and Roads Projects rea e La labra Fullerto n0a la nti \ u __Lypres Par ` Viiia Park G rde Cr range. Los iamitos Seai st inst r Tustin Beach anta Ana F w Huntington 4 Beach Ranch Fountain Santa V lt n argarita Lake Costa Forest Mesa ^ . issio Vicj ch L ods L un- I Aliso Viejo aguna Lag each N'g San an f Capi trano- {JO Regional Capacity Program page 18 O Local Fair Share Program page 20 (not mapped) (not mapped) Nearly 1,000 miles of new lanes Street maintenance and improvements ORegional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program page 19 (see grid above) Over 750 miles of roadway Over 2,000 coordinated signals 77 av18 .•.k'.±F4 ri=94,�".' Streets and Roads Projects �t Regional C• • i •g • t rev. Project Roughly 1,000 miles of new street lanes remain to be completed,mostly in the form of widening Regional Capacity Program existing streets to their ultimate planned width. Completion of the system will result in a more Description: even traffic flow and efficient system. This program,in combination with local matching funds, provides a funding source to complete the Another element of this program is funding for Orange County Master Plan of Arterial Highways construction of railroad over or underpass grade (MPAH). The program also provides for intersection separations where high volume streets are impacted improvements and other projects to help improve by freight trains along the Burlington Northern street operations and reduce congestion. The Santa Fe railroad in northern Orange County. program allocates funds through a competitive process and targets projects that help traffic the most Cost: by considering factors such as degree of congestion The estimated cost for these street relief,cost effectiveness,project readiness, etc. improvement projects is $1,132.8 million. Local jurisdictions must provide a dollar-for-dollar match to qualify for funding,but can be rewarded with lower match requirements if they give priority to other key objectives,such as better road maintenance and regional signal synchronization. i 77 78 19 Streets • • Roads Projects T .!� Regional Traffic • • Synchronization Program u� e x .. Project To ensure that this program is successful,cities,the County of Orange and Caltrans will be required Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program to work together and prepare a common traffic signal synchronization plan and the necessary Description: governance and legal arrangements before receiving This program targets over 2,000 signalized funds. In addition,cities will be required to intersections across the County for coordinated provide 20 percent of the costs. Once in place, operation. The goal is to improve the flow the program will provide funding for ongoing of traffic by developing and implementing maintenance and operation of the synchronization regional signal coordination programs plan. Local jurisdictions will be required to that cross jurisdictional boundaries. publicly report on the performance of their signal synchronization efforts at least every three years. Most traffic signal synchronization programs today Signal equipment to give emergency vehicles are limited to segments of roads or individual cities priority at intersections will be an eligible expense and agencies. For example,signals at intersections for projects implemented as part of this program. of freeways with arterial streets are controlled by Caltrans,while nearby signals at local street Cost: intersections are under the control of cities. This The estimated cost of developing and maintaining results in the street system operating at less than a regional traffic signal synchronization program maximum efficiency.When completed, this project for Orange County is $453.1 million. can increase the capacity of the street grid and reduce the delay by over six million hours annually. I 78 79 20 Streets . Local Fair Share Program Project 5. Annually submit a six-year Capital Improvement Program and commit to spend Measure Local Fair Share Program M funds within three years of receipt. 6. Agree to assess traffic impacts of new Description: development and require that new This element of the program will provide flexible development pay a fair share of any funding to help cities and the County of Orange keep necessary transportation improvements. up with the rising cost of repairing the aging street 7. Agree to plan,build and operate major system. In addition,cities can use these funds for streets consistent with the countywide other local transportation needs such as residential Master Plan of Arterial Highways to ensure street projects,traffic and pedestrian safety near efficient traffic flow across city boundaries. schools,signal priority for emergency vehicles, etc. 8. Participate in Traffic Forums with neighboring jurisdictions to facilitate the implementation and This program is intended to augment,rather than maintenance of traffic signal synchronization replace,existing transportation expenditures programs and projects. This requires cities to and therefore cities must meet the following balance local traffic policies with neighboring requirements to receive the funds. cities—for selected streets—to promote more efficient traffic circulation overall. 