HomeMy WebLinkAboutPub Hear - Appeal by County Sanitation Dist of Orange County '51 HI.TS GF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
co
0 0
?FGT/%G THE ENNP
August 5, 1996
phone: Ma or Dave Sullivan
(714)962-2411 41 y
and Members of City Council
mailing address: of Huntington Beach
P.D. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA City of Huntington Beach
92728-8127 2000 Main Street
street address: Huntington Beach, CA 92648
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA
92708-7018 SUBJECT: Coastal Permit No. 95-39Nariance No. 95-32 for Rebuilding of
Ocean Outfall Surge Tower No. 1 (CSDOC Job No. J-34-1)
Member Agencies We are pleased to present to you the landscaping revisions you requested
on May 20, 1996 when you conditionally approved our Coastal Development
Cities permit for the rebuilding of our Surge Tower.
Anaheim
Brea In total, we are landscaping over four acres, most in the southeast portion of
Buena Park Cypress the treatment plant and along the Santa Ana River. We have added over 50
Fountain Valley large palm trees to help screen the plant and towers. We will also develop a
Fullerton
Huntington Beach "Aesthetics Element" for our Huntington Beach Treatment Plant with you, and
Irvine will add future landscaping along the treatment plants southerly border.
La Habra
La Palma
Los Alamitos
Newport Beach We would like to thank Mary Beth Broeren of your planning staff and Daryl
Orange Smith of your Public Works Department for all their help. We would also like
Placentia
Santa Ana to thank you and the other members of the City Council for your interest in
Seal Beach the sthetics of our treatment plant.
Stanton
Tustin
Villa Park
Yorba Linda
County of Orange
Da id A. Ludwin P.E.
Sanitary Districts Director of Engineering
Costa Mesa
Garden Grove TMD/DAL:jrs
Midway City J:IWPDOC\ENG\TMD\PLANNING1080596.L1
Water Districts
Irvine Ranch
A Public Wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Committed to Protecting the Environment Since 1954
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: May 20, 1996 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD 96-28
additional conditions of approval were adopted by the Planning Commission that specifically
addressed views from Pacific Coast Highway.
While the CSDOC concurs with the City that aesthetics of the site is very important, they
have indicated through their appeal to the City Council that their existing plans are
adequate. The CSDOC has proposed landscaping improvements that will be completed in
conjunction with the surge tower project (Attachment No. 7). These improvements -are
designated for the southeast corner of the site and extend along the Santa Ana River.
Construction of the surge tower will take approximately 18 months; thus, it is likely that this
landscaping will be installed within the next two years. Additionally, the CSDOC will begin a
strategic plan this year which will include a detailed evaluation and plan for landscaping for
the entire site. This will update the CSDOC's Landscape Master Plan (Attachment No. 6)
and be completed in early 1998. The CSDOC believes that the implementation of these two
elements will adequately address aesthetic concerns about the site. They believe the
conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission are excessive and may delay
timely construction of the surge tower.
Staff has reviewed the landscape plans (Attachment No. 7) and believes that they could be
augmented. In addition, the requirement that additional landscaping be installed on the site
in areas that are visible from Pacific Coast Highway is not unreasonable given the size of
the proposed surge tower. The CSDOC has indicated that they would be willing to consider
landscaping modifications and additional requirements provided that such changes are
sensitive to their operating constraints, including budgeting and project timetables. Thus,
staff is recommending a revised condition of approval which balances the City's and the
CSDOC's concerns. The suggested conditions reflect the essence of the Planning
Commission's approval but provide for a phased approach which the CSDOC. believes is
attainable.
Specifically, staff recommends that the City Council approve the project with a revised
Condition of Approval No. 2. This condition would replace Conditions of Approval Nos. 2
and 3 approved by the Planning Commission. The recommended Condition No. 2 includes
three phases, each identifying a specific project or level of improvement to be completed by
the CSDOC. Phase 1 targets landscaping improvements to be completed in conjunction
with the surge tower and pump station projects. It is the same as Condition No. 2 approved
by the Planning Commission with one exception. The Planning Commission required that
CSDOC provide landscaping plans for the portion of the site that faces Pacific Coast
Highway prior to commencing construction of the surge tower project. The revised Condition
No. 2 requires a plan to be submitted for this task, with actual completion of the plan being
prepared in Phase 2. The improvements identified in Phase 2 would be implemented in
early 1998. Phase 3 of the revised condition of approval is essentially the same as
Condition No. 3 approved by the Planning Commission. It provides for City participation in
the CSDOC strategic plan effort.
CD96-28.DOC -5- 05/08/96 11:43 AM
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: May 20, 1996 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD 96-28
E. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING SUMMARY:
During the April 9, 1996 Planning Commission meeting one resident spoke regarding
concerns about landscaping and views from Pacific Coast Highway. Dave. Ludwin,
representing the CSDOC, also spoke about the proposed project and the CSDOC's
landscaping plans.
F. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission moved to have additional landscaping plans prepared which
would show landscaping improvements along the frontage of the site facing.Pacific Coast
Highway and asked that the plans be brought back to them for review and approval. They
approved the project with revised conditions of approval.
G. SUMMARY
The replacement of the existing pump station and surge tower with larger structures will
result in potential impacts to views from Brookhurst Street and Pacific Coast Highway. The
CSDOC has identified several aesthetic related improvements that they believe will alleviate
concerns about the appearance of the site. Staff recommends that the City Council approve
Coastal Development Permit No. 95-39 and Variance No. 95-32 with revised conditions of
approval based on the following considerations:
• The pump station and surge tower have been designed to meet projected demand.
These two components are integral to the operations of the wastewater treatment
plant which provides a service that is essential.for the health and safety of Huntington
Beach residents and businesses.
• The landscaping plans and strategic plan effort planned by the CSDOC will result in
an improved appearance of the treatment plant when viewed from Pacific Coast
Highway and other public rights of way.
Environmental Status:
The proposed project was previously reviewed and approved in the Joint Treatment Works
Wastewater Master Plan Environmental Impact Report (State Clearing House No.
88012008) certified by the Board of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
in June 1989. This environmental document evaluated the proposed Surge Tower No. 1
with a height of 88 feet (MSL). When studies of the tower showed it would be necessary to
raise the height of the tower 10 feet, the CSDOC prepared a supplement to the previous
environmental impact report. The supplement, Supplement No. 3 to Final Program
Environmental Impact Report for Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities for County
Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, (State Clearing House No. 94071060) was
approved by the Board of Supervisors in January 1995.
CD96-28.DOC -6- 05/08/96 11:43 AM
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: May 20, 1996 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD 96-28
Attachment(s):
Page Number
. 1. Findings and Conditions of Approval for Coastal Development Permit
No. 95-39Nariance No. 95-32 (Planning Commission
Recommendation)
2. Findings and Conditions of Approval for Coastal Development Permit
No. 95-39Nariance No. 95-32 (Staff Recommendation)
3. Letter of Appeal from the County Sanitation Districts of Orange
County, dated April 19, 1996
4. Planning Commission Staff Report dated April 9, 1996
5. Site Plan, Floor Plans and Elevations dated November 13, 1995 and
December 19, 1995.
6. Landscape Master Plan dated 1986
7. Detailed Landscape Plans dated February 15, 1996
8. Letter in opposition (received after the April 9, 1996 Planning
>- Commission meeting)
CD96-28.DOC -7- 05/08/96 11:43 AM
FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 95-39/
VARIANCE NO. 95-32
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 95-39:
1. The request to permit a 3,200 square foot pump station and an 86 foot high surge tower
conforms with the plans, policies, requirements and standards of the Coastal Element of the
General Plan. The proposed landscaping and mural improvements will improve the
appearance of the treatment facility, and completion of the project will promote the Coastal
Element goal of providing adequate community facilities within the Coastal Zone. The surge
tower will be located at a facility which already includes several other towers and structures
which, because of their size, height and stark appearance, may be considered to impact views.
The proposed tower will not significantly add to these impacts but because of its height will be
visible from Pacific Coast Highway. The proposed landscaping improvements are designed to
minimize impacts of the proposed tower and existing structures. Further, the tower will be
located at the southeasterly end of the site and will not be visible from the residences on the
west side of Brookhurst Avenue. The proposed pump station and surge tower will not impact
public access because they are in an area where none exists.
2. Coastal Development Permit No. 95-39 is consistent with the CZ suffix zoning requirements,
the MI-A Zoning District, as well as other provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance
Code applicable to the property. The proposed development will conform with all applicable
City codes. The proposed pump station and surge tower involve the reconstruction and
relocation of existing facilities located within the County Sanitation Districts of Orange
County Wastewater Treatment Plant No. 2. The pump station will conform to all applicable
City codes. The surge tower will conform to all City codes with the exception of the
maximum height limit of 40 feet. The overall 86 foot height of the proposed surge tower has
been approved through the granting of Variance Number 95-32 which has been processed
concurrently with the Coastal Development Permit.
3. At the time of commencement of operations, the proposed pump station and surge tower will
be provided with infrastructure in a manner that is consistent with the Coastal Element of the
General Plan. Infrastructure currently exists to the site. Any modifications to infrastructure
required as a result of development of this project have been included as conditions of
approval.
4. The proposed pump station and surge tower conform with the public access and public
recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. No public access or
recreational opportunities-will be affected by the new construction.
(Attachment No. 2-1)
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL- VARIANCE NO. 95-32:
1. The granting of a variance f6r an 86 foot high surge tower ( 98 feet MSL) in lieu of maximum
40 foot height will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon
other properties in the vicinity and under an identical zone classification. The proposed surge
tower will be part of the facilities at the existing County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Wastewater Treatment Plant 2. This land use is necessary for the health and safety of the
residents and businesses of Huntington Beach. The height of the surge tower is necessary to
accommodate the increased wastewater treatment capacity necessitated by current and
projected population increases. Any land use in an identical zoning classification which
provided a service that was critical for the health and safety of City residents and businesses
could be anticipated to be granted a similar variance that was deemed necessary for health and
safety reasons.
2. Because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape,
topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of the zoning ordinance is found
to deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and
under identical zone classification. Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would deprive
the property of its ability to operate the Treatment-Plant at its optimum capacity and
accommodate future demand. Other industrial uses in the MI-A zoning classification can
operate optimally because their successful operation is not determined solely by their ability to
directly accommodate population increases.
3. The granting of a variance is necessary to preserve the enjoyment of one or more substantial
property rights. In order for the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County to meet the
wastewater treatment needs of the regional population, it must have the capacity to function
at a level which meets these needs. As the population grows, the waste treatment capacity
must also increase. The height of the surge tower is determined by the capacity of the
treatment plant. Granting a variance from the height restrictions will enable the Treatment
Plant to continue to provide the service it was granted approval to provide at this specific site.
4. The granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to.the public welfare or
injurious to property in the same zone classification and is consistent with the General Plan.
The granting of a variance will enhance the public welfare because it ensures that the County
Sanitation Districts of Orange County can provide adequate wastewater treatment.service
which is necessary for the health and safety of the residents and businesses of Huntington
Beach.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 95-39/
VARIANCE NO. 95-32:
l. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated November 13, 1995 for the surge
tower and December 12, 1995 for the pump station shall be the conceptually approved layout.
2. The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County and the City of Huntington Beach shall
work cooperatively in an effort to improve the visual.appearance of the plant as viewed from
Pacific Coast Highway. The improvements shall be implemented in three phases as follows:
(Attachment No. 2-2)
Phase 1 The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County shall work with the
Department of Public Works to augment and modify the landscape plans dated
February 15, 1996 to include the items below. The revised landscape plans shall
be submitted to the Planning Commission for final review and approval (non-
public hearing item) prior to commencing construction of the pump station and
surge tower.
i. The Department of Public Works shall submit suggested modifications to
Drawings No. 1,101 and L102 within 30 days of this approval. The landscaping
improvements identified on the plans dated February 15, 1996, as revised, shall
be installed by the completion of the hydraulic surge tower project.
ii. Additional landscaping between the proposed pump station and the blockwall
along Brookhurst Street. The plant material shall be of sufficient height at
maturity to effectively screen the portion of the proposed pump station that will
extend above the existing blockwall and shall be installed within the one month
of completion of the pump station.
iii. Submittal of a plan to do a study of landcaping possiblities along the Pacific
Coast Highway side of the facility
Phase 2 The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County shall prepare a plan,
pursuant to item Hi of Phase 1, that provides for additional landscaping along
the Pacific Coast Highway side of the facility. The plan shall provide for
landscaping improvements that shield views of Treatment Plant No. 2 from
Pacific Coast Highway as effectively as possible, given restrictions imposed by
the Department of Fish and Game and constraints resulting from the Plant's
infrastructure both above and below ground.
The plan shall be completed at the conclusion of the County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County's strategic plan process or June of 1998, which ever occurs
sooner. Implementation of the plan shall commence immediately thereafter.
Phase 3 The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County shall include an urban design
element in the Phase H strategic plan. The strategic plan shall be prepared by
the applicant with active participation from the City of Huntington Beach Public
Works staff to develop an urban design element which addresses landscaping
and aesthetics of Treatment Plant No. 2.
3. Prior to construction, the applicant shall comply with the following:
a. A flood-proofing certificate shall be provided to the Planning Division.
b. Submit drawings for the proposed water system improvements to the Water Division for
review and approval. All water system improvements shall be designed and installed per
the City of Huntington Beach Water Division's Standard Plans, Specifications and Design
Criteria. (PW)
I
(Attachment No. 2-3)
Ty!
I ,
" ,r •r � ���
,
.............u...auw.
"r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
' ORANGE COUNTY
�.�w.w..�...... •.•� TREATMENT PLANT •2
+"•� ILLUSTRATIVE MASTER PLAN a +�
O
FIGURE II-10 �'-"w•'`
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
1
1�
' �1 j. � it •/ � }�• � d/f'
i•+,��,ily' •t, '�F I /� t i t„ a r•. � � s rt ,tt } i{f l+ �y �• tr{1' l ��rfq .•, Fill ♦=
A �{ 1, �r '� �rt �. - t i. t' j 7! •l',s �- _ f . 1,11, 1� } * :• M .t
,•J 'r •Tt. r�•h� '� H�1�/) �1 sli i ;`t 7 rr. ` ;` ! qr ,Ir rKrljt�,r;l f� r. ON�/J0 �ls •," `v
tt. � � f t .���"'"""�---' {: .1� t i 'i� �1. Mv.S.• yL / )" 1 r� : ,i; t :��•' t/'r•;': 'r, ••• RiR� �.t
•+f;?►„rr.�•�.ti�,;k•'�.' ii" '�vi•�i r1�r�41'i:� 9� Iij*�'., r-"+'tic' �a,;!�nI'�7 �` �.�i rr � •• it +I�, ,4!/�'. ',• iA' •_.
�• •�' ��•.r,:r•`; ;R'�?i•�' f}��'•:,�. ;1.��� :1�. S'•l'r�t1% `'f;.+; A.7r,r fl�r �;j i�•A!� rt,'t' 1 ..�I,•,1�',i�' .�. � •yi r � .,,, .•��.��•y��� �'.j
:��jpr'.f:'{llt++ It1.A'�\ IS rl�.� r ',tl.e{f !.Y' i11 .tr".i'I . C.` �41 r, i,. .f. rlli ki�r �j�r� r P/ :�� .I•.;n
�t/.�/t�_�1 Y�l•r;..`���h'T �' r'��.5't1�6'• r i /�.Cii +•'•Mt�V ��.�+riYO l'ar 1' }SYh•.tL �t' � ,•�' .fit.
r •�• 1, ` `,f (fl 11'rl /ajf�t 1jr rr'i`'•"1•f '.r,1 .�.�' r'}•,_ }t?.fi..•a Trr•, t.•t��':f.A. �rh -♦S '� r j.� N ..•'i.,rt.
t?• �•:�f7 r'. •L.�t: l.. (.� �: �� �•�•1h�: ,.)���, th .L��'./;ice i'� ;,,} ►-.,,•• •r ry1'Y'hr �!Or,• i ,a. 41•'a��,,���r .,'.,. , '�• •�••�' 1 .�II•.i
• '.�I, 1 •' {��f r�j.�! .����� .�� • ���•.LtY�T�' �/ti' '�: Y'�' •V'. r n•r II�7�tjS�, i`( r •I I.I .1••'il'�'�::ai' r '�i
� . ! \�.,. 1 !�l�tr i V I 1 j+ 1/�1:;+ ,�•"1� l :r i. r! t '.11 1..tf� �.�o�(.r�i'� 'lam` a��•P� I �,•t�111��� 7
.• ' . ' ' :. I r i r '.: — ���d�f�iii� r, ►i�lh II I�I6������.
i lob. :.�� -•..�_---rS•�_ ..o��+�`>„rF,�•!:'ra��+•%•-�.:�:�+�•;,,trl.'�-T,u^.''3�3�§r!w�y.[�:+_•+,'.ii�•!!!ryari��i —�
IL
•
t
Ip li ..j r y 'T' '•�_'�''`.��'� f f 1 n f,}'.li/ �{ - _•l. �'4 14A•���= t
aj }� i:�•I l�.' 1 fl l p } Y ,� i
}y �r .1 !' •1- , �/lam'"' !., 1+'• i 1., 1 wry+•
O' j • • 1 f� � /1 �y([I /lwjr � ( 4b M � ►S�f,)• � �f t i� .••1•r1' 1 '
1 ii��' C'�1 p••1•y>j1,♦�.�:' �t�.1i1�• 11 �141 ��tl T • rlY ,r q,. y1r f �bt q�Iy111 tt+♦� ., ,��i. 1;J ••.. 1� I/�� (•j� '•�,.,•p
• r 1 / N � L.a 1, fl,��� 1.. , , h A •t`� r. ,ty • •••t1 ►�•�i 1
.• �•, y I♦� / r� Nif I 1 1 1 l _ y 1 �� 1 �1 S��y t
�I�f��► ���ti f;► r Y i�,'\�' �fgts',Y• '1.a'Y}. l ',!�j '1 lye� � .1 ;� /� ��► 1'�.�1� IYI � �JTWi t • r 1 1 :'/
�'.. ' 1 �I � Ili:is 1/. • /' � ,/r !1'a I ti
!� �+.1 1 I' �•11� + (S�` 1 - ,�(1(e1t 1/ f t ff i 1
1�,�/+11�►1{,,'PI •.'�!':hr.d1♦��Y1/�� Ilb 1{�•V111�:.i1•r I,: r :i�.r•i r'1 ,.Y 1''Ir10.. �I�YILT►VI,Ii,' !! lJ�..l lr� r.1;1 1'it� �,�1��[4/��', r,,•:
'�:'. (' • �++ ��, 41r.•NJ,• "'III ___ 9•i'.L ! r •��'a'A
�1 r� �'? :GY" :• •'•• "•y•. �., �.�t'". •'t.�`•!::'"Yl;•r•' SaO'•�,:%._.'• t7+,.`Irs•f,l t� ;�•.•!1� t! ' �
F•1�0� M��t�+ �µRt9�' .��, 4At;;';�Sr't�il�.4�lt� ".'•'r 'i�
�� �1i,/r.•. 1 e+�S�. • „ ' ,,�jY�/'it.i�r�/�11 ,_ 1.4`;� •�J•At; +• • r Y V:*F 1� .
�1•+�� L..L1 CAI �• i � AI`■ , �a : ��•fL�.N,1CL�•!F■A•1,D.1.�; L■.��■pG.I i. tui1,�a►::;.E
i��Y�7��9� ra 1:•`.;7
�:i�. .R'.�!,�- '•,�t yY1� ,,��''�'I^,w•� •d, -
• R r r•
v
Ir
1 --
���'/ % � ��'L�;. ,�yy99r�, , r�,Ty',`��s � la,, d � %'/►�`r�,1���N' r;' 3m,
:, .�'� ,dam/•.�♦ . 1c4%! 7• ,�,�• •.�. .• . :-' ,
rY•"
:>\�� �•,.S '' �r^.' � `���••• .'•�;,� 1••+�7. ,',':�••,f'�lrr: ,1x''��'� ,ri;i;/. , err 1,. ` J, Llj,,� ,.:.
.�.'�..ir'," } ::� +' L ,�ti,l•r�,� 'i' .� .•�, �, h►1 w,; 7•��1' '� •,�j�i,� 0 �•'1 �.
1 �1,,,� r�.,ti,�;. �\���, .���� +1' �' If l'• (•1 r yy VI t ,� � i r, 1� �'' 1 ,(�,/•,..•l�'. �+,•�•.',•' IJ,�. j p•1'j���•'�•e-
.t 1 � 1l1 �',1.'. �� .. ','7' � '� - ': 6�'� ••,�' ,, .'.y�y;; , .4•.•'1'.♦s•,Lr?�'.
1! '/ �' r�i,�� t• �' �t_�•� i f �M I\ ,11i�3I I •��r • '1 �4i.i11.. (►�t �•''a�•'jP•'AI,;
1 t,f" i :' ' ,i.f ' ; r '�1• �•. Palma��miiA�l�.ra;.t
ti �1'•�` i � L %.tl•.t 1'1 � •'••11•17! �1 S 1 V� '1• n,'I A:1 rr
Y 1. r I�:� � f •i • .Il j-1. I�` `{ 1'; V' �• 7.1 '/?'E� /rf: /�'>; f •'u�•. ,
AvO
J r'.�,-r1w�Vty�.q•� ���' 'll� `.� '•AP
�♦ �+.1i L %�ruar•ri hK;.t t ., 1 ' �",•..;�•:
/' ft•tL.��, : r.t.�riw�•...xV.'�..�'� }�'f!C. ,4 � �.� � �.,,� i �, � ��Il. _ •!�y.����.yt,'r�r i ,y - .,;'•'•.1. ,,t
.�� .w, �. .✓•r * r.1 �' �' t • 1 ,. •;�, * tl, tt♦F1�` }b ,�� .�t.ti� Y,(v h,•' rn �YT ?• t�T•
t � t'' f S� �`f' � �t�'' t Cf�\a•1 �•r `•`• • ' �1,1•C1,1Si�r/• 1 ''T
O
1!�„'••� < <�'d R'r `�:' •;� a t±I ! ,1. 1_• d,'d �y .{' i
��t�s����^''��JJ• ��1+�1,;%}i!• •,L+>1�.. •r.'::�1.7'kl.�.•ifjn�.',°;,If�..�!,{►��•S,1.1 .�,�I
NOUN #AMON Sol""
t - .�. ;it, '•. r �, q.t�,...4,/�..'f.,i,l �, 1 1 -S.. � r �`� r ' •i'11,�j 1.
•. r �r��a•.fj'��� ,�!•,:J��%..��v� �! `4r1fX�J1�i1 t ���•l�}}�M r?� ipl�yr 1 !rw{M�1hi,�''i
• ' �J•' � r,1�t���/.'}�1: Ar(�'/^'�:'r:x^'-�.f1!�{�. Yp��ll .,, �+ w,�
•,i v• �� �•
w.
ORANGE COUNTY
View of •
from • •
FIGURE
COUNTY SANITATION OF ORANGE •
v
' �� � �� �IMENT 3
- JOB N0. P2-35-5
�- -7-,
` 'l.,SANrA SHEET L-107
`� U "�-�"- ��-����• ANA JOB NO. P2-35-5 SCALE: I'=500'
•� SHEET L-105
R,VE
p out _ �`"\'• JOB NO._P2-35-5
SHEET L-102
/r `� �� ��•'�. JOB N0. J-34-I
��-�•, SHEET Y-10
wo"s ....y`�`�'• JOB N0. P2-35-5
;
- _���'� c,�E,l an SHEET L-$01
As-
o�
CD —_ a Y.�
Z
om
n IIII�II�III -�. ' •�/,,� �..-�� s.a_.rJ� 11 sa•c 'S���X ''`�1�+' (�'e. O i�_
"o \ 0\ N11111111', i rots b � L(( ll S 1}� � ..�
�L \�\ �' %- ir"""in.as+mn ..c - ;__ Lwo �,fL+R's '-:.1
l ... sa.•r s.•r u•r u•v � r�•r ��5i
�
\ \ `441�L � � � a •''�r '�u `m._�{Y _-__. _- _ iry.ItM(t� \� ` J'7 �
�\ 1l.. r a•c Lejr- . q,..d,�{I -- '_ -\ CC\ 11\`e�� V �.•'
ar[a t.pc\ \� \ ��\ f.'0 1/\/s.s(1 sl'f ].! lm Of�°�• ,a.�.�s� nyG c7 �\.�,st,o„R\���y.,i,/�/
awo< f
�2�, �',''•�� ELX
�L ( r(l(/gym/� �t lY. �•!''.,� / JOB NO. P2-42-2
SHEET L_2
LEGEND
PROPOSED UNDSCAPE MW
Cj
/ O
ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL
\J / COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Of
ORANGE COUNTY, CAI.IFORNIA
C.S.D.O.C. WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 eusHARD
PLANT NO. 2
SITE PLAN
H�.
sHEn
RMOS n I u I
\
A
A N A
'0/
/ UM F(1037 RANT CTEP
�M/MtY wxAmAl a"lOG
rMaui mama[aaNmo�m
Wftl
W1 i f
` ,�IN I •yJ• NEM IUNRAL !� ••
• .+ acw
t a: // COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Of
ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFORNIA
PLAN
aCMF:I•-:o•-o II / P2—J5-5
SITE AND SECURITY IMPROVEMENT
ill��li�l / LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION
jI
PLANTINQ PLAN
f
/ C. oneonly CddroD U�
Conan
aawAmovm Iarz
In.MMI uroarco„
SAk'A
\ �fAlui
-�o
\ 7g
\ /✓� � � wry' � I
i
.Ms.aim ON Tim Km
y,
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Of
ORANCE COUNTY. CAUTORNIA
w P2—]5-5
SITE AND SECURITY IMPROVEMENT
LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION'
PLANTING PLAN
CDmaIIDnTD L102
W KsaDTM N'NDND DAII }�
REMMONS wDovro Dr /,JSd�_ Z7 c Jt
it
1 \ J A N r A
\
\\ A N
1 \\ `\\ `•' N I V f R
1
o"OIEIIAII.00m tTAtON � f-" /I G/G; �•�� � � �_— _
—� ?. '. %/,•.. '/�/,i ._ _Impr
�.•- SSA'f ••
/
----
oiotam atNolo sms
I I KEY PLAN
r
I I •/,, COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Of
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P2-35-5�^ qq�.uu
SITE AND SECURITY IMPROVEMENT
_ xAEo�•_syro 1 ------
,;�.._—...�, ,. LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION
i I
PLANTNO PLAN
BsorR AM GNrNI UO3
® Conwllonta
N0. O="ow AIf m OILY �Jf
REVISIONS u......n ,�71 r SZ
S ANT A
A N A
\_ fix r
� I
I
I
Nit,
.MG MOWN ON Mt RM
��� 1S� Ad
muc Y-ro•-o
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Of
«w q ORANGE COUNTY,CAUFORN1A
P2-35-5
p�« SITE AND SECURITY IMPROVEMENT
LANDSCAPING AND IRR1GAVON
PL ANTNO PLAN
R7q MI GMrRD r
Conm lanit Lib
p[idPpo� Nr11o1m a R
I"Sm f re YIRov[O N r,Tl r!2
PLAN7 LEGEND
p q0 lraooL urYaaL aALr wwo- Yw v[! orr.
1 AM alC n o.cnwN RNWa fYrNaN YDDH IYL ■
• 'CauwIWYKi
In w [Ic aL. Ilclw DNInIlraA LDLIr NAwolwo .41 ■
1 CAL = I [I[rY [[ODLMY IAlnCUAIW GY/DIV■NCIIYLfI1 I Yl ■
0 0 0 01 Cmn o a• c o ■ oNlr, '
t^'1 Jl -1
NO DIN AIN NaN AINo■ ■AA .K. ION. v
' 2 W CAl YOF■4lr0VNAY OYIIK RAM 1■
' YAIL WiAIAY
• !µ Kl Ylw 1■LLItY aIAQ AYt I dL. ■
I I■IT: ALLRYI!■WLAEY AVNA■AIODY raYP1IElAFE■IY.
I fADlY WeIWAI,WIJUAF UrNIAAIY,V arA■
itl.Dr41■!W�[N[■LM ION/ARf fM![E/Y tOOLL.
EAO TALEERI FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL
1 IM 1 IL
Y tAl
1 WL » END
1 CAL
SPECIFIC NOTES
1. M LAr■rwe CwraAeroa uru ArvNw NL famin!In oDlmrl■r rain A
■YRMlDAK nal re■Yr■oedNlNcru FAIn DNcwrAaceA um Ml
■WD■YaYIr 10M AIrNnordM ■O(d11 WeN141.
t, IMINf.Y.ONealGrq M41 KIN■�WlIDaMNW■I■■vrLd YA'mlAl■
ORY■!NI■■M■YrIMYnMyQ q■p
O O O O G C7 C7 C7 Q !. ALL[1NN Awt WAIL N4a'l A i lAYaa d YaNOD[a YIN 1lDLLLA IIA/A ld
ara■[■Arnw Mar■1 4111!d rImIM'r MaG/10 rrKrw w
1 I I I 1 1 tN0!■N1r1YD111D1■IAWipI
• MMIONmlAK iN1Mf[lrrYCM■ONMNI■tt YLY.e■DaK1ANYLLYN■Y
Y . . f• MLnW/oounY lVw nva
I. YCl11LL HIM
�I . MAIYpO wrNY•]lfY■lN[erYIIA■FLLYNA■AlAK■AY AKr
AO■alrl OYM1r�■fA1(111prEy rKlalewr9gYlArW1■Ilaq
rN/1!■wLll.°'r1Rf®IaIL/IaY1
!WO/dTllLdlYl rAN[I!IlMM I OALIWII
■ICYCL!TRAIL !. !OY N■rYAMa■FAIL M Y rILLON■ ,
/o AoonowL IOA warAYrral■vu a INlINNo oMa IIAw A wY1■ar rr■1/Im
oAururx
1. Au rLAar wnaKlIIWL■aN■YO Aao[lo■O grlur MrAN AdD1AnLl
IrN1[crmrrarvrrwDn,lwolrul aorurrl a nw.Ynon�rlwr.
