Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Conditional Use Permit 76-27 - SIGNAL LANDMARK INC - 68 uni
Affidavit of P !cation sate•of (%Ilfornia Court of.Orange ss Cit• jf Huntington Beach I eorge Farquhar, being duly sworn on oath, says: That he is L.citizen of the United States, over the age of twenty-one years. That tie is the printer and publisher of the Huntington Beach News, a weekly newspaper of general circulation printed and pub• lished in Huntington Beach, California and circulated in the said County of Orange and elsewhere and published for the dissemination of local and other news of a genera! character, and has a bona fide sutx•rription list of paying subscribers, and said paper has been established, printed and published in the SMte of California, and County of Orange, for at least one year next before the publication of the first Insertion of this notice: and the said newspalx.,r is not devoted to the interest of, or published for the entertainment of any particular crass, profession, trade, calling, race or denomination. or any number thereof. p„b :�l,;M pub;H .per The Huntington Beach New was adjudicated a legsl newspaper ),'-ts10 iJ,;,_ of Meral circulation by Judge C. K. Scovel in the Superior Court t I Rrt±� t� NttilAlN� t : of Onuige County, California August 27th. 1937 by order No. A•5931. tX.; .AJa►ttbYAYyL�� That the ______,pp_-E I,- TO APPROVAL �_. ,C `t 'Coe i�. to CONDITIONAL U E PERMIT NQ- _7b--27_. 14iintf `rt: tea►it�7* untfn q�pn�rsK.it ♦�Ol�ll,' of which the annexed is a printed copy, was published in said nenews- aJA, Ofi- �+tgh,•d6y 'Yn61K, one t? Issue e u C ,voa&t tar dk i•s iW o toy its t4 Plan. paper at least __ � �i*;Cbndi-jM i ,use'f*r► foci the►ocmt ilivas commencing from the .,.9�_ day of �e �n bgr _ Maht 14dkk ft of 11rwo KM r' .n&n ",t?rdtpat;os.0 "fiM'•sub. D l et>trtwft an''tho soutt►'ftde 19?.16—. and ending on the nth day of _..1De CP[3hP r -Yaw I Vimu .?awwaktm i ti.14M 1L was ef,M Wuhd 71MiOm p% nj (�+:dtrrrit•�':+dJly�RMidNAtit.tsiflrktl. 1973 both days inclusive. and as often during said period and 4 •� �' h`01i ��!;in trig 1� pl,�rnlirfr,AfpMr►t�rMllit; •r ' ' times of publication as said paper was regularly issued, and In the Att'Yni�eait'..Owsa+s•rae to regular and entire Issue of said pewspaper proper, and not in a i a:tcriii 'sue:lr+rrti� tt d Lass tsee supplement, and said notice was published therein on the following caln{orii fo}°t 3rist'M�d.spPNb.��- thin fithrrr'iit.en .gory'big.abtsl"14-bum dater, to-wit: Ihv'O#Md t 1ft'Clhi Cline: dATM tlii*pimt�4i7 -II�. : ' << publisher Subscribed and sworn to before me thus 10t 1 _ day of Tae c A mhe r 19-_-a ►i.z,i. L, �. c,-L E<t- Notary Public J Orange County, California ;----------- - _ 7HOMAS D. WYiLIE `4. lVole,y Fubl�c•C�f�lorn�• 1 \` � My Ca"miuion Eapir�i i 153 63-72 : 153-063�-79 153-032-40 ✓' 8321 8321 Y Yo P xlain Jain S �c �� al He�i oW D Martin Jr. ` h Av�wre 8241 Y� AV== .. , 8162 Burnt Circle Cal+ t ftach, Calif I tgtmn HM&21' C-Al.if 92646 92646 153-063-73 +� L�3•.80 ✓� 153-a32-4�, «' P'ranc:Ls BMW � K eecr m zma e W "O.Zle iste r .830 Ycw Av+er�ae 1 kfi�rn i i s]w 8192 Bu=heeu circla Beach, Calif , C014 Be-*'jh Calif 39648 92646 92646 i.�3•-0�3-�4 �'' I Rbe¢'t C Metz 153~032-41 ..- IS3-032-36 ✓' t $291 Yet Avenue Sues Ilia Edwin A.Burkitt } 8171 buiibm t L=U 8141 "IMMI K* circle kmt1gjtcn Beach, Calif vt Beach, Call Huntington Bemc h r Calif 92646 92646 92646 _ �. G�Austin 153-032-22 153-032-37 R*ft"t-x "W'Onhom P&ymmd L HmtW 8281 Yaaddxxwn Avane Biel SAMOM Circle 8142 Wenlock Circle Beach.biitbigtm Calif H►mtj t-O Wn Bewh+ Cali Beach, Calif 92646 92646 92646 f 153-063-•76 A' 1.53-032-23 v" 153-032-43 ✓ $Y L Tbo " lMr Nu ilyn S Holt et al 8081 Bo1 a Av+arme 9191 DWOM C izz " 8132 W,mlo* Circle Midr ay Catty, CA 92655 MBeach, Calif Hunti,txlbm Beach Calif 92646 ". 92646 153-032-24 153-091-02 ✓ asparJy Goorge Jue 8201 Bu=ihm Citcle 1820-Y. Vista 8t ` Wngt march, Crtlif Ios Angeles, Calif 92"6 90046 N., M-032--25 ✓ 153-091-03 Jemmy H `eis Sylvia S let am 82U BUM*M circle 8092 Yorkt m Amum Ham, Calif Hmt.ington Reach,, r-,h1.if 92646 92646 153-M-77 153-032--26 153-•091-04 Jamm L Throw P ' Marian E Sall&% $261, Yaarrtcm •Avwcw 82-2 Dombo% CNircIa 8062 Yowlcbom Avenue jiunt9Yx;tranbdonh, CoU Huntiafbm Beach, Cali-f Hmtinytcrn Boachr C2L1if 92646 92646 92646 1530063-7p 153-�032-49 ✓ 1�53-091-05 ✓ Patrick K Holano mgm &rAw Piet commmies The 8551 Yet Mar..ae 8172 cstc. 19542 Inn i ch Alva t°ler*ingtm Beach+ Calif ash such, MIJ Rvtln#m beach, Cali 92646 92"15 92646 i solo Uor Top it °r" d.vas 11432 9� • I . f II Huntington Beach Planning Commission P.ta. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 TO: Honorable Miiyor and City Council FROM: Planning Com n. ssion DATE: December 15, 1976 ATTN: Floyd G. Belsi.;:o, City Administrator RE: Conditional Use Permit No. 76-27 : Appeal to Approval Appellant: Marilyn S. Holt E132 Wenlock Circle Huntington Beach, California 92646 A.pplic.ant: Signal Lanclmark Inc. 17890 Skypark Circle Irvine, California 92714 E. Location: South side of Yorktown Avenue, west of Newland Street Request: To permit the construction of a 68 unit planned residential �- development Planning Commission Action: ON MOTION. BY SLATES AND SEC-)ND BY SHEA CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 76-27 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS BY THE Fr`",LOWING VOTE: AYES: Finley, Gibson, Slates, Shea, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: P"rkinson Findings: 1. The proposed project of the 12. 2 acre parcel. of land zoned R2 (which . . allows 14. 5 units per gross acre) is proposed to be constructed having o,tly 5. 6 units per acre. 2. The General Plan has set forth provisions for this type of land use as well as sett3.ng forth objectives for implementation for this type of housing. 3. The property was previously st�?Yed for this intensity of land use at the time the land use designation for: medium denaity residential was placed on said property,, 4. The parcel sire, depth, frontage, .street widths,. and all other design and improvements features oZ the proposbd project 'are proposed to be constructed in compliance with standard plans and specifications on file with the City, as well as - in compliance with the State � eap and supplementary City Subdivision' ordinance. Coriditi.on Use Permi;� No. 76-27 Appeal Page 2 Planning Commission Recommendation: The Planning Commission recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 76--27. Summary Analysis: i Conditional Use Permit No. 76-27 is a request for a 68 unit planned residerst.l.al development on a 12. 2 acre parcel of land located on the south EAe of Yorktown Avenue between Beach Boulevard and Newland Street. The parcel was created through the approval oaf. Tentative P g PP Tract Map 7742 by the Planning Commission on June 23, 1976. The.. .,-ioject will provide for 25 two bedroom units and 43 three bedroom units with an over--all density of 5. 6 units per gross acre (the R2 permits a maximum density of 14 . 89 units per gross acre. ) In addition the development will provide open space and recreational amenities as required by City Ordinance. The Planning Commission Sudivision Committee held a review with the applicant: at its meeting of October 21, 1976. The Committee suggested sore minor revisions and recommended approval of the project to the Planning Commission. The Commission ultimately approved the development at its meeting of November 16, 1976. Subsequent to this approval, an appeal was filed on behalf of a number of property owners to the north of the subject parcel. The specific basis of the appeal was the fact that the property was an existing archaeological site and that the traffic study information contained in the project' s EIR is outdated and invalid. The Staff has attached for the Council' s review an archaeological report that was conducted on the site by Archaeological Research Inc. The conclusion and recommendation of the report (page 17) states that the site is heavy in shell depos-Lts but contains few artifacts and therefore is no reason to ;: romote preservation of the site through further work or inspection. (Please refer to the attached report. ) In regards to the traffic concerns expressed by the appellant, the staff has determined that the traffic consultant who prepared the study was the recommended consultant by the City' s Traffic Engineer. The study was performed on the assumption of the property' s zoning and resulting developemnts and thus does provide a valid traffic analysis. (Refer to attached EIR information. ) Additional Information: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed development at its meriting of November 16, 3.976. Mr. Irwin Hayclock, a member of the Environmental Council, addxassed the 'Commissiall and expressed concerns about the project insofar as schools are concerned and the point of access onto Yorktown Avenue. Virginia Parson addressed the Commission and discussed aspects of the archaeological significance of Conditional Use permit No. 76--77 Appeal ` .Page� 3 of the site. George Stringer, representing the applicant, addressed the Commission and spoke in favor of the project. Environmental Status: EIR 74-12 was approved by the Environmental Review Board on April 22, 1975. This report was subsequently transmitted to the Planning Commission and City Council and approved by both bodies. (A copy of the Board' s transmittal is attached for the Council ' s information. ) Su2porting Information: 1.. Area Map 2. Staff Reports 3. Archaeological Report 4 . Traffic Analysis of EIR 74-12 6. Letter of Appeal. Respec full 'submitted, dward D. Selich Acting Director EDS:JMC: s I ` .. ry Y OF tMW[Ti��i�C��3E.AClt �E�� `f .' ' s. '+:�.