1. Continue to invest General Fund monies 9. Agree to consider land use planning (or other local discretionary monies) for strategies that are transit-friendly, transportation and annually increase this support alternative transportation modes commitment to keep pace with inflation. including bike and pedestrian access and 2. Agree to use Measure M funds for reduce reliance on the automobile. transportation purposes only,subject to full repayment and a loss of funding The funds under this program are distributed to eligibility for five years for any misuse. cities and the County of Orange by formula once 3. Agree to separate accounting for Measure the cities have fulfilled the above requirements. The M funds and annual reporting on formula will account for population,street mileage actual Measure M expenditures. and amount of sales tax collected in each jurisdiction. 4. Develop and maintain a Pavement Management Program to ensure timely Cost: street maintenance and submit regular The estimated cost for this program for public reports on the condition of streets. thirty years is $2,039.1 million. 79 80 21 Transit Overview ED I a vC Building streets, roads and freeways helps fix The new,localized transit programs will bring today's traffic problems. Building a visionary transit competition to local transportation planning, system that is safe, clean and convenient focuses creating a marketplace of transportation ideas where on Orange County's transportation future. the best ideas emerge and compete for funding. The plan is to encourage civic entrepreneurship and Twenty-five percent of net revenues from the stimulate private involvement and investment. Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment Plan is allocated towards building and improving Transit Investment Criteria rail and bus transportation in Orange County. The guiding principles for all transit investments Approximately twenty percent of the Renewed are value,safety,convenience and reliability. Each Measure M funds is allocated to developing a creative local transit vision will be evaluated against clear countywide transit program and five percent of criteria,such as congestion relief,cost-effectiveness, the revenues will be used to enhance programs for readiness,connectivity,and a sound operating plan. senior citizens and for targeted,localized bus service. All transit expenditures must be consistent with In terms of bus services,more specialized transit the safeguards and audit provisions of the Plan. services,including improved van services and reduced fares for senior citizens and people with A New Transit Vision disabilities,will be provided. Safety at key bus stops The key element of the Renewed Measure M transit will be improved.And a network of community- program is improving the 100-year old Santa Fe based,mini-bus services will be developed in rail line,known today as the Los Angeles/San areas outside of the central county rail corridor. Diego(LOSSAN)rail corridor,through the heart of the county. Then,by using this well-established, operational commuter rail system as a platform for future growth,existing rail stations will be developed into regional transportation hubs that can serve as regional transportation gateways or the centerpiece of local transportation services.A series of new,well- coordinated, flexible transportation systems, each one customized to the unique transportation vision the station serves,will be developed. Creativity and good financial sense will be encouraged. Partnerships will be promoted. Transportation solutions for each transportation hub can range from monorails to local mini-bus systems to new technologies. Fresh thinking will be rewarded. Aa- 80 Orange County Transit Projects Buena Park Station Fullerton Station Antabeim ttanyeta :. .Anaheim Staff � Station Soma Arta Depot TeratinoBai Mrkte Transppriallon lagtena iYkgnel Ntissian triep Station'. San loan Capistrano Stotion � Y{ Son aemente Station R High Frequency Metrolink Service(nionit =existing rail line/stations) page 23 Transit Extensions to Metrolink 0 page 23 Metrolink Gateways(not mapped) page 24 nu Expand Mobility Choices for Seniors and Persons with Disabilities(countywide; not mapped) page 24 Community Based Transit/Circulators(countywide;not mapped) page 25 Safe Transit Stops(countywide;not mapped) page 25 82 23 Transit ® Projects High FrequencyMetrolink Transit - • to Metrolink Project0 Project 0 High Frequency Metrolink Service Transit Extensions to Metrolink Description: Description: This project will increase rail services within the Frequent service in the Metrolink corridor provides county and provide frequent Metrolink service north a high capacity transit system linking communities of Fullerton to Los Angeles. The project will provide within the central core of Orange County. This for track improvements,more trains,and other project will establish a competitive program for local related needs to accommodate the expanded service. jurisdictions to broaden the reach of the rail system to other activity centers and communities. Proposals This project is designed to build on the successes for extensions must be developed and supported of Metrolink and complement service expansion by local jurisdictions and will be evaluated against made possible by the current Measure M. The well-defined and well-known criteria as follows: service will include upgraded stations and added parking capacity;safety improvements • Traffic congestion relief and quiet zones along the tracks;and frequent • Project readiness,with priority given shuttle service and other means,to move to projects that can be implemented arriving passengers to nearby destinations. within the first five years of the Plan • Local funding commitments and The project also includes funding for the availability of right-of-way improving grade crossings and constructing • Proven ability to attract other financial over or underpasses at high volume arterial partners,both public and private streets that cross the Metrolink tracks. 