Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Use Permit 76-12 - JAMES A. CARTER - 193 Unit Apartment Comp
qq F7 , Affidavit c Publication Site of Callfornin Co,tnty of Orange 1 ss City of Huntington BenchAr George Farquhar, being duly sworn on oath, says: That he is a � I" citizen of the United States, over the age of twenty-one years. That he is the printer and publisher of the Huntington Beach clews, a weekly newspaper of general circulation printed and pub- Ushed in Huntington Beach, California anti circulated In the said Q County of Orange and elsewhere and published for the dissemination of local and other news of a general character, and has a bona fide subscription list of paying sub.crlbers, and salt; paper has been established, printed and published in the State of California, and County of Orange, for at least one year next before the publication of the first insertion of this notice; and the salt] newspaper is not devoted to the interest of, or published for the entertainment of any �.:.... .. particular class, profession, trade, calling, race or denomination, or = any number thereof. P,.#tisRard Nunttn�tesn�Efoaclt 21. 1916: y .r.;,,.... , ,.,..;.. The Huntington Beach New was adjudicated a legal newspaper of general circulation by Judge G. K. Scovel in the Superior Court NOTICE Of 1�U MCARING of Orange County, California August 27th, 1937 by order No. A-5931. APPEISL.TCl .r.!?F t40TICE it1 k V.'otvtt 'e'pub` APPEAL TO DENIAL. OF T_, Ili..homing, h. ' bll st,:;trlty� That the Gounatl ut lhei City of:NWoA- rCi,Iin Ins the-Cour+C1 ti�bnt ;tt�;,.rX USE PEN2�:IT 76-12 t:enter, .huntIV4 :'bk:16K 114-' ' of which the annexed is a printed copy, was published in said ne«•s- polslLgk on Mi,�+ of 04 7th,e9+lr:al.lfen' lelc-.roc thi6 gsa- ;gttiktlsSIn 'Ppezi to tlla'de+ll�t:tyl;thl;CtiQl: l1n paper at least —one 1 a a lie — -- line.Ccmcai�iton:'ot,uss:t�rtnit ty�oc �t to nrimit tite.�ycnittticttvci.e14 � Dp$rtRMif}t�Complat��rDtalnt'•to:'t1 i commencing from the 2 th day of NAy _ 9:n�.�bC the.11ipitl' M daeall e' ' CO,.'e+ ThR,a:sbl+cl-P�►rrooppoarty.J6:'* �on3 t:1a•kruth.eid:ofi sh. 1 C,*".Frrarwey. ert,4tk+ east end:ot.:9er►:Anoci_Drlra In 19.�.-.- and ending an the 27th day of _..U@ —�-- _�� trytr,�7.1�Mebtum 14iih, Dir�tty-#teslc'etMIn oishfutl:*A''401 �r�G"1s►ttvn: tt s 6n 1t1� tt.,iMi,•�}Janrt}1�t!�Le7!Mttrtarh. f,,. 1926, both days inclusive, and as often during said pericxi and kii*ls ktei.,;►'• .:ta times of publication as uid paper was regularly issue:], and i:. the sn° = q �Ar 1ng ' ti.�_x4p�r�!. `ttle�r, gWR10rw1'roc pr 1�elttat sell;iFptet. regular and entire issue of said pewspaper proper, and not Ina jty `l , svn`may'be'e>'btatneif supplement, and said notice was published therein on the following hod th :tfiflC+i!'esf 'Cr dates, to-wit: W►TtfDc 1rNfi"11,U slfti:' t h�� May 27 , 1276--- — pails ot`.:�+Ur+r%ti�irolwt c� Qyt M;` „•,... . Clty.Gerk ,r- Publisher Subscrihtd rind sworn to before me this 28th -- day of May t •�n %�� lvotnty Public Orange County, California ----------------------------------V • THOMAS D. WYLLI � �~i Nalary Pudl�r-C�I�ior�i• p Oran98 Corntf .� My Comonhs;on Espirss .. .. ........ ... . . .. .. . .. .. . . .. • r &AE D)NGER 1 ?3 C2 4. i 1600 �. t > W STARK AVE f13 �e j S� }�__�__� f V1 } Z a 1000 4 GAL[ s+ rz[T i !� Use Permit No. 76-12 , ��, .•er.rn..�o.aF.cw-. ,i J • • low '••• i 'i'i • • /�. IN fELrT SCALE " • "" F3y UBJECT . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. • • • •• ♦• • w f •• • • •• • s• • • • • a • s • • s • • • ITE •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• •r w � • • a •4 • .s s• •s s • • • 0 '• ••'i i'•iliiiiiiiiiiiiii• •• • • • s • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • � ii • as♦ s•i i•isiif•ii'•ii'•i i••i••i i • • • •• ••• •• • • • s • • •1 • • • • • •. • • • •• •• • •f • • • • • • •• • • •• W 1-0 COMMERCIAL PLANNING RESERVE J MEDIUM DENSITY s 1. GENERAL PLAN LMD USE DES I GMT I4N � �► MVrfarGlt7f MAC" �� IM- huntirrgtx� b ►.,.. xung �rtt►x�d�nt staff own-M-6---.rep ort- TO: PLANTING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: APRIL 20 , 1976 USE PERMIT NO. 7 6-12 (REFFFJW BY BZA) APPLICANT: James A. Carter ZOY;E: R-3 121 Royal Oak Rd. Anaheim, Ca. LOCATION: South side of San Diego Freeway at east end of San Angelo Dr. REQUEST: To permit the construction of 193 unit apartment complex i 1. 0 GENERAL INFORMATION: Use Permit 76--12 , filed on February 18 , 1976 , is a request to permit the construction of a 193--unit apartment complex on a 7 . 769 acre parcel of land located on the south side of the San Diego Freeway at the east end of San Angelo Drive , on the southeast side of Edinger Avenue and Beach Boulevard . I The Board of Zoning Adjustments originally reviewed Use Permit 76-12 at its March 17 , 1976 , meeting and after a lengthy discussion referred it to the April 20 Planninq Commission meetinq at the request of the applicant, as there had been requests by property owners in the area for a night meeting. Referral was also made because the original. plan submitted to the Board had little chance of approval without revision , as the s:*Lte plan was not in compliance with Article 932 (Apartment Standards) on requirements such as assigned parking , walking distance to parking spaces , and open space for five: of the second story units . 2. 0 JANL USE AND ZONING : Subject property is zoned R3 , Medium Family Residential , and is vac;.nt � at th_s time . This property was purchased by the State for the 39 Freeway interchange at the time when the property to the south was being developed into an apartment complex. The property is bounded on the north by the Sii% Diego Freeway. The property located along the southerly tip of the pLoposed project is zoned R1 and developed with single--family dwellings . These homes are .located within the City of Westminster. ��i...urr�a..n r■wrrrrra Use Permit 76--12 ` - Page 2 The , properties along the southwest and west boundaries of subject property are zoned R3 and developed as an apartment complex, as well as apartments on individual lots . 3 . 0 GENERAL PLA*l: The Land Use Element of the General Plan has subject property designated • provisions for property to be as , a planning reserve, which sets forth provisa. n P P Y developed pursuant to the existing zoning on the property. 4 . 0 ENVIRONbMNTAI, STATUS : On March 91 1976, the Environmental Review Board granted Negative Declaration 76-11, having found that the project will not have a significant adverse effect upon the physical environment. The Environ- mental Review Board' s recortmendat ions to minimize the impact of accumulative developments of this nature in this general vicinity are attached herewith in its transmittal. 5. 0 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The Planning staff has had a number of meetings with the applicant subsequent to Board review and referral to the Commission. It should. be and � noted that although the plan a request still is for a 193-unit development, the plan has been revised to eliminate the 435 foot walking distance from parking to some units , to provide double the amount of open space, to provide private open space for all units, to orient all units to open areas , to assign all covered parking , and. to redesign both access entries to the project. The applicant vas also to have had an additional traffic study taken in the area for rc:view by the City. 6 . 0 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS : (Revised plan dated April 12 , 1976) Gross Acreage: M 338 , 058 sq. ft. Net Acreage: 298 , 000 sq. ft. t;,.:its per g!:oss acre: Permitted : 24 . 89 Proposed : 24 . 89 Total Units : 193 Floor Area. and Type of Unit: Type "A" 50 Single 505 sq. ft. /unit Type "B" 65 1 Br. 712 sq. ft. /unit Type "A-F" 78 2 Br. 1010 - 1070 sq. ft. /unit Open Space : Total Required : 45 , 850 sq. ft. Total Proposed : 95 , 000sgft. I Site Coverage : Permitted: 50%gross/ac._ Proposed : 40% • ,' . Use Permit 76-12 i Page 3 7. 0 RECOMMENDATION: In view of the above information, and if the Planning Commission concurs with the request after finding that the project at the density as proposed is in compliance with the General Plan, that the complex has sufficient access for its size and location and that the proposal will not adversely affect the low- and medium-density residential property to the south and southwest, the Staff offers the following conditions of approval for your consideration: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The conceptual plot plan and elevations received April 14 , 1976 shall be the approved layout. 2 . Landscape and irrigation plan complying with Article 979 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code and landscaping specifications on file in the Department of Public Works shall be submitted 4o the Department of Building and Community Development for approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 3 . Soil and compaction reports shall be submitted by a certified soils engineer . Said reports shall be submitted to the Department of Building and Community Development and shall be subject to approval by that Department. 4 . Fire protection systems, including automatic sprinkler systems , standpipe systems , fire hydrants , fire alarm systems and any other required fire protection and detection devices or systems shall comply with the specifications of the Huntington Beach Fire Code. Plans for such systems and devices shall be submit-nd t� the Fire Department and shall subject to approval by the Departments of Fire and Public Works . i 5 . The developer shall participate in the local drainage assessment district . 6. The developer shall participate in the Orange County Sanitation District #3 Sewer Annex District. 7 . All applicable fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. Use Permit 76-12 Page 4 8 . If the developer proposes to provide air conditioning, the insulation in ceilings and exterior walls shall be a minimum of R-19 and R-11 , respectively. If no air conditioning is to be provided, the insulation in ceilings and exterior walls shall be a minimum of R-13 and R-7 , respectively, 9• All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire , pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an offsite facility equipped to handle them. 10 . Natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at the loc- ation of clothes dryers , and natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities , water heaters, and central heating units . 11 . The recommendation of the traffic consultant, limiting access on Wells Road to emergency vehicles only, should be incorporated into the project design. 12 . All recommendations made on noise control by the applicant' s noise consultant should be incorporated into the project design. JMC:gC I Page #5 - Council M s - 5/3/76 Councilmsi± Bartlett, requested and was granted permission to abstain from voting on the matter due to a possible conflict of interest. Mayor Wieder declared the hearing open. There being no one present to speak on the matter and there being no protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor. On motion by Pattinson, second Shenkmau, Council approved Code Amendment No. 75-1 by the following vote: AYES: Pattinson, Coen, Wieder, Gibbs, Siebert, Shenlmian NOES. Nonc. ABSENT.': Bartlett The Clerk was directed to give Ordinance No. 2060 a first reading by title "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY REPEALING SECTE014S 9481.. 161 9481.17, 9482. 10 9482.31 9482.47 9482.59 9482.6, 9482.71 9482.89 9482.9, AND 9'+82. 10; AND BY AMENDING AND ADDING CERTAIN SECTIONS, ALL PERTAINING TO SERVICE STATION STANDARDS IN SAID CITY." On motion by Pattinson, second Shenkman, Council waived further reading Ordinance No. 2060 by the following vote: AYES: Pattinson, Coen, Vieder, Gibbs, Siebert, Shenlcnar. NOES: None ABSENT: Bartlett: PUBLIC HEARING - RES OF INTENT 4203 - HEARING OF PROTESTS - WEED ABATEMENT Mayor Wieder announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing on Resolution of Intent No. 4203 of the City Council dec.laring a nuisance to exist; in the form of weeds. The Clerk presented the notice of public hearing on Resolution No. 4203 of the City Council, as Frosted conspicuously along all the streets and property within the , district described in said Resolution, setting the hour of 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible, on Monday, the . . day of May, 1976, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach. California, as the time and place for a public hearing on a declaration that a nuisance exists and providing for the abatement thereof. The' Clerk informed the Council that she had received no coumunications or written Protests to Resolution No. 4203 of the City Council proposing to abate the geed nuisance, and presented the Affidavit of Posting of Notice to Destroy Weeds which had been executed by the Streat Superintendent. Mayor Wieder declared the hearing open. Mi. McCloud, Villa t1obile dome Park, addressed Council. regarding the procedure for the assessment and the Director of Public Werks clarified the matter. There being no one further present to speak on the matter and there being no protnats filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor, r. Page #6 - Council Minutes - 0#6 On motion by Bartlett, second Siebert, Council authorized the Street Superintendent to proceed with the abatement of the weed nuisance in the City. The motion was passed by the following roll tali vote: AYES: Bartlett, Pattinson, Coen, Wieder. , Gibbs, Siebert, Shenkman NOES: None ABSENT: None RESOLUTIONS tDOPTED On motion by rattinson, second Shenkman, Council directed the Clerk to read Resolution Nos. 4228, 4230, 4231 , 4232, 4235 and 4236 by title; waived further reading and adopted same by the following roll call vote: AYES: Bartlett, Pattinson, Coen, Wieder, Gibbs, Siebert, Shenkm ,:, NOES: None ABSENT: None RESOLUTION NO. 4228 - ADOPTED - ESTABLISHES CHARGES - PUBLIC RECORDS "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ESTABLISHING CHARGES TO BE LEVIED BY CITY OFFICES FOR PUBLISHING COPIES OF PUBLIC RECORDS AND REPEALING 1- SOLUFION NO. 4212. " RES. NO. 4230 - ADOPTED - CONTROL OF MOSQUIT-) BREEDING - US NAVAL WEAPONS STATION" "A r%ESOLUTION OF THE. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY W HUNTINGTON BEACH PROTESTING RE-ESTABLISRHENT OF SALT MARSHES WITHOUT PROPER ENGINEERING TO CONTROL MOSQUITO BREEDING ON THE UNITED SFATL'S NAVAL WEAPONS STATION Al SEAL BEACH. " i RES. NO. 4231 - ADOPTED - FEES - USE OF CITY BUILDINGS & PARTICI'ATION IN RECREATIONAL FACILITIES "A RESOLUTION Or' THE C1'I'Y COUNCIL, OF THE: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH APPROVING THE NEW FEE SCHEDULE DL7ERMINED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF RECREATION, PARKS AND HITMAN SERVICES FOR UCE OF CITY BUILDINGS AND PARTICIPATION IN RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES. " RES. NO. 4232 - .ADOPTED - ACCEPTS GRA34T OF EASEMENT - 3PRR - ELLIS AVENUE "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ACCEPTING GRANT OF EASEMENT AND AVl'HORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT TO CONSTRUCT GRADE SEPARATION, AND DITtECTING CITY CLERK TO FILE SAME.. RES. NO. 4235 - ADOPTED REQUEST ASSISTANCE IN COST OF DREDGING IN HUNTINGTON HARBOUR "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 110- 'INGTON BEACH REQUESTING ASSISTANCE FROM ENVIRONMENTAL MANaGEMENr AGENCY OF ORANGE COUNTY IN THE COST OF DREDGING IN RMINGTON HARBOUR. " RES._N0. 4236 - ADOPTED - 1U{FP BOLSA CHICA., ElYdARDS TO GOLDENWEST "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUESTING THE COLRITY OF ORANGL II'n YNCREASE THEIR AI.IOC kTi0N FROM ARTERIAL. HIGHWAY FINANCING PROGRMI FOR THE DEVE1.01IN[:UT *OF BOL.SA AVENUE FROM EDWARfl` S'ITEFT TO GOLDENVEST STREET. " Page #7 - Council Minutes - 5/3/76 REQUEST TO ADDRESS COUNCIL - MAYOR AL HOLLINDEN - RES. N0. 4233 - ADOPTED URGES SUPPORT OF AB 2752 Mayor Al Hollinden, Mayor of the City of Fountain Valley and member of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Transit District, addressed Council regarding the communication received from the Orange County Transit District scheduled under the "Written Communications" portion of the agenda urging the City Council support of Assembly Bill 2752 (Public Transportation Requirements) . He requested that Council take action to support Assembly Bill 2752. The City Clerk was directed to give Resolution No. 4233 a reading by title - "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH URGING SUPPORT OF AB�2752�(RiBLIC 7}AANSP AT ORTS6 N R EQUIREriTrNT5) ." On motion by Shenkman, second Gibbs, Council waived further re.3c:ing of Resolution No. 4233 and adopted same by the following roll call vote: AYES: Bartlett, Pattinson, Coen, Wieder, Gibbs, Siebert, Shenlmnan NOES: None ABSENT: None i ARMED FORCES CARAVAN I r I Mr. Joe Whaling, representing the Huntington Beach Bicentennial Commission, invited the Cc►uncil and audience to view the Armed Farces Bicentennial Caravan at City Hall on May 9, 1976. REQUEST TO ADDRESS COUNCTL - THOMAS WH ALTNG w y irw t Mr. Thomas Whaling, member of the Project Area Committee, addressed Council regarding the agenda item pertaining to Bylaws and Guidelines for the Project Area Committee Activities. He requestej that Council ask that the firm of VTN be present during their meeting scheduled for May 6, 1976. Councilman Coen brought Mr. Whaling's attention to a letter dated April 6, 1976 received from CTN relative to their program and discussion was held between the Council, City Administrator, Planning Director, 3d Mr. Whaling. Mayor Wieder designated Councilmen Bartlett and Pattinson to attend the Project Area Con ni.ttee. meeting. Mr. Whaling also stated that he believed the agenda items pertaining to the Bo.lsa Chica Study Committee report and the Huntington Beach Chamber of Cormnerce Resolution relative to the Coastal Commission the California Coastal Plan should be discussed at Town Hall meetings. RE UEST TO ADDRESS COUNCIL - DONNA PAUP Mrs. Donna Paup, 17171 Bolsa Chica Street, address Council regarding the drainngc assessment ordinance in industrial areas, in connection with the relocation of stables on her property. Mrs. Paup was referred to the City Atto*ney's office for assistance in the matter. Page #8 - Council Minutes - 176 • REgUEST TO ADDRESS COUNCIL - STEVE PRESSLEY fir. Steve Pressley, Huntington Beach Fourth of July Parade Coordinator addressed Council and presented a copy of a resolution adopted by the California Senate declaring the Huntington Beach Fourth of July Parade as the State's official Bi-centennial parade. BOLSA CHICA STUDY COMMITTEE REPORT DEFEIIRED The City Clerk presented a communication from the Secretary of the Bolsa Chica Study Committee, t:ansmitting their final report to the City Council. A communication from Gretchen iioad, Attorney for the Amigos de Bo lsa chica was also presented. Following discussion regarding the time which Council should hear the report, on motion by Bartlett, second Pat.tinson, Council deferred cl3nsideration of the Bolsa Chica Study Committee report to a later portion of. the Council ,.-,�eting and designated May 24, 1976 as the date that Council would meet with the committee: to reviaw said report. The motion was passed by the following vote: AYES: Pattinson, Coen, Wieder, Shunkman, Bartlett NOES: Gibbs, Siebert ABSENT: None PROPOSED MORATORIUM ON A "PLANNING RESERVE" PARCEL ADJACENT TO SD FWY - PROPOSED EMERGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 2061 - TABLED The City Clerk presented a communication from the Planning Conrlission transmitting proposed Emergency Ordinance No. 2061 which would place a three month moratorium cn the issuance of building permits on certain real property east of San Angelo Drive and south of the San Diego Freeway. A communication from Mr. James A. Carter regarding the matter had also been transmitted to Council. The Planning Director reported on the intent of the proposed ordinance. Councilman Shenkman presented reasons why he opposed the enactment of moratorium on property. The Planning Director reported on the history of the property. Mr. James A. Carter addressed Council regarding his proposed project to be located on the south side of the San Diego Freeway at the east end of San Angelo Drive. A motion was made by Coen, second Bartlett, to adopt proposed Emergency Ordinance No. 2061 after a reading in full by the Cleric. Mr., Rot► Kelly, addressed Council and presented an informal petition listing approximately 185 signatures of City of Westminster residents opposed to Mr. Carter's application for a Use Permit on this property. He presented photographs of the area to the Council and gave reasons why he opposed the proposed project. Mr. Gordor, Kramer, representing the Huntington Villa Property Owners Association, addressed Council and stated that he had presented an informal petition to the Board of Zoning Adjustments in opposition to Mr. Carter's project. page #9 - Council "nutes - 5/3/76 Following discussion the motion made by Coen, second by Shenkman, was withdrawn. A motion was made by Councilwoman Gibbs, second Pattinson the t proposed Emergency Ordinance No. 2061 be tabled indefinitely. The motion was passed by the following vote: AYES: Bartlett, Pattinson, Coen, Wieder, Gibbs, Siebert NOES: Shenkman ABSENT: None Mayor Wieder suggested that Mr. Carter and those people who addressed Council make an appointment: with the Planning Director to discuss the matter. RES. NO. 4237 - ADOPTED - BYLAWS & GUIDELINEE FOR PROJECT AREA COMMITTEE ACTIViTILS The City Clerk presented a communication from the Project Area Committee transmitting A Working Document For Citizen Participation in Development which sets forth the relationships of the Project Area Committee to the Planning Commission, City Council, Redevelopment Agency and Staff and recommending that: Council adopt Resolution No. 4237 1 approving and ratifying Bylaws. The Clerk was directed to give Resolution No. 4237 i a reading by title - "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Or. HUNTINGTON BACK APPROVING AND RATIFYING BYLAWS AND GUIDELINES FOR THE PROJECT AREA COMMITTEE." i On motion by Coen, second Gibbs, Council waived further reading of Resolution No. 4237 And adopted same by the following roll call vote: AYES: Bartlett, Pattinson, Coen, Wieder, Gibbs, Siebert NOES: None ABSENT: Shenkman COMMUNICATION - DESIGN REVIEW BOARD - MEADOWLARIC GOLF COURSE - (CR 76-6) DRB RECOMMENDATION DISAPPROVED •The Clerk presented a communication from the Design Review Board regarding their action on the request of Mr. Hugh Snyder, operator of Meadowlark Golf Course, to provide a six foot high chain link fence along the southerly property line of Meadowlark Golf Course. A conanunicati.on from Mr. Snyder regarding the mutter was also presented. Fallowing discussion between the Council and staff, a motion was made by Shenkman, second Coen, to disapprove the recommendation of the Design Review Board. Th.�•.. .. motion was passed by the following vote: AYES: Bartlett, Pattinson, Coen, Wieder, Gibbs, Siebert, Shenlanan NOES: None ABSENT: None ORDINANCES ADOPTED On motion by Gibbs, second Coen, Council directed the Clerk to give Ordinance Hos. 2053, 20549 2065 and 2058 a second reading by title; waived further reading and adopted same by the following roll call vote: AYES: Bartlett, Pattinson, Coen, Wieder, Gibbs, Siebert, Shenkman ?TOES: None AB SENT": None 1 Page 1110 - Council Minutes - 76 ORD. NO. 2053 - ADOPTED - ZONE CASE 76-01 "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE. CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 9061 THEREOF TO PROVIDE FOR CHANGE OF ZONING ON REAL PROPERTY LOCATED 014 THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ADMIRALTY DRIVE. AND PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY (ZONE CASE NO. 76-00 . " ORD. NO. 2054 - ADOPTED - ZONE CASE 76-014 "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CIT'. OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 9061 THEREOF TO PROVIDE FOR CHANGE OF ZONING ON REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST COR14ER OF FLORIDA ,STREET A?T0 CLAY AVENUE (ZONE CASE NO. 76-04) . " ORD. NO. 2056 - ADOMD - ADDS NEW ARTICLE 936 "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY ADDINC NEW ARTICLE 9369 ENTITLED, "MEDItTM/HIGII DENSITY PLANKED RESIDENTIAL, CONDOMINIUM OR COMMUNITY APARTMENT DEVELOPMENTS". ORD. N0. 2058 - ADOPTED - ESTABLISHES SELF-INSURER'S LOSS FUND TRUSTEE ACCOUNT "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUN'PINGTON BEACH MUNICIPAL li CODE BY ADDING THERETO SECTION 2. 72. 110 ESTABLISHING A SELF-INSURER'S LOSS FUND TRUSTEE f ACCOUNT." ORDINANCES FIRST READING I On motion by Coen, second Pattinson, Council directed the Clerk to read ordinance Nos. 2057 and 2059 by title; and waived further reading of same by the following vote.- AYES: Bartlett, Pattinson, Caen, Wieder, Gibbs, Siebert, Shenkman NOES: None ABSENT: None ORD. NO. 2057 - FIRST READING - AMENDS CODE PERTAINING TO THE LIBRARY "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTOIJ BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE BY REPEALING CHAPTERS 2.88 AND Z.92 THEREOF IN THEIR ENTIRETY, AND REPEALING SECTIONS 2.84.050 AND 2.84.060 AND AMENDING SECTIONS 2.84.010 AND 2.84.020 THEREOF, ALL PERTAINING TO THE LIBRARY." i ORD. 140. 2059 - FIRST READING - AMENDS CODE PERTAINING TO BICYCLES i i "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE BY REPEALING SECTIONS 10.84.025 AND 10.84.070 AND AMENDING SECTIONS 10.84.005, 10.84.010, 10.94.015, 10.84.0309 10.84.060, 10.84.270 AND 10. 94.280 THEREOF, PERTAINING TO BICYCLES." • Page #11 - Council M"nutes - 5/3/76 GAS TAX PROJECT - INDUSTRIAL PARK - (CA 76-56) AND (CA 7�6-56A) Vie City Clerk presented a communication from the City Administrator dated April 23, 1976, recommending that the City immediately proceed with a project to complete the street work on Springdale Street, Graham Street, Bolsa Avenue and McFadden Avenue which could be financed with Gas Tax Funds. A supplemental. City Administrator communication dated April 29, 1976 wa;; also presented to Council recommending that they adopt a policy whereby the City, in regard to off-site and other improvement costs, may be able to provide assistance through the installation of Public Works improvements to actual development, thereby reducing the site preparation costs. A motion was made by Bartlett, second Shenkman to approve the proposed Gas Tax Project in the Industrial Area; authorize the Director of Public Works to prepare the plans and specifications and advertise for bids and further, adopt the recommended policy in regard to off-site and other improvement costs. The motion was passed by the following vote: AYES: Bartlett, Pattinson, Coen, Gibbs, Siebert, Shenkman, Wieder. NOES: Noae ABSENT: None COMMUNICATION - DOUG THOMPSON - BAND NAME - RECEIVED AND FILED The City Clerk presented a communication frcm Doug Thompson advising Council that the new name of the City-sponsored Music Man Band will be "The All American Sound Machine," with "The Sound Machine" being the main part of the name. The Council directed that said communication be received and filed. I, COMMUNICATION - JERWEL ENTERFRISES - PURCHASE OF SURPLUS PROPERTY The CityClerk resented a communication from Jerwel Enterprises San Dimas p Enterprises, > California, regarding their proposed purchase of surplus City property located southerly of McFadden Avenue and northerly of their project (The North Huntington Center Specific Plan). Mr. Earl. Welk, representing Jerwel Enterprises addressed Council regarding matters pertaining to their proposed purchase of surplus city property. On motion by Gibbs, second Shenlanan, Council approved the sale of surplua property located southerly of McFadden Avenue and northerly of said project, to Jerwel Enterprises at a cost reflecting the administrative title transfer costs with the condition that the street be maintained perpetually open to the public. The motion was passed by the following vote: AYES: Bartlett, Pattinson, Wieder, Gibbs, Siebert, Shenkman NOES: Coen ABSENT: None TALBERT LAKE PUMP REPLACEMENT APPROVED - (CA 76-57) The City Clerk presented a communication from the City Administrator reconnending that Council approve the •replacement of the three pumps at Talbert lake in Huntington Central Park at an approximate cost of $16,650. I Page #12 - Council Minutes "- P3/76 on motion by Gibbs, second Shenkman, Council. approved the replacement of the three pumps a..t Talbert Lake in Hunting--on Central Park at an approximate cost of $16,85O to be derived from the Contingency Fund. The motion was passed by the following vote: AYES: Bartlett, Pattinson, Coen, Wiener, Gibbs, Siebert, Shenkman NOES: None ABSENT: None It was determined by Council that a meeting between the proposed lessees and the Council. would be scheduled for an adjourned regular Council rweting to be called for 'Tuesday, May 4, 1976. ;JOWNTOWN PARKING Councilwoman Gibbs spoke regarding a letter she had received from a downtown resident regarding the possibility of obtaining a sticker so that they cuuld park in front of their residences without paying parking meters. It was determined that this matter would be handled administratively. CHARTER REVISION COMMITTEE ITEMS f Councilman Shenkman requested that at such time as the Charter Revision Committee is formed that the Council discuss with them revisions to the Charter to make the positions of City Attorney, City Treasurer and City Clerk appointive and that terms of City Council members be limited to two consecutive terms. BILL BOARD COMMITTEE APPOINTED Mayor Wieder commented on a communication from the City Attorney relative a forthcoming meetingregarding ending bill board litigation. She appointed Councilmen Pattinson and R B pending g pP C s Bartlett and Councilwoman Gibbs to serve on a Council committee on this subject. AD HOC COW41TTEE TO REVIEW CITY COUNCIL BUDrET d EXPENDITURES APPOINTED Mayor Wieder appointed Councilmen Coen and Pattinson to serve on a Council Ad Hoc Committee with the City Attorney to review City Council expenditures and fringe benefits for report back to Council no later than May 17, 1976. PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED RE: PUBLIC INPUT FOR 1976-77 CITY BUDGET Mayor Wieder announced that a public hearing would be held Monday, ,day 10, 1976 for the purpose of so U citing public input for the 1976-77 City budget. POLICY FOR EXECUTIVE SESSIONS Mayor Wieder announced that following the May 10, 1976 public hearing for citizen input on the 1976-77 city budget, an Executive Session would be held to discuss the stratus of the City Administrator. She stated that a policy was to be adopted by the: City Council whereby Executive Scosions would not be held unless noted on the Council agenda. Page #13 - Council Minutes - 5/3/76 CITY COUNCIL APPOINVEN'I'S 'Mayor Wiedcc made the following City Council appointments: Orange County League of Cities Mayor Winder. Councilman Pattinson — Alternate Orange County Sanitation District #3 yYYiY��i M fir T�i � Mayor Wieder Councilman Pattinson - Alternate I West Orange County Water Board I Councilman Bartlett Councilman Coen Council on Aging Councilman Bartlett Councilman Siebert - Alternate i i Public Cable Television Authority Councilman Coen Councilwoman Gibbs - Alternate Santa Ana River - Santiago Creek Greenbelt Commission Councilwoman Gibbs Councilman Siebert - Alternate Tango Count Sanitation District 011. Mayor Wieder Councilman Shenkman - Alternate Downtown Merchants Guild Councilman Shankman Ci�y Transportation Committee of the: Orange Counter Transit District Councilman Siebert t�Xoor Wieder Southern California Association of Governments Santa Ana It:ver blood Protection AgL,Lcy page #14 - Council Minutes - 76 40ITEMS RECEIVED d FILED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Police Departmen•,: Monthly Report - March, 1976 Resolution .of the Orange Councy Board of Supervisors proclaiming May 9 through May 159 1976 as Orange County's "Action For Foster Children Week", - directing the County Environmental Management Agency to review the County's application I� of zoning codes end conditional use permits to see if they are detrimental to the development of foster homes and encouraging the Cities of Orange County to review their policies and procedures to see what impact they may have on the development of foster homes. Huntington Beach Chamber of Commerce Resolution recommending that the Legislature abolish the Coastal Commission at the earliest possible time and that the California Coastal Plan not be approved in its press-:nt and full form. j Huntington Beach Chamber of Commerce Resolution opposing Proposition #15 on the June 8th Ballot and all its ramifications and urging government, utilities, industry and other bodies directly involved in the generation of power to Vigorously research and bring to reality other means of generation and to encourage energy conservation by all consumers. Huntington Beach Chamber of Commerce Resolution endorsing Proposition #1 200 million dollar State Bond Issue -- School Distracts on the June 8th Ballot and urging overwhelming public support for the measure. Huntington Beach Chamber of Commerce Resolution endorsing Proposition #2 Cal-Vet Bond issue. RECESS COUNCIL Mayor Wieder called a recess of the Council. I RECONVENE i The Mayor reconvened the Council meeting in Room H -8. JOINT MEETING BETWEEN COL41CIL b EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT TEAM The City Administrator brought Council 's attention to his cotmnunication dated April 30, 1976, entitled Budget Update. Also distributed was a communication entitled Study Session Agenda-Setting Goals: Adopting Policy, dated May 3, 1976. Councilman Shealmian spoke regarding the budget and anticipated revenues and requested copies of monthly financial statements, payroll projections and Police and Fire XOtirement Systems. Discussion was held regarding matters pertaining to the City Tax Rate and the poisibi.lity of instituting user fees. C.'ouncilman Shenkman asked if an analysis could be made as to what the costs would be per family for certain Recreational and Parks programs in order for the City to break even. Discussion was held regarding the Shamel Ash true problem. i i Page #15 - Council Mi es - 5/3/76 The Council then reviewed Agenda Item III - Established Policy and Agenda Item 11-A Expenditures - Public Safety. The Police Chief reported on the Policy Bi-Annual Report which had been distributed to the Council. He referred to the Policy Plan which stated the desires of the community relative to police protection. He then spoke regarding current police response time. The City Council requested that a cost-analysis be made relative to establishing a Consumer Proud Division in the City. The Fire Chief addressed council regarding the format to be used presenting the City Budget to Council. Discussion was held regarding the responsibility for school crossing guards and the Deputy City Administrator referred to a communication on the matter. It was the concensus of Council that the School District be the responsible party. ADJOURWENT On motion by Bartlett, second Shenkman, the regular meeting b£ the City Council of the City of Huntington Bench adjourned to Tuesday, May G, 1976 in Room B-7. Motion carried. City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Deach, California ATTEST: Alicia H. Wentworth Harriett M. Wieder City Clerk Mayor Page #15 •- Council M tes - 5/3/76 The Council then reviewed Agenda Item III - Established Policy and Agenda Item II-A Expenditures - Public Safety. The Police Chief reported on the Policy Bi-Annual Report which had been distributed to the Council. He referred to the Policy Plan which stated the desires of the community relative to police protection. He then spoke regarding current police response time. The City Council requested that a cost-analysis be made relative to establishing a Consumer Fraud Division in the City. The Fire Chief addressed Council regarding the format to be used presenting the City Budget to Council. Discussion was held regarding the responsibility for school crossing guards and the Deputy City Administrator referred to a coununication on the matter. It Was the concensus of Council that the School District be the responsible party. ADJOURNMENT On motion by Bartlett, second Slienlmwn, the regular meeting bf the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach adjourned to Tuesday, May 4, 1976 in Room B-7. Motion carried. City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California ATTEST: I C...