Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
FINAL TRACT MAP NO 15071 - Subdivision Agreement - Broadmoor
City of Huntin ton Belch • P O BOX 711 CALIFORNIA 92648 _ « TELEPHONE 714 536.5200 FAx 714 374.1603 SHARI L.FREIDENRICH CITY TREASURER September 16, 1999 CERTIFIED MAIL National American Insurance company 1008 Manvel Avenue Chandler, OK 74834 To Whom It May Concern: This is to inform you the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, on June 18, 1999, approved the release of the following bonds: yi40•(00 Tract# 15071 Faithful Performance and Labor&Material Bond No. CBB1456 Monument Bond No. CBB1457 We are releasing the bonds and have enclosed them for your file. Also enclosed, is a copy of the City Council Action approving the release of the above-referenced bonds. If you have any questions regarding this matter,please contact me at(714) 536-5200. Sincerely, l— Shari L. Freidenrich, CPA, CCMT City Treasurer Enclosures: cc: Broadmoor Beach, L.L.C. 5405 Oberlin Drive San Diego, CA 92121 Bob Beardsley, Director of Public Works (no attachments) Connie Brockway, City Clerk (no attachments) G:%Den inc`.shari`•Lctters'•.BondW4 o leoo roo GOLSA MOOsrr,,. � IaNORR \ HIM \ WARNIR WARNER �\ IATIR WHET IIIK � s OARtTIIG I k SITE ? VORRTOWN i / ADAMS /' �.ININANA►OlK Y /ATMNTA u /NAM4TON Ir ■■ J � « � 7 J •MTV� rA . � M C rwRo ur w Tentative Tract #15 07 1/Conditional Use Permit #95-72Nariance #95-16 = HUNTINGTON SUCH PLANNING DIVISION ATTACHMENT 2 I have received Maintenance Bond No. CBB11880— National American Insurance Company, for Broadmoor Beach LLC. Re: Tract No. 15071, Broadmoor Beach LLC—w/Edwards/n/Slater. Dated: By: NATIONAL AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY MAINTENANCE BOND 1008 Manvel Avenue Chandler, OK 74834 (800) 822-7802 Bond No. CBB11880 Premium: $656.00 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That. Broadmoor Beach LLC, a California Limited Liability Company as Principal, National American Insurance Company and P y ,a corporation organized under the laws of the Slate ol_ Nebraska and authorized to do a surely business in the Slate of California as Surely, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Huntington Beach in the sum of Twenty Six Thousand Two Hundred Fifty and N01100 Dollars (S 26,250.00 ), lawful money of the United Slates of America, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents: SEALED with our seals and dated this September 1, 1998 _ WHEREAS, on the the said Broadmoor Beach LLC as contractor, entered Into a contract for Subdivision Improvements, Tract 15071 for the sum of—Two Hundred Sixty Two Thousand Five Hundred and NO/100 Dollars t3 262,500.00 ); and, WHEREAS, under the terms of the specifications for said work, the said Broadmoor Beach:LLC to required to give a bond for Twenty Thousand Two Hundred Fifty and NO/100 Dollars ($ 25,250.00 ), to protect the Catty of Huntington Beach againet the result of laulty materials or workmanship fora period of one year'from and after the dale of the completion and acceptance of name, namely, until—September 2. 1998 NOW, THEREFORE, if the Bald Broadmoor Beach LLC ■hall for a period of one year from and after the dale of the completion and acceptance of some by sold City of Huntington Beach replace any and all defects arising In said work whether resulting from defective materials or defective workmanship, then the above obligation to be void; otherwise to remain In full force and effect. Broadmoor Beach, LLC, a California limited liability company By: Broadmoor Homes Southwest Inc. a California orpo t Mnager .irriiUVED AS TO FORMII By: C r0 GAIL HUT'TON CITY ATTORNEY B : NATIO L AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY By Jerome L. Hren, Attorney—in—Fact State of l RIGHT THUMBPRINT(Optional) County of r1 uM /ff , On before me, Ulu G�� . �S10 (DATE) (NAMEITI LE 00 OFFICER-i.e.'JANEE DOE NOTARY PUBLIC") c personally appeared A AVI y V , 41 I ✓`dlNy (NAME'S)OF SIGNER(Sll CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER(S) ❑INDIVIDUAL(S) ❑CORPORATE personally known to me -OR- ❑ pproved to me on the OFFICER(S) (TITLES) basis of satisfactory OPARTNER(S) ❑LIMITED evidence to be the ❑GENERAL person(s) whose name(s) ❑ATTORNEY IN FACT is/are subscribed to the ❑TRUSTEE(S) within instrument and ❑GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR acknowledged to me that ❑OTHER: he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: and that by his/her/their (Name of Person(s)or Entity(ies) signature(s) on the - instrumentthe person(s), D. W. J NSEN � li or the entity upon behalf coy:):!. r10'19639 In of which the person(s) v 0" NS7ARi FLF.L'.C-CALIFORNIA n `y.. -' 63 C i - OUNTY acted, executed the c r � ! RIGHT THUMBPRINT(Optional) instrument. My Ccrnn.ExJiTc9 JAN.16,1999 Witness my han and official seal. W X a (SEAL) o J(!MGNAVURE OF NOTARY) CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER(S) ❑INDIVIDUALIS) ❑CORPORATE ATTENTION NOTARY OFFICER(S) The information requested below and in the column to the right is OPTIONAL. (TITLES) Recording of this document is not required by law and is also optional. It could, however, prevent fraudulent attachment of this certificate to any ❑PARTNER(S) ❑LIMITED unauthorized document. ❑GENERAL ❑ATTORNEY IN FACT THIS CERTIFICATE Title or Type of Document ❑TRUSTEE(S) MUST BE ATTACHED ❑GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR TO THE DOCUMENT Number of Pages Date of Document ❑OTHER: DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Signer(s)Other Than Named Above SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: (Name of Person(s)or Entitylies) WOLCOTTS FORM 63240 Rev.3.94(price class B-2A) 0,994 WOLCOTTS FORMS,INC. ALL PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT WITH SIGNER CAPACITYIREPRESENTATION/TWO FINGERPRINTS (III II I III(III IIIIII �� 7 67775 63240 8 KIATIONAL AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY Bond OMAHA, NEBRASKA Number CBB 118 g 011- PRINCIPAL: NAME,ADDRESS POWER OF ATTORNEY CITY,STATE,ZIP ORIGINALS OF THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY ARE PRINTED ON BLUE Broadmoor Beach LLC,a California Limited Liability SAFETY PAPER. DUPLICATES SHALL HAVE THE SAME FORCE AND Company EFFECTAS AN ORIGINAL ONLY WHEN ISSUED IN CONJUNCTION WITH 312 S. Cedros Avenue#340,Solana Beach,CA 92075 THE ORIGINAL. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:That the National American Insurance Company,a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Nebraska.hawing its principal office in the city of Chandler.Oklahoma.pursuant to the following resolution.adopted EFFECTIVE DATE by the Board of Directors of the said Company on the 8th day of July,1987.to'A it: "Resolved,that any officer of the Company shall have authority to make.execute and 09/01/98 deliver a Power of Attorney constituting as Attorney-in-fact, such persons, firms, or I i corporations as may be selected from time to time. CONTRACT AMOUNT Resolved that nothing in this Power of Attorney shall be construed as a grant of authority to the attorneys)-in-fact to sign,execute.acknowledge,deliver or otherwise issue a policy or $ �26,2]50.00 policies of insurance on behalf of National American Insurance Company. Be It Further Resoled.that the signature of any officer and the Seal of the Company BOND AMOUNT may be affixed to any such Power of Attorney or any certificate relating thereto by facsimile, 26,250.00 and any such Power of Attorney or certificate bearing such facsimile signature or facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company and any such powers so executed and certified by facsimile signature and facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company in the future with respect to any bond and documents relating to such bonds to which it is attached."National American Insurance Company does hereby make,constitute and appoint Jerome L. Hren its true and lawful attorney(s)-in-fact.with full power and authority hereby conferred in its name,places and stead,to sign,execute,acknowledge and deliver in its behalf,and its act and deed-as follows: The obligation of the Company shall not exceed one million(S 1,000.000.00)dollars. And to bind National American Insurance Company thereby as fully and to the same extent as if such bonds and documents relating to such bonds were,signed by the duly authorized office: of the National American Insurance Company.and all the acts of said Attorney(s)pursuant to the authority herein given,are hereby ratified and confirmed. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the National American Insurance Company has caused these presents to be signed by any officer of the Company and its Corporate Seal to be hereto affixed. Gp,N INStlH Pf°n f+y NATIONALAMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY o �. p _ W SEAL 7 ~A. + W.Brent LaGere,Chairman&Chief Executive Officer OHaM� Nfl�aSR' STATE OF OKLAHONIA ) COUNTY OF LINCOLN 1 SS: On this 8th day of July,A.D.1987,before me personally came W.Brent LaGere,to me known,who being by me duly sworn,did depose and say;that he resides in the County o Lincoln,State of Oklahoma;that he is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the National American Insurance Company,the corporation described in and which executed th, above instrument;that he knows the seal of said corporation:that the seal affixed to the said instrument is such corporate seal:that it was so affixed by order of the Board of Director of said corporation and that he signed his name,thereto by like order. �NcA 4# e`�p i A PUBLIC 010. fTarl or t k A44, 4QOL"cpd� Notary Public STATE OF OKLAHONIA ) My Commission Expires August 30,1999 COUNTY OF LINCOLN ) SS: I,the undersigned,Assistant Secretary of the National American Insurance Company,A Nebraska Corporation,DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing and attache POWER OF ATTORNEY remains in full force. t,N tN$t, 1st f.September 98 Signed and Sealed at the City of Chandler. pie N� Dated the day o 19 4 1ron4 1 SEAL 4. Winifred E.Mendenhall,Assistant Secretary OWA"N rf fgaS0, ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ATT............................................... A...-.. CHMEN.. T 4 -........-........-.......-.........-..... ................... ........................... ..... .................................... ............ .. ........... ...... ...... .. ..... ........... ....... ....... ............ ............... ............... . . ..... ................:,."1'.1""'R"i .. ... ........... . ... ...... ...... ............ .. ..... ..... ...... . . . .. . ............... ............ ................ ............................... ........ I I.............. ............................... .......... ............ .............................. ... ....... ............ .......... . .... 000011.0, ..... ........ ................... .................... ......................... ........... .............................. TO: Planning Commission FROM: Howard Zelefsky, Planning Director BY: Mary Beth Broeren, Assistant Plannjp� DATE: December 12, 1995. SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15071/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-72NARIANCE NO. 95-16/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 95-8 LOCATION- 17301 Edwards Street (600 feet north of Slater Avenue on the west side) -------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------ ----------------------- STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Tentative.Tract Map No. 15071 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-72, represent a. request by Broadmoor Homes Southwest, Inc. to subdivide a former nursery site into 17 lots for the construction of 17 detached single family units. The proposed tract will gain access from the extension of Madera Lane. The request includes an approximately 10 foot high block wall, up to four feet of which is retaining wall, along Edwards Street. A variance is requested to provide vine treatment-along the wall on Edwards Street in lieu of a five foot wide landscape area required by code. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the single family development that surrounds the project site. The density for the project is 4.6 units/gross acre. In accordance with the City's residential infill ordinance, the applicant is proposing architectural features to reduce bulk and massing and minimal grade differences between proposed and existing lots. Staff supports the ten foot high block wall along Edwards Street because the proposed wall is compatible with existing wall segments on either side of Edwards Street. 'Staff recommends denial of the variance because the project could be developed at the same density without the variance and meet all code provisions. Staff recommends that the applicant provide a three foot wide easement along Edwards Street which will be combined with two feet from the public right-of- way. This design leaves a six foot wide sidewalk and 17.5 foot wide rear yards along Edwards Street. An alternative circulation plan has been prepared in response to concerns raised by neighbors and is incorporated as an alternative action. The Departments of Public works and Fire feet it is a less desirable layout due to limited access points that reduce emergency vehicle response times. Staff recommends.approval of the tentative tract map and conditional use permit for the project for the following reasons: • The project is consistent with the objectives of the Low Density Residential provisions of the code in achieving a development that has an integrated design with the existing surrounding neighborhood. Public street sections, comparable lot sizes, a mix of one and two-story units, and reducing impacts caused by grade differentials between properties are methods used to provide a compatible project. soma s I o "COST 5r � � EDINGER I NFII WARNER - WARNER \ SCAIER 'AltEtT - t � GAtEIFID r - M SITE ? /►ORKiOwN 1 ADAMS I I I i'MMANAPMtS r \ Y • I �.AitANiA is � /�14MKiON N RCEuuu oa - W / ORRO Yi L, - A► Tentative Tract #1:5.071/Conditional R Use Permit #95-72Nariance #95-16 HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION i e The project's design, including the proposed grading, properly adapts to the surrounding terrain and land uses. The project complies with the Infill Lot development standards by requiring that grading occur only to the extent necessary to provide proper drainage. The proposed wall segment along Edwards Street will match existing. e The project will not be detrimental to the general health, welfare and safety, nor detrimental or injurious to the value of property and improvements of the neighborhood or of the City in general. The project is compatible with existing land uses and will be provided with the infrastructure necessary for the development. In addition, the proposed project will provide more than the minimum parking requirement on site. o The project will correct an existing deficiency related to fire safety for the southern segment of Madera Lane and a through-street ensures the fastest possible response time. • Better overall circulation is achieved for existing residents with the proposed through street design because it provides for two (2) access points in case of emergency (accident, flooding, etc.) e The potential environmental impacts have been identified and analyzed under Mitigated Negative Declaration No 95-8. The review indicates that with the implementation of the recommended mitigation measures and conditions of approval, the proposed project will not have an adverse impact on the environment. e The proposed project is consistent with the Low Density Residential Land Use designation and policies contained in the Housing Element and Land Use Element by providing a variety of housing-types. a The variance is not required because there are no special circumstances applicable to the property and it is not necessary to preserve property rights. The project could be developed at the same density without the variance and meet all code provisions. RECOMMENDATION: Motion to: 1. "Approve Negative Declaration No. 95-9 (Attachment No. 5)with findings and mitigation measures." 2. "Approve Tentative Tract Map No. 15071 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-72 with findings and conditions of approval (Attachment No. 1)." 3. "Deny Variance No. 95-16 with findings for denial (Attachment No. I GENERAL INFORMATION: APPLICANT: Broadmoor Homes Southwest, Inc., 5402 Oberlin Dr., Ste. 200, San Diego, CA 92121 PROPERTY OWNER: Mr. Hitoshi Mukai, 17292 Madera Lane, Huntington Beach, CA 92647 REQUEST: To permit the subdivision of approximately 3.7 acres into 17 lots for purposes of developing 17 one and two story detached single family residential units. The request includes an approximately 10 foot high block wall, up to four feet of which is retaining wall, along Edwards Street. A variance is requested to allow a wall on Edwards Street in lieu of a five foot wide landscape area required by code. DATE ACCEPTED: November. 15, 1995 Staff Report- 12/12/95 2 (pcsr171) ,• SUBJECT PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS: Subiect Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Residential Low Density ZONE: RL=FP2 (Low Density Residential -Floodplain) LAND USE: Vacant; former nursery North. West and South of Subiect Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Residential Low Density ZONE: RL-FP2 (Low Density Residential -Floodplain) LAND USE: Single Family Units East of Subiect Property (across Edwards Street): GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Residential Low Density ZONE: RL-FP2 (Low Density Residential - Floodplain) LAND USE: Single Family Units PROJECT PROPOSAL: There are three entitlements requested for the proposed project: 1. Tentative Tract Map No. 15071 is a request to subdivide a 3.7 acre former nursery site into a 17 lot subdivision consisting of 17 single family residential units pursuant to Section 251.02 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (HBZSO). The 17 lots average 7,174 square•feet in lot area, ranging from 6,3.00 square feet to 10,929 square feet in size. Eleven of the lots are between 6,000 and 6,820 square feet. Three lots range in size from 7,000 to 7,750 square feet. The remaining three lots are approximately 8,190 square feet, 9,476 square feet and 10, 829 square feet. These three larger lots are located on the perimeter of the proposed tract. The applicant proposes access from Madera Lane via connection of the two existing Madera Lane segments, to the north and south of the subject site. A new cul-de-sac, with access from Madera Lane, is also proposed. The infrastructure improvements include the installation of sidewalk, curb and gutter. On the east side of Madera Lane these improvements would match those on the existing Madera Lane segments (i.e., the parkway adjacent to the street). On the west side of Madera Lane the sidewalk and parkway locations would be reversed (i.e., sidewalk adjacent to street). Grade differences between the adjacent properties and the project site will not exceed two feet. Existing walls along the perimeter of the tract on the north, south and west property lines will be preserved where possible. In some instances, existing wall segments may need to be replaced. Wood fences will be installed between the individual lots within the proposed tract, though each lot will have a masonry wall return in the front of the lot. Staff Report- 12/12/95 3 (pcsrl7l) i • The City's affordable housing policy'requires that 10 percent of a project's units, or their equivalent if provided off-site, be available as affordable housing for a period of 30 years. The applicant proposes to. comply with the City's affordable housing policy by rehabilitating two units in an existing apartment project (see Attachment 7). These units would be affordable for a period of 30 years. 2. Conditional Use Permit No. 95-72 is a request to construct 17 detached single family units pursuant to Section 210.02 and Section 210.06 "RL;Property Development Standards" of the HBZSO. Nine units are one-story, and eight units are two-story. There are two house plans, each with a minor floor plan variation. Plan One is for a 3,100 square foot, single-story, four bedroom home with a three car side-entry garage. The variation to this plan has the same total square footage but has a front-entry garage. The maximum height of this product type is 24 feet. (Note that Plan One only requires a two car garage per the standards of the HBZSO,.) Plan Two consists of a 3,574 or 3,610 square foot five or six bedroom home, depending on the selected floor plan. Both are two-story products. Either of the plans has a three car front-entry garage with.three open spaces on the driveway. The maximum height of the two-story unit is 27.5 feet. The conditional use permit request includes an approximately 10 foot high block wall, three to four feet of which is retaining wall, along Edwards Street pursuant to Section 230.88 A.7.b "Site Standards" of the HBZSO in lieu of a maximum eight foot high wall (6 foot wall on 2 foot retaining wall). The HBZSO requires a conditional.use permit for a retaining wall on the property line of a rear yard abutting an arterial highway if it protects a fill greater than two feet. 3. Variance No. 95-16 is a request for relief from the requirement to provide a five foot wide landscape easement along arterials pursuant to Section 210.02 and Section 210.06 "RL Property Development Standards of the HBZSO. The applicant proposes to place the wall along the Edwards Street right- of-way property line. The proposal will include vine treatment along the wall to match existing planting on the wall at the south corner of Edwards Street and Athena Drive. The applicant requests the variance for three reasons. First, the applicant notes that the five foot wide landscape area is not provided anywhere else on Edwards Street in the project vicinity. The project site has 330 feet of frontage on Edwards Street, and the applicant does not believe that that small of a landscape area when compared with the existing expanses of wall would make a noticeable difference. Second, the incorporation of the landscape area would reduce the rear yards of the five lots on Edwards Street by five feet to 15.5 feet (see Attachment No. 4 for revised site plan and applicant's landscape alternative). The applicant believes that a wider rear yard area:is more advantageous to. property owners along Edwards Street, increasing the buffer between street noise and the residential units. Finally, the applicant thinks that vine treatment along the wall would provide adequate visual relief to motorists and pedestrians on Edwards Street. Staff Report- 12/12/95 4 (pcsrl7l) ----- ----- Zoning Compliance The following is a zoning conformance matrix which compares the proposed project with the development standards of Chapter 210 Residential District Standards and Chapter 231 Off-Street Parkins for single. family dwellings: .. . ........... ..... . .......... ........ ....... . . .... ............... ........ .. . .............. . .... . .... .. .. . ..... ..... . .. . . ...... ID I. .............. ........................... ....- ...... ..... ...... .... 210.06 - Bldg. Site Requirements: Min. Area 6,000 sq.ft. 6,300-10,829 sq.ft. (avg. 7,174 sq.ft.) Mn. Width 60 ft. 60-71 ft. 45 ft. for cul-de sac lots 46.5-76 ft. cul-de-sac Min. Setbacks: Front 15 ft. min. 20 ft. Side 10%, min. 3-ft, max. 5 ft. 5-ft. Street side 20%, min. 6 ft., max. 10 ft. 10 ft. Rear 10 ft. min. 11; ft. 15 ft. min. for through lots 20.5 ft. for through lots M Garage 20 ft. min. for front entry 20 ft-. for front entry 10 ft. min. for side entry 10 ft. for side entry Building Height 35 ft. max.; two-story max. 24 ft.; one story (9 units) 27.5 ft.; two story (8 units) Max. FAR N/A N/A Min. Lot Area/ 6,222 sq. ft. 9,480 sq. ft. Dwelling Unit (Density) (.Max. 7 units/gross ac.- 25 units) (4.6 units/gross ac.- 17 units) Lot Coverage 50% max. 48% (3,024 sq.ft.) .(M) Floor Area 'Mn. 1.000 sq. ft. Min. 2,485 sq.ft. (0) Open Space N/A N/A (R) Landscaping :5 ft. wide landscape area along No landscape area* arterial street/highway 231.04 Off-Street Parking 2 enclosed, 2 open . 3 enclosed, 2 open (0-4 Bedroom) (0-4 Bedroom) 3 enclosed, 3 open 3 enclosed, 3 open (5+Bedroom) (5+Bedroom) Variance request The subdivision has been reviewed under the City's residential infill lot development standards, pursuant to Section 230.22 of the HBZSO. As discussed in the"Analysis" section, the proposed tract has been designed to minimize impacts to existing adjacent residences by constructing homes which are compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Staff Report- 12/12/95 5 (pcsr171) ISSUES: General Plan Conformance: The proposed project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's General Plan and the Residential Low Density Land Use Element designation on-the subject property. Specifically, it achieves a Housing Element goal of"attainment of decent housing within a satisfying living environment for households of all socioeconomic, racial and ethnic groups in Huntington Beach. The project also encourages and maintains a"well balanced variety of residential densities and uncrowded living environments by encouraging rational use of land and other natural resources," a goal of the Land Use Element. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan Advisory Committee's recommendation.; as,part of the General Plan Update, to maintain the Residential Low Density land use designation on the subject property. Environmental Status: Staff has reviewed the environmental assessment and determined that no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed project that could not be mitigated to a level of insignificance with proper design, engineering and proactive measures. Subsequently, Negative Declaration No. 95-8 (Attachment No. 5) was prepared with mitigation measures pursuant to Section 240.04 of the HBtSO and the provisions of the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA). The Department of Community Development advertised draft Negative Declaration No. 95-8 for twenty (20) days commencing on November 2, 1995 and ending on November 21, 1995. Comments were received from Huntington Beach Union High School District concerning potential impacts to its facilities from students generated as a result of the project and a response has been included with the attached Negative Declaration. In addition, there is a discussion under the"Anaivsis" section of the report. .Prior to any action on Tentative Tract No. 15071, Conditional Use Permit No. 95-72 and Variance No. 95- 16, it is necessary for the Planning Commission to review and act on Negative Declaration No. 95-8. Staff, in its initial study of the project, is recommending that the negative declaration be approved with findings and mitigation measures. Coastal Status: Not applicable. Redevelopment Status: Not applicable. Design Review Board: Not applicable. Staff Report- 12/12/95 .6 (pcsrl7l) Subdivision Committee: On November 3, 1995, the Subdivision Committee reviewed Tentative Tract No 15071. After a staff presentation on the proposed project, and discussion.on the suggested conditions of approval, the Subdivision Committee recommended approval of the tract map with conditions. See Attachment No. 6 for minutes. Staff notified affected agencies and all property owners within 300 feet of the subject site and along key access points to the site, beyond the 300 feet, about the Subdivision Committee meeting. Staff received calls from six property owners and the Huntington Beach Union High School District. One of the property owners suggested an alternate street layout, discussed in the "Analysis" section below; the other property owners asked for clarification about the type of units, timing of the project, etc. and were not opposed to the project. The School District's comments are discussed in the"Analysis" section. Other Departments Concerns: The Departments of Public Works, Fire, and Police and the Building Division have reviewed the proposed subdivision and have recommended conditions which are incorporated into the conditions of approval. ANALYSIS: Land Use Compatibility: The proposed subdivision is compatible and consistent with the two existing single family residential tracts surrounding the project site. The proposed density for the project is 4.6 units/gross acre. This is comparable to the density of the existing surrounding RL development (4.6 to 4.7 units/gross ac.) and is below the maximum (7.0 units/gross ac.) allowed by code. On a net acreage basis, the proposed density is 6.0 units per net acre. Lot sizes for the surrounding area are also similar to those proposed for the project. As shown in the table below, the majority of the proposed and existing lots are between 6,000 and 7,999 square feet. LOT SIZE COMPARISON Proposed 17 Lots Existing 16 Lots (directly abutting project site) Lot Area (square feet) No. of Lots Percent No. of Lots Percent 6,000-6,999 11 65 4 25 7,000-7,999 3 18 7 44 8,000-8,999 1 6 2 13 9,000-9,999 1 6 0 0 10,000 + 1 6 3 19 Total 17 100 16 100 Staff Report- 12/12/95 7 (pcsr171) Two of the proposed cul-de-sac lots (lots 10 and 12) are considered flag lots. The applicant proposes decorative pavers in the driveways to minimize their elongated shape and to augment landscaping. To reduce light impacts from vehicles in these driveways on lots 9, 11 and 13, all adjacent to the flag lots, the applicant proposes two story homes, with all but one bedroom on the second floor. Staff supports the applicant's design and thinks it will be aesthetically appealing and not intrusive to adjacent property owners. The proposed units, ranging in size from 3,100 to 3,610 square feet, are larger than those in the surrounding area. The existing homes are approximately 2,600-2,800 square feet in size; however, almost all of these homes have two stories. The applicant is proposing a mix of one and two-story homes to minimize potential impacts resulting from the difference in square feet and to better integrate the project with existing development. More than half of the units (nine) will be single story. Of the eight units that are two story, five are located along Edwards Street where they will have minimal impact on existing units. Additionally, in many instances, the existing homes are separated from the proposed units by significant yard areas because of their large lots. Of the 17 proposed lots, 15 are on the perimeter and 12 of these perimeter lots are adjacent to an existing unit. Of these 12 proposed lots, nine are situated such that their rear yards are adjacent to existing rear yards or existing and proposed side yards are adjacent to one another. The minimum separation between units on these lots is 36 feet, the maximum separation is over 100 feet. Of the three lots which do not have adjacent like yards (e.g., a rear yard adjacent to a side yard) the minimum separation between the existing and proposed units is 24 feet. The applicant is also proposing architectural features including front entry ways and offsets to reduce bulk and massing. The second story deck element in Plan Two is oriented towards the street and is set back an additional three feet from the exterior walls. Thus,:the lot size, floor plans and orientation of units ensures privacy, minimization of bulk and open areas between units. In accordance with the City's residential infill ordinance, the applicant is proposing minimal grade differences between proposed and existing lots. There are 13 existing lots that would be most directly affected by the project. Compared.with the proposed lots, nine of these would have grade differences of less than one foot. Four of the lots would have grade differentials between one and two feet. Staff has received a letter from a property owner on the east side of Edwards Street expressing concern about noise generated from additional traffic from the proposed subdivision (Attachment No. 8). The letter notes that there has been a general increase in traffic on Edwards Street which has been and will continue to be exacerbated by the already approved homes south of the project site at Garfield Avenue and Edwards Street. The property owner is interested in having the wall that abuts the properties on the east side of Edwards Street better sound-proofed, possibly by adding two to three feet of block wall. (The current wall is eight feet high.) Staff has explained to the property owner that he, and his neighbors, could apply for a conditional use permit to the Zoning Administrator requesting a higher wall but that engineering and design considerations might.necessitate rebuilding the entire wall. The environmental analysis for this project also found that this segment of Edwards Street, a secondary arterial, is operating at. a Level of Service of A and is not located in a 60 or greater CNEL noise contour level. Staff Report- 12/12/95 8 (pcsr171) Infrastructure Improvements The proposed street sections on the east side of Madera Lane will mirror the existing street improvements with landscaped parkways adjacent to the street. The proposed lot configuration results in side yards along the west side of Madera Lane. Experience has shown that parkways adjacent to side yards are better maintained if directly adjacent to private property. Thus, on the west side of Madera Lane, the sidewalk and parkway locations will be reversed; this design will be continued in the proposed cul-de-sac. The sidewalk design is supported by the Public Works Department. The applicant also requests an approximately 10 foot high block wall, up to four feet of which is retaining wall, along Edwards Street. The code currently allows an eight foot high wall, two feet of which is retaining, without a conditional use permit. The proposed wall would be similar in total height to existing walls north and south of the subject site. There is also an existing wall segment of these dimensions at the northern end of the site which would be replaced. Staff supports the applicant's request because the proposed wall is compatible with existing wall segments on either side of Edwards Street. Implementation of the project and related improvements will also improve drainage flows in the area. Currently, run-off flows to the south to a catch basin at Morro Bay Lane and Slater Avenue. Construction of the project will result in half of the run-off flowing to the north to Athena and Edwards Street. Circulation Alternative Staff received a request to consider an alternate street layout from an existing resident of Madera Lane. (See letter as Attachment No. 9.) The request is to have access to the proposed tract only from the north, via Athena Drive, and to allow the southern segment of Madera Lane to remain as dead-end. Subsequently, staff received six additional letters from other residents of the southern segment of Madera Lane with the same request (see Attachment No. 10). Although not opposed to the project, the residents have expressed several concerns about the potential impact to their segment of Madera Lane. The table below lists their five primary concerns and provides a response from staff. Residents' Concerns Staff Response 1) Increased traffic The Department of Public Works has projected that the total number of trips on Madera Lane from all development (95 homes)will'be approximately 582 average daily trips which is considered very, very light traffic for a.residential street in Huntington Beach. 2) Increased vehicle speeds Vehicle speeds will be in the range of 20 to 35 mph. These are standard speeds throughout the city. 3)Drainage problems Increased runoff from the project would be about 0.5 to 1.0 cubic feet per second (CFS). Compared to the approximately 3,700 CFS of the adjacent channel along Slater Avenue, the potential impact from the project is minimal. Moreover, half of the runoff will be directed to the north. Staff Report- 12/12/95 9 (pcsr171) Residents' Concerns Stag'Response 4) Increased crime There is always the possibility of increased crime as the city develops. Because Madera Lane is not directly connected to an arterial, we would expect any increase to be minimal. 5) Change in flood exemption status Based on conversations with FEMA, staff does not believe that the flood exemption status will be changed. This is because the scope of the project is relatively small and the proposed elevation of the project is comparable to that of the surrounding area, all of which is exempt because of its overall elevation.' Staff has met with-one of the residents to discuss these concerns and potential circulation alternatives. Attachment No. I I provides a conceptual drawing of the most viable alternative. It maintains the dead-end for residents of the southern segment of Madera Lane and directs all traffic from the proposed development to the north. To address fire access concerns, it provides a 24 foot wide easement from the proposed development to the southern segment of Madera Lane. This area would have paver blocks and a locked gate for emergency personnel access only. The project would still consist of 17 units. Attachment No. 12 contains changes and additions to the recommended conditions of approval associated with this alternative for the Planning Commission's consideration. The Departments of Public Works and Fire have analyzed the residents' concerns and the alternative street configuration and find that it does not result in a better overall project design. The applicant's proposal to connect north and south Madera Lane is the best site layout for several reasons, summarized below. Fire Department: o Related to fire safety, the proposed project would correct an existing deficiency; whereas, the alternative suggested would allow this deficiency to continue and'would create another. Specifically, the Fire Department requires that no street segment from a through street to the end of-a dead-end street exceed 600 feet. This standard was established to avoid long roadways that could be blocked because of accidents, flooding, etc. Currently, the roadway from Morro Bay Lane to the end of the southern Madera Lane segment is 835 feet. If the alternate design were allowed,the dimension of the new cul de sac from Athena Drive would be 669 feet. By extending Madera Lane through, as the applicant proposes, these deficiencies would not exist. e The alternative with an easement to allow fire access will still result in delays to response time. • A through street ensures the fastest possible response time by emergency vehicles. Public Works: e Better circulation is achieved for residents and emergency vehicles by providing two access points, to the south and north, for the proposed tract. It also is better for existing residents because it allows for two (2) egress and ingress opportunities in the event of an emergency (accidents, flooding, etc.). e A through street'does not place the impact of all trips on residents to the north of the tract as the alternate plan would do. Staff Report- 12/12/95 10 (pcsr171) o The existing dead-end segments were not constructed as standard cul-de-sacs, indicating that it was. intended for them to ultimately be connected. In addition, the dead end street does not meet current standards for a turn around area necessary for trucks, vehicles, etc. Variance Request The applicant proposes to provide vine treatment, including vine pockets and street trees, along the wall on Edwards Street in lieu of a five foot wide landscape area required by code (see Attachment No. 4). The HBZSO stipulates that the landscape area be maintained.by a homeowner's association, property owner or other approved method. Because the proposed development will consist of public streets and not have a homeowner's association, the City would require the five foot wide landscape area as an easement and would have the responsibility for maintenance. The adjacent wall would be private, however, and maintained by the property owners. Public Works staff does not think that the vine treatment is a viable solution due to concerns about maintenance. Specifically, vines blow off into the public right-of-way, grow into the block walls accelerating their deterioration, and require more trimming than shrubs. Vines also require the same amount of spraying and weeding as other landscape materials. Public Works staff support a five foot wide. landscape area as follows: three feet of easement from the applicant and two feet from the public right-of- way. This leaves six feet available for sidewalk. See Attachment No. 13 for a conceptual drawing. The HBZSO requires that four findings be made to support a variance. The findings are: 1. The granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and under an identical zone classification. 2. Because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of the zoning ordinance is found to deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classification. 3. The granting of a variance is necessary to preserve the enjoyment of one or more substantial-property rights. 4. The granting of the,variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property in the same zone classification and is consistent with the General Plan. Planning staff thinks that the developer has a viable project without the variance and cannot make all four of the findings. Because this project is being developed on a generally regular shaped lot that will be vacant and relatively level after grading, there are no special circumstances applicable to the subject property: The variance is also not necessary to preserve one or more substantial property rights as the applicant can fully develop the site without the variance at the proposed density. As noted, the applicant states that denial of the variance would reduce the rear yards of lots along Edwards Street by five feet. These lots would still meet code requirements for minimum rear yard area. In addition, the applicant could reduce the square footage of the homes on these lots to increase their rear yards. Planning star recommends denial of the variance and approval of the landscape scenario supported by the Department of Public Works. This solution would reduce the rear yards by three(3) feet (from 20.5 feet to 17.5 feet). Staff Report- 12/12/95 11 (pcsr171) School Fees The Huntington Beach Union High School District submitted a letter dated November 1, 1995 (Attachment No. 1-4) indicating that the students generated from the proposed development would "impose a financial burden on the District due to the need for additional classroom and auxiliary space." The District projects an increase of three (3) students as a result of the project. The District explains that the standard school fees collected from the developer is not sufficient for land acquisition and construction of new school facilities and that the District would face a shortfall of approximately $54,100 beyond what State-mandated impact fees would yield for the District ($30,700). The District is requesting that the City require the developer to enter into negotiations with the District to increase the fees for mitigation of the impact of the additional students generated from their project. In recognition of City Council's recent actions on subdivisions, staff is recommending the developer meet with the school district with the intent to mitigate the potential impact on school facilities. SUMMARY: The architectural design, building setbacks, site layout and street system of the proposed development will assure the project's compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood. The site will improve drainage and minimize impacts to building bulk and privacy with minimal grading and grade differences between properties. The applicant has also proposed a mix of one and two-story homes to reflect existing development. The circulation design proposed by the applicant corrects an existing deficiency related to . fire safety. The proposed through street also benefits existing and new residents by ensuring the fastest possible response times for emergency vehicles and allows for more equitable traffic flow for the neighborhood. Staff recommends approval of the tentative tract map and conditional use permit with Madera Lane as a through-street, and denial of the variance for the following reasons: o The project is consistent with the objectives of the Low Density Residential provisions of the code in achieving a development that.has an integrated design with the existing surrounding neighborhood. Public street sections, comparable lot sizes, a mix of one and two-story units,and reducing impacts caused by grade differentials between properties-are methods used to provide a compatible project. o The project's design, including the proposed grading, properly adapts to the surrounding terrain and land uses. The project complies with the Infill Lot development standards by requiring that grading occur only to the extent necessary to provide proper drainage. The proposed wall segment along Edwards Street will match existing. o The project will not be detrimental to the general health, welfare and safety, nor detrimental or injurious to the value of property and improvements of the neighborhood or of the City in general. The project is compatible with existing land uses and will be provided with the infrastructure necessary for the development. In addition, the proposed project will provide more than the minimum parking requirement on site. o The project will correct an existing deficiency related to fire safety for the southern segment of Madera Lane. o A through street ensures the fastest possible response time. o Better overall circulation is achieved for existing residents with the proposed through street design because it provides for two (2) access points in case of emergency (accident, flooding, etc.) Staff Report- 12/12/95 12 (pcsr171) o The potential environmental impacts have been identified and analyzed under Mitigated Negative Declaration No 95-8. The review indicates that with the implementation of the recommended mitigation measures and conditions of approval, the proposed project will not have an adverse impact on the environment. • The proposed project is consistent with the Low Density Residential Land Use designation and policies contained in the Housing Element and Land Use Element by providing a variety of housing types. • The variance is not required because there are no special circumstances applicable to the property and it is not necessary to preserve property rights. The project could be developed at the same density without the variance and meet all code provisions. ALTERNATIVE ACTION(S): A. Motion to: 1. "Approve Negative Declaration No. 95-8 (Attachment No. 5);" and 2. "ApproveTentative Tract Map No. 15071 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-72 for the alternative circulation plan (Attachment No. 11) with findings and conditions of approval (Attachment No. 12);" and 3. "Deny Variance No. 95-16 with findings for denial." OR B. Motion to: 1. "Approve Negative Declaration No. 95-8 (Attachment No. 5);" and 2. "Deny Tentative Tract Map No. 15071, Conditional Use Permit No. 95-72 and Variance No. 95-16 with findings for denial." ATTACHMENTS: 1. Findings and Suggested Conditions for Approval 2. Site Plan, Floor Plans and Elevations dated November 15, 1995 3. Narrative 4. Site Plan Alternative without variance request and proposed landscape alternative dated November 29, 1995. 5. Negative Declaration No. 95-8 (Includes Environmental Checklist, Mitigation Measures, Response to Comments; and Comment Letters from Caltrans and H.B. Union High School District) 6. Subdivision Committee Minutes dated November 3, 1995 7. Letter from applicant regarding affordable housing dated December 1, 1995 8. Letter from Robert Cooper dated November 27, 1995 9. Letter from Mr. Jim Palin in opposition to Madera Lane as a through street dated December 5, 1995 10. Additional letters in opposition to Madera Lane as a through street dated December 1-6, 1995 11. Conceptual Alternate Circulation Plan 12. Conditions for Approval associated with Alternate Circulation Plan 13. Recommended Landscape Scenario for Edwards Street 14. Letter.from H.B. Union High School District dated November 1, 1995 SH:MBB:kjl Staff Report- 12/12/95 13 (pcsr171) ATTACHMENT NO. 1 FINDINGS AND SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-72/ VARIANCE NO. 95-16/ TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15071 FINDINGS OF APPROVAL- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-72: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 95-72 for the establishment, maintenance and operation of the 17 unit single family homes and for a ten foot high block wall, up to four (4) feet of which is retaining wall, along Edwards Street will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. The proposed grading, site layout and design of the subdivision properly adapts the proposed structures to streets, driveways, and other adjacent structures and uses in a harmonious manner. The street improvements for Madera Lane will match the improvements on the existing segments of Madera Lane where practical. The proposed project will comply with the City of Huntington Beach infill ordinance and has proposed a mix of one and two story units that are compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. The block wall along Edwards Street will match existing wall segments on either side of Edwards Street. 2. The proposed use will comply with the provisions of the base district which is Low Density Residential and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and any specific condition required for the proposed use in the district-.in which it would be located. The proposed project meets all provisions of the code, including lot size, setbacks, density, and parking requirements. The wall height along Edwards Streets is permitted with a conditional use permit. 3. The granting of the conditional use permit for construction of the 17 single family.units will not adversely affect the General Plan. It is consistent with the Land Use Element designation of Residential Low Density on the subject property. In addition, it is consistent with the following goals and policies of the General Plan: a. The attainment of decent housing within a satisfying living environment for households of all socioeconomic, racial and ethnic groups in Huntington Beach. (Housing Element) b. To encourage and maintain a well balance variety of residential densities and uncrowded living environments by encouraging rational use of land and other natural resources. (Land Use Element) Attachment- 12/12/95 (pcsr171-14) FINDINGS FOR DENIAL- VARIANCE NO. 95-16: 1. The granting Variance No. 95-16 to permit no landscape area along Edwards Street in lieu of a five (5) foot wide area is not necessary to preserve the enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights. The site can be fully developed at permitted densities and meet all provisions of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance while providing the landscape area. 2. There are no special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, that make the strict application of the zoning ordinance deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classification. The subject lot will be vacant after demolition of structures and is a generally regular shaped area. The project design incorporates fill that will level the site, therefore, topography is not an obstacle to incorporating the landscape area. FINDINGS OF APPROVAL - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15071: 1. The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan, or other applicable provisions of this Code. Tentative Tract Map No. 15071 for a 17 single family detached unit subdivision is consistent with the goals and policies of the Huntington Beach General Plan, including the Housing and Land Use Elements. 2. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of development. The site is relatively flat and physically suitable for the proposed density of six units per net acre. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time that the General Plan designation of Low Density Residential'(7 units per acre), and Residential Low Density zoning were implemented. The size, depth, frontage, street width, and other design features of the. proposed subdivision are in compliance with the standard plans and specifications on file with the City as well as in compliance with.the State Subdivision Map Act and the supplemental City Subdivision Ordinance. The proposed single family residential subdivision is designed to . integrate with the existing neighborhood with public streets and sidewalks. 