The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPublic Hearing - Coastal Development Permit No 97-31 (CDP) - April 2, 1998 Dear City Council: I am sending you this fax because I will be unable to attend the City Council Meeting on Monday, April 6 and would like to have Wiry opinion be made aware of concerning the proposed traffic signal at Edwards and Talbert. I am very much opposed to this signal as it is,in my opinion, an unnecessary expenditure that will increase the danger at that intersection. Talbert Street is at the bottom of Edwards hill,and anyone driving down Edwards hill will realize that to put a traffic signal at the bottom.is a ridiculous proposal. Cars will be racing both up and down the hill to avoid stopping at the signal and this will create a potential for accidents. Additionally, cars trying to make sudden stops going down the hill will be at risk of being rear-ended. There is no signal at the intersection now and traffic moves very smoothly. I understand that the grade on Edwards hill will be lowered slightly,but Edwards will still be a significant hill with the risks inherent that I described above. Why does the traffic control at the intersection have to change? As I understand it,the intersection now has a very low or almost non-existent accident rate. Installing a signal here will only increase risk! Please do not proceed with this proposed traffic signal. Thank you, Mrs. Smith cc -, Y CD-� Q7 Cn .--,rnm �OC3 O � D - Y 1 2 : 4 M :u HUNTING T ON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT 20451 Craimer Lane - P.O. Box 71 Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 964-8888 0- March 18, 1998 R E C E V E D BOARD OF TRUSTEES I DEPT,OF P1-16LIC WORKS Shirley Carey �c,President MAR 2 5.1998 \Xv Robert Mann,Ed.D. �\ Clerk 1 1"'�UNTINGTON Mr. Daryl Smith Actin Director BEACH, CA Brian Garland � � g Member Public Works Department Catherine McGough City of Huntington Beach Member 2000 Main Street Brian E.Rechsteiner Member Huntington Beach CA 92648 ADMINISTRATION RE: Proposed Stoplight at Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue Duane Dishno,Ed.D. Superintendent Jerry Buchanan Dear Daryl: Assistant Superintendent Administrative Services I want to bring to your attention the impact that a stoplight at Edwards and Talbert Kathy Kessler Assistant Superintendent will have on the Huntington Beach City School District. The District currently runs Personnel Services eight bus trips into the Bolsa Landmark area each day. Four trips in the morning and John Conniff four trips in the afternoon. Director Administrative Services Gary Rutherford,Ed.D. The buses currently exit via Varsity and then go right on Edwards in order to get a Director run at Edwards Hill. If the buses are forced to stop at Talbert prior to heading up the Curriculum and Instruction hill, they will not be able to get out of first gear and will be forced to proceed up the hill at two miles per hour. This low speed will be a severe hindrance to traffic. Please consider the impact on District bus schedules and the impact on traffic prior to the installation of a stoplight at this intersection. Please call me at 964-8888 if you have any questions or would like a demo ride on a bus up the hill. Sincerely, c3 o---i� Jerry Buchanan m c�m< Assistant Superintendent D Administrative Services �� z w c'. :n > Cc: Dr. Duane Dishno, Superintendent Mr. John Conniff, Director of Administrative Services Mrs. Dorothy Phillips, Supervisor of Transportation "We Are An Equal Opportunity Employer" Council/Agency Meetinw-ld: !�Zcozu 0•�d Def ed/Continued to; W/7N C644/77 ao Approved El Conditionally Ap rove T ❑ Denied °u7Y i Clerk's Signature Council Meeting Date: April 6, 1998 Department ID Number: PW 98-031 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH s REQUEST FOR ACTION SUBMITTED TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBE S ," o�`� c: J rn SUBMITTED BY: RAY SILVER, Acting City AdministratorX,?-� D M-nmQ n� c) PREPARED BY: f�7ARYL D. SMITH, Acting Director of Public Works r r, MELANIE FALLON, Director of Community Development �. SUBJECT: REVIEW OF PUBLIC WORKS.COMMISSION DECISION ON EDWARDS ST. IMPROVEMENTS AND REQUEST FOR APPROVALS OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 97-25 AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 97-31 Statement of Issue,Funding Source,Recommended Action,Alternative Action(s),Analysis,Environmental Status,Attachment(s)Ir Statement of Issue: Plans are currently being prepared by PLC Land Company to widen Edwards Street from Ellis Avenue to Inlet Drive, from a two lane roadway to a four lane roadway. Included in the plans are street improvements for Talbert Avenue from Edwards Street to Fieldbury Lane. At the February 18, 1998, Public Works Commission meeting, the Commissioners recommended, 7-0, inclusion in the Edwards Street Improvement project, the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue. This action has been requested from several of the residents near the project, to be reviewed by the City Council. Additionally, a Coastal Development Permit and the Negative Declaration are required for the project and are included in the recommended action. Staff recommends`that the City Council uphold the Public Works Commission's decision and approve Coastal Development Permit No. 97-31 and Negative Declaration No. 97-25. Funding Source: The roadway widening and construction improvements are being funded via the Traffic Impact Fee program. PLC Land Company is designing and constructing these improvements in accordance with their obligation under the Holly Seacliff Development Agreement. Traffic impact fees collected from Holly Seacliff Specific Plan development will be used to pay for these street improvements. Recommended Action: PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Motion to: 1. Uphold the February 18, 1998, Public Works Commission support of a traffic signal at Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue; and i REQUEST FOR ACTI011 MEETING DATE: April 6, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PW 98-031 2. Approve Negative Declaration No. 97-25 (Attachment No. 4) with findings and mitigation measures (Attachment No. 2); and 3. Approve Coastal Development Permit No. 97-31 with findings and conditions of approval (Attachment No. 2) PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION ACTION ON FEBRUARY 18, 1998: The motion made by Commissioner Hartge, seconded by Vice-Chair Riffenburgh to proceed with the project as proposed and to include in the widening of Edwards Street, the installation of a full traffic signal at Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue; include a crosswalk across Edwards at the signal; a flashing beacon on Edwards Street north of Ellis Avenue, at the top of the hill; remove the existing crosswalk at Inlet Drive; install hard wire to over- ride signal, (Opticom); and install detector loops for Talbert Avenue for vehicle detection. Commissioner Gartland amended the motion to include pedestrian buttons at the traffic signal. The motion was approved 7-0. Alternative Action(s): 1. Approve Negative Declaration No. 97-25 and Coastal Development Permit No. 97- 31 with findings, mitigation measures and conditions of approval and require the removal of left turns from eastbound Talbert Avenue to northbound Edwards Street in lieu of a traffic signal at Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue. 2. Continue the Review of the Public Works Commission decision and Coastal Development Permit No. 97-31 and Negative Declaration No. 97-25 and direct staff accordingly. Analysis: A. PROJECT PROPOSAL Location: Edwards Street (segment north of Ellis Avenue and south of Inlet Drive, including intersection of Talbert Avenue and Edwards Street) and Talbert Avenue (segment from Edwards Street to Fieldbury Lane) Coastal Development Permit No. 97-31 represents a request to widen Edwards Street between Ellis Avenue and Inlet Drive to its ultimate width per the General Plan Circulation Element and reduce the south side of Talbert Avenue between Edwards Street and Fieldbury Lane. Proposed street improvements in conjunction with Edwards Street construction includes widening the existing street area from its current two lane, 40 feet configuration, to four lanes with a width of 80 feet. The existing grade of Edwards Street will be reduced from approximately 12 percent to a maximum grade of 8.8 percent in order to create a safer driving condition. Improvements include new curbs, gutters and sidewalks along Edwards Street and at the corner of Talbert Avenue and Edwards Street; at grade 0030589.02 -2- 03/25/98 8:24 AM REQUEST FOR ACTIOP MEETING DATE: April 6, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PW 98-031 north and southbound bike lanes; a one foot raised, landscaped median island; new street lighting; drainage improvements; the relocation of existing 66kV electrical lines; the undergrounding of existing above ground 12kV electrical lines and the relocation of an existing underground Southern California Edison fuel line. At the intersection of Edwards Street and Ellis Avenue, a traffic signal will be constructed. Also, a 36 inch diameter pipe will be installed below grade as a drainage facility across Edwards Street south of Talbert Avenue. This pipe will also serve as a future wildlife corridor at some point in the future, if the private land to the west of the project is reverted to public land. Proposed street improvements in conjunction with Talbert Avenue construction include transitioning the south side of Talbert Avenue from an 80 foot right-of-way to a total curb to curb width of 40 feet, curb, gutter and sidewalk. At the intersection of Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue, the Public Works Commission and staff recommend the construction of a full traffic signal. This would also require the installation of a flashing beacon for northbound vehicles on Edwards Street, north of Ellis Avenue. B. PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION MEETINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Staff held a public meeting at the January 21, 1998, Public Works Commission meeting to consider subject project. At the meeting, staff'recommended the removal of left turns from eastbound Talbert Avenue to northbound Edwards Street, due to unsafe turning and sight distance issues, and the low volume of vehicles making left turns. Approximately seventy people attended and twelve people provided public comments opposing staff s recommendation. No one spoke in favor of staffs recommendation. The Commission continued the item and directed staff to evaluate the possibility of maintaining the left turns from eastbound Talbert Avenue to northbound Edwards Street and providing pedestrian access by installing a traffic signal at this location and a flashing beacon on Edwards Street, north of Ellis Avenue. Also, the Commissioners requested staff to look into the feasibility of installing a Wildlife Corridor across Edwards Street in response to Commissioner Smith's request. Staff is proposing to install a dual purpose reinforced concrete pipe, (36 inches in diameter), for storm drainage and for the wildlife corridor. Because the City does not have any jurisdiction over the property on the west side of Edwards Street, (privately owned by the Koll Company), staff is recommending to install a grate on the pipe on the west side and to close off the east end of the pipe until the land on the west side of the project becomes public. A second public meeting was held at the February 18, 1998, Public Works Commission meeting. Staff reported that it would be feasible to install a traffic signal at the intersection of Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue. Five people provided public comments opposing the installation of a traffic signal at Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue and recommending the elimination of left turns from eastbound Talbert Avenue to northbound Edwards Street. Six people provided public comments in favor of the installation of the traffic signal as staff had 0030589.02 -3- 03/25/98 8:24 AM 10 REQUEST FOR ACTIOV MEETING DATE: April 6, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER:PW 98-031 recommended. The Commission unanimously directed staff to proceed with the Edwards Street improvement project with the installation of the full traffic signal and flashing beacon. There were no comments in favor of staffs recommendation regarding the initial design proposed at the January 21, 1998, Public Works Commission meeting. C. REVIEW OF PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION DECISION On March 2, 1998, Bart J. Hollander spoke at the City Council meeting regarding his concerns for the subject project. He was requested to send a letter to the City Council. Staff received his letter dated March 9, 1998, (Attachment No. 3). Mr. Hollander is requesting the City Council to review the Public Works Commission decision to install the traffic signal at Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue. He would like to see the Public Works Commissioners recommendation be changed to eliminate the traffic signal at Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue and to eliminate the eastbound Talbert Avenue to northbound Edwards Street vehicular movement. D. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION Traffic Signal Alternative Staff conducted a thorough investigation as directed on January 21, 1998, by the Public Works Commissioners. Turning movement counts were taken at the intersections of Edwards Street / Talbert Avenue, Edwards Street / Inlet Drive, and Edwards Street / Varisity Drive/Central Park Drive, (Attachment No. 5). A traffic signal warrant analysis was conducted for the intersection of Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue. That analysis demonstrated that the intersection of Edwards Street at Talbert Avenue, (keeping eastbound Talbert Avenue to northbound Edwards Street left turns), met the traffic signal warrants and a traffic signal should be considered. Installing a traffic signal at the intersection. of Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue will allow pedestrians to cross Edwards Street to Central Park with a protected movement. To assure emergency response, the traffic signal at Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue, the flashing beacon at the top of the hill for northbound vehicles on Edwards Street and the traffic signal at Edwards Street and Ellis Avenue will be tied together to the proposed fire station on Edwards Street approximately 300 feet south of Ellis Avenue. When a fire unit responds to an emergency from the fire station, the traffic signals will provide a green indication for northbound Edwards Street at Ellis Avenue and at Talbert Avenue. The flashing beacon will also serve as an advance pre-emption for other units responding to the emergency other than the ones from the fire station. 0030589.02 -4- 03/25/98 8:24 AM REQUEST FOR ACTI09 MEETING DATE: April 6, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PW 98-031 Elimination of Left Turns Alternative Traffic restricted from the left turn movement on Talbert Avenue at Edwards Street, would most likely use Varsity Drive to go north on Edwards Street, using an existing four-way Stop controlled intersection. The intersection of Edwards Street at Varsity Drive/Central Park Drive is on the Traffic Signal Priority List. Project Schedule The project is expected to begin on May 6, 1998 with an estimated completion date of November 24, 1998. The project will be delayed due to the scheduling of the relocation of the Southern California Edison 66kV electrical lines. Only Southern California Edison crews are able to relocate their facilities and they are presently busy with projects located elsewhere in the County. (See PLC Land Development Company letter dated -March 13, ti 1998, Attachment No. 6) Environmental Status: Staff has reviewed the environmental assessment and determined that no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed project that could not be mitigated to a level of insignificance with proper design and engineering. Subsequently, Negative Declaration No. 97-25 (Attachment No. 4) was prepared with mitigation measures pursuant to Section 240.04 of the HBZSO and the provisions of the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA). The Department of Community Development advertised draft Negative Declaration No. 97- 25 for twenty (20) days commencing on March 12, 1998 and ending on March 31, 1998. No comments, either verbal or written have been received, at the time this request for Council action was prepared. Subsequent communications will be supplied to the City Council at the April 6th meeting. Prior to any action on the review of the Public Works Commission's decision of February 18, 1998, and Coastal Development Permit No. 97-31, it is necessary for the City Council to review and act on Negative Declaration No. 97-25. Staff, in its initial study of the project, is recommending that the negative declaration be approved with findings and mitigation measures. 0030589.02 -5- 03/25/98 8:24 AM 159-073-05 159-073-06 159-073-07 Diane K. Mc Clarin Raymond B. Dirling George F. Beaucage 18051 Heathpoint Lane 18061 Heathpoint Lane 18071 Heathpoint Lane Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-073-08 159-073-09 159-073-10 Chester P. Tomsick Gary F. Mc Connell Mark L. Burnett 6282 Glenfox Dr. 6292 Glenfox Dr. 6302 Glenfox Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-073-11 159-073-12 159-073-13 William M. Prats Sallie J. Walker Russell G. Jones 18081 Wellbrook Cir 18091 Wellbrook Cir 18101 Wellbrook Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-073-14 159-074-01 159-074-02 James A. Stringer Charles H. Bunten Stephan P. Rubino 18121 Wellbrook Cir 18132 Wellbrook Cir 18112 Wellbrook Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-074-03 159-074-04 159-074-05 Joseph Paul Donner Roy Miller Ronald J. Zawistowski 18102 . Wellbrook. Cir 18092 Wellbrook Cir 1009 . Daisy Ave. Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Carlsbad CA 92009 159-074-06 159-074-07 159-074-08 James G. Banville James M. Schellenberg Richard Odell 18081 Fieldbury Lane 18091 Fieldbury Lane 18101 Fieldbury Lane Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-074-09 159-074-10 159-074-11 Sacha Marcroft Patrick Chi-Kong Chan Jerome K. Mandich 18111 Fieldbury Lane 18121 Fieldbury Lane 18141 Fieldbury Lane Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-079-01 159-079-02 159-081-01 Signal Companies Inc Signal Companies Inc Michael C. Springman 4343 Von Karman Ave. 4343 Von Karman Ave. 6971 Lawn Haven Dr. Newport Beach CA 92660 Newport Beach CA 92660 Huntington Beach CA 9264$ 159-081-02 1.59-081-03 159-081-04 Kenneth H. Bennett Victoriano Ambata John T. Page 6401 Newbury Dr. 6411 Newbury Dr. 6421 Newbury Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-081-05 159-081-06 159-081-07 John T. Horton John Pulley Kenneth W. Smith 6431 Newbury Dr. 6451 Newbury Dr. '6461 Newbury Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 9264 7 159-081-08 159-081-09 159-081-10 Bruce H. West Robert W. Lillis William W. Howatt 6471 Newbury Dr. 6481 Newbury Dr. 18012 Lakepoint Lane Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-081-11 159-081-12 159-081-13 Mark A. Cummins State Street BK & Tr Albert M. Corbett 18022 Lakepoint Lane 18052 Lakepoint Lane Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-081-14 159-081-15 155-081-16 Michael F. Sherman Peter J. Jakubowski Eric E. Spencer 18062 Lakepoint Lane 18072 Lakepoint Lane 18082 Lakepoint Lane Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-081-17 159-081-18 159-082-01 William F. Payne Terry L. Orosco Dwight L. Andersen 18092 Lakepoint Lane 18102 Lakepoint Lane 18122 Lakepoint Lane Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-082-02 159-082-03 159-082-04 Steven Dana Nicholson James F. Herbold Bart Hollander 18132 Lakepoint Lane 18142 Lakepoint Lane 18152 Lakepoint Lane Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-082-05 159-083-01 159-083-02 Maxwell J. Smith James D. Jones Tim J. Wegner 18162 Lakepoint Lane 6382 Newbury Dr. 6402 Newbury Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 I 159-083-03 159-083-04 159-083-05 Ernest Kocsis Vincent Walker Katherine A. Nichols 6412 Newbury Dr. 6422 Newbury Dr. 6432 Newbury Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-083-06 - 159-083-07 159-083-08 Alfred J. Bilotti David M. Polancic John G. Huber 16357 Wimbledon Lane 6462 Newbury Dr. 2772 Rickenbacker Ct . Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Orefield PA 18069. 159-083-09 159-083-10 159-083-11 Carl O. Staley Manuel Reyes Robert M. Blum 6471 Glenfox Dr. 6461 Glenfox Dr. 6451 Glenfox Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-083-12 159-083-13 159-083-14 William J. Trounce Paul D. Twedt Daniel Perry Becker 6431 Glenfox Dr. 6421 Glenfox Dr. 6411 Glenfox Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92642 159-083-15 159-083-16 159-084-01 June Coast Properties • Susan L. Harris • Bruce Alan Fischer 18652 Florida St . No. 300 6381 Glenfox Dr. 18081 Lakepoint Lane Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-084-02 159-084-03 159-084-04 Mary C. Fleury Anthony Yturralde Velda L. King P.O. Box 1312 5196 California Ave. 18111 Lakepoint Lane Huntington Beach CA 92647 Norco CA 91760 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-084-05 159-084-06 159-084-07 Benjamin Benson Bernard Bendow Richard M. Garay 18121 Lakepoint Lane 18131 Lakepoint Lane 18141 Lakepoint Lane Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 9264� 159-084-08 159-084-09 159-084-10 Dixie L. Long Alan J. Reid Charles M. Lanning 18151 Lakepoint Lane 18161 Lakepoint Lane 18152 Brentwell Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-084-11 159-084-12 159-084-13 Russ Kalander Moon Fai Siu David W. Ellis 18142 Brentwell Cir 18132 Brentwell Cir 16862 Sea Wi-tch Lane Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92641 159-084-14 159-084-15 159-084-16 William B. Smallshaw Robert Harrison Beam Bonnie G. Ainsworth 18112 Brentwell Cir 18102 Brentwell Cir 18092 Brentwell Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-084-17 159-085-01 159-085-02 Don W. Griffiths James P. Ruziecki Bertil V. Bystrom 18082 Brentwell Cir 18081 Brentwell Cir 18091 Brentwell Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-085-03 159-085-04 159-085-05 David Richard Mears June Coast Properties Brian A. White 18101 Brentwell Cir 18652 Florida St. No. 300 18121 Brentwell Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-085-06 159-0851 07 159-085-08 Val J. Benincosa Richard A. Buccola Steve A. O'Keefe 18131 Brentwell Cir 18141 Brentwell Cir 18151 Brentwell Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-085-09 159-085-10 159-085-11 Hong Cheol Kim _ Jack D. Maley Brian Thomas Fronk 18191 Fieldbury Lane 18132 Fieldbury Lane 18122 Fieldbury Lane Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 926411 159-085-12 159-085-13 159-085-14 Jerry* Robert Jaso Raymond J. Shaw Charles Robert Poe 18112 Fieldbury Lane . 18102 Fieldbury Lane 018092 Fieldbury Lane Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-085-15 159-089-01 159-251-01 William M. Prats Signal Companies Inc Peter J. Sequeira 18081 Wellbrook Circle 4343 Von Karman Ave. 766-0 Calle Aragon Huntington Beach CA 92647 Newport Beach CA 92660 Laguna Hills CA 92653 159-251-02 . 159-251-03 159-251-04 Aurand Trust Beverly J. Hanon John Michael Barrett 18131 Riverside Cir 18141 Riverside Cir 18151 Riverside Cir Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92641, I 159-251-05 159-251-06 159-252-01 Mark R. Johnston Rexford T. Parker Swasdi Pothikanjorn 18161 Riverside Cir 18171 Riverside Cir 9642 Chevy Chase Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 9264 159-252-02 159-252-03 159-252-04 Verna Creciat Michael A. Ivy Philip F. Finston 18152 Riverside Cir 18162 Riverside Cir 18172 Riverside Cir Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 9264 t 159-252-05 aU 159-252-06 159-252-07 Robert J. Schmidl Charles A. Moss Hyo Gap Pang P.O. Box 1559 18192 Riverside Cir 18211 Leaf Cir Sacramento CA 95812 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 9264B 159-252-08 159-252-09 159-252-10 Rudolf Weber Jimmie R. Argott Robert Joe Geraci 18207 Leaf Cir 18201 Leaf Cir 18197 Leaf Cir Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92649 159-252-11 159-252-12 159-252-13 Michael R. Lazear Sergio E. Quintanar Steven L. Hamstrom 18195 Leaf Cir 18191 Leaf Cir 18185 Leaf Cir Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 9264? 159-252-14 159-252-15 159-252-16 Gary E. Altunian Carl R. Zaptiff Russell S. Buccola 18181 Leaf Cir 18182 Leaf Cir 18192 Leaf Cir Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92649 159-252-17 159-252-18 159-252-19 Walter R. Smith Gary Hegenbart Surendra P. Patel 18202 Leaf Cir 18206 Leaf Cir 18212 Leaf Cir Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 9264$ 159-252-20 159-252-21 159-252-22 James Koch Jerry L. Gabel Dina Braendle 6301 Pacemont Dr. 6311 Pacemont Dr. 18261 Fieldbury Lane Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 9264$ 159-252-23 159-252-24 159-252-25 James J. Elser James A. White Charles M. Bell 18251 Fieldbury Lane 18241 Fieldbury Lane 18231 Fieldbury Lane Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92641 159-252-26 159-252-27 159-252-28 Stephen Chaing Pa Liu Gerald L. Jones Hong Cheol Kim 18211 Fieldbury Lane 18201 Fieldbury Lane 18191 Fieldbury Lane Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 159-253-01 159-253-02 159-253-03 Jason Sung Kim William Alan Drummond Richard S . Marchant 6381 Talegate Dr. 6391 Talegate Dr. 6401 Talegate Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 159-253-04 159-254-01 159-254-02 Thomas B. Burket Patrick O. Pierce Alan Hurst 6411 Talegate Dr. 18312 Fieldbury Lane 18302 Fieldbury Lane Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 9264V 159-254-03 159-254-04 159-254-05 Steve Kelepecz Irene E. Guarderas Thomas Greer 18292 Fieldbury Lane 18282 Fieldbury Lane 18272 Fieldbury Lane Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92641 159-254-06 159-254-07 159-254-08 Michael D. Hawkins David R. Scott Robert Michowski 18262 Fieldbury Lane 18252 Fieldbury Lane 18242 Fieldbury Lane Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 9264r 159-254-09 159-254-10 159-254-11 Joseph L. Notrica Jay B. Zaidenberg Daniel J. Mc Donald 6372 Talegate Dr. 6382 Talegate Dr. 6392 Talegate Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 9264Q 159-255-01 159-255-02 159-255-03 Norman L. Mayer Antonio V. Banaag Tan Tan Ngo 6212 Pacemont Dr. 6222 Pacemont Dr: 6232 Pacemont Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 9264'9 159-255-04 159-255-05 159-255-06 - David A. Desataff Darry K. Webb Ronald R. Evans 6252 Pacemont Dr. 6262 Pacemont Dr. 6272 Pacemont Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 9264% 159-255-07 159-255-08 159-255-09 Howard G. Kaufman Jung Hong Kim Heidi De Britton 6756 Sicily Cir 6292 Pacemont Dr. 6302 Pacemont Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92,&iq 159-255-10 159-255-11 159-255-12 Chul Yung Jung Dino L. Amador Theo Rola 18291 Fieldbury Lane Box 1664 Abqaiq 18311 Fieldbury Lane Huntington Beach CA 92648 Saudi Arabia 31311 Huntington Beach CA 924AS 159-255-13 159-255-14 159-255-15 Thomas A. Buksa William E. Palmer Gregory Timothy Berber 6271 Moonfield Dr. 6261 Moonfield Dr. 6251 Moonfield Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92&AS 159-255-16 159-255-17 159-255-18 Mark Bolton Edwin M. Kimoto Gerald A. Wegman 6241 Moonfield Dr. 6231 Moonfield Dr. 6221 Moonfield Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92L4$ 159-255-19 159-255-20 159-259-01 Vaughn S. Elmore Kurt Markshausen Signal Companies Inc 6211 Moonfield Dr. 6201 Moonfield Dr. 17890 Sky Park Cir Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Irvine CA 92614 159-391-09 159-391-10 159-391-11 Edward D. Laurance Theodore G. Lasker Eric Rescigno 6581 Silverspur Lane 6571 Silverspur Lane 6551 Silverspur Lane Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92412 159-391-12 159-391-13 159-391-14 Dennis F. D'Ambra Kevin P. Conlisk Richard L. Amaral 6541 Silverspur Lane 6531 Silverspur Lane 6525 Silverspur Lane Huntington Beach CA 926.48 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 9264a 159-391-36 159-391-53 Ronald Irving Brindle Richard C. Davis 6521 Silverspur Lane 6562 Silverspur Lane Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 159 011 22 159 072 04 159 074 02 Olson, Robert Robert V. Reider Bacon Thomas 18012 Freshwater Cr 5795 Martin Rd. 6771 Corral Cr Huntington Beach, CA 926478 Irwindale CA 91706 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 159 074 08 159 081 01 159 081 12 McLaughling John Michael C. Springman Zell John M 18101 Fieldbury Ln 6974 Lawn haven Dr 18042 Lakepoint Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach,CA 92647 159 084 13 159 255 05 159 255 09 David W. Ellis Gam Michael Hetzler Robert 18123 Brentwell Cr 6262 Pacemont Dr. 6302 Pacemont Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 1- Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beachuc Office of the City ClerkOP.O. Box ,90 �7 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 H METER INS 159-259-01 � 1tp , Signal Companies Inc 17890 Sky Park yr�r1`��l�"✓��/ � , �• s Irvine CA 92614 IRETURN i4 - PUBLIC HEARING c? ��N � j f - c_c:. .:-.._:..:.._::c__--:_._:.t-.-:__._. Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach C T 0 0 Office of the City Clerk • 'p, S' P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA92648 � t4 f 0_U �-IIIL"o t:J i J`c x-'x j4—?.,ice r 159-252-05 ' �0.0 P.O. Box 1559 �INgT w � Sacramento CA 95812 LEGAL NOTICE- PUBLIC HEARING ��aL2 wv-ro II1111111I1i11l1„fill filifis„I,I1I1I111„Iil Connie Brockway,City Clerk ' City of Huntington Beach OVIP216,01 Office of the City Clerk ,P.O. Box 190 '�� ' 03/;V-�98 {:.:Huntington Beach, CA 92648 IKE P.METER S 5 7 NL 1�- 159-255-11 Dino L. Amador,,,' 6�O / � ��j• TiN6T Box 1664 Abgaig Saudi Arabia 31311 LEGAL NOTICE- PUBLIC HEARING Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach �r•�1 0 Ati, , U.S.PG`.' '7 Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 ,, L v r n� H WiETER 5 ' :#.x .4--3..1C, 159 084 13 David W. Ellis jIN6r 18121 Brentwell Cr �I �'"""""�• �� Huntington Beach, CA 92647 �� • ELLI123 926472014 IN 21 03/28/98 t RETURN TO SENDER momaarsssaac�we�zs�• FORWARD ORDE ON FILE R �,_.... RET'Ari u ;�E T%-.F aD T O AL NOTICE- PUBLIC HEARING FWDG OR , EXuI L. :;`=.� ►ai 5'r CITY . OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH DATE: 4/7/98 TO: Scott Hess, Senior Planner FROM: Connie Brockway, City Clerk RE: Legal Notification Process My office continues to be appreciative of the process you have established regarding provision of public hearing property owner notification labels to the Clerk's Office. The last hearing and a few times previously have had the extra page of updated labels with problems that can easily be corrected by your intern. The two attached examples: David Ellis had address updated (although a typo occurred - - however an [ additional] owner(Mark Hoffman) was not included in update. The other example should have had [Robert Schmidt deleted] and Department of Veterans Affairs - State of California inserted. The P. O. Box is correct. The City Clerk's Office would appreciate your intern changing the complete label when updating. Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach ,�,T c•ti , U.S- Office of the City Clerk �`` s� 4 P.O. Box 190 ; ,126 Huntingtor Beach, CA 92648 i " 'a8 ,, U U. _ —�' HMLTck s5'.i, ' 159 084 13 04j0- David W. Ellis � 1�N6t0,r 1812ABrentwell Cr _ Vk,0 �!_'"'"•• �� Huntington Beach, CA 92647 • ELLI123 926472014 IN 21 03/28l9@ t RETURN TO SENDER >/ r. FORW RD ORDE ON FILE R ►t . — R E T'il�i tr u 'e•6 L TO+ Rn F=Q FWac oR F, i=xP�I;r: AL NOTICE- PUBLIC HEARING I } ��-•� '• '-: ?+.�a�0 IIIIIIIIiifllifflifIIIIIIIIJIIIIJI11i 1I11111111111fillIIIIl:II • Connie Brockway,City Clerk 10 A, City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk ri P.O. Box 190 U o'z -J; 'T 0 A"< Huntington Beach,CA 92648 03� 11 ,- M E T E R 159-252-05 fat Robert J. Schmidl P.O. Box 1559 Sacramento CA 95812 'oil �ai N I LEGAL NOTICE- PUBLIC HEARING 11111111 111111111111111111111111121111111 111 fill 1111111 If 11111 f Connie Brockway,City Clerk '• City of Huntington Beach , avT°ti us.P csle,t: Office of the City Clerk P.O. BOX 190 03�c 7�98 SANpTA �ANy"/�,�'+[ Huntington Beach,CA 92648 �� il'E ...... ��-'�'' o.� P METER y� w rz 159-255-11 Dino L. Amadoi/ Box 1664 Abgaiq tINSTQ Saudi Arabia 31311 C�/'^"'/ry��• �`QIINTI �� LEGAL NOTICE- PUBLIC HEARING / CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CONNIE BROCKWAY CITY CLERK April 30, 1998 California Coastal Commission South Coast Area Office 200 Oceangate, 10th Floor Long Beach, California 90801-4302 Subject: Coastal Development Permit No. 97-31 -Appealable Development Applicant: City of Huntington Beach Public Works Department Request: To Widen Edwards Street between Ellis Avenue and Inlet Drive to its ultimate width per the General Plan Circulation Element and reduce the south side of Talbert Avenue between Edwards Street and Fieldbury Lane. Location: Edwards Street (segment north of Ellis Avenue and south of Inlet Drive, including intersection of Talbert and Edwards) and Talbert Avenue (segment from Edwards Street to Fieldbury Lane.) Date Of Approval: April 6, 1998 Enclosed please find certified copies of the minutes of the April 6, 1998 Huntington Beach City Council meeting on the above referenced public hearing. The applicable pages are 15 through 20. Connie Brockway, CIVIC City Clerk Attachments: April 6, 1998 Minutes cc: Mary Beth Broeren - Community Development Department Terri Ross - Department of Public Works jc:cdp97-31.doc.jc (Telephone:714-536-5227) ' • MINUTES • CITY COUNCILIREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 5:00 PM - Room B-8 7:00 PM - Council Chamber Huntington Beach, California Monday, April 6, 1998 An audio tape recording of the 5:00 p.m. portion of this meeting and a video tape recording of the 7:00 p.m. portion of this meeting are on file in the Office of the City Clerk. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Dettloff called the regular meetings of the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach to order at 5:00 p.m. in Room B-8. CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ROLL CALL Present: Harman, Green, Dettloff, Bauer, (Sullivan arrived at 5:10 p.m. and Garofalo arrived at 5:15 p.m.) Absent: Julien PUBLIC COMMENTS REGARDING STUDY SESSION AND CLOSED SESSION AGENDA ITEMS There were no persons present to address Council regarding the study session or closed session items scheduled on the agenda. (CITY COUNCIL) STUDY SESSION - CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH MEMBERSHIP IN PUBLIC CABLE TELEVISION AUTHORITY (PCTA) - FURTHER REPORT TO BE PRESENTED IN 30 DAYS (140.60) Rich Barnard presented a slide report titled Public Cable Television Authority(PCTA) dated April 6,1998. The slide presentation covered the following topics: What is the PCTA? i Page 2 -Council/Agency Minutes -04/06/98 Brief history of the PCTA Composition of the PCTA PCTA Responsibilities PCTA's strengths and weaknesses F ` Proposed modification to the JPA City Council options Councilmember Sullivan, who serves as a Director on the PCTA and Councilmember Bauer, Alternate PCTA Director, reported on issues relative to the workings of the PCTA. ` Councilmember Bauer stated that he believed that the city should withdraw from the PCTA. Mary Morales, Executive Director of the PCTA, presented a report on issues including the PCTA budget, changing technology and interest from the City of Orange to join the PCTA. She spoke regarding how she believes some of the weaknesses in the PCTA can be fixed. Ms. Morales stated that PCTA is planning to recommend that Time Warner rates be lowered and a refund be made to subscribers. She stated that she is sure this recommendation of the PCTA will be appealed to the Federal Communications Commission. Councilmember Garofalo commented on the issues. He stated that he would like to see the city make a proposal to re-write the PCTA Charter to have the vote based on the number of subscribers per city rather than one man - one vote. Councilmember Sullivan recommended that Council and staff submit questions and comments to Ms. Morales for response and that a report be presented to Council as an agenda item in 30 days. MOTION TO RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION -APPROVED (120.80) A motion was made by Green, second Sullivan, to recess the City Council to closed session to consider the following items. The motion carried by unanimous vote with Councilmember Julien recorded absent. Closed Session - City Council pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 to meet with its designated representatives William Osness, Personnel Director, and Daniel Cassidy, Esquire, Liebert, Cassidy and Frierson, regarding labor relations matters - meet and confer with the following employee organizations: Marine SafetyOfficers'Association, Police Officers' Association, Police Management Association, Municipal Employees'Association, Management Employees' Organization, Huntington Beach Firefighters'Association, and Surf City Lifesaving Employees'Association. (120.80) 0 04/06/98 - City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes - Page 3 1 Closed Session - City Council pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) to confer with its attorney regarding pending litigation which has been initiated formally and to which the city is a party. The title of the litigation is Grant v. City of Huntington Beach - Orange County Superior Court Case No. 77 85 30. Subject: Grant v. City of Huntington Beach. Closed Session - City Council pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) to confer with its attorney regarding pending litigation which has been initiated formally and to which the city is a party. The title of the litigation is City of Huntington Beach v. Montgomery Watson - Orange County Superior Court Case No. 76 59 40. Subject: City of Huntington Beach v. Montgomery Watson. Closed Session - City Council pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) to confer with its attorney regarding pending litigation which has been initiated formally and to which the city is a party. The title of the litigation is City of Huntington Beach v. Peterson Law Firm - Orange County Superior Court Case No. 78 24 93. Subject: City of Huntington Beach v. Petersen Law Firm, Closed Session - City Council pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) to confer with its attorney regarding pending litigation which has been initiated formally and to which the city is a party. The title of the litigation is Boles v. City of Huntington Beach -Orange County Superior Court Case No. 67 31 12. Subject: Boles v. City of Huntington Beach. CLOSED SESSION REMOVED FROM AGENDA City Attorney Hutton informed Council that the motion to recess to closed session did not cover the closed session regarding the Spa of Hawaii and that this closed session was removed from the agenda. RECONVENE Mayor Dettloff reconvened the regular meetings of the City Council and Redevelopment Agency in the Council Chamber at 7:06 p.m. The City Attorney reported that there were no actions taken by the City Council or Redevelopment Agency in Closed Session that require a reporting as required by law (Government Code 54957.1 (a) (3) (B)). CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ROLL CALL Present: Harman, Green, Dettloff, Bauer, Sullivan, Garofalo Absent: Julien Page 4 - Council/Agency Minutes - 04/06/98 FLAG CEREMONY AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 'The flag ceremony and Pledge of Allegiance were led by Mayor Pro Tern Green. INVOCATION - Bruce Templeton, First Christian Church, Huntington Beach. CITY CLERK ANNOUNCES LATE COMMUNICATIONS WHICH PERTAIN TO ITEMS ON THE AGENDA Pursuant to the Brown (Open Meetings)Act, City Clerk Brockway announced the following late communications regarding Agenda Items which had been received following distribution of the agenda: Revised Page No. 17 of the April 6, 1998 agenda correcting the Council/Agency Adjournment date from Monday, April 14,1998 to Tuesday, April 14,1998 Study Session Regarding: Public Cable Television Authority (A Slide Report dated April 6,1998 Communication from Community Development Director Fallon dated April 3,1998 transmitting a substitute Draft Letter to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers clarifying the language pertaining to public comment on the Army Corps of Engineers permit Slide Report from Economic Development Director Biggs titled 1997-98 Action Plan Slide show presentation from Councilmember Garofalo dated April 6,1998 regarding Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Five communications expressing opposition to the proposed signal at Talbert and Edwards as follows: Communication from Mrs. Smith dated April 2,1998; Communication from Martin and Denise Menichiello dated April 2,1998; Communication from Mrs. Hollander, dated April 4,1998; Communication from Gordon M. Watson, President of the Country View Estates Homeowners Association dated April 3,1998; a letter from Jerry Buchanan, Assistant Superintendent, Huntington Beach City School District regarding school buses traveling on Edwards Street up the hill to Ellis Avenue. A communication from Acting Public Works Director Smith dated April 3,1998 in response to a letter from Jerry Buchanan, Assistant Superintendent, Huntington Beach City School District regarding school buses traveling on Edwards Street up the hill to Ellis Avenue. The communication listed on Page 8 of the City Council Agenda is from the Acting Public Works Director not the Economic Development Director; Slide show presentation from Community Services Department dated April 3,1998 regarding an overview of the Huntington Beach Parking Fees 04/06/98 - City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes - Page 5 Communication from Mr. Abdelmuti, Abdelmuti Development Company dated April 6,1998 in opposition to a complete closure of 5th Street and the elimination of the parking lot behind his building Communication from Mike Roberts, CR Companies, LLC, dated April 6,1998 in opposition to consideration being given to the closure of 5th Street and to the consideration of an all commercial development on Block 104 and 105 Slide Report from Economic Development Director Biggs Regarding: The Block 104/Block 105 Development Proposals Communication from John H. Tillotson, Jr., Tillotson Enterprises, dated April 6,1998 in opposition to the closure of 5th Street Slide show presentation from the Community Services Department dated April 6,1998 regarding the proposed contract with Schulte Sports Enterprises 95 for naming rights/corporate partnering relative to Pier Plaza PRESENTATIONS OF CERTIFICATES OF COMMENDATION - By Mayor Dettloff and the City Council, of Miss Huntington Beach, Rachael Bowe, Kristin Darnall, First Runner Up, and Jennifer DeBritton, Second Runner Up and presentations of Certificates of Commendation. Attending with Miss Huntington Beach and her Court is Mrs. Jackie Judd, Executive Director, Miss Huntington Beach Scholarship Pageant. (160.40) PRESENTATION - By Mayor Dettloff and the City Council to David Biggs, Economic Development Director, Proclamation proclaiming the week of April 6-12, 1998, "Community Development Grant Week". (120.60) PRESENTATION - By Mayor Dettloff and the City Council to Huntington Beach High School Model United Nations Teams whose members are both National and International Title Winners. Advisors, Mr. Bill Seckington and Mr. Lynn Aase, Ms. Jill Hardy, and Principal Dr. James Staunton. (160.40) PRESENTATION - By Mayor Dettloff and the City Council to Marina Women's Lady Viking Basketball Team, CIF Southern Section Champions. Pete Bonny, Head Coach, Steve Samperi and Christa Yorke, Assistant Coaches, Athletic Director, Larry Doyle and Dr. Carol Osbrink, Principal. (160.40) PRESENTATION - By Mayor Dettloff and the City Council to Coaches and Players of Ocean View High School's Boys Basketball Team who are CIF Southern Section Champions. Jim Harris, Varsity Coach, Dan Johnson, Jimmy Harris, Rich Butler and Shawn Werner, Assistant Coaches. Henry Hays, Sophomore Coach, John Huber and Matt Clark, Freshman Coaches. Managers, Baron Newman and Matt Tanner. (160.40) jPage 6 - Council/Agency Minutes - 04/06/98 I PRESENTATION - By Mayor Dettloff and the City Council and representatives of Simple Green to those organizations which participated in the Adopt-A-Beach Program. Robin Walter, AYSO, Wayne Wolfe, Bolsa Chica Land Trust, Judy Rinker, Cub Scout Pack#278, Patty McGehee, Costa Mesa High/Golden West College Transition Class, Mary Jo Jeffes, Council on Aging, Myles Rubbelke, Cub Scout Pack#284, Cindy Perez, Cub Scout Pack 290, Rondi Nuno, Cub Scout Pack#470, Tony Marcova, D.I.V.E.R.S, Maria Ezcurra, Dwyer Middle School, Barbara Inskeep, Girl Scouts, Paul McLeith, Huntington Beach Exchange Club, Andy Verdone, Huntington Beach High School Surf Team, Linda Hayward, Mesa View Middle School, Penny Wiegand, OCCDMS, Janet Colley, West Grove Pony, Junette Gaskins, YMCA Indian Maidens. (160.40) ANNOUNCEMENT -APPOINTMENT OF RAY SILVER AS CITY ADMINISTRATOR Mayor Dettloff announced the appointment of Ray Silver as City Administrator of the City of Huntington Beach. APPOINTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT LINDA PITTEROFF Mayor Dettloff announced that Linda Pitteroff was appointed to the position of Administrative Assistant in the City Administrator's Office replacing recently retired Administrative Assistant Pat Jones. PUBLIC COMMENTS JUANA MUELLER, Bolsa Chica Land Trust member, invited Council and staff and all members of the public to the March For The Mesa event sponsored by the Bolsa Chica Land Trust. Ms. Mueller introduced Joel Sheldon, Environmental Engineer and long time city resident. Mr. Sheldon described the plans for the event which will begin at Warner Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway. He distributed invitations to the March For The Mesa. NANCY DONAVEN, Bolsa Chica Land Trust member, stressed the importance of sending the proposed letters to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. She stated that the Koll Company has changed the name of the Bolsa Chica Mesa to the Warner Mesa, but that the area should still be known as the Bolsa Chica Mesa. EILEEN MURPHY, Bolsa Chica Land Trust member, stated that she recommends that the letter to be sent by the City to the Koll Company should mention the Warner Mesa as well as the Bolsa Chica Mesa as the Koll Company has changed the name. She expressed her opinion that for the State to spend $90 million to restore the wetlands, then allow the Koll Company to dump their urban runoff into the outer Bolsa Bay is absolutely ridiculous. 