``. },T Alicia M. Wentworth Harriett M. Wieder City Clerk Mayor The foregoing instrument is o correct copy of the original on file in this office. Attest �f cii(:Iu .4r �,l �,.,,I� ;j,;li!11►�n:���,C, t. � b 1fxM , 0= Ldq 4UAUYATSV* '-0-• OQ,NCOOR LOGAMN5 DRSi.`AM"17plitli 3rd Mwr ApMwwK Neat a Fowoo► IIANt Etm Tow*Ow,,m At At Now ltkpwt • ' wllrT lLliDrwtGa+e�t ftil�o► With tom Crmmuction Activity Mela�pralitl 2n!flaot AioMttta+t M Harlem "sy _70- ASLw N ri on Major Avw A �,.r•'' in 9otton ` I Urban J w attr — a Milan from Touch Dovirm tt Maim Airport II ►ban .�Q.. Newport —3.5 Miler from Takeoff at y Old l!!All port � '�`,r�•��'�w. Ly1 Ary„iet Ltd Ftatitl+rntiA;Arte burbsn Filirnwe—Small Town Cul•de•Sec Sinai! Town& Ouilt Suburban Snn^, lr „—Wooded{tetidvntW Tomato Field on Farm SHEET 11--1. OMDO OR Ldn OR C.SE• ROM EXPOSURES AT TYPICAL LOCAVONS IIM2 t� �a �e �o ya •o CM•EL LAND USE ltdTl�IMrRE'(AtION ficshdcnticti• sirwo Family. '': �:. ;�•'.. .,•• • :. D/Akv.MOWS HonMs .� :f •,�.� ?imvs"' t '%�' •.►�:. .• CLILA&LY ACCEPT"LE wltaftiylle Rernll�/ r,�, h�rS.. :il. ''i�'+. '• r: Tho niie eaMatrs M such '' Y' •i: �•% tt ttlaa iitff+)tiM attMtieirr/ ., , •-4 U40 IM 1pttl Was WAY be �Trtirtttietrt >' •:1, Sri'tC. .tf y{ i-! eternal so wish aasmt"y �LadSi+tir :\. Lr•;; {('(1 • .. .•. tatr kvmIwfwo*w teens al"Wett tt� f Cfaearvsorrra. '''r 'i•. '} _«.�..• .•.::^: � betters LtkarMR. '} be* kwow 4WW ai/"em Clturaftw OWN«wi wmemo s an "NotNa Nurainr Homo ft1DRMALLY ACCIPTABL9 ALWItariurns. Colme Halls. /' ': : '�•�;•; The a,.isr"Pamrs is#rest 0001e Xhetb .` ; `•' ':, '.; f ammmot to be of stntw Comm", i: : :,'?.:<:; .:r r ...: ✓f bus volmow buildlnil arm• Sports Arenas. etGti iden wit.' .*eke Ow kWoat (,W Spectator Sparta .:.r ''s: i . •�✓ evvy4nn+ttms aeompu". vial kw sloo0he quarWIL P*Sroundt, c?• �:: 'i r'r� NelShbo►hood Parma :•:�..:'�i WOKMALLY UNACCEPTA111.E iilall COUrt 'a, Riding Stables. The noise "{iaatrtt is siStti/i- Iyater ftecnition, Cemeteries t; dwrttv tt►are says•e so that ✓ mmsual and txxtly buildir4 Office Quildin;a, Personal, o"uuction is namHasary tar j i9uslnt+ea and Profntionat kWty adequate perlormance Corttmotcirl• Rawl. t of ecti itks. IIs"Wential . ,/� -� irar: barriers ttwst be er*c- Mo vid Thaatvn, AtItaurantt b"wmry the site and prominent noise touress to CantnterCial•Wholesale, Some ptek& outdoor wwiron- ^_ - ltctrit, Ind., h1ft., Utdihn /��' scent tolerable.) . Livestock Farming, / r Animal 6cerdinp CLEARLY UNACCEPTABLE 11ve noise exposurt to to Apaiculture (Eucapt wire that construction costa Llvettock), Mining, Fishing to mt*o the indoor tnviron- Puldlc msnt acceptable for parfatrnancs Might-of•way of octtvitin would bh prohibitive. .. . (Residential utu: the outdoor � Lrxttnswt NtturN ertvironrmnt viouhl be insoles- naeraation Area j able foe normal rasidamial use.) irommunity Noise Equivalent Level liMHCE: HUD, "Aircraft Noiss.ir"opo: Planning Cuidelinn for Local Agencies", by Wilsty d Ham sr+d volt, evana% and Ntrmun, 1972. Adapted to mcorporste CNEL and CNR manure. I SHEET II-2 LAND USE SUITABILITY IN NOISE. IMPACT AREAS I1-3 __-- �...... xMt�trrtttscse.ascrectv..�m APPENDIX III SOUND CO"'ROL SPECIFICATIONS Party Valle and Floor/Ceilina separations 1. All wall and floor insulation shall be sourly fitted and stapled between studs and joists. 2. Studs shall not override plater at party wars. 3. Sound control sealer for all party wells shall be used as follows and In xtrict conformance With the mar►ufacturer's specifications: a. apply a zig-sag bead of ecouatical sealant uudtr all bottom platen. b. All jointe where gypsum board or plywood butt together, shall be well fitted. 4. All waste and water piping shall be isolated from building construction at points of contact with not lass than 1/4" of approved sealer. S. Piping in party walls ahall be installed in such n manner as to avoid direct contact with both walla. b. Provide drywall backing behind 411 tub, shower units. Exta:nd backing up to lip of tub. 7. Plastic 8" x 8" x 1/8" sealer, shall be wrapped around back, sides, tip and bottom of all electrical boxes in the party walls. Boxes shall be backed by a minimum of 3 1/4" thick insulation. 8. Knock-out plates on electrical boxes in all party walls, shall not be bent or removed where conduits are mit connected to box. 9. Electrical boxes (switches, outl.eits, wall fi.xturas, etc. ) telephone outlets or television outlets in opposite faces of party Walls, must always be separated horizontally by not less than 24". j. j. VAN tiOi3` EN & ASSOCIATES URBAN TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGV JEERS 114 F3 ♦CIRCA L INDA NOULRVAND PLACENTIA.CALIPOPINIA 98070 TRLRPHONI! (7141 6621-41120 April 16, 1976 Mr. Jim Carter Spruce Grove Incorporated 121 Royal Oak Drive Anaheim, Californian 92807 Dear Mr. Carters This letter will ouppitmnt the February 11, 1976 letter report our firm prepared for you regarding traffic generated by the 193 unit apartment to be located on San Angelo Drive in Huntington Beach. Fvv the previous report, ectunts here ride on Malaga Lane, north of Stark Street and on Stark Street near Beach Boulevard. Those counts were 24 hoar counts that were set midday Monday and picked up midday Tuesday. Becsuoc Monday -ometimes has lees traffic than other days in the meek, additicnal counts have been made to verify if the Monday counts were representative. The additional counts were set midday Wednesday and picked up midday Thursday. 'These coants were on Malaga Lane both north and south of Stark Street, And also on the alley behind tho shopping center that leads into Stark Stroet . The rasultp are presented in Table 1, It c An be seen that Malaga Lane north og Stark Straot had lass traffic fov the Wsdoosday count than for :ha Monday counts The two one way counts wexoe 480 and 530 vabLeles per day reapoctivoly. To further check on the validity of the counts, data from Orange County Fond Department were czamined to determine the variation between day of week. Three count locations were selected and are prey►ented in Table 2. For two of theae 'locations the Monday counto were slip' tly lower than the Wednesday counts. For one location the Monday count; vas higher. For all Locations the Saturday and Sunday traffic van significantly lower Lhan the rent of the week. Saturday and Sunday traffic is usually lower except for recreational routes. laor instance, Coast Highway in the su:naer will probably have higher Saturday and Sunday traffic volumes than midweek. The affect of present traffic volumes on the traffic index (T.1.) e.alcu- lationo can be seen in Table 3. It can be Been that rattler larg., increases in existing traffic can occur before the T.I. to significantly changed. HUNTIN(ITON BEACH t'LANNINr► DFPT. .APR ? 0 976 Q 0c"< 111O C.1e'1'cen IN LCAN A►"Z)VtjFrl ANO C AAt` IU C.Ci1JNTtC(J Page x Existing traffic could triple btfore a T.E. of 5.0 was exceeded. We hope this additional discussion concerning traffic volumes and Traffic index will be of assistance to you. Respectfully submitted, CROMMELIN-PRINGLE AHD ASSOCIATES, El1C. William A. Kunxman, P.E. Associate Engineer WK:pp I Table 1 Prenent Traffic Volumes Malaga Lane and Alley 24 hour 8.9 A.M. 5-6 P.M. Loca in fume lame lsisne I Malaga north of Stark Northbound 480 5 50 Southboundl 480 35 30 Malaga south of Stark Northbound 350 25 20 Southbound 350 10 30 Alley behind Shopping Center as it intersects Stark Northbound 530 90 20 Southbound 530 10 70 I I 1 �r•r Table 3 Traffic wexes for Various Volusies Voluen Range izieting Traffic .T..+�.1< sh San ire„;,T.1s 121M Lmod,. 4.6 925 to 1110 205 to 390 4.7 1111 to 1326 391 to 608 4.8 1329 to 1581 6" to 861 4.9 1582 to 1677 662 to 1157 5.0 1878 to 2219 1158 to 1499 * The Existing Traffic Volusnrs Xeni'e is the range of traffic to which the 720 in or out trips attributmble to the developnsnt could be Added and yet stay vithin the T.X. I Table 2 Traffic Volumes by Day of meek Day of Location Location Location Week Z,----- -.--.I.. Monday 17,125 89750 Tuesdar y S 323 17,945 8,360 Wednesday 7.379 18,600 8,650 Thursday 70226 161955 $0660 Friday 7 SS9 169380 99090 Saturday 5,215 159165 6,650 Sunday 30960 109740 4,270 Location 1: Irvine Blvd . south of Brietol Northbound 7111/72 to 7/16/72 i Location 2: Katetls Ave. vest of Los AliwitOs Blvd. East- bound - 11/25/67 to 12/1/67 Location 3t Main Street north of Sunflower both directions 6/3/64 to 6/9/64 . t CRO'IV1MULINaPPING ANO AS*OCIATROs INCft URBAN TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERS 11413 VOhwA LINO^ POWLaVAND PLA06N71A.CALIFIC04NIA ONG70 TOLNPMONS M41 tea-413o February 11, 1976 Mr, Jim Carter. Spruce Grove Incorporated t 121 Royal Oak Drive Anaheim, California 92807 Dear Mr. Curter: This report contains our findings relative to the trat"ic impact of the proposed 193 unit apartme to be located an Sea► Angelo -ive in HuntingtonBeach. I f It �/ t ESLXti&Traffic To establish existing traffic, machine volume counts were made on I tags Lane north of Stark Street, and on Stark Street east of Beach Boulev. The results of these machine counts are contained in Table I under Prr. Traffic. To determine the turning movernents at the intersection of Beach and Stark, a hand count made by CalTrans in May, 1974 was utilized and factored up 10 percent to account for traffic growth. These peak hour volumes are shown in Table 2. jr is GeOer,stiog and Distribujian To establish the ,amount of traffic which will be generated by the site, standard trip generation rates have been utilized . Typical trip generation rates are 10 to 12 trips per day for single family detached dwelling units, and 6 to 9 trips per day for multiple family dwelling units, Although the Planning 'Department in Huntington Beach recosrlmends a value of 6.3 trips per multiple family dwelling unit, a higher rate has been assumed to be safe. The value used was 7.5 trips per dwelling, and the 193 dwellings will pro- duce about 720 inbound and 720 outbound trips per day. Of the total trips generated by the development, all wil'k use Malaga and Beach, unless a second access to the site is provided on Wells Rocd. 1f the second access is provided, only 5 or 10 percent of the total traffic will use it since it doles not make a good connection with either shopping, employment, or the San Diego Freeway. The total trips generated by the development were added to the Malaga, Stark, end Beach existing volumes to determine future traffic volumes. It was assumd no diversion would occur to Wells Road, See Tables I and 2 for the future volumes. C1Nr#0911 the LCM ANML" ANO 00%ANMV COUN71110 page 2 w yStrret�C�,D�C.iCi£,g Thp capacity of one through lane 1a about 1600 vehicles per hour, and the capacity of either a right turn or left team late is about 1300 vehicles per bo►!r . These capacities assume continuous operation. When a signal ig installed, operation is allowed only when the signal is green. To di-termine if Adequate street capacity exists to accomodate the traffic, Malaga has been examined just north of Stark; Stark has been examined aid- biock between Malaga and Beach; and the intersection of Beach and Stark has ' been examined. l'he future volume on tialags north of Stark will be heaviest in the PH peak hour at 155 northbound vehicles. This is well below the capacity of this one lane in cacti direction road. If the capacity is assumed to be 1600 vehicles per hour, then it operates at only 10 percent of capacity. ;. t� The future volume on Stark will also be heaviest in the PM peak hour at 305 eastbound vehicles. This roadway has two lane& in each direction with i a capacity of 3200 vehicles per hour in either direction. This road operated 1� also at 10 percent of capacity. i. The: most critical location for capacity will be at the signalized inter- ; section of beach and Stark. The signal operates by first giving north/ south through traffic a green light, then giving north/south left turns a green light, .and then giving east/went trat'fic a green light. Of the northbound and sorthbound through traffic, they highest voletme is southbound traffic in the PM peak hour at 2105 vehicles. The north/aouth through capacity is 4800 vehicles per hour of green for either direction of travel . Vie 2105 vehicles per hour will require the north/south through green light to be on 44 percent of the time. Of the northbound and sorthbound left turns, the highest volume, is aouth- bound lefts in the- PM peak hour at 200 vehicles. The capacity of thin movement is 1300 vehicles per hour of green and the light will need to be green 15 percent of the time to accomodate this left turn movemesit. Of they eastbound and westbound traffic, this highest volurew in westbound traffic in the PM peak hour at 190 vehicles per hour. Of chest, 190 vehi- clus, most go right, some go t.eft, and a few go through. About 120 go right and a Nce right turn on red to allowed, only about 90 will actually need a green light. The capacity of the right: turn lane is 1300 vehicles l,ar hour and* the light will need to be green 7 percent of the time to serve this movement. By adding the 44, 15, and 7 percents together, it to seen that a green light is needed somewhere 66 percent of the time. The t'rriainfng 34 percent of the time is extra. Thus the intersection is operating at only 66 per- cent of capacity. Traffic lndcx__ The traffic index for Malapn has been calculated fur e►no its determining , f the struccurral cross sf,ction. of the etreet can accesilodate tt►e added iffie . They traffic Index is a, number indicating the weight r.nd volnrry ut truck t i ! f t c on a roadway for the design period. f Thc• forcru l.j for cxlcic iatinR a traffic index is as follows: A. 119 ` traffic index - 6. 7 (rIJL11 ,0110,000) h whc•rc• r:1J1, rquivntunt wheal loads over life of pavement. 1•WL D x ((P2 x F2) + 01 x F3)) x L where, D - daily traffic (1250 vehicles) 1►2 - percent of traffic that is 2-axle trucks ( 0.92% )* 1?: = AxIe Factor for 2-axle trucks ( 200 )* i►'3 - percent of traffic that is 3-axle trucks ( 0.347. )* 3 = Axle Factor f r r 3-ax 1.• trucks ( 690 ) 1. - life of roadway in years ( 10 years )* T1iN�c- values are recommended by Orange County Road Department, for cal- calating traffic indexes for local residential streets. `4 '1'1,• a its index Which results When the above numbers are used is 4.7. It1 Summary S. 1 . Malaga Lane and Stark Street wi11 operate far below capacity. The intersection of fieach Boulevard and Stark Street will operate at :. 66 percent of capacity after Lhe proposed development is completed. h� traffic inde< for Mala a Lane will be 4.7. :I. `t S 4 . 1 - ., -weend arsers to the site is provided on We t is Road, only 5 or 10 pi,rcent of the total traffic from the site is likely to use it. This access is not needed . Al Wv trust ti,is a.ialvsis will be of assistance to you in developing this project . t t, call bc c►l further- assistance, please contact us. I%1-SPt'k-t fill IV s►ibmitted , i c'+ ov 11:1.IN •• PRINGLE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. .. W t 1 1 i tun •c. r�c,i�, nnn, P. E. Associate Engineer '.;.1K•1tc . 1 Table l I TRAFFi': «OLMES - MALAGA LANE & D STARK STREET Malaga Lane Stark Street SIB SB .B WE Present Traffic 24 hour volume 530 530 2470 2470 8-9 AN vo 1 ume 15 35 135 115 5-6 PM volume 65 45 215 230 Development Traffic 24 hour volume 720 720 720 720 R-9 AM volume 15 45 15 45 5-6 PM volume 90 55 90 55 Future Traffic 24 hour volume 1250 1250 3190 3190 8-9 AM -olume 30 80 150 160 5-6 PM volume 155 100 305 285 HUM i;N aTOM BEACH AFR I1,41 j( '.RSICNED RESIDENT'S DO IIeRI:I)1' (1PPt)SH: 111E PRO-IF T tV1'n.IUIiD UNU:.R LSF: PERMIT NO. 76-12 F'I1.E0 (IN 1?:lIRlIARY 18, 1976 W1111 - -"W H HfiM4b�'i aPJCd,ltWr'W&N BEACH. VA'IE PKINTED 'NIME 51GNA111KE ADDRESS S'1' i Id ILA ksai r ' 13'� .sue , ''�'f�.�1 ,�X.�'`s�L.IL � � w�„�`:.+a�c.�-r�„L.ci�¢._.. �........«.......• 1�LL 1. ,. • �� --T'r , jaleoe.P n,4,0 ti •�� .�a c•'.c�• ti.rc�ct�•..-...r '�{�O � 4.� ,� 17 ' 2 ` '�.ot tid � .L1____..� 5 ._..... ...i.,t.[ 4-ll.EA►tl 74 '� --- c{a... Yl1L • t Gc. c,x= . .._._�::.,.._,.._.'��'�' • SIM• �' �.r.C.LJ�,lea � �i'_..� '�.1�3�?'rC,L�,.t�'G�►�' �r�.�` �r t..:�.�'' �.`� y�� r ,r��=!.� rJ.�.0.����.,a,#�c+� .�...r..a _,... .w aw rr+r.rrtl..wrw..w.._. r..�++�••_may MON..,._.. - - - -- — � . by r .. . _ •~ / p, 7,056 films'ICi:c Man 1�1SIG . cs: USE PEWT 76-12 . MTICE IS HERIBY GIVU that a 14blie hearing, will be held by the , City Council of the City of Hunciaiton Bleach, in . the ,Coun+cil Chamber of the Civic Center, Nmtiniton Beach, an the hoar of ..?gL P.M. , or as soon thereafter ar possible 0 on Monday the 7th day of June , 19,76, for the purpose of considering an App&-11 to the denial by the City Planning Commission of Use I Permit No. 76-12 to permit the construction of a 193--unit apartment complex parauant to Section 9202.3 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. The subject i property is located on the south side of the San Diego Freeway at the east and of San Angelo Drive in the R3 (Medium High Density Residential District) . A legal � description is on file in the Planning Department Offica. All intereo ted prer6ow are 10Vita4 to attend Said hearing and express their opinioas for or against said Ptirther reformation my be obtained from the Afffca of aw City Clark. 'ram: - May 19, 1976 CITT Or. f N ABACK BY: Alfci`*Wentworth r Use Permit No. 76--12 .-.,1lppeal . cc sideriij, an ;ppsa l to d'ni Ai by the Planning Conunission to permit A the construction of a 193-unit apartmnet complex pursuant to Section 5:I t of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. The subject property is located on the south side of the San Diego Freeway at the east end of San Angelo Drive in the R3 (Medium High Density Residei tial District) . A legal description is on file in the Planning Departmnet Office. r , ,• u ", MIV :r1►i-r�.Z 107-�771 b7 T 107-773 -10 df r• +]'#ssesl :C�trt�rz, ' rii�tarli� AS: �'ra9'�IC t laude Xacoel 1C t 8131 SAn Angelo Drive, . • •r. - 15]. '8cnati•'OxfordA 4-12-'76 Los kW4A�tlr, `CJ1 Huntington Beach, CA 9264 • d" 107 df �! Cartor A o h P. teirer 1.21 : A�oya1 Oak Road 16�,3Z Mitlaga Lane, Apt A akra laa, California fthtingtan boache CA 92647 107-2 p�-59 df r, .�' 107»771-09 df • .-9tat�. o Calif Transporta�- Edwin Mooaoyan Tian U+� t. 16072 Malaga Lane �c,? err'.: �•' , Huntington Beach, CA 0647 107- 22 -55 df 1q7--771-10 df City Westminster Louis Aquilina 9200 , rtmOtster Avenus 16092 Malaga Lane was EmUmij. CA 92663 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 107-- 0156 df 107-773-02 df D 4 p Asoociates Emil F. Pesek DaVi . M. ' Kelly 15121 Malaga Lane, Apt. A 363 Miguel Drive, &TE. F Huntington Beach CA 92647 Ntwp�, Beach, CA 92660 g ` j 107- 58 df 107-773-03 df. Hunt on Villa Assoc. Ifi.11iam F. Voorhes 1 555 South Flower Street 16111 Malaga Lane, Apt. A 3sti 25 Huntington }Beach, CA 92647 Los ►�i, gles, CA 90071 107-77 Ol df 107�-773•-04 df on � Da Doresak J. Richard Foster 161S � la a Lane 16101-A Malaga Lane IMnti gtonSeach, 9 CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA, 92647 107- 2 df 107-773-05 df ;' rd a Itiamr , Stewart- B. Van Dyne :.' 1614 ago Lam 4151 Silliman Drive ; t Reach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 99649 i 107-771-03 df 107-773-08 df �f taul E.. .'eailand Will#.m L. Richard* r� $869 NW0d0i 4 Or- , A10. C AMMIo "darts *ia, CA 92626 ftr t jtan 1l s h, . CA -92447 Sri 0 Xrly"I%T-71i,604 df 4e,t 1 ' J. SAad•rtt r r1►� ,DCA9 024� >�a�►w j nis �rr Laajiritigtiirl, df 107-773-10 df vt Ka�bar• el I&OA t*nb, Apt. A Rmt ; #,on teach, CA 92447 _ •: df N. -12 �.V1 i Marta�i�otar.106 CA 92683 107'S22-�? ' .. df 107�-524-02 df x :W�.1�law� E. ems► 1�hlip ��, �lax�er A6300, jis st "t 10d41, ' ttir1y Drive West oinstew, CA 92683 ton Baaah, 'CA 92646 2�7 523-�01 107-54-03 df Richard-D. Green Donald J. 98=M3 16281 Jim Street 16301 'Teri Street Westminster, CA 92683 Westminster. CA 62683. 107=523-02 df 107444--04 Of J. • n James,' r. Steinmetz 512. P iaoetan Ave. 16311 '.Tari street Wes nster, CA 92683 Wastatnster, CA, 92683 107• «►03 df 107- 524-05 df Charles. N. Sewrighti�, John R. Walinitz 163C in St�:eet n� 16321•;Teri Street Wes ster, CA 99683 Westminster, Ch 92683 107 2 -04 df 107-524--06 df T Garland Ill. Rebecca N. HOWUVAn 16311 Jim Street 16331 Teri Street Wes star, CA 92683 Weetminator, CA 92683 107 -05 df 107-524-07 R.8 Butterfield -''j! ' Richard L. Uttting �,�•�• 163 Teri Street 8311 Wells Road Westminster, CA 946$3 Westminster, CA 92683 -06 df Carl Moore 1631 Teri street Was nster, CA 92683 107-523-07 Of verna M. Wingrarrea 16300 .Teri Street ists�inrter, CA 92683 107-523-08 df Peter H. Mans% r 16290 Teri Drive Westminster, CA 92683 107-523-09 df Bruce Adams 16280 Teri Street Westminster, CA 92683 sL PERMIT V0 7►6-12 supplemmtal listing typed 4-22, 1976 107-521-�4a P2-.ilip Brags Coustn+ry, V" D j t g1,4 7 L�►Pas #9 K., C. ;Blalock West will• Ad Huntington Beach, CA 92647 U42 Was #18 Westminster, CA 92683 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 107--521-5s Jot Egan Resident Stauffer, Richard P 8142 LaPaz #6 0142 LaPaz #15 8340' Wells Rd Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington D*aah, CA 92647 Westminster, CA 92683 10? -Z9s err David C. Long Co , n L it. 8142 LaPas #5 Resident (Giannascoli) rno lfi - rno Cr it �l f Huntington Beaoh, CA 92647 8142 LaPas #20 Huntington Brach, CA 92641 We minster, CA 92683 11�J 107-511-30s Resident Cordon Krarar De , Joseph Z P Ei 8142 La Paz #4 16141 Malaga Ln 16 �'� ody Cr Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, MCA I '+�© attar, CA 92683 107 �-32s John Trilvar Ruth E. Kramer Wistrger, BeAa 2 LaPaz #17 1,6141 Malta Ln #A 163 Jody Cr 814 9 Wes I. star, CA 92683 Huntington Beach, CA 92697 Huntington Beach, CA 1076- 11-3Ss Marie Silva Mr i Mrs. J.B. Jackson Lon Edward R jt 8142 LaPaz #16 16141 Malaga Ln #B 163 Jody Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA WQstm ter, CA 92683 107- U-57s Putt ,' Cahrles R. Gary Harlow Richard R. Dalisacandi-u 1636 oadruff St 8142 LaPaz #19 16141 E Malaga Lane 16s star, CA 92683 Huntington Beach, Cep 92647 13untingtran Beach, CA 92647 107--511-58s Res'-dent Mr a Iris Doresak Neill, Wildred 9142 La Paz #1 16152 RRIaga W 16350 W�oadruff St Huntington Beach, CA 92647 11untin ton Beach, CA 92647.Westminater, CA 92683 107-501-30;i Mar�oriu Norris Toni V. rama► Ryan, James L 9142 LaPaz #12 JoAnne rl Pama 16330 Timothy Ln Huntington Ht.ach, CA 92617 16152 Malaga #D Westminster, CA 92603 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 10 7-501• 33a g Ce Mala Pr j ne ! Lauabrose, T Robert onna rooks 16152 Malaga OF i 16331 Timothy Ln 8142 LaPaz #1,4 Huntington Pzach, CF� 92647 Westminster, C^ 92683 Huntington Brach, CA 92647 SE PZXUT .DSO. 76-12 Supplwiental Listing 4--22-76 Mr• a. Mrs... W. R. Williams Jane milligin Philip Casrj 16152 Malaga !At 8131 San Angelo #5 16192 Malaga Ln #B #$ Bunt Beach, CA 92647 Hunt Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Sharon R. Davis Len Allmann Peter Chu :L6152 .Malaga #C 6131 San Angelo #23 Grace Chu Huntington Beach . CA 92647 Hunt Beach, CA 92647 16192 Malaga Ln #A Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Jo Iiancock Alta C. Campbell 8 - San Angelo Dr John S Schfsk Jr Jam M. Campbell H ngton Beach, CA 92647 8131 San Angeloo#25 16192 Malaga Lame #F Huntington Beach, CA Hunt Beach CA 92647 92647 Ree dent J. foster 8131 San Angelo Dr #28 Robert H Gibson May R. Foster zIi ngton Beach, CA 401 Atlanta #39 16101 Malaga Lane #A A 4 Huntington Beach, Ch 92647 Hunt Beach CA 92647 d R Garrison John Sheets Alice M. Talbott 81 San Angelo #26 8131 San Angelo #14 16101 Malaga Tin #$ hunt Beach, CA 92647 Hunt Beach, CA 92647 Hunt Beach CA 92647 s M Koehler Simon Perron Ellen ZeccaL 11 Ir J M Koihler Jr 8131 San Angelo 16101 Malaga Ln #D el 1 San Angelo #8 Huntington Beach, C.P. 92647 Hunt Beach CA 92647 Hrnt Beach, CA 92647 St Maber Lynda L YOung Marian E. Errickson 65 Edinger Ave 16192 Malaga Ln #A 16101 Malaga Ln #C H ington Beach, CA Bunt Brach, CA 92647 Hurst Beach CA 92647 Carolyn Miller Jim P. Rotsybar Resident 8131 San Angelo Dr 16102 Malaga Ln #C 16101 Malaga Ln #F Huntington beach, CA Hunt Beach, CA 92647 Hunt Beach Ch 92547 92647 E.L. Hopkins Janice Leirar Claudia Boddington Robert L. Hopkins A. P. Lkirer 8131 San Angelo #1 16192 Malaga Ln #B 16132 A Malaga Ln Itutn Beach CA 95647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 aunt Beach, CA Joyce Davidson Sally Gales Ronald Coleman 8131 San Angelo #4 Scott Gale 16132 B 11=tington Beach, CA 16192 Malaga Lno , Malaga Huntington Beach, CA 92647 ;juntington Beach, CA USS PEN41T. KGO 76-12 gupplelftatal Listing 4-22-76 Mrs.. Alice G. . 8rever Wbert Darwin U 11; Colstaan 16121. Mala'Vir Ln #B. 16072 Malaga Ln #C .''16132 . B' Malaga Huntington Beach, CA Huntington Beach, Ch Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Anne►. Lae Mrs. J 5ynnes Donna Pea" 132 16 Malaga Ln #D 16121 Malaga In #C 16082 Malaga In #A Hunt Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA Mihele Yabonich Resident Mark Revere 16142 Malagh Ln #S 16121 Malaga Ln #B 16072 Malga Ln #B i Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntingon Beach, CA J. Yabonibh MR MW Emil E Pesek 16132 . K.Jaga Ln #E 16121 Malaga Ln M Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Helen L Leirer Mildred Braver Allen Lai.rer 16121 #F Malaga 16132 Malaga Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Darrell D. Kinsley Louie Aguilina Michelle D. Kinsloy 16082 Malaga Lne 16132 Malaga #F Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Denyse Moulders Sharon Luis '14 - t 16132 Malaga Lr, #C 16082 Malaga Ln #D ; Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA Susan o Sharon DAlessandro S u Connor 16141 Malaga Ln #E 16082 Malaga In #C Huntington Deach, CA Q2647 Huntington Beahc, CA Jackies Tourgwtan Ernest ve1azque2 16112 Malaga Ln. #B 16082 Malaga Ln #B Huntington Beach, CA Ptuitington Beach, CA Mr A Mrs. Frank F'al ske Miriam Blrmane" 16121 Malaga Ln #D 16072 Malaga Lrt #D Huntington Beach, CA Huntington Bench, CA i ��+{��)d 1.•"! 'yr y.-y►�.w rwV;.�A.w..'.... ...r..., •..y. .•...n wF►w.,,.... •+rr..•-..... ..... .... ..�- d� d 107-5 1-13 . .>� r. aiar►d CU►'C s vi s ion �of Riohways ohn R., Shepard /f Mate of California 1420 we11'r Road Jas*s Carter SX.-rornto 93814 #.,��=T6 r CA ftstsainmker, Ca 92683 107-�511-r31 y df 107 ' 51 -59 df 107-521-15 df Doha id' -V. MCVay John C: Andrus Theodore Roen ig am ark 8832. Derek 16340 Ooodruff 16331 Weodruff Street Huntington Reach, CA 92647 Westsll i ter, CA 92683 Westminster# CA 92683 10. 7-511-38 it df 107- 514-60 ,' 4f. 1015521-16 df Norma 0. Benefielc! General Pacific 'Corp. 16341 Jody Circle N� Daniel G. Larson. Qarden Grove Blvd. ,.. 16341 Woodruff Sheet Westmi.nstar, CA 92683 Garden Grove, CA 92643 . Westminster, CA 99683 . 105-511-31 df 107-501--31 df 107-521-34 d! Donald G, Farmer 't James X. Danes' � ' Otto W. 5eboldt 16321 J;ay Circle . 16320 Timothy Lane 1.6370 Dana Circle Westminster, CA 92683 Westminster, lam; Westminster, CA 92Ad 1•07-511-33 df 107-521-06 df 107--521�-35 FAusto J. Bustos Wayna a. Rutledge yohd D. Reeher 16320 Jody Circle 8350 Wells Road 16369 Dana Circle Westminster, CA 92686 Westminster, CA 99183 Westminster, CA 92683 17-511-34 df 107-521-07 df 107--532--01 df City of Westminster Ronald Erickson City Hall 8360 Wells road Leslie D. Do Mill- Westminster, CA 92683 10698 91 Toro Lane WEstminstar, CA 92683 Fountain Valley, CA 04 107-511-91 df 1079521-09 df 107-522-02 df Michael A. Park it Donald E. Wright Ralph Del Ponte 8440 Wells Road 8370 Wells Road Westminster, CA 92683 8421 Wells Road WEsiatnineter, CA 92683 Westminster, CA 92683 107-511-62 df 107-521-09 df - 107 522-03 df Fred Youngblood Carl C. Harvey 8450 Wells Prad 3380 Wells Road 84111We11eadSRoe Westminster, CA 92689 Westminster, CA 92683 Westminster, ad 92 107-511-63 df 107-w521-10 df 107-522--04 df Naron L. Weelands aarnes . Mcxnsson 8460 Wells Road 8394 Weil* Road Lawrence Fletcher ? � Westminster, CA 96283 Westminster# CA 92683 st Road i' Weestminstenster, Ch 92683 107-511-64 df 107-521-11 df 107-522 -05 dl James S. Short 10 " Stanley R. Fencel 8470 Wells toad A' 840C Wells Road George J. Martinez Westminster, CA 92683 Westminster, CA 92683 16200 Jim Street Westminster, CA 92683 107-511-65 df 107-521-12 df 107-522-06 di John M, Lovely Lloyd A. German Lloyd Haring $480 Wells Road 8410 hells Road Mestni,ns;.er, CA 92683 WA!ntminster, CA 92683 16290 Jim Street Wastm.in»ter, CA 92683 r T Huntingfonl each Planning Co.mmission P.O. Box 190 CALIFORNIA 92649 TDe Honorable Mayor and City Council 1 : FROM: Planning Commission ' DATE: April 28 ,. 1976 AT1N: David D. Rowlands , City Administrator RE: Proposed Moratorium on a "Planning Reserve" Parcel Adjacent to San Diego Freeway The Planning Commission at its meeting of April 20, 1976, by a unanimous vote of the Commissioners present, recommended that a development mora- torium be placed on the above referenced siti (refer to attached. area map) . This recommendation was primarily theireselt of a development proposal which will permit construction of a 193 iinit apartment complex. The proposed location is a parcel of land made availa le for develop- ment by the California Department of Transportation a a surplus parcel in the latter part of 1975. ' The Commission as the result of its review of this development proposal, discussed the present zoning of R3 (Medium/High Density Residential) and its relationship to surrounding developments and its conformance with the intent and purpose of. the "Planning Reserve" General Plan designation. This land use designation was recommended by the Planning Commission and ultimately adopted by the City Council in July, 1975. The purpose of this action was to allow the Commission and Planning Staff to more thoroughly analyze all possible land use alternatives for the site. This additional review was determined to be desirable because of the many development problems that can be attributed to the parcel, such as limited access , close orientation to the San Diego Freeway with resultant high noise level potentials, and possible adverse impact on the adjacent developments, The Planning Commission determined that these planning concerns were of such sufficient seriousness that additional land use analysis would be in the best planning interests of the area. Therefore, the Planning Commission recommends trat the attached ordinance which will place a three (3) month moratorium on the issuance of building permits be approved by the City Council. Respectfully submitted, r chard- A. Harlow, Secretary RAH:JMC:gc i t f� J f � � r' / I EDINGER t^- _ E.L 23 [^ �:- R3 , L2 `^ 4� _ t STARK AVE R3 WUi t . L2 L�=D?.} s R3CL . ,.... •- S Z t000- tCl O � ;GALE —_ tNj FEET r. PROPOSED MORATORIUM AREA Jj , ritrrtrrt,roti sr r[N HUNUMTQN *EACH PLANNING DEFT. �s�i{�•i`{ia�f�is u ti � riffs i.{ �s a.ia 1000 i �'+ iLf1 i air•{• t J M� fE€T /•r• .• •f:r i�a/aria Q 3CXLE i •{ •.{.•..I �� r. ! / i a . w..•f r . ., •..' .•••.. UBJ ECT .. ITE Wl •.J f• /us . .{1. ..f•i• . {1 1 f•f 1{�. •• .i.{ {f 1•1 i./.. .t i..•r I i • . Go* 0 •• /•. •. {.. . .• ..•oil i•1"� M� ••f.• 1.a s.i11f/• .s/s/ i 111i i. 1 .• ..11...• •.•10 {a• .• .r . srr9•w .w•. ..rw..s.. rfrr.ii..rt� Ir•;•.ra ���• .'•1•.•.at!••{•r� U cn COMMERCIAL PUINNING RESERVE o MEDIUM DENSITY e J. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION � mparC70%IBM" • IjuxrnTrOW XE,�f-M WK KPT- ORDINANCE NO AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON � BEACH IMPOSING A MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS BY THE DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND COM14UNITY DEVELOPMENT ON CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY EAST OF SAN ANGELO DRIVE AND .SOUTH OF THE SAN DIEGO FREEWAY WHEREAS , the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach i desires to establish a moratorium on the issuance of building permit; for that parcel of land east of San Angelo Drive and south of the San Diego Freeway and more specifically described • e period o three months ; and herein; said moratorium to b for r d f h nt � p The purpose of the moratorium is to allow the Planning Department and the Planning Commission to study the compatJbility of the present uses In the area , and to study and propose zoning amendments which would be compatible with the area and also con- sistent with the General Plan of the City ; and The Huntington Beech Ordinance Code under Section 9051 and Government Code Section 65858 permit the enactment of an interim ordinance as an urgency measure to nrotect the public health , safety and welfare ; and The C:it C,oi;nci1. of the City of Huntington Beach finds it y .