� ,• `' . a i�'a ' • Ma7�i], 9. halt , J I s�'��'.- Ph .3 ., . .8132 Wehlock Circle H�:nt3ngton Deoh, Ca. 4z646 November 30, 1976 Hapr.. Harriett Wi4der City .bf.'Hnntinffton Beach Huntington Beach, California DeiAr Mayor Wieder= On behalf. of Vaelf and my neighbors, we Kish to protest the decision of the plar,.-ting Commission in regard to case number 76-27 Signal Landmark Development. specifically, we feel the decision as regard to development of the bluff area along Yorktown is not in the beat interests of the Mty of Huntington Beach. Construction of the bluff area would destroy an existing archeological site and one of tho ft.-areas of natural beauty remaining in Huntington Beach. We also feel that the data from the 1973 traffic study used in the EM is outdated and the conclusion regarding traffic congestion is invalid. i1e, therefore, request a public hear'kng be hold before your body to allow us to more fully present our case agai:iat this decision. Sincerel,Y> >> r ces Eriv'i.ronmental Council ; Historical Society Archeological Sdci.ety :Wet W got Moo /, 7� " lthliah 12/9/76 PI1pCCCiX 15S .s� 11 rICE is 1Dx �3IV= that a p 6llc hearing will be hfld by tier _ E City Council of the City oaf wmtlo#toa Beach, in . the Council ` Ch r of the Civic Center, Smtirgton Brach, at the hour of 7; pomp. . or of goon tloreaftar of poeaible, on may the Zorn dayof >aerearbex , 19 76 . for the Purpose of 4 ca�tidelin* an appeal to the approval by the City Planning Commiss;on of Conditional Use Permit No. 76-27 to allow the conctruction of a 68 unit planned residential devrelopsent pursuant to Article 931 of the Huntington Beach ordinance Code. The subject property in located on the south side of Yorktovn Avenu4 r approximately 1400 ft. westerly of Newland Street in they R2 (Medium Density Residential District) . ' ' A legal description is on file in the Planning Departsent Office. . I - 1k } ';All, interef ted pe►ra004 are i*Vtt*d to attoW said Marina and suprorr their oplal+a A for or -Wint. aaf4 Appeal act r iafatsativu My be . orfiee' of the City • Decer1w 'fie 1976 .�. is it, 1 t"rth x a I JI N; 1 L`"-n.i rrtt►,'� q a. y e*I.kaM-.r �...r,N^ r .ye�M.i•«..., . _or...... - � 'a Number. of 'Excerpts 65 Publish Once NOTZCZ. 146TICkOor' PUBLIC `HMING CONDITIoNAI, USE PERMIT No. 76-27 NOTICE; IS HERESY GIVNI that a =public bearing ..will be held. by the :City Planning Cammisiion of the City of Huntington Beach, California, for the purpose of -considering Conditional Use Permit No. 7 6-2 7 to allow, the construction of a 68 unit planned tin residential development pursuant ,to Article 931�Oeatea onnthegtvn Beach Ordinance Code. The subject property i� .. south sire of Yorktown Avenue, approximately 1400 ft. westerly of Newland description ist in honRfileein thePlanning Bidential Department Office? A legal descz p Said hearing will be held at the hour of 7 :00 P .M. , on NQyg nber U, 1976 , in the Council Chambers Building of the Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed ondital. ,Usk Permit Na. 76-27 , Further. information may be obtained from the City Planning _ Department. Telephone No. (714) 536-5271 DATED this 4th day of November, 1976 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION By Eduard D. Selich Acting Secretary 11 lMtl,j �,► !lilt. cop in t� r irY ca bob ►s Ott wiid�[► �it� �r!'�Mtatin�a" �nr+rb ' OutSuCton Jsrohr C i rrwas . Der lMpr %Kok&$ Grp behaU of golf #ad Mp xM or' " xiai to poot"t the doclAon of the PUrAdal to "PA to am* satire �p.aoifioal],f, nos togs!. tiro &iUL" oa is@". is develaposnt of tube bluff area also IoeittM to not In the wat WAN- rto' of the City► of N=tingt . Dneh. OemotmWe of Uw ►tf stoma �Ld doetror an eodatonini arohrolwrgl.eral Site apt am of the foe arras of aoatwral b"Str r mining to Sauft'Mo #rase. We aloe feel that the data Bart t* IM trafrio otad r used in the fllt tooutUtad snd the � trafi'io oondestion is invalid. We, therefore, regvmt a pabUa kumin; be Wil beftre your boo to allay us to tore fully pmant over osae andnat thin decision. 9inw►rly, ,�` . obi .11`AhYi2"oAnental Cowell I3tstorioal 9octvt, Aroheologioal 9eariety 44 . 30 " Aw y ,. .. .. _, .r '.r ..-!. rrl:at+wnrt►I4.YMy�RwAt�+.yw-s.... �n.y�)+.r•. ..y_ _ . .• •..'�`�.�••1,1t••r••.rrs•e.. . .•r•••r•►:•t•:••i••1••1{t•••••{•••••♦1••of•t•••••1•••t•..:•11••••t•..••••f•/•••••■••r.•I••1••r•r••• 15a 9 . .. 153-034�-20. 153-032-34 ;..19C9t�l + A driaAw : Tom Land . BlW 19451 WordWiter lard Wmlcack C rc.le. Hun Beach,, Cali 92 Aitirqtan Ba d, CalifHUintt,3.txgtoc: Beach a Claif 92647 6_ ••1•f 1/••(.••t.1 ►•f•••1••••♦ •►....too f•••.•./•{t•{{•1 1•{►••..••1••••t•••*Ott r 1•••f•••••••••.t.♦••..••,t••••r•••t••♦f to,... •••i/ '. 153-051-10 153-034-21• 153--032-35 . . ed L P%xt . R Mevricxtand Howard M Weiske. 1919 N- 442 19471 Whzt eter LW* 8131 Wwaock Circle swita Ana, 92701 Hu yt it gton Beach, Calif Hunt.irx tan Beach, Calif 92646 92646 • r �_ ••r•1•.•••••••••• ttf,1••N••f•rrtl•t■••.•••t••t••t••••It•{•••t1t•••1••••It11,•11,••11t••t•t,{t•tt•t••t•••1•r!•••1,.•r•••••t••• 153-051--11 1:53-032--191 153-032-39 Don Jose is Inc � E Ahines Hiroshi D Hamm& Jve t+lar j 19392 Wrjvatth 1w a 8122 Wenl ock Circle 9093 Avenue Hwtingt on Head, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif wi i ' ' B63ch, lif 92646 92646 : 92646 ...s.. -•. •t•••••••••r•• •r••,••••/•tt•►•••/t••••.11.•11.1••{••C111t•••r11•••••t•t/.t•1r•at••1r•••1t•Y••,0444•••1,1•{1••1.11••• r • 153"0 -13 153-032-20 • G Trabant R J Morgeatander 807 Av"nue 8161 Bu=lam Circle Huai Beach, Wi Hwtingtc n Each, Calif 9 6 92646 � .t••r.•/.•••.•••••.r .. .. .•.•• •••••••••••I.1..•••••••,r••r••t••••••••••/••.•••r•.r.r••••.•••fs••I•Yr..•■•••,.•••.!••••••••♦ 153-034-15 153-032-30 Ra1*, V Del Mare Ivan a i.11eon 19391 meter Lame : 8162 Burnham Circle h a3ti•ngtan &3ach, Calif Huntington Beach,, Calif 92646 92646 ...•,�,.... .., , •....•...••s.r .... ••.•►■•••••..t1•Itt•••i•1./•••e•.r•t••••r•f/••••••.r•••••r•••••/••r•••••r•t•st►•1. Y••••tt tt•• 153-034-1160 153-032-31 Lola D Elliott Suzanne Durkee 19411 Warc tmter Lane 8142 Burnham Circle awch, Calif Huntin;tan Beach, Calif 92646 92664 60044. ../ . . . . r .1••••t•\••• • .. •. .a.r•.!•!. .1•/.••••••••••••♦•1 1••••••••••••••••••...••s•a.►.•••.r.•1 1••••1{■•,•t•••f I 1►••••••Y 153�034-17 153-032-32 Arleen k Rath : Lelm-A ? UvrArd 19421 Wordh mAar Lame 8132 Btunhwm Circle mtington beach,, Calif Hantirxgtm Bemkch, Calif 924A6 92646 •/.1.1•••.•t••0•••••.•• ••..•... .•. .••••••■•■.•.••••.t•••••••••••.•••.•./••.•••1•••••..••••r••• 1•.....••►•••. /►l1. 1••••Y . ...••• t • � 153-034-18 153-032-33 ; And& Maraz Gexge E Holtz 1031 Wbtdx*ter Larne 8122 Burnham Cirlcm Ti�ntirx3tan Berate, Calif Hmtjngtvn Beach, Calif 92646 . . ..110..1tY.4 . . /•..••,.. ......•..••••••••.w.•••,t•ir••1•.t•••••••••••••••••.r•.•••�•••f••••/,•••••►,••••.►•r1.1rYrI.Y►•,••t1{• 153-034-19 153-032-33 e v Brown Gwap H Boltz 19441 motes- Lane 6122 Wagm Circle Huntington Beach, Calif HmtL-V= Aeach1, Calif : 92646 92646 •{••�{t.tt••t1•f•1••t•r{•t1••••.i•rr•I rt•t••• •r••••{•..0 0 &de •r •,•••i1i.00011 •.r•a►••Poo Y • • t , t 1-502-24 B tly A r M Limwdy 8 Scdrodd r Carl` liardrprism 8 1 amt4pwt w Carps zar P:O. Boat 4349 Calif BeRiCh Calif Anobsim, Calif 9UO3 92 92 i IM-01-07 2-►25 Wl, el Tmo SIT Jrc Vi 4DiA I Powell au Dew 20051 Cape fay 1Wl Ventura Blvd. Suite 21(s a • Cal J tz , Calif f amino, Calif 91316 92646 92646 15'�-091-08 •�' 151--5E1,1 151- 26 Htartl.--O-ftZ 7r c d' tr]ar 1" mac' 1l i' Loilmsm Tim epxts 2M2 (:::Ik� Iaaee 20041 Tana � j 4W5 lac=t Ct. Suite A tr call , Calif son Dd ecw, Calif 92113 92" 92646 i ' !4M 61-03 1.51-501 151-502-27 C=ty ccntmi nudxwt .. Denis E 20052 ' f" 20042 N Britain fans 1078 , Ca3.if Mutt , C&Uf Santa Ana= 92"6 92646 � 151--2 -04 151 %1 1.51-502 8 Zolla► Bert John A =i 1105 V Drive 20062 lane 20062 New ta.in lane SantA I Beach C 031 Ca.Uf 92R6 92646 92646 251-504- 1 151--501 0 151.. -29 ich, W skint M mr1wo" A S 8341 Drive Z0072 C otba?e am 1560 Ave beach, Calif am Bit, LCM , call 92646 92646 908 151-504- 151- 2-30 i. Donald W 3 Pt+ Burik D Henidw 8331 Drive 20082 Cottane 200 2 N Now Brf lane i Calif HunLiz Batch, f Aaach, W•if 92646 92646 92 6 151- 3 151- 2-22 -502--31 F Ct w rizey it -Pacific 833J. Drive 20081 Cape Cot� 5 W Mac Acdr 1W ` bon , Calif Beret, mosa, C 3if 2626 ? 