HomeMy WebLinkAboutUse Permit 73-36 - Daniel/Webb Construction, Inc. - Construc A*ffidavit of P ' lication
V
,q,41e of California l
County of Orange ss
City of Huntington Beach �
George Farquhar, being duly sworn on oath, rays: That he is a
citizen of the United States, over the age of twenty-one years.
That he Is the printer and publisher of the Huntington 13cach
News. a weekly newspaper of general circulation printed and pub-
iIshed In Iuntington Beach, California and circulated in the said
County of Orange and elsewhere and published for the dissemination �(
of local and other news of a general character, and has a bona fide i
subscription list of paying subscribers, and said palkr has been '
established, printed and published in the State of California, and
County of Orange, for at leas: one year next before the publication
of the first insertion of this notice; and the said newspaper is not
devored to the interest of, or published for the entertainment of any 'pyblish"o Nu,runt en 8with ttfr June
particular Class, profession, tr;uie, rallinr-, race or denomination. or �d. 1!n -
any number thereof. "lfQTIEt:Of t tiiC1G f "W"a
The I3undngtcn Beach New was adjudicated a ;es-al nvwspnher ' ` A�'tl ►L 7Q sE1li�►1`-.:~..
of general circulation by Judge G. K. Srovel in the Superior Court comalve"'1 .ust; rZotMIT M73.M
of Orange County, California Auguct 27th. 1937 by order No. A-5931. i TOTATiVC TRACT.140 01.7"
NOTICE tS .NE4k3;Y ��Ytt ttiit 'a
_ public heasift Wfit;Qs'held"fay tile"pity
,7"APn:' :T ' �`, - 'CaunCi! of ttm C14.0t k"Unaw ia+lch.
That the - ' ;n tt>4 Council Cptmtw.:of tl+e Cite:
Centet, %;ntlnxton 't3cach. Ot:"thit twur
t�•)?r i i i! :,�i �t i. '.i c� .;. ;^ i ,: of 7sA0. P M., 0r 6s:'saon tt»/t�r"at
��:•, y.. y postible.' on-Monday,. the-SM'-&a of
of which the testnexed is a ted copy, was pu' lned in s<cid nears- .July.,1913,.for.th#.Puma".Vf..orensid+rini'
sn`appuaf to.tho'baole fry"City 146ti-
mnt` C rip ilaslon of 04ii iT if*1 Us+
paper at least No.' 73-036;and.1tMtWVo TMt
_. f ap�7f�o. J95Q to l bow•ther tenstiucuvr,
it-ptsrntsd-rkh"sal 'deft-
< a'1.55 saro,`•Pemel .of land
commencing from the day of _��^_:_f,. ._._ ___.. _ �l 1•#' , Law,-vecw-y R461deAtiat
r.otyfcict- F1ann+d flesh-Ittxl. The sub-
p.- jRl'lareparq Is tested on the'.south s:da
1.13— anJ ending on the rfay of of,tlr••snd',1 0vib and Ms feet east of
Sabah A !asap OesatlpIRM it.
elis'cftrl lit:`trip;ftisrmlrtq 17atsurtmCnt•i1';-:
19=_, both days Inclusive, ani as often during said period and
tunes of ublir�ation as said paper was re-ularl • issucil, and in the hll lnsarrasd �+arscas wil Invll�d ta.
P l�l l~ 5 atirhd=sate! Mafrinx•ind,';" p+atr,;
regular and entire issue of said pewspaper prn;er, runt not In apWvn.',1w,or sdagt';sal aop+es!,.to�
supplement, and said notice wa; published therein on the foi'nc•ing Uie-Petmit;aid Tchis4ir�a TrW,rh%.*
dates. to-wit: Aranhei '*tmf*d
from tft off►i*I of tJM;lcft'Cf&*. . .
Q;^. ALlCtA,M. tYMO TIi '
I�hblisher
Subscribed and sworn to before me this _____,_'� �. _ clay of
__._____ -�yi��4arxt�is,:..�:�_fr�� __ . 1\ntnr�• I`IJhlir
Oran;;e County, California
•.�� THOMAS
t aJ. WY LLI
E
c•CNalaty Public �1.
Ca
llo EiaMr Commil
S.pla1. 4
_ 2 VALENCIA
I I L
J
R)1 FRIEa�AMD
i
cuILDER
oR R3
C4
h x
�s
z L� o `�
� J
� �X C11 i C4 R5 - --�-
.�. AVE SLATER
fl 1I-lu.
