The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCUP 90-16-Upheld PC and denied project to build church-N NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL C9WDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 9.0-16/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 90-13 (Appeal of Planning Commission'.s denial of a request to "permit construction of a church with joint, use of ,_parkinq at Seacliff Office Park) NOTICE I& HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold .a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach . . Civic. Centex.,_ 2000 Main Street., Huntington Beach, California, on the ,date and at the . time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish .to be heard relative 'to the applIi,cation described below.. -DATE/TIME: Monday, October 1, 1990, 7:00 PM. APPLICATION NUMBER: Conditional Use Permit No. 90-16/Negative Declaration No. 90-13 APPLICANT/ APPELLANT: Huntington Beach Church of Religious Science LOCATION: ' Northeast corner. of Seacliff Office Park (northeast of the intersection of Yorktown Avenue and Main Street) 'ZONE: OP-01-CD. .(Office. Professional-Combined with Oil Production and Drilling-Civic District) REQUEST :Appeal of ;thePlanning Commissions denial of a request to permit construction of a two-story, 42, 000 square foot church. with.-1,.835 seat capacity,. ncluding a one-level subterranean parking structure and joint. use of .surface parking at Seacliff Office Park: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Covered by Negative .Declaration No. 9.0-13, which the:;Council will also act .upon.. ON FILa A copy of 'the proposed request and appeal is on file. in - _ the Office of" the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington. Beach, .�Californi-a 92648, for inspection by the public.: .. ALL INTERESTED PLRSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions. or ' submit. evidence for or against the application as .outlined .above.- If there are any further" questions please call. Laura. Phillips, Associate Planner, at 536-5271. Connie Brockway City. Clerk (6946d) . •. v r '. '�� vJ i Legal Notice City of Huntingtori Beach Office of the City Cierk �\"Zd io•a P.O. BOX 190 Huntington Beach CA 9264$ __p 7T o lav t Al so �tyl _ Wkt )10443 _ - - David Dekoker- (/ 7331 Coho' Dr. #106 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 • 937-16-069. . �, FIRST CLASS MAIL NutiiiNcrrx�e[�c•H 1 " CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK October 12, 1990 Huntington Beach Church of Religious Science % Thomas E. Willard Willard Resource Development 7 Stillwater Irvine, CA 92716-4377 Dear Mr. Willard: The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held October 1, 1990, denied with findings, your application relative to Conditional Use Permit No. 90-16. This is a final decision. You are hereby notified that pursuant to provisions of Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedures of the State of California you have ninety days from October 12, 1990, to apply to the courts for judicial review relative to the Conditional Use Permit. Sincerely yours, Connie Brockway, CMC City Clerk CB:me Enclosure CC: Huntington Beach Company City Attorney Community Development Director City Administrator 1051K (Telephone:714.536-5227) § 1094.5 SPECIAI. PROCEEDINGS Part 3 Note 378 n.mided for n,•tv trial do not,-, Prrxcod % toiae,l romp ir:sioner hnd uu jurisdielion t'uliforoin I.'neuiploynwiii liix. .\ppimlx lid. toil did not deterntiue nwrits, Wemtern Air (1976) 127 CnLitplr. 5.10, 57 t'.A.ttd 21), I,Inem liu•, v, sobi"ki (11181) 32 Cnl.Itptr. Trial court's judgioviit d.•n3ing writ of 719, 101 C.A.'_d309. ninndote. 'to compel director rnf ogrividniro lNet. that letter diticharging mcnior typ- in set. nside him decixion revoking lwtltion- ist elcrk in office of count) clerk Hinted' er's license us aircraft pilot in business of Ibot Kati} wax guilty of utirronduct ill re- pest' control wnx revermed wid clime re moving public recordx from tho flies and ninnded to triml i•nurt with direetionm to mutilating 'and mecreiing them on vnrloum reinnnd vase to direetor fur purpose of dutcs, wliorenm in hcaring heforo.county 1 rcconnideriiig the pe.inity proviottmly im- civil "xervire cominixxlon evitlenre tviim iu- posed, where`it was found that somo of troduced only no to what. took place on the charges oguinmt petitioner wero not rine of the dates, did ant require the dim- mnliported by evidence. Wingfield v. I rlct roort of appeal on ni.penl from.judg- Director of Agriculture (197Y) M3, Unl- went awnrding xenior-typi,i clerk writ of Rptr.019,20 C.A.3d 209, mandate, nftee reversing tho judgment of I'roceediuIg fog review of denim.by rout- the superior court, tit ti:ninnd the nutt.ter mimsiono,r of atrpnrntlonm of .permit to to the , coonnixsion for rrronsideraIion, change voting rightx of xhureholderx wlicre. there wiix a idmilnrit,y of facts stir- would be. ri•tnnniled to muperior court. for rounding removal of the dficuoienlx on ,ill deterniiuntion whether there was suhslan-' of.the dntem. I•rslt t•. Los Angeles Coun- tial evidence to support cnnunimsioner's ty Civil Kervico Conitnixxiou (19G2) 2, fiudingm, where cmirt improperly deter- P.2d-3. 108 C.A.2d 114. 1094.6. Judicial review; decisions of local agencies; petition; filing; time; record;..decisibn and jiarty defined; or- dinanco or resohttion (a) Judicial review of any decision of a local agenc.•, other than school district, as the term local agency is defined in Section 54951 of. the Government Code, oi- of any commission, board, officer or agent th-.•reof, may be had pursuant to Section 1094.�i of this erode only if the petition" for writ;of mandate pursuant to such section is filed 1%vi thin the time limits:specified in this section.. (b) Any such petition shall be filed not later than the 90th day following the date'.on.which the decision becomes final. If.there is no provision for reconsideration of the decision in any applicable provi-. sibn of any statute, charter, or rule, for the purposes of this section, the decisi;lr_ is final on the date it is made. If there is such provision for reconsideration, the 'decision is final for the purposes of this sec- tion upon the expiration of the period during which such reconsidera- tion can.be sought; provided, that.if reconsideration is sought pursu- arit to•.any such provision the decision is final for the purposes of this section on the date that reconsideration is rejected. (c) The,comJlle(e record of the proccedi.ngs shall lx• lirepared by 1110. to cal agellcy or its t•olmilis!;ioll, board, Officer, or agent which made the decision and shall be tir.livercci to the petitioner within .90 bays ,iftor he has filed a written request therefor. The local agency may. recover from the petitioner its actual costs for transcribing or otherwise preparing the record. .Such record shall include the tran- Script of thtr r Proceedings, all pleadings,:all notices and oders, any proposed decision,by a hearing officer, the final decision, all admitted 674 l Title 1 WRIT OF MANDATE §. 1094.6 exhibits, all rejected exhibits in the possession of the local agency or ° Its commission, board,officer, or agent, all written evidence; and any other papers in the case. , (d) . If the. petitioner files a request for the record ns specified in stihflivixinn (t) within 10 daysstflcr the dltle the decision becomes fi- nal as provided in subdivision M` Iliv'Unie wilhin which a lietilion pursuant to Section 1094.5 tntty be filed shall he extended to-not later than the 30th day following the dote on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the petitioner_or his attorney of rec- ord, if he has one. (e) As used in this section, decision means adjudicatory admin- istrative decision made, after hearing, suspending, demoting, or dis- missing an officer or employee, revoking or denying an application for a permit or a license, or denying an application for any retire- ment benefit or allowance. (f) In making a final decision as defined in subdivision (e), the local agency shall provide notice to the party that the time within which judicial review must be sought is governed by this section. . As used in this subdivision, "party" means an officer or em- ployee who has been suspended, demoted or dismissed; a person whose permit or license has been-revoked or whose application for a permit or license has been denied; or a person whose application for a retirement benefit or allowance has been denied. (g) This section shall be applicable.in a local agency only if the governing board thereof adopts an ordinance or resolution making this :section applicable.:. If such ordinance or resolution is adopted, the provisions of this section shall prevail over any conflicting provision in any otherwise applicable law relating to the subject matter. (Added by Stats.1976, c.276,p.581, § 1.) Forms See West's California Code Forms, Civil Procedure, Library References Adminietrntive Lim- toil Procedurvv C.J.S. Public Adminir;trative Bodies and 0 7L'2. Procedure § 193. Notes of Decisions In general I Ihnt public employment relations hurnrd Exhaustion of administrative remedies 2 had Jurimlietion to determine whet.1wr the unfrtlr pruetice ehnrgus wore Justified; nod, in view of teachers' failure to exhim%t their mlinlniatrnlive remedies I. In general under Iho ftodoht Act. trial court erred in tirhool bourd's 'vuihiterul frevzing of granting writ of tnnnduto to compel supor- twtrhers, anhtries nfter het inning of nee• inleudeot of district loin others to to uise arilool )•ear, while enntrnel rtvgotintionx anhtri,•, of eortitiu teachers. Arnndor Vol- were peoiliug, arguuhly wris nn uofuir ley Ser'Iuulnry I?duentors Asc'II %. Newlin prueiice in violutiun of tha ltodtiu Art so (1070) 151 Cul.Ilptr. 724, &14 C.A.3d 25A. 675 Cq Office of the City Clerk � - ��` P � �;a N ` � � V IE city of Huntington Beach P �� eF"c� ` '' POSTS{gip n ep 5 P.O.BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 � a•, �<�.. ;__�" � FMETER »• 8010443 . a " �A a Hunt ton Be c Ch So/Rei ious e t09QPul a n sa �A-s�' � DC t ' CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK /10P 90 October 5, 1990 Bill Holman Huntington Beach Company c/o Huntington Seacliff 2134 Main Street, #185 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mr. Holman: The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held October 1, 1990, denied with findings, your application relative to Conditional Use Permit No. 90-16. This is a final decision. You are hereby notified that pursuant to provisions of Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedures of the State of California you have.ninety days from October 5, 1990, to apply to the courts for judicial review relative to the Conditional Use Permit. Sincerely yours, Connie Brockway, CMC V City Clerk CB:me CC: Huntington Beach Church of Religious Science City Attorney Community Development Director City Administrator 1051K (Telephone:714-536-5227) § 1094.5 SPECIAL, PROCEEDINGS Part 3 Note-378 nanded for ttvw trial de noto.. I'resentl �. mined ctunn i,:..iourr hnd tit, jurisdiction1 1:i0iforiiin 1'nenlldopnleut Ills. AIIp(.•nls OIL and did not',letermliw merits. \\'extern Air (111711) 127 Cal.nptr. 5-10, f)7''l'.:1.a�1 21)• Unem luc, v, Sobieski (I1181) 13 Cnl.11ptr. 'trial court'tt JmIgntew doming writ of 710, 1111 ('.A.':d 309, ntnndnle to compel dircctorof nt;riettitnro tract that letter dixchargitig senior typ- in yet nxitle 1114 dedision revoking petition- ist vIvrk in office of count,\ clerk ritnted er's livenye as aircraft pilol in hnxiItems t,f HIM xhc nVax guilty (if nlisronduct ill re- pest colitrol •wax raverxed wid c11xe. rr wovh%g public records from tho files and mnnded to trial court with direvOoux to uiutiinting and secreting them on vnrious rrnlnnd case- to director for purpose of (lutes, wherenx ill hearing heforo.county 1 reconsidering the penalty previously..in1- civil service commisslon evidence wits in- posed, where it was found tint 'some of troduced only -no to Mint look_ place on thu charges nKainst petitioner were not otle of tile. dntea, slid not require the dim- snpported h,v evidence. Wingfield v. t riot court n1' nppenl on al.penl front ju,lg- Director of Agriculture (1972) 105 Col. ment nwording senior typi..,t clerk writ of Rptr.619,20 C.A.3d 200. mandate, nftee reversing 1110 Judgment of I'rocoediuF forrnvicw of denial by oont_ the superior court, to renlnnd the matter mixsloner of corporations of 'permit to to tin t-re n for lv offnetation, . change voting rights of xhure.holdrrs Miler's. there was n xinlilnrily of facts xur- wuuld be rentnnded to xuperior court for rounding removal of the documents on all , deterntiuntion whether there. tens suhxtan. (if the dates. Prxlt v. Los Angeles Couh- tial evidence cu. support coniuliseioner's ty Civil Sortie. Coutinisaiou (1952) 2,18 findings,' where court 'improperly deter- P.2d 3, 108 C.A.2d 114. § 1094.6. Judicial review; decisions of local agencies; . petition; filing; time; record; decision and rarty•defined; or- dinance or ri�solution (a) Judicial review of any decision of a local agency, other than school district,as the term local.agency is defined in Section 54951 of the Government Code, or of any commission, board, officer or agent tht. reof, may be had pursuant to Section 1094:5 of this code only if the petition for writs of mandate pursuant : to such section is filed '%:'ithin the time limits:specified in this section. (b) Any'such petition shall be filed not later than the 90th day following the date on which the decision becomes final.. If there is no provision for reconsideration of the decision in any -applicable provi- sion of any statute, charter, or rule, for the purposes of this section, the decisK� is final on the date it is made. If there is such provision for reconsideration, the decision is final for the purposes of this sec- tion upon the expiration of the period during which such reconsidera- tion can be sought; provided, that if reconsideration is sought pursu- ant to.any such provision the decision is final for the purposes of this section on the date that reconsideration is rejected. . (c) The complete record of the proccedi ifis shall be prepared by ill(! local agency of itst'i)IIIIIIis!;ioll, board, officer, or agent which made the decision and shrill be d livered to the petitioner within 90 tiniys.sifter he has filed a written request therefor. The local agency may recover from- the petitioner its actual costs for transcribing or otherwise preparing the record. Such record shall include the tran- Script of th(.' proceedings, all pleadings, all notices,and orders, any proposed decision by a hearing officer, the final decision; all admitted 674 t • Title 1 WRIT OF MANDATE §, 1094.6 ' J exhibits, all rejected exhibits in the possession of the local agency or its commission, board, officer, or agent, all written evidence;and any other papers in the case. (d) If the petitioner files a request for the record as specified in :stihdivision (c) within 10 days afler.lhe dale the.decision becomes fi- nal as provided in subdivision (b); the tiine within which a licti(ion put:su:itit to Section 1094.5 inny 1)c filed shall he extended to not later than the 30th day following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the petitioner.or his attorney of rec- ord, if he has one. (e) As used in this section, decision means adjudicatory admin- istrative decision made, after hearing, suspending, demoting, or dis- missing an officer or employee, revoking or denying an application for a permit or a license, or denying an application for any retire- ment benefit or allowance. (f) In making a final decision.as defined in subdivision (e), the local agency shall provide notice to the party that t1;e time& within which judicial review must be sought is governed by this section. As used in this subdivision, "party" means an officer or em- ployee who has been suspended, demoted or dismissed; a person whose permit or license has been revoked or whose application for a permit or license has been denied; or a person whose application for a retirement benefit or allowance has been denied. (g) This section shall be applicable in a local agency only if the governing board thereof adopts an ordinance or resolution making this section applicable... If such ordinance or resolution is adopted, the prdvisions of this section shall prevail over any conflicting provision in any otherwise applicable law relating to.the subject matter. (Added by Stats.1976, c. 276,p.681, § 1.) Forms See West's California Code Formu, Civil.Procedure. Library References Admin it,trtttIve Lit and Procedure C..7.5. Public Admirthgtrative Bodies and 0-722. Procedure 193. Notes of Decisions In general I tint pnblie employment relnlionli bonrd Exhoustlon of administrative remedies 2 had exelnsivit jurisdiction to determine whether the tntfnir pruetice eltnrges were ,Ittstified; aud, in view of teacheru' failure to exlnutxt Iheir adminintrcttive remedies I. In general - nodes the Itoddit Ael. trial cnurt erred in School board's '7tuilnlerol frvv,zing of KrnnliI g writ of nuuulate to compel super- teuehnr..s' snhtrles nftrr hi-ginning of new iateod-�nt of district and othery to ruine sebool yenr, while enntrne( nt-gotimions >oilarie. of certain tenchers. Atnador Vul- tvcre pemdiog, tu•gtnthl)• wms an unfair lei• tee'i nlnry E'duentorm As:a'n t. Newlin pructice is violutiou of*thu Itoddu Art so (1070) 151 Cul.I ptr. 724, 88 C.A.3d 25-1. 675 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK October 5, 1990 Bill Holman Huntington Beach Company c/o Huntington Seacliff 2134 Main Street, #185 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mr. Holman: The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held October 1, 1990, denied with findings, your application relative to Conditional Use Permit No. 90-16. This is a final decision. You are hereby.notified that pursuant to provisions of Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedures of the State of California you have ninety days from October 5, 1990, to apply to the courts for judicial review relative to the Conditional Use Permit. Sincerely yours, Connie Brockway, CMC City Clerk CB:me CC: Huntington Beach Church of Religious Science City;Attorney Community Development Director City'Administrator 1051K (Telephone:714-536-5227) i § 1094;5 SPECIAI. PROCEEDINGS Part 3 Noto 378 n,anded f(ir nf•w trial do noto. i'ri,m-od %. minv,l cmum'i.-:xioner hnd uu jurixdirlion t'nlifornin 1'.nenaplaynu•ul his. .\l,tu•nlx 1141. and did nol drlernditr merits: \\:eAtorn Air (197,H) 127 Cal.Rptr. 6.10, 57 t'.A.3il 21), IJueH lac. v, NoWeAki (11161) 19 Cnl.ltptr. Trial court'H Judgownt il,•n3ing writ of 71(1, till (',A.'�d il)t). mandate to compel slit of ngrif ultnro Irnct that lector Qixcharging Henior typ- tn Net nxide hix decision n,vokiug petllima- ixt elvrk in office of couno clerk alitted er's license its aircraft pilot in buxmexH of I'hnt xhe wax guilty of misconduct in re- pest control wrtm revvi-med toad cost re • moving public records from Iho files and mnnded to Irial roar[ with dirvetionx to ❑ntliluting and xeereting them on vnrlous remand rase to. director, for pttrlime of dutcH,, whercaH iu hcaring hefora couuly I reconxidorWg the penalty previously -im- elvil x(,rvive eom nixxlun evidrnve wits in- posed, where it was found runt some of traduced only ns to what took place on rhu, charges ngainxt petitioner wero not ono of the fillies, dill not require the diA- Hul,ported . by evidence. Wingfield v: trio roitrt of appeal on nlgwal frnni judg. Direvi-or of Agriculture (1072) 1(f3 Cal. ment awarding Henior typi..t clerk writ of Rptr.619,29 C•.A.3d 200. mandate, nftet reversing tho Judgment of Proceeding for review of denial by rom- the superior court, rn remand the matter mixaloner• of rorporntionx of permit .to to tun c•fiuunixxion for rt-ousideralion, (•hange voting rightx of xharcholderH whcrn tht•re wax n ximilnritr of facts Aur- would he renannded to Huperior court for roumdiug retnnval of tht• documents on all determination whether there leas Auhxtan= of the dotes. i'rHtt v. Lux Angeles Coun- ty evidence to support cununiselotaer s t�• Civil Service t'ommissiou (1952) 2;38 fiudingA, where court improperly deter- I'.:d 3,des C.A.ld 111. 1094.6. Judicial review; decisions of local ageric:ies; petition; filing; time; record; decision and party defined;. or= dinance or resolution (a) Judicial review of any decision of a local agemc'v, other than school district, as the.term local agency is defined in Section 54951 of. the Government Code, of of any commission, board, officer or agent. th,. r'eof, maybe had pursuant to Section 1094:5 of this code only if the petition for writ:of. mandate pursuani . to such section is filed -%vithin the time-limits;specified in this section. (b) Any such petition shall be filed not later than the 90th day following the date on which the decision becomes final. If there is no . provision for reconsideration of the decision in any applicable provi- sion of any statute, charter, or. rule, for the purposes of this section, the decisiCo"Js final on the date it is made. If there is such provision for reconsideration, the decision is final for the purposes of this sec- tion upon the expiration of the period during which such reconsidera- tion can be provided, that if reconsideration is sought pursu- arit to:any such provision the decision is final for the purposes of this section on the.date. that reconsideration is rejected. (c) The c omplele rc c ord of i he lir�rccdi.ngs shall lx prepared by Ille local agency orits ('onlniis!cicm, board, officer, or ageii( which made the decision and shrill he delivered to the lietilioner within 90 (lays sifter he has filed .i written request therefor. The local agency may recover from the petitioner its actual.costs for transcribing or otherwise preparing the record. Such record shall include the tran- Script of thu proceedings, all pleadings, all notices rind orders, any proposed decision by a hearing officer, the final decision, all admitted 674 Title 1 WRIT OF MANDATE §. 1094.6 exhibits, all rejected exhibits in the possession of the local agency or its commission, board, officer, or agent, all written evidence;•and any other papers in the case.. (d) If the petitioner files a request for the record ns specified in ;stihdivision (c) within 10 bays sifter the hale the decision becomes fi- nal as provided in subdivision (b)', (he lisle within which st petition pursuant to Section 1094.5 may he filed shall he extended to not later than the 30th day following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the petitioner or his attorney of rec-. ord, if he has one. (e) As used in this'section, decision means adjudicatory admin- istrative decision made, after hearing, suspending, demoting, or dis- missing an officer or employee, revoking or denying an application for a permit or a license, or denying an application for any retire- ment benefit or allowance. (f) In making a final decision as defined in subdivision (e), the local agency shall provide notice to the party that the time within which judicial review must be sought is governed by this section. As used in this subdivision, "party" means an officer or em- ployee who has been suspended, demoted or dismissed; a person whose permit or license has been revoked or whose application for a permit or license has been denied; or a person whose application for a retirement benefit or allowance has been denied. (g) This section shall be applicable in a local agency only if the governing board thereof adopts an ordinance or resolution making this section applicable.:. If such ordinance or resolution is adopted, the pr6visions of this section shall prevail over any conflicting provision in any otherwise applicable law relating to the subject matter. (Added by Stats.1976, c. 276,p. 681, § 1.) Forms See Wei;04 California C otie Forms, Civil Procedure. Library References A(Iminirtrntive Ntw tool Procedure C.T.S. Public. Adminirtrative Bodies and 0-722. Procedure § 193. Notes of Decisions In general 1 that lntblic employment relatlons honed Exhaustion of administrative remedies 2 lini exi•lw�ivi) jurindietlon to dctnrmine whether t.ho unfair prumtice chargem were ,luetified; tool, In view of teaebem' failure to cxhnu+t Iheir ndlninitttrative retnedicii I. In general under the Itodda Ae1, trial court erred in Nclimpi he.nrd'm tmilntitral freezing; of g;rnntin{; writ of mandate to compel truiter- len Nalttriea after heg;imting; of new inlondent of dixtrict and others to ruir♦o Hohnol year, while enutrnel neg;otintionv wtlnri-•s of eortnin teneheru. Ainndor Vitt- were i1anding, nrgunhl�• wam tm nnfnir lei• See4mdnry IComntnry Ams'n t. Newlin pruclice iu violutiutt of the ltodtltt Act sn (1970) IG1 Cul.Rptr. 724, `dti C.A.3d 25-1. 675 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date October 1 . 1990 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator Prepared by: Michael Adams, Director of Community Developme t ^, = C7: %`F Subject: APPEAL-CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90-16/ NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 90-13: �'" m r�,om� CHURCH OF RELIGIOUS SCIENCE Cn s Consistent with Council Policy? [ ] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception n Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE• The Church of Religious Science is appealing the Planning Commission' s denial of their request to construct a 2-story, 42, 000 sq. ft . church building at the northeast corner of Seacliff Office Park. The proposed church would have a maximum 1, 842 seat capacity. The church representatives feel that the Planning Commission did not understand or respond to aspects of the project including traffic, pollution, time of use, noise, or impacts to Seacliff Office Park, Pacific Ranch and the City of Huntington Beach. RECOMMENDATION• STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. "Motion to approve Negative Declaration No. 90-13 . " 2 . "Motion to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 90-16 with findings and Conditions of Approval as outlined in the RCA. " ALTERNATIVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION: "Motion to continue Negative Declaration' No. 90-13 and Conditional Use Permit No. 90-16 for a period of 60-days as requested by the applicant in a letter dated September 20, 1990 . " Planning Commission Recommendation "Motion to Deny Conditional Use Permit No . 90-16 with findings as outlined in the RCA. " Plo 5/85 Planning Commission Action On August 7, 1990, the Planning Commission approved Negative Declaration No. 90-13 by the following vote: Ayes : Mountford, Williams, Ortega, Shomaker, Leipzig, Bourguignon, Kirkland Noes : None Absent: None Abstain: None The Planning Commission also denied Conditional Use Permit No . 