I. MeealYLt■1[IINLOIAIN1aln ALLdLLW I°r1A[I■rLMR WI[NNIn1Alf11m
dpYY!
°• I■MA OrYW/W°'1°KYLWII.WIrIOMWMILIYYYl1MMY010N111RWAlA
IL rmALLALL■EINl Ae EI Mmar.
' 11, ewarcn■rNu1Nw[E tLO1[{R. '■IllebfldlawLar twfp/Ia1M
N■o■v n.Nll ownm Aro nra vUYvuralr Ar roN d oIIn+AY,ao eultr
wivwA rlLL■AUTrm rinwr 11■[IYwwra
' t'�20'•0'
fWM TO SWAT L-0 FDA DETAILS
o-alnl.l
°�tI1LflW COUNTY SANITATION CISI RICTS OF
d A ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA
G WMe a P2•42.2
CLARIFIER EXTENSION AT PLANT 2
PERIMETER LANDSCAPE
w PLANTING PLAN L"=
'� ���' o� No. ![lYYllea ArrA0vf0 YIf o-..« LY
aI Vn10ML A c.7!/ II
f
Irda WoT Mf1A Y/a R raw
frd• � CYp fna0 I� r • f� ayt lf•1'ff r YUC[
Irr1Tf 4 a Imff Y `tea Yw-ar wa Yrfmwt - -- 1!
.of `J I a fall
IV n CaG ai• nr n mt ur IlrwmoC
-
fa61 m 1/rYY rf a f, Cua'r
mean
w.fam pa1rC
_ 1R aYl Mo•L r N M
i � _ -(• _ sir��- _ — r• ;� �C y b ,.� QAY Ytr
- rda YaarAr[ru
ml/•clm m
•df �aK1A1MM • 1 � -10 1
4
I'd s•-f I•d
Ff
• Sr-S• T• 1' • � 1
-e d • . a'd• rd• Yd• d r-!• / 1aa•MR 6Wllllld
,. ..MYm6 p0 M01 MpLK mOal[
F�CONCRETE BRIDGE PLAN - DE MOLMON fury„.mofan .eye a lm ro Ya n.
r-x N.T.S C CONCRETE BRIDGE - SECTION am v aoa y Yaa_ r n n.ry u n.
N.T.S.
w a Dac fw rd P SECTION
e rwl rdr• / SCALE- J - 1'-
w
► b Ae rAwo K PIPE SUPPORT DFIAOLRION
y Y-1 SCALE: NONE
� !Ylulh Tim OaL
u nl.n ...Y.u.o.r® yocnn.a av r � tl � '__......._...__.........._...._...._......
rye w w •.� .....
• LM IMIaym IIIM YY ooL /Y�/ 11 L O '.-••...,�..... _.�..,....
S 1H10-� 111y-Y �oovL 11 1{KL Tfr
Y aI
TO
_.. \
y M Y •
DETAIL L SECDON y rz y y r r yrPLACE IIWF
y pa'1` •� 1'YL ' PYI MwL
` SCALE:* 3 - I-Or SCALE 7 - il-cr
Y / �_ IV-V MUM YMIA t 1'OI ib
IYr Mf f y // f� Y Y',y L::•.,' .; 'Y'M::`AI..Y,pyi._\' .
r fLf�'L f vO mw¢TY. rl.i \\" ��•` on�ia
1 1le/fL .•\. \Y 'N..('.'•y •\- AAU
(� Y \ SAWxpfr Ya
//!
T \-
OI rMIEa Of9Y0 a.rt towel
O m malw�inoau Icw nw I �Y / ■ Alt .Ca
v- r
2.1
oaiws•aloaawf
Tim•na m Ic-,P,LACE- —
N SECTION ax�" f� Y SECT10N O LANDSCAPING PLAN
SCALE: L - i'_ \tgj SCALE: r - I'-O- SCALE: 1-40'-00-
VEMY SCAL18 plr of J--34-1
YOjr �P•,v,a�• JONN CAROLLO ""g Count SanitaUOn
afuwa'�4 { • ♦ ENOLNEERSt y OCEAN OUTFALL RELIABILITY UPGRADES
DITS• o®M • -: `L 9 DisLrlcLv YARD Y-10
'„'f' ■or m fnl d wv n� an cam`.�z . of Orange County DEMOLJ710N DETAILS yrl Ma
a .Ev. f+a er ar+osllol Nov rwY aymAcmo r AND LANDSCAPING PLAN xx o 65
APR 12 1996
DEPAOr
rT ,-
I I JNITY DEVELQFI:IE;1
J6,1,jCS
6Z
G�f�
JQ r/y`c
Cs
3 Z
JUMPS'tart Preschool
MAY 15 '96 13:50 FR SANWA R E-NWPT BCH TO 374155? P.02iO4
Mr. Jon D. Ely
22051 Hula Circle .
Huntington Beach, CA 92646 i
714/622-6003 (W) 7141964-8586 (H) z
z
May.15, 1995 — M
tr'
:7
Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers -.
HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92646
RE: Appeal of HB Planning Commission's Conditions of Approval with respect to OC
Sanitation District Request for Coastal Development Permit #95-39 and Variance
#95-32 (Appeal).
Dear City Council Members:
I am writing this letter in support of the Planning Commission's unanimous Approval of
Conditions relative to the above mentioned Coastal Permit and Zoning Variance.
Although I believe the Planning Commission should have gone even further with more
detailed and landscape mitigation,. I believe their action and conditions of approval at the
March 26 hearing represented a reasonable solution.
In January, the City's Zoning Administrator gave approval to the OC Sanitation District's
(OCSD) request for a Coastal Development Permit and Variance to increase the height of
their surge tower to 98 feet and move such facilities closer to Pacific Coast Highway.
Although the Zoning.Administrator's action recognized the importance of the sewage
plant's function, absolutely no consideration was given to the visual ugliness that
continues to be imposed on the southern gateway to our City by such uses. The OCSD
sewage facility is the welcoming sign for visitors, tourists, residents or potential
homebuyers as they enter our City from Newport Beach.
The prior approval represented a blatant disregard for the stated goals and policies put
forth in the City's current and Draft General Plans. Specifically, the approval of the
subject permit/zoning height variance and construction of a tower closer to PCH without
landscape mitigation violated the following provisions of the City's Coastal and Scenic
Highways Elements of the current General Plan:
Coastal Element Scenic Highways Flpm n
3.6.2.3 Visual resources 3.2.3.2 Land Use & Development
3.6.2.3 1. a 3.2.3.3 Landscape Corridors
3.6.2,3 1. a (3)
3.6.2.3 1. a (4)
MAY 15 '96 13:51 FR SANWA R E-NWPT BCH TO 3741557 P.03iO4
HB City Council
Page 2
3.6.2.3 2 Improve visually degraded areas
3.6.2.3 2. a
The excuse for the variance that Orange County's population is growing.and needs to be
accomodated ,with a higher tower, closer to PCH, is no reason to abandon sensible and
forward-thinking planning policies. The OCSD is capable of mitigating the ugliness at its
facility. The District has had $1 million sitting in a "Site and Security Landscaping
Program" budget that has been earmarked for a landscaping but not spent. If they have
$300 million to try to buy the County's landfills, they certainly can spend what has
already been planned and budgeted since 1986 and maybe more.
The OCSD obviously believes it is above normal and reasonable planning practices.
Unlike when other developments are applied for in this City, the OCSD does not feel the
necessity to mitigate the impacts of its proposed facilities. I sincerely doubt that Seacliff
Partners would be allowed to build a 98-foot condo tower at PCH and Goldenwest
without some kind of mitigation plan. In fact, at the same hearing, another applicant's
request for expansion of a 1,900 sf pharmacy building was accompanied by a Staff
report detailing the restrictive filing requirements of landscaping (down to the width of
tree trunk) plans to public works.
Response to OCSD's 4/19/96 apneal/correspondance to City Cout3cil
A) OCSD's contention that a nexus does not exist with respect to the Planning
Commission's Conditions of Approval is without merit. The OCSD is not
proposing to move the 98' surge tower further_from PCH - it is proposing to move
it closer to PCH and., more prominantly in view. The Planning Commission's
concern over the inadequacy of OCSD's 2/15/96 landscape plans was reasonably
reflected in its request for revised landscape plans and submittal for approval to
the Planning Commission prior to construction.
At the 3/26 hearing, OCSD responded to the Planning Commission's concern over
the inadequacy of the submitted landscaping plans by offering that OCSD would
invest $2 million into landscaping. Rightly so, the Commission felt that if such
mitigate for the tower was being tied to an overall "stategic improvement plan"
(which may include other structures conforming or non-conforming with HB's
zoning limitations), such an "urban design element" should at least be reviewed
by HB Public Works staff.
B) OCSD's contention that the City of HB "does not have the Legal authority to
extend its zoning police powers to the Districts over zoning matters such as
these" is not true. The OCSD facility lies within the general plan and zoning
junsdication of HB and, as such, must adhere to such applicable requirements and
when not in conformance with zoning (height) and the policies set forth in the
General flan.
MAY 15 '96 13:51 FIR SANWA R E-NWPT BCH TO 3741557 P.04/04
1-113 City Council
Page 3
C) OCSD's contention that the Conditions of Approval do not recognize that other
agencies are involved in landscape issues is irrelevant. The District should quit
crying about what it perceives as potential difficult relations with US Fish & Game
and work with them in developing ideas that will work in a landscape plan (or at
least get a letter from USF&G explaining what trees would be acceptable). Pick
up the phone or bring the plans over there. Not all trees or vegetation harbor
raptors.
In conclusion, the Planning Commission acted reasonably and proper with regard to the
conditions of approval.
While OCSD may "sincerely wish to work with the City regarding aesthetic issues",*you
must also recognize the importance of this gateway location in. the City and ensure such
cooperation by requiring real conditions. Our City has been burned too many times by
the promise of interagency"cooperation"on other important issues.
Millions of dollars have been spent over the last decade on our Downtown, The
Waterfront, and other projects in an effort to improve Huntington Beach for business and
its residents. If Orange County's population is growing to the extent that it is necessary
to construct more visually damaging facilities in our City's southern gateway, than it is
also time for the OC Sanitation District to step up and substantially mitigate these
impacts.
I urge you to DENY the OCSD's appeal of the Planning Commission's Conditions of
Approval,
Sincerely,
/Jon Ely
RECEIVED FROM
AND MADE A PART OF THE RECGR_::ti'."7 HE /
COUNCIL MEETING
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLEF(:'
CONNIE BROCKWA`!,Cfi Y CLERK
Deny the District's appeal of Conditions. C� ��ar�h�>
�aP
If want to compromise, use these suggested changes to Staffs
recommendations: I
Phase 1 �—
Insert as last sentence: Such landscape improvements should include vines of
sufficient species and quantity to cover the c-xisting wall along PCH and trees
such as eucalyptus and/or myaporeum to effectively shield and soften views
from PCH. Given the concern over preceived Dept of Fish & Game restrictions,
the District shall submit to DF&G a list of proposed tree species and receive a list
of all acceptable tree species that could be used within a variable distance of a
wetland (i.e. 10', 20', 30' etc.).
L
What is "submission of a plan to do a study of possibilities"? Is that vague City-
speak or what?
New iv,
Condition that "no further modifications or expansions to the plant requiring
zoning variance or coastal development permit will be considered without the
City Planning Commission or City Council approved landscaping plan/urban
design element described in Phase 3.
Phase 3
What is the "strategic plan" referenced under Phase 3? Does it include other
zoning variances? What is their long-term plan at the plant?
05-16-96 12: 26.PM FROM 111 TO CITY CLER ' �_ P01
P, 4,..
RECEIVED FROM
' AND MADE A PART OF THE REC N C.,.T H v �,/•+
COUNCIL MEETING OF��,._fuk.
OFFICE OF THE CITY r LL•!
CONNIE BROCKWAY,CITY CLERK
J
. Huntington Beach Planning Commission
P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 82648
� c
gA
C-1
n,rr.
w May 16, 1996
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
City of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Subject: Appeal of Planning Commission Conditional Approval of County Sanitation
Districts of Orange County Coastal Development Permit No. 9S-39/Yariance No.
9S-32 for rebuilding of Ocean Outfall Surge Tower No. 1
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members:
.I am writing to urge you to support the Planning Commission's unanimous approval of conditions
regarding the aforementioned coastal development permit and zoning variance.
To give you some background, Mr. David Ludwin, the Director of Engineering for the Sanitation
District, spoke in favor of the conditions at the time of the Planning Commission's Public
Hearing.
He stated that not only did the Sanitation District have one (1) million dollars earmarked for
landscaping, but in fact,there was two (2) million dollars set aside!
Now, (because of his letter dated April 19, 1996), it appears that Mr. Ludwin has recanted his
public testimony.
The unanimous decision to condition the project was an action to enforce the General Plan. Any
other decision would have violated the City's Coastal and Scenic Highways Elements,
The Planning Commission was greatly concerned that this item was approved by the Zoning
Administrator without consideration to the visual blight caused by the Sanitation District. It was
especially disconcerting considering that the Zoning Administrator routinely requires much
smaller projects and businesses to conform to the city's landscaping guidelines.
Credit should be given to Mr. Jon Ely. He provided the Planning.Commission with valuable data
and evidence that went beyond the staff report, and beyond what is normally expected from a
concerned member of the community.
05-16-96 12: 26PM FROM 111 TO CITY CLERK P02
May 16, 1996
Page Two
In conclusion, I.respectfully ask that you uphold the Planning Commission's conditions of
approval.
Sincerely,
Bob Biddle, Chairman
Planning Commission
BB:kjl
xc: Planning Commissioners
Melanie Fallon, Director Community Development
Howard Zelefsky, Planning Director
Scott Hess, Senior Planner
Mary Beth Broeren, Associate Planner
(xiso1)
05/20/96 11:42 902
-6P7- 69-c a _t.
S
- NTY
�ECE�JrG
HUNTiNGTG!r �_�,:
- � r31
May 20 , 1996
To: Huntington Beach City Council .
Re : Denial of Sanitation District Appeal
.Item D-2 of May. 20, 1996 Meeting Agenda
Dear City Council Members :
My name is John Warde and I reside only one block from the
Brookhurst Sanitation Plant located near PCH in our
"beautiful community" . For over 20 years I have watched
this site develop and continue to expand. For the most
part, it has been for the positive, however, there has
always been one piece of the puzzle missing, that seems to
never be addressed. That piece is the LANDSCAPING along
the .beach side of the plant, and that piece has caused the
over-all impression to be an "eye-sore" to the community.
I am not in favor of granting the Sanitation District an
appeal . They should be responsible for this landscaping
aspect . I would hope that the City Council would be firm
on this matter and not continue to allow this site to get
any uglier. Please be firm in your mandate that they
provide the city of Huntington Beach a "suitable landscape
plan" that would "mask" any view of what ' s going on in
there . It looks terrible ! ! !
As a Realtor in the area, I hear the many comments on the
unsightly appearance of the plant and the hesitation of
some to not want to purchase a property near such a
gruesome sight . Property values are at stake here also.
If you allow the plant to grow "up or out" , without first
addressing the landscape, property values will take a
downward slope and become harder to sell, therefore, it is
absolutely mandatory that the City Council be pro-active
now toward this, rather than reactive at a later date .
The small cost of implementing a landscape plan, that
would "mask" the view of this plant, would definitely
benefit the aesthetics of the city' s southern most
entrypoint from our Newport Beach neighbor.
I therefore ask you to DENY the Sanitation District
request for appeal of the landscaping requirements
approved by the Planning Commission last month, and demand
that they be required to implement a substantial
landscaping plan along the PCH side of the plant before
continuing any further.
Sin eely,
'z'
J n Warde
682 Melinda Circle
Huntington Beach, CA. 92646
��' 05/20/96 11:42 D01
i
I 6781 Warner Ave.
I Huntington Beach,
1
CA 92647
Tel: (714) 848-8080
FAX COVER SHEET Fax: (714) 842-0871
I
I
o'
I �
;Company Name:
I �
:Fax Number: '�4L • %��� `�
From: �/4,4 0 C
i
I�I Description:
I
� )
i
r yc
j
I
Number of pages (including cover): Y
Date sent: �f��f� Time sent:
If there are any problems receiving this transmission please call:
i ! 2193
dim Treqo 0 2 �
JO ANN A. FERGUSON / r -
.M91 .Wallingford Lane
Huntington Beach; CA 92646 RECEIVEDFR6M �"Inw)
AND MADE.A PART
(714)'-963-2376 COUNCIL MEETINC OF
Oi "T OF THE
CONWILBROCKWAY,CITY
MAY 9, 1996 ` nom
z�m
HB PLANNING :COMMISSION G� m-n,ma-n
C/O .MARY;. BETH BROERAN' PLANNER
�/ c� 1 n �D 3
2000 MAIN `r STREE MA I 1J r936 -: 0� �
f
HUNTINGTON BECF-I;: 2 CA ,.9646
A 0�
-
RE',_.-:COASTAL:. DEVELOPMENT PERMIT #V..n1�v39j�f L`CCLCr�I�1EN1 0-A
VARIANCE: #95 32 - m
< O
m
DEAR MS -- BROERAN:
I REALIZE ".THAT MY--`LETTER IS QUITE- LATE i1V REACHING YOUR OFFICE m
'.BUT: [ DID::- WANT. TO -.MAKE- SURE :.THAT OUR' VOICE.WAS HEARD'..',
AT .THIS .LATE,DATE::`
,[ REMEMBER.:-READING IN :THE:'REGISTER YEARS . AGO- THAT THE
SANITATION- .DISTRICT_HAD.. EARMARKED- AT_.LEAST.A M-ILL.ION DOLLARS,;:`.:
FOR.=-LANDSCAPING. SPECIFICALLY;.THEY WERE .GOING:`_TO. PLANT_ A
LONG:. ROW OF, .TREES.-AL_.ONG`THE TALBERT CHANNEL. THAT , FACES
THE "TREES _WERE :INTEN`DED, TO GROW• TALL AND:`HIDE THE;UGLLNESS;' r
OF .,THE.:CONCRETE _STRUCTURES ON THE PROPERTY IN .MUCH TFIE_
SAME WAY. THAT ;-THE , EUCALYPTUS. TREES_ ALONG_ BR-OOKHURSr-STREET
HIDE ` THE :,FACILITY NOW.-:
THE. CONSTRUCTION `OF-:-THE CONCRETE'. BUILDING<:WAS` FINALLY ' -
COMPLETED L.AST. .YEAR': AND_--THERE- ::NOT IS: NOT A: STITCH' OF
=LANDSCAPING IN, FACT, THE AREA,._LOOKS. WORSE .THAN ``BEFORE
=' BECAUSE: TRASH IS--:NOT PICKED :UP- -ON-•-THE. OTHER SIDE. OF.
CYCLONE FENCE:--.4ND_ .PLANTS:- ARE BEING- LEFT- TO_. DIE`- WITHOUT`
I 'WALK ALONG TALB`ERT,:CHANNEL ALMOST EVERY:_DAY :AND_ HAVE
NOTED'_,THE. LACK` OF: MAINTENANCE. AND-`LANDSCAPING- MY' HUSBAND -
AND: I. HOPE:THAT.. THIS LATE' LETTER _IS. SOMEHOW : INFLUENTIAL IN
GETTING_ "THIS SITUATION: CHANGED.__
S CERELY, ,.
ANN :AND . DWI HT- FERGUSON
S USAN W.PASE
.•s OWNERSHIP LISTI. G SERVICE
917 Glenneyre Street, Suite 7,Laguna Beach, CA 92651
PHONE(714)494-6105 FAX(714)494-7418
500 LAKE ST 10951163 GD P 15--3-
HUNTrNGTON BEACH CA
300 ' OWNERS AND 100 ' OCCUPANTS
024 176 08,14
OCTOBER 31 1995
114 160 13 1 114 160 14 2 114160 23 3
COUNTY SANITATION DIST#1 BANK FARMERS&MERCHAN ORANGE COUN ANITATIO
10844 Ellis Ave PO Box 1028 10844 Ellis Ave
Fountain Valley CA 92708 Newport Beach CA 92659 Fountain V 1 ey CA 92708
114 160 32 4 114 160 35 5 114 160 36 6 r
COUNTY SANITATIO S 1 COUNTY SANITAT IST#1 COUNTY SANITA DIST#1
10844 Ellis Ave 10844 Ellis AV 10844 Ellis
Fountain y CA 92708 Fo alley CA 52708 FountainValley CA 92708
11416037 7 114 160 38 8 114 160 40 9
COUNTY SAN �ND S COUNTY SANITAT IST#1 ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CO
10844 ve PO Box 8127 PO Box 4106
Fountain Valley CA 92708 Founta' a ley CA 92728 Santa Ana CA 92702
114 160 41 10 114 160 42 11 11416043 12
COUNTY SANITAT AN'DIST#1 COUNTY SANITATIO ST#1 COUNTY SANIT N DISTS
10844 Ellis PO Box 8127 10844 Ellis Av
Fo in Valley CA 92708 Fou a ey CA 92728 Fountain ey CA 92708
114 160 58 13 114 160 60 14 114 1.6.0..64 ..15
COUNTY SA ION DIST# STATE OF CALIF DEPT OF PUB STATE OF CALIF NIA
10844 ve - 2501 PULLMAN ST 2501 Pullman
ountain Valley CA 92708 SANTA ANA CA 92705 Santa A 92705
114 16071 16 114 160 72 17 114 160 73 18
PACIFIC ENVIRO DESIGN \ Beach Wetlands Conservancy Hunti STATE OF CALIF D OF PUB
5576 Dover St #200 PO Box 5903 2501 PUL T
Chino CA 91710 Huntington Beach CA 92615 SANTA CA 92705
114 160 74 19 114 200 07 20 114 200 09 21 i-
STATE OF CALIF DEPT OF PUB COUNTY OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITAT DIST#1
2501 PULLMAN ST P O BOX 4048 10844 Ellis Av
SANTA ANA CA 92705 SANTA ANA CA 92702 Fountai a ley CA 92708
114 200 10 22 149 063 21 23 149 063 22 24
COUNTY SANIT IST#1 Gerald G Noser Robert A Shupp
10844 Ellis 21901 Oceanbreeze Ln \ 21911 Summerwind Ln
Foun alley CA 92708 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646
C 41 q 53q
,way,City Clerk
ting',,an Beach : ....--
he City Clerk •,._.>>.� �m raw �' .'�, - - --
�
Box 1 �" Ft $ eF. j_t u.S.aOsr�;
;each,CA 92648 p. r
�+�• . � MAY 9�os r- •—• � �� ! ` 4 .
CAL 1 F• ME T E R-j r a
6970052d r- �" a
c4
149 063 23 at10
GT��BF 9 fl L JAs L E ter-�.p�. .
'fo 21 Sununernvid`Lp
9� , : `si
y ---Huntington-Bek U� 9,2k6__1- -------
y Ca -
LEGAL NOTICE — PUBLIC HEARING
s
;1,11111111 fill 111111.111...11
roll 9 9s j
g' 'B-9� 61(� ry ,qs s!. �s .T a i ��� i~l�1 � �� �►
P.}
h,CA92648 r4 tJI bLaRa,2 hana�L. � -
- • - �� fir° Qs:�
,,,•'� 149 06410
Ian M McGeary
fy�F `\ 21932 Sun4%1envin1d'-n►"A
9y Huntinaton 4.. _
Q
LEGAL NOTICE — PUBLIC HEARING_ It11,1111it,t1,,,1„1,11,ftiit.t I;i111llllf�,lLifll��llfflf�tl,i�lilflililtlll 1 '
,...vc,..,v - - - -.__--- -----fy. p• 4 5 S .� �q AS h .t� rar s•ss i 7" j
`' e w
------ -r C.4 L 1 E. 1. !.1 E f E R—�
970052t
137 ;
• 149 341 08 76
9 ;�'-�;��. nMel�da Cir �•D . `�D � �l 2.
F �` t
main eton Beach CA 92646 �9•/�2.1� P,iu�4 G�kCl Q ?,
LEGAL NOTICE — PUBLIC HEARING
ODY 115 -5i
10 063 23 25
� 149 063 24 26 149 063 25 27
�. —AZZ,4
=lZlpkt-J c';6 Ar ri1 .�� Janos Pinter Claire Hansford-Ringer
21921 Summerwind Ln 6 21952 Harborbreeze Ln 21942 Harborbreeze Ln
Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646
149 064 01 28 149 064 02 29 149 064 03 30
Francine E Bernard David P Lenhardt Alan David Costa
9932 Baybreeze Dr 9922 Baybreeze Dr 21852 Summerwind Ln
Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646
149 064 04 31 149 064 05 32 149 064 06 33
Gerald W Arriola Albert A Arellano Jr. Alan L Fritchoff
21872 Summerwind Ln 21882 Summerwind Ln 21892 Summerwind Ln
Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646
\ 149 064 07 34 149 064 08 35 14906409. 36
" Paul &Antoinette Catani Michael John Kasler Kenneth Miller
21902 Summerwind Ln 21912 Summerwind Ln 21922 Summerwind Ln
Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646
149 064 10 37_ _ 149 064 11 38 149 064 12 39
Ian M McGeary Wei-Shih Hsieh Robert Carl Kramer
21932 Swnmerwind Ln 508 W Balboa Blvd 21952 Sunvnerwind Ln
Huntington Beach CA 92646 Newport Beach CA 92661 Huntington Beach CA 92646
149 064 13 40 149 064 14 41 149 064 15 42
Arland R Bassett Michael S Callison Sal F Dipasquale
21962 Sununerwind Ln 21972 Summerwind Ln 21982 Summerwind Ln
Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646
149 064 16 43 149 064 17 44 149 065 01 45
; Jose M &Elsa Fernandez Albert&Christi Granado David P Turner
�.21992 Summerwind Ln 21996 Summerwind Ln 9932 Oceancrest Dr
Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646
149 065 02 46 149 065 03 47 149 065 04 48
Mark A&Linda Goodfellow Mitchell F Keil Timothy Robert Buhl
21781 Summerwind Ln 21791 Summerwind Ln 4626 Cortland Dr
' Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Corona Del Mar CA 92625
149 065 05 49 149 065 06 50 149 065 07 51
John M&Deborah K Hazlin III John Bruce Hosmer Lawrence A Lanza
21811 Summerwind Ln 4423 Woodfield Blvd 21831 Summerwind Ln
Huntington Beach CA 92646 Boca Raton FL 33434 Huntington Beach CA 92646
149 065 08 52 149 065 09 53 149 065 10 54
Daniel Ponce Brent E Kamps Jeffery B Taylor
21841 Summerwind Ln 21861 Summerwind Ln 21881 Summerwind Ln
Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646
CDpclS'3�'
149 065 11 55 149 066 01 56 149 11108 57
\; Richard DeNike Michael Trujillo COUNTY SANI ON DIST#1
y 21891 Sununerwind Ln 9941 Oceancrest Dr 10844 Ellis
Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646 F n Valley CA 92708
149 111 13 58 14911114 59 14911117 60
COUNTY SANIT IST#1 COUNTY SANI rTION DISTRI COUNTY SANI N DIST#1
10844E PO Box 811 PO Box 8
ountain Valley CA 92708 Foun n Valley CA 92728 Fou n Valley CA 92728
149 111 18 61 14911119 62 14911120 63
Frank J Moreno Francis&Ruby Foo RELIABLE WHOLESALE LUMB
V 4361 Rafael St 94412 Gateshead Dr PO Box 311
Irvine CA 92714 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92648
\ 149 112 01 64 149 112 02 65 149 112 03 66
Leonard M Kawabe Deirdre M Hurd Rudi Van Mil
9981 Oceancrest Dr 9971 Oceancrest Dr 9961 Oceancrest Dr
Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646
149 11301 67 149 113 02 68 149 113 03 69
Masuo Kawabe Robert E Knapper Leonard M Kawabe
9972 Oceancrest Dr 9962 Oceancrest Dr 9981 Oceancrest Dr
Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646
149 113 04 70 149 11305 71 149 11306 72
Frank C Horzewski Swasdi Pothikamjorn Morris Grayson
21792 Summerwind Ln 9642 Chevy Chase Dr 9951 Baybreeze Dr
Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646
149 221 03 73 149 321 01 74 149 321 15 75
Richard Joseph Battaglia COUNTY SANI ON DIST#1 John A Giannini
18872 Macarthur Blvd 10844 Elli e 22122 Tobarra
Irvine CA 92715 F ain Valley CA 92708 Mission Viejo CA 92692
e 149 341 08 76 149 341 09 77 149 341 10 78
Kenneth Lee - David C&Sherie M Franssen Dorothy V Bonar
9721 Melinda Cir 9731 Melinda Cir 9741 Melinda Cir
Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646
149 341 11 79 149 341 12 80 149 342 02 81
\ Don Hosokawa Thomas&Maryanne King Davoud Zahabian
8570 Rock Fish Cir 9761 Melinda Cir 9692 Melinda Cir
Fountain Valley CA 92708 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646
149 342 03 82 149 342 04 83 149 342 05 84
Harold F Montoya Dennis L Parker James&Joyce Muse
\ 9702 Melinda Cir 9722 Melinda Cir 9732 Melinda Cir
Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646
i
149 342 06 85 149 342 07 86 1493.4208 87
Betty E&Lee A Stephens Russell Carl Sandore Joel R Grundy
'--'9742 Melinda Cir 9731 Allison Cir 9721 Allison Cir
Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646
149 342 09 88 149 342 10 89 149 342 11 90
Jerry W Harmon Kathy Black William H Stilwell
`'41 Warmspring 9691 Allison Cir 9681 Allison Cir
Irvine CA 92714 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646
149 343 03 91 149 343 04 92 149 343 05 93
Ronald A Napier Jerry Falabella Christine A Padesky
22081 Jonesport Ln 22091 Jonesport Ln 22101 Jonesport Ln
Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646
149 344 01 94 149 344 02 95 149 344 03 96
Catherine Ellen Temming Thomas R Holmes John Trovarelli
9682 Allison Cir 9692 Allison Cir 9702 Allison Cir
Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646
149 344 04 97_ 149 344 05 98 149 344 06 99
Jeffrey Angus Domingo A Bonet John B Russo
22092 Jonesport Ln 902 E Leadora Ave 22112 Jonesport Ln
Huntington Beach CA 92646 Glendora CA 91741 Huntington Beach CA 92646
149 352 10 100 149 352 11 101 14935212 102
Paul E Mesmer L Clyde Wampler C Dudley&Barbara K Buell
9572 Onset Cir 9582 Onset Cir 9592 Onset Cir
Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646
149 352 13. 103 149 352 14 104 149 352 15 105
Edward&Pamela D Elick Robert E Laughlin Frances M Adams
�9602 Onset Cir - 22191 Cape May Ln 22201. Cape May Ln
Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646
149 352 16 106 149 352 17 107 149 352 18 108
Christopher Lee Mangum Alyn G Anderson Steven E Dimond
\ 9601 Castine Dr 9591 Castine Dr 9581 Castine Dr
Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646
149 352 19 109 149 352 20 110 149 353 01 111
\ James A Shearn Jr. Prakash J Kabre Corinne M McCarron
9571 Castine Dr 9551 Castine Dr 22111 Jonesport Ln
Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646
149 353 02 112 149 353 03 113 149 35304 114
Jeff Malone Joseph M&Rubirose R Gerosa Robert G Beimer
22121 Jonesport Ln 22131 Jonesport Ln 718 Nob Cir
Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Vista CA 92084
149 353 05 115 149 354 01 116 149 354 02 117
Curtis C Holmes Bill McIntosh Wendell R Adams
22172 Cape May Ln 22122 Jonesport Ln 22132 Jonesport Ln
Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646
149 354 03 118 149 354 04 119 149 354 05 126
Jenne Martin Judith E Frye Robert L Arutunian
22142 Jonesport Ln 22152 Jonesport Ln 16291 Sundancer Ln
Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92649
149 354 06 121 149 361 05 122 149 361 06 123
Jacob Ziv Harold H Walsh Richard W Schafer
22202 Cape May Ln 9532 Castine Dr 22261 Kittery Cir
Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646
149 361 07 124 149 361 08 .125 149 361 09 126.
