HomeMy WebLinkAboutFY 2010-2011 Mid-Year Budget Review and Comprehensive Annual Cl*ty of Huntington Beach
FY2010111 Mi*ds" Year
COMMUNICAinoN * 0
Da inan cisl Repo
Meedng
Agenda Item No. ' May 16, 2 011
q '` iltti'q ""ti
General Fund Revenue Profjection
DPW TOMM Mf SWUM TWSEVU amoli
MwAmcfl
Property Taxes $66,885,727
$66
60 3 Tax
5 2j,", 5
r. s,
IS,3' $4,
5
Transient - -5
slehtO
..........
15 0 0
-934�'� � 11�, "? �-
000
`5, ",,'6' 6, 5 erLocal:laxes 5 �7
7,
0
fi'4-�'5
PermitsLicense & 9 50,�`
':-F&f6iu� res` 3 965".325 , 4�,,3 73"5 0 Ole,,," 4: 3 0`08,500,�":
51
Use of Mone
1
'A�-Y - ,�
ProDert 13 680296:�-,--, 44-.3 77W ?2-959;960-��
Revenue from.,Ot 'er,
Q.-
�4,,P�50 0
boo,� ::
4.1,20 f5-3
Agencies S,
`7
7�
arges, or Services ; 22,723,753 2 3.,0 Y5'.9,29, 22,816,795 (199,134)a,
' 67Ot &Keyenue ' �2 I 020831 ` J,364 3
548 1;54
26 3,�,h '-'(TT'a"'fi§f6r 9 "0,
on7, pera i g,,
Otal
$193, 75,463,",`,�'
1,79��31'403-�179�4,56'940 ,
IW648.97
% N10ther Local Taxes includes Utility Taxes and Franchises
V A
�,vx W6
Major Components of Revenue
Property Tax
Projected
FY 2005/06 FY 2006/07 FY 2007/08 FY 2008/09 FY 2009/10 FY 2010/11
559167,632 60,607,078 65,110,424 67,226,812 6698859727 67,9509000
• Negative price pressures from distressed sales have continued to keep
assessed values for Huntington Beach almost flat
• Although nationally, sales of existing homes are up for the past 6
months through March, sales are still down 6.3% from last year
• The assessed value for the average Single Family Residence in
Huntington Beach is $555k, still down significantly from the peak of
$695k
• Fiscal Year 11/12 reflects a modest 0.70% increase based on the most
recent Assessed Valuations from the County Assessor
Maj* or Components of Revenue
SalesTax
Projected
FY 2005/06 FY 2006/07 FY 2007/08 FY 2008/09 FY 2009/10 FY 2010/11
*4:90 2,662 239724,067 1 23,934,392 20,306,313 0,795,316 21,200,000 J
• Trending up for Fiscal Year 10/11 , a trend which was anticipated
and is already included in revenue projections
• Sales Tax increases have been driven by auto sales, fuel and service
station gains in the 4th quarter of 2010
• National jobs report for April shows 240,000 jobs added; economic
analysts suggest 300,000 jobs added per month shows true growth
.ti
12
Maj* or Components of Revenue
TOT.
Projected
FY 2005/06 FY 2006/07 FY 2007/08 FY 2008/09 FY 2009/10 FY 2010/11
5,9489888 6,573,507 6,68 :9428 59416,580 5,8199837 59950,000
• Hotel Industry has shown signs of a rebound over current fiscal year
• Occupancy in Huntington Beach up 11% for 2011 vs. 2010 while
average daily rates are up 11 .9% during this same period
• TOT has increased 19% over the past fiscal year, but still not at the all
time high
• If trends continue, TOT will likely end the year slightly above $6
million
1 13
General Fund Expense roj tions
[ff 21MM/M DFUMMEE WTIMEMB w TIME K fl MY% w. fpn�.
929- -3
J3- -1,26
ej`— $4,33�, -4 12%024,97
"6
Perg6nn
r.