3. The design of-the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not cause serious health problems or substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Planning Commission or Zoning Administrator may approve such a tentative map if an environmental impact report was prepared with respect to the project and a finding was made that specific economic, social or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report. The environmental assessment for the project concludes that the project, with mitigation measures, will have a less than significant effect on the environment. Attachment- 12/12/95 (pcsr171-15) 4. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision unless alternative easements, for access or for use, will be provided. The subdivision will provide all necessary easements and will not affect any existing easements. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15071: 1., The tentative tract map received and dated November 15, 1995 shall be the approved layout with the following modifications: a. Revise map to show a three foot landscape easement along the easterly edge of the site, adjacent to Edwards Street. 2. The following conditions are required to be completed prior to recordation of the final map unless otherwise stated. Bonding may be substituted for construction in accordance with provisions of the subdivision map act. (PW) a. The following shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach: 1. The water system and appurtenances. 2. The sewer system and appurtenances. 3. The two foot public utility easement. 4. Three foot landscape easement adjacent to Edwards Street. 5. Sub-surface water rights. b. All streets shall be dedicated to the public. c. All vehicular access rights to Edwards Street shall_be released,and relinquished to-the City of Huntington Beach. d. Any existing water service shall be abandoned, at the main, per Public Works Water Division specifications. e. Fire hydrant locations shall be approved by the Fire Department. f. Hydrology and hydraulic studies shall be submitted for Public Works review and approval and shall address the provisions of Chapter 222 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, including.Section 222.1 OC. g. A sewer study shall be submitted for Public Works approval. The developer shall design and construct the sewer system required to serve the development. h. The developer shall install new curb,gutter and sidewalk and retaining wall on Edwards Street, adjacent to the tract boundary, per Public Works requirements. Attachment- 12/12/95 (pcsrl7l-16) i. The developer shall remove and replace the existing paving to centerline on Edwards Street, adjacent to the tract boundary, per Public Works requirements. A service life of 20 years shall be provided for. j. The proposed sidewalks on Madera Lane shall meet A.D.A. and Public Works Standards as depicted on the site plan. k. Underground.all existing dry utilities along Edwards Street. 1. Signing, striping and street lighting shall be designed and constructed in accordance with Public Works Standards. m. Drainage flows from adjacent properties shall not be obstructed. Flows shall be accommodated per Public Works Standards. n. On-site drainage shall not be directed to adjacent properties, but shall be handled by a Public Works approved method. o. The engineer or surveyor preparing the final map shall-tie the boundary of the map into the Horizontal Control System established by the County Surveyor in a manner described in Sections 7-9-330 and 7-9-337 of the Orange County Subdivision Code and Orange County Subdivision.Manual, Subarticle 18. p. The engineer or surveyor preparing the final map shall submit to the County Surveyor a digital-graphics file of said map in a manner described in Sections 7-9-330 and 7-9-337 of the Orange County Subdivision Code and Orange County Subdivision Manual, Subarticle 18. q. Lot 16 shall have a 10 ft. by 10 ft. corner cut-off providing site distance to lot 1.7. r. Lot 6 shall have a 10 ft. by 10 ft. corner cut-off providing site distance to lot 32 of Tract 5601. The developer shall attempt to quitclaim the 10 ft. by 1-0 ft. area to said lot 32. Any re-construction necessary, such as block walls, landscaping, etc. shall be at the developers expense. 3. Prior to submittal of the final map for approval by the City Council, the following shall be required: a. An Affordable Housing Agreement Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Department. The plan shall provide for minimum 10 percent of the housing units (equal mix of two units) approved to be affordable to families of low and moderate income level (average 100% of Orange County median) for a period of thirty years. Said plan shall be executed prior to issuance of the first building permit for the tract. The affordable units shall be under construction, of available to the public, prior to final building permit approval (occupancy) of the first home. Attachment- 12/12/95 (pcsrl7l-17) b. The developer shall meet with the appropriate school districts with the intent to mitigate the impact on school facilities. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15071: 1. All applicable.Public Works fees shall be paid prior to map recordation. (PW) 2. Park and Recreation Fees shall be paid prior to acceptance of the final map by City Council or at issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. 3. Tentative Tract Map No. 15071 acid Conditional.Use.Permit No. 95-72 shall become null and void unless exercised within two (2)years of the date of final approval. An extension of time may be granted by the Planning Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Division a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. 4. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of$25 for the posting of the Notice of Determination at the County of Orange Clerk's Office. The check shall be made out to the County of Orange and submitted to the Department of Community Development within two (2) days of the Planning Commission's action. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-72: 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated November 15, 1995 shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following modifications: a. Revise site plan to show a three foot landscape easement along the easterly edge of the site. 2. Prior to any demolition, grading or excavating activity, the following shall be completed: a. The applicant shall provide thirty days written notice to the City of Huntington Beach Historic Resources Board. The Board will document the structures and equipment on site. b. Any asbestos contained therein shall be identified and removed in compliance with City, State and Federal standards, including an asbestos abatement program to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and Building Official.* c. A contingency plan-shall be submitted for review and approval to the Huntington Beach Fire Department. The plan will identify procedures and contacts for instances when hazardous substances are encountered on-site.* Attachment- 12/12/95 (pcsr171-18) d. Any pesticides or other hazardous substances contained on the site or in the structures shall be identified and removed in compliance with City, State and Federal standards.* .3. Prior to submittal for building permits, the following shall be completed: a. Names of streets shall be approved by the Huntington Beach Fire Department prior to use in accordance with City Specification No. 429. (FD) b. .Submit three (3) copies of the site plan to the Planning Division for addressing purposes after street name approval by the Fire Department. c. Depict all utility apparatus, such as but not limited to back flow devices and Edison transforms, on the site plan. They shall be prohibited in the front and exterior yard setbacks unless properly screened by landscaping or other method as approved by the Community Development Director. d. Floor plans shall depict natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at the location of clothes dryers; natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units; and low-volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. e. If foil-type insulation is to be used, a fire retarding type shall be installed as approved by the Building Department and indicated on the floor plans. f. If outdoor lighting is included, high-pressure sodium vapor lamps or similar energy. savings lamps shall be used. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage". onto adjacent properties and shall be noted on the site plan and elevations. g. The site plan shall include(or reference page) all conditions of approval imposed on the project printed verbatim. Model numbers, lot numbers and street names shall be depicted on the site plan. 4. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the-following shall be completed: a. Wall plans shall be submitted and approved by the Department of Community Development. Double walls shall be prohibited; prior to the construction of any new walls, a plan must be submitted identifying the removal of any existing walls next to the new wall, and shall include necessary homeowner's approval. b. A plan for silt control for all water runoff from the property during construction and initial operation of the project may be required if deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works. (PW) Attachment- 12/12/95 (pcsr171-19) 5. Prior to issuance of building permits, the following shall be completed: a. Submit copy of the revised site plan, floor plans and elevations pursuant to Condition No. 1 for review and approval and inclusion in the entitlement file. In addition, the following information shall be noted on the plans: 1. Buildings on lots 10 and 12 shall have an automatic sprinkler system installed throughout to comply with Huntington Beach Fire Department and Uniform Building Code Standards. Shop drawings shall be submitted to and approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. A two inch water service is required for automatic sprinklers. (FD) 2. Two new fire hydrants shall be installed prior to combustible construction. Shop drawings shall be submitted to the Public Works Department and approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. (FD) 3. Address numbers will be installed to comply with City Specification No. 428.(FD) b. A grading plan, prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval (by issuance of a grading permit). (PW) c. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered engineer. This analysis shall include on-site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations for grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations, retaining walls, streets, and utilities. (PW) d. The-applicant shall submit a site plan depicting the Model homes/sales office, and parking lot locations to the Department of Community Development for review and approval. e. The Final Map shall be accepted by the City Council, recorded with the Orange County Recorder and a copy filed with the Department of Community Development. f. Final design elevations of grading shall not vary from elevations shown on the tentative map by more than one (1) foot. (PW) g. A Street Improvement Plan, prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public Works Department. (PW) Attachment- 12/12/95 (pcsr171-20) h. A Landscape Construction Set must be submitted to the Departments of Community Development and Public Works and must be approved. The Landscape Construction Set shall include a.landscape plan prepared and signed by a State Licensed Landscape Architect which includes all proposed/existing plan materials (location, type, size, quantity), an irrigation plan, a grading plan, an approved site plan, and a copy of the entitlement conditions of approval. The landscape plans shall be in conformance with Chapter 231 of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. The set must be approved by both departments prior to issuance.of building permits. (PW) i. An erosion control plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works. (PW) j. The developer shall submit a separate utility plan, showing water system improvements including service connections to each building; fire hydrant, valves, backflow devices and other appurtenances in accordance with applicable U.P.C., City Ordinances, Public Works Standards and Water Division design criteria. These plans.shall be approved prior to any construction by the Public Works Water Division and the City of Huntington Beach Fire Department. (PW) k. Abandon the existing on-site water well per State codes. (PW) 1. Submit a letter of map revision from FEMA declaring the tract exempt from floodplain requirements or submit copy of completed FEMA EIevation Certificates for each unit. m. Submit a construction vehicle control plan to Department of Public Works for review and approval. n. An-interim parking and/or building materials storage plan shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development to assure adequate parking is available for employees, customers, contractors, etc., during the project's construction phase. o. Installation or removal of underground flammable or combustible liquid storage tanks shall comply with Orange County Environmental Health and Huntington Beach Fire Department requirements. p. The placement and storage of the diesel tank(s) or any flammable substance shall be reviewed and approved by the Huntington Beach Fire Department prior to construction. 6. During construction, the applicant shall: a. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems in all areas where vehicles travel to keep damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site: b. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day; Attachment- 12/12/95 (pcsr 171-21) c. Use low sulfur fuel (.05%) by weight for construction equipment; d. Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days (first stage smog alerts); e. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts. 7. Prior to final building permit approval of the first single family unit, the following shall be completed: a. Pursuant to a landscape plan reviewed and approved by the Departments of Public Works and Community Development, the applicant shall replace the 18 inch (trunk size) Podacarpus at a 1:1 ratio, relocate (transplant)the-12 inch Windmill Palm and save the three Plumeria bushes (four inches each). All trees will replaced/relocated on site. b. If the tract is not considered exempt by FEMA, a second Elevation Certificate will be required for each unit "as built". c. All improvements (including landscaping) to the property shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans and conditions of approval specified herein. d. Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein shall be accomplished. e. A reproducible mylar copy of the recorded final map, along with a digital graphics file of the recorded map, shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works. (PW)- f. The::applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the SouthCoast Air Quality Management District and submit a copy to Community Development Department. g. All building spoils, such.a unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. 8. Construction shall be limited to 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM Monday - Friday and 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM on Saturday. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays_and Federal holidays INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-72: 1. Traffic Impact Fees shall be paid at the time of final building inspection of the first unit. (PW) 2. A construction permit shall be required for all work within the public right-of-way. (PW) 3. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, Building Division, and Fire Department as well as applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards. Attachment- 12/12/95 (pcsr171-22) 4. State-mandate school impact fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. 5. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Conditional Use Permit No. 95-72 and Variance No. 95-16, pursuant to a public hearing, if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance or Municipal Code occurs:. * Mitigation Measure Attachment- 12/12/95 (pcsr171-23) BROADMOOR HOMES eroadmoor Homes 5405 Oberlin Drive, Suite 200 Southwest, Inc. San Diego, CA 92121 619-455-9454 Fax 619-455-7449 August 7, 1995 Ms. Mary Beth Ormsby, AICP City.of Huntington Beach Department of Community Development 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 Re: ProPosed Tentative Map 15071 Dear Ms. Ormsby: Attached you will find our application for Tentative Tract Map, Conditional Use Permit and Variance requests for the property located at 1730I Edwards Street, Huntington Beach. The existing zoning of the property is currently R-I Low Density Residential. The property was previously used as a greenhouse/nursery for cut flowers. Recently the owners have retired from the business and now no longer operate the business. The existing home on the property is not occupied, and has not been for the past several years. The property is bounded on the north; west and south by single family residences which are both one and two story structures. Adjacent homes were built in the early to mid 1960's. We are requesting approval from the City to subdivide and develop the property into 17 single family detached homes. Minimum lot size would be 6,000 square feet with an average lot size of 7,100 square feet for the project. Average density for the project would-be 4.6 dwelling units per. acre. Streets and street improvements (utilities)-will all be public. Construction of these improvements and the individual homes will begin directly after approval of the Final Map. Anticipated construction is scheduled for early 1996. Street tree plantings as.required by the City Park and Street Tree Department will be provided to all lots within the proposed project. ., The development will be a standard single family subdivision with one and two story architecture of a traditional design theme intended to blend into the existing neighborhood. No homeowner's association is proposed for the project. We look forward to the opportunity to work with the City of Huntington Beach. Please feel free to call if you have any further questions. Sincerely, 'Michael Chau Executive Vice President A Tradition of Excellence Since 1959 ATTACHMENT NO. 3. 1 EDWARDS STREETSCAPE ANALYSIS TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 15071 lDtl Ulil Lm1 ID[[ I Imf � EnfIINt Y/IosmRr INRNO I � f Filrmrc T[olroRrib[N� .� I E[nnD[:sn[n TR[tlRWO.0 1 _ _ • . 1[RGR YARD I[RGR YARD If Rua YA[o A ERDi1NDWALL—i—N[w WAtt—) I----NEW WA[[----[il[nNGWALL N[w S1R[R iR[tl a W O.0 E.M.Vnl!RANIINr•ON WALL OPTION M2 PLAN VIEW Edwards St ml i fml IAlfl tml I [ml I Lmf I � I D ERn,DR,A[ns,D.r ttlN[O I I . 1 OnftIND Two biwrllofm D ERnnNC En[R Ta[[faWgC WR[AR YARD I WRGR YARD MRGRYARo VIN[RIOtEIR� /RniK SiD[wAI[ EAnllfID WALL —N[WWA[L•� •r• (----Nn+WA1L—I.—b3m—W.Au—� N[wsn[n YR[[[/snC.-- I —EwfnNG VRa[rL.AMR[GdwAIL , mVW[RANTNG ON WALL-- OPTION#1 PLAN VIEW x•nr.W.r Edwards St—1 Z O BROADMOOR HOMES Southwest Inc. frfoA.w.n.IlR wGs.uwm uwmww EDWARDS STREETSCAPE ANALYSIS J TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 15071 J NeW 3—"T.Us awn.S lnlnNc green lam•wnc ea/TsIOTrlV g/oar tloNn (^�-- T enmrro TWoslogrgoln sNaln eLANTI 1p (— Fm Wu—I—Ne WLl ) , Naw WLL-1—e —WLL� Edwaids Sheet p-rjlTwi VMPLANT QOW Wu OPTION d12 ELEVATION lCALlr—r e. emrlNGgnetTTtFaew0.G -Naw gnenhvfawac • D Tmsmllf Y • T' •• 'NNl F14[n— vua MNllwG twl WLL ;' + ( emrwwall__ NIWWLL--j, ( New(Nall —e.3—WA. . Edwards Slnrl enema:vrn RANIIwG ONwna m OPTION N1 ELEVATION scau r.wr BROADMOOR HOMES Southwest Inc. lwaL.w.a.laa s..oyL oaw �rosWr SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE MINUTES November 3, 1995 Room B-8, Civic Center 3:00 P.M. Subdivision Committee Planning Commissioners Present: Fred Speaker, Tom Livengood, Ed Kerins Subdivision Committee Staff Members Present: Scott Hess(Community Development), Dave Webb (Public.Works), Ward Kinsman (Fire Department) Staff Present: Mary Beth Broeren Applicant Present: Gene Hirao, Gary Dokich TENTATIVE TRACT INTO. 15071: APPLICANT/SUBDIVIDER: Broadmoor Homes Southwest, Inc. ENGINEER: MD S Consulting Tentative Tract No. 15071 is.a request for the subdivision of approximately 3.7 acres into 17 lots. The parcel is zoned RL-FP2 (Low Density Residential-Flood Plain) and is located at 17301 Edwards Street, 600 feet north of Slater Avenue. r Community Development Comments: Mary Beth Broeren, staff' planner, presented the tentative map and described the project. It consists of 17 detached single family units. The project complies with the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach and the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, with the exception of a variance request for no landscape area along Edwards Street (five [5] foot wide area required). Located in the floodplain, the project will be required to comply with FEMA guidelines. The developer expects that the site will receive an exemption because the two (2) surrounding tracts are exempt. Stan discussed that double walls would not be allowed, the developer will preserve existing walls where feasible. Staff explained that grade differentials between the project site and surrounding area will be minimized and in most cases are less than one (1) foot. Staff reviewed recommended conditions of approval (attached), including an affordable housing plan, and recommended mitigation measures. The project will also be required to comply with the infill ordinance. Staff noted that affected agencies and property owners within 300 feet and along key access points to the site were notified about the Subdivision Committee meeting. Six (6) phone calls were received, none voiced opposition to the project. One (1) caller asked staff to consider not extending Madera Lane to the south but to have all traffic for the proposed subdivision gain access from the north via Athena Drive. ATTACHMENT NO. _�1 November 3,1995 Subdivision Com_ _etes • Page 2 Public Works Comments: Dave Webb, Principal Engineer, reviewed recommended conditions of approval, including undergrounding of utilities and site angle visibility on two (2) of the lots. Fire Department Comments: Staff reviewed recommended conditions of approval, including fire sprinklers on two (2) flag lots and two (2) new fire hydrants. Subdivision Committee Member Comments: Commissioner.Speaker inquired about the different sidewalk treatments on Madera Lane and the necessity for sprinklers for units on the flag lots. Staff responded that on the west side of Madera Lane, the parkway would be adjacent to the private lots. This is because side yards face Madera Lane and the parkway area is more likely to be maintained if directly adjacent to the lots. On the east side of Madera Lane, the sidewalk and parkway would be reversed to match improvements on the existing segments of Madera Lane. Staff will also verify if sprinklers must be provided. Commissioner Livengood asked for clarification on the sidewalk width along Edwards Street and requested that a site plan with the landscape area be presented at the Planning Commission public hearing. He asked that changes/additions be made to the recommended conditions of approval regarding: 1) payment of State mandated school fees, 2) hours of construction, be reduced; and 3) clarify wording for the undergrounding of utilities. Commissioner Kerins stated the importance of the landscape area along Edwards Street. Discussion continued on the alternative site configuration suggested by a resident of Madera Lane for no southern access from Madera Lane to the proposed tract. Staff noted concerns regarding compliance with Fire Department requirements for street lengths and traffic circulation. Developer Comments: Gary Dokich asked for clarification on several conditions, including utility undergrounding, quit claim for lot 6, and the affordable housing plan. He stated that in lieu of the landscape area, the developer could provide block wall treatment and/or vine pockets. COMMISSIONER SPEAKER MAKE A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP NO. 15071 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS AND FORWARD TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION. COMMISSIONER LIVENGOOD SECONDED.THE MOTION AND IT PASSED UNANIMOUSLY (6-0). (g:subdiv:min 1) ATTACHMENT NO. . �y.2 November 3,1995 Subdivision Com. utes • Page 3 Recommended Conditions: 1. Comply with department recommended conditions of approval as modified. 2. Add a condition about the payment of State mandated school fees. 3. The hours of construction be reduced to reflect the surrounding residential area. 4. The wording for the undergrounding of utilities be clarified. (g:subdiv:min 1) ATTA��'•N.MENT NCB. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15071: 1. The tentative tract map received and dated November 15, 1995 shall be the approved layout with the following modifications: a. Revise map to show a five foot landscape easement along the easterly edge of the site. 2. The following conditions are required to be completed prior to recordation of the final map unless otherwise stated. Bonding may be substituted for construction in accordance with provisions of the subdivision map act. (PW) a. The following shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach: 1. The water system and appurtenances. 2. The sewer system and appurtenances. I The two foot public utility easement. 4. Five foot landscape easement adjacent to Edwards Street. 5. Sub-surface water rights. b. All streets shall be dedicated to the public. c. All vehicular access rights to Edwards Street shall be released and relinquished to the City of Huntington Beach. d. Any existing water service shall be abandoned, at the main, per Public Works Water Division specifications. e. Fire hydrant locations shall be approved by the Fire Department. f. Hydrology and hydraulic studies shall be submitted for Public Works review and approval. g. A sewer study shall be submitted for Public Works approval. The developer shall design and construct the sewer system required to serve the development. h. The developer shall install new curb, gutter and sidewalk and retaining wall on Edwards Street, adjacent to the tract boundary., per Public Works requirements. i. The developer shall remove and replace the existing paving to centerline on Edwards . Street, adjacent to the tract boundary, per Public Works requirements. A service life of 20 years shall be provided for. j. The proposed sidewalks on Madera Lane shall meet A.D.A. and Public Works Standards. k. Underground all existing dry utilities along Edwards Street. ATTACHMENT NO. (D-A l.. Signing, striping and street lighting shall be designed and constructed in accordance with Public Works Standards. m. Drainage flows from adjacent properties shall not be obstructed. Flows shall be accommodated per Public Works Standards. n. On-site drainage shall not be directed to adjacent properties, but shall be handled by a Public Works approved method. o. The engineer or surveyor preparing the final map shall tie the boundary of the map into the Horizontal Control System established by the County Surveyor in a manner described.in Sections 7-9-330 and 7-9-337 of the Orange County Subdivision Code and Orange County Subdivision Manual, Subarticle 18. p. The engineer or surveyor preparing the final map shall submit to the County Surveyor a digital-graphics file of said map in a manner described in Sections 7-9-330 and 7-9-337 of the Orange County Subdivision Code and Orange County Subdivision Manual, Subarticle 18. q. Lot 16 shall have a 10 ft. by 10 ft. corner cut-off providing site distance to lot 17. r. Lot 6 shall have a 10 ft. by 10 ft. corner cut-off providing site distance to lot 32 of Tract 5601. The developer shall attempt to quitclaim the 10 ft. by I0 ft. area to said lot 32. Any re-construction necessary, such as block walls, landscaping, etc. shall be at the developers expense. 3. An Affordable Housing Agreement Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Department prior to submittal of the final map for approval by City Council. The plan shall provide for minimum 10 percent of the housing units (equal mix of two units) approved to be affordable to families of low and moderate income level(average 100% of Orange County median). Said plan shall be executed prior to issuance of the first building permit for the tract. The affordable units shall be under construction, or available to _. the public, prior to final building permit approval (occupancy) of the first home. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REOUIREMENTS: 1. All applicable Public Works fees -shall be paid prior to map recordation. (PW) 2. Park and Recreation Fees shall be paid prior to acceptance of the final map by City Council or at issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. 3. Tentative Tract Map No. 15071 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-72 shall become null and void unless exercised within two (2)years of the date of final approval. An extension of time may be granted by the Planning Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Division a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. ATTACHMENT N.O. � may be granted by the Planning Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Division a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. 4. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of$25 for the posting of the Notice of Determination at the County of Orange Clerk's Office. The check shall be made out to the County of Orange and submitted to the Department of Community Development within two (2) days of the Planning Commission's action. ATTACHMENT NO. (�,� BROADMOURLtOMES Broadmoor Homes• 5405 Oberlin Drive, Suite 200 Southwest, Inc. San Diego, CA 92121 619-455-9454 Fax 619-455-7449 November 30, 1995 =s Mrs. Mary Beth Broeren, AICP City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department - 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 9264$ Re: Affordable Housing Agreement for Tentative Tract I5071. Dear Mrs Broeren, As part of the Affordable Housing requirement for the above Tentative Tract Map we are required to provide 2 units that meet the affordable housing criteria. We have established an agreement with Mr. Steve Perry of Bridges America and Mr. Kirk Evans of Cehterstone to facilitate the affordable housing requirement in the Bridges America project. It is our understanding that the City and Bridges America--have-an approved Deed Restriction that, we will use to transfer our affordable housing requirement to their project. Please feel free to call me at any time if you have any questions or need any further information. Sincerely, Michael Chau Executive Vice President ATTACHMENT N0. A Tradition of Excellence Since 1959 Kin 2 7 1995 17231 Kristopher Lane -.. Huntington Beach CA 92647 November 19 , 1995 Mary Beth Broeren Assistant Planner Planning Commission 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach CA 92648 Dear Ms . Broeren: After speaking to one of your co-workers , vane Madera, I sent the attached letter to nineteen of my neighbors . After 20 years of living on Kristopher Lane I find it necessary to complain . The traffic noise is truly loud , both day and night . All the new developments at the end of Edwards Street seem to feed their vehicles behind our homes . I am asking that you folks not only plan for the future be look after the people who are already in place . When the current and future homes were built on Edwards , Garfield and beyond , both Golder_ West and Springdale were listed as entrance/exit streets and Edwards was not a through or connector street. Obviously the plans have been changed but our street has not been soundproofed as the others have been. Please look into my request. I am available at 842-3060 for discut'sion. Thank You, ATTACHMENT NO. November 17, 1995 .Dear Kristopher Lane Neighbor: Last month we received notification (attached)that seventeen houses may be built behind us on Edwards Street,between Athens and Slater. They are in addition to the 300 or more houses either approved or under construction at the south end of Edwards at Garfield.. I'm sure you have already noticed an increase in vehicle noise day and night, and as more houses are built, more cars will be using Edwards Street. We can not stop development but we can and should have protection from the added traffic noise created by the velucies associated with the new houses. Please consider the following: ❑ Bring your concern about the increased (and increasing)traffic on Edwards to the attention of the Planning Cornrnission. ❑_ Request that the height of the East side wall from_Shenlyn to Wrenfield-be raised. It is currently 8 feet high on the street but only 5 feet high on the residence side due to a grading differential. Two or three additional feet will provide a great sound block. 01 Contact the planning commission at 2000 Mai*:Street, Huntington Beach, 92648 in writing outhe assistant planner handling our subdivision,Mary Beth Broeren(.714)536-5271. ❑ If enough of us complain,the City will have to do something about the noise pollution. A�i TA.GHI ENT-140. g .2. 17391 Madera Ln. UIL C 0 5 1995 Huntington Bch, CA Dec. 5, 1995 RE: Ten Tract No. 1 71 Dear rd Zelefsky We property owners on the south side of proposed project Tent. Tract 15071 are very disappointed that our request to have Madera remain as a dead end street (which it has been for the past 28 plus years ) has not yet been agreed to by Public Works (P W) and Fire Departments. As I have informed Planning on several different occasions, the majority of the owners on Madera south of the existing nursery property would very much like to have all City Departments agree on this design of Madera so we do not have to go against staff recommendation at the Planning In Commission Public Hearing. With ha ., ony in such an agreement, the project could fly through the Planning Commission. Also revisions on the tract of an additional lot and Madera as a dead end street could be worked out prior to the public hearing. Sheet flow could be designed to the north on this revised subdivision with Public Works oversight. Following are some design ideas which could be used on a revised map by placing both the sewer and water mains in a 10 or 15 ft..easement through one lot to accommodate the interconnect of utilities, and per P W the drainage can sheet flow to the north which should eliminate Public Work's desire to have Madera as a through street Also Madera could be terminated at the south property line with a Standard Plan developed for this type of street closure and used before in the City without setting a precedent here on Madera. • It would appear that the homes on Madera south of the nursery property can best be served (shortest distance ) from Slater Ave. by both fire stations on Gothard Ave. as well as the Lake St. station and the new project should be served from Edwards-whether Madera is a through street or not. The point of convergence for fire equipment would be close to the intersection of Madera and Santa Inez for both the Warner Ave. and Heil Ave. Fire Stations if either station responded via easteriv on Slater Ave. or southerly on Edwards Street;therefore, even if Madera was to be constructed as a through street the.response time would only be improved by 3 or 5 seconds at the most by approaching from the north for a few existing homes on Madera. • If the Fire Dept. insists on being able to lay hose on the way in from the north, this task can be accomplished through the use of paver blocks on an easement over the sewer and water lines, with.a locked gate on its south end for fire access only. We as home owners on the south side of the proposed project feel we should be allowed to . retain the dead end street, since to construct Madera through as proposed on Tract 15071 would • accommodate heavy through traffic from both north and west of our area: • adversely affect drainage with the project draining south to the storm drain catch basin on Morro Bay as submitted: • we may lose our exemption from the flood insurance requirement when we sell or refinance our property for the-following reasons : existing design of Madera is changed to a through street , the elevation of subject property to our north is to be lowered and no structure such as a block wall is left to block flood flow down Madera . ATTACHMENT NO. Madera as a through street is a very poor design with access points onto two different arterial highways which is not that common in the city . This proposed layout in design will only increase thefts(burglaries) by creating good escape routs, increase noise, and drastically increase speeds on a street used by children for these past 28 plus years. If Fire had wanted Madera as a through street , the city should have Precise Planned it years ago,then all original, as well as the more recent property owners, would have been told of the intent for a through street As a side note, of the 15 homes constructed facing on Madera south of subject property,9 were originally constructed having wood roofs ( shake or shingle ) of which only 2 of these wood roofs remain and these 2 homes are approx. 200 hundred feet apart at 17382 and 17432 respectively and each being accessible from both Madera and Edwards. These changes in roofing material type has greatly reduced fire hazard in this area and further reduced the need for Madera as a through street. There are other concerns on the Neeative Declaration 95-8 which should be looked into for the protection of the future property owners such as • drain tiles(pipes) used in this area when the property was under an agriculture use and how thev will be handled. i.e. crushed in place, removed and will there be a chemical analysis of the residue existing in and around these pipes. • there should also be a chemical analysis of the soil around total site for. i.e. herbicides and pesticides from the nursery operation . as well as petroleum products from the farm equipment if and when it was stored on subject property when,used for farming. • old oil field operation records in the Fire Dept should be researched to deterruned if there was ever an oil well on subject property. • rodent control is also of some concern to surrounding property owners as we have not heard the owl this past summer; therefore, the rodent population has more than likely increased dramatically so a rodent eradication program should be required prior to any demolition on this Property. In closing I would like to thank staff for the help to date and state that the carrot for the developer would be to be given permission to improve one more lot in the subdivision and additional savings resulting from not having to construct a 100 ft.long,60 ft.wide street section. This money could then be used to improve Madera as a dead end street. Such treatment should also make a much more private development which could help the sales grogram for the project and create less traffic impacts on the completed development and homes to the north. The object of these letters is not to delay this project but to impress on the staff that a majority of the 15 property owners on Madera south of T T 15071 most adversely affected by this development as submitted are in favor of the proposal being approved at P C without having to appeal to the City Council for a decision on Madera as a dead end street. Sincere] Gum Jim Palin 1 i-ACHMENT NO. +. ; JACKIE & BRIAN LESSER 17392 MADERA LANE HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 NOVEMBER 30 , 1995 P MARY BETH BROEREN, ASSISTANT PLANNER DEC 0 11995 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT i'_ ` i..•rlf Cis".' jr. 2000 -MAIN STREET ;. :m C. HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 DEAR MS BROEREN, AS RESIDENTS ON MADERA LANE, WE ARE QUITE DISTRESSED OVER (TT15071) THE PLAN TO OPEN OUR SIRE T. NORTH TO ATHENA DR. WHEN WE BOUGHT OUR HOME IN 1991, A DECIDING FACTOR WAS THE ADVANTAGE OF LIVING ON A QUIET DEAD END STREET. WE'RE AFRAID THAT WITH ACCESS TO MADERA FROM BOTH SLATER AND FROM EDWARDS , THERE WILL BE AN INCREASE IN NOISE, TRAFFIC, AND HIGHER SPEEDS. WHAT HAS BEEN A CRIME FREE STREET WILL HAVE THE POTENTIAL, FOR ROBBERIES GIVEN THIS NEW ACCESS. OUR UNDERSTANDING IS THAT THERE HAD NEVER BEEN ANY ALTERNATE PLANS ON RECORD TO OPEN MADERA. HEAD THERE BEEN, WE WOULD HAVE BEEN TOLD OF THAT POSSIBILITY AND COULD HAVE MADE A MORE INFORMED DECISION CONCERNING- THE PURCHASE OF OUR HOME. WITH AS MANY FIRE STATIONS AS THERE ARE IN THE AREA THAT COULD RESPOND TO AN EMERGENCY IN THIS TRACT, NO ONE CAN CONVINCE US THAT THE RESPONSE TIME WILL BE REDUCED, TO SUCH AN EXTENT BY OPENING THE STREET, THAT IT'S BENEFIT WILL OUTWEIGH THE CHANGES THAT RESIDENTS OF MADERA LANE WILL BE FORCED TO LIVE WITH. WE UNDERSTAND THAT IF THE FIRE DEPARTMENT REMAINS ADAMANT ABOUT HAVING ACCESS TO BOTH SIDES OF THE DEAD END, OTHER ALTERNATIVES ARE AVAILABLE INCLUDING A LOCKED GATE THAT ONLY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT COULD ACCESS. IN CLOSING, WE HOPE THAT YOU WILL TAKE OUR CONCERNS SERIOUSLY. CLEARLY, YOUR FINAL DECISION SHOULD BE THAT MADERA LANE BE LEFT A DEAD END STREET. SINCERELY, cc Howard Zelefsky ATTACHMENT Nth. 10. DEC p 41995 12/1/95 Mary Beth Broeren Wayne K. Phillips Assistant Planner, City of H.B. 17441 Madera Lane Department of Community Development H.B., CA 92647 P.O. Box 190 714/841-1904 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mary, This letter is being written in response to the proposed.project T T1 5071. My family and I ha,,-e lived on Madera Lane on the south side of the proposed project for the past 16 years. One of the reasons that we choose this location was that there was no through traffic. While we are not opposed to having the subject land developed, we do, however, oppose the expected traffic that will certainly result from the proposed plan. As I understand the proposal, both heavily travelled streets, Slater and Edwards, would be linked via Madera Lane. This provides a short cut for anyone traveling cast on Slater or south on Edwards wanting to bypass the common signal controlled intersection and associated traffic. This is not just a potential problem, but almost a guaranteed result. Presently, anyone approaching this intersection experiences the aggressiveness of impatient drivers, and a review of the HBPD records should confirm that this is an accident prone intersection. Once the proposed short cut is a reality, it will take very little time for the word to get out to the very impatient drivers that want to avoid the bottle neck. The proposal poses another concerr. with the potential for increasing crime in the area. Any law inforcement organization will tell you that dead end streets have iess crime because there is no get away route. Establishing almost direct access between two very-busy streets is just inviting trouble. Again, we are not against development of the designated area, but certainly a better plan can be proposed which allows development while still minimizing the safety and security of the neighborhood. Thanks for your time, Wayndek. Phillips Spokesman for family of four �'t! Itit�F�ty�&NT NO. ��. November 30, 1995 Ms. Mary Beth Broeren, Assistant Planner DEC 0 41995 Department of Community Development P.O. Box 190 2000 Maine Street Huntington Beach, CA. 92648 Dear Ms. Broeren: This correspondence is with respect to the proposed changes, now under consideration by the city, dealing with the 17400 block of Madera Lane. Presently Madera Lane, in the specific area mentioned, concludes with a dead-end brought about by a brickwall that forms a portion of the parameter of what used to be. a wholesale nursery. The property occupied by the defunct nursery has been sold and a development has been proposed that would result in new homes being constructed on the site. One troubling aspect of this new construction, for myself as well as most of my neighbors, is that the dead-end would be removed and Madera Lane opened up to through traffic. Speaking for myself, although I can clearly assure you that this is by far the general sentiment of all those residing on this particular portion of Madera Lane, this is not something I feel is in the best interest of the neighborhood or to those who reside there. Surely you must clearly realize that a common and significant attraction or incentive to all of us who at one time undertook the decision to move into this quiet neighborhood, was exactly-that the street didn't go through. As the father of a small daughter, when I moved into the ;neighborhood, the limited amount of vehicular traffic was most appealing. I have been advised that the City Fire Department is a major contributing factor in the proposal to open the street to through traffic. I an employed in a similar role and from both my personal experience and that of a Madera Lane resident, I don't believe that their reasoning or concerns are all that compelling. If nothing else, and recognizing that the City of Huntington Beach is .fortunate to have one of the more outstanding Fire Departments in the entire state and well beyond, they have never experienced any notable problems when responding to a .call for service in this neighborhood during the better part of the two decades I 've resided here. If the concerns now surfacing were or are so significant, why then were they not addressed previously, over the period of the . last twenty plus years? A-FTA,"WENT NO. 103 The more I become aware of the various elements that collectively must be considered dealing with the pending proposal, I 've yet to learn of one that clearly hobbles any city service whatsoever. I may need to be corrected, but if the street was to remain unchanged, I and my fellow residents strongly believe that nothing noteworthy would be sacrificed or that the city would be in any manner harnessed with unacceptable conditions. On the other hand however, many a resident, who purchased a home here namely because it had -a dead-end, would have to have there neighborhood significantly altered for something that has the general appearance of being rather insignificant! Are not the residents and the neighborhood worthy of a substantial consideration. Unfortunately it seems that this entire situation centers around the input of those who have no personal stake in -the matter, they maintain separate agendas that apparently ignore the simple, but important, human element, that being those of us who resid.e__ here on Madera Lane. I thank you for your time in reading this letter and, any subsequent consideration you might undertake that would take into account the feelings and opinions of those who reside on Madera Lane. Sincerely, 1 Maso ennY7 17422 Made4a)Lane HuntingtonVAach, CA. 92647 cc: Howard Zelefsky ATTAGHMENT NO. �,� 0 Mr. & Mrs Gary Toguchi 17401 Madera Ln. Huntington Bch. Ca. 92647 December 1 , 1995 DEPT. of COMMUrTITY DEVELOPMENT PO J= 190 2000 Maine St. Huntington F3ch. 92648 SUWBCT TENT. TRACT MAP 15071 In support of retaining .Madera Lane as a dead end street (cul-de-sac) . We appreciate the fact that we were notified.of possible changes forthcoming so, we can voice our opinion and preferences, and also from preventing future dis- agreement or litigations. We believe, the closed cul-de-sac has significant impact on crime preventions and burglaries, also the safety of slower traffic and homeowners can be assured the safety of their children. Homeowners have no control over crimes and speeding traffic hazzards. To pre- serve this aesthetic quality of this contented neighborhood, we do not need a through street on Madera Lane. For 27 years we have fortunately not exper- ienced a fire problem,_ due to the fact that it is more controlable by safety precautions of the homeowner. With the higher rates of crime the cul-de-sac can contribute to control and deter crime. . The Fire T ept. and the Planning C nnision should plan a-rid work together to come up with a feasible solution agreeable with the majority of the homeowners. The proposed project (7T-15071 ) and the future owner of the new tract will certainly recognize the closed cul-de-sac as a valuable and worthy feature for bringing up a family as we have. The Fire Dept. and Planning Commision can control the future harmony of both parties so, why destroy a good thing when you can create a safer and better environment for the community. Please re-consider and keep our Madera Lane as a dead end street. Respectfully ubmitted, iJL DEC 0 4 1995 A j T�-� ..�MENT N0. IO,' December 1,1995 Department of Community Development PO Box 190 2000 Main Street DEC 0 51995 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648 Attention: Beth Broeren,Asst. Planner Gentlemen: We have been advised that there is a plan to build approximately 17 single family homes at the north end of. Madera Lane in Huntington Beach, project number tt15071. As a homeowner currently residing on the dead end street of Madera Lane, I would like to voice my concerns about making Madera a through street to accommodate these new homes. We purchased a home on Madera Lane in 1986. During our search for a home in Huntington Beach we specifically looked for a home that was on a quiet street,that eras protected from traffic and noise. We chose our home very carefully and have been completely satisfied with Madera Lane. We feel that making Madera Lane a through street would cause much more traffic in our neighborhood, as well as the new proposed neighborhood. We feel that the new buyers would be looking for safety for their family as well. As you know, a long stretch of street makes for speeding cars through a family area. This would certainly cause a concern for families of small children. As it is now,. we can safely allow our children to play outside with no threat to their safety from speeding cars. In looking at the concerns of the fire department,we feel that the response time for the new neighborhood would be sufficient from an entrance on Edwards. If the street was a through street it would not make any difference in the response time for problems on our end of Madera. We coul&still be serviced from the entrance on Slater. We welcome the additional homes being planned and feel that a.plan could be developed that would serve both- areas very nicely by keeping Madera a closed street while allowing for the building of the north half of the street. A nice common grassy area could be planned for the end of Madera between the two areas that would allow some type of closure without being restrictive to foot traffic. We would ask that some alternative plans be developed that would allow our street to remain without speeding through traffic,and a safe environment for our children The end of the street closure,if parklike,would certainly enhance the area. Thank you for your attention and for your possible review of the plan as it now exists taking in to consideration the concerns of the existing neighbors. You y .C� n tm Huertas 17371 Madera Lane Huntington Beach,Ca 92648 HMENT NO. 10. December 5, 1995 Mary Beth Broeren Assistant City Planner, ,�OW- ow fl ,!r Department of Community Development P.O. Box 190, DEC p 6 1995 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Madera as a Through Street ` Dear Ms. Broeren: I am an original homeowner on Madera and have lived with the street as a dead end for the past 28 years. The street being a dead end street was one reason I chose this particular location. I do not feel it is right to change the street after 28 years. If the intent was to have Madera as a through street, the property owners should have been notified a long time ago. Has an Environmental Impact Report been completed? There are rodents living where the nursery is and when the nursery is destroyed, these rodents will relocate in the adjoining residential . areas. If the street goes through, there will be more traffic on Madera, more noise, potential increase in burglaries, and increase in the speed of vehicles thereby making it less safe for the children. The homeowners of Madera would like the street to remain as it has been for the past 28 years. I believe the property owner has a right to sell the property and the developer the right to. ' build homes on this property. The developer would benefit by one extra lot if Madera remains a-dead end. I would like you to reconsider Madera as a through street and thank you for any effort you may expend on behalf of the homeowners. Sir Gtili 17442 Madera Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92647 cc: Howard Zelefsky ATTACHMENT NO. 4,. Z O Z F- W CU of-tY• ;t •o ~"r•-1 11Auf -+ flrirl7 , = ..a.! Jgr..