04/06/98 -City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes - Page 7 JAN VANDERSLOOT, Bolsa Chica Land Trust member, thanked the Council for drawing up the proposed letter to forward to the Army Corps of Engineers relative to the Bolsa Chica drainage. He asked the Council to consider two revisions to the proposed letter; one revision is that because of these outfall structures the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers re-exert its jurisdiction rather than exert its jurisdiction over the Mesa because in the past they have had jurisdiction and that also that the phrase contrary to the public interest be placed in the letter. WILLIAM CURTIS, informed Council that he was the owner of property located on both sides of Magnolia Street. He stated that he is now convinced his property at is a wetlands. Mr. Curtis informed Council he would now like to have the City Council support his effort to make it all tidal flushing, with a lake 12 months a year and establish a sight-seeing operation. He stated that his plans are supported by Mr. Miller of the Orange County Flood Control District. Mr. Curtis stated this will be helpful to the city and that he has people who are interested in selling him their mitigation credits. Mr. Curtis stated that he is not asking anyone for money. He distributed informational material to Council. GERALD CHAPMAN, requested that the agenda item regarding funds for Huntington Central Park Equestrian.Event Site improvements be approved and that it be clarified that if the entire $80,000 is not spent that the horse show would only be responsible for what is spent and the rest of the funds will be returned to the General Fund. HOWARD SUBNICK, displayed a basketball and a chain saw which he stated is to demonstrate the difference between apples and oranges. He referred to the comparison between the citizens salary and police officers salary which was made by Councilmember Sullivan during the recent debate. GARY FINNEY, Fire Department employee, addressed Council regarding the issue of comparing a Radio Shack employee and a firefighter which had been raised during the recent debate between Councilmember Sullivan and Fire Captain Bruce Spencer. He presented a slide report on the matter. DARREN NEWTON, stated that he hoped for the city's sake and the employees' sake that strong leadership ability take place and negotiations be resolved with the public safety departments. RONALD THOMPSON, stated that he believed there is money for pay raises and referred to State and cable television tax revenues. He stated most cities provide 60-75% of their annual budget for public safety and the City of Huntington Beach devotes 54% of its budget. MIKE RAGSDALE, consultant with HR Consultants, stated that the city should not have wasted time conducting a search for City Administrator and should have just appointed Ray Silver as Ray Silver is qualified. He spoke regarding his conversations with the Personnel Director and stated that he had never received a phone call from the City Council in response to his calls regarding the process. Mr. Ragsdale stated reasons why he opposed the Council's selection of the search firm which assisted the City of San Diego in hiring Michael Uberuga as its City Administrator. Page 8 - Council/Agency Minutes -04/06/98 I GARY BROOKS, Police Officer, stated that it is going on six years without a contract or pay raise for the Police Department. He informed Council that he believes there is more common ground than differences between the Police Department and Council. Officer Brooks spoke regarding the low morale of the Police Department and as he understands it, the low morale of the Fire Department, Public Safety in general and the whole of the city. JOHN CONNER, retired firefighter, spoke regarding the debate between Councilmember Sullivan and Fire Captain Bruce Spencer. He stated that he wished to make a point that the firefighters serve county-wide at times and presented an example of the areas of the state where the Huntington Beach Firefighters have served. He spoke regarding the instances of injury and death of firefighters in the course of their service. Mr. Conner addressed Council in opposition relative to the PERS issue. SHARI DONOHO, representing the Moorhouse Family and the city's professional lifeguards, addressed Council in support of agenda item relative to the acceptance and establishment of a location for the Vincent G. Moorhouse Memorial Statue. Councilmember Sullivan spoke regarding the reasons why he believed the comments made tonight were not accurate including the comment regarding Radio Shack employees and the issue relative to PERS. He stated that he has never conducted employee bashing, but has just reported facts. He displayed a chart produced by the Finance Department on CPI versus salary benefits. Councilmember Bauer requested City Administrator Silver to confirm that salary raises have been offered. City Administrator Silver reported. Councilmember Harman asked what amount of money the city receives from Proposition 172 funds. Deputy City Administrator Franz stated that $7 million is being taken from the city by the State and $1 million is received from Proposition 172 funds. The slide report presented by Councilmember Sullivan was presented to City Clerk Brockway. CITY COUNCIL) APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS OF SUPPORT FOR THE SANTA ANA RIVER FLOOD PROTECTION AGENCY REQUESTS FOR FUNDING FOR STATE FLOOD SUBVENTION PROGRAM AND ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS CIVIL WORKS CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM ON SANTA ANA RIVER MAINSTEM PROJECT (120.90) The City Council considered a communication from Administration recommending that Resolutions of support be prepared for the Santa Ana River Flood Protection Agency request for funding for State Flood Subvention Program and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Civil Works Construction Program on the Santa Ana River Mainstem Project. Councilmember Green presented a report regarding the reasons why he placed this agenda item before Council. 04/06/98 - City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes - Page 9 A motion was made by Green, second Bauer to approve the following actions: 1. Authorize the City Attorney to prepare a Resolution of the City of Huntington Beach requesting support for increased Federal funding for Fiscal Year 1998-99 for the Army Corps of Engineers Civil Works Construction Program on Santa Ana River Mainstem Project; and 2. Authorize the City Attorney to prepare a Resolution of the City of Huntington Beach in support of funding of the State Flood Control Subvention Funding for Fiscal Year 1998-99 and 3.Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign these resolutions and forward them to each of these bodies and further that the resolutions be forwarded to all other cities and that the matter be placed on the Orange County League of Cities Agenda. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Green, Dettloff, Bauer, Sullivan NOES: None ABSENT: Julien, (Harman, Garofalo out of room) CITY ADMINISTRATOR ADDRESSES THE CITY COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY Newly appointed City Administrator Silver thanked the City Council for his appointment as City Administrator. He thanked his family and department heads, staff and citizens of the city for contributing to his successful appointment. (CITY COUNCIL) AUTHORIZE LETTERS AS AMENDED TO U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, COUNTY OF ORANGE, THE KOLL COMPANY AND OTHERS REGARDING PROPOSED BOLSA CHICA DRAINAGE STRUCTURES (440.60) The City Council considered a communication from the Community Development Director Fallon and Acting Public Works Director Smith transmitting pursuant to Council direction, letters to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Koll Company, the County of Orange and other permit issuing-agencies relative to the proposed Bolsa Chica Drainage Structures. Said letters have been revised to provide for the Mayor's signature and to incorporate suggestions of Councilmembers and the members of the public who spoke on the matter at the March 16, 1998 Council meeting. Community Development Director Fallon reported relative to the communication announced earlier in the meeting by City Clerk Brockway dated April 3,1998 (Substitute Draft Letter To the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers clarifying the language pertaining to public comment on the Army Corps of Engineers permit). At the request of Councilmember Garofalo, City Administrator Silver reported on the consultants who were working for the city on this issue and the difference between a Nationwide Permit and an Individual Permit. Page 10 -Council/Agency Minutes -04/06/98 Councilmember Garofalo stated that he believed the difference in permits was relative to the amount of acreage involved. Councilmember Garofalo stated that he believed.the word ' potential needs to be inserted as the first word of Paragraph Nos. 1 and 2 in the Substitute ' Letter. Councilmember Harman stated that the words'contrary to public interest should be inserted as well as requesting the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to re-exert their control rather than exert Mayor Pro Tem Green stated that he did not want to include the word re-exert if it was only waterways jurisdiction and not jurisdiction of the Mesa which the Army Corps of Engineers had previous control over. A motion was made by Harman, second Sullivan to approve the following recommended action: Authorize the Mayor to sign letters to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Koll Company, the County of Orange and other permit issuing agencies requesting an opportunity for the City and public to review and comment on all Bolsa Chica permit applications and further to include the words contrary to public interest and further if the staff determines that the Army Corps of Engineers at one time had jurisdiction that the word re-exert be included. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Harman, Green, Dettloff, Bauer, Sullivan NOES: Garofalo ABSENT: Julien A motion was made by Green, second Garofalo that the word potential be included as the first word on Paragraph Nos. 1 and 2 of the Substitute Letter. The motion failed by the following roll call tie vote: AYES: Green, Dettloff, Garofalo NOES: Harman, Bauer, Sullivan ABSENT: Julien CITY CLERK ANNOUNCES LATE COMMUNICATIONS -PUBLIC WORKS HEART BEAT OF HUNTINGTON BEACH-REPORT REGARDING POTHOLES AND THEIR CAUSES AND COUNCILMEMBER SULLIVAN'S SLIDE REPORT REGARDING: POLICE OFFICER CPI VS. SALARY/BENEFIT INCREASES City Clerk Brockway announced that she had copies of the Public Works report titled Public Works Heart Beat of Huntington Beach -Regarding Potholes And Their Causes prepared by the Public Works Department. She stated that she had also been provided with a copy of Councilmember Sullivan's slide report presented earlier in the meeting by Councilmember Sullivan titled Police Officer CPI Versus Salary/Beneht Increases. 04/06/98 - City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes - Page 11 (CITY COUNCIL) REPORT TO COUNCIL REGARDING: GARAGE LOCATED AT 927 10TH STREET ON WHICH SUBJECT AROSE DURING PUBLIC COMMENTS AT MARCH 16, 1998 COUNCIL MEETING (120.90) The City Council considered a transmittal from City Administrator Silver of a report from Planning Director Zelefsky to the Planning Commission dated March 2, 1998 regarding code provisions on a garage located at 927 10th Street. This subject arose at the March 16, 1998 Council meeting at which time staff informed Council a report would be provided to Council at this meeting. Community Development Director Fallon presented a staff report. Mike Strange, Senior Planner, reported on the new home which is proposed to be built at which time this code violation would be rectified. Senior Planner Strange responded to questions of Council. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT REPORT REGARDING STREET POTHOLES AND THEIR CAUSES Acting Public Works Director Smith presented a slide report titled Public Works The Heart Beat of Huntington Beach, regarding street potholes and their causes. Councilmember Harman requested that if it does not take too much staff time, an inventory of the main arterial streets, the condition of those streets - all the north - south streets and the east-west streets and some kind of rating structure, whether they are in good, poor, unsatisfactory condition, and what is it going to take to fix them. He requested some sort of spread sheet on what is staffs plan and timeline, priorities and costs. Don Noble, Maintenance Operations Manager, reported on various issues relating to potholes on city streets. Councilmember Bauer, in response to Councilmember Harman, stated that the County has not restored AH.FP (Arterial Highway Finance Program Funding). Discussion was held regarding available County funding. Page 12 - Council/Agency Minutes -04/06/98 (CITY COUNCIL) PUBLIC HEARING -APPROVAL OF THE ACTION PLAN 1998-99 FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) AND HOME PROGRAMS (340.70) Mayor Dettloff announced that this was the meeting set for a public hearing to consider the following: 1998199 Action Plan CDBG Activity Summary, TABLE IV Community Development Block Grant CDBG REVENUE: AMOUNT CDBG 1998/99 Entitlement Grant $1,672,000 Activities: Administration $289,415 Fair Housing Council 44,985 Code Enforcement Program -2 Officers 169,694 Security Lighting - Enhancement Areas 24,000 Housing Rehabilitation —Administration 94,100 Oak View Community Center- Expansion Design 7,500 Golden West College - Child Care Facility 99,992 Sewer repair- Enhancement Areas, various 256,600 Public Improvements -Washington Enhancement Area' 408,500 Community Services Department/OCTA contract for transportation 12,000 Project Self-Sufficiency 71,483 Senior Outreach Program 13,375 Adult Day Services 15,000 Boys & Girls Club - Financial Assistance 12,000 Boys & Girls Club -Teen Program 5,000 Community Service Program (Gang Prevention) 15,000 Episcopal Service Alliance (ESA) 10,000 HB Community Clinic 30,000 Hotline 6,250 Interval House -the shelter's children's program 22,675 Literacy Volunteers of America 15,000 Oak View Community Center 35,017 OC Council on Aging - Ombudsman Services 6,000 Special Children's Connection - Child Care 5,000 Contin-gency Funds 3,414 TOTAL: $1,672,000 (`$66,000 in Reprogramming Funds are added to this figure, fora total of$474,000) PROGRAM INCOME(Estimated): $270,000 Payments and interest received from housing rehab loans are made available for new loans through a Revolving Loan fund. 04/06/98 -City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes - Page 13 HOME Investment Partnership In an effort to expand and preserve its existing affordable housing stock, Huntington Beach has worked with Community Housing Development Organizations (CHDOs) to acquire multifamily rental properties. These buildings are rehabilitated and then are made available to persons below 60% of Orange County median income for a minimum of 30 years. The CHDO must enter into an agreement with the City that outlines all of the affordability requirements, property maintenance standards, and long-term monitoring requirements that are required by HOME regulations. The following activities are proposed for the 1997/98 HOME Program: Allocation Administration Acquisition Rehabilitation Construction 97/98 HOME $636,000 $63,600 $572,400 0 0 The CP sets local policies and priorities for the development of a viable urban community by providing decent housing and a suitable living environment and expanding economic opportunities principally for low-and moderate-income persons. The city intends to extend and strengthen partnerships among all levels of government and the private sector, including for- profit and non-profit organizations in order to provide for the production and operation of affordable housing; a suitable living environment improving the safety and livability of neighborhoods; assistance to homeless persons and persons at risk of becoming homeless to obtain appropriate housing, without discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, familial status, or disability; and expand economic opportunities including job creation and retention. Economic Development Director Biggs and Carol Runzel, Assistant Project Manager, presented a staff report utilizing slides. In response to Councilmember Harman, Ms. Runzel, stated that the slide report designating $35,000 to the Community Clinic was an error and that the amount is $30,000 . Legal notice as provided by the Economic Development Department to the City Clerk's Office had been mailed, published and posted. City Clerk Brockway announced that the following communications had been provided to the City Council: Slide Report from Economic Development Director Biggs Slide show presentation from Councilmember Garofalo dated April 6,1998 regarding Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Page 14 - Council/Agency Minutes - 04/06/98 Mayor Dettloff declared the public hearing open. LINDA LIGHT, representing Literacy Volunteers of America/Huntington Valley, requested Council approval of the CPAB recommendation for$15,000 funding for the Literacy Volunteer Program. Ms. Light reported on different programs offered by the Literacy Volunteers. OLYMPIA SANTANA, literacy student, read a statement to the Council regarding her experience as a person who has been tutored by a literacy volunteer tutor. i MARY DE SLOOVER, President of Literacy Volunteers of America-Huntington Valley, thanked Council for their past and present support of the literacy programs. She stated that the other student who was to be present this evening was absent as he has passed a truck driving test and is now working due to his having been tutored. TANYA GRIMES, Executive Director of The Boys And Girls Club, addressed Council in support of their programs including the child care program enabling parents to work and not be dependent on welfare. She spoke regarding the teen program offered by the Boys and Girls Club. Ms. Grimes informed Council of what the cuts proposed will mean to the Teen Program and the Financial Assistance Program. CINDY CONDICT, spoke regarding her bad experience with the Fair Housing Council. She stated that it was through the efforts of Mayor Dettloff and Carol Runzel, Assistant Project Manager, that had helped her through this crisis. She requested that Council see that the Fair Housing Council carry through with the assistance that they provide to persons. CORDULA DICK-MUEHLKE, spoke on behalf of the Adult Day Care Services of Orange County. She stated that the ground-breaking at the Bushard Street and Indianapolis Avenue location will be held soon. She informed Council of the importance of this Adult Day Care Center to the community. JANINE LIMAS, spoke in support of the Interval House and thanked Council for their past support. She stated that the money will go to their children's program. ROY RICHARDSON, CPAB member, spoke regarding the meetings held by the CPAB. He recommended that the CPAB recommendations be approved. There being no one to speak further on the matter and there being no further protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by Mayor Dettloff. Councilmember Garofalo presented a slide report titled Community Starts At Home dated April 6,1998 which had been announced by City Clerk Brockway during the announcement of Late Communications earlier in the meeting. 04/06/98 - City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes - Page 15 A motion was made by Harman, second Green to approve the following recommended actions: 1. Approve the 1998/99 Action Plan for the Community Development Block Grant and HOME Programs as referenced as Attachment 1, for the amounts of$1,672,000 and $638,000 respectively, for a program year to begin July 1, 1998 and end September 30, 1999, and authorize its submission to the U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development and authorize the City Administrator to execute the required Certifications. 2. Approve that if there is an increase in the Public Services cap, that the activities to receive the funds would be 1) the Seniors Outreach Program and 2) the Huntington Beach Community Clinic at an amount not to exceed the requested grant amount. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Harman, Green, Dettloff, Bauer, Sullivan, Garofalo NOES: None ABSENT: Julien (CITY COUNCIL) PUBLIC HEARING - REVIEW OF PUBLIC WORKS DECISION ON EDWARDS STREET/TALBERT AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSIDERATION BY COUNCIL OF COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 97-31/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 97-25 (EDWARDS STREET IMPROVEMENTS) (420.80) Communication from Acting Public Works Director Smith. Mayor Dettloff announced that this was the meeting set for a public hearing to consider the following: Applicant: City of Huntington Beach, Public Works Department. Request: To widen Edwards Street between Ellis Avenue and Inlet Drive to its ultimate width per the General Plan Circulation Element and reduce the south side of Talbert Avenue between Edwards Street and Fieldbury Lane. Location: Edwards Street (segment north of Ellis Avenue and south of Inlet Drive, including intersection of Talbert and Edwards) and Talbert Avenue (segment from Edwards Street to Fieldbury Lane.) Environmental Status: An initial environmental assessment (Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 97-25) for the above item was processed and completed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. It was determined that the above items, with mitigation, would not have any significant environmental effects and that a mitigated negative declaration is warranted. This environmental assessment is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department. Page 16 - Council/Agency Minutes - 04/06/98 Coastal/Zone Status: The above item is located in the appealable jurisdiction of the Coastal Zone and includes Coastal Development Permit No. 97-31, filed on November 17, 1997, in ` conjunction with the above request. The Coastal Development Permit hearing consists of a staff report, public hearing, City Council discussion and action. City Council action on the above item may be appealed to the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days from the date of receipt of the notice of final City action by the Coastal Commission pursuant to Section 245.32 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and Section 13110 of the California Code of Regulations. The Coastal Commission address is South Coast Area office, 200 Oceangate, 10th Floor, Long Beach, California.90802-4302. i Acting Public Works Director Smith presented a staff report. ' Dave Webb, Acting Deputy City Engineer, presented a staff report. f Discussion was held between Council and Acting Deputy City Engineer Webb regarding the rationale used for the recommendation for the proposed light at Talbert Avenue and Edwards Street including the plan to leave the stop sign at Varsity Drive. Legal notice as provided by the Public Works Department to the City Clerk's Office had been mailed, published and posted. City Clerk Brockway announced that the following communications had been provided to the City Council: Five communications expressing opposition to the proposed signal at Talbert and Edwards as follows: Communication from Mrs. Smith dated April 2,1998; Communication from Martin and Denise Menichiello dated April 2,1998; Communication from Mrs. Hollander, dated April 4,1998; Communication from Gordon M. Watson, President of the Country View Estates Homeowners Association dated April 3,1998; a letter from Jerry Buchanan, Assistant Superintendent, Huntington Beach City School District regarding school buses traveling on Edwards Street up the hill to Ellis Avenue. Communication dated March 18,1998 from the Huntington Beach School District regarding the impact to the district of a stop light at Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue as buses will have to proceed up Edwards Hill at two miles per hour and hinder traffic. A communication from Acting Public Works Director Smith dated April 3,1998 in response to a letter from Jerry Buchanan, Assistant Superintendent, Huntington Beach City School District regarding school buses traveling on Edwards Street up the hill to Ellis Avenue. Also communications included in the City Council Agenda Packet from Ms. Reed dated April 3,1998 and from John Fisher dated April 2,1998 in opposition to a traffic signal at Talbert Avenue and Edwards Street. City Clerk Brockway announced that communication listed on Page 8 of the Council Agenda is from the Acting Public Works Director rather than the Economic Development Director 04/06/98 -City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes - Page 17 '\f Mayor Dettloff declared the public hearing open. THOMAS BURKET, stated that he believed from a purely technical standpoint that the Public Works Department plan approved at the last Public Works Commission meeting is a good solution and more importantly from a socio-economic standpoint. He stated that it benefits the most local residents and adversely impacts the fewest of the local residents. BETTY JONES, spoke in favor of the staff recommendations. She stated that she believes the .traffic signal and a marked crosswalk is a necessity. She stated that she realizes the residences backing up to the traffic signal will be impacted, but that it is a matter of safety. JERRY JONES, spoke in support of the traffic signal and crosswalk. He spoke regarding the first recommendation on this matter which the people because of safety issues requested another action. He stated that he believed the alternative put the children at severe hazard. He presented a letter to the City Council. COLLEEN HOWATT, stated her concern is for the children. She stated that since the stop sign was put in, the accidents have been cut down there and there have been no more traffic fatalities. Ms. Howatt informed Council that the cars do not stop when people attempt to cross Inlet Drive and there is difficulty in trying to cross to the park. She stated that the signal is needed. MUSS JASO, displayed a drawing showing Fieldbury Lane where she resides. She stated her concern if the left turn lane is no longer available to Edwards Street that it will be unacceptable to the residents. She spoke in support of the Public Works Department recommended action. JERRY JASO, spoke in support of the recommended action for reasons including the safety issue and for not having their tract turned into a major arterial. He stated he understood others objections, but the greater good of the community would be served by the traffic light. BRIAN FRONK, displayed a diagram of the area and spoke in opposition to the removal of the left turn, stating the need for the safety of children. He stated that putting the signal light in values the lives of children above other considerations. Mr. Fronk spoke regarding other detrimental effects including the types of traffic confusion that would result if a signal light were not installed. RAY SHAW, stated that he is in favor of the left turn; that he believes the traffic signal will help however no matter how you cut it it looks like the residents on Fieldbury Lane will have more traffic from the new development on the hill. He stated that allowing the left turn will minimize that but as there is no left turn going in on Inlet Drive people will go around the other way to go through their neighborhood which has 18 children as mentioned'earlier. RICHARD ODELL, spoke in support of maintaining the left turn lane not only off Talbert Avenue onto Edwards Street, but also out of Inlet Drive as it will minimize the negative impacts that this decision is likely to inflict upon the neighborhood. He stated they realize the impact to the residents backing up to the signal. Page 18 - Council/Agency Minutes - 04/06/98 JERRY BUCHANAN, representing the Huntington Beach City School District, spoke regarding the problems of the buses on Edwards Hill including the problem of proceeding up the hill from a stopped position. Discussion was held between Council and Mr. Buchanan regarding issues including the possibility of re-routing the buses, sequencing of lights, and a device like that used by ambulances although the Fire Department indicates this is not feasible. ROBERT THOMAS, stated he is in favor of the Public Works Commission's proposed traffic controls on Edwards Hill. He stated that it is well to keep in mind amidst the rancorous whinings about inconvenience and noise etc.; that this is the month of the 11th Anniversary of the date that a young woman was killed riding her bike up Edwards Hill, by a drunk driver. He stated that more recently a lady was killed while attempting to cross the street at Varsity Drive and Edwards Street where again excessive speed and reckless vehicle operation were the factors. He stated that the construction of the new Linear Park will mean that a great deal more foot traffic will be in evidence crossing between the old and new sections. BART HOLLANDER, presented background information on the matter and referred to his earlier communication which is part of the Council Agenda Packet. He stated he believed this issue originated because people did not want.to lose their left turn from Talbert Avenue onto northbound Edwards Street. He spoke regarding the study and alternatives. He stated that he believed Council was hearing a distortion of the facts and stated the figures in the study showing the low number of left hand turns. He stated his concern that there is more potential for danger created from the signal than from not having the signal. He referred to the Transportation Circulation Study where it states there will be no impacts or hazards to safety from design feature however he believes that there is a risk as evidenced by the installation of a flashing signal. Mr. Hollander reported on what he believes are inaccuracies in the Public Works Commission's comments on the issue relative to the viewpoints of the public at the Commission's meetings regarding why no one had agreed to the original proposal and also regarding the position he expressed in his letter. Mr. Hollander presented reasons why he believes the intersection ought to be left as is, but if a change is wanted there could be an addition of a turn-in median-safety lane when you turn left off of Talbert Avenue on to Edwards Street which he stated would make everyone happy. Councilmember Bauer requested clarification from Mr. Hollander regarding what was the original purpose. Dave Webb, Acting Deputy City Engineer spoke regarding the original proposal. MAXWELL SMITH, addressed Council and stated that a lot of things stated tonight are not factual, but are perceptions. He requested that a study be done on the effect on drivers of sunlight on the proposed traffic signal especially in the evening, going towards Edwards Hill. He presented reasons in opposition to the signal light as he believes it will increase traffic. Mr. Smith stated that he believed there should be a light at Varsity Drive and the children should be allowed to cross there where it's a little bit safer condition. 04/06/98 - City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes - Page 19 ALAN REID, spoke in opposition to the proposed light. He stated that he believed if there is a signal light there will be increased traffic in to Fieldbury Lane. He stated that at the original Public Works Commission meeting it was stated that typically with a new traffic signal there is an increase in rear end traffic collisions not a decrease. He stated figures relating to the traffic counts. He stated there is a lot less traffic at the intersection turning left from Talbert Avenue onto Edwards Street than has been presented here according to the summary of counts of the Public Works Commission. Mr. Reid stated that he believes a lower speed limit would help solve the problem together with four lanes. WILLIAM SMALLSHAW, informed Council of his support for the recommended actions. He stated that the issue is not noise as all will be affected by the widening of Edwards Street; that the real issue is diverting major arterial traffic into a residential tract which is bad public policy. He stated if children should be injured in Fieldbury Lane tract that the city will bear some of the responsibility if it is from traffic that has been diverted into a residential area off of an arterial. There being no one to speak further on the matter and there being no further protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by Mayor Dettloff. A motion was made by Harman, second Garofalo to approve the following recommended actions: 1. Uphold the February 18, 1998, Public Works Commission support of a traffic signal at Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue; and 2. Approve Negative Declaration 97-25 (Attachment No. 4)with findings and mitigation measures as set forth in (Attachment No. 2) to the Request for Council Action dated April 6, 1998; and 3. Approve Coastal Development Permit No. 97-31 with findings and conditions of approval as set forth in (Attachment No. 2) to the Request for Council Action dated April 6, 1998. Councilmember Garofalo stated that he would support it on the absolute mandate that the lights at the top and bottom of the hill being synchronized, an agressively marked crosswalk with perhaps decals, and investigation of the device on the buses similar to those used by ambulances which would work with the synchronization issue. Councilmember Bauer stated that he believes people will still cross at Inlet Drive and not go to the designated crossing points. He also stated that perhaps a caution sign should be placed to warn people of the possibility of industrial type slow vehicles ahead and the Deputy City Engineer stated that a "steep grade ahead" type of sign could be placed prior to the hill. Page 20.- Council/Agency Minutes -04/06/98 Councilmember Harman stated that is not convinced that a traffic signal is needed at the top of ! the hill at Ellis Avenue and stated he would like the installation deferred if possible to a later date in order to see if it is needed. City Engineer Eichblatt, reported on the matter and stated that this signal light is a condition of two proposed tract developments. Mayor Dettloff stated the reasons why she wants to see the light at the top of the hill including that if you get speeds up from Garfield down and then you hit that hill and you have a light at the bottom, that, to her is the danger, but that she will support this because of the light up at Ellis where you stop and do not have the speed. She stated that the light rather than the current stop sign, guarantees, she thinks, more safety at the bottom of the hill, and that's going to be dangerous as it is down at the bottom, and with children crossing to access the park. The motion made by Harman, second Garofalo carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Harman, Green, Dettloff, Bauer, Sullivan, Garofalo NOES: None ABSENT: Julien (CITY COUNCIL) PUBLIC HEARING -APPROVED INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 3393 ESTABLISHING NEW RECREATIONAL PARKING ZONE AND ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 98-25 AMENDING THE CITY FEE SCHEDULE BY AMENDING BEACH PARKING AND MAIN PROMENADE PARKING STRUCTURE PASS FEES (340.20) Mayor Dettloff announced that this was the meeting set for a public hearing to consider the following: Public hearing for the purpose of amending the city fee resolution by amending a portion of Community Services Department fees for beach parking pass yearly rates and Main Promenade Parking Structure pass monthly and yearly rates. In addition, a new ordinance is being recommended to establish a new recreational parking zone and fee for the Pier Plaza parking lots. The city is proposing the following: Increasing the yearly beach parking pass from $60 to $100; the prorated yearly beach parking pass after Labor Day from $25 to $35; the monthly Main Promenade Parking Structure pass from $10 to $20; the yearly structure parking pass from $60 to $100; and the prorated yearly structure parking pass after Labor Day from $25 to $35. The yearly beach parking pass and Main Promenade Parking Structure pass for seniors will remain at $25. The estimated amount of yearly revenue to be raised by the proposed amendments is $20,000. The increased revenue from the fee changes in the parking facilities will be used to offset the debt service for the Pier Plaza parking lots and the Main Promenade Parking Structure. Legal notice as provided by the Community Services Department to the City Clerk's Office had been mailed, published and posted. 04/06/98 - City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes - Page 21 City Clerk Brockway announced that the following communication had been provided to the City Council: Slide show presentation from Community Services Department dated April 3,1998 titled Huntington Beach Parking Fees- Overview Mayor Dettloff declared the public hearing open. There being no one to speak on the matter and there being no protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by Mayor Dettloff. City Clerk Brockway read Ordinance No. 3393 by title. A motion was made by Green, second Garofalo to approve the following recommended actions: 1. Approve introduction of Ordinance No. 3393 - "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending Chapter 10.60 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code by Adding Sections 10.60.010 (c)(8) and 10.60.020 (c)(4) Relating to Parking Meter Zones Located at the Pier Plaza Parking Lots." and 2. Adopt Resolution No. 98 25 - "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Amending Resolution No. 5159 Entitled, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Establishing a City Fee Schedule"As To Services Offered Under the Community Services Department(Supplemental Fee Resolution No. 63)"(Amends the city fee schedule by adding a new fee for Pier Plaza Parking, and increasing the parking pass fees for the beach and the Main Promenade Parking Structure.) The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Harman, Green, Dettloff, Bauer, Sullivan, Garofalo NOES: None ABSENT: Julien (REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY) BLOCKS 104/105 OWNER PARTICIPANT SELECTION - (MAIN STREET/6TH STREET/5TH STREETMALNUT AVENUE) -APPROVED DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY -AUTHORIZED STAFF TO PREPARE EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATING AGREEMENT WITH CIM/FEDERAL REALTY FOR AGENCY APPROVAL (410.20) The City Council considered a communication from Economic Development Director Biggs and Community Development Director Fallon regarding the need for a Development Strategy to be in place for Blocks 104 and 105, and informing the Agency members that the seven Owner- Participant proposals received by the Redevelopment Agency have been evaluated. Approval Page 22 - Council/Agency Minutes -04/06/98 of a development strategy with the selection of an Owner-Participant will allow for redevelopment of the site. Economic Development Director Biggs presented a staff report. Considerable discussion was held. Earlier in the meeting, the City Clerk had announced that the following communications on this item had been provided to the City Council: Communication from Mr. Abdelmuti, Abdelmuti Development Company dated April 6,1998 in opposition to a complete closure of 5th Street and the elimination of the parking lot behind his building Communication from Mike Roberts, CR Companies dated April 6,1998 in opposition to consideration being given to the closure of 5th Street and to the consideration of an all commercial development on Block 104 and 105 Slide Report from Economic Development Director Biggs titled Block 104/Block 105 Proposals - City Council Study Session -April 6,1998 Communication from John H. Tillotson, Jr., Tillotson Enterprises dated April 6,1998 in opposition to the closure of 5th Street KEITH BOHR, representing T.C. Management Incorporated, addressed Council and stated that they will be starting the Conditional Use Permit process soon. He distributed a document to the City Council. He stated reasons why he did not believe the CIM plan could happen, even though it looks good on paper. He stated the very many problems he saw, even though CIM is a good company. JAMES LANE, spoke in support of Mr. Bohr's comments. He stated his concern with the closure of 5th Street and also the effect on the low income residents of this area. TIM STRIPE, Co-President of Grand Pacific Resorts, Carlsbad California, commented on items in the staff report including revenue to be generated; that the numbers for Grand Pacific Resorts in Attachment No. 3 in the Staff Report may be an error. He stated their proposal in its current form will not close 5th Street. FRANK CRACCHIOLO, stated that he believes that that they now have a plan that will work after many attempts. He requested Council's support. ANN MASE, spoke in opposition to the CIM proposal for reasons including that the proposal of the CIM Group is approved after only nine months and she has worked in cooperation with the city since 1981 to develop her property. SHAUL KUBA, CIM Group, spoke in support of the CIM proposed project. 