Calvin Francis Walker Dewey D Davide Frank P Reynolds
22271 Kittery Cir PO Box F 22281 Kittery Cir
Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92646
149 361 10 127 . 149 361 11 128 149 361 12 129
�j Joseph A&Frieda N Weber William E McCraney Merlin E Rudd
22272 Kittery Cir 22262 Kittery Cir 9552 Castine Dr
Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646
149 361 13 130 149 361 14 131 1.4936201 132
\. Steven R Hayashi Christopher L Mangum Terry A Fyffe
9572 Castine Dr 9582 Castine Dr 22362 Wallingford Ln .
Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646
149 371 26 133 149 371 27 134 149 371 28 135
Dale R Holmsen R Steven Peters Tom Angelovic
3247 Karen Ave 22411 Harwich.Ln 22421 Harwich Ln
Long Beach CA 90808 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646
149 371 29 136 149 371 30 137 149 371 31 138
Harvey N Rudy R Steven Peters Edward &Ruth Uliasz
PO Box 26134 22412 Wallingford Ln 22392 Wallingford Ln
Santa Ana CA 92799 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646
149 371 32 139 149 371 33 140 149 371 34 141
Albert&Carol Lee Christian&Francois Phancao Terry A Fyffe
22382 Wallingford Ln 22372 Wallingford Ln 22362 Wallingford Ln
Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646
149 371 35 142 149 371 36 143 149 372 18 144
Edward M Beram Dale Erwin Paul C Bush
"V 22352 Wallingford Ln PO Box 2908 22391 Wallingford Ln
Huntington Beach CA 92646 La Habra CA 90632 Huntington Beach CA 92646
cod �s-3q
14-9 372 19 145 149 372 20 146 42234101
LINTY Bruce Joel Brandt Gerald J Souza ORANG FLOOD CO
22381 Wallingford Ln 22361 Wallingford Ln
Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646
J
42234107 148 422 34108 149 A 3 11
ORN OUNTY FLOOD CO GRAN UNTY FLOOD CO i
Z 3 Ua w qI .
AP 1y4-3�i-3 �
as 39A Gua&.
i
CrD612 95�3�
PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST`B"
MAILING LABELS - 4/3/95
President 1 Huntington�Harbq10 Edna Littlebury 17
H.B. Chamber of Commerce P. O. Box79 Golden St.Mob. Hm. Owners Leag.
2210 Main Street,Suite 200 Sunset Be 11021 Magnolia Blvd.
Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Garden Grove,CA 92642
Judy Legan 2 Pacific Coast Archa gical 18
H.B./F.V. Board of Realtors Society,Inc.
8101 Slater Ave. P.O. 926
Huntington Beach,CA 92647 C esa,CA 92627
Attn:Jane Gothold
President 3 William D. Holman 11 County of Orangg4WA4A 19
Amigos De Bolsa Chica Pacific Coast Homes Michael M. ne,Dir.
P. O. Box 3748 23 Corporate Plaza,Suite 250 P.O. 48
Huntington Beach,CA 92605 Newport Beach CA 92660-7912 Sa Ana,CA 92702-4048
Mr.Tom Zanic 12 Planning De n 19
Seacliff Partners Orange my EMA
520 Broadway Ste. 100 P. O. x 4048
Santa Monica,CA San a Ana,CA 92702-4048
President 5 Pres.,H.B. Hist. Soci 13 County of Orange/ 19
Huntington Beach Tomorrow C/O Newlan se Museum Thomas athe
411 6th St. 19820 Be Blvd. P. O.Box
Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Huntin n Beach,CA 92648 Santa An ,CA 92702-4048
Julie Vandermo 6 Chairperson 14 County of Ora 19
BIA-OC Historical Res es Bd. Bob Fish r.
9 E ve Circle#100 Comm. ices Dept. P.O. 4048
I ne Ca 92714-6734 2000 ain St. Sa a Ana,CA 92702-4048
Hun 'ton Beach,CA 92648
Richard Spi 7 Council on A 15 Planning Dir. 20
SCZ
1706 Or e Ave. City of Costa Mesa
81th, 12th Floor Hunti on Beach,CA 92648 P.O.Box 1200,CA 90017 Costa Mesa,CA 92628-1200
E.T.I. Corr 0 8 Dominick amo 16 Planning Dir. 21
Mary Seaclif meowners Assoc. City of Fou a ey
202 Eastwood Cir. 681 cenic Bay Lane 102 er Ave.
Hun ington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Fqwffain Valley,CA 92708
Tom Ryan,Environmental 9 Seacliff 16 Planning Di rec 22
Board Chairman Jeff el City orestmin
in ter
8852 Luss Drive 193 Shady Harbor Circle 820ster Blvd.
Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92648 W ,CA 92683
g:1ab1es\phnib1s
PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST"B"
MAILING LABELS - 4/3/95
Planning Director 23 James Jones 30 OC Cou�HarborBeach 35
City of Seal Ocean View E entary and Par211 Eig School di P. O. Bo
Seal B ch,CA 90740 1720 nehurst Lane San na,CA 92702-4048
Huntington Beach CA 92647
CA Coastal Commission 24 Ron Frazier 31 Cheryle Browning 36
Theresa Henry Westminster Sc District Meadowlar
245 W. Broadway,Ste 380 14121 Ce ood Avenue 167 osevelt Lane
Long Bch,CA 90802 West ster CA 92683 Huntington Beach,CA 92649
California Coastal Commission 24 Patricia Koch 32 Sally Gra 36
South District Office HB Union H' chool Disrict Mead ark Area
245 W. Broadway No. 380 10251 Y town Avenue 51 Gelding Circle
Long Beach,CA 92802-4458 Hunti on Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92649
Robert Joseph 25 David Hagen 32
Caltrans Dis 12 HB Union Hi chool district Koll Company 37
2501 Pu an St. 10251 Yor wn 7711 Center Avenue,#215
Sant a,CA 92705 Hunting Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92647
Director 26 Huntington Beach 33
Local Solid Waste Enf. Attn: Pat Roger ude
O.C. >AA
re ncy 7777 Edin Ave, #300
P.O. B Hunting each CA 92647
Santa92702
New Growth CoopRnator 27 CSA 33
Huntington B Post Office 730 El Camin ay#200
6771 Wa r Ave. Tustin,CA 80
Hunti on Beach,CA 92647
Marc Ecker 28 Goldenwest onwest
34
Fountain Va Attn: Fred O
Element School District 15744 G t.
1721 ak Street Hun ti on Beach CA 92647
Fo ain Valley CA 92708
Dr. Duane • no 29 Country View es HOA 35
HB City mentary School Dist. Carrie Th s
PO B 71 6642 tter Drive
H tington Beach,CA 92626 H ngton Beach CA 92648
Jerry Buch n 29 Country View E es HOA 35
HB Ci ementary School Dist. Gerry Chap
204 Craimer Lane 6742 S Circle
H tington Beach,CA 92648 Hu gton Beach CA 92648
g:1ab1es\phn1bls
OCTD APPEAL
149 111 18 149 111 18 149 111 18
OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT
21782-11 BROOKHURST 21782 12 BROOKHURST 21782 13 BROOKHURST
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 9264
149 111 18 149 111 20 149 111 20
OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT
21782 14 BROOKHURST 21792 16 BROOKHURST 21792 17 BROOKHURST
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 9264
149 111 20 JOHN D ELY 149 063 23
OCCUPANT 22051 HULA CIRCLE RALPH& APRIL CARNEVALE
21792 18 BROOKHURST HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 RR 1 BOX 22
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 THVIBERVILLE, VA 22853-9737
149 341 08 County Sanitation Districts of OC T. HOFFMAN
KENNETH& TERESA LEE Attn: Dave Ludwin 9362 GATESHEAD
PO BOX 2092 PO Box 8127 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 9264
GARDENA, CA 90247 Fountain Valley, Ca 92728-8127
114 160 40 JOHN WARDE BERNICE&WILLIAM MALKIN
GSA REAL ESTATE 9682 MELINDA CIRCLE 22351 HARWICH LANE
645 N. ROSS STREET, #3 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 9264
SANTA ANA, CA 92701-4028
I
i
cD P ifs
g:labels:form
I
' r
CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST
SUBJECT: 3q Luri aAcz-, Nd . q5 32
DEPARTMENT: A MEETING DATE: S e__o - � C�
CONTACT:'l`'�l l.. +� e �fo-2 �___._.-PHONE:
N/A YES NO
Is the notice attached?
( ) ( ) Do the Heading and Closing of Notice reflect City Council (and/or
Redevelopment Agency)hearing?
( ) ( ) Are the date, day and time of the public hearing correct?
( ) ( ) If an appeal, is the appellant's name included in the notice? l�,�p�?Iel,4
dp
( ) ( ) If Coastal Development Permit,does the notice include appeal language?
Is there an Environmental Status to be approved by Council?
( ) ( ) Is a map attached for publication?
( ) ( ) Is a larger ad required? Size
( ) ( ( ) Is the verification statement attached indicating the source and accuracy of the
mailing list?
( ) ) ( ) Are the applicant's name and address part of the mailing labels?
( ) ( ) Are the appellant's name and address part of the mailing labels?
( ) ( ) If Coastal Development Permit, is the Coastal Commission part of the mailing
labels?
( ) ( ) If Coastal Development Permit,are the Resident labels attached?
Is the33343 report attached?,(Economic Development Dept. items only)
Please complete the following:
1. Minimum days from publication to hearing date '
2. Number of times to be published
3. Number of days between publications 11�i4
SUSAN W. CASE
OWNERSHIP LISTING SERVICE
917 Glenneyre Street, Suite 7
Laguna Beach, California 92651
714/494-6105
FAX: 714/494-7418
Certification of Property Ownership List
THE ATTACHED LIST REPRESENTS THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PROPERTY
OWNERS LOCATED WITHIN 300 FEET OF THE EXTERIOR BOUNDARIES OF THE
PROPERTY LOCATED AT SEE ATTACHED MAP
THIS INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED FROM THE LATEST
ORANGE COUNTY ASSESSMENT ROLLS, OCTOBER 31 1995
SUSAN W. CASE
Publish �� �
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING rips r4Vf G
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH �yl�G
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday, May 20, 1996, at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chambers,
2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following items:
<I COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO.95-39/VARIANCE NO. 95-32 (SANITATION
DISTRICT) (APPEAL): Applicant/Appellant: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Request: An appeal of the Planning Commission's approval of Coastal Development Permit No.
95-39 and Variance No. 95-32 for a new 3,200 square foot pump station and the reconstruction of
an existing hydraulic surge tower. The approval included a variance for an 86 foot high tower in
lieu of maximum 40 foot height permitted by the code. The County Sanitation Districts of Orange
County is appealing two(2)conditions of approval regarding landscaping of the site and City
participation in a facilities master plan for the treatment plant. Location: 22212 Brookhurst
(approximately 2,200 feet north of Pacific Coast Highway,adjacent to the Santa Ana River).
Project Planner: Mary Beth Broeren
❑ 2. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-84 WITH SPECIAL PERMITS/COASTAL
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 95-25/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO.95-25
(STANDARD MARKET)(APPEAL): Applicant: Richard A.Harlow Appellant: Mayor Dave
Sullivan Request: To construct a 9,475 square foot,two-story commercial building with special
permits for waivers from alley dedication,rear yard setback,and build-to line on Main Street and
on Walnut Avenue;and participation in the in-lieu parking fee program. Location: 126 Main
Street(southeast comer of Main Street and Walnut Avenue). Project Planner: Susan Pierce
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item(s)# 1 is covered by Environmental Impact Report State Clearing
House No. 88012008 certified by the Board of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County in .
June, 1989 and Supplement No. 3 to the Environmental Impact Report certified by the Board of Directors
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County in January, 1995.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item(s)# 1 is located in the appealable jurisdiction of the Coastal Zone
and includes Coastal Development Permit No. 95-39, filed on November 13, 1995, in conjunction with the
above request.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item(s)#2 is located in the non-appealable jurisdiction of the Coastal
Zone and includes Coastal Development Permit No. 95-25, filed on September 18, 1995, in conjunction
with the above request.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that initial environmental assessments for the above items were processed
and completed in accordance with the California Quality Act. It was determined that Item(s)# 2 ,with
mitigation,would not have any significant environmental effects and that a mitigated negative declaration is
warranted. Prior to acting on the appeal,the City Council must review and act on the negative declaration.
These environmental assessments are on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development
Department, 2000 Main Street,and are available for public inspection and comment by contacting the
Community Development Department,or by telephoning(714)536-5271.
(cclg10520)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Coastal Development Permit hearing consists of a staff report,
public hearing, City Council discussion and action. Item(s)#2 is not appealable to the California Coastal
Commission. Item(s)# 1 may be appealed to the Coastal Commission, 245 W. Broadway, Suite 380,Long
Beach, CA 90801-1450, following City Council action or unless Title 14, Section 13573 of the California
Administrative Code is applicable.
ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City Clerk's Office, 2000 Main Street,
Huntington Beach, California 92648,for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be
available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office after May 16, 1996.
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence
for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you
may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in
this notice,or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to,the public hearing. If there are
any fiirther questions please call the Planning Division at 536-5271 and refer to the above item. Direct
your written communications to the City Clerk.
Connie Brockway, City Clerk
City of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street,2nd Floor
Huntington Beach, California 92648
(714)536-5227
(cclg)0520)
City of Huntington Beach
[Claim
P.O.BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648
Fromm tl+e ;
\� CONNIE BROCKWAY
dak of.• .� �
CITY CLERK
(714)536-5227
f
c2� csY.t C.6c� wao ¢.L)P'
Cv,,,.,,r, �s s��►,.— �.� �h� C.ti �• `�PS�cal l J"� �
V-zt
ksY(3Y
kway, City Clerk
Beach
Itin ton B y g
:he City Clerk
Box 190 )6 �
u.s.FucraGci :-3each, CA 9264$ Pt ire to A. F ra sw �r MAY 9 9<r _CAL 1 F e S G C`2'?t _-01
141906323, ZZA
21921 Summe i - =� •°
-Hnntinnton Beach 5- /
— Z
LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING
11g1�,g,1,l,Ilg,gig�l�ilggl��lggJ,l,lig�lgg�i,glgf,t�lllg�gll -.-
:,ity �-
190 MAID 9'96
-h CA 92648
c
CALIF. �.T_ Fy7%,rc t a.
i
149 064 10 -
T�ti k Ian M McGeary -
.F �F 21932 Suni'oexwin'Lnv ",%
9y Huntineton Ba+wh CA ?646 `�►
LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING I,I„1,ij„II;�,I1„� I ,II,,,I,I,,,III }
11 tits 11111311111111hll11111111
zz
9 -z!
,C— �?��'u7 r„�•d !S'So I�Za 6f i'A t4
„..�r.., !.1E rER •. �, a
149 341 08
76 '
Kenneth Lee
4"�, -" \:,:972tMelinda Cir
-tin H�n eton B I,
-t each CA 92646 C-9.1Ar(L.0 &m A G�4 �► Z
LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING
Connie Brockway,City Clerk
City of Huntington Beach
Office of the City Clerk 6C� iJ.S.FOSL;i,
P.O.Box 190
Huntington Beach,CA 92648
M $d'ea� TTd ,i"baaF7 3Y3sa r ?' ME f EF �.
7 \�,/hl� -.. ....,y. L'AL1F• �"��-�- t��0�0052� w r,, �
e 149 341 08 76
- d Kenneth Lee
INGr°�,� `.t`• _.\.,,97?�Melinda Cir
0 \MCCRFCB�,FG �: H nainaton Beach CA 92646
-- F9
s
o C):DV.:'-``
� r
BOUNTY Ca LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING7.
..,.........r....
_
Connie Brockway,City Clerk
City of Huntington Beach �.__�. 1 -�.•��..•'s_ >.a...�. . U �`�< -�� : j
/�G N �. }
`Z�.. Bn "U.S.PU �^
Office of the City Clerk
P.O.Box 190 I
>_ �a ter•.
e 4h 4 L
Huntington Beach,CA 92648 x•r.a[ � �z � a +� � .{ _ •
` i
qq tib�S �a
;ss �� S t 3 -'si METER
C
AL1 9700524
� F
' T114 INGT ( BAN 60 ER 4 �rre02
oy�F P 028d Af�d t Beach C 9 h�rs
1 `Q—[NC9RPOR,,IfO �� P V i
y \. orA 9265 �,: ; A
FOOUNrY �a� LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING
Connie Brockway,City Clerk
City of Huntington Beach _... R ;�,
Office of the City Clerk F v ;U.S.ppera ;
P.O.Box 190 MY 9 96 =
Huntington Beach,CA 92648a/r r"
^.. �. CALIF �: 11F97001E2A 'A, :<. A
/gym dD!° 93- ?
149 063 23 L' S :✓�Czzt!
I NG m
p'c `��pRPORAlf� �F 21921 Sumernvind Ln �,
-- 9y
Hnntin�tnn Bea 1i /�-
Q
COUNTY
LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING
III,...I,III„�{��IPIIP�I��{DPP{PI�iiP�l���l��fP{�FP 11���11
77— — - - - -
Connie Brockway,City Clerk
City of Huntington Beach r_. s> _ _ -
,G a;e
Office of the City Clerk F+ ��,+�� sr ^r ��4 �—� `' ll.S.POS �tr
P.O. Box 190
Huntington Beach,CA 92648 MAY 9'96 -1, y y
mf. o
CAL 1
149 064 10 37�
INGTpy c Ian M McGeary
41 21932 Suniie�rwind Ln
y Huntineton f3 .Adi CA 2646}"�'ti
pOUNTY cQ� LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING
IfPI���iI�1�iI�P�IP;I�IIPP��IIPI I►II�i�I{��Is�i���f�l�ll��lt,i��;iL��i�l�;�ll)
t •
3
l
as, 1
a .
1
Brockway,City Clerk
of Huntington Beach _ _...._.._.�. ,... -. :_.
Office of the City Clerk ETUR
P.O.BOX 199 To
SENDER }1 HAY 9 JG
Hunting ton Beach,CA 92648 j1:"�'•'F� >}•' 9 5, +?a Ae is m cl n !" :.�` ; `�
.i. 0 MOVED,VFT
RL 1E•• 1..:..:_ } 970!'sl ^ '. r e ;.
�FORWARDI p
EMPTEORDER EXPIRED
`
/ 0 UNCLAIMED^ , 4�5/11l:'9' SA14TA PIP C�1 i'_�'_'i
❑NO SUCH REFUSED
}+ STREET
❑NO SUCH NUMBER
ty Y ❑INSUFFICIENT ADDRESS i r
a ❑NO 114All RECEPTACLE 149 065 06 50
I ❑TEAIPORARILYAWAY John Bruce Hosmer
�NSINGTp o vacalvr P.51
ROUTE No. 4423 Woodfield Blvd
.I �� =MGONPORI/F� �FA _DATE---Y I ....CARR/INITIALS Boca'_. Raton FL 33434
cpUNTY CP .";
LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING
mm
� n
s
0
b CO
August 5, 1996
Coastal Development Permit
for
Rebuilding of Surge Tower
Huntington Beach Treatment Plant
Jobs No. J-34-1 and P2-35-5
HIGHLIGHTS OF LANDSCAPING CHANGES
uantit
Description Before Now
Landscaping Area 150,000 sf. 200,000 sf.
Trees (includes 53 new 36" box Mexican Fan Palms) 290 ea. 333 ea.
Shrubs 2,000 ea. 2,300 ea.
Ground Cover 35,000 sf. 44,000 sf.
Note: First work items in contract include perimeter landscaping
FUTURE
1. City to participate in development of"Aesthetics Element" of Districts New Strategic
Plan.
2. District to prepare plans and specifications for added landscaping and screening
along southerly boundary (Santa Ana River to Brookhurst Street).
TMD:jrs
J AW P DOC\DAW E S\080596.D I A
CSDOC 0 P.O.Box 8127 0 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 0 (714)962-2411
C
I •
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
Ss.
County of Orange )
I am a Citizen 'of the United States and a PUBLIC NOTICE 11-NOTICE IS" HEREBY consists of a staff report,
GIVEN that.Item(.) 0
1 is public hearing,City Council
resident of the County aforesaid; I am NOTICE OF covered byEnvironmental discussion and action.
`I PUBLIC HEARING; i . "p port State Clear- Item(s) #2 Is not appeal-
13EFORE THE CITY ' ing-House No. 88012008 able to the California
over.the age of eighteen years, and not a . certified by the Board of Coastal Commisslon.
l:OUNCILOFTHE
Directors County Sanitation Item(s) #1 may be ap-
party to or interested in the below CITY OF.- Districts of Orange County pealed to.the Coastal Com-
HUNTINGTON BEACH in June, 1989 and Supple- mission,245 W.Broadway,
entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of NOTICE IS HEREBY ment No. 3 to the"Environ-.Suite 380, Long Beach,CA
GIVEN that on Monday mental Impact Report certl-;90801-1450,-following City
May 20, 1996, at-7:00 PM fied by the Board of direr-1 Council action or unless
the HUNTINGTON BEACH INDEPENDENT, a in the City Council-Cham- tors county Sanitation dis-.Title 14, Section 13573 of
bers, 2000 Main Street,i tricts of Orange County In 1 the California Adminlstra-
news aper of general circulation, printed Huntington Beach,the.City. Janus 1995. five Code lsapplicable.
P b Council will hold a public NOTryCE IS HEREBY
hearing on the. followln G f ro .FILE: A request
I of the
and published in the City of Huntington g located
that Item(s) #1 Is proposed request son flee
items: ' located In the appealable in the City Clerk's Office,
Beach County of Orange State of COASTAL DEVELOP jurisdiction of'the Coastal 2000 Main Street, Hunting.
/ / MENT PERMIT NO. 95-39/i Zone and Includes Coastal .ton Beach, California
California and that attached Notice is a VARIANCE- NO: .95-32, Development Permit- No. 92648, for Inspection by
(SANITATION DISTRICT)' 95-39, filed on November the public. A copy of the.
. true and complete copy. as was. printed (APPEAL):Application Dis 13, he a v conjunction staff report will be available
ant:.County Sanitation D(s•; with the above request. to Interested parties at the
tricts of Orange County.Re. NOTICE IS HEREBY City Clerk's Office after
and published in the Huntington Beach quest: An appeal of the GIVEN that Item(s) #2 Is May 16,1996.
Planning Commiss(on's ap•I located In the non- ALL INTERESTED PER. I
and Fountain Valley issues of said pro-, of Coastal Develop 1 appealable jurisdiction of. SONS are Invited to attend'
ment Permit No.95-39 and the Coastal Zone and In- said,hearing and express
newspaper to wit the issue(s) of• Variance No. 95-32 for al cludes Coast Development ,opinions or submitpevi-
• new 3,200 square footi Permit No. 95-25, filed on I dence .for or against the
pump station and the re-, September-18; 1995, In application as outlined
construction of an existingi conjunction with the above above.If you challenge the
hydraulic surge tower. The request. !City. Council'. action In i
approval Included a vary' NOTICE IS. HEREBY i court, you may be limited i
once for an 86 foot hlghl GIVEN that Initial environ-l to raising only those issues
tower In lieu of maximum mental assessments for the i you or someone else 1
40.foot height permitted b I above Items were pro- raised at the public hearing
May 9 1996 the code.The County Santt cessed and Completed In described In this notice, or
tation Districts of Orange, accordance with the Call- In written..correspondence
County is appealing two(2)l fornia Ouality Act. It was :delivered to the City at,or
conditions of approval re-' determined that Items)#2, prior to,the public hearing.
garding landscaping of the. with mitigation, would not If there are any further
site and`City participation: have any significant envi- questions please call the
In a".facilities master plan ronmental effects and that Planning Division at 536-
i declarer perjury under penalty of perj that for the treatment plant. Lo- a mitigated negative decla• 1 5271 'and refer to the
t cation: 22212 Brookhursti ration Is warranted.Prior to j above Item. Direct your
the foregoing is true and correct. (approximately 2,200 feet ,acting on the appeal, the i written communications to
north of Pacific Coast High- City Council must review the City Clerk. "
way, adjacent to the Santa ,and,act on the negative i Connie Brockway, 1
Ana River).Project Planner: ,declaration. These environ-_ City Clerk,City of Hun-
Mary Beth Broeren - mental assessments are on
2. CONDITIONAL USE lfile at the City of Hunting. tington Beach, 2000
PERMIT NO..95-84 WITH ton Beach-Community De. `Main Street,2nd Floor,
Executed on May 9, 1991, SPECIAL. PERMITS/ velopment Department, 'Huntington Beach,Cal-
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT 2000 Main Street, and are-,Ifornia 92648 (714)
at Costa Mesa, California. PERMIT NO. 95-25/NEGA. available for public inspec- :536.5227
TIVE DECLARATION NO.-tion and comment by con. .Published Huntington
95-25 (STANDARD MAR. tatting the Community De- Beach-Fountain Valley In-
KET).(APPEAL): Applicant: velopment Department,. or
Richard A. Harlow Appel. by.telephoning'(714) 536• dependent May 9,1996.
lant: Mayor Dave Sullivan 5271. 052-541
Request: To construct a NOTICE IS HEREBY
9,475 square foot, two- GIVEN that the Coastal Do-
story-commercial building velopment Permit hearing
with'special permits for " 1
waivers from alley dedica-
tion;rear yard setback,and ,
build-to line on Main Street
and on Walnut Avenue;
Signature and participation In the In
lieu parking fee program.
