Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Ascon Land Fill - Formerly Steverson Brothers Oil Rotary Mud
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION :HUNTINGTON SEACH To; Floyd G. Belsito From Steverson Project Tea City Administrator By: Raymond C. Picar Subject STEVERSON PROJECT TEAM Date August 13, 1979 REPORT The current status of the Steverson Mud Dump is as follows: - The permit required from the Orange County Solid Waste Enforcement Agency has been approved by the County and is now being forwarded to the State for final approval. A copy of the Solid Waste Facilities Permit is attached to this memorandum, and includes many conditional items for which the city needs to be aware. - Truck traffic continues to use the Hamilton entrance. This has reduced the dust problem on Magnolia. The fence on Hamilton has been completed. p The.bank stabilization project on Hamilton is completed and has significantly y improved the appearance of the north bank. The project team has been meeting from time to.time and will continue to pursue the . issues that have been previously identified to the Council by the team. RCP:cw cc: Picard Vogelsang Palin Hutton Public Works Director file attachments p WE D 1 4 1979 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ADMI11ISTRATI`1C OFFIrC L�.Ile March 6, 1979 Page Four RECOMMENDATION: 1. Planning Department should proceed with R.O.S. planning and zoning. 2. City Attorney' s office should be directed to prepare a new ordinance to clarify citizen uncertainty with regard to Huntington Beach Municipal Code sump definition application to Steverson Brother's mud dump. 3. Public Works engineers will be requested to comment on concrete slab fill . AYMOND . PICARD Fire Chief RCP : sh cc : G. Hutton J. Palin J. Vogelsang R. Grunbaum File Encls : ] 2/] 1/78 Report CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON LEACH To Floyd G: Belsito From Steverson Project Team City Administrator By: Raymond C. Picar Fire Chief Subject STEVERSON PROJECT TEAM Date December 11, 1978 As per your authorization in a Department head meeting, a Steverson Mud Dump Project Team consisting of Ray Picard, John Behrens, Jim Palin and Gail Hutton, has been established to provide City leadership and a catalyst to resolve the mud dump issues and bring about p final development of the site. The current issues are: I. Dust problem emanating from the site to adjacent areas. 2. Dust and/or dirt problem on adjacent street, caused by dump trucks moving in and out of the site. 3. There is surface oil, mud and water on the site that causes an odor in adjacent housing areas and may potentially trap birds and animals. 4. The dikes or bank which surrounds the site erodes onto adjacent_street areas during rainy weather. 5. The trucks which dump at the site are a general nuisance to residents in the area. 6. The producing oil operations on the site cause an odor problem. 7. The concrete being dumped on the site may hinder final development, as it will have to eventually be hauled away. 8. There is a question as to the legality of the non-conforming use. 9. The site is being used as a class 3 dump without City entitlement. 10. There is a question of an interpretation as to whether there is a legal violation of the Municipal Code Section pertaining to sumps. II. The site constitutes a visual blighted area. Without judging the issues as to their degree of accuracy or objectivity, the Committee is requesting authorization to proceed on a course of action to neutralize all of the issues and bring about a final site development solution. next page, please . . . . . . . lY Floyd G. Belsito, (2) December II, 1978 The project team has set a short range objective to neutralize the site issues as follows: I. To cover all waste and oil materials. 2. To control dust and debris problems. 3. To eliminate further dumping (after Item I is complete). 4. To eliminate bank slippage problems. S. To modify the code on sumps (clear definition). 6. To secure the site in a dormant state. If these neutralization objectives are satisfactory, the project team will develop and implement an objective program based on time, quality and quantity. The long term objectives would be as follows: I. Institute a program to determine ultimate land use and method of achieving same (presently planning reserve). 2. Implement the plan to achieve objective Item I. 49*A The team would use the following developmental strategy: I. Keep the Administration and the Council informed through periodic administrative reports, so a political cooperative effort can be maintained. 2. The project team would join in a cooperative effort with the owner to achieve; a. Neutralization of the site issues. b. Cooperative implementation of a plan to achieve ultimate land use. 3. Concurrently follow alternative legal approaches in case the cooperative effort fails. The project team solicits any Council advice on this matter. RCP:cw cc: R. Picard J. Behrens J. Polin G. Hutton File Sflo CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINCTON BEACH - To Floyd G. Belsito, From John B. Vogelsang City Administrator Department of Deve opment Services Subject Update on progress at the Date January 23, 1979 Steverson Mud Dump I talked to Mr. Lawmaster, soils engineer for Mr. Steverson, this morning on the. progress of the Steverson Mud Dump.. His continents to me were as follows: As soon as the weather settles down they will finish the slope on the north side of the property and they will also construct a new dyke in the east/west direction toward the south portion of the property. This dyke should take about one month to construct if not interrupted with rain. They have submitted their plans to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board and the plans have been approved. When this dyke- is finished, the property will have a capability of containing .three concurrent hundred-year storms. I checked with. Mr. Steve Herara of the CRWQCB, and he verified that they had approved the plans for this new dyke and that when it is completed the Steverson Brothers ' mud dump will comply with all of their requirements. JBV/vl cc: Fire Chief D Ep � � AN251979 D CITY OF HUNTINGTON ADAJ1N1SnMTIVE OFF,B EAC'1 C.,'TY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH . INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION 1IIIVIIN(,1 ON II.A(II . To Gail Hutton, From John F ens , Interim Director City Attorney of Dev ent Services Subject Steverson Mud Dump Date Decemb 26 , 1978 The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize some of the things that have occurred on the subject site during the last year and particularly following the partial failure of the enclosing dikes during the rains of last January and February. Substantial work has been done to correct the failure of the dikes under a grading permit issued by this department. The grading plans and the corrective measures were designed and prepared by appropriately qualified Civil Engineers experienced in soils mechanics . This work not only corrected the dike failures but rearranged the drainage patterns so that the entire dike area, with the necessary exception of the outer slopes , drains into the property. Substantial internal work has been done to reinforce the dikes and to reduce the fluid pressures exerted on them. The dikes have been raised to a uniform height as a necessary measure to contain the runoff. They have also been widened to provide for improved access as well as a substantially greater cross-section for containing the materials . Within the mud dump proper the area has been partitioned by interior dikes running both east/west and north/south. Through this process and additional filling, the surface area of the waste material within the site has been substantially reduced. The banks of the dikes where the grading work has been done have been flattened and erosion control measures will be provided to prevent excessive runoff. Part of the erosion control will be accomplished by plantings. The owners have also cooperated by opening the access point on Hamilton so that vehicles using the dump site will enter at a point substantially removed from the residential area to the east. While it is not the responsibility of the city and the city, in fact, has no authority in the area, the attached letter from' the Regional Water Quality Control-Board to Mr. Steverson indicates that that agency is following up on their. requirements for the containment of storm waters on the site and the required plan for .preventing discharges of waste from the site. . C yam:- .,•f Hutton ge 2 December 26, 1978 At the present time I am not aware of any violation of the laws or ordinances enforced by the city on the Steverson Mud Dump site. In a recent conversation with Mr. Steverson ' s attorney a very positive interest on the part of the property owner in working with the project team was expressed. Obviously property owner participation will be necessary if, in fact, the problem presented by the existence of this facility is to be resolved in the best interest of the community. Again it is clear to me, and warrants restating, that one of the greatest impediments to resolving the problem presented by this facility is the existence of certain mineral rights not owned by the owner of the property. While these rights may be of little actual value, they can nevertheless present an extremely significant nuisance value. This problem could best be overcome through the exercise of eminent domain. It is this type of problem which necessitated the redevelopment concept. JFB/vl cc: Floyd G. Belsito Jim Palin Mike Zambory Chief Picard MUD HAULING ®EALERS IN VIL FI'ELP SCRAP STEVERSON DROSID P.O. BOX 335 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 Phone 847.1072 July 10, 1978 Huntington Beach City Council 1~ �' e� '"^ �VA Post Office Box, 190 -- Huntington Beach, California 92648 i Dear City Council Mambers : The following has been paid to: R.J. Lovingier, Inc. * March 17th 9542.77 April 12th 8741.48 May 31st 9884.80 May 31st 1558.78 June 14th 18,898.87.. Total : 48,626.70 Invoices just received : June 23rd 23,855.64 June 30th 7487.90 Total : 79,970.24 The following paid to: H.V. Lawmasters& Co., Inc. April 24th 644.00 M 3 s May 1 t 3 300.00 July 7th 800.00 Total : 4,744.00 Grand Total : $84,714.24 Carl R Steverson Steverson Brothers J yGf✓T�y�r r Ail, July 6, 1978 4/ oyOYo�F,p�, 1'r> To It= It May Concern: Although we are unable to attend the Council Meeting July 18 concerning the Steverson Mud Dump we would like it known that we are upset by the' Dumps odor and also all the dirt.it carries onto Magnolia Street. We hope stems action will be taken as soon as possible. 11r. & r-lrs. Rudi Van Mil 21902 Kiowa Lane Huntington Beach, Ca: 92646 D J lJ L j_ 0 1979 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL OFFICE ar � ��y s LJ� CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ERDEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION Leo INTER-DEPARTMENT- I I � HUN"NGWN BEACH JTo Flo G. Belsito, From John Floyd ens, Director City Administrator Build Community Development Subject Steverson, Mud Dump Update . Date May .31, 978 Since the last report on this subject on May 1, 1978., the following has .occurred: May 12, 197.8 A meeting of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board -- Santa Ana Region was held in Costa Mesa to review the first report submitted .to that Board by Steverson Brothers :as .required in their Cease'.'and' Desist. Order No. 78-107. The Board found the report acceptable. May 10, 1978 The report concerning prior' Council action of 1971 and 1972 concerning declaration of the mud dump as a public nuisance was submitted by Jeri Chennel. May 12, 1978 A report was .submitted .by Ed .Selich that indicated the present use of the property was probably' a legal, although nonconforming, use. May 15, 197 8 As a, result of the Steverson Brothers' - failure to submit the required soils investigation report and. program for the correction of the failure .of the dikes along Hamilton Avenue this department forwarded a �request for prosecution for violation of the Huntington .Beach Municipal Code to the City Attorney's office. May 16,' 197 8 . After observing that work was underway at the mud dump., this department addressed a letter. to Mr. Steverson citing the fact that, although the work being done probably qualified under an exemption .from grading permit requirements, care should be taken that work not proceed too far prior to the submittal and approval of a soil engineer's report. We again. urged submittal of the engineer's report at the earliest possible date. 'r. Floyd G. Belsito Page 2 May 31, 1978 May 18, 1978 After receiving, indirectly, a letter from R. J. Lovingier, Inc. describing work that was in progress and additional work proposed, this department again addressed a letter to the Steverson Brothers citing the fact that R. J. Lovingier, . Inc. were not properly licensed to practice soils engineering and again urging that before work progressed to the point that it might have to be removed or redone they submit the properly prepared investigation and design to this department. May 31, 1978 A hearing had been set for 3:00 p.m. today in the City Attorney's office for Mr. Steverson to appear and to show cause why the city should not ti proceed with criminal prosecution for violation of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code as requested by the department on May 15th. At the request by the Attorney for Steverson Brothers that hearing was rescheduled to 2:00 p.m. on Monday, June 5, 1978. May 31, 1978 The department received, through the City Administrator' s office, a letter to Mr. Steverson from the Water Quality Control Board that a meeting has been set for June 9 , 1978, in the Upland City Council Chambers at which time the Board will consider a staff report regarding the status of Mr. Steverson's efforts to comply with their Cease and' Desist Order issued April 14, 1978. A copy of that staff report is attached. JFB/vl attachment " California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana. Region June 9, 1978 ITEM: 28.d. SUBJECT: Status of Actions by Steverson Brothers pursuant to Cease and Desist Order No. 78-107. t :,..>... DISCUSSION The situation is unchanged since the previous status report presented at the last Board meeting. Steverson Bros, is waiting for a final report from their consultants before proceeding with repair worn of the containment dikes. The report was to he submitted May 15, 1978, but it had not been received as of May 26, 1978. The liquid level within the site has been reduced to the point whe---e seepage through the dike no longer occurs. Consequently there is 00 immediate threat of a major dike failure. RECOMMENDATION: The staff T011 continue to monitor Steverson Bros. ' progress. If dike repair efforts are not initiated in the near future, referral to the Attorney General will be made. s 'i'. Affidavit of Putlication State of California l County of Orange y as City of Huntington Beach ))) George Farquhar, being duly sworn on oath, says: That he is a ��' ®� �J�j citizen of the United States, over the age of twenty-one years. That he is the printer and publisher of the Huntington Beach HEARING News, a weekly newspaper. of general circulation printed and pub- lished in Huntington Beach, California and circulated in the said County of Orange and elsewhere and published for the dissemination of local and other news of a general character, and has a bona fide NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN. that a public hearing subscription list of paying subscribers, and said paper has been Hunt- established, printed and published in the State of California, and will be field by the City,Council of the City .of Hunt- County of Orange, for at least one year next before the publication ingtbn .Beach,. at an adjourned 'meeting thereof to of the first insertion of this notice; and the said newspaper is not devoted to the interest of, or published for the entertainment of any to be held'at Edison.High,School, corner of Magnolia particular class, profession, trade, calling, race or denomination, or and Hamilton in Huntington Beach, at the hour of . any number thereof. I • The Huntington Beach News was adjudicated a legal newspaper 7:36 P'W or as soon thereafter as possible, on of general circulation by Judge G. K. Scovel in the Superior Court :Monday, the 22nd day of March, 1971, for the pur- ,of.Orange County, California August 27th, 1937 by order No. A-5931. i ` • _pose of receiving -evidence that a public nuisance That the NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARTNQ 4. exists at the mud dump located" at the southwest corner of Magnolia,Street and Hamilton Avenue, and of which the annexed is a printed copy, was published in said news- for the passible.direction by the City Council to the City Attorney.to take civil action to abate such public paper at least one issue nuisance .under Section 731 of the California Cade of Civil Procedure. commencing from the 11th day of March All persons who can testify as to the facts which 19 71 , and ending on the -11th day of March constitute.a. public nuisance are invite_d to attend said ,hearing. Further information may be obtained 19 71 both days inclusive, and as often during said period and :from the office.'-of the City Clerk. times of publication as said paper was regularly issued, and in the regular and entire issue of said newspaper proper, and not in a DATED: February 171 1971. supplement, and said notice was published therein on the following dates, to-wit: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Mar, 11, 1971 - py: Paul C. Jones, City Clerk Published Huntington Beach News ioar. 11..1971. l7`? - Pu sher I T / I�l•'I' Subscribed and sworn to before me this 12 t h day of March 19 71 .� Notary Public i range County, California ��► , THOMAS D. WYLLIE Notary Public-California 5 m Orange County • - My Commission Explrof September 12, 1974 Sy. of Huntington Bedch County of Orange aZ®EL' State of California r - Gleatiz: By DE3AN Dl9(NGEY ' Af fidavitof Publication of GEORGE FARQUHAR Publisher Huntington Beach News S Filed z Clerk is BY Deputy Clerk RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-3041 (plus postage) SENT TO POSTMARK DATE M William C. Carlson, Jr. Atty. STREET AND NO. 18080 Beach Blvd. P.O.,00 STATE AND ZIP CODE CQ Huntington Beach, CA 92648 OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered ............ 150 •+ RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only............ 650 2. Shows to whom,date and where delivered.. 350 SERVICES With delivery to addressee only............850' Q DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...................................................... 50d z — - - SPECIAL DELIVERY (2 pounds or less) .......................................... 450 1 POD Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) I July 1969 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL a cvQ_'.e9 .+. ISTICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE,AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES.(see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached,and present the article at a post office service wirdc" or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If vary want a return receipt, write the certified-mail.number and your name and address on a le'turn'receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends.. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that service is requested. 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-304 (plus postage) SENT TO POSTMARK Mrs. J. P. Juergens OR DATE M - STREET AND NO. 21.671 Bahama Ln. 0 r P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE CV 'Ffuntington Beach, CA 9264 OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN t. Shows to whom and date delivered ............ 150 ETURN R With delivery to addressee only............650 2. Shows to whom,date and where delivered.. 350 SERVICES With delivery to addressee only............850 Q --DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...................................................... 506 ---- - - SPECIAL DELIVERY (2 pounds or less) .......................................... 450 POD Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED- (See other side) July 1969 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL II GPO:1969 0-359-312 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE,AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES.(see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article,leaving the receipt attached,and present the article at a post office service window or hand i', tp your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not wart this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If yq_p want a return receipt, write the certified-mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. 'Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If.you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that service is requested. 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-304, (plus postage) SENT TO POSTMARK t� _ STEVERSON BROS. OR DATE STREET AND 18062 Gothard Street �t 00 P.O.,STATE AND ZIP CODE N Hunftngton Beach, CA OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETUKN 1.1 Shows to whom and date delivered ............ 15E RECEi` With delivery to addressee only............ 650 2."Shows to whom,date and where delivered.. 350 SERVICES With delivery to addressee only............ 850_ Q DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...................................................... 506 SPECIAL DELIVERY (2 pounds or less) .......................................... 4: e l POD Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) July 1969 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL s A...,a.o STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE,AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES.(see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached,and present the article at a post office service window or hand fit to your rural,.carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not wont this receipt" postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a rqurn receipt;,Nrite the certified-mail number and your name and address on a return receipt ard, Form All, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee;'endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that service is requested.'-, 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. INSTRUCTIONS TO DELIYERII EMPLOYEE ❑ Show to whom,date,and 'u.jivar ONLY address where delivered ❑to addressee (Additional charges required for these services) RECEIPT F Received the numbered article described below. REGISTERED NO. SIGNATURE OR NAME OFF AADDRE E(Alast always befilkdio) CE YIFIED NO 1 �1' /� ' Uk 284136 2 SIGNATURE OF ADDRESSEE'S AGENT,IF ANY INSURED NO. DATE DELIVERED SHOW WHERE DELIVERED(onlyif reg,est d) s c56-16-71698-10 apa POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE TO AVOID OFFICIAL BUSINESS PAYMENT OF POSTAGE.SSDD o POSTMARK OF DELIVERING OFFICE tiI b INSTRUCTIONS: Show name and address below and c plete instructions on other side, where applicable. P oisten gummed ends, attach and hold firmly to back RETURN of article. Print on front of article RETURN T� RECEIPT REQUESTED. 1*00 NAME OF SENDER Paul C. Jones, City Clerk-City of HB t" STREET AND NO.OR P.O.BOX e T.O. Box 190 POST OFFICE,STATE,AND ZIP CODE g Huntington Beach CA 91 . 8 Mud numP heartng INS i RUCTIONS TO DELIVERING EMPLOYEE IShow to whom, date,and Deliver ONLY address where delivered ❑ to addressee (Additional charges required for these servsces) RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below. REGISTERED NO. SIGNATURE OR NAME OF ADDRESSEE(Muss always hefitkdia) CERTIFIED NO 1 284134 SIGNATURE OF ADDRESSEE'S AGENT,IF ANY WNSURED NO. DATE DELIVERED SHOW WHERE DELIVERED(only if requested) MAR 8 197 a .ti o55-10-71518-10 apo M 1FFICE DEPARTMENT PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE TO AVOID _FPICIAL BUSINESS PAYMEOILOf POSTAGE.S3DD .--_',[3ELIVERING Q�FICE s 1917 41 . .�' INSTRUCT10N5: Show name and address below and complete instructions on other side, where applicable. p 3 Moisten gummed ends, attach and hold firmly to back RN of article. Print on front of article RETURN TO REQUESTED. < NAME OF SENDER CITY. OF6HUNTINGTON BEACH, City Clerk erf STREET AND NO. OR P.O. BOX 0 P.O. Box 190 W POST OFFICE,STATE, AND ZIP CODE Huntington Beach, CA 92648 A4...,-,, ;Tnvin4 INSTRUCTIONS TO DELIVERING EMPLOYEE ❑ Show to whom, date,and Deliver ONLY address where delivered ❑ to addressee (Additional charges required for these services) RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below. REGISTERED NO. SIGNATURE OR NAME OF ADDRESSEE(Mast always befilledra) CERTIFIED NO. I 284135 2 SIGNAT&i OF ADDRESSEE' GENT, IF ANY INSURED NO. DATE DELIVERED SHOW WHERE DELIVERED(pnlyif re,7Yesled) MAP 111 05-16-71548-10 GPO POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE TO AVOID OFFICIAL PUSINESS PAYME .OF'POSTAGE..f300 OF,OO o G�0 IV -•� STMARIK �� -� ,,.�•"•' 4YERING OFFICE•` INSTRUCTIONS: Show name and address below and complete instructions on other side, where applicable. Moisten gummed ends, attach and hold firmly to back RETURN of article. Print on front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. ` TO .c NAME OF SENDER :8_•dl( CITY CLERK, CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH cv) 9 STREELANb. Q$OP.O. x'19O r j� 7 61 POST OFFICE,STATE,AND ZIP CODE ° Huntington Beach, CA 92648 2-1 u ump earin€ s -af NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, at an adjourned meeting "thereof- to be held at Edison High School, corner of Magnolia and Hamilton in Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7 :30 P.M. 4 or as soon thereafter as possible, on Monday, the 22nd day of March, 1971, for the purpose of receiving evidence that a public nuisance exists at the mud dump located at the southwest corner of Magnolia '. Street and Hamilton Avenue, and for the possible direction by the City Council to the City Attorney to take civil action to abate such public nuisance under Section 731 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. All persons who can testify as to the facts which constitute a public nuisance are invited to attend said hearing. Further information may be obtained from the office of the City Clerk. DATED: February 17, 1971 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: Paul C. Jones City Clerk � r f 1 ~ fir d:,�l: r` / ,� , C;$ � ✓ � k JAN 151911 Pile ro, M 61.' ::Levenson Brothers Company 18062 sothard .-Jtreet Huntington Beach, California Gentle,-en: The County of t)range Air 'ol.luti.on Control District informed thi.s .d?q;art- ment that merca?'lan like odors were detected frost. your disposal site loented southwest of Hamilton and Magnolia witl-iin the City of Huntington Xich duri.r: the eveni-ng hours -f. January 1.2, 1971 as the resu; t of dt.,ap- irg or ti's. ile origin of ttiCS.^ 1.'aSt.f•? Wa �C ited bV ti1G Crlli'. driver to be t:,l: ;!- .. -.)il i:e.finery in _.ong i;�!ac.h. 11i15 Iot---cr is t•:) scrve is notification that this i-yi)e ira not :,C. Jhts sit«- in 3CCordall'!C .CiLO !.ndu,trini r'+• 1 n ll t'rovisgor, of r.I)�.� per!nit St11tc:P.. .'L1Tif:iiiJ.l.( (j!:;:iDi.`. , ,:Cr;.a� S .`iil"ail. / be t?_1:=e rGt%:L'i _[li•1, FtI,.. 'ri..>:._. t'S ':rOi'1 oil. .!r• rJ.n, 1::_::! ... :r.evj..,? . ski.Inmed off. conti-iaous'y. Gins t 11.1 w„stt'. ; _o!t .ist r_. ?rih . rock, -rnavel _.rid conL-z_.(1 b. frn- _.:ts d. i Astor and plasrer board E:�nu C.ac ut red r;l bor ^roj- c t_ 1 . tee) mii.i : 1Ia: ly If i.rl the future, ...nterf.p1s otiler thai: :.r. . r.cvi.s'_. rl 3 aria J'•.tiCr':Ul ::ithin i.ht•S 51 e , tii a ind"'1;itri:ti ,,t:. .:G i.'_b''U:.:1.1 _-er.nit �0. ),i`. 4.-f.l l b- Sti!) Ine, cd to ION :)Z ::[.. _ .: i ,.1:`i c.." ;Yo`. iUcQ for in c.xi!ivin7 ordinance. A copy oi- --'crmit 98,\ is encloc:ed 14;8131 fo: your '.'a y truly ,:,t:i': . rater. .'o? ;u; Lyn (.'... ; r, i_ :' i.l:eer - 1' ! I .c. :. 'i;;? wlt::'y of` ?er.^.it: ;. City nE liuntin;;t:on i;each i'erwit ti 'p r JAN 15 1911 �•a� File Fo. M161.00 Y Stevenson Brothers Company 18062 Gothard .;treet- Huntington Beach, U'Lifornia Gentlemen: The County of •irange Air 1'ollution Control Diotrict informed this del art- men; that mercaDtan like odors were detected from your disposal site lucated southweF,t of Hamilton and liagnolia within the City of Huntington leach durini the evening hours of .1anuary 12, 1971 as tl:e result of dump- ing of ,a t,_:,. Ilie origin of these: vaste: was stated by the truci: driver ! to be rr< ... !.-o ( .;il refinery in u;:ac.h. This leter is to serve as rot.i�:ic.ltion thar_ Triaterials of this type are not per!''i t L e d :it. Lhis sitf, in accordan=e with ,ndu6ltritll 1:aste -:1:�=Jsa1 E lermit No. y `•',, issued 4/13/61 . vision 3 of t:hi_s nerwit states: shall G he Gla ,sa jI1 ,..^tcriai. except as wnstc :, ;. I.'• L, •>e. �)l clay-b-)se ro,:cr) :,,:.. ::1:.Le (:c': o L,;.�;c:s =:rc+ i ( oil roe: ..:L"Crl•-l.`. (il:.;:f+t l )f;n,.l be ` skimmed af.f Co-ati:.(wus'_y. ;lass III W;1:t.es 1: ;is1. ® 11. ::arid . rock, Srpvc l n nd C T'.:.CCC b. Asphalt pavin;; frr;�T;:ont:. C. GI :;s d. Pl.istor and plaster board e. i;anuf.-ictt red rubbr.r proJucts f. tee]. mill. !-,la:, ly If in the future, material : other than. t.)-o ;o . puc�fied in . rovision 3 l" :o�:1 c-t:rr.it are c?bsc:r•.�(xi within :.i,iu- site , theni;•.c:,:;;cri:., :� �:;ta i� • lio. 98A will. be nu`,jec•ted to a .:U.< l i:::I.0,d or. lit,lvi 'i'IC}: a;- pravid-(1 for in existing ordinan.c.e. A copy of ;'crmit 9f•.A is enclosed a--::yin foi y:.)ur informat ion. a, (l f i lc.,, . Very truly yours, 11. G. JT':w.'nc 141iter. Pollut i:)n Control i'.n ;i.ncer 3R:gd Lnc!. cc: AP[.;l) w/cpy of "ermit 4 Cv:4:Q(.13--�mz ' Citv of Huntington Beach Perwit M E M O R A N D U M TO: Honorable Mayor an.i City Council FROM: Environmental Council of the City of Huntington Beach DATE: April 14 , 1971 SUBJECT: MUD DUMP - CORNER HAMILTON $ MAGNOLIA STREETS The Environmental Council has made a thorough study of the mud dump and we respectfully submit this report of our find- ings and recommendations for action by the City . The follow- ing recommendations are based upon the findings of the Mud Dump Committee of the Environmental Council . Their findings are given in detail below: RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ACTION 1 . The Dump should be formally declared to be a Public Nuisance . City Council should take this action at the continuation of the hearing to be held on April 19 , 1971 . By formally declaring the dump to be a public nuisance in fact, the Council will enable the city to take action on the matter, and allow the City Attorney to obtain the cooperation of the owners of the dump . However, without a formal declara- tion of the existance of a public nuisance , the City will be powerless to act in the matter at all . 2 . Dumping operations should be halted at once. The great need at this time is to end the public nuisance value of the dump and to protect the local residents from the dangers to their lives and health which it presents . It seems obvious that this cannot be done while adding to the problem by continued dumping . If this produces a ' financial hardship for the owners of the dump, the city should take some interim action to reduce the hardship , such as forgiving the taxes on the property while it is being converted to some more productive use . 3 . A svl-id fence should be constructed around the dump immediately. The present fence is wholly inadequate because it is easily climbed by children and allows all kinds of pets to enter the area with ease . A solid wooden or block wall at least eight feet high and topped by a barbed-wire overhand is needed immediately to prevent further access zo the site . P.- Honorable Mayor anu City .Council April 14 , 1971 Page 2 Without such - wall_ it is only a matter of time until a child is killed in the dump . 4 . The odors coming from the dump should be stopped as soon as possible . Once the dumping has stopped and a fence has been built to protect the site , the odors of the dump should be controlled by application of prteroleum-eating bacteria. This treatment has already been shown to remove the oil sludge from the dump in a small test area and to reduce the odor to a minimum. However , it will do nothing about the mud, which presents the greatest danger to local residents , and the greatest problem in attempting to return the site to productive use . . 5 . A study of possible methods for reclaiming the site should be undertaken. The dump site has a potential value of about $1 , 500 ,000 if it can be reclaimed and put to some other, more productive use . Many methods for doing this have been proposed, but no one seems to know which of them may be feasible, or how much each one might cost. An independent engineering study of the various methods and their costs is badly needed, and should begin immediately A study program such as that proposed to City Council by Professor Dawson of California State College at Long Beach would be ideal . : 6 . The costs of these actions should be shared by the dump owners and tFie city. The owners of the dump stand to gain financially from reclaiming the dump site for more productive uses . As outlined below, the site has a potential value of some $1 , 500 ,000 , and the present use as a dump is only marginally profitable now and is expected to become less so in the future . Thus , they should bear some of the costs of the reclamation of their property . On the other hand, they are not entirely to blame for the present situation, and they should not be forced to bear a financial loss because of it . The City also stands to gain from the reclamation project, since the site is surrounded by homes and schools , and a public park is to be built directly across Hamilton Ave . from the dump . The situation is tailor-made for a joint effort by the city and the owners . The only way such an effort is possible , however, is for the City Council to declare the dump to be a public l,uisance in fact . For without such a declaration, the City cannot act at all . Honorable Mayor and City Council April 14 , 1971 Page 3 FINDINGS 1 . The mud dump is a "Public Nuisance in Fact" for these reasons : a. Odors : It is difficult to prove that a source of odors is a public nuisance in the legal sense because every person detects an odor differently, and is bothered by it to a greater or lessor extent than any other person. This was well demonstrated at the hearing on March 22 , 1971 by Mr . Davis of the City Oil Department and Mr . Wells of the Orange County APCD. Both of these men can claim to be trained experts in the detection and analysis of odors , yet they disagreed completely about the intensity and nuisance value of the odors from the mud dump . Neverthe- less , the dump does emit odors (both men agreed on this point) , and the people who work and live near it are bothered by them. The residents of the Fashion Shores development (across Magnolia Street from the dump) have given ample testimony to this fact in their petition to City Council (408 of them signed it) and at the hearing on March 22 . The nuisance value of the odors was also 6 confirmed by the Principal of Edison High School in his testimony that office workers and teachers at the high school have been sent home on several occasions because of odors from the dump . Thus , the odors certainly do represent a public nuisance , in spite of the fact that this would be difficult to prove in a court of law. b . Attractive Nuisance : Many residents near the dump report great curiosity from their children about what is on the other side of those high dirt banks at the corner of Hamilton and Magnolia . Dr. Mason-Is children have even asked for permission to climb the fence and "Just see what is in there" (permission was denied) . This curiosity has intensified lately because of the publicity connected with the very bad odors produced by the dump on January 12 , 13 and 14 , 1971 . Dr . Mason has also seen several teenagers on top of the bank on two occasions during the past three weeks , and has personally prevented two young children (ages 9 to 10 years) from climbing the dirt bank after they were observed climbing the chain-link fence surrounding the dump . These observa- tions were made while passing the dump on other errands , and one wonders how many other incidents go unnoticed. c . Accegsibility: The present chain-! .iiik fence surrounding the dump is wholly inadequate . Children can climb it easily (the two children observed by the author got over it in less than ten seconds) , and it is so open that small cats and dogs can get through it without difficulty . e Honorable Mayor ar -.ity Council April 14 , 1971 Page 4 Children and pets do not understand that the contents of the dump are extremely dangerous , and in their curiosity they can get into it and be injured before they know what is happening to them . This easy accessibility would be removed by the construction of a solid wall as outlined in recommendation 3 above . Even a regular patrol of the existing fence would help a great deal . But none of this is being done now, and while the dump remains so accessible , it presents a clear and present danger to the local residents . d. Danger to Life and Health: Anyone who looked at the dump from the bank or an airplane can appreciate its potential dangers . It looks like a smooth lake . However , this 37 acre area is really filled with an estimated 80 foot depth of material that acts like quicksand which is covered by a 6-12 inch layer of water with varying amounts of crude oil floating on top. Once in this goo , it is difficult to get out again, and drowning is a good possibility, especially for a child or small animal . Even if the child or pet does extricate himself from the dump , he is covered with think oil sludge and chemicals which burn the skin and eyes and which are very difficult to remove . An example of the damage this combination can do is provided by a small dog that got into the dump and out again and managed to get home before collapsing . It required two solid days of scrubbing and $50 in veterinarian bills to save the dog 's life . Thus , it is obvious that the mud dump is , in fact, a public nuisance . Each of the four points above, taken separately, is sufficient justi- fication for this claim. Taken together , they make it mandatory that the City take action to relieve the problem and protect the local residents from the dangers of the dump . We believe that the best possible action would be a cooperative effort between the City and the owners to reclaim the site for other uses , removing the dangers and nuisances at the same time . To do this , the City Council must declare the dump to be a "Public Nuisance in Fact", as requested by the City Attorney, for without this formal declaration, the City cannot act in the matter . 2 . Reclamation of the site : It is clear from our study of the problem that very little is known about how the dump might be cleaned up and returned to a more prod,!ctive use (such as housing or small industries) . Many suggestions have been made , but no one seems to know whether any of them will work or how much they will cost . Therefore, we believe thai a thorough engineering study of the feasibility and costs of all possible methods should be made. Honorable Mayor and City Council April 14, 1971 Page 5 A program such as that proposed by Professor Dawson (mentioned in the Recommendations section) would be ideal , and the costs should be shared equally by the City and -the Steverson Brothers . Its findings would form the basis of an action plan to reclaim the 37 acres of the dump for some suitable use . In such a use , the property should be worth at least $40 ,000 per acre , or a total of about $1 , 500 , 000 . The major goal of the study should be to find .a method for reclaiming the site which will allow the owners to realize at least some profit from the operation. The use of bacteria to decompose the oil wastes in the dump should also be mentioned. While this is a proven method to relieve one of the major problems of the dump (odors) , it will cost about $80 , 000 and will only remove the oil wastes . After the bacterial treatment is completed, about ten million gallons of mud and other materials dumped over the last twenty-five years , will still have to be disposed of . The recommended engineering study is needed to find ways to handle this residue economically . 