•.)J 1 _ CloyV/00-7 oj 0 ® � •' •1 tl' �'�O t a: �' �)-.--�.�-�;- U . ... '-'v'"� �. V M O y \/ I' 'r' �� V t!1 I• 0 nJ ! _�j �'Lt _ �i G'•,( l!'1I 0I U''`• 'l) 6 o. � _•.� —•.at..�,_...,.--A_.:..lr. �rw•1�' �- OS 09 09 '� ,r t`' 1; O ., 4 �- .,;.,)--:- ----✓.:a.:-__ -• !T �1 CI El'o. dl,! -71YY1116 to Y. 1 Arrt ♦J•rri;t ,1 t , � ' s �.. �-',t I .. �! N.�.. .i' k 1 01 2�ed . QL o 9.0 • .Q C l '0 t ),]Y:7 t at••u,• a -4 .t .( y O a0 Y 1' V•.fit.=• /n� n'�^ ; U' Ul �` _ 4 1 - � o o r � U Y - 0 ATTACHMENT NO. 12 SUGGESTED CHANGES AND ADDITIONS TO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (ATTACHMENT NO. 1) ASSOCIATED WITH ALTERNATIVE CIRCULATION PLAN TENTATIVE TACT MAP NO. 15071: Add - 1.b. Revise map to reflect a cul-de-sac street design with access from Athena Drive only- and include a 24 foot wide access easement along the westerly edge of Lot 1 to the southern segment of Madera Lane. Add - 2.a. The following shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach: 6. Twenty-four (24) foot emergency only access easement through Lot 1. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-72: Add - I.b. Revise site plan to reflect a cul-de-sac street design with access from Athena Drive only and include a 24 foot wide access easement through Lot 1. Add - 31. A detailed site plan of the emergency accessing shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department and Fire Department. The plan shall- identify removal of a 24 foot wide portion of the existing block wall at the northernmost end of the southern segment of Madera Lane and installation of paver blocks with locked gates in this location. The gate shall be equipped with a knox box. Attachment- 12/12/95 (pcsr171-24) ATTACHMENT NO. j 1� RECOMMENDED LANDSCAPE SCENARIO FOR EDWARDS STREET BLOCK WALL 11.5' 5`. L, LANDSCAPE AREA PUBLIC SIDEWALK . . EDWARDS STREET m O NORTH Board of Trustees: HUN'TINGTONBEACH UNION Bonnie Bruce 1 HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT Baarbaarae JoohnsCason Curt Jones * * Michael Simons _ 10251 Yorktown Avenue •Huntington Beach, California 92646-2999 as `P (714) 964-3339 FAX(714) 963-7694 David J. Hagen, Ed.D.,Superintendent of Schools bpM SCMtX'r'� Mr. Howard Zelefsky November 1, 1995 Department of Community Development 2000:Main Street NOV 031995 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mr. Zelefsky: On.behalf of the Huntincyton Beach Union High School District I have received notice of the meeting of the subdivision subcommittee of the Planning Corru-nission to review Tentative Tract Map 15071 pertaining to a proposed 17 lot subdivision for residential units at 17301 Edwards Street. I have also received and reviewed the-Draft Negative Declaration (No. 95-8) pertaining to this project. District staff have analyzed the existing capacity of our schools and projected enrollment growth for the next few years. We find that internal growth and approved development will absorb our capacity and that enrollment generated by new development will impose a financial burden on the District due to the need for additional classroom-and auxiliary space. Our analysis shows that the cost of adding permanent classroom space for new students is $28,277.80 per student, which consists of $15,676.97 for construction and furnishings and an additional $12,600.83 for the cost of land acquisition. Attached are details for these figures. For this proposed development we project an increase of 3 students, or a potential cost of $84,833.40. We estimate that the homes will generate S30,742.099 in developer fees, leaving a shortfall of $54,091.31. We certainly take issue with the finding in the Negative Declaration that the project would have less than significant impact on the schools, when this project alone falls.short of funding its impact by more than $50,000. Furthermore, the school districts have repeatedly asserted the importance of considering cumulative i-rnpacts of development throughout the City when assessing the effect on schools. While we are sensitive to the burden that the costs of full mitigation place on a development, we are also concerned about the need to ensure that adequate classroom space is provided for the children of those home buyers. Therefore, we request that, prior to approval of the Tentative Tract Map, the City require.the developer to enter negotiations with the District for mitigation of the impact of the proposed development on our schools. I would be pleased to meet with representatives of the developer and City staff to discuss .this matter further. Sincerely, 7 Patricia Reid Koch, Ph. Assistant Superintendent, Business Services Attachment TT4.rHMFNT NO. �4.L The mission of the HBUHSD, responsive to our diverse community expectations, is to educate.all siudents'by ensuring a relevanrand_ focused educational program which develops responsible,productive and creative individuals with a capacity for leadership. *,ITY OF HUNTINGTON BEA 79 MEETING DATE: June 7, 1999 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PW99-041 Council/Agency Meeting Held: De rred/Continued to: pprov d ❑ Conditio Ily Ap ro d ❑ Denied Clerk's Signature Council Meeting Date: June 7, 1999 Department ID Number: PW99-041 x CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION -4�= ; r J :7e SUBMITTED TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Lo SUBMITTED BY: RAY SILVER, City Administrator�,/ PREPARED BY: 'TWBERT F. BEARDSLEY, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: APPROVE THE RELEASE OF SECURITIES FOR TRACT NO. 15071 41 AND ACCEPT THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. Statement of Issue,Funding Source,Recommended Action,Alternative Action(s),Analysis,Environmental Status,Attachment(s) Statement of Issue: Broadmoor Beach LLC, the developer of Tract No. 15071, located on the west side of Edwards Street north of Slater Avenue, has completed all required public improvements and is requesting a release of securities pursuant to the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. Funding Source: Not applicable Recommended Action: Motion to: 1. Accept the improvements constructed and dedicated for public use with Tract No. 15071 and, 2. Release the Faithful Performance/Labor and Material No. CBB1456 and Monument , Bond No. CBB1457 pursuant to California Government Code Section No. 66499.7(b); and, 3. Accept Maintenance Bond No. CBB11880; the security furnished for guarantee and warranty of improvements, and instruct the City Clerk to file the bond with the City Treasurer; and, 4. Instruct the City Clerk to notify the developer, Broadmoor Beach LLC of this action, and the City Treasurer to notify the bonding company, National American Insurance Company, of this action; and, 5. Instruct the City Clerk to record the "Notice of Acceptance of Public Improvements"/ (attached) with the Orange County Recorder. i • Alternative Action(s): Deny the recommended action. Analysis: On July 1, 1996, the City Council approved Final Map No. 15071 and accepted bonds, the securities furnished for faithful performance, labor and material and monuments. The developer has completed all required public improvements, and is requesting acceptance of the work and release of the faithful performance, labor and material and monument bonds, pursuant to Calif. Government Code Section 66499.79(a). Public improvements constructed consist of the domestic water system and appurtenances, sanitary sewer system and appurtenances, storm drain system and appurtenances, curb, gutter, sidewalk, paving and street furniture. The City Engineer has determined that the improvements have been constructed in substantial compliance with the approved plans and specifications, and recommends acceptance of the improvements. Calif. Government Code Section No. 66499.3 (d) requires that security for the guarantee and warranty of the improvements be posted upon acceptance of the public improvements. The developer has provided Maintenance Bond No. CBB11880 as security. Following is a list of project data: Developer: Broadmoor Beach LLC, 5405 Oberlin Dr., San Diego, CA. 92121 Engineer: MDS Consulting Engineers, 17320 Redhill Ave., Ste. 350, Irvine, CA. 92714 Title Co.: First American Title Co., 114 E. 5th St., Santa Ana, Ca. 92702 Zone: R-1 Environmental Status: This recommended action is a ministerial act, and is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Cal. Admin. Code, Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15268 (b). Attachment(s): City Clerk's Page Number No. Description 1. Location Map 2 Maintenance Bond No. CBB11880 3 Acceptance of Public Improvements Form RCA Author: Bruce Crosby Tr 15071 release RCA -- 05/17/99 5:16 PM (13) • 06/07/99 - CouncilQency Agenda - Page 13 E-5. (City Council) Adopt Resolution No. 99-38 Concerning Possible Threat of Groundwater Contamination by Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether(MTBE) (520.20)— Adopt the attached Resolution No. 99-38 concerning the possible threat of groundwater contamination by Methyl Tertiary-Butyl Ether (MTBE) —"A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Conceming Possible Threat of Groundwater Contamination by Methyl Tertiary-Butyl Ether(MTBE)." Submitted by the Director of Public Works [Adopted 6-0-1 (Garofalo out of the room)] E-6. (City Council) Approve Implementation of Coca-Cola Agreement Regarding Vending Machines—Approve Budget Amendment (600.10) —Approve an amendment to the FY 98/99 budget by appropriating $35,000 into Account No. AA-CS-345-3-90-00 (from the $300,000 deposited into the General Fund from the Coca-Cola Agreement) for hiring an electrical contractor to provide the necessary service for 150 vending machine locations per the agreement with Coca-Cola. Submitted by the Community Services Director [Approved 6-0-1 (Garofalo out of the room)] E-7. (City Council) Approve the Release of Securities for Tract No. 15071 and Accept the Public Improvements — Broadmoor Beach, LLC)w/s Edwards Street, n/s Slater Avenue (420.60) — 1. Accept the improvements constructed and dedicated for public use with Tract No. 15071 and 2. Release the Faithful Performance/Labor and Material Bond No. CBB1456 and Monument Bond No. CBB1457 pursuant to California Government Code Section No. 66499.7(b); and 3. Accept Maintenance Bond No. CBB11880; the security furnished for guarantee and warranty of improvements, and instruct the City Clerk to file the bond with the City Treasurer; and 4. Instruct the City Clerk to notify the developer, Broadmoor Beach LLC of this action, and the City Treasurer to notify the bonding company, (National American Insurance Company), of this action; and 5. Instruct the City Clerk to record the Notice of Acceptance of Public Improvements (attached) with the Orange County Recorder. Submitted by the Director of Public Works [Approved 6-0-1 (Garofalo out of the room)] E-8. (City Council) Approve the Release of Securities for Tract No. 14990 and Accept the Public Improvements—(Presley Homes) s/e Corner Cumberland Drive/Victoria Lane (former Gill School Site) (420.60) — 1. Accept the improvements constructed and dedicated for public use with Tract No. 14990, and 2. Release the Faithful Performance/Labor and Material Bond No. 111 3321 6199 and Monument Bond No. 111 3321 6115 pursuant to California Government Code Section No. 66499.7(b); and 3. Accept Maintenance Bond No. 111 3321 6199-M; the security furnished for guarantee and warranty improvements, and instruct the City Clerk to file the bond with the City Treasurer; and 4. Instruct the City Clerk to notify the developer, Presley Homes of this action, and the City Treasurer to notify the bonding company, (The American Insurance Company), of this action; and 5. Instruct the City Clerk to record the Notice of Acceptance of Public Improvements (attached) with the Orange County Recorder. Submitted by the Director of Public Works [Approved 6-0-1 (Garofalo out of the room)] CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CONNIE BROCKWAY CITY CLERK LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL OF.-ITEM APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL/ REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF HUN INGTON BEACH e, "I. DATE: JU n e-TO: BYDQdmoor &aCA. I-L y A�TENTION: Name 5- i TT p h,Q JIA/ Ori ✓PJ DEPARTMENT: Street /� n J)i 2G o , La f. �a/a"Z l REGARDING: City,State,Zip 1 Y�'!P/20✓e�Y1�D� /P����f CSPCuri'�7e`s See Attached Action-Agenda Item Date of Approval—� :.... Enclosed For'Your-Records Is-An-Executed= 'op y Of The.Above.Referenced:Acrenda Item:_ Remarks.. . . ..._. - 2, e- aL5— ��llDS 2t 7FLC� ��®�cs��G ��'•....."--��' eYFi�r�Y12Y)�G .0 lc.uDi'" v i/4,�.2 r� Connie Brockway City Clerk )2121fjMe'nFA'./Z . c8 /J�5 7 Attachments: Action Agenda Page Agreement Bonds Insurance RCA / Deed Other CC: ?d rds I tow NAne Departmetit RCA Agreement Insurance Other/ ns j ✓ Name Department RCA Agreement Insurance Other - r'i,e Ae A rl'e T✓easur42e— 7 s� Name Department RCA Agreement Insurance Other Name Department "`RCA'.--' Agreemen ',' anwr`ance Other 0. Risk Management Dept. :. _ Insurance Received by Name-Company Name- Date G:Followup/coverltr (Telephone:714-536-5227) • (13) 06/07/99 - Council/Agency Agenda - Page 13 E-5. (City Council) Adopt Resolution No. 99-38 Concerning Possible Threat of Groundwater Contamination by Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether(MTBE) (520.20)— Adopt the attached Resolution No. 99-38 concerning the possible threat of groundwater contamination by Methyl Tertiary-Butyl Ether (MTBE) —"A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Concerning Possible Threat of Groundwater Contamination by Methyl Tertiary-Butyl Ether(MTBE)." Submitted by the Director of Public Works [Adopted 6-0-1 (Garofalo.out of the room)] E-6. (City Council) Approve Implementation of Coca-Cola Agreement Regarding Vending Machines —Approve Budget Amendment (600.10) —Approve an amendment to the FY 98/99 budget by appropriating $35,000 into Account No. AA-CS-345-3-90-00 (from the $300,000 deposited into the General Fund from the Coca-Cola Agreement) for hiring an electrical contractor to provide the necessary service for 150 vending machine locations per the agreement with Coca-Cola. Submitted by the Community Services Director [Approved 6-0-1 (Garofalo out of the room)] E-7. (City Council) Approve the Release of Securities for Tract No. 15071 and Accept the Public Improvements— Broadmoor Beach, LLC) w/s Edwards Street, n/s Slater Avenue (420.60) — 1. Accept the improvements constructed and dedicated for public use with Tract No. 15071 and 2. Release the Faithful Performance/Labor and Material Bond No. CBB1456 and Monument Bond No. CBB1457 pursuant to California Government Code Section No. 66499.7(b); and 3. Accept Maintenance Bond No. CBB11880; the security furnished for guarantee and warranty of improvements, and instruct the City Clerk to file the bond with the City Treasurer; and 4. Instruct the City Clerk to notify the developer, Broadmoor Beach LLC of this action, and the City Treasurer to notify the bonding company, (National American Insurance Company), of this action; and 5. Instruct the City Clerk to record the Notice of Acceptance of Public Improvements (attached) with the Orange County Recorder. Submitted by the Director of Public Works [Approved 6-0-1 (Garofalo out of the room)] E-8. (City Council) Approve the Release of Securities for Tract No. 14990 and Accept the Public Improvements— (Presley Homes) s/e Corner Cumberland DriveNictoria Lane (former Gill School Site) (420.60) — 1. Accept the improvements constructed and dedicated for public use with Tract No. 14990, and 2. Release the Faithful Performance/Labor and Material Bond No. 111 3321 6199 and Monument Bond No. 111 3321 6115 pursuant to California Government Code Section No. 66499.7(b); and 3. Accept Maintenance Bond No. 111 3321 6199-M; the security furnished for guarantee and warranty improvements, and instruct the City Clerk to file the bond with the City Treasurer; and 4. Instruct the City Clerk to notify the developer, Presley Homes of this action, and the City Treasurer to notify the bonding company, (The American Insurance Company), of this action; and 5. Instruct the City Clerk to record the Notice of Acceptance of Public Improvements (attached) with the Orange County Recorder. Submitted by the Director of Public Works [Approved 6-0-1 (Garofalo out of the room)] I ..'�'St :�irr'� •�f•.{.. ,F.t",, ,�-r..rr-,•r�t�r.� �f ^t;4l.�d'•...,—r 'I�r,...r.. .-,. •--•.-.�_ _.�.__ - -- --�. _..t...._.._-.—......._.._,_ ..._....,.__o. - . mOffice of the City Clerk ��T�,ti f U.S.:x)';:aGE'. CITY of HUNTINGTON BEACH n / AUG 12'3 '3 P.O. Box 190 California 92648 C A H METEN'•S!.S:ti', • BROADMOOR HOMES SOUTH WEST INC fj 1 5405 OBERLIN DRIVE SUITE 200 P �f: SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA 92121ELIVIH A6 LE -i I' 0 D R}E s s Eih1►�s�I'�i�ll���l �ll:��l����lll I ; "f 1ilnIludt.lilt nu�llr�u�lu��rl�r�lr�i n i lb M CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CONNIE BROCKWAY CITY CLERK LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL OF ITEM APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL/ REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF HUNTr GTON BEACH DATE: JU Yl e- I l TO: BroactmOo,r &ae- . 1-1-& ATTENTION: Name 6,b IA/ Zr? ✓eJ DEPARTMENT: Street ,\ //�I G' /9CCCP77��C (�ql/F /oZ/oZ REGARDING:7IMdr 156 V City,State,Zip i YY)PRD✓e�Y1A� /tee&"1JF' C�PCr�1--i ie�S See Attached Action Agenda Item - / Date of Approval Enclosed For Your Records Is An Executed Copy Of The Above Referenced Agenda Item. Remarks• �. Connie Brockway Jr City Clerk >ne)4fjMe1)rNlb C� i�45r Attachments: Action Agenda Page Agreement Bonds__ Insurance RCA i Deed Other CC: B4?Ardslf. j Pu)D ✓ &as N.Zme De meet RCA Agreement Insurance Other ' f D Uj Nux De artment RCA Agreement Insurance Other I-ri e A ric Name Department RCA Agreement Insurance Other Name Department RCA Agreement Insurance Other Risk Management Dept. Insurance Received by Name-Company Name - Date G:Followup/coverltr (Telephone:714-536-5227) ATTACHMENT 1 -CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of San Diego On 9/1/98 before me, Melanie Anderson, Notary Public , Date Name and Title of Officer(e.g.,"Jane Doe,Notary Public") personally appeared Jerome L. Hren Name(s)of Signer(s) N personally known to me—OR—❑proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies),and that by MELANIE AIDERSON his/her/their signature(s)on the instrument the person(s), COMM.#1070617 0 or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, NOTARY PUBLIC-CALIFORNIA r<f;, executed the instrument. to Y� OtEGOoOENMyCortinYTM$ AJGUS!27,to WITNESS my hand and official seal. 21 Signature—of Notary Public OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Maintenance Bond No. CBB11880 Document Date: 9/1/98 Number of Pages: L Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: Jerome L. Hren Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer ❑ Corporate Officer Title(s): Title(s): ❑ Partner—❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Partner—❑ Limited ❑ General N Attorney-in-Fact ❑ Attorney-in-Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Trustee u it ElGuardian or Conservator - ElGuardian or Conservator - irej ❑ Other: Top of thumb here ❑ Other: Top of thumb here t I Signer Is Representing: Signer Is Representing: National American Insurance Company 0 1994 National Notary Association•8236 Remmet Ave.,P.O.Box 7184•Canoga Park,CA 91309-7184 Prod.No.5907 Reorder:Call Toil-Free 1.800.876.6827 i • ATTACHMENT 3 Recorded in the County of Orange, California Recording requested by, Gary L. Granville, Clerk/Recorder and when recorded return to: IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIII IIIII I IIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIII IIIIIIII No Fee Connie Brockway,City Clerk 19990585122 09;27am 08/11/99 Office of the City Clerk 005 15017263 15 48 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH A04 1 6.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P.O.Box 190—2000 Main Street Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 (Space above this line for Recorder's use only) ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS (Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Section 255.22) _ PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT on May 3, 1999, the City Engineer considered the 01 subdivision improvements described below, and found them to have been completed satisfactory 11� and accepted, as limited by Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Section a 255.22(A), the improvements for public use. Further, the public improvements for the subdivision(s)have been dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach, as described on Final Map No. 15071. Public improvements constructed consist of the domestic water system and appurtenances, sanitary sewer system and appurtenances, storm drain system and appurtenances, curb, gutter, sidewalk,paving and street furniture. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH This documeTd is solely for the by: City Engineer armcial busarness of the City C of Huntington Beach, as contsm- plated under Guvemment Code APPROVED AS TO FORM: sec. 6103 ant'-should be recorcle1he foregoing instrument is a correct free of charg®o copy of the original on file in this office. 19_I,f City Attorn Attest 34715 ROC KwAY &//31, f Tax-Exempt-Govermnent Agency CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH :`: Clerk and Ex officio Clerk of the City � 1 Connie'13fookwaY,C11Y Clerk Council of the City of Huntington Beach, Califo a. � Pay ity Clerk By puri • • CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CONNIE BROCKWAY CITY CLERK June 18, 1999 Gary L. Granville, County Clerk-Recorder P. 0. Box 238 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Enclosed please find "Acceptance of Public Improvements" for Tract 13569 to be recorded and returned to the City of Huntington Beach, Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648. Please return a conformed copy of the acceptance when.recorded and return to this office in the enclosed self-addressed stamped envelope. G� &4_4� Connie Brockway, CIVIC City Clerk Enclosures g:\followup\deedltr: Tract 15071 — Broadmoor Beach LLC— Edwards/Slater (Telephone:714536-5227) Recording requested by, and when recorded return to: Connie Brockway,City Clerk Office of the City Clerk CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH P.O.Box 190—2000 Main Street Huntington Beach,Ca.92648 (Space above this line for Recorder's use only) ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS (Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Section 255.22) PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT on May 3, 1999, the City Engineer considered the subdivision improvements described below, and found them to have been completed satisfactory and accepted, as limited by Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Section 255.22(A), the improvements for public use. Further, the public improvements for the subdivision(s)have been dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach, as described on Final Map No. 15071. Public improvements constructed consist of the domestic water system and appurtenances, sanitary sewer system and appurtenances, storm drain system and appurtenances, curb, gutter, sidewalk,paving and street furniture. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH This document Is solely for the by: City Engineer Of -lta t9_ APPROVED AS TO FORM: :inmaen2 Code Sao. 61 Ley and s+riould be recorded free of char9eo City Attorn y 34715 31ff 511 Oh Tax Exampt-Government Ag®ncY CITY OF HUNTINGTO 'BEACH co nie Brockway,CI9Y Clerk By.7pLi� City Clerk • RCA &OUTING SHEET INITIATING DEPARTMENT: Public Works SUBJECT: Approve the Release of Securities for Tract No. 15071 and Accept the Public Improvements COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 7, 1999 .... ...... ATUSRCA ATTACHMENTS ST Ordinance (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Not Applicable Resolution (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Not Applicable Tract Map, Location Map and/or other Exhibits Attached Contract/Agreement (w/exhibits if applicable) (Signed in full by the City Attorney) Not Applicable Subleases, Third Party Agreements, etc. (Approved as to form by City Attorney) Not Applicable Certificates of Insurance (Approved by the City Attorney) Not Applicable Financial Impact Statement (Unbudget, over $5,000) Not Applicable Bonds (If applicable) Attached Staff Report (If applicable) Not Applicable Commission, Board or Committee Report (If applicable) Not Applicable Findings/Conditions for Approval and/or Denial Not Applicable :EXPLANATION FOgR MISSING ATTACHMENTS REVIEWED RETURNED : F,O RDED Administrative Staff ( ) ( ) Assistant City Administrator (Initial) ( ) ( ) City Administrator (Initial) City Clerk ( ) EXPrLANATION FOR--RETURN OF ITEM (Below • . • Only) RCA Author: Bruce Crosby Council/Agency Meeting Held: Deferred/Continued to: $Approved ❑ Conditionally Approved ❑ Denied City Clerk'sS4i-faturg _Council Meeting Date: July 1, 1996 Department ID Number: CD 6i-33, ry CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ,m REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION n;rn SUBMITTED TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS , SUBMITTED BY: MICHAEL T. UBERUAGA, City Adi o / PREPARED BY: MELANIE S. FALLON, Community Development Director SUBJECT: FINAL TRACT MAP NO. 15071 OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15071, WITH BONDS AND AGREEMENTS (MUKAI SUBDIVISION) Statement of Issue,Funding Source,Recommended Action,Alternative Action(s),Analysis,Environmental Status,Attachment( Statement of Issue: Final Tract Map No. 15071 (Mukai Subdivision, a 17 unit single family residential subdivision), located on the west side of Edwards Street, north of Slater Avenue, is being submitted to the City Council for approval. Funding Source: Not applicable. Recommended Action: Motion to: "Approve Final Tract Map No. 15071 and accept the offer of dedication and improvements and bonds pursuant to the following findings and requirements:" Findings for Acceptance of Final Map: 1. Final Tract Map No. 15071 is in conformance with the California Subdivision Map Act, the City of Huntington Beach Subdivision Ordinance and Tentative Tract Map No. 15071 conditions of approval as approved by the Planning Commission. 1 1 0r RQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTS MEETING DATE: July 1, 1996 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD 96-33 Requirements: 1. Offer of dedication and improvements are subject to completion of requirements shown on the tentative map. 2. The City Clerk is hereby instructed to file the following bonds with the City Treasurer: a. Faithful Performance Bond and Labor and Material Bond No. CBB1456 b. Monument Bond No. CBB1457 3. Instruct the City Clerk to not affix her signature to the map nor release it for preliminary processing by the County of Orange for recordation until the following conditions have been complied with for the map: a. A deposit of fees for water, sewer, drainage, engineering, and inspections shall be provided; b. A Certificate of Insurance shall be submitted; C. Drainage for the subdivision shall be approved by the Department of Public Works prior to recordation of the final map. d. Subdivision Agreement Alternative Action(s): The City Council may make the following motion: A. "Deny Final Tract Map No. 15071 and not accept the offer of dedication, improvements, and bonds." CD96-33.DOC -2- 06/18/96 9:53 AM r QUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTS MEETING DATE: July 1, 1996 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD 96-33 Analysis: A. PROJECT PROPOSAL: SUBDIVIDER: Broadmoor Homes Southwest, Inc. 5402 Oberlin Dr., Ste. 200 San Diego, CA 92121 ENGINEER: MDS Consulting 17320 Redhill Avenue, Ste. 350 Irvine, CA 92714 LOCATION: West of Edwards Street, North of Slater Avenue ZONE: RL-FP2 (Residential-Low Density-7 Units per Acre-Floodplain) GENERAL PLAN: Low Density Residential NO. OF ACRES: 3.848 NO. OF LOTS: 17 NO. OF UNITS: 17 DISCUSSION: On December 12, 1995, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map No. 15071 for a 17 lot subdivision for construction of 17 detached single family residential units. Final Tract Map No. 15071 represents the only phase of the project. The subdivider has satisfied the Park and Recreation requirement through the payment of park and recreation fees in the amount of$53,040.00. The subdivider has also complied with a conditon of approval requiring submittal of an affordable housing plan prior to recordation of the map. This plan consists of two affordable units to be provided off-site. The final map has been examined and certified by the City Engineer and the Secretary to the Planning Commission as being in conformance with the conditions of approval for the tentative map as filed with, amended and approved by the Planning Commission. CD96-33.DOC -3- 06/18/96 9:53 AM i 01 0 VEST FOR COUNCIL ACTIA MEETING DATE: July 1, 1996 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD 96-33 Environmental Status: This action to accept Final Tract Map No. 15071 is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, Section 15628(b). On December 12, 1995, the Planning Commission approved Negative Declaration No. 95-8 for the 17 unit subdivision. Attachment(s): ........City Clerk's Page Number ..... . ........... ... ............. ..................... ........ ................. ..................... ....... ..................... .................... ....... .......... . _ .......... 1. Area Map 2. Tentative Tract Map No. 15071 3. Tentative Tract Map No. 15071 Findings and Conditions of Approval 4. Subdivision Agreement 5. Monument Bond — ON 6. Faithful Performance Bond and Labor and Material Bond — Or, ....... In C/mks 0�w CD96-33.DOC -4- 06/18/96 9:53 AM CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CONNIE BROCKWAY CITY CLERK August 7, 1996 Broadmoor Homes Southwest, Inc. 5402 Oberlin Drive, Ste. 200 San Diego, CA 92121 Gentlemen: The City Council of Huntington Beach, at its regular meeting held Monday, July 1, 1996, approved the Subdivision Agreements for Final Tract Map No. 15071. We are enclosing herewith copies of the agreement, insurance, and bonds for your files. Sii5erely, Connie Brockway, CIVIC City Clerk CB/cc Enclosure g:Vollowu p\sdivag rmt (Telephone: 714-536-5227) SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND BROADMOOR BEACH, L.L.C. FOR TRACT NO. 15071 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1 General Street Construction..................................................................................2 2 Arterial Highway Improvement...............................................................................2 3 Guarantee.............................................................................................................2 4 Faithful Performance and Security.........................................................................3 5 Indemnification, Defense, Hold Harmless..............................................................3 6 Workers' Compensation Insurance........................................................................4 7 Insurance...............................................................................................................4 8 Certificates of Insurance; Additional Insured Endorsements.................................5 9 Attorneys' Fees......................................................................................................5 3/k/tr15071/6/5/96 J J AUTHORIZATION OF MAP RELEASE TO TITLE CO. TO: Christine Cleary Deputy City Clerk FROM: Bruce Crosby Civil Engineer Assistant DATE: July 8, 1996 TRACT NO.: 15071 TITLE CO.: First American Title Insurance Co., 114 E. 5th St., Santa Ana, Ca. 92702 PHONE NO.: (714) 558-3211 TITLE OFFICER: Ronald J. Gomez I hereby certify that all Public Works fees, bonds, agreements and insurance requirements have been complied with. /�" Bruce P. Cro y 8078.05 NOTICE OOZOMPLIANCE WITHOONDITIONS ON TRACT/PARCEL MAP AND AUTHORIZATION FOR RELEASE FOR RECORDING TO: CITY CLERK DATE: 3.9(0 FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Howard Zelefsky TRACT NO. PARCEL MAP NO. PARK AND RECREATION FEES PAID: YES $ ❑ NO OTHER: or: (3HOwarcYZelefsky Planning Director SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND BROADMOOR BEACH, L.L.C. FOR TRACT NO. 15071 THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this 19th day of July , 1996, by and between the CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY," and BROADMOOR BEACH, L.L.C., hereinafter referred to as "SUBDIVIDER." RECITALS WHEREAS, SUBDIVIDER-is the owner of a tract of land in CITY, which it is seeking to subdivide into lots and to dedicate certain streets, alleys, and other improvements therein to public use, and is about to file with CITY a map of the tract of land known as Tract No. 15071; and As a condition of the approval of and prior to the recordation of said subdivision map, . SUBDIVIDER is required to improve and dedicate the streets and alleys, and to perform certain other improvements in said subdivision; and SUBDIVIDER desires to enter into an agreement with CITY to delay performance of certain of the work; to agree to perform said work as herein provided; and to execute and deliver to CITY bonds for the faithful performance of said agreement, for the payment of all labor and material in connection therewith, and for the guarantee and warranty of the work for a period of two (2) years following completion and acceptance thereof against any defect in work or labor done, or defective materials furnished, as required by Sections 66499 and 66499.3 of the Govemmenf Code of the State of California, and Chapter 225 of CITY'S Zoning and Subdivision Code. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and agreements of the parties as herein set forth, the parties agree as follows: 1 3/k4r15071/6/5/96 1. GENERAL STREET CONSTRUCTION SUBDIVIDER does hereby agree to do and perform the following work in said tract: - all conditions of the tract map not completed at the time of the recordation thereof to include; but not limited to, the construction of streets, including excavation, paving, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, trees and landscaping; sewers, including construction of main lines and lot laterals and structures; street lights; street signs; construction of domestic water systems including the construction of water mains, lot laterals and installation of meters; engineering costs; and any miscellaneous requirements as may be set forth in CITY'S codes. All of said work shall be done and performed in accordance with plans, specifications and profiles which have been approved by the City Engineer and filed in the office of the City Engineer. All of work shall be done at the sole cost and expense of SUBDIVIDER. The acceptance of the dedication of said streets, alleys and other improvements, and said work shall be completed on or before two (2) years from the date hereof, and all labor and material bills therefor shall have been paid by SUBDIVIDER. 2. ARTERIAL HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT SUBDIVIDER agrees to complete all arterial highway improvements, including perimeter walls and landscaping required by conditions of the tract map, prior to release or connection of utilities for occupancy for any lot in the Tract. 3. GUARANTEE SUBDIVIDER shall guarantee all work and material required to fulfill its obligation as stated herein for a period of one (1) year following the date of City Council acceptance of same. 4. FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE AND SECURITY In accordance with Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Code, upon execution hereof SUBDIVIDER shall deposit with the City Treasurer the sum of Two Hundred Sixty Two Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($262,500) as prescribed by Section 255.16 thereof, which security is given to CITY to insure faithful performance of this Agreement and of 2 3/k/tr15071/5/29/96 • • all of the conditions of the Tract Map. The deposit may be by corporate surety bond, cash or other approved form of improvement security. All bonds and other forms of deposit shall be approved by the City Attorney prior to their acceptance by CITY. SUBDIVIDER may, during the term of this Agreement, substitute improvement security provided that the substituted security is acceptable to the City Attorney; however, any bond or other security given in satisfaction of this condition shall remain in full force and effect until the work of improvement is finally accepted by CITY and SUBDIVIDER may be required by CITY to provide a substitute security at any time. 5. INDEMNIFICATION, DEFENSE, HOLD HARMLESS SUBDIVIDER hereby agrees to protect, defend, indemnify and hold and save harmless CITY, its officers, and employees against any and all liability, claims, judgments, costs and demands, however caused, including those resulting from death or injury to SUBDIVIDER'S employees and damage to SUBDIVIDER'S property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations or operations herein undertaken by SUBDIVIDER, including those arising from the passive concurrent negligence of CITY, but save and except those which,arise out of the active concurrent negligence, sole negligence, or the sole willful misconduct of CITY. SUBDIVIDER will conduct all defense at its sole cost and expense. CITY shall be reimbursed by SUBDIVIDER for all costs or attorney's fees incurred by CITY in enforcing this obligation. 6. WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE Pursuant to Califomia Labor Code § 1861, SUBDIVIDER acknowledges awareness of§ 3700 et seq. of said code, which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation; SUBDIVIDER convenants that it will comply with such provisions prior to commencing performance of the work hereunder. SUBDIVIDER shall maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance in an amount of not less than One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) bodily injury by accident, each occurrence, One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) bodily injury by disease, each 3 3/k/tr15071/5/29/96 employee, Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000) bodily injury by disease,,policy limit. 7. INSURANCE SUBDIVIDER shall carry at all times incident hereto, on all operations to be performed hereunder, general liability insurance, including coverage for bodily injury, property damage, products/completed operations, and blanket contractual liability. Said insurance shall also include automotive bodily injury and property damage liability insurance. All insurance shall be underwritten by insurance companies in forms satisfactory to CITY for all operations, subcontract-work, contractual obligations, product or completed operations and all owned vehicles and non-owned vehicles. Said insurance policies shall name the County of Orange, the CITY and its officers, agents and employees, and all public agencies as determined by the CITY as Additional Insureds. SUBDIVIDER shall subscribe for and maintain said insurance in full force and effect during the life of this Agreement, in an amount of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit coverage. If coverage is provided under a form which includes a designated aggregate limit, such limit shall be no less than One Million Dollars($1,000,000). In the event of aggregate coverage, SUBDIVIDER shall immediately notify CITY of any known depletion of aggregate limits. SUBDIVIDER shall require its insurer to waive its subrogation rights against CITY and agrees to provide certificates evidencing the same. 8. CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE; ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENTS Prior to commencing performance of the work hereunder, SUBDIVIDER shall furnish to CITY certificates of insurance subject to approval of the City Attorney evidencing the foregoing insurance coverages as required by Sections 6 and 7 herein; said certificates shall provide the name and policy number of each carrier and policy, and shall state that the policy is currently in force and shall promise to provide that such policies will not be canceled or modified without thirty (30) days prior written notice to CITY. SUBDIVIDER shall maintain the foregoing 4 3/kRr15071/5/29/96 • insurance coverages in force until the work under this Agreement is fully completed and accepted by CITY. The requirement for carrying the foregoing insurance coverages shall not derogate from the provisions for indemnification of CITY by SUBDIVIDER under Section 5 of this Agreement. CITY or its representative shall at all times have the right to demand the original or a copy of all said policies of insurance. SUBDIVIDER shall pay, in a prompt and timely manner, the premiums on all insurance hereinabove required. A separate copy of the additional insured endorsement to each of SUBDIVIDER'S insurance policies, naming the CITY, its officers and employees as Additional Insureds shall be provided to the City Attorney for approval prior to any payment hereunder. 9. ATTORNEY'S FEES In the event suit is brought by either party to enforce the terms and provisions of this agreement or in any bond given to secure the performance hereof, each party shall bear its own attorney fees and costs. REST OF PAGE NOT USED I 5 3/kftr15071/5/29/96 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement the day and year first above written. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, A municipal corporation of the State of .`BROADMOOR BEACH, LLC, a California California limited liability company, By: BROADMOOR HOMES Southwest, ��-- Inc., a Califor is orporation, Mayor Managing M m ATTEST: By. 6-r -'iG G�s��ccG George J. h las, President City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Michael Chau, Secretary OA i6 ty a ttorneyy REVIEWED APB ROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED: / City Admin trato City Engineer 6 3/ 0 5071/5/2g/96 I have received the Faithful Performance, Labor and Material Bond, and Monument Bonds for Final Tract Map No. 15071, Subdivision Agreement, Broadmoor Homes Southwest, Inc. (Mukai Subdivision) w/Edwards, n/Slater on behalf of the Treasurer's Office. Dated: y By: - Broadmoor Homes Southwest, Inc. 5402 Oberlin Drive, Ste. 200 San Diego, CA 92121 • BOND NO. CBB1456 • PREMIUM $5,750.00 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach,State of California,and Broadmoor Beach LLC, a California Limited Liability Company (hereinafter designated as"principal')have entered into an agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete designated public improvements,which said agreement,dated 19 ,and identified as project Tract 15071 ,is hereby referred to and made a part hereof;and WHEREAS,said principal is required under the terms of said agreement to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said agreement. Now,therefor,we,the principal and National American Insurance Company as surety,are held and firmly bound unto the City of Huntington Beach,hereinafter called"City",the penal Sum of Two Hundred Sixty Two Thousand Five Hundred _dollars($262,500.00 ) lawful money of the United States,for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made,we bind ourselves,our heirs,successors,executors and administrators,jointly and severally,firmly by these presents. The condition of this obligation is such that if the above bounded principal,his or its heirs, executors,administrators,successors or assigns,shall in all things stand to and abide by,and well and truly keep and perform the covenant,condition and provisions in the said agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein provided,on his or their part,to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified,and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning,and shall indemnify and save harmless"City",its officers,agents and employees,as therein stipulated,then this obligation shall become null and void;otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefor,there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees,including reasonable attorney's fees incurred by"City in successfully enforcing such obligation,all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered. 1 The surely hereby stipulates and agrees that no charge,extension of time,alteration or addition to the terns of the agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the same shall in anywise affect its obligations on this bond,and it does hereby waive notice of any change,extension of time,alteration or addition to the terms of the agreerent or to file work or to the specifications. In witness whereof,this instrument has been duly executed by the principal and surely above named,on May 30th 19 96 Broadmoor Beach LLC, a California Limited Liability Company By: Broadmoor homes, Soutliwest, Inc., a California Corporatio , as Manager as Principal r By George; i as, President By M'fchael Chau, Blecrqtary National American Insurance Co. ,as Surety By— IIIAOvi—i Jerome L. Hren, Attorney—in—Fact By 2 • • BOND N0. csB1456 PREMIUM Included in Performance Bond LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach,State of California,and Broadmoor Beach LLC, a California Limited Liability Company (hereinafter designated as"Principal")have entered into an agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete designated public improvements,which said agreement,dated 19 ,and identified as project Tract 15071 ,is hereby referred to and made a part hereof;and WHEREAS,under the terms of said agreement,principal is required before entering upon the performance of the work,to file a good and sufficient payment bond with the City of Huntington Beach to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 15(commencing with Section 3082)of Part 4 of Division 3 of Civil Code of the State of California. Now,therefore,said principal and the undersigned as corporate surety,are held firmly bound unto the City of Huntington Beach and all contractors,subcontractors,laborers,materialmen and other persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid agreement and referred to in the aforesaid Code of Civil Procedures in the sum of one Hundred Thirty One Thousand Two Hundred Fifty dollars($ 131,250.00 ),for materials furnished or labor thereon of any kind,or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor,that said surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the amount hereinabove set forth,and also in case suit is brought upon this bond,will pay,in addition to the face amount thereof,costs and reasonable expenses and fees,including reasonable attorney's fees,incurred by"City"in successfully enforcing such obligation,to be awarded and fixed by the court,and to be taxed as costs and to be included in the judgment therein rendered. It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond shall insure to the benefit of any and all persons,companies and corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15(commencing with Section 3082)of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code,so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. Should the condition of this bond be fully performed,then this obligation shall become null and void,otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change,extension of time,alteration or addition to the terms of said agreement or the specifications accompanying the same shall in any manner 1 8090 affeclaligalion on this bond,and it does hereby waive noti*ny such change,extension,alteration or addition. In witness whereof,this instrument has been fully executed by the principal and surety above named,on ny Nth ,19 96 roa moor Beach LLC, a California Limited Liability Company By: Broadmoor Homes Southwest, Inc., a Califor is Corporation. as a e as�nncipal By: George J. s President By: Mi ael Chau, Se etary National American Ins rance Company as Surety Jerome L. .Hren, Attorney-in-Fact By: STATE OF CALIFORNIA i r � G W JENSEN� h �, ; �i r.;;•� ) SS .`� _'i.-7,i.i,1� NOTARY PULIC-CAUIORNIA ^ a�T,. r SA., MEL- COUNTY COUNTY OF ORANGr ) My Go-m.Gpi,.,Mil.16,1999 ON j l;�'�,., ,� ;-i,I BEFORE ME, A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE,PERSONA LY APPEARED AND PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME(OR PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE) TO BE THE PERSONS WHOSE NAMES ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGES TO ME THAT THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITIES, AND THAT BY THEIR SIGNATURES ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSONS,OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSONS ACTED,EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. .- WITNESS MY HAND-) ! SIGNATURE ; ' .// MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IS NOTARY PUBLIC IN-AII'VF00 SAID STATE IN %'! COUNTY (NAME PRINTED) MY COMMISSION EXPIRES STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) SS COUNTY OF ORANGE ON BEFORE ME, A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE,PERSONALLY APPEARED AND PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME(OR PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE) TO BE THE PERSONS WHOSE NAMES ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGES TO ME THAT THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITIES, AND THAT BY THEIR SIGNATURES ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSONS,OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSONS ACTED,EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. WITNESS MY HAND SIGNATURE MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IS NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE IN COUNTY (NAME PRINTED) MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 8090 2 eu90 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ANOWLEDGMENT • State of California County of San Diego On 5/30/96 before me, Melanie Anderson, Notary Public DATE NAME.TITLE OF OFFICER E.G..'JANE DOE.NOTARY PUBLIC- personally appeared Jerome L. Hren , NAMEIS)OF SIGNEn(S) 0 personally known to me - OR - ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), MELANIE ANDERSON K or the entity upon behalf of which the COMM.