Location 126 Main Street
1 (southeast corner of Main
Street and Walnut Avenue):
Project Planner: Susan
--
�. CITY OF HUNT1NGTON BEACH
2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
CONNIE BROCKWAY
CITY CLERK
June 6, 1996
NOTICE OF ACTION
Conditional Approval of Coastal Development Permit No. 95-39
Variance No. 95-32
(3.200 s.q. Pump Station & Reconstruction_
of an Existing Hydraulic Surge Tower)
Applicant/Appellant: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Request: An appeal of the Planning Commission's approval of Coastal
Development Permit No. 95-39 and Variance No. 95-32 for anew 3,200 square
foot pump station and the reconstruction of an existing hydraulic surge tower.
The approval included a variance for an 86 foot high tower in lieu of maximum
40 foot height permitted by the code. The County Sanitation Districts of Orange
County is appealing two (2) conditions of approval regarding landscaping of the
site and City participation in a facilities master plan for the treatment plant.
Location: 22212 Brookhurst (approximately 2,200 feet north of Pacific Coast
Highway, adjacent to the Santa Ana River)
Coastal Status: Located in the appealable jurisdiction of the Coastal Zone and
includes Coastal Development Permit No. 95-39, filed on November 13, 1995, in
conjunction with the above request and notice is hereby given that this Coastal
Development Permit hearing consists of a staff report, public hearing, City
Council discussion and action. May be appealed to the Coastal Commission,
245 W. Broadway, Suite 380, Long Beach, CA 90801-1450, following City
Council action or unless Title 14, Section 13573 of the California Administrative
Code is applicable.
Environmental Status: Covered by Environmental Impact Report State
Clearing House No. 88012008 certified by the Board of Directors County
Sanitation Districts of Orange County in June, 1989 and Supplement No. 3 to
the Environmental Impact Report certified by the Board of Directors County
Sanitation Districts of Orange County in January, 1995.
On May 20, 1996, the Huntington Beach City Council approved the staff
recommendation to approve Coastal Development Permit No. 95-39 and Variance
No. 95-32 with findings and revised conditions (see attached) of approval as set forth
on Attachment No. 2 to the Request for Council Action dated 5/20/96 as amended to
change wording on Attachment 2.3 to read (iii) Implementation of a study of
landscaping possibilities along the Pacific Coast Highway side of the facility; also, that
(Telephone-714-536-5227)
i
Notice of Action
Coastal Development Permit
Page 2
the Council representatives to the Sanitation Board be notified of any meetings of
substance and further for plan to return to Council within 45 days in lieu of Planning
Commission.
Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, the action taken by the
City Council is final.
The City Council action on this Coastal Development is appealable to the Coastal
Commission pursuant to Public Resources Code S. 30603 and California Administrative
Code S. 13319, Title 14.
Pursuant to Public Resources Code S. 30603, an appeal by an aggrieved person must
be filed in writing, and addressed to:
California Coastal Commission
245 W. Broadway, Suite 380
POB 1450
Long Beach, California 90801-1450
The appeal period begins when the commission receives this notice of action and
continues for ten (10) working days. Applicants will be notified by the Coastal
Commission as to the date of the conclusion of the Commission's review period, and as
to whether or not an appeal has been filed. Applicants are advised not to begin
construction prior to that.
Provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code are such that an application
becomes null and void one (1) year after the final approval, unless actual construction
has begun.
Sincerely yours,
Connie Brockway, CIVIC
City Clerk
Enclosure: Statement of Conditions
Request for Council Action dated 5/20/96
cc: City Administrator
City Attorney
Community Development Director
g AagendaMstmtact\cc52096
Council/Agency Meeting Held: 5 �0 9%
Deferred/Continued to:
U;lr'Appr ved ❑ C ndi Tonally A proved Hied City Clerk's Si ature
Council Meeting Date: May 20, 1996 Department ID Number: CD 96-28
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
SUBMITTED TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
r
SUBMITTED BY: MICHAEL T. UBERUAGA, City Ad ' ra i
PREPARED BY: MELANIE S. FALLON, Community Development Direc� �-�-
SUBJECT: APPEAL OF COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 95-39/
VARIANCE NO. 95-32 (SANITATION DISTRICT)
Statement of issue,Funding Source,Recommended Action,Alternative Action(s),Analysis,Environmental St tus,Attachments)
i
j Statement of Issue:
Transmitted for'your consideration is an appeal by the Orange County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County (CSDOC) of the Planning Commission's approval of a project at Treatment
Plant No. 2, operated by the CSDOC and located between Brookhurst Street and the Santa
Ana River north of Pacific Coast Highway. Both entitlements, Coastal Development Permit
No. 95-39 and Variance No. 95-32, were approved on April 9, 1996.
The project consists of the construction of two structures: an 86 foot high hydraulic surge
tower and a 3,200 square foot pump station. Both structures will replace existing smaller
structures on the site. The variance was granted for the surge tower which exceeds the
maximum 40 foot height permitted for the property.
I
The CSDOC's appeal is based on two conditions of approval that address landscaping
concerns. The appellant has indicated that these conditions go beyond the scope of the
project's impact and are excessive. Moreover, the CSDOC states that compliance with all
aspects of the conditions will cause a significant delay in the hydraulic surge tower project.
Staff has worked with the CSDOC staff on language that balances the City's and the
CSDOC's concerns and recommends the City Council approve the project with revised
conditions of approval. The suggested conditions reflect the essence of the Planning
Commission's approval but provide for a phased approach which the CSDOC believes is
attainable given its project timetable, procedural requirements and budgeting_constraints.
Funding Source: Not applicable. j
i
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: May 20, 1996 DEPARTMENT_ID NUMBER: CD 96-28
Recommended Actions:
A. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
Motion to:
1. "Uphold the Planning Commission's action and approve Coastal Development Permit No. 95-
39Nariance No. 95-32 with findings and conditions of approval (ATTACHMENT NO. 1)."
Planning Commission Action on April 9, 1996:
THE MOTION MADE BY KERINS, SECONDED BY LIVENGOOD, TO APPROVE COASTAL
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 95-39NARIANCE NO. 95-32 WITH FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS
FOR APPROVAL (ATTACHMENT NO. 1) CARRIED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: LIVENGOOD, BIDDLE, HOLDEN, KERINS, TILLOTSON, SPEAKER
NOES:. NONE
ABSENT: GORMAN
ABSTAIN: NONE
MOTION PASSED
B. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: No S-3a 9'
Motion to:
1. "Approve Coastal Development Permit No. 95-39&ith findings and revised conditions of
approval (ATTACHMENT NO. 2)."
Alternative Action(s):
The City Council may make the following alternative motions:
1. "Continue Coastal Development Permit No. 95-39Nariance No. 95-32 and direct staff
accordingly."
2. "Deny Coastal Development Permit No. 95-39Nariance No. 95-32."
CD96-28.DOC -2- 05/08/96 11:43 AM
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: May 20, 1996 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD 96-28
Analysis:
A. PROJECT PROPOSAL:
Applicant/Appellant: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, P.O. Box 8127,
Fountain Valley, CA 92728
Location: 22212 Brookhurst Street (east of Brookhurst Street, west of Santa Ana
River and north Pacific Coast Highway)
Coastal Development Permit No. 95-39 represents a request for the following:
A. To construct a 3,200 square foot pump station pursuant to Section 989.5.2 of the
Huntington Beach Local Coastal Program (LCP).
B. To construct an 86 foot high hydraulic surge tower, pursuant to Section 989.5.2 of
the LCP. -
The proposed pump station will replace an existing, smaller station that is approximately 400
square feet and seven feet high. The new pump station will be located in the vicinity of the
existing station along Brookhurst Street, near the main entrance to the treatment plant, and
is approximately 24 feet high. In general, pump stations are required when fluid cannot be
transported via gravity flow. A sewage treatment plant cannot have a direct connection to a
water system; consequently, a physical air gap (separation) is required. A pump station is
necessary to pump the water from the air gap tank. The County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County (CSDOC) reports that as part of their long range construction plans, they.
had planned to build a new facility to accommodate demand. However, a pump station that
is larger than originally planned is necessary because of City of Huntington Beach Fire
Department requirements.
There are currently two surge towers, No. 1 and No. 2, at the project site. The surge towers
reduce surges in wastewater flow that could otherwise damage outfall pipes that carry
treated wastewater to the Pacific Ocean. The applicant proposes to demolish existing Surge
Tower No. 1 ( 55.5 feet high; MSL 69 feet) and replace it with the proposed 86 foot high
structure (98 feet MSL) which will have an inside diameter of 26 feet. The new tower will
also be called Surge Tower No.'1 and will be located approximately 400 feet closer to Pacific
Coast Highway, at a distance of approximately 1,200 feet from the roadway. The applicant
has indicated that this new location is necessary because of the presence of seismic faults
at the location of existing Surge Tower No. 1. Similar to the existing Surge Tower No. 1, the
proposed surge tower will have a spiral staircase wrapped around the outside to allow
access for inspections. Both surge towers will be painted.gray.
[Please note that the LCP measures height from top of curb, referred to as "grade" in this
report. However, the CSDOC uses mean sea level (MSL) when reporting the height of
CD96-28.DOC -3- 05/08/96 11:43 AM
i
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: May 20, 1996 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD 96-28
structures. There is an approximate 12 foot differential between MSL and grade for the
project site. Thus, the CSDOC reports the proposed Surge Tower No. 1 at 98 feet MSL; this
is the equivalent of 86 feet from grade. Both measurements are provided throughout this
report.]
Variance No. 95-32 is a request to permit an 86 foot high surge tower in lieu of 40 ft.
(exceeds maximum building height by 46 feet) pursuant to Section 9510.4 of the LCP. The
applicant has indicated that the variance request is necessary in order to accommodate
projected flows. According to studies done for the applicant, the maximum water surface
level could reach 96 feet (MSL). Because this is higher than existing Surge Tower No. 2
(76.5 feet grade; 88 feet MSL), it was recommended that the new Surge Tower No. 1 be built
98 feet high(MSL).
B. APPEAL:
On April 19, 1996 the CSDOC appealed the Planning Commission's action. Specifically, the
appeal focuses on Conditions of Approval Nos. 2 and 3 which address landscaping of the
site and the participation of the City in a strategic plan for the treatment plant. The appeal
letter states that the conditions are unreasonable. The CSDOC also suggests alternative
language for a condition that speaks to landscaping concerns. (Attachment No. 3)
C. BACKGROUND:
On January 10, 1996, the Zoning Administrator approved the subject coastal development
permit and variance request with conditions of approval finding that the project was
necessary.for the public welfare. The project was appealed by Councilmember Harman on
January 18, 1996. His appeal letter noted that there will be negative visual impacts from
Pacific Coast Highway. On January 23, 1996, the applicant also appealed the project
because of two conditions of approval pertaining to water issues. The water issues included
the purchase of reclaimed water used to irrigate landscaping (Condition of Approval No. 7g,
as approved by the Zoning Administrator) and the number of pipes that will be installed
(Condition of Approval No. 7c); both were conditions of approval from the Department of
Public Works. Staff worked with the CSDOC to resolve all of the appeal issues. Prior to the
April 9, 1996 Planning Commission meeting, the applicant's appeal concerns were resolved
and there was apparent agreement on the conditions of approval that addressed
landscaping concerns.
D. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION:
The proposed surge tower at Treatment Plant No. 2 is clearly visible from many vantage
points along Pacific Coast Highway, from the bridge that crosses into Newport Beach
northwest to Brookhurst Street. Views of the site from Pacific Coast Highway were the
subject of the initial appeal to the Planning Commission by Councilmember Harman and
were the primary concern at the April 9, 1996 Planning Commission meeting. Consequently,
CD96-28.DOC -4- 05/08/96 11:43 AM
I
4. The use shall comply with the following:
a. Insure that the water system is capable of meeting the required fire flow of 2500 GPM.
(FD)
b. The proposed water system improvements shall conform to the State Department of
Health Services California Code of Regulations, Title 17, including Section 7603 titled
"Location of Backflow Preventers, subsection(a); "Air-gap Separation." The water
service lateral between the property line and the air-gap tank shall be located a minimum
of six (6) inches above ground and painted medium blue, Dunn-Edwards No. 10-1-
VF51652, with white stenciling. The stenciling shall appear on both sides of the pipe with
the marking"City Potable Water" in one-inch letters repeated every 24 inches. (PW)
c. If the meters are not to be located in the public right-of-way, the applicant shall be
responsible for the preparation and execution of all utility easements/agreements required
by the City granting the City the same rights and privileges as if the meters were located in
the public right-of-way. These rights and privileges shall include (but are not limited to)
24 hour access, maintenance and testing. The City shall be responsible for the ownership
and maintenance of the water facilities/appurtenances between the mainline and up to and
including the meter assembly. (PW)
d. The water system design shall include appropriate water hammer protection, consistent
with documented civil engineering industry practices, and acceptable to the Water
Division. (PW)
e. The project shall be served by a minimum of one (1) water service connection from the
sixteen inch water main in Brookhurst Street. The service connection shall not be joined
together on the"public" side of the meter. (PW)
f. All existing water services shall be abandoned at the water main per City of Huntington
Beach Water Division's Standard Plans and Specifications prior to the City's final
acceptance of the proposed-water system improvements. This includes any irrigation
services currently serving the site. (PW)
g. The landscape areas shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner.
h. Note on plans: Fire extinguishers shall be provided and located in areas to comply with
the Huntington Beach Fire Code Standards.
5. The Planning Commission shall be notified in writing if any changes in structure height, floor
area, setbacks, building elevations or open space are proposed as a result of the plan check
process. The Planning Commission reserves the right to require that an amendment to the
original entitlement be processed if the proposed changes are of a substantial nature.
6. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable
material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them.
(Attachment No. 2-4)
INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS:
I. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State, and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and
standards.
2. The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality
Management District.
3. The applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit for work done in the public right-of-way.
4. Landscaping shall comply with Section 9607 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code.
5. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Coastal Development Permit No. 95-
39/Variance No. 95-32 if any violation of these conditions of the Huntington Beach
Ordinance Code occurs.
6. Coastal Development Permit No. 95-39/Variance No. 95-32 shall become null and void
unless exercised within one year of the date of final approval or such extension of time as
may be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Department of
Community Development a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date.
(Attachment No. 2-5)
Council/Agency Meeting Held: 5� 9io
Deferred/Continued to: r
R'Appr ved ❑ C ndi Tonally A provedd�[ Dpn�ied City Clerk's Si66ature
Council Meeting Date: Mdy 20, 19996 Department ID Number: CD 96-28
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
SUBMITTED TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
SUBMITTED BY: MICHAEL T. UBERUAGA, City Ad rra i
PREPARED BY: MELANIE S. FALLON, Community Development Direc� rLec_
SUBJECT: APPEAL OF COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 95-39/
VARIANCE NO.. 95-32 (SANITATION DISTRICT)
Statement of Issue,Funding Source,Recommended Action,Alternative Action(s),Analysis,Environments St tus,Attachment(s)
Statement of Issue:
Transmitted for your consideration is an appeal by the Orange County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County (CSDOC) of the Planning Commission's approval of a project at Treatment
Plant No. 2, operated by the CSDOC and located between Brookhurst Street and the Santa
Ana River north of Pacific Coast Highway. Both entitlements, Coastal Development Permit
No. 95-39 and Variance No. 95-32, were approved on April 9, 1996.
The project consists of the construction of two structures: an 86 foot high hydraulic surge
tower and a 3,200 square foot pump station. Both structures will replace existing smaller
structures on the site. The variance was granted for the surge tower which exceeds the
maximum 40 foot height permitted for the property.
The CSDOC's appeal is based on two conditions of approval that address landscaping
concerns. The appellant has indicated that these conditions go beyond the scope of the
project's impact and are excessive. Moreover, the CSDOC states that compliance with all
aspects of the conditions will cause a significant delay in the hydraulic surge tower project.
Staff has worked with the CSDOC staff on language that -balances the City's and the
CSDOC's concerns and recommends the City Council approve the project with revised
j conditions of approval. The suggested conditions reflect the essence of the Planning
Commission's approval but provide for a phased approach which the CSDOC believes is
attainable given its project timetable, procedural requirements and budgeting constraints.
Funding Source: Not applicable.
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: May 20, 1996 DEPARTMENT_ID NUMBER: CD 96-28
Recommended Actions:
A. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
Motion to:
1. "Uphold the Planning Commission's action and approve Coastal Development Permit No. 95-
39/Variance No. 95-32 with findings and conditions of approval (ATTACHMENT NO. 1)."
Planning Commission Action on April 9, 1996:
THE MOTION MADE BY KERINS, SECONDED BY LIVENGOOD, TO APPROVE COASTAL
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 95-39NARIANCE NO. 95-32 WITH FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS
FOR APPROVAL (ATTACHMENT NO. 1) CARRIED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: LIVENGOOD, BIDDLE, HOLDEN, KERINS, TILLOTSON, SPEAKER
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: GORMAN
ABSTAIN: NONE
MOTION PASSED
B. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: No q5-3a
Motion to:
1. "Approve Coastal Development Permit No. 95-39�vith findings and revised conditions of
approval (ATTACHMENT NO. 2)."
Alternative Action(s):
The City Council may make the following alternative motions:
1. "Continue Coastal Development Permit No. 95-39/Variance No. 95-32 and direct staff
accordingly."
2. "Deny Coastal Development Permit No. 95-39/Variance No. 95-32."
CD96-28.DOC -2- 05/08/96 11:43 AM
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: May 20, 1996 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD 96-28
Analysis:
A. PROJECT PROPOSAL:
Applicant/Appellant: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, P.O. Box 81'27,
Fountain Valley, CA 92728
Location: 22212 Brookhurst Street (east of Brookhurst Street, west of Santa Ana
River and north Pacific Coast Highway)
Coastal Development Permit No. 95-39 represents a request for the following:
A. To construct a 3,200 square foot pump station pursuant to Section 989.5.2 of the
Huntington Beach Local Coastal Program (LCP).
B. To construct an 86 foot high hydraulic surge tower, pursuant to Section 989.5.2 of
the LCP.
The proposed pump station will replace an existing, smaller station that is approximately 400
square feet and seven feet high. The new pump station will be located in the vicinity of the
existing station along Brookhurst Street, near the main entrance to the treatment plant, and
is approximately 24 feet high. In general, pump stations are required when fluid cannot be
transported via gravity flow. A sewage treatment plant cannot have a direct connection to a
water system; consequently, a physical air gap (separation) is required. A pump station is
necessary to pump the water from the air gap tank. The County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County (CSDOC) reports that as part of their long range construction plans, they
had planned to build a new facility to accommodate demand. However, a pump station that
is larger than originally planned is necessary because of City of Huntington Beach Fire
Department requirements.
There are currently two surge towers, No. 1 and No. 2, at the project site. The surge towers
reduce surges in wastewater flow that could otherwise damage outfall pipes that carry
treated wastewater to the Pacific Ocean. The applicant proposes to demolish existing Surge
Tower No. 1 ( 55.5 feet high; MSL 69 feet) and replace it with the proposed 86 foot high
structure (98 feet MSL) which will have an inside diameter of 26 feet. The new tower will
also be called Surge Tower No. 1 and will be located approximately 400 feet closer to Pacific
Coast Highway, at a distance of approximately 1,200 feet from the roadway. The applicant
has indicated that this new location is necessary because of the presence of seismic faults
at the location of existing Surge Tower No. 1. Similar to the existing Surge Tower No. 1, the
proposed surge tower will have a spiral staircase wrapped around the outside to allow
access for inspections. Both surge towers will be painted gray.
[Please note that the LCP measures height from top of curb, referred to as "grade" in this
report. However, the CSDOC uses mean sea level (MSL) when reporting the height of
CD96-28.DOC -3- 05/08/96 11:43 AM
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: May 20, 1996 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD 96-28
structures. There is an approximate 12 foot differential between MSL and grade for the
project site. Thus, the CSDOC reports the proposed Surge Tower No. 1 at 98 feet MSL; this
is the equivalent of 86 feet from grade. Both measurements are provided throughout this
report.]
Variance No. 95-32 is a request to permit an 86 foot high surge tower in lieu of 40 ft.
(exceeds maximum building height by 46 feet) pursuant to Section 9510.4 of the LCP. The
applicant has indicated that the variance request is necessary in order to accommodate
projected flows. According to studies done for the applicant, the maximum water surface
level could reach 96 feet (MSL). Because this is higher than existing Surge Tower No. 2
(76.5 feet grade; 88 feet MSL), it was recommended that the new Surge Tower No. 1 be built
98 feet high (MSL).
B. APPEAL:
On April 19, 1996 the CSDOC appealed the Planning Commission's action. Specifically, the
appeal focuses on Conditions of Approval Nos. 2 and 3 which address landscaping of the
site and the participation of the City in a strategic plan for the treatment plant. The appeal
letter states that the conditions are unreasonable. The CSDOC also suggests alternative
language for a condition that speaks to landscaping concerns. (Attachment No. 3)
C. BACKGROUND:
On January 10, 1996, the Zoning Administrator approved the subject coastal development
permit and variance request with conditions of approval finding that the project was
necessary for the public welfare. The project was appealed by Councilmember Harman on
January 18, 1996. His appeal letter noted that there will be negative visual impacts from
Pacific Coast Highway. On January 23, 1996, the applicant also appealed the project
because of two conditions of approval pertaining to water issues. The water issues included
the purchase of reclaimed water used to irrigate landscaping (Condition of Approval No. 7g,
as approved by the Zoning Administrator) and the number of pipes that will be installed
(Condition of Approval No. 7c); both were conditions of approval from the Department of
Public Works. Staff worked with the CSDOC to resolve all of the appeal issues. Prior to the
April 9, 1996 Planning Commission meeting, the applicant's appeal concerns were resolved
and there was apparent agreement on the conditions of approval that addressed
landscaping concerns.
D. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION:
The proposed surge tower at Treatment Plant No. 2 is clearly visible from many vantage
points along Pacific Coast Highway, from the bridge that crosses into Newport Beach
northwest to Brookhurst Street. Views of the site from Pacific Coast Highway were the
subject of the initial appeal to the Planning Commission by Councilmember Harman and
were the primary concern at the April 9, 1996 Planning Commission meeting. Consequently,
CD96-28.DOC -4- 05/08/96 11:43 AM
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: May 20, 1996 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD 96-28
additional conditions of approval were adopted by the Planning Commission that specifically
addressed views from Pacific Coast Highway.
While the- CSDOC concurs with the City that aesthetics of the site is very important, they
have indicated through their appeal to the City Council that their existing plans are
adequate. The CSDOC has proposed landscaping improvements that will be completed in
conjunction with the surge tower project (Attachment No. 7). These improvements are
designated for the southeast corner of the site and extend along the Santa Ana River.
Construction of the surge tower will take approximately 18 months; thus, it is likely that this
landscaping will be installed within the next two years. Additionally, the CSDOC will begin a
strategic plan this year which will include a detailed evaluation and plan for landscaping for
the entire site. This will update the CSDOC's Landscape Master Plan (Attachment No. 6)
and be completed in early 1998. The CSDOC believes that the implementation of these two
elements will adequately address aesthetic concerns about the site. They believe the
conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission are excessive and may delay
timely construction of the surge tower.
Staff has reviewed the landscape plans (Attachment No. 7) and believes that they could be
augmented. In addition, the requirement that additional landscaping be installed on the site
in areas that are visible from Pacific Coast Highway is not unreasonable given the size of
the proposed surge tower. The CSDOC has indicated that they would be willing to consider
landscaping modifications and additional requirements provided that such changes are
sensitive to their operating constraints, including budgeting and project timetables. Thus,
staff is recommending a revised condition of approval which balances the City's and the
CSDOC's concerns. The suggested conditions reflect the essence of the Planning
Commission's approval but provide for a phased approach .which the CSDOC believes is
attainable.
Specifically, staff recommends that the City Council approve the project with a revised
Condition of Approval No. 2. This condition would replace Conditions of Approval Nos. 2
and 3 approved by the Planning Commission. The recommended Condition No. 2 includes
three phases, each identifying a specific project or level of improvement to be completed by
the CSDOC. Phase 1 targets landscaping improvements to be completed in conjunction
with the surge tower and pump station projects. It is the same as Condition No. 2 approved
by the Planning Commission with one exception. The Planning Commission required that
CSDOC provide landscaping plans for the portion of the site that faces Pacific Coast
Highway prior to commencing construction of the surge tower project. The revised Condition
No. 2 requires a plan to be submitted for this task, with actual completion of the plan being
prepared in Phase 2. The improvements identified in Phase 2 would be implemented in
early 1998. Phase 3 of the revised condition of approval is essentially the same as
Condition No. 3 approved by the Planning Commission. It provides for City participation in
the CSDOC strategic plan effort.
CD96-28.DOC -5- 05/08/96 11:43 AM
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: May 20, 1996 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD 96-28
E. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING SUMMARY:
During the April 9, 1996 Planning Commission meeting one resident spoke regarding
concerns about landscaping and views from Pacific Coast Highway. Dave Ludwin,
representing the CSDOC, also spoke about the proposed project and the CSDOC's
landscaping plans.
F. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission moved to have additional landscaping plans prepared which
would show landscaping improvements along the frontage of the site facing Pacific Coast
Highway and asked that the plans be brought back to them for review and approval. They
approved the project with revised conditions of approval.
G. SUMMARY
The replacement of the existing pump station and surge tower with larger structures will
result in potential impacts to views from Brookhurst Street and Pacific Coast Highway. The
CSDOC has identified several aesthetic related improvements that they believe will alleviate
concerns about the appearance of the site. Staff recommends that the City Council approve
Coastal Development Permit No. 95-39 and Variance No. 95-32 with revised conditions of
approval based on the following considerations:
• The pump station and surge tower have been designed to meet projected demand.
These two components are integral to the operations of the wastewater treatment
plant which provides a service that is essential for the health and safety of Huntington
Beach residents and businesses.
• The landscaping plans and strategic plan effort planned by the CSDOC will result in
an improved appearance of the treatment plant when viewed from Pacific Coast
Highway and other public rights of way.
Environmental Status:
The proposed project was previously reviewed and approved in the Joint Treatment Works
Wastewater Master Plan Environmental Impact Report (State Clearing House No.
88012008) certified by the Board of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
in June 1989. This environmental document evaluated the proposed Surge Tower No. 1
with a height of 88 feet (MSL). When studies of the tower showed it would be necessary to
raise the height of the tower 10 feet, the CSDOC prepared a supplement to the previous
environmental impact report. The supplement, Supplement No. 3 to Final Program
Environmental Impact Report for Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities for County
Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, (State Clearing House No. 94071060) was
approved by the Board of Supervisors in January 1995.
CD96-28.DOC -6- 05/08/96 11:43 AM
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: May 20, 1996 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD 96-28
Attachment(s):
City Clerk's
Page Number
1. Findings and Conditions of Approval for Coastal Development Permit
No. 95-39/Variance No. 95-32 (Planning Commission
Recommendation)
2. Findings and Conditions of Approval for Coastal Development Permit
No. 95-39/Variance No. 95-32 (Staff Recommendation)
3. Letter of Appeal from the County Sanitation Districts of Orange
County, dated April 19, 1996
4. Planning Commission Staff Report dated April 9, 1996
5. Site Plan, Floor Plans and Elevations dated November 13, 1995 and
December 19, 1995.
6. Landscape Master Plan dated 1986
7. Detailed Landscape Plans dated February 15, 1996
8. Letter in opposition (received after the April 9, 1996 Planning
Commission meeting)
CD96-28.DOC -7- 05/08/96 11:43 AM
A. Planning Commission Recommendation:
Motion to:
-1: ApprGve-Negattve--Declaret Gn--A"S-1a-iith Mitigation-Measures-as
lase--Permit-Na:9544-wit#,Special Permits-and-CGesMi-Development
ors-Attach t-No:2-o the-RCA-dated-512.0/96-
QR-
B. Planning Staff Recommendation:
Motion to:
1. Approve Negative Declaration No. 95-11 with Mitigation Measures as set
forth on Attachment No. 10 of the RCA dated 5/20/96,
And,
2. Overturn the Planning Commission's action by approving Conditional Use
Permit No. 95-84 with one (1) Special Permit and Coastal Development
Permit No. 95-25 with modifications, findings, and suggested conditions of
approval as set forth on Attachment No. 3 of the RCA dated 5/20/96.
[(1) As amended by language change (a.) waiver of 4.5 foot alley
dedication) to be a Finding of Approval rather than denial
(2) Add finding that a finding is also included that it is a blind
alley with no through traffic -- 5-1 -- Green - NO
Conditions of approval to be amended by staff to accommodate
City Council's motion on appeal-- 5-1 -- Garofalo - NO]
i
(5) 5/20/96 - Council/Agency Agenda - Page 5
Recommended Action:
A: P,GGmmissiGn Re
Agetien-te:
VphGid the Xanning CGmmissien!sac ie-an A-.-. ave GGasM Devel-----*,
PeFmit-AFa-95-39N,ariane"G.-9A-32-with-€mdkigs-and-so"tiGns-eiappFoval
OR
B. Staff Recommendation:
Motion to:
Approve Coastal Development Permit No. 95-39 and Variance No. 95-32
with findings and revised conditions of approval as set forth on
Attachment No. 2 to the RCA dated 5/20/66.