� E necessary that this ordinance be adopted as an urgency measure to protect t,ie public health , safety and welfare , 1404, THEREFORE , pursuant to the provisions of the Huntington y r Section 8 8 of Beach Ordinance erode , S _c .ion 9051 , and Section 65 5 the Government Code of the State of California , the City Council of the City of Hur:tingt;on Beach dove hereby ordain as follows SECTION 1. . The real p roper-y described hereinbelow is hereby declared to be In a moratorium area insofar as any new construction or issuance of new building permits are concerned . SECTION 2. The area where the moratorium is imposed is specifically described as follows : 1 JdC: cs 1 . That portion of the north half of the northwest quarter of Section 24 , Township 5 South, Range 11 West , in the Rancho Las Bolsas , City of Huntington Beach , County of Orange , State of California , as shown on a map recorded in Book 51. , Page 13 of Miscellaneous gaps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County and more specif- ically described as follows : Beginning at: the southeast corner of the .*iorth half of the north;•,est quarter , thence north 89029151" west 158 . 45 feet along the south line of the north half of said Section 211 , to the true point of beginning; thence continuing along said south .line , north 89629 ' 51" west 478. 13 feet ; thence north 390144152" west 558 . 50 feet ; thence north 117128104" west 754 . 06 feet ; thence north 21015145" east 98 . 69 feet ; thence north 66°15 ' 45" east 14 . 111 feet ; thence north 2101,5145" west 20 . 00 feet , to a point on the south right of way line of the San Diego Freeway , as it now exists ; thence south 681411 , 15" east 112 . 09 feet along said right of tray line ; thence south 51°09 ' 04" east 755 . 39 feet along said right. of Tway line ; thence south 49040 , 081, east; 842 . 35 feet along said right of way line , to the true point of beginning . SECTION 3 . Thl.s is an urgency ordinance necessary for the immediate preservation of the public health , safety and welfare in order to facilitate the orderly study and planninE, of said area. , and to protect the public saf'ety and welfare , and shall take ..f fact upon adoption . This ordinance sh-1.1. be of no further force and effect; three months from the date of its adoption , unless extended by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach. SECTION 11 . The City Cleric shall r'.ertif'y to the nassa ,e of this ordinance and shall cause say, 'j to be nublished within .fifteen days after the passage in the Huntington Beach News , a nevisnaper of general circulation , printer' and published in Hunting t;on Reach California . PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof' held on the 3rd day of May , 1976. ATTEST: Mayor C ty Clerk 2 . 1 1 APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: A�2 --AO - q r City Administrator Gi Attorney' � i 1 APPROVED , 1NITTATTNG DEPARTMENT: f i t j .. t i r } I y i 7 i i t t i i No. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected; qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing ordinance was read to said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of 19 , and was again read to said City Counc'1 at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of 19 , and was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of, more than a majority of all the members of said City Council. AYES: Councilmen: NOES: Councilmen: ABSENT: Councilmen: City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California Xrt*.te. t. Carter 121 Royal O-CK Ilraacl 1U3al�cirn; Ep307 April 30, 1976 1 �1 �r.Ct.I►F. Je? Homrable City Council .City of IIunti rrton Beach H tin sxn, D--amn, C.z I first became imrnl v.3,1 with dhis property ouirl;r in DecamWr 1975. Tnoki.mt at this par^el. X f Eta,-elEta,- it iswel] ].ocate.i for. anR 3 Projecthec-luse it is cmpatible atiCa :sltrrounr1i:-ir7 buildinrist its t1oso Ina-ttion to shapping and eating places .and rtrn-I aecmns to the freeway For ja-+r)plr3 cnminq (In.l drainer to work. On Wcanber 9, 1975 I ci eczed c•1►i..bi t-.lie TPlanninrl Derr.bmnt anal t-Mzal tra Sergio aml lie told me t':,st it vr s 7nnc-1 11-3 an 1 th-it tha marrounriing property :in Hl ntinciton W-ic`t t-rns al-In T?-3. fie did state tr7 me at that tirm that he Felt thar.-e w-mll W gre-tt o,),- )sitir)n Fri t^eatminster.. O"Jier than that he Felt t h-rit talk-+ propart y mul i be :leveloperl as R-3. After the property went to bir3 an-1 are darn succes oful in r1ctti.ncr the bid, Fro prelYlryl a prqxml to :levelnp Use prrr?�er.hy. R-, went to ttrn pro- subrait�t-A !;essionn to mike rmr. CrxlslPY. mrnlaly with the city's requi.ranents. On rabnriry 18 wry stilmit:tel nur pty:�r3nl to the Divimrmantll review Marl, =I it: pnsscxl. Tien it mmt to WY3 Marr-1 of Zoning 4r}3are it still had saw minnr problam that co,ilrl h, romntval but tyre Vets` still opp .siti.on frm the sus:mumlim re9i:1nnts. It w:is Gent iig to hM planninry ecactmiasion set for, April 19, 106. There was s7m mom usi.on .as to tho nimber of plain to be sapplie 1, an l aA-- ;ire tvn sh.-art i.n supplYi ! enoucih for al i the eamissi onars. on Friday baFore the mating, actaiti.rmal plans wr3re supplied. Slie crxmi.ssionars themn m-Tiersted a boo areal: delay for the hearinrr and l I arTrea-1. At t rit tiny. they (lid not want to he{r any 11�>tcts pert aini.ng to the cmie anal said it: mukl brs ho-mi later, on thy 4th. Can April 27th I way -n-icle ntnre or the fnrat that the Plminin7 Crmnissioa later that niriht, aft--r. I left i ntc-1 tuianirnmusly to rerlur:st the City Council to enact a mnratnrim on t�iis property. Gen-�-lermn, I yam kern to dr) %4hrit I ikZuy-- tried to rin in the 1xu3t, plead my ease pertaining to 'Inm rtr"I the proio^t is. tlast of tlia paople seem +o be aiell orr aniza1 to figat the pmi,K-.t on mntions, lrit tho Fact .is I tum desi.gn--1 one OF U-ir! Lya;t an. ilexes in Ii intin-rton Beach fr•m Wie st:%Mpoint of: i 1. .Securiyt (Iatter rmm x)l.ica clen-rent st;tti_n-I Unt it will, be (.no no t:te safest i,-i t*-ve city) 2. Pri•.rac•,r 3. Open si-mccs (233%) 4, Ile have at I!3-ast 45 Fe.:t I.x.twam hAirlin-ts r -ta hAIA.tnmi am two s tr)r7 6. 'An cn. jlnta recrantion centers .~ie mll.rrrinn drift t is to ah^x� .aang4o .•x- hrvm mnvle t� imt3rrria the pr. jcat frCm our. °irrt guE.x is iinn: Planning dit, �I Grc nos Site 7.769 n= 333,530 sf j 11btal allryeable units 39fac 193 193 'fatal mit3 193 192 Bachelor 20 50 One badrrcm 44 6.4 1 TWO Lyz ro ms 129 78 Coverarre Net siW 233,509 283,509 adldi.ng3 91,085 99p4GO Carport3 32 p 400 gavirron 25,920 Pnclui.r l a3,723 '15,650 -8107:3 Pmvifti 59j,903 1.06,390 +46,697 233% t74jen space mnra thin 60,940 ParkincY Pa uira1 331 327 -2 7 Prnvide.3 354 327 -27 1. 1 Imve l.cxlam,l tv! 'nlu': no tIn 1-iroj ct by one million Inl'Iars 2. Runvad 82 berirr-)-m,-. 3. rksraprI 27 ytrkin-j 4. Icrioverl one :arnar.t•~►m t , n i:: I have submi.tte-1 tr-l"irx remrts shrvinq tint the existinrl and at1ditional traffic, to Ran Anneln an3 ialarp will Ix.,. less than 30% of enviromp.ntal capacity and less tlian 10% of acto-A caci-tcity (Itrinrr peak hours of the clay. rhir traFFic r-_nr:incaars, 07,m�ilin--pringl.c & Ass-)✓. trcrr alecte3 t.r.7m :x sirrlt;,ta-1 list given ne 1- the dankinZtn., Beac t 2�-arfic T i.ncars. . 11iis is wx: Inst parc�t to develop on these stm ?ts. Vb are willing to place an 8' high hl.rx l: mall on oar south pm:x.rt v line -it '-fells 1ba:1. 'Ihi.s w3ulrl assura the re►;itl<ants of We.'itr-tin ter that WC3 vintil,1 not: bother them in any t•r:ay. I nnivc. m. t witii the Director. of Riblic t-hrlcs, Planning " Director my3 11cirl of Melineer.inq of Cie City of llesb'dnstar aml trive ooVlzc3 wit), t!ieir cl__sit-es. They raplesterl that i G' h1f7h will be built oil tllc' Cif y l i►m -tn,l L-i,3 streat left: m-i s% Th regar,15 to the pe-t;iti-xi tjf 1I,inL..nr?trjn V.i 1-:1 7 ijts, (mler Assnci=itions: Stnte-1 gnat their sixplmxes gave -m nver,all density og 18 units per acre anr!. d-loy rrypdre t-.h-it our density be lnwere•l to 10 units per aura to mike it si.rtitar. . T would IAJ}a to reply by itltinq that their tmi.trs ara, in tact, -it 24+ units par acre -incl that is all that we ar:-, asl:inn for. 71tis inFormition sus rapestel im l received frcon John Cope, it-.antin-1t:nn Baach Planni.nrr DA.narbm..nt. It might also b4 o; intnrr:,t. to r-cr-ptire t'tn np-iji s»rya.^a pr,-viflol by the Villa Yorba Apt n. V-,f ::-ntr to all thr.;e stnrri b-lildhirrs and a density of. 18 units pr?r. ,icrc xsrl t:3ra able to r,-rni :ip 'vii h 31% npen spico. Compared wit;l our projac-L all b-n stnrl, 317, open sp-tce. 'Ilia mftnls will r.•ancje t $?15.00 for, laaci x3lnrs to $350.00 for t.vX. bedrmm. I Feel text t>~a will. ben Fs3 uri,linrr Hie araa Zn.1 in tb way deval ua t im surro mcii.nel pr:p.3rty, Aftar xti.:td awincl ,all. t` a `acts, I feel t:ia ,ami -is Cie Pl.anninrt trparbmnt:, Planning Cormis.,jinn and City Cbianail di l .-Aian tlia propa:rty vms originally zonal and viaon noti.fic l the city that it tires goinr► t') be for sa13 and they conc►irral with the R-3 Nonin" -tnTtrently her-tune dvit zoning remained. Olentlemen, in conclusior. ill. t'riL I wis,. &3 do is put rho hir;tlest 1ml bent use on tho prop3rry irvl nona mP t:hn r Tt:s thit wo Dive o-M across inclirMten t:h ft them i,s a non-1 For. In.g.9 dan:A L-,r. /)il.cer. y MtFr A. CAR'TR I Itvm s,.*-mi.tta-i tri"'ia raports sh-A,;inrT t-vit the exi.stin-1 and a1dit.innal trial Eie• to San Angell vi:l h1almi will be less thin 50% of envirommnt!il c:40acity and less than 10% or ar.ttral. ca-) city (I-Arinn rx-3k tours of the ckay. Our t:.r.n F`ic nnryimxc r.s, C r rn3lin-Pr.inrrle S Asr;v-c m-re :,elected From -i siirTrtcr:;taI lint rriven m Fy tlir I1•.mt:inrTtr)n Beacli Traffic Fhjineers. 'Ibis is t)v- 1--ist r3arc:r1 to .]evalop nn tliesc sr:rec ts. Vb rare %AUi.nr► to place an 3' hirlh block vrall. on ra•ir south property line at Vblls Tba i. This mild assura the re!ddents nF Vjb!;t*iinster t)-vit tern vniftrl not )ether them in any rny. I n-►vn mat with Wie Dire^t mr. of Pablic 1•brks, Plarminq Director. aml Ilc.:i,-1 o'F Mjine^rinq of t':e City of V'est^dnst:ar anCi I1'ive caVlied tviW, t,ieir ctxsires. They raTaesLerl that. a 6' hi.f7h w.111 I>-- )wilt cn the city 1"inclarl l.ine an-1 Eva :ntract left Tn regarAs to t;ic Ix;tit ion s•itrnitteri 1r1 IIantinritnn Villa 71-)t s. t�ninr P.ssxi7tiona: St it.21 that: their sixplpmes )leave an n-r mil -lamAty n'! 18 units per acre nnri ti:e:y re-foire. t•-hit mir density be lm-A.m l to 19 units per ncre to mika it simi.l..-ir. T would Ulm to reply by sntinm that their units ara, in fact, -it 24+ units par acra vul that is ell that we am askinn For. . This inForiritinn cans ragaest sl anal recebA-. l Ercx:, Jolm Cn:�-, Iiuntin^rton R:2.ich PlT nrr Departnnt. It mirlht -Usr) )>w nr intnre-4t tr, r n np:ire time n;ii,r s,?arena pr-),Arlel b}, thtl Villa Yorba Aptn. `1':1n1 ..rant to all thrae story bulcliticrS anal i �lenni}�4 of 18 units per. •-rrre: aml v-ara ahl.e to "-a tip witli 31% cr�en spar:-. U-4q?ared wiEi our project: :all b-n story, 31% open sj.-ice. The mntals will ran-'te' $?15.00 For h,lc:telors t o $350.00 �nr- tea-) bedrorxn3 I Feel. t,vat iv-- will Ira a lit rT the c? y. rrtr > iG area an , ut no way devalue eiu_, surmindinq prop-ar ty. 1!Ft er revia•rincr .all. em facta, T: feel tie s.-me -is t;ae Pli-tnninr7 Mp-rrtnent:, Planni.nrr G,mission -inrl City Cotinctl di::1 *.><ieli tie property ins crirr.in-ill y .orh:r1 aml -mien Ca.lTrvls notiFici the city t)t:t it eras chin-r tro le �nr scale ind they concur.•ral with the R-3 .oninm ap,,yirently b-mar me. that zoninn rcmainal. Clenticwn, in conrlu5i.on all. t'rat. X Wish to do is put the fii.- .7lumst zn i bent gat-m on tho pmtrrty and mna nr tho F3r:t:g that we have o-m -tr rnss imli.riates ghat tarn i•3 a nor--I rnr less density. ?:rVT-.;S It. CA.. .I? FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF USE PERMIT NO. 76-12 1. The proposed 193 unit apartment development is in conformance_ with the applicable development standards of the R3 zoning on the subject property. 2. The design and layout of the project has mitigated the size, srape and orientation of the subject property as it relates to the adjacent freeway and multiple residential units. . 3. The access to the project and the traffic to be generated therefrom will not be detrimental to the health, welfare, and safety of those persons residing in adjacent development. 4. The project has been designed so as it significantly mitigate the noise emanating from the adjacent freeway traffic and the total security concept w-.11 help mitigate any resultant crime problems. ^ f • L L � 1 I i t ACOUSTICAL SIGHT- LINE ANALYSIS 1 f� j 1 E T00 DEN5TY GRAPE GOO s i l P"SIOLC UAdI" . R3 2CM PrR AC 579 Soo 433 i 4 4 2 Qcss,sl UNDER..........._. 1 417 #a VVITs PER tic 400 3 3 �•3 6 T PLAN Yxr SUOMITTED I" 354 aWifS -�_ '450 REVISED Fi.t,N__„„__� 345 _ .327 322 / l ` 30 `— FINAL PLAN A}tai.e s'ei�+W .. •7 / �- 200. 193 � `�` �i : �t SR I I O d. 49 •'� �� �� 2 SR 2. t I 2.30 �� f .t0 138 •' \ � � `♦ �� / VALUE lJ3E0 F6ff rARAR•T' loo , ARK FEES TORI DENSITY O UNIrs PARKING; BEDROOMS CHILDRI:N TOTAL POPULA7rICA) D LENSTt GRAFT 8 T passl+aac cru 'R_ R3 gOQ 24.89 FER .I►C 5T9 5UO 483 4 2 4 7 t8 UNITS PSR AC 400 38 3 8 7 PLAN Isr ,SUM11TED 354 RE SED PLC 3-4 r' 327 �- 322 i 300 f/NAL PLAN ADULT twLY 3 ? 3rA ......r. ;93 tlN�S 270 4 ot l O 2$�6 ��0� ��4Y 1 200 193 �•, �/ 51#lit ! 1 O 1.18 4DJf Z,-OR 2 2 i 2L30 R3 z 15.10 ♦ �j / VALUE USEW rOR QRAsrr I Q O �� !� TAKEN FROM W-M 7PAAKro ES_1DEN Y FXCSff J timirs PARKINQ sMooMS CMIWRE lv TOTAL POPULATION TTm; T• Car.for 1.21 Pbyy-al !yak Itr»ci Acvuhn-: m, C3 92007 April 30, 1976 - rr:IVED I1nmr�l-;le City CocmCil CitI of Ihintinr►tr n IV-ac`t Iiuntinc tm a Pr xcii, Cn a . n2 I first laecarre with this nrnrnrty carry in necr-y1mr 1.97i. Imking It t�11a L}1r^cl. `.�l.t t'1�� it is �.��':11 lry,-rite.-I fnr. an P� pnnject: ber-►use it is c wVati.hle wit:i a•_1rrn•ulcUiq builrlim is, it, c l-o3c tnczti.on to shnppinq and eatinrt pl ace am.l "rn- Seca�s Lo the �'ruaw a�� `nr ��V) 0 r:7t7ting �v1�1 rining to work. On Wca Oer. 9, 1975 1 d iec}:c:•1 wit1 t:he rla n.inrt D aparixt nt: m-1 t-Ol'o—1 t^ Serc7.in and he told ,nr " .,-i r it cis z nncl R--1 -vi l th-it the n-,wro wl i.nr7 ,prr�xerty in It_ulti.nrrt�n al nn 11--3. He (lid !Jtzte to rm 'At th-It tim- that lac Felt. :h:re r:n.ill be gri-:zt: o,�-nition fr•>n t'c.sL•"ni.nster.. Other tuari trLat ,-ie felt t-hit the L:)rop:irt~y mull he InvelopeI -as It-1. After the p.r(--xwty onnt t•-) bi.tl -in•l wan: sucress9d in gaL•tinct tha, bid, we omparal a ,3rr x),m1. to :le roloi) the pr'rper.trj. Vb wont t o tan Pre-- sub4ttll 30.8 io1Yn tr, eta}:e our. crv► -jlex -rq)l.y with the ciL-y's rcrjai.rawnts. an I'ekar<azra► 18 v, s►clxn'tte.'l mu* prnkxmil to ti1r3 navirormintzl. laview Niarr1, • ,an.1 it pw4r.crl. 'i",van it: went t:► tlua Pnarct ng 7nni.n-t A:lillstmnts %,A1er:a it sill hacl nnme minmr 3rohl.aa3 t:aat: m•it,l 1m hut< t hare wan, ntill oppanitinn arms 1_iaa narrow ltart r0,3 lnnte. It %ns sent~ up to alto pl.annbirl cam asion set ror. April 19, 1916. 11hare wns s-m mnfusion -is 0 the nizraer of plans to be an 1 vA-- .mro ". short~ to strioplying enorzrlh for all. the ccrcrtissionar:3. On Vrid-ay h&ore the meetinrr, .a.culit:ion:al plans wera supplied. :91e c;ixrds.sioncra than rTieste:l a tkm uael: c1cl.ay for the hearing ,m,l I w7reecl. At Uvit: Uri-- they Aid not print to lierir nmr �aCtri r.3ft,~aininrl to t►t!2 car3c: and nmid it. cnul-1 tr. tae•ar.,-1 1-itor. , on 'icy •1t11. Ch April 27th T vm, ri-O a awara or the f.-cn4 that t► a Planrainq Cramrnission Later that ni.rriit, nFtar I l�aFt vit.e l cumi-minly to raquest: t11a City (buncil to enact n wr•itmri•xn on twiis nr:raperty. rbntlemn, I nn hare.: Lo. (In iiwit T tried to In in tho past, gleaci my case pewt•ain.t r .:0 'irw iri-Yl t:ho prnio^.t. i,. rbst cal' thri ixn- pin so to br viell, otnlnizel to firt:it the tam j v:t on crnt:_i.ons, b•.lt t ho F--ict is I have de.,Aam--1 one nF Lv! best crfVlc:es In I1 lntin'Ttnn Peach frryn Ulu! r I. Securiyt Rat-ter �ror. pn1imx.- c'o-prirt-Tmt itatinq t 2hat it will. W one nF Eic safest in t'zre city) 2. Privacwy 3. Opmeen S,klce?g (233$) 4. fie have -it 1 o,st 4!3 Feet 1otvm.an h-Alslim s ::5. The 1jui lAimy:s are tm s tor4, 6. 'An cr7rp1nta rocrintl.nn cantors The follrvinrr dr-rrt it trn ;hm r.'amrTes va h*i,m TR-10q t:n ir�provo the project F.rcm our. I:ir:nt sutrnissir:,ti: Plannim DZta Gross Site 7.769 nn 333,590 st: 7htal. allmicible mir:3 .)4.39,/.ic 193 193 Tat, l unit-3 193 1911 Rachaloe 20 50 One h"Irocn- 44 6.1 Tyra l�:�lr:cxm5 1.29 78 (bVerarre ?-let situ 283 f509 283,509 Bpi'ldi;vr� 91.0085 89,4G0 Gtu. T.nrt:3 320400 garaemen 25,920 22M 5 Icon n*-rairei 53,725 -15,650 -81073 1'-rnv�.cl 1 59,903 3 06,390 +46,G87 233% Open srx- rmr.� then r.;c1urr�i G4,9,3p Parklnn 1� tiro►1 331 327 -27 r'xr�vicl�rl 354 327 -27 1. I Iwo tmiare:l t to nilin of projrrt by ow million rinll rs 2. ronovacl 82 boirorms 3. Iarrve'1 27 ytrklr spices 4. ramv&l one a trtmint itnit . 3 Tit of CIVIC CENTER 8200 WESTMINSTER AVENUE [ Wr:NGTON !,EACH WESTM INSTER, CALIFORNIA 92683 KANN!NQ DEPARTMENT 714 CODI+ 898.3311 March 3, 1976 NAR 4 t97re P. 0. sox le, Environmental Review Board IJunlin&n Beach, C.. City of Huntington Beach P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 ATTENTION: Mr. Melvin A. Tooker Subject: NO-76-11 Acting Secretary UP 7612 Gentlemen: The City of Westminster has reviewed the Preliminary Environmental Impact bocument submitted for the construction of 193 apartment units to be located immediately south of the San Diego Free--,,ay, north of Wells Road. It is our opinion that the construction of a high density residential project adjacent to existing log,+ density residential development in the City of Westminster would be detrimental for the following reasons: 1 . The Traffic Report submitted indicates approximately 5 to 10 percent of the total project would utilize Wells Road as primary access. It is our opinion that approximately 40 to 50 perc:;nt. would utilize Wells Road as their primary access . We do not believe the social , noise, and safety impact created by the additional 600 to 700 vehicles per day through Wells Road has been thoroughly addressed. 2. The Traffic Report also indicates that streets located within Huntington Beach are capable of handling additional traffic generated by the proposed project. The City of Westminster opposes vehicular access between the proposed project and the existing low density . residential development, due to the increased traffic levels it would generate in a residential neighborhood on streets not designed as collector streets for through traffic. We would not oppose access for emergency vehicles only. Very truly yours, `Roeert J. Hu tley City Ad istrator RJH:vh , 1 0 !'= 1 POLICE DEPARTMENT City oIn"Junti ton Beach P.O.IIU7i 70 . 2000 MAIN STREET.tIUN7lNCTAN IlGACIt.CA.926.58 7'lrL,(714) 536-53 t1 �'. EARLE ROBITAILLE 0ief of Police April 30, 1976 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: On April 29 I was contacted by Mr. James Carter who indicated that he desired to build some apartment buildings at the east ei)d of San Angelo Drive. Mr. Carter presented a Plot Plan for this group of apartments and stated his intention to prcvide excellent security for the area. Security precaut4ons would include a limited access gate at the north end of the apartment complex, limiting access to residents only. There would be a telephone at that location for the use of visitors in contacting residents. Five closed-circuit television cameras would be located in the garage area, focusing on the apart- ment parkxny lot. All doors would be equipped with deadbult Locks, and all windows would be those having additional locking mechanisms. Mr. Carter asked the undersigned his opinion of the proposed security plan and was advised that it was excellent and offered the apartment complex very good security. � f M. Relic Police and Public Affairs MRsbb -- Ad css a.; corn) lnnications to the Cbicf of Police --- • ]IL�ClE'. Grove 1.16. 1.23 Royal Oak Rd. Anah6im, Calif 97807 1976 • fa �'cti f y. Honorable City Council: IZegarrding Use Permit #76-12 � We feel that our project cutpli.es .in Every tvay AU, P1arLning Cade in Huntington Heacli and it would not be injurious to tM surrounding property cxmers or the =m=ity. We wish to appeal the decision of the Planning Ccxmussion cn May 4, 1976. Sincerely, sTPpce G/jJ(�, Inc. n r� r Grp May 14, 1976 1 TO: Huntington Beach City Council SUBJECT: Permit No. 76-12 1 . The projLct is designed in compliance with the adjacent 198-unit project and to the apartment complex to the West as well as to the existing R-1 single family home construction along Wells Rd. This project will considerably reduce the existing noise and traffic emissions that now exist in that area--we will put a 16•-ft . high noise attenuation wail which will protect resident3 from emissions and sound that now comes from the freeway . 2. We feel. that the design and layout of the 193-unit apartment com- plex is in compliance with the Planning Reserve Designation of 1975, as we feel the inient is not to prohibit development but merely -to designate the parcel as deserving of a comprehensive review. We felt that we have accomplished this by our traffic , accoustical reports and along with our layout , we have worked this out very well . 3. In regards to the project 's design with its orientation to the freeway, we have handled these problems very adequately . We have gone completely with our accoustical report by J. J . Van Houten and Associates and complied with the wishes on that report . We have turned our buildings so that they are perpen- dicular to the freeway which is giving us the minimum noise level in our units . We have no units with window-c facing the freeway and r.ith our noise attenuation wall , we have completely solved the problems than existed, and should make it a very desirable apartment complex to live in . 4. We have submitted a traffic report covering this project . We feel tke report is adequate. Crommeli.n-Pringle & Assoc . was suggested by your own Traffic Department . The.,e was 1 report and 2 amendments to the report to give a full and complete amount of information desired. You will find in the traffic report that at no time are we even getting close to any of the limitations on the roads that now exist and we cannot understand the problem where %e now have 300 and some signatures on letter petitions against this project , where in facia , it will only pass 13 sixplexes on its way, alone a short street one quarter mile lone, to Beach Boulevard. 5. This size and shape piece of property being 200 ft . by 1800 ft . long is highly desirable for developing this type of problem and has no problem in getting this amount of units on it . In .rC. Huntington 'Bea.ch City Council May 140 1976 fact , we have been .able to accomplish an open space of approxi- mately 2J times what is required by the City--our buildings are 45 ft . apart instead of 25 ft . apart as required by the City and our building coverage is able to be at about 38% compared to 50% required by the City . These are not statistics that are generated by a problem piece of property . In fact , we have great freedom in design. The only restrictions we have on design are to place our buildings so that they are perpendicular to the freeway to allow the least amount of noise problem Zo affect the units, and we have accomplished this . The other unique part of this property is we have virtually no property loss to streets. By doing this we have been able to turn what normally would be streets into open green areas . T)- at really enhances this project and sets it aside as probably one of the best pro- jects by the numbers that has been put ;n this City so far . On top of all this , we have achieved this by going only 2 stories . There is no 3-story building on this site. 6. I would like to call to your attention the fact that we really plan to build a very desirable project in your City . Our project will be designed better , more money spent per unit , and achieve better goals than the surrounding property has achieved. We are going to use one of the best landscape architects in Southern California, Robert Weaver. I will be glad to show you some of the man ' s work. He is a genius at turning a project into a park- like setting . You already '.lave some of his work in the City . I would urge you to go take a look at the property just on the other side of where our project will be off Beach Boulevard, straight across Stark on the left side as Stark ends . (La faint., Ant) Please take a look at this project and see what we are trying to achieve in your City . I think after seeing and realizing what we are after , you will feel that you would like a project like this in your City . What we are asking for is merely this: To allow us to have a project which is designed with your zone R-3 ; in fact , we have increased it in every way we can and still remain with our 103 units because we want to apply money back into the project in landscaping of the project and putting up an adequate barrier to the freeway so that this project is set aside and is made desirable for the people living in the project and that it does enhance your community . I 'm sincere in this statement . I think when the project is finished, you will realize that I 'm not out after quick money to cut this up into small lots. I 'm out to build a project that I will own for a long time and something I can be proud of and you can be proud of also . Ank yo Zes A. Carte SPRUCE GROVE , INC. OFF Ok ��.... "Y Huntington Beach Planning Commisaion P.O. BOX ISO CALIFORNIA 92648 TO; HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: kAn' ning Commission DATE: May 27 , 1976 AT'LN: Floyd G. Belsito, .Acting City Administrator RE: Use Permit No. 76-12 : A22eal to Denial . APPLICANT: James A. Carter 121 Royal Oak Rd. Ana:;eim, California -• LOCATION: South side of San Diego Freeway at east end of Gar: Angelo Drive. REQUEST: To permit the construction of 193 unit apartment complex . PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: ON MOTION BY SHEA AND SECOND BY PARKINSON USE PERMIT NO. 76-12 WAS DENIED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: 1. The project as designated with the 193 units will be injurious to the apartment complex existing to the west as well as to the existing Rl single-family homes constructed along Wells Road. 2. The design and layout of this 193 unit apartment project is not in cempliar,ce with the Planning Reserve desia_nation placed on the property in 1975, as the purpose of this designat'�,'on was to allow the City to more thoroughly analyze the prope•rt-p4or alter- native land uses . 3 . The project as designed with its orientation immediately adjaot -` i to the freeway will subject more poeple to noise and automobile' emissions under the intensity as proposed. i Use Permit No. 76-12: Appeal to Denial Page 2 4. The project as designated having only one drive entry to serve this . 193 unit complex will have a detrimental effect and create safety problems in cases of emergency to persons residing in the vicinity as well as those residing within the complex. i 5. • The size and shape of the property, being only an average of 200± feet wide by some 1800 feet lorig is not suitable for this intensity of use as proposed on the site plan submitted . AYES: Parkinson, Bazil , Finley, Slates , Shea , Boyle, Kerins NOES: None ABSENT: None. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends denial of Use Permit No. 76-12 . SUMMARY OF STAFF REPORT: Use Permit No. 76--12 is a request to permit the construction of a 193 unit apartment complex on a 7 . 769 acre parcel of land. The subject property was recently acquired from the State Department of Transportation after had been declared surplus freeway property . The Board of Zoning Adjustments originally reviewed Use Permit No . 76-12 at its March 17 , 1976 meeting, and after a lengthy discussion referred it to the Planning Commission at the request of the applicant, as there had been numerous requests by adjacent property owners in the area for a night meeting. The applicant has submitted a number of revised plans with the final submittal indicating conformance with the appropriate development standards . Specifically, the major requirements breakdown, as follows : Gross Acreage: 338 , 058 s . ft . Net Acreage: 288 , 000 sq. f t. Units per gross acre: Permitted: 24 . 89 Proposed: 24 . 89 'total Units.: 193 r r, Use Permit No. 76-•12 : Appeal to Denial Page 3 Floor Area and Type of Units : Type "A" 50 Single 505 sq. ft./unit Type "B" 65 1 Br. 712 sq. ft ./unit Type "A-F" 78 2 Br. 1010 - 1070 sq. ft,/unit Open Space: Total Required: 45 , 850 sq. ft, Total Proposed: 95 , 000 sq. ft. Site Coverage: Permitted: 50% -gross/ac. Proposed: 40% ADDITONAL INFORMATION: Use Permit No. 76-12 was originally reviewed by the Planning Commission at their April 20 , 1976 meeting . However, due to the fact that additional traffic information was presented on the night of the meeting, the Commission with the concurrence of the applicant, con- tinued the matter to the next regular meeting. The Commission at its meeting of May A , 1976 discussed the proposed plan in detail, incliding the issue of access to the project .. its effect on surrounding properties , and the proposed tensity of the project in terms of its size and location . During the public hearing on the inatte.:, Mr. Jim Carter, the applicant,' addressed the Commission and spoke in favor of the proposal. Mr. Cordon Kramer, Mr. Ron Kelly and Ms . Susan Stand, spoke in opposition to the project . Legal nutification was sent out to all property owners within a 300 foot radius of the subject property, as well as all persons whose signatures appeared on the attached petition. 7yJ . r ' Use Permit No. 76-12: Appeal to Denial Page 4 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : On March 91 1976, thu Environmental Review Board granted Negative Declaration No. 76-11, having found that the project wiiI not have a significant adverse effect upon the physical environment . The Environmental Review Board' s recommendations to minimize the impact of accumulative developments of this nature in this general vicinity are attached herewith in its transmittal. The Board recommends approval of Negative Declaration 76-11 by the City Council . SUPPORTING INFORMATION: 1. Area Map 2. Staff Report 3. Traffic Report 4. Petition of those in opposition Reslard fully subm' ted, i Ri A. Harlow Secretary RAH/JC/jh i EnVIROnMEnTAL , REVIEW BOARD CITY OF HUNTINGTON BAH•CALIFORNIA ' R O. BOX 190.92648 TO: Beard of Zoning Adjustments FROM' Environmental Review Board DATE: March 9 , 1976 SUBJECT: Negative Declaration No. 76-11 (UP 76-12) APPLICANT: James A. Carter PROJECT: 193-unit apartment complex LOCATION: Subject property is located at the east end of San Angelo Drive . The Environmental Review Board, at its meeting of March 9 , 1976 , granted the above negative declaration, having found that the proposed project will not have a significant adverse effect upon_ the physical environment. No environmental impact report has been prepared for this project. Findings are based upon the information contained in the negative declaration request and su elementary information thereto, discus- ' sion by this Board, and the following recommendations: 1. If the developer proposes to provide air conditioning, the 1 a insulation in ceilings and exterior walls shall 1 be a minimum of R-19 and R-11 , respectively. If no air conditioning is to be provided, the insulation in ceilings and exterior walls shall be a minimum of R-13 and R-7, respectively. 2 . All building spoils , such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material , shall be disposed of at: an offsite facility equipped to handle them. 3. Natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at the loc- ation of clothes dryers, and natural gas shall Le stubbed in at the locations of cooking fa--ilities , water heaters , and central heating units . 4. The recommendation of the traffic consultant, limiting access on Wells Road to emergency vehicles only, should be incorporated into the project design. S. All ro-.ommendations made on noise control by the applicant' s noisy. -onsultant should be incorporated into the project design. Melv A. ook r, Acting Secretary Environmental Review Board :df , Minutes, y.B.. Board of zoning Adjustments March 17 , 1976 Page 6 USE PERMIT NO. 76-12 Applicant: James A. Carter To permit the construction of a 193-unit apartment complex pursuant to: Secti.on 9202 . 3 . 1 . 3 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code , loc- ated on the south side of the San Diego Freeway at the east end of San Angelo Drive in an R3 , medium-High Density Resid ential District. The Chairman informed the Board that Negative Declaration No. 76-1.1 was granted for this request by the Environmental Review Board on March 9 , 1976. James Carter was present at the meeting . Secretary Palin submitted a petition which has been received from nearby property owners in opposition to the project . The Chairman opened the public hearing . Mr. Carter addressed the Board, explaining his project and expressinq his willingness to work with adjacent residents and the City to effect a development which will not be adverse to surrounding areas. Gordon Kramer, representing the Huntington Villa Apartment Owners ' Association, addressed the Board in opposition to the proposed pro j::ct. Mr. Kramer cited the high density factor of the development and the impacts the increased number of units in the area would have on traffic flow on Stark Street, with its increased traffic danger to children and added noise pollution of the neighborhood. He also based his objection on overcrowding, impact on schools , and possible increased criminal. activity in the area , and questioned the :source of financing for the project. Others in the audience added their support for Mr. Kramer ' s position. There being no other persons present to speak for or against the proposed project , the public hearing was closed. Board discussion ensued . Secretary Paain reviewed the history of the subject site, and listed areas in which the proposed plan .is not in compliance with the Ordinance Code. The densities proposed were discussed, as well as the projected traffic counts as they relate to noise and safety. It was the consensus of the Board that this request should be continued for revision of the plans; however, after dis- cussiton of the procedure and time frame involved, the applicant requested that his project be referred directly to the Planning Commission for its consideration . ON MOTION BY PALIN AND SECOND BY LIPPS , USEPERMIT H0. 