9 9 LU- -04 M 502-23 151-502-33 H Aryer C.ttttarn ivag Nbal Guma t Lus 20021 N Calif 1 � f tiew f fiew*4 Cali 9t' ' 6 92 92646 i rY t 1 ,` t Wi Blvd 7 mi� • f w1.f.'4j 4il.ivcwwwmi Blvd ow #, CI1 92644 �• - I .T ' ' 3 � II Dor eta Ar�w -- , • . loch. C 42 4 92444k . .''' t x•r ,t. r Beach, Calif 926#6 �! � 936+�6 9�+�6 VW sa umma Drive - erwch Cal it 1376" OAlif 92W U Aatate 1 _! , , � 19711 MXWWX Ls •Y DOLISS d DCLVw - 9 6+16 et�ai�c3 iaw Calif k Dom, Calif 9ab46 • it ;: .I r'•.. r' 'y •t r r. 'f It Nwifto Note" LNW lwl,ltrr Der / 916r Qt1.l t 6 • ` . . j f 31 c�h GLlif 92fr#i ' r L" l wld . � � 4 .MA 153�Q8# -06 ✓ Elre .t M Jaian CL K 'lsma Jr err* P Bpri-a .t 8472 Gilford CYLrU 19-M madlom Law 8252 Polk C'3ZO1a Doubt Cali .De cho MI" 1 ern Bssc3h, calif 92646 9?ri4i 92646 153--08"7 lid-fts-16 ✓ 1.53-463�-64,e. LO mtd M PtIgm llaLOoLa X AU Hoy Sri m Z Nelson 8471 YWftm Avr a s 1%71 Vw"",a lam 83dn H Hal"m Beach, Calif Mta an Somob, CeIJ Rt 3 Haas 3Qh 92646 92646 t odc, Calif 92028 253-084-08 IS3-461-17 ✓ 15.E-063 65 '''� 8461 Yorktoa Ava mm 1%32 fang Iam 93" Hiskin Ave spur tiAgtan Dsech, calif oksungbmi Heel, Cali Pa=b fn M&Usyt C RUf 97546 92646 92708 E 1 "31 Yorktown Avaim 1%52 MrdiN lam 8282 Palk CL=lro Ham, Calif eb, 11 Bosch, cull Beau, Colt 92646 92646 92646 153-084-10 153-M-19 Oe 153-063-67Loi ✓ 1eSal l Id sb ny 19462 �Imm 812.2 Wah l HMOU 82 ock Circle (i La C'ormdm, Calif awlisg'tiats Deerch, Calif. Huntington Beach,, Cn3.1.t 91011 92646 92646 153-084--U "�� 153-#1-20 153-063-68 David M amlee m ill C t9aith z 8401 Yorktown Avmw 19472 Hudkq Lwa 833022 Polk CLrcle j I3itington Beacht Calif I#a ngto Baer h, Calif HmtJngtm Beam, calif 92646 92646 92646 153-084-12 `'� 1-0063-60 600 ' 153-063-69 0-' Caben � 839�1 Ya�urkfirown��e,�e 8�2.�1Po�icvgccy D Circle 83ZZ P�aUcR GiscLe i Hmtirjgton Beach, Calif Head, Calif Hmtfngtm Beach, Calif 92646 92646 92646 163-085-13 153-063-70 FednW E J+eraLngs auvw k o A Rives+► Jam J Hass 19431 teAuven Imw 8232 Palk Circle 8332 Polk CircLi Huntir:7tari Bewach, Calif lamdngtm Ha tick, CLUf RMLInom B"d4I Ca3.f.f 92646 92646 92646 153-G8-c-14 ,✓ ✓ lS3-063-71 John L wze J01,110 C 1111010rx�rk#e was P Parsons 19441 Hortmon L" 14522 Vdlsm Street 8331 Yoorktcvn Avre m l8a Ungton Breach, Calif MI&W Cif', C of "tx►Umton Be+each, Calif 92646 926,i' S 92646 ta CE3 -GILFORD r'- WE Rl ! \ ••w _ Q fORKTOWN ti L t � , C2 R1 t z A , ice. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO . 76-27 ZONE R2 - ._ KU*ra6r0* REACH PLANNING DE". ♦ ' c_% 3 '.�`+ _� t`_..T`�`^";.' ♦ t +� , � ;t%:Vz.� -- - ,w:4 yam• `� �`�l - rr � Y �L ��` ` - J � � a.'�s l M w. ',� l a. A�rf i.-_���•q Tt At !•t�� Y- ,` r � �', 1 ��•\ ,\ ..�. `•'it �`� f 1, . .t � L �`�i ; - 1. =t. S' -Vim• 1 +- f., ( 'f. �• WL HAS rL• � _ J t \ \\!' •t' w� Cam'�' ww..,� +� 1 1/` Y �: r •/ \t l♦, ,{` fir•=r,, r `'•i;,f(f f! • ' \t,�;.: r I •f ,e {4, wFt ' \\+ . �.��.. ,..,,:�_�-✓ ��� �L4J n�~ t �' � y�.,• ''•/'• s` 1 1�i77�iJ � � ' � t 1 ';J� �_— :�, _ +� �.; � ,-mac; ,_. • /j 1.• ,�, •�, j�+j, i1 t, * }� i��' iLi -cW�lt�.��ta[7 �MMIwLN[L ic�C 1 t• ✓4 •� C,/f t,'- ! f L' ro ��• 9'-O'}ti[1t RtAR \ ►' � `��_�' j � f'tA �T�L Wrts (��:n�"'os.�i xs:`'�•w*s .,�_--__._...-_ .. • �� •v r - /'` rye-r+aataievty`:S�.:a�wtwr•�y.:.!-?t�G.s )i f � �• yy � // ti� mKet►(2:�••G.R.cs) ' ` w~�— y, / �•t 9) Orin Gh r.Ak%G sky *` fry// 223 DfY!MK/N.1.aAmp M A r I � � �\ � le,a.a�.,r�-wt.•.avwsv..•1M. •.__.-, f d Jr•� tt .•.s REACH r r•' *0-nwa_r iY+i�wa14 mw..!.rt. xe.t+oN �,�. E�Et'►CH / `' PT Dc 1976t • f Q. Sox 290 ::n Beach, CA 92648 spol ''Plalining ,commission FROM: ""Planning Department � . DATES 'November 17 ' 1976 COND1TIONA ;USE PERMIT NO. .'.76-27 Date Filed: Sept. 281 1916 j Applicant: Signal Landm:-k' Iinc. : 1.7890. "Sky Park Circle Irvine, Calif. 92714. Location. South side of Yorktown Ave. , West of Newland Street Request:. To permit the construction of a 68 unit.•planned residential development 1. 0 'Gene Information The.!,propvsed 68 obit,, 12 . 2 acre planned residential development is .."an• integral: part of the total 103. 9 acre, Tentative Tract 7742. There ,was not. specific layout for a planned devel©pment "on the orginally approved map. Tentative Tract 7742 was approved by the Planning Coinmission on June 23, 1976 as a 389 Rl lots and 1 A2 lot. Thio .proposed . 6a unit planned residential development is a comb-nation• of .25. two bedroom units and 43 three bedroom unit- . The density for this•,project :equals 5. 6 units per gross acre; perm. tted in the R2 , Medium Density Residential is 14. 5 units per gross acre. Parking for the "proposed. project equals 3. 25 spaces per unit, 2 space garage per unit plus 1. 25 open spaces per unit. Required parking is 3. 25 apaces per unit. Recreational amenities provided for in the proposed project include . a pool and clubhouse in addition to a 10, 000 sq. ft. common recreation area. Private patios are provided for at the ratio of 250 sq .ft. per : each 2 bedroom unit and 300 sq. ft. per each 3 bedroom unit. M . Present Land Use and 2oninq. Th( subject, property is ,zoned R2, 'Medium Density Residential, and is presently vAcant of . development. The property lracated to the north is: zoned -P-11,: Low Density Residential .•nd• is developed as such. Located to the east and south of. the 'stiibject, property,, " the zoning is �t1'`end' 3.s presently 'being developed :as the., low aensity tesidentf al portion.:of Tentative Tract. 77.42 i•% -The::pro ' ity' located to •the west is zoned C2, Community ar:c "R5 , .Qtfce- ►rofes$ional. Staffpo:rt. Conditional Use Permit No. 76-27 P agz '2 The. RS- area i.s presentl'y developed with several single family dwellings with the remaining C2 area presently vacant of development. 3.0 History: The original Tentative Map 7742 .was filed with the City on February 10, 1972, however, as the City Wes interested in preserving a portion of the bluff in its natural condition as retell as obtaining property for drainage through the area , the item was tabled indefinitely at the request of the applicant for the City to study the area and prepare environmental documents thereon, and to reach an agreement upon the acreage to be set aside for each of these facilities. The City entered into an agreement with Signal Landmark on December 12 , 1972, for the property to be set aside. On April, 15 , 1974 , the City Council adopted Resolution 3873 which sets forth the agreement with Signal Landmark, Inc. and the City on the preservation of a 19 acre park as well as a ten acre stc,rm drain facility over the Marshland at the bottom of the ..bluff line. Subsequent to this agreement being adopted by the City 'Cuuncil, the developer. again initiated processing of the map by request- ing that an Environmental Impact Report be prepared and processed for this project. At the termination of the environmental process, the developer filed this revised tentative map which you have before you for review. 4. 0 General Plan: The Land Use Element of the General Plan has subject property designated for medium density on this portion being proposed for the one 12 lot acre planned development. With the adoption of Ordinance 1989 by the City. Council for a minor zone boundary adjustment along the northerly boundary of the proposed subdivision , this project will be in compliance with specific and general plans for the area. 5. 0 Environmental Starus : On April 22, 1975, the Environmental Review Board apprcved Environmental Impact Report No. 74-12 for Zone Change 74--18 and Tentative Tract 7742. The ERB recommendatiors to minimize the impact from accumulative develop- merits of this nature are contained in the ERB transmittal attached herewith. The final environmental impact report was distributed to the Planning CoMission for its review and adoption at the May 6, 1975 meeting at which time the Planning Commission approved Zone Change 74-=18. 6. 0 Subdivision Committee: The Subdivision Committee held a review with the developer on this . . portion of Tentative Tract 7742 at the Octo)�er 21, 1976 meeting. _ - Following are the itcxms discussed ►pith .the :developer at that meeting. 6. 1, The Committee .request:e d that the''plai� subrciitted to the Planning Commission indicate' t:he relati.onhip *Uf the proposed westerly drive access on Yorktown Avenue to any existing' access, points across Yorktown and to any drives into subj ct property within 200 feet 'of said access. Staff Report Conditional Use Permit 76-27 Page 3 . 6. 2 The .applicant was informed of the storm drain easement which will be required from Coldwater to Yorktown to be 45 inch REP line. 6. 3 . The 'Committee requested that the Police Department be given authority to enforce parking regulations on the private street within this project. 6A Proposed wall treatments were discussed including treatment of Coldwater and a possible wall between the project and the adjacent City park property. It was determined that th, materials on Coldwater wa.11. .should be the same as those used on the arterials. The applicant teas instructed to consider a blockwall along . the City property, with poter.itial access into the park and have a proposal to present with � possible future locations for pedestrir.,n access indicated on the plan. 6.5 I;evised Map (Received and dated November 1, 1976) . The developer has incorporated the recommendations of the Subdivision Committee into this revised map submitted for your review. 