04/06/98 -City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes - Page 23 .1 JOHN GIVEN, representing CIM Group with Federal Realty, spoke in support of the proposal, stating that tonight is not the time to make a decision on a project or to make a decision on 5th Street. A motion was made by Bauer, second Sullivan to approve the following recommended actions: 1. Approve a Development Strategy for Blocks 104 and 105 that seeks joint development of the two blocks and utilize a traditional redevelopment approach including property acquisition of the Main Street properties and new construction with an Owner-Participant developer; and 2. Direct Staff to prepare a 120 Day Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) with CIM/Federal Realty and return to the Redevelopment Agency for approval of the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement at the earliest possible date. Following discussion by Council the motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Harman, Green, Dettloff, Bauer, Sullivan NOES: Garofalo ABSENT: Julien A REQUEST BY CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO TAKE ACTION ON AGENDA ITEMS EXCEPT THOSE REMOVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL In response to Mayor Pro Tern Green's proposal that the City Council adjourn and continue the remaining portion of the agenda to the next meeting, City Administrator Silver requested that Council approve all the remaining items agenda by one vote, except for the items Council may wish to consider separately. The City Council removed the following items from the Agenda for separate discussion and/or Deferred to a future meeting: Recommendation To Receive And File Big Independent Cities Excess Pool (Bicep) Financial Statements And Independent Auditor's Report (Deferred to April 20,1998) Approval of Funds For Huntington Central Park Equestrian Event Site Improvements - Amendment To Fiscal Year 97/98 General Fund Budget (Separate discussion) Request To Prepare And Distribute Request For Proposal To Professional Consultants For Assistance In The Intergovernmental Affairs Program (Deferred to April 20,1998) Resolution No. 98-19 - Revised Conflict Of Interest Code (Deferred to April 20.1998) Introduction Of Ordinance No. 3391 Relating To The Filing Of Statements Of Economic Interest By Members Of Boards, Commissions And Committees (Deferred to April 20,1998) Page 24 -Council/Agency Minutes - 04/06/98 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS APPROVED -ADOPTION OF ORDINANCES APPROVED - ' ` ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM APPROVED -CITY COUNCIL " H" ITEMS APPROVED r ' A motion was made by Green, second Garofalo to approve the following items on the City ! Council Agenda in a Consent Calendar vote procedure: (CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY) MINUTES -Approved and adopted the minutes of the City Council/Redevelopment Agency regular meeting of March 2, 1998, adjourned regular meeting of March 9, 1998, and regular meeting of March 16, 1998 as written and on file in the Office of the City Clerk. (CITY COUNCIL)APPROVED RELEASE OF BONDS -TRACT NO. 14043 - NORTH SIDE OF GOLDENWEST STREET, WEST SIDE OF LITTLE HARBOR LANE -SEACLIFF PARTNERS INC. - 1. Released the Faithful Performance/Labor& Material Bond No. 8577 and Monument Bond No. 8578; and 2. Instructed the City Clerk to notify the developer, Seacliff Partners of this action, and the City Treasurer to notify the bonding company, Pacific States Company, of this { action. (420.60) (CITY COUNCIL) APPROVED RELEASE OF BONDS -TRACT NO. 14277 - SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF DORAL DRIVE AND MORNING SIDE DRIVE - PENINSULA 1 PARTNERS, INC. - 1. Released the Faithful Performance/Labor& Material Bond No. 8593 and Monument Bond No. 8594; and 2. Instructed the City Clerk to notify the developer, Peninsula 1 Partners of this action and the City Treasurer to notify the bonding company, Pacific States Company, of this action. (420.60) (CITY COUNCIL) APPROVED PARK LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY FOR LANGENBECK PARK -Approved the License Agreement with Southern California Edison Company to utilize 8.19 acres of property at Langenbeck Park for five years at $100 per acre per year, and authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to execute same. (600.10) (CITY COUNCIL) APPROVED SYCAMORE AVENUE SEWER REHABILITATION PROJECT - FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS -APPROVE SAMPLE CONTRACT - CC-1045 (600.60) 1. Approved the attached sample contract subject to award of contract to the lowest responsive/responsible bidder and 2. Approved final plans and specifications, and direct the City Clerk to advertise the Sycamore Avenue Sewer Rehabilitation Project for bid. (CITY COUNCIL) ACCEPTANCE OF DEED FROM PLC COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT - HOLLY-SEACLIFF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AREA (PROMENADE PARKWAY) -Accepted the Easement Deed from the PLC Company for street right-of-way purposes in the Holly-Seacliff Development area-Tract 14661 and retroactively approved the City Clerk's recordation of said deed on April 15, 1997. (AP# 111-073-07 and AP# 159-311- 18,19,22 Promenade Parkway/Seagate Drive/Main Street.) (650.80) 04/06/98 -City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes - Page 25 (CITY COUNCIL)APPROVED SIXTY-DAY NOTICE AND WAIVER REQUEST FROM COUNTY OF ORANGE REGARDING: PROVISIONS OF MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES IN DONATED SPACE AT OCEAN VIEW HIGH SCHOOL - RESOLUTION NO. 98-24 -Adopted Resolution No. 98-24 pursuant to Government Code Section 25351 - "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Granting Waiver of 60-Day Notice for Donation of Space to the County of Orange for a Modular Classroom at Ocean View High School for the Provision of Mental Health Services." (570.10) (CITY COUNCIL) ACCEPTED AND ESTABLISHED A LOCATION FOR THE VINCENT G. MOORHOUSE MEMORIAL STATUE - 1. Accepted, on behalf of the city, the donation of a - statue of a brown pelican in honor of Vincent G. Moorhouse and establish a temporary location for the memorial statue on the grassy area immediately south of Lifeguard Headquarters; approved placing the statue, on a permanent basis, within the South Beach Improvement Project when South Beach is renovated. 2. Approved the relocation of the Vincent.G. Moorhouse Statue from the proposed interim location to its final location when the South Beach Improvement Project moves forward. The city also acknowledges the Moorhouse Foundation will be responsible for annual maintenance and upkeep of the statue as needed. (130.55) (CITY COUNCIL/PARKING AUTHORITY) ADOPT RESOLUTIONS TO PROVIDE CLEAR TITLE TO DUKE'S SURF CITY FOR THEIR LEASE HOLD INTEREST IN PIER PLAZA (TERMINATION OF LEASE BETWEEN CITY AND PARKING AUTHORITY FOR PARKING STRUCTURE NEAR THE PIER) -Approved the following actions: Parking Authority Action: Adopted Resolution No. 31 entitled - "A Resolution of the Parking Authority of the City of Huntington Beach, Acknowledging the Termination of the Lease Between the City and the Parking Authority of the City of Huntington Beach for a Parking Structure in the Vicinity of the Huntington Beach Pier."and City Council Action: Adopted Resolution No. 98-26 entitled - "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, Acknowledging the Termination of the Lease between the City and the Parking Authority of the City of Huntington Beach for a Parking Structure in the Vicinity of Huntington Beach Pier." (600.05) (CITY COUNCIL) APPROVED CONTRACT WITH EIP ASSOCIATES FOR PREPARATION OF AN ADDENDUM TO THE SUPPLEMENT TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 82-2 FOR THE WATERFRONT PROJECT AND APPROVE MODIFICATIONS TO INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS -Approved and authorized execution of the contract between the City of Huntington Beach and EIP Associates for consulting services to prepare an Environmental Impact Report Addendum for the proposed Waterfront project in an amount not to exceed $22,645, with the amendment recommended by the Insurance Settlement Committee to the 'Indemnification and Hold Harmless' section of the City's standard professional services contract as set forth in (Attachment No. 1) to the Request for Council Action dated April 6, 1998. (600.10) J Page 26 -Council/Agency Minutes - 04/06/98 (CITY COUNCIL) REALLOCATED FUNDS FOR PARKING SIGNAGE AT PIER PLAZA - BUDGET AMENDMENT-Approved an amendment to the Fiscal Year 97/98 budget to transfer funds previously approved by City Council from the Pier Plaza Project contingency in the amount of$125,000 from Account No. E-AA-CS-346-3-90-00 to the Account No. ECL-PC-029-3-90-00. (320.20) (CITY COUNCIL)APPROVED THE ACCEPTANCE OF AN IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION -STREET EASEMENT EAST SIDE OF NEWLAND STREET - SOUTHERN ( I CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY AP NO. 114-150-16 AND 17 -Approved the action taken on December 17, 1997 by the Mayor and City Clerk relative to the acceptance and execution of ' the Irrevocable Offer of Dedication from the Southern California Edison Company-Street I Easement for the future widening of Newland Street. (650.80) (CITY COUNCIL)APPROVED OF AGREEMENT FOR GENERAL MANAGEMENT, ENGINEERING, SECRETARIAL AND FISCAL AGENT SERVICES BETWEEN THE WEST ORANGE COUNTY WATER BOARD AND THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH -Approved and authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the attached Agreement By And Between The City Of Huntington Beach And The West Orange County Water Board For Contract Manager Services, General Management, Engineering, Secretarial And Fiscal Agent Services. I (600.10) I (CITY COUNCIL)APPROVED AGENT'S CONTRACT FOR NAMING RIGHTS/CORPORATE PARTNERING PROGRAM - PIER PLAZA PROJECT AND APPROVED PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY WAIVER - 1. Approved the attached contract with Schulte Sports Enterprises (SSE) for naming rights/corporate partnering, and authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to execute - "Agreement Between The City Of Huntington Beach And Schulte Sports Enterprises For Appointment Of An Agent For The Negotiation And Procurement Of A Naming Rights Agreement To Pier Plaza-and 2. Approved an amendment to the Fiscal Year 97/98 Pier Plaza Fund budget to allocate $30,000 of contingency into the new Pier Plaza Fund for project startup costs; and 3. Authorized the expenditure of$30,000 from the Pier Plaza Project Contingency Fund for startup costs for print materials/brochures and agent's draw to be reimbursed to the Pier Plaza Fund from the commissions paid to Schulte Sports Enterprises upon receipt of revenue; and 4. Directed staff to work with Schulte Sports Enterprises to develop a naming rights/corporate partnering benefits package to bring back to City Council for approval for the Pier Plaza project. and 5. Approved waiver of professional liability insurance requirement as recommended by the Settlement Committee on March 11, 1998. (600.10) Earlier in the meeting, City Clerk Brockway had announced that the following communication on this item had been provided to the City Council: Slide show presentation from the Community Services Department dated April 6,1998 regarding the proposed contract with Schulte Sports Enterprises 95 for naming rights/corporate partnering relative to Pier Plaza 04/06/98 -City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes - Page 27 } (CITY COUNCIL)ADOPTED ORDINANCE NO. 3390 - REDUCING THE UTILITY TAX LATE PAYMENT PENALTY - FOLLOWING A READING BY TITLE ADOPTED "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending Chapter 3.36 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code Pertaining to the Collection Procedures for the Utility Users Tax." (640.10) (CITY COUNCIL)ADOPTED ORDINANCE NO. 3392 -CODE AMENDMENT NO. 98-1 AMENDING MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.32030(A) PERTAINING TO THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE STATE SMOKING LAW BY CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS - FOLLOWING A READING BY TITLE ADOPTED - "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending Chapter 2.32 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code Pertaining to Powers and Duties of Department of Community Development." (640.10) (CITY COUNCIL) REQUEST FOR PERMISSION TO BE ABSENT -COUNCILMEMBER JULIEN -Aproved Cuncilmember Julien's request for permission to be absent from the City Council Meeting of April 6,1998. (120.40) (CITY COUNCIL) APPROVED LETTER SUPPORTING CALIFORNIA COASTAL CONSERVANCY ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY AT PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY AND MAGNOLIA STREET -Approved the proposed attached letter of support to the California Coastal Conservancy for their acquisition of the property located at Pacific Coast Highway and Magnolia Street which has been designated as Coastal Conservation by the City of Huntington Beach and the California Coastal Commission and supporting an enhancement plan that will explore alternatives for different habitats. (120.70) (CITY COUNCIL) COMMENDATION TO PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT REGARDING WARNER AVENUE LANDSCAPING -Commended the Department of Public Works for the great job that is being accomplished on the landscaping on the medians on Warner Avenue through Measure M Funding. (120.70) The motion made by Green, second Garofalo to approve all above listed items carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Harman, Green, Dettloff, Bauer, Sullivan, Garofalo NOES: None ABSENT: Julien Page 28 - Council/Agency Minutes - 04/06/98 i (CITY COUNCIL)APPROVED FUNDS FOR HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK EQUESTRIAN EVENT SITE IMPROVEMENTS -AMENDMENT TO FISCAL YEAR 97/98 GENERAL FUND BUDGET - APPROVED RECOMMENDED ACTION AS AMENDED - FUNDS FOR j HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK EQUESTRIAN EVENT SITE IMPROVEMENTS (320.20) The City Council considered a communication from Community Services Director Hagan recommending approval of funds for Huntington Central Park Equestrian Event Site Improvements. Considerable discussion was held regarding various issues relating to the loan including whether other entities would request the same action of Council. Discussion was held regarding what would occur if the event is rained out or if the proceeds are not enough to cover the loan. 1 3 A motion was made by Green, to adopt Recommended Action No. 1 as follows: r } 1. Utilize the Park Acquisition and Development Fund to pay expenses that would again be . reimbursed by the net proceeds from the GTE Directory Summer Classic Equestrian Event. The motion failed due to a lack of a second. Jan Jankoviac, spoke in support of the recommended action and informed Council of the reasons why he believed this will be the best event ever, in that revenues will exceed $80,000 to $90,000. Following discussion, a motion was made by Harman, second Sullivan to approve the recommended action as follows with the exception that the funding be derived from the Park Acquisition and Development Fund: 1. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 97/98 Park Acquisition and Development Fund to allocate $80,000 into Account E-AA-CS-340-3-90-00 for improvements in Huntington Central Park and 2. Authorize staff to do the turf improvements at Huntington Central Park at a cost of not to exceed $80,000. (Communication dated March 30, 1998 received from the Huntington Beach Art Center Foundation agreeing that the city will be reimbursed the $80,000 before any funds are disbursed to the Art Center operation.) The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Harman, Green, Dettloff, Bauer, Sullivan, Garofalo NOES: None ABSENT: Julien 04/06/98 -City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes - Page 29 ADJOURNMENT - CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Mayor Dettloff adjourned the regular meetings of the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach at 12:50 a.m. to the adjourned regular meetings to be held on Monday April 13, 1998 at 5:00 p.m. in Room B-8, Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach and Clerk of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach, California ATTEST: City Clerk/Clerk Mayor/Chairman 1 T H E O R A N G 9 E C O U N T Y 1$ �� This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp 625 N. Grand Ave., Santa Ana, CA 92701 PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ) ss. County of Orange, ) Proof of Publication of I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of twenty NOTICE-•OF PUBLIC HEARING • one years, and not a party to or interested in the Coostdl DMI6prnen,Petrriit Nd, PUBLIC NOTICE 97'1 tiled on November n, above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the 1997 rn contunction with the above request. NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING I -- BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the'- printer of The Orange County g Re ister a "' •• CITY OF HUNTINGI'ON-BEACH Coastal-»Development Permit NOTICE IS HEREBY GNEN ft,:r/.i hgpdng consis'is of a staff report, Monday,April 6,1998, 7�D0 P n public hearing,City Council dis- newspaper of general circulation, published in the 'in the City Counc,,',,i ,.', s, actioncussio nthea above iteCity m p action on the above item maybe 2000 Maln Street;,.g6 -'rO.06 appealed to the Coastal Corn- ,Beach the City Councl;�i twld o mission within ten a(10)'working cityof Santa Ana, County of Orange, and which Item: hearng on aht•,',?tlowing days from the date of receipt of County s 'the notice of final City action by • iREVIEW OF PUBLIC WOWS COM-••the Coastal Commission pursuant newspaper has been adjudged to be a newspaper of MISSION DECISION ON-EDWARDS to Section 245.32 of the Hunting- STREET/TALBERT AVENUE IMPROVE. ton Beach Zoning and SubdMsion ,MENTSICOASTAL DEVELOPMENT !Ofdinance and Section-13110 of general circulation by the Superior Court of the !PERMIT NO. 97•31/MmGATED .the California Code of Regula- NEGATINE DECLARATION NO.97- tfons,-or unless Tile 14, Section 25 (EDWARDS STREET IMPROVE. 13573 of the California Adminls- CountCoun of Orange, State of California, under the MENTS): tative Code is applicable. The y ran g Appllcaro: C ly r.of Huntington 'Coastal Commission address Is Beach,Public Works Department ;South Coast Area Office, 200 date of November 19, 1905, Case No.A•21046 that RequGd:To widen Edwards Street .Oceangate, loth Floor.- Long between Ellis Avenue-and inlet,!Beach, CA 90802-4302,-phone ;Dave to its ultimate width per the number: (3101 570-507L the notice, of which the annexed is a true printed General Plan Circulation Element ON FILE:A copy the proposed and reduce.-,the south side of request is on file In 1he.Community Talbert Avenue between Edwards Development Department,2000, Street and Fieldbury Lane. Main Street, Huntington Beach, copy, has been published in each regular and entire 1Location: Edwads Sheet (seg- Cali/onto 92648, for inspection 17116nt north of ENIs Avenue and by the public._A copy of the staff j south of inlet Drive,-including inter- report will be available to Inter issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement (section of Talbert and Edwards) 'ested parties at City Hall or the and Talbert Avenue (segment Main City Library(7111 Talbert Ave- from Edwards Street to Fieldbury I nue)after April 2,-1998, thereof on the followingdates, to wit: project ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are in. lolo Planner. Catherine Wed to offend sold hearing and express opinions or submit evI- NOTICE 15_HEREBY GIVEN that an dense for or against the applk;a- Inillal environmental�assessment tion as outlined-above.-If you (Mitgated Neg�}Ive Declarallbn challenge the City Council's ac- MARCH 7 7 g$ No. 7-25)for the above item was ton in court,you may be limited fprocessed and completed in oc• to raising only those issues you or f cordance with the California Envi-'someone else raised at the public ronrrental Quality Act. It was -hearing described In this notice, determined that the above items, or In written correspondence de- wlth"mitiggation, would not have livered to the City at,-or piton to, any sign environmental ef- the public hearing. If there are fects and that a mitigated neegga• any further questions please call We declaration Is warranted.this the Planning Division at 536-5271 environmental assessment is on-ands refer to•the above Item.DI. file at the City of Huntington :rest your written conimuriications Beach_Community Development to the City Clerk. Department, a for public .S I' Connie Broclrnay City Clerk once Is available for blic I ton and comment by contacting City of Huntington;Beach the Community Development' 2000 Main Street 2nd Floor Department, or by telephoning' Huntingtori Beach, (714)-536-5271, California 92648 01 certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 1714)536-5227 above Item is located In the ap-',Publ�:Orange County Register under the laws of the State of California that the .ealabie Jurisdictlon of they March 27, 1996 Coastal Zone and Inclutles;3Q7000100 _ R-593 ' foregoing is true and correct": ,— — - Date APRTL 1 , 19_9s Signature PROOF F PUBLICATION e PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA) SS NOTICE IS tirs REBY County of Orange ) PUBLIC NOTICE. ,>, GIVEN that the CoaseM De- NOTICE OF velopment Permit hearing PUBLIC HEARINQ: con is h of a staff il BEFORE THE CITY %bile lon�and aclloe.CNy I am a Citizen of the United States and a COUNCIL Council action on the CITY OF- above item may be ap-, resident o f the County aforesaid; I a m HUNTINGTON BEACH pealed to rue Coastal Corm. NOTICE IS HEREBY mission within ten (10) over the age of eighteen years, and not a 'GIVEN that on Monday, workng days from the data !April 8,1998,at7-00 PM In of receipt of.the notice of the City Council Chambers, final action by the party to . or interested in the below 2000 Main Strest, Hunting CoaaW mission purse. ton Beach,the City Councl ant to Section Nli=of the entitled matter. I am a principal clerk o f will hold a public Bing Huntington Bomb zoning on the following Item: and Subdivision Ordinance the HUNTINGTON BEACH INDEPENDENT a REVIEW OF PUBLIC and Becton 13110 of rite WORKS COMMISSION DE Csl(forrds Code of Regula. CISION ON EDWARDS dons, or unless Title 14, newspa er of general circulation, printed ST EETITALBERTAVENUE Section 13573 of the Cell. IMPROVEMENTS/ and p u l i s h e d i n the City o f Huntington COASTAL DEVELOPMENT fornia Administration Code PERMIT NO.97-31/MITI- 'a applku<ba- The Coastal Beach, County o f Orange, State of GATED NEGATIVE DECLA- Commission addrese ,Is g RATION NO.97-25 (ED- South Coast Arsr 081ce, nd that attached Notice I$ a WARDS STREET IM. 20oOosengats,IftFloor, California,i PROVEMERM: Ap= Beady, CA l0802r true and complete copy as was printed °f Huntington Department P 7 �'o) and published in the Huntington Beach sme« r °N Fl`�` A es o me proms �on Ole Avenue gird Not Drive to in the Community De- and Fountain Valle issues of said 8e ultimate width per t,e �volopment Department, Y General Plan Circulation a 200o Main Street, Hunting- newspaper to wit the issue(s) of: ement and reduce the ton Beach, California south '" of Talbert Av- 92849, for Inspection by enue between Edwards the public. A copy of the Stred and Fleldbury Lane. staff report will be evallable Location: Edwards Street to Mterested parties at (segment north of Ellis A- Hall or the Main City Lf. emus and south Of Inlet = (7111 Talbert Av-1 of Tolbert Edwards )after April 2,1998. April 2 , 1998 and Talbert Avenue (beg- SONS are Invittedd too aESTED new MGM from Edward@ Street said hearing and express to Fleldb ) Project opinions or submit evi- PWmw.Catharine O'Hara donee for or against-the NOTICE IS HEREBY application as outlined GIVEN that an Initial envi- above.If you challenge the rommentai a$seeslfherrt(MIt- City Council's action In I declare under penalty a l t ofperjury, that igaded N Dedaradon court, U may be limited p Y it�o. 97.2 the above to raising only those Mum the foregoing is true and correct. � was p and roll er someone. else b b completed In Woo raised at the public hearing with the CailMornia Envl- described in this notice,or Conn ntal Quality AOL It In written correspondence was determined that the delivered to the City at or above kerns, with mlMW dor to,the public hearing. Executed on A or i l 2 , 1998—�. till", not have any are any further sipnlflcant environmental on" psaes call the at Costa Mesa, California. erfeCta and that a mitigated Ing Division at W& negative dedaratiort Is war and refer to the ranted. This envtrorhmental above Item. Direct your assesanord Is on file at the written commuNcsdons to City of Huntington Beach the City Clerk. Community Development Connls Brnok"71 Department, 2000 MaMin City Clerk,Cltg of Man. Street, and Is available for tington Bosch. 20M public Inspection and com- mom strM#, Floor, ment by contacting the Hrsn CN- Community Development Depeunntrppra((77r t,))or tale- Ronnie r r t7F4) NOTICEf413 HEREBY PPuubI „sect 1-10m ington Signature GIVEN that the above item Beach-Fountain Valley In- is located In the appealeba dependsnd April 2,1908 ui rls�lcton of rue Coastal z�onnee and Inductee Coastal Development Permit No. 97-31, filed on November 17, 1997 in conjunction with the a"request. • CITY OF HUNTINGTON 13 6H 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CONNIE BROCKWAY CITY CLERK NOTICE OF ACTION COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 97-31 APPEALABLE DEVELOPMENT Applicant: City of Huntington Beach Public Works Department Request: To Widen Edwards Street between Ellis Avenue and Inlet Drive to its ultimate width per the General Plan Circulation Element and reduce the south side of Talbert Avenue between Edwards Street and Fieldbury Lane. Location: Edwards Street (segment north of Ellis Avenue and south of Inlet Drive, including intersection of Talbert and Edwards) and Talbert Avenue (segment from Edwards Street to Fieldbury Lane.) Date Of Approval: April 6, 1998 Your application was acted upon by the Huntington Beach City Council on April 6, 1998 and your request was: Approved X Conditionally Approved �\ Denied Withdrawn Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Zoning & Subdivision Ordinance Code, the action taken by the City Council is final. Approval of this development is appealable , 1 to the Coastal Commission'-pursuant to PRC S.30603. City Council action on the above item may be appealed to the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days from the date of receipt of the notice of final City action by the Coastal Commission pursuant to Section 245.32 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and Section �r 13110'of the California Code of Regulations. The Coastal Commission address is South 011 Coast Area Office, 200 Oceangate, 10th Floor„Long Beach, California Q� 9080274302. A denial may be appealed (S.13319, Title 14, California Administrative Code) only if the City has approved a development on the basis of local land use regulations but has denied the issuance of a coastal development permit because it cannot make the findings required by Section 13311, Title 14 of the California Administrative Code. g:followup:misc/Notice.doc (Telephone:714-536-5227) - r Notice of Action Coastal Development Permit No. 97-31 Page Two Pursuant to PRC S.30603, an appeal by an aggrieved person must be filed in writing, and addressed to: California Coastal Commission South Coast Area Office 200 Oceangate, 10th Floor Long Beach, California 90801-4302 (562) 590-5071 The appeal period begins when the Commission receives this notice of action and continues for ten (10) working days. Applicants will be notified by the Coastal Commission as to whether or not an appeal has been filed. Applicants are advised not to begin construction prior to that date. Provisions of the Huntington Beach Zoning & Subdivision are such that an application becomes null and void one (1) year after the final approval, unless actual construction has begun. e�f� Connie Brockway City Clerk Attachments: Findings & Conditions (Attachment No. 2) Item As Printed In Council Agenda Packet Communications (Jerry Buchanan, Assistant Superintendent Administrative Services, Huntington Beach City School District, Mrs. Smith, Martin and Denise Menichiello, Gordon M. Watson, President Country View Estates Homeowners Association, Mrs. Hollander, Daryl Smith, Acting Public Works Director, City of Huntington Beach, John Fisher and Mrs. Reed). Legal Notice Publications Mailing Labels Statement Of.Council Action &followup:misc/Notice.doc - ATTACHMENT NO. 2 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL FOR NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO 97-25: 1. The Negative Declaration No. 97-25 has been prepared in compliance with Article 6 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. It was advertised and available for a public comment period of twenty (20)days. Any comments received during the comment period were considered by the City Council prior to action on the Negative Declaration and Coastal Development Permit No. 97-31. 2. Mitigation measures, incorporated into the conditions of approval, avoid or reduce the project's effects to a point where clearly no significant effect on the environment will occur. 3. There is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the City Council that the project, as mitigated through the conditions of approval for Coastal Development Permit No. 97-31 will have a significant effect on the environment. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 97-31: 1. Coastal Development Permit No. 97-31 for the Edwards Street improvement project, as proposed or as modified by conditions of approval, conforms with the General Plan, including the Local Coastal Program. The street improvement program is consistent with and implements the City's General Plan Circulation Element by widening Edwards Street to its ultimate width and constructing the associated improvements of curb, gutter, sidewalk, etc. 2. The project is consistent with the requirements of the CZ Overlay District, the base zoning district, as well as other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. The project is consistent with City standards for,street improvements. 3. At the time of occupancy the proposed development can be provided with infrastructure in a manner that is consistent with the Local Coastal Program. This project will implement the City's Local Coastal Program by improving the street system in the vicinity of coastal resources. All necessary infrastructure will be provided. 4. The development conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. The project will increase public access opportunities by fully improving Edwards Street between Inlet and Ellis and by installing sidewalk along both sides of the street. Attachment No. 2 Page 1 of 4 RECEIVED CITY CLERK MARTIN & DENISE MENICHIELLO CITY Of 6591 HORSESHOE LANE HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92648 1q98 APB -3 A 10, 0 5 APRIL 2, 1998 DEAR CITY COUNCIL OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, A FEW WEEKS BACK I HEARD ABOUT THE PROSPECT OF A TRAFFIC SIGNAL BEING INSTALLED "SOMEWHERE BY TALBERT AND EDWARDS". I ASSUMED THE ONLY POSSIBLE LOCATION WOULD BE TO REPLACE THE STOP SIGN AT VARSITY AND EDWARDS. ALTHOUGH 1 DIDN'T SEE THE NECESSITY AND WOULD RATHER CONTINUE WITH IT AS A STOP SIGN, THE IDEA WAS CONCEIVABLE. NOW I FIND OUT THE PROPOSED SIGNAL IS FOR THE BOTTOM OF EDWARDS HILL. I AM FLOORED! HOW COULD THIS EVEN BE POSSIBLE? CARS WILL BE LINED UP THE HILL ON A RED LIGHT. THE POSSIBILITY OF CARS ROLLING AND REAR-ENDING OTHER CARS IS TREMENDOUS. HOW ABOUT THE UNKNOWING DRIVER COMING OFF THE HILL ONLY TO HAVE A SHORT DISTANCE TO STOP. IF WARNING SIGNS WITH FLASHING LIGHTS ARE POSTED JUST AFTER THE ELLIS AND EDWARDS STOP, HOW COMMERCIAL AND-ECSTATICALLY UNPLEASING IS THAT TO THIS RURAL AREA. I ALSO SEE PROBLEMS WITH THE CARS HEADING UP EDWARDS HILL. SMALLER ENGINED CARS NEED THAT SHORT "RUNNING START" FROM VARSITY TO GAIN THE MOMENTUM NEEDED TO GETUP THE HILL. GOING FROM A DEAD STOP AT THE BOTTOM OF THE HILL WILL PRESENT PROBLEMS. OUR LITTLE RURAL CORNER OF HUNTINGTON BEACH IS BEING CHIPPED AWAY AT. I REALIZE THAT WITH MORE HOMES WE HAVE TO EXPECT SOME DEPLETION OF THE NATURAL SURROUNDINGS WE HAVE ENJOYED. BUT ADDING MORE LIGHTS AND SIGNALS WILL NOT ONLY BE HAZARDOUS, BUT WILL ADD TO THE "CONCRETE JUNGLE" WE MOVED UP HERE TO GET AWAY FROM. S CERELY, MARTIN A EN1SE NICHIELLO - Apr 03 98 04: 32p Aon Watson -0-847-5562 p. 2 RECE1`I E0 CITY CI K CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH.CA Igla APR -3 P L- 30 April 3, 1998 Connie Brockway City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street,2"d Floor Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Refer: City Council Meeting Agenda,April 6, 1998 Dear Huntington Beach City Council: The purpose of this letter is to make known to the City Council the position of the Country View Estates Homeowner's Association(CVEHOA)with respect to the proposed traffic light at the intersection of Edward Street and Talbert Avenue(i.e.at the bottom of "Edwards Hill"). The CVEHOA Board of Directors have met and considered this matter in some detail. As a group of homeowners that use this roadway extensively,we are unanimous in our opposition to the recommendation by the Public Works Commission that a full traffic signal at this location will materially improve the road safety in this area of our city. We support the"Turning Movement Study"by the Public Works Staff and the recommendations by the City Police and City Fire Departments, all of which state that such a signal is unnecessary and not in the best safety interest of the community. We also ask the City Council to apply common sense and consider the negative ramifications of placing a signal at the bottom of a poorly lit,3-way, narrow,dogleged,blind hill intersection. Thank you for your consideration in this important matter. Sincerely, Gordon M.Watson President, CVEHOA Tod 114V2E T 86-60-t'0 Attn: Connie Brockway City Clerk From: Sherrey Hollander Huntington Beach Resident I want to voice my opinion regarding the issue of the traffic signal at the corners of Edwards and Talbert Streets at Monday's City Council Meeting, however I will not be able to attend in person that evening. I am very much opposed to any type of traffic signal at that corner for several reasons, safety and lack of necessity being two of them. I went over in great detail the turning movement study conducted by Public Works and was amazed at the low number of left hand turns from Talbert onto Northbound Edwards that were actually made in comparison to the number of right hand turns onto Edwards. Numerous residents expressed fears of 17000's of additional cars being diverted into their neighborhood streets if left hand turns from Talbert were eliminated. These fears are based on inaccurate figures and have given many residents a false impression of the number of cars truly involved. I live in that neighborhood which would be subjected to the additional traffic but after really looking at the true figures involved, they are not enough to warrant the signal in lieu of eliminating the left hand turn lane. Of even greater concern is that of safety. The intersection has very few accidents now but if a signal was to be installed you would have those running the red lights to keep their momentum both up and down the hill. Bicyclists will not stop at the signal as they also need the speed to go up the hill and have too much speed coming down the hill. (I have done this hill many times and have found this to be the case. I come down the hill with my brakes fully applied and it is still near impossible to stop.) I ask you to please consider my comments in reviewing your final decision and vote for "NO TRAFFIC SIQNAL"at the intersection of Talbert and Edwards. Use the facts when making your decision and make it in the best interest of the entire community. Thank you, Mrs. Hollander Z -b `d 9- 8dV $bbl d3'HOV39 miJIdaNnH J0 A113 K21330 1�110 03h1303H , - z Td WdOS:60 666T 20 'add 'ON 3NOHd WM:u ;, CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 April 3, 1998 Huntington Beach City School District 20451 Craimer Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attention: Mr. Jerry Buchanan Assistant Superintendent Subject: Edwards Street, Street Improvements --1; Vn -<c� Cr 03 O rn rn Dear Jerry: -�� In response to your letter dated March 18, 1998, we have reviewed your issue regarding sclsool.uses traveling on Edwards Street up the hill to Ellis Avenue. We do not anticipate any problems wo the school buses impeding the flow of traffic on Edwards since the street will be widened to ift8lude two lanes in each direction. The school buses will be-able to travel in the number 2 lane, (or the right lane). All other vehicles traveling up the hill will be able to pass the school bus in the number 1 lane, (or the left lane). To review the overall project, Edwards Street grade will be reduced from 12% to 8.8%; the street wil be widened to two lanes in each direction with a raised median; it will also have marked bike lanes; and street lighting. The project also includes installing two traffic signals, one at the intersection of Edwards Street at Ellis Avenue and the second is being reviewed by the City Council on April 6, 1998, at the intersection of Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue. The traffic signal at Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue will primarily rest in green for Edwards Street and will only be stopped if there is a vehicle on Talbert Avenue waiting to turn left onto northbound Edwards or right onto southbound Edwards, (this movement will be delayed due to the dedicated right turn lane). If you have any questions regarding the above subject, please call Terri Elliott at (714) 536-5580. Sincerely, d Daryl mith Acting Director of Public Works cc: City Council Ray Silver, City Administrator Robert Eichblatt, City Engineer Z :I I V q- 8dV 8bb1 David Webb, Acting Deputy City Engineer Tom Brohard, Traffic Engineer y3'H3`d38 N019NUNnH Terri Elliott, Associate Civil Engineer 30 'kil3 Mary Beth Broeren, Senior Planner N8313 A1.13 • Q3Ri3 38' 4-0271998 1 :01PM FROM COOK/FISHER 714 841 4484 P. 1 ° RECEIVED John Fisher CITY CLERK CITY OF 6692 Shetland Circle HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA Huntington Beach, CA 92648 P �: IN APR -201 April 2, 1998 Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Re: April 6 Agenda Item # D2 Dear HB City Council: I strongly urge you to reject the placement of a traffic signal. at Talbert and Edwards. Ten years ago, my son was among the first students bused from the Ellis/Goldenwest quartersection and after his first day of school he reported to us that the school bus was forced to back down Edwards Hill after making the right turn from Talbert because it lacked enough power to make it tip the hill. Subsequently, the school district was forced to reroute the buses to Varsity. Obviously, a traffic signal would create a dangerous situation for many underpowered vehicles (including fire trucks) increasing the risk of rear-end collisions. The solution is to place the light at Varsity where a stop sign already exists. This would allow breaks in traffic such that cars could more easily complete turns off of Talbert. Sincerely, 94 �'hn Fisher FROM QUANTUM SALES PHONE NO. : 714 847 8160 Apr. 02 1999 02:39PM P1 vov >Coatte 4L")CI -- r m d o Cam. Cam.^--ee�D r4� . Ao r �Jb`=4 3� s 1 • c. � ��.r�• ark, r� rS 'Ch�ff*ai 1 40 rye- T`�'G rr-e to Q �,• 1^� &lre&J .ram . e u� ram, ("`:r �.r�1 S .p 1� - 04-02-90 05: '26PM POI FROM QUANTUM SALES PHONE NO. : 714 847 9160 Apr. 02 1999 02:39PM P2 U•C� 4s C C) A or 4-,5 Aro r e-- �1 k- CA. +At. A6 h coeoc-,> r 1 (,At , Cry A00 • 1 `1 5 � � C/o's-'ReE D c.:�: 04-02-93 05. 26Pn4 Y02 F�.Qrl.:',QUANTUM SALES PHC Ni�, '14 847 815E Apr. 82 1898 03:L3Rl P1 Post-it' Fax Nate f ► r,� t From Co.%Dept o Phone 01 Phone 0 t r FAX FROM; Faxa , ' Fox" CONNIE®ROCf4WAY, CITY CLERK ° CITY CLERK'S OFFICE °� �' CI7Y OF HUNTING70N BEACH • P 0 Box 190/ 000 Main Street Huntington Basch, CA 92648 MUfV�`IhlCT+C��d BEACH (l94) 53�-52�7 (714) 374.1657 FAX Date: Number of Pages (including cover a e : To: By: i Clerk Fax Ri'{to>~1a: Rema is f 9Rt 'I Uass commsrt per our muart Pd c&U E 1Jq U�' ,¢}�. 1' '` /�a► f n �"/�Mr�e.��a o-l� �``g'��`� �Qu�'�• /' �reo�w • ..ram ,� ,,�/' a«E, dU yCuv� uh'i �/3'l1G�v �lQr► 7'� i..,rnJwa. 4, http://wwu,.Ci.huntiangton-beach.ca.us � OR http://www.hbsurfeity,conVolerk 04-ii- ='14 Poi REQUEST FOR ACT1O19 MEETING DATE: April 6, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER:PW 98-031 Attachment(s): . City Clerk's Page Number No. Description 1 Location Map 2 Findings and Conditions of Approval for Coastal Development Permit No. 97-31/Negative Declaration No. 97-25 3 Letter Requesting Review from Bart J. Hollander dated March 9, 1998 . . _ 4 Negative Declaration No. 97-25 5 Turning Movement Counts . 6 PLC Letter dated March 13, 1998, Construction Schedule 7 Public Works Commission, Request for Action, dated February 18, 1998 and January 21, 1998 RCA Author: TAE 0030589.02 -6- 03/25/98 8:24 AM Attachment No. 1 ldlbk low SLATER AVE. v7 bi c� cn Li Of � o_ w l o O CD T \ � NLET D J F HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK "UN " PROJECT SITE ELLIS AVE. U W GI N [9 V O Z � O Q O Q W zz � z D7 z � OF = a OF Ln .l2 a VO� NOT TO SCALE _ 0 > w --� GARFIELD AVE. o 0 [PlotStamp Eval] G:\ACAD\KRIEGER\EDWHIL! LOCATDON MAP ri CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS gxv �17M.- ATTACHMENT NO. 2 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL FOR NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO 97-25: 1. The Negative Declaration No. 97-25 has been prepared in compliance with Article 6 of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) Guidelines. It was advertised and available for a public comment period of twenty (20) days. Any comments received during the comment period were considered by the City Council prior to action on the Negative Declaration and Coastal Development Permit No. 97-31. 2. Mitigation measures, incorporated into the conditions of approval, avoid or reduce the project's effects to a point where clearly no significant effect on the environment will occur. 