3 . Profitability of the dumping operation: At the March 22 , 1971 public hearing , the Steverson Brothers stated that the present rate of dumping on the site is 4 or 5 loads of rotary drilling mud per day, for which they receive $25 per load . Some income is also derived from skimming operations which yield saleable crude oil , but this was stated to be very small Thus , income from this use of the property can be only about $1S0 per day, and is probably somewhat less than that . This amounts to a maximum annual income of about $S0 ,000 per year . Taxes on the property are about $900 per year . At least one man must be on duty at the dump at all times . In addition, the skimming operation must involve at least two or three men. ?aith their salaries , fringe benefits and other expenses , and federal , state and local taxes , as well as administrative costs , the expenses of running the dump cannot be very much less than the income . But, even if these costs are only $25 , 000 , the annual profit from an entire year ' s operations would amount to only about $25 ,000 . This is a very small gain indeed, from 37 acres of land which has a potential market value of at least $1 , 500 , 000 . It is also important to note that the profitability of the dump has been declining steadily over the past ten years or more, and is expected to decline still further in the future . If the dump is still profitable now, it will not continue to be so for much longer . If nothing is done now to end the problem, what is likely to occur when the dump becomes a liability to the owners? it seems very probable that they would just stop dumping and abandon the place , leaving it a continuing danger and nuisance to the local residents , and a problem which the City would eventually have to face alone . Honorable Mayor and City Council April 14 , 1971 Page 6 This report prepared and submitted by : The Mud Dump Committee Environmental Council J. W. Mason, PhD. , Chairman R. E. Winchell , PhD. W. K. Olson Margaret A. Carlberg , Chairman Environmental Council t 1 1 Fri S AGENDA FOR PUBLIC; HEARING ON MUD DUMP MARCH 22, 1971 7 30 Item 1 : Dick Harlow✓ Item 2 : Jim Wheeler✓ Item 3 : Gerald Bower v Item 4 : (Optional) Herb Day , Item 5 : Citizens : (1) Mrs . Juergens (2) Mr. James Mason (3) Mr. Ernest Pascoe (4) Mrs . Susan Torkells Item 6 : Introduce Petitions - Paul Jones Item 7 : Introduce . Questionaires Item �A; Dovle Miller tem Su ation by City Attorney Item 9 : Mr. Carlson Item. 10 : Summation, by Carlson Item 11 : Disbribution - of proposed findings and agreement to Council Item 12 : Deliberation by Council Item 13: Findings Item 14 : Conclusions ' Item 15 : - Decis on .and instructions to City Attorney In the�.event the finding is.'-that it is a public nuisance-, the City Council directs the City- Attorney to file a--civil .action in. Superior Court to abate the nuisance : C .C'.P . 731 F ^ A 3 March i971 r TO ; City CaunC..iI C ity Administrator FRO "'i : City Attorney SUBJEC1' : Format f(�.r, Public Herring HeE arding 'Publi c Edison high Sc;hgol Crrifet.e:r. i.a ; March 22 , 1971. Fursti.ant to Counci_1 direction we submit the fell{Thing format fov public hearing regarding declaration of rui once . 3uC1i hearing to determine whether a, public nuiz ar:ce exists rel,:i-- t_tve to the mud dump a ; Magnol.i a and Hamilton In the C`i_t , of Huntington Eyeach shall be conducted a,-3 follows : 1 . The City Council shall. br� trte hearing board to cort- ,t sider t:',e evidence and determine by resolution whk::the.r or a riot to declare a public nuisance . $ 2 . The city shall be represented by the City A',:torney ':i Office which has the "unction of presenting evidence of any public nu.i. ance . 3 . Steverson Bros . may be represented by coun:ti,,ei of its choice who shall be allowed to dispute the exis.te±ice of a nuisance . 4 . The proceeding will be recorded by a court reporter . S . Each side tihall be allowed a brief (iive minute) opening stat.errient to explain the pur°poe of their evidence and what they expect tine Council. to find in thls matter. 6 . The city shall present its case first . 7. A fter the city 's' case , the Steverson Br c., . :riay present its evidence . 8. Each side shall be allowed a br?ef rebuttal . 9 . After both: sides have completed their` case , they s1hal l be allowed opportunity for a summation or closing argument (ten minutes each side . 10 . Each side shall be limited to one hour, overall, for ' . 1 . . K' 1 ' 1x4 presentation of evidence and arguments . p 11 . The following rules shall prevail regarding the exa.: i.nation of witnesses : (a) Oral evidence shall be taken orsly on oath or affi r-ma.tion: (b) Each party shall have these right,,, , To wall or examine witnesses ; To introduce exhibits ; i .Pc cross-examine opposing wttnes,ses bn any ,natter , relevant to the 'issues even though that ma..ter was not covered in the direct examination; To impeach any witness rega.rdles._, of which p,'--trt:y first called him to testify . (c ) The hearing need not be conducted accoi:ld.i rid.; t,c technical rules relating; to evidence and w.itne,,.:es . Any vcll:o- vant evidence shall be submitted. Irrelevant and unduly repe- titious evidence shall be excluded. 12 . The City Council may call. any witness of its c'�loi ce and it may ,also question any wi..tness during the course of the hearing. 1' . Written aetit.icns may be filed- With the City Clerk and may be received as hearsay evidence as in administrative proceedings . 14 . No opinyons shah be permitted' by a wJ tees : unless 3up- ported by relevant evidence perceived by the witness . This does not apply to expert witnesses . After hearing a.11 of the testimony and arguments , the City Council shall consider the evidence and make findings of fact . It shall then. make a. conclusion, in the form of a reso�- lut_4.on, that' a public nuisance exists or does not exist , arid. if It exits' , it shall instruct th..e City Attorney: to Institute a civil act.-ion to abate such nuisance. Respectfully submitted, DON P. BONFA City Attorney DPB: ahb y l[ LEGAL INSTRUCTIONS REGARDING NUISANCE HEARINGS 1. City legislative bodies are empowered to declare what constitutes a nuisance . CCP 731 . 2 . A public nuisance is defined as anything which is injurious to health, or is indecent or offensive to the senses , or an obstruction to the free use of property, so as to interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property and is something which effects at the same time an entire community or neighborhood, or any considerable number of persons , although the extent of the annoyance or damage inflicted upon individuals may be unequal. California Civil Code H 3479 and 3480 . 3 . A pre-existing use may become a nuisance due to new develop- meat in the area. ' It is no defense to the finding of a nuisance that those complaining of it acquired their property with knowledge of the existence of the said nuisance . 4 Witkin, Summary 2853; Cook v. Hatcher (1932) 9 P. 2d 231. 4 . No one shall be enjoined from the reasonable and necessary operation of any use expressly permitted in the zone , nor shall such use be deemed a nuisance without evidence of the employment of unnecessary and injurious methods of operation. However, . a use that exists as a nonconforming use may not be one that is expressly permitted . If .a use is nonconforming under the zoning ordinance ,. it is more likely to be found to create a nuisance than if it were not so zoned. Code of Civil Procedure. 731.(a) ; People v. Ryan (1936) 61 P. 2d 360 . � a r 5 . An activity withdut..directly damaging or preventing use of the land., may nevertheless disturb or, prevent its comfortable enjoyment . Typical are smoke , noxious odors , and noise , etc . Witkin, Summary of California Law, Volume 4, page 2847 . 6 . The duration or recurrence of the interference or annoying factor is merely one, not necessarily a conclusive factor in determining whether a damage is so substantial as to amount to a nuisance . Quotation from Prosser in Ambrosini v. Alisal Sanitary District (1957). 317 P.2d 33; 1-54 C.A. 2d. . 7 . Test of liability for nuisance with. regard to personal discomfort is the effect of the alleged annoyance on normal persons of ordinary sensibilities . 36 Cal. Jur.2d Nuisances 118, Carter v. Johnson 26 C.R. 279 . 8 . The inconvenience, discomfort or hurt complained of must be such a material annoyance that resulting damages to those allegedly aggrieved .can be presumed. Black' s Law Dictionary, Fourth Edition. a I I I � z PUBLIC NUISANCE HEARING - OUTLINE OF WITNESSES i i The following is an enumeration of those who will be , i j available to testify at the public nuisance hearing: 1. RICHARD HARLUW, Assistant Planning Director - i Mr. Harlow will have with him a map of the area depicting the ` tracts and neighborhood in relation to the dump . He will also I be able to testify as to the zoning and nonconforming nature of 4 said dump . A Non- conforming use is defined as a lawful use existing on the effec- tive date of the zoning restriction and continuing since that time in nonconformance to the ordinance . There is some question as to whether the dump was , at any time , a lawful use . Mr . Harlow i is trying to resolve this with the county planning officials . In any case , it is , at least , a nonconforming use in that it is not permitted under our ordinance which became effective after the existence of the mud dump . 2 . JAMES WHEELER, Director of Public Works . Mr.Wheeler will be available to discuss possible technological means of alleviating or eliminating mud dump problems . His studies are in a preliminary stage , however, he can outline at least three possible means of turning . the mud dump area into something else. 3 . GERALD C. BOWER, President of Cultured Chemical Division of Gerald C . Bower, Inc . Mr. Bower is the president of the company engaged in the bacteria control experiment going on at the mud. dump. i 9 . He can testify to the results of- said :experiment of same application in comparable areas , the .time period involved in correcting the problems. at the mud. dump, cost factors involved, and the fact that he has received total cooperation from the Steverson Brothers to date .. L f'... � .c 4 . HERBERT DAY' Oil Field Superintendent , will be available �- to discuss the role of the mud dump e total oil operation involving the City of Huntington Beach if the question arises . 5 . CITIZENS-WITNESSES . The folder labeled. "Witnesses" have approximately 13 letters that I sent out to people who were contacted by this office and indicated their desire to testify, Previously these people have submitted questionaires which were promulgated by our office or the district attorney ' s office . Questions to these people may be based on the contents of said questionaires . These people are from throughout the affected neighborhood and should provide a fair cross-section of the major i complaints in said neighborhood. In fact , most of the questions can be framed around the questionaire that I drafted and Any other questions you deem necessary in light of the nuisance law and the definitions .of a, public nuisance . I would try to force specifics from these people as to how often they are damaged, in what way, etc . As long as. our questions are specificenough and seek to elicit the facts in view of the4 requirements of the public nuisance , I doubt if Mr . Carlson will conduct any broad - cross-examinations . . 6 . OTHER WITNESSES may be desirable to simply call for other witnesses from .the audience who feel that they might have something to add to what has already been testified to . NOTE: Each witness , prior to testifying, should indicate where they live in relation to the mud dump . Perhaps this could . be pointed on the maps that should be on a• display before the Council . MEMORANDUM: All those questionaires .filled out on forms provided by Orange County Air Pollution Control. District should be turned over and placed in the District Attorney' s file after the hearing and returned to Mr. Hansen. 3 March 1971 TO : City Council City Administrator FROM: City Attorney SUBJECT : Format for Public Hearing Regarding Public Nuisance ; Edison High School Cafeteria; March 22 , 1971 Pursuant to Council direction we submit the following format for public hearing regarding declaration of nuisance . Such hearing to determine whether a public nuisance exists rela- tive to the mud dump at Magnolia and Hamilton in the City of Huntington Beach shall be conducted as follows : 1. The City Council shall be the hearing board to con- sider the evidence and determine by resolution whether or not to declare a public nuisance . 2 . The city shall be represented by the City Attorney 's office which has the function of presenting evidence of any public nuisance . 3. Steverson Bros . may be represented by counsel of its choice who shall be allowed to dispute the existence of a nuisance . 4 . The proceeding will be recorded by a court reporter. 5 . Each side shall be allowed a brief (five minute) opening statement to explain the purpose of their evidence and what they expect the Council to find in this matter. 6 . The city shall present its case first . 7. After the city ' s case , the Steverson Bros . may present its evidence . 8. Each side shall be allowed a brief rebuttal . 9 . After both sides have completed their case , they shall be allowed opportunity for a summation or closing argument (ten minutes each side . 10 . Each side shall be limited to one hour, overall, for 1 . presentation of evidence and arguments . 11. The following rules shall prevail regarding the examination of witnesses : (a) Oral evidence shall be taken only on oath or affirmation; (b) Each party shall have these rights : To call or examine witnesses ; To introduce exhibits ; To cross-examine opposing witnesses on any matter relevant to the issues even though that matter was not covered in the direct examination; To impeach any witness regardless of which party first called him to testify. (c) The hearing need not be conducted according to technical rules relating to evidence and witnesses . Any rele- vant evidence shall be submitted. Irrelevant and unduly repe- titious evidence shall be excluded. 12 . The City Council may call any witness of its choice and it may also question any witness during the course of the hearing. 13• Written petitions may be filed with the City Clerk and may be received as hearsay evidence as in administrative proceedings . 14 . No opinions shall be permitted by a witness unless sup- ported by relevant evidence perceived by the witness . This does not apply to expert witnesses . 15 . After hearing all of the testimony and arguments , the City Council shall consider the evidence and make findings of fact . It shall then make a conclusion, in the form of a reso- lution, that a public nuisance exists or does not exist , and if it exists , it shall instruct the City Attorney to institute a civil action to abate such nuisance . Respectfully submitted, DON P. BONFA City Attorney DPB:ahb �m_i�o[l �a�_�M_n_/_L_.Y Sd✓EA.R Tif�AT �OIJ H/s�4� /��TN/i1/(t t3s/_t Ti�E TiPU7E/ !.� rNE�IESJ_i�!_o.!✓� _l_'l_A 7" JFFfCE MEM®RAN DUN To Doyle Miller, City Administrator Date February 10, 1971 From Vincent G. Moorhouse, Director In Re Mud Dump Harbors, Beaches, & Development Pursuant to your instructions at the Administrative Action Committee meeting on February 4, 1971, I am hereby submitting my recommendations for short term. . solutions to the mud dump problem. A meeting was held in my office on February 9 with the following individuals in attendance: Jim Wheeler, Director-Public Works; 011in C. Cleveland, Director-Building & Safety; Dick Jones, Asst. Director-Building & Safety; Herb Day, Oil Field Superintendent; Mike Miller, Deputy City Attorney; and myself. The purpose of the meeting was to review the various alternatives on existing city laws and the unique background of this situation. After reviewing various possible solutions, we arrived at the following conclusions: 1. Definition of the Problem - the continuation of this type .of- operation has created a definite problem for the residents in that particular part of the city. The owners of the property are aware of public sentiment and have operated this business at the location for numerous years. The City Council has received a signed petition from residents and taxpayers° within the ,city asking that the problem be resolved and the operation discontinued. They have further inquired as to the encroachment of the operators on the public right-of-way. The operator has been notified by -the Water Pollution Control Department that materials were being deposited that were not permitted. 2. Investigation by City Staff a. City Oil Field Department has taken samples and are continuing to take samples of materials being deposited. b\ The Public Works Department has investigated the encroachment by the. operators on public right-of-way. The boundary survey of subject property revealed the following: (1) Hamilton Avenue: No encroachment at the Hamilton-Magnolia inter- section. Three and one-half (32) feet encroachment into Hamilton at the Westerly end of fence line. F (2) Magnolia Street fence line on property line. No encroachment. During the rainy season, materials erode from the dike onto Hamilton. City crews are required from time to time to clean storm drainage ditch between dike and Hamilton Street. c. The city attorney and oil field inspector will make visual inspection of rear of property between flood control channel and dump for possible public nuisance, litter, and debris. At the same investigation, they will check properties adjacent to the mud dump for same conditions. 3. Recommendations - after reviewing the above information and discussing this matter very thoroughly with all departments involved, I would like to make the following recommendations: a. In accordance with the February 1 report from Mr. Mike Miller, Deputy City Attorney, to City Attorney Bonfa and yourself, I feel that due process of law should be followed and that we follow Mr. Miller's recommendation i that a civil action be considered by the Council in the name. of the people y Mr. Doyle Miller -2- February 10, 1971 of the State of California to abate a public nuisance. This is in accordance with Section 731 of the Code of Civil Procedure. To accomplish this, it is imperative that all the facts become known and that all parties involved be given the opportunity to state their case. Therefore, I recommend that the City Council set a public hearing within thirty (30) days for the purpose of deter- mining if there is a public nuisance. b. Recommend that the hearing be set at Edison High School and legally notify all individuals whose names appear on the petition. The Steverson Brothers should be advised of the hearing by registered letter. After the hearing, if the Council determines that a public nuisance does exist, they could then authorize the attorney to seek an injunction to abate the nuisance. c. Mr. Wheeler will advise the Steverson Brothers by letter that their dike system is infringing on public right-of-way. d. Mr. Cleveland will advise the operators of the existing laws and the permits required for any future work that might be conducted on the dike system. e. If the aforementioned recommendations are followed, due process of law could be exercised with the least amount of risk to all parties. There is the possibility, that the courts would not uphold the decisions of the City Council. However, the legislative process will-have to be followed. In the meantime, Mr. Wheeler and the staff will pursue the time consuming task of researching longer term solutions to the problem. Some of the proposals will be in the following areas: (1) Devise a chemical method to solidify the materials and make dumping on the property economically feasible. (2) Create a method of depositing the material in county cut and fill projects through cooperative program with the County Board of Supervisors. (3) Work with the Western Gas and Oil Association and the oil inspector in finding the solution to disposal of this industry's waste products. 4. Conclusions - if the above recommendations are adopted by the City Council, it will allow the following: a. Due process of law to take place. b. It will clearly indicate to the citizens of Huntington Beach that the City Council and staff have assumed a leadership role in resolving this particular problem. c. It will provide the necessary time for staff to research alternative solutions. d. It will allow the city and the owner an opportunity to jointly solve the problem and possibly avoid lengthy litigation which could be costly to both parties. Mr:. Doyle Miller -3- February 10, 1971 5. Exhibits - the following exhibits were collected and used in formulating this report: a. Ltr to Steverson Brothers from James R. Wheeler dtd 2/9/71 b. Memo to Vince Moorhouse from 011in Cleveland dtd 2/8/71 c. " of it 11of James Wheeler dtd 2/8/71 d. ofif it Herb Day dtd 2/8/71 e. Don Bonfa and Doyle Miller from Mike Miller dtd 2/1/71 f. Memo to Doyle Miller from Vince Moorhouse dtd 1/20/71 g. Ken Reynolds from Willis Mevis dtd 11/18/70 h. Ltr to Steverson Brothers from H. G. Osborne, File No. MS61.00 i. Memo to Don Bonfa from Ken Reynolds dtd 10/23/70 j . Copy from Assessor's Map Book 114, Page 15, County of Orange k. Copy of Industrial Waste Disposal Permit No. 98-A, dtd. 4/8/61 from Wm. Fitchen, Director, Water Pollution Control Department Vincent G. oorhouse, Director Harbors, Beaches, & Deveopment VGM/pr Attachments: As above to cc, I .� eor ® LY z—C`vLB��Z x--T:E J ' I I I r I I F r _ All a r� y� .4�.`G� »e7 c its�.�--•q�y� 1 J �'�^"Ez .Y+ �; � � � #f 7+y�•� 6t - +� I - �c F �� �x,�'�r5='y.. ,;��. �a._ �: ,. ,.::� ..#'�.h.�x4; fxi� ,k 9a ,xµ�.#.. - .svk•^ _ i � �t�o� th5� ou 1t�o1<Irv�c�- �i�1 ali���� cuJ51 vti�©� Sc��i� } a�' VVIL�� c�1+t �'evLCr I ref__ rL i-arice �-j p I a _ lad 1tv� i�zj4A row -41 �u 't��°>:. __ _'�'."^":'�-s e.",`a+�.^�'✓''c'� �.�T%a �: _...��`°M�4` ..e��-evwyt-""-`•"9 C wILL 7"A � �c f May 18, 1971 Mrs . Peggy Sword 9092 Bobbie Circle Huntington Beach, CA , 92646 19 Dear Mrs . Sword: The City Council directed me to rite you regarding the latest development in` the rotary mud ,'dump situation. At the meeting held on Monday, May 17, 1971, I1 the Council was informed by the City Administrator that Steverson Brothers' have informed the City that they will cease all dumping operations as of June 1, ,- D .1971, and that the entire area has been fenced in accordance with the request of the City Council. Steverson Brothers have indicated that they will continue with shimming operations of that material which has already been �. deposited' in the dump. They further stated that there .would be, trucks going in and out for this purpose, and for spreading some of the material which has been previously dumped' -in`order to permit it to solidify. The Council indicated that such action will 'at` least be helpful in abating the nuisance . if you have any further questions regarding the matter, please, feel free to contact my office or the City Administrator. Sincerely yours, i Paul C. Jones City Clerk PCJ: pr i RECEWED ' CITY CLERK r I-� OF ffEjft?lItGTC;H 2E.1 CH,CAUF m M E M O R A N D U M To: Council Members From: Ernestina Di Fabio Assistant City Clerk Subject : Letter Re : Mud Dump Per instructions from the City Clerk, the enclosed copy of a letter received by him on Monday, May 10, 1971, is being forwarded for your information. On receipt of the letter, Mr. Jones contacted the Mayor for direction -- Mayor McCracken stated he did not wish this matter to be an agenda item for the meeting of May 17 , 1971, but to send each Council member a copy, and if any member so desired he could bring it up orally. Mayor McCracken further requested Mr . Jones to inform Mrs . Sword that if she had new information to bring to the Council 's attention, she should include it in a letter addressed to the Mayor and Council, Attention: Doyle Miller , City Administrator. Page #13 - Council Minutes - 4/19/71 The Assistant Planning Director presented a resume ' of the Planning Commission 's reasons for recommending approval of Code Amendment No . 71-4. The Clerk- informed Council that all legal requirements for publication and posting on said public hearing had been met and that he had received no communications or written protests to Code Amendment 71-4 or to the recommendation of approval of the Planning Commission. Mayor McCracken declared the hearing open. There being no one present to speak on the matter and there being no protests filed , either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor. On motion by Green, Council sustained the decision of the Planning Com- mission, approved Code Amendment No . 71-4 and directed the City Attorney to prepare -an ordinance amending the Huntington Beach Ord.inance Code to effect same . Motion carried . PUBLIC HEARING - CODE AMENDMENT NO. 71-6 - APPROVED Mayor McCracken announced that this was the day and. hour set for a public hearing on Code Amendment No. 71-6 to consider the following: (1) Amend Article 973 Miscellaneous Provisions,, by adding Section 9730. 15. 1 which shall read as follows: "Right-of-way dedication for oil operation sites shall comply with all the requirements of Article 968, " and (2) Amend Article 968 Combining Oil Districts, by adding cer- tain Sections that will provide for dedication and improvements for oil operation sites . The Clerk informed Council that all legal requirements for publication and posting on said public hearing had. been met and that he had received no communications or written protests to Code Amendment No . 71-6, or to the recommendation of approval of the Planning Commission. The Assistant Planning Director presented a resume ' of the Planning Commission 's reasons for recommending approval of Code Amendment No . 71-6 . Mayor McCracken declared the hearing open. There being no one present to speak on the matter and there being no protests filed either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor. On motion by Bartlett, Council sustained. the decision of the Planning Commission; approved Code Amendment No . 71-6 and d.irected the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance amending the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code to effect same . Motion carried . PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION NO. 3289 - WEED ABATEMENT - ADOPTED Mayor McCracken announced.. that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing on Resolution No . 3289 of the City Council, declaring a nuisance to exist in the form of weeds, and directed. the Clerk to read. the legal notice . The Clerk read notice of public hearing on Resolution No . 3289 of the City Council, as posted conspicuously along all the streets and property within the district described in said Resolution, setting the hour of 7: 30 P.M., or as soon therafter as possible , on Monday, the 19th day of April, 1971, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, - California, as the time and place for a public hearing on a declaration that a nuisance exists and providing for the abatement thereof. The Clerk informed the Council that he had received no communications or written protests to Resolution No . 3289 of the City Council proposing to abate the weed nuisance, and. read the Affidavit of Posting of Notices to Destroy Weeds which had been executed by the Street Superintendent . 4 , O V NTY .O F 1 COUNCILMAN ELDEN GILLESPIE `5 .� •} CHAIRMAN :f�A`N•G E ORANGE COUNTY SOLID WASTE ENFORCEMENT AGENCY 1300 SOUTH GRAND•AVENUE SANTA ANA,CA 92705 (714).834-2976 . August 7 1.979 To All Interested Parties Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Proposed Solid Waste Facility Permit for the As-Con Land Fill :(Steverson Brothers Dump) 30-AB-027. The Proposed Permit was approved at the July 12, 1979 meeting of this Agency, and it has now been forwarded to the State Solid Waste Management Board for review and consideration. Staff of the State Solid Waste Management Board -has indicated that the Proposed Permit will , most probably, be acted on at the State Board's August 30-31, 1979 meeting in San Diego. If you have any comments ,on the terms or conditions of the Proposed Permit, they should be sent to both this Agency and theState Solid Waste Management Board at this. time. If you have any questions on the Proposed- Permit or the permit program in general, please don't hesitate to call . Sincerely, - Michael Luke Executive Officer ML:kh Enclosure ' . ",°,s """" ,°,," °"N°°"""~, "O^""SOLID WASTE FACILITIES , 't ENFORCEMENT AGENCY COUNTY W�STVC F Orange County Solid Waste Enforcement Agency FA CTL TT PROPOSED As-Con Land Fill 7-26-1979 F-i-.Wi�B APPROVAL S. Pugliese FACILITY LOC�A_T_I_0N___ ENFORCEMENT AGHNCY Southwest corner of Magnolia Street and Hamilton ,Avenue in the City of APPROVAL Huntington Beach . FINDINGS The Orange County Solid Waste Enforcement Agency (herein referred to as Enforcement Agency) finds that: ` l. As-Con Land Fill , otherwise known as Steverson Brothers Dump, is an existing Class III solid waste disposal site located On approximately 37 acres of land owned by Steverson Brothers Incorporated. The disposal site is Open to the general public for the disposal of Group 3 wastes, Disposal fees are. charged for use of the Site. ` Approximately 22 acres of the existing 37acre site have been used in the past as percolation/evaporation ponds for the' disposal of rotary drilling muds and waste water brines from oil field opRrdtiODs. The primary objective of the current disposal operation is to fill the previously used percolation/evaporation ponds with Group 3 wastes, and thereby render the site suitable for future development. Although the use to be made of the site, upon completion of the filling operation, is not known at this time, the City of Huntington Beach is examining Various alternatives. The disposal site is open Monday thru Friday from 7:00 A.M. to 6:OO P.M. On the average, approximately 1000 tons per day Of solid waste is being disposed of at the site. The remaining life expectancy of the disposal site is approximately three years. There are no kD0uD changes to be made in the design or operation of the Site prior to its completion. The design and operation of this facility is specified in the Report Of Disposal Information - As-Con Land Fill , dated June 14, 1979, \*hich is hereby made a part of this permit. 2. In addition to this permit, the following documents condition the .design and operation �f this facility: ',tv'^ - This ponnit is granted oo|o|y to the operator named ahova, and in not transferable. Upon a change of operator, this permit is subject to revocation. Upon u significant change in design or operation from that described in this permit o, in attachments thereto for the existing design and operation of facility operating immediately prior to August 15. 1977. or from the approved intended design and operation of u inni|i\y which was not operating prior to August 15. 1977. o, which herein is granted a permit nnodiUoahon, this npnnit in subject to revnoa\ion, nuopon»ioo, modification or other appropriate action. 'This ,enni( does not authorize the operation of any facility contrary to the State minimum Standards for Solid 1,VugoHand|ing and Disposal. This permit o-innot be considered as permission to violate existing laws, ordinances, ,ogu|aUnxn, or statutes of nUhu, government agencies. mponz��rv���a�c�--------'-----'------------- ------- Orange County Solid Waste Enforcement Agency � iI�A�sRa7'-�------'---'---------'-'-----------' PE I- Elden Elden Gillespie '`^= Chairman "°`" Sol''f d Waste: Fac-, iity Pe.rmi:t As.-Con Land: FUJI Pa:.ge 2 A. Waste,'D;ilscharge RequiVremen;ts-, CaIiifarni;a Re.giionall Water, Qu:alli y. C.Ont.rol' BoardYSanta; Anal Regiiam„ Order- Number, 75--178> Indust.ri a]: Waste_ Di s:pos:al Pe:rm f No).. 98A:,, Orange: County- Waiter- Po:hl'uti on Department.. 3.: . The: ex:iist.ingt ld an use: w:i=thiin 1.0.00 feet: off the, dEiisposal sine: is:: M)rt-K f=dire sta:tiion,,, communiityy park-,, siing1e.-famii1y res,Tden:t$& West. - ofiil? well„ Edi son power pliant:,, undbmelloped land',, fl oodi con.t.ro1 channel` Sou:thy fuel of ll s_to:rage: tanks,, roa.dsiider park: East. si;ngfl;e fam7;lly re.s.iidenitiial. 4.. Based' on: ai, physical! iins:pect.ionm of; the: fac3iity on July 18.,• 19779.,,, the: design. and; operait:i on of the., d`.i:sposal? s1te are: cons:iide.,re.di to be ins.ubstan.t.I as c.ompl�i ance w:ith; the: State: Miin-fmum. S:ta•nda-.rd; fdr- Soa:i.4-Mi-ste Handling an.di Dis.pos:aT, except that-. they. viiol ate Sectiion. 176561 a.nd Sect.i:orr, 1765.7 ('Ent.ry Siigns.)I.. The condiitiions, of th,iis, permiit. es:taib�Tiish a, t:1 e sehedblie. fo,r: compliance with, these se.c.tions:., 5. Thi:s; permit: iis; consAstent: w:i th, the Orange County,,. Solid Wamste., Management: Van. . and: the, State: M:iiniimum; Standards; for, Soaiid Waste HandJ'Ag; and Di;s.po:sal . 61., Pursuant. to- Government Code Sectton 66796:..4:5:,, the: iiss.uanice: of thds, permit its exempt- froml the p:roviis-tons. of the: Caliifo:rniia Envi ronmen,tali Quality Act of 1970;,. as: amend`edl.- CONDITIONS; I.t fs, hereby, ordered that. As.-Con Land FiiTI shawl, comply with: the fo:1 I ow-i:n:g;: Requirements 1. Thia: fac-l fty s a-11 comply, wit th, the: State Misnimum: Standards fov Soaiid Waste H'andl iingf- an.di Diisposa-i.l . 2:.. Thi's fa.c.ility s1hal'11 comp.1y with: al;1; app:l,icab,le federal, state, reg;i.on.al. and. local: requirements: and enactments. 3. Addit.tona.l tniformat-ton, conce.rniiimg the design: ands operation. of this facility must. be fur:nitshed upon request: by the: En:farcement Agency. Proh:ibi t.fons. 4. The. following actiions, are prohibited' at the facility: Solid Waste Facility Perm' As-Con Land Fill Page 3 i A. Disposal of liquid wastes, containerized or not. B. Disposal , of Group 1, Group 2,or hazardous wastes. C. Scavenging_. Specifications 5. A copy of. the State Minimum Standards for Solid Waste Handling and Disposal , and a copy of this permit and all other permits which condition the operation of the facility shall be maintained at the site. 6. A copy of the most recent inspection report resulting from an inspection of . the facility by representatives of the Enforcement .Agency must be maintained at the site. 7. The maximum elevation of the filling operation near the center of the site shall not exceed 25 feet above the intersection of the centerlines of Magnolia Street and Hamilton Avenue. The finished grade shall slope downward from the center of the* site at an approximate 3% slope to the perimeter berms , which . . . are to be maintained at existing elevations, approximately 18 feet above street grade. The existing topography of the east side of the site adjacent to Magnolia Street shall not be altered. 8. The previously used liquid waste disposal pit immediately north of the office area shall not be disturbed by the filling operation of the evaporation/percolatio►. ponds. _ The dike on the low side of the pit shall be adequately maintained to insure containment of the impounded liquids. 9. A dike, with at least 18 inches of freeboard, shall be maintained around the evaporation/percolation ponds at all times. All dikes shall be designed and contructed to insure containment of the impounded liquids. 10. Any liquid wastes removed from the evaporation/percolation ponds shall be disposed of in accordance with all federal , state, regional and local standards. 11. In accordance with Section 17704 (Leachate Control ) of the State Minimum Standards, the operator shall take adequate steps to monitor, collect, treat and properly dispose of .leachate. 12. In accordance with Section 17670 (Personnel Health and Safety) of the State Minimum Standards, .all equipment operators and laborers working in. the disposal area shall be provided with suitable hearing protection devices , dust masks, and safety goggles or face shields. 13. Due to the .close proximity of the site to existing residential areas, special operational procedures may have to be implemented to insure compliance with the following sections of the State Minimum Standards; Section 17701 (Nuisance Control ) , Section 17706 (Dust Control ) , Section 17712 (Noise Control ) ,and Section 17713 (Odor Control ) . Solid Waste Facility Perm_ As-Con Land Fill Page 4 14. No significant change in the design or operation from that described in the FINDINGS section is allowed, except for those changes which are required by the CONDITIONS section of this permit. Provisions 15. To comply with Section 1.7656 (Identification Signs) and Section 17657 (Entry Signs) of the State Minimum Standards , the operator shall place a sign at the Hamilton Avenue entrance indicating the name of the facility, the hours of operation, and either (1) the materials that will be accepted for disposal , or (2) the materials that will not be accepted for disposal . Additionally,a sign must be placed at the Magnolia Street gate indicating the name of the facility. These signs shall be placed within 30 days of the date of issuance of this permit. Monitoring 16. On July 1, of each year, a monitoring report, indicating the number of cubic yards of solid waste disposed of during the preceeding twelve month period, and the number of cubic yards of remaining disposal capacity, 'shall be submitted to the Enforcement Agency. The monitoring report shall be signed by a responsible officer or authorized representative of the operator, certifying the accuracy of the report. ML:kh c,9 3/1j;4y r� J, u CITY OF H NTINGTON 81 ED BY CITY CD INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATI LL.� HUNTINGTON BEACH CXTY BILK To Floyd G. Belsito From Steverson Project Team City Administrator By: Raymond C. Picard Fire Chief Subject Steverson Project Team Date March 6, 1979 On February 22, the Steverson Project Team including Ray Picard, Jim Palin, Gail Hutton, and Rick Grunbaum met with Mr. Carl Steverson, a major owner of the Steverson Brother's Mud Dump, and Mr. William Carlson, his attorney, to. explore short and long term solutions to the Steverson Brother's mud dump problems. BACKGROUND: As a basis for discussion, the December 11, 1978 report of the Steverson Project Team, attached hereto, was utilized and the following recommendations and conclusions were developed : 1. Fill of the Mud Dump: It is the city' s current short range objective, in regard to the mud dump, to cover all waste and oil materials. Mr. Steverson estimates at the current rate of fill, without any acceleration, the entire site will be filled in seven to eight years. Mr. Steverson indicated that the time could be much sooner if recreational use is authorized. It is presently 50 percent filled, he estimated. Members of the project team and Mr. Steverson were in agreement that concrete fill is acceptable as fill material for stabilizing the mud dump for its ultimate recreational use. The city will seek advice from Public Works engineers to investigate and verify this conclusion. Mr. Steverson agreed that if the s.u.zrf4ce dust problems on the site occurred, the area would be planted or oiled. 2. Reduction of Dust and Debris : Regarding the generation of dust and debris during the fill stage at the Steverson Brother' s Mud- Dump, it was determined that at the present time, the Magnolia entrance to the mud dump is closed and all dumping vehicles are diverted to the Hamilton Street access. 3. Bank Slippage : The problem of bank slippage is currently under correction and will be completed as soon as possible. Mr. Steverson indicated that thus far, over the last 13 months, he has paid out $200,000 for dike stabilization and drainage control on the subject site. s k March 6, 1979 Page Two 4 . Potential Future Use of Site : When the site at the Steverson Brother' s Mud Dump is totally filled in, Mr. Steverson's plans encompass termination of all dumping and ultimate development and use for possible overnight camping and trailer park, possibly a three hole golf course and tennis courts. This would necessitate a change from the current zoning which is M-lAO (light industrial, agricultural and oil) into some type of R.O.S. (recreational open space) zoning. 5. Planning and Zone Change : Mr. Palin indicated that the Planning Department will pursue planning and zoning the subject site for recreational uses including camping facilities. Mr. Steverson agreed that this could be done without any objections of the landowner. Mr. Palin suggested that the location of the site and its relation- ship to the coastal resource appeared to be a reasonable location for overnight and open space uses. He also stated that the property was located within the coastal zone and one of the policies of the Coastal Act of 1976 stated that visitor-serving facilities were encouraged to provide a greater number of people access to the coastal area. In addition, Mr. Palin noted that the property appeared to be a viable location for an overnight facility and that this use could be pursued in concert with the preparation of the Local Coastal Element . 6. Proposed Modifications to Oil Code to Avoid Inclusion of the Subject Mud Dump from the Prohibition of Section 15. 20. 0 0 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code: To avoid public uncertainty as to the applicability of the subject section to the mud dump situation, the city, as a policy decision, should determine that the mud dump site should be excluded from the definition of a sump. The code could then be modified accord- ingly. This can be done in several ways : 1) by expressly excluding the specific geographic area of the mud dump site from the sump definition or from the prohibition of Section 15. 20. 080 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code or 2) by adding to the last sentence of Section 15. 20. 080 the following provision: "15. 20. 080 Unlined sump, sump pits or skim ponds--prohibited. No person shall own, operate, have possession of, be in control of, or maintain any well site, former well site or l March 6, 1979 Page Three property on which an unlined sump or sump pit or skim pond is located. All such sumps or sump pits and skim pond shall be excavated of all foreign materials and filled with compactible earth to the level of the surrounding terrain. The provisions of this section shall not apply to portable sump tanks as required by the state division of oil and gas or the regional water pollution controls board. Further, the provision of this section shall not apply to any class 3 dump site which has previously operated under a certificate issued by the state. The existing provisions of the code are clear insofar as. the definition of sump is concerned and would not appear to need any further clarification if the above amendment provided in either 1 or 2 were enacted. 1115. 08. 310 Sump or sump pit . 