Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCE 92-17 (VARIANCE) APPEAL OF PC Denial - Hadjian, Fred - 1 IIIII /• . •DI. 91 • J- ,i' is ' , � �' aw Vlfflu • r• . • d. ••Y r: 1 Analysis : Staff recommends that the City Council uphold the Zoning Administrator ' s and the Planning Commission' s action and deny the appeal because of the reasons cited by the Zoning Administrator. The lack of internal circulation between the two drive aisles results in double loading and traffic conflicts with Pacific Coast Highway. The goals of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code Article 960, Parking includes reducing the points of ingress and egress along streets and arterials and ensuring safe traffic circulation. In addition, the southeasterly driveway does not meet the minimum 30 feet driveway width typically required by Caltrans as it is only 18 feet wide at Pacific Coast Highway. The applicant must also obtain a permit from Caltrans for the second driveway access . The 18 foot width is barely one-half (1/2) of the Caltrans requirement . Also, the actual driveable portion of the access way on the property itself is further reduced to ten (10) feet wide. Twenty feet is required for drive aisles such as this . The City' s Public Works Engineering Division recommends denial of this request because the potential for vehicle and traffic conflicts is great in this area as the drive can only accommodate one (1) car at a time for one-way travel . It is highly possible that first time visitors to the site will enter the driveway while another car is already there and then be forced to back-out onto Pacific Coast Highway. This situation results in an awkward traffic pattern which would be very confusing to a motorist unfamiliar with the site. Vehicles entering commercial sites should be able to travel to additional parking areas at the same area if a parking space is not available. The applicant' s appeal letter states that the southeasterly driveway is necessary because the trash enclosure can not be properly located on the north side of the property as previously required. The Zoning Administrator' s action on May 27, 1992 included the provision to relocate the trash enclosure to the south side of the building but prohibited vehicular access . A small concrete pathway from the trash enclosure to Pacific Coast Highway would allow the trash bin to be rolled down to the street as Rainbow Disposal requires. Another point of the appeal letter is that the addition of a parking space on the south side of the building brings the site into conformance with the number of parking spaces required by code. However, the nine (9) spaces currently provided on-site is consistent with the parking code that was in effect at the time of project approval. The tenth parking space is not necessary to bring the site into compliance and the potential conflict and hazardous circulation of the second access outweigh the benefits of gaining one (1) parking space. RCA 1/19/93 -4- (5397d) There is a feasible alternative to the driveway access on Pacific Coast Highway that the property owner could pursue which would comply with code. An on-site access easement between the property to the southeast, a motel, and the office building driveway would allow access to the tenth parking space while reducing traffic conflicts on Pacific Coast Highway. This would achieve the applicant ' s goal as well as comply with City' s circulation and driveway standards. The adjacent lot contains a drive aisle that terminates at the southeasterly property line. No driveway would be necessary off Pacific Coast Highway and the majority of landscaping area would be preserved. Summary: In conclusion, staff recommends denial of the appeal because: 1. There is a lack of on-site circulation; 2 . It will create potential ingress and egress conflicts on an arterial highway; 3 . The driveway width is only 18 feet in width (27 ' minimum is required by the city) which is not wide enough to accommodate adequate maneuverability into and out from the site; 4 . The on-site drive aisle is substandard (10 ' in lieu of 20' ) ; 5 . It will result in a loss of on-site landscaping and open space area pursuant to a previously approved use permit which justified a variance in conjunction with the use permit; and 6 . There is a design option available to the applicant which is to access the southerly portion of the site from an adjoining lot that contains a drive aisle terminating at the common property line. Alternative Action: Should the City Council overturn the Planning Commission' s action and approve Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-17, staff suggests a condition of approval to minimize potential traffic impacts . Staff recommends that the applicant designate the southeasterly drive as a private accessway and install a mechanized security gate across the driveway. The gate should be setback approximately eighteen (18) feet from the curbline so that it is visible from Pacific Coast Highway but allows a vehicle to wait while the gate opens . In addition, a sign shall be installed at the front of the property to identify the driveway as "Private-No Entry" . This option should help reduce traffic conflicts by preventing traffic other than authorized vehicles from entering the drive aisle. It is recommended that the gate be a rolling wrought iron structure approximately forty-two (42") inches high and painted white to match the building trim. It should be noted that ultimate approval of this driveway approach is subject to Caltrans approval because it is along Pacific Coast Highway. RCA 1/19/93 -5- (5397d) Environmental Status : This project is categorically exempt pursuant to the CEQA. FUNDING SOURCE: Not Applicable. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The City Council may overturn the Planning Commission' s action on December 1, 1992 by approving Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-17 with findings and conditions of approval (see Attachment No. 5) . ATTACHMENTS: 1. Area Map 2 . Findings for Denial 3 . Letter of Appeal dated December 9 , 1992 4 . Planning Commission Staff Report dated December 1, 1992 5. Alternative Findings and Conditions of Approval . MTU:MA:JM: lp RCA 1/19/93 -6- (5397d) T y f+ C I '... JP C r1'lrC �OF� �, •k,��•K �°qC. � `���+ , �.P°�m°yam .. r Nri 3Y + P �I PACIFIC OCEAN \ - SC.LLE IN FEET CE 92-17 HUNTINGMN BEACH HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION ATTACHMENT NO. 2 FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 92-17: 1. Since the subject property can be fully developed within regular established setbacks, such a conditional exception for an additional driveway along Pacific Coast Highway for the existing office building and with no on-site internal circulation is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights . The renovation of the existing commercial building, approved under Use Permit No. 90-18 and Conditional Exception No. 90-19, complied with the parking requirements based on the code at that time. The additional driveway, has the potential to create additional vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian conflicts along Pacific Coast Highway. The additional parking space does not warrant the conflicts between vehicles entering and exiting the site, and reduction in landscaping . In addition, there is a design option available to the applicant which is to access the southerly portion of the site from an adjoining lot. 2 . Granting of Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-17 for an additional driveway along Pacific Coast Highway for the existing office building and with no on-site, internal circulation between the two parking areas would constitute a special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon properties in the vicinity. Other parcels along Pacific Coast Highway in the vicinity have only one point of ingress and egress (driveway) . 3 . Exceptional circumstances do not apply that deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the same zone classifications. 4 . Although the property is irregular in configuration, the proposed driveway access on the southerly property line will create a hazardous situation with vehicular ingress and egress and northbound traffic on Pacific Coast Highway. 5 . The proposed driveway would create awkward circulation movements on-site and cause potential ingress and egress conflicts on an arterial highway. The driveway width is only 18 feet in width (27 ' minimum is required by the city) which is not wide enough to accommodate adequate two-way maneuvering into and out from the site. 6 . The driveway will result in a loss of on-site landscaping and open space area pursuant a previously approved use permit which justified a variance for reduced planter width (1' 6" in lieu of 10 ' ) along Pacific Coast Highway next to the northerly parking area. (5397d-7) Fred Hadjian 16182 Pacific Coast Hwy. Huntington Beach, Ca . 92648 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, Ca . 92648 C-' a Attn-. Honorable Mayor and City Council z m t, rnc2rnrrrm Re: Appeal of Planning Commission action one+ December 1 , 1992 , regarding Conditional -a Exception (Variance) No. 92-17 . T yy Hwy r T N Dear Honorable Mayor Winchell : By this letter, I am appealing the Planning Commission action taken on December 1 , 1992, in the above referenced matter . As background information , I am enclosing a copy of the original narrative I submitted to the Zoning Administration on May 20 , 1992 , and also the letter dated June 5 , 1992 , I submitted to the Planning Commission appealing the Zoning Administrator 's denial . As I have indicated in the attached letter , I had two driveways when I purchased the property. I decided to improve my property by renovating the interior by remodeling the bathrooms , installing new drywall , doors, ceiling and paint . The exterior was also completely renovated including new stucco, windows , awnings , and doors . I did not add square footage. In doing this work, I had to get a conditional use permit which required that I also install landscaping , redo my parking lot , remove the septic tank and connect to the City sewer system and pay the fees, dedicate seven feet of my property to the City along Pacific Coast Highway and construct curb, gutter and sidewalk and get all the permits from the City of Huntington Beach and Caltrans . I did not realize that when these plans were drawn , my driveway on the east side of my building was eliminated. This driveway has been a part of this property for over forty years , and just because I wanted to improve my property, to increase its value and make it more compatible with the surrounding area , I have lost a driveway which reduces the value of my property. I do not think that this is fair , and I believe that a property right I had when I purchased the property has been denied to me. This elimination of a driveway and a parking space reduced the value of my property. If I had not decided to improve my property, I C � 6 STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Orange I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the below entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the HUNTINGTON BEACH INDEPENDENT, a newspaper of general PUBLIC,NOTICE ENVIRONMENTAL STATES: Categorically ex- circulation, printed and published in the City of NOTICE OF PUBLIC empt pursuant to section Huntington Beach, County of Orange, HEARING APPEAL of forma Class 5 of the "-, State of PLANNING forma Environmental, Qua1- COMMISSION'S I OASTAL STATUS: This California, and that attached Notice is a true and DENIAL OF CONDITIONAL Project is located in the complete copy as was printed and published in but may be EXCEPTION gori categorically excluded from the Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley (VARIANCE) coastal development per- NO.92-17 mits pursuant to variances issues of said newspaperto wit the issue(s) of: (Second driveway that do not pertain to to a cominerclal height and that do not neg- site.) atively Impact,coastal ac- NOTICE IS HEREBY pass or view corridors, GIVEN that the Huntington from coastal development Beach City Council will perN FILEmits' hold a ublia healing in the O ' A copy of the Janus 21, 1993 Council Chamber at the Proposed request Ds on file Huntington Beach Civic m the Community Develop- Center, 2000 Main Street, merit Department; 2000 Huntington Beach, Califor- Main Street, Huntington 9 Beach, Caltforrda 92648, nia, on the date and at the for inspection by the pub- time indicated below to re- lic. A,copy of the staff re- ceive and consider the! port will be available to in- statements of all persons terested parties at City Hallj who wish to be heard rela- or the Main City Library! five to the application de- (7111,Talbert Avenue)after scribed below. January 28,1993. DATE/TIME:Monday;Feb- ALt: INTERESTED PER- ruary 1,1993,7:00 PM SONS are invited to attend APPLICATION NUMBER: said hearing and,express Conditional Exception) opinions or. submit evi- (Variance)No.92-17 dance in wnfing to the City APPLICANT/APPELLANT: Clerk for or against the ap- Fred Hadiian plicati(T as outlined above LOCATION:" 16182 Pacific or I written c o►- Coast Highway respondence'delivered to ZONE: Visitor Serving the City Clerk,at, or prior Commercial-Coastal Zone, to, the public hearing. If REQUEST: This Is an ap- thpm we any further goes peal of the Planning Com- lions please call Jane Mad- mission.'s denial of Condi- era Assistant Planner at I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the Ilonal Exception (Variance), 53i�S71. No. 92-17 which is a re- foregoing is true and correct quest to add a second Connie clerk Breckway, •driveway'access with no in- City temal circulation from Pa- Huntington Beach City cific Coast Highway to an Council, 2000 Main Street, Executed on January 21 ' 199 3 existing commercial site. Huntington Beach, CA The request includes,pro- 92648(714)536.5227. at Costa MVC lomia. viding an additional pant- Published Huntington ing space and relocation of Beach-Fountain Valle In- the existing trash enclo- sure. dependent January 21, / 1993. 013841 Signature (7 PROOF OF PUBLICATION At,61-iJyy- I��3 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 92-17 (Second driveway to a commercial site. ) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, February 1, 1993, 7: 00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-17 APPLICANT/ APPELLANT: Fred Hadjian LOCATION: 16182 Pacific Coast Highway ZONE: Visitor Serving Commercial - Coastal Zone REOUEST: This is an appeal of the Planning Commission' s denial of Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-17 which is a request to add a second driveway access with no internal circulation from Pacific Coast Highway to an existing commercial site. The request includes providing an additional parking space and relocation of the existing trash enclosure. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15305, Class 5 of the California Environmental Quality Act. COASTAL STATUS: This project is located in the Coastal Zone but may be categorically excluded from coastal development permits pursuant to Section 989 .5.3 . 13(g) , which exempts minor variances that do not pertain to height and that do not negatively impact coastal access or view corridors, from coastal development permits. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library (7111 Talbert Avenue) after January 28, 1993 . NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING (Continued) ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence in writing to the City Clerk for or against the application as outlined above or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call Jane Madera, Assistant Planner at 536-5271 . Connie Brockway, City Clerk Huntington Beach City Council 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714) 536-5227 (5469d) vvnnc WWV%,MWGY,%1JLY %.11t;FK City of Huntington Beach -Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 �,S v..4t- 1< 71-18 r C Bog' �%Al I N G A e Ave 17 / Ne b CA 92663 C A& Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach ORT Office of the City Clerk L P.O. Box 190 t Huntington Beach,CA 92648 L j1dreth t B 92663 CA ING NeW%yor 10RPDR41 Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 17 7 N c Agosta I�NG to 7 "X . A 92663 t e New' =77=7 777 Vil Y LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING • � S NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION' S DENIAL OF CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 92-17 (Second driveway to a commercial site. ) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN. that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber.,-at the .Huntington Beach Civic- Center , -260-0 Main Street Huntington Beach,, California, -on the date -and at the time'-indicated below to receiv..e._and.consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described_ below. DATE/TIME: _ Monday,. February 1, 1993, 7:00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-17 APPLICANT/ APPELLANT: Fred Hadjian LOCATION: 16182 Pacific Coast Highway ZONE: Visitor Serving Commercial - Coastal Zone REQUEST: This is an appeal of the Planning Commission' s denial of Conditional Exception (Variance), No. . 92-17 which is . a request to add a second driveway" a e ccss. with, no- internal circulation _from Pacific Coast:.Highwa`y'. to an existing. commercial site: The request. includes providing. an additional parking space_ and relocation of the existing trash enclosure. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15305, Class 5 of the California Environmental Quality Act. COASTAL STATUS: This project is located in the Coastal Zone but may be categorically excluded from coastal development permits pursuant to Section 989 .5.3 .13(g) , which exempts minor variances that do not pertain to height and that do not negatively impact coastal access or view corridors, from coastal development permits. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development .Department, 2000 Main Street,. Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public.. A _.copy of- the staff report will ,be- available, to �- interested .part.ie.s at City -Hal-1 or.-lthe �ma,in .City..Library (7111 Talbert Avenue).- after January 28, ,1993 . COV�) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING (Continued) ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence in writing to the City Clerk for or against the application as outlined above or in written correspondence delivered 'to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing.. . If there are any further questions please call Jane Madera, Assistant Planner at 536-5271.- Connie Brockway, City Clerk Huntington. Beach- City Council 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92649 (7-14) 53-6-522-7 (5469d) . 1, .. rp '•ti I �t x o '1 f t t f t t t'. i t P , x 1 jr, 1 ..a� 'l.y„.ti'�S7y •�.t:?�,.5'r'(�'fr.•I,+iJ.f�" r;Y 'i2:)'{tts,•-t4...'�. ;.f t. t.. '!'� . . � •:i, I,a,fJ �>ijt '��f�l o+`tj�"'t X•?� Y¢ H+ f•4.d,� 11 R� f t .J>��• •i% �n.fd✓!�,rt 7"^IY .1�..�•t:�� .+ 1 i . ,/+ ',•• i�'� ! { 14. t}tl f� �'fi �4/ �� iw f +�.�RF1;��f:•�u t �4i� � �• '• , i 'iy�+'K.e:,r;'�,�' y X' •1 n :1}}. 1'ytj.� y�kl ,t'�(,�;. ',;. /� t + t � +�. l �.JsF,�ri��,!I�i?"•Y,vR ';sy� ' f i t� } 'Y r�q 4i�ril,,i{ .......... � . ... .... ..��:^� t ,.x.,,. r,r+ 9, � ,r„ i•,. .. , ' Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O:Box 190 t t•�, r ti s, n JAId2! C3 r d rt r [ i Huntington Beach,CA 92648 1 1 G ma L Gray 5 Ave ��VNTINGTpy� /`1 Ne®r� CA g21Q(.1 ; r A . Q =NCOBYOB�tFo � �J 9y �FQ�,- •'o oe . . � cFcO�NTY LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING litltt,tltitlitttlittiitt+Itttl! Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk ,�' ' T- �9 _ P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 ,` ' 930-917 1 Tr �NTINGTp Pearson-- y 16010 ,Hari f�q 9264! oa=MfAYPDR4 d� IiuntinS( jQ �Ery �i. _—_= ->' �W DER_ -------- - - ---- np C ppUNTY -� - - LEGAL NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING !I,l9,,,I,1,lL�,19,11,l9,91�lI!„1,�1,9„9!l,i;91,! Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington BeachSF Office of the City Clerk - T P.O.Box 190 2` Huntington Beach,CA 92648 , i 930-90-021 . Robbi Bailor �HTINGTp 15992. Mariner Dr Huntington Beach CA 9264 =NCORPORq�o F � 9 V! Fa t 1909.s �auNTY ca LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING Connie Brockway,City Clerk _ City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk y'! .�j = P.O. Box 190 F,. ~-z.= _ 7. Huntington Beach,CA 92648 �to�930-91-0� - -- 1�� �V Verlan T S ay. f 16004r-Harin Dr INGTpy Hunting 92649 LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING T _ _ . . onnie Brockway,City Clerk s City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk ` P.O. Box 190 i y3 i intington Beach,CA 92648 sv s f � t�r�� . �1 930-90-004 David A fson TING y 15938 Mari Dr y"O d Huntington ach C.A. 92649 A Al 11 C F cpGN T Y LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING Illl lllli lillilllll11111/„11l111111111,1,111llll i,l %l NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 92-17 (Second driveway to a commercial site. ) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, February 1, 1993, 7:00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-17 APPLICANT/ APPELLANT: Fred Hadjian LOCATION: 16182 Pacific Coast Highway ZONE: Visitor Serving Commercial - Coastal Zone REOUEST: This is an appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-17 which is a request . to add a second driveway access with no internal circulation from Pacific Coast Highway to an existing commercial site. The request includes providing an additional parking space and relocation of the existing trash enclosure. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15305, Class 5 of the California Environmental Quality Act. COASTAL STATUS: This project is located in the Coastal Zone but may be categorically excluded from coastal development permits pursuant to Section 989 .5.3 . 13(g) , which exempts minor variances that do not pertain to height and that do not negatively impact coastal access or view corridors, from coastal development permits. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to �`- interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library (7111 Talbert Avenue) after January 28, 1993 . NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING (Continued) ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and -express opinions or submit evidence in writing to the City Clerk for or against the application as outlined above or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call Jane Madera, Assistant Planner at 536-5271. Connie Brockway, City Clerk Huntington Beach City Council 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (7-14) 536-5227 (5469d) I �Je te City of Huntington Beach P.O.BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92M From the desk of.. CONNIE BROCKWAY CITY CLERK i 247 930-90-018, 930-90-019 930-90-020_ Ashley J Smith Vincent Kenny 15982 Mariner Dr 15984 Mariner Dr i 1598.6 Mariner Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington each CA 92649 ;i� Huntington Beach CA 92649 0/ 04r Pam. 930-90-021 930-90-022 �'`�'fr'4 � !; 930-91-001 Robbi Ba or Hichael H Evasovic Helena L Herning 15992 riner Dr 15994 Mariner Dr 15996 Hariner Dr 1 Hunti gton Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 ;�� Huntington Beach CA 92649 9 -91- 02 930-91-003 930-91-004 Kenn P & Emilene King Verlan T iddy Wendell D Brown 15 8 riner Dr 16004 riner Dr 16006 Hariner Dr ntington Beach CA 92649 Hunt gton Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 930-91-005 930-91-00 930-91-007 Hyams Thomas E &Thomas E Tr �w Pearson orothea J Tr J Strong Harguerite 0 Tr 16008 Mariner Dr 16010 riner Dr �j 16016; Hariner Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Hunt gton Beach CA 92649 ij Huntington Beach CA 92649 ii 930-91-008 930-91-009 930-91-010 Petersen Dorothy Tr Nicolson Garth F Tr ;!I Hichael ' J Kondas 16018 Mariner Dr 16020 Mariner Dr 16022 Hariner Dr Huntington leach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 � 930-91-011 930-91-012 930-91-013 Edward F & Herilyn Simonin Bauler Arthur Tr Edwin A & Arlene Snyder 16028 Mariner Dr 16030 Hariner Dr i 16032 Hariner Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 it Huntington Beach CA 92649 ' E , .. ! • 930-91-014 930-.91-015 930 , 9.1-016 , Dale F Dowis John H Runkel Marion L Tunks 16034 Mariner Dr 16040 Mariner Dr 16042 Mariner Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 930-91-017 930-91-018 i;i 9 91- 1 Robert B & Carolyn Wells Pittman Carl D Tr i� Richa Margaret Mc Guire 16044 Mariner Dr 16046 Mariner Dr ;4� 160 ner Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 ;i� H tingt n Beach CA 92649 930-91-020 930-91-0 ji 930-91-022 Richard K Davis George Houston v Steve & Victoria Rinek 16054 Mariner Dr 16056 ariner Dr �� 16058 Mariner Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Hun ngton Beach CA 92649 i Huntington Beach CA 92649 930-91-023 ( 930-91-024 Frank L & Sandra Nunes Kert Jordan ;a 16064 Mariner Dr 16066 Mariner Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 *** 92 Printed *** �I ; • - 930-90-001 ( 0-90-- 2 Steven A & Nancy Peterman Dh perties Ltd 15932 Mariner Dr 1 15 ariner Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 ; „ ntin on Beach CA 92649 930-90-003 930-90-004 ii/ .. ... -930-9:._._.._._:........... .. � 0-005 Bruce C & Janice Kavin ! David A ustafson Virginia H Romero 15936 Mariner Dr 1593 ariner Dr 15944 Hariner Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 i H tington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 I 980-90-006 90-007 � � 9 -90 08 Robert W Hiller Jose ben Tr i, Er & Eric Bakker 15946 Mariner Dr 159 er Dr �i 15 Mariner Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 ntingto Beach CA 92649 ;I ntin on Beach CA 92649 930-90-009 ' 93 0-01 �. 930-90-011 Spencer R Alter Mark Louise Jasper Benton .Whitehead 15956 Mariner Dr 159 ner Dr i� 15960 Mariner Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 ntington Beach CA 92649 �� Huntington Beach CA 92649 930-90-012 930-90-013 j 930-90-014. John H Doran Ann R Grant Dale E Anderson 15962 Mariner Dr 15968 Mariner Dr 15970 Mariner Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 930-90-015 9 90-0 : i 930-90-017 Grosh Jack Tr Ern Siracusa Edna B Kogan 15972 Mariner Dr 159 iner Dr � i. 15980 Mariner Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 tingto Beach CA 92649 � � Huntington Beach CA 92649 i i 178-481-01 178-481-02 William C Bruton Randall L & Brenda Turnbow 16184 Surfside Ave 16186 Surfside Ave Seal Beach CA 92663 i ! Se': .each CA 92663 178-481-03 178-481-04 178-481-05 Schlange Alfred H Tr Margarite V Atukovich ; ;; Robert E- & Mary Bacon 16188 Surfside Ave 16190 Surfside Ave 16192 Surfside Ave Seal Beach CA 92663 Seal Beach CA 92663 Seal, Beach CA 92663 178-481-06 178-481-08 178-481-09 Magnotte Ru h Tr Moe Bruce V Tr Pamela' A Mac Donald 56 Surfsid Ave 16200 Surfside Ave 16202 Surfside Ave Newport B acb CA 92663 Seal Beach CA 92663 j Seal. Beach CA 92663 178-481-10 1 481- 178-481-12 Jon H Regnier Milla aurice Tr ; i William H & Victoria Sawtelle 16204 Surfside Ave 162 Sur a Ave 16208 ' Surfside Ave Seal Beach CA 92663 Se 1 Beach CA 92663 ;,' Seal. Beach CA 92663 -481-13 178-481-14 78-481-15 Mike ne Klistoff Michael J & Mary Farrell A ur o Gallucci 1621 u e Ave 16212 Surfside Ave B-47 'i 46 fic :Ave S Beach CA 92663 Seal Beach CA 92663 ii al Beac CA 92718 i .. 178-471-1 178-471-�CBo Nolan W ramer Virgini ggs 73 Su side Ave 72 Sur side Ave Newp rt Beach CA 92663 ,:� i Newp t Beach CA 92663 178-X1- 178-471-21 I178-471-22 , Nickryn Agosta Sam R & G eta KennedyElizabet H Erskine 71 S Ave 67 Surf de Ave 66 Sur ide Ave Newpch CA 92663 Newpo Beach CA 92663 i ! Newpo t Beach CA 92663 178-X1-23 178-471-2 ;� 8-471-BradHildreth Anna M tukovic i Jo Artukovich 65 S Ct B 16178 urfside Ave � ; 16 2 rfside Ave Newpch CA 92663 Seal each CA 92663 ii al Beac CA 92663 178-481- 1� 178 81-3 i ' . 178-481-34 Joseph Margaret Rullo Mich & Ramona Matting,l,e,y Alex Meruelo 16271 Surfside Ave 49 S s e Ave r 16207 Surfside Ave Sea Beach CA 92663 New . rt Be CA 92663 ;i ;: Seal Beach CA 90743 178-481-35 178-481-36 178-481-37 Donald M rown Donald G Anderson ,':! Hampton F Tedder 16205 Su fside Ave 1.6203 Surfside Ave 16201 Surfside Ave Seal B ch CA 92663 Seal Beach CA �2��3 �' '; � � '. Seal Beach CA 90743 17 481- 178-481-39 �;' /.ort 0 V L y Est Of The a L Gray " ' C Bird 161 S ide Ave 55 Surfs a Ave de S 1 Beach CA 92663 Newpor Beach CA g2�43ii each CA 92663 i 178-48/Galegui 178-481-42 �I 178-481-44 Eugene Murrey & Sue Seidner � '. Youngsma Peter 0 Tr 57 SurAve 16191 Surfside Ave �il 16187 Surfside Ave Newporh CA 92663 Seal Beach CA 92663 j Seal Beach CA 92663 .. Robert Herron Roger & Jo a Kuppinger Robert J & Rebecca Kendrick •68 Sur side Ave 67 Surfsi a Ct 16179 Surfside Ave Newpo t Beach CA 92663 Newport each CA 92663 Seal Beach CA 92663 178-47 -20 178-472-2 ; i� 178-472-22 _ Will m S & Dorothy Davila Br unn J n P Tr i WIA-lia P Uniack 63 rfside Ave 62 Sur side Ave 61 S fside Ave N port Beach CA 92663d Newpo t Beach CA 92663 ij N70ort .Beach CA 92663 178-472-3 Robert & Marilyn Quaid 69 Sur side Ave Newpo t Beach CA 92663 E 178-581-01 Point Mariner' s !; 15922 Coast Hwy Huntington Beach CA 92651 178-581-12 178-581-15 178-581-16 Babubhai G Patel Vallabhbhai K Patel Fred Hadjian 16220 Coast Hwy 16196 Coast Hwy ) 16182 Coast Hwy Huntington Beach CA 92651 Huntington Beach CA 92651 Huntington Beach CA 92651 178-581-18.019 Odis Bozarth 16214 Coast Hwy Huntington Beach CA 92651 t f 1 1 PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST MAILING LABELS (5480d) 1/4/93 President William D. Holman 930-90-07 H.B. Chamber of Commerce Pacific Coast Homes Joseph, Rueben TR 2213 Main St. #32 2124 Main St. 10207 Babbitt Ave.. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Hunt. Bch., CA 92648-2499 Northridge, CA 91325 Board President Pres., H.B. Hist. Society 930-900-10 H.B./F.V. Board of Realtors C/O Newland House Museum ; Jasper, Mark F. 8101 Slater Ave. 19820 Beach Blvd. 1711 Camino Primavera Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Bakersfield, CA 93306 i 930-900-08 Chairperson 930-900-02 Eric A. Baker TR Historical Resources Bd. iDHT Properties, LTD. 16441 S. Pacific Ave. Comm. Services Dept. C/O California Federal Bank Sunset Beach, CA 90742 2000 Main St. P. D. Box 60093 Huntington Beach,- CA 92648 City of Industry, CA 91899 930-900-16 930-910-02 930-910-19 Ernest V. Siracusa, Jr. King, Kenneth P.. McGuire, Ri,chard- P. 0. Box 17267 19396 Woodlands Lane P. 0. Box 131 Irvine, CA 92713 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Sunset Beach, CA 90742 Edna Littlebury 178-481-11 178-481-13 Golden St. Mob. Hm. Owners Leag. Millard, Maurice, TR Mike Klistoff 11021 Magnolia Blvd. 4312 Beeman Ave. 10243 Les.terford Ave. Garden Grove, CA 92642 Studio City, CA 91604 Downey, CA 90241 178-481-38 178-481-33 178-481-43/178-471-25 V.L. Denny Michael B. Mattingley John M. Artukovich P. 0. Box 179 A-49 Surfside Ave. P. 0. Box 195 Surfside, CA 90743 Surfside, CA 90743 Surfside, CA 90743 Joan "JP" Peoples 178-481-15 16184 Mariner Drive Arthur & Jo Galucci Huntington Beach, CA 92649 B-46 Surfside, CA 90743 I YUBLIL HLAKING NUTIFICATIUN'CHECKLI51 - MAILING LABELS ` (5480d) 1/4/93 14 President William D. Holman �930-90-07 H.B. Chamber of Commerce Pacific Coast Homes Joseph, Rueben TR 2213 Main St. #32 2124 Main St. 10207 Babbitt Ave. . Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Hunt. Bch.-, CA-92648-2499 Northridge, CA 91325 Board President V�Pres., H.B. Hist. Society f930-900-10 H.B./F.V. Board of Realtors C/O Newland House Museum Jasper, Mark F. 8101 Slater Ave. 19820 Beach Blvd. 1711 Camino Primavera Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Bakersfield, CA 93306 6/ 930-900-08 Chairperson 1 930-900-02 Eric A. Baker TR Historical Resources Bd. i DHT Properties, LTD. 16441 S. Pacific Ave. Comm. Services Dept. C/O California Federal Bank Sunset Beach, CA 90742 2000 Main St. P. 0. Box 60093 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 City of Industry, CA 91899 930-900-16 930-910-02 �930-910-19 Ernest V. Siracusa, Jr. King, Kenneth P.. McGuire, Richard P. 0. Box 17267 19396 Woodlands Lane P. 0. Box 131 Irvine, CA 92713 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Sunset Beach, CA 90742 Edna Littlebury 178-481-11 1 78-481-13 Golden St. Mob. Hm. Owners Leag. Millard, Maurice, TR Mike Klistoff 11021 Magnolia Blvd. 4312 Beeman Ave. 10243 Lesterford Ave. Garden Grove, CA 92642 Studio City, CA 91604 Downey, CA 90241 V178-481-38 �178-481-33 �178-481-43/178-471-25 V.L. Denny Michael B. Mattingley John M. Artukovich P. 0. Box 179 A-49 Surfside Ave. P. 0. Box 195 Surfside, CA 90743 Surfside, CA 90743 Surfside, CA 90743 V Joan "JP" Peoples 178-481-15 16184 Mariner Drive Arthur & Jo Galucci Huntington Beach, CA 92649 B-46 Surfsido, CA 90743 COVER SHEET MAT" CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARINGS N/A YES N_Q ( ) (" Did Wang type ou City Council or Planning Commission public hearing n co? If appeal, a appellant and applicant shown on legal notice? (✓) ( ) ( ) h in is involved, is "legal challenge paragraph" nclud (9 ( ) ( ) If Coastal Development Permit, are the RESIDENT labels attached and is the Coastal Commission Office on the labels. ( ) (v) ( ) Were latest Assessor's Parcel Rolls used? Is the appellant's name and address part of the labels? (�) $�day f public hearing correct — Monday/Tuesday? // ( ) Has the City Administrator's Office authorized the public hearing to be set? M (" � is PC Matrix mailing list required? For Public Hearings at the City Council level please revise the last paragraph of the public hearing notice as follows: ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit to the City Clerk, written evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If there are any further questions please call (insert name of Planner) at 536-5227. CONNIE BROCKWAY,CITY CLERK CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 (714) 536-5227 The paragraph which is currently on Coastal Commission_public hearings should remain. 0019z NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION' S DENIAL OF CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 92-17 (Second driveway to a commercial site. ) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, February 1, 1993, 7:00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-17 APPLICANT/ APPELLANT: Fred Hadjian LOCATION: 16182 Pacific Coast Highway ZONE: Visitor Serving Commercial - Coastal Zone REOUEST: This is an appeal of the Planning Commission' s denial of Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-17 which is a request to add a second driveway access with no internal circulation from Pacific Coast Highway to an existing commercial site. The request includes providing an additional parking space and relocation of the existing trash enclosure. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15305, Class 5 of the California Environmental Quality Act . COASTAL STATUS: This project is located in the Coastal Zone but may be categorically excluded from coastal development permits pursuant to Section 989 . 5 .3 . 13(g) , which exempts minor variances that do not pertain to height and that do not negatively impact coastal access or view corridors, from coastal development permits . ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library (7111 Talbert Avenue) after January 28, 1993 . NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING (Continued) ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence in writing to the City Clerk for or against the application as outlined above or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing . If there are any further questions please call Jane Madera, Assistant Planner at 536-5271. Connie Brockway, City Clerk Huntington Beach City Council 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714) 536-5227 (5469d) , l Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach D `'`�'t'' Office of the City Clerk !'� ty „1 �;s � P.O. Box 190 ,� /P JAN 21 f 3 CA 92648 €Huntington Beach, F�p ? , �IVDE* -9%01 0 s rowne l l TINGT FA 1 8 4 riner �Dr Oyu Hunk-ifigton Beach CA 92649 . ;'to P POB41�� �9 vl 1 1919•FO O` cF00U 14 NTY cP`�� ' � q�t of LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING I loll IfI III I III IIIIIIIII11171III{{IIII{1111I{IIIIIII W. wd r 1 t 1 Jf 4 1 1� t r p t 1t way,City Clerk ington Beach - e City Clerk } Zox 190 - 3ach, CA 92648 v 1 �8- 81 IGTpy� �•/�\ ,41 92663 7Ngf O 0.J f Pij r Y ca LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ckway,City Clerk mtington Beach the City Clerk y '° / • J'E3 Box 190 Beach,CA 92648 J,; lgPOgllfG 92663 IN % LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING )ckway,City Clerk intington Beach f the City Clerk �. Box 190 - ;— Beach, CA 92648 - - N54 TING TpP1 d� e 'JRPORRrl, '1�3�i r C A 92663 New • . •I 1909.E \�0 vTY cap LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING -"- ;kway,City Clerk ntington Beach _ the City.'Clerk Box 190 .,PT Beach,.:CA 92648 3 1 L I: CJJI s T ~`'"Dorothy "Davila ve f INGT ' Oyu ( CA 92663 ,RPORRrEo F'� \�\ �y�yQQ OQ` IV T LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING Away,City Clerk - ntington Beach the City Clerk Box 190 �, r ;' �r.•L J } _ Beach,CA 92648 �l 1 17 Fr \ Sa e} Kennedy iING 674, Newp ,�f 92663 gvogqrE f� .40 " s ��TY ca LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING :i ,ckway,City Clerk rntington Beach City }" ESCRT / 6 the Clerk _' ' ,� v .!: u. �•aG `�-� Box 190 �'a J�ti 2' 3 =�° ^ : 1 A Beach,CA 92648 Y!R.� 1 C$ '1 s-t+�� , "I , �= ;� ;z Y LM9ea�I yff! °g uPPinger i INGTpy u t AVOR4rfG New �y CA 92663 _ rsr '1 T Y LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING e Brockway,City Clerk of Huntington Beach ice of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 _ ,f !gton Beach, CA 92648 TING Tpy11 j ack '%CORP0R4r Q _ _F `�9Z a Ne 92663 `FB 77•tees.�� cp�NTY LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING :kway,City Clerk ntington Beach r R 12 the City Clerk Box 190 a L^ .>. .. � - y � �� 1t_ Beach,CA.92648 r �. . i L�i i � ,., ::.F a k = , /� c Robt i 69"SJ&f yn Quaid NeNport908e dA tiNGZZ T 92663 - o 7Z teas•` � NTY Ca LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING _ �ockway,City Clerk iuntington Beach of the City Clerk O. Box 190 _ - n Beach, CA 92648 _ 41 E S alegui ATINGTpyd GAS hvCA 92663 MLORPORK rEC Pig �w 9/), 1909•F 0NTY ca LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ockway,City Clerk untington Beach ` -- _ __-- -- f ty J Y to 1+S Y �: .i:1.:� cC-`.. �-;~.:'=` the Ci Clerk b'J,��. �?' ' I Box 190 2! S3 i Beach,CA 92648 ' ' ' fl 1 0. � ij a l .La l`'-02 .. - ��— P --Tr i �� Ave TINGTp?, N p CA 92663 :ORPORR7f ��A �� Q 'NTY ca` LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ,., III :kway,City Clerk ;! :ntington Beach the City Clerk 3 �► - Box 190 1 .. Beach,CA 92648 r TE Rut •r �g�� e Av�� y r.each CA 92663 P�f 1- 1TINGTpy {� 41 _ -- �(,00.roNq IFO �F v rCQ o.. TIP i 9ry ATY �a LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ,I( Ickway,City Clerk intington Beach the City Clerk ' )3T- -CA). _BOX 190 21 Beach,-CA.92648 St MLASS ;� A!1'. - � ""--_tF- F\ 'Ii•'~•` , ca.E~2 . 39 2 0 Gu' d i 56 S s :TINGTpy l!� Newpb � CA 92663 ;0RVOR41F �i ► ' �i0 lwplw-� NC o Q I1, 1909•F \ LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING Clerk sl sockway,City 1 Huntington Beach of the City Clerk _ } P.O.Box 190 Eton Beach,CA 92648 —51 ;c 22;� sL1�. abeth e`r�c'v 92663 �� ye4t urfsid \ 9d�r wport $each ,tt__��NSINGTpy� V` \�OORPO1101 q.ITFU F,9 e y� FFH 17 1909'O F�ouNTv cam LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING - . . Brockway,City Clerk v. )f Huntington Beach o -e of the City Clerk F F.��U � P.O. Box 190 x�q,A+i� s '� J1"2! "S3 3ton Beach,CA 92648 = o t� " X — Y CAL I i:n»oo-=a• a `1 7 rron s r Ave - Q A '92663 ANT I NGTp�, =MCOq POq�7FG �iA - r�� �p�NTI Ca LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 178-471--19 178-481-39 Nick Agosta Charles R. Currey B-71 18516 - 1st . Street . PO Box 355 Suite 800 Surfside, CA 90743 Santa Ana CA 92705 178-471-23 178-471-18 Hildreth Bradrick Virginia C Boggs 65 Surfside Ct B PO Box 787 Surfside, CA 90743 Bellflower CA 90706 178-471-22 178-481-32 Elizabeth H. Erskine Joseph & Margaret Rullo 2667 Derby 48-A Surfside Berkeley CA 94705 Seal Beach CA 90743 178-481-35 178-481-40 Donald M. Brown Gustavus C Bird PO Box 441 A-56 Surside CA 90743 Surfside CA 90743 178-481-41 Eugene G. Salegui A-57 Surfside Ave. Surfside eA 90743 178-471-17 Nolan W. Cramer PO Box 475-B-73 Surfside CA 90743 i 178-471-21 San R & Greta Dennedy PO Box 394 Surfside CA 90743 178-471-24 Anna M Artukovic PO Box 192 Surfside CA 90743 930-90-019 178-472-20 Niid-Exchange,!' II William and Dorothy Davila 501 Parkcenter P.O. Box 261 Santa Ana, CA 92101 Surfside, CA 90743 930-910-03 178-472-30 Swingle, Richard, et al Robert and Marilyn Quaid 10�-3?- St. Bernard 10521 Easterhill Dr. Cypress, CA 90630 Santa Ana, CA 92705 930-910-13 �0' t/18 147'd 118 n Edwin Snyder �nd�gy�e.�Ci��eh 5375 Avenida Encinas A Carlsbad, CA 92009 930-910-21 178-472-21 George C. Houston Brunn John p Tr 1�00 Wilcox Ave P.O.Box 236 Monterey Park, CA 91754 Surfside, Ca 90743 930-910-23 Frank and Sanfdra Nunes 178-472-19 P.O. Box 174 Robert and Rebecca Kendrick Midway City, CA 92655 A-64 Surfside, CA 90743 930-900-15 Grosh Jack Tr 178-472-22 2117 Sunnybank William Uniack LA Canada, CA 91011 P.O. Box 188 Surfside, CA 90743 930-900-13 Ann R Grant 9844 S Paramount Blvd. Downey, CA 90241 178-481-06 Ruth Magnotte Tr B-56, P.O. Box 203 Surfside, CA 90743 178-47c-17 Robert J Herron P.O. Box 258 Surfside, CA 90743 ._fZ'onNie Brockway, City Clerk ... ........ City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 F a 17 �vz 1i Huntington Beach, CA 92648 930-9 6 -i Edna- B ING 15980 Mariner Dr- -h ,,CUR PC Huntington Beach CA .49 C-0 C= LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING till] REr 930-9o-021 C Rc)bbi Bailor Zer. . SND;7iR ING E 15992 Mariner Dr Huntington 92649� Beach CA � ;z(p LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 930-91-006 Pearson Dorothea J Tr W-- 'omr& -- — 16010 Mariner Dr 92649 Huntington Beach CA 6 P� LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING Connie Brockway,City Clerk 4 i_,rCity'bf Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk '' _ _ %`✓ _ P.O. Box190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 t s' �• « r {ice ` I% _5 '� __ " 178-471-23 . G t_= w:.;-_ _ 'Hildreth Bradrick N NGTpy 65-B;Surfside M�RRPORgIFO Surfside CA 90743 — - ._.. -i��'�NZLi3Y829>3'?43�t?�3 � �'•:__.-.... FL7RWARDItVGIMEHIVEXPIRE47 - � HIL CF a 17,1909 �c�o �99 td IJI�HTMANs ST - - cppNTY -- LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING � 1' Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk F - P.O. Box 190 .; r ' �.� Huntington Beach, CA 92648 930-90-004 p ` David A Gustafson 15938 Mariner Dr ANT I N G Tp wA�t) r Huntington Beach CA 92649 �Y�a ~��UN T Y �?`\\�✓✓ LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING r r ; s� •a � ? �' � r 1 Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk '�► +` j ;s P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach,CA 926Q gn! �a.A 7AS0A1 Cld . N/�CKEt) hsuff;" r.N;�t R,► 178-481-03 Na s 't''P„ k; / Addr ^ Schlange Alfred H Tr /yd a��h street cb,,,t r orrice ^ `�--, 16188 Surfside Ave NT I NGTpyd Seal Beach CA 9 663 OR P044 V � C/ FFd ll 19U9.�� (O �puNTY cp LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING _ �}s �-{ ryS" rVt—� N:1 .S�ll t!lll:li�t:itiri n!?� � _. 1� �'v.',.....'�..,y..a...v . .: .. , Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk -��; 771 �T P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 1 78-481-04 - ite V Atukovich Mar ar I i 16 90 Surfside Ave `i o' 1�:, Beach CA 2663 ING p0(/N TY CP�� LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 11tll Ill t Ili 1111111till lt till Id tti t. Connie Brockway, City Clerk ��- - -- -�-�->� City of Huntington Beach z�\N BF � is.:,.pus'AGE jPSOR G"-- Office of the City Clerk "E ° i P.O. Box 190 FE826 53 T. '� S5 MAID Huntington Beach, CA 9264f3 ' ..�..�..-T CAl.lf. r,�392 s1Pat•a`T�, Sa�•�H ��'t�F �.t?r•r• c,1 :� sy,�.��_?�`;.'• a � i•: ,fw 'r 1� TING - 178-481-04 �. oAP�A, MARGARITE V T � r- �� 16190 SURF I DE AV ° s oER NEWPORT CH CA ---- Q SUCH STREET SUCk 1y 19o9'�tis� ` CA LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 1 it Connie Brockway,City Clerk """'" '"." 'a""'► """° • " ECAW. , nGCity of Huntington Beach r [�T4LUS.POSI Office of the Cot Clerk FE8PRd �;)R1 (.,3P.O. Box 190Huntington Beach,CA 92648 .... . . '•-)4�1•a"t Ft F+.l•�4+. �`t^tF1 �•2?�•u c�1 ".; '�zi�:.?f 5'3 r_ Nrn z 0 jj8 481-03rn xl �• SCHLA 'AL•F;F D H. TR ��NZINGTpy� ! 16'188 StJ .51,D� E, ca \NGO..... ��, �9� WPOR•—BE F�.r C� �192663 14 rX FAT �. _.. . -�� - HUNfINGTON iMRINP. 16101 mariner drive•huntington beach, calif ornia 91649 March 1 , 1993 TO: City Council Members Council Chamber - City Hall 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Conditional Exception (Variance) No . 92-17 On behalf of . 92 Homeowners here, I urge the Council to deny this appeal by our neighbor, Fred Hadjian, who is requesting permission to add a second driveway access to his property. Our main concern is that he has failed to comply with the City 's original requirements for his occupancy permit. His apparent disregard of these requirements continues to contri- bute to hazardous driving conditions experienced by most of our residents as they enter or leave Pacific Coast Highway each day by way of our driveway . The most obvious requirement was to have the Utility Pole set back several feet . The wall between our property was also to be removed back several feet . He was to install curbs , gutters , and landscaping , none of which has ever been done. The Utility Pole is directly in line of vision when leaving our property . Its removal would greatly increase visability. Curbs and gutters would allow space for a right-turn lane for northbound traffic to enter our driveway in a more safe manner. Allowing Mr. Hadjian to add the use of a second driveway will only increase hazards already in place. His first driveway should be constructed in a safe manner before allowing him to proceed with another ! YOUR DENIAL OF THIS APPEAL will be greatly appreciated ! Sincerely , oan "JP" Peoples President cc : Officers & Board Members ICITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 N OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CONNIE BROCKWAY CITY CLERK March 3, 1992 Fred Hadjian 16182 Pacific Coast Highway Huntington Beach, California 92648 Dear Mr. Hadjian: The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held March 1, 1992, denied your appeal regarding Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-17, for a second driveway access at a commercial site. This is a final decision. You are hereby notified that pursuant to provisions of Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedures of the State of California you have ninety days from March 3, 1993, to apply to the courts for judicial review. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office at 536-5227. Sincerely yours, Z�� 45'ocnl� Connie Brockway, CMC City Clerk CB:mj CC: City Administrator City Attorney Community Development Director i 1051K (Telephone: 714.536.5227) § 1094.5 SVFClAL PROCEEDINGS Part s Note 378 n.nnlnl fnr iww trial -if- rim••, 1'rr.rn.l .. mine.► r.nn.. :•::imn•r hnd 1.,, juri,.diviicul l•alifurnin 1'n.tnldo)nu•l:t 11w. Appe:.11i 11.1. nm1 dicl not .1.•Irrnihit,mvritr. \\'rAtrn:Air tI97,11) 1:.7 i'al.npir. .'.tit• ',i ('.A.311 :.'!). I.hiex I:.c•, c•• Sol.ir.ki (111til) 11-1 Cnl.lipir. *rrlal court'x jmign:.•ut .hu.inc writ ,.f 11f1, till rnnmintc to compel dirrc•tor ..f algrirultnro {hu•t that letirr :lixchArFini; xcnior ivY• In act oxide ht.. IleviRimi n•c•nking prthinn• 1xt rI.-rk in offive of rmnllc clerk xtotcd rr'Y livenxe as nirc•raft l.ih.t iu 1,o<I11t'xx ..I dolt xhe N::x cudly of mi...•undurt in re- prat runlrol wax revrrxed uud enxn re movinc puhlie record- from thn files an.l -' - nlnttdrd In Trial r•.nrt with .tir.rrtiunx In mnlilating rind xrrreiii,r il.tin on vnrions :.; remand mixu In din•rior fur purl.o'e 1•f clatex, wherenx in hearing before cousily i rrvronxiderlug the hranity previously im• civil xrn•ive cotsunixxiun rvidrvive wan in; nied, where it was found !brit some of trn:lucrd only na to nhnt took plots on thu charges ngninxt. petitionrr were not mitt of il:r dater. Ilid tint require the. Ilia• - xuppotted by cvuirnce. Wingfirld . v. t rirt raart ..f alqMnl nn al•I:.nl frnnl judg- _,i Diroetor of Agriculture (11172) 1W Col. mend nanrdiui; xraior tipi.t clerk writ of l:l►tt•.019,2DC.A.31l200. mandate, after roveralne il:o )udgmeut of 1.'roccediug for review of dviiinl by rout- the xuperior ,hurt, rn rcmatid the mutter -�"--miisloner tit rorpmrnllonx of permit to to the c•.•nunitojun for re.•onxideration, cbnnge voliog rightx of xhnrrbnhlrrx whi•rn then anx it xiulilnrit� of fart, our• would he reinnndrd to xuperior court for rcnmdiug rrnu.val of the .l.K•umenlY un all dctenni intinn whether there wria auhxtnn.' of the clnirx. t'ralt %-. Lo.; Angelrx C-oun- ."_tint: evidence to xupport 1..lLIIIIYaiU11l`r'Y ty Civil Service. I'omtniYYiuu f1952) 2:W fiudlasa, where court improperly deter- 1'Ud 3. 1(ly C.A_d 114. -§ -1094.6. Judicial review; decisions of local agencies; petition; filing; time; record; decision and Marty defined; or- dinance or resolution (a) Judicial review of any decision of a local agency. other than school district, as the term local agency is defined in Section 54951 of the Government Code, or of any commission, board, officer or agent tht.^eof, may be had pursuant to Section 1094.5 of this code only if the petition for writ:of mandate pursunnt to such section is filed -,:'ithin the time limits specified in this section. (b) Any such Petition shall be filed nut later than the 90th day following the date on which the decision becomes final.- If there is no provision for reconsideration of the decision in any applicable provi- sion of any statute, charter, or rule, for the purposes of this section, the decisi,`r1 is final on the date it is made. If there is such provision for reconsideration, the decision is final for the purposes of this sec- tion upon the expiration of the period during which such reconsidera- tion can be sought; provided, that if reconsideration is sutlg'ht pursu- af,t to any such provision the decision is final for the purposes of this section on the date that reconsideration is rejected. (c) The complety record of the lirm-cI•dings shall N. I1rep ircd by tilt! I(X..tl il;;rlu'y or it; volnitlis,:inn, ho:lyd, officer, or s1�4onl whil-h made the decision ;)nd shall Ix• dolivercli to the poitionk r within 90 !toys iirtcr he has filed n •.Written reljuest lhc;-efur. The lcical nbenc•y may recover from the petitioner its actual costs for t i pmScribing or otherwise preparing the record. Such record shall incluee the tran- Sc7ipi of the proceedings, all p1c.ndings, all notices :and 1:rders, any proposed decision by a healing officer, the final decisions, ail admitted 674 1 I Title 1 WRIT OF MANDATE § 1094.6 exhibits, all rejected exhibits in the possession of the local agency or its commissiun, board, officer, or agent, all written evidence; and any other papers in the case. (d) if the petitioner files a relluesl for ilic record ae specified in culkliviNion (c) within 10 days af(cr the date the decision becomes Ci- nal a% provided in subdivision (b), flit' time within which a petition pursuant to Section 109•1.5 inny he filed shall he extended to not later than the 30th day following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the petitioner or his attorney of rec- - `rordr if he has one. "(e) As used in this section, decision means adjudicatory admin- istrative decision made, after hearing, suspending, demoting, or dis- !--fiii-sing an officer or employee, revoking or denying an applicationfor-,a permit or a license, or denying an application for any retire- ment benefit or allowance. (f): In making a final decision as defined in subdivision (e), the local agency shall provide notice to the party that the time within I which judicial review must be sought is governed by this section. As used in this subdivision, "party" means an officer or em- ployee who has been suspended, demoted or dismissed; a person whose permit or license has been revoked or whose application for a permit or license has been denied; or a person whose application for a retirement benefit or allowance has been denied. (g) This section shall be applicable in a local agency only if the governing board thereof adopts an ordinance or resolution making this section applicable. If such ordinance or resolution is adopted, the provisions of this section shall prevail over any conflicting provision in any otherwise applicable law relating to the subject matter. (Added by Stats.197G, c. 276, p.581, § 1.) Forms See Wtst'M Valiforuitt Code Forms, Civil Procedure. Library References Admiuirtrntit•e Law will i'rovelhw• C.J.S. Public Arlminixtrative DoJien anti C-7_"3. Procc,lttrc 1 193. Notes of Decisions In general I flint Inthlir cmidn ment rehttionx Lune,( Exhaustion of administrative remedies 2 lout wwhi.it•u juriodirtictt to dvicrmine tthrth,•r the unfair liructice t•har ux W-cre Inetili, I; nod, in view of trarhern' failure to r•chnns: tl:rir n,ln;i::i tirc rrinc(iics 1, In general uid,-r il-r Itn.I.Ia Act. trial court erred in \rhnid I loll rd'r )milnt.•-nl f•r,•ri::;; of ;;r:m1iti; w'ril of m;lIV1:;t: 1,0 rOtnhel r,;l,er- t,•a,•h,-r.' wtlnri,•s nft,•r I­t;innii,v of r,cw intewlent or ,l'os,ri,-t w"I otLrrq to ruisr r,hunl �-rnr, %0ii1r r•nnnu•I u,-gntintiuux n:tlnri.•, of rcrwin t,acb,:ra. A,nn,l,ir %'nl- wero peudini;, nrt;ttnl�lc testy ntt tn,f:tir I,-c �••,'�,t„htr}• 1',lu�:+t„r. Asa'n .. Nv-tin I,rtim ire ill t•iulutiuu of the itudtiu A.-t „o (10%) 101 Cul.Itytr. 724, _.4 l:.A.J,i 675 STATE OF CAUFORNIA County of Orange I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the below entitled matter. I am a PUBU6.N0TICE - The,,mquesf includes pro-I principal clerk of the HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTIiCE OFF; caing additional park-; >> ing spaccee:and relocation of; PUBLIC NEARINQ the existing, trash enclo-: INDEPENDENT, a newspaper of general APPEAL OFPLANNING1 sure CO_ MMISSION'S ENVIRONMENTAL STA-.: circulation, printed and published in the City of 4 DENIAL TUS Categorically exempt' Huntington Beach County of Orange State of OF CONDITIONAL pursuant-to-Section 153 • EXCEPTION -• Class 5 of the California CaGfomia, and that attached Notice is a true and (VARIANCE)NO.92.17• EcoAS-(eOta-Quality Actis N I COASTAL..STATUS This Second driveway-to proiect is'located in the complete co as was printed and blushed in a commercial site) Coastal Zone but may be P PY P published NOTICE 1S HEREBY categorically excluded from) Y the Huntington Beach and Fountain Valle GIVEN that the Huntington the coasta development! Beach City CounciP will'. permits pursuant to Section issues of said newspaper to wit the issue(s) of: hold a public hearing in thel empty minor), which ex Council Chamber at the! empty minor variances that! Huntington` Beach Civic, do ,not pertain to height Center, 2000 Main Street,I and that-do not negatively `Huntington Beach, Califor-I impact coastal`access on nia,on the date and at the view corridors, `from I time indicated below to re-, coastal -development 'per- ceive and consider thef mits. statements of all persons, ON FILE: A copy of they who wish to be heard rela-! proposed request is on file tive to the application de-! in the Community Develop- scribed below' i. ment Department,'42000 DATE/TIME: Monday,' Main Street Huntington February 18, 1993 March 1,1993 7:00 PM Beach :California;. 92648, APPLICATION •NUMBER: for msPecpon by:the,pub- Conditionai Exception, lic. A_ copy,}of the.staft::re- (Variance)No.92-17 porf will be available:h.in- APPLICANT/APPELLANT: terested parties at City Hall Fred Hadlian or the Mam City library LOCATION: 16182 Pacific) �(7111 Talbert Avenue) after Coast Highway • = February.26,=1993t , Zone: Visitor Serving I ALL INTERESTEDF PER= Commercial-Coastal Zone SONS are invitedild._attend REQUEST: This is an ap- said`hearing and-express peal of the Planning Com- j opinions or submit evi- mission's denial of Condi dence in or to•the City tional Exception (Variance)I Clerk for or against the ap•I No. 92-17 which is a re- plication,asq outlined above quest to add _a second I or in .written C o.r driveway access with no in- respondence deliverpd- to ternal circulation from Pa-' the City Clerk at, or prior cific Coast Highway to an, to, the public.hearing. If declare, under penalty of perjury, that the existing- commercial site.! there are any further ques-1 lions Please call Jane.Mad-, foregoing is true and correct. era, Assistant Planner at 536-5271 i Connie. Brockway,1 Executed on February 1 9 r 199.3_. City;Clerk; Huntington: u Beach- City,:-l:ouncil,J 2000 Main Street,Hun- at Co Mesa, Califo is tington' Beach, CA 92648(714)t536-5227 P..ublised`Huntington; Beach-Fountair9 Valley; Independent February` Signature ,i993 .: �023998' t PROOF OF PUBLICATION "' REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION A Mask Date Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator Prepared by: Michael Adams, Director of Community Developmen Subject: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 92-17 QN a2/� bjt`CC� /93 HPar� 2& &SO r -ate Consistent with Council Policy? L4 Yes [ ] New Policy or ExceptionpW Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions, Attachments: «gJ STATEMENT OF ISSUE• Transmitted for City Council consideration is an appeal by Fred Hadjian of the Planning Commission' s denial of Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-17, a request to provide a second driveway and parking area at a commercial/office site. The conditional exception (variance) is necessary because there will be no internal circulation between the existing on-site parking area and the proposed parking area with driveway; and the proposed drive aisle is 10 ' in width in lieu of minimum 20 ' . As a result, vehicles must enter a public street in order to progress from one parking area to another within the same development. Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-17 was originally denied by the Zoning Administrator on May 27, 1992 and subsequently appealed to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission upheld the Zoning Administrator ' s action by denying the request on December 1, 1992 . The applicant is seeking to overturn the Planning Commission' s denial because the driveway existed when the property was purchased and the elimination of the driveway results in loss of property values . RECOMMENDATION• Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation: Motion to: "Deny the appeal and uphold the Planning Commission' s denial of Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-17 with findings for denial . Planning Commission Action on December 1, 1992 : A MOTION WAS MADE BY RICHARDSON, SECOND BY SHOMAKER TO DENY THE i APPEAL OF CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 92-17 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: / op PIO 5/85 AYES: Inglee, Bourguignon, Richardson, Shomaker, Dettloff, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: Newman ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED ANALYSIS: Proiect Request • Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-7 has been initiated because the proposal does not comply with the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, Article 960, Off-Street Parking and Landscaping in the following areas : 1. Section 9601.2 specifies that all off-street parking spaces shall have access to a public street or alley, and shall have internal circulation, safe entrances and exits, drives, and aisles in conformance with City standards. Traffic circulation shall be designed so that no vehicle need enter a public street in order to progress from one (1) aisle to any other aisle within the same development. The applicant is requesting a second driveway and parking area that does not provide internal circulation and safe ingress or egress as vehicles entering the driveway must perform a three point turn-around or exit the same direction. Vehicles must then enter. Pacific Coast Highway to travel to the other drive aisle for additional parking opportunities on the site. In addition, the driveway is not wide enough to accommodate two (2) vehicles at one time and, therefore, does meet the circulation design section of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. The code requires minimum 20 feet and only 10 feet is proposed. Coastal Status : This project is located in the Coastal Zone but may be categorically excluded from coastal development permits pursuant to Section 989 . 5. 3 . 13 (g) , which exempts minor variances that do not negatively impact coastal access or view corridors, from coastal development permits . This variance request for a driveway and parking area that does not provide internal circulation on the site does not negatively impact coastal access or coastal views as none is currently provided. RCA 1/19/93 -2- (5397d) Project History: Use Permit No. 90-18 and Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 90-19, submitted by the applicant, for an exterior facade improvement to an existing 2, 541 square feet office/commercial building were conditionally approved by the Zoning Administrator on June 20, 1990. At that time, vehicles could enter the property from Pacific Coast Highway on either side of the building because the property was not improved to current code standards; there were no curbs, gutters or sidewalks. The conditional exception (variance) permitted a reduced landscape planter adjacent to a public right-of-way (PCH) for a larger parking area to accommodate enough parking stalls, and a reduction to the minimum turning radius requirement (23 feet in lieu of 26 feet) . The approved plans depicted a single driveway to the north of the building and the southerly area was depicted as landscaping and outdoor recreation area. Basis for approval of the variance was due to the fact that the layout, with one driveway and an open space area, complied with code. The applicant has not yet brought the project into conformance with the approved plans as there is a second driveway and the proper landscaping has not been installed. The property owner was cited by Code Enforcement for non-compliance with the conditions of approval of Use Permit No. 90-18 and Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 90-19 and required to remove the second driveway. The property owner then submitted Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-17 as a request to allow the second driveway to remain. He stated at the time of the 1990 submittal, he did not realize the approved site plan did not include the southeasterly driveway. The Zoning Administrator denied the current request on May 27, 1992 (see attached minutes) and again required removal of the second driveway in accordance with the originally approved plan. It was denied because the additional driveway for one (1) parking space off a major arterial (Pacific Coast Highway) without on-site, internal circulation would: 1. Create potential conflicts between vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians along Pacific Coast Highway; 2 . Constitute a special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon properties in the vicinity because other parcels have typically only one (1) point of vehicular ingress and egress; and 3 . Eliminate landscaping and open space area that was used to justify a previously approved variance for reduced planter width (1' 6" in lieu of 10 ' ) between a parking area and Pacific Coast Highway. The denial has been appealed to the Planning Commission and now to the City Council. RCA 1/19/93 -3- (5397d) City of Huntington Beach -2- December 9 , 1992 Honorable Mayor & City Council would still have my driveway and seven more feet of property that I have already given to the City of Huntington Beach. At this point I have already spent $100 ,000 on the improvements I 've made and I still have $50 ,000 to spend to complete these. I respectfully request that the City Council overturn the decision of the Planning Commission and approve my request to have my driveway back. Very truly yours , r,/ya Fred Hadjian sc May 20,. 1992 py NARRATIVE FOR CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION(o (VARIANCE) FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 16182 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY The subject property is located on the north side of Pacific Coast 'Highway just east of Mariner Drive. The property to the north is occupided by carports for the Huntington Marina Condominiums. The property to the west is a planter area and entrance to the Huntington Marina Condominiums. The property to the east is occupied by the Ocean View Motel. The property on the south side of Pacific Coast Highway is residential . This application requests that a second driveway be allowed to be installed on the east side of the building as shown on Exhibit "A" . The applicant has been working on -site improvements on this property since 1990 . Prior to that, this property had two driveways, but due to the property' s unusual size and the building site location on the property, it is impossible to maintain circulation on-site. On a previous Use Permit Application, the eastern driveway was eliminated and as a result , --- the trash enclosure and parking space had to be eliminated. The trash enclosure was relocated on the westerly parking lot and a new parking plan was approved which allowed for nine parking spaces including one handicapped space. This conformed to the parking requirements at that time, which were one parking space per each 300 square feet of building area. Current parking standards in this area require one space for each 250 square feet of building area or in this case, ten parking spaces. Also, the applicant has been told by Rainbow Disposal that a building of this size requires a three yard trash receptical at a minimum. This will require an enclosure of a minimum of 618" by 818" . See attached copy of trash enclsure size which was given to the applicant by Rainbow Disposal . The current site plan only has nine parking spaces and will not accommodate a trash enclosure of the size required. A trash enclosure of the size required cannot be installed in the westerly parking lot without either eliminating a parking space or blocking the handicapped access to the building. In order for the applicant to fully utilize his property to the highest and best use, it is requested that he be allowed to reconstruct the driveway on the east side of his building. This will enable him to have one more parking space. -thus bringing his site up-to-code and also providing an area suitable for a trash enclosure of the size required. This additional driveway will: not have on-site circulation to the existing parking lot and driveway on the western side of the building. It is possible, however, for a vehicle to drive in, turn around, and exit safely unto Pacific Coast Highway. Even if a car is parking� in the single parking space, a car can drive in, turn around and exit safely. Public safety will be maintained by stripping and providing signs as shown in Exhibit "A" . A video has also been made which clearly shows one car entering and parking and another car entering, turning around and exiting while the first car is still parked. w v v. i A &V'vv 1 1,14U4.14E �� cQ P.O. BOX 1026 • HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 • PH: (714) 847.3581 FAX: (714) 8414880 TELECOPIER COVER LETTER,, DATE: TIME PHONE #s �� FROM: " RAINBOW. DISPOSAL COMPANY INC. RE: -r � 'S TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES, (INCLUDING THIS PAGE) REMARKS s •., +J� % , ¢ ..._ NOTICE: THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL, OR ENTITY TO 1,HICH IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION .THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL, AND. EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW, THANK YOU. IF.: ,YOU , ARE NOT RECEIVING OUR COPIES, PLEASE INFORM US Ir1MEDIATELY. . OUR NUMBER IS 714-847-3681.. OUR FAX NUMBER IS 714�-841-4660 . _. .... .. �vvv r T IJ vc I IJ14v I 114041499V"T •11418 L . - STANDARD DRAWING :a. iLl -- Ul MM PEAS o S N"; Ul iLl V Ilj iiiiii...///\\\i.�rrw���rrr.••���w.. Q T ASk Fred Hadjian COP 16182 Pacific Coast Hwy. Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 June 5 , 1992 City of Huntington Beach P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach, Ca.92648 Attn: Executive Secretary of the Planning Commission Re: Appeal of Zoning Administrator' s denial of Conditional .Exception No 92-17 Dear Madam: On May 20, 1992, the Zoning Administrator of the City of Huntington Beach, Mr. Scott Hess, denied Conditional Exception No. 92-17 . I am hereby appealing Mr. Hess's action. The request which was denied was to allow my existing driveway on the east side of my buildings to 'remain open at 16182 Pacific Coast Highway and to allow for the trash enclosure and one parking space to be placed in the. area served by. thiso driveway. _ When I purchased the property, I had two driveways; one on the east side and one on. the west side of my building. My building was too close to my rear property line to have circulation between them. In 1990, a site plan was prepared for Use Permit 90-18 and Conditional Exception No. 90-19. This site plan was approved. I wasn' t' aware that the driveway was eliminated and therefore, I did not appeal. I do not want to lose .my driveway. It will only be used ,by one car because there is only one parking space and it will not create a traffic hazard. The closest driveway to the east is 350 feet away andrmy other driveway to the west is 100 feet away. I do.-not think by keeping my driveway, it will create a significant traffic hazard. I need my driveway because I only have nine spaces now, and the code requires ten. Also I need my driveway because the trash enclosure as shown on the existing approved site plan will prevent the handicapped access . to my building. The trash enclosure should be on the -east side of my building where it has always been. The Rainbow Disposal Co. does not drive into the driveways along Pacific Coast Highway, so my driveway on the east side of my building would only be used to roll the trash bin in and out. This will be better than the way it is now because the trash bin has to be rolled out through the driveway on the west side of my building which interferes with the traffic in and out of my customers' parking area. I feel that I am being deprived -of -my rights just because of the fact that my building was built over forty years ago too close to my rear property line and therefore,-.