90-16 by the following vote, with findings : Ayes : Mountford, Williams, Ortega, Shomaker, Bourguignon, Kirkland Noes : Liepzig Absent None Abstain None ANALYSIS• APPLICANT/APPELLANT: Huntington Beach Church of Religious Science, represented by Thomas Willard. LOCATION• Northeast corner of Seacliff Office Park (northeast corner of Main Street and Yorktown Avenue) ISSUES• The church proposes to construct a new 42, 000 square foot church building and subterranean parking structure, and to utilize up to 450 of Seacliff Office Park' s existing parking spaces . This joint use of parking is further discussed below. The proposed two-story building includes a 1, 842 seat sanctuary, classrooms, multi-use rooms, offices, a bookstore and small chapel . In addition to 53 surface parking spaces, 111 spaces will be provided in a one-level subterranean structure. An existing 6 foot high to 14 foot high slump block wall separates the site from adjacent residences and carports at Pacific Ranch, and is proposed to remain. The two primary issues are parking, and compatibility of the proposed church with surrounding office and residential uses . The applicant is requesting joint use of parking with Seacliff Office Park, in accordance with Section 9602 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. The code states that a reduction in the total number of parking spaces required by the sum of separate uses may be RCA - October 1, 1990 -2- (7020d) granted when it can be shown that the various uses have divergent needs in terms of daytime versus nighttime hours, or weekday versus weekend hours . The primary use of the church building will be on weekends and weeknights, as opposed to weekdays for the office complex. The weekday users of the church building can be parked on the church site, without need for joint use parking with the offices . The Huntington Beach Company, owners of both Seacliff Office Park and the church site, have agreed to the proposed joint use parking agreement (see attached letter dated May 31, 1990) , and a formal agreement will be recorded prior to issuance of building permits . Staff, however, has remained concerned with the level of activity on the site, and its potential impacts on the parking lot and surrounding area. The applicant has down-scaled the original request due to concerns of staff and the adjacent residents that the proposed number of people on the site, particularly on weeknights and Saturdays, may be incompatible with adjacent residential uses . The noise, lights, auto traffic and activity associated with a large church use on the site will exceed the intensity normally associated with an office park in an OP (Office Professional) Zone. The following chart shows the maximum number of spaces available at various times on the church site and office park, the maximum occupancy allowed by code for the church based on three (3) seats per parking space, the church' s currently requested occupancy, and a modified recommendation by staff : Max. Occ. Current Parking Spaces Avail Allowed by Occupancy Staff On-site Office Park Parking Avail . Reauested Proposal Weekdays 8 am - 6 pm 164 0 492 164 164 Weekday National Holidays 8 am - 10:30 pm 164 450 1842 1842 1842 Weeknights 6 pm - 10:30 pm 164 110 822 550 300 Friday Night 6 pm - llpm 8 times/year 164 110 822 1000 300 Saturday 8 am - 6 pm 164 170 1002 550 200 Saturday 8am - 6pm 6 times/year 164 420 1752 1000 1000 Sunday 8 am - 10 pm 2 primary services and ancillary activities 164 450 1842 1842 1842 F f• RCA - October 1, 1990 -3- (7020d) The applicant has indicated to staff that their requested occupancy represents maximum useage, which will rarely be attained. In support of this statement, the applicant has submitted a tabulation of average weekly attendance and major program attendance at their current facility at Seacliff Shopping Center. (Attached to Planning Commission Staff Report dated August 7, 1990) . Staff feels that at the revised occupancy for weeknights, Friday nights and Saturdays, most people will be able to park in the subterranean structure beneath the church, and enter the building through the structure. This will reduce noise and disturbance to residential neighbors . A public hearing review should be held after six months, and again after one year of occupancy, to allow the Planning Commission to review the conditions of approval for adequacy, and to add, delete or modify conditions as appropriate. The applicant may request revised maximum occupancy limits after one year. If, at such public hearing, the Planning Commission finds that the church' s on-going activities are not compatible with adjacent residents, the church may be required to reduce the intensity of use. Staff has received a petition containing 81 signatures in opposition to the construction of the church, as well as 17 letters of opposition. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Community Development advertised draft Negative Declaration No. 90-13 for a twenty-one (21) day review and comment period prior to the hearing date. The staff, in its initial study of the project, has recommended that a negative declaration be issued. The Huntington Beach Environmental Board commented on the Draft Negative Declaration, and- staff has responded to the comments . These items are attached to the Planning Commission Staff Report dated June 19, 1990 . Prior to any action on Conditional Use Permit No" 90-16, it is necessary for the City Council to review an act on Negative Declaration No. 90-13 . FUNDING SOURCE: Not Applicable. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: 1 . The City Council may continue this item for a period of sixty (60) days as requested by the applicant in the attached letter dated September 20, 1990 . 2 . The City Council may approve Negative Declaration No. 90-13 and Conditional Use Permit No . 90-16 with findings and conditions of approval, as requested by the applicant . RCA - October 1, 1990 -4- (7020d) .w ATTACHMENTS: 1. Letter dated September 20, 1990 requesting a sixty (60) day continuance. 2 . Findings and Conditions of Approval 3 . Alternative Findings for Denial 4 . Appeal Letter dated August 14, 1990 5 . Staff Report dated August 7, 1990 6 . Staff .Report dated July 10, 1990 7 . Staff Report dated June 19, 1990 8. Petition and Letters of Opposition MTU:MA:LP: lp RCA - October 1, 1990 - 5- (7020d) PACIFIC ,/� I� x J' u CONDO RANCH r'r aly.r ice!(`•,\4../ •Y 1 \\e/// `• CONDOMINIUMS ------------- t +,� �.J 1V JU � PROJECT STATISTICS Fry jF DEP ,RTM_ 'T O• C - 1 I SITE ZONE: OP-01-CD eji I";I Carport. 57 7.f ) SITE SIZE: 70.716 S,F. COrv1 4U IT! VLL ?PEE PROPOSED BNl01NO COVERAGE: 27.061 S.F. 121x1 PL,ppp///NW - DIVA 77�� yq��= �7� ��7� ��[[[�77�� 7-7�7I CHURCH LANDSCAPED AREA ALLOWABLE: 7,169 S.F.Il0.1X1 / 11 I I Ill I I U I I I IT`�I�I I U I I IT�I I I l SITE :•�j / 1,-- PUBLIC OPEN SPACE: •11,000 S.F.113\I ! E.1 cling P.rking r ! C I FIRST FLOOR AREA: 20.977 S.F. SECOND FLOOR AREA: 15.660 S.F. LOWER LEVELINON-PARKING; 6.009 S.F. BUILDING TOTAL/CHURCH USE: 12.361 S.F. o -- — ^:d GARAGE AREA: 15,975 S.F. I`-"•" A/2-1 OCCUPANCY: 16,000 S.F. 5-2 OCCUPANCY: 26.961 SF. 5-1 OCCUPANCY: 1S,975 S,F. ",;. 0 rj- ;. E%IST1H0 SEACW FF SANCTUARY SEATING: 2,000 Par—Mrs. OFFICE PARK EXISTING •'�'� 11e1 E.leling PACIFIC RANCH 1 P.rking Sp....I CONDOMINIUMS I 6a ' ul REOUIRED PARKING:113 1 1 1 Der 2 S..1.X2,000•607 Space. PARKING ON GRADE: 52 Space. � PARKING IN GARAGE: 111 Sp.cea , W u' w u I TOTAL PARKING ON CHURCH SITE: •161 Spetea ~ MANSION Vl " W H W¢ 1 PROPERTY PARKING SHARED W/OFFICE PARK: 161 Space. O' I < TOTAL PARKING IMMED.AVAIL 615 Specee ''w„ice;�i^ r• +f y ' n l l l l l l l l l i l l l l l;l l l l n l l l l l l l l l l l l(1 ! COMPACT PARKING/CHURCH SITE: e 9 Spec al 5%) OS 1 ) /! N COMPACT PAAKINGIOFFICE PARK; a 100 Spa<ea Q1 uIIIIIIRIIIIIII II i 1 �Eelallnp Parking TOTAL COMPACT PARKING: a 109 Sp.eaa 117 X) S 110s' 1>Zf�F iON 'GNI �i e9 1 P tag 1-0 H'z i YORKTOWN AVENUE 1rf�r'K2ZIrnnr pZa;CZ2i r ' J/-11pF5• f.f� d=o zz.l ''IC'vJ it A NEW FACILITY FOR HUNTINGTON BEACH PROJECT SITE LOCATION Ai.A4D AND ADJACENT LAND USE yI,i 4 CHURCH OF RELIGIOUS SCIENCE • y�t 1 tlkd a,'.. i . I Iif• ;`��rf�il ll}IT"1S�L.FY s..r�t -* 'y� �_ x jh-X- _�y s-i v' 21"9k .i "� C•,r5-s4-r$ s.y' `-c-;w t11 # i - - -_ � K 7.r h u -y -, 2''J. `:.X y:-,.,.4 u; Fr� � 7• 2 - a r '�i4_..jai^ s�..c M —41 Y WIUARU :RESOURC :DEV.ELOPMENT t. APPLlEQ REAL ESTATE TECHNOLOGY Y September 20, 1990rn Ms. Connie Brookway o rn,�� city Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street r Huntington Beach, California 92648 0 RE: conditional use permit No. 90-16 for the Huntington Beach Church of Religious Scienoe City counsel Hearing an October 1,. 1990 Dear conni.e: I represent Huntington Beach church of Religious Science in their C.U. P. application for a new church location at the SeaCliff Office Park. I have spoken to Shelley Stice (Mike Adam' s secretary) about the church ' s request for a continuance of the above referenced City Council hearing. After conferring with Mike, Shelley instructed: me that a letter to you would suffice to request both the' continuance and the delay of the hearing notification mailing to the neighborhood. The church it working with the Huntington Beach Company, the land owner, and Hanes Mencer and Associates, the architectural firm, to create parking and building use modifications that will satisfy the neighbors who are resistant to the project. We do not have sufficient time prior to October 1 for design modifications and exploration of church operational alternatives. We need :at least 6o ,more days and prefer to wait to set a hearing date until we are closer to completion of our plan changes. I will follow this letter with a phone call on Friday, September 21, to confirm this request. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. _ Sincerely, L (n ' ro�rr Thomas E. Willard 7 Stillwater, Irvine • (714) 854-6445 L&�h Mailing Address: P.O. Box 4377 • Irvine, California 92716-4377 09-21-90 09: G8AM FU:_ l O ATTACHMENT NO. 2 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90-16 : 1. The location, site layout, and design of the proposed church, combined with the proposed occupancy and hours of operation as modified by staff, properly adapts the proposed structure to streets, driveways, and other adjacent structures and uses in a harmonious manner. The building is compatible with adjoining offices and is oriented away from residential development . 2 . The combination and relationship of one proposed use to another on site are properly integrated. 3 . The access to and parking for the proposed church does not create an undue traffic problem because adequate parking will be available for joint use, and a Transportation Management Program will be required to further reduce trips . CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan, floor plans and elevations received and dated June 6, 1990, shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following modification: a. Surface compact spaces shall have minimum 15 foot long paved surface. 2 . Prior to submittal for building permits, the applicant/owner shall complete the following: a . Depict all utility apparatus, such as but not limited to backflow devices and Edison transformers, on the site plan. They shall be prohibited in the front and exterior yard setbacks unless properly screened by landscaping or other method as approved by the Community Development Director. b. Floor plans shall depict natural gas stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units; and low-volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets . c. Elevations shall depict colors and building materials as approved by the Design Review Board on May 17, 1990 . d. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened from any view. Said screening shall be architecturally compatible with the building in terms of materials and colors . If screening is not designed specifically into the building, a rooftop mechanical equipment plan must be submitted showing screening and must be approved. RCA - October 1, 1990 -6- (7020d) e. If outdoor lighting is included, energy savings lamps shall be used. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties and shall be noted on the site plan and elevations . f. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer. This analysis shall include on-site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations, retaining walls, streets, and utilities . g. The site is within the Alquist-Priolo region and must be investigated for evidence of faulting prior to issuance of any permits . Evidence of faulting will require the entire project to be re-reviewed by the Planning Commission. The completed geotechnical report, including recommendations for the acceleration to be used for designing the structures on the site, or a statement that the adopted Uniform Building Code is adequate for the seismic design of the structures on the site, shall be submitted to the Public Works Department. The Public Works Department will obtain an independent analysis of the completed geologic report. The cost of this analysis will be paid by the applicant. When the report has been amended to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department, the City will file the report with the State Geologist. Construction drawings along with calculations and the approved geologic report shall be submitted to the Department of Community Department to complete the permit plan review. h. The site plan shall include (or reference page) all conditions of approval imposed on the project printed verbatim. 3 . Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/owner shall complete the following: a. A Landscape Construction Set must be submitted to the Departments of Community Development and Public Works and must be approved. The Landscape Construction Set shall include a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State Licensed Landscape Architect and which includes all Proposed/existing plant materials (location, type, size, quantity) , an irrigation plan, a grading plan, an approved site plan, and a copy of the entitlement conditions of approval . The landscape plans shall be in conformance with Section 9608 and Article 963 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. The set must be approved by both departments prior to issuance of building permits . b. Landscape irrigation system shall be designed and constructed to include a separate water line for the use of reclaimed water subject to Water Department approval . RCA - October 1, 1990 -7- (7020d) c. A grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and it must be approved (by issuance of a grading permit) . A plan for silt control for all water runoff from the property during construction and initial operation of the project may be required if deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works. d. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid. e. The applicant and the owner of Seacliff Office Park shall record a covenant which guarantees that the office parking lot will be available for use by the church after 6 : 00 PM on weeknights and from 8 : 00 AM to 9 : 00 PM on weekends . Said covenant shall remain in effect for the life of the church use on the site. The covenant shall be approved as to form and content by the City Attorney' s office and the Department of Community Development. The covenant may be amended or rescinded only after approval by the City and property owners . 4 . Fire Department Requirements are as follows : a. An automatic fire sprinkler system and fire alarm system shall be approved and installed pursuant to Fire Department regulations . b. Service roads and fire lanes, as determined by the Fire Department, shall be posted and marked. c. Fire access lanes shall be maintained. If fire lane violations occur and the services of the Fire Department are required, the applicant will be liable for expenses incurred. d. Two on-site fire hydrants shall be provided at locations specified by the Fire Department prior to combustible construction. e. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, standards and specifications . f . Development shall meet all local and State regulations regarding installation and removal of all underground storage tanks . g. City Specifications 422 and 429, "Oil Well Abandonment Process" and "Methane Overlay District Requirements" must be adhered to. RCA - October 1, 1990 -8- (7020d) 5 . Hours of operation and maximum occupancy shall be limited as follows : Weekdays 8 am - 6 pm 164 Weekday National Holidays 1842 Weeknights 6 pm - 10 :30 pm 300 Friday Night 6 pm - 11 pm 300 Saturday 8am - 6 pm 200 Sunday 8 am - 10 pm 1842 6 . Seating in the sanctuary shall be limited to 1, 842 seats (a maximum of 2, 763 linear feet of pew seating) . 7. There shall be no use of outdoor bells, chimes, public address systems, music, or other source of sound which may disturb adjacent residents 8 . The parking structure shall incorporate a textured, non-squeal surface. 9 . The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 10 . All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. 11. Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be completed prior to final inspection. 12 . During construction, the applicant shall : a. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems in all areas where vehicles travel to keep damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site; b. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day; c. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts . 13 . Construction shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7: 00 AM to 8 : 00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays . 14 . Conditional Use Permit No. 90-16 ,shall become null and void unless exercised within one (1) year of the date of final approval, or such extension of time as may be granted by the Planning Commission pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. RCA - October 1, 1990 - 9 - (7020d) 15 . Should a Traffic Impact Fee be adopted by the City Council, the applicant/property owner shall be responsible for paying such fee prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and/or final building permit approval. 16 . The developer will be responsible for the payment of any additional fees adopted in the upcoming Water Division Financial Master Plan. 17 . A review of the use shall be conducted within six (6) months of the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy and one year after issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. Said review shall be conducted by the Planning Commission at a duly noticed public hearing. The Planning Commission may add, delete or amend conditions of approval as necessary to resolve problems identified at such public hearing. If, at that time, there is any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, the Planning Commission may revoke Conditional Use Permit No. 90-16 . The applicant may request revised occupancy limits and/or hours of operation at the one-year review. 18 . Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall obtain approval of a Transportation Management Plan by the Director of Community Development . The Plan shall outline steps which the applicant will implement to reduce parking demand. Steps may include development of a ridesharing program, incentives to utilize public transportation, or other appropriate measures . Effectiveness of the program shall be evaluated at the six month review. RCA - October 1, 1990 -10- (7020d) ATTACHMENT NO. 3 Alternative Findings for Denial 1. The proposed church will not be compatible with adjacent residential uses or the existing office park because the noise and traffic generated by a 1, 842 seat capacity building will be excessive. 2 . On-site parking, circulation and access are inadequate for the proposed 2 story, 42, 000 square feet church because there is not adequate parking on site for the amount of demand generated. RCA - October 1, 1990 -11,- (7020d) 0) HUNTINGTON BEACH CHURCH OF RELIGIOUS SCIENCE PEGGY BASSETT,Minister August 14, 1990 s G G `+ Ms . Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Ms . Brockway: v We, Huntington Beach Church of Religious Science, the applicant, wish to appeal to the City Council the decision of the Planning Commission to deny the Conditional Use Permit #90-16 to allow the church use of the property at the Seacliff Office Park. Our check for $200 . 00 is enclosed for the filing of this appeal . Please advise if there is any additional information required. Sincer , Rev. ger W. Teel, D.D. Asso to Minister la/'O EACLIFF VILLAGE f EE 2� MAIN STREET ,,HUNTINGTON BEACH,CALI I A 926 TELEPHONE(714)969-1331 O huntington beach department of community development SYAf f .-REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Community Development DATE: August 7, 1990 SUBJECT: : CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90-16/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 90-13 (CONTINUED FROM JULY 10, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING) APPLICANT: Huntington Beach Church DATE ACCEPTED: of Religious Science May 8, 1990 3090 Pullman St . Ste. B Costa Mesa, CA 92626 MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE: 60 Days from Final PROPERTY Huntington Beach Company Environmental Determination OWNER: c/o Huntington Seacliff 2134 Main St . Ste. 185 ZONE: OP-01-CD (Office Hunt. Beach, CA 92648 Professional-Combined with Oil Drilling-Civic District) REQUEST: To construct a 2-story, 42, 000 sq. ft. church with GENERAL PLAN: Office 1, 935 seat capacity, Professional including a one level subterranean parking structure and ACREAGE: 1. 62 acres joint use of parking at Seacliff Office Park. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Seacliff Office Park, northeast of Yorktown Ave. and Main Street 1. 0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Approve Negative Declaration No. 90-13 and Conditional Use Permit No. 90-16 as modified by staff, with findings and conditions of approval . 2 . 0 GENERAL INFORMATION: This item was first presented to the Planning Commission on June 19 , 1990 . Since only four (4) Commissioners were present, the item was continued to July 10, 1990, in order to allow the project to be reviewed by the full Commission. However, subsequent to printing of the staff report for July 10, the applicant requested an increase in hours of operation and maximum occupancy over that originally proposed and outlined in the staff report. The Planning Commission continued the proposal to August 7, 1990, in order to allow staff time to analyze the revised request . .r. ------------------------- A-FM-23C 3 . 0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS : The applicant has met with staff since the July 10, 1990 meeting, and has again revised the requested hours and occupancy limits . The following table compares the original request of June 19 , the revised proposal submitted o.rr July 10, and the applicant ' s current proposal . Original Request July 10 Request Current Request Weekdays Weekdays Weekdays 8 : 00 am-6 : OO pm 7: 00 am-6 : 00 pm 8 : 00 am-6 : 00 pm 75 people 164 people (except 164 people holidays - up to 1, 842 people) National Holidays 8 : 00 am - 10 : 30 pm 1842 people Weeknights Weeknights 6 : 00 pm- 6 : 00 pm-10 : 00 pm Midnight Weeknights 300 people 722 people 6 : 00 pm-10 : 00 pm 550 people Saturday Saturday 8 : 00 am-9 : 00 pm 7 : 00 am-6 : 00 pm Friday Night 200 people 1, 002 people (may 6 : 00 pm-11 : 00 pm extend past 8 times per year 6 : 00 pm eight 1000 people times per year) Saturday Saturday 8 : 00 am-6 : 00 pm 6 : 00 pm-Midnight 550 people 1, 752 people (six times Saturday per year) 8 : 00 am-6 : 00 pm 6 times per year Sunday Sunday 1000 people 1, 935 people per 1, 842 people per service service plus up Sunday to 722 people for 8 : 00 am-10 : 00 pm ancillary 1842 people per activities service plus (including auxillary evenings) activities The applicant has down-scaled the request due to concerns of staff and the adjacent residents that the proposed number of people on the site, particularly on weeknights and Saturdays, may be incompatible with adjacent residential uses . The noise, lights, auto traffic and activity associated with a large church use on the site will exceed the intensity normally associated with an office park in an OP (Office Professional) Zone. Staff Report - 8/7/90 -2- (6677d) The applicant had based the July 10, 1990, request on the maximum occupancy possible, given the number of parking spaces that the Huntington Beach Company was willing to grant for joint use in the office parking lot at a given time. The following chart shows the maximum number of spaces available at various times on the church site and office park, the maximum occupancy allowed at three (3) seats per parking space, and the currently requested occupancy. Max. Occ . Current Parking ' Spaces Avail Allowed by Occupancy On-site Office Park Parking Avail . Requested Weekdays 8 am - 6 pm 164 0 492 164 Weekday National Holidays 8 am - 10 : 30 pm 164 450 1842 1842 Weeknights 6 pm - 10 :30 pm 164 110 822 550 Friday Night 6 pm - llpm 8 times/year 164 110 822 1000 Saturday 8 am - 6 pm 164 170 1002 550 Saturday 8 am - 6 pm 6 times/year 164 420 1752 1000 Sunday 8 am - 10 pm 2 primary services and ancillary activities 164 450 1842 1842 The applicant has indicated to staff that the current requested occupancy represents maximum useage, which will rarely be attained. In support of this statement, the applicant has submitted a tabulation of average weekly attendance and major program attendance at their current facility at Seacliff Shopping Center (see Attachment 2) . Prior to the July 10, 1990 hearing, staff received a petition from the residents of Pacific Ranch opposing the use of the site as a church. The petition contained approximately 100 signatures and was based on concerns with traffic and . noise. Despite the applicant ' s revised request, staff continues to be concerned that the regular intensity of use on Saturdays and weeknights will far exceed an acceptable intensity of offic park uses which maybe a possible detriment to adjacent residents . Therefore, the following modifications and conditions of approval are suggested. Staff Report - 8/7/90 -3- (6677d) The weeknight, Friday night, and regular Saturday attendance (bold print in previous chart) should be reduced for a minimum period of one year, as follows : Weeknights 6 pm - 10 pm - 300 people Friday nights 6 pm - 10 pm - 300 people Saturday 8 am - 6 pm - 200 people At this occupancy, most people will be able to park in the subterranean structure beneath the church, and enter the building through the structure. This will reduce noise and disturbance to residential neighbors . A public hearing review will be held after six months , and again after one year of occupancy, to allow the Planning Commission to review the conditions of approval for adequacy, and to add, delete or modify conditions as appropriate. The applicant may request revised maximum occupancy limits after one year. If, at such public hearing, the Planning Commission finds that the church' s on-going activities are not compatible with adjacent residents, the church may be required to reduce the intensity of use. 4 . 