0"1,6 91
"87 699,
4��,5
6 :0.8w,, 4, "'2'41;61:9' 48,
Transfers
-`"
Capital
1859,142� 2, ,OQQ,0 00�,
3,706,925'84 S 1,7, 9 ",'($2,A76
0 :
TAM" 8 643
54K," �181 603,
*Includes Carryover and Encumbrances
tit zz
\'V
14
FY2010/11 ral Find
18590009000
Property and
Sales Tax,
18090007000 TOT and Misc. $179,532,403 $179,127,204
Increases Carryover/Encumbrances
175 ,0009000 $177,938,548 $177,938,548
170,000,000
165 ,000,000
160,0009000
1 5 5 ,000,000
1507000,000
General Fund Revenue General Fund Expenditures
L ❑Adopted Budget ® Projected as of 3/31/11
�l r ? 15
summary
Recap Of FY 2009/2010
Status Of Reserve Fund Balances
� FY 2010/2011 Mid-Year Update
� FY 2 11/2012 Budget Development Timeline
� Next Steps
l 4 2
FY 2009/2010
(Audite d)
Gwo (Ymn Irmo (fl kdlo)lpqa OMIFVMANIF�
5 �6
X --,-,-4 38�
29�245
S181,3333,
E D' e' A'�`e
0
TOTAL $ 11,458 $ 2,265 S k
-$,2",25 4, 1,03 /0,
-CONT-R IB U,,T Sf GTACTO� '
-----------
st
'f PARS',,,,,A",n Pavm,
Deferral
R y
( UP$,,L/`5,8 6,,,7,6 7
E 71
Xpennure�Savings (678
General Fund Reserve Balance
(In Thousands)
MOM 0 mDm®w
October 1, 2005 38,286
October 1; 2006 40,5186
October l;-2007 43,69.E y
October 1, 20081 44,443
October 1, 2009 39,088
October l,'20-1.0 41,352
Annual Change :.$29264.
No current plans to use reserved fund balance to balance FY 207..01207 7 ,budget
General Fund deserve Balance
(In Thousands)
Econornlc tJncertamties 1s9,710 3
Equlprrient.Replacement, 6,913
E
Capital Prgjects 2,970
PARS Obligation 3,549
Other Fund balance;* 824,
®t1u balance 41352
Includes,other non-spendable, restricted, committed, and assigned fund
balances not listed.
11 i ,g771 l L
S
Y
FY 2009/2010 Au
� New auditing firm of Macias, Gini & O'Connell
audited City's financial performance and reports
� FY 2009/2010 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
received an Unqualified (Clean) Audit Opinion
� The City's CAFR is award winning — has received the
Government Finance Officers Association's (GFOA)
Excellence in Financial Reporting Award for 24 years
FY 2010/201.1 Mid Year Update
� General Fund Revenue Performance
� General Fund Expenditure Performance
� Year-End Projections and Options
Highlights of Governor's May Revise - FY 2011/2 12
Revenues, where we have been . . .
General Fund Revenues
(in thousands)
$195,000
$1859198 $M9
$1801000 $1679090
$1655000 + —+5%o_ -2% 0% o
• -1 /o +2%
$15 0,000
05/06 06/07
07/08 08/09
09/10 10/11
11/12
year over year change
t
Revenues, where we are headed . . .