-I cannot connect my east and west parking areas with..on-site circulation. I want to have the opportunity to appeal this to the Planning commission. Very truly yours, Fred Hadjian huntington beach department of communit y development_,; STAff REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMARY DECEMBER 1. 1992 APPEAL OF ZONING ADMINISTRATOR' S DENIAL OF CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 92-17 (16182 Pacific Coast Highway) This is an appeal of the Zoning Administrator ' s denial of a request to add a second driveway to an existing commercial/office site. The driveway requires a conditional exception (variance) because there is no internal vehicular circulation between the new driveway and the existing main driveway on the site. The request also includes the provision of an additional parking space and relocation of the existing trash enclosure. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission uphold the Zoning Administrator ' s action and deny the conditional exception (variance) because it increases the points of ingress/egrees on Pacific Coast Highway, it does not meet Caltran' s minimum driveway width requirement of 30 feet, vehicles must enter Pacific Coast Highway to travel to the other side of the site, and it results in unsafe circulation. In addition, the new parking space is not necessary to be considered in conformance with the parking code and the trash enclosure may be relocated to the south site without also providing complete vehicular access . ATTACHMENT NO. _. A-PL-FM-230 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Community Development DATE: December 1, 1992 SUBJECT: APPEAL OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR' S DENIAL OF CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 92-17 APPLICANT/ APPELLANT/ PROPERTY Fred Hadjian, 16182 Pacific Coast Highway, OWNER: Huntington Beach, CA 92648 REQUEST: This is an appeal of the Zoning Administrator ' s denial of Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-17 which is a request to add a second driveway access from Pacific Coast Highway without on-site, internal circulation between parking areas of an existing commercial site. The request also includes the provision of an additional parking space and relocation of the existing trash enclosure. LOCATION: 16182 Pacific Coast Highway DATE ACCEPTED: June 6, 1992 ZONE: VSC-CZ (Visitor Serving Commercial-Coastal Zone) GENERAL PLAN: Commercial-Visitor Serving EXISTING USE: Office Building ACREAGE: . 17 acres 1 .0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Motion to : "Uphold the Zoning Administrator ' s action by denying the appeal of Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-17 with findings for denial . " 2 .0 GENERAL INFORMATION: This is an appeal of the Zoning Administrator ' s denial of Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-17 which is a request to add a second driveway access from Pacific Coast Highway to an existing office building . Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-7 has been initiated because the proposal does not comply with the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, Article 960, Off-Street Parking and Landscaping in the following areas : 1. Section 9601.2 specifies that all off-street parking spaces shall have access to a public street or alley, and shall have internal circulation, safe entrances and exits, drives, and aisles in conformance with City standards . Traffic circulation shall be designed so that no vehicle need enter a public street in order to progress from one (1) aisle to any other aisle within the same development . The applicant is requesting a second driveway that does not provide internal circulation and safe ingress or egress as vehicles entering the driveway must perform a three point turn-around or exit the same direction. Vehicles must then enter Pacific Coast Highway to travel to the other drive aisle for additional parking opportunities on the site. In addition, the driveway is not wide enough to accommodate two (2) vehicles at one time and, therefore, does meet the circulation design section of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. The code requires minimum 20 feet and only 10 feet is proposed. 3 . 0 SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS: North of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: High Density Residential ZONE: R4-CZ (High Density Residential-Coastal Zone) LAND USE: Condominiums East and West of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Visitor Serving Commercial ZONE: VSC-CZ (Visitor Serving Commercial- Coastal Zone) LAND USE: Retail Office South of Subject Property: LAND USE: Pacific Coast Highway and Pacific Ocean 4 . 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to Class 5, Section 15305 of the California Environmental Quality Act . Staff Report - 12/1/92 -2- (5147d) 5 . 0 COASTAL STATUS: This project is located in the Coastal Zone but may be categorically excluded from coastal development permits pursuant to Section 989 . 5 .3 . 13(g) , which exempts minor variances that do not negatively impact coastal access or view corridors, from coastal development permits . This variance is a request for a driveway that does not provide internal circulation on the site which does not negatively impact coastal access or coastal views as none is currently provided. 6 . 0 REDEVELOPMENT STATUS: Not applicable. 7 .0 SPECIFIC PLAN: Not applicable. 8 . 0 SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE: Not applicable. 9 . 0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: Project History Use Permit No . 90-18 and Conditional Exception (Variance) No . 90-19 , submitted by the applicant, for an exterior facade improvement to an existing 2, 541 square feet office/commercial building were conditionally approved by the Zoning Administrator on June 20, 1990 . At that time, vehicles could enter the property from Pacific Coast Highway on either side of the building . The conditional exception permitted a reduced landscape planter adjacent to a public right-of-way for a larger parking area to accommodate enough parking stalls, and a reduction to the minimum turning radius requirement (23 feet in lieu of 26 feet) .The approved plans depicted a single driveway to the north of the building and the southerly area depicted as landscaping and outdoor recreation area. Basis for approval of the request was due to the fact that the layout, with one driveway and an open space area, complied with code. The applicant has not yet brought the project into conformance with the approved plans as there is a second driveway and the proper landscaping has not been installed. The property owner was cited by Code Enforcement for non-compliance with the conditions of approval of Use Permit No. 90-18 and Conditional Exception (Variance) No . 90-19 and required to remove the second driveway. The property owner then submitted Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-17 as a request to allow the second driveway to remain. He stated at that time that he did not realize the approved site plan did not include the southeasterly driveway. The Zoning Administrator denied the request on May 27, 1992 (see attached minutes) and again required removal of the second driveway. It was denied because the additional driveway for one (1) parking space off a major arterial (Pacific Coast Highway) without on-site, internal circulation would: 1 . Create potential conflicts between vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians along Pacific Coast Highway; Staff Report - 12/1/92 -3- (5147d) 2 . Constitute a special privilege inconsistent with upon properties in the vicinity because other parcels have typically only one (1) point of vehicular ingress and egress; acid 3 . Eliminate landscaping and open space area that was used to jusitfy a previously approve variance for reduced planter width , (1 ' 6" in lieu of 10 ' ) between a parking area and Pacific Coast Highway. The denial has been appealed to the Planning Commission. Analysis Staff recommends that the Planning Commission uphold the Zoning Administrator ' s action and deny the appeal because of the reasons . cited by the Zoning Administrator. The lack of internal circulation .. := between the two drive aisles results in double loading and traffic conflicts with Pacific Coast Highway. The goals of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code Article 960, Parking includes reducing the points of ingress and egress along streets and arterials and ensuring safe traffic circulation. In addition, the southeasterly driveway does not meet the minimum 30 feet driveway width typically required by Caltrans as it is only 18 feet wide at Pacific Coast Highway. The applicant must also obtain a permit from Caltrans for the second driveway access . The 18 foot width is barely one-half (1/2) of the Caltrans requirement. Also, the actual driveable portion of the access way on the property itself is further reduced to ten (10) feet wide. Twenty feet is required for drive aisles such as this . The potential for vehicle and traffic conflicts is great in this area as the drive can only accommodate one (1) car at a time for one-way travel . It is highly possible that first time visitors to the site will enter the driveway while another car is already there and then be forced to back-out onto Pacific Coast Highway. This situation results in an awkward traffic pattern which would be very confusing to a motorist unfamiliar with the site. vehicles entering commercial sites should be able to travel to additional parking areas at the same area if a parking space is not available. The City' s Public Works Engineering Division recommends denial of this request . The applicant ' s appeal letter states that the southeasterly driveway is necessary because the trash enclosure can not be properly located on the north side of the property as previously required. The Zoning Administrator 's action on May 27, 1992 included the provision to relocate the trash enclosure to the south side of the building but prohibited vehicular access . A small concrete pathway from the trash enclosure to Pacific Coast Highway would allow the trash bin to be rolled down to the street as Rainbow Disposal requires . Staff Report - 12/1/92 -4- (5147d) t` i 1 Another point of the appeal letter is that the addition of a: parking; ; . space on the south side of the building brings the site into conformance with the number of parking spaces required by code. However, the nine (9) spaces currently provided on-site is consistent with the parking code that was in effect at the time of a project approval . The tenth parking space is not necessary to bring the site into compliance and the potential conflict and hazardous circulation of the second access outweigh the benefits of gaining' one (1) parking space. There is a feasible alternative to the driveway access on Pacific Coast Highway that the property owner could pursue. An on-site access easement between the property to the southeast, a motel, and the office building driveway would allow access to the tenth parking space while reducing traffic conflicts on Pacific Coast Highway. This would achieve the applicant' s goal as well as comply with City' s circulation and driveway standards . The adjacent lot contains a drive aisle that terminates at the southeasterly property line. No driveway would be necessary off Pacific Coast Highway .and the majority of landscaping area would be preserved. In conclusion, staff recommends denial of the appeal because: 1. There is a lack of on-site circulation; 2 . It will create potential ingress and egress conflicts on an arterial highway; 3 . The driveway width is only 18 feet in width (27 ' minimum is required by the city) which is not wide enough to accomodate adequate maneuverability into and out from the site; 4 . The on-site drive aisle is substandard (10 ' in lieu of 20 ' ) ; 5 . It will result in a loss of on-site landscaping and open space area pursuant to a previously approved use permit which justified a variance in conjunction with the use permit; and 6 . There is design option available to the applicant which is to access the southerly portion of the site from an adjoining lot that contains a drive aisle terminating at the common property line. 10 . 0 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission uphold the Zoning Administrator ' s action and deny the appeal of Conditional Exception (Variance) No . 92-17 with the following findings: Staff Report - 12/1/92 -5- (5147d) FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO 92-17 : . 1. Since the subject property can be fully developed within regular established setbacks, such a conditional exception for an additional driveway along Pacific Coast Highway for the existing office building and with no on-site internal circulation is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights . The renovation of the existing commercial building, approved under Use Permit No. 90-18 and Conditional Exception No. 90-19 , complied with the parking requirements based on the code at that time. The additional driveway, has the potential to create additional vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian conflicts along Pacific Coast Highway. The additional parking space does not warrant the conflicts between .. vehicles entering and exiting the site, and reduction in landscaping. In addition, there is a design option available to: the applicant which is to access the southerly portion of the site from an adjoining lot . 2 . Granting of Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-17 for an additional driveway along Pacific Coast Highway for the existing office building and with no on-site, internal circulation between the two parking areas would constitute a special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon properties in the vicinity. Other parcels along Pacific Coast Highway in the vicinity have only one point of ingress and egress (driveway) . 3 . Exceptional circumstances do not apply that deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the same zone classifications . 4 . Although the property is irregular in configuration, the proposed driveway access on the southerly property line will create a hazardous situation with vehicular ingress and egress and northbound traffic on Pacific Coast Highway. 5 . The proposed driveway would create awkward circulation movements on-site and cause potential ingress and egress conflicts on an arterial highway. The driveway width is only 18 feet in width (27 ' minimum is required by the city) which is not wide enough to accomodate adequate two-way maneurvering into and out from the site. 6 . The driveway will result in a loss of on-site landscaping and open space area pursuant a previously approved use permit which justified a variance for reduced planter width (1 ' 6" in lieu of 10 ' ) along Pacific Coast Highway next to the northerly parking area. 11. 0 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The Planning Commission may overturn the Zoning Administrator ' s action and approve Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-17 with findings and suggested conditions of approval . Staff Report - 12/1/92 -6- (5147d) ATTACHMENTS: 1 . Site plan dated November 23 , 1992 2 . Previously approved site plan (UP No . 90-18/CE No . 90-19) 3 . Applicant ' s appeal letter dated June 5, 1992 4 . Zoning Administrator minutes dated May 27, 1992 SH:JM:kjl I Staff Report - 12/1/92 -7- (5147d) M•i:Y" Y i•n LOT COVERAGE STATISTICS J_ 'TEN AREA S0.FT. PERCENTAGE 1.) Mn AREA 7763 Too Z J R OR(VE I i 3.) ON FOOT PRINT 1379 17.6 Z µ InO10]ED TnwiN ENClO5U1E s'•a•'k a•-a^ _, 3.) FRONT T S 6TBAG( 4 S NOT 1370 17,7 Z fNmq nFOINREp IER RAm[pW DLabfK INCLUDED N OPEN PAS E [Yls flwp CONt.aw+l[ c +.) PARKING AREA NCLJ00.MG. 3669 +7.3 Z DRIVEWAYS `. AREAS--- N. MNNG AI [rIETMO 1nwaN<nGt Oluw[wn[w G . Is CROSS I / C. TURNING REAS AND CROSS HAlCMO RCw i NOl lA—1— 11.n4-1.a R No GOnrllcrs wlrN WEN L+ I LYAn. !.) EM SPACE INCLUOINC: 13s2 17.3 Z wwD onwZ., SIDEWALK(ON Silt) B.)LANOSCAPNC 100 z C.)3 NO.LEVEL DECK 1 ^' wnolcwl Ancw N+.+'+ .�/`..:..•...: "' /> t��\ 1111(1),,,//// w oaew.eo wnEA � ' 1 I DE AREA (]ND.0.ILOOn7 1—CAIEo—A I // I [awirq cONCwp[wnfA l:l I y I3 sum o f'(- O oFF1nE BRLOING PARKING O ; 1.) BUILDING FLOOR AREA 7511 SO.FT. M1�; liw ato• la-� 'F Z.) PARKING REGARD 10.1 3.) E)aSTWC PARKING 9 R .O PARRINGMO AREA "PROVEDt.lf,wNO �. V OEIDlW AIt Ant• ti; a.) PROPOSED PARKING �1,I.� COw°o-fi�DwWa .woven. 'A*+ NOTES: •---� � Inowoseo pnn[w+T . f ..novto cunt a o�*rtn Y !: D 1O-0 CTDSTMC PARKING SPACES T� A 10 PROPOSED PARKING SPACES -+— O 9CH -EMPLOYEE PARKING ONLY- PACIFIC COAST HWY. Q SIGN VA0DMG OUT ON WpNWAY PROHOTED- T © STRING ON OOSIWc RYICRETE SIGN -NO PARKING• EO SIGN -AD PMMG,TURN MOUND AREA ONLY. VEHICLES SHALL TURN MOUND SACXNC OUT ON 19GNWAY PRCI MTCO- z , OR.m PRESENT ZONE VSC-CZ R.FRED NADJAN R.NERAI RAN DCSK:NATON C-VS , im PACIFIC COAST H9IY. NLWTNGIM BCAOI,CA.M.P EXHIBIT 'A' O LOAN CENTER SYTE PLAN _ prus.u�aA�uoaAres FOR .a..�NNG .=Nr,•.,pA VARIANCE NO. Nawwa YTW — ]N1 / Ao[]-66T On Or HUNTINGTON BEACH CALIFORNIA 92-867 CIA. 1 /'� 1. 'J.•� l I ._.. ._..... Nram TEMPORARY DENCIIMARK I► Icon-fRAcToR To VERIFY L.o4 -rlo t OEPTH of 5EWGR I_q'TORAL J.j3 "r0 8 Cj p / r ��� \ Y•_,•,�S.t'.. y_�/ .gyp.,`\��+• 1 O��(, �3•`/ y -rF7A511 1-4 ,`\J •\ �' %� Snwu17.UNE�O' � .. 1, `� ``T, O(bN 'I� NN �n F• l� ( .: Q. D• .� � I s .00 E r� z fl t, ! 3' s �FiaTft Li 7.7 r9 9�09 9 4 s 23.0, i- f5' I' W 4^ EXIST. pFFIGE_ e xI SY G .. 46 !o LLI R•Sy T99 L =R'. 4-" J7 _m .o. 0 s c - pi ,_I���"-•- I �.y1 F.F. .(PRoTEGT)` JK' G2 1 2 - w g7 o 2.�i 1 I I(o.5 1"].O' .�....-,_... 8� 4�' �• p •� h G-OtWA.LK LTO6 AHp�11J� 9 1 .51 �'{`� � 1<i � -- �O l•{ 9illl � CL.. I'���� .D� � �i ��8.2�.'P,.L., y�/ a Q��U �•� •CV �°I ) U yr FL. I% I�5. .r . .Pf.RKwAY OR41N p o v\o,0�, m m� _ �_ Mt `/r � '..' f� rf G t paasT• P..A I Ov� y 137.00 < ti.43'29 ti, qh, 14� `� pt�y 10 �q° — `�.fl N,_H•'•� l_st sIf7ieBrfl.al `LXtyf. P wa�TCR MAt� A .c�'' STORM � D�'.n�u v O> �0 �•�'�. IS i \_- _. — ,: L.D. S.D. hC.o�., 10;�.Q•';:•. SP. .� h�Y STFtE`T IMPROVENIEPIT PLAus'�\ �}r �� -T-' 0 0 - 5EE tr,. l D•. E:e I ST. C. C,AS q. Fred Hadjian �. 16182 Pacific Coast Hwy. h° °} Huntington Beach, Ca. 92646 June 5 , 1992 City of Huntington Beach P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach, Ca . 92648 Attn : Executive Secretary of the Planning Commission Re: Appeal of Zoning Administrator ' s denial of Conditional Exception No . 92-17 Dear Madam: On May 20 , 1992 , the Zoning Administrator of the City of Huntington Beach, Mr . Scott hose, denied Conditional Exception No . 92-17 . I am hereby appealing Mr . Hess ' s action . The request which was denied was to allow my existing driveway on the east side of my buildings to remain open at 1.6182 Pacific Coast Highway and to allow for the trash enclosure and one parking space to be placed in tho area served by this driveway. When I purchased the property, I had two driveways ; one on the east side and de on the west side of my building . My building was too close to my rear operty line to have circulation between them . In 1990 , a site plan was epared for Use Permit 90-16 and Conditional exception No . 90-19 . This site plan was approved , I wasn ' t aware that the driveway was eliminated and therefore, I did not appeal . I do not want to lose my driveway . It will only be used by one car because there is only one parking space and it will not create a traffic hazard. The closest driveway to the east is 350 feet away and my other driveway to the weet is 100 feet away , I do not think by keeping my driveway , it will create a significant traffic hazard . I need my driveway because I only have nine spaces now, and the code requires ten. Also I need my driveway because the trash enclosure as shown on the existing approved sate plan will prevent the handicapped access to my building . The trash enclosure should be on the east side of my building where it has always been. The Raln.bow Disposal Co . does not drive into the driveways along Pacific Coast Highway, so my driveway on the east side of my huilding would only be u3ed to roll the trash bin in and out . Thia will be better than the way it is now because the trash bin has to be rolled out through the - driveway on the west side of my building which interferes with the traffic in and out of my customers ' parking area . I feel that I am being deprived of my rights just because of the fait that my building was built over forty years ago too close to my rear property line and therefore , I cannot comnect my east and west parking areas with on-site circulation. I want to have the opportunity to appeal s to the Planning Co=ission . Very truly yours , Fred Had j lan�ATTACHMENT N0. 3 TTEM 5- CONDITIONAL EXCEPTI N NO 92-17 Applicant : Fred Hadjian 16182 Pacific Coast Highway .`; Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Request : To approve a variance to allow a second driveway to the commercial site which would prohibit interior circulation from one driveway to another pursuant to Section 9601 . 2 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code . The request includes providing an additional parking space and relocation of the existing trash enclosure. Location: 16182 Pacific Coast Highway Wayne Carvalho, Staff Planner , reported that a Use Permit for exterior facade improvements and interior alterations was approved on the subject property two years ago . The applicant is requesting a variance to allow a second driveway off Pacific Coast Highway which would allow vehicular access south of the building . Staff indicated that the Department of Public Works and Community Development were opposed to the request . Staff concluded by recommending denial with findings . THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED . Dick Cahl , representing the applicant , indicated that when the Use Permit was approved in 1990 , the applicant did not understand that outherly driveway was required to be eliminated and replaced Z'- Eny landscaping . He further stated that the Rainbow Disposal is requiring a larger trash container . However, the approved trash location was not adequate in space, and would require taking up an additional required parking space . Joan Peoples , representing the homeowners association directly to the north of the .property, spoke in opposition to the request . She indicated that the property owner did not comply with several conditions imposed as a result of the use permit approval . She also stated that the second entrance creates a very hazardous situation. Fred Hadajian, applicant, advised that the two driveways were at that location for forty years . He bought the property and had spent a lot of money improving it and now felt he was being punished by the City. There were no other persons present to speak for or against the request and the public hearing was closed . Scott Hess , Zoning Administrator , stated that he would allow the trash container to be placed on the south side of the building but would prohibit vehicular access and installation of a driveway. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 92-17 WAS DENIED BY THE ZONING � ADMINISTRATOR WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS. THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR ` s' ' ED THAT THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR CAN BE ED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION WITHIN TEN CALENDAR (10) DAYS. ZA Minutes - 5/27/92 -7-ATTACHMENT N0. � (3536d) FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO 92 17 : 1 . Since the subject property can be fully developed within regular established setbacks , such a conditional exception for an additional driveway along Pacific Coast Highway for the existing office building and with no on-site internal circulation is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights . The renovation of the existing commercial building , approved under Use Permit No . 90-18 and Conditional Exception No . 90-19 , complied with the parking requirements based on the code at that time . The additional driveway, has the potential to create additional vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian conflicts along Pacific Coast Highway. The additional parking space does not warrant the conflicts between vehicles entering and exiting the site, and reduction in landscaping . 2 . Granting of Conditional Exception (Variance) No . 92-17 for an additional driveway along Pacific Coast Highway for the existing office building and with no on-site, internal circulation between the two parking areas would constitute a special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon properties in the vicinity. Other parcels along Pacific Coast Highway in the vicinity have only one point of ingress and egress (driveway) . 3 . Exceptional circumstances do not apply that deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the same zone classifications . 4 . Although the property is irregular in configuration, the proposed driveway access on the southerly property line will create a hazardous situation with vehicular ingress and egress and northbound traffic on Pacific Coast Highway. THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 2 :45 PM BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR TO THE NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 3 , 1992, AT 1 : 30 PM. — 'ZA Scott Hess Zoning Administrator -jr i y:• ��' .fit.:� ZA Minutes - 5/27/92 --8- (3536d) ATTACHMENT NO. 5 ALTERNATIVE FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 92-17 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 92-17: 1. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the land, buildings or premises involved that do not apply generally to other property or uses in the district. The property is irregular in shape the building was constructed at the rear of the property and internal circulation between the driveways is not possible. 2 . The granting of a conditional exception for a second driveway with no internal circulation is necessary in order to preserve the enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights . 3 . The granting of Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-17 for a second driveway with no internal circulation will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, or injurious to the conforming land, property, or improvements in the neighborhood. 4 . The conditional exception (variance) for a second driveway with no internal circulation is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City' s General Plan and Land Use Map designation of Visitor Serving Commercial . 5 . The establishment, maintenance and operation of the proposed second driveway with no internal circulation will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; and property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. 6 . The granting of the conditional exception (variance) for a second driveway with no internal circulation will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 7 . The applicant is willing and able to carry out the purposes for which the conditional exception (variance) is sought and he will proceed to do so without unnecessary delay. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 92-17: 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated November 23, 1992 shall be the conceptually approved layout. 2 . All outstanding conditions of approval of Use Permit No. 90-18 and Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 90-19, including street improvements and landscape installation, shall be completed within 120 days of final project approval. The following conditions of approval shall be deleted and revised as listed below: l.b. The trash enclosure may be located at the rear of the site, adjacent to the easterly driveway. 4 . a . The northwesterly driveway approach shall be a minimum of twenty-seven (27) feet in width and the southeasterly driveway approach shall be a minimum of eighteen (18) feet in width. Both driveway approaches shall be of radius-type construction. 3 . The applicant shall install a mechanized security gate across the southeasterly driveway. The gate shall be subject to approval of the Public Works Department and Community Development Department. 4 . The entire site shall be reasphalted, repaved, and relandscaped in accordance with the plans dated November 23, 1992 . 5 . This Conditional Exception shall become null and void if the eighteen foot driveway approach is not approved by Caltrans . (5397d-8, 9) , rl , (l Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach �._.... , ,.. ._.._�.,._,_.,�W,..,.w......... '` `t,_;;�;ti'��^;.• . .. •; Office of the City Clerk P it E"'M R T y � n rp P.O. Box 190 JAI.129 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 FIRST ASS �,l rR 4.w �• HIL- ti2.- li 178-471-23 i r t-h-B`radrick s-z1- 11- 65 Su.rf8ide Ct B Surfside, CA 90743 INGTpy -9 _ HILf::RE T H H=HI...tal' D I.1P 9 'i )—` :: t'::1f.: cFcpUNTYg CP`�� RET�_r"I-f TO ..-�E��':DF: LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION ' S DENIAL OF CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 92-17 (Second driveway to a commercial site . ) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, March 1, 1993, 7 : 00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-17 APPLICANT/ APPELLANT: Fred Hadjian LOCATION: 16182 Pacific Coast Highway ZONE: Visitor Serving Commercial - Coastal Zone REOUEST: This is an appeal of the Planning Commission' s denial of Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-17 which is a request to add a second driveway access with no internal circulation from Pacific Coast Highway to an existing commercial site. The request includes providing an additional parking space and relocation of the existing trash enclosure. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15305, Class 5 of the California Environmental Quality Act. COASTAL STATUS: This project is located in the Coastal Zone but may be categorically excluded from coastal development permits pursuant to Section 989 . 5 .3 . 13(g) , which exempts minor variances that do not pertain to height and that do not negatively impact coastal access or view corridors , from coastal development permits . ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648 , for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library (7111 Talbert Avenue) after February 26 , 1993 . (0 VE R NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING (Continued) ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence in writing to the City Clerk for or against the application as outlined above or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call Jane Madera, Assistant Planner at 536-5271. Connie Brockway, City Clerk Huntington Beach City Council 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714) 536-5227 (5469d) -7141q3 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 92-17 (Second driveway to a commercial site. ) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, March 1, 1993, 7:00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-17 APPLICANT/ APPELLANT: Fred Hadjian LOCATION: 16182 Pacific Coast Highway ZONE: Visitor Serving Commercial - Coastal Zone REOUEST: This is an appeal of the Planning Commission' s denial of Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-17 which is a request to add a second driveway access with no internal circulation from Pacific Coast Highway to an existing commercial site. The request includes providing an additional parking space and relocation of the existing trash enclosure. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15305, Class 5 of the California Environmental Quality Act. COASTAL STATUS: This project is located in the Coastal Zone but may be categorically excluded from coastal development permits pursuant to Section 989 . 5 .3 . 13(g) , which exempts minor variances that do not pertain to height and that do not negatively impact coastal access or view corridors, from coastal development permits . ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library (7111 Talbert Avenue) after February 26, 1993 . NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING (Continued) ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence in writing to the City Clerk for or against the application as outlined above or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call Jane Madera, Assistant Planner at 536-5271. Connie Brockway, City Clerk Huntington Beach City Council 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714) 536-5227 (5469d) STATE OF CAUFORNIA County of Orange I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the below entitled matter. I am a principal cleric of the HUNTINGTON BEACH . ^� INDEPENDENT, a newspaper of general Jv circulation, printed and published in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of pusuc.rioricE — _ Califomia, and that attached Notice is a true and NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL �STa w TUS Categoricallywe'? complete co as was printed and published in PUBLIC'HEARIN y= pursuant fo Section'1`53051 p copy APPEALzOF.+P ING Class'S}of the Califorrna, the Huntington Beach and Fountain Valle ctiMMls N s t EnvvonmentalfOualityAct Y DE l _COA`STAL STATUS Thisti issues of said newspaper to wit the issue(s) of: OF C DITIONAL j protect is located thee Coastal. Zon CEPTIONebut:may be ANGE-N0 92 t-7 categorically ezciLi'ded from V ( ) I the coastal development econd:driveway tot permits ' rsuanCfo Section a commercial site.)';'< I 989 its.13(g), which ex-} NOTICE 18 'H'E_R E E�Ye einpts•minor variances tfiati GIVEN that the Huntington do not pertain to heights Beach City Council 6g.4 and that�d'o not negatively, holds public':heanng in'the' j impact- coastal 'access or1a, Council Chamber at' the,` view corridors,` from i Huntington Beach Civic coastal development'per February 4 1993 Center, 2000 .Main Street mils " :A •r r 't + Huntington Beach Caltfor- �'CN FILE: A copy=lof-the nia on-the'date'and at then pioposed--request ts'kon fife",•; time indicated below to re-' ' iri the!Cortimi nity Develop,,i ceive and corisitr,­the merit r•Department;_ 2000 statements of 'all persons Main' Street `Hun`tingtom'- who,w(sh.to be'heardy,re la-. ' Beach'f CaliforniS 9264t3 ' We'to the applications de for inspecion by the scntied below `'� tic A copflof-the"staffor6- OA.TE/TIME . Tuesday, port will,bi—availableUp-,n February 16 1993j7:00 PM terested parties at..City Hall APPLICATION- NgMBER: or�thet-Mam*Cfty1AUbrary l( Conditional _Exception_ (Z111 TadiertWA 4e 0e),tafter_ll (Vartahce)No 92'-- February. L2 19934 : r b.EALL INTERESTD 'PE -, APPLICANT/APPELLANT:4, Fred``Hadtian -;,-'" - + SONS�are invrted�to4attend': LOCATION 16182 Pacifica said hearing and express' Coast(Highway " ' �; I opinions '"'or submit ev"i-'a Zone: Visitor=4Serving dence in writing to.theICity Commercial 'Coastal Zorieq, ;_Cleildfor or against the ap-" I declare under penalty of perjury that the REQUEST This is an ap;E plicahonrasrouthneiljabove + + peal of'the Planning Com-' o r tj,fnnr w r i t t1-0- forp�oln IS true and Correct. mission's denier"of Condi- respondence tdetweredto. "� 9 Donal Exception,(Van ance)s, the City�rClerk at,txor,,,pnorY No -92-17 which` is are-�; to the-pubI&-hea'nng _If quest `to add"a second there are rany(furtherxques , 1�(� driveway access with no ih- tions piease+call�Jane Mad Executed on February 4 , r ternal circulation;from-Pa- era Assisdfif ,P,lanne)r at Icdic Coast Highway to'an 536 527�1 r : at Costa a, California existing commercial a site.. Connie �Br�ock�way, r The request includes'pro-� City,Clerk, Huntngton vidmg=an additional park Beach City C�ouncrf mg'space and re(ocation"6 2000 Main Street,Hun'. the existing trash enclo- t•i,ngtoir<,Beach 4CA sure.___ "$' 92648 714)536=5227 SI natur@ g °Published Huntington , Beach`�Fountain``Valley��• alndeper>dent- February,, 4;1993. ' _ 1 0219f1 ; PROOF OF PUBLICATION 93b-90-004 178-481-02 David A Gustaf Randall L & Brenda Turnbow 15938 , er Dr. 16186 Surfside Ave H '.gton Beach, CA Seal Beach CA 92663 178-472-20 178-481-05 William and Dorothy Davila Robert E & StOirfside6CA 90743 Bacon 16192 Surfside A e 1 Seal Beach CA 92663 178-472-30 Robert and Marilyn Quaid ' 930-90-013 -- .. Arm R Grant_ 10521 Easterhill Dr. 9844 S pan Santa Ana CA 92705iey C 902unt 41 Blvd. 178-472-21 ' 930-90-005 Brunn John P Tr Virginia M PO Box 236 15944 Marinero Surfside CA 90743 Huntington Dr Beach CA _.. 92649 178-472-20 William S & Dorothy Davila 178 471-17 PO Box 261 Nolan W Cramer Surfside CA 90743 PO Box 475-B-73 Surfside CA 90743 ,. 178-472-30 - Robert A & Marilyn d 178-471-21 10521 Easter 11 DDrrt�ai Sant R & Greta Kennedy Santa Ana 92705 PO Box 394 Surfside CA 90743 Joan "JP" Peoples 178-481-13 16184 Mariner Drive Mike Klistoff Huntington Beach CA 92649 10243 Lesterford Ave , Downey CA 90241 William D Holman 178-481-43/178-471-25 Pacific Coast Homes John M. Artukovich 2124 Main St PO Box 195 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2499 Surfside CA 90743 930-91-024 Kert Jordan 16066 Mariner Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 L 178-472-19 930-91 Robert and Rebecca Kendrick Marion Tunks A-64 16042 Mariner Dr Surfside CA 90743 Huntington Beach CA 92649 930-91-022 178-472-22 i will Uniack Steve & Victoria Rinek j PO Box 188 16058 Mariner Dr Surfside CA 90743 Huntington Beach CA 92649 930-90-003 178-581-01 Bruce C & Janice Kavin Point Mariner's 15936 Mariner Dr 15922 Coast Hwy Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 90651 -- 178-581-12 930-90-006 - Babubhai. G Patel Robert W Miller 16220 Gast Hwy 15946 Mariner Dr Huntington Beach CA 92651 Huntington Beach CA 92649 178-581-18,19 930-90-009 Odis Bozarth Spencer R Alter 16214 Coast Hwy 15956 Mariner Dr Huntington Beach CA 92651 Huntington Beach CA 92649 930-900-16 930-90-012 Ernest V. Siracusa, Jr. John H Doran PO Box 17267 15962 Mariner Dr Irvine CA 92713 Huntington Beach CA 92649 930-90-015 Edna Littlebury Grosh Jack Tr Golden St. Mob.Hm.Owners Leag. 2117 Sunnybank 11021 Magnolia Blvd LaCanada CA 91011 Garden Grove CA 92642 930-90-001 Steven A & Nancy Peterman 15932 Mariner Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 930-90-004 David A Gustafson 15938 Mariner Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 930-90-011 93b-90-018 Benton Whitehead Ashley J Smith 15960 Mariner Dr 15982 Mariner Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 930-90-014 930-90-021 Dale E Anderson Robbi Bailor 15970 Mariner Dr 15992 Mariner Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 - ', 930-91-005 930-90-017 Hyams Thomas E & Thomas E Tr Edna B Kogan 16008 Mariner Dr i ^i 15980 Mariner Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 `y -�` Huntington Beach CA 92649 ----------- - --- ------------ - 178-481-0 3 .a; 930-91-008 Schlange Alfred H Tr Petersen Dorothy Tr 16188 Surfside Ave 16018 Mariner Dr Seal Beach CA 92663 Huntington Beach CA 92649 178-481-06 930-91-011 Ruth Magnotte Tr Edward F & Merilyn Simonin B-56 Box 203 16028 Mariner Dr Surfside CA 90743 Huntington Beach CA 92649 178-481-10 930-90-019 Jon H Regnier Paid Exchange II 16204 Surfside Ave 501 Park Center Seal Beach CA 92663 Santa Ana CA 92649 178-481-01 930-90-022 William C Bruton Michael M. Evasovic 16184 Surfside Ave 15994 Mariner Dr Seal Beach CA 92663 Huntington Beach CA 92649 178-481-04 930-91-003 Margarite V Atukovich Swingle, Richard et al 16190 Surfside Ave 10232 St. Bernard Seal Beach CA 92663 Cypress CA 90630 178-481-08 930-91-006 Moe Bruce V Tr Pearson Dorothea J Tr 16200 Surfside Ave 16010 Mariner Dr Seal Beach CA 92663 Huntington Beach CA 92649 178-481-14 930-91-009 Michael J & MaYy Farrell Nicolson Garth F Tr 16212 Surfside Ave B-47 16020 Mariner Dr Seal Beach CA 92663 Huntington Beach CA 92649 1 930-91-001 78-481-09 . ,Pamela A Mac Donald Helena L Herning15996 Mariner Dr 1 16202 Surfside Ave Huntington Beach CA 92649 Seal Beach CA 92663 178-481-12 930-91-004 William H & Victoria Sawtelle Wendell D Brawn 16208 Surfside Ave 16006 Mariner Dr Seal Beach CA 92663 Huntington Beach CA 92649 930-91-007 178-471-19. ' Strong Marguerite 0 Tr Nick Agosta 8-71 PO Box 355 16016 Mariner Dr \ - Huntington Beach CA 92649 Surfside CA 90743 --- ---------- --- I ,_-,� 930-91-010 <, 178-471-23 i Michael J Kondas Hildreth Bradrick 16022 Mariner Dr 65-B Surfside `� `3 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Surfside CA 90743 178-481-32 930-91-013 Joseph & Margaret Rullo Edwin Snyder 48-A Surfside 5375 Avenida Encinas #A Seal Beach CA 90743 Carlsbad CA 92009 930-91-014 178-481-35 Dale F Dowis Donald M Brawn 16034 Mariner Dr PO Box 441 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Surfside CA 90743 930-91-017 178-481-41 Robert B & Carolyn Wells Eugene G Salegui 16044 Mariner Dr 57 Surfside Ave Huntington Beach CA 92649 Surfside CA 90743 930-91-020 178-471-17 Richard K Davis Nolan W Cramer 16054 Mariner Dr PO Box 475 B-73 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Surfside CA 90743 930-91-023 178-471-21 Frank L & Sandra Nunes Sam R. & Greta Kennedy PO Box 174 PO Box 394 Midway City Ck 92655 Surfside CA 90743 930-91-015 John H Runkel 16040 Mariner Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 78-481-36 178-472-21 Donald G Anderson Brunn John P 16203 Sufside Ave PO Box 236 Seal Beach CA 92663 Surfside CA 90743 178-481-39 178-581-15 Charles R. Currey Esq. Vallabhbhai K Patel 1851 E lst St 16196 Coast Hwy Ste. 800 Huntington Beach CA 92651 Santa Ana CA 92705 178-481-42 178-472-19 Murrey & Sue Seidner Robert J & Rebecca Kendrick 16191 Surside Ave A-64 Seal Beach CA 92663 Surfside CA 90743 178-471-18 178-472-22 Virginia C Boggs William P Uniack PO Box 737 PO Box 188 Bellflower CA 90706 Surfside CA 90743 178-471-22 178-581-16 Elizabeth H Erskins Fred Hadjian 2667 DER6y 16182 Coast Hwy Berkeley CA 94705 Huntington Beach CA 92651 178-481-34 178-471-19 Alex Meruelo Nick Agosta 16207 Surfside Ave B-71 Seal Beach CA 90743 PO Box 355 Surfside CA 90743 178-481-37 178-471-23 Hampton F Tedder Hildreth Bradrick 16201 Surfside Ave 65 Surfside Ct B Seal Beach CA 90743 Surfside CA 90743 178-481-40 178-481-32 Gustavus C Bird Joseph & Margaret Rullo A-56 48-A Surfside Surfside CA 90743 Seal Beach CA 90743 178-481-44 178-481-35 Youngsma Peter 0 Donald M Brown 16187 Surfside Ave PO Box 441 Seal Beach CA 92663 Surfside CA 90743 178-472-17 178-481-41 Robert J. Herron Eugene G. Salegui PO Box 258 A-57 Surfside Ave Surfside CA 90743 Surfside CA 90743 1787471-24 Pres. H.B. Hist Society Anna M Artukovic C/0 Newland House Museum PO Box 192 19820 Beach Blvd Surfside CA 90743 Huntington Beach- CA 92648 178-481-39 Chairperson Charles R Currey Historical Resources Bd 18516 - 1st Street Comm Services Dept Suite 800 2000 Main St Santa Ana CA 92705 Huntington Beach Ck 92648 178-471-18 930-910-02 Virginia C Boggs King Kenneth P PO Box 787 19396 Woodlands Lane Bellflower CA 90706 Huntington Beach CA 92649 178-471-22 - 178-481-11 ~' Elizabeth H Erskine Millard, Maurice TR 2667 Derby 4312 Beeman Ave. Berkeley CA 94705 Studio City CA 91604 178-481-40 178-481-33 Gustavus C Bird A-56 Michael B Mattingley Surfside CA 90743 A-49 Surfside Ave Surfside CA 90743 President 178-481-15 H.B. Chamber of Commerce Arthur & Jo Galucci 2213 Main St. #32 B-46 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Surfside CA 90743 Board President 930-90-07 H.B./F.V. Board of Realtors Joseph, Rueben TR 8101 Slater Ave. 10207 Babbitt Ave. Huntington Beach CA 92647 Northridge, CA 91325 930-900-08 930-900-10 Eric A Baker TR Jasper. Mark F 16441 S Pacific Ave 1711 Camino Primavera Sunset Beach CA 90742 Bakersfield CA 93306 930-900-02 DHT Properties, LTD C/O California Federal Bank PO Box 60093 City of Industry, CA 91899 178-481-38 930-910-19 V.L. Denny McGuire Richard PO Box 179 PO Box 131 Surfside CA 90743 Susent Beach, CA 90742 VSLT6 VJ xxea Aaxa uow anV xooTTM OOZT uogsnoH D abxoaD TZO-T6-086 6V 9Z 6 VD uoeaa uo-4bu.4unH - ._.: xQ xauixeYl 9t,09T xy C T 'J �za 8T0-T6-006 930-91-012 Bauler Arthur Tr 16030 Mariner Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 93d-90-020 Vincent Kenny 15986 Mariner Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 sm - tSLT6 vo }[avd 49a;9WON 9AV XCOTTM OOZT uo,4snoH D abaoaD TZO-T6-CE6 6V9Z6 AID uoEaa uo4bu?qunH .zQ xauz_nys 9V09T zs a TAD ueuq gTa 8T0-T6-OE6 930-91-012 Bauler Arthur Tr 16030 Mariner Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 930-90-020 Vincent Kenny 15986 Mariner Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach �.; ,• „-`T._.' Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 ♦ '' JAi`J2' `'-i3 z = i Huntington Beach, CA 92648 s <� e p n a' ^ , r t. '—'' +x' - MUST CEO Box. Stephen Sutherland .7131 Pacific Suns Beach, CA ��NTINGTp�, O�r� 'ti p O hO _\NCOfl POflA OQ c�NNTI t LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING "' 0 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date February 16, 1993 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator J Prepared by: Michael Adams, Director of Community Develos t Subject: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 92-17 Consistent with Council Policy? Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, 370 STATEMENT OF ISSUE• Consideration of an appeal of the Planning Commission' s denial of Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-17, a request to provide a second driveway and parking area at a commercial/office site adjacent to Pacific Coast Highway. RECOMMENDATION• Motion to: "Continue the hearing to the March 1, 1993 City Council meeting. " ANALYSIS: This appeal was continued from the February 1, 1993 City Council meeting to February 16, 1993 due to re-notification of the public hearing requirements . The property owner ' s representative has requested further continuance to the March 1, 1993 City Council meeting (See Attachment No. 1) . ATTACHMENTS: rn 1 . Applicant ' s letter 2 . RCA dated February 1, 1993 q m MTU:MA:JM: lp m O x>'r"M (5870d) a ca L PIO 5/85 m J 2P3 ATTACHMENT NO.�_ REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date Fehr„;rg 1 _ 1 g q I Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator A Prepared by: Michael Adams, Director _of Community Developmen Subject:_ APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 92-17 �N .� ,hI/`CC� /93 Heuri sr 7- Consistent with Council Policy? L4 Yes [ ] New Policy or ExceptionZ,,K p�;q„��✓ �iti Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Transmitted for City Council consideration is an appeal by Fred Hadjian of the Planning Commission' s denial of Conditional Exception (Variance) No . 92-17, a . request to provide a second driveway and parking area at a commercial/office site. The conditional exception (variance) is necessary because there will be no internal circulation between the existing on-site parking area and the proposed parking area with driveway;. and the proposed drive aisle is 10 ' in width in lieu of minimum 20 ' . As a result, vehicles must enter a public street in. order, to progress from one parking area to another within the same development. Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-17 was originally denied by the Zoning Administrator on May 27, 1992 and subsequently appealed to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission upheld the Zoning Administrator ' s action by denying the request on December 1, 1992 . The applicant is seeking to overturn the Planning Commission' s denial because the driveway existed when the property was purchased and the elimination of the driveway results in loss of property values . RECOMMENDATION Planning. Commission and Staff Recommendation: Motion to: "Deny the appeal and uphold the Planning Commission' s denial of Conditional Exception (Variance) No . 92-17 with findings for denial . Planning Commission Action on December 1. 1992 : A MOTION WAS MADE BY RICHARDSON, SECOND BY SHOMAKER TO DENY THE APPEAL OF CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 92-17 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: ATTACHMENT NO.: AYES: Inglee, Bourguignon, Richardson, Shomaker, . Dettloff, Leipzig NOES: None ABSENT: Newman . ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED ANALYSIS• Proiect- Request: Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-7 has been initiated because the proposal does not comply with the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, Article. 960, Off-Street _Parkina and Landscaninq in the following areas: 1. Section ,9601.2 specifies that all off-street parking spaces shall have access to a public street or alley, and shall have internal circulation, safe entrances and exits, drives, and aisles in conformance with City standards. Traffic circulation shall be designed so that no vehicle need enter a public street in order to progress from one (1) aisle to any other aisle within the same development. The applicant is requesting a second driveway and parking area that does not provide internal circulation and safe ingress or egress as vehicles entering the driveway must perform a three point turn-around or exit the; same direction. Vehicles must. then enter- Pacific Coast Highway to travel to the other drive aisle for additional parking i opportunities on the site. In addition, the driveway is not wide enough to accommodate two (2) vehicles at one time and, therefore, does meet the circulation design section of the Huntington teach Ordinance Code. The code requires minimum 20 feet and only 10 feet is proposed. Coastal Status : This project is located in the Coastal Zone but may be categorically _ excluded from coastal development permits pursuant to Section . . 989 . 5.3. 13(g) , which exempts minor variances that do not negatively_ impact coastal access or view corridors, from coastal development permits . This variance request for a driveway and parking area that does . not provide internal circulation on the site does not negatively impact coastal access or coastal views as none is currently provided. •� RCA 1/19/.93, ._ -2- (5397d) Project History: Use Permit No. 90-18 and Conditional Exception (Variance) No 90-19 , submitted by the applicant, for an exterior facade improvement to an existing 2, 541 square- feet office/commercial building were conditionally approved by the Zoning Administrator on June 20, 1990. At .that time, vehicles could enter the property. from Pacific Coast Highway on either side of the building because the property was not improved to current- code standards; there were no curbs, gutters or sidewalks. The conditional exception (variance) permitted a reduced landscape planter adjacent to a public right-of-way (PCH) for a larger parking area to accommodate enough parking stalls, and a reduction to the minimum turning radius requirement (23 feet in lieu of 26 feet) . The approved plans depicted a single driveway to the'-north of the building and the southerly area was depicted as landscaping and outdoor recreation area. Basis for approval of the variance was due to the fact that the layout, with one driveway and an open space area, . complied with code. The applicant has not yet brought the project into conformance with the approved plans as there is a second driveway and the proper landscaping has not been installed. The property owner was cited by Code Enforcement for non-compliance with the conditions of approval of Use ' Permit No. 90-18 and Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 90-19 and required to remove the second driveway. The property owner then submitted Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-17 as a request to allow the second driveway to remain. He stated at the time of the 1990 submittal, he did not realize the approved site plan did not include the southeasterly driveway. The Zoning Administrator denied the current request on May 27, 1992 (see attached minutes) and again required removal of the second driveway in accordance. with the originally approved plan. It was denied because the additional driveway for one (1) parking space off a major arterial (Pacific Coast Highway) without on-site, internal circulation would: 1. Create potential conflicts between vehicles, -bicyclists and pedestrians along Pacific Coast Highway; 2. Constitute a special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon properties in the vicinity because other parcels have typically only one (1) point of vehicular ingress and egress; and 3 . Eliminate landscaping and open space area that was used to justify a previously approved variance for reduced planter width W 6" in lieu of 10" ) between a parking area and Pacific Coast Highway. The denial has been appealed to the Planning Commission and now to the City Council . RCA 1/19/93 . -3- (5397d) � ATTACHMENT NO. Analysis: Staff recommends that the City Council uphold the Zoning Administrator ' s and the Planning Commission' s action and deny the appeal because of the reasons cited by the Zoning Administrator. The lack of internal circulation between the two drive aisles results in double loading and traffic conflicts with Pacific Coast Highway. The goals of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code Article 960, Parking includes reducing the points of ingress and egress along streets and arterials and ensuring safe traffic circulation. In addition, the southeasterly driveway does not meet the minimum 30 feet driveway width typically required by Caltrans as it is only 18 feet wide at Pacific Coast Highway. The applicant must also obtain a permit. from Caltrans for the second driveway accesw% `The 18 foot width is barely one-half (1/2) of the Caltrans requirement. . Also, the actual driveable portion of the access way on the property itself is further reduced to ten (10) feet wide. Twenty feet is required for drive aisles such as this. The City' s Public Works Engineering Division recommends denial of this request because the potential for vehicle and traffic conflicts is great in this area as the drive can only accommodate one (1) car at a time for one-way travel. It is highly possible that first time visitors to the site will enter the driveway while another car is already there and then be forced to back-out onto Pacific Coast Highway. This situation results in an awkward traffic pattern which would be very confusing to a motorist unfamiliar with the site. Vehicles entering commercial sites should be able to travel to additional parking areas at the same area if a parking space is not available. The applicant' s appeal letter states that the southeasterly driveway is necessary because the trash enclosure can not be properly located on the north side of the property as previously required. The Zoning Administrator' s action on May 27, 1992 included the provision to relocate the trash enclosure to the south side of the building but prohibited vehicular access . A small concrete pathway from the trash enclosure to Pacific Coast Highway would allow the trash bin to be rolled down to the street as Rainbow Dispds'al requires . Another point of the appeal letter is that the addition of a parking space on the south side of the building brings the site into conformance with the number of parking spaces required by code. However, the nine (9) spaces currently provided on-site is consistent with the parking code that was in effect at the time of project approval. The tenth parking space is not necessary to bring the site into compliance and the potential conflict and hazardous circulation of the second access outweigh the benefits of gaining one (1) parking space. a RCA 1/19/93 -4- (5397d) There is a feasible alternative to the driveway access on Pacific Coast Highway that the property owner could pursue which would comply with code. An on-site access easement between the property to the southeast, a motel, and the office building driveway would allow access to the tenth parking space while reducing traffic conflicts on Pacific Coast Highway. This would achieve the applicant 's goal as well as comply with City' s circulation and driveway standards. The adjacent lot contains a drive aisle that terminates at the southeasterly property line. No driveway .would be necessary -off Pacific Coast Highway and the majority of landscaping area would be preserved. Summary: In conclusion, staff recommends denial -of the appeal because: 1. There is a lack of on-site circulation; 2. It will create potential ingress and egress conflicts on an arterial highway; 3 . The driveway width is only 18 feet in width (27' minimum is required by the city) which is not wide enough to accommodate adequate maneuverability into and out from the site; 4 . The on-site drive aisle is substandard (10 ' in lieu of 20 ' ) ; 5. It will result in a loss of on-site landscaping and open space area pursuant to a previously approved use permit which justified a variance in conjunction with the use permit; and 6. There is a design option available to the applicant which is to access the southerly portion of the site from an adjoining lot. that contains a drive aisle terminating at the common property line. Alternative Action: Should the City Council overturn the Planning Commission' s action and approve Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-17, staff suggests a condition of approval to minimize potential traffic impacts . Staff recommends that the applicant designate the southeasterly drive as a private accessway and install a mechanized security gate across the driveway. The gate should be setback approximately eighteen (18) feet from the curbline so that it is visible from Pacific Coast Highway but allows a vehicle to wait. while the gate opens. In addition, a sign shall be installed at the front of the property to identify the driveway as "Private-No Entry" . This option should help reduce traffic conflicts by preventing traffic other than authorized vehicles from entering the drive aisle. It is recommended that the gate be a rolling wrought iron structure approximately forty-two (42") inches high and painted white to match the building trim. It should be noted that ultimate approval of this driveway approach is subject to Caltrans approval because it is along Pacific Coast Highway. RCA 1/19/93 -5- (5397d) ATTACHMENT NO. _____ Environmental Status: This project is categorically. exempt pursuant to the CEQA. EMING Not Applicable. AILTERNATIVE ACTION: The City Council may overturn the Planning Commission's action on December 1, 1992 by approving Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-17 with findings and conditions of approval (see -Attachment No. 5� . ATTACHMENTS. 1. Area Map 2. Findings for Denial 3. Letter of Appeal dated December 9, 1992 4. Planning Commission Staff Report dated December 1, 1992 5.- Alternati.ve .Findings and Conditions of Approval. - MTU:MA:JMilp RCA 1/19/93 -6- (5397d) " q W �r J • y / a A ` e • .p t ` PACIFIC OCEAN .. r xna a rear J j m CE 92-17 •�, HutMNGTON BEACH HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION ATTACHMENT NO. 2 FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCEI NO. 92-17: 1. Since the subject. property can be fully developed within regular established setbacks, such a conditional exception for an additional driveway along Pacific Coast Highway for the existing office building and with no on-site internal circulation is not necessary. for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights. The renovation of the existing commercial building, approved under Use Permit No. 90-18 and Conditional Exception No. 90-19, complied with the parking requirements based on the code at that time. The additional Vftiveway, has the potential to create additional vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian conflicts along Pacific Coast Highway. The additional parking space does not warrant the conflicts between vehicles entering and exiting the site, and reduction in landscaping. In addition, there is a design option available to the applicant which is to access the southerly portion of the site from an adjoining lot. 2. Granting of Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-17 for an additional driveway along Pacific Coast Highway for the existing office building and with no on-site, internal circulation between the two parking areas would constitute a special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon properties in the vicinity. Other parcels along Pacific Coast Highway in the vicinity have only one point of ingress and egress (driveway) . 3 . Exceptional circumstances do not apply that deprive the subject • property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the same zone classifications. 4 . Although the property is irregular in configuration, the proposed driveway access on the southerly property line will create a hazardous situation with vehicular ingress and egress and northbound traffic on Pacific Coast Highway. 5. The proposed driveway would create awkward circulation movements on-site and cause potential ingress and egress conflicts on an arterial highway. The driveway width is only 18 feet in width (27 ' minimum is required by the city) which is not wide enough . to accommodate adequate two-way maneuvering into and out from the site. 6. The driveway will result in a loss of on-site landscaping and open space area pursuant a previously approved use permit which -justified a variance for reduced planter width (1 ' 6" in lieu of 10 ' ) along Pacific Coast Highway next to the northerly parking area. (5397d-7) Fred Hadjian 16182 Pacific Coast Hwy. Huntington Beach, Ca . 92648 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street o Z Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 LID Attn: Honorable Mayor and City Council N n�rr' c Re: Appeal of Planning Commission action on : .-4n December 1 , 1992, regarding Conditional -v s a Exception (Variance) No. 92-17. M � L'O T Dear Honorable Mayor Winchell : N By this letter, I am appealing the Planning Commission action taken on December 1 , 1992, in the above referenced matter. As background information . I am enclosing a copy of the original narrative I submitted to the Zoning Administration on May 20, 1992 . and also the letter dated June 5, 1992 , I submitted to the Planning Commission appealing the Zoning Administrator's denial . As I have indicated in the attached letter , I had two driveways when I purchased the property. I decided to improve my property by renovating the interior by remodeling the bathrooms , installing new drywall , doors, ceiling and paint . The exterior was also completely renovated including new stucco, windows , awnings, and doors . I did not add square footage. In doing this work, I had to get a. conditional use permit which required that I .also install landscaping, redo my parking lot , remove the septic tank and connect to the City sewer system and pay' the fees , dedicate seven feet of my property to the City along Pacific Coast Highway and construct curb, gutter and sidewalk and get all the permits from the City of Huntington Beach and Caltrans . I did not realize that when these plans were drawn , my driveway on the east side of my building was eliminated. This driveway has been a part of this property for over forty years , and Just because I wanted to improve my property, to increase its value and make it more compatible with the surrounding area , I have lost a driveway which reduces the value of my property. I do not think that this is fair , and I believe that a property right I had when I purchased the property has been denied to me. This elimination of a driveway and a parking space reduced the value of my property. If I had not decided to improve my property, I A Chi v City of Huntington Beach -2- December 9 . 1992 Honorable .Mayor & City Council would still have my driveway and seven more feet of property that I have already given to the City of Huntington Beach. At this point I have already spent $100.000 on the improvements I 've made and I still have $50.000 to spend to complete these. I respectfully request that the City Council overturn the decision of the Planning Commission and approve my request to have my driveway back_ Very truly yours, �yu Fred Hadjian sc `4 may Zu,. i yyL ipyNARRATIVE FOR CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE)" FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 16182 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY The subject property is located on the north side of. Pacific Coast Highway just east of Mariner Drive. The property to the north is occupided by carports for the Huntington MarAna- Condominiums. The property to the west is a planter area and entrance to the Huntington Marina Condominiums. The property to the east is occupied by the Ocean View Motel. The property on the south side of Pacific Coast Highway is residential. This application requests that a second drivaway be allowed to be installed on the east side of the building as shown on Exhibit "A" . The applicant has been working "on -site improvements on this property since 1990. Prior to that, this property had two driveways, but due to the property's unusual size and the building site location on the property, it is impossible to maintain circulation on-site. On a previous Use Permit Application, the eastern driveway was eliminate&and as a result, the trash enclosure and parking space had to be eliminated. The trash enclosure was relocated on the westerly parking lot and a new parking plan was approved which allowed for nine parking spaces including one. handicapped space. This conformed to the parking requirements at that time, which were one parking space per each 300 square feet of building area. Current parking standards in this area require one space for each 250 square feet of building area or in this case, ten parking spaces. t ' I I, Also, the applicant has been told by Rainbow Disposal that a building of this size requires a three yard trash receptical at a minimum. This will require an enclosure of a minimum of 618" by 818" . See attached copy of trash enclsure size which was given to the applicant by Rainbow Disposal. The current site plan only has nine parking spaces .and will not accommodate a trash enclosure of the size required. A trash enclosure of—the size required cannot be installed in the westerly parking lot without either eliminating a parking space or blocking the handicapped access to the building. In order for the applicant to fully utilize his property to . the highest and best use, it is requested that he- be allowed to reconstruct the driveway on the east side of his building. This will enable him to have one more parking space, thus bringing his site up-toy-code .and also providing an area suitable for a trash enclosure of the size required. This additional driveway will. not have on-site circulation to the existing parking lot and driveway on the western side of the building. It is possible,' however, for a vehicle to drive in, turn around, and exit safely unto Pacific Coast Highway. Even if a car is parking,. in the single parking space, a car can drive in, turn around and exit safely. Public safety will be maintained by stripping and .providing signs as shown in Exhibit "A" . A video has also been made which clearly shows one car entering and parking and another car entering, turning around and exiting while the first car is still parked. �_V vISPOS,14 O 00300 c0 x PO. BOX 1026 • HUNTINGMN BEACH, CA 92647 • PH: (714) 1147.3581 FAX: (714) 841-4660 TELECOPITR COVER 10MER . DATE: TIME: PHONE $s �� """ ' L¢.3 Z-2. TO s ' FROMs RAINBOW. DISPOSAL COMPANY INC RE: •$ h TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES ,. _, (INCLUDING THIS PAGE). ~ REMARKS: ag 1305 NOTICE: THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE . OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO 1'71HICH IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL, AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE . UNDER APPLICABLE LAW. THANK YOU. IF - YOU ARE NOT RECEIVING OUR COPIES, PLEASE INFORM US Ib!MEDIATELY. OUR NUMBER IS 714-847-3581. OUR FAX NUMBER IS 714-841-4660 . Comm-4 pa Ar Pew -MA lap �-�- � ° o � ��'�` �• :� ter• s �...� A� - wre pae-c.atts �d�C•Ct�f� - �.. ` COW L L_� D wnu c kV i5i l TF . 5: LL`� iiAL.L' t1 D I�d isr�t. R 15 Fred Hadjian COO 16182 Pacific Coast Hwy. Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 June 5, 1992 City of Huntington Beach ' P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach, Ca.92648 Attn: Executive Secretary of the Planning Commission Re: Appeal of Zoning Administrator's denial, of Conditional .Exception No. 92-17 Dear Madam: On. May 20, 1992, the Zoning. Administrator of- the City of Huntington Beach, Mr. Scott Hess, denied Conditional Exception No. 92-17. I am hereby appealing Mr. Hess's action. The request which was denied was to allow my existing driveway on the east side of my buildings to remain .open at 16182 Pacific Coast- Highway and to allow for the trash enclosure .and one parking space to be placed in the area served_by. this driveway. When I purchased the property,. I had two driveways; one on the east side and one on the west side of .my building. My building was too close to my rear property line to have circulation between them. In 1990, a site plan was prepared for Use Permit 90-18 and Conditional-'Exception No. 90-19. This site plan was approved. I wasn' t' aware that the driveway was eliminated and therefore, I did not appeal. I do not want to lose my driveway. It will only be used by one car because there is only one parking- space and it will not create a. traffic . hazard. The closest driveway to the east is 350 feet away and :my .other driveway to the west is 100 feet away. I do not think by keeping my driveway, it will create a significant traffic hazard. I need my driveway because I only have nine spaces now, and the code requires ten. Also I need my driveway because the trash enclosure as .shown on the existing approved site plan will prevent the handicapped access to my building. The trash enclosure should be on the east side of my building where it has always been. The Rainbow Disposal Co. does not drive into the driveways along Pacific Coast Highway, so my driveway on the east side of my building would only be used to roll the trash bin in and out. This will be better than the way .it is now because the trash bin has to be rolled out through the driveway on the west side of my building which interferes with the .traffic in and. out of my customers' parking area. I feel that I am being deprived of -my rights just because of the fact that my building was built over forty years ago too close to my rear property line . and therefore, --I cannot connect my east and west parking areas with on-site circulation. I want to have the opportunity to appeal this to the Planning Commission. Very truly yours, Fred Hadjian huntington beach department of community development. STAff REPORT EXECUTIVE SiJNIIKARY DECEMBER .1. 