Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Travel Protocol and Established Policies f F r City of Huntington Beach �.4 File #: 18-165 MEETING DATE: 7/16/2018 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY: Fred A. Wilson, City Manager PREPARED BY: Antonia Graham, Assistant to the City Manager Subject: City Council Travel Protocol and Established Policies Statement of Issue: At the June 5, 2018 City Council Meeting, Mayor Posey and Mayor Pro Tern Peterson introduced a Council Member Item to discuss Council Member travel and State and Federal advocacy trips. Following discussion, Council directed the City Manager to review the current travel policies as well as the budget and bring back to City Council any recommendations if needed. This Request for Council Action provides an overview of existing Council Member Travel policies/protocol. Financial Impact: There is no fiscal impact associated with the review of City Council travel protocol and the City's established policies related to such travel. Recommended Action: Provide staff direction on existing Council Travel Protocol and Established Policies. Alternative Action(s): Direct staff accordingly. Analysis: City Council Members often travel within the State and to Washington D.C. on official business to advocate for the City. These trips are often organized by third-party advocacy groups, such as the League of California Cities, Association of California Cities - Orange County, and Orange County Business Council. Currently, no official "City Council Travel" Policy exists that outlines the process used to determine which Council Member(s) will represent the City on advocacy trips to Washington D.C., or other travel. In addition, no formal policy exists regarding the allocation of the annual training and conferences budget for the City Council. City staff spoke with Council Member, Jill Hardy, who provided an overview of the past historical City of Huntington Beach Page 1 of 3 Printed on 7/11/2018 powere584,LegistarTl File #: 18-165 MEETING DATE: 7/16/2018 practice. For many years, seniority determined who would attend advocacy trips; generally, the Mayor would be the primary elected official designated to attend trips to Washington D.C. Only when the Mayor could not attend, would the Mayor Pro Tern attend. It is only in recent years that these new third-party advocacy groups began offering advocacy trips, thereby resulting in multiple trips to Sacramento and Washington D.C. available throughout the year. Council Travel Budget Although there is no formal policy that states how much of the annual travel budget each Council Member receives, the budget for Council related conferences and training was $21,100 in FY 2017/18. The general breakdown at the start of the fiscal year is as follows: $4,300 for the Mayor and $2,800 per Council Member. For FY 2018/2019 the budget was increased to $26,100. This has been the general budgetary practice. In the past, should a Council Member exceed his/her budget, he/she could ask another Council Member to use some of their unspent funds, depending upon availability. Best Practices Staff reviewed policies and procedures from various municipalities throughout the State. None of the policies reviewed dictate who can attend which conferences. However, Fountain Valley has a policy that states, "Every year sufficient funds are budgeted to allow every City Council Member the opportunity to attend the League of California Cities Annual Conference. Adequate funds are also budgeted to allow all Council Members to attend a national conference once every two years." The policy adopted by the City of Irvine states that criteria is used to determine whether a City Council and/or appointed official can travel. An official with the City of Irvine can travel on "official" City business when: (a) The conference or meeting is held by an organization or agency of which the City is a member; (b) The purpose of the travel is City representation in support of a City Council approved program, or at the direction of the City Council; and (c) Adequate funds are available within the approved individual City Council Business Expense budget or approved by the City Council separately. Some options the City Council may want to consider are the following: 1. Keep current practice in place 2. Memorialize current practice with a formal policy for advocacy travel to Washington D.C. only 3. Re-instate past historic practice with a formal policy for advocacy travel to Washington D.C. only 4. Appoint the Intergovernmental Relations Committee as the body tasked to determine attendance on advocacy trips to Washington D.C. City of Huntington Beach Page 2 of 3 Printed on 7/11/2018 powera5,8�,LegistarTM File #: 18-165 MEETING DATE: 7/16/2018 5. Create a new City Council Travel Policy incorporating best practices Environmental Status: Not applicable Strategic Plan Goal: Non-Applicable - Administrative Item Attachment(s): None City of Huntington Beach Page 3 of 3 Printed on 7/11/2018 pewere&$§t LegistarT" 1 City Council Travel Protocol and Established Policies JULY 16, 2018 CITY COUNCIL MEETING ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM 429 (18-165) Background ► At the June 5, 2018 City Council Meeting, Mayor Posey and Mayor Pro Tem Peterson introduced a Council Member Item to discuss Council Member travel and State and Federal Advocacy trips. P. The City Council directed the City Manager to review the current travel policies as well as the budget and bring back to City Council any recommendations, it needed. 1 Current Practices ► There is no "official" City Council Travel Policy that outlines the process used to determine which Council Member(s) will represent the City on advocacy trips to Washington D.C. and Sacramento, or other travel. ► City staff spoke with Council Member Jill Hardy, who provided an overview of the past historical practices. This practice utilized seniority to determine who would attend advocacy trips. Best Practices ► Staff reviewed policies and procedures from various municipalities throughout Orange County in addition to the League of California Cities who indicated that they do not have a model protocol. ► None of the policies reviewed dictated who can attend specific functions or conferences. ► Fountain Valley had a policy that stated, "Every year sufficient funds are budgeted to allow every Council Member the opportunity to attend the League of California Cities Annual Conference. Adequate funds are also budgeted to allow all Council Members to attend a national conference once every two years." ► Irvine has criteria that determines whether a City Council Member or appointed official can travel. Potential Options to Consider Keep the current practice in place Memorialize current practice with a formal policy for advocacy travel to Washington D.C. only Re-instate past historic practice with a formal policy for advocacy travel to Washington D.C. only Appoint the Intergovernmental Relations Committee as the body asked to determine attendance for advocacy trips to Washington D.C. Create a new City Council Travel Policy incorporating best practices. Questions?