Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPub Hear-Appeal by Mobil Oil Co., Oil Max & L.C. Smull dba B ExxonMobil Refining and Supply Company Global Remediation—U.S.Retail Projects 601 Jefferson Street Houston,TX 77001 ExxonMobil Refining and Supply Company Global Remediation— U.S. Retail Projects June 14, 2001 VIA REGULAR MAEL o c c z City of Huntington Beach -Public Works Department _ 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA, 92648 __J Att: Risk Management -U M w Re: Notification of Name Change for Mobil Oil Corporation w .= N To Whom It May Concern: I am writing on behalf of ExxonMobil Oil Corporation to advise you that, with an effective date of June 1, 2001, Mobil Oil Corporation has changed its name to.ExxonMobil Oil Corporation. This is a change in name only. It is not a change in the owner, operator or control of the corporation or of any facility. All facility operations and operating conditions will remain the same. Accordingly, this is to request that the name "Mobil Oil Corporation" be changed to 'ExxonMobil Oil Corporation" for all permits and/or licenses listed in Attachment A to this letter. In addition, please find the additional documentation requested, as listed on Attachment A. Should you have any questions about this request, please call Sam Webb at (617) 535-4018. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Very truly yours, Vv Dan Stevens Region Manager ExxonMobil Refining and Supply Company Global Remediation -U.S. Retail Projects a. incorporation of site landscape,particularly along street frontages and in parking lots; b. linkage of buildings by common architectural design, landscape and pedestrian systems, to avoid the appearance of independent freestanding structures surrounded by parking; The proposed structure incorporates variable massing and modulation, a gazebo structure and open space trellis screen, providing an interesting facade along Adams Avenue. The building design incorporates quality architectural treatment on all sides. 5. The Planning Commission finds that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment and is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)pursuant to section 15303, Class 3 of the CEQA Guidelines, because the project is designed for an occupant load of 30 persons or less and will not be constructed in conjunction with the building of four or more such structures. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 98-89: 1. The site plan, floor plans and elevations received and dated March 25, 1999 shall be the conceptually approved layout for the subject parcel and shopping center parcel with the following modifications: a. Elevations shall depict the proposed colors in accordance with the colors and materials palette dated March 25, 1999. b. Parking lot striping detail shall comply with Chapter 231 of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and Title 24, California Administrative Code. (Code Requirement) c. Depict all utility apparatus, such as but not limited to back flow devices and Edison transformers on the site plan. Utility meters shall be screened from view from public rights-of-way. Electric transformers in a required front or street side yard shall be enclosed in subsurface vaults. Backflow prevention devices shall be prohibited in the front yard setback and shall be screened from view. (Code Requirement) d. All exterior mechanical equipment shall be screened from view on all sides. Rooftop mechanical equipment shall be setback 15 feet from the exterior edges of the building. Equipment to be screened includes, but is not limited to, heating, air conditioning, refrigeration equipment,plumbing lines, ductwork and transformers. Said screening shall be architecturally compatible with the building in terms of materials and colors. If screening is not designed specifically into the building, a rooftop mechanical equipment plan showing screening must be submitted for review and approval with the application for building permit(s). (Code Requirement) e. Depict all gas meters, water meters, electrical panels, air conditioning units, mailbox facilities and similar items on the site plan and elevations. If located on a building, they shall be architecturally designed into the building to appear as part of the building. They shall be architecturally compatible with the building and non-obtrusive, not interfere with sidewalk areas and comply with required setbacks. f. If outdoor lighting is included, energy saving lamps shall be used. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties and shall be shown on the site plan and elevations. g. The parking lot restriping plan for the shopping center parcel (including Carl's Jr.) shall be improved with landscaping improvements valued at a minimum of 10,000 dollars. 2. Prior to issuance of grading permits the following shall be completed: a. The developer shall submit a Landscape Construction Set,prepared by a licensed Landscape Architect, to the Park, Tree and Landscape Division for their approval showing all proposed plantings for the subject parcel and adjacent shopping center. The Landscape Construction Set must be approved by the Departments of Public Works and Planning. The Landscape Construction Set shall include a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State Licensed Landscape Architect which identifies the location, type, size and quantity of all existing plant materials on the subject parcel and adjacent shopping center to remain, existing plant materials to be removed, and proposed plant materials; an irrigation plan; a grading plan; an approved site plan and a copy of the entitlement conditions of approval. The landscape plans shall be in conformance with Chapter 232 of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and applicable Design Guidelines and condition l.g. herein. Any existing mature trees that must be removed shall be replaced at a two to one ratio (2:1) with minimum 36 inch box trees and shall be incorporated into the project's landscape plan. (PW) (Code Requirement) b. A grading plan,prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. (PW) c. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered engineer. This analysis shall.include on-site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendation for grading, chemical and fill properties, retaining walls, streets, and utilities. (PW) d. A "Water Quality Management Plan" shall be prepared in accordance with NPDES requirements by a Civil or Environmental Engineer. (PW) 3. Prior to submittal for building permits, the following shall be completed: a. Zoning entitlement conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on the cover page of all the working drawing sets used for issuance of building permits (architectural, structural, electrical, mechanical and plumbing). b. All Fire Department requirements per these conditions shall be noted on the building plans. (FD). c. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer and submitted with the building permit application. This analysis shall include on-site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding: grading, foundations, retaining walls, streets, utilities, and chemical and fill properties of underground items including buried pipe and concrete and the protection thereof. (Code Requirement) d. An engineering geologist shall be engaged to submit a report indicating the ground surface acceleration from earth movement for the subject property. All structures within this development shall be constructed in compliance with the g- factors as indicated by the geologist's report. Calculations for footings and structural members to withstand anticipated g-factors shall be submitted to the City for review prior to the issuance of building permits. (Code Requirement) 4. Prior to issuance of building permits, the following shall be completed: a. Submit copy of the revised site plan, floor plans and elevations pursuant to Condition No. 1 for review and approval and inclusion in the entitlement file to the Planning Department. b. A grading permit shall be issued. (PW) c. All Public Works fees shall be paid. (PW- Code Requirements) d. Floors shall be designed to drain to an approved oil separator or trap discharging to sewers in accordance with the Plumbing Code per UBC 311.2.3.1. (BD) e. Automatic sprinkler systems shall be installed in the basement area per Uniform Building Code Section 904.2.2 and the Huntington Beach Fire Code Section 1003.2.2. Shop drawings shall be submitted and approved by the Fire Department prior to system installation. (FD) f. A fire alarm system will be installed to comply with Huntington Beach Fire Department and Uniform Fire Code Standards. Shop drawings will be submitted to and approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. The system will provide the following: (FD) 1) Water flow, valve tamper and trouble detection 2) Audible alarms 3) Smoke detectors g. Fire extinguishers will be installed and located in areas to comply with Huntington Beach Fire Code Standards. (FD) h. Fire lanes will be designated and posted to comply with City Specification No. 415. (FD) i. Address numbers will be installed to comply with City Specification No. 428. The size of the numbers will be sized a minimum of six (6) inches with a brush stroke of one and one-half (1-1/2) inches. (FD) j. Installation and/or removal of underground flammables or combustible liquid storage tanks shall comply with the Orange County Environmental Health and Huntington Beach Fire Department requirements. (FD) k. The subject property shall provide an irrevocable offer to dedicate reciprocal driveway and parking easement(s) between the subject site and adjacent service station property to the west. The legal instrument shall be submitted to the Planning Department a minimum of 60 days prior to building permit issuance. The document shall be approved by the Planning Department and the City Attorney as to form and content and, when approved, shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder. A copy of the recorded document shall be filed with the Planning Department. (Code Requirement) 1. An interim parking and/or building materials storage plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department to assure adequate parking and restroom facilities are available for employees, customers and contractors during the project's construction phase and that adjacent properties will not be impacted by their location. The applicant shall obtain any necessary encroachment permits from the Department of Public Works. m. Submit a letter of map revision from FEMA declaring the lot(s) exempt from floodplain requirements or submit a copy of completed FEMA Elevation Certificate(s)to the Planning Department. 5. During construction,the applicant shall: a. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems in all areas where vehicles travel to keep damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site: b. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day; c. Use low sulfur fuel (.05%) by weight for construction equipment; d. Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days (first stage smog alerts); e. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts. 6. Prior to occupancy and commencement of use, the following shall be completed: a. The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District and submit a copy to Planning Department. b. The parking lot shall be restriped and landscaping valued at a minimum of 10,000 dollars, shall be installed on the commercial shopping center parcel. c. The existing water service serving the site may potentially be utilized for irrigation purposes if it is of adequate size, conforms to current standards, and is in working condition as determined by the Water Division. The existing water meter must be replaced with a touch-read meter, and a new conforming back flow protection devices must be installed on the domestic and irrigation water systems. (PW) d. The proposed building shall have a separate fire service and backflow protection device. (PW) e. All improvements to the property shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans and conditions of approval specified herein, including: (PW) 1) The bus zone curb on Adams Avenue, along the frontage of the subject property, shall be re-painted red; 2) The existing driveway on Adams Avenue shall be removed and replaced with a radius driveway per Standard Plan No. 211; 3) The Traffic Impact Fee shall be paid prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy; 4) The site shall drain through a clarifier and filter system,then to the street; 5) A 6" VCP sewer lateral shall be required f. Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein shall be accomplished and verified by the Planning Department. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BIDDLE, SECONDED BY LAIRD TO CONTINUE ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 98-4 TO THE DUNE 22, 1999 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING,BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Laird,Kerins, Chapman,Biddle I� NOES: Livengood l ABSENT: Speaker,Mandic ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED B-2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 98-89 (JIFFY LUBE): APPLICANT: KHR Associates, Tamara Schippers LOCATION: 9032 Adams Avenue (south side of Adams Avenue, east of Magnolia Street PROJECT PLANNER: Amy Wolfe Conditional Use Permit No. 98-89 represents a request by Lester C. and Jimmy L. Smull Family Trust to establish a 4,631 sq. ft. two-story, drive-through vehicle equipment repair facility (Jiffy Lube) and re-stripe an existing shopping center to include compact parking. The proposed facility is intended to serve consumers within the immediate vicinity. The days and hours of operation are Monday through Friday from 8am to 6pm; Saturday lam to 5pm; and Sunday 9am to 5pm. The project site is zoned and designated in the General Plan for commercial uses. The property constitutes a separate parcel on the north side of the"Drug Emporium/Carl's Jr."commercial center and is subject to recorded CC&Rs and easements, inclusive of parking and access, for the subject retail center. The proposed building will replace an existing 2,482 sq. ft. single-story freestanding building formerly used as a real estate office. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff has evaluated the project with regard to general planning/land use compatibility issues and determined that the subject request will not implement General Plan land use and urban design goals. Staff recommends denial of Conditional Use Permit No. 98-89 for the following reasons: • The project is inconsistent with goals, objectives and policies of the General Plan which encourage distribution of land uses and patterns of development that preserve, enhance and establish a distinct identity for the City's neighborhoods,corridors and centers. • The project is inconsistent with goals objectives and policies of the General Plan which advocate land use distribution to increase shopping centers' viability as centers of community activity. The siting and use of the structure does not facilitate nor encourage pedestrian use. PC Minutes 3 (99PCM525) The proposed automobile-oil change/service drive-through facility would hinder future redevelopment of the existing retail center, including its intensification and re-use to improve its character and identity,by introducing an automotive service facility at a location(along Adams Avenue) which best lends itself to be developed with a pedestrian oriented use/activity. The building does not meet the General Plan intent of quality planning and design. • The proposed parking and circulation would negatively affect pedestrian use/activity on the commercial center. • The proposal is inconsistent with the intent of HBZSO design standards which encourage. minimizing visual intrusion of service bays on surrounding streets and properties and limit the maximum number of service bays to three (3)per site,none of which are permitted to face a public right-of-way. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Christian Fanticola, 978 Amelia, San Dimas,representing applicant, stated that they have redesigned the proposed project several times to incorporate staff s suggestions and feels the use will enhance the center and be compatible with the neighborhood. Charles Ball, 17631 Fitch Street,Irvine, representing center property owner, gave a brief history of the site and stated that the proposed use will be a viable use in the area. Robert Curry,485 N. Citrus Avenue,#60, Escondido,representing Oilmax, stated that their company is already providing a similar business use in the area and does not believe that the proposed business will be viable. James Kawamura,2355 Main Street,Irvine,representing applicant, stated that the proposed use is of high quality and conforms to the General Plan policies. He stated the proposed use will not hinder future redevelopment of the center and adequate screening is being provided along Adams Avenue. Hal Tucker, 19332 Sangous Lane,representing Oilmax, stated that there are currently ten(10) similar businesses in the area so there is no void in the market for the proposed use to fill. He also agrees with the staff report that the proposed use will not enhance the area. John Dilouro,2355 Main Street,architect representing applicant, stated the business will be run by experienced operators,will have adequate traffic circulation and adequate screening along Adams Avenue. Hamid-Kalhor, 8481 Grace Circle, owner Mobile Station,spoke in opposition to the request as. there are three (3) schools in the area and there are already too many similar uses in the area. Stanley E. Cameron, 9862 Adams,Manager Oilmax, stated the center is currently an eyesore and the proposed use will not encourage redevelopment of the center. Don Untch,20072 Shorewood, concerned with generation of additional traffic and accidents and a concentrated use of similar businesses in the area. Janice Powell, 9191 Adams Avenue, spoke in opposition to the proposed request because it is too close to a residential neighborhood with foot traffic and children playing. She also stated that she is opposed to the increased traffic and noise the proposed use will generate and a _. possible decline in property values for the area. PC Minutes 4 (99PCM525) THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. ( The Commission discussed concerns that the proposed use will increase the dilapidation of the center. It was suggested that the General Plan goals and policies be followed. Other I Commission members felt it complied with the General Plan and with additional conditions of approval would be a viable use for the site. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BIDDLE, SECONDED BY LAIRD,TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 98-89 WITH FINDINGS AND MODIFIED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL,BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Laird, Chapman,Biddle,Livengood NOES: Kerins ABSENT: Speaker,Mandic ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 98-89: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 98-89 for the establishment,maintenance and operation of a 4,361 sq. ft. vehicle equipment repair facility and re-striping of the commercial center to include 65 compact spaces will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. The project will improve the overall appearance of the intersection and complement the adjacent commercial center. The proposed Jiffy Lube would also act as the impetus for future redevelopment of the existing retail center and will provide an additional service to the residents and a revenue source to the City. 2. The conditional use permit will be compatible with surrounding uses due to the commercial character of the neighboring center and the existing service stations at the Adams and Magnolia Avenue intersection. The proposed service bay screen walls are properly. integrated within the building design. 3. The proposed vehicle repair facility will comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and any specific condition required for the proposed use in the district in which it would be located. The project complies with the development standards,parking and landscaping requirements of Chapter 211,231, and 232 respectively. 4. The granting of the conditional use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan. It is consistent with the Land Use Element designation of General Commercial on the subject property. In addition, it is consistent with the following goals and policies of the General Plan: PC Minutes 5 (99PCM525) Policy LU 10.1.4 Require that commercial buildings and sites be designed to achieve a high level of architectural and site layout quality. Policy LU 10.1.12 Require that Commercial General uses be designed and developed to achieve a high level of quality, distinctive character, and compatibility with existing uses and development including the consideration of a. incorporation of site landscape,particularly along street frontages and in parking lots; b. linkage of buildings by common architectural design, landscape and pedestrian systems, to avoid the appearance of independent freestanding structures surrounded by parking, The proposed structure incorporates variable massing and modulation, a gazebo structure and open space trellis screen,providing an interesting fagade along Adams Avenue. The building design incorporates quality architectural treatment on all sides. 5. The Planning Commission finds that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment and is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)pursuant to section 15303, Class 3 of the CEQA Guidelines,because the project is designed for an occupant load of 30 persons or less and will not be constructed in conjunction with the building of four or more such structures. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL-CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 98-89: 1. The site plan,floor plans and elevations received and dated March 25, 1999 shall be the conceptually approved layout for the subject parcel and shopping center parcel with the following modifications: a. Elevations shall depict the proposed colors in accordance with the colors and materials palette dated March 25, 1999. b. Parking lot striping detail shall comply with Chapter 231 of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and Title 24, California Administrative Code. (Code Requirement) c. Depict all utility apparatus, such as but not limited to back flow devices and Edison transformers on the site plan. Utility meters shall be screened from view from public rights-of-way. Electric transformers in a required front or street side yard shall be enclosed in subsurface vaults. Backflow prevention devices shall be prohibited in the front yard setback and shall be screened from view. (Code Requirement) d. All exterior mechanical equipment shall be screened from view on all sides. Rooftop mechanical equipment shall be setback 15 feet from the exterior edges of the building. Equipment to be screened includes,but is not limited to,heating, air conditioning, refrigeration equipment,plumbing lines, ductwork and transformers. Said screening shall be architecturally compatible with the building in terms of materials and colors. If screening is not designed specifically into the building, a rooftop mechanical equipment plan showing screening must be submitted for review and approval with the application for building permit(s). (Code Requirement) PC Minutes 6 (99PCM525) e. Depict all gas meters,water meters, electrical panels, air conditioning units, mailbox facilities and similar items on the site plan and elevations. If located on a building, they shall be architecturally designed into the building to appear as part of the building. They shall be architecturally compatible with the building and non-obtrusive, not interfere with sidewalk areas and comply with required setbacks. �.. f. If outdoor lighting is included, energy saving lamps shall be used. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties and shall be shown on the site plan and elevations. g. The parking lot restriping plan for the shopping center parcel (including Carl's Jr.) shall include landscaped areas in accord with Chapter 232 of the Zoning Subdivision Ordinance. Section 232.12, Exceptions of the Zoning Subdivision Ordinance would apply. 2. Prior to issuance of grading permits the following shall be completed: a. The developer shall submit a Landscape Construction Set,prepared by a licensed Landscape Architect,to the Park, Tree and Landscape Division for their approval showing all proposed plantings for the subject parcel and adjacent shopping center. The Landscape Construction Set must be approved by the Departments of Public Works and Planning. The Landscape Construction Set shall include a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State Licensed Landscape Architect which identifies the location,type, size and quantity of all existing plant materials on the subject parcel and adjacent shopping center to remain, existing plant materials to be removed and proposed plant materials; an irrigation plan; a grading plan; an approved site plan and a copy of the entitlement conditions of approval. The landscape plans shall be in conformance with Chapter 232 of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and applicable Design Guidelines. Any existing mature trees that must be removed shall be replaced at a two to one ratio (2:1)with minimum 36 inch box trees and shall be incorporated into the project's landscape plan. The rest of the shopping center shall be brought up to the HBZSO landscaping requirements including a minimum 10' wide landscaped planter along Adams Avenue,minimum 6' wide landscaped planter along Magnolia Street, 6% of the site landscaped, one 24"box tree well for every 10 parking spaces. One 36"box tree per 45 feet of linear frontage, and irrigation systems providing 100%coverage. (PW) (Code Requirement) b. A grading plan, prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to the PC Minutes 7 (99PCM525) 3. Prior to submittal for building permits,the following shall be completed: a. Zoning entitlement conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on the cover page of all the working drawing sets used for issuance of building permits(architectural, structural, electrical, mechanical and plumbing). b. All Fire Department requirements per these conditions shall be noted on the building plans. (FD). c. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer and submitted with the building permit application. This analysis shall include on-site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding: grading, foundations,retaining walls, streets,utilities, and chemical and fill properties of underground items including buried pipe and concrete and the protection thereof. (Code Requirement) d. An engineering geologist shall be engaged to submit a report indicating the ground surface acceleration from earth movement for the subject property. All structures within this development shall be constructed in compliance with the g-factors as indicated by the geologist's report. Calculations for footings and structural members to withstand anticipated g-factors shall be submitted to the City for review prior to the issuance of building permits. (Code Requirement) - 4. Prior to issuance of building permits,the following shall be completed: a. Submit copy of the revised site plan,floor plans and elevations pursuant to Condition No. 1 for review and approval and inclusion in the entitlement file to the Planning Department. b. A grading permit shall be issued. (PW) c. All Public Works fees shall be paid. (PW- Code Requirements) d. Floors shall be designed to drain to an approved oil separator or trap discharging to sewers in accordance with the Plumbing Code per UBC 311.2.3.1. (BD) e. Automatic sprinkler systems shall be installed in the basement area per Uniform Building Code Section 904.2.2 and the Huntington Beach Fire Code Section 1003.2.2. Shop drawings shall be submitted and approved by the Fire Department prior to system installation. (FD) f. A fire alarm system will be installed to comply with Huntington Beach Fire Department and Uniform Fire Code Standards. Shop drawings will be submitted to and approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. The system will provide the following: (FD) 1) Water flow,valve tamper and trouble detection 2) Audible alarms 3) Smoke detectors �7 g. Fire extinguishers will be installed and located in areas to comply with Huntington Beach Fire Code Standards. (FD) PC Minutes 8 (99PCM525) h. Fire lanes will be designated and posted to comply with City Specification No. 415. (FD) i. Address numbers will be installed to comply with City Specification No. 428. The size of the numbers will be sized a minimum of six (6)inches with a brush stroke of one and one-half(1-1/2) inches. (FD) I j. Installation and/or removal of underground flammables or combustible liquid storage tanks shall comply with the Orange County Environmental Health and Huntington Beach Fire Department requirements. (FD) k. The subject property shall provide an irrevocable offer to dedicate reciprocal driveway and parking easement(s)between the subject site and adjacent service station property to the west. The legal instrument shall be submitted to the Planning Department a minimum of 60 days prior to building permit issuance. The document shall be approved by the Planning Department and the City Attorney as to form and content and,when approved, shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder. A copy of the recorded document shall be filed with the Planning Department. (Code Requirement) 1. An interim parking and/or building materials storage plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department to assure adequate parking and restroom facilities are available for employees, customers and contractors during the project's construction phase and that adjacent properties will not be impacted by their location. The applicant shall obtain any necessary encroachment permits from the Department of Public Works. m. Submit a letter of map revision from FEMA declaring the lot(s) exempt from.floodplain requirements or submit a copy of completed FEMA Elevation Certificate(s)to the Planning Department. 5. During construction,the applicant shall: a. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems in all areas where vehicles travel to keep damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site: b. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day; c. Use low sulfur fuel(.05%)by weight for construction equipment; d. Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days (first stage smog alerts); e. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts. 6. Prior to occupancy and commencement of use,the following shall be completed: a. The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District and submit a copy to Planning Department. b. The parking lot shall be restriped and landscaping installed on the commercial shopping center parcel so that it conforms to provisions of Chapter 231 and 232 of the Huntington Beach Zoning & Subdivision Ordinance per Conditions l.g. and 2.a..j herein. PC Minutes 9 (99PCM525) c. The existing water service serving the site may potentially be utilized for irrigation purposes if it is of adequate size, conforms to current standards, and is in working condition as determined by the Water Division. The existing water meter must be replaced with a touch-read meter, and a new conforming back flow protection devices must be installed on the domestic and irrigation water systems. (PV ) d. The proposed building shall have a separate fire service and backflow protection device. ('W) e. All improvements to the property shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans and conditions of approval specified herein,including: (PW) 1) The bus zone curb on Adams Avenue, along the frontage of the subject property,shall be re-painted red; 2) The existing driveway on Adams Avenue shall be removed and replaced with a radius driveway per Standard Plan No. 211; 3) The Traffic Impact Fee shall be paid prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy; 4) The site shall drain through a clarifier and filter system,then to the street; 5) A 6"VCP sewer lateral shall be required f. Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein shall be accomplished and verified by the Planning Department. g. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber,wire,pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. h. If the lot is not considered exempt by FEMA, a second elevation certificate shall be submitted to the Planning Department for the project"as built." 7. The use shall comply with the following: a. There shall be no outside storage of vehicles,vehicle parts, equipment or trailers. c. All repair work shall be conducted wholly within the building;no servicing of vehicles outside of the building. d. Hours of operation shall be limited to between 7:00am—8:00pm(Monday through Sunday). e. Only the uses described in the narrative attached to the May 25, 1999 Planning . Commission Staff Report shall be permitted. f. No vehicles shall encroach into the 24 ft. wide reciprocal access to the adjacent service station. 8. The Planning Director ensures that all conditions of approval herein are complied with. The Planning Director shall be notified in writing if any changes to the site plan,elevations and floor plans are proposed as a result of the plan check process. Building permits shall not be issued until the Planning Director has reviewed and approved the proposed changes for conformance with the intent of the Planning Commission's action and the conditions herein. If the proposed changes are of a substantial nature, an amendment to the original entitlement reviewed by the Planning Commission may be required pursuant to the HBZSO. PC Minutes 10 (99PCM525) INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 98-89 shall not become effective until the ten-day appeal period has elapsed. 2. Conditional Use Permit No. 98-89 shall become null and void unless exercised within one year of the date of final approval or such extension of time as may be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. 3. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Conditional Use Permit No. 98-89, pursuant to a public hearing for revocation, if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance or Municipal Code occurs. 4. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid. (PW) 5. Traffic Impact Fees shall be paid at the time of final inspection or issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. (PW) 6. An encroachment permit shall be required for all work within the right-of-way. (PW) 7. A Certificate of Occupancy must be issued by the Planning Department prior to occupying the building. 8. State-mandated school impact fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. 9. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, Building Department, and Fire Department as well as applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards, except as noted herein. 10. Construction shall be limited to Monday- Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. 11. All signs shall conform to applicable Planned Sign Program for the retail center. Prior to installing any new signs, or changing sign faces, a building permit shall be obtained from the Planning Department. 12. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of$38.00 for the posting of the Notice of Exemption at the County of Orange Clerk's Office. The check shall be made out to the County of Orange and submitted to the Planning Department within two (2) days of the Planning Commission's action. f PC Minutes 11 (99PCM525) C. . CONSENT CALENDAR C-1 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DATED MAY 11, 1999 A MOTION WAS MADE BY KERINS, SECONDED BY.LIVENGOOD,TO APPROVE...' '— PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DATED 1VIAY 11;4099 BY`THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Laird,Kerins,Livengood j NOES: None ABSENT: Speaker,Mandic t_ ABSTAIN: Chapman,Biddle MOTION PASSED D. NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS None E PLANNINGCOMMISSION ITEMS E-1 PLANNING COMMISSION COMMITTEE'REPORTS None E-2: PLANNING COMMISSION INQUIRIES/COMMENTS Commissioner Laird—asked staff if there has been consideration given towards expanding the 300 foot radius legal notification requirement due to Speaker's complaints . :.about-not-being,notified. Staff explained that the Planning Commission and staff have:. _ discussed tfie legal notification radius.:issue several times in the-past andl'staff would present the current notif cation requirements to Commissioner Laud for:review. Commissioner..Biddle—requested that staff research,and review ways to be proactive in`. the renovation of aging,dilapidated.shopping centers throughout the city. Commissioner Kerins—concurs with Commissioner Biddle's request;however,he stated. ' that`thehomeowner's:association foFahe residential tract at Brookhurst and Adams.has _ �. .. ... been trying to work:with the commercial center:on the same comer. or years without success- He stated.that stronger actionmust be taken.. Coirimissioner-Kerins stated thtit centers which get big-income uses to come into the center without having any expenditure are the major.cause_of concern should be looked into. Commissioner Kerins- also requested-that staff review-the city's outmoded requirement for compact parking :_He. feels the standards should be brought up to date to reflect today's market of vehicles. Commission Kerins also commended staff on the Department's Annual Report. Commissioner Chapman—stated that the Commission should form a Committee to study the aging commercial shopping centers within the city and as acting Chairperson appointed Commissioners Kerins and Laird with the third Commissioner to be appointed by Chairperson Speaker upon his return. PC Minutes 12 (99PCM525) F. PLANNING ITEMS F-1 CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS FROM PREVIOUS MEETING ( Howard Zelefsky, Planning Director—re-stated Planning Department public hearing items from the previous City Council meeting. F-2 PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING Scott Hess, Principal Planner—reviewed items for the June 8, 1999 Planning Commission meeting. G. ADJOURNMENT—Adjourn to the June 8, 1999 meeting. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECONDED BY LAIRD, TO ADJOURN TO A 5:30 PM STUDY SESSION ON JUNE 8, 1999,AND THEN TO REGULARLY SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AT 7:00 PM,BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Laird, Kerins, Chapman,Biddle, Livengood NOES: None ABSENT: Speaker, Mandic ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED /kjl APPROVED BY: How d Zelefs ecretary Plannin C is on Chairperson f PC Minutes 13 (99PCM525) REQUEST FOR LATE SUBMITTAL (To accompany RCA's submitted after Deadline C.vP Department: q8- L.Ro0>zt N Subject 1 -S Council Meeting Date Date of This Request T REASON (Why is this RCA being submitted late?): EXPLANATION (Why is this RCA necessary to this agenda?): g Z Q GL_ rNIMPAI J,^ CONSEQUENCES (How shall delay of this RCA adversely impact the City?): c rA a� 10' A-c 0 s' ture: -Approved C] Denied ....... Department Head Ray Silver City Administrator RCA ROUTING SHEET INITIATING DEPARTMENT: Planning Department SUBJECT: Jiffy Lube/Adams & Magnolia - CUP No. 98-89 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 2, 1999 RCA ATTACHMENTS STATUS Ordinance (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Not Applicable Resolution (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Not Applicable Tract Map, Location Map and/or other Exhibits Attached Contract/Agreement (w/exhibits if applicable) (Signed in full by the City Attomey) Not Applicable Subleases, Third Party Agreements, etc. (Approved as to form by City Attorney) Not Applicable Certificates of Insurance (Approved by the City Attorney) Not Applicable Financial Impact Statement (Unbudget, over $5,000) Not Applicable Bonds (If applicable) Not Applicable Staff Report (If applicable) Attached Commission, Board or Committee Report (If applicable) Not Attached (Explain) Findings/Conditions for Approval and/or Denial Attached EXPLANATION FOR MISSING ATTACHMENTS. Planning Commission report issues have been addressed by subject RCA REVIEWED RETURNED FORWARDED: _ - Administrative Staff ( ) ( ) Assistant City Administrator (Initial) ( ) ( ) City Administrator (Initial) City Clerk ( ) ... . EXPLANTIONFORTURNOFITEM.A Only)(Below Space For City Clerk's Use RCA Author: HZ:SH:AW:kl 1 _ CASH RECEIPT CITY OF hlJNTiNC4T0N MAO 2000 MAIN STREET . • HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92648 HUNTINCTON BEACH - - - DATE d2G ISSUING DEPT. -1 Y"f_r —k- Ei DEPT.TELE.# RECEIVED FROM ADDRESS �t`.C� FOR .� 20, ff MQ'r yS 4�� Wc tt � a F CREDIT !C PREPARED 8Y i { f <%n RECEIVED BY f Z ) % �... - j EXPENSE FINANCE APPROVAL i - r INITIAL; - f ^ x TOTAL 2f5S{224r 2 $1494.00� Cash cs n ►-� s Sri Jun ��. 1.94 tlie2h'P?fi ' 4 - r � f K - - x Y � � r. F tom- 934.268 ` 3 ' Y at x y 4`ISSUING DEPARTMENT := , NOTICE OF APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION s OF CJ' May 25, 1999 f: Date of Planning Commission Action TO: Planning Dept (2 copies) DATE: June 4, 1999 City Attorney (1 copy) j FILED BY Mobil 9001 At3am- A eAch , vim, 13i�ntin�nn B , CA 92646 i P Oil Max, 9862 AdamG AvP,HLtntingt-C) l Beacb, CA 92646 h REGARDING: C.U.P. Jiffy Lube, 9032 Adams Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Tentative Date for Public Hearing: To he determined Copy of Appeal Letter attached. r� LEGAL NOTICE AND A.P. MAILING LIST MUST BE RECEIVED IN THE CITY CL_ERRS;(-,r OFFICE 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE Connie Brockway City Clerk x5227 ..•�..���r nt, a T\T\T1 ♦ T TA T1T • 1►T\T1rATJ" / d'%'tAM A1rTVL--Fd-%NT A !-TTlN\T l NOTICE OF APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ®a-� OF Woo May 25, 1999 Date of Planning Commission Action TO: Planning Dept (2 copies) DATE: June 3,: 1999 City Attorney (1 copy) FILED BY L. C. SmulI dba Business Properties Development Company 16731 Fitch Irvine CA 92623-9586 � c REGARDING: C.U.P. 98-89 Jiffy Lube, 9032 Adams Avenue to fs Tentative Date for Public Hearing: To be determined Copy of Appeal Letter attached. LEGAL NOTICE AND A.P.NUMING LIST MUST BE RECEIVED IN THE CITY CLERK'S:.- OFFICE 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE > Connie Brockway City Clerk x5227 CASH RECEIPT • CITY OF hUNTINr4TON beACh 2000 MAIN STREET • HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH DAT 44L ISSUING DE-PT l DEPT.TELE.# RECEIVED FROM / A ADDRESS �// 1�7111i�o LFr Jy FOR l O AMOUNT;RECENED � � 5 �C{1SH HECK ❑'CARDIT .� y �� % /�, • G,�' PREPARED BY dd- RECEIVED BY FINANCE APPROVAL INITIAL TOTAL$ _T'%� 3i5 i1 ! 3 $1491).ik0 =srRu-es.pts Thu Jura 43 v 1"? 12:08 Phi £i 8339-5 0 -9342.64 ISS UING DEPARTMENT :.. "M Pik DML MEETING DATE: August 2, 1999 DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: REQUESTING: Planning Conditional Use Permit No. 98-89 (Appeal) TODAY'S DATE July 14, 1999 VERIFIED BY ADMININSTRATION: APPROVED BY: Q �. Ray Silver City Administrator 7/14/99 11:22 AM. 71d a� 9 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday,August 2, 1999, at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach,the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following item: ❑ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 98-89 (APPEAL) Applicant: KHR Associates , Tamara Schippers Appellants: Mobil Oil Company, Oil Max, and L.C. Smull, d.b.a. Business Properties Development Company Request: Appeal to Planning Commission's approval of a proposal to demolish approximately 2,500 square foot building (formerly used as a real estate office) and construct/establish an approximately 4,631 square foot, two (2) story automobile repair("limited") facility and re-stripe the"Drug Emporium" parking lot to include compact parking. Location: 9032 Adams Avenue (south side of Adams Avenue, east of Magnolia Street) Planner Assigned: Amy Wolfe NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the above item is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library (7111 Talbert Avenue) after July 29, 1999. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any fi.Irther questions please call the Planning Department at 536-5271 and refer to the above item. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 536-5227 (G:\LEGALS\COUNCIL\99\99cc802a.doc) A� CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT: T LA ti o t Ok MEETING DATE: CONTACT: } A\4 t jJ 0 Lf 6 PHONE: x ��1 S N/A YES NO ( ) ) ( ) Is the notice attached? Do the Heading and Closing of Notice reflect City Council(and/or ( Redevelopment Agency)hearing? ( ) ( ) Are the date, day and time of the public hearing correct? ( ) ( ) If an appeal, is the appecant's name included in the notice? ( ) ( ) If Coastal Development Permit,does the notice include appeal language? Is there an Environmental Status to be approved by Council? Is a map attached for publication? ( ) ( ) Is a larger ad required? Size ( ) ( ) ( ) Is the verification statement attached indicating the source and accuracy of the mailing list? . Are the applicant's name and address part of the mailing labels? ( ) ( ) Are the appellant's name and address part of the mailing labels? If Coastal Development Permit,is the.Coastal Commission part of the mailing labels? ( ) ( ) If Coastal Development Permit,are the resident labels attached? ( ) ( ) Is the Report 33433 attached? (Economic Development Dept. items only) Please complete the following: 1. Minimum days from publication to hearing date 2. . Number of times to be published 3. Number of days between publications 21 CUP 98-89/JIFFY LUBE MAILING LABELS July 12, 1999 The attached labels have been generated by the Planning Department and checked by Ian Jones and Victor Van Zandt y W/fe, Associate er I 181-182-20 151-531-02 151-531-14 Wilson, Robert W T NEWLAND Estate W T Newland Estate 20042 Shorewood Cir. 20142 Swansea Lane 18791 E Pearl Ave. Huntington Beach,CA. 92646 Huntington Beach,CA.92646 Orange,CA. , DOhR-L D T- Toh n s o") Cos{u YYlesa, � . 92 i 32,F5 l./W 151-182-01 151-182-02 2- 151-182-03 3 CARL E.&PATRICIA A.PETTIT PATRICIA L.EARLEY BREES BARBARA KELLOGG 15712 SWAN LN 12802 LOUISE ST 300 E COAST HWY#328 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649-1433 GARDEN GROVE CA 92841-4514 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660-6119 151-182-04 L1 151-182-05 S 151-182-06 6 MASON H.&DENISE A.DELARM STEVE S.&CARLINA THOMAS MARK LEE DENNIS 20051 SHOREWOOD CIR 9862 DRAGON CIR 20081 SHOREWOOD CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4612 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-6533 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4612 151-182-07 '7 151-182-08 Y 151-182-09 9 THOMAS M.&GLYNIS L.HERBEL RICHARD K.SNIFFER MARK CONAVAY 20091 SHOREWOOD CIR 20101 SHOREWOOD CIR 20111 SHOREWOOD CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4612 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4601 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4601 151-182-10 /O 151-182-11 I1 151-182-12 1 z DAVID S.MARKS ERIN D.FOX JOSEPH L.FARNEY 20121 SHOREWOOD CIR 20131 SHOREWOOD CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4601 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4601 151-182-13 13 151-182-14 ICI 151-182-15 15 EUGENE GIVONE DONAL OH ROBERT &BARBARA DRURY 20112 SHOREWOOD CIR 2579 WE S 20092 SHOREWOOD CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4601 CpSrA MESA CA 92627-13-4*Bs HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4600 151-182-16 ff. 151-182-17 1-7 151-182-18 I k GENA BENVENUTI LAURA EVANS UNTCH PAUL E.HART 20082 SHOREWOOD CIR 20072 SHOREWOOD CIR 20052 SHOREWOOD CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4600 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4600 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4600 151-182-19 '9 >ABB 20 151-182-21 Z-1 ROBERT MICHAEL&PEGGY ANN WILSON RONALD G.BURNETT 20042 SHOREWOOD CIR 20022 SHOREWOOD CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4600 92627-3162 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646 151-182-22 22 151-182-23 �3 AKIN SEZENOL GEORGE A.&LETICIA M.AUGUST 20021 HARBOR ISLE LN 20031 HARBOR ISLE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4608 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4608 151-182-25 2 s 151-182-26 2-G 151-182-27 L 1 JOHN G.COX LAWRENCE W.BOTTORFF OPAL A.COUGHLIN 20051 HARBOR ISLE LN 20071 HARBOR ISLE LN 20081 HARBOR ISLE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4608 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4608 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4608. 151-182-28 2$ 151-182-29 7-`Z 151-182-30 3d DEBRA LEE HINMON GEORGE A.SQUIER RAYMOND H.WATSON 20091 HARBOR ISLE LN 20101 HARBOR ISLE LN 20111 HARBOR ISLE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4608 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4610 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4610 ISI- �82-3\ 31 ISl - 132 Sl -1g2-I-L- IZ w%nIc,�-V\ o. 2c\2� Hoxt]cr ZS\.z Lv 20122 Shc rzwoodL Gr Zo�2Z 5\1c r�woccR L i r Nv ,vim � cl. C14 '0/2b`I(:, F1v�n�tv��tcr�\3Qc�c]ti CA ofZG.4lo Nv�1k.������3ac�chCi� °IZbF6 151-182-32 32- 151-182-33 33 151-182-34 --- 4 TIN N.HOANG FIRDAUS E.UDWADIA TONY M.GUENTHER 20131 HARBOR ISLE LN 2100 S SANTA ANITA AVE 328 PIAZZA LIDO HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4610 ARCADIA CA 91006-4611 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92663-4646 151-182-35 3 T 151-182-36 346 151-182-37 3-T DENNIS M.MEAD JOHN P.&ESTRELLA HACKER GEORGE A.&LORRAE E.MURILLO 9161 MEDITERRANEAN DR 1943 WHITTIER AVE 20731 ELIZABETH LN HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4638 COSTA MESA CA 92627-4159 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-5846 151-191-01 3$ 151-191-02 151-191-03 ko BRET STEVEN BAKER DANNY B.&DEANNA M.HUSBAND ROBERT J.WEAVER 9121 MEDITERRANEAN DR 9111 MEDITERRANEAN DR 9101 MEDITERRANEAN DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4638 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4638 : HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4638 151-191-04 AA\ 151-191-05 4l2- 151-191-06 4 3 JOHN N.&MARY LESLIE DAVIDSON JAMES W.SULLY RUTH M.DENNO 9091 MEDITERRANEAN DR 9081 MEDITERRANEAN DR 9071 MEDITERRANEAN DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4636 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4636 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 926464636 151-191-07 -4 Lk 151-191-08 4S . 151-191-09 46 LOUIS A-&LISA L ALVAREZ YATES TRUST TYRONE E.&DENISSE F.WALTERS 900 W SIERRA MADRE AV#88 9051 MEDITERRANEAN DR 9031 MEDITERRANEAN DR AZUSA CA 91702-1888 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4636 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4636 151-191-10 4 7 151-191-11 4 8 151-191-12. 49 CHARLES BARBA ALBERT N.&MARYANNE DUREAU CHURCH CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN OF 9021 MEDITERRANEAN DR 438 MAIN ST#C 20112 MAGNOLIA ST HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4636 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-5132 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4632 151-191-17 SO 151-191-18 6-1 151-191-20 SZ TOSCO CORP CHAR BROILED HAMBURG ERS HEINZ LESTER C.SMULL PO BOX 52085 525 N PINE WAY PO BOX 19586 PHOENIX AZ 85072-2085 ANAHEIM CA 92805-2505 IRVINE CA 92623-9586 151-191-24 53 151-191-25 SLi 151-531-01 64 LESTER C.SMULL LESTER C.SMULL GINA E.RYAN PO BOX 19586 PO BOX 19586 20152 SWANSEA LN IRVINE CA 92623-9586 IRVINE CA 92623-9586 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4649 1-531-02 6 151-531-03 70 151-531-04 '71 W T N S W T NEWLAND ESTATE PAUL M.HOY 314 TELLA AVE 20132 SWANSEA LN 20122 SWANSEA LN 0 NGE CA 92867-4753 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4649 I 151-531-05 72- 151-531-06 -73 151-531-07 74 W T NEWLAND ESTATE W T NEWLAND ESTATE W T NEWLAND ESTATE 20112 SWANSEA LN 730 HELMHILL AV 4711 E ARBOR RD HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4649 LAS VEGAS NV 89123-0524 LONG BEACH CA 90808-1004 151-531-08 -7 151-531-09 -7 6 151-531-10 -7-7 W T NEWLAND ESTATES W T NEWLAND ESTATE W T NEWLAND ESTATE 20082 SWANSEA LN 20072 SWANSEA LN 20062 SWANSEA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4649 HUNTINGTON BEACH.CA 92646-4649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4649 151-531-11 "1 g 151-531-12 -7`l 151-531-13 $b W T NEWLAND ESTATE W T NEWLAND ESTATE W T NEWLAND ESTATE 9302 GARFIELD AV PO BOX 6598 20071 SWANSEA LN SOUTH GATE CA 90280-3805 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92615-6598 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4607 31-14 151-531-15 sZ- 151-531-20 83 W T N STAT W T NEWLAND ESTATE WILLIAM MOORMAN 26 ENTER ST 8931 BELLSHIRE DR 20062 GOTHIC CIR ANTA ANA CA 92704-5537 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4616 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4628 151-531-21 19(4 151-531-22 �5 5 151-531-23 16 W T NEWLAND ESTATE GORDON P.DAILEY W T NEWLAND ESTATE 20052 GOTHIC CIR 20032 GOTHIC CIR 20012 GOTHIC CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4628 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4628 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4628 151-533-22 151-533-23 -6'7 153-243-11 8 CK CARMEN R.TR KA KAISER FARGHALLI MOHAMED E D THOMPSON FAMILY PROPER TIES 20121 SWANSEA LN 20131 SWANSEA LN 813 EDGEBROOK DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4648 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-4648 MODESTO CA 95354-1419 153-282-25 SS 153-282-26 S6 ROBERT SLEDGE ROBERT R.MUNOZ 9122 CRAWFORD CIR 9132 CRAWFORD CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-3409 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-3409 153-282-27 6-7 153-282-28 S1S 153-282-29 55 COLLEEN L.FAITH THOMAS B.KUEHN JHUN KYU&BONG HEE PARK 9142 CRAWFORD CIR 9152 CRAWFORD CIR 9162 CRAWFORD CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-3409 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-3409 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-3409 153-282-30 6 d 153-282-31 61 153-282-32 6 Z DAVID M.MONTGOMERY MIROSLAV POKORNI JANICE L.POWELL 9182 CRAWFORD CIR 9192 CRAWFORD CIR 9191 ADAMS AV HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-3409 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-3409 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-3403 153-282-34 6 y 153-282-35 b5 153-282-36 6 6 ALBERT N.&MARYANNE DUREAU PATRICK M.&ALBERTA M.CAMILO MICHAEL M.KHATIBI 438 MAIN ST#C 9151 ADAMS AVE 10 ST LAURENT HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-5132 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-3403 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92657-1106 153-282-38 is 3-xs2-33 4 3 U� �O�pe� l �or�aa o� ►�• Cas;�- MOBIL OIL CORPORATION nook �\ dL�w1� �,v e, q 1 tk F}Acu u s Ave PO BOX 290 }�v.