1992 APPEAL OF ZONING ADMINISTRATOR' S DENIAL OF CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO, 92-17 (16182 Pacific Coast Highway) — This is an appeal of the Zoning Administrator' s denial of a request to add a second driveway to an existing commercial/office site. The driveway requires a conditional exception (variance) because there is no internal vehicular circulation between the new driveway and the existing main driveway on the site. The request also includes the provision of an additional parking space and relocation of the existing trash enclosure. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission uphold the Zoning Administrator' s action and deny the conditional exception (variance) because it increases the points of ingress/egrees on Pacific Coast Highway, it does not meet Caltran' s minimum driveway width requirement of 30 feet, vehicles must enter Pacific Coast Highway to travel to the other side of the site, and it results in unsafe circulation. In addition, the new parking space is not necessary to be considered in conformance with the parking code and the trash enclosure may be relocated to the south site without also providing complete vehicular access . 13 ATTACHMENT NO. _. ,`1Q - A-PL•F7k23D TO: Planning Commission FROM: Community Development DATE: December 1, 1992 SUBJECT: APPEAL OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR' S DENIAL OF CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 92-17 APPLICANT/ APPELLANT/ PROPERTY Fred Hadjian, 16182 Pacific Coast Highway, OWNER: Huntington Beach, CA 92648 REQUEST: This is an appeal of the Zoning Administrator ' s denial of Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-17 which is a request to add a second driveway access from Pacific Coast Highway without on-site, internal circulation between parking areas of an existing commercial site. The request also includes the provision of an additional parking space and relocation of the existing trash enclosure. LOCATION: 16182 Pacific Coast Highway DATE ACCEPTED: June 6, . 1992 ZONE: VSC-CZ (Visitor Serving Commercial-Coastal Zone) GENERAL PLAN: Commercial-Visitor Serving EXISTING USE: Office Building ACREAGE: . 17 acres 1 .0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Motion to : "Uphold the Zoning Administrator ' s action by denying the appeal of Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-17 with findings for denial . " 2 .0 GENERAL INFORMATION: This is an appeal of the Zoning Administrator ' s denial of Conditional Exception (Variance_) No. 92-17 which is a request to add a second driveway access from Pacific Coast Highway to an existing office building. �u Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-7 has been initiated because the proposal does not comply with the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code Article 960, Off-Street Parking and Landscaping in the following area 1. Section 9601.2 specifies that all off-street parking spaces shall have access to a public street or alley, and shall have internal circulation, safe entrances and exits, drives, and aisles in conformance with City standards. Traffic circulation shall be designed so that no vehicle need enter a public street in order to progress from one (1) aisle to any other aisle within the same development. The applicant is requesting a second driveway that. does not provide internal circulation and safe ingress or egress as vehicles entering the driveway must perform a three point turn-around or exit the same direction. Vehicles must then enter Pacific Coast Highway to travel to the other drive aisle for additional parking opportunities on the site. In addition, the driveway is not wide enough to accommodate two (2) vehicles at one time and, therefore, does meet the circulation design section of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. The code requires minimum 20 feet. and only 10 feet is proposed. 3 . 0 SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS: North of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: High Density Residential ZONE: R4-CZ (High Density Residential-Coastal Zone) LAND USE: Condominiums East and West of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Visitor ' Serving Commercial ZONE: VSC-CZ (Visitor Serving Commercial- Coastal Zone) LAND USE: Retail Office . South of Subject Property: LAND USE: Pacific Coast Highway and Pacific Ocean 4 . 0. ENVI-RO,NMENTAL STATUS: i < The proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to Class 5, Section 15305 of the California Environmental Quality Act. `' Staff Report - 12/1/92 -2- (5147d) 5 . 0 COASTAL STATUS: This project is located in the Coastal Zone but may be categorically excluded from coastal development permits pursuant to Section 989 . 5.3 . 13(g) , which exempts minor variances that do not negatively impact coastal access or view corridors, from coastal development permits. This variance is a request for a driveway that does note provide internal circulation on. the site which does. not negatively impact coastal access or coastal views as none is currently provided. 6.0 REDEVELOPMENT STATUS: Not applicable. 7. 0 SPECIFIC PLAN: Not applicable. 8 .0 SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE: Not applicable. 9 .0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: Project History Use Permit No. 90718 and Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 90-19, submitted:by the applicant, for an exterior facade improvement to an existing 2,541 square feet office/commercial building were conditionally approved by the Zoning Administrator on June 2,0, 1990. At that time, vehicles could enter the property from Pacific Coast .Highway on either side of the building. The conditional exception permitted a reduced landscape planter adjacent to a public right-of-way for a larger parking area to accommodate enough parking stalls, and a reduction to the minimum turning radius requirement (23 feet in lieu of 26 feet) .The approved plans depicted a single driveway to the north of the building and the southerly area depicted as landscaping and outdoor recreation area. Basis for approval of' the request was due to the fact that the layout, with one driveway and an open space area, complied with code. The .applicant has not. yet brought the project into conformance with the approved plans as there is a second driveway and the proper landscaping has not been installed. The property owner was cited by Code Enforcement for non-compliance with the conditions of approval of Use Permit No . 90-18 and Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 90-19 and required to remove the second driveway. The property owner then submitted Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-17 as a request to allow the second driveway to remain. He stated at that time that he did not realize the approved site plan did not include the southeasterly driveway. The Zoning Administrator denied the request on May 27, 1992 (see attached minutes) and again required removal of the second driveway. It was denied because the additional driveway for one (1) parking space off a major arterial (Pacific Coast Highway) without on-site, internal circulation would: 1. Create potential conflicts between vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians along Pacific Coast Highway; Staff Report - 12/1/92 -3- (5147d) , 2 . . Constitute a special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon properties in the vicinity because other parcels have typically only one ( 1) point cf vehicular ingress and egress; andle 3 . Eliminate landscaping and open space area that was used to jusitfy a previously approve variance for reduced planter width ( 1 ' 6" in lieu of 10 ' ) between a parking area and Pacific Coast Highway. The denial has been appealed to the Planning Commission. Analysis Staff recommends that the Planning Commission uphold the Zoning Administrator ' s action and deny the appeal because of the reasons cited by the Zoning Administrator. The lack of internal circulation between the two drive aisles results in double loading and traffic conflicts with Pacific Coast Highway. The goals of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code Article 960, Parking includes reducing the points of ingress and egress along streets and arterials and ensuring safe traffic circulation. In addition, the southeasterly . driveway does not meet the minimum 30 feet driveway width typically required by Caltrans as it is only 18 feet wide at Pacific .Coast Highway. The applicant .must also obtain a permit from Caltrans for the second driveway access . The 18 foot width is barely one-half (1/2) of the Caltrans requirement . Also, the actual driveable portion of the access way on the property itself is further reduced to ten (10) feet wide. Twenty feet is required for drive aisles such as this . The potential for vehicle and traffic conflicts is great in this area as the drive can only accommodate one (1) car at a time for one-way travel . It. is highly possible that first time visitors to the site will enter the driveway while another car is already there and then be forced to back-out onto Pacific Coast Highway. _ This situation results in an awkward traffic pattern which would be very confusing to a motorist unfamiliar with the site. Vehicles entering commercial sites should be able to travel to additipnal parking areas at the same area if a parking space is not available. The City' s Public Works Engineering Division recommends denial of this request . The applicant ' s. appeal letter states that the southeasterly driveway is necessary because the trash enclosure can not be properly located on the north side of the property as previously required. The Zoning Administrator ' s action on May 27, 1992 included the provision to relocate the trash enclosure. to the south side of the building but prohibited vehicular access . A small concrete pathway from the trash enclosure to Pacific Coast Highway would allow the trash bin to be rolled down to the street as Rainbow Disposal requires . Staff Report - 12/1/92 -4- (5147d) yam;« Another point of the appeal letter is. that the addition of a parking ; space on the south side of the building brings the site into conformance with the number of parking spaces required by code. However, the nine (9) spaces currently provided on-site is consistent with the parking code that was in effect at the time of project approval. The. tenth parking space is not- necessary to bring the site into compliance and the potential conflict and hazardous circulation of the second access outweigh the benefits of gaining'. :,..'... one (1) parking space. There is .a feasible alternative -to the driveway access on Pacific Coast Highway that the property owner could pursue.— An on-site access easement between the property to the southeast, a motel, and the office building driveway would allow access to the tenth parking space while reducing traffic conflicts on Pacific Coast Highway. This would achieve the applicant's goal as well as comply with City' s circulation and driveway standards. The adjacent lot contains a drive aisle that terminates at the southeasterly property - line. No driveway would be necessary off Pacific Coast Highway and the majority of landscaping area would be preserved. In conclusion, staff recommends denial of the appeal because: 1. There is a lack of on-site circulation; 2. It will create potential ingress and egress conflicts on an arterial highway; 3 . The driveway width is only 18 feet in width (27 ' minimum is required by the city) which is not wide enough to accomodate adequate maneuverability into and out from the site; 4 . The on-site drive aisle is substandard (10 ' in lieu of 20 ' ) ; 5 . It will result in a loss of on-site landscaping and open space area pursuant to a previously approved use 'Permit which justified a variance in conjunction with the use permit; and 6 . There is design option available to the applicant which is to access the southerly portion of the site from an adjoining lot that contains a drive aisle terminating at the common property line. 20. 0 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission uphold the Zoning Administrator' s action and deny the appeal of Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-17 with the following findings : Y Staff Report - 12/1/92 -5- (5147d) FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO 92-17 1. Since the subject property can be fully developed within regular established setbacks, such a conditional exception for an additional driveway along Pacific Coast Highway for the existing office building and with no on-site internal circulation is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights. The renovation of the existing commercial building, approved under Use Permit No. 90-18 .and Conditional Exception No. 90-19, complied with the parking requirements, ' based on the code at that time. The additional driveway,`- has the .potential to create additional vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian conflicts along Pacific Coast Highway. . The . additional parking space does not warrant the conflicts between vehicles entering and exiting the site, and reduction in landscaping. In addition, there is a design option available to : the applicant which is to access the southerly portion of the site from an adjoining lot. 2. Granting of Conditional Exception (Variance) No. :92-17 for an additional driveway along Pacific Coast Highway for .the existing office building and with no on-site, internal circulation between the two parking areas would constitute a special privilege inconsistent with limitations "upon properties in the vicinity. Other parcels along Pacific Coast Highway in the vicinity have only one point of ingress and egress (driveway) . .3 . . Exceptional circumstances do not apply that deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the same zone classifications. 4 . Although the property is irregular in configuration, the proposed driveway access on the southerly property line will create a hazardous. situation with vehicular ingress and egress and northbound traffic on Pacific Coast Highway. 5. The proposed driveway would create awkward circulation movements on-site and cause potential ingress and egress conflicts on an arterial highway. The driveway width is only 18 feet in width (27 ' minimum is required by the city) which is not wide enough to accomodate adequate two-way maneurvering into and . out from the site. 6. The driveway will result in a loss of on-site landscaping and open space area pursuant a previously approved use permit which justified a variance for reduced planter width (1' 6" in lieu of 10 ' ) . along Pacific Coast Highway next to the northerly parking area . 11. 0 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The Planning Commission may overturn the Zoning Administrator ' s action and approve Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-17 with findings and suggested conditions of approval . Staff Report - 12/1/92 -6- (5147d) ATTACHMENTS: 1. Site plan dated November 23, 1992 2. Previously approved site plan (UP No. 90-18/CE No. 90-19) 3. Applicant ' s appeal letter dated June 5, 1992 4 . Zoning Administrator minutes dated May 27, 1992 SH:JM:kjl y. • Staff Report - 12/1/92 -7- (5147d) �z;.. LOT CO%ERACE STATISTICS ITEw AMA W Ff. PEACERIACE L) STE AMA 77b ,DD i OTytiVE z) IRMA09C FOOT PMT lrn ,7.E t ~� rwrea. TFAFR trLaoelRq f'•f-1 r•-r'. � 1) .ROUT 7E'\EAax(Ia•)IIOT Irn I7.7 x 4. IWI F[011lr(O r[F MrEM EYI'Or•t / EIQyE7E0«and aAiL . f t.wrwe Leo,...It ..) ►ARt«C AM IR A QRO«(, 71149 17.7 t A, TIIIIIE\r.Y7 �.REgt.e•wrown O 4. `— cl no".44 Alto N O uwtwp 1blR fw4o)Pt•wp L �, 1 / C OU w\OfD AMA . • / 1101 l•w0t f.0Y1 rM wt OYAgD AISf �� I EA 1. LOwrllLtf-Vltw N•weYY ACCf r. &) Drd Q e1 aAG11De U N. •7 17.E t iL I Aro w•w•et r..0 r�ilrawne A. so* (Arz) \aD x Qi 110.UM O[CR tcrrle•HA 1 1+ ` l EX ITEc [A R AR i `—may ND.FA IA l•RD.CYlO AVE. t 1 �1 / l.w,rw LOwLM,I AtlA ' 7 Y•L..t0•qw OwO I', D t exM No OFrMe NIUILDI04 PARKING a O r AA1wre 1Me ulA I.) uwnRe noa AREA :s.l SG IT. ljy tq:0 Memo q A •w iE L) rARK"Malman . IO.I •� A►rNOYEo ' = c .O ►ARRINO ARIA !•q.wo S) Oet,e7C►geOR . E O 'utq..l.•wr• • e.) rRaras[a rAR1afC I T _ YO� ceRwn ewwf . .S' 7Z.••�• XE •e T '1• n�e:.i: A.rwo.fe Age.dw A e D Y.worle LVF!.ovnf A• g rwEreae e.Nlwn 'E NOTES: d T [T071DIa rAR1OR'SPACES rROPOSW►AA71e1C SPACES IO sm -Dowtv Pmhalf.OR[Y - _ PACIFIC COAST HWY. _ e(� IM •EACR«C Mf 011 MMMAT«\OSVW f Tl © mrow am[x+ETrla oamemn © SM -M rAR,olq A"AAOlJM AREA 04LY. %OVMD 7NALL ROW ARa1rO• EACKM OUT OR MO1NAY FNV4'Ra' Z O,NQ IR[YM7 70rrE Isc-cz • MR.FRED MA"-f4fM C[IKNAI n•N D[pt}1A,Ri1 C-vf �y �'}' w cro.,C K.O. A.0 EXHIBIT 'A' IRegr161DN Of.CA,r]t•r ® LOAN CENTER SITE PLAN FOR aq..l.w.rla.Ngr fwrew RNC feRR i'gle' VARIANCE I.wf YT ruN e�..f. AwAF a Ne or,aF IR«lttlatON EGd C 01041A 92-867 A. I _..... N� TEMPORARY OENCIIMARK j '� ���� \G• ,-1aoulhAr-roR Tb vE.RIFV I:oeAnow o t DEPfH � To OF 3Ew�R gTERAL j � J•G P• Q �� IOR GoNrJEc.tION 15 0 •>3 Fa1GL•RE I �k1• •. '< 'J'.: 1 •'` jyy�`. -✓' tq ail R `. .9 •., .�� .. %/ ✓ tettwS.tl Ht .. 9 oH G!G.T0 I� ExlsT. AIR- ,.. aOj (Plioffsr; Ok! I tY C. S. -J" pub j Z /•/�� I t n• �'�'b' �' II 9 oT ��'�•� I SPADE' "�{ Y u :02 �. _�' 23.0' '� C,� 2 3n•- eXISf.G "•�• _ 20 �. X -.a � .e�,},�C:9y. ,OI ���.._... 3.Iil .� .(PRo•1'�L'f) 1 l � (/7��� � �•��' •� I` .�_-�_ �3�� h r r 1 o K od . M F —_��,',-`:.' �/,.. ti'11� —J---w 5}•\.`�� _..� i I: 14 +`e,C w�0' ..SY•, �'� '.l°i` • IG.$� 1'1.0' B !+' .'1 i.,.Gxl�• f1Lo' D i.S Il ExIS G T. 6O`wgLK L-ro RG11J►�� ��'� . ,� . w►,.L ��y I 94. i wrtxwAY of �Mo I — 4 get G II t �n orh• u•43 2,6'11 I `G. Uh / ' �a� .KMK T1t� — Q,0% wgTG J 'f'^Y EK,ST 14-R.L.P. STo R1� � OQ.e,y P. HAIL A. IS SEE 5TRE`T IMPRt VF-t- 6 -r ?L Ahws� E tl s'f. G� GAS lot I Fred Hadjian 16182 Pacific Coast Hwy. Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 June 5 , 1992 City of Huntington Beach P . 0 . Box 190 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 Attn : Etecutive Secretary of the Planning Commission Re : Appeal of Zoning Administrator ' s denial of Conditional Exception No . 92-17 Dear Madam: On May 20 , 1992 , the Zoning Administrator of the City of Huntington Beach, Mr . Scott Hess , denied Conditional Exception No . 92-17 . I am herebl appealing Mr . Hess ' s action . The request which was denied was to allow my existing driveway on the east side of my buildings to remain open at 16182 Pacific Coast Highway and to allow for the trash enclosure and one parking space to be placed in the area served by this driveway. When I purchased the property, I had two driveways; one on the east side and one on the west side of my building . My building was too close to my rear operty line to have circulation between them . In 1990 , a site plan w* t�pareci for Use Permit 90-16 and Coridit.ional Exception No . 90-19 . This site -plan was' approved, I wasn ' t aware that the driveway was eliminated and therefore , I did not appeal . I do not want . to lose my driveway . It will only be tised by one car because there is only one parking space and it will not create a traffic hazard. The closest driveway to the east is 350 feet away and my other driveway to the west 1s 100 feet away . I do not think by keeping my driveway, it will create a significant traffic hazard . I need my driveway because I only have nine spaces now, and the code requires ten. Also I need my driveway because the trash enclosure as shown on the existing approved site plan will prevent the handicapped access to my building . The trash enclosure should be on the east side of my building where it has always bee». The .Rainbow Disposal Co . does not drive into the driveways along Pacific Coast Highway, so ray driveway on the east side of my building would only be used to roll the trash bin in and out . This will be better than the way it is now because the trash bin has to be rolled out through the driveway on the west side of my building which interferes with the traffic in and out of my customers ' parking area. I feel that I am being deprived of my rights just because of the fact that my building was built over forty years ago too close to my rear property line and therefore I cannot connect my east and west parking areas with on-site circulation.. I want to have the opportunity to appea e to the Planning Coauaission . Very truly yours , Fred Hadjian�ATTACHMENT NO. TTF�ii�5: CONDITIONAL EXCE ION NO. 92-17 'Applicant: Fred Hadjian 16182 Pacific Coast Highway Huntington Beach, CA 926494 j quest : To approve a variance to allow a second driveway to the commercial site which would prohibit interior circulation from one driveway to another pursuant to Section 9601. 2 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code . The request includes providing an additional parking space and relocation of the existing trash enclosure. Location: 16182 Pacific Coast Highway Wayne Carvalho, Staff Planner, reported that a Use Permit for exterior facade improvements and interior alterations was approved on the subject property two years .ago. The applicant is requesting a variance to allow a second driveway off Pacific Coast Highway which would allow vehicular access south of the building . Staff indicated that the Department of Public Works and Community Development were opposed to the request . Staff concluded by recommending denial with findings . THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Dick Cahl, representing the applicant, indicated that when the Use Permit was approved in 1990 , the applicant did not understand that southerly driveway was required to be eliminated and replaced landscaping . He further stated that the Rainbow Disposal pany is requiring a larger trash container . However, the approved sh. location• was not adequate in space, and would require taking up an additional required parking space . Joan Peoples , representing the homeowners association directly to the north of the property, spoke in opposition to the request . She indicated that the property owner did not comply, with several conditions imposed as a result of the use permit approval . She also stated that the second entrance creates a very hazardous situation . Fred Hadajian, applicant , advised that the two driveways were at that location for forty years . He bought the property and had spent a lot of money improving it and now felt he was being punished by the City. There were no other persons present to speak for or against the request and the public hearing was closed . Scott Hess., Zoning Administrator , stated that he would allow the trash container to be placed on the south side of the building but would prohibit vehicular access and installation of a driveway. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 92-17 WAS DENIED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS. THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR ED THAT THE ACTION TAKEN BY .THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR CAN BE ED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION WITHIN TEN CALENDAR (10) DAYS. ZA Minutes - 5/27/92 -7-ATTACHMENT NO, �_ (3536d) FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO 92-17 : 1 . Since the subject property can be fully developed within regular established setbacks , such a conditional exception for an additional driveway along Pacific Coast Highway for the existin office building and with no on-site internal circulation is not r : necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial 1:= property rights . The renovation of the existing commercial building, approved under Use Permit No.. 90-18 and Conditional Exception No . 