'Sump or sump pit ' shall mean an earthen pit lined or unlined for the discharge of oil filled wastes. " However, for uniformity with the state, the city could adopt the definition of sump from Title XIV of the California Administrative Code, specifically Section 1760 which defines sump as follows : "An open pit or excavation serving as a receptacle for collection or storing fluids such as mud, hydrocarbons or waste water attendant to oil and gas field drilling and producing operation. " CONCLUSION: The Steverson Brother's Mud Dump Project Team were encouraged by the cooperation, interest and enthusiasm of Mr. Steverson in coping with what everyone agrees is a serious problem for the landowner and for the city. The interim ameliorative efforts to diminish many of the offensive effects of the continued existence of the mud dump and the reconciliation of the landowner to an ultimate longer term recreational open space use such as an overnight camping facility, tennis courts , three hole golf course types of uses were viewed very positively as long range steps in the right direction of solving this problem. Recreational uses would not require the estimated $5 to $10 million clean up, filling and stabilization of the mud dump site and would permit a compatible usage of the land with its neighbors, the Edison Company and a residential area to the east . The project team solicit any Council advice on this matter. CITY OF HN , INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION DEC 1 � 1918 HuvrincTON H`A`I{ CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH; J ADMIN!STR!1TRIF To Floyd G. Belsito, FronJohn ehrens, Interim Director City Administrator of . De pment Services Subject Steverson Project Team DateDece er 15, 1978 This is referencing the memo of December 11, 1978, on the above subject. There are a couple of items in the list of current issues which merit some comment and which may not be issues in fact... Item No. 4 relates to the dikes or bank around the site and indicates. that they erode onto adjacent street areas during rainy weather. In the rains of winter of 1978 portions of the bank along Hamilton did, in fact, fail and some debris did get into the right of way. This problem is well along toward resolution and I do not believe that the eroding into adjacent street areas is a chronic problem. In connection with item No. 7, we cannot flatly state that the concrete being dumped "will have to eventually be hauled away. " Such materials are, in fact, used from time to time in stabilizing efforts and may well contribute to the transforming of the 'site into a usable one. With respect to items 8 and 9 , I do not believe there is any question that the use of the site as a Class 3 dump is a legal, though nonconforming, use. The requirement for an entitlement from the city is a provision that came into being subsequent to the establishment . of this facility as a dump. It, therefore, . constitutes just another requirement with which the site does not conform but the requirement does not render the use illegal. Beyond the above, I think the report is comprehensive and does, in fact, point the . direction toward what may be the only viable solution to the mud dump problem. The fire chief should be commended for .taking the initiative in this project. JFB/vl FIrI^1 1��, h r F!riy"i G. B I.ito St^Verson Peoj^ct Tram C if`y Adm1histrntnr Ely: f n,,,inhnI C. Picard i Fire STEVFRSON PRr)JrCT T.AM fDecr:rn r i I, 1 978 As p^r ,your authorizntion in a Department he-H meeting, a St^verson f4tid !dump ProjFr:t Tenm consisting of Ray Picard, John Behrens, Jim Polin and CON Hutton, hris he^n establish-d to provir!e City .legrlership and a cntnlyst to resolve the mud r1urnp issu^s -Ind hring about n fi,.,a1 development of the situ. T h.rc currf'nt issues n!'PI I. lust proh(em emr.1n.gtinq frr rn Vhc- sit!'. to n`.fjo,!,o 1t nrens. 2. Dust ond/or dirt pro,)I�!m on o !jacent strent, cnus^d by r',,mp trucks moving in and out of the site. 3. There is surface oil, mtH nn-1 water on the site that cn1jses an odor in r0jocent housing areas vial may potentially tron birds on-! animn!s. rl. T!-)r, nr E:'lllt w'hic,l il1rrQUn^s th^ sit:" crodes onto crlj-!,[ent ore'']s hiring rctinv 5. The trucks which clump at the site are a gee^ra! nuisnnr_r• to resir!ent.s in the area. E. The producing oil operations on, thr� site souse, an Mar pro`flem. 7. The concrete being riljmpnd on the site may hinder final development, as it Will hnve to ccventun!ly b- hqul�-t away. 8. Tl;ere is a qunstion os to the .lepnliiy of the nor,-cnnfar!ning tire. 9. Thy- site is being kise-1 as * clo:,.s 3 6im? N•iithout City nntitlf-ment. 10. Th^re is n qunstion of an int^rprr'tntiorl as to 1"hethnr tll r!a is a legs! vinlatinn of the Monicipol Co le Section pertnining Io sumps. 11. The site constitutFs a visual hliCtItcd area. Vlithout juelging thA Issves as to ti-v^ir dcgrep of cc-curacy or ohj-ctivity, tale Committee is requt-sting rnithorizntion to proceed on a course of action to nevtre lize all of the issues and brine about a final site development :solution. next png,, .pinnso . . . . . . . I H. Floyd r;. F3elsito, (2) DecFmker 11, 1978 The project team has. set a short range objective to neutralize the site issues as follows: I. To cover all vfaste and oil materials. 2. To control Est and debris pro`)lerns. 3. T� eliminate further clumping (after Item I is complete). 4. To eliminate bank slippage problems. 5.. To modify the code on sumps (clear definition). . b. To secure thA site in a dormant state. If t�tese neutralization ohjrctivns are sntisfactary. the project tealn vAll develop and imp!(-m-nt an o')jec:tive program based on time, quality rind quantity. The long term Objectives vrould .be as follows 1. Institute a program to determine ulti-mate larxl use and method o.f achieving some (presently planning reserve). . 2. Implement tho plan to achieve objective Item 1. The team would use the following developmental strategy: I. Ke?p the Administration. and the Council informed through periodic administrative reports, so a political cooperative effort can be maintained. 2.. The project team would join in a cooperative effort urith the o,.vner to achieve; o. Neutralizat',on of the site issues. h, Cooperative implementation of a plan to achieve ultimate .land use. 3. C oncurn-ritly follo•Pr a!ternntive lega! opprocicl-,es in core thn cooperative effort fails. Thn project team .solicits any Council advice on this matter, e R. Picard .1. F3ehrens J. Palin �. Hutton File Pr STATE OF CALIFORNIA—RESOURCES AGENt - EDMUND F.&OW� 1R., Governor CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD- ' SANTA ANA REGION ' 6833 INDIANA AVENUE, SUITE 1 �. RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92506 PHONE: (714) 684.9330 N M M sfvk December 18, 1978 Mr. Carl R. Steverson, President Steverson Brothers P. 0. Box 335 . Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mr. Steverson: We have not received the information requested in our November 22, 1978, letter. This includes an evaluation of your disposal site's present stormwater containment capabilities and a definite plan for preventing discharges of wastes from the site during the current rainy season. The report should be submitted by December 28, 1978. If there are any questions, please contact this office. Sincerely, Original Signed By JAMES W. ANDERSON Executive Officer cc:*"'City of Huntington Beach BCP/SDH/cl Ap He CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION n MUNTINGTON BEACH •1/ I C,4 2- To Floyd.G. Belsito From Steverson Project Team City Administrator By: Raymond C. Pic Fire Chief Subject STEVERSON PROJECT TEAM Date December I I, 1978 As per your authorization in a Department head meeting, a Steverson Mud Dump Project Team consisting of Ray Picard, John Behrens, Jim Palih and Gail Hutton; has been established to provide City leadership and a:catalyst to "resolve the mud dump issues and bring about final development of the site. The current issues are: I. Dust problem emanating from the site to adjacent areas. I Dust and/or dirt problem on adjacent street; caused by dump trucks moving in and out of the site. 3. There is surface oil, mud and water on the site that causes an odor in adjacent housing areas and may potentially trap birds and dnimals. 4. The dikes or bank which surrounds the site erodes onto adjacent street areas during rainy weather. S. The trucks which dump at the site are a general nuisance to residents. in the area: 6. The producing oil operations on the site cause an odor- problem. 7. The concrete being dumped on the site may hinder final development, as it Will have to eventually be hauled away. 8. There is a question as to the legality of the non-conforming use. 9. The site is being used as a class 3 dump without City entitlement. 10: There is a question of an interpretation as to whether there is a legal violation of the Municipal Code Section pertaining to sumps. 11, The site constitutes a visual blighted area. Without judging the issues as to their degree of accuracy or objectivity, the Committee is requesting authorization to proceed on a course of action to neutralize all of the issues and bring about a final site development solution* next page, please . : . . . . . v 4 Floyd G. Belsito,: (2). t..":.: December 11, 1978 The project team has set a short range objective to neutralize the site issues as follows: 1. To cover all waste and oil materials. 2. To control dust and debris problems. 3. To eliminate further dumping (after Item I is complete). 4. To eliminate bank slippage problems. 5. To modify the code on sumps (clear definition). 6. To secure the site in a dormant state. If these neutralization objectives are satisfactory, the project team will develop and implement an objective program based on time, quality and quantity. The long term objectives would be as follows: I. Institute a program to determine ultimate land use and method of achieving same (presently planning reserve). 2. Implement the plan to achieve objective Item I. The team would use the following developmental strategy: .I. Keep the Administration and the Council informed through periodic administrative reports, so a political cooperative effort can be maintained. 2. The project team would join in a cooperative effort with the owner to achieve; a. Neutralization of the site issues. b. Cooperative implementation of a plan to achieve ultimate land use. 3. Concurrently follow alternative legal approaches in case the cooperative effort falls. The project team solicits any Council advice on this matter. RCP:cw cc: R. Picard J. Behrens J. Palin G. Hutton File 2- CITY ( HUNTINGTON BEACH 7_1�/,C1 �., INTER-DEPARTMENT COMM UNICATION ON HUNTINGTON BEACH To Floyd Belsito, From John Vogelsang, Assist. Director City Administrator Building & Community Development Subject Steverson Brother' s Property Date November 30 , 1978 To update you on the activities at the subject property, I talked to Mr. Lawmaster who is the soils engineer on this project and his comments were as follows: (1) Mr. Carl Brown, Civil Engineer, is presently preparing a topographic map of the area so that the containment capabilities of the area can be determined. (2) Mr. Lawmaster does not think that the area can contain the water from a 100 year, 24 hour storm so he is planning to install a clarifier so that clear water can be discharged to the County Sanitation District Sewer. (3) The reason that grading has temporarily stopped is that they are waiting .for a piece of equipment to compact the slope. . I also contacted Mr. Anderson. of 'the California Regional Water Quality Control Board and - they have received nothing .since the meeting of October 27 , 1978. JBV/ecd I •kTAIE. Of CALIIORNIA—RESOURCES AGENC EUMUNU G. DROWN lR• Go.*-- CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD- SANTA ANA REGION 6033 INDIANA AVENUE, SUITE 1 ` a,'� RIVERSIDE, CALIrORNIA M06 PHONES (714) 604-5330 V C,� November 22, 1978 Mr. Carl R., Steverson, President ( Steverson Brothers P. 0. Box 335 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Huntington Beach; CA 92648 ADMIilISTfi:nTl'rE OfF!C' Dear Mr. Steverson: This will confirm the October 27, 1978, meeting between you and members of my staff. At that time we indicated the Board's dissatisfaction with the continued delay in providing facilities at the site to handle a 100-year, 24-hour storm. Since. the facilities were not available, we asked as an interim measure that the following be submitted by December 7; 1978: 1 . Evaluation of the site's present storm water containment capabilities. 2. Written statement from the. County Sanitation District's of Orange County with regard to your ability to discharge waste water from your site to the sewer. 3. Your alternative action should the District's not allow discharge to their facilities. In addition we expect the plans and calculations for the containment of a 100-year, 24-hour storm prior to January 1 , 1979, as proposed by your consultants, Civil Engineers, Inc. , in their letter dated October 20, 1978.- A completion date for any required improvements must also be submitted at that time. As we indicated at the meeting, in the event of any further discharges of waste from your property, the Attorney General will be asked to take Judicial enforcement steps including monetary penalties of up to $10,000 per day. Sincerely, Original S';Jl ;u 4 JAMES W. ANDERSON Executive Officer cc: ✓City of Huntington Beach BCP/cl / - �- STATE,OF CALIFORNIA—RESOURCES AGENCY ' ✓ EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Governor CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD- �. SANTA' ANA REGION -� 6833 INDIANA AVENUE, SUITE 1 RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92306 PHONES (714) 684-9330 November 22, 1978 Mr. Carl R. Steverson, President Steverson Brothers P. 0. Box 335 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mr. Steverson: This will confirm the October 27, 1978, meeting between you and members of my staff. At that time we indicated the Board's dissatisfaction with the continued delay in providing facilities at the site to handle a 100-year, 24-haur storm. Since the facilities were not available, we asked as an interim measure that the following be submitted by December 7, 1978: 1. Evaluation of the site's present storm water containment capabilities. 2. Written statement from the County Sanitation District's of Orange County with regard to your ability to discharge waste water from your site to the sewer. 3. Your alternative action should the District's not allow -discharge to their facilities. In addition we expect the plans and calculations for the containment of a 100-year, 24-hour storm prior to January 1 , 1979, as proposed by your consultants, Civil Engineers, Inc. , in their letter dated October 26, 1978. A completion date for any required improvements must also be submitted at that time. As we indicated at the meeting, in the event of any further discharges of waste from your property, the Attorney'General will be asked to take judicial enforcement steps including monetary penalties of up to $10,000 per day.. Sincerely, 0rigina1 signed By JAMES W. ANDERSON Executive Officer cc: ✓City of Huntington Beach BCP/cl 371eveo5aN .Gf vb a CITY OF HUNTINIGTON BEACH �; INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION ' 1�0 HUNTINGTON BEACH ry , To Honorable Mayor & .Council From John ens, Director Build Community Developmen' Subject Steverson Mud Dump Date Novemb 20 , 1978 It appears at this time that the City will be initiating legal action against the subject property. It is my understanding that the City will allege that the mud dump .is a "sump" as contemplated by the Oil Code and therefore, as such, must be removed. As an official of the City and as the department director formerly charged with the administration of the Oil Code, I find myself in an increasingly uncomfortable. position. This arises from my conviction that the mud dump is 'not violative of the Oil Code provisions relating to sumps" . The application of the Oil Code definition of "sump" in so literal a fashion could also include every diked or walled tank enclosure and other features. Such an interpretation, .in my .judgement, is clearly beyond the intent of the Oil .Code and the Oil Committee which drafted it. It is highly improbable that I, as the city official formerly charged with the administration of the Oil Code, would not be involved as a witness in the litigation. Should I become involved, my testimony will be what I believe . to be the truth. Therefore such testimony would not support an allegation that the mud dump is a sump as contem- plated by the Oil Code. This. matter has previously been discussed with the City Administrator and the City Attorney. We all agree that my position should also .be made known to the Council before the fact. JFB/ecd CITY OF HUNTINGTON. BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION AL HUNTINGTON BEACH To HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS From CITY ATTORNEY OF THE CITY COUNCIL Subject FOURTH PROGRESS REPORT - Date November 17 , 1978 STEVERSON MUD DUMP The City Attorney ' s office has not been successful to date in obtaining a signature of a complaining witness to .file a criminal complaint against the Steverson Bros . operation for maintaining a sump on the subject property. Contact has been made with the Building Department, the Fire Department, and even the Planning Department; however, there is reluctance on the part of personnel to sign. Further, contact has been made with two private citi- zens , Mrs . Buckland and Mr. Simpson. They have not consented to sign the complaint, apparently because they feel it is an ob- vious situation which .can be inspected and observed by City per- sonnel, and enforcement is the City ' s responsibility . A complaint has been prepared and is awaiting a signature, which, despite diligent efforts by this office, we have been unable to obtain to date. For further information of the City Council , we are attaching a letter to Mr. Steverson from the City Administrator requesting closure of the entrances on Magnolia Street and use of Hamilton Avenue for ingress and egress . Mr. Steverson,. through his attor- ney, Mr. Carlson, has agreed to this request in the attached correspondence. To update the City Council on the current status of action taken by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, a letter was written to the property owners requesting further compliance with the cease and desist order 78-107, and a meeting was scheduled for October 27, 1978. Attached is a communication from the CRWQCB and a communication from Mr. Vogelsang, Assistant Building Director, indicating the outcome of that meeting. This constitutes our report ," and we will be pleased to respond to any questions of City Council. Respectf ly ubmitt' J N 0' ONNOR e.puty ity Attorney JOC:ps APPROVED: Attachments YLLIA. S .. AMS RY Assisxant City Attorney y H CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH b. INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION R HUNTINGTON BEACH To Floyd G. Belsito, From John .B. Vogelsang, 1 City Administrator Assistant .Director, Building Subject Steverson Property Date October 27 , 1978. . I contacted Mr., James Anderson of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board for the results of the 1-: 30 p.m. meeting with Mr. .Steverson and they are as follows: .• (a) Mr. Steverson will submit plans and calcs showing how the facility will handle the water from a 100-year, 24-hour storm as soon as possible. (b) Mr. Steverson will attempt to obtain a permanent connection to the sanitation district's line to discharge any excessive rain water. (c) The C.R.W.Q.C.B. will not refer the matter to the Attorney General at this time. However, if there is any spillage off the property, it , will be referred with a request for a $6,000 per day penalty. JBV/vl ,t:JAJE OF CAIIIORNIA.-.RESOUIICES AGENCY ",. 'CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALH Y CONIROL BOARD- SANTA ANA REGION 6933 INDIANA AVENUE, SUITE I RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92506 PHONEj (714) 684.9330 October 19, 1978 Mr. Carl R.. Steverson, President Steverson Bros. P. 0. Box 335 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mr. Steverson: We have reviewed your September 22, 19789 letter and find that it does not adequately comply with Cease and Desist Order No. 78-107. Full compliance with the, order was due by June 1 1978. - This includes facilities to contain storm water from up to a 100-year, 24-hour storm. We appreciate the work that has been done; however, we see no reason why plans and calculations for storm water cohtainment, along with a completion date cannot be submitted at this time. . .The above information must be submitted on October 27 , 1978, at 1 :30 p.m. in. a meeting in our off-ice. If YOU are Unable to SLI.Pply the information, you should explain why this matter should not be referred to the Attorney General for judicial enforcement. Sincerely, Original Signcd By I. JAMES W. ANDERSON Executive Officer -cc:. &<ity of Huntington Beach BCP/SDH/cl Q OC-F 20 n ..w City of Huntington Beach 1 P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 OFI7ICE OF THE CITY ADhAINISTRATOR October 30 , 1978 Mr . Carl Steverson P. O. Box 335 Huntington Beach, California .92648 Dear Mr. Steverson: In an effort to further alleviate the concerns of the resi- dents adjacent to your property at Magnolia Street and Hamilton Avenue , we would like. y.ou to give consideration to the possibility of closing the Magnolia .Street drive entrances serving the dump site.. Along with the dust problem effecting the residences on the east side of Magnolia Street, there is the concern for traffic safety . The traffic count on Magnolia Street is 700-0. vehicles per day while the count on Hamilton Avenue is 3500 vehicles per day . In addition an active bike. trail exists along your Magnolia _ Street frontage while a substantially less active bike trail exists along your Hamilton Avenue frontage. Hopefully the suggested closure would not have an adverse effect on your operations while a.t the same time take advantage of. the benefits to be gained . We would appreciate hearing from you after you have had an opportunity to review our suggestion. Very truly yours , 014, Floyd G Belsito City A ministrator FGB:MZ : jy I ^• _ LAW OrrICES . C. WILLIAM CARLSON, JR. 2130 MAIN STREET AREA CODE 71•1 SUITE 140 TELEPHONE 960-2411 HUNTINGTON BEACH-. CALIFORNIA 92648 November 8 , 1978 Mr . John O ' Connor City - Attorney ' s Office Post Office Box 190 Huntington Beach , CA. 92648 Re : Steverson Bros . Dumpsite Dear John : Carl . Steverson received the enclosed letter from Mr . Belsito . We have advised the operator at the dumpsite to close the .Magnolia Street entrance in accordance with his request . Would you please advise Mr . Belsito of the action taken by my clients in this . regard . . Very truly yours , C . WILLIAM CARLSO JR . CWC : nt Enclosure cc : Steverson Bros . .�``,•� NU N TI GT'�. v NOV 9 1978 = . TO RN November 20 , 1978 TO: Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers FROM: City Attorney SUBJECT: Steverson Mud Dump This office has investigated the possibility of, and taken preliminary steps to initiate a violation of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code in the continuation of the so-called "Steverson Mud Dump. " it is the consensus of city department heads with cognizance over the problem that no violation of the code presently exists. On the contrary, the reports we . receive indicate that the property owner is cooperative in accepting and acting . upon suggestions emanating from staff in regard to alleviation of the extent of problems at the site . You are in receipt of a letter t.o this effect from the Director of Building and Com- munity Development . The Fire Chief., Ray Picard, concurs in the content of this letter. Previously forwarded .to Council. When it became apparent that . staff support would not be forth- coming, we proselyted within the community to attempt to ascertain if any interested and aggrieved citizens would be- come. a complaining witness . Even the most vocal of those persons opposed to the continued maintenance of the dump declined to execute , under oath, a complaint against the owner of the premises. The Council itself, when faced with .this problem at the recent public hearing, declined to" address the problem of nuisance at the site and referred resolution of the problem to _ this office . Evaluation of our legal posture when coupled with staff recom- mendations against criminal action, make it apparent that any attempt- to exercise the prosecutorial discretion in any manner except to not prosecute , would be a frivolous waste. of tax- payer' s .funds. Accordingly, the decision has been made to not take any action at this time in regard to the mud dump . If it is the sense of the Council that legal action, civil, as 1 Memo -to Mayor and Councilmembers November 20 , 1978 Re : Steverson Mud Dump Page 2 opposed to criminal , in nature , be taken to alleviate the alleged problems at the mud dump , then it will be necessary for the Council to direct the City Attorney to proceed on a public nuisance theory. All nuisances are defined in this jurisdiction in the Cali- fornia Civil Code §§3480 and 3481 as follows : §3480 : "Public Nuisance . "A public nuisance is one which affects at the same time an entire community or neighborhood . - or any considerable number of- persons, although the extent of the annoyance or damage inflicted upon individuals may be unequal. " §3481 : "Private Nuisance . PRIVATE NUISANCE. Every nuisance not included in the definition of the last section is private . " A problem . such as we are dealing with does not lend itself to either public or private abatement : Legal action is necessary if .a problem actually exists and if correction is, in fact , desired. . t GAIL HUTTON City Attorney GH:bc WILLIAM AMSBAR Assistant City At r ey LAJJ0 CITY OF Hum,riNGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH - - To Honorable Mayor and City Council From Raymond C. Picar Fire Department Subject STEVERSON'S MUD DUMP Date November 20, 1978 There has been. action at various Administrative levels pertaining. to Oil Code Violations at the Steverson's mud dump. It is my opinion the operators of the dump are making a concerted effort to correct and alleviate any community aggrevation that may be caused by the existence of past or current operations. On the issue of a sump violation, I cannot testify in good conscious that the dump is a sump. and in violation .of the intent of City codes.. RCP:cw LAW OFFICES OF C. WILLIAM CARLSON. JR. _ 2130 MAIN STREET AREA CODE 714 SUITE 140 TELEPHONE 950-2411 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CALIFORNIA 92G48 November 8, 1978 ASCOM Mr. Salvatore P u g I i e s e 21641 Magnolia Street Huntington Beach ; CA. 92646 Dear Mr. Pugliese : Steverson Bros . has been requested by the City of Huntington Beach to close the Magnolia Street entrance serving the dumpsite . It has been determined by the corporation that it is in the best interest to cooperate with the City in this regard . Therefore , would you please take the necessary action to close the Magnolia Street entrance and use the Hamilton Avenue entrance to the dump- site . In view of the past problems with the City of. Huntington Beach , my clients would appreciate your taking care of this as soon as possible . Ver truly yours , W C. WILLIAM CARLSON , JR. CWC:nt cc : Steverson Bros . STATE OF CALIIORNIA--RESOURCES AGENCY EDMU D G. BROWN JR., Governor D.- CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD- - SANTA ANA REGION 6833.INDIANA AVENUE, SUITE 1 RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92506 PHONE, (714) 684-9330 October 19, 1978 Mr. Carl R. Steverson, President Steverson Bros. P. 0. Box 335 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mr. Steverson: We have reviewed your September 22, 1978, letter and find that it does not adequately comply with Cease and Desist Order No. 78-107. Full compliance with the- order was due by June 1 , 1978. This includes facilities to contain storm water from up to a 100-year, 24-hour storm. We appreciate the work that has been done; however, we see no reason why plans and calculations for storm water containment along with a completion date-cannot be submitted at this time. The above information must be submitted on October 27 , 1978, at 1 :30 p.m. in a meeting in our office. If you are unable to supply the .information, you should explain why this matter should not be referred to the Attorney General for judicial enforcement.. Sincerely,. Original Signed By JAMES W. ANDERSON Executive. Officer cc: rCity of Huntington Beach BCP/SDH/cl m CALIF REGIONA! ViA i_3 �` % °"' ��US.Pu1'1 Fj E I OUALI3Y CONTROL BOARD � ��;�_ �U. ' . OCT 19'78 ��•�a 6833 INDIANA AVE STE 1 6i r ' RIVERSIDE, CA 92506 cqL F P67o1 � CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH C P 0 BOX 190 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 L=� U U f UU 7 tF11 ' CITY OIF HUN'i'1@sIGYOIei BEACH Ah GW� INTER-DEPARTMENT CQM UNICATION u CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEA 101 ""NTINGTOW BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE To Gail Hutton, From John Pam._+ 01rens, Director City Attorney (Y" Build' & Community Development Subject Steverson Dumps Date August 8 , 1978 NThis morning I hhe opportunity to read the material which you prepared . and included in the packet for last night's council meeting on the above subject. As you know, I have consistently felt that, in my judgement, there are not sufficient grounds to sustain a finding that a_ public nuisance exists with the Steverson mud dump. This feeling is strengthened as I read the memorandum: One of the bases for a finding of a public nuisance relates to "the potential danger of seepage and collapse of the diking." The testimony . of the engineers familiar with the problem will be that there is no danger of collapse in the diking system. While this may have been true for a short period of time last spring, the potential danger has, for some months, been removed. This would be my testimony and, I believe, that of the city engineer and the soils engineering firm retained to correct the problem. Secondly I believe the question of accumulation of mud and debris on city streets has been overstated. I saw no .excessive amount of mud and debris on the adjacent streets which would impede traffic, certainly no; more than is found occasionally .from a variety of construction sites or industrial operations . With respect to seepage, the amount of water flowing across Hamilton was no more than .can be found each morning this time of year on the Pacific .Coast Highway or on Main Street adjacent to the civic center when the sprinkler systems are. operating. J /vl l/` : Floyd G. Belsito, City Administrator i REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Submitted by CITY ATTORNEY Department LEGAL Date Prepared July 31 , 01978 Backup Material Attached Xa Yes No Subject Steverson Dump City Administrator's Comments } Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions: Council requested the City Attorney to delineate the procedural steps following the public hearing on the Steverson Dump . Attached herewith are : 1. Copy of the original report for the City Attorney ' s office 2 . Procedural alternatives 3 . Proposed findings should Council determine the site or activity is a public nuisance It is the Council which makes an independent judgment on whether or not the activity constitutes a public nuisance , and the proposed findings do not represent a policy decision by the staff that a public nuisance exists . The function of the City Attorney and staff is to enforce Council directive , and the proposed findings were prepared at the request of Council . GAIL HUTTON City Attorney Plo 3178 , Y TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: GAIL HUTTON, CITY ATTORNEY DATE: JULY 17 , 1978 SUBJECT : REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL ON STEVERSON "MUD DUMP" At the conclusion of the recent public hearing on the "mud dump" , the City Council requested the City Attorney to prepare a report on the legal alternatives available to the City Council in this matter, and to present proposed Findings of Fact based on the testimony and evidence before the City Council . The legal alternatives available to the City Council will depend on whether or not the operations upon or existence of the . Steverson site constitute a public nuisance . This is the threshold question which must be addressed and be determined by the City Council. If the operations are determined not to be a public nuisance, the City would have no legal right to terminate their operations . If the Council makes the deter- mination that the operations do, in fact , constitute a public nuisance, then the City may take appropriate action to abate that nuisance , either by ordering 'a cessation of operations , by a removal and cleanup of the area, or whatever is necessary . Some of the Council members seem to be under the impression that activity- and operations of the facility could be curtailed or prohibited by an ordinance without declaring the activity or site a public nuisance . Enactment of an ordinance to prohibit dumping would be subject to legal challenge on the basis that it is not of uniform application, but applies only to one indi- vidual in a discriminatory manner. The determination of whether or not a public nuisance exists must be made by the City Council based on their observa- tions, knowledge, testimony and evidence presented at the public hearing. The criteria to determine whether or not a public nuisance exists was set forth in a memorandum distributed to the City Council prior to the hearing. To reiterate these criteria, in order to make a determination that a public nuisance exists , the City Council must find: (A) That the use of the property or activity thereon affects : (1) an entire community, or (2) a neighborhood, or ( 3) a considerable number of persons . 1 . 4 (B) That the present use or activity on the property is : (1 ) injurious to health, or ( 2) offensive to the senses, or ( 3) an obstruction to free use of property and interferes with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property . If t-he Council determines that the criteria have not been met , then there is no legal basis to declare the use of the land and activity a public nuisance , and the finding that the use or activity does not constitute a _public nuisance should be made . On the other hand, if the Council finds that one or more of the criteria in both (A ) and (B) are met , then they may determine the use of the site or activity constitutes a public nuisance . Council has requested proposed Findings of Fact for deter- mination of a public nuisance and an analysis and evaluation of the evidence, the testimony and official records would permit the following finding. Does the use of the land or activity affect an entire com- munity, a neighborhood, or a considerable number of persons? While there were a relatively small number of persons who appeared and .addressed the City Council, the Council could conclude that their testimony is representative of a nuisance that affects a considerable number of persons , or the neighbor- hood in the area of the site . Some of the factors the Council could take into consideration are the accumulation of mud and debris on City streets , which may affect a considerable number of motorists driving these streets; the odors which allegedly permeate throughout the neighborhood; and the potential danger of seepage and collapse of the diking which may affect a con- siderable number of persons residing in the vicinity . In addition to the foregoing, the Council must also find that the use of the property or activity thereon constitutes at least one of the following: (1) Injurious to health . There was no direct. testi- mony that breathing the air containing the odors was actually injurious to health, and if the Council were to determine the existence of a nuisance on this criteria, the only evidence upon which it could be based would. be that the existence of the facility with earthen dikes and the. seepage which had occurred several months ago , during the rainy season, could result in the failure of the diking and inundation of the public streets or adjoining homes , which may cause injuries . 2 . r (2) Offensive to the senses . There was testimony to the effect that the use of the property created undesirable odors in the vicinity, and also dust . ( 3) Obstruction of the free use of property . While there was no direct testimony as to an obstruction of the free use of property, this could be inferred from testimony that obnoxious odors interfered with the enjoyment of life and property "of those residing in the neighborhood. There was also testimony that dust emanating from the area created an interference to persons residing in the area. Again, we emphasize whether or not the activity constitutes a public nuisance , is for the City Council to determine , and if at least one of the criteria in either (A) and (B) are found not to be present , it cannot be declared a public nuisance , and no further action taken by Council over the site or activity . If the Council determines that the criteria have been met , then they may determine a public nuisance exists and make appropriate findings.. If Council determines that a public nuisance does in fact exist , appropriate action may be taken to abate the nuisance . This could take the form of a court action seeking an injunction for abatement ; or it could take the form of conditions and restrictions imposed by the City on the operator of the facility which would bring about an abatement , including a prohibition against any further dumping or disposal on the site , and in addition thereto rehabilitation of the site either by removal or chemical treatment of the waste materials . In view of the expressed cooperative attitude of the pro- prietors of the site , if Council should find this activity or use of property to be a public nuisance , we would suggest an order of abatement , and allow staff to work with the owners to alle- viate the situation, rather than immediately proceeding to court for an injunction. Respectfully submitted, GAIL HUTTON City Attorney Prepared by : s` �JOHN 0 Oi1NOR Deputy City Attorney GH:JOC :ps 3. • FOBCITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To CITY COUNCIL From CITY ATTORNEY Subject STEVERSON MUD DUMP Date July 28 , 1978 This memorandum will briefly outline the procedural aspects of the culmination of the hearing on the Steverson Mud Dump . A. If the City Council determines that the site or the activity conducted. thereon does not constitute a public nuisance, then no abatement action may legally be taken by the City Council . B. If City Council determines that the site or activity thereon constitutes a public nuisance, then the Council should adopt appropriate findings (we have attached hereto some tentative or proposed findings which the City Council may consider adopting if, in fact , they determine that it is a public nuis- ance) . C . If the site or the activity thereon is determined to be a pub- lic nuisance, then Council may make an appropriate order for abatement which may include one or more of the following: 1 . No further deposits of rotary mud or other residues from oil operations , 2 . A prohibition of further dumping or deposits of material of any type on the site , and/or 3 . Prohibition against all further dumping, and an order that the nuisance be eliminated and the site be rehabilitated to its original state to eliminate the nuisance . If the Council requires rehabilitation of the site , then we would sug- gest that a reasonable period of time be given to the property owners to comply with this abatement requirement . We would suggest the matter be referred back to staff with a directive to attempt to work out an abatement schedule and. appropriate methods of abatement with the City staff, and report back to the City Council in a reasonable period of time , i .e . 60 .days . Again we emphasize whether or not this site or activities conducted thereon is a public nuisance is a fact determination by the City Council, and if found to be a public nuisance , that appropriate abatement proce- dures be ordered by the Council. Enactment of an ordinance directed against that specific activity, and pertaining only to a limited geo- graphical area of the city is of questionable legal validi GAIL HUTTON, City Attorney JO O 'CONNOR GH:JOC :jl Deputy City Attorney Attachments PROPOSED FINDINGS OF PUBLIC NUISANCE The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach hereby determines the conditions on the property known as the "Steverson Mud Dump" constitute a public nuisance . The Council finds : (a): During the seasonal rains an: ear..then embankment surrounding the site caused seepage and deposit of mud and debris on the public street of the City, impeding traffic . (b) Accumulation of liquids during the seasonal rains caused pressures on the dike walls , creating an unsafe condi- tion and danger to persons residing in the neighborhood. (c ) The site emits pungent obnoxious odors over a wide area causing annoyance to the senses of persons residing in the vicinity. (d) The site creates dust problems to residents in the neighborhood. (e) The site poses a danger to children and is inade- quately protected by fencing. 'PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P.) This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Proof of Publication of County of Orange I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eigh- teen years, and not a party to or interested in the above-entitled matter. 