Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutUse permit 75-22 - Barbara Ann Smith - Construction of a pre -. Affidavit of Pul4ation State of Ca,Mornis � County of Grange sa City of Huntington Bench L'UP George Farquhar, being duly stwarn on oath, rays: That he is a citizen of the United States, over the age of twenty-one years. That he is the printer and publisher of the Huntington Beach News, a weekly newspaper of general circulation printed and pub- lished in Huntington Beach, California and circulated In the said rubii :.Hunt'ntdoa lleaoh:Nw` ._F+rb County of Orange and elsewhere and published for the dissemination oa local and other news cf a general character, and has a bona fide ltt!tCt.tt `FKItNJC !ti/►IttiMQ subscription list of paying subscribers, and said paper has been 'APPEAL 14'"OVAIL OF established, primed and published In the State of California, and C04011l'i0"Af..usE pttytbr r-1410.15,,= County of Orange, for at least one year next before the publIccation Nt7rfcE is HEREBY,GIV9N that a Pub- of the first insertion of this notice; and the said newspaper is not .i "� raid '� ''• devoted to the interest of, or published for the entertainment of any tauncir-of the City of•Huntk*%M GOMJ T', In;;,t�trt. Council ,ChaMbw,.at .the_.Civic particular class, profession, trade, calling, race or denomination, or tkreler, Huntingtun 1liwh,,'st.the.hour. any number thereof. Qf :7:e P.N; ar.as,soon. therlef►K sa The Huntington Bead: New %vas adjudicated a legni newspaper 1$75, fsdsy,--lourp:th.dtcon.. f°atrrttrry, IS71rz for thQ.�ur?4s� of coif of general circulation by Judge G. K. Scovel in the Superior Court siderina an simul-is the': approval try'. of Orange County, California August 27th, 1937 by order No. A-5931. tht City. Planning Commission of Col-. eRticnsl•Use, Fklxl lt. 140., TS.U.,in aibir the construction of a•private silicas tag That tim APPEAL TO APPROVAL OF CONi TTION- icliitr :or the ix+-��ot.. �►�c�;.a criitlr.n from 3 to %Vj yarn of *Vs. sae Ah USE PERMIT N0, 75--22 .facility will consist of nistractmatey. l-, cfivt IS) .classrooms. adMinistxattve"ot•• of which the annexed is a printed ,ropy, was published in said news. �Ing areas t low Tha pi ar h" Is-sheaf plea i to bo in operation fire Is) days a weeks paper at least one issue p t�►s the h,u of s:oo a.m. and 3:ou The subjed ptvpetty•is-Iotsted.rlorttt commencing from the _r`L__,___ day ofFebruary at o' Inc he 02 M and:•s0"SItf 'Rosti t h La !n the R2 t tadirrrt t�etitb Resi- dential District, A -tegat description and Copy of the 1916 and ending on the nth clay of ebruary _ proposed.ptatn is on into to the-Plarming rtpertment MOM All in'crested persons. am invited to ry attend acid hearing ttnd exprrs this{ 1910� both da.p. inclusive, and as often during said period and opinions for. cx against..sold appeal. times of publication as said paper was regularly issued, and in the Further information .lit*'bi obtained regular and entire issue of said pewspaper proper, and not In a from the Office of the ci±lr Clsrlr: . , supplement, and said notice was published therein on the following gll�'EQe.Pnbruary.x,'i97f► `. dates, to-wit: CITY nF"HU)iTIMaTolt,GMM py, �Iicla M. Wsntwwth-,, t i Fe];. S . 1976 ctty perk: j 1 I 4 . V OA • ' Publisher Subscribed and sworn to before me this 6th day of r' G February 19_2�k � Notary Public Orange County, California --------- ................... 1 THOM.AS D. WYLLIE :t.-. ��.tary PaW;a-c.tifo►,�i. j Q Or.gq• coun'y 1 7" My CoTm-istion Erpirrs .,CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 75--22 Page 2 Conditional Use Permit N, . 75-22 was previously scheduled to be reviewed by the Planning Co*nmirsion on January 6 , 1976 . Due to concerns relating to plot plan inadequacies and the need for additional information regard- ing traffic generated, the applicant requested a continuance on C. U . P . 73--22 to January 20 , 1976 . The applicant has since provided additional information concerning factors related to traffic estimates and has revised the plot plan to substantially conform with all. City code requiremp-Ls. 3. 0 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION : The Planning Department has received two petitions ; otie from parents who are willing to car pool their children to qet to and from the proposed pre-school facility and one from local residents who are opposed to the proposed facility being located on Glencoe Street . Both petitions are attached to this staff _9po.rt for your reference . 4 . 