HomeMy WebLinkAboutAdopt Resolution No. 2015-23 approving the decertification o il ��ar City ®f Huntington Beach
x 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND BUILDING
www huntingtonbeachca gov
Planning Division Building Division
714.536.5271 714.536 5241
NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL ACTION
June 1, 2015
Jerry Moffatt
Rainbow Environmental Services
17121 Nichols St
Huntington Beach, CA 92647
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 07-001 (WARNER NICHOLS)
APPLICANT/
PROPERTY
OWNER: Jerry Moffatt, Rainbow Environmental Services
REQUEST: A request to decertify EIR No 07-001 which analyzed the potential
environmental impacts associated with Rainbow Environmental Services'
request to change the General Plan land use and zoning map designations
from residential to commercial and industrial, and to demolish or remove
existing historic structures on a +4 4 gross acre site on the southeast corner
of Warner Ave and Nichols St
LOCATION: 7622-7642 Warner Avenue, 92647 (southeast comer of Warner Ave and
Nichols St)
DATE OF
ACTION: June 1, 2015
On Monday, June 1, 2015, the Huntington Beach City Council took action on your application,
and decertified Environmental Impact Report No 07-001 by adopting Resolution No 2015-23
Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, the action
taken by the City Council is final
Notice of Action EIR 07-001 (blamer Nichols)
June 1,2015
Page 2
If you have any questions, please contact Ricky Ramos, the project planner, at
rramos(&-surfcity-hb orA or (714) 536-5624 or the Planning and Building Department Zoning
Counter at(714)536-5271
Sincerel
Scott Hess, A CP
Director of Planning and Building
SH JJ RR kdc
Attachment Environmental Impact Report No 07-001- Resolution No 2015-23
c Scott Hess, Director of Planning and Building
Joan Flynn, City Clerk
Ricky Ramos, Senior Planner
Property Owner
Project File
i
i
I
j
----- -
RESOLUTION 2 015-2 3
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUNTINGTON BEACH DECERTIFYING FINAL EIR NO. 07-001
AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 2013-61
WHEREAS,the City of Huntington Beach("City"), as lead agency, has completed and certified
that certain Final Environmental Impact Report No. 07-001 for the Warner-Nichols project
("Project"),which project is more fully described in Final Environmental Impact Report No. 07-
001, and Final Environmental Impact Report No. 07-001 has been assigned State Clearinghouse
#2011081099; and
WHEREAS, on November 4, 2013,the City adopted Resolution No 2013-61, which certified
Final Environmental Impact Report No 07-001 for the Project, and
WHEREAS, on November 4, 2013,the City Council approved the Project, which was a
proposed change in the General Plan land use designation for the Warner-Nichols property from
RM-15 (Residential Medium Density--Max 15 dwelling units per acre)to CG-F1 (Commercial
General—Maximum Floor Area Ratio of 0.35)on a plus/minus I.1 gross acre portion of the
property fronting on Warner Avenue and to 1-F2-d(Industnal—Maximum Floor Area Ratio of
0.5—Design Overlay)on a plus/minus 3 3 gross acre portion fronting on Nichols Avenue, and to
be consistent with the General Plan, a zoning map amendment(ZMA)to change the zoning
designation from RM (Residential Medium Density)to CG(Commercial General) on the
approximate 1.1 gross acre portion and to IG(General Industrial) on the approximate 3.3 gross
acre portion The Project also included approval of the demolition or removal of historic
structures on the subject property; and
WHEREAS,the City received correspondence from Rainbow/Republic requesting the City as
the lead agency to decertify Final Environmental Impact Report No. 07-001 because the City
Council's action on May 18, 2015, which, pursuant to the request of Rainbow/Republic,began
the process to amend the General Plan and zoning of the Warner-Nichols property back to
Residential Medium Density,
NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Huntington
Beach as follows-
1 Final Environmental Impact Report No 07-001 for the Project, State
Clearinghouse#2011081099 is hereby decertified
2. Resolution No. 2013-61, which certified Final Environmental Impact Report No.
07-001 for the Project, is hereby repealed.
3 The Council acknowledges that this Resolution providing for the decertification
of Final Environmental Impact Report No. 07-001 for the Project removes all CEQA approvals
for the Project.
154756/121605 docx
Resolution No. 2015-23
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a
regular meeting thereof held on the /s day of ,unG , 2015
ay r
REVIEW APPROVED- INITIAT AN FP OVED
U anager tuWtor of Planning and Building
APPROVED AS TO FORM,
r� _LL I)"L.
f� City Att„mey
15-4756/121605 docx
Res. No. 2015-23
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH )
I, JOAN L. FLYNN the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of
Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby I
certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of i
Huntington Beach is seven, that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted
by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council
at a Regular meeting thereof held on June 1, 2015 by the following vote,
AYES: Posey, O'Connell, Katapodis, Hardy, Delgleize, Peterson
NOES: None
ABSENT: Sullivan
ABSTAIN: None
Cit Jerk and ex-officio Clerk of the
City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach, California
Dept. ID PL 15-012 Page 1 of 2
Meeting Date:6/1/2015
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
REQUEST FOR. CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: 6/1/2015
SUBMITTED TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBMITTED BY: Fred A. Wilson, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Michael Gates, City Attorney
Scott Hess, AICP, Director of Planning and Building
SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution No. 2015-23 approving the decertification of Environmental
Impact Report (EIR) No. 07-001 (southeast corner of Warner Avenue and
Nichols Street)
Statement of Issue:
Transmitted for your consideration is a request to decertify EIR No. 07-001 which analyzed the
potential environmental impacts associated with Rainbow Environmental Services' request to
change the General Plan land use and zoning map designations from residential to commercial and
industrial, and to demolish or remove existing historic structures on a ±4.4 gross acre site on the
southeast corner of Warner Ave. and Nichols St.
Financial Impact:
Not applicable.
Recommended Action:
Approve Decertification of EIR No. 07-001 by adopting Resolution No. 2015-23 "A Resolution of the
City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Decertifying Final EIR No. 07-001 and Repealing
Resolution No. 2013-61."
Alternative Action(s):
The City Council may make the following alternative motion(s):
1. Do not decertify EIR No. 07-001.
2. Continue the recommended action and direct staff accordingly.
Analysis:
A. PROJECT PROPOSAL:
Applicant/
Property Owner: Jerry Moffatt, Rainbow Environmental Services, 17121 Nichols St.,
Huntington Beach, CA 92647
Location: 7622-7642 Warner Ave. (southeast corner of Warner Ave. and Nichols St.)
HB -57- Item 5. - I
Dept. ID PL 15-012 Page 2 of 2
Meeting Date:6/1/2015
This is a request by the property owner to decertify EIR No. 07-001 in light of the City Council's
action on May 18, 2015, to direct the City Manager to initiate General Plan and Zoning Map
Amendments (GPA and ZMA) to change the current designations of the subject property back to
Residential Medium Density.
B. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION:
EIR No. 07-001 analyzed the potential environmental impacts associated with Rainbow
Environmental Services' request to change the General Plan land use and zoning map
designations (GPA No. 05-001 and ZMA No. 05-001) from residential to commercial and industrial,
and to demolish or remove existing historic structures on a +4.4 gross acre site on the southeast
corner of Warner Ave. and Nichols St. Based on City Council's direction to repeal its prior action on
GPA No. 05-001 and ZMA No. 05-001 by initiating General Plan and Zoning Map Amendments to
restore the prior designation of Residential Medium Density on the subject property, it would be
appropriate to decertify the project EIR.
Environmental Status:
The decertification of EIR No. 07-001 is not subject to further environmental review.
Strategic Plan Goal:
Strengthen economic and financial sustainability
Attachment(s):
1. Resolution No. 2015-23 "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach
Decertifying Final EIR No. 07-001 and Repealing Resolution No. 2013-61."
SH:JV:RR:KDC
Item 5. - 2 HB -58-
RESOLUTION 2015-23
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUNTINGTON BEACH DECERTIFYING FINAL EIR NO. 07-001
AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 2013-61
WHEREAS, the City of Huntington Beach ("City"), as lead agency, has completed and certified
that certain Final Environmental Impact Report No. 07-001 for the Warner-Nichols project
("Project"), which project is more fully described in Final Environmental Impact Report No. 07-
001, and Final Environmental Impact Report No. 07-001 has been assigned State Clearinghouse
#2011081099; and
WHEREAS, on November 4, 2013,the City adopted Resolution No. 2013-61, which certified
Final Environmental Impact Report No. 07-001 for the Project; and
WHEREAS, on November 4, 2013, the City Council approved the Project, which was a
proposed change in the General Plan land use designation for the Warner-Nichols property from
RM-15 (Residential Medium Density-- Max 15 dwelling units per acre) to CG-F1 (Commercial
General—Maximum Floor Area Ratio of 0.35) on a plus/minus 1.1 gross acre portion of the
property fronting on Warner Avenue and to 1-F2-d (Industrial—Maximum Floor Area Ratio of
0.5—Design Overlay) on a plus/minus 3.3 gross acre portion fronting,on Nichols Avenue, and to
be consistent with the General Plan, a zoning map amendment (ZMA) to change the zoning
designation from RM (Residential Medium Density) to CG(Commercial General) on the
approximate 1.1 gross acre portion and to IG (General Industrial) on the approximate 3.3 gross
acre portion. The Project also included approval of the demolition or removal of historic
structures on the subject property; and
WHEREAS, the City received correspondence from Rainbow/Republic requesting the City as
the lead agency to decertify Final Environmental Impact Report No. 07-001 because the City
Council's action on May 18, 2015, which, pursuant to the request of Rainbow/Republic, began
the process to amend the General Plan and zoning of the Warner-Nichols property back to
Residential Medium Density.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Huntington
Beach as follows:
1. Final Environmental Impact Report No. 07-001 for the Project, State
Clearinghouse #2011081099 is hereby decertified.
2. Resolution No. 2013-61, which certified Final Environmental Impact Report No.
07-001 for the Project, is hereby repealed.
3. The Council acknowledges that this Resolution providing for the decertification
of Final Environmental Impact Report No. 07-001 for the Project removes all CEQA approvals
for the Project.
15-4756/121605.docx
Resolution No . 2015-23
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a
regular meeting thereof held on the /sf day of jcjA G , 2015
ay r
REVIEW APPROVED: INITIATE AN PP OVED:
41
C* anager it ctor of Planning and Building
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Att rney
15-4756/ 121605.docx
Res. No. 2015-23
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH )
I, JOAN L. FLYNN the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of
Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby
certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted
by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council
at a Regular meeting thereof held on June 1, 2015 by the following vote:
AYES: Posey, O'Connell, Katapodis, Hardy, Delgleize, Peterson
NOES: None
ABSENT: Sullivan
ABSTAIN: None
04404&)Of.
Cit Jerk and ex-officio Clerk of the
City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach, California
Esparza, Pay
From: Dombo, Johanna
Sent: Monday, June 01, 2015 1:35 PM
To: Esparza, Patty
Subject: FW: Waste Transfer Station
Attachments: wtsguide.pdf
You might need this for tonight? SUPPLEMENTAL
COMMUNICATION
From:stephanie green [mailto:steffiehome@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday,June 01, 2015 1:28 PM Meeting Date: (0
To: CITY COUNCIL
Subject:Waste Transfer Station
Agenda Item No.
Dear Mayor Hardy, and the City Council Members
I have spent the better half of this weekend researching best practices for Waste Transfer Stations
(WTS). It has been enlightening to say the least. In light of the lawsuit with OVSD and the
fact Rainbow has been bought out my Republic, I ask that you spend a little time doing your own
research. I have attached a few items that might peak your interest. What I am asking comes as a
concerned resident. Concerns for the community of children and the rest of our city. Some
interesting facts I found were:
1) The nuisance complaints you are hearing from the Oakview community are not unique. They are
clearly outlined in several reports when you research best practices for Waste Transfer Stations.
There is an abundance of data on all the conditions that arise from having a WTS in your
community.
2) Most cities that agree to host a WTS receive reduced costs for their residents for waste pick up.
(Funny because HB has one of the highest I can find in surrounding cities) And have a community
over site board that ensures decisions are being made in alliance with the long term community plan.
3) A work group formed by the EPA studied the fact the these WTS are strategically put in
neighborhoods of poverty and color. (Very true to the case in HB)
4) A suggestion by the EPA is for Local government to charge the WTS owner(s) a fee to ensure
adequate money to hire 3rd party inspectors to insure the safety and well being of the surrounding
community.
I have to admit I was a little shocked when I found that Rainbow has self determined that they are
not subject to the rules and regulations every other Waste Transfer Station is subjected to. See my
attached Nov violation of AQMD Rule 410. This rule states specifically that:
(a) Purpose: The purpose of this rule is to establish odor management practices and requirements to reduce
odors from municipal solid waste transfer stations and material recovery facilities.
(b)Applicability: This rule applies to new and existing transfer stations and material recovery facilities with a
permitted throughput greater than 100 tons per day.
The requirements are clear. Once they applied for the permit to increase to 4000 tons they are a modified
facility. A modified facility is subject to these regulations which include enclosure.
1
d)Requirements for New and Modified Facilities Prior to commencing operations at a new facility, or
increasing throughput at an existing facility such that it becomes a modified facility, the owner or operator of
either a new facility with permitted throughput greater than 1,000 tons per day, or a modified facility shall:
(1) with the exception of C&D debris, conduct tipping, sorting and transfer operations within the confines of an
enclosure that meets the following requirements:
(A) the area of all openings including but not limited to vents, windows, doorways and roll-ups, in the enclosure
through which air can enter the enclosure shall be between 2%and 5% of the enclosure opening percentage of
the total surface area of the enclosure's exterior walls,floor and horizontal projection of the roof, or the
minimum percentage required by a local or state regulation; and
(B) the ventilation system is designed and operated to maintain the inward face velocity of air through each
opening....