� p�p l �72�c� C/� Ron"t,, F se X&L C-'e q ZIA10 DALLAS TX 75221-0290 v�. l-Fci\ Tuc�G� Hod 7uckea- 9 $4cZ PAm-w.5 Ave. IG 332 SctiwcJrc�ss Nv,1-�rnc� .Bec ck Cf�- U4 9 Z[�44 PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST "B" MAILING LABELS - January 13, 1999 President 1 H.B. Chamber of Commerce 2210`fain Street,Suite 200 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Judy Legan 2 William D.Holman 11 Orange County Assoc. of Realtors PLC 25552 La Paz Road 23 Corporate Plaza,Suite 250 Laguna Hills, CA 92653 Newport Beach CA 92660-7912 Mr.Tom Zanic 12 Edna Littlebury 17 New Urban West Gldn St.Mob.Hm.Owners Leag. 520 Broadway Ste. 100 11021 Magnolia Blvd. Santa Monica,CA 90401 Garden Grove,CA 92642 Pres.,H.B.Hist Society 13 C/O Newland House Museum 19820 Beach Blvd. Huntington Beach,CA 92648 President 5 Chairperson 14 Huntington Beach Tomorrow Historical Resources Bd. PO Box 865 Comm.Services Dept 'Huntington Beach,CA 92648 2000 Main St Huntington Beach,CA 92648 John Scandura 9 Environmental Board Chairman 17492 Valeworth Circle Huntington Beach,CA 92649 h1angel:phlbl 153-284-01 153-284-02 153-284-03 HUNTINGTON BEACH SHOPPING CENTER ANTOINETTE TURNER ANTOINETTE TURNER 15000 VENTURA BLVD#305 1021 S FREMONT AVE 1021 S FREMONT AVE SHERMAN OAKS CA 91403-5440 ALHAMBRA CA 91803-1324 ALHAMBRA CA 91803-1324 153-284-04 153-284-05 153-284-06 ANTOINETTE TURNER JEFFREY M.SCHULEIN JOHN M.&BRENDA R.ZUBIETA 1025 S FREMONT AVE 9045 ADAMS AVE 9051 SANTIAGO DR ALHAMBRA CA 91803-1324 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-3401 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-6324 153-284-07 153-284-08 153-284-09 HUNTINGTON BEACH SHOPPING CENTER HUNTINGTON BEACH SHOPPING CENTER ALFRED C.TR#1 DUCKETT 15000 VENTURA BLVD#305 15000 VENTURA BLVD#305 ; 11150 SANTA MONICA BL#760- SHERMAN OAKS CA 91403-5440 SHERMAN OAKS CA 91403-5440 LOS ANGELES CA 90025-3386 153-284-10 HUNTINGTON BEACH SHOPPING 15000 VENTURA BLVD#305 A. P"Q- SHERMAN OAKS CA 91403-5440 clot 1:1 1��3 c- z a,n,. . K c- Sn.�-��l 4�cc`1 ` k,,a M e 763i Q'.'n-c- �► `1�6`�3"`I S�fo �no��e:� �^ Gft i28o3 S ko.��•¢...t E Cch„r�v�o� -h.AV\ N `i2 b"L4 I! NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday, August 2, 1999, at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following item: ❑ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 98-89 (APPEAL) Applicant: KHR Associates , Tamara Schippers Appellants: Mobil Oil Company, Oil Max, and L.C. Smull, d.b.a. Business Properties Development Company Request: Appeal to Planning Commission's approval of a proposal to demolish approximately 2,500 square foot building (formerly used as a real estate office) and construct/establish an approximately 4,631 square foot, two (2) story automobile repair("limited") facility and re-stripe the "Drug Emporium" parking lot to include compact parking. Location: 9032 Adams Avenue (south side of Adams Avenue, east of Magnolia Street) Planner Assigned: Amy Wolfe NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the above item is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library (7111 Talbert Avenue) after July 29, 1999. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to,the public hearing. If there are any fi.lrther questions please call the Planning Department at 536-5271 and refer to the above item. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 536-5227 (G:\LEGALS\COUNCIL\99\99cc 802 a.doc) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday, August 2, 1999, at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following item: 0 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 98-89 (APPEAL) Applicant: KHR Associates.,- Tamara Schippers Appellants: Mobil Oil Company, Oil Max, and L.C. Smull, d.b.a. Business Properties Development Company Request: Appeal to Planning Commission's approval of a proposal to demolish approximately 2,500 square foot building (formerly used as a real estate office) and construct/establish an approximately 4,631 square foot, two (2) story automobile repair("limited") facility and re-stripe the "Drug Emporium" parking lot to include compact parking. Location: 9032 Adams Avenue (south side of Adams Avenue, east of Magnolia Street) Planner Assigned: Amy Wolfe NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the above item is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library (7111 Talbert Avenue) after July 29, 1999. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's. action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any fiirther questions please call the Planning Department at 536-5271 and refer to the above item. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 536-5227 (G:\LEGALS\COUNCIL\99\99cc802a.doc) J� City of Huntington Beach P.O.Box 190-2000 Main Street Huntington Beach,California 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH From the desk of- Connie Brockway, CMC City Clerk Telephone: (714) 536-5404 Fax: (714) 374-1557 4 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday,August 2, 1999, at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following item: ❑ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 98-89 (APPEAL) Applicant: KHR Associates , Tamara Schippers Appellants: Mobil Oil Company, Oil Max, and L.C. Smull, d.b.a. Business Properties Development Company Request: Appeal to Planning Commission's approval of a proposal to demolish approximately 2,500 square foot building (formerly used as a real estate office) and construct/establish an approximately 4,631 square foot, two (2) story automobile repair("limited") facility and re-stripe the "Drug Emporium" parking lot to include compact parking. Location: 9032 Adams Avenue (south side of Adams Avenue, east of Magnolia Street) Planner Assigned: Amy Wolfe NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the above item is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library (7111 Talbert Avenue) after July 29, 1999. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any fiirther questions please call the Planning Department at 536-5271 and refer to the above item. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 536-5227 (G:\L EGALS\COUNCIL\99\99cc 802 a.do c) I PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. County of Orange ) am a Citizen of the United States and a - man' Company aquas:= NOTICE OF Appeal to Planning (ft: . resident of the County aforesaid; I am PUBLIC HEARING mission's approval of'-a BEFORE THE CITY. proposal to demolish ap- over the age of eighteen years, and not a COUNCICOF THE proximately,.2,500 square CITY OF oot building(formerly used party to or interested in the below HUNTINGTONBEACH- as a real�estateoflice)-and, NOTICE. IS HEREBY construcUestablish an_ap- GIVEN that on. Monday; proximatelyy:4,631 "square entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of A�gustz,,999;at7:00Al foot,two(2)story automo in the Cif Council bile-repair("limited').facil`- the HUNTINGTON BEACH INDEPENDENT, a Chambers, 2000: Main- 'ty-,and re-stnpe the=;Drug Street, Huntington Beach,. Emporium`';parking lotto newspaper of general circulation printed the CityCouncil will hold a. .Include compact parking;: P public earing-on the (ol-. Location.9032 Adams;Av- and published in the City of Huntington lowing Item, enue(southsideofAdams CONDITIONAL USE Avenue, east of Magnolia: Beach County of Orange State of PERMIT NO.= 98-89 (AP-, Street) Planner Assigned,-, PEAL)Applicant:KHR As- Amy Wolfe sociates, Tamara Sc hip- NOTICE IS HEREBY" California, and that attached Notice Is a pers Appellants: Mobil Oil GIVENthattheabove-ite' true and complete:,-copy as was printed Company Oil'Max,and is categorically exempt; L.C. Smull, d.b.a., Busi- from the prEnviron mental ' - � Hess Properties Develop- California: Environmental and- published =•in -the- Hun-tington Beach — Quality FILE. i and Fountain Valle issues of said ON FILE: A copy.otthe Proposed'request is on file,m the Community Develop- newspaper to wit the issue(s) of: Main StreetDepa ant, 2 Main-:Street,. Huntington• Beach;.'.California 92648, for inspection by the public., A copy of the staff':reppq, will be-available:-.to_.m: terested'parties at City-Halle, or the Main City Library' (71:11 Talbert Avenue).a;a July 22 , 1999 teALL INTERESTED PER-', SONS are invited to attend said hearhg and express opinions or submit. evi- dence for or against the ap- I declare, under penalty of perjury, that plicationhallenge theabove. l It you challenge the City II council's action in court, the foregoing is true and correct. you may be limited to rais g b -ing-only_those_Issues-you- or someone else raised at the- public.--?,h"earing,,rde- scribed=lhithis notice;or-in written"-correspo idence- Executed on July 22 , 1999 delivered to:the-City at 'or prior to the public hearing. at Costa Mesa, California. If there are any 'further qquestions please call'the PIanriing Department: at 536-5271 and refer to the" above`Item. Direct_:your written communications!to the City Clerk._ Connie,Brockway Cittyy Clerk Cloy.of - -Huntinggton Beach:::r ,,.2000-Ma_ln Street .. ~ Huntington,Beach, S l g-nature- California 92648•. ::. 7 3 5227 .--. - Puti i hed Huntington + :Beach-Fountain Valley Independent July 22,1999 074-207 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday, August 2, 1999, at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach,the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following item: ❑ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 98-89 (APPEAL) Applicant: KHR Associates , Tamara Schippers Appellants: Mobil Oil Company, Oil Max, and L.C. Smull, d.b.a. Business Properties Development Company Request: Appeal to Planning Commission's approval of a proposal to demolish approximately 2,500 square foot building (formerly used as a real estate office) and construct/establish an approximately 4,631 square foot, two (2) story automobile repair("limited") facility and re-stripe the "Drug Emporium" parking lot to include compact parking. Location: 9032 Adams Avenue (south side.of Adams Avenue, east of Magnolia Street) Planner Assigned: Amy Wolfe NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the above item is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library (7111 Talbert Avenue) after July 29, 1999. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any fi.irther questions please call the Planning Department at 536-5271 and refer to the above item. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 536-5227 (G:\LEGALS\COUNCIL\99\99cc802a.doc) PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA) SS. County of Orange ) merit—Company, Regques:- I am a Citizen of the United States and a NOTICE OF ::; Appeal to'Planning'Com PUBLIC-HEARING,' mission's approve 'of. a resident of the County aforesaid; I am BEFORE THE CITY; proposal to demolish ap- over the age of eighteen years and not a I COUNCIL OF THE..,,,proxiuildin: form square , CITY OF � foot building(formerly used HUNTINGTON BEACH as a real estate office)and party to or interested In the below NOTICE IS HEREBY constructlestablish an ap GIVEN that.on Monday, roximatelyy 4,631 square entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of �August 2,1999,at7:00PM• l?oot,two(2)storyautomo in the: CityCouncil bile repair("limited") facil- the HUNTINGTON BEACH INDEPENDENT a ' �ty and re-stripe the"Drug Chambers; 2000 Main y r Street, Huntington Beach, Emponurn ,parking lot to newspaper of general circulation, printed the CityCouncifwillholda include -9032 t'p sAV b public hearing on the Jol- Location:9032 Adams Av.' lowing-Item: enue(south side of Adams and pu fished In the City of Huntington Avenue, east of.Magnolia CONDITIONAL USE. .- "Street) Planner Assigned:_ Beach, County of Orange, State of PERMIT NO. t:KH (AP- Amy Wolfe PEAL)Applicant. ' S As'- .NOTICE IS HEREBY' , secs Appellants: Tamara "Sc S,P_, GIVEN that the above item California, and that attached Notice is a pers Appellants: Mobil Oil is categorically axe mpt Company,Oil Max;and true and complete copy as was printed L.C. Smull, d.b.a., Busi-. California from the provisions of"the, Environmental Hess Properties Develop-. Quality Act.- and published In the Huntington Beach ON FILE:.A copy of-the and Fountain Valley issues of said Proposed request is ve file m the Community Develop- newspaper to wit the issue(s) of: merit Department, o -Main Street, _Huntingtgtonn Beach,,California--92648, for inspection by.the public..' A copy of the staff report will be available -to in- teiested parties at City Hall or,the Main Ci Library er (7111 Talbert Avenue)'a- J u l y 22 , 1999 t.ALL INTERESTED PER: SONS:are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit "evi- dence for or against the ap- I declare, under penalty of perjury, that licationaslenge the Cit. P you.challenge-the-City Council's action in court, you may be limited to rais- the foregoing is true and correct. -mg-only-those=sues-you- or someone else raised at the--public. hearing":de- scribed'in-this notice,or in Written `correspondence. Executed on delivered tothe City at=or. July v 2 2 , 1 9 9 9 _ prior to,the public hearing. If there" are any further. at Costa Mesa, California. questions pplease callathe Planning .Department, at- 536-5271 and refer to the above -item. Direct-your- written communications to the City 'Clerk. Connie Brockway City'Clerk " Ctty of Huntington-Beach..r " 2000 Main Street 2nd Floor,- . Huntington Beach Signature California 92648 (714)536-5227- Published Huntington Beach-Fountain Valley Independent July 22,1999 074-207 Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beachc,eY Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 _ Huntington Beach, CA 92648 INGTpy Art Orta 17351 Lee Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Q Nrr ca`�� LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH TO: Janelle Case, Deputy City Clerk I FROM: Amy Wolfe, Associate Planner 4-0 SUBJECT: CD99-52 (CUP 98-89/Jiffy Lube) DATE: July 29, 1999 Please be advised that on July 28, 1999 the Planning Department hand-delivered notices for the August 2, 1999, City Council public hearing on CUP 98-89/Jiffy Lube to all shopping center tenants and service station facilities at the intersection of Magnolia and Adams Ave. This additional notification was not required by law and was provided to the aforementioned tenants as a courtesy. A copy of the notice distributed and a map showing the specific sites where notices were delivered has been attached for your reference and record NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday, August 2, 1999, at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following item: 0 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 98-89 (APPEAL) Applicant: KHR Associates , Tamara Schippers Appellants: Mobil Oil Company, Oil Max, and L.C. Smull, d.b.a. Business Properties Development Company Request: Appeal to Planning Commission's approval of a proposal to demolish approximately 2,500 square foot building (formerly used as a real estate office) and construct/establish an approximately 4,631 square foot, two (2) story automobile repair(`'limited") facility and re-stripe the `'Drug Emporium" parking lot to include compact parking. Location: 9032 Adams Avenue (south side of Adams Avenue, east of Magnolia Street) Planner Assigned: Amy Wolfe NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the above item is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library (7111 Talbert Avenue) after July 29, 1999. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning Department at 536-5271 and refer to the above item. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 536-5227 (G:\LE GALS\COUNCIL\99\99cc 802 a.doc) NEWLAND 0 oyy 8y 0 8 8y 8� °stl OS12 8511 8512 est 851: eSll r r ��+ �`� �' r • " 8522 r r ►� ►� �' �' Im' 8521 8522 O $sit SS22 x aS21 8522 832L ALLPORT �N. NORCROFT LN. m x a BSI1 6512 O 8521 8512 8531 9Sl2 x 8511 e312 -� 8511 o u u Y, Hit 6522 11 j 4 O w N u w w u N �' ; eS11 aSu IS61 9Su 8541 @Sol IS81 °S82 z IS41' r• esu esu �► esu z �yj 21 K 8561 8562 -V 0561 OS6: 85 8S Al 61 eS61 es62 @Sol 8562 8561 es62 as61 - p OS71 °s72 dC s71 es7 y� e56t es71 es7: es71 es» es7t es7: e571 REGAL CR. z pT °s 857 8 8572 v v sS81 es62 "esel °SB 581 ass 8581 es62 C1 8581 es62 esu es62 8Se1 B G IS91 es92 e591 e592 2 as 859 �CgrC es62 VINTAGE LN. mill e601 e602 e6ol e6o: e6o1 e6o: 0 � e» � 8 N Q i4 0 IV t+ " 119118611 8612ri `� 111 gill ►� 8611 6612 8611 8612 w �i w N li i'i u w N N N 4DREW CR. 8621 8622 0621 8622 N 0 0 0 0 ti N 8621 862: 67ti r Q9� 8611 8612 8671 8612 861t 8612 r r �r r r r k.' r r F ►. r 6 N N r not 6641 8642 IMPERIAL COVE LN. Lc 86 CR py yY y 0641 8642 8641 $642 x F = CA epz B6Sl 8652 8651 e652 8651 86s2 m � 1,q y� o e6s1 L y a °n2 CAMFIELO R G N N N N �T+� N N N N N C 8611 LN. e66t e662 'd o o o "d r 0 2 8682 C1 8681 0 8 y 0y 8 0 0 ° 0 �� �► C 6681 o '� V p u le y w e67I s671 e672 N N N N N N N N CROWN REEF I.N. 8692 x 9691 r� ►� .0 9702 8692 °662 9681 8682 N u _ n02 0 �+ N0 v 06910702 O Z n0l 8702 g s7ot not O 8701 0 �o Ib' 'rl .a. 8692 8691 8692 C a .�+ — .+ fl u 701 N l z N N N m e711 87ti Z nl2 o MEANDER an�� a7o1 not NEW BY LN. 8712 en1 ell 0 _ enl e7t: - •— I n:t•ei2 ^1 enl en: c1 72t e7n ' D 9722 8711 �~ ntl 8712 0 0 3 .a N 8711 872: �," �I' 8712 fi "•= w w n yn21�72 n21 8712 n:: Z nu N 3 872 _ 6712 , y ti� 6711 pl Au e7]i n 1 D D IVES LN. ns! n O C 1py� yyON 0 0 N N N N N N N N w' N N N n;2 v : r Ian 1�+ 1�+ Or ►o. r gg O = 'TI r r B, �°.+ C .. :: C C C fr 8 g Y 8752 D e762 8761 O r m L N, n61 6� 2 n TRANOUL LN. r en2 n71 24 y r (1 n71 8777 so,, N g N U) nee nel 1t N 0O c e781 878: r e77 ICG o 8 8 Al N N w y N N 8792 0 7a n91 8791 n92 n 8791 6792 0 o o ,pp0 8 8 OOp eeo2 P m CROFT LN.r asot aeo2 r R r C r r N r BellC C � � � umi a earl eet2 IAAYPORT LN. r m -1 $811 eel Z u N N BRENTST N f" ee:t ee: '� sell ee22 ee:l ee:: m 882t g 8 g eel: �I N N Be eel: een ee12r ;99gl—Z-a611 ee72 - r - � B ?! ?! 0 w eeu 88u eeu eeu =K ti C '� o >w . eeu 8842 '' ►' r ►�. .r- \ v ar r r r r r Best e852 N & ~ ` 3' LN. east e852 east e952 i— MURAL dAR^ ti �T. .� w ti�/�° c 8861 8862 � 6s61 es62 e861 w e86 MANS4,y �+ I" ti� i� x 8961 8862 68611 8862 m �+ r w „ w 0 m — 8871 8a72 and 8872 a n7: Z Y N N N z ee eel: em en: _ een '� 'i* seal 8892 3 68a1 e9s2 71 g �.• u O e861 see: east s .� ee92 O 0 N r 0 Z Beet ee92 8891 Beg: r r r ee92 0 r LN. e991 ee92 ee9t ee92 AS10R LN. s e902 GOTHIC C C 8912 DEN$b " .IA N 3 m e90! ego: 8901 ego: 0 ✓ $� 6911 Q CR p r 0 9 m e9ol 8902 w a w � 091: 7K 1923 al21 0 RF u 8 g C 8921 e922 v 0921 8922 O 51 m e92t n:2 m ?a w 8 a w $ g e912 89e1 "' f e911 e912 e971 8972 e921 0912 $ „`� „ ., r e911 e9s2 e�49t2 ns2 99s1 a "S1 e9s2 m e9S1 9s2 SW SE 0A KNI 0 0 0LN. 9972 9962 0% N i e961 6962 Q96L �i' r,, rw" .�,, ki ��, .C„ w MAGNOLIA $Z d11ONOdW N 9 n �Nq n N p a w 19 a w a a a $ tr ZL69 r iL61 .. 0 1s61 'N1 SONIMIUM =�� 1►6/ e[is T[6p 1C iC68 It68 a Else TC69 1060 e6s 1169 1169 1169 1168 [r Ze69 1166 �169 a" U U a - U U U =C69 nH 0 1169 tl6B W ti68 INS J it68 76i et6p ri6p Z Zi68 e6p J rt6p 1169 LZ6B t161 ZZ6p 1f69 V 1i68 1168 1168 n60 0 1166 n68 1169 1168 O 1168 16 C168 116 W 1169 1160 L168 1 t69 C7 i06/ ZObt i061 Z068 068 9060 1069 W 1066 106 CO 066 06 [069 r068 Y 1066 1066 i06p 6069 C. 16t1 i6Bt `bot, tQdb ti� r�i 16BG Q 1608 `�G �qio r� ��9 ew 1686 i6tp 6��=/� 6691 _^� Ttt1 tope N n gN rN N " IN121 N W n N f� nSLNMSSBBPJqQ TL1t d i 3 1,1 a a$ a a Ir ups �c99 i6,� irBt lLt1 .ai - .v .q .v .� .r .v .r m .� .� .v .v .v .v .� .� .� .a .r .v Z9Bp t988 1908 1908 •N-i IN30181 a ` it lep sCp1 tat isle isle a tr716L , a ry ma J zspp i$p� Ls1EE ccep logs (� N a a C. a a a T °1 Pv .v .� ,r ,� ,� - .v i[eg twill I goi[1/ pp N n n n n N n n N n n n ices legs Else i�ri88 jai .v .a .. .v .v .irin list TZBB rigs nee 0 Sf1VYH1Sl Cr c18t The ties .� mm .r ..126L8 i6LB 9068 a a °� °�` a s a a m $ �m .� r . .r . .r � .� r Z N tOLO ills Q °�'� ^ '" "' W e 0 Z 'Ni OaVMONIM i9L8 0 'N1 pJluvnIpS3 N V O tsts N i� iSLg o o g env n m $ nr M TSLI Q Y P P a D6 Z O a a a a a T a w a a n I mZILB � '>i H -� ti N1 3311013 0 tilt 3 m LZLB IZLB y rtL } llJ Me tee CILB rile zue sue t a Z 4: =lLB Z tics Ills [1r Cr [r 1r t 1 1696 1696 20Le LB O CiLg 1Lt 0 CILB nl1 O Me ITLI O CIL1 I c$ 41°9 W ZOL1 OLB COLS TOLB =Olt TOL1 16go i898 U 1999 NI 1IVAW30 $ ' 1098 Q 169B 699 1696 T698 1690 1690 logoAl ti n iL98 cr EL9e Z iL96 1898 189E 899 1098 1698 Logo 1996 1991 t998 1998 = 1998 = eggs 1990 N1 1S,��j 'S9R U CL 9990 1998 1998 T999 Z998 1990 I iS91 Z tS9t NRn N0 i59g IS96 1698 i598 1S9t IS96 1690 _ i998 wOZt9F It'q Z►9t Zt'li It9B Z/9p 1►9g t/98 t/9B logo0 VH3d01 EL9N Il"! ZC91 1191! Z198 1198 Z198 1196 1198 i198 r[98 I togs ' 719b ':, a _ - .- li'". W n " m fed Z199 i190 MIR IZ!ps 1999 1Z96 C198 TUB =l9t 1091 Y Z $ °_ P P �� i Ito% 1099 1096 WIN 1099 t099 1098 love 1098 1090 16se -i if UN I a o N n v m c 1�!I; O i NSN �o N °' n ��� W ibitl 165E Q ZbS9 1659 O t6:B i6Se "- 16SP IUS1 Q t6Se W. � lr � I Nl a3AN30 i�c8. 'N1 _ - XIN30Nd-- ILUI � tN.1 LL restl tlsg 0 rose mr, 00 Ztls1 rtsp CL � toss 1958 f- 1%9 7h!f x e 79Sk W 1!, L'1 J iLSB its/ Use Use Y ZLSs iLSB 3 ZLss QISSB ZSStliSB SSB 0VA, „atest iSsBiSS 1SS1 2SS iSSp J iS/lal ►S/ 1►Se i/S8 iS8 ZISt TtSB J I/St i/Sp W CtSe 5 ZK 1►sI list rose N1 01N3WVa0VS Erse N1 AIHVIHB csg nee m m m:tA °n "' I� aaa771 ^' • rr•n r"a°---I&I IVII1V11�V�-�r'� 9002 3 9001 9002 N FLORA C PEACH 9022 9021 N ro N _ ��fJ,Cy_ ----t 901: m 903190) _ 1� O N FED_ � m z 9�o i D 9osli old 0 1- ` 7}[��3 n m ,n Z 9061 D i Z ' `� �1 fy y09 "7 D 9071.9012N Z °. u. QV C 09 Z90e1, 90" 9112 092Z Q) 9091 I9048 D O o 9tt2 H 9062r L 9122 9111 ' 0 0 c- 0 o N M ��D v 9132 9121 p w �" • yy� 29�219122 9092 r r �1 r -3� -� p N I62 p O r r• N N NIto W fTl 9142 911 o'o.; u U 'r 1¢�! 9131 92» 9121 o •I o l�+g"'-*V- - 9152 ~ u N9141 9112 9171 �'f?fro I8l3 . JOFINSON LN 9162 r Ir r r r a NIL 1 i v ! �� 9162 2 9162 9181 N o o m 0 9161 9162 N 9161 9141. 9172 9172 $ 9171 9172 9171 9172 91b1�� N SHOREWOOO CR. 0 KELVINGROVE LN 9171 $ N N f1 0 9t72 9171 Igo, 9182 9292 O 91e1 9182 g 9102 181 91e2 917!' ���} ro g 91et 91et N $ $• C 91e2 91e1 uj u~ 9l92 9191 9292 9191 9192 D 9191 9192 EiW 9192 1191 N I �' w 9202 9202 9201 202 9201 9202 9202 y Li 9201 9202 HARBOR ISLE LN 92119t11 A R LN. 9212 9211 21 N N N w aoN' N u 9222 9221 9222 9221 V b N G N kI E E Z D CHANNEL • yp M N y'V N N N N N N N y y N N ti �° N Al N N w NNp yp yp D 9272 J Y O 0O O~ \\ Y 1 Y 41 I O O O O N 1Q O w r O y O O 'A bt .. t r VJ 92e MOONCREST CR °, �� RAMONA LN a MARINA N. r '^ 9 92 A 929 '¢ ' 0 ,b .'pJ 9261 927 0 o ' 0 o II 0 "d I g 9:91 9292 0 0 o N o QN 9292 u't • �. l 6- Z 5S �+ 9)0 _„ _ I}R_ �. �,. 9291 9292 A N N N N N N N N INI N ly+ TITAN Y "¢ 0116 `a. 9292 D �+ Y u o 0 0 0 BOIL I9102 D I� 9701QCtE 9312 D 9)1N 0 ♦ .}_-- 9]OL 9102 r t N r r r t.- Z9712 vENus cR 4 ADRIAN CR. v gill 9312 r 9)u9]22 l R. o ''o 9]2� lD 0 o o'oo o •I7 Ni 9722 m 9]21 9772 (C/) 9)]1 r.9)/l 9142 . N N N 9332 0 N N N N •N ►� ? •1342- (J — --- -+ 0 9)11 9112 9)/l 9152 91/2 9]S O w w N k'i N 9)6 r 91/2Ni N �ti 9752 O 93s2 9)SI O St r r r r r r r t N 9751 •b �I r 2S 9162 ANCHOR 9762 9761 9152 BANCROFT CR. ow 9362 9761 9362 9361 f•'f ��,o, ►. �. `. r r r N 937: $ Np 9172 93 2 B MOONTIDE CR. 11 Q Q N]e2 yyp 91e2 93e18 N N 0 o 0 93e1 9392 392 y LL toti L�tO 1 'rN9]92 9M, yN 9191 9192 0 9/02 TCELAND LN EASTWOOD CR. 9102 9401 9402 9/01 lj ro 11 N2 Q •�, 9411 O 1 rf ► :- r r ►u- qA r e Jj 9/12 9111 9112 0 0 ?i 9412 ffj((AA -- Q �'. �j �,. �•+ N N N � 9421 G PORT x CR 9432 4 9u: 0 0 0 0 I 0 9431 9422 L<oL o 1S 0 9112 9/11 9112 0 9112 ` 9111 9432 ATEA 902 �DEERVALE LN of 91s, ?� o . C NJ 9472 o G `� 9172 ` Ci 9/62 w w w N BUSHARD , OUVHsne 106 ug �+ it►s Q z Ti►6 G 9606 T6►6 G i6►6 Tits G e6K,16K O ISM IX Ups lots1116 cots UK Itts i t►►f -cpps"- ills n « n M n Tr Ups CC►6 1906 [[►{ t[►f it►i; i{-►i :�K�ILii6 .w� ic►i teK tt►6 M$ lets gets lips_r_ t:►f Tea .. 1 30N301AOad i1K _�►6 TT_►6 t1►6 TT►6 tt►6 TT►6 i.TT►6 ww iw F F �I — �.�_ LTIf. 16 6 r6[f i6[6 i6E6 3fL>r cf[6 i6[6 ZiCt i ,�R n e'v n l iv w n r n n n t [ 9816 lets - lets Leff° TYC6 "� N I RI uc6 life ratsw '>" >f"I >A iIi I([6 LL[67TLC6 tiii gn6 lK6 t9cs 19ic e9cst Lcc6 lu6 Nl 831S305619 9C6 Isis ciEl 16ti . T9ts .� _ tsc6 L6cf lief 19Ef life — tiff i6[s i 9K6 iK6 c►[6 ilCs e1[6 t/[6 ;11n MG9116 tcc6 e116 Tfff t116+t[c6 a Ins T►[� p w I w �' a I • ,� �, ` p .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ., .. .. .. .. .. .. ..I ., tits = tt[6 O Iffl- W - tiff 11c6 V t� lets O gets Y gets IZE6 N� OVWOlOd tics toff tots () gas CA gets g tots IK6 10[6 ^ • tl[6 u „'^ • N • n ^ • loft N O z IK6 TK6 X o a gfl6 Ifi6 �"' e6t6 1616 t eels'. l696 z W '� —-+ �+_ �+ •+ I •wi a 16L6 W n n ` r, a cKf i62f [1_ gels 16e6 i/lf ' Q, '�� X Z X _ Lech I tics V Le16 TeEf 1696 �3 'N1 �+ ANndH 1VM 1916 19L6 3HV3dVS3H0 N1 z ^ n Li w i4 .a i.� .a a rc I y1 '4 .r w o .a .r 1.4 .. I.+ .� R .+ .+ ���r � n 1 I� in. M w w.4l° cc 0 1 It I"I"ITax N 111,11,11 11 �' oc6 Nl '1V1N301000 t°tb Q Nl Sn10'1 616 ~ tf16 4616 1616 i6i6 e16 p ^ w 0 !6 p� ,, O r6T6 V� isle lets U LT6 ix iL1f LLt61L16 ILi6 J Q O Ceti IlYI6 O 9916 laic e916 Tei6 efts L9Tf c9T6 2 3 X r T9i0 19T6 W CLi6 TLi6 9916 '1916 O 9916 9t6 1616 NI A3Snna -*' 1616 9616 _ ales t616 LL. tiTf TiT6 Tits cc 05= J i6i-6 E 1 its V 1616 r►tf N U Q cots .TIT6 1 t►T6 'NI OOOMA tots lots flee efts 1116 > c►1e 1116 1116 Q 0 g T6 ' [lf it O W = � isle T[i6 tJ 161e G egTi J Tei6 �]m V w calf . gLT6 1 16 'L 1116 W '�( 19T6 Z CA w 9116 iris 1916_ _rill iris 0 riTf lief w LTT6 tii6 tits r` T116 tl O 0 3 O leis TLi6 1016 1016 Q e0T6 n 1016 L0i6 Vr 9 LOTT 1i16 a c016 1016 a IOif if0f �' c60f ,w, „j I60f i606 W Z C� 1606 1606 L Stoic 06 11 U ZIOG 1606 Nl NOSU30NVS 1906 2 Z Q 0) Le06 1906 ee061, en s[o6 sL11o066 1e06 z tfo6� ti N '' N '' n n tL06 _ eL06 TL06 d' tLOE l; N Lf06 i1o6 190f o ��' ^ .4 X X 9906 tJ p O i906 I cco6 ii0i WW. ti0s W Q Z Ir 9606 1606 m —y 6106 5006 L►Of » '�' a X x J L►O6 Y Q W c►06 i/06 t►06� 6e06 Leos C006 1► W 11106 ---- WLIO i O6 �' iC06 6L06 Nl �i01d300b n Z F— ILO6 t�OS "4 41,4 O it .1. n 9106 Hlldd d T706 LLO6 L906 low 1006 2133NO1d 1006 6906 ,- bIIONObW 1 fyy p r CUP 98-89 lifly Lube 9032 Adams Ave 7129/99 812199 City Council Hearing 1. l _ ram" -.---e s CEO .- > rn r 5. n C7 Project location v App.1501 SE Adams/ Magnolia Ave • General Plan subarea - 8A -- adjacent to"Drug Emporium/Carl's Jr." f - - center 7129199 812199 City Council Hearing 2 � 3 1 SE corner Adams/Magnolia x 7/29/99 812199 City Council Hearing 3 1 NW corner Adams/Magnolia = s r 4 a IS fx.. 7/29/99 812199 City Council Hearing 4 2 s` == NW corner Adams/ Magnolia a $„S 3 i - Y� 7/29/99 812199 City Council Hearing 5 Residential properties p adjacent to retail center g 7129199 812199 City Council Hearing 6 3 � Project Proposal Demolish an existing 2,482 sq.fL,1-story structure Construct a 4,631 sq.fr,2-story structure Establish a drive-through vehicle oil change facility-[!iffy Lube] Re-stripe the"Drug-Emporium/Carl's Jr." center parking lot : 7/29/99 812/99 City Council Hearing 7 3: I !iffy tube Project Description Building/Parkinu - Three level main structure f4,631 sq.fLl • Gazebo/screen-Adams Ave • 3 two-car service bays - 15parking spaces Mon site/14 adjacent shopping center 1/Re- striping to accommodate 65 compact parking spaces 7/29/99 812199 City Council Hearing 8 4 Project Analysis General Plan Compliance • Goals,Objectives,Policies: - land Use Element - Cc/General Commercial land use district - Sub-area BA - Urban Design Element d— t 7129/99 812199 City Council Hearing 9 Project Analysis A.