0 PRESENT LAND USE, ZONING AND GENERAL FLAN DESIGNATION: The subject property contains a dilapidated single--family structure that is presently unoccupied . It is intendLd that this structure be used as part of the new facility. The site is designated on the City ' s General Plan for medium density residential use of 8 to 15 dwelling units per gross acre. The parcel ' s zoning of R2 (Medium Density Residential District ) is consistent with the City ' s General Plan , Directly north of the subject property is the Sunview Elementary School site. Directly east of the site is a smell apartment complex . South and across the street from the subject site are parcels containing a four-plea residential unit, a single-family home , and an apartment building . An older single--family home Is located directly west of the subject parcel . At the northwest corner of Silver Lane and Glencoe Avenue is an existing church structure. Excl»ding the elementary school site , all parcels Sur- rounding the subject property are presently zoned A2 and all parcels except the school and church sites are designated for medium density resi- dential use on the City ' s General Plan. 5. 0 ANALYSIS As required by the Planning Staff , the applicant has submitted revised plans. The Staff has reviewed the plans and finds that , excluding -quare foote:ge requirements of the outdoor play area , the revised plans Conform or exceed all planning requirements and development standards . 5. 1 PLOT PLAN REQUIREMENTS A total of 8, 400 square feet of outdoor play space is required by Code ( 175 square feet per child times 48 maximum children) . The project. Plan provides a total of 7 , 000 square feet . A total of 1 , 680 square feet of play area is required within the pt-t)pos.oti building ( 35 square feet per child) . The project prr>posod a total of 2 . 000 square feet of classroom spaccc . CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 75-22 Page 3 Relative to nursery schools, the facility shall be enclosed with a minimum of a six-foot high fence. The applicant proposes to enclose the facility with a six-foot high chain link fence . All other requirements - including setbacks , height restrictions , land- scaping, etc. - comply with the provisions of the Ci_t;y ' s ordinance code. 5. 2 CONSISTENCY WITH THE CITY ' S GENERAL PLAN: In that the project is proposed to be located in a residential neighborhood, ati issue is that of the project ' s compatibility with existing and future land uses. As stated in Section 2. 0 , the subject parcel. is located .in an area desig- nated for medium density residential use . As is the case throughout the City, the majority of residential quarter-sections are typically planned to i.^.elude an elementary school site and neighborhood park facility . In addition , quasi-public uses such as churches any' ether .institutional uses are generally regarded as compatible uses that may be permitted within residential neighborhoods . The concept of planning community facilities and allowing certain quasi - public institutional uses within residential neighborhoods creates certain advantages and disadvantages to local residents . The cultural, educational , and recreational benefits derived from the services and activities rendered by these public and quasi-public uses are generally recognized. Ec: . r access and locational convenience are physical factors considered in determining the proper location of community facili- ties within residential- districts . ':'he unfavorable factors are quantifiable in terms of traffic generated and, in the case of a pre-school facility , the noise generated from recreational activities that matr create a nuisance to local residents. Considering the hours of operation (9 : 00 a . m. to 1 : 00 p .m. ) and the scope of the project, coupled with the willingness of parents to carpool their children to and from the proposed facility , all indications are that the traffic generated would not create a major prolelem to local. residents. This postulation is based on a traffic analysis conducted by the City ' s Department of Public Works . Furthermore, in that the City ' s Environmental Review Board has h,:d the opportunity to review the proposed project , it. has assessed all environ- mental impacts , including the impact of the not so generated `rom the project.. The findings of the Environmental Review Board conclude that tho proposed project will not: have a significant adverse effect upon the physical environment . Regarding the site location , the Staff feels that , while the proposed facility will cater to pre--school children otit: -- ide Lhe neighborhood , t:ho potentiality of accommodating pre-school children wit.hitt the ittim_diat o area is apparent . Consequently, the subject Marcel ' s contr. al location and CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 75-22 i Page 4 proximity to the existing school site make it easily accessible and within walking distance to local residents . As stated in Section 4 . 