OPAL CR ..
�W- DRFilm-
I
p row
!)CAL[
of
P SIT NO, 73-636
I ACRES
rru�rr�+,rrw a.�H
MUNTIM Y NN MCH KENNOK K T.
V
;I`ti'r'' A: '.•,7f T t •IC �i r��c CUY�;H �1AVf"r1 1I(tmroymEt1S 6, ;Rr I AT t ^;•! • Ar, ►�rLD tl�!
lr'r I + 37►+ 1913 , ANC T -E r!)LLr't' IN: P11015^iALS WrFiC (' I :i ''t:':;t'(' A v; !GtrO
0-4 -A -»ARLN• :
( r T-jr r'»Cr,EN i EAS'ACNT LCCATrD on T'HE WESTVNLY , I DE: � ° T"E rX 13 T I N
1t1�r IS STILL A VALID 20 FC.t,T EA:IENT A3 OrSCRIRFC1. '•" "HC Hf*fv '—
.';..►t�R^, ►,ti�tt Tq I .ri EAS-ArNT i 0 REMAIN IN ITS Er 1 ST I N(' LG A t I ON AND IT
BE: nrSTR ICTEO Tr) WALKINA%l nNLv , A40 NOT OPEN TO ANY TYPE MOTOR 'AArF IC
TU OR FROM SLATER AND THE PRnraSFd DC'/ELOrmEN T.
2 1,11E PPnPOSE THAT A IOC? FOOT BUFFEri Z014E: EX TF'NO TO TtiF, F l r'ST RESIDENTIAL
STFi;,'CTtJRE OF THE PROPOSED DEVELCPMENT FROM THE PEAP. r'I•• nEQTY LINES
r,F THE 51t,1;Lr FAMILY HOMES LOCATED ON THE WE'STfreLY SIDE aF MARKEN
LANE. IF SA10 STRr1CTURES ESE` TWO 1STORY WE PROPOSE THAT SAID TWO SYORY
BE CONSTRUCTED SO THAT NO W I ND6WS APPEAR FACING T'IE REAP. OF THE
F.rSIOENCEO� ON THE WESTERLY 91DE OF MARKEN LANE , IN 7r^ER TO AFFORD
rHE: PRESE?iT HOMrOWNERS ON !BARK EN LANE THEIR PPtSENT Pr I VACY.
�. ALTER14ATE PROPOSAL TO t TE:M 2. '.YE PROPOSE A 30 FOOT BUrFER ?ONE LRCM
THE REAR PROPERTY LINES or THE: DEVELOPED SINGLE FAMILY HOMES LOCATED
ON TKE WESTERLY Si ! D£ pF MARKEN LANE , TO THE FIRST SIN -3LE STC'?Y OVi LL--
1I; , 017 THE PhC'PCSED DEVELOPMENT . NO TWO STORY STRUCTURES ARE To ESE
CONSTRUCTED CLOSER THAN ! CO FEET FROM THE EX1STINr. DEVELOPED PROPERLY
LINES LOCATED ON THE WC Ii TERL Y SIDE OF MARKER LANE • WE FURTHf k PRC•P-
OSf. THAT SAID T*O STORY STRUCTURES BE CONSTRUCTED SO Tt1AT NO Y# INDO*S
APPEAR FACING THE -RESIDENTS ON THE ''WESTERLY SIDE OF MARKEN LANE , IN
ORGER TO AFFORD THE PRESENT HOMEOWNERS THEIR PRIVACY AS INDICATED
IN ITEM 2.
4 . ME THE HOMEOWNERS PROPOSE THAT A FINISHED MALL BE AT LEAST SEVEN
FEET IN HEIGHT TO DF PROVIDED BY THE DEVELOPER . SA10 FINISHCD BLOCK
*ALI. TO 8£ MEASOJRED FROM T11E PRESENT PROPER;Y r)*%CRS ON THE WESTERLY
SIDE OF MARKEN LANE. WE R{FER TO THE PRESENT' DCt-CL ' PUO SIDE AND AT
THE: PRESENT PROPERTY LEVEL � SAID FALL TO SE 7 rFE T ON SIDE OF THE
HOUEO*NERS ON TKE WESTCALY SIDE OF MAMXCN LANE , FINISHED WALL.