0 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Negative Declaration No . 90-13 and Conditional Use Permit No . 90-16 as modified by staff, with the following findings and conditions of approval : FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90-16 : 1. The location, site layout, and design of the proposed church, combined with the proposed occupancy and hours of operation as modified by staff, properly adapts the proposed structure to streets, driveways, and other adjacent structures and uses in a harmonious manner . The building is compatible with adjoining offices and is oriented away from residential development . 2 . The combination and relationship of one proposed use to another on site are properly integrated. 3 . The access to and parking for the proposed church does not create an undue traffic problem because adequate parking will be available for joint use, and a Transportation Management Program will be required to further reduce trips . CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan, floor plans and elevations received and dated June 6, 1990, shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following modification: a. Surface compact spaces shall have minimum 15 foot long paved surface. Staff Report - 8/7/90 -4- (6677d) 2 . Prior to submittal for building permits, the applicant/owner shall complete the following: a . Depict all utility apparatus, such as but not limited to backflow devices and Edison transformers, on the site plan. They shall be prohibited in the front and exterior yard setbacks unless properly screened by landscaping or other method as approved by the Community Development Director. b. Floor plans shall depict natural gas stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters , and central heating units; and low-volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets . c. Elevations shall depict colors and building materials as approved by the Design Review Board on May 17, . 1990 . d. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened from any view. Said screening shall be architecturally compatible with the building in terms of materials and colors . If screening is not designed specifically into the building, a rooftop mechanical equipment plan must be submitted showing screening and must be approved. e. If outdoor lighting is included, energy savings lamps shall be used. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent. "spillage" onto adjacent properties and shall be noted on the site plan and elevations . f . A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer. This analysis shall include on-site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations, retaining walls, streets, and utilities . g. The site is within the Alquist-Priolo region and must be investigated for evidence of faulting prior to issuance of any permits . Evidence of faulting will require the entire project to be re-reviewed by the Planning Commission. The completed geotechnical report, including recommendations for the acceleration to be used for designing the structures on the site, or a statement that the adopted Uniform Building Code is adequate for the seismic design of the structures on the site, shall be submitted to the Public Works Department. The Public Works Department will obtain an independent analysis of the completed geologic report . The cost of this analysis will be paid by the applicant. When the report has been amended to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department, the City will file the report with the State Geologist. Construction drawings along with calculations and the approved geologic report shall be submitted to the Department of Community Department to complete the permit plan review. Staff Report - 8/7/90 -5- (6677d) , h. The .site plan shall include (or reference page) all conditions of approval imposed on the project printed verbatim. 3 . Prior to issuance of building- permits, the applicant/owner shall complete the following: a . A Landscape Construction Set must be submitted to the .Departments of Community Development and Public Works and must be approved. The Landscape Construction Set shall include a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State Licensed Landscape Architect and which includes all proposed/existing plant materials (location, type, size, quantity) , an irrigation plan, a grading plan, an approved site plan, and a copy of the entitlement conditions of approval . The landscape plans shall be in conformance with Section 9608 and Article 963 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. The set must be approved by .both departments prior to issuance of building permits . b. Landscape irrigation system shall be designed and constructed to include a separate water line for the use of reclaimed water subject to Water Department approval . c. A grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and it must be approved (by issuance of a grading permit) . A plan for silt control for all water runoff from the property during construction and initial operation of the project may be required if deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works . d. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid. e. The applicant and the owner of Seacliff Office Park shall record a covenant which guarantees that the office parking lot will be available for use by the church after 6 : 00 PM on weeknights and from 8 : 00 AM to 9 : 00 PM on weekends . Said covenant shall remain in effect for the life of the church use on the site. The covenant shall be approved as to form and content by the City Attorney' s office and the Department of Community Development . The covenant may be amended or rescinded only after approval by the City and property owners . 4 . Fire Department Requirements are as follows : a . An automatic fire sprinkler system and fire alarm system shall be approved and installed pursuant to Fire Department regulations . b. Service roads and fire lanes, as determined by the Fire Department, shall be posted and marked. c. Fire access lanes shall be maintained. If fire lane violations occur and the services of the Fire Department are required, the applicant will be liable for expenses incurred. Staff Report - 8/7/90 -6- (6677d) d. Two on-site fire hydrants shall be provided at locations specified by the Fire Department prior to combustible construction. e. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, standards and specifications . f . Development shall meet all local and State regulations regarding installation and removal of all underground storage tanks . g . City Specifications 422 and 429 , "Oil Well Abandonment Process" and "Methane Overlay District Requirements" must be adhered to. 5 . Hours of operation and maximum occupancy shall be limited as follows : Weekdays 8 am - 6 pm 164 Weekday National Holidays 1842 Weeknights 6 pm - 10 : 30 pm 300 Friday Night 6 pm - ll. pm 300 Saturday 8am - 6 pm 200 Sunday 8 am - 10 pm 1842 6 . Seating in the sanctuary shall be limited to 1, 842 seats (a maximum of 2, 763 linear feet of pew seating) . 7. There shall be no use of outdoor bells, chimes, public address systems , music, or other source of sound which may disturb adjacent residents . 8 . The parking structure shall incorporate a textured, non-squeal surface. 9 . The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 10 . All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped .to handle them. 11 . Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be completed prior to final inspection. 12 . During construction, the applicant shall : a . Use water trucks or sprinkler systems in all areas where vehicles travel to keep damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site; Staff Report - 8/7/90 -7- (6677d) b. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day; c. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts . 13 . Construction shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7 : 00--AM to 8 : 00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays . 14 . Conditional Use Permit No. 90-16 shall become null and void unless exercised within one (1) year of the date of final approval, or such extension of time as may be granted by the Planning Commission pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. 15 . Should a Traffic Impact Fee be adopted by the City Council, the applicant/property owner shall be responsible for paying such fee prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and/or final building permit approval . 16 . The developer will be responsible for the payment of any additional fees adopted in the upcoming Water Division Financial Master Plan. 17 . A review of the use shall be conducted within six (6) months of the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy and one year after issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. Said review shall be conducted by the Planning Commission at a duly noticed public hearing. The Planning Commission may add, delete or amend conditions of approval as necessary to resolve problems identified at such public hearing. If, at that time, there is any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, the Planning Commission may revoke Conditional Use Permit No . 90-16 . The applicant may request revised occupancy limits and/or hours of operation at the one-year review. 18 . Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall obtain approval of a Transportation Management Plan by the Director of Community Development . The Plan shall outline steps which the applicant will implement to reduce parking demand. Steps may include development of a ridesharing program, incentives to utilize public transportation, or other appropriate measures . Effectiveness of the program shall be evaluated at the six month review. Staff Report - 8/7/90 -8- (6677d) 5 . 0 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: 1 . The Planning Commission may approve Negative Declaration No . 90-13 and Conditional Use Permit No . 90-16 as requested by the applicant with findings and conditions of approval; or 2 . The Planning Commission may deny Conditional Use Permit No . 90-16 with findings . ATTACHMENTS• . 1 . Area map 2 . Attendance Figures 3 : Staff report dated .July 10, 1990 4 . Alternative Findings for Denial HS:LP:kjl Staff Report - 8/7/90 -9- (6677d) i J IGARFIECD ( I i 1 J ( AV L R2 R-2 �- R2' ,5_e.p,>•. R2 ..... M H EM,W9a ml :R2 C2 M I-qI i o R A-0 R2 �� 0 -' R2 N.�E nLK 5003 E]o0• a RA- F;R2 o E.S.r ra. R 2 Q . M- R 71 R2 R2 C 41 .; R 2 `- o R2 y 2 " R2 V R J(0)R2 01 b� R2 y I ULD TDwN SPECIFIC N 3 ,CLAY R2 ' PLAN(DISTRICT 1.) R2 5oou C xno,z C2-0-� ' AVE. of -• - R3 nn- D o R3 C2: R2-0-PD o1 : R4 I— -- R 2 _ff0 O O N••• R2-0_ - "v..ruy. 1¢\ '�•1 --• ___ _u un[rn sfso I_ _ C2-0 Rxa\?2,'(n[..,nt • N3oRle R2 Z� OwfR? 51 CD C2-0 „�M,.,a.,.....I � n n. RI .. R2. 1 r ' _ ; �I ro r r .r aC2 G •u•cu . •'e s:r:btir�••-'-,gwoco�xR2-0•PD::� .'3°.. s!!•s>5•E i ¢r'' R2'0 RI t- II3 !• r; RI �+ 3 NRLIAWS AVE. E/) 'c2 oKD•L 1 / xef�l.lxM, �g o�n ,p.'T [�E 595oZII R22 R2R2•o-CDC2-0-CDP- CD :R2 o PD-c R 2 o .+r L RI rf C4 I_ rptNTOwN '>50 1 ,..-cc C21 ,.5000: C F—C r T2] O CF-E-CD :.:,::.,, i R2-0-CD `emsI II (RI-0) �. 'RA E 2 QCF-E-CD ' I -CD o 01 ty+ LRI_o, '•� -o r N a cD o I R2-0 R2 R2 CF-E SP (FI P N -CD 0 VENICL �— (RI-a II I a(DI TRI T 101 _ CD R54 CUP90- 16/ND90- 13 J, HUNTINGTON BEACH xr 1'7}1'1;IP+tiq' HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION hyl ui+�F'a'ies' 31 • HUNTINGTON BEACH CHURCH OF RELIGIOUS SCIENCE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90-16 AVERAGE CURRENT ATTENDANCE JULY 19, 1990 AVERAGPS WEEKLY ATTENDANCE FALL, WINTER 8. 00 AM TO 7:00 PM TO SPRING TERMS 7:00 PM 10:00 Pm SUNDAY 1550 420 MONDAY 50 195 TUESDAY 30 265 WEDNESDAY 50 280 THURSDAY 50 175 FRIDAY 30 60 SATURDAY 95 25 8:00 AM TO 7:OO PM TO SUMMER 7:00 PM 10:00 PM SUNDAY 1455 325 MONDAY 40 120 TU13SDAY 35 140 WEDNESDAY 40 225 THURSDAY 55 115 FRIDAY 35 180 SATURDAY 80 20 MAJOR PROGRAM ATTENDANCE - 1990 DAY DATE TIME SPBAKER ATTENDANCE FRIDAY 2/24/90 7:00 TO JEAN HOUSTON 900 10:30 PM FRIDAY 3/30/90 7:00 TO PETER DANIELS 400 0.00 PM THURSDAY 5/24/90 7:00 TO ERYAN SWINNE 200 9:00 PM FRIDAY 6/1/90 7:00 TO ORDINATION 300 9:00 PM SUNDAY 6/17/90 6:00 TO ALAN COHEN 150 8:00 PM - HSCUP2 7/19/90 huntington beach department of community development STA f f REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Community Development J DATE: July 10 , 1990 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO . 90-16/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 90-13 (CONTINUED FROM JUNE 19 , 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING) APPLICANT: Huntington Beach Church of DATE ACCEPTED: Religious Science May 8, 1990 3090 Pullman St . Ste. B Costa Mesa, CA 92626 MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE: 60 Days from Final PROPERTY Huntington Beach Company Environmental Determination OWNER: c/o Huntington Seacliff 2134 Main St . Ste. 185 ZONE: OP-01-CD (Office Hunt . Beach, CA 92648 Professional-Combined with Oil Drilling-Civic District) REQUEST: To construct a 2-story, 42, 000 sq . ft . church with GENERAL PLAN: Office 1, 935 seat capacity, Professional including a one level parking structure and ACREAGE: 1. 62 acres joint use of parking at Seacliff Office Park. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Seacliff Office Park, northeast of Yorktown Ave . and Main Street 1 . 0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Approve Negative Declaration No . 90-13 and Conditional Use Permit No . 90-16 with findings and conditions of approval . 2 . 0 GENERAL INFORMATION: This item was continued from the June 19 , 1990 Planning Commission meeting beause only four Commissioners were present on June 19 . It was determined that because of the scope of the project , a public hearing before the full Planning Commission would be appropriate. Staff has received no new information since the last meeting . 3 . 0 ANALYSIS: The Planning Commission has requested that the proposed project also be analyzed as if it were being converted to an office use. At current parking ratios (1 space per 300 square feet) , office use 1� -5 A-F M-23C of the building would require 143 spaces . At proposed ratios pursuant to Code Amendment No . 88-12 ( 1 space per 250 square feet) the building would require 172 spaces . A total of 164 spaces are provided on the church site . . If- the lower (subterranean) section of the building totalling 6, 009 square feet were utilized as storage area upon conversion to office use, it would be possible to reduce the required parking count to 154 using the proposed ratio of 1/250 . The proposed'. building would conform to all applicable zoning standards for the Office Professional zone if it were converted to office use . The requirements as to setbacks , building height, percentage of landscaping, etc . are the same for a church as for an office building . As can be seen from the zoning matrix in the June 19 staff report, all aspects of the building are in conformance with the code. Although joint use of parking with Seacliff Office Park would not be appropriate for an office use, a reciprocal access agreement with Seacliff Office Park would be necessary to obtain access to the site from Yorktown Avenue or Main Street . At the June 19 Planning Commission meeting, staff distributed a handout which suggested modification of one condition of approval and addition of three conditions . These are as follows : MODIFY: 3 . (d) The applicant and the owner of Seacliff Office Park shall record a covenant which guarantees that the office parking lot (481 spaces) will be available for use by the church after 6 : 00 PM on weeknights and from 8 : 00 AM to 9 : 00 PM on weekends . Said covenant shall remain in effect for the life of the church use on the site. The covenant shall be approved as to form and content by the City Attorney' s office and the Department of Community Development . The covenant may be amended or rescinded only after approval by the City and property owners . ADD: 19 . A review of the use shall be conducted within six (6) months of the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. Said review shall be conducted by the Planning Commission at a duly noticed public hearing . The Planning Commission may add, delete or amend conditions of approval as necessary to resolve problems identified at such public hearing . If, at that time, there is any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, -the Planning Commission may revoke Conditional Use Permit No . 90-16 . Staff Report - 7/10/90 -2- (6207d) ADD : 20 . The maximum number of users of the building at any time shall be as follows : Sunday - 1, 935 per service Monday through Friday: 8 : 00 AM to 6 : 00 PM - 75 6 : 00 PM to 10 : 00 PM - 300 . Saturday - 8 : 00 AM to 9 : 00 PM - 200 Should the applicant wish to increase the number of users , an amendment to Conditional Use Permit No . 90-16 shall be approved by the Planning Commission. ADD: 21 . Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall obtain approval of a Transportation Management Plan by the Director of Community Development . The Plan shall outline steps which the applicant will implement to reduce parking demand. Steps may include development of a ridesharing program, incentives to utilize public transportation, or other appropriate measures . Effectiveness of the program shall be evaluated at the six month review. Condition No . 3 is modified because a recorded covenant which guarantees that the office parking lot will be available to the church for joint use of parking is required by Section 9602(c) of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code . The added conditions 19 t-hrough 21 allow the Planning Commission to closely monitor the church use due to its proximity to existing residences , and to make modifications to their action if deemed necessary at a six month review. The proposed occupancy limit reflects the narrative submitted by the church, and ensures that use of the building will not conflict with normal operating hours of the office park. Finally, a Transportation Management Plan is suggested because the applicant proposes to use every available space on the subject site and in the office park. By reducing the church' s parking demand through ridesharing or other methods, it is less likely that a conflict will occur should another user of the office park wish to park at the site during church hours . ATTACHMENT: 1 . Staff report dated June 19 , 1990 2 . Handouts from 6/19/90 : a . Additional conditions b. Environmental Board letter HS:LP: kla Staff Report - 7/10/90 -3- (6207d) huntington beach department of community` development( sTaFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Community Development DATE: June 19 , 1990 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90-16/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 90-13 APPLICANT: Huntington Beach Church of DATE ACCEPTED: Religious Science May 8 , 1990 3090 Pullman St . Ste. B Costa Mesa, CA 92626 MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE: 60 Days from Final PROPERTY Huntington Beach Company Environmental Determination OWNER: c/o Huntington Seacliff 2134 Main St . Ste. 185 ZONE: OP-01-CD (Office Hunt . Beach, CA 92648 Professional-Combined with Oil Drilling-Civic District) REOUEST: To construct a 2-story, 42, 000 sq . ft . church with GENERAL PLAN: Office 1, 935 seat capacity, Professional including a one level parking structure and ACREAGE: 1. 62 acres joint use of parking at Seacliff Office Park. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Seacliff Office Park, northeast of Yorktown Ave. and Main Street 1 . 0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Approve Negative Declaration No . 90-13 and Conditional Use Permit No. 90-16 with findings and conditions of approval . 2 . 0 GENERAL INFORMATION: Conditional Use Permit No. 90-16 is a request to construct a two-story, 42, 000 square foot church with a 1, 935 seat sanctuary pursuant to Section 9630 .0 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. The request also includes a one-level subterranean parking structure under the building, and the joint use of the surface parking at Seacliff Office Park. Since the time of the original submittal, the applicant has proposed that the number of seats in the church be reduced from 2, 000 to 1, 935 in order to accommodate all required parking on the Seacliff Office Park site . A-F M-23C A � , 7 f 3 . 0 SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS: North and East of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential ZONE: R2-0-PD (Medium Density Residential- Combined with Oil-Planned Development) LAND USE : Residential (Pacific Ranch) South and We§t of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION : Office Professional ZONE : OP-O-CD (Office Professional-Combined with Oil-Civic District) LAND USE: Seacliff Office Park 4 . 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect ' at this time, the Department of Community Development advertised draft Negative Declaration No . 90-13 for a twenty-one (21) day review and comment period prior to the hearing date, and no comments , either verbal or written were received . The staff, in its initial study of the project, has recommended that a negative declaration be issued. Prior to any action on Conditional Use Permit No . 90-16 , it is necessary for the Planning Commission to review and act on Negative Declaration No . 90-13 . 5 . 0 COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable . 6 . 0 REDEVELOPMENT STATUS: Not applicable. 7 . 0 SPECIFIC PLAN: Not applicable . .a . 0 SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE: Not applicable. 9 . 0 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD: The proposed church is located within a -CD (Civic District) zoning suffix, which requires that new structures be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board. The Board reviewed the appicant ' s plans , colors and materials on May 17, 1990, to determine their compatibility with the surrounding office park and residential uses . The Board voted 3 to 0 to recommend approval of the project to the Planning Commission with the following conditions : 1 . Any changes on the proposed elevations should be referred back to the Design Review Board for review and approval . 2 . The landscaping and irrigation plans shall be approved by the Design Review Board prior to issuance of building permits . 3 . Any future change of use on the site should be reviewed and approved by the Design -Review Board. Staff Report - 6/19/90 -2- (6097d) 10 . 0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS : a . Project Description: The Church of Religious Science currently holds services at the Seacliff Shopping Center, as approved by the Planning Commission in 1983 . The congregation' s growth, however, has necessitated new facilities . The proposed, project is located at the northeast corner of Seacliff Office Park.' The site is currently undeveloped except for oil wells , which will be abandoned prior to construction of the church. Access to the site is from Main Street and Yorktown Avenue via the Seacliff Office parking lot . The church proposes to construct a new 42,.000 square foot church building and subterranean parking structure, and to utilize Seacliff Office Park' s existing parking spaces . This joint use of parking i's further discussed below. The proposed two-story building includes a 1, 935 seat sanctuary, classrooms , multi-use rooms , offices , a bookstore and small chapel . In addition to 53 surface parking spaces , 111 spaces will be provided in a one-level subterranean structure. An existing 6 foot high to 14 foot high slump block wall separates the site from adjacent residences and carports at Pacific Ranch, and is proposed to remain. The church facility is to be used primarily on Sundays , at 9 : 00 AM and 11 : 00 AM services . It is also estimated that 75 people will use the building weekdays (8 : 00 AM to 6 : 00 PM) and 300 people will use the building weeknights (6 : 00 PM to 10 : 00 PM) . On Saturdays, approximately 200 people are anticipated to use the building from 8 : 00 AM to 9 : 00 PM. The following is a zoning conformance matrix which compares the proposed project with the development standards of Article 920 (Office Professional) , Article 960 (Parking and Landscaping) and Article 963 (Unclassified Uses) . Section Issue Required Proposed 9200 .4 Min. Parcel Size 10, 000 sq. ft . 70, 718 sq. ft . 9200 . 5 Max. Bldg . Height 3 stories, but 2 stories, max. 38 ft . not to exceed 38 ft . 9200 . 6 Setbacks Min. 5 ft . Min. 32 ft . Max. 75 ft . Staff Report - 6/19/90 -3- ( 6097d) Section Issue Required Proposed 9603 Stall Dimensions (Surface) Standard 9 ft . x 19 ft . 9 ft . x 19 - ft . Aisle Dimension 27 ft . 27 ft . (Surface) 9604 Compact- Parking Size 8 ft . x 15 ft . 8 ft . x 15 ft . . Percentage Max. 40% 19% of surface, 17% of total on-site 9605 . 1 Parking Structure Stalls 8 . 5 ft . x 18 ft . 9 ft . x 19 ft . Aisles 26 ft . 26 ft . . Slopes 5% (w/parking) 0 10% (w/o parking) 10% 9606 No . of Parking 1 per 3 seats parking struct . - 111 Spaces = 645 surface - 53 office park 481 Total 645 9608 Landscaped Area 8% of net site 7, 169 sq. ft . (10 . 1%) = 5 , 657 sq. ft . 