1 am the principal clerk of the printer of the HUNTINGTON BEACH NEWS, a Published Huntington Beach News, June . newspaper of general circulation, printed and pub- °29, 1978. lished at 208 Main Street in the City of,Hunting- . NOTICE OF PUBLIC , � ton Beach County of Orange, and which newspaper HEARING STEVERSON 6ROS. MUD DUMB has been adjudicated a newspaper of general circu- Notice is hereby given that a pub- lation b the Superior Court of the Count of Or- fic hearing wiil"'be held by thcv City y p y Council of the ,City of Huntirgton Beach, at an adjourned meeting ange, State Of California, under the date Of August thereof, to be held in' the Council 27th, 1937, Case Number A-5931; that the notice, Chamber-of-the Civic.Center, ,Hunt- ington Beach,•at the hour of 7:30- of whlich the annexed is a printed co set in t e P.M: or as soon thereafter as pos-' py ( yp 5ible„ q�uesday, the.11th of July, not smaller than nonpareil), has been published .in i978, _or the purpose of 'receiving' evidence that a public nuisance ex- each regular and entire issue of said news paper fists_at'the Steverson Bros. Mud Dump p P Iecated at the southwest cornw -of and not in any,supplement thereof on the following magnolia Street and Hamilton Ave* nue, and for the possible direction dat@$, to_Wit: by;the City Council to. the City At- torney to take-civil action to abate II such public nuisance under Section { 731 of th California 'Code of Civic . . . . . . . . .J,urip. .29 y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Procedure.All persons who can testify as to all in the year 19 78 the,facts which constitute a public nuisance are. invited to .attend ,said hearing. Further information may:be obtained Prom the Office of the City I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that Cle'k, :2000. Main',st,, .Huntington ,Ilea' "CA. (714).,53fi-5225. the foregoing is true and correct. Dated:,;_21 78. ° t City of.Huritington-Beach }.,... .,; By. Alicia M. Wehtworth Elated at Huntington Beach, California, this.3 Q h. day of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Jun?., 1978. . . . .. Signature PROOF OF PUBLICATION City of Huntington Beach County of ®range State of California Jf fidavitof Publication of GEORGE FARQUHAR Publisher Huntington Beach News Filed Clerk By Deputy Clerk tj- Publish - 6/W/78 Black Box ITT JoS A 1,e- y90 `\NOTICE OF PUBLIC \SHEARING JCJ STEVERSON BROS. MUD DUMP Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, at an adjourned meeting thereof to be held in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible, onZA the *%of July, 1978, for the purpose of receiving evidence that a public nuisance exists at the Steverson Bros. Mud Dump located at the southwest corner of Magnolia Street and Hamilton Avenue, and for the possible direction by the City Council to the City Attorney to take civil action to abate such public nuisance under Section 731 of the California Code of Civic Procedure. All persons who can testify as to the facts which constitute a public nuisance are invited to attend said hearing. Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main St'. , Huntington Beach, CA. (714) 536-5226. Dated: 6/21/78 City of Huntington Beach By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk r i- Publish - 6 /78 Black Box -PaS4A le- NOTICE OF PUBLIC Pa HEARING STEVERSON BROS. MUD DUMP Notice is hereby. given that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, at "an adjourned meeting thereof to be held in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of N i 7:30 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible, on� , the &bl"of July, 1978, for the purpose of receiving evidence that a public nuisance exists at the Steverson Bros. Mud Dump located at the southwest corner of Magnolia Street and Hamilton Avenue, and for the possible direction by the City Council to the City Attorney to take civil action to abate such public nuisance under Section 731 of the California Code of Civic Procedure. All persons who can testify as to the facts which constitute a public nuisance are invited to- attend said hearing. Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Cleric, 2000 Main St., Huntington Beach, CA. (714) 536-5226. Dated: 6/21/78 City of Huntington Beach By: Alicia M. WentWorth City Clerk 41 _ A1iciMa_ Wentworth ,�__._ To City Clerk Date 6/6/78 r: STEVERSON MUD DUMP PUBLIC HEARING. ' Please have the necessary notices prepared . 1= regarding . the public hearing on the mud dump :Nand coordinate-- with the City Attorney as to - • nt proper wording . Also , determine whether FAthe Building and Public Works Departments have any input . 10� _ PLEASE REPLY TO Signed City Admi hi st-rator=,t 6/8/78 't Too Si11 Hart9p John Behrens The public hearing on this is.scheduled for 7/10/RRR 78 i< If you have any material that should be in the Council packet, please .submit it to Jeri Chennele by 7/3/78. have given the old legal from 1971 to Gail u„t-t-nn t-o „_rlate it i f necessary The last time I I think there were -certain people who testified,; wi 1 1 nni-i ceG have to be sent out to nearby- people? I don't think we did it by 300' require- f Date m _nt '1 a t time If Signed '- so Will you get m the AP s f-or,us Rodif�rm SEND PARTS 1 AND 3 WITH CARBONS INTACT. 4S 465 PART 3 WILL BE RETURNED WITH REPLY. f ,i`rom the desk of: CONNIE BROCKWAY City .Clerk's office 536-5226 c 7G /Iv v f shy /to-Av"VI.-Al 0le 13 /� �vsorr P , :a = idavit 00 Pt cation ` t� +;4if California County of Orange . ss City of Huntington Beach 111 George Farquhar, being duly sworn on oath, says: That he is a 'NOTICE OF PUBLIC } citizen of the United States, over the age of twenty-one years. That he is the printer and publisher of the Huntington Beach HEADING News, a weekly newspaper of general circulation printed and pub- .I lished in Huntington Beach, California and circulated in the said X County of Orange and elsewhere and published for the dissemination ; . of local and other news of a general character, and has a bona fide NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing.,• subscription list of paying subscribers, and said paper has been established, printed and published in the State of California, and will be held by the City Council of the City of Hunt- County of Orange, for at least one year next before the publication ington Beach, at an adjourned meeting thereof to of the first insertion of this notice; and the said newspaper is not devoted to the interest ofi or published for the entertainment of any. to be held at particular class, profession, trade, calling, race or denomination, or a and-+{agfpn in Huntington Beach, at-the hour of ; any number thereof. The Huntington Beach News was adjudicated a legal newspaper 7:30 P.M. or .as soon thereafter as possible, on of general circulation by Judge G. K. Scovel in the Superior Court Monday, the 22ffW day of Maw-419T1''. for the pur- of Orange County,.California August 27th, 1937 by order No. A-5931. se of receiving evidence that a :pUbliC nuisancpo <`• < t s That the NOTICE .OF PUBLIC HEAH1N4 exists at the mud.dump located aY��& Southwest".. corner of Magnolia Street and Hamilton Avenue,:and ; for the possible direction by the City Council to'thq. of which the annexed is a printed copy, was published in said news- City Attorney to take civil action tb abate.such.-public` .; paper at least On8 Issue nuisance under Section 731 of the California{ pd of Civil Procedure. commencing from the lath day of March -. .p All persons who can testify as to the facts :wlii"t 11th �y o* March constitute a public nuisance are invited to atte4 1971 , and ending on the said .hearing. Further information may be obfain�d n 19 71 both days inclusive, and as often during said period and from the office of the City Clerk. i times of publication as said paper was regularly issued, and in the regular and entire issue of said newspaper proper, and not in a DATED: supplement, and said notice was published therein on the following dates, to-wit: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH _._ Mar. 11} 1971 By: Paul C. Jones, City Clerk Published Huntington Beach,News (Aar.-li. 1971. .. Pub fisher Subscribed and sworn to before me this 12th day of rk. 1-bard ig-11L. Vv I cA •L :.0, Notary Public range County, California � THOMAS D. WYLLIE ,rv��tl Notary Public•Callornie Orange County My Commission.Ernirtls i September 12, 1974 r) M --Wi 11 iam — .:,.s 1Nlus postage) M �''=--Carlson * POSTMARK STREET AND N0. -�_� J r r t t y OR DATE q- �fi �t 18030 Beach Blvd., J CIO 00 C P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE CV �v CV Hgntch __ington_ Be OPTIONAL SERYICEa OR DOt oN-c92648_ RREiElp 1. Seowi to whom.an RVI, With deliver d date delivered-.._.•. i • • SERYICE8. 2• Shows to whom,y to addressee onl ... 150 data and where delivered Sr3 C DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE with delivery to addressee onl SPECIAL DELIVERY ONLY ..;. - - Y..;.........50� (2 pounds or less) ..... ...:.. .........._..__......... 0 POD corm 380Us. 45�July 1969 NO INSURANCE COVFRer_r �.;.....___ TRACT 6568 W%4L"t DAC Resident 8521 Milne Drive 21292 Antigua Lane Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif -92646 92646 - Res' t 2 21 Seaforth Lane Resident Resident Huntington Beach, CA. 21372 Antigua Lane 21282 Antigua Lane 92646 Huntington Beach, Calif Htmti.ngton Beach, Calif 92646 92646 Resident 21431 Seaforth Lane Resident Resident Huntington Beach, CA. 21362 Antigua Lane. 8511 St.- Augustine Drive_,- ` 92646 Huntington-Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 Y 92646 Resident 21441 Seaforth Dane Resident Resident- Huntington Beach, CA. 21352 Antigua Lane 8501. St Augustine Drive 92646 Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif - 92646 92646 Resident 8561 Sandy Hook Drive Huntington Beach, CA. Resident Resident 92646 21342 Antigua Lane 21281 Antigua Lane Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 . 92646 Resident 8551 Sandy Hook Drive Resident Resident Huntington Beach, CA. 21332 Antigua Lane 21291 Antigua Lane. 92646 Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, -Calif 92646 92646 .Resident 8541 Sandy Hook Drive Resident Resident Huntington Beach, Calif 21322 Antigua Lane 21301 Antigua Lana 92646 Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 Resident 8531 Sandy Hook Drive Resident Resident Huntington Beach, Calif 21312 Antigua Lane 21311 Antigua -Lane 92646 Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 Resident 8521 Sandy Hook Drive Resident Resident Huntington Leach,. Calif 21302 Antigua Lane 21321 Antigua Lane 92646 Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 Resident 8522 Milne Drive Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 Resident Resident 21331 Antigua Lane Tract 6568 8552 Sandy Hook Drive. HuntingtonI7each,' Calif : June 28, 1978 (JH) Huntington Beach' Calif 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident 21341 Antigua Lane. 21431 Antigua Lane 8562 Sandy Hook Drive Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Cal J Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646- 92646 Resident Resident Resident 21351 Antigua Lane 21441 Antigua Lane 8572 Sandy Hook Drive Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beachk, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident 21361 Antigua.Lane 8502 Sandy Hook Drive $unti.ngton Beach -Calif Huntington Beach Calif . 92646 " 92646 ' Resident Resident �- .21371 Antigua-Lane 8502 Sandy Hook Drive Huntington Beach;-Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 Resident _ Rasident 21381 Antigua Lane. 8512 Sandy Hook Drive . Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 . Resident Resident 21391 Antigua Lane 8522 Sandy Hoak Drive Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 Resident Resident 21401 Antigua Lane 8532 Sandy Hook Drive Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach Calif 92646 92646: Resident Resident 21421 Antigua Lane 8542 Sandy Hook.Drive Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 A N, HAMILTON & E. NE6JLAND SECURITY FORE 8/13/68 46 DWIM, TRACT NO, 6568 LOT NO, ADDRESS PLAN NO, LOT NO, ADDRESS PLAN NO, 10 21421 SEAFORTH LANE 533 24, 21291 ANTIGUA LANE 533 2, 21431 " if 743 250 21301 n of 295 3, 21441 tt to 895 26, 2133.1 it it 743 4, 8561 SANDY HOOK DRIVE 743 27, 21321 tt to 533 50 8551 it is it 937 28, 21331 n it 295 6, 8541 n to to 295 29, 21,341 n it 295 7, 8531 n it it 533 30, 21351 n it 895 80 8521 it n It 533 31, 21361 " it 533 90 8522 MILNE DRIVE 295 32, 21371 tt it 937 10, 8521 11 tt 937 33, 21381 " it 295 11, 21372 ANTIGUA LANE 295 34, 21391 it it 743 12, 21362 it to 295 350 21401 It if 533 13o 21352 't " 937 36, 21421 n " 295 14, 21342 " n 743 37, 21431 to to 295 15, 21332 tt it 937 380 21441 It n 743 16, 21322 if if 295 39: 8502 SANDY HOOK DRIVE 937 17, 21312 " it 937 400 8512 " " tt 533 181, 21302 rt to 895 41, 8522 It of It 743 190 21292 " it 295 42, 8532 n to it 895 20, 21282 it to 295 43. 8542 tt It n 295 21, 8511 ST. AUGUSTINE DR, 895 44, 8552 It it it 295 22, 8501 to tt tt 937 45, 8562 It it It 895 23. 21281 ANTIGUA LANE 533 46, 8572 to " of 895 Resident Resident 21371 Seaforth Lane Tract 6736 21352 Sand Dollar Lane Huntington Beach, Calif June 27, 1978 (JH) Huntington .Beach, Calif 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident. 21361 Seaforth Lase 21281 Seaforth Lane 21362 Sand Dollar Lane Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, .Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident 21351 Seaforth Lane 21.282 Sand Dollar Larbe 21372 Sand Dollar Lane Huntington Beach, Calif Huntingtn Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident 21341 Seaforth Lane- 21292 Sand Dollar Lane 21382 Sand Dollar Lane Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident 21331 Seaforth Lame 21302 Sand Dollar Lane 21392 Sand Dollar Lane Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident 21321 Seaforth Lane 21312 Sand Dollar Lane 8562 Milne Drive Huntington Beach,` Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach Calif 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident 21311 Seaforth Lane 21322 Sand Dollar Lane 8552 Milne Derive Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident 21301 Seaforth Lane 21332 Sand Dollar Lane 8542 Milne Drive Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident .Resident 21291 Seaforth Lane 21342 Sand Dollar Lane 8532 Milne Drive Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, CA. 92646 92646 92646, TRACT 6736 - _ a 6/27/78 DAC Resident Resident 8532 Milne Drive .21301 Sand Dollar Lane -Huntington Beach, CA. Huntington Beach, CA. 92646 92646 Resident Resident 8541 Mine Drive 21291 Sand Dollar Lane Huntington Beach; CA, 92646. Huntington Beech, CA. r 92646 Resident Resident 21371 Sand Dollar Lane Huntington Beach, .m 21218 Sand Dollar. 92646 Huntington Beach, CA. 92646 Resident 21361 Sand Dollar Lame Huntington Beach; CA. 92646 Resident 21351 Sand Dollar Lane Huntington Beach, ,CA. 92646 Resident .21341 Sand Dollar.Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Resident 21331 Sand Dollar Lane Huntington_i.Beach,..CA.. } ` 92646 �0 Resident 21321 Sand Dollar Lane Huntington Beach,. CA. y .92646 Resident 21311 Sand Dollar Lane. Huntington Beach, CA. 92646 Resident ' Resident 8521 St. Augustine Drive Tract 6736. 21352 Seaforth Lane Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 June 27, 1978 (JH) 92646. Resident Resident Resident 8531 St. Augustine Drive 21282 Seaforth Lane 21362 Seaforth Lane Huntingt:,aii Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Cali 92646 92646 9264f Resident ResidentResident 21292 Seaforth La ne ane 8541 St. Augustine-Drive 21372 Seaforth Lane Huntington beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif - Huntington Beach, Calif 92646* 92646 92646 Resident , Resident Resident 8551.St. Augustine Drive 21302 Seaforth Lane Calif21382 Seaforth Lane Huntington Beach, Calif .°Huntington Beach, Calif - Huntington Beach,- Cali 92646 92646 92646 Resident - - -Resident - Resident 8561 St. Augustine Drive 21312 Seaforth Lane 21392 Seaforth Lane " Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident 8571 St. Augustine Drive 21402 Seaforth Lane Huntington-Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 Resident. Resident Resident , 8581 St. 21322 Seaforth Lane Augustine -Drive Huntington Bieach, Calif 21401 Seaforth Lane Huntington-Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident- 21332S ` Resident t591 St. Augustine Drive' . eaforth Lane 21391 Seaforth Lane Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington teach, Calif -. . 92646 - Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 Resident R8601 St.esident. Augustine Drive dent 21342.Seaforth Larne. 213$iSe Seaforth Lane Huntington beach, Calif -" Huntington Beach, Calif' Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 92646 r� 1 1 / 'E o NLI-d AND, & N, I IAMILT ON - 3/11j69 SLABURY DEVELOPMENT ADDRESS CIl.v"INGE IN LOTS 2 thru 9 4/15/69 TRo 6736 LOT NO. ADDRISS PLAN NO. LOT NO, ADDRLSS PLAN NO. 10 8521 ST. AUGUSTINE DitIVE 937 36. 21282 SAND DOLLAR LANE 533 2, 8531 If 11 n 533 370 21292 11 It it 295 3. 8541- of If 11 295 38, 21302 11 1r 1t 937 ho 8551 If 295 390 21312 n it /1 295 50 8561. 11 rt n 937 40. 21322 n is 11 295 60 ;8.5n 1t r1 11 937 41. 21332 1s 11 11 743 70 8583. " 11 rs 295 42. 21342 " 11 1t 895 8, 8591 ,e 11 " 533 430 21352 11 1s 11 895 90 8601 " n n 895 44. 21362 11 n 11 937 10, 21262 SEAFOM LANE 533 450 21.372 1t " " 295 310 21292 to 11 895 46. 21382 11 n n 295 12, 21302 n s1 533 47. 21392 to 11 It 743 13. 21312 " of 895 48. 8562 MILNE DRIVE 533 1.4. 21322 "_ " 743 49. 8552 to 11 295 15, 21332 11 11 295 509, 8542 of 1< 895 16. 21342 11 s1 937 51. 8532 n n 295 17. 21352 11 " 295 52. 8531 s1 11 895 18. 21362 11 it 743 530 8541 of f1 937 19. 21372 1t 11 295 54. 21371 SAND DOLLAR LANE 295 20. 21382 11 it . 533 55. 21361 n 1e of 895 21, 21392 it 1t 295 56. 21351 n t' 11 " 937 22, 21402 11 11 533 57. 2131t1 n 11 11 295 23. 21401 1s If 533 580 21331 11 n 1t 533 24. 21391 11 1t 937 59. 21321 of of it 295 25, 21381 1t 11 895 600 21311 11 " 11 295 260 21371 11 If 295 61.0 21301 n It it 743 27. 21361 Is 11 295 62, 21291 1s of 1t 937 28. 21351 1t If 895 63. 21281 it 895 290 21341 2 19 295 30. 21331 11 11 895 310 21321 1t is 743 32 o 213U It is 295 33 o 21301 11 11 533 34. 21291 f9 1t 295 35. 21281 1B 1t 533 e TRACT 6567 6/27/78 DAC Resident Resident Resident R332, Hatteras Drive 21322 Breton Lane 8622 Hatterasq Drive Huntington Beach, CA. . Huntington Beach, CA. . Huntington Beach, CA. 92646 .92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident • 8632 Hatteras Drive. 21402 Breton Lane 21312 Breton Lane .Huntington' Beach, CA. Huntington" Beach, CA. Huntington Beach, CA. 92646 92646 92646 , `Resident -Resident: Resident 8642 Hatteras Drive 21392 Breton Lane 21302 Breton Lane Huntington Beach, CA. Huntington Beach", CA. Huntington Beach, CA. 98646 92646 .92646 -.- - Resident Resident Resident 9652 Hatteras Drive '. 213,82 Breton Lane 21292 Breton Lane . Huntington Beach, CA. Huntington. Beach, CA. Huntington Beach, CA. `92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident , 8662 Hatteras Drive 21372 Breton Lane 21291 Breton- Lane Huntington Beach, CA. Huntington Beach, CA. Huntington. Beach, CA. 92646 92646 92646 Resident- Resident . Resident 9682 "Hatteras Drive- 21362 Breton Lane .21301 Breton -Lane Huntington Beach, CA. -Huntington Beach, CA. Huntington -Beach, CA. 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident 8692 Hatteras Drive 21352 Breton Lane 21311 Breton Lane '- Huntington Beach, CA'.' Huntington Beach, CA. Huntington Beach, CA.`� 92646 9264.E "92646 Resident Resident Resident 8702 Hatteras Drive 21342 Breton Lane 21321 Breton Lane Huntington Beach, CA. Huntington Beach, CA.` -Huntington Beach, CA. 92646 92646 92646 . - Resident Resident Resident 8722 Hatteras . Drive 21332 Breton Lane 21341 Breton Lane Huntington Beach, CA. Huntington Beach,' CA. Huntington Beach, CA. 92646 92646 . 92646 - ; ,r .i✓✓i. LiGlVll LC111C - - -` -" - ' Huntington Beach, CA... ' 6/27/78 DAC 92646 21321 Yarmouth Huntington Beach,. CA. Resident 92646 1361 Breton Lane Hu gton Beach, CA. 92946 Residnt Resident 21331eYarmouth Lane 21362 Yarmouth Lane Huntington Beach, CA. Huntington ;Beach, CA. 92646 Resident 98646 21361 Breton Lane Huntington. Beach, CA Resident 92646 Resident ' 21352 Yarmouth Lane 21341 Yarmouth Lane Huntington Beach, CA. Huntington_ Beach, CA. Resident 92646 92646 21371 Breton Lane Huntington Beach, CA. 92646 _ Resident Resident " - �• 21342 Yarmouth Lane 2.1351 YarmouthLane Huntington Beach, CA. Huntington Beach, CA. Resident 92646 92646 21381 Breton Lane .Huntington Beach, CA: 92646 Resident Resident 21332 Yarmouth 21361 Yarmouth Lane Huntington Beach, Huntington, Beach,- CA. Resident 92646 21391. Breton Lane . Huntington Beach, CA. 92646 Resident Resident 21312 Yarmouth Lane 21351 Yarmouth Lane -Huntington Beach, CA. Huntington Beach, CA. .. Resident 92646 92646 21401 Breton Lane -Huntington Beach,CA. -92646 Resident Resident 21302 .Yarmouth Lane 21381 Yarmouth. Lane Huntington Beach, CA. Huntington" Beach,,.CA. Resident 92646 92646 21402 Yarmouth Lane . Huntington Beach, CA. Resident Resident 92646 1391 YarmouthLbane 21292 Yarmouth Lane 2 _ -Huntington Beach, CA. Huntington Beach, CA. 92646 _ 92646 Resident .21392 Yarmouth Lane Huntington Beach;" CA.92646 Resident Resident 21291 Yarmouth Lane 21401 Yarmouth Lane Huntington -Beach,- CA. Huntington Beach, CA. Resident 92646 92646 - � _ 21382 Yarmouth Lane Huntington Beach, CA.92646 Resident 21301 Yarmouth Lane Huntington Beach, CA. Resident 92646 21372 Yarmouth �u� CA. ; W o HAMILTON & E. NUMAND TRACT NO. 6567 4/23/63 SECURITY FORE CORP. LM NO. ADDRESS PIAN NO, LOr NO, ADDRESS PLAN NO. 10 8622 HATTERA.S DRIVE 295 270 21331 BFMON LANE 937 20 8632 " ra 533 28. 21341 to to 533 30 6642 n n 295 29, 21351 n it 295 4. 8652 It 1! 743 30, 21361 " 743 5m 8662 ►' to 295 3le 21371 " It 295 60 8682 It it 895 32, 21381 " n 937 7, 8692 " " 743 3U, 21391 n it 743 80 8702 If to 295 34. 21401 If 533 90 8722 " It 533 35, 21402 YARKOUTH LANE 533 19.0 6732 " If 937 360 21392 if to 743 no 21402 BIUNON LANE 295 37o 21362 a of 937 32, 21.392 tt is 295 380 21372 n it 895. 1-30 21382 1' '! 937 390 21362 " " 743 240 21372 " " 937 4o, 21352 tt tt 533 15, 21362 't " 895 410 21342 " " 295 16, 21352 tt it 533 420 21332 n n 295 170 21342 n If 295 430 21322 n " 743 la. 21332 er It 295 440 21312 If If 295 190 21322 it " 937 450 21302 tt If 937 200 21,312 it v 533 46, 21292 " is 533 21,6 21302 " 11 895 47, 21291 " it 533 22, 21292 If tt 743 480 21301 If to 895 230 21291 It to 533 490 21311 " " 937 24, 21301 it it 295 500 21321 " " 743 25a 21311. " °1 895 510 21331 2 " 533 260 21321 " " 743 52o 21341 It it 295 530 21351 it tr 937 54, 21361 " to 743 550 21371 it It 295 560 21381 " of 533 57, 21391 It it 743 5B, 2X401 it is 533 Tract 52.01 _6/27/78 - DAC Resident Resident Resident 9091 Re atta, Drive 9071 Bobbie Circle g 9022 Regatta Drivei Huntington Beach, CA. Huntington-Beach,_ CA. Huntington Beach, CA. 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident 9081 Regatta Drive ` 9032 Regatta Drive Huntington 90e Circle _Beach, CA. Huntington Beach, CA. Huntington Beach, CA. 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident - Resident 9041 Bobbie Circle 9071 Regatta Drive 904"2 Regatta Drive Huntington "Beach, CA. ..'_.Huntington .Beach, CA. Huntington Beach, CA'. 92646 9.2646 92646 Resident _ Resident Resident 9031 Bobbie Circle 9061 Regatta Drive 9062 •Re4atta Drive Huntington Beach,, CA. Huntington Beach, CA.. Huntington Beach, CA. 92646 - 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident 9021 Bobbie Circle 9041 Regatta Drive' 9072 Regatta Drive • Huntington Beach, CA. Huntington Beach, CA. - Huntington Beach, CA. . 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident 9001 Bobbie .Circle, ; 9031 Regatta Drive 9082 Regatta Drive Huntington Beach, CA. Huntington Beach, ' CA. Huntington Beach, CA. 92646 82646 92646 Resident Resident Resident 0002 Bobbie• Circle '9001 Regatta Drive 9092 Regatta Drive Huntington' Beach, CA. Huntington Beach, CA. Huntington Beach,CA. 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident 9091. Bobbie Dircle 9022 Bobbie Circle 9021 Regatta Drive Huntington Beach, CA. Huntington Beach, CA. Huntington Beach, CA. 92646 . 92646 92646 . Resident Resident "Resident 9081 Bobbie Circle 9032 Bobbie Circle 9002 .Regatta .Drive Huntington Beach, CA. Huntington Beach, CA. Huntington Beach, CA. 92646 92646 92646 TRACH 5201 . ' 6/27/78 - DAC 4 Resident Resident Resident 21532 Polynesian Lane 9042 Bobbie Circle 9041 Niguel' Circle . Huntington Beach, CA. , Huntington Beach, CA. Huntington Beach, CA. 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident ' * 21562 Polynesian Lane; 9062 Bobbie Circle 9031 Neguel Circle Huntington Beach, CA. Huntington Beach, CA. Huntington .Beach, .CA. 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident ' . RRRBx /9072 Bobbie Circle' 9021 Niguel Circle Huntington Beach, CA. Huntington Beach, CA. 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident 9001 Neguel Circle 9112 Regatta Drive 9682 Bobbie Circle Huntington Beach,_.CA. Huntington Beach, CA. w Huntington Beach, 'CA. 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident 9092 Bobbie Circle 21612 Polynesian Lane 9122 Regatta- Drive Huntington Beach, CA. Huntington Beach, CA. Huntington Beach, CA. 92646 - 92646. 92646 f Resident Resident Resident 9091 Niguel Circle 21962 Polynesian Lane 9132 Regatta Drive ._—. ..Huntington Beach, CA. Huntington Beach, CA: Huntington Beach, CA. 92646 92646 92646 Resident ,9081 Niguel Circle 21`592 Polynesian Lane Resident . Huntington Beach, CA. 3 Huntiggton Beach, CA. 9142 Regatta Drive 92646 92646 Huntington Beach, CA. 92646 Resident 11582 Resident 9071 Niguel Circle - 9162 Regatta Drive Huntington Beach, CA. Huntington Beach, CA. 92646 92646. Resident Resident- 21582 Po 9061 Niguel Circle Resident,- 9172 Regatta Drive • Huntington Beach, CA. _�- ' esian Lane Huntington Beach, CA. 92646 Huntington Beach, CA. 92646 92646 Resident` Resident Resident 21602 Kaneohoe Lane 9182 Regatta Drive 21622 Bahama Lane Huntington Beach, CA. Huntington Beach,. CA. Huntington Beach, CA. .92646 9264.E 92646 Resident Resident Resident 21612 Bahama Lane 21592 Kaneohe Lane 9191 Haiti Drive. Huntington. Beach, CA. Huntington Beach, -CA. .Huntington. Beach,..CA. 92646 . 92646 92646 Resident Resident. - Resident 21602 Bahama Lane 21582 Kaneohe Lane 9171 Haiti Drive Huntington Beach, CA. Huntington Beach, CA. Huntington. Beach, CA. 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident 9161 Haiti Drive 21592 Bahama Lane 21572 Kaneohe Lane Huntington. Beach, . CA: Huntington Beach, CA. Huntington -Beach, CA. 92646 92646 ' ' 92646 Resident Resident - Resident Resi Haiti Drive 21591 :Kaneohe Lane 21562 Kaneohe Lase Huntington Beach,. CA. Huntington .Beach, CA. Huntington. Beach, CA. 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident 21571 Bahama .Lane 21601 Kaneohe Lane 21542 Kaneohe Lane Huntington Beach, CA. Huntington BeachjlCA. Huntington Beach, CA.' 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident 21581 Bahama Lane 21611 Kaneohe Lane 21532 Kaneohe Lane Huntington Beach, CA. Hunt- ngton' Beach, CA. Huntington Beach, CA. 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident 21591 Bahama Lane 21621 Kaneohe Lane 21522 Kaneohe Lane Huntington Beach, CA. Huntington Beach.,- CA. Huntington Beach, CA, 92646 92646• 92646 Resident Resident Res ent 21601 Bahama Lane 21622 Kaneohe Lane Regatta rive Huntington Beach, CA. Huntington Beach, CA. Huntington ach, CA. 92646 92646. ' 9264.6 Resident Resident. 2"1 21611 Bahama Lane .21612 Kaneohe Lane Huntington Beach, CA. ._ Huntington Beach, CA. 92646. :92646 : TRACT 5201 -- 6/ZT/78 - DAC Resident 9191 Regatta Drive Huntington .Beach', CA. . 92646 Resident 9191 Regatta Drive Huntington Beach, .CA.. -92646 \� Resident,;, 9171 Regatta Drive. Huritii gton` .Beach, CA. - 92646 Resident 9161 Regatta Drive Huntington Beach,' CA. 92646 Resident 9141 Regatta Drive Huntington Beach, CA.- 92646 Resident 9131 Regatta Drive Huntington Beach, CA. 92646 Resident 9181 Regatta Drive- Huntington '-Beach, CA. 9264-5 Resident 9111 Regatta Drive Huntington Beach, CA. 92646 F asb ion ; o.-,ji s Tract 5201 Lot Address Last Address 11 9091 Regatta Dr, 460 21562 Pol.inesian. Li. 20 9081 " 470 9312 Regatta Dr, 9071. " 480 9122 to tam 9061 to 49. 9132 11 50' 9041 " 500 9142 It 6. 9031 " 51. 9162 t1 70 9021 " 52, 9172 It 80 9001 It530 9182 It 90 9002 it 540 9181 Haiti Dr0 10, 9022 " 550 9171 " U. 9032 " 560 9161 of 120 9042 " 570 9141 1 1 �1�3�0 9062 " 580 21571 Bahama Ln, 140 9072 of 590 21581 " 15a. 9082 to 6oa 21591 " 16. 9092 " 610 21601 " 170 9091 Bobbie Ciro 620 21611 " 180 9081 IT 6:Z0 2.t622 " 190 9071 IQ64. 21612 " 200 9061 of 650 21602 " 210 9041 " 660 21592 11 22, 9031. " 67. 21591 Kaneohe Lra 0 23 0 9023. " 68. 21601 11 24e 9001 " 690 21611 11 250 9002 " 70o 21621 tt 26, 9022 " 71. 21622 t1 270 9032 " 720 21612 " 280 9042 " 730 21602 " 290 9062 It 7h. 21592 t1 300 9072 It 750 21582 of 310 9082 It 760 21572 " 320 9092 If 770 21562 " 330 9091 Niguel Ciro 780 21542 of 34. 9081 " 790 21532 " 350 9071 " 800 21522 " 360 9061 " 810 9191 Regatta Dr,, 37. 9041 of 82, 9181 f4 38 0 9031 It 830 9171 11 39. 9021 " 84. 91.61 " hoC 9002 " 85. 9141 " (Model) L1:, 21F.12 Pcl,-�nesian Ln. 91.31 It n '4? 21602 11 9121 " t , 2: ��02 ,� 38 9111 19 „ 21 C 2 11 ` f AP'S TYPED BY GISEILA Bbsident Resident Resident 8522 Hamilton Ave. 8524 Hamilton Ave. 8532 Hamilton Ave. Huntington Beach, Calif. 92646 Huntington Beach,- Calif. 92646 Huntington Beach, Calif. 92646 - Resident Resident Resident 8534 Hamilton Ave. 8536 Hamilton Ave. 8538 Hamilton'Ave. Huntington Beach, Calif. - 92646 Huntington Beach, Calif. 92646. Huntington Beach,- Calif. 92646 Resident Resident Resident 8542 Hamilton Ave. . 8544 Hamilton Ave. 8552 Hamilton Ave. Huntington Beach, Calif. 92646, Huntington Beach, Calif. 92646 Huntington Beach, Calif. 92646 Resident Resident 8554 Hamilton Ave. 8562 Hamilton Ave. Huntiggton Beach, Calif. 92646 Huntington Beach, Calif. 92646 `Resi.dmt Resident Resident .8564_ .HaQni.lton Ave. 21281 Yarmouth-Lane ` 21282 Yarmouth Lane Hunk Beach, Calif. 92646 Huntington Beach, Calif. 92646 Huntington Beach, Calif: 92646 Resident Resident Resident 21281 Breton Lane 21282`Breton Lane 21272 Breton Lane Huntington Beach, Calif. 92646 Huntington Beach, Calif. 92646 Huntington Beach,-Calif. 92646 Huntington beach Union Steverson Bros. Southern Calif. Edison Co. High School District . .P.O. Box 335 Attn: Bill Campton 5201 Bolsa Ave. Huntington Beach, Calif. 92648 19171 Magnolia Huntington Beach, Calif. 92647 Huntington Beach, Calif. 92646 AP's TYPED BY GIsExA. - Resident Residefit Resident 21592 Newland-St. 21584 Newland St. 21582 Newlarid St. . Huntington Beach, Ca. 92646 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92646 Huntington Beach, Cal. 92646. Resident -Resident Resident 21562 Newland St. 21564 Newland St. 21572 Newland St. Huntington Beach, Ca. 92646 Huntington Beach,- CA. 92646 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92646 Resident Resident Resident .21564 Newland St. 21562 Newland St. 21552 Newland St. .Huntington Beach, Ca. 92646 Huntington Beach,_ Ca. 92646' Huntington Beach, Ca. 92646 Residehh Resident Resident 21544 Newland St. 21542 Newland St. 21534 Newland St. Huntington Beach,'Ca. :92646 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92646, Huntington Beach, Ca. 92646 Resident Resident Resident 21532 Newland St. 21524 Newland St. 21522 Newland St. Huntington Beach, Ca. 92646 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92646 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92646 Resident Resident Resident 8570 Hamilton Ave.. 8576 Hamilton Ave.. 8580 Hamilton Ave. Huntington Beach , Calif.92646 - Huntington Beach, Calif. -92646. . Huntington Beach, Calif. 92646 Resident Resident Resident 8586 Hamilton Ave. 8590.Hamilton Ave. ' 8596 Hamilton Ave.. Umtington.Beach -Calif. 92646 Huntington Beach, Calif. 92646 Huntington Beach, Calif. 92646 Resident Resident Resident 8600 Hamilton Ave. 8606 Hamilton Ave. 8610 Hamilton Ave. Huntington Beach, Calif. 92646. Huntington Beach, Calif. 92646 Huntington Beach, Calif. 92646 Resident Resident Resident. 8614 Hamilton Ave. 8616;Hamilton Ave. 8512-Hamilton Ave. Huntington. Beach, Calif. 92646 . Huntington Beach,-Calif. 92646 -Huntington Beach, Calif. 92646 :.4 o�J (�l � �t�C41lQ.vU l � � z 6z S z; � z � z z � �o 3 � �B !A aae PLANNING & ENVIRMENTAL RESOURCES DEPARTME. P.C. No. V" Land Use Plan Check — For Department Use Only T �KN Plan Dated: Job Address Use: I Checked BY: Previous Case Zone: Date: Admin Action Density Tentative Tract Lot Size Bldg.Size: Elev. Final Tract Lot Coverage Bldg. Height: Cond.of Appl. Routed `Fes No Dedication Reg. Bldg. Separation' DM Map Plot Plan Survey Improv. Req. Dim.to CL. Assessor Map Area of Interest PARKING SET BACKS R P Unit Covered Open Guest Total Type No. R P R P R P R P Front Yard Alley cutoff g Int.Side Yard Corner cutoff 1B Ext.Side Yard Arch.Features zB Rear Yard Fencing 3B Garage Eaves C Easements Stairs R P 1 OPEN SPACE R P I Landsca in Total General Turning Red. Req. Prop. Patio Curbs Drive Width Balconies Screening Space Dim. Total Handicap Mach.E ui . Striping Cable TV Wheel Stops Trash Area Park& Recreation Paid Yes No Amount Separation Wall C.of O.Inf.Mailed Yes No BUILDING PERMIT RELEASE DEPT. RELEASE ROUTED RELEASE RECEIVED DEPT. RELEASE ROUTED RELEASE RECEIVED OIL FIRE ENG. PLAN CORRECTIONS REQUIRED r. i.TLAIVTA & W. 2ikGNo'i3.A TRACT NU 6020 . . 'j3 D �G.sr SECURITY FORE CORP. BEVISID 6/21/ PLAN CHANGES REVISED 22/7/6; LM NO, ADDRESS PLAN NOv LOT NO,. . ADDRESS LOT , 10 8611 MARTINQUE DRIVE 184 7 3 48. 21171. BRETON LANE 5'1 20 8621 9 490 21181 7i� 30 21031 t21RAMAR LANE 500 21191 n of 29; 40 21041 to " 9 7 510 21201 :n To 53 50 21051 to Is 937 5210 23202 MIR,AM R LANE 5X 60 21061 n n 743 530 21192 of 29; 7, 21.081. " to 295 540 2322 '° " 29! 80 21091 w 895 550 21172 to to 53' 90 21101 " to 184 560 21162 to " 181 10, 21l11 it 7143 570 2W n it 74' I.lo 21121 If " In 937 580 86La DORSETT DRIVE 29s 120 21131 It " 937 590 865'2 n eo 53: 130 21141 ". to 937 600 . 86(¢., to ro 29! 140 211b1 . " of 743 610 8672. n n 29! 150 21171 " " 295 620 8682 " " 181 16o 21181 " if 533 630 86SR " It 74? 17o 21191 . " to SO 895 640 21112 BARBADOS CIRCIE 53: 18, 21201 of it 20 895 650 21102 " " 29! 190 8612 SABLE DRIVE 895 660 21092 " to 55 ! 200 8622 " It 533 670 21082 210 8632 It to 895 680 23A62 " " 5 220 86142 to of 295 690 21652 1t " •29 23. 8652 " 295 700 21042 24. 8662 " " 533 710 21032 It to 25. 8661. ST. AUGUSTINE DR, 533 720 22022 " " 74. 260 8651 i1 16 to = 937 . 730- 21002 29! 27. 8641 to to itINX 937 740 21001 n to; 41 28, 8631 " " " W 895 750 21021 "' .51 290 8621 " " n 5�333� 760 2103��1 " n 29' 00 8611 it " MM 743 170 21041 n n 201 310 0 . 533 780 22051 " " 531 32 0 21282 _ n 533 790 2.1061 to 2;$1 330 2 BRETON LANE 533 800 21W3. " 29.1 340 1282 to n 295 810 21091 " " ?4: 3 21272 " n 743 820 21101 53: 0 n n 295 83 0 2711.1 rr n 29! 242 370 21 295 840 2UU IKIAMUR. LANE _ 89, 380 21232 If " 743 850 21102 MIRR14I4R LAMB 93' 390 21222 " " 743 860 21092 400 21202 " " 295 870 2108 , " " 891 410 21192 " " 184 880 21062 n " 9y 420 21182 " to 295 890 21052 to to MODEL 29 430 23.172 " " 743 900 21042.. " n MODEL 714 440 21162 is Is 743 910 21032 " " MODEL 53, 450 21l42 " " 295 920 21022 " to MODEL 18, 460 21141 " 533 93. 21002 11 to MODEL 29, 47. 21161 It 184 s. . . . Resident Resident 9112 Aloha Drive Tract 3898 21851 Kiowa Lane Huntington Beach, Calif June 27, 1978 (JH) Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 Resident Occupant Resident 9102 Aloha Drive 21941 R'iowa Lane 21841 Kiaaa'Lane Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach"Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 92646 Occupant ®esident Resident 9092 Aloha Drive 21931 Kiowa Lane 21831 Kiowa Lane Huntington Beach, Calif. Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646_ 92646 92646 :; Mident Resident Resident 2 Aloha Drive 219U Kiaaa Lane 21821 Kiowa Lane Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, -Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident Occupant 9062 Aloha Drive 21901 Kianra Lane 21811 Kiawa -Lane Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident 9052 Aloha Drive 21891 Kiowa Lane 21801 Kiowa Lane Huntington Beach Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident 9042 Aloha Drive 21881 Kiowa Lane 21781 Kiowa Lane Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington.Beach, Calif Huntington_Beach'Calif 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident 9022 Aloha Drive 21871 Kiowa Lane 21771 Kiowa Lane Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident 21961 Kiowa Lane 21861 Kiowa Lane 9001 Bermuda Drive 8untington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach,, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident - 21742 Kaneohe-Lane Tract 3898 21932 Kaneohe Lane Huntington BeehU,: Calif June 27, 1978 (JH)- Hunting m Beach, Calif- .92646 92646 Resident - Resident Resident 21752 Kaneohe Lane 21842 Kaneohe Lane 21942 Kaneohe Lane Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, CA.i.f 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident .21762 Kaneohe Lane 21852 Kaneohe Lane 9202 Aloha Drive Huntintington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident 21772 Kaneohe Lane. 21862 Kaneohe Lane 9192 Aloha Drive Huntington Beach, Calif Humtington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif, 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident. Resident '21792 Kanedhe-Lane 21872. Kaneohe Lane 9182 Aloha Drive Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif .92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident 21809 Kaneohe Lane 21892 Kaneohe Lane 9172 Aloha Drive Huntington° Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif '92646 92646 92646 ' Resident Resident Resident . 21812 Kaneohe Lane 21902 Kaneohe Lane 9152 Aloha Drive Huntington Beach,. Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif. 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident 21822 Kaneohe Lane 21912 Kaneohe Lane 9142 Aloha Drive .Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach. Calif 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident. 21832 Kaneohe Lane 21922 Kaneohe Lane 9122 Aloha Drive Huntington-Beach, Calif Huntington Beach,. Calif Huntington;Beach, Calif 92646 92646 . 92646 Resident Resident 9021 Bermuda Drive o 9152 Bermuda Drive .. _ ,. Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, "-Calif 92646 Tract 3898 (JH) 92646 Resident Resident Resident 9031 Benmida Drive 9131 Bermuda Drive 9142 Ber mda Drive Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 9264.6 92646 Resident Resident Resident esi enrmuda Drive 9141 Benmida Drive 9132 Benmida Drive 9051 Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington.Beach, Calif 92646- 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident 9122 Bermuda Drive 9061 Bermuda Drive 9151 Benmida Drive . Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington 92646 92646 92646 . ' Regi dent Resident R9081 Bermuda Drive 9161 BenmLda Drive 9112 Bermuda Drive' ` 081 " Huntington Beach, Calif. -Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, "Calif 92646 92646 92646 Resident Rodent Resident 9091 Benmida Drive 9171 Benmada Drive 9102 Bermuda Drive Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident 9101 Benmida Drive 9191 Benmida Drive 9092 Benmida. Drive Huntington Beach, .Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident 9111 Bermuda Drive 9172 Benmida Drive 9082 Bentnuda Drive- Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington-Beach, Calif 92646 92646 92646 . Resident Resident Resident 9121 Be_rnwda Drive 9162 Benmida Drive . "9062 Benmida Drive Hunti.ngton-Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident 217.71 Kivwa Lane Tract 3898 9162' Kahula Drive . Huntington Beach, Calif June 27, 1978 (JH) Huntington Beach, Calif . 92646 92646 �`R,esident Resident Resident 21782 Kiawa Lane. 9131 Kahula Drive 9152 Kahula• Drive Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 92646 Resident ' Resident Resident 21802 Kiawa Lane 9141 Kahula Drive 9142 Kahula Drive Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach', Calif 92646 92646 - 92646 ' Resident . Resident Resident .9061 Kahula Drive 9151 Kahula Drive 9142 Kahula Drive Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 92646 Resident „9081 Kahula Drive Resident Resident 'HuntingtAn Beach,. Calif 9161 Kahula Drive 9122 Kahula Drive 92646 Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident 9091 Kahula Drive 9171 Kahula Drive ` 9112 Kahula Drive Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 - 92646 92646 T Resident . Resident Resident, 9101 Kahula Drive , 9191 Kahula Drive 9102 Kahula Drive Huntington Beach,-Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif . 92646 = 92646 92646 Resident Resident- Resident 9111 Kahula Drive -9192. Kahula Drive - 9092 Kahula Drive Huntington Beach_ ; Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif . 92646 .. 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident 9121 Kahula Drive 9172 Kahula Drive 9082 Kahula Drive Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington .Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 92646 ResidentResident 9062 Kahula Drive - Ttact 3898 � " 9172 Mahalo Drive- Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif June 27, 1978 (JH) 92646. 92646 Resident Resident Resident, 9121 Mahalo Drive �. 9162 Mahalo Drive 21822 Riowa Lane Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach' Calif 92646 92646 92646' 'Resident Resident Resident ne 9131 Mahalo Drive 9152 Mahalo Drive - 218 2 nt La ington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 * 92646 z Resident Resident Resident 21842 Kiowa Lane 9141 Nlahalo Drive 9142 Mahalo Drive ...Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident 9061 Mahalo Drive 9151 Mahalo Drive 9122 Mahalo Drive 'Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach,Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident Resi Mahalo Drive 9161 Mahalo Drive 9112 Mahalo Drive 9081 Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif . 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident 9091 Mahalo Drive 9171 Mahalo Drive 9102 Mahalo Drive Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident 9191 M Mlo. Drive 9092 Mahalo Drive 9101 Mahalo Drive Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Bch, Calif 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident 9102 Mahalo Drive 9082 Mahalo,Drive Hunt Sant Mahalo Drive ." . - Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif ington Beach' Calif 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident 9072 Mahalo Drive Tract 4898 9192 Kapaa Drive Huntington Beach, Calif June 27, 1978 WH) Huntington Bch, Calif - 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident . 9062 Mahalo Drive 9101 Kapaa.Drive 9172 Kapaa Drive Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif- Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 2MM92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident 21802 Kiowa Lane 9111 Kapaa-Drive 9162 -Kaj*a Drive Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington- Beach, Calif 92646 92646 92646 °,Resident Resident Resident 21872 Kiawa Lane 9121 Kapaa Drive 9152 Kapaa Drive `Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident 21882 Kiowa Lane 9141 Kapaa. Drive 9142 Kapaa Drive Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach Calif Huntington Beach; Calif 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident 9061 Kapaa Drive 9151 Kapaa Drive 9122 Kapaa Drive Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident Re 9072 Kappa Drive 9161 Kapaa Drive 9112. Kapaa Drive' Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach-, Calif 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident 9081 Kapaa Drive 9171 Kapaa DriveM 9102 Kapaa Drive Huntington Beach;' Calif Huntington Beach, Calif. Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident Resident 9091 Kapaa Drive 9191 Kapaa Drive 9092. Kapaa.Drive Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington-Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 92646 Resident Resident 9082 Kapaa Drive, Tract 3898 9191 Aloha Drive Htmtingti Beach, Calif June 27, "1978 (JH) Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 Resident " Resident 9072 Kapaa Drive 9091 Aloha Drive Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington. Beach, Calif 92646 92646 Resident. ; Resident 9062 Kapaa Drive 9101 Aloha Drive :Huntington Beach, Calif-- 'Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 Resident Resident 21902 Kiowa Lane , 9111.Aloha Drive Huntington beach, Calif. Huntington-Beach, Calif 92646 ..92646 Resident Resident 21912•Kiowa"Lane_ 9121 Aloha Drive Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 Resident Resident 21932 Kiowa Drive 9141_Aloha Drive Huntingtcnz. Beach,.. Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 .92646. Resident" Resident 9061 Aloha Drive 9151 Aloha Drive . Huntington Beach, Cal i f Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 Resident Resident. 9071 Aloha Drive'- 9161 Aloha Drive Huntington Beach, Calif Huntingtcn Beach, Calif 92646 92646 . Resident Resident 9081 Aloha Drive 9171 Aloha Drive Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92646 92646 . 4 . t;-' s 11t yli y� ..r. - F t(� ! .St f. YJu�. [t•I'�.A �r�. ) , Cl•.l}:i .1 �}.,!��`. { '1- t ' .��_/.';.• �tl{1 S'�-wll:;/!•.:i.ilF! - i:5��-. 15� �1 tllP 4r'.••74 �.:� :a� �d•9� 1Tt' �..+�'�r1oj:��A��e _ 12 17 .r.^� 5 V t, la 3 5s ,�-: l �s 1i4-^ FaJq 2187 ,r G •r ,• •� i. l 'Cr [r ra 19 16 9-1jI? It rC, fir, 9 L2� *7 ) 2 54J '0 - {boo - o",L5.a: a: R: qi.1{f,L rR -' 2 o 118 2 ro t'1 ,ni w�o 9191 ..1. 917 2 j'.1 n T'1i? to IP `� n 91.62 26 9':1 2i: ip to RG r, '1 5a � r. n �- 27, 27., 3'Jp 2 y J 01. 932.2 { 302 3d. g4)1."!? It t) 10-37 91,02 11561 9062 t, 35 ?. ;'�'A Ii,.0 r is'r ! t.7 ?fir , a '.J. p s r!1 j. ��' /I"t(l�t.t . .tl 'a,I�,, �n � -12 i rY �•n 219 A.� ti 'C 110c o 211842 i n"y t.1� 7 j L^"., 21931 V iC - �O,il 9061 � a"d.:..!U,"'I t� MOM tAa.n 2.!(jr ,' �d.►r, :�EiEta, to ,� ,:_, ... ;. 1 pp r� A iC.�t,1 r•.P. ..,.J;,r 9 t n 2.3 . i 40171. Ltp (:..S.trr3��J..0 ! 45t•) 2.4.IJs,�. t3 ,C - �'•.).a'.n '�"�Cl'� Y� e4 zp 122 91-5-2 t, s 50, q. S9 a.. 9.172 } iCr'� - 51,. 217'.7 tP tS 12 3 9.1 2 OT r n r� j:R)gr 9�C?2 it 3 .7 e : 12S.•. 2 G<::2 ( �•� 1.!1 2 to • 1 y, 1 A.il•IA }4, 4•po ll.t�.S�Sh daia? �.�61t. NQn y • � .�s.��,, CHA 9: ;� so �a 1ys�fTr� ,�7�.�Z'�y; L 9111 55 00172 a s 1 le 171,, 93_41, I rs se 915-2 P e ry 9-1 r� I P57s; f-> 1J: g4,15`? SR iQ I 1902 .16 SS CG J q 1 • 80 ' y , • F � �°Iieeeeeileiln■ .. . : �t IIIII �IIInI� •• �■neeee. IIIW t� •• � �In1i�ei�iiiiiiii• : 1l111 S O�Io iI Ilogil �VIIIIIIIii1IiII/� `'Z _. a � �I®�0 `� �IIIIIIIIIIIIII■ � ,;_.,::r:, • - a'a!a e ■ � ■IIIIIIIIIIIIII�•_ � 1 �■. IIIIII IIII II ,� � � � II00 elilo II■ -■eea eeo■■, -��• IIII -I NIIlE av av-ae-v��a � aowsas �oa � • e_m®®.II III eoe=���_.o-�A_.. o or oo r::ran a- � sad r�:rr ro 0o de od ■� as.o _ S dd 00 Ym eO de On OA O 1 • ► p dO ail da 0!! oO 4S'oO'eA'eO O - ,, o dl� � ed ad sv 000e a oI000e o eeesBelCompae e s ao vs o■o ee :. . . � o � � to os:Qom_tee_QQ-o.vooeeeeesov oo,e � sa-eo ao•'.e d• no Oiil'Iisl°°°�-v� a ' easesasoaoeeavneonooaoaoovomrcnae000 a ' IIIIIIIIIIII■I��I MIIIIIIIImilli IIIIII■ ■/IIIIIIII■ C : I1IIIII�� S� �II■IIIIII■ . • �. ... ■IIIInI/rIIIIIII�-:: �_-■IIIIIIIII� w Iilii■1►�: `: : (IIIIIIII . • • Si I■■ �i ■IIIIr�� IIII�II� IIIII� i ii Si ■■■�� �' ■■ a w�..■II/■I�e OIe1I�� t+a� �I■(IIIIII"■IIIIr�'tIIIIII =�wII:� �\IIIIII IIII �� ■IIIIIIIIIIIIII�� .z J ,: IIIn111I111I�:�`t1IIIII �S; _S iIIIIIIIIII� M M� Oi M - ■■■■■� � r.�InIIIIIIIv ■, •IIIIII ■III//��� "� i �I I■■� 06 RM ■I/IIIII� IIII\'•.-.� � r' i� IInII1IIIII.�� � ■ ■■I■■ �� � � � IIII ;i �� � pI11111I-� • � IIIIInI-■IIIIIIn�■III II �� � ` tI�I\'•• ��.: �tII111I ` S IIIV�S�■■IIIII��tII1I11 �� � � (IIIIII" �v � �I111111-� • IIII►. S ■ IIII�`/Iltilt.�: � I�111111/�I� /�■■ �tlnill S Itt111MI' `HIII I���-■IIIIt� �III/III\� �►\IIIIIIII ■I I��i i ■IIIII/ ■■■IIIIII■ Iloilo NINE �■':` �/11l111� �IIIIIIIIII, IIIIII O �► ■Ie.... = 0 1111111■I; IIIII = MINN IIII ., Ie� ��� � � IIIII I\�■�i IIII ■IIII/IS IIII ��` � = IIIII I �_•�'� �� r IIIII��r 1�1�1 i IIIIMINIII1111�� P- �FZRM-THE DESK OF W1 .A d DU IL0.1t Jeri(AeneUe IHUNTINGTON BEACH PlIc" /xc . cL. 41A,4 3 c?L c.-Jkc�:44, -L. E ' v / NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice,is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, at..an adjourned meeting thereof to be held in ' the Council..Chamber of the Civic. Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of P.M.. or as soon thereafteras possible, on Monday, the loth of July, 1978, for the purpose of receiving evidence that a public nuisance exists at 'the mud dump located at the southwest corner of Magnolia Street and Hamilton Avenue, and for, the possible direction by the City Council to the City Attorney to take civil action to, abate such public nuisance under Section 731 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. All persons who can testify .as to the facts which constitute a public nuisance are invited to attend said hearing. Further information may be obtained from the office of the City Clerk. Dated City of Huntington Beach J by Alicia M. Wentworth C`c �ka5h' City Clerk ,,� e ) 4,4-e,� " . .. - •: � .,-r.,� .emu.-,..-�.l /�-�'�-�,.— -Va 7` ,.r�•.•�°•��-- Publish - 6/,1e/78 Black Box NOTICE OF PUBLIC �alt HEARING STEVERSON BROS. MUD DUMP Notice is .hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, at an adjourned meeting thereof to be held in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:30 P:M. or as soon thereafter as possible, on , ther,of July, 1978, for the purpose of receiving evidence that a public nuisance exists at the Steverson Bros. Mud Dump located at the southwest corner of Magnolia Street and Hamilton Avenue, and for the possible direction by the City Council to the City Attorney to take civil action to abate such public nuisance under Section 731 of the California Code of Civic Procedure. All persons who can testify as to the facts which constitute a public nuisance are invited to- attend said hearing: Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main St. , Huntington Beach, CA. (714) 536-5226. Dated: 6/21/78 City of Huntington Beach By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk Published Huntington Beach News, June 29, 1978. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING STEVERSON BROS. MUD DUMP Notice is hereby given that a pub- lic hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, at an adjourned meeting thereof to be held in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Hunt- ington Beach, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. or as soon thereafter as pos- sible„ on Tuesday, the 11th of July, 1978, for the purpose of receiving evidence that a public nuisance ex- ists at the Steverson Bros. Mud Dump located at the southwest corner of Magnolia Street and Hamilton Ave- nue, and for the possible direction by the City Oouncil to the City At- torney to take civil action to abate such public nuisance under Section 731 of the California Code of Civic Procedure. All persons who can testify as to the facts which constitute a public nuisance are invited to attend said hearing. Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main St., -Huntington Beach,CA. (714) 536-5226. Dated: 6-21-78 .City of Huntington Beach By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 2000 Main Street was Hale Pit Huntington Beach, California 02648 U-sitsuo9F t t( a , CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 78-41 COUNCIL-ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To Honorable Mayor and From Floyd G. Belsito City Council . Members City Administrator Subject STEVERSON BROTHERS MUD Date July 10 , 1978 DUMP HEARING Attached is a script for tomorrow' s public hearing to determine if the Steverson Brothers Mud Dump constitutes a public nuisance. Also attached is a memo from :the City Attorney regarding the procedures for enjoining a public nuisance and -.a memo regarding the .Cali,fornia Regional Water Quality Control Board ' s invovement . The public hearing is scheduled for 7 : 30 p.m. and is to be h.eld in the Council Chambers . Respectfully submitted , Floyd Belsito City dmi rii strator FGB :JC :bb n Attachments ECOLOGY PRODUCTS INC. P.O. Rex zoos i- E. BOUGLAS REBBAN Santa Barbara, CA 93120 President Phone: (805) 963-1905 i i PUBLIC HEARING STEVERSON BROTHERS MUD DUMP Purpose - To take testimony to determine if the Steverson Brothers Mud Dump constitutes a public nuisance . Clerk to swear in all persons who wish to give testimony. Open the public hearing. Each person who testifies must first state he was sworn in. Close the public hearing. Council may determine that there are not sufficient facts to determine that a public nuisance exists . Or, Council may find that there are sufficient facts to support a conclusion that a public nuisance exists , and direct the City Attorney to draft proposed findings of fact based on the evidence presented to support the conclusion that a public nuisance in fact exists . 7, iQ79 � r CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH r INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To Floyd G . Belsito From : Jeri Chenelle City Administrator Administrative Aide II Subject STEVERSON BROTHERS MUD DUMP Date : July 10 , 1978 I spoke today with Bruce Paine of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board who indicated the Board is satisfied with the progress being made by Steverson Brothers toward compliance with their Cease and Desist Order. He said they were not interested in testifying at the public nuisance hearing . As far as they are concerned, a threat of nuisance no longer exists , since discharges have stopped and Newland Street has been cleaned. JC: ik n' California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region July 14, 1978 ITEM: 21.a, SUBJECT: Status of Actions by Steverson Brothers pursuant to Cease and Desist Order No. 78-107. DISCUSSION: Improvements and repairs of the site have begun as outlined in the- Steverson Brothers consultant H.V. Lawmaster and Company, Inc. report dated May 25, 1978. This was confirmed by staff inspection on June 7, 1978. On June 14, Steverson Brothers was informed that the Lawmaster report had two major deficiencies and was requested to submit the following by July 6, 1978: 1. Plans and calculations for containing the storm water from a: 100-year, 24-hour storm. 2. Completion date for all improvements. At the present time Steverson Brothers is not.violating their waste waste discharge requirements and the threat of a violation has been minimized. The staff will continue to monitor Steverson Brothers progress towards compliance with the Cease and Desist order. I C. CITY COUINC L Qrril- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 78-41 c{• COUNCIL-ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To Honorable Mayor and From Floyd G. Belsito City Council Members City Administrator Subject STEVERSON BROTHERS MUD Date July 10 , 1978 DUMP HEARING Attached is a script for tomorrow ' s public hearing to determine if the Steverson Brothers Mud Dump constitutes a public nuisance . Also attached is a memo from the City Attorney regarding the procedures for enjoining a public nuisance and a memo regarding the .California Regional Water Quality Control Board ' s invovement . . The public hearing is scheduled for 7 :30 p .m. and is to be held in the Council Chambers . Respectfully submitted , Floyd Belsito City dministrator FGB :JC :bb Attachments PUBLIC HEARING STEVERSON BROTHERS MUD DUMP Purpose - To take testimony to determine if the Steverson Brothers Mud Dump constitutes a public nuisance . Clerk to swear in all persons who wish to give testimony. Open the public hearing. Each person who testifies must first state he was sworn in. Close the public hearing. Council may determine that there are not sufficient facts to determine that a public nuisance exists . Or, Council may find that there are sufficient facts to support a conclusion that a public nuisance exists , and direct the City Attorney to draft proposed findings of fact .based on the evidence presented to support the conclusion that a public nuisance in fact exists . 7, 1g79 J' CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To • Floyd G . Belsito From : Jeri Chenelle City Administrator Administrative Aide II Subject STEVERSON BROTHERS 14UD DUMP Date : July 10 , 1978 I spoke today with Bruce Paine of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board who indicated the Board is satisfied with the progress being made by Steverson Brothers toward compliance with their Cease and Desist Order. He said they were not interested in testifying at the public nuisance hearing . As far as they are concerned, a threat of nuisance no longer exists , since discharges have stopped and Newland Street has been cleaned. JC. ik _F i California Regional dater Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region July 14, 1978 ITEM: 21.a. SUBJECT: Status of Actions by Steverson Brothers pursuant to Cease and Desist Order No. 78-107. DISCUSSION: Improvements and repairs of the site have begun as outlined in the Steverson Brothers consultant H.V. Lawmaster and Company, Inc. report dated May 25, 1978. This was confirmed by staff inspection on June 7, 1978. On June 14, Steverson Brothers was informed that the Lawmaster report had two major deficiencies and was requested to submit the following by July 6, i978: 1. Plans and calculations for containing the storm water from a 100-year, 24-hour storm. 2. Completion date for all improvements. At the present time Steverson Brothers is not violating their waste waste discharge requirements and the threat of a• violation has been minimized. The staff will continue to monitor Steverson Brothers progress towards compliance with the Cease and Desist order. LJ (r I j C :Y 0z I U G1 !AE 0;; CITY cou'�•.' July 10 , 1978 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: City Attorney SUBJECT: Procedure and Standards for Enjoining a Public Nuisance In the upcoming hearing concerning the Steverson Brothers Mud Dump , the Council will be asked to determine whether the facts are sufficient to establish. a public nuisance . If a public nuisance is determined to exist , then a civil action may be brought to enjoin it . The Council' s findings , of course , are . not binding on the court , which must make an independent deter- mination. The action is brought by the City Attorney, and the city pays the expenses of the suit . The following is a brief summary of the procedure and applicable standards : "Nuisance" is defined as follows : "Anything which is injurious to health, or is indecent or offensive to the senses , or an obstruction to the free use of property , so as to interfere with the com- fortable enjoyment of life or property, or unlawfully obstructs the free passage or use, in the customary manner, of any navigable lake , or river, bay, stream, canal, or basin, or any public park, square , street , or highway is a nuisance. " Code of Civil Procedure Section 3479 . A public nuisance is "one which affects at the same time an entire community or neighborhood, or any considerable number of persons , although the extent of the annoyance or damage inflicted upon individuals may be unequal. " Code of Civil Procedure Section 3480 . A public nuisance may be abated by civil or criminal actions brought by public officers , but a private person has no direct remedy unless the nuisance is specially injurious to him. This is a primary distinction between a private and .a public nuisance . In extraordinary circumstances , a public nuisance which is such a present danger so as to require immediate abatement may be sum- marily abated by the city . But where no emergency exists ,- summary abatement is a denial of- due process .. After a public hearing, at which all parties have an opportunity to testify under oath, the City Council should consider the evidence and make findings of fact and a conclusion of law that a public nuisance does or does not exist . In order to sustain a Memo to- Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Re : Procedure and Standards for Enjoining a Public Nuisance July 10, 1978 Page 2 finding of a public nuisance , the Council must make specific factual findings on the following issues : 1. That the present use of the property is injurious to health, or is indecent or offensive to the senses , or an obstruction to the free use of property, so as to interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property, and 2 . That the nuisance affects an entire community, neighborhood, or a considerable number of persons . Numerous types of activities may constitute a nuisance , if they distrub or prevent the comfortable enjoyment of land, even though they do not directly damage or prevent the use of land. Examples are smoke, noxious odors, noise, dust , smog, harmful gases , and dangerous conditions . A preexisting use may become a nuisance due to new development in the area. It is generally no defense to the finding of a, nuisance that those complaining of it acquired their property with knowledge of the existence of the nuisance . The test of liability for a nuisance with regard to personal dis- comfort is the effect of the alleged annoyances on normal persons of ordinary sensibility. Thus , it is no ground for a finding of nuisance that particular persons may be adversely affected because of special. sensibilities . There are a number of defenses that may be raised against the exist- ence .of a nuisance . They include the following: 1. No one may be enjoined from the reasonable and necessary operation of any use expressly permitted in the zone , nor shall such use be deemed a nuisance without evidence of the employment of unnecessary and injurious methods of operation. If a use is legally nonconforming under the zoning ordinance , it is more likely to be found to create a nuisance than if it were expressly permitted under the zoning ordi- nance. 2. The inconvenience , discomfort or hurt complained of Memo to Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Re : Procedure and Standards for Enjoining a Public Nuisance July 10, 1978 Page 3 must be such a material annoyance that resulting damages to those allegedly aggrieved can be pre- sumed. 3. There is also a necessity to consider conflict- ing interests, concerning whether the harm suffered outweighs the utility of the conduct . This is com- monly known as balancing the convenience . Even if the activity does constitute a nuisance, unusual hardship might be a defense if the loss to a land- owner maintaining the nuisance would be entirely out of proportion to the damage suffered by the public . 4 . Laches which is such unreasonable delay in asserting a right that the granting of equitable relief is inequitable, is also a defense . The foregoing is a brief overview of a rather involved subject . We will -be glad to address any specific questions that the Council may have. Respectfully submitted, GAIL HUTTON City Attorney By ROBERT SANG TER Deputy City Attorney GH:RS :bc cc: City Administrator Planning Director Public Works Director _ ~ -... `-'-_ _~........................... L ��----' ----------------------���--------------------__ MUD HAULING DEALERS IN OIL FIELD SCR } �I $r�N//! STEVERSON BROS. 4T? r P.O. BOX 335 . . . HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 Phone 847.1072 July 10 , 1978 Huntington Beach City Council Post Office Box 190 Huntington Beach , California 92648 Dear City Council Members : The Steverson Bros . , a local corporation , and its predecessor partnership , Steverson Bros . , has been engaged in business in the City of Huntington Beach for over thirty years . Its activi - ties have included oil field mud hauling and dealing in oil field scrap . During this entire time , it has substantially contributed to the economy of this community . At the time when our business first commenced operating in Hunt- ington Beach , this was a small community with a population of under 10 , 000 with much open space and little development . Since that time , the City has grown and become urbanized and highly developed . We have attempted to live in the changing environ- ment and to cooperate from time to time with the various govern- mental bodies which regulate our operations . The matter before the City Council involves the 37 acres located at Hamilton and Magnolia Streets in Huntington Beach . This prop- erty has been owned and operated by us since approximately 1950 . It was acquired for the purpose of operating a dump at this site . In connection therewith , oil field wastes from the local Hunting- ton Beach oil fields were deposited at that site . At the time that the property was acquired the entire surrounding area was vacant of development . Although cautioned that the property was being used as an oil field mud dump , developers purchased the adjoining land and built homes , with resulting conflict between the older use and the newer residential area . In an attempt to cooperate with the residents of the community , we proposed to the City in 1971 that we cease dumping liquid oil field wastes at this site . This was done in the spirit of cooper- ating with our neighbors and with the City in an attempt to allevi - ate the complaints of the residents ralative to odors that were claimed to have emitted from the site . We have faithfully com- plied with our agreement with the City in this regard . p Huntington Beach City Council Page Two July 10 , 1973 The past winter rains have caused certain conflicting directions from the various regulatory agencies as to the operation and safeguarding of the property . For example , in one instance , the City of Huntington Beach directs us to dispose of excess rain water in the storm drain , and in the other instance , the Water Quality Control Board requires us to dispose of it in the sewer , each to the exclusion of the other disposal method . We find it extremely difficult to comply with directions which are in con- fl i ct. Presently , we have been attempting to place this property into a position where it can be sold . In fact , this property was in escrow for several years , but when the developer who was inter- ested in the purchase proceeded to request a zone change , the property was nut in a holding zone . This action certainly did not assist the sale of this property , which subsequently fell through . We would desire to have this property sold and devel - oped . Since 1971 , we have spent many thousands of dollars in an attempt to care properly for the property and sufficiently main- tain its condition . A brief summary of the expenses incurred in this regard is attached hereto . We feel we have diligently and faithfully acted as " Good Neighbor" in the City of Huntington Beach , and that we have faithfully com- plied with our agreements with the City of Huntington Beach here- tofore reached . It is respectfully suggested that the declaration of this property as a nuisance , or any abatement action would be an inappropriate action for the City Council to take . We respect- fully request that you reject such attempt to do so . Very truly yours , STEVERSON BROS . 5 _ .. CYO, t/✓f C}f /ff�' J ii"q' By : Carl Steverson , President CS : mr Enclosure r Page #14 - Council Minutes - 4/19/71 Mayor McCracken declared the hearing open. There being no one present to speak on the matter; and there being no protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor. On motion by Bartlett, Council authorized the Street Superintendent to proceed with the abatement of the weed nuisance in the City. Motion carried . PUBLIC HEARING - MUD DUMP FACILITY - DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC NUISANCE Mayor McCracken announced that this was the day and hour set for the continuance of a public hearing from the meeting of March 22, 1971, for the purpose of receiving evidence that a public nuisance exists at the rotary mud dump located at the southwest corner of Magnolia ;street and Hamilton Avenue . The City Attorney stated that as Councilwoman Gibbs did not have the benefit of hearing the previous testimony introduced. before Council at the time the hearing was opened at Edison High School, she would not be entitled to vote on the matter . He stated that the action at this meeting would be to receive the report of the Environmental Council Mud Dump Committee, to mark it as an Exhibit and receive it in evidence, also to receive whatever other testimony it is the pleasure of the Council to have at this time, and if Council desires, to vote on the question. The City Attorney further informed Council that he had provided them with a suggested action which they might follow at their discretion. He stated that Mrs . Peggy Sword, a resident of the area, had contacted. his office on April 16, 1971, and that he had informed her that, if it was agreeable with the Council, :she would be heard. by Council at this time, together with any other witnesses they may elect to hear. At the direction of Council, the City Clerk recorded the report sub- mitted by the Mud Dump Committee of the Environmental Council as City Exhibit #11. Dr. James Mason, an organic chemist, Chairman of the. Mud Dump Committee of the Environmental Council, addressed Council and urged that the rotary mud dump be formally declared a public nuisance for the purpose of enabling the City to take action necessary to alleviate the condi- tion, and to allow the City a basis for negotiation with the mud dump owners . Mrs . Peggy Sword, 9092 Bobbie Circle, City, addressed Council and urged that action be taken immediately to halt further dumping at the site . Police Chief Rob itaille stated that there had been instances where the gate has been left open and this problem is intensified because of the lack of round the clock patrol of the mud dump site . Mr. William Carlson, Attorney for Steverson Brothers add.ressed Council concerning matters relevant to the subject which should be . considered at this hearing . - - Mr. Donald M. Buckland, 20711. Kiowa Lane; City, addressed Council and. stated that approximately 300 yards of the mud. dump is not fenced and T. - submitted pictures of the area for Council' s information. There being no one further present to speak on the matter and there being no further protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor. Page #15 - Council Minutes - 4/19/71 A motion was made by Councilman Coen that the City Council finds that a public nuisance exists at the mud dump at Magnolia and Hamilton in the City of Huntington Beach, and under Section 731 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the City Attorney is directed to bring a civil action in the name of the People of the State of California to abate such public nuisance, when further directed by Council; and that the City Attorney and City Administrator be directed to try to obtain voluntary compliance from Steverson Brothers , and report to the Council on June 21, 1971 - and until such time, the City Attorney shall not file said civil action. The motion was passed by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen: Bartlett, Green, Matney, Coen, McCracken NOES: Councilmen: None ABSENT: Councilmen: Shipley ABSTAIN: Councilmen: Gibbs ASSEMBLY BILL 1471 - COASTLINE DEVELOPMENT Councilman Green spoke regarding the introduction of Assembly Bill 1471 which proposes to prohibit any development along the California coast- ling extending 1000 yards inland . He suggested. that the city be repre- sented at the Assembly Sub-Committee hearing to present the city 's recommendation that the regional committees governing these matters be composed of persons from the affected localities . On motion by Matney, Council directed that Councilman Green be authorized to testify at the Assembly Sub-Committee hearing regarding this matter, with reasonable expenses allowed . Motion carried . ADJOURN14ENT On motion by Green, the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach adjourned at 11: 50 P.M. Motion carried . Paul C . Jones City Clerk and ex-off icio Clerk of the City Council of the City. of Huntington Beach, California George C . McCracken Mayor ATTEST: Paul C. Jones City Clerk 2 April 1971 TO: City Council City Administrator FROM: City Attorney SUBJECT : Mud Dump SUGGESTED MINUTE ACTION Move, in connection with Mud Dump matter, that City Attorney and Oil Committee are directed to investi- gate 'the legal and practical feasibility of enacting an ordinance which would require that all rotary my,r, and other oil bearing residues be cleared of all^^moil before removal from any oil production site;dfrep`drt from Oil Committee and City Attorney opinion to be received by Council within sixty days . Above suggested minute action prepared at request of Councilman Coen. Respectfully submitted, DON P . BONFA -� City Attorney DPB:bc 1 19 April 1971 TO: City Council City Administrator FROM: City Attorney SUBJECT: Mud Dump Suggested action--mud dump: Q � � MOTION `^ l p� `.- That the City Council finds that a public nui- sance exists at the mud dump at Magnolia and Hamilton in the City of Huntington Beach, and under Section 731 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the City Attorney is directed to bring a civil action in the name of the People of the State of California to abate such public nuisance when further directed by this Council. The City Attorney and City Administrator are di- rected to try to obtain voluntary compliance from Steverson Brothers, and report to the Council on June 21, 1971. Until such time, the City Attorney shall not file said civil action. Respectfully submitted, DON P. BONFA City Attorney DPB: ahb MINUTES Edison High School Cafeteria 21400 Magnolia. Street Huntington Beach, California Monday, March 22, 1971 Mayor Pro Tempore Matney called the regular adjourned meeting of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach to order at 7: 30 P.M. The Pledge of Allegiance was given by all present in the Cafeteria. ROLL CALL Councilmen Present: McCracken, Bartlett, Coen, Matney, Green Councilmen Absent: Gibbs , Shipley PUBLIC HEARING - MUD DUMP FACILITY - DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC NUISANCE Mayor Pro Tempore Matney announced that this was the day and hour set ' for a public hearing for the purpose of receiving evidence that a public nuisance exists at the mud dump located at the southwest corner of Magnolia Street and Hamilton Avenue, and for the possible direction by the City Council to the City Attorney, to take civil action to abate such public nuisance under Section 731 of the California Code of Civil Procedure . The Clerk informed Council that all legal requirements for notification, publication and posting on said public hearing had been met . Mayor Pro Tempore Matney then announced that the City Attorney would preside over the public hearing. The City Attorney called on Mr. Richard Harlow, Assistant Planning Director to give testimony on the matter. After being sworn by the City Clerk, Mr. Harlow presented a brief his- tory of the zoning of the mud dump property and displayed a map of the area depicting the tracts and neighborhood in relation to the dump . The City Attorney called on Mr. James Wheeler, Director of Public Works to give testimony on the matter. After being sworn by the City Clerk, Mr. Wheeler spoke regarding the possible technological means of alleviating or eliminating the problems connected with the mud dump facility. The City Attorney called on Mr. Gerald C . Bower, President of Cultured Chemical Division of Gerald C . Bower, Inc . , to give testimony on the matter . After being sworn by the City Clerk, Mr. Bower informed Council that his company is engaged in the bacteria control experiment being con- ducted at the mud dump and displayed two jars of sample material taken before and after chemical treatment of the mud dump . He stated that the chemical process being applied at the mud dump has been in use since 1966 and informed Council of its results in comparable areas . Discussion was held between the Council and Mr. Bower on the matter. 1 The City Attorney called on Mr. Herbert Day, City Oil Fielc Superintend- ent, to give testimony on the matter. After being sworn by the City Clerk, Mr . Day informed Council that his department had conducted 76 visual and odor inspections of the mud dump . He explained the County of Orange Air Pollution Control District Odor Classification Scale for Council 's information, and stated that Mr. Robert Davis, City Oil Field Inspector was present to discuss the inspections conducted by the Oil Department . C;o(Anc:i_:1. a The City Attorney called on Mr. Robert Davis, Oil l-'ield Inspector, to give testimony on the matter. After being sworn by the City Clerk, Mr. Davis addressed Council re- garding his written report of the mud dump inspections which were made during the past two months, stating that the odor predictions were taken at street level and ranging from a distance of twenty to fifty feet away from the mud dump . The City Attorney asked Mr. Davis to approach the table to verify whether certain written material was the report to which he had referred., and 14r. Davis verified that it was . On instruction from the City Attorney, the report was offered for examination to Mr. William Carlson, Attorney for Steverson Brothers, and then given to the City Clerk to be recorded as City Exhibit #1. Mayor Pro Tempore Matney directed that the report submitted by the City Oil Field Department be recorded as City Exhibit #1. Mr . William Carlson, Attorney, representing Steverson Brothers , directed several questions to Mr. Davis regard.ing the method of odor detection used by the Oil Department . Cour_cilman Green asked if the discussion was limited to the subject of odor nuisance only, or if facts regarding unsafe conditions could be introduced, and was informed by the City Attorney that any matter of relevance to the situation could be discussed . �� The City Attorney introduced Mrs . Jerome Juergens, 21671 Bahama Lane, City, a citizen-witness to give testimony on the' matter. After being sworn by the City Clerk, Mrs . Juergens stated that she had at various times smelled a very gaseous and terrible odor emitting from the mud dump and that animals in the area have returned to their homes covered with the mud dump wastes . The City Attorney asked Mrs . Juergens to approach! the table to verify whether certain material was the complaint form and questionnaire which had been submitted by her, and. she verified that it was . The City Attorney gave the material to the City Clerk to be recorded as City Exhibit #2, and the Mayor Pro Tempore directed that it be so recorded . __rs . Juergens was requested by the Council to examine the contents of two sample bottles and she stated that the smell of neither bottle :Tas similar to the obnoxious odor that she smelled when refinery oil is d .rr_?e d . Mr. Carlson questioned Mrs . Juergens regarding the odors smelled and. the fencing around the mud dump. At Mr. Carlson' s request, the Director oi' Public Works addressed Council regarding the Industrial Waste Disposal Permit No . 98-A, issued to the Steverson Brothers by the County of Orange Water Pollution Control Department on April 18, 1961. The City Attorney requested the City Clerk to record. the Industrial Waste Disposal Permit No . 98-A as City Exhibit #3, with the understand- ing that the original document be returned to Mr. Carlson when the City Clerk had made a copy of same . Mayor Pro Tempore Matney directed that this document be recorded as City Exhibit #3 . Tne City Attorney introduced Dr. James Mason, Organic Chemist, 9352 a.1;.=_ire Drive , City, a citizen-witness and Chairman of the Mud Dump or)-.''.rii+tee of the Environmental Council. Dr. Mason was then sworn by City Clerk. 'I'1, : (, i_ty Attorney stated that he wished to recognize the Environmental of Huntington Beach which helped in the investigation and pre- I)a..r.-i.tion 1:'or the hearing . Page #3 - Council Minutes - 3/22/71 • Dr. Mason addressed Council and stated that he believed the chemical treatment of the mud dump would probably destroy a large amount of the odor causing bacteria, however, the problem of the dump and its almost quicksand consistency would remain. He further stated that he knew of t:7o animals that wandered into the mud dump, one of which had to be destroyed . In response to a question by Councilman Green, Dr. Mason stated that on the day the worst odor occurred, the smell was more obnoxious from the second story of his home than on ground level. The City Attorney asked. Dr. Mason to approach the table to verify whether certain material was the complaint form and questionnaire which had been submitted by him, and he verified that it was . The City Attorney gave said material to the City Clerk to be recorded as City Exhibit #4. , and the Mayor Pro Tempore directed that it be so recorded . RECESS Payor Pro Tempore Matney called a recess of the Council at 9: 15 P.M. Council was reconvened at 9: 25 P.M. by the Mayor Pro Tempore . The Mayor Pro Tempore asked that Mr. Ernest Pascoe, Principal of Edison High School, and a citizen-witness give testimony on the matter. After being sworn by the City Clerk, Mr. Pascoe addressed Council regard- in•, the complaints of gaseous odors which. have been received from the students attending Edison High School . He stated that it was his opinion that the odors do occasionally reach the school. The City Attorney asked Mr. Pascoe to approach the table to verify whether certain material was the complaint form and questionnaire which had been submitted by him, and he verified that it was . The City Attorney gave the material to the City Clerk to be recorded as City Exhibit 7#6. Mayor Pro Tempore Matney directed that said material be recorded as City Exhibit #5. The City Attorney introduced Mrs . Susan Torkells , 9002 Bobbie Circle, City, a citizen-witness to give testimony on the matter. After being sworn by the City Clerk, Mrs . Torkells, ad.dressed. Council and stated that she lived on the street nearest to the mud dump site; that the obnoxious odors from the mud. dump were a constant nuisance, and that a family pet had. died as a result of wandering into the dump. The City Attorney asked Mrs . Torkells to approach the table to verify whether certain material was the complaint form and questionnaire which had been submitted by her, and she verified that it was . The City Attorney gave the material to the City Clerk to be recorded as City Exhibit #6 . Mayor Pro Tempore Matney directed that the material be recorded as City Exhibit #6 . The City Attorney then requested that Mr. Ora Wells, County Air Pollution Control District Investigator give testimony on the matter. After being sworn by the City Clerk, Mr. Wells, add.ressed Council re- garding the tests made by the Orange County Air Pollution Control Dis- trict on January 12 at which time the odor was rated as 4 on the class- ification scale . He stated that on January 15, 1971, a letter was sent by the County Water Pollution Control Office to Steverson Brothers Company stating that waste materials of the type found on the site were not permitted in accordance with Industrial Waste: Disposal :1ermit No . 