�j. IT WAS F1jRT'l,." DISCUSSED AND Ai1REED THAT THE: PRESENT (3LOCK VVALL
CLOSING OFF HOLLAtib DRIVE WILL NOT SC OPEN TO ANY TRAFFIC , MOTOM
OR PEDESTRIAN Of &NY TYPE# AS AGRCEO TO 6Y THE -' I TY ?OUNC1L AND THE
HOMEOWNERS OF T► I: Wit,; TCM HAvtm TRACT.
MR. V I NCENT P. I PENT N^���CsYrt�ER ASSOC.
GUARCELL0 OUT01H HAVEN 'R4:T .
ya, R01IIERT REDMAN VICE PRE 91DENT �'��
r
•, rub l i s pWOMOWWW 6 ? 7 .rwr ritw.rn
Postcards . Ag
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HZARING 71111
APPEAL TO DUNIAL
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 73-036 & TENTATIVE TI ACT MAP NO. 7950
lWICE 1S NEREF)Y GIVEN that a public: hearing will be held by the
City Council of the City of Runtington Beath, in ;:he Council
Chamber of the Civic Centex, Huntington Beach, at the hour of
7:00 P.M. , or as soon thereafter is possible, on Honda
the tc, day of , 1911 ., for the purpose of
considering an appeal. to the denial by the City Planning Conraission of Conditional
Use Permit No. 73-036 and Tentative Tract Map No, 7950 to allow the construction of
a 24 unit planned residential development on a 3.86 ,acre parcel of land in the rl-PD
II
Low Density Residential Dieatrict Planned -wsidentta).. The subject property is located
on the south side of fiulland drive and 265,5 feet east of Beach Boulevard. A legal
description is on file in the Planning Department Office.
All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and
express their opinions for or s,geinst: sold a , eal to tine Permit- and Tentative Tract
Further Information may be obtainitd frca th* Office of the City map.
Clark,
UIri71 6/21/73 CITY OF RUII'TINGTON BEACH
BY: Alicia H, Wontwarth
City Clerk
r
UP 73-036
Daniel Webb Olaf Knudson James L Wilson
4S2 E. Orangethorpe Ave. Kinney Shoe Corp. 8172 Guilders Pr
Placentia CA 221 Park Ave .South Huntington Beach CA 92647
New York , N .Y. 10003
Orange Co. Flood Controal Charles F Autrey Richard G Mullen
P, .I. Box 1078 531 W Hill St 17322 Marken La
S,e.,%ta Ana, CA 92702 Long Beach , CA 908n6 Huntington Beach , CA 9Z647
itdte! Div of 11wy3 Wendell W Lorbeer David M Ciulei
P.O. Box 2304 Term Annex 865-0 Ronda Mendoza 1734Z Marken Lr,
Leas .kngeles , CA 900S2 Laguna Hills CA 9$2653 Huntington HEach CA 2647
H. B.U.H: S. D. Doan-Russell Co
1902 17th St. 10700 Ventura Blvd Suite A John M I.ightner
Hunt Beach CA 92646 No. Hollywood CA 91604 173S2 Marken wn
Huntington Beach CA 92647
Ocean View School Dist. Arthur J 110
7977 Wairner Ave . 3331 Bounty Cir Manuel F Martins
Hunt Beach, CA 92647 Huntington (teach CA 102649 0171 Holland Dr
Iuntington Beach , CA 436.17
Cordon 1: Hanson
Centruy Properties Fund 17301 Marken 1.ii Roger A Ai ller
611 Santos Cruz Ave fluntingotn Bench CA 1,1641 300 Poppy
*nlo Park, CA 94025 Corona 1)c- 1 ;Jar CA 92025
Wm Lyon Development Co Wolter ,, ":ettle
P.O. Box BH 9691 'innsor Bray;ford L Palmer
4463 Birch Ga _Jen C-rove CA 9Z644 174SI Meer Cir
Newport Beach } CA 92660 Huntington Beach , CA 92647
Crutch Haven Homes Sarah 11 singleton .John C Herzog
W+a Lyon Development Co 17321 Marken Ln 17441 Meer Cir
P.O. Box 8I1 Huntington Beach . CA 92647 Iluntingto.n Reach , C.A 92647
4463 Birch
Newport Reach , CA 9?660
Ira E Sholdon Fedo le J Ciardullo Merrill R Clanin
8047 abater 17341 Marken Ln 17431 WtEe T Cir
Huntington Bench , CA 92647 Huntington 11casrh .:A 92647 hunt Besich CA 97,047
4airgaret Prenininger 11nuaillu U Garcia William A Dale