� Revenue projections trending positively and expecting to end the
year at approximately $180 million
� The UCLA Anderson School's California Economic report states that
real personal income growth is forecasted to be 3.7% and 4. 1% in
2012 and 2013
� However, a real estate and housing development comeback, coupled
with a decrease in unemployment and business development is
needed for true sustainable economic growth in Huntington Beach
Current estimates reflect an additional $3 million in General Fund
revenue next year for a total of $ 183 million in FY 2011/2012
FY 20 Recap
Current fiscal year projected to end in balance
Should funding remain at year-end consider the
following option:
• Staff recommends paying down the remaining $6 million
PARS Annuity Obligation
• Requires a minor amendment to existing Financial
Policies
N, e
4
-, ` 16
FY 2011/12 Projected Budget
Despite increasing revenue, the City is still projected to face an
estimated $3 million to $4 million challenge in FY2011/12
Departments have been requested to provide Level 1 cuts for $3.5
million and Level 2 cuts for an additional $1 .5 million for a total of
$5.0 million in solutions
Optimistic revenue projections of an additional $3 million are already
factored into preliminary estimates for next year's budget
Factors contributing to next year's challenge include: previously
negotiated salary increases; significant pension cost increases of $5
million in FY 11/12 and an additional $8 million in FY 12/13; and
increased equipment investments
17
Negotiated Salary Increases FY 10/11- FY 11/12
QED
HBFA 2.5% effective 3/21/11 $233,500 $480,400 $178,000
2.0% effective 9/30/11 $394,000 $181,600
Subtotal $2339500 $8749400 $359,600
MEA 2.5% effective 7/1/11 $142,800 $572,600 $158,000
1.0% effective 1/1/12 $176,200 $218,200
Subtotal $142,800 $7489800 $3769200
FMA 2.0% effective 7/1/11 $7,300 $29,400 $13,500
2.0% effective 1/1/12 $22,500 $21,300
Subtotal
Fiscal Year Totals $3839600 $1,6759100 $770,600
Cumulative Totals $383,600 $290589700 $2,8299300
18
1"
FY 2011/2012 State Budget Upd ate
(Revised)
� May 16, 2011 - Governor's May Revise unveiled
� Revised $26.6 billion shortfall
$11.0 billion in cuts already approved for July 1 St
$6.6 billion in higher revenues assumed but allocates $3 billion more to
education, public safety and litigation costs
$10.8 billion in solutions still needed to address:
-$9.6 billion shortfall
-$1.2 billion reserve
p Higher revenues to reduce temporary taxes by $2 e 9 billion
p Governor still calls for elimination of Redevelopment Agencies
Eliminates 43 Boards, Commissions, Task Forces, Offices and
Departments
Eliminates 5,500 State jobs
r
9
_� 19
FY 2011 /2012 State Budget Up d
e
� May 16, 2011 - Governor's May Revise eiled
> Initial $25.4 billion shortfall reporte �anuary
� $ 11 .2 billion in cuts already ap ved for July 1st
> $ 15 .2 billion in solutions st' needed to address
remaining shortfall, inch ding a S
1 billion reserve
� $2 billion in addit' al income tax revenue received
> Approximat $??? ($ 13 .2) billion still to be
resolve
� Po�t ial Redevelopment Agency elimination or
�r,�'duction by the State still under consideration
FY 2011/2012 BUDGET TIMELINE
(Tentative)
ho 0 0 wd Om
o
June l t - June 30, 2011 Internal Budget Development and Finalization
July 2011 . _ Budget Study Session(s)
August 15, 2011 Proposed FY 2011/2012�Budget to City Council
August 31, 2011 Charter Deadline to Submit Budget to City Council
September.5.; 2011 Potential Budget.Adoption Dates
September, l9, 20,11 (Regularly_ Scheduled City Council Meetings)
Septemlber 30, 2011 ; Charter Deadline to Adopt the FY 2011/2012 Budget
®ctOber 1.9 2011 , New Fiscal Year begins ..
Next Steps
Obtain City Council direction regarding Budget
solutions :
o Reflect $3.5 million in cost reductions to balance projected
preliminary shortfall (i.e. Level One Cuts Only)
o Reflect $5.0 million in total savings to provide a contingency for:
• Unexpected revenue shortfalls
• State takeaways (including redevelopment decreases or elimination)
• Changes to FY 12/13 PENS rates or discount rate assumptions
• Begin addressing FY 12/13 and further out-year challenges
• Other unanticipated events
o Reflect $8.0 million in total savings to help achieve a potential 2-
year Budget Solution
21
Cl*ty of Huntington
10 awYear
FY2010111 Mid,
® 0
Inancial
May 16, 2011
OX=� k
TFB f7, 90