{ • Project will not enhance or establish desirable Identley for the neighborhood • Project will not improve the visual character of the Magnolia/ Adams Corridors 'k Project development will diminish future opportunities for comprehenslve redevelopment of the site with a pedestrian orientation IK 7/29/99 812199 City Council Hearing 10 5 Project Analvsis NBZSO Compliance I The llffy Lube parcel Is technically in compliance with the following development standards: — Parking — Circulation x — Landscaping • The Jiffy Lube development does not meet the Intent of NBZSO and City requirements pertaining to full screening/enclosing service bay areas previously Imposed by the Planning Commission 7129/99 812/99 City Council Hearing 11 i 5/25/99 _~ Planning Commission Nearing Planning Commission Action • Conditional Approval • imposed additional conditions requiring landscaping Improvements on the shopping center and Carl's Jr.because: — Majority of required parking for Jiffy tube Is proposed on the shopping center parcel — Reciprocal access/parking agreement encompasses all shopping center parcels — Jiffy tube and shopping center parcel are owned by the some property owner 7129/99 8/2/99 City Council Hearing 12 . 6 s Planning Commission Hearing g � F - Follow-Up Actions Y : : Appeals • L-C.Smull f Jiffy Lobe/Shopping Center property owner l • 011-Max/Mobil 011 Community Petition in Opposition of fi -Lube 7/29/99 812199 City Council Hearing 13 8/2/99 City Council Action Staff Recommendation • Deny CUP No.98-89 Planning Commission Recommendation X : Approve CUP No.98-89 with finding and conditions of { approval gk. Applicant's Request E • Approve CUP No.98-89 w/o landscaping Improvement conditions for adlacent parcels 7129199 8099 City Council Hearing 14 7 'cr - R -,�.5.-c: 5. - ut k "t-„S .vS'vJ t x # y -rt t,sYsw -ti f•"' s' III"Address�of}Perrmttu►g� �Perirut�Number s ��f %Action Required�tiy tut ,ermtthn �Aathorit City of Huntington Beach - 00-697,Permit For Right-Of-Way Send letter on company Public Works Department, Encroachment, Groundwater letterhead listing old name, 2000 Main Street, Monitoring and Sampling Project (for new name and title of Huntington Beach, CA, Mobil Station No. 18-D9R, 16001 agreement and send copy of 92648, Att: Risk Beach Blvd.,Huntington Beach, updated insurance forms to: Management Orange County) City of Huntington Beach - Public Works Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA, 92648, Att: Risk Management 00-698,Permit For Right-Of-Way Send letter on company Encroachment, Groundwater letterhead listing old name, Monitoring and Sampling Project (for new name and title of Mobil Station No. 18-G31, 5972 agreement and send copy of Warner Ave., Huntington Beach, updated insurance forms to: Orange County) City of Huntington Beach - Public Works Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA, 92648, Att: Risk Management 00-690,Permit For Right-Of-Way Send letter on company Encroachment, Groundwater letterhead listing old name, Monitoring and Sampling Project(for new name and title of Mobil Station No. 18-G6G, 19001 agreement and send copy of Magnolia St.,Huntington Beach, updated insurance forms to: Orange County) City of Huntington Beach- Public Works Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA, 92648, Att: Risk Management CITY OF HUNTING°TON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CONNIE BROCKWAY CITY CLERK September 9, 1999 Mr. L. C. Smull Business Properties Development Company 17631 Fitch P.O. Box 19586 Irvine, California 92623-9586 Dear Mr. Smull: The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held Monday, August 2, 1999 approved as amended the appeal for Conditional Use Permit 98-89 with Findings and Conditions for approval (amended). This is a final decision. You are hereby notified that pursuant to provisions of Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the State of California you have ninety days from September 9, 1999 to apply to the courts for judicial review. If you have any questions regarding this matter,please contact our office at 714/536-5227. Sincerely, Connie Brockway, CMC City Clerk Enclosure: Findings for Approval Government Code 1094.6 Cc: City Administrator City Attorney Howard Zelefsky, Planning Director Scott Hess, Principle Planner Amy Wolfe, Associate Planner (Telephone:714-536-5227) § 1094.5 SPF,CIAI. PROCEEDINGS Part 3 Note 378 n.:nulrtl for new trial ele no",. Prrsrod v. minea v,unn i>-�innvr hod too juri.,lielinn citiiforriin u,wi tploynreot lt,s. .\}-peak lt,l, and dirt not drlrrtnlue iiwrits. Western Air t1tl7tl) 1::7 CuLRlttr, 610. 57 l'.A3,1 2.9. 1.1ut•s ltu•, v, tiohiraki (tmi) 17 Cnl.ltptr. Trinl courCtt judgatent d,•n3iug wrl( of ?IP. 11)1 C.A."d 31)11• ntnutlute to compel director ttf ngrirultnro IrnrL that letter discharging senior tyit- to set aside his det•ision revoking prtltion- isl ol,•rk in offiee of court' clerk slnted er's license its aircraft pilot ill hasiness of Mutt she ,,:ts guilty of utisronduct in re- pest eontrol A'ns reversed uud core re utovirtg ltuhliv records front din files and tunneled to trial court. willt directions to uttttilating nnel seerrting tltetn on various remand ense to dirretor for purpose of elutes, whereas ill hearing before couuly 1 rveonsiderittg the pr.tutlty previously iut- civil sorvice cnnttnission evidence w+tn in- posed, where it wns found that norne of troduccd only nit ro witnt took Place on rho charges against Petitioner were not ant: of thr dates, did not require the dial- snpported by evidence. Wingfielel v. t ric•t court of alp}teal on ni.lwal front judg- Direc•ror of Agriculture (1117.1) 1W Cal. rnent awarding senior typist clerk writ of Ctptr.619, 29 C'.AZI 209. mandate, lifter reversing iho judgmeut of Proccedit,g for revlew of denial by runt- the superior vourt, to rentnnd the matter misstoner of rarpornlions of permit to to the c•„tntnission fur re,•onsideration, r issio voting rights of f I)c llllt to wltcre flit-re nas n similarity of facts sur- w�uld he otinnndrrl t superior court for rolliidiug removal of the 11,t-tutunts (in :tll duterntiunrion whether there tuna suhslnu: t(ify the dotes. Pratt v, Los .lttt(1les Coun- tiul evidence to support connniseiouer's t}'.tC:3, �enicr.' l'onttnisaiuu (190`l) 2:r8 fiudings, where court improperly deter. 1' d'3,lUti C.A:t1 Ile. § 1094.6. Judicial review; decisions of local agencies; petition; filing; time; record; decision and Marty defined; or- dinance or resolution (a) Judicial review of any decision of a local agemY, other than school district, as the term local agency is defined in Section 54951 of. the Government Code, or of any commission, board, officer or agent tll,.•reof, may be had pursuant to Section -1094:5 of this code only if the petition for writ;of mandate pursuant to such section is filed -,vithin the time limits:specified in this section. (b) Any such petition shall be filed not later than the 90th day following the date on which the decision becomes final If there is no provision for reconsideration of the decision in any applicable provi- sion of any statute, charter, or rule, for the purposes of this section, the decisi�` is final on the date it is made. If there is such provision for reconsideration, the decision is final for the put-poses of this sec- tion upon the expiration of the period during which such rteconsidera- tinn can be sought; provided, that if reconsideration is sought pursu- ant to_any such provision the decision is final for the purposes of this section on the date that reconsideration is rejected. (c) The c:omplety r'ca:ord of the proceedings shall Ix, prepared by hic log:;►I ogollc•y or its c onunis;ion, lm:fret, officer, or agent which made the decision and shall be delivered to the pel.itioner within 90 Bays after he has filed a written request therefor. The local agency may recover from the petitioner its actual costs for transcribing or otherwise preparing the record. Such record shall include the tran- Script of thu proceedings, all pleadings, all notices and larders, any proposed decision by a hearing officer, the final decision, all admitted 674 t Title 1 WRIT OF MANDATE § 1094.6 exhibits, all rejected exhibits in the possession of the local agency or its commission, board, officer, or agent, all written evidence, and any other papers in the case. (d) If thu petiliancr files a rcqursl for (hr record as specified in sllhilivisittn (c') wilhin 10 clays ,tflor the flair fhc decision becomes fi- nal as provided in subdivision (b), Ilio time wilhin which a petition pul:sunnt to Section 1094.5 may he filed shall he extended to not later than the 30th day following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the petitioner or his attorney of rec- ord, if he has one. (e) As used in this-section, decision means adjudicatory admin- istrative decision made, after hearing, suspending, demoting, or dis- missing an officer or employee, revoking or denying an application for a permit or a license, or denying an application for any retire- ment benefit or allowance. (f) In making a final decision as defined in subdivision (e), the local agency shall provide notice to the party that the time within which judicial review must be sought is governed by this section. As used in this subdivision, "party" means an officer or em- ployee who has been suspended, demoted or dismissed; a person whose permit or license has been revoked or whose application for a permit or license has been denied; or a person whose application for a retirement benefit or allowance has been denied. (g) This section shall be applicable in a local agency only if the governing board thereof adopts an ordinance or resolution making this section applicable.... If such ordinance or resolution is adopted, the provisions of this section shall prevail over any conflicting provision in any otherwise applicable law relating to the subject matter. (Added by Stats.1976, c.276, p. 681, § 1.) Forms 'ice West%, California Cade Forme,Civit Procedure. Library References Admiuirtrntive Imv and Provelur:- C.d.".. Public Administrative Bodies and 0-7:!2. Procedure § 193. Notes of Decisions In general I lhnt public employment rlationx lwnrd Exhaustion of administrative remedies 2 luut cx,•lu�ivb Jurisilietlou to dctonnine whedwr the unfair pructice churgex were Juxtificd; and, in view of teachers' failure 11) exhnnst thrir ndminintrttive remeclicx 1. In general under the Itodrht Acl, trial court erred in lrhoul hourd'x 'tu:ilnlnrnl frvezing of granting writ of mandute to nompol Super- lrmw•hr ns' xnlurirx nfr,•r hr);innilig of ne". infendent of dixtricl rind othrrx to'ruixr School year, while cnnlrnol ❑-gotinliutrx S:rinri•S of eertnin tr!acheru. Amndor Vul- wery pending, nrguahly %wix nit unfair Ir•t• 8-•141uhrry I-Aucnlors Axa1r A. Newlin prucliec iu violution of thr: ftoddu Art xo (1970) 151 Cul.ltptr. 724, M C.A31 7G.J. 675 CITY OF HUN'T'INGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CONNIE BROCKWAY CITY CLERK August 12, 1999 KHR Associates Tamara Schippers 2355 Main Street Irvine CA 92614 Dear Tamara Schippers: The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held Monday, August 2, 1999, approved with conditions the appeal filed by L.C. Smull, dba Business Properties Development Company, Mobile Oil Company, and Oil Max. and upheld the Planning Commission's decision to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 98-89. Findings and conditions are enclosed. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact our office at (714) 536-5227. Sincerely, e � Connie Brockway, CMC City Clerk Cc: Howard Zelefsky, Planning Director Scott Hess, Associate Planner Amy Wolfe, Associate Planner g:\followup\Jetters\091897 (Telephone:714536-5227) I 4j"je CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Lj2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CONNIE BROCKWAY CITY CLERK September 1, 1999 Chuck Ball Business Properties 17631 Fitch Irvine CA 92614 Dear Mr. Ball: The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held Monday, August 2, 1999, approved with conditions the appeal filed by L.C. Smull, dba Business Properties Development Company, Mobile Oil Company, and Oil Max. and upheld the Planning Commission's decision to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 98-89. Findings and conditions are enclosed. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact our office at (714) 536-5227. Sincerely, Connie Brockway, CIVIC City Clerk Cc: Howard Zelefsky, Planning Director Scott Hess, Associate Planner Amy Wolfe, Associate Planner g:\fol IowupVetters\091897 (Telephone:714-536-5227) i R EC.EIVED BUSINESS PROPERTIES CITY CLERK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY L� CITY OF 17631 FITCH • P.O.BOX 19586 NJINTINGTON BEACH,CA IRVINE,CALIFORNIA 92623-9586 (949)474-8000 1999 SEP -I P 0' L FAX(949)474-8936 September 2, 1999 Ms. Connie Brockway City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Second Floor Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Re: C.U.P. 98-89 9032 Adams Avenue Jiffy Lube Dear Ms. Brockway: We have been advised by the Planning Department that your office would issue the list of Conditions of Approval on CUT 98-89 revised pursuant to City Council Action August 2, 1999. We have not received the revised "Conditions of Approval" and would appreciate receiving same as soon as possible. Sincerely, CLA2 Charles G. Ball CGB/pm PHOENIX OFFICE 8024 NORTH 24TH AVENUE,SUITE 310, PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85021 • (602)995-9113 FAX(602)995-0809 FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 98-89 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 98-89: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 98-89 for the establishment, maintenance and operation of a 4,361 sq. ft. vehicle equipment repair facility and re-striping of the commercial center to include 65 compact spaces will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. The project will improve the overall appearance of the intersection and complement the adjacent commercial center. The proposed Jiffy Lube would also act as the impetus for future redevelopment of the existing retail center and will provide an additional service to the residents and a revenue source to the City. 2. The conditional use permit will be compatible with surrounding uses due to the commercial character of the neighboring center and the existing service stations at the Adams and Magnolia Avenue intersection. The proposed service bay screen walls are properly integrated within the building design. 3. The proposed vehicle repair facility will comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and any specific condition required for the proposed use in the district in which it would be located. The project complies with the development standards, parking and landscaping requirements of Chapter 211,231, and 232 respectively. 4. The granting of the conditional use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan. It is consistent with the Land Use Element designation of General Commercial on the subject property. In addition, it is consistent with the following goals and policies of "the General Plan: Policy LU 10.1.4 Require that commercial buildings and sites be designed to achieve a high level of architectural and site layout quality. Policy LU 10.1.12 Require that Commercial General uses be designed and developed to achieve a high level of quality, distinctive character, and compatibility with existing uses and development including the consideration of g. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. h. If the lot is not considered exempt by FEMA, a second elevation certificate shall be submitted to the Planning Department for the project"as built." 7. The use shall comply with the following: a. There shall be no outside storage of vehicles, vehicle parts, equipment or trailers. c. All repair work shall be conducted wholly within the building; no servicing of vehicles outside of the building. d. Hours of operation shall be limited to between 7:00am— 8:00pm (Monday through Sunday). e. Only the uses described in the narrative attached to the May 25, 1999 Planning Commission Staff Report shall be permitted. f. No vehicles shall encroach into the 24 ft. wide reciprocal access to the adjacent service station. 8. The Planning Director ensures that all conditions of approval herein are complied with. The Planning Director shall be notified in writing if any changes to the site plan, elevations and floor plans are proposed as a result of the plan check process. Building permits shall not be issued until the Planning Director has reviewed and approved the proposed changes for conformance with the intent of the Planning Commission's action and the conditions herein. If the proposed changes are of a substantial nature, an amendment to the original entitlement reviewed by the Planning Commission may be required pursuant to the HBZSO. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 98-89 shall not become effective until the ten-day appeal period has elapsed. 2. Conditional Use Permit No. 98-89 shall become null and void unless exercised within one year of the date of final approval or such extension of time as may be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. 3. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Conditional Use Permit No. 98-89, pursuant to a public hearing for revocation, if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance or Municipal Code occurs. 4. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid. (PW) 5. Traffic Impact Fees shall be paid at the time of final inspection or issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. (PV ) 6. An encroachment permit shall be required for all work within the right-of-way. (PW) 7. A Certificate of Occupancy must be issued by the Planning Department prior to occupying the building. 8. State-mandated school impact fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. 9. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, Building Department, and Fire Department as well as applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards, except as noted herein. 10. Construction shall be limited to Monday- Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. 11. All signs shall conform to applicable Planned Sign Program for the retail center. Prior to installing any new signs, or changing sign faces, a building permit shall be obtained from the Planning Department. 12. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of$38.00 for the posting of the Notice of Exemption at the County of Orange Clerk's Office. The check shall be made out to the County of Orange and submitted to the Planning Department within two (2) days of the Planning Commission's action. A/a nner Council/Agency Meeting Held: fI- .Z-9 9 Deferred/Continued to: ®Ap roved ❑ Conditionally Approved ❑ Denied 4090. City Clerk's Signatur J --r Council Meeting Date: August 2, 1999 Department ID Number: CD99-52 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH -. a-7 -1-, REQUEST FOR ACTION SUBMITTED TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS SUBMITTED BY: - RAY SILVER, City Administrator PREPARED BY: HOWARD ZELEFSKY, Director of Planning 14+_4z__11 SUBJECT: DENY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 98-89 (Jiffy Lube at Adams & Magnolia) (Appealed by L.C. Smull and Oil Max/Mobil Oil) Statement of Issue,Funding Source,Recommended Action,Alternative Action(s),Analysis,Environmental Status,Attachment(s) Statement of Issue: Transmitted for your consideration are two appeals (L.C. Smull — project property owner, and a joint appeal by Oil Max and Mobil Oil) of the May 25, 1999, Planning Commission's action to approve Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 98-89. The subject request is to establish a 4,631 sq. ft. two story, drive through vehicle equipment repair facility (Jiffy Lube) and restripe an existing shopping center to include compact parking. On May 25, 1999, the Planning Commission approved the subject request with the requirement for additional landscaping on the adjacent shopping center site to comply with ZSO requirements. Staff recommended denial of Conditional Use Permit No. 98-89 based upon project non-compliance with the General Plan and Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (ZSO). The property owner appealed the request in order to have the City Council delete Planning Commission's conditions requiring landscaping upgrades to the adjoining shopping center. The joint appeal is to have the City Council overturn the Planning Commission's action and deny the subject proposal due to non-compliance with the General Plan policies. Staff is not able to support this project and is continuing to recommend denial of the proposal (Recommended Action "A") because of fundamental underlying issues related to the type of the land use, its location and service bay orientation to a major arterial/ image path/ landscape corridor. The Planning Commission recommends approval (Recommended Action "B"). The property owner (L.C. Smull) is requesting approval with modifications to the conditions of approval (Alternative Action) and the joint appelants (Oil Max/Mobil Oil) are supporting Staffs recommendation for denial (Recommended Action "A"). Funding Source: Not applicable. REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: August 2, 1999 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD99-52 Recommended Actions: "A." STAFF RECOMMENDATION (Oil Max/Mobil Oil Appelant's Request): Motion to: "Deny Conditional Use Permit No. 98-89 with findings for denial (ATTACHMENT NO. 1)" "B." PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Motion to: "Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 98-89 with findings and conditions of approval which include the landscaping improvements to the adjacent shopping center (ATTACHMENT NO. 2)." Planninq Commission Action on May 25, 1999: THE MOTION MADE BY BIDDLE, SECONDED BY LAIRD, TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 98-89 WITH FINDINGS AND MODIFIED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CARRIED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: LIVENGOOD,CHAPMAN, BIDDLE, LAIRD NOES: KERINS .ABSENT: MANDIC, SPEAKER ABSTAIN: NONE MOTION PASSED Alternative Action: PROPERTY OWNER'S REQUEST: Motion to: "Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 98-89 with findings and modified conditions of approval deleting the conditions relative to landscape improvements to the adjacent shopping center." CD99-52 -2- 07/26/99 5:41 PM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: August 2, 1999 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD99-52 Analysis: A. PROJECT PROPOSAL: Applicant: KHR Associates/Tamara Schippers 2355 Main Street Irvine, CA 92614 Location: One hundred and sixty (160) ft east of the Adams Avenue and Magnolia Street intersection, on the south side of Adams Avenue. Conditional Use Permit No. 98-89 represents a request for the following: A. Construct a 4,631 sq. ft. two-story (plus basement) structure pursuant to Section 211.04 CO, CG, and CV Districts: Land Use Controls; B. Establish a drive-through vehicle equipment repair use (Jiffy Lube) pursuant to Section 211.04 Vehicle Equipment Repair, and L-5 Limited Facilities, of ZSO; and C. Re-stripe the commercial center parking area to include compact parking pursuant to Section 231.20. Compact Parking of the ZSO. The proposed facility will replace an existing, vacant 2,482 sq. ft. real estate office building. The subject parcel is part of a commercial center with reciprocal parking and access. The Jiffy Lube structure consists of three levels. A customer waiting area and six service/repair bays are proposed to be located on the ground level. Technicians will perform vehicle repairs from the basement level, thus eliminating the need to install pneumatic lifts. Storage and mechanical equipment area will be accommodated on the third level. A gazebo and trellis/screen wall is proposed adjacent to Adams Avenue. The facility will operate Monday through Friday from 7:00 am to 8:00 pm. Thirteen employees consisting of a manager, assistant manager, cashier and 10 automotive technicians (5-9 employees per shift) will be present at the facility at any one time. Six vehicles may be serviced within the building at one time. The applicant anticipates that the facility will serve a maximum of 50-75 customers per day, with weekend business being higher but not exceeding 100 customers per weekend day. Re-striping of the subject parcel, adjacent Carl's Jr. parcel and commercial center parcel are part of the request. This involves elimination of 11 of the 12 parking spaces on the subject parcel and an increase of the parking on the commercial center and Carl's Jr. site from 333 to 360 parking spaces (inclusive of 65 compact spaces which constitute 18% of total parking). The adjacent commercial center is owned by the same property owner as the subject property and there is a reciprocal parking and access agreement between the CD99-52 -3- 07/26/99 5:17 PM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: August 2, 1999 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD99-52 subject parcel, Carl's Jr. and the main commercial center. The following table depicts the number of approved and proposed parking spaces on each parcel affected by the parking re- striping request: PARCEL PARCEL SQT APPRO�/ED PARKING PROPOSED, PLAN AS OF 1996m PARKING Subject Parcel 15,000 sq. ft. 12 parking spaces 1 parking spaces Commercial Center 245,853 sq. ft. 313 parking spaces 340 parking spaces (w/ 58 compact) Carl's Jr. 16,000 sq. ft. 20 parking spaces 20 parking spaces (w/ 7 compact) Total 345 parking spaces 361 parking spaces (w/65 compact) The applicant contends that the use (ATTACHMENT NO. 3) will provide services oriented to the needs of the local residents and will contribute in achieving a range of commercial uses in accordance with General Plan policies. HistooL A request for the establishment of a similar facility (CUP No. 96-58/ Jiffy Lube) was presented to the Planning Commission in 1996. Staff did not support the request due to concerns related to vehicular circulation egress/ingress to the building, lack of adequate on- site parking, inconsistency with the General Plan and automobile repair bay screening. The applicant continued the project three times in order to work out a mutually acceptable circulation plan with Carl Karcher Enterprises (adjacent Carl's Jr.) who opposed the development at that time. The case was closed in September 1997 for failure to submit revised plans and payment of fees required for two public hearing continuances. B. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AND RECOMMENDATION: On May 25, 1999 the Planning Commission considered Conditional Use Permit No. 98-89 associated with the development of the Jiffy Lube facility. Four speakers representing the applicant spoke in favor of the project. Six additional members of the public spoke against the project raising concerns relating to project inconsistency with General Plan goals and objectives, land use incompatibility with adjacent residential areas and overconcetration of automotive service uses in the immediate vicinity. Staff recommended denial of the Conditional Use Permit. The Commission discussed concerns that the proposed use will further contribute to the dilapidation of the center and hinder future redevelopment of the existing retail center. It was suggested that the General Plan goals and policies be followed. Some Commissioners felt CD99-52 -4- 07/26/99 5:17 PM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: August 2, 1999 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD99-52 the development proposal was in compliance with the General Plan and with additional conditions of approval would be a viable use for the site. The Planning Commission evaluated additional pertinent project issues and approved the project with conditions requiring landscaping improvements on the shopping center parcels to bring it in conformance with the ZSO. The reason for the upgrade was due to the fact that the majority of the required parking for the Jiffy Lube facility is on the shopping center parcel, there is reciprocal access and parking between all shopping center parcels including the Carl's Jr. parcel, and the Jiffy Lube and shopping center parcels are owned by the same property owner. C. APPEAL: On June 3, 1999, L. C. Smull (project property owner) dba Business Properties Development Company, submitted an appeal of the May 25, 1999, Planning Commission action to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 98-89 with conditions requiring landscape improvements on the shopping center parcels adjoining the Jiffy Lube parcel (ATTACHMENT NO. 5). The cited reasons for appealing the imposed landscaping conditions on the adjoining shopping center parcels are as follows; the Carl's Jr. parcel is owned by a separate entity, the review and scope of conditions for the Jiffy Lube application in relation to the shopping center site should be limited to adequacy of parking and circulation and should exclude landscaping, implementation of Planning Commission's conditions requiring additional landscaping will reduce the amount of parking for the shopping center and thereby adversely limit the allowable uses on the site. On June 4, 1999, Oil Max and Mobil Oil submitted an appeal of the Planning Commission's action (ATTACHMENT NO. 6). The cited reasons for the appeal were; project non- compliance with the General Plan, opposition by adjacent property owners, traffic, overconcentration of automotive service facilities within immediate area, non-pedestrian friendly nature of subject land use, land use inconsistency with development of neighborhood commercial businesses along Adams Avenue. D. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION: The project site is located on the south side of Adams (designated Primary path/ Image corridor/ Landscape corridor) and east of Magnolia Street, (designated secondary path/Image corridor), within a "Commercial Node" /General Plan subarea (8A). According to the General Plan this commercial node, centrally located within the City's Southeast Residential District, is intended to act as a focal point of activity and primarily serve the surrounding residential neighborhood and the greater community. The existing commercial center within which the subject parcel is located, due to its site design, architecture and lack of pedestrian orientation, currently lacks distinctive character and identity and contributes to Adams and Magnolia Avenues' lack of character and clarity of location. CD99-52 -5- 07/26/99 5:17 PM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: August 2, 1999 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD99-52 An analysis of the proposal in terms of its compliance with General Plan (goals, objectives and policies) and applicable Zoning and Subdivision development standards (parking, landscaping, circulation etc.) follows. 1) General Plan— Land Use Compatibility The proposed project is inconsistent with goals and objectives of the City's General Plan and the Land Use Element designation of General Commercial (CG) on the subject property which encourage introduction of a diversity of uses in commercial centers that improve their relationship with the surrounding residential neighborhoods and increase their viability as places of community activity; and siting and design of structures to facilitate and encourage pedestrian activity. Specifically the development plan does not comply with the following General Plan goals, objectives and policies: Goal LU8 Achieve a pattern of land uses that preserves, enhances, and establishes a distinct identity for the City's neighborhoods, corridors and centers. Objective LU8.1 Maintain the pattern of existing land uses while providing opportunities for the evolution, including intensification and re-use, of selected subareas in order to improve their character and identity. Objective LU 10.1 Provide for the continuation of existing and the development of a diversity of retail and service commercial uses that are oriented to the needs of local residents, serve the surrounding region, serve visitors to the City, and capitalize on Huntington Beach's recreational resources. Policy LU 10.1.11 Promote the introduction of a diversity of uses in Commercial General centers, particularly those containing anchor grocery stores that improve their relationship with surrounding residential neighborhoods and increasing their viability as places of community activity. These may encompass such uses as adult or child daycare facilities, community meeting rooms, "neighborhood"restaurants, entertainment, and cultural facilities. Policy LU 10.1.12 Require that Commercial General uses be_designed and developed to achieve a high level of quality, distinctive character, and compatibility with existing uses and development including the consideration of: c. siting and design of structures to facilitate and encourage pedestrian activity, I� CD99-52 -6- 07/26/99 5:17 PM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: August 2, 1999 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD99-52 d. siting of one or more buildings in proximity to the street frontage to convey a visual relationship to the street and sidewalks; Goal UD 1 Enhance the visual image of the City of Huntington Beach Automotive repair ("limited") is a permitted use on the project site, subject to approval of a conditional use permit, provided findings of approval inclusive of project consistency with the General Plan can be made for the subject development. Based on the 1996 General Plan which specifies City goals objectives and policies that advocate re-planning and re-use of areas to establish a distinct identity for City neighborhoods, corridors and centers, and promote pedestrian oriented development proposals, findings for project approval can not be supported by staff. Staffs position is based on the following: The Land Use element of the General Plan identifies as an "issue" the fact that the City contains few well-defined places that are characterized by community activity and a high level of identity. It states that most areas of the City have been developed as automobile- oriented environments that pose a challenge to neighborhood interactions. The Urban Design Element of the General Plan largely attributes lack of character and clarity of location for Path/ Image corridors to the array of strip commercial centers, such as the "Drug Emporium/Carl's Jr." retail center, along primary and secondary paths. Current City land use policies are intended to address the aforementioned issues. The General Plan sets forth "city-wide" as well as "by land use category" goals objectives and policies for future distribution and pattern of development in order to achieve a pattern of land uses that preserves, enhances and establishes a distinct identity for the City's neighborhoods, corridors, and centers (Goal LU 8). It is the City's objective (Objective LU 8.1) to maintain the pattern of existing land uses while providing opportunities for the evolution, including intensification and re-use of selected sub-areas in order to improve their character and identity. General Plan goals, objectives, and policies for General Commercial (CG) land uses encourage introduction of a diversity of uses in commercial centers (LU 10.1, LU 10.1.11,), particularly those containing anchor stores such as grocery and drug stores, to improve their relationship with the surrounding residential neighborhoods and increase their viability as centers of community activity. These include uses such as adult or daycare facilities, community meeting rooms, "neighborhood" restaurants, entertainment, cultural facilities etc. The General Plan advocates design and development policies which encourage siting and design of structures to facilitate and encourage pedestrian activity and siting of building in proximity to the street frontage to convey a visual relationship to the street and sidewalk (LU 10.1.12). I� CD99-52 -7- 07/26/99 5:17 PM I [ qs� I,; = 11�111 Illlt� t 11�� IIf■ \ I I� �\ - ■ �,I I ...m��. i�li � `IIIIII►����I� �Y'���III 1111 Imo . I �1 au■u. llu 11 III � 1 1 1 REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: August 2, 1999 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD99-52 F E E T11q1 Q 1� L C7Q 0 It 7.11 (A)Lack of deAued mas_adze disooaraps p.dac(so access.(8)Primary vier is of partlag ... USUDy 6atf empty.(Q 11nea ameg.mm dm cot meotaap muidpla,happier San-(D)LWUW - WW"to aecaeet to o(RKhommacLL(�Service eta tao a:paalrr.andwtilWA regaita ' Iaedtupe aemmleg.(F)Layout elGoinams my opportunity to connect to adjacent mWeetia(ana. *py�rAr Tamorcrop) - - F F' n QaCI Sketch%13a (A)Def ned meet edge aortas mme dahabla pedestrian mvhoemmt(3)Imanew pawn, i r dom aeptive Impact from meat(Q loetad fbcused arrangement.mate a lrlllage-haling.aaeomegp multiple zbopping paps.(D)Strong cenaeedoo to djjaeent offadcommorcial was(1)Service aros redwood: odmed to dpcmt offleakomrnemia4 lau scrauieg mw�(fl Lay—meounga am by adjacent tdden.. th6 aumieadng cad to acute vta collector road sypm.(�rtay of Ae rolbor croup). . Based on the above information, staff finds the proposed demolition of an existing office/retail structure and its replacement with an automotive repair facility at the subject location contrary with the intent of City goals objectives and policies and planning principles which encourage pedestrian oriented community supporting uses/site design. Furthermore, partial redevelopment of the site would hinder future attempts to comprehensively redevelop the commercial center as a unit thus eliminating or diminishing the negative impact of"strip commercial center" appearance and improving the economic viability of the shopping center and aesthetic quality/character of Adams and Magnolia. CD99-52 -9- 07/26/99 5:01 PM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: August 2, 1999 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD99-52 2) Building Design— Orientation: The ZSO defines vehicle/equipment repair as the "Light repair and sale of goods and services for vehicles, including brakes, muffler, tire shops, oil and lube, and accessory uses, but excluding body and fender shops, upholstery, painting\ and rebuilding, or reconditioning of vehicles." The proposed oil and lube service functions similarly to a service station but without the sale of motor fuel. The applicant indicates that in addition to the oil and lube service, the technicians vacuum vehicles interior, wash windows, check tire pressure, and provide additional services such as changing other vehicle fluids and replacing windshield wipers. These services are often found in full-service service stations which are subject to design standards contained in Section 230.32 of the ZSO. ZSO Section 230.32.D.3 states: "Service bay openings shall be designed to minimize the visual intrusion on surrounding streets and properties. A maximum of 3 service bays shall be permitted per site, none of which shall face a public right-of-way." The proposed building is designed with six (6) overhead doors, three (3) along Adams Avenue and three (3) on the rear of the building facing south towards the front of other businesses in the commercial center. The three door and service bays oriented towards Adams Avenue will be partially screened by a berm/wall/open lattice screen. Staff believes that the proposed design does not meet the intent of the code and City requirements pertaining to full screening/enclosing service areas previously imposed by the Planning Commission on similar businesses within the immediate vicinity such as the Oil Max at 9868 Adams Ave which was approved in 1986. At that location the building is setback considerably from Adams Avenue and the three service bays facing Adams Avenue are fully screened. With regard to the proposed architectural building design, staff believes that although "in a vacuum" the building design and materials are acceptable, in the context established by General Plan goals and objectives and policies, it does not meet the intent for quality planning and design. 3) Parking: The drive-through auto service facility is proposed to be constructed on a parcel which is currently occupied by a freestanding one-story building, formerly used as a real estate office. The subject site and adjoining multi-tenant commercial center are owned by the same entity. The property was developed in conjunction with the commercial center and is subject to common CC&Rs and reciprocal access and parking agreement associated with the shopping center development. CD99-52 -10- 07/26/99 5:17 PM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: August 2, 1999 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD99-52 The subject commercial center was approved in 1973. A total of 353 parking spaces were required for the entire center based on a ratio of one parking space per 200 square feet of commercial area. The developer provided 356 parking spaces. In July of 1996, the Zoning Administrator approved Conditional Use Permit No. 96-38 to allow 10% of the floor area of the entire commercial center to be parked at a warehouse ratio because of the amount of warehousing/storage areas included in the commercial center. This action effectively reduced the parking requirement for the center to 345 parking spaces. The parking requirement for the Jiffy Lube facility (15 parking spaces) is greater than that of the existing retail space (12 parking spaces) which is proposed to be demolished. In addition modifications in the mix/ square footage occupied by shopping center tenants has further changed the number of parking spaces required for the shopping center and parking lot area re-striping is necessary to comply with ZSO parking requirements. The applicant has submitted information on current tenant/use of the center and based on this data it was determined that a total of 359 parking spaces should be provided, inclusive of the 15 parking spaces required for the Jiffy Lube facility, to comply with ZSO parking requirements. It should be noted that the 359 minimum parking requirement takes into account the reduction in parking previously allotted for warehouse/storage areas within the subject commercial center site. The submitted plan depicts 361 parking spaces (296 standard/ 65 compact), however, modification to the proposed parking stall striping across from the commercial center's easterly property line, adjacent to building F, will be necessary to meet minimum parking width requirements. This modification will result in a loss of two parking spaces and reduction of total parking stalls for the commercial center to 359 stalls. Commercial Center CUP.9638Appro►red71! CurrentlVRegu�red � Proposed TenantSpace� Parkingper�parcel- In-line Commercial 309 parking spaces 320 parking spaces 322 parking spaces Center tenant spaces Carl's Jr. 24 parking spaces (20 24 parking spaces 24 parking spaces (20 on subject parcel/4 on subject parcel/4 on adjacent) on adjacent parcel) Existing commercial 12 parking spaces (9 N/A N/A structure to be on subject parcel/ 3 demolished on adjacent center) Jiffy Lube N/A 15 parking spaces 15 parking spaces (1 on subject parcel/ 14 on adjacent parcel) Total Parking 345 parking spaces 359 parking spaces 361 parking spaces (includes 65 compact) CD99-52 -11- 07/26/99 5:17 PM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: August 2, 1999 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD99-52 Carl Karcher Enterprises, INC. has endorsed the proposed commercial center parking modifications. 4) Circulation: Vehicles will enter the building from its southerly side. Stacking for six vehicles has been provided in two rows behind the service bays on the subject parcel. A four ft. wide landscaped planter is proposed to separate vehicular traffic accessing the adjacent drive- through restaurant (Carl's Jr.) and Jiffy Lube patrons. Customer parking would be available across the driveway separating the Jiffy Lube facility from the rest of the commercial center. The applicant projects (Attachment No. 3) that the proposed express lube business would serve between 50-75 customers per weekday and up to 100 customers per weekend day. Vehicles will be driven in /out of the service bays by employees only and the vehicle service process will take a maximum of 5 minutes to complete. The applicant states it would be highly unlikely the proposed six vehicle queuing area will ever be completely occupied at any given time. Even with all service bays occupied and assuming 10% of the total customer traffic generated present within a 5 minute period the queuing area would provide sufficient area to accommodate customer vehicles and keep the shared driveway south of the facility clear of inbound traffic. In addition the applicant anticipates, since most customers call before going to an express lube facility, the operator would be able to schedule arrivals, if necessary, to minimize traffic congestion and customer waiting. Staff believes that although the proposed building/land use siting is not optimum, the applicant has satisfactorily addressed vehicle stacking and sight distance requirements. It is anticipated that the proposed land use would not impact on street traffic patterns/ circulation, however, the nature of the proposed automotive service land use, and inherent circulation pattern associated with it would negatively affect pedestrian use/activity on the commercial center site. In addition, staff wishes to note the possibility of potential vehicle stacking area overflow onto the southerly shared driveway if the aforementioned volume or service performance time projections by the applicant are exceeded. Also, the location of customer parking is undesirable. Those seeking a service estimate will park on the east of the driveway aisle and walk across the driveway to the customer service office. This poses a safety concern. Ideally the driveway should be closed and parking provided adjacent to the building. 5) Landscaping: The submitted plans depict a 16.5 ft. wide landscape planter area along Adams Avenue in front of Jiffy Lube. A two ft. high landscaped berm is proposed in conjunction with a screen wall structure, evergreen flowering vines, shrubs and accent plants within this planter. CD99-52 -12- 07/26/99 5:17 PM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: August 2, 1999 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD99-52 Additional landscaping areas will be provided along the westerly and easterly building walls, and between the Jiffy Lube parcel and the southerly-adjoining portion of the shopping center parking lot. Three existing end-parking isle planters are proposed to be reconfigured/ relocated to accommodate the proposed development plan and existing affected trees are proposed to be relocated as necessary or removed and replaced, in accordance with HBZSO landscaping requirements, with new trees. A total of approximately 2,766 sq. ft. of landscaped area (18.4%) will be provided on the Jiffy Lube site exceeding the minimum applicable 8% landscaped requirement. E. REVISED SUBMITTAL On June 29, 1999 a revised site plan for the subject development proposal with landscaping improvements on the shopping center site to comply with ZSO requirements and Planning Commission conditions of project approval for the Jiffy Lube facility was submitted to the Planning Department (ATTACHMENT NOA). The subject plan provides the necessary landscaping improvements along street frontages and is in compliance with parking ratio and landscaping requirements for the overall site. The project property owner (L.C. Smull - Appellant) has recognized that the revised shopping center site plan complies with the Planning Commission's landscaping improvement conditions and ZSO requirements but does not endorse the plan because it would require relocation of one driveway and restriping of the parking lot area thus, in his opinion, deeming this solution cost prohibitive. Staffs opinion is that the revised site plan is superior to that previously presented by the Jiffy Lube applicant because it provides landscaping in compliance with ZSO requirements for the entire shopping center, accommodates parking stalls adjacent to the Jiffy Lube facility to serve the subject use, improves the Carl's Jr. drive through traffic and adjacent parking circulation. F. SUMMARY Staff is not able to support this project because of fundamental underlying issues related to the type of land use, its location and service bay orientation to a major arterial/ image path/ landscape corridor. Staff finds the proposed development inconsistent with General Plan goals and objectives which encourage distribution of land uses and patterns of development that preserve, enhance and establish a distinct identity for the City's neighborhoods, corridors and centers. In fact staffs opinion is that development of the drive-through auto-service facility will not increase the shopping center's viability as a center of community activity and would hinder its future redevelopment by introducing an automotive service facility at a location which should be developed with a use which would foster pedestrian use. CD99-52 -13- 07/26/99 5:17 PM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: August 2, 1999 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD99-52 Staff recognizes and agrees with the General Plan statement that correcting existing problems, related to fundamental land use patterns, distribution and form of development, will necessitate the recycling and reuse of numerous sites, a process which inherently is much more difficult to achieve than the development of vacant properties due to costs and possible opposition to change. This recycling and reuse process is necessary to improve the quality of life for the citizens of Huntington Beach. Shortsighted or incremental decisions for the development of individual parcels inconsistent with the General Plan's vision for the City would be detrimental in achieving long term General Plan goals. Redevelopment of the subject parcel with a freestanding building and introducing an automotive service facility at the proposed project site will diminish opportunities for comprehensive redevelopment of the center with a pedestrian orientation. The proposed project, by virtue of its location and land use operation, will preclude future opportunities to re-plan the commercial center in a manner that would establish a well defined continuous street edge and would create a desirable pedestrian environment, screen parking, reduce underutilized service areas, encourage public use of space, and visually strengthen the Adams/Magnolia Avenue intersection, thus improving the character and identity of the Magnolia and Adams corridors. Staff recommends denial of the proposal based on noncompliance with the General Plan and HBZSO issues outlined in the analysis section of this report. Environmental Status: The proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to Class 3, Section 15303 of the California Environmental Quality Act which states commercial buildings on sites for such use, if designed for an occupant load of 30 persons or less, if not constructed in conjunction with the building of four or more of such structures, and if not involving the significant use of hazardous substances are exempt from environmental review. CD99-52 -14- 07/26/99 5:17 PM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: August 2, 1999 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD99-52 Attachment(s): City Clerk's NumberPage . Description 1 Findings for Denial (Staff Recommendation) 2 Findings and Conditions of Approval (PC Recommendation) 3 Narrative/Jiffy Lube Development Proposal Exhibits 4 Revised site design proposal dated 6/29/99 5 L.C. Smull Appeal dated 6/3/99 6 Oil Max/ Mobil Appeal dated 6/4/99 with Community Petition in opposition dated 7/21/99 7 Letters in Support 8 Letter in Opposition 9 Planning Commission Minutes for 5/25/99 CD99-52 -15- 07/26/99 5:17 PM ,: ;: ,. C � � ��� __ � �t- .- � � � " - z ATTACHMENT NO. 1 FINDINGS FOR DENIAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 98-89 SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR DENIAL- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 98-89: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 98-89 for the establishment, maintenance and operation of a 4,631 sq. ft. vehicle equipment repair facility and re-striping the commercial center to include 65 compact parking spaces will be detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. The project is inconsistent with goals objectives and policies of the General Plan which encourage distribution of land uses and patterns of development that preserve, enhance and establish a distinct identity for the City's neighborhoods, corridors and centers. It negatively affects pedestrian use/activity on the commercial center. The building design does not meet the General Plan intent of quality planning and design. 2. The conditional use permit will not be compatible with surrounding uses. The project is inconsistent with goals objectives and policies of the General Plan which advocate land use distribution to increase shopping centers' viability as centers of community activity. In addition, the proposed Jiffy Lube facility would hinder future redevelopment of the existing retail center, including its intensification and re-use to improve its character and identity, by introducing an automotive service facility at a location which lends itself to be developed with a pedestrian oriented use/activity. 3. The proposed vehicle equipment repair facility will not comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. The proposal is inconsistent with the intend of HBZSO design standards which encourage minimizing visual intrusion of service bays on surrounding streets and properties and limit the maximum number of service bays to three (3) per site, none of which are permitted to face a public right-of-way. 4. The granting of the conditional use permit will adversely affect the General Plan. Such action will not be consistent the following goals and policies of the General Plan: Goal L U8 Achieve a pattern of land uses that preserves, enhances, and establishes a distinct identity for the City's neighborhoods, corridors and centers. Objective LU8.1 Maintain the pattern of existing land uses while providing opportunities for the evolution, including intensification and re-use, of selected subareas in order to improve their character and identity. (99SR22)—5/25/99 Attachment No. 1.1 Objective L U 10.1 Provide for the continuation of existing and the development of a diversity of retail and service commercial uses that are oriented to the needs of local residents, serve the surrounding region, serve visitors to the City, and capitalize on Huntington Beach's recreational resources. Policy LU 10.1.11 Promote the introduction of a diversity of uses in Commercial General centers,particularly those containing anchor grocery stores that improve their relationship with surrounding residential neighborhoods and increasing their viability as places of community activity. These may encompass such uses as adult or child daycare facilities, community meeting rooms, "neighborhood" restaurants, entertainment, and cultural facilities. Policy LU 10.1.12 Require that Commercial General uses be designed and developed to achieve a high level of quality, distinctive character, and compatibility with existing uses and development including the consideration of e. siting and design of structures to facilitate and encourage pedestrian activity; f. siting of one or more buildings in proximity to the street frontage to convey a visual relationship to the street and sidewalks; Goal UD 1 Enhance the visual image of the City of Huntington Beach The siting and design of the proposed development does not facilitate and encourage pedestrian activity. The land use and siting of the building in proximity to Adams Avenue precludes establishing strong visual and physical linkages between the commercial center and the street/sidewalk. 