0 , the subject parcel is located botween two exist::- ing residential uses . While it also borders the elementary school site , the proposed facility would front on Glencoe Avenue and consequently have a greater relationship to those residential uses along Glencoe Avenue than the school site. Thus it could be aryued that the pre-school facility may disrupt the character of existing and future residential uses along Glencoe Avenue and may adversely affect property values . The applicant has expressl?d the desire to architecturally design the facility to create a residential-like -appearance of the structure . An exterior elevation .lrawing of the proposed structure Has been submitted and, as illustrated on the drawing , the sLr ,:cture is oriented towards a residential building appearance, includi.nq a roof dc!s.ign similar to the abutting P complex.apartment It is the Stet f f ' s contention that throuc h t appropriate architectural design and proper site p l anning the facility would harmonize wi.ch existing and futrurc, residential uses along Glencoe Avenue . 6 . 0 FINDINGS : i The Staff offers the following findings : i 1 • The proposed plan substantially complies with all annlicahln provisions of the liunti:,aton Beach Ordinance Code . 2 . The proposed use as a quasi--public or institutional use is compatible with the adopted land use designations of t:hc- City ' s General Flan . 3 . The proposed use is consistent with the City ' s CommuNLty FnCi.iiti(�s objective of "Satisfying the quasi-public n^eds of th(.! coo munit:•; by encouraging the proper location and planninca of such a facility. " 7 . 0 RECOMMENDATION : Based on the above findings , the Staff rerc.mmend, approval of Condi t. iona.l Use Permit No. 75-22 with the following suggest.ed conditions : 1 . The conceptual site platy dated January 1 `) , 1976 , shall `)e the %-approved plan . 2 . Prior to final inspection of the proposed facility , ,a landscape plali depicting plant type , si?(? , location , and plan for irriavition shall he subr,-titted r.o the Planning; Dcapar+-ment for approval . 3 A six (6) foot high by six (6) ,inch vide c3ocoraLive masonry %,;,I t l shall be provided on the south proper t.y line . The des iqn and m<at.er i .a l s of the wall shall be subject to review key the Planninq Dep art.molit . 4 . Glencoe Avenue shall be do `.crated and improved a:; requir.od by t he City ' , Department of Public Works . CONDITIONAL USE PERMI'Y' O. 75-22 Pad e 5 5. Fire safety systems shall be required and approved by the Fire Department . 6 . Sol! reports as required by the bcpa r tmen L of Building and Comurl i.ty Devela.1ment shall be submittLd prior to issuance of building permits . 7 . Maximum enrollment of the proposed facility shalt be limited to 40 pre--school children per day. 8. The hours of operation , other than administrative operation , shall be limited to the hours of 9 : 00 a .m. to 4 : 00 p. m. AIA:d:. I i III 111 AW IA All ram...... E 30 CA .._...p... r) m -� --4 30 P-4 1 1-4 A t i - A W !v r AARK J SHER �1 LN rn v) i t'Y1 L N u N � g1�.VH ....`.` .......�.M C `�•i �%,%E C R t f 73 f�IKstot � ITT BEACH BOULEVARD L.J F � ti 1 � ..L.� I ViTf P Cit ' Z./ ';AT / January 29, 1976 s Huntington Beach City Council ? 2000 Main Street Huntin+;ton Beach, Cal. 92648 Enclosed is check for 175.00 as payment for filing of an appeal of conditional use permit #75-22. We, the undersigned after study and much research of all the information have decided to appeal the planning commission } decision of January 20, 1.976. F This pre-school for Auditory memory and social development would to located in a res identia 1 ( R2) neighioorhood which is not fcompatible with existing; and future land uses. The nature of the use: is not meat suited for the location, also confirmed by staff Itr. Dec. 20, ' 75. i The following are just a fete a:lvr_�rse da .:ages that would be suffered by adjacent pr )perty owners : 1.. The applicants sand box noises with (8) eir�ht swings and slides abutting the east property where we ( R. h M. de la rut:sta) own 9 adult apart gents. These noises would be ad•;acent to our living room. A member of tine pl.ani•.ing commission c3mme►;ted alzout tics school on the North ( r��ar) having noises. Most of the time these noises are: of tole_­able level because of the distance. The: school Nand lot play area is 340 feet from our property and the soccer tame sill-lines start at. 219 feet from our rear prop- erty. This is the comparison, 340 feet VS ( no distance) anutt4 our property. This would create a N'1I `_. NCE, VN14'EARABLE SOUND IRRITATION :c HARRASSHE T to us loci-,l residei.ts. It w:>uld be a loss of rent and car vie, a vacs ncy factor forcinr; us to rent to a different elientel. Our privacy :Mould also be invaded by epecial children from other locfstions as far away as 4Yestminster, .3ea l Beach etc . Across from sun ' ect we also own 2- 4 plexes which would b*� effected its above noted o:r rental loss qnd Ingress- egress. C 2. The unbelievable traffic gen :rated L, this facility . This all being propo:;ed to accomodate the .special children in a foreign area at the local resident© expense. Ref. is made to Dec. 30175 engineerin& letter showing 050 to 0 trips per day to this facility rind at an,! fitir:n time 25 vehicles parked at this location. These trips would generate a total of 1723 VJT vehicle miles travelled. Engr. also advises in su*ject ?.etter that about 7U� of trips ivould be through Heil- Silver Lane, and at this particular Intersection there is a sight distance prololem due to an ;mbankmr:nt on North East corner. This A . H. 1:. P. project has been delayel Ind.efinately. So mention was made ei' easterly traffic towards Beach which is Hlt,ht Turn Only, another kottlenF!^'rc . A 'Dec. 20' 75 planning staff letter says, "This would further aggravate tht existing traffic prolplem on 11encoe Ave and rid,lacent, streets. ." A Deo. 30' 75 ltr to H. F. Hartge states the pre-school would ag,-ravate the existing traffic problen and is therefore not Fid vl sa ui e. Parr: 1 a._ C. Us 4 •ate" {',3. ult aujuct, Lu tht: {ii ilut;ca„ ?'j 1 : L uisf,*vi! A v-1. , ri in I l ntr.r.6r, bua cli, C:-1 1 ! . V,c nim( r .'�t:; ri )t .—m6 to �!['li;'�.;�t. :iL arty f.tLut'1. ar•illR, _v,•I, 't L t.11l:l L iul ,irld- r•.• t.und Lhat vrt1Y t:r,v i t ul.- �1. ru ur•r! - Thu :xc• , a tiol.-es created oy t.:a.. �3r-err aria playp -bind t::ju 1pment. a•: JacutiL Lu Au-At uplit•Lil.�.-r,t a rm oul vale hotar:ii wu i Ld make Lne prl::sent. U,itd owners suffer. Atr nc:L on1.1 wo+ild rr- .iaij.til.cUsd to t?ecuivilve pluy.rround noiNLE , �• �t. traffle on tht:1 narrow residential Ar ,,,A. ►�1 •..:h. A . IESS .� ,• r 7071 � ,�t''�Ix.?r*_/,r Syr .�,,•�/[ � •'r:.. �irD / /� .P �,t�,�'• � -, It c•. ,� tl_ � r: , . I Y it ' 3 � ,E �.�. F .��, tt- 1, r/ • /,�` •�� y�t.R , _ c , / .�._ i r % c e i r . [ t. `.IL �IrL�� tti4,/1�� �•. r.,�'� , J` " N �4�.•♦ 4 �• ' f/t♦ 14•• • •� � ... ' , w " . / '-t •�� � C' i-Eci;�t� 71,7 �r t �f- 7�' l �. ,�'/'' d c► -c'. ` .� � ,. 1 '00, ' i% l5 •. . its T' • 4b Hun.t1nSt•.)n Beach City Council Q000 Main Street ki n t ington Beach, Cal. 92648 Enrxosed in check for 175.00 as payment for filing of an Appeal of conditional use perznit #71' . .' 'Nips the ':ndersigned after study An i much research of all ' the Information have decided to appeal the plfinning { ombissior decision of January 25, L976. This pre-school for auditory memory and social development would be located in a residential ( R?) neighfrorhood which is not compatible with existing and fut.are IfAnd uses . The nature of the use is not nest sui`,ed for tt:e location, also confirmed by staff Itr. Dec. 200 ' 75• The following are ,Iuct a few a jv( racy da• .ages tr&at would bQ suffered by adjacent pr �perty owners : 1. The applicart•s sand box noises with (8 ) eigrit swings and slides abutting the east property where we ( Ei. h M. de la Cuesta) own 9 hdult apart•,:ents. These nois(:a would be ad,;acent to our living room. A member of tiie pianring cotamission c,:)aver;ted at-out the school on the North ( r,*�ar) having nol.sea. Most of the time these noises are or toler-ai)l(_ le.vel because. of the diatecce. The school sand lot play area is 'i4J feet from our property and the soccer ERme sideli;ems Start at, 219 feet from o%ir rear prop- erty. This Is the com'rar; son, ".43 feet V5 ( too distance) a outtb our property. This would cri.:ate a IV1I': % .CE, UNhEARABLE SOUND IRRITATION & HAPRASS:�r'?�T to :As local residents. It w.)uld be a loss of rent and ca:lsa a vnc!incy factor forcing us to rent to r,� different ellentel . Our prl vacs, would also be inynded by special children from other locations aQ far away as Wes' ;:71nster, Seal Beach etc. Across from, pub 'ect we also -,Yin 2- 4 plexes which would br-- effected as above noted wy rental loss and Ingress- egress. 2. The unbelievable traffic .genurated ay this facility . Thiw all being propooed to accomwdat.e tnF: :ipeclal: children in a foreign area at the local residents expens:_-. Ref. Is made to Dec. 3J �5 englrjv� ,ring letter snowing bU to 50 trips per day to this facility !+nd at any given time 15 ♦enicles parked at this location. There trips would generate a total of 1720 VMT vehicle mi il.-s travelled. Kngr. also advises In su)ject letter that auout 7Y, of trips wo-tild oo through dell- Silver Lane, and at thle particular intersection there is a right distance problem clue to an i.mbank=Went on 1,11orth East corner. This A• H. F.?. project teas Der!n delaye•l itsdefinately. No mention was made of easterly traffic towarda Beach woleh is hit,ht Turn Only, anott-.er ioott lenerk . A Deg:. 