76-12 WAS REFERRED TO THE PLANNING C=4ISSION MEETING OF APRIL 20 , 19760 AT THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT, BY ThE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: PALIN, CROSBY, LIPPS NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE BZA 3-17-7 6 Page 6 Publication .3.. .. ^• „„, _......�. ,,, -' n,1,. '"fir. Artate of Catomitl ;:ounty of Orange ss City of Huntington Beach t Georne Farquhar, beirs duly sworn on oath, says: That he is a cltixan of the united States, over the age of twenty-one yearn. That be Is the printer and publisher of the Huntington Beach Now#, a weekly newspaper of general circulation printed and pub. -- y lished in Huntington Beach, California and cireulRted in the said Q County of Orange and elsewhere and published for Me dtra ndmtlon of local and other news of it general character, and has a bona fl& subscription list of paying sul acribers, and said paper has been established, printed and published in the State o: California, and County of Orange, for at least one year next before the publication at the first Insertion of this notice; and the said newspaper Is net devoted to the Interest of, or published for the entertainment of any particular class, profession, trade, calling, race or denominatlon, or any number thereof, t �tvat t1►ti„ g, i6h ' The Huntington Beach New was adjudicated x legal newspaper *�! `Sr of general circulation by Judge G. X Scovel In the Superior Court Of Orange County, California August 27th, 1937 by order No. A-5931. t HE it "W''s pap:: That the APPEAL TO DENIAL 9Z pp � �► USE ?Ewgx_ 76—,12 ,tto ctvfq of which the annexed is a printed copy, was published In said -sews- r '0"14 r' th at(' 49Yde+�thtt paper at last 0 d 1819110 n •ram+ +� t .a: ems► .t ' to It.1ha fn ca -4»• in Unit apd/tlrwlr; OMt3AMe t fYlUWA to Sktkkt ca;nmencing from the 27�rh day of _ B I �� ern t�W'A 8Wh ordUurncr r tn+bE*et awrrty•is•toast Con �Ed�IwitA y Of th. p•n tiAW Frrrrwy. 14 and ending on the ..22 th day of _ �' t •r4.0 •err► Mseka Brim in 1410h Ctnstq► &Wderttlarl .� 1p1►1 'do�c+lirl— is an fl1M 3926— ., both days inclusive, and as often during said period arxi �- ad sons 00.. Ylted to times of publication as said paper was regularly issued, and in the 'hearing. WW'dos u»ir regular and entire issue of said pewspaper proper, and not Ina r M'' °r ^� seta qal. Lrr"W10" may pe OW111ad supplement, and said notice was published therein an the following �ti�hi t„ tticit of tt,e city mark. C:atjM to-wit: DATE�lr' . Ww'u, tn�� May 27 GTy of u gE CH �.,, 1916 A N H Wt►+*wt • :n act. M. .r+tway, Cltr Vork Publisher Subscribed and sworn to before tyre this 28 th day of May_ 106 -----�• �1""� ,��� �'� Notary Public Orange County, California ` THOMAS D. WYLUE I "artery rUWie-Calhondo 11 Orange Codify i •• Mp Com+nfr�fae laat►aa � � SeRfaetlrer t2, 1i7! ................. ............... • ,.; �J .r+w:,w..'l ±kf"t.hs'Y.�t�.1lMibw�rl�Il`M f.AitM+tiAs'fsr...t.,.. i ••. r '.. .: .,. '3 Spruce Inc. 121 t_bya l al. r'JW)eim, Calif 92d07 htay 12 .1976 w Ci lianorable City Council: " •• J*Ogardiw-., Use Permit #76--12 We feel that Our project canplies in every way With Planning Code in ttuntincltOn Beach and it would not be inJurious to the surrounding arty rAmer.3 or Cie omrunity, I*,.- trim to tppe11 Uie decisim of the PlannilW Ctinnisaion cn ktay 41, 1976. Sincercly, SP rl Inc. '7 A: r' V.P. Z 4 I May 14 , 1976 Hunt iagton Beach City Council SUBJECT: Permit No . 76-12 � S 1 . The project is designed in compliance with the adjacent lab-unit project and to the apartment complex to the west as well as to the existing R--1 single family home construction along Wells Rd. This project will considerably reduce the existing noise and traffic emissions that now exist in that area.--we will put a 16-ft . high noise attenuation wall which will protect residents from emissions and sound that now comes from the freeway. 2. We feel that the design an.' layout of the 193-unit apartment com- plex is in compliance with the Planning Reserve Designation of 1975, as we feel the intent is not to prohibit development but merely to designate the parcel as deserving of a comprehensive review. We felt that we have accomplished this by our traffic , accoustical reports and along with our layout , we have -worked this out very well . 3. In regards to the project 's design with its orientation to the freeway , we have handled these problems very adequately. We Have gone completely with our accoustical report by J . J . Van Houten and Associates and complied with the wishes on that report . We have turned our buildings so that they are perpen- dicular to the freeway which is giving us the minimum noise level In our units. We have no units with windows facing the freeway and with our noise attenuation wall , we have completely solved the problems that existed, and should make it a very desirable apartment complex to live in . 4 . We have submitted a traffic report covering this project . We feel the report is adequate. Crommelin-Pringle & Assoc. was suggested by your own Traffic Department . There was 1 report and 2 amendments to the report to give a full and compl. tte amount of information desired . You will find in the traffic report that at no time are we even getting close to any of the limitations on the roads that now exist and we cannot understand the problem where we now have 300 and some signatures on letter petitions against this project , where it fact , it will only puss 13 sixplexes on its way, alone a s:.art street one quarter mile lone, to Beach Boulevard. 5. This size and shape pie;e of property being 200 ft . by 1800 ft . long is highly desirable for deve�oping this type of problem and has no problem in getting this amount of units on it . In \ t Huntington Beach City Council May 14 , 1976 fact , we have been able to accomplish an open space of approxi- mately 2J times what is required by the City--our buildings are 45 ft . apart instead of 25 ft . apart as required by the City and our building coverage is able to be at about 38% compared to 5070 required by the City. These are not statistics that are generated by a problem piece of property . In fact , we have great freedom in design. The only restrictions we have on design are to place our buildings ' so that they are perpendicular to the freeway to allow the least amount of noise problem to affect the units, and we have accomplished this . The other unique part of this property is we have virtually n.d property loss to streets. By doing this we have been able to turn whaw normally would be streets into open green areas . That really enhances this project and sets it aside as probably one of the best pro- jects by the numbers that has been put in this City so far. On top of all this, we have achieved this by going (3iily 2 stories. There is no 3--story building on this site. 6. I would like to call to your attention the fact that we really plan to build a very desirable project in your City . Our project will be designed better, more money spent per unit , and achieve better goals than the surrounding property has achieved. We are going to use one of the best landscape architects in Southern California, Robert Weaver . I will be glad to show you some of the man ' s work. He is a genius at turning a project into a park- like setting. You already hari some of his work in the City . I would urge you to go take a look at the property just on the other side of where our project will be off Beach Boulevard, straight across Stark on the left side as Stark ends. (La nuinti A-Q i Please take a look at this project and see what we are trying to achieve in your City. I think after seeing and realizing what we are after , you will feel that you would like a project like this in your City. What we are asking for is merely th%s : To allow us to have a project which is designed with your zone R-3; in fact , we have increased it in every way we can and still remain with our 193 units because we want to apply money back into the project in landscaping of the project and putting up an adequate barrier to the freeway so that this project is set aside and is made desirable for the people .ivin in the project and that it does P P B P j enhance your community . I 'm sincere in this statement . I think when the project is finished , you will realize that I 'm not out after quick money to cut this •!p into small lots . I 'm out to build a project that I will own for a long tiwe and something I can be proud of and you cau be proud of Also. ank yquI7 James A. Carter ,/ SPRUCE GROVE, INC. ..,•, Huntington Beach Planning Commission d. .....►�r P.O. Box 190 CALIFORNIA 926" TO: hnNORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: k"lanning Commission DATE: May 27 , 1976 ATTU: Floyd G. Belsito, Acting City Administrator RE: Use Permit No. 76-12: Appeal to Denial APPLICANT: James A. Carter 121 Royal. Oak Rd. Anaheim, California • LOCATION: South side of San Diego Freeway at east end of Sari Angelo Drive. REQUEST: To permit the construction of 193 unit apartment complex. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: I ON MOTION BY SHEA AND SECOND BY PARXTNSON USE PERMIT NO. 76--12 WAS DENIED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: I . The project as designated with the 193 unite will be injurious to the apartment complex existing to the west as well as to the existing R1 single-family homes constructed along Wells toad. 2. The design and layout of this 193 unit apartment project is in compliance with the Planning Reserve designation placed on ot the property in 1975, as the purpose of this designation was to allow the City to more thoroughly analyze the property ,far alter- native land uses . 3 . The project as designed with its orientation immediately ad jraaept to the freeway will subject more poeple to noise and automobile ) emissions under the intensity as proposed. :4L Use Permit No. 76-12 : Appeal to Denial Page 2 4 . The project as designated having only one drive entry to serve this 193 unit complex will have a detrimental effect and create safety problems in cages of emergency to persons residing in the vicinity as well as those residing within the complex., 5. The size and shape of the property,. being only an average of 200- feet wide by some 1800 feet long is not suitable for this intensity of use as proposed on the site plan submitted. AYES: Parkinson, Bazil, Finley, Slates, Shea, Boyle, Kerins NOES: None ABSENT: None PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commiss4.on recommends denial. of Use Permit No. 76-12. SUMMARY OF STAFF REPORT: Use Permit No. 76--12 is a request to permit the construction of a 193 unit apartment complex on a 7 . 769 acre parcel of land. The subject property was recently acquired from the State Department of Transportation after had been declared surplus freeway property. The Board of Zoning Adjustments originally reviewed Use P;,rmit No. 76-12 at its :March 17 , 1976 meeting, and after a lengthy discussion referred it to the Planning Commission at the request of the applicant, as there had been numerous raquests by adjacent property ovmers in the area for a night meeting. The applicant has submitted a number of revised plans with the final submittal indicating conformance with the appropriate development standards . Specifically, the major requirements breakdown as follows: Gross Acreage: 33� 8 , 058 sq. ft. Net Acreage: 288, 000 sq. ft. Units per gross acre: Permitted: 24 .89 Proposed: 24 . 89 Total Units: 133 gpy+Lsy• . . ,+i .. ... ., ,� — ,.._-.�_. ....... ..may...,•►...,.... Use Pei.nit No. 76-12: Appeal to Denial Page 3 Floor Area and Type of. Units; Type "A" 50 Single 505 sq. ft./unit Type, "B" 65 1 Sr. 712 sq, ft./unit Type "A-F" 79 2 Br. 1010 - 1070 sq. ft./unit Open Space: Total Required; 45, 850 sq. ft. Total Proposed: 951000 sq. ft. Site Coverage: Permitted: 50$ grossZac. Proposed: 40% ADDITONAL INFORMATION: Use Permit No. 76-12 was originally reviewed by the Planning Commission at their April 20, 1976 meeting. However, due to the fact that additional traffic information was presented on the night of the meeting, the Commission with the concurrence of the applicant, con- tinued the matter to the next regular meeting. The Commission at its meeting of May 4 , 1976 discussed the proposed plan in detail, including the issue of access to the project, its effect on surrounding properties, and the proposed density of the project in terms of its size and location. During the public hearing on the matter, Mr. Jim Carter, the applicant, addressed the Commission and spoke in favor of the proposal. Mr. Gordon Kramer, Mr. Ron Kelly and Ms. Susan Stand, spoke in opposition to the project. Legal notification wan sent out to all property owners within a 300 foot radius of the subject property, as well as all persons whose signatures appeared on the attached petition. /1 Use Permit Ne . 76-12 : Appeal to Denial Page 4 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: On March 9 , 1976 , the Environmental Review Board granted Negative Declaration No. 76--11, having found that the project will not have a significant adverse effect upon the physical environment. The Environmental Review Board' s recommendations to minimize the impact of accumulative developments of this mature in this general vicinity are attached herewith in its transmittal . The Board recommends approval of Negative Declaration 76-11 by the City Council . SUPPORTING INFORMATION: 1 . Area Map 2 . Staff Report 3. Traffic Report 4 . Petition of those in opposition Resp fully subm3(tted , its. and A. Harlow Secretary RAH/JC/jh i PIKXV de�parto nt nt staff 11poll- TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: APRIL 20, 1976 USE PERMIT NO. 76-12 (XV7V= 13Y FyW APPLICANT: James A. Carter ZONE: R-3 121 Royal Oak Rd. Anaheim, Ca. LOCATION: South side of San Diego Freeway at east and of San Angele Dr. REQUEST: To permit the construction of 193 unit apartment complex 1. 0 GENERAL INFORMATION: Use Permit 76-12 , filed on February 18, 1976 , is a request to permit -the construction of a 193-unit apartment complex on a 7 . 769 acre parcel of land located on the south side of the San Diego Freeway at the east end of San Angelo Drive , on the southeast side of Edinger Avenue and Beach Boulevard. The Hoard of Zoning Adjustments originally reviewed Use Permit 76-12 at its March 17 , 3.976 , meeting and after a lengthy discussion referred it to the Aril 20 Planninq Commission meeting at the request of the applicant, as there had been requests by property owners in the area for a night meeting. Referral was also made because the original plan submitted to the Hoard had little chance of approval without revision, as the site plan was not in ccmpliance with Article 932 (Apartment Standards) on requirements such as assigned parking , walking distance to parking spaces , and open space for five of the second story units. 2. 0 LAND UEE AND ZONING : Subject property is zoned R3 , Medium Family Residential , and is vacant at this time. This property was purchased by the State for the 39 Freeway interchange at the time when the property to the south was being developers into an apartment complex. The property is bounded on the north by the San Diego Freeway. The property locateA along the southerly tip of the proposed project is zoned R1 and developed with single-family dwellings . These homes are located within the City of Westminster. ALL .. woo ,6e. Permit 76--12 Page 2 The properties along the southwest and west boundaries of subject property are. zoned R3 and developed as an apartment complex, as well as apartments on individual lots . 3.0 GEWERhL PLAN: The band Use Element of the General Plan has subject property designated as a planning reserve, which sets forth provisions for property to be developed pursuant to the existing zoning on the property. - 4 . 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : i On March 9, 1976, tha Environmental Review Board granted Negative Declaration 76-11, having found that the project will not have a significant adverse effect upon the physical environment. The Environ- mental Review Board' s recommendations to minimize the impact of accumulatiiie developments of this nature in this general vicinity are attached herewith in its transmittal. 5. 0 ADDITIONAL IiZI)RMATION: The Planning staff has had a number of meetings with the applicant subsequent to Hoard review and referral to the Commission. It should be noted that, although the plan ant: request still is for a 193-unit development, the plan has been revised to eliminate the 435 foot walking distance from parkinr7 to some units , to provide double the amount of open space, to provi.dom pxi%!ate open space for all units , to orient all units to open areas , to assign all covered parking , and to redesign both accecs entries to the project. The applicant was also to have had an additional traffic study taken in the area for review by the City.• 6. 0 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS : (Revised plan dated April 12 , 1976) Gross Acr►iage: 338 # 058 sq. ft. Net Acreage: 288 , 000 sq. ft. Units per nross acre: Permitted: 24 . 89 Proposed: 24 . 89 Total Units: 193 Floor Area and Type of Uni-�:: Type "A" 50 Single 505 sq. ft. /unit Type "B" 65 1 Br. 712 sq. ft./unit Type "A••F" 78 2 Br. 1010 - 1070 sq. ft./unit Open Space : Total Required : 45, 850 sq. ft. Total Proposed: 95 s9• it- Site Coverage : Permitted: 50% 9r2sn/ , Proposed : 40% ise Permit 76-1.2 Page 3 7 . 0 RECOMMENDATION: j in view of the above information, ar_d if the Planning Commission concurs with the request after finding that the project at the density as proposed is in compliance with the General Plan, that the complex Will sufficient access for its size and location and that the proposal not adversely affect the low- and medium-density residential property to the south and southwest, the Staff offers the following conditions of approval for your consideration: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1 . The conceptual plot plan and elevations received April 14 , 1976 shall be the approved layout. i 2 . Landscape and irrigation plan complying with Article979 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code and landscaping specifications on file in the Department of Public Works shall be submitted to the Department of Building and Community Development for approval prior to the issuance of building permitn . 3 . Soil and compaction reports shall be submitted by a certified soils engineer. Said reports shall be submitted to the Department of Building and Community Development and shall be subject to approval by that Department. 4 . Fire protection systems, including automatic sprinkler systems , standpipe systems, fire hydrants , fire alarm systems and any other required fire protection and detection devices or systems shall comply with the specifications of the Huntington Beach Fire Code. Plans for such systems and devices shall be submitted to the Fire Department and shall be subject to approval by the Departments of Fire and public Works. 5. The developer shall participate in the local drainage assessment r r district. 6 . The developer shall participate in the Orange County Sanitation District #3 Sewer Annex District. 7 . All applicable fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits . Use Permit 76--12 Page 4 8 . If the developer proposes to provide air conditioning, the insulation in ceilings and exterior walls shall be a minimum of R-19 and R--11 , respectively. If no air conditioning is to be provided, the insulation in ceilings and exterior walls shall be a minimum of R-13 and R-7 , respectively. 9• All building spoils, such to unusable lumber , wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an offsite facility equipped to handle them. 10. Natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at the loo- ation of clothes dryers , And natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities , water heaters, and central heating units . 11. The recommendation of the traffic consultant, limiting access on Wells Road to emergency vehicles only, should be incorporated into the project design. I 1.2 . All recommendations made on noise control by the applicarit' s noise consultant should be incorporated into the project. .design . JMC:gc •, I Minutes , H .B. Board of Zoning Adjustments March 17, 1976 Page 6 i USE PERMIT NO. 76-12 A22licant: James A. Carter To permit the construction of a 193-unit apartment complex pursuant to Section 9202 . 3 . 1 . 3 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code , loc- ated on the south side of the San Diego Freeway at the east end of San Angelo Drive in an R31 Medium-High Density Residential District. The Chairman informed the Board that Negative Declaration No. 76-11 was gran,.ed for this request by the Environmental Review Board on March 9 , 1976 . James Carter was present at t',r: meeting. Secretary Palin submitted a petition which has been received from nearby property owners in opposition to the project. I The Chairman opened the public hearing. Mr . Carter addressed the Board, explaining his project and expressing his willingness to work with adjacent residents and the City to effect a development which will not be adverse to surrounding areas. Gordon Kramer, representing the Huntington Villa Apartment Owners' Association, addressed the Board in opposition to the proposed pro- ject. Mr. Kramer cited the high density factor of the development and the impacts the increased number of units in the area would have on traf: 81.c flow on Starr. Street, with its increased traffic danger to children and added noise pollution of the neighborhood. Ile also based his objection on overcrowding, impact on schools , and possible increased criminal activity ill the area , and questioned the source of financing for the project. Others in the -audience added their support for Mr . Kramer ' s position . There being no other persons present to speak for or against the proposed project , the public hearing was c?used . Board discussion ensued . Secretary Palin reviewed the history of the subject site , and listed area: in which the proposed plan is not in compliance with the Ordinance Code . The densities proposed were discussed, as well as the projected traffic, counts as they relate Lo noivie and safety . it was the consensus of c.he Board that this request j should be continued for revision of the plans ; however, after dis- cussion of the procedure and time frame involved , the applicant requested that his project be referred directly to the Plannirg Comr,►ission for its consideration. ON NATION B7 PALZN AND SECOND BY LIPPS , USE PERMIT NO, 76-1.2 WAS R�_"C`ERnCD TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 20 , 1976 , AT THS RFQUEST OF THE APPL•I.CANT, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: t AYES: PALTN, C ROSBY, LI PP5 NOES : NONE. ADS'INT : NANI•. 87.A J- 17-76 Page 0 envmonmeITAL REVIEW em RD .�A. CITY OF HUNTIf TON KA CH•CAL .a,._•. fir. TO: Board of Zoninig Adjustments FROM: Environmental Review Board DATE: March 9, 1976 SUBJECT: Negative Declaration No. 76-11 (UP 76-12) APPLICANT: James A. Carter 2ROJECT: 193-unit apartment complex LOCATION: Subject property is located at the east end or San Angelo Drive. The Environmental Review Board, at its meeting of March 9, 197G, ranted the above negative declaration, having found that the proposed project will not have a significant adverse effect u2on the physical environment. No environmental impact report has been prepared for this project. Findings are based upon the information contained in the negative declaration request and supplementary information thereto, discus- sion by this Board, and the following recommendations: 1. If the developer proposes to provide air conditioning, the insulation in ceilings and exterior walls shall be a minimum of R-19 and R--111 respectively. If no air conditioning is to be provided, the ills3ulation in ceilings and exterior walls shall be a minimum of R-13 and R-i , respectively. 2 . All building spoils , such as unusable lumber , wire, pipe , and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an offsite facility equipped to handle them. 3 . Natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at the loc- ation of clothes dryers , and natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities , water heaters, and central heating units. 4 . The recommendation of the traffic consultant, limiting access on Wells Road to emergency vehicles only, should be incorporate.-d into the project design. All recommendations made on noise contral by the applicant' s noise consultant should be incorporated into the project: design. MOAM Me v A. ook5r # Acting acretary Environmental Review Board :df 3 doom r C2 -- f tom,• ._ 8�{ 3 -- C r f R3 •1 LLai STARIt AVE car= } R3 u R3 , Z j - ,ate• ��v E Aj"Iff Use Permit No, 76-12 r 1 f f I i II 40 •a 'f'O {-.-.---ems•{: A •ia •• ••aiiai{. ::s � .. so's `jo UBJECT .. �. • ITE see .� .. . . ......f........ • • . .tw.•osip0 . •• ♦ • a •. ••..{ .a.{..1 .. . ..• W3 •.�1 •1 ifii.it•.i1.�►1./!.• ..•ia.•..•..l . • • • ..• ff. Si •• !•f.ii... tlt..s. . ..{{• .{ {w.•s...• •..1 ..... .• ❖••t❖:.•!•.❖:. w•t ire liq Is .a,..•. I W CDMMERC I AL t PLANNING RESERVE MEDI.UM DENSITY USE DESIGNATION �• GENERAL P LAND NU y� KAM KM oar. • r s s 1 huntington b&t pkning dWartment Stof I; TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: May 4 , 1976 USE PERMIT NO. 76--12 (RE".FTF'RM BY BZA) APPLICANT: James A. Carter ZONE: R-3 121 Royal Oak Rd. Anaheim, Ca. LOCATION: South side of San Diego Freeway at east end of San Angelo Dr. REQUEST: To permit the construction of 193 unit apartment complex on a 7 . 76 acre parcel of land 1. 0 GENERAL INFORMATION: Use Permit No. 76-12 was originally before the Planning Commission at the April 20 meeting, however, as there had been additional information submitted by the applicant to the Planning Commission at, that meeting, the Planning Commission contin, ed action to allow sufficient time to review the inform, Lion. The Planning Commission also requested that the staff varify the ownership of the property and whether in fact the applicant was the property owner. Attached herewith is the option to purchase, which has been entered into between Spruce Grove Inc. and the State for the purchase of the property. It should also be noted that additional plins have been filed which are attached herewith for the Planning Ccmmission review. The Planning Commission requested that the staff notify all persons around the proposed project, and it ahould be noted that we have sent o-at a notice un the pending hearing to all persons signing the petition in oppusition as well as the surrounding property owners. Mr. Carter had submitted a plot plan giving information and his phone number for anyone to contact him requesting information on the proposed project. This plan was included with our legal CUP 76-12 Page Two notice sent out to all i�,rrounding property owners. The original staff report is attached herewith in which the staff has updated the information contained within the statistical analysis portion to now indicate the building types as well as floor area per unit. 2. 0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS: The developer had originally submitted a trafi'ic report to the Environmental Review Board at the time he was processi:g his request for a Negative Declaration. Subsequently, two addendums have been filed, one of which was disseminated to the Planning Commission at your April 20 meeting, however, as the traffic report as well as the addendums contain a complete picture on traffic counts in the area, the total package is attached herewith for your review. 3 . 0 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The Planning Commission at its meeting of April 20, 1976 by a unanimous vote of the Commission present recommended that a development moratorium be placed on the above referenced property. The Commission as a result of a review of this development proposal discussed the present zoning of R3 (Medium High Density Residential) and its relationship to surrounding developments and its conformance with the intent and purpose of the planning resex7e general plan designation. The land use designation was recommended by the Planning Commission and ultimately adopted by the City Council in July, 1975. The purpose. of the action was to allow the c Commission and planning staff to more thoroughly analyze all possible land use alternatives for the site. This additional review was determined to be desirable because of many develop- ment problems that can be attributed to the parcel, such as limited access, clone orientation to the San Diego Freeway with resultant high noise level potentials, and possible adverse impacts upon adjacent developments. • This matter has been placed on the May 3 Council Agenda. Therefore, the Planning Department will be prepared to discuss the City Council ' s action at your May 4 , 1976 Planning Commission meeting on your request for this suggeste moratorium. 4 . 0 AMENDED CONDITIONS% The Planning Commmission requested that the staff reanalyze the conditions of approval offerad for your consideration and in- corporate conditions similar to those which have been previously imposed for apartment developments along the San Diego Freeway. Following are tM amended conditions of approval : CUP 76-12 Page Three 1. The site plan and elevations received and dated 20, 1976 shall be the approved layout. 2. A landscaping and irrigation plan for the development shall be submitted to the Board of Zoning Adjustments for review and approval action. 3. Soils and compaction reports shall be submitted by a certified soils engineer. Said report shall be submitted to the Department of Building and Community Development and shell be subject to approval by that- department. 4 . Fire protection system including automatic sprinkler systems, standpipe systems, fire hydrants, fire alarm systems and any other required fire protection and detection devices or systems shall comply with specifications of the City of Huntington Beach. Plans for said systems and devices shall be submitted to the 4 fire Department and shall be subject to approval by the I Departments of Fire and Public Works. 5. The developer shall participate in the local drainage li assessment district' s requirements and fees. 6. The developer shall participate in the Orange County Sanitation District No. 3 Sewer Annexation. District. 7. All applicable fees shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. 8. If the developer proposes to provide air conditioning, the insulation in ceilings and exterior walls shall be a minimum of R-19 and R--11, respectively. If no air conditioning is provided, the insulation in ceilings and exterior walls shall be a minimum of R--13 and R-7 respectively. 9. All building spoils such as unusable ltunber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. 10. Natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at the location of clothes dryers. Natural gas shall be stubbed in the location of coo::ing facilities, water heater, and central heating units. 11. The design on the emergency access to provide for fire equip- ment shall be subject for review and approval action by the Fire Department of the City of Huntington Beach prior to construction in the field. 12. The termination treatment on Wells Street within the project shall be subject to the Department of Public Works approval. The wall at that location and the emergency gate apparatus shall be reviewed by the City for approval action prior to the iosuance of any building permits . r CUP 76--12 Page Four Landscaping to be provided within the area between curb line and the proposed masonry wall shall be the responsibility of the development for maintenance and installation. 13 . A six ft. high masonry block wall shall be constructed along the southerly property line of the proposed project. The design and material of that portion of the wall exposed to the front yard arep on Wells St. shall be subject to the Planning Department review and approval action. The intent of this condition is to insure that a decorative masonry wall is constructed where exposed to the street scene. 14 . A loop water main SYptem shall be constructed within the i.. • � d design criteria required b project subject to tncat __ . n i n i d p ] 7 '� 9 Y the Fire Departme?n:, and Department of Public Works. If this water main is dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach, it shall be located within a minimum of a 10 ft. wide easement. All structures proposed within the development shall set jack a minimum of 5 ft. from such easement. 15. The design treatment for the entry drive, landscaping, sign and wall construction shall be subject to the planning Department review f©r approval action . Such plan shall conform essentially to the conceptual plan submitted to the Planning Commission for review. 1 g 16 . The masonry wall proposed to be constructed along the north- easterly portion of the property shall be constructed in compliance with the plan submitted to the Planning_ Commission for review in conjunction with Use Permit No. 76-•12 received and dated April 20 , 1976 and shown on sheet No. 6 -;s being a 16 ft. high wall from finished grade by a cross section, typical garage floor plan as well as pertial front elevation. 17 . All residential structures .)n subject property, whether attached or detached shall be constructed in compliance with State acoustical standards set forth for all units that lie within the G0 CNEL contours ,for the property. 