9630 .0 Landscape Area 10% of parking 7, 169 sq. ft . in Parking Lot area = 4 , 975 sq. ft . b. Geological Concerns : The site is within the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone, denoting that an earthquake fault may run through the site. In accordance with State law, a thorough geology study must be completed prior to issuance of building permits, and all recommended mitigation measures , including setbacks and methods of building construction, must be adhered to . Evidence of faulting may require redesign of the site and will require the project to be resubmitted to the Planning Commission for additional review. c . Parking : The applicant is requesting joint use of parking with Seacliff .Office Park, in accordance with Section 9602 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. The Planning Commission may grant a reduction in the total number of parking spaces required by the sum of separate uses when it can be shown that the various uses have divergent needs in terms of daytime versus nighttime hours, or weekday versus weekend hours . Approval is subject to the following considerations : 1 . The maximum distance between the building and the nearest point of the parking facility shall be 250 feet . Staff Report - 6/19/90 -4- (6097d) 2 . The applicant shall demonstrate that no conflict will occur in the operating hours and demands for different uses . 3 . Evidence of an agreement. for such joint use shall be provided by proper legal instrument, approved as to form by the City Attorney, to be recorded a-nd filed prior to issuance of building permits . The distance from the church to the nearest point of the parking lot at Seacliff Office Park is approximately 50 feet . The primary use of the building will be on weekends and weeknights , as opposed to weekdays for the office complex. The weekday users of the church building (approximately 75 people) can be parked on the church site, without need for joint use parking with the offices . The Huntington Beach Company, owners of both Seacliff Office Park and the church site, have agreed to the proposed joint use parking agreement (see attached letter dated May 31, 1990) , and a formal agreement will be recorded prior to issuance of building permits . d . Noise: Noise impacts generated by the number of people using the site on Sunday mornings may affect adjacent residents at Pacific Ranch. Several factors , however, tend to mitigate these impacts . The main entryway to the church faces southwest, away from most residences , and. toward the offices and parking lot . Residences to the north and west will be buffered by a 6 foot wall , carports and drive aisles , and will be a minimum of 105 feet from the exterior of the church building . Residences to the east and southeast are buffered by a 6 foot to 14 foot wall, and distances of approximately 75 feet from the exterior of the building . Staff is recommending conditions of approval to require that the parking structure incorporate textured, non-squeal surfaces, and to prohibit outdoor music, bells , chimes , public address systems , etc. e. Future Uses : The proposed church building will be designed for eventual conversion to an office. It is architecturally compatible with the surrounding office buildings , and will provide enough on-site parking to accommodate conversion to 41, 000 square feet of office use (at 250 square feet per parking space, in accordance with proposed Code Amendment No . 88-12) . The Design Review Board would review and approve any such future modifications . 11. 0 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Negative Declaration No . 90-13 and Conditional Use Permit No . 90-16 with the following findings and conditions of approval : Staff Report - 6/19/90 -5- (6097d) FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90-16 : 1 . The location, site layout, and design of the proposed church properly adapts the proposed structure to streets , driveways , and other adjacent structures and uses in a harmonious manner . The building is compatible with adjoining offices and is oriented away from residential developments . 2 . The combination and relationship of one proposed use to another on site, are properly integrated . 3 . The access to and parking for the proposed church does not create an undue traffic problem because adequate parking will be available for joint use . CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL : 1 . The site plan, floor plans and elevations received and dated June 6 , 1990, shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following modification: a . Surface compact spaces shall have minimum 15 foot long paved surface . 2 . Prior to submittal for building permits , the applicant/owner shall complete the following : a . Depict all utility apparatus, such as but not limited to backflow devices and Edison transformers, on the site plan. They shall be prohibited in the front and exterior yard setbacks unless properly screened by landscaping or other method as approved by the Community Development Director. b. Floor plans shall depict natural gas stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters , and central heating units; and low-volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets . C. Elevations shall depict colors and building materials as approved by the Design Review Board on May 17, 1990 . d. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened from any view. Said screening shall be architecturally compatible with the building in terms of materials and colors . If screening is not designed specifically into the building, a rooftop mechanical equipment plan must be submitted showing screening and must be approved. e. If outdoor lighting is included, energy savings lamps shall be used. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties and shall be noted on the site plan and elevations . Staff Report - 6/19/90 -6- (6097d) t f . A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer . This analysis shall include on-site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading, chemical and fill properties , foundations , retaining walls , streets , and utilities . g . The site is within the Alquist-Priolo region and must be investigated for evidence of faulting prior to issuance of any permits . Evidence of faulting will require the entire project to be re-reviewed by the Planning Commission. The completed geotechnical report , including recommendations for the acceleration to be used for designing the structures on the site, or a statement that the adopted Uniform Building Code is adequate for the seismic design of the structures on the site, shall be submitted to the Public Works Department . The Public Works Department will obtain an independent analysis of the completed geologic report . The cost of this analysis will be' paid by the applicant . When the report has been amended to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department, the City will file the report with the State Geologist . Construction drawings along with calculations and the approved geologic report shall be submitted to the Department of Community Department to complete the permit plan review. h. The site plan shall include (or reference page) all conditions of approval imposed on the project printed verbatim. 3 . Prior to issuance of building permits , the applicant/owner shall complete the following : a . A Landscape Construction Set must be submitted to the Departments of Community Development and Public Works and must be approved. The Landscape Construction Set shall include a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State Licensed Landscape Architect and which includes all proposed/existing plant materials ( location, type, size, quantity) , an irrigation plan, a grading plan, an approved site plan, and a copy of the entitlement conditions of approval . The landscape plans shall be in conformance with Section 9608 and Article 963 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. The set must be approved by both departments prior to issuance of building permits . b. A grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and it must be approved (by issuance of a grading permit) . A plan for silt control for all water runoff from the property during construction and initial operation of the project may be required if deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works . c . All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid. Staff Report - 6/19/90 -7- ( 6097d) :r d. The subject property shall enter into a joint use of parking agreement between the subject site and adjacent Seacliff Office Park. A copy of the legal instrument shall be approved by the Community Development Department and the City Attorney as to form and content and, when approved, shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder . A copy shall be filed with the Department of Community Development . 4 . Fire Department Requirements are as follows : a . An automatic fire sprinkler system and fire alarm system shall be approved and installed pursuant to Fire Department regulations . b. Service roads and fire lanes , as determined by the Fire Department , shall be posted and marked. C . Fire access lanes shall be maintained . If fire lane violations occur and the services of the Fire Department are required, the applicant will be liable for expenses incurred . d. Two on-site fire hydrants shall be provided at locations specified by the Fire Department prior to combustible construction. e. The applicant shall meet all applicable local , State and Federal Fire Codes , Ordinances , standards and specifications . f . Development shall meet all local and State regulations regarding installation and removal of all underground storage tanks . g . City Specifications 422 and 429, "Oil Well Abandonment Process" and "Methane Overlay District Requirements" must be adhered to . 5 . Hours of operation shall be limited to Monday through Friday, 8 : 00 AM to 10 : 00 PM; Saturday, 8 : 00 AM to 9 : 00 PM; Sunday use shall be limited to two (2) services . Other use of the building on Sunday shall be ancillary only. 6 . Seating in the sanctuary shall be limited to 1, 935 seats (a maximum of 2, 902 . 5 linear feet of pew seating) . 7 . There shall be no use of outdoor bells , chimes, public address systems, music, or other source sound which may disturb adjacent residents . Staff Report - 6/19/90 -8- (6097d) S . The . p.arking structure shall incorporate a textured, non-squeal surface . 9 . The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department . 10 . All building spoils , such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them.. 11 . Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be completed prior to final inspection. 12 . During construction, the applicant shall : a . Use water trucks or sprinkler systems in all areas where vehicles travel to keep damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site; b. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day; C. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts . 13 . Construction shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7 : 00 AM to 8 : 00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays . 14 . Conditional Use Permit No . 90-16 shall become null and void unless exercised within one (1) year of the date of final approval, or such extension of time as may be granted by the Planning Commission pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. 15 . Should a Traffic Impact Fee be adopted by the City Council, the applicant/property owner shall be responsible for paying such fee prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and/or final building permit approval . 16 . The applicant/property owner shall be responsible for paying the Park and Recreation Fees in effect at the time the final map is accepted by City Council or issuance by building permits, whichever occurs first . 17 . The developer will be responsible for the payment of any additional fees adopted in the upcoming Water Division Financial Master Plan. 18 . Landscape irrigation system shall be designed and constructed to include a separate water line for the use of reclaimed water subject to Water Department approval . Staff Report - 6/19/90 -9= (6097d) 12 . 0 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The Planning Commission may deny Conditional .Use Permit No . 90-16 with findings . ATTACHMENTS : 1 . Area map 2 . Narrative 3 . Negative Declaration No . 90-13 4 . Site plans , elevations and floor plans dated June 6 , 1990 5 . Design Review Board minutes dated May 17 , 1990 6 . Letter from Huntington Beach Company dated May 31, 1990 7 . Letter from applicant dated June 5 , 1990 HS :LP: kla V` Staff Report - 6/19/90 -10- (6097d) I • i jI • I (GARFIELD I I I I / / _ I I AVE.I L 1. ' R2 R2 � R,2• R2 � ;RA-0 F CI - ad a) } M M H �4 W:] N L(Ni1�Vi0..... ' o Mi C2 m 1 MI-A 0 o RA-0 R2 ' ,,L + W1 _ I 90 N. C N, 53004 , C 4``•R2 s y rn. Q Do cr- >i.. "MI-A-0 R RA- R2 w� R2 C4! R2 R2 R2 r R 2 " R2 'a : „ V � _ 7� . �. .ai R MI xrr ��D)R2-OI R2 ,_`+ OLD TOWN SPECIFIC �� I 3 ,R2 ! PLAN(DISTRICT 1.) R2 • .soo lz C-znolz-I I CLAY ,•. - AVE. I C2-0-CD y','s.;.n:e ;:'::i e> �„ o `.• (r:E:;::-..��) J •cr..r5 `� o•. R3 x>.- D o I"' R3 cz: Ra-0:PD I R2 Owl., WR2 `` q, ry R4 ' `IN fr; R2-0 '(; q0 0 R2 N LINE iN 39,0 \q ,`.C,I,I -j -'Rj 290 RI AVE ` ry _ C2-0-CD C2_0 „r: .. „;.:.. ::\ �I`III CIL LIANO R G21 N�- F N N.4.I, R 2 e•I .:atir... ...pr.oNco(XR2-0-PD::�ar'-; W son 3 t- :a-'- •:� R2-0 RI , RI WILLIAMS •Cx'OKA�„ 1• ' - '_% •n "' 3 CTR.A950 LLIANS AVE ) 3 21 ( oeaoo'�• �,>�xwsyt.An,, .¢d-,-. •:.:�� W>�wa:' I +1 W �I — e,s.L'. 1=" R2 —R2 R2 :.:OO R2-0-CD 1' �' oC2-0-CD OP- �D 'R2 0 PD-C q R 2 no IL O x.a .I r•: ..N o I `. 4•i cxao ^I I,R2 +� C I-. vORN TTVN I ...- —.- AVE. 14r . d >„se ni'oi`cnie s.,. 'i r .I C2� — R'�-oR2 _o C F C f _ CF-E-CD :::I::.:::1 R2-O-CD "' i" I I I G OJ o -RA(RI-0) . i 9CelC IN Ill C2 �s � vr.,y I �CF-E-CD - o-` -CD o R2-0 R2 R2 CF_ VN E (R1-D) SP I� P N II Co CD 0 I j VCNICL 1-- , w1-a (DI RI T O) O (I ... . 11 8 CD-�` I II -cD-O Vl R'4 CUP90- 16/ND90- 13 HUNTINGTON BEACH :..•i1)'�^.$ii HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION Project Narrative., Huntington Beach t nil rh of:R li7ious iS i4nce In February of 1983, the Huntington BE:a.c h Flar ning Cchr';mission approved the es- tablishment of a'church facility within the SeaCliff Shopping Center (Conditional Use Per- mit No. 83-2). The Huntington Beach Church of Religious Science occupies approximately 22,000 square feet and includes a 900 seat sanctuary, a chapel, a bookstore, class rooms, ad- ministration offices and counseling facilities. It serves an active congregation of ap- proximately 3,000 people and a visitor mailing list in excess of 16,000 people, predominately comprised of Huntington Beach residents. The church is primarily utilized on Sunday, with three morning services held at approximately 8:00, 9:45 and 11:30. For several years, the church has been "bursting at the seams" in its current facility. The inadequate size of the sanctuary has compelled the church to move from two over-flow- ing services to three highly attended ones. Unfortunately, this third service, which occurs at 11:30, impacts the parking for patrons of the SeaCliff Shopping Center. The church's tremendous success in spiritually serving the community of Huntington Beach has forced it to look for larger facilities. The new facilities must satisfy the following four conditions: 1. For the continued success of the Huntington Beach Church of Religious Science, it must remain near its current location. Churches are as demographically sensitive as com- mercial businesses. Historically, churches struggle and sometimes fail when they move Attachment A ... .._....... a significant distance from their current location. The citizens of Huntington Beach who at- tend the church strongly advocate a relocation,near it3 currant Sits. 2. Huntington Beach Church of Religious Science must occupy larger facilities. The three Sunday services currently provided by the'chu_-ch barely az, ommodate its burgeoning membership. Therefore, for operational and growth reasons, the church chooses to return to two Sunday services.Two Sunday services will greatly diminish the parking impact in the neighborhood, simply because the parking time involved is reduced by one-third. The proposed new facility will house a sanctuary holding 2,000 people, thereby adeWately ac- commodating the congregation in two services. 3. Huntington Beach Church of Religious Science strongly adheres to a policy of en- vironmental and economic responsibility. A 2,000 seat church necessitates a parking lot of approximately six acres. Covering six acres of earth with asphalt does not respect the resources of the church or the city, especially when that asphalt would be maximally used for only three to four hours per week. Joint-use parking and functionally integrated mixed- use projects are a must in our intensely developed Southern California home land. 4. A portion of the success of the Huntington Beach Church of Religious Science comes from its integration into a commercial facility. Our church members are proud to be contributing members of-the business mainstream of Huntington Beach and to have their church home located in a viable commercial center. The new facility is designed for later conversion into an office building, including adequate on-site parking to meet city regula- tions. The dual utilization affords flexibility for the church and the city by accommodating their respective needs in the future. Attachment A ( Cont . ) PROPOSED CHURCH STAT ST I 1 . ESTIMATED MJMBER OF PERSONS IN BUILDING: A. Weekdays : Sam - 6pm 75 persons . 6pm - 10pm 300 persons . B. Saturday : 8am - 6pm 200 persons . 6pm - 9pm 200 persons . C. Sunday 9am Service 1600-2000 persons max . 11am Service 1200- 1600 persons max . 2. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC (VEHICULAR TRIPS/DAY) : A. Weekdays : 8am - 6pm 75 6pm - 10pm 100 B . Saturday : 8am - 6pm 67 6pm - 9pm 67 C. Sunday 8am - 1pm 1000- 1200 3. PROJECT NOISE Any noise produced by the project would be auto generated . Auto noise increase for several hours on. sunday , but will actually be less intense than the surrounding traffic the remainder of the week . The adjacent condominiums have approx . 170 carports within 100 FT. of the site on the north , west & east . The office park on the southwest has over 50 parking spaces adjacent to the site and a major access driveway . Attachment C , J� lie CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH` • INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION.:. HUNTINGTON BEACH - - To Laura Phillips From ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES Associate Planner SECTION Subject ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION Date May 16 ,. 1990 FORM NO. 90-13 Applicant : Church of Religous Science Request : To construct a 38 , 000 square foot church. Location: . Northeast corner of Yorktown Avenue 'and Main Street (Seacliff Office Park) . Background The Environmental Assessment Committee has reviewed the environmental information form noted above and has determined that a negative declaration may be filed for the project . In view of this , a draft negative declaration was prepared and was published in the Daily Pilot and posted in the Office of the City Clerk for a twenty-one (21) day public review period commencing May 25 , 1990 and ending June 15 , 1990 . If any comments regarding the draft negative declaration are received, you will be notified immediately. Recommendation The Environmental Resources Section recommends that the Planning Commission approve _Negative Declaration No . 90-13 finding that the proposed project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment . r Mitigation Measures X The attached mitigating measures will reduce potential environmental effects resulting from the project and are recommended as conditions of approval . Respectfully submitted, Julie Osugi Planning Aide MJC: kj 1 (5807d) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 90-13 1 . Name of Proponent Huntington Beach Church of Religious Science Address c/o Tom Willard 3090 Pullman Street, Suite B Costa Mesa, California 92616 Phone Number (714) 557-4699 2. Date Checklist Submitted for Review May 16, 1990 rr 3. Concurrent Entitlement(s) Conditional Use Permit No. 90-16 4. Project Location NE Corner of Seacliff Office Park (NE of Yorktown and Main) . 5. Project Description 2 Story, 38,000 square feet church over 50,000 square feet subterranean parking structure. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of answers are included after each subsection.) Yes Maybe No 1 . Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or changes in geologic substructures? _ _ X r b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? X C. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? _ _ X d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? _ _ X e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? _ X f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? _ _ X g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? _ X Yes Maybe No DISCUSSION: The Project is located in the Alquist—Priolo Special Studies Zone. A geologist's report will be required prior to issuance of .building permits in accordance with state law. Mitigation Measure No. 5 requires compliance wilh all recommended setbacks and constrcution standards, and therefore, no significant adverse impacts are expected. The proposal will result in compaction and overcovering of the soil . However, the site has been previously graded and is presently used for oil operations. No adverse impacts are anticipated. Minor short—term wind erosion may occur during construction. However, Mitigation Measures No. 8 requiring dust control measures will reduce impacts to a level of insignificance. 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? _ X _ b. The creation of objectionable odors? _ _ X C. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? _ X DISCUSSION: Minor short term deterioration of local ambient air—quality may occur during construction as a result of construction equipment emmissions and dust. However, impacts are not considered significant and will .be further reduced by Mitigation Measure No. 8, which requires dust control and maintenance of equipment engines in proper tune. 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? X _ C. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? _ _ X d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? _ _ X e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? _ X f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? _ _ X g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? _ _ X h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? _ X i . Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? X Environmental Checklist —2— (5745d) v , � Yes Maybe No DISCUSSION: The site is not within the 100 year flood plain and does not drain directly to any natural body of water. Slight increases in surface runoff will occur due to overcovering of the site with impervious surfaces. The site plan should incorporate the maximum amount of landscape area feasible. Existing storm drains are adequate to accomodate increased runoff. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? _ _ X b. Reduction of the numbers of any mature, unique, rare or endangered species of plants? _ _ X C. Int,roduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the no 741 replenishment of existing species? _ _ X d. Reduction in acreage of an agricultural crop? _ _ X DISCUSSION: The site has been cleared of vegetation. No plants or animals will be affected. 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? _ _ X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? _ _ X C. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? _ _ X d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? _ _ X DISCUSSION: See Section 4 Discussion. 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? X b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? _ _ X DISCUSSION: The proposal will increase noise levels on the site. The gathering of 2000 people prior to and after services on Sunday (and presumably up to 4000 if services are closely scheduled) may adversely impact adjacent residences. Although the main building entry faces away from the residences, the new noise source will be noticeable. Possible measures which mitigate this impact are: Environmental Checklist —3— (5745d) Yes Maybe No 1 . An existing 6' high to 14' high wall currently exists around the perimeter of of the site, and will remain. 2. No outdoor music, chimes, bells, etc. should be permitted: 3. The parking structure should utilize textured, "non—squeal" surfaces. 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X _ DISCUSSION: The project will result in new light sources on the site. However, with Mitigation Measure No. 3 requiring directed lighting, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X DISCUSSION: The use is permitted in this zone subject to approval of the conditional use permit, and will be designed for future conversion to office use. 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? _ X b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? _ _ X 10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to oil , pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? _ _ X b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? _ _ X DISCUSSION: All oil wells on site will be abandoned in accordance with state and city regulations. 11 . Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? _ _ X 12. Housing. . Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? _ _ X 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? X b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new off—site parking? _ X C. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? — _ X d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? _ _ X Environmental Checklist —4— (5745d) Yes Maybe No e. Alterations. to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X DISCUSSION: The surrounding. arterials (Yorktown and Main) presently have sufficient capacity to to accommodate the'vehicle trips generated. The proposed project does not currently provide for adequate parking as required by the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. However, the applicant has agreed to institute a reciprocal access agreement with Seacliff Shopping Center and/or institute a carpool program to reduce parking demand. No significant impacts are anticipated. 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? _ _ X b. Police protection? _ _ X C. Schools? X d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? _ _ X f. Other governmental services? _ _ X 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? _ _ X b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing source of energy, or require the development of sources of energy? _ _ X 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? _ _ X b. Communication systems? _ _ X C. Water? X d. Sewer or septic tanks? _ _ X e. Storm water drainage? _ _ X f. Solid waste and disposal? _ _ X DISCUSSION: All utilities are available to the site. 