7 . 0 -Recommendation: The Subdivision Commitee and Staff recommends approval of Conditional Use permit 76-27 and offers the following findings and conditions of approval for your consideration . Findings: The Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby 'find that the proposed subdivision, along with its design and improve- ments is consistent with 9 P general and specific plans for the area in that: 1. The proposed project of the 12. 2 acre parcel of land zoned R2 (which allows 14. a units per gross acre) is proposed to be constructed having only 5. 6 units per acre. . 2. The . General Plan has set forth provisions for this type of land use as well as setting forth objectives for implementation for this type of housing. 3. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land. use at the time the land use designation for medium density residential. was placed on said property. 4 . The •parcel size, depth, frontage, street widths, and all other design and impL%-gements features of the 'proposed rroject are proposed to be constructed in compliance with standard Flans r40 specifications On file with the City, as well as in, compliance with the State Map and supplementary City Subdivision 'Ordinance . Staff r- Chi d.itiona1 Use Permit 76-27 Page 4 Suggested Conditions 1. Conditional Use Permit 76 -27 received and dated November 1, 1976 shall be the approved layout. 2. The sewer,. water, and fire hydrant systems shall be designed to City standards . 3. The water system shall. be through the City of Huntington Beach' s water system. 4. The sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington Beach' s sewage system. 5. The property shall be subject to the local drainage aQsessment district requirements and fees . 6. All required improvements shall be constructed under the 'inspection of j and to the approval of the City Engineer, Cost of the inspection shall be paid by the subdivider. 3h percent of the amount of i improvement bond shall be deposited with the City Engineer for inspection cost. 7 . All utilities shall be installed underground, 8 . Drai-range for the subdivision shall be approved by the Department of Public Works prior to the recordation of a final map. This system shall be designed to provide for siltation and erosion control both during and after construction of the proposed project. 9. A decorative masonry wall shall be constructed to City specification along Yorktown and Coldwater. Said wall shall be six inches wide and six feet high, The height of said wall shall be measured from whichever side is higher at finished grade. The architectural design of said wall shall be approved by the Planning Department. The structural design shall be approved by the Department of Public Works and shall be included as a part of the street improvement plans. The intent of this condition is to improve the street scene along Yorktown. 10, Landscape planter area shall be provided at locations along Yorktown and Coldwater Lane as shown on the approved tentative map. Stich plan+-er shall conform . to the plains and specifications on file with the Department of PUblic Works and the requirements of the ?Manning Commigsion. 11. The developer shall install full street improvementa' on Coldwater Lane with- the exception that nc ' sidewalk shall be constructed along the westerly right-of - way lane at this time, 12. A 19 foot set back' tshal l be 'provided from' the ultimate right-of-way of the adjacent arterial }iighways to the living quarters of the units adjacent to such �hisihways. Staff Report . Conditional Use Permit 76-27 Page 5 13. The, structures shall be constructed in compliance with the State acoustical s4a,!dards set forth for multi- or attached units, for all units that lie within the 60 CNEL contours on this property. 14. If the developer proposes to provide air condition, the insulation in ceilings and exterior walls shall be a minimum of R-19 and R-11, respectively. If no ai- conditioning is to be provided, the insulation in ceilings rind exterior walls shall be a minimum of R-13 and R-71 respectively. 15. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an offsite facility equipped to handle them. 16. Natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at the location of cloth-: s dryers. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities , water heaters, and central heating units . 17 . Prior to any additional grading along the westerly property line at the top of the existing slope bank on the proposed project, a qualified archaeologist shall review the area for artifacts , remnants, or burials . M An engineering geologist shall be engaged to submit a report to the City indicating the ground surface acceleration from earth movement for subject property. 19. All structures proposed for construction within this project shall be constructed in compliance with the g-factors as indicated by the engineering geolgist' s report. 20. Calculations for footings and structural members to withstand anticipated g--fac}ors shall be submitted to the City fcr review. 21. A chemical analysis as well as tests for physical properties of the soils on subject property shall be submitted to the City for review prior to the issuance of building permit:. SMB:s �FLRNNING C SSIO"14P 'k'ibmI PLA 'NING DEPARTMENT DATE.* . ~� ' ; JLl2 6 17, 11975 TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 7742 FILING DATE: 5/22/75 SUBDIVIDER: Signal Landmark, Inca ZONE: Rl '.7890 Skypark Circle Irvine, Calif. 92707 GENERAL PLAN: ENGINEER: The Stringer Co . 17890 Skypark Circle Irvine, Calif. LOCATION: Sly. of Yorktown Ave. , Nly. of Adams Ave. , K Wly. of Newland St. ��►ry '' M+K� REQUEST: Subdivision into 387 R-1 lots (Alt. "A") or , 390 R1 Lots (Alt. "B" ) and one R--2 PD lot. , � w i 1. 0 GENERAL INFORMATION: Tentative Tract Map No. 7742 filed on May 22 , 1975 is a request to permit the suWi.vision of approximately 91 . 7 acre Parcel of land into a 399 R-1 subdivision and a 12 . 2 acre lot for a future planned development. Subject property is located on the west side of Nev:land Street between Yorktown Avenue and Adams Avenue. 2 .0 PRESENT LAND USE AND ZONING: Subject property is presently zoned R1 and R2 and is vacant at 'this time. This property had been previously used for agricultural purposes for a number of years prior to the storm channel being constructed in 1974 across, subject property. The properties to the north , east and south are all zoned R1 and developed with single family dwellings . The property to the west is partially e-;�t aside for flood control purposes as . well as a 19 acre park site at the top of the bluff . The one parcel created by lot. 390 as shown upon the subidivision , is zoned R2 and is soi aside fora future planned development. 3 . 0 HISTORY: The original tentative map 7742 was filed, with the City on February 10 , 1972 , however, as the City was intereated in preserving a portion of the bluff in its natural condition an well as obtaining property for drainage through the area, t'he item was tabled indefinitely at the request of the applicant for , the City to study the area and prepare environmental doctmsenta .therms, and to reach 'an agreement upon the acreage to. be set aside fc)r. ; aach 'of these,. facilities . The City entered into an agreement with Signal Landmark 'r 17 4 2 PAID;., TWO . 0n. December .12, 1972 for the property to be set aside. On April 15, 1974 .the City Council adopted Resolution 3873 which sets forth the agreement with Signal Landmark, Inc. and the City on the preservation of a 19 acre j park, as we1J, as a ten acre storm drain facility over the Marshland.. at the hot:toni 'af the bluff line. Subsequent to this agreement being adopted by the City. Couricil, the developer again initiated processing of the map j by requesting that an Environmental Tmpact Report be prepared and processed for this project. At the termination of the environmental process,. the developer filed this revised tentative map which you have before you for review. 4 . 0 GENERAL PLAN: I' The Land .Use Element of the General Plan has subject property designated for low density residential on that portion proposed for the 389 lot Rl development and medium density on that portion being proposed for the one lot 12 . acre future planned development. 'therefore, with the adoption of Ordinance 1989. by the City Council for a minor zone boundary adjustment alongthe northerly boundary of the proposed :subdivision, this project . Y Y will be in compliance with specific and ,general. plans for the area. 5 . 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: On April- 22, 1975 , the Environmental Review Board approved Environmental Impact Report No. 74-12 for (Zone Change 74-18 and Tentative Tract 7742) . The ERB recommendation to minimize the Unpact from accumulative develop- ments 'of this nature are contained in t:.he ERB Transmittal attached herewith. . The , final Environmental Impact Report was distributed to the Planning Commission for its review and adoption at the May 6 , 1975 meeting at which time the Ple—ning Commission approved Zone Change 74-18 . 