90-19 , complied with the parking requirements based on the code at that time. The additional driveway, has the potential to create additional vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian conflicts along Pacific Coast Highway. The additional parking space does not warrant the conflicts between vehicles entering and exiting the site, and reduction in landscaping. 2 . Granting of Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-17 for an additional driveway along Pacific Coast Highway for the existing office building and with no on-site, internal circulation between the two parking areas would constitute a special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon properties in the vicinity. Other parcels along Pacific Coast Highway in the vicinity have only one point. of ingress and egress (driveway) . 3 . Exceptional circumstances do not apply that deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the same zone classifications . 4 . Although the property is irregular in configuration, the proposed driveway access on the southerly property line will create a hazardous situation with vehicular ingress and egress and northbound traffic on Pacific Coast Highway. v. THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 2 :45 PM BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR TO THE NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 3 , 1992, AT 1 : 30 PM. Scott Hess Zoning Administrator : Jr �►00 ZA Minutes - 5/27/92 -8- (3536d) ATTACHMENT NO. 5 ALTERNATIVE FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 92-17 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 92-17: 1. There are exceptional or• extraordinaiy circumstances or conditions applicable to the land, buildings or premises involved that do not apply generally to other property or uses in the district. The property is irregular in sirapethe building was -constructed at the rear of the property and internal circulation between .the driveways is not possible. 2. The granting of a conditional exception for a second driveway with no internal circulation is necessary in order to preserve the enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights. 3 . The granting of Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-17 for a second driveway with no internal circulation will not be materially detrimental to the public health, -safety and welfare, or injurious to the conforming land, property, or improvements in the neighborhood. 4 . The conditional exception (variance) for a second driveway with no internal circulation is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City' s General Plan and Land Use Map designation of Visitor Serving Commercial. 5. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the proposed second driveway with no internal circulation will not _be detrimental to the general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; and property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. 6. The granting of the conditional exception (variance) for a second driveway with no internal circulation will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 7. The applicant is willing and able to carry out the purposes for which the conditional exception (variance) is sought and he will Vroceed to do so without unnecessary delay. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO 92-17: 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated November 23, 1992 shall be the conceptually approved layout. 2 . All outstanding conditions of approval of Use Permit No. 90-18 and Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 90-19, including street improvements and landscape installation, shall be completed within 120 days of final project approval. The following conditions of approval shall be deleted and revised as listed below: l.b. . The trash enclosure may be located at the rear of the site, adjacent to the easterly driveway. 4 . a. The northwesterly driveway approach shall be a minimum of twenty-seven (27) feet in width and the southeasterly driveway approach shall be- a -minimum of eighteen (18) feet in width. Both driveway approaches shall be of radius-type construction. 3 . The applicant shall install a mechanized security gate across the southeasterly driveway. The gate shall be subject to approval of the Public Works Department and Community Development Department. 4 . The entire site shall be reasphalted, repaved, and relandscaped in accordance with the plans dated November 23, 1992. 5. This Conditional Exception shall become null and void if the eighteen foot driveway approach is not approved by Caltrans. .(5397d-8, 9) y. �O --------------------- 930-90-018 9 930-90-020_ Ashley J Smith Vincent Kenny 15982 Mariner Dr 159-874 ner A�3 "�3 i 15986 Mariner Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Hu -a7,j -9-2-" Huntington Beach CA 92649 ✓ So/ 930-90-021 v930-90-022�S T� � '— �930-91-001 �� -vobbi Ba or - Michael M Evasovic Helena L Herning 15992 riner Dr 15994 Mariner Dr 15996 Mariner Dr 1 Hunti gton Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 9 -91- 0 2 V'K La Q _ -- �1 00 3 ,t,t / 1-00 4 Kenn P & Emilene King Verlan T iddy l0 3 a: Sf" U Wendell D Brown 15 8 riner Dr 16004 riner Dr 16006 Mariner Dr ntington Beach CA 92649 Hu7,6ton Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 V930-91-005 / 930-91-00 ✓ q3 93k - '�930-91-007 Hyams Thomas E &Thomas E Tr Pearson orothea J Tr Strong Marguerite 0 Tr 16008 Mariner Dr 16010 riner Dr 16016 Mariner Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Hunt gton Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 _•....---__ _... 930-91-008 �930-91-009 -- 930-9,1-010 Petersen Dorothy Tr Nicolson Garth F Tr Michael J Kondas 16018 Mariner Dr 16020 Mariner Dr 16022 Mariner Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 930-91-011 930-91-012 930-91-0 Edward F & Merilyn Simonin Bauler Arthur Tr in & Arlene Snyder 16028 Mariner Dr 16030 Mariner Dr ,+ 116 riner Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 unt`ingto Beach CA 92649 ��� CA q y. 930-91-014 �930-91-015 93�016 Dale F Dowis John H Runkel Marion L Tunks 16034 Mariner Dr 16040 Mariner Dr 16042 Mariner Dr I Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 i` 930-91-017 1/930-91-018 *9 91— 1 CV1 a4 Robert B & Carolyn Wells Pittman Carl D Tr i; Richa Hargaret He Guire 16044 Mariner Dr 16046 Mariner Dr 160 ner Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 i H tingt n Beach CA 92649 930-91-020 930-91-0 3 "Gl3 �` ✓930-91-022 Richard K Davis Geo e -H� stop " C' � i ou W,��pXANe► Steve & Victoria Rinek 16054 Mariner Dr 16056 ariner Dr yt(pW�e.Y2c� {�avlf 16058 Hariner Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Hun ngt n Beach CA q 175:7-1 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 930-91-023 / 930-91-024 ank L & Sandra ✓ Kert Jordan 1 ner Dr �,�. BMX L7-4 16066 Mariner Dr Hu n Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 CA *** 92 Printed ✓930-90-001 2 txi Steven A & Nancy Peterman Dh perties Ltd 15932 Mariner Dr 15 ariner Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 nti non Beach CA 926, ✓ 930-90-003 930-90-004 �� �� " �1� �930-90-005 Bruce C & Janice Kavin Da�tin"gton id ustafson Virginia M Romero 15936 Mariner Dr 15riner Dr 15944 Mariner Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 H Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 9264 ✓930-90-006 -90-007 �'� � } _- 0 -- - V Robert W Miller Jose ben Tr P� � � 9 90 08 Er & Eric Bakker 15946 Mariner Dr 159 er Dr 15 Mariner Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 ntingto Beach CA 92649 ntin on Beach CA 9264 930-90-009 '✓,93 0-01 (M �avt �� ' �930-90-011 Spencer R Alter Mark Louise Jasper Benton Whitehead 15956 Mariner Dr 159 ner Dr 15960 Mariner Dr Huntington, Beach CA 92649 ntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 9264 ✓930-90-012 930-90-013 ✓ L�d 30-90-014 John H Doran Ann R n °��S`�`� 5 �OU-u✓u-���'f Dale E Anderson 15962 Mariner Dr 19�8—Mariz ?t)u1► q 15970 Mariner Dr . Huntington Beach CA 92649 Hun-t�en � CAw 9.2t6-4'9 ! Huntington Beach CA 9264 930-90-015 ✓ 9 90-0 930-90-017 Grosh ack Tr L� �� 5V-V �/aALt4- Ern Siracusa i Edna B Kogan =/ng �bnea L CA 159 iner Dr � !; 15980 Mariner Dr CA 92649 tingto Beach CA 92649 �. 'j Huntington Beach CA 9264 178-481-01 %1178-481-02 William C Bruton Randall L & Brenda Turnbow 16184 Surfside Ave 16186 Surfside Ave Seal Beach CA 92663 Seal, Beach CA 92663 178-481-03 178-481-04 178-481-05 Schlange Alfred H Tr Margarite V Atukovich Robert E- & Mary Bacon 16188 Surfside Ave 16190 Surfside Ave 16192 Surfside Ave Seal Beach CA 92663 Seal Beach CA 92663 Seal, Beach CA 92663 �178-481-0� ✓,�u „. Vtc�l�eT�• �178-481-08 �178-481-09 Magno u h Tr 6-��, t�[)x Z03 Moe Bruce V Tr Pamela A Mac Donald 56 Surf Ave 5,,�,►� i��< cA `107� 1 16200 Surfside Ave 16202 Surfside Ave Newport B ach CA 92663 Seal Beach CA 9266.3 Seal. Beach CA 92663 �178-481-10 f 481- �� i ✓178-481-12 Jon H Regnier Milla aurice Tr Wi111am H & Victoria Sac�telle 16204 Surfside Ave 162 Sur a Ave 16208 Surfside Ave Seal Beach CA 92663 Se 1 Beach CA 92663 Seal. Beach CA 92663 -481-13 �' Pc�' 178-481-14 78-481-15 Mike ne Klistoff U Michael J & Mary Farrell A ur o Gallucci 1621 u e Ave 16212 Surfside Ave B-47 46 fic :Ave S Beach CA 92663 Seal Beach CA 92663 al Beac CA 92718 ;1718�17` 1 �178-471-1oan_W rame �. ycg-75- g-73 Virgini C Boggy 7 =S u .s i-d-e Ave 5�, �,�� c Z2—S,u r s i-d a Amore ;�.( ; % y N e w-p r-t—Beach—C-A Z 43 9-263 B ea c --GAS t IILQX�}-2 6 6-3 78-4 1- Qj-��� .0. Qj��c 35� �178-471-21 178-471-22 , ck & athryn Agosta Su►��c �/� Sam R & G eta Kennedy E 1 71 Sur s e Ave 107t3 �r7—Surf-- Ave .o, �c39¢ N e w p o t B e c h CA 92663 N�e-w B-e-a-c h CA czQ c 42 6 6 3 �A WtiCAjj,� 9ZG-6-3- G� 74 3 cr 4P5 178-41�1-23 178-471-2 ! 8-<Beact Bradr HiIdreth ldrtk-1i 5r&J �k Anna M tuko i Joovich fl� ,,��tt'' 65 Sur de Ct B — urfsJ.-dv--Aire 3-0' a��`�a� 16 de Ave Newpo Bach CA �`�r � �9 63D7 3 Sea- -a-cb—CA 5►� 7 A 9,26A3_ 11 a1A 92663 78-481- 1� 178 81-3 - ' ' ✓178-481-34 ose h pia - - .. et Rullo Mich & Ramona Mattingley Alex Meruelo 1623� Szrrfsfde -A e 'Ayd 49 S -s a Ave 16207 Surfside Ave S•e e-a-c-h--CA S5UA?)&a_d n 9.2-6-63-• New r t Be CA 92663, , Seal Beach CA 9 0 7 4 178-481-35 f178-481-36 `�178-481-37 Donald M row Donald G Anderson �610-5-St� -€sae-Ave �'�' 16203 Surfside Ave t� 16201c Surfside n F eAve S�aLB. r�h—CA 5'� Seal Beach CA AUeW Seal Beach CA 9074- �V VX1S VVI ,� �� . 178-481-39 \ G� 178-481 0 Est Of The a L Gray ; Gusta s C Bir 1ide Ave �.5-_Surf e—Ave �,SCA 92663 N e w.p-o-r ea-c-h--C-A —4� ' �N �A �7^5_ 7, 178- 81-41�_ ✓178-481-42 i � �178-481-44 Eugene G alegui Murrey & Sue Seidner Youngsma Peter 0 Tr 5-7--S-u - s de A?" - 5-7 16191 Surfside Ave 16187 Surfside Ave N-e-wpo-r-t -Be'ach-C-A 9-26-63 Seal Beach CA 92663 Seal Beach CA 92663 CA- �Ro•he,r--t yH,erron l y`' r & -'Jo a Kuppingee / (, Ro ert Jy& Rebecca KPndris� 6 t •S-u�r_ s-i d e--A a 2 � 6 7--5 trrf s i �Ov • N e w.go B eraetih A gfl Ar63- N e wp ort� €ah_C AAA46(9�16 6 3 A 9 26 178-47 -20 178-472-2 ` 178-472-22 Will S DorothyDavil nn J n P Tr T,fl. (�jV.23 W111ia P Uni �.o• �c z�t f par —Bea s` 663 Nevp� t--B-ea-c t ,- 92663 f 472-3 Rohe _6�M a r i l yn 0 _ iA e to,5 New eac -- �046 ft{�yA. 92663 �178-581-01 Point Mariner' s i . 15922 Coast Hwy Huntington Beach CA 92651 178-581-12 �178-581-15 178-581-16 Babubhai G Patel Vallabhbhai K Patel Fred Hadjian 16220 Coast Hwy 16196 Coast Hwy 16182 Coast Hwy Huntington, Beach CA 92651 Huntington Beach CA 92651 Huntington Beach CA 9265 V 178-581-18.819 Odis Bozarth - 16214 Coast Hwy Huntington Beach CA 92651 P PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST MAILING LABELS (5480d) 1/4/93 President William D. Holman 930-90-07 H.B. Chamber of Commerce Pacific Coast Homes Joseph, Rueben TR 2213 Main St. #32 2124 Main St. 10207 Babbitt Ave.. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Hunt. Bch., CA 92648-2499 Northridge, CA 91325 Board President Pres., H.B. Hist. Society 930-900-10 H.B./F.V. Board of Realtors C/O Newland House Museum ' Jasper, Mark F. 8101 Slater Ave. 19820 Beach Blvd. 1711 Camino Primavera Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 : Bakersfield, CA 93306 f I 930-900-08 Chairperson 1 930-900-02 Eric A. Baker TR Historical Resources Bd. ! DHT Properties, LTD. 16441 S. Pacific Ave. Comm. Services Dept. C/O California Federal Bank Sunset Beach, CA 90742 2000 Main St. P. 0. Box 60093 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 City of Industry, CA 91899 _. 930-900-16 930-910-02 930-910-19 Ernest V. Siracusa, Jr. King, Kenneth P.. McGuire, Richard P. 0. Box 17267 19396 Woodlands Lane P. 0. Box 131 Irvine, CA 92713 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Sunset Beach, CA 90742 Edna Littlebury 178-481-11 178-481-13 Golden St. Mob. Hm. Owners Leag. Millard, Maurice, TR Mike Klistoff 11021 Magnolia Blvd. 4312 Beeman Ave. 10243 Les.terford Ave. Garden Grove, CA 92642 Studio City, CA 91604 Downey, CA 90241 178-481-38 178-481-33 178-481-43/178-471-25 V.L. Denny Michael B. Mattingley John M. Artukovich P. 0. Box 179 A-49 Surfside Ave. P. 0. Box 195 Surfside, CA 90743 Surfside, CA 90743 Surfside, CA 90743 Joan "JP" Peoples 178-481-15 16184 Mariner Drive Arthur & Jo Galucci Huntington Beach, CA 92649 B-46 Surfsido, CA 90743 CALIFORNIA FEDERAL BANK A Fk"Savings Bards January 29, 1993 rn L n T' Connie Brockway, City Clerk o ;YrT ;m City of Huntington Beach a Office of the City Clerk c P.O. Box 190 w Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 Re: Notice of Public Hearing Gentlemen: We are returning the enclosed correspondence which we received. We are unable to identify and route unless we have a valid California Federal loan number. If you have any questions, you may contact me at ' ( 213 ) 267-6036. Sincerely, Kim Guevara Loan Service Supervisor Loan Service Division O� � 3 \X it California Federal Bank, FSB �\ Post Office Box 60093, City of Industry, California 91899-7093 h NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION' S DENIAL OF CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 92-17 (Second driveway to a commercial site . ) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Tuesday, February 16, 1993 , 7 : 00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 92-17 APPLICANT/ APPELLANT: Fred Hadjian LOCATION: 16182 Pacific ,Coast Highway ZONE: Visitor Serving Commercial - Coastal Zone REOUEST: This is an appeal of the Planning Commission' s denial of Conditional Exception (Variance) No . 92-17 which is a request to add a second driveway access with no internal circulation from Pacific Coast Highway to an existing commercial site. The request includes providing an additional parking space and relocation of the existing trash enclosure. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15305, Class 5 of the California Environmental Quality Act . COASTAL STATUS : This project is located in the Coastal Zone but may be categorically excluded from coastal development permits pursuant to Section 989 . 5 . 3 . 13 (g) , which exempts minor variances that do not pertain to height and that do not negatively impact coastal access or view corridors , from coastal development permits . ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department , 2000 Main Street , Huntington Beach, California 92648 , for inspection by the public . A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library (7111 Talbert Avenue) after February 12 , 1993 . NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING (Continued) ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence in writing to the City Clerk for or against the application as outlined above or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing . If there are any further questions please call Jane Madera, Assistant Planner at 536-5271. Connie Brockway, City Clerk Huntington Beach City Council 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714) 536-5227 (5469d) PLEASE GIVE FORM FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS/PUBLIC HEARINGS TO THE SERGEANT-AT-AR_h{S WHO IS LOCATED NEAR THE SPEAKER'S PODIUM{ Welcome to a Meeting of the HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY The public may address the CounciVAgency on any item on the agenda or items of interest during the section of the meeting devoted to Public Comments. There is a time limit of three minutes per speaker. A speaker may not use the time of any other person. The public is invited to address the City CounciURedevelopment Agency on Public Hearing agenda items when those items are called before the CounciUAgency. DATE: 02- I - g 3 /�/LESlD ENT /Llil/A /� 4Ssd p YOUR NAME �� 1 U Telephone 3 S �c2 r6 Please Print ADDRESS l l a /I.fNE 2 hz, r 7 Street City Zip Code ,, PLEASE � `"JJ PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM b - 1�,2o' 7 CHECK t Z P G1 ONE BOX ; 1 PUBLIC CO,-,&ffENTS Fill in Agenda Item if speaking on specific item. The City Council/Redevelopment Agency is interested in your comments. However, policy does not permit taking immediate action on most items brought to the CounciUAgency through Public Comments. Give this form to the Sergeant-at-Arms who is located near the speaker's podium. The City Clerk will call all speakers for both Public Comments and Public Hearings. All proceedings are recorded. WELCOME The. Huntington Beach City Council/Redevelopment Agency welcomes you to this meeting. The Council/Agency meet regularly at 7 p.m. the first and third Mondays of each month. Study sessions and special sessions may be called for other times irf the month. All sessions of the Council/Agency, except Closed Sessions which deal with such matters as personnel.or pending litigation, are open to the public, and the public is encouraged to attend. Agendas are available to the public-at the Office of the City Clerk, Huntington Beach Central Library and the Library annexes the week prior to regular meetings. Please recognize that members of the City Council/Redevelopment Agency receive-their agendas complete with supporting information several days before the meetings, thus . giving them an opportunity to study the information and to ask questions of the professional staff before the meeting. It may appear that some items before the Council/Agency are handled in a routine manner, but the members traditionally study all items carefully before meetings. Thank you for your interest in city government. Mayor and Councilmembers (City Council) Chairman and Members (Redevelopment Agency) (0599K) l)/qt He!'- City of Huntington Beach P.O.BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 9279 From the desk of. CONNIE BROCKWAY CITY CLERK GUPc� .. ... y7 w 74 CERTIFIED BARRY A. ROSS ATTORNEY AT LAW JAN-T93 2. 9 a MAILw o (ae f a ONE NEWPORT G NEWPO PE aWTFA PLACE, 7' REACH,CALIFORNIA a 5037$J3 TS.4�OS�'A�(;, a PLACE, a SUITE 900 92660 1 I I Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 i 1111111111111111111MIA, 11 14.1114 1 COVER SHEET FOR CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARINGS V N/A YES NO -T () W� Did Wang type ou City Council or Planning Commission public hearing n ce? If appeal, a appellant and applicant shown on legal notice? ( ) ( ) hou in is involved, is "legal challenge paragraph" nclud If Coastal Development Permit, are the RESIDENT labels attached and is the Coastal Commission Office on the labels. ( ) ( ( ) Were latest Assessor's Parcel Rolls used? ( ) (yam ( ) Is the appellant's name and address part of the labels? (� s day of public hearing correct — Monday/Tuesday? / () Has the City Administrator's Office authorized the public hearing to be set? (vf Is PC Matrix mailing list required? For Public Hearings at the City Council level please revise the last paragraph of the public hearing notice as follows: ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing .and express opinions or submit to the City Clerk, written evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If there are any further questions please call (insert name of Planner) at 536-5227. CONNIE BROCKWAY,CITY CLERK CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 (714) 536-5227 The paragraph which is currently on Coastal Commission public hearings should remain. 0019z STATE OF CAUFORNIA County of Orange I am a Citizen of the United States and a 3 resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the below entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the HUNTiNGTON BEACH PUBLIC NOTIPE E N of R O Nte go M E N T A L� STATES: Carically ex- INDEPENDENT, a newspaper of general NOTICE OF PUBLIC empt pursuant to Section, HEARING APPEAL OF 15305,;Class 5 of the Cali-, circulation, printed and published in the City of PLANNING forma Environmental 4ual- COMMISSION'S. %oAd. Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of DENIAL OF ASTAL STATUS: This project is located :in the CONDITIONAL . Coastal Zone but may be Cafifomia, and that attached Notice is a true and EXCEPTION catey6rically excluded from complete copy as was printed and published in (VARIANCE) cots Pr scant to variances per- �NO,9r2-17 mils pursuant to variances the Huntington Beach and Fountain Valle (Second commercial that do not pertain to Y to a t:ommercial height and that do not neg- issues of said newspaper to wit the issue(s) of: site.) cess it vie coastal rs, NOTICE IS HEREBY from or view corridors, GIVEN that the Huntington per Coastal development Beach City Council will permits. hold a public hearing to the ON FJLE: A copy of the Council Chamber at the Proposod request,is on file Huntington Beach Civic m the Community Develop- Center, 2000 Main Street, ment Department, 2000 Ma Street, Huntington January 21, 1993 Huntington Beach„Califor• Bean)►, California 9�648, nia, on the date and at the for inspection by the pub- time indicated below tore. lic .A copy of the staff re- ceive and consider the port wip be available to in- statements of all persons terested arties at City Hall who wish to be heard rela- or the Main City Library tive to the application de. (71II Tat bert Avenue)after scribed below. January 28,1993. DATEITIME:Mondayy,Feb-. ALL INTERESTED PER- ruary 1.1993,7:00 PM SONS are invited to attend APPLICATION, NUMBER: saidhear and express Conditional Exception opinions or submit evi- (Variance)No.92-17 dence in writing to the City APPLICANT/APPELLANT: Clerk for or against the ap- Fred Had'ian pliCation as outlined above LOCATtM. 16182 Pacific or In written c o r- Coast Highway respondence delivered to ZONE: Visitor Serving the City Clerk A or prior Commercial-Coastal Zone to, the public hearing:.If REQUEST: This is an ap there are any further qua peat of the Planning Cor - tlo»s please call Jane Mad- mission's denial of Condi- tional Exception (Variance) era, No. 92-17 'which is a re- 1 1 declare, under penalty of perjury, that the quest to add a second Connie Brockway, driveway access with no in- City Clerk foregoing is true and correct. temal circulation from Pa- Huntington. Beach City clfic Coast Highway to any Cquncll,-2000 Main Street, existing commercial site. Huntington Beach, CA The request includes 'pro- 92"8(714)536-5227. Executed on January 21 199 3 viding an additional park-I Published Huntington ing space and relocation of Beach-Fountain Veiny I n,, the existing trash enclo- at Costa MLsa, arifomia. sure. dependent -January 21, ZI I 013841 Signat e PROOF OF PUBLICATION