3. There is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the City Council that the project, as mitigated through the conditions of approval for Coastal Development Permit No. 97-31 will have a significant effect on the environment. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 97-31: 1. Coastal Development Permit No. 97-31 for the Edwards Street improvement project, as proposed or as modified by conditions of approval, conforms with the General Plan, including the Local Coastal Program. The street improvement program is consistent with and implements the City's General Plan Circulation Element by widening Edwards Street to its ultimate width and constructing the associated improvements of curb, gutter, sidewalk, etc. 2. The project is consistent with the requirements of the CZ Overlay District,the base zoning district, as well as other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. The project is consistent with City standards for:street improvements. 3. At the time of occupancy the proposed development can be provided with infrastructure in a manner that is consistent with the Local Coastal Program. This project will implement the City's Local Coastal Program by improving the street system in the vicinity of coastal resources. All necessary infrastructure will be provided. 4. The development conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. The project will increase public access opportunities by fully improving Edwards Street between Inlet and Ellis and by installing sidewalk along both sides of the street. Attachment No. 2 Page 1 of 4 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL-COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 97-31: 1. The site plan received and dated February 27, 1998 shall be the conceptually approved layout. 2. A Grading Plan, prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted for review and approval prior to issuance of a grading permit. 3. Prior to issuance of grading permits,the Public Works Department shall: a. Prepare a drainage and erosion control plan for construction of the project. The plan shall include measures such as the following: • Diversion of off-site runoff away from the construction site; • Prompt revegetation of proposed landscape areas; • Perimeter sandbagging or temporary basins to trap sediment; and • Regular sprinkling of exposed soils during construction phases to minimize fugitive dust. ' b. Ensure that all grading and construction vehicles and equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped and maintained with effective muffler systems that use state of the art noise attenuation and that stockpiling and/or vehicle staging areas shall be located as far as practicable from sensitive noise receptors. c. Be responsible for the incorporation of measures to reduce construction related traffic congestion. Measures shall include: • Provision of rideshare incentives. • Provision of transit incentives for construction personnel. • Configuration of construction parking to minimize traffic interference. • Measures to minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes. • Use of a flagman to guide traffic when deemed necessary. d. Develop a truck and construction vehicle routing plan. This plan shall specify the hours in which transport activities can occur and methods to minimize construction related impacts to adjacent residents. e. Be responsible for assuring that construction vehicles are equipped with proper emission control equipment to substantially reduce emissions. 4. Landscape architectural plans shall be submitted to the Public Works Division Landscape Architect and approved prior to construction of project. Installation shall be in accordance with the Arboricultural and Landscape Standards and Specifications,the"Greenbook" for Public Works construction projects and the inspector's discretion. Attachment No. 2 Page 2 of 4 0 0 5. Prior to initiation of grading activities,the applicant shall comply with the following: a. Notify the City of Huntington Beach Fire and Police Departments of the duration and the extent of any street lane closures a minimum of 24-hours so that they can identify alternative emergency routes for the duration of the street closures, if necessary b. Contact all utility providers and identify the location of existing utility lines within the subject public rights-of way. The applicant shall notify the companies of trenching activities so that impacts to existing line and disruptions to existing service can be avoided. 6. A minimum of 10 days prior to start of construction activity, the Public Works Department shall: a. Post construction signs indicating the nature of construction, its expected duration and provide a contact name and phone number for the project. b. Submit to the Fire and Police Departments a traffic circulation plan identifying the routes which equipment and trucks will use to access and depart from the area. The plan shall use routes which ' will generate the minimum number of circulation conflicts with residential,pedestrian,bicycle and vehicle traffic. 7. During grading and construction, the Public Works Department shall: a. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems in all areas where vehicles travel to keep damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site; b. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day; c. Use low sulfur fuel (0.5%)by weight for construction equipment; d. Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days first stage smog alerts); e. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts. f. Be responsible for assuring that vehicle movement on any unpaved surface other than water trucks shall be terminated if wind speeds exceed 15 miles per hour. 8. A certified archeologist shall monitor the site during grading. In the event that significant cultural, paleontologic or archeological sites are unearthed, grading shall cease until proper documenting in accordance with EIR 89-1 and SRS 977 has been accomplished and, if necessary,proper re-burial in accordance with SRS 977 has been undertaken. 9. Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be completed prior to final inspection/within 12 months. Attachment No. 2 Page 3 of 4 • • 10. A separate water meter and backflow prevention device shall be provided for the irrigation system. 11. The Public Works Department shall ensure the standards regarding pedestrian (including ADA) and bicycle safety along the perimeter sidewalks have been met. 12. Landscaping shall be provided in accordance with the adopted Holly Seacliff Specific Plan for Edwards Street and in accordance with the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance for Talbert Avenue. 13. Mitigation measures 5 -10, Page 63, from EIR 89-1 regarding Paleontological Resources shall be adhered to as appropriate. 14. All building spoils such as unusable lumber, wire,pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. Coastal Development Permit No. 97-3 1/Negative Declaration No. 97-25 shall not become effective until the ten day appeal period has elapsed. 2. Coastal Development Permit No. 97-3 1/Negative Declaration No. 97-25 shall become null and void unless exercised within one year of the date of final approval or such extension of time as may be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Department of Community Development a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. 3. The City Council reserves the right to revoke Coastal Development Permit No. 97-3 1/Negative Declaration No. 97-25,pursuant to a public hearing for revocation, if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance or Municipal Code occurs. F 4. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, Building Division, and Fire Department as well as applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards, except as noted herein. 5. Construction shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. 6. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of$38.00 for the posting of the Notice of ExemptionlDetermination at the County of Orange Clerk's Office. The check shall be made out to the County of Orange and submitted to the Department of Community Development within two (2) days of the City Council's action. Attachment No. 2 Page 4 of 4 Attachment No. 3 0 A V2 / y% Bart J. Hollander 18152 Lakepoint Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92647 R E C E I V E D Home: 714/848-7890 DEPT.OF PUBLIC WORKS Office: 310/638-2842 MAR 13 1998 Huntington Beach City Council HUNTINGTON BEACH, C_ Huntington Beach City Hall 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 March 9, 1998 Dear City Council Members: At the Huntington Beach City Council Meeting on March 2, 1998 I spoke during the Public Comments portion of the Agenda and presented my views against the traffic signal ' that was approved by the Public Works Commission for the intersection of Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue. At the conclusion of my presentation I was asked by the Council to reiterate my position in a letter,which I am now submitting for your review. Background on this issue begins with the Public Works Commission Meeting on January 21;1998 in which the Commission presented its plan for road improvements between His Avenue and Inlet Drive. The proposed improvements included widening Edwards Street from two lanes to four(Edwards is presently four lanes in its entirety except for this section),lowering the grade on Edwards hill by approximately two degrees, and eliminating the left-hand turn from eastbound Talbert Ave. to northbound Edwards St. Current traffic control at the intersection consists of a stop sign for eastbound traffic on Talbert and a turn-in lane for northbound Edwards traffic onto westbound Talbert. I believe that the Commission's rationale for the elimination of the left turn was concern over increased traffic occurring on Edward's Street due to the Holly-Seacliff development south of Garfield Ave. At this meeting a number of homeowners,of which I was one,voiced their disapproval for the elimination of the Talbert/Edwards left-turn. Reasons for the disapproval primarily centered on residents' concerns over the diversion of traffic onto Varsity Drive and Fieldbury Lane that would result from this elimination. Additionally,there was . concern over increased speeds on Edwards hill that may result from the improvements, especially with the intersections of Inlet/Edwards and Varsity/Edwards used-as pedestrian crossing points to Central Park on the east side of Edwards. Unspoken was the desire to avoid the loss of this turning option at the intersection. Also,a number of vocal residents,of which I was not one,expressed their desire to have a full traffic signal installed at the Talbert/Edwards intersection as a means of retaining their left-turn. The Commission promised to further study the issue and present alternatives at the next meeting. Huntington*ch City Council � ry Page 2 The next Public Works Meeting took place on February 18, 1998. At that meeting,the Commission's recommended action was the installation of a traffic signal (Full-Signal)at the Edwards/Talbert intersection at a cost of$135,000. This proposal would include installation of a flashing signal for northbound traffic on Edwards to warn them of the approaching signal at the bottom of the hill and the lowering of the current 45 mph speed limit on the hill to 40 mph. The two other alternative actions considered were installation of a"Half-Signal"at Edwards/Talbert and an"All-Way Stop"at the intersection. Remarkably, alternatives not even considered included the Commission's original proposal for elimination of the left- turn or even a proposal to leave the intersection"As-is". Prior to Staffs review of the alternatives and overview of a traffic study conducted as research for the proposed alternatives, a number of residents again spoke their opinions to the Commission,both in favor and against the installation of the traffic signal. At the conclusion of public comments and the staff review,the Commission discussed.the recommended action and voted for its approval. It seemed obvious that approval of the ' recommended action was a foregone conclusion,as very little if anything was said regarding alternative actions or residents' concerns regarding the signal installation. My concern is that the Commission may have been shell-shocked over the negative response at the previous meeting and acted without thoroughly considering the research. As I stated earlier,elimination of the left-turn is the key issue. Residents don't want to be inconvenienced and they don't want additional traffic on alternative routes that may impact residential neighborhoods. There is no question that elimination of the left-tum will add traffic somewhere. It has to because a route will be eliminated. The question is how much increased traffic will the alternative routes receive. The vocal residents expressing traffic concerns resided on Fieldbury Lane and Varsity Drive. A look at a map(I have enclosed two maps for your convenience)reveals that Varsity would no doubt receive a substantial percentage of the diverted traffic. However, Varsity is a street that has no homes fronting it and should not be considered a residential street in the strictest of terms. Contrary to Fieldbury residents' concerns,this street would not'receive anything more than a token amount of additional traffic. It is just not logical for Talbert traffic to divert onto the residential streets of Fieldbury, Glenfox, Lakepoint and Inlet in order to make a left-tum onto Edwards. Varsity is a much easier alternative for virtually all traffic. As an additional point not mentioned at all,however, is that Springdale Street would likely relieve some of the traffic that originates to its west. In summary,the issue boils down to in the event of the left-turn being eliminated at Edwards/Talbert,how much additional traffic would be diverted to Varsity and is this increased traffic even a true residential concern? To shed light on this issue,I refer to the Turning Movement Study prepared by Staff as part of its research. This study measured traffic movements on the dates indicated during Huntington Bon City Council • Page 3 the hours of 6:00-8:00 am, 11:30-1:30 pm and 4:00-7:00 pm at three potentially impacted intersections: • Edwards Street/Talbert Avenue (February 5, 1998) • Edwards Street/Varsity Drive (February 11, 1998) • Edwards Street/Irilet Drive (February 12, 1998) Although traffic was measured in all directions,the only traffic relevant is the eastbound traffic onto Edwards Street, as this is the only traffic that would be impacted. The results are as follows: Right Thru Left Total Eastbound Talbert/North Edwards: 1,351 (87%) NA 194(13%) 1,545 Eastbound Varsity/North Edwards: 93 (22%) 40(10%) 286(68%) 419 Eastbound Inlet/North Edwards: 59 (50%) 7(6%) 52(44%) 118 What this study shows is that during these peak usage hours,only 1941eft-turns were made at the Talbert/Edwards intersection out of a total of 1,545 turns. Also,the left-tum traffic at Varsity, which already has a 4-way stop sign that was petitioned for by the residents, outnumbers the left-tum traffic at Talbert. Since the left-tum traffic on Talbert is the only traffic that would divert,the potential for increased traffic on Varsity is clearly not a startling amount and not an amount that I believe should warrant the installation of a traffic signal. This traffic issue aside,I would like to again refer to the other two alternatives proposed by.Staff—a"Half-Signal"and an"All-Way Stop". Reasons why staff concluded that the Half-Signal proposal was not warranted were not given,but the reason for the All-Way Stop was. This reason was that this intersection has not had enough accidents to warrant an All-Way Stop. It states that the intersection has had only one accident in the last twelve months and an intersection needs at least five in order to warrant an All-Way Stop. It also states the accident was not of a type that would have even been corrected by an all way stop. In effect,the report is stating that the intersection is too safe to warrant this option. With that in mind,I find it hard to understand how a Full-Signal can be warranted when an All-Way Stop is not. For these reasons,I believe that the installation of a Full-Signal is not warranted and the Commission's original proposal to eliminate the left-turn at Talbert/Edwards-is clearly preferable. However,I further believe that there is an alternative that is preferable to either of these alternatives and is additionally an alternative that would be agreeable to virtually all parties. That alternative would be to leave the current traffic control at the intersection unchanged. - Huntington BIth City Council Is Page 4 My arguments for this alternative are as follows: 1. Although all residents are safety conscious and concerned with speed generated on the downhill portion of Edwards,the intersection is currently a safe intersection,in fact so safe that it does not meet requirement standards for an All-Way Stop. 2. The intersection will become even safer following the road improvements. The lowering of the grade of Edwards hill by approximately two degrees in conjunction with the reduced speed limit from 45 mph to 40 mph will add safety to all traffic. 3. The installation of a traffic signal would increase risk to the intersection by forcing stops on what will still be a relatively steep grade and encouraging southbound traffic to speed up in order to"beat the signal"before making the drive up the hill. The Commission acknowledges the added risk with its direction to add a flashing beacon on Edwards to warn traffic of the approaching signal. 4. In the future,if traffic on Edwards ever did increase to the point where risk was increased for a left-turn from Talbert to Edwards,a protected turn-in lane could be ' added on Edwards Street. I appreciate the City Council's time in reviewing my request to change the Public Works Commission's direction to add a Full-Signal at the Talbert/Edwards intersection. I believe that my proposal is a more sensible solution and would be acceptable to all residents. I would welcome the opportunity to discuss this issue further with either the Public Works Commission or the City Council. Please advise me of the outcome of my request or any additional steps involved in the review process. Very truly yours, Bart I Hollander cc: Daryl Smith,Acting Director of Public Works Enclosures Attachment No. 4 . ...... . .... ............... ... ......... .................. 11 ......... 1 PROJECT TITLE: EDWARDS STREET FULL RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENTS AND TALBERT AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS Concurrent Entitlements: Coastal Development Permit No. 97-31 2. LEAD AGENCY: City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Contact: Catherine O'Hara, Project Planner Phone: (714) 536-5271 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Edwards Street(Segment north of Ellis Avenue and South of Inlet Drive, including intersection of Talbert and Edwards) and Talbert Avenue (segment from Edwards to Fieldbury Lane). 4. PROJECT PROPONENT: City of Huntington Beach Department of Public Works 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Contact: Terri Elliott Phone: (714) 536-5580 5. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Public Right-of-way with the designations of RL-7 (Low Density Residential) and OS-P (Open Space Park). 6. ZONING: Public right-of-way with the zoning designation of RL (Low Density Residential)and RL-CZ (Low Density Residential/Coastal Zone) on the west side of Edwards Street and OS-PR-O (Open Space Parks and Recreation Subdistrict/Oil Overlay) on the east side of Edwards; RL CZ on the south side of Talbert Avenue. 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This environmental assessment analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed widening of Edwards Street between Ellis Avenue and Inlet Drive to its ultimate width per the General Plan Circulation Element and the reduction of the south side of Talbert Avenue between Edwards Street and Fieldbury Lane. Proposed street improvements in conjunction with Edwards Street construction include widening the existing street area from its current two lane, 40 foot configuration,to four lanes with a width of 80 feet,plus two foot wide transition area on both sides. The existing grade of the road will be reduced from approximately 12 percent to a maximum grade of 8.8 percent to design for a safer driving condition. Improvements include new curbs, gutters and sidewalks along Edwards and at the comer of Talbert Avenue and Edwards; at grade north and south bound bike lanes; a twelve inch raised, landscaped median and parkway; new street lighting; drainage improvements; the relocation of existing above ground electric utilities to points further west from where they currently exist,placing underground existing 12 kv electrical lines;the relocation of an existing under ground Southern California Edison fuel line, and the installation of a wildlife corridor/passageway under Edwards Street. (See Attachment 5). Proposed street improvements in conjunction with Talbert Avenue construction include transitioning the south side of Talbert from an 80 foot right-of-way to a total curb to curb width of 40 feet, curb, gutter and sidewalk. Two alternatives are analyzed for the intersection of Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue: Alternative 1 - This alternative includes the consruction of a traffic signal at the intersection and a crosswalk across Talbert Avenue on the west side and across Edwards Street on the north side. Left turns will be maintained for both northbound Ewards Street to west bound Talbert Avenue and eastbound Talbert Avenue to northbound Edwards Street.. The crosswalk on Ewards Street at inlet Drive will be removed. A flashing beacon will be installed on Edwards Street north of Ellis Avenue to alert northbound vehicles of upcoming signal. The signals and beacon will be wired to permit emergency pre-emption for the proposed fire station on Edwards Street approximately 300 feet south of Ellis Avenue. Alternative 2 - This alternative does not include a traffic signal at the intersection of Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue. Left turns from eastbound Talbert Avenue northbound Edwards Street would be prohibited. The left turning traffic would instead use Varsity Avenue. Construction is anticipated to last approximately 120 days: Related Environmental Documentation The proposed street improvements are consistent with the City's adopted Circulation Element and Holly Seacliff Specific Plan, Development Agreement and Environmental Impact Report(EIR)No. 89-1. The proposed improvements will bring the subject street portion into conformance with the City's Circulation Plan where it is designated as a Primary Arterial. The improvements will also serve to help mitigate traffic impacts projected to be generated by build out of the adopted Holly Seacliff Specific Plan as identified in EIR No. 89-1. Environmental Assessment No. 97-25 analyzes the project specific and potential cumulative impacts of the proposed Edwards Street widening and is consistent with the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan EIR 89-1 mitigation and monitoring plan. This EA document identifies applicable conditions of approval and mitigation measures(Attachments 3 and 4)to ensure that all potential impacts from the proposed Edwards Street widening are reduced to a level less than significant. 8. OTHER AGENCIES WHOSE APPROVAL IS REQUIRED (AND PERMITS NEEDED): N/A Environmental Assessment No.97-25 Page 2 of 20 I O I ENVIRONMENTAL FACT POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a"Potentially Significant Impact"or is "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated," as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Land Use&Planning ❑ Transportation/Circulation ❑ Public Services ❑ Population&Housing ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Utilities& Service Systems ❑ Geological Problems ❑ Energy&Mineral ❑ Aesthetics Resources ❑ Water ❑ Hazards ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Air Quality ❑ Noise ❑ Recreation ❑ ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be Q prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment,and an ❑ ENVIRONMENTAL EVIPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s)on the environment,but that at least one effect(1)has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and(2)has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a"potentially significant impact"or is"potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required,but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ Signature Date Catherine O'Hara Planner Printed Name Title Environmental Assessment No. 97-25 Page 3 of 20 EVALUATION OF ENVIROIENTAL IMPACTS: 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except"No Impact"answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A"No Impact"answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to the project. A"No Impact"answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards. 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved. Answers should address off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3. "Potentially Significant Impact"is appropriate, if an effect is significant or potentially significant, or if the lead agency lacks information to make a finding of insignificance. If there are one or more"Potentially Significant Impact"entries when the determination is made,preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is warranted. 4. Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigated"applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from"Potentially Significant Impact"to a"Less than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures,and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level(mitigation measures from Section XVII,`Earlier Analyses,"may be cross-referenced). 5. Earlier analyses may be used where,pursuant to the tiering,program EIR,or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analyses are discussed in Section XVII at the end of the checklist. 6. References to information sources for potential impacts(e.g.,general plans,zoning ordinances)have been incorporated into the checklist. A source list has been provided in Section XVII. Other sources used or individuals contacted have been cited in the respective discussions. 7. The following checklist has been formatted after Appendix I of Chapter 3,Title 14,California Code of Regulations, but has been augmented to reflect the City of Huntington Beach's requirements. (Note: Standard Conditions of Approval- The City imposes standard conditions of approval on projects which are considered to be components of or modifications to the project, some of these standard conditions also result in reducing or minimizing environmental impacts to a level of insignificance. However,because they are considered part of the project,they have not been identified as mitigation measures. For the readers' information, a list of applicable standard conditions identified in the discussions has been provided as Attachment No. 3. SAMPLE QUESTION.- Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than ISSUES(and Supporting Information Sources): Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: Landslides or Mudflows? (Sources: 1, 6) O O L7 0 Discussion: The attached source list explains that I is the Huntington Beach General Plan and 6 is a topographical map of the area which show that the area is located in a flat area. (Note: This response probably would not require further explanation). Environmental Assessment No.97-25 Page 4.of 20 Poten Y Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the Proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑x (Sources: 3, 4, 16) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑x policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? (Sources: 3, 16) c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑x vicinity?(Sources: 1) d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g., ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑p impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible uses)? (Sources: 3) e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑x established community (including a low-income or minority community)? (Sources: 1, 2, 3) Discussion: The Edwards project site is located on Edwards Street, between Ellis Avenue and Inlet Drive. The site is currently public right of way (ROW). The center portion of the ROW is improved as a two lane road. The east and west sides of the ROW are graded but undeveloped. With this proposal,the full width of the ROW will be developed to construct a four lane,primary arterial roadway(two north bound and two south bound lanes) in conformance with mitigation measures identified in the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan EIR 89-1. Between Ellis and Talbert Avenues, along the west side of the ROW, the land area is vacant but is slated for development as the Harriett M. Weider Regional Park. Single family homes exist along the west side of Edwards,north of Talbert and south of Inlet. Along the east side of the ROW is Central Park, including Dog Park and vacant land for future Central Park extension. The Talbert project site is located on Talbert Avenue,between Edwards Street and Fieldbury Lane. The site is currently ROW. The southern side of Talbert Avenue will be reduced with roadway width transitioning from 80 to 40 feet at Edwards. This project will allow for a safer traffic condition at the intersection of Edwards given the latter street's slope condition and proposed raised median. Land along the south side of the ROW is vacant and is unincorporated. The proposed project is consistent with, and is designed to implement, the City's adopted Land Use Plan, Circulation Element, environmental policies and land use ordinances for the area,including the General Plan, the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan,EIR 89-1, and adopted regional circulation and park plans. The project is compatible with existing and proposed land uses. No agricultural resources or operations exist in the project area and no established community will be divided, impacted or physically rearranged. No significant, adverse land use impacts are anticipated to be generated by the proposed project. Environmental Assessment No. 97-25 Page 5 of 20 Potolly Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑x population projections? (Sources: 3, 5) b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly ❑ p ❑ ❑x or indirectly (e.g.,through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? (Sources: 3, 5) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑x housing? (Sources: 1,2,6) Discussion:. The proposed street widening project and Talbert improvements will not in and of themselves affect the location, density, distribution or growth rate of population in the area, nor will they increase the demand for housing. The project will be located along existing right of way and will not displace any existing housing units, affordable or otherwise. The proposed Edwards Street project is a part of the City'.s overall circulation plan and is intended to help provide adequate circulation for existing and planned land uses pursuant to the City's adopted Land Use Plan, Circulation Element and Holly Seacliff Specific Plan. Additionally,the proposed Edwards Street project is identified as a mitigation measure in EIR 89-1 to offset the traffic impacts projected to be generated by the buildout of the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan. No significant adverse population and/or housing impacts are anticipated to be generated by the proposed project. III.GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? (Sources: 3,4,7,8) ❑ ❑ ❑ p b) Seismic ground shaking? (Sources: 3,7,8) ❑ ❑ ❑ p c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ❑ ❑ ❑ x❑ (Sources: 3,7,8) d) Seiche,tsunami, or volcanic hazard? (Sources: 3,7, ❑ ❑ ❑ p 8) e) Landslides or Mudflows? (Sources: 3,7,9) ❑ ❑ ❑ p Environmental Assessment No.97-25 Page 6 of 20 Potently Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil ❑ ❑ ❑x ❑ conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? (Sources: 3,7) g) Subsidence of the land? (Sources: 8) ❑ ❑ ❑x ❑ h) Expansive soils? (Sources: 3,7, 8) ❑ . ❑ ❑x ❑ i) Unique geologic or physical features? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑x (Sources:3,7,8 ) Discussion: The entire project site is proposed to be graded. Grading will involve approximately 24,460 cubic yards of cut with a maximum depth cut of 11.0 feet, and 9,365 cubic yards of fill with a maximum slope height of 11.5 feet. Approximately 15,100 cubic yards will be exported from the site. The proposed design will moderately change the street profile of Edwards Street from its current grade of approximately 12 percent to a maximum grade of 8.8 percent. Vertical curves of 1,300 feet and 300 feet are included to facilitate a grade transition and sight distance. The ultimate street cross section includes the eighty (80) feet of right of way and a two (2)foot wide transition area outside the right of way on each side of the street. The final grade of the transition area will not exceed a 2:1 slope ratio . consistent with the specifications of the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan and EIR 89-1 and Addendum. Grading will be subject to standard conditions of approval ensuring that soils conditions are suitable for the proposed street improvements. The project site is not located in an area identified as having liquefaction, landslide or mudslide risks, or risk of seiche,tsunami, or volcanic hazards. Construction of the project will result in short term wind and water erosion impacts. These impacts will be minimized through implementation of standard conditions of approval requiring the use of dust control measures and the implementation of a City approved desilting plan. (See conditions No. 1, 2 and 3 in Attachment 3.) The project will result in minor topographical changes. However,the existing topography in the area of improvements is not considered to be geologically unique. The project site is located within the seismically active southern California area. Seismic hazards constitute an existing safety condition experienced by all development in the southern California region. Site specific seismic hazards generally stem from the potential for fault rupture or ground failure. However,the project site is located approximately two miles from the Newport Inglewood fault and is not located within the Alquist-Priolo Special Hazards Zone. The project site is located in the vicinity of a branch of the Bolsa-Fairview Fault which is considered to be inactive or non-existent. With the standard conditions of approval as identified in Attachment 3 of this environmental assessment,the proposed project is not anticipated to impose any significant, adverse geologic impacts. Environmental Assessment No. 97-25 Page 7 of 20 • Po*lly Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact IV.WATER. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or ❑ ❑ ❑x ❑ the rate and amount of surface runoff? (Sources: 2) b) Exposure of people.or property to water related ❑ ❑ ❑x ❑ hazards such as flooding? (Sources: 9) c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of ❑ ❑ ❑ p surface water quality(e.g.,temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? (Sources: 1) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any ❑ ❑ ❑ x❑ water body? (Sources: 1) e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of ❑ ❑ ❑ p water movement? (Sources: 1) f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either ❑ ❑ ❑ p through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? (Sources: 3) g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ❑ ❑ ❑ p (Sources:3,7,8) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? (Sources: 3,7,8) ❑ ❑ ❑ p i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater ❑ ❑ ❑ p otherwise available for public water supplies? (Sources: 3,5,7) Discussion: The proposed street improvements will be constructed in an area partially covered by impervious surfaces. Storm run off from the site currently drains toward the east and west of Edwards street into vacant land. The proposed improvements will alter the topography of the site and will introduce additional impervious surfaces,thereby increasing runoff. After construction,runoff will continue to drain east and west off the site through controlled catch basin outlets onto vacant land and natural drainage courses. Drainage systems in the area have been designed to account for the proposed widening and can adequately accommodate the increased runoff. Drainage patterns on adjacent sites will not be altered or impacted. Environmental Assessment No.97-25 Page 8 of 20 • Poten*y Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact The proposed project does not include any activity which will impact groundwater. The subject . improvements are not located in the vicinity of any marine or freshwaters. The majority of the project area is located in zone X which is outside the flood hazard area. The northeast portion of the Edwards ' Street right-of-way between Talbert and Inlet is located in flooplane zone A99. The project does not involve any activities which will impact the quality, quantity or flows of surface waters or flood waters. The project has been designed to protect the City's main water trunk line which is located under the centerline of Edwards Street,both during construction and after completion. The project will include irrigation for the center median landscaping and the transition areas. Low water using plants will be utilized and irrigation will be supplied by extending the lines that currently exist at the adjacent Central Park. With conditions of approval No. 1, 2 and 3 listed in Attachment 3 of this document, impacts related to flooding and changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff will be reduced to a level of less than significant. V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an ❑ ❑ ❑ p existing or projected air quality violation? (Sources: 10) b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? (Sources: ❑ ❑ ❑x ❑ 1) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature? ❑ ❑ ❑ x❑ (Sources: 6) d) Create objectionable odors? (Sources: 6) ❑ ❑ ❑ p Discussion: Construction equipment emissions and fugitive dust generation associated with earth moving activities may impose short-term deterioration of local ambient air quality. No long term impacts are anticipated. Conditions of approval No. 3e and 12 (See Attachment No. 3), and Mitigation Measures No. 1 and 2 identified in Attachment 4 will serve to reduce the potential air quality impacts to a level less than significant. Environmental Assessment No.97-25 Page 9 of 20 • Pote�fally Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact VI.TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ❑ ❑ ❑x ❑ (Sources: 6, 11) b) Hazards to.safety from design features (e.g., sharp ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑x . curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (Sources: 2) c) Inadequate emergency access or inadequate access ❑ ❑ ❑x ❑ to nearby uses? (Sources: 1, 2) d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? (Sources: 2,4) ❑ ❑ ❑ p e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ❑ ❑ ❑x ❑ (Sources: 2) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting ❑ ❑ ❑ p alternative transportation(e.g., bus turnouts,bicycle racks)? (Sources: 2) g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? (Sources: 1) ❑ ❑ ❑ p Discussion: Construction of the proposed project is expected to last approximately 120 working days, with road closure of approximately 90 days. The Department of Public Works has indicated that during the construction phase there will be a slight increase in trips per day due to construction activities, as well as, construction related lane closures. Temporary lane closures during construction may result in short-term interruptions to traffic circulation, including pedestrian and bicycle flow. As required by conditions of approval No. 3c, 8, 9 and 11 listed in Attachment 3 and Mitigation Measures No. 3 and 4 listed in Attachment 4 of this document, a"construction vehicle control plan"will be devised prior to commencement of construction and will be implemented during construction to minimize construction traffic impacts and ensure ongoing safety throughout construction. The vehicle control plan will include provisions such as the requirement to post construction signs to identify the routes for trucks and equipment, street closure plans, and advance coordination with Police and Fire to ensure adequate emergency vehicle access. The street widening project in and of itself will not generate traffic. The improvements are proposed to accommodate projected traffic flow anticipated by buildout of the approved Land Use Plan in the area. The improvements will provide greater circulation capacity and will bring the street grade and line of Environmental Assessment No.97-25 Page 10 of 20 • Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact sight distance into conformance with current traffic engineering standards. A traffic signal will be installed at the intersection of Edwards and Ellis. A second traffic signal may be installed at the intersection of Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue to accommodate left turn movements from eastbound Talbert Avenue to northbound Edwards Street and to allow pedestrian crossings at the Edwards/Talbert intersection. If the second traffic signal is not included in the project,the Talbert improvements may result in the diversion of trips to Varsity and Inlet Drives as left turns out of Talbert Avenue may be prohibited because of limited line of sight opportunities at Talbert Avenue. No activities are proposed which might impact waterborne, air, or rail traffic. With the implementation of conditions of approval and mitigation measures noted in this discussion,no significant, adverse circulation impacts are anticipated. VII.BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered,threatened or rare species or their ❑ ❑ ❑ p habitats (including but not limited to: plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? (Sources: 6) b) Locally designated species(e.g.,heritage trees)? ❑ ❑ ❑ p (Sources: 6) c) Locally designated natural communities(e.g., oak ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑x forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? (Sources: 6, 13) d) Wetland habitat(e.g., marsh, riparian and vernal ❑ ❑ ❑ p pool)? (Sources: 6, 13) e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ❑ ❑ ❑ p (Sources: 7) Discussion: The subject street segment is not located in the vicinity of any sensitive plant or animal resources and does not include any area used for cultivation of an agricultural crop. The project site is contained within the existing improved right-of-way adjacent to Central Park and the future Harriett M. Weider Regional Park. A 36 inch drainage culvert/wildlife corridor crossing will be installed under Edwards Street to maintain a connection between the two parks (Attachment No. 5). Minor portions of the park sites may be impacted temporarily from construction activities. However, no trees,habitat or significant biological resources.will be significantly impacted, either in the. short term or long term. The proposed project.is located in a predominately