I have attached some of what I found - I even sent you my highlighted copies of a few. I am asking
all of you as our City Council to take another look at what this WTS is doing in our city. Please do
not do what the past City Council did and turn a blind eye. We need to start viewing the land and
community here in HB as valuable. Stop giving it away, and stop allowing big businesses to provide
the minimum (or less than minimum in the case of Rainbow). Rainbow thought they were exempt,
from rules and regulations. They are not - nor should they be. If they are the business we want in
HB, they should step up and do what it takes to follow the State mandated regulations and best
practices, especially when they have a 1000 of our children right across the street. Please do not
continue to allow them to give HB residents even less than the minimum. Please take the time to
read through best practices and the regulations and ask yourself are we doing a disservice to our
community by allowing a WTS to operate in the middle of our city, across from our largest
elementary school, even though it doesn't meet even the minimum regulations put forth by the
State?
This issue is complex, I see that. But from where I sit, I think if you are looking out for the residents
of City of HB, you will ensure this WTS meets the minimum requirements to operate in the State of
California. Hold them accountable for not enclosing, mitigating odors, varmint, and dust. I feel you
should also put into place some sort of ongoing source both financial and community driven to
ensure inspection and compliance for years to come. We can't solely rely the AQMD or the county of
Orange Heath Department to ensure the WTS in our city is not a public hazard or nuisance to the
community that surrounds it. Who has the most vested interest in ensuring the beauty and vitality of
this city? AQMD or the residents of HB?
BTW - I would have come to the microphone tonight to speak at the meeting, but I am without a
voice. So please forgive me for dumping this last minute email to all of you. Thank you for all you
do!
I appreciate all of the time and thought you put into every decision.
Stef Green
18041 Starmont Lane
HB
714-402-8070
2
rule-410.pdf
NOV Form 10-24-14 --Failure to Enclose.jpg
waste-trans-reg-strtgy.pdf
3
rule-410.pdf- Google Drive Page 1 of 1
rule-410.pdf CO"4-/� A)07- A"/J1` i Sign In
https:Hdocs.google.com/file/d/OB7fNsF8KdbQUUC1 BN2g2MOhCYIE/edit?pli=1 6/1/2015
Page 1 of 1
® SO TH COAST"AIR QUALITY MANAGFMIENT DISTRICT -
21N5 COPLEY DRIVE. DIIA`ONO 6AR,CA 91765.4178
MI [RATE OF 490LhFh']NNNICE. OF VIOL
LD
..
� }
W B vu) YY ,
a t . LX4. E�(46TW ��6k
MUIIL1hK3lIDDF!£SS' G►TY
I.Q.a
CiTy. E CN 'TELEPHONE a
YOU ARE HEREBY NiC YriFico THATAVIOLATION flF GALIFORNLh FiMTH A N D SAFETY'
CODE SKMON{S
ACIDI SO H t>i M'I,�IAPIACAEMET QIS7RICT RULE{5)
HAS BEEN COIQIAAITTED.SUCH VIOLATIONS MAY BE iPU NISHED BY THE IMPOSITION OF
THE cIVILoR CRIMINAL PENALTIESPAMR]BEDO' ARTICI_EACHAPTER4,PART4,
DIVISION 2$(BEGINNING V►aTH SECTION 424001 OF THE CALIFORNIA HE,+IaTH AtiNEi t
SAFETY OODE.EACH IAY DURING WH ICH THE VIOLATION OCCURS MAYBE PUNISHED
ASA SEPARATE VIOLATION'IrAI i}4FRORNOTA NOTICE OFVtOLATIONISIS,;LIEDON
EACH SUCH JDAY.'
Descrlptp of violation.. _
%TrA b
z
i
"y
INSK-CTOR
SERVED TCJ: 71FLB; '
OFFMIS OF STATIONARY
SOURCE OOMPLIANCE
ORIGINAL
https:Hlh5.googleusercontent.com/1 j gJsVbg6m2TDim 1 UUDOkoX5HIU6NOV 1 nRzpaEBu... 6/l/2015
waste-trans-reg-strtgy.pdf- Google Drive Page 1 of 1
waste-trans-reg-strtey,- t IfOIt-L.b N dT ?A-tj; C=Sign
Np S/6a.) /,v)
https://docs.google.com/file/d/OB7fNsF8KdbQUbHIwdl dZeHQ3bG8/edit?pli=1 6/l/2015
u
.,� i III I Ili
�, � a,.11 pill IIIIIII
�l' :�vlQi li IV
I
I hyh� i ul i
"I4i„Iq la � i, i i i, ^11IIIIiIIQiI
-
�
e'sy4 —
IV � h`IIII �
IIIIII I i �
„ `a iiulliillq - _
' lu
d —
� ii Illlll
Ml
WOEOE
V Y4"
ti
� iml J
iJ i I'III I III
� � ;i Ill it Ili
III IIII
� - — lllilli i ilpl'll"i�"fl � �IiI�ill�l'll�^kk, --
V ii� 1v IIIIIII IIII �I ��•_ -eh" ,,.
8 0 'I a IIIIIIII III 6 Aw__-
I'
- .�«,„,I,ipu�a ��,�iuV',I�� I II'I '� i IIIIIII IIIII i ip III Illlll lw:d, v ,�" I i,, ';i11, IIIII Ili�;i
- 'h i�III Illlll II,fF .3'Ill III III ^ it i ,,J IIIq��i
h
V la I
w lin f-I Ivy?
for 3VIA I L.-Owy
I IM�
You've just learned that a solid waste trans-
fer station developer is proposing to build a
facility in your community. Like many citi-
zens,you may have concerns, including
uncertainties about potential safety and
health impacts.You may even wonder what
a waste transfer station is. In simple terms, a
him
transfer station is a facility where solid waste
is unloaded from smaller trucks and Wil
reloaded into larger vehicles for transport to
a final disposal site.
Waste transfer stations make solid waste collection more effi-
cient and reduce overall transportation costs, air emissions,
energy use, truck traffic, and road wear and tear.This saves you
and your community money and lowers the cost of your solid
waste management services.
The selection of a site for any waste-related facility can be a
sensitive issue, particularly for those living nearby. In principle,
most people realize that such facilities are needed and will be
needed in the future. In some cases, however, concern arises
about a specific location for a
waste transfer station and
whether the facility will be lVe Iii-ni a n e d vv 1 s te 7vn
properly managed. stxldorls xve�
You and your neighbors can . Located,designed,and operated to ensure the
help influence decisions on public health,safety,and welfare of the com-
transfer stations.This booklet munity and environment.
provides key information you . Located so as to minimize incompatibility with
will need to develop an opinion the character of the surrounding area.
about a proposed or modified * Located where traffic patterns to or from the
transfer station. It also provides facility minimize the impact on existing traffic
ways or ideas on how to get flows.
involved to enhance the value . Consistent with state, local or tribal regulations
of the waste transfer station. and solid waste management plans.
51
A waste transfer station is a light industrial-type facility where
trash collection trucks discharge their loads so trash can be
compacted and then reloaded into larger vehicles (e.g., trucks,
trains and barges) for shipment to a final disposal site, typically
a landfill or waste-to-energy facility.Transfer station operators
usually move waste off the site in a matter of minutes or hours.