[Approved 6-0 as amended to change wording on Attachment 2.3
to read "(iii) Implementation of a study of landscaping
possibilities along the PCH side of the facility" also - that the
Council representatives to the Sanitation Board be notified of any
meetings of substance AND further for plan to return to Council
within 45 - days.]
PHONE CALL
FOR DATE kIME �f P.M.
M L l/L C-t--
OF TELEPHONED
RETURNED
PHONE YQIJR CALL
AREA CODE- NUMBER - EXTENSION - PLEASE CALL
FAX#
G� ^�K �� ALL C LL
ME SAGE '`-�-� G
�lLyLl►' ` RAME
TO SEE YOU
WANTS
TO SEE YOU
IGIT
(5) 5/20/96 - Council/Agency Agenda - Page 5
D-2. (City Council Appeal Filed By County Sanitation Districts of Orange County -
To Planning Commission's Conditional Approval of Coastal Development
Permit No. 95-39/Variance No. 95-32 (3.200 s.q. Pump Station &
Reconstruction of an Existing Hydraulic Surge Tower) (420.80)
Communication from the Community Development Director.
Communication from John Ely dated 5/15/96 included.
Applicant/Appellant: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Request: An appeal of the Planning Commission's approval of Coastal
Development Permit No. 95-39 and Variance No. 95-32 for a new 3,200 square
foot pump station and the reconstruction of an existing hydraulic surge tower.
The approval included a variance for an 86 foot high tower in lieu of maximum
40 foot height permitted by the code. The County Sanitation Districts of Orange
County is appealing two (2) conditions of approval regarding landscaping of the
site and City participation in a facilities master plan for the treatment plant.
Location: 22212 Brookhurst (approximately 2,200 feet north of Pacific Coast
Highway, adjacent to the Santa Ana River)
Coastal Status: Located in the appealable jurisdiction of the Coastal Zone and
includes Coastal Development Permit No. 95-39, filed on November 13, 1995, in
conjunction with the above request and notice is hereby given that this Coastal
Development Permit hearing consists of a staff report, public hearing, City
Council discussion and action. May be appealed to the Coastal Commission,
245 W. Broadway, Suite 380, Long Beach, CA 90801-1450, following City
Council action or unless Title 14, Section 13573 of the California Administrative
Code is applicable.
Environmental Status: Covered by Environmental Impact Report State Clearing
House No. 88012008 certified by the Board of Directors County Sanitation
Districts of Orange County in June, 1989 and Supplement No. 3 to the
Environmental Impact Report certified by the Board of Directors County
Sanitation Districts of Orange County in January, 1995.
Recommended Action:
A. Planning Commission Recommendation:
Motion to:
Uphold the Planning Commission's action and approve Coastal
Development Permit No. 95-39/Variance No. 95-32 with findings and
conditions of approval as set forth on Attachment No. 1 of the RCA dated
5/20/96.
OR
B. Staff Recommendation:
Motion to:
Approve Coastal Development Permit No. 95-39 and Variance No. 95-32
with findings and revised conditions of approval as set forth on
0 Attachment No. 2 to the RCA dated 5/20/96.
(5)
Page 6- Council/Agency Agenda - 5/20/96 (6)
D-3. (City Council) Appeal Filed By Mayor Dave Sullivan To Planning
Commission's Approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 95-84 with Special
Permits/Coastal Development Permit No. 95-25- Negative Declaration
No. 95-11 - (Standard Market - 126 Main Street) (420.40)
Communication from the Community Development Director.
Public hearing to consider the following:
Applicant: Richard A. Harlow
Appellant: Mayor Dave Sullivan
Request: To construct a 9,475 square foot, two-story commercial building with
special permits for waivers from alley dedication, rear yard setback, and build-to
line on Main Street and on Walnut Avenue; and participation in the in-lieu
parking fee program.
Location: 126 Main Street (southeast corner of Main Street and Walnut Avenue)
Coastal Status: Located in the non-appealable jurisdiction of the Coastal Zone
and includes Coastal Development Permit No. 95-25 filed on 9/18/95 in
conjunction with above request.
Environmental Status: The Council will also consider Negative Declaration
No. 95-11. Notice is hereby given that initial environmental assessments for the
above item was processed and completed in accordance with the California
Quality Act. It was determined that this item, with mitigation, would not have any
significant environmental effects and that a mitigated negative declaration is
warranted. Prior to acting on the appeal, the City Council must review and act
on the negative declaration. These environmental assessments are on file at
the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department, 2000 Main
Street, and are available for public inspection and comment by contacting the
Community Development Department.
(Continued on next Page)
(6)
A.......
T......
TIC �.......%..................... ......%.........%.........%.%......
NT 1' .-....-..-...
FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 95-39/
VARIANCE NO. 95-32
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL- COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 95-39:
1. The request to permit a 3,200 square foot pump station and an 86 foot high surge tower
conforms with the plans, policies, requirements and standards of the Coastal Element of the
General Plan. The proposed landscaping and mural improvements will improve the
appearance of the treatment facility, and completion of the project will promote the Coastal
Element goal of providing adequate community facilities within the Coastal Zone. The surge
tower will be located at a facility which already includes several other towers and structures
which, because of their size, height and stark appearance, may be considered to impact views.
The proposed tower will not significantly add to these impacts but because of its height will be
visible from Pacific Coast Highway. The proposed landscaping improvements are designed to
minimize impacts of the proposed tower and existing structures. Further, the tower will be
located at the southeasterly end of the site and will not be visible from the residences on the
west side of Brookhurst Avenue. The proposed pump station and surge tower will not impact
public access because they are in an area where none exists.
2. Coastal Development Permit No. 95-39 is consistent with the CZ suffix zoning requirements,
the MI-A Zoning District, as well as other provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance
Code applicable to the property. The proposed development will conform with all applicable
City codes. The proposed pump station and surge tower involve the reconstruction and
relocation of existing facilities located within the County Sanitation Districts of Orange
County Wastewater Treatment Plant No. 2. The pump station will conform to all applicable
City codes. The surge tower will conform to all City codes with the exception of the
maximum height limit of 40 feet. The overall 86 foot height of the proposed surge tower has
been approved through the granting of Variance Number 95-32 which has been processed
concurrently with the Coastal Development Permit.
3. At the time of commencement of operations, the proposed pump station and surge tower will
be provided with infrastructure in a manner that is consistent with the Coastal Element of the
General Plan. Infrastructure currently exists to the site. Any modifications to infrastructure
required as a result of development of this project have been included as conditions of
approval.
4. The proposed pump station and surge tower conform with the public access and public
recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. No public access or
recreational opportunities will be affected by the new construction.
(Attachment No. 1-1)
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL- VARIANCE NO. 95-32:
1. The granting of a variance for an 86 foot high surge tower ( 98 feet MSL) in lieu of maximum
40 foot height will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon
other properties in the vicinity and under an identical zone classification. The proposed surge
tower will be part of the facilities at the existing County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Wastewater Treatment Plant 2. This land use is necessary for the health and safety of the
residents and businesses of Huntington Beach. The height of the surge tower is necessary to
accommodate the increased wastewater treatment capacity necessitated by current and
projected population increases. Any land use in an identical zoning classification which
provided a service that was critical for the health and safety of City residents and businesses
could be anticipated to be granted a similar variance that was deemed necessary for health and
safety reasons.
2. Because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape,
topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of the zoning ordinance is found
to deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and
under identical zone classification. Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would deprive
the property of its ability to operate the Treatment Plant at its optimum capacity and
accommodate future demand. Other industrial uses in the MI-A zoning classification can
operate optimally because their successful operation is not determined solely by their ability to
directly accommodate population increases.
3. The granting of a variance is necessary to preserve the enjoyment of one or more substantial
property rights. In order for the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County to meet the
wastewater treatment needs of the regional population, it must have the capacity to function
at a level which meets these needs. As the population grows, the waste treatment capacity
must also increase. The height of the surge tower is determined by the capacity of the
treatment plant. Granting a variance from the height restrictions will enable the Treatment
Plant to continue to provide the service it was granted approval to provide at this specific site.
4. The granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious to property in the same zone classification and is consistent with the General Plan.
The granting of a variance will enhance the public welfare because it ensures that the County
Sanitation Districts of Orange County can provide adequate wastewater treatment service
which is necessary for the health and safety of the residents and businesses of Huntington
Beach.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 95-39/
VARIANCE NO. 95-32:
1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated November 13, 1995 for the surge
tower and December 12, 1995 for the pump station shall be the conceptually approved layout.
(Attachment No. 1-2)
2. The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County shall work with the Department of Public
Works to augment and modify the landscape plans dated February 15, 1996. The Department
of Public Works shall submit suggested modifications to Drawings No. L 101 and L 102 within
30 days of this approval. The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County and the City of
Huntington Beach shall work cooperatively in an effort to improve the visual appearance of
the plant as viewed from Pacific Coast Highway. The revised landscape plans shall be
submitted to the Planning Commission for final review and approval (non-public hearing item)
prior to commencing construction of the pump station and surge tower. The landscape plans
shall also include the following:
a. Additional landscaping between the proposed pump station and the blockwall along
Brookhurst Street. The plant material shall be of sufficient height at maturity to
effectively screen the portion of the proposed pump station that will extend above the
existing blockwall and shall be installed within the one month of completion of the pump
station.
b. Additional landscaping along the Pacific Coast Highway side of the facility shall be
provided and shall include vines on the wall and trees, such as eucalyptus, which will
effectively shield views from Pacific Coast Highway.
c. A phasing plan identifying timing for landscape improvements to be completed over the
next two years in conjunction with construction of the surge tower and pump station.
(PW)
3. The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County shall include an urban design element in the
Phase II strategic plan. The strategic plan shall be prepared by the applicant with active
participation from the City of Huntington Beach Public Works staff to develop a mutually
acceptable urban design element of a strategic plan. The urban design element shall address,
but not be limited to, the following items:
a. Landscaping
b. Murals
c. Interim Land Uses
d. Facility Siting
e. Community Education
f. Architectural Features
4. Prior to construction, the applicant shall comply with the following:
a. A flood-proofing certificate shall be provided to the Planning Division.
b. Submit drawings for the proposed water system improvements to the Water Division for
review and approval. All water system improvements shall be designed and installed per
the City of Huntington Beach Water Division's Standard Plans, Specifications and Design
Criteria. (PW)
5. The use shall comply with the following:
a. Insure that the water system is capable of meeting the required fire flow of 2500 GPM.
(FD)
(Attachment No. 1-3)
b. The proposed water system improvements shall conform to the State Department of
Health Services California Code of Regulations, Title 17, including Section 7603 titled
"Location of Backflow Preventers, subsection(a); "Air-gap Separation." The water
service lateral between the property line and the air-gap tank shall be located a minimum
of six (6) inches above ground and painted medium blue, Dunn-Edwards No. 10-1-
VF51652, with white stenciling. The stenciling shall appear on both sides of the pipe with
the marking"City Potable Water" in one-inch letters repeated every 24 inches. (PW)
c. If the meters are not to be located in the public right-of-way, the applicant shall be
responsible for the preparation and execution of all utility easements/agreements required
by the City granting the City the same rights and privileges as if the meters were located in
the public right-of-way. These rights and privileges shall include (but are not limited to)
24 hour access, maintenance and testing. The City shall be responsible for the ownership
and maintenance of the water facilities/appurtenances between the mainline and up to and
including the meter assembly. (PW)
d. The water system design shall include appropriate water hammer protection, consistent
with documented civil engineering industry practices, and acceptable to the Water
Division. (PW)
e. The project shall be served by a minimum of one (1) water service connection from the
sixteen inch water main in Brookhurst Street. The service connection shall not be joined
together on the "public" side of the meter. (PW)
f. All existing water services shall be abandoned at the water main per City of Huntington
Beach Water Division's Standard Plans and Specifications prior to the City's final
acceptance of the proposed water system improvements. This includes any irrigation
services currently serving the site. (PW)
g. The landscape areas shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner.
h. Note on plans: Fire extinguishers shall be provided and located in areas to comply with
the Huntington Beach Fire Code Standards.
6. The Planning Commission.shall be notified in writing if any changes in structure height, floor
area, setbacks, building elevations or open space are proposed as a result of the plan check
process. The Planning Commission reserves the right to require that an amendment to the
original entitlement be processed if the proposed changes are of a substantial nature.
7. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable
material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them.
INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REOUI REMENTS:
1. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State, and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and
standards.
2. The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality
Management District.
(Attachment No. 1-4)
3. The applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit for work done in the public right-of-way.
4. Landscaping shall comply with Section 9607 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code.
5. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Coastal Development Permit No. 95-
39 /Variance No. 95-32 if any violation of these conditions of the Huntington Beach
Ordinance Code occurs.
6. Coastal Development Permit No. 95-39/Variance No. 95-32 shall become null and void
unless exercised within one year of,the date of final approval or such extension of time as
may be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Department of
Community Development a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date.
(Attachment No. 1-5)
.............................
.. ......
.....................
"ATT - . MENT�: ...........................
FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 95-39/
VARIANCE NO. 95-32
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL- COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 95-39:
1. The-request to permit a 3,200 square foot pump station and an 86 foot high surge tower
conforms with the plans, policies, requirements and standards of the Coastal Element of the
General Plan. The proposed landscaping and mural improvements will improve the
appearance of the treatment facility, and completion of the project will promote the Coastal
Element goal of providing adequate community facilities within the Coastal Zone. The surge
tower will be located at a facility which already includes several other towers and structures
which, because of their size, height and stark appearance, may be considered to impact views.
The proposed tower will not significantly add to these impacts but because of its height will be
visible from Pacific Coast Highway. The proposed landscaping improvements are designed to
minimize impacts of the proposed tower and existing structures. Further, the tower will be
located at the southeasterly end of the site and will not be visible from the residences on the
west side of Brookhurst Avenue. The proposed pump station and surge tower will not impact
public access because they are in an area where none exists.
2. Coastal Development Permit No. 95-39 is consistent with the CZ suffix zoning requirements,
the MI-A Zoning District, as well as other provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance
Code applicable to the property. The proposed development will conform with all applicable
City codes. The proposed pump station and surge tower involve the reconstruction and
relocation of existing facilities located within the County Sanitation Districts of Orange
County Wastewater Treatment Plant No. 2. The pump station will conform to all applicable
City codes. The surge tower will conform to all City codes with the exception of the
maximum height limit of 40 feet. The overall 86 foot height of the proposed surge tower has
been approved through the granting of Variance Number 95-32 which has been processed
concurrently with the Coastal Development Permit..
3. At the time of commencement of operations, the proposed pump station and surge tower will
be provided with infrastructure in a manner that is consistent with the Coastal Element of the
General Plan. Infrastructure currently exists to the site. Any modifications to infrastructure
required as a result of development of this project have been included as conditions of
approval.
4. The proposed pump station and surge tower conform with the public access and public
recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. No public access or
recreational opportunities will be affected by the new construction.
(Attachment No. 2-1)
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL- VARIANCE NO. 95-32:
1. The granting of a variance for an 86 foot high surge tower(98 feet MSL) in lieu of maximum
40 foot height will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon
other properties in the vicinity and under an identical zone classification. The proposed surge
tower will be part of the facilities at the existing County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Wastewater Treatment Plant 2. This land use is necessary for the health and safety of the
residents and businesses of Huntington Beach. The height of the surge tower is necessary to
accommodate the increased wastewater treatment capacity necessitated by current and
projected population increases. Any land use in an identical zoning classification which
provided a service that was critical for the health and safety of City residents and businesses
could be anticipated to be granted a similar variance that was deemed necessary for health and
safety reasons.
2. Because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape,
topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of the zoning ordinance is found
to deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and
under identical zone classification. Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would deprive
the property of its ability to operate the Treatment Plant at its optimum capacity and
accommodate future demand. Other industrial uses in the MI-A zoning classification can
operate optimally because their successful operation is not determined solely by their ability to
directly accommodate population increases.
3. The granting of a variance is necessary to preserve the enjoyment of one or more substantial
property rights. In order for the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County to meet the
wastewater treatment needs of the regional population, it must have the capacity to function
at a level which meets these needs. As the population grows, the waste treatment capacity
must also increase. The height of the surge tower is determined by the capacity of the
treatment plant. Granting a variance from the height restrictions will enable the Treatment
Plant to continue to provide the service it was granted approval to provide at this specific site.
4. The granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious to property in the same zone classification and is consistent with the General Plan.
The granting of a variance will enhance the public welfare because it ensures that the County
Sanitation Districts of Orange County can provide adequate wastewater treatment service
which is necessary for the health and safety of the residents and businesses of Huntington
Beach.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 95-39/
VARIANCE NO. 95-32:
1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated November 13, 1995 for the surge
tower and December 12, 1995 for the pump station shall be the conceptually approved layout.
2. The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County and the City of Huntington Beach shall
work cooperatively in an effort to improve the visual appearance of the plant as viewed from
Pacific Coast Highway. The improvements shall be implemented in three phases as follows:
(Attachment No. 2-2)
Phase 1 The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County shall work with the
Department of Public Works to augment and modify the landscape plans dated
February 15, 1996 to include the items below. The revised landscape plans shall
be submitted to the Planning Commission for final review and approval (non-
public hearing item) prior to commencing construction of the pump station and
surge tower.
i. The Department of Public Works shall submit suggested modifications to
Drawings No. L101 and L102 within 30 days of this approval. The landscaping
improvements identified on the plans dated February 15, 1996, as revised, shall
be installed by the completion of the hydraulic surge tower project.
ii. Additional landscaping between the proposed pump station and the blockwall
along Brookhurst Street. The plant material shall be of sufficient height at
maturity to effectively screen the portion of the proposed pump station that will
extend above the existing blockwall and shall be installed within the one month
of completion of the pump station.
iii. Submittal of a plan to do a study of landcaping possiblities along the Pacific
Coast Highway side of the facility
Phase 2 The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County shall prepare a plan,
pursuant to item iii of Phase 1, that provides for additional landscaping along
the Pacific Coast Highway side of the facility. The plan shall provide for
landscaping improvements that shield views of Treatment Plant No. 2 from
Pacific Coast Highway as effectively as possible, given restrictions imposed by
the Department of Fish and Game and constraints resulting from the Plant's
infrastructure both above and below ground.
The plan shall be completed at the conclusion of the County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County's strategic plan process or June of 1998, which ever occurs
sooner. Implementation of the plan shall commence immediately thereafter.
Phase 3 The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County shall include an urban design
element in the Phase II strategic plan. The strategic plan shall be prepared by
the applicant with active participation from the City of Huntington Beach Public
Works staff to develop an urban design element which addresses landscaping
and aesthetics of Treatment Plant No. 2.
3. Prior to construction, the applicant shall comply with the following:
a. A flood-proofing certificate shall be provided to the Planning Division.
b. Submit drawings for the proposed water system improvements to the Water Division for
review and approval. All water system improvements shall be designed and installed per
the City of Huntington Beach Water Division's Standard Plans, Specifications and Design
Criteria. (PW)
(Attachment No. 2-3)
4. The use shall comply with the following:
a. Insure that the water system is capable of meeting the required fire flow of 2500 GPM.
(FD)
b. The proposed water system improvements shall conform to the State Department of
Health Services California Code of Regulations, Title 17, including Section 7603 titled
"Location of Backflow Preventers, subsection(a); "Air-gap Separation." The water
service lateral between the property line and the air-gap tank shall be located a minimum
of six (6) inches above ground and painted medium blue, Dunn-Edwards No. 10-1-
VF51652, with white stenciling. The stenciling shall appear on both sides of the pipe with
the marking"City Potable Water" in one-inch letters repeated every 24 inches. (PW)
c. If the meters are not to be located in the public right-of-way, the applicant shall be
responsible for the preparation and execution of all utility easements/agreements required
by the City granting the City the same rights and privileges as if the meters were located in
the public right-of-way. These rights and privileges shall include (but are not limited to)
24 hour access, maintenance and testing. The City shall be responsible for the ownership
and maintenance of the water facilities/appurtenances between the mainline and up to and
including the meter assembly. (PW)
d. The water system design shall include appropriate water hammer protection, consistent
with documented civil engineering industry practices, and acceptable to the Water
Division. (PW)
e. The project shall be served by a minimum of one (1) water service connection from the
sixteen inch water main in Brookhurst Street. The service connection shall not be joined
together on the"public" side of the meter. (PW)
f. All existing water services shall be abandoned at the water main per City of Huntington
Beach Water Division's Standard Plans and Specifications prior to the City's final
acceptance of the proposed water system improvements. This includes any irrigation
services currently serving the site. (PW)
g. The landscape areas shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner.
h. Note on plans: Fire extinguishers shall be provided and located in areas to comply with
the Huntington Beach Fire Code Standards.
5. The Planning Commission shall be notified in writing if any changes in structure height, floor
area, setbacks, building elevations or open space are proposed as a result of the plan check
process. The Planning Commission reserves the right to require that an amendment to the
original entitlement be processed if the proposed changes are of a substantial nature.
6. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable _
material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them.
(Attachment No. 2-4)
INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REOUIREMENTS:
1. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State, and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and
standards.
2. The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality
Management District.
3. The applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit for work done in the public right-of-way.
4. Landscaping shall comply with Section 9607 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code.
5. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Coastal Development Permit No. 95-
39/Variance No. 95-32 if any violation of these conditions of the Huntington Beach
Ordinance Code occurs.
6. Coastal Development Permit No. 95-39/Variance No. 95-32 shall become null and void
unless exercised within one year of the date of final approval or such extension of time as
may be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Department of
Community Development a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date.
(Attachment No. 2-5)
I�1VT- °: : 3
P CN p\STR I CTS
y COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
r
HEEN�\PAN� April 19, 1996 - t
Mayor Dave Sullivan
and Members of City Council ,
Phone: of Huntington Beach = ,
(714)962 2411 City of Huntington Beach '`='
c/o City Clerk
mailing address:
P.O. Box 8127 2000 Main Street --,
Fountain valley, CA Post Office Box 180
92728-8127 Huntington Beach, CA. 92648
"7
street address:
10844 Ellis Avenue Subject: Appeal of Planning Commission Conditional Approval of Count Sanitation
Fountain valley, CA 1 PP 9 PP Y
92708-7018 Districts of Orange County Coastal Permit No. 95-39/Variance No. 95-32 for
Rebuilding of Ocean Outfall Surge Tower No. I (CSDOC Job No. J-34-1)
Dear Mayor and Members of City Council:
Member
Agencies This letter is County of Sanitation Districts of Orange County ("Districts") formal appeal
0 of the City of Huntington Beach Planning Commission's action conditionally to approve
Cities under Coastal Permit No. 95-39/Variance No. 95-32, the Districts' proposal to construct
Anaheim the following: 1) an 86-foot surge tower, and 2) a 3,200 square foot pump station on
Brea Districts' property.
Buena Park
Cypress More specifically, the Districts appeal Conditions 2 and 3 as both unreasonable and
Fountain Valley
Fullerton unlawful, and further request the City Council to replace these conditions with the
Huntington Beach proposed condition recommended by the Districts as outlined below.
Irvine
La Habra
La Palma I. Procedural Background.
Los Alamitos
Newport Beach
Orange The Districts applied for a coastal permit for its project in November 1995 to the
Placentia Cityof Huntington Beach. The Districts that time, a reed to submit to the jurisdiction
Santa Ana g eac s a g
Seal Beach of the City only on the basis that the City act as agent to the Coastal Commission for
Stanton purposes of reviewing the Districts construction proposal within the coastal zone. The
Tustin
Villa Park Districts do not agree that the City, acting in its normal zoning capacity has legal
Yorba Linda jurisdiction over the Districts.
County of Orange
In January 1996, the City of Huntington Beach Zoning Administrator approved
Sanitary Districts Coastal Development Permit No. 95-39 and Variance No. 95-32. That approval did not
contain any special landscaping requirements, or other design element requirements,
Costa Mesa relating to land and facilities not directly related to the Districts' proposed construction of
Garden Grove
Midway City the surge tower or pump station.
Water Districts The Districts do propose landscape screening elements with respect to the
Irvine Ranch proposed construction. The City, under the Zoning Administrator's approval, requires
approval of those plans. The Districts agree with this approach.
However, the Zoning Administrator's approval was then promptly appealed by
Councilman Tom Harman because of"...negative visual impact of the facilities when
viewed from Pacific Coast Highway." During the Planning Commission hearing, City
A Public Wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Committed to Protecting the Environment Since 1954
„STRICTS 0
ti�\OR Hq
U yM
Q ' C
0
Z
• THEENVP�NSE�• Mayor Dave Sullivan
Members of City Council
Page 2
April 19, 1996
staff basically supported the Districts' position which is as follows: 1) the Districts have
included landscaping measures to mitigate any aesthetic impacts from the pump station
and surge tower construction, and 2) the broader issues of landscaping and aesthetics
relating to other parts of the Districts' facilities should not be tied to these subject
permits.
Councilman Harman, as the appellant, did not provide any further written or oral
evidence to articulate his appeal at the Planning Commission hearing.
Notwithstanding the City's staff position and the Districts' concerns, the Planning
Commission voted to impose two new conditions which Districts' staff just recently
obtained. These conditions are Items 2 and 3, which go far beyond landscaping
requirements needed to address the surge tower and pump station. They impose
requirements relating to landscaping affecting all of Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) along
the Districts' property, as well as all aesthetic requirements for other parts of the
Districts' property.
II. Specific Grounds of Appeal.
A. Conditions 2 and 3 Lack a Required Legal "Nexus”with Respect to the
Surge Tower and Pump Station Construction.
Districts contend that Conditions 2 and 3 are unreasonable and lack the required
nexus between the purpose of the conditions and the actual impact of the proposed
construction.
First, the Districts have proposed a landscape plan which buffers the surge tower
construction, commencing from its site to the Southeast corner of Districts' property and
then approximately 500 feet in a westerly direction along the PCH side of the plant.
Conditions 2 and 3, however, require landscaping all along PCH (a 1/2 mile distance)
which obviously has nothing to do with screening and mitigating visual impacts arising
from the surge tower construction.
In short, the purpose of Conditions 2 and 3, i.e., mitigating visual impacts from
plant property along PCH, has absolutely no connection to the problem of visual impacts
arising from the surge tower construction. Therefore, Conditions 2 and 3 have no nexus
to the Districts' project construction.
B. Conditions 2 and 3 Are Zoning Requirements Unrelated to the Limited Role of
the City Acting in its Capacity of Agent to the Coastal Commission.
Conditions 2 and 3 attempt to impose zoning aesthetic requirements with respect
to Districts' property, unrelated to the proposed construction, which are beyond the
powers of this Coastal Permit process.
The Districts have, in good faith, submitted an application under the coastal
aN"ST RIFTS 0
♦ q4
• y o
i
Mayor Dave Sullivan
"NGT„ ENN Members of City Council
Page 3
April 19, 1996
permit provisions of state law. The City, in our view and understanding, is acting as an
.agent of the State Commission for purposes of reviewing this specific construction
,because it is within the Coastal Commission's jurisdiction. However, this coastal permit
process should not be used as a "trigger" for going beyond the need to mitigate
aesthetic impacts directly from this construction to other zoning concerns on other parts
of Districts' property. The Districts have historically contended that cities do not have the
legal authority to extend its zoning police powers to the Districts over zoning matters
such as these.
C. Conditions 2 and 3 are not Reasonable Because They Fail to Recognize that
Other Regulatory Agencies are Involved in Landscape Issues along PCH.
The installation of landscaping along PCH on Districts' property requires the
close review by the State Department of Fish and Game and the Huntington Beach
Coastal Conservancy. State approval is needed because of Fish and Game issues; the
Conservancy is involved because part of this subject area is controlled by the
Conservancy under an "open space" easement granted to it some years ago. Thus,
planning for future landscaping in this area is involved and extensive. The Districts'
surge tower project would be substantially delayed if approval by these other agencies is
sought.
D. Recommended Condition.
The Districts recommend that the following Condition replace Conditions 2 and 3:
New Condition 2. "The Department of Public Works shall review and approve
Districts' landscape plans for this project within 30 days of this
approval."
The Districts have submitted landscape plans which they believe address the aesthetic
impacts from the proposed construction. Indeed, City staff have never objected to, nor
requested, modifications of these plans. The Districts will cooperate fully with this review
process and adhere to any reasonable modifications proposed by the City.
E. Protest Regarding Filing of$1200 Fee for this Appeal.
The Districts protest having to pay a $1,200 filing fee for this appeal. The fee was
paid to secure the timely filing of the appeal. Historically, the Districts have not required
filing of such fees from other public entities, such as cities and; therefore respectfully
request that the City refund this filing fee.
F. Conclusions.
The Districts sincerely wish to work with the City of Huntington Beach regarding
aesthetic issues concerning Districts' property. The Districts agree that landscaping is
important. Presently, the Districts are developing an "urban design element" as part of
toNM TRACTS
•!.? yCF
5 O
Z
Mayor Dave Sullivan
�CTNG THE EN� Members of City Council
Page 4
April 19, 1996
our new Strategic Plan, to address major landscape and aesthetic issues on plant
.including the PCH location. The Districts are committed to bring the City into that
:planning process.
In conclusion, the Districts request that the City Council vote to approve the coastal
permit and allow this project to go forward in a timely way without using this permit to
require landscape conditions and other related matters not associated directly with this
project.
Your areful att tion an onsideration to this important matter is most appreciated.