1472 W. 4th St . 17351 Marken I,n .17421 Meor Cir
:os Angeles , CA 90020 luntington Reach . (7A 92647 Hunt 110aels , CA 9-10&* ,'
r �
Edward A Ballard James W ~loser I)avid 1. Stnnton
17401 ;Meer Cir 17432 Marken Ln 17441 Martan Ln � �
liuntinUton Doach , GA 92647 funtington Beach CA 92647 Huntington beach , CA .647
,Yank Newton RiC and 1) ''urges
17391 Meer Cir 17442 'farker. Ln C 0 Hi;kley
Hunt Beach CA 92647 17451 Marken Ln
llunt liaarli GA 92647 Hunt Beach CA 92647
Rodolfo Segura William W :,owe
17381 Meer Cir 17182 Marken l,n Arthur B Wade
�
Hunt Beach , CA 92647 1616 ` Broadway
Huntington Ifl:ach CA 92647 Santa Ann , i.A 92706
William If Hopper
8182 Holland Dr 1.«474" a is en Lae Kay 1londa
Nuns Bench CA 926�i7' 1 "r�17u `•flrken l..n 8112 Slater Ave
funtington Ll:ach CA 9:'6•17 }hint Beach CA 92647
Ralph E Werley Walter W Lasken
8162 Holland nor '1 '1361 t'rkc cLn 11242 Weatherby Rd
Hunt Beach CA 42647 I "r t ' eashn Ln Los Amalitos CA 90720
Hun t Beach CA '.�?ti47
Emma M VanBuren
81S2 Rolland Ur FigleRichard L Kehoe
Marken17381
Huntington Beach CA 92647 John C Markenn Ln 8132 Slater Ave Huntington Beach CA 92647 Runt peRcti CA 92647
Jospeh Zee Jr
17382 Marken Ln Frederick L 7391 C71iver E )fndley
Hurst Beach CA 92646 1 Llker 400S Warner Ave
73J1 Marken Ln Bunt Beach (:,t 926A'l
Huntington stanch CA 92047
Gerald C Perigen Alfred L Wa
17392 Marken Ln y Jr
Hunt Bench CA 92647 L7401 `larken Ln
bunt Beach CA 92647
Froderick H MacGregor Robert L Redman
17402 Marken Ln 17421 Marken ).n
hunt Beach CA 92647 Huntington I0401 CA 92647
Richard If Knutzs)n Jr. Vincent Guar.cuello
17422 Marken Ln 174321 i'larken Ln
)funt Peach CA 92647 HUu . RLich CA 92647
S1 EMENT OF THE ACTION OF CITY CO IL
Council Chamber, City Hall
Huntington Beach, California
Monday, July 16, 1973
Mayon Matney called the regular meeting of the City Council
-of the. City of Huntington Beach to order at 7:00 P.M.
Councilman Present: Bartlett, i3ibbs Greeu,):Caen.a,Duke1 Matney
COtifici.lmen Absent: Shi0 le x•i Ui�
s�k�kk�k+Y���*�1r�k�t*�r9r*�k1r�r7kie�Vr�:��hk•�e*�{c�F�F�k�N:*�k1k�k�rlr�r�i+t�k�ttlk�►rk�k�•�~lr��r�r�r�•Ir*�Jtdr9r:4�k�k�1r�•�4�r�ik�1-�;ir ,
PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL - COND, USE PERMIT 73-036 - T.T. MAP '7950 - APPROVED
Mayor Ma�ney' a' noutic ' that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing on an
appeal' f iled.b�, Daniel/Webb Construction, Inc. , Placentia, California, to the denial
by the Planning Comission of Conditional Use Permit No. 73-036 and Tentative Tract
Map No'. 7950 to allow the construction of a 24 unit planned residential development
on a 3.86 acre parcel of land in the R1-Pb Low Density Residential District - Planned
Residential. The subject property is located on the south side of Holland Drive and
265.5 feet east of Beach Boulevard.
The City Clerk informed Council that all legal requirements for notification,
puLlicat{on and posting had been met, and that: other than the letter of appeal she
hed received no communi,,ations or written protests to Conditional Use Permit No.
73-036 and Tentative Tract Map No. 7950.
The Planning Director presented a resume' of the Planning Commission's reasons for
recommending denial of Conditional Use Permit No. 73-�036 and Tentative Tract No. 79:50.
Discussion was held between the Planning Director and Council regarding the provisions
of the Planned Residential Development section of the ordinance code.