6A SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE: II The . Subdivision Committee held a review with the developer on Tentative Tract Map 7742 at the June 5, 1975 meeting. Following are the items discussed with the developer at that meeting. I' 6611 The.- Subdivision Committee reviewed the layout and design of two alternative plans submitted by the developer and it was the consensus of the committee that the developer revise his map to facilitate a, lineal separation between the marsh and homes proposed along the westerly portion of the tract through the use of a lineal drive from Yorktown to Adams Avenue. Traffic flow- was discussed on this westerly drive and it was agreed that speeding j co,ild be controlled through the use of stop signs. The developer was instructed to provide typical cutout areas for landscaping along this area to aesthetically improve the wall treatment within for the gear yards of homes along this marsh area. TT 7742' PAGE THREE The Committee then discussed street improvements of this most westerly "A" Street. It was a consensus that such street improvements should nit include a sidewalk area on the westerly boundary of the street at this time. 6 . 2 The requirement for raised medians at all intersections of collectors streets with arterial highways was discussed as well as the use of standard wrought iron at the ends of all cul-de-sacs that stub out to arterial highways . 6 . 3 i The developer was informed that although he was setting aside Lot 390 for possible future planned development that at such time as a proposal is made, it would require subsequent map and conditional, use permit application to be filed for that type of development. i 6. 4 The CODMittee expre3sed concern about the general design and layout which created excessively Long streets within the proposed subdivision and recommended that the developer revise the map to shorten said streets. 6. 5 Revised Tentative Map (Received and dated June 10 . 1975) The developer has incorporated the recommendations of the Subdivision Committee into this revised map submitted for your review: raised median, radesign and elimination of same of the intersections with the most westerly drive and redesign of the layout to shorten local streets. 7 .0 In view of the a;Jove information, the Subdivision Committee recommends approval of revised Tentative Map 7742 and offers the following ccn-- ditions for your consideration subject to all necessary findings re- quired fG - tentative map approval. SUGGESTED �.UNDITIONS : 1. Tentative Tract Map 7742 received and dated June 10, 19?5 shall be the approved layout. 2. The- sewer, water and fire hydrant system shall be designed to City standards. Tt. 7742 PAGE POUR i ! 3. The water system shall be through the City of Huntington Beach' s water system. 4 . The sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington Beach' s sewage system. S . The property shall be subject to the Local e.-.a.in<<ge assessment district requirements and fees. 6 . All required improvements shall be constructed under the inspection � of and to the approval of the City Fnyinaer. Cost of the inspection PP P shall be paid by the subidivider. . ;-1/2 percent of the amount of � improvement bona shall be deposited with the City Engineer for inspection cost. j I 7 . All utilities shall be ir..atalled underground. j 6 . -Drainage for the subr'.ivi.si.on shalt be approved by the Department of j Public Works prior: to the recordation of a final )-ip. This system shall be designed to provide for siltation and erosion control both during and after construction of the proposed project. 9 . A decorative masonry wall shall be constructed to City specification along "A" & Newland Sts . & Yorktown & Adams Avenues . Said wall shall be sit: inches vide and six feet high. The height of said wall shall be measured from whichever side is higher at finished grade. The architectural design of said wall shall be approved by the Planning Department. The structural design shall be approved by the Depart»nent of .'ablic Works and shall be included as a part of the street improvement plans. The intent of this condition is to improve the street scene along Newland Street and Adams Avenue 10 . Lands ape planter area shall be provided at locations along Newland and "P." Streets and Yorktown and Adams Avenues as shown on the aonr. oved tentative map. Such planter shall conform to the plans and speci- fications on file with the Department of Public- :works and the requirements of the Planning Commission:. 11. The developer shall install full street improvements on "A" Lane with I:he exception that no sidewalk shall be constructed along the westerly right-of-way lane at this time. 12. A. 14 foot setback shall be provided from the ultimate right-of- way of the adjacent arterial highways to the living quarters of the units adjacent to such highways. TT 7742 PAGE FIVE 13. The structures . shall be constructed in compliance with the State acoustical standards set forth for multi- or .attached units, for all units that lie within the 60 CNEL contours on this property. 14 . If the developer proposes to provide air conditioning , tha insulation in ceilings and exterior walls shall be a minimum of R-19 and R-11, respectively. if no air conditioning is to be provided, the insulation in ceilings and exterior walls shall be a minimum of R-13 and R-7, respectively. la. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and ether surplf..s or unusable material., shall be disposed of at an offsite facility equipped to handle them. 16 . Natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at the location of clothe, dryers. Natural gas shall be stubb-A in at the locations of cooking facilities , w-. -er rnaters, and central heating units. 17 . Prior to any additwonal grading alor.g the westerly property line at the top of the existing slope bank on Lot 390 , a qualified archaeologist shall review th area for artifacts , remnants, or burials. 18 . An engineering geologist shall be engaged to submit a report to the City indicating the ground surface acceleration from earth movement for subject property. -19. All structures proposed for construction within this subdivision shall be constructed in compliance with the g-factors as indicated by the engineering geologist' s report. 20 . Calculations for footings and structural members to withstand anticipated g-factors shall be submitted to the City for review. 21 . A chemical analysis as well as tests for physical properties of the soils on subject property shall be submitted to the City for review prior to the issuance of building permits . JWP:gc �-� R► ,R6ce nl Y CF-E Rl Rl CIS it RI ro. c it it iu Ilk R:l i RS f !; 1;2 fit nrj RI ji WL- ! R r RI I ! . i;PA-01 I { RI i RAO t, e:� RI i PA•o RI 3ty1�1.1�,•j,�.:}yi��r ,;etwlk.`iXJb:f'..t.,i::e,- ,. ., •n... . . .... , , ._. , w�w.+rw�r 1 rwew�r TENTATIVE TRACT 7742 "UNtwrlm DR& 11UNT1NTON 4CAU ft.AM101FII'1 K". ��a�"�it�"Ur�i.1r�S.;';r;n.�.r �r.),�.��y a%rr t j Yf 1:�i,',or:: `:'::+:.. ;c,J:y�• .' 1 ... .! _ .r. _ i t{!� �{x.'�,��,,,Y/ .M. ••r�..r•1, ( •.i:fj... i}L{ 4':`I'x L::.'p "y5�•.'io 1....^S��- " i�' lf° s• 'F"� rYir: fT}.'\� �f�•� I.it 1�".?�•,-'.`•.:.t'.�.. . •., '{ . r{• 1• f' EnVIROnMEnTAL REVIW "^^RD J CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH•CAI.IF�NIA �. P.d. BOX 190."445 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Environmental Review Board DATE: April 22 , 1975 SUBJECT EIR No. 74--12 (7•C 74-18 and TT 7742) APPLICANT: Signal-Landmark , Inc. BACKGROUND: EIR 74-12 was prepared by Ultrasystems , Incorporated , consultant for the City of Huntington Beach , in order to analyze the environmental effects of a proposed project consisting of a " lim- ited type" zone change and the development of 385 R1 residential dwelling units plus an unknown, quantity of high-density residential units. The zone change is designed to modify existing zoning boundaries to accommodate topographical considerations , road align- ments , and existing uses. The draft EIR was filed with the City on January 27 , 1975 , and a public hearirg was held on March 11 , 1975 . The final EIR was filed with the City on April 11 , 1975, and adopted by the Env-4ron- mental. Review Board on April 22 , 1975 . Attached are copies of the final EIR for your consideration . RECOMMENDNrIONS: In addition to the mitigation measures set forth in the EIR, the Board offers the following commentary and recommendations : I . As recommended by the subcontractor to Ultrasystems , Inc. Figure 32 in thc� final FIR (mitigation measures) should be the accepted circulation and street: configuration for the tract , with the exception of the p?rkinq area shotrn on the west side: of "A" Lane. 2. In addition to Item No. 1. above, and in relation to the circu-- lation aspects of the project , the FRB sought to establish a priority concern fvo::l the Parks and Recreation Commission in regard to a management program for the dedicated park area and the freshwater marsh. to the west of the site. Due to the fact that no program has been established , Lane "A" will open the lower portion of the bl ,rff area to easier encroachment: by vehicles and pedestrians. It is not the intention or belief that this should or should not take place , but it is the con- cern of the I RB that without a manationent: program this aren vi..l.l, be degraded by c•are3.6ss t resspass . Therefore , the URB 717 't:r t :'^;rs; �.:•s:&,/ t;, +r, { /: ,.