Transfer stations serve both rural and urban communities. In
densely populated areas, they are generally fully enclosed.
Waste transfer stations handle the trash that you set out for
collection. At many transfer stations, workers screen incoming
wastes on the receiving floor or in an earthen pit, recovering
materials from the waste stream that can be recycled and sepa-
rating out any inappropriate wastes (e.g., tires, large appliances.
automobile batteries) that are not allowed in a disposal facility.
Communities need transfer stations to move their waste effi-
ciently from the point of collection to distant,regional landfills
or waste-to-energy plants. By consolidating solid waste collec-
tion and disposal points, transfer stations help communities
reduce the cost of hauling waste to these remote disposal sites.
Waste transfer stations may
be the most cost-effective
when they are located near a
k collection area. The use of
transfer stations lowers collec-
tion costs, as crews spend less
time traveling to and from
distant disposal sites and
more time collecting waste.
E This reduces costs for labor,
y �> fuel and collection vehicle
maintenance.
r'
2
Why are transfer stations growing in popularity around the
United States?Besides reduced transportation costs, here are a
few of the benefits. The waste transfer station:
• Reduces overall community truck traffic by consolidating
smaller loads into larger vehicles.
• Offers more flexibility in waste handling and disposal
options. Decision-makers can select among different disposal
options and secure the lowest disposal fees or choose a
desired method of disposal (e.g., landfilling, waste-to-energy)-
• Reduces air pollution, fuel consumption, and road wear by
consolidating trash into fewer vehicles.
• Allows for screening of waste for special handling.At many
transfer stations, workers screen incoming wastes on con-
crete floors or conveyor belts to separate out readily recycla-
ble materials or any inappropriate wastes (e.g., tires,
automobile batteries) that are not allowed in a landfill or a
waste-to-energy facility.
• Reduces traffic at the disposal facility. The fact that fewer
vehicles go to the landfill or waste-to-energy facility reduces
congestion and operating costs and increases safety.
• Offers citizens facilities for convenient drop-off of waste
and recyclables. Some transfer stations have a designated
area, often called a convenience center, where residents drop
off waste or recyclables in collection containers.
Traffic, noise, and odor may exist around waste transfer sta-
tions. Other problems that can result frorn an improperly
designed or operated facility, include:
• Rodents and birds.
• Litter.
• Air emissions.
3
Thoughtful design choices and well-managed operations can
and do address potential negative impacts. This section will
describe typical concerns and offer suggestions that you can
take to your transfer station developer to help resolve your con-
cerns.A more detailed discussion of ways to reduce the impacts
of waste transfer stations is provided in EPA's Waste Transfer
Stations:A Manual for Decision-Making, Draft EPA530-D-01-005,
February 2001.
Traffic
v� Transfer stations reduce overall
traffic by consolidating smaller
loads into larger vehicles. The
� transfer station, however, will
= u.. generate additional amounts of
n_ traffic in its immediate area.
This traffic can contribute to
w increased road congestion, air
emissions, noise, and wear on
x roads. For this reason, waste
transfer stations are often locat-
ed in industrial areas that have
ready access to major road-
ways. Travel routes and resulting traffic impacts typically
receive significant attention during transfer station siting and
design. Some important design and operating features that
should be used include:
• Selecting sites that have direct access to truck routes, high-
ways and rail or barge terminals.
• Providing adequate space within the facility site so that cus-
tomers waiting to use the transfer station do not interrupt
traffic on public roads or impact nearby residences or busi-
nesses.
• Designating haul routes to and from the transfer station that
avoid congested areas, residential areas, business districts,
schools, hospitals and other sensitive areas.
• Designing safe intersections with public roads.
4
Noise
Heavy truck traffic and the operation of heavy-duty facility
equipment (e.g., conveyors and front-end loaders) are the pri-
rnary sources of noise From a transfer station. Design and oper-
ating practices that help reduce noise include:
• Confining noisy activities within buildings or other enclo-
sures as much as possible.
• Using landscaping, sound barriers, and earth berms to
absorb exterior noise.
• Arranging the site so that traffic flows are not adjacent to
properties that are sensitive to noise.
• Providing setback distances, called buffer zones. to separate
noisy activities from adjacent land uses.
• Conducting activities that generate the most amount of noise
during the day.
Odor
Garbage, particularly food waste and grass, has a high potential
for odor. Proper facility design can significantly reduce odor
problems. Carefully positioning the building and its doorways
with respect to neighbors is a good first step.At the transfer
building itself, exhaust fans with air filters and rooftop exhaust
vents can further reduce off-site odor impacts.
Some of the operating procedures that can help reduce odors
include:
• "First-in, first-out" waste handling practices that keep waste
on site only for short periods of time.
• Removing all waste from the tipping floor or pit by the end
of each operating day so that these surfaces can be swept
clean and washed down.
• "Good housekeeping" measures, including regular cleaning
and disinfecting of surfaces and equipment that come into
contact with waste.
• eater misting and/or deodorizing systems.
5
Rodents and Birds
Rodents and birds can be a nuisance and a potential health
concern at waste transfer stations, but few basic design and oper-
ational elements can control them. For instance, good housekeep-
ing practices are a simple and effective means of minimizing
their presence.These practices include removing all waste deliv-
ered to the facility by the end of each day, and cleaning the
receiving floor daily (small, rural facilities may require several
days to accumulate a full container of waste for transport).
Receiving waste only within an enclosed structure and otherwise
preventing litter can reduce the presence of birds. If problems
persist in the vicinity, baiting and trapping can control rodents.
-::;1 _ I4 _.. -- ''- -- `iM1x_?off �� --.�h. - _• iNiz,r 4_
When a public hearing was held to announce the siting of a proposed waste transfer
station in Auburn, New Hampshire, the town's citizens wanted to make sure their
concerns would be addressed.Residents raised a number of issues about potential odor,
noise, and truck traffic from the transfer station, which would consolidate waste from
Manchester, New Hampshire, and surrounding communities,including Auburn.In addition,
town officials voiced concerns about storm-water runoff from the transfer station.
A private firm specializing in transfer stations and other waste management services
listened to the issues raised at the hearing. The company showed its willingness to
address these concerns by proposing changes to the transfer station's design and operat-
ing plans. Modifications included:
• Reorienting the transfer station building so warning alarms from trucks backing up
would be directed away from residential areas.
• Closing the transfer station doors to reduce odor whenever trucks are not delivering
waste.
• Providing a trash drop-off area apart from commercial vehicles and extending operat-
ing hours to make site use more convenient for residents.
• Setting up a gated fence around the site to maximize security and safety.
Town officials also hired a consultant to address additional citizen concerns. The com-
pany worked with the consultant to develop methods for safely managing storm-water
runoff from the transfer station. The revised design included new drainage structures and
roadway modifications. As a final condition for receiving a transfer station permit, the
company developed an operating manual that employees will be required to follow.Town
officials reviewed the operating manual and after additional modifications,the town
approved the transfer station.