developed area and will not result in a change in the diversity of, or provide a barrier to, any plant or animal species. No impacts to wetland habitat or wildlife are anticipated. Therefore, no significant, adverse biological resources impacts are anticipated. Environmental Assessment No.97-25 Page 11 of 20 Potenit Y Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? ❑ ❑ ❑ x❑ (Source: 3) b) Use non-renewable resource in a wasteful and inefficient manner? (Sources: 3, 7) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑x c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑x and the residents of the State? (Sources: 1,3,6) Discussion: The project is not located in an area with known mineral resources with regional value and will not cause any increases in the rate of use of non-renewable energy/fuel resources. The project is not in conflict with any adopted energy conservation plans. Therefore,no significant, adverse impacts to natural resources are anticipated. IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of ❑ ❑ ❑ 19 hazardous substances (including,but not limited to: oil,pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? (Sources:3,6,7) b) Possible interference with an emergency response ❑ ❑ ❑ p plan or emergency evacuation plan? (Sources: 3,7) c) The creation of any health hazard or potential ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑x hazards? (Sources: 2,6) d) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable ❑ ❑ ❑ p brush, grass, or trees? (Sources: 2, 6) Discussion: The proposed street widening will not involve the use of any hazardous materials. The project will result in temporary lane closures along the subject street segments during construction. These temporary closures could impede,emergency fire and police response. The conditions of approval No. 3c and d,, 8, 9 and 11 listed in Attachment 3 and Mitigation Measures No. 3 and 4 listed in Attachment 4 of this document require adequate emergency response during and after construction, as well as coordination between the Public Works Department, contractor, Police and Fire departments. With the imposition of the conditions of approval and mitigation measures identified in this discussion, no significant health hazards or potential hazards related to hazardous materials are anticipated. Environmental Assessment No.97-25 Page 12 of 20 Potefly Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? (Sources: 3,7,12) ❑ ❑ p ❑ b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ❑ ❑ p ❑ (Sources: 3,7,12) Discussion: Construction Noise: Residential uses near the project may experience short term audible noise level increases during construction of the roadway widening. The construction activities will be required to comply with Chapter 8.40 Noise of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code, and with the standard conditions of approval Nos. 3b and 14 listed in Attachment 3 of this report. The hours of construction will be limited. With the implementation of the conditions of approval and adherence to the Municipal Code noise standards, no significant, adverse noise impacts are anticipated during construction of the proposed project. Long-term Noise: Long term noise levels along the widened Talbert Avenue and Edwards Street corridor are projected to be within the acceptable levels established in the City's Municipal Code and Noise Element. Therefore,no short term or long term, adverse noise impacts are anticipated to be generated by the proposed project. XI.PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? (Sources: Huntington Beach Fire ❑ ❑ ❑ p Dept.) b) Police Protection? (Sources: Huntington Beach ❑ ❑ ❑ p Police Dept.) c) Schools? (Sources: 13) ❑ ❑ ❑ p d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? (Sources: City of Huntington Beach) ❑ ❑ p ❑ e) Other governmental services? (Sources: City of Huntington Beach) ❑ ❑ ❑ p Discussion: The project will not require any additional Police or Fire personnel or facilities to serve the site. In addition, it will not impact any school or recreational facilities or require any increases in government services. The proposed improvements will be constructed and maintained by the City. However,the project will not require any substantial increase in personnel or maintenance operations. Therefore, no significant adverse impacts to public services are anticipated. Environmental Assessment No.97-25 Page 13 of 20 • Pote*ly Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact XII.UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? (Sources: 5, 7) ❑ ❑ ❑ p b) Communication systems? (Source: 5,7) ❑ ❑ ❑ 19 c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution ❑ ❑ ❑ x❑ facilities: (Sources 5,7) d) Sewer or septic tanks? (Sources: 5,7) ❑ ❑ ❑ p e) Storm water drainage? (Sources: 5, 7) ❑ ❑ ❑ p f) Solid waste disposal? (Sources: 5, 7) ❑ ❑ ❑ p g) Local or regional water supplies? (Sources: 5, 7) ❑ ❑ ❑ p Discussion: The proposed project has been designed so as not to impact the existing water line which runs beneath the centerline along Edwards Street. Storm water catch basins will be included and anticipated runoff will be accommodated by the existing storm drain system. Existing 66 kv electrical lines will be relocated further west of Edwards Street and will remain above ground due to their high voltage. Existing 12kv electrical lines will be placed undergound in Edwards Street. An existing under ground Southern California Edison fuel line that extends along the west side of Edwards Street will be relocated along Edwards Street in order to maintain adequate cover. Street lights will be installed at appropriate distances along Edwards Street. Solid waste disposal,local and regional water supplies, natural gas and communication systems will not be impacted by the proposed project. Therefore,the project poses no significant, adverse impacts to utilities and service systems. XIII.AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? (Sources: ❑ ❑ ❑p ❑ 1) b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑x (Sources: 1, 4) c) Create light or glare? (Sources: 2) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑x Environmental Assessment No.97-25 Page 14 of 20 • Potolly Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact Discussion: The proposed construction will occur adjacent to parkland and single family residences to the south and..north of the site. The proposed improvements will not obstruct any significant view opportunities or create a permanently visually offensive site. However,temporary visual impacts from construction activity such as grading and open trenches will occur. In the vicinity of the proposed project, Edwards Street is designated as a Secondary Path/Image Corridor and a Landscape Corridor. The project area.will be landscaped in accordance with the comprehensive landscape plan adopted for the Holly Seacliff area in the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan. The standard conditions of approval listed in Attachment 3 of this document(Nos. 4,5 and 13)require that the site be maintained free from debris. In addition, landscaping will be provided in the raised median, slopes and transition areas for aesthetic enhancement. Therefore,no significant, adverse aesthetic impacts are anticipated. XIV.CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? (Sources: ❑ ❑ ❑ p 14,17) b) Disturb archaeological resources? (Sources: 14,17) ❑ ❑ p ❑ c) Affect historical resources?. (Sources: 15) ❑ ❑ .❑ N d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which ❑ ❑ ❑ p would affect unique ethnic cultural values? (Sources: 1,2,3) e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the ❑ ❑ ❑ p potential impact area? (Sources: 1,3) Discussion: Paleontological resources: The project site is not identified as being paleontologically significant. During previous studies and excavations conducted at the site, no significant paleontological resources were identified. The Mitigation and Monitoring Plan adopted with EIR 89-1 outlines five measures(EIR 89-1 Mitigation and Monitoring Plan,Page 63,Paleontology. 6-10)to mitigate potential impacts on paleontological resources in the area. (See Attachment 3, condition of approval No. 15 and 16, and Mitigation Measure No. 5,Attachment 4.) The proposed Edwards widening will comply with these mitigation measures as appropriate. Archeological Resources: Per the mitigation measures adopted with. EIR 894, an archeological assessment of the site and surrounding areas was prepared by Scientific Resources Surveys, Inc. in 1991 and a written report was prepared(SRS Project No. 977, dated 2/19/92). Excavation and study of the site resulted in significant findings of artifacts, shellfish remains and human burial sites. The artifacts and shellfish deposits were analyzed, recorded and transferred for further study and storage as Environmental Assessment No.97-25 Page 15 of 20 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact appropriate. The burial remains were re-buried in accordance with the"Reburial Agreement"between the archeologist, SRS, Inc. and Native American Consulting Services, dated 1/29/91 and attached to SRS No. 977. SRS No. 977 concluded that the twelve month work effort resulted in complete mitigation of the resources within the road widening corridor and that"no further mitigation for archaeology is necessary"for the area. The Assessment was reviewed by a neutral third party, Dr. Wallace, Professor Emertius of Anthropology of the California State University , Long Beach. Dr. Wallace concluded that the SRS No. 977 study is a complete field record of the project area and that the project area, "Edwards Hill", may be developed without concern for loss of signinficant cultural resources. The professor did recommend, however,that in light of the fact that significant resources have been found on the site, including human burial sites, an archeologist should be on site during future project construction. Condition of approval Nos. 15 and 16 of Attachment 3, and Mitigation Measure No. 5 of Attachment 4 require that this recommendation be carried out. If artifacts or burial sites are uncovered during grading, construction activities will be required to be halted until proper analysis and recordation can be undertaken and/or reburial procedures in accordance with the agreement contained in SRS No. 977 have been accomplished. Historical Resources: The project site is not located in an area identified as having historic significance. The proposed project does not have the potential to cause a physical change.which would affect ethnic cultural values, nor will it restrict religious or sacred uses. Therefore, with the implementation of the conditions of approval and mitigation measures discussed in this section, no significant, adverse cultural resources impacts are anticipated. XV.RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑x parks or other recreational facilities? (Sources: 1, 2) b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑x (Sources: 1) Discussion: The project will not result in the loss of existing community-wide recreational facilities. A portion of the street widening will occur adjacent to Central Park and the future Harriett M. Wieder Regional Park. This area will be temporarily blocked from public access during construction. The necessary right of way area/easements for construction.areas have been obtained and no additional right of way or easements are anticipated to be necessary. The open space/greenbelt areas.adjacent.to Central Park and the fixture Harriet M. Weider Regional Park will be returned to their original condition after the construction is completed. No significant, adverse impacts to recreational facilities or amenities are anticipated. Environmental Assessment No.97-25 Page 16 of 20 • Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the ❑ ❑ ❑ p quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? (Sources: 2, 7) Discussion: The project is not located in the areas of any wildlife or biological resource areas and will not substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, or reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal. No significant, adverse impacts are anticipated from the proposed project. b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short- ❑ ❑ . ❑ x❑ term, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals? (Sources: 3) Discussion: The proposed project is consistent with the City of Huntington Beach General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Holly Seacliff Specific Plan and EIR 89-1. The project will implement required mitigation measures for the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan and EIR 89-1, as well as the Holly Seacliff Development.Agreement. The proposed project will enhance traffic flow, improve the current status of the Edwards Street grade and improve line of sight visibility. The project will not achieve short term goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ❑ ❑ ❑ p ("Cumulatively considerable"means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) (Sources: Discussion: See discussion of items no. I-XV above. Environmental Assessment No.97-25 Page 17 of 20 Potentially . Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human ❑ ❑ ❑p ❑ beings, either directly or indirectly? (Sources: 2, 6) Discussion: See discussion of items no. I-XV above. Environmental Assessment No.97-25 Page 18 of 20 XVII. EARLIER ANALYSIS Earlier analyses may be used where,pursuant to tiering,program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063 (c)(3)(D). Earlier Documents Prepared and Utilized in this Analysis Reference# Document Title Available for Review at: 1 Project Vicinity Map See Attachment#1 2 Site Plan See Attachment#2 City of Huntington Beach 3 City of Huntington Beach General Plan Community Development Dept., Planning/Zoning Information Counter, P Floor 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach 4 City of Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision .Ordinance " 5 City of Huntington Beach Environmental Impact Report " for General Plan Update 6 Project Narrative " 7 City of Huntington Beach General Plan Technical " Background Report for General Plan Update 8 Geotechnical Inputs " for City of Huntington Beach 9 FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (November 3, 1993) " 10 Air Quality Handbook, South Coast Air Quality " Management District 11 Trip Generation, 4th Edition " Institute of Transportation Engineers City of Huntington Beach City 12 City of Huntington Beach Municipal Code Clerk Office, 2nd Floor 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach 13 City of Huntington Beach City of Huntington Beach CEQA Procedures Handbook Community Development Dept., Environmental Assessment No.97-25 Page 19 of 20 Planning/Zoning Information Counter, 3Td Floor 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach 14 City of Huntington Beach Archaeological Site Vicinity " Map 15 City of Huntington Beach Historic District Location " Map 16 Holly Seacliff Specific Plan/EIR 89-1 " 17 Scientific Resources Study No. 977 " 18 Third parry review of Scientific Resources Study No. " 977. Letter dated June 29, 1992 from William J. Wallace, Ph.D. to Mr. Robert Hammond, City of Huntington Beach Environmental Assessment No.97-25 Page 20 of 20 ATTACHMENT 1 VICINITY MAP Environmental Assessment No.97-25 anti KV VA M WrIll killp- �, *�� W:E■l■m■■■■�■■■■■� == == .�►E, All ia Roam i. maw — ♦�� 'NI{IIINIII II!{II{IIII{ i- ''- i �,,I I I I I I I I I I I1:111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIII`IIIIIIIIIIII �■---rllllllllllll=ll- Illt IIIIIIII _ ,:IIIIIIIIIIII ,;� � _ �illlllllllll�� sows �1�1 � =** "� �►. �miuuum - 1 �� uuuuum �uimmuu 1 w �v ATTACHMENT 2 SITE PLAN Environmental Assessment No. 97-25 w ATTACHMENT 3 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL i Environmental Assessment No.97-25 i Environmental Assessment No. 97-25 - Conditions of Approval 1. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code, Zoning Ordinance, Building and Fire Codes, as well as, applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards. 2. A Grading Plan, prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted for review and approval prior to issuance of a grading permit. 3. Prior to issuance of grading permits,the Public Works Department shall: a. Prepare a drainage and erosion control plan for construction of the project. The plan shall include measures such as the following: • Diversion of off-site runoff away from the construction site; • Prompt revegetation of proposed landscape areas; • Perimeter sandbagging or temporary basins to trap sediment; and • Regular sprinkling of exposed soils during construction phases to minimize fugitive dust. b. Ensure that all grading and construction vehicles.and equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped and maintained with effective muffler systems that use state of the art noise attenuation and that stockpiling and/or vehicle staging areas shall be located as far as practicable from sensitive noise receptors. c. Be responsible for the incorporation of measures to reduce construction related traffic congestion. Measures shall include: • Provision of rideshare incentives. • Provision of transit incentives for construction personnel. • Configuration of construction parking to minimize traffic interference. • Measures to minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes. • Use of a flagman to guide traffic when deemed necessary. d. Develop a truck and construction vehicle routing plan. This plan shall specify the hours in which transport activities can occur and methods to minimize construction related impacts to adjacent residents. e. Be responsible for assuring that construction vehicles are equipped with proper emission control equipment to substantially reduce emissions. 4. Landscaping shall be provided in accordance with the adopted Holly Seacliff Specific Plan for Edwards Street and in accordance with the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance for Talbert Avenue. 5. Landscape architectural plans shall be submitted to the Public Works Division Landscape Architect and approved prior to construction of project. Installation shall be in accordance with the Arboricultural and Environmental Assessment No. 97-25 Attachment No. 3 -Conditions of Approval Landscape Standards and Specifications,the "Greenbook"for Public Works construction projects and the inspector's discretion. 6. A separate water meter and backflow prevention device shall be provided for the irrigation system. 7. Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be completed prior to final inspection/within 12 months. 8. The Public Works Department shall ensure the standards regarding pedestrian(including ADA) and bicycle safety along the perimeter sidewalks have been met. 9. The applicant shall notify the City of Huntington Beach Fire and Police Departments of the duration and the extent of any street lane closures a minimum of 24-hours prior to the initiation of grading activities so.that they can identify alternative emergency routes for the duration of the street closures,if necessary 10. Prior to initiation of grading, the applicant shall contact all utility providers and identify the location of existing utility lines within the subject public rights-of way. The applicant shall notify the companies of trenching activities so that impacts to existing line and disruptions to existing service can be avoided. 11. A minimum of 10 days prior to start of construction activity,the Public Works Department shall: a. Post construction signs indicating the nature of construction, its expected duration and provide a contact name and phone number for the project. b. Submit to the Fire and Police Departments a traffic circulation plan identifying the routes which equipment and trucks will use to access and depart from the area. The plan shall use routes which will generate the minimum number of circulation conflicts with residential,pedestrian,bicycle and vehicle traffic. 12. During grading and construction,the Public Works Department shall: a. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems in all areas where vehicles travel to keep damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site; b. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day; c. Use low sulfur fuel(0.5%)by weight for construction equipment; d. Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days first stage smog alerts); e. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts. f. Be responsible for assuring that vehicle movement on any unpaved surface other than water trucks shall be terminated if wind speeds exceed 15 miles per hour. Environmental Assessment No.97-25 Attachment No.3 -Conditions of Approval 13. All building spoils such as unusable lumber,wire,pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. 14. All operations shall comply with the City of Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance. Construction shall be limited to Monday-Saturday 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal Holidays. 15. A certified archeologist shall monitor the site during grading. In the event that significant cultural, paleontologic or archeological sites are unearthed, grading shall cease until proper documenting in accordance with EIR 89-1 and SRS 977 has been accomplished and, if necessary,proper re-burial in accordance with SRS, 977 has been undertaken. 16. Mitigation measures 5 -10, Page 63, from EIR 89-1 regarding Paleontological Resources shall be adhered to as appropriate. Environmental Assessment No.97-25 Attachment No.3 -Conditions of Approval ATTACHMENT 4 MITIGATION MEASURES Environmental Assessment No.97-25 Proposed Mitigation Measures -Environmental Assessment No. 97-25 Air Qualily Impacts: The proposed project will generate short term air quality and exhaust odor impacts during construction of the new storm drain system 1. Mitigation: The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code, Building and Fire codes, as well as, applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances and standards 2. Mitigation: Use water trucks or sprinkler systems in all areas where vehicles travel to keep damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site: • Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day; • Use low sulfur fuel(.05%)by weight for construction equipment; • Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days (first stage smog alerts); • Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts, and • Maintain equipment engines in proper tune. Circulation Impact: The project may result in temporary lane closures along the subject street segment. These temporary street closures may impede emergency fire and police response during these periods. 3. Mitigation: The Public Works Department or designee shall notify the Fire and Police Departments of the duration and the extent of any street lane closures related to construction of the proposed project a minimum of 24-hours prior to the initiation of such activities in order to identify alternative emergency routes for the duration of the street closures, if necessary. 4. Mitigation: Alternative 1 -Install traffic signal at intersection of Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue to provide for northbound left turns from Talbert Avenue to Edwards Street. Alternative 2 -to prohibit northbound left turns from Talbert Avenue to northbound Edwards Street. Circulation Impact: Construction related closures an the increase in construction traffic may generate short term circulation impacts and introduce new obstacles to motor, bicycle and pedestrian traffic. 5. Mitigation: A minimum of 10 days prior to the commencement of construction on the project,the Public Works Department shall prepare and implement a circulation plan identifying the routes by which construction equipment and trucks should use to access and depart from the area. The plan shall use routes which will generate the minimum number of circulation conflicts with residential, pedestrian,bicycle and vehicle traffic. A minimum of 10 days prior to the commencement of construction on the project,the Public Works Department shall also prepare and post information signs in the vicinity of the project site indicating Environmental Assessment No. 97-25 Attachment No.4-Mitigation Measures the nature of construction,the anticipated duration and provide a contact name and phone number for the project. Archeological Impact: The project site has been identified as containing cultural and archeological resources. Scientific Resources Study No. 977 was prepared to analyze and study the cultural and archeological resources on the project site and in the vicinity. The-study was evaluated by a third party archeologist who concluded that adequate field work had been completed and that"Edwards Hill Burial ... can now be developed without concern for the loss of significant cultural resources in the specific areas explored by Scientific Resources Surveys. However, monitoring during development of the land is recommended." 6. Mitigation: A certified archeologist shall monitor the site during grading. In the event that significant cultural,paleontologic or archeological sites are unearthed, grading shall cease until proper documenting in accordance with EIR 89-1 and SRS 977 has been accomplished and, if necessary,proper re-burial in accordance with SRS 977 has been undertaken. Environmental Assessment No.97-25 Attachment No.4-Mitigation Measures M ATTACHMENT 5 PROPOSED WILDLIFE CORRIDOR Environmental Assessment No.97-25 ii��fif 1■��i3'IT�ii�Trlt.ZT.TiI.�i".��i Wit _ NO �+ - �" �Y� �►• ► s�♦ �411ALWeop now �its MIA PRO JON oil OWN agroA0 pa, 4a PAP �. tu ZAI Y Attachment No. 5 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS 11:30am — 1:30pm (12:30am — 1:30pm) EDWARDS 33)(261)(27) VARSITY 0 Q, 64 481 43 46 Q (26) 3 (3) 6:00am — 8:00am (29) 53 25 (14) 4:OOpm — 7:OOpm (7:00am — 8:00am) (2) 6 (5:15pm — 6:15pm) EDWARDS (8) -322 12 510 .20 EDWARDS CENTRAL __j (16)(308)(22) (9)(272)(11) PARK J73)(421)(1) 02 40 28 37 Q (25) 177 1172 64 59 Q (18) 12 (12) 21 (6) (80) 122 29 (13) (35) 111 24 (6) (17) 17 (3) 17 19 33 12 542 14 12) 38 29 982 37 VARSITY h 4 P CENTRAL VARSITY b 4 CENTRAL (11)(379)(13) PARK (8)(369)(14) PARK LEGEND XX = TOTAL VOLUME '(XX) = PEAK HOUR VOLUME REFER TO "SUMMARY OF COUNTS" TABLE. DATE: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SHEET NO. •Ji iff PREPARED BY: JAA 2-17-98 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Of CHECKED BY: TAE 2-17-98 EDWARDS STREET 1 3 RErOMMFNnFn: AT. VARSITY/CENTRAL PARK INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS 11:30am — 1:30pm (12:00am — 1:00pm) EDWARDS (12)(205)(33) INLET 4 40 b 31 Q (16 1 <— (1) 6:00am — 8:00am (7) 21 29 ,6- (17) 4:OOpm — 7:OOpm (7:00am — 8:00am) (0) 1 (4:45pm — 5:45pm) EDWARDS 20 300 467 5 EDWARDS (6)(301)(16) (19)(252)(31) (24•)(415)(41) INLET�1 40 b �-j INLET_S� 1119 111 72 Q (46) 98 Q (41) 0 C=(0) 1 (1) (27)—J.?'39 31 v- (23) (11) .931 52 vg (24) (0) 0 (2) 6 3 15 6 469 16 8 24 37 972 81 ,h f OF (5)(343)(13) (14)(394)(28 LEGEND XX = TOTAL VOLUME (XX) = PEAK HOUR VOLUME REFER TO "SUMMARY OF COUNTS" TABLE. DATE: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SHEET NO. •J i iff PREPARED BY: JAA 2-17-98 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS OF IOU CHECKED BY: TAE 2-17-9s EDWARDS STREET 2 3 RECOMMENDED: AT INLET y INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS 11:30am — 1:30pm (12:15am — 1:15pm) EDWARDS " (n3)(215) TALBERT `r 4 58 434 6:00am — 8:00am 4:OOpm — 7:00pm (7:00am — 8:00om) (36) 60 (5:OOpm — 6:OOpm) 42 126 254 256 4 EDWARDS Q EDWARDS (13)(405) It ��pp�� (45) (424) TALBERTJO V (147)(239) TALBERT j 0 0 13 664 129 1092 (28) �j 37 (40) �'1 97 241 -�,418 212 503 246 `�,679 668 • 997 b 4 it 4 (152)(336) (248)(371) LEGEND XX = TOTAL VOLUME (XX) = PEAK HOUR VOLUME REFER TO "SUMMARY OF COUNTS" TABLE. DATE: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SHEET NO. •JA PREPARED BY: JAA 2-17-98 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS OF CHECKED BY: TAE 2-17-98 EDWARDS STREET 3 3 111 AT TALBERT Attachment No. 6 isoc March 13, 1998 Mr. Robert Eichblatt, City Engineer Public Works Department 2000 Main Street-- Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Subject: Edwards Street Widening Dear Bob: Attached please find an updated construction schedule for the widening of Edwards Street from Ellis Avenue north to Inlet Drive. As you know, recent meetings with the Public Works Commission have resulted in changes to the design of the street requiring revisions to.the plans originally submitted. These plan revisions have been made and we are prepared to begin j construction upon approval of required permits and signature of plans. The street widening involves the relocation of Southern California Edison's overhead transmission lines and poles along the west side of the street as well as undergrounding of the distribution system located on the existing poles. The new street width and grades must be established before the existing distribution system can be placed in underground conduits, and the tie-ins for the distribution system must take place before the transmission lines can be relocated to the new pole locations and old poles removed. Southern California Edison will not allow private subcontractors to work on the transmission system relocation, so their cooperation and availability of their crews is critical to completion of the street widening project. SCE is presently scheduled to work on this project from June 1 to October 30, 1998. We will advise you promptly of any changes to the construction schedule. Very truly yours, 1 iam . Holman Planning& Government Relations cc: Ray Silver,Acting City Administrator Daryl Smith,Acting Public Works Director Dave Webb,Deputy City Engineer Terri Elliott,Associate Traffic Engineer ,� f i Mary Beth Broeren, Senior Planner 65 =i7 Ivan Simovich A PLC Land Company 23 Corporate Plaza,Suite.250 -- ,".m 72i 9777 Telephone Newport Beach,California 92660 7 714.�729 1214 facsimile ID Task Name Start Finish 1197 2197 3197 4197 5197 6197 7197 8197 9197 10/97 11197 12197 1198 2198 3198 4/98 6198 6198 7/98 8198 9/98. 10/98 11198 1 Edwards Street IA-Ellis to Inlet Mon 213197 Tue 11124198 2 3 Preliminary Street Design Mon 2/3/97 Mon 224/97 j 4 Staff Review&Design Approval Mon 224/97 Wed 924/97 5 Prepare Improvement Plans Thu 925/97 Tue 11/11/97 6 Prepare SCE UG Distribution System Plan Wed 11/12/97 Tue 2/3/98 7 Prepare SCE OH Trans.Line Reloc.Plans Tue 127/98 Mon 3/30/98 1 8 City Improvement Plan Check Wed 11/12/97 Tue 3/31/98 9 Add Talbert Improvements Mon 11/17/97 Thu 1115/98 I- 'i 10 Talbert Reimbursement Agreement Mon 11/17/97 Fri 11/21/97 11 Public Works Commission Review Wed 121198 Wed 2118/98 12 Coastal Development Permit Wed 11/12/97 Mon 4/6198 1603/404 Permits(if required) Thu 2/19/98 Mon 420/98 j ! i Signed Plans Tue 417/98 Tue 4/7/98 i 16 Right of Way Acquisition Mon 2/3/97 Mon 2W7 17 Construction Easements Thu 2119/98 Tue 3131/98 I ( i 16 19 Bid/Contract Wed 4/8/98 Tue 428/98 20 Mobilize/Site Preparation Wed 429/98 Tue 5/5198 21 Construction Wed 5/6/98 Tue 1124/98 22 SCE Underground Distribution Relocation Mon 611/98 Fri 8/28198 23 SCE Overhead Transmission Relocations Mon 8/31/98 Fri 10/30/98 Project:Edwards Street Widening Task Milestone Rolled Up Task Rolled Up Progress ANIL Fri 3/13/98 Progress Summary ^ Rolled Up Milestone Q Page 1 .er. Attachment No. 7 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION REQUEST FOR ACTION SUBMITTED TO: Chair Smith and Members of the Commission SUBMITTED BY:p„`Les M. Jones, II, Director of Public Works PREPARED BY: David Webb, Acting Deputy City Engineer. SUBJECT: Completion of Edwards Street Improvements between Ellis Avenue and Inlet Drive and Talbert Avenue between Edwards Street and } Fieldbury Lane DATE: February 18, 1998 Statement of Issue,Funding Source,Recommended Action,Alternative Action(s),Analysis,Environmental Status, Attachment(s) Statement of Issue: Plans are currently being prepared by a consultant to widen Edwards Street from Ellis Avenue to Inlet Drive, from a two lane roadway to a four lane roadway. Included in the Edwards' plan package will be the interim street improvements plans for Talbert • Avenue from Edwards Street to approximately 500 feet west of Edwards Street. This segment of Edwards Street is classified as a Secondary Arterial requiring two lanes in each direction per the Orange County Master Plan of Arterial Highways (OCMPAH) and the City's General Plan Circulation Element. Funding Source: The roadway widening and construction are being funded via the Traffic Impact Fee program. The PLC Land Company is designing and constructing these improvements in accordance with their obligation under the Holly Seacliff Developer Agreement. Traffic Impact Fees collected from Holly Seacliff Specific Plan development will be used to pay for these street improvements. Recommended Action: Open the public meeting for comments on the project. Receive, review, and comment on project. Direct staff to proceed with the project to include the widening of Edwards Street, installation of a traffic signal at Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue and a flashing beacon on Edwards Street north of Ellis Avenue. Alternative Action(s): Provide staff with alternate direction regarding the design of street improvements of Edwards Street from Ellis Avenue to Inlet Drive and Talbert Avenue west of Edwards Street per the included Analysis section. • Completiorlef Edwards Street Improvements February 18, 1998 Page 2 Analysis: As a result of the January 21, 1998, Public Works Commission meeting, staff was directed by the Public Works Commission to look into the following: 1) a possible school bus stop on the park side of Edwards Street, 2) a traffic signal at Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue, including a flashing beacon on Edwards Street north of Ellis Avenue for northbound traffic, and 3) provisions for a Wildlife Corridor. 1) With regard to the Commission's request to look into the siting of a school bus stop on the park side of Edwards, staff called Hope View School, Mesa View School, Ocean View School District, Huntington Beach City School District, and Huntington Beach Union High School District, for the possibility of adding or relocating a school bus stop to the park side (east side) of Edwards Street. All the schools and school districts responded that they had no requests for this bus stop. Also, the schools and districts are trying to relocate bus stops off of arterials and not place new bus stops on arterials because of the "Thomas Edward Lanni Schoolbus Safety Act of 1997." Staff concurs with the schools and school districts direction to locate bus stops off of arterial streets and will encourage the district to make pick-ups and drop-offs in the residential streets to prevent children from crossing Edwards Street. 2) Staff analyzed the intersection of Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue for the installation of a traffic signal and a flashing beacon for northbound traffic. The results indicate a traffic signal at Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue is warranted and is discussed as follows: • "Half-Signal" at Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue. Staff looked into the possibility of installing a "Half-Signal" at the intersection of Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue. This will allow northbound traffic to have a continuous green at the intersection and the southbound traffic will stop at the intersection to allow left turns out of Talbert Avenue, (eastbound), onto northbound Edwards Street. There will be no flashing beacon installed on Edwards Street north of Ellis Avenue nor will a crosswalk be installed across Edwards Street with this traffic signal installation. The east to north left turn movement, would then use an acceleration lane to merge with northbound traffic on Edwards Street. With this installation, the left turns into and out of Inlet Drive would be removed to allow for the acceleration lane. The residents of this neighborhood would be able to utilize the protected left turn green arrow movement at the Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue traffic signal for egress out of the tract. A possible safety concern is the merging of the vehicles to the right with northbound traffic. Engineer's estimated cost for the traffic signal installation is $125,000. The maintenance cost is estimated to be $500 per year. • Completion of Edwards Street Improvements February 18, 1998 Page 3 "Half-Signal" at Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue Pros Cons • Vehicles traveling northbound on Edwards • No pedestrian crosswalk across Edwards Street-has continuous green Street at Talbert Avenue • Fire Department concurs with this design • No flashing beacon for northbound traffic proposal on Edwards Street • Protected left turn, (green arrow • Removal of the left turn lane into Inlet indication) into Edwards Street, Drive (eastbound to northbound) • Protected left turn, (green arrow • Removal of pedestrian crosswalk on indication) into Talbert Avenue, Edwards Street at Inlet Drive (northbound to westbound) • A possible safety concern is the vehicles exiting Talbert Avenue using an acceleration lane to merge right into the northbound traffic lanes ' • Maintenance cost for the traffic signal and flashing beacon is $500 annually • Full Signal at Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue. Staff also looked into the possibility of installing a full traffic signal at the intersection of Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue. This will stop northbound and southbound traffic to allow for eastbound to northbound traffic out of Talbert Avenue. Also, a crosswalk would be installed along with the traffic signal. A flashing beacon for northbound traffic, north of Ellis Avenue to warn motorists of a traffic signal ahead will also be installed with the traffic signal. The crosswalk on Edwards Street at Inlet Drive will be removed with the traffic signal installation. Engineer's estimated cost for the traffic signal and flashing beacon is $135,000. The maintenance cost for the traffic signal is approximately $500 per year. Full Signal at Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue Pros Cons • Protected left turn, (green arrow • Maintenance cost for the traffic signal and indication) into Edwards Street, flashing beacon.is $500 annually (eastbound to northbound) • Protected left turn, (green arrow • Potential for increased rear-end collisions indication) into Talbert Avenue, which is typical at all traffic signal (northbound to westbound) installations • Installation of a crosswalk on Edwards • Removal of the crosswalk on Edwards Street at Talbert Avenue Street at Inlet Drive • Flashing beacon will be installed on Edwards Street north of Ellis Avenue for northbound traffic to warn motorists of the traffic signal CompletioloEdwards Street Improvements February'18, 1998 Page 4 • All-Way Stop. Staff was also requested, (by residents), to analyze the intersection of Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue for All-Way Stop signs. The Stop Sign Warrant Analysis concluded that an All-Way Stop is not warranted. The primary reason why the All-Way Stop sign warrant was not met, is due to the very low number of accidents that have occured at this intersection. Only one'accident was reported over..the last 12 month period and was not a type susceptible to correction by the installation of an All-Way Stop. A Stop may be warranted if five or more accidents, of a type susceptible to correction by the installation of an All-Way Stop have occurred in a 12 month time period. 