20175 planning starf .Latter vays , "Thin w-)uld furthe, aggravate tht existing traffic problem on Glencoe Ave and ad,lacent streets , '? A Dee. >J' `75 ltr to H . F. iiartge states the pre-school would A1!••ravate the existing traffic proolen and is , t therefore not a{lri:3able. s r 4b Page 2 k ti We also qiestion the validity of thp: hearing, t,/ the favor- itism shown to the apollegnt. After approxlmately one hour elapsed from the time the hearing was publicly closed, this same case was re-o '-enea, w In summ-2z7 as taypayers we would 11 e to mention that a separat., zone be origrinatel for this requiremc^t . This would save akusing and enercaching upon our propr.rty rights which could. be costly in a court action upon the City and other partied neFinoid de la Cuesta ;.arr�t de is Cuesta i I ram. Nuntr� ton ��each Plann�r� nmission • P.O. Box 1o0 CALIFORNIA 92648 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Planning Commission DATE: Febr:nary 10 , 1976 ATTN: David D. Rowlands, City Administrator PE: CONDITIONAL USE PEFAIT NO. 75-22 : APPEAL TO APPROVAL APPELLANT: Reginald and Margarat de la Cuesta 7811 Glencoe Avenue Huntington Beach, California 92648 APPLICANT: Barbara Ann Smith 6052 Glenwood Road Huntington Beach, Calif. 92647 LOCATION: 7791 Glencoe Avenue Huntington Beach Calif. REQUEST: To permit construction of a pro-school. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: ON MOTION LY KERINS AND SECOND BY BAZIL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. — c . 7a 22 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDItJ�S $Y THE FOLLOWING VOTE. AYES : Pari:inson, Bazil , Finley, Boyle , Kerins NOES: Noy;-- ABSENT: Slates, Shea FINDINGS : 1. The proposed plan substantially complies with all applicable provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code . 2. The proposed use as a quasi-public or institutional use is compatible with the adopted land ase designations of the City' s General Plan. 3 . The proposed use is consistent with the City' s Community Facilities objective of "Satisfying the quasi-public needs of the community by encouraging the proper location and planning of such a faci-lity. " • 4b Page Two Conditional Use Permit No. 75-r22 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: i The Planning Commission recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 75-22 for the reasons enumerated above. SUMMARY REPORT Conditional Use Permit No. 75-22 is a request to allow the development of a private pre-school facility on a 13 , 500 square foot panel zoned for residential use. The proposed project consists of remodeling an existing structure and constructing additional floor area to provide a 2400 square foot building . The building is planned to contain four (4) classrooms and two (2) administrative offices. The proposed facility will accommodate a maximum pre-school enrollment of 48 children. The proposed facility is in substantial conformance with the develop- ment standards of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. The issue of the project' s compatibility with existing and future land uses and the concept of planning such a quasi-public institutional use within a residential neighborhood were discussed in the staff report to the Planning Commissicn. i This analysis indicated the advantages: locational convenieace and easy access to the immediate residents; and the disadvantages : traffic and noise generated from the use. The staff conclusions and recom- mendation for approval were based on the mitigating effects that the hours of operation (9 : 00 a .m. to 3 : 00 p.m. ) would accomplish, the willingness of the parents to car pool the children to and from the facility and the commitment the applicant made in the design of the structure to create a residential-like appearance. A detailed discussion of these issues and concerns is contained in the original attached staff report. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The applicant, Airs. Barbara Smith, and La Dorna Lysor addressed the Planning Commission during the public hearing and spoke in favor. Mr. PDger Coulter , Claude Sarrat, Reginald De La Cuesta , Gene E.:win, and Margaret De La Cuesta spoke in opposition citing the smallness of the lot and noise and traffic effects on adjacent residential uses. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : The Environmental Review Board, at its meeting of December 30, 1975 , granted Negative Declaration No. 75-80, having found that the pro- posed project will not have u significant adverse effect upon the physical environment. The Board recommends approval of Negative Declaration No. 73-80 by the City Council . ; . Page Three Conditidnal Use Permit No. 75-22 f I SUPPORTING INFORMATION SUBMITTED: , .. 