0 Cost-effectiveness • Proximity to jobs and population centers Cost: • Regional as well as local benefits The estimated cost of capital and • Ease and simplicity of connections operations is$1,129.8 million. • Compatible, approved land uses • Safe and modern technology • A sound, long-term operating plan This project shall not be used to fund transit routes that are not directly connected to or that would be redundant to the core rail service on the Metrolink corridor. The emphasis shall be on expanding access to the core rail system and on establishing connections to communities and major activity centers that are not immediately adjacent to the Metrolink corridor. It is intended that multiple transit projects be funded through 4a_ Project R cost estimate amended®a December 14,2015. 8s 24 MTransit Projects Metrolink Gateways .... Expand Mobility Choices . . rs and PersonsDisabilities a competitive process and no single project may Project O be awarded all of the funds under this program. Expand Mobility Choices for Seniors These connections may include a variety of and Persons with Disabilities transit technologies such as conventional bus, bus rapid transit or high capacity rail transit Description: systems as long as they can be fully integrated This project will provide services and programs and provide seamless transition for the users. to meet the growing transportation needs of seniors and persons with disabilities as follows: Cost: The estimated cost to implement this program One and forty-seven hundredths percent over thirty years is $1,000.0 million. (1.47%) of net revenues will stabilize fares and provide fare discounts for bus services, specialized ACCESS Project O services and future rail services • One percent of net revenues will be Convert Metrolink Station(s) to Regional available to continue and expand local Gateways that Connect Orange County community van service for seniors through with High-Speed Rail Systems the existing Senior Mobility Program • One percent will supplement existing Description: countywide senior non-emergency This program will provide the local improvements medical transportation services that are necessary to connect planned future high-speed rail systems to stations Over the next 30 years, the population age 65 on the Orange County Metrolink route. and over is projected to increase by 93 percent. Demand for transit and specialized transportation The State of California is currently planning a services for seniors and persons with disabilities high-speed rail system linking northern and is expected to increase proportionately. southern California. One line is planned to terminate in Orange County. In addition, several Cost: magnetic levitation(MAGLEV)systems that The estimated cost to provide these programs would connect Orange County to Los Angeles over 30 years is$392.8 million. and San Bernardino Counties,including a link from Anaheim to Ontario airport, are also being planned or proposed by other agencies. Cost: The estimated Measure M share of the cost for these regional centers and connections is $57.9 million. Project T and U cost estimates amended es December 14, 2015. 84 25 Transit Community Based Transit/Circulators Safe Transit • • till Project0 Project i Community Based Transit/Circulators Safe Transit Stops Description: Description: This project will establish a competitive program This project provides for passenger amenities at for local jurisdictions to develop local bus transit 100 busiest transit stops across the County. The services such as community based circulators, stops will be designed to ease transfer between shuttles and bus trolleys that complement regional bus lines and provide passenger amenities bus and rail services, and meet needs in areas not such as improved shelters,lighting, current adequately served by regional transit. Projects will information on bus and train timetables and arrival need to meet performance criteria for ridership, times,and transit ticket vending machines. connection to bus and rail services,and financial viability to be considered for funding.All projects Cost: must be competitively bid, and they cannot The estimated cost of this project is $25.0 million. duplicate or compete with existing transit services. i Cost: The estimated cost of this project is $226.5 million. W 84 85 26 Environmental Cleanup Overview '4 Every day,more than 70 million gallons of oily The environmental cleanup program is designed to pollution, litter, and dirty contamination washes supplement,not supplant, existing transportation- off streets, roads and freeways and pours onto related water quality programs. This clean-up Orange County waterways and beaches.When program must improve, and not replace, existing it rains, the transportation-generated pollution pollution reduction efforts