3) Staff reviewed previous records regarding the Wildlife Corridor and could not find any documentation requesting or requiring such a facility. Staff reviewed the feasibility of installing the facility and has concluded that two-12 inch concrete pipes will be installed under Edwards Street approximately 250 feet north of Ellis Avenue. Talbert Avenue is designated as a Secondary Arterial per the General Plan and requires two b + lanes in each direction. Due to the current low volume on Talbert Avenue, it will be improved on an interim basis to half of its Right-of-Way width to accomodate the Edwards Street, street improvements. Included in the improvements will be curb, gutter, sidewalk and landscaping on the south side of the street. Attachment: RD 198 LMJ/REE/DW/tae #30047 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION REQUEST FOR ACTION SUBMITTED TO: Chair Smith and Members of the Commission SUBMITTED BY: Les M. Jones, 11, Director of Public Works PREPARED BY: David Webb, Acting Deputy City Engineer SUBJECT: Completion of Edwards Street Improvements between Ellis Avenue and Inlet Drive and Talbert Avenue between Edwards Street and Fieldbury Lane DATE: January 21, 1998 Statement of Issue,Funding Source,Recommended Action,Alternative Action(s),Analysis,Environmental Status,Attachment(s) Statement of Issue: Plans are currently being prepared by a consultant to widen Edwards Street from Ellis Avenue to Talbert Avenue, from a two lane roadway to a four lane roadway. This segment of Edwards Street is a Primary Street with two lanes in each direction per the Orange County.Master Plan of Arterial Highways (OCMPAH) and the City's General Plan Circulation Element. Funding Source: The roadway widening and construction are being funded via the Traffic Impact Fee program. The PLC Land Company is designing and constructing these improvements in accordance with their obligation under the Holly Seacliff Developer Agreement. Traffic Impact Fees collected from Holly Seacliff Specific Plan development will be used to pay for these street improvements. Recommended Action: Receive, review and comment on plans. Hold a public hearing for public comment. Direct staff and proceed with project incorporating desired changes into the plans. Alternative Action(s): Provide staff with alternate direction regarding the street improvements of Edwards Street from Ellis Avenue to Talbert Avenue and Talbert Avenue west of Edwards Street. Analysis: On August 20, 1997, the Public Works Commission received and filed a Request for Action, for the "Possible Vacation of Talbert Avenue, Edwards Street to Fieldbury Lane," prepared by James D. Otterson. In the document, it discussed why Edwards Street needs to be improved to a four lane roadway. Edwards Street is currently a two lane road and is shown on the Orange County Master Plan of Arterial Highways, as well as the City's General Plan to be a primary road with two lanes in each direction. • Completion Awards Street Improvements January 21, 1998 Page 2 The City in conjunction with PLC Land Company, has hired a consultant engineer to design the Edwards Street, street improvement plans between Ellis Avenue and Inlet Drive. The Holly Seacliff Development Agreement, approved by City Council,. requires PLC Land Company to widen Edwards Street to its ultimate configuration. There are two major items that must be considered with the design of Edwards Street: 1) the City's existing 42" water transmission main in the center of the,street; and 2) the steep grade of the hill that affects the stopping sight distance for Edwards Street. Given these design constraints, City professional staff is in agreement with the design concept for Edwards Street that is represented in the current plans. The City's 42" water transmission main is the only transmission line that moves water between the northern and southern portions of the City. To maintain the integrity of the pipe, it cannot be disturbed or modified. With this in mind, the roadway grades must be dealt with to the degree that a desired four foot coverage over the pipe be maintained. The design of Edwards Hill consists of installing a two foot high raised median in some areas which will provide adequate coverage over the pipe line, while allowing the street grade to be lowered on either side to meet design speed requirements. The proposed design of Edwards Street calls for the hill to be lowered to a grade-of 8.4%, allowing a design speed of 50 mph. The current grade of the hill is 11.3%. The intersection of Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue will be raised approximately two foot as required by the grade change. However, with the grade reduction, the remaining steepness of the hill, and the need to maintain the water transmission line location, the driver's ability to see oncoming traffic will still be limited. This limitation precludes allowing the left turns from eastbound Talbert Avenue onto northbound Edwards Street. Traffic will still be able to turn left onto northbound Edwards Street from Inlet Drive or Varsity Drive. Attachment: Plans for Edwards Street between Ellis Avenue and Talbert Avenue August 20, 1997, Request for Action, "Possible Vacation of Talbert Avenue, Edwards Street to Fieldbury Lane RD 198 LMJ/REE/DW/tae RCA ROUTING tHEET INITIATING DEPARTMENT: Public Works SUBJECT: Review of Public Works Commission Decision on Edwards St. Improvements and Request for Approvals of Negative Declaration No. 97-25 and Coastal Development Permit No. 97-31 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: April 6, 1998 RCA ATTACHMENTS STATUS Ordinance (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Not Applicable Resolution (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Not Applicable Tract Map, Location Map and/or other Exhibits Not Applicable Contract/Agreement (w/exhibits if applicable) (Signed in full by the City Attorney) Not Applicable Subleases, Third Party Agreements, etc. (Approved as to form by City Attorney) Not Applicable Certificates of Insurance (Approved by the City Attorney) Not Applicable Financial Impact Statement (Unbudget, over $5,000) Not Applicable Bonds (If applicable) Not Applicable Staff Report (If applicable) Not Applicable Commission, Board or Committee Report (If applicable) Attached Findings/Conditions for Approval and/or Denial Attached EXPLANATION FOR MISSING ATTACHMENTS . REVIEWED RETURNED FORW ED Administrative Staff ( ) Assistant City Administrator (Initial) ( ) ( ) City Administrator (Initial) City Clerk ( ) EXPLANATION F>OR RETURN OF ITEM Only)(Below Space For City Clerk's Use RCA Author: TAE STATEMENT OF ACTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Council Chamber, Civic Center Huntington Beach, California Monday, April 6, 1998 A videotape recording of this meeting is on file in the Office of the City Clerk. The regular meeting of the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach was called to order at 5:00 p.m. CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ROLL CALL PRESENT: Harman, Green, Dettloff, Bauer, (Sullivan arrived at 5:10 p.m., Garofalo at 5:15 p.m.) ABSENT: Julien D-2. sty Council) Public Hearing - Review Of Public Works Decision On Edwards Street/Talbert Avenue Improvements &Consideration By Council Of Coastal Development Permit No. 97- 31/Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 97-25(Edwards Street Improvements) A motion was made by Harman, seconded by Garofalo, to approve the following recommended action: Recommended Action: Motion to: 1. Uphold the February 18, 1998, Public Works Commission support of a traffic signal at Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue; and 2. Approve Negative Declaration 97-25(Attachment No. 4)with findings and mitigation measures as set forth in (Attachment No. 2)to the Request for Council Action dated April 6, 1998; and 3. Approve Coastal Development Permit No. 97-31 with findings and conditions of approval as set forth in (Attachment No. 2)to the Request for Council Action dated April 6, 1998. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Harman, Green, Dettloff, Bauer, Sullivan, Garofalo NOES: None ABSENT: Julien I The meeting adjourned to Monday, April, 13, 1998 at 5:00 p.m., in Room B-8, City Hall, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach California and Tuesday, April 14, 1998, at 7:30 a.m., at the Waterfront Hilton Beach Resort, 21100 Pacific Coast Highway, Huntington Beach, California. /s/Connie Brockway City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California ATTEST: /s/ Connie Brockway /s/ Ralph Bauer City Clerk/Clerk Mayor STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) County of Orange ) ss: City of Huntington Beach ) I, Connie Brockway, the duly elected City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct Statement of Action of the City Council of said City at their regular meeting held on the April 6, 1998. Witness my hand and seal of the said City of Huntington Beach this 10th day of April, 1998. /s/Connie Brockway City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California . By Deputy ' y Clerk CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CONNIE BROCKWAY CITY CLERK NOTICE OF ACTION COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 97-31 APPEALABLE DEVELOPMENT Applicant: City of Huntington Beach Public Works Department Request: To Widen Edwards Street between Ellis Avenue and Inlet Drive to its ultimate width per the General Plan Circulation Element and reduce the south side of Talbert Avenue between Edwards Street and Fieldbury Lane. Location: Edwards Street (segment north of Ellis Avenue and south of Inlet Drive, including intersection of Talbert and Edwards) and Talbert Avenue (segment from Edwards Street to Fieldbury Lane.) Date Of Approval: April 6, 1998 Your application was acted upon by the Huntington Beach City Council on April 6, 1998 and your request was: Approved X Conditionally Approved Denied Withdrawn Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Zoning & Subdivision Ordinance Code, the action taken by the City Council is final. Approval of this development is appealable to the Coastal Commission pursuant to PRC S.30603. City Council action on the above item may be appealed to the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days from the date of receipt of the notice of final City action by the Coastal Commission pursuant to Section 245.32 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and Section 13110 of the California Code of Regulations. The Coastal Commission address is South Coast Area Office, 200 Oceangate, 10th Floor, Long Beach, California 90802-4302. A denial may be appealed (S.13319, Title 14, California Administrative Code) only if the City has approved a development on the basis of local land use regulations but has denied the issuance of a coastal development permit because it cannot make the findings required by Section 13311, Title 14 of the California Administrative Code. &followup:misc/Notice.doc (Telephone:714536-5227) Notice of Action Coastal Development Permit No. 97-31 Page Two Pursuant to PRC S.30603, an appeal by an aggrieved person must be filed in writing, and addressed to: California Coastal Commission South Coast Area Office 200 Oceangate, 10th Floor Long Beach, California 90801-4302 (562) 590-5071 The appeal period begins when the Commission receives this notice of action and continues for ten (10) working days. Applicants will be notified by the Coastal Commission as to whether or not an appeal has been filed. Applicants are advised not to begin construction prior to that date. Provisions of the Huntington Beach Zoning & Subdivision are such that an application becomes null and void one (1) year after the final approval, unless actual construction has begun. Connie Brockway City Clerk Attachments: Findings & Conditions (Attachment No. 2) Item As Printed In Council Agenda Packet Communications (Jerry Buchanan, Assistant Superintendent Administrative Services, Huntington Beach City School District, Mrs. Smith, Martin and Denise Menichiello, Gordon M. Watson, President Country View Estates Homeowners Association, Mrs. Hollander, Daryl Smith, Acting Public Works Director, City of Huntington Beach, John Fisher and Mrs. Reed). Legal Notice Publications Mailing Labels Statement Of Council Action g:fb11owup:m isc/Notice.doc T H E O R A N G E fer U Nis This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp 625 N. Grand Ave., Santa Ana, CA 92701 PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ) } ss. County of Orange, ) Proof of Publication of I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of twenty NOTICET'OF PUBLIC HEARING fiIt one years, and not a parry to or interested in the �97-3stal-Develop'menfP bar 17, =97.31, filed on November 17, PUBLIC NOTICE 1997, in conjunctbn with the above entitled matter. I am.the principal clerk of the NOTICE of PUBLIC NEARING above request. P BEFORE THE CITY.COUNCIL OF THE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the CITY OF HUNTINGl'ON`BEACH Coastal Development Permit - printer of The Oran a Count R@ NOTICE IS-HEREBY GIVEN that on hearing consists of a staff report, p 9 Y Register, a Monday,April 6,1998,at 7:00 PM publc hearing,City Council dis-. in the City.Council Chambers, cuZia and action;City Council of general circulation, published in the 2000 Main Street, Huntington octiononthea6oveltemmaybe newspaper 9 P Beach,the city council will hold a appeated."the.Coastal-Com- public bearing on the following mission,wrihln ten (10)_v o ng- lem: clays from the date of receipt of city of Santa Ana, County of Orange, and which the nofice,offinal City action by REVIEW OF PUBLIC WORKS COM• the Coastal Comm ssion pursuant MISSION DECISION ON EDWARDS to Section 245.32 of the Hunting-` newspaper has been adjudged to be a newspaper of STREET/rALBERT AVENUE IMPROVE. ton Beach zoning andSubdivisbn MENTS/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT Ordinance and Section 13110 of PERMIT NO. 97-31IMMGATED the California Code of Regula- eneral circulation b the Su attar Court of the NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO.97- bons,or unless Title 14, Section i g y P 25 (EDWARDS STREET IMPROVE- 13573 of the California Adminis- MENTS): . -- trafNe Code is applicable. The AppliIs County of Orange, State of California, under the Beach City Works Huntington Coastal Coast Are ion address 0 Beach,Public Works Department South Coast Area Office,.200 Request:To widen Edwards Street Oceangate. 10th- Floor, Long between Ellis Avenue and Inlet Beach, CA 90802.4302, phone date of November 19, 1905, Case No.A-21046 that Drive to,'��matCirceI�o 1EPer;he number:(310)570-5071. ent and reduce the south side of ON FILE:A copy of the proposed the notice, of which the annexed is a true printed Talbert Avenue between Edwards requestisonfiileIntheCommunity. Street and Fieldbury Lane. Development Department,20M Location:;Edwards.Street_(seg- Main Street, Huntington.Beach, copy, has been published in each regular and entire ment north"of Ellis`Avenue'and California 92648, for inspection py p 9 south of Inlet Drive,including Inter- b'the public.A copy.of the staff section of.Talbert-antl Edwards) report will be available to inter- . ested parties at City_Hall or the issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement and Talbert Avenue,(segment from Edwards Sheet to Segment Main City Library(7111 Talbert Ave. Lane) nue)afterAptll.2:1998. Project z Planner: Catherine ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are In- thereof on the following dates,to wit: O'Hara vited'to dtter,d sold hearing and etgxesS opinions or submit evl- Nifial IS HEREBY GIVEN that nt Bence for or against the a Initial environmental assessment g pp ca- 1 lion"as outlined,above. U you .(Mltiaated-Negaetag Deelaratio, challenge the Cily'CouncWi ac- - - No 7-25)for tthh above Rein was a lion in court,you may be limited processed and completed In ac- M A R C H 97 , 1998 cortlance with the California En A-to raising only those Issues you or ronmental Quality Act. it was someone else raised at the public determined that the above items, hearing-described In this notice. with-ml8gafi livered to the Cit on, would not have or In written correspondence any significant environmental of- y-at,or prior,to. facts and that a mitigated nega 'th?'Public-hearing. If there are flue declaration is warranted.This any further questions_please call • environmental assessment is on the Planningpvislon;a1.53b-5271 file at the City of Huntington°�refer`to ttle'abOVe item:DI- Beach Community Deveopment rect your written communications Department; 2000 Main Street, to.1he,Clty,Clerk. and is available for public inspec• Connie Brockway,City Clerk Bon and comment by contracting City of Huntington Beach the Community Development.. 20M Main Street,.2nd Floor Department, or by telephoning Huntington Beach,. (714)536.5271. California 92648 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the (714)536-5227 "I certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury above Item is located in the ap• Publish:Orange County Register pealable jurisdiction of the March 27,1998 under the laws of the State of California that the �Coastall_ zone and includes 3Q7000100 R-593 foregoing is true and correct": Date APRIL 1 , 19_Sa Signature PRO F OF PUBLICATION i T H E 0 Re A N 0 E C 0 U N • �s � PAYABLE TO THE REGISTER/P.O. BOX 11626 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92711 (714) 835-1234 EXT. 2490 MEMO INVOICE 03/30/98 ACCOUNT #: 0067341002 HUNT BCH CITY OF CLERKS OFF CITY CLERKS OFFICE 2000 N MAIN ST HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 CONTRACT YEAR: 05/01/92-04/30/98 CLS /CLX LEVEL: 1X SALES ID: 300 PUBLICATION P.O. JOB AD SIZE/COLOR/SECTION DATE NUMBER NUMBER AD DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 03/27/98 PUBLICWORKS 218744501 1.00X 132 BW REG 323.40 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEA TOTAL 323.40 I PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA) SS. PUBLIC NOTICE h NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Coastal De- County of Orange ) NOTICE OF veloPment Permit hearing PUBLIC NEARING consists of a staff report, BEFORE THE CITY. d�tectrasion anilCactipn l COUNCIL OF THE ouncil action on the I am a Citizen of the United States and a CrrYOF above item may be ap. HUNTiNGTON BEACH �afod to the Coastal Corn.. resident of the County aforesaid; I am NOTICE ,IS HEREBY misaton within ten (10) GIVEN that on Monday, wr rki rya from data over the age of eighteen ears, and not a April6,1998,at PM in of rec�ie Of nw notice of g g y ity action by the 2W M Steel,,ouricil H"�r$, final Commission party to or interested in the below ton Beach,the City Co�i ant to Section 245.32 of the will hold a public hearing Hunti °A Beach Zoning entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of on the follow(ng Item: and Sd bdlvltlon Ordinance REVIEW OF PUBLIC and Section 13110 of the; the H U N T I N G TO N BEACH INDEPENDENT, a WORKS COMMISSION DE- cailtomla code of Regula. CISION ON EDWARDS lions, or ut11ess Tlhe 14. newspaper of general circulation, I MMPR printed PA/TAI.B OVE MENMEN-ENUE 'I0n + the Call. TS/ COASTAL DEVELOPMENT "OPMENT Administrative and published in the City of Huntington PERMIT NO.9731/MITI• is appli�bis. The Coastal iA GATED NEGATIVE DEC Commlaston address is Beach, County of Orange, State of h Coast Area Office, WARDS STREET TION NO.97-25 (I Ocearoft1othFloor. California, and that attached Notice is a PR�yyOV�EMENTS): Applicant: Long pt CA 9 uublict worksurdinpto" Bead'' 4570-5071. true and complete copy as was printed Rwu T.o = ON FILE A copy of the yards $keel elwsen Era tad request is on file and published in the Huntington Beach Atrertue and rwe to prop ilia Communhv De- Its ultimata width par the veiopment Deparfmart, and Fountain Valley issues of said General Plan C eutation e- 2000 Main Street. Huroxi. ement and reduce the ton Beach, California newspaper to wit the issue(s) of: south side of TaR>art Av- 92646, for kapection by enue between Edwards the public. A copy of the Street and Plddbury Lars. staff report will be available Location: Edwards Street to interested parties at City (asgrr►ertt tt"M of Ellis Aw Hall or the Main City Li- anus and south of Intel bre (7111 Talbert Av Drive,irtdtrdirtg Intersection anus)after Aprt 2,199& of Talbert and Edward$) ALL INTEiIESTED PER- Ap r i 1 2 , 1998 and Talbert Avenue (seg. SONS are invited to attend merit from Edwards Street said hearing and express to Fleidb1ay�Lane) Project opinions or submit avl Planner Catherine O'Hara dance for or against the NOTICE IS HEREBY application as outlined GIVEN that an Inhlal envl- above.If you challenge the ronmentai assessment(I% City Council's action, in fated Declaration court, you may be limited I declare, under penalty of perjury, that ►� 971 go above to raising only those Issues Rom was Processed and You or someone also the foregoing is true and correct. completed in accordance ral$ed at the public hearing t7 1wfth the. California Env1- described[it tltis notice,or rorarterttal Ouallty Act it in written correspondence was determined that the delivered to fhe Cit at above hems, with mitiga. gor to,the public hearin . tlom would not have any there are my further Executed on Aoril 2 , 199 R si niticaM on* P � the Wated at Costa Mesa, California. negatitredec�ItuMatloniswar- 5271 and t mit wo the ranted. This onvronmental above hem. Direct your assessment is on file at the written communications to City of Hun*4iton Beach the City Clark. Community Dwebpmant Connie Brockway, Department, 2000 Main City Clark,City of Htto• Street. and is available for tiryton Botch, 2000 public Mapectlon and coot- main sfteel� oor gw Fl , meat by comtacHnii. die d Cal. Community Dev@lopment Norma 9= , (714) "52p epartnterrt, 5w.4871� T N07I T JiEREBY Published Huntington GIVEN flmd the above hem Beac"ountain Valley in- Signature Is located l Ind �,�@4 UW Oil-M Development Permit No, 9731, tied on November 17, 1997, to conjunction with the above request. r� NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEEG BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday,April 6, 1998,at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach,the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following item: REVIEW OF PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION DECISION ON EDWARDS STREET/ TALBERT AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO.97- 31/NHTIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO.97-25(EDWARDS STREET EWPROVEMENTS): Applicant: City of Huntington Beach,Public Works Department Request: To widen Edwards Street between Ellis Avenue and Inlet Drive to its ultimate width per the General Plan Circulation Element and reduce the south side of Talbert Avenue between Edwards Street and Fieldbury Lane. Location: Edwards Street(segment north of Ellis Avenue and south of Inlet Drive, including intersection of Talbert and Edwards)and Talbert Avenue(segment from Edwards Street to Fieldbury Lane) Project Planner: Catherine O'Hara NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an initial environmental assessment(Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 97-25)for the above item was processed and completed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. It was determined that the above items,with mitigation,would not have any significant environmental effects and that a mitigated negative declaration is warranted. This environmental assessment is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department,2000 Main Street, and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community Development Department, or by telephoning(714)536-5271. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the above item is located in the appealable jurisdiction of the Coastal Zone and includes Coastal Development Permit No.97-31,filed on November 17, 1997, in conjunction with the above request. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Coastal Development Permit hearing consists of a staff report, public hearing, City Council discussion and action. City Council action on the above item may be appealed to the Coastal Commission within ten(10)working days from the date of receipt of the notice of final City action by the Coastal Commission pursuant to Section 245.32 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and Section 13110 of the California Code of Regulations, or unless Title 14, Section 13573 of the California Administrative Code is applicable. The Coastal Commission address is South Coast Area Office,200 Oceangate, 10th Floor,Long Beach,CA 90802-4302, phone number: (310) 570-5071. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library(7111 Talbert Avenue)after April 2, 1998. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court,you may be limited to raising only those issues.you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice,or in written correspondence delivered to the City at,or prior to,the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning Division at 536-5271 and refer to the above item. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street,2nd Floor Huntington Beach,California 92648 (714) 536-5227 s City Administrator's Office To: Connie Brockway From: Ray Silver, Acting City Administrator Date: March 26, 1998 Subject: Legal Notice for Hearing on CDP 97-31, Neg. Dec. 97-25 relating to the traffic signal at Edwards & Talbert By this notice, I authorize use of the Orange County Register to advertise for the public hearing on the above. Publication in the O. C. Register is necessary since the deadline for publication in the Huntington Beach Independent was missed because of a miscommunication and more than 200 residents have already received hand carried notice of this meeting. Ray Silv , Acting City Administrator RS:PD • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday,April 6, 1998,at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following item: REVIEW OF PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION DECISION ON EDWARDS STREET/ TALBERT AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO.97- 31/NHTIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO.97-25(EDWARDS STREET EUPROVEMENTS): Applicant: City of Huntington Beach,Public Works Department Request: To widen Edwards Street between Ellis Avenue and Inlet Drive to its ultimate width per the General Plan Circulation Element and reduce the south side of Talbert Avenue between Edwards Street and Fieldbury Lane. Location: Edwards Street(segment north of Ellis Avenue and south of Inlet Drive, including intersection of Talbert and Edwards)and Talbert Avenue(segment from Edwards.Street to Fieldbury Lane) Project Planner: Catherine O'Hara NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an initial environmental assessment(Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 97-25)for the above item was processed and completed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. It was determined that the above items,with mitigation,would not have any significant environmental effects and that a mitigated negative declaration is warranted. This environmental assessment is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department,2000 Main Street,and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community Development Department,or by telephoning(714) 536-5271. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the above item is located in the appealable jurisdiction of the Coastal Zone and includes Coastal Development Permit No.97-31,filed on November 17, 1997, in conjunction with the above request. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Coastal Development Permit hearing consists of a staff report, public hearing,City Council discussion and action. City Council action on the above item may be appealed to the Coastal Commission within ten(10)working days from the date of receipt of the notice of final City action by the Coastal Commission pursuant to Section 245.32 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and Section 13110 of the California Code of Regulations,or unless Title 14, Section 13573 of the California Administrative Code is applicable. The Coastal Commission address is South Coast Area Office,200 Oceangate, loth Floor,Long Beach,CA 90802-4302,phone number: (310) 570-5071. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department,2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,California 92648,for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library(7111 Talbert Avenue)after April 2, 1998. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court,you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice,or in written correspondence delivered to the City at,or prior to,the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning Division at 536-5271 and refer to the above item. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street,2nd Floor Huntington Beach,California 92648 (714)536-5227 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday,April 6, 1998,at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following item: REVIEW OF PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION DECISION ON EDWARDS STREET/ TALBERT AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 97- 31/NHTIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO.97-25(EDWARDS STREET IMPROVEMENTS): Applicant: City of Huntington Beach,Public Works Department Request: To widen Edwards Street between Ellis Avenue and Inlet Drive to its ultimate width per the General Plan Circulation Element and reduce the south side of Talbert Avenue between Edwards Street and Fieldbury Lane. Location: Edwards Street(segment north of Ellis Avenue and south of Inlet Drive, including intersection of Talbert and Edwards)and Talbert Avenue(segment from Edwards Street to Fieldbury Lane) Project Planner: Catherine O'Hara NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an initial environmental assessment(Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 97-25)for the above item was processed and completed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. It was determined that the above items,with mitigation,would not have any significant environmental effects and that a mitigated negative declaration is warranted. This environmental assessment is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department,2000 Main Street,and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community Development Department,or by telephoning(714)536-5271. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the above item is located in the appealable jurisdiction of the Coastal Zone and includes Coastal Development Permit No.97-31,filed on November 17, 1997, in conjunction with the above request. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Coastal Development Permit hearing consists of a staff report, public hearing, City Council discussion and action. City Council action on the above item may be appealed to the Coastal Commission within ten(10)working days from the date of receipt of the notice of final City action by the Coastal Commission pursuant to Section 245.32 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and Section 13110 of the California Code of Regulations,or unless Title 14, Section 13573 of the California Administrative Code is applicable. The Coastal Commission address is South Coast Area Office,200 Oceangate, loth Floor,Long Beach,CA 90802-4302,phone number: (310) 570-5071. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library(7111.Talbert Avenue)after April 2, 1998. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court,you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice,or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to,the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning Division at 536-5271 and refer to the above item. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach,California 92648 (714)536-5227 'b FAX FROM: CONNIE BROCKWAY, CITY CLERK CITY CLERK'S OFFICE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH P O Box 19012000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH (714) 536-5227 (714) 374-1557 FAX Date: Numb4r of Pages (including over page): To: By: Deputy City Clerk Fax Q p Phone: Remarks: Urgent For your review Reply ASAP Please comment Per your request 7t� 98 r le lqi � l i *4,4.J:4 4 A I i TRAN ',--.'JMI SS ION rF' E P 0 R T FHl.)Nj;/TT, NO. 4 5 4 U 5 li Fj? D A TE t P i 1.) T 1 M oj i j,^,d S,Uj L 7 f t 1 . f NOTICE OF PUBLIC HE G BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that.on Monday,April 6, 1998,at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach,the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following item: REVIEW OF PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION DECISION ON EDWARDS STREET/ TALBERT AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 97- 31/1VIITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 97-25(EDWARDS STREET IMPROVEMENTS): Applicant: City of Huntington Beach, Public Works Department Request: To widen Edwards Street between Ellis Avenue and Inlet Drive to its ultimate width per the General Plan Circulation Element and reduce the south side of Talbert Avenue between Edwards Street and Fieldbury Lane. Location: Edwards Street(segment north of Ellis Avenue and south of Inlet Drive, including intersection of Talbert and Edwards)and Talbert Avenue(segment from Edwards Street to Fieldbury Lane) Proiect Planner: Catherine O'Hara NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an initial environmental assessment(Mitigated Negative Declaration No: 97-25)for the above item was processed and completed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. It was determined that the above items,with mitigation,would not have any significant environmental effects and that a mitigated negative declaration is warranted. This environmental assessment is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department,2000 Main Street,and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community Development Department, or by telephoning(714) 536-5271. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the above item is located in the appealable jurisdiction of the Coastal Zone and includes Coastal Development Permit No.97-31,filed on November 17, 1997, in conjunction with the above request. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Coastal Development Permit hearing consists of a staff report, public hearing, City Council discussion and action. City Council action on the above item may be appealed to the Coastal Commission within ten(10)working days from the date of receipt of the notice of final City action by the Coastal Commission pursuant to Section 245.32 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and Section 13110 of the California Code of Regulations,or unless Title 14, Section 13573 of the California Administrative Code is applicable. The Coastal Commission address is South Coast Area Office, 200 Oceangate, 10th Floor,Long Beach,CA 90802-4302, phone number: (310) 570-5071. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library(7111 Talbert Avenue)after April 2, 1998. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at,or prior to,the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning Division at 536-5271 and refer to the above item. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach,California 92648 (714)536-5227 CITY COUNCI VRE EVELOPMENT AGENCY PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST SUBJECT ?-oi 1 C> DEPARTMENT: V�i��c_iNks �CnW�w. l � MEETING DATE: A CONTACT: ��i� &7G0, PHONE: c-)L � O ` ee-ir✓i EI�, o I- x 5 s tso /( N/A YES NO �✓✓�.:-�- ,moo• �'_!•,31 �a�"� ( ) (N ( .) Is the notice attached? ( ) ( ) Do the Heading and Closing of Notice reflect City Council(and/or Redevelopment Agency)hearing? ( ) ( ) Are the date, day and time of the public hearing correct? ( ) 46 If an appeal, is the appeicant's name included in the notice? ( ) ( ) If Coastal Development Permit,does the notice include appeal language? ( ) ( ) Is there an Environmental Status to be approved by Council? ( ) ( ) Is a map attached for publication? ( ) ( ) Is a larger ad required? Size ( ) ( ) Is the verification statement attached indicating the source and accuracy of the mailing list? Lok,e-ls C,,d C►',0sS C*V_Cxk_,4.• Q- ( ( ) ( ) Are the applicant's name and address part of the mailing labels? ( ) ( ) Are the appellant"s name and address part of the mailing labels? If Coastal Development Permit, is the Coastal Commission part of the mailing labels? ( ) ( ) If Coastal Development Permit,are the Resident labels attached? ( ) ( ) Is the33343 report attached? (Economic Development Dept. items only) VX Please complete the following: j 1. Minimum days from publication to hearing date 10 2. Number of times to be published I 3. Number of days between publications t--A az 1 - I 100'..Radius Resident Labels Resident . Resident Resident 6481 Newbury 18012 Lakepoint Ln. 18022 Lakepoint Ln. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Resident Resident Resident 18042 Lakepoint Ln. 18052 Lakepoint Ln. 18062 Lakepoint Ln. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Resident Resident Resident 18072 Lakepoint Ln. 18082 Lakepoint Ln. 18092 Lakepoint Ln. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Resident Resident Resident 18102 Lakepoint Ln. 18122 Lakepoint Ln. 18132 Lakepoint Ln. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Resident Resident Resident 18142 Lakepoint Ln. 18152 Lakepoint Ln. 18162 Lakepoint Ln. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach,-CA 92647 Resident Resident Resident 18151 Lakepoint Ln. 18161 Lakepoint Ln. 18142 Brentwell Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Resident Resident Resident 18152 Brentwell Cir. 18141 Brentwell Cir. 18151 Brentwell Cir. Huntington Beach,.CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Resident Resident Resident 18132 Fieldbury Ln. 18152 Fieldbury Ln. 18011 Clearwater Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Resident Resident Resident 18021 Clearwater Cir. 18031 Clearwater Cir. 18041 Clearwater Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 100' Radius Resident Labels g:IabcIs:fortn Resident Resident Resident 18051 Clearwater Cir. 18061 Clearwater Cir. 18071 Clearwater Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Resident Resident Resident 18081 Clearwater Cir. 18091 Clearwater Cir. 18101 Clearwater Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Resident Resident Resident 18111 Clearwater Cir. 6411 Talegate Dr. 6401 Talegate Dr. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Resident Resident Resident 6391 Talegate Dr. 6381 Talegate Dr. 18191 Fieldbury Ln. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Resident Resident Resident 18201 Fieldbury Ln. 18181 Leaf Cir. 18141 Fieldbury Ln. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647. Resident Resident Resident 18121 Fieldbury Ln. 18132 Wellbrook Cir. 6541 Silverspur Ln. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Resident Resident . �p,�,-�. &ee 5 6531 Silverspur Ln. 6551 Silverspur Ln. 1�521 Sit av�ore� Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 , ,E �� (,/} Oe&L17 G►Z(o4-7 0)2uLfS c,.. � C.tn-i�e-rs /�►�bie, dl�r� flaws T. C�rW�b�.✓-}- E L0 331 Ya-+'s �r I�1�►(c z Oar k n -� Gr. 6441 r� ps.h,Ch g2 cv N 7 OZtd-I'1 g:labels:form PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST B MAILING LABELS - March 19, 1998 Presidnt 1 Huntin rbor POA 10 FANS 16 H.B. Ch-a-m7btr4itCommerce P. O.Box 791 Carol Ann Wall 2210 Main Street,Sutt Sunset Beach,CA 90742 Chambers Newsletter Publishers Huntington Beach, CA 9264 P.O. Box 5458 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Juar+,ag n 2 William D.Holman 11 EdnalZittlebury 17 Orange Coun soc. of Realtors PLC Gldn St. o . Owners Leag. 25552 La Paz Road 23 Corporate Plaza,Suite 250 11021 Magnolia Blv . Laguna Hills,CA 92653 Newport Beach CA 92660-7912 Garden Grove, CA 92642 President 3 Mr.Tom Zanic 12 Pacific Coast Archaeological 18 Amigos De Bolsa Chica New Urban West Society,Inc. P. O. Box 3748 520 Broadway Ste. 100 P.O.Box 10926 Huntington Beach, CA 92605 Santa Monica,CA 90401 Costa Mesa,CA 92627 Attn:Jane Gothold Sunset Beach Community Assoc. 4 :Pr`e ., Hist. Society 13 County of Orange/EMA 19 Pat resident /O Newlan e Museum Michael M.Ruane,Dir. PO Box 215 820 Beach Blvd. P.O. Box 4048 Sunset Beach,CA 9074 - untington Beach,CA 92648 Santa Ana, CA 92702-4048 r 5 Chai erson 14 County of Orange/EMA 19 Huntington h Tomorrow Historic rces Bd. Thomas Mathews PO Box 865 Comm. Services Dep . P. O.Box 4048 Huntington Beach,CA 92 2000 Main St. Santa Ana,CA 92702-4048 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 juli.e Vandermost 6 Cou Aging 15 Planning Department 19 BIA- 1706 Orange Orange County EMA 9 Executive Circ 0 Huntington Beach,CA P.O.Box 4048 Irvine Ca 92714-6734 Santa Ana,CA 92702-4048 Richard Spicer 7 Jeff Metzel 16 County of Orange/EMA 19 SCAG Seacliff HOA Tim Miller 818 West 7th, 12th Floor 19391 Shady Harbor Circle P.O.Box 4048 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Santa Ana, CA 92702-4048 E.T.I. Corral 100 8 John Roe 16 Planning 1 . 20 Mary Bell Seacliff HOA City.of Costa Mesa 20292 Eastwood Cir. 19382 Surfdale Lane P. O.Box 1200 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Costa Mesa, CA 92628-1200 e ski, 9 Lou Mannone 16 P Dir. 21 Environmental o _ hairman Seacliff HOA City of Foun Valley 20021 Lawson Lane 19821 Ocean Bluff Circle 10200 Slater Ave. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 g:labels\phnlbls PUBLIC HARING NOTIFICATION CHECKLISA" MAILING LABELS - March 19, 1998 ning Director 22 Jerry�a n 29 Country View Estates HOA 37 City o nster HB City Elementa hool Dist. Gerald Chapman 8200 Westminster 20451 Craimer Lane 6742 Shire Circle Westminster, CA 92683 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 nning`Director 23 James Jones 30 HB Hamptons HOA 37 City o each Ode Elementary Keystone Pacific Prop.Mangmt. Inc. 211 Eight St. School district 4100 Newport Place, Suite 350 Seal Beach,CA 90740 17200 Pinehurst Lane Newport Beach,Ca 92660 Huntington Beach CA 92647 California Coastal Commission 24 azier 31 ally Graham 38 Theresa Henry Westminste 1 District Mea z Area South Coast Area Office 14121 Cedarwood Ave 5161 Gelding i 200 Oceangate, loth Floor Westminster CA 92683 Huntington Beach, CA _____Long Beach,CA 92802-4302 California Coastal Commission 24 I'atri ' och 32 Chery a wning 38 South Coast Area Office HB Union chool Disrict Meadowlark Are 200 Oceangate, loth Floor 10251 Yorktown Ave 16771 Roosevelt Lane Long Beach, CA 92802-4302 Huntington Beach,CA 9264 Huntington Beach, CA 9Z649 bert Joseph 25 C54 33 Koll Company 39 Caltrans i ict 12 730E Way#200 4343 Von Karman 2501 Pullman St-- t Tustin,CA 9268 Newport Beach,CA 92666 Santa Ana,CA 92705 Director 26 Goldenwest College 34 lid Waste Enf.Agy. At red Owens O.C.Healt Agency 15744 Go st St. P.O.Box 355 Huntington Beach 647 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Growth Coordinator 27 OC County Harbors,Beach 35 Huntington Post Office and Parks Dept. 6771 Warner Ave. P. O.Box 4048 Huntington Beach, CA 9264 Santa Ana,CA 92702-4048 Marc Ecker 28 Huntington Beach Mall 36 o alley Att Rogers-Laude Elementary Sc o strict 7777 Edinger 0 17210 Oak Street Huntington Beach CA 92 Fountain Valley CA 92708 Dr ane Dishno 29 Country View Estates HOA 37 HB City ary School Dist. Carrie Thomas PO Box 71 6642 Trotter Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92626 Huntington Beach CA 92648 g:label s\phnIbis 110-015-48 0 159-011-01 � 159-011-02 Signal Companies Inc Greg J. Wiese Donald William Noreen 4343 Von Karman Ave. 18011 Westlake Cir 18021 Westlake Cir Newport Beach CA 92660 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 9264% 159-011-03 159-011-04 159-011-05 Allen F. Leof John L. Pranin Delores Magnus 18031 Westlake Cir 2018 Jaybrook Dr. 1416 Victoria Ave. . Huntington Beach . CA 92648 Rancho Palos Verdes CA 90 Upland CA 91786 159-011-06 159-011-07 159-011-08 Edward H. Harrison Leif Thompson David Joel Sandler 18061 Westlake Cir 18071 Westlake Cir 18081 Westlake Cir Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 159-011-09 159-011-10 159-011-11 Muhs 1992 Partnership Eugene E. Conley Jack J. Quinton 6921 Loyola Dr. 18101 Westlake Cir 18111 Westlake Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92646 159-011-12 159-011-13 159-011-14 Ronald A. Hayes John G. Robbins Jimmie P. Reaves 18112 Freshwater Cir 18102 Freshwater Cir 18092 Freshwater Cir ___Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 9264$ 159-011.-15 159-011-16 159-011-17 William R. Saksa Vasile Valentin Tifrea Craig Susskind 18082 Freshwater Cir 18072 Freshwater Cir 18062 Freshwater Cir Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 9264$ 159-011-18 159-011-19 159-011-20 Timothy P. Turner Allan R. White John Michael Barrett 18052 Freshwater Cir P.O. Box 3053 18151 Riverside Cir _ _ Huntington Beach CA 92648 Big Bear Lake CA 92315 Huntington Beach CA 9264% 159-011-21 159-011-22 159-011-23 Jeffrey J: Millar Jeffrey J. Millar Margo Lynn Gayler 18022 Freshwater Cir 18022 Freshwater Cir 18011 Freshwater Cir Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 159-011-24 159-011-25 159-011-26 SZEKERESH Robert Wendy C. Cockley Charles N. Baker 18021 Freshwater Cir 18031 Freshwater Cir 18041 Freshwater Cir Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 9264 159-011-27 159-011-28 159-011-29 John Quilico Anthony C. Minniti Allen J. Stroh, 18051 Freshwater Cir P.O. Box 1862 18071 Freshwater Cir Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92648 159-011-30 159-011-31 159-011-32 Roger L. Garland Dale Robert Baker Alana HSUEH Ching Cheng 18081 Freshwater Cir 18091 Freshwater Cir 981 Paseo La Cresta Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Palos Verdes Estates CA gca�w 159-011-33 159-011-34 159-011-35 John L. Price Donald W. Claypool Richard R. Stevens 18111 Freshwater Cir 18112 Clearwater Cir 18102 Clearwater Cir Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-011-36 159-011-37 159-011-38 Harold Ronald Cook Michael T. Petrozzi Patricia Ann Haas 18092 Clearwater Cir 17422 Caspers Cir 18072 Clearwater Cir Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 9264 y 159-011-39 159-011-40 159-011-41 Herbert B. Coleman Abraham Asher Daniel Needham 18062 Clearwater Cir 18052 Clearwater Cir 18042 Clearwater Cir Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-011-42 159-011-43 159-011-44 Marian Violet Meyers John Michael Barrett William P. Wills 800 12Th Ave. 18151 Riverside Cir 18012 Clearwater Cir Sweet Home OR 97386 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-011-45 159-011-46 159-011-47 Robert D. Jensen Asele Rouchleau James E. Ellis. 18011 Clearwater Cir 18021 Clearwater Cir 18031 Clearwater Cir Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 9264 159-011-48 159-011-49 159-011-50 _ Roy M. Sarver Alector C. Ramos Margaret T. Bradley 18041 Clearwater Cir 18051 Clearwater Cir 18061 Clearwater Cir Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 9264 159-011-51 159-011-52 159-011-53 Robert J. Le Blanc Philip A. Gerrity Daniel Negrete 7159-.W. 91st St . 