6
Litter
In the course of facility operations, it is likely that stray pieces
of waste may become litter in and around the waste transfer
station. Measures that can help reduce litter include:
• Positioning the main transfer building so that predominant
winds are less likely to blow through the building and carry
litter off-site.
• Installing perimeter landscaping and fencing to reduce wind
speeds at the transfer station site and to trap any litter.
• Ensuring that tarps on open top trucks are secure.
• Providing skirting around loading chutes.
• Removing litter frequently to reduce the opportunity for it to
travel offsite.
• Patrolling nearby access roads to control litter from truck
traffic.
Air Emissions
Air emissions at transfer stations can come from unloading dry.
dusty waste delivered to the transfer station, exhaust from
trucks, loaders and other equipment, and driving over unpaved
surfaces. The following can reduce air emissions:
• Requiring trucks delivering and picking up waste at the facil-
ity to reduce unnecessary engine idling.
• Working with fleet operators to reduce engine emissions
(e.g., engine improvements or use of cleaner fuels).
• Spraying dusty wastes with water as they are unloaded.
• Ensuring that street sweeping operations use enough water
to avoid kicking up dust.
• Paving all surfaces where trucks operate.
7
Every solid waste management facility is required to obtain cer-
tain government permits. Permit requirements may be estab-
lished by state, local, or tribal governments. Regulations, which
serve as the basis for permits, vary from jurisdiction to jurisdic-
tion.Typical types of permits that a transfer station may be
required to obtain include:
• Solid waste facility permits—usually issued by state, local,
or tribal agencies, which can govern siting, design, and
operations.
• Site development permits—usually issued by local or tribal
agencies, which include zoning requirements, building per-
mits, utility connections.
• Environmental siting approvals—which are addressed by
various levels of government and can pertain to wetlands,
flood plains, culturally significant sites, or other protected
areas.
For a state-by-state checklist of major transfer station regula-
tory issues see EPA's document, Waste Transfer Stations:A
Manual for Decision-Making, Draft EPA530-D-01-005, February
2001, Appendix A.
Communicate
• Talk with authorities that plan, permit, and regulate waste
transfer stations at the state level. (See the list of state solid
waste contacts at the end of this guide).
• Seek to understand the role of the various agencies. Learn
about the types of decisions they have authority to make and
the activities they can influence or control.
• Talk to the waste transfer station developer and find out
about his plans. The developer may be either a private
company or government agency. Make sure the developer
is aware of your concerns as early as possible so he can
take steps to address them. Find out the name and phone
8
--------------------------------------------------------------------
number of the developer's contact
person whom you can call for infor- n
mation, to check on progress, and to
share your concerns.
• Check the site against the rules of your
state or locality.Ask your state or trib-
al government representative for
copies of the regulations or where you
can find them.
• Get on mailing lists of the developer,
local agencies (e.g., zoning, planning,
solid-waste), and state agencies.
Participate
• Attend public information meetings, hearings, and decision
meetings to express your interests.
• Request a visit to the developer's completed and operating
waste transfer stations.
• Work with state and/or local oversight agencies to see how
you can assist in monitoring the waste transfer station's
performance.
Negotiate
- Your state, tribal, or local government agencies will deter-
mine if the proposed waste transfer station meets current
regulations. However,you and your neighbors may want to
work with the transfer station developer to negotiate a sepa-
rate agreement documenting commitments that you expect
the developer to keep. This agreement can include both per-
formance measures to ensure the community is not unduly
impacted as well as possible benefits the developer will pro-
vide to offset the facility's impacts. Benefits can range from
commitments to employ local residents, construction of day
care centers, parks or other facilities that enhance the com-
munity to actual payment of a fee to enable the community
to provide other neighborhood improvements.
9
It's important to get
�mportant elements of an effective public partici-
involved early to share your
pation process may include the following: concerns with the waste
transfer station developer
• Advance notice of any proposed public or pri- and government regulators
vate solid waste transfer stations. and discuss what the Bevel-
• Advance notice of opportunities for public oper can do for you and your
involvement in the approval process. community.
• Local decision officials hear and address com-
munity social, economic, and health concerns How can communities
in advance of site selection and permit filing. open up the lines of
• Open sharing of relevant information.
Communication?
Contact your local
• Access to facility planning and/or permitting government.
documents. Find answers to the following
• Reasonable time to review documents and,if questions:
warranted, the assistance of independent tech-
nical experts. The Planning Process
• A facilitator for public meetings who is experi- • Where can you obtain a
enced or trained in working with communities copy of the locality's solid
and addressing controversial issues. waste plan?
• Availability of interpreters for public meetings • What is the process for
and multilingual fact sheets,public notices and approving or amending the
other outreach materials. solid waste plan?Determine
• Feedback from state/tribal/local officials on if it has been followed.
how they intend to address community con-
Who is in charge of waste
cerns.
management planning and
siting new facilities?
• What is the process for establishing a new facility or modify-
ing an existing one?
• What area/ will this facility serve?
• Who is the appropriate contact at the local level for project-
specific information?
• Has an application for a new or modified facility been sub-
mitted to the local government, state, or tribe? If so, ask for a
copy or where you can view it.
• Are the facilities publicly or privately owned?
10
Applicable Regulations
• What regulations/standards apply to waste transfer station
siting, design, operation? Who enforces them?
• Find out if there is a solid waste planning committee and, if
so, when it meets.
• Do the zoning ordinances specify where waste transfer sta-
tions are allowed and the process for special exceptions to
the existing zoning plan?
Opportunities for Public Participation
• What opportunities are there for public input?
• Is there a central repository for documents for public review?
• When is the zoning hearing and what are the procedures for
participation?
Contact your local elected official.
Find answers to the following questions:
• What information is available on the project?
• What is the schedule for building the facility?
• What is the size of the facility?
• What are the proposed tonnages that the facility will handle,
and what communities will they be coming from?
• How much traffic will the
facility generate? t
• When is the public meeting t,
scheduled?
Contact your state solid waste
or tribal environmental r
agency. a ,
Find answers to the following
questions:
k 1
• What administrative require-
ments exist, including public - �
hearings for waste transfer "
0
stations? k '
11
• What is the process for requesting a public hearing?
• What are the regulations that apply to transfer stations?Do
they address your concerns. If not, why not?
• What is the permitting and regulatory process?Does regula-
tory authority rest with the state agency, a local agency or a
combination of the two? If located on a reservation, does
authority rest with the tribal council or another tribal envi-
ronmental entity?
• Where can the public review the state application for a waste
transfer station?
How do I get involved?
Form or join a community advisory panel.
A community advisory panel (CAP) should reflect local diversi-
ty and include residents, businesses, and industry. CAPS can
provide insight and external input and may oversee administra-
tion of host benefits or amenities agreed upon as part of siting
discussions. For instance, a CAP might be formed to administer
funds allocated for job training programs.
To formulate your position on the proposed waste transfer
station, review the information you have collected. Identify
operating and design measures that will protect the public
interest. Write down your concerns and thoughts in a concise,
logical, and constructive manner. Attempt to understand other
perspectives and acknowledge them while meeting your goals.