In response to a question by Councilman Duke regarding procedure, the City Attorney
spoke regarding the legal aspects of the matter.
Mayor Matney declared the hearing open.
Mr. Ira E. Sheldon, 8047 Slater Avenge, City, addressed Council and informed them that
he owned property directly south of the proposed development, and spoke regarding the
status of the easement on the property.
Mr. Lamar Stewart, Engineering Representative, representing Daniel/Webb Construction,
Iri. , addressed Council regarding the proposed development and spoke regarding the
density factors involved. He stated that he believed their company had met the intent
of the Planned Residential Development section of the ordinance code and requested
Council approval of the matter.
Discussion was held between the Council and City Attorney.
Mr. Edward Kerins, Planning Commission Chairman, addressed Council regarding the
proposed development.
Mayor Matney suggested that staff study the possibility of modifying the Planned
Residential Development .section of tilt: Ordinance Code so that a distance separation
other than 25 feet could be allowed between single detached units.
Mr. Robert L. Rr:dman, 17421 Marken Lane, City, Vice-President of the Dutch Haven
Homeowners Association, addressed Council and stated that their organization favored
the proposed development.
Mr. Ed Webb, Daniel/Webb Construction, Inc. , developer, addressed Council regarding
the proposed development and stated that he believed it was a desirable project for
the City.
Discussion was held by Council on the roaster.
tbere, being no cne pranent to further speak -on the matttor, and Blare being no° further
-protests filed, Either oral cr writteu, Ghe hearing wan closed by the Mayor.
• . , `l L
Huntington Beach Planning Commission
`*- P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Planning Commission
DATE : June 25 , 1973
ATTN : David D. Rowlands , City Administrator
RE: TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 79SO
USE PERMIT NO . 73-036 APPEAL
Applicant : Daniel/Webb Construction , Inc .
452 E. Orangethorpe Avenue
Placentia , Ca. 92670
'� 0 24 it (single
Re uest : �o permit the construction f �. unit (s g
family homey) planned residential development on
3. 86 acres of land in the R1-P9 Low Density
Planned Residential. District ,
Location : South side of Holland Drive , 26S . 5 feet cast of
Beach Boulevard .
Planning Commission Action : Denied - June 19 1973 for the
following reasons :
Use Permit No . 73-036
1 . The proposed project does not conform to the intent of
the Planned Residential District Ordinance .
2 . There is not a 25 foot separation between buildings .
VOTE :
AYES : Bazil , Kerins , Porter , Wallin , Higgins
NOES : None
ABSENT: Geiger, Boyle
Tentative Tract No . 7950
1 . Use Permit No. 73-036 was denied .
2 . The project does not comply with a specific plan .
VOTE :
AYES : Bazil , Kerins , Porter, Wallin , Higgins
NOES : None
ABSENT: Geiger , Boyle
' Su;rurary of. Staff Report :
The staff coixurred with the concept of a detached single family
planned development and felt that provisions should be .. ade to
allow this type development within the city. The provisions of
the ordinance code are such that most of the planned developments
within the city are developed as attached townhouse type complexes .
Additional Information
A public hearing was held June 19 , 1973 on Use Permit No. 73-036
in conj3unction with Tentative Tract No. 7951 . Mr. Jack Millet ,
Millet and ling , representing the applicant , addressed the Commis -
sion speaking in favor of the proposed project ,
;-Ir . Vincent Guarcello, a property owner in the area and President
of the Dutch Haven Homeowners Association , discussed proposals
submitted to the City Council at the time the zone case on the
area was considered . A copy of these proposals are attached .
I
Environmental Status
Exemption Declaration No . 72-105 was apprevel by the Environmental
Review Beard or. January 16 , 1973.
r'
Sci ortin Information Submitted Herer stir
1 . Staff Report
2 . Area Map
3. Dutch [tag*en Homeowners recommendations
Information to be Submitted at the Public Hcaring:
1 . Staff Comments
Respectfully submitted,
K. A. Reynol s
Secretary
KAR:ntimc
encs .
CONSTRUCTION,INC.
452'E. ORANGETHORPE AVENUE
PLACENTIA, CALIFORNIA 92670 7116
(714) 630.3770
June 21, 1973
21
City Council
City of Huntington Beach
P. 0. Box 190
Huntington Beach, California
Re. C.U.P. 73-036 and
Tentative Tract No. 7950
Gentlemen:
I respectfully appeal the decision of the Planning
Commission of June 19, 1973, in their denial of C.U. P.