5. The Planning Commission finds that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment and is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)pursuant to section 15303, Class 3 of the CEQA Guidelines, because the project is designed for an occupant load of 30 persons or less and will not be constructed in conjunction with the building of four or more such structures. (99SR22)—5/25/99 Attachment No. 1.2 �, �_: .. x �: I FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 98-89 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL -CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 98-89: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 98-89 for the establishment,maintenance and operation of a 4,361 sq. ft. vehicle equipment repair facility and re-striping of the commercial center to include 65 compact spaces will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. The project will improve the overall appearance of the intersection and complement the adjacent commercial center. The proposed Jiffy Lube would also act as the impetus for future redevelopment of the existing retail center and will provide an additional service to the residents and a revenue source to the City. 2. The conditional use permit will be compatible with surrounding uses due to the commercial character of the neighboring center and the existing service stations at the Adams and Magnolia Avenue intersection. The proposed service bay screen walls are properly integrated within the building design. 3. The proposed vehicle repair facility will comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and any specific condition required for the proposed use in the district in which it would be located. The project complies with the development standards,parking and landscaping requirements of Chapter 211,231, and 232 respectively. 4. The granting of the conditional use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan. It is consistent with the Land Use Element designation of General Commercial on the subject property. In addition, it is consistent with the following goals and policies of the General Plan: Policy LU 10.1.4 Require that commercial buildings and sites be designed to achieve a high level of architectural and site layout quality. Policy LU 10.1.12 Require that Commercial General uses be designed and developed to achieve a high level of quality, distinctive character, and compatibility with existing uses and development including the consideration of a. incorporation of site landscape,particularly along street frontages and in parking lots; (99CL05254) b. linkage of buildings by common architectural design, landscape and pedestrian systems, to avoid the appearance of independent freestanding structures surrounded by parking; The proposed structure incorporates variable massing and modulation, a gazebo structure and open space trellis screen,providing an interesting fagade along Adams Avenue. The building design incorporates quality architectural treatment on all sides. 5. The Planning Commission finds that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment and is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)pursuant to section 15303, Class 3 of the CEQA Guidelines,because the project is designed for an occupant load of 30 persons or less and will not be constructed in conjunction with the building of four or more such structures. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 98-89: 1. The site plan,floor plans and elevations received and dated March 25, 1999 shall be the conceptually approved layout for the subject parcel and shopping center parcel with the following modifications: a. Elevations shall depict the proposed colors in accordance with the colors and materials palette dated March 25, 1999. b. Parking lot striping detail shall comply with Chapter 231 of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and Title 24, California Administrative Code. (Code Requirement) c. Depict all utility apparatus, such as but not limited to back flow devices and Edison transformers on the site plan. Utility meters shall be screened from view from public rights-of-way. Electric transformers in a required front or street side yard shall be enclosed in subsurface vaults. Backflow prevention devices shall be prohibited in the front yard setback and shall be screened from view. (Code Requirement) d. All exterior mechanical equipment shall be screened from view on all sides. Rooftop mechanical equipment shall be setback 15 feet from the exterior edges of the building. Equipment to be screened includes,but is not limited to,heating, air conditioning, refrigeration equipment,plumbing lines, ductwork and transformers. Said screening shall be architecturally compatible with the building in terms of materials and colors. If screening is not designed specifically into the building, a rooftop mechanical equipment plan showing screening must be submitted for review and approval with the application for building penmit(s). (Code Requirement) e. Depict all gas meters, water meters, electrical panels, air conditioning units,mailbox facilities and similar items on the site plan and elevations. If located on a building,they shall be architecturally designed into the building to appear as part of the building. They shall be architecturally compatible with the building and non-obtrusive, not interfere with sidewalk areas and comply with required setbacks. (99CL0525-5) f. If outdoor lighting is included, energy saving lamps shall be used. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties and shall be shown on the site plan and elevations. g. The parking lot restriping plan for the shopping center parcel (including Carl's Jr.) shall include landscaped areas in accord with Chapter 232 of the Zoning Subdivision Ordinance. Section 232.12,Exceptions of the Zoning Subdivision Ordinance would apply. 2. Prior to issuance of grading permits the following shall be completed: a. The developer shall submit a Landscape Construction Set,prepared by a licensed Landscape Architect,to the Park,Tree and Landscape Division for their approval showing all proposed plantings for the subject parcel and adjacent shopping center. The Landscape Construction Set must be approved by the Departments of Public Works and Planning. The Landscape Construction Set shall include a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State Licensed Landscape Architect which identifies the location,type, size and quantity of all existing plant materials on the subject parcel and adjacent shopping center to remain, existing plant materials to be removed and proposed plant materials; an irrigation plan; a grading plan; an approved site plan and a copy of the entitlement conditions of approval.- The landscape plans shall be in conformance with Chapter 232 of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and applicable Design Guidelines. Any existing mature trees that must be removed shall be replaced at a two to one ratio (2:1)with minimum 36 inch box trees and.shall be incorporated into the project's landscape plan. The rest of the shopping center shall be brought up to the HBZSO landscaping requirements including a minimum 10' wide landscaped planter along Adams Avenue,minimum 6' wide landscaped planter along Magnolia Street, 6%of the site landscaped, one 24"box tree well for every 10 parking spaces. One 36"box tree per 45 feet of linear frontage, and irrigation systems providing 100%coverage. (PW) b. A grading plan,prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. (PW) c. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered engineer. This analysis shall include on-site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendation for grading, chemical and fill properties,retaining walls, streets,and utilities. (PW) d. A"Water Quality Management Plan"shall be prepared in accordance with NPDES requirements by a Civil or Environmental Engineer. (PW) (99CL0525-6) ( - C 3. Prior to submittal for building permits, the following shall be completed: a. Zoning entitlement conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on the cover page of all the working drawing sets used for issuance of building permits (architectural, structural, electrical, mechanical and plumbing). b. All Fire Department requirements per these conditions shall be noted on the building plans. (FD). c. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer and submitted with the building permit application. This analysis shall include on-site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding: grading, foundations, retaining walls, streets,utilities, and chemical and fill properties of underground items including buried pipe and concrete and the protection thereof. (Code Requirement) d. An engineering geologist shall be engaged to submit a report indicating the ground surface acceleration from earth movement for the subject property. All structures within this development shall be constructed in compliance with the g-factors as indicafed by the geologist's report. Calculations for footings and structural members to withstand anticipated g-factors shall be submitted to the City for review prior to the issuance of building permits. (Code Requirement) 4. Prior to issuance of building permits,the following shall be completed: a. Submit copy of the revised site plan,floor plans and elevations pursuant to Condition No. 1 for review and approval and inclusion in the entitlement file to the Planning Department. b. A grading permit shall be issued. (PW) c. All Public Works fees shall be paid. (PW-Code Requirements) d. Floors shall be designed to drain to an approved oil separator or trap discharging to sewers.n accordance with the Plumbing Code per UBC 311.2.3.1. (BD) e. Automatic sprinkler systems shall be installed in the basement area per Uniform Building Code Section 904.2.2 and the Huntington Beach Fire Code Section 1003.2.2. Shop drawings shall be submitted and approved by the Fire Department prior to system installation. (FD) (99CL0525-7) f. A fire alarm system will be installed to comply with Huntington Beach Fire Department and Uniform Fire Code Standards. Shop drawings will be submitted to and approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. The system will provide the following: (FD) 1) Water flow,valve tamper and trouble detection 2) Audible alarms 3) Smoke detectors g. Fire extinguishers will be installed and located in areas to comply with Huntington Beach Fire Code Standards. (FD) h. Fire lanes will be designated and posted to comply with City Specification No. 415. (FD) i. Address numbers will be installed to comply with City Specification No. 428. The size of the numbers will be sized a minimum of six(6)inches with a brush stroke of one and one-half (1-1/2) inches. (FD) j. Installation and/or removal of underground flammables or combustible liquid storage tanks shall comply with the Orange County Environmental Health and Huntington Beach Fire Department requirements. (FD) k. The subject property shall provide an irrevocable offer to dedicate reciprocal driveway and parking easement(s)between the subject site and adjacent service station property to the west. The legal instrument shall be submitted to the Planning Department a minimum of 60 days prior to building permit issuance. The document shall be approved by the Planning Department and the City Attorney as to form and content and,when approved, shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder. A copy of the recorded document shall be filed with the Planning Department. (Code Requirement) 1. An interim parking and/or building materials storage plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department to assure adequate parking and restroom facilities are available for employees, customers and contractors during the projects construction phase and that adjacent properties will not be impacted by their location. The applicant shall obtain any necessary encroachment permits from the Department of Public Works. m. Submit a letter of map revision from FEMA declaring the lot(s) exempt from floodplain requirements or submit a copy of completed FEMA Elevation Certificate(s)to the Planning Department. 5. During construction,the applicant shall: a. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems in all areas where vehicles travel to keep damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site: (99CL0525-8) b. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day; c. Use low sulfur fuel(.05%)by weight for construction equipment; d. Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days (first stage smog alerts); e. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts. 6. Prior to occupancy and commencement of use,the following shall be completed: a. The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District and submit a copy to Planning Department. b. The parking lot shall be restriped and landscaping installed on the commercial shopping center parcel so that it conforms to provisions of Chapter 231 and 232 of the Huntington Beach Zoning& Subdivision Ordinance per Conditions l.g. and 2.a..herein. c. The existing water service serving the site may potentially be utilized for irrigation purposes if it is of adequate size, conforms to current standards, and is in working condition as determined by the.Water Division. The existing water meter must be replaced with a touch-read meter,and a new conforming back flow protection devices must be installed on the domestic and irrigation water systems. (PW ) d. The proposed building shall have a separate fire service and backflow protection device. (PW e. All improvements to the property shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans and conditions of approval specified herein, including: (PW ) 1) The bus zone curb on Adams Avenue,along the frontage of the subject property, shall be re-painted red; 2) The existing driveway on Adams Avenue shall be removed and replaced with a radius driveway per Standard Plan No.211; 3) The Traffic Impact Fee shall be paid prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy; 4) The site shall drain through a clarifier and filter system,then to the street; 5) A 6"VCP sewer lateral shall be required f. Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein shall be accomplished and verified by the Planning Department. g. All building spoils,such as unusable lumber,wire,pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. (99CL0525-9) h. If the lot is not considered exempt by FEMA, a second elevation certificate shall be submitted to the Planning Department for the project"as built." 7. The use shall comply with the following: a. There shall be no outside storage of vehicles,vehicle parts, equipment or trailers. c. All repair work shall be conducted wholly within the building; no servicing of vehicles outside of the building. d. Hours of operation shall be limited to between 7:00am—8:00pm(Monday through Sunday). e. Only the uses described in the narrative attached to the May 25, 1999 Planning Commission Staff Report shall be permitted. f. No vehicles shall encroach into the 24 ft. wide reciprocal access to the adjacent service station. 8. The Planning Director ensures that all conditions of approval herein are complied with. The Planning Director shall be notified in writing if any changes to the site plan,elevations and floor plans are proposed as a result of the plan check process. Building permits shall not be issued until the Planning Director has reviewed and approved the proposed changes for conformance with the intent of the Planning Commission's action and the conditions herein. If the proposed changes are of a substantial nature, an amendment to the original entitlement reviewed by the Planning Commission may be required pursuant to the HBZSO. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REOUIREMENTS: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 98-89 shall not become effective until the ten-day appeal period has elapsed. 2. Conditional Use Permit No. 98-89 shall become null and void unless exercised within one year of the date of final approval or such extension of time as may be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. 3. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Conditional Use Permit No. 98-89, pursuant to a public hearing for revocation, if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance or Municipal Code occurs. 4.. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid. (PV ) 5. Traffic Impact Fees shall be paid at the time of final inspection or issuance of a Certificate - of Occupancy. (PV ) (99CL0525-10) 6. An encroachment permit shall be required for all work within the right-of-way. (PV ) 7. A Certificate of Occupancy must be issued by the Planning Department prior to occupying the building. 8. State-mandated school impact fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. 9. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, Building Department, and Fire Department as well as applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards,except as noted herein. 10. Construction shall be limited to Monday- Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. 11. All signs shall conform to applicable Planned Sign Program for the retail center. Prior to installing any new signs, or changing sign faces, a building permit shall be obtained from the Planning Department. 12.The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of$38.00 for the posting of the Notice of Exemption at the County of Orange Clerk's Office. The check shall be made out to the County of Orange and submitted to the Planning Department within two (2)days of the Planning Commission's action. (99CL0525-11) 7 m S» - ,�» y �< \ �, � � � o r r ®_ KHR ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS/ARCHITECTSlPLANNERS r ` r February 12, 1999 f f.f f f C r C -- Amy Wolfe City of Huntington Beach Planning Department 2000 Main Street s Huntington Beach, CA 92648 SUBJECT: Revised Narrative for Conditional Use Permit No. 96-58 Jiffy Lube The project site is located at 9032 Adams Avenue and is a part of an existing shopping center. The site currently contains a 2,500 SF frame and stucco building that has been vacant since February of 1995. .The proposed project would entail demolition of the existing building and replacement with new construction of a lube facility. The lube facility will contain a cashiers service desk, a small waiting area, and restrooms, In addition,an exterior gazebo has been designed for customers who wish to wait outside. The project's land use zoning designation is Commercial General (CG) which allows for automobile services with a Use Permit. The project architecture, building materials, colors and site plan are designed to complement the existing shopping center and the proposed use. The proposed project js designed under the Huntington Beach Zoning Ordinance Zone CG development standards, and has lot coverage of 13%. Per an October 2, 1998 letter from Amy Wolfe, this site is designated in the General Plan Sub- area map as Community' Commercial. Ms. Wolfe's letter referred to the Community Development Chapter of the Land Use Element in regard to site development requirements. The goal (LU 10) of Commercial Districts and Corridors is to "achieve the development of a range of commercial uses", and the objective (LU 10.1) is to "provide for the continuation of existing and the development of a diversity of retail and service commercial uses that are oriented to the needs of local residents,"and"serve the surrounding region". Per a Staff Report by Susan Pierce dated November 12, 1996, the project is consistent with the goals and objectives 'of the General Plan's Land Use Element Commercial General designation and complies with the CG General Commercial requirements of that zone. It is our understanding that the project has been previously denied because the use is not pedestrian friendly. As the specific use of this building will not be attracting pedestrians, this is not seen to be art issue. '..The balance of the center is very pedestrian friendly, and this particular building is well separated from pedestrian uses. However, to better accommodate any pedestrian traffic, access has been provided to the project via sidewalks to both the front and the adjacent parcel through the gazebo. This project either meets or exceeds every development standard set for zone requirements. The staff objection'to the orientation of the building has been addressed by the addition of a trellis structure as an integral part of the landscape plan. This structure, in addition to a 2' landscape berm, will act as a support for flowering evergreen vines that will visually screen the _ service bay doors from Adams Avenue. 2355 Main Street -Suite 120 (949)756-6440 . Irvine,California 92614 ' Fax(949)756-6444 Amy Wolfe February 11, 1999 Page#2 i The proposed second story is proposed to be 31'-8" high. Development standards for this project set the maximum building height at 50'. The Fr000sed design Js wel; within the allowable height. The existing shopping center roof heights ar(- 20' h1Lh. Tne height element has been added to'create a more interesting architectural design. We have taken great care to incorporate the elements of the existing cuter intd tFie proposed. architectural elevations. These elevations will accent the adjacent roof li es witb"tie use of a hip roof element without actually mimicing the design. We are also proposing the use of stone veneer and stucco on the exterior. We feel that the propose_d building greatly complements s the existing center in both use and design. Tqe staff concern of possible circulation conflict with the drive-through traffic will not occur because of the way the site circulation is designed. All customers leaving the Carl's Jr. to the east will use the drive aisle immediately in front of the shopping center buildings until they reach the aisle to the exit driveway. There are only ten parking spaces in the center's_ parking - lot that may, because of their northward orientation, create any potential for exiting through the driveway adjacent to the proposed Jiffy Lube project. The drive aisle at this access is currently designed at 28' minimum; and expands to 32'-35' at the turn radius to allow a maximum of flexibility. The odds of all ten cars exiting through the proposed project drive aisle atone time, which would be the;only way to create a potential conflict, are highly improbable. In general, the express tube business has proven to be an extremely low generator of traffic. Statistics show that even the most successful express lube facilities generate between 50 and 75 customers per day in 3-bay facilities capable of servicing 8 vehicles (2 per bay in tandem) at any given time.Weekend counts are generally higher, but rarely approach 100 per weekend day. Operationally, during non-peak hours of business, a service writer is available to greet customers as they drive up to the entrance queuing area. Since the services offered at an express lube are .limited (i.e., fluid and filter changes only, no repair), and since most customers know what services they want (e.g. oil change), the service writer is able to immediately fill out the necessary forms and direct the customer to the cashier inside the building. This process takes a maximum of five minutes to complete. Once inside, services are paid for immediately, and the customer is then free to wait for service to be completed. It should be noted that, once information on a customer is entered into the operator's computer system, any subsequent service visits are automatically entered .by simply coding In the vehicle license pla±e number - thereby speeding up customer service in the queuing area. Vehicles are driven into and out of the service bays by employees only. By OSHA law, and from a liability point of view, customers are not allowed in the.service bays. Due to the low number of customers generated per day by express lube facilities, it is highly unlikely that the queuing araa will ever by completely.occupied at any given time. Even with all service bays occupied, and if 10% of the total customer traffic generated showed up all at once within a 5 minute period, a six vehicle queuing area would provide sufficient capacity to keep the shared driveway completely clear of inbound customer traffic. Furthermore, since most customers call before going to an express tube facility, the operator is able to schedule arrivals, if necessary. By the very competitive nature of the business, where quick service is critical to building repeat customers, it is not in the interest of the operator to make customers wait too long for service. Therefore, if queuing became a problem, the operator can simply notify customers that service is provided by appointment only. s t Amy Woife (^l February 11, 1999 , Page#3 The project will be incorporated into an existing shopping center with,&;rec14,-oca,..parking agreement in place. The center has a parking requirement,for 30 parking spaces. "There are 375 spaces provided. The project will corpply with conditions and limitations reflecting the,prese-rvation of the public health, safety and Welfare of persons residing or working in or,acja:ent td the ne ghborhood and will not be detrimental to properties or improvements initha vicirit)' or Uithe general welfare of the City of Huntington Beach. Likewise, the proposed use will not adversely impact, nor be adversely impacted by nearby properties in relation to traffic, parking, noise, vibration, s odors, security, aesthetics, or public service capacity and facilities. Pyrsuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code,the project site is not Iocatec,within a Hazardous Waste and Substance site. If there are any questions. or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me..at your convenience. Sincerely yours, KHR Associates . s Tamara Schippers Project Manager- Development Services TSS ; cc: Christian Fanticola;Jiffy Lube Jiffy Lube-Huntington Beach Narrative 2doc GQ7IN1/ACL'N.AmWtl. . aw JG7fi 640DHE OIL SELYLE 5rffw ' f71T.fL1PifNl Adams Avenue P1 IL C- ry1t0fR -htl?IfIt-R+t . .,_..._..,,. C � Ll sU i Y b WF Oze O !")f/£/Y11E 6fAfJ `........a .. .. / f Y 01 �! x•0a9a+aau 8 --- — t m h n 0 3- T W tj .9 D: r.nil. • y.9' rt.dar:o.41o•r. ' �. R S 1'•.3o. 30' •11..J:u.'..0 M4 C � � BI(�8 I- • o it G5' LtOVA s5, 5 Q�HER/DEYELOPEg E W&D + . . � terl■era 9rop4rUts �• I76]I.fltc6 6t. F Irr1--,Ca. 91627.9596 1 •I• _ P (949)474•8900 EXISTING CHURCH FACILITY .......... ................... .......................... ....... ........... ............................ ....... :.;................................... ... ..... PROJECT INFORMATION SUBJECT CODE PROWME12 a if AR OADh�'NI 'VIIII'M 33-A Ill,i WE DMOM in IF M'11%IIIA,3INM;ups"MA A ............................................................................................. MM �CDMOSMOM III=()IIIISGIIII MUSE ........................................................ �EIlIIM alto rMQ mug=MM 1 151-91-2) LOSE RFACIES &VAANWt X 9UMbWQ ARE .... ..... ... . .... .. .. ............ k WE IMM FIS FLOCIO L3253 a FL IAW if.(M w ILI=vi M :C UW: a m-m om nn.Q Mu am .MM ACK rAM It 11d roar o6wo %w am VIM U.(M IF LM-4 24 6POMDM IF MrMISS 0.VIM no J usm L"low.-MlIc"r WW.14YUPIM IF. 3.1"xIj 12 31 CICCWA am-w" /175 U.CM 6 I=U4 I DItcIIIIx V.U.a.