David A. Ludwin, P.E.
Director of Engineering
TMD:sl
eng\tm ftlanning\041996.11
c: Victor Leipzig, Councilman/Director
Ralph Bauer, Councilman/Director
Shirley Detloff, Councilwoman/Director
r � :. .. NT 4 `'
;.: ..: ::. ;.:..:..:...:; .H rihn ton Beach D rt ii' n . f:. ni ..Deela meet u..:.....g..;.;.:..: :.: :. epa:.: e:a o,Gommu ty :::::::::::<::: ;.:.;::.;::..;:.;.;.:.::..::.;:... ..
:: : : : ::....:::::: ..: ...:::::.:. ....:.:.::.:..:......::... PORT.
,<
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Howard Zelefsky, Planning Direct
BY: Mary Beth Broeren, Associate Planner-
DATE: April 9, 1996
SUBJECT: COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 95-39NARIANCE NO. 95-32
(APPEAL) (SANITATION DISTRICT) (CONTINUED FROM MARCH 26, 1996)
LOCATION: 22212 Brookhurst St. (East of Brookhurst St., West of Santa Ana River and North of
Pacific Coast Highway)
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
Transmitted for Planning Commission consideration are two appeals of the coastal development permit and the
variance which were approved by the'Zoning Administrator on January 10, 1996. This item was continued from
the March 26, 1996 Planning Commission meeting to allow staff time to resolve conditions of approval. The
applications represent a request to construct two structures at Treatment Plant No. 2 operated by the County
Sanitation Districts of Orange County. One of the structures is an 86 foot high surge tower that will replace a
55.5 foot high tower and be located approximately 400 feet closer to Pacific Coast Highway. The applicant has
requested a variance for the surge tower because it exceeds the maximum 40 foot height permitted for the
property. The applicant has indicated that the new location is necessary because of the presence of seismic faults
at the location of the existing tower and that the variance request is necessary in order to accommodate projected
flows. The second structure is a 3,200 square foot pump station that will replace an existing 400 square foot
station. The new pump station is required because of projected demand for water flows.
The first appeal is by Tom Harman, City Councilmember, who expressed concerns about negative visual
impacts from Pacific Coast Highway. The second appeal was by the applicant because of two conditions of
approval pertaining to water issues. The applicant has agreed to include the City in a facility master plan effort
to begin late this summer. As part of that effort, landscaping and other aesthetic concerns will be evaluated.
Staff believes that this will adequately address the visual impact issues raised in the appeal. Regarding the two
conditions of approval appealed by the applicant, staff has achieved a resolution on one condition of approval
pertaining to the number of water connection pipes. The Public Works Department is working with the
applicant to resolve the other issue regarding the purchase of reclaimed water for landscaping and hopes to
provide additional information at the public hearing. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission uphold
the Zoning Administrator's approval of Coastal Development Permit No. 95-39 and Variance No. 95-32 based
on the following considerations:
• The pump station and surge tower have been designed to meet projected demand. These two components
are integral to the operations of the wastewater treatment plant which provides a service that is essential for
the health and safety of Huntington Beach residents and businesses.
• The facilities master plan effort will evaluate aesthetics of the site, including landscape and mural
alternatives, and will result in projects that will minimize negative visual impacts of the facilities.
.o
r �
BANNING AVE
♦ , LJ L
V R,,Q.. I .ovr a -.p, C.
r H
I III1
p L,Al" a. Iz
r, C. Lar:Y —
cnr:. o-
O
c
< I I
r• _ _ I
� J
� I O•
� I
C/F tee. �� • SLU E I ti
/C BEDS =
LL �LJ I o
� u
Ivy 2
,J� 0P0 O
C. ORANGE COUNTY
SANITATION TREATMENT
PLANT
_ `ST
r
O•'.
Y 1
sv
C,- :o.
ef,C
SITE
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 95-39/
VARIANCE NO. 95-32
RECOMMENDATION:
Motion to:
"Uphold the Zoning Administrator's action and approve Coastal Development Permit No. 95-39/Variance
No. 95-32 with findings and revised conditions of approval.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
APPELLANT: Tom Harman, City Councilmember, and County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,
P.O. Box 8127, Fountain Valley, CA 92728
APPLICANT: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, P.O. Box 8127, Fountain Valley, CA
92728
PROPERTY
OWNER: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, P.O. Box 8127, Fountain Valley, CA
92728 .
REQUEST: To construct a new 3,200 square foot pump station and an 86 foot high surge tower. The
surge tower will replace an existing surge tower that will be demolished. The variance is
requested because the surge tower exceeds the permitted maximum height of 40 feet.
DATE
ACCEPTED: January 18, 1996
SUBJECT PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATIONS:
LOCATION GENERAL PLAN
...
ZONING: LAND USE
._ .: .
Subject Property: Other Uses: Public, M1-A-CZ-FP2 (Restricted Wastewater Treatment
Quasi-Public, Institutional Manufacturing-Coastal Zone- Plant
Flood lain)
North of Subject Other Uses: Public, (Q)-M1-CZ (Qualified-Light Vacant
Property Quasi-Public, Institutional Industrial-Coastal Zone)
East of Subject not applicable not applicable Santa Ana River
Property:
South of Subject Open Space-Conservation LUD-CC-CZ-FP2 (Limited Use Huntington Beach
Property(across Orange District-Coastal Conservation- Wetlands -Talbert
County Flood Control Coastal Zone-Floodplain) Marsh
Channel):
West of Subject Residential Low Density RL-FP2 (Low Density Single Family
Property(across and Commercial General Residential-Floodplain)and Residential and
Brookhurst St.): CG-FP2 (Commercial General- Neighborhood
Flood lain) Commercial
Staff Report-4/9/96 2 (PCSR188)
PROJECT PROPOSAL:
Coastal Development Permit No. 95-39 represents a request for the following:
A. To construct a 3.200 square foot pump station pursuant to Section 989.5.2 of the Huntington
.Beach Local Coastal Program (LCP).
B. To construct an 86 foot high hydraulic surge tower, pursuant to Section 989.5.2 of the LCP.
The proposed pump station will replace an existing, smaller station that is approximately 400 square feet
and seven feet high. The new pump station will be located in the vicinity of the existing station along
Brookhurst Street, near the main entrance to the treatment plant, and is approximately 24 feet high. In
general, pump stations are required when fluid cannot be transported via gravity flow. A sewage treatment
plant cannot have a direct connection to a water system; consequently, a physical air gap (separation) is
required. A pump station is necessary to pump the water from the air gap tank. The County Sanitation
Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) reports that as part of their long range construction plans, they had
planned to build a new facility to accommodate demand. However, a pump station that is larger than
originally planned is necessary because of City of Huntington Beach Fire Department requirements.
There are currently two surge towers, No. 1 and No. 2, at the project site. The surge towers reduce surges
in wastewater flow that could otherwise damage outfall pipes that carry treated wastewater to the Pacific
Ocean. The applicant proposes to demolish existing Surge Tower No. 1 ( 55.5 feet high; MSL 69 feet) and
replace it with the proposed 86 foot high structure (98 feet MSL) which will have an inside diameter of 26
feet. The new tower will also be called Surge Tower No. 1 and will be located approximately 400 feet
closer to Pacific Coast Highway, at a distance of approximately 1,200 feet from the roadway. The
applicant has indicated that this new location is necessary because of the presence of seismic faults at the
location of existing Surge Tower No. 1. Similar to the existing Surge Tower No. 1, the proposed surge
tower will have a spiral staircase wrapped around the outside to allow access for inspections. Both surge
towers will be painted gray.
[Please note that the LCP measures height from top of curb, referred to as "grade" in this report.
However, the CSDOC uses mean sea level (MSL) when reporting the height of structures. There is an
approximate 12 foot differential between MSL and grade for the project site. Thus, the CSDOC reports
the proposed Surge Tower No. 1 at 98 feet MSL; this is the equivalent of 86 feet from grade. Both
measurements are provided throughout this report.]
Variance No. 95-32 is a request to permit an 86 foot high surge tower in lieu of 40 ft. (exceeds maximum
building height by 46 feet) pursuant to Section 9510.4 of the LCP. The applicant has indicated that the
variance request is necessary in order to accommodate projected flows. (Attachment No. 3) According to
studies done for the applicant, the maximum water surface level could reach 96 feet (MSL). Because this
is higher than existing Surge Tower No. 2 (76.5 feet grade; 88 feet MSL), it was recommended that the
new Surge Tower No. 1 be built 98 feet high (MSL).
Staff Report-4/9/96 3 (PCSR188)
On January 10, 1996, the Zoning Administrator approved the coastal development permit and the variance
request with conditions of approval (Attachment No. 4) finding that the project was necessary for the
public welfare. The project was appealed by Councilmember Harman on January 18, 1996. His appeal
letter notes that there will be negative visual impacts from Pacific Coast Highway. (Attachment No. 5) On
January 23, 1996, the applicant also appealed the project because of two conditions of approval pertaining
to water issues. (Attachment No. 6) The water issues include the purchase of reclaimed water used to
irrigate landscaping (Condition of Approval No. 7g, as approved by the Zoning Administrator) and the
number of pipes that will be installed (Condition of Approval No. 7c); both are conditions of approval from
the Department of Public Works.
ISSUES:
General Plan Conformance:
The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's General Plan and the Land Use
Element designation of Public, Quasi-Public, Institutional on the subject property. This Land Use
designation specifically allows for utilities. The project, designed to accommodate projected demand,
furthers the General Plan Land Use Goal of"providing utility systems to meet projected demands."
The proposed project is also consistent with the Draft General Plan approved by the Planning Commission
in December, 1995 which maintains the Public land use designation on the subject property.
Zoning Compliance:
This project is located in the M1-A-CZ-FP2 zone (Restricted Manufacturing-Coastal Zone-Floodplain) and
complies with the requirements of that zone with the exception of the subject variance request.
The following is a zoning conformance matrix which compares the proposed project with the development
standards of Chapter 951 of the Huntington Beach Local Coastal Program:
:. :. ,RE: .>R.
9510.04 Building Height 40 ft. Max. 24 ft. -Pump Station
86 ft. -Surge Tower
9510.06 Front Setback 10 ft. Min.; 1 ft. additional
setback for each 1 ft. of height
above 25 ft.
10 ft. Min. for Pump Station 55 ft. -Pump Station
71 ft. Min. for Surge Tower 1,800 ft. - Surge Tower
9510.07 (a) Interior Side Setback 15 ft. Min. 1,475 ft. and 1,485 ft. Pump Station
825 ft. and 2,985 ft. Surge Tower
9510.07 ) Exterior Side Setback Not applicable Not applicable
9510.08 Rear Setback None 1,250 ft. Pump Station
80 ft. Surge Tower
9510.13 Landscaping 6%of site 10 %of site
* Variance request
Staff Report-4/9/96 4 (PCSR188) .
Environmental Status:
The proposed project was previously reviewed and approved in the Joint Treatment Works Wastewater
Master Plan Environmental Impact Report(State Clearing House No. 88012008) certified by the Board of
Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County in June 1989. This environmental document
evaluated the proposed Surge Tower No. 1 with a height of 88 feet (MSL). When studies of the tower
showed it would be necessary to raise the height of the tower 10 feet, the CSDOC prepared a supplement
to the previous environmental impact report. The supplement, Supplement No. 3 to Final Program
Environmental Impact Report for Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities for County Sanitation
Districts of Orange County, California, (State Clearing House No. 94071060) was approved by the Board
of Supervisors in January 1995.
Coastal Status:
The proposed project is within an appealable portion of the Coastal Zone. Coastal Development Permit
No. 95-39 is being processed concurrently with Variance No. 95-32 pursuant to Section 989.5 of the
Huntington Beach Local Coastal Program. The proposed project complies with the zoning code and
Coastal Zone requirements, and will-implement the following policies of the Coastal Element of the
General Plan:
• Improve the appearance of visually degraded areas.
• Promote the provision of adequate community facilities within the Coastal Zone.
Redevelopment Status: Not applicable.
Design Review Board: Not applicable.
Subdivision Committee: Not applicable.
Other Departments Concerns:
The Departments of Public Works and Fire have recommended conditions which are incorporated into the
conditions of approval. The Police Department and Building Division have no concerns.
ANALYSIS:
Appeal by City Councilmember Tom Harman
As noted, this appeal is based on the negative visual impacts of the proposed facilities when viewed from
Pacific Coast Highway. Although the project site is separated from Pacific Coast Highway by the flood
control channel and the wetlands area, many of the plant's existing structures are of substantial size and
height and, as such, are clearly visible from that roadway. The proposed pump station will be 24 feet high
and will be located approximately 2,100 feet from Pacific Coast Highway. Because of that distance and
the size of the pump station, staff does not believe that the pump station will have a noticeable negative
Staff Report-4/9/96 5 (PCSR188)
visual impact for pedestrians and vehicle passengers on Pacific Coast Highway. The pump station will be
more visible, however, from Brookhurst Street than the existing station. Therefore, staff is recommending
that additional landscaping be installed by the applicant between the proposed pump station and the
existing block wall along Brookhurst Street. The applicant is in agreement with this recommendation.
The-.proposed Surge Tower No. 1 will be clearly visible from Pacific Coast Highway, as are the existing
Surge Towers No. 1 and No. 2. Moreover, the applicant proposes to build the surge tower 400 feet closer
to the roadway to minimize potential damage to the structure from seismic shaking. The applicant has
developed a comprehensive landscape plan for the plant to address aesthetic issues. (Attachment No. 7).
This landscape master plan was developed in 1986 and provides the basis from which more detailed
landscape plans are prepared as specific facilities are built or relocated. Pursuant to the proposed surge
tower project and other nearby facilities, the applicant has developed three detailed landscape plans.
(Attachment No. 8) This landscaping will be concentrated along the eastern and southern edges of the
project site, along the Santa Ana River and the wetlands area bordering Pacific Coast Highway, and will
complement existing landscaping that has already been planted by the applicant. One of these plans has
been implemented; the CSDOC intends to complete the other landscaping improvements as soon as
possible in conjunction with the surge tower project.
The Department of Public Works has reviewed these plans and has determined that modifications should be
made with regard to the quantity and type of plant material. In addition, there are other locations on the
project site which could receive additional landscaping. Staff believes that these changes will augment the
CSDOC's plans and assist in buffering views from Pacific Coast Highway. Staff recommends two
conditions of approval to address the landscape plans: 1) submittal of revised landscape plans to the
Department of Public Works for review and comment, and 2)joint review of the CSDOC's landscape
master plan, by the Department of Public Works and the CSDOC, for possible changes. With regard to
staffs second recommendation, the CSDOC has suggested that the City participate in a facility master plan
effort, including a landscape element, that is anticipated to begin late this summer.
Staff has also prepared a conceptual plan for murals to be painted on the surge towers, the existing block
wall that borders the flood control channel south of the project site facing Pacific Coast Highway and the
digesters west of this wall. In concert with the proposed landscaping, the murals could assist in minimizing
the taller structures on the site that are in stark contrast to the surrounding area. The CSDOC currently
does not support the mural concept for several reasons. The CSDOC reports that because of the chemicals
used and materials and temperatures of many of its facilities, most paints will not adhere adequately. Thus,
maintenance of the murals would be a significant burden. The CSDOC staff also believe that enhanced
landscaping will adequately improve the site. Staff recommends that the mural concept be considered as
part of the facilities master plan effort discussed above.
Appeal by County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Condition of Approval No. 7c (reference to Zoning Administrator Conditions of Approval)
This condition addresses the number of pipes that will connect the proposed pump station to the City's
water line. As recommended by the Department of Public Works, and approved by the Zoning
Administrator, there would be two 16 inch water connections. This provides the optimum level of
Staff Report-4/9/96 6 (PCSR188)
protection for the treatment facility. In the event of a fire, for example, if one of the pipes broke the
project site would have a second water supply to fight fires on site.
The applicant believes that two water connections are not necessary and that the City's water system could
adequately be protected by installing one pipe connection with two valves, one on either side of the pipe.
The.applicant notes that they have two back-up water systems at their plant that would ensure a water
source for the project site if the water connection pipe were to break. The Department of Public Works
believes the condition benefits the applicant but is willing to revise the condition (to require one connection
instead of two) if the applicant acknowledges the potential risk in writing from a CSDOC Director. The
applicant has indicated that they believe one water connection pipe is adequate and requests the condition
be removed. (Attachment No. 9) Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the project with
one 16 inch water connection, pending the Department of Public Works' receipt of acceptable
correspondence from the CSDOC.
Condition of Approval No. 7g (reference to Zoning Administrator Conditions of Approval)
This condition requires that the applicant purchase any reclaimed water to be used for irrigating
landscaping from the City of Huntington Beach. The Public Works Department required this condition of
approval because of the City's 1991 agreement with Orange County Water District (OCWD)*which
identifies the CSDOC as a potential purchaser of reclaimed water from City of Huntington Beach. This
agreement, however, appears to be in conflict with a 1993 agreement between the OCWD and the CSDOC
which stipulates that the CSDOC receive its reclaimed water from the OCWD. Additionally, that
agreement requires that the CSDOC provide the reclaimed water (with secondary treatment) to the OCWD
free of charge. (The reclaimed water that the CSDOC receives back from the OCWD has tertiary
treatment.)
The applicant does not think that it is reasonable, nor practical, to receive and buy reclaimed water from
the City of Huntington Beach for two reasons. First, it provides the water free of charge to the OCWD,
which in turn treats the water and sells it to the City. Second, per a related agreement with OCWD, it has
pipes which deliver and receive reclaimed water directly to and from the OCWD that do not require it to
use or tap into City lines. The Department of Public Works has requested a legal opinion from the City
Attorney regarding the reclaimed water and that decision is pending. Staff believes that the contractual
issue is outside the purview of the entitlement process, however, and recommends that the Planning
Commission remove this condition of approval and take action on the request.
SUMMARY:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission uphold the Zoning Administrator's approval of Coastal
Development Permit No. 95-39 and Variance No. 95-32 with findings and revised conditions of approval
based on the following considerations:
The pump station and surge tower have been designed to meet projected demand. These two
components are integral to the operations of the wastewater treatment plant which provides a service
that is essential for the health and safety of Huntington Beach residents and businesses.
Staff Report-4/9/96 7 (PCSR188)
+ The facilities master plan effort will evaluate aesthetics of the site, including landscape and mural
alternatives, and will result in projects that will minimize negative visual impacts of the facilities.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
The Planning Commission may take either of the following two (2) alternative actions:
A. Deny Coastal Development Permit No. 95-39Nariance No. 95-32 with findings for denial.
B. Continue Coastal Development Permit No. 95-39/Variance No. 95-32 and direct staff accordingly.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Findings and Suggested Conditions of Approval
2. Site Plan, Floor Plans and Elevations dated November 13, 1995 and December 19, 1995
3. Narrative
4. Minutes of Zoning Administrator Meeting dated January 10, 1996 (includes Conditions of Approval)
5. Appeal letter from Councilmember Harman dated January 18, 1996
6. Appeal letter from County Sanitation Districts of Orange County dated January 23, 1996'-"-
7. Landscape Master Plan dated 1986
8. Detailed Landscape Plans dated February 15, 1996
9. Letter from County Sanitation Districts of Orange County dated March 12, 1996
10. Letter in Opposition from Jon Ely dated January 8, 1996
11. Letter in Opposition from John Warde dated March 29, 1996
SH:MBB:kjl
Staff Report-4/9/96 8 (PCSR188)
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
FINDINGS AND SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 95-39/
VARIANCE NO. 95-32
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 95-39:
1. The request to permit a 3,200 square foot pump station and an 86 foot high surge tower conforms with
the plans, policies, requirements and standards of the Coastal Element of the General Plan. The
proposed landscaping and mural improvements will improve the appearance of the treatment facility,
and completion of the project will promote the Coastal Element goal of providing adequate community
facilities within the Coastal Zone. The surge tower will be located at a facility which already includes
several other towers and structures which, because of their size, height and stark appearance, may be
considered to impact views. The proposed tower will not significantly add to these impacts but
because of its height will be visible from Pacific Coast Highway. The proposed landscaping
improvements are designed to minimize impacts of the proposed tower and existing structures.
Further, the tower will be located at the southeasterly end of the site and will not be visible from the
residences on the west side of Brookhurst Avenue. The proposed pump station and surge tower will
not impact public access because they are in an area where none exists.
2. Coastal Development Permit No. 95-39 is consistent with the CZ suffix zoning requirements, the MI-A
Zoning District, as well as other provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code applicable to the
property. The proposed development will conform with all applicable City codes. The proposed pump
station and surge tower involve the reconstruction and relocation of existing facilities located within the
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Wastewater Treatment Plant No. 2. The pump station
will conform to all applicable City codes. The surge tower will conform to all City codes with the
exception of the maximum height limit of 40 feet. The overall 86 foot height of the proposed surge
tower has been approved through the granting of Variance Number 95-32 which has been processed
concurrently with the Coastal Development Permit.
3. At the time of commencement of operations, the proposed pump station and surge tower will be
provided with infrastructure in a manner that is consistent with the Coastal Element of the General
Plan. Infrastructure currently exists to the site. Any modifications to infrastructure required as a result
of development of this project have been included as conditions of approval.
4. The proposed pump station and surge tower conform with the public access and public recreation
policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. No public access or recreational opportunities will
be affected by the new construction.
Attachment-4/9/96 (PCSR188-9)
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL- VARIANCE NO. 95-32:
1. The granting of a variance for an 86 foot high surge tower ( 98 feet MSL) in lieu of maximum 40 foot
height will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon other properties
in the vicinity and under an identical zone classification. The proposed surge tower will be part of the
facilities at the existing County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Wastewater Treatment Plant 2.
This land use is necessary for the health and safety of the residents and businesses of Huntington
Beach. The height of the surge tower is necessary to accommodate the increased wastewater treatment
capacity necessitated by current and projected population increases. Any land use in an identical
zoning classification which provided a service that was critical for the health and safety of City
residents and businesses could be anticipated to be granted a similar variance that_was deemed
necessary for health and safety reasons.
2. Because of special circumstances applicable to.the subject property, including size, shape, topography,
location or surroundings, the strict application of the zoning ordinance is found to deprive the subject
property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classification.
Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would deprive the property of its ability to operate the
Treatment Plant at its optimum capacity and accommodate future demand. Other industrial uses in the
M1-A zoning classification can operate optimally because their successful operation is not determined
solely by their ability to directly accommodate population increases.
3. The granting of a variance is necessary to preserve the enjoyment of one or more substantial property
rights. In order for the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County to meet the wastewater
treatment needs of the regional population, it must have the capacity to function at a level which meets
these needs. As the population grows, the waste treatment capacity must also increase. The height of
the surge tower is determined by the capacity of the treatment plant. Granting a variance from the
height restrictions will enable the Treatment Plant to continue to provide the service it was granted
approval to provide at this specific site.
4. The granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
property in the same zone classification and is consistent with the General Plan. The granting of a
variance will enhance the public welfare because it ensures that the County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County can provide adequate wastewater treatment service which is necessary for the health
and safety of the residents and businesses of Huntington Beach.
SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
NO. 95-39/VARIANCE NO. 95-32:
1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated November 13, 1995 for the surge tower
and December 12, 1995 for the pump station shall be the conceptually approved layout.
2. The applicant shall work with the Department of Public Works to augment the Landscape Plans dated
February 15, 1996. The applicant shall submit revised landscape plans to the Public Works Department
for review and approval within three months of this approval. The revised landscape plan shall also be
Attachment-4/9/96 (PCSR188-10)
submitted to the Planning Commission for information. The Landscape Plans shall include the
following:
a. Additional landscaping between the proposed pump station and the blockwall along Brookhurst
Street. The plant material shall be of sufficient height to effectively screen the portion of the
proposed pump station that will extend above the existing blockwall and shall be installed within
the one month of completion of the pump station.
b.. A phasing plan identifying timing for landcape improvements to be completed over the next two
years.
3. The applicant shall include the City of Huntington Beach as a team member in its facilities master plan
effort, including the development of a landscape element. The facilities master plan will examine ways
in which to improve the aesthetics of the project site, including landscaping and muraling. (PW)
4. Prior to construction, the applicant shall comply with the following:
a. A flood-proofing certificate shall be provided to the Planning Division.
b. Submit drawings for the proposed water system improvements to the Water Division for review
and approval. All water system improvements shall be designed and installed per the City of
Huntington Beach Water Division's Standard Plans, Specifications and Design Criteria. (PW)
5. The use shall comply with the following:
a. Insure that the water system is capable of meeting the required fire flow of 2500 GPM. (FD)
b. The proposed water system improvements shall conform to the State Department of Health
Services California Code of Regulations, Title 17, including Section 7603 titled"Location of
Backflow Preventers, subsection (a); "Air-gap Separation." The water service lateral between the
property line and the air-gap tank shall be located a minimum of six (6) inches above ground and
painted medium blue, Dunn-Edwards No. 10-1-VF51652, with white stenciling. The stenciling
shall appear on both sides of the pipe with the marking"City Potable Water" in one-inch letters
repeated every 24 inches. (PW)
c. If the meters are not to be located in the public right-of-way, the applicant shall be responsible for
the preparation and execution of all utility easements/agreements required by the City granting the
City the same rights and privileges as if the meters were located in the public right-of-way. These
rights and privileges shall include (but are not limited to) 24 hour access, maintenance and testing.
The City shall be responsible for the ownership and maintenance of the water facilities/
appurtenances between the mainline and up to and including the meter assembly. (PW)
d. The water system design shall include appropriate water hammer protection, consistent with
documented civil engineering industry practices, and acceptable to the Water Division. (PW)
Attachment-4/9/96 (PCSR188=11)
e. The project shall be served by a minimum of two (2) water service connections from the sixteen-
inch water main in Brookhurst Street. Should the applicant submit a written acceptance of risk,
signed by a CSDOC Director and acceptable to the Department of Public Works, addressing the
number of water service connections, a minimum of one (1) water service connection from the
sixteen inch water main in Brookhurst Street will be required in lieu of the two (2) water service
connections. A sixteen-inch valve in the mainline shall be constructed between the two
connections. This service connection shall not be joined together on the"public" side of the
meter. (PW)
f. All existing water services shall be abandoned at the water main per City of Huntington Beach
Water Division's Standard Plans and Specifications prior to the City's final acceptance of the
proposed water system improvements. This includes any irrigation services currently serving the
site. (PW)
g. The landscape areas and murals shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner.
h. Note on plans: Fire extinguishers shall be provided and located in areas to comply with the
Huntington Beach Fire Code Standards.
6. The Planning Commission shall be notified in writing if any changes in structure height, floor area,
setbacks, building elevations or open space are proposed as a result of the plan check process. The
Zoning Administrator reserves the right to require that an amendment to the original entitlement be
processed if the proposed changes are of a substantial nature.
7. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be
disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them.
INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REOUIREMENTS:
1. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State, and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards.
2. The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management
District.
3. The applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit for work done in the public right-of-way.
4. Landscaping shall comply with Section 9607 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code.
5. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Coastal Development Permit No. 95-39/
Variance No. 95-32 if any violation of these conditions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code
occurs.
6. Coastal Development Permit No. 95-39/Variance No. 95-32 shall become null and void unless
exercised within one year of the date of final approval or such extension of time as may be granted by
Attachment-4/9/96 (PCSR188-12)
the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Department of Community Development a
minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date.
Attachment-4/9/96 (PCSR188-13)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
November 13, 1995
phone:
(714)962-2411 Jane Madera, Assistant Planner
Department of Community Development
mailing address:
P.O. Box 8127 City of Huntington Beach
%untain Valley, CA 2000 Main Street
92728-8127 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
street address:
0644 Ellis Avenue
-ourrmin Valley, CA SUBJECT: Request for Coastal Commission Permit, Job No. J-34-1
92708-7018
You will recall our earlier letters regarding our request for a Coastal Commission
Permit, for our.Job No. J-34-1, Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades. The principal
Member item in this project is the rebuilding of the Surge Tower 400-feet closer to the ocean
Agencies and 10-feet higher than planned in the 1989 Program EIR (total rise is 31-feet, a 21-
foot extension was called for in 1989). The relocation is required since the existing
Cities Surge Tower is located on a recently discovered earthquake fault fracture.
Anaheim
~` Brea Enclosed is an answer sheet which summarizes the items we have prepared to
"
.-Buena Park support our Coastal Commission Application, as well as all other items requested.
- Cypress
=-Fountain Valley Our check for the permit, in the amount of 5955.00 is being sent directly to you by
Fullerton separate cover. If you have any questions please contact Tom Dawes at
lun�arigton Beach (714 962-2411 extension 5080.
'- Irvine
La Habra
Le Palma
`'az os Alamitos
...New Beach
; Orange
Placentia
I'WI' anta Ana . David A. l-udwin, P.E.
eal Beach Director of Engineering
Stanton
- '" Tustin
ISMi nta Park TD:dl
4orba Linda EngU-34 111 11395.11
of Orange
: Enclosures
)an ...Districts
-sta Mesa
erden Grove
id way City-
Watae..Mistricts
wine Ranch
MENT N0. 3 I
A Public Wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Committed to Protecting the Environment Since 1954
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
November 13 , 1995
phone:
(7141962.2411 County Sanitation Districts of orange County
Request for Coastal Commission Permit
mailing address: Job No. J—3 4—1
'P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA
92728-8127
street address:
0844 Ellis Avenue Application Requirements
Fountain Valley. CA
92708-7/0 i o
4 . REQUIREMENT: Zoning Administrator: Six (6) sets of
site plans, floor plans and building elevations a
maximum of 24" X 36" in size, and one(1) set of plans
Member reduced to 8-1/2" X 11" . Other plans may be required
Agencies depending on . the complexity of the project .
m
Cities ANSWER: Attached are six sets of full size 24" X- 3-6"
Anaheim
plans and one set of 8-1/2" X 1_1" reduced set
B,^ea of plans.