18081 Clearwater Cir' 18091 Clearwater Cir Los Angeles CA 90045 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 9264 g 159-011-54 159-011-55 159-071-01 Michael Loperfido Robert James Hill Alfonso R. Cracchiolo 18101 Clearwater Cir 18111 Clearwater Cir 6211 Newbury Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-071-02 159-071-03 159-071-04 Thomas R. Sosa Ronald Fox Barry O'Donnell 6221 Newbury Dr. 6231 Newbury Dr. 6241 Newbury Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-071-05 159-071-06 159-071-07 Gordon L. Carpenter Arthur F. Collins Steven I . Paczko 6251 Newbury Dr. 6271 Newbury Dr. P.O. Box 2329 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-071-08 159-071-09 159-071-10 Richard M. Ehret John G. Hatala Kenneth W. Carpenter 6291 Newbury Dr. 6301 Newbury Dr. 6311 Newbury Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92641 159-071-11 159-071-12 159-071-13 David W. Mollica Brentley M. Warren Edward Daniel Pelant 6331 Newbury Dr. 6341 Newbury Dr. 3020 Earlmar Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Los Angeles CA 90064 159-071-14 159-072-01 159-072-02 David A. Derush Robert D. Lundberg Jeffrey A. Moulton 6361 Newbury Dr. 6292 Newbury Dr. 6302 Newbury Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-072-03 159-072-04 159-072-05 Matt A. Cramer Robert V. Reider Peter F. Brust 63,12 Newbury Dr. 5795 Martin Rd. ; 6342 Newbury Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92647 Baldwin Park CA 91706 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-072-06 159-072-07 159-072-08 Ronald H. Bernhard Larry G. Munro Takanao Matsubara 6352 Newbury Dr. 6362 Newbury Dr. 6372 Newbury Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-072-09 159-072-10 159-072-11 Ying Thomason Wang Stanley D. Clark Dale B. Hagey 14544 Pebblewood Dr. 6361 Glenfox Dr. 6351 Glenfox Dr. North Potomac MD 20878 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-072-12 159-072-13 159-072-14 Brian C. Cowie Michael F. Cook Frank A. Ursich 6341 Glenfox Dr. 6331 Glenfox Dr. 6311 Glenfox Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 9264 159-072-15 159-072-16 159-073-01 Mark E. Daggett George S. Rubio Sean P. Keegan 6301 Glenfox Dr. 6291 Glenfox Dr. 6222 Newbury Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-073-02 159-073-03 159-073-04 Donahue Trust Viola J. Stewart David Rynerson 6232 Newbury Dr. 6252 Newbury Dr. 6272 Newbury Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL-COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 97-31: 1. The site plan received and dated February 27, 1998 shall be the conceptually approved layout. 2. A Grading Plan, prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted for review and approval prior to issuance of a grading permit. 3. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the Public Works Department shall: a. Prepare a drainage and erosion control plan for construction of the project. The plan shall include measures such as the following: • Diversion of off-site runoff away from the construction site; • Prompt revegetation of proposed landscape areas; • Perimeter sandbagging or temporary basins to trap sediment; and • Regular sprinkling of exposed soils during construction phases to minimize fugitive dust. b. Ensure that all grading and construction vehicles and equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped and maintained with effective muffler systems that use state of the art noise attenuation and that stockpiling and/or vehicle staging areas shall be located as far as practicable from sensitive noise receptors. c. Be responsible for the incorporation of measures to reduce construction related traffic congestion. Measures shall include: • Provision of rideshare incentives. • Provision of transit incentives for construction personnel. • Configuration of construction parking to minimize traffic interference. • Measures to minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes. • Use of a flagman to guide traffic when deemed necessary. d. Develop a truck and construction vehicle routing plan. This plan shall specify the hours in which transport activities can occur and methods to minimize construction related impacts to adjacent residents. e. Be responsible for assuring that construction vehicles are equipped with proper emission control equipment to substantially reduce emissions. 4. Landscape architectural plans shall be submitted to the Public Works Division Landscape Architect and approved prior to construction of project. Installation shall be in accordance with the Arboricultural and Landscape Standards and Specifications,the"Greenbook" for Public Works construction projects and the inspector's discretion. Attachment No. 2 Page 2 of 4 5. Prior to initiation of grading activities,the applicant shall comply with the following: a. Notify the City of Huntington Beach Fire and Police Departments of the duration and the extent of any street lane closures a minimum of 24-hours so that they can identify alternative emergency routes for the duration of the street closures, if necessary b. Contact all utility providers and identify the location of existing utility lines within the subject public rights-of way. The applicant shall notify the companies of trenching activities so that impacts to existing line and disruptions to existing service can be avoided. 6. A minimum of 10 days prior to start of construction activity,the Public Works Department shall: a. Post construction signs indicating the nature of construction, its expected duration and provide a contact name and phone number for the project. b. Submit to the Fire and Police Departments a traffic circulation plan identifying the routes which equipment and trucks will use to access and depart from the area. The plan shall use routes which will generate the minimum number of circulation conflicts with residential, pedestrian, bicycle and vehicle traffic. 7. During grading and construction, the Public Works Department shall: a. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems in all areas where vehicles travel to keep damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site; b. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day; c. Use low sulfur fuel (0.5%)by weight for construction equipment; d. Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days first stage smog alerts); e. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts. f. Be responsible for assuring that vehicle movement on any unpaved surface other than water trucks shall be terminated if wind speeds exceed 15 miles per hour. 8. A certified archeologist shall monitor the site during grading. In the event that significant cultural, paleontologic or archeological sites are unearthed, grading shall cease until proper documenting in accordance with EIR 89-1 and SRS 977 has been accomplished and, if necessary,proper re-burial in accordance with SRS 977 has been undertaken. 9. Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be completed prior to final inspection/within 12 months. Attachment No. 2 Page 3 of 4 10. A separate water meter and backflow prevention device shall be provided for the irrigation system. 11. The Public Works Department shall ensure the standards regarding pedestrian (including ADA) and bicycle safety along the perimeter sidewalks have been met. 12. Landscaping shall be provided in accordance with the adopted Holly Seacliff Specific Plan for Edwards Street and in accordance with the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance for Talbert Avenue. 13. Mitigation measures 5 -10, Page 63, from EIR 89-1 regarding Paleontological Resources shall be adhered to as appropriate. 14. All building spoils such as unusable lumber,wire,pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. Coastal Development Permit No. 97-31/Negative Declaration No. 97-25 shall not become effective until the ten day appeal period has elapsed. 2. Coastal Development Permit No. 97-3 1/Negative Declaration No. 97-25 shall become null and void unless exercised within one year of the date of final approval or such extension of time as may be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Department of Community Development a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. 3. The City Council reserves the right to revoke Coastal Development Permit No. 97-3 1/Negative Declaration No. 97-25,pursuant to a public hearing for revocation, if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance or Municipal Code occurs. 4. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, Building Division, and Fire Department as well as applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards, except as noted herein. 5. Construction shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. 6. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of$38.00 for the posting of the Notice of Exemption/Determination at the County of Orange Clerk's Office. The check shall be made out to the County of Orange and submitted to the Department of Community Development within two (2) days of the City Council's action. Attachment No. 2 Page 4 of 4 JIIL Council/Agency Meeting Held: 73�Apzu d' DDed/Continued to: A rove w ? 4604c1Y I Clerk's Signature PP 3 T Council Meetiras Date: April 6, 1998 Department ID Number: PW 98-031 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUEST FOR ACTION 0 SUBMITTED TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBE S N o�-i-<rn^. x-<nM c)o+-< SUBMITTED BY: RAY SILVER, Acting City AdministratorX fJ p D a-'rno n 1� _ _ PREPARED BY: MARYL D. SMITH, Acting Director of Public Works MELANIE FALLON, Director of Community Development r, /'�- SUBJECT: REVIEW OF PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION DECISION ON EDWARDS ST. IMPROVEMENTS AND REQUEST FOR APPROVALS OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 97-25 AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 97-31 Statement of Issue,Funding Source,Recommended Action,Alternative Action(s),Analysis,Environmental Status,Attachment(s) Statement of Issue: Plans are currently being prepared by PLC Land Company to widen Edwards Street from Ellis Avenue to Inlet Drive, from a two lane roadway to a four lane roadway. Included in the plans are street improvements for Talbert Avenue from Edwards Street to Fieldbury Lane. At the February 18, 1998, Public Works Commission meeting, the Commissioners recommended, 7-0, inclusion in the Edwards Street Improvement project, the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue. This action has been requested from several of the residents near the project, to be reviewed by the City Council. Additionally, a Coastal Development Permit and the Negative Declaration are required for the project and are included in the recommended action. Staff recommends'that the City Council uphold the Public Works Commission's decision and approve Coastal Development Permit No. 97-31 and Negative Declaration No. 97-25. Funding Source: The roadway widening and construction improvements are being funded via the Traffic Impact Fee program. PLC Land Company is designing and constructing these improvements in accordance with their obligation under the Holly Seacliff Development Agreement. Traffic impact fees collected from Holly Seacliff Specific Plan development will be used to pay for these street improvements. Recommended Action: PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Motion to: 1. Uphold the February 18, 1998, Public Works Commission support of a traffic signal at Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue; and REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: April 6, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PW 98-031 2. Approve Negative Declaration No. 97-25 (Attachment No. 4) with findings and mitigation measures (Attachment No. 2); and 3. Approve Coastal Development Permit No. 97-31 with findings and conditions of approval (Attachment No. 2) PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION ACTION ON FEBRUARY 18, 1998: The motion made by Commissioner Hartge, seconded by Vice-Chair Riffenburgh to proceed with the project as proposed and to include in the widening of Edwards Street, the installation of a full traffic signal at Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue; include a crosswalk across Edwards at the signal; a flashing beacon on Edwards Street north of Ellis Avenue, at the top of the hill; remove the existing crosswalk at Inlet Drive; install hard wire to over- ride signal, (Opticom); and install detector loops for Talbert Avenue for vehicle detection. Commissioner Gartland amended the motion to include pedestrian buttons at the traffic signal. The motion was approved 7-0. Alternative Action(s): 1. Approve Negative Declaration No. 97-25 and Coastal Development Permit No. 97- 31 with findings, mitigation measures and conditions of approval and require the removal of left turns from eastbound Talbert Avenue to northbound Edwards Street in lieu of a traffic signal at Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue. 2. Continue the Review of the Public Works Commission decision and Coastal Development Permit No. 97-31 and Negative Declaration No. 97-25 and direct staff accordingly. Analysis: ' A. PROJECT PROPOSAL Location: Edwards Street (segment north of Ellis Avenue and south of Inlet Drive, including intersection of Talbert Avenue and Edwards Street) and Talbert Avenue (segment from Edwards Street to Fieldbury Lane) Coastal Development Permit No. 97-31 represents a request to widen Edwards Street between Ellis Avenue and Inlet Drive to its ultimate width per the General Plan. Circulation Element and reduce the south side of Talbert Avenue between Edwards Street and Fieldbury Lane. Proposed street improvements in conjunction with Edwards Street construction includes widening the existing street area from its current two lane, 40 feet configuration, to four lanes with a width of 80 feet. The existing grade of Edwards Street will be reduced from approximately 12 percent. to a maximum grade of 8.8 percent in order to create a safer driving condition. Improvements include new curbs, gutters and sidewalks along Edwards Street and at the corner of Talbert Avenue and Edwards Street; at grade 0030589.02 -2- 03/25/98 8:24 AM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: April 6, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PW 98-031 north and southbound bike lanes; a one foot raised, landscaped median island; new street lighting; drainage improvements; the relocation of existing 66kV electrical lines; the undergrounding of existing above ground 12kV electrical lines and the relocation of an existing underground Southern California Edison fuel line. At the intersection of Edwards Street and Ellis Avenue, a traffic signal will be constructed. Also, a 36 inch diameter pipe will be installed below grade as a drainage facility across Edwards Street south of Talbert Avenue. This pipe will also serve as a future wildlife corridor at some point in the future, if the private land to the west of the project is reverted to public land. Proposed street improvements in conjunction with Talbert Avenue construction include transitioning the south side of Talbert Avenue from an 80 foot right-of-way to a total curb to curb width of 40 feet, curb, gutter and sidewalk. At the intersection of Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue, the Public Works Commission and staff recommend the construction of a full traffic signal. This would also require the installation of a flashing beacon for northbound vehicles on Edwards Street, north of Ellis Avenue. B. PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION MEETINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Staff held a public meeting at the January 21, 1998, Public Works Commission meeting to consider subject project. At the meeting, staff recommended the removal of left turns from eastbound Talbert Avenue to northbound Edwards Street, due to unsafe turning and sight distance issues, and the low volume of vehicles making left turns. Approximately seventy people attended and twelve people provided public comments opposing staffs recommendation. No one spoke in favor of staffs recommendation. The Commission continued the item and directed staff to evaluate the possibility of maintaining the left turns from eastbound Talbert Avenue to northbound Edwards Street and providing pedestrian access by installing a traffic signal at this location and a flashing beacon on Edwards Street, north of Ellis Avenue. Also, the Commissioners requested staff to look into the feasibility of installing a Wildlife Corridor across Edwards Street in response to Commissioner Smith's request. Staff is proposing to install a dual purpose reinforced concrete pipe, (36 inches in diameter), for storm drainage and for the wildlife corridor. Because the City does not have any jurisdiction over the property on the west side of Edwards Street, (privately owned by the Koll Company), staff is recommending to install a grate on the pipe on the west side and to close off the east end of the pipe until the land on the west side of the project becomes public. A second public meeting was held at the February 18, 1998, Public Works Commission meeting. Staff reported that it would be feasible to install a traffic signal at the intersection of Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue. Five people provided public comments opposing the installation of a traffic signal at Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue and recommending the elimination of left turns from eastbound Talbert Avenue to northbound Edwards Street. Six people provided public comments in favor of the installation of the traffic signal as staff had 0030589.02 -3. 03/25/98 8:24 AM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: April 6, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PW 98-031 recommended. The Commission unanimously directed staff to proceed with the Edwards Street improvement project with the installation of the full traffic signal and flashing beacon. There were no comments in favor of staffs recommendation regarding the initial design proposed at the January 21, 1998, Public Works Commission meeting. C. REVIEW OF PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION DECISION On March 2, 1998, Bart J. Hollander spoke at the City Council meeting regarding his concerns for the subject project. He was requested to send a letter to the City Council. Staff received his letter dated March 9, 1998, (Attachment No. 3). Mr. Hollander is requesting the City Council to review the Public Works Commission decision to install the traffic signal at Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue. He would like to see the Public Works Commissioners recommendation be changed to eliminate the traffic signal at Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue and to eliminate the eastbound Talbert Avenue to northbound Edwards Street vehicular movement. D. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION Traffic Signal Alternative Staff conducted a thorough investigation as directed on January 21, 1998, by the Public Works Commissioners. Turning movement counts were taken at the intersections of Edwards Street/ Talbert Avenue, Edwards Street / Inlet Drive, and Edwards Street /Varisity Drive/Central Park Drive, (Attachment No. 5). A traffic signal warrant analysis was conducted for the intersection of Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue. That analysis demonstrated that the intersection of Edwards Street at Talbert Avenue, (keeping eastbound Talbert Avenue to northbound Edwards Street left turns), met the traffic signal warrants and a traffic signal should be considered. Installing a traffic signal at the intersection of Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue will allow pedestrians to cross Edwards Street to Central Park with a protected movement. To assure emergency response, the traffic signal at Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue, the flashing beacon. at the top of the hill for northbound vehicles on Edwards Street and the traffic signal at Edwards Street and Ellis Avenue will be tied together to the proposed fire station on Edwards Street approximately 300 feet south of Ellis Avenue. When a fire unit responds to an emergency from the fire station, the traffic signals will provide a green indication for northbound Edwards Street at Ellis Avenue and at Talbert Avenue. The flashing beacon will also serve as an advance pre-emption for other units responding to the emergency other than the ones from the fire station. 0030589.02 -4- 03/25/98 8:24.AM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: April 6, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PW 98-031 Elimination of Left Turns Alternative Traffic restricted from the left turn movement on Talbert Avenue at Edwards Street, would most likely use Varsity Drive to go north on Edwards Street, using an existing four-way Stop controlled intersection. The intersection of Edwards Street at Varsity Drive/Central Park Drive is on the Traffic Signal Priority List. Project Schedule The project is expected to begin on May 6, 1998 with an estimated completion date of November 24, 1998. The project will be delayed due to the scheduling of the relocation of the Southern California Edison 66kV electrical lines. Only Southern California Edison crews are able to relocate their facilities and they are presently busy with projects located elsewhere in the County. (See PLC Land Development Company letter dated -March 13, 1998, Attachment No. 6) Environmental Status: Staff has reviewed the environmental assessment and determined that no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed project that could not be mitigated to a level of insignificance with proper design and engineering. Subsequently, Negative Declaration No. 97-25 (Attachment No. 4) was prepared with mitigation measures pursuant to Section 240.04 of the HBZSO and the provisions of the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA). The Department of Community Development advertised draft Negative Declaration No. 97- 25 for twenty (20) days commencing on March 12, 1998 and ending on March 31, 1998. No comments, either verbal or written have been received, at the time this request for Council action was prepared. Subsequent communications will be supplied to the City Council at the April 6tii meeting. Prior to any action on the review of the Public Works Commission's decision of February 18, 1998, and Coastal Development Permit No. 97-31, it is necessary for the City Council to review and act on Negative Declaration No. 97-25. Staff, in its initial study of the project, is recommending that the negative declaration be approved with findings and mitigation measures. I 0030589.02 -5- 03/25/98 8:24 AM ti REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: April 6, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PW 98-031 Attachment(s): NumberCity Clerk's Page 1 Location Map 2 Findings and Conditions of Approval for Coastal,Development Permit No. 97-31/Negative Declaration No. 97-25 3 Letter Requesting Review from Bart J. Hollander dated March 9, 1998 4 Negative Declaration No. 97-25 5 Turning Movement Counts . PLC Letter dated March 13, 1998, Construction Schedule 7 Public Works Commission, Request for Action, dated February 18, 1998 and January 21, 1998 RCA Author: TAE 0030589.02 -6- 03/25/98 8:24 AM s� A e Attachment No,, 1 SLATER AVE. IF - a o Li z w 0 o 7 T \ NLET D J t. HUNTINGTON �oGN CENTRAL PARK PROJECT SITE ELLIS AVE. 3 N o O o Q Z � O o � = W co OF cV OJ= � NOT TO SCALE _ 0 CL �1 GARFIELD AVE. I E 0 a [PlotStomp Evol] G:\ACAD\KRIEGER\EDWHILL LOCATION MAP J. 'D �.8 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH - DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS . � �. . q � - - )S �\ O © ' © ATTACHMENT NO. 2 - FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL FOR NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO 97-25: 1. The Negative Declaration No. 97-25 has been prepared in compliance with Article 6 of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) Guidelines. It was advertised and available for a public comment period of twenty(20)days. Any comments received during the comment period were considered by the City Council prior to action on the Negative Declaration and Coastal Development Permit No. 97-31. 2. Mitigation measures, incorporated into the conditions of approval, avoid or reduce the project's effects to a point where clearly no significant effect on the environment will occur. 3. There is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the City Council that the project, as mitigated through the conditions of approval for Coastal Development Permit No. 97-31 will have a significant effect on the environment. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL-COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 97-31: 1. Coastal Development Permit No. 97-31 for the Edwards Street improvement project, as proposed or as modified by conditions of approval, conforms with the General Plan, including the Local Coastal Program. The street improvement program is consistent with and implements the City's General Plan Circulation Element by widening Edwards Street to its ultimate width and constructing the associated improvements of curb, gutter, sidewalk,etc. 2. The project is consistent with the requirements of the CZ Overlay District, the base zoning district, as well as other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code. The project is consistent with City standards for,street improvements. 3. At the time of occupancy the proposed development can be provided with infrastructure in a manner that is consistent with the Local Coastal Program. This project will implement the City's Local Coastal Program by improving the street system in the vicinity of coastal resources. All necessary infrastructure will be provided. 4. The development conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. The project will increase public access opportunities by fully improving Edwards Street between Inlet and Ellis and by installing sidewalk along both sides of the street. p Attachment No. 2 . Z . Page I of 4 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL-COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 97-31: 1. The site plan received and dated February 27, 1998 shall be the conceptually approved layout. 2. A Grading Plan, prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted for review and approval prior t6lssuance of a grading permit. 3. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the Public Works Department shall: a. Prepare a drainage and erosion control plan for construction of the project. The plan shall include measures such as the following: • Diversion of off-site runoff away from the construction site; • Prompt revegetation of proposed landscape areas; • Perimeter sandbagging or temporary basins to trap sediment; and • Regular sprinkling of exposed soils during construction phases to minimize fugitive dust. b. Ensure that all grading and construction vehicles and equipment,fixed or mobile, shall be equipped and maintained with effective muffler systems that use state of the art noise attenuation and that stockpiling and/or vehicle staging areas shall be located as far as practicable from sensitive noise receptors. i c. Be responsible for the incorporation of measures to reduce construction related traffic congestion. Measures shall include: • Provision of rideshare incentives. • -Provision of transit incentives for construction personnel. • Configuration of construction parking to minimize traffic interference. • Measures to minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes. • Use of a flagman to guide traffic when deemed necessary. d. Develop a truck and construction vehicle routing plan. This plan shall specify the hours in which transport activities can occur and methods to minimize construction related impacts to adjacent residents. e. Be responsible for assuring that construction vehicles are equipped with proper emission control equipment to substantially reduce emissions. 4. Landscape architectural plans shall be submitted to the Public Works Division Landscape Architect and approved prior to construction of project. Installation shall be in accordance with the Arboricultural and Landscape Standards and Specifications, the"Greenbook"for Public Works construction projects and the inspector's discretion. Attachment No. 2 Page 2 of 4) 5. Prior to initiation of grading activities,the applicant shall comply with the following: a. Notify the City of Huntington Beach Fire and Police Departments of the duration and the extent of any street lane closures a minimum of 24-hours so that they can identify alternative emergency routes for the duration of the street closures, if necessary b. Contact all utility providers and identify the location of existing utility lines within the subject public rights-of way. The applicant shall notify the companies of trenching activities so that impacts to existing line and disruptions to existing service can be avoided. 6. A minimum of 10 days prior to start of construction activity, the Public Works Department shall: a. Post construction signs indicating the nature of construction, its expected duration and provide a contact name and phone number for the project. b. Submit to the Fire and Police Departments a traffic circulation plan identifying the routes which equipment and trucks will use to access and depart from the area. The plan shall use routes which will generate the minimum number of circulation conflicts with residential,pedestrian, bicycle and vehicle traffic. 7. During grading and construction,the Public Works Department shall: a. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems in all areas where vehicles travel to keep damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site; b. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day; c. Use low sulfur fuel (0.5%)by weight for construction equipment; d. Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days first stage smog alerts); e. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts. f. Be responsible for assuring that vehicle movement on any unpaved surface other than water trucks shall be terminated if wind speeds exceed 15 miles per hour. 8. A certified archeologist shall monitor the site during grading. In the event that significant cultural, paleontologic or archeological sites are unearthed, grading shall cease until proper documenting in accordance with EIR 89-1 and SRS 977 has been accomplished and,if necessary,proper re-burial in accordance with SRS 977 has been undertaken. 9. Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be completed prior to final inspection/within 12 months. Attachment No. 2 y Page 3 of 4 10. A separate water meter and backflow prevention device shall be provided for the irrigation system. 11. The Public Works Department shall ensure the standards regarding pedestrian(including ADA) and bicycle safety along the perimeter sidewalks have been met. 12. Landscaping shall be provided in accordance with the adopted Holly Seacliff Specific Plan for Edwards Street and in accordance with the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance for Talbert Avenue. 13. Mitigation measures 5 -10,Page 63, from EIR 89-1 regarding Paleontological Resources shall be adhered to as appropriate. 14. All building spoils such as unusable lumber,wire,pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. Coastal Development Permit No. 97-3l/Negative Declaration No. 97-25 shall not become effective until the ten day appeal period has elapsed. 2. Coastal Development Permit No. 97-3I/Negative Declaration No. 97-25 shall become null and void unless exercised within one year of the date of final approval or such extension of time as may be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Department of Community Development a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. 3. The City Council reserves the right to revoke Coastal Development Permit No. 97-3 1/Negative Declaration No. 97-25,pursuant to a public hearing for revocation, if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance or Municipal Code occurs. 4. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, Building Division, and Fire Department as well as applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards, except as noted herein. 5. Construction shall be limited to Monday- Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. 6. The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of$38.00 for the posting of the Notice of Exemption/Determination at the County of Orange Clerk's Office. The check shall be made out to the County of Orange and submitted to the Department of Community Development within two (2)days of the City Council's action. 13 Attachment No. 2 Page 4 of 4 Attachment. No. 3 14 I y� Bart J. Hollander 18152 Lakepoint Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92647 R E C E I V E D Home: 714/848-7890 DEPT.OF PUBLIC WORKS Office: 310/638-2842 MAR 13 1998 Huntington Beach City Council HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA Huntington Beach City Hall 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach,CA 92648 March 9, 1998 Dear City Council Members: At the Huntington Beach City Council Meeting on March 2, 199 8 I spoke during the Public Comments portion of the Agenda and presented my views against the traffic signal that was approved by the Public Works Commission for the intersection of Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue. At the conclusion of my presentation I was asked by the Council to reiterate my position in a letter,which I am now submitting for your review. Background on this issue begins with the Public Works Commission Meeting on January 21,•1998 in which the Commission presented its plan for road improvements between Ellis Avenue and Inlet Drive. The proposed improvements included widening Edwards Street from two lanes to four(Edwards is presently four lanes in its entirety except for this section),lowering the grade on Edwards hill by approximately two degrees, and eliminating the left-hand turn from eastbound Talbert Ave. to northbound Edwards St. Current traffic control at the intersection consists of a stop sign for eastbound traffic on Talbgrt and a turn-in lane for northbound Edwards traffic onto westbound Talbert. I believe that the Commission's rationale for the elimination of the left turn was concern over increased traffic occurring on Edward's Street due to the Holly-Seacliff development south of Garfield Ave. At this meeting a number of homeowners,of which I was one,voiced their disapproval for the elimination of the TalberMwards left-turn. Reasons for the disapproval primarily centered on residents' concerns over the diversion of traffic onto Varsity Drive and Fieldbury Lane that would result from this elimination. Additionally,there was . concern over increased speeds on Edwards hill that may result from the improvements, especially with the intersections of Wet/Edwards and Varsity/Edwards used as pedestrian crossing points to Central Park on the east side of Edwards. Unspoken was the desire to avoid the loss of this turning option at the intersection. Also,a number of vocal , % residents,.of which I was not one,expressed their desire to have a full traffic signal installed at the Talbert/Edwards intersection as a means of retaining their left-turn. The Commission promised to further study the issue and present alternatives at the next meeting. Huntington Beach City Council Page 2 The next Public Works Meeting took place on February 18, 1998. At that meeting,the Commission's recommended action was the installation of a traffic signal (Full-Signal)at the Edwards/Talbert intersection at a cost of$135,000. This proposal would include installation of a flashing signal for northbound traffic on Edwards to warn them of the approaching signal at the bottom of the hill and the lowering of the current 45 mph speed limit on the hill to 40 mph. The two other alternative actions considered were installation of a"Half-Signal"at. Edwards/Talbert and an"All-Way Stop"at the intersection. Remarkably,alternatives not even considered included the Commission's original proposal for elimination of the left- turn or even a proposal to leave the intersection"As-is". Prior to Staff s review of the alternatives and overview of a traffic study conducted as research for the proposed alternatives,a number of residents again spoke their opinions to the Commission,both in favor and against the installation of the traffic signal. At the conclusion of public comments and the staff review,the Commission discussed the recommended action and voted for its approval. It seemed obvious that approval of the ' recommended action was a foregone conclusion,as very little if anything was said regarding alternative actions or residents' concerns regarding the signal installation. My concern is that the Commission may have been shell-shocked over the negative response at the previous meeting and acted without thoroughly considering the research. As I stated earlier,elimination of the left turn is the key issue. Residents don't-want to be inconvenienced and they don't want additional traffic on alternative routes that may impact residential neighborhoods. There is no question that elimination of the left-turn will add traffic somewhere. It has to because a route will be eliminated. The question is how much increased traffic will the alternative routes receive. The vocal residents expressing traffic concerns resided on Fieldbury Lane and Varsity Drive. A look at a map(I have enclosed two maps for your convenience)reveals that Varsity would no doubt receive a substantial percentage of the diverted traffic. However, Varsity is a street that has no homes fronting it and should not be considered a residential street in the strictest of terms. Contrary to Fieldbury residents' concerns,this street would not'receive anything more than a token amount of additional traffic. It is just not logical for Talbert traffic to divert onto the residential streets of Fieldbury, Glenfox, Lakepoint and Inlet in order to make a left-turn onto Edwards. Varsity is a much easier alternative for virtually all traffic. As an additional point not mentioned at all,however, is that Springdale Street would likely relieve some of the traffic that originates to its west. In summary,the issue boils down to in the event of the left-tum being eliminated at Edwards/Talbert,how much additional traffic would be diverted to Varsity and is this increased traffic even a true residential concern?. To shed light on this issue,I refer to the Turning Movement Study prepared by Staff as part of its research. This study measured traffic movements on the dates indicated during . 2 . 16 D - Huntington Beach City Council Page 3 the hours of 6:00-8:00 am, 11:30-1:30 pm and 4:00-7:00 pm at three potentially impacted intersections: • Edwards Street/Talbert Avenue (February 5, 1998) • Edwards Street/Varsity Drive (February 11, 1998) • Edwards Street/Inlet Drive (February 12, 1998) Although traffic was measured in all directions,the only traffic relevant is the eastbound traffic onto Edwards Street, as this is the only traffic that would be impacted. The results are as follows: Right Thru Left Total Eastbound Talbert/North Edwards: 1,351 (87%) NA 194(13%) 1,545 Eastbound Varsity/North Edwards: 93 (22%) 40(10%) 286(68%) 419 8 Eastbound Inlet/North Edwards: 59 (50%) 7(6%) 52(44%) 118 What this study shows is that during these peak usage hours,only 1941eft-turns were made at the Talbert/Edwards intersection out of a total of 1.545 turns. Also,the left-turn traffic at Varsity,which already has a 4-way stop sign that was petitioned for by the residents,outnumbers the left-turn traffic at Talbert. Since the left-turn traffic on Talbert is the only traffic that would divert,the potential for increased traffic on Varsity is clearly not a startling amount and not an amount that I believe should warrant the installation of a traffic signal. This traffic issue aside,I would like to again refer to the other two alternatives proposed by,Staff—a"Half-Signal"and an"All-Way Stop". Reasons why staff concluded that the Half-Signal proposal was not warranted were not given,but the reason for the All-Way Stop was. This reason was that this intersection has not had enough accidents to warrant an All-Way Stop. It states that the intersection has had only one accident in the last twelve months and an intersection needs at least five in order to warrant an All-Way Stop. It also states the accident was not of a type that would have even been corrected by an all-way stop. In effect,the report is stating that the intersection is too safe to warrant this option. With that in mind,I find ithard to understand how a Full-Signal can be warranted when an All-Way Stop is not. For these reasons,I believe that the installation of a Full-Signal is not warranted and the Commission's original proposal to eliminate the left-turn at Talbert/Edwards-is clearly preferable. However,I further believe that there is an alternative that is preferable to . either of these alternatives and is additionally an alternative that would be agreeable to virtually all parties. That alternative would be to leave the current traffic control at the intersection unchanged. - Huntington Beach City Council Page 4 My arguments for this alternative are as follows: 1. Although all residents are safety conscious and concerned with speed generated on the downhill portion of Edwards,the intersection is currently a safe intersection,in fact so safe that it does not meet requirement standards for an All-Way Stop. 2. The intersection will become even safer following the road improvements. The lowering of the grade of Edwards hill by approximately two degrees in conjunction with the reduced speed limit from 45 mph to 40 mph will add safety to all traffic. 3. The installation of a traffic signal would increase risk to the intersection by forcing stops on what will still be a relatively steep grade and encouraging southbound traffic to speed up in order to"beat the signal"before making the drive up the hill. The Commission acknowledges the added risk with its direction to add a flashing beacon on Edwards to warn traffic of the approaching signal. 4. In the future,if traffic on Edwards ever did increase to the point where risk was increased for a left-turn from Talbert to Edwards,a protected turn-in lane could be added on Edwards Street. . I appreciate the City Council's time in reviewing my request to change the Public Works Commission's direction to add a Full-Signal at the Talbert/Edwards intersection. I believe that my proposal is a more sensible solution and would be acceptable to all residents. I would welcome the opportunity to discuss this issue further with either the Public Works Commission or the City Council. Please advise me of the outcome of my request or any additional steps involved in the review process. Very truly yours, Bart J. Hollander cc: Daryl Smith,Acting Director of Public Works Enclosures i Ig r �. Attachmf ent No. 4 � q ............:..... ...... ...... Alm :::;;:};r•;;:y.: .. :4.... ::................ .... ......v ...... -.. }. W h...:n.....nvx.n...4..4n..von.�'in.........v..vr: v u.Y:Y.:�v:•}}.:..::.:;..n ::•t:..:t.. v$::. »}rnrn::,.:::,•:n : »fr.:} '�::.rrtk?�``;:�'•':k't''r.%?: +.•r •:..t...%f::'•:k-Y}:•::.:r...at::L:{{{..........f:.... {.r?}{{k;{.:... . . . a.:>::..'-. :. J.. :: .... .. :... ?:..tv,•::::•.�... J.:k'::i$'>{.?:'.':�::'t::; ......»........w ..rY. .... .. ... ... ... .. ..::J.::: '';R..: A::{`;':}Y:tt.Y:b:-}.^•.•.rr ,.:C•... r.:k{.; .. .:.....v. .v......v. ..r. �.r.. ...:.. .L..... .... .. .... .v. Y.. .- n. : is {: .- r..n. ...... ....... .. ... .. .. ...... .. v, ...: .�. :.: i>:;Cv.uv:.}Y:::y,.v:.v+{x:::tr'i:?{•},:•}}:{4y.Y:{:k:}{. tr.:.>..:::.n r.. .:v/. .r3[v....:}4•.v:.v. $.. 1iti,...4:....•$:::.:•x..vxvv. ,;;}.. ...k:.i'4::k:i::$}::::v :.;{.vv; ?