®ml cum vi A, UK fACLOT 54 4=1 vo lim W. loin VAM vim" M? WIM�pWqFI) Al PATIO AIWA MY It =.Mf a It.IV(I M DIIR wx Mun tual(AM" 140M Aim OMM TIMM M M 0 V.IT W JM ros-YS VAO NOr A TARTqM'NTMM TRO SIALL K RMWATED colro Frolm Is ar rRomr 0 RDIM AN 1MAMM MAU U. WIWI I.W. IMW M"ITI KIWM FUM 10 rul ;ui w —11AIII)-M. WA 4 Li Li LANWAM Mll 9cppmc Comm �.0 IF I'Mu ISAW U. 01= Sw—1341,w IAA PWIM IjW S.F. rwkw ((DE iny ILK PARm f 00 YA- 7. .......... ........................................ ...... "n"M M CONCEPT SECTION (ADAMS AVENUE FRONTAGE) ........... PRELIMINARYSIM FLAN ICI-M AMM=ATOR C... GVfffiWMCWMCTL?iAWMS JIFFY"BE am 1=Ift IM koI,C40wok SM14 AVAM AMACA446ACLIA STPULM rM(PC M-9444 MNMBrON HEA&C CAUP004A MT L01YJKM ,ae nro'an ■ro�esAN new wne,a�nem■twar on To o�rawmvm mz CO,& I6 ■Gq!An ■ ■uw m u. n.A■+ru ni■is n+■ .mVAIW or. IfineM W ee■.f1M •. EB le ® 11■I!YtJme �p ■ m�0®aw@a SOUTH ELEVAT/ON HEST ELEVATION RATcw mww TllldT,ln Ow ht OGTA■LVNL(deIYI try eearAewr.owerAiev aT avi ro xr �' oTalrosn xr nvr yw ,wwrne wras� nnseae Awu wne y y, ecawwanl■v■e reoue new r■■eri ■ros came eTrse ® ® A�faA/s AM YY ® ernes/me raAmm �re■er.miwe era nmae ,erermaAau ,;..�::-;.c::.£`.:,4.i?:i;�x :c`.:.i:<...t';;;,:ici;e"'is �• �#i� ••`• owe arAn A■.'oe�Au+a asp. raw amc nuie reme -e pne■n w .%ds ws, wn,mre■o em rA■w EAST ELEVAT/ON NORTH ELEVATION >m IA..M 81M MrAM onern■rw+swo �..A■'m s,oe■.Tame Of100i11 re.v+ae.nr eemnr Aw r■are r.rex 16■MANI/VfM smwvvim ■v vnme ,..., MbTf.ernLnIMs reistms ARE AS MPAURM FROM TRELLIS ELEVATION Tic mom*Fomr op ne . CMB ALOMS TW PRLW f PROPERTY LUG TRASH ENCLOSURE �—� EXTERIOR Z ATIOw 1GL6 W.Ib' o �• r r ea' \�\KFl4 A�OOAYEt9 9ULE.12`.I�O' =O 2-L!b ni e+n■nn■m14 AWAA6 AVE MPA44dA M_IA 971�f peq Ti■110 T.(IYj M-ow ftofrfmsTm<rAGI GAL/!'Q0�7A 07/23/1999 09:03 949-756-6444 KHR ASSOCIATES PAGE 02/02 Im fill V 74 q $ a �a i a 0 R MAIM � Z D 4 , 000 O A41rm O ae'VVd 4rrkz enaear CAM ,•vw v p p o 0 "o p p 'Darr SECOND FLOOR PLAN BASEMENT PLAN FLOOR PLAN • W u CUM KHR ABBOCIATOO fLooR PL,41V8 CONmme WQa I/UOVICTa/""m .6Rv uee % E,kvIllo• 3m �fi,s ►`a Mq M-µ• mnr mt• K lIA Alm ADMlS 1a.NRNf7'ON�iYI(GAL/FiC1@4A E !!Hl7CT/EIMQWE3t. KIM M14 ADAMS AVENUE II moos wIL¢vnes 01WRIAPPLICANT a.;; PROJECT WORMATION AM lw1 216" 4 NO -t> 0 o o 151-1.1-w UNOCAL SERVICE STATION ..—I: — RETAIL STORES 444 2 I—off CT (D 0 P L w"51,531 Im ct�------- Lm COW Hk ARM c=m M=) V.«llmlz 7 1P.u.Is.«Le»v.) 24 ns CARLS JR. —110 Ec i 2" 3 usm DFFCE.PRDFE� 1/25Q Sr.(M 3.1a U.) 12 -L7—w 1/1.Sr.(M 110Z V.) 3j b 4 0 4 ° °> 4 b 4 o b 4 o b 4 0 o b 4 '„�„o; b 4 0 o b 4 RETAIL STORES 2 lb I H I ;Ion p I I Imm.1 11 1 Ion I I I I III 141H, MITI I I I@n I I I I I lol— Xl� pmm. WMS 14' W swam o 7wx i4 ;1 RI 3 pp 1«IL WI KBE Gm� RETAIL STORES MMPAU —e-rqm�.n— RETAIL SIDRES 241' I DEVELoPUM W-v. 74"v. BANK m w SCT&� FRWt ID FEET DRUG EMPORIUM w F-1 wmlnc somm mix H i k-1 I Iol 17.132 Sy,(.2* (a«I&lw sF) o aF. Tw ® o e• �• eo .r-. 'k- oEM KHR A880CIATE0 PARKIN&LOT IMPROVEMENTS C—OHUL-Tm PROPERTlEr, It gm" 1-AIA STREEr/ACW45 AVEME (949)75"W re.(C4691) HA71h5WN BEACH-CAL/rc-4ZN/A � a�` �.ems_ � --� =isa BUSINESS PROPERTIES DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 17631 FITCH • P.O.BOX 19586 = IRVINE,CALIFORNIA 92623-9586 -D (714)474-8900 FAX(714)474-8936 - C7 June 2, 1999 �4 �1 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attention: City Clerk Re: C.U.P. 98-89 Jiffy Lube 9032 Adams Avenue Honorable Mayor and City Council: The Planning Commission, in its approval action for Jiffy Lube C.U.P. 98-89 on Tuesday, May 25, 1999, added as a condition of approval that the "adjacent commercial property" be brought up to "current" standards on landscaping. As the owner of the land on which Jiffy Lube filed the subject C.U.P. 98-89 and owner of a portion of the adjacent commercial property in accordance with Chapter 248 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Section 248.20, we appeal the condition above mentioned for the following reasons: 1. The "adjacent commercial property" is not entirely owned by us and we have no control of compliance with such condition by the owner of the Carl's Jr. property. 2. The "adjacent commercial property" was developed prior to June 7, 1983. Section 232.08 Al. requires 8% of the total net site area to be landscaped and Section 232.08 Cl. requires a 10 foot wide landscaped strip adjacent to street. However, Section 232.2 Exceptions requires 6% and a 6 foot wide planter for property built prior to June 7, 1983. The condition is therefore, ambiguous. A clarification of the condition by the Commission has been requested through PHOENIX OFFICE 8024 NORTH 24TH AVENUE, SUITE 310, PHOENIX,ARIZONA 85021 • (602)995-0113 •FAX(602)995-0809 ' � 4 City of Huntington Beach June 2, 1999 Page 2 the Staff Planner but no reply has been given. A copy of this request is attached. 3. The adjacent commercial property was included in the application by the requirement of the Planning Department due to the cross easement and parking contained in the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions of record on the two properties. The scope of the.review and conditions on the Jiffy Lube application should be limited to adequacy of parking and vehicular circulation as to the adjacent commercial property. 4. Enforcement of this condition would reduce the number of parking stalls on the adjacent commercial property and thereby adversely limit the uses allowable or force the owner to apply for a reduction of required parking under Section 231.06 Joint Use Parking or Section 231.08 Reduced Parking for Certain Uses of the City of Huntington Beach Zoning and Zoning Ordinance and thereby be subject to additional public hearings and conditions. For the above reasons we respectfully appeal the condition of approval requiring the adjacent property (including that not owned by us) be brought up to current standards. Sincerely, BUS SS O RTIES �`' v � WG►.�� �-s y4�tv��•a1j rig f-�d—' L. G. Sm , Trustee of the Smull Family Trust ` r RECEIVED CITY CLERK CITY OF HUNTINGTO"si 31EACH, Cry c4 • Ga j y G �-� 19q9 JUG -u P i= 2 0 / Up A9_1 co f�4 • lm 4 p V4 � l� '�'C, c, f �•� wee (� to P d!�A-� 'L°�-�'7 ' p' P-S c` s2 l Al �-- 1)"� ch-fi���� o-✓1 e�Zy� / .. c cc"16 .I ■ ' �\IIn111111 111■1■■111■ICI, �IIIn11■:� ���� �■1 11111:1■11111� .i a as �- � - . ..;..•.. .. ... a :� a• a =� ■■ I■11 .■■■ as � . ■ : ��.11111■�1�11 � IM WS ..: .� as ■III 111■11 111 1■1■1 IINIn 11■m-I r�Ii1 IIIii1■ .a .. .. ■■11�1 ■11��1111, �■IIIIIn11 1�■11■ ��nnn11■ - .�WIINIInn■ _ .111■I _� � INIMM son 111 � 9 a .. -■ I .�� ■I■11\�� ..•�� as a� - ■■■ �". - .. . z 11■11■n■IIn .I��/��� ■■■■■■� I■1■■■11■111■�: �►I■■1■■1■1■111■■■►� •��■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■=- �■I■1 �_•�� NII■1111 11111111�/� 1 .:_. ■■■■■■ ��:riI 11■I■ as ■■■'9l1■ -�: ■■■ 11� C2 . \'N 11111111m ��- / .. p ■■I� a. III■11■III� q'������ i•'= �� I I �� �11 'II�r �'�_' ■i■■ 1 �= . ■1 11111111��1� I ■■■ii���ir ii" III milliMb IS �. .. .� III■■ . ■III■I■1.,_ _. "_ :N■���...■■ _ '� I 11 • a� a ■■► NI■IIn■■n■■ a���_a ■ dig PLANNING ZONING DM 6Z SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 6-6 - 10 • NOTE ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET CITY OF ADOPTED AUGUST I$,I$BD ANY ZONE ADJOINING ANY RIGHT OF WAY IS INTENDED TO EXTEND TO THE CENTER CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 78$ OF RIGHT OF WAY LEGGEE ND N OQ QUALIFIED CLASSIFICATION 4MENDEU ON N0. AMENDED C ORO_ND pOp OFFICE PROFESSIONAL DISTRICT 5-21-62 240 903 5-20-M 68-8 1412 HUNTINGTON BEACH 4-6-fit 256 9E ]-IS-fiB 68-19 1428 L9 HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 0-1-62 268 929 B-4-69 69-11 1514 -.9-62 2]]280 936 -TI 'IO-6 1621 LOW DENSITY RESOENTML DISTRICT -]-63 2 4 " 9-]-]I -1. Ifi5] R3 MEDNM-X1GX pEN51TY RESIDEMi4L 019T111CT -83 309.311 95B 9_1-T2 )0-Z 1637 C2 COMMUNITY BUSINESS IESIMNT 5-20-63 321 966 8-6-]3 73-11 1861 9-19-fi3 345 996 6-4-84 83..0 2696 R2 NZ""DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT 0-)-63 .6 TOOT -1)-83 FLOOD ZONE 2609 ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA 6- 64 393 1060 1.Z..1 95 2854 ® MOBILLNTIAE DISTRICT DISTRICT 6-9 42T 1060 -21-8G B6.1T 2854 ® NOBILENOME DI$TRILT .� 8-19-64 q5] 1019 10-5-SI7 BT-I 2906 COMMUNITY FACILITIES(ECUCATION1 2.15 92 OG )-29-91 90-19 3120 DISTRICT NSTq 2-1]-65 432 122 ® COWJUNIT1 FACILITIES(RECREATIONAL)DISTRICT E115T91CT 3-15-BS 4S2 .082 2-21-fib SII 1146 Q LDMMIINITI FAC1L1)1E5(CIVIC)CISTPICT 2_11-fifi 6-2S44 1:B7 ]-IB-fifi fi6-2] 1228 .__= DESICN4TE5 PRIVATE STREETS 10-3-66 66-42 125) — SETBACK LINE -3-6] 66-59 1218 P2 FLOCOPLAIN DISTRICT 2-fi-6] fifi-58 �2T] WITHIN FLOOD ZONE-FP2 36 31 9�B 6) 6]22 349 1 6 1 4-1-fiB fi8-3 1400 O 6 5 .1 GARFIELD• / AVE. CITY— - - OF HUNTINGTON — RI K 20182 H 1•a Na a RI _ BL'JEN1H RI RA - SHERRY CR U U N LL LL f 3 ALBACORE DR Z y RI C Z RI RI RI RI 0 RI 3R1 ^v D j m _ po --� WILLXELM CR 4,1 N 1O BASS DR. Y RI LL N F V _ MH RI g - � �r I R 3 &LITCHFIELD DR. E R I R I RI C2 NEATNERTEN CR I 3J1>WJ 0' rj 69.E J G. Z RI x RI 3 - s i RI - w VELARDO R. VELARDO ~ DR. HYDE rnRK a DR I R I R I I c I 0- C. F. c. D '6 --- ------- R 1 :W 1060 L. RI I� L7 Y1260 / I KREPP DR. J - FLOUNDER RA �LLJII DR. i J Y = _ IW w� RI -E C F RONNEY DR POLLACK DR I� • H.GgP.6K GR m PI' " mRl PI RI RI RI RI RI RI m MH (RI) I EFIE-11 SAILFISH DR.R' R I �eaA6„nM DI iTARPON DR. R! _ RI LL w G 8 � RI RI RI - RI : RI C4 ANNIK DR GRAND ' DR. 3 �1 F RI FAIR nc cq _ RI P! s RI m YORKTOWN AVE. RI o RI_ I RI VERONICA S, DR. GREENWICH DR. -ELAFIE:1 La ^ m FaEOERICK UI RI I RI RIB RI RI g RI P'. ✓/ "1 RI WARFIELO O DR. U I .PORTSMOUTH DR. CH I MOORE CR T.-R NNSEnU"4RI WIx CF—E RI RI RI RI _ RI 0' NANTUCKET DRBOND CR I �6 P. CF-R x. (Bi1GiI.wRi:scl-Dc::.; d RI W. - RI I RI (Ru l - CONSTITUTION OR. MADELiNE DR. ,� HYANNIS PORT DR. WARBURTON DR ERI- R13 s RI cFc RI 3 RI CAPE COD DR. TELHAN DR 9O. GAR TT "OJ RI RI D NORTH LINE SE I/4 I/4 SEC.6-6-.0 F CF-E �� p _ Rz �; LE S BICKLEY DR. : I R3 I R3 J R3 R3 I R3 R3 J (',•::..:.i.!i4Y G.. 'ri.) GROTON DR_ "• J L J Z (RIl 4(RI) ..... L, J R2 'w « I gxEN U, X 3 GAbRGGE Lx Q PETTS'x00D Da. R3 rINENTAL � PIONEER DR. c4MM1EXt Lx w 32G1 TO qRz 3 NG6WDm RI RI RI RI RI RI R3 R3 R3 R3' R3 R3 R3 �R3 R3 KR3rR3 GETTY$BLRYG DR. RI 09 ' LOOM ".LINE LOT91 TN44931 RI o f W w zD c vrcFFCL�-Y�i R3 I > 1 O Cx _ !1OO �L/� a CRAW FORD CR. W LI u�i W M R3 R3 fl3 =R3 'R3 m �./'T W I �' R3 a'op I H o > > „� � MI Ro99 DR C 2 ,QP:N 0 i S i KEN NG.GN R3 Gq R3 o ----- ---- - R3ON L. ---'--- ADAMS AVE. 6 5 12 ) ) 8 �i July 20, 1999 Honorable Mayor and City Council 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 Re: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 98-89 Dear Sirs, On June 4th, 1999 the City Clerk of Huntington Beach received an Appeal Notice regarding the Planning Commissions decision for the above mentioned (Jiffy Lube) Conditional Use Permit NO. 98-89. The attached items are in support of the appeal filed on June 4th, 1999. We urge you to carefully review these items. We are confident that you will vote against the Conditional Use Permit based on maintaining adherence to all of the principles outlined in the General Plan. Thank You for your continued efforts to maintain the high standards that Huntington Beach is known.for. Sincerely, Mr. Hal Tucker Owner OilMax Ten Minute Lube/Wash 9862 Adams Avenue Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 ATTACHMENTS: 1)Denial Findings 2)Petitions 3)Article concerning parking spaces 4)Article concerning Huntington Beach traffic Denial Windings On May 25, 1999 the City of Huntington Beach received a Staff Report from the Planning Department regarding the Conditional Use permit No. 98-89 (Jiffy Lube/Adams & Magnolia). In this report, the staff strongly recommended against this proposal based on several legal qualifications, which are not in compliance with the General Plan for the City of Huntington Beach. As a result of our research and the Staff Report, we strongly urge the City Council of Huntington Beach to reject the proposed project. We respectfully request the Council to adhere to the guidelines set forth in prior commercial development proposals regarding established planning practices and deny the Conditional Use Permit as proposed. The summation of our research and that of the staff report clearly focuses on those items that are inconsistent with the General Plan. They are as follows: 1.) The project does not comply with the city's goals, objectives and policies as it strictly pertains to the General Plan which encourages land uses to enhance community centers, neighborhoods and corridors regarding General Commercial use. 2.) The project does not comply with land uses and patterns of development for the City's General Plan and urban design goals. 3.) The project does not enhance the land use of the shopping center nor does it increase the centers viability as a place for community activity as it pertains to the General Plan. 4.) The project does not facilitate nor encourage pedestrian use. In fact,the higher volume of vehicle traffic entering and exiting the proposed facility could cause potential harm to pedestrians. It will also inhibit the accessibility to the center by foot traffic. 5.) The project does not meet the General Plan of quality planning and design with compliance to building standards currently in use for the existing shopping center and its facilities. 6.) The project does not lend itself as a positive addition to the community when it puts local residents and its pedestrians in competition with"right- of-way"use with larger volumes of vehicle traffic ranging from compacts to large trucks. Page 2 of 2 Denial Findings 7.) The project does not fulfill a community nor residential"need". 8.) The project does not lend itself to sound business practices when applied to all the principles of the General Plan. In fact, three of the four major US oil companies on the corner of Adams and Magnolia have failed in their attempts to operate a lube%oil business forcing them into operating "gas/convenience store"types of facilities. Only one remains after years of competition--Mobil. This is a strong indication that another such facility is not warranted,particularly in this area. 9.) The project does not comply with the General Plan regarding parking and pedestrian use/activity in a commercial center. The proposed facility will mandate redesign of the parking area. The proposed replacement of "compact parking"is not in compliance with other standards required by other commercial centers. By allowing excessive"compact"parking spaces in lieu of"standard" size parking spaces sets an inappropriate precedent and negates those who previously had to comply with the General Plan. Previous projects coming into our community have had to comply in strict accordance with parking requirements. 10.) The project does not meet with the intent of HBZSO design standards which encourage min• i�ng visual intrusion of service bays of any kind on surrounding streets and properties. 11.) The project does not meet the three (3)bay per site requirement when the design purely indicates bays will be in length sufficient to handle not one car per bay but two (2)cars per bay in automotive industry language known as"piggyback bays". This is usually done with the intent of dealing with high volumes of business and traffic. 12.) The project does not meet the HBZSO design standards when any of the service bays face a public right-of-way(Adams Avenue)regardless of whether there is a barrier such as a hedge or even a large amount of lattice work. Even a large frontage wall to hide the open bays is not in compliance with the General Commercial concept of enhancing the center. In fact, it will serve to visually block some of the center's retail outlets. rJMMUN!'rt PErM uh We acknowledge by signature that we oppose the plan and concept of allowing another automobile lube center, known as Jiffy Lube, to open in our immediate area. The area of concern is at the corner of Adams Avenue and Magnolia-- Avenue. Our local area has far too many similar facilities and does. not need another. Therefore, we the residents, ratepayers. and local business owners of Huntington Beach formally request the Council'to reject this proposed business entity on August 2, 1999. Business/Organization/Resident Address 9"401 G city State ZIP Your ame (ple in IAI- Phone (optional) :4' e d Signat comme W A Business/Organization/Resident Name Dn in r\c, C _ A h A-e r s U'�" Address City, n State C_ ZIP 4)-6 4 8 Your Name (please print) ]jann,N Phone (optional) Signature comments Ly\t .*Business/Organization/Resident Name ���-- -�G�r✓lG� Address t1) . City, 4,8 State eA ZIP c! Your.Name ( se print) M 12 L/I !4�(Z D 1/ Phone (optional) Signatur —" e. � — Comments i Business/Organization/Resident Name ft Y R c/ Z✓ e e-- Address 2 A4 Y ek,' F l o City, 14 , State ZIP 9ZO� Your Name (p ase rint) �2 vo G IV e Y Phone (optional) �'6 3 / 3/J' Signature - L"Y Commentsmoo- Business/Organization/Resident Name { 7/ Address FQ L'2-3 62 /1�C 1A/ �/ L� City, 4� State e-14_ZIP ZG 6 Your Name (please print) Phone (optional) Signat Comments Aft; Business/Organization/Resident Name //f r.J l�7 // I o,✓ Address [y q 1 (3 AR LA Dos C i 9- City, Imo- State ZIP �-C Your Name (please print) Phone (optional) Signature Comments LJ r 1 /cit I �� pjA �. 1'� ds ;,�itss s 1 ,r-T�f?(T- �u s Nrzs�f Business/Or ization/Resident Name �= Address City, State/ ��ZIP Yo Name (pl Phone (optional) Signature C �ents S ' Business/Organization/Resident Name ..... Address � 2v�1i��.�o�/ City, State ZIP Y Your Name (please print) ��/�� �,r� Phone (optional) Signature Comments Business/Organization/Resident Nama" Is n w ao Address JSG 71 Grl- City, ko h_�4b aef'c(n State44 ZIP Y2(-� Your Name (please print vi - e, se Phone (optional) Signature Comments Business/Organization/Resident Name ��r� Address rolcQ 904 City, -i4A4i^ / State ZIP 2708 Your Name (p a e print) Phone (optional) - S3 Signature ' Comments Business/Organization/Resident Name jl14 f " Address City, LkA State Ca ZIP Your Name (please p i i Y/A Phone (optional) Signature Comments LOU' Mmkiihirry KIM We acknowledge by signature that we oppose the plan and concept of allowing another automobile tube center, known as Jiffy Lube, to open in our immediate area. The area of concern is at the corner of Adams Avenue and Magnolia Avenue. Our local area has far too many similar facilities and does not need another. Therefore, we the residents, ratepayers and local business owners of Huntington Beach formally request the Council to reject this proposed business entity on August 19 1999. Business/Organization/Resi nt me _ Address City, State zip Your Name (pieas print) _ ,' hone (optional) - Signature Comments Business/Organization/Resident Name Address/9j-:M city, _ , . /�=G _--..__.. state Co- ZIP 9:5�1'4�a Your Name (pl se print)4�0 �S Phone (optional) Signature Comments Business/organization/Resident Name o'fL ric kl ON S Lrjd Sc AP N S Address 9-0 2 n� d o_���!�_Q_s �! c 2 City, 1�1 ;a !�e n 1 State ZIP Z 6 Your Name (please Tint) oe A C- Phone (optional) 7 x " O i 2 7 Signature Comments b _ N-d 'f )fie dT N�SS�- S Y f Business/Or ization/ esiden amen o Addres , .,,City, State 607I P Your Name (pi se print) r Phone (optional) Signatur Comments J Business/Organizat' n/Resident N me J Address 3 2 S City, 1j . 6 State ZIP �z Your Name (pleas pri t) S-�" G —�21�, Phone (optional) --Signature Comments Business/Organiz tion/iRsideintime 'Aw /9 Address City, A�2aState ZIP Your Name (plea print) Phone (optional) Signature Comments Business/Organization/Resident Name jo L 6 Addresst' City, _LLa, State C� ZIP f'>6 6 Your Name (pleaw print) v� 1v o15 Le Phone (optional) 4 Signature Comments We acknowledge by signature that we oppose the plan and concept of allowing another automobile tube center, known as Jiffy Lube, to open in our immediate area. The area of concern is at the corner of Adams Avenue and Magnolia Avenue. Our local area has far too many similar facilities and does not need another. Therefore, we the residents, ratepayers and local business owners of Huntington Beach formally request the Council to reject this proposed business entity on August 2 19W Business/Organization/Resident Name x Address x City, State X Z!P _x_ IZ Your Name (pie print) 605rr-� K IIUS -_.Phone (optional) Signature C O Comments - P/( Business/Organization/Resident Name x C �a�C G✓� �_vin Address - t q 13 H uU+1rL �.04 ��- C� City, State G4 ZIP x a� Your Name (please G&�awj Phone (optional) -_ Signature X `_- ��_ Comments _----------_____-- -- _ Business/Organization/Resident Name x AddressS Clty, X �" - -- StBte>QA—ZIP x Your Name (please print) =--� ( ~ Sjm_ve,V, Phone (optional) Signature /< Comments We acknowledge by signature that we oppose the plan.and concept of allowing another automobile tube center, known as Jiffy Lube, to open in our immediate area. The area of concern is at the corner of Adams Avenue and Magnolia Avenue. Our local area has far too, many similar facilities and does not need another. Therefore, we the residents, ratepayers and local business owners of Huntington Beach formally request the Council to reject this proposed business entity on August it 1999. 2 Business/Organization/Resident Name Address d© ECA, W- 9 Gam' -- - --- � �J_.__-_ state ---- ZIPYour Name (please prir. ) �" . . .� . d_� .FIT_- -Phone (optional) Signature _ Comments Business/Organization/Resident Name Address --- city, __ _ State ZIP Your Name (please print) _ Phone (optional) Signature Comments Business/Organization/Resident Name Address -____-- city, state ZIP — Your Name (please print) Phone (optional) Signature Comments r� i _���1��i1���i ��r�rtUITICAN We acknowledge by signature that we oppose the plan and concept of allowing another automobile tube center, known as Jiffy Lube, to open in our immediate area. The area of concern is at the corner of Adams Avenue and Magnolia Avenue. Our local area has far too many similar facilities and does not need another. Therefore, we the residents, ratepayers and local business owners of Huntington Beach formally request the Council to reject this proposed business entity on August JK 1999. 2 1 Business/Organization/Resident Name Address /771a C-AM'I0-rsr% <� city, W B___-- --_--_-- state 4h zip _q,�-1 _ Your Name (pI ase print) `Too-- Phone (optional) -7/1/ 37-5 _ Signature _ Comments Business/Orgenization/Resident Name &0-4- r-a _ s Address MM 701-rrry City, 4,Vrby4�/ ASkciq�_-. State CO ZIP -7607 Your Name (plea print) [c�,�,ywc/ c «hone (optional) Signature Comments Business/Organization/Resident Name 1 D2t Address � City, State Cl - ztPT U Y-4 Your Name (please print) Phone (optional) �i Signature Comments Business/Organization/Resident Name Address G",� 61 City, State ZIP Your Name (please print) C • �u�-c� c� Phone (optional) Signature _ Comments Business/Organization/Resident Name '—t Address City, [�im IiG n/i &aCo State '� ZIP Your Name (please print) Phone (optional) - Signature Comments Business/Organization/Resident Name ��� Address 2.0 I S 1'Ir1 S� =;92)I City, State ZIP Your Name ( le a int) E FF H la, I � b Phone (optional) Signature Comments Business/Organization/Resident Name Address City, State ZIP Your Name (please print) Phone (optional) Signature Comments We acknowledge by signature that we oppose the plan and concept of allowing another automobile lube center, known as Jiffy Lube, to open in our immediate area. The area of concern is at the corner of Adams Avenue and Magnolia Avenue. Our local area has far too many similar facilities and does not need another. Therefore, we the residents, ratepayers and local business owners of Huntington Beach formally request the Council to reject this proposed business entity on August 1999. 2 Business/Organization/Resident N mer,_ Address City, ___-- —_ --- State -ZIP Your Name (please print) _ — _ --__ Phone (optional) Signature Comments Business/Organization/Residen Nam Address _ City, ----___--- Stat Z1P Your Name/ lease pri t Phone o tlonal �y Slgnature�,- �p - Comments Ct - Business/Organization/Resident Name rJ � Address � _ l� j Y City, State �-ZIP Your Name (please print) IZ 0- 4 Phone (optional) Signature — 1 Comments ;SF. Business/Organization/Resident Name &(g Address City, State ZIP { Your Name (please print) )0jEG1,4)j4 (;j�)jrjg� Phone (optional) Signature Comments Business/Org ization/Resident Name 6`,� �e Address D 5 6- cell City, V 13 State CA ZIP z Your Name (please print) Phone (optional) _Signature Comments Business/Organization esident Name 1A eC.c. c:: Address 0\4S Z City, �t�•�.� u,�� � � ;,: Stat" ZIPQT.C-4-(, Your Name (please print) Phone (optional) Signature a� Comments Business/Organization/Resident Name �-� Address City, State UP ZIP Your Name ( ease print) aL1144W Phone (optional) Signature ,r Comments F� O PETITION- Huntington Beach On the vacant lot just east of the 76 gas station ( Magnolia & Adams ), A proposal is in the works for the creation of a " Jiffy Lube " station. This would increase the traffic at this very busy accident prone intersection, slow down the traffic because of entering and exiting from Adams & Magnolia, and would create an industrial development in an otherwise shopping area. Seniors using this intersection would find it even more of a nightmare We ask that the council reject the proposal when it meets Aug. 2 PETITION- Huntington Beach Name 13oh N ow4a t S Name Address o1l i�`'�a s 4 (4 W I-M AddressZ:6K eFg& lei Tel. #— O ---?D 9d Tel. # y4 Signature SignaturazE Name Name ul A t,T Eg, R. Q z,N�l s a+� Address Address a�r 4 4 S t t xpux Qs , 41 z QA, Ta 6 46 Tel. # C —_ Tel. #' Signatwe Signature W �r'�• 66txj- AddreNamq,, Iq�ah".Ag � Name Address ,!mac PA qQ7 Tel. # Tel. # Z-:;-Zi C--7 4 `f' Signature Signature Name Name P-,,6 - Address \o kl rs,1c,4 Address S�2 i CmA 1 T�� Tel. # c-\45 o Tel. # •7 9f. -gyY-3 Signature N `D - i Signature Name ' _ � y`0 Name e� Address ,yam qo 9% wc1 tIRg-id Address b'r,f4I t3CII- Tel. # 9LIQ- -cbli!� Tel. f7 1 0 Signature Signature Fa, Name _,ysc I Name Address?��2 .r/��L Addr ss Tel. # � �.( �p2 2 Tel. # 711- ci& d-- `/F e Signatur i nature C PETITION- Huntington Beach Name -t\\ hem tea\ Name ow tj Address t 0 3 ►�e K-�ti L s wve 1 Address VN; 7-: -b o Tel. # Lo q-i9p9 Of Tel. # Signature :J2s- Signature Name Gc-�i Name Address Address Tel. # '?il r crGZ Tel. # Signature Signature Name Name Address (cii Address Tel. # - .Tel. # Signature Signature Name w 4AName Address Address Tel. ` 9 2-2-4 Tel. # Signature Signature Name M v to E-t%-k U Name Address Address a C7'�ZY� Tel. # CI& 1-2-0k.9 Tel. # Signatures Signature Name l '�•�1 Name Add ess Address Tel.'#- Tel. # Signatur Signature nd concept of allowing We acknowledge by signature that we oppose the p ''-,a another automobile tube center,. known as Jiffy Lub :` .tci ppen in our immediate area. The area of concern is at the corner of A ems;avenue and Magnolia Avenue. Our local area has far too many similar ` ' ` fes and does not need another. Therefore, we the residents, ratepayers an local business owners of Huntington Beach formally request the Council to reject this proposed business entity on August It 1999. 6usiness/Organization/Resident Name Address�" )'�jmil, jyo--c�()-Q CW-2S4- of VZ City, "� _ _ --- State -- A zip. Your Name (p as pri t) _ ._.-.—_ .. ._ ..._. ._�._�_ Phone (optional) - -- ........ signature Comments Business/Organization/Resident Name _._� � ? ze2i Address state ZIP <�2 :.�w Your Name tea rl s'"""`r—� Phone (optional) cp ) . 