Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Approve Fiscal Year 2017-18 Annual Compliance Reports for Pu
Development Impact Fee Report Fiscal Year End June 30, 2oi8 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach, CA. City of Huntington Beach Development Impact Fee Report Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2oi8 Submitted by Gilbert Garcia, Chief Financial Officer CityCouncil Directory................................................................................................I City Officials Directory...............................................................................................III TransmittalLetter...........................................................................................................1 Introduction Legal Requirements for Development Impact Fee Reporting.....................................3 Description of Development Impact Fees...................................................................5 Development Impact Fee Master Fee Schedule.........................................................9 Development Impact Fee Report Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Summary ....... 11 Financial Summary Report Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fee ............................13 Police Facilities Development Impact Fee..................................................................15 Fire Facilities Development Impact Fee......................................................................17 Library Development Impact Fee................................................................................19 Planned Local Drainage Facilities Fund.....................................................................21 Sanitary Sewer Facilities Fund...................................................................................25 Fair Share Traffic Impact Mitigation Fee Program......................................................31 Development Impact Fee Project Identification CIP.............................................................................................................................35 Council Action Request for Council Action.........................................................................................39 Resolution 2012.23 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report ............ 48 Ordinance 3942 — Police Facilities Development Impact Fee.....................................75 Ordinance 3943 — Fire Facilities Development Impact Fee........................................86 Ordinance 3944 — Fair Share Traffic Impact Mitigation Fee Program .........................97 Ordinance 3945 — Library Development Impact Fee..................................................113 Ordinance 3946 — Parkland Acquisition & Park Facilities Development Impact Fee ... 123 Ordinance 3947 — General Provisions for Development Impact Fees .........................134 Comparison of Current vs. Proposed Development Impact Fees...............................142 Master Facilities Plan.................................................................................................146 Development Impact Fee Calculation & Nexus Report ...............................................242 328 Intentionally Left Blank ��N11NGT� ti 9 n U 1 Y 0 O� cF�OLNTY CA��F Jill Hardy Council Member Mike Posey Mayor Lyn Semeta Council Member Erik Peterson Mayor Pro Tern Patrick Brenden Council Member Barbara Delgleize Billy O'Connell Council Member Council Member Rate Structure Fiscal Year 2017/18 CITY SEWER CONNECTION FEES Effective October 1, 2017 Single Family Dwelling Unit $ 21317 Multiple Family Dwelling Unit 1,895 Non -Residential (based on water meter size relationship to Equivalent Dwelling Unit, EDU ) Meter Size & Type EDU's Charge 3/4" _ 1 $ 2,663 ill 2 $ 5,267 1 Y2" 3 $ 7,901 2" 5 $ 13,170 3" 11 $ 28,974 4" Compound 17 $ 44,776 4" Domestic & Turbine 33 $ 86,919 6" Compound 33 $ 86,919 6" Domestic & Turbine 67 $ 176,469 8" Domestic 117 $ 308,163 10" Domestic 183 $ 479,241 nvironmental Status: Not applicable. Attachments: None 362 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 5/07/2012 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL 2012-007 Attachment(s): No. Resolution No. 2012 - 23 "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Description Beach adopting the Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report for the City of Huntington Beach, and establishing new and revised Development Impact Fees." 2 Ordinance No. 3942 "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach amending the Huntington Beach Municipal Code by adding Chapter 17.75 relating to Development Impact Fees for Police Facilities ." 3 Ordinance No. 3943 "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach amending the Huntington Beach Municipal Code by adding Chapter 17.74 relating to Development Impact Fees for Fire Facilities." 4. Ordinance No. 3944 "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach amending Chapter 17.65 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code relating to Traffic Impact Fees." 5 Ordinance No. 3945 "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach deleting Chapter 17.66 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code and adding Chapter 17.67 relating to Library Development Impact Fees." 6 Ordinance No. 3946 "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach amending the Huntington Beach Municipal Code by adding Chapter 17.76 relating to Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fees." 7 Ordinance No. 3947 "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach amending the Huntington Beach Municipal Code by adding Chapter 17.73 relating to the General Provisions for Development Impact Fees." 8. Comparison of Current vs. Proposed Development Impact Fees 9. Master Facilities Plan, prepared by Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. October2011, Amended April 27, 2012 10. Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report, prepared by Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.0 October 2011, Amended April 27, 2012 379 HB -143- Item 9. - 8 Resolution No. 2012-23 Exhibit A: Staff Recommendation Schedule of Rates for Traffic Impact Fees (Effective 9/2/2012) Land Use Detached Dwelling Unit Apartment Condominium/Townhou se Mobile Home Dwelling Adjusted I Average I Trip -end to I Additional I Cost per I Cost per 1000 sq. ft, Trip Ends I Distance Trip Trip Miles I Trip Mile I dwelling unit or other unit ES (per Unit) 8.76 7.9 0.5 34.6 S 50.22 $ 1,737.61 /Unit 6.15 7.9 0.5 24.3 S 50.22 $ 1,220.35 /Unit 5.36 7.9 0.5 21.2 $ 50.22 $ 1,064.66 /Unit 1 4.571 7.9 'RESORT/TOURIST (per Unit or Entry Door) Hotel 6.29 7.6 All Suites Hotel 3.77 7.6 M otel 4.34 7.6 IN WRIAL ( per 1000SF) iGeneral Light Industrial 6.17 9.0 Heavy Industrial 5.97 9.0 Manufacturing 2.73 9.0 (Warehousing 4.39 9.0 COMMERCIAL (per 1,000 Office Park Research Park Business Park Bldg. Materials/Lumber Store Garden Center Movie Theater Church Medical -Dental Office General Office Building Shopping Center Hospital Discount Center High -Turnover Restaurant Convenience Market 'Office Park IOTHERT(as noted) Cemetery Service Station/Market Service Station w/Car Wash 0.51 18.11 S 50.22 1 S 908.98 1 /Unit 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 7.42 8.81 0.5 5.01 8.8 0.5 9.34 8.81 0.5 29.351 4.3 23.45 2.47 5.92 22.21 7.16 30.2 11.42 62.93 8.9 43.57 13.97 99.35 23.9 S 64.34 S 1,537.73 /Room 14.3 S 64.34 $ 920.06 /Room 16.5 $ 64.34 $ 1,061.61 /Room 27.8 $ 64.34 $ 1,788.65 /1,000 sf 26.9 $ 64.34 $ 1,730.75 /1,000 sf 12.3 $ 64.34 $ 791.38 /1,000 sf 19.81 $ 64.34 $ 1,273.93 /1, 000 sf 32.6 $ 64.34 $ 2,097.48 /1,000 sf 22.0 $ 64.34 $ 11415.48 /1,000 sf 41.1 $ 64.34 $ 2,644.37 /1,000 sf 0.51 63.11 $ 64.34 1 $ 4.059.85 1 /1,000 sf 4.3 0.5 50.4 S 64.34 $ 4.3 0.5 5.3 $ 64.34 $ 4.3 0.5 i 2.7 $ 64.34 $ 8.8 0.5 97.7 S 64.34 $ 8.8 0.5 31.5 S 64.34 $ 4.3 0.5 64.9 $ 64.34 $ 4.3 0.5 24.6 S 64.34 $ 4.3 0.5 135.3 $ 64.34 $ 4.3 0.5 19.1 $ 64.34 $ 4.31 0.5 9171 S 64.34 $ 4.31 0.5 30.01 S 64.34 $ 4.3 0.5 &1331 $ 64.34 $ 4.3 0.5 231.5 $ 64.34 1 $ 431 0.5 213.61 $ 64.34 I $ 3,242.74 /1,000 sf 341.00 /1,000 sf 817.12 /1,000 sf 6,286.02 /1,000 sf 2,026.71 /1,000 sf 4,175.67 /1,000 sf 1,582.76 /1,000 sf 8,705.20 /1,000 sf 1,228.89 /1,000 sf 6,028.66 /1000 sf 1,930.20 /1,000 sf 424.64 /Acre 14,894.71 /Fuel Position 13,743.02 /Fuel Position Resolution No. 2012-23 Exhibit A: Staff Recommendation Schedule of Rates for Traffic Impact Fees (Effective 9/2/2013) Land Use Adjusted Trip Ends Average Distance Trip -end to Trip Additional Trip Miles Cost per Trip Mile Cost per 1000 sq. ft, dwelling unit or other unit RESIDENTIAL LAND USES (per Unit) Detached Dwelling Unit 8.76 7.9 0.5 34.6 $ 57.39 $ 1,985.69 /Unit Apartment 6.15 7.9 0.5 24.3 $ 57.39 $ 1,394.58 /Unit Condominium/ Townhouse 5.36 7.9 0.5 21.2 $ 57.39 $ 1,216.67 /Unit Mobile Home Dwelling 4.57 7.9 0.5 18.1 $ 57.39 $ 1,038.76 /Unit RESORT/TOURIST (per.Umt or:Ent' Door) '$ Hotel 6.29 7.6 0.5 23.9 64.34 $ 1,537.73 /Room All Suites Hotel 3.77 7.6 0.5 14.3 $ 64.34 $ 920.06 /Room Motel 4.34 7.6 0.5 16.5 $ 64.34 $ 1,061.61 /Room 'INDUSTRIAL (per,1;000 General Light Industrial SF) 6.17 9.0 0.5 27.8 $ 64.34 $ 1,788.65 /1,000 sf Heavy Industrial 5.97 9.0 0.5 26.9 $ 64.34 $ 1,730.75 /1,000 sf Manufacturing 2.73 9.0 0.5 12.3 $ 64.34 $ 791.38 /1,000 sf Warehousing 4.39 9.0 0.5 19.8 $ 64.34 $ 1,273.93 /1,000 sf COMMERCIAL (per 1,000 SF) , Office Park 7.42 8.8 0.5 32.6 $ 64.34 $ 2,097.48 /1,000 sf Research Park 5.01 8.8 0.5 22.0 $ 64.34 $ 1,415.48 /1,000 sf Business Park 9.34 8.8 0.5 41.1 $ 64.34 $ 2,644.37 /1,000 sf Bldg. Materials/Lumber Store 29.35 4.3 0.5 63.1 $ 64.34 $ 4,059.85 /1,000 sf Garden Center 23.45 4.3 0.5 50.4 $ 64.34 $ 3,242.74 /1,000 sf Movie Theater 2.47 4.3 0.5 5.3 $ 64.34 $ 341.00 /1,000 sf Church 5.92 4.3 0.5 12.7 $ 64.34 $ 817.12 /1,000 sf Medical -Dental Office 22.21 8.8 0.5 97.7 $ 64.34 $ 6,286.02 /1,000 sf General Office Building 7 16 8.8 0.5 31.5 $ 64.34 $ 2,026.71 /1,000 sf Shopping Center 30.2 4.3 0.5 64.9 $ 64.34 $ 4,175.67 /1,000 sf Hospital 11.42 4.3 0.5 24.6 $ 64.34 $ 1,582.76 /1,000 sf Discount Center 62.93 4.3 0.5 135.3 $ 64.34 $ 8,705,20 /1,000 sf High -Turnover Restaurant 8.9 4.3 0.5 19.1 $ 64.34 $ 1,228.89 /1,000 sf Convenience Market 43.57 4.3 0.5 93.7 $ 64.34 $ 6,028.66 /1,000 sf Office Park 13.97 4.3 0.51 30.0 $ 64.34 $ 1,930.20 1 /1,000 sf QTHER (as;noted) w Cemetery 3.07 4.3 0.5 6.6 $ 64.34 $ 424.64 /Acre Service Station/Market 107.69 4.3 0.5 231.5 $ 64.34 $ 14,894.71 /Fu l tion Service Station w/Car Wash 99.35 4.3 0.5 213.6 $ 64.34 $ 13,743.02 /Fuel Position 390 Resolution No. 2012-23 Exhibit A: Staff Recommendation Schedule of Rates for Traffic Impact Fees (Effective 9/2/2014) Land Use Adjusted Trip Ends Average Distance Trip -end to Trip Additional Trip Miles Cost per Trip Mile Cost per 1000 sq. ft, dwelling unit or other unit RESIDENTIAL. LAND USES'(per`Unit) Detached Dwelling Unit 8.76 7.9 0.5 34.6 S 64.34 $ 2,226.16 /Unit Apartment 6.15 7.9 0.5 24.3 $ 64.34 $ 1,563.46 /Unit Condominium/ Townhouse 5.36 T9 0.5 21.2 $ 64.34 $ 1,364.01 /Unit Mobile Home Dwelling 4.57 -f 1 7.9 0.5 18.1 $ 64.34 $ 1,164.55 /Unit RESORT/TOURIST (per Unit or Entry.Door), Hotel 6.29 7.6 0.5 23.9 $ 64.34 $ 1,537.73 /Room All Suites Hotel 3.77 7.6 0.5 14.3 $ 64.34 $ 920.06 /Room Motel 4.34 7.6 0.5 16.5 $ 64.34 $ 1,061.61 /Room INDUSTRIAL ( per 1,000 SF)' General Light Industrial 6.17 9.0 0.5 27.8 $ 64.34 $ 1,788.65 /1,000 sf Heavy Industrial 5.97 9.0 0.5 26.9 $ 64.34 $ 1,730.75 /1,000 sf Manufacturing 2.73 9.0 0.5 12.3 $ 64.34 $ 791.38 /1,000 sf Warehousing 4.39 9.01 0.5 19.8 $ 64.34 $ 1,273.93 /1,000 sf COMMERCIAL (per 1,000$' TO - Office Park 7.42 8.8 0.5 32.6 $ 64.34 S 2,097.48 /1,000 sf Research Park 5.01 8.8 0.5 22.0 $ 64.34 $ 1,415.48 /1,000 sf Business Park 9.34 8.8 0.5 41.1 $ 64.34 $ 2,644.37 /1,000 sf Bldg. Materials/Lumber Store 29.35 4.3 0.5 63.1 $ 64.34 $ 4,059.85 /1,000 sf Garden Center 23.45 4.3 0.5 50A $ 64.34 $ 3,242.74 /1,000 sf Movie Theater 2.47 4.3 0.5 5.3 $ 64.34 $ 341.00 /1,000 sf Church 5.92 4.3 0.5 12.7 $ 64.34 $ 817.12 /1,000 sf Medical -Dental Office 22.21 8.8 0.5 97.7 $ 64.34 $ 6,286.02 /1,000 sf General Office Building 7.16 8.8 0.5 31.5 S 64.34 $ 2,026.71 /1,000 sf Shopping Center 30.2 4.3 0.5 64.9 $ 64.34 $ 4,175.67 /1,000 sf Hospital 11.42 4.3 0.5 24.6 $ 64.34 $ 1,582.76 /1,000 sf Discount Center 62.93 4.3 0.5 135.3 S 64.34 $ 8,705.20 /1,000 sf High -Turnover Restaurant 8.9 4.3 0.5 19.1 S 64.34 $ 1,228.89 /1,000 sf Convenience Market 1 43.57 4.3 0.5 93.7 $ 64.34 $ 6,028.66 /1,000 sf Office Park 13.97 4.31 0.5 30.0 $ 64.34 $ 1,930.20 /1,000 sf OTHER (as noted) Cemetery 3.07 4.3 0.5 6.6 $ 64.34 $ 424.64 /Acre Service Station/Market a 107.69 4.3 0.5 231.5 $ 64.34 $ 14,894.71 /Fu el Position Service Station w/Car Wash 99.35 4.3 0.5 213,E $ 64.34 $ 13,743.02 /Fuel Position Resolution Xo. 2012-23 Exhibit A-1 Hansen -Alternative Fee Schedule No. 1 Schedule of Rates for Traffic Impact Fees (Effective 9/2/2014.) Land Use Adjusted Average Trip Ends Distance Trip -end to Trip Additional Trip Miles Cost per Trip Mile Cost per 1000 sq. ft, dwelling unit or other unit RESIDENTIAL LAND USES (per Unit) Detached Dwelling Unit 8.76 7.9 0.5 34.6 $ 64.34 $ 2,226.16 /Unit Apartment 6.15 7.9 0.5 24.3 $ 64.34 S 1,563.46 /Unit Condominium/ Townhouse 5.36 7.9 0.5 21.2 $ 64.34 S 1,364.01 /Unit Mobile Home Dwelling 4.57 7.9 0.5 18.1 $ 64.34 1 $ 1,164.55 /Unit RESORT/TOURIST (per Unit or Entry Door) Hotel 6.29 7.6 0.5 23.9 $ 64.34 $ 1,537.73 /Room All Suites Hotel 3.77 7.6 0.5 14.3 $ 64.34 $ 920.06 /Room Motel 4.34 7.6 0.5 16.5 $ 64.34 $ 1,061.61 /Room INDUSTRIAL ( per 1,000 SF) General Light Industrial 6.17 9.0 0.5 27.8 $ 64.34 $ 1,788.65 /1,000 sf Heavy Industrial 5.97 9.0 0.5 26.9 $ 64.34 $ 1,730.75 /1,000 sf Manufacturing 2.73 9.0 0.5 12.3 $ 64.34 $ 791.38 /1,000 sf Warehousing 4.391 9.01 0.51 19.8 $ 64.34 1 $ 1,273.93 /1,000 sf COMMERCIAL (per 1,000 SF) Office Park 7.42 8.8 0.5 32.6 S 64.34 S 2.097.48 /1,000 sf Research Park 5.01 8.8 0.5 22.0 $ 64.34 $ 1,415.48 11,000 sf Business Park 9.34 8.8 0.5 41.1 $ 64.34 $ 2,644.37 /1,000 sf Bldg. Materials/Lumber Store 29.35 4.3 0.5 63.1 $ 64.34 $ 4,059.85 /1,000 sf Garden Center 23.45 4.3 0.5 50.4 $ 64.34 $ 3.242.74 /1,000 sf Movie Theater 2.47 4.3 0.5 5.3 $ 64.34 $ 341.00 /1,000 sf Church 5.92 4.3 0.5 12.7 $ 64.34 $ 817.12 /1,000 sf Medical -Dental Office 22.21 8.8 0.5 97.7 $ 64.34 $ 6,286.02 /1,000 sf General Office Building 7.16 8.8 0.5 31.5 S 64.34 $ 2,026.71 /1,000 sf Shopping Center 30.2 4.3 0.5 64.9 $ 64.34 $ 4,175.67 /1,000 sf Hospital 11.42 4.3 0.5 24.6 $ 64.34 $ 1,582.76 /1,000 sf Discount Center 62.93 4.3 0.5 135.3 $ 64.34 $ 8,705.20 /1,000 sf High -Turnover Restaurant 8.9 4.3 0.5 19.1 $ 64.34 $ 1,228.89 /1,000 sf Convenience Market 43.57 4.3 0.5 93.7 $ 64.34 $ 6,028.66 /1,000 sf Office Park 113.97 4.3 0.51 30.0 $ 64.34 $ 1,930.20 /1,000 sf OTHER (as noted) 4v - Cemetery 3.07 4.3 0.5 6.6 $ 64.34 $ 424.64 /Acre Service Station/Market (av) 107.69 4.3 0.5 231.5 $ 64.34 $ 14,894.71 /Fuel Position Service Station w/Car Wash 99.35 4.3 0.5 213.6 $ 64.34 $ 13,743.02 /Fuel Position Exhibit A-2 Dwyer -Alternative Fe�eS 441'1;94461222' Schedule of Rates for Traffic Impact Fees (Effective 9/2/2012) Land Use Adjusted Trip Ends Average Distance Trip -end to Trip Additional Trip Miles Cost per Trip Mile Cost per 1000 sq. ft, dwelling unit or other unit 25% Increase Scenario Cost per 1000 sq. ft, dwelling unit or other unit RESIDENTIAL LAND 11SES (per Unit) . Detached Dwelling Unit 8.76 7.9 0.5 34.6 $ 50.22 $ 1,737.61 /Unit $ 1,685.58 /Unit Apartment 6.15 7.9 0.5 24.3 $ 50.22 $ 1,220.35 /Unit $ _ 1,184.22 /Unit Condom inium/Townho use 5.36 7.9 0.5 21.2 $ 50.22 S 1,064.66 /Unit $ 1,032.44 /Unit Mobile Home Dwelling 4.57 7.9 0.5 18.1 $ 50.22 $ 908.98 /Unit $'. 880.67'` /Unit RESORT/TOURIST (per Unit or;Entry Door) Hotel 6.29 7.6 0.5 23.9 S 64.34 $ 1,537.73 /Room $ 1,195 W /Room All Suites Hotel 3.77 7.6 0.5 14.3 $ 64.34 S 920.06 /Room $ 716,35 /Room Motel 4.34 7.6 0.5 16.5 $ 64.34 $ 1,061.61 /Room $ 825.26 /Room INDUSTRIAL ( per 1,000 SF) General Light Industrial 6.17 9.0 0.5 27.8 $ 64.34 $ 1,788.65 /1,000 sf $. 1,243.109 /1,000 sf Heavy Industrial 5.97 9.0 0.5 26.9 S 64.34 $ 1,730.75 /1,000 sf $ 1,202.82 /1,000 sf Manufacturing 2.73 9.0 0.5 12.3 $ 64.34 $ 791.38 i /1,000 sf $ 550.02 /1,000 sf Warehousing 4.39 9.0 0.5 19.8 $ 64.34 $ 1,273.93 /1,000 sf $ 884.79 /1,000 sf COMMERCIAL (per 1,000 SF) Office Park 7.42 8.8 0.5 32.6 $ 64.34 $ 2,097.48 /1,000 sf $ 1,481.55 /1,000 sf Research Park 5.01 8.8 0.5 22.0 $ 64.34 $ 1,415.48 /1,000 sf $" 1,000.16 /1,000 sf Business Park 9.34 8.8 0.5 41.1 $ 64.34 $ 2,644.37 /1,000 sf $ 1,865.95 /1,000 sf Bldg. Materials/Lumber Store 29.35 4.3 0.5 63.1 $ 64.34 $ 4,059.85 /1,000 sf $ 4,059.85 /1,000 sf Garden Center 23.45 4.3 0.5 50.4 $ 64.34 $ 3,242.74 /1,000 sf $ 3.242.74 /1,000 sf Movie Theater 2.47 4.3 0.5 5.3 $ 64.34 $ 341.00 /1,000 sf $ 341.00 /1,000 sf Church 5.92 4.3 0.5 12.7 $ 64.34 $ 817.12 /1,000 sf $ 817.12 /1,000 sf Medical -Dental Office 22.21 8.8 0.5 97.7 $ 64.34 $ 6,286.02 /1,000 sf $ 41436,59 /1,000 sf General Office Building 7.16 8.8 0.5 31.5 $ 64.34 $ 2,026.71 /1.000 sf $ 1,430.32 /1,000 sf Shopping Center 30.2 4.3 0.5 64.9 S 64.34 S 4,175.67 /1,000 sf $ 4,175.67 /1,000 sf Hospital 11.42 4.3 0.5 24.6 S 64.34 $ 1,582.76 /1,000 sf $ 1,582.76 /1,000 sf Discount Center 62.93 4.3 0.5 135.3 $ 64.34 $ 8,705.20 /1,000 sf $ 8,705.20 11,000 sf High -Turnover Restaurant 8.9 4.3 0.5 19.1 $ 64.34 $ 1,228.89 /1,000 sf $ 1,228.89 /1,000 sf Convenience Market 43.57 4.3 0.5 93.7 $ 64.34 $ 6,028.66 /1,000 sf S 6,028.66 /1,000 sf Office Park 13.97 4.3 0.5 30.0 $ 64.34 $ 1,930.20 /1,000 sf $ 1,930.20 /1.000 sf OTHER (as noted) Cemetery 3.07 4.3 0.5 6.6 $ 64.34 $ 424.64 /Acre $ 424.64 !Acre Service Station/Market av 107.69 4.3 0.5 231.5 $ 64.34 $ 14,894.71 /Fuel PositionPosition $ 14,894.71 /Fuel Service Station w/Car Wash 99.35 4.3 0.5 213.6 $ 64.34 $ 13,743.02 /Fuel Position $ 13,743.02 /Fuel Position Resolution No. 2012-23 Exhibit A-2 Dwyer -Alternative Fee Schedule No. 2 Schedule of Rates for Traffic Impact Fees (Effective 9/2/2013) Land Use Adjusted Trip Ends Average Distance Trip -end to Trip Additional Trip Miles Cost per Trip Mile Cost per 1000 sq, ft, dwelling unit or other unit 50% Increase Scenario Cost per 1000 sq. ft, dwelling unit or other unit RESIDENTIAL LAND USES (per Unit) Detached Dwelling Unit 8.76 7.9 0.5 34.6 $ 57.39 $ 1,985.69 /Unit $ 1,866.44� /Unit Apartment 6.15 7.9 0.5 24.3 $ 57.39 $ 1,394.58 /Unit $ 1,310.63 /Unit Condominium/Townho use 5.36 7.9 0.5 21.2 $ 57.39 $ 1,216.67 /Unit $ 1,142.96 /Unit Mobile Home Dwelling 4.57 7.9 0.5 18.1 $ 57.39 $ 1,038.76 1 /Unit $ 975.30 !Unit RESORT[TOURIST (per:Unit or Entry' Door) Hotel 6.29 7.6 0.5 23.9 $ 64.34 $ 1,537.73 /Room $ 1,30980 /Room All Suites Hotel 3.77 7.6 0.5 14.3 $ 64.34 $ 920.06 /Room $ 784.25 /Room Motel 4.34 7.6 0.5 16.5 $ 64.34 $ 1,061.61 /Room $ 904.05 /Room INDUSTRIAL ( per 1000 SF) General Light Industrial 6.17 9.0 0.5 27.8 $ 64.34 $ 1,788.65 /1,000 sf $ 1,424.95 /1,000 sf Heavy Industrial 5.97 9.0 0.5 26.9 $ 64.34 $ 1,730.75 /1,000 sf .$ 1,378.:79 /1,000 sf Manufacturing 2.73 9.0 0.5 12.3 $ 64.34 $ 791.38 /1,000 sf : $ 630.47 /1,000 sf Warehousing 4.391 9.01 0.51 19.8 $ 64.34 1 $ 1,273.93 /1,000 sf $ 1,01451 /1,000 sf COMMERCIAL (per:1,000 SFj Office Park 7.421 8.8 0.5 32.6 $ 64.34 $ 2,097.48 /1,000 sf $ 1,686.86 /1,000 sf Research Park 5.01 8.8 0.5 22.0 $ 64.34 $ 1,415.48 /1,000 sf $ 1.138:.60 ` /1,000 sf Business Park 9.34 8.8 0.5 41.1 $ 64.34 $ 2,644.37 /1,000 sf $ 2,125.43 /1,000 sf Bldg. Materials/Lumber Store 29.35 4.3 0.5 63.1 $ 64.34 S 4,059.85 /1,000 sf $ 4,059.85 /1,000 sf Garden Center 23.45 4.3 0.5 50.4 $ 64.34 $ 3,242.74 /1,000 sf $ 3,242.74 /1,000 sf Movie Theater 2.47 4.3 0.5 5.3 $ 64.34 $ 341,00 11,000 sf $ 341.00 /1,000 sf Church 5.92 4.3 0.5 12.7 $ 64.34 $ 817.12 /1,000 sf $ 817.12 /1,000 sf Medical -Dental Office 22.21 8.8 0.5 97.7 $ 64.34 $ 6,286.02 /1,000 sf $ 5,053.07 /1,000 sf General Office Building 7.16 8.8 0.5 31.5 $ 64.34 $ 2,026.71 11,000 sf $ 1,629.12 /1,000 sf Shopping Center 30.2 4.3 0.5 64.9 $ 64.34 $ 4,175.67 /1,000 sf $ 4,175.67 /1,000 sf Hospital 11.42 4.3 0.5 24.6 $ 64.34 $ 1,582.76 /1,000 sf $ 1,582.76 /1,000 sf Discount Center 62.93 4.3 0.5 135.3 $ 64.34 $ 8,705.20 11,000 sf $ 8,705.20 /1,000 sf High -Turnover Restaurant 8.9 4.3 0.5 19.1 $ 64.34 $ 1,228.89 11,000 sf $ 1,228.89 /1,000 sf Convenience Market 43.57 4.3 0.5 93.7 $ 64.34 $ 6,028.66 11,000 sf $ 6,028.66 /1,000 sf Office Park 13.971 4.3 0.51 30.0 $ 64.34 $ 1,930.20 1 /1,000 sf $ 1,930.20 /1,000 sf OTHER .(as noted) Cemetery 3.07 4.3 0.5 6.6 $ 64.34 $ 424.64 /Acre $ 424.64 /Acre Service Station/Market av 107.69 4.3 0.5 231.5 $ 64.34 $ 14,894.71 /Fuel Position $ 14,894.71 /Fuel Position Service Station w/Car Wash 99.35 4.3 0.5 213.6 $ 64.34 $ 13,743.02 /Fuel Position $ 13,743.02 /Fuel Position 399 Resolution No. 2012-23 Exhibit A-2 Dwyer -Alternative Fee Schedule No. 2 Schedule of Rates for Traffic Impact Fees (Effective 4/2/2014) Land Use Adjusted Trip Ends Average Distance Trip -end to Trip Additional Trip Miles Cost per Trip Mile Cost per 1000 sq. ft, dwelling unit or other unit o increase Scenario Cost per 1000 sq. ft, dwelling unit or other unit RESIDENTIAL LAND USES (per Unit) Detached Dwelling Unit 8.76 7.9 0.5 34.6 $ 64.34 S 2,226.16 /Unit $ 2,046.30 /Unit Apartment 6.15 7.9 0.5 24.3 $ 64.34 $ 1,563.46 /Unit S 1,437.05 /Unit Condominium/Townho use 5.36 7.9 0.5 21.2 $ 64.34 S 1,364.01 /Unit $ 1,253.49 /Unit Mobile Home Dwelling 4.57 7.9 0.5 18.11 $ 64.34 $ 1,164.55 /Unit $ 1,069.93 /Unit RESORTITOURIST (per Unit or Entry Dporj Hotel 6.291 7.61 0.5 23.9 $ 64.34 $ 1,537.73 /Room $ 11423.76 /Room All Suites Hotel 3.77 7.6 0.51 14.3 $ 64.34 $ 920.06 /Room $ 852.16 /Room Motel 4.34 7.61 0,51 16.5 $ 64.34 $ 1,061,61 /Room $ 982.83 /Room INDUS,TRIAL-?( per1,000 SF) -+ General Light Industrial 6.17 9.0 0.5 27.8 $ 64.34 $ 1,788.65 /1,000 sf $ 1,606.80 /1,000 sf Heavy Industrial 5.97 9.0 0.5 26.9 $ 64.34 S 1,730.75 /1,000 sf $ 1,554.77 /1,000 sf Manufacturing 2.73 9.0 0.5 12.3 $ 64.34 S 791.38 /1,000 sf $ 710.93 /1,000 sf Warehousing 4.39 9.0 0.5 19.8 $ 64.34 S 1.273.93 /1,000 sf 1,14422' /1,000 sf COMMERCIAL (per 1,000 SF) Office Park 7.42 8.8 0.5 32.6 $ 64.34 S 2,097.48 /1,000 sf $ 1,892.17 /1,000 sf Research Park 5.01 8.8 0.5 22.0 $ 64.34 S 1,415.48 /1,000 sf $ 1,277.04 /1,000 sf Business Park 9.34 8.8 0.5 41.1 $ 64.34 S 2,644.37 11,000 sf $ 2,384.90 /1,000 sf Bldg. Materials/Lumber Store 29.35 4.3 0.5 63.1 $ 64.34 S 4,059.85 /1,000 sf $ 4,059.85 /1,000 sf Garden Center 23.45 4.3 0.5 50.4 $ 64.34 $ 3,242.74 /1,000 sf $ 3,242.74 /1,000 sf Movie Theater 247 4.3 0.5 5.3 $ 64.34 $ 341.00 /1,000 sf $ 341.00 /1,000 sf Church 5.92 4.3 0.5 12.7 $ 64.34 $ 817.12 /1,000 sf $ 817.12 /1,000 sf Medical -Dental Office 22.21 8.8 0.5 97.7 S 64.34 $ 6,286.02 /1,000 sf $5,66.9.54 /1,000 sf General Office Building 7.16 8.8 0.5 31.5 $ 64.34 $ 2,026.71 /1,000 sf $ 1,827.91 /1,D00 sf Shopping Center 30.2 4.3 0.5 64.9 S 64.34 $ 4,175.67 /1,000 sf $ 4,175.67 /1,000 sf Hospital 11.42 4.3 0.5 24.6 $ 64.34 $ 1,582.76 /1,000 sf $ 1,582.76 /1.000 sf Discount Center 62.93 4.3 0.5 135.3 $ 64.34 $ 8,705.20 /1,000 sf $ 8,705.20 /1,000 sf High -Turnover Restaurant 8.9 4.3 0.5 19.1 $ 64.34 $ 1,228.89 /1,000 sf $ 1,228.89 /1,000 sf Convenience Market 43.57 4.3 0.5 93.7 $ 64.34 $ 6,028.66 /1,000 sf $ 6,028.66 /1,000 sf Office Park 13.97 4.3 0.5 30.0 $ 64.34 1 $ 1,930.20 1 /1,000 sf $ 1,930.20 /1,000 sf OTHER (asS ted) Cemetery 3.07 4.3 0.5 6.6 $ 64.34 $ 424.64 /Acre $ 424.64 /Acre Service Station/Market (av) 107.69 4.3 0.5 231.5 $ 64.34 $ 14,894.71 /Fuel Position $ 14,894.71 /Fuel Position Service Station w/Car Wash 99.35 4.3 0.5 213.6 $ 64.34 $ 13,743.02 /Fuel Position $ 13,743.02 /Fuel Position Resolution No. 2012-23 Exhibit A-2 Dwyer -Alternative Fee Schedule No. 2 Schedule of Rates for Traffic Impact Fees (Effective 9/2/2015) Land Use Adjusted Trip Ends Average Distance Trip -end to Trip Additional Trip Miles Cost per Trip Mile Cost per 1000 sq. ft, dwelling unit or other unit 100% Increase Scenario Cost per 1000 sq. ft, dwelling unit or other unit RESIDENTIAL LAND USES (per Unit) Detached Dwelling Unit 8.76 7.9 0.5 34.6 $ 64.34 $ 2,226.16 /Unit $ 2,226.16 /Unit Apartment 6.15 7.9 0.5 24.3 $ 64.34 $ 1,563.46 /Unit $ 1,563.46 /Unit Condominium/Townho use 5.36 7.9 0.5 21.2 $ 64.34 $ 1,364.01 /Unit $ 1,364.01 /Unit Mobile Home Dwelling 4.57 7.9 0.5 18.1 $ 64.34 $ 1,164.55 /Unit $ 1,164.55 /Unit RESORT/TOURIST (per Unit or Entry Door) Hotel 6.29 7.6 0.51 23.9 $ 64.34 $ 1,537.73 /Room $ 1,537.73 11 'Room All Suites Hotel 3.77 7.6 0.5 14.3 $ 64.34 S 920.06 /Room $ 920.06 /Room Motel 4.34 7.6 0.51 16.5 $ 64.34 S 1,061.61 /Room $ 1,061.61 /Room INDUSTRIAL ( per 1,000 SF)` General Light Industrial 6.17 9.0 0.5 27.8 $ 64.34 $ 1,788.65 /1,000 sf $ 1,788.65 /1,000 sf Heavy Industrial 5.97 9.0 0.5 26.9 $ 64.34 S 1,730.75 /1,000 sf S 1,730.75 /1,000 sf Manufacturing 2.73 9.0 0.5 12.3 $ 64.34 $ 791.38 /1,000 sf $ 791.38 /1:000 sf Warehousing 1 4.39 9.01 0,51 19.8 $ 64.34 S 1,273.93 11,000 sf $ 1,273.93 1 /1.000 sf COMMERCIAL (per 1,000 SF) Office Park 7.42 8.8 0.5 32.6 $ 64.34 $ 2,097.48 i /1,000 sf $ 2,097.48 /1,000 sf Research Park 5.01 8.8 0.5 22.0 $ 64.34 $ 1,415.48 /1,000 sf $ 1,415.48 11,000 sf Business Park 9.34 8.8 0.5 41.1 $ 64.34 $ 2,644.37 /1,000 sf $ 2,644.37 /1,000 sf Bldg. Materials/Lumber Store 29.35 4.3 0.5 63.1 $ 64.34 $ 4,059.85 /1,000 sf $ 4:059.85 /1,000 sf Garden Center 23.45 4.3 0.5 50.4 $ 64.34 $ 3,242.74 /1,000 sf $ 3,242.74 /1,000 sf Movie Theater 2.47 4.3 0.5 5.3 $ 64.34 $ 341.00 /1,000 sf $ 341.00 /1,000 sf Church 5.92 4.3 0.5 12.7 $ 64.34 $ 817.12 /1,000 sf $ 817.12 /1,000 sf Medical -Dental Office 22.21 8.8 0.5 97.7 $ 64.34 $ 6,286.02 /1,000 sf $ 6,286.02 /1,000 sf General Office Building 7.16 8.8 0.5 31.5 $ 64.34 $ 2,026.71 /1,000 sf $ 2,026.71 /1,000 sf Shopping Center 30.2 4.3 0.5 64.9 $ 64.34 $ 4,175.67 /1,000 sf S 4,175.67 /1,000 sf Hospital 11.42 4.3 0.5 24.6 $ 64.34 $ 1.582.76 /1.000 sf S 1,582.76 /1,000 sf Discount Center 62.93 4.3 0.5 135.3 $ 64.34 $ 8,705.20 /1,000 sf $ 8,705.20 /1,000 sf High -Turnover Restaurant 89 4.3 0.5 19.1 $ 64.34 $ 1,228.89 /1,000 sf $ 1,228.89 /1,000 sf Convenience Market 43.57 4.3 0.5 93.7 $ 64.34 $ 6,028.66 /1,000 sf $ 6,028.66 /1,000 sf Office Park 1 13971 4.31 0. 