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: Environmental Checklist —5— (5745d) s 1 Yes Maybe No a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? X DISCUSSION: All oil wells will be abandoned prior to issuance of building permits. Risks to health from earthquake hazards can be substantially mitigated. See No. 1 . 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? _ X 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X 20. Cultural Resources. tri a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? _ X b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? _ _ X C. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? _ _ X d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? _ X 21 . Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, sub— stantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? _ X b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short—term, to the disadvantage of long—term, environmental goals? (A short—term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long—term impacts will endure well into the future.) _ _ X C. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively consid— erable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small , but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) _ _ X d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? _ — X DISCUSSION: See #6 — Noise impacts. Environmental Checklist —6— (5745d) ------------ DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a, NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached . sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Date Si gna/ture v Revised: March, 1990 For: City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department Environmental Checklist —7— (5745d) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH STANDARD MITIGATING MEASURES 1 . Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units. 2. All building, spoils, such as unusable lumber, 'wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material , shall be disposed of at an offsite facility equipped to handle them. 3. If lighting is included in the parking lot and/or recreation area energy efficient lamps shall be used (e.g., high pressure sodium vapor, metal halide). All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage"onto adjacent properties. 4. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer. This analysis shall include on—site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations, retaining walls,* streets, and utilities. S. An engineering geologist shall be engaged to submit a report in compliance with the Alquist—Priolo special studies zone prior to issuance of building permits. All structures within this development shall be con— structed in compliance with the setbacks and g—factors as indicated by the geologist's report. Calculations for footings and structural members to withstand anticipated g—factors shall be submitted to the City for review prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a grading plan shall be submitted to the City's Department of Public Works. A plan for silt control for all water runoff from the property during construction and during initial operation of the project may be required by the Director of Public Works if deemed necessary. 7. Should any abandoned oil wells or tanks be encountered, the Fire Department shall be notified and current standards met as required by Article 15 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. Any abandonment of existing wells must be to current standards as well . 8. During cleaning, grading, earth moving or excavation, the applicant shall : a. Control fugitive dust by regular watering, paving construction roads, or other dust preventive measures. b. Maintain equipment engines in proper tune. 9. Construction shall be limited to Monday — Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. 10. Prior to initiation of construction, police and fire departments shall be notified and the departments shall be kept informed about duration and extent of construction throughout the process. 11 . All oil facilities within the boundaries of the development which are to be removed and abandoned, reabandoned or to remain must meet all existing requirements of the City of Huntington Beach and the State Division of Oil and Gas. Further protective measures may be required, depending upon the conditions and quality of the abandonments and reabandonments. Environmental Checklist —8— (5745d) s E%ISTINO 1 PACIFIC AAH04 1 \� COHOOMIMVM3 A' .A !l //"p' C.rparll }IL I�I1 I� }t III Y� �1 tk III V, 90 - ; PROJECT STATISTICS ;;tj It�.- DE P ,RTA^_ :T �, -- - 7 I SITE ZONE: OP-01-CD e1tP L COMMU IT`( VE PPA Gar°°r" x•s 1 SITE SIZE: 70.718 S.F. L v PROPOSED GILDING COVERAGE: - 22,06e S.F. 131%) PL I\I1�II� DIVI CHURCH \ LANDSCAPED AREA ALLOWABLE: ],169 S.F.I10.1X1 m1 1ri= m�,�rmT�rm IvmTn�, 1 \ � g� SITE 1 �•Vj PUBLIC OPEN SPACE: •11,000 S.F.111\I / Eelalln Parkln I (�— I I 7 1 FIRST FLOOR AREA: 20.972 S.F. SECOND FLOOR AREA: 15.850 S.F. O 1 LOWER LEVEL/NON-PARKING: 6,009 S.F. BUILDING TOTAL/CHURCH USE: 42.961 S.F. GARAGE AREA: e5.975 S.F. 111I � Al2-1 OCCUPANCY: 15.000 S.F. 5-2 OCCUPANCY: 26,B61 S.F. I O 1 I 8-1 OCCUPANCY: 45,975 S.F. ar•-� EXISTING SEACUFF sona Ma,. SANCTUARY SEATING: 2,000 Pera.7 i9 OFFICE PARK EXISTING IPA klnal Slnp ) PACIFIC RANCH 1 g Pac.. > CONDOMINIUMS I e I _ ' REQUIRED PARKING:113 1119 I I 1 Par 7 Se.la%2,000•667 Sp.... O 1 = PARKING ON GRADE: 50 Spa— PARK I ING IN GARAGE: 1t1 Spaces w I _ z F I I TOTAL PARKING ON CHURCH SITE: •164 Spaces U u MANS] N III ¢ 1 I ^I I t --PROPERTY PARKING SHARED W/OFFICE PARK: a61 Space• < r F �n Q I C1 I I I I I I I I I I 1111 1111�) J� TOTAL PARKING IMMED.AVAIL 645 Space. G o ` u-ti_ =: III I I I I I I;I l l l n l l l l l l l l l l l l(1 COMPACT PARKINGICHURCH SITE: 9 Sp...1 5%) _^ t= N COMPACT PARKING/OFFICE PARK: •100 Spa—at XI �u uU TOTAL COMPACT PARKING: •109 Spa—(17%) Svi O-i s Ellaling Parking_ 0- Us I:I ` II I I III i gW wW `-- w .I mN mN f0 t D 1f0 1-01 zO: -YORKTOWN AVENUE --�• / z<Oz-krr...nc7rnrr_rN U_3 7r mzi uze zz. A NEW FACILITY FOR HUNTINGTON BEACH PROJECT SITE LOCATION j CHURCH OF RELIGIOUS SCIENCE AND ADJACENT LAND USE .. r'. � �:i, ��•. !�,trr�.a, w q�..l�fr�A a�asaF�.4�t.6""emi�' . � .��'F.l"! 7f��.. �:t r' ! 9 v � sr::rt.• Nam:y �: a ' � •SAY. .i •` r4 i L.t 9 1� •,� :rt'S��?' �'�I NMI 'joA. A . _. 4 Sli IN Milli APPLICANT: ��• �'£"C' '1 '��?:. �__ Ism � �S^! wuu.A. a.n.•All,HUNTINGTON BEACH CHURCH OF RELJIGIOUS SCIENCET..in..Y.n..,a. Hanes Menser Architects AIA :H.ro... �� i�`,� 06 1990 $r DEPARTMENT 0"r COMMUNITY DEVEIOPR%(tvT It pLA!>INtNO D!ViSION CLASS RMS. OPEN TO. I SS 229 FT. MULTI-USE {k S� ` SANCTUARY MECHJELEC. ej t a' I ENTER BALCONY ,SEATING -.-- ..-USE I. • v I � COUNSELING a f I nlY EXIT �IT-- t OPEN TO LOBBY MUSIC CENTER HC - - ' , I ADMIN. II • HC MINISTERS ADMIN. UPPER LEVEL VIDEO FLOOR PLAN T ELEV CENTER II I TOTAL AREA:15,880 S.F. __. ..._� 2 19, TYP 2.13 ST.T?'P ORM i I I /USTDDIAN _ W P U W U Fir b J � \ u Oon F„ r ._D. F J ,T rl TYP. D P MULTI-USE U, \— BUILDING LINE ABOVE a_ MISC: MULTI-USE U I I I is o OR NY U U= z� 2" .t .KITCHEN O RFC, m5 ©5 )lO/D t GARAGE LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1116'-1'-O' z"W zN 1 MEW / =�,`o 3:z 1-- III STANDARD 1 MAIN <Oz 3 CHILDOCARE WOMEN LO@BY 0 UF2 OHi m PARKING SPACES 0I azn zz. 51,984 TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE aJn aJ ' <Sn JSn I A NEW FACILITY FOR JR.CHURCH; BOOKSTOflEE OV AR j/ GROUND LEVEL HUNTINGTON BEACH FLOOR PLAN CHURCH OF RELIGIOUS SCIENCE - - TOTAL AREA: 20,972 � � 3 1I %-ECEIVED 061990, MINI +1 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT p C C C I C �• itAMPDOWN C I' a PUNNING DIVISION TO GARAGE _ �tp' tiS ME EOUP. C 1,ol O S� ' C TVP.coMPAGT TIP.CAR OVEA/WIG 1301 C E • WN. TIP.STD., • ,I 75-0" NC O 27'-0" Cf6-6 �u • N gNC •I El • tie' w U = o I • W u / cl •J ❑ y I ❑ N < 0 o b �/ • v �� o+ Z El 0 D;: 'x^ J o = u< l m eDEl El El u Uz U= U^ U� <W WrW- .. - mt z w=N z zo„ Qoz 30- N;i 0?- SEE SNT.2 FOR OTHER NOTES AND INFORMATION 7, �OHS mz.zz. 44 STANDARD SUPPLEMENTARY SITE PLAN 9 COMPACT 53 TOTAL PARKING SPACES CRITICAL DIMENSIONS SCAIEVsa--T-D" 2A 13 I: Y ALUMINUM STOREFRONT - ITi1`'{?,,:�::.�.;; ;;•;�:`'; 061990 METAL COLUMN COVERS DARK OR REFLECTED GLASS i I ;. E05nNG PERIMETER WALLS BYONDOFTME�' 1; DEPAR Sj[ FF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I / 'PLASTER-TYPE'FINSN Ii I O yx 0 6I1A I •+ - .-� .. �'y' • A' � v®r"k, p A. rs e r, n 1 EAST VIEW WEST/ENTRY VIEW ` FIN GRADE C BLDG.SITE PERIMETER l I 1 f ::. I III II I c 4 'po Y Ilk NORTH VIEW SOUTH/ENTRY VIEW EXTERIOR BUILDING ELEVATIONS w U SCALE:f/16'-I'-6' � Z Is J W u U � N (fin 0n J� Gw to f NDE J JJ;;—SLETUN uGs E v—•�^v •yt lI C�. .t._-4 ��t a©orv✓ SANCTUARY SPACE l U Uu WN3f li •— JAJAJ J J J J J J J J J JJ J RGROUNDJFRE II I I MUSIC CENTERF-ON u�°y aZ^ZZ ate„ate= ax«JX« i SITE SECTION (NORTH—SOUTH) SCALE U16' T-D' A NEW FACILITY FOR I HUNTINGTON BEACH ' CHURCH OF RELIGIOUS SCIENCE 4 I C Sr 3< i B . CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO . 90-16 : i Applicant : Church of Religious Science . Request : Review elevations for 38 , 000 square foot church building in D District . Location: Northeast corner of Yorktown and Main (Seacliff Office Park) . Action: Recommendation to the Planning Commission. Hal Simmons , staff planner , displayed a site plan, floor plan, colored, elevations and a material-color palette . DARYL SMITH MADE A MOTION TO RECOMMEND THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVE THE PROJECT AS PROPOSED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS : 1. ANY CHANGES ON THE PROPOSED ELEVATIONS SHOULD BE REFERED BACK TO THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. 2 . THE LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION DRAWINGS WOULD BE APPROVED BY THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT. 3 . ANY FUTURE CHANGE OF USE ON THE PROPOSED SITE SHOULD BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD. HOWARD ZELEFSKY SECONDED. THE MOTION PASSED 3-0 . KIRK KIRKLAND MADE A MOTION AT 4 :30 P.M. TO ADJOURN THE MEETING TO MAY 24 AT 3 :30 P.M. DARYL SMITH SECONDED. THE MOTION PASSED 3-0 . P DRB Minutes 5/l?/�0 -2- (5893d) C Huntington C � Beach Company C 2120 Main Street,"260, Huntington Beach,California 92648.2499 (714) 960-4351 FAX 714-969 -3659 .. May 31, 1990 Proposed Parking Lease Church of Religious Science Church of Religious Science 2205 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 Gentlemen: The purpose of this letter is to set forth our intentions with respect to a proposed Parking Lease for a sufficient number of parking spaces during the evenings.and on weekends in and around the Sea Cliff Office Park in conjunction with the acquisition by the Church of Religious Science of Huntington each, Inc. (the "Church"), from the Huntington Beach Company ("HBCo") of approximately 1.46 acres of unimproved real property located north of Yorktown Avenue and east of Main Street in the City of Huntington Beach, Orange County, California, pursuant to that certain Option Agreement dated March 16, 1990. The par-Lies currently Intend that the final terms and conditions of such an agreement be conditioned upon and based, among other things, primarily on the final requirements of the City of Huntington Beach for approval of a Conditional Use Permit for the Church to develop the 1.46 acres, and that the parking spaces be principally located in the Seacliff Office Park, with additional spaces possibly being available in the Seacliff Village Shopping Center.. Neither the Church nor HBCo shall be bound by the terms of this letter with regards to the proposed lease, nor shall they consider obligating themselves to one another with respect thereto until a written agreement for the parking of vehicles has been mutually agreed upon and executed by the parties. If the foregoing correct)y indicates your understanding, please note your approval by executing in the space provided for hereunder and returning the Duplicate Original of this letter-for our files. Huntington Beach Company, a California corporation By: Understood and.Approved XTORMYlN-FACT thiso/ day of , 1990. Church of Religious Science of Huntington Beach, Inc., a nonprofit corporation By: �- I � .n y a Hanes Menser Architects AIA Incorporated seacliff office park 21 20 main street suite 200 huntington beach california 92648 (714)536-2009 fax (714)536-6391 June 05 , 1990 City of Hunt i ngton reach )) Department of Community Development - , EB 2000 Main Street 7g90 Huntington Beach , CA 92648 L'b-PARThI;NT OF Attn : Laura Phi I I ips Cor""V'UNITY Dsv_,o!DjgENT Re : CUP-90- 16 Church of Religious Science 'I VISION Dear Laura : This letter will authorize you to reduce the number of seats requested in CUP-90- 16 from 2000 to 1935 in order to accomodate all required parking within the Seacliff Office Park site . W-- understand that this adjustment will preclude the necessity of a variance for offsite parking or a carpooling plan . ARCHITECT APPLICANTS AGENT FOR CHURCH OF RELIGIOUS SCIENCE 1 r TM,-PNI r r :li•awn+- r� r W�;'e �am- Qs1,L . •^ .. •vim ................ h A" :) •� _ 16 .�v.:•mil''''.:"T..,::-: Environmental Board : city of Huntington Beach P . O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 city of Huntington. Beach Planning collunission 2000 Mlain Street L,. I ntl_I1gt01-i aeac'c1, CA 92648 Gent•1 an,en i The Environmental ,Board has reviewed the Environmental information form No . 90-13 (as admendsd by personal communication with Laura Phillips) and has the following comments, 1 . We disagree with the' findings on Item 13 , Transportation and circulation. The creation of a 1935 seat sanctuary will create a definit(- impact on traffic circulation and parking. 2 . A total of 645 parking spaces are required by City code. The project N•rzll create a total of 13-8 planned spaces, with the deficit being made. up from the Seacliff Business Park. we are concerned that if the nature of 2 the Business park changes in the future such that these spaces are no longer available, a severe parking deficit will. result. The Board recommends a more detailed study be performed by City staff can the traffic and parking impacts of this project, and than legal guaranteeE be developed to assure no future parking problems will arise. Sincerely, Roy Richardson, Chairman Environmental. . Board Doan Sie 1 d H oc C itteO" Chairman'. - Jeff Eden , ozami e member , Catherine i Co mmittee member 1L C S .Y ! S ~r"• L.� .:.per. +4 �•N r r r 3 \f - A. � w:l.Y f Y:7:'h, ': '7-•..: 7 ! l _ -a r a.1 t yt, I •i a - 4 - Fce ti- v, l �1 '4- - T _ 0_ 2 r �i-CY rh. .J. r•�.- ITEM B-5 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 90-13 LETTER FROM ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD Comment 1 The creation of a 1 , 935 seat sanctuary will create . a definite impact on traffic circulation and parking . Response 1 The City Department of Public Works has reviewed the proposed project and does not feel that the project traffic will create a significant adverse impact . Main Street and Yorktown Avenue presently have the capacity . to accommodate the vehicle trips generated . Also of note, the church congregation currently holds services at Seacliff Shopping Center, at the northwest corner of Main Street and Yorktown Avenue . A large proportion of these people will currently utilize Main and Yorktown . Therefore, the new church building will not generate a large number of new trips - at this particular intersection . Comment 2 We are concerned that if the nature of the (Seacliff) Business Park changes in the future such that these spaces are no longer available, a severe parking deficit will result . Response 2 Please refer to modified Condition of Approval No . 3 . d. , which requires a covenant be recorded to guarantee available parking spaces for the life of the church. ATTACHMENT NO._ 3 ALTERNATIVE ACTION FOR DENIAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO- 90-16 FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1 . The proposed church will not be compatible with adjacent residential uses because the noise and traffic genrated by a 1, 935 seat capacity building will be excessive. 2 . On-site parking and circulation are inadequate for the proposed church because there is not adequate parking on site for the amount of demand generated. l: r ' PETITION TO: THE HONORABLE HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION AND HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: CONDITIONIAL USE PERMIT NO. 90-16/NEGATIVE . DECLARATION NO. 90-13 (TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF A . TWO-STORY, 42 ,000 SR. FT. CHURCH WITH 1 , 935 SEAT CAPACITY, OVER A ONE-LEVEL SUBTERRANEAN PARKING STRUCTURE AND JOINT USE OF PARKING AT SEACLIFF OFFICE PARK) THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF PACIFIC RANCH IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 'ASK THAT THE HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL DENY THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90-16/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 90- 13 BECAUSE THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE HUNTINGTON. BEACH CHURCH OF RELIGIOUS SCIENCE FACILITIES IS TOTALLY INCOMPATIBLE WITH THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUMS. THE HUNTINGTON BEACH COMPANY, WHICH IS THE PROPERTY OWNER OF THE PROPOSED CHURCH SITE, WAS ALSO THE DEVELOPER OF PACIFIC RANCH, AND REPRESENTED TO PROSPECTIVE BUYERS AT THE PACIFIC RANCH THAT THE ADJACENT AREA THAT IS THE PROPOSED SITE FOR THE CHURCH, WHICH AT THE TIME CONTAINED OIL WELLS , WOULD BE DEVELOPED AS OFFICE SPACE SIMILAR TO THE OTHER OFFICE FACILITIES IN THE SEACLIFF OFFICE PARK. THERE WAS NEVER ANY MENTION OF A HIGH DENSITY CHURCH FACILITY BEING BUILT ADJACENT TO THE PACIFIC RANCH CONDOMINIUMS. ALTHOUGH THE NOISE IMPACT IS ADDRESSED IN THE STAFF REPORT OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, THE RESIDENTS OF PACIFIC RANCH BELIEVE THAT DESPITE THESE EFFORTS THE PROPOSED USE OF THE FACILITY FOR THE TYPE OF CHURCH ACTIVITY CONTEMPLATED WILL GENERATE AN UNACCEPTABLE LEVEL -OF NOISE AND ACTIVITY INCOMPATIBLE WITH THE ADJACENT OFFICE COMPLEXES AND RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUMS . THE CURRENT OFFICE FACILITIES GENERATE VERY LITTLE NOISE, AND ARE ESSENTIALLY LOW DENSITY. ALSO, THE OFFICE COMPLEX HOURS ARE GENERALLY COMPATIBLE WITH THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL AREAS . SPECIFICALLY, OFFICE. TRAFFIC IS GENERALLY DURING WEEKDAY BUSINESS HOURS . THE PROPOSED CHURCH SITE WILL INVOLVE EXTREMELY HEAVY TRAFFIC AND CONGESTION ON SUNDAYS , SATURDAYS , AND WEEKDAYS FROM 7 : 00 A.M. TO 12 : 00 P.M. THE ADJACENT OFFICE FACILITIES DO NOT GENERATE ACTIVITY WHICH IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS . . THE RESIDENTS OF PACIFIC RANCH DO NOT BELIEVE THAT THE AUTO TRAFFIC ACTIVITY ON SUNDAYS WILL BE LESS INTENSE THAN THE SURROUNDING TRAFFIC THE REMAINDER OF THE WEEK. ON SUNDAYS SOMETIME BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 8 :00 A.M. AND NOON THERE WILL BE IN THE VICINITY OF 2 ,800 TO 3 , 600 PERSONS 3a �ti t. CONVERGING ON THE CHURCH. ALL OF THIS VEHICULAR TRAFFIC AND OTHER ACTIVITY FOCUSING IN ON SUCH A SMALL AREA WILL, INCREASE THE NOISE OVER THE CURRENT USE TO AN UNACCEPTABLE LEVEL. THE CHURCH IS CURRENTLY OCCUPYFNG -THE SEACLIFF SHOPPING CENTER ACROSS THE STREET, AND ANYONE FAMILIAR WITH THAT FACILITY ON SUNDAY MORNINGS WILL UNDERSTAND THE EXTENT OF THE DISRUPTION OF THE LOCAL AREA. ALTHOUGH THE RECOMMENDED NOISE REDUCTION MEASURES ARE COMMENDABLE , THE REALITY OF THE SITUATION IS THAT THE NOISE GENERATED WILL BE CONSIDERABLE IN EXCESS OF THE CURRENT OFFICE COMPLEXES , WHICH IS THE TYPE OF FACILITY THAT ACCORDING TO THE HUNTINGTON BEACH COMPANY, WHICH SOLD PACIFIC RANCH, WAS TO TAKE THE PLACE OF THE OIL WELLS THAT WERE IN THE PROPOSED AREA WHEN THE CONDOMINIUMS WERE SOLD TO THE PUBLIC. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS BORDERED ON THE NORTHWEST, NORTH, EAST, AND SOUTH BY THE PACIFIC RANCH RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY, NOT JUST ON THE NORTH AND EAST AS THE STAFF REPORT SUGGESTS . WHILE IT IS TRUE THAT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HAS SOME CONCRETE BLOCK WALLS AROUND SOME OF THE PERIMETER, THE BLOCK WALL DOES NOT SERVE AS A BARRIER FOR SOUND, LIGHT, DUST, AND SIGHT BECAUSE THE RESIDENCES AROUND THE PROPERTY ARE BUILT ON GROUND THAT IS IN MANY INSTANCES AT THE SAME ELEVATION AS THE TOP OF THE WALLS . THE PEOPLE WHO LIVE AROUND THE PROPERTY KNOW THAT ANY NOISE PRODUCED ON THE SIDE CARRIES DIRECTLY TO THE SURROUNDING RESIDENCES BECAUSE THAT IS JUST WHAT HAPPENED WITH THE NOISES FROM THE OIL WELL PUMPING UNITS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT BEFORE IT WAS MOVED. THE PROPOSED USE OF THIS BUILDING AND FACILITIES FROM 8 : 00 A.M. TO 10 : 00 P.M. SUNDAY THROUGH FRIDAY AND 8 : 00 A.M. THROUGH 9 : 00 P.M. ON SATURDAY PROBABLY REPRESENTS ONE OF THE BUSIEST USES IN ALL OF HUNTINGTON BEACH. TO APPROVE SUCH AN APPLICATION FOR A PIECE OF- PROPERTY THAT IS BOARDED ON ALMOST ALL FOUR SIDES BY RESIDENCES AND A PIECE OF PROPERTY THAT DOES NOT HAVE ANY DIRECT ACCESS TO ANY PUBLIC STREET IS INCOMPREHENSIBLE. RESIDENTS OF PACIFIC RANCH WILL DO WELL TO CONSIDER THE FACT THAT CONSTRUCTION OF THIS FACILITY COULD FURTHER AGGRAVATE OUR ALREADY SEVERE WATER PRESSURE PROBLEM. THERE IS CONSIDERABLE OPEN AND UNDEVELOPED LAND CLOSE TO THE SEACLIFF SHOPPING CENTER THAT WOULD BE MUCH MORE SUITABLE FOR A CHURCH FACILITY SUCH AS THE ONE PROPOSED. THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF PACIFIC RANCH RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90-16/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 90-13 BE DENIED: R"o Signatut Street CA Printed Name City, State Signs -fJf•e Street Printed Name City, State Signature j Street Printed 'Name City, State T'rlvl ,� ,y 8 v i�� t_-� a 1 � Sign ture Street Printed Name City, State /0/ / 7 - J J,tr ignature Street Printed Name City, State )Z AT26 Ki Signature Str et Printed Name City, State � 3 8tur Street Prin d N me City, State `c-4 cA-t I L t /i) Signature l : Street 1l V- V 0 C'r �r y{ .� <-c..x . C-c, ) (t V Printed Name ITICity, State y as Signature Street ? ,, !?? / ( r� �d-CCt C 4e Printed Name City, State Signature Street A yo� v•N '� �-c�y T o N 1.�-��c��--4-u� '�c�, . C c� `► Z��k Printed Name f City, St to Signature Street Printed Name City, SlUate ` l ',&'o z Signature Street Printed Name City, State S ' nature Street I Printed N me City, stalO I 1 ev"'1 d-2 J-e2{1 e'- Signature Street Printed Name City, Stat l pQ . �1'SO �(}�JC4 L� Signature STtreet r� Iv►::� ,•A N Aft 1 N N�L., r,W a-T o d i3 r,�: ►--i c H, C4 VR Printed Name City, State Signature Street JA Printed Name ity, to e a 0-2 z 2 •Sign ture Street Printed ame b ity, State Signature U Street cl Printed Name City, Stat i/g/-n-�ature S-t. y /, p—tr'- StreetPrinted NACity, State Sign�ture Street ou Ail Pri ed Na a `,y City, to Signa u e Street / -;,i ' p-If:'A'5;q !``2JN j Printed Nam City, ate y C410 Dr #--f oq- r Signature Street i f t Gly t�iU Z l 1 G�� I 6 �l cA q)&III Printed Name City, St t Signature Street Printed Name City, St e Signature Street Printed Name City, State F 4 ignature Street. rinte Name City, State Signa ure St r et / Pr' ted Name City, State 0 A S o Ai &v c LAN r- 11 ature Street G�s A VO4 CAYI A) r, C, Q Printed 'Name City, State ,GYM-c _�► ,.��1 7t11r� sit��u F F L) . f io b Signature C/) Street tiA N T,Aj To Printed Name City, St to Signature Street Printed Name City, State CA Sign at ure Street ,y Printed Name City, Stat Si na ure Street Printed Nam Ci T. y,_Ste �Alrdl,Vo7i:�e. Signature Street Printed Name City, State 3; ♦ - .. _-RJR - Y -k I^• 1RO32 1�6 we pk-id6 Z:.. Signatur Street - . V !X {- Tz Printcld Name . City, Stat 1"dHPgNO si)ehature Street JP,NcT Printed Name City, State FZ 71 �dho 'o i rfa t44 Street Sit—rPlie n A•Z*zr%i c - g n��,va Tyi•� �.4c1, . aZ(�Y Printed Name City, Stat6 Signature Street t4u YMj Printed Name City, Sta ;::Lgnature lip, Stree Printed Name City, State 3 IS/ So p v 41V -z-C) Signet eet St40-FAI L Printed Name City, State Signature Street Printed Name City, 10 Fi na re / ` Street -lie," LPrinted ame City, Sta - h.,� ti ign ture Street • V'A J Printed Name City, Rate Y Signature Street Printed Name City, State ignature t eet c' e/-T cd Printed-Name City, Statcd C.�) � r U S L Signat',6rel �jF( Street) Printed Name City, State �' ,�--1 Ley- c� r �'�►� �l Z") r s Signature Street Printed Name City, State Signature Street ry Printed Name City, State mac./ Y Signature Street Printed Name City, State Signature Street Printed Name City, State Signature Street Printed Name City State w 7 S 3 2 .SSPRIw� �22d/ Signature Street ri ,ted a City; State T D1z 20/ Signature Street 47-r, '9&Xg. C Printed Name City, State 1` J13/_ R 1qA.JGW L ti /Jd ignature J Street Pri e d Nam m ; City, State Signnature Street rinted Name City, State S ' gna ure Street 11"rinfed N me City, State Signature Street Printed Name City, State Signature Street U k) C906�w Printed Na a City, State .S `Signature Street. - Printed Name City, State Signature Street 1 A 1e - Printed Name City, St e Signatu a Street A2,exV Printed [,Nam4 City, St to 41 Signature Street 9.vYW Printed Nam City, State t ti4�z �p�P9N' La 'gna re Street Printed Name City, State Signature Street tC!tt .fie}�tJSd kMW CA OI"LG�& Printed Name City, State Signatu a Street Printed Name City, State (4jjwjcth3Gtu1iA!'d� l9�13a T d NPA�VO ri�uC -#11 i Sign4ture Street A�JJMW ��a�t�A� NT�N mN BF�tcFt_, C �%db'18 Printed Name City, State 3 L. x {; } Si at Street - M,4-R ,C,7'nJ�/EUM M ti'(L!L err G( G '1k - Print d Name City, S e 141 So ( KArliAc R LK, cH= 1C77 Signature Street 46 rt Q/'-i'c u e,(+L'`�- g- Printed Name City, State an6 w'op/ -1311 Goh o Y d�. Signature Street L I IJDR IQ f')G�{�S 1�gun�� `�n N4,�h 6F)- 9 �l Printed:Name City, tate ` SigiVature Street — ;:)�M eisa Pr' ed Name City, State nature Y t1treet Printed Name City, State Signa re Street Printed Name City, State 1&U4'4J Si t U Street J Pr ted Name City, St l #/o 6 Signature I Street uo y� Printed Name 614ty, State T Signature Street Printed Name City, State 'x. Signature ` V 1\ Street Le Printed Name City, State �0 `ma c f _iO �gnature Street Printed -Name City, State n7 xw Si, nature Street 9 VIP" Printed Name City, State fd Signature Street S /mac Printed game City, State Aoo-,At� � �i Signature Street GG(5j)jYc ,e #1 46, 1 14f Printed Name City, State 19 f prmpa, Signature Street Printed Name City, State Signature Street Printed Name City, State . - - i Si ture Street R nted Name City, State 7321 Signature Street yr p enp9tyo � cl# 92-6-466 Printed Name City, State Signature Street Printed Rame City, State ` Signature Street Printed Name City, State Signature Street Printed Name City, State Signature Street Printed Name City, State Signature Street Printed Name City, State Signature Street Printed Name City, State ------------ 4 t L L 3 1l Signature Street Printed Name City, State Signature Street Printed Name City, State Signature Street Printed Name City, State ` Signature Street Printed Name City, State Signature Street Printed Name City, State Signature Street Printed Name - City, State Signature Street Printed Name City, State Signature Street Printed Name City, State 7402 Yellowtail Drive ; # 101 Huntington beach, CA 92648 July 5, 1990 Huntington Beach Planning Commission 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ,Dear Chairwoman Ortega and Commissioners: I live in Pacific Ranch and I ask that you reconsider the effect on the 558 families here before granting Conditional Use Permit No�. , 90-16 for the construction of the Huntington Beach Church of Religious Science in Seacliff Office Park. It may not matte a big difference to the community at large, but it would have a tremen- dous impact on our lives. Traffic-.Congestion :The .Seacliff Office Park has only half the r*t.mber of entrances of Seacliff S hoppifig Center, and they are Within a half block of Pacific Ranch' s Yorktown and Main Street entrances . The Church' s plop. to reduce Sunday morning services from 3 to 2, puts 1.2- -to 2 times the current number of churchgoers per sery ce:-tiIrough 2 c.s"ttiaZiy entrances . Traffic can enter Seacliff Shopping Center on ` 3 sides of the block; Seacliff Office Par`k' s entrances are between Pacific Ranch entrances on 2 sides of': the block. As Paci.flc Ranch neared build-out, residents were asked to avoid using the Yorktown entrance during peak traffic to reduce back--up on Yorktown. An" expected 300 people arriving each. weekday for 6 PM services would ad& substantially to_ that peak period. 