98A issued to them on April 18, 1961, and that if materials other than those specified continued to be dumped on the site, the permit would be subject to suspension or revocation. In response to a question by Council, Mr. Wells stated that he did not believe any part of the odor was being emitted from the Southern California Edison Facility in the area. Pa:*e #4 - Council Minut6 - 3/22/'71 Councilman Green asked Mr. Wells if he had information to offer regard- ing the effect of the mud dump on the health standards of the area and T-- r. t-'ells stated that any determination of health hazards would have to be made by the County Health Department . At t:7e request of the City Attorney, Mr. Douglas Jeffery, Air Pollution Control District engineer was sworn by the City Clerk. Mr. Jeffery submitted a communication dated January 15, 1971, addressed to Steverson Brothers from the Water Pollution Control Engineer - Air Pollution Control District . The City Attorney requested the City Clerk to record the communication from the Water Pollution Control Engineer as City Exhibit #7, with the understanding that the original document be returned to Mr. Jeffery when the City Clerk had. made a copy of same . Mayor Pro Tempore Matney directed that this document be recorded as City Exhibit #7 . The City Attorney called. on Mr. Ralph Hansen, Deputy District Attorney, County of Orange, to give testimony on the matter. ; After being sworn by the City Clerk, Mr. Hansen outlined. the various alternatives to this problem which might be reached. by the City and Steverson Brothers Company. At the request of the City Attorney, Mr. William Carlson Jr. , Attorney, restated for the purpose of clarification, that he represents Steverson Brothers Company at this hearing. At this time the City Clerk submitted into evidence, written petitions Lhat had been filed with his office; informing Council that the signa- tures on the petitions had not been checked from a legal standpoint . The City Attorney directed that the petitions be accepted as hearsay evidence to be recorded as City Exhibit #8. The Mayor Pro Tempore directed that the written petitions be received as hearsay evidence, filed with the City Clerk and recorded as City Exhibit #8. The City Attorney then introduced the Orange County Air Pollution Con- trol District Complaint Forms and Questionnaires signed by 32 residents of the area to be recorded as City Exhibit #9. Mayor Pro Tempore Matney directed that the Complaint Forms and Question- naires be so recorded . After being sworn by the City Clerk, Mr. Carlson presented a brief summa- tion of the case for Council ' s information. N The City Attorney stated that he had supplied Council with copies of Mr. Ca.rlson 's letter dated March 19, 1971, outlining proposals for a solution that would be satisfactory to the City and the residents adjacent to the mud dump . Considerable discussion was held between the Council and Mr. Carlson regarding these proposals . The City Attorney called on Mr. Carl Steverson to offer testimony on i the matter . After being sworn by the City Clerk, Mr. Steverson addressed Council regarding the proposals offered by his company for a solution to the problem, including limiting the dumping of liquid oil field wastes to an area one-half the size of the present dump site . The City Attorney submitted the aforementioned communication written by William Carlson Jr. to the City Clerk to be recorded as City Exhibit #10. Page #5 - Council Mites - 3/22/71 The Mayor Pro Tempore directed that it be so recorded . Con,-iderable discussion was held between Council and the City Attorney regarding the way Council might wish to proceed in this matter. The City Attorney read the definition of a public nuisance as set forth in Section 731 of the California Code of Civil Procedure . A motion was made by Councilman Green that Council makes a finding of fact that a public nuisance does exist . When. voted upon, the motion failed to pass by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen: Green, Matney TOES: Councilmen: McCracken, Bartlett ABSENT: Councilmen: Gibbs, Shipley ABSTAIN: Councilmen: Coen A motion was made by Councilman McCracken to continue the public hearing on the matter to the meeting of April 19, 1971, but it was- withdrawn before being voted upon. A motion was made by Councilman McCracken that Council reconsider the-, action taken in the previous motion made by Councilman Green. When voted upon, the motion passed by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen: McCracken, Bartlett, Green, Matney NOES: Councilmen: None ABSENT: Councilmen: Gibbs, Shipley ABSTAIN: Councilmen: Coen On motion by McCracken, Council continued the public hearing on this matter to the meeting of April 19, 1971 at 7: 30 P.M. in the Council Chamber, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen: McCracken, Bartlett, Coen, Matney, Green KOES: Councilmen: None ABSENT: Councilmen: Gibbs, Shipley Mayor Pro Tempore Matney directed the City Administrator to insure that the appropriate staff reports are presented. to Council prior to the meeting of April 19, 1971. RECESS - EXECUTIVE SESSION Mayor Pro Tempore Matney called an Executive Session of the Council at 11: 55 P.M. to discuss pending litigation; called a recess of the Council and excused the City Clerk and appointed Councilman Coen to act as City Clerk for the balance of the meeting. COUNCIL RECONVENED Council was reconvened by the Mayor Pro Tempore at 12: 15 P.M. Ii,TEORMAL MEETING OF COUNCIL CALLED Mayor Pro Tempore Matney called an informal meeting of the Council as a Committee-of-the-Whole for March 29, 1971, at 7: 00 P.M. in the Council Chamber to meet with the Recreation and Parks Commission, the Park Naming Committee, Design Review Board and the Planning Commission. ADJOURNMENT On motion by Bartlett, the regular adjourned meeting of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach adjourned at 12: 15 P.M. Motion carried . PauI U . Jones City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, _ California ATTEST: Jerry A. Matney Mayor Pro Tempore Pau Jones City Clerk u; W E: CH UNION HIGH: ShC OL" DISTRICT APPLIC' & A.GREEMENT FOR USE OF SCHO �.FQGILITI,ES; DATE ku, 17 19 91-. ATE,:DOF APPLfCATMN ' st . THERE ARE'9 SECTIONS,TO�BE,,FILLED OUT ON THIS FORM READ.THEM .OVER CAREFULLY & .FILL OUT:THE.FORM COMPLETELY. ,, �_ ' SECTION�'1: -'-DATE OR DATES-REQUIRED'' -SECTION-7. SPECIAL EQUIPMENT REQUIRED;, (E.G: PROJECTOR, PUBLIC ADDRESS` SYSTEM) Meeting Dates):,. c ^aw Cleared by'Phone � 3� a� € ;� 4 .wi'th'.Principal :j a Date:dea red. 4. SECTION '2 FACILITIES REQUESTED ' CAMPUS:' HBHS WHS� MHS0;OTHER FACILITY y, ,. 1 e.• AUDITORIUM :� BASEBALL FIELD=� �,• J µ. CLASSROOM SOFT6ALL4FIELD .'� *CAFETERIA 'TRACK 0 tSECTlON^8.1. STPTEMENT OF'RESPONSIBILITYt =' --GYMNAS IUM;'�:��.C. ,�.TENNIS'-000RTS- -:;� "�I-HER EBY�CERTI F"Y1,THAT I SHALL •BE PERSONALLY RESPONSIBLE, ON BEHALF OF OUR ORGANIZAT ION_FOR ANY . ' ,,DAMAGE OR.UNNECESSARY ABUSE OF SCHOOLBUILDINGS, GROUNDS`OR EQUIPMENT GROWING OUT OF THE _ OCCUPANCY OF SAID PREMISES BY OUR ORGANIZATION.,'WE AGREE ITO ABIDE.BY:AND ENFORCE T"HE�RULES • POOL' _ ,� .,PROJECTION ROOM AND REGULATIONS OF,THE HUNTINGTON BEACH UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT,GOV,ERNING THE NON-S,GHOOL `� " " USE'OF'BUILDINGS, GROUNDS%ANDrEQUIP,MENT.AS,,PRINTEDtON THE REVERSE SIDE,OF-,THEE,APPUGANT'S"COPY ,�.ATHLETIC,,�, �. , t - - OF'THIS APPLICATION' ''" FIELD CONFERENCE'RobA �� ^ai - _ '-ri 'r' >>• _,.. wig - _ STADIUM NAME OF ORGANIZATION..Csi,��r'' `. IE"'A 'e�t1,cMFf_'. :,.9„:' ,' , *If kitchen.Jacilities of ,cafeteria are` used,rat least lone member of r af egular,ceferia,staff,must.be„present .1 r SIGNATURE�XLgj`.}x _a" -•r-��'d_ .^ "-d-.„' -4' ^"'=�T'. ' SECTION.3. TIME OF USE AD $' '� f FROM . R.M o ld' �. PHONE ... - _ P`.M K: CC ter• «5 ..� .t. Y Y, "7 S'ECTION'4 NATURE'1OF�TH-MEET"INGa�* c ' ��sn a a x ' � T P x ;�: ,'. - 0 : SECTION 9. ,STATEMENT OF'INFORMATION AS'REQUIRED:BY EDUCATION CODE NO. 16565 jr; T THE UNDERSIGNED STATESTHAT, TO THE BEST OF.HIS KNOWLEDGE The school p P Y pp Y tT � - ro ert"for.use of whlch a Ilcation Is hereb made`4ViI1 not"be`use. for, the 'SECTION 5 1EXP.ECTED ATTENDANCE' � -'_'' commission of any'=act-intended' to further* any"gip ogram ors'movement the wlu THE MEETING BE purpose of which is to accomplish the overthrow of. the Government.of the ,. OPEN,TO THE P„UBUC? YES"®: No� United States by'force violence or other unlawful means Y SECTION a6 WjLL-ADN11SS10 BE.Ck1ARGEDr `THAT+ ?:lk i0 '`kwAi Q�1 - " � "' ` „f{ieryor"anization oii:whose"tbeRalf i Eh s maIZ,g-a`'fication-on,Use;"of,'scho'. OR A.DONAT,ION:ACCEP.TED.~.*`^. 9,. w. ,rg; ,pp - c. - YES�NOY� :: 1 property does not; to-the best of 'firs knowledge, advocate the overthrow�of . IF YES,WHAT WILL THE PROCEEDS'.. = tfie`=Government of .the Uriited States or, 'of the State,of Callfornla,.by,:force, BE,USED FOR?',, violence, or other u6Iawful,means, and that, TOTHE"BEST.OF HIS KNOWLEDGE, . it;is not Communlst�frorit .organization required bylaw"to beegiste"red; with �- the;'Attorney General'of,..the United='States.' THIS ,STATENfENT IS'N1ADE UNDER " THE. PENALTIES OF' PERJURY. ° APPROVAL SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS LISTED BELOW >''- L.. I h Applicant hereby,agrees to hold the Huntington.Beach Uriion High School.'Distfict,,Th'e-Board of �T,rustees,tlie'i dividual members.'tFereof and all+District `Officers; Agents,_andgEmployees.free and j'harmless,ftom any loss; damage,-liak iliTy,icost or-expense that may.arise during-'or.beF ca°used'in any way by such use or occupancy of school property " Applicant likewise agrees.to hold the above-named free and=Karmless,from;'any:'loss,'.damage, 1 Irabilrty-;cost "or`t-expense that- may arise_through the non-availability,,;of;,, the'facility because of i't'necessary'school use or'an""act of:'God". ' BY �' r r ; .,c TITLE . 9.erk DATE PAID SECTION'?10.. APPROVAL'OF APPLICATION FEES$ -RECEIPT'NO. Deposit 5 .Cert..Check,No. x ' BY 4 t . ' i g et. a e WEC JOR OF SPECIAL"SERVICES BUSINESS o FIC - ISIGNATUPE - AND:RECREATION ,e,• .- ' PRESS HARD FIVE �COP�IES API?L,I.CANT S C,OPY ' BOARD RULES AND REGULATIONS 'GOVERNING THE-USE '�OF BUILDINGS, -GROUNDS AND EQUIPMENT FOR NON-SCHOOL PURPOSES _ HUNTINGTON BEACH UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 1. All applications from o u t s i d e organizations or 11. "No sectarian or denominational doctrine shall be groups for the use of school premises shall be made -taught or instruction thereon permitted, directly -or_. on official forms provided by the Huntington Beach indirectly,.in-any of the common schools-of-this Union High School District._ state." California Constitution, Article IX; Section-8.'. 2. These forms shall_ and mistreatment and ordinary precautions for be obtained at the district office 12. School property must be protected from damage and shall be filled out with the aid of a district cleanliness maintained.Groups shall be responsible employee. for the -condition in which they leave the 'school ' premises. In cases where school property has been 3. Completed forms shall- be left with- the Director of damaged beyond 'normal'wear, .the same shall be Special Services. A copy will be mailed to the paid for by the organization involved.. applicant after official action has been taken on the request.. 13. -.Use of school property shall be�-under the super- vision-and control of a duly authorized representa-_ 4. Application should be filed at least two weeks iii tine of the Board of Trustees.*It shall be his duty advance of the use of the premises desired. to see that these rules and regulations are enforced'' and report any violations or attempted violation to the District Superintendent. 5. Use of buildings, grounds and equipment for non- school There shall be no smoking in or about school build- school purposes shall be strictly in accord with Cali- fornia Education Code Sections 16551-16566. .Use ings, and premises nor shall intoxicants or narcotics' under the Civic Center Act is available only to or- be used, nor shall profane language, quarreling, ganizations; clubs, associations and group meetings fighting or gambling be permitted. for recreational, educational, political, economic, 1.5. If an admission fee is charged or contributions' or artistic, or moral purposes. Use of school buildings, dues are solicited and the net receipts are not used premises or facilities shall be denied if the group entirely for pupil welfare or charitable purposes, a or individual has as one of its objects the overthrow fee shall be assessed'for the use of school property.- or the advocacy of the overthrow of the present form In cases where the net receipts are to be used en-" of government of the United States or of the State tirely for charitable purposes, the application must by force, violence or other unlawful means. be accompanied by a letter from the charitable or- ganization.to which the receipts are to be given 6. If free use is granted,as provided in the Civic Center indicating their willingness to accept such funds. Act, the meeting shall be non-exclusive and shall he 16. Where a rental charge is made it shall be in Cori- open to the public.:._ formance with the schedule,adopted by-the Board of Trustees. This schedule is subject-to change at the 7. School premises shall not be available on such oc- will of the Board. All fees shall-be paid in advance casions or during such hour as.to interfere with the of appro.,val of Application directly to the Business regular functions of the school. Office. `8.. All-requests for'the use of.school premises•shall be 17• Persons-using any of school premises are cautioned denied where the proposed use is inconsistent with to obtain public liability insurance to protect them- the proper.and.regular use of the facilities or where selves from any claim that may arise from their "activities, as the.insurance of the Huntington:Beach the purpose of the meeting is immoral, obnoxious, or injurious. ' Union High School District covers only claims against the'District. 9. All.permits will be issued for specific ,groups .and 18. • .Sunday and holiday use of school property shall specific hour. It shall be the responsibility of the be prohibited, except by special permission granted organization to see that the unauthorized portions of by the Board of Trustees. All functions shall be ex- the building are not molested and that the premises pected to close not later than 12:00 midnight. are vacated as scheduled. 19. Putting up decorations or scenery or moving pianos or other furniture is prohibited unless special per- 10. All organizations or groups seeking use of school mission is granted and then only with the super- premises must designate an individual who shall be vision of the custodian 'in charge. held responsible- for-the group or organization, and • --who shall "be the person with whom the use.. of 20, .All electrical equipment and arrangements shall be school facilities is arranged.• .in.charge and control of the school authorities. ,__ -- _.----- --_ - --- ------ - - -- -- --- - ---- - - - - - - - - -- -------- --------�-_ C�.�, - ,_lam , -- _-- ----- opt_-. -- -- - _ �- ---------------------------- x C. WILLHfM CqD-LSon, jR. ATTORNEY AT LAW 1808 0 E3 EACH BOULEVARD HUnTInGTOil Hi;CH,CflLlFoQnifi 5.2646 TELEPHONE 847--2574 March 19, 1971 Donald P. Bonfa City Attorney City of Huntington Beach Huntington Beach, California Re: Steverson Bros. - Mud Dump Dear Mr. Bonfa: On March 22, 1971, a hearing is to be conducted by the City relative to our client's property at Magnolia and Hamilton, Huntington Beach. In the City arriving at any steps to be taken, I submit that certain facts need to be considered by the City Council . Some of these are as follows% 1. This property consists of sorwewhere under 40 acres and is presently used for industrial purposes. 2 . The property was acquired in 1950 by the principal stock- holders of Steverson Bros. , a California corporation. 3. Dumping that occurs at the site consists priimarily'Ilof liquid oil field wastes, i.e. , oil, oil mud and water from almost exclusively local oil fields. In this con- nection there has been a substantial reduction in dumping aur.kng the past five years. Using the period 1963-1966 as 'a base; &-n-., 1967 only 52.9% as much liquid wastes were dumped in the site. In 1969, this had decreased to, 48% of the base period and in 1970, there was a reduction to 35% of the base period. In each year since 1965 there has been a reduction over the prior year. 4. The owners ofthis property have made a vital contribu- tion to the economy of this community for many years. Ninety per cent of its employees live within the City of Huntington Beach. The re'al property taxes on the dump site alone for the current fiscal year amount to $8, 800.00. 5. The factors in converting the mud dump to a use other than its present one involve extreme economic hardship. The cost factors are unknown at this time. Donald P. Bonfa -2- March 19, 1971 The present plans of the owners of the property are as follows: 1. The primary objective of the owners is ultimately to convert the site to a use that is more compatible with the area surrounding the site. Possible uses may be a trailer park or recreational area because of its proxi- mity to the beach. The cooperation of the City of Huntington Beach would be expected in order to secure appropriate zoning to accomplish this objective. It is hoped that the technical problems can be resolved within a period of three years. 2. Immediate steps will be undertaken as follows: a. The owners propose to continue the work with the Dried Bacteria Culture presently underway. Because of the substantial costs involved, this work is being selectively carried on at this time. b. Sources of fill dirt in the magnitude of 180, 000 cubic ,,y,&'rds are being investigated. It is hoped that a definite commitment may be secured within the next six months. c. The owners propose to increase the present intensive "skimming operations", i.e. , to increase the rate of withdrawal of oil from the ponds. d. The owners propose to voluntarily limit future dumping liquid oil field wastes to an area one- half the size of the present dump site. The above proposals are made in the spirit of attempting to work out a solution satisfactory with the City and the property owners' neighbors. It is not intended to admit that a nuisance exists or that any violation of any law whatsoever has occurred in connection with the operation of the dump site. In fact, the existence of a nuisance or any violation of law is expressly denied. Very truly yours, C. WILLIAM CARLSON, Jr. CWC:jd cc: Steverson Bros. ` OFFICE MEMORANDUM To H. A. Day,. Oil Field Superintendent Date March 22, 1971 From R. C. Davis, Oil Field Inspector In Re Steverson Bros. Mud Dump, _ SW Corner of Hamilton St. & Magnolia St. During the past two months beginning from January 22, 1971 to present, I have made 76 visual and odor inspections of the Mud Dump listed above. Using the County of Orange, Air pollution Control District Odor Classi- fication as a guide, I was able to make these predictions. The odor pre dictions were taken at street level and. ranging from a distance of twenty to fifty feet away from the Mud Dump near the intersection of Hamilton and Magnolia Streets. Forty-nine days- No dectectable odor. jTwenty-three days - An odor that would ordinarily not be noticed by the average person, but could be detected by the experienced inspector or a very sensitive individual. Three days - An odor so weak that the average person might detect if his attentions were called to it, but that would not otherwise attract his attention. It was noted that on extremely warm afternoons the odor of the. Mud Dump was more prevailing than on other days. On five inspection days, 1/25, 1/27, 2/2, 2/5, 2/10, a strong sewage odor was detected during early morning hours near the intersection of Hamilton and Magnolia Streets. Upon my visual inspections I encountered the main gate opened fifteen different times, at which time the name and number of the trucks dumping were recorded. From this, 15 vacuum trucks dumping were operated by the Steverson Bros. and one independent vacuum truck was operated by Gilmore S Page. In conversing with the truck drivers about the material or liquids being dumped, most loads were from the local area ranging from rotary drilling mud from a Newport Beach operation to waste water from Standard Oil platform facilities in Seal Beach. Copies to: Don Bonfa Doyle Miller 11' 17 vt /yaws* G � � :�2Z 7/ /-Z.S-7/ 'rv1 Ji�rt/G 7' .oA ✓ N� — O r i—zs--7/ -�7 A4.fle o;/ XXa►a /-ZG-7/ Ale — I 7/ Sri✓try b�rUs 2 9 &Aor �y /►� I '-,7c-7 yt5/ A'2 6/i� c- zi jlws -15 Ive i-2R -7/ 1 7,-5-s / ✓ �n ` i—2,F-7/ /-29-71 Swat zl:;oo ,7•�s A' Itle 7:sS ✓le FJ�F 0 i 2-3-7/ rs►� e� au ` " �� . . ov on Z-5-7/ S i'Grss►r S Z7 Z.•3S�/�j 2-9-li yGrsar. yos l 2-7�s,C�6W}SHIn� Z:3s r g:on j/ �� X Ale, - JA :-J ewer PX-f,h/�udtivJ ea7 i 3:od pr.» ✓ /VD GAF /� BKts #27 z i7-7> �O AO- l-2 i — 7••S.s'.f'M _2 1/4- P,77 v NO .1-/9-7/ a-lf-71 / S ►- aL9 -a�-?/ 4017 lyD "c- 4 3:oo pm /L/o 2-7y/-71 ✓ t/ r s l ,(�� Off D a ..Poq 9-24--71 2 Z6-7/ Z;V-7 /91,1 Ho 3-Z-7i %��' �/l1 ✓ O D es 3-2-71 Sj�,�,-s... Bras Ab, z T�s"�''A Of 3:arpm l� Nlo Q�F D ar�fs�/r 9r gs A. Y /Ve O .�-3-7i 7. r--r _V-7� , 2: All" — I3R �/ /Vo Ive at',er i 3-ic-7i Bras 2X . O OAW5 �:err of�or► 3-i,r-71 J 3-iS�i 2''S�S .�lh � /Uc �ir •• 7;SC AM �TMLA �. _ .3-/7-�i Ile off' - s-7/ ?'So 3-is-7i 3-72 7.1 I n ram- , : _ ry g.. ' wT AIR POLLUTIOff CONTROL DISTRICT - COUNTY OF ORA14GE ENFORMENT DIVISIO14 ODOR CtASSIFICATIOW • V NU14ERICAL VALUE TERM DESCRIPTION I . 0 No odor No detectable odor. l Very faint An odor that would ordinarily not be ` noticed by the average person, but could be detected by the experienced inspector or a very sensitive individual. r. 2 Faint An odor so weak that the average person might detect if his attentions were called to 1t, but that would not otherwise attract his attention. 3 Distinct An odor of moderate intensity that would Easily noticeable be readily detected and night be regarded with disfavor. A possible nuisance in inhabited areas. f. 4 Strong An odor that would force itself upon the Decided attention and that might make the air very unpleasant (a probable nuisance, if found in inhabited areas). - 5 Very strong An odor of such intensity that the air would be absolutely unfit to breathe. ("Tana' to be used only 1n extreme cases.) 3 :,.. 1 (y R s .,x H _ � n F i .y-i >f.�ss �`••- +-.,53 h:5 �`i`ti{ w.{ir)k es_Lc� f r� r, KRIL'.,l a._�Y.`U'�►llLR7 ii. . . .. HATER_ POLLUTION.CONM3L,.DA0.PA$7ttS , . 1010 South Harbor Boulevard Arsaein. California Paoepect 4-0284: W11 ISO, 1961' IMSTRIA WASTE DISPOSAL.PURT �D 8-A OATS use 18 �� PT _..9t1.._MI Pursuant to Ordinance No$- 703 .of the County of Orange and all article mod section hereunder. an application has been received end-processed as wGVA%vd.by Braid O:dins%ice. Th6refors, a VareAt is..hereby granted to: whose wailing address is P. 0. Lox 335, Luntinaton beach, California, to dispose of Industrial waste .subject to provision& followings within the unincorporated exaaa of ttsfl Crnsnty a: Orange as €olloers: • said industrial vest* shall be limited to materials listed under 1�arngkraph 3, below: and point of discharge shall, be Stevertion Bros. disposal site located on Hamilton btreot bets Cannery and Howland Ste., Huntington Beach. Calif. All v4porte, letters and data pertaining hereto not shown on the face of this permit shall be cvnoidered apart of dais permit as if they were inscribed hereon. This permit is granted subject to the following provisions 1. This permit does not authorise any act or acts forbidden by any le, rules, regulations or orders. of any.public agency or county department. f. The provisions of this permit may be chsfaged, deleted or added to in accordance with Section 403, Sub-paragraph (b) and Section '104. 3. permissible diwping material& shall be Class ATE materials,. . except as otherwise specif ed - solid inert wastes,. all types of clay-bass rotary mud, and wa.Ste eater brines from oil well opera- tione only. Oil separetifia from materials dumped shall be sklowd off continuously. WMIAM YI=:M' Direitor Water Pollution Control Depsrtowt County of Orange oral #703 cos ld. To Stuns, Jr., Buec. Officer- Regional Water Pollution Control Bd. 08 Chas. W. Donahue, Superintendent Dept. ,Building [. Safety, o.smge County %;.t=liy'Ct •,ti';� $:; t- -yYt-.a:.r •Y.:' }t f:ti;:. t�i -E... .s t-_ - - F-c __' ' MIN .. _ _ _. 13 6! .zL�'.iiiS::� 1IsL•W , ''Y::.i:it .. _ - VATER`POLLUTION CDNMX a?.PARTM=i 1010 South ttarbor Boulevard ., Anaheim, California PRoopect 4-0Z84 April -0 -1961 IMMSTRIAL WA3'1'B DISPOSAL- PE MIT NO. 8-A co:p Y pATZ ISSvr�). x8 6I Pursuant to.ordinanee Nos 703 of the County of Orange sad all articles and sections hereunder, an application has been received emd processed as } z&gpired ;said Ordin►attiee. T ieroEors, a rperwit. to h6 reby granted to: %boas mailing address is P. O.rhox 335, L ntin,;tc u beach, California, to dispose of industrial date subject to provisions following within the unincorporated wroaas of. the County of orange as follomrs: -- said industrial waste shall.be limited to matertals listed under Pararvapb 3. below. and point of discharge- shall be Staveraon Bros. disposal site located on Namoiltoo streat between Cannery- and Mewlamd Sts., ttumtingtop Seethe Calif. All reports, letters and data pertaining-bereto not shown on the face of this permit skull be considered s part of this permit as if they were inscribed herreon. This permit'€e granted subject to the folloieing previiioosl 1. This permit does not eutborue any act or acts forbidden by any lmv. rules. reE;ulations or orders of any public agency or county department. Z. The provisions of this permit may be changed, delated or added to in accordance with Section.403, Sub-paragraph (b) and Section 104, 3. Permissible dtwping materials shall be Class III zaterials$ except as otherwise specified • solid inert wastes, all types of clay-bass rotary uud, and waste -water brines gran veil well opera- tioue only. Oil separating from materials dumped shall be skinowd off continuously. WMIAH FITC1:Et1., Director Water Pollution Control Departwent Canty of 0 VMS® Ordinance 0703 ces D. V. Stooge .dr., sec. Offices Regional dater Pollution Control Bd.- 88 Chas. W. Donahue, Superintendent Dept. Building C,. Safety, Orange' County `a r- '•. jP: , v+ G-' -- 3 i:;�y.• :;.•:f.i - -win "F 1 i -,x .ed'S�}v;,.•4 3=' i;:•?:i}t — Y _ '' 1� - e'ii s •c%i£•:r�=i:r:e 3 i 3 .•• . . . • - iiie:e: •iair'ie:IiirS:: _ L:i:t se :i?3a' L :s`ii COUM Vi TBA I OLUF ION CO2ML .'M..PARTKEN '. 1010 South-Harboi.8oulevatd Anaheim, .Califoriiia Mospect.;44'0284 A001 ::-la, i961 :- IiMOluAL WASTt DISPOAAL FMMT W. DATE UStlSD l8 6l � P lursuant .to ordinanee No.' 703•of the Dainty_ of Orange. and all articles and sections' hereunder, an application has been ter®ived and processed ew . . v6quired by maid ordinsuce. Thorofore, a nervAt- is. hereby granted toe !mr4 whose mailing eddreas is P. 0. _Dox J35, .huntinatgn .beeach, California, to dispose of ind4striesl waste subseact ,to provisions following within the unincorporated .areas of _tho Countv' o: Orange as follows: - . said industrial- waste shall be limited. to.materials- listed under Para rspb J, below: 'end . :poigt of discharge shall bs..�;tevemon Bros. disposal-site located on Hamilton streat betw=o Cannary.:and,owlaad Ste:., Huntington Beach, Calif. All reports, let ters.- mAd. .data pertaining hereto not shown on the fate of this Permitshell be:tmsidered'a pest of this permit as if they were insezribed hereto. . Yhia• permit fi : giented subject-::to the following Provisions 1 This permit does not autfiariso sing act.' or'acts .forbidden by any law, rules, regvlatiodo.or orders, of. ank public: agency or county department. 20, The provisions of this .permit usy be ching4d, deleted or added to in accordance with Section 403,: Sub-perasraph (b) and. Section 104. - 3. permissible doumping materials shalt be Class.M materials, except an otherwise spocif:e3d- = solid ineirt wastes, all types of clay-base rotary mud, and. wcsti water brisees from oil well opera- tioas only. Oil separating from materials dumV*d shall be skimtmsd off continuously. WIMIAM 12TCIM, Director Water Pollution Control Deortmsent County of Orange Ordinance #703 cc1. B. V. Stone, Jr., Emm. Officer Regional Vater Pollutiou Control Bd.. 08 Chas. W. Donahue, Superintendent Dept. Building Safety, Orange.Countq. iee',ef'l.�.aii=:�:?'. _;=t9:i::.::: fiP COUIM OFOaAMM i1AT8R. FOLLUTI6�1 CO"RML:;UPTASTliM' -10i0 South Harbor Boulevard -Andheita, Celifornia F3oe.pect,4-0284 .. April 180 lsbl zMmsTata WASTE DISPOSAL .PBMT NO: 6-A DATB 19SUM) 18 Furs mt to Ordinance No.. 703 of the Camay �of'OtsnBs sod all srticlea and sections hereunder, an application has boar received and processed as - wi-4 tjized by said Ordinatsce. .`Tuerofore, a. permit is hereby granted td: rl.!Is.. Co.. wbose mailing address is P. .O. Dox 335, Luntinaton bench, California, to dispose of .induatrlel waste subject to..presvIsLone 1 fa1.loving within the . unincorporated araas of the Coutity of Orange as €ollcrws: - said. industrial waster shall be limited to materials listed under Paragraph 3, below; and point of discharge shall be Staverwm Bros. d1spos4 .site located on Hamilton strut be,twaa Camery wd Newland Ste. , Huntington Beach, Calif. All reports, letters and data pertaining hereto not shows on the face of this permit shall be toasidered a..pert of. thus' permit as if they were inscribed hereon. This permit is grerated subject to the; follo'vinS provisions 1. This permit does not. outhorieey any act or acts forbidden by any law, rules, regulatimal or orders of any public agency or county department, 3. The provisions of. this permit may be chmged, deleted or added to in accordance with Section 403,' Sub-paragraph (b) and section 104. 3. permissible dtwping materials shall be Clase '11I materials, except as otherwise specified - solid Inert Wastes, all types of clay-bsaea rotary mud. an3 wczte eater brin*e frtxa oil, well opera- tions only. Oil sepa:retina from materials- dumped shell be skimad off continuously. W1U1 ►X F1TC11M, Director Hater Pollution Control Depart t Cotmty of Orange Ordinance 0703 cat R. V. Stone, Jr., Bx". Officer Regional grater Pollution Ccsctrol 'Sd, f8 Chas. W. ]Donahue. Superintendent Dept. Building b Safety, Orange County March 16, 1971 Mr. James Mason 9352 Malahine Drive Huntington Beach, California Dear P4r. Mason : This is to confirm your attendance 6t the hearing re the rotary ir:ud dump set for March 221, 1971 at Edison high School in Huntington Beach.. It may be necessary for you to testify with some of your neighbors regarding the common problem you face. Your attendance will contribute to the resolution of this issue. Thank y,ou. Very truly yours , DON P. DONFA City Attorney BY MICHAEL H. MILLER Deputy City Attorney lv[hM/c c j I f 6 I I� I i I i n (T p VIrj ), l j[ V-1, G".I I F Oram, I A U NUISt' I 0_ rOPIPLAINT FORN Date- CAurce com-11 11.1ame Mud Du_,Ta-� U s a i n e d of: ) 71 o r , Y Address Corner of T-Tcar-lilton -.rd Ma=olia ,%venucs, Phone 2. Coriplainant: N a me jai-n.es ia. �masori JNo. 962-7974 Ype) liow long 3. Home AUMMSS 93-52 there e.-..-r s- TV�int or How long 4. Business Address B,_-z_cL_,_Ca1if_ JL-.here 6 yocr.9 (Vr i n-f-O-r Ty pe 11 5. Approximate distance from source 1 Mile J2_ . G. Wind direction when nuisance occurred, circle. "4 (L) S W 7. Dates and hours nuisance occurrrC(t�T!L-.-uLr Tan. 1.3 ,1971 0 0 D' to 6 :00 S. Nature of nuisance conDlained of, circle. Smoke, charred paper, dust, soot, gas grime, carbon, acid, odors. (oti�er 9. Have you observed the above-described emissions coming from the source complained of? Ye S 10. Have you or any member of your household become ill from the nuisance? ve's, If "yes", t�.lho? _jmjrs. fl . Describe nature of 12. How is your home address ResiLd- Icl Re-z iderit-i a'!* Coim.,,Tierc i a 1 or Planufac-turing) 13. Has the property at thicS 1, t1he � u-sanczl? deprec-'at-ed in value due �o I! Probabl v 44. Stat.- any dmige done 'Co .—C�u',, propertly, furnit,ure, auto.-mobile, Cloo'c"MriC, etc. Y 0 1., a or.,e a r in No Sic"'aturr. C11:, "7 S, Th4s s-vere od-or tvar, a,,Dr,)are-:tj,.y a •ono-inne occurance -- ---------- --------- e7,q+s a n.parly qc..,,r-j.r,,q -us o(j-or of cru,�c oil ., and v:e 'eel durin 0 ---------- - F . - . t -i �e� - a-T�ts_ f --. id � i c: _3aK ' 0 h CS n, rjf.j cilde c 4 4 nac� cs!d ad -s— c U. i -c-o q� r o.1 J_c QUESTIONAIRE MUD DUMP AT CORNER OF HAMILTON AND MAGNOLIA AS A PUBLIC NUISANCE 1. Name and address of person interviewed. James W. Mason 9352 Malahine Drive Huntington Beach, Calif. 92646 2 . How long in the neighborhood? Six Years 3 . How are you bothered, if at all, by the so—called mud dump? Generally the odor of the place, and specifically by the very bad odor the-. evening of January 13, 1971. 4 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way affect your health? Not on a continuing basis, but it made my wife quite ill on January 13, 1971, and occasionally since then she has had sinus trouble which seems to be connected with the odors from the mud dump. 5 • Does the existence of the mud dump in any way offend any of your senses , e.g. , smell? Inzaddition to the odors, the place looks terrible, and we are worried about the possibility of our children or pets .getting into the dump •and being injured or killed. It is not properly protected by the fence there, and I know of several instances when the gate has been left open.and unattended. 6 . Does the existence of the mud dump obstruct the use of your prop- erty or in any way interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of your life or property in this neighborhood? How? As outlined above. 7 . How frequently does the condition of the mud dump affect you or bother you? Three or four times a month. 8. How long has the mud dump had a derogatory effect on your life in this neighborhood? As long as we have been here. It has always smelled bad, and occasionally, as on January 13, 1971, it has caused some health problem. 9 . Have any of your neighbors expressed discontent with the existence of the mud dump? How many? At least twenty of them have expressed a dislike for the place, and many of them have filled in this questionabre. However, it must .be realized that the dump -was there long before we were. Most of my neighbors are not advocating putting the dump out of business, but rather cleaning up the odors and doing a better job of lOpr s ct neg ehariy hirig e'�s�eyou resod c t�11 o add regarding this matter? My personal feeling is that the dump has about lived out its usefullness, and perhaps it should be closed down by the owners. However, this will not solve the problems of odor and danger to choldren and pets. Whether the City can take it over and solve these problems is also questionable. However, if the odors can be stopped, an t lace pro ro ect d, I ee n aso wh it could not co inue to operate. 11. i lace be �a�� - g tto esti 'y a� she ieaTing on March H, regarding this matter? Yes. 2. March 16 , 1971 Mr. & Mrs . Jerome Juergens 21671 Bahama Lane Huntington Beach, California Dear Mr. & Mrs . Juergens : This is to confirm your attendance at the hearing re the rotary mud dump set for March 22 , 1971 at Edison High School in Huntington Beach. It riiay be necessary for you to testify v,rith some of your nei&hbors regardinn- the common problem you face. Your attendance will contribute to the resclution of this issue . Thank you. Very truly yours , DON P. BONFA City Attorney BY MICHAEL 11. MILLER Deputy City Attorney Md--"M C c (-j:IA .Y U CO,UP i.T I T P-P71. Jan. 31, 71 sourle Coir.- jlla€,ie Steverson Rotary TVIud Damp 1 . ulainied of- or�U' V De Add r e s E Hamilton Aveand Miagnilia, Hunt" Bch -i (r7 P hone 2. Complainant: Natie Jereme P. Juerg_ns � io. 9 68-1865 _T67nj_3. Ty Viere yrs. Home Address— 21671 Bahama Lane Hunt Bch ........... r i mc or i y p in) n 4. Business AddreSS__AA;_es.-!.ern Airline Los Angeles there 13 yrs . er-ont or T%:F�_T Approxim.ate distance from source--_ 2 blo c ks 6. Wlind diretction w ,en nuisance occur re-al, ci-cle. 7 Dnil_-es and hours nuisance: occurrred— Jan. 12, ._q971 Lame Evening 9-10 S. Na+u* nu isarce rC1.1.-IV'.I�JnerjI Of. e of circle. Sticflke charred ppaper dust, soi ca.,rbp. , acic] (other .9. �!ave you observet] -Z'.he above-describez! -Crom tlie source QUI,P I 11 -0 10. llaLe you or any n.1,,mber i `1 from, Vhe nuisance? if "Yes", ]I . DescriLbe nature o-IF 111ness N V 12. limpi is your kmme atJdress zoned? _ :zes1.deo1,ii-3: a C o c i a! I- a-, L,f a C11-u r n .3. iias Vie property at this Pe-dress dleopeciated In �:a],-%Ae due ILo `,10 1 St 4. at any damage done to P,-r-eirty. flurn-i-f-u-T,e, 2-1-on-bi'le r-' - e - Y You 0 ji -a i :j A p DFt 5-ource cc.1ii-) iNlaMe S7-a ilelf S 0 k1 v I planed int or Tvpe� Address Hamilton and �,"Iagn01`ia, Hunt . Beach Dh on r-, 2. roF..jplainant: 'iar-le Jerome P. Juergens jjo. 56$-1805 How—Tco—n--- 3. Homxe Address 21671 Bahama Lane Hunt . Bch. t?-,e-. e Z yrs . vr-iric or i ype) Ho,.-.f long 4. Business Address s t e r n Airlines Los Angeles there 13 yrs. 0 -A or, -1y'..'e), 5. Approximate distance lf-'rc-ai source- 2ilocks 6. W'ind d-erection t-Aion rwis1--.znce occurred, circ-le. N r $ N1 Afternoon and 1 . Dates and I' ours nuisance occurrred- Jan. 26 , 1971 Evening 3— ? A. N t--ure of viuisanc.e co T, c C -red p a n ed a I Smog:?, c'F!i, app-er, dus t solot, rime, ce.r bo n acid, o t 1h.e r Have you obsedrved -he &"i S S i ons cor-inq fir-m 1-;iije s: -c- r-Cr p u,, 2 com 160. Have you or any r-* your hpuse io'U -111 from, tl-ie rut- ? X,if "Yes" vil o? U-K I! . Describe n-:�ture of i I s '12. How is your home address zoned? Residential — �it; ,'denti a-i , Comm,-,�rcia, or "anu`actui-�ftg 13. 1-I-as t1le property at Viiis address depreciated in %,alue dwe to Itihe nuisance? A 44. S-Iate an y damage done to vow, property' ., furniture, clot1iing, etc. court !:D X- Y, 17. NO Ct. ........... i QUESTIONAIRE MUD DUMP AT CORNER OF HAMILTON AND MAGNOLIA AS A PUBLIC NUISANCE 1. Name and address of person interviewed. 2. How long in the neighborhood? 3. How are you bothered, if at all, by the so-called mud dump? 9 4 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way affect your health? 5 . Does the �istence of the mud dump in any way offend any of your senses , e.g. , smell? 6 . Does the existence of the mud dump obstruct the use of your prop- erty or in any way interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of your life or •property in this neighborhood? How? 7. ow frequently does the condition of the mud dump affect y �or bother you? 8. How long has the mud dump had a derogatory effect on your life in this neighborhood? �aJ� t 9 . Have any of your neighbors expressed discontent with the existence of the mud dump? How many? 10 . Is there anything else you would like to add regarding this matter? 11. Will you be willing to testify at the hearing on March 22, regarding this matte? 2. L Ltll Y 171 -5-fe v epns-ej Pe' 07"AIE)l �Qjlz -2 I a i n(�d o 17: j -fir --X i n. �i r Ab�7 To 4) Ph one L. Complainant: Now �-�L_.�(G^- 3. 6_7 Home AdIdress th e re Y-In"C iype) How 3ong simess Address_g 4. 'L 0 a- -_. th+* ere int or TypeT 5. Appy,oXirnate distance from source 6 6- 'W"Ind direction wher, nuisance occuirt-ed, ci-rcle. N f- S Cw 7. Dates and hours rluisancil:% occur. rred B. Na-u'ce cmn i ned ro Ci e- sance 4-1�ni- CfhC-:-' n-d pape,,-, dust, soot, O-ime, carbon acid., -(C.- 9 F1'ave you ob-served the abovc-dpscribed cominArom, e1c.."A"ce Complained, Of? ��rr I'lave you or, any membe-,- of your becorl' il' from the, ni--Osancet? If "ves", wlhto? De-sc-dibe nature of Miness 2 How is your home address zoncul' �—fI Co es fli g) 13.- lllf��s the pmperty at tlhi,:: r, ia co, -in va' ue du, S a j s de e C t I an ri-noe v da done to ror;p �--r-b, autoriicbile, C-10th r.,-jr. E-L- 21-�111'.-Z-11.. 15. N. f No , 16 S IN rT-,['/ rr "PI N ",!:. Likiii; romt C, -21 -Source corn-) i plai . �Print -or lyp-ej Add 2. Complainant: Name Ph 0 n NO-- TP )r tYpt How long 4/u IqI4 3. Home Address__,;_,, 7-1-414 there A Business Address 'Sype) HOW !-6-in-g there S. n or ia Approxiima'e distance from sour�e,-2--fe-4:.0-C-1-�� 6. Wind direction when nuisance occurt-ed, circle. 9 (z tiJ7. Diates and I%-)Lrs nuisance occurrrcd 71 g. f n L .r`iAined of, circle� $moloa, charred. p�4 N.?Ature o isanCe con -P us soot, Ga's, c 7,me, carL;,on, acid, 'Pid'O.""s (o th.-r 9. Have you obserwd tine afbove-Cfescrilbed ernissions, coming from tlhe source comp lained. Of? 10. Have you or an...! --,b,,r olf yow, househo id becorne ill fron-Ath.e 40 sia/nce,? 4-Z�-z--Z� if yes",, -wh o? iris c. 4 11 . Describe wn .4i v,r e- o'1 41 1!;-less 12. How is Your home address zoned? vlci s i d e n t i a I C otum-, c rE-i,v-d 7.----—1a cat EiFiri. 4- 13. Has tie propert`,' at this address detireciated in valuie due 0 the M.-isance? St�ne 3 Ey d zminz g e- d o in e t o y o u r p r-,-. f vrn i twrc- a uto.mobi I e, c I oth i r,g etc 15. 1W,i I I Y o I S No 16. Siqm,1,LLUf G G L. CIP ;7. CCIM; .. ............. I NC D7 ------------ March 17, 1971 Mr. Ernest F. Pascoe, Principal Edison High School 21400 Magnolia Street Huntington Beach, California Dear Mr. Pascoe : This is to confirm your attendance at the hearing re the rotary mud dump set for March 22, 1971 at Edison High School in Huntington Beach. It may be necessary for you to testify with some of your neighbors regarding the common problem ,you face . Your attendance will contribute to the resolution of this issue . Very truly yours , DON P. BONFA City Attorney BY MICHAEL H. MILLER Deputy City Attorney MHM/c c,j i I I i f w .-t ';, , Tanuary 20 , 1.971.... ... - - ` Edison High School 21400 Magnolia Street, Huntington Beach 962-1356 _ P, ;:; Mr. Ernest F. Pascoe , Principal 962-1356 . ... ,. .:!•..: ....._,, . :::• above ._ _--- --- - • .r-- ,t�; one oc,c Afternoon of 1/1 /71 ;:5. �•� ,.-„ [.:. i?1-!�' �%� r-;�,':.�'_:� Ii(�:�� «.'�- i';-i,`:, ...., j�'•ii:!-.i. aitt 3"!'::� r�!:j�Y•T .,,.._ � t .ci;o� ':?C .14 l+ ,, _. 'j,r._'.,Y'•'ti * :ifi%:.r�[. .fli.. :�:; _ `:..il":i; t�f,.., Y.i . SSr no ,: !'t4 _ i..'. �a?i - _ .,'.>r'i; s�i7 �f't.!•i,"i�� ! .�iJ}i1 t.. i i tit' ..._ ..__.-.._.__..__._._.—..._—___.._._.._. - ;Ct.,, yr•.as' )iCt:c` ;Fi,•yr ;i^sat; NA - - - ---- _--- aF:-^ Eval {.i�'�1�3`? F`S.�•i'�' ii i` iU':i:,: 3i.t.? ;ipr'_ :le r ii>.:_(� t ? /=S.Sut'� %:.t... Co vr! iil.:i Ce.)i:tC~ ... .i�...'.a�,3 e t r •.S.i:?i'., i� ..'.4 a .. _ .. •, .1.t: Y 14 r; `i - I1: i� , :f_:. iIt• -• };_��i:ij'. - 9 t,. ' ]1.�� �: l..�.___..r_._.....__...-_.--•-_ -... f.` r n.. .t; x iy{tt.7 tiir.. U i o.:.:it.;: �:i Y!7,1 L. ...... ._ ..�- �------- -_ ... .....---.._.__.-�__.. ----' - -•---'-•---._.