73-•036 and Tentative Tract No. 7950.
f
Respectfully submitted,
ZY
R. A. Daniel
RAD/lml
l.r +
STAFF REPORT
TO: PLANNING COWISSION
FROM: Planning DeP artmenc
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 7930 DATE : ne 19 , 1973
in conjwiction with
USE PERMIT NO . 73-036 ZONE;: Rl-PD
APPLICANT: Daniel/Webb MASTER PLAN: Low Density
452 E. Orange tho rpe Ave Re a ldent ial
Placentia
LOCATION: South side of Holland Dr . -
265 . 5 f t . east of Reach Blvd . '�'�����' ' •�". "
M�.I
UP REQUEST: To permit the construction of 4 }
a 24 unit planned residential ,
development- on 3.86 roc, . o :' land � �in the RI-PD Low Density Planned
ReSi�:ential . '
TT rt QUEST: 4 s 3 ng 1,. faml.l.y r:omes f
GENEJUNL 1NF0R!,1 TIO:; s
Tentative Map No . 7950 and Use Permit No . ; ; - 036 i, a proposal
to construct a 24 unit planned development on a 3 . 6 acre parcel
of land recently rezoned RI -PD by the city . At *he time Zone
Case No . 7' - 48 was before the City Council the R1 homeowners
to the east submitted a five point recommendation which was
taken into consideration by the Council in their approval action .
(See attachment . )
PRESENT LAIND USE AND 2-70"I I.NG :
Subject property is zoned RI -PD Low Density Residential District
and is vacant at this time . The property to the east is zoned
R1 and developed with singl family homes . The property to the
north across Rolland Drive• is zoned R3 Medium high Residential
and developed with an apartment complex . Property to the Crest
is zoned C4 and developed commercially . Proporties to the south 40
are zoned R5 and are vacant except for a single family home upon
one of the parcels . (See attached map . )
MASTER PLAN :
The blaster Plan of. Land Use has this property shown for low
density residential development by Asisrer Plan Amendment No . 73- 1
•• Staff Report
Tentative Map 7950
Use permit No . 73-036
Page Z
SUBDIVISION CONWITTEE REVIEW:
;he Subdivision Committee reviewed Tentative 1%fap 795C at the
June 8 Subdivision meeting . Following are a number of items li
discussed with the developer at that meeting : site plan , density ,
diversification of unit types , minimum floor area , private
patio areas , coverage , setbacks from interior property lines and
public streets , distance between main structures , widtlis of
private drives , parking ast-ignment and facilities , recreation
and leisure space , signing , roof materials , association fees ,
and the number of school age children generated ,
It was the consensus of the Subdivision Committee after a
lengthy discussion on the separation between the ruin structures
which is shown on the play, at 10 ft . would have to be pursued
by a conditional exception . It should be noted that this setback
occurs at six locations within the proposed development where
said separation of 10 ft . is between a garage to the side of a
dwelling unit and at 8 locations where said separation is
between main structures . However , the Committee discussed this
detached type of construction and were informed by the developer
that in no case were there windows existing in opposite walls
across this ter, fo,%t separation closer than 26 ft .
The Committee also discussed the private driveway width and it
was the consensus that the developer should revise the plan to
provide parkin bays wl .hin the driveway section of the north -
south drive an to re-iuce the driveway section of bc,th east-west
drives from 30 ft . in width to 28 ft . width to restrict parallel
parking at those locations .
The Subdivision Committee also informed the develouer that he
should be prepared %o discuss with th - Planning Commission a
possible future permanent access for the develcpment from Slater
to the south across the R5 property , tie informed the committee
that he is only proposing a walkway easement cor school access
at this tire . The developer also stated tkat he was proposing
wood roof material on all sloped roofs , either wood shake and/or
shingles . However , there is a flat roof portion of one of the
units upon which the developer has proposed rock . The developer
sluestioned the feasibility of she•ving lot lines five feet out
from exterior walls of the dwelling units and was informed that e
this is an accepzarle vractive , however , provisions of the CCGR' s
would restrict f'e:icing other than that constructed upon initial
development anti only permitted around the private patio areas .
The developer was also instri:;-ted to prepare finished grade
elevations of the footings of the proposed wall along the east
property line for review by the Planning Commission at its
June 19 meeting .