Select your best spokesperson to present your position at the
public meeting or hearing.
Attend public meetings or hearings.
Find answers to the following questions:
• What benefits would the waste transfer station provide?
• How will the waste transfer station affect the community and
the environment?
• How will the community be affected by truck traffic?
• What types of litter, noise, and vector controls will the facility
have?
12
• Will all waste be removed or containerized at the end of the
day?
• How will storm water and wash water runoff be managed?
• How will the community be economically impacted?
• What type of odor control will the facility have?
• How will the waste transfer station save you money?
• What potential hazards may be expected and how will they
be addressed?
• Does the community get any special benefits?
Secure follow-up on your concerns from the local
regulatory authority.
Ask questions such as the following:
• How will the local regulatory authority monitor resolution of
your concerns?
• When will you be able to
meet with project manage-
ment?
• Who will provide long-
V :
term oversight of facility operations? "T f
i
• What provisions are being _
made so that.the public �
can review the facility's ,=' �
operating history and per-
mit compliance after regu-
lar operations begin? �,
• Can the community be
involved in site inspec-
tions and reviews?
• Will the authority help schedule a visit to a similar facility?
13
What kinds of community benefits might be
negotiable?
Based on the experience of communities around the country,
there are many neighborhood benefits that can be negotiated if
you communicate and meet with the waste transfer station
developer. The range of community benefits depends on several
factors, including availability of alternate sites, population densi-
ty, land use of surrounding areas, and the economics of the pro-
posed facility. Benefits that communities have asked for include:
• Landscaping, lighting, and local park areas.
• Limitations on waste generation sources (e.g., off reservation,
out of county, out of state).
• Funding of public road/infrastructure improvements.
• Restrictions on truck traffic, including designated routing.
• Guaranteed preference to the community's residents for
employment.
• Commitment to regularly pick up litter and sweep streets in
and around the waste transfer station.
• Participation in site inspections and operation reviews.
• A hotline with the name and phone number of someone that
will act on and respond to complaints.
• Restrictions on operating hours.
• Commitment to cleaning up the tipping floor at day's end.
• Free or reduced-cost use of the facility for the community's
residents and businesses.
• Improvements to community schools, recreation programs,
fire department, etc.
• Free recyclables collection and/or processing.
• Guarantees for housing values.
• A fee paid to the local government for every ton of waste
received at the facility.
You can also negotiate to require that community representa-
tives have access to the facility during operations to monitor
14
_
Thanks to the Santa Fe, New Mexico,Solid Waste Management Division's door-to-
door informational campaign and the involvement of concerned citizens, the solid
waste transfer station was designed in a way aesthetically pleasing to the residents.City
officials responded to a number of citizen concerns regarding the design and proposed
operation of the transfer station,including a request for the transfer station to conform to
the stucco-and-tile architectural style prevalent in the Santa Fe area.
To inform residents about the proposed waste transfer station, which opened in 1997,
city officials conducted public hearings,met with neighborhood associations, and went
door-to-door distributing newsletters with proposed details on the transfer station's
design and how the decision-making process would be implemented.During the public
involvement process, residents expressed concerns regarding traffic impacts,stray litter,
odor and dust, and the visual affect of the transfer station.The city responded with a
number of changes that included:
• Building and upgrading roads to ensure large transfer trucks would travel north of the
neighborhood,away from major streets.
• Having crews daily pick up litter-that might glow or fall onto neighborhood streets.
• Washing down the transfer station twice each week and removing transfer station
waste at the end of each day.
• A powerful ventilation system to limit odors.
• Incorporating the design of the transfer station to be in the Santa Fe architectural style.
It is important to note that the citizens most affected by the transfer station had lived
for some time near the city's closed landfill.Over the years,city officials consistently
responded to citizen concerns about illegal dumping and stray litter from the landfill,
resulting in a positive, trusting relationship with the community.This relationship likely facil-
itated the public involvement process.
performance. Safety concerns and potential for interference
with daily operations must be addressed if this provision is
included.
} ; 4
Information Available From EPA
The following publications are available through the RCRA
Hotline. To order a document, call 800 424- 9346 (or 800 553-
7872 for the hearing-impaired). In Washington, DC, the number
15
is 703 412-9810 or TDD 703- 412-3323. The RCRAA Hotline is
open from Monday through Friday, 9 a.m. to 6 p.m., EST.
• Waste Transfer Stations: A Manual for Decision-Making
(EPA530-D-01-005) (Draft, February 2001.)
• Social Aspects of Siting RCRA Hazardous Waste Facilities
(EPA530-K-00-005.)
• Decision-Maker's Guide To Solid Waste Management
(EPA530-R-95-023)
• Sites for Our Solid Waste: A Guidebook for Effective
Public Involvement (EPA530-SW-90-019)
An initial siting choice for a waste transfer station in Leon County,,Florida,failed to gain
the approval of citizens and local business owners.In response,the county board
held a series of public meetings and workshops for almost a year, to evaluate approxi-
mately 15 potential alternative sites for the transfer station. Attended by hundreds of peo-
ple, this public process resulted in a final site selection, after which the county board
appointed a site development review committee whose mission was to develop operat-
ing and design criteria that would meet the needs of businesses and residents in this sub-
urban area of West Tallahassee.
The committee comprised a neighborhood association representative,a local business
representative,a university professor,a private consultant, and transportation, public
works,and solid waste officials from city and county government. The committee
requested transportation and noise studies to help it develop recommendations for
reducing the transfer station's environmental impacts.
The studies persuaded the county's solid waste department to change the transfer
station from a top-load to a compactor-type design that would reduce noise, building
height, and overall costs, plus provide for cleaner operations.The modified design also
made funds available to improve the sound absorption of the transfer station's interior
walls. The review committee also developed operating criteria addressing other potential
hazards and nuisances to the community. One requirement included having an industrial
hygienist monitor the safety of the transfer station annually.
To compensate the community for hosting the transfer station,the committee
approved a "host fee" of 50 cents per ton of waste. The community will use revenue
from this host fee,expected to generate$75,000 in the transfer station's first year of
operation, to pay for neighborhood improvements such as local sewer repairs.
Leon County's transfer station has yet to be built,however.Despite extensive public
involvement, a group of adjacent property owners is challenging the final site selection,
even though they participated in the decision-making process.
16
Additional Information from EPA
• The Model Plan for Public Participation, EPA National
Environmental Justice Advisory Council. Contact EPA Office
of Environmental Justice (http://es.epa.gov/oeca/main/ej/
nejacpub.html).
• Constructive Engagement Resource Guide:Practical Advice
for Dialogue Among Facilities,Workers, Communities, and
Regulators (EPA745-B-99-008)June 1999. Contact EPA's
National Service Center for Environmental Publications at
1-800-490-9198 or visit the Web at www.epa.gov/
staketiolders/siteguide.htm.
Other Selected Sources of Information
• Solid Waste Transfer in Illinois: A Citizen's Handbook on
Planning,.Siting and Technology. Contact Dupage County
Solid Waste Department, Wheaton Illinois. Telephone: 630
682-6755.