51 30.0 $ 64.34 1 S 1,930.20 /1,000 sf $ 11930.20 /1,000 sf OTHER (as noted) Cemetery 3.07 4.3 0.5 6.6 $ 64.34 $ 424.64 /Acre $ 424.64 /Acre Service Station/Market av 107.69 4.3 0.5 231.5 $ 64.34 $ 14,894.71 /Fuel Position $14,894.71 /Fuel Position Service Station w/Car Wash 99.35 4.3 0.5 213.6 $ 64.34 1 $ 13,743.02 /Fuel Position $13,74.3.02 'Fuel Position Exhibit A-3 Aternative Fees &d@LQW..S012-23 Schedule of Rates for Traffic Impact Fees (Effective 9/2/2012) Recommended Cost per 30% Increase 1000 sq. ft, dwelling unit Scenario Cost per Adjusted Average Trip -end Additional Cost per or other unit (90% of 1000 sq. ft, dwelling Land Use Trip Ends Distance to Trip Trip Miles Trip Mile original) unit or other unit RESIDENTIAL LAND.USES (per Unit) ;. .. Detached Dwelling Unit 8.76 7.9 0.5 34.6 $ 50.22 $ 1,737.61 /Unit $:; 1;722.55 /Unit Apartment 6.15 7.9 0.5 24.3 $ 50.22 $ 1,220.35 /Unit $ 1,20950, /Unit Condominium/Townhouse 5.36 7.9 0.5 21.2 $ 50.22 $ 1,064.66 /Unit $ 1,D54.55 /Unit Mobile Home Dwelling 4.57 7.9 0.5 18.1 $ 50.22 $ 908.98 /Unit $,-.--89959 /Unit RESORTITOURIST (per'Unit,or;'\EntryD oor) ;. . Hotel 6.29 7.6 0.5 23.9 $ 64.34 1 $ 1,537.73 /Room $' 1,218.63' /Room All Suites Hotel 3.771 7.6 0.5 14.3 $ 64.34 1 $ 920.06 /Room $. 729.93 /Room Motel 4.341 7.6 0.5 16.5 $ 64.34 $ 1,061.61 /Room $ 841.02 /Room INDUSTRIAL (;per 1,000 SF)= ' General Light Industrial 6.17 9.0 0.5 27.8 $ 64.34 $ 1,788.65 /1,000 sf /1 000 Heavy Industrial 5.97 9.0 0.5 26.9 $ 64.34 $ 1,730.75 /1,000 sf ,$ 1 238.p1 /1,000 Manufacturing 2.73 9.0 0.5 12.3 $ 64.34 $ 791.38 /1,000 sf $ 566 11, /1,000 Warehousing 4.39 9.0 0.5 19.8 $ 64.34 $ 1,273.93 11,000 sf $: `910.74 /1,000 COMMERCIAL (per1,000 SF) Office Park 7.42 8.8 0.5 32.6 $ 64.34 $ 2,097.48 /1,000 sf $ 1 522:G1 /1,000 sf Research Park 5.01 8.8 0.5 22.0 $ 64.34 $ 1,415.48 /1,000 sf $ 1,021.85 ' sf ,000 Business Park 9.34 8.8 0.5 41.1 $ 64.34 $ 2,644.37 /1,000 sf $ 1,017.85" S1,000 Bldg. Materials/Lumber 29.35 4.3 0.5 63.1 $ 64.34 $ 4,059.85 11,000 sf $ 4,D59.85 /1,000 Store sf Garden Center 23.45 4.3 0.5 50.4 $ 64.34 $ 3,242.74 /1,000 sf $ 3,242.74 f ,000 Movie Theater 2.47 4.3 0.5 5.3 $ 64.34 $ 341.00 /1,000 sf $ 341.00 /1,000 sf Church 5.92 4.3 0.5 12.7 $ 64.34 $ 817.12 /1,000 sf $ 817.12 sf ,000 Medical -Dental Office 22.21 8.8 0.5 97.7 $ 64.34 $ 6,286.02 /1,000 sf $ 4 559.$9 sf ,000 General Office Building 7.16 8.8 0.5 31.5 $ 64.34 $ 2,026.71 11,000 sf $ f 1 40,08 sf 000 , Shopping Center 30.2 4.3 0.5 64.9 $ 64.34 $ 4,175.67 /1,000 sf $ 4,175.67 /1,000 sf Hospital 11.42 4.3 0.5 24.6 $ 64.34 $ 1,582.76 /1,000 sf $ 1,582.76 sf ,000 Discount Center 62.93 4.3 0.5 135.3 $ 64.34 $ 8,705.20 /1,000 sf $ 8,705.20 f ,000 High-Tumover Restaurant 8.9 4.3 0.5 19.1 $ 64.34 $ 1,228.89 11,000 sf I $ 1,228.89 11,000 sf Convenience Market 43.57 4.3 0.5 93.7 $ 64.34 $ 6,028.66 /1,000 sf $ 6,028.66 f ,000 Office Park 13.97 4.3 0.5 30.0 $ 64.34 $ 1,930.20 /1,000 sf $ 1,930.20 sf ,000 OTHER (aswnoted) Cemetery 3.07 4.3 0.5 6.6 $ 64.34 $ 424.64 /Acre $ 424.64 /Acre Service Station/Market 107.69 4.3 0.5 231.5 $ 64.34 $ 14,894.71 /Fuel $ 14,894.71 /Fuel av Position Position Service Station w/Car 99.35 4.3 0.5 213.6 $ 64.34 $ 13,743.02 /Fuel $ 13,743.02 /Fuel Wash Position Position Exhibit A-3 Aternative Fee Scnecl'eoloo32012-23 Schedule of Rates for Traffic Impact Fees (Effective 9/2/2013) Land Use Adjusted Trip Ends Average Distance Trip -end to Trip Additional Trip Miles Cost per Trip Mile Recommended Cost per 1000 sq. ft, dwelling unit or other unit (90% of original) 60% Increase Scenario Cost per 1000 sq, ft, dwelling unit or other unit RESIDENTIAL LAND USES (per Unit) = r Detached Dwelling Unit 8.76 7.9 0.5 34.6 $ 57.39 $ 1,985.69 /Unit $,. 1,938.39 /Unit Apartment 6.15 7.9 0.5 24.3 $ 57.39 $ 1,394.58 /Unit $ ' 1,361.20 /Unit CondominiumlTownho use 5.36 7.9 0.5 21.2 $ 57.39 $ 1,216.67 /Unit $ ,1,18717 /Unit Mobile Home Dwelling 4.57 7.9 0.5 18.1 $ 57.39 $ 1,038.76 /Unit S "1,013.15 /Unit RESORT(TOURIST (pe*V hit .o 3En Door) Hotel 6.291 7.61 0.51 23.9 $ 64.34 1 $ 1,537.73 1 /Room $ - 1,355:39 /Room All Suites Hotel 3.77 7.61 0.5 14.31 $ 64.34 1 $ 920.06 1 /Room $._ 811 41. /Room Motel 4.341 7.61 0.51 16.5 $ 64.34 1 $ 1,061.61 1 /Room '$': ` 935.50 /Room INDUSTRIAL ( per 1,060: SF) General Light industrial 6.17 9.0 0.5 27.8 $ 64.34 $ 1,788.65 /1,000 sf $ 1,497.69 /1,000 sf Heavy Industrial 5.97 9.0 0.5 26.9 $ 64.34 $ 1,730.75 /1,000 sf $r :1„449.1B 11,000 sf Manufacturing 2.73 9.0 0.5 12.3 $ 64.34 $ 791.38 /1,000 sf $ 662.65 /1,000 sf Warehousing 4.39 9.0 0.5 19.8 $ 64.34 $ 1,273.93 1 /1,000 sf $ 1,066.39 /1,000 sf COMMERCIAL (per 1,000 SF) Office Park 7.42 8.8 0.5 32.6 $ 64.34 $ 2,097.48 /1,000 sf $ 1,768.99 /1,000 sf Research Park 5,01 8.8 0.5 22.0 $ 64.34 $ 1,415.48 11,000 sf $ .1193.98 /1,000 sf Business Park 9.34 8.8 0.5 41.1 $ 64.34 $ 2,644,37 /1,000 sf $' '`2,229.22. /1,000 sf Bldg. Materials/Lumber Store 29.35 4.3 0.5 63.1 $ 64.34 $ 4,059.85 11,000 sf $ 4,059.35 11,000 sf Garden Center 23.45 4.3 0.5 50.4 $ 64.34 $ 3,242.74 /1,000 sf $ 3,242.74 /1,000 sf Movie Theater 2A7 4.3 0.5 5.3 $ 64.34 $ 341.00 /1,000 sf $ 341.00 /1,000 sf Church 5.92 4.3 0.5 12.7 $ 64.34 $ 817.12 /1,000 sf $ 817.12 /1,000 sf Medical -Dental Office 22.21 8.8 0.5 97.7 $ 64.34 $ 6,286.02 /1,000 sf $ .5;299:66 /1,000 sf General Office Building 7.16 8.8 0.5 31.5 $ 64.34 $ 2,026.71 11,000 sf $ 1 708.63 /1,000 sf Shopping Center 30.2 4.3 0.5 64.9 $ 64.34 $ 4,175.67 /1,000 sf $ 4,175.67 /1,000 sf Hospital 11.42 4.3 0.5 24.6 $ 64.34 $ 1,582.76 11,000 sf $ 1,582.76 /1,000 sf Discount Center 62.93 4.3 0.5 135.3 $ 64.34 $ 8,705.20 /1,000 sf $ 8,705.20 /1,000 sf High -Turnover Restaurant 8.9 4.3 0.5 19.1 $ 64.34 $ 1,228,89 /1,000 sf $ 1,228.89 /1,000 sf Convenience Market 43.57 4.3 0.5 93.7 $ 64.34 $ 6,028.66 /1,000 sf $ 6,028.66 /1,000 sf Office Park 13.971 4.3 0.51 30.0 $ 64.34 $ 1,930.20 /1,000 sf $ 1,930.20 /1,000 sf ,t OTHER:(as noted) Cemetery 3.07 4.3 0.5 6.6 $ 64.34 $ 424.64 /Acre $ 424.64 /Acre Service Station/Market av 107.69 4.3 0.5 231.5 $ 64.34 $ 14,894.71 /Fuel Position $ 14,894.71 /Fuel Position Service Station w/Car Wash 99.35 4.3 0.5 213.6 $ 64.34 $ 13,743.02 /Fuel Position $ 13,743.02 /Fuel Position c05 Resolution No. 2012-23 Exhibit A-3 Aternative Fee Schedule No. 3 Schedule of Rates for Traffic Impact Fees (Effective 9/2/2014) Land Use Adjusted Trip Ends Average Distance Trip -end to Trip Additional Trip Miles Cost per Trip Mile Recommended Cost per 1000 sq. ft, dwelling unit or other unit (90% of original) RESIDENTIAL LAND USES (per Unit) Detached Dwelling Unit 8.76 7.9 0.5 34.6 $ 64.34 $ 2,226.16 /Unit Apartment 6.15 7.9 0.5 24.3 $ 64.34 $ 1,563.46 /Unit Condom inlum%Townhou se 5.36 7.9 0.5 21.2 $ 64.34 $ 1,364.01 /Unit Mobile Home Dwelling 4.57 7.9 0.5 18.1 $ 64.34 $ 1,164.55 /Unit RESORT/TOURIST (per Unit -or Entry Door) Hotel 6.29 7.6 0.5 All Suites Hotel 3.77 7.6 0.5 Motel 4.34 7.6 0.5 INDUSTRI�IL{ per 1,000 SF) General Light Industrial 6.17 Heavy Industrial 5.97 Manufacturing 273 Warehousing 4.39 COMMERCIAL (per 1,000 SF) Office Park 7.42 Research Park 5.01 Business Park 9.34 Bldg. Materiais/Lumber Store 29 35 Garden Center 23.45 Movie Theater 2.47 Church 5.92 Medical -Dental Office 22.21 General Office Building 7.16 Shopping Center 30.2 Hospital 11 A2 Discount Center 62.93 High -Turnover Restaurant 8.9 Convenience Market 43.57 Office Park 13.97 OTHER (as t:atec!) Cemetery 307 Service Station/Market 107.69 Service Station w/Car I 99.35 Wash 9.0 0.5 9.0 0.5 9.0 0.5 9.01 0.5 4.31 0.5 4.3 0.5 4.3 0.5 4.3 0.5 8.8 0.5 8.8 0.5 4.3 0.5 4.3 0.5 4.3 0.5 4.3 0.5 4.31 0.5 4.31 0.5 4.31 0.5 4.3 0.5 4.31 0.5 23.9 S 64.34 1 S 14.3 $ 64.34 $ 16.5 $ 64.34 S 27.8 $ 64.34 $ 26.9 $ 64.34 $ 12.3 $ 64.34 S 19.8 $ 64.34 S 32.6 $ 64.34 S 22.0 $ 64.34 $ 41.1 S 64.34 $ 63.11 $ 64.34 1 S 50.4 $ 64.34 $ 5.3 $ 64.34 $ 12.7 $ 64.34 $ 97.7 $ 64.34 $ 31.5 $ 64,34 $ 64.9 $ 64.34 $ 24.6 S 64.34 S 135.3 $ 64.34 $ 19.1 $ 64.34 $ 93.7 $ 64.34 $ 30.01 S 64.34 S 6.6 $ 64.34 $ 231.5 $ 64.34 $ 213.E $ 64.34 1 $ 1.537.73 /Room 920.06 /Room 1,061.61 /Room 1,788.65 /1,000 sf 1,730.75 /1,000 sf 791.38 /1,000 sf 1,273.93 /1,000 sf 2,097.48 /1,000 sf 1,415.43 /1,000 sf 2,644.37 /1,000 sf 4,059.85 1 /1,000 sf, 3,242.74 /1,000 sf 341.00 /1,000 sf 817.12 /1,000 sf 6,286,02 /1,000 sf 2,026.71 /1.000 sf 4,175.67 /1,000 sf 1,582.76 /1,000 sf 8,705.20 /1,000 sf 1,228.89 /1,000 sf 6,028.66 1 /1.000 sf 1.930.20 /1,000 sf 424.64 /Acre 14,894.71 /Fuel Position 13,743.02 /Fuel Position Guide to Master Facilities Plan Master Facilities Plan Cost Sur City of Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Table of Contents All Projects Law Enforcement Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment Cost Summary LE-001 Additional Law Enforcement Facility Space LE-002 Acquire Additional Response Vehicles LE-003 Acquire Additional Sworn Office Issued Equipment LE-004 Acciuire Law Enforcement Specialty Equipment Fire Suppression/Medic Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment Cost Summary 11 FS-001 Relocate Station #8 (Heil) 12 FS-002 Construct Station #8 (Heil) Apparatus Storage Facility 13 FS-003 Construct a Single Bay/Quarters at Station #4 (Magnolia) 14 FS-004 Acquire an Engine Company and Ambulance for Station #4 (Magnolia 15 FS-005 Acquire an Engine Company for Station #1 (Gothard) 16 FS--006 Acquire an Engine Company for Station #2 (Murdy) 17 Circulation (Streets, Bridges and Signals) System Cost Summary 19 ST-001 Beach Boulevard and Edinger Avenue 21 ST-002 Beach Boulevard and Heil Avenue 22 ST-003 Beach Boulevard and Warner Avenue 23 ST-004 Beach Boulevard and Slater Avenue 24 ST-005 Beach Boulevard and Talbert Avenue 25 ST-006 Beach Boulevard and Garfield Avenue 26 ST-007 Beach Boulevard and Yorktown Avenue 27 ST-008 Pacific Coast Highway and Warner Avenue 28 ST-009 Pacific Coast Highway and Goldenwest Street 29 ST-010 Pacific Coast Highway and Brookhurst Street 30 ST-011 Goldenwest Street and Bolsa Avenue 31 ST-012 Goldenwest Street and Slater Avenue 32 ST-013 Newland Street and Talbert Avenue 33 ST-014 Newland Street and Warner Avenue 34 ST-015 Newland Street and Yorktown Avenue 35 ST-016 Gothard Street and Slater Avenue 36 ST--017 Gothard Street and Talbert Avenue 37 ST-018 Ward Street and Garfield Avenue 38 HB -231- Item 9. - 96 City of Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan Table of Contents ST-019 Brookhurst Street and Adams Avenue ST-020 Miscellaneous Traffic Signals/intersection Improvements ST-021 Public Works Maintenance Building ST-022 Public Works Maintenance Vehicles Storm Drainage Collection System Cost Summary SD-001 Santa Ana River & Talbert Channel Region (SD Region #1) SD--W2 Coastal and Bolsa Chica Wetlands Region (SD Region #2) SD-W3 Slater Channel Region (SD Region #3) SD--W4 Wintersburg Channel Region (SD Region #4) SD-005 Balsa Chica Channel & Harbour Region (SD Region #5) SD-006 Public Works Maintenance Building 39 40 41 42 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 52 53 54 55 Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Cost Summary 57 PK--001 Bartlett Park Conceptual Plan and EIR 59 PK-002 Irby Park Phase II 60 PK-003 Central Park Former Gun Range EIR, RAP and Development 61 PK-004 Le Bard Park Expansion Master Plan and Development plan 62 PK-W5 Blufftop Park Trail Improvements 63 PK-006 Edinger Dock Development 64 PK-007 Wardlow Field Reconfiguration Design/Construction 65 PK-008 City -Wide Parks Master Plan 66 PK-009 Central Park Habitat Plan 67 PK-010 Central Park Acquisiton of Encyclopedia Lots 68 PK-011 Central Park Development of Remaining 86 Acres 69 PK-012 Central Park Rebuild Two Restaurant Facilities 70 PK-013 General Youth Sports Facilities Grants 71 PK-014 Murdy Youth Sports Complex Phase II 72 PK-015 Beach Playground 73 PK-016 Central Park Development of Former Gun Range 74 PK-017 Warner Dock Renovation and Expansion 75 Item 9. - 97 483 HB -232- evenue ost pecialists, LLc Serving Local. Governments Since I975 October 17, 2011 (amended April 27, 2012) Honorable Mayor and City Council Via Mr. Fred Wilson, City Manager City of Huntington Beach - City Hall 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: 2011-12 Master Facilities Plan and Development Impact Fee (DIF) Calculation Honorable Mayor, Council and City Manager Wilson: The City is experiencing private development of remaining vacant parcels and the on -going redevelopment of existing homes and businesses. This continuous development results in increased demand that must be absorbed (and accommodated) by the City's existing infrastructure and the Levels of Service (LOS) offered by that existing infrastructure. Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C., was contracted to undertake a comprehensive identification of the capital projects and capital acquisitions necessary to accommodate all such new demands for municipal service. Such a study is necessary to preserve the existing Levels of Service (LOS) currently offered to and enjoyed by (after having been paid for by) the existing community from the diminution of those existing LOS due to the addition of new residential and business development in Huntington Beach and calculate the development impact fees (DIFs) necessary to fund those required projects. Council and City staff, responsible for providing services to a continually expanding residential and business community, must recognize that the magnitude of the impact fees is a direct function of the nearly $403.4 million cost of the capital projects identified in the Master Facilities Plan as needed or required to accommodate new development. Regardless, anyone in the position of the Council members may find themselves reluctant to adopt the impact fees merely because they appear "too high". It is incumbent upon this Report and RCS Staff to convince the City Council of the justification and importance of the proposed impact fees The following Report calculates some new and a few updated impact fees for the City of Huntington Beach based on the aforementioned changes and the City's changing requirements for public safety, streets and signals, storm drainage and other quality of life facilities. The adoption of the updated DIFs will enable this City Council, as well as succeeding Councils, to continue to ensure that the City will be able to meet the basic infrastructure'needs of new growth, without unduly burdening the existing population and business community for these development -generated capital costs. �i a • i��u:'^r3vf��;%r� >.x:='�=: `„z �`'s v� ,. , .:'*�.v ��;�', •a�'".'' �, . _ . i .....'.. , ...... z.%=Giav P=iertaR;�A 9$3 72..9 Item 9. - 190 Page 2 10/17/11 (amended 04127112) Letter to the Huntington Beach City Council and Staff Adoption of the recommended impact fees contained herein and imposition upon the numerous development opportunities in the City of Huntington Beach, would generate approximately $172.1 million in a combination of public improvement dedications and DIF revenues limited for use on the many capital expansion projects deemed as development generated. Existing Impact Fee Fund balances ($3.5 million) and other revenues sources ($23.0 million) make up a significant amount of the difference between the capital total and the total revenue sources. This leaves a shortfall of $204.8 million (95 % of which is $194.4 million in unfunded storm drainage projects). The identification of $403.4 million in capital needs mostly generated by new development, is not to be taken lightly, but must be examined in perspective to the cost of existing infrastructure, facilities, vehicles and equipment that a new development will share in the use and enjoyment of upon City review, approval, construction and finally, occupancy. To offer such a perspective, a major element in this Report is a proportional analysis, or comparison of what is being asked of future residents, in the form of dedicated public improvements or an in -lieu (impact fee) payment, with the cost of the City's existing infrastructure (land, facilities, and equipment), contributed by the existing population and business community. The dedications, taxes and assessments contributed to date by the existing community over numerous decades of development have generated just over $2.1 billion (at current replacement costs) in infrastructure or capital improvements to the City of Huntington Beach. The following table identifies those existing asset commitments (or equity if you will), by infrastructure. Item 9. - 191 577 HB -326- Chapter One Background and Introduction AB 1600) takes only two pages of text to describe the findings that development impact fees must adequately make, but does not explain specifically how to do so. Most DIF calculations will identify the desired or needed capital projects, ostensibly required as a result of the new development. Therefore, what is fair and equitable? Is it fair to require future residents and businesses in a city to construct, via payment of impact fees, a new Police Station when the current station is merely rented or leased space? On the other hand, if a community already has all of the water utility system they will need at build -out, are they precluded from imposing an impact fee to recoup some of that expenses incurred in the construction of the maximum needed water utility improvements prior to need for the maximum demand? These are difficult questions that may be made clearer and easier by reviewing the following examples. Comparison of Needed Infrastructure with Existing Infrastructure. The answer to these difficult questions may best be answered by comparing various infrastructure scenarios. This can be accomplished by looking closely at our friends in the planned community of Happy Valley3 for a few scenarios to explain the three possible conditions that can occur regarding the agency's current infrastructure and the demand upon them. We will use the provision of fire protection, a service that most of us as nonprofessional fire fighters can somewhat understand. These three "conditions" include that the fire suppression system infrastructure construction has: 1. been On -target. 2. been Deficient. Or; 3. created Excess Service Capacity. Adoption of a Standard - According to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), a standard two -bay fire station (estimated for purposes of this example to cost about $3,000,000) can meet the needs of roughly 5,000 homes or 10,000,000 square feet of business pad. If these standards were adopted as Happy Valley's public safety element of the City's General Plan, they would be known as the demure or stated (or desired) standard (i.e., the standard the community would like to meet). This fee would be referred to as the General Plan Build -out Need -based Development Impact Fee. The inductive development impact fees (or cost per proportional unit served) for this de jure standard would then be: Table 1-1 Calculation of NFPA Impact Cost -LandJiJse Y Station, o t . i Tn�t Sery� act Fee_i_: Residential Dwellings $3,000,000 5,000 $600.00 per home Business Square Feet $3,000,000 10,000,000 $0.30 pE S.F. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 5 Item 9. - 199 585 H -334- Chapter One Background and Introduction Service Base - Happy Valley's General Plan indicates that at General Plan build -out there will be 10,000 residential units and about 20,000,000 square feet of commercial/office/industrial space creating a need for four stations at build -out. The station calculation is as follows: Table 1-2 Determination of Required Number of Stations - - �uxn"ber �rnts servee!-by ` St�trons' - -- _ , of Us_- Ore Stott �R�quue Residential Dwellings 10,000 5,000 2 Stations Business Square Feet 20,000,000 10,000,000 2 Stations Required Stations at General Plan Build -out 4 Stations The infrastructure is "On -target" - The need for four stations appears simple and the Happy Valley Council need only impose the impact fees identified in Table 1 - I . Currently, Happy Valley has 6,250 residential units and 7,500,000 square feet of commercial/industrial building pad and is half "built -out" (in terms of fire calls for service). In this example, existing development within Happy Valley is generating half of the ultimate (General Plan build -out) fire calls -for -service. This is demonstrated in Table 1-3 following: Table 1-3 Development of Current Infrastructure is "On -Target" Ht�be� l�rnts-_erved�Sy � Statton� Q=lllt5 taTQA Residential Dwellings 6,250 5,000 1.25 Stations Business Square Feet 7,500,000 10,000,000 0.75 Stations Total Number of Stations Required Currentl 2.00 Stations Conversely, Happy Valley has the remaining half of its fire demand (in terms of calls -for -service) Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 6 586 HB -335- Item 9. - 200 Chapter One Background and .Introduction yet to come. Left to build are 3,750 detached dwelling units and 12,500,000 square feet of business floor space, and when constructed would generate the following capital needs identified on Table 1-4 following: Table 1-4 Remaining Development and Station Requirement Lumber-i7ruts served - - _ _ _ _ - 9ne�tation_ _ Re tiue_eI; Residential Dwellings 3,750 5,000 0.75 Stations Business Square Feet 12,500,000 10,000,000 1.25 Stations 71, of New Stations Required from Land to be Developed 2.00 Stations If the earlier calculated impact fees ($600 per residence and $0.30 per square foot of business pad) were adopted and imposed, Happy Valley would collect (by General Plan build -out) enough capital revenues to construct the remaining two stations and proportionality between existing and future residents and businesses would be evident. Table 1-5 following demonstrates this: Table 1-a Remaining DIF Collection Number Impact _=Amount - - of Knits Fee Co]tecfed Residential Dwellings 3,750 $600.00 $2,250,000 Business Square Feet 12,500,000 $0.30 $3,750,000 Amount Collected in Development Impact Fees $6,000,000 CrStationsto st of a Single New Station $3,000,000 be Built with Development Impact Fees 2.00 And everyone in the community of Happy Valley is adequately served by the four stations having been financed generally fairly by the total community. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 7 Item 9. - 201 587 HB -336- Chapter One Background and Introduction The infrastructure is in Deficient Condition - Consider, however, the implications if the current Happy Valley residents and businesses had shown the earlier limited commitment to contribute only enough financing to construct one station when, based upon their own adopted standards and level of development, they should have two stations? Clearly three more stations would be needed on the path to General Plan "build -out." The possibility of requiring the remaining future home and business owners to finance all three remaining stations would be completely inequitable. But would it be fair and equitable to charge new residents the $600 per home and new businesses the $0.30 per business square foot in order to acquire the remaining two stations required to meet the NFPA standards required of the new development? The simple and direct answer is probably not. With only one station constructed at half build -out, the Happy Valley community has not demonstrated to a proportional commitment to meeting the NFPA standards, and as a result would not have a strong case to assert that others who build later need to contribute toward the construction of multiple (two) fire stations at a higher service rate by including the "missing" second station. The problem is in trying to identify a municipal revenue source imposed only on the existing development. Simply, there is none. Soon as a business pays its impact fees, constructs, that business becomes part of the existing community. The service provided by the single existing station is the community's de facto (or "in fact") standard service level. In short, it is difficult (but possible) to claim that a higher level of service is required of new development when the City is somehow getting by with a lower level of service. With one station, the contributed equity to build the single station would be half of the impact fee proposed in Table 1-1, or $300/residential unit and $0.15/square foot of business space respectively (See Table 1-6, following). Table 1-6 Development Impact Fee at Deficient Condition .- _ Ntzmi�er- -��tmg - Amount Residential Units 3,750 $300.00 $1,125,000 Business S.F. 12,500,000 $0.15 $1,875,000 Amount Contributed b_v Existing Community $3,000,000 Cost of One New Station $3,000,000 Station(s) built with Community's Contribution 1.00 Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 8 588 HB -337- Item 9. - 202 Chapter 2 Demographics and Findings This Chapter provides an inventory of developed and undeveloped (and under -developed) land within the City. The City, surprisingly, still possesses areas of vacant land zoned for residential and business uses. LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS This Report contains an inventory of developed land and land with remaining development opportunities within Huntington Beach boundaries. The undeveloped land inventory columns form the base for distribution of the estimated infrastructure costs required to extend the existing levels of service to the new development. The developed land inventory also forms the base for distributing the cost of the existing infrastructure for comparison and for the de facto identification of the existing levels of service (LOS) provided by those existing infrastructures. Table 2-1 below, summarizes the inventory of all private land uses contained within the current City limits. They are based upon General Plan data, Orange County projections, City records and a staff analysis of only privately held parcels.' Some of the vacant parcels have vested rights and would have the existing impact fees imposed. The acreage and unit data are detailed in Appendix A. Table 2-1 Detailed Land Use Inventory sty c�iHunirrgton Beach Drvelaped Net lrxcr>ra Total '''oral. Land: Use Database Acres # of Ur�S . 