' Staff Report
Tentative Map 7950
Use Permit No. 73-036
Page 3
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
(Revised I'lot Plan received June 13 , 1973)
1 . Total dumber of dwelling units - 24 units
1 . Gross area of project - 3 . 86 acre-
3 . units per gross acre - 6 . 2 per acre
Units permitted - 6 . 5 per acre
4 . Bedrooms per gross acre - 17 , 09 per acre
Bedrooms permitted - 20 per acre
S . Net land area - 3 . 043
5 . Percentage of site coverage
Permitted by code 0 - 16 units
Actual coverage - 431
7 . Recreation. and Open Space
Required by code - 2 g , 800 square feet
Area provided - 29 , 100 square feet
8 . Unit information
There are three different unit types proposed within this
develorment . Two of which are sisiglc story and one a two
story building . The two story structure is a four bedroom
unit , one., of the single story structures is a two bedroom
unit and the other single story structure is a three bedroom
unit . All of these units have conformed to the livable open
space: per unit .
9 . Parking
Each unit has been provided with two covered parking spaces
immediately adjacent and attached to the unit . The total
parking provided within this complex is Ill parking spares ,
required by ordinance code - 108 spaces .
10 . Private pa- io areas
Each unit has been provided with a private patio area . Unit
type one , a single story two bedroom unit has been provided
with the private patio area of 306 square feet . Unit type
two a one story three bedruom unit type has been provided
with a private patio area of 504 square feet . The two story
four bedroom type unit has only bean provided with a minimum
270 square foot private patio area whereas the ordinance '�
code requires 400 square feet . The developer has been
informed of this discrepancy upon the revised plot and has
indicated that he will have no difficulty in providing the
full 400 square feet and will have a revised plan for the
Planning Commission ' s review.
Stiff Report
Tentative Tract No. 7950
'Use Permit No. 73- 36
Page 4
11 . Student generation based on the most recent
information - the project would generate 15 . 6
elementary and 2 . 88 high school students from the
proposed development .
12 . City Revenue/Expenditures
Net gain or loss/acre/year - + 49
13. School Revenue/Expenditures
Net gain or loss/acre/year
Elementary School - - $331
High School - + $324
I .
Total per acre - - $ 7
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS :
A request for an Exemption Declaration has been filed with the
Environmental Review Board, posted for ten days public input and
subsequently approved by the Environmental Review Beard.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION :
It should be noted that the developer has filed a conditional
exception to allow the ten foot separation between main
. buildings . This application has not been sat for review
as there Has riot sufficient time to have it heard in conjunc-
tion with this tentative map after the Subdivision Committee
meeting on June 9 . This application has been filed pursuant
to the City Attorney ' s opinion that the exception provision
(Section 9310. 46) of the ordinance code is not legal .
i The staff concurs with the concept of dttached single fasily
i planned developments and feels that provisions should be wade
to allow this typa of development within the city. The pro-
visions of the ordinance code are such that most of the pl*nnod
' developments within the city are developed as attached town hoist s �
type complexes . a . ..
RECOWENDATION :
In view of the above information and if the Planning Conn-asiqa
concurs with tho appliLant' s concept and feels that the ppropoi#t
' development seatsthe intent of Article 931 (Planned ResidentiAl:
Devdlopn*nts) the staff rc:ommends the Planning Commission, after
a thorough review of the co'aplex, instruct the staff to set the
conditional exception to re reviewed concurrently with
r
Staff Report
Tentative Tract No. 7950
. , Use Permit No . 73-36
gaga 5
Tentative Ma 7950 and Use Permit 73 - so at the Jul 3
p Y
me if t
Planning Commission tiling, How vex a the Planning
Commission does not elect to continue these applications
to be heard with the CE request and requires a physical
cc attachment which can be accomplished through the use
of good structure to serve as a breezeway between structures
at the requested ton foot separation the staff offers the
following for your consideration :
1 owing conditions r
1 . The tentative map and precise plan received June 13,
1973 shall be the approved layout .
2 . A 7 foot high decorative masonry wall shall be
constructed along the cast property line . The height
of said wall shall be measured from the finished trade
of the RI properties to the east . A 6 ft . masonry
wall shall be constructed along the south and west
and north property lines . Plans for such wall
construction shall be submitted to the Planning
^apartment prior to the issuance of building permits .
3 . The CCSR' s and association rules shall contain a clause
limiting the total number of votes allocated to rentals
to 49% of the total number of votes of the association.
4 . A wood breezeway shall be constructed between all units
where soparated by ten feet . Minimum width of such wood
breezeway shall be ton feet .