};,t t. ! `J•. r:' ii , t- r,•. .•ri:y.., : :t;� :C .0 •i, C ♦+� .,•11: ;v, ,.4 �'F.' •?C.: 'f•`a-r .j.r• �: . ..t ,57.,:"j%: •r? tr,. ..!„ n' .t$r�' t••. }, tr°.. j.`J;'Y t'}.!(, .'fC:.•.twk z. fI` ,Z.• ,C.+. r. .!'a,.. s :'�.' �' • v..-ii. 'r'�a: `r7• #. .. ^;t Ur�. iyt "..r I•e,t 5F1...:, :%��:ti x�:�`j4:. e R'3. :•,,;.-� ,. ., .A.:' .• "iJ1%.. .1,.ir,^f. ,S.,tc. "` '•iC'•'1•• .r. �.1 � j ir. .4y��l5,,`�t� ;L�i�i. 'tr•+K��.i..�rft �` r. �.;,i'.� ;',i'.'�i7.'.•�•: t ^r� �,:.v_ ,. t '4"'t', 'd.. :•l�r�� .,l".:Z.'. `�'i+.'�'.^.fi'.:.�� :*"'3 J3 i ' ,,'i`�y.'�'45 �l:s•y:,r � :1 r, : t � 7;"Y r., t �'• t e. --`- :".4� .• rYj,-1_ .r �. .Y'�... .� ..,t. Ni.i�. q�; .1,�' '>.fJl. .lr:•, f . .{ .. 3•, � h.. .t ..:.'r. Planning Commission - EIR 74-12 April 22 , 1975 Page 2 recommends that, before any access is given to the public .for the lower bluff area to the west of this proposed pro-- ject, a plan be established to preserve and regulate the potential park area. The ERB would be pleased to discuss this situation with the Planning Commission at any time. 3. It is also recommended that the alignment of the roadway where "B" Lane and "L" Lane intersect follow the existing Flood Control District storm drain easement. In this manner , the roadway and storm drain overlay. The zone changes metes and bounds description would require modification in this case. 4. Ref. Figure 32 (p. 121) of Final EIR: The intersection of "A" Lane and "V" Drive where B proceeds north to "B" Lane should be fenced to allow only Flood Control vehicle access. Until a total park plan is developed , it may be deQirable to fence the entire Past boundary of the dedicated park area. 5. 'No project should proceed in the area encompassed by "B" Lane and "L" Lane (Lot 386) until the archaeological resources are completely investigated by the City and the project sponsor and adequate' dispositioL and mitigation measures are instituted , which may include site salvage. ,t CONCLUSION: The Environmental Review Board recommends that the Planning Com- mission adopt~ Final 'Environmental Impact Repo: t No. 74-'12 . G' Nv n A. Tooker, Acting 7btszetary • Environmental Review Board MAT:df � ` f 3.6 Traffic and Circulation The following traffic analysis was prepared by Linscott Associates , R Traffic and Parking Consultants , Playa del Rey, California. The conclusions and information are based on their study of the area , augmented by available P.135 traffic data and one conference with City Public Works Officials. Primary traffic access I-o the proposed Signal-Landmark residential development is via Beach Boulevard (State Route 39) and via Adams Avenue, Newland Street and Yorktown Avenue, which border the site on the south, eaot, and north. (Figure e 8). Beach Boulevard is a major north-,Louth arterial highway (Z20-foot right-of-way) which links the site; to the San Diego Freeway (Interstate 405) and North Orange County. Beach Boulevard is fully improved as a six-Zane divided h'g;way with curb parking. There are no peak hour parking restric- tions on Beach Boulevard at this h t%me. The resent speed limit on Brach� p �' Boulevard is 50 miles per hour. II Adcn-is Avenue, which borders the site on the south, is a major east-heat arterial highway. Adams Avemie west of Newland Street is par`:ialZy improved as a four-late highway with separate left-turn lanes at Newland Street and at Beach Boulevard. The posted speed limit on Adams Avenue in the site areas is 45 miles per- hour. New&znd Street is a secondary arterial highway (80-foot right-of- way) which bcrderu the site on the vast. Newland Street is fully improved J with curb and gutter on its east side and partial.7y improved on the went side (ad�;acent to the subject site). A ,full 64-foot-wide roadway has been providel in the site area. Newland Street is do:tignated as a pertion of the Huntington Beach Bicycle Tra l Syst:em and ar7 a-:ght-foot-wide bike Zane has been marked at thc: edge of the roach,,rxy in both directions. New4and q'rel t is precontly striped a3 a two-lane street wi:th a separate left-turn tare. at Adams Avenue and at, Yorktown Avenue. Newland Street: is currerztTy posted for a 40-mile per, hour apeed limit. 83 t � . r Yorktown Avenua, which borders the site on the north, is also a ' seco► daiy arterial highway. The Yorktown Avenue approach to Beach Boule- vard has been fully unproved as a 64--foot-wi.de roadway with two striped lanes and a separate left-turn Zane. East of Beach Boulevard, Yorktown Avenue is partially improved as a two-lane higlcwatl. Full curb and gutter improvemcni':s have been built on the north side of Yorktown between Beach } Bouleva:•d and Newland and on the south side. between Newland and Magnolia Streets. ` Traffic signal controls are currently -in operation on Beach �{ BouZevard at Yorktown. Avenue and at Adams Avenue. These; intersections are semi-traffic actuated with vemi-actuation on Adams and York-town. There are also separate left-turn uignal phases for Beach Boulevard at both Adams; i• Avetuce a►ui Yorktown Avenue. The intersection of Adams Avenue an-' Newland � Avetuce is also signal-controlled with a full traffic-actuated system. Traffic at NewZand and Yorktown is presently controlled with stop signa. i Stop controls have, been installed on both Yorktown and Newland, making this a four--stay stop intersection. Traffic acceno to the proposed residential development. in also provided by Magnolia Street in conjunction with Adams and Yorktown Avenues. P. 135 f Magnolia Street is one -ha'f mile to the east and interchange's with the San Diego Freeway. !Magnolia Street is a pr%r,,ary north-mouth arterial higluaay (100-foot right-of-way). Mag►olia in cure ntty str'ipe,-] an a four-lane divicled higlw%ly with u painted median and separate left-turn lane at both , Yorktvijn crd Adams. n4r'b parking is pear, tied on Alagnotia Street. and ` there are no peak period parking restrictions in effect at this time. Traffic signal controls ara in operation on Magnolia Street at York':nwn Avenge and at AGL—rts Avenue. The Yorktown Avenue signal in semi- traffic actuated with the o mi--act:uativn on Yorktown and does not contain separate left-turn phaoing. The signal byntem at the ,Magnolia--Ada'ns intar- section is full traffic actuated and also does not contain separate left- turn planar:.-. it th►c time. 84 1 1 Regional traffics semlice is provided by the San Diego Freeway (Interstate 405) via the Beach Boulevard interchange (approximately four � f • � miles north of the site) and the ..agnolia .;t,, set-War ner Avenue interchange '(approximate Zy three miles north of the site). Construction of the. planned Route 39 Freeway is uncertain at this time. This ,freeway was planned to paralZeZ Beach Boulevard and has been delayed for at least 20 years due to 1 C funding priorities and environmental concerns. Table 10 presents recent (1973) traffic count data on the traffic facilities which .verve the Signal-Landmark residential development. Access to the circulation system, as shown on Tentative Tract Map 7742 (.Figure 8), is to be at sib': locations. Two access points are planned � on Ad=,s Avenue (one opposite New Brittan bane and the other approximately midway between New Br4ttan and Beach Boulevard), and two access points on Newland Stt�eet opposite Doremere Drive and Carson Drive, The Last two access points are to be on Yorktown Avenue, with one access point opposite Harding �# Tune anti ".he other approximateZ?/ 240 feet east of Worchester Lane. This � s access system will result in a relatively equal initial distribution of traffic from the site onto Adama Ave?uce, Newland Street, and Yorktown At' onue. In addition, four of the six access points to the subject devel- opment live been placed opposite existing streets. � • i Traffics Generation and Intact �f ; 1 Table 11 presents our projection of vehicle traffic generated by the proposed residential development. Table 11A presents the traffic gene- ration factor:a (in vehicle trips per dwelling unit) used in projecting generated troffic-and Table 11B generated traffic (in vehicle trips). t We prode-t a total trip ,generation of S,900 vehicle trips per day (2, W out - 2.1950 in), with an .01 peak hour of 490 vehicle trips 0050 out - 740 in) and a PM peck hour of 680 vehicle trips (410 in -- 270 out). TABLE 10 RECENT AREA TRAYFle COUNTS - 1973 I , t Traffic Fac a li ty 24-Hour Traffic I � t Beach Boulevard South of Adnma 19,800 ? i Between Adcvns and Yorktown 24,000 North of Yorktown 24, 000 i Adca7s Avenue West of Beach 6, 400 Between Beach and Newland 13, 500 Between Newland and Magnolia 17,100 E Newland Street ' South of Adams ?, 700 Between Adams atul Yorktown 2,400 North of Yorktown 1, 800 Yorktown Avenue E' West of Beach 3,600 Between Beach and Newland 4,200 ' Bc tteaen Nero',14nd and Magnolia 4,309 Magnolia Street South of Adams 15,500 Between Ad,= and Yorktown 20,000 Noi.th of Yorktown 29,000 i t,t ..son Diego Freeway t North of Beach 121, 000 Bet-weep Beach and Ma 116,000 South of RagnoZia 110,000 t SOURCE: City of Hunt:ington Beach California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS) 86 Tab le 11 TRAFFIC GENERATION i A - TPAFFIC GENERATION FACTORS , y AM Peak Hour1 PM Peak Hour Land Use 24-Hour Outbd Inbd I Total Outbd Inbd Total Sing Ze-r'ami l y 2 12. 