7 Signature Comments Business/Organization/Resident Name Address CRY, _state zip Z4:�Li Your Name (please print) due Phone (optional) '3 7 Signature Comments ^ � A • We acknowledge by signature that we oppose the p ;,and concept of allowing another automobile tube center, known as Jiffy Lub ;.to'4pen in our immediate area. The area of concern is at the corner of A � .iris ,Avenue and Magnolia Avenue. Our local area has far too many similar " `1'ties and does not need another. Therefore, we the residents, ratepayers an local business owners of Huntington Beach formally request the Council to reject this proposed business entity on August it 1999. Business/Organization/Resident Name Address '7 / --{/ IA city, �_�� State (L_ ZIP Your Name (Pie aprint) _ Phone (optional) Signature Comments Business/Or enization/Resident Name? 9 -_ City, ` - - State( ZIP `� Your Naar please prl � _ h !"�{-, C., Phone (optional) Signature ...-_.. ._... _ Comments -- -- - - -- _ ---- Business/Organization/Resident Name ip O_J Address V ?2. S � 'u o — City, ;v ► � ,�� � � � ._._�-z�- Stet® ZIP,��i Your Name (please print) LL- Phone (optional) ' Signature Comments __ mmu i fly ?Ell-rloim We acknowledge by signature that we oppose the p : :and concept of allowing another automobile lube center, known as Jiffy Lub ;.to"open in our immediate area. The area of concern is at the corner of A r Avenue and Magnolia Avenue. Our local area has far too many similar ." ies and does not need another. Therefore, we the residents, ratepayers an local business owners of Huntington Beach formally request the Council to reject this proposed business entity on August jK 1999. Business/Organization/Resident Name J .Ales_ ._..__1e�2 Address a U V 6 Z re k1 S?o v►-e_ Z- it City, A'Z`y►,4 70 N _... ,e�G�1 State G�_ ZIP —9 Your Name (ple se print) - _- - - ; _—_— Phone (optional) Signature Comment Business/Orgenization/Resident Name .. Gk co oz-i Address ---- city, State 44 ZIP a2d� Your Name (pI se rin b �.�� Cam _147T� Phone (optional) Signature _ n comments — R///z1 .,� 120 VZ1 _1►J� --�" Business/Organization/Resident Name Address city, State ZIP Your Name (please print) _ _ Phone (optional) Signature Comments COMMUINIi I prnlium We acknowledge by signature that we oppose the plan and concept of allowing another automobile lube center, known as .iffy Lube, to open in our immediate area. The area of concern- is at the corner of Adams Avenue and Magnolia Avenue. Our local area has far too many similar facilities and does not need another. Therefore, we the residents, ratepayers. and local business owners of Huntington Beach formally request the Council*to reject this proposed business entity on August 2, 1999. Business/Organization/Resident Name Address /4% City, li State ZIP Your Name (please print chi/e i� Phone (optional) 7/� 53�• ��36 Signature ` Comments .Business/Organization/Resident Name Address City, State ZIP Your Name (please print) Phone (optional) Signature Comments Business/Organization/Resident Name Address City, State ZIP Your Name (please print) Phone (optional) Signature Comments h1fri PETM Commul We acknowledge by signature that we oppose the plan and concept of allowing another automobile lube center, known as Jiffy Lube, to open in our immediate area. The area of concern is at the corner of Adams Avenue and Magnolia Avenue. Our local area has far too many similar facilities and does not need another. Therefore, we the residents, ratepayers. and local business owners of Huntington Beach formally request the Council to reject this proposed business entity on August 2, 1999. e Business/Organization/Resident Name Address -2-.D 1-7 �L C [�0 C- C � t•1 ity,'\.1��-�rAq� �, Q,�p�� State � T ZIP � ) y �O Your Nam (please print) Phone (optional) Signature Comments —gy.;z t Act �o� yvv yy � ," Business/Organization/Resident Name Address City, State ZIP Your Name (please print) Phone (optional) Signature Comments Business/Organization/Resident Name Address City, State ZIP Your Name (please print) Phone (optional) Signature Comments _ IMMUt IN We acknowledge by signature that we oppose the plan and concept of allowing another automobile lube center, known as Jiffy Lube, to open in our immediate area. The area of concern is at the corner of Adams Avenue and Magnolia Avenue. Our local area has far too many similar facilities and does not need another. Therefore, we the residents, ratepayers and local business owners of Huntington Beach formally request the Council to reject this proposed business entity on August It 1999. 2 Business/Organization/Resident Name d-2tJ&N'� v Loa &.46 -- Address City, - State ZIP Your Name (ple se print) fit. Phone (optional) ^ _ Signature ___ ____ _ Comments Business/Orgenization/Resident Name Address City, ____ - ___-__------ State ZIP Your Name (please print) _ _ Phone (optional) Signature Comments Business/Organization,/Resident Name Address City, _ State ZIP Your Name (please print) _ _ Phone (optional) Signature Comments commui if rr PE71 r1 We acknowledge by signature that we oppose the plan and concept of allowing another automobile lube center, known as Jiffy Lube, to open in our immediate area. The area of concern is at the corner of Adams Avenue and Magnolia Avenue. Our local area has far too many similar facilities and does not need another. Therefore, we the residents, ratepayers. and local business owners of Huntington Beach formally request the Council'to reject this proposed business entity on August 24 1999. Business/Organization sident Name D�- Address it /aji,Do (; 14 w City, Abn- Staterr ZIP Your Name (p ase p 'nt) oc- C� Phone (optional) Signature Comments Business/Organization/Resident Name Address City, State ZIP Your Name (please print) Phone (optional) Signature Comments Business/Organization/Resident Name Address City, State ZIP Your Name (please print) Phone (optional) Signature Comments r E,;TIT UC tj We acknowledge by signature that we oppose the plan and concept of allowing another automobile tube center, known as Jiffy Lube, to open in our immediate area. The area of concern is at the corner of Adams Avenue and Magnolia Avenue. Our local area has far too many similar facilities and does not need another. Therefore, we the residents, ratepayers and local business owners of Huntington Beach formally request the Council to rejeri this proposed business entity on August A 1999- 2 Business/Organization/Resident Na _l} _. LWi!)!t, Address Ooti Pj::0 nA CRY, 1� _. _ cej7n4t....---. _ ... - -- -- State _CA ZIP 0 Your Name (please print) Jc�a- e.p Phone (optional) Signature --- Comments Business/Organization/Resident Name .-­ Addresscity, ZIP _ __. -_..---- --__-----State ZIP Your Name (please print) _ Phone (optional) Signature Comments Business/Organization/Resident Name Address City, _ _ _ State ZIP i Your Name (please print) Phone (optional) Signature Comments _. .....__ _-..,. .. r� :::.•...... . .::•-y;+.t,„^`j '; ::-t:n .. �i�i�Y u.4„f:�'S - :1�,,Kt, ..n ,Y Nx.. r l. ;'k Fr ,t x o i aFre'L-''h .t!a tA „+i,E 4«� .nYs _.S'a c�}':4 - .; ,.rka. �,, •=7 �y1 �r =. ZPi. ?" i -1'.t �t+•.; .it •, !F t. 1 � N, -� ',:p ,rrE is��r ,F,.:r �'�.•w k.� � ,a'i[ qr -�r'S ,4 Er -fi i J La K­� V C .�.>,,..: �. r'•�`rr po -1:- t :Anr't""-F 5:.,::^.' r .. --� ,i. L�u�..•.} ,:,. ,T..s,. � �v#}S'4u .e,�:. .,.�.,1J �,: ° A.;: r-s;.•.,,,.r, ..�.. }. .• ..y..,,7, t,. :.:..,i;,-.. .,•tit. .,; 4 •J'iY �, ,il N:. 7.. :ICY -!, W.., .%.+.;:A.y1; -:1.?f :5t} " m'1r.`"+.,: .♦ ....� FY ;� '_ >L...: 1'n ),}T., Nl.. s. •a,y �'S it,n k.:;.e^;,"i;'>. :✓�^,5 .fMt,��, .,i.� ?rt�. _ aii �i.. r4 {f;<t t �1' .qt+ Al, 'J F`'., > /;. .�{ s w :: r ..;y !,d r n.4 ..s ? ' 1 aA+C'1^•t:^ sw - {, tf a next le ear9 ! �A a ,an ai'Chitectura>and _ "You g'tea >at of laig ;vela; -fig`firm„dnth d ees in, i gp!i e. cles p T�"Fe m '�5t'� w apt' GAStaf'l esa` tt ,q rt.� i .tA� (97�1aCQ5�,;' a91 .�Ol1R r is t •, k II}��JtI�Z'S� fP SaA ��enie y`t 10 S Ykr, >{ ` �' *.i- 'ei,'y� Laguna e11'h's a, t t, tt nOW,require a i ie��`$1�e " eP A, C Communityxdet�elopmentx e� ` pat'lt ` space, h is5 t set{ 0,f +3r mint"dir Lt r ��T is h in L fi , P w Q a tq<ei , ide4i �18 f¢et lode 0 er Ci �7 8: � aaSYRlldarY1$'��t� „ The size of th, blic arkm �' �� ,,�i�f ^' The Q'range,County Register �t;+ �s >'u , P 5 g of 9�feet by 19 feet {' ,�, a I f , r space hasf shrtink for 4eandee� 'pl}e chaoges cai�recce The,! arch begings,as Peggy with��m4nca"�ta�stc Aeats" ; oapaxlung�`s Blytlg mangvers her' green,3 ``With the1}eii+l�val of�th � 7Oa,,`rage'by 5 per"c3eittrt'o 15 bin 't ' fF J F �4 Jt� r 'LC4 ) 1 F Aerost$r nttoRa parking ggarage gas erisisF imatonsts turtietl to For new dcvelopei's� e�ti}cr -; WARMIN33 IN She scans tits town,searching;for 5 smalIer cars;to save=gam;a0tt�e: dust Part offdo>t} 'fiu".st�gas k' a t e Eno 'for hf1 V8111 § 1i*ku1� ' Ot ORdena 'xi $R ' tag 'P Ps R Pin 1 3 . g t!$h Pp 4 trim an ld : Residents in i. cle,r�byPassingremallgr�{``com cities peened regulaxibns=elloyv be inconvenient said` x� iin'A' search of rk s ac 's then + van ui ar ara esof a�'rtam k r- D P tha g P r g$ B k Ce > rogtvnal;vice regidf,k: scarce parking ca�i t:squeezennto x siize to allow a certain ereent�' �a t. r� r1 i, r p Wlih}ir m} l4r OC a h 5�Vl0US.Y d�: I get duiged up all the tune, ag>3 oi?m'fpa�et spacesi Ttiq cunt transportation consu�tu{ > a+ heed the `,I, ' $lythe{8aid, ointzn +t0 the car8 ao s ces �B li 78�1 f7 f@�t if,F 1< i sr r s+n ._ rx 1?a „ Yf It is=!MIYT� PIOs Qf adtnandion ,; a yng tit0,ssdes of her�vanz�#pesti °lichee or t,rvi by iSE feet °back aiid c�i5ange('ae ` � this Sign m dR mopy; t0 the'. dis$dAantageez�Of PO�lg k n xr Y is'r tpkt r r lQt�k �ir Ule�11a,3JJ, ?4 81lq Q�1 theP driving a large vetici e , y• 'But{pea `le are+briyusg evgr� hel ed x vet Y pp p P .a Balboa y As'.veln0 es ljecome.larger,its+ lA.rger vatucles Signs `of k then: Orange C�Oun. deal VIA 4- Peninsula to k a drill many drivers know But it times molude Ford's plans to ui- {chan�Ing req�urementaF Newpport z could<,be a problem that a going troduce Jthe 19 foot long Excur `Ken Gordon;owner,of, 1 Bea6h''Silt it the way of the Yugo + siod this fall the largest sport 47t&fier ui yHunhngto F' 3p j t1 compact"space ice and more cities m utiht� vehicle in the market �- welcoies the xrelief;; he * vaii'ich+are Or a Countydand:nationwide and General Mo#QFq-,, r 's re r. p p�,y his S tV,rho rfi F are . sing dat compact spaces 5 cent ann0i}ilcement thet tt plans g� t d+cros §Ws giving way to; . ' rkiiigbrs, ,F s parking spots as motoristsincrease-their appe- to: mainstream ;the fltimmer, hopui, nolghbdrm y e motorists" trte foil ever�larger cars which is afore than 7 feet`wide don't skim the liters °tits hiss, for,b�99er San Clenneute,Newport Beach` "VPe saw is trend that trioved vehicle u J ; f� vehicles hai and"Santa Aae have:eliminated people'back ... the larger'car, "I°hulk it is a good thizag^"a�id ' ' been available Coi�gpact spaces altogether nth ` seelang morecomfort anilypow Goz:do#,`i34�}'of theexp�dding� these cars er,�ates,bite Laguna Beach;;sill or; said` hff Smith,vice press spaces" Iteads to less damage woV)d.have fib be c iderin9 the chgtige durpag dent of :International them:nlcely _ � ;�, � '.1 y , '� i i �. x, iwt j,�,f�rsh} r::Fttt ,u'• }4f'a, ry 3 >;;t LK z , `a+ r ,,, To What K tSSC1e5 WOUid you Ir Waif 1nfoLine:R1M 550r1636 " , r ..� 1Ii: s,' $` �/�Fsic to{{79&=3684 Attn Y -; •,,.i•., ;. i5 „''•_f .. r ...., .: i1h: 5.'.;-` '1e:.' .�',+_2 7J 1 ,.►Ylhibe:BillCunn idce'to see et�plored in�:the Gmwth eeriest Bxt;72&6,and leave a.valea message= �foeuspaga�linit�reedo{rr ccm ,r'��Ctlnningham focus Page, Co4�hty Reglsber,Psi .,;•, .., 'e.. ,. ..,:,.r_, ter. ... Y w SPACE TO PARKY More cities in Orange County are scrapping the "compact car" space in reaction::; to motorists' gusto for larger cars. Here's how the change helps cars fit: FULL SIZE STALLS COMPACT STALLS I 115' ► More and more Orange County residents own vehicles, adding to a growing parking crunch. W Orange County since 191 2,000 In thousands 1,500` M . 0''.: Source:The Department of Motor Vehicles, International Parking Design The Orange County Register 3 fl=}����' ' Y1'3'61•` t l � SY'�ft § ,. y1df »o'er• ,■ r >< a,yy o�.1 F i I i3 te -"�r,. .r i Ji1!`••�;'i�.,4d.A4u.r, f featured in .State: Farm; s :a ray 1, 1999 LOCAL NEWS an Brous I�st Y - •1 `most-d .. o- g Huntington residents 7 TRAFFIC: But cityf s po- ,MORE INSIDE agree w ith state Fag 111 ;. .:,, lice say there's worse ►ACCIDENTS: Residents.agree with, Y � `�� ?•I than Adams Avenue at insurers Pick.Local News 7 no STUDY: They and �: ;Brookhurst:`Street. t„ . nearby workers say a; tersection last December,,;,he:,, `+' ; ey OLIVIA HAWKINSON says, and he'd be a dead man. r, they have seen too M: The Orange County,Register• Instead a left-turning 1 pickup many accidents at crushed the front of his cherry- 9, HUNTINGTON• BEACH — red Corvette. r r f Brookhurst and Adams. ®®® ■ 3;. T,his!citytvBrookhurst,Street and•- f r: is Cameron' and others say .a 7 Adams. A•venneeia'nintersection' BRUCE CHAMBERSfrhe Re ister �. combination''of heavy traffic g. By.OLIVIA HAWKINSON . i=Sn'1N3�I!io 6tun+caccidentsa,in•„they, � t� arsfation,`the largest auto insur- high .speed: above the posted FATAL SPOT: The family of The Orange County Register limit,of 45 mph'— and drivers'.-,'.Kristina Bridges, 1.7, maintains a t ance,company;Ays. HUNTINGTON BEACH—The State;Farm Lnsurance report-. disregard for red lights. makes' .memorial:at Adams and ;.w t _ the',intersection,scar Brookhurst,'where she died in a sounds of screeching tires'and ' ed 2`32 claims '. ' most fender ?' metal colliding with brick still ibenders not reported to police- car.'rash in'1996. ! rip Involving the intersection in 1998: Once a 1,week there s some gin Henry Mereness ears. thing.going.'wrong in that inter- The mechanic was working at ,Stater Farms.study..of the 10 Tom Brohard;interim city trans fa 1 section, said Cameron„62, an the Shell service station at. ,worst ptntersechons includes°an; Irvine resident who works at Oil- portation manager. Brookhurst Street and Adams The Orange County Register'1 'offer ofaltotal;of$1 2 millionao, Max lOsminute Lube: "Cars'are` Police, who recorded 25 acci- � r$1p7ommuRities ;,study.::.,,the dents.in the intersection in the Avenue in summer 1998 when ° pxolilem amd make im rove-. hell- en wn a street. There same period,say it's actually the four-cars collided in the intersec- corner contribute to the problem`f i p are no right hand turn lanes,and p tion. One, a Toyota Camry, —cars pull out from driveways,." 'ments?'Hltntit5gton�"Beach''offi sixth worst in the city. They say its just a poor design. crashed through a low brick wall into•speeding traffic. ' mis<gay-they4nay'iaccept,.• > more heavily traveled Golden- i' and landed on a grass island in Accidents in the lots weren't .� i!,` •.Stan Cameron,who works near The city is installing right turn;, west Street and Warner Avenue, front of the station. counted in the study, Brtookhurst,and Adams, can re- .lanes in each dire6ti, and engt Slater Avenue and Warner., and i Mereness rushed to the passen- City traffic engineers say 1 1� fate to,the study. neers may',install camer4!, to;;i Beach Boulevard and Warner all ger and cut her out of her seat 85,E cars a day travel through �r ,{i! few more, ches into the,in- ,catch red-light violators,}said+r tie fd� No,1. a belt with his pocket knife. The the intersection.Busier intersec—'.`' woman was cushioned by an air tions along Beach Boulevard see'V R bag and walked away from the more than 100,000 cars a day. • ' ' - accident. State Farm reported no fatali- i y \. he crash was one of 25 report-. ties in its 232 claims,and none of e to police in 1998 at an intersec- the in ersection's 25 accidents re- ported\ \ t „_i;, •� c� tion that State Farm Insurance, ported to police in 1998 were fa- IV \ d, the largest auto insurer in Cali- tal. Nine of the 25 were injury:y q '$' :;. fornia and the nation°hasmanked'r' accidents. ' Two other California intersec-�F In-a-study 'released'Wednes- ;.tions made the.Top 10 list. day, the company named the ', Wilshire' .Boulevard and Santa y. ..busy intersection. the 'nation's�r;,Monica.,.Boulevard in Beverly . ; Hills'came in fourth with 242 ac- . 1 ;sixth' ;"iaost�`.�dangerous'?� State;,:, , Farm ,reported,232' claims — ',�ctdents,:'. Fair.;Oaks- Boulevard;y_ ` most minor,fender.,.benders not, ,and Watt Avenue in Sacramento-. re ported'to police-.=fromtheiri= trailed Huntington Beach with;.t N \ tersection•ia'1998.' - `People'who wdrk in the area of the intersection"say Ilargi shop-' t,10. DANGER:'Huntington intersection �r ping center'parking'lots.on each e;''.!rakes Top•10..Local News MIR 909532GS59 P FgNTICOLA CO T-674 r=-Oa2 APR 22 '99 12:51 1 � a t• CARL ' S JR . RESTAURANTS • W Karcher Eaterpritee,Inc. One City kJO Ats Wd W*t Suite 350 Osage,CA 9280 � i (714)94d3440 April 14, 1999 y Mr. Christian Fanticola Fanticola Co's.IncJ"Jiffy Lube" 978 Amelia Avenue San Dimas,CA 91773 Re: Proposed"Jiffy Lube" Magnolia&Adams Huntington Beach,CA (Adjacent to Carl's Jr. Restaurant No. 125) Dear ivir.Fanticola: In accord with our recent meeting,your plans for the referenced Jiffy Lube(KHR Assoc. 2110/99)have been reviewed by personnel of our Carl's Jr.operations division together with our Architectural staff. Their review is favorable,as noted by the following: 1. The exterior elevations, site plan and floor plains depict a proposed Jiffy Lube facility that appears to be very compatible with our Carl's Jr. Restaurant and the surrounding shopping center. The proposed building vA l be a modem "Up-Scale" facility -onth,attractive arcZuitect features,iucludiag a unique landscaped trellis along Adams Avenue and a self-contained,fully covered trash enclosure. 2. The proposed removal of approximately 19 parking spaces will be mitigated with replacement "Compact Parking"and will also result in smooth flewb&mar-obswxted traffic pattmrns" 3. The proposed Customer Waiting Area and Gazebo Patin Area will provide comfortable accommodations for the JA- Lube customers. Howevrr, we must be provided with written assurance that your facility will only offer coffee/soft&uhk reftesbnexAs and that smack foods, sandwiches,breakfast items, ice cream, candy bars, etc. will not be provided to the Jiffy Lube customers. 9095928659 A FANTICOLA CO T-674 P-003 APR 22 '99 12:t,-� Mr.Christian Fanticola Carl's Jr.No. 125 April 14, 1999 Page Two y 4. With focus on the Adams Avenue driveway,next to the nor`.heast corner of your parcel,and due to the rearrangemeut of parking spaces and modified UvB.c circulation,patterns,we will n&d a small "Happy Star" sign within the planter area along the east side of this driveway. I have enclosed a plan depicting the necessary sign and location. In closing,please contact me at 714/944 3447 if you have any questions. Sincerely, - . CARL KARCHER ENTERPRISES,INC. Tarry T.Young Real Estate Asset Manager LTY/sr cc's w/enclosms: Charles Ball Rosanna Deckard Carl J.Heinz Tamara Schippers Joe Tonmd BUSINESS PROPERTIES APR 2 DEVELOPMENT COMPANY .2 �ggg 17631 PITCH• P.O.BOX 19586 IRVINE,CALIFORNIA 92623-9586 "'1 Opp i, (949)474-8900 FAX(949)474-8936 April 14, 1999 Ms. Amy F. Wolfe s Associate Planner City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Re: 9032 Adams Avenue C.U.P. 98-89 Jiffy Lube Dear Ms. Wolfe: This is to advise you that I, as owner of the shopping center, have reviewed and approve the layout and building elevations for the proposed Jiffy Lube facility as prepared by KHR Associates and shown on KHR Plans and Elevations dated February 10, 1999. Reduced copies of the Site Plan and Elevations approved by me are attached hereto for clarification purposes. Sincerely, B siness ropertie L.C. mull, rustee or the Smul! Family Trust Enclosures C: Tamara Schippers Mr. Christian Fanticola KHR Associates Jiffy Lube 2355 Main Street 978 Amelia Avenue Suite 120 San Dimas, CA 91773 Irvine, CA 92614 -CGB/pm PHOP-I OFFICE 8024 NORTH 24TH AVENUE,SUITE 310,PHOENIX,ARIZONA 85021 • (602)995-9113 •FAX(602)995-0809 r BUS INE PROPERTIE S DEVELOPMENT •�. 17631 FITCH • P.O.BOX 19586 IRVINE,CALIFORNIA 92623-9586 2 (714)474-8900 41999 FAX(714)474-8936 1 May 21, 1999 Planning Commission City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach,Ca 92648 Re: Conditional Use Permit 98-89 Jiffy Lube 9032 Adams Avenue Dear Commissioners: _ In the last 30 year I have developed more than 554,000 square feet of retail commercial space in the City of Huntington Beach at five (5) locations. I continue to own and manage these properties. The existing structure at 9032 Adams Avenue is a special purpose 2,500 square foot use, built originally for Walker and Lee Real Estate. The space has been vacant for more than three years and there has been no interest shown by anyone. We looked at the possibility of building a 6,000 square foot multi-tenant space but could generate no interest from the market place. i Jiffy Lube has desired this location for several years. The layout and elevations proposed in the application before you are an outstanding example of the applicant's efforts to address the concerns of the City and are compatible with the balance of the property and the adjacent automobile service station. I urge you to approve this application. Sincerely, US S PROPERTIES L.C. Sinull LCS/pm PHOENIX OFFICE 8024 NORTH 24TH AVF-NUE,SL-rrE 310, PHOENIX,ARIZONA 85021 • (602)995-9113 •FAX(602)995-0809 Robert and Peggy Wilson 20042 Shorewood Circle Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Mq y _ Home Phone(714)219-0716 _ 2 5:1999 : r�©FpZANAli,{ May 22, 1999 Howard Zelefsky, Secretary Huntington Beach Planning Commission 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 . PERMIT NO. 98-89, I am writing today in-reference to a notice I received regarding conditional.use permit no. 98-89 to,be: heard by the Planning Commission on May 25, 1999. My husband and 1 are very-concemed with the - property being altered and rebuilt-as a Jiffy Lube, and would like the Planning Commission to hear our.... - concerns before any decisions are made. We own it-home just south of the.Drug Emporium shopping center, and we see the traffic problems that exist on a daily basis. There is not a'signal.to get out of the main entrance/exit of that shopping center, and we have personally witnessed too many close calls.with vehicles trying to turn into traffic. This is especially true when there are cars trying to come out.from the bon.Jose/Zubie's parking lot.across they street of the sametime..We feel that building a two story building as proposed would further complicate an already complicated#ask by blocking the,view of vehicles:trying to go into and come out of the shopping center, thus causing_more traffic problems. Living so close to this shopping center,we are also concerned with the added noise this type of business could-bring. We would ask that the Commission consider the residents directly,adjacent to the center,..:. and what we alreadyhave to put up with in.terms of noise brid traffic, before making a decision.; -As business owners ourselves,,we are all for new business ventures and competition, as long as it does not impose on nearby residents. However,there are already too many businesses in this area that provide the same types of services as the"proposed business...There are two locations right at Beach 8 Adams,-an.Oil Max and Goodyear.at Brookhurst&Adams; another Goodyear at Brookhurst&Garfield, along with a Jiffy.Lube soon to open on Magnolia'&Warner. All of these perform essentially the same services and there are many more locations within an immediate 2 mile-radius,- We don't feel that there = is a great enough demand to warrant the possible problems.that this particular building and business.,- could cause.: : In closing, we are not comfortable with the proposed changes and plans; and would like the Commission to seriously consider the implications that this new building could have on traffic and the immediate neighborhoods. We ask that the Commission vote against the building as proposed in conditional use permit no. 98-89 at this.time. We thank you in advance for your time and consideration in this.matter. Robert and Peggy.Wiison x MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, MAY 25, 1999 I Council Chambers - Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California STUDY SESSION - 5:15 PM (Room B-8) REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NEGATIVE DECLARATION—David Biggs SMALL LOT STANDARDS ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT— Wayne Carvalho AGENDA REVIEW—Scott Hess REGULAR MEETING- 7:00 PM PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE P P P A P P A — ROLL CALL: Laird, Kerins, Chapman, Speaker, Biddle, Livengood, Mandic" AGENDA APPROVAL Arryone wishing to speak must fill out and submit a form to speak No action can;be takzn by the Plann ng Cotnmtssion on , this date, unless theatem is`.agendied Any one wishing to.speak on items no[ontonight s agenda or on non ptbltc hearing items may do Sad ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Speakers on items scheduled for PUBLIC HEARING will be"invited to speak during the.publtcaieartng__ (4 MINUTES PER PERSON,NO DONATING OF;TIME;TO OTHERS) A. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS NONE B. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS B-1 ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 98-4 (DOWNTOWN OUTDOOR DINING . WITH ALCOHOL) (CONTINUED FROM THE MAY 11, 1999 MEETING: APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach LOCATION: Downtown Specific Plan Area PROJECT PLANNER: Peter Vanek y Transmitted for Planning Commission consideration and recommendation to the City Council is Zoning Text Amendment No. 98-4, a request by the City of Huntington Beach to amend the Downtown Specific Plan(DTSP)to permit the consumption of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with outdoor dining on public property. The item was continued from the February 9, 1999 meeting to allow the Planning Commission to establish a sub-committee of three Commissioners to work with staff on issues identified during the public hearing. The sub-committee met with staff over the past three months, including a walking tour of the downtown area's existing outdoor dining establishments. On May 11, 1999 the Planning Commission conducted a study session to review the proposed ordinance, resolution, and license agreement and then continued the public hearing to May 25, 1999. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend approval of Zoning Text Amendment No.98-4 to the City Council for the following reasons: • The proposed zoning text amendment provides specific standards and procedures for consumption of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with outdoor dining within the Downtown Specific Plan. • The zoning text amendment will contribute to the atmosphere and ambiance of the Downtown area by attracting a clientele consistent with the redevelopment of the downtown. • The proposed zoning text amendment will not adversely impact the City's review and public hearing process. The proposed zoning text amendment is consistent with the goals and policies specified in the Land Use and Economic Development Elements of the General Plan. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Loretta Wolfe, 411-6t' Street,Downtown Residents Association, spoke in opposition to the request stating that the bars currently operating in the downtown area are a problem and the proposed outdoor dining with alcohol with aggravate the problem. Marie St. Germain, 505 Alabama Street, Downtown Residents Association, spoke in opposition to the request stating that the bars currently operating cause too many problems especially when they close down at night. She stated that this proposal will aggravate the problem. THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. The Commission suggested a continuance of the proposed request to allow time for staff to explore regulatory options proposed by the Commission,to receive input from the Police Department. The Commission also proposed that the license agreement be the primary document to regulate outdoor dining with alcohol. PC Minutes 2 (99PCM525) I