by cities,the county, increases tenfold,contributing to the increasing and special districts. Funds will be awarded number of beach closures and environmental to the highest priority programs that improve hazards along the Orange County coast. water quality,keep our beaches and streets clean, and reduce transportation-generated pollution Prior to allocation of funds for freeway, street and along Orange County's scenic coastline. transit projects, two percent of gross revenues from the Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment Plan is set aside to protect Orange County beaches from transportation-generated pollution(sometimes called "urban runoff') and improving ocean water quality. Countywide Competitive Program Measure M Environmental Cleanup funds will be used on a countywide,competitive basis to meet federal Clean Water Act standards for controlling transportation-generated pollution by funding nationally recognized Best Management Practices,such as catch basins with state-of- the-art biofiltration systems; or special roadside landscaping systems called bioswales that filter oil runoff from streets, roads and freeways. 85 86 27 Ilk X Environmental • • t Project The Environmental Cleanup program is subject to the following requirements: Environmental Cleanup • Development of a comprehensive countywide Description: capital improvement program for transportation Implement street and highway related water related water quality improvements quality improvement programs and projects that • A competitive grant process to award funds to will assist Orange County cities, the County the highest priority,most cost-effective projects of Orange and special districts to meet federal • A matching requirement to leverage Clean Water Act standards for urban runoff. other federal,state and local funds for water quality improvements The Environmental Cleanup monies may be used for • A maintenance of effort requirement to water quality improvements related to both existing ensure that funds augment,not replace and new transportation infrastructure,including existing water quality programs capital and operations improvements such as: • Annual reporting on actual expenditures and an assessment of the water quality benefits provided • Catch basin screens, filters and inserts • A strict limit on administrative costs • Roadside bioswales and biofiltration channels and a requirement to spend funds • Wetlands protection and restoration within three years of receipt • Continuous Deflective Separation(CDS)units • Penalties for misuse of any of the • Maintenance of catch basins and bioswales Environmental Cleanup funds • Other street-related"Best Management Practices" for capturing and treating urban runoff Cost: The estimated cost for the Environmental Cleanup This program is intended to augment,not replace program is $237.2 million. In addition it is existing transportation related water quality estimated that new freeway,road and transit projects expenditures and to emphasize high-impact funded by the Renewed Measure M Transportation capital improvements over local operations and Investment Plan will include more than $165 maintenance costs. In addition,all new freeway, million for mitigating water quality impacts. street and transit capital projects will include water quality mitigation as part of project scope and cost. Ab� 86 87 28 ED 1 Taxpayer . - . . . and Audits Overview When new transportation dollars are approved, Back to the Voters they should go for transportation and transportation Of course, over the next 30 years, things will change. alone. No bait-and-switch. No using transportation Minor adjustments can be made by a 2/3 vote of the dollars for other purposes. The original Taxpayer Oversight Committee and a 2/3 vote of Measure M went solely for transportation. The the Orange County Local Transportation Authority Renewed Measure M will be just as airtight. Board of Directors. Major changes must be taken back to voters for authorization.And, every ten And there will be no hidden costs in the program. years, and more frequently if necessary, the Orange County Local Transportation Authority must Prior to allocation of funds for freeway,street and conduct a thorough examination of the Renewed transit projects, one percent of gross revenues from Measure M Investment Plan and determine if the Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment major changes should be submitted to the voters. Plans is set aside for audits,safeguards, and taxpayer protection. By state law,one and one half percent of There are other important taxpayer safeguards, the gross sales taxes generated by Measure M must be all designed to insure the integrity of the voter- paid to the California State Board of Equalization for authorized plans. But each is focused on one collecting the countywide one-half percent sales tax goal: guaranteeing that new transportation that funds the Transportation Investment Program. dollars are devoted to solving Orange County's traffic problems and that no transportation Special Trust Fund dollars are diverted to anything else. To guarantee transportation dollars are used for transportation purposes,all funds must be kept in a special trust fund.An independent,outside audit of this fund will protect against cheaters who try to use the transportation funds for purposes other than specified