0 0. 66 0. 30 0. 96 0. 55 0. 77 1. 32 MuZti le-FamiZ 3 7. 5 0. 53 1 0. 13 0. 66 0. 36 0. u9 0. 95 8 - VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION AM Peak Hd r4 PA! Peak Hour4 Land Uee 24-Hour Outbd Inbd Total Outbd IInbd Total 385 Sing le-Farm,t y Dwelling Units 4, 600 250 120 370 210 300 510 - 1%5 Multiple-Family5 rtje t l i, Unit$ 1 300 1 100 201 120 60 110 170 TOTAL 5 900 350 140 490 270 410 680 1In vehicle tr-ps per dwe l l inq unit. 2Staff Report; Transportation Planning Division, Department of Traffic, Ci lij of Lots Angeles; June 1973. !� 3Derived from attulies of vehicle trip ends generation rercarch counts, CALTRRN►S, District 04 (San Francisco) and District "? (.a cn Uiegol. ` nrn vehicle trips (one way vehicle movement.. either enterirtq or leaving subject land tine). 512. 5 acres of R-2 sorting at 14 dweI Ling.,unite per acre (12. 5 x 14 175). Traffic generated by t%is development has been distributed and assigned to the str.iet aystem based on a map study and knowledge of area shoppirul facility locations, eTZoyment centers, area traffic facilities, and local Crave Z habits as shown in Table .12. TABLE 12 TRAFFTC DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT Generated . Percent 24-11our Peak Hour To/From Dint-ribution Traffic, MI Outbd AV Inbd Beach Boulevard North .3.3% 1, 900 115 135 Sou th 15ro 900 50 60 -1dams Avmxce Ea,:t 25% 1, 500 85 100 Wes t 10% 600 35 40 Newland Street North 5a 300 15 20 South ?.� 10" 10 10 i Yorktown Ave►ucu Fast B% 500 15 35 West 2 100 10 10 TOTAL 100ro 5 900 _ 350 410 1Rounded off ro nexreat 100 vehicle tri,rw per day. From Table 12 it can be seen t3Lat generated traffic will hwe its greatest impact on Beach Boulevard to and from the ►orth mid on Adorns Avenue to end from the eaz;t. The addition of traffic generated by the subject development will not, in our opinion, affect: the level o.- traffic service on Yorktown Avenue and c,: Newlard Street to any. significant deorea. In order; ;o dct nvnine trte impact of generated traffic, we have a►ialyzed tho AV peak co►wa4ter hour. This period ;as been chosen because it reflects tile hour when both street traffic and generated traffic are typically at their highe►rt levels. Westbound traffic on Adams at Newland --- ;< as i t i � r. and southbound traffLo on Reach Boulevard at. Yorktown have been analyzed since they r►tnn,osent the approaches to the site which will carry the highest traffio volrunls. i Ravll'ew of City and tALTRA.NS traffic count records (for the 1970- 1973 pori.od.) indicate: that traffic on Adcm3 Avenue has been increasing tit an average an uua Z grog-t-h rate of 10 p--cent per year and Beach Boulevard at :7.ro percent per year. A cr.ty traffic count niade in 1973 shooed a Pt, peak hour volume `f of 700 vehicles :ears tbo:md on Adams at llew land. The 1973 CALTRANS Traffic Censue shoo►.=.d a two-way p,,ak hour traffic volume of 3700 vehicZes on Beach Boulevard north of Yorktown. We; have aseT ,red a 60 percent southbound - 40 percent not►t bound direction trat is split. This results in an, estimated ' "973 R;; peak hour of 1, 620 vehicles southbowui on Beach Boulevard at Yorktown Avenue. Table 13 pr►r.a ntn our volume►-capacity analysis for the two pri- mary traffic approaches to the site. 'I- to 1973 Of peak hour traffic j'igw--es have been prc ected to 1979, using the average annual growth ratc.7 deter- mined from the 1970-1973 time period. Sine,e the, imr,�act of potential national energy and r7nvironmental control pclicies is uncertain at this time, the � vol u7o-capacity analysis has been mad( for the year 1979. It has been assumod for the traffic analysis that the Signal-Landr»ark devetopment would be covq7Zeted and fully occupied sometime in 1979. Traffic capacity has been estimated using Leve Z of Service D cri- teria. Briefly, reruic•e levaZ D is the level of traffic service cZosetit associated with urban aria peak; travel hour traffic conditions. At Level, 5r ecia7._ Report 87, Highwpj Gayacitu Manual; Transportation Research Board; Washington, D. C.;� 1965. - 89 i { TABLE 13 I VOLUAR,-CAPACITY ANALYSIS �t PM Peak Hour Tra f is - 1979 :1 ; Projected ,, Mume-- Residential Est:*hated` Capacity E Location an-Street- (Si.p iaZ-Lanrzmark) Toto.l Cavaei.tt Ratio rou thbound Ij Beach Blvd. @ YorkL:oWm 1, 81 5 i31F 1, °80 2, 400 0. 81 , Wes tbound Adana Avenue, i 0 PJowland 1 1"0 1 100 1 220 2 4004 0. 51. } -1973 P�,, sneak hour traffic prc ected to 1979, Peach Boulevard at: average i annual grooth rate of tWo percent per, year and .4d=B Avenue at V per-- �+ cent per year. Estimated Capacity at Level of Service D ' `Volume,-Capacity ratio = total PM peak hoia, traffic 4 estimated capacity. i { 4Adams Avenue aBszuned to be J10Zy improved, t;tri ad, and operated as a six-lane, major cuteri.al hig;way. of Service D, f:-acdom of traffic ►novemnnt is some-what rust-meted and traf- ficmay occasionally have, to wait through more than one signal cycle. 'I Hokle,ver, tr.7f fic movement icy generally maintained without u-rdue congestion and de lay. Tile: results of our volzone-capacity analysis indicate that the r addition of peak hour traffic generated by the proposed Sigrw,Z-Lan&nark i� s deveU>pment will '►zot produce a traffic voZcvne level which exceads street eanac;ity at Level of Service D. Projected on-street traffic (non--Signal- Lazndz rk traffic?) would »esu l t in Volume-capacity ratios of 0. 76 on Beach � Boulevard and 0. 47 on Adams Avenue. Addling generated residentiaZ traffic:, i f 1 � i 90 i� Is results in an increase in the volume-capacity ratio of approximately seven percent on Beach Boulevard and nine percent on Adams Avenue. VoZlorte-capacity anaX rjvir: for paak evoning hour for the portion of Nnt.+land addacont to tho rroJect: indicatvs a 1979 voltene%apacity ratio of G. u0 southhou►Id at P.135 Ad,-'nor and O. i nn>>t.hbound at Yorktown, for projected traf f'ic plus project- !� gimcivtcd traf j ie. This mould still be at level of Service A. 07I thin s . a • ha;Iis., wecv►Ic, ltcd�. tllut; tllr. traffic. generated hcf t►t4 subject ubjac,t development wl:ll not a l tC v the futl x-e l cve L of traffic sci v ica in the site area to any 'I Si ►;it���, ► I; d e, ree. G,?' Rev iel., of r h(: r tree t syn tent for the Sidra l-I',andrn;zrk dove lopmen t i as prevented in Tentative Traci., Map .".70 1742, shows a well-conceived street. layout. Travel distances front most interior lots to the arterials which border the sit,' are generally short. The Various a'treets are not overly long and along t:f th the goneral street pattern, should tend to dis•- r_aurage indiscrimi natc o �eedi . It should be noted that most tri s in and I n 9 p j out of a rr:ri.de►It7al development are Trade by the residents themselves. j Si?wc they ave f a mi l ix, with the street pattern and know where they are L going, a subdfvis' on, of .3hort stvee s in a c*vcu'i totl; pattern wili not neceasarily ctit dorm on opooding. Tho street pat-ter►I is general'+y conducive to the establishment of safe routes to sehcol: for padestria,:s and bicitcliats, with adequate s i dCoa l k,;, crossings" and v igna t lights at main street crossings, and P. 13, with designated bike lanes. High school students reni.di.nrg in the proposed development will a t:tend Huntington Peach Nigh School, 1. 5 mi l es to tlln west on Main Str►eot opposite the new Civic Center, and intermediate eahool etude►tta Uwyer School., 1. 6 miles to the southwest on Palm Avenue. Veprrentrzl,y school students may attend one of three schools, Perry School, located on Harding Lane, 0. 75 miles to the north; Paterson School, 1. 25 miles to the south on Fcumoworth Lane south of ritdianapolis Avenue; a►ui the p 1lan►red Site 23 ec.•hoo Z, .1. 0 miles to the southeast on _ .. rs Rarlarest Orive. Off site, good routes are available to Perry School and to the future S::to 13 vchool. Nooever•, studenta will be required to move e Ic• diatanca along avtorial streets to reach Peterson School. t f 91 I,a ndscapi.ng and layout of the exita from the project onto Newland � must oor::i.dar the ability of motori.str anA cctel.ints to vee one another. Lack- 4 t . , , , . P.139 Ir�rt !►rl;rl..r•rrr.c• �lr f.rri 1;.•, t.tr;.: c.cl.trtnt. h� r'IetFrmi�zed fr�.rn tits r.a^i..ti.rnr r►it�. l�lr..n, , t bul, t-rafJ•?(f ni.,vibilli4p tr114:,t bi, u,-.:';n1dcr'ad in tha flpial layout.. 