18 . The security entry apparatus proposed for the entry off of San Angelo Drive shall be submitted to the Fire Department for re-view and approval action prior to the issuance of building permits. 19. No structures other than those shown on the approved plot plan shall be constructed within the project. JWP:gc NL;-*I i:;;G i'%ll BEACH ,--pot ;.ttC TH9 ItN*Ri l(,NED RESIEWNIS DO W.RE BY OPPOSE THE. PUU.EE:CT +� �r ;.I'►'^ ",.)ER !!4 PtrRHIT NOf 76-12 PILED ON FEBRUARY 18, 1976 WETH P. 0. CZ4 1:1 pe Hcft�Ini�i�t� c:�! iN 6YACN, aj�awJA /O rf 7ACf: YK1:t; D NAME SIGNATURE ADDRESS S���A,/A"�/VAZIS rl ,.�`.�.�11� �J..�;►E1' .�a r4� I?t:e �.�3 ?,�. .�1111L2 IE•iJC . J ' , [' �?Y 7C rE.�trX I IJ u •�`A ��c-+.c; , ...a.._ 'Coe" `._.r r._.��' .,Lj�.v lr,�/ �� i[��[�r f%��,6�►L�''•LL�1..����.`►„�"`M' 7��LL. ''� tJ�jv. / e�fL'' ..c '1`.•i�".�/ !�+� �r '�"ri�j� �4ce�s✓'tJ"' !✓'1c-��- LI 'u'_LEa ��1�S�1.� •�' :1` � �c�tiq 'ram � D �l �� �/ �� J 4Z AA Jolkr, Ail r l '.1:...1..-' �. ,����.� ��r1l►i l-� � ��1 �l.t�lµ,� ��, 1' K�''t. YL �7'�'�Iti.V��...� "''�' ►'..1��. fir. s�".i..�lz�i.�° c `�'1�:�2.. 'CyL�.A"I 4 ac it �a►fr� �. _...�.�..r ...-....��... .ram ..�+....�.-..�....,,.� - -- - �......�.rr�.. / 1 f use Permit No. 76-12 - App+►+w1 �J considering an appeal to denial by the ' /C Planning Commisaion to pecan -ehe construction of .71 a 193-unit apartmnet complex pursuant to Section 9202.3.1.3 4,1 ' r of the Huntington Beach 07dinance Code. The subject •- �'� ' '"�' property in located on the nouns side of the San Diego Freeway at the east end of San Angela Drive in tho != c,•!. R3 (Medium High Density Residantial District) . A legal "� • description is on file in the Planningr Departmnet Office. ~ 4�. 7C r-. 174, �! 1 u•.. -�, � L till 7 �r I •, s 1 7 pr"—"YT 76- 1q7-771WA7 f d,� -773-1A cit .lames Carrter, lbtrietina A. Frankel�� ,1, udce `lacael pliae t 151 lauth Oxford A 8131 SAn Angela Drivo 4-12-75 Loa Anplee, 'Ca iuntington Preach, CA 92647 df 107-771-00 .� df iwaos A. Carter !Idolph P. Laixer' 121 royal Oak "ad 16133 t�lagr. Lana, Apt, A Anah6fat, California Ruiti►gtOn peach, CA 92647 107-22Q-59 of 107-771-09 at State of C41it 1'ransporta- Ldw.ia pgoodc an ev� 26072 Malags Lane Huntington 8"ch, C.A. $2647 107-22p-55 f df 107-771-10 df City Nesminstar Louie Aquilina ,_."l 200 otwinster Avenue 160fl2 ?talaga Lmnne V ..-.r"' I.Os 4 tor, CA 92683 Huntington beach, CA 92647 107- Q�56 df 107-773-02 df D a P Associates, Emil Y. Pasek David M. xelly 16121 Malaga Lune, Apt. A 363 S#n Miguel Drive, BTE. i~ P Nuwgta t french, CA g2b`60 Hu:�tingtan beach, CA 9x647 Y• 7�' 107-�11 58 df 107-773-03 cif If ttwtt�ton Villa Assoc. William F. Voorhes 555 South Plrnrex Street 16111 Malaga Lane, Apt. A y Suit?_2425 Huntington beach, CA 92647 Las Jtngelea, CA 90071 J 107-77 -01 df 107-773-•04 4f rwMald b. Doresak J. Richard Faster 16131 Mlaga Lane 16101-A Malaga bane ttut►cington Beach, Gi 92647 ttu.-itingL•on reach, CA 92647 107-y�1-�q2 df 107-773-05 df Card Kramer Stewart B. Van Dynn a � 1614 i Ms aga Mane A 151 tsillistsn Drive BuntA Beach, CA 92647 Hwitingt+on Beach, CA "649 1, Jt 107-771-03 df 107-773.O1 df Paul. V. Raliand N3.11i+Mart L. Aiakarde f h� 2869 Mendoza Dr. , Apo. c 8161}bait Anq*lo Dr. , Apt. A Zs -•osta lose, CA 92626 NuatbMton Nosteh CA 92647 . 7-771-04 df 1074 Avydond J. $Anders Dc tld 11. ' ftx 321 25135 1lCMrit�V� fin PSWv#y, CA 90241 rAqu*k N1.9iol, CA t2617 71-06 df �107-773-10 df r OKWO 2.a! s bane, Apt. A ttecfi CA 92447 .......... � yr.../iMM'.M--+.MY...• .4. •.. . .. �y 1 s.f..M.. • a w. w..-�,e-... • •a. • _ .. r. �r�, ..,r...r. ._ ,._. ._..,�.,- ItMlf'u`"OiYwr"!""""'�"" -•,...-_.. .. -.��it��l t Ilse F•amit NO. 2 7-S�4-At dt • hn T. ftherty Psge 2 16 211 T*rL "Offitsinstar, CA 92693 07-522-07 df 107-324-02 df Willi&& X. Dunn PhUpp. D. Warner err 16300 Jim Streak 10A41�.]denrerly Uti.ve WesM.ntinsteer, CA 92633 44"u"us **aah, CA 93646 107-523-01 df 107•-S 4-09 ttichard D. Green Donald J. makwoz t- 16281 Jim Street 10301:Twri Strcwt Wtatrnlnet+ot, CA 92383 wAstaAmater, CA 62603 I07-523-02 df 107-524-04 df jam An James. P. Bteinraets • 5112 P inceton Ave. 16311 'Tcri Strut Vestlinster, CA 92683 Westxti "ter, CAA 92683 107- -03 ; df 107-524-05 df Charles W. Scwrightp. John R. Wallnits 1 1610 in Street 26321 Teri street 11 West star, C1, 95683 WeatnLnstear, Ch 92683 5 gi 107 -•04 di' 107-524-06 df LA . Garland 1C 16311 Jim Street Rebecca H. Hockrnan Was ste►r, CA 92683 1b331 Teri Streat � Da Westminster, CA 92603 16 HU: 107 -05 df 107-524-•07 d; H.B Butterfield Richard E. Utting ,,,n' 14 163 Teri Streat 0311 Wells ftad • d Cat Weatminatiar, CA n/683 Westminster. CA 92683 161 Hun 107- -06 df 107• Carl . Moore 1631 Tori Street Pau) wend nate�r. CA 92683 286! f .01%, 107-523-07 df %7. Varna H. Wifngrove 16300 Teri 5twlet y y Westminster, Cn 92683 P. - 107-523-08 f d 'Peter 11. Mansur 1G250 Teri Drive Westminster, CA 92683 7 4M 1.07-•523-09 df Bruce Adams 7 16290 Teri Street Westminster, CA 92683 `". !" IR PUMT NO. 75-12 nupplwsatal lit+ting t, 4-22, 1070 10'J'-521-4s Pulip 1tsOtbard Co ix tnsy, Dan D t 1142 LOAX 02 X. C. Bl.nlcN* 833G dells Ad 11ant!jKtoa lfwwht Cal 92647 1142 Was 019 Kasha-nater, CA 92691 NuAtiprtton Beach, CA 92647 107-521-5s Jae 5"gan "mi" at Stauffer, Riallaw P i142 ZAYas i6 6142 Was f 15 8340 Hells lid LhIntingUm soh, CA 92647 buatingtom 1iaNt, CA 92647 Westminster, CA 92683 107 1 -29n David C. wag •rl bJ�� 8142 z.aPAX 45 As+si4est (W�,�►nasrnoli) ua ,� rnon L Jt Hunt ,�tpp Beach, Ch 92647 8142 LaPas 120 16 6..0 ody Cr ' UmtLogtoo sasch, CA 92647 H•t inster, CA 92683 r 1` 107-511-30� Rrs'.d�nt G1or�t �-naaaar Oa Joseph P n 9142 La Pas 44 16141 K; .ga Ln 16id Cady Cr Huntlr:yton Beach, CA 92f�47 ituntin9t.urs Slash, CA +iaa liter, CA 92683 lcl7��u�1-32a John Trilvar Ruth R. Kramr 1i.szDiirgnr, Bela 8142 WAS $17 16141 Malaga Ln M 1632D_Jody Cr Huntington Bwdch. Zh 926717 Huntington Beach, CA 1405t,&A�stu , CA 92683 J , lu7- 11-39a !Mario Silva Mr ` Kra. 61.0. Jackson Edward R jt 8142 Lapas 416 16141 Mrtlaga Ln 12 16351 Jody Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Haach, CA W(IstmLfistar, CA 92663 t ! lUi-51�'1-57a Gary Harlety Richard R. Dalissandro E'otts,. Cahrlos n. 0142 LAPar. #19 16141 E Malaga Lane 16360 I.Aoodruff St Huntington Beach, t:.'1 97647 Huntington Brach, CA 92647 ;rvntaiil�iatar, CAR 926U3 107-ail-58ts Rus.ident Ar i !tis Doresa►k •mill, Wildrail jt 0142 La Par 01 16152 Malaga U4 16350 St Huntington Deach, cA 92647 Huntington Botch, C:l 92647 Wontminater, CA 92663 107-501-300 Marjorie flarriu Tcni V. FwsA ItYU, Jamea L 9142 LaPat #12 JoUnt. H Pam 16330 Timothy Ln Huntington Peach, CA 92647 161.52 Kalaga 4D titastminstmr, CA 92683 «luntington asiach, CA 92647 ,-aek� M I& Pryne - Lambrose. T %f8tH-�i IPoks 16152 Malaga IH 16331 Ti T Rob-art R142 LAPat fl( Huntington Beach, C:t 92647 -• 1G331 nstutby Ln %mUngton Boauht ch 92647 Woatrninstttr, C11 92683 �� ................... 3]pptgg,JxiWI"1' W. 74-12 fo! Ga4.22w76tal i►Sct;Jnq f' Kr 6 Kra K. R. Willia" Jane MilligLn Fhilip Casa 0016152 Malaga Ln 1131 MW Af "10 15 16192 Malaga Ln #3 - ip ftat Odw, t, CA 92647 X=t beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 5h-tron R. Davis Len A1lraam Peter Chu �- 1CI52 malaga 1C 8131 San Angola i23 Grace Chu ` Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Hunt gexch, CA 92647 16192 NwAga Lh •D Huntington roach, CA 92447 r r f� Joh Hancock Alta C. CaWboll "7 0 Ban Angelo Dr John 0 Schlak Jr Jasi N. Cm*"Il ll t I d ngton Beach, CA 92647 0131 San Angal"025 16192 Malaga 14we !P Runtington beach, CA >F mt beach CA 92647 Jf 926477 Rtia ant J. faster 6131 San Angelo Lr 128 Wbart a G bson P%y R. Rater litngton Beach, CA 401 Atlanta 139 16101 Malaga '44,ze 1A 0 4 Huntington beach, CA 92647 Hunt Beach Ch 92647 LX �d R Garrison John Shoats Alice M. Talbott 8L San Angelo #26 8131 San Angalo 114 16101 gala%& Ln 1g stunt Beach, CA 92647 !hint Reach, CA 92447 Hunt Beath CA 92647 I to H Koehler Simon Parrott Ellen 9ecca J H Kohliler Jr 0131 San. Angelo 16101 Malaga Ln 1D Lill A:. 1 San Angela i8 Huntington Beal=h, CA 92647 Hunt Leach CA 92647 lfunt Roach, CA 02647 St , Maber Lynda L YDung Marian E. Arrickson 65 Edinger. Ave 16192 Malaga L's iA 16101 H�alage: Ln !C Au ington Beach, CA Blunt beach, CA 92647 Hunt Beach CA 92647 ' I Carolyn Miller Jim P. fttsybar Resident 8131 San Angelo or #19 16192 Malaga Ln V 16101 Malaga Ln QF Huntington Beach, CA hunt teach, CA 92647 Bunt Beach CA 926f7 92647 E.L. Hopkins Janice LaLrer Claudia Ice ._ington Robert L. Hopkinn A. P. Lbirer 8131 San AnG vlo 11 16192 Malaga Ln OB 16132 A I4m:.ag& Ln llutn Beach CA 55647 Huntington Busch, CA 92647 Hunt beach, CA Joyce Davidson sally Gale lionald Coleman 0131 San Angelo i4 Scott We 16132 B luntington Beach, CA 16192 Malaga Ln/ I Malaga Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, C% .._. -- .... .......... ............. ............... 14 USA YXNUS 160. 76-12 tv"I "tal LISUAq 4-22-76 Mars, Alger G. ax r Awwrt Darwriim Jill Coleman 14121 Ma14,16 Lea 91& 14072 Malaya Ln 6C 16132 A Malaga atatlagwri 704*'r Ch mantl agtoA Roach, CA uuntington Bench, CA 92647 Anna Las am 0 1 syynnne+s Pon" VGA" 16132 Malaga Ln #0 16121 Mtr$1e.9a Tin aC 16412 Malaga Las. #A lltuit Beach, CT. 92647 WAtington iksche U, $2647 Ktu Ungton Baaah, ' Michel* Xabonich Aesidont Mat* Maysft 1.5182 Malagh Ln !K 16121 Malaga Ln IS 26072 DW.ga Ln Is luntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington' bmwb, CZ 92647 ltt,atingm boadt, CA J. Yabanibh 1Ut KERB Fail 8 P*Rek 16132 Halaga Ln 6B 16121 Malaga Ln 1A luntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington "soh, CA 926471 tlelaan L Leirer Wdred Braver Allen Loirer 16121 QP Malaga 16132 Malaga Ln Huntington Beach, CA 52647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Darnell D. Kinslay Louis Aguilina Michelle D. Kinsley 16092 Malaga Lne 16132 Malaga OF Huntington Heaoh, CA 92647 ;luntington bench, CA 91647 Denyaa Houlders 6hamn Lewis /it.l 16132 Malaga Ln 6C 16002 Malaga Ln ID � Huntington Deach, CA 92647 Huntington Deach, CA Sttaxon DAlonnandro Susan Connor~ 161141 PAlaga Ln JE: 16082 Malaga Yet 1C Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Eeahe, CA Jackies Tourgeman Ernest Velazquez 16112 Malaga Ln. 6D 16082 Malaga Lri In Huntington Beach, CA Huntington Aeachr CA Htr 0 His, Frank lFelske Wriam berummemb 16121 Malaga Ln !D 16072 Malaga LA 10 Huntington poach, CA Huntington Seach, Ch l�A ,/[lJ1 L�+,� wca.c.s..l+.- ._...__ -oe..� 1 1 � ' J7-x11-66 df 321-13 df 1� usfi PI:SVU ' 76-1if t" vision of Righisays R. Shepard App. and Owner: btsta of California 2420 mils Stead Jaser Caxt ar rmt+o, CA $361! 4�i3�•7b• SACra 1fAst0sinrter, CA 02643 107-511-31 -va Irdf 107-Sil-59 df 107-521-15 d! Donald V. McVep John C. ArArus 7F1eadore Xoonigemark 8632 Derek ` 16340 Hood"fe 14331 "sodruff Street HuntirMtOn oaach, CA 92647 ftstydoatwo CA 92S#3 MieeboLasur, CA 92683 107-511-36 ;df 107-S1R-f0 At 1066521-16 of 0. Benefield f,� General Pacific C"P• Dertiel 0. 1.asaor c C 1as nuteJody Circle 9 12025 Garden Grove Blvd. 16341 fto�drnff Street �.[ t,►natminstar, CA 92683 Gard4m Girroe, CA 92643 llarts"Ater, CA 96663 205-511-30 f'� df 107-501-31 �, df 107-521-34 df nonald G. Parmer t ` 16321 Jody circle 'Dams K` Va`na Otto K. Ssboldt T.� 16321 Jodr_r,circle 4x683 16320 Timothy Lane 16370 Dana Circle westmevent ainrtar, C.l�' 6 Kestainates, CA 926 • �f ^'�,tit� �/;� 107-•511-�33 df � y �07 521-•06 of 1C7-s21�-35 dE FAUOto J. Huston Kayn- Q. Butleclgrr Lohd D. hasher 16320 Jody Circle 8350 Wells Road 1630 Liana Circle I �..: wastminater, CA 926l8 Had:minster, CA 91983 Westminster, Ct, 92643 z ln7-511-34 df ' 10?-!421-07 df 1,07-522•-01 df '.•'_ city of Westminster Ronald Erickson - 0 + city lull 0360 Wells toad Eccles U. t3e Mi118� weatinina&er, CA 92683 w2stminster, CA 92683 14698 31 Toro Lane Fountain Va7lley, Ch 04 107-511-ail df 1070521-08 df - 107-522 02 df -.. Michael A. Psrk Donald S. Wright Ralph Del Pants 8440 halls Ro;•tl 0370 Wells Road 1 Wells Road t/:��` Westminster, CA 92693 NEsmntinarter, CA 92683 842 Westminster, CA 92683 i�'44 107-51L-62 di 107-521-09 d! 107-522-03 df Fred Youngblood Carl C. Aa►rvey 9450 wells Road 8388 Wells Road Donald C. Smythe 1,.p r Westminster, CA 92604 ttaatrninrt;nr, C>. 92683 Westminster, Walls Road Westminster, CA 9 I s'/'� 107-511�-63 df 107�-521-�10 df 107-522-04 df -•�=�•4!e. Karon L. Neelands -lama . McX088on P460 wells Road Lawrence Pletcher Westminster, CA 96203 8390 e Road 8401 Hells Road , Keatminstnstbr, CA 92683 Westminster, CA 92663 107-511-64 df 107-521-11 df 107-527_OS di Juaaa V. Short it Stanley R. rencel $470 Wells Road e• 6400 wells Road George J. Kartines Westminster, CA 92683 Westminster, t".A 92603 16280 Jim Street �t'�� - IL -it- 07 Mestuinsta r, CA 92683 ,FiI 107-S11-65 df 1 -521-12 dt 107-522-06 df Joan M. Lovely Lloyd D. Harman 0480 wells )toad 9410 Wells Road Lloyd Baring r. '��`,..•1�•• Westminster, CA 92683 Wiratminstsr, CA 92683 16290 Jim Street Westminster, CA 92683 -- � Huntingtan Beach PfAnniOX cmNISsisq Mt' P.o. box do CALIFORNIA SUM T0: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM; Planning Conanission DATE: April 28, 1976 ATTN: David D. Rowlands, City Adiainistrator RE: Proposed moratorium on a "Planning Reserve" Parcel Adjacent to San Diego Freeway The Planning Commission at its meeting of April 20, 1976, by a unanimous vote: of the Commissioners present, recommended that a development mora- torium be plat-ad on the above referenced aiti (refer to attached area map) . This recommendation wau primarily the result of a development proposal which will permit construction of a 193 unit apartment complex. The proposed location in a parcel of land made availai le for develop- ment by the California Department of Transportation a a surplus parcel in the latter part of 1975. The Commission as the result of its review of this development proposal, discussed the present zoning of R3 (tdedium/high Density Residential) and its relationship to surrounding developments and its conformance with this intent and purpose of the "Planning Reserve" General Plnn designation. This land use designation was recommended by the Planning Commission and ultimately adopted by the City Council in July, 1975. Tho purpose of thiee action was to allow the Commission and Planning Staff to more thoroughly analyze all possible land use alternatives for the: site. This additional review was determined to be desirable because of the many development problems that can be attributed to the parcel, such as limited access, close orientation to the San Diego Freeway with resultant high noise level potentials, and possible adverse impact an the adjacent developments. The Planning Cocnlnission determined that these planning concerns were of such sufficient seriousness that additional land use analysis would be in the best planning interests of the: area. Therefore the Planning Commission P 9 . 9 recommendR that the attached ordinance which will place a three (3) month moratorium on the issu&nce of building permits be approved by the City Council. Respectfully submitted, chard A. Harlow, Secretary RAH:JMC:gc i Zr-=) EUtNGER III ---- - R3 • t tom. �! R3 t EC d! ' '' �•v > t- Lu f O STARK AVE R3 tQ � C2 �� PAZ OR. R3 1 ` 5 z p - . 1000 ♦ 00 SCALE BEET J I, IOil PROPOSED MORATORIUM AREA • Js !; HUNTIMCTON BEACH !Li NING DEFT. L •: 'i.• • a J •.: �.••.�:• O :GOO ml . .•• .• •r•• •i • � q+! f E E T •• • a� .�.' �.�.-0-1 r'� SCALE •• ......••• •••••, • Fk- UBJECT .. . .. .. . uj . . .. .... .. ..... •..• .. ....{I••i •w•• •..• .. .. ....... .. .. . ... ... .. . . .. .. . ... . ....... . ..... • •- - ------- - - ---- - •..•••.w• we v � W � C4 COMMERC I AL PLANNING RESERVE c :-:•: MEDIUM DENS ITY J. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DES I GNAT I U ,� ORDINANCE NO. , AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH IMPOSING A MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE OF BUI:LDTNG PERMITS BY THE DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING A14D COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ON CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY EAST OFF SAN ANGELO DRIVE AND SOUTH, OF THE SAN DIEGO FREEWAY WHEREAS , the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach desires to establish a moratorium on the issuance of building permits for that parcel of land east of San Angelo Drive and south of the San Diego Freeway and more specifically described herein ; said moratorium to be for a period of three months ; and The purpose of the moratorium is to allow the Planning; Department and the Planning Commission to study the compatibility of the present uses in the area , and to study and nropose 'zoning a110- rrdment s which would be compatible with the area and also con- sistent with the General Plan of the City ; and The Huntington Beach Ordinance: Code tinder Section 9051 and Government Ccde Section 65858 Permit the enactment; of an interim � a , err clin�.rr<.e �3.� an urgency measure to t�ri otect the public health , safety and vrelf'are ; and The City Council of the City of' Huntington Beach finds it necessary that this ordinance be adopted a:: an urgency measure to protect the public health , safety and welfare , 14014 , THEREFORE , pursuant to the provisions of' the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code , Section 9051 , and Section 65858 of the Government• Code of the State oi' California , the 01ty Council. of the City of Huntington (.teach does hereby ordaln as follows : SECTION 1 . The real property described hereinhelow is hereby declared to be in a moratorium area insofar as any new construct.1on or issuance of new buildinf; permits are concerned . SECTION 2 . The area when: t-hr moratorium its Imposed Is s pecif'iPa.11y described as f'ollows : s That nortion of the north half of the northwest quarter of Section 211 , Township 5 South, Range 11 West , in the Rancho Iaas Bolsas , City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange , State of California, as shown on a map recorded in Book 51 , Page 13 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County and more specif- ically described as follows : Beginning at the southeast corner of the north halt' of the northwest quarter, thence north 891129 ' 51" west 158 . 45 feet along the south line of the north half of said Section 24 , to the true point of beginning; thence continuing along said south line , north 89029151" west 478 . 13 feet : thence north 390 411152" west 558 . 50 feet ; thence north 47028 , 04" west 754 . 06 feet ; thence north 21015145" east 98 . 69 feet ; thence north 66015145" east 121 . 111 feet ; thence north 21015 ' 115" west 20 . 00 feet , to a point on the south right; of way line of the San Diego Freeway , as it now exists ; thence south 68044 , 15" east 1.12 . 09 feet- along said right of way line; thence south 51009104" east 755 . 39 feet along; said right of way line ; thence south 49,40108" east; 8112 . 35 feet; along said right of dray line , to the true point of beginning. , SECTION 3 . This is an urgericy ordinance necessary for the imarz-diate preservation of the public health , safety and welfare in order, tc► facilitate the orderly study and planning of said area, and to protect the public safety and welfare , and shall take effect upon adoption. This ordinance shall be of no further force and effec`, three months from the date of its adoption , unless extended by the City Council of the City of Huntington I3c,ac h . SECTION 4 . The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of t;hls or,d-tnance and shall cause same, to be published within fifteen days after the passage in the Huntington Beach News , a newspaper of g;tmoval circulation ,ion , printed and published in Huntington Brach Ca1J.fornia . PASSED A14 i ADOPTED by the City Council of the- City of Huntington Beach at- is regular meeting; thereof held on the arc+ clay of May , 1970 , ATTEST: Mayor _.�.."�..._ ,y c:;] e r It 2 . APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: AL qo lftt�yr dm n strator C ttorney APPROVED , TNLTXATING DEPARTMENT: i 3 • r . Ar No. STATE OF CA,L IFORH L1 } COURff OF ORANCE } s� CITY OF HUIrTfINGTON BEACH ) i r.' I ' j I, ALICM M. WEMVORTH, the d. Ay elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of tidntington Beach and ex-officio Clark of the City Council of the said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of member; of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach to seven; that the foregoing ordinance was read to said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of 19, and was again read to said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of , 19 , and was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council. i AYES: Councilmen: I 60ES: Councilmen: ABSKNT: Councilmen: City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beech, California t .7-mm, t• Car.ter 121 1by31 0* rt->.iri 11n3!1Li:-i r .,Q,j„92B07 April 30, 1976 •�, 1!/F 17- +ri Ibmt-a ile City Comcil City of 11untir r►tnn 11aach Hulatirlatm, ne3rti, Ca T Fir:;t beca» with this prv7perty er-arly in WCaTber 1973. >~raokim at this nar-et I Felt f:'vit it; is well lom i for. ,1n R-3 pmject because it is c ni opatihle wita surm-andlnrl Wildims, iL•ri Unse toc:-itinn to shoe and eatinel placks -in(3 riorA icm-ss to the f•re—,-wray for po Vle rxynirvl W rain l to vnrk. rii Wa—r xx J, 1975 T civarked wi.ti the Plaruunri llelsartment :u-a,,l t-ilkal t^ F,-.t-qin an.3 he told me t':Zt it wxs xnnerl l-? an 3 Ii11t: the surrounrii.m prgVrty .in flantlivttrnn Vkarie'i vici .al nn R--3. He (lid stzte to me at taut t.i m that tua felt th,ire wevi.ld ixa grartt o,-3,-Y)9ition fmr-r t�c33t-dnster.. Odler i t: L-m t:.-vit ,ia Felt thrit tJaaxm jpz�rty coull bn develrx a:: R-3. . After tti-� prrmertj went: t-.-) birl an•l vn warn swcressFul in rtettirx� the bid, we prom—irarl a �3mjlos7il to Aviv-1 np the prrxperty. Vb w,..nt to tan pre••• surinittal %essionn to make cxir c n-)jPw. crsl,ly with the city's reoeiircarrtents. On 17ebrx%r,r 10 /n s4nittol nar, pt)iosal to Uv%. nivir.=aint=►l. Review tbarrl, ,ancl it: p.1'vs.c.-I. Tmn it i&mt t i did Marra nfl Zoni.nq Piljustmants vhiere it still :ln:l :3om minnr orohls---m that: cn-ii,l 1:: r-a-vilved beat thare w-in, it:ill. oppmition Frrn the s,IrrrItulcli.m recsi,Pnts. 7t wis merit up to tho planniivl cmmission set aor. April 19, 1916. 9!iere was sea.: cnn Fusfm -w to Lho nr wear of plan-3 to ha s4ppl-iti 1, in i vA-- were twin short to su;aplyirIg emlgh for all. the crXrm- ' sinnr3r% N F'rid-r before t-17►e ThL'Ctinrr, acviitional p11ns wet, suapilacl. 'file ear ni ss i.omrs Ulm rLrDtest n i -% tend,, clelay for the !u3arfnrr .an,1 I agr-+col. At tMt tir.�.: they (lid rnt want t7 ha—Ar are/ fi a;.z partv.ntn-j to the c vie aril ariiii it; cnulI 1-P- iurltxl liter, on Ii-sy 4th. on Apr.i 1. 27t h z w-r a •,i vIn mw-ire of tJxa 17117t: t:1lat t:Jic Plannirl`7 COMnission later that niq',tt, aFt.w-r. I l-a4t •ntal uninimusly to rarest tlo City Council to en,-mtr a morat:ori,im on taus property. n ntlaven, I am 'u-..rc-: t:o can v,rhit I havr3 trios to 'io in trlY_i p1.9t, ,je,arl nrl rine pirt:linini to Im i"I the rprn-i,�it i!i. i1x;L of die jx nple secri to tra well. or--+-mizrYl tr► fi�l it- the nil cmtl.orts, )vit t!� Fict is T h-acra de.,jirrieI nwi or Uv3 tx�;t c-roraplaxes in 1) rntiwit rm Pe-ich `rrn the starrlixnint n`: ' 7 4r a 1. Scmriyt Matter. Orom i nli rm clap-irtwnt ;tgtinr chat it will. ba ona: nlF L,e nafest bi tie city) 3. qwn t,,x-ms (233%) 4. tie iwm-- -it lagst 45 Feat batwmi hiil.rlirrts ,:i. 7lx--- 4WAinrn nrrn tern star}, 6. 'An r."jilr.tn recr.•�ttinn canters The follryorinn cii7rt is to :31Y7,i diancies -.4a hvse merle to inprrrad tkm projoct frm. our. Fir.;t -PJ).mi%,rAon: rlaru�.i:zrt ll1t•'� Gro.ms 'Site 7.769 •-zc 333,: 30 sf lhtil .• Urx•ncble unit 3 24.39./ac 193 193 ^ht-n1 unit:3 193 192 IA-kc'xalor 20 50 One todro m 44 6.1 Zorn ty.-irmns 129 70 Onm. vnc - PJet site 233,309 283,309 Duil.clirn3 91,083 8914GO cnrl)nrts 32,400 25,920 Pali m-I :;:3,723 '13,650 •-3,073 rrnvirlal .59,903 106,390 ."6 t 687 233% pen sn7cn rmr.: th,m r.3r3tzi r '1 60,940 Park inrr %3LPiral 3.;'1 327 -27 Pxnvid�l Safi 32.7 -27 ].. I lz�v►� l rx;":err 1 t.r:. •r�l�z OF Wv-� ;jr.•nj^_c t by ci-y-- Million '1011ars 2. Rmoval :32 J. 1 27 ,)Zrl:i i'r7 ,j-11-11 4. Iccsmva"i nee Z z rtmat !I.nit I hart s,tirnittcY.i tra`Cirx rerxrrts slxxatinrT fiat the existing and -Orli"_ional tea"Fie to ran Annel-i W hl:tq'i will be less than j0% of, envixnmentAl capacity anal less tirm 10% o" wtu-il cri_sacity thrinn po-'rk hours of hie clay. far traF'`ic tvrdneors, Ct-rmli.n--PrinrTle & Ass-c- vnrn nelectel Crum n sirtrrcant:.-►-1 lint rliven rrc t;- tlx: lf.mtinot:nn Pzach TrIFFic T?nninears. ;9ii, in t'ur Last is•rrcel. to �levelnho nn t base stmets. Na are wilting to p-lar:e --m 3' high block drill on o-ir south pro arty line it Walls Tlnal. This wmild ass=3 the Yvdilents m f 1-k stmi nat•er teat ive. wrntl,l not rr-.ther them in -rn[ any. I rrltm *mot whir tJre Uirectn:- of Pablir, t irks, Pl u.rrt Uirectnr xyl 1[e-rd of rminmrinq of trc: City of Westr instar aril hwe c.ampl;.cr3 wi U` heir. c1-�s ices. qbe_ reTaestLvi th-i t: n 6' hirlh will be Wilt on Vie cifty 1"rrclar,, line vr,l t:v-, -;tseet le't.' Tn rennrls to tite patitinn s-ftiittal U1 ti:utt..ington Villa 11,-3tn. n mc.r. rsr�iaiat;irnms: .rit74:0 t:1it 1 ircrir sixplP_xes have an n-mrall ilen.sity aF l8 mits tier sere and tney retire t.h-tt oar (lensity Net lrymarei to 19 units per acre to mike it imil:-tr.. I wrxilcl l.ilza to reply by :untie•! that thsir Unites •r-2, in f-iat, :it 24+ units per acne -and th:3t is ill that we are .;nldm Fnr.. This inForm-ition cars reqrestaLl and room-stvad frai Jolui C.6:5e, ihu',tirvit on Duac:h Planninrr flapwt7r t. It might alnn i,e oC int.nrwit: ,*n crrtpare t'u: n.n0ii sytrx:, by tiro Vill--i Yori ri Tpt:3. Z.,-f o.nnt to all three story h rildinns -trial :r olemity of 10 units t-x:r. .-tcrc: ra.~ki terna rr}rl„ to cry- .rp with 31% open slsar:v. I Comarretil wi.t.:r our prni(-,-L all tan attire, 31% open :rxvtoz. 111-m rontals will ranria_ $715.00 f..)r tr) $350.00 Cor tv) Wr rmi. T feal t rat -tee vAll. ba nrYira ltnn the -troa mil in no way devaluo the srtrmim(Urnrl prni?rt•.y. i T.ft-.er rowl- -yinr1 all t.'V3 F,-Ic:t,3, 7 °oc1 t:i3 nay -is t.te Plannim I�e�lrt7nent, Planninn OomimAnn nivl City ChmaLl di. 1 �.fi ai die Z-)rYy,Lx:rty mn oricrin-illy xonkwl ;m1 tMon C-l.Tr:-u1n nrtific_i t!ur city Uvit it vvis r{nin,t to W, for sale ml t:7ey with the 11-3 wnni.nn -tt.3-1arent.ly bemuse t hit vminn rem-ti.nal. entlemn, in rronc l.us inn !ill, t-ri t I wish to rlo is pit the hirl}m t an:i Lent use on tho prn,xarry aryl maa n$- thn *aitrg thit; wet have mcra ,,%m. nss imlim-tten Mlrat: t:uarn t,: a cteryl ¢nr, trr,4 lansi.ty. �ir7rer.�lY .7'1'Tc A. CATMR I liv.,n n4mitta-1 trV"i.r:( rg)nrtt; shrxrinrt 1'vit the existin rATI a 111tiorml tr.3"Fic: '.ter din ltnnr.ln 'b 1 1•►1s173 will be, lag-3th'In 30t of envimrs.ntil cio-acity ajrl les, t`i-►n 10% o'= acts►il. r;n-»c;ty hrim pe-tk 11nur3 or t:i►o da�1. ( ur tra F Fic atv biacirn, lin-PrinrTle & Ass-x-!. ► nm selectr'.l -rxn 1 sc► r!o!►ta,1 lint nip►en rn t•:• the 1hnttnfrtnn rmch TraFFie lahrtinacrn. Iiis ., t}x. 1-►st to ► walop nn Uw3sa- streets. t-b are %Al.lire7 to nl-Arm ,in 3' :tirtz hlo&. ►till on n•ar sr»tth pmx'zrty lino at 1-bl1a fbil. '1ttls cnulrl wnmra t1w mallarits nF Waritr{nst ar drat 1*� w►- Arl not 1•,ntl-ir t::ient in vt f rr•►y. I avm rat wiUi Wn Directnr. of Pa►blic. t•k-,rks, rl•uuti.nq birectnr 3rrl [fca 1 raF Drineerirry of t've City of West"tinster .vxl havo . lir--i AW- tieir cl.3sire3. They mTaested th-it a 6' hilh will be built on t'sc cit.-1 1"imlar1 Litre -tn,l Evr atreat left Tii rcYjzr-I! to t;;zc 111rt=iti-M 3-1)-r it.Gal Ir1 ilatntimton Vill..i A,)tn. rx•rivir t�ssry:i.ztin•�3: Stnt:al that: tl-&-ir stxplexes 1mve an n-mr-ill bmity 1` IS .;►its lr_r. -icm and t:imy rmfaira that: hair 6ensity be lows- a•1 to P1 units :ter .-Acm G7 rvk3 it. .;imitir. t would l il:a to reply by atht:.tnn th=it th-,Ar iuiir_:; .jr.n, in F-ict, -►t 24+ ani.ts per acre -uul th.1t in -III t1rit ve ar 2 a,kinn 47or. This Womitim tx3 re iestol w] racclirs 1 fr(7r Jniui Cora, lbuitinibon Be.-►ch Pintrininn Depwbamt. it mirtht hlrn b. nr intnr(v,t. *fin rxn-,paltre the o�iia ::.yicci ;�r.wi•lci Ir- t:ho Ali 11 l Yorb-i i ptt.i. I1:,,,1 v.r.rlt. to all thm-a 3t!)rjr h d1dinr►s -vO '1 -wir;l l:.r i i uni.t,s :x:•- m.re. c:-r3 Fhle to cti'7•'tii ap with 31% cnen rsZ»,e.--a. C ---;vtral c�i.4:1 our project al.t tz•xa 3t0ry, 31% open qp icc. Tie rent ils wilI rinse: $215.00 Fnr b-imiclors to $350.00 rtnr tvxi 2xalrryx—. I Feel fiat: ►r! will_ I,n uprm- liriri tha area an,l in no w3;. cluv-slue tan surrvm(linr7 prnp-)rt.y. TFt 3r ravl.c•rtnrt all t'u3 .;".►ct,, 'r Cael ti;, name is Cia Pl.ir►ninrt f'"—p-w -king, Plannin,7 Cr rrni„inn -tnf1 Citi C vinci.l di i iA-P-.r t ,y3 1jmix,-rty Unn or. tni.ml.l y zr)AICd aivi vhon C-► 1'r..ins notiFic 1 t,!� city th-it. it w•is �nin-T th tx: r ir nal3 ruO tr'Zr_y c-m-lu -al with t~ho T -3 zot*T7 it.)n-trey;tly traciune Writ on biri rrrvi i.r►o i. r'oentlan.en, i?, ^nnrluyinn -ill. t:'W, T wish to do is put tlua 1► rilw--3t in 2 )A,-:it use na t!ic nr h)orty inI mm nt thn 1--%rrtn that we hive r,,Yv- irro•, inlicat au t:lnm.. .t•i i nr!rxl Fnr lass 1cnnity. in^er. lq 1� •-.. � ;;Ji�,,,,..r-,/ice'."""".. . IMc", A. CATZ rU.!i FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF USE PERMIT NO. 76-12 1. The proposed 193 unit apartment development is in conformance. with the applicable development standards of the R3 zoning on the subject property. 2. The design and layout of the project has mitigated the size, shape and orientation of the subject property as it relates to the adjacent freeway ;nd multiple residential units. 3. The access to the project and the traffic to be generated therefrom will not be detrimental to the health, welfare, and safety of those persons residing in adjacent development. Q . The project has been designed so as it significantly mitigate the noise emanating from the adjacent freeway traffic and the total security concept will help mitigate any resultant crime problems. I �I ACOUSTICAL SIGHT- LINE ANALYSIS I III . II -ttjwls cop r=WbH ' L i 1 1 i 700 D E NSTY GRAFT' d 1 T 4M" UU. O& ! R3 0. 0 0 a 4189 PER ^C 57� Soo 483 442 1 7 la I.WrT R s PW AC 400 38 38 T PLM 1lor • 193 VjoffS 1 354 345�_ ./�3Q �TEv_�,�T�o �.r►u �_�,_� t 327 '�.' 322 t 300 rr �. '���� �Y •T�• �,� tr � 1?3 ltl�itT?r 2 7 0 _ r °2 f 200 193 ..� . rt iswit '? a.1S '• ` t VOR i t 0 L49 `� ft 2•BR Z t ! Z.30 �� �� ,• v'AL41E t SEP rOft QRAFT 1 a A \ `�` �� TAKEN FROM µ.me. 0 £ MM3 PAAKIM4 err -oms CHILDREN TMAL POPULATION DEUSTY GRAFT coo s 17 PIUSSI LE UPJCW or R3 24.89 irR ^C 579 Soo 483 4 4 2 !o l5tl" Lwo" �400 41 7 is a wrs PS* arc PLAN 3&r SiIMITTIa E? 38 3 a i _..._.�. 354 093 Uri" '34 'S��, / 50 RFYl; i .327 322 300 •�r - t FINAL !PLAN! ADULT dWLY � 270 40 /4 1Q4` 200 193 r s t l 0 1.l5 -• �� � � !•DR ? ! O t 49 � 1 2.30 138 '� t t VALUE' W W PIM t rRAO T: 1 o O '� �ti` :t TAKEN F'lEt9M N.B. t ` 7 r J pt i 6 fry i UNITS �y�I}�G+Ot+iS iNILDREN TOTAL PO LAT)400 hunti ton pksMinq departrn t ff ��ie UrL. TO: . PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: May 4 , 1976 USE PERMIT NO. 76-12 (FRFFERED BY BZA) APPLICANT: James A. ^arter ZONE: R-3 121 Royal Oak Rd. Anaheim, Ca. LOCATION: South side of San Diego Freeway at east end of San Angelo Dr. I REQUEST: To permit the construction of 193 unit apartment complex on a 7 . 76 acre parcel of land 1. 0 GENERAL INFORMATION: Use Permit No. 76-3.2 was originally before the Planning Commission at the April 20 meeting, however, as there had been additional information submitted by the applicant to the Planning Commission at, that meeting, the Planning Commission continued action to allow sufficient time to review the information. The Planning Commission also requested that the staff varify tthe ovmership of the property and whether in fact the a licant was. the property owner. i Attached herewith is the option to purchase, which has been entered into between Spruce Grove Inc. and the State for the purchase of the property. It should also be noted that additional plans have been filed which are attached herewith for the Planning Commission review. The Planning Commission requested that the staff notify all persons around the proposed project, and it should be noted that we nave sent our a notice on the pending hearing to all persons signing the petition in opposition as well as the surrounding property owners. Mr. Carter had submitted a plot plan giving information and his phone number for anyone to contact him requesting information on the proposed project. This plan was included with our legal ASU i. 4r�;t CUP 7 5-�12 Page Two notice sent out to all surrounding property owners. The original staff report is attached herewith_ in which the staff has updated- the information contained +within the " titisti,c:al analys,i!3_portion to_ now .indicate the building types as-well as flog area .per unit, 2 . 0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS: The developer had originally submitted a traffic report to the Environmental Review Board at the time he was procQssing his - request for a Negative Declaration. Subsequently, two addendums have been filed, one of which was disseminated to the Planning Commission at your April 20 meetinq, however, as the traffic report as well as ti.e addendums contain a complete picture on traffic counts in the area, the total package is attached herewith for your review. 3. 0 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The Planning Commission at its meeting of April 20, 1975 by a unanimous vote of the Commission present recommender' that a development moratorium be placed on the above referenced property. The Commission as a result of a review of this development proposal discussed the present zoning of R3 (Medium High Density Residential) and its relationship to surrounding developments and its conformance with the intent and purpose of the Manning reserve general plan designation. The land use designation was recommended by the Planning Commission and ultimately adopted by the City Council in July, 1975. The purpose of the action was to allow the Commission and planning staff to more thoroughly analyze all possible land use alternatives for the site. This additional review was determined to be desirable because of many develop- ment problems that can be attributed to the parcel, such as limited access, close orientation to the San Diego rreeway with resultant high noise level potentials, and possible adverse impacts upon adjacent developments . This matter has been placed on the May 3 Council Agenda. Therefore, the Planning Department Couiicil ' s action at your_Ma 4 , l976 Planning Commission meet hg -on your request for this suggested moratorium. 