1lcres of Units..:::; Acres # ©# Units Detached Dwelling Units (1) Attached Dweiiinq Units 1 Mobile Home Dwelling Units (2) Hotel/Motel Lodging Units Resort Lodging Units CommerciaUOfce Uses Uses 6,436.0 38,616 295.00 1,749 1,805.4 36,108 111.20 5,307 204.6 2,865 1.00 9 33.4 1,070 18.60 818 20.2 809 9.30 535 841.9 12,836,000 39.80 2,417,000 930.3 1 20,261,000 187.00 3,638,000 6,731.00 40,365 1,916.60 41,415 205.60 2.874 52.00 1,888 29.50 1,344 881.70 15,253,000 1,117.30 23,899,000 Total- City Limits 1 10,271.8 . --- r77fijl ---- I 10,933.70 ---- Private Residences 77,589 407.2 7,065 1 8,853.2 84,654 Commercial Lodging Rooms6 fS,446.0 1,879 27.9 1,353 81.5 3,232 Business Square Feet 2 33,097,000 226.8 6,055,000 1,999.0 39,152,000 Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 16 596 HB -345- Item 9. - 210 Chapter 2 Demographics and Findings Land Use Definitions. This Report classifies properties as either one of three residential land uses or two different categories of commercial/industrial development. These land uses are defined below2: Residential Land Uses: • Detached Dwelling Residential - This category of land use is generally found in the City's General Plan designations of RL (Residential Low Density) and RM (Residential Medium Density). • Attached Dwelling Residential - This category of land use is generally found in the City's General Plan designations of RM (Residential Medium Density), RMH (Residential Medium High Density) and RH (Residential High Density). • Mobile Home Residential - This category of land use is generally found in any of the City's residential General Plan designations as noted above. With the more frequent replacement of a manufactured dwelling unit on an existing mobile home pad, it is important to note that such a replacement is not a development impact fee event. It is merely a replacement of an existing structure thus the demand already exists. No additional mobile home (or modular) units in private park like settings is are anticipated. However, one acre has been included in the calculations in order to calculate a development impact fee for that use should such an application be filed. Business/Commerce Land Uses: • Hotel/Motel Lodging - This category identifies the hotel and motel commercial lodging units and is generally found in the City's General Plan designations of CV (Commercial Visitor) and CG (Commercial General). It is limited to commercial lodging that is two stories or less and does not have an inordinate amount of meeting space. • Resort Lodging - This is a recognition that in terms of commercial lodging, a resort facility, with more intensive banquets or convention space, most likely will incur differing municipal service demands than that of a typical hotel/motel facility. It is also generally found in the City's General Plan designation of CV (Commercial Visitor). Resort lodging has been defined as three stories or higher with significant amounts of square feet with which to accommodate large events such as conventions, business sessions and weddings, thus having a large drive-in population that does not necessarily stay at the facility overnight. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 17 Item 9. - 211 597 HB -346- Chapter 2 Demographics and Findings • Commercial Uses - As utilized in this Report, Commercial uses include the general category of retail services and thus includes outlets ranging from restaurants to auto repair shops to shopping centers. This category is generally found in the City's General Plan designations of CN (Commercial Neighborhood), CO (Commercial Office), CG (Commercial General)), CR (Commercial Regional), and CV (Commercial Visitor). It would encompass all office uses. • Industrial Uses - This category contains all businesses generally found in the City's General Plan designation of I (Industrial). Definitions of Land Use Status. Each of the major land use categories detailed above is categorized as either Developed or Net Increase. Definitions are as follows: Developed Acreage - Includes land in the City which is fully developed and, or land which has received a building permit but which is not yet constructed. Acreage in this category may also include non -conforming use areas of the City which contain extensive development prior to annexation or before changes to the General Plan were made. City staff has also included projections regarding properties which are currently classified as "Developed" but which may undergo redevelopment in the future. In fact, most of the development increases within the Beach/Edinger Specific Plan Corridor and Downtown Specific Plan areas consist of redevelopment of existing uses. Net Increase Acreage - (Intensified/Redeveloped/or acreage available for development or redevelopment) - Refers to all non-public vacant acreage located within the City. This category also includes any parcels that may currently be partially developed but may have capacity for redevelopment. Table 2-2, following, provides a summary of the detailed land use inventory, limited to privately held property more detailed on Table 2-1. Staffs land use inventory reveals that there are approximately 10,271.80 acres of privately -held developed land within the City's planning boundaries. There remain approximately 661.90 acres of vacant or land available to be redeveloped (and thus increased in terms of demand) in the City. Available (undeveloped land or available for redevelopment) land represents approximately 6.0 % of the total 10,933.7 privately held acres within the City of Huntington Beach. Undeveloped parcels to be developed as detached dwellings constitute the greatest amount (at 2.7%) of available acreage of all the land uses. [This space left vacant to place the following table on a single page]. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 18 598 HB -347- Item 9. - 212 Chapter 2 Demographics and Findincs Table 2-2 Summary of Undeveloped and Developed Acreage 7tveloped 1?ercent= = Vacnt, of Acres. P-Arcent`ota� Detached Dwelling Units 6,436.0 58.9% (1) 295.0 2.7% 6,731.0 Attached Dwelling Units 1,805.4 16.5 % 111.2 1.0 % 1,916.6 Mobile Home Dwellings 204.6 1.9% 1.0 0.0% 205.6 Comm. Lodging Units 33.4 0.3% 18.6 0.2% 52.0 Resort Lodging Units 20.2 0.2 % 9.3 0.1 % 29.5 Commercial/Office Uses 841.9 7.7 % 39.8 0.3 % 881.7 Industrial/Manu. Uses 930.3 8. 5 % 187.0 1 1.7 % 1 1,117.3 Total 10,271.8 94.0%] 661.9 1 6.0 % 1 10, 933.7 11 (1) Only 34 of the 295 acres are vacant lots. The remaining 261 acres represents the subdivided acres necessary for the addition of 1,566 detached units (on their own lots) in areas already developed such as a lot split of a larger parcel with an existing detached dwelling unit. See Appendix A for greater detail. General Plan Build -out is defined as that point in time when most if not all of the City's privately owned land is developed at maximum levels allowed by the City's General Plan. Commercial/Industrial Development. In order to assess the costs of impact for commercial or industrial building intensification or building expansions, this Report includes a calculation of impact fees both on a per square foot basis for commercial and industrial development. In order to accomplish this, City Planning staff provided the typical maximum square feet of building allowable by the City's General Plan on a net acre of land. This percentage is sometimes referred to as the maximum Floor Area Ratio (or FAR), as shown following: ComrrmerciallOffice Development-15,246 G.S.F. per Acre (about 35% F.A.R.) Industrial Development - 21,390 G.S.F. per Acre (about 50% F.A.R.) Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 19 Item 9. - 213 599 1I13 -348- Chapter 2 Demographics and Findings POPULATION PROJECTIONS A second component in determining the magnitude of impact of future development and the necessary facilities needed to mitigate that impact is a realistic assessment of the build -out population of the City. Many of the facilities contained in this Report are sized according to the estimated population at theoretical "build -out" or upon service levels which are based in part upon an estimation of the population to be served. Library facilities, parks and recreation facilities and community center facilities and equipment are examples of cost areas which rely heavily on population projections to determine space and facility needs. Park standards are usually stated in terms of the number of acres of park land per 1,000 persons, for instance. There are at least two generally accepted methods for projecting future population levels in a City: (1) past growth trends projected forward and (2) population holding capacity based on the General Plan land -use element. Each of these methods can be useful even though both possess certain limitations. There are several serious flaws in projecting the build -out population of a community using the past growth trend methodology. While this method is relatively simple and therefore easy for the general public to understand, it does not give consideration to when an area is actually built out. Eventually there comes a point in time where the amount of available land to build on is negligible. This technique does not help explain when that point is reached. Also, the past growth trend approach is not sensitive to policy changes made by Council or land use issues contained in the City's General Plan. For these reasons, this technique is more useful in projecting short-term population levels and should not be used to forecast the built -out population of an area. This Report relies on the methodology of holding -capacity, (described in the following section), to project future service levels and facility requirements. Holding CWacity Analysis. The methodology used in this Report to forecast the built -out population of City of Huntington Beach is the current holding capacity approach. This method calculates the sum of existing development and potential development allowable under current land use regulations, using average densities found in the City. The first step in projecting the City's population using the holding capacity approach is to inventory the remaining undeveloped acres within the City limits, which was previously accomplished in Tables 2-1 and 2-2 of this Chapter. The next step is to estimate the potential Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 20 600 HB -349- Item 9. - 214 Chapter 2 Demograpfaics and Findings dwelling units allowed per acre and then multiply the potential number of units by the average number of residents per unit. Table 2-3, on the following page, projects the additional number of dwelling units and potential population for the City of City of Huntington Beach through build -out. The number of potential new dwelling units was calculated by multiplying the amount of vacant acreage for each land use zone by the average densities (i.e., number of units allowed per acre) indicated in the City's General Plan. The number of persons per unit for new residential units is based on the 2000 U.S. Census and ranges from 2.913 and 1.822 persons for detached dwelling units and mobile home dwelling units respectively to 2.257 persons for attached dwelling units. Based on these assumptions, future residential development is expected to generate approximately 17,089 additional residents3 to City of Huntington Beach, joining the approximately 190,377 citizens already living in City. This results in a total estimated population at General Plan build -out of roughly 207,221 residents.4 The estimated General Plan build -out population of approximately 207,221 residents using this holding capacity approach is typically lower than the population forecasts based on the mathematical models described previously. This implies either that the City's period of residential build -out will actually be shorter than the 10 years indicated above or that the City's growth rate will decline from historical levels. This latter scenario is probably more likely to occur. As the residentially zoned land within the City's limits remaining to be developed continues to be developed during the next ten to twenty years, the City is likely to see fewer new dwelling units developed each year. [This space left vacant to place the following table on a single page]. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 21 Item 9. - 215 601, HB -350- Chapter 2 DemogM.phics and Findings Table 2,3 City of City of Huntington Beach Average Dwelling Occupancy, by Type (2000 United States Census Data) .. ....... Number Less f+lumt�er Fxistmg . ........ . R MCVOT* JAverage ' Nr#q*o 0 WOW:' UPPPY: 7- 7. Detached Total 1 37,007 630 36,377 J 105,981 2.913 98.30-40, 5,281 1,822 95.87% IMobile Home Total 3,024 125 2,899 1Other 31 91 j 154 1.6921 ---------- lAitkhed Aesiden*VW7 Duplex to Quadplex 9,681 265 9,416 26,190 2.781 i 97.26% Five or more 16,488 605 15,883 31,356 1 1.974 96.330 Attached 9,471 329 9,142 20,186 i 2.208 96.53% Total - MFR 35,640 1,199 34,441 77,732 2.257 96.64% 05<:<.:.I 190,377 Existing - State Department of Finance 01101/11 Population I Potential G_P_ Build-oul Pcipula n:::Aht1CjPjt6d tes obbaPO . MY, Undeveloped Detached Dwellings 1,749 98.30% 1,719 2.913 Undeveloped Attached Dwellings 5,307 96.64% 5,129 2.257 Undeveloped Mobile Home's 9 95.870/a 9 1.822 Population to be added development [Potential "Build -out" Population, at Historic Vacancy Rates. Potential s'AtJbO4 Undeveloped Detached Dwellings 1,749 100.000/0 1,749 Undeveloped Attached dwellings 5,307 100-000/0 5,307 Undeveloped Mobile Home's 9 100.00016 9 FPopulation to be added development 1 Potential Maximum 'Build -out' Population. (1) Summary File 3 (SF3), available at http.-Illactfinder.census.gov (2) Current population based upon State of California Department of Finance data. 2.913 2.257 1.822 Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report Ant 5,007 11,576 16 F-6,599 16,599-] 1 206,9761 Anticipated 5,095 978 161 17,089 17,089 1 F 2-07,466 207,466 207,466 MEfO6,176 0 0 , 1 27221 22 602 HB -35 1 - Item 9. - 216 Chapter 2 Demographics and Findings SUMMARY OF FINDINGS City staff identified just under $403.4 million in needed and desired capital improvement projects required through the City's General Plan build -out, including both projects related to existing deficiencies and those needed solely to support future growth. The adoption of the recommended maximum impact fees supported by the calculations in this Report (Schedule 2.1) would finance about 42.6 % of the needed capital facilities by raising some $172.1 million. Existing fund balances of $3.6 will finance roughly 0.9 of of the capital needs. Other sources, primarily existing agreements or intergovernmental support will finance about $23.0 million or 5.7%. Other capital revenue sources will need to be pursued for the remaining unfunded $204.8 million through build - out (50.8%). Roughly 95 %(or $194.4 million) of the $204.8 million represents unfunded storm drainage projects that may never come to fruition. Based on these costs and the schedules found at the end of each of the remaining chapters of this Report, costs attributable to future development were derived on a per unit basis for residential land uses and on a per square foot of pad basis for commercial and industrial land uses. Schedule 2.1, found at the end of this Chapter, provides a summary detail of the maximum DIFs for each type of infrastructure and land use category. The fees are summarized in Table 2-4, following: Table 2-4 Summary of Recommended Development Impact Fees (Based Upon the Lower of General Plan Build -out Needs or Equity -based Impact Fees) -_ Re commende�evelogment Land.LseVim` actees Detached Dwelling Units $25,890/Dwelling Unit Attached Dwelling Units $17,994/Dwelling Unit Mobile Home Dwellin Units $17,235/Dwellin Unit Hotel/Motel Lodging Units $2,854/Lodging Unit Resort Lodging Units $3,956/Lod ing Unit Commercial/Office Uses $5.002/S uare Foot Industrial/Manufacturing Uses $4.010/S uare Foot Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 23 Item 9. - 217 603 HB _3-2- Chapter 2 Demographics and Findings Specific impact fee rates for each land use can be found at the end of each chapter relating to each infrastructure. Schedule 2.1 at the end of this Chapter also identifies the probable impact fee revenue, the capital cost total and the difference, by individual infrastructure type (e.g., fire). Given the magnitude of the City's project list, vis-a-vis the proposed list of projects, and the lack of previous findings regarding any excess capacity, there is no potential for recoupment of the costs of previous development -generated capital projects (excess capacity) as was described in Chapter One. Additionally, the detail of the existing value of the various systems, does not approach the level of accuracy required to adopt a recoupment style impact fee. The recommended Development Impact Fees are those indicated following in Schedule 2.1. STRUCTURE OF THIS REPORT The following chapters of this Report contain the detailed information relative to the calculation of DIFs recommended by RCS for the entire City. Appropriate textual explanations are contained in each chapter, with a chapter devoted to each of the nine sets of DIF cost schedules, listed below and three appendices. CHAPTER 3 - Law Enforcement Facilities, Vehicles, and Equipment CHAPTER 4 - Fire Suppression/Medic Facilities, Vehicles, and Equipment CHAPTER 5 - Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System CHAPTER 6 - Storm Drainage Collection System CHAPTER 7 - Public Library Facilities and Collection CHAPTER 8 - Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development APPENDIX A - Expanded Land -use Database APPENDIX B - Summary of Recommendations APPENDIX C - Master Facilities Plan NOTE REGARDING TEXTUAL MATHEMATICS. It is important to note that the use of a computer provides for calculations to a large number of decimal points. Such data, when included in text and supporting textual tables, has been rounded to no more than two decimals for clarity and thus may be not replicated to the necessary degree of accuracy as the spreadsheet schedules at the end of each chapter. Should there be any difference between tables within a chapter and the schedules at the end of the same chapter, the schedules will prevail. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 24 604 HB -353- Item 9. - 218 Chapter 2 Demographics and Findings CHAPTER ENDNOTES 1. The figures are consistent with the City of Huntington Beach General Plan Land Use Element. 2. bid. 3. Assuming that the vacancy factor retains its traditionally high occupancy factor as evidenced in 2000 Census (averaging just under 97%). The estimated 16,844 additional residents is the average of full occupancy (17,089) and the roughly 97% average occupancy (16,599). 4. Ibid. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development ,Impact Fee Calculation Report 25 Item 9. - 219 605 HB -354- I 0 AN I--4 CD El tV tv O Schedule 2.1 City of Huntington Beach Summary of Development Impact Fees By Type of Fee (Fees per Residential Dwelling Unit, or Business Square Foot) at Fair Share or Equity -based Development Impact Fees -- Law Pire Circulati(Hi System storm [jrainage Public Palk Land/Open Enforcement Suppression Local Streets, Collecdon Library. Space Acquisition' Facilities, of al- i Facilitie0, et, M. Signals $ Bridged system Facilities & Improvements Scheduto 32Si hedule 4:2 Schedule 5,2 Y Schetjulo 6.2u Schedule 7.1 u Schedule 8.1 & 8.4 Calculated CostslDIF5 Detached Dwelling Units(1) $396 $922 $2,482 $3,061 $1,172 $17,857 Attached Dwelling Units $815 $382 S1,657 $397 i $908 $13,835 Mobile Home Dwelling Unitn(2 $369 $1.583 $1,299 $2.082 $733 $11,169 Hotel/Motel Lodging Unite $465 $356 $1.105 $479 No Fee $459 Resort Lodging Units $532 $794 $1.915 $356 No Fee $359 Commercial/Office Uses $1.041 $0.329 $2.331 $0-347 No Fee $0.954 Ind ustrial/Manutacturing Uses $0.443 $0.030 $1.621 $1.144 No Fee $0 772 Anticipated DIF Coliechon $4,341.018 $2,049,828 $31,231,893 $4.818.756 $73,422,345 Detachod Dwelling Units(1) $692,604 $1,612,578 $6,353.689 $2,106,879 Attached Dwelling Units S4,325,205 $2,027,274 $8,793.699 Mobile Horne Dwelling Units (2 $3,321 $14,247 $11,691 $18,738 $6,597 $100,521 Hotel/Motel Lodging Units L $372,190 $291,208 $903,890 $391,822 $0 $375,462 Resort Lodging Units $294.620 $424,790 $1,024,526 $190,460 s0 $192,065 commercial/office Uses $2,516,097 $795,193 $5,634,027 $838,699 $0 $2,305,818 Industrial/Manufacturing Uses $1,611,634 $109,140 $5,897.198 $4,161,872 $0 $2,808.536 Total $9806;671 $5,27+I,430 $P6,606,048 $1815$2i15i3 $6,876,181 $110;t36,640 City-wldeImpact Fee $9,805.671 $5,274,430 $26,606,048 $13,062,159 $6,875,181 $110,436,640 Existing Fund Balance $0 $0 $200,000 $o $0 $3,379,000 Other Sources $0 $700,000 $260,020 $0 $0 $22,000,000 capital Total $10,100.895 $11,941,972 $28,537.800 $207,494,050 $7,841,369 $137.483,000 Overap SAtlli#tt(I). ($295,224) W ($5,967,542) ($1,471,732) ($104,431,891) ($9e6,188) ($1,867,360) N Ch Development Impact Fee Total Per Unit nr Square ,Foot: $25,890 per Unit $17,994 per Unit $17,235 per Unit $2,854 per Unit $3,956 per Unit $5-0per S.F. I�L $4.010 10 per S.F. $45.281,610 $95,494.168 $155.115 $2,334,572 $2,116,460 $12,089,834 $14.588,380 $172,080,129 $172,060,129 $3,579.000 $22,960,020 $403,390,086 Chapter 3 Law Enforcement Facilities, Vehicles, and Equipment The Existing System (or the infrastructure). The Police Department currently operates out of the 78,700 square foot facilities at the Civic Center on Main Street and the 7,050 square foot Yh Street Substation. These combined 85,780 square feet of the two facilities provide roughly 365 square feet per each of the 235 sworn (budget approved) officers. The facility meet's current needs but will not likely accommodate the space needs required for the additional officers necessary to accommodate the additional calls -for -service generated by new development at General Plan build - out, Certainly not at the same standards of service afforded to existing development. The Department will need to hire additional officers to maintain the existing levels of law enforcement services and the current static facility will ultimately prove insufficient to house the entire staff at General Plan build -out. An expansion of the City -owned facility will need to occur before General PIan build -out to allow the City to accommodate that new development. Due to size limitations of the current police station parcels, it may be difficult to enlarge the current buildings at either of the existing sites. The existing facility space would cost approximately $53,423,178 to acquire at current land acquisition and construction costs. Additionally, the Department has a response fleet consisting of 231 vehicles installed with significant, and costly, amounts of sophisticated equipment costing some $12,640,310 to replace. The 235 General Fund -supported sworn officers are each assigned equipment such as various leathers, armaments, clothing, radios, protective vests, safety apparel costing an average of $9,930 per sworn officer for a total of $2,155,801 for the 235 current officers. The final key asset is the estimated $3,027,410 in law enforcement specialty equipment. These assets, totaling some $71,246,699, represent the cumulative commitment of the cumulative City Councils (and community) to the Police Department standards of service as supported by Law Enforcement Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment infrastructure. Demand Upon Infrastructure Created by the Development of Under or Undeveloped Parcels. Residents/ businesses benefit from law enforcement services in three ways: directly, indirectly and through standby availability. Direct services are those involving an actual unit response, usually as a result of being the victim of a crime or other emergency situation. Direct service results in the form of a law enforcement officer directly contacting the victim. Indirect benefits, such as crime prevention programs, free patrol time and other more general services that serve all, are benefits that are more difficult to calculate. As an example, the burglar that is arrested today in some neighbors home, may have broken into your home tomorrow. Most residents and businesses may go for many years before ever requiring a direct call -for -service. These fortunate residents Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 27 Item 9. - 221 607 HB -356- Chapter 3 Law En orcement Facilities Vehicles and E ui ment and businesses still benefit for law enforcement services, if in no other way, than in the security that a law enforcement officer is available, through adequate planned stand by, to respond if you require public safety assistance. Everyone benefits from stand-by capabilities, which is just the fact that law enforcement services are simply there, staffed, trained, equipped and available to respond as they are needed. Sworn law enforcement officials are the first responders to emergency problems that can occur to anyone. They are trained to act and solve just about any law enforcement problem that might occur. The concept of stand-by service is similar to stand-by water service. Consider owning a vacant lot not requiring water service, regardless of the fact that others have built a functional water system near your vacant lot. At some point in time, that vacant lot is developed and needs a water meter and water service. Because of the forethought of others, the water service is available when the lot is developed. One may not feel they need law enforcement services, but some day they will, and because of the foresight of others, the service capability will be available. The addition of new residential units and new businesses will increase the demand upon the law enforcement capacity to serve by creating more direct calls -for -service, more areas requiring preventive patrol, and in general, more opportunities for crimes to be committed. The development of vacant parcels into residential or business units will also generate more calls. Residents and business -owners occupying those residences and businesses will create the increase in law enforcement calls -for -service. Simply stated, more homes and businesses will mean more responses to the additional burglaries, domestic disputes, noise complaints, shoplifting, and miscellaneous incidents that will occur in the new homes and businesses. If the Law Enforcement capabilities (the base) are not expanded, then any increasing number of calls -for -service from development (the rate) will reduce the amount or free hours available for preventive patrol. This inability to expand the capabilities would ultimately drive the Department fully into a reactionary mode. Table 3-1, following, summarizes an analysis of the calls -for -service received by the Police Department in recent twelve month period.' The table indicates the breakdown of calls into the land uses that generated them and divides them by the number of developed units (during the same period). This process generates a calls -for -service factor for.the various land -uses. (This space left vacant to place the following table on a single page). Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 28 608 xB -357- Item 9. - 222 Chapter 3 Law Enforcement Facilities Vehicles and Ea4ment Table 3-1 Law Enforcement Calls -for -Service Generated by Land Use (2009) endLMwelltis �eoped Ca1�tal Ca11 Detached Dwelling Units 38,616 13,185 0.341/Unit Attached Dwelling Units 36,108 25,350 0.702/Unit Mobile Home Dwelling Units 2,865 910 0.318/Unit Hotel/Motel Units 1,070 420 0.393/Unit Resort Lodging Units 809 371 0.459/Unit Commercial Uses (in KSF) 12,836,000 11,514 1 0.897/KSF Industrial Uses (in KSF) 20,261,000 7,729 0.381/KSF Beach Area 1,806 The table above representing the 59,479 annual police calls -for -service to privately -held developed parcels within the City's limits (for a recent twelve months reporting periods), identifies the differing demand caused by the differing land uses. As an example, there were approximately 13,185 calls -for -service requiring a response to one of the 38,616 existing detached dwellings in the City (during the twelve month sample). The result indicates that each residential detached dwelling unit will statistically generate just slightly more than one third of a call -for -service per year,' on average. The same analysis was undertaken for the other seven land uses. Obviously there are calls to incidents on publicly owned roads and right-of-way, in parks and other publicly held parcels, these calls represent approximately 3 % of the annual calls -for -service. Calls -for - service to resort lodging facilities, typically larger than hotel/motel facilities (defined as three stories or more) have been separated in order to generate a more relevant calls -for -service rate for each of the two differing types of temporary lodging. Resort facilities have been shown to generate more calls -for -service, most likely due to their convention and banquet facilities. However, any such resorts constructed in the future would also have such amenities. The annual calls -for -service was responded to by one of the City's existing 235 sworn officers establishing an average of about 260.79 calls -for -service per sworn officer annually.3 Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 29 Item 9. - 223 609 HB -358- Chapter 3 Law Enforcement Facilities, Vehicles and Eguipmenr Average Demand as Determined by Calls -for -Service. The calls -for -service ratios are on -average, that is to say that not every detached dwelling unit will generate 0.341 annual calls -for -service. Since they are statistically representative of averages of how calls -for -service are generated. in City of Huntington Beach, they can be used to project the number of additional law enforcement calls - for -service that can be expected at General Plan build -out. This process is accomplished by multiplying the average calls -for -service rate, per Table 3-1, by the number of anticipated additional residential dwellings or business square feet per Table 2-1. The result is approximately 8,697 additional annual calls -far -service at General Plan build -out. The number of additional officers necessary to meet the anticipated (net) additional 8,697 annual calls -for -service from future development (8,448 from development and 249 from public rights -of -way) is then divided by the average number of calls -for -service capacity that an officer currently responds to (or 260.79 per year per officer). This process indicates that an additional thirty-three sworn police officers will be necessary to accommodate the anticipated new development at the current standards of service provided to the existing community. Or in the contrary, without the doubling of the Police staff, the City would experience a roughly 14.2% reduction in the standards -of -service at General Plan build -out, as defined by the ability to respond to calls -for -service. Information from Table 3-1 and Table 2-1 (Land -use Database) has been used to determine how many additional officers will be required at build -out. By multiplying the demand rate for detached dwelling units (0.341 calls -for -service per unit) times the 1,749 anticipated detached dwelling units to be constructed through General Plan build -out, the City could expect an additional 597.2 annual calls -for -service. The total 8,697 additional calls -for -service, (8,448 from developmcnt and 249 from the public beach area from all land -uses (and rights -of -way) divided by roughly 260.79 calls per officer per year indicates the need for thirty-three additional officers to be able to accommodate the additional calls generated by the new development at General Plan build -out without diminishing the existing standards of coverage to the existing community to do so. Table 3-2 identifies the calls -for -service anticipated for each of the seven major land uses. [This space left vacant to place the following table on a single page]. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 30 610 HB -359- Item 9. - 224 Chapter 3 Law Enforcement Facilities. Vehicles and Equipment Table 3-2 Additional Law Enforcement Calls (rounded) Generated by New Development, by Land Use — ems- is P�� ellMg oz�rre - _ =for �envice Mn Detached Dwelling Units 1,749 0.341/Unit 597.18 Calls Attached Dwelling Units 5,307 0.702/Unit 3,725.83Calls Mobile Home Units (1) 9 0.318/Unit 2.86 Calls Hotel/Motel Units 818 0.393/Unit 321.08 Calls Resort Lodging Units 535 0.459/Unit 245.35 Calls Commercial Uses (net in KSF) 2,417,000 0.897/KSF 1,268.07 Calls Industrial Uses (KSF) 3,638,000 0.381/KSF 1,387.80 Calls Proportional Beach Increase 248.96 Calls NOTES: (1) Development of these types of units is nut anticipated. One acre of units is included for calculation purposes.. Cumulatively, an additional (rounded) caIls-for-service would be expected at General Plan build - out. It is important to note that the additional of the thirty-three officers (8,695 annual calls -for - service - 260.79 calls/sworn officer) by General Plan build -out would merely maintain the existing levels of service, and would not increase the existing levels of service because of the additional 8,697 annual calls -for -service, or the 8,4.48 calls -for -service to the privately -held land - uses. No judgement is made, regarded or offered about the existing standards -of -service (LOS) or the current ratio of officers to calls -for -service, or that it is the City's desired level -of -service or that it is optimum, it merely is the existing, or defacto, level -of -service (LOS). The Purpose of the Fee. The purpose of the fee is to collect proportional contributions from new development to pay for additionally required law enforcement facilities, vehicles and equipment. Specifically, additional law enforcement calls -for -service can be expected, and the cost of adding sworn officers necessary to respond to these anticipated calls, and thus maintain the existing Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 31 Item 9. - 225 611 HB -360- Chapter 3 Law Enforcement Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment Table 3-3 General Plan Build -out Needs -rased Law Enforcement Impact Fees Detached Dwelling Units $692,944 $396/Unit Attached Dwelling Units $4,323,304 $815/Unit Mobile Home Dwelling Units $3,319 $369/Unit Hotel/Motel Lodging Units $372,568 $455/Unit Resort Lodging Units $284,694 $532/Unit Commercial/Office Uses $2,515,742 $1.041/S.F. Industrial/Manufacturing Uses $1,610,348 $0.443/S.F. DIF Proportionality Test by Comparison with Existing Financial Commitment. The current equity in the City's law enforcement assets includes the 85,750 square feet of law enforcement facilities with a replacement cost of $53,423,178, the 231 law enforcement vehicles costing the City some $12,640,310, the inventory of assigned equipment for 235 officers at a total of $2,155,801, the specialty and communications equipment at $3,027,410. There is no existing Law Enforcement Development Impact Fee thus no existing fund balance. When this combined equity figure of $71,246,699 is distributed to the current community (via Table 3-4, following and detailed in Schedule 3.3), the existing community commitment, on a per unit basis, is just slightly less than the calculated Law Enforcement General Plan Build -out Needs -based Development Impact Fees (or cost) per unit, as indicated by the existing $71,246,699 invested in capital for the provision of law enforcement. [This space left vacant to place the following table on a single page]. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 34 614 Hs -363- Item 9. - 228 Chapter 3 Law Enforcement Facilities. Vehicles and Equipment Table 3-4 Existing Financial Commitment or "Equity -based" Law Enforcement Impact Fees ._........ --.. - ;i��iCat1�H _�Otal' ill -- —}� Detached Dwelling Units $15,793,603 $409/Unit Attached Dwelling Units $30,365,403 $841/Unit Mobile Home Units $1,090,040 $380/Unit Hotel/Motel Units $503,096 $470Unit Resort Lodging Units $444,401 $549/Unit Commercial/Office Uses $13,792,002 $1.074/S.F. Industrial Uses $9,258,164 $0.475/S.F. RESULTING DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES The General Plan Build -out Needs -based impact fees, identified in Table 3-3, are slightly less than the Financial Commitment or Investment -based fees identified in Table 3-4 indicating that the existing commitment has kept relative pace with law enforcement asset expansion. In order to ensure that proportionality, and its underlying fairness, be maintained the development impact fee schedule identified in Table 3-3, (General PIan Build -out Need -based Development Impact Fees) are the most reasonable for both additional new development and the existing community. The adoption of Table 3-3, and detailed in Schedule 3.2 at the end of the Chapter, would also generate sufficient capital, about 97 % of the full amount identified in the Master Facilities Plan, to construct most of the law enforcement facilities and capital equipment needed to absorb the new demands generated by the City's continued new development while maintaining proportionality with the commitment demonstrated by the existing community. The remaining 3% would need to come from other sources. Huntington Beach 201I-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 35 Item 9. - 229 611 HB -364- Chapter 3 Law Enforcement Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment RECAP OF RECOMMENDED LAW ENFORCEMENT FACILITIES, VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES • Adopt Schedule 3.2, General Plan Build -out Needs -based development Impact Fees for the seven basic new land -uses. CHAPTER ENDNOTES 1. The twelve month period spanning 2009. 2. Stated slightly differently, we could expect that any randomly selected thirty homes would generate about ten calls in a given year. 3. Again, this is not intended to imply that each officers annul work effort is limited to only 260.79 calls -for - service. Patrol officers respond to a far greater number of calls -for -service. Investigators may spend an entire year on only a few cases, while officers involved in management of the Department do not necessarily respond to any. The 260.79 calls -for -service is only an average and represent the composite calls -for -service workload distributed between the entire 235 sworn officers. 4. This is almost the same as the average of 365.0 square foot per officer of six cities (with greater than 85 officers) where RCS has conducted similar analyses. Those six municipalities include Huntington Beach, Anaheim, Ontario, Riverside, Chino and Corona. The average for twenty cities (of all sizes) is 353.6 square feet per sworn officer. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 36 616 HB -365- Item 9. - 230 Schedule 3.1 N City of Huntington Beach w 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Identification of Projects and Cost Allocation Law Enforcement Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment LE-001 Additional Law Enforcement Facility Space $7,597,165 LE-002 Acquire Additional Response Vehicles $1,751,040 LE-003 Acquire Additional Sworn Office Issued Equipment $327,690 LE-004 Acquire Law Enforcement Specialty Equipment $425,000 SUB -TOTAL ESTIMATED NEW PROJECT COSTS $10,100,895 LESS: Existing Law Enforcement Impact Fee Fund Balance $0 SUB -TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS $0 Total - Law Enforcement Capital Project Needs I $10,100,895 NOTES: 1. Costs distribution based upon a 10% sampling of Police Department "Calls -for -Service" statistics. w v AmbUnt Altocat@cf ;' WA faIrmrnafe torreral Plan Fk�5tlRt,� LJ@frlC.I@hC185 !: ltfBW'�1A�eiQ%1l'ftel4t, Pere�rtE< Apportran Pent ApfirGorrea! Need ` Dollar V. Aleed Dollar 295.. $224,116 2i55i $51,656 2 b/a5 $9,667 LL�2R5?/Q. $12,538 2 95?L4 $297,976� a.00. $0 $0 $297,976 l. .`! �J � .L•Yi.. 97.050A $7,373,049 97.05% $1.699,384 97.05% $318,023 97.05% $412,463 97.05� $9,802,919 0.0 $0 0.00% $0 97,050 $9,802,919 (�trward io SGt�tlule � �'�<? Revenu )st Specialists, L.L.C. Full( CA 92831 Schedule 3.2 City of Huntington Beach 2010-11 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report General Plan Build -out Needs -based Development Impact Costs (Fees) Law Enforcement Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment CD Detached Dwelling Units (1) 295.0 1,749 0.341 597.18 7.07% $692,944 $2,349 5.93 $396 per Unit Attached Dwelling Units 111.2 5,307 0.702 3,725.83 44.10% $4,323,304 $38,879 47.72 $815 per Unit Mobile Home Dwelling Units 1.0 9 0.318 2.86 0.03% $3,319 $3,319 9.00 $369 per Unit Hotel/Motel Lodging Units 18.6 818 0.393 321.08 3.80% $372,568 $20,031 43.98 $455 per Unit Resort Lodging Units 9.3 535 0.459 245.35 2.90% $284,694 $30,612 57.53 $532 per Unit Commercial/Office Uses 39.8 2,417,000 0.897 2,168.07 25.66% $2,515,742 $63,210 60,729 $1.041 per S.F. Industrial/Manufacturing Use 187.0 3,638,000 0.381 1 1,387.80 1 16.430/b $1,610,348 $8,611 19,455 sa443 peraF. CrJ YUTAL'; ` 661 9 - 0 '' 9 2 9 9 r# Ta al ` w Enf ` e �'' et81 s to Corti lete sfe w Oo t.N W Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 Iv cD Schedule 3.3 tv City of Huntington Beach w 20 10- 11 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report w Community Financial Commitment or Equity -based Proportionality Test Fees Law Enforcement Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment 21 Nryposed Land Use f3eve/oped Gall GdcPandrl Hate xrsting` Calls for ServrcQ:; . PpMentage of Existi 9 Servrce,Ca!!s Ihltastructure . "Equity^ n -i of " urf b . E9 y per:4cre Ava�rage UR�ts: ;; or 5 uare 9 1=a�9C/74crrr CurrentFir►andal .` Ctiirtmltrlent er Unit.:: ar;SgGtr� re foot /tames Units :; Detached Dwelling Units(1) 6,436.0 38,616 0.341 13,185.0 22.17% v $15,793,603 $2,454 6.00 $409 per Unit $841 per Unit Attached Dwelling Units 1,805.4 36,108 0.702 25,350.0 42.62% $30,365,403 $16,819 20.00 Mobile Home Dwelling Units 204.6 2,865 0.318 910.0 1.53% 0.71% 0.620/0 $1,090,040 $503,096 $444,401 $5,328 $15,063 14.00 32.04 $380 per Unit $470 perUnJt HoteltMotel Lodging Units 33.4 1,070 0.393 420.0 Resort Lodging Units 20.2 809 0.459 371.0 $22,000 40.05 $549 per Unit Commercial/Office Uses 841.9 12,836,000 0.897 11,514.0 19.36% $13,792,002 $16,382 15,246 $1.074 per S.F. Industrial/Manufacturing Use 930.3 20,261,000 0.381 7,729.0 12.99% $9,258,154 $9,952 21,779 $0,457 per S.F. l and Ilse Units ttt ' Acres . . ;; Ca!!sArihual Serlrrde . t`c3l15 :. Per flnrt:. Detached Dwelling Units 38,616 13,185 0.341 Attached Dwelling Units 36,108 25,350 0.702 Mobile Home Units 2,865 1.070 910 420 0.318 0.393 Hotel/Motet Units Resort Units 809 371 11,514 0.459 0.897 Commercial/Office KSF 12,836 Industrial KSF 20,261 7,729 0.381 Revenut ,st Specialists, L.L.C. Fulle ',A 92831 Chapter 4 Fire Suppression/Medic Facilities. Vehicles. and Equipment While the majority of these requests for service were made by residents of Huntington Beach from their homes, a large percentage of requests were generated from existing commercial/office and industrial uses within the City. A survey of each land use and its existing effect on requests for calls -for -service was conducted to determine existing service ratios and thus be able to project the impact of future development on fire services. This survey was undertaken similarly to the process used to determine law enforcement demand as described in Chapter 3, Law Enforcement. Only requests for fire and medic services to privately held property were counted. Calls -for - service to public property such as City parks and public right-of-way or intersections were not included which, in effect, distributes these calls pro-rata through the calls -for -service from privately held property. This is based upon the argument that all public land serves privately held land in some manner. Table 4-1, following, identifies the number of requests for service received by the Fire Department during the period of July 1, 2008 and June 30, 2009, by land use (detached dwelling, attached dwelling, mobile home, resort hotel/motel, commercial/office, and industrial). The number of calls -for -service received by the Fire Department for each of the major land -uses during the year was then divided by either the existing number of dwelling units (for residential uses) or the developed acres (for commercial, office and industrial uses) to determine the number of requests generated per dwelling unit or commercial or an industrial acre. Table 4-1 Average Annual Existing Responses Per Unit Or Acre - = Azmual - Anal=Calls _Lanlse _dwellings-- - Rooms�or-: Gils fob _ per_Unit _ — Detached Dwelling Units 38,616 4,762 0.123/Unit Attached Dweili Units 36,108 1,846 0.051/Unit Mobile Home Units 2,865 607 0.212/Unit Hotel/Motel Units 1,070 51 0.048/Unit Resort Lodging Units 809 86 0.106/Unit Commercial & Office KSF 12,836,000 565 0.044IKSF Industrial KSF 20,261,000 82 0.004/KSF Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 45 Item 9. - 239 6z5 HB -374- Chapter 4 Fire Suppression/Medic Facilities. Vehicles, and Equipment The beach/City right-of-way areas generated 195 calls for service. Of residential land uses, the occupants of an attached dwelling unit are less likely, by less than half as much, to require an emergency fire service response at 0.051 annual responses per unit, than the occupants of a detached dwelling unit at 0.123 annual responses per unit. CommerciaUOffice development is shown to generate 0.044 responses per 1, 000 square feet of building pad, while industrial development generates a minimal response demand of 0.004 calls per 1, 000square feet of building pad. The lower demand by industrial uses over commercial/office uses should be expected given the greater density of employees and patrons in a commercial or office establishment when compared to an industrial business of similar building size. However, it should be noted that while there are fewer calls for industrial properties, significant specialty training is required to be prepared for industrial responses, (i.e., confined space and hazardous materials training). Table 4-2 indicates that, given the high density of rooms and accompanying facilities, an acre of resort development, creates the highest demand for fire services, thus the development impact fee for that land use is the highest, on an average acreage basis. Table 4-2 Calls -for -service by Land -use an Acre Basis bid 1C�1s Units_ a� �4.nn Detached Dwelling Units 0.123 6 0.74 Attached Dwelling Units 0.051 20 1.02 Mobile Home Dwelling Units 0.212 14 2.97 Hotel/Motel Lodging Units 0.048 32 1.53 Resort Lodging Units 0.106 40 4.25 Commercial/Office Uses (per KSF) 0.044 1 15,246 1 0.67 Industrial/Manufacturing Uses (KSF) 0.004 1 21,779 1 0.09 Based on the existing rate of responses by land use, the increased number of fire suppression/medic service responses generated by future residential, commercial/office and office Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 46 62s HB -375- Item 9. - 240 Chapter 4 Fire Suppression/Medic Facilities. Vehicles, and E ui meet development was extrapolated. This was accomplished by multiplying the average responses per unit or 1,000 square feet (KSF), established in Table 4-1, by the number of anticipated dwelling units, commercial rooms or business KSF. Table 4-3, following, indicates the number of additional calls -for -service that could be anticipated from the development of currently vacant land within the City's planning area. Table 4-3 Additional Annual Ore Suppression/Medic Responses Generated by Future Anticipated Development -= — = _ - '_ire�� F�ic, Responses =Jmts= Potential __ �ddtt�onal annual 1~ Detached Dwelling Units 0.123/unit 1,749 units 215.68 calls Attached Dwelling Units 0.051/unit 5,307 units 271.32 calls Mobile Home (in parks) 0.212/unit 9 units 1.91 calls Hotel/Motel Units 0.048/unit 818 units 38.99 calls Resort Lodging Units 0.106/unit 535 units 56.87 calls Commercial/Office Uses 0.044/KSF 2,417 KSF 106.39 calls Industrial Uses 0.0401KSF 34638 KSF 14.72 calls Total — - — 705.88 calls Proposed Capital Expenses. The total cost of the required improvements to the City's investment of fire suppression/medic facilities, vehicles and specialty equipment was previously estimated to be $11,941,972 with an offset of $700,000 from the proceeds of sale of the to -be vacated Heil Station #8. Roughly 46.4 % has been identified as required to serve the net new calls -for -service resulting from development or up -sizing due to redevelopment. Projects FS-001 through FS-006 are capacity -increasing and have been determined by City staff to be necessary to accommodate the anticipated additional calls -for -service from new development or for a more appropriate aerial unit. When this cost is distributed the various land -uses and the demands created by each, a proportional cost is determined, by development unit. Table 4-4, summarized from Schedule 4.2, indicates the proportional cost by land -use unit. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 47 Item 9. - 241 627 HB -376- Chapter 4 Fire Suppression/Medic Facilities Vehicles and Eguui Table 4-4 General Plan Build -out Needs Fire Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment Development Impact Fees d� - - Detached Dwelling Units $1,693,338 $968/Unit Attached Dwelling Units $2,130,176 $401/Unit Mobile Home Units (in arks) $14,996 $1,666/Unit Hotel/Motel Units $306,117 $374/Unit Resort Lodging Units $446,495 $835/Unit Commercial/Office Uses $835,285 $0.346/S.F. Industrial Uses $115,569 $0.032/S.F. Existing City Financial Commitment. The replacement value of the existing fire infrastructure (parcel and station, response fleet and related safety/specialty equipment) at a net $61,234,227 (includes the potential sale of the Heil Station) was referenced earlier in this Chapter. This represents the current investment or financial commitment by the existing community toward fire suppression/medic capability/capacity. When this figure is distributed over the existing development in the same manner as were the future costs, by the land use demands, an average investment, or financial commitment (or equity for that matter) per unit is determined. The results are summarized in Table 4-5 (from Schedule 4.3). As an example, each detached dwelling unit has "invested" over the lifetime of the City, about $922 (as identified in Table 4-5 following) into fire suppression/medic capital, an amount that is about 95 % of the General Plan Build -out Needs - based Development Impact Fee schedule identified in the previous Table 4-4 and detailed in Schedule 4.3. The current community's commitment has established the eight response station capacities and was paid for through years of General Fund receipts. To allow future residents to benefit by use of all of the capital needs without contributing additional assets, could endanger the existing residents and businesses. Table 4-5, following, summarizes the distribution of the $ in replacement costs to the existing community, (Schedule 4.3 indicates this in greater detail). Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 48 C-« HB -377- Item 9. - 242 Chapter 4 Fire Suppression/Medic Facilities, Vehicles, and Equipment Table 4-5 Existing Fire Suppression/Medic Existing Community Financial Commitment Detached Dwelling Units $35,586,696 $922/Unit Attached Dwelling Units $13,795,263 $382/Unit Mobile Home Units (in arks) $4,536,145 $1,583/Unit Hotel/Motel Units $381,126 $356/Unit Resort Lodging Units $642,683 $792/Unit Commercial/Office Uses $4,222,277 $0.329/S.F. Industrial Uses $612,791 $0.030/S.F. Other (beach area) $1,457,246 NA Of importance is the fact that the Community Financial Commitment or Equity -based costs on Table 4-5 are just slightly higher, at roughly 105%, than the proposed General Plan Build -out - based impact fees as demonstrated in Table 4-4. This indicates that the City is just slightly behind in its cumulative and proportional investment in needed fire suppression/medic facilities, vehicles and equipment. RESULTING DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES Since the equity position of the existing community is slightly less than the General Plan Build -out Needs -based development impact fees necessary for expansion, the current Community Financial Commitment or Equity -based Proportionality Test -based Development Impact Fees, as identified in Table 4-5 and Schedule 4.3, would be the most equitable fee schedule to adopt. Resulting Development Impact Cost Distribution. The collection of the proposed development impact fee, through build -out would allow the City to provide a great deal (44.7 %) of the proposed expansions and most of the equipment, but not all of it. It would fall about $6.0 million short of financing all of the required improvements attributed to new development. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 49 Item 9. - 243 629 HB -378- Chapter 4 Fire Su ppressionlMedic Facilities Vehicles and Equipment OTHER NOTES AND ISSUES 1. The City will need to monitor the approval of conditional uses within industrial zoned development where newly constructed industrial developments. These land uses are initially have the lower industrial use development impact fees imposed when constructed as "spec" buildings but end up being used, with a CUP, for commercial/office uses. These commercial/office uses generate far greater demand than the industrial uses. If left unchecked, the Fire Department, as well as other City services, will be faced with the greater demand from the actual commercial/office uses but will be left only with the collection of the far lower industrial use development impact fee rates. To avoid this under collection, the City should impose an impact fee representing the difference between the commercial/office development impact fee and the previously paid industrial land -use impact fee when a CUP is approved and tenant improvement plans are submitted indicating a commercial or office use. RECAP OF RECOMMENDED FIRE SUPPRESSION/MEDIC FACILITIES, VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES. 0 Adopt Schedule 4.3 General Plan Build -out Needs -based for the seven basic land -uses. CHAPTER ENDNOTES 1. The response data is generated from Department response incident data used to complete the annual National Fire Incident Report (NFIR's). Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 50 630 HB -379- Item 9. - 244 CD E Schedule 4. 1 tv City of Huntington Beach -4, 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report (-Ih Identification of Projects and Cost Allocation UJ Oc Ip Fire SuppressionlMedic Facilities and Vehicles csrimared SUB -TOTAL ESTIMATED NEW PROJECT COSTS -J- $11,941,972 $6,399,997 LESS: Existing Fire Suppression Impact Fee Fund Balance $0 $0 Sale of Property (Heil Station) ($700,0-00) -1 Go ad%,, ($700,000) SUB -TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS ($700,0011) Total - Fire Suppression/Medic Capital Project Needs $11,241—,9-72] NOTES: 1. The cost distribution is based upon annual Fire Department "Calls -for -Service" statlstics (INFIRs), Uh P- 50.000/0 $3,584,735 25.000/a $429,011 50.000/0 $633,229 50. DO% $370,000 50.00%, $262,500 50.000/01 $262,500 1 1 46.41%1 0.000i $0 0.0 $0 k 0.000/0 49.300A Rervenut )st Speclallsts, L.L.C. Fulle "A 92831 Schedule 4.2 City of Huntington Beach 2011--12 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report General Plan Build -out Needs -based Development Impact Costs (Fees) Fire Suppression/Medic Facilities and Vehicles pM?QsOp Land 1J88 Undeveloped Gall Gcncraliorr Rate Expected IVaw Ca1lS for Some. PerGeWc7ge of Additional . Service Calls Allocation of Eklvdrtslo� Casts Cost Distribution PerAcre Avela99 UnitS or 5WrdrQ FgeW re Development Ir71t7 Ct FeS� pel Unit or Square Foot Acres Ur1its Detached Dwelling Units (1) 295.00 1,749 0.123 215.68 30.55% $1,693,338 $5,740 5.93 $.968 per Unit Attached Dwelling Units 111.20 5,307 0.051 271.32 38.440k $2,130,176 $19,156 47.72 $401 per Unit Mobile Home Dwelling Units 1.00 9 0.212 1.91 0.27% $14,996 $14,996 9.00 $1,666 per Unit Hotel/Motel Lodging Units 18.60 818 0.048 38:99 5.52% $306,117 $16,458 43.98 $374 per Unit Resort Lodging Units 9.30 535 0.106 56.87 8.06° $446,495 $48,010 57.53 $635 per Unit Commercial/Office Uses 39.80 2,417,000 0.044 106.39 15.070/b $835,285 $20,987 60,729 $0.346 per S.F. Industrial/Manufacturing Us 187.00 3,638,000 1 0.004 14.72 2.09% $115,569 $618 19,455 $0.032 per SF. Cd TALI f i _90 - 7i 88. 10(1.00p $5,5 1:� 75 in Total ire sup i i ri G p[t2li tilei S to fiintsfti Syst 'i7t w 00 N Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 Schedule 4.3 tv City of Huntington Beach 41 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Community Financial Commitment or Equity -based Proportionality Test Fees c`a 00 (1.N Fire Suppression/Medic Facilities and Vehicles (t .Land tlSe' bevel �9G!: Call Generatioll Rate Existing Calls for I Service ot, Wing $6rWoe Calls Infrastructure aE uit q y" rJrstrlitipn of 'Equity " per Acre Average Units or Square ' FeellAcre Current 1✓in�hGial Commitment por Unit or Square 1✓oat acres Lfn►7s Detached Dwelling Units (1) 6,436.00 38,616 0.123 4,762.0 58.120/a $35,586,696 $5,529 6.00 $922 per Unit Attached Dwelling Units 1,805.40 36,108 2,865 0.051 0.212 1,846.0 607.0 22.53% 7.410/a $13,795,263 $4,536,145 $7,641 $22,171 $11,411 20.00 $382 per Unit Mobile Home Dwelling Units 204.60 33.40 14.00 $1,583 per Unit $356 per Unit Hotel/Motel Lodging Units 1,070 0.048 51.0 0.62% $381,126 32.04 Resort Lodging Units 20.20 809 0.106 86.0 1.050 $642,683 $31,816 40.05 $794 per Unit $0.329 perS.F_ CommerciallOfflce Uses 841,90 930.30 12.836,000 0.044 565.0 6.90% _ $4,222,277 $612,791 $5,015 15,246 Industrial/Manufacturing Use 20,261,000 0.004 82.0 1.000/0 $659 21,779 $0.030 per S.F. Beach Area 195.0 2.38% $1,457,246 IOTA w - - 8;194 0 iEiO:OOg6 $61,234,227 in_Zatal:Equttyin Current Fire Suppression Assets $57,999 718 in EA' sfi6jilm Suppression Fecllltles ($3,250,473) Tess Hell Station #8 (to be relocated), $700,000 Proceeds.of Sale of Heil Station #8 $9 g%F.;, i(l In F�clstii g Fire Suppression Vehicles. $537 780 in FxiStj6dg QOmputerlOectronic Fire. Equipment ` $1 0100.- fighter Assigned Equipment. -esorrn4.:. i}.Exh e�actFeeFund Bce, . Revenu )st Specialists, L.L.C. Fulk CA 92831 Chapter 5 Circulation (Streets, Signals, and Bridges stem [This space left vacant to place the following table on a single page]. Table 5-1 Comparison of Circulation System Attributes �_nfrastcture lEx3stutgutuFL- - Totalt Fts _..- _ Number of Trip -miles Compniommut 3,135,213 -- 370,924 . Bid3-out 3,50b1137 _-:.Peeutage.o52-6taT Cost of Total System $533,539,375 $26,608,410 $560,147,785 - _'ercentae of'1`ota .= - . == 9S2°lo- _ ._ -.8 °10.:- --- =1Qo The Relationship Between the Need for the Facility and the Type of Development Project. There is a reasonable relationship between the need for the proposed circulation projects and the types of developments on which the fees would be imposed. New residents and new business owners will utilize the community's existing circulation system which will then require a number of street, signal and bridge improvements to maintain the existing level -of -service (LOS) enjoyed by the existing community. Schedule 5.1 identifies the additional traffic to be generated by new development, by type of development. The technical volume, Trip Generation (Manual) 7th Edition, produced by the Institute of Traffic Engineers, has been used to identify part of the nexus, or the relationship between the type of development and the projected number of trips that development will generate. The nexus will be based upon the combined factors of trip fi equency and trip distance. New Trip Adjustment for Pass -by or Diverted Trips (trip frequeney factors). Schedule 5.2 contains a sub -schedule that identifies adjustments to new total trip -ends. As an example, an acre of general commercial use would be expected, on average, to generate about 381 daily trip -ends. However, approximately 15 % of those trip -ends, or about 57 trip -ends per day, are pass -by trip - ends, in that, the trip -end is not truly an end but is actually a one in a series of stops, i.e. at various commercial establishments, with a different location such as a residence as the final trip - end or destination of the series of trip -ends. In order to be considered a pass -by trip, the location of the stop must be contiguous to the generator; route, i.e. the route that would have been used even if the temporary stop had not been made'. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) indicates that: Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 59 Item 9. - 253 639 HB -388- Chapter 5 Circulation (Streets. Signals, and Bridges sY tem Thus when forecasted trips based upon the trip generation rates are distributed to the adjacent streets, some reduction is made to account for those trips already there that will be attracted to the proposed developments Pass -by trip -ends are fully adjusted (reduced at 100%) from the average trip -ends (per day) generated by the eleven land uses identified in Schedules 5.2 and 5.3. A diverted trip is similar to a pass -by trip -end in that it is an extra stop between, as an example, a motorist's work site and his or her residence. A diverted trip differs slightly in that it requires a minor deviation from the normal generator route and the temporary stop. In short, a diverted trip -end creates a separate side trip using additional (and different) lane miles from that of the normal route from the motorist's place of employment and his or her home6. These trip -ends increase the traffic volume from the generator route only for brief distances. The ITE adds that diverted trips: are produced from traffic volume on roadways within the vicinity of the generator (route) and require a diversion from that roadway to another roadway with access to the site. These roadways could include streets or freeways adjacent to the generator but without access to the generator.' These diverted trip -ends will be adjusted (reduced at an assumed 50 %) from the full trip -end count for each of the land uses identified in the Chapter 2. Again, the trip -end adjustment schedule at the bottom of Schedule 5.2 indicates the total daily trip - ends reduced by the number of pass -by trips (at 100 %) and diverted trips (at 50 %). The trip pass - by and diversion percentages were generated by a study conducted by the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) in conjunction with various U.S. and California agencies'. Average Trip Distances by Land Use (trip distance factors). Additionally, the same SANDAG data schedule referenced above provides information for a trip distance factor component to the nexus. Based upon that data, a trip to an industrial work -site has the greatest distance at 9.0 miles. A trip to an office average 8.8 miles, a residential trip averages 7.9 miles, a trip from a hotel or motel (once in residence) averages 7.6 miles, and an average trip to a commercial site is the shortest at 4.3 miles. This indicates that drivers are generally willing travel further distances to work and for treatment at medical offices than they are to shop. Both frequency (trip -ends) and distances (average miles per trip) have been combined into the nexus by combining frequency and distance, the two major factors of circulation master planing. When the trip frequency and trip distance factors are combined, a 200-unit attached dwelling residential specific plan would generate about 4,620 daily trip -miles (200 unit's X 23.1 daily trip - Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 60 640 HB -389- Item 9. - 254 Chapter 5 Circulation (Streets, Signals, and Bridges) System miles per unit) and a ten -acre commercial -retail development would generate 4,955 daily trip -miles (10 acres X 32.6 trip-miles/K.S.F. X 15,246/1,000 S.F.). Each would pay their proportionate share of the total 370,924 newly created trip -miles expected at General Plan build -out. In the case of the detached dwelling development, the 4,620 daily trip -miles generated by the new 200 attached dwellings represents about 1.25 % of the 370,924 total new trip -miles anticipated at build - out; thus they would be required to contribute financially to the DIF fund or construct projects on the DIF list to an amount equal to 1.49 % of the total development -related project costs. The 4,955 daily trip -miles generated by the ten acres of commercial development represent 1,34% of the total 370,924 new trip -miles anticipated at build -out. As a result they would be required to contribute financially to the DIF fund or construct projects on the DIF list to an amount equal to 1.34 % of the total development -related project costs. The Relationship Between the Amount of the Fee and the Cost of the portion of the Facility Attributed to the Development Project. Again, the calculation of the Circulation System Development Impact Fee is based upon the recognition that differing types of developments generate differing numbers of trip -ends. The fee is based upon the projected number of trip -miles generated by the proposed private development project. Circulation System Development Impact fee receipts will be accumulated until they reach the amount necessary to construct a meaningful project to alleviate or mitigate the demands of those new developments. Table 5-2 (summarized from Schedule 5.2) following, identifies the General Plan Build -out based Circulation System Impact Fee Schedule based upon the net $26,608,410 in identified capacity -increasing projects. Table 5-2 General Plan Build -out Based Circulation System Impact Fees T _ u - Allocattoi3r __.gf Eosts= - Tntal _Cost Detached Dwelling Units $4,341,072 $2,482/Unit Attached Dwelling Units $8,794,196 $1,657/Unit Mobile Home Units (in arks) $11,693 $1,299/Unit Hotel/Motel Units $903,562 $1,105/Unit Resort Lodging Units $1,024, 741 $1, 915/Unit Commercial/Office Uses $5,635,037 $2.33l/S.F. Industrial/Manufacturin Uses $5,898,019 $1.621IS.F. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 61 Item 9. - 255 641 HB -390- Chapter S Circulation (Streets, Signals, and Bridges) System Again, adoption of this set of proposed fees would generate the total revenue necessary to construct a significant portion (about 93 %) of the needed street, traffic signal and bridge construction projects. The shortfall is largely due to removing new "passthrough" trips from new development outside of the City limits from the calculation. These figures, however, need to be compared to the existing community financial commitment demonstrated by the existing circulation assets to identify the level of fairness in adopting this schedule of development impact fees. Proportionality Test. Table 5-3, following (and summarized from Schedule 5.3) identifies the assets of the existing system (at current construction and acquisition costs). The $533,539,375 consists of the existing $431.6 million in circulation plan arterial/collector streets, $96.8 million in traffic signals and intersection improvements and $5.0 million in major bridges inventory. There is also a $200,000 balance in the Circulation System Development Impact Fee fund balance. When the combined $533.6 million is distributed over the existing community, using the identical nexus factor used for distribution future costs, the existing community has contributed the following, on average, by land use: Table 5-3 Existing Circulation System Community Commitment Comparison Development Impact Fees _ � A = 3arrdl�se - Alloeation - Tnfal _Cs�s1z- - Detached Dwelling Units $227,375,119 $5,888/Unit Attached Dwelling Units $141,943,317 $3,931/Unit Mobile Home Dwelling Units $8,824,837 $3,080/Unit Hotel/Motel Lod in Units $2, 804,166 $2,621 /Unit Resort Lodging Units $3,675,809 $4,544/Unit Commercial/Office Uses $70,992,504 $5.531/S.F. Industrial/Manufacturing Uses $77,923,618 $3.846/S.F. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 62 642 1413 -391- Item 9. - 256 Chapter 5 Circulation (Streets. Signals. and Bridges) System Of importance is that the existing community has contributed, on average, far more, (at nearly 237 %) than would be required of future development to meet the General Plan build -out needs for all users. This indicates that there is no proportionality issue as the future community is being asked to contribute at a far lesser amount (at about 42 %) than has been contributed by the existing community. Alternative Cost Methodology. A more precise calculation of costs for specific types of land uses (i.e., banks, hospitals, convalescent homes, etc.) can be determined by multiplying the average cost per trip of $71.74 by the applicable daily trip -mile rate. An example of this calculation can be found in Schedule 5.3 at the end of the Chapter and applied to Table 5-4, on the following page. These tables list trip -mile rates and costs for various residential, resort, industrial and commercial developments. A fee system based on a lengthy schedule of trip -mile rates theoretically provides greater accuracy and therefore greater equity in determining specific uses demand on the City's circulation system, but at the same time may increase the City's administrative costs to administer the fee. A more extensive listing of traffic generators by land use is available in Trip Generation as published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, New York, NY and SANDAG. [This space left vacant to place the following table on a single page]. Huntington Beach 201142 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 63 Item 9. - 257 643 1413 -392- Chapter 5 Circulation (Streets. Signals, and Bridges! ! vsteni Table 5-4 Detail of Circulation System Financial Commitment -based Impact fees for Specific Business Uses Adjusted Average Trip -end Additional Cost per Cost per 1, 000 Square LAND USE j Trip ends Distance to Trjp Trip -miles j Trip rnilc Feet of Dwelling Unit ZESIDENTIAL LAND:USFS,(ncr Unit): - Detached Dwelling 8.76 7.9 0.5 34.60 $71.74 $2,482.20 /Unit Apartment I 6.15 7.9 0.51 24.3 $71.74 ! $I, 743.28 /L/nit Condontinium/Townhome 5.36 7.9 0.51 21.2 $71.74 1! $1,520.89 /Unit Mobile Home Dwelling 4.57 7.9 0.51 18.1 $71.74 $1,299.49 /Unit IRESORT/TOURIST (ndr Knit or Pantry Door): Hotel 629 7-6 0-5 23.9 $71.74 $1, 714.59 /Room All Suites Hotel 3.77 _ 7.6 0.5 14.3 $71.74 $1,025.88 /Room Motel 4,34 7.6 0.5 16.5 $71.74 $1,183.71 lRoom IIVDUSTRIAL (per 1,000SF). General Light Industrial Heavy Industrial Manufacturing j COMMERCIAL (per _ 1;000 SF Office Park Research Park Business Park Bldg. Materials/Lumber Store Garden Center Movie Theater Church Alcdical-Dental Office General Office Building (Shopping Center rlospital Discount Cater Kigh-Turnover ReNtuurant Convenience Market Walk-in Bank Orher�.Innr.nvsilAhlc "ncrKSF" Cemctary (per acre) Scavicc Station1markct (avg) Service Station and Car Wash 6.17 9.0 0.5 �___27,8_ $71.74 - -- $1,994.37 IKSF 5.97 9.0 0.5 26.9 - $71.74 $1,929.81 IKSF 2.7.3 9.0 0.51 12.3 $71.74 $882.40 IKSF 4.39 9.0 0.51 19.8 $71.74 $1,420,45 IKSF 7.42 i 8.8 0.5 32.6 $71.74 $2,338.72 IKSF 5.01 8.8 0.5 2-2.0 $71.74 $1,578.28 IKSF 9.341 8.8 0.5 41.1 $71.74 $2,948.51 IKSF 29. 35 ; 4.3 0.5 63.1 $71.74 $4,526.79 IKSF 23.451 4.31 0.5 50.4 $71.74 $3,615.70 IKSF 2.471 4.3 0.5 5.3 $71.74 $380.22 IKSF 5.921 4.3 0.5 12.7 $71.74 $911.10 IKSF 22.21 8.8 0.5 97.7 $71.74 $7, 009.00 IKSF 716 8.8 0.5 31.5 $71.74 $2,259.81 IKSF 30.20 4.3 0.5 64.9 $71.74 $4,655.93 IKSF 11.42 4.3 0.5 24.6 $71.74 $1,764.80 IKSF 62.93 4.3 0.5 135.3 $71.74 $9,706.42 IKSF 8.90 4.3 0.5 19.1 $71.74 $1,370.23 IKSF 43.57 4.3 0.5 93.7 $71. 74 $6, 722 04 IKSF 13,97 �W 4.3 0.5 30.0 $71.74 $2,152.20 IKSF - 3,07 431 0.5 6.6 $71.74 $473.48 More, 107. 6.9 4.31 0.5 231.5 - - $71.74 $16, 607.81 IFPIDey (4) 99.35 4.31 0.5 213.6 ' $71.74 $15, 323.66 IFPIDay (4) NOTES: 1. ADT = Avcra,ac Daily Trips 2. KSF= Tbausand Square Felt of Gross Floor Area 3. Adjusted for Pass -by and Diverted Trips. 4. FP1DaY = per 'fueling Position' per day. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Illlpact Fee Calculation Report IS HB - 9 3- Item 9. - 258 Chapter 5 Circulation (Streets, Signals, and Bridges) System RESULTING DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES The contribution of the existing community as evidenced in Table 5-3, Community Financial Commitment -based Proportionality Test Fees is far greater than what is to asked of future development (Table 5-2) the General Plan Build -out Needs -based Development Impact Fee schedule is adequate and reasonable for adoption. It would be more than adequate for the usual and normal application to the seven broad land -uses. as the fairest schedule of impact fees. However, it is further recommended that there should also be the option for the engineering staff to apply the per trip -mile fee from Schedule 5.2 multiplied by the specific use Table 5-4 or the more extensive listing of traffic generators by land use (available in Trip Generation as published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, New York, N.Y.) multiplied by the SANDAL land - use trip distances. RECAP OF RECOMMENDED (LOCAL) CIRCULATION SYSTEM, VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES. 0 Adopt Schedule 5.2. for the seven basic new land -uses including the per Daily Trip -mile rate with standard ITE trip -end rates for the application to unusual or highly specific development proposals. • Adopt Table 5-4 for application on specific business uses as necessary by engineering staff, as well as the table at the bottom of Schedule 5.2 to allow City staff to calculate specific Circulation System DIFs, based upon ITE data not necessarily highlighted on Table 5-4. [This space left vacant to place the Chapter Endnotes on a single page] . Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 65 Item 9. - 259 645 HB -394- Chapter 5 Circulation (Streets, Signals, and Bridges) S sy tem CHAPTER ENDNOTES 2.For complete definitions and standards, see the City of Huntington Beach General Plan Circulation Element as part of the Infrastructure and Community Services Chapter page I11-CE-1. Further description of the components of the Element are on page 111-CE-2 and III-CE-3. 3."The normal route between a daily work -site and the residence of the motorist. 4.As an example, a motorist travels the same route from work to home daily. On some number of occasions, the motorist stops at a market along the route to pick up some groceries. These stops at the market would be considered pass -by trips in that they do not generate an additional trip along that route. 5.Trip Generation, Institute of Traffic Engineers, 525 School Street, SW., Ste. 410, Washington D.C. 20024- 2729, Chapter 111, Definition of Terms, Pass -by Trips, page 1-7. 6.An example of a diverted trip would be a single trip where, along the way from work, a motorists evening drive home deviates from the normal route taken home to stop at perhaps a preferred grocery store, drop mail off at a post office and pick up a child from piano lesson before continuing home. Each of these three stops would be considered diverted trips. 7.Trip Generation, lnstitute of Traffic Engineers, 525 School Street, SW., Ste. 410, Washington D.C. 20024- 2729, Chapter III, Definitions of Terms, Diverted Linked Trips, I-5. 8.Trro7c Generators, San Diego Association of Governments, 401 B Street, Suite 800, San Diego, CA 92101, Brief Guide to Traffic Generation Rates compiled in conjunction with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, U.S. Department of Transportation, the California Department of Transportation and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. July 1995. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 66 HB -395- Item 9. - 260 Schedule 5.1 ' City of Huntington Beach tv O�2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report CnstiariNecds_ ^ CO.r15ttUCttol;Neet9s ~' Identification of Projects and Cost Allocation Suppoaed by IAafJr`lr rgase Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Other Resources w'fiiftasf>3 i1re Capacity _ Estimated Percent Apportioned Percent Apportlonedl.l lrte Descr/ptiolr - cash Need Dollar Cast /vow Dollar Cost l� ST-001 Beach Boulevard and Edinger Avenue $600,000 ST-002 Beach Boulevard and Heil Avenue $1,000,000 ST-003 Beach Boulevard and Warner Avenue $400,000 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 _ 9T-004 Beach Boulevard and Slater Avenue _ ST-005 Beach Boulevard and Talbert Avenue __ ST-006 Beach Boulevard and Garfield Avenue Si-007 ST-008 Beach Boulevard and Yorktown Avenue _ Pacific Coast Highway and Warner Avenue $500,000 $2,000,000 ST-009 ST-010 Pacific Coast Highway and Goldenwest Street Pacific Coast Highway and Brookhurst Street $750,000 $750,000 $500,000 ST-011 Goldenwest Street and Bolsa Avenue ST-012 Goldenwest Street and Slater Avenue $50,000 ST-013 ST-014 Newland Street and Talbert Avenue Newland Street and Warner Avenue _ $500,000 $30,000 ST-015 Newland Street and Yorktown Avenue $300,000 ST-016 ST-017 Gothard Street and Slater Avenue Gothard_Street and Talbert Avenue $500,000 $264,000 $8,600 ST-018 Ward Street and Garfield Avenue ST-019 Brookhurst Street and Adams Avenue $10,000,000 ST-020 Miscellaneous Traffic_ Signals/Intersection Improvements $5,000,000 ST-021 Public Works Maintenance Building $2,820,000 ST-022 Public Works Maintenance Vehicles $65'000 SUB -TOTAL ESTIMATED NEW PROJECT COSTS $28,537,800 LESS - Local Circulatlon Impact Fee Fund Balance ($200,000) Support from Other Agencies ($260,020) ($460,020) SUB -TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS Total - Local Circulation -related Capital Project Needs $28,677,7800 OTES: J1. There are no notes, �,p%, $1,929,390 100, 00/0 (S200,000) 100.0.011/0 ($260,020) 100:000l0 _ ($460,020) S Y YS�.rt;: �•r Y.. •;:: F� Yk ♦ triTf'S��Sh�J .1'. 