1 i� loc n-ss .:o the Signal-Landnar k residential deva?op,ne it is welt- #� r_oovdinated with the exiating access points to other surrounding tracts. i Wherever c osnible, pl.: ined a�;cesi3 points have been placed ovposite:� exist- ing street;r, to form four-legged intorBecetions. Pwo of the six access Points do not 1,1*ne up with other streets. ITII tune, which borders the acre multi-family a•ite on the west, forma a " "► inters,-ction with XoVkt.own Avonue c.ta., of Ji olte:jt:er bane,. A Lane wl.;:c.h i.: shown as bar - �Gx'2}Sg the rii►tgle-family residentta"' area cn the Wast, formi; a ►I`;,II inter- aeotion wzi th Adcvne Avenue. The property on the zouth side of Admus it; pre8,�Int ly un::Ieveloped and a►:u futuva ntreet coulc'. bo align!:I oppooite "A" Lane:. The question has been raised with regard to the neon' for "Al, Lane. The traffic service pater:t,•i.aZ of '►!," I�rrrre and its irapar.' on the proposed City- County Park. to. the went Nihich is intencred to be a fresh water marsh precorve for l.rlcal ►.r%ldli.fo), should be cronni.dered as factors in detevnining thr ui.ti- a Th,i tract map shoWs "A" Lire as an access facility. Residential lota back up to "A" tnrie, With tha interior sere,?tv proviling land service. Although "A" Lane doe v not act as a � ntd service c:leMent, it does provide divect ac'c•eas to Adama Avenue from the central portion of the tingle-family residential area via IT". lh'ive. As ouch, "A" Lane minimizes the tr,Zve3t die- ta►:c'e3 between the center of tha tract and' Adams Aveltue. Tha RIR for tha acl jac ent Flood Control .Stormy Drain project (DO1PD5) shows all off-Bt'reet parking area foil an eatimate.d 25 autos on the wrest side? of "A" Laney at kdtvrrs to serve the planned fresh water marsh area. Since the= propased residential development f aces inward, ample add:tional curb parking will be available on "A" Lane. Moreover, the sidowal k whi ch ' - !+ would be constructed on t;he west side of the street eouZct` .rai+ve as a p-edon- trian promenado for per-aorta wishing to talk c;long the poisimeter of the �ttr.t:lt ,ct►c�.t �� 92 E We t7stlmat.( -that an overage of 600 vehicle trilpn a dal} iJouM be gem.-I jtij t;�It' :�t,jt2�-I I rz)ui^ICl2'K (lE?Ut'•1C)��!t1( n t CIYl I'f1" l r2Y1(.. �i i t E; WG 4;1 not j ttr�n. "-111 ha?"? r11; at1;YdIGjjl Nrill2.r1, :;r':71r' Lr'zff is tint flitaor 1•it of with t ho auh- t,�• .. d%w.lr�l;mr..Il, t,,1'L.l, tt►uu�tt .r.r,rll.� tu,r. A Lati., rztt it l,t.IL r'L t UtlL(.. Thin ttlaffLC 1:Zua tn2j fic wo and Jmf:( tho r";c.lnoh area parking lot., L)hon a(lded lto ' irGt t't'sziZt t*n an est•iriated 800 t_-o 1, 000 vehicle Lrips baoe would alao pro r.'de a Zogical for-ation for the bike � Imic prol.os ?d ai'onri th,e Grit vide of the mar,,,h area. Thie Coinl tLc p. 139 %)It(? .r.►1t� %"'2.T:1/G12.'lC St�Li;`C71 via t•hrl =b �:r' l!1)Ie on �orktcwn Avenue. 2JfIich :Join a c:,'r►.'U eot-- T:U the planned Newland Xii;Ctnu,;, Hke trail. Prtim a stapwlroin> , "A" Late is a desirable plait element, ltltic t? 6r p1`OElia'ea ac';.'E no- to the (:ontri j?01'1`1.�?): Uf' fj1E.' L1'ilc7Z` L7j1Llr? It2Lf:11'►2.3-- 3.7 Noise Over the last few years, there has been growing public concern with the increasing noise levels in the nation' s corrmunitiu)s. This grow- ing concern is evidenced by the rapidly increasing number of complaints being received by public agencies and by the recent flood of noise-related litigation now taking place in the courts. Aiso, federal , state, and local l3overrrrent agencies are beginning to enact numerous lags, ordinances, and regulations relating to noise. The question of community rol4e control has, therefore, become an important consideration in urban planni'-J, in construction practices, and public administration. The major sources of urban noise can be attributed to engine cowered transportation equipment _uch as aircraft, automobiles , truck s , and trains. i The question of noise relative to the Signal-landmark Develop- ment will be addressed from two viewpoints. First, the impact of present and future noise sources upon the inhabitants within the project site will i be examined, and second, the noise increase in the surrounding community ' due to the develop'nent will be assessed. { i i 93 t A R Traffic The follokling traffic, mi tigatiorr measures were prepared for Ultras yste stems, Inc. , h}/ Linsrt�tt Associates , Traffic and Parking C7nsul - tants , Playa del Rey, California , as part of their pripcipal study (Section 3.6) . ir:i-t"'j'l:+-17� �.'Y'yf'�•1� I +�f.)t f)(<7): . liti !!t ,.�-.�•t•� ;% f j'C' :'t')j:"hj',t� !.{,Jt ;.r•t(J ,•.11 ;:;.):'J .•r!t(�,'R: i tl 1'i'i? '1 ':port rho . :•tie 1 t t t., .A.i✓•- ti i i..l r.✓G ',r.•- '>:f, 1. + ),';_i C,t- :'�� l• 'r 1., � ) t lj•J l?:. <�.�:.�t.'fI�1:� ,f,•!'ur:' iiL':J�iir..i •) rlrt-•t.rl t' r rf {:l l/r/rl I•� e, iti n ` t- ✓t'•1t �'r .� L ),r� I'i••.!' ��Jt(Nta rl )• t,)IL. ).':l�itii:i ' F• .1 If L' ; Y t ! ) + ))I rI! f•1 .•I: J .I;t • t"l.:J /1 (��� l• 'i:' •i l.:.) ' •... ;Y+ti;. ��i r..• f .J•: ,'• j c.. t ,.7 Jtl.'•!!i -,*ch C:."uZ 1 l 1)4' :1�: t!):el'::i ' S. .. .s r • .., , •J • . t.t • . r ' r 1 t �('1••.J L: .t.!-• t`.'f11•lt Y'i? r•O r./;t.` . ;:l �' jr ' t r .• •r •/I 11 • r :-t1 t ✓t.'l•� ei _�l; !7t:l.:c t:, ,.f ::1��.'r .111'.l �::7 bt�.'F t i':'1•�/ to to 1l' ll:. j'c:';�4?:J'L7) ,r :: •,.• cl:. ' Tr',7�i.1!.t� s1 .;,,,^, T;): c;trf:';t�. -,.j. rovt".01i :7�: f•,lrf rit�:Lr :il:!'..( r;')i It 11t L!1't•t�. i)TfZ fti rt sT�r: t• ..fT (i( t?(� (fGlr'j111!l s,'.'::: L:i+ 1 t.J� ::l. .J� . r. C�:•c: . r^i.t. •:ilSr= j,f•l,l.r'1 i s'.:: ��C " l+t'•LT?.: ?/S i•t:� (lt;Lit'L •r- c.I. wn,1` f 22 ram•. :.V'i r'f ::•'t•�rt••, ,. t?j.'ri:�I'4,'. 1tL'/ tt11 tt 1i1 0) .0 !.T fi!"!'. f''.ir.. tt, t)1.+t• !�[_c�'"It'r7 f. t c.,.._,'..: -on t,r,.-z ✓j 7•,?+i i.�f r1t.' rt C tJr;i•1t' r'f•r:J.'•?L: %11.1 rt LfF :.a:li�(1/: ';�• �. .+t'J.'1.t'R /r111 rJ Zlii.' lil'r,': �t vt� if.:'trtT:i :'i ♦•. r ,,. '.t .i �Ili ltlo: t.t:►I(:f •1C. t•t:c! I!'i:'r rt i.:::•�i' /ttri.l.+4(' tr. rl • • J �11! •li � •I �. t:-:: 1 1.,:7►Fl. . :1 ,EJl:• .c • ttt•�.�7t'�.t t7l�j'I . t';] ti'JCj1 hr. .' ri?(J, f'C11, lj ;iJ 1. CCt;:.� CC';i� a'!^''.:f'1' 0'~ : �l!' :iT C ►N;(� fi l�? �� R+• y • i ' d L'.i)!tj•� t?J-l'•^•1.!I(lt: �•:flC'>il':2•l7a fr;•rJrl.jji !T',It�•sa,a Grj12 sr:` fij'::JI)2:.�T •lG) iI'1 :1 "1`i!-• J r'i,z ! !1.11 °:•C.' 1'ro ';1 ltf' ! ?',^ :)IJr:f� reiI T:t'1+/i1 !'%iL' a 1% f i . ,it,l )�f' :t In?•ltt lf}.' '/ ..r!' it :�f:1?IJ"at.)if.' {)45)•r�ya�'.�. 1101; W11 {?!;;)LI'C�%!`t1F'.11ta1G ti1X' f12•C%1<)�%i .•LTt !t{.I►1;�ltiltri;' Lt"t•!•` ' the 1'-arsh in :�„rl;(,'.,�f''J;.e.''•,:�, �j'.xlf�:>. (.ri'.1'-�.ffiiyf.' �,;'rY7; the..? Ri. + f Of Rh,! t f•,li..'i I(1 A!!(vrin Aittmuo L2-,;ilICI iii' 10!.7;.;lt^►:[:CI eZ!:u tr1..r0 L't•14i1!Ie 1-7i1 :0 tz"t-W :I/';tt. An (ZCLI4•tl! mi.6 400 tyhi -70 tro ' :.1 par dily al-:.':, be a-M.':1t jt1 'r..tr rims !1.-I '100 to Nl rt �c7tlif. r- • t. ' „ t 11 11 .• . t . ! r . . �1r', t'�It.2'!'(,?lte. , 2'i;'1!t�I/l`72t.'f.•1 that t? j,QI2C' Jt:' t.t11Lj t? 14t"t•6Cw1 !fit t L1! , Il f� �il.!'11; /�1)i.'?IIlt' t111(1 'tit" t�t'1.(1t' rllf��lt't7;C1.1!(rlt('Ly IIJi-i�WU�/ rT1(:�L)!It!1I /�(fcaT(li /�l!t'rll.!!! 11a t.07-1k41 :ive to th"i•r would be to ron truc•t ►►A" Ltzpu, only to "W" Drive. Noweuer, this would not pi,ovide the desired access } to the Center of the tract. Pubic Transportation Thetraffic impact of the project would be reduced byincreased � I public use of available bus service on existing O.C.T.D. routes serving the area as snows in Figure 33. Route 29 runs north/south on Beach Boulevard west of the project site; Route 76 runs east/west along Adams s ' Avenue which makes up the southern boundary of the site. The adopted Orange County Transit District's Rapid Transit System Plan is shown in Figure 34. An adopted rapid transit corridor rung along Beach Boulevard and will serve the project site in the future. In addition, increased availability of bicycle rights-of-way .,rill tend to somewhat -,-,:duce reliance upon the automobile. As indicated in Figure 35, the city has already embarked upon a bicycle: trail system ' which will eventually spread throughout the City. 4.8 Noise The project should be designed to meet noise abatement and con- j f trol standards established by the U. S.' Department of Mousing and Urban Development (HUD) . County and City noise ordinances should be complied with during construction . Hours of construction activity could be limited. 1 � Some specific noise attenuating methods are as follows: ( � A masonry wall , of proper design and location, may be a fmore effective noise ins►altation alternative than double - .. .. . I pane glass. }! t r 1 4' 120 - -� City of Huntington Beach MsWO."rw► P.O. lox Ito CALIFORNIA SUM OFFICI•: OF TfrII; CITE' CLERK Dece&)er 22, 1976 i Mrs. Marilyn 3. Halt 81312 Wenlock Circle Huntington Beach, California 92646 Dear Mrs. dolt. The City Council, of tI)e City of !iuntington Beach at its regular meeting held Monday, December 20, 1976, denied the Appeal filed to the Planning Comnission's approval. of Conditional Uso Permit No. 76-27. Please do not hesitate to contact our office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely yours, Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AtrMW/CB/s R