#1070617 n m "0'g PUBLIGCALIFORNUI N per acted, executed the instrument. SAN DIEGA COUNTY n My Commission Expires AUGUST 27,1999 WITNESS my hand and official seal. SIGNATURE OF NOTARY OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT ❑ INDIVIDUAL ❑ CORPORATE OFFICER Performance & Payment Bond No. CBB1456 TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT TITLEIS) ❑ PARTNER(S) ❑ LIMITED ❑ GENERAL 4 ATTORNEY-IN-FACT NUMBER OF PAGES ❑ TRUSTEE(S) ❑ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR ❑ OTHER: 5/30/96 DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSONISI OR ENTITY(IES) National American Insurance Company SIGNER(s)OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) SS COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ON BEFORE ME, A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE,PERSONALLY APPEARED AND PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME(OR PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE) TO BE THE PERSONS WHOSE NAMES ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGES TO ME THAT THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITIES, AND THAT BY THEIR SIGNATURES ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSONS,OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSONS ACTED,EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. WITNESS MY HAND SIGNATURE MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IS NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE IN COUNTY (NAME PRINTED) MY COMMISSION EXPIRES STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ON BEFORE ME, A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE,PERSONALLY APPEARED AND PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME(OR PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE) TO BE THE PERSONS WHOSE NAMES ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGES TO ME THAT THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITIES, AND THAT BY THEIR SIGNATURES ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSONS,OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSONS ACTED,EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. WITNESS MY HAND �ih-� fj:---•r+ ::. a,, �. -ice e - •- - 4- y -� i -. S, 3 SIGNATURE ,t<• • . , ; �"' K�� ,T MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF 6USINESS ISM 5 ` NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE. IN COUNTY (NAME PRINTED) MY COMMISSION EXPIRES " 8075 3 NATIONAL AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY Bond OMAHA, NEBRASKA Number CBB 1456 PRINCIPAL: NAME,ADDRESS POWER OF ATTORNEY CITY,STATE,ZIP ORIGINALS OF THIS PONVF,R OF ATTORNEY ARE, PRINTED ON BLUE Broadmoor Beach LLC,a California Limited Liability Co. SAFETY PAPER. DUPLICATES SHALL HAVE THE, SAME FORCE AND ` EFFECTASAN ORIGINALONI.YIVHEN ISSUED IN CONJUNCTION WITH 5405 Oberline Drive,Ste. 200,San Diego,CA 92121 THE ORIGINAL. KNOW ALL MEN BY TIIESF PRESENTS:That the National American Insurance Company,a c(gxinuion duly organized under the laws of the State of Nchma ka.having its principal office in the city ol'Chandler.Oklahoma.pursuant to the following resolution,adopted EFFECTIVE DATE by the Board of Directors of the said Company on the ihh day of July. 1997.to%%it: "Resohed.that anc officer of the Company shall have authority in make.execute and deliver a Power of Attorney constituting as Attorney-in-fact, such persons, firms, or 05/30/96 corporations as may be selected from lime to time. CONTRACT AMOUNT Resoh'ed that nothing in this Power ofAnorney shall he construed as a grant of authority Ili the anorncy(s)-in-fact to sign.execute,acknowledge,deliver orotherwise issue a policy or $ 262,500.00 policies of insurance on behalf of National American Insurance Company. Be It Further Resolx ed,that the signature of any officer and the Seal of the Company BOND AMOUNT may be affixed loan)-such Poivcr ofAnorney,or any certificate relating dierclo by facsimile. and any such Power of Attorney or certificate bearing such facsimile signature or facsimile $ 262,500.00 Performance S131,250.00 Payment seal shall he valid and binding upon the Company and any such powers so executed and certified by facsimile signature and facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company in the future with respect to any bond and documents relating to such bonds I(,which it is utinched."National American Insurance Company does hereby make,constitute and appoint Jerome L. Hren its true and lawful attorney(s)-in-fact.with full power and authority hereby conferred in its name,places and stead,to sign,execute,acknowledge and deliver in its behalf,and its act and deed,as follows: The obligation of the Company shall not exceed one million(51.000.000.00)dollars. And to hind National American Insurance Company therchy as fully and to the same extent as if such bonds and documents relating to such bonds were,signed by the duly authorized officer of the National American Insurance Company.and all the acts of said Attorney(s)pursuant Ili the authority herein given,are hereby ratified and confirmed. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the National American Insurance Company has caused these presents to be signed by any officer or the Company and its Corporate Seal to be hereto affixed. G��tNS�q NATIONAL AMERICAN INSURANCE COAIP:1Nl' m = SEAL I p r s 'may W.Brent LaGere,Chairman&Chief Executive Officer OY,M� 'rf t)rl SF' STATE OFOKLAHOMA ) COUNTY OF LINCOLN ) SS: On this Rth dat ol'Julc.A.D.1997.before me personally came W.Brent LaGere,to me known,who being by me duly sirorn,did depose mid say:that be resides in the Counts of Lincoln.Slate of Oklahoma:that he is the Chairman and Chief Esecu(ice Officer or the National American Insurance Company,the corporation described in and ichich executed the above instrument:(hat he knows the seal of said corporation:that the seal affixed to the said instrument is such corporate seal:that it was so affixed he order of the Board or Directors of said corporation and Ihal he signed his name,thereto by like order. �HpA vI(( TAy��rq , LIC 'l to, o ro. r,or(."C�*�� ~eOrM '04 _ Notary Public STATE OF OKL IlO\Ll I My Commission Expires August 30.1999 COUNTI'OF LINCOLN ) SS: 1,(he undersigned,Assistant Secretary of the Na(ional American Insurance Company,A Nebraska Corporation,DO HEREBY CERTIFY that file foregoing and attached PONVER OF ATTORNEI'remains in full f oce. Signed and Scaled at(fie City of Chandl(-r. '4Q's4'M o S'q+yam _ ' Dated the 30th davNf av 17)6 6 / o SEAL �EAL s r` _ 4 t Winifred E.Mendenhall,Assistant Secretary OY.M� �tlI1.1�► • , • BOND NO. CBB1457 PREMIUM $90.00 MONUMENT BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT Broadmoor Beach LLC, a California Limited Liability Company as Subdivider of Tract No. 15071 in the City of Huntington Beach,County of Orange,State of California,has submitted to said City a Final Map of said tract containing an engineer's or surveyor's certificate stating that all final monuments will be set in the positions indicated on or before the date specified in said certificate: Thatsaid Broadmoor Beach LLC, a California Limited Liability Company (Subdivider) as principal,and National American Insurance Company as surety,hereby guarantee to the City of Huntington Beach the payment of the cost of setting all such monuments within or in connection with said tract,as are not already set prior to the recording of said Final Map,in accordance with said map and said certificate up to but not in excess of the sum of Three Thousand Six Hundred Dollars $ 3,600.00 ,in which sum we are held and firmly bound to the City of Huntington Beach,all in accordance with and subject to the terms,conditions and provisions of Article 9,Chapter 4 of the Government Code of the State of California. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,we have executed this instrument this 30th day of May , 19 96 Broadmoor Beach LLC, a California Limited Liability Company By: Broadmoor Homes Southwest, Inc., a California Corporftion,Ces Manager as Principal By: George las, President By: M chael Chau, a etary Nationekl American Insur nce Company as Surety By: .�. �.. . ^._ Jerome L. Hren, Attorney-in-Fact By: I t g092 STATE 0FCALIFORNIA ) ) SS My Cornm.Expircs JAI. COUNTY OF.GRANGE ) BEFORE ME, ON A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE,PERSONALLY APPEARED AND ' PERSONALLY KNOWN TOME(OR PROVED TOMEON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE) TOBE THE PERSONS WHOSE NAMES ARE SUBSCRIBED T0 THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGES TO ME THAT THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITIES, AND THAT BY THEIR SIGNATURES ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSONS,OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSONS ACTED,EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. WITNESS MY HAND SIGNATURE MY PRINCIPAL LAC S | NOTARY PUBLIC /u mv uum/, | ' ' ' '(VAMEPRINTED) MY COMMISSION EXPIRES. STATE OFCALIFORNIA ) ) 33 COUNTY 0FORANGE ) ON BEFORE ME, A NOTARY PUBLIC)N AND FOR SAID STATE,PERSONALLY APPEARED AND PERSONALLY KNOWN T0ME(OR PROVED TOMEON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE) T08E THE PERSONS WHOSE NAMES ARE SUBSCRIBED T0 THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGES TO ME THAT THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITIES, AND THAT BY THEIR SIGNATURES ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSONS,OR THE ENTITY UPON ' BEHALF 0F WHICH THE PERSONS ACTED,EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. WITNESS MYHAND SIGNATURE MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS|S NOTARY PUBLIC/N AND FOR SAID STATE IN COUNTY _ (NAME PRINTED) MY COMMISSION EXPIRES __________ '9on � CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT - - ---- ---------- - - ----- State of California County Of San Diego On 5/30/96 before me, Melanie Anderson, Notary Public DATE NAME.TITLE OF OFFICER-E.G..-JANE DOE.NOTARY PUBLIC' personally appeared Jerome L. Hren NAMEIS)OF SIGNERIS) ' personally known to me - OR - ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), MELANIE ANDERSON comm.#1070617 or the entity upon behalf of which the H �� NOTARY PUBLIGCALIFORNIA U) SAN DIEGO COUNTY 0 person(s) acted, executed the instrument. V My Commission Expires At1GUST 27,1999 WITNESS my hand and official seal. SIGNATURE OF NOTARY OPTIONAL Though the-data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT ❑ INDIVIDUAL ❑ CORPORATE OFFICER Monumentation Bond No. CBB1457 - TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT TITLEIS) ❑ PARTNER(S) ❑ LIMITED ❑ GENERAL 1 ® ATTORNEY-IN-FACT NUMBER OF PAGES ❑ TRUSTEE(S) ❑ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR ❑ OTHER: 5/30/96 DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSONIS)OR ENTITY(IES) National American Insurance Company SIGNER(S)OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE i I NATIONAL AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY Bond OMAHA, NEBRASKA Number CBB 1457 PRINCIPAL: NAME,ADDRESS POWER OF ATTORNEY CITY,STATE,ZIP ORIGINALS OF THIS PONVER OF ATTORNEY ARE PRINTED ON BLUE Broadmoor Beach LLC,a California Limited Liability SAFETY PAPER. DUPLICATES SHALL HAVE THE SAME FORCE AND Company EFFECT ASAN ORIGINAL ONLY WHEN ISSUED IN CONJUNCTION WITH 5405 Oberlin Drive,Ste. 200,San Diego, CA 92121 THE ORIGINAL. KNOW ALL MIEN BY THESE PRESENTS:That the National American Insurance Company,a corporation duly organized under the laws of the Slate of Nebraska,having its principal office in die city of Chandler,Oklahoma.puirstam to the rouowing resohnioo,atlop'cul EFFECTIVE DATE by the Board of Directors of the said Company on the 81h day of.fuly. 1997.to wit: -Resolved,that:my officer of the Company shall have authorily to make,execute:md deliver a Power of Anorncy constituting as Attorney-in-facl, such persons, firms, or 05/30/96 corporations as may be selected from time to time. CONTRACT AMOUNT Resoh ed That nothing in this Power ofAtorney shall be consuuecd as a grant of authorily to the attorneys)-in-fact to sign,execute,acknowledge,deliver or otherwise issue a policy or $ 3,600,00 policies of insurance on behalf of National American Insurance Company. Be It Further Resolved,that the signature of any officer and the Seal of the Company BOND AMOUNT may be affixed to am such Power of Attorney or any certificate relating thereto by facsimile. and any such Power of Attorney or certificate bearing such facsimile signature or facsimile $ 3,600.00 seal shall be Valid and binding upon the Company and any such powers so executed and certified by facsimile signature and facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company in the future rk ith respect to any bond and documents relating to such bonds to which it is attached."National American Insurance Company does hereby make.constitute and appoint Jerome L. Hren its true and lawful auorney(s)-in-fart.,s'ith full power and authorily hereby conferred in its name,places and stead,to sign,execute,acknowledge and deliver in its behalf,and its act and deed,as follows: The obligation of the-Company shall not exceed one million(S 1.000,000.00)dollars. And to bind National American Insurance Company thereby as fully and to the same extent as if such bonds and documents relating to such bonds acre,signed by the duly authorized officer of the National American Insurance Company.and all the acts of said Auorney(s)pursuant to the authority herein given,are hereby ratified and confirmed. IN 1%IT\ESS WHEREOF.the National American Insurance Company has caused these presents to he signed by any officer of the Company and its Corporate Seal to be hereto affixed. tM uNsu vps` „[oe ,4, NATIONALANIERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY �o 4,e n C SEAL a �� e,/ ,1� r�4 W.Brent LaGere,Chairman&Chief Executive Officer Oy AMA 'r[l11.SI1► STATE OF OKLAIIONIA I COUNTY OF LINCOLN ) SS: On this Slh day of.truly,A.D.1997.before me personally came W.Brent LaGere,to me known,who being by me duly sworn,did depose and say;that he resides in the County of Lincoln,Stale of Oklahoma:that he is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the National American Insurance Company,the corporation described in and which executed the above instrument:that he knoa:s file seal of said corporation:that the seal affixed to the said instrument is such corporale seal:that it was so affixed by order of the Board of Directors of said corporation and that he signed his name,thereto by like order. �HOA Vrtl 10, pTA �9 , MIrBII o SC u.,e a e,o*r.Mo+�� �COIM COVE Notary Public STATE OF OKLAHONLA I My Commission Expires August 30,1999 COUNTY OF LINCOLN ) SS: 1, the undersigned,Assistant Secretary of the National Arerican Insurance Company,A Nebraska Corporation,DO IIERIi11Y CERTIFY that the foregoing and attached POWER 01-A7TORNEN"remains in fill force. Signed and Scaled at(lie City of Chandler. o,rom" Dated file (fail( 19 96 3 thY�IayWinifred E.Mendenhall,Assistant Secretary ,:J.UN-19-96 WED 10:06 AM MDS SULTING FAX NO. 714461 0516 P. 05/05 r 06/18/1996 15:09 1 049 MISSION PAGE 04 JufN - 18 - 9r6 TVE J1A : 32 Rc+ p4--1 F Vr i ver Cam . ice . 04 11F NIP �s''C. ;:Y•Ir'.F -i p ' RR rAW 1 CY,R 7I11S CtATWICAT6 IS ISSVYD AJ,A MATTVA OP 1NFORMV09"OP ON AM c4 rvv$NO AraIITE WON TIM Cr.II'I'IFICATR I(OLDRR.YI(CI CXXTIWAVA pLw4 N(1T AMT.Nn.IXTURD,OR A1.1Y1i TIII;COYKIIACS AR+FOR WO VY'Iylk !"OIJC1SS 7/MA1r . ROUXIRT F-DRTYUR CO..INC. 1620 sTH Avi;NNB COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE _ COWAN r SAN INUG9.CA 92101.VO3 "Trull A cDA1rANY 4�>ti1lv.D l Solt NFTtrA CVttPANT LLTTTGf C OIOridifto Ntririe.'F SouUmSt Im 1;Qmr4NY 5401 O artn1 Drire,he 200 S(� 0.� 16TTTSR D FAIRMONT INSIlRANCS Sm Diego CA 12121.3 COWARY ,xt,�rRa E :.,;.�+.k:.!::...�'� �'...G� :�-�+�.�:. '� -w,� '� - (n• •� '{, .. „a.} - ..P...,'� Myli.., yiic,.;�.'�..:i:��.:�..::0.. .,..�w".: IUIS p TO C►7tTIPY T1T1T T11C TOLICItN W 1*g1VIlANCIr 1,111 Tpp DRLOW IL11 K fllry?t T"QKO YOTIM(MI MlD NAMED&%Ova WR Y11Y,r'or.1CT YFRIO17 114tweV1,93).N01'Wr111STAMlNC AMT11-VIS"w"?,T1:AM OR e0t(DIT ON UTAMvconrrRACT'OR OTIISR POCVl1H71T IVIT11 T11Lvl-ki.?TO W111 C11RT119 CY.111111CATIK MAY Ott TATM OR MAY VI;RTAIN,TIM IM MA NCA ArrVRngpaT vim rA1JCIl(R nEACRRRSDIIfti11IINRfF sVivnt:r'rv•r,t.tvk�kcOTs, 1.ACIA*I Fd ANY)CONPITIOkS(W tutu YOIJGItt.I.4M 11110N'N MAY TIA VR RI(►dV warlWO ov mm CLAIMS, Ct7 IOLG OT(NiVRA T Cv►, TOf16Y6X1. 1f"t(f YtR NCB POttCt NVMpI.R 7u DAYCWMND/rYl pA'►6(MMR10/VN ctatlwAL vATIn ny can RAL A00W,00% COW►t,6>.TIIS>tAL�IAl11TJTY I' 004 MRIOrACC., CI.AI+Sf MA(Ily ACC. 7XIES.w Al".IWOtT ' uY►YI:It`S♦trC(k11trACT`;TROT IGEROCCYRRIWCi P/l(R:MMAO TAall M I ' AV'TOYRODII.R 1,1A1N1ATY C0�T1►INa11 AtNt:T,>j ANT AVIV TITKr r ALL OWNIM A VrfA` 11001LV 1N)URV 1p,u/V1.1:D Al)f'O6 Gtir'IAToA) NOR- QIWNRI)AVROS �OCAYIN7URY QIr IIe11Ma> r'.AR1CS MAIIIIATV Pitman RAMAM (:xt!Itlr IJAlt1.1TY KACII 2ULMIASH4M 1.Trtaanm.tJY IORM AccllrcATs mA IMAN VMCIU MA YORA1 D 6tf649006 1/0119f1 1lOI/07 )( 3TATTJTfNIYLf4 ITB ti IVIYSIwxs CrIIT1'FNSNTION - AND RACIR ACCRIUM RMr10T8M1`f I,rAe1LlYY UaIVIWOt0+•1CT WM1T 1 � Pg RAN GtAC1;1W. mT>ER APROVED D1:4t�ulrnr+A�treamRAno�+vsoeATlorenalvcR,IswsrvelAt.lncFns GAIL HUTTON,. City Attorney :. Deputyttorney •C � ' I .h �....i� a.r ' .x. 3;.t.. 1j -� ' YYl�18 i LJC a r.l. •`�41�b r SITIYVI•D ANY OW TtIR AIuYVR Df'S nlncarnr r a a:a'.r:::.�:::�••��"`• CIIIS SSK CANCRI.Y.V.fl TMMKIS TIM . . KI,r1RA S!1TION DATItTItRavolt,TIM IM44"N6cw-ANY Wrr.I.KNI)RAvoll To CITY OF K VN7'JNO'fOy ROACHAIAI►, �_ 'MVdw•ar"YKMryrirxTOT11M YJ .CkWIVICA"KI$QNCRNAMYp'1'OT11Y. Lt;YT,!L't vATf,T1RJ;to A(ATL earn nfYrres�uL1.IMIWiB No onracATION c111 ATTN:DONIS COLTER R.uelr.ITY eY Aruv,arro vl�'n1R epWrANT,r FS AcI•,vrs ox nlFr Ara tur,Arr�a:. IOW MAIN STRBb'I H(RITI vG1700 6404 !(.CA 92648 Avrr Rx A c r ,......::;......;.y..[:/:I. .il:-i-::.........�•I :�:3:•i L:ti:v ♦♦\.1/,.�. v.,t. l� h{ /YYI SS 'D 'C hl /DD `i,,.' 1 UL A7 rti:.^1Y: �� �. :�.�: ::-Y••(w•n.,�A ri•••±•.(t•v,.rr.vvn•n rn•n / /�) ':'�.y::• _ r.L'.w _ ).•AI•N•MnY.Vi. �.��... .:... ......v..........rrl.:........r.Y ..,v..v+.,t,wn•n at nr,twa N:,... ....::-v. :.v.,..v.. `......n..,..a v.w u,. r I ac)Duc):Je TWS MT1r'fCA'VV'is ISSUED AS A R OF INFORMATMN ONLY AND CON)xlls,o Wil l's UPON THL Ck ATE HOLDER,VIN rERTIMCA•I'E DOES'NOT OR AI.TF,R T11C COYLRACf APFORnrn BY TITF J'01:JC'IE,C n1iL01Y ROBERT F. DRIVER CO., INC. COMPANEM AFFORDING COVERAGE 1620 5TH AVENliE COM PA•N Y SAN DIEGO, CA 92101.2703 LRTTER A, CENTURY SURETY COMPANY COMPANY B L1',T rICR JN;llfLliD I CON(MNY C I.V1`ER BroadmDor Beach I,LC COMPANY 5405 Oberlin Drive, Ste 200 11;'rT1:R D San Dicgo CA 92121-3 c�Ntrnti�' LP.'CTrR V ('M•i et �ill,J;1>'�\.l�t,;N..:. - -:n..,.:n:•I:rn,• '.rr rr•n r:.•- - -.•'r i•:ii w,.... rtBE:IS TO C:E'kl IVY TI[A7"1'1lC 1'OLiC1S;S OY imuRANcr,f,(ST!<I)111'1,015'HAv4:ltk'I N ISS1:Q TO T1V'INSURED NASIES)ABOVL FOR TJII(POLICY PRRIOD INDICATI-A).NOTWITHSTANDINC ANY REQUIRCMENT,TERM Oil CONDITION Oil ANY CO.I'RACT OR(Yr1WR DOCUMENT WIT11 RESPECT TO WHICH T111S (It"ttTll'ICA•rl•: S(+ R?NIA RE'ISCD OLAY PL•'R'WN,TIM 1NSURANcr A1'GOR(Hm IIY'l'tw.t'OLICIm DCSCk(!►CD I11tRT:1N IS SUIUkC1'TO ALL TIIE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND C0NJ)1TJOVS(V SUCII POLICIES.LIAfITS S1TON"NIA V 11AVV.AFFN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIN(S. co TY PIC OP iNS1,RANCE, POLICY NUMBER POLICY I(PP. POLICY W. AX DATE(MMIDDIVY) DATE,0011WNY) 1•)�H rs A CGNERAJ,LLIIIMITY CCI>134235 611719E 6/17/97 CI:NERAL AGM RCATK 1000000 _ C:OMKI,CHIVRAI,LIAnIL.)a'Y PROD-COM1110V AGO. 1(lnff(I(1V (:I.nJMS MnDE �OCC. PERS.h ADY,INJURY ((��K)00 (WNNI('S ti CONTRACT'S PROT RACII OCC 016NCE I000000 F)RE DAMACI<(Oao Ficc) Mpl).I:XP.(Ono Part AUTOMOBILE LIAIIILITY r ANY AUTO GAIL II. TO,t COMIt1N1(uSINGI,u 4ri' G' ,.Y k.Y r,I,rlrr ALL OWNED AUTOS C 1`1'%r 1I00II,Y INJURY 011:0ULED AUTOS (Per porn) DIRED ALTOS A. crneY an De u `y BODILY INJURY NI]N.OWNED AUTOS Q4r NCOacnU (;ARA(;E),IAhWTY PROVIERTY DAMAGP, EXCESS LIA)jILITI' CACJC OCCURNf,N4E unfnkEl.1.A p()kM nCCAECATA 0Tlll•;R'1'))AN UMhR1;1.1,A Ff)RN1 A�i1J'L• ' tqt t y;r:;;��,, r !'N STATOTORY LJMITS %VOKKVXs'COMMNSATION AT ACHED rncH Accu)1:Nx AND --- DISKASY.-POLICY LIMIT k:YtrI,oYl;r,'s Iannu.rry —�. DISr.AS1':.rACJ %1P. UTORIC 00Cit11110N Ott O1CIiR All ONSILOCATIONSA1:1IICLESWECIA1.ITRNIS ADDITIONAL,INSURED; CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH,ITS AGENTS,OF1'ICERS, AND EMPLOYERS, • ,.. .: .•,..... ...... ..,,,..,..,Ern,.,. _..... ,..,•,,.:f„:::::'.:.., i k 1 �\ ail+:N•+ Ct1t7Yt.ICA 1 t:.<tlt�l..t�1�,1� t ANc T. MOULD TINY 01-THE ADOVE DrSCR111E11 I'U[,lCLC3 RC Cm cm.Lu o1CFORR THE EXPIRATION 1)AT1 TJ1CR1:01T,'I'lll:INSVING CONIPAN MAIL .gin DAYS N'R11'1'UN NOTICE,TOT HE CHWI.111CATr 1101,I)ER NAMED 1`0 1'111., Lr;1•`r,3thl`�Wkh�lltlk�4t�l,f�,IcA�lt�tiK►k�7L7111�ttlk'lo�ts7tlititDlpKl4xbC�tAtilc CITY OF IHUNTINGTON BFACII 2060 MAIN STRsu AUTIIO R 0MV 'r HUNTINGTON'BLACH,CA 92649 vl 't�1.,1�r-Y2�•�n,4) �I.r \ .:Ylr Yh�Ya ,I e.li..Y.r .. ...- ..• •. Y.I..i 1: •n•:n-.tl.. - -IL - - J -,.•.vY'.v...nvYA•4:•'•' yvr v:v.•.r.n v.yn A..,..: - .......•.:v•,1H-..:..1. -.....Ervtixvhrhl.Ynvlvl•(Y:':4•M.ury�.Fn•.(.Mu.v.v.,.FI.:M1}•rr. :�r r.•. ?X-:.,- •... ... 1 o F,P 1.1 POLICY NUMBER: CCP134235 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. CG 20 10 11 85 ADDITIONAL INSURED - OWNERS, LESSEES OR CONTRACTORS (FORM B) This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART. SCHEDULE Name of Person or Organization: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 JOB: BROADMOOR BEACH LLC TRACT #15071 (If no entry appears above, information required to complete this endorsement will be shown in the Declarations as applicable to this endorsement . ) WHO IS INSURED (Section II) is amended to include as an insured the person or organization shown in the Schedule, but only with respect to liability arising out of "your work" for that insured by or for you. CG 20 10 11 85 Copyright, Insurance Services Office, Inc., 1984 S o z 0 o leoo nDo ° BoLSA `` - ARGOSY S = EDINGER \ NEIL WARNER WARNER SLATER iALBERT V ELLIS O J < i GARMILD �H 3 YORKTOWN SITE ��b I -DAMS \. r INDIANA►OLIS PiIANTA Y DR. - . a C. 2 �I E � / MAA11liON MR LL[IM o •l•5 /// 7 / 44R1 8 a _� { e4PT4 ♦A 7 � 09 OR1 W OPPO BAT UI TENTATIVE MAP TENTATIVE - TRACT 15071 IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH OOr •T BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE "" " Q s,TE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 27 TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH RANGE 11 WEST RANCHO LA BOLSA CHICA " _WARNER AVENUE , P • LOCAT'CN MAP 9 STREET SECTIONS ATHENA DRIVE PROJECT SUMMARY SITE ACREAGE-3.7 ACRES ElasnNG SrTE USE-NURSERY r i • EGSING NO PROPOSED ZOMK-R-1 LON DENSRY RRSMERIK i I I i PROPOSED LARD USE-SAME FAMLT DETACHED HOES R-1 LON DEIBIT RESOF7M 0[D f K YIG RD OF LOTS-IT 1ROFDiiU LOT SITE -6,000 SOIWR FEET YPO" SW 4rR �I i 7,100 SQUARE FEET AVERAGE EXISTING SINGLE FAM. TR. 5590 w`"A I N I `snr a w lr I (;I; 0 OEHSHT 1,6 D.UJAC. MLJICAI COIJiT KOX:STREETS ARE PROPOSED I'o I I I�- I III (STD.PLAN 104) KWE UINES ARE RRWUSED d K r .: i it SEWER:CRY OF HUNRICTON BEACH M7C >oyR AMe An WAU:CRY OF HUNENGTON BEACH r r •r r r i rEECDaC:lDunfTa curaRHA ED 5011 C01PNT u � [Dm I�I rmT.>a umra a CAS:SOUmm CNfOR10A CAS COIWAM t+ 12 13 �14 A, [ � °& RLEFdOE:G.T.E. R L 17 ' �' „I ili k FAaE 1V:PARAGONrwr 6.9 3.6 3.6 IA __ _ 1•S _a TRASH:Reim01AVSAL NL�' + r. r °a I i�nl I - EIaSTNO SIRUCDARARES ON THE SrrE A TO BE REM(NED la I m A, F Ln i 15 16 lli a >WT MATCHES EXIST.IMP'SP. MADERA LANE ENGINEER OWNER ( NORM l SOUTH ) _ _ °fi. J a� CONAILIITIG MR.HROSH WAOMA INE W / S•1 a _ _ '� 4 '�^ 3 Jr 11�II z o N aAr r. •IS wf PH(714)$47-7914 ui 11 ,.� - - ° III V) [ Z w orA. A +m R�_ +'F I'li z N S ° R I i w^ I PREPARED FOR.SUBDIVIDER: { ---a-� ---- --- S y 1.1 2 III w 11 BROADMOOR HOMES °'°'°"°'>� r )0 � [aRw � IRimPn +6 rri i r° I [ Bw[YArr[.IK =J- / k 6 W W /.! W f NA sairnA¢ 1 i `Vrm a 5.8 1 I., EDWARD3 STRffT 4 10 9 8 I'll o ao •o m •Ieo r '6 [l H• fA^ I J 7 I NOTES FOR SECTIONS Z I!I o-fa..aA�NA m".m �• PR Of— EXISTING SINGLE FAM. TR. 5601 W F III MDS,a. co v ur'/,v a ■ raaA.0 mnr KAw �� 4 IYB19YK[ M�`Il R4 „ �� iu°e�m• Nall a riAArC Awa r � v a aw A1.r.W mama, AHnaro SLATER AVENUE • 1Wsnc AIM-•AL •A,�fL O OF 1[B[R a s FLL AArf IIHNr rAmaa s— Hoo>m saa x.ofVrtH1 n-m-RD —r— wrrosro.uol —>_ o®AR mnau pas "93D F►f--ID 3Y 30.00' I� 100.3D00' G0' NOTHING FOUND. NOTHING FOUND NOTHING FOUND EXISTING BLOCK g WALL 0.30' N'LY o a _ Cy0' e .moo \ u OF LINE `2 i ,ri 17 30' I 30' � rJ "° v 12 13 W 14 r w o b N 89'29'11'V 117.20' n ;- N 89'46'31'V IN y ti' z 62.20' 55.00' Q a.5. $ N 4437'54" 14.18' -27.37' _Q ,.�P►�� 15 W 16 x w Z N 840.017'V t�sSRp L..) V 140.95, 8.68' I � a �, I � N 89'46'3'V 100 FO. REMAINS OF OLD N 0'30'43'E a REDWOOD STAKE F NO TAG, I o 0 12.00' z L NO REF., 0.30' C'LY OF 4 A m en BLOCK WALL i° I� W O pJ W W 4 eV• ai c-i PI 3 $ ` -_40.83-- --46.44'- 1� e 1 6 b N 89'29'11'V 87.27'---F � Zv '_ MUKAI COURT_ N �a'� - -- - E 1033T - lP��']0�' \ N Tg'29'4 9.50' I N 89'29'17'V 166.27' L` \ N 89'46'31'V 109.0E N 04 89'29'17'V 211.40' y pj2acjE r!� 9 19.38' ----64.40'---- ----64.36'---- -- 63.24'--- �;, �\ �yo l�oy` 'S iv �o� vi _ _ o j N 89'46'31'V 120.00' ...�, 1 O n ` v � < � W � W 9 8 7 e 6 ti )UND ~NOTHING FOUND, SET o 0 0 I C RAMSET NAIL & TAG k TAG STAMPED'LS.o z z l I 1 _ 4693' IN TOPO OF BLOCK WALL z NOTHING FOUND, EXISTING BLOCK WALL 0 LINE. 5 ' 2�4 I l EST. PER TIES TRACT 5601, FD. NOTHING, SET NOTHING. 70.00' 75.00' 64.40' 64.38' 00' I 49-00 20.00') (108.001) (108.00') (20.00') (94.34') (30.00') 130.00' 507i78' , (100.001) \ I N 89'29'17'V 527.78' l 527.78' RECORD PER TR. 5601 ) I (30.0') \ 4-5 / I � LL - f -6 - - 37 1--1 3-1 . r I I I I e b t, FD. REA TRACT J RA 1 1�10, 60 1 INJUN�1. 7 19/ 3 l5 I < z j � R.R. SP i ACCEPTE CURVE TABLE PER � _r \ REPLACE 1 DELTA RADNS ARC LIST TAN .�� \� J r1 Y N r 7 fD. R.R. SPK. PER STAMPE[ FIT 90'17'14' 49.98' 7876' 5023' r r TCE55 0 ,TAGS FD. PUNCHED Jr� 90.00'00' 26.00' 40.84' 26.00' EASEMENT NOTES DRIVE PER TRACT 67 90.17'14' 19.00' 29.94' 19.10' NO TAG. 90'00'00' 29.00' 45.55' 29.00' CPS N0. 5081 45'00'00' 29,00' 45.55' 29.0' 0 INDICATES AN EASEMENT TO THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES NARTHINr. = " Huntington Beach Planning Commission - NI�/NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN P.O. Box 190 California 92648 Date: .December 15, 1995 NOTICE OF ACTION Applicant: Broadmoor Homes Southwest, Inc., 5402 Oberlin Dr., Ste. 200, San Diego, CA 92121 ProRem Owner: Mr. Hitoshi Mukai, 17292 Madera lane, Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Subject: TFIN TATIVE TRACT MAP NO. l 50 71;CONDITIONAL USE PEKtVUT NO. 95-72N.ARLANCE NO. 95-1&N-T-GATIVE DECLAR TiON N0. 95-8 Your application was acted upon, by the Huntington Beach Planning Commission on December 12. )995 and your request was: WITHDRAWN APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS XX (see artached). DISAPPROVED VARIANCE NO. 95-16 (see attached). TA3LED CONT124"UED UNTIL Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance code, the action taken by the Planning Commission is final unless an appeal is filed to the City Council by you or an interested party. Said appeal must be in writing and must set forth in detail the actions and grounds by and upon which the applicant or interested parry deems himself aggrieved. Said appal must be accompanied by a filing fee of twelve hundred (S1,200) dollars and be submitted to the City Clerk's office within ten(10) days of the date of the Commission's action. In your case, the last day for filing an appeal and paying the filing fee is December 22. 1995 Provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code are such that any application becomes null and void one(1) year after final approval, unless actual construction has started. (pcna045-1) J� Huntington Beach Planning Commission P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 December 15, 1995 Broadmoor Homes Southwest, Inc. 5402 Oberlin Dr., Ste. 200 San Diego, CA 9212) SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT NCAP NO. 15071!CONDITION.AL USE PERMIT NO. 95-72.1VARITANCE N0. 95-16 NEGATIN'E DECL.i—LATION:\O. 95-8 PROPERTY W-NER: Mr. Hitoshi l64ukai, 17292 Madera Lane, Huntington Beach, CA 92647 REQUEST: To permit the subdivision of approximately 3.7 acres into 17 lots for purposes of developing i 7 one and two story detached single family residential units. The reouest includes an at) roximate)y 10 foot high block vvall, up to four feet of which is retaining wall, along Edwards Street. A variance is requested to allow a „gall on Ed,va.7d;s Street in lieu of a 5ve foot -;ide landscape area r equi;ed by code. LOCATION: 17301 Edwards Street (600 feet north of Slater Avenue on the west side) . DATE OF ACTION: December FINDINGS OF APPROVAL- CONDITION.kL USE PERMIT NO. 95-72: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 95-72 for the establishment, maintenarice.and operation of the 17 unit single family homes and for a ten foot high block wall, up to four (4) feet of which is retaining wall, along Edwards Street will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. The proposed grading, site layout and design of the subdivision with a cul-de-sac with access from Athena Drive only properly adapts the proposed structures to streets, driveways, and other adjacent structures and uses in a harmonious manner. The street improvements for Madera Lane will match the improvements on the existing segments of Madera Lane where practical. The proposed project will comply with the City of Huntington Beach infill ordinance and has proposed a mix of one and two story units that are compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. The block wall along Edwards Street will match existing wall segments on either side of. Edwards Street. (pcc1001-1) 2. The proposed use ly with the provisions of the base _*which is Low Density Residential and tot applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and any specific condition required for the proposed use in the district in which it would be located. The proposed project meets all provisions of the code, including lot size, setbacks, density, and parking requirements. The wall height along Edwards Streets is permined with a conditional use permit. 3. The granting of the conditional use permit for construction of the 17 single family units ,AU not adversely affect the General Plan. It is consistent with the Land Use Element designation of Residential Low Density on the subject property. In addition, it is consistent with the following goals and policies of the General Plan: a. The attainment of decent housing within a satisfying living environment for households of all socioeconomic, racial and ethnic groups in Huntington Beach. (Housing Element) b. To encourage and maintain a v,,ell balance variety of residential densities and uncrowded li\tine em�ronrnents by encourazing rational use of land and other natural resources. (Land; U.-Se ileileiat MMINGS FOR DENLAL - N7ARIANCE NO. 95-16: 1. The granting Variance No. 95-16 to permit no landscape area along Edv,-ards Street ;n lieu of a five (5) foot xide area is not necessary 10 preserve the enioxment of one or more substantial property rights. The site can be fully developed at permitted densities and meet all provisions of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdr6sion Ordinance while pT017dLn`n the {1p, (,) fvoot A7ne lcnriSCarvwz area :vi Chi C4r1 i:,C1ude ix0 (2) GEi Cf piibilC right-of way and three (3) feet of-ri 2. There are no special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size; shape, topography, location or surroundings, that make the strict application of the -zoning ordinance deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classification. The subject lot will be vacant after demolition of structures and is a generally regular shaped area. The project desjgst incorporates fill that will level the site, therefore, topography is not a_*t obstacle to incorporating the landscape area. FINDINGS OF APPROVAL- TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15071: 1. The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan and applicable provisions of this Code. Tentative Tract Map No. 15071 for a 17 single family detached unit subdivision is consistent with the goals and policies of the HTr+tltittgton Beach General Plan, including the Housing and Land Use Elements. (pcc)001-2) 2. The site is physical' lie for the type and density of devei The site is relatively flat and physically suitable for the proposed density of six units per net acre. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time that the General Plan designation of Low Density Residential (7 units per acre), and Residential Low Density zoning were implemented. The size, depth, frontage, street width, and other design features of the proposed subdivsion with a cul-de-sac with access from Athena Drive only are in compliance with the standard plans and specifications on file with the City as well as in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and the supplemental City Subdivision Ordinance. The proposed single family residential subdivision is designed to integrate with the existing neighborhood with public streets and sidewalks. 3. The design of the-subdivrision or the proposed improvements will not cause serious health problems or substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. Notwrthsiandlne the foregoing, the Planning Commission or t 1 t f 7'�'i -tn. such ter. >e r..+o.-. ;-r n i�n..r.. t 1 rt Zoning Adm:r. s ra er �v a -o��e s a . z:i. ,,.;.• .. a er:ve:,,a: i:::pa" report was prepared wlih respect to the project and a finding Nyas made that specific economic, social or other considerations make infeasible the r itioa*inn rneasu. c project alternatives ides.:{ed in the en\-irnn e-ial .rnract repel:�The env,c;-; er _1 '� t assessment or the proi'ec: CCncili�e5 i,`.fii the vrO;eC.i, �%•�ih ,i�iilgailon measures, 11, have a less than stgTuficani e?IecI on the environment. i 4. That the design ofthe subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict w7th s easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of. property within the proposed subdivision unless alternative easements, for access or for use, will be provided. The subdivision N%611 provide all necessary easements and will not affect any existirg easements. CON-DMONNS OF APPROVAL- TENTATr E TRACT 15071: 1. The tentative tract map received and dated November 15. 1995 shall be the approved layout with the following modifications: a. Revise map to show a three (3) foot landscape easement along the easterly edge of The site, adjacent to Edwards Street, and a two (2) foot landscaped area in the public right-of-way. b. Revise map to reflect a cul-de-sac street and knuckle design with access from Athena Drive only and include a 24 foot wide emergency access easement along the westerly edge of Lot 1 to the southern segment of Madera Lane. The northerly end of the southern segment of Madera Lane shall be modified to include a cul-de-sac design that will be connected with the 24 foot wide emergency access easement without reducing the number of units for the project. The design of the revised street layout and cul-de-sac shall be subject to review and approval by the Departments of Fire, Public Works and Community Development. 2. The following conditions are required to be completed prior to recordation of the final map unless otherwise stated. Bonding may be substituted for construction in accordance with provisions of the subdivision map act. (PW�: (pcc1001-3) F $a a. The following Adedicated to the City of Huntingtoi..��: 1. The water system and appurtenances. 2. The sewer system and appurtenances. 3. The two foot public utility easement. 4. Three foot landscape easement adjacent to Edwards Street. S. Sub-surface water rights. b. Twenty-four (24) foot emergency only access easement through Lot 1. b. All streets shall be dedicated to the public. e. All vehicular access rights to Edwards Street shall be released and relinquished to the City of Huntington Beach. d. Any existing water serti�ice shall be abandoned, at the main, per Public Works Water Division spec:t-9ca:ions. e. Fire hydrant locations shall be approved by the Fire Department. f. Hydroloz, and hvdraulic studies shall be submined for Public Works re'6ew and approval and shall address the provisions of Chapter 222 of the Huntington Beach. Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. ;nc*Jud;nP Section 222.10C. g. A sewer study shall be submitted for Public Works approval. The developer shall design and construct the sewer system reouired to serve the development. h. The developer sli4ii instGil nevv cilrv, and sidevvalk acid retain rig '✓✓ali 0.^1 Edwards Street, adjacent to the Tract boundar: per Public Works requirernenis. i. The developer shall remove and replace the existing raving to center'.ine On Edwards Street, adjacent to the tract boundary, per Public V%orks requirements. A service life of 20 years shad be provided for. j. The proposed sidewalks on ?Madera Lane shall meet A.D.A. and Public Works Standards as depicted on the site plan. k Underground all existing dry utilities along Edwards Street. 1. Signing, striping and street lighting shall be designed and constructed in accordance with Public Works Standards. m. Drainage flows from adjacent properties shall not be obstructed. Flows shall be accommodated per Public Works Standards. n. On-site drainage shall not be directed to adjacent properties, but shall be handled by a Public Works approved method. (pcc)001-4) o. The engineer or .. .y r preparing the final map shall tie i,.-Odary of the map into the Horizontal Control System established by the County Surveyor in a manner described in Sections 7-9-330 and 7-9-337 of the Orange County Subdivision Code and Orange County Subdivision Manual, Subarticle 18. p. The engineer or surveyor preparing the final map shall submit to the County Surveyor a digital-graphics file of said map in a manner described in Sections 7-9-330 and 7-9- 337 of the Orange County Subdivision Code and Orange County Subdivision Manual, Subarticle 18. q. Lot 16 shall have a 10 ft. by 10 ft. corner cut-off providing site distance to lot 17. r. Lot 6 shall have a 10 ft. by 10 ft. corner cut-off providing site distance to lot 32 of Tract 5601. The developer shall attempt to quitclaim the 10 ft. by 10 ft. area to said lot 32. Any re-construction necessary, such as block walls, landscaping, etc. shall be at the developers expense. 3. Prior to submittal of the final maD- for aaaroval by the Cir. Council. the foilo vinE shall be required.- a. An Affordable Housing Agreement Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Cornrnunity Deve,op;mem Depa;Lmert. The plan shall provide for ,;,ir=::u::, 10 percent of the housing units (equal mix of two units) approved to be affordable to families of low and moderate income level (average 100% of Orange County median) for a period of thirTv years. Said plan shall be executed prior to issuance of the first building perms for the tract. The a_*?ordaole units sl:-tl '•r+e under cans::uct?c_. or available to he public, prior to finial u'.::iui%9 reiiLt anpr ova. (oc-cu-ea�icy) Of t,le first home. b. The developer shall meet-Arith the appropriate school districts with the ir:tent to mitigate the impact on school faciliiies. LNFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS - TENTATIVE TRACT M6,P NO. 15071 1. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid prior m map recordation. (PW) 2. Park and Recreation Fees shall be paid prior to acceptance of the final map by City Council or at issuance of building..permits, whichever occurs first. 3. Tentative Tract Map No. 15071 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-72 shall become null and void unless exercised within two (2) years of the date of final approval. An extension of time may be granted by the Planning Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Division a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. 4. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of S25 for the posting of the Notice of Determination at the County of Orange Clerk's Office. The check shall be made out to the County of Orange and submitted to the Department of Community Development within two(2).days of the Planning Commission's action. (pccI00I-5) CONDITIONS OF A, A&L- CONDITIONAL USE PEI-- 0. 95-72: 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated November 15, l 995 shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following modifications: a. Revise site plan to show a three foot landscape easement along the easterly edge of the site, adjacent to Edwards Street, and a two (2) foot landscaped area in the public right-of-way. b. Revise map to reflect a cul-de-sac street and knuckle design with access from Athena Drive only and include a 24 foot wide emergency access easement along the westerly edge of Lot 1 to the southern segment of Madera Lane. The northerly end of the southern segment of Madera Lane shall be modified to include a cul-de-sac design that will be connected with the 24 foot aide emergency access easement v7thout reducing the number of units for the pr ojer. The design of the revised street layout and cul-de-sac shall be sJuieci io review and appr u,'si 4y-,he Deparmie;-ts of r:re. Public Works and Community Development. c. Revise site plan .o. sh.ox decorative ,:,a•...,_ .;, cn•.•ev.•ays of jots ,0D anu t 2. 2. Prior to any demolition, grading or excavGting activity, the following shall be completed: a. The applicant shall pro,,�ide thirty days xvrmaen notice to the City of Huntington Beach Hstoric Resources Board. The Board document the structures and equipment on site. b. Any asbestos con:W'ned Cher em shag be icenafied and r emo•ve� in compliance 'v'ith City, State and Federal standards, inc'nuding an asbestos abateme.-it urOgTa.'n, 10 be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and Buiidirg O ;cial.* c. A contingency plan shall be submitted for review and approval to the Huntington Beach Fire Department. The plan Aill identify procedures and contacts for instances when hazardous substances are encountered on-site.* d. Any pesticides or other hazardous substances contained on the site or in the structures shall be identified and removed in compliance-,%it- City, State and Feder al standards. e. The applicant shall submit a tract map to Orange County Vector Control one (1) month prior to grading activity and arrange an inspection of the site. The applicant shall comply with the rodent control plan recommended by Orange County Vector Control. A copy of the control plan shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development for inclusion in the entitlement file. 3. Prior to submittal for building permits, the following shall.be completed: a. Names of streets shall be approved by the Huntington Beach Fire Department prior to use in accordance with City Specification I�'o. 429. (FD) (pcc1001-6) b. Submit three (3) . piathe site plan to the Planning Divi„OO addressing purposes after street name approval by the Fire Department. c. Depict all utility apparatus, such as but not limited to back flow devices and Edison transforms, on the site plan. They shall be prohibited in the front and exterior yard setbacks unless properly screened by landscaping or other method as approved by the Community Development Director. d. Floor plans shall depict natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at the location of clothes dryers; natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units; and low-volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. e. If foil-type insulation is to be used, a fire retarding tape shall be installed as approved by the Building Department and indicated on the floor plans. f. If outdoor lighting is included; high-pressure sodiu„ vapor lamps or similar energy savings 12rnps shall be used. All ou-Side li=htin shall di: c o "s '" " _ g be -e teo t t;r eti�ent ;:,;,,age onto adjacent propemes and shall be no,=-: on tiie site plat', and eie,,ations. g. The site plan shall include (or reference page) all conditions of approval imposed on the project printed verbatim. ? Model numbers; let nu„Moers and street na;,,es shiall be depicted on the site plan. h. A detailed site Man of the emer eencv accessine shall be reviewed and aDnroved by the Community Development Department and Fire Department. The plan s hall identi rernoval of a 24 foot a,de po.. of the e?:is-,:- bioliC v.--a i at the ,no hernu7,ost end of the southern segment ef'•':ader a Lane and i;,c,alation of paver hlocks•%ith locked gates in this location. The gate stall be equ;pped ,.;.;,h a knox box. 4. -.Prior to issuance of grading permits, thefollo-,%zng shall be completed: a. Wall plans shall be submitted and approved by the Department of Community Development. Double walls shall be prohibited; prior to the construction of any new walls, a plan must be submitted ieenti_l�-^:ng the removal of any existing walls next to the new wall, and shall include necessary homeo-wner's approval. b. A plan for silt control for all water runoff from the property during construction and initial operation of the project may be required if deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works. (PW) 5. Prior to issuance of building permits, the following shall be completed: a. Submit copy of the revised site plan, floor plans and elevations pursuant to Condition No. 1 for review and approval and inclusion in the entitlement file. In addition, the following information shall be noted on the plans: (pcc]001-7) 1. Buildings or. .sand 12 shall have an automatic sp. 4ystem installed throughout to comply with Huntington Beach Fire Department and Uniform Building Code Standards. Shop drawings shall be submitted to and approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. A one (1) inch water service is required for automatic sprinklers. (FD) 2.. Two new fire hydrants shall be installed prior to combustible construction. Shop drawings shall be submitted to the Public Works Department and approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. (FD) 3. Address numbers will be installed to comply with City Specification No. 428.(FD) b. A grading plan, prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval (by issuance of a grading permit). (PW) c. A detailed soils analvsis shall be prepared by a registered eneineer. This anal\sis shall include on-site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations for grading. che.milcal and fill pr Ope;ales; ivi:n%ai;GnS; retairilr,p- walls, streets; and utilities. (PW) d. The applicant shall submit a site plan depicting the Mode] homesisaies ofce; and parking lot locations to the Department of Community Development for review 2.*ad approval. e. The Final Map shall be accepted by the City Council, recorded -with the Orange Co' ntv Recorder and a c 0 P V tiled 'with tiie DeYu u:,en. of CoaTiu—:—V Development. f. Final design elevations of grading shall net vary from elevations show;, on 1.;e tentative map by more than one (1) foot. (PW) g. A Street Improvement Plan, prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public Works Department. (PW) h -A Landscape Construction Set must be submined to the Departments of CoTnmunin Development and Public Works and must be approved. The Landscape Constriction Set shall include a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State Licensed Landscape Architect which includes all proposedlexisting plan materials (location, type, size, quantity), an irrigation plan, a.grading plan, an approved site plan, and a copy of the entitlement conditions of approval. The landscape plans shall be in conformance with Chapter 231 of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. The set must be approved by both departments prior to issuance of building permits. (PW) i. An erosion control plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works. (PW) (pcc1001-8) }. The developer s : Out a separate utility plan, showing AWstem improvements including service connections to each building, fire hydrant, valves, backflow devices and other appurtenances in accordance with applicable U.P.C., City Ordinances, Public Works Standards and Water Division design criteria. These plans shall be approved prior to any construction by the Public Works Water Division and the City of Huntington Beach Fire Department. (PW) k Abandon the existing on-site water well per State codes. (PW) 1. Submit a letter of map revision from FEMA declaring the tract exempt from floodplain requirements or submit copy of completed FEMA Elevation Certificates for each unit. m. Submit a construction vehicle control plan to Department of Public Works for review and approval: n. An interim parking and/or building materials storage plan shall be subrvtted to the Department of Co im, unity,Development to assure adequate parking is available 'Jur employees. customers. col-M actors, etc.; uu,-ii:8 the pr oject's cons jc-ion phase. o. Installation or removal of underground flammable or combustible liquid storage tanks shall comohv with Orange Counry Environ,rniental Health and Hun-Line-Lon Beach Fire Department requirements. p. The placement and storage of the diesel tark-(s) or any fla=,,able substance shall be reviewed and approved by the Huntington Beach Fire Department p.-or to construction. " b. During construction; the applicant shall: a. Use water trucks or sprinlder systems in all areas where vehicles travel to keep damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site: b. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day: c. Use low sulfur fuel (.05%) by weight for construction equipment: cL Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days(first stage smog alerts), e. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts. (pcc1001-9}- 7. Prior to final buildi. at approval of the first single famil) .,*e following shall be completed: a. Pursuant to a landscape plan reviewed and approved by the Departments of Public Works and Community Development, the applicant shall replace the 18 inch (trunk size) Podacarpus at a 1:1 ratio, relocate(transplant)the 12 inch Windmill Palm and save the three Plumeria bushes (four inches each). All trees will replaced/relocated on site. b. If the tract is not considered exempt by FEMA, a second Elevation Certificate will be required for each unit "as built". c. All improvements (including landscaping)to the property shall be completed in accordance,x6th the approved plans and conditions of approval specified herein. d. Compliance v,tith all conditions of approval specified hereir, shall be accomplished. e. A reproducible molar copy of the recorded final Trap, along %xith a digital graphics file of the recorded map, shall be submitted to tie Depwnment of Public lJorks. (PvN') f. The applicant shall obtain the-necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District and subr,vt a copy to Co,;:munity Development Department. g. All building spoils, such a unusable lumber, U�ire, pipe; and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an of site facility equipped to handle them. S. Construction shall be listed to 7:00 .zVI to E00 PM Mond-ay.- F-ivay and 8:00 AMto. 5:00 PM on Saturday. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REWMENfENTS - CONTDITIONAL USE PERMIT N O. 95-72: 1. Traffic Impact Fees shall be paid at the time of final building inspection of the first a^�t. (P ) 2. A construction permit shall be required for all utork the public r.2ht-of-way. (PEW) 3. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code,- Building Division, and Fire Department as well as applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards. 4. State-mandate school impact fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. 5. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Conditional Use Permit No. 95-72 and Variance No. 95-16, pursuant to a public hearing, if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance or Municipal Code occurs. * Mitigation Measure (pccI001-10) I hereby certify that Ten, veoct Map No. 15071, Conditional i...e rit No. 95-72 and Negative Declaration No. 95-8 were approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach on December 12, 1995 upon the foregoing findings and conditions. Please be advised that the Planning Commission reviews the conceptual plan as a basic request for entitlement of the use applied for in relation to the vicinity in which it is proposed. The conceptual plan should not be construed as a precise plan reflecting conformance to all Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance requirements. I hereby certify that Variance No. 95-1 b was denied by the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach on December 12, 1995 upon the foregoing findings. It is recommended that you immediately pursue completion of the conditions of approval and address all requirements of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance in order to expedite the processing of your total application. Sincerely, Howard Zelefskv, Secretary Planning Commission By (/ 1. Scott Hess, AICP Senior Planner (pccI001-11) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CONNIE BROCKWAY CITY CLERK July 12, 1996 First American Title Insurance & Trust Attn: Mr. Ron Gomez 114 E. 5th Santa Ana, CA 92702 Attention: Mr. Ron Gomez Regarding: Tract Map No. 15071 This is to inform you that all fees have been paid and conditions met on the above named tract. You are free to record same at your convenience. After recording, please return two prints of the Tract Map to Bruce Crosby, Department of Public Works, P. 0. Box 190, Huntington Beach, CA 92648. Sincerely, Connie Brockway, CIVIC City Clerk C B:cc Enclosure Received by: GAG/— e--52' --- Dated: 71 F� g:\fol lowu p\tractmap (Telephone:714-536-5227) Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk ire P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 FEB 2 96 ' z ' _ _ ._,...,.. ..� CALM a F ;i�'. }• INGTO,y 110-342-32 �O� iNC�RPON1lF� �F,�� Mer4i , Cameron TR y Personal & Confidential ._ 1503 S coast ,,: x � ' 1 oe.