75.0000 $450,000 95,000/0 -- $950,000 ,95.000 $380,000 n000/a _ $475,000 E004 $620,000 95.00DA $950,000 95,00010 $475,000 95.00% �$1,900,000 88 000/0 $660,000 9500o $712,500 951,00% $475,000 95.001% $47,500 95.v1(3.nlo $475,000 9 fl0�/ $28,500 35O0°/9 $285,000 noob/o $475,000 9;DQP/. $250,800 $8,360 <9v�Dwo $9,500,000 95'AOa/o $4,750,000 ti(SalO $2,679,000 5s4}Q°/ti $61,750 J3 2plo $26,608,410 0.0c I so 0-0011M.1 $0 94.770la $26,608,410 Forward tb Scoedule,5.2 Rever most Specialists, L.L.C. Fullertc 92831 I Schedule 5.2 City of Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report General Plan Build -out Needs -based Development Impact Costs (Fees) Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Undeveloped 1, Daily Trip -end Acrfs units Generation t�rvposed tarot Use 1 Rate Additional Daily Trfp�miles Percent098 of Additional Trip -miles: Allocation of Cost ' Expansion Distribution Costs Per Acre Average Ilnlis or 5tluare Feet/Acre r 5.93 .Development.:. impact P09 per unit or ... oars ruoot ... $2,482 per Unit $4,341,072 $14,715 Detached Dwelling Units 295 1,749 34.60 60,515 16.31% Attached Dwelling Units ill 5,307 23.10 122,592 33.05% $8,794,196 $79,084 47.72 $1,657 per Unit Mobile Home Dwelling U 1 9 18.10 163 0.040/a $11,693 $11,693 9.00 $1,299 per Unit Hotel/Motel Lodging Unit 19 818 15.40 12,597 3.40% $903,652 $45,583 43.98 $1,105 per Unit _ Hotel/Motel Lodging Unit _ 9 535 26.70 14,285 3.85% $1,024,741 $110,187 57.53 $1,915 per Unit Commercial/Offlce Uses 40 2,417,000 32.50 78,553 21.18% $5,635,037 $141,584 60,729 $2331 per S.F. Industrial/Manufacturing 187 3,638,000 22.60 82,219 Y 22.17% $5,898,019 $31,540 19,455 $1.621 per S.F. 7.7 TOTAL �7 .7 662 370;924 160 0. � 6,t30$, 4 0 in t aprtai project Ne S t rniSh> Ircctlaf 0r# $3►6`fOn ALTERNATIVE FEE METHODLOGY 370,924 4>,;W' :`Ax>k;<: `s. $26,608,4i0 $71.74 per Daily Trip -mile Trip -ends Adjustment Calculation Land Use Daily Total Trips Percent of Diverted Trips Diverted Trip % Adjustment Diverted Trip Percent Percent of Pass -by Trips (1) Combined Diverted and Pass -by Remaining Trip % as Adjustment % Adjusted Trip Rate. Adjustment % X Total Trips Average Trip Length Trip -ends X 0.5 X Length Detached Dwellings 9.57 11.0 0.50 5.5 3.0 8.5 91.500/0 8.76 7.9 34.6 Attached Dwellings 6.39 11.0 0.50 5.5 3.0 8.5 -_ 91.500 5.85 7.9 23.1 Mobile Home Units 4.99 11.0 0.50 5.5 _3.0 8.5 91.50% 4.57 7.9 18.1 Hotel/Motel Lodging 5.27 38.0 0.50 19.0 4.0 23.0 77,000/ 4.06 . 15.4 Resort Lodging 9-13 38.0 0.50 19.0 4.0 23.0 77.000/c 7.03 7.6 26.7 Commercial Uses (KSF) 23.25 40.0 0.50 20.0 15.0 35.0 65.00% 15.11 4.3 32.5 Industrial Uses (KSF) 5.68 19.0 0.50 9.5 2.0 11.5 88.504 1. 5.03 9.0 22.6 (1) Pass -by trips adjusted at 100%. rD El rn 110 00 tv N Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 Schedule 5.3 tv City of Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report w Community Financial Commitment or Equity -based Proportionality Test Fees Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System 7vgloped Daily Trip -end existing Percentage j A11c5CaifrriA`:fif D1b7rlbutlorr Averae'Units Current 1"inaricral Acres Units Generation Daily of. Existing { Infrastructure of Equity' or Square Commitment per Unit Proposed land Use Rate Trip --miles Trip -miles II "Equity' per Acre Feet/Acre or Square Foot Detached Dwelling Units 6,436 38,616 34.60 1,336,114 42.62% $227,375,119 $35,329 I 6.00 $5,888 per Unit Attached Dwelling Units 1,805 36,108 23.10 834,095 26.60% $141,943,317 $78,622 20.00 $3,931 per Unit Mobile Home Dwelling U 205 2,865 18.10 51,857 1.65% $8,824,837 $43,132 14.00 $3,080 per Unit Hotel/Motel Lodging Unit 33 1,070 15.401 16,478 0.53% $2,804,166 $83,957 32.04 $2,621 per Unit Resort Lodging Units 20 809 26.70 21,600 _0.69% $3,675,809 $181,971 40.05 $4,544 per Unit Commercial/Office Uses 842 12,836,000 32.50 417,170 13.31% $70,992,504 $84,324 15,246 $5.531 per SF. Industrial/Manufacturing 930 20,261,000 22-60 457,899 14.61°/ $77,923,618 $83,762 21,779 $3,846 perSF. 7QTAL. 10;272 ;.. -- 3135,2Y'3' 1lJt).00° $533,539,375 in Total equity in Current CirCutatioh Systom Assets $431,589,375 in General Plan Circulation Major ;Streets $0 in General Plan Major Streets ROW $5,000,000 in General Plan Circulation Bridges. __ $62,500,000 in General Plan Circulation Intersections $34,250,000 in General Plan OrOulation Signals. $200,1000 In Circulation Impact F60 Fund Balance "' '` "`` ` ``' `' $5, 3,539,375 $170.18 per Daily Trlp-mile ALTERNATIVEFEEMETHODLOGY 3,135,213 ��'-�:m'�;;�;:::�;;?;:; 1.9 Rever, Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullertc . 92831 Chapter 6 Storm Drainage Collection System The Relationship Between the Need for The Public Facilities and the Type of Development Project. There is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facilities and the types of developments on which the fees are imposed. New residents and businesses utilize and impact the community's existing storm drainage system which requires various storm drainage improvements. Upon the identification of the costs of storm drainage facilities, generated by future development, costs must be further distributed for each of the land uses (i.e., commercial and residential uses) based on their estimated storm runoff. Detached and attached residential dwelling development provides the most landscape percentage per parcel and thus the greatest percolation and conversely the least runoff of storm -water. As such, these land uses should not bear the same cost as Commercial/Office or Industrial use developments, both of which generally will have lesser landscape area (or stated another way, have a higher percentage of impervious area) and therefore generate a higher amount of storm water runoff. Schedule 6.1 contains the list of storm water projects identified 4 as necessary to control the storm water runoff resulting from the creation of an impervious surface by future development and also continue to protect the existing developed community. The list consists of hundreds of small projects in six storm drainage zones estimated to cost $207,494,050. For this Report, costs were distributed between land uses on established runoff coefficients. Table 6-1 is the listing of these runoff coefficients employed in this Report.' Table 6-1 Storm Drainage Runoff Coefficients (@ a 2"/hour rainfall) T o osed and3 se - oe t f t3Of-_ Detached Dwelling Units 0.775 Attached Dwelling Units 0.810 Mobile Home Dwelling Units 0.800 Hotel/Motel Lodging Units 0.900 Resort Lodging Units 0.875 Commercial/Office Uses 0.900 IndustriaUManufacturin Uses 0.950 Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 73 Item 9. - 267 653 1-113 -402- Cha ter 6 Storm Drains a Collection stem Since this development impact fee category is an acre -based calculation, (as opposed to the number of units built on an acre), it is determined by applying a drainage factor to the type of land use zone. Differences result between what the City's development rules allows (for the General Plan Build -out Need -based Impact Fee) and what has actually been approved in the past (for the Community Financial Commitment or Proportionality Test) can significantly skew the resulting figures. As, an example, the City anticipates future approval of 5,307 attached dwelling units at roughly 48 units per acre density. However, the 36,108 existing attached dwelling units generate an average density of closer to 20 to 25 units per acre. Assuming a storm drainage impact fee of $5,000 per acre, each existing unit would have an equity share of about $200, ($5,000 per acre =25 units per acre = $200/unit) while the future units would be assessed about $100, ($5,000 per acre _ 48 units per acre = $104/unit). Schedule 6.1 identifies the six storm drainage zones and the projects necessary to provide flood protection and insure the ability to traverse the City during a heavy storm. The project costs total $207,494,050 without any mitigation by Development Impact Fee fund balance. Table 6-2, following, indicates that the 8,303.18 acres of acre -runoff factor created by the currently developed community represents about 92.7 %of the total acre -runoff factor that can be expected at General Plan build -out. Table 6-2 Comparison of Storm Drainage System Attributes Izastru_cture-xx�suig Fine _t�tai a Faof Total Runoff Acre Factor 8,303.18 557.85 8,861.03 'tcen._f Toc1...._ S stem Cost Contribution $203,631,313 $207,494,050 $411,175,363 --49.T At the same time the currently developed community's investment in the existing storm drainage system, at $203,631,313 is a lesser proportion at about 49.5% of the cost of the total system at projected General Plan build -out. Conversely that means that the current vacant and underdeveloped parcels will generate the remaining 6.3 % of the demand expected at General Plan build -out but would, if allocated all of the remaining storm drainage projects would need to Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 74 654 1413 -403- Item 9. - 268 Chapter 6 Storm Drainage Collection System finance the remaining 50.5 % of the total General Plan cost of the system at a guaranteed preventive (and assuredly illegal) development impact fee of about $370,000 per acre. This clearly indicates that the City's storm drainage collection system has not been constructed proportionally and ratably with the amount of storm runoff generated by the development in the City to date. Stated slightly differently, with 92.7% of the City's acreage developed, the storm drainage system should also be close to 92.7 %developed. However, such is not the case. Such a statement can be said of virtually all of Southern California's cities. The most likely reason is that the storm drainage system, without an exclusive revenue source, must compete with other far more needed (or desired) capital projects within the City's limited General Fund. As an example, a $1.0 million dollar signal modification that eliminates significant traffic delays daily, would more likely be funded as compared to a $1.0 million storm drainage project that benefits the community during a few hours of the few rainiest days of the year. A fair cost allocation would be to recognize that future additional drainage represents approximately 6.3 % of the total at General Plan build -out thus should be allocated roughly 6.3 % of the total cost of the remaining projects. Table 6-3, following, indicates the impact fee amounts that would need to be imposed to pay for the cost of completing the portion of the system's collection pipes and channels identified by staff to be financed with impact fees. It would be reasonable to expect future development to finance its proportional share of the identified storm drainage needs without violating the proportionality rule as has been done with other development impact fees in this report. Table 6-3 General Plan Build -out Needs Storm Drainage Facilities Impact Fees Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 75 Item 9. - 269 655 HB -404- Chapter 6 Storm Drainage Collection System The Relationship Between the Use of the Fee and the Type of Development Payin the e Fee. There is a reasonable relationship between the fees' use and the types of projects on which the fees are imposed. The Storm Drainage Collection System Development Impact Fees that are imposed and collected will be used to mitigate the storm water runoff generated by the various types of development. If the development is a commercial/office or industrial1manufacturing property generating a significant amount of runoff, the fee collected will be proportionally higher and will be enough to construct the required additions to the storm drainage system downstream from this development. From time to time the City may require an applicant of a private project to construct an improvement (or portion thereof) that is on the list of required improvements at the end of this Chapter. This is often done to expedite the project for the applicant/developer. The developer should receive a credit for any money expended on this required improvement against their calculated storm drainage collection system impact fee. An ordinance clearly addressing the issue of credits should be prepared and added to the City of Huntington Beach Municipal Code should one not fully exist at this time. The Relationship Between the Amount of the Fee and the Cost of the Portion of the Facility Attributed to the Develo ment Project. Each new development, or demand increasing redevelopment, would finance a proportional amount of the expansion of the City's storm drainage collection system. Similar to the previous findings, the relationship is based upon the projected amount of storm water to be collected, contained and safely transported to flood control channels or rivers as a proportion of the entire amount of storm water to be so conveyed. The downstream collection lines (lines further down from the proposed project but prior the outfall into a river or flood control channel) need to be sized to handle all of the storm -water collected upstream. Storm - water that is collected in one location accumulates with feeder lines along the way and thus the downstream system must be built increasingly larger (at increasing higher material and construction costs) the further it gets away from its source. Table 6-4 distributes the total existing community financial commitment (or equity value) of the existing system, at $203,631,313, consisting of the actual storm drainage pipe, channels and detention basins. Please note that the resulting development impact cost, by land use, is in terms of units such as residential dwellings or commercial/office and industrial/manufacturing square feet of building pad (including multiple floors). [This space left vacant to place the following table on a single page] . Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 76 656 HB -405- Item 9. - 270 Cha ter 6 Storm Drainage Collection &stem Table 6-4 Distribution of Current Equity -based Commitment in Storm Drainage System Collection (or Proportionality Verification) - _ = Eatd Use_ _ _ Allocation - Sytem y per Aare �'ota7 rest P..er tJnit oz�=�. — Detached Dwelling Units $122,325,402 $19,006 $3,168/Unit Attached Dwelling Units $35,863,547 $19,865 $993/Unit Mobile Home Dwelling Units $4,013,573 $19,617 $1,401/Unit Hotel/Motel Lodging Units $737,145 $22,070 $689/Unit Resort Lodging Units $433,735 $21,472 $536/Unit Commercial/Office Uses $18,583,394 $22,073 $1.448/S.F. Industrial/Manufacturing Uses $21,674,517 $23,298 $1.070/S.F. Of note is the fact that Table 6-4 summarizing Schedule 6.3, the investment "investment" (albeit General Plan proportionally deficient) of the current community is slightly greater, (at about 8 %) of the previously exhibited General PIan Build -out Needs -based fees identified in Table 6-3 summarizing Schedule 6.2. Based upon these proportional facts, the adoption of the General Plan Build -out Needs -based fees identified in Schedule 6.2 and summarized in Table 6-3, would be reasonable and equitable. RESULTING DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES The adoption of Schedule 6.2 at the end of this chapter, as summarized in Table 6-3 and based upon as the Storm Drainage Collection System Development Impact Fees would generate approximately $13.0 million in capital revenues with which to construct a portion of the remaining $207.4 million in the storm drainage infrastructure required to complete the system. The City should adopt both the per unit fees, i.e., the dwelling unit fees and the square foot business construction square foot fees and the per acre figures under the column heading titled Cost Distribution per Acre on Schedule 6.2. The former is for application to projects that include a building creating new demand for all infrastructure and the latter for projects merely creating additional runoff (e.g. a parking structure). Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 77 Item 9. - 271 657 HB -406- Chapter 6 Storm Drainage Collection System RECAP OF RECOMMENDED STORM DRAINAGE COLLECTION SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES. • Adopt Schedule 6.2. for the seven basic new land -uses, and; • Adopt the Schedule 6.2, "Cost per Acre" column for construction of parking lots and other private construction causing additional runoff but few other impacts. CHAPTER ENDNOTES 1. Storm drainage pipe below the size of 21 " is almost exclusively used for "local" or tract storm water collection and is thus not included in the equity calculation. In Huntington Beach this amounts to an additional 80,100 linear foot of reinforced concrete pipe that is 18" to 21" and considered to be "local" in nature and thus not included in this calculation. 2. Roughly assumes inlet boxes constructed at 425 linear foot intervals, combination boxes at 750 foot intervals and junction boxes at 300 linear foot intervals. 3. Projects of major importance generally involving the control of large quantities of flood water (over 500 C.F.S.) through numerous cities and unincorporated areas. 4. The projects individual scope and cost estimates have been provided by the City's contractual engineering firm Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, Engineers and Scientists, Irvine, CA 92612-1311. 5. San Bemardino County Hydrology Manual, Williamson and Schmidt, Civil Engineers, Irvine, California, August, 1986, Runoff Index Number 56. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 78 HB -407- Item 9. - 272 rD Schedule 6.1 SD-001 Santa Ana River & Talbert Channel Region (SD Region #1) $23,728,000 SD-002 Coastal and Bolsa Chica Wetlands Region (SD Region #2) $21.527.000 $34,236,000 SD-003 Slater Channel Region (SD Region #3) SD-004 Wintersburg Channel Region (SD Region #4) $28,749,000 $98,549,000 S6-005 Boisa Chica Channel & Harbour Region (SD Region #5) SD-006 Public Works Maintenance Building $705,050 SUB -TOTAL ESTIMATED NEW PROJECT COSTS $207,494,050 LESS: Existing Storm Drainage Impact Fee Fund Balance $0 _Other Revenue Sources Y $0 SUB -TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS $0 Total - Storm Drainage Collection System Capital Project Needs $207,494,050 NOTES: There are no notes. v �o 93 7QMo $22,234,085 $20,171,660 <`370d, $32,080,501 9 $26,938,963 93 i0"r6 $92,344,355 $660,660 $194,430,225 0 OO�ib $0 0 043 .0 $0 a tl0..' $0 93 7Q°4 $194 430 225 6.30% $1,493,915 6.30% $1.355,340 6,30% $2,155,499 6.300k $1,810,037 6.30% $6,204,645 6.30°/ $44,390 r 6.300/ $13,063,625 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 6,30%1 $13,063,825 1=onward o Sc6adule 6.2_ RevenL ost Specialists, L.L.C. Full CA 92831 Schedule 6.2 City of Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report General Plan Build -out Needs -based Development Impact Costs (Fees) Storm Drainage Collection System Detached Dwelling Units(1) 295.00 1,749 M 0,775 228.63 40.98% $5,354,096 $18,149 5.93 $3,061 per Unit Attached Dwelling Units 111.20 5,307 0.810 90.07 16.15% $2,109,274 $18,968 47.72 $397 per Unit Mobile Home Dwelling Units 1.00 9 0.800 0.80 0.14% $18,735 $18,735 9.00 $2,W per Unit Hotel/Motel Lodging Units 18.60 818 0.900 16.74 3.00% $392,020 $21,076 43.98 $479 per Unit Resort Lodging Units 9.30 5315 0.875 8.14 1.46% $190,624 $20,497 57.53 $356 per Unit Commercial/Office Uses 39.80 2,417,000 0.900 35.82 6.42% $838,839 $21,078 60,729 $0.347 perS_F. Industrial/Manufacturing Use 187.00 3,638,000 0,950 177.65 31.85% $4,160,238 $22,247 19,455 $1.144 per S.F TOTAL _ 6&1 90 $3T,85 t0t7.00° .::3,t7,5 Irt'i`Ot1lStttlCrt i7itt d4_1®edStGIrtistl' bstrtfti. t ,. C� r+ (D 00 � o tv J Revenue & Cost Speclallsts, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 4�1 Schedule 6.3 N City of Huntington Beach ---A 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report V' Community Financial Commitment or Equity -based Proportionality Test Fees Storm Drainage Collection System <:. t'roposstllar d t < ,.: Oev�lopedpffiprrlC: df!)r rrrage Factor Storm Dfairrage Run-off Percentage ; of Existing Service Calls Allocation of Infrastructure ^, gquity^ Bis1f76ution of ^Equity" per Acre Avg$ linrts: ar Sgvare reollAcre Currei►t'Flrriit?li Commitment per Unit or Square Foot Acres Unrts Detached Dwelling Units (1) 6,436.00 38,616 0.775 4,987.90 60.070/a $122,325,402 $19,006 6.00 $3,168 per Unit Attached Dwelling Units 1,805.40 36,108 0.810 1,462.37 17.61% $35,863,547 $19,865 20.00 $993 per Unit Mobile Home Dwelling Units 204.60 2,865 0.800 163.68 1.97% $$4,013,573 $19,617 14.00 $1,401 per Unit Hotel/Motel Lodging Units 33.40 1,070 0.900 _ 30.06 0.36% $737,145 $22,070 _ 32.04 $669 per Unit Resort Lodging Units 20.20 809 0.875 17.68 0.21% $433,735 $21,472 40.05 $536 per Unit Commercial/Office Uses 841.90 12,836,000 0.900 757.71 9.13% $18,583,394 $22,073 15,246 $1.448 per S.F. Industrial/Manufacturing Use 930.30 20,261,000 _ 0.950 1 883.78 10.64% $21,674,517 $23,298 21,779 $1.070 pet S.F. TtiTAi < 10,271 $t7 . w -- 8,303.18 1;D 0tJ° $2tl�1,6 ,31 fi TdY€[Il, quity,n Current La1N= EfWtcemont Assets $1'S8,8 313 In Rquftyin's"tflrtirnfirlet:nitect�onSyst2rrtFaciliiies. $45,M. Q,t�0 in equity m storm Drainage�asins . $0 in Existing Storm drA* l":i"lr�— "' f'e' Fund H�i�tts� . Revenu )st Specialists, L.L.C, Fulk CA 92831 Chapter 7 Public Library Facilities and Collection Table 7-5 Establishment of the Library Collection Standard and Cost per Person to Maintain the Standard Library Collection Items 410,594 Current City Service Population 190,377 Collection Items per Resident Standard 2.157 Cost of Library Collection per Collection item $25.00 Collection Items per Resident Standard 2.157 Cost per Additional Resident $53.93 Resulting_ Impact Costs. The combined cost per neNv resident is $402.23, consisting of $348.30 for 0.669 square feet of library space and $53.93 for 2.157 additional collection items. Table 7-6, following, indicates the amount required for pro-rata expansion of the library space per Schedule 7.1. If adopted and imposed on the remaining development, it would collect enough to acquire land for and construct an additional 11,432 square feet of public library space and an additional 36,861 collection items. Table 7-6 Summary of Library Space and Collection Impact Costs Laiid�Use Residents .� -�-pst peg _ YinQ�ct Cash - Detached Dwelling Units 2.913 $402.23 $1,172/Dwellin Attached Dwelling Units 2.257 $402.23 $908/Dwelling Mobile Home Dwelling Units 1 1,8221 $402.23 $733/Dwelling Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 86 HB -415- Item 9. - 280 Chapter 7 Public Library Facilities and Collection RECOMMENDED DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES • Adopt Schedule 7.1 which contains the recommended City Library Facilities and Collection (item) Development Impact Fees and is summarized in Table7-6. • Establish a General Plan square foot standard for Library Facilities square feet per resident and a standard for Collection Items per resident. Chapter Endnotes 1. Based upon the 2011 State of California Department of Finance City population estimate of 190,377. 2. The current population of 190,377 establishes the existing standard. 3. A collection item is generally a book but can also be a CD, magazine subscription, video tape or some other like item with a similar cost and accession cost. 4. Based upon the construction cost of a 30,000 square foot library constructed in Highland, CA at a cost of $11,500,000 and increased by the Engineering News Record construction cost index increase of 14.95% over the 01/06 construction date (or $441.63 per square foot) and land acquisition at a cost of $20 per square foot of land with a FAR (floor area ratio) of 0.20 requiring five square feet of land per square foot of building pad. 06/2010 ENR- CCI = 8805 divided by the 01/06 ENR - CCI of 7660 = 14.95 percent increase. 5. The accession process includes: needs research, ordering, receipt, preparation, entering it into the computer and actual placement on the shelves. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 87 Item 9. - 281 -- HB -416- Schedule 7.1 City of Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Public Library Facilities and Collection Banning Library Central Library Graham Library Main Street Library Oak View Library Existing Square Feet of Library Space Existing library Collection Items Calculation of Existing Standards: Current Population (Residents) S.F. of Library Space/Resident Collection Items/Resident Library Construction/Square Foot 06/2010 Land Acquisition at $20.00/S.F. and 0.25 FAR. Land Acquisition and Construction per Square Foot Cost per Collection Item Cost per Square Foot or Collection Item [Existing City Library Standard(s) Cost of Space per Resident Cost of Collection Item per Resident Library Space Library Collection 2,400 27,637 115,000 314,921 1,200 14,920 4,500 30,429 4,300 22,687 127,400 410,594 190,377 190,377 0.669fk>:<:. 2.157r. $520.63 $520.63 $25.00 0,669 2,157 : $53.93 Type of Density Library Library ? Total i Residential per Dwelling Space Collection Library Dwelling Unit Unit f Component Component Impact Fee Detached Dwelling Unit 2.913 Attached Dwelling Unit 2.257. Mobile Home Dwelling Unit 1.822 $1,015 $157 $1,172 $786 $122 $908 $635 $98 $733 Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. 