Buena Park
Cypress 6 . ALL PLANS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING REOUIREMENTS
:_Fountain Valley
Fullerton
44ntington Beach a) Draw to scale (minimum scale 1/8" or 301 ) ; indicate
Irvine scale; indicate dimensions of building and floor uses
.La Habre
Le Palma and north direction arrow. Plans shall be oriented so.
—MsAlamitos that north is at the top of the page.
;Ve. rt Beach
Orange
Placentia b) Plot the entire parcel and dimension all pertinent data
such as easements, driveways, landscaping, parking, and
V -,R;alBeach distances -o all property lines.
Stanton
Villa Park c) Plot all existing and proposed physical features and
M25orbaLinda structures on the subject property and abutting
%ouof Orange properties.
2anft 'Districts d) Dimension to the nearest intersecting street and
identify all street names.
sta Mesa
-�rdan Grove
'idwayCity e) Include a legend (locate in lower right corner of the
r site plan) which lists the name, address, and phone
Wat .-Districts
number of the recorded owner and the applicant.
wine Ranch
1 f) Identify the legal description of the subject property
on the site plan.
M . I OF 5
,.__: :,� ;. r
_ NO. 3
A Public Wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Committed to Protecting the Environment Since 1954
LF
g) Label uses of each room on floor plan.
ANSWER: Attached are sets of plans with information
requested for (a) , (b) , (c) , (d) , (e) , (f) &
(9)
7 . REOUIREMENT: Fold all plans to a maximum size of 8-1/2"
X 14" (lower right corner out) .
ANSWER: Attached are sets of plans folded to 8-1/2" X
14" with lower right corner out.
8 . REOUIREMENT: A signed statement declaring whether the
project site is or is not located within a Hazardous
Waste and Substance site in accordance with District Ma_D
22 (per Cathy Johnson) .
ANSWER: The project is not located within a Hazardous
Waste and Substance site pursuant to Section
65962 . 5 of the Government Code.
9 . REOUIREMENT: Public notification requirements for
Coastal Development Permit, Zone Change, Precise Plan
Street Alignment, General Plan Amendment, Special Sign
Permit and Limited Sign Permit.
ANSWER: Please see attached Public notification
requirements as described in (B) 1, 2 & 3 for
Coastal Development Permit as prepared by
Suzan Case Ownership Services Company.
10. REOUIREMENT: All Planning Commission items require
photographs and slides of thesubject site andf
surrounding properties. All other entitlements require
photographs only.
ANSWER: Please see attached aerial and elevation
photos of surrounding area around our project.
13 .
a) QUESTION: Cite reasons for initiating this application?
ANSWER: Project Description
The outfall reliability project will be constructed at
County Sanitation District Treatment Plant No. 2 located
2OF5
in Huntington Beach, California adjacent to the Santa
Ana River mouth, north of Pacific Coast Highway and
east of Brookhurst Avenue. The project includes
modifications to the existing ocean outfall system to
provide new on-shore piping, valving, and construction of
a new surge tower and modifications to an existing surge
tower. Our new surge tower will be 400 feet to the
south of our existing Surge Towers, and rise to an
elevation of 98 feet (MSL) , some 10 feet higher than
planned in the 1989 Program EiR.
The Districts ocean outfall facilities consist of three
booster pump stations, two surge towers and three
discharges (two to the ocean via outfall and an
emergency overflow to the Santa Ana River) . Primary and
secondary treated wastewater from both plants is
transferred to the ocean outfall facilities via the
interplant '.pipelines. under normal operation
conditions, the co-mingled effluents are pumped through
the 120-inch diameter ocean outfall (Discharge 001)
placed into service in 1971. This outfall replaced an
older 78-inch-diameter outfall which is still available
for standby service.
Surge Tower No. 1 and No. 2 reduce surges in wastewater
flow that could otherwise damage the outfall pipes. New
Surge Tower No. 1 serves the standby emergency 78-inch
outfall (Discharge No. 002) and existing Surge Tower No.
2 serves the active 120-inch-diameter outfall (Discharge
001) .
The new proposed surge tower will be a 98-foot tall
round concrete structure some 26 feet (inside) in
diameter which will have a spiral staircase wrapped
around the outside to provide access to the open top for
inspections and observations. This new structure will
be designated Surge Tower No. l and replace an existing
structure located 400 feet to the north which will be
demolished once the replacement tower is operational.
There will be new piping and valving which will connect
the two surge towers with both ocean outfall . The plan
also includes the addition of a valve station connecting
outfall 001 and 002 downstream of the surge
instrumentation. Overall the project costs are
estimated to be in the range of $5 . 5-$6 million.
3OF5
b) QUESTION: Description and population served by the
proposed use of .project?
ANSWER: The area served is the westerly portion of
Orange County, including 23 cities. The
population served is approximately 2 , 100 , 000 .
c) QUESTION: Description of project and services, including
square footage, hours and days of operation, number of
employees, and other information as appropriate?
ANSWER: :or description of the project, please refer
Co 13 (a) . The treatment Plant is manned 24
hours a day.
d) QUESTION: Description of surrounding uses to the North,
South, East and West?
ANSWER: To the North; Treatment Plant.
ANSWER: To the South; Pacific Coast Highway and Ocean.
ANSWER: To the East; Santa Ana River.
ANSWER: To the West; Treatment Plant.
Support of Findings for Approval of Coastal Permit.
14 .
a) OUESTION: What Exceptional circumstances apply to the
subject property (including size, shape, topography,
location or surroundings) that deprive it of privileges
normally enjoyed?
ANSWER: This site has been used for forty years for
the treatment of wastewater for the western
portions of Orange County.
b) QUESTION: Explain why the request will not constitute a
grant of special privilege inconsistent with normal
limitations?
ANSWER: This project is the replacement of an existing
Surge Tower which is not structurally or
hydraulically adequate.
c) QUESTION: Why is this request necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment of one or more substantial
property rights?
4OF5 ``
•.S.c:
ANSWER: This project is necessary for the welfare of
the citizens of Orange County.
d) QUESTION: State reasons why the granting of this request
will not be materially detrimental to the public
welfare.
ANSWER: This project is .for the public welfare.
Eng\tmd\planning\psd.pft
TMDAI
50F5
MINUTES
HUNTINGTON BEACH OFFICE OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
Room B-6 - Civic Center
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach. California
WEDNESDAY. JANUARY 10. 1996 - 1:30 P.M.
ZONrN- G ADMINIISTRATOR: Michael Strange
STAFF MEMBERS. Susan Pierce, Catherine Johnson, Mary Beth Broeren, Lisa
Koch
MINUTES: None
ORAL COTyLNAUNICATION: None
ITEM 1: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-96
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD NO. 95-52
(CONTINUED FROM 01-03-96)
Applicant: Evergreen Devco, Inc. - Brett Heron,
Request: To permit a 1,900 square foot retail pharmacy with two (2) drive-through
lanes.
Location: 17502 Beach Boulevard (southeast corner of Beach Boulevard and Slater
Avenue)
Susan Pierce, staff planner, stated that this application was continued from January 3, 1996, to
allow the City and the applicant an opportunity to investigate whether or not the utility pole,
located at the south side of Slater Avenue, should be removed and all utilities be located
underground. The applicant has been in communication with the telephone company and has
expressed concern over the cost of undergrounding.
Bruce Crosby, Public Works engineer, stated that in regards to the driveway facing Slater
Avenue, he recommends the condition read, "The existing driveway on Slater Avenue shall be
removed in the event the redesign does not conform to the requirements of the Traffic Engineer."
Mr. Crosby recommended that the second item of concern, the undergrounding of utilities, be
executed. Public Works does not see this as placing a hardship on the applicant. Under normal
circumstances, the applicant would have an obligation to conduct off-site improvements.
iPA,ENT NO. '4. I
]anuary 10. 1996 Zoning Administr fleeting Minutes
Page 2
However, the City has already completed improvements on the surrounding streets of the subject
property. Thus, the cost of undergrounding is not excessive compared to the cost that would
have incurred if off-site improvements were necessary.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED.
Mr. O'Neil, legal representative for Evergreen Devco Inc., was present and submitted a copy of
the "pork chop" design for the entrance off of Slater, as well as the estimated costs for
undergrounding the utilities. Mr. O'Neil stated that the actual costs involved with
undergrounding are excessive and unreasonable.
Brett Heron, applicant, requested that the curb cut off of Slater be approved with the "pork chop"
design median and that the underarounding of utilities not be necessary. Mr. Heron stated that
the costs involved with underarounding are more excessive than Public Works' estimates.
THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE
REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-96/DESIGN REVIEW BOARD NO. 95-52 WAS
CONDITIONALLY APPROVED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. HE STATED
THAT THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR CAN BE
APPEALED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION WITHIN TEN (10) CALENDAR
DAYS.
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-96 /DESIGN
REVIEW BOARD NO. 95-52:
1. The establishment, maintenance and operation of an 1,900 square feet pharmacy with two
drive-through lanes will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons residing or
working in the vicinity nor detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in
the neighborhood. Parking will be provided for the proposed use in excess of the
minimum requirements of Chapter 231 of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. A
stacking area for vehicles is available for cars waiting to enter the drive-through lanes.
Reciprocal access will be provided to the property located south ofthe subject site.
Construction will be in compliance with regulations of the Uniform Building Code.
2. The granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 95-96 and Design Review Board No. 95-52
to permit construction of an 1,900 square feet pharmacy with two drive-through lanes will
not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. The goals of the
Land Use Element for commercial districts are to insure commercial development that is
economically viable, attractive, well related to other land uses, and satisfies the needs of
the City's residents and to promote.the development of services and facilities necessary to
support a tourist industry. The General Commercial land use designation allows for these
types of commercial uses. The proposed project with one access to Beach Boulevard will
not impact the circulation on the major highway. The Design Review Board has reviewed
and recommended approval of the architectural design of the proposed structure.
(g:zamin:0110)
14. z
]anuan.10,1996 Zoning Administra, Aeeting Minutes
Page 3
3. The proposed use will comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable
provisions in Titles 20-25 and any specific condition required for the proposed use in the
district in which it would be located. The proposed site plan depicts setbacks, building
height, floor area ratio, landscaping, and parking in compliance with the requirements
applicable to the CG, General Commercial District.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERINUT NO. 95-96 /
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD NO. 95-52:
1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated December 5, 1995 shall be the
conceptually approved layout with the following, modifications:
a. The proposed chain link fencing shall be a maximum six feet in height and shall be
constructed of black, dark blue, or dark green vinyl coated chain link with no slats.
b. Lightina shall be installed under the front and rear roof projections and drive-
through overhangs.
c. The driveway-on Slater Avenue shall be revised to provide a"pork-chop" desian
as shown on a plan received January 10, 1996,
2. The Zoning Administrator shall be notified in writing if any changes in building height,
floor area, setbacks, building elevations or open space are proposed as a result of the plan
check process. Building permits shall not be issued until the Zoning Administrator has
reviewed and approved the proposed changes. The Zoning Admnistrator reserves the
right to require that an amendment to the original entitlement be processed if the proposed
changes are of a substantial nature.
3. Conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on the cover sheet of all working drawing
sets submitted for plancheck.
4. Prior to submittal for building permits, the following shall be completed:
a. Depict all utility apparatus, such as but not limited to back flow devices and Edison
transformers, on the site plan.
b. Fire Department requirements shall be noted on the building plans:
1) Fire extinguishers will be installed and located in areas to comply with Huntington
Beach Fire Code Standards.
2) Address numbers will be installed to comply with City Specification No. 428.
c. Elevations shall depict colors and building materials proposed and recommended by the
Design Review Board.
(g:zamin:0110)
January 10, 1996 Zoning Administra. ..feeling Minutes
Page 4
d. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened from any view. Said screening shall
be architecturally compatible with the building in terms of materials and colors. If
screening is not designed specifically into the building, a rooftop mechanical equipment
plan must be submitted showing screening and must be approved.
e. If outdoor lighting is included, high-pressure sodium vapor lamps or similar energy
savings lamps shall be used. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage"
onto adjacent properties and shall be noted on the site plan and elevations.
f A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer. This analysis
shall include on-site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed
recommendations regarding grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations, retaining
walls, streets, and utilities.
g. Detail all handicapped access requirements on the plans.
h. Provide occupant loads for all rooms and calculations for same on building plans.
5. Prior to issuance of building permits, the following plans and items shall be submitted-and/or
completed by the applicant:
a. Four sets of landscape and irrigation plans to the Department of Public Works for review
and approval. Said landscape pian shall include an inventory of trees proposed to be
removed with the trunk diameter at 4 ft.-6 in. above grade, quantity, and type of tree
indicated. The landscape construction set shall include a landscape plan prepared and
signed by a State Licensed Landscape Architect which includes all proposed/existing plant
materials (location, type, size, quantity), irrigation plan, grading plan and approved site
plan, and a copy of conditions of approval. The landscape plan shall be in conformance
with Chapter 232 of the Huntington Beach Zonin; and Subdivision Ordinance and
Chapter 14.52 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code.. The set must be complete and
approved by the Departments of Public Works and Community Development prior to
issuance of building permits.
b. .A grading plan to the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
c. The subject property owner shall enter into irrevocable reciprocal driveway easement
between the subject site and the adjacent property to the south. A copy of the legal
instrument shall be approved by the City Attorney as to form and content and, when
approved, shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder. A copy shall be filed
with the Department of Community Development prior to occupancy.
d. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid.
(g:zaff=:0110)
j�`AENTNO. J ,
January 10, 1996 Zoning Administra— ,.Ieeting Minutes
Page 5
6. Prior to final approval of the building permit (or issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy), the
following shall be completed:
a. The existing driveway on Cameron Street shall be modified to conform to Standard Plan
No. 211 (radius type driveway).
b. The badly deteriorated paving adjacent to the gutter on Slater Avenue and the curb return
shall be removed and replaced to 2 feet from the gutter.
c. Remove and replace the damaged curb and gutter on Cameron Street.
d. Install wheel chair ramp at Slater Avenue and Cameros, Street.
e. All existing power poles on Slater Avenue adjacent to the site shall be installed
underground.
f The water system shall be designed and installed per the City of Huntington Beach Water
Division's design criteria, standard plans and specifications.
g. All improvements (including landscaping) to the property shall be completed in
accordance with the approved plans and conditions of approval specified herein.
7. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable
material, shall.be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them.
8. If lighting is included in the parking lot, high-pressure sodium vapor lamps shall be used
for energy savings. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto
adjacent properties.
INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REOUIREMENTS:
1. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Huntington Beach Zoning
and Subdivision Ordinance, Building Division, and Fire Department. as well as all applicable
local, State, and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards.
2. The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality
Management District.
3. The applicant shall obtain a CalTranss-permit for all work within the State right-of-way.
4. Traffic impact fees shall be paid at the time of Certificate of Occupancy or final inspection.
5. Construction shall be limited to Monday-Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall
be prohibited on Sundays and Federal holidays.
(gzamin:0110) `
Ii �NT NO•
January 10.1996 Zoning Administrat.. Meeting Minutes
Page 6
6. Utility meters, transformers, and backflow devices shall comply with Section 230.76 of the
Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance.
7. The Zoning Administrator reserves the right to revoke Conditional Use Permit No. 95-85 if
any violation of these conditions of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance
occurs.
ITEM 2: COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERiMIT NO. 95-39
VARIANCE NO. 95-32
(CONTINUED FROM 01-03-96)
Applicant: Orange County Sanitation District
Request: The construction of a new 3,200 square foot pump station and the
reconstruction of an existing hydraulic surge tower. A variance is
requested for the 98 foot high tower which exceeds the maximum 50 feet
height permitted by code.
Location: Orange County Sanitation District Wastewater Treatment Plant Number 2,
22212 Brookhurst Avenue (approximately 2,200 feet north of Pacific
Coast Highway, adjacent to the Santa Ana River)
Cathy Johnson, staff planner, stated that this was a proposal for the reconstruction of a surge
tower and pump station. The proposed surge tower will be a replacement for an existing surge
tower that will be demolished. The oruosed surge tower will be placed 82 feet west of the
property line, will be 98 feet tall and 26 feet in diameter. The application also includes a 3,200
square foot pump station to be located approximately 50 feet from Brookhurst. Ms. Johnson
stated that two (2) phone calls were received expressing concerns over the height of the surge
tower and one letter requesting that the project be denied. Staff recommended approval of this
request based on the project's necessity for the health and safety ofthe community to
accommodate increased demand.
THE PUBLIC HEARI\i`G WAS OPENED.
Tom Dawes, representative from the Orange County Sanitation District, stated that the height of
the tower must be equal to the water pressure. It was noted that there are no other design
solutions possible. The height of the tower is completely independent of the size of the structure
and making the tower shorter and wider would not fulfill the same functional requirement which
necessitates the 98 foot height. Mr. Dawes presented an altered photograph that illustrated what
the facility would look like with the proposed surge tower and pump station. Mr. Dawes stated
that the plant construction would be interior and no traffic would be generated.
Madeline Ondoor, area resident, stated that she was not notified of this project. Ms. Ondoor
requested clarification on why the existing tower had to be demolished and if it was completely
necessary.
(B:zamin:0110) ANT N0. _1—
January 10,1996 Zoning Administra- .fleeting Minutes
Page 7
Frank Horzewski, area resident, questioned approximately how long the project would take until
its completion. It was noted that the project would take a year and a half(1 1/2) to two (2) years.
THERE WERE NO OTHER PERSONS PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THE
REQUEST AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 95-39NARIANCE NO. 95-32 WAS
CONDITIONALLY APPROVED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. HE STATED
THAT THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE ZONLNG ADMINISTRATOR CAN BE
APPEALED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION WITHIN TEN (10) CALENDAR
DAYS.
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL- COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 95-39:
1. The request to permit a pump station and surge tower conforms with the plans, policies,
requirements and standards ofthe Coastal Element of the General Plan. The proposed
pump station and surge tower will not impact public views and access because they are in
an area where none exist. Because of the significant height (98 feet) ofthe surge tower, it
will be visible from Pacific Coast Highway. However, the tower will be located at.a
facility which already includes several other towers and structures which, because of their
size, height and stark appearance, may be considered to impact views. The proposed
tower will not significantly add to these impacts. Further, the tower will be located at the
southeasterly end of the site and will not be visible from the residences on the west side of
Brookhurst Avenue.
2. Coastal Development Permit No. 95-39 is consistent with the CZ su�;x zoning
requirements, the M1-A Zoning District, as well as other provisions of the Huntington
Beach Ordinance Code applicable to the property. The proposed development will
conform with all applicable City codes. The proposed pump station and surge tower
involve the reconstruction and relocation of existing facilities located within the Orange
County Sanitation District Wastewater Treatment Plant No. 2. The pump station will
conform to all applicable City codes. The surge tower will conform to all City codes with
the exception of the maximum height limit of 40 feet. The overall 98 foot height of the
proposed surge tower has been approved through the granting of Variance Number 95-32
which has been processed concurrently with the Coastal Development Permit.
3. At the time of commencement of operations, the proposed pump station and surge tower
will be provided with infrastructure in a manner that is consistent with the coastal element
of the General Plan. Infrastructure currently exists to the site. Any modifications to
infrastructure required as a result of development of this project have been included as
conditions of approval.
4. The proposed pump station and surge tower conforms with the public access and public
recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. No public access or
recreational opportunities will be affected by the new construction.
(g:zamin:0110)
January 10, 1996 Zoning Administr. .Meeting Minutes
Page 8
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL- VARIANCE NO. 95-32:
1. The granting of a variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with
limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and under an identical zone classification.
The proposed surge tower will be part of the facilities at the existing Orange County
Sanitation District Wastewater Treatment Plant 2. This land use is necessary for the
health and safety of the residents of Huntington Beach. The 98 foot height of the surge
tower is necessary to accommodate the increased wastewater treatment capacity
necessitated by current and projected population increases. Any land use in an identical
zoning classification .N,hlch provided a service that is critical for the health and safety of
City residents could be anticipated to be granted any variances that were deemed
necessary to insure the health and safety of the residents of Huntington Beach.
2. Because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape,
topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of the zoning ordinance is
found to deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the
vicinity and under identical zone classification. In order for the Sanitation District to meet
the waste treatment needs of the regional population, it must have the capacity to function
at a level which meets-these needs. As the population grows, the waste treatment_eapacity
must also increase. The height of the surge tower is determined by the capacity of the
treatment plant. Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would deprive the property of
its ability to accommodate the Treatment Plant at its optimum capacity. Other industrial
uses in the MI-A zoning classification can operate optimally, because their successful
operation is not determined solely by their ability to directly accommodate population
increases.
3. The granting of a variance is necessary to preserve the enjoyment of one or more
substantial property rights. Granting a variance from the height restrictions will allow the
Treatment Plant to provide the service it was granted approval to provide at this specific
site.
4. The granting ofthe variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious to property in the same zone classification and is consistent with the General
Plan. The granting of a variance will enhance the public welfare because it ensures that
the sanitation district can provide adequate wastewater treatment service which is
necessary for the health and safety of the residents of Huntington Beach.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated November 13, 1995 for the
surge tower and December 12, 1995 for the pump station shall be the conceptually
approved layout.
2. The Zoning Administrator shall be notified in writing if any changes in structure height,
floor area, setbacks, building elevations or open space are proposed as a result of the plan
(g:zamin:0110)
January 10, 1996 Zoning Administra— ..Ieeting Minutes
Page 9
check process. The Zoning Administrator reserves the right to require that an amendment
to the original entitlement be processed if the proposed changes are of a substantial nature.
3. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable
material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them.
4. Prior to construction, a flood-proofing certificate shall be provided to the Planning
Division.
5. Provide landscape architect's plans for review and approval of screening plant material
and irrigation.
6. The Fire Department requirements are:
a. Insure that the water system is capable of meeting the required fire flow of 2500
GPM.
b. Note on plans: Fire extinguishers will be provided and located in areas to comply
with the Huntington Beach Fire Code Standards.
7. The Public Works Department requirements are:
a. All water system improvements shall be designed and installed per the City of
Huntington Beach Water Division's Standard Plans, Specifications and Design
Criteria. Drawings for the proposed water system improvements shall be approved
by the Water Division prior to construction.
b. The proposed water system improvements shall conform to the State Department
of Health Services California Code of Regulations, Title 17, including Section
7603 titled "Location of Backflow Preventers, subsection (a); "Air-gap
Separation." The water service lateral between the property line and the air-gap
tank shall be located a minimum of six(6) inches above ground and painted
medium blue, Dunn-Edwards No. 10-1-VF51652, with white stenciling. The
stenciling shall appear on both sides of the pipe with the marking"City Potable
Water" in one-inch letters repeated every 24 inches.
c. The project shall be served by a minimum of two (2) water service connections
from the sixteen-inch water main in Brookhurst Street. A sixteen-inch valve in the
mainline shall be constructed between the two connections. These service
connections shall not be joined together on the"public" side of the meter.
d. If the meters are not to be located in the public right-of-way, the developer shall be
responsible for the preparation and execution of all utility easements/agreements
required by the City granting the City the same rights and privileges as if the
meters were located in the public right-of-way. These rights and privileges shall
include (but are not limited to) 24 hour access, maintenance and testing, etc. The
(g:zamin:0110)
January 10, 1996 Zoning Administrai-. ..leeting Minutes
Page 10
City shall be responsible for the ownership and maintenance of the water
facilities/appurtenances between the mainline and up to and including the meter
assembly.
e. The water system design shall include.appropriate water hammer protection,
consistent with documented civil engineering industry practices, and acceptable to
the Water Division.
f. All existing water services shall be abandoned at the water main per City of
Huntington beach Water Division's Standard Plans and Specifications prior to the
City's final acceptance of the proposed water system improvements. This includes
any irrigation services currently serving the site.
g. Should reclaimed water be used to irrigate on-site landscaping, such water shall be
purchased from the City of Huntington Beach.
INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REOUIRENT TENTS:
1. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State, and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances,
and standards.
2. The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality
Management District.
3. Landscaping shall comply with Section 9607 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code.
4. The Zoning Administrator reserves the right to revoke Coastal Development Permit No.
95-39 / Variance No. 95-32 if any violation of these conditions of the Huntington Beach
Ordinance Code occurs.
THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 2:15 P.M. BY THE ZONING
ADMINISTRATOR TO THE NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING OF THE
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR ON WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 17, 1996.
Michael Strange
Zoning Administrator
Ms:MBB:1ek
(g:zamin:0110) _
NT N10.
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUNTINGTON BEACH
TO: MELANIE FALLON
Community Development Director
FROM: TOM HARMAN
Council Member ,
SUBJECT: Appeal of Coastal Development Permit 95-39 and Variance 95-32
DATE: January 18, 1996
I respectfully request the appeal of the Zoning Administrator's decision approving Coastal
Development Permit 95-39 and Variance 95-32, which included a request by the Orange County
Santitation District for the construction of a 98 foot hydraulic surge tower and a 3,200 square
foot pump station located at Wastewater Treatment Plant No. 2 at 22212 Brookhurst Avenue.
This decision is being appealed due to the negative visual impacts of these facilities when viewed
from Pacific Coast Highway.
TH/cj
cc Michael Uberuaga; City Administrator
Ray Silver, Assistant City Administrator
Connie Brockwav, City Clerk
c
as
JAN 1 9 1996
M6 COUNTY or,NITATION DISTRICTS OF ORA1,0E COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
JAN 2
January 23, 1996
phone:
(7141962-2411 Kathy Johnson
City of Huntington Beach
mailing address:P.O.Box 8127 Community P P Development Department
-ountain'Valley, CA 2000 Main Street
92728-8127
Huntington Beach CA 92648
street address:
J844 Ellis Avenue
ountain Valley. CA Subject: Notice of Appeal
92708-7018
Coastal Development Permit
No. 95-39/variance No. 95-32
Member Re: Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution
Agencies System Modifications at Plant No.2, Job No. P2-46
Cities
Anaheim The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) hereby appeal
Brea the followingtwo conditions of our Coastal Development Permit for the
Buena Park P
Cypress construction o oour Job No. P2-46:
.Fountain Valley
Fullerton
untington Beach Item 7.c. "The project shall be served by a minimum of two (2) water service
Irvine
La Habra connections from the sixteen-inch water main in Brookhurst Street. A sixteen-
:: _ La Palma Alamitos inch valve in the mainline shall be constructed between the two connections.
1os
Oj�grt Beach These service connections shall not be joined together on the `public"side of
. _ Orange
centia the meter."
,.4anta Ana
_lea/Beach
.Stanton Justification: The required arrangement does not provide a significant
Tustin increase in reliabilitybut does detract further from the existing landscape with
�__-Vlla Park 9 P
;:�Yorba Linda a second exposed pipe. We would prefer a single connection between two
)un'of,Orange new valves on the main. That would provide the same ability to serve from
either direction on the main.
initary=Districts
r;•..
}.Z c_ Mesa Item 7.g. "Should reclaimed water be used to irrigate on-site landscaping,.
Garden Grove such water shall be purchased from the City of Huntington Beach."
Midway City
wei8r Districts Justification: CSDOC has an existing 14-inch reclaimed water service from
: �rvina Ranch the Orange County Water District's Green Acre Project which utilizes
primarily CSDOC secondary effluent as the water source. We are the largest
--- user of Green Acres Project Water and the success of that program depends
our continued demand. It would be unreasonable to require a second
',T"I f NT �0. Cv
1L,t 1r�I�.::l
4 Public Wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Committed to Protecting the Environment Since 1954
1 1
1
Kathy Johnson
Page 2
January 23, 1996
reclaimed water source for irrigation at the site. There is no irrigation or
landscape work on this project.
Additional justification can be provided as needed. Please let
Wendy Sevenandt, at (714) 962-24 1 1, Extension 5058, know if you need
further information or action to pursue this appeai.
David A. Ludwin, P. E.
Director of Engineering
DAL:PAM:jf
JAWPD0C\ENG\BCHWA7ER
Fax: (714) 374-1540
►� in�,� " 'ENT NO. b- Z
COUNTY aNITATION DISTRICTS OF OF JGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
A
March 12, 1996
it
Phone: Jeff Renna
(714)962-2411
City of Huntington Beach
mailing address: 19001 Huntington Street
Po. Box 8127 Post Office Box 190
:ou CA
92 2sali-a 127 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
street address: SUBJECT: Fire Protection, Si na a and Water Distribution System Modifications
7844 plis Avenue 9 9 Y
-oun-,.ain Valley, CA at Plant No. 2
9270e-701a Job No. P2-46
This letter is in response to Coastal Development Permit No. 95-39, Special
Member Conditions of Approval, Item 7.c., which states that:
Agencies
"The project shall be served by a minimum of two (2)water service
Cities connections from the sixteen-inch water main in Brookhurst Street. A-
Anaheim sixteen-inch valve in the mainline shall be constructed between the two
area connections. These service connections shall not be joined together on the
Bue�Pask "public" side of the meter."
rs
Fountain Valley
Fullerton The County Sanitation Districts are proposing an alternative installation which
-4untington Beach
Irvine consists of one water service connection from the sixteen-inch water main in
is Palma Brookhurst Street. A valve would be installed on each side of the "T" in the
Los Alamitos sixteen-inch main line to allow shutdown of the water main on either side of the
Newport Beech service while allowing service to be maintained. The Districts understand that the
Orange
Placentia installation proposed by the permit conditions provide a high level of protection and
-�
Santa Ana assumes the risk of having only one line serving the treatment plant.