4 . 0 AMENDED CONDITIONS: The Planning Commission requested that the staff reanalyze the conditions of approval offered for your consideration and in- corporate conditions similar to those which have been previously imposed for apartment developments along the San Diego Freeway. Following are the amended conditions of approval ; CUP ?6-12 Page Three 1. The . site. plan and elevations received and dated April 20 , 1976 shall be the approved layout. 2. A landscaping and irrigation plan for the development shall be submitted t-- the Board of Zoning Adjustments for review and approval action. 3. Soils and compactit:,n reports shall be submitted by a certified soils engineer. Said report shall be submitted to the Department of Building and Community Development and shall be subject to approval by that department. 4 . Fire protection system including automatic sprinkler systems, standpipe systems, fire hydrants, fare alarm systems and any cther required fire protection and detection devices or systems shall comply with specifications of the City of Huntington Beach. Plans for said systems and devices shall be submitted to the Fire Department and shall be subject to approval by the Departments of Fire and Public Works. S. The developer shall participate in the :local drainage assessment district' s requirements and fees 6. The developer shall participate in the Orange County Sanitation District No. 3 Sewer Annexation District. 7. All applicable fees shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. 8. If the developer proposes to provide etir conditioning, the insulation in ceilings and exterior wells shall be a minimum of R-19 and R-11 , respectively. If no air conditioning is provided, the insulation in ceilings and exterior walls shall be a minimum of R-13 and R-7 respectively. 9. All building spoils such as unusable lumber, tire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. 10. Natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at the location of clothes dryers. Natural gas shall be stubbed in the location of cooking facilities, water heater, and central heating units. 11. The design on the emergency access to provide for fire equip- ment shall be subject_ for review analapproval action by the Fire Department of the City of yHuntington�8e�c`Ii pra:or"to w_ _ .__. construction -in-the ., field:" -� 12. The termination treatment on Wells Street within the project shall be subject to the Department of Public Works approval. The wall at that location and the emergency gate apparatus shall be reviewed by the City for approval action prior to the issuance of any building permits. 4 CUP 76-12 • Page Four LanCtscapxpg., to be Provided within the area betwe en. _curb_Tine. and ._the_proposed masonry wall shall be the responsibility,,of. i:he development for maintenance and installation. 13 . A six ft. high masonry b7.Eck wall shall be constructed. along the southerly property line of the proposed project. The design and material of that portion of 'the wall exposed to the front yard area 'on Wells St. shall be subj+ct to the Planning Department review and approval action. The intent of this condition is to insure that a decorative masonry wall is constructed where exposed to the street scene. 140 _A , loop water main sys'cem shall be constructed within the project subject to -focatl6n and design required by the Fire Department and Department of Public hlorks. If this water main is dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach, it shall be located within a minimum of a 10 .Et. wide easement. All structures proposed within the development shall set back u minimum of 5 ft. from such easement. 15. The design treatment for the entry drive, landscaping, sign and mall construction shall be subject to the Planning Department review foi approval e.ction. Such plan shall conform essentially to the conceptual plan submitted to the Planning Conir,ission for review. 3.6 . The masonr wall proposed to be constructed al,a masonry . wall. p p ,g the north-- easterly portion of the property shall be constructed incompliance with the plan submitted to the Punning Commission for review in conjunction with Use Permit No. 76-12 received and dated April 20, 1976 and shown on sheet No. 6 as being a 16 ft. high wall from finished grade by a cross section, typical garage floor plan as well as partial front elevation. 17. h11 residential structures on subject property, whether attached or detached shall be constructed in compliance with State acoustical standards set forth for all units that lie within the 60 CaEL contours for the property. 18. The security entry apparatus proposed for the entry off of San Angelo Drive shall be submitted to the Fire Department for review and approval action prior to the issuance of building permits. 19. No structures other than those shown on the approved plot plan shall be constructed within the project. JWP:gc INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION i H-MV4GUN WK0 To . Floyd G. Belsito Frog Edward D. Selic City : &tinititrator Planning Direct( Subject REQUEST TO REVOKE Date Februar; ..977 USL PERMIT NO. 76--12 At. the January 17, 1917 City Council meeting, Mr. Thomas Ulmer, represent- ifg. the Westmont Homeowners Association, presented a request to the City Council that Use Permit No. 76-12 be considered fcr revocation as provided in Section 9816 of the City ' s Zoning Code. This code provision provides for City, Council revocation of a Use Permit if it has not been used within six months of the date it was gz,nted. A question was raised as to whether the time this project was under a restraining order from the Courts would extend the six month period by that amount of time. Discussion with the City Attorney' s office has led to the conclusion that the restraining order has no legal effect on the six months as provided in the Code. T)ius, since the application was approved by the City Council on June 7 , 1976 , the six months date was December 7, 1976 . The applicant applied for building permits on August 24 , 1976 , and on January 5, 1977 , the Building Department certified that the plans had been approved. No building permits have been issued and no construction begun. Since the Code does not define undue delay, it appears that Council act-ion . on this matter is discretionary as to whether the applicant has proceeded in undue delay in his endeavors to move ahead with the project. Another factor that could be taken into consideration is whether conditions have changed on properties in the vicinity in such a way that this use may now not be appropriate. However, there havr. been no significant land use or building changes in this vicinity since the project was approved. From the information presented in this report, iL appears that the applicant has tried to move ahead with this project and fulfill City requirements and the delays encountered have been the result of Court actions on this project, The approval for this project is valid for one year and expires June 61 1977 unless an extension is requested a►i.i granted in compliance with the City Zrning Ordinance. EDS:gc • IQw✓ T. cartar 121 ml-t1 rnk rez••x1 Anal-aln, of 92007 April 34, 1976 i 11n mrable City Crxsncil city Or 11tmt:ijrtrn Dmich ha-,3610, CIA rtY • r 1973. nq � c�-1r.t• in Aep•'r� I + ir3t becam in'mt J31 w�.t.� f~`1in ntrn rty t at t'.�is vet I ''elt t'.�.-it it is -,sell l.ocatn�i fnr. .zn R-3 Nmiect beca�sc: , '►tilile crit:i 31rrry•.a�nrli.•icl 1�1111dia>rls, itq c1ma Inc-Itimt to nhigpi.n►rt i.t i. � .. �nr 1Q rx�rtirrl am) ,VA anting Pi awl wl vo rn-t>r a-Mss to the fre�eny t�'�P gnittl to wnrk. on Daaa*ber, 9, 197:i T ci xacl;a►1 wi t1 the PI vt-nim IX-1sar'trwant •vt3 t t� .gerrXio arri i1e tnlcl -w t.:1c.�it ;tinsa��nat�-'j.3 rt�el�lic1ay41ta to �'�tit at A�aexty to 11'antirrrtnn 1'�e1�`t .� r . t.e�--13.nster.. �z:I�er. Lira tl~nt :te Fc1.t there 4mil-1 be ire.!•t o,?:xogi_irxl ran t1><•ua t xrlt ;is felt :1l71 t t1 m �.3ro er ty as R-3. After t:� �)t�'ty want t o bi(I anal «:± 4J�r�' s��-or�'��«t in �LL-titr, tl�e bid, we pramaral a prrivagzl to :leirclnp tlia pm.-Oartj.. t•te umt to two pre- submitt-ll rMISiorts to make our. �sl.�: arr.q)'-i with the city'� re��rmic'.��ts. to Mbv iar� 1Q wn slimittcA o:w z�M)33 t'. t� tiv= T3tvirnrzrtanta]. fltvi.ew 13r�=1>"l, I Lnnts ner i t x1t %)all : .. , T ar1 it Ira;,r1. o still XV1 ,vm rltnmr c a-lltl h: b:1t tliare w-in- atilt oppo-dtion frm tixa s,irrmimlinRr ragi,.If nt3. It wns m1t tip to tho plvtnilvr �ni3sinn not `_nr. April 19, 1916. 'Piere w:is s-�na onnFusS:yn -is to t' rnrix3r or' plans hn be s�1APli�'•l• -m l ale .era +:wa short in dying ennw'ri1 For all. tlr os: F cmm-d isir i. On riti before tine rwatirrt, -vv litinnat plans were suppticrl. :1tie c1'Y!Tnis5innf-'r3 tiu3.n wT1a-gCe1 a taa (Ielay for the aarinR an-1 I agreal. A.t that: tim they did no": wnnt t:') lvaar. aryl `z ` its partain rY{ to t`x. ci��e and :3nicl ir. crn11�1 lr lxrirrl lntar. , on 'iry -1t!1. On April 27th 7 wa3 -1•1110 m.-ma of tha f-t--t that the P1.'vlTi" tYirnnisSion later that night, a`t I tuft �mtr:l unnnimlisly to rarest t'he City Council to enact a mar.atnri•.n on t lds property. rentl.armn, I run :tern t..o r'.n want I halm tried to In in the 131at, Pled nrl cam porntntno to `Yv.l n-"I the [fist of W)a swm Co be aletl. ornvtixa� to fi'7 � ,�I�es~i,tolt mtinrtt ,tteacl: fIYAt ro ttie-is _ h3vr n:»tianil nnc n fey) be crfj. £3tmyt ri.nt OF: 1. samriyt flatc ar. �mm ��nlioo dery rt:mni. gt;%tirrf tk'rt it will. k nna nl� 1-to na f-est Li Irk (Aty) 2. Pri'»cr 3. nJ,= P;pnces (.233�} 4. tie lmm it lo-vit 45 Fee!: Wt ruan h iiJ.rl mR 5. 'lln b-Al'Iinf" am. t:►.•:I stoxy 6. 2A•m c:.n.,jlmtra recrntion r mtc3rs The {ollrvirr. civir.t in to shrxr cNuvvTes �4c `:-'nn mvlia ti imprrm the projact free mr ll imt !:.1►.rdsni.nn t Planni:YT Mt1 clra site 7.769 »c 3330590 sF 2t)tZl. allrxrraule units 24.89,/Ac 193 193 ".gat d units 193 19? P. :;Selar 20 50 One I~elrrrr+ 44 51 Wn &,:,,lrnrm, 129 78 , Cart-te ( flat site': 21113o309 2a3,3Q9 adlding3 911,085 99,4G0 Ciqmr.t3 32,400 25,920 � Soa2as Pi--m-ptirv-1 530723 .1a0 650 -8,073 Prnvi:ia:t :i9,903 106,590 +46,687 233% c�r_n sn-ica rmre kh•in rN.ptir--1 60,940 plus f w tb9(piral 331 327 '-27 PrividL1 3A 327 r►27 1. I 1�7v1: l.n+►?aMl t.te n, Ily? nF Ui3 -x+ iwt by nr-u-- million il-Alars 2. :kmvatl 32 barlm-nn. 3. rtv cw--1 27 ytrkim w nn 4. Panwal nne *�xv:tmit ttnit 1 . r (got't30 r:IVIC CENTER WOO MS'TMINSTER AVENUE 11W7MTON KACH WESTMINSTER;CALIFORNIA 92M p«:HO DVARTMENT 714 C&F. M-MI1 March 3, 1976 4 1n7r. tM+�MI %aCA. C- .Environmental Review Board City of Huntington Beach P., d. . Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 ATTENTION: Mr. Melvir, A. Tooker Subject: MD-76-11 Acting 5enretary UP 7612 Gentlemen: . The City of Westminster has reviewed the Preliminary Environmental iAr+pact Document submitted for the construction of 193 apartment units to be located immediately south of the San Diego Freeway, north of dells Road. It is our opinion that the construction of a high density residential project adjacent to existing low density residential developmen t in the City of Westminster would be detrimental for the following reasons: • 1 . The Traffic Report submitted indicates approximately 5 to 10 percent of the total project would utilize Wells Road as prill>airy access. It is our opinion that approximately 40 to 50 percent would utilize Wells Road as their primary access. We do not believe the social , noise, and safety impact created by the additional 600 to 700 vehicles per day through Wells R.,ad has been thoroughly addressed. I 2. The Traffic Report also indicates that streets located within Huntington Beach are capable of handling additional traffic generated by the proposed project. The City of Westminster opposes vehicular access between the proposed project and the existing low density residential development, due to the increased traffic levels it would generate in a residential neighborhood on streets not designed as collector streets for through traffic. We would not oppose access for emergency vehicles only. Very truly yours, f,.• • r _.... . d 4 U& Ir Robert J. Hu tl ey City A i strator RJH:vh . • ,;" POLICE PE AR''TENT Aftk �. , ,•.- City "of Hunfingto Be, ch ..Olt P.O.ecx To 1WW MMW"Az",M.UNTtMGToN 5L%C 1.cn;s3"9 Ti����s���s3e►�si� IMU ROSIiAiLLI Cj*f of folic* April 30, 1976 To WHOM 2T MAY CONCERN: On April 29 I was contracted by Kr. James Carter who indicated that he desired to build some apartment buildings at the east end of San Angelo Drive. Mr. Carter presented a Plot plan for this group of apartments and stated his intention to provide excellent security for the area. Security precautions would includq a limited access gate at the north end of the apartment complex, '_tmiting access to residents only. There would be a telephone at that location for the use of visitors in contacting residents. Five closed-circuit television cameras would be located in the garage area, focusing on the apart- ment parking lot. All doors would be equipped with deadbolt locks, and all windows would be those leaving additional locking mechanis:W. Mr. Carter asked the undersigned his opinion of the proposed security plan and was advised that it was excellent and offered the apartment complex very good security. . , i L'L • • M. Relic ,'Police and Public Affairs KRz . Address aN tommmvicotions to for Cbirf of Polict -- VAN HOUTEN a IA7 S f as ia► MANDW Atli ca►LWIDruru tea: JOHN J. VAN HottTIM. ft February 18, 1976 Rsport No. 360-76 SPRUCE GROVE INC. 121. Royal Oak Rd. Anaheim, California 92807 Attention: Jim A. Carter Subject: Noise Insulation and Control, Project Site Adjacent to The Sat: Diego ?reeway, Huntington Beach, California Gentlemen: Drawings of the subject apartment coe:plex have been rsviewed to determine compliance of the project with the State of California Noise Insulation Standards. The following assessment and recoamndations, are provided as a result of this review: External Noise Noise matasurements were obtained on the site at a position corresponding to the nearest residential location to the freeway. 'Plyt average noise level Was found to be about 67 dB(A).* A representative graphic recording of the noise is included as Sheet 1 of this report. The apartment site is located at a distance from the San Diego Freeway, such that the Comunity Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL)** is between 70 to 80 dB. CHEL estimates are based on the following traffic conditions: San Diego Freeway 1973 1985 � w..wi•�r.r...r.rww �+rw� .err Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 123,000 1400000 Traffic Speed 50 to 60 mph SO to 60 mph Heavy 'truck/Auto Mix 6% 6% Two Axle 'trucks/Auto Mix 6% 6% {Refer to Appendix I, for an explanation of tithe A-weighted measure of noise. Refer to Appendix it, for an explanation of the CHEL measure of noise exposure. r Jhn A. Cartar February 18t 1976 Noise Insulation antral Page Two Exterior Noise Control The exterior noise exposure levels are cons5dered excessive and oust be nit- igated. It is rec- ssended that a continuous noise barrier wall be constructed along the boundary of the project borde-ing the freavey. The height of this Wall, should be at least IS feet. It may be fornad as tho rear wall of the carports and be constructed by use of wood stud and stucco or can-Mate blocks, which are well sealed. The noise barrier, as recamended above, and building layout, as indicated on the Tract Nap, will reduce the freeway noist when experienced at locations on the site by from 10 to 15 dB. Noise levels at most exterior living spO+ces - will be in the range from about 60 to 65 OW, With the noise barrier and building layout as recommended and indicated on the Tract Nap. Interior Noise Control Recommendations The following recommendations are provided in order tc insure a design which complies with the State Noise Insulation Standards: 1. Forced Air Ventilation is required in all apartment units. The interior CNEL of 45 dB, as required by the State Standard, is to be mat with all windows closed. Forced air ventilation should be provided, Which complies with the Uniform Building Code, Section 1305. 2. Second Floor Windows in Units Directly Facing the Freeway, should have a Sound Transmission Class (STC) of at least 40 dB. (Windows in buildings nearest the freeway only) 3. Second Floor Windows with Line-Of-Sight to ,the, Freeway, should have a STC of at least 34 dB. 4. All Windows (other than those specified above) should be tightly fitted and weather stripped to provide a Traffic Noise Reduction of at least �2 dB (STC rating of no less than 25). 5. Attic .-Vents should be placed on the sides of the apartment buildings which are not directly facing the freeway. 6. Roof Sheathing should be at least �" plywood, well fitted to form an acoustically sealed diaphram. R-19 Insulation, should be placed in the attic space. I. j. VAN HOU"TEN & ASSOCIA'lTS r Jim %,: ,cartes lebruary Le, 1976 Noise Insulation a outrol Page 'three y. Second floor Entry Doors with line-of-sight to the freeway, should bye thick, solid core, well fitted, and we&ther-stripped to provide at least an M hating of 30. p&jjX Wall and floo9coWn slizration Rjtpill and S ci icationj L. ra rtX Wall should be- detailed, as follows, to provide at least a Sound Transoission Class (SW) of 50 dDt a. 2" x "' wood studs on 2" x V plate, b. two layers of V (or 5/811) Gypsum well board on one side of the studs* and 5/8" Gypsum wall board on resilient chaeaele on the other side, c. one layer R-11 insulation between the studs. 2. r10 Ceili_nA SaQarations should be detailed as follows to provide at least an STC of 50 dB: a. standard carpet and pad, thick cellular concrete, c. 5/9" plywood subflour, i d. R-11 Insulation between the floor joists s. " Gypsum Board nailed to the underside of the joists. 3. Uncareeted_ Floors in bathrooms, and/or kitchens, should be covered with a resilient flooring material to provide an Impact Insulation Class (I1C) of at least 50 dD, as required by the State Noise Insul- ation Standards. k. plumbing in party Walls_, should be avoided. However, if requiredy all waste and water supply piping should be isolated from the stude, plates and drywall, with no less than i" of approved sealer or by use of isolation pipe clamps and pipe insulators, as manufactured by Specialty Products Company, Stanton, California, or the equivalent. * Any combination of � " or 5/8" thick well board, may be used to achieve tho two layers required. J. J. VAN HOUTEN & ASSOCiAT'ES r Jim A; Carter iebruary 18, 1976 HotZe Insulation an ntrol Page Dour 5. Sound Control SReci fications„,. as provided in Appendix III, should be included in the project design. Certification of Comeli,4po It is hereby certified that the dRsign of the Apartment Units, adjacent to the San Diego Freew4yj as assessed and recommended harsia, cmpliia with the State Noise Insulation Staadards (CAL ArM CODR: Title 250 Chapter 1, Sub- chapter 1, Article 49 Sec. 1092). Very Truly Yours, ©� to J.J. VAN NO EN d SOC TE ?hn J. Va outen, P.B. {m onsulti ngincer in Ac �, HA1i�VH/c rgjFC� CA�1���� Enclosures i j. J. VAN HOU1 EN h A&SOCIAM r�- i 70 11w 63 id 60 40 I I00 90 TINK: 3:38 TO 3:50 DA'['E: 2-17-76 so Paper Speed: .3 misec 70 PROJEMA.Partment Site S/D Freeway 60 LOCATION: 70' south-vast of Free�ray M SO A-LEVEL: Lgo6S ` L5..6� 7_ LIB-12 0 ec 40 30 20 I i A-Level Variation 10 a 40 So io •o --- Sheet I APPZNDIx I ' A-WEIGW..D SOUND LEVEL, A-LEVLI. The scale of measurement which is most useful in community noise measurecrant is the A-weighted hound pressure leval, coamnoaly called A-level or dB(A). To establish the A-Tavel, the acoustic signal is detected by the Microphone and then :altered, heavily weighting these portions of the Noise which are most annoyin; to individuals. The root-maan-&quart (ras) value of this weighted signal is than read, utilising a conventioa,al sound level meter. It is interesting to note t;t the A-weighted filter characteristic, shoita below, actually amplifies the signal at frequencies between 1000 and 5000 Hs. At frequencies substantially above and below this range, it sevrrly resacts the acoustic signal. This waighting of sound eaargy corresponds approximately to the relative Annoyance produced by noise at various frequencies. The A•-weighted sound pressure levels of a few typical sources of noise are listad on the next page. I i 10 0 ` j W a a w oc 2 0 r............... .�. W I— j r U. -30 -4 0 20 50 100 200 $00 1000 2000 5000 10000 20000 FREQUENCY r hfs A»WE MED FILTER C;3.`XACTERI5TIC f The A-level of traffic noise and other long tern noise producing activities within and around a community, varies considerably with time. Measuresients of this varying noise level, are accompliahed by recording values of the A-loyal duv Lng representative periods within a specified portion of the of the day. The three valuee recorded arcs . L90' - the near minimum A-level, Which occurs during the ace-aiaute period. WE' of the tine the A-level ie greater than this value. . . L50 the central tendency of A-ieval. This value is exceeded 50% of the time during the one-minute measurement interval. L10 - the near maxim= A-leveled s exceeded 10% of the time during the one-minute interval. Depending on the degree of A-level variation readin l of these three measures !? Q e 8 � g . are recorded for periods of from 12 to 60 minutes, to provide representative samples of the noise during the time period being examined (ie. • caarning, afternoon, night). The average value of these samples, or* then considered representative of the A-level during th,it ptiticvlar time period. SOURCE OF NOISE 3A* Normal speech at 3 feet 65 ± 3 Drill Presn 70 ± 3 Electric Typewriter 76 4- 3 Diesel truck (50 MPH) 84 + 6 Portable Wood saw** 102 + 4 * i Relative to .0002 dynes/cm 2 � iht At operators ear level * At a position 50 Meet from the roadway x•x er- APrMIX II WISE ZVOSUXE - COMAJ M NOISE tWIVALENT L: vil..(CNE-L) It is recognised that a given level of noise may be gore or less tolerable, depending on the duration of *xposuva experienced by an individual. There are uumrous measures of zoisek a posure which consider not only the A-level variation of noise, but, also include the duration of the disturbance. The State Aepartmont of Aotonautics and the Califoraata Cc mission of Housing and Community Development have adopted the Comunity Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) seac:tre of exposure. This saaaaaue considers an' energy aveeragaad A-v*ighted noise level for the evening hours, from 7:00 'pae to 10:00 peat increasrd by 5 do and the late evening ind morning hour noise levals, from 10:00 pm to 7:00 am, increasad by 10 dE. The daytime noise levels are combined with these, wetighced levels, and averaged, to obtain a C4,ZL value. I The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is considering a Federal policy of noise control and acceptable levels of noise exposure. The measure of exposure most likely to be used, is the Day-Night Avcrage Noise Level, Ldn. This %assure is essentially an average of the A-weighted noise levels experienced fur each. 24-hour period. Late eveniug and early morning (10:00 pm to 7:00 ass) noise levels are move annoying, and therefore, are increased by 10 dB and averaged along with the daytime levels. This measure differs from the CNEL value only by the elimination of the S d5 of ' additional weighting applied to noise experienced during the hours from . 7:00 pm. to 10:00 pm. For most transportation noise sources, the two we"ureay * - 'CNEL and Loa "re about equal. .. w� A comparative description of outdoor CNEL values, iet provided in Sheet A--1. Sheet II-2 indicates land use suitability in terms of CNEL values as well as other recognized measures of noise %txposure. r Table 2 PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION APPROACH VOLUMES • BEACH HOULLWARD ANY) STARK STREET InLerst,c:r l on Movement 19741/ 1976_2/ Futurt!.P Northbound AM 1758 1935 1940 tiorthbottnd PI`1 1643 2030 x060 Southbound A`1 839 925 925 Southbound 1'M 1913 2105 2105 Northbound left AM 24 25 25 Northbound left PH 39 45 45 Southbound left AH 25 30 40 • ' Sottthbouitd left PM 128 140 200 Fnstbouttd AM 24 25 25 Eastbound PM 35 40 40 W etbound AM 129 140 185 t•h•sthound PM 122 135 190 1 / 1-474 hand count was conducted by Cal Trans in May for mid week. 2! 1976 count6 were eat. gated by adding 10 percr.n.t to 1974 couriits. ;ti Future counts are 1976 counts plus proposed development traffic. r MINUTES Councxi Chamber, Civic Center Huntington Beach, California Monday, .June 7, 1976 Mayor Wieder call the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach to order at 7:00 P.M. ROLL CALL Present: Bartlett, Pattinson, Gibbs, Siebert, Shenkman, Wieder Absent: Coen The Pledge of Allegiance was given by all present in the Council Chamber. The Invocation was given by Mr. Rodney Jones, President of the: Huntington Beach Historical Society. RECESS - HUNTINGTON BRACE{ REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RECONVENED Chairman Wieder called the regular meeting of the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency to order. ROLL CALL Members Present: Bartlett, Pattinson, Wieder, Gibbs, Siebert, Shenkman Members Absent: Coen MINUTES On motion by Bartlett, second Shenkman, the Agency approved and adopted minutes of the regular meeting of. May 17, 1976 as written and on file in the office of the Secretary. Motion carried. REgni-MENDATION OF REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RE: APPOINTMENT UP SEPARATE AGENCY - CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE RESOLUTION The Secretary presented a Statement of. the Action of the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency taken at its adjourned regular meeting held May 269 19760 recommending that Council appoint a separate Redevelopment Agency. A cornrreuniration dated June 39 1976, from the Acting City Administrator was also presented relative to the formation of a separate Redevelopment Agency. On motion by Pattinson, scconO Shenkman, the Agency requested the City Attorney to prepare a resolution establishing a separate agency and that the City Council and the City Attorney discuss with a recognized expert in Redevelopment Law, the pros and cons of a separate Agency prior to making a final decision. The motion Was --~^d by the following vote: Bartlett, Pattinson, Wieder, Gibbs, Siebert, Shenkman s None NT: Coen ,r Paige #2 - Council Minutes - 6/7/76 Chairman W•teder appointed members SieberC and rattinson to meet with the Mayor and City Attorney during discussions with the recognized expert in Redevelopment Law. AD.jOURNANT On motion by Pattinson, second Snenkman, the regular meeting; of the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency adjourned. Motion carried. PRESENT.".TLON OF AWARDS - L.ETICIA VALENZUELA Q ROBIN HIGGINS Mr. Warren G. Hall, City Treasurer/Risk Manager presented awards to Robin Higgins and j Letiria Valenzuela in appreciation for their translation of the City Safety Manual into Spanish. PRESENTATION TO COUNCIL - SOUTH COAST REPERTORY BOARD OF TRUSTEES Dr. Richard Lake, representing the. South Coast Repertory Board of Trustees} presented copies of the 10th Anniversary B --oklet of the South Coast Repertory to the City Council. PROCLAMATION • 'SIGN UP AMERICA WEEVS TN HUNTINGTON BEACH' - JUNE 14 - JULY 4 I The Mayor presented a proclamation designation June 14, 1976 through July 4, 1976 as 'Sign Up America Weeks In Huntington Beach' . The proclamation was presented to a representative of the Huntington Center Merchants Association. i PRESENTATION OF PLAQUE - CATYfAIN JAMES FOURNIER - U.S. COAST GUARD Mayor Wieder presented a plaque to Captain James Fournier, Unites States Coast Guard and the crew of the Burton Island in appreciation of their bringing recog-nition to the city by placing a "Parking Facility" sign at McMurdo Sound, Antaxz tica, in recognition of Huntington Beach, the fastest growing city in the nation. The Mayor extended the appreciation of the community for the fine representation that the crew of the Burton Island gives in their standby ice breaking operations for vessels in the area and geological survey of the North Slope. PRESENTATION OF PLA UF. - JUDGE CHARLES BAUER - RETIRED SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE Councilman Bartlett, on behalf of the Mayor and City Council, presented a plaque to Judge Charles Bauer in appreciation of his services to the city and ..-aunty of Orange. ELECTION OF VINCE MOORHOUSE AS PRESIDENT Or WORLD LIFE SAVING On motion by Pattinson, second Shenkman, Council congratulated Mr. Vince Moorhouse, Director of Harbors, Beaches and Development on his election as president of World Life Saving. Motion carried. FLOOD CONTROL CONFERENCE - WASHINGTON, D.C. Ms . Ed Just addressed Council regarding t .e forthcoming conferen.e on flood control in Washington, D.C. fie requested that Council take action prior to June 21, 19769 to . Authorize the Mayor or a representative to attend the conference . Page #3 - Council. Minutes - 6/7/76 PRESENTATION OF PIA UE - DR. DUDLEY BOYCE PRESIDENT OF GOLDEN WEST COLLEGE. Mayor Wieder presented a plaque to Dr. Dudley Boyce in recognitJ on of his service to the community as President of Golden West College. Dr. Boyce thanked the Council and cited the contributions of his colleagues and staff. INVITATION TO MISS HUNTINGTON BEACH PAGEANT Mayor Wieder introduced Miss Huntington Beach of 1975, Sheri Chiesa, to the Council and audience. Miss Chiesa, un behalf of the Women's Division of the Huntington Beach Chamber of Commerce, invited the Council and audience to the Miss Huntington Beach Pageant to be held in the Huntington Beach High School Auditorium June 19, 1976. CONSENT CALENDAR - ( ITEMS APPROVED) At the request of Councilman Shenkman the consent calendar items pertaining to the minutes were removed for separate consideration. Councilman Shenkman requested that it be recorded that he had received campaign contributions from the firm of Graziadio b Graziadio and the Lusk Company. I On motion by Bartlett, second Siebert, the Following items were approved as recommended by the following roll call vote: AYES: Bartlett'-, Pattinson, Gibbs, Siebert, Shenkman, Wieder NOES: None ABSENT: Coen DEDICATED IMPROVEMENTS - TRACT 8662 - GRAZIADIO b GRAZIADIO Accepted improvements dedicated for public use in Tract No. 8662, located southeast of. Pearce and Banton Streets, authorized release of the Faithful Performance portion of the Improvement Bond only, the Monument Bond and the termination of the Subdivision Agreement, and directed the Clerk to notify the developer and the Treasurer to notify the bond'_ng company. AMENDED REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT 75-Dl - MAYFAIR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY - Approved amer.ded Reimbursement Agreement No. 75-D1 between the City and Mayfair Construction Company for drainage facilities built in Drainage District #9 and authorized execution by thF. Mayor and City Clerk. PLANS d SPECIFICATIONS - MANPOWER EMPLOYI-LENT & TRAINING CENTER - MSC-120 - Approved plans and specifications for the remodeling of the Edison building located at 538 Main Street f,. : the purpose of creating a Manpower Employment and Training Facility and directed the Clerk to advertise for bids. WEST ORANGE. COUNTY WATER BOARD BUDGET - Ratified proposed budget for fiscal year 1976-77 as vecommended by the Secretary to the West Orange County dater Board. CONTRACT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES - ENC NEER114G GEOLOGIST - COUNTY OF ORANGE - Approved Agreement between the City and the County of Orange for the service to the City of an Engineering Geologist for review and inspection services in conformance Wlth provisions of the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones Act, and authorixr_d execution by the Mayor and City Clerk. Page #4 Council Minutes - 6/7/76 'CITY ADMINISTRATIVE PLAN FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF PUBLIC LAW 85-606 - Approved City Administrative Plom for Implementation of Public Law 85-606 as requested by the State Office of Emergency Services. FINAL PAYMENT - .LAMBERT PARK - Authorized payment of $86,951.48 from the Park Acquisition and Development Fund to Alva Wilson Company for purchase of 1,963 acres, Arainage fees, and development costs of Lambert Park. FINAL TRACT -MAP 7743 - ALL OF TT 7743 - GEORr.E A. ARMSTRONG - Approved and accepted offers of dedication and improvement subject to completion of requirements as shown, on Final Tract Map No.. 7743, being all of Tentative Tract No. 7743 located west of Marina View Driv^, north of Los Patos, and southeast of Warner examined and certified by the Director -f Public Works and the Secretary to the Planning Commission as being substantially in accordance with the tentative man as filed with, amended and Approved by the Planning Commission. Acreage: 1.841; Developer George A. Armstrong, Huntington Beach, California, Lots: 10: adopted map subject to stipulations as follows: 1. Deposit of fees for water, sewer, drainage, engineering and inspections. 2. Park and Recreation Fees shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. 3. Certificate of insurance. 4. The final map shall be recorded prior to the expiration of Tentative Tract Map No. 7743 on September 29 1977. I Further instructed the City Clerk that she shall not affix her signature to the map 'nor release such wap for preliminary processing by t;ie County or for recordation until the aforementioned conditions Lave been complied wits►. FINAL .TRACT MAP 8745-AALwLL OF TT 8746 - HBIP - Approved the map and accepted the offer of dedication and improve;nent subject to completion of requirements as shown, on Final. Tract Map No. 8746, being all of Tentative Tract No. 871.6 located northwest of Graham and Orange County Flood Control District Westminster Channel (north of Edinger) examined and certified by the Director of Public Works and the Secretary to the Planning Commission as being substantially in accordance with the tentative map as filed with, amended and approved by the Planning Commission. Acreage: 35.389; Developer Huntington Beach Industrial Park, Newport Beach, California, Lots: 54; adopted -nap subject to stipulations as follows: 1. Deposit of fees for water, sewer, drainage, engineering and inspections. .2. Certificate of insurance. 