668 1113 -41 %- Fullertc - "' Item 9. - 282 Chapter 8 Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development (including Open Space) This Chapter summarizes the City's existing inventory of parks and identifies the ratio of park land (and park facilities improvements) per resident allowable under the Quimby Act (§66477 of the Government Code') for residential developments involving the subdivision of land and AB1600 (§66000) for the construction of residential developments not involving the subdivision of land. The existing per capita standard is then utilized to calculate the park dedication requirement for future residential development. EXISTING PARKS AND PARK IMPROVEMENTS SYSTEM Open space notwithstanding, intensive parks and recreational facilities constitute one of the City of City of Huntington Beach's greatest needs both with respect to facilities for current residents and future citizens. The provision of a well -planned park system, with a variation in the size and nature of facilities offered, is an important amenity to residents of any city, the City of City of Huntington Beach included. A mixture of passive and active uses and facilities and programs which appeal to a broad spectrum of potential park and trail users are considered optimal in most urban cities. The City currently has at its disposal (and within general control) some 999.09 acres of park, beach and specialty uses for use by the City's many residents. However, not all of these acres are owned by the City, many are leased or owned by other agencies made available to the City via a joint use agreements with the various school districts or are S.C. E. right-of-way. The current acres dedicated to park use (and owned or under long-term control by the City) can reasonably well serve the City's current needs. However if the number of owned park acres remains static at 778.41 acres, the City may not be able to continue to meet recreational demands in light the probable 9.0 l increase in the City's population. At an attempt to achieve a high level of fairness, the City's owned park acreage will be used as the standard for calculating the park standard and the development impact fee schedule. The figure is a Government Code statute -based calculation and thus does not include other park opportunities in the area such as Harriet Weider Regional Park, which while clearly serving the City residents, are not City -facilities and thus cannot be programmed by the City. The City has a General Plan standard target of 5.0 acres per 1,000 acres per residents and the calculation of target does include the park acres of other agencies (i.e. the regional park and state-owned beach land) within the calculation of that General Plan Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 89 Item 9. - 283 669 HB -418- Chapter 8 Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development target. That is completely acceptable for General Plan issues, and the City does meet that General Plan standard. Future residential development, by increasing the City's population, will impact the City's park system by requiring additional athletic fields, adequate space for various athletic activities and community center space. Given the magnitude of growth projected in this and other reports, the challenge facing the City will be to provide new facilities and park land to serve the recreational needs of these new residents. Without additional park land acquisition and development of currently owned but underutilized park land during the remaining period of private residential development, the City's parks will become overcrowded and overused, with the ultimate result becoming a negative experience for park users. Existing Park Land and Open Space Land. Currently, the City owns (or has long -tern control of) approximately 778.41 acres of traditional park land, about 87.9%(683.9 acres) of it, developed. The entire list of parks and their acreage is identified on Schedule 8.1 at the conclusion of this Chapter with a summary by type in Table 8-1. Central Park is the largest developed park, representing just under a half of the park system acreage and provides the greatest variety of sports and passive uses. Table 8-1 Current Park Total Inventory - - Neighborhood Parks 183.79 129.74 Community/Sports Parks 546.82 470.81 Other (beaches, etc) 268.48 177.86 Total Acres (Owned) 999.09 778.41 City Park Standard. Table 8-2, following, is a comparison of the acreage of parks to the City of Huntington Beach's current population and indicates that the City presently possesses a total standard of 5.248 acres of park land per 1,000 residents, (999.09 park acres—, [190,377 resident's 1,0001, rounded). However as stated previously, the owned acreage will be used to calculate the standard and resulting impact fee. The City presently owns 778.41 acres and thus possesses an owned standard of 4.089 acres of owned park land per 1,000 residents, (778.41 owned park acre's _ [190,377 resident's 1,000], rounded). This is above the benchmark of 3.0 acres per Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 90 - HB -419- Item 9. - 284 Chapter 8 Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development 1,000 persons contained in Section 66477 of the California Government Code relating to dedication of parks. Table 8-2 Calculation of Actual City -owned and Developed Park Acres Standard ------------- fir - Owned Pa Current Park Acres 999.09 778.41 Current City Population 190,377 190,377 Population Stated in Thousands 190.377 190.377 Park Acres per 1,000 Population IE-5.248 4.089 The Quimby Act, to be discussed later, allows a minimum standard of 3.0 acres per thousand resident's even if the City has not attained that standard. However, the park acres owned standard for the City of Huntington Beach, at 4.089 acres per 1,000 resident's, exceeds that minimum standard and thus the Quimby allowable minimum standard of 3.0 acres per 1,000 new residents is irrelevant and the 4.089 acres/1,000 resident's standard will be used for Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development. Though not particularly relevane to the City of Huntington Beach, the Quimby Act has a cap on land dedications required as a part of the subdivision of land of 5.0 acres per thousand (Government Code §66447 (a)(2). Planned Improvements. In addition to the ongoing improvement of the remaining 115.85 acres3 available for increased residential development, the City will need to acquire 70.5 additional park acres, per Table 8-3, and develop these new parks to serve the additional 17,089 residents anticipated to live in City of Huntington Beach at General Plan build -out. [This space left vacant to place the following table on a single page] Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 91 Item 9. - 285 671 HB -420- Chapter 8 Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Table 8-3 Calculation of Required Park Acres per Allowable Standard Future Added Population 17,089 Population Stated in Thousands 17.089 Allowable City of Huntington Beach Park Standardt 4.128 Parks Acres Required to Maintain Standard 70.5 The 70.5 acres could be constructed in any of the following configurations: Mini or "Pocket" Parks - This type is the smallest of the park type designations, usually an acre or less. Mini parks are generally not planned due to higher maintenance costs. They are usually the result of the acquisition of an unusual parcel oftentimes with historical or community significance. Tarbox, Booster, Trinidad or Baily Parks are good examples of this category. Local or Neighborhood Parks - These parks are generally 3.0 to six acres and serve local (walk- in distance) users. Not surprisingly, the City has a number of these parks, roughly forty-nine at an average of about 3.5 acres in size. Neighborhood Parks, per the category title, are intended to serve walk-in populations nearby the park and typically are not highly programmed with City -run activities. Community - These parks, to be functional, are usually closer to ten acres or larger and are designed to meet the needs of the entire community. These needs include youth and adult sports organizations, clubs or associations and large scale community events such as 4' of July celebrations or festivals. Langenbeck, Baca, Bartlett, Carr and Gisler Parks are good examples of a broad -based use community park. Sport Parks - These park, again as titled, are highly infrastructure -developed to meet the active sports needs of both youth and adults. Edison and Greer Parks are good examples of the City's sports parks. The proposed park improvements that could be contained within the roughly 65 needed acres and the existing standard (Table 8-2) are consistent with the City's Park and Recreation Element of the General Plan. The City's 3.785 acres per 1,000 population standard speaks reasonably well for the City as a three -acre per 1,000 population standard is the common minimum, but frequently Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 92 HB -421- Item 9. - 286 Chapter 8 Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development unmet, target of municipalities and recreation and park special districts throughout California. City staff has plans and has identified parcels that would assist help reach the 5.0 acres per 1,000 standard at General Plan build -out. CALCULATION OF PARK DEDICATION STANDARD Unlike the other facilities discussed in this Report, the California Government Code contains specific enabling legislation for the acquisition and development of community and neighborhood parks by a City. This legislation, codified as Section 66477 of the Government Code and known commonly as the 'Quimby Act," establishes criteria for charging new development for park facilities based on specific park standards. This Report will recommend the adoption of Quimby - style park fees over an AB 1600-style development impact fee for developments requiring the subdivision of land and an AB 1600 fee for non subdivided land. Allowable Park Standard As stated earlier, under Section 66477 of the Government Code, the City may charge new residential development based on a standard of 3.0 acres per 1,000 population if the City does not presently possess a ratio of 3.0 acres per 1,000 for the existing population. The Government Code also enables a city to charge development based on a standard higher than 3.0 acres (to a maximum of 5.0 acres) if the City currently exceeds the minimum benchmark ratio of 3.0 acres per 1,000 persons. Schedule 8.1 indicates that the City exceeds that minimum standard (with 3.785 acres/1,000 residents) and may then impose a fee in order to maintain that standard. The law states that "if the amount of existing neighborhood and community park area... exceeds the [3 acres of park area per 1,000 person] limit ... the legislative body may adopt the calculated amount as a higher standard not to exceed 5 acres per 1,000 persons. rt4 Park fees maybe required by the City provided that the City meets certain conditions including: • The amount and location of land to be dedicated or the fees to be paid shall bear a reasonable relationship to the use of the park by the future inhabitants of the subdivision. • The legislative body has adopted a general plan containing a recreational element, and the park and recreational facilities are in accordance with definite principles and standards contained therein. • The city ... shall develop a schedule specifying how, when, and where it will use the land or fees, or both, to develop park or recreational facilities ... Any fees collected under the ordinance shall be committed within five years after the payment of such fees. Once a per capita standard for parks is determined, the cost of residential development's impact on the City's park system can then be computed as follows: Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 93 Item 9. - 287 6is HB -422- Chapter 8 Park .Carol Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Park -land Acquisition Costs. Land costs will vary significantly from one park to another. The park land to be acquired must be suitable for park construction and is somewhat conservatively estimated at approximately $871,200 per acre (or $20.00/square foot) which has been used in the park development impact fee calculation, as a default ark development impact fee for ordinary residential dwelling development. This is consistent with the cost of recent development for detached dwelling development in the more northerly areas of the City of Huntington Beach area. However, the use of this $20.00 per square foot figure could be criticized if a developer can show that the cost of the residential land they are developing is currently valued at less than the $871,200/acre figure. Conversely the City should retain the ability to increase this impact fee in areas where the cost of land exceeds the $20.00 per square foot figure. The fee recommendation at the end of the Chapter will recognize this need for flexibility. Park Development Costs. Park development costs are based upon the very recent construction of Schedule 8.3, a current schedule of common park costs and typical improvements by type of park. Schedule 8.2 identifies the three types parks' that the City will likely construct over General Plan build -out' and the costs of the types and numbers of improvements generally included in each of the following and are summarized from Schedule 8.2, identifies the factors in the average costs to develop an acre of park land for the three types, based on figures which are consistent with the probable improvements and costs to build similar parks incurred by other communities. For cost estimate purposes, roughly forty-five acres of Central Park has been identified as higher cost sports park acres with the remainder as Community Park. Sixty acres of beach land has been categorized as neighborhood park due to the nature of the more limited improvement costs. The table also indicates the three major types of parks. The existing 834.06 developed park acres' cost the City an estimated $258,698,242 construct as parks for an average construction cost of $310.168 per acre. Table 8-4 Average Park Construction Cost per Acre Type of- Park Park - . Acres =' Cost/ Acre Average , Construction - -Cost Neighborhood/Mini Park 271.01 $223,441 $60,559,816 .Community Park 229.15 $289,296 $66,292,242 Sports/Regional Park 333.90 $394,884 $131,851,622 Total Cost = $258,698,242 Total Acres 834.06 = = 834.06 Cost/Acre rounded = - - - $310 168 Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 94 674 Hs -423- Item 9. - 288 Chapter 8 Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development The $310,168/acre is then increased by 15 % to $356,693 to account for the park architectural costs and 24% to $442,299/acre to account for project administration, plan check, engineering, inspection and materials testing costs. Lastly, the $422,299 per acre figure is increased by 15 % to $508,644 for a typical park project contingency. Schedule 8.2 shows this in numeric detail. Schedule 8.3 details the average park construction cost by type of park. The Existing Park Community Center Inventgi ,L The City has a number of facilities dedicated for use as public uses facilities (as opposed to staff facilities). The existing 118,020 square feet of Community Use Facilities are identified in Table 8-5, following. Table 8-5 Inventory of Existing Park Community Use Facilities C61n1u1nity Use facility Square Feet= Beach Public Service Center 2,561 City Gymnasium and Pool Facility 23,600 Edison Community Center 11,065 Harbor View Clubhouse 2,203 Huntington Beach Municipal Art Center 11,092 Huntington Beach Youth Shelter 5,600 Junior Lifeguard Headquarters 5,922 Lake Park Clubhouse 3,000 Lake View Clubhouse 2,000 LeBard Clubhouse 1,000 Murdy Community Center 11,000 Newland Barn 6,000 Newland House Museum 2,750 Oak View Community Center 10,000 Rodgers Senior Center 14,000 Seniors Outreach Center 2,700 Shipley Nature Center Interpretive Building 1,863 Terry Park Community Center 1,664 Total Community Use Facilities Square Feet 118,020 Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 95 Item 9. - 289 Gi5 HB -4224- Chapter 8 Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development The City has 118,020 public use community center square feet as identified in Table 8-5 previous. When divided by the City's 849.58 acres of developed park land the result indicates an average of 138.92 square feet of community center per acre of developed park. At the development cost of $480.00 per square foot of community center, there is a cost of $66,680 for the 138.92 average square feet of public uses facilities per acre of existing developed park (138.92 square feet multiplied by the $480 per square foot of community center construction). The $66,680 represents the future cost of maintaining the existing square feet of community center per acre of park, and as a result, per capita. Average Park Acquisition and Development Cost per Capita. The combined park acquisition and development cost is $1,446,524 per acre ($871,200/acre for acquisition, $508,644 per acre for development and $77,780 for community center space acquisition). If the City were to charge development for the maximum allowable amount of park acreage as allowed in the Quimby Act and as recommended here, then the City would need to acquire 4.128 acres of new park land for every potential 1,000 new residents to the City. The 4,128 acres of land acquisition and park and community center improvements per 1,000 persons would be $6,130,008 or about 6,130.01 per new resident. Table 8-6 and Schedule 8.1 calculates the cost, per type of residential dwelling, to develop 4.089 acres, which represents the required park land cost for 1,000 persons. Table 8-6 Summary of Quimby Park/AB1600 Development Impact Fees for Residential Dwelling Construction _. _ arsons per P�e-�ur �_Innpacf �- esidentafil.and.e -=we71Per_UntEL__ Detached Dwelling Units 2.913 $6,130.01 $17,857 Attached Dwelling Units 2.257 $6,130.01 $13,385 Mobile Home Dwellin Units J1 1.822 1 $6,130.01 1 $11,169 The development impact fees for residential detached dwelling development involving the subdivision of land, as identified in Table 8-6, should be adopted under the auspices of the Quimby Act. The development impact fees for residential dwelling units not requiring the subdivision of a parcel, will need to be adopted as an AB 1600-supported development impact fee. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 96 676 HB -425- Item 9. - 290 Chapter 8 Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Open Space Fees for Business Uses. Imagine a community without any (or very little) park or open space. There a small number of such communities in the greater Los Angeles area. All private development benefits from the acquisition of land that is never developed, and exists, at a minimum, as a buffer from all other businesses. Schedule 8.4 identifies the cost for park land (as open space) for the business type land -uses. Again, the City owns 778.4 acres of park space which at a minimum acts as open space for all land uses. There are 10,271.8 acres of privately held developed land within the City's limits. As a result there is 0.0758 acres of park/open space for each developed privately held acre. The 0.0758 acres of open space per privately held acre is the recommended standard to be applied to the development of vacant parcels zoned for the business uses of commercial and resort lodging, commercial/office and industrial/manufacturing uses. The open space land acquisition cost will be limited to 25 % of the $20.00 per square foot (or $871,200 per acre) acquisition cost based upon the premise that business use benefits largely from the open space component and but does not require the benefits of developed parks and that open space land acquisition costs are less than land appropriate for parks. The cost to acquire that 0.0578 acre of park land would be $16,605. Again the cost is limited to only open space land acquisition, but does not include the development component of that land as a park. That will fall to the developers of residentially zoned land that will generate park users (residents). Business acres benefit from the parks as open areas that make the City a desirable location for that business. The $300,000 per acre of development will be divided by the varying units from the three differing types of business uses in Table 8-7. Schedule 8.5 is summarized in Table 8-7 following. Table 8-7 Cost Calculation for Business Uses Residential) aad _ _ Uns�r S F per_, Cos1fAcropgr o�-0pen eye& -7m _ i0ire IN Commercial Lodging Unit 36 $16,505 $458 Resort Lo4ging Unit 46 $16,505 $359 Commercial/Office Square Feet 17,300 $16,505 $0.954 Industrial Square Feet 21,390 $16,505 $0.772 Note: A lodging unit is defused as keyed room. Land Acquisition Cost Adjustment Challenge. As mentioned previously, the use of $871,200/acre as the default park land acquisition cost is based upon the assumption that parks acreage would likely be close in proximity and thus similar in cost to residential land value of the private project the park is intended to serve. However, if the developer or contractor of a home can provide Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 97 Item 9. - 291 C77 HB -426- Chapter 8 Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development evidence (acceptable to the City), in the form of a recent purchase agreement or appraisal of the property they will be developing that the current land value is worth less than the $871,200/acre (or a $20.00/square foot), the development impact fee could be adjusted accordingly by placing the actual cost of land acquisition into the Schedule 8.1 calculation. Again, if the City wishes to adopt such an adjustment, the terms under which the challenge may be made and proved should be included in the Development Impact Fee Ordinance. Similarly, if a development is closer to the beach area and land costs are higher, the City should be able to impose a park development impact fee consistent with the local land acquisition costs. Schedule 8.1 shows this calculation. RECAP OF RECOMMENDED PARK LAND ACQUISITION AND PARK FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES. • Schedule 8.1 contains the maximum Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fees to be imposed upon residential development based upon the facts presented in this Chapter for default or standard residential developments. • Schedule 8.4 contains the maximum Park/Open Space Land Acquisition Impact Fees to be imposed upon business development based upon the facts presented in this Chapter. CHAPTER ENDNOTES Adoption of a Quimby Act fee requires a Park "plan". 2. The figure has relevance for municipalities that have large tracts of land available for subdivisions in the thousands or more. 3. The Quimby Act does allow use of revenues raised by the adoption of a Quimby Act Park Impact Fee to be used for rehabilitation of existing parks. 4. California Government Code, Title 7, Division 2, Section 66477 (b). 5. Totaling the roughly 64.7 acres of park land acquisition and development that could be expected to be financed by imposing the proposed development impact fees over General Plan build -out. 6. Mini parks are not included in the mix as they are very costly to construct on a per acre cost and generally are expensive maintenance factors. Mini parks are rarely planned for but generally occur as a result of a land donation or as the recognition of a historical site. 7.Based upon the 1,006.58 acres of parkland available, less the 45.01 acre Weider County Regional Park and the 127.51 un improved park acres of City Parks. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 98 678 HB -427- Item 9. - 292 Schedule 8.1 City of Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Park Quimby Fee for Dwellings on a Sub -divided AB1600 Fee for Dwelling on Non -subdivided and Nexus Report Parcel, and; Parcels . FPark =Size City Owned Parkland Developed Rarktand Lake Park 4.75 0.00 4.75 Lake View Park 2.16 2.16- 2.16 Lamb Park 2.60 2.60 0.00 Lambert Park 3.50 3.50 3.50 Langenbeck Park 17.02 9.24 17.02 Lark View Park 3.65 0.00 3.65 LeBard Park 4.99 3.01 4.99 Manning Park 2.46 2.46 2.46 Marina Park 9.34 9.34 9.34 Marine View Park 2.96 0.00 2.96 McCallen Park 5.84 5.84 5.84 Meadowlark Golf Course 98.00 98.00 98.00 Moffett Park 2.38 2.38 2.38 Murdy Park 16.04 16.04 16.04 Newland Park I 2.94 2.94 2.94 Oak View Center Park 1.31 0.00 1.31 Weider Regional (County -owned) s 45.01 0.00 23.01 Pattinson Park 3.51 3.51 3.51 Perry Park 1.88 1.88 1.88 Pleasant View Park i 2.17 0.00 2.17 Prince Park 0.22 1.41 0.22 0.22 Robinwood Park 0.00 1.41 Rodgers Senior Center Site 2,01 2.37 2.01 2.01 Schroeder Park 0.00 2.37 Seabridge Park J 3.91 3.91 3.91 Seeley Paris 3.37 3.37 3.37 Sowers Park 2.65 2.65 2.65 Sun View Park 2.45 0.00 2.45 Talbert Park 5.44 5.44 5.44 Tarbox Park 0.44 0.44 0.44 Terry Park 4.81 4.81 4.81 Triangle Park 1.11 1.11 1.11 Trinidad Park 0.75 0.75 0.75 Wardlow Park 8.36 8.36 8.36 Wieder Park 4.80 4.80 1 4.80 Worthy Community Park 7.00 7.00 1 7.00 Total Acres (Owned/Developed) 999.09 778.41 849.58 Current Population 190,377 190,377 190,377 Populationfl , 000 190.38 190.38 190.38 Current Standard 5.248 4.089 ; 4.463 99 Item 9. - 293!k Cosh Specialists, L.L.C. HB -428- Fullerton, 92831 CA Schedule 8.1 City of Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Park Quimby Fee for Dwellings on a Sub -divided Parcel, and; AB1600 Fee for Dwelling on Non -subdivided Parcels Acres/1,000 Population Standard Quimby Maximum Allowable Acquisition Cost per Acre (1) Construction Cost per Acre (2) Community Center Construction Total Component Cost Cost X Standard Population Served by Standard Cost per Resident Detached Dwelling Units 2.913 Attached Dwelling Units 2.257 Mobile Home Dwelling Units 1.822 Size 5.248 5.000 4.089 4.089 $871, 200 $871 ,200 $3, 562, 337 1,000.0 $3,562.34 4.463 4.463 $508,644 $66, 680 $575,324 $2,567,671 1,000 0 $2,567.67 1. Current estimate of $20.00 per acre acquisition cost for land consistent with park use. 2. See Schedule 9.3 for typical park amenity construction cost details. Tvtaf Fee I?er Ferson $6,130.01 =11 Revenue & Coss Specialists, L.L.C. HB -429- Fullert Item 9. - 294 Schedule 8.2 City of Huntington Beach Park Site Inventory Improvement Cost Residential Park Development Impact Fee Calculation of Average Park Acre Construction Cost Prince Paris French Park Tarbox Park ,Davenport Beach Humbolt Beach Park City Gym/Pool Site Finley Park Bailey Park Trinidad Park Booster Park Triangle Park Banning/Magnolia Park Oak View Center Park Robinwood Park Franklin Park Perry Park Rodgers Senior Center Site Helme Park Bauer Park _ Lake View Park _ Pleasant View Park Drew Park Circle View Park Schroeder Park Bushard Park Moffett Park Sun View Park _ Manning Park _ Burke Park _ Arevelos Park Lamb Park Sowers Park Eader Park Hawes Park Bolsa View Park College View Park Conrad Park Clegg -Stacey Park Golden View Park Newland Park Haven View Park Marine View Park Glen View Park Seeley Park Lambert Park Park l I average Gost Size per Ac.