► � . ,�-.._.M....... ++Cff ` i � cJ�E'7 Iv E a `�� _....._ °' c IT�� t CE - PUBLIC HEARING - LEGA II,1FillFill$It111111uil,lil„1 1 • Council/Agency Meeting Held: o � Y ���� � �✓� i9 -GdAl y`/`,FA/ Deferred/Continued to:&/E& IAVI 11 -r WNW- .151-Fal"Nmod-- Ci Clerk's Signature Council Meeting Date: February 5, 1996 Department ID Number: CD 96-1 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS SUBMITTED BY: MICHAEL T. UBERUAGA, City Admini / (�_ PREPARED BY: MELANIE S. FALLON, Community Development Directo"X��/*_� SUBJECT: APPEAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 15071/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-72/VARIANCE NO. 95-16/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 95-8 Statement of Issue,Funding Source,Recommended Action,Alternative Actions),Analysis,Environmental Status Attachments) Stateme f Issue: Transmitted for your consideration is an appeal by Broadmoor Homes Southwest, Inc., applicant, of the Planning Commission's approval of a development proposal located on Edwards Street approximately 600 feet north of Slater Avenue. The approved entitlements include Tentative Tract No. 15071, Conditional Use Permit No. 95-72 and Negative Declaration No. 95-8. Variance No. 95-16 was denied. The project consists of the subdivision of 3.7 acres and construction of 17 detached single family residential units. The conditional use permit includes an approximately 10 foot high block wall, up to four feet of which is retaining wall, along Edwards Street. The variance request is to allow a wall along Edwards Street in lieu of a five foot wide landscape area. As originally proposed by the applicant, and supported by staff, the development would have through street access via the existing north and south segments of Madera Lane. On December 12, 1995, the Planning Commission approved the subdivision with a cul-de-sac street design having access only from the north end of the proposed tract. This action was a result of concerns expressed by existing residents of the south segment of Madera Lane. The design approved by the Planning Commission necessitates that fire sprinklers be installed in six additional units in the project (eight units total). The appeal is based on the economic hardship that will be placed on the project in order to comply with the City's fire specifications. The applicant has indicated that given the small scope of the project, this additional cost, coupled with the increase in water rates that was adopted after the applicant's project was submitted for processing, will significantly reduce the economic feasibility of the project. Funding Source: Not applicable. Recommended Action: A. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Motion to: 1. "Uphold the Planning Commission's action and approve Negative Declaration No. 95-8 with findings-and mitigation measures (ATTACHMENT NO. 5)", and 2. "Uphold the Planning Commission's action and approve Tentative Tract No. 15071 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-16 with findings and conditions of approval (ATTACHMENT NO. 3. "Uphold the Planning Commission's action and deny Variance No. 95-16 with findings for denial (ATTACHMENT NO. 1)." Planning Commission Action on December 12, 1995: THE MOTION MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECONDED BY KERINS, TO APPROVE NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 95-8, TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 15071 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-72 WITH FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL AND DENY VARIANCE NO. 95-18 WITH FINDINGS FOR DENIAL (ATTACHMENT NO. 1) CARRIED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: LIVENGOOD, BIDDLE, HOLDEN, KERINS, TILLOTSON, SPEAKER NOES: GORMAN ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE MOTION PASSED B. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Motion to: 1. "Uphold the Planning Commission's action and approve Negative Declaration No. 95-8 with findings and mitigation measures (ATTACHMENT NO. 5)", and 2. "Approve Tentative Tract No. 15071 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18 as originally 0 designed with through street access (ATTACHMENT NO. 7) with findings and conditions of approval (ATTACHMENT NO. 2)." 3. "Uphold the Planning Commission's action and deny Variance No. 95-16 with findings for denial (ATTACHMENT NO. 2)." Alternative Action(s): The City Council may make the following alternative motion: 1. "Deny Tentative Tract No. 15071/Conditional Use Permit No, 95-72/Variance No. 95- 16/Negative Declaration No. 95-8 with findings for denial." i - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTI1 MEETING DATE: February 5, 1996 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD 96-1 Analysis: A. PROJECT PROPOSAL: Applicant/Appellant: Broadmoor Homes Southwest, Inc., 5402 Oberlin Drive, Ste. 200, San Diego, CA 92121 Location: 17301 Edwards Street (west side of Edwards Street, 600 feet north of Slater Avenue) Tentative Tract Map No. 15071 is a request to subdivide a 3.7 acre former nursery site into a 17 lot subdivision consisting of 17 single family residential units pursuant to Title 25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (HBZSO). The lots average 7,174 square feet in lot area, ranging from 6,300 square feet to 10,829 square feet in size. The applicant proposes access from Madera Lane via connection of the two existing Madera Lane segments, to the north and south of the subject site. A new cul-de-sac, with access from Madera Lane, is also proposed and will have a length of 301 feet. All streets will be public. Grade differences between the adjacent properties and the project site will not exceed two feet. Conditional Use Permit No. 95-72 is a request to construct 17 detached single family units pursuant to Section 210.02 and Section 210.06 "RL Property Development Standards" of the HBZSO. Nine units are one-story, and eight units are two-story. The product types range in size from 3,100 to 3,610 square feet. The conditional use permit request includes an approximately 10 foot high block wall, three to four feet of which is retaining wall, along Edwards Street pursuant to Section 230.88 A.7.b "Site Standards" of the HBZSO in lieu of a maximum eight foot high wall (6 foot wall on 2 foot retaining wall). The HBZSO requires a conditional use permit for a retaining wall on the property line of a rear yard abutting an arterial highway if it protects a fill greater than two feet. Variance No. 95-16 is a request to locate a wall along the Edwards Street right-of-way property line in lieu of a five foot wide landscape area along the arterial pursuant to Section 210.06 " of the HBZSO. The proposal includes vine treatment along the wall to match existing planting on the wall at the south corner of Edwards Street and Athena Drive. The applicant requests the variance for three reasons. First, the applicant notes that the five foot wide landscape area is not provided anywhere else on Edwards Street in the project vicinity. Second, the landscape area would reduce the rear yards of the five lots on Edwards Street by five feet to 15.5 feet thus lessening the buffer between the units and street noise. Finally, the applicant thinks that vine treatment along the wall would provide adequate visual relief to motorists and pedestrians on Edwards Street. CD96-01.DOC -2- 01/23/96 5:46 PM • REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTIM MEETING DATE: February 5, 1996 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD 96-1 Appeal On December 12; 1995, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract No. 15071 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-72 with a cul-de-sac street design instead of the through street. The approved design necessitates that the applicant incur additional costs to comply with the City's Fire Department specifications. Although the applicant is in agreement with the street design approved by the Planning Commission, the applicant has appealed that decision because of the economic burden the approved design creates. The-financial hardship on the project is exacerbated by the increase in water rates that went into effect 11 days before the applicant's project was approved by the Planning Commission. This cost will be incurred by the applicant irrespective of the additional fire requirements. The two costs combined, however, present a significant, unforeseen financial impact on the project. B. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION: As originally proposed by the applicant, the project would connect the two existing Madera Lane segments and provide through access for the neighborhood. This design approach resulted in two flag lots for which the Fire Department requires fire sprinklers. The cul-de- sac street design approved by the Planning Commission eliminated the through street, however, and increased the number of units that require fire sprinklers to a total of eight. (Exhibits A and B, on pages 4-5, show the two subdivision alternatives.) The increase in units requiring fire sprinklers stems from the change in design and a Fire Department specification that stipulates that no street segment from a through street to the end. of a dead-end street exceed 600 feet. (The Fire Department requirements are presented in Attachment No. 8.) This standard was established to avoid long roadways that could be blocked because of accidents, flooding, etc. The design approved by the Planning Commission results in a cul-de-sac street segment 699 feet long. Thus, to insure adequate fire protection, the Fire Department requires that the units (five) beyond the 600 feet measurement have fire sprinklers. An additional flag lot will be created as a result of the cul- de-sac design and will also require fire sprinklers (for a total of six additional units). The City Council may wish to consider the original design proposed by the applicant based on the fire safety and circulation considerations identified below. This design also minimizes the number of units requiring fire sprinklers. Fire Safety 1. Currently, the roadway from Morro Bay Lane to the end of the southern Madera Lane . segment is 835 feet; a through street would correct this existing deficiency. CD96-01.DOC -3- 01/23/96 5:46 PM • REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTIN MEETING DATE: February 5, 1996 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD 96-1 EXHIBIT A SUBDIVISION DESIGN APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 12 1995 0 0 0 0 0 O O CG G E 0 0 0 0 - . �TN6eJA DR 1 v 6 �j e o L r�l 0 0 o �orl ' C e % e C. C. LL 6 j@ c- n E r I Lc 0 o � o~ co SS t I � tv tc `I I CD96-01.DOC -4- 01/23/96 5:46 PM REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTIM MEETING DATE: February 5, 1996 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD 96-1 EXHIBIT B ORIGINAL SUBDIVISION DESIGN SUBMITTED BY APPLICANT TENTATIVE MAP YI^ TENTATIVE TRACT 15071 ' - IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 27 TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH RANGE 11 WEST RANCHO LA BOLSA CHICA WARNER AVENUE E — ---- ATHENA DRIVE rail r K..rt. rasl r scv 'I' -• - ��SM SlKll ' rKi.- EXISTING SINGLE FAM. TR. 5590 Isp { ran.so u1Rn ,t 12 13 /14 A M. raslpc l,s `: .J vaciwl I;� 17 ch {; In In 15 16 InIL m LJ a 1 1 b• c —r- - h 3 - i n All �,'� lLKAL R II in -lLj - � X nano[ a+'aPa wq �4, La S. 10•, �I� a I(aSIN 1 1.9 /.9 .9 /.! 1 sanun / k Iasi+L I:I; / nxecnmr - G 3.9 C10 9 T >s=\� 1i. -p. - _xP f. i LEGM 9� k H LK m am EXISTING SINGLE FAM. TR. 5601 ' S Y I: W r ao Q aux lKl f K rlu 1 R• M ICI Fm ran f KP R fm aR1Q bx YK9 Uwm R 1[l.Wa and R C'V CM am av��M 11.K IrR G r01i(KASr) SLATER AVENUE r l x 4 133m rrus"IXC r.xt. aer Lam L s -s- anon aao -f- FRDF=.94 - CD96-01.DOC -5- 01/23/96 5:46 PM • n REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTI09 MEETING DATE: February 5, 1996 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD 96-1 2. As noted, the cul-de-sac design creates a second fire safety deficiency for the new project because the length of the new cul de sac from Athena Drive would be 669 feet. 3. The approved plan with an easement to allow fire access between the existing and the new development will still result in delays to response time. 4. A through street ensures the fastest possible response time by emergency vehicles. Circulation 1. Better circulation is achieved for residents and emergency vehicles by providing two access points, to the south and north, for the proposed tract. It also is better for existing residents because it allows for two egress and ingress opportunities in the event of an emergency (accidents, flooding, etc.). 2. A through street does not place the impact of all trips on residents to the north of the tract as the alternate plan would do. 3. The existing southern segment of Madera Lane does not meet current standards for a turn around area necessary for trucks, vehicles, etc. Staff recommends the City Council approve the original design proposed by the applicant because the through street approach provides the safest and most equitable alternative from the perspective of fire safety and traffic circulation, as enumerated above. Should the City Council prefer the cul-de-sac design approved by the Planning Commission, staff recommends that the applicant comply with the City's Fire Code requirements and install the additional fire sprinkler systems to ensure adequate fire protection for the area. C. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: During the December 12, 1995 Planning Commission meeting 19 individuals, representing 14 households on the south side of the project site, spoke in opposition to the proposal to make Madera Lane a through street. These residents cited the following concerns: increase in noise, crime, traffic and vehicle speeds; impacts to drainage; and affect on flood exemption status. (Staff responded to these concerns in the Planning Commission Staff Report, Attachment No. 4.) The residents also noted that they were not opposed to the project itself. No other persons spoke in opposition to the project. In response to the concerns of the residents, the Planning Commission voted to change the project design by eliminating the connection of the two existing Madera Lane segments and having access only from the northside of the project site via Athena Drive. The Planning Commission stipulated that this design change should not reduce the number of units in the project and that an emergency access easement be provided between the project site and the southern Madera Lane segment. CD96-01.DOC -6- 01/23/96 5:46 PM • REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTIN MEETING DATE: February 5, 1996 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD 96-1 D. SUMMARY The cul-de-sac street design approved by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract No. 15071 results in the need for additional fire protection for approximately one-third of the project. The applicant has appealed this decision because of the increased costs associated with installing the required fire improvements. Staff recommends that the City Council consider the original street design proposed by the applicant because: • The through street design provides the best means of ensuring adequate fire protection for new and existing residents by eliminating existing deficiencies in street design and by allowing for the quickest possible response times. • The through street design offers the safest circulation system, providing two access points in case of emergency, and provides for a more equitable trip distributiion in the surrounding.area. Staff believes that this design will benefit both new and existing residents in the area. This approach also reduces the financial impact to the developer by minimizing the number of units requiring fire sprinklers. Environmental Status: Staff reviewed the environmental assessment and determined that no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed project that could not be mitigated to a level of insignificance with proper design, .engineering and proactive measures. Subsequently, Negative Declaration No. 95-8 (ATTACHMENT NO. 5) was prepared with mitigation measures pursuant to Section 240.04 of the HBZSO and the provisions of the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA). The Department of Community Development advertised draft Negative Declaration No. 95-8 for twenty (20) days commencing on November 2, 1995 and ending on November 21, 1995. Comments were received from Huntington Beach Union High School District concerning potential impacts to its facilities from students generated as a result of the project and a response has been included with the attached Negative Declaration. Prior to any action on Tentative Tract No. 15071, Conditional Use Permit No. 95-72 and Variance No. 95-16, it is necessary for the City Council to review and act on Negative Declaration No. 95-8. Staff, in its initial study of the project, is recommending that the negative declaration be approved with findings and mitigation measures. CD96-01.D0C -7- 01/23/96 5:46 PM REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTIM MEETING DATE: February 5, 1996 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD 96-1 Attachment(s): City Clerk's Page Number _..... .... . ..... _. 1. Findings and Conditions of Approval for TT 15031/CUP No. 95-72/ ND No. 95-8 and Findings for Denial for Variance No. 95-16 for cul- de-sac design without through street access (Planning Commission Recommendation) 2. Findings and Conditions of Approval .for TT 15031/CUP No. 95-72/ ND No. 95-8 and Findings for Denial for Variance No. 95-16 for through street access (Staff Recommendation) 3. Letter of Appeal from Broadmoor Homes Southwest, Inc. dated 'December 22, 1995 4. Planning Commission Staff Report dated December 12, 1995 5. Negative Declaration No. 95-8 6. Site Plan, Floor Plans and Elevations dated November 15, 1995 7. Tentative Tract Map No. 15071 dated November 15, 1995 8. City of Huntington Beach Fire Specification No. 401 9. Letter in support of Madera Lane as a through street dated January 2, 1996 CD96-01.DOC -8- 01/29/96 9:52 AM AT'"I'1� ....... .............. ..... C ------------ FINDINGS AND SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-72/ VARIANCE NO. 95-16/ TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15071 FOR CUL-DE-SAC DESIGN WITHOUT THROUGH STREET ACCESS (PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION) FINDINGS OF APPROVAL- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-72: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 95-72 for the establishment, maintenance and operation of the 17 unit single family homes and for a ten foot high block wall, up to four(4) feet of which is retaining wall, along Edwards Street will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. The proposed grading, site layout and design of the subdivision with a cul-de-sac with access from Athena Drive only properly adapts the proposed structures to streets, driveways, and other adjacent structures and uses in a harmonious manner. The street improvements for Madera Lane will match the improvements on the existing segments of Madera Lane where practical. The proposed project will comply with the City of Huntington Beach infill ordinance and has proposed a mix of one and two story units that are compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. The block wall along Edwards Street will match existing wall segments on either side of Edwards Street. 2. The proposed use will comply with the provisions of the base district which is Low Density Residential and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and any specific condition required for the proposed use in the district in which it would be located. The proposed project meets all provisions of the code, including lot size, setbacks, density, and parking requirements. The wall height along Edwards Streets is permitted with a conditional use permit. 3. The granting of the conditional use permit for construction of the 17 single family units will not adversely affect the General Plan. It is consistent with the Land Use Element designation of Residential Low Density on the subject property. In addition, it is consistent with the following goals and policies of the General Plan: a. The attainment of decent housing within a satisfying living environment for households of all socioeconomic, racial and ethnic groups in Huntington Beach. (Housing Element) b. To encourage and maintain a well balance variety of residential densities and uncrowded living environments by encouraging rational use of land and other natural resources. (Land Use Element) FINDINGS FOR DENIAPIVARIANCE NO. 95-16: • 1. The granting Variance No. 95-16 to permit no landscape area along Edwards Street in lieu of a five (5) foot wide area is not necessary to preserve the enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights. The site can be fully developed at permitted densities and meet all provisions of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance while providing the five (5) foot wide landscaped area which can include two (2) feet of public right-of-way and three (3) feet of private property. 2. There are no special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, that make the strict application of the zoning ordinance deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classification. The subject lot will be vacant after demolition of structures and is a generally regular shaped area. The project design incorporates fill that will level the site, therefore, topography is not an obstacle to incorporating the landscape area. FINDINGS OF APPROVAL- TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15071: 1. The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan and applicable provisions of this Code. Tentative Tract Map No. 15071 for a 17 single family detached unit subdivision is consistent with the goals and policies of the Huntington Beach General Plan, including the Housing and Land Use Elements. 2. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of development. The site is relatively flat and physically suitable for the proposed density of six units per net acre. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time that the General Plan designation of Low Density Residential (7 units per acre), and Residential Low Density zoning were implemented. The size, depth, frontage, street width, and other design features of the proposed subdivision with a cul-de-sac with access from Athena Drive only are in compliance with the standard plans and specifications on file with the City as well as in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and the supplemental City Subdivision Ordinance. The proposed single family residential subdivision is designed to integrate with the existing neighborhood with public streets and sidewalks. 3. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not cause serious health problems or substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Planning Commission or Zoning Administrator may approve such a tentative map if an environmental impact report was prepared with respect to the project and a finding was made that specific economic, social or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report. The environmental assessment for the project concludes that the project, with mitigation measures, will have a less than significant effect on the environment. 4. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision unless alternative easements, for access or for use, will be provided. The subdivisi n will provide all necessary easements a9will not affect any existing easements. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15071: 1. The tentative tract map received and dated November 15, 1995 shall be the approved layout with the following modifications: a. Revise map to show a three (3) foot landscape easement along the easterly edge of the site, adjacent to Edwards Street, and a two (2) foot landscaped area in the public right-of-way. b. Revise map to reflect a cul-de-sac street and knuckle design with access from Athena Drive only and include a 24 foot wide emergency access easement along the.westerly edge of Lot 1 to the southern segment of Madera Lane. The northerly end of the southern segment of Madera Lane shall be modified to include a cul-de-sac design that will be connected with the 24 foot wide emergency access easement without reducing the number of units for the project. The design of the revised street layout and cul-de-sac shall be subject to review and approval by the Departments of Fire, Public Works and Community Development. 2. The following conditions are required to be completed prior to recordation of the final map unless otherwise stated. Bonding may be substituted for construction in accordance with provisions of the subdivision map act. (PW) a. The following shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach: 1. The water system and appurtenances. 2. The sewer system and appurtenances. 3. The two foot public utility easement. 4. Three foot landscape easement adjacent to Edwards Street. 5. Sub-surface water rights. 6. Twenty-four (24) foot emergency only access easement through Lot 1. b. All streets shall be dedicated to the public. c. All vehicular access rights to Edwards Street shall be released and relinquished to the City of Huntington Beach. d. Any existing water service shall be abandoned, at the main, per Public Works Water Division specifications. e. Fire hydrant locations shall be approved by the Fire Department. f. Hydrology and hydraulic studies shall be submitted for Public Works review and approval and shall address the provisions of Chapter 222 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, including Section 222.1OC. . A sewer stud shall Pe submit for Public Works r g y submitted o ub c Wo s app oval.�e developer shall design and construct the sewer system required to serve the development. h. The developer shall install new curb, gutter and sidewalk and retaining wall on Edwards Street, adjacent to the tract boundary, per Public Works requirements. i. The developer shall remove and replace the existing paving to centerline on Edwards Street, adjacent to the tract boundary, per Public Works requirements. A service life of 20 years shall be provided for. j. The proposed sidewalks on Madera Lane shall meet A.D.A. and Public Works Standards as depicted on the site plan. k. Underground all existing dry utilities along Edwards Street. 1. Signing, striping and street lighting shall be designed and constructed in accordance with Public Works Standards. m. Drainage flows from adjacent properties shall not be obstructed. Flows shall be accommodated per Public Works Standards. n. On-site drainage shall not be directed to adjacent properties, but shall be handled by a Public Works approved method. o. The engineer or surveyor preparing the final map shall tie the boundary of the map into the Horizontal Control System established by the County Surveyor in a manner described in Sections 7-9-330 and 7-9-337 of the Orange County Subdivision Code and Orange County Subdivision Manual, Subarticle 18. p. The engineer or surveyor preparing the final map shall submit to the County Surveyor a digital-graphics file of said map in a manner described in Sections 7-9-330 and 7-9- 337 of the Orange County Subdivision Code and Orange County Subdivision Manual, Subarticle 18. q. Lot 16 shall have a 10 ft. by 10 ft. corner cut-off providing site distance to lot 17. r. Lot 6 shall have a 10 ft. by 10 ft. corner cut-off providing site distance to lot 32 of Tract 5601. The developer shall attempt to quitclaim the 10 ft. by 10 ft. area to said lot 32. Any re-construction necessary, such as block walls, landscaping, etc. shall be at the developers expense. 3. Prior to submittal of the final map for approval by the City Council, the following shall be required: a. An Affordable Housing Agreement Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Department. The plan shall provide for minimum 10 percent of the housing units (equal mix of two units) approved to be affordable to families of low and moderate income level (average 100% of Orange County median) for a period of thirty years. Said plan shall be executed prior to issuance of the first building permit for the tract. The affordable units shall be under construction, or available to the ub�, prior to final building permit approval�ccupancy) of thefirs t home. b. The developer shall meet with the appropriate school districts with the intent to mitigate the impact on school facilities. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15071: 1. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid prior to map recordation. (PW) 2. Park and Recreation Fees shall be paid prior to acceptance of the final map by City Council or at issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. 3. Tentative Tract Map No. 15071 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-72 shall become null and void unless exercised within two (2) years of the date of final approval. An extension of time may be granted by the Planning Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Division a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. 4. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of$25 for the posting of the Notice of Determination at the County of Orange Clerk's Office. The check shall be made out to the County of Orange and submitted to the Department of Community Development within two (2) days of the Planning Commission's action. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-72: 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated November 15, 1995 shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following modifications: a. Revise site plan to show a three foot landscape easement along the easterly edge of the site, adjacent to Edwards Street, and a two (2) foot landscaped area in the public right-of-way. b. Revise map to reflect a cul-de-sac street and knuckle design with access from Athena Drive only and include a 24 foot wide emergency access easement along the westerly edge of Lot 1 to the southern segment of Madera Lane. The northerly end of the southern segment of Madera Lane shall be modified to include a cul-de-sac design that will be connected with the 24 foot wide emergency access easement without reducing the number of units for the project. The design of the revised street layout and cul-de-sac shall be subject to review and approval by the Departments of Fire, Public Works and Community Development. c. Revise site plan to show decorative pavers in driveways of lots 1, 10 and 12. 2. Prior to any demolition, grading or excavating activity, the following shall be completed: a. The applicant shall provide thirty days written notice to the City of Huntington Beach Historic Resources Board. The Board will document the structures and equipment on site. b. An asbestos contamed therein shall be identified and removee9n compliance with Y P City, State and Federal standards, including an asbestos abatement program to'be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and Building Official.* c. A contingency plan shall be submitted for review and approval to the Huntington Beach Fire Department. The plan will identify procedures and contacts for instances when hazardous substances are encountered on-site. d. Any pesticides or other hazardous substances contained on the site or in the structures shall be identified and removed in compliance with City, State and Federal standards.* e. The applicant shall submit a tract map to Orange County Vector Control one (1) month prior to grading activity and arrange an inspection of the site. The applicant shall comply with the rodent control plan recommended by Orange County Vector Control. A copy of the control plan shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development for inclusion in the entitlement file. 3. Prior to submittal for building permits, the following shall be completed: a. Names of streets shall be approved by the Huntington Beach Fire Department prior to use in accordance with City Specification No. 429. (FD) b. Submit three (3) copies of the site plan to the Planning Division for addressing purposes after street name approval by the Fire Department. c. Depict all utility apparatus, such as but not limited to back flow devices and Edison transforms, on the site plan. They shall be prohibited in the front and exterior yard setbacks unless properly screened by landscaping or other method as approved by the Community Development Director. d. Floor plans shall depict natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at the location of clothes dryers; natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units; and low-volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. e. If foil-type insulation is to be used, a fire retarding type shall be installed as approved by the Building Department and indicated on the floor plans. f. If outdoor lighting is included, high-pressure sodium vapor lamps or similar energy savings lamps shall be used. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties and shall be noted on the site plan and elevations. g. The site plan shall include (or reference page) all conditions of approval imposed on the project printed verbatim. Model numbers, lot numbers and street names shall be depicted on the site plan. h. A detailed site plan of the emergency accessing shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department and Fire Department. The plan shall identify removal of a 24 foot wide portion of the existing block wall at the northernmost end of the southern seg9t of Madera Lane and installation of por blocks with locked gates in this location. The gate shall be equipped with a knox box. 4. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the following shall be completed: a. Wall plans shall be submitted and approved by the Department of Community Development. Double walls shall be prohibited; prior to the construction of any new walls, a plan must be submitted identifying the removal of any existing walls next to the new wall, and shall include necessary homeowner's approval. b. A plan for silt control for all water runoff from the property during construction and initial operation of the project may be required if deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works. (PW) 5. Prior to issuance of building permits, the following shall be completed: a. Submit copy of the revised site plan, floor plans and elevations pursuant to Condition No. 1 for review and approval and inclusion in the entitlement file. In addition, the following information shall be noted on the plans: 1. Buildings on lots 1, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 shall have an automatic sprinkler system installed throughout to comply with Huntington Beach Fire Department and Uniform Building Code Standards. Shop drawings shall be submitted to and approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. A one (1) inch water service is required for automatic sprinklers. (FD) 2. Two new fire hydrants shall be installed prior to combustible construction. Shop drawings shall be submitted to the Public Works Department and approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. (FD) 3. Address numbers will be installed to comply with City Specification No. 428.(FD) b. A grading plan, prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval (by issuance of a grading permit). (PW) c. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered engineer. This analysis shall include on-site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations for grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations, retaining walls, streets, and utilities. (PW) d. The applicant shall submit a site plan depicting the Model homes/sales office, and parking lot locations to the Department of Community Development for review and approval. e. The Final Map shall be accepted by the City Council, recorded with the Orange County Recorder and a copy filed with the Department of Community Development. f. Final design elevations of grading shall not vary from elevations shown on the tentative map by more than one (1) foot. (PW) • g. A Street Improvement Plan, prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public Works Department. (PW) h. A Landscape Construction Set must be submitted to the Departments of Community Development and Public Works and must be approved. The Landscape Construction Set shall include a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State Licensed Landscape Architect which includes all proposed/existing plan materials (location, type, size, quantity), an irrigation plan, a grading plan, an approved site plan, and a copy of the entitlement conditions of approval. The landscape plans shall be in conformance with Chapter 231 of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. The set must be approved by both departments prior to issuance of building permits. (PW) i. An erosion control plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works. (PW) j. The developer shall submit a separate utility plan, showing water system improvements including service connections to each building, fire hydrant, valves, backflow devices and other appurtenances in accordance with applicable U.P.C., City Ordinances, Public Works Standards and Water Division design criteria. These plans shall be approved prior to any construction by the Public Works Water Division and the City of Huntington Beach Fire Department. (PW) k. Abandon the existing on-site water well per State codes. (PW) 1. Submit a letter of map revision from FEMA declaring the tract exempt from floodplain requirements or submit copy of completed FEMA Elevation Certificates for each unit. in. Submit a construction vehicle control plan to Department of Public Works for review and approval. n. An interim parking and/or building materials storage plan shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development to assure adequate parking is.available for employees, customers, contractors, etc., during the project's construction phase. o. Installation or removal of underground flammable or combustible liquid storage tanks shall comply with Orange County Environmental Health and Huntington Beach Fire Department requirements. p. The placement and storage of the diesel tank(s) or any flammable substance shall be reviewed and approved by the Huntington Beach Fire Department prior to construction. 6. During construction, the applicant shall: a. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems in all areas where vehicles travel to keep damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site: b. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day; c. Use low sulfur fuel . 5%)by weight for construction equip; d. Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days (first stage smog alerts); e. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts. 7. Prior to final building permit approval of the first single family unit, the following shall be completed: a. Pursuant to a landscape plan reviewed and approved by the Departments of Public Works and Community Development, the applicant shall replace the 18 inch (trunk size) Podacarpus at a 1:1 ratio, relocate (transplant)the 12 inch Windmill Palm and save the three Plumeria bushes (four inches each). All trees will replaced/relocated on site. * b. If the tract is not considered exempt by FEMA, a second Elevation Certificate will be required for each unit "as built". c. All improvements (including landscaping)to the property shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans and conditions of approval specified herein. d. Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein shall be accomplished. e. A reproducible mylar copy of the recorded final map, along with a digital graphics file of the recorded map, shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works. (PW) f. The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District and submit a copy to Community Development Department. g. All building spoils, such a unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. 8. Construction shall be limited to 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM Monday -Friday and 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM on Saturday. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-72: 1. Traffic Impact Fees shall be paid at the time of final building inspection of the first unit. (PW) 2. A construction permit shall be required for all work within the public right-of-way. (PW) 3. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, Building Division, and Fire Department as well as applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards. 4. State-mandate school impact fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. 5. The Planning CommisSeserves the right to revoke Conditiorese Permit No. 95-72 and Variance No. 95-16, pursuant,to a public hearing, if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance or Municipal Code occurs. * Mitigation Measure ...... ........................................................ .... �' CH1�I.�NT 2 .................. FINDINGS AND SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-72/ VARIANCE NO. 95-16/ TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15071 FOR CUL-DE-SAC DESIGN WITH THROUGH STREET ACCESS (STAFF RECOMMENDATION) FINDINGS OF APPROVAL- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-72: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 95-72 for the establishment, maintenance and operation of the 17 unit single family homes and for a ten foot high block wall, up to four(4) feet of which is retaining wall, along Edwards Street will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. The proposed grading, site layout and design of the subdivision properly adapts the proposed structures to streets, driveways, and other adjacent structures and uses in a harmonious manner. The street improvements for Madera Lane will match the improvements on the existing segments of Madera Lane where practical. The proposed project will comply with the City of Huntington Beach infill ordinance and has proposed a mix of one and two story units that are compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. The block wall along Edwards Street will match existing wall segments on either side of Edwards Street. 2. The proposed use will comply with the provisions of the base district which is Low Density Residential and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and any specific condition required for the proposed use in the district in which it would be located. The proposed project meets all provisions of the code, including lot size, setbacks, density, and parking requirements. The wall height along Edwards Streets is permitted with a conditional use permit. 3. The granting of the conditional use permit for construction of the 17 single family units will not adversely affect the General Plan. It is consistent with the Land Use Element designation of Residential Low Density on the subject property. In addition, it is consistent with the following goals and policies of the General Plan: a. The attainment of decent housing within a satisfying living environment for households of all socioeconomic, racial and ethnic groups in Huntington Beach. (Housing Element) b. To encourage and maintain a well balance variety of residential densities and uncrowded living environments by encouraging rational use of land and other natural resources. (Land Use Element) FINDINGS FOR DENIA - VARIANCE NO. 95-16: • 1. The granting Variance No. 95-16 to permit no landscape area along Edwards Street in lieu of a five (5) foot wide area is not necessary to preserve the enjoyment of one or more . substantial property rights. The site can be fully developed at permitted densities and meet all provisions of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance while providing the landscape area. 2. There are no special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, that make the strict application of the zoning ordinance deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classification. The subject lot will be vacant after demolition of structures and is a generally regular shaped area. The project design incorporates fill that will level the site, therefore, topography is not an obstacle to incorporating the landscape area. FINDINGS OF APPROVAL- TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15071: 1. The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan, or other applicable provisions of this Code.- Tentative Tract Map No. 15071 for a 17 single family detached unit subdivision is consistent with the goals and policies of the Huntington Beach General Plan, including the Housing and Land Use Elements. 2. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of development. The site is relatively flat and physically suitable for the proposed density of six units per net acre. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time that the General Plan designation of Low Density Residential (7 units per acre), and Residential Low Density zoning were implemented. The size, depth, frontage, street width, and other design features of the proposed subdivision are in compliance with the standard plans and specifications on file with the City as well as in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and the supplemental City Subdivision Ordinance. The proposed single family residential subdivision is designed to integrate with the existing neighborhood with public streets and sidewalks. 3. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not cause serious health problems or substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Planning Commission or Zoning Administrator may approve such a tentative map if an environmental impact report was prepared with respect to the project and a finding was made that specific economic, social or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report. The environmental assessment for the project concludes that the project, with mitigation measures, will have a less than significant effect on the environment. 4. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision unless alternative easements, for access or for use, will be provided. The subdivision will provide all necessary easements and will not affect any existing easements. SUGGESTED CONDITAS OF APPROVAL- TENTATIVEACT MAP NO. 15071: 1. The tentative tract map received and dated November 15, 1995 shall be the approved layout with the following modifications: a. Revise map to show a three foot landscape easement along the easterly edge of the site, adjacent to Edwards Street, and a two foot landscaped area in the public right- of-way. 2. The following conditions are required to be completed prior to recordation of the final map unless otherwise stated. Bonding may be substituted for construction in accordance with provisions of the subdivision map act. (PW) a. The following shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach: 1. The water system and appurtenances. 2. The sewer system and appurtenances.. 3. The two foot public utility easement. 4. Three foot landscape easement adjacent to Edwards Street. 5. Sub-surface water rights. b. All streets shall be dedicated to the public. c. All vehicular access rights to Edwards Street shall be released and relinquished to the City of Huntington Beach. d. Any existing water service shall be abandoned, at the main, per Public Works Water Division specifications. e. Fire hydrant locations shall be approved by the Fire Department. f. Hydrology and hydraulic studies shall be submitted for Public Works review and approval and shall address the provisions of Chapter 222 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, including Section 222.IOC. g. A sewer study shall be submitted for Public Works approval. The developer shall design and construct the sewer system required to serve the development. h. The developer shall install new curb, gutter and sidewalk and retaining wall on Edwards Street, adjacent to the tract boundary, per Public Works requirements. i. The developer shall remove and replace the existing paving to centerline on Edwards Street, adjacent to the tract boundary, per Public Works requirements. A service life of 20 years shall be provided for. j. The proposed sidewalks on Madera Lane shall meet A.D.A. and Public Works Standards as depicted on the site plan. k. Underground all existing dry utilities along Edwards Street. 1. Signing, striping and street lighting shall be designed and constructed in accordance with Public Works Standards. m. Drainage flows from adjacent properties shall not be obstructed. Flows shall be accommodated per Public Works Standards. n. On-site drainage shall not be directed to adjacent properties, but shall be handled by a Public Works approved method. o. The engineer or surveyor preparing the final map shall tie the boundary of the map into the Horizontal Control System established by the County Surveyor in a manner described in Sections 7-9-330 and 7-9-337 of the Orange County Subdivision Code and Orange County Subdivision Manual, Subarticle 18. p. The engineer or surveyor preparing the final map shall submit to the County Surveyor a digital-graphics file of said map in a manner described in Sections 7-9-330 and 7-9- 337 of the Orange County Subdivision Code and Orange County Subdivision Manual, Subarticle 18. q. Lot 16 shall have a 10 ft. by 10 ft. corner cut-off providing site distance to lot 17. r. Lot 6 shall have a 10 ft. by 10 ft. corner cut-off providing site distance to lot 32 of Tract 5 60 1. The developer shall attempt to quitclaim the 10 ft. by 10 ft. area to said lot 32. Any re-construction necessary, such as block walls, landscaping, etc. shall be at the developers expense. 3. Prior to submittal of the final map for approval by the City Council, the following shall be required: a. An Affordable Housing Agreement Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Department. The plan shall provide for minimum 10 percent of the housing units (equal mix of two units) approved to be affordable to families of low and moderate income level (average 100% of Orange County median) for a period of thirty years. Said plan shall be executed prior to issuance of the first building permit for the tract. The affordable units shall be under construction, or available to the public, prior to final building permit approval (occupancy) of the first home. b. The developer shall meet with the appropriate school districts with the intent to mitigate the impact on school facilities. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15071: 1. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid prior to map recordation. (PW) 2. Park and Recreation Fees shall be paid prior to acceptance of the final map by City Council or at issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. 3. Tentative Tract Map 45071 and Conditional Use Permit Nole-72 shall become null and void unless exercised within two (2)years of the date of final approval. An extension of time may be granted by the Planning Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Division a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. 4. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of$25 for the posting of the Notice of Determination at the County of Orange Clerk's Office. The check shall be made out to the County of Orange and submitted to the Department of Community Development within two (2) days of the Planning Commission's action. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-72: 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated November 15, 1995 shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following modifications: a. Revise site plan to show a three foot landscape easement along the easterly edge of the site, adjacent to Edwards Street, and a two foot landscape area in the public right-of-way. b. Revise site plan to show decorative pavers in driveways of lots 10 and 12. 