3. The final map shall be recorded prior to the expiration r,f Tentative Tract No. 8746 on June 2, 1977. Further instructed the City Clerk that she shnll not affix her signature to the map . . nor release such snap for preliminary processing by the County or for reeordation until the aforernan;i.nned conditions have been complied with. PUBLIC HEARING - PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT 76-2 MCFADDEN AVENUE - APPROVED - ORD. 2074• FIRST READING Mayor Wieder announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing on Precise Plan of Street alignment 76-2, a proposal to modify the present alignment Page #5 - Council Minutes - 6/7/76 of McFadden Avenue at the westerly boundary of the industrial properties located approximately 1,480 feet east of the centerline of nolsa Chica Street. Said Precise Plan would result in a street opening approximately twenty-four (24) feet in width and twenty (20) feet in length to be located between two proposed cul-de-sac streets. Said precise plan would amend Precise Plan of Street Alignment 75-6 (ordinance No. 2006) which presently indicates a termination of McFadden Avenue into abutting cul-de-sac arrangements at the subject location stated above. Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 76-2 is proposed to allow limited vehicular and pedestrian access between the industrial area to the east and the residential area to the west. The City Clerk informed Council that all legal requirements for notification, publication and posting had been met and that she had received na communications or written protests to the matter. The Planning Director presented a resume ' of the matter and the available alternative. The City Attorney reported on legal ramifications of the matter. The Planning Director reported on the concern expressed by some of the residents relative to the unsightly condition of Bolsa Chica Street, stating that it was the recommendation of the Planning Conenissjon that the matter be referred to the City Administrator. Mayor Wieder declared the nearing open. Mr. Max Fraley, 51b1 McFadden Avenue, City, addressed Council regarding the proposal. He stated that he hoped that if it did not prove feasible that the street could be closed as originally intended. Discussion was held between the Council and Mr. Fraley. Discussion was held between the Council and the Director of Public Works regarding traffic controls. Mr. Wallace Rodacker, Attorney representing the Robinwood Hom.owner's Association, addressed Council and presented reasons why he believed Alternate #3 was an acceptable solution with the appropriate modifications relative to traffic patterns and regulations. Mr. Rudy Rrebrick, Cambay Iaane, addressed Council and stated that he believed bicycle lands or painting were needed to limit the traffic to one lane in each direction to maintain the safety of the street, Discussion was held and the Director of Public Works spoke regarding the matter. There being no one further present to speak on the matter and there being no further protests filed either oral or written the hearing was closed by the Mayor. A motion was made by Councilman Shenkman, second Bartlett, that the City Council adopt Alternate #3 based on the following findings of fact: a) The proposed precise plan of street alignment and additional • traffic control devices will reduce the conflict of trunk tr-Affic encroaching Lnto the predominantly residential area a 'Page 46- Council 'Minutes - 6/7/76 and will compliment the recently created secondary east/west connector (Argosy Drive) which more efficiently accommodates the east/west truck traffic movement emanating from the adjacent industrial park. b) The proposed alignment by minimizing the traffic conflicts of the industrial uses to the north and east will implement the mitigation recommendations of EIR No. 73-16, which was approved by the City Council in March of 1973. c) Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 76-2 will provide for convenient accessways through the tweet-four (24) foot opening aud ,also preserve the local street characteristit;s of McFadden Avenue in the residential area; that staff be directed to carefully monitc r traffic flows and conditions on the ..matter including street width, the success of the plan, whether there should be additional traffic safety devices for the safety of children, for report back to 'Council within 30 days of completion. Motion carried. Discussion was held and Councilman Siebert spoke concerning the construction of the wall, as it relates to safety. '. The, Clerk was directed to give Ordinance No. 2074 a first reading by title - "AN 66INANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE IiUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY AMENDING DISIrRICT MAP 18 TO INCI.UDI' PRECISE PLAN No. 76-2 WHICH MODIFIES THE ALIGNMENT OF MCFADDEN AVENUE AT THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE INDUSTRIAL i?F�OPERTIES LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 17480 FEET EAST OF THE CENTERLINE OF BOLSA CHICA STREET RESULTING IN A STREET OPENING TO BE LOCATED BETWEEN TWO FROPOSED CUL-DE-SAC STREETS." On motion by Shenlanan, �rcond Siebert, Council. waived further reading of Ordinance No. 2074. Motion tarried. PUBLIC .HEARING - APPEAL TO DENIAL OF USE PERMIT 76-t2 APPEAL APPROVED - NEGATIVE DECLARATION 76-11 - ADOPTED Mayor Wieder announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing on an appeal filed by Spruce Grove, 7ne. , to the denial by the Planning Commission of Use Permit No. 76-12, to permit the construction of a 193 unit apartment complex pursuant to Section 9202. 3 of the Huntington beach Ordinance Code. The subject .`property in located .on the south side of the San Diego Frr�eway at the east end of ' ' San Angelo Drive in the R3 (Medium High Density Residential District) . The City Clerk informed Council that all legal. requirements for notification, publication and posting had been met and that she had received no communications or written protests to the matter.. The Planning; Director presented a resume' of the matter and 41hn reasons for the '. ' hlanning Commission's recommendation of denial. , ':Mayor Wieder declared the }gearing open. Page #7 - Council Minutes - 6/7/76 i Mr. .tames Carter, appellant, addressed Council and presented slides of the area involved. He spoke regarding access provisions, the traffic report which had been prepared, security provisions and other details of the proposed project. He presented Council with a density graph, acoustical sight-line analysis, communications from the City of Westminster and the Huntington Beach Police Department and a communication he had written on the matter. Mrs. Barbara Youngblood, Wells Road, Westminster, a resident adjacent to the proposed project, addressed Council and stated her opposition to the project because of the traffic problems .she believed would occur. Mr. Jay Lvoster, representing the Huntington Villa Apartment Owners Association, addressed Council. in opposition to the project because of density and also the traffic r;ituation. Mr. Joe Gustos, addressed Council in opposition to the project, as he did not believe the project was adequately designed. Mr. William A. Kunzman, representing Crommelin-Pringle & Associates, Inc. , Urban Trar_sportation and Traffic Engineers, Placential, addressed Council regarding the studies which had been conducted. There being no one further present to speak on the matter and there being no further protests filed, either oral or written 'Che. hearing was closed by the Mayor. Discussion was held between the Council and the Planning Director regarding the history of the proper'.:;; and its :coning designation. A motion was made by Shenlanan, second Gibbs, to sustain the decision of the Planning Commission and deny the appeal as outlined based on the findings of the Planning Connission. The motion failed to pass by the following vote: AYES: Gibbs, Shenkman NOES: Bartlett, Pattinson, Siebert, Wieder ABSENT: Coen On motion by Pattinson, second Siebert, Council adopted Negative Declaration No. 76-11, overruled the decision of the Planning Commission and granted the appeal based on findings of fact as follows: 1. The proposed 193 unit apartment development is in conformance with the applicable development standards of the R 3 zoning on the subject property. 2. The design and layout of the project has mil{gated the size, shape and orientation of the subject property as it relates to the adjacent .freeway and multiple residential units. 3. The access to the project and the traffic to be generated therefro:i w.'.11 not be detremental to the henithp welfare, and safety of those pe> >ons residing in adjacent development. 4. The project has been designed so as it significantly mitigate the noise emanating from the adjacent freeway traffic and the total security concept will help mitigate any resultant crime problems; r - ` 40 Page #8 - Council Minutes - 6/7/76 further directed that the matter be referred to the Planning Department for the ► appropriate conditions of approval. The motion was passed by the following vote: AYES: Bartlett, Pattinson, Siebert, Wieder NOES: Gibbs, Shenkman ABSENT: Coen i PUBLIC HEARING - RES OF INDENT NO. 42LA - VACATION - PORTION OF WYCHITA AVE I RES NO. 4248 - ADOPTED - ORDERING VACATION Mayor Wieder announced that this was the dry and hour set for a public hearing on Resolution of Intention_ No, 4241 to vacate a portion of Wichita Avenue between the railroad tracks and Alabama Street. i The City Clerk informed Council that all legal requirements for publication and posting had been met and that she had received no communications or written protests to the vacation. Mayor Wieder declared the hearing open. There being no one present to speak on the matter and there being no protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by th - Mayor, On motion by Bartlett, second Shenkman, Council approved the vacation of a portion of Wichita Avenue between the railroad tracks and Alabama Street. Motion carried. The Clerk was directed to gi-•e Resolution No. 4248 a reading by title - "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF WICHITA AVENUE BETWEEN THE RAILROAD TRACKS AND ALABAMA STREET. On motion by Bartlett, second Shenkman, Council waived further reading of Resolution No. 4248 and adopted same by the following roll call vote: AYES: Bartlett, Pattinson, Coen, Gibbs, Siebert, Shenkman, Wieder i NOES: None ABSENT: Coen PUBLIC HEARING - ZONE CASE 76-8 - APPROVED - ORD. NO. 2071 - FIRST READING Mayor Wieder announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing on a petition fot achange of zone from C2 ;Community Business District) to R2 (Medium Density Residential ) and an elimination of the SO ft. setback from the centerline of Seventeenth Street. The subject property is located oil the east side of Florida Street, approximately 500 feet north of Clay Avenue. The City Clerk informed Council that all legal requirements for notification, publication and posting had been met and that she had received no cormnunications or written protests to said zone case ur to the reconmiendation of approval of the Planning Commission, The Planning Director presented a resume ' of the Planning Commission's reasons for recommending approval of said ordinance. Mayor Wieder declared the hearing open. r Page #9 - Council Minutes - 6/7/76 There being no one present to speak on the matter and there being no protests filed, either oral or wrttt(yn, the hearing was closed by the Mayor. On motion by Pattinson, second Siebert Council Approved Zone Case No. 76-8. Motion carried. The Clerk was directed to give Ordinance Na. 2071 a first reading by title - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 9061 THEREOF TO PROVIDE FUR CHANGE OF ZONING ON REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF FLORIDA STREET NORTH OF CLAY AVENUE (ZONE CASE NO. 76-08). " PUBLIC HEARING - ZONE CASE NO. 76-10 - APPROVED - ORD. NO. 2072 - FIRST READING Mayor Wieder announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing on a petition for u change of zone from C/t (highway Commercial) to R2 (Medium Density Residential District) . The subject property is located 660 feet south of Ellis Avenue, approximately 240 feet east of Beach Boulevard. The City Clerk informed Council that all legal requirements for notification, publication and posting had been met and that she had received no communications or written protests to said zone case or to the reconmendatiott of and approval of the Planr.inE Commission. The Planning Direct!-- presented a resume ' of the Planning Commission's reasons for recommending ;provnl of said zone case. j Mayor Wipder declared the hearing open. Mr. .ferry Bame, representing the property owners addressed Council and stated that he would answer any questions Council may have. There being no one further present to :peak on the matter and there bring no protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor. Ili Councilman Shenkman stated for the record L`cat he had received a campaign contribution from the applicant. On motion by Bartlett, second Pattinson, Council. approve(' Zone Case No. 76-10. Motion carried. s - n d to iv Ordinance No. 207Z b title AN ORDINANCE OF THE i The Clerk was directed give 0 y CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE IIUN 1NGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 9061 THEREO^ TO PROVIDE FOR CHANGE OF ZONING ON REAL PROPERTY LOCATED 660 FEET SOUTH OF ELLIS AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 21#0 FEET EAST OF BEACH BOULEVARD (ZONE CASE NO. 76-10). On motion by Bartlett, second Pattinson, Council waived further reading of Ordinance i carried. No. 2072. Motion atn� REQUEST FOR RATE INCREASE - SEAI.'S AMBULANCCE SERVICE - APPROVED - RESOLUTION TO BE PREPARED - REPORT TO BE PRESENTED - (CA 76-•76) Mayor Wieder announced that this was thr., day and hour set for a hearing on a request from Seal 's Ambulance Service for permissior. to increase their base rate of service from $35 to $40, standby rate from $20 to $30 per hour aacl mi lvc.,@e rate from $1..50 :o $2 per mile pursuant to S. 5. 20.00 of the Huntington Rcach Municipal. Code. r Page #10 - Council Minutes - 6/7/76 The Acting City Administrator and the Police Chief reported on the matter. Mayor Wieder declared the hearing open. Mr. Larry Seal , Seal 's Ambulance Service, addressed Council regarding his requested increase. Fire Chief Picard reported on the sarvice provided by Seal 's Ambulance. There being no one further present to speak on the matter and there being no protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor. On mot.:an by Shenkman, second Siebert, Council approved the request from Seal 's Ambulance Service for a rate increase and directed the City Attorney to prepare a resolution effecting some. Motion carried. On motion by Shenkman, second Siebert, Council directed the City Attorney to investigate the feasibility of requiring financial statements from ambulance, taxi and towing services, and to prepare a resolution establishing such a requirement if feasible. Motion carried. j I REQUEST TO ADDRESS COUNCIL - CARLOTTA TINIAKOFF I Mrs. Carlotta L. Tiniakoff, addressed Council regarding an application she had made for Council Permit to conduct an arcade business. She was informed that her application would come before Council for consideration at the June 21, 1976 Council meeting. REQUEST -TO ADDRESS_ COUVCIL - GORDON OFFSTEIN Mr. Gordon Off•.stein, city resident, addressed Council regarding the Executive Management Team Report relative to the proposed Bolsa Chica Annexation and requested that Council obtain figures on the short and long term financial effect. Discussion was held. Ruth bailey, member of the Bolsa Chica Annexation Committee addressed Cet-ncil regarding the matter. RESOLUTION ADOPTED At the %equest of the Planning Director Resolution No. 4251 was withdrawn from the consent calendar, to be considered at the next regular meeting. On motion by Shenkman, ;second Bartlett, Council directed the City Clerk to read Resolution Nos. 4249, 4250, 4245, 4246, 4247, 4253, 4255, 4256, 4257 by title; waived further reading and adopted same by the following roll call vote: AYES: Bartlett, Pattinsor.., Corn, Gibbs, Siebert, Shenkman, Wieder *TOES: None ADSEW.r: None RES NO. 4249 - ADOPTED - PER DIEM WAGES POR PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS "A MSOLITION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF.THE C17.7 OF FIUNTINCfON BEACH SFCCIFYINC THE PREYATUNG RATES OF PER DIDI WAGE-3 FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT'S." Page #11 - Council. Minutes - 6/7/76 RES NO. 4250 - ADOPTED - TAX SALE - F.ASTSIDE VILLA 'PRACT - (CA 76 74) - FLORIDA d YORKTOWN "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH OBJECTING TO THE TAX SALE OF PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE EASTSTDE VILLA TRACT OF SAID CITY, AND OFFERING TO PURCHASE SAME. RES NO. 4245 - ADOPTED - EXECUTION OF DOCUMENTS - CIVIL DEFENSE d DISASTER "A RESOLUI [.ON OF THE CITY COUNCII. OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AUTHORIZING CE►•,•."AIN CITY OFFICALS TO REPREFrNr' THE CITY IN r.XECUTING DOCUMENTS IN RELATION TO CIVIL DEFENSE AND DISASTER. " RES N0. 4246 - ADOPTED -- SURPLUS FEDERAL PROPERTY - CIVIL DEFENSE PURPOSES - (CA 76-75) "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH TO ESTABLISH CITY'S ELIGIBILITY RECEIVE SURPLUS FEDERAL PROPERTY FOR CIVIL, DEFENSE PURPOSE;UNDER PUBLIC LAW 6559 85TH CONGRESS (70TH STAT. 493) ." RES N0. 4247 - ADOPTED - BENEFITS - REGISTERED VOLUNTEER DISASTER SERVICE WORKERS "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH RELATING TO WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION BENEFITS FOR REGISTERED VOLUNTEER DISASTER SERVICE WORKERS, AITO REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 1066." RES N0. 4253 - ADO MID - HUD APPLICATION - HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK ''A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IUNTINGTON BEACH RELfffING TO AN APPLICATION TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT FOR AUTHORIZATION TO TRANSFER FUNDS ALLOCATED FOR ACQUISITION AND RELOCATION TO DEVELOPMENT OF OPEN-SPACE LAND (IUNTINGTON CENTRAL. PARK) . " RES NO. 4255 - SB 821 FUNDS - BIKEWAYS & PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AUTHORIZING THE PLANNING DIRECTOR TO FILE CLAIM FOR SB 82-1 FUNDS FOR BIKEWAYS AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES." RES NO. 4256 - ADOPTED - 1980 FUNCTIONAL USAGE STUDY - FEDERAL-AID URBAN ROUTES "A RESOLUTION OF THE. CTTY COUNT CTL OF ' )iE HUNTINGTON BEACH APPROVING SAID CITY'S PORTION OF THE 1980 FUNCTIONAL USAGE. STUDY AND THE DESIGNAT'IOV OF FEDERAL-AID URBAN ROUTES IN HUNTINGTON BEACH." ICES NO. 4257 - ,ADOPTED - STANDARDS FOR NEWLAND HOUSE "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ADOPTING STANDARDS FOR THE NEWLAND HOUSE ALTERNATIVE TO THE STATE HISTORICAL BUIIDING CODE AND AUTHORIZED BY THE CALIFORNIA AnMINISTRATIVE CODE." DISASTER PREPAREDNESS TNrORMATION PROGRAM - APPROVED - (CA 76-69 The City Verk presented a transmittal from the City Administrator of the Disaster Program Information/Public Avareness Program and informing Council of. present, And planned elements. Page #12 Counicil Minutes - 6/7/76 I The Acting City Administrator informed Council that Mr. George .Thyden, City Civil nt should Council have an questions. '�; .. Defense Coordinator wasprase s o C y Discussion was held by Council regarding the function of'the City's Civil. Defenses Department. Oct motion by Bartlett, second Pattinson, Council approved the Disaster Preparedness Information Public Awareness Prugram currently being implemented and planned by tha City's Civil Defense Coordinator. The motion was passed by the following vote: AYES: Bartlett, Pattinson, Gibbs, Siebert, Wieder NOES: Shenkman ABSENT: Coen RESOLUTION NO. 4254 - DEFERRED - EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE RELATIONS (CA 76-70) The City Clerk presented Resolution No. 4254 for consideration by Council. - "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING AND ADDING TO RESOLUTION NO. 3335 AND RESOLUTION NO. 4049 PERTAINIT,' TO EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE RELATIONS AND THE EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT TEAM." i Following discussion, on motion by Pattinson, second Siebert, Council deferred Lesolution No. 4254 to the June 21, 1976 Council meeting. Motion carried. Following discussion, on motion by Pattinson, second Shenkman, Council referred thr matter of the salaries of the City Clerk and City Treasurer to City Labor Relations Counsel, Mr. Nicholas Counter, for analysis and legal direct:.on to Council. The motion was passed -'by the following vote: AYES: Bartlett, Pattinson, Gibbs, Shenkman, Wieder NOEf7 Siebert ABSENT: Coen i BUDGET RETREAT UPDATE BY ACTING CITY ADMINISTRATOR The Acting- City Administrator brought Council up to date on budget matters. ORDINANCES ADOpTED On .motion by Pattinson, second Bartlett, Council directed the Clerk to read Ordinance Nos. 2062, 20639 2065, 20669 2068, 2069, and 2070 by title; waiNled and further reading and adopted same by the following vote: AYES: Bartlett, Pattinson, Gibbs, Siebert, Shenlonan, Wieder NOhs: None ABSENT: Coen I ORB. NO. 2062 - FIRST READING - ZONE CASE 76-07 "AN 'ORDTNANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BF.j1C11 ORDI14ANCE CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 9061 THEREOF TO PROVIDE FOR CHANGE. OF 40NING 01i, REAL- PROPERTY- LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF .CRYSTAL STREET APPROXIMATELY 155 FEET SOUTH OF GARFIELD AtItWI E (ZONE CASE NO. 76-07).0 Page #13 - Council Minutes - 6/7/76 ORD. NO. 2063 - FIRST READING - ZONE CASE 76-12 "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CI'-Y OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 9061 TIIEREOF TO PROVIDE FOR CHANGE OF ZONING ON REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF MANSION AVENUE AND M.%1-3 STREET. (ZONE CASE NO. 76-12). " ORD. NO. 2065 - FIRST READING - AMENDS CODE - TRUCK ROUTES "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH MUNICIPAI. CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 10.24.010 THEREOF PERTAINING TO TRUCK ROUTES." ORD. NO. 2066 - FIRST READING - SPEED LIMITS ON MCFADDEN AVENUE "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING SECTIONS 10. 12.010, 10. 12.020 AND 10. 12.0409 PERTAINING TO SPEED LIMITS ON MCFADDEN AVENUE. " ORD. NO. 2068 - FIRST READING - AMENDS CODE - DRAINAGE FEES "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 14.48.050, PERTAINING TO DRAINAGE FEES." - - ORD. N0. 2g69 FIRST READING ZONE CASE 76-11 "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 9061 THEREOF TO PROVIDE FOR CHANGE OF ZONING ON REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF BEACH BOULEVARD AND SOUTH OF ATLANTA AVENUE (ZONE CASE NO. 76-11) ." ORD. NO. 2070 - FIRST READING - ZONE CASE 76-15 "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 9061 THEREOF TO PROVIDE FOR A MODIFICATION OF THE BUILDING SETBACK LINES ON GARFIELD AVENUE AND SEVENTEENTH STREET (ZONE CASE, NO. 76-15) ." ORDINANCES - FIRST READING o b Gibbs, second Shenkman Council directed the Clerk to give ordinance On motion y G s, , E i Nos. 2073 and 2075 a first reading by title, and waived further reading of same by the following vote: AWES: Bartlett, Pat:tinson, Gibbs, Siebert, Shenkman, Wieder NOES: None ABSENT: Coen i ORD. No. 2073 - FIRST READING - DRAINAGE FEE. DEFERMENTS "AN ORDINANCE. OF THE: CITY OF IR1NTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING THERETO SECTION 14.48.080 ENTITLED 'DRAINAGE FEE DEFERMENTS' . I I Page #14 - Council Minutes - 6/7/76 ORD. NO. 2075 - FIRST READING • BUILDING PERMIT FEES "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HIMINGTON B>a.4CH MUNiCIPAL CODE BY AMENDING SECTIO;1 17.04.070 THEREOF PERTAINING TO BUILDING PERMIT FEES." MW[2111S APPOINTMENTS TO COUNCIL COMMITTEES AND LIAISON APPOINTMENTS TO COKIISSSION5 AND COMMITTEES APPROVED On motion by Pattinson, second Bartlett, Council approved the following appointments mode by the Mayor: City Administrator Liaison Wieder, Pattinson, Gibbs - Cit}r. Policy S Goals Wieder, Pattinson, Coen EMT Liaison Pattinson, Siebert, Bartlett Public SafetX Liaison - Fire, Police, Buildings Harbors d Beaches Pattinson, Siebert, Bartlett Community Services Liaison - Planning d Environmental Research, Library, Recreation & Parks Gibbs, Coen, Shenkman Su port Services - 'Treasurer, Attorneys Clerk, Personnel, Finance Wieder, Gibbs, Bartlett 1 Labor Relations Lini.soa Wieder, Shentman, Coen i Planning, Commission b Design Review Board Liaisy.n Pattinson, Shenkman Personnel Board Liaison Wieder, Pattinson Library Board Liaison Coen, Gibbs Recreation & Parks Liaison Siebert, Coen _Economic. Advisory Commission Liaison Wieder, Shenk;.,-,n Le&islmtive Council Co::rnirtee Waison Wieder, Siebert, Bartlett Commission on the Ha diva d Liaison Gibbs, Bartlett Page #15 - Council Minutes - 6/7/76 Pro ect Area, Committee Liaison Pattinson, Shenkrran Public Facilities CoEEoration Liaison Wieder, Pattinson Equal Employment Opportunities Liaison Siebert, Gibbs Council on A ing Siebert, Bartlett, Gibbs Bicentennial Commission Liaison Pattinson, Siebert Allied Arts Commission I..iaison Gibbs, Shenkman Environmental Council Liaison Siebert, Gibbs Human Resources Liaison Gibbs PEAT, MARWICK b MITCHELL & COMPANY Councilman Shenkrnan spoke regarding his meeting with the Economic Advisory Commission stating that five firms had been interviewed to conduct the City audit. j On motion by Shenkman, second Siebert, Council approved the firm of Peat, Marwick, Mitchell and Company, Los Angeles, to conduct the City audit for the ensuing year. Motion carried. PROPOSED CHANTER AMENDMENTS Councilman Shenkman stated that he would like to add the removal of Department, Ifeads from the Civil Service System to his list of proposed amendments to the city charter. Councilman Shenkman stated that he would recommend that the establishment of Councilinatic Districts also be included. The City Clerk was requested to maintain a list of amendments to the Charter which have been suggested by Council to be available at the time the committee is formed. JOINT MEETING BETWEEN CITY C411NCIL, LIBRARY BOARD d ECONOMIC ADVISORY COMMISSION Mayor W{eder announced that a joint meeting between the City Council., Library Board and Economic Advisory Commission was scheduled for June 8, 1976. PARKING OF OVERSIZE VEHICLES Councilman Shenkman requested that Administration investigate the matter of oversize vehicles being parked in residential neighborhoods. At Page #16 - Council Minutes - 6/7/76 The Mayor presented an informal petition to the City Clerk listing -approximately nine signatures of persons requesting a weight restriction added to S. 10.44.060 of the Municipal Code and opposing Section 9106.5 of the Ordinance Cade. MEADOWLARK AIRPORT STATUS In response to a question by Councilman Shenkman, Mayor Wieder stated that a report would be forthcoming from the Federal Aviation Administration relative to Meadowlark Airport, Fireman Mike Johnson - Montreal Olympics Fire Chief Picard announced that Fireman Mike Johnson had qualified to enter in 500 meter two-man Kayak race in the Montreal Olympics. TRANSFER OF MONEYS FROM SPECIAL CAS TAX FUND Councilman Siebert acknowledged the receipt of the City Attorney Opinion relative to the legality of transferring moneys from the Special Gas Tax fund to the General Fund and which stated that such transfer is valid. HB BICENTENNIAL COMMISSION COMMUNICATION - RECOMMENDATION FOR APPOINTMEW - DEFERRED The Clerk presented a communication from the Bicentennial Commission recommending that Steve Pressley be appointed to Commission membership. On motion by Wieder. , second Shenk-nan, Council directed that said communication be received and filed until the Council has met- with the various commissions. PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION - ASSISTED HOUSING QUARTERLY REPORT - FUTURE REPORTS REQUESTED The City Clerk presentee a transmittal from the Planning Department of the Assisted Housing Quarterly Report locumenting the activities of the Orange County Housing Authority in the City from January, 1976 to March, 1976 as well as total activity to date. On motion by Pattinson, second Siebert Council requested that future quarterly reports documenting the activities of the Orange County Housing, Authority in the City be provided to them. PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION - 1976 POPUI..ATION The City Clerk presented a transmittal from the Planning Department of a 1976 Population Estimate which should take precedence over previo.,s January, 1976 estimates for the City. The figure of 151,500 to be certified by the State Department of Finance. GARFIELD AVENUE STORM DRAIN - HUNTINGTON BEACH-FOUNTAIN VALLEY COOPERATIVE PROJECT EXPENDITURE APPROVED The City Clerk presented a communication frum the Director of Public Works regarding a proposed cooperative project between the City and the City of Fountain Valley whizil would resolve a ponding water problem on a portion of Garfield Avenue, west of Brookhurst Street; with city's share of expenditure eligible for Gas Tax funding. Page #17 - Council Minutes - 6/7/76 i On motion by Shenkman, second Gibbs, Council approved an estimated expenditure of $2,5GO for said cooperative project between the City and th'2 City of Fountein Valley. The motion was passed by the following vote: AYES: Bartl,att, Pattinson, Gibbs, Siebert, Shenkman, Wieder NOES: Nor. ABSENT: ',,oe:n ECONOMIC: ADVISORY COWfISSION COMMUNICATION - REFERRrl) TO BUDGET SESSION The City Clerk presented the initial review by the Economic Advisory Commission of the City's 1976-77 Preliminary Budget with commerts and recommendation. I On motion by Wieder, second Shenkman, Council referred said communication to the City Council budget session. Motion carried. ITEMS RECEIVED AND FILED BY THE CITY COUNCIL 1. Joint application to P.U.C. of Southern California Gas Company and Pacific Lighting Service Company for authorization to continue Lo submit new and/or revised Gas Exploration and Development Projects for additional 3 year period. 2. Application to P.U.C. of Continental Trailways, Inc. , and American Buslines, Inc. for increase in Passenger Fares and Express Charges. 3. Harbors d Beaches Department Monthly Activity Report - April, 1976 EXECUTIVE SESSION CALLED Mayor Wieder called an Executive Session of Council for the pbrpose of discussing personnel and pending litigation matters. RECESS Mayor Wieder called a recess of Council . RECONVENE The meeting was reconvened by Mayor Wieder. t0JOURNMEX'L On motion by Pattinson, second Wieder, the recular meeting of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach adjourned to Tuesdio-r, Jame H, 1976 at: 7:30 P.M. in Room B-8 Civic Center. Motion carried. City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City Krr QT: of Huntington Beach, California Alicia M. Wentworth Harriett M. Wieder U ty Clerk ttayor Page #17 - Council Minutes - 6/7/76 On motion by Shenkman, second Gibbs, Council approved an estimated expenditure of $2,500 for said cooperative project between the City and the City of Fountain Valley. The motion was passed by the following vote: AYES: Bartlett, Pattinson, Gibbs, Siebert, Shen'.o:.,.u, Wieder NOES: None ABSENT s - Coen ECONOMIC ADVISORY COMMISSION COMMUNICATION - REFERRED TO BUDGET SESSION The City Clerk presented the initial review by the Economic Advisory Commission of the City's 1976-77 Preliminary Budget withcomments and recommendation. On motion by Wieder, second Shenkman, Council referred said communication to the City Council budget session. Motion carried. ITEMS RECEIVED AND FILED BY THE CITY COUNCIL 1. Joint application tc P.U.C. of Southern California Gas Company and Pacific Lighting Service Company for authorization to continue to submit new rand/or revised Gas Exploration and revelopment Projects for additional 3 year period. 2. Application to P.U.C. of Continental Trailways, Inc. $ and American Buslines, Inc. for increase in Passengnr Fares and Express Charges. 3. Harbors d Beaches *Department Monthly Activity Report - April, 1.976 EXECUTIVE SESSION CALLED .............. Mayor Wieder called an Executive Session of Council for the ;urpose of diactissing personnel and pending litigation matters. MUMS Mayor Wieder called a recess of Council. RECONVENE The meeting was reconvened by Mayor Wieder. AwouRNMEn On motion b;r Pattinson, second Wieder, the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Huntington Brtch adjourned to Tuesday, June 8, 1976 at 7:30 P.M. in Room B-6 ,_=4 Civic Center. Motion carried. city Clex',c and ex-ufficia Glerk of the City Council of the City ATTESTs of Huntington Beach, California .,...,......n I Alicia ti. Wentworth Haryriett M. 111ader 1ua City Clerk Mayor •:�"� i MINUTES Council Chamber, Civic Center Huntington Beach, California. Mond&y, May 3, 1976 Mayor Wieder called the regular meeting of the City Cour.� il of the City of Huntington Beach to order at 7:00 P.M. ROLL CALL i f Presents Bartlett, Pattinson, Coen, Wieder, Gibbs, Siebert, Shenkman Absent: None RECESS - HB REDEVELOPKENT AGENCY CONVENED Mayor Wieder called a recess of the Council. She then called the regular meeting of the Huntington Beach Redevelcpment Agency to order. l ROLL CALL Members Present: Bartlett, Pattinson, Coen, Wieder, Gibbs, Sieber,'.