� S . The C .SR s and associstioi rules shall cont
ainain a clause
prohibiting the storage of recreational vehicles
within .
this planned development .
6 . Full insulation of all exterior walls and ceilin s of
the dwelling units shall be required to help minfmite
the burden of heating and cooling systems .
7 . All dwellings to be provided with forced air ventilation ,
8 . Disposal of building spul1 , unusable lumber , tarpaper,
wire , pipe and other excess or unusable waste shall be
dumped at off-site facilities equipped to handle them.
t
9 . The development is to be constructed with balanced power
to reduce possible overload on any one energy resource .
10 . All applicable conditions of the standard conditions
of approval for tentative maps dated May 230 1973 shall
be complied with .
r
6
Page #2 - Council Statement of Action - 7/16/73
. )
A motion was mode by Councilman Barlett to overrule the cle� ision of the 1 Tanning,
Commission and approve: Conditional Use Pertult No. 73-036 and 'Tentative: Tract No. 7950,
and failed to pass by the following; vote:
AYES: Councilmen; Bartlett, Matt,ey
NOES: Councilmen: Gibbs, Green, Coen, nuke
ABSENT: Councilmen: Shipley
On motion by Coen, Council overruled the decision of the Planning Commission; adopted
Exemption Declaration No. 72-105 and approved Conditional Use Permit No. 73-036 and
Tentative Tract Map No. 7950, subject to those conditions suggested by staff in their
report . dated June 19, 1973, with the exception of #G - relative to breezeway construction.
The motion was passed by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmen: Bartlett, Green, Coen, Matney
NOES: Councilmen: Gibbs, Duke
ABSENT: Councilmen: Shipley
On motion by Green the regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Huntington Beach adjourned at 11:20 P.M.
to :.'Mand§y,.- ,,August 6, 1973 at 5:30 P.11. in the :iministrative Annex
The motion was passed by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmen: Bartlett, Green, Coen_, Duke, Matnev
NOES': Councilmen: None
ABSENT: Councilmen: Shi2le-y, Gibbs
Alicia N. Wentworth
City Clerk and ex-officio Cler'of the City Council of the CAt -
of. luntington Beach, California.
ATTEST:
M
Alicia M. Wentworth JerKX A. Matney
City Clerk Mayor
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
County of Orange ) ss:
City of Huntington Beach)
1, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly appointed, qualified and acting City Clerk of the
City of Huntington Reach, California, do he=.reb, - certify that the above and foregoing
is a true and correct Statement of Action of the, City Council of said City at their
regular meeting 'field on the 16th day of July , 19 73
WITNESS my hand and seal of the said City of Huntington Bench this the 19th day
of July , 19 73
i
Alicia M. Wentworth
City Clerk and ex-officio Clark
of the City Council of the City
of Huntington Beach, California
BY
Deputy
MLA TING 11 KW H �
UP 7
( t0UNDIL - ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION CA 73•AS
•, •; +tar+t�ctdw�e�ar
To . :The :Honorable Mayor and City From City Administrator
Council Members
SUoject TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 7950 Date August 3, 1973
USE PERMIT 73-036
'In order to clarify the action which Council intended to .:
take at its previous meeting regarding Tentative Tract 7950 ,
it: is suggested that a Motion to Reconsider xottld be appro-
priate .
A .Motion to ' Reconsider may be trade by one of the Council
members on the prevailing side namely; Bartlett., Green,
Coen or Matney.
On reconsideration, alternative motions which could properly
and legally be made by the Council would be: !
1 - Overruling the Planning Commission and modif ih
the plot plan to show a 25' separation of build-
ings in accordance with Section . 9310.19 'of the .
HBOC . and approving the Tentative Tract 795d and.
Conditional Use Permit 73. 036, subject to the con-
ditions . in the staff report with the exception
of condition number 4 , or .
Z)* Rb"f'er the matters of Tentative Tract 79S0 . and
�'" Conditional` use Permit 73. 0?6 to the Board of
Zoning Adjustments for processing of a conditional 1
exception in conformity with Board of Zoning Ad-
~-- justaent._P.rocedures . �....._.._..._.,... ... .._ _. . _.....,. .�.. _..,.
3) Overrule the Planning Commission, and approve the
project ; subject to granting of a conditional
exception by the Board of Zoning Adjustments .
. Respectfully submitted,
avid D, Rowlands
City Administrator
_.F l��R/h j s