2. Prior to any demolition, grading or excavating activity, the following shall be completed: a. The applicant shall provide thirty days written notice to the City of Huntington Beach Historic Resources Board. The Board will document the structures and equipment on site. b. Any asbestos contained therein shall be identified and removed in compliance with City, State and Federal standards, including an asbestos abatement program to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and Building Official. c. A contingency plan shall be submitted for review and approval to the Huntington Beach Fire Department. The plan will identify procedures and contacts for instances when hazardous substances are encountered on-site. d. Any pesticides or other hazardous substances contained on the site or in the structures shall be identified and removed in compliance with City, State and Federal standards. e. The applicant shall submit a tract map to Orange County Vector Control one (1) month prior to grading activity and arrange an inspection of the site. The applicant shall comply with the rodent control plan recommended by Orange County Vector Control. A copy of the control plan shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development for inclusion in the entitlement file. 3. Prior to submittal for building permits, the following shall be completed: a. Names of streets shall be approved by the Huntington Beach Fire Department prior to use in accordance with City Specification No. 429. (FD) b. Submit three (3) copies of the site plan to the Planning Division for addressing purposes after street name approval by the Fire Department. c. Depict all utility apparatus, such as but not limited to back flow devices and Edison transforms, on the site plan. They shall be prohibited in the front and exterior yard setbacks unless properly screened by landscaping or other method as approved by the Community Development Director. d. Floor plans shall depict natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at the location of clothes dryers; natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units; and low-volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. e. If foil-type insulation is to be used, a fire retarding type shall be installed as approved by the Building Department and indicated on the floor plans. f. If outdoor lighting is included, high-pressure sodium vapor lamps or similar energy savings lamps shall be used. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties and shall be noted on the site plan and elevations. g. The site plan shall include (or reference page) all conditions of approval imposed on the project printed verbatim. Model numbers, lot numbers and street names shall be depicted on the site plan. 4. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the following shall be completed: a. Wall plans shall be submitted and approved by the Department of Community Development. Double walls shall be prohibited; prior to the construction of any new walls, a plan must be submitted identifying the removal of any existing walls next to the new wall, and shall include necessary homeowner's approval. b. A plan for silt control for all water runoff from the property during construction and initial operation of the project may be required if deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works. (PW) 5. Prior to issuance of building permits, the following shall be completed: a. Submit copy of the revised site plan, floor plans and elevations pursuant to Condition No. 1 for review and approval and inclusion in the entitlement file. In addition, the following information shall be noted on the plans: 1. Buildings on lots 10 and 12 shall have an automatic sprinkler system installed throughout to comply with Huntington Beach Fire Department and Uniform Building Code Standards. Shop drawings shall be submitted to and approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. A one inch water service is required for automatic sprinklers. (FD) 2. Two new fire hyrants shall be installed prior to combustoconstruction. Shop P p drawings shall be submitted to the Public Works Department and approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. (FD) 3. Address numbers will be installed to comply with City Specification No. 428.(FD) b. A grading plan, prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval (by issuance of a grading permit). (PW) c. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered engineer. This analysis shall include on-site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations for grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations, retaining walls, streets, and utilities. (PW) d. The applicant shall submit a site plan depicting the Model homes/sales office, and parking lot locations to the Department of Community Development for review and approval. e. The Final Map shall be accepted by the City Council, recorded with the Orange County Recorder and a copy filed with the Department of Community Development. f. Final design elevations of grading shall not vary from elevations shown on the tentative map by more than one (1) foot. (PW) g. A Street Improvement Plan, prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public Works Department. (PW) h. A Landscape Construction Set must be submitted to the Departments of Community Development and Public Works and must be approved. The Landscape Construction Set shall include a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State Licensed Landscape Architect which includes all proposed/existing plan materials (location, type, size, quantity), an irrigation plan, a grading plan, an approved site plan, and a copy of the entitlement conditions of approval. The landscape plans shall be in conformance with Chapter 231 of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. The set must be approved by both departments prior to issuance of building permits. (PW) i. An erosion control plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works. (PW) j. The developer shall submit a separate utility plan, showing water system improvements including service connections to each building, fire hydrant, valves, backflow devices and other appurtenances in accordance with applicable U.P.C., City Ordinances, Public Works Standards and Water Division design criteria. These plans shall be approved prior to any construction by the Public Works Water Division and the City of Huntington Beach Fire Department. (PW) k. Abandon the existing on-site water well per State codes. (PW) 1. Submit a letter of mgrevision from FEMA declaring the traOxempt from floodplain requirements or submit copy of completed FEMA Elevation Certificates for each unit. m. Submit a construction vehicle control plan to Department of Public Works for review and approval. n. An interim parking and/or building materials storage plan shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development to assure adequate parking is available for employees, customers, contractors, etc., during the project's construction phase. o. Installation or removal of underground flammable or combustible liquid storage tanks shall comply with Orange County Environmental Health and Huntington Beach Fire Department requirements. p. The placement and storage of the diesel tank(s) or any flammable substance shall be reviewed and approved by the Huntington Beach Fire Department prior to construction. 6. During construction, the applicant shall: a. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems in all areas where vehicles travel to keep damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site: b. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day; c. Use low sulfur fuel (.05%)by weight for construction equipment; d. Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days (first stage smog alerts); e. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts. 7. Prior to final building permit approval of the first single family unit, the following shall be completed: a. Pursuant to a landscape plan reviewed and approved by the Departments of Public Works and Community Development, the applicant shall replace the 18 inch (trunk size) Podacarpus at a 1:1 ratio, relocate (transplant) the 12 inch Windmill Palm and save the three Plumeria bushes (four inches each). All trees will replaced/relocated on site. b. If the tract is not considered exempt by FEMA, a second Elevation Certificate will be required for each unit "as built". c. All improvements (including landscaping)to the property shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans and conditions of approval specified herein.. d. Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein shall be accomplished. e. A reproducible myltopy of the recorded final map, along*a digital graphics file of the recorded map, shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works. (PW) f. The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District and submit a copy to Community Development Department. g. All building spoils, such a unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. 8. Construction shall be limited to 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM Monday - Friday and 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM on Saturday. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-72: 1. Traffic Impact Fees shall be paid at the time of final building inspection of the first unit. (PW) 2. A construction permit shall be required for all work within the public right-of-way. (PW) 3. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, Building Division, and Fire Department as well as applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards. 4. State-mandate school impact fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. 5. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Conditional Use Permit No. 95-72 and Variance No. 95-16, pursuant to a public hearing, if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance or Municipal Code occurs. * Mitigation Measure ... .......................ATTAC.... ....... ENT 3vn -. ,- Broa Ho BROADMOOR DOMES 5405*in Drrive,BSuite 200 Southwest, Inc. San Diego, California 92121 619.455.9454 Fax 619.455.7449 December 22, 1995 DEC 2 21995 Ms. Connie Brockway - City Clerk City of Huntington Beach P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 Re: Appeal of Approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 15071/Conditional Use Permit No. 95-72/Variance No. 95- 16/Negative Declaration No. 95-8. Dear Ms. Brockway: Broadmoor Homes Southwest, Inc. as applicant in the above referenced project is submitting for your action an appeal of the Planning Commissions decision. Our appeal is based upon the undue hardships to Broadmoor Homes that the city Fire Department will be creating because of the elimination of the through street access of Madera Street. We respectfully submit to you our appeal request. Please feel free to contact us at anytime if you have any questions or need any further information. Sincerely, Michael Chau Executive Vice President a cc: Mary Beth Broeren, Planning Dept. - -car" q u'1 � A Tradition of Excellence Since 1959 Huntington Beach Union H., �ol District . 9-12 Configuration Cost Estimates Per Square Foot of Building Area Site Statistics Statistic Adjustments Factor Description Acres 40.D0 Geographic 100:Orange Land Sq.Ft. 1,742,400 Small Building ' :< < . >'< >z ` :N1A No Students 2,400 Index Adjustmenf.;<:::.:;:,.;: ;:;,:;:::<;:;`<Lee Saylor Net Sq.Ft per Student 91 Urban _-.:.::.WA'No Gross Sq.Ft.per Student 94 Security N/A No Net Building Sq.Ft. 218,400 Base Fixed Fee Building Costs $95.74 Gross Building Sq.Ft. 225,600. Structures-Sto 1 Cost Inflator 100.00% Building Class D Category Factors Unit Cost Per Total Costs Total Cost Per Total Sq.FL Student :Hard Costs rsa: r>:< Building Costs Fixed 395.74 $20,909,39E 58,712.25 Adjustments Lee Saylor $0.D0 $0 S0.00 On-Site Development-General 5.00% Of Building.Costs S4.79 $1,045,470 $435.61 On-Site Development-General $7,500 Per Acre $1.37 $300,000 S125.00 On-She Development-Serices 7.50% Of 9ui!dinc Crs's VIE S1,568,205 $65_1.42 Utility Services 2.50% Of Building Costs $2.39 $522.735 $217.81 Off-Site Improvements 10.00% Of Building Ces;s S9.57 $2,090,940 $871.22 Eneroy Management 3.D0% Of 5u 6-.c Costs $2.87 $627,282 $261.37 Other Hard Costs 1.00% Of Buildin_Costs 30.95 $209,094 S87.12 Hard Cost Sub-Total Soft $124.8E $27,273,723 $11,363.80 COsis .... ..... ..: ..... . .- . F ArchJEng.Fees i.5096 Of Hard Costs, $9.37 $2,045,484 $852.29 Inpection/Tests 2.50% Of Hard Costs S2.12 $681,828 $284.10 Plan Check Fees 0.75% Of Hard Costs $0.94 $2D4,548 $85.23 Utility Fees 025% Of Hard Costs $0.31 $68,183 $28.41 Environmental Documentation $30,0D0 Per Site $0.14 $30,0D0 $12.50 Archeaological Survey $5,0D0 Per Site $0.02 S5,000 $2.08 Soils Report $20,D00 Fer She $0.09 S20?,000 $8.33 She Survey $7,500 Per Site $0.03 $7,500 $3.13 Appraisal&Escrow Costs $50,000 Per Site $0.23 $50,000 $20.83 Administrative Costs 3.00% Of Hard Costs $3.75 3818,194 $340.91 -Relocation Costs $0 Per Site $0.00 $0 $0:00 Other Soft Costs 0.15% Of Hard Ccs;s $0.19 S40,910 $17.05 Sot Cost Sub-Tofai $i 8.19 S3,971,647 $1.654.85 :Fr&E.B.Technology :...;.....:.::::, -:::::.- Fumiture&Equipment FF&E1 t. i ........:.:......:..:......:-:.i67. >:;:•:.:::..:.:..:......... ....:-::: ( $7.00 Per Bldg.S.; F �7 00 $1,528,800 5637.00 Technology&Media S14.00 Per Bldg.Sq.Ft. $14.00 $3,057,600 $1,274.00 FF&E&-Technology Sub-Total $21.00 $4,586,400 $1.911.00 Hard/Soft&FF&E Cost Sub-Total $164.06 $35,831,170 $14,929.65 CbristrucLon Conti ;::::::::;:•;;:>::;•::::..::•:. ::::; .%....... . .. :.:..:. :.::::::::...::....:::.::. .. n ency . :::.s:::::•'.: State Contingency 1.500A Of Sub-Total $2.46 =7,468 State Contingency $2,000 Per School $0.01 $2,000 $0.83 District Contingency 3.50% Of Sub-l Otal S5.74 S1,254,091 S-522.54 Construct)on Condngency Sub-Total $8.21 $1,793,558 S747.32 Hard/Soft,FF&E,&Contingency Sub-Total $172.27 $37,624,728 $15,676.97 $37,624,729 and ,. :,......... Land $720,000 Per Acre $131.87 $28,80Q000 512,000.00 Land Cost Sub-Total S131.87 $28,800,000 $72,000.00 :.....:.:,.....:.:,. :.::...:..:,. Land Contingency State Contingency ,-:;.:::::<.:<,•:;: :.: 9 y 1.50% Of Sub-Total S1.98 $432,000 S180.00 State Contingency $2,000 Per School S0.01 $2,0D0 $0.83 District Contingency 3.50% Of Sub-Total $4.62 $1,008,0D0 $420.00 Land Contingency Sub-Total $6.60 $1,442,000 $600.83 Land&Contingency Sub-Total - $138.47 $30,242,000 $12,600.83 $30.242,000 Total Construction/Land Cost per Sq.Ft. $310.76 $67,866,728 $28,277.80 $67,866.725 Interim&Support Facilities 6. ..... . ... .. . Interim Facilities $0 Per 30 Students $0.00 SO $0.00 Support Facilities $0.00 Per Net Sq. Ft. $0.00 $0 $0.00 lnteHum&Support FacLii6es Sub-rotal S0.00 $0 $0-00. GRAND TOTAL COST PER SO. FT. $310.75 $67,866,728 $ 8,277.80 \ Source:Community Sysle m• A..oc..r.,s, Inc. - ITEM B-1 ADDENDUM ADDITIONAL SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-72 SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- CONDMONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-72: Lb. Revise site plan to show decorative pavers in driveways of lots 10 and 12. 2.e. The applicant shall submit a tract map to Orange County Vector Control one (1) month prior to grading activity and arrange an inspection of the site. The applicant shall comply with the rodent control plan recommended by Orange County Vector Control. A copy of the control plan shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development for inclusion in the entitlement file. (KL438) ....... ATTA................................................................................................................................... CHME .............-...........%........V..%........%........................'............'........................'......:....%................. N ............................................... T ° `-................-.......... .......................... .. :..::::..••••�':.�..::j.:::::.......::i + +i :::i: ._:._:::':..:.�.:ii:•:.. ...$jiffy;;i'::' +:::i ii::'i.':�:i"f.:•4:i•iy:?:•::i }:::ii::v�:i�!fv:::::i::i:iiiil..}}:��y:{:ijjj}..�':!•:..,�.;�.!�;�.�� :i:::::::::;:}j:(:;::;:;:i:::v?::::•:::•::::{::::::}:j:Xy,{:}:i{}i:;:i::''f.:;:: ... .... .. .. .. .. .•Z .... ........ ............ .......................... 1. PROJECT TITLE: MUKAI SUBDIVISION Concurrent Entitlements: Tentative Tract No. 15071/Conditional Use Permit No. 95-72/Variance No. 95-16 2. LEAD AGENCY: City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Contact: Mary Beth Broeren,Assistant Planner Phone: (714) 536-5271 S. PROJECT LOCATION: 1730.1 Edwards Street (600 feet north of Slater Avenue on the west side) 4. PROJECT PROPONENT: Broadmoor Homes Southwest, Inc. Contact: Michael Chau Phone: (619) 455-9454 5 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: RLD (Residential"Low Density)- 6. ZONING: RL-FP2 (Low Density Residential - Floodplain) 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: To permit the subdivision of approximately 3.7 acres into 17 lots. The project includes construction of 17 one and two-story detached single family units. The proposed tract will gain access from a to-be-constructed extension of Madera Lane. OTHER AGENCIES WHOSE APPROVAL IS REQUIRED (AND PERMITS NEEDED): None. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a"Potentially Significant Impact" or is"Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated," as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Land Use&Planning ❑ Transportation/Circulation ❑ Public Services ❑ Population &Housing ❑x Biological Resources ❑ Utilities & Service Systems ❑ Geological Problems ❑ Energy&Mineral Resources ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Water Hazards Cultural Resources ❑ Air Quality ❑ Noise ❑ Recreation ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑` I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment; there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described-on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY a significant effect(s)on the environment,but at least one effect(1)has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and(2)has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a"potentially significant impact"or is"potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effect that remain to be addressed. Si tore Date Psi oort4 'til� Printed Name Tide EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except"No Impact"answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A"No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to the project. A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards. 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved. Answers should address off-site as well as on-site,cumulative as well as project-level,indirect as well as direct,and construction as well as operational impacts. 3. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate,if an effect is significant or potentially significant, or if the lead agency lacks information to make a finding of insignificance. If there are one or. more "Potentially Significant Impact"entries when the determination is made,preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is warranted: 4. Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact"to a "Less than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures,and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII,"Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced). 5. Earlier analyses may be used where,pursuant to the tiering,program EIR,or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration.. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analyses are discussed in Section XVII at the end of the checklist. 6. References to information sources for potential impacts (e.g.,general plans,zoning ordinances) have been incorporated into the checklist. A source list has been provided in Section XVII. Other sources used or individuals contacted have been cited in the respective discussions. 7. The following checklist has been formatted after Appendix I of Chapter 3,Title 14,California Code of Regulations,but has been augmented to reflect the City of Huntington Beach's requirements. (Note: Standard Conditions of Approval-The City imposes standard conditions of approval on projects which are considered to be components of or modifications to the project,some of these standard conditions also result in reducing or minimizing environmental impacts to a level of insignificance. However,because they are considered part of the project,they have not been identified as mitigation measures. For the.-readers' information,a list of applicable standard conditions identified in the discussions has been provided as Attachment No. 3. SAMPLE QUESTION.- Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES(and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: Landslides orMudflows? (Sources: 1, 6) Q Q Q Discussion: The attached source list explains that 1 is the Huntington Beach General Plan and 6 is a topographical map of the area which show that the area is located in a flat area. (Note: This response probably would not require further explanation). :'ally Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact L LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the Proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑x (Sources:3,4) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? (Sources: 3) c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑X (Sources: 1) d) Affect agricultural resources or operations(e.g., impacts to ❑ ❑ ❑ XQ soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible uses)? (Sources: 3) e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established ❑ ❑ ❑ 19 community(including a low-income or minority community)? (Sources: 1, 2. 3) Discussion: The project site is a former nursery with five greenhouses. There is also a single family residence(consisting of two buildings); a garage and a barn on the property. The nursery is no longer operational and the residential unit is vacant. The proposed project will consist of 17 detached single family units. The project is consistent with the Residential Low Density General Plan land use designation and the Low Density Residential zoning designation for the subject site. The density of the proposed project is 4.6 units per acre:the zoning designation allows up to 7.0 units per acre. The project is also compatible with the surrounding area. As shown on the attached vicinity map,the surrounding area is developed with single family residential uses with comparable lot dimensions. The project does not conflict with enN ironmental plans or policies of the City of Huntington Beach. There are no agricultural resources or active operations in the vicinity that would be affected by the project. Although formerly used as a nursery,the project site has not been identified by the California Department of Food and Agriculture as prime farmland; therefore,development of the site is not expected to have an effect on agricultural resources in the city. As shown on the attached site plan. the project also does not propose any elements that would disrupt or di-vide the physical arrangement of the surrounding community. II.- POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population ❑ ❑ ❑ 9- projections? (Sources: 3, 5) b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ indirectly(e.g.,through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? (Sources: 3, 5) c) Displace existing housing,especially affordable housing? ❑ ❑ Q ❑ (Sources: 6) Discussion: The project will introduce 17 new homes into the area and approximately 45 occupants. The net increase in units is 16 as there is an existing unit on the property that will likely be demolished. The population increase resulting from Environmental Assessment 495-8 1 of 14 10/26/95 • P tially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources). Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact the project is consistent with growth projections in the City of Huntington Beach General Plan and regional projections and represents less than 0.1 percent of the city's current population. The existing unit on the property has been vacant for 15 to 20 years. It is in dilapidated condition and would require substantial rehabilitation to be suitable for habitation. (The unit will be documented by the Historic Resources Board,however,prior to demolition. See discussion under item XIV.) It is a City policy to recommend that 10 percent of the units of a development project be provided and available as affordable housing. This is the equivalent of two units for the proposed project. A plan outlining the above shall be recommended as a condition of approval. No significant adverse impacts are anticipated. III.GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture?(Sources: 4) ❑ El 11 0 b) Seismic ground shaking? (Sources: 7) Q EYE]' Q c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? (Sources: 7, 0Q 0 8, 9) d) Seiche,tsunami, or volcanic hazard? (Sources: 7, 9) C1Q Q' D_ e) Landslides or Mudflows? (Sources: 7) El ❑ 13 Q f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions El El 0 El from excavation, grading, or fill? (Sources: 8, 10) g) Subsidence of the land? (Sources: 9) 13 El. h) Expansive soils? (Sources: 8) Q 0 9. 0_ . i) Unique geologic or physical features? (Sources: 8) Discussion: The project site currently consists of a former nursery operation,includinj greenhouses and planting area,and has never been graded or substantially developed. Implementation of the proposed project will require 100 percent of the site to be graded. The volume of cutting will be approximately 4,000 cubic yards;the fill will be 5,000 cubic yards. The import of 1,000 cubic yards will be via an approved haul route. The proposed grading will consist of cuts and fills less than five feet thick. The maximum planned fill will be approximately 4.5 feet. The,thicker areas of fill,three feet or greater, are planned for the eastern edge of the site,along Edwards Street,and settlement thereof should not impact the residential units. The majority of the site will have one to two feet of fill. The geotechnical report for the project concludes that most of the settlement in this area will occur during construction and.that long term settlement will have minimal impact due to standard residential foundation construction, including post-tensioned slabs. Displacement,compaction, and overcovering of soil associated with construction of the infrastructure improvements and single family units is considered negligible. The project site is not located within the Alquist-Priolo Special Hazards Zone but is located within one mile of the Newport- Inglewood Fault. In the event of an earthquake in the Huntington Beach-area,there may be ground shaking. Structures built in California are required to comply with standards set forth in the Uniform Building Code established to minimize impacts to structures from ground shaking. (See standard condition No. 1 in Attachment No. 3 requiring compliance with Environmental Assessment #95-8 2 of 14 10/26/95 • Po ally Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact all local and State codes.) Currently,the site has ground water depths of approximately 30 feet, minimizing the . opportunities for liquefaction. Ground water levels in the area vary from 10 to 20 feet;however, and historical records for the site show ground water depths as shallow as five to 10 feet below surface. Four borings of the site show that soils are generally loose within eight feet of the surface and there is fine sand present,two other indicators of liquefaction potential. These soil conditions are countered by the other soil deposits which predominantly consist of gravelly clay, silty sand,and medium sand that are not conducive to liquefaction. Authors of the geotechnical report conclude that based on these factors, the site has low to moderate liquefaction potential. Foundation design will incorporate post-tensioned slabs to minimize any potential impacts. The site is located in an area in which expansive soils are generally present, and geotechnical investigation of the site showed that the soils are expected to have low to moderate expansion potential. In addition, the geotechnical report found that there would be low to moderate compressibility. The report did not find any constraints at the project site which would preclude the proposed development and indicated that any soils impacts can be mitigated by soils studies required by standard conditions of approval and the structural recommendations generally contained therein. .(See standard condition No. 2.) No significant impacts are anticipated. The project will result in minor alteration of topography..Some of this alteration may be required because the subject site is located in the floodplain(see discussion under Section IV). The project Will be subject to standard conditions of approval (see No. 3 in Attachment No. 3.)which require submittal of hydrology and hydraulic studies to determine that development of the site will not adversely impact adjacent properties or exceed the capacity of drainage systems. Due to the relatively high elevation of the site and its distance from the coast,the site is expected to have low tsunami hazard. Land subsidence is also not anticipated to have a significant impact even though a water well has been in use on the site since 1963. The well will be abandoned for the proposed project. Site preparation and the one to two construction phases may result in short term wind and water erosion impacts. The project will be subject to standard conditions of approval requiring implementation of dust control measures and submittal of a siltation plan. (See standard conditions No. 4 and 5.) The site does not contain any unique geologic or physical features. - IV.WATER Would the proposal result in: . a) Changes in absorption rates,drainage patterns, or the rate 0 0 Q- and amount of surface runoff? (Sources: 2)- b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such ❑ El as flooding? (Sources: 10) c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface El ❑ ET 91 water quality(e.g.,temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? (Sources: 1) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? ❑' El El IR (Sources: l) e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water ❑ 0 movement? (Sources: 1) f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through . direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? (Sources: 3) Environmental Assessment #95-8 3 of 14 10/26/95 4 • Pally Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? (Sources: ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ 8) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? (Sources: 8) 0 El i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater 11 ❑ 0 ❑. otherwise available for public water supplies? (Sources: 5. 7) Discussion:. Buildout of the property under the proposed conceptual plan Aril] increase the amount of impervious surfaces (concrete, asphalt, etc.). Approximately 60 percent of the site«ZIl be covered with paving or structures. New impervious surfaces as well as construction related activities that require grading and vegetation removal Aril! increase the amount of storm water runoff. The project will be subject to standard conditions of approval requiring submittal of grading plans and hydrology and hydraulic studies for review and approval by the Public Works Department to determine that the runoff generated by the proposed project will not adversely impact existing drainage systems and adjacent properties. (See standard condition No. 3.) Curb and gutter will be constructed to tie into the City's existing storm drain system. The proposed project is located within Zone AO DO of the floodpWn of the Santa Ana River and will be subject to Federal Flood Insurance requirements. The two existing single family home tracts(Tracts 5590 and 5601) surrounding the project site have been considered exempt from the flood insurance requirements because of their elevations; it is anticipated that this will be the case for the proposed project. The applicant will be required to provide elevation certificates for all new units or submit a letter of map revision to the Federal Emergency Management Agency to obtain the exempt status for the proposed tract. (See standard condition of approval No. 6.) The project may also alter the course of flood flows in the area. As noted, a hydrology study will be required to insure that the proposed project will not have a significantly adverse impact on flood flows on adjacent properties. The project will require the installation of new on-site water lines. Because the proposed 17 unit project complies with the Residential Low Density land use designation established by the General Plan for the site,the estimated water demand of 6,358 gallons-per day for the proposed project can be accommodated by the City's water service capacit, and does not represent a significant demand. The project will also alter water usage on the site with the abandonment of the existing water well. The project will be subject to standard conditions of approval requiring implementation of Title 24 conservation measures such as low flow fixtures and use of drought tolerant plant species and drip irrigation. (See condition No. 1 of the standard conditions.) The site does not drain directly into any natural body of water. No significant adverse impacts to the existing water supply are anticipated. V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing Q 13 9 or projected air quality violation? (Sources: 11) b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? (Sources: 1) El El 11 c) Alter air movement, moisture,or temperature? (Sources: 6) El d) Create objectionable odors? (Sources: 6) Environmental Assessment #95-8 4 of 14 10/26/95 Aally Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact Discussion: At end of project buildout,there will be an additional 140-170 average vehicle trips per day. This will result in an increase in-vehicle-related emissions in the area which may incrementally contribute to degradation of local air quality. Because the scale of the project is 90 percent below the threshold criteria established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District for potentially significant air quality impacts,its contribution is minor in nature. Short-term deterioration of local ambient air quality may occur during construction as a result of construction equipment emissions and dust. Emissions are expected from gasoline and diesel-powered grading and paving equipment and fugitive dust generation associated with earth moving activities. Grading activities are expected to last approximately.30 days. With the implementation of conditions of approval minimizing dust and emissions resulting from construction equipment, no significant adverse air quality impacts are anticipated. See standard condition No. 5. VI.TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? (Sources: 6, 12) Q 0 b) Hazards to safety from design features(e.g., sharp curves or El Q Q- El dangerous intersections)or incompatible uses(e.g.,farm equipment)? (Sources: 2) c) Inadequate emergency access or inadequate access to nearby Q 11 Q uses? (Sources: 1, 2) d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? (Sources: 2, 4) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? (Sources: 2) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative ❑ transportation(e.g.,bus turnouts,bicycle racks)? (Sources: 2) g) Rail,waterborne or air traffic impacts? (Sources: 1) El 0 D 0 Discussion: The 17 units are projected to result in approximately 140-170 average vehicle trips per day at completion. Existing roadway segments in the area are currently operating at a level of service(LOS)of B or better(Warner Avenue from Springdale Street to Edwards Street-LOS A; Warner Avenue from Edwards Street to Goldenwest Street-LOS B; Slater Avenue from Springdale Street to Goldenwest Street-LOS A; Springdale Street from Slater Avenue to Warner Avenue-LOS A). Signalized intersections in the same vicinity also have an LOS B or better. Traffic generation associated with the project constitutes less than one percent of the existing traffic levels in the vicinity and is projected to have a negligible impact to levels of service in the area. Construction traffic resulting from development of the project may result in short-term interruptions to traffic circulation, including pedestrian and bicycle flow. These potential impacts may be reduced through implementation of conditions of approval requiring Department of Public Works approval of a construction vehicle control plan. See standard condition No. 7. - Environmental Assessment 495-8 5 of 14 10/26/95 Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant IS SUES.(and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact The project would extend Madera Lane thereby providing through access to two currently dead-end segments of this street. This will improve overall circulation for existing residents of Madera Lane. The project also proposes to construct a cul-de- sac perpendicular to the Madera Lane extension. Access to the subdivision will be from Madera Lane off of Athena Drive to the north and Santa Ynez Drive to the south. Parking for the subdivision will be provided independently on each lot,with three car garages. Based on discussions with the City's Department of Public Works,traffic and circulation impacts resulting from the project are not considered significant. With implementation of standard conditions of approval,including conformance of the proposed street systems to City standards,review and approval of street improvement plans and payment of traffic impact fees, no significant traffic impacts are anticipated. VU.BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats ❑ El 0 9 (including but not limited to: plants,fish, insects, animals, and birds)? (Sources: 13) b) Locally designated species(e.g., heritage trees)? (Sources: El 0 El Q 13) c) Locally designated natural communities(e.g.,oak forest; coastal habitat. etc.)? (Sources: 13) d) Wetland habitat(e.g., marsh. riparian and vernal pool)? D 0 0. (Sources: 13) e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? (Sources: 7) ❑ El El 9 Discussion: The site contains numerous trees and palms and other landscaping elements such as shrubs and bushes. All of these are proposed for removal as a result of the project. The species include fruit trees such as Persimmon and Apricot and other species such as Podocarpus, Avocado,Yucca,Laurel Bay and Ginko. The City's Park,Tree and Landscape Division has determined that none of the species is rare or endangered,and only a few of the species is mature and healthy enough to warrant relocation or replacement. With the recommended mitigation measure listed below, no significant impacts to plant life are anticipated. Specifically,it is recommended that the Podacarpus be replaced at a 1:1 ratio, the Windmill Palm be relocated and the three Plumerias be saved. The project also will be required to comply with City standards for landscaping; these requirements include the provision of 40 percent of the front yard setback area as landscaping and a minimum of one tree in the front yard setback area of each lot. The project site is periodically utilized by a variety of animal.species including domestic dogs and cats, squirrels and various bird species. The proposed project will not result in any loss to endangered or sensitive animal or bird species. No significant impacts are anticipated. Mitigation: 1. Pursuant to a landscape plan reviewed and approved by the Departments of Public Works and Community Development, the applicant shall replace the 18 inch Podacarpus at a 1:1 ratio, relocate(transplant)the 12 inch Windmill Palm and save the three Plumeria bushes(four inches each). All trees will replaced/relocated on site. Environmental Assessment #95-8 6 of 14 10/26/95 Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact VIII.ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? (Sources: El El El 9 3) b) Use non-renewable resource in a wasteful and inefficient 11 El Q El manner? (Sources: 3, 7) c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource 0 that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? (Sources: 8) Discussion: The project will result in increases of fuel/energ} usage in the City;however,anticipated energy demands created by the project are within parameters of overall projected demand which is planning to be met for the area. Existing Southern California Gas Company facilities are adequate to accommodate the development. No significant adverse impacts to natural resources are anticipated. IX.IIAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances(including,but not limited to: oil,pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? (Sources: 7, 8) b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or Q E Q- 1' emergency evacuation plan? (Sources: 7) c) The creation of any health hazard or potential hazards? Q (Sources: 6, 8) d) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, 0 ❑ or trees? (Sources: 2, 13) Discussion: The proposed subdivision and construction of the single family residences and infrastructure improvements will not involve the use of any hazardous materials and will not result in any impediments to emergency response or evacuation plans. Grading and excavation of the project site will result in the storage of diesel fuel in a small tank on-site during that phase of the project. The project will also include the demolition of the greenhouses and other structures on the site,which may contain asbestos or pesticides. Additionally, grading activities and excavation of underground structures,including a concrete box, a septic system and water and gas pipes, may result in the exposure of individuals to potentially hazardous substances. With implementation of recommended mitigation measures, no significant impacts resulting from hazardous materials are anticipated. Completion of the project will also minimize fire hazards resulting from overgrown brush and vacant buildings. Mitigation: 1. The placement and storage of the diesel tank(s)or any flammable substance shall be reviewed and approved by the Huntington Beach Fire Department prior to construction. Environmental Assessment #95-8 7 of 14 10/26/95 Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact 2. Prior to demolition or excavation of structures,any asbestos contained therein shall be identified and removed in compliance with City, State and Federal standards,including an asbestos abatement program to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and Building Official. 3. A contingency plan shall be submitted for review and approval to the Huntington Beach Fire Department prior to any grading,excavation or demolition activity on the site. The plan will identify procedures and contacts for instances when hazardous substances are encountered on-site. 3. Prior to grading or demolition or excavation of structures,any pesticides or other hazardous substances contained on the site or in the structures shall be identified and removed in compliance with City, State and Federal standards. X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? (Sources: i. 14) 0 El b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? (Sources: i, 14) Q ❑ Discussion: The project will generate short-term noise impacts during construction with the use of heavy construction equipment. All construction will be required to comply with Chapter 8.40 Noise of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code, and through the implementation and compliance of standard conditions of approval;no significant noise impacts during construction are anticipated. Long-term noise impacts may occur as a result of the increase in trip-ends and associated vehicular noise generated by the new units. In addition,there will be additional noise impacts due to the increase in the number of units on the property. Due to the low level of traffic generated by the project and the ambient noise from the existing uses,the noise levels generated by the project are considered negligible. Five of the proposed units will be located along Edwards Street. Although noise projections do not show that these units will be located in 60 or greater CNEL noise contour levels;the units may be exposed to greater noise levels from vehicular traffic than those allowed for residences by the Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance. The project will be required to comply with State requirements pertaining to noise attenuation such that interior noise levels do not exceed 45 db in any habitable room. This may be achieved by the installation of double-paned windows,an air-conditioning system, or other method or any combination thereof. No significant impacts are anticipated. XI.PUBLIC SERVICES.- Would the proposal have an effect upon,or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? (Sources: Huntington Beach Fire Dept.) ❑ ❑ b) Police Protection? (Sources: Huntington Beach Police Dept.) El El c) Schools? (Sources: 15) ❑ ❑ 19 d) Maintenance of public facilities,including roads? (Sources: City of Huntington Beach) 0 11 Environmental Assessment 495-8 8 of 14 10/26/95 —, Sally Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact e) Other governmental services? (Sources: City of Huntington El 0 El Beach) Discussion: The proposed project has initially been reviewed by the various City Departments,including Public Works,Fire and Police,for compliance with all applicable City codes. With the implementation of standard conditions of approval,and compliance with City specifications,no significant adverse impacts to public services are anticipated. The site is located in the Ocean View School District and the Huntington Beach Union High School District. Facilities.in both districts are under capacity. The project will generate approximately 10 students,according to student generation rates for local school districts. In itself,the project will not require construction of school facilities but, on a cumulative basis,will contribute to overcrowding and the need for additional facilities. The developer will be required to pay State-mandated school impact fees to defray capital costs for these facilities. MUTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? (Sources: 5. 7) El. El ® Q b) Communication systems? (Sources: 5, 7) El El Q 0. c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? �` Q (Sources: 5. 7) d) Sewer or septic tanks? (Sources: 5,7) Q ❑ E- 0• e) Storm water drainage? (Sources: 5, 7) ❑ Q f) Solid waste disposal? (Sources: 5, 7) ❑ El 0 g) Local or regional water supplies? (Sources: 5,7) Discussion: The project will require incremental extensions of public services and utilities to the site,which will.be provided by the respective governmental agencies and utility companies. Water utilized by the development would be approximately 6,358 gallons per day. The project will also generate an estimated 4,335 gallons of sewage per day and 255 pounds of solid waster per day. The latter will be collected by the Rainbow Disposal Company. The scope of the project was reviewed by the Department of Public Works. With the implementation of standard conditions of approval, no adverse .impacts to the City's utilities are anticipated. These connections are considered as minor improvements,and existing systems can accommodate the projected use. XM.AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? (Sources: 1) ❑ 0 Environmental Assessment #95-8 9 of 14 10/26/95 • Po9ally Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? (Sources: 1, ❑ Q 4) c) Create light or'glare? (Sources: 2) ❑ Discussion: The project will remove the existing greenhouses and other structures on the site,most of which are in a dilapidated condition. The proposed residential units are consistent with zoning and will be compatible-with the surrounding residences; each lot will also be landscaped pursuant to City standards. The applicant has proposed both single and two story homes to reflect and insure compatibility with existing units in the immediate vicinity. The proposed tract will also be required to comply with the.residential infill lot ordinance,further assuring compatibility with existing single family residential properties adjacent to the project site. The site is not located along any scenic highway or in the vicinity of any scenic vista or resource. The project will improve aesthetics along Edwards Street by a condition of approval to underground existing utility lines. However,the applicant has requested a variance to not provide a five foot wide landscape easement along Edwards Street. The landscape planter is also not provided along Edwards Street for the tracts to the north, south and east. There are, however, street trees located along Edwards Street. The project will introduce some new light sources on the project site,including street and residential lighting. These are the same type of lighting sources which presently exist in the area. The incremental increase in ambient light due to the contribution of the 17 unit tract is expected to the negligible. With implementation of standard conditions of approval (See No. 8 on Attachment No. 3)requiring the directing of lights in a manner to prevent spillage onto adjacent properties, no adverse impacts are anticipated. XIV.CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? (Sources: 8) ElQ ❑ a b) Disturb archaeological resources? (Sources: 16) 11 El G- Q- c) Affect historical resources? (Sources: 17, 18) QEl d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would ❑ 0 0 affect unique ethnic cultural values? (Sources: 2) e) . Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential El El 0 1 impact area? (Sources: 1) Discussion: The project site is not located within the City's historic district or in the vicinity of any identified archaeological sites or cultural resources. There are several structures on the property that are over 40 years old,as well as various pieces of equipment used in conjunction with nursery/agricultural operations. The structures.and equipment are in disrepair. The Historic Resources Board reviewed the site to make a determination as to whether any-of the structures or equipment is of historical or cultural value. The Board's ad hoc committee concluded that an attempt should be made to save some of the equipment,and that prior to any demolition activity,the structures and equipment should be documented by the Historic Resources Board. This recommendation is shown below as a mitigation measure to minimize the impacts of the loss and/or relocation of these historical resources. The Board will also contact the property owner to determine if he would be willing to donate the equipment and will try to find a new display or storage location for the equipment. Environmental Assessment #95-8 10 of 14 10/26/95 • Pally Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact Mitigation: 1. The applicant shall provide thirty days written notice to the City of Huntington Beach Historic Resources Board prior to the issuance of any demolition permits or grading or excavating activity informing them of such activity. The Board will document the structures and equipment on site. XV.RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or El ❑X other recreational facilities? (Sources: 1, 2) b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? (Sources: 1) El El El 0 Discussion: The project will not result in the loss of existing recreational facilities. The project will be subject to payment of park and recreation fees to contribute toward the projects' share of park facilities in the city which will offset the project's cumulative recreation impacts. Environmental Assessment #95-8 11 of 14 10/26/95 • ��ally Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact XVLMANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? (Sources: 2, 7) Discussion: The project represents a minor increase in residential units and residents and will not significantly degrade the quality of the environment. It is not located in the areas of any«zldlife or biological resource areas and will therefore not substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below.self-sustaining levels,threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, or reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal. Existing structures on the site do not constitute important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory but are representative of the agricultural industry in the City of Huntington Beach. These structures and the associated equipment will be documented by the Historic Resources Board. No significant adverse impacts are anticipated. b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term,to ® El 0. 