1. Staff Report 2. Area ,tap 3. Letter of Appear. Res u ly subinitt P hard A. Harlow Secretary RAH:JC: ja . t"M,�1't11111't P1'r'lef 1t It sport TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Department DATE: January 20, 1976 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 7 5-2 2 FILING DATE: 12,/2/7 5 ZONE: R2 APPLIrAN'i. Barbara Ann Smith 6n52 Glenwood Road Huntington Beach , Ca . 92647 .41 I� LOCATION: 7791 Glencoe Avenue .� f... Huntington Beach , Ca . �l •' L W REQUEST: To permit_ cons.ruc t ion of Pre-Schooi . I 1. 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS At its regular :: ,eting of December 30 , 1975 , the Environmental Review Board granted Negative Declaration No. 75-80 with recommendations as outlined in the attached Environmental Review Board transmittal . 2.0 GENEWAL INFORMATION Conditional Use Permiit No. 75-22 is a request to allow the development of a private pre--school facility on a 13 , 500 square foot parcel zoned for residential use. The proposed project consists of remodeling an existing structure and constructing additional floor area to provide a 2400 square foot building. T' building is planned to contain four (4) classrooms and two (2) admi,i.Lutrative offices . Also included in the project is an outdoor play area, off-street parking, landscaping, and miscellaneous • recreational items. According to the applicant , it is anticipated that the proposed facility will accommodate a maximum pre-school enrollment of 48 children on Tuesday and Thursday and 40 children on Mondays , Wednesdays, and Fridays. i EMIROnMEMAL REVIEW BMRD CITY 4F HUNTINGTON BELCH•CALIFORNIA I . P.O. BOX 190 92648 I I. Planning Commission. To: . FROM: Environmental Rev; aw Board DATE: December 30, 1975 SUBJECT: Negative Declaration No. 75-80 (C .U . P . 75-22) r . APPLICANT: Barbara Ann Smith PROJECT: Establishment of a pie-schnol by addition of class- rooms to an existing hu i ld inc; . iLOCATION: i791 Glencoe Avenue, Huntington Beach The Environmental Review Board , at: its meeting of December. 30 , 1975 ranted the above negative declaration, having found that t-hc Ciro-- posed project will not have a significant adverse effect uuon the 'I physical environment. I No environmental impact report has been prel;ared for this project . Findings are based upon the information containpd i;a the negative declaration request form, discussion by this Board , and the follow- ing recommendations: 1 . If the developer proposes to provide air conditioning, the in- sulation in ceilings and exterior walls shall be a minimum of R-19 and R--11 , respectively . If no air conditioning is to be provided, the insulation in ceil i-ncjs and exterior walls shall be a minimum of R-,13 and R-7 , respectively. 2 . All building spoils, such Ts unusable lumhr:•r ,, wire , pipe , and other surplus or unusable rwiteria I , sha 1 1. he disposed of at an offsite facility equipped to handle the-m. 3. Natural gas and 220V electrical shall ho stubbed in at the loca- tion of clothes dryers , and natural clas shall be stubbed in at: the locations of cookinct faci 1 ities , watui heat'tsrs , and central heating units . 4 . An engineering geologist shall be engacie d to submit a report. indicating the ground surface- ac:crl erat i on from earth movement: for the project property. 5. All structures proposed for construct ion within this suibelivi.- sion shall bo constructed in compliance with the o -factors ; as indicates by the, cleologi.st ' tf rirport : NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 75-80 -.December 30 , . '1075 Page 2 6 . Calcula.tions for footings and structural. members to Withstand anticipated g-factors shall be submitted to the City for review. 7. Crime prevention techniques should be applied to the design aspects of the proj�_-t , (e. g. , single-cylinder locks , etc. ) . Helvi'n A. Tooker, Actfng Secretary Environmiental Review Board MATsdf i i i i 1 CITV OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION rK . �.tict�ry�t +c� To Jim Palin From R. R. Leyva Planning Dent. Dept. of Public Works Subject ND 75-80 Barbara Ann Smith, Dace December 30, 1975 Applicant The applicant and an associate met with me regarding the City' s concern of traft'ic gendrated by the development of the pre-school. They emphasized that this development was not a day care center, but a pre-school . The following is information that was supplied to me by the applicant: Hours of-Operation and Attendance Mon. Tugs. Wed. Thurs. Fri . 9: 00 A.M. 48 40 48 40 48 11: 30 r..M. Lunch 12 :00 48 0 48 48 0 3 :00 The applicant stated that some car pooling is being practiced, and that most of the trips would origi�1ate in the western part of the City all the way to Huntington Harbour. it is estimated that an occu- pancy of 1. 