transportation uses.A severe punishment will disqualify any agency that cheats from receiving Measure M funds for a five-year period. The annual audits,and annual reports detailing project progress,will be sent to Orange County taxpayers every year and will be reviewed in public session by a special Taxpayer Oversight Committee that can raise fiscal issues, ask tough questions,and must independently certify,on an annual basis, that transportation dollars have been spent strictly according to the Renewed Measure M Investment Plan. 87 S8 29 Taxpayer Taxpayer Safeguards and Audits Fund Accounting • All tax revenues and interest earned must be Description: deposited and maintained in a separate trust Implement and maintain strict taxpayer fund. Local jurisdictions that receive allocations safeguards to ensure that the Renewed Measure must also maintain them in a separate fund. M Transportation Investment Plan is delivered • All entities receiving tax funds must as promised. Restrict administrative costs to report annually on expenditures and one percent(1%) of total tax revenues and state progress in implementing projects collection of the tax as prescribed in state law • At any time,at its discretion,the Taxpayer [currently one-and-one-half(1.5%)percent]. Oversight Committee may conduct independent reviews or audits of the spending of tax funds Administration of the Transportation Investment • The elected Auditor/Controller of Orange Plan and all spending is subject to the following County must annually certify that spending specific safeguards and requirements: is in accordance with the Plan Oversight Spending Requirements • All spending is subject to an • Local jurisdictions receiving funds must annual independent audit abide by specific eligibility and spending • Spending decisions must be annually requirements detailed in the Streets&Roads and reviewed and certified by an independent Environmental Cleanup components of the Plan Taxpayer Oversight Committee • Funds must be used only for transportation • An annual report on spending and purposes described in the Plan. The penalty progress in implementing the Plan for misspending is full repayment and loss of must be submitted to taxpayers funding eligibility for a period of five years. • No funds may be used to replace Integrity of the Plan private developer funding committed • No changes to the Plan can be made to any project or improvement without review and approval by 2/3 vote • Funds shall augment,not replace existing funds of the Taxpayer Oversight Committee • Every effort shall be made to maximize matching • Major changes to the Plan such as deleting state and federal transportation dollars a project or shifting projects among major spending categories(Freeways, Streets& Roads,Transit,Environmental Cleanup) must be ratified by a majority of voters • The Plan must be subject at least every ten years to public review and assessment of progress in delivery,public support and changed circumstances.Any significant proposed changes to the Plan must be approved by the Taxpayer Oversight Committee and ratified by a majority of voters. 88 89 30 JILTaxpayer Taxpayer Oversight Committee • The committee shall consist of eleven members—two members from each of the five Board of Supervisor's districts,who shall not be elected or appointed officials—along with the elected Auditor/Controller of Orange County • Members shall be recruited and screened for expertise and experience by the Orange County Grand Jurors Association. Members shall be selected from the qualified pool by lottery. • The committee shall be provided with sufficient resources to conduct independent reviews and audits of spending and implementation of the Plan Collecting the Tax • The State Board of Equalization shall be paid one-and-one-half(1.5)percent of gross revenues each fiscal year for its services in collecting sales tax revenue as prescribed in Section 7273 of the State's Revenue and Taxation Code Cost: The estimated cost for Safeguards and Audits over thirty years is$296.6 million. �aEo JJI 89 90 31 MeaED I e M Investment cr C05TS LOCATION PR07ECTS 2005 estimates r in millions Freeway Projects I-5 Santa Ana Freeway Interchange Improvements Q $470.0 I-5 Santa Ana/San Diego Freeway Improvements OOG 1,185.2 SR-22 Garden Grove Freeway Access Improvements O 120.0 SR-55 Costa Mesa Freeway Improvements O 366.0 SR-57 Orange Freeway Improvements O 258.7 SR-91 Riverside Freeway Improvements 000 908.7* I-405 San Diego Freeway Improvements 00 1,392.5* I-605 Freeway Access Improvements © 20.0 All Freeway Service Patrol © 150.0 Streets & Roads Projects (in millions) $3,625.0 Regional Capacity Program Q $1,132.8 Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program 453.1 Local Fair Share Program Q 2,039.1 Transit Projects (in millions) $2,832.0 High Frequency Metrolink Service O $1,129.8* Transit Extensions to Metrolink O 1,000.0 Metrolink Gateways ® 57.9* Expand Mobility Choices for Seniors and Persons with Disabilities 0 392.8* Community Based Transit/Circulators O 226.5 Safe Transit Stops © 25.0 Environmental Cleanup (in millions) S237.2 Clean Up Highway and Street Runoff that Pollutes Beaches O $237.2 Taxpayer - . Collect Sales Taxes (State charges required by law) $178.0 Oversight and Annual Audits 118.6 Total00 *Asterisk notes project estimates that have becM amended since 2006.