9_ the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals? (Sources: 3) Discussion: The proposed project is consistent with the City of Huntington Beach General Plan. It does not represent a significant negative impact to the emdronment or goals of the City. c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, 0 E Q' Q but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) (Sources: 3) Discussion: See discussion of items no. I-XV above. d) Does the project have emironmental effects which will cause El El I 1 9 substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? (Sources: 2,6) Discussion: See discussion of items no. I-XV above. Environmental Assessment #95-8 12 of 14 10/26/95 XVII. EARLIER ANALYSIS Earlier analyses may be used where,pursuant to tiering,program EIR,or other CEQA process,one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063 (c)(3)(D). Earlier Documents Prepared and Utilized in this Analysis Reference# Document Title Available for Review at: 1 Project Vicinity Map See Attachment#1 2 Reduced Site Plan See Attachment#2 3 City of Huntington Beach General Plan City of Huntington Beach Community Development Dept.,Planning/Zoning Information Counter,3rd Floor 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach 4 City of Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision " Ordinance 5 City of Huntington Beach Draft Environmental Impact Report for General Plan Update 6 Project Narrative " 7 City of Huntington Beach General Plan Technical " Background Report for General Plan Update 8 Geotechnical Investigation and Grading Plan Review for Tentative Tract 15071 9 Geotechnical Inputs " for City of Huntington Beach 10 FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (November 3, 1993) 1 I Air Quality Handbook, South Coast Air Quality " Management District 12 Trip Generation, 4th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers 13 Plant/Vegetation Site Plan for 17301 Edwards Street " 14 City of Huntington Beach Municipal Code City of Huntington Beach City Clerk Office,2nd Floor 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach Environmental Assessment#95-8 13 of 14 10/26/95 Reference # Document Title Available for Review at: 15 City of Huntington Beach City of Huntington Beach Community CEQA Procedures Handbook Development Dept.,Planning/Zoning Information Counter,3rd Floor 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach 16 City of Huntington Beach Archaeological Site Vicinity " Map 17 City of Huntington Beach Historic District Location " Map 18 , City of Huntington Beach Historic Resources Board " Recommendation Environmental Assessment #95-8 14 of 14 10/26/95 XV'III. Summary of Mitigation Measures Description of Impact Mitigation Measure The site contains numerous Pursuant to a landscape plan reviewed and approved by the Departments of Public Works and mature trees and palms and Community Development,the applicant shall replace the 18 inch Podacarpus at a 1:1 ratio, other landscaping elements such relocate(transplant)the 12 inch Windmill Palm and save the three Plumeria bushes(four inches as shrubs and bushes. All of each). All trees will replaced/relocated on site. these are proposed for removal as a result of the project. Excavation of the project site The placement and storage of the diesel tank(s)or any flammable substance shall be reviewed will result in the storage of and approved by the Huntington Beach Fire Department prior to construction. diesel fuel in a small tank on- site during that phase of the project. The project will include the Prior to demolition or excavation of structures, any asbestos contained therein shall be identified demolition of the greenhouses and removed in compliance with City, State and Federal standards, including an asbestos and other structures on the site, abatement program to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and Building Official. which may contain asbestos or esticides Demolition, grading activities A contingency plan shall be submitted for review and approval to the Huntington-Beach Fire and excavation of underground Department prior to any grading, excavation or demolition activity on the site. The plan will structures may result in the identify procedures and contacts for instances when hazardous substances are encountered on- exposure of individuals to site. potentially hazardous substances. The project will include the Prior to grading or demolition or excavation of structures,any pesticides or other hazardous demolition of the greenhouses substances contained on the site or in the structures shall be identified and removed in and other structures on the site, compliance with City, State and Federal`standards. which may-contain asbestos or pesticides. Additionally, grading activities and excavation of underground structures may result in the exposure of individuals to potentially hazardous substances There are several structures on The applicant shall provide thirty days written notice to the City of Huntington Beach Historic the property-that are over 40 Resources Board.prior to the issuance of any demolition permits or grading or excavating activity years old,as well as various informing them of such activity. The Board will document the structures and equipment on site. pieces of equipment of historical value. Environmental Assessment #95-8 15 of 14 10/26/95 � ..i.. N. I SPRINGDALE S T. I O �x WED y ,nl[ [ w`.` 1J�J_l.J_L.JS [" — A b IMV w s r Qr 6 Co[[f L. _ _[ SAIn ; NtMaLl C. 1_��� 7— — _ ._ _ -- _ —_�[fcer. _ p a„ Z — • __ A M _ _ __ °�- — �[I1111--••��11111 _ ,t A CA - mlw[r lN. — — v _ - - _ ��_Cf _ _ _- _ _, .__ C °� all[; �I:Ltd-LLl�CL�� _ _ ___ -_ �--- -- - - _ '� • c r,d[n, n rj n 3 - r_r_r1at LT Cl1r_EFl �(U— — -7[I CJ.�TCI Cll_LLIa:C:CCa_I=1�1:1:]JJ_ 'y S.T flow " tis..e■ — t, ANA FW It o i�ICIL-[I_CT -• _ _L11_DgQ-Lf1I:T]_�S_��J°t=l--� _ •+\• GOLDEN WEST ST TENTATIVE MAP TENTATIVE 'TRACT 15071 IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 17 TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH RANGE 11 WEST RANCHO LA BOLSA CHICA a1•.. STREET SECTIONS ' WARNER AVCNUC �/ -------— r{t LOCATION MAP AINENA DRIVE I PROJECT SUMMARY sort Iwa-3.7 loss EXISTING SINGLE FAM. TR. 5590 _. 1 I as.+•. ' ( 1 .) �m rsanc sm.usl-"Psm n anwl 1 A twwm No P"om romw-a_I to"KIM oasotws (sin. o 15 W 1 + I I MIACAI COURT PR"m u"o ust-spat Clair onaoso lass ..•. a i % _ 1 J aW 1 ) a4 lea EOa11 IRSO[•IR p l�S. I No.or��ors-I1 P"pV5[0 .«•''L' rcJ 12 13 14 e I x- ---" -- -... a•s n as 0u./Ic. _ r 1 ( I J wns sm11s OR oaaro5[o Hass unm•i.rlaosm ALT.SIDEWALK o • y _ «_— } I - ��'s T 1 LOCATION I S 16 -.ton 1"mu s olar 4 t 7FV I MADMA LANE' K I.a 1.7 4 07 I e Ny � ;t�,�' I 4 /•a�TM Al. 1 ENGINEER OWNER ar a a• y�r w s —.— I W 1 I r.l.rwom ti 4 _ J �'-jIy� _ I 1 euuo°Isa s.1 • ► ! «ql�y1 •� 11r1jIMt-NII W + II ♦ 1.1 3 tA Z It s n « Z « T► I m s^ PREPARED FOR SUBDIVIDER: z x BROADMOOR HOMES '"" '•� _ x a.%rrr�yly W Mrl. ,•. ; .• k " `l — �y EDWARD9 9TREE'T r 6 +� I rt —______ • __L,— I i f+ ,,�• ' _ ', I NOIES fOR SECTIONS- O a y sl II ; — -- ---- J 1 c,�.«w.•.,y .., m EXISTING SINGLE FAM. TR. 5601 O s ��� n� wiosrtlPe rt s c e �._. rmr r y wa1_ `IRr r y. MDS '...m. you v yra•L«r O SLATER AVENUE .a.(,r.M•91 1. �•anm G9•• —+— ryl09a 9911 wygy« "-a1-h _.— w••aa•aP . SITE PLAN TENTATIVE TRACT 15071 IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 27 TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH RANGE 11 WEST RANCHO LA BOLSA CHICA qR STREET SECTIONS ' WARNER AVENUE I • LOCATION MAP ATII[NA DRNE I PROJECT SUMMARY vIt rcatwt-37 Iwts . EXISTING SINGLE fAM. TR. 5590 tvsr•c s"ust-IIIr4n(IKw no wuwil/mRc 11 1 to tsevv lts ntlw R — ' AIU<AI COURT9-1 tow Oros"m1sat"w, r. •w n•n:.i t5,1,,p.v o.) t11aO51p WO 115t-s•at•rll otlr/xo na�ts _. ........ _ s rIR . tot 12 17 {4" —A_ w R[I 17 .v.t_ . ..1^'�'� I � .. .. arrarl• - e.uBapcl[. . I n.• , ........ •�,i- w M. 0.I11[fAfR 11l/dtllpgp w - --- y -( : ..v ..... I I aac 0111rs OR rl alos[e ti._ '—.----- ._ ., i" -•I.^ AU.SOEVVAIK LOCATION JI t 1 -'16n""m ton l nwn ory V1 i 1 •:�,. Ikt MADERA LANE • 14, v wl' a _ n '1� �� :'.' 4 ENGINEER OWNER IIOS CON9AI11G III.NbSII RIa1 r»r rcna uc � J awl- 0.1. 711 M�7 rll. tn ' to - i I• i �• o `�� 1' — o a " •' PREPARED fOR SUBDIVIDER: BROADM W I R HOMES ' - 00 Aso .. .Ir ( —? I j r1.Rra.at,1•e. ,.�..... us 1 III w F! 1 K EOWARDS STREET 10 9 I 9 • 7r,T 8 - o m le b rw •:/ ./ ��_ _.,�•� -[_- a$ '\' t101f.SS fOR :il:f,Il(ttl$ z I' LEOM _ N •..w.nm� ..w•.. IL 1. mnlRr EXISTING SINGLE fAM. TR. 5601 .�— MDS �". ee��rtTiw• 11' r�.1N/d w w•an � wr•v rlwc ti "" �� s v ar. wr.r r•.IIw• rnnr SLATER AVENUE ft Z rrm,.nrL Iwy.,m 1. nrrt,wm urrr N , Attachment No. 3 Standard Conditions of Approval 1. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, Building Division, and Fire Department as well as applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes,Ordinances,and standards. 2. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer prior to issuance of building permits. This analysis shall include on-site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations, retaining walls, streets,and utilities. 3. Hydrology and hydraulic studies shall be submitted for Public Works approval prior to recordation of the final map. On-site drainage shall not be directed to adjacent properties but shall_be handled by a Public Works approved method. Drainage flows from adjacent properties shall not be obstructed. Flows shall be accommodated per Public Works requirements. 4. Prior to issuance of building permits,an erosion control plan shall be submitted to Public Works Department. 5. During construction,the applicant shall: a. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems in all areas where vehicles travel to keep damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site: b. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day. c. Use low sulfur fuel (.05%) by weight for construction equipment; d. Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days (first stage smog alerts); e. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts. 6. Prior to issuance of building permits,receive a letter of map revision from FEMA declaring the tract exempt from floodplain requirements or submit copy of completed FEMA Elevation Certificates for each unit. If the tract is not considered exempt by FEMA,prior to final inspection, a second Elevation Certificate will be required for each unit "as built". 7. Prior to issuance of building permits, submit a construction vehicle control plan to Public Works for review and approval. 8. If outdoor lighting is included,high-pressure sodium vapor lamps or similar energy savings lamps shall be used. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage"onto adjacent properties and shall be noted on the site plan and elevations. Environmental Assessment #95-8 1 Attachment No. 3 7. Prior to issuance of building permits,receive a letter of map revision from FEMA declaring the tract exempt from floodplain requirements or submit copy of completed FEMA Elevation Certificates for each unit. If the tract is not considered exempt by FEMA,prior to final inspection,a second Elevation Certificate will be required for each unit "as built". 8. Prior to issuance of building permits, submit a construction vehicle control plan to Public Works for review and approval. 9. If outdoor lighting is included,high-pressure sodium vapor lamps or similar energy savings lamps shall be used.. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage"onto adjacent properties and shall be noted on the site plan and elevations. Environmental Assessment#95-8 2 Attachment No. 3 Responses to Comments Negative Declaration No. 95-8 I. INTRODUCTION This document serves as the Response to Comments on the Negative Declaration No. 95-8. This document contains all information available in the public record related to the Negative Declaration as of Tuesday, November 21, 1995 and responds to comments in accordance with Section 15088 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. This document contains five sections. In addition to this Introduction, these sections are Public Participation and Review, Comments, Responses to Comments, and Appendix. The Public Participation section outlines the methods the City of Huntington Beach has used to provide public review and solicit input on the Negative Declaration. The Comments section contains those written comments received from agencies, groups, organizations, and individuals as of Tuesday, November 21, 1995. The Response to Comments section contains individual responses to each comment. It is the intent of the City of Huntington Beach to include this document in the official public record related to the Negative Declaration. Based on the information contained in the public record the decision makers will be provided with an accurate and complete record of all information related to the environmental consequences of the project. II. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND REVIEW The City of Huntington Beach notified all responsible and interested agencies and interested- ,groups, organizations, and individuals that a Negative Declaration had been prepared for the proposed project. The City also used several methods to solicit input during the review period for the preparation of the Negative Declaration. The following is a list_of actions taken during the preparation, distribution, and review.of the Negative Declaration. 1. An official twenty (20) day public review period for the Negative Declaration was established by the City. It began on Thursday, November 2, 1995 and ended on Tuesday, November 21, 1995. Public comment letters were accepted by the City of Huntington Beach through Tuesday, November 21, 1995. 2. Notice of the Negative Declaration was published in the Huntington Beach Independent on- Thursday, November 2, 1995. Upon request, copies of the document were distributed to agencies, groups, organizations, and individuals. 3. A copy of the cover letter and the distribution list is available for review and inspection at the City of Huntington Beach,Planning Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648. ATTACHMENT NO. .7- III. COMMENTS Copies of all written comments received as of Tuesday, November 2, 1995 are contained in . Appendix A of this document. All comments have been numbered and are listed on the following pages. All comments from letters received have been retyped verbatim in a comment-response format for clarity. Responses to Comments for each comment which raised an environmental issue are contained in this document. IV. RESPONSE TO COMMENTS The Negative Declaration No. 95-8 was distributed to responsible agencies, interested groups, organizations, and individuals. The report was made available for public review and comment for a period of twenty days. The public review period for the Negative Declaration established by the City commenced on November 2, 1995. Copies of all documents received as of November 21, 1995 are contained in appendix A of this report. Comments have been numbered with responses correspondingly numbered. Responses are presented for each comment which raised a significant environmental issue. Several comments to not address the completeness or adequacy of the Negative Declaration, do not raise.significant environmental issues, or request additional information. A substantive response to such comments is not appropriate within the context of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Such comments are responded to with a "comment acknowledged" reference. This indicates that the comment will be forwarded to all appropriate decision makers for their review and consideration. CALTRANS-1: Comment: Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the Tentative Tract Map No. 15071. The proposed project is for a subdivision of 3.7 acres into 17 lots. Caltrans District 12 is a reviewing agency and has no comment at this time. Response: The comment identifies the project and states that Caltrans does not have any comment at this time. Comment is acknowledged; no substantive response is necessary. CALTRANS-2: Comment. Please continue to keep us informed of future developments which could potentially impact our State Transportation Facilities. If you have any questions, or need to contact us, please call Aileen Kennedy on (714) 724-2239. Response: Comment identifies a contact person at Caltrans. Comment is acknowledged; no substantive response is necessary. ATTA.rHMF.NT NO. 6.215 HBUHSD-1: Comment: On behalf of the Huntington Beach Union High School District I have received notice of the meeting of the subdivision subcommittee of the Planning Commission to review Tentative Tract Map 15071 pertaining to a proposed 17 lot subdivision for residential units at 17301 Edwards Street. I have also received and reviewed the Draft Negative Declaration (No 95-8) pertaining to this project. Response: The comment identifies that Huntington Beach Union High School District has reviewed the project. Comment is acknowledged and will be forwarded to the decision-makers for their review and consideration. HBUHSD-2: Comment: District staff have analyzed the existing capacity of our schools and projected enrollment growth for the next few years. We find that internal growth and approved development will absorb our capacity and that enrollment generated by new development will impose a financial burden on the District due to the need for additional classroom and auxiliary space. Response: Comment is acknowledged and will be forwarded to the decision-makers for their review and consideration. HBUHSD-3: Comment: Our analysis shows that the cost of adding permanent classroom space for new students is $28,277.80 per student, which consists of$15,676.97 for construction and furnishings and an additional $12,600.83 for the cost of land acquisition. Attached are details for these figures. Response: The comment provides information on the costs for land acquisition and construction of new school facilities. Comment is acknowledged and will be forwarded to the decision-makers for their review and consideration. HBUHSD-4 Comment: For this proposed development we project an increase of 3 students, or a potential cost of $84,833.40. We estimate that the homes will generate $30,742.099 in developer fees, leaving a shortfall of$54,091.31. Response: The projected increase in high school enrollment resulting from the project is three students. Negative Declaration No. 95-8 identifies that this increase may have an effect on the school district. The increase of three students is less than 0.5 percent of the Huntington Beach Union ATTACHMENT NO. .ZOO High School enrollment, however, and the acquisition of a new school site or construction of new classroom facilities will not be required to accommodate the students. Although the project will contribute to cumulative school impacts, the project's contribution is not considered significant. Staff maintains the project's impacts (three students)will be mitigated through the payment of school fees. HBUHSD-5 Comment: We certainly take issue with the finding in the Negative Declaration that the project would have less than significant impact on the schools, when this project alone falls short of funding its impact by more than $50,000. Response: Please refer to response HBUHSD-4. HBUHSD-6: Comment: Furthermore, the school districts have repeatedly asserted the importance of considering cumulative impacts of development throughout the City when assessing the effect on schools. Response: Please refer to response HBUHSD-4. HBUHSD-7: Comment: While we are sensitive to the burden that the costs of full mitigation place on a development, we are also concerned about the need to ensure that adequate classroom space is provided fro the children of those home buyers. Therefore, we request that, prior to approval of the Tentative Tract Map,the City require the developer to enter negotiations with the District for mitigation of the impact of the proposed development on our schools. Response: Please refer to response HBUHSD-4. HBUHSD-8: Comment: I would be pleased to meet with representatives of the developer and City staff to discuss this matter further. Response: Comment is acknowledged and will be forwarded to the decision-makers for their review and consideration. ATTACHMENT NO. �7 :ATE OF CAL"*WIA--BM"M AND TRAMW yAGENCY �. PETE VALSON, Governer DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION — smic'r 12 s¢� 'Sol PULLM AN SnEfT �' 1 4 TA ANA, CA 92705 3 �gg5 �1w 1 November 7. 1995 1�r Mary Beth Broeren V File: IGR/CEQA City of Huntington Beach_ SCH r none 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, Ca_ 92648 Subject: Tentative Tract Map NO. 1507; Subdi�^sior. of 3.7 acres MAO ?7 )o:s. Dear Ms. Broeren: T'riank you for the opportuniry-;e-woe-w and cow meTM on f e Ternz ive Tract MaD No. 1507). i be proposed project is for a subdivision o :.7 acres into 17 lots. Caltrans Distric► 12 caltrans-1 is a re%ieuing agcncv and Las no co=enr �. this Please continue to keep us informed of future developments wnicn could potentiaDyl Caltrars-2 impact our State Transportation Facilities. If you have any ouesa_ions, or need to contact us; please call Aileen Kennedy on (714) 724-2239. — Since;e)y r � Robert F:3 Chef Advance ?; g isrznch cc: Tom Loftus, OPR Ron Helgeson, HDQTRS Plamn ng Tom Persons, HDQTR.S Traffic Operations ATTACHMENT NO. 5,'1Z':VZ • Board'of Truss: e HUNTINGTON B ACH UNION Bonnie'cry ' o HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT Barbara JoCurhns * os Michael Simons i Q 10251 Yorktown Avenue Hunnngwn Beach, California 926e6-2999 (714) 964-3339 FAX(7la) 963-7684 David J. Hagen, Ed.D.,Superintendent of Schools r'Mr. Howard Zelefsky November 1, 1995�4: � . . Department of Community Development 2000 Main Street h p V 03 1995 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mr. Zelefsky: On behalf of the Huntington Beach Union Hi_ah School District I have received notice of the meeting of the cubdi•-isior, subco=i inee of the P lal- ng Con msson to review Tentative Tract HBUHSD-1 Map 15071 per-taining to a proposed 17 lot subdivision for residential units at 17301 Edwards Street. I have also received and reviewed Lie Draft lNecative Declaration. (No. 95-8; peraining to this project.. District staff have analyzed, the exists.g capacity of our schools and projecteu� enrollment growth for the next few vears. 'We fled that internal growth and approved development will absorb our capacity and that enrollment generated by new development will xBtlxsD-2 impose_ a financial burden on the District due to the need for additionai classroom and auxiliary space. Our analysis shows that the cost of adding permanent classroom space for new students is $28,277.80 per student, which consists of S15.676.97 for construction and furnistings and an HBUHSD-3 additional S12.600.83 for the cost of land acouisition. Attached are details for these figt:res. For this proposed development we project.an iL:rease of 3 snudenas, or a potential cost of HBUHSD—a $84,833.40. We estimate that the homes will generate S30.742.099 in developer fees, leaving a shortfall of S54.091.31. We cenainly take issue vit.the finding in the Negative Declararon that the project would have less than significant impact on the schools. when thi p=oj..ct alone xsuxsD-5 falls short of funding its impact by more than, S50.000. Furthermore, the school districts have HBUHSD-6 repeatedly asserted the importance of considering cumulative impacts of development throughout the City when assessing the effect on schools. While we are sensitive to the burden that the costs of full mitigation place on a development, we are also concerned about the need to ensure that adequate classroom space is provided for . the children of those home buyers. Therefore, we.request that, prior to approval of the HBUHSD-7 Tentative Tract Map, the City require the developer to enter negotiations with the District.for mitigation of the impact of the proposed. development on our schools. I would be pleased to meet with representatives of the developer and City staff to discuss this HBUHSD-8 matter further. Sincerely, Patricia Reid Koch, Ph. .r- Assistant Superintendent, Business Services Attachment ATTACHMENT NO. e mission of the HBUHSD, responsive to our diverse community expectations, is to educate all students by ensuring a relevant and focused educational program which develops responsible,productive and creative individuals with a capacity for leadership. Huntington Beach Union H ool District • 9-12 Configuration Cost Estimates Per Square Foot of Building Ar She Statistics Statistic Adjustments Factor Description Acres 40.00 Geographic >1OD.Orange Land Sq.Ft. 1,742,400 Small Building ` `N/A No Students 2,400 Index Adjustment <'z>>` < >`> <' Lee Saylor Net Sq.Ft per Student 91 Urban N/A No Gross Sq.Ft.per Student 94 Security tJ/A No Net Building Sq. Ft. 218,4D0 Base Fixed Fee Building Costs $95.74 Gross Building Sq.Ft. 225,600 Structures-Sto 1 Cost Inflator 100.DD% Building Class D Cost Per Total Cost Per. Category Factors Unit Sq.Ft. Total Costs Student' Total }lard:Costs :::::'::.:::: :.:g......... Buildin Costs Fared .... $95.74 S20,909,398 $8,712.25 Adjustments Lee Saylor $0.00 SO $0.00 On-She Development-General 5.D0% Of Building Costs $4.79 $1,045,470 $435.61 On-She Development-General S7,500 Per Acre $1.37 S300,D00 $125.00 On-She Development-Services 7.50% Of Building Costs $7.18 S1,568,205 S653.42 Utility Services 2.50% Of Building Costs $2.39 S522,735 S217.81 Off-She Improvements 10.00% Of Building Costs S9.57 $2,090,940 $871.22 . Energy Management 3.00% Of Building Costs S2.87 $627,282 $261.37 Other Hard Costs 1.D0% Of Building.Costs W. S209,091 $87.12 Hard Cost Sub-Total S/24.88 $27,273,723 $11,363.80 Soft Costs ... Arch./Eng.Fees 7.5D% Of Hard Costs S9.37 S2,045,4E4 S852.29 Inpection/Tests 2.50% Of Hard Costs $3.12 $681,828 $284.10 Plan Check Fees 0.75% Of Hard Coss $0.94 S204,548 585.23 Utility Fees 0.25% Of Hard Costs $0.31 $68,183 $28.411 Environmental Documentation 330,DD0 Per She S0.14 ,S30,000 $12.50 Archeaological Survey $5,000 Per Site $0.02 55,000 $2.08 Soils Report $20,0D0 Per She S0.09 $20,000 $8.33 She Survey $7.500 Per She S0.03- $7,500 .53.13 Appraisal 8 Escrow Costs $50,DD0 Per She S0.23 =,000 $20.83 Administ;ive Costs 3.00% Of Hard Costs :;.75 $515,194 S340.91 Relocation Costs $0 Per She S0.00- SO S0.00- Other Soft Costs 0.15% Of Hard Costs $0.19 $40,910 517.05 Soft Cost Sub-Total 5/8.19 $3,971,647 $1,654.85 :.. .......::......•..:...••.... ....- .......:..,........ :.,. FFBE&Teehnolocy : .. ::..:,.:: . :. - Fumiture 8 Equipment FFBF -.. .. (. _) 57:00 Per Sc.F Sr.DO 51,,,28,800 S6r7.00 Technology 8-Media $14.00 Per Bldg.Sq.Ft. S14.00 $3,057,600 $1,274.00 FF8E 8 Technology Sub-7ofal 521.00 $4,586,400 51,911.00 Hard/Soft 3 FF8E Cost Sub-Total $164.06 535.831-1170 S14,929.6S :Cohstcuctron Contin enc ;: ;:::;•>::>;::;•:; ::.::................. State Contingency 1.5A% Of Sub-Total ZZ46. $537,468. 5223 94-: State Contingency $2,000 Per School $0.01 52;D00 $0.83 District Contingency 3.50% Of Sub Total 55.74 51,254,091 $522.54 Contraction Contingency Sub T cta/ S8.21 S1;793,558 S747.32 Hard/Soft,FF8E,d Contingency Sub-Total S172.2T $37,624,729 $15,676.97 $37,624,728 „.6and S720,000 Per Acre 5131.87 $28,800,000 $12,000.00 Land Cost Sub-Total $731.87 $28,800,000 S1T000.00 Land Contingency..:.:. . .... ..... Slate Contingency 1.50% Of Sub-Total 51.98 $432,000 5180.00 State Contingency S2,1 M Per School S0.01 $2.000 $0.83 District Contingency 3.50% Of Sub-Total S4.62 S1,0D8,0D0 $420.D0 Land Condngency Sub-Total $6.60 $1,442,000 S600.83 Land 8 Contingency Sub-Tot31 $139.47 $30,242,000 S12,600.83 $30,242.000 Total Construction/Land Cost per Sq.Ft. $310.76 $67,866,728 328,277.80. $67,266,728 interim"L Support Facilities Werim Facilities $0 Per 30 Students $0.00 SO $0.00 Support Facilities $0.00 Per Net Sq.Ft. . $0.00 $0 $0.00 Inferium 8 Support FacrLties Sob-Tofa/ 50.00 $O _ 5000 GRAND TOTAL COST PER SO. FT. $310.75 567,866,72E $28,277.90 Source:Community Syeteme Aeeoc:e,ee. Inc. COSTSALS A .ACHMENT NO. 6. S0 ................. ............................ ..ATTACHIVIEN'I��6 ' SITE PLAN J J� TENTATIVE TRACT 15071 J J J A J JJ , JJ , IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH BEING A SUMMON OF A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 27 TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH RANGE It WEST RANCHO LA BOLSA CHICA • � J J A'rI■� STREETT SECTIONS WARNER AVENUE LOCATION MAP ATNENA DRIVE ;.I y PROJECT SUMMARY �___A_. 4 [rn r r. s[w I1.I rl SIR M.%AM-3.7 AM OOSIM SIZE USE-NURRIR EXISTING SINGLE FAM. TR. 5590 N "mr¢no raDPDseD zww-R-I Lair aDes"onowk R _ MIR�AI COURT R+WM(A D UZ-SNUE rallY DUA00 H(An w [m vn (SID.nun 100 1 -1 _ •+ �_ 17q i.A— ,•�,d -i rk a r.r �:�, ;�,•�`. _.._.._ _.,__..._ -'_.'_— -.I._.—r�,: OR-I7 RpPOYDL Ol T0n i3 fOr• Lot SIN '0.000 SNR RI7 IMP 12 13 1 SQUAK FELT A0U Dorm re D.U./AC.PUBIC M M S ARE PR POAD r — _ PUBIK UII1rSS ARE rR010aTD to A .rw a wIt - � MADERA LANE ° ENGINEER OWNER M)5 CORAXIINC MR.HIM"YDIW ' j - • • w 17M grDaRA IJrE a $11 I •r _. . _ nc -7 an• �rrr'cmN eual u _i wsw u w Rr. nA ea-lrlr w In y n: a z z m ++ PREPARED FOR SUBDIVIDER: Z _ _ _ _ _ w I BROADMOOR HOMES N .r I ,N.lpwol,1ae. rnr. EDWARDS STREET w ao a 10 ov NOTES 1'OR SECTIONS - ' N • �. �il.r nrt,aril.rt.w nw n: . ,, aRana EXISTING SINGLE FAM. TR. 5601 Fl" w l na IR [mi r c nmI MDS Wrir R w rm r+v W .mi.°mar. Hw•rm R IF9r 9rrrQ Sr1 11Rr n wwq grmq ngwnq . :'m m SLATER AVENUE s nrw m Ir -- n• Us ctr+.c.0 A+n a aua r:�Iml.c noDp au + . ru[. nac unm uvr+n s- rwomr snn ]eq'tlA+aM +-s-r. -r- rorsR vIn 9 . 1 i sr•r 1 r.r r•r r-r a.r 14 --- to i 1 i iI p Ir•r r �r•r _ '�BROADMOOR HOMES II Az 1 N t •i• ��I Southwest Inc. ...o..ra.�.�•..o.m .._�... ...�.. .��".i'i.�."........ � r i - lNow J i ,liol ILL T_ I II j _._ I i �� I j 1 I I r1 o O i= c i I` 'M � � I n r.I fix N I t ; _. t BROADMOOR HOMES II A•MRa[Tf t 1 southwest inc. ...a..�o.....�•�o.m ...�... ...�......_..... .... .... . - • ta��-ai+• s 6 i I 6 i i t i t �= MD i A _ ....... .... I rr ~' BROADMOOR HOMES L L L ll A iSouthwest Inc. ..._.....�:c' .........». •,1 . ATTACHMENT N0. 1 i < . i + s � �1 � � 1 i As HJ—1-0 m 10 i� My BROADMOOR HOMES V7 Southwest Inc. -low y r-r w.r ' r-r w-r w-r r.r r-e- U.N. T i i ILT— ..........'JoO I °i101/ s•r' I v.r i m-r �r.r i .I r r.r r•.r w•r i I r.r nr - I I � � --A f I i 100 EFL r.r v.r v-r Ir-rl W-r Lrj,-� 2 � t BROADMOOR HOMESIIKi SO Y2T1Mr{2 Inc. rar..s.a ems..4.m mot.... t Q� i ul � I I U ED It � I t BROADMOOR HOMES L A iI 1 Southwest Inc. ..a.�...�._...,o.m ........ ..._... .=c.........I... ......» ATTACHMENT No . a.� �I 177 L- -j OD t N I t i t BROADMOOR HOMES d V, South wtit Inc. AT,TAGHMENT-NO. .. �-TTA HMENT 7.......................................................................................................... TENTATIVE MAP TENTATIVE - TRACT 15071 J J JJJ „J +'J U J J•I J J qV THE CITY OF HUNTINGTQN BEACH BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE J J •J J , ,, NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 27 TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH RANGE 11 WEST RANCHO LA BOLSA CHICA J J J J • J J J J WARNER AVENUE , , ; —- LOCATICN MAP STREET SECTKM ATHENA DRIVE PROJECT SUMMARY SR 6CWW-3.7 Y}QS ._ _R.._._._. .. _..d....__.,.. EI651MC.91E USC-MURSOII' iut1c. _R R tIMMG ND PR0PM JOWL-R-i LMI DUGW , 1 -- ---- PRMOSm WD IR-smw rAmy DL77CHD RM6 �I 4-1 LOW outs"IRSMEMYI . d, R0.or LOTS-17 PROPM- I°R f<w0t m f W 'I' T a LOTSZE -6.000 souAw If"MMM SM RRt 100 9 EXISTING SINGLE FAM. TR. 5590 !•"' ] I G I ]Rn.R]m IP�.1 J I I!I! O� aRsn at DU Ile FM mum I lP I it MU(AI COURT PURE SRR 73 AM PamostD (SID.PUN 104) Pueue unms we PRaosm ✓i � SERER:CITY OF MMIMCIMI 6E/C11 orl+ ; IA N WER:ON Or RDMMMDR 6EACR GAS:S :SOIRKIM fJlldfN EDISOR EPWNP '>•' T8. 1 Inn.m ufw lr ,. 12 13 14 I n�sn� "� � ..-----...--'-'-----�P...... m Mlo�c.P:asoMN R �/ D 17 t.6 f�f_ ._LI f JcAia smtnn_I ` ' p I!! x� .7:roIIf °_1 �ryR� M qn ODlvwn 0 0 0 t - t� 5J q a 3.6 s.6 /¢ s.6 \ K I J r _a s I�� tlG O / a 11 Ru ns1Mc srMlcnfRs a RR sR ARE M a REROm n n ♦ y 15 16 ' I Iqr I'll n7 n / , F y t.t I'! MADERA LANE -0 F 1 �' •I!I! 4 °7PMRs cx so nn's ENGINEER OWNER j / •f - a. t I!II W R,ID W.wmsm MM° Q / f ilaowm I i J L" W10[INH CA 3 RL /11 N7-Mi4 OM t li Z p Pm s A~ _ s♦ _ sa I!I! O r a p Wag PREPARED FOR SUBDIVIDER: _, F ----1,'-- r- -- - --- S 2 t ! x BROADMOOR HOMES Y Ay W X / FFF tnP,.c 'a a`s I!I! 1w6w1'ifc ,► rr� I t' W ,� S1lCI1.K M A MR m ��� 3 1 _ _ - s.t Q; 1 11II EDWAiipS STREET ,i 10 g � 8 6-- NOTES FOR SECTIONS a !gr],1 PRroa n�nt nnl ---- SlAlttlls � N EXISTING SINGLE FAM. TR. 5601 W I � i Ili �t>l'ff OPIAI!I WMI�Xf.I1 M1,r mm.nn4�i1m° . 1 m Er�315 MOSo. QGA. f,AY Rini o an !ml r a.wnP- �: . wnur o, not sure sfl srtn � •�m ,ton a m°nc wu m y iu v n am riwasen nrww enmR ""` ■Pa "19 nt' SLATER AVENUE SLATER _ • mm�c n.s.0 -- . f:f€1 DEnf,sem oMR ORS. 0,1°!C VRRr OIfDOn , -S- rgRSm RMp , ]- Danc DD,IOIIII ' .....................................................4...............--...;.TTHMENT 8 ............................................. ... ...... �GITY- SPEGiFICATIONS (spe -cifi 'c''o'ti'o--n-----'-no: an, Description: u1TNTAAI IU Fl1R FTRF z" APPA R ATI K Ar-r--FS _ CTRFFT REFERENCE HUNTINDTON BEAD �•--�— FIRE CODE SECTION: 10.207 (a - 1) T1_R n/FS_ QR R(�Al1C TN AT t'_ TYPES QF DEVELOPMENTS RESCINDS SPEC. NO. 401 DATED 04/87 For Inforimdon Relative To Thb Spec ficathm Contact liunt{npbon Beech Flo Degimmu t L FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADWAYS A. All portions of ground level perimeter on all buildings shall be within 150' unobstructed travel of an improved all weather surfaced fire apparatus access roadway. B. Travel over fences, walls, hedges and through hindering landscaping does not qualify as unobstructed travel. C. Vehicular or predestrian gates obstructing required access must be installed per City Specification 403. II. MINIMUM WIDTHS, HEIGHTS AND TURNS FOR FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS_ ROADWAYS. A. Fire apparatus access streets, drives or toads shall have unobstructed drive widths of not less than 24' (based on two 12' travel lanes). Fire access streets, drives or toads adjacent to building fronts in commercial centers must-not be less than 27' unobstructed. • B. Parldng shall not infringe upon fire apparatus access roadways .(see Page 2; Items IV, A, 1, 2 and 3). C. Garage doors and eave overhangs shall not infringe upon this space except as permitted per City Specification 402. D. Corners must allow for clear travel as per City Specification 401.4. E. When medians are located in roadways, the minimum width must comply with. City Specification 401.6 IIL MINUMLiM LENGTHS AND DIMENSIONS FOR TURNAROUNDS FOR FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADWAYS A. Streets, drives or roads exceeding 150' but .less than 600' in length and terminating, shall be provided with a radiused or hammerhead turnaround per Page 2, Item IV, A and City Specifications 401.1, 401.2 or 401.3. B. Streets, drives or roads 600' or longer in length may not terminate in a radiused or hammerhead turnaround but must become part of an inter-tying loop circulation system. 0389E (8/87) Page 1 of 2 LCITY SPE06FICATIONS 7- Specification no: 401 Description: MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR FIRE REFERENCE HUNTING g APPARATUS ACCESS -STREETS. .. FIRE CODE SECTION•=T`u,�`a -u DRIVES. OR ROADS IN ALL TYPES O DEVELOPMENTS RESCINDS SPEC. NO. 401 DATED 04/97 For Mfornl don Rdatiw To This Spedfloation Contact Huntington A d- Fin Dtpwtment C. Minimum turning radii on fire apparatus access streets, drives or roads must equal or exceed the dimensions in City Specification 401.4. D. When obstructions, such as landscaping, trees or other objects, are placed within radiused turnarounds, they must comply with City Specification 401.5. IV. A. X - Centerline to Centerline X P P - Curbface to Curbface (see figure i below) 1. No parking is permitted in cul- 151, 62' de-sac when "P" is less than 80'. 2. If parallel parking is permitted 299' 62' or possible on one side only, curbface to curbface must be at least 321. 300' 80' Exception: Mini-storage warehouse complexes- width may be 28' with 599' 80' temporary parking on one side only. must 3. If parallel parking is permitted or 600:. loop possible on both sides curbface to curbface must be at least 401. centerline of street Centerline of tumerm" Approved Raymond C. Picard, Fire Chief 0 389F (8/S 7) Page 2 of 2 � TT . �IME ....................... JAN p 2 1996 Ernie A. Gjendem r 6362 Marcellena Drive _.... Huntington Beach, CA 92647 (714) 841-5981 (Va.l�y ��'�i'► (�Vv er "` December 25, 1995 Dear , I am so concerned about our city that I feel I must write you. I have such strong feelings on this subject that I took the time to write you on Christmas Day. First off, I would like to say that my property's back yard property line is common to the west property line of the Mukai property. The owners of the Mukai property at 17301 Edwards Street, in the City of Huntington Beach, want to sell and,develop their land. I understand Broadmoor Homes out of the San Diego area will be the purchaser and developer of the seventeen(17) individual homes. I have a bad back and was only able to attend a short portion of the City's Planning Commission meeting on December 12, 1995. When I got home, I laid down and rested_but watched the latter portion of this meeting on the local cable television channel. It seems that the commission meeting turned down a•request for Madera Lane to connect. The commissioners voted,from their hearts and not their heads. It seems that residents from Madera Lane south of the Mukai property(which happens to be an.unused nursery)complained that they did not want the south Madera Lane road to connect with the north Madera Lane road. The residents-based their claim on noise, increased traffic,crime, fire trucks, etc. This is ludicrous. Putting up road barriers is not the answer. And to make matters worse,the commissioners bought off on the residents' pleas. The city planners before both you and I had a plan. It was drawn up and approvedyears ago. The master plan from the very beginning was to have Madera Lane connect when the Mukai property was sold. I heard at the commission meeting one fellow got up and spoke and said that when he bought his property on Madera Lane(south of the Mukai property)he had no idea that the two would ever meet. He must not have any foresight. I don't even live on Madera Lane,but 1-have enough sense to know that someday the two roads will meet. I walk the neighborhood for exercise quite frequently and understood that. After all,there is no cul-de-sac, it's a dead-end road-on both ends. Did anyone ever think of asking the potential seventeen new residents what ,. they wanted-shouldn't they have a voice. Also, shouldn't the commissioners be thinking and speaking for the new city residents-the ones who buy the Broadmoor homes. I encourage you to drive by and take a look at what I am talking about. If the property is developed like I think the approval was given,all the vehicular and most of the pedestrian traffic will come in from the north. This is not right. Why can't the traffic be split in both directions? Don't let the commissioners vote sway your vote when this comes before you. It is an injustice. I want the roads to connect and they should. Please do some research before rubber stamping the Planning Commission's recommendation. Questions, call me please. cc: -ojeet-?4wmer cerely and Merry Christmas, RECEIVED CITY CLERIN CITY OF Huntin �Beach Morrow HUHTINGTOp; i3EACH, CALIF, Boa 865 FEB Jr 3 33 Huntington Beach CA 92648 February 5, 1996 Huntington Beach City Council 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mayor Sullivan and City Councilmembers: Huntington Beach Tomorrow would like to make the following comments concerning Agenda Item D-1, License Agreement for Encroachment into the Public Right-Of-Way for Outdoor Dining Purposes,Resolution No. 6715 Establishing License Agreement Fee, which you will be considering at tonight's Council Meeting. We wish to thank Ms.Fallon for meeting with HBT on this item during January. We are pleased to see that the staff has agreed that the intent of the Council and direction to staff during actions taken on outdoor dining in 1994 was to prepare a fee schedule for use of public right-of-way where that right-of-way was to be used for outdoor dining: We disagree in the strongest possible way, however, with staffs subsequent recommendations, that 1. no fee be charged for this use of public right-of-way, and, 2. a use fee of 0.45/ft.2 is inappropriate. Our reasons for requesting a fee for use of public right-of-way are as follows: 1. The public right-of-way exists in a community primarily for benefit of all of the public. Though usually thought of as providing public access,public right-of-way also provides additional open space and, properly done and appropriate in size, is part of the community's quality of life. 2. When the public right-of-way is used for commercial purposes, the public gives up a convenience and an amenity and has the right to, and should be, compensated for that use. This position is consistent with accepted and expected practice in business and commerce for the use of space. 3. Approximately 75% of other cities surveyed (11 of the 14 cites for which staff provided you information in the original 12/15/95 RCA])have a use fees based on square footage, number of seats or both. 4. This city is in financial difficulties. This fee is an additional source of revenue. Without such a fee and in addition to losing the space, city residents would have to make up for this any loss of revenue provided by these fees. Residents would then wind up paying at least twice for the loss of their space. 5. Use of this space already provides a competitive advantage to the businesses receiving it. If these businesses do not pay for that space they receive a double advantage over their competitors. 6. To give public right-of-way away for commercial purposes without compensation would, in effect, constitute a gift of public funds, a gift which it appears would be illegal. G�zt�t�2t uh i ea.�tdx-- 5. The giving away of public right-of-way without compensation would also set a bad precedent, since, it would be difficult or impossible, in fairness, not to do the same for others and, if denied to others businesses, could place those businesses at a competitive disadvantage. 6. As these things go, if use fees are not adopted now, they never will be. The use fee amount recommended by staff is inappropriate because: 1. Our information from a realtor who deals with downtown space rental along Main Street is that the going rate for space, whether inside or outside,is $1/ft.Z. The rate is higher along PCH. 2. Fees in other cities, included in the information provided by staff and referenced above, range from $0.50 to $36. Thus $0.45 is even below the lowest of these rates. 3. As open space and an amenity and in terms of more convenient access to all businesses in the vicinity of the area involved,we believe the public right-of-way which would be lost would be much more valuable than $0.45/ft.2 . We request, therefore, 1. a use fee be included in the license fee and 2. the use fee be set at a minimum of$1/ft.2, a charge which is very near the bottom of those for which we have information. We further request, as we did on December 15, 1995, that, 3. since it was established in recent meetings with staff that there either are or may be other continuing commercial activities in areas which the public owns or has vested rights, the staff be directed to return to the Council at the earliest possible time with information in this regard, provision for public input and action, ordinances and use fees such areas. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this matter. Sincerely, Mark Porter, President Huntington Beach Tomorrow ^eu�e G3 y r • SURVEY SUMMALIY OUTDOOR DINING ON PUBLIC RIGHT 01: WAY JUNE 1995 - FOR CITY OF SANTA MONICA POLICY BASIS CHARGES CITY PRG.IECT LAND VALUE ADM. FEE COMMENTS* e 1) Beverly Hills Discounted No Graduated scale over 5 years - 1st year free, $1.25 Patterned after Santa Monica and others. Design CBD Triangle PSF/Mo. in 51h year-revocable annual restrictions with permanent barriers OK 2) Boston Discounted No Market value of land.- SF basis paid monthly - Unique policy - individual cases, SF rate not Redov. Property collected over 6 mos., revocable annual available -20% discount mentioned 3) Denver No Yes No chargos Imposed so far, revocable annual Sales tax is enough revenue - encouragement of 16th St. Mall permit business is primary 4) Hermosa Beach No Yes $0.50 PSF / rno. -5-year permit - rovocablo ;/ Permanent barriers OK, restrictions on chairs, Various rental rate may change during term . 5) Long Beach No Yes Between $250 -$750 for 0-400 SF., $2 PSF over Permanent barrier OK, no profit motive by city Pine Ave. 400 -revocable annual 6) Los Angeles No Yes One-limo fees of $502.90 Investigation, $502.90 Permanent barrier OK- some districts do not Various Districts processing, and $124 $1tlG per seat for sewer; impose processing fee revocablo indefinite 7) Miami No Yes $23.50 ea. for chairs 1-10, $1.75 ea. for 11 i . No permanent barrier allowed Coconut Grove Revocablo annual 8) Miami Beach No Yes $10 PSF occupied, plus$7.11 per chair- No permanent barrier allowed - no Increases - Ocean Drive revocable annual, $150 App fee Lincoln Ave. moratorium to encourage business ` r 9) Palm Springs No Yes $75 ono-time fee - revocable Indefinite Fees kept low to encourage business Highway 111 10) Pasadona Yes No $5.80 -$7,20 PSF/yoar-based on too valuo, 10%- No alcohol, no permanent barriors allowed, Old Town return annual revocable-$100 App. fee ✓ patterned after Santa Monica 11) San Diego No Yes $475 ono-time fee - revocable, Indefinite Fees low to encourage business, permanent t Downtown barriers OK 12) San Francisco No Yes $36 per seat up to 360 -revocable annual Restaurant lobby caused City Council to reduce Various fees In Aug. 93, no permanent barriers allowed 13) Wost Hollywood Discounted No $100 app. too plus $.50 PSF month, revocable Consulted with Santa Monica, no permanent Various annual barrier allowed *All require insurance coverage. i 7144749359 VENEZIA COMMUNITIES 215 P02 FEB 02 '96 11:41 M16_51QN PAGE 02 BROADMOOR HOMES aro"Moor Homes $405 MOM Drive, Sufte 200 Southwest, Inc. San DkVo, CA 92121 S -4S6 19 -9454 "7� Far 610-465-7449 February 1, 1996 Ms. Codnit Brockway, City Clerk CITY OF MUNTtNGTON BEACH P'O.Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Re: Withdrawal of Appeal for Tentative Map 015071/Conditional Use Permit No. 95-72 Variance No. 95.16/Negative Declaration No, 95-8 Dear M. s. Brockway, -Hroadmoor Homes Southwest, Inc. as applicant in the above referenced project is hereby withdrawing its request for the appeal to be heard on February $, 1996, Please feel free to call me if you have my questions regarding,the above . Tha:nk you. Sincerely, i-11c,4el Chali Exe6u7z vt Vice f-izqident Chief Finam".:4 Officer cc, Ms. Mary Beth Broeren, Planning Dev*'eutment Mr. Gene Hirso —T PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. County of Orange ) I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am PUBLIC NOTICE ON FILE: A copy of the o I 17 one (1) and two roposed request s on tits p ng over the age of eighteen years, and not a NOTICE OF , the.clty Clerks on It, (z s ry ngte lv PUBLIC HEARING 2000 Main Street, Hunting- Use Pew.No. 95_72 in- ton ;Beach, California party to or interested In the below BEFogE THE ton eludes the request to con- COUNCIL the p for Inspection by COUNCIL OF THE the public. A copy of the stwct an aPProximately ten entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of CITY OF staff report will beava;reb►e (1� #cot high brook wall, HUNTINGTON BEACH to interested parties at the up to tour(4 feet of which the H UNTINGTON BEACH INDEPENDENT, a NOTICE- IS HEREBY_ City Clerk's Office after is retaining wall,along Ed- GIVEN that on Monday, . February 1,1906. 1wards Sbeet.Variance No. news pa er of general circulation printed February 1996, at 6:30 ALL INTERESTED PER- 95-10 is a request to allow p g / P PM in the City -Council SONS are invited to attend a wall on Edwards Street in Chambers, 2000 Main said hearing and express fleu of a five (5) foot wide" and p u I is h e d in the City of Huntington Street, H�nt,ngton Beak, opinions or submit evl. landscape area regmred by the City Council will hold a dance for or against the. code. LocaYon: f 7301 fd BeachCounty of Orange State of public hearingon the fol- application as outlined wards Street (west side of / `7 Orange, Edwards Street, 000 feet lowing planning and zoning above.If you challenge the: north of.Slater Avenue). and that attached Notice is a item: I city council's -action in California, 1. ANNUAL REVIEW OF court, you may be limited Project Planner; Mary Beth true and complete co as was printed THE HOLLY-SEA CLIFF DE. to raising only those Issues Broeren p copy p VELO0 ENT AGREEMENT you or someope else NOTICE IS HEREBY and. published in-the Huntington Beach (NO. 90-1) OMPLIANCE raised at the pubUch Ing GIVEN that Items);eE1 cov- REPORT: (cant:City of described In this notice, or aced by Final Environmen Huntington ach:Request; In written correspondence �+mpac,Report No.891. and Fountain Valley issues of said Review the Holly-Seaciiff delivered to the City at,or No fetrthar acn°n Is neces" j Development Agreement prior to,the public hearng. NICE IS HEREBY newspaper to wit the issue(s) of: No. WI - Annual ComplI If there are any further GIVEN that initial Report. Location- q�11� p1e»e call the H011y- iif Specific Plan Planning Division at 536. mental assessments for the Area Protect Planner: Rob. : 5271 and refer to the above Items- were pro- rank in above item. Direct your cessed and completed.in 2. TENTATIVE TRACY written Communications to accordance with the Cali. NO. 15071JCONDi. the City Clark. forma Ouattty Act It was TONAL USE PERMIT NO. Connie Brockway, determined that Nerri(s)#2, with mitigation, wouldd not January 25 , 1996 95-72/NARIANCE NO. li5- Clty Clark,City of Hut• have any m ca envl- iSMEGATIVE DECLARX tk*%n Beach, 2000 ronmental and.that TION NO. ppel (APPEAL) Main Street,'2nd Floor, ff a mitigated rragative deota ApplicanUAppellam; Broad thntthtgton Beach,C01 ration is warranted. These moor Homes Southwest, ifornla 92"S (714), erwironmertial assessments Inc Request: To appeal are on.file at the City of the Planning Commission's ' 6 Ste'7 Huntington Reach Corn. approval,of Tentative Tract Published Huntington munity .Development De- I declare, under penalty of perjury, that Map No. 15071, Condi- Beach-Fountain Valley in. pwtment,2= Main Street tional Use Permit No. 95- dependent January a 17 tat 25,1 and are available for public the foregoing is true and correct. 72,Variance No.95-16 and ,996. Inspection and. comment Neepgal: Declaration No. 014-855 by contacting the Cam- Sign ion for subdlunity Development' Del s for purposes of levell- i mment, or by telephon I g(714)536-5271. Executed on January 25 / 199 6 at Costa Mesa, California. Signature fFa. 1 . 1, 4 ' CASH IWIPT ' • COMMUNITY IWILOPMENT CITY OF hLINTINQTON bEACh JI Address All Correspondence To: P.O.BOX 190 • HUNTINGTON BEACH,CALIFORNIA 92648 OR CALL(714)536-5241 HUNTINGTON BEACH II�1 _, DATE l�E. RECEIVED FROM � �� 1'f'D 0 �Y n' ,c ADDRESS be-1Lam' Sff 200 FOR ✓�� RECEIVED BY ❑ CASH VCHECK DESCRIPTION TR FUND ACCOUN DEPT. DIV. AMOUNT BUSINESS LICENSE R AA -0<0 CD 234 BUILDING PERMITS R AA 3-06-00 CD 234 PLAN CHECK FEES R AA 7-05-00 CD 234 PLUMBING PERMITS R AA 3-07-00 CD 234 ELECTRICAL PERMITS R AA 3-08-00 CD 234 HEATING PERMITS R AA 3-09-00 CD 234 POOL PERMITS R AA 3-15-00 CD 234 PARK&REC(UNIT LOT FEE) R SK 3-55-00 CD 234 LIBRARY FEES(CELF) R AA 7-11-00 CD 234 GRADING PERMITS R AA 3-11-00 PW 411 GRADING PLAN CHECK FEE R AA 7-24-00 PW 411 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY R AA 7-19-00 CD 234 ZONING APPLICATIONS R AA 7-01-00 CD 231 O PARK&REC(SUBDIV.LICENSE) R SK 3-14-00 CD SMIP G AA 2-01-16 00 000 OTHER OTHER TOTAL $ ]ZOO . 00 AMOUNT RECEIVED $ 711j6 . 6� 3. 56r 2 b0.;./ .Lc. .':.200,00 9..-VsL1Js ..N ,]V No. = 30. 