6 students per vehicle and a 2 mile average trip length wouli be used to estimate the impact by the tra:..'ic. The trips include those by staff. Mon. Tues . Wed. Thurs . Fri . Trips 250 60 250 230 70 Maximum Vehicles at a Time 35 30 35 35 35 The above trips would generate L. total of 1720 VMT. About 70% of these trips would probably pass through the intersection of Heil Ave. and Silver bane. This particular interx:iection has a sight distance problem because of the embankment en the r.orthaast corner of the inter-- section . Although there is an A ,H.F.P . project to correct this situation, the actual construction will be delayed because of enviroiunental matters. Mitigating Measures.- The number of vehicles arriving at one ti-ne can be reduced by staggering the hours of operation by 30 minutes . Assuming that all Vehicles would arrive within 15 minutes of the starting time, this schedule would generate an average of one vehicle per minute. of I Rn:jy R Rf Ltyvak, �Trl'offlic Engineer _...__ cc: Rick Doolittle 40 December 17, 1975 ' City of Huntington Beach Attn. ENVIRCNUENTAL Rvif.!'1 HC.ARD The undersigned property owners object to the proposed day school. at 7791 Glencoe Ave. , Huntington Beach, Calif. We have numerous reasons 'to present at any future public hearing, ' however at this time we understand that only envivon- mental reasons are requested. The excess noises created by the ehlUren and playygrounc. equipment adjacent to adult apartments and private homes wo,cld make the present land owners suffer. We not only would be subjected to excessive playground noises, but extra traffic on this narrow residential. street. NAME AMe '.PHESS 7f eZ-s,� 4 7 Jr 7/ f f } / az Ir f/ t 14 15 lb 17 18 19 RECEIVED 20 Pl,� F tr 1 fS f � rt R �• i 10 5 17 OA4 � Jar" c� � • 1 ,Cc.•.c.•a.�c�� to ��.�.�. .��.,.�.�:,..,,�,,�.� /'' ,�' � i �L w .7. 3 ' M � N V60A,4, IYV \-Laos cy w r �JIr+U' �Lr�..s�..l;,,/1..�[..�.'r../ �1J �7j'�'� 4/ �.['�T�"t+•�T�1„i v. r Sash 2,15176 NOT= Of PUBLIC SING APPEAL TO APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 75-22 1 NOTICE IS HERM CIVNN that a public hearing vL11 be hold by the • City Council of the City of Huntington beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntiogton Beach, at the hour of 7:00 P.M. , or as Noon th*reafteer as poesiblo, on th* 17th day of Feb _ ary , 19 76 , for the purpose of Considering an appeal to the approval by the City Planning Commission of Conditional Use Permit No. 75-22 to allow the construction of a private school facility for the pro- . school education of children from 3 to 5-1/2 years of age. The facility will consist of approximately five (5) classrooms, ac:ministrative offices, outdoor play areas, off- street parking areas, etc. The school is anticipated to be in operation five (5) days a week between the hours of 9:00 a.m, and 3:00 p.m. The subject property is loccted north of Glencoe Avenue and east of Silver Lana in the R2 Medium Density Residential District. A legal description and copy of the proposed plan is on file in the Planning Department Office. II I All Interested perame twee invited to at-toad said hearing rand express their opiaiow for or against sold J12tial Pirther informtion spy .be obtaiawd from this Office of tau City C to rk. DAM: February z, 1976 CITY 01V MWI10 " BRMN : A icia me Wentworth City Clerk i Number Excerpts 60 t Publish Once LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE Of PUBLIC HEARING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 7 5-2 2 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, California, for the purpose of considering Conditional Use Permit No. 75--22 to allow the construction of a private school facility for the pre-school education of children from 3 to 5- 1/2 yours of age. The facility will consist of ,approximately f iv�a (5) classrooms, administrative offices, outdoor play areas off-street parking areas, etc. The school is anticipated to be in operation five (5) daye a week between the hours of 9 : 00 a.m. and 3 : 00 p.m. The subject property is located north of Glencoe Avenue and east of Silver Lane in the R2 Medium Density Residential Diat.rict. A legal description and copy of the proposed plan is on file in the Planning Department Office . I Said hearing will be held at the hour of 7 : 00 P .M. , on January 6, 1975 , in the Council Chamber Building of the Civic Center , 2000 Main Street , Huntington Beach , California. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for ov against the proposed Conditional Use Perinit No. 75--22 Furzher information may bo obtained from the City Planning Department . Telephone No . (714) S36-SZ71 DATED this loll d a y of I&&MG CITE' PLANNING COMMISSION ,2 e..