Beach
Stanton
Tustin Please direct questions and comments to Wendy Sevenandt at extension 5058.
Vlla Park
Yorbe Linda
:aunty of Orange I�-r►�/�
Davi A. Ludwin
3an'rtary Districts I Director of Engineering
Costa Mesa
Garden Grove sl
Midway City eng\P246\d1031296.11
Water Districts
c: Mary Beth Broeren
Irvine Ranch Deborah DeBow
ATTACHMENT NO.
A Public Wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Committed to Protecting the Environment Since 1954
Post-it'Fax Not, 7671 Date I)9 I 1(_ pe°gee
From
To `/ h-M1�`1 _ .4 e�5o r+l ,ort �.r.
January 8, 1996 Co./Dept. Co.
ut3 nla...,�•,
Phone 4 Phone A
Fax u Fax e
Mr. Mike Strange, zoning Administrator
Ms. Kathy Johnson, Project Planner
Huntington Beach Community Development
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
RE: CDP #95-39
Dear Mr. Sir/Madam:
It has come to my attention that the OC Sanitation District plans to increase the height of one
of its towers to 98 feet. Although the District serves the population of Orange County in a
very important way, such an increase in project height is simply net acceptable and contrary
to goals and policies to improve the visual character of our City.
Although Huntington Beach benefits from a unique coastal location, it suffers from a certain
visual ugliness in many ways. As the Draft General Plan even points out, the City has some
"visual elements which confuse, diffuse, and weaken the community's identity".
The OC Sanitation Plant is one of the more prominent visual liabilities in our City. Prominantly
located on Pacific Coast Highway, the facility is the first thing one sees when approaching
from Newport Beach. Have you ever travelled north, crossed the PCH bridge at the Santa Ana
River, and been greeted by the OC Sanitation Plant. It is not an appealing sight in the dayu
or night - sort of like driving through Carson or Torrance on the 405 freeway - definitely the
other side of the tracks compared to the City's more affluent neighbor to the south.
As a homeowner near the project, it is unsettling to think that the plant is going to get higher,
and particularly disturbing that they dare to propose an increase to 98 feet on a parcel with
a height zoning restriction of 50 feet.
My neighbors in this part of town care about Huntington Beach and feel this type of request
represents another threat to the City's visual image and quality of life. It is a slap in the face
of the hard work that Citizens and your own planning staff have put into creating a new
General Plan that addresses the need to improve the City's entry nodes/visual corridors.
Please deny the OC Sanitation District's request. We do not need more ugliness added to our
City.
Sincerely,
Jon D. Ely
22051 Hula Circle
Huntington Beach, CA 92646
(714) 964-8586 home
(714) 622-6003 work
ATTE ANENT �0. 10
** TOTAL PAGE.Ell )'*
March 28, 1996 John L.Warde
V, ,
p
P 9682 Melinda Circle
X
HB Planning Commission 0 . L5
Huntington Beach,CA 92646
attn: Mary Beth Broeran MAR 291996 714-962-1443
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA. 92648
Re: Coastal Development Permit#95-3)9
Variance #95-32
Dear Commissioner Mary Beth Broeran:
My name is John Warde and I reside only one block from the Brookhurst Sanitation Plant
located near PCH in our"beautiful community". For over 20 years I have watched this
site develop and continue to expand. For the most part, it has been for the positive as far
as improved processing tanks, etc. However, there has always been one piece of the
puzzle missing, as far as-I am concerned. That piece is the landscaping along the be'ach
side of the plant. A lot of building and improvements have been addressed over the
years, but that one ingredient missing has always left that plant an"eye-sore" to the
community.
I am not in favor of any more building on the site that would make it even more visible
than it is currently, without the addition of a landscape plan to their request for variance.
As a Realtor in the area, I hear the many comments on the unsightly appearance of the
plant and the hesitation of some to not want to be near such a gruesome sight. Property
values are at stake here also. As the plant becomes larger and more visible, the property
values will take a downward slope and become harder and harder to sell. Therefore it is
absolutely mandatory to address the appearance of such a site right now, before the
damage takes place. I'm sure you would agree that pro-active management is far better
than reactive management. Being ahead of a problem is far more advantageous than
trying to catch up and solve the problem later. The small cost of implementing a
landscape plan would definitely benefit the aesthetics of the cities southern most
entrypoint.
I therefore ask you to DENY the Sanitation District request for a variance and demand
that they be required to implement a substantial landscaping plan along the PCH side of
the plant before continuing any further.
jnRcely V
Warde
ATTACHMENT NO. � L_
ADDENDUM ITEM B-1
REVISED CONDITION OF APPROVAL
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 95-39/
VARIANCE NO. 95-32
2. The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County shall work with the Department of Public Works
to augment and modify the landscape plans dated February 15, 1996. The Department of Public
Works shall submit suggested modifications to Drawings No. 1,101 and L102 within 30 days of this
approval. The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County and the City of Huntington Beach
shall work cooperatively in an effort to improve the visual appearance of the plant as viewed from
Pacific Coast Highway. The Landscape Plans shall also include the following:
a. Additional landscaping between the proposed pump station and the blockwall along.Brookhurst
Street. The plant material shall be of sufficient height at maturity to.effectively screen the
portion of the proposed pump station that will extend above the existing blockwall and shall be
installed within the one month of completion of the pump station.
b. A phasing plan identifying timing for landscape improvements to be completed over the next
two years. (PW)
3. The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County shall include an urban design element in the
Phase II strategic plan. The strategic plan shall be prepared by the applicant with active
participation from the City of Huntington Beach Public Works staff to develop a mutually
acceptable urban design element of a strategic plan. The urban design element shall address, but
not be limited to, the following items:
a. Landscaping
b. Murals
c. Interim Land Uses
d. Facility Siting
e. Community Education
f. Architectural Features
5.e. The project shall be served by a minimum of one (1) water service connection from the sixteen inch
water main in Brookhurst Street. The service connection shall not be joined together on the
"public" side of the meter. (PW)
Attachment-4/9/96 (PCSR188-13)
1996
22351 Harwich Lane
Huntington Bch , Ca . 92646
HB Planning Commission
c/o Mary Beth Broeran , Planner
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach , Ca . 92648
re : Coastal Development Permit #95-39
Variance #95-32
Dear Ms . Broeran :
It has come to our attention that in January of this year ,
the City Zoning Administrator approved the OC Sanitation
District ' s request to .increase the height of its surge
towers to 98 feet and to move them closer to PCH than they
are at present . Notice of this request and/or 6ts approval
was not given to the homeowners closest to the project and
no landscape requirements were even considered or approved ,
in violation , we believe , of the requirements set forth in the
General Plan of the City .
These changes cannot enhance our property values and will , we
feel bring further attention to the existence of the Sanitation
facilities just across Brookhurst from our property . The view.
from PCH at present is truly an eyesore and these changes can
only worsen this situation .
With this letter , we are formally requesting your cooperation
to deny the increase in hhe height of the surge towers to 98 feet ,
and would appreciate some .action be taken to require landscaping
along the PCH perimiter of the Sanitation Plant resembling that
which appears along Brookhurst.
Sincerely,
BERNICE & WILLIAM MALKIN
Mr.Jon D. Ely
22051 Hula Circle
Huntington Beach, CA 92646
7141622-6003(W) 7141964-8586(H) <>
April 7, 1995 0�1
9
9F
Mr. Bob Biddle, Chairman
HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
RE: OC Sanitation District Request for Coastal Development Permit #95-39 and
Variance #95-32 (Appeal).
Dear Mr. Biddle:
In January,.the City's Zoning.Administrator gave approval to the OC Sanitation District's
(OCSD) request for a Coastal Development Permit and Variance to increase the height of
their surge tower to 98 feet and move such facilities closer to Pacific Coast Highway.
Although the action recognized the importance of the sewage plant's function, absolutely
no consideration was given to the visual ugliness that continues to be imposed on the
southern gateway to our City by such uses. The OCSD sewage facility is the welcoming
sign for visitors, tourists, residents or potential homebuyers as they enter our City from
Newport Beach.
The approval represented a blatant disregard for the stated goals and policies put forth in
the City's General Plan. Specifically, the approval of the subject permit/variance to
increase the height and move a tower closer to PCH violated the following provisions of the
City's Coastal and Scenic Highways Elements of the General Plan.-
Coastal Element Scenic Highways Element
3.6.2.3 Visual resources 3.2.3.2 Land Use & Development
3.6.2.3 1. a 3.2.3.3 Landscape Corridors
3.6.2.3 1. a (3)
3.6.2.3 1. a (4)
3.6.2.3 2 Improve visually degraded areas
3.6.2.3 2. a
All Orange County residents use our City's proximity to the ocean in one way or another,
whether its the beach, Edison's generation of electricity or OCSD's sewage disposal.
Unlike the beachgoers who pay for parking and sales tax with purchases, the utilities have
been allowed to expand their ugly operations without any concern for the City's image.
FIB Planning Commiss._n
Page 2
The excuse for the variance that Orange County's population is growing and needs to be
accomodated with a higher tower, closer to PCH, is no reason to abandon sensible and
forward-thinking planning policies.
The OCSD is capable of mitigating the ugliness at its facility. The District has $1 million
sitting in a "Site and Security Landscaping Program" budget that has been earmarked for
landscaping but not spent. If they have $300 million to try to buy the County's landfills, they
certainly can spend what has already been planned and budgeted since 1986 and maybe
more.
Conditions of Approval Comments and Recommendations
Condition#2: Unlike when other developments by builders are conditionally
approved in this City, Condition #2 is vague and only requires that
the "applicant work with the Department of public Works to
augment landscape plans dated 2/15/96....within 3 months of this
approval". The revised plans would then only "be submitted to the
Planning Commission for information".
The landscape plans submitted to Planning dated 2/15/96 by the
applicant are clearly not sufficient (the use of 1 to 5 gallon plants in
a scarce manner).
Recommendation #2: Plans for any future mitigation plan should be approved by the
Planning Commission prior to final approval of this request, not
presented as information" at some amiguous future time. This
should not present a hardship or significant delay since, according
to the Staff Report, OCSD has already prepared an unimplented
landscape plan in 1986 (Attachments 7.2 and 7.5) and has had
discussions with HB landscape/tree staff.
Condition#2b: This condition allows the applicant "A phasing plan identifying timing
for landscape improvements to be completed over the next two
years".
Recommendation #2b: Wording should be changed to "....to be completed in conjunction
with construction of the proposed surge tower or over a maximum
of two years" That would be more specific. Such wording would
be similar to other entitlement conditions for other
applicants/developers in this Clty.
Condition#3: The. applicant would only be required to "include the City of
Huntington Beach as a Team Member in a facilities master plan":
HB Planning Commiss,_,i
Page 3
Such a master plan will only "examine ways in which to improve the
aesthetics of the project site, including landscaping and muraling".
Recommendation #3: According to the Staff Report and Attachments 7.2 and 7.5, a Site
and Security Landscape Masterplan has been on the books since
1986. The OCSD should update this plan with the guidance of HB's
Staff, and present such an updated, detailed version of the plan for
approval by the Planning Commision in a timely fashion. Such a
plan including substantial visual mitigation .of the Pacific Coast_
Highway side of the sewage facility should be repuired and
approved before the Permit/Variance is allowed. Examine ways"is
not sufficient and I guarantee that such would only create a myriad
of issues and meetings,. instead of OCSD quickly and efficiently
working to resolve the problem at hand.
If the Planning Commission does not require visual mitigation of these facilities now, as a
requisite for approval, the quality and likelihood of their incorporation at a future date would
be questionable.
Millions of dollars have been spent over the last decade on our Downtown, Pier Plaza, The
Waterfront, and other projects in an effort to improve Huntington Beach for business and its
residents. If Orange County's population is growing to the extent that it is necessary to
construct more visually damaging facilities in our City's southern gateway, than it is also
time for the OC Sanitation District to step up and substantially mitigate these impacts.
I urge you to DENY Coastal Development Permit #95-39 and Variance #95-32 with
findings that the Conditions of Approval do not provide adequate assurance that .
OCSD's facility will be visually mitigated in a substantial or timely manner.
Sincerely,
Jon D. Ely
cc: Commissioner Stephen Holden
Commissioner Haydee Tillotson
Commissioner Fred Speaker
Commissioner Gary Gorman
Commissioner Tom Livengood
Commissioner Ed Kerins
Mary Beth Broeren, Planner
DEX
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS WA"MM OF SHEETS
.� 1 ^-t riC11As.sar.VI.
1.--.. carer �.1••l• , O-, ucclall— USA
sr_: ,1 - • i i-i vi+w ApL a+r••ou(c/Ivol.l.lfpl
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
. 1-) Ir.CAI alMu
fLlAL7
rAap
�• /�� - 7 •-1 fAOl11Vl-r-.l'AMf/KS.UW.0 ro rMy -MU 1
•t) OdOUr 1-3 o.-f+�VC+lAs s,gAO.r.Mo r.Af—MU 7
OCEAN OUTFALL RELIABILITY UPGRADES " r-r r.""-"'�'
�\ ,o 1-o Mfl..Tw_M A t
�- ,1 -r 0[lgU+1p.-.fAMf.Yt+d.l MO^[I.0
unmurmTo
m�s
�. » r-fl rr[..^rkn M•cuff)
1995 S„^�^ ,_1 slfuclAla lcln
IF 3-3 IT"Tm
ow"
ii i-i w a ro.p 1o.1 -.whin.-fir i 7+c M o nw
VICINITY MAP JOB No. J-34-1 ,1 7( f, A.«.+�•b. 1 _Y/lV.f,�sIcTo"I'm«,M,
,-6 flaKoftb.1 -sane.Mo+P nM+s
,7 f-t TLK on q.1 -schwa Im o"ll"
r . l . >• s-lo =K sal-a7-7UIff A.•stc+crs
�p 75 5-11 W".o.M. Mo.-KAla No Ircri"
,r 1
-1t ff-[so.rf-T0491AK1Aq MI&S
�•-� 71 s-11 TLK WI[s-,rK[ILAK"""
1• 3-14 WK lims--watAte/7 calf!
7 y »C x M-1 .qK sW b.1 =pvw
•K p� z B W W, TLK[O(p.1 -srcfols Am cuff!
r+l I1400`=� .1 Y_7 r vt oun t-raw ro ftm.
.t T-. TLK fogs fOL 7 f0.-sw K IIPo•
`��. 9y � f�.� U Y-) wK sass.Ioi 7.Io.-Rtlof
AK fq r
` ` • laAW •f is UIIK PMT M.) f«IrlfAroO-MI MO YC7o1
QIC,rI/L
•fSIt,lArtL Q � 8 ) [-1 •7C+KAI LtcloP4,FT
AC V WItlM fir�. s M [-7 •MITI SIRM"- EA 1
t-f rU..f RoTs 310 ITT. (I tx .MO[A)s Z>rf
(-. 1lCloe.IK/I on-1
7 i ss t-fl
q[ �� �_-Y!i�1. "��'•_��- __ �'/[I"J�((��'.����ift1�1 r q�77_ �. .-�.� ``\j�`"�i•ti-.,. / ] )>Mfo.I i--1) llr^ff•lrwt I ^nOtM f
t-t wx 4v UW--c—EL sWWt3
t- F%R wr M u IrnA somut
14 CDafrAW 7CTmaCs-CWs
CMCkFFoCMI:or^at7-
IM-xc+as.w 117wno.sucm
fU),0-4--s sRrtT r.o
o f_i Irk a°—rw.-Ts
��Cp IrW11VW.t ���•��
----N-•� -77?�
LOCATION MAP WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 -«—
vnii-1101�n f. AREA 1 -- +•.•a [Ia Ao f IA.TA uA Awr• F • �����.
ON
--�•— .+-. �.. _�—.._._... Y�•1 SDAO{l TIOII•r11lI1CTIq rAlorlr AIIS / to swr[IonA Ap l '' YAty[ rer M)1•',•;.1L..w-Ay.
�7F:-- - l•r rtrartlAll•YN[S KNA.-wA i _ '• 'mowwr..- i.�. __
•• I. fNADrlr AND AANNr•AArw 1 'y r -
1
� � Ill , _ . ,ti',r� � [.�I� •C ' t�:r b-. r
EHis -It
,
'ti \v' W1[armAno.
nlrcAa,Io. s" j r y1 _Own
_
•'L� - i ` ' � .\. � J y ,. t•.T d ,-, oK.s,,,u...,..R.,.e.11.0.».Mo
•• �•� "' _ ` I.,�o.a�o f��' ���+ /�_� / •e , � f i �, r-. a.wro-.w r..•ayAu 1 �
• 'V�1 ��y"�� jJLJ^ I• �i !r duao ule.rw�anw 1
_ ��� . •111...1 I[eIM[IRA11011 .YIII� � ' � •/�,
,.../Dana _ y K�.���..-�-�.�.,'' y, d. ,• -1_A«�r' ..1, ®� - / �,
ID
r t
f� t ♦ •_ �; :m 7 '� / mom•
91
` ` -_ n.IIA.. f r\• O ° _ .nlu o...,. ' oo.av�.,,r ool..0 m.o
_ a +.o•o.s ..+.a M r
• \ A� �.�• '.'�� n ► w�i n s•nos oa.u.wl.e.�o a�..
�..: .•- arinw� l�Fs a euA.lc
r r .r.o r..ID•a..w.Ia-.-am..o,.�,
WL
'`:1,." � .,y�:•' u,[ y.yry 1 0.,[oI r.wrerAA.+�In,nr
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
A I �•`eefy �' �, t ORAMOR COUNTY.CALIFORNIA
,� v 4_rl' J-3 A•1
4 ,[ OCEAN OUTFALL RELIABILR`/UPGRADES
PICTURE PLOT PLAN
- At r•,�euf
/. •aaal•/ef A•a r I re/so rbrlt IwrA•nt • Ala.V•••Y//Rlw 1•s ww is s/•al•I•IAw a A mwll•I wma mnaa fld AwfwA iwaY•IrA
•wool wwwa.argrH a•vlc K r•Irelo. arr.w•r•Aa f I•O w<4,m•ro Ilan Aw•l 1/A e 1
N •o or u winw.r �.eou�w.a.•u.a w • wwm ran aw..n.e ou.wa+om.wlv. •
r.•I r ' - • sacral rwoa s nv w maw a
• AIrM t Mw6 A rc.•+w rwa+•c r�wA w raAlrw 11. Arw I I r..r°rlw►I.°ISY me K rll.s
as w000 Yrw nll ar.oa/A M A•a rl•l 1wl A A Ifrr w 1a•O ollaq or+A rlal'/+.q�.ar.rsA.M rAl.
Alll•p A M a,IrILH /. eaal Ilp•1/wl w.A.sa frrla•
• .11A!f•/A,/rw•Iwwr rlalac f.A•u1 r • Alert rsRw w•ftI wa w.\woe/rw '
4rlrul..•tw•.I I.-<•]I wM.••.nrq. awe '' H lrM M m+wl•r w M Irl°Ar asa Ira/e.a.wn
_ s.0 aw.a,a r ti Ant Q rmu mr.ranrw,aR woulot om.R..+a
JQ V''�y. • /m1l Awd[rl[uw wo mCfR aw M • aan..•n,w OwY bOarnr far.41 A 0.O IaaAlw
-` \ ) •COI rR • Q' raw M w41wM 11r1•A•R[q w M Or.ml MY
� -` d NIv.yqi , � afdlM N.00 w•/mrplq M,[.O.0./6 R
Oro®Ow IOOI aW.1rR I{IOIO.r{q<
{.Ol M iAY mewlr w lY•,.ypa•C m4a_ —�fW
'.`�-1 1 -` •efM. YR 4f R.�O! M r.ml Y•••A,MRa OIA®
loC A.11.4 A.Y-.O EtP Y•lf.Or•f1•
-\ it Al. Yw � ``_t IpIOiCa fOt IppK rwpl//pl rOa r•aO pull
Q � � bw14 � I• wRaAl l�lm I){..{.It w rlme as.aa+f
•� r/w 4 /Ir•i
e.r w mw•
1
— rora.c y
•f rn tall l/ Aa+ra
[� I.RR^ ..1 ( HIrIRI•AM rnirr A urlf
V.IPr /Hlw •�':�� Paws Illrl Os
f NA
r\ M of
24 iw/—
r
�'-VQ,uw•
a f d V
wwrp�.� 2
• rwsvw _ = f
I/YArr aa: d�dl.ill 1
• ^l,f nP•It
LZ
IA-
,Oo
rar«,.la wa Il f ar �<,i
O I •°rn � AO?R w /lAA
loll u- v�wf• wawa w•aw y f w
_� _I T--„ f • Iranas+ ru.n 'eRo lo 'a.w.�n —°.°° .
vllal � 'a'.er � • •:rlsrs wrnc.rrRa\�', wra oa. 0
N rO6r f1rRA IrrrY1 w N/R II(
- H rIICIAr ra/Is 4p•s.wfu I \INa. O .
�'ir. AYOn'Oo!�I.w.ra.m w awRe rm w va• • �' A �
fP[K Hal N O YO A M f4� O
rC"9Ogra..01['rC1100/f'rIA/rlblsa"w•nr-F11 .
/I
• W 1111Y
.1 ••s Vwt aCAlaa JOMN CAMOLLO i'"" J--34-1 �e
OP-
County Sanitation oRt e.Y•wr. lOCEANg1iFALLTom
REUABIUTYUPGRADES e DialricltfO►ande County DEMOIJTION •arr
STRUCTURES, GRADING, AND PAVING - AREA T
i
g
f.>♦..- 1 I I _ L K N•e l/-bO O K s alyvH S on.Wr '
I.t•_l I I • ffava )'•Is.�.•11M aaO,f/q f/1t YO/•L
.l••1/ \ IOv.4lWm ifl� " V
\ I�YMIfM1.MU.IOI
do
iw�iliil / IIYI lam •A\q • • w-r�y�`"``
- i11I. • I.IM • •[T
, M / `•`
%/I �' ,IIoO Olaf L,1.1 lu"
V..\j/� � 0 IOR) [`71[/7 �O•M 4O.fff4lt ,
•\ I—M lav a•n�1 fly _000
1 f•1 • w
w no
t1 ►3• O.I �.lt �• ,I�
,III IaMr1•I I+) '/ �•
• �� t0 A t ••1111.•• • Ill. t0 1101,a •• ✓✓ V
•� I W •M dJ•� I+� O�
MIDI \ \ -���•�� I ••••• ��`��1��` \\\..✓/////
I 11rU
// �InY 1•n••1� �/ �� /'Wlll•
/i r11.1•.� � /\ /J \ �f
IOPI; 7
o -
.I acs T acws ti ''"F JOHN CAMOLLO county SanitationJ-34—f
I+�ww�a. lNOIN!!NS BAN OUTFAl1 RWA6KUTY IiPCRAOES
o•+ t D•ulricta Y-6
wr aemiie%a. :,• ? of Orange County Two •a,.•
IOt IMt w Ala.°":•: — GRADING AND PAVING — AREA 2
• I•• u.n-.o. .,r era•.au r• Il s f[
...ay.�.•aa..rw Iiv+i•�o�a i ivwi+ieri.liriri�ao'�w'. .�+..i
J
1
—,afru
•r w-
0 I / w� - --_
/ M l..r !r• �••l
I 1
aFl:it M+
I
vI.wa
r..va as i
.u.�.e
�o�O'°o..�� q�N
. "IV ulew s.
s I m„c ('6F'IIA
m
• II
a
s
..r
I '
^_l AI11.....I
„$.r:m-r
1
ww a.s. i� +..a.n.■us. 1
RTOWfR N0. 1 — WEST ELEVATION
JOHN CAROLLO �""• Counl Sanitationr�r..s w •' I•` ENO1N!!no T OCEAN DUVALL REUABl1TY UPGRADES �
Districb
County Orange
of d 1 SURGE TOWER NO. 1-LU
ARCMTECTURAL PLANS & CLEVAMON ,r I., J
!l.Ir4 IQY IM. C.fl•®a.1r w ..
l S M H.O�•f■■Aal
■ r.nnr V. M es.a r
. ■a■wia r.ea
_•a.R r.O■�N
.✓+wn
C—�—_---_ -------�—� MIS
n T-F-,--I--,-r-nr� --- --- ��
ww Mir
1 � ` s s ua■Y. ■�' .
ti
I
uI - -�——•—e.n.w n..
s s us■a. //� I \\\ eawr
i s.mo■w I _...f 11Y �ccxr-ml*zlr /% ii i i f-r �\\\ �••�
nl .
1 \ n
... I I .�•.. .,o,�,.. >a
AIRCE Tp= NO, 2 — 92 ELEVATION
� � �r Ls ��`� �� JOMN CAROLLO Counl 3•nllalloo } 1
n■ ►+*-�•. tNO1N!!/1• Coup y OCEAN OUVALL REUAOl1TY WMACESDistr
•ter �� t _... � of Orange Count ram"`"•` W
3-3
fi0 Mat-n 2 °� 1 SURCE TONER N0. 2 .a.
U•I�.•4 ..,,,�..... ARCHITECTURAL PLANS t ELEVATION a.a
CL'3'%rr:i:y7ttiII
CA I Al TYP OF 2 A q j I ZO
TYP: I STA 1+COF-
�� I Ex Mom/43 �/ �\ �: I4
4'-pt-POW i / 1' 51 ' 4 /� HOLE IZ
w
/ F
I / A 1a37.Ola \ IZ
0 `� / ; / /It / STA 1+OO.CO TE£�T �� O " I I O
OF 2 M I�
0 015 \\ P TYP \ \ 10
I c�/ SUR E' S10 I \ s10NAL
PULL BOX i \�N
{!
SW AL
�ONbUIT \\\J V \ 12'-01-POTW \I N
{SA t+ \� \ l(D/ 16,-DI-0
/ t1 /ABAN ON 4 1/Cii' 8•_VCP_•J \� �G-�/ I�
C_F/4 c \\ I0
ITY WATLK \ , - / te--VCP-\0 /\F ` 1 1Mj
PUMP
STATION 0t5 ^ \ BY OTHER
/STAG + 4.1
4 v ?�� PROFILE H
9• - 4 '
C-r v�"
\F B / t 015
STO 1p'-OI-POTW ` 1
/4' 0 ANO ,1 �
4D O / CONNECTION � M +
�p50
g OP2\55 / ^\ ^ i /�/\�t \ TYP OC \�(
IF
p•( // // ��\ BY JOB No. 122-35-3
/ A \STA 2+73.15 —% i /`12 KV OISTR:B.1'TION
::; CENTER \\
EXIST 12k \ \
\H FACILITY/
TRANSFORA,£R \\
/ BY bTHERS J
/ 1 E-01-Cw JOB P2-55
3 .� c•
PROFILEe v J08 N0. P2-35_3
SIGNAL PULL BOX
Y A R D P I P I N G P L A NZarl
ee—
_ �R�W �Nc, R�DvGED
PARTIAL
2C-1
a 0
s.e.x•
&IL%r
4
_ S.!
S.s.x
r r-POTw `
CITY WA
PLW STATIOh '� T 10, C
407' i
ST - Er /
SKETCH NO. 5K-1-
ADDEN'DUM NO. Z
J00 NO. PZ - 35 -3
C:v;-trl3�t'1.T %rn
k r
•ll,ll 1 l C,
_ .......... Central
reneraU011
rcy
Faci
lit
six 81
oft
let_ let, ,AU
ZT-
Parking H l tlt�lltfrl�
1r l cc.
�4unnt111 11 L l Iona IIA� +n r :�♦.; � ,�;• /�.`♦
J L;JJ:
�� - �J 11111lt11tl111 U11l Il111�,'��� ��� /♦„• .
Tt�s l♦l�Il �lljy111/19ri�i111 u 1
�4� ♦OetEa 40 ..-t it iN ra7tilrt[ rrti1�1Y�1trxYiYrrrr� J /
♦ �� a *t~3 / \f r 7
p ---Vgir�.rirxl S,j�,@)co l�tl ♦♦,,+ b .�,�` •9y' ��r� l
l_1 ..-.. .......... Of l ices s ., I
�. yi „ _._ —�(�_3 `I!%a`�� i / ♦♦` COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Id .�� CC` /♦` ORANGE COUNTY
-�• � ...�...�.. _.. ���%u��:; �e•.\ r r—�•,,,lr/�,♦ P 1 e n t No. 2
rot a - .^^'^ rF+r+ !�' Trt-e!ment
"1 SuJporl Faeilllfes and
L{ndSCaPe.Master Plan Figure II-"
:I-�I