2 short sections- .of Yorktown and Main Street would have to ':Garry all the crutch traffic. Traffic Noise: The .effect of a large auditorium adjacent to, and fitting into, _.a..corner bordered by the residential 'complex would be the same, whether it was a movie theater, a 'Lecture hall , or a church,. Their events have a scheduled ''starting<_time . -= cars .would arrive and cave en mass . Traffic noise and exhaust -fumes would be continuous - f4r'-whatever period it takes for 1009.._ 200, or 600 cars to funnel ifi.14and park, or start-up and leave- >,. Because the 'proposed site fits into the ' Southwestern section of Pacific Ranch, the on- shore breeze would carry the noise and fumes through -the housing_. area. Church Sery ce ; Noise : The submitted drawings for the proposed church showJ'a-h Outdoor Classroom and a building with windows opening out on the :taro 1 sides bordered by residences . The music, lectures, sermons or social gatherings would. spill over -- ••there. is no-' ,way,,.nearly 2000 people can be quiet. The walls tha.t,'.axe supper t ' .s--top. the sound, haven' t stopped the- breezes and :.',did .not stop the Oil well noise arising from the same site. Pacif tc-Ranch could not P w _ f4 escape the church's services -- morning and/or= night -- severi--days_l r- y. a week. Safety: Most Pacific Ranch residents work during the day and are home in the evenings and weekends . Evenings and weekends are the `- stated peak use periods for the proposed church. In case of emergency/ disaster (earthquake/explosion/fire) , up to 2000 people from". the church and 1200 to 1500 people from the housing complex would compete for the same exit areas . Pacific Ranch has 4 gates for entering anti leaving the complex directly to the street (Clay, Huntington, Yorktown,and Main) . An additional gate leads into the Yorktown entrance of the Seacliff Office Park -- the Pacific Ranch Board of Directors had investigated eliminating that gate to provide more parking space in the complex. The complex was .not permitted to do that -- . 5 gates were required. : In practical terms, Seacliff Office Park and Pacific Ranch would cancel out each others ability to exit promptly onto Yorktown and Main Street any time mo$t of the residents were home when church services were being conducted. That' s every weekend and evening. I can not believe it would be prudent to add a large capacity auditorium of any sort into a single block, when three quarters of it is covered with high density housing. I' ve lived in Pacific Ranch for 5 years , and it' s been quiet and peaceful. I ask your help in keeping it that way. Sincerely, Dorothy M. Kelly 144, July 31 , 1990 A07AIA.II J6 &M1nl5 Dear Huntington Beach +990 I'm a homeowner at Pacific Ranch and am very concerned Dri•ARTP•, , about the prospect of Conditfonal Use Permit No. 90-16. ;, P, -7 o P P eo�,�r,J11 i , D��I�•_0?�.4FfVT My husband and myself oppose it very much. I OP We once owned a home neighboring a church of this population, it was a nightmare and one of the reasons we sold and bought at Pacific Ranch. The nightly church activities lasted into the night far beyond thier time of closure. Having alot of people on this church site Monday thru Friday until 10: OOPM or beyond will conflict with the piece and tranquility of the Pacific Ranch residents. The scope of this project will also effect our weekend quality of life to the unbearable. When we bought at Pacific Ranch we were told that adventually there would be office buildings on the site-which we do not object to. The noice barriors (existing block walls) will serve no purpose when it comes to noice. Due to the fact the top of the walls are even with our elevated:L-Tront=.ygrds. The staff report states that this is adiquite-we feel this has not been looked into. What about the air conditioning noice which will probably be located on the roof ???? We question the safty of the church access! ! ! Thesis no street access, just parking lot entrances that service the office complex, which were not designed for this use. I see major problems with emergencies like fire. How would cars get out ??? The scope of this church is far to great for this location. If and when a church of this calabar is built, it should -be on a site much better suited for thier.:request. And much more compatible with its neighbors. The parking situation and no direct street access seems to me a reason for the city to reject their request. This church is a growing church and is growing fast. -fhey state they have 3000 active members. Why is the church requesting a 1935 setting facility with 2 sessions on sunday if they don' t plan on additional members???? Where will the new members park as this rapidly growing church grows????? In Pacific Ranch ! ! In Seacliff Shopping Center??? s x I can see were this will be a great business deal for the. Huntington Beach Co. But I quite frankly feel this is not what- we expected from the City of Huntington Beach or the Huntington Beach Co. There seems to be many much better sites for this church besides the one proposed.Some Pacific Ranch residents feel this will greatly effect our piece and tranquility Thank You F..: 5 August 1 , 1990 DEPAR T,I",:r oF. i3OMMUNITY. DEVELOPMUJT `T P_LA:_Ji1�iNG P_lV_ISIOIY, City of Huntington Beach Community Development 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach , Calif . 92648 Re : Conditional Use Permit No . 90- 16 Negative Declaration No . 90- 13 Dear Laura Phillips : I have been a resident at Pacific Ranch for nearly five years . and have enjoyed the life style there . At the time we purchased our unit we were told that the property in question was to be for another office building and not a church . I am most concerned about the possibility of a church being built right adjacent to our property . The noise factor is of great concern as is the parking and the pollution from the cars . What concerns me even more . is the accessibility of the fire . trucks to reach the new facility in of a fire , especially during peak usage . I would not want to be on the Planning Commission and approve such a high density facility, knowing the access is really limited and lives will be in jeopardy. It really troubles me that the church will not have direct access% to the main streets and will have to use the existing parking lots to gain entrance and exit . I urge you to vote N.0 on this Negative Delcaration. Thanking you for your kind attention . Sincerely , William S . Yunek 7402 Coho Drive 110 Huntington Beach , Calif . 92648 f , T _7321 COHO - &201 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 AUGUST 1, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION CITY HALL - HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 I WANT TO VOICE MY OBJECTION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90-16 FOR THE CHURCH OF RELIGIOUS SCIENCE. THE OPERATING HOURS AND THE MAXIMUM OCCUPANCY Of THE PROPOSED BUILDING WILL BECOME A NOISE NUISANCE TO MY HOME LOCATED DIRECTLY ADJACEMENT TO MY HOME AND OTHER HOMES IN THE PACIFIC RANCH DEVELOPMENT. WHEN I BOUGHT MY QONDOMINIUM FOUR YEARS AGO I WAS ADVISED BY THE PACIFIC RANCH SALES STAFF THAT THE ADJACENT VACANT PROPERTY WOULD CONTINUE TO BE ZONED AS OFFICE STRUCTURES. PLEASE HAVE YOUR STAFF INVESTIGATE THE IMPACT OF THIS PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE. OURS TRULY GERRY STREET _ C w`• N _ t S i t v 19351 Sunray Ln #204 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 August 2, 1990 City of Huntington Beach Community Development 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Conditional Permit for Church at Main and Yorktown Sirs: My name is Pedro Jose Diaz. I am a Pacific Ranch Resident. I am also a Civil Engineer with a Proffesional Engineer License. I am a former traffic Engineer who had the honor to represent the Puerto Rico Highway Authority at the Institute•.6f Traffic Enginners Convention in Houston, Texas in 1970. I am sorry to say that in spite of the sympathy I feel for the Church wanting to build the propossed facility at Main & Yorktown, I have to oppose it. My opposition is based mainly on the impact on traffic in our neighborhood by the proposed use. A second consideration is the noise generated by a :_ large number of cars leaving at the same=:time after some function at night. A third consideration is the negative impact on property value of the pro- posed use. A parting thought is that the site under consideration would by out grown in a short time by this church which is obviously growing at a remarkable rate. Thank you for your attention. Yours, Yee - -lose iaz wo FT-1 CV August 11 1990 At 1 (J 3 1990 Huntington Beach Planning Committee 2000 Main Street DEPARTRIE^!T 0 Huntington Beach, California 92648 COMM ' ITti' Dear Members of the Planning Committee: I have just been made aware of the extent of the proposed building project for a church to be built in Seacliff Office Park. My villa in Pacific Ranch faces this site. I am very opposed to this project and wish to let you know how I feel and why. I further understand that your cormittee is meeting next Tuesday, the 6th of August and I will be attending along with many of my neighbors in Pacific Ranch. My understanding is that the church plans to build a facility large enough to accommodate it's 6,000 members, at times holding as many as. 1800 at a session. Their membership is much too large for that small a space and much, much too close to a residential neighborhood where homes were chosen and purchased for their quiet location. I have many concerns about this proposed project, the main ones are as .follows: , 1. TRAFFIC 2. NOISE 3. POLLUTION 4. CONSTRUCTION 5. SIZE OF FACILITY, AMOUNT OF MEMBERS ARRIVING AND LEAVING AT ALL HOURS OF THE DAY AND NIGHT 6. DECREASE IN HOME'S VALUE We at Pacific Ranch feel very strongly about this proposed project, and will do everything in our power to be assured that it does not pass council. I personally have every intention of doing everything I can to keep my villa's location as quiet and comfortable as it now is and more importantly assuring it's value. Once again, I will attend the meeting on Tuesday to express my views to you in person. Thank you for your consideration. S4Dt�snz'id, A Pacif' Ranch Homeo*ner cc: Mei aii rs of City :Council City Administrator r fl. f 7 V : - , .. . 1.990 UE'ARTi.%4'-iT 0'r C.c�C��C%% / QG�vYT 50 COMMUNITY, DEVELO Pm,E NT. eLANNI.fyG DIVISION 67 J ��"yliY/YI�G��Gt.C_. �v�c,LC'—(-�j✓vL�1i��C C . � C ! I I�>t 911{y!(t�1A,XS1L`tr��,ti: I�r�.I�n�CGI}+`'�1�:u, .t,:!' !`I .. ' •'a-1 I 1 I —_ i(I fl!y5''4�,'�+�'�!�'i•':�'$.Ii:?��,r 1,.,.� I i:ia !!..: I-� I,I I L..I1.. L I j 1 I 'L. I_ CO t:i l r, t : ;r -T,.: LL- i 1 i ._1 L11 tr ;SIN'{ r J l_.I LL s�1:�tar,i;!.(+,.l'fi,.�,;s`'•'Fr r A,I.J('1 Lt. I.I iI i:l:,1. I1 L...ILt L..l _.0% - C^.;0 6 1n9i _ L i W Of: i 11 iiJ I_I Lll " CO 'I n_r sty CEP ARTNIE.N] tla +r F a I. !.1..1 I Lt. _ - -- N I i 1 I;c: :_I:: L!I _ I %'_ _i :`i.: I`_I 'L LU :C: CO M M Uccl C) I.11 CiI Lit I'- .. C cl l:L' PLANNING UIV!.':,l;,..i l tsa IJ.1 i:: I ': - Z jst c,y:L,.•;.I, .._ ill I;Ji _yf .. __ f-- f L- I.� "I LIJ I:J III IIJ 21 U_J U1 a ti h y'I� ... :1 I .i '{ F- ...,1 _ ! 't I1.J ..I, .�' �' 1 U.1 ( 1I I t I:...1 ..I ::_i 1.1.` i .J •'I: I:.J ixt —, Y i L.L! _., 11 t li _1 -1 CC ll_I LL, :.f.: (... l.I.I ''L '-,.1 Ll_i l-_1 I,1.1 -' ..J LY.: I I .j[_ L I I I J I I I.,1 i._ :,{ _ I"' 1;!l L.L.. !-L I_i1' L.I I I:-1 I- t1. 1_1 ] i?1 U-1 , - �... ..._I — _ :. I ..t:.. ...I:: !;I 1.1 ...1 ..J. +' L.LI ':1„ I:.l o--, 1 LJJ +:..I �... J: (-_1 iI iit - ' I ij r".; 7. C:': :I. C.a _L Cl LII I13 1 _ C.) .__1 LU .J r, I-- I�l UJ I !:I ..1.. �..I J 1-1 I"''1 1'I J I-- 1_'1 1 1 LI 1 ''._. ti :`�• r. CI I.LJ 1.0 i_.'1 !. 1C7.17Lit Cj t.l.l J f iil 1-0 i Cl i 1 LC: Z- U.- IYl- _ -. 11J •j :;I LI.. LL Lit S I .' 01 GI i:' '::' I:.1.. F•- C-1 -.. I ....1 hi <:1. I_.. LLI C) U-1 CID •... i I I , .. .._ - �! r l 'I T. ' T • CC- .1 - I. 1 +._� - 7 1 �ttt r9Fd[ sI" ' r !• i7,h�.y t,.a , J - "+J 1 l: . ! i ri .-, I`I UJ I-I. I.J - r 1 LU ::i: ii1 i tif! }., i'+ I,L Y {r I � LI_ I �7 . I J: I- 1_IJ �-+ ;::. ... •:f. 1-�! I U I i I t,lts4�Y I �� f �_� - - I ..! , I I L..I ... .. :. I' ' ' I_.. i. , i��iE��`T�,l s. �• � - ., ! ! .. t. L I i I,'I. '.I 111 LL• 0.1 III ::'I II! 1,!1 !J I+1 ,�,,"{1 , `• ._ .� ,g' +!, i[., CA 1.. I_ ,T I 1 1 U I L_' t;-1 aC. F I LI I :• Lt! #i uffo c r I :,l.l 11 ... 03 U., II ! . tl �. � th ! - t C+{I it'll • MVP. RTi 1 ... 1 . .j I� ill IL1 ! il_, 11 5J»�{r�tllt CGt,1UJN!i'(' L I I 1L1 I:' -. III I } L. J` fair itt (' Le !: 1 1 .1 fit ili -i IIJ i:i !1.. Lt: !. i:7'. 1J1 ID !'1 11 1 ",, Y:1 W (:i ,., J,. :T. J P. I rl i ::I. L ll I l.I ll', ;") 1 L i--• .._ C-11 }-• IJJ CO i L I_ Ll a J t.l T'- 1— LL{ ,..., I-i.l 1 i iJ . :C -I I 1 1J.! Of I.!) !I! 71 --I r , 1''1 -- .'f I 'I !.�- T' i I '-� I.i 1 all • :' ... ct '.� � j '�' !•' 1,.. I,I .. I.1.1 no I , g:..!. `:'! ;.1 ::..I 1-I r.., i i! '' +ai !ii CC L!. I t.: __' tj_ i 1•; i i) I.:+ I i:_ i i:, L,.. :, 1" +'I 1-. 1.1 l .....I i 1 i 1:j ; !:i 1- .,.J ft. UJ '- t _ ;,:,:1 �':�,� ,... .:; ;:i r• .,: I'I ;JJ I - I LJ! I:.:I !-• t.t_ ` ' 1._i 1 (;, ,.... QD L�i (!.' i?_1 } t'L`• 0 I'' l.! tr' --, CO C.) 1- 1. CD .I l I. :,. .�' (t, ,.,,. .. !! :..i � '.t. '� '-' Ia'. I._I '� ••`I IIJ LL. ! f!1 I1J LL., i!1 r-� ,..., t..J 1.0 Itit ill ,., ... !JI lJJ 1 1' _, ,: .,�. _. LLI � CO _t� I In <I wj CA Ld - t it ry i L i :':) r t I:1:1 -1 :j. I L. L. I i 1 ') 1-) IJJ i CO 1.., 1 ! I LI I'. t 1'I IIJ -. .ONi i _1 1 , i ..I 7. IJ! I._1 1: r ;,.+ 1.. I.IJ 1 1. - ... i Ali; '„�:: .. I :.I ....� :'l:: I.L.. . .. i::1 ';i ....; ..,. _ I�_ 1,.1 ..{ I�.:I I i I ..1 + , :I.. 1 .,I till I- i_I-{ LJ.1 }- i1i 'l. . .I . ( !l- _ . C.0 L.. I:, ft` .S_ 1.,1 lL: i!J iJ',. - J IJ::I 1 I-p 1- 1 l. _ I _ `) . L.! ir'. P CC 0 On - ' ! lJS i, - r .... l.11 tiI ., co i1.1 .'C' +:'; ;IJ 0i i � �_ I. 1 L'{ ( . :...� f ,.., CK .'i_ !.J:: ... .:. 'I'I I1.1 I IJ. Li: _.J I.... UA I-- LU l:r.' :+ 1. i.t:. 1.1.1 LI- L.LI 1.1.1 ,.., Ch. L1 I-D I L!! L.,r ..., L. ,.., i:.a ;--- :I:! -- L!J -- ... ';. l!J :L: in i._i 1 j 4.1.. .-.I 1 :]I I—• {!'. '�'I I.J LU i i 1 i_ _ _ NJ - 1_ !IJ - - - - — r :..1 1, ,! 1..1 i'1 t:.i I,:�!ti ...1 !a LI! - ' _ _ T. 1... I L... '. _�. , L.0 1__I }•- Ill :. :,. t•! t, <.T: '.T' I:.i I;i: LY: ii:. I1J C. LL! .:}' +-� 7 i�. !it 1. i...., LJ 1.-1 U.. '-_ ! 1 I:r) UI I1.1 .''- U. 1A ::T: Ci:: LLI }._ 2 11.1 I-- L!1 " U.1 , _. - —!..I.1 !- it !.LI !:.� t:1 I I I. R 11: ._ I 1.f.1 } L.f i_! 1 • ii' r I r i ':1 �;E'< :•� 1 I ' V�. i 1 is I - - I , � qJ QQ 1 it =r , I c.: i ! (. I '(- ' i rl 1-1 �iJ�ra'kCth+�rlis Y,tf� •' il 1'1 t_ i ,'' III .� :. '41�{:j?g,!}��, I'I 1 It'. I IL on, t.1i ' I ' I{ II ytt�1'f, d _.{ Cl (I i F_I 171 It j!y' 5 Ib'+J I r5t�1 ,ii,riM{�{V ldf" q17� aIJi l�r�r 6-142a7,r- i 2721 Delaware Street HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648-2599 Phones (714) 536-3537, 960-8426 August 7, 1990 GARY B. BEARD, Pastor Laura Phillips Planning Department `'T' City of Huntington Beach `l -yQ' A `11' 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Ms. Phillips: I am the pastor of Huntington Beaches oldest church and a resident of Pacific Ranch. First United Methodist , 2721 Delaware at the corner of 17th St. and Clay was incorporated June 24, 1904. I have been a pastor for 34 years and many of those years I lived next to the church. I have had to answer to neighbors complaining about youth groups, weddings , parties, concerts, parking, organ music, early morning prayer groups , children' s activities, singing and nightly meetings . I have never had more than the 400 members that are at my present church. There is no way that a church the size of the proposed church would be able to conform to the small space surrounded by a residential community. Our church moved to its present location in 1967 when it was alone out here; the neighbors chose to move next to us and they do complain. I chose to move to Pacific _Ranch so I could be near my church, within walking distance. My wife and I inquired as to what would be in that location and we were told it would be an officz- complex. Had we been informed that it would be a church we .would never had bought in Pacific Ranch. Our taxes are very high and we would believe that we could receive some additional study before this would be allowed to happen. Our United Methodist Church has.a board of "Building and Location" and they approve every site for a proposed church. I can assure you they would never allow a church even half the size to be placed in that area. Since we have several "Mega Churches" in Orange County I suggest that a study be made of Calvary Church in Santa Ana, Calvary Chapel in Costa Mesa , E.V. Free in Fullerton, Crystal Cathederal in Garden Grove, St . Andrews Presbyterian in Newport Beach and South Coast Community. Church in Irvine, to name a few. See how much land they have and what types of communities they are in and what problems they have encountered. The proposed church is as large as most of these churches with similar if not more activities than any average church: Church is more than an hours worship on a Sunday morning it is a community and a celebration. We gather to be with our friends. We leave the service happy and full of greeting. We linger in the parking lot and fellowship with people we haven' t seen. We laugh, we sing, we praise the LorcT-and our neighbors don' t understand. We have weddings, pot lucks, concerts and we love to sing. I would not want to be the one to tell 2000 people they can' t celebrate. In order to communicate you need microphones , amplifiers and loud musical instruments. I know how my 200 sound when they are singing "Joy to the World". I can just imagine 2000 singing in a residential neighborhood. Parking has always been a problem for most churches and I know it will be for this one because it is now. I would that we would have many more churches in Huntington Beach and I hope they would all grow as much as the proposed church has grown but to force a large church in between a very nice residential community is not in the best interest of the community of residents or the Community of Faith. If they would want to build behind the shopping center I would be first to commend their foresight and their faith on a bold venture of building for the future. Sincerely, Gary B. Beard, Pastor ' 7492 Seabluff #107 Pacific Ranch Huntington Beach, CA 92648 GBB:js Don G. Stephens ` 7401-105 Seabluff Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92648 August 3 , 1990 Re : Conditional Use Permit No. 90-16 , Negative Declaration No. 90-30 Chairwoman Geri Ortega Huntington Beach Planning Commission City of Huntington Beach - 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Chairwoman Ortega: First let me identify myself and tell you I live with my wife and two ( 2 ) sons at the above address which is in Pacific Ranch and our front door faces and is less than fifty feet from the property in the above referenced application. We own our home and have lived here for almost five ( 5 ) years now. As you no doubt know, it has taken the residents of Pacific Ranch some time to become aware of the serious impact this application would have on their lives and the value of their property if approved. Frankly, most of them who had heard anything about the application thought the plan was to build the church north of Seacliff Shopping Center . Now that they understand the proposal is to put maybe one of the largest churches in the whole City of Huntington Beach , on that isolated little piece of property surrounded on all four sides by Pacific Ranch residences , they are shocked, angry and feel betrayed by the property owner who assured them, before they purchased their property, that nothing with more dense use than office buildings would be located on that property. They feel this application does not offer acceptable planning. Enclosed you will find an additional Petition signed by more Pacific Ranch residents who - strongly urge you to deny the above referenced application. While it is difficult to asses the impact of the application because it seems like just before every scheduled hearing the Applicant changes his application specifications , it is very clear that this church is very large and is growing at an exceptional rate . It is a shame the Staff Reports I have seen talk about average attendance figures in the past instead of doing any projections on what the attendance figures will be in two ( 2 ) to three ( 3) years when the facility would be completed and occupied. At that time it is obvious the hours of use and numbers of people would be even more overwhelming than the numbers we are talking about now. (Cont'd Next Page ) Chairwoman Geri Ortega, Page 2 . Like so many of the other surrounding residents , I am very concerned about the excessive traffic , the noise , the light , the exhaust fumes , the parking problems and the potential effects of the hazardous waste that is on the property as a result of its use for so many years for oil and gas production. However, another aspect of this application has bothered me from the beginning and that is the potential for a major disaster if the building should catch on fire or if we should have an earthquake with approximately two ( 2) thousand people in the building . Most public buildings , like the one proposed, are located on a major public street where the building occupants would have a reasonable chance of escaping the area and all different types of emergency vehicles would have reasonable access to the building . This is not the case with this proposal . All of these people would be trapped back in a corner surrounded on nearly all four sides by walls and buildings with very limited exit and entrance passage ways that could be critically blocked by people or one or two vehicles ! In closing , as a resident of the City of Huntington Beach, I want to express my sincere appreciation to ,.you for the many many hours of important service you have given to everyone in the community with your work on the Planning Commission. I sincerely believe it would be a great disservice to , not only the surrounding residents , but to the Applicant as well , to approve this application. I respectfully request you deny this application. Sincerely, yak S Lp.,., DGS : Don G. Stephens Encl . cc: Ms . Laura Phillips W/Att . Please help me PREVENT EST FIRES! . 1�. � � C� lS� _"Y.1-�'-ifi�nj;9F��'L'•o,11hr!i?!�'ilrl�A�r -. _. .... _- - FROM: Dgi/i BEACH \\ uj y Cam) ,I SUBJECT: n P.O.nBOX n ri i - ll - - v HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION August 16, 1.990 - City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach;, Ca. — 92648 Re: Pacific_ Ranch Homes Building of surrounding areas. To: Howard Zelefsk:y Planning Director Dear Mr. Z-elefsky, Please be informed that all Pacific Ranch residents and Seabreeze Management Company request notification of pending or future construction at any areas surrounding Pacific Ranch. This area is surrounded by Yorktown Street, Clay Street, Huntington Street and Main Street. Notification to Seabreeze Management Company to be sent to 23232 Peralta, Suite #215, Huntington Beach, Ca. In addition any building constructed must require a bond to be posted to cover the costs of washing and damage to newly painted structures at Pacific Ranch. The Board of Directors has chosen to oppose the installation of a church facility at Main and Yorktown as submitted. Sincerely, 1 2 � 111 R. Beatty Project Manager for Pacific Ranch Homeowners Association 7432 Sea Bluff Drive • Huntington Beach, California 92648 • (714) 536-0022 Seabreeze Management Company: 23232 Peralta Drive,Suite 215 0 Laguna Hills,California 92653 •(714)583.9915 HOMEOWN RS ASSOCIATION 1 L t:•�' I._! T' �11_I I I l: ].I I!-J 1 i I.,..-.-.._.,) _..-.r r-.•- ,T J.f i. f-:1_t i. 1 d:i.I-)I::a c,f 1-)<a.I c e. 1. at, h .a i.l 1 a r'1_i 1+'i f t::el r~ c,a.r~ , f:1._!1. d e J. J.I::)e,r.a is 7.c)n t h P 1-'a.c:J. f i.c F;.a.n c I T r"!:.I r:)f P,J.1'',-,,._t f a I'..; f i.1"i d J. i. n•),`n :>55 a.r'v 't,o t.-.+•.r.l r,e<r_' t 1--i f?i.i- fl-) J a;1 i:.l.[7 n t(::) 1;I-)Ea i.n tat. J. ?.t J.c)r) c:)f a. r•-II1_J.rChi fa.c i. 1. i ty a.t thFArea Of .. I i -i r tit:)i.r'i i. '!"'!<_a..l I) .`_;1.;Y'r,r�is a I-1[::! Y'r- t-I. i; "' i !='. r:l I"1 t. "I.a is '1 1.7 for, t h'i e c.11-i.g i r i a 1. f a.c::i 1. i. t y Of r-).f:.f i.r_CP I::)1_�.i. i.to i.r'i cl��.