-, Sh�!nkman Members Absent: None MINUTES On motion by Pattinson, second B�rtlett, the minutes of the regular meeting of April 19, 1976 were approved and adopted as written and on file in the Office of the Secretary. The motion was passed by the following vote: APES: Bartlett, Pattinson, Coen, Wi,;4er, Gibbs, Siebert, Shenkman NOES: None ABSENT: None ADJOURNMENT On motion. by Pattinson, second Bartlett, the regular meeting of the Huntington Beech Redevelcpwwnt Agency adjourned. Motion cnrried. RECONVENE COUNCIL The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach was teconvenad by the Mayor. PRESENTATION OF CHECK BY GOLDEN WEST HOMEOWNERS ASSOC - SHIPLv.Y NATURI: C ER Mr. Trighams, reoresenting the Golden West Homeowners Association presented a check in the waount ox $1000 to the Mayor to be used towArd capital improvement to the Shipley Unture Center in Huntington Centre•1 Park. Page #2 - Council Minutes - 6 f . g PROGRAM TO HONOR MISS HUNTINGTON BEACH QUEENS - WOMEMIS DIV - CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Mrs. Betty Hartnett, Chairman of the City Beautificatior, Program of the Women's Division of the Huntington Beach Chamber of Commerce, addressed Council and extended An invitation for the Council and community to attend a Program sponsored by the. Women's Division of the Chamber of Commerce on May 12, 1976 which will honor all Miss Huntington Beach Queens from 1965-1976. HUNTING-"CON BEACH CITY FESTIVAL "FREEDOM FAIR 17611 I. Dr. .Jake Abbot, Chairman of the Huntington Beach City Festival "Freedom Fair 176" presented an invitation to the City Council and community to attend the "Freedom Fair 176" to be held at Murdy Park. PROCLAMATION - SENIOR CITIZENS' MONTH - MAY, 1976 Mayor Wieder presented a Proclamation designating the month of May, 1976, as Senior Citizens' Month in the City of Huntington Beach of Mr. Mike Rodgers, Chairman of the Huntington Beach Council on Aging. PRROOC VV-.TION - "MUNICIPAL CLERK'S WEEK" - MAY 10-14, 1976 Mayor Wieder presented a Proclamation to City Clerk, Alicia M. Wentworth, declaring 'May 10-14, 1976 as "Municipal. Clerk's Week" in the City of Huntington Beach. CONSENT CALENDAR - (ITEMS REMOVED) Mayor Winder announced that a communication had been received from the applicant for Final Tract Map 8993 requesting that said matter be deferred to the May 17, 1976 meeting. CONSDIT CALENDAR - (ITEMS APPROVED) On.motion by Bartlett, second Coen, the following items were approved as recommended by 'the following roll call vote: AYES: Bartlett, Pattinson, Coen, Wieder, Gibbs, Siebert, Shenkman NOES: None ABSENT: None MINUTES Approved and adopted minutes of the adjourned regular: meeting of February 23, 19769 regular meeting of March 15, 1976, adjourned regular meeting of March 22, 1976, (Coen abstaining) and adjourned regular meeting of March 29, 1976, as written and on file in the-Office of the City Clerk. DRDICATED IMPROVEMENTS - TRACT 8168 - SIGNAL LtMMARK INC. Accepted. improvements dedicated for public use in Tract No. 8168, located on the north side of Atlanta Avenue and the west side of Magnolia Street, authorized release of. the Faithful Performarce portion of the Improvement Bond only, termination of the Subdivision Agreemeentl a directed the City Clerk to notify the developer and the Treasurer to notify the bonding company. + Page #3 - Council Mq*s - 5/3/75 APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO PRESENT LATE CLAIM NO. 76-40 b LATE CLAIM NO. 76-40 - CARL S. CARLSON - Refused Application For Leave To Present Late Claim No. 76-40 an3 rejected Late Claim No. 76-40, filed by Thomas E. Andrews, Attorney at Law, oa behalf of Carl S. Carlson for alleged damages on or about October, 1975 in the vicinity of 206 and 210 Springfield Avenue, City. BID AWARD - ELLIS AVENUE - CC-247 - AHFP #647 - NEWLAND STREET - CC-246 - AHFP #663 S #664 - SILVER! d RUI7 The City ClerK presented a communication from the Public Works Department. stating that bids for the construction of highway improvements on Ellis Avenue ',etween Beach Bculevard and Newland Street, and Newland Street between Garfield Avenue and Talbert Avenuc had been opened at 10:00 A.M. on Monday, April 26, 1976 in the Council Chamber by the City Clark and the Director of Public Works, and that Silveri & Ruiz Construction Company, 2340 W. Orangethorpe, Fullerton, California, l was the low bidder with a Lid amount of $387,568.80. The Director of Public Works recommended that Council award the bid to Silveri S Ruiz Construction Company. The bids submitted were as follows: Silveri & Ruiz - Fullerton $387,568.80 Fleming Construction - Cerritos 394,011. 10 (corrected) Continental Grading, Paving - Costa Mesa 395,859.38 Sully Miller - Orange 396,356.58 (corrected) Clarke Construction - Compton 3969519.77 C. W. Poss. Inc. - Huntington Beach 4029083. 35 Griffith Company - Irvine 405,241.30 J. B. Crosby, Inc. - Orange 412,822.87 Nelson b Belding - Gardena 414,336.40 G. A. MacDonald Const. Co. - Montrose 4292927.00 Mac-Well. - Anaheim 462,838.98 (corrected) F. W. Richter - Sierra Madre 492,018. 10 (corrected) A motion was made by Shen}wian, second Bartlett, to award the contract for Project CC-247 and 246 - construction of highway improvements on Ellis Avenue between Beach Boulevard and Newland Street and Newland Street between Garfield Avenue and Talbert Avenue, in the cities of Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley to Silveri A Ruiz Construction Company, the lowest responsible bidder for a bid amount of $387,568.80; hold all other bids until Silveri A Ruiz Construction Company has executed the contract for said work and filed the necessary bonds and insurance, and . directed the City Clerk to notify the unsuccessful bidders of the action and return their bid bonds forthwith. The motion was passed by the following vote: AYES: Bartlett, Pattinson, Coen, Wieder, Gibbs, Siebert, Shenkman NOES: None ABSENT: None I I I i `t Page #4 - Council. Minutes - 06 PUBLIC HEPAING - RES OF INTENT 4218 - VACATION - PORTION OF GRAHMI STF EETJ SOUTH OF MC':ADDEN AVENUE - RESOLUTION NO. 4234 - ADOPTED ORDERS VACATION Mayor Wieder announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing on Resolution Of Intention No. 4218 to vacate a portion of the west side of Graham Street, south of McFadden Avenue. The City Clerk informed Council that a1I legal requirements for publication and posting had been met and that she had received no communications or written protests to the proposed vacation. i The Director of Public Works reported on the intent of the proposed vacation. i Mayor Wieder declared the hearing open. Thexe being no one present to speak on the matter and there being rio protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor. On motion by Gibbs, second Bartlett, Council approved the vacation of a portion of the west side of Graham Street, south of McFadden Avenue, by the following vote: I AYES: Bartlett', Pattir_son, Coen, Wieder, Gibbs, Siebert, Shenkman NOES: None ASSENT: None The Clerk was directed to read Resolution No. 4234 by title - "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY ;;OUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDERING THE V1'.CATIOTi OF A PORTION OF GRAHAM STREET, SOUTH OF MCFADDEN AVENUE. " On motion by Gibbs, second Bartlett, Council waived further reading of Resolution No. 4234 and adopted sane by the following roll call vote: AYES: Bartlett, Pattinson, Coen, Wieder, Gibbs, Siebert, Shenkman NOES: None ABSENT: None PUBLIC HEARING - CODE AMENDMENT 75-1 - APPROVED - ORD. NO. 2060 - FIRST R1±ADING Mayor Wieder announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing; on Code Amendment No. 75-1, initiated by the Planning Department, and referred to as "Revisions to Service Station Standards. The intent of the proposed amendment is to revise the development standards relating; to improvement of existing service station .sites, and to amend certain development standards to be commensurate with new state laws regulating service station operations. Specifically, the changes will include revisions to the types and locations of outside display of storage items, criteria for the display of adjunct uses such as utility trailers or trucks, the required landscaping standards, screening methods of outside display, etc. The City Clerk informed Council that all legal requirements for publication and hosting had been met, and that she hnd received no communications or written protests to said Coda Amendment No. 75-1. The Planning Director presented a resume ' of the planning Commission's reasons for recommending; approval. of Code Amendment No. 75-1. .j. �. VAN HOUTEN A y JA'I'�.S r its SQ HAS SocMWAVD, MAIN M. CAt MMM s=ws . (714) "S-"24 MiN f. VAN NOVrXN. PS CiwrvM4��+�w 1nr Aoa�tJa February 18, 1975 Report No. 36n,*?'S SPRUCE GROVE INC. 121 Royal Oak Rd. Anaheim, California 92807 Attention: Jim A. Carter Subject: Noise Insulation and Control, Project Site Adjacent to The San Diego Freeway, Huntington Beach, California ^•eetlemen: Drawings of the subject apartment complex have been reviewed to determine compliance of the project with the State of California Noise Insulation Standards. The following assesbmtnt and recommendations, are provided as a result of this review: External Noise Noise measurements were obtained on the site at a position correspouding to the nearest residential In Lion to the freeway. The average noise level was j found to be about 67 dB(A). A representative graphic recording of the noise is included as Sheet 1 of this report. The apartment site is located at a distance from the San Diego Freeway, such that the Coo unity Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL)** is between 70 to 80 dB. CNLL estimates are based on the following traffic conditions: San Diego FreewaX 19a5 1985 Average Daily Traffic (AM) 123,000 140#000 Traffic Speed 50 to 60 mph 50 to 60 mph Heavy Truck/Auto Mix 6% 6% Two Axle Trucks/Auto Mix 6% 6% *Refer to Appendix I, for an explanation of the A-weighted measure of noise. Refer to Appendix II, for an explanation of the CNIL measure of noise exposure. Jim A: Carter February 16, 1976 Noise Insulation and trol Page 11vo Exterior Noise Control The exterior noise exposure levels are considered excessive and must he mit- igated. It is recomended that a continuous noise barrier wall be constructed along the boundary of the project bordering the freeway. The heliht of this wall, should be at least 15 feet. It may be fo-twed as the rear wall of the carports and be constructed by use of wood stud and stucco or concrete blocks, which are well sealed. The noise barrier, as recommended above, and building layout, as indicated on the Tract Map, will reduce the freeway noise when experienced at locations on the site by from 10 to 15 dB. Noise levels at most exterior living spaces will be in the range frem about 60 to 65 dB(A), with the noise barrier and building layout as recommended snd indicated on the Tract Nap. Interior Noise Control Recommendations The following recommendations are provided in order to insure a design which complies with the State Noise Insulaticn Standards: 1. Forced Air Ventil&tion is required in all apartment units. The interior CNEL of 45 dB, as required by the State Standard, is to be met with all windows closed. Forced air ventilation should be provided, which complies with the Uniform building Code, Section 1a35. 2. Second Floor Windows in Units Directly Facing the Freeway, should rrw+.�r.r rr..rrr r rr r..w r •+r•r r r have a Sound 'Transmission Class (STC) of at 1Q4st 40 dB. (Windows In buildings nearest the Freeway only) 3. Second Floor Windows with Line-Of-Sight to the Freewa , should have a STC of at least 34 dB. 4. All Windows (other than those specified above) should be tightly fitted and weather strippad tc provide a Traffic Noise Reduction of at least 22 dB (STC rating of no leas than 25). 5. Attic Vents should be place] on the sides of the apartment buildings v hich are not directly facing the freeway. 6. Roof Sheathing should be at least �" plywood, well fitted to fora an acoustically sealed diaphram. R-19 Insulation, should be Placed in ; the attic space. J. J. VAN HOUI"EN & AS.SQCIAM Jim A. Carter fabruary 189 1976 Boise insulation and ntrol Sage 'three 7. Second Floor Enti Door* with line-of-sight to the freeway, should be • 4 th c ,. soU4 care, well fitted, and weather-stripped to provide at least an STC Rating of 30. Party Wall and Floor/Ceiling Seyaration Details and Seacificationa ' �r.wr�w+wMwr�+aw,w wr iw.� � rr.w rwrw..r. 1. Pars,;, Wall should be detailed, as follows, to provide at least a Sound '1'ransmia3ion Claus (STC) of 50 dB: A. 2" x 4" wood studs on 2" x 4" plate, b. two layers of Y" (or 5/8") Gyn:,am wall board on one side of the studs* and 5/8" Gypsum wall beard on resilient char als on the other side, c. one layer R•11 Insulation between the studs. 2. FloorjCeiling Se^paTations should be detailed as follows to provide at least an STC of 50 dBs a. standard carpet and pad, b. 1-V thick cellular concrete, c. 5/3" plywood subfloor, d. R-11 Insulation between the floor joists e. " Gypsum Board nailed to the underside of the ,joists. 3. Uncnipeted Floorn, in 4throoms, and/or kitchens, should be covered .IMwM� with" a resilient flooring material to provide an Impact- Insulation Class (IIC) of at least 50 dB, as required by the State Noise Insul- ation Standards. 4. Fl robin in Party Walls, should be avoided. However, if required, all waste and water supply pipf.n& should be isolated from the stads, plates and drywall, with no less than V of approved sealer or by use of isolation pipe clamps and pipe insulators, as manufactured by Specialty Products Company, Stanton, California, or the equivalent. * Any combination of or 5/8" thick wall board, may be used to achieve the two layers required. j. j. VAN X?OUMN Iir ASK)CIA'ES Jim AL- CartRx February l8t 1976 Noise Insulattou and ntrol Page Four 5. Sound uControA Specifications as provided in Appendix I119 should be included in the pioj ect design. Certification of C „ liance It is hereby certified that the design of the Apartment Units, adjacent to the: San Diego Freeway, as 633essed and recoamended herein, complios w'lth the State Noise Insulation Standards (CAI. ADM CCDEs Title 25, Chapter 11 Sub- chanter 1, Article 4, Sec. 1092). Very Truly Yours, J.J. VAN NQ EN G SOC T OFt /ONE. AN �`�►' 4 n J. V outen, P.E 0 1 onsul ti .ngiueer in Ac dbr �-HRN��Pv tip' JJVH/c .yr�OF Cpt����� Enclosures ` J, r. VAN 1401ITT.,N & ASSOCXAM go- 70 SO 40 100 TIC: 3:35 TO 3:50 p 90 DATE: 2-17-76 v 80 -- Paper Speed: .3 ma/sec ,.� 70 — w PRO3ECT:Ai2artment Site - S/D Freeway a 60 WCATION: 70' south-west of Freeway V H 50 A-LEVELo. L G5 L 67 L 72 o 44----- SE'r'-'---- Ia"---- w 40 30 20 A--Level Variation 10 \L ° L N, 4-0 50 60 70 so 410 A-LVnq da(A) Sheet i ' APPENDIX I A-WEICEITED SOUND LEVEL, A-I.«VEL The scale of masurtment which is most us4ful in r:-�-:iunity noise measurement ; is the A-weighted sound pressure level, cammonly called A-lave: or dB(h),. To establish the A-level, the acoustic signal is detected by the microphone and than filtered, hoavily weighting those portions of thg noise which are most -annoying to individuals. The root-Mean-square (Mi) value of this weighted signal is then read, utilizing a conventional sound Tavel Meter. It is interesting to note tb4t the A-wai;hred filter characteristic, shown below, actually amplifies the signal at frequencies between 1000 and Sala Hz. At frequencies substantially above and below this range, it ueverly rejects the acoustic signal. This weighting of sound energy corresponds approximately to the relative annoyance produced by no:.se at various frequencies. The A-weighted sound pressure levels of a few typical sources of noise are listed on the next page, 10 --�--- yv Ob to rwr .a.rww..,.�r• •w........ 111 • }O}A. fV W Cr. -20 W r -30 i -,C 20 50 100 200 500 1000 2000 5000 10000 20000 FREQUENCY , Hi ' A-WEXOHTED FILTER Ci'AMCTERISTIC The A-level of traffic noise and other Long term noise producing activiekee wi.thia and around a coamunity, varies considerably with time. Measurements of. this varying noise level, are accomplished by recording values of the A-Tavel during representative periods within a specified portion of the of the day. The three valuea recorded are: . L90 - the near minimurr, A-level, Which occurs duviing the oiaa-minute period. 90% of the time the A-level is greater than this value. _ L50 - the central tendency ,- %•-level. This value is exceeded 5G% of the time daring the one-minute measurement interval. .7110 - the near maximum A-level -As exceeded 10% of the time during the one-minute interval. Depending on the degree of A-level variation, readings of these three measures are recorded for periods of from 12 t- 60 minutes, to provide representative samples of the noise during the time period tieing examined (ie. - morning, afternoon, night). The average value of these samples, are than considered represectative of the A-level during that particular time period. SOURCE OF NOISE dHA Normal speech at 3 feet 65 + 5 Drill Press 70 + 3 Electric Typewriter 76 + 3 Diesel truck (50 MPti) 84 + 6 Portable wood saw 102 + 4 *lAI*tive to .0002 dynex/CMx At Operators ear level 1 At a position 50 feet from the roadway �«x APPENDIX II VOYSE EXPOSbi:E - COMM ITY NOISE EQUIVALE`T,f VE7. (CHEQ Xt is racognized that a given level of noise: may be more or legs tolerable, depending on the duration of exposure experienced by an individual. There :.► ra numerous measures of noise exposure which consider not only the A-level variation of noise, but, also include the duration of the disturbance. The Stake Department of Aeronautics and the Califoruia Commission of Housing and Community Da:elopuent have Adopted the Comsecunity Noise Equivalent Level. (CNEL) %assure of exposure. This measure considers an' energy averaged A-weighted poise level for the evening hours , from 7:00 pm to 10:00 pm, increased by S dB and the late evening and morning hour noise levels, from 10:00 pm to 7:00 am, increased by 10 dB. The daytime noise levels are combined with thews vCd8i:ted levels, and averaged, to obtain a CNEL value. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is considering a Federal, policy of noise control and acceptable levels of noise exposure. The measure of exposure most likely to be used, is the Day-Night Average Noise tsvel, Ldo. This measure is essentially an average of the A--weighted noise level& experienced for each 24-hour period. Late evening and early moraiug (10:00 pm to 7 :00 am) noise levels are more annoying, and therefore, &to increased by 10 dG and averaged along with the daytime levels. This Qe�,sure differs from the CNEL value only by the elimination of the 5 dB of additional weighting applied to noise experienced during the hours from . 7:00 pet to 10:00 pm. For most transportation noise sources, the two measures, - • ' L. and Ldn are about equal. - A comparativa description of outdoor CNEL values, it provided in Sher:tll--1. Sheet II-2 indicates land use suitability in terms of CNEL values as well as other recognized measures of noise en. osure. • A or Ldu 0"UTATIVE -40- OUTDOOR L9CATIOW own r iON2 and Flow Apertrrtrnt Next to Frrewry 38 Mile Frwr Tv-%A Dow At At Maju Airport . F ty"te Dawrtta^rr+Los ArW*t owntown Ma,}or With Sams Caautruction Activity etrpp�plla) ?nt Floor Apertnwt in Harlan+ Agg Fioutiro on Mskw Av#nw w.YM�w...Mr M Boston ' N'�atts — a Miles trc.•n Totten Down at M*Aw Airport 'ban —60— H 3.5 Miles from Takeoff at Small Airport Ic Let l.t Old ResirHntial Area burban Fillmm—Small Tom Cul-*•Sac Small To b Quiet Suburbanwn 5 .0 _IMc�iQ par►idantai . Toffwo Field an Farm S "r I17-1 OUTDOOR Ld. OR 61EL NOISE WOSUUS AT TYPICAL LOCATIONS 11-2 w•- F-,U 1 80 05 70 75 80 CNEL ND USE6 1 t IN•TERPRIMATION r "ot;dsritiAF!jingle Family, ': ��r �.r•.4 '- �,/� cup(rR Mobile Homes :•>' • Ahiecttie...........•....�.. •«'.. .•• CLIEA14LY ACCEPTABLE . ilAtdtigtle �emlly ;'' ', t, ii " y' Tho noise s,iposure is such w�: tg+st tfa scthrtties estocirud Trptsisrrt :; •- with tths lerA we may bo osttWd olit With &matially no Inivistrnw Carom airaraft fef►oat Ctwrooma ';: nobw IResirletnial anti+: Larrariss, t:}rurchea Roth Lukw aid outdoor ltoiss srnrtrarNttettaAVI ' Audltorl:crrn, Cancan Haut. - ;►;. f NORMALLY ACCEPTABLE Musk Shells � �:'y: �%; '�•;•, ThetEaka exposure It great ,Ijr w .1'�'1 to be of sonle conaiT1, - 7 i r Arense but commom toviltiin Carr Outeio�r$pietits► 5por� strvctlurr will nwks the ktdoor • "'''' % '•'' srrlraetrziert! atuptibls, tl WWtundj, f vq*" for steeping qusrtert. Maighborhood Parks Z/� i ab as NORMALLY UNACCEPTAWLE rset den 5t f Cot+ R ', . .Aetl p • �'•:�,-. Tits Hobe cxposunt h stgnrtr Yiatsr gacreation• Comatsrin atl mars tevsrs so that •'+: • r ,f tto ad and costly buildinf dace Buildings, Persona{, .. , _ Mtrelttet+t snd� Proleationtl exirwtrverion is nroessary to kmm sda iuste perfor•rAn(n► Carrtrrrnrcfat• igatail, t �...... s� of wdvities• (1~esidentlat ... . . lilsnrla Thoston, itataurann ansri: tyarriers mrtst bk area tad brtwtan the site and Ca►tn+ercicl•Yfiolesate, l;orne Prominent noise sources to �. wink* On outdow ernviron- _.,._.... . Ra:all, Ind.. Mfg., Utilities rnent tokrsbit.) Lhistock Farming, Animal throwing CLEARLY U;JACCEPTABLE Apthsttuto flExcrpt The noise expasurs is so Lhrsstodr). Mining. Fishing to that cunstru�etion costa to weans the indoor onvirot— l�+blkt rnant rfccoptable fat petformencs of activities would be prohibitwo. (Resilfantivtl arse: the outdoor Extensive Natural 1 omironrnent ►fiot,ld be intolor. ` able for normsl rnidential use.) PAWastion Areas 'CwmattH+ity Noia Equivalent Lire 60UNCEs HU0,"Airtrsh NohwJmpact, Planning Guldelirws for Local Aeoncitri', by Wilsey lL Han+ w4 jWt. Swonek anal Ne►7nm, 1972♦ adapted to incorporate CNEL " CNR rntswres♦ SHEET II-•2 LAND USE SUITABILITY IN NOISE IMF-ACT X-'F.A..S ix-3 , . ' . APPENDIX III • I $0M CONTROL SPECIFICATIGKS FartX Walls and Floordeilina Separations 1. All wall and floor insulation shall be saugly fitted sud stapled between studs and joists,, 2. Studs ahall not overridt plates at party walla, 3. Sound control scaler for all part; walls shall be used as £cilows and in stmict. cunform Lice with the manufacturer's specifications% l a. apply a uig-rag bead of acoustical asalent ender all bottom plates. i b. all joints where gypsum board or plywood butt together, shall be well fitted. 4. All waste and water piping shall be isolated from building construction I at points of contact with not less than 1/4" of approved sealer. S. Piping in party tolls shall be installed in. such a manner as to avoid direct cen:act with bath walls. j I 6. Provide drywall backing behind all tub, shower units. Extend backing up to lip of tub. 7. Plastic S" x 8" x 1/8" sealer, shall be wrapped around back, sides, tip and bottom of ,all electrical boxes in the party walls. Boxes shell be backed by a Minimum of 3 1/4" thick tnsulat.iOA. 8. Knock-out plates on electrical boxes in aM party walls, shall not be bent or removed where conduits are not connected to box. 9. Electrical boxes (switches, outlets, wall fixtures, etc. ) telephone outlets or television outlets in opposite faces rf party walls, crust always be separated horizontally by not less than 24". j. ;. VAN HOUTEN & ASSOCIATES fs ; CROMMEL INaPRINGLE AbUD ASSOCIA'V ESMIfuce URBAN TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ENGINEEERS 11A 0 Y0040A I.INDA ISOULf:VAFkQ PLACLtNT1A.CALIFORNIA 99670 TOLIEP►IONa 47441 902-A130 April 160 1976 Mr. .lice Carter ;'spruce Gr.;,irc Incorporated 121 Royal Oak Drive Anaheir, C alifornin 92807 Dear fir. Carter; This letter will supplement the February 11, 1976 letter report our ,firm prepared for 5-,�u regarding traffic generated by the 193 unit apartment to be located on "ran Angelo Drive in Huutingtcu Beach. For the previous report, counts were made on Malaga Lane, north of Stark Street anti on Stark Ctreet neer Beech Boulevard. Those counts were 24 hour counts that were set midday Monday and picked up midday Tuesday. Because Monday sometimes has less traffic than other days in the week, additional counts have been made to verify if the Monday counts were j representative. - Thn addi«i.onal counts were set midday Wednesday and picked up midday Thursday. These counts were on Malaga Lane both north and south of Stark Street, and also on the alley bthind the shopping center that leads into Stark Street. Tito rnsults are presented in Table 14 It can bs seen that Malaga Lan* north of Stark Strott had lose traffic for the Wednesday count than for the Monday count. The two nne way counts ware 480 and 530 vehicles pair dray raspactively. To further check on the validity of the counts. data from orange County Road Department were examined to determine the variation bet;veen day of week. Three count locations were selected and are presented In T4ble 2. For two of theses locations the Handay counts were slightly lower than the Wednesday counts. For one location the lionday count was higher. For ,all locations the :Saturday and Sunday traffic was significantly lower than the rest of the week. Saturday and Sunday traffic ire usually lower except for recreational routes, For instance, Coast Highway in the summer will probably have higher SAturday and Sunday traffic volumes than midweek. The effect of present traffic volumes on the traffic index (T.I.) calcu- lations can be seen in Tablo 3. It can be seen that rather large increases in exiating traffic can occur before the T.I. in significantly changed. HUNTINGTON BEACH PLA%!N1N(', DFPT, APR 2 01916 F11n 190 tprICza IN LAN ANG SILES ANO 0MAN00 CM-04 I18 Pugs 2 I 1 Existing traffic could triple before a T.I, of 5.0 Was exceeded. We hope this additional discuFsion concerning traffic volumes and Traffic Index will be of assistance to you. Respectfully submitted, i CROMlIELIN-PRINGLE AND ASSOCIATES INC. 71 Zeh4' vx,�, William A. KuneNan, P.E. Associate Engineer WK:pp Table 1 Present Traffic Volumes - Malaga Lane and Alley 24 hour 8-9 A.M. 5-6 P.M. Location _V,,,�1 ume Volume lume VQlum,- Malaga north of Stark Northb -ind 480 5 50 SouthbotaO 480 35 30 Malaga couch of Stark Northbound 350 25 20 Southbuund 350 10 36 Alley behind Shopping Center as it intersects Stank Northbound 530 90 20 Southbound 530 10 70 f Table 3 Traffic 'indexes for Various Volumes Volume Range Existing Traffic T. T,, Sh XqqujreL T,j j Vnxume Ranh 4.6 925 to 1110 205 to 390 4.7 1111 to 1328 391 to 608 4.8 1329 to 1581 609 to 861 4.9 1582 to 1877 862 to 1157 5.0 1878 to 2219 1158 to 1499 The Existina Traffic Volume Range �s the range of traffic to which the 720 in or out tripes attributable to the development could be added and yet stay within the T.I. Table 2 Traffic Volumcs by Day of Week Day of Location Location Location Week ._._.Z..,...�. 2.._._.. 3 Monday 69870 17,:�25 8,750 Tuesday 51323 17,945 80360 Wednesday 7r379 18,600 69650 Thursday 79226 169955 80660 Friday 79559 1.6,380 90090 Saturday 50215 159165 6,650 Suaday 31960 10,74O 40270 Location 1; Irvine Blvd . south of Bristol Northbound 7/11/72 to 7/16/72 Locution 21 Katella Ave. west of Loa Alimitos Blvd. Eaet- bound - 11/25/67 to 12/1/67 Location 3% Main Street, north of Sunflower both directions 6/3/64 to 6/9/64 r lob r I CROMME L INsPRINGLE ANO ASSOCIA► IE ., s INC. URBAN TRANSPORTATION A I'` O TRAFFIC El`tilGINEE 1146 YCAIRIA LINDA BOULQNAMO PLACENTIA. CALIP014NIA 62870 TELEPHONE M411T•W3-413C February 11, 1976 Mr. Jim Carter Spruce Grove Incorporated 121 Royal Oak Drive Anaheim, California 92807 Dear Mr. Carter: This report contains our findings relative to the traffic impact of the proposed 193 unit apartmeIT to be located on San Angelo Drive in Huntington Beach. g�.���na Trc�ffir To establish existing traffic, machine volume counts were made on Malaga Lane north of Stark Street, and on Stark Street east of Beacb Boulevard. The results of these machine counts, are contained in Table 1 under Pre`eut I a. Traffic. To determine the turning movementu at the intersection of Beach and Stark, a hand count made by CalTrans in May, 1974 was utilized and factored up 10 percent to account for traffic growth. These peak hour volumes are shown in Table 2. TLa_ fi Gencration and Distr.ibutign To establish the amount of traffic Which will be generated by the site, standard trip generation rates have been utilized . Typical trip generation rates are 10 to 12 trips per day for single fo4nily detached dwelling units, and 6 to 9 tripe per day for multiple family dwelling units. Although the Planning Department in Huntington Beach recommends a value of 6.3 I-rips per multiple family dwelling unit, n higher rate has been assumed to be safe. The value used Was 7 .5 trips per dwelling, and the 193 dwellings will pro- duce about 720 inbound and 720 outbound trips per day. Of the total trips generated by the development, all will use: Malaga and Leach, unless a uecond access to the site is pr- Aded on Wells Road . If the second access to provided, only 5 or 10 percent of the total traffic will use It since it does not matte a good connection with either shopping, employment, or the San Diego Freeway. The total trips generated by the development were addNd to the Malaga, Stark, and Beach existing volumes to determine future traffic volumes. It was assuawd no diversion would occur to Wells Road. See Tables I and 2 for the future volumes. O F C66 1N LON AN04LA0V•ANO Co%&NQ* COU►JYMN •: w. � � page 2 Street jgad i-e=s The capacity of one through lane is about 1600 vehicles per hour, and the capacity of either a right turn or left turn lane is about 1300 vehicles pur hour. These capacities assume continuous operation. When a signal is installed, operation is allowed only when the signal is green. i To dHtermine if adequate, street capacity exists to accomodate the traffic, Malaga has been examined just north of Starlc; Stark has been examined mid- block between Malaga and Beach; and the intersection of Beach and Stark has ; been examined. The futur,- volume on Malaga north of Stark will be heaviest in the PM peak hour at 155 northbound vehicles. This is well below the Capacity of this one lane in each direction road. If the capacity is assumed to be 1600 vehicles per hour, then it operates at only 10 percent of capacity. The future volume on Stark will also be heaviest in the R: peak hour at 30; eastbound vehicles. This roadway has two lanes in each direction with f a capacity of 320 vehicles per hour in either direction. This road operates also at 10 percent of capacity. The most critical location for capacity will be at the signalized inter- section of Beach and Stark. The +signal operates by first giving north/ south through traffic a green light, then giving north/south left turns a green light, and then giving east/west traffic a green light. Of the northbound and southbound through traffic, the highest volume is southbound traffic in the PM peak hour. at 2105 vehicles. The north/south I through capacity is 4800 vehicles per hour of green for either directicn of travel. The 2105 vehicles per hour will require the north/south through green light to be on 44 percent of the time. Of the northbound and southbound left turns, the: highest volume is south- bound lefts in the PM peak hour at 200 vehicles. The capacity of this movement is 1300 vehicles per hour of green and the light will need to be green 15 percent of the time to accomodate this left turn movement. Of the eastbound and westbound traffic, the highest volume is westbound traffic in the PM peak hour at 190 vehicles per hour. Of these 190 vehi- cles, moat go right, aome go left, and a few go through. About 120 go right and- since right turn on reel is allowed, only about 90 will actually need a green light. The capacity of the right turn lane is 1300 vehicles per hour and the light will need to be green 7 percent of the time to serve this movement. By adding the 44, 15, and 7 percents together, it is seett that a green light is needed comewhere: 66 percent of the time. The remaining 34 percent of, the time is extra. Thus the intersection is operating at only 66 per- cent of capacity. TrSifig nde The traffic index for Malaga has been calculated for use in determining � If the structural cross section of the street can accomodate the added traffic. The traffic index is a number indicating the weight and volumes of truck traffic on a roadway for the design- period. i � age 3 The frrtrula for calculating a traffic index is as follows: traffic index = 6. 7 (EWL/1 ,000,000)0. 119 who're EW1. u equivalent wheel loads over life of pavement. , EWL = D x ((112 x F1.) 4 03 x F'i)) x L where, 1) = daily traffic (1250 vellicles) 112 percent of traffic that is 2-axle trucks ( 0.927. )4- l 2 = Axle Factor for 1-axle trucks ( 200 )* P3 = percent of traffic that is 3-axle trucks ( 0.34% )* I'3 = Axle Factor for 3-axle trucks ( 690 )f� L = life of roadway in yehrs ( 10 veers )* These values are recommended by Orange County Road Department for cal- culating traffic indexes for local residential streets. Th ' a N c index which results when the above numbers are used is 4.7. Sununary 1 . Malaga Lane and Stark Street will operate far below capacity.. 2. The Intersection of Roach Boulevard and Stark Street will operate at 66 percent of capacity after the propotied development is completed. 3. Thu traffic index for Malaga Lane will be 4.7. h. It a necond access to the site it provided or. We i Is Road, only 5 or 10 percent of the to ..I traffic from the site is likely to use it . A This access is not needed . We trust tltlq analysis will be of assistance to you in developing this project , t II' we can be of further assistance, please contact us . kespec:tfully submitted, I'1(QX% ,,I,IN - PRINGLK ANT) ASSOCIATES, INC. *�� 14 William A. Kutuman, P. E. Associaker Kngineer WAK:pp .w r Table 1 TP.AFFIC VOLUMES - MAI.AGA LANE ANID STARK STREET 1 Malaga Lane Stark Street NB S B EA WB Present Traffic 24 hour volume 530 530 2470 2470 8-9 AM volume 15 35 135 115 5-6 FM volume 65 45 215 230 �I Development Traffic 24 hour volume 720 720 720 720 8-9 AM volume 15 45 15 45 5-6 FM volume 90 55 90 55 Future Traffic 24 hour volume 1250 1250 3190 3190 8-9 AM volume 30 80 150 160 5-6 Fiji volurre '155 100 305 285 Table 2 PEAK 11011R TNTFR SECT ION APPROACH VOLUMES 13EACII BOULEVARD AND START: gTREFT Intvrsection Movement 19741i 1976-2/ Future-{� Northbound AM 1758 1935 1940 Northbound PI•t 1843 -030 2060 Southbotind A'X 839 925 925 Southbound PM 1913 2105 2105 Northhuund left AM 24 25 25 Northbound left PM 39 45 45 Southbound left AM 25 30 40 Southboutid left PM 123 140 900 Enstbuund AM 24 25 25 Eastbound PM :35 40 40 Wostbound AM 129 140 185 t Wv s thound PM 122 135 190 / / 1�474 hand count was conducted by Cal Trans in May for mid week. 2! 1976 counts were estimated 5y adding 10 percent to 1974 counts. 3/ Future counts are 1976 counts plus proposed development traffic. t