• National Environmental Justice Advisory Council
Regulatory Strategy for Siting and Operating Waste
Transfer Stations (report#500-R-00-001). Contact Kent
Benjamin at EPA at 202 260-2822 or visit the web at:
http://es.epa.gov/oeca/main/ej//ne,jacpx.ib.html.
Selected Internet Resources
• EPA's Office of Solid Waste (www.epa.gov/msw)
• EPA's Office of Environmental Justice
(http://es.epa.gov/oeca/main/ej/index.html)
• EPA's Office of Civil Rights (http://w-vvw.epa.gov/civitrights)
State Solid Taste Contacts
Alabama
Alabama Department of Environmental Management, Land
Division, Solid Waste Branch, P.O. Box 301463, Montgomery,AL
36130-1463. Phone: 334/271-7730, Fax: 334/279-3050
Alaska
Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation,
Environmental Health Division, Solid Waste Program, 410
17
Willoughby Avenue,Juneau,AK 99801-1795, Phone: 907/465-
5350, Fax: 907/465-5164
Arizona
Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, Waste Programs
Division, Solid Waste Section, 3033 North Central Avenue,
Phoenix,AZ 85012, Phone: 602/207-4208, Fax: 602/207-2383
Arkansas
Arkansas Department of Pollution Control and Ecology, Solid
Waste Division, P.O. Box 8913, Little Rock,AR 72219-8913,
Phone: 501/682-0600, Fax: 501/682-0611
California
California Integrated Waste Management Board, 8800 Cal
Center Drive, Sacramento, CA, 95826, Phone: 916/255-2182,
Fax: 916/255-2227
Colorado
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment,
Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division, 4300
Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, CO 80222-1530, Phone:
303/692-3300, Fax: 303/759-5355
Connecticut
Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau
of Waste Management, 79 Elm Street, 4th Floor, Hartford, CT
06106-5127, Phone: 860/424-3021, Fax: 860/424-4060
Delaware
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental
Control,Air and Waste Management.Division, Hazardous and
Solid Waste Management, 89 Kings Highway, Dover, DE 19901,
Phone: 302/739-4764, Fax: 302/739-5060
District of Columbia
DC Department of Public Works, Solid Waste Administration,
2750 South Capitol Street, S.E., Washington, D.C. 20032, Phone:
202/645-7044, Fax: 202/645-6040
Florida
Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Division of
Waste Management. Bureau of Solid & Hazardous Waste, Solid
Waste Management Section, 2600 Blair Stone Road, Tallahassee,
FL 32399-2400, Phone: 850/488-0300, Fax: 850/414-0414
18
Georgia
Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Environmental
Protection Division, Land Protection Branch, Solid Waste.
Management, 4244 International Parkway, Suite 104, Atlanta,
GA 30354, Phone: 404/362-2537, Fax: 404/362-2654
Hawaii
Hawaii Department of Health, Environmental Management
Division, Office of Solid Waste Management, 919 Ala Moana,
Room 300, Honolulu, HI 96814, Phone: 808/586-4250,
Fax: 808/586-4370
Idaho
Idaho Division of Environmental Quality, Solid Waste Program,
410 North Hilton Street, Boise, ID 83706, Phone: 208/373-0502,
Fax: 208/373-0417
Illinois
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Land, Solid
Waste Management Section, P.O. Box 19276, Springfield, IL
62794-9276, Phone: 217/785-9407, Fax: 217/557-4231
Indiana
Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of
Solid and Hazardous Waste Management, P.O. Box 6015,
Indianapolis, IN 46206-6015, Phone: 317/232-3210,
Fax: 317/232-3403
Iowa
Iowa Department of Natural
Resources, Land Quality
Bureau, Solid Waste Section, ''
900 East Grand Avenue,
Henry A. Wallace-Bldg., Des
Moines, IA 50319-0034, Phone:
515/281-4968, Fax: 515/281- �
8895
Kansas
Kansas Department of Health
and Environment, Division of
Environment. Bureau of Waste
Management, Forbes Field,
19
Building 283,Topeka, KS 66620, Phone: 785/296-1612,
Fax: 785/296-1592
Kentucky
Kentucky Department for Environmental Protection, Division of
Waste Management, Solid Waste Branch, Frankfort Office Park,
14 Reilly Road, Frankfort, KY 40601 Phone: 502/564-6716,
Fax: 502/564-4049
Louisiana
Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality, Office of Solid
and Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste Division, P.O. Box 82178,
Baton Rouge, LA 70884-2178, Phone: 225/765-0249,
Fax: 225/765-0299
Maine
Maine Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of
Remediation and Waste Management, Division of Solid Waste
Facilities Regulation, 17 State House Station, Augusta, ME
04333-0017, Phone:2 07/287-2651, Fax: 207/287-7826
Maryland
Maryland Department of the Environment, Waste Management
Administration, Solid Waste Program, 2500 Broening Highway,
Baltimore, MD 21224, Phone: 410/631-3304, Fax: 410/631-3321
Massachusetts
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau
of Waste Prevention, Solid Waste Division, One Winter Street,
Boston, MA 02108, Phone: 617/292-5953, Fax: 617/292-5778
Michigan
Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Waste
Management Division, Solid Waste Program, P.O. Box 30241,
Lansing, MI 48909, Phone: 517/335-9523, Fax: 517/373-4797
Minnesota
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Policy and Planning
Division, 520 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55155-4194,
Phone: 651/297-8502, Fax: 651/297-8676
Mississippi
Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality, Office of
Pollution Control, Solid Waste Management Branch, P.O. Box
20
10385,Jackson, MS 38289, Phone: 601/961-5171, Fax: 601/354-
6612
Missouri
Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Division of
Environmental Quality, Solid Waste Management Program, P.O.