(a 0,22 0.33 0.44 0.46 0.48 0.50 0.56 0.59 0.75 0.85 1.11 0.00 1.31 1.41 1.52 1.88 2.01 2.02 2.04 2,16 2,17 2.28 2.31 2.37 2.38 2.38 2.45 2.46 2.50 2.58 0.00 2.65 2.68 2.68 2.70 2.70 2.71 2.80 2.81 2.94 2.95 2.96 3.02 3.37 3.50 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $ 223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 Total `Cost for ParK $49,167 $73,736 $98,314 $102,783 $107,252 $11 1 ,721 $125,127 $131,830 $167, 581 $189,925 $248,020 $0 $292,708 $315,052 $339,631 $420,070 $449,117 $451,351 $455,820 $482,633 $484,868 $509,446 $516,149 $529,556 $531,790 $531,790 $547,431 $549,665 $558,603 5576,478 $0 $592,119 $598, 823 $598,823 $603,291 $603,291 $605 , 526 $625,636 $627,870 $656, 917 $659,152 $661,386 $674,793 $752,997 $782. 044 101 Item 9. - 295& Cost specialists, L.L.C. HB -430- Fullerton, 92831 CA Schedule 8.2 City of Huntington Beach Park Site Inventory Improvement Cost Residential Park Development Impact Fee Calculation of Average Park Acre Construction Cost Park A�rerage GosiE TotalCost Size per Acre for Pais Pat nson Park 3.51 3.52 3.61 $223,441 Farquhar Park i $223,441 Hope View Park $223,441 _ Lark View Park 3.65 $223,441 Seabridge Park 3.91 4.02 $223,441 Harbour View Park $223,441 Green Park 4.04 $223,441 Lake Park 4.75 3 $223,441 Wieder Park _ 4.80 $223,441 'Terry Park 4.81 $223,441 LeBard Park 4.99 $223,441 Talbert Park 5.44 $223,441 McCallen Park 5.84 $223,441 Discovery Well Park , 6.60 $223,441 Gibbs Park 6.83 $223,441 Wardlow Park 8.36 ; $223,441 Marina Park 9.34 $223,441 , Meadowlark Golf Course 98.00 $223,441 Carr Park 10.72 $289,296 Irby Park 2.91 $289,296 Gisler Park 11.67 $289,296 Baca Park i 14.35 $289,296 Langenbeck Park 17.02 $289,296 Bluff Top Park Bartlett Park Beach, City -leased 19.66 2.00 ` $289,296 . i $289,296 90.62 $289,296 Beach, City -owned I 60.20 7.00 10.44 $289,296 Worthy Park - Greer park Murdy Park Edison Paris $394,884 $394,884 16.04 $394,884 47.18 $394,894 lHuntington Central Park 1 253.24J $394,884 Total 834,06 Total Park Acres Average Construction Cost/Acre Community Input, Design, Engineering Sub -total Park Construction Cost Project Administation, Soils<Materials Testing, etc. Sub -total Park Construction Cost Contingency Total Park Construction Cost $784,279 $786,513 $806,623 $815,561 $873,655 $898,234 $902,703 $1,061,346 $1,072,518 $1,074,752 $1,114,972 $1,215,520 $1,304,897 $1,474,712 $1,526,104 $1,867,969 $2,086,941 $21,897,243 $3,101, 256 $841,852 $3,376,088 $4,151,402 $4,923,823 $5,687,565 $578,593 i $26,216,029 $17,415,636 $2.764,185 $4,122, 584 $6,333,932 $181630,607 $100,000,314 $258,698,680 834.06 $310,168 115.00% $356, 693 124.00% $442,299 115.00% $508,644 102 Revenue & Cost Specialists, L, L.C_ HB -43 1 - Fullert Item 9. - 296 Schedule 8.3 City of Huntington Reach Development Impact Fee Calculation Report Park Improvement Cost Estimates, by Type of Park Unit host, Installed Pub Imps, Road/curb, gutter, etc. $200 Linear Foot Lg Pk Grading/Irrigation/Turf $37,500 Acre Sm Pk Grading/irrigation/Turf $42,750 Acre Plant Material; Trees-5, 24 gallon box/acre i $149 Each Trees-15, 15 gallon/acre $290 Each Shrubs-10, five gallon $30 Each Shrubs-30, one gallon $8 Each Play apparatus Curbing, 450' per large $41.30 Linear Foot Curbing, 225' per small $41 .30 Linear Foot Play equipment - large $123750 Lot Play equipment - medium $99.000 Lot _ Play equipment - small $67,500 Lot Sand/Other Surfacing $5,775 Lot Buildings; Restroom - Small $132,000 Each Restroom - Large $181,500 Each Eaumment storace facility 1 S99 000 Fach Combined Restroom/Concession $297,000 Each Parking Lot 4" A.C. W/6" Rock base $8.30 Square foot V-gutter $13.20 S990 $330 Linear Foot Each Each _ Drain Inlet Drain Inlet connector Storm drain line $19.80 Linear Foot_ Drive approach $2,970 Each Perimeter curbing $16.50 Linear Foot Striping $0.50 Linear Foot Lighting $2,970 Each Lot signage_ $330 Lot Entrance $4,950 Lot Curb and Gutter S15,27 Linear Foot Storm Drainage Facilities Inlets _ $1 ,320 Each Connections $2,145 Each Lateral (to arterial) $82.50 Linear Foot Sewer Facilities Connection to arterial $4,125 Lot Line in street Line in park $107.30 $24.80 Linear Foot Linear Foot :5 Acre Neighbo�lttt(5i� . _ . 1,040 $208,000 0 $0 5 $213,750 60 ( $8, 940 30 $8,700 40 $1,200 . 120 $960 0 $0 225 $9,293 0 $0 1 $99,000 0 $0 1 $5,775 1 1 $132,000 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 12,000 $99,600 300 $3,960 1 $990 1 $330 300 $5,940 1 $2,970 490 ; $8,085 400 $200 2 $5,940 1 $330 1 _ $4,950 3,780 $57,721 2 $2,640 2 $4, 290 45 $3,713 1 $4,125 29 $3,112 125 j $3,100 20 :� t'iO�lidt`ttl hty part( 2,704 $540,800 15 $562,500 0 $0 225 $33,525 75 $21,750 150 $4,500 450 $3,600 450 $18,585 225 $9,293 1 $123,750 0 $0 2 $135,000 3 $17,325 1 $132,000 1 $181,500 ' 0 $0 1 $297,000 $332,t,_ . 40,000 800 $10,560 2 $1,980 2 $660 200 $3,960 4 $11,880 800 $13,200 ' 1,300 _ $650 18 , $53,460 3 $990 3 $14,850 3,232 $49,353 4 $5,280 4 $8,580 80 $6,600 1 $4,125 80 $8,584 1,500 $37,200 103 Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 Item 9. - 297 HB -4)L'- Schedule 8.3 City of Huntington Beach Development Impact Fee Calculation Report -irk Improvement Cost Estimates, by Type of Park Unit Cost, !IirtSt118Gf ;Fire Hydrant $4,950 Each Street Lights Standards $2,475 Each i Duct work/wiring $1,568 Each Water Facilities 3" metered service T $4,125 Each Backflow device $4,125 Each Line in street $19.80 Linear Foot Water fountains $1,155 Each Fountain lines in park $19.80 Linear Foot Benches[Tables Tables, cement pads $2,475 Each Individual grills $825 Each Benches, cement pads $908 Each Bleachers $5,775 Each _ Large Covered Picnic Area (lot) $123,750 Each Individual Covered Picnic Pad $24,750 Each User Electrical Service park $16,500 Each Electrical Service per Area $2,063 Each Game Courts T lasketball Courts $66,000 Each Basketball Court Lighting $57,750 Each { Fenced Tennis Courts $99,000 Each i Tennis Court Lighting $57,750 Each Baseball Field - Competitive $82,500 Each Balifield Lighting $412,500 Per two fields Baseball Field - Recreational $24,750 Each Pedestrian Walkway 5' Wide $22.28 Linear Foot 6' Wide $28.88 Linear Foot i 9' Wide $37.13 Linear Foot Miscellaneous Flatwork $6.20 Linear Foot Small Park Signage $4,538 Lot Large Park Signage $24,750 Lot Bike Rack/Pad $2,890 Each Natural Element Improvement (Lake, e $825,000 Each (Small Concrete Stage $41 ,250 Each 'Small Ampitheater stage only, graded $82,500 Each Large Ampitheater with bowl 1$247,500 Each Total Cost Total Acres Average Cost per Acre 1 $4,950 3 $7,425 3 $4,704 i 1 $4,125 1 $4,125 1,320 $26,136 1 $1,155 200 $3,960 4 $9,900 2 $1,650 4 $3, 632 j 0 $0 0 $0 1 $24,750 0 $0 1 $2,063 $0 1.0 $66,000 0 $0 0 . $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 1 $24,750 500 $11,140 I 100 $2,888 100 $3,713 500 j $3,100 1 $4,538 0 $0 1 $2,890 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 1,117, 206 <; $223 441 2� AGiQ �Oril►r1u[iily #}C 6 $29,700 20 $49,500 12 $18,816 1 $4,125 1 $4,125 120 $2,376 8 $9,240 11000 $19,800 60 $148,500 30 $24,750 30 $27,240 0 $0 2 $247,500 10 $247,500 1 $16,500 6 $12,378 $0 1 $66,000 0 $0 2 $198.000 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 6 $148,500 2,000 $44,560 500 $14,440 500 $18,565 8,500 $52,700 0 $0 1 $24,750 6 $17,340 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 1 $247,500 vi> :' : :>>. $4, 339,444 15 s.: 104 Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. 684 HB -433- Fullerton, Item 9. - 298 Schedule 8.3 City of Huntington Beach Development Impact Fee Calculation Report Park Improvement Cost Estimates, by Type of Park Urtit'06&, Installed Pub Imps, Road/curb, gutter, etc. $200 Linear Foot Lg Pk Grading/Irrigation/Turf $37,500 Acre Sm Pk Grading/]rrigation/Turf $42,750 Acre Plant Material: Trees-5, 24 gallon box/acre $149 Each Trees-15, 15 galloniacre $290 Each Shrubs-10, five gallon $30 Each Shrubs-30, one gallon $8 Each Play apparatus Curbing, 450' per large $41.30 Linear Foot Curbing, 225' per small $41.30 Linear Foot Play equipment - large $123,750 Lot Play equipment - medium $99,000 Lot Play equipment - small $67,500 Lot Sand/Other Surfacing $5,775 Lot Buildings: Restroom - Small $132,000 Each Restroom - Large $181 ,500 Each Equipment storage facility $99,000 Each Combined Restroom/Concession $297,000 Each Parking Lot 4" A.C. W/6" Rock base $8.30 Square foot--] ' V-gutter $13.20 Linear Foot Drain Inlet $990 $330 Each Each Drain Inlet connector Storm drain line $19.80 Linear Foot Drive approach $2,970 Each Perimeter curbing $16.50 Linear Foot Striping S0.50 Linear Foot Lighting j $2,970 Each Lot signage $330 Lot Entrance $4,950 Lot ;Curb and Gutter $15.27 Linear Foot Storm Drainage Facilities { Inlets $1,320 Each Connections $2,145 Each Lateral (to arterial) $82.50 Linear Foot Sewer Facilities Connection to arterial S4,1_25 Lot Line in street $107.30 Linear Foot ! Line in park $24.80 Linear Foot 2t ;'Acre SoOR P7W 2,704 $540,800 20 $750,000 0 $0 150 $22,350 50 $14,500 100 $3,000 300 $2,400 450 $18,585 225 $9,293 0 $0 1 $99,000 2 $135,000 3 $17,325 1 $132,000 1 $181,500 1 $99,000 2 $594,000 40,000 $332,000 j 800 $10,560 2 $1,980 2 $660 200 $3,960 4 $11,880 800 $13,200 1,300 $650 18 $53,460 3 $990 3 $14,850 1,664 $25,409 4 $5,280 4 $8,580 80 $6,600 1 $4,125 80 S8,584 1,500 $37,200 105 - Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 Item 9. - 299 HB -434- Schedule 8.3 City of Huntington Beach Development Impact Fee Calculation Report "qrk Improvement Cost Estimates, by Type of Park F_Unit;Cost, I StagW7 `r'Oo404rk Fire Hydrant $4,950 Each Street Lights Y Standards $2,475 Each Duct work/wiring $1,568 Each Water Facilities 3" metered service $4,125 Each Backflow device $4,125 Each Line in street $19.80 Linear Foot Water fountains $1,155 Each Fountain lines in park $19.80 Linear Foot Benches/Tables Tables, cement pads $2,475 Each Individual grills $825 Each Benches, cement pads $908 Each Bleachers $5,775 Each Large Covered Picnic Area (lot) ' $123,750 Each Individual Covered Picnic Pad $24,750 Each User Electrical Service park Electrical Service per Area $16,500 Each $2,063 Each Game Courts '3asketball Courts $66,000 Each Basketball Court Lighting $57,750 Each Fenced Tennis Courts $99,000 Each Tennis Court Lighting $57,750 Each Baseball Field - Competitive I $82,500 Each Ballfield Lighting $412,500 Per two fields Baseball Field - Recreational i $24,750 Each Pedestrian Walkway 5' Wide $22.28 Linear Foot 6' Wide $28.88 Linear Foot 9' Wide $37.13 Linear Foot Miscellaneous Flatwork $6.20 Linear Foot Small Park Signage ' $4,538 Lot _ Large Park Signage $24,750 Lot Bike Rack/Pad Natural Element Improvement (Lake, a Small Concrete Stage $2,890 Each $825,000 Each $41,250 Each Small Ampit_heater stage only, graded $82,500 Each Large Ampitheater with bowl $247,500 Each 1 $4,950 20 $49,500 5 $7,840 1 $4,125 1 $4,125 120 $2,376 8 $9,240 1,000 $19,800 30 $74,250 10 $8,250 15 $13,620 8 $46,200 0 $0 4 $99,000 1 $16,500 4 $8,252 �- $0 3 $198,000I 8 $462,000 8 $792,000 8 $462,000 6 $660,000 4 $1,650,000 0 $0 1,000 $22,280 250 $7,220 250 $9,283 4,000 $24,800 0 $0 1 - $24,750 6 $17,340 0 $0 1 $41,250 0 $o 0 $o Total Cost $7,897,671 Total Acres 20.00 Average Cost per Acre $394,884 106 Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, 686 HB _�;_ Item 9. - 300 Schedule 8.4 City of Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Open Space Land Acquisition for Business Uses Land Acquisition Development Impact Fee Calculation Total City -owned Park/Open Space Acres Current City-wide Privately Developed Acres Current Open Space Standard per Developed Acre Acres/Developed Acre Standard Acquisition Cost per Acre Cost X Open Space Standard Open Space Land Value Adjusted Land Cost pOr ire Commercial Lodging Keyed Units 36 Resort Lodging Keyed Units 46 Commercial Acres (in Square Feet) 17,300 Industrial Uses (in Square Feet) 21,390 778.4 10, 271.8 0.0756 0.0758 $871,200 $66,037 25.00%; $16,509.24 Opert Space Acquisition $459 per Keyed Unit $359 per Keyed Unit $0.954 per Square Foot $0.772 per Square Foot 107 Item 9. - 301'venu e& Cost Specialists, L.L.C. HB -436- Fullerton, 92831 CA APPENDIX A Expanded Land -use Database HB -437- Item 9. - 302 City of Hunragton Beach Total -: Land U Database Detached Dwelling Units (1) Attached Dwelling Units Mobile Home Dwelling Units (2) Hotel/Motel Lodging Units Resort Lodging Units Commercial/Office Uses IndustriaUManufacturing Uses F Total - City Limits Private Residences Commercial Lodging Rooms Business Square Feet existing Cott.pnrty as Curr t'l nby.N p d Detached Dwelling Units (1) Attached Dwelling Units Mobile Home Dwelling Units (2) Hotel/Motel Lodging Units Resort Lodging Units Commercial/Office Uses IndustriaUManufacturing Uses Existing Community Additional Units from Intensification of Existir iJses Detached Dwelling Units (1) !Attached Dwelling Units Mobile Home Dwelling Units (2) Hotel/Motel Lodging Units Resort Lodging Units Commercial/Office Uses Industrial/Manufacturing Uses Redeveloped IS pecific Plan.A Beach and Ec#ingef Detached Dwelling Units (1) Attached Dwelling Units Mobile Home Dwelling Units (2) Hotel/Motel Lodging Units Resort Lodging Units Commercial/Office Uses Industrial/Manufacturing Uses Sub -total Specific Plan A i3ep Net Increase Total }tBS.Cfi tnfCs. Acres # of ljnits Acres #f Units 6,436.0 38,616 295.00 1,749 6,731.00 40,365 1,805.4 36,108 1 111.20 5,307 1,916.60 41,41 S 204.6 2,865 1.00 9 205.60 52.00 2,8 1,888 33.4 1,070 18.60 818 20.2 609 9.30 535 29.50 1,344 841.9 12,836,000 ! 39.80 2,417,000 881.70 15,253,000 930.3 20,261 ,000 187.00 3,638,000 1,117.30 23,899,000 ! 10,271.8 i - 661.90 ---- i E�0,933.70 ----- 8,446.0 77,589 407.2 7,065 8,853.2 84,654 53.6 1,879 27.9 1,353 81.5 3,232 1,772.2 33,097,000 226.8 6,055,000 1,999.0 39,152,000 beveloped To :Be Developed . fetal Acres of Unit Acres # of iJnits Acres # Of Units 6,436.0 38 61 334.0 183 ; 6,470.00 38,799 1,805.4 36,108 15.0 159 1,820.40 36,267 204.6 2.865 1.0 9 205.60 2,874 33.4 1,070 1 0.0 0 33.40 1,070 20.2 : 809 3.4 300 23.60 1,109 841.9 12,836,000 4.5 69,200 846.40 12,905,200 930.3 20,261,000 44.0 958,320 974.30 21,219,320 [-10, 771.8 ----- 101.90 ----- 1 10,373.70 1 -- _ Developed lrrtertst�! aRedevelo d Total Acres j # of Units AcFs ' j # of Units: j Acres 0.0 0 ; 261.0 1,566 261.00 1,566 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.00 0 0.0 a 0.0 0 0.00 0 0.0 1 0 14.6 468 14.60 468 0.0 1 0 0.0 0 0.00 0 0.0 0 106.2 2,313,817 106.20 2,313,817 0.0 0 143.0 2,679,680 143.00 2,679,680 0.0 ----- F775R80 -----F 524.80 ---- Developed I�t.... fiedlRedeveioped : �Total: Acres # of Units Ares # of Units Agms � #'flf unit 0.0 0 0.0 a 1 0.00 0 0.0 0 80.0 4,500 80.00 4,500 0.0 0 0.0 a 0.00 0 0.0 0 4.0 350 4.00 350 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.00 0 0.0 0 37.0 850,400 37.00 109850, 0.0 o 0.0 , 0 0.00 u 0.0 ----- I IF 121.00 ----- 121.00 --- Item 9. - 303 HB -43,,- Specific % lfi<'l� DevetoPQ . . Downtown l Acres Detached Dwelling Units (1) ached Dwelling Units Mobile Home Dwelling Units (2) Hotel/Motel Lodging Units iResort Lodging Units Commercial/Office Uses Industrial/Manufacturing Uses Sub -total Specific Plan B { Specific PII"A Removal Detached Dwelling Units (1) Attached Dwelling Units Mobile Home Dwelling Units (2) Hotel/Motel Lodging Units Resort Lodging Units CommerciaVOffice Uses Industrial/Manufacturing Uses Sub -total Specific Plan A 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 16.2 648 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 ; 0 5.9 235 0.0 0 13.1 398,583 0.0 0 0.0 a Acres xrf:nrts 0.00 0 16.20 648 0.00 0 0.00 0 5.90 235 13.10 398,583 0.00 0 0.0 ----- 35.20 - -�1 35.20 1 ----- Developed of Units 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 ----- 1 ]ntonsifled/Redevelo p ed Tlztat <. Acres # of Units Acres of: Units 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 (121.0) (1,215,00 0.0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 (121.00) (1,215,000) 0.00 0 (121.00) ----- (121.00) ----- TES: ). Only 34 of the 295 acres are vacant lots. The remaining 261 acres represents acres for the addition of 1,566 detached dwelling units in areas already developed such as a lot split of a larger parcel parcel with an existing detached dwelling units. (2). The inclusion of one acre of Mobile (or modular) Home Dwelling Units (in parks) Is to establish such a fee and does not imply that that the City anticipates such a private proposal. (3). The 35.2 acres is not intended to suggest there Is 35.2 acres of vacant acres in the downtown area, The 35.2 acres is the result of anticipating 648 additional units at roughly 40 units per acre. 110 Hs -439- Item 9. - 304 ^A? 1 a y ` - V-077 f f ' 71 W_'; 1 . Printed by: 0602 Petrtda SalBsperaon: Garrdelo Apr 19. 2012. 11:32 am.. f` i�OH s 60, � k" Mom: Ad p 34959143 i F (714) 536-5227 City Of Huntington Beach (Parent) PO Box 784 Huntington Beac, CA 92648 C000070479 City Of Huntington Beach -Clerk's O Patty Esparza (714)374-1557 `d8t8 04-26-12 1 z 140.340; iSt dSiB 25-03-12 �Ye 14.00 TCN Inch' � &Legal Huntington Beach r q> Liner 7`diCi7i by 0602 Patricia Gamino _ . 13CN>0 -(Legal Notices x z r� $ 213.50 P- TCN HBI an, a 8 jiTIC $ 273.50 Ad Copy: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCR OF THE CITY Of HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday, May 7, 2012. at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following : ADOPTION OF DEVEL- OPMENT IMPACT FEES RESOLUTION AND ADOPTION OF ORDI- NANCES ESTABLISHING CHAPTERS OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE (HBMC) REGARDING DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES (Traffic, Drainage, Library, Low Enforce- ment, Fire Suppression, Meeting Facilities, Parkland and General Provisions): The City Council will consider the adoption of a fee reso- lution modifying the Fair Share Traffic Impact fee (HBMC 17.65), the Drainage fee (HBMC 17.78), the Library Development fee (HBMC 17.67) and the adoption of the nexus report and a comprehensive Master Facilities Plan. In addi- tion, the City Council will consider the adoption of ordinances establishing HBMC chapters; Library Development Fee (HBMC 17,67), General Provi- sions for Development Impact Fees (HBMC 17.73), Fire Suppression Facilities Fee (HBMC 17.74), Law Enforce- ment Facilities Fee (HBMC 17.75), Park Land/Open Space Ac- quisition Impact Fee (HBMC 17.76), Public Meeting Facilities Fee 697 -- ad proof pg. t — (HBMC 17.77), and Drainage (HBMC 17.79). The proposed ordinances will repeal existing HBMC Chapters 14.48 (Drainage) and 17.66 (library Development Fee). The proposed revisions to the existing fees and establishment of new fees are sup- ported by the Develop- ment Impact Fee Cal- culation and Nexus Report prepared by Revenue 8 Cost Spe- cialist, L.L.C. dated October 2011. The nexus report includes a com- prehensive Master Fa- cilities Plan of capital needs and acquisitions based upon the growth anticipated under the City's adopted General Plan. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request and supporting materials is on file in the Planning and Building Depart- ment, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, Cali- fornia 92648, for in- spection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office on Thursday, May 3, 2012. ALL INTERESTED PER- SONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Councirs action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence deliv- ered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning and Building Department at (714) 536-5271 and refer to the above Items. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, Cali- fornia 92648 714-536-5227 http:bTiuri ingtonbeach ca govAf ft blicCo mments✓ Published H.B. Indepen- dent April 26, 2012 --- ad proof pg. 2 --- :..._,..EDINGERAVE."= ...._.._._ - ._.....-...._._..__. _ _ - Zoning Conformance Matrix , -- :-.-.-.-- 1.19 TOM CENTER BOULEVARD S[GME HT �,` (E44 OESL^RPnOM ' � Mf �AXU If SDUMfDINMRMLdCNNgWU.COI.'M[D'ORAN of ANpll DE\CAt\tO Af �� {: � ( 1 •ml6 ANDIdiRACIXD.Ap4,A\P[ANMPi11ED iX 60]It IAE. PAUFf #AND 3RD` MNCfUANfOIri\MPf.IM1 iXt UPPC[d 1M1![UUNIYRECURDEADPDMNUC fOfFn • �: E.� { vMC4 t. �1 fMPVX dI PEMviM1Fn F\DOEl, PAGE 3f=F�N?[fINWS.N D@CPFC[Df iHf (' <- { ! CDLWA R^=URGER O[al4EXGt CUUXiry. AMCUI IAND I, A[J10WNON.1 MEJ n(EDW ed f. NGC iCOFMMHIM3,WMf dlKfd {� iz-: MCWNiY RECO\DFAd OIUNnf [tl1X7. 1: OWNER /APPLICANT.. � • _' � A7ehstone New Oeve/opment Holdings, LP. J MarArthur Place, Suite 600 NORTH _ Santa Ana, C.O.— 97707 f (714)689.7057 Alin- Samh K/eu5t!Pmeler SITE PLAN EDINGER APARTMENTS HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA c ARCHSTONE ARCHITECTS ORANGE 3 MwGrMDr Place SUITE6W SANTA ANA, GAL/FORNK9270771bWQ-M57 1N NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CALIFORNW 928M (714) 679Sa60 SCALE. 1"= 40' P AEN A2 I a 1 fUBMTTAL M .2 \3.15 DME PILE NUXBEPU: X % Archstone Huntington Beach at Edinger Project Benefits • Description - 510 unit multifamily apartment development on the southwest corner of Edinger Avenue and Gothard Street. • Status — Project is consistent with the Beach and Edinger Corridor Specific Plan and Archstone has submitted a site plan review application to the city. • Job Creation — Project is expected to create 1,000 jobs for construction workers and consultants throughout project planning and construction. • Permits and Fees — Project is estimated to net the city $8,729,753 before the proposed increase to permits and fees being voted on by city council May 7, 2012. • Increased Property Taxes — Property Tax Revenue Exisiting Parcels 2011 Tax Bill "r Tax Revenue =<:, 142- 321- 01 $10500 142-321-02 $13, 570 142-321-10 $18,901 142-321-12 $8,576 142-321-13 $32, 205 Total $83,752 Projected Taxes During Construction and Lease -up 2013-2017 Ave rape Tax Per Year $809,008 Stabilized Annual Taxes 2017 7`7, Total Tax $1,714,170 • Increased Sales Tax Revenue — 510 units will net between 750 and 1,100 new residents to Huntington Beach who will be shopping in the city and paying sales tax. • High Quality Residents — Project aims to house residents who meet Archstone's background check, credit standards, and income levels necessary to pay rent in accordance with The Fair Housing Act. • Affordable Housing - Project will contain 51 affordable housing units at moderate and low income levels. Archstone Edinger & Gothard Estimated Schedule through Construction Start Staff Approval (in months) Planning Commission (in months) -fifty Council (in months) w 0 Total Entitlement Period (in months) Design Period'til Construction Start (in Months) Total Entitlement & Design Period (in Months) Today's Date Range of Construction Start Dates Atresssive Conservative 4 6 2 3 2 3 8 12 12 12 20 24 - May-12 May-12 Dec-13 Apr-14 Time Period per Staff Time Period per Staff (preliminary feedback from staff indicates that the project will require Planning Commission approval) Time Period per Staff (my understanding is that most projects that require Planning Commission approval ultimately require City Council approval) Sum of Pieces Above Typically a 12 month process including design development, preparation of construction documents, and "plan check" by the city staff Sum of Pieces Above Resolution No. 2012-23 -Paragraph 8-Archstone's Proposed edits 8. Fee Imposed. The new Development Impact Fees set by this resolution shall not apply to projects that have submitted a site plan review application" appFeMal•on or before May 7, 2012 and the following milestones are met: 1. The site plan application has been deemed complete and the Project has received discretionary proiect entitlement approval on or before 360 days after the new fees go into effect or no later than June 20 2013. -1�2. Project has submitted an approved application for building permits within 270199 days after receipt of discretionary project entitlement approval the fee gaiRg ^'^ ^r' ^r no later than Marchjaaeary 20, 20143. 2-3. From the time of initial building permit application, the project makes continued progress toward satisfying plan check comments. 3,4. Building Permits are issued within twenty-five months3l&8-flays after the rew fees go into effect, no later than July 20, 20143. An exception to the above milestones is the involvement of an outside third party regulatory agency. In such cases the 2704E8 days to make building permit application will begin when the developer receives clearance from that agency. The City Manager shall have the authority to extend milestone dates for qualifying "grandfathered" projects in his sole discretion. All other projects are subject to the new fees, which go into effect July 20, 2012. All existing Development Impact Fees remain in effect until final action is taken on this resolution and respective ordinances. In the event any portion of this resolution is held invalid, the previously approved development impact fee shall automatically apply. Formatted: Indent: First line: 0"