• - Wi.i:I-r ri.de r:)-f (:h:i.s area. bc)arc{ed 1_)v Paci.fi.c Rartch't we f e y=1. t h'i I_a i.rn r.:)a.c::i< a ri the r•e i.ci e n'I,s w a 1_l 1 d 1-)c2 :_,1._r b s t a.n t i.a.l a n d dF- I;I-•i.171E-"rii1:a1. to tI'ir r.:)ver• a.1. 1. F)('-)F)1_.tl.ati(XI t-)f Ol_tr Cn-Mal tni.ty. P. I::)(i t(.7 nt:ia1. tI-a."f'f :rl-_ c:arltlesti.r)n, tr~:a.ffic a.rlci chl_.Irchi r'iui.='r-' to (TIe11ti-01') the g;ailfety CIUI'-i.nG a.n erner•cIenCy :�,J. 'Lt_I.atj.tan:sa ar`ca a1. 1. fact; )i--; that .appeal, to he opli-Clt.t5 pr•c)1:)1.(-,m wi. 't,hi t'h)c) i.n)I:)IemNr)ta.tic)r') cif a churc::h) fa.c.:i1. it.V cif frl a.,a n i. t:t_k i e. -fFla1-1k yc.,t_I. fat— yc:,l._tr~ r-c..)ns,i.der~ati.on r•egar~di.nr..l the (-'f-fac_t a.nd cc)ncr-zt,n r3'f a]. 1. Pacifi.+._ Rta.nch i.-E�,idents in t h i 3 matter Ri:ca.ncl--i I.'•iaa.t-d of i i r'er:_tc:)rs (i.in rlar t:c)n, f ,•,=:,:i.dE-n t: 7432 Sea Bluff Drive • Huntington Beach, California 92648 • (714) 536.0022 Seabreeze Management Company: 23232 Peralta Drive,Suite 215 0 Laguna Hills,California 92653 •(714)583-9915 f' August 20 , 1990 0 City of Huntington Beach City � Council Z000 Main Street `t'v�bC/L 0 Fe�cN E Huntington Beach , Calif . 92648 Applicant : Huntington Beach Church of Religious Science . Conditional Use Permit No . 90- 16 Negative Declaration No . 90- 13 Dear Honorable Mayor Mr . Tom Mays : I have been a resident at Pacific Ranch for nearly five years , and have enjoyed the quality of life there . At' the time we purchased our unit we were told that the property in question was to be for another office building and not for a church site . At the last Huntington Beach Planning Commission meeting on August 7 , 1990 , the Planning ,Commission voted 6 to 1 that the Conditional Use Permit No . 90- 16 be denied . The Commission chairwoman stated that she and other Commissioners did not believe the Seacliff Office Park was . a compatible site for the church . They were concerned that putting a church at * that site would cause traffic and noise pollution . They also noted that the site is tucked back inside the Office Park, and there are not adequate entrances or exits for up to 300 cars . I am personally concerned about the accessibility of fire trucks to reach the new facility in case of a fire , especially -during peak usage . I would not _want to be on the City Council and approve such a high density facility , knowing the access is really limited and lives will-_ be .in -.jeopa-idy. The noise , auto traffic, lights and activity associated with a large church use on that site will exceed the intensity normally associated with an office park. I urge you to vote ' NO on this Conditional Use Permit and Negative Declaration . 4Sincerely , William S . Yuney 7402 Coho Drive 110 Huntington Beach , Calif . 92648 --_- _�_-_.__-.. �—��._._...a+�._..r.. .. ...-: :_._.. :..:. e.ert'__3:.:.i •.:• .....:1_l. ,F•,d . —:?t=}3tyh.•,r.:4iiS.'•7'-1 August 16, 1990 AUG.22 1990 ::. .... Dear Huntington Beach City Counsel , CITY OF HUNTING I 'm a homeowner at Pacific Ranch and m very C 7Y COUNCIL OFFICE o a y ICE about the prospect of Conditional Use Permit No. 90-16 . We were at the city planning—meeting August 7, 1990 and are aware that the permit was denied. We are also aware the Huntington Beach Church of Religious Science has appealed that decision. My husband and myself oppose this project in this location very much. When we bought at Pacific Ranch we were told by Urban West that when the site was releaved of the existing oil wells that there would be an extension of the exisitng office park, which we did not object to. ( Pacific Ranch was a joint : venture between Urban West and the Huntington Beach Company) We did our homework before we purchased at Pacific Ranch and found that this site had Uses and Zoning for oil production or residential. We were told that it would be office park which all would be acceptable neighbors in our oppinion. We once owned a home neighboring a church of this population, it was a nightmare and one of the reasons we sold and bought at Pacific Ranch. As you can see by _their request the church conducts business every day and very late every night. We feel this conflicts with the piece and tranquility of Pacific Ranch residents . The scope of this project and the amount of its membership using this site night and day will greatly affect our quality of life. The parking situation and no direct street access seems to me reason enough to not allow approximatly 1000 cars on that site at one time. This church is a very fast growing church and will rapidly grow into thier 42, 000 square foot building and beyond. The scope of this church is far to great for this site and will greatly effect Pacific Ranch and the exisiting office park. If and when a church of this calabar is built, it should be on a site much .better suited for their request and much more compatible with its neighbors . Its quite apparent the Planning Commission shares in our feelings . * We question the safty of the church and the amount of people on site in an emergency situation????? * We question the safty hazards that may occure with Pacific Ranch and the church all trying to get out at. the same time??? * We are concerned with traffic congestion! ! ! ! * We are greatly concerned with the noice the church will create! ! ! ! f .. We understand that this is a great business deal for the Huntington Beach Co. , but we feel they should respect the, : conditions we bought our homes under. Thank You / R rt and Regi rof "' 1 of}i>i �"' ��'�'�''� ,,�"��k '�' ice• {I° r,�� 4 '�. ; y, �� , � �-; �. ,� � l ��{rt �,� �,•�.y"i � } .F-( r 1 �- a �� { I `�r � ..a.S,`rK �r•. TT' _T y 1-s,. �.✓ -; t I' ..-�-( ""� r� I g r (� s r I,' .s'_r rs VOW Ni TS art } ii✓-. tJ. .,`� `.. *yy 1 Ai.-t'7 r y { - < I i r Z e.• J,I T- y r Yr r i' L r C -I:•�. 'y_ �I�_��yG£JC S ��tJl r 11 � i ✓,{ice C' _ r! 'mac 3��H.b i .. +� I 1 k .1 { L{l..�fi;' y •T ,57x(N. �� r /. /. r '7 X J'!1 •i _ � �Ga.: k� '.�I � �.� � 0 -� �'_ 7\11 i .. L 1 is x 4.c. •..'.E. ` _' cif 6r:� 'y� � `a J _)��/1.1 _ r� ,AI. ..I I ��.�' 7 �,l Or T � G I�,,..r�� ..1:�®�l j i�i ✓ �� r ';?�� jl,: tj! T'" - � � �A 'o��^K.*,-." Ir'? �.I��jiy��1= 4 _ _ ��/. Q+ i+.�.,1 it3._.._ ��-^.:-'"•^.I"-� - 'Li, .1r: �.x: ....gyp), III ..I >;, � 1.:: "r•" r. >is • '(Ar. .N' L �.1 1 °' W;I {'.,�i'}�` {1�°'ta"'f ''-a.,;;��Y 1 I>"�..rx' 1 i F J+�'4. � �i'4 � r i.r*L • • • "�. C�; � �'�. I �,:^- r 9��`�'p S � r•.s r aim _ � x L r "`x ..r t rt r' �.rC. • iL -' - 5�72 _ `��r ._.: �y3 A 'aP j' S �a � �.•!� `sq _ '1—rr...a"'r's�..F'�„ � • :. • __ - ._. '- - =,�.,, � -111y. „ �t®n.t�-�E Vial,! ,v. a lii r' � �r��:'•: 'bow— i�ra,� Fc..,-.m.;�plllllll�ll9�Fei4 I,,, yr.'se:e� C -r.'• _ ,ri{il{! 'ii11 II •1IL \ {t4`+� " J -. % tF r R ''.r"�'. f'��• • • ! - _ �. ''tri .�•�. -i'•' ate; „r r�.Ff �dYulr� _tr r r • • RESTRICTIONS: (Continued) December 7, 1984 as Instrument No. 84-509556, Official Records of Orange County, California. This subdivision is also subject to Agreements recorded on August 14, 1984 as Instrument No. 84-337163 and September 6, 1984 -as Instrument No's. 84-372207 and 84-372208, Official Records of Orange County, California. FOR INFORMATION AS TO YOUR OBLIGATIONS AND RIGHTS, YOU SHOULD `READ THE RESTRICTIONS. THE SUBDIVIDER SHOULD MAKE THEM AVAILABLE TO YOU. MINERAL RIGHTS: You will not own the mineral, oil and gas rights under your land below a depth of 500 feet. These have been reserved. The right to surface entry has been waived. USES AND ZONING: . Land adjacent to this subdivision is zoned residential and industrial:_,= on the-North, residential and commercial on the-South, and residential and oil production r on the West. There is presently one producing oil well and-related. facilities on the subdivisio.n.property. .There have been other producing oil wells -and related facilities on the subdivision property in.the past. Aminoil, USA aka Signal Oil and Gas Company, Burman Oil and Gas Company, is located 1 1/2 miles Southwest of the project. Thirteen of an available 45 acres are currently being used to process Group II Wastes - drilling mud, dewatered sludges, quantity un- known; operated by Aminoil, USA, Inc. from 1962 until present. Bruce Brothers Pit aka Golden West Disposal Station #10 is located 1 1/8 miles North- west of the project and contains 32 acres of Group II Waste - municipal refuse, operated by the County and City between 1947 and 1962. Standard Oil Company disposal site is located 1 1/4 miles Northwest of the project and contains Group II and III Wastes; operated by Standard Oil of California from 1962 to 1974. Sully Miller Construction Company disposal site is located 1 mile Northwest of the project and contains 15 acres of Group II and III Wastes; operated by Sully Miller from 1970 until present. TAXES: The maximum amount of any tax on real property that can be collected annually by counties is 1% of the full cash value of the property. With the addition of interest and redemption charges on any indebtedness, approved by voters prior to July 1, 1978, the total property tax rate in most counties is approximately 1.25% of the full cash value. In some counties, the.total tax rate could be well above the 1.25% of the full cash value. For example, an issue of general obligation bonds previously approved by the voters and sold by a county water district, a sanitation district or other such district could increase the total tax. For the purchaser of a unit in this subdivision, the "full cash value" of the unit will be the valuation, as reflected on the tax roll, determined by the county assessor as of the date of purchase of the unit or as of the date of completion of an improvement on the unit if that occurs after the date of purchase. Page 8 of 10 File No: 056367LA-A02 ti - ti C�,r • ' Andrew R. Einhorn _- Glynis H. Hatcher 7311 Coho -* 103 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 AUGUST 16, 1990 CITY COUNCIL CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET 0 D HUNT I NGTON BEACH, CA 92648 �UG2 � 1990 ATTN MAYOR TOM MAYS Dear Tom, CITY of HUNG tNC;ON ICE CITY COUNCIL OFFICE We would like it to go on record, as residents of Pacific Ranch, that we Oppose the appeal of Permit number 90-16, made by the Huntington Beach Church of Religious Science for the following. reasons: • Traffic Congestion ' • Traffic Noise • Church Noise -related to air conditioning equipment -entrance & exit of over 2000 people. -weeknight meetings & services until 10:30 P.M. • Environmental Pollution • Extremely Close Proximity To Residential Homes • Current Business Offices Located In Office Park Will Also Be Affected Secondary To Parking Con j est i on • This Already Large Congregation Has No.Room For Growth in The Proposed Site It should be noted that the planning commission has already heard and denied this permit in a solid 6-1 defeat. We request that you follow the footsteps of the planning commision members and reject this permit so that an alternative site can be found that is more conducive to their members, as well as the community. Sincerely, Andrew R. Einhorn n iunis H. Hatcher Zr September 27 , 1990 O' c rn c� z .Connie Brockway , City Clerk `, City of Huntington Beach "`"` 2000 Main Street N F oR,r., ''-^�O Huntington Beach , Calif . 92648 , „ r Re : Conditional Use Permit No . 90- 16C= Church of Religious Science City Council Hearing October 1 , 1990 Item No . D-5 Dear Connie : As a resident of Pacific Ranch I am most concerned that the applicant has asked for a continuance regarding their application for a new church . The area in question is just not compatible for a facility of that size . I personally feel that even a church of any size would be unacceptable on that particular site . The church has had more than enough time to create parking and building plans . I urge you to let this issue be heard at the upcoming Council meeting on October 1 , 1990 . Please give this your kind attention . Sincerely, Wm. S . Yunek 7402 Coho Drive 110 Huntington Beach , Calif . 92648 cc : Council Members _,,_.�.�• is c=D - C�d Qis�i�✓ a � a _ ,U =-- Don G. Stephens " 7401-105 Seabluff Drive �C �'.L„ r:: - -- Huntington Beach, CA 92648 September 26 , 1990 c Re: Conditional Use Permit No. 90-16/ Negative Declaration No. 90-13 Mayor Tom Mays City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mayor Mays : I am a resident of Pacific Ranch and have just learned that the City has received a request from the Applicant for a continuance of the appeal hearing on the above referenced matter scheduled for the October 1 , 1990 City Council Meeting. I am unalterably opposed to the granting of a continuance for this hearing. Our Pacific Ranch Neighborhood Relations Committee has spent many hours in meetings and in preparation for this hearing and some people have rescheduled other commitments and vacations in order to attend. You will be receiving a similar communication from our Chairman, Andrew Einhorn. To grant this requested continuance would do irreparable harm to our cause, would cause unnecessary expense and would be grossly unfair to our many supporters who adamantly oppose this application. It has been over fourteen ( 14) weeks since this matter was first set for hearing before the Planning Commission on June 19 , 1990. This certainly should have been ample time for the Applicant to make the changes to his plans which he contends is the basis for their request for a continuance. As a matter of record, the Applicant has already made changes to his application on at least four ( 4) different occasions made known to the public. We feel the present City Council is unequivocally qualified to hear this appeal and this request for continuance should be denied so that this matter can be heard as scheduled on October 1 , 1990. I respectfully request your support to deny this request for continuance. An early advise of you decision would be appreciated. Sincerely, DGS: Don G. Stephens ** CERTIFIED MAIL ** cc: Ms. Connie Brockway, City Clerk ,5 �! Fold at line over top.of the return address Don G. Stephens 7401-105 Seabluff DriveCERTIFIED CA Huntington Beach, 92648 rtf P 994 Z73 7Z0 s":P.27'90 MAIL l Y Ms. Connie-Brockway, City Clerk City of Hunington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 1 ! September 26, 19N -7 •ti p - RECEIVED CITY CLERK CITY OF CITY COUNCIL HUtiT01G :':N 9`'4rl'.CALIF. CITY OF HUNT I NGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET $EP 29 '' 'g� HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 Re: Appeal-of Planning Commission Decision Conditional Use Permit No 90-16 Huntington Beach Church of Religious Science & Request For Continuance Of The Above Hearing Dear Council Members, It has come to my attention that a request has been placed for a continuance of the above referenced City Council hearing. I represent Pacific Ranch Homeowners Association and have been appointed chairman of the committee overseeing this project. Pacific Ranch residents are strongly opposed to the granting of this request. We feel that more than sufficient time has elapsed since the Planning Commission's decision was made against the proposed site being placed in such close proximity to a residential community. It is important to note that the applicant was not willing to accept Staff recommendations on occupancy and maximum numbers at the time of the last hearing before the Planning Commission. They are basing their continuance request on the time needed to meet with the land owner and architectural firm to create parking and building use modifications that will satisfy 'neighbors' who are resistant to the project. Considering that we are within less than fifty feet on three surrounding borders of their 'proposed' site, I must assume we are those 'neighbors' they are referring to. This application was denied by the Planning Commission on August 7. This allowed them 55 days in which to come up with an alternate plan, being more than aware of our objections. We have been notified by mail of the time and date of their appeal before the City Council, and many concerned residents have. canceled prior commitments, meetings, classes, etc. in order to attend this hearing and voice their concerns and objections. In addition to this, we have been in an emotional turmoil since being made aware of this project and it will do nothing but further upset our lives if this is postponed. R The Holidays are fast approaching, and we would like this issue resolved so that everyone may relax and appreciate these Important moments spent with our families. Anything less than the finding of an alternate site for their purposes will be considered unacceptable by the residents of Pacific Ranch. We are in agreement that no compromise can be met, given the close proximity to our homes and the subsequent problems this will create, as the residents have shared with you over the past several months. In all honesty, we consider this a stall tactic on the part of the applicant in order to await.the installing of new Council members who are unaraare of the entire situation and will possibly not be given the time needed to be informed by Pacific Ranch residents of the seriousness of the consequences to our community. We ask that you not allow this continuance to occur, based on the time frame that has already been given to the applicant, and on the fact that there is no alternate plan that will be acceptable to the residents of Pacific Ranch. Thank you very much for the time you have taken on this issue and for listening to the residents of your community. Sincerely, LL Andrew R. E i nhorn Chairman Pacific Ranch Committee Against 90-16 7311 Coho s 103 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714) 536-8094 cc: Tom Mays, Peter Green, Wes Bannister, Grace Winchell, John Erskine, Don Macailister, Jim Silva, Connie Brockway I I Connie Brockway City Clerk l Don G. Stephens RECEIVED 7401-105 Seabluff Drive CITY CLERK Huntington Beach, CA 92648 , CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH,CALIF. September 26 , 1990 SEP 27 10 03 A0 Q00 Re: Conditional Use Permit No. 90-16/ Negative Declaration No. 90-13 Mayor Tom Mays City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mayor Mays : I am a resident of Pacific Ranch and have just learned that the City has received a request from the Applicant for a continuance of the appeal hearing on the above referenced matter scheduled for the October 1 , 1990 City Council Meeting. I am unalterably opposed to the granting of a continuance for this hearing. Our Pacific Ranch Neighborhood Relations Committee has spent many hours in meetings and in preparation for this hearing and some people have rescheduled other commitments and vacations in order to attend. You will be receiving a similar communication from our Chairman, Andrew Einhorn. To grant this requested continuance would do irreparable harm to our cause, would cause unnecessary expense and would be grossly unfair to . our many supporters who adamantly oppose this application. It has been over fourteen ( 14) weeks since this matter was first set for hearing before the Planning Commission on June 19 , 1990. This certainly should have been ample time for the Applicant to make the changes to his plans which he contends is the basis for their request for a continuance. As a matter of record, the Applicant has already made changes to his application on at least four (4 ) different occasions made known to the public. We feel the present City Council is unequivocally qualified to hear this appeal and this request for continuance should be denied so that this matter can be heard as scheduled on October 1 , 1990. I respectfully request your support to deny this request for continuance. An early advise of you decision would be appreciated. Sincerely, DGS: Don G. Stephens cc: ** CERTIFIED MAIL ** Ms. Connie Brockway, City Clerk -7 Don G. Stephens 7401-105 Seabluff Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ' Ms. Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Hunington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 i Legal Notice: . . City of Huiitingtori Beach . Office of the City.Clerk P:O.Box 190 e .4 ti; r� �•" Huntington Beach, CA 92648 f SE, ' j - .„ ✓� -,. Lawrence Mi 7281 Coho D # 8 FrG Huntington Bea s2� _ 937-16-185 Gay Ftio e �� `• yG �„ �} FIRST CLASS MAIL HUNnNCTON ecACH 141.1f++1111111iii:lii!!i+lti+itilliliil+i!ii+!ltiii _z LegalNotice---— -- ----_ - - City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P. O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 V Elizabeth Davis L"D 3 7281 Coho Dr #� 2648 Huntington Bea , 1 4.4 937-16-184 yy yG� G FIRST CLASS MAIL a�� u ' z Legal Notice City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk 4 _ P. O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA.92648 Joann Kit awa Dr #20' 96 7302 yell 1 CA g2648 Hunti to 937-1�0 :r ` �� FIRST CLASS MAIL Legal Notice .. . ,. . _..- ---�----- -•�_. ..__ __ City of Hu_ ntington Beach Office Qf the City Clark =� ` PI (� 1 go ti !. - Huntington Beach CA.9264$ IWOWWO 40 RE 7� 7O Judith Heller 7371 Coho Dr #105 • Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-319 ,,,, ?{.TON aiArH FIRST CLASS MAID.. s' 11ll:i,lff�tl�i,ll{:11{l�t={�=I:I1l�!=1=II=f�==�flil . 1111{iilfilll�Illli�il=Iiillii�Ifi1=li1{Ililiifi1111 ' f i1I ! i 11 f 11 i ff f1 1 II1I f( (t II (( H,�y�o f�li')nil�ill+ -Ildw ssd-10 1.s8Ij ►� . SrA • t> Z6Z-51-L£6 0 VD go2ag uogbuiqunH 1 LL`of s # aQ TTVgmolle2� Z06L uviuTanoD TaOr lgo n tir. `o✓do 8b9Z6 da Veag uotBuilunH �l a 061, WS 'O A VeiD A1i0 04110 00141O 43e813 uolBul;unH ;o A113 0311ON 1e681 �IdW Ssd-lo 1S�1� H)Y)iNU!')NIIN,iI+ r� '/ 44 Q 8i7E-9T-LE6 goaag u0'buT,4ung u gsT3anT9 ZSE6T W .ti?s J7J, as;TJ PTpuog y 8a9Z6 b3'42ee8 uoOi4punH -Q ss ................... • .3 RV AIR, . .... ..... R T. ............ r: .......... Legal Notice City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P. O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 William Meisner 19351 Bluefil) L Huntington Be '; h 926r6 937-15-337 FIRST CLASS MAIL HLIKIINCTON BEACH ... .... .... .... .......... . ......... . ... ........ ............ Legal Notice City of Huntington Beach HuIf ice of the City Clerk P. O. Box 190 nngton Beach, CA 92648 Timothy Mi f:ko/C veltri 7402 Coho r jr #104 Huntington Beach CA 926 8 937-15-400 FIRST CLASS MAIL III IN 1 1.14C TON BEACH Authorized to Publish Advertisements of all kinds including public notices by Decree of the Superior Court of Orange County, California, Number A-6214, September 29, 1961, and A-24831 June 11,1963 STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Orange PUBLIC-NOTICE = r am a Citizen of the United States and a t :NoncE<oF i resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the PUBLIC HEARING. *'APPEAL tr„:; age of eighteen years, and not a a to or CONDITIONAL UBE P � � PERMIT NO.90-18� interested in the below entitled matter. I am a INEGATIVE:DECL'ARATION t principal clerk of the ORANGE COAST DAILY "Commi I i Planning' r Commis Appesion's°denial PILOT, a newspaper of general circulation, ofi request to 9 Permlt.cbnetruceen j printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa, ; of .church with. Joint-use of State of California and that :parking et ark County of Orange, � =OMlce Perk' ' attached Notice is a true and Complete copy as NOTICE the :HEREBY IaIVEN•�that the.Huntington Beach CityCouncil will-hold was printed and published in the Costa Mesa, :public hearing in the Coun- cil Chamber at the Hunt- Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Fountain ington Beach Civic Center, 4000 Main Street, Hunt- Valley, Irvine, the South Coast communities and jington Beach,Callfornia;:on 'd the' ate and at the•tlme in- Laguna Beach issues of said newspaper to wit Idicated-belowtoreceiveand consider the statements•of the issue(s) of: all persons-whb wishao-be heard.relative to'•the appll- . cation descrilied.,below. -. "DATE/TIME:.Monday,Oc-. tober 1,1990,7:00 PM- C APPLICATION`NUMBER: onditional•Use;P.erm-W No. 90-16/Negative Declaration No;90-13 A._ P. P L., I,. - September 21, 1990 In AN T/APPELLANT: H Re- ligious Science'.. LOCATION: Northeast corner.of Seacliff Office Park (northeast:of the Inter- section.of Yorktown Avenue and Main Street) ZONE:,OP-01-CD (Office Professional-Combined:with Oil Production and:Drilling- Civic District) REQUEST: Appeal of^the Planning Commission's•,de- i nial of a request-to permit construction of's two-story; 42,000.square foot"church with 1,835 seat capacity;In- cluding a one=levelsubterra- nean paPking:structure and Joint use of_,surfece:perkind! declare, under penalty of perjury, that the at Seacliff Offlce_Park. I ENVIR-O_.N_,.fv1ENTAL' foregoing is true and correct• S7ATU$ , :Covered, by' INegative Declaration' No: 0 190-13 which the Council will September 21 also act upon.:, p �99 ON FILE A.copy of the Executed on 1proposed iequest end'ap'. at Costa Mesa, California. peal is y file In the 0 ai l .the.City.Clerk,.200Malr IStreet,,"Huntington BeachI California 92648,for inspect wm Ition by the public. ALL INTERESTED',PER.',. ISONS'are invited to"attend Signature said hearing and. express opinions of sutimit dWaence: for or igalnst the application. las outlined above: if'there, are any .further questions,, please call'Laura Phillips, 1_ ,53 3 , �-Li Associate .Planner;'. at �536-5271. Connie Brockway,_ Olty PROOF OF PUBLICATION Clerk, CITY OF' HUNT- INGTON BEACH '- Published Orange Coastl vv Daily Pilot September 21, I1990 ` F-742 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90-16/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 90-13 (Appeal of Planning Commission' s denial of a request to permit construction of a church with joint use of parking at Seacliff Office Park) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, October 1, 1990, 7 : 00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Conditional Use Permit No . 90-16/Negative Declaration No . 90-13 APPLICANT/ APPELLANT: Huntington Beach Church of Religious Science LOCATION: Northeast corner of Seacliff Office Park (northeast of the intersection of Yorktown Avenue and Main Street) ZONE: OP-01-CD (Office Professional-Combined with Oil Production and Drilling-Civic District) REOUEST: Appeal of the Planning Commissions denial of a request to permit construction of a two-story, 42 , 000 square foot church with 1, 835 seat capacity, including a one-level subterranean parking structure and joint use of surface parking at Seacliff Office Park. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Covered by Negative Declaration No . 90-13 , which the Council will also act upon. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request and appeal is on file in the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648 , for inspection by the public. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If there are any further questions please call Laura Phillips , Associate Planner, at 536-5271 . Connie Brockway City Clerk (6946d) to v`' HUNTINGTON BEACH CHURCH OF RELIGIOUS SCIENCE PEGGY BASSETT,Minister August 14, 1990 G 2 Z C"� Ms . Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach j 2000- Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 = Q T Dear Ms. Brockway: F We, Huntington Beach Church of Religious_ Science, the applicant, wish to appeal to the City Council the decision of the Planning Commission to deny the Conditional Use Permit #90-16 to allow the church use of the property at the Seacliff Office Park. Our check for $200 . 00' is_ enclosed for the filing of this appeal. Please advise if there is any additional information required. Sincer , Rev. ger W. Teel, D.D. Asso ' to Minister ,121 / . ze EACLIFF VILLAGE, EE 2�MAIN STREET,HUNTINGTON BEACH,CALI IA 926 !/ TELEPHONE(714)969-1331 C Hanes Menser Architects AIA Incorporated seacliff office park 2120 main street suite 200 huntington beach california 92648 (714)536-2009 fax (714)536-6391 September 18 , 1990 City of Huntington Beach Department of Community Development 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach , CA 92648 Attn : Laura Phillips Re : CUP-90- 16 / Church of Religious Science (Appeal ) 89105.00 Laura : The certified ownership list subm; tted 09/ 17/90 is based on County tax roll data as of 10/ 15/89 with monthly updates through July 31 , 1990. 1 hope this is sufficient for your needs . Cordially , HANES MENSER ARCHITECTS A. I .A. , INC. Thomas Menser A. I .A. TM/ rr CERTLEICATION ON PROPERTY OWNERSHIP LIST THE ATTACHED LIST REPRESENTS THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PROPERTY OWNERS LOCATED WITHIN 300 FEET OF THE EXTERIOR BOUNDARIES OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT See attached Map THIS INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED FROM THE LATEST ORANGE COUNTY ASSESSMENT ROLLS. SUSAN W. CASE 1461 Glenneyre St #F Laguna Beach CA 92651 714-494-6105 Hanes Menser Architects AIA Incorporated seaciiff office park 2120 main street suite 200 huntington beach caiifornia 92648 (714)536-2009 fax (714)536-6391 September 17 , 1990 City of Huntington Beach Department of Community Development 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach , CA. 92648 Attn : Laura Phillips Re : CUP-90- 16 / Church of Religious Science (Appeal ) Laura : Inclosed is the 300 foot ownership list as you requested . It is certified to be the latest available. Cordially ,HANES MENSER ARCHITECTS A. I .A. , INC. (((1116� / U PMenmasser A. I .A. TM/ rr -3 �� J& CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH i To Planning Department From Connie Brockway v City Clerk Subject Notification Labels - Date September 6, 1990 Conditional Use Permit No. 90-16 & Negative Declaration No. 90-13 This notification list is from the 1989 rolls according to the First American Title Insurance Company. (See page 2 of the Title Guarantee Letter.) They dated their letter 8/29/90, however, they informed this office that the rolls used are 1989 and that they will not have 1990 rolls until December. from the desk of: CONNIE BROCKWAY, CMC CITY CLERK (714) 536-5404 01 aie. P.O. BOX 190 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 0994K Dew I.rw_�t., l� aukcP � ��-�bC Co.,fe. �.O��n P� ro�k,Aar� -�- ry� iv� r� � ��e � Sh Q � II fits ,- � aJ�e,Is ? � ��u�c hrr � I Page 8 623 i Eric Friedland Vincent Malazita Kristina Susac 7281 Coho Dr #201 7262 Yellowtail Dr #201 7291 Coho Dr #102 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-16-179 937-16-189 937-16-199 Maurice Jensen Ruth Luna Mary Underwood 7281 Coho Dr #101 7262 Yellowtail Dr #101 7291 Coho Dr #103 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-16-180 937-16-190 937-16-200 Alan Nicolette Bent Christensen Ethel Girard 7281 Coho Dr #203 7262 Yellowtail Dr #203 7291 Coho Dr #104 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-16-181 937-16-191 937-16-201 John Littleton Eugene Gillam Timothy Reid 7281 Coho Dr #102 7262 Yellowtail Dr #102 7291 Coho Dr #105 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-16-182 937-16-192 937-16-202 Laurie Gaylord Nejat Kirmaci Richard Theer 7281 Coho Dr #204 7262 Yellowtail Dr #. 204 7291 Coho Dr #106 Huntington Beach CA.92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-16-183 937-16-193 937-16-203 Elizabeth Davis Joyce Babbidge Stephen Raznick 7281 Coho Dr # 7262 Yellowtail Dr #103 7291 Coho Dr #107 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648., 937-16-184 937-16-194 937-16-204 Lawrence Miller Fred Boyd Maria Sugranes 7281 Coho Dr #185 7262 Yellowtail Dr #206 7291 Coho Dr #108 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-16-185 937-16-195 937-16-205 Leon Heimkes Carole Bonnet Pacific Ranch Homeowners 7281 Coho Dr #104 7262 Yellowtail Dr #104 520 Broadway #100 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Santa Monica CA 90401 937-16-186 937-16-196 023-401-02 Claire De Lany Martin GAllegos 7281 Coho Dr #205 7262 Yellowtail Dr #205 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-16-187 937-16-197 Joseph Langdon Rickey Williams 7262 Yellowtail Dr # 202 7291 Coho Dr #101 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-16-188 937-16-198 I Page 7 623 Doris Harder Gerard Street Brian Homsy 7331 Coho Dr #101 7321 Coho Dr #201 7311 Coho Dr #201 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-16-064 937-16-073 937-16-169 I Jan Wine Audrie Kim Kenneth Andrews 7331 Coho Dr #102 7321 Coho Dr #101 7311 Coho Dr #101 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648. Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-16-065 937-16-074 937-16-170 Ma Corazon Liamzon Dolores Calgi Douglas Romeo 7331 Coho Dr #103 7321 Coho Dr #203 7311 Coho Dr #203 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-16-066 937-16-075 937-16-171 Paul Schoen John Scheffler Carla Singer 7331 Coho Dr #104 7321 Coho Dr #102 7311 Coho Dr #102 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-16-067 937-16-076 937-16-172 Siw Bennett Tyra Moore Curtis Jones 7331 Coho Dr #105 7321 Coho Dr #204 7311 Coho Dr #204 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-16-068 937-16-077 937-16-173 David Dekoker Linda Plummer Andrew Einhorn 7331 Coho Dr #106 7321 Coho Dr #103 7311 Coho Dr #103 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-16-069 937-16-078 937-16-174 Becky Conway Terrence Giannone Neil Rasmussen 19747 Shorecliff Ln 7321 Coho Dr #206 7311 Coho Dr #206 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-16-070 937-16-079 937-16-175 James Shirley Selma Merles Maria Thyrring 7331 Coho Dr #108 852 Santiago Rd 10326 Stone Ct Huntington Beach CA 92648 Costa Mesa CA 92626 Mentone CA 92359 937-16-071 937-16-080 937-16-176 David Brahms Kathleen Simmons Robert Kaster 7321 Coho Dr #202 7321 Coho Dr #205 7311 Coho Dr #205 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-16-072 937-16-081 937-16-177 I Ralph Dortenzio ! Melvin Waldron 7311 Coho Dr # 202 7281 Coho Dr #202 Huntington Beach CA 92648 j Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-16-168 937-16-178 i I � Page 6 623 i John Martin i Roger Johnson i Kathryn Lemley 7322 Yellowtail Dr #104 7302 Yellowtail Dr #202 ' . 7282 Yellowtail Dr #202 Huntington Beach CA 92648 I Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-16-034 937-16-044 937-16-54 I Willis Anderson Charles Shortridge i Frank Huff 22802 Dominita Rd 19761 Deep Harbor Dr 7282 Yellowtail Dr #201 Laguna Niguel CA 92677 Huntington Beach CA 92648 I Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-16-035 937-16-045 937-16-055 Royce Mitchell Bettie Muscovich I Maria Gonzalez 7341 Coho Dr #101 7302 Yellowtail Dr #101 7282 Yellowtail Dr #101 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-16-036 937-16-046 i 937-16-056 i Eugene Ernst Martin Sewall Seth Ellison 7341 Coho Dr #102 7302 Yellowtail Dr #203 7282 Yellowtail Dr #203 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-16-037 937-16-047 937-16-057 Tyler Brinker Michael Mayeaux Vicki Lucas 8122 Wadebridge 7302 Yellowtail Dr #102 7282 Yellowtail Dr #102 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-16-038 937-16-048 937-16-58 Richard Driskill Keni Lorenz David Graham 19400 Beach Blvd #5B 7302 Yellowtail Dr #204 7282 Yellowtail Dr #204 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-16-039 937-16-049 937-16-059 Heather Mahood John Kimes John Fechter 7341 Coho Dr #105 13191 Contessa 7282 Yellowtail Dr #103 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Tustin CA 92680 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-16-040 937-16-050 937-16-060 Toshihiko Nagaoka Michael Nelson Andre Javardian 7341 Coho Dr #106 7302 Yellowtail Dr #206 7282 Yellowtail Dr #206 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-16-041 937-16-051 937-16-061 I Sheila Abrahamian Marsha Pryer John Donnelly 7341 Coho Dr #107 7302 Yellowtail Dr #104 7282 Yellowtail Dr #104 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-16-042 937-16-052 937-16-062 I I William Stephens Joann Kitagawa Richard Morris 7341 Coho Dr #108 7302 Yellowtail Dr #20 7282 Yellowtail Dr #205 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 i Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-16-043 937-16-053 937-16-063 Page 5 623 I j William Crawford - - -" --- - -- p Melvin Phuko - - - -John -Drake-_.-_- --- ---- -- --- 7412 Seabluff Dr #105 I P 0 Box 4792 7351 Coho Dr #106 Huntington Beach CA 92648 ( Palm Desert CA 92261 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-437 937-16-014 937-16-024 I Delia Carrasco David Buddecke Tina Livingstone 7412 Seabluff Dr #106 7351 Coho Dr #203 7351 Coho Dr #207 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-438 937-16-015 937-16-025 I j I Robert Pierson I Richard Hayes Sandra Thomson 7412 Seabluff Dr #107 7351 Coho Dr #102 7322 Yellowtail Dr #202 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-439 + 937-16-016 937-16-026 I , i - i Sharon Upstill Melvin Roberson Ben Trainer 7412 Seabluff Dr #108 7351 Coho Dr #204 2364 3rd St Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 San Francisco CA 94107 937-15-440 937-16-017 937-16-027 Jeff Saccacio Emil Pansini John Foster Sr 7412 Seabluff Dr #109 15 Monte Carlo 7322 Yellowtail Dr #101 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Irvine CA 92714 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-441 937-16-018 937-16-028 Don Jones Joseph Di Ianni Charles Lamah 7412 Seabluff Dr #110 7351 Coho Dr #205 7322 Yellowtail Dr #203 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-442 i 937-16-019 937-16-029 Jeffrey Joy Dorothy Wallace Sang Choe 7412 Seabluff Dr #111 7351 Coho Dr #104 7322 Yellowtail Dr # Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach. CA 92648 937-15-443 937-16-020 937-16-030 Margot Achenbach Timothy Lien Steven Rousseau 7412 Seabluff Dr #112 7351 Coho Dr #206 7322 Yellowtail Dr #204 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-.444 937-16-021 937-16-031 Margaret Stapenhorst Abolghassem Madani Yoobong Kim 7351 Coho Dr #202 7351 Coho Dr #105 7322 Yellowtail Dr #103 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-16-012 937-16-022 937-16-032 is i McKinley Cheshire i Carole Chomik Diane Ets-Hokin 7351 Coho Dr #201 7351 Coho Dr #208 7322 Yellowtail Dr #206 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-16-013 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-16-023 937-16-033 I i Page 4 623 Thomas Hood Carla Harris j Donald Griswold 7402 Coho Dr #107 7371 Seabluff Dr #105 I 19501 Ranch Ln #103 Huntington Beach CA 92648 i Huntington Beach CA 92648 j Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-403 i 937-15-417 ' 937-15-427 Paul Loreto j James Reed William Reid 7402 Coho Dr #108 7371 Seabluff Dr #106 19501 Ranch Ln #104 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-404 937-15-418 937-15-428 i Edmond Copelin M Clifton Hewlett Chester Donaldson 7402 Coho Dr #109 7371 Seabluff Dr #107 19501 Ranch Ln #105 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15--405 937-15-419 937-15-429 William Yunek Deborah Manning Nancy Treister 7402 Coho Dr #110 7371 Seabluff Dr #108 19501 Ranch Ln #106 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-406 937-15-420 937-15-430 Dorohty Steege Wing Ow Yash Subberwal 7402 Coho Dr #111 7371 Seabluff Dr #109 19501 Ranch Ln #107 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-407 937-15-421 937-15-431 Robert Lofe Kathleen Watts Anthony Di Giorgio 7402 Coho Dr #112 7371 Seabluff Dr #110 19501 Ranch Ln #108 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-408 937-15-422 937-15-432 Dennis Olson Howard Warner John Crossley 7371 Seabluff Dr #101 7371 Seabluff Dr #111 7412 Seabluff Dr #101 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-413 937-15-423 937-15-433 Henry Schulthesz William Guffey Bjorn Moller 7371 Seabluff Dr #102 7371 Seabluff Dr #112 7412 Seabluff Dr #102 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-414 937-15-424 937-15-434 Samuel Smith Tom Digiorgio Roger House 7371 Seabluff Dr #103 19501 Ranch Ln #101 7412 Seabluff Dr #103 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-415 937-15-425 937-15-435 Hidenori Ishii Pauline Harbin Robert Kellberg 7371 Seabluff Dr #104 19501 Ranch Ln #102 7412 Seabluff Dr #104 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-416 j 937-15-426 937-15-436 Page 3 623 ! Harry Gordon I Edward Hoffineister H Stanley Ishikawa 19431 Ranch Ln #101 19431 Ranch Ln #111 7401 Seabluff Dr #109 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-373 937-15-383 937-15-393 Paul Murphy Gordon Rozen Richard Doss 19431 Ranch Ln #102 19431 Ranch Ln #112 7401 Seabluff Dr #110 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-374 937-15-384 937-15-394 I Robert Blake Martha Monroe I Donald Eide 19431 Ranch Ln #103 7401 Sea Bluff Dr #101 7401 Seabluff Dr #111 Huntington Beach CA 92648 I Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-375 I 937-15-385 I 937-15-395 Gerald Mulholland Gary Kuhn Alfred Gaspar 9922 Constitution Dr 7401 Sea Bluff Dr #102 7401 Seabluff Dr #112 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937--15-376 937-15-386 937-15-396 i Frank Williams Marilyn Dunn Phillip Zeidenberg 19431 Ranch Ln #105 7401 Sea Bluff Dr #103 7402 Coho Dr #101 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-377 937-15-387 937-15-397 Alan Vanderpool Robert Yamamoto George Giacoppe 19431 Ranch Ln #106 7401 Seabluff Dr #104 7402 Coho Dr #102 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-378 937-15-388 937-15-398 Donald Hartman Don Stephens Jeffrey Haysom 19431 Ranch Ln #107 7401 Seabluff Dr #105 7402 Coho Dr #103 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-379 937-15-389 937-15-399 Raymond Ward Patricia Huskins Timothy Misko/C Veltri 19431 Ranch Ln #108 7401 Seabluff Dr #106 7402 Coho Dr #104 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-380 937-15-390 937-15-400 I Lisa Raver Frank Pickett Elinor Work 19431 Ranch Ln #109 7401 Seabluff Dr. #107 7402 Coho Dr #105 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-381 937-15-391 937-15-401 j i Roy Sharp Mitchell Kietzman Geraldine PErkins 19431 Ranch Ln #110 255 Lafayette Ave 10550 Dunlap Crossing Rd Huntington Beach CA 92648 Staten Island NY. 10301 ! Whittier CA 90606 937-15-382 937-15-392 j 937-15-402 I Page 3 623 Jeff Kristol Sandra Baxter David Cowen 19351 Bluefish Ln #206 19352 Bluefish Ln #204 7442 Coho Dr #103 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-343 937-15-353 937-15-363 Exchanged Titles i Joe Galvan Leonard Johnson 9572 Scotstoun Dr 19352 Bluefish Ln #104 7442 Coho Dr #104 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-344 937-15-354 937-15-364 I I Peggy Mc Intosh Jeanette Ryan Muriel Summers 19351 Bluefish Ln #106 + 19352 Bluefish Ln #205 7442 Coho Dr #105 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-345 937-15-355 937-15-365 i Herbert Collins Theresa Rullo J D Winscott 19351 Bluefish Ln #208 19352 Bluefish Ln #105 7442 Coho Dr #106 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-346 937-15-356 937-15-366 i Ann Krueger Bobbie Frech Kenneth Rohde 19352 Bluefish Ln 4101 19352 Bluefish Ln #206 7442 Coho Dr #107 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-347 I 937-15-357 937-15-367 ' I Ronald Fifer Jeffrey Millikan Clyde Cronkhite 19352 Bluefish Ln #210 19352 Bluefish Ln #207 7442 Coho Dr #108 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-348 937-15-358 937-15-368 Gary Prunty Jeffrey Barton Gloria Cowan 19352 Bluefish Ln #203 19352 Bluefish Ln #106 7442 Coho Dr #109 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-349 937-15-359 937-15-369 Shirley Goodman Lois Leslie Robie Edwards 19352 Bluefish Ln #102 19352 Bluefish Ln #208 7442 Coho Dr #110 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-350 937-15-360 937-15-370 Mary Martin Gary Burket James Morton 19352 Bluefish Ln #103 7442 Coho Dr #101 7442 Coho Dr #111 Huntington Beach CA 92648 1 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-352 937-15-361 j 9377 15-371 i ' I Jerry Kaufman William Mc Carty Kangro Yoon 19352 Bluefish Ln #203 7442 Coho Dr #102 7442 Coho Dr #112 Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 � Huntington I Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-351 I 937-15-362 937-15-372 _'age 2 623 .. i Gregory Rowe William Haggerty Florence Garratt 7362 Yellowtail Dr #104 7381 Coho Dr #101 19351 Bluefish Ln #101 Huntington Beach CA 92648 I Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-313 937-15-323 i 937-15-333 Julie Wilhelm Allan .Hirata Robert Kerin 7362 Yellowtail Dr #206 7381 Coho Dr #201 19351 Bluefish Ln #201 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-314 937-15-324 937-15-334 i Joseph Truxaw Michael Menkes i Randi Warner 7371 Coho Dr #101 ; 7381 Coho Dr #202 19351 Bluefish Ln #202 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-315 ! 937-15-325 937-15-335 I � Velma Phillips Ronda Wood Matthew Gray Jr 7371 Coho Dr #102 4 Andissa 19351 Bluefish Ln #102 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Irvine CA 92714 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-316 937-15-326 937-15-336 i i. James Corbett Nicholas Cook William Meisner 7371 Coho Dr #103 7381 Coho Dr #203 19351 Bluefish Ln #203 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-317 937-15-327 937-15-337 Linda Baker Elaine Johnson Djava Kashefinejad 7371 Coho Dr #104 7381 Coho Dr #103 19351 Bluefish Ln #103 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-318 937-15-328 937-15-338 Judith Heller James Waterhouse Glen Fox 7371 Coho Dr #105 7381 Coho Dr #204 19351 Bluefish Ln #204 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-319 937-15-329 937-15-339 John French Horace Bray Barbara Updike 1722 Lake St 7381 Coho Dr #205 19351 Bluefish Ln #104 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-320 937-15-330 937-15-340 i Patrick Devaney Brian Adair Ronald Roesch 8842 Fry Cr ; 7381 Coho Dr #104 19351 Bluefish Ln #205 Huntington Beach CA 92646 1 Huntington Beach CA 92648 I Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-321 937-15-331 937-15-341 John Moyer Matthew Donovan Ruth Swanstrom 7371 Coho Dr #108 7381 Coho Dr #206 19351 Bluefish Ln #105 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-322 i 937-15-332 937-15-342 n, & Yorktown Ave 623 Huntington Beach CA 300' Listing 023-010-19 --September--1-4--1990 -� - -- - - -- ----- - Page 1 � I Huntington Beach Co/Chevron f Tim Shumate William Lee P 0 Box 7611 7402 Yellowtail Dr #203 7402 Yellowtail Dr #208 San Francisco CA 94120 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 023-010-10,13,18,19, 937-15-295 1 937-15-304 City of Huntington Beach Billy Flaherty Martin Ruby P 0 Box 190 5200 Carriage Way #101 7362 Yellowtail Dr #101 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Rolling Meadows IL 60008 Huntington Beach CA 92648 023-010-15 937-15-296 937-15-305 Pacific Ranch Ranch Homeowners Tyzzdwo Lu Farzin Kamkari 520 Broadway #100 7402 Yellowtail Dr #204 7362 Yellowtail Dr #201 Santa Monica CA 90401 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 023-010-21 937-15-297 .937-15-306 i Huntington Beach School Gregory Davison Ruben Rosales 10251 Yorktown Ave 7402 Yellowtail Dr #104 7362 Yellowtail Dr #202 ton Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington� g 023-020-03 937-15-298 937-15-307 i i Civic Center Partnership Wayne Brandt Virginia Stellato 485 E 17th St #600 7402 Yellowtail Dr #205 7362 Yellowtail Dr #102 Costa Mesa CA 92627 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 02.3-033-01,040-06 937-15-299 937-15-308 Dorothy Kelly Joseph Gardner Virginia George 7402 Yellowtail Dr #101 7402 Yellowtail Dr #105 7362 Yellowtail Dr #203 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-291 937-15-300 937-15-309 Joel Covelman Maurice Hill Adolph Mayer 7402 Yellowtail Dr #210 7402 Yellowtail Dr #206 7362 Yellowtail Dr #103 Huntin Huntington Beach CA 92648 ton Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 g 937-15-292 937-15-301 937-15-310 i Tony Montoya James Sankey Arlene Key 7402 Yellowtail Dr #202 7402 Yellowtail Dr #207 1 83 Finisterra Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Irvine CA 92714 937-15-293 937-15-302 1 937-15-311 Daniel Hill Jr Sandra Wallman Larry Diamond 7402 Yellowtail Dr #102 7402 Yellowtail Dr #106 7362 Yellowtail Dr #205 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-294 i 937-15-303 937-15-312 I i 1 I Hanes Menser Architects AIA j Incorporated :o CID o t1mNN U 7 10 e'1 City of Huntington Beach a v Department of Community Development 2000 Main Street o g Huntington Beach„ CA 92648 N C N � Attn: Laura Phillips C r y;UUAM Mdt�116�-� yby�titl4;#i 1 r WILL"D RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT A P P L I E D R E A 1. ESTATE TECHNOLOGY September 20, 1990 x it�n Lo Ms. Connie Brockway :d rn o City Clerk Un ;X City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 0 RE: conditional use permit No. 90-16 for the Huntington Beach Church of Religious Science City Counsel Hearing on October 1, 1990 Dear Connie: Z represent Huntington Beach Church of Religious science in their C.U.P. application for a new church location at the SeaCliff Office Park. I have spoken to Shelley Stice (Mike Adam' s secretary) about the church's request for a continuance of the above referenced City Council hearing. After conferring with Mike, Shelley instructed me that a letter to you would °suffice to request both the continuance and the delay of the hearing notification mailing to the neighborhood. The church is working with the Huntington Beach Company, the land l�- owner, and Hanes Mencer and Associates, the architectural firm, to create parking and building use modifications that will satisfy the neighbors who are resistant to the project. We do not have sufficient time prior to October 1 for design modifications and exploration of church operational alternatives. We need at least 60 more days and prefer to wait to seta hearing date until we are closer to completion of our plan changes. I will follow this letter with a phone call on Friday, September 21, to confirm this request. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. Sincerely,f Thomas E. Willard 0 .. 7 Stillwater, Irvine • (714) 854-6445 Mailing Address: P.-O. Box 4377 • Irvine, California 92716-43.77 ' I StNI tiY,� y-21-5U y;UUAM Mtltii11bb-4 y0ybb ;; 1 - w�►rirsrr��i�arrc F A C S I M I L E T R A N. S M I T T A L F 0 R M DATE. 47 �; le-a OF PAGES ( INCLUDING TRANSMITTAL FORM) : r TO: CONTACT NAME CjL/Ce'GCe�c(�5! FAX V: COMPANY LET% �l A171111 �2�. ��2:c�•� FROM: / C � �//��l G - PHONE 9: 7 •- 17 '��Ta� Aea.e c_ tlG i rc 1,c TRANSMITTED VIAc MAIL BOXES ETC. FAX 714) 559-5487 City of Huntington Beach J Office of the'City Clerk i P:O. Box 190 ,i e'. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 1 David Buddecke 7351 Coho Dr #203 0 Huntington Beach CA 92.648. `: 937R16-015 I $ S 9�fa'#1°Ir3.E31I I $ .:0 it3tit"9�� DUE S >� SAV FIRST CLASS MAILt HUNIIVCT(1N BEACH - i Legal Notice City of Huntington Beach - .. Office of the City Clerk P. O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 - J7 i Joseph Di Ianni 7351 Coho Dr #205 Huntington Beach CA.92648 937-16-019 I 011A351 92b4A10E1+ 1784 094-4/90 0XIANNIr MSEPH MOMED LEFT NO WORESS RWARO Td S NDEA FIRST CLASS MAIL HUNIINCTON RACH Legal Notice City of Huntington Beach Office of the City..Cierk = P. O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 . 1 t John Crossley 7412 Seabluf.f Dr #101 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-15-433 m©`i%w. v%4 1017 - 14ag- .09/34/4t5 'FOR IN TIME EXPIRED �. �r x� - t1�WER FIRST CLASS MAIL . .. HUNIINCTON$[ACH .• ;Legal Nonce "• = ---•• City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P:0. Box 190 - Huntington Beach CA 92648 1 i j Marsha Pryer 7302 Yellowtail Dr #104,:: Huntington Beach CA 92648 • 4'�7-1 ti-D52 # t Y t R i4 3.QB. 14a9 09/24/90 WN, pr 7439 ,,,,�HNGT„N.EACH FIRST CLASS MAIL City of Huntington Beach Office of the City-Clerk `` -:- P. 0. BOX 190 ; Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Keni Lorenz 7302 Yellowtail Dr 4204 Huntington Beach CA 9264:8K 937-16-049 , LaA930B 9ifF3441024 14aS 09/24/90 ;,-.. FORWARDIN1*1--TIME EXPIRED TUR Td SOUR FIRST CLASS MAIL A JK l INC TON BEACH. . uttice of the City Clerk P.0. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 9264$ ? = Royce Mitchell 7341 Coho Dr #101 Huntington Beach CA 92648 937-16-036 t ITC343 Xqc"-!w4&j()i7 9 r.914/40 EMIR Tt FlRS1' CLASS MAIL TURN rd S64 HUNIINGTON BEACH T =T--- r f-- \ { t \ J 3 Yy > - i t i 1 - - 1 i - / Y s 1t L-s, t , L J ";.t r; I�- } i -y_ i i - Fr i t 1 4 t k___- .. _ - -. ._. ...-...r- - -.._. .,. .. ._. ... t. t F- Y -- 1. v7tti _ f - r t•,.. t - tit. .C..'iv.a t . t X U 3�x S_1 '%fJ 4 r..Jf r - 1 - F ".. _ r : I.- F- S7 JsT' .?,pL - z .c.r t { v,s =,xy`"_*�t r i-i.J..+_ x ,,rr f t t- 3 .tom-F,iCx' t� -_x - .w_ >wi rod" -v- a.✓-rr"i,- Sr'F Y y. � s . .: l J CAI. -A .1 �J i _ - - _ c:. .-.♦ ._ - -•_ . -; - r c - - 1 �.T ,� . . - _ . S. - - _ ,`-. F.x - .. - .: -. _i - - .. -- t- - - - .. . Cc—-- J - - -.'..xw:..r..s.irJsnnw.,mw.i:.i'd.+♦:ar.et:iei.u.�nrk.'a .: •• ... LJ.�_ _ - - ---. .—.._.a. ..., - ._..,_.._.___., .. .. Office of the City Clerk1. . City of Huntington Beach - P.O.BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 : - V • J 1.913? �Frorel.ine Lams_ No . . i2 Hun t). ngron r!e "I, f' A G. 4f, Ai J .-. i "1 c— ?aft r-'I l�'j� lf�C+twt��, ft( FILE RETURN! TO EWS.R.�`:_� c lx t.. r PNA. C,0 s' .. Wm. S . Yiinek pm N Q� 7402 Coho Drive 110 z ., ��.e..... Huntington Beach , Calif . 92648 s, 21 SEP Yosemice_ ' i� Connie Brockwa , City Clerk City of Huntington Beach p 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach , Calif . 92648 i i I ��iitses?s?s.�f+si�et�lss?sss?sllssslt��sss�?,t�!es:i