# 'Ry- Richsrd A. Hnr.low sa�cretary Barbara Ann -Smith xWft*Y2 "x 142-102--12 I052 Glenwood Rd xnaawvo,X�c�tm Eleanor C. Ebert Huntington Reach, Calif 7862 Glencoa Avenue 92647 Huntington Beach, Cal 92647 142-101-1 142--102--13 community Church CUP # 75-22 Ernest R. Moen Assembly of God AP 's typed by Jana It . 6842 Oxford Drives 7751 Glencoe Avenue Huntington Beach, Cali, Nwitingtca Beach, Calif 92647 142-191--02 1.42--102--0.1 142-102-30 1w L Ervin Theodore West Joseph Capocci.am a 7 E Glencoe Avenue 7752 Glencoe Avenue 19232 Beach Blvd. H ting•ton Beach, Cal.{f Huntington Teach, Calif Iuntington Beach, Calif 9 647 92647 92647 1 101-03 142-102-05 142-1.02--31 Frank n Schooley Reba E. Coulter Bernie E Kayn 7 Glencoe Avenue 7792 Glencoe Avenue 7837 Alhambra Avenue �i ngton Beach, Calif Huntin .4ton Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif g 6 7 92647 92647 2 1OX-04 142--102-06 142-102033 nasal De Lai Cuesta Charles E. Erwin Ralph J Williams 7811 Glencoe Avenue #1 A.-101 Rosalino Drive 7823 Alhambra Drive ington Beach , Calif Santa Ana, Calif 92706 Huntington Beach, Calif 6 7 92647 2-101-05 142--102-07 142- 102--34 ns H Reti�+ rsxExxltsxt�cx F D Allaweeck i 41 Glencoe Avenue Unv 7811 E. Alhambra Avenue Huntington Bench , Calif Huntington Beach, calif f 6 7 92647 1 101.-06 142-102--08 142-102-35 C ence H Shaw Robert E . Laurie M area Reisfield 16192 Feiray Lmn© Llwyne R Greene I! Fullerton ,4 9 Oliva Huntington Reach , Calif gull �, Calif lAksw►ood, Calif 90712 92647 Full 22 633 142--101-07 142--102--04 142"3.02~'36 Carl H. Hardin Lynn Pryor Setero Diaz 7791 Alhambra Drive 7871 Glencoa Avenue 7952 Rhone Drive Huntington Beach, Cali•.' Huntington Beach , Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92647 92647 92647 142-101.-08 1.42-102--10 142-102-38 Jru as R. Tolen Dale Williams Virgil Cowing 2553 Pe►talumv Street 7842 Glencoa: Avenue 77,51 Alhambra Avenue Lone Beach , Cal:,f Huntington Beach , Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92 6 4 90815 92647 142r-101-09 1.42--102-11 142-102-•39 Donn R. Parecii Hadley H. Udatrom Erroim nesiz 61.7 15th Street 7952 Glencoe Avenun 721 Utina Street Huntington Beach , Calif Huntington Leach, Calif Huntington Heach , Calif 92648 92647 92648 1 • 4 °'► •142-102-40 -142- 203--08 Rodger L. Wallace • Sylvia J Smith. George "Iishicka 16411 Silver Lane S 10271 Aqueduct Drive 651iNatncy Drive Huntington Beach, Cal Cypress , Calif Huntington ngton Beach, Calif 42647 142- 283 90630 92647 283..19 - 142--1Q2--41 1.42--283-09 X42"' Robert J Mason Norris Croft Otix K Wheeler 5405 Wilma Street M671 Nancy Drive 16391 Silver Land Torrance, Calif7671 Nancyngton Heath , calif Huntington Beach, Cali, 90505 Hunt92647 92647 142-102--43 142•-283--10 81t4x9itax" d C tall Gerrard Drri fort Alha►zabrx Avenue 7681 Nancy Drive Wntington Beach, CalifW'jr Huntington Beach , Calif FWL92647 @111-27 142-283--11 142-283-20 Ocean View School Distr, Frmd M Hirst Stanley D. Smith Z1 Beach Blvd 1638:� ';drk Lane 16381 Silver Lane ing►ton Reach, Calif Huntington Beach , Calm Huntington Beach, Calif 2 7 92647 92647 4 295--09 142-283--12 142- 283-21 a er A Lennertz Jay C. Strang Alvin H Hart F.O. Box 1266 16392 Mark Lane 16371 Silver Lane F42-295-10 ington Beach, Calif Huntington Seach , Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 7 92647 52647 142-283-13 Dept. of transpo�:tation aret M I�nacsk Donald L Dreager12A 30. Spring 8tteat Juliette Low Drive 16412 Mark Lane Los Angeles , Calif 90052 Huntington Beach , Calif Huntington Jeac:h, Calif Attn : Staff Assistant 2 7 92647 Design d YM2 295--11 142•-283--18 �txSxx xxx�q�at ` ael L Uptegraff William C. McMahan "in X tlklrx8t smaix Julietto Low Drive 16422 !Sark LaneItlti�tlakugk�tx�s�racligcx�.tt�tx ington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach.. Cali E XttXXX j&jftA kX I 92647 92647 142-295-12 142--283r-15 H.B. union Hi h School Mlph E Bridges Sr g Elroy C. ncunas 7712 Juliette Low Drive 16432 Hark I-%ne 1902 - 17th Street Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 92647 92647 Attn : G'istrict Supt. 142--295-13 142--201 -16 xlie J Norton John A Rleinbach 16361 Silver Lana 21002 ocean16 Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington AeAch, Calif 92647 92648 142-283--17 Leo F... Appel 16421 Silver Lane F:.:ntington Beach , Calif 92647 90 ;t a City Of Huntington Beach P.O. Box 190 CALIFORNIA ISM OFFICE. OF THE CITY CLERK I I February 25 1976 i i Mrs. Barbara Ann Smith 6052 Glenwood Road Huntington Bench, California 92647 i Dear dire. Smith: The City Council of the City of Huntington Bea-' at its meeting held February 17, 1976 overruled the Planning Commission and approved the appeal which had been filed to approval of your application for Conditional Use Permit 4-75-22. If you have any further questions on the matter, or if we may be of assist- ance, please don't hesitate to contact thin office. Sincerely yours, Alicia R. Wentworth City Clerk ANW:CB:t l o