__._..._...._� i :' _ i.,tii?ij;iCa�±f•i.:i;L• -Lat'rp ".C_; n n -._•._-_-._.Odor of.numerical value. ,. .decided.,.very.unpleasant March 16 , 1971 Ms . Susan Torkells 9002 Bobbie Circle Huntington Beach , California Dear Ms . Torkells : This is to confirm your attendance at the hearing re the rotary mud dump set for March 22, 1971 at Edison Iligh School in Huntington Beach. It may be necessary for you to testify with some of your neighbors regarding the common problem you face. Your attendance will contribute to the resolution of this issue. Thank you. Very truly yours , DON P. BONFA City Attorney MICHAEL H. MILLER Deputy City Attorney ivild,M/C c j mil& 7/ eel QUESTIONAIRE MUD DUMP AT CORNER OF HAMILTON AND MAGNOLIA AS A PUBLIC NUISANCE 1. Name and address of person interviewed. 2. How long in the neighborhood? G 3. How are you bothered, if at all, by the so-called mud dump? 4 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way affect your health? s ��:Q:,C,G�2.eO� 5 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way offend any of your senses , e.g. , smell? a-"Ll , 6 . Does the existence of the mud dump obstruct the use of your prop- erty or in any way interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of your life or property in this neighborhood? How? 7 . How frequently does the condition of the mud dump affect you or bother you? 8. How long has the mud dump had a derogatory effect on your life in this neighborhood? 1. +- Ni .9 . Have any of your neighbors expressed discontent with the existence of the mud dump? How many? L C� 10. Is there anything else you would like to add regarding this matter? s ��✓ �,,��,,,, eta.. e�-a� 11. Will you be willing to testify at the hearing on March 22, regarding this matter? � . 2. stV,"._ CUU,i, , },srr �';...Lu I CY',lt,�.;� i • NUS" CE CGINnLAiNiT FUwl you rce com-) Nam � . plained of: ) (Print or 'type, I` Address 2. Comp la?nurt: Name�S�S���'1�S=�1_C� ��C�.�1�� , No. � 3��._. (1' nt or 1-ype) How Song Home address�_CLQ� Y�Cab _L�__Cat 1�-j_� L�CY� l- k[_.c k there 5Va. y ears {-!odd long - 4. Business address p there 5. ."proximate distance from source, 5. :link- direction when nuisance occur--red, circle. /l E S ?. Dates and hours nuisance occurred �C�C�a ��L__M°`�-�—ci 7 Q �3 iS u i s_o_.o...t , `pa ieFt r � L r . F , S '" f -laG= , calrbon, acid, odors. (other 9. Have you observed the abov--described eimi55ions cmipm -?"rom the source complained wF?�_ 1G. rave you or any nember of y:,ur houselhold becon;e '111 f:-om t17e nu' lance? I'f °yes", t..ho? 11 . Dcscr ibe nature of i11neS5 -1={��C��lc� Y_�2 ��C'_ �C � 12. How is your home address Zoned _ _�f' ?5��•�J �A�k — (Residentia s , Coimmi1ercia l or i lainu elctur'li4) U. Has the pi^oper';_-y at this address depreciated ?n v.-lue due to the nuisance? 14. State any dari-age done. to your property, 'furniture, aUi.oMrbili'a clothing, e-tc-�_-- —_-- G Cs r CCI. �. i � _�_G -i S_L xsk � `e, rc��2 S�.�Cif 15. Will you appear in court to test i iy? Yes (Vt ri10 i 16. Signature o3 compl ai nun� I,Married �o:man t ulc usP hc, !7. Complainant's remarks _ D _��J— - 0.�✓V,�✓�Q r� No" f CE iNsprEcror. NO. 7 j Compliments of - ` ASSFIABLY?,BAN ROBERT H. BURYt 70th District Assembly Bill No. 2209. CHAPTER 1076 An act to add Secdon 1016 to.the Fish and Came Code, and to add Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 3780) to Division 3 of the Public Resources Code, relating to oil. [Approved by Governor October 1, 1973. Filed with Secretary of State October 1, 1973.] LEGISLATIVE.COUNSEL'S DIGEST AB 2209, Karabian. Oil sumps. Requires the State Oil and Gas Supervisor to promulgate rules and regulations for the adequate screening of oil sumps, as defined, to protect wildlife and to order the closure of any oil and gas production operation maintaining an exposed or inadequately screened oil sump in violation of such rules and.regulations. Requires the supervisor, upon receiving specified notification from the Department of Fish and Game,to give written notice of oil sumps hazardous or immedi- ately dangerous.to wildlife to the owner,lessee,operator,or person responsible for the existence of such condition,and to take action,as specified, to have a hazardous or immediately dangerous condition cleaned,up or abated. Requires the supervisor to submit annual.re- ports to the Legislature, as specified. Authorizes the department to make specified determinations re oil sumps hazardous or immediately dangerous to wildlife and requires the department to notify the supervisor of such conditions.Requires the department to promulgate rules and regulations to implement such provisions,and expresses legislative intent.Requires the depart- ment to submit annual reports to the Legislature, as specified. Requires the supervisor and the department to develop a joint program to coordinate their respective responsibilities under such provisions. Declares that such provisions shall not be construed as a limitation on the authority and responsibilities of the supervisor and the depart- ment with respect to the enforcement or administration of any provi- sion of state law which the supervisor or the department is authorized or required to enforce or administer. q The people of the State of California do enact as follows.- SECTION 1. Section 1016 is added to the Fish and Game Code,to read: 1016. (a) Whenever the department determines that an oil sump, as defined by Section 3780 of the Public Resources Code, is hazardous to wildlife, but does not constitute an immediate and grave danger to wildlife, the department shall forthwith notify the Ch.1076 —2— —3— Ch.1076 State Oil and Gas Supervisor of such condition in order that he may the satisfaction of the supervisor and the Department of Fish and take action pursuant to Section 3783 of the Public Resources Code to Game.If the owner,lessee,operator,or person responsible does not have such condition cleaned up or abated. clean up or abate the condition to the satisfaction of the supervisor (b) Whenever the department determines that an oil sump,as and the..Department of Fish and Game within the required period defined by Section-3780 of the Public Resources Code,constitutes.an of time,the"supervisor shall forthwith order the closure of the.oil and immediate and grave danger to wildlife, the department shall gas.production operation maintaining"the oil sump. forthwith notify the State Oil and Gas Supervisor of such condition 3784. Whenever the supervisor receives notification from the in order that he may take action pursuant to Section 3784 of the Department of Fish and Game pursuant to subdivision(.b)of Section Public Resources Code to have such condition cleaned up or abated. 1016 of the Fish and"Game Code that an oil sump constitutes"an (c) The department shall promulgate such rules and regulations immediate and grave danger to wildlife, he shall forthwith give as are necessary to implement the provisions of this section.It is the written notice of such immediately dangerous condition to-the intent of the Legislature that the department.adopt,as apart of such owner,lessee,operator,or person responsible for the existence of the rules and regulations,a definition of the term"wildlife,"as herein condition.-The owner,.lessee,operator,or person responsible shall, employed,which will provide for reasonable exclusions consistent "within 10 days from.the date of such notification, or such longer with effectuating the wildlife protection purposes of this section. period as may be mutually agreed upon pursuant to Section 3784.5 (d) The department shall submit a report to the Legislature of its by the supervisor,the Department of Fish and Game,and the owner, actions taken pursuant to this section on or before March 1st of each lessee, operator, or person responsible, clean up or abate the year,commencing with March 1,1975. condition to the satisfaction of the supervisor and the Department of (e) No provision of this section shall be construed as a limitation Fish and'Game.If the owner,lessee,operator,or person responsible on the authority or responsibilities of the department with respell does not clean up or abate the condition to the satisfaction of the to the enforcement or administration of any provision of state law supervisor and the Department of Fish and Game within the which it is authorized or required to enforce or administer. required period of time, the supervisor shall forthwith order the SEC..2. Chapter 5 (commencing with Section.3780)-is added to closure of the oil and gas production operation maintaining the oil Division 3 of the Public Resources Code,to read: 3784.5. Extension of the 10•day period specified in Section 3784 CHAPTER 5. OIL SUMPS may be granted only in cases where the supervisor and the Department of Fish and Game have determined that screening or 3780. As used .in this chapter, an "oil sump" is any "open elimination of the oil sump cannot be reasonably accomplished depression or basin in the ground, whether manmade or natural, within.10 days. which contains oil or a combination of oil and-water. 3785: The supervisor and the Department of Fish and Game shall 3781. The.Legislature hereby finds and declares that it is essential develop a joint program to coordinate their respective in order to protect the wildlife resources of California that all responsibilities under this chapter and Section 1016 of the Fish and exposed oil sumps in this state be either screened or eliminated. Game Code to protect the wildlife resources of the state from the 3782. The supervisor shall promulgate rules and regulations for hazards of exposed oil sumps. the adequate screening of oil sumps to protect wildlife and shall 3786. The supervisor shall submit a report to the Legislature on order the closure of any oil and gas production operation maintaining the administration and enforcement of the provisions of this chapter an exposed or inadequately screened oil sump in violation of such on or before March 1st of each year,commencing with March 1,1975. rules and regulations. 3787. No provision of this chapter shall be construed as a 3783. Whenever the supervisor receives notification from the limitation on the authority and responsibilities of the supervisor with Department of Fish and Game pursuant to subdivision(a)of Section respect to the enforcement or administration:of any_provision of 1016 of the Fish and Game Code that an-oil sump is hazardous to state law which he is authorized or required to enforce or administer. wildlife, he shall forthwith give written notice of"such hazardous condition to the owner,lessee,operator,or person responsible for the existence of the condition. The owner, lessee,operator, or person responsible shall,within 30 days from the date of such notification, o or such longer period as may be mutually agreed upon by the supervisor,the Department of Fish and Game,and the owner,lessee, operator,or person responsible,clean-up or abate the condition to i -2 2209 45 226 2.2209 65 290 r i i. • �X N��3 I T ' �%�" N®vember 24, 1970 To the Honorable Mayoh and City Council of Huntington Beach: Vie, the undersigned,hereby respectfully petition the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach to take whatever action is necessary in the interest of the public health, safety and welfare - in eliminating the rotary mud dump located at the corner of Magnolia and Hamilton within the southeast portion of this city. We''consider this facility a health hazard, a danger to our children and animals and it is certainly a sever blight in our environment. We would further like to inquire why the operator of- this facility is allowed to use public right-of-way as part of his dike. system. We respectfully request that the Council seriously investigate and resolve this unhealthy and hazardous situation. c a . ` . November 24, 1970 To the Honorable Mayor and City Council of Huntington Beach; 0 We, the undersigned, hereby respectfully petition the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach to take whatever action is necessary in the interest of the public health, safety and .welfare in eliminating the rotary mud dump -located at the corner of Magnolia and Hamilton within the southeast portion of this city. We consider this facility a health hazard, a danger to our children and animals and it is certainly a severe blight in our environment. We would further like to inquire why the operator of this facility is allowed to use public right-of-way as part of his dike system. We respectfully request that the Council seriously investigate and resolve this unhealthy and hazardous situation. �/ O ` j�/LO �� v ,`�u,� D /v2 j�J��1-c�L/ l�� �j✓Lfi ��� �G�:.,;��-:�E _ FOAl n - —�L��Le_z r yo 4A,zlrl�w ga a � c Ir � r GZ2 .23 November 24, 1970 To the Honorable Mayor and City Council of Huntington Beach: We, the undersigned, hereby respectfully petition the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach to take whatever action is necessary in the interest of the public health, safety and welfare in eliminating the rotary mud dump located at the corner of Magnolia and Hamilton within the southeast portion of this city. We consider this facility a health hazard, a danger to our children and .animals, and it is certainly a severe blight in our environment. We would further like to inquire why the operator of this facility is allowed to use public right-of-way as' part of his dike system. We respectfully request that.. . the Council seriously investigate and resolve this unhealthy.and hazardous situation. Name Address l tWASXA�' %-Wa N =O y� 01 . � - ♦ '''� d SIP 33 . November 24, 1970 To the Honorable Mayor and City Council of Huntington Beach: We, the undersigned, hereby respectfully petition the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach to take whatever action is necessary in the interest of the public health, safety and welfare in eliminating the rotary mud dump located at the corner of Magnolia and Hamilton within the southeast portion of this city. We consider this facility a health hazard, a danger to our children and animals and it is certainly a severe blight in our environment. We would further like to inquire why the operator of this facility is allowed to use public right-of-way as part of his dike system. We respectfully request that the Council seriously investigate and resolve this unhealthy and hazardous t situation. Girp e I a a r19 �t��4 /mow , —oL.✓ .3 �n 13 7 2- � z / November 24, 1970 To the Honorable Mayor and City Council of Huntington Beach: We, the undersigned, hereby respectfully petition the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach to take whatever action is necessary in the interest , of the public health, safety and welfare in eliminating the rotary mud dump located at the corner of Magnolia and Hamilton within the southeast portion of this city. We consider this facility a health hazard, a danger to our children and animals and it is certainly a severe blight in our environment. We would further like to inquire why the operator of this facility is allowed to use public right-of-way as part of his dike system. We respectfully request that the Council seriously investigate and resolve this unhealthy and hazardous situation. Ub.m e Address IIIZ•/�. r-. h� /Go I NO � �l�l,o • �'�et.cti� 6 � ��'�l /3 `f /L SL d� /67/ Al N 9 J� ,�./46 / ..� . November 24,- 1970 To the Honorable Mayor and City Council of Huntington Beach: We, the.undersigned, hereby respectfully petition the City,Council of the City of Huntington Beach to take whatever action is necessary in the interest of the public health, safety and welfare in eliminating the rotary mud dump located at the corner of Magnolia and Hamilton within the southeast portion of this city. We consider this facility a health hazard, a danger to our children and animals and it is certainly a severe blight in our environment. We would further like to inquire why the operator of this facility is allowed to use public right-of-way as part of his dike system. We respectfully request that the Council seriously investigate and resolve this unhealthy, and hazardous situation. 4 2 W I—rAA&Z 9,1 - `/ u O a 7L d - �24 9147'" ;i�z 19 (el ti ct WA 9zi �rr� ,ends November 24, 1970 To the Honorable Mayor and City Council of Huntington Beach: We, the undersigned, hereby respectfully petition the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach to take whatever action is necessary in the interest of the public health, safety and welfare in eliminating the rotary mud dump located at the corner of Magnolia and Hamilton within the southeast portion of this city. We consider this facility a health hazard, a danger to our children and animals and it is certainly a severe blight in our environment. We would further like to inquire why the operator of ,this facility is allowed to use public.right-of-way as part of his dike system. We respectfully request that the Council seriously investigate and resolve this unhealthy and hazardous situation. L lylg 12, (4JA NI t, ^ ' a .ems ��C � � ✓ '. ;�`:��_ '4�� r,'a _ . �� �• / 671 �L n c Zz p - - - -GAG%��- - ---•-- `-'� �'="�-��%� --%/��----%'-- - � `� - -�/-�_- �i V / U November 24, 1970 To the Honorable Mayor and City Council of Huntington Beach: We, the undersigned, hereby respectfully petition the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach to take whatever action is necessary in the interest of the public health, safety and welfare in eliminating the rotary mud dump located at the corner of Magnolia and Hamilton within the southeast portion of this city. We consider this facility a health hazard, a danger to our children and animalsrand it is certainly a severe blight in our environment. We would further like to inquire why the operator of this facility is allowed to use public right-of-way as part of his dike system. We respectfully request that the Council seriously investigate and resolve this unhealthy• and hazardous situation. • 'yn� 9 6 4 � � - Ij �� Oos i OZ2_ s 9� C i 6 AL:::;- ee �if/✓ .T y�Qiw!/ T 63 4 y r f AS , November 249 1970 To the Honorable Mayor and City Council of Huntington Beach: We, the undersigned, hereby respectfully petition the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach to take whatever action is necessary in the interest of the public health, safety and welfare in eliminating the rotary mud dump located at the corner of Magnolia and Hamilton within the southeast portion of this city. We consider this facility a health hazard, a danger to our children and animals and it is certainly a severe blight in our environment. We would further like to inquire why the operator of this facility is allowed to use public right-of-way as part of his dike system. We respectfully request that the Council seriously investigate and resolve this unhealthy and hazardous situation. Name Address 1 l ..L / l o _14 - 2 er Y / / i November 24, 1970 To the Honorable Mayor and City Council of Huntington Beach: We, the undersigned, hereby respectfully petition the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach to take whatever action is necessary in the interest of the public health, safety and welfare in eliminating the rotary mud dump located at the corner of Magnolia and Hamilton within the southeast portion of this city. We consider this facility a health hazard, a danger to our children and animals and it is certainly a severe blight in our environment. We would further like to inquire why the operator of this facility is allowed to use public .right-of-way as part of his dike system. We respectfully request that the Council seriously investigate and resolve this unhealthy and hazardous situation. Name Address z J-2� k5LL . `? 2 - W Zl a $Z o w ,,-L L. 7L J, . G . �S � �� , November 24, 1970 To the Honorable Mayor and City Council of Huntington Beach: We, the undersigned, hereby respectfully petition the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach to take whatever action is necessary in the interest of the public health, safety and welfare in eliminating the rotary mud dump located at the corner of Magnolia and Hamilton within the southeast portion of this city. We consider this facility a health hazard, a danger to our children and animals and it is certainly a severe blight in our environment. We would - further like to inquire why the operator of this facility is allowed to use _., public right-of-way as part of his dike system. We respectfully request "that the Council seriously investigate and resolve this unhealthy and hazardous situation. Name Address i J r o t A.&At?O c���.. .J 1L .4 aiT4*�,iS-?'� -r^""ic'�.S`.A� a 14, 4 Q A XV: v - '/& ? Wo Q) �O November. 24, 197C To the honorable Nlayett and City Council of Huntington Beach: We, the undersigned. hereby respectfully petition the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach to take whatever action is necessary in the interest of the public health, safety and welfare in eliminating the . rotary mud dump located at the corner of Magnelia ,and Hamilton witihin the southeast portion of this city. We consider this facility a health hazard, a danger to our children and animals .and it is certainly a sever blight in our environment. We would further like to inquire why the operator of this facility is allowed to use public right-of-way as part of his dike system. Jye respectfully request 'that tho Council seriously investigate and resolve this unhealthy and hazardous situation. V.yx?,I_'. ...-'� ._-!f L°''�d' %T--- �:'��I�'c�_ ',%Z_-.cl.�� ' -7.� � :%. �/�_f•e._. ---L.1•'t.�.t�C, , f'�r �.� . �J�.�%%G�'�(tL!.A'•--- ;����� i� --���—��� 1-"%�'-Y' 'i -�T: /�x .'��G� �f �-�: ... :Yip ! � . � ___. ._._ • #2 2 / i ZZ a C5 i t I f - :72� At -- Y-4t,� - - _ _ --- --- --- J ?_---------- - �� - November 24th, 1970 o the Honorable .Mayor and City Council of Huntington Beach: Yde, the undersigned, hereby respectfully petitionRthe City Council of the -pity -of-Nuntington fieach to to e-whatev6r action-is necdssdry zh trie. _- -interest-of_the-public_ health.,_ _safe.ty_and-welfare-in_-eliminating--tree___ rotary mud dump located at the corner of Magnolia and. Hamilton within the-south-east portion--of-this--city-----tie -consider this-facil-itSr_a_ i health_hazard,- a_danger._tc_our-children.,and-animals-and- it.-is--certainly- severe blight in our environment. tyre would further like to inquire ---vlhy-the--operator-of-this--facility-i-s--a.-llowed- to use-public-right=of=vray — _ as part of his- dike__sytem_.:-._ e_rspectfully_reuest- that-the_-Council_______.... seri.cusly investigate and resolve this unhealthy and hazardous situation, --- --- --- —- - �-,- -�—?a��:.�-w -ram— -- -- ----- - _ __- -- - -' a�,Q�,-�.,->- - - -� - --=---^-a,-� ►-gym=� 1�;,�.� � _ .�._- -- -- — -- ._ - -- --- 22 c6 . _ -- - - - - - - --- - - ---- -- - -- - --- -- =- - - - -.._. - - -- - i F,Cr ;�Q• November 24,, 197C / i To the Honorable Mayon and City Council of Huntington Beach: We, the undersigned. hereby respectfully petition the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach to take whatever action is necessary in the . interest of the public health, safety and welfare in eliminating the rotary mud dump located at the corner of Magnolia and Hamilton wihhin the southeast portion of this city.. We consider this facility a health hazard, a danger to our children and animals and it is certainly a sever blight in our environment. We would further like to inquire why-.:the operator of this facility is allowed to use public right-of-way as •p:r"t of his dike- system. ;ale respectfully request that the Council s.eriously investigate and resolve this unhealthy and hazardous situation. 7 z i . I 1 f (LIICl//nn// • L.V[iT�� I i 9064 ,L3 ez �—Vie_— --- 41 7�_.,?�i....,.�-.t�.� -- ------ --- - -fire--�==��--� -�==---- Ytr.,uP4 CT - - I�l/l - �¢ J �- .--. a .. ;. - ------- - - - jai-- - - - --- -- - - -� - --- �0-92-- - � -- �a�.� -��-6---- -- - - .. R March 16, 1971. Mr. & Mrs . Henry Duerr 21431 Bowsprit Lane Huntington Beach, California Dear Mr. & Mrs . Duerr : This is to confirm your attendance at the hearing, re the rotary mud dump set for March 22 , k 1971 at Edison High School in Huntington Beach. i It may be necessary for you to testify with P some of your neighbors regarding the common problem you face. Your attendance will contribute to the resolution of this issue . DThank you'. Very truly yours , DON P. BONFA City Attorney I BY MICHAEL H. MILLER Deputy City Attorney MnITM/ccj 14- Z j. 2. ov.., long, 3. ,2 lilcw 1 Ong V em:js i /V hh rox s 1—r-e i—o',tL n r c e S 7 p;7p_ 71 S. 2:4atutre of nuilsanc�? compli "' - — / - �/ �'J_- a-Mc-d of, Sa:ckle, &ariwl oa';er, dust, soot, rir cilrbor, (other t-ave you observed the above-efescri'lied cmilss4o3)s coiiiing from the siource cwpl Cnn n av L- .'a Li you or ally m riter of y:--ur hcus,�,l cold. becoai.e i 11 fro-m the nUiScMc-7 If 03scribe nature of IS yGur him.2 addi, i. esice. ;,,i aimanierdial or Ila ulactur-firm' iGSleor ---iated 'n value due to he -nuisance. t! -he -ty a t t' s . ' ' --.� - ; - i, a prop,?i a my fW-lilltill-'e, aill,1'0?1 10bi� %, ClOti demiz;ce yo ou at)0eat.- irl, ",r) Ics*Ofy� a 'o a i n,-t in rr ia n hec- Ei Complainant's 6-,Z ............ March 16 , 1971 Mrs . Duane Collier 9021 Bermuda Drive huntington Beach, California Dear Mrs . Collier : This is to confirm your attendance at the hearing re the rotary mud dump set for March 22, 1971 at Edison Hif.,.;h School in Huntington Beach. It may be necessary for you to testify with some of your neighbors regarding the coiiup.on problem you, face. Your attendance will contribute to the resolution of this issue . Thank you. Very truly yours , DON P. BONFA City Attorney BY MICHAEL MILLER Deputy City Attorney M1*'-LN;/ccj CL7 C 0!,,�rill T R D(j DY 1 &' L F l OR t"A0 N U I IS,fili CE C I P LA N Date IWI 1. plairled of:) rinz .gr Npe "A f,, ce-Tv- ✓ ' d Address �N,/z Phone 2. Coimplainant: Name 0- P -long. 3. Home address-1- JCK; I-Ahere long dress e 4. Business ad L-140 Aj J. Approximate distanCe lero-i-ii s,ou:'lCe----- 6. lklind direCtion then nuisan.-Ce occurred, circle. 1, E S is 7. Dates and hours nuisance OCCU'l-Ped 71 8. Nal"wre of nulsance complained oi", circle. ',smoke, charred Pao-r., d us t soot,- grimi-Q, %gass� sarb,on, ac-id, odors. (Other 9. Have you Observed the abova-described em-Issions col filo-m the source coi-ii-la-l-ned Of-r- 10. I'lave you or any i'i3emiber ofl' YtAflq" h0ttSei?1016 bt-IC01,13C i'll feODI till-a Mllisaq. -Ce? t.,7 ayes 11 Describe nature 0" '1 1 Iness 12. Piov,,, is your home address, zoned 101. !"Ilas t-he property at th"s address dp-m e -eMatad in va-we dui: -;--o th e: radsance? --/Z- "e, awi, 14. St-ekte an,,, damage done -'-0 r n C -Y iu 105. 14ill you appear in co,,iy-i; to yes -i-110 0 z Signature of complaIna 16. n-t 7�, use '17. Complainaml-'s N!%T'jCP jl - INISSPECTOR March 17, 1971 Mrs . Lana Tinsman 21811 Kiowa Lane Huntington Beach, California Dear Mrs . Tinsman: This is to confirm your attendance at the hearing re the rotary mud dump set for March 22, 1971 at Edison High School in Huntington Beach . It may be necessary for you to testify with some of ,your neighbors regarding the common problem you face . Your attendance will contribute to the resolution of this issue . Thank you. Very truly yours, DON P. BONFA City Attorney BY k MICHAEL H. MILLER Deputy City Attorney MHM/cj i I F I { ;i. .mot ,•.s p:�•i\ r'r T 1l� �V1t t fY f;[j (i�,rr� -j! .•i�-,;{r�s f f JI'Tif��;- IJ�J�S 41 L 1 l:tl..�sl �t..:i i...l �?E1�:,_ �•a:i' I\t�t ti :• Source corp.-) Narie� i. plaineel of: ) r 'l11t or pe) 2. Co!�ip�ainan' - _,Z f- � f25f 1� N�cr�/ L- �:a�i:.c No. •� (print or fype) How 3. Hone address z ��\ i1ow long 4. Business address there 0. NpproximpAte distance frONQ source� G� 6. Wind direction Yiiien nuisance Occurred, circle. N E 5 1 i. Gates and hnurs nuisance tccu,red� y ,-, i ,rr t 8. i4a"-�!Y'e of Ti�3:Sc?Yi �flf?Ih�ai6^:L[: 01, circle.e J`6?�.'+1:c•'y c:+�c: acts pc ucY', dust, SCCi:,, gr l!'+1e c&rbon, acid, :r� gat?.C-r g. :-ids}e ,you observed the abicwa-deosC ;bed M = g from the Source complained o ?_-..- 10. MwVe yL'.3 or any mieni ber 0•r y-vr household The come ill from the nuisance? ��) r "Yes", i, If yes •ui1o? !E . (Desc 'ibe nature 0f illness 32. How is your home address zoned �' t:-si F�eT�'L!c3 , �:Gl al1��Y'w(G l C:" i I') Has the /property at this address depreciated -in value due Lip th e nu isat:c4? 14. State any damage done to your property, furniture, automobile, clothing, Etc. _ you #J�\+ad inVu� .. l.:J VS C:.�i L�•iy? Yew {i•" f fio 16. Signature of comp Z a"i! ari"4 f'ia�""(`f ed 1•.onolli .S!ioS%�S,tS ',er own fl s L naf � CiJ! iCP TNSPEr3OR iv0. March 17, 1971 Mr. Walter F. Burgess 9401 Gulstrand Circle Huntington Beach, California 92646 Dear Mr. Burgess : This is to confirm ,your attendance at the hearing re the rotary mud dump set for March 22, 1971 at Edison High School in Huntington Beach. It may be necessary for .you to testify with some of your neighbors regarding; the common problem you face . Your attendance will contribute to the Dresolution of this issue . Thank you. Very truly ,yours , DON P. BONFA City Attorney BY MICHAEL H. MILLER Deputy City Attorney MHM/ccj iJ1. `• 1010 S. 1kzcp, Biuvo. , CALIi-O;:a11A C fJ;SA;NICE CO'PLA 11!i FOMI Source COiil-f f`uit,e �i• p ii?ii'lt^-d of: ) (print Or Type) Address t•Y C�_$'�1�r:? O!Z n r / c. Coiii3ia-In a;Il;: NaMie OAI.V e_�rC_-115L'✓,44'_ P40. Y66 7(6 s- i,.F2`'Lii . Or ;�. ii address � ' m^cd d'.S � 4. 3us-1.22SS addreSS/Z6,2-s �.��. �'� ., ' ��;—s =y� � r there J / i -C ~ 0i ti3E3 ZtS C? OC%Ure , CrC��6. eOnd d i 1 E S W 7. Dates and h?.urS nuisance occurred eD 4t. oet,_ .�� - � CIS � ,: � �. U. 1�`c? .t?i^G OfSl�C3C l i charred Y ! U e complained lamed o � C-i r.,C-'. mio-ke, C, � . red p a� ^� Qt1S"�9 SO ;;:� � �• `�• Have you observed ti3e above-described eii3"iSS dGi"t5 Co.,4l� fit^'vill .k3e Suu:'Ce CJt!C. C• "a"e you or ally member to { r"" ill IT OM c. .7 AI 1 ,� 1. V� your household U�:�.`1irr� i � t Y 1 t71� l.i lam. i7�i I.�i 4:i.... ® .__...-_..__�. yes S ! . GO s,Cli"" be nature 0-F i l lneSS _ is your home address ZcO:ied _� ___ U:?iiZ"id COirtil3e'l'C{i?i 0r i`uiiti 'i2C•6l?r'iii ; i.i'lc. proper-i;y at (.11'li.a aCiCit"I:JJ CiCi)i c C'r cite i1'1 value du l.0 i.;iC ii[,i'1 s<.i',%%.: St ." a1i6I dUlnZ n dC3ti LC your p"G 3E^4yy i u^n i lr: e dLL Oi.0 bi l C , CS0tp i•n g, ctc.—.__�_..._-__ a W-t ! }'4u appear :n court- t0 test, y? ��eS 1� PO t S3 -ia .ure oil CQi I-Pla'inal1'� arI ed .;.irp. S�iOUi(i US8 i3` il:di3 ti?;^S'i i;c�ii ') irliil, 13a13'�'S e;;;�rks a, A r �' cr(7. � 3 _'. 6`'� _ J •- V v, `\o?i uE 1NS ECi OR N.0. March 16 , 1971 Mr. John Schmalz 9431 Gulstrand Circle Huntington Beach, California Dear Mr. Schmalz : This is to confirm your attendance at the hearing re the rotary mud dump set for March 22 1971 at Edison high School in Huntington Beach. It way be necessary for you to testify with some of your neighbors regarding the common problem you face . Your attendance will contribute to the resolution of this issue. Thank you. Very -truly yours , DON P. BONFA City Attorney BY MICHAEL H. MILLER Deputy City Attorney Mlim/ccj L_ Di iO Q S. 1 Bm BLv -i,:Ima ����=UFU11A NUiSNICE CG3i'LAINIT Duie 1-23-71 _pp 77 ®ild 'Dump coni S1�a . •'i7 3 c'�hie o'a ' j i r Y1 Address — �:rE C�.a?�sa' rim itl v ;siu Walter F.Burgess - ��0,962-8187- a Tess 9401 Gulstrand 0r.Hi L ington B2 o CA 92646 kk;'rjj•_,�e 4 years_ •J r. :t U,---'>sa ss address Same here `,t. ,—v� bi:'3t]?v1te d'E5'.ar,Ca 'c"vi;l One half iT1Zle directly r.ui.CJta`mee o'+cu-,,9-rod ct,M]co N E S D ae, :s. ::id ..riju:^s occurred Variable _.._..__ OT riu-tisv-rice €:�:diipla;ned qi7 , cI, Fie. .�iiiv4 �y Q': arced Pc',�a�"!ei^� v �S'd y `av L, ;;;r"•i' -- a :r t,'�c , Odor—Oil 9 Surj5hu't 9- ---... : Classification 3-4 4V:iliJ Vic , _ T., ija a you obscirYe1 dc above-desciUed eivl Wi cord-h ig 1rG, , 'lle so"ocl y Yes 1-1 ��� .ao�5 o aril i�or,ber ofyt)ur h0u.;eil oho �C�:CYri e. 'a��� i i �ai'n 'ui e a3L,f�j i s No i. : . 1'i'la+UrL", 0, fl Ii ifs ss2. t ,. _, Residential "dii 7 CGatu;iz:E^�^'6�i f}r I'ta!'3ifi"?C';�?i'7i:J'1 ,-1-d ,addr'ess 1 e7p ecia•4ed it�a v t ue dUe tO ,the i A"i Undetermined a:'ij+ elciiba uoi e, 1".0 your propei"'Ly, '�'4i�'°foe'GU:'e9 tlt3�t'J li7i�'t�Ei;, C:t):f y�SirfEl kiv.�,`___ None - n cour. S' 'C M °eS 0 ;1"igCia"t:i;:"e o"!' Ct'Y.ili(3lu'8itu6'C'�4 �f parr^'+4:; a,orsi—it sh- ild U. C:ii;iq?5 i';(iaBi"t``S rei11ui"�CS_T� _�5... �P,l ±h t 1 bP a1T1Y� '�d<1 purpose and that a newer or more efficient way should be sought^ - af �r the of I -i. .t-.P; e to ;b p� � ril,, , ...�st [,!OTxUE IE . March 16, 1971 Mr. & Mrs . David Burrows 21612 Hanakai Lane HluntinEton Beach , California Dear Mr. & Mrs . Burrows : This is to confirm your attendance at the hearing re the rotary mud dump set for I'larch 22 , 1971 at Edison high School in Huntington Beach. It may be necessary for you to testify with some of your neighbors - regarding the -coiazr,,,,on problem you Face. Your attendance will contVibute to the resolution of this issue . Thank you. Very truly yours , DON P. BONFA City Attorney BY MICHAEL H. MILLER Deputy City Attorney mHm/cCj JG n U a-r' 5 . - ,h a irn o. n G - . G no C ► d r p. Sur. �^ s 9.6.g-.0,6).Y_y.. HO n G 5 U.► �-.n - U Y1`�, /J// /yam S. .Lr) ... C.0 Yl LS,a \�r;ti r,:t ;iL`,ik',• G.._ .!'!is 1'"E�':•7:�' :., .`�ej%`•i,�' c� ''i, _.:7zi ( L:i' �f„"�j i A' \Y/ c �:. ,p�� .� _ _ .:;' ::'1`j l�.,...,.:°'' '�i• \.. 5-r.•�.. r"=7'i.. . . -. .rf;mt. � _ �'� _a14: '.6f�.i i;U�ScS'.:,��? N �^� / .a :'. � ..`..� -: `' 'i.. v� L'1 i:> .. ._. .., r?{:±t'•'�:.:". . ._`.3 i:: �.'ri !:� '' ;t't', .F/ .'t;. :,i�:?::!f:,i.'? w:c .s _.._ os s :• 1 1 e,a ► n n i March 16, 1971 Mrs . Mary Wat land 9142 Mahalo Drive Huntington Beach, California Dear Mrs . Watland: This is to confirm your attendance at the hearing re the rotary raud dump set for March 22 , 1971 at Edison 'High S-cbool in Huntington Beach. It may be necessary for you to testify with some of your neighbors regarding the common problem you face. Your attendance will contribute to the resolution of this .1tsue. ❑ Thank you. Very truly yours , DON P. BONFA City Attorney BY MICHAEL H. MILLER Deputy City Attorney MhM/ccj QUESTIONAIRE MUD DUMP AT CORNER OF HAMILTON AND MAGNOLIA AS A PUBLIC NUISANCE 1. Name and address of person interviewed. 43azI 6.t)a� - 5 o` 9� y , 9, 2 . How long in the neighborhood? 3 . How are you bothered, if at all, by the so-called mud dump? 4 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way affect your health? �r .l�v.sv,►i Ct2p. c o7 5 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way offend any of your senses , e.g. , smell? 6 . Does the existence of the mud dump obstruct the use of your prop- erty or in any way interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of your life or property in this neighborhood? How? 7 . How frequently does the condition of the mud dump affect you or bother you? j J.Az� I "�Jy� _�_ 8. How long has the mud dump had a derogatory effect on your life in this neighborhood? 9 . Have any of your neighbors expressed discontent with the existence of the mud dump? How many? 10. Is there anything else you would like to add regarding this matter? /17 /42/1 . 11. Will you be willing to testify at the hearing on March 22, regarding this matter? ��e 2. March 16 , 1971 Mrs . Fredia Keith 21672 Bahama Lane Huntington Beach, California Dear Mrs . Keith : This is to confirm your possible attendance at the hearing re the rotary mud dump set for March 22 , 1971 at Edison High School in Huntington Beach. It may be necessary for you to testify with some of your neighbors regarding the common problem you face . Your attendance will contribute to the resolution of this issue . Thank you. Very truly yours , DON P . BONFA City Attorney BY MIChAEL H. MILLER Deputy City Attorney MHM/ccj QUESTIONAIRE MUD DUMP AT CORNER OF HAMILTON AND MAGNOLIA AS A PUBLIC NUISANCE 1. Name and address of person interviewed. M Pas Feed i 2 w /672- a/J a-A4 XX)- 2. How long in the neighborhood? yR 'S 5 Mo A)-rWs' 3 . How are you bothered, if at all, by the so-called mud dump? //dsea r?elS 02�d,G s 4 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way affect your health? Vo _ L 7- 1-2/_X-kc�-.,s M y eti.'/d 's he - th 5 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way offend any of your senses , e.g. , smell? 6. Does the existence of the mud dump obstruct the use of your prop- erty or in any way interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of your life or property in this neighborhood? How? 7 . How frequently does the condition of the mud dump affect you or bother you? wkeAleir ,see)a S 7,6 8. How long has the mud dump had a derogatory effect on your life in this neighborhood? 1. r 9 . Have any of your neighbors expressed discontent with the existence of the mud dump? How many? E --Z7 h a v e d�s c u sSe� 10. Is there anything else you would like to add regarding this matter? 11. Will you be willing to testify at the hearing on March 22, regarding this matter? 2. Date / _ 7/ Source com- flame_ 0_ /1 P I. plained of:i (Print or Type) — -- - — AddressA/y/y,'L to One 2. Complainant: Name ,p.S �,e e /,%;f,� No. 962 -7v 3. Home r Type) ow Ong N address (Print �a h2�a there �o How long 4. Business address there 5. Approximate distance from source 6. Wind direction when nuisance occurred, circle. N E S 7. Dates and hours nuisance occurred 8. Nature of nuisance complained of, circle. Smoke, charred_ aper, dust, soot, grime, gas, carbon, acid, ors. (other -----_ .__.._.__ ..._._.__�__..__..__..___.__� 9. have you observed the above-described emissions coming from the source complained of?_ 10. Have you or any member of your household become ill from the nuisance? If "yes", who? 11 . Describe nature of illness 12. How is your home address zoned (Residential, Commercial or Manufacturing 13. Has the property at this address depreciated in value due to the nuisance? 14. State. any damage done to your property, furniture, automobile, clothing, etc. 15. Will you appear in court to testify? Yes ( y No 16. Signature of complainant_ 2274a (Married woman should use her a n lfirst name" 17. Complai pant't remarks -7-he ,',�,d ago P:s- N o Z` f1 a!i g Zo 6� 19/ Lim NOTICE INSPECTOR NO. r ;larch 16, 1971 Mr. & Mrs . Dick Vermeil 9082 Regatta Drive Hunting: ton Beach, California Dear Mr. & Mrs . Vermeil : This is to confirm your attendance at the hearing re the rotary mud dump set for March 22 , 1971 at Edison Hi`h School in Huntington Beach. It may be necessary for you to testify with some of your neighbors regarding the common problem you face. Your attendance will contribute to the reso- lution of this issue. Thank you. Very truly yours , DON P. BONFA City Attorney BY MICHAEL H. MILLER Deputy City Attorney MHM/ccj QUESTIONAIRE MUD DUMP AT CORNER OF HAMILTON AND MAGNOLIA AS A PUBLIC NUISANCE 1. Name and address of aerson interviewed. r 2. How long in the ricighborhood? .a It Q,t� 3 . How are yo�u} bothered, if at all, by the so-called mud dump? U 4 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way affect your health? C� qv 1R�� 5 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way offend any of your senses , e.g. , smell?� V 6 . Does the existence of the mud dump obstruct the use of your prop- erty or in any way interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of your life or property in this neighborhood? How? lam} •�,�.� .�..� .h-.,�.-e1?�-�1 � -�'w c�`'� `�`� 7. How frequently does the condition of the mud dump affect you or bother you? 8. How long has the mud dump had a derogatory effect on your life in this cneighborhood? 1 . L 9 . Have any of your neighbors expressed discontent with the existence of the mud dump? Ijow many? _ au wail 10. Is there anything else you would like to add regarding this matter? 40 ILL CA�a. Coot t t i( 1`-�0-0 11. Will you be willing to �ify at the hearing on M rch 2t regarding this matter? 'eS 2. QUESTIONAIRE �4.1 MUD DUMP AT CORNER Or HAMILTON AND MAGNOLI-A AS A PUBLIC NUISANCE 1. Name and address of person interviewed. .14 Av T/ti G rd, 2. How Ion, in the neighborhood? ; . How are you bothered, if at all, by the so-called mud dump? Q/�fEtiS�✓/� 01�0/� S �I . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way affect your health-, 5 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way offend any of your senses , e .g. ; smell? G . Does the existence of, the mud dump obstruct the use of your prop- erty or in any way interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of your life or property in this neighborhood? How? 'v-'c � � ? . How freauentl does the condition of the mud dump affect you or bother yoi:? $ . How long has the mud dump had a derogatory effect on your life in this neighborhood? i� 9 . Have any of your neighbors expressed discontent with the existence of the mud dump? How many? 171 � 10 . Is there anything else you would- like to add regarding this matter? `7 11 . Will you be willing to testify at the hearing on March 22, 4/z) regarding this matter? 4 2. i: ±i±..e:±-:i:±sai11s ata :5=3:a:i:a a:a:±taxi?S±tat?: - 1� ••'•.+..• .;t; E vim•,.,. t �•,•• S r r; •� •ux;. ,�., t t �•.':{:•t;S:t _ };�r�t: i It E E l'.. -�-yuc���£�F.. tZ t. i- rts;�t:sss:. t } rt r 13irt7 ..g - y* ,+ YY•r =HN ti��'t��tt'a'� tEt:.;t.t ;]{I.=•':'i •.' I• 9ii3::. NUISANCE COMPLAINT FORM Date Source com- Name 22"_2 1 . plained of:.� (print'ry� Address d Phone.. 2. Complainant: Name No. r n or Type How long L 3. Home address /L ../ rho X t there Z How long 4. Business address there S. Approximate distance from source 6.. Wind direction when nuisance occurred, circle. N• E S OW 7. Dates and hours nuisance occurred 8. Nature of nuisance compla ned of; circle. Smoke, charre4 paper, dust, soot, grime, gas, . carbon, acid, odors. (o.ther 1zy,,'w_:R'--per . .__.--._.---_._------_--•--_..� 9. have you observed the above-described emissions coming from the source complained of?— AD _ 10. Have you or any member, of��,rvur household be III from the nuisance? If "yes", who?___-____�l- T��e 6✓ 11 : Describe nature of illness 12. . How is your home address toned_ s en a , Uo-PrOci-al or Manufacturing 13. Has the property at this address depreciated in value due to the nuisance? 14. State any damage done to your property, furniture, automobile, clothing, etc. �M 15. Will you appear in court to testif ? Yes ( !