Box 176,Jefferson City, MO 65102, Phone: 573/751-5401,
Fax: 573/526-3902
Montana
Montana Department of Environmental Quality, Permitting and
Compliance Division, P.O. Box 200901, Helena, MT 59620-0901,
Phone: 406/444-5270, Fax: 406/444-1374
Nebraska
Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality,Waste
Management Division, 1200 N Street, Suite 400, Lincoln, NE
68509-8922, Phone: 402/471-4210, Fax: 402/471-2909
Nevada
Nevada Division of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Waste
Management, Solid Waste Branch, 333 West Nye Lane, Capitol
Complex, Carson City, NV 89710, Phone: 702/687-4670,
Fax: 702/885-0868
New Hampshire
New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services,Waste
Management Division, 6 Hazen Drive, Concord, NH 03301-
6509, Phone: 603/271-2905, Fax: 603/271-2456
New Jersey
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Division
of Solid and Hazardous Waste, P.O. Box 414, Trenton, NJ 08625,
Phone: 609/984-6880, Fax: 609/984-6874
New Mexico
New Mexico Environment Department, Environmental
Protection Division, Solid Waste Bureau, 1190 St. Francis Dr.,
P.O. Box 26110, Santa Fe, NM 87503, Phone: 505/827-2855,
Fax: 505/827-2902
New York
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation,
Division of Solid & Hazardous Materials, 50 Wolf Road, Albany,
NY 12233-7250, Phone: 518/457-6934, Fax: 518/457-0629
21
North Carolina
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, Division of Waste Management, Solid Waste Section,
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, NC 27611-7687, Phone: 919/733-0692,
Fax: 919/733-4810
North Dakota
North Dakota Department of Health, Division of Waste
Management, P.O. Box 5520, Bismarck, ND 58506-5520, Phone:
701/328-5166, Fax: 701/328-5200
Ohio
Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Division of Solid and
Infectious Waste Management P.O. Box 163669, Columbus, OH
43216-3669, Phone: 614/728-5333. Fax: 614/728-5315
Oklahoma
Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality, Waste
Management Division, P.O. Box 1677, Oklahoma City, OK
73102, Phone: 405/702-5100, Fax: 405/702-5101
Oregon
Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, Waste
Management and Cleanup Division Solid Waste Planning &
Program Development Section, 811 S.W. Sixth Avenue, Portland,
OR 97204, Phone: 503/229-5072, Fax: 503/229-6977
Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau
of Land Recycling and Waste Management, Division of
Municipal and Residual Waste, P.O. Box 8471,Harrisburg, PA
17105-8471, Phone: 717/787-2388, Fax: 717/787-1904
Rhode Island
Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management,
Division of Waste Management. 235 Promenade Street,
Providence, RI 02908, Phone: 401/222-4700, Fax: 401/222-3813
South Carolina
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental
Control, Bureau of Solid and Hazardous Waste Management,
Division of Solid Waste Management, 2600 Bull Street
Columbia, SC 29201, Phone: 803/896-4007, Fax: 803/896-4001
22
South Dakota
South Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, Division of Environmental Services, Waste
Management Program, 523 East Capitol, Foss Bldg., Pierre, SD
57501-3181, Phone: 605/773-3153, Fax: 605/773-4068
Tennessee
Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation,
Division of Solid and Hazardous Waste Management, Solid
Waste Management Unit, 5th Floor, 1_, & C Tower, 401 Church
Street, Nashville, TN 37243-1535, Phone: 615/532-0780,
Fax: 615/532-0886
Texas
TX Natural Resource Conservation Commission, Permits
Division, P.O. Box 13087,Austin, TX 78711-3087, Phone:
512/239-6787, Fax: 512/239-2007
Utah
Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Solid
and Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste Section, P.O. Box 144880,
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4880. Phone: 801/538-6170,
Fax: 801/538-6715
Vermont
Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation,Waste
Management Division, Solid Waste Management, 103 South
Main Street, Waterbury,VT 05671-0404, Phone: 802/241-3444,
Fax: 802/241-3296
Virginia
Virginia Department of Environmental Quality,Waste Division,
P.O. Box 10009, Richmond, VA 23240-0009, Phone: 804/698-
4221, Fax: 804/698-4234
Washington
Washington State Department of Ecology, Waste Management
Programs, Solid Waste and Financial Services Program, P.O. Box
47600, Olympia, WA 98504-7600, Phone: 360/407-6103,
Fax: 360/407-6102
West Virginia
West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, Office
of Waste Management, Solid Waste Management Section, 1356
23
Hansford Street, Charleston, WV 25301-1401, Phone: 304/558-
5929, Fax: 304/558-0256
Wisconsin
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources,Air and Waste
Division, Bureau of Waste Management, P.O. Box 7921, Madison,
WI 53707, Phone: 608/266-1327, Fax: 608/267-2768
Wyoming
Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality, Solid and
Hazardous Waste Division, 122 West 25th Street, Cheyenne, WY
82002, Phone: 307/777-7752, Fax: 307/777-5973
American Samoa
Environmental Quality Commission,American Samoan
Government, Department of Public Works, Pago Pago,American
Samoa 96799, Phone: 684/633-4141, Fax: 684/633-5801
Guam
Guam Environmental Protection Agency,Air and Land
Division, P.O. Box 22439, GMF Barrigada, Guam 96921, Phone:
671/475-1658, Fax: 671/477-9402
Northern Mariana Islands
Division of Environmental Quality. Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands, 3rd Floor, Morgen's Bldg., San Jose,
P.O. Box 1304, Saipan, MP 96950, Phone: 670/234-6114,
Fax: 670/234-1003
Puerto Rico
Environmental Quality Board, Office of the Governor, Land
Pollution Area, P.O. Box 11488, Santurce, PR 00910, Phone:
787/763-4448, Fax: 787/766-0150
Virgin Islands
Department of Planning and Natural Resources, Government of
the Virgin Islands, Division of Environmental Protection,
Building 111, Apartment 114, Christiansted, St. Croix, VI 00820,
Phone: 809/773-0565, Fax: 809/773-9310
24
United States
Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW (5306W)
Washington, DC 20460
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use$300
Esparza, Patty
From: Surf City Pipeline[noreply@user.govoutreach.com]
Sent: Monday, June 01, 2015 7:13 PM
To: CITY COUNCIL; Agenda Alerts
Subject: Surf City Pipeline: Comment on an Agenda Item (notification)
Request#22392 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Agenda Alerts.
Request type: Question
Request area: City Council -Agenda& Public Hearing Comments
Citizen name: Chris Byrne
Description: Good Evening
I am writing in support of OVSD's position with regard to the less than satisfactory
environment at the school as a result of the neighborhood waste-treatment facility. I
became interested when I saw a post by Chris Epting on the HBCF that asked the reader
to look the other way as Rainbow has been a'good citizen' in HB. I thought that curious
so I participated in the discussion that included over 1,000 comments before it was
pulled by the author. Why should whatever'good' Rainbow has done in the community
have any bearing on the issue at hand? The thread was nothing more, in my opinion,
than an attempt by Epting and others to intimidate and marginalize the OVSD advocate,
Gina Clayton-Tarvin. I won't bore you with examples but I was shocked by the amount
of vitriol hurled at her.
Consider that in 1981 that Rainbow's representative said, as Rainbow applied to the
Board of Zoning to expand its operation, 'odorous type materials are not highly resalable
and storage is difficult, therefore will not be accepting this type.'
Consider that in September of 2009 at a Waste Management Board meeting, this was the
background, 'Rainbow proposed to expand the daily receipt of waste 2,800 to 4,000
tons/day. .......The project included upgrades that will reduce noise, odor and emissions.
The upgrades include.....enclosing all recycling and waste handling activities.....'
Consider that a comment made by our City Attorney, Michael Gates, during this HBCF
thread that indicated, at least to me, that his predecessor as well as preceding councils
had largely ignored the pleas of OVSD regarding the oppressive odors and dust the
students were made to endure due to Rainbow processing out in the open.
Given the above considerations, how can we give any credence to the following 2013
statement attributed to Sue Gordon, VP of Rainbow, by The Independent, 'OVSD's
lawsuit against Rainbow Environmental Services is unfortunate, unnecessary and
unproductive. All they needed to do was meet with Rainbow to work on a resolution but
they chose to sue first.'
Rainbow probably has done some nice things in and for our city but they have failed this
part of our community which, up to now, has not had a voice. I think it is time that
Rainbow make good on implied promises.
Thanks
i