1440 CUSTOMER COPY NOTICE OF APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMMION ACTION OF 12/12/95 Date of Planning Commission Action ' TO: Planning Dept (2copies) DATE: 12/22/95 City Attorney (1 copy) FILED BY Michael Chau, Executive Vice President, Broadmoor Homes Southwest Inc. REGARDING: Tentative Tract Map No. 15071/CUP No. 95-72/Variance No. 95-16/ Negative Declaration No 95-8 Tentative Date for Public Hearing: To be determined Copy of Appeal Letter attached. LEGAL NOTICE AND A.P. MAILING LIST MUST BE RECEIVED IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE Connie Brockway City Clerk - x5227 BROADMOOR*JOMES 5Bro40:�i Homes 405in Drive, Suite 200 Southwest, Inc. San Diego, California 92121 619.455.9454 Fax 619.455.7449 December 22, 1995 it DEC 2 21995 Ms. Connie Brockway City Clerk City of Huntington Beach P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 Re: Appeal of Approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 15071/Conditional Use Permit No. 95-72/Variance No. 95- 16/Negative Declaration No. 95-8. Dear Ms. Brockway: Broadmoor Homes Southwest, Inc. as applicant in the above referenced project is submitting for your action an appeal of the Planning Commissions decision. Our appeal is based upon the undue hardships to Broadmoor Homes that the city Fire Department will be creating because of the elimination of the through street access of Madera Street. We respectfully submit to you our appeal request. Please feel free to contact us at anytime if you have any questions or need any further information. Sincerely, III&Ilk�� Michael Chau Executive Vice President cc: Mary Beth Broeren, Planning Dept. ry " W -C-( r .L � r- n �'rn^n c Q C.p � A Tradition of Excellence Since 1959 BROADMOOR HOMES eroadmoor Homes 5405 Oberlin Drive, Suite 40 Southwest, Inc. San Diego, CA 92121 : 619-455-9454 Fax 619-455-7449 X- December 22, 1995 Ms. Connie Brockway City Clerk City of Huntington Beach P,O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 Re: Appeal of Approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 15071/Conditional Use Permit No. 95-72/Variance No. 95- 16/Negative Declaration No. 95-8. Dear Ms. Brockway: Broadmoor= Ho.t.n§t=.Southwest;'- l'nc,.;: as applicant in the above referenced project is submitting -for your action an appeal of the Planning Commissions- decision Our appeal is based upon the undue hardships to Broadmoor. Homes that the city Fire Department will be creating because of the elimination of the through street access of Madera Street. We respectfully submit to you our appeal request. Please feel free to contact us at anytime if you have any questions or --need any further information. Sincerely, _ /cal Chau Exective Vice President cc: Mary ,,Beth"Broeren;'P.lanning Dept. A Tradition of Excellence Since 1959 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING /�Z. BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE �ubllS�i /�a1 " 96 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH /—/ 9— 9� NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday, February 5, 1996, at 630 PM in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the follov,ing planning and zoning item: ❑ 1. ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE HOLLY-SEACLIFF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (NO. 90-1)- COMPLIANCE REPORT: Applicant: City of Huntington Beach Request: Review the Holly-Seacliff Development Agreement No. 90-1 - Annual Compliance Report. Location: Holly- eacliff Specific Plan Area Project Planner: Robert Franklin 2. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15071/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-72/ ,V/ VARIANCE NO. 95-16/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 95-8 (APPEAL): Applicant/Appellant: Broadmoor Homes-Southwest, Inc. - Request: To appeal the Planning Commission's approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 15071, Conditional Use Permit No. 95-72, Variance No. 95-16 and Negative Declaration No. 95-8 for a 17 lot subdivision for purposes of developing 17, one (1) and two (2) story single family residential units. Conditional Use Permit No. 95-72 includes the request to construct an approximately ten (10) foot high block wall, up to four (4) feet of which is retaining wall, along Edwards Street. Variance No. 95-16 is a request to allow a wall on Edwards Street in lieu of a five (5) foot wide landscape area required by code.. Location: 17301 Edwards Street (west side of Edwards Street, 600 feet north of Slater Avenue). Project Planner: Mary Beth Broeren NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item(s)41 is covered by Final Environmental Impact Report No. 89-1. No further action is necessary. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that initial environmental assessments for the above items were processed and completed in accordance with the California Quality Act. It,was determined that Item(s) 92, with mitigation, would not have any significant environmental effects and that a mitigated negative declaration is warranted. These environmental assessments are on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, and are available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community Development Department,or by telephoning (714) 536-5271. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City Clerk's Office, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office after February 1, 1996. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in (cclg10205) Legal Notification for February 5,1996 City Council Meeting • Page 2 this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to,the public hearing. If there are . any further questions please call the Planning Division at 536-5271 and refer to the above item. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Connie Brock%vay, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 536-5227 I ' n (cclglo205) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday, February 5, 1996, at 6:30 PM in the City Council . Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following planning and zoning item: ❑ 1. ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE HOLLY-SEACLIFF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (NO. 90-1) - COMPLIANCE REPORT: Applicant: City of Huntington Beach Request: Review the Holly-Seacliff Development Agreement No. 90-1 -Annual Compliance Report. Location: Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan Area Project Planner: Robert Franklin X2. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15071/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-72/ VARIANCE NO. 95-16/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 95-8 (APPEAL): Applicant/Appellant: Broadmoor Homes Southwest, Inc. - Request: To appeal the Planning Commission's approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 15071, Conditional Use Permit No. 95-72, Variance No. 95-16 and Negative Declaration No. 95-8 for a 17 lot subdivision for purposes of developing 17, one (1) and two (2) story single family residential units. Conditional Use Permit No. 95-72 includes the request to construct an approximately ten (10) foot high block wall, up to four (4) feet of which is retaining wall, along Edwards Street. Variance No. 95-16 is a request to allow a wall on Edwards Street in lieu of a five (5) foot wide landscape area required by code.. - Location: 17301 Edwards Street (west side of Edwards Street, 600 feet north of Slater Avenue). Project Planner: Mary Beth Broeren NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item(s)#1 is covered by Final Environmental Impact Report No. 89-1. No further action is necessary. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that initial environmental assessments for the above items were processed and completed in accordance with the California Quality Act. It was determined that Item(s) #2, with mitigation, would not have any significant environmental effects and that a mitigated negative declaration is warranted. These environmental assessments are on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, and are available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community Development Department, or by telephoning(714.) 536-5271. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City Clerk's Office, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office after February 1, 1996. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in (cc1g10205) Legal Notification for February 5,1996 0ouncil Meeting • Page 2 this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning Division at 536-5271 and refer to the above item. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 536-5227 (eclglozos) CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST -SUBJECT: ��rT�c.e..t � -['� 60111 &U P Q5-7 2. d1 . 11. / N r�l �I S�•�S DEPARTMENT. CQ_rhAwv n 1. jt x g=Q&Aug!: MEETING DATE: I;L� 5�1OALO CONTACT: t t*_r,•., PHONE: t&'<0 N/A YES NO Is the notice attached? ( ) QQ ( ) Do the Heading and Closing of Notice reflect City Council(and/or Redevelopment Agency)hearing? Are the date, day and time of the public hearing correct? ( ) (X) ( ) If an appeal, is the appellant's name included in the notice? ( ) ( ) If Coastal Development Permit, does.the notice include appeal language? Is there an Environmental Status to be approve&by Council? ( ) Is a map attached--for publication?' Is a larger ad required? Size ( ) ()() Is the verification statement attached indicating the source and accuracy of the ,Waiting list? ( ) QQ ( ) Are the applicant's name and address part of the mailing labels? Are the appellant's name and address part of the mailing labels? If Coastal Development Permit, is the Coastal Commission part of the mailing labels? If Coastal Development Permit,are the Resident labels attached? Is the33343 report attached?-.(Economic Development Dept. items only) Please complete the following: I. Minimum days from publication to hearing date Q 2. Number of times to be published 3. Number of days between publications NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING �Ju b /S�7 /—a S q t0 BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday, February 5, 1996, at 6:30 PM in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following planning and zoning item: ❑ 1. ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE HOLLY-SEACLIFF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (NO. 90-1)- COMPLIANCE REPORT: Applicant: City of Huntington Beach Request: Review the Holly-Seacliff Development Agreement No. 90-1 -Annual Compliance Report. Location: Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan Area Project Planner: Robert Franklin ❑ 2. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15071/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-72/ VARIANCE NO. 95-16/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 95-8 (APPEAL): Applicant/Appellant: Broadmoor Homes Southwest, Inc. - Request: To appeal the Planning Commission's approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 15071, Conditional Use Permit No. 95-72, Variance No. 95-16 and Negative Declaration No. 95-8 for a 17 lot subdivision for purposes of developing 17, one (1) and two (2) story single family residential units. Conditional Use Permit No. 95-72 includes the request to construct an approximately ten (10) foot high block wall, up to four (4) feet of which is retaining wall, along Edwards Street.. Variance No. 95-16 is a request to allow a wall on Edwards Street in lieu of a five (5) foot wide landscape area required by code.. Location: 17301 Edwards Street (west side of Edwards Street, 600 feet north of Slater Avenue). Project Planner: Mary Beth Broeren NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item(s)41 is covered by Final Environmental Impact Report No. 89-1. No further action is necessary. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that initial environmental assessments for the above items were processed and completed in accordance with the California Quality Act. It was determined that Item(s) 42, with mitigation, would not have any significant environmental effects and that a mitigated negative declaration is warranted. These environmental assessments are on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, and are available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community Development Department, or by telephoning(714) 536-5271. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City Clerk's Office, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office after February 1, 1996. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in (ccIgIO205) Legal blotification for February 5,1996 City Council Meeting • Page 2 this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning Division at 536-5271 and refer to the above item. Direct f your written communications to the City Clerk. Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 536-5227 (cclglo205) � V APN: 165-103-04 fa* APN: 165-103-05 fa* APN: 165-103-06 fa* De B. Swenson John V. Hinrichs David S. Springer 17261 Kristopher In 17271 Kristopher Ln 17281 Kristopher Ln Huntington Bh CA 92647-5663 Huntington Bh CA 92647-5663 Huntington Bh CA 92647-5663 APN: 165-103-07 fa* APN: 165-103-08 fa* APN: 165-103-09 fa* Kenneth J. Irons Jimmy D. Landers Edward F. Thorn 17301 Kristopher In 17311 Kristopher Ln 17321 Kristopher Ln Huntington Bh CA 92647-5628 Huntington Bh CA 92647-5628 Huntington Bh CA 92647-5628 APN: 165-103-10 fa* APN: 165-103-11 fa* APN: 165-103-12- fa* Michael E. Smith Richard S. Payne Martin R. Bounds 17331 Kristopher Ln 17341 Kristopher In 17351 Kristopher In Huntington Bh CA 92647-5628 Huntington Bh CA 92647-5628 Huntington Bh CA 92647-5628 APN: 165-103-13 fa* 110 WA U 1 Frank M. Roche 28206 Driza �`D�352 Mission Viejo CA 92692 *�"��^� � e)2QC.h,(� �16 3�12 3Z Ilo• 331 �45 . ':. �,o.•vre.ifan t`1 ero-c� A 11�er-1•o l�u�'1 l c�-... 52-1-A Z S15'so►'� 1�r. i 1105 103. ti�1 II0 • 34-z 3a1 ���a.r► •, To.-rno...rc�. �a#ri c.K �-e.-F--eX C.`-� lr�-�� �l 3451 lkr S 4-v phe,r L,n . � po ��x 23'1I.o c'IZI�Ti 4k urn- ,nk�,q ac t.,CA`'►2.W-A 110.3�1Li 11 �e Gas+y -3r. �vnut.�io..►-� lr�a�l�- 1,..�i I1,S �:o-t� ��c.F1: - (pSS'T Z pres �+ c P1pS Cor'hv 11-0 LA PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST"B" MAILING LABELS - 4/3/95 President 1 Patricia Koch 32 Edna Littlebury 17 H.B. Chamber of Commerce HB Union High School Disrict Golden St. Mob. Hm. Owners Leag. 2210 Main Street,Suite 200 10251 Yorktown Avenue 11021 Magnolia Blvd. Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Garden Grove,CA 92642 Judy Legan 2 David Hagen 32 Jerry Buchanan 29 H.B./F.V. Board of Realtors HB Union High School district HB City Elementary School Dist. 8101 Slater Ave. 10251 Yorktown 20451 Craimer Lane Huntington Beach,CA 92647 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 William D. Holman 11 County of Orange/EMA 19 Pacific Coast Homes Michael M. Ruane,Dir. 23 Corporate Plaza,Suite 250 P.O. Box 4048 Newport Beach CA 92660-7912 Santa Ana,CA 92702-4048 Ron Frazier 31 Mr. Tom Zanic 12 I Planning Department 19 Westminster School District Seacliff Partners Orange County EMA 14121 Cedarwood Avenue 520 Broadway Ste. 100 P. O. Box 4048 Westminster CA 92683 Santa Monica,CA Santa Ana,CA 92702-4048 1 OC County Harbors,Beach 35 Pres.,H.B. Hist. Society 13 County of Orange/EMA 19 and Parks Dept. C/O Newland House Museum Thomas Mathews P. O. Box 4048 19820 Beach Blvd. P. O. Box 4048 Santa Ana,CA 92702-4048 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Santa Ana,CA 92702-4048 James Jones 30 Chairperson 14 County of Orange/EMA 19 Ocean View Elementary Historical Resources Bd. Bob Fisher,Dir. School district Comm. Services Dept. P.O. Box 4048 17200 Pinehurst Lane 2000 Main St. Santa Ana,CA 92702-4048 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Marc Ecker 28 Huntington Beach Mall 33 Fountain Valley Attn: Pat Rogers-Laude Elementary School District 7777 Edinger Ave. #300 17210 Oak Street Huntington Beach CA 92647 Fountain Valley CA 92708 E.T.I. Corral 100 8 Dr. Duane Dishno 29 Country View Estates HOA 35 Mary Bell HB City Elementary School Dist. Carrie Thomas 20292 Eastwood Cir. PO Box 71 6642 Trotter Drive Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92626 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Tom Ryan,Environmental 9 CSA 33 Country View Estates HOA 35 Board Chairman 730 El Camino Way#200 Gerry Chapman 8852 Luss Drive Tustin,CA 9680 6742 Shire Circle Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92648 gaables\phnlbls APN: 110-342-46 fa* APN: 110-342-47 fa* APN: 110-342-52 fa* Kenneth V. Kerins Richard K. Yoshizuka Gary G. Toguchi tA"("1 17392 Encino Cir 17402 Encino Cir 17401 Madera Ln Huntington Bh CA 92647-6137 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6137 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6146 APN: 110-342-53 fa* APN: 110-342-54 fa* APN: 110-342-55 fa* James .W. Pal in% (V:,i(if1Q� ?11L., Robert Dandeh Rao Henry N. Huertas 17391 Madera Ln 438 Main St C 17371 Madera Ln Huntington Bh CA 92647-6146 Huntington Bh CA 92648 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6146 APN: 110-342-56 fa* APN: 110-344-10 fa* Neil Horowitz •,TetcrNm-uc-V}oroW Mason R. Kenny 17361 Madera Ln 17422 Madera Ln Huntington Bh CA 92647-6146 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6154 APN: 110-344-12 fa* APN: 110-344-13 fa* APN: 110-344-14 fa* Brian R. Lesser% Tc,�C�IC i`t.(¢SS� Harry A. Keep Harold Urmston 17392 Madera Ln 17382 Madera Ln 7858 California Ave 226 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6148 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6148 Riverside.CA 92504 APN: 110-344-15 fa* APN: 165-101-14 fa* APN: 165-101-15 fa* Francis M. Altig Mark J. Conta John A. Hitt �! 17362 Madera In 6552 Kilda Cir 6532 Kilda Cir Huntington Bh CA 92647-6148 Huntington Bh CA 92647-5625 Huntington Bh CA 92647-5625 F APN: 165-101-16 fa* APN: 165-101-17 fa* APN: 165-101-29 fa* George Force Gjendem Ernie A Christopher Johnson 6531 Rennrick Cir 6362 Marcellena Dr 6552 Rennrick Cir Huntington Bh CA 92647-5638 Huntington Bh CA 92647 Huntington Bh CA 92647-5638 APN: 165-101-30 fa* APN: 165-101-31 fa* APN: 165-101-32 fa* John J. Burns Robert O. Gard Robert L. Norman 6532 Rennrick Cir 6531 Kirklund Cir 6541 Kirklund Cir Huntington Bh CA 92647-5638 Huntington Bh CA 92647-5626 Huntington Bh CA 92647-5626 APN: 165-101-44 fa* APN: 165-101-45 fa* APN: 165-101-46 fa* Patricia A. French Ivor P. Isaacs Christopher A. Evans 6552 Kirklund Cir 6532 Kirklund Cir 6531 Shenlyn Dr Huntington Bh CA 92647-5626 Huntington Bh CA 92647-5626 Huntington Bh CA 92647-5645 APN: 165-101-47 fa* APN: 165-102-01 fa* APN: 165-102-02 fa* Joseph Occhipinti Marshall E. Neil David C. Fronk 6541 Shenlyn Dr 6502 Shenlyn Dr 6522 Shenlyn Dr Huntington Bh CA 92647-5645 Huntington Bh CA 92647-5646 Huntington Bh CA 92647-5646 APN: 165-103-01 fa* APN: 165-103-02 fa* APN: 165-103-03 fa* Robert N. Cooper Barbara Tetreault Allen C. Soule Jr. 17231 Kristopher Ln 17241 Kristopher Ln 17251 Kristopher Ln Huntington Bh CA 92647-5663 Huntington Bh CA 92647-5663 Huntington Bh CA 92647-5663 APN: 110-331-07 fa* APN: 110-331-08 fa* APN: 110-331-09 fa* Louis A. Rodriguez Kamales Som Kambiz Azabdaftari 6341 Athena Dr 6351 Athena Dr 6361 Athena Dr Huntington Bh CA 92647-6123 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6123 Huntington Bh-CA 92647-6123 'i APN: 110-331-10 fa* APN: 110-331-11 fa* APN: 110-331-12 fa* Joseph Capocciama Richard L. Sparks Carl Melsheimer 6371 Athena Dr 6381 Athena Dr 6391 Athena Dr Huntington Bh CA 92647-6123 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6123 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6123 APN: 110-331-13 fa* APN: 110-331-14 fa* APN: 110-331-15 fa* Church Community Methodist Of Winte Art Erickson Jr. Jean E. Edwards 6662 Heil Ave 6411 Athena Dr 6431 Athena Dr Huntington Bh CA 92647 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6125 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6125 APN: 110-331-16 fa* APN: 110-331-17 fa* Vranek Charles J Gloria L. Mc Lean 6441 Athena Dr 6451 Athena Dr Huntington Bh CA 92647-6125 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6125 APN: 110-333-06 fa* APN: 110-333-07 fa* APN: 110-333-08 fa* Lowell R. Crowe Ali A. Contreras Heidi A. Walker 6332 Athena Dr 17271 Gurney Ln 17291 Gurney Ln Huntington Bh CA 92647-6124 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6138 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6138 APN: 110-333-09 . fa* APN: 110-333-10 fa* APN: 110-333-11 fa* Rajesh B. Patel Victor A. Larsen William D. Walker 17301 .Gurney Ln 17311 Gurney Ln 17321 Gurney Ln Huntington Bh CA 92647-6138 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6138 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6138 APN: 110-333-12 fa* APN: 110-333-13 fa* APN: 110-333-14 fa* Murray H. Marker Dva Russell A. Grootegoed 17322 Destry Cir 17312 Destry Cir 17302 Destry Cir Huntington Bh CA 92647-6135 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6135 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6135 APN: 110-334-06 fa* APN: 110-334-07 fa* APN: 110-334-08 fa* Peter C. Beane John M. Hiles Mary Joanne Deal 6332 Marcellena Dr 6342 Marcellena Dr 6352 Marcellena Dr Huntington Bh CA 92647-6129 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6129 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6129 APN: 110-334-09 fa* APN: 110-334-10 fa* APN: 110-334-11 fa* Gjendem Ernie A Andrew V. Scherz Jean M. Peterson 6362 Marcellena Dr 17332 Gurney Ln 17322 Gurney Ln Huntington Bh CA 92647-6129 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6139 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6139 APN: 110-334-12 fa* APN: 110-334-13 fa* APN: 110-334-14 fa* Thomas J. Harrington William B. Haifley Brian J. Grogan 17312 Gurney Ln Po Box 2057 . 17292 Gurney Ln Huntington Bh CA 92647-6139 Huntington Bh CA 92647 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6139 APN: 110-334-15 fa* APN: 110-334-16 fa* APN: 110-334-17 fa* Linda S. Yamamoto Dennis Sweeney Howard Erdley Iii 6372 Athena Dr 6382 Athena Dr 6352 Athena Dr Huntington Bh CA 92647-6158 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6158 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6158 APN: 110-334-18 fa* APN: 110-334-19 fa* APN: 110-334-20 fa* Kenneth K. Williams A. Richard Johnson Richard D. Tromanhauser 6402 Athena Dr 6412 Athena Dr 6432 Athena Dr Huntington Bh CA 92647-6126 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6126 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6126 APN: 110-334-21. fa* APN: 110-334-22 fa* APN: 110-334-25 fa* Thomas K. Anderegg Arthur C. Litheredge Hitoshi T. Mukai 6442 Athena Dr 17291 Madera Ln 17292 Madera Ln Huntington Bh CA 92647-6126 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6127 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6127 APN: 110-334-26 fa* APN: 110-342-15 fa* APN: 110-342-16 fa* i Michael P. Hickey Edward L. Byrne Jeffrey From 17272 Madera Ln 17362 Alta Vista Cir 17372 Alta Vista Cir Huntington Bh CA 92647-6127 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6130 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6130 APN: 110-342-17 fa* APN: 110-342-25 fa* APN: 110-342-26 fa* Irwin B. Kanode Ronald Moran Glenn A. Canigiani 17382 Alta Vista Cir 17391 Mira Loma Cir 17381 Mira Loma Cir Huntington Bh CA 92647-6130 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6149 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6149 APN: 110-342-27 fa* APN: 110-342-28 fa* APN: 110-342-29 fa* Konn Danley Martin Hubert Richard S. Labonski 17371 Mira Loma Cir 17361 Mira Loma Cir 17362 Mira Loma Cir Huntington Bh CA 92647-6149 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6149 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6149 APN: 110-342-30 fa* APN: 110-342-31 fa* Lyman D. Taylor Burney P. Tate 17372 Mira Loma Cir 17382 Mira Loma Cir Huntington Bh CA 92647-6149 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6149 APN: 110-342-33 fa* APN: 110-342-38 fa* David. E. Wilson William G. Campbell 17402 Mira Loma Cir 17401 Encino Cir Huntington Bh CA 92647-6149 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6137 APN: 110-342-40 fa* APN: 110-342-41 fa* APN: 110-342-42 fa* Paul G. Wood William H. Small Jr. Nicolas P. Mora 17381 Encino Cir 17371 Encino Cir 17361 Encino Cir Huntington Bh CA 92647-6137 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6137 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6137 APN: 110-342-43 fa* APN: 110-342-44 fa* APN: 110-342-45 fa* Kenneth Roy Cotr Runzel Michael E. Williams Sherman Wayne L. Wiley 17362 Encino Cir 17372 Encino Cir 17382 Encino Cir Huntington Bh CA 92647-6137 Huntington .Bh CA 92647-6137 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6137 • I 110-344-07 110-343-16 110-334-24 Edward & Ann Biss Louis&Peggy DeBernardi Shiyouhei Mukai 17642 Madera lane 6362 Santa Ynez Drive 635 Irvine Avenue Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Newport Beach, CA 92663 110-344-06 110-342-36 (-t -50 Duane Tonelli Jerry Fisher Ghn.r�e. 5l^� Phillips 6452 Santa Ynez Drive 17442 Encino Circle Madera Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647on Beach, CA 92647 110-344-05 110-342-36 -50 James Woodare Lous Grillo &Evelyn Biggs 6442 Santa Ynez Drive 17441 Encino Circle Madera Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647ton Beach, CA 92647 110-344-04 110-342-35 110-344-09 DVA John&Mary Roulette Kenneth Chow 6422 Santa Ynez Drive 17442 Mira Loma Circle 17432 Madera Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 110-344-03 Broadmoor Homes Southwest 110-344-08 Howard & Sherry Graybehl Attn: Michael Chau Gerald Gentilini = Shsfl8 Ger 6402 Santa Ynez Drive 540 Oberlin Drive, STE 200 17442 Madera lane Huntington Beach, CA 92647 San Diego, CA 92121 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 110-344-02 Gene Hirao Robert Maurer Venezia, Inc. 6392 Santa Ynez Drive 15 Posada Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Irvine, CA 92714 g:labels:"ITM 15071 Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach f ` Office of the City Clerk P.O.Box 190 _ Huntington Beach,CA 92648 � / t� �=l Lam. �•, 'i HUNTINGTON 3E.ACH,-k� i 503 SEVENTH ' I 1NGTpy HUfNT�I02410413 IVG7TOl�UT)Y TEACH, CA - `-2,64i; "CORPOR.I t- Yf U L 1 J 3 ,;• �.� .� A17. /� o y cpUNTY LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ILL .:T..-•-r,:^�.:aR M�^.-�e+^.',T.�u _^ .� t•- - .:s.: •r, sue. ...,�?� F'+Y£arm-<scsa+wv'.x+zr�e�?•��""r:: S ^r.:,�s?J�t""�^"ya T7�''?'�.'�- ^;y�. City Clerk _ G City of Huntington Beach [� Oce of the City Clerk ' P.O. Box 190 Ountffinigton Beach,CA 92648 FAL_ES MATTE€WJILR ,cl'. �T N1INGTp H UN TJ NGTO�a ,"�� y p� RPOR d AP # 0241 2 4'1041'3 ak 1 �.:.�.s , �- 0 C/• a I7,1909. �\� cpUNTY CP I MAI NnTiff - PURLiC HEARING ., . , sit t eL t t t 1 un. IL---..il.i:..11 - ;. -.2r.rt.Jx:S• �;q-�+ gfi�:�sr�ea:mrcr:�.averer����,Ks�c�ars�uf.!yu�:3►_ -- - - ---"'--- --- _. _1.�.....__• ,�, _ -•s.;,�.�,.�::v,sa=:.r.:rr�..r ':asap �. �' Connie Brockway,City Clerk , • City of Huntington Beach , Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 f , 1 APN: 165-103-12 fa* 01�'O 7 i NTINGr Martin R. Bounds Ory 17351 Kristopher Ln V�✓ftx'�f~9 1 I Q =NCORPOB�7� �F rO/ / c Huntington Bh CA 92647-5628 Q cFc��Nas TY �'P\� LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING i-- -� _+-�.vs9"-^ -'�Tt-_ ^c--^"'-�'a^,C_ -i T.�'f. ^:?^-c"'�.-...�r.r _ •w-'-•!q--•--�^-- r�•-�4r:N+� e—S , NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday, February 5, 1996, at 6.30 PM in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following planning and zoning item: ❑ 1. ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE HOLLY-SEACLIFF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (NO. 90-1)- COMPLIANCE REPORT: Applicant: City of Huntington Beach Request: Review the Holly-Seacliff Development Agreement No. 90-1 -Annual Compliance Report. Location: Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan Area Project Planner: Robert Franklin X2. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15071/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-72/ VARIANCE NO. 95-16/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 95-8 (APPEAL): Applicant/Appellant: Broadmoor Homes Southwest, Inc. - Request: To appeal the Planning Commission's approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 15071, Conditional Use Permit No. 95-72, Variance No. 95-16 and Negative Declaration No. 95-8 for a 17 lot subdivision for purposes of developing 17, one (1) and two (2) story single family residential units. Conditional Use Permit No. 95-72 includes the request to construct an approximately ten (10) foot high block wall, up to four (4) feet of which is retaining wall, along Edwards Street. Variance No. 95-16 is a request to allow a wall on Edwards Street in lieu of a five (5) foot wide landscape area required by code.. Location: 17301 Edwards Street (west side of Edwards Street, 600 feet north of Slater Avenue). Project Planner: Mary Beth Broeren NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item(s) 41 is covered by Final Environmental Impact Report No. 89-1. No further action is necessary. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that initial environmental assessments for the above items were processed and completed in accordance with the California Quality Act. It was determined that Item(s) 42, with mitigation, would not have any significant environmental effects and that a mitigated negative declaration is warranted. These environmental assessments are on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, and are available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community Development Department, or by telephoning (714) 536-5271. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City Clerk's Office, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office after February 1, 1996. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in (cclg10205) _ _.� _ _-; .lr.'-.� �j i.— ,1 �:2r. 7`n'y.'�-e'?a'.y Y..S. .yY.-,...�n^•'r �• +r n. __ - `•::!ice• --.,'+ i. YS��? '` -�T�7!' rtC• �Y :f+.'l ..'ate -�T�-�� 110-342-32 Merij , Cameron TR Personal & Confidential 1503 S. Coast Drive Ste. Costa Mesa, CA 92626 100 AP llbw331-09 110-34237 Bascoy, Loren K2 TR Margolis, David G. Azabdaftari, Kalbiz 17421 Encino Circle 6361 Athena Dr. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 AP #165-101-46 Ali Ostovarpour AP 110-342-36 6531 Shenlyn Drive Grillo, Louis TR Huntington Beach, CA 92647- 174,41 Encino Circle 5645 H untington Beach, CA 92647 AP 165-103--04 110-342-37 De B. Swenson Margolis, David G. 1514 Alta Glen Drive 17421 Encino Circle Towers #3 Huntington Beach, CA 92647:= San Jose, CA 95125 165-103-14 110-342-28 Pasquale F. Pirri Saylor'; Lucille 17381 Kristopher Lane Hubert, Martin Huntington Beach, CA 92647 17361 Mira Loma Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92647: AP 110-344-05 \ James Woodall �\ 6442 Santa Ynez Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Cy AP 110-344-11 _ waldron, . Harvey H. 17402 Madera St. Huntington Beach, CA 92647: 110-344-07 110-343-16 110-334724 Edward & Ann Biss Louis&Peggy DeBernardi Shiyouhei Mukai.� 17642 Madera lane 6362 Santa Ynez Drive 635 Irvine Avenue Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Newport Beach, CA 92663 110-344-06 0-342-36 Ch, 50 Duane Tonelli Jerry Fisher Ghn rye. Fshs-rhillips mo i+-� P 1, 6452 Santa Ynez Drive 17442 Encino Circle adera Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 9264Ton Beach, CA 9264 110-344-05 / 110-342-36~� 5� James Woodare v Lous Grillo Evelyn Biggs6442 Santa Ynez Drive 17441 Encino Circle adera LaneHuntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647on Beach, CA 9264 110-344-04 ✓ 110-342-35 110-344-09 DVA John&Mary.Roulette Kenneth Chow 6422 Santa Ynez Drive 17442 Mira Loma Circle 17432 Madera Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 9261 110-344-03 Broadmoor Homes Southwest' 110-344-08 Howard & Sherry Graybehl Attn: Michael Chau Gerald Gentilini C. 6402 Santa Ynez Drive 54050berlin Drive, STE 200 17442 Madera lane Huntington Beach, CA 92647 San Diego, CA 92121 Huntington Beach, CA 926, 110-344-02 ✓ Gene Hirao Robert Maurer Venezia, Inc. 6392 Santa Ynez Drive 15 Posada Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Irvine, CA 92714 g:labels:lTM 15071 Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 G.;23 J Huntington.Beach,CA 92648 HUNTINGTON f3E.ACH. {S�I•QENT`-; 503 SEVENTH ING HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA °�1.64} Tpy�F AP # 0241041.3 y \ c•:"..... •-���'"—ram _ �/��`. :'.,�,, .• . f yC ��t 17,nee►c �� T'y ' �;': NT_j LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ;_ :� 'IIIIIIIIIfII�llllif�rl1tI11I1fI1'I11lll'I��III�Itlllllll�lllll �`�`� r'y' �,' c _�,,•-_tl ••vx^ �•+.t +s.�oyr as�a�:sa�,.r«c., ,r.+�•'":?,•t;,!+,7. •,�. Y� �.":�: + ` w'., .w- ...f.,•..'v.c.vwnr-,.•-xr�a�. .:1�!!{ "�`�!,'�.,_. ...,..••..\., .•.., �7ai�r; .��:• �:iv:r�:{.ar. r;w::.:. ,r:•v^.••'ri 5''-..::.'�`; .: iti::i:• - 4.4, �t .74 t~ _ c' ( ' C i .,�1. .3 r tY C - .... . vCity of Huntington Beach -- - Office of the City Clerk P.O.Box 190 ;�� ( ountington Beach,CA 92648 - �, A1r` _ t L. i L ES IMAT T4_, W 503 �NTINGTp 44 HUNTiNGTO4 8H � '�9� i`- 4' 2 41U 41'3 f.. ' `c`r oR►o�, it 0 Q Connie Brockway,City Clerk • • City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 MUSAWAy you RW a� A�i•T APN: 165-103_12 f Martin R. Bounds G.V•��!�,�`� INGTOy 17351 Kristopher Ln �O�—c„cop►o��F�o �F9 Huntington Bh CA 92647-5628 � — yv ` F�DUNTY LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING _ _'^•^�•e_" :-!Z�.�.�i••eL• �FtiyY'..-.,t-.- _ ':F � - �+1::�:•- --.1.... -__ e•r -Y now :l V12 WAR At R. tit mot Wool -- _ 6 J+ APN: 165-103-04 fa+ APN: 165-103-05 -- fa* APN: 165-103-06 fa* De B. Swenson '� �4 - G1 'Ok John V.'Hinrichs 0/k\ David S. Springer 17261 Kristopher Ln Ts �o e 17271 Kristopher Ln 17281 Kristopher Ln Huntington Bh CA 92647-5663� /9 S� Huntington Bh CA 92647-5663 Huntington Bh CA 92647-5663 APN: 165-103-07 fa* APN: 165-103-08 L1K fa* APN: 165-103-09 fa* Kenneth J. Irons r Jimmy D. Landers Edward F. Thorn ©K 17301 Kristopher Ln 17311 Kristopher Ln 17321 Kristopher Ln Huntington Bh CA 92647-5628 Huntington Bh CA 92647-5628 Huntington Bh CA 92647-5628 APN: 165-103-10 6�C fa* APN: 165-103-11 b K fa* APN: 165-103-1 aC fa* Michael E. Smith ` Richard S. Payne Martin R. Bounds V 17331 Kristopher Ln 17341 Kristopher Ln 173SI Kristopher Ln Huntington Bh CA 92647-5628 Huntington Bh CA 92647-5628 Huntington Bh CA 92647-5628 APN: 165-103-13 fa* r j I t0 Frank M. Roche Ot,-, 28206 Driza lD 3`6 Z J6 Y�Iv 1 new �Y, Mission Viejo CA 92692 1'ri7!1�1 101 e,2C,11,\,CiA qZt` tt6 3y2 3Z ha- 331• �� v l9ao Asn+on �tv�►.+� �SoorjZ�tZ StSSo►'� �. tic5 Ic�3• ►�-t �/ I10 3yZ- am � r3fc o—n To-rno rc�. �c�#ri c.i� �e.-4 eX C.q. yl-o ev z y,- Lvi E�,eC.Lcc,, CA Z(r CA c'►Ztc`d'I I ,p �f(kk Ito'3Lt�-1 ►t 17 3 geG cA-,CA Ll2l�y1 �vncwt-�c� lr�wl+- lJ�'�(,S �io-rc' ��K•�c�F1: �yb'i z Pres,aA•o M DS Cor'Sv 1-kn'f`� �'t 3Z0 Kc ;1 t N T-r A PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION CHECK"B" MAILING LABELS - 4/3/95 President 1 Patricia Koch 32 Edna Littlebury 1 H.B. Chamber of Commerce HB Union High School Disrict Golden St. Mob. Hm. Owners Lez 2210 Main Street,Suite 200 10251 Yorktown Avenue . 11021 Magnolia Blvd. Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Garden Grove,CA 92642 Judy Legan 2 David Hagen 32 Jerry Buchanan, 2 H.B./F.V. Board of Realtors HB Union High School district HB City Elementary School Dist. 8101 Slater Ave. 10251 Yorktown 20451 Craimer Lane Huntington Beach,CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 William D. Holman 11 County of Orange/EMA 1 Pacific Coast Homes Michael M. Ruane,Dir. 23 Corporate Plaza,Suite 250 P.O. Box 4048 Newport Beach CA 92660-7912 Santa Ana, CA 92702-4048 Ron Frazier 31 Mr.Tom Zanic 12 I Planning Department 1 Westminster School District Seacliff Partners Orange County EMA 14121 Cedarwood Avenue 520 Broadway Ste. 100 P. O. Box 4048 Westminster CA 92683 Santa Monica,CA Santa Ana,CA 92702-4048 i 1 OC County Harbors,Beach 35 Pres.,H.B. Hist. Society 13 County of Orange/EMA 1 and Parks Dept. C/O Newland House Museum Thomas Mathews P. O. Box 4048 19820 Beach Blvd. P. O. Box 4048 Santa Ana,CA 92702-4048 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Santa Ana,CA 92702-4048 James Jones 30 Chairperson 14 County of Orange/EMA 1 Ocean View Elementary Historical Resources Bd. Bob Fisher,.Dir. School district Comm. Services Dept. P.O. Box 4048 17200 Pinehurst Lane 2000 Main St. Santa Ana, CA 92702-4048 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Marc Ecker 28 Huntington Beach Mall Fountain Valley Attn: Pat Rogers-Laude Elementary School District 7777 Edinger Ave..#300 17210 Oak Street Huntington Beach CA 92647 Fountain Valley CA 92708 E.T.I. Corral 100 8 Dr. Duane Dishno 29 Country View Estates HOA Mary Bell HB City Elementary School Dist. Carrie Thomas 20292 Eastwood Cir. PO Box 71 6642 Trotter Drive Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92626 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Tom Ryan,Environmental 9 CSA 33 Country View Estates HOA Board Chairman 730 El Camino Way #200 Gerry_ Chapman 8852 Luss Drive Tustin,CA 9680 6742 Shire Circle Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92648 g:lables\phnlbls APN: 110-342-46 fa* APN: 110-342-47 fa* APN: 110-342-52 0� fa* Kenneth V. Kerins Richard K. Yoshizuka Gary G. Toguchi 17392 Encino Cir 17402 Encino Cir 17401 Madera Ln Huntington Bh CA 92647-6137 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6137 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6146 APN: 110-342-53 fa* © APN: 110-342-54 fa* APN: 110-342-55 fa* James W. Pal in; Robert Dandeh Rao Henry N. Huertas 8 17391 Madera Ln 438 Main St C 17371 Madera Ln Huntington Bh CA 92647-6146 Huntington Bh CA 92648 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6146 APN: 110-342-56 fa* (�� APN: 110-344-10 =0� fa* Wa' '^ - SI- Neil Horowitz •SQCu�t��� }�otow �� Mason R. Kenny 17361 Madera Ln 17422 Madera In. Huntington Bh CA 92647-6146 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6154 �+ l APN: 110-344-12 fa* APN: 110-344-13 / fa* APN: 110-344-14 fa* Brian R. Lesser-.Sc�Vk.t�. la SS Harry A. Keep Harold Urmston 17392 Madera Ln 17382 Madera In 7858 California Ave 226 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6148 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6148 Riverside CA 92504 APN: 110-344-15 fa* APN: 165-101-14 4�� fa* APN: 165-101-15 fa* Francis M. Altig Mark J. Conta John A. Hitt 61C 17362 Madera Ln 6552 Kilda Cir 6532 Kilda Cir Huntington Bh CA 92647-6148 Huntington Bh CA 92647-5625 Huntington Bh CA 92647-5625 APN: 165-101-16 fa+ APN: 165-101-17 fa* APN: 165-101-29 fa* George Force (�� Gjendem Ernie A Christopher' Johnson 6531 Rennrick Cir 6362 Marcellena Dr 6552 Rennrick Cir ' Huntington Bh CA 92647-5638 Huntington Bh CA 92647 Huntington Bh CA 92647-5638 APN: 165-101-30 K fa* APN: 165-101-31 K fa*_ APN: 165-101-32 fa* John J. Burns 61 Robert O. Gard Robert L. Norman a� 6532 Rennrick Cir 6531 Kirklund Cir 6541 Kirklund Cir `'� Huntington Bh CA 92647-5638 Huntington Bh CA 92647-5626 Huntington Bh CA 92647-5626 0540VARPNA, /' APN: 165-101-44 fa* APN: 165-101-45 fa* (APN: 165-101-46 fa+ Patricia A. French O�� Ivor P. Isaacs hristopher A. Evans 6552 Kirklund Cir 6532 Kirklund Cir 6531 Shenlyn Dr Huntington Bh CA 92647-5626 Huntington Bh CA 92647-5626 Huntington Bh CA 92647-5645 APN: 165-101-47 / fa* APN: 165-102-01 o fa* APN: 165-102-02 A I-- fa* Joseph Occhipinti v� Marshall E. Neil David C. Fronk 6541 Shenlyn Dr 6502 Shenlyn Dr 6522 Shenlyn Dr Huntington Bh CA 92647-5645 Huntington Bh CA 92647-5646 Huntington Bh CA 92647-5646 APN: 165-103-01 fa* APN: 165-103-02 fa* APN: .165-103-03 fa* Robert N. Cooper Barbara Tetreault Allen C. Soule Jr. I 17231 Kristopher Ln 17241 Kristopher Ln 17251 Kristopher Ln - Huntington Bh CA 92647-5663 Huntington Bh CA 92647-5663 Huntington Bh CA 92647-5663 TE APN: 110-331-07 a* APN: 110-331-08 fa* APN: 110-331-09 fa* Ivi Louis A. Rodriguez Kamales Som v Kambiz Azabda£tari 6341 Athena Dr 6351 Athena Dr 6361 Athena Dr Huntington Bh CA 92647-6123 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6123 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6123 APN: 110-331-10 fa* APN: 110-331-11 /fa* APN: 110-331-12 fa* Joseph Capocciama Richard L. Sparks V Carl Melsheimer 6371 Athena Dr 6381 Athena Dr 6391 Athena Dr Huntington Bh CA 92647-6123 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6123 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6123 .P.PN: 110-331-13 fa* / APN: 110-331-14 L/ fa* APN: 110-331-15 / fa* Church Community Methodist Of W e Art Erickson Jr. Jean E. Edwards v 6662 Heil Ave 6411 Athena Dr 6431 Athena Dr Huntington Bh CA 92647 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6125 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6125 APN: 110-331-16 /fa* APN: 110-331-17 ✓ fa* (}(FN f/D Vranek Charles J v Gloria L. Mc Lean 6441 Athena Dr 6451 Athena Dr ay S�55on �e Huntington Bh CA 92647-6125 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6125 APN: 110-333-06 Vlfa* APN: 110-333-07 fa* APN: 110-333-08 ✓ fa* Lowell R. Crowe Ali A. Contreras Heidi A. Walker 6332 Athena Dr 17271 Gurney Ln 17291 Gurney Ln Huntington Bh CA 92647-6124 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6138 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6138 APN: 110-333-09 fa* APN: 110-333-10 fa* APN: 110-333-11 fa* Rajesh B. Patel Victor A. Larsen William D. Walker 17301 Gurney Ln 17311 Gurney Ln 17321 Gurney Ln Huntington Bh CA 92647-6138 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6138 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6138 APN: 110-333-12. a+ APN: 110-333-13 / fa* APN: 110-333-14 J// fa* Y Murra H. Marker Dva V Russell A. Grootego. 17322 Destry Cir 17312 Destry Cir 17302 Destry Cir Huntington Bh CA 92647-6135 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6135 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6135 APN: 110-334-06 v fa* APN: 110-334-07 fa* APN: 110-334-08 / fa* Peter C. .Beane John M. Hiles Mary Joanne Deal ✓ 6332 Marcellena Dr 6342 Marcellena Dr 6352 Marcellena Dr Huntington Bh CA 92647-6129 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6129 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6129 APN: 110-334-09 ✓ fa* APN: 110-334-10 Y fa* APN: -110-334-11 fa* Gjendem Ernie A Andrew V. Scherz Jean M. Peterson 6362 Marcellena Dr 17332 Gurney Ln 17322 Gurney Ln Huntington Bh CA 92647-6129 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6139 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6139 APN: 110-334-12 fa* APN: 110-334-13 ✓ fa* APN: 110-334-14 fa* Thomas J. Harrington William B. Haifley Brian J. Grogan 17312 Gurney Ln Po Box 2057 17292 Gurney Ln Huntington Bh CA 92647-6139 Huntington Bh CA 92647 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6139 APN: 110-334-15 if a* APN: 110-334-16 fa* APN: 110-334-17 fa* Linda S. Yamamoto yV/ Dennis Sweeney Howard Erdley Ii 6372 Athena Dr 6382 Athena Dr 6392 Athena Dr Huntington Bh CA 92647-6158 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6158 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6158 APN: 110-334-18 fa*. APN: 110-334-19 ./ fa* APN: 110-334-20 fa- Kenneth K. Williams A. Richard Johnson Richard D. Tromanhauser 6402 Athena Dr 6412 Athena Dr 6432 Athena Dr Huntington Bh CA 92647-6126 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6126 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6126 APN: 110-334-21 fa+ APN: 110-334-22 fa* APN: 110-334-25 V fat Thomas K. Anderegg Arthur C. Litheredge Hitoshi T. Mukai 6442 Athena Dr 17291 Madera In 17292 Madera Ln Huntington Bh CA 92647-6126 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6127 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6127 APN: 110-334-26 fa* APN: 110-342-15 - / fa* APN: 110-342-16 / fa* Michael P. Hickey Edward L. Byrne V Jeffrey From VVV 17272 Madera Ln 17362 Alta Vista Cir 17372 Alta Vista Cir Huntington Bh CA 92647-6127 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6130 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6130 APN: 110-342-17 �a* APN: 110-342-25 ✓ fa* APN: 110-342-26 v fa* Irwin B. Kanode Ronald Moran Glenn A. Canigiani 17382 Alta Vista Cir 17391 Mira Loma Cir 17381 Mira Loma Cir Huntington Bh CA 92647-6130 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6149 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6149 APN: 110-342-27 /fa* APN: 110-342-28 fa* v APN: 110-342-29 ,_✓ fa* Konn Danley ✓ Martin Hubert; 4X,1!* Richard S. Labonski 17371 Mira Loma Cir 17361 Mira Loma Cir 17362 Mira Loma Cir Huntington Bh CA 92647-6149 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6149 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6149 APN: 110-342-30 £a* APN: 110-342-31 £a* 3 Lyman D. Taylor Burney P. Tate f 5 17372 Mira Loma Cir 17382 Mira Loma Cir �� Huntington Bh CA 92647-6149 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6149 APN: 110-342-33 fa* APN: 110-342-38 fa* 1�J��-1L�3°I at�-, David E. Wilson William G. Campbell W 17402 Mira Loma Cir 17401 Encino Cir Huntington Bh CA 92647-6149 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6237 APN: 110-342-40 ✓ fa* APN: 110-342-41 fa* APN: 110-342-42 / fa* Paul G. Wood William H. Small Jr. Nicolas P. Mora 17381 Encino Cir 17371 Encino Cir 17361 Encino Cir Huntington Bh CA 92647-6137 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6137 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6137 APN: 110-342-43 fa* / APN: 110-342-44 fa* APN: 110-342-45 V-- fa* Kenneth Roy Cotr Runzel V Michael E. Williams Sherman Wayne L. Wiley 17362 Encino Cir 17372 Encino Cir 17382 Encino Cir Huntington Bh CA 92647-6137 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6137 Huntington Bh CA 92647-6137 i . 110-342 -32 Merij , Cameron TR Personal & Confidential 1503 S. Coast Drive Ste. Costa Mesa, CA 92626 100 kP 110w331-09 110-34237 Bascoy, Loren K2 TR Margolis, David G. Azabdaftari, Kalbiz 17421 Encino Circle 6361 Athena Dr. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 AP 7165-101-46 Ali Ostovarpour AP 110-342-36 6531 Shenlyn Drive Grillo, Louis TR 17441 Encino Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92647- 3k" i : 5645 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 AP 165-103--04 110-342-37 De B. Swenson Margolis, David G. 1514 Alta Glen Drive 17421 Encino Circle Towers n3 Huntington Beach, CA 92647:-- San Jose, CA 95125 165-103-14 110-342-28 Pasquale F. Pirri Saylor', Lucille 17381 Kristopher Lane Hubert, Martin Huntington Beach, CA 92647 17361 Mira Loma Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92647 AP 110-344-05 \, James Woodall 6442 Santa Ynez Drive Huntington . Beach, CA 92647 5'J AP 110-344-11 Waldron, Harvey H. 17402 Madera St. Huntington Beach, CA 92647: -loci 4e,Y)d�P_nt NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING / BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH /-i 9- 9� NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday, February 5, 1996, at 6:30 PM in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following planning and zoning item: ❑ 1. ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE HOLLY-SEACLIFF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (NO. 90-1) - COMPLIANCE REPORT: Applicant: City of Huntington Beach Request: Review the Holly-Seacliff Development Agreement No. 90-1 - Annual Compliance Report. Location: Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan Area Project Planner: Robert Franklin ❑ 2. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 150711CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-72/ VARIANCE NO. 95-16/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 95-8 (APPEAL): Applicant/Appellant: Broadmoor Homes Southwest, Inc. - Request: To appeal the Planning Commission's approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 15071, Conditional Use Permit No. 95-72, Variance No. 95-16 and Negative Declaration No. 95-8 for a 17 lot subdivision for purposes of developing 17, one (1) and two (2) story single family residential units. Conditional Use Permit No. 95-72 includes the request to construct an approximately ten(10) foot high block wall, up to four (4) feet of which is retaining wall, along Edwards Street. Variance No. 95-16 is a request to allow a wall on Edwards Street in lieu of a five (5) foot wide landscape area required by code.. Location: 17301 Edwards Street (west side of Edwards Street, 600 feet north of Slater Avenue). Project Planner: Mary Beth Broeren NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item(s) #1 is covered by Final Environmental Impact Report No. 89-1., No further action is necessary. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that initial environmental assessments for the above items .vere processed and completed in accordance with the California Quality Act. It was determined that Item(s) #2, with mitigation, would not have any significant environmental effects and that a mitigated negative declaration is warranted. These environmental assessments are on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, and are available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community Development Department,or by telephoning(714) 536-5271. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City Clerk's Office, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be Available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office after February 1, 1996. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in I I (cc1g10205) r .Ugal Notification for February 5, 1996 Anci)Meeting Page 2 this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to,the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning Division at 536-5271 and refer to the above item. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714)536-5227 t f\ {cclgl0205) . ................ ................ REQUEST FOR LATE SUBMITTAL OF RCA Department: ( � RCA Title C lo Council Meeting Date: 2 5 C)ce Date of This Request: 9(p REASON (Why is this RCA being submitted late?). I � EXPLANATION (Why is this RCA necessary to this agenda?): <'<> CONSEQUENCES How shall delay of this RCA adversely impact the City?): . . Si ture: O Approved O Denied Approved O Denied Initials :< Required Dep4oWent Head Ram Silver Michael Uberua a -: I- Request for Late Submittal Requests for Council Action (RCA's) are due and considered late after the City Administrator's deadline which is 5:00 P.M. Wednesday ten days prior to the Council meeting at which the item is to be heard. This deadline reflects the time needed prior to Agenda Review for Administration staff and the City Administrator to review all RCA's and their support material prior to forwarding them to the City Clerk for placement on the preliminary agenda. It also provides time for the City Clerk's office to review the item and add proper wording for the item to the preliminary agenda for discussion at Agenda Review the following Monday. The Request for Late Submittal form provides a vehicle for RCA's to be submitted after the Wednesday, deadline when there are extenuating circumstances .which delayed the item and when action on the item is necessary at the.upcoming Council meeting. Late items can agendized only with signed authorization on the Request for Late Submittal form by the Assistant City Administrator or the City Administrator. - RCA OUTING AiEET . INITIATING DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: Appeal of Tentative Tract Map No. 15071/Conditional Use Permit No. 95- 72/Variance No. 95-16/Negative Declaration No. 95-8 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: February 5, 1996 RCA ATTACHMENTS STATUS ... .. _ .... ... Ordinance (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Not Applicable Resolution (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Not Applicable Tract Map, Location Map and/or other Exhibits Attached Contract/Agreement (w/exhibits if applicable) (Signed in full by the City Attorney) Not Applicable Subleases, Third Party Agreements, etc. (Approved as to form by'City Attorney) Not Applicable Certificates of Insurance (Approved by the City Attorney Not Applicable Financial Impact Statement (Unbudget, over $5,000) Not Applicable Bonds (If applicable) Not Applicable Staff Report (If applicable) Attached Commission, Board or Committee Report (If applicable) Not Applicable Findings/Conditions for Approval and/or Denial Attached . .. .. EXPLANATION FOR MESSING ATTACHMENTS; . REVIEWED RETURNED;; FORWARDED;; . .... . ... . ......... .. Administrative Staff Assistant City Administrator Initial dotj City Administrator Initial City Clerk EXPLANATION FOR RETURN OF ITEM. SpaceOnly) ,v