�}� NO 15. SignatUre of complainant z'LA/ (yWr-riedwoma s ould use�her o;• n i i rst name 17. Complainant's remarks NOTICE INSPECTOR NO. r QUESTIONAIRE MUD DUMP AT CORNER OF HAMILTON AND MAGNOLIA AS A PUBLIC NUISANCE 1. Name and address of pegson interviewed. Z16 s l 2. How long in the neighborhood? "7/ �aa,-aj 3 . How are you bothered, if at all, by the so-called mud dump? 4 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way affect your health? WV � �✓/�W� � %//M.f.�V ./tea// N �a 5 . Does the existence of t e mud dump�in ny way offend an of your senses , e.g. , smell? A 6 . Does the -existence of the mud dump obstruct the use of your prop- erty or in any way interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of your life or property in this neighborhood? How? ►/12� 7 . How frequently does the condition of the mud dump affect you or bother you? 8 . How long has the mud dump had a derogatory effect on your life in this neighborhood? 1 r 9 . Have any of your neighbors expressed discontent with the existence of the mud dump? How many? D 10 . Is there anything else you would like to add regarding this matter? c/12� 11. Will you be willing to testify at the hearing on March 22, regarding this matter? 0 2. •- : Date _MR CHl 9r /97) Source com-) Name D . j�U M IP 1. plained of: (Print or Type) AddressNPhone�l`l1S 1 d� 2. Complainant: N&me No. q - 7 (Print orType) Now-long 3. Home address Rr./thare How long 4. Business address "� ,a�,F`" there 5. Approximate distance from source 6. Wind direction when nuisance occurred, circle. N E S W 7. Dates and hours nuisance occurred N ��V,,�t„ W-,�FAT-ZlE 2 8. Nature of nuisance complained of, circle. Smoke, charred paper, dust, soot, �, gas, . carbon, acid, dons. (other ------_ .. .� 9. have you observed the above-described emissions coming from the source complained of?_ 10. Have you or any member of your household become ill from the nuisance? Nd If "yes", who? Ili Describe nature of illness 12. How is your home address zoned (residential, Commercial or Manufacturing 13. Has the property at this address depreciated in value due to the nuisance? �bTI�T 'KNr��� 14. State any damage done to your property, furniture, automobile, clothing, etc. 15. Will you appear in court to testify? Yes ( i4o ( ) 16. Signature of complainant V--r&i Z, e� 2e I (Married woman should' use h& awn f r`st name 17. Complainant's remarks NOTICE INSPECTOR NO. QUESThONAIRE MUD DUMP AT CORNER OF HAMILTON AND MAGNOLIA AS A PUBLIC NUISANCE 1. Name and address of person interviewed. 2 . How long in the neighborhood? 3 . How are you bothered, if at all, by the so-called mud dump? I-� 1C1H1Y 0 ENSIUL 0 _00a . �I . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way affect your health? (� N 0FFEN-S1V6 O't7U2 NGC� � YLoT �t2JE (� rU 1gaUt(LSt iq ►-r-ecT otu Hi^61LTK� bo i 1.t C?-N ' �na.Je z Y�Nnt2l CAE-FC-GT � . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way offend any of your senses , e .g. , smell? Srnell� w�« tq FCCi I;- Does the existence o£ ,the mud dump obstruct the use of your prop- erty or in any way interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of your life or property in this neighborhood? How? YES. F�:! TO 2 lrvve5 i;,vrA z CviuS1 0E2rQ b IN Z✓nuvrt -6 o 1n Pool t fa-tioI ( -a-, -+o /// bo'ieS ml doll 4-� e- oDoa- bece,,,w &f near n AwSNous. 7 . How frequently does the condition of the mud dump affect you or bother you? t� rn � 2v` � c c-f"ab � � '� CiovE2 ►vCd �L{ wcrud- C t('Y' f-ca'v� 8 . How long has the mud dump had a derogatory effect on your life in this neighborhood? 1. 9 . Have any of your neighbors expressed discontent with the existence of the mud dump? How 1many? \A/Ht ru � a lJa2 I S eX I +2cnwlY 1P/z6na�r&- 10 . Is there anything else you would like to add regarding this matter? , }lkS — I an Indi'v►clua- 14 �'�ar, 2r. C) C.40r1117d.nY W LS re5poIV 6(0� raw► dial a` ��`o�u world I�a�� b��� 1 q-,, P I e' I'n &,7 �&d S'rrla'z-s ago . 11. Will you be willing to. testify at the hearing on March 22 '. regarding this matter? 1/ � ! er 2. •' xF i,•�r•:,i,.•;. S•.•.•"•.•• �"kr��5?'- l � ro FFYY_.k-. NUISANCE. COMPLAINT FORM Date—/ Z ' �7 Source com- . Name��'� � c t- C R, c P f'E 1 . plained of:) Print or Type) Address ru ,4 k q ,v Phone 2. Complainan • Name No. v,83.2 Wrint or Tin How Tong 3. Home address there - yet How long 4. Business address there 5. Approximate distance from source 314 M c l e 6. Wind direction when nuisance occurred, circle. E S 7. Dates and hours nuisance occurred f)a7- Sch & eol_ 8. Nature of nuisance- r�omplalned of, circle. Snake, charred paper, dust, soot, grime, gas, carbon acid odo (other �-Do 6 S-----------__v..-._ ----------...._--------------� 9. have you observed the above--described emissions coming from the source complained of?— 10. Have. you or any member of your household become ill from the nuisance? �!/o If "yes", who? 11 : . Describe nature of illness 12. How is your home address zoned (Residential , Commercial or Manufacturing 13. Has the property at this address depreciated in value due to the nuisance? 14. State any damage done to your property, furniture, automobile, clothing, etc. w 15. Will you appear in court to testify? Yes u0 16. Signature of complainant _ e . n s au se he , n -rtrsir name 17. Complainant's remarks NOTICE INSPEC►OR NO. - QUESTIONAIRE MUD DUMP AT CORNER OF HAMILTON AND MAGNOLIA AS A PUBLIC NUISANCE 1. Name and .address of person interviewed. 2 . How long in the neighborhood? 3 . How are you bothered, if at all, by the so-called mud clump? 4 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way affect your health? 5 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way . offend any of your. senses ,• e .g. , smell? 6 . Does the existence of the mud dump obstruct the use of your prop- erty or in any way interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of your life or property in this neighborhood? How?/ E F 7 . How frequently does the condition of the mud dump affect you or bother you? . 8. - How long has the mud dump had a derogatory effect on your life. in this neighborhood? 1 9 . Have. any of your neighbors expressed discontent with the existence of .the mud dump? How many? 10 . Is there anything else you would like to add regarding this matter? Ar zi- 11 . Will you be willing to testify at the hearing on March 22, regarding this matter? 2. n'a ..r,.,=.p=.33}!%3�L'.• '-- 3.•.%••^ .,, i3..•••%?%?''. �t f - - s :t NUISANCE COMPLAINT FORM . Da to 3 Source com- Name ' (� 1: plained of: � - f or Type � Address Phone 2. Complainant: Namez,P-'/ t' 41 No.'F1, -2 r n or g How ong 3. Hone address 93 2 Y ��[,� z :� �J I' v there Hoag long � 4. Business address j3,�.: (r=y <l , >� _4. 1f . ;6L-°a r-. there 5. Approximate distance from source-:�; F � 6•. Wind direction when nuisance. occurred, circle. N E S W 7. Dates and .hours nuisance occurred 8. Nature of nuis nce lained of, circle. Smoke; charred paper, -dust, soot, grime, gas, .carbon acid /(odors.. (other __....� _..._._.__.__ .._ _._...__.._ 9. have you observed the above-described emissions coming from the source complained of?_ 10. Have you or any member of your household become ill from the nuisance? A O Zf.. .A)V, If "yes", who? Ili Describe nature of illness 12. Hopi is your home address zoned (Residential, onverc a or Manufacturing 13. Has the property at this address depreciated in value. due to the nuisance? 14. State any darrage done to your property, furniture, automobile, clothing, etc. 15. will you appear in court to tes ify? . Yes ( ) Ne ( )- 16: . Signature of complainant Tarr ed woman should use her o;. n. T rst name 17. Complainant's remarks NOTICE INSPECTOR NO. AW _Wok QUESTIONAIRE MUD DUMP AT CORNER OF HAMILTON AND MAGNOLIA AS A PUBLIC NUISANCE 1. Name and address of person interviewed. 2 . How long in the neighborhood? "A� � . How are you bothered, if at .all, by the .so-called mud dump? Do . , t exis Ace of the :mud dump in any -way affect our health? 5 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way offend any of your senses , e .g. , smell? 6 . Does the existen e o the mud dum obstruct the use .of your prop- erty or in any way interfere with the comfortable enjoyment 'of your life or property in this neighborhood? How? 7 . How frequ nt17.y does the con�on of the ud dump affect ou or bot er you? . 8 . How long has the mud dump had a derogatory effect on your life in thi neighborhood? �/7"Z.- M. t I 9 . Have any of your neighbors expressed discontent with the existence of the mud dump?. How . any? , 10 . Is there anything else you would like to add regarding this matter? 00 �-- 11 . Will. o"u be willin to testif at the hearing on March 22 Y g Y, g regarding this matter? 2 . 'tf: •� L^.: _ '' i '�•ti•!:•#; =i,•- ur- t t•iw .y..��fir .�i�i;• 9Fiii2`:•: -"�, -���.--Iwx_:o}'r �i'�5�-'�+-Y I 5;2; •ii;.•.i ` r`-E i;M. .�••�'! �• 2• 1 *�-� - .� •� �,js� iH'� 1 :_' ? ti`Sii: _c.� e - '• �• ;..;•%:; - _�� r��3fi ,4a-�. i,r •%ii :i% i�jti ii'ii :rts•:':y •irk NUISANCE COMPLAINT FORM Date Source corn- Name 1. plained of:; (Print orType) Address f ,3 — .¢ 2 A..Ali Phone 2. Comp 1 a i na nt: Name e.r 4 No. (Print orType) How-Jong 01 3. Home address �/ 3 . — •V .-O4 . A there How long 4. Business address there 5. Approximate distance from source 5 6. Wind direction when nuisance occurred, circle. N E S 7. Dates and hours nuisance occurred . 8. Nature of nuisance complained of, circle. Smoke, charred paper,. dust, soot, grinie, gas, carbon, acids odors (other 9. have you observed the abode-described emissions coming from the source complained of?` 10. Have you or any mpber of your household become ill from the nuisance? /�S If "yes", who? Ili Describe nature of illness 12. How is your home address zoned . (Residentiali Conviercial or nu actur ng 13. Has the property at this. address depreciated in value due td the nuisance? ® � t?t k22A / 14. State any darrage done to your property, furniture, automobile, clothing, etc. 15. Will you appear in court to fy? Ye "o i 16. Signature of complainant r 4arr a woman s use her. a;:n •st name 17. Complainant's remarks NOTICE. INSPECT-0R NO. QUESTIONAIRE MUD DUMP AT CORNER OF HAMILTON AND MAGNOLIA AS A PUBLIC NUISANCE 1. Name and address of person interviewed. .DEAN 5. W 1 LLIANIS 21GS 1 HANAkAI I-ANE WANTING-CON BEgcH i CAI-iF. 9Z464G 2 . How long in the neighborhood? YEAR S MONTHS 3 . How are you bothered, if at all, by the so-called mud dump? YES I 5NIELL IT ow OCCASIONS , 4 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way affect your health? No 5 . Does ,the existence of the mud dump in any way offend any of your senses , e.g. , smell? YESi OCCASIONAL ODER 6 . Does the existence of the mud dump obstruct the use of your prop- erty or in any way interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of your life or property in this neighborhood? How? No-r SERIOUSLY 7 . How frequently does the condition of the mud dump affect you or bother you? APPRoxiMATELY ONCE WEEK 8. How long has the mud dump had a derogatory effect on your life in this neighborhood? StNCe T FIeST NOT ICED 1T OR. BECAME AVJAF_E of IT ABouT At YEAR AGO. 1 f. 1 g . Have any of your neighbors expressed discontent with the existence of the mud dump? How many? -TWO NE1GVAEOVZS HAVE EXPRESSED GOKCIER.N . i 14AVE NOT DISCUSSEp 'THE MATTER WITH AWY o-r"F-Pt NE1G1+6C)VS . 10 . Is there anything else you would like to add regarding this matter? No 11 . Will you be willing to testify at the hearing on March 22 , regarding this matter? No • 2• 11. �2�}�, .• iTs i ^I:3 2'%I•�2 r�' 1 ,1ti, - - - {,(,�i>i,�- '�4s.'`> 1!- r I;'Ii:�•i•� .I,.. Jr-�tz - 3,. st, •t-a- < e- ' _ iai9 °•Isise i�iiC�• ii J -- , _ .-st_ tu•+ii;%i: .I-ie: :+ NUISANCE COMPLAINT FORM Date Source com- game 1 . plained of:� (Print or Type ' Address Phone 2. Complainant: Name Ho. r n . or Tj*3 Now long 3. HoiT* address there How long 4. Business address there Approxirrate distance from source 6. Wind direction when nuisance occurred, circle.. N E S W •7. Dates and hours nuisance occurred 8. Nature of nuisance complained of, circle. Smoke, charred paper, dust, soot, grime, gas, carbon, acid: odors (other -_.._____... _-• -_-;- . --....-------_---_---� 9. Have you observed the above-described .emissions corning from the source complained of?! 10. Have you or any member of your household become ill from the nuisance? If "yes", who? 11 . Describe nature of illness 12. How is your horn address zoned Connercial or Manufacturing) . 13. Has the property at this address depreciated in value due to the nuisance? 14. State any darrage done to your property, furniture, automobile, clothing, etc.- 15. Will you appear in court to testify? Yes ( No 16. . Signature of complainant T parr a woman should use Tier 6;;T I FR name' 17. Complai nant I s remarks ! NOTICE INSPECTOR NO. QUESTIONATRE MUD DUMP AT CORNER OF HAMILTON AND MAGNOLIA AS A PUBLIC NUISANCE 1. Name and address of person interviewed. �/Y Y S 1 J . L 0^1 /V A l'C d 4 �/✓ 2 . How long in the neighborhood? 3 . . How are you bothered, . if at all, by the' so-called mud dump? ICY /TS O pO,�S f}A/D BY Try POSS/ /3Z- �U-r D,q iv c- E To out c H i 0 2 N f7s TH-F }� G-�o 1A) 4 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way affect your health? Goo vG Z) T ws AR! E BR-F'A?,q IN 4- AN H E /Z- POLL(/L,QI/T 5 . Does the existence of the mud dump' in any way offend any of your senses , e .g. , smell? SMELL 6 . Does the existence of the mud dump obstruct the use of 'your prop- erty or in any way interfere with. the comfortable enjoyment of your life or property in this neighborhood? How? JUST T EPI?Jae L 6-2)0,'S 7 . How frequently does the condition of the mud dump affect you or bother you? S' 61 R 8. How long has the mud dump had a -derogatory effect on your life in this neighborhood? S/NG � W� /rlovE �� w}f ENE Ile Tt/ E- a: g . Have any of your neighbors expressed discontent with the existence of the mud dump? How many? 14 - 1 F,qs T 10 . Is there anything else you would like to add regarding this matter? 11. Will you be willing to testify at the hearing on March 22 , regarding this matter? V FN/A/� �� S 2 . _ ' -``t• ��';.H - :3ai':%2=i•5,.;�S72fi•�:t -.` �,. i ._,� r.{�-:c ->+ii • r:%;•:• t f 2.2%i ':;£•: cr.' ..� _ ��'s L7-4'2�-cx} •$;:;o:•t r,.;.•.• 1 i2 22..•.2i�:,' ;S r'�Z��t'+_.l� Fa-a4— 7- t �E;e: e�itt;££sis£e xei� i•. ?s.:+:.&?.a._s?: NUISANCE COMPLAINT FORM Date Source com-• Name ?IIYI—2-t S 1 . plained of: � (Pri orType) Address / UM /Yt/L d/J 4 IVI9621ve z �, Phone 2. Complainant: Name 7� 1_L Z-v/ No.,�a �00� r n or Now long 3. Home address /6 afjA/i4/r o there �51 YES How long 4. Business address there 5.. Approximate distance from source 6. Wind direction when nuisance occurred, circle. N E S UW 7. hates and.hours nuisance occurred D,Lfl NOT /I F-Zl' T,e4c.1°� vT s ��ZAL TLiHFs �- �FA 8. filature of nuispxacopplained of, circle. Smoke, charred paper, dust, soot, grime, gat, carbon acid odors (other ssL.Lr- P cek or C-&I/- iiZF., �7=/1 L L/,,/Z,-- //V 9. Have you observed the above-described emissions coming from the source complained of? 10. Have you or any member of your household become ill from the nuisance? �f/y If "yes", who? Ili Describe nature of illness 12. How is your home address zoned _ 2 of�v L (Residential , Z: Commercial or`Main0acturi�ng) 13. Has the property at this address depreciated .in value due to the nuisance? 14. State any da?rage done to your property, furniture, automobile, clothing, etc. i //OX/& 7,"T' l /•(A/o u) d F 15.. Will you appear in court to testif Mile f/�9RD To ao sO ( ) ( � �.ve�,✓c- a-4-y. Nl�v� 16. SignatUre of complainant cy/LD2F/// TMarAed v6m&&YsKoi0d tier o:n i�rsf: name 17.. Complainant's remarks NOTICE INSPECTOR N0. QUESTIONAIRE MUD DUMP AT CORNER OF HAMILTON AND MAGNOLIA AS A PUBLIC NUISANCE 1. Name and address of person interviewed. ��� 'VJ6/ ,.41%3. 2 . How long in the neighborhood? 3. How are you bothered, if at all, by the so-called mud dump? 4`. Does the existence of t e mud dump in any way affect your health? 5 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way offend any of your senses , e.g. , smell? 6 . Does the existence of the mud dump obstruct the use of your prop- erty or in any way interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of your life or property in thi nei hborho l? How9 7 . How frequently does the condition of the mud dump affect you or bother you? 0 8. How long has the mud dump had a derogatory effect on your life in this neighborhood? . 1. 4 9 . Have any of your neighbors expressed discontent with the existence of the mud dump? How- many? G�'ev 10 . Is there anything else you would like to add regarding this matter? 11. Will you be willing to testify at the hearing on March 22, regarding this matter? Y� 2. y Date Source com- flame 1. plained of: (Print orType) Address one 2. Complainant: Name No. Print or TKn Now�long 3. Home address there How long 4. Business address there 5. Approximate distance from source 6. Wind direction when nuisance occurred, circle. N E S W 7. Dates and hours nuisance occurred 8. Nature of nuisance complained of, circle. Smoke, charred paper, dust, soot, grime, gas, carbon, acid, odors. (other 9. have you observed the above-described emissions coming from the source complained of?_ 10. Have you or any member of your household become ill from the nuisance? If "yes", who? IL Describe nature of illness 12. How is your home address zoned. - (Residentia4 Commercial or Manufacturing 13. Has the property at this address depreciated in value due to the nuisance? 14. State any damage done to your property, furniture, automobile, clothing, etc. 15. Will you appear in court to testify? Yes ( ) No ( ) 16. Signature of complainant (Married woman should use her a, n rst name 17. Complainant's remarks NOTICE INSPECTOR NO. ` QUESTIONAIRE MUD DUMP AT CORNER OF HAMILTON AND MAGNOLIA AS A PUBLIC NUISANCE 1. N me and address of person interviewed. 2 . How long in the neighborhood? e 3. How are you bothered, if at all, by the so-called mud dump? 9 4 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way affect your health? �l��G'�G-� _�CI�G�:.-G�•.LL"�-�2G.C�� /l�-c' �. '�-E?c �2� ��t�J?�'P�'1. 5 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way offend any of your senses , e.g. , smell? v 0 6. Does the existence of the mud dump obstruct the use of your prop- erty or in any way interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of your life or property in this neighborhood? How? 7. How frequently does the condition of the mud dump affect you or c bother you? 8 . How long has the mud dump had a derogatory effect on your life in this neighborhood? . 1. 9 . Have any of your neighbors expressed discontent with the existence of the mud dump? How many? 10. Is there anything else you would like to add regarding this matter? 11. Will you be willing to testify at the hearing on March 22, regarding this matter? Z/.!.O .2. I Date Source com- Name - c- 1. plained of:; (Print or' ype Address / l hone 2. Complainant: Nave No. - e5> 9- r(Pintor ype How-long 3. Home address /l ei/ Zjc i-� el_ mac- ,�� there How long 4. Business address there 5. Approximate distance from source % le 6. Wind direction when nuisance occurred, circle. N E S W 7. Dates and hours nuisance occurred �,.r a • 8. Nature of nuisa complained of, circle. Smoke, charred paper, dust, soot, grime,_ gas carbon acid odors (other 9. have you observed the above-described emissions coming from the source complained of?_ Alo 10. Have you or any member of your household beqqme ill from the nuisance? if "Yes", who? ., J .7 1 i c 4 C 11 : Describe nature of illness i 12. Wow is your home address zoned E>.S i c'a%t (Residential, Commercial or Manufacturing 13. Has the property at this address depreciated in value due to the nuisance? 'M 14. State any damage done to your property, furniture, automobilR, clothing, etc. 15. Will you appear in court to testify? Yes No 16. Signature of complainant (MarriSd/womann shou-Wd r a:n fi st name 17. Complainant's remarks NOTICE INSPECTOR NO. QUESTIONAIRE MUD DUMP AT CORNER OF HAMILTON AND MAGNOLIA AS A PUBLIC NUISANCE 1. Name and address of person interviewed. 2. How long in the neighborhood? d" 3. How are you bothered, if at all, by the so-called mud dump? 0 4 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way affect your health? 5 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way offend any of your senses, e.g. , smell? 6 . Does the existence of the mud dump obstruct the use of your prop- erty or in any way interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of your life or property in this neighborhood? How? oLG� aG��,�,.�-E �--Ye-eC� -.ram ���e►�--�a-���--C�, . 7. How frequently does the condition of the mud dump affect you or bother you? 8. How long has the mud dump had a derogatory effect on your life in this neighborhood? 1. I 4. 9 . Have any of your neighbors expressed discontent with the existence of the mud dump? How many? 10 . Is there anything else you would like to add regarding this matter? 11. Will you be willing to testify at the hearing on March 22, regarding this matter? 2. QUESTIONAIRE MUD DUMP AT CORNER OF HAMILTON AND MAGNOLIA AS A PUBLIC NUISANCE 1. Name and address of person interviewed. 14 2- t11�v►1C� ���� P v���1— o�� ��.0t�►%1 2. How long in the neighborhood? V-14 15 3. How are �� 1 you bothered, if at all, by the so-called mud dump? I v O X I D u5 DDb►-3 oN 01cc45-16,Av5 olc So,vveSf oG6ec fs - Su,—e-re,Pe d S6r2P 73i ,0:A-f 4 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way affect your health? L ` 5 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way offend any of your senses , e.g. , smell? Sine' 6 . Does the existence of the mud dump obstruct the use of your prop- erty or in any way interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of your ilife or property in this neighborhood? How? `Does ►� �,��\�F'SS U is, t ice) �'�t�re��s 0V\ RVA 11vQ.S 7 . How frequently does the condition of the mud dump affect you or bother you? ��G11 \t`^� 'C� GJE l� G► � l`1�f'�^5'fGt�O�1 '"�G11m� 9'1'1 `F �I"�� vle(ICI Sd ow s eci fic dCC'As,,ors h,-s c,4*_ve� Sae-e 7;5 719 f"`bare 8. How long has the mud dump had a derogatory effect on your life in this neighborhood? . 1. a 9 . Have any of your neighbors expressed discontent with the existence of the mud dump? How many? J, crx A F u p vt.y p vj o- 10 . Is there anything else you would like to add regarding this matter? — — 11. Will you be willing to testify at the hearing on March 22, regarding this matter? V5 2. f� Date o2a 1::it 1 ,07 7� - Source com- tame �I e V F� soh Iw la-V r l u� vh I. plained ot:3 (Pr in rType) Address n!O , 2. Complainant: Name. realJ L. �.ev- No. r yp or e How-long3. Home address I V�,z— _A there��l�s How long 4. Business address40eleiZL Z there 5. Approximate distance from source /6 /- 6. Wind direction when nuisance occurred, circle. N e S W 7. pates and hours nuisance occurred 71 -57,Eaa eS A �bx -7 M I� T'Y� 8. Nature of nuisance complained of, circle. Smoke, charred paper, dust, soot, grime, gas, carbon, acid, odors. (other --._.r 9. have you observed the above-described emissions coming from the source complained of? AUo I'd A/S 10. Have you or any er of your household become ill from the nuisance?— t/-eS -- Dom-S�4iieF If "yes", who? , e Il i Describe nature of illness e ax?e oRZ� 12. How is your home address zoned QSt 1,4-1- _ (Residential, nn-vwrcial or nu actur ng 13. Has the property at this address depreciated in va/lue due to the nuisance? isl 14. State arty damage done to your property, furniture, automobile, clothing, etc. ItIcIlve 15. Will you appear in cour=/Os ify? Yes (X) No ( ) 16. Signature of complainan (married womdn should- usle her awn first name 17. Complainant's remarks i e &d aR fAy,,��gl�,�es::1eW l� eR1 ygl1w eee Pl��-ew NOTICE INSPECTOR NO. i QUESTIONAIRE 7x�� MUD DUMP AT CORNER OF HAMILTON AND MAGNOL A AS A PUBLIC NUISANCE 1. Name and address of person interviewed. J 9_e� (2,01 �70 7A 4 1 . #&_ C'�. 2. How long in the neighborhood? 3 . How are you bothered, if at all, by the so-called mud dump? 4 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way affect your health? --c' 5 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way offend any of your senses , e.g. , smell? 6 . Does the existence of the mud dump obstruct the use of your prop- erty or in any way interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of your life or property in this neighborhood? How? 4� p 'Z� C-d�-a-ems 7 . How frequently does the condition of the mud dump affect you or bother you? 8. How long has the mud dump had a derogatory effect on your life in this neighborhood? 1. 9 . Have any -of your neighbors expressed discontent with the existence of the mud dump? How many? 10 . Is there anything else you would like to add regarding this matter? 11. Will you be willing to testify at the hearing on March 22, regarding this matter? 2 . QUESTIONAIRE MUD DUMP AT CORNER OF HAMILTON AND MAGNOLIA AS A PUBLIC NUISANCE 1. Name and address of person int��eirviewed. 900/ �.E'GiFI C/,P�GG,c 2. How long in the neighborhood? 3 . How are you bothered, if at all, by the so-called mud dump? oz:)ne i1jOi5� DF ��t�fGs , 4 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way affect your health? /VO 5 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way offend any of your senses , e.g. , smell? yes./ 6 . Does the existence of the mud dump obstruct the use of your prop- erty or in any way interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of your life or property in this neighborhood? How? g6 5 _ SO�F- 7-idl,ES GSA"ar SA,e f3-Qti'6- 7 . How frequently does the condition of the mud dump affect you or bother you? ° 8. How long has the mud dump had a derogatory effect on your life in this neighborhood? . 1. 9 . Have any of your neighbors expressed discontent with the existence of the mud dump? How many? �ES_ ��/,��•,yG�CL� Dxl ri,/E f�LOGK 10 . Is there anything else you would like to add regarding this matter? j�/E .G�oKs OG Tf1� i.Ei� C-�E77 ir, /Z- GIUE 11. Will you be willing to testify at the hearing on March 22, regarding this matter? ClJDC1G A /3E '/AD 7a .— /3u;r l7uF i a ��°K G�.�tCeG v G3E GivfI�3L� 70, 2. -~ QUESTIONAIRE k, MUD DUMP AT CORNER OF HAMILTON AND MAGNOLIA AS A PUBLIC NUISANCE 1. Name and address of person interviewed. 2. How long in the neighborhood? 3 . How are you bothered, if at all, by the so-called mud dump? a � 4 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way affect your health? 5. Does the existence of the mud dump in any way offend any of your senses , e.g. , smell? s, 6 . Does the existence of the mud dump obstruct the use of your prop- erty or in any way interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of your life or property in .this neighborhood? How? S ' J k i -: 7 . How frequently does the condition of the mud dump-- affect you or bother you? , + � n U 8. How long has the mud dump had a derogatory effect on your life in this neighborhood? '� 1. I 9 . Have any of your neighbors expressed discontent with the existence of the mud dump?. How many? $ A C 5 10. Is there anything else you would like to add regarding this matter? 11. Will you be willing to testify at the hearing on March 22, regarding this matter? - I i 2. -7 QUESTIONAIRE � �'31rt�E-/G MUD DUMP AT CORNER OF HAMILTON AND MAGNOLIA AS A PUBLIC NUISANCE 1. Name and address of personr interviewed. C; pry an c? 90 f 4Je ek. 2. How long in the neighborhood? J 3 . How are you bothered, if at all, by the so-called mud dump? e�.sr ue O-�or s " 4 4 . Does the existence of the mud dump in/ any way affect your health? A V v e'o' V, C-q s �y l / 5 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way offend any of your senses , e.g. , smell? 2S � 6 . Does the existence of the mud dump obstruct the use of your prop- erty or in any way interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of your life or property in this neighborhood?(( How? I Z W OLA ICL e�e�r -6 b� 1 tvLor.s wV Qu' `t�e o f o�- 1 s 7. How frequently does the condition of the mud dump affect you or bother you? �fala�� y r ua Tod- � � v o oY 8. How long has the mud dump had a derogatory effect on your life in this neighborhood? I ,A' Sc VIG-C S ���oir4 Ly . 1. 9 . Have any of your neighbors expressed discontent with the existence of the mud dump? How many? e.5, C14 a �Id� c.6or,�-elk i 10. Is there anything else you would like to add regarding this matter? ff I �lit� "V otlr aa,4 s +l�w� Y�cc IDe P(� w '`�t, 4 rs z o-►/ 11. Will you be willing to testify at the hearing on March 22, regarding this matter? �eS, 2 . QUESTIONAIRE -4 11a,2- `G MUD DUMP AT CORNER OF HAMILTON AND MAGNOLIA AS A PUBLIC NUISANCE 1. Name and address of person interviewed. PA wL kV , a/2 /v yUG 2- A// G/./2r-L C/ILC L E /71�JAI 13 C'_/-f 2. How long in the neighborhood? 6v / Yens 3 . How are you bothered, if at all, by the so-called mud dump? t5 A4 L S 4 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way affect your health? /V a 5 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way offend any of your senses , e.g. , smell? 6 . Does the existence of the mud dump obstruct the use of your prop- erty or in any way interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of your life or property in this neighborhood? How? Y G `z> 7 . How frequently does the condition of the mud dump affect you or bother you? L — S 14E vL/C 149 L JAL u 5 - G- vd/L f/ -�`'-i/I�J•� �' Lo b�' G�-"T i T' 8. How long has the mud dump had a derogatory effect on your life in this neighborhood? 1. 9 . Have any of your neighbors expressed discontent with the existence of the mud dump? How many? 10 . Is there anything else you would like to add regarding this matter? 11. Will you be willing to testify at the hearing on March 22, regarding this matter? 2 .. QUESTIONAIRE MUD DUMP AT CORNER OF HAMILTON AND MAGNOLIA AS A PUBLIC NUISANCE 1. Name and address of person interviewed. 2. How long in the neighborhood? 3 . How are you bothered, if at all, by the so-called mud dump? 4. Does the existence of the mud dump in any way affect your health? 5 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way offend any of your senses , e.g. , smell? 6 . Does the existence of the mud dump obstruct the use of your prop- erty or in any way interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of your life or property in this neighborhood? How? 7 . How frequently does the condition of the mud dump affect you or bother you? 8 . How long has the mud dump had a derogatory effect on your life in this neighborhood? / G ���l. v -� 9 . Have' any of your neighbors expressed discontent with the existence of the mud dump? How many? 10. Is there anything else you would like to add regarding this matter? 11. Will you be willing to testify at the hearing on March 22 , regarding this matter? 2. 7/ QUESTIONAIRE �-j,� /J MUD DUMP AT CORNER OF HAMILTON AND MAGNOLIA AS A PUBLIC NUISANCE 1. Name and addre s of person interviewed. 2 . How long inthe neighborhood? A 3 . How are you bothered, if at all, by the so-called mud dump? 4 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way affect your health? 5 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way offend any of your senses , e.g. , smell? 6 . Does the existence of the mud dump obstruct the use of your prop- erty or in any way interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of your life or property in this neighborhood? How? `;eJ ate , 7. How frequently does the condition of the mud dump affect you_ or bother you? 8. How long has the mud dump had a derogatory effect on your life in this neighborhood? 1. �l 9 . Have any of your neighbors expressed discontent with the existence of the mud dump? How many? 10 . Is there anything else you would like to add regarding this matter? cc, Vga 9f 11. Will you be willing to testify at the hearing on March 22, regarding this matter? d 2 . QUESTIONAIRE MUD DUMP AT CORNER OF HAMILTON AND MAGNOLIA AS A PUBLIC NUISANCE 1. Name and address of person interviewed. 2. How long 'Sn the neighborhood? 3 . How are you bothered, if at all, by the so-called mud dump? C/Ow /e 7//e a1,oloaeat-G,ve e-,. 4 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way affect your health? `70 5 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way offend any of your senses, e.g. , smell? .S;w e // 6 . Does the existence of the mud dump obstruct the use of your prop- erty or in any way interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of your life or property in this neighborhood? How? el ell �- -srrr�// rim,"�i�/� Q�IV � 7ef-d 5 7 . How frequently does the condition of the mud dump affect you or bother you? -e 8. How long has the mud dump had a derogatory effect on your life in this neighborhood? 9 . Have any of your neighbors expressed discontent with the existence of the mud dump? How many? 10 . Is there anything else you would like to add regarding this matter? 11. Will you be willing to testify at the hearing on March 22 , regarding this matter? / 2. QUESTIONAIRE MUD DUMP AT CORNER OF HAMILTON AND MAGNOLIA AS A PUBLIC NUISANCE 1. N�ja�me and address of�person interviewed. 2. How long in the neighborhood? 3 . How are you bothered, if at all, by the so-called mud dump? 4 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way affect your health? 5 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way offend any of your senses , e.g. , smell? 6 . Does the existence of the mud dump obstruct the us,e of your prop- erty or in any way interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of your life or property in this neighborhood? How? Oki � c;�.�-e-<.i�-�c� .�.<�L--�,,�� .�,�•.1 Vic_ v�-�-�i --a•� .�,�.e _ 7. How frequently does the condition of the mud dump affect you or bother you? ' 8. How long has the mud dump had a derogatory effect on your life in this neighborhood? . 1. I 9 . Have any of your neighbors expressed discontent with the existence of the mud dump? How many? 1 _ 1-16—A. 6 10. Is there anything else you would like to add regarding this matter? 11. Will you be willing to testify at the hearing on March 22, regarding this matter? � 2 . . � Date ,.17 / Source com- flame I. plained of:3 _ r or Typel Address- Phone 2. Complainant: Nave �.� No. OF-s r or Type) How long 3. Home address there Now long 4. Business address there 5. Approximate distance from source_ 6. Wind direction when nuisance occurred, circle. N E S WO 7. Dates and hours nuisance occurred _�, � /y 7/ (�i� 8. Nature of nuisa complained of, circle. Smoke, charred taper, dust, soot, grime, gas, carbon, acid, odors (other —"'—_ M--'--- -"".µ ---"--."". - --- — --"� 9. Have you observed the above-described emissions coming from the source complained of?_ 10. Have you or any member of your household become ill from the nuisance? � If "yes", who? IL Describe nature of illness 12. Now is your home address zoned (Residential. Con�rcia or Manufacturing 13. Has the property at this address depreciated in value due to the nuisance? 14. State arty damage done to your property, furniture, automobile, clothing, etc. 15. Wil.1 you appear in court to testify? Yes ( ) No ( �) 16. Signature of complainant (Marridd woman should u e ier Ovin first name 17. Complainant's remarks NOTICE INSPECTOR NO. r -- QUESTIONAIRE MUD DUMP AT CORNER OF HAMILTON AND MAGNOLIA AS A PUBLIC NUISANCE 1. Name and address of person interviewed. 2. How long in the neighborhood? 3 ivyaw..,,1 3 . How are you bothered, if at all, by the so-called mud dump? 4 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way affect your health? 5 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way offend any of your senses , e.g. , smell? 6 . Does the existence of the mud dump obstruct the use of your prop- erty or in any way interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of your life or property in this neighborhood? How? 7 . How frequently does the condition of the mud dump affect you or bother you? 8. How long has the mud dump had a derogatory effect on your life in this neighborhood? 1. 9 . Have any of your neighbors expressed discontent with the existence of the mud dump? How many? 10. Is there anything else you would like to add regarding this matter? 11. Will you be willing to testify at the hearing on March 22, regarding this matter? 2. Date /1'I�.:�,1� /0, l 9 7T_ Source coin- Name -,- � 1. plained ot: mentor Type Address Phone 2. Complainant: Nacre / �► , _ Ga o r C/ No. q 6 9-.10 S7 �r fnt or Type) Ho Ong 3 3. Home address Z L,a ri,o r a �-a n _ there Now long 4. Business address there 5. Approximate distance from source 6. Wind direction when nuisance occurred, circle. N E S W� 7. Dates and hours nuisance occurred 7 8. Nature of nuts lained of, circle. Smoke, charred paper, dust, soot, grime, gas, -carbon, acid, odors. (other -"'�— ------ 9. have you observed the above-described emissions coming from the source complained of?_ 10. Have you or any member of your household become ill from the nuisance? If "yes", who?- Ili Describe nature of illness 12. How is your home address zoned i (Residential, Coar—ercial or Manufacturing 13. Has the property at this address depreciated in value due to the nuisance? 14. State any damage done to your property, furniture, automobile, clothing, etc. 15. Will you appear in court to testify? Yes ( ) No ( _ 16. Signature of complainant o (Married manshould use her a:n f rst name 17. Complainant's remarks NOTICE INSPECTOR NO. } QUESTIONAIRE MUD DUMP AT CORNER OF HAMILTON AND MAGNOLIA AS A PUBLIC NUISANCE 1. Name and address of person interviewed. Mr. and Mrs . G. J . Hakeman 9332 Malahine Drive Huntington Beach, California 92646 2 . How long in the neighborhood? Five years 3 . How are you bothered, if at all, by 'the so-called mud dump? The odor is offensive 4 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way affect your health? Not to date 5 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way offend any of your senses , e.g. , smell? Yes., smell 6 . Does the existence of the mud dump obstruct the use of your prop erty or in any way interfere with, the comfortable enjoyment of your life or property in this neighborhood? How? Believe it is unsightly although not axx$3:,x visible from our property. 7 . How frequently does the condition of the :mud dump affect you or botrer you? Infrequently, approximately every two weeks notice odor which seems to come from it. 8 . How long has the mud dump had a derogatory effect on your life in this neighborhood? Six weeks 1. RIM r 9 . Have any of your neighbors expressed discontent with the existence of the mud dump? How many? Yes , three families 10 . Is there anything else you would like to add regarding this mat t e r? 11. Will you be willing to .testi.fy at the hearing on March 22 , regarding this matter? 2 . 4.11� le �.' zjck� t,r`�� .+ t �s`t'T,iC-t�t•c�'r y)� �q s� r ,��■F � :t ( FT' r'•'f YOr �. * i+�i s x 1 �FfF�. +'' L-cs��'F�� fi`'�.y".�y y 8.}'�. rj�k 'rrr��L Si NUISANCE COMPLAINT FORM Date Source com- flame 1. plained of:; (Print orType) Address Phone 2. Complainant: Name No. (Print or ype HOW Ong 3. Home address there How long 4. Business address there 5. Approximate distance 1'rom source 6. Wind direction when nuisance occurred, circle. N E S k 7. Dates and hours nuisance occurred 8. mature of nuisance complained of, circle. Swke, :barred paper, dust, soot, grime, gas, carbon, acid, odors (other 9. have you observed the above-described emissions coming-from the source complained oft 10. Have you or any member of your household become ill from the nuisance? If "yes", who? U . Describe nature of illness 1Z. How is your home address zoned (Residential , Commercial or nu actur ng 13. Has the property at this address depreciated in value due to the nuisance? 14. State any damage done to your property, furniture, automobile, clothing, etc.-� 15. Will you appear in court. to testify? Yes ( ) no 16. Signature of complainant _(Married woman shoMd use her a: n z rst name 47. Complainant's remarks NOTICE INSPECTOR NO. QUESTIONAIRE MUD DUMP AT CORNER OF HAMILTON AND MAGNOLIA AS A PUBLIC NUISANCE 1. Name and address f person interviewed. 2 . How long i `` teighborhood? 3 . How are you bothered, if at all, by the so-called mud dump? 4 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way affect your health? 5 . Does the existence of the mud dump in any way offend any of your senses , e.g. , smell? 6. Does the existence of the mud dump obstruct the use of your prop- erty or in any way interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of your life or property in this neighb rhood? How? 7 . How frequently does the condition of the mud dumpaffect you or bother you? 8. How long has the mud dump had a derogatory effect on your life in this neighborhood? 1. 9 . Have any of your neighbors expressed discontent with the existence of the mud dump? How many? 6 10 . Is there anything else you would like to add regardin this matter? - Z- Ehearing �- �-- 11. W ll ou be willing to testify t thon March 22, regarding this matter? 2. ` Date Source com- Name L 1. plained of: (print or Type) . Address gz ,� T o Phone 2. Complainant: Nacre s , - No. 1i �k -) (Print or How long 3. Home address . (2 �,���r ' �.��_ � ,� . there-�„ How long 4. Business address there 5. Approximate distance from source 6. Wind direction when nuisance occurred, circle. N E S 7. Dates and hours nuisance occurred 6, -3 T_.,� 8. Nature of nuisanc& complained of, circle. Smoke, charred paper, dust, soot, grime, gas, carbon acid odors (other --~--- ------__ _.�.-..__�__..__..___.___.__.� 9. have you observed the above-described emissions coming from the source complained of?_ 10. Have you or any member of your household become ill from the nuisance? , If "yes", who? 11 . Describe nature of illness — 12. How is your home address zoned 194�F w-71 _ (Residential , Commercial or Manufacturing 13. Has the property at this address depreciated in value due to the nuisance? 14. State. any damage done to your property, furniture, automobile, clothing, etc. 15. Will you appear in court to testify? Yes (po No ( 1 16. Signature of complainant L ► � rr ed woffian s ould use ier ov f' rst name 17. Complainant's remarks - NOTICE INSPECTORS NO.