{ ..n........n ..r. ti..:..:.ur...::.. :.h.....v ..{}}J:•}:•...:: .tr:Yr:fr... ..:.i'i-.}}`::i�'4.: ".'Y'.: `}. �{'� � ..}..n:.;r................::ki$n:tr.{••}::•J'•:Y•JJ':'.u,.».. r:nv.f$;n}:v:.{•......:•:::::.+..Yr.:nx'•.?•..,.. .v.... .v..,.�.....-��..��. .. .. .. �. .. i: ��:. v.vt..,...n; n......• :..... .. .n.:.. ... ........v...... ....n:'iF.•;+.•}:•}Y:-•.w::{yJ»:::n.::::.:w.v:;:;:nvY::;4.v}:n$:•.v::::•i•h• :n}}•.:::...v.........\:k.:::::.v,?kv;.,...;}:::n:':•.v w,v..:.: };v,h..:.vw.v.v::.........r:•:tb':,$••;•: .. .]�tr,w.•:.}, -.{•..... r• n.,... ..h.....v.... u .......,....: .... .. ». ,.. h}..v x....:{v..r...... .. v r.v. .nvu .v.... ,v... ..r...v...k'::..K ..:•.:b.• v.}:•:}:::::::J:: } : ...r:».. ..}.:..»r.,n...».r.>...n. }',....\. ,.»x.x.n. ..rx;v;,?{w;;...,....rn..•:•:r:::::::.•.:?:J:•Y J}X?b f{......r:..., , ..::{:::.r. "J:.r:::.:.•..... ......}..}r..:}.••,fvm:.xw......}:rn2:....C::m....::}c..:: x>.,v::::vv,.»:::............:x:::,:.i.,uJ}'•$:'{....... .. $Y ii•}w:•i::•}r4}$Y.r..i..... ...... •ff:�r$u.:..... ....•:-.v•:::w:/:v;•.v:::.,'3,..{.:.x{f:...v..••. .,:•.... u..v...x........+r....n}i.........v..}n.,....•v...................n... .t:-.?.n......+nn..v::•. v::::::::.vv, ?n h .......}..::..w..::.....:..r.... .. .,......... .vr .......»....v.....................n.....v......:....: .;......,,....:. ..�{., .4....... .:n.v}:•::::b..., .::$.:4•:{{.:}:.}'}:i{{{{» ti.JYv:• ...tr...tr:•:$.::k•.::............r........v. :. ...r....{ A..\::}..:}.;:r.;{.,...,.. v. :. '•.}•:{>.: ::::?•r'•: n.. i. r ..............n....r..}...r. .v .4{• ...... vn.. r. u. ..w.v. ... ... ...n. ..' ... ,............r......,• .pp...v .....,4.v....»:..:r :... .. . .,,.:. :.. :r• b}}`:kkk:•::k:$R::k}k:}i}}Y:tr:k::{.t:.}. :...Y}.. ... .......:••...\..........v.-..r.:{1.$... .........:.:.. ......,....... :.0 .. ... ,n.}:�4?' i:;:l:$:.r•:'}$$:vty $:..yy,•.{...}: .f.++ w............ .......n.:....0}..v...::.{..vk.v.,nr... n.m ...... ., .. .. ». ... : :l'•r,.4.:v-4:.:b:{•:. ::.{{.:v4v vv:}::::w::.v:ra':'{.•:$r:::.r•... hJ.. ..try rev; .$}:}; i,}}:{::.Y n- ..•.Y:.:k:}}:t??{tr. :::•,,..+.t:.•::.;;,.:...:r..:rJ ...:. ..'?:{. ^,.: .;.,.:.. ib$?n n}}..r. Rv f.. ..f.-..r:wY•.. .tv{:•.vn:••...::::.;}}}}:.�:.:iv�4'-}}:+{.:}{:::$r•::i• ::•}Yk•:4hu .v .»::n.n.... .....r. - nu.. ..... ..v{;f.... v{... f:•d, .: .,... :. :ntr;}•.n... :tr•{..r :+Lfk ::& K........+r...:.r....2.....::•:?.....}..•:.. ,.r:... .. .,}...n.•:.......-,....,� ..... ...{. ..:.:.{k. ... ..f\�..: N$:C. n,..n..r ,,.t.1.•:`•:: .fn.f........ .........r.,..r,..t.:.r. w ., ...t.. ..,.:,..... ....�.��r.. .... .... ... ..',.+{ ..:k•r.. ,.+ri:•r'• ..x.:...n•::•t2•:{. .•....}.. ., ..•... r ,... ..:.. :..:. ... .. :::. ::.,•,v r,'(kJS::t:•:,•.?,ru^C;.,:'::o}y}.`•t..:{{.J:. ,.:.:�.k..::. .�•$::.::+.,.•t:.t.c,,rb.,L :h t. .. ..tr.}{{Sw.v}:.}. .{,}..bx...}$,k,:•..}:fif ..,k.•.}:• ,•.:..;}... .}?::•'.:•;•.}:{v. ..}}::.:•.: , ..unit•}:kx:..;{^;h: .b...:•:;;:.;{.:r.. f.l....'}ktv::.,• ..tr.3. .!•.: tr:2: ..{. »w r. .;� .Y•.,..:{.{::{.......,R:,uYttnx ... ....... .ih ..::::n•,,••::: ., .L:.�.$:.•:h•.:..4 v:{•::},}.v:.�•}r}..,u�4..:,t.p.�.Xcth:.:...�-'£•}• ...,y'4,�.:•tr}�::f'r,t..y qq}}rh,•.ts`p•::{•::• .•..:.Y.::Y:Y.,.`•?:k�:$':.•::k•r t:{•:k,.,...... :.t4},;. v...k,.. ....{.. },.,.•}C-.....:vv:n... ..{;}... v:\.,. .. � }:.....{v .v },YY... M..}... ...ry,.t.;} .: .. .v. ..:. .. n v':v. ... ..}i-. ,:utitr$;: ` n.: ..'.$t:'h`.u• ..;n::�{:x };:{{}}:n}i: ., .;,•;v}x:Y:?:.v.})k... ..•"..•tr:.Y»::.:':v:{vv/,.:.. �. ;::.. ::. .. .. ..v .. •. � -..: :'. ... i4'.:•::L:.}.ik:$�'k;'•kk:}:{v:}.}::4.is}k:;>.;v:±:}•. �f ::4.:v.:'r..t+.vtrv,•.v::::`.hC•n. .. .. ..{f. ...r.:::r:.{w,.{vv..nx•. ., ::�u r..4.•ry}4 ry.:. v•:v�R�N •. :•..�.....l?..... ..... ..f... �:$ Y•'.:. :• :.n..4r,..:.::•.::.,:•{tr>:•..•{:•...r.{....,..tr:.:-: I�.:'.... ...........�......... .r.. ..� ... ........ i' ... .. ..r:c M.N. k • .. .rn...:r::.}:{•::::\..r.............r...:..s:::.:�•. :.... ..�...:•:::::::.:,..:-.. .....}C .r.:::-. :....,:•:.:•:rY..:•,.>.;:�::r.:.., ,.:...,}i.::...$:::r:.:v:::r.J::.... •:� : ,�.....,,.... .v,:,,.,...{:r:}...,:...... ....��c }:va•:.:u,•,w::.:: }•r. .::..,....:....:.... ..::.:'•`.•:•}:•:•:•::::i.. •::�:n •:::✓,.{...{..,,......+�•-,-� ........:............J::::•:::.},{C,}.:::::.......................................................... .• • ..........................n............ rn}v:J}:{?Y,4::kkv:•:{.::w:}:4:Gi... 1. PROJECT TITLE: EDWARDS STREET FULL RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENTS AND TALBERT AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS Concurrent Entitlements: Coastal Development Permit No. 97-31 2. LEAD AGENCY: City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 i Contact: Catherine O'Hara,Project Planner Phone: (714) 536-5271 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Edwards Street(Segment north of Ellis Avenue and South of Inlet Drive, including intersection of Talbert and Edwards)and Talbert Avenue (segment from Edwards to Fieldbury Lane). 4. PROJECT PROPONENT: City of Huntington Beach Department of Public Works 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Contact: Terri Elliott Phone: (714) 536-5580 5. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Public Right-of-way with the designations of RL-7 (Low Density Residential) and OS-P (Open Space Park). 6. ZONING: Public right-of-way with the zoning designation of RL (Low Density Residential) and RL-CZ (Low Density Residential/Coastal Zone) on'the west side of Edwards Street and OS-PR-O (Open Space Parks and Recreation Subdistrict/Oil Overlay) on the east side of Edwards; RL CZ on the south side of Talbert Avenue. 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This environmental assessment analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed widening of Edwards Street between Ellis Avenue and Inlet Drive to its ultimate width per the General Plan Circulation Element and the reduction of the south side of Talbert Avenue between Edwards Street and Fieldbury Lane. Proposed street improvements in conjunction with Edwards Street construction include widening the existing street area from its current two lane,40 foot configuration,to four lanes with a width of 80 feet, plus two foot wide transition area on both sides. The existing grade of the road will be reduced from approximately 12 percent to a maximum grade of 8.8 percent to design for a safer driving condition. Improvements include new curbs, gutters and sidewalks along Edwards and at the corner of Talbert Avenue and Edwards; at grade north and south bound bike lanes; a twelve inch raised, landscaped median and parkway; new street lighting; drainage improvements;the relocation of existing above ground electric T)- 2 ' 2° utilities to points further west from where they currently exist,placing underground existing 12 kv electrical lines; the relocation of an existing under ground Southern California Edison fuel line, and the installation of a wildlife corridor/passageway under Edwards Street. (See Attachment 5). Proposed street improvements in conjunction with Talbert Avenue construction include transitioning the south side of Talbert from an 80 foot right-of-way to a total curb to curb width of 40 feet, curb, gutter and sidewalk. Two alternatives are analyzed for the intersection of Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue: Alternative 1 - This alternative includes the consruction of a traffic signal at the intersection and a crosswalk across Talbert Avenue on the west side and across Edwards Street on the north side. Left turns will be maintained for both northbound Ewards Street to west bound Talbert Avenue and eastbound Talbert Avenue to northbound Edwards Street.. The crosswalk on Ewards Street at inlet Drive will be removed. A flashing beacon will be installed on Edwards Street north of Ellis Avenue to alert northbound vehicles of upcoming signal. The signals and beacon will be wired to permit emergency pre-emption for the proposed fire station on Edwards Street approximately 300 feet south of Ellis Avenue. Alternative 2 -This alternative does not include a traffic signal at the intersection of Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue. Left turns from eastbound Talbert Avenue northbound Edwards Street would be prohibited. The left turning traffic would instead use Varsity Avenue. Construction is anticipated to last approximately 120 days. Related Environmental Documentation The proposed street improvements are consistent with the City's adopted Circulation Element and Holly Seacliff Specific Plan,Development Agreement and Environmental Impact Report(EIR)No. 89-1. The proposed improvements will bring the subject street portion into conformance with the City's Circulation Plan where it is designated as a Primary Arterial. The improvements will also serve to help mitigate traffic impacts projected to be generated by build out of the adopted Holly Seacliff Specific Plan as identified in EIR No. 89-1. Environmental Assessment No. 97-25 analyzes the project specific and potential cumulative impacts of the proposed Edwards Street widening and is consistent with the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan EIR 89-1 mitigation and monitoring plan. This EA document identifies applicable conditions of approval and mitigation measures (Attachments 3 and 4)to ensure that all potential impacts from the proposed Edwards Street widening are reduced to a level less than significant. 8. OTHER AGENCIES WHOSE APPROVAL IS REQUIRED (AND PERMITS NEEDED): N/A Environmental Assessment No.97-25 Page 2 of 20 �.1 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a"Potentially Significant Impact"or is"Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated," as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Land Use&Planning ❑ Transportation/Circulation ❑ Public Services ❑ Population&Housing ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Utilities& Service Systems ❑ Geological Problems ❑ Energy&Mineral ❑ Aesthetics Resources ❑ Water ❑ Hazards ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Air Quality ❑ Noise ❑ Recreation ❑ ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance 1 t DETERMINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, ❑ and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be Q prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ❑ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s)on the environment,but that at least one effect(1)has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and(2)has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a"potentially significant impact"or is"potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL i12ViPACT REPORT is required,but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ Signature Date Catherine O'Hara Planner Printed Name Title Environmental Assessment No.97-25 Page 3 of 20 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: . 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except"No Impact"answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A"No Impact"answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to the project. A"No Impact"answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards. 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved. Answers should address off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct,and construction as well as operational impacts. 3. "Potentially Significant Impact"is appropriate, if an effect is significant or potentially significant,or if the lead agency lacks information to make a finding of insignificance. If there are one or more"Potentially Significant Impact"entries when the determination is made,preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is warranted. 4. Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigated"applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from"Potentially Significant Impact"to a"Less than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures,and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level(mitigation measures from Section XVII,"Earlier Analyses,"may be cross,-referenced). 5. Earlier analyses may be used where,pursuant to the tiering,program EIR,or other CEQA process,an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analyses are discussed in Section XVII at the end of the checklist. 6. References to information sources for potential impacts(e.g.,general plans,zoning ordinances)have been incorporated into the checklist. A source list has been provided in Section XVII. Other sources used or individuals contacted have been cited in the respective discussions. he following checklist has been formatted after Appendix I of Chapter 3,Title 14,California Code of Regulations, but has been augmented to reflect the City of Huntington Beach's requirements. Note: Standard Conditions of Approval-The City imposes standard conditions of approval on projects which are :onsidered to be components of or modifications to the project,some of these standard conditions also result in reducing :)r minimizing environmental impacts to a level of insignificance. However,because they are considered part of the ?roject,they have not been identified as mitigation measures. For the readers' information,a list of applicable standard :onditions identified in the discussions has been provided as Attachment No.3. SAMPLE QUESTION.• Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than SSUES(and Supporting Information Sources): Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact Yould the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts 7volving: .andslides or Mudflows? (Sources: 1, 6) O O L7 Nscussion: The attached source list explains that I is the Huntington leach General Plan and 6 is'a topographical map of the area which how that the area is located in a flat area (Note:.This response robably would not require further explanation). :nvironmental Assessment No.97-25 Page 4 of 20 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the Proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑x (Sources: 3, 4, 16) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or ❑ ❑ ❑ p policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? (Sources: 3, 16) c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the ❑ ❑ ❑ p vicinity?(Sources: 1) d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g., ❑ ❑ ❑ p impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible uses)?(Sources: 3) e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an ❑ ❑ ❑ p established community(including a low-income or minority community)? (Sources: 1, 2, 3) Discussion: The Edwards project site is located on Edwards Street'between Ellis Avenue and Inlet Drive. The site is currently public right of way (ROW). The center portion of the ROW is improved as a two lane road. The east and west sides of the ROW are graded but undeveloped. With this proposal,the full width of the ROW will be developed to construct a four lane,primary arterial roadway(two north bound and two south bound lanes)in conformance with mitigation measures identified in the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan EIR 89-1. Between Ellis and Talbert Avenues, along the west side of the ROW, the land area is vacant but is slated for development as the Harriett M. Weider Regional Park. Single family homes exist along the west side of Edwards,north of Talbert and south of Inlet. Along the east side of the ROW is Central Park, including Dog Park and vacant land for future Central Park extension. The Talbert project site is located on Talbert Avenue,between Edwards Street and Fieldbury Lane. The site is currently ROW. The southern side of Talbert Avenue will be reduced with roadway width transitioning from 80 to 40 feet at Edwards. This project will allow for a safer traffic condition at the intersection of Edwards given the latter street's slope condition and proposed raised median. Land along the south side of the ROW is vacant and is unincorporated. The proposed project is consistent with, and is designed to implement,the City's adopted Land Use Plan, Circulation Element, environmental policies and land use ordinances for the area, including the General Plan,the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan, EIR 89-1, and adopted regional circulation and park plans. The project is compatible with existing and proposed land uses. No agricultural resources or operations exist in the project area and no established community will be divided, impacted or physically rearranged. No significant, adverse land use impacts are anticipated to be generated by the proposed project. Environmental Assessment No.97-25 �l Page 5 of 20 l D - Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant UES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local ❑ ❑ ❑ p population projections? (Sources: 3, 5) b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly ❑ O ❑ D or indirectly (e.g.,through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? (Sources: 3, 5) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable ❑ ❑ ❑ O housing? (Sources: 1,2,6) Discussion% The proposed street widening project and Talbert improvements will not in and of themselves affect the location, density, distribution or growth rate of population in the area,nor will they increase the demand for housing. The project will be located along existing right of way and will not lisplace any existing housing units, affordable or otherwise. The proposed Edwards Street project is a part of the City's overall circulation plan and is intended to help provide adequate circulation for existing and planned land uses pursuant to the City's adopted Land Use Plan, Circulation Element and Holly Seacliff Specific Plan. Additionally,the proposed Edwards Street project is identified as a mitigation'measure in EIR 89-1 to offset the traffic impacts projected to be generated by the buildout of the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan. No significant adverse population and/or housing impacts are anticipated to be generated by the proposed project. III.GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? (Sources: 3,4,7,8) ❑ ❑ ❑ p b) Seismic ground shaking?(Sources: 3,7,8) ❑ ❑ ❑ p c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ❑ ❑ . ❑ 10. (Sources: 3,7,8) d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? (Sources: 3,7, ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑x 8) Landslides or Mudflows? (Sources: 3,7,9) ❑ ❑ ❑ p Environmental Assessment No.97-25 ,. -Page 6 of 20 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact r f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ conditions from excavation,grading,or fill? i (Sources: 3,7) g) Subsidence of the land? (Sources: 8) ❑ ❑ p ❑ h) Expansive soils? (Sources: 3,7, 8) ❑ ❑ p ❑ i) Unique geologic or physical features? ❑ ❑ ❑ IN (Sources:3,7,8 ) Discussion: The entire project site is proposed to be graded. Grading will involve approximately 24,460 cubic yards of cut with a maximum depth cut of 11.0 feet,and 9,365 cubic yards of fill with a maximum slope height of 11.5 feet. Approximately 15,100 cubic yards will be exported from the site. The proposed design will moderately change the street profile of Edwards Street from its current grade of approximately 12 percent to a maximum grade of 8.8 percent. Vertical curves of 1,300 feet and 300 feet are included to facilitate a grade transition and sight distance. The ultimate street cross section includes the eighty(80) feet of right of way and a two(2)foot wide transition area outside the right of way on each side of the street. The final grade of the transition area will not exceed a 2:1 slope ratio . consistent with the specifications of the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan and EIR 89-1 and Addendum. Grading will be subject to standard conditions of approval ensuring that soils conditions are suitable for the proposed street improvements. The project site is not located in an area identified as having liquefaction, Iandslide or mudslide risks, or risk of seiche,tsunami,or volcanic hazards. Construction of the project will result in short term wind and water erosion impacts. These impacts will be minimized through implementation of standard conditions of approval requiring the use of dust control measures and the implementation of a City approved desilting plan. (See conditions No. 1,2 and 3 in Attachment 3.) The project will result in minor topographical changes. However,the existing topography in the area of improvements is not considered to be geologically unique. The project site is located within the seismically active southern California area. Seismic hazards constitute an existing safety condition experienced by all development in the southern California region. Site specific seismic hazards generally stem from the potential for fault rupture or ground failure. However,the project site is located approximately two miles from the Newport Inglewood fault and is not located within the Alquist-Priolo Special Hazards Zone. The project site is located in the vicinity of a branch of the Bolsa-Fairview Fault which is considered to be inactive or non-existent. With the standard conditions of approval as identified in Attachment 3 of this environmental assessment,the proposed project is not anticipated to impose any significant,adverse geologic impacts. Environmental Assessment No.97-25 (� Page 7 of 20 ' Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant "'SL1ES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact IV.WATER Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or ❑ ❑ 17 ❑ the rate and amount of surface runoff? (Sources: 2) b) Exposure of people or property to water related ❑ ❑ p ❑ hazards such as flooding? (Sources: 9) c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑p surface water quality(e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? (Sources: 1) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any ❑ ❑ ❑ p water body? (Sources: 1) e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of ❑ ❑ ❑ p water movement? (Sources: 1) f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either ❑ ❑ ❑ p through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? (Sources: 3) g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ❑ ❑ p ❑x (Sources:3,7,8) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? (Sources: 3,7,8) ❑ ❑ ❑ p i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater ❑ ❑ ❑ p otherwise available for public water supplies? (Sources: 3,5,7) Discussion: The proposed street improvements will be constructed in an area partially covered by impervious surfaces. Storm run off from the site currently drains toward the east and west of Edwards street into vacant land. The proposed improvements will alter the topography of the site and will introduce additional impervious surfaces, thereby increasing runoff. After construction,runoff will continue to drain east and west off the site through controlled catch basin outlets onto vacant land and natural drainage courses. Drainage systems in the area have been designed to account for the proposed widening and can adequately accommodate the increased runoff. Drainage patterns on adjacent sites will not be altered or impacted. Environmental Assessment No.97-25 Page 8 of 20 Z,7 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact The proposed project does not include any activity which will impact groundwater. The subject improvements are not located in the vicinity of any marine or freshwaters. The majority of the project area is located in zone X which is outside the flood hazard area. The northeast portion of the Edwards Street right-of-way between Talbert and Inlet is located in flooplane zone A99. The project does not involve any activities which will impact the quality,quantity or flows of surface waters or flood waters. The project has been designed to protect the City's main water trunk line which is located under the centerline of Edwards Street,both during construction and after completion. The project will include irrigation for the center median landscaping and the transition areas. Low water using plants will be utilized and irrigation will be supplied by extending the lines that currently exist at the adjacent Central Park. With conditions of approval No. 1, 2 and 3 listed in Attachment 3 of this document, impacts related to flooding and changes in absorption rates,drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff will be reduced to a level of less than significant. V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an ❑ ❑ ❑ p existing or projected air quality violation? (Sources: 10) b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? (Sources:. ❑ ❑ p ❑ 1) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature? ❑ ❑ ❑ p (Sources: 6) d) Create objectionable odors? (Sources: 6) ❑ ❑ ❑ p Discussion: Construction equipment emissions and fugitive dust generation associated with earth moving activities may impose short-term deterioration of local ambient air quality. No long term impacts are anticipated. Conditions of approval No. 3e and 12 (See Attachment No. 3), and Mitigation Measures No. 1 and 2 identified in Attachment 4 will serve to reduce the potential air quality impacts to a level less than significant. Environmental Assessment No.97-25 g Page 9 of 20 D' Z Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant SUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact VI.TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ (Sources: 6, 11) b) Hazards to safety from design features(e.g.,sharp ❑ ❑ ❑ p curves or dangerous intersections)or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (Sources: 2) c) Inadequate emergency access or inadequate access ❑ ❑ ❑x ❑ to nearby uses? (Sources: 1, 2) d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? (Sources: 2,4) ❑ ❑ ❑ p e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ❑ ❑ p ❑ (Sources: 2) f) * Conflicts with adopted policies supporting ❑ ❑ ❑ p alternative transportation(e.g.,bus turnouts,bicycle racks)? (Sources: 2) g) Rail,waterborne or air traffic impacts? (Sources: 1) ❑ ❑ ❑ p Discussion: Construction of the proposed project is expected to last approximately 120 working days, with road closure of approximately 90 days. The Department of Public Works has indicated that during the construction phase there will be a slight increase in trips per day due to construction activities, as well as, construction related lane closures. Temporary lane closures during construction may result in short-term interruptions to traffic circulation, including pedestrian and bicycle flow. As required by conditions of approval No. 3c, 8,9 and 11 listed in Attachment 3 and Mitigation Measures No. 3 and 4 .listed in Attachment 4 of this document, a"construction vehicle control plan"will be devised prior to commencement of construction and will be implemented during construction to minimize construction traffic impacts and ensure ongoing safety throughout construction. The vehicle control plan will include provisions such as the requirement to post construction signs to identify the routes for trucks and equipment, street closure plans, and advance coordination with Police and Fire to ensure adequate emergency vehicle access. The street widening project in and of itself will not generate traffic. The improvements are proposed to accommodate projected traffic flow anticipated by buildout of the approved Land Use Plan in the area. fhe improvements will provide greater circulation capacity and will bring the street grade and line of Environmental Assessment No.97-25 Page 10 of 20 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact sight distance into conformance with current traffic engineering standards. A traffic signal will be installed at the intersection of Edwards and Ellis. A second traffic signal may be installed at the intersection of Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue to accommodate left turn movements from eastbound Talbert Avenue to northbound Edwards Street and to allow pedestrian crossings at the Edwards/Talbert intersection. If the second traffic signal is not included in the project,the Talbert improvements may result in the diversion of trips to Varsity and Inlet Drives as left turns out of Talbert Avenue may be prohibited because of limited line of sight opportunities at Talbert Avenue. No activities are proposed which might impact waterborne, air,or rail traffic. With the implementation of conditions of approval and mitigation measures noted in this discussion,no significant, adverse circulation impacts are anticipated. i VII.BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: s a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their ❑ ❑ ❑ p habitats (including but not limited to: plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? (Sources: 6) b) Locally designated species (e.g.,heritage trees)? ❑ ❑ ❑ 19 (Sources: 6) c) .Locally designated natural communities(e.g., oak ❑ ❑ ❑ p forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? (Sources: 6, 13) d) Wetland habitat(e.g.,marsh,riparian and vernal ❑ ❑ ❑ p pool)? (Sources: 6, 13) e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? p ❑ ❑ p (Sources: 7) Discussion: The subject street segment is not located in the vicinity of any sensitive plant or animal resources and does not include any area used for cultivation of an agricultural crop, The project site is contained within the existing improved right-of-way adjacent to Central Park and the future Harriett M. Weider Regional Park. A 36 inch drainage culvert/wildlife corridor crossing will be installed under Edwards Street to maintain a connection between the two parks (Attachment No. 5). Minor portions of the park sites may be impacted temporarily from construction activities. However,no trees,habitat or significant biological resources will be significantly impacted, either in the short tern or long term. The proposed project is located in a predominately developed area and will not result in a change in the' diversity of, or provide a barrier to, any plant or animal species. No impacts to wetland habitat or wildlife are anticipated. Therefore, no significant, adverse biological resources impacts are anticipated. Environmental Assessment No.97-25 30 Page 11 of 20 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ~ 'UES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact VIII.ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the�proposal a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 (Source: 3) b) Use non-renewable resource in a wasteful and inefficient manner? (Sources: 3, 7) ❑ ❑ ❑ 19 c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 and the residents of the State? (Sources: 1,3,6) Discussion: The project is not located in an area with known mineral resources with regional value and will not cause any increases in the rate of use of non-renewable energy/fuel resources. The project is not in conflict with any adopted energy conservation plans. Therefore,no significant, adverse impacts to natural resources are anticipated. IX. I[AZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a). A risk of accidental explosion or release of ❑ ❑ ❑ O hazardous substances (including,but not limited to: oil,pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? (Sources:3,6,7) b) Possible interference with an emergency response ❑ ❑ ❑ O plan or emergency evacuation plan? (Sources: 3,7) c) The creation of any health hazard or potential ❑ ❑ ❑ o hazards? (Sources: 2,6) d) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 brush, grass, or trees? (Sources: 2,6) Discussion: The proposed street widening will not involve the use of any hazardous materials. The project will result in temporary lane closures along the subject street segments during construction. These temporary closures could impede emergency fire and police response. The conditions of approval No. 3c and d, 8, 9 and 11 listed in Attachment 3 and Mitigation Measures No. 3 and 4 listed in Attachment 4 of this document require adequate emergency response during and after construction, as well as coordination between the Public Works Department, contractor, Police and Fire departments. With the imposition of the 'ditions of approval and mitigation measures identified in this discussion, no significant health hazards ,._.potential hazards related to hazardous materials are anticipated. Environmental Assessment No.97-25 . Page 12 of 20 31 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? (Sources: 3,7,12) ❑ ❑ ❑x ❑ b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ❑ ❑ p ❑ (Sources: 3,7,12) Discussion: Construction Noise: Residential uses near the project may experience short term audible noise level increases during construction of the roadway widening. The construction activities will be required to comply with Chapter 8.40 Noise of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code, and with the standard conditions of approval Nos. 3b and 14 listed in Attachment 3 of this report. The hours of construction will be limited. With the implementation of the conditions of approval and adherence to the Municipal Code noise standards,no significant, adverse noise impacts are anticipated during construction of the proposed project. Long-term Noise: Long term noise levels along the widened Talbert Avenue and Edwards Street corridor are projected to be within the acceptable levels established in the City's Municipal Code and Noise Element. Therefore, no short term or long term, adverse noise impacts are anticipated to be generated by the proposed project. M.PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? (Sources: Huntington Beach Fire ❑ ❑ ❑ p Dept.) b) Police Protection? (Sources: Huntington Beach ❑ ❑ ❑ p Police Dept.) c) Schools? (Sources: 13) ❑ ❑ ❑ p d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? (Sources: City of Huntington Beach) ❑ ❑ O ❑ e) Other governmental services? (Sources: City of Huntington Beach) ❑ ❑ ❑ p Discussion: The project will not require any additional Police or Fire.personnel or facilities to serve the site. In addition, it will not impact any school or recreational facilities or require any increases in government services. The proposed improvements will be constructed and maintained by the City. However, the project will not require any substantial increase in personnel or maintenance operations. Therefore, no significant adverse impacts to public services are anticipated. Environmental Assessment No.97-25 32-- Page 13 of 20 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant SUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact XII.UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? (Sources: 5, 7) ❑ ❑ ❑ p b) Communication systems? (Source: 5,7) _ ❑ ❑ ❑ O c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 facilities: (Sources 5,7) d) Sewer or septic tanks? (Sources: 5,7) ❑ ❑ ❑ O e) Storm water drainage? (Sources: 5, 7) ❑ ❑ ❑ i] f) Solid waste disposal? (Sources: 5, 7) ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 g) Local or regional water supplies? (Sources: 5, 7) ❑ ❑ ❑ 10 Discussion: The proposed project has been designed so as not to impact the existing water line which runs beneath the centerline along Edwards Street. Storm water catch basins will be included and anticipated runoff will be accommodated by the existing storm drain system. Existing 66 kv electrical lines will be relocated further west of Edwards Street and will remain above ground due to their high voltage. Existing 12kv electrical lines will be placed undergound in Edwards Street. An existing under ground Southern California Edison fuel line that extends along the west side of Edwards Street will be relocated along Edwards Street in order to maintain adequate cover. Street lights will be installed at appropriate distances along Edwards Street. Solid waste disposal, local and regional water supplies, natural gas and communication systems will not be impacted by the proposed project. Therefore,the project poses no significant,adverse impacts to utilities and service systems. XIMAESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? (Sources: ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ 1) b) 'Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? ❑ ' ❑ ❑ 9 (Sources: 1,4) c) Create light or glare? (Sources: 2) ❑ ❑ ❑ p Environmental Assessment No.97-25 Page 14 of 20 Z 3 3 D- . Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact Discussion: The proposed construction will occur adjacent to parkland and single family residences to the south and north of the site. The proposed improvements will not obstruct any significant view iopportunities or create a permanently visually offensive site. However,temporary visual impacts from construction activity such as grading and open trenches will occur. In the vicinity of the proposed project, Edwards Street is designated as a Secondary Path/Image Corridor and a Landscape Corridor. The project area.will be landscaped in accordance with the comprehensive landscape plan adopted for the Holly Seacliff area in the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan. The standard conditions of approval listed in Attachment 3 of this document(Nos. 4,5 and 13)require that the site be maintained free from debris. In addition, landscaping will be provided in the raised median, slopes and transition areas for aesthetic enhancement. Therefore, no significant, adverse aesthetic impacts are anticipated. XIV.CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? (Sources: ❑ ❑ ❑ p 14,17) b) Disturb archaeological resources? (Sources: 14,17) ❑ ❑ p ❑ c) Affect historical resources? (Sources: 15) ❑ ❑ ❑ N d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which ❑ ❑ ❑ p would affect unique ethnic cultural values? (Sources: 1,2,3) e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the ❑ ❑ ❑ p potential impact area? (Sources: 1,3) Discussion: Paleontological resources: The project site is not identified as being paleontologically significant. During previous studies and excavations conducted at the site, no significant paleontological resources were identified. The Mitigation and Monitoring Plan adopted with EIR 89-1 outlines five measures (EIR 89-1 Mitigation and Monitoring Plan,Page 63, Paleontology. 6-10)to mitigate potential impacts on paleontological resources in the area. (See Attachment 3, condition of approval No. 15 and 16, and Mitigation Measure No. 5,Attachment 4.) The proposed Edwards widening will comply with these mitigation measures as appropriate. ,Archeological Resources: Per the mitigation measures adopted with EIR 89-1, an archeological assessment of the site and surrounding areas was prepared by Scientific Resources Surveys, Inc. in 1991 and a written report was prepared(SRS Project No. 977, dated 2/19/92). Excavation and study of the site resulted in significant findings of artifacts, shellfish remains and human burial sites. The artifacts and shellfish deposits were analyzed, recorded and transferred for further study and storage as Environmental Assessment No.97-25 3 q Page 15 of 20 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant JES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact appropriate. The burial remains were re-buried in accordance with the"Reburial Agreement"between the archeologist, SRS, Inc. and Native American Consulting Services, dated 1/29/91 and attached to SRS No. 977. SRS No. 977 concluded that the twelve month work effort resulted in complete mitigation of the resources within the road widening corridor and that"no further mitigation for archaeology is necessary"for the area. The Assessment was reviewed by a neutral third party,Dr. Wallace, Professor Emertius of Anthropology of the California State University, Long Beach. Dr. Wallace concluded that the SRS No. 977 study is a complete field record of the project area and that the project area,"Edwards Hill",may be developed without concern for loss of signinficant cultural resources. The professor did recommend,however,that in light of the fact that significant resources have been found on the site, including human burial sites, an archeologist should be on site during future project construction. Condition of approval Nos. 15 and 16 of Attachment 3, and Mitigation Measure No. 5 of Attachment 4 require that this recommendation be carried out. If artifacts or burial sites are uncovered during grading,construction activities will be required to be halted until proper analysis and recordation can be undertaken and/or reburial procedures in accordance with the agreement contained in SRS No. 977 have been accomplished. Historical Resources: The project site is not located in an area identified as having historic significance. le proposed project does not have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect ethnic cultural values,nor will it restrict religious or sacred uses.. Therefore,with the implementation of the conditions of approval and mitigation measures discussed in this section,no significant, adverse cultural resources impacts are anticipated. XV.RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional ❑ ❑ ❑ 19 parks or other recreational facilities? (Sources: 1, 2) b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ❑ ❑ ❑ (Sources: 1) Discussion: The project will not result in the loss of existing community-wide recreational facilities. A portion of the street widening will occur adjacent to Central Park and the future Harriett M. Wieder Regional Park. This area will be temporarily blocked from public access during construction. The necessary right of way area/easements for construction.areas have been obtained and no additional right of way or easements are anticipated to be necessary. The open space/greenbelt areas adjacent to Central Park and the future Harriet M. Weider Regional Park will be returned to their original condition after the construction is completed. No significant, adverse impacts to recreational facilities r amenities are anticipated. Environmental Assessment No.97-25 35 Page 16 of 20 D-2 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the ❑ ❑ ❑ p quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? (Sources: 2, 7) Discussion: The project is not located in the areas of any wildlife or biological resource areas and will not substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, or reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal. No significant, adverse impacts are anticipated from the proposed project. b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short- ❑ ❑ . ❑ p term,to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals? (Sources: 3) Discussion: The proposed project is consistent with the City of Huntington Beach General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Holly Seacliff Specific Plan and EIR 89-1. The project will implement required mitigation measures for the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan and EIR 89-1, as well as the Holly Seacliff Development.Agreement. The proposed project will enhance traffic flow, improve the current status of the Edwards Street grade and improve line of sight visibility. The project will not achieve short term goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited,but cumulatively considerable? ❑ ❑ ❑ p ("Cumulatively considerable"means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) (Sources: 3,5,6,7,8) Discussion: See discussion of items no. I-XV above. Environmental Assessment No.97-25 v z 3(a Page 17 of 20 - Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant TES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human 0 O 9 13 beings, either directly or indirectly? (Sources: 2, 6) Discussion: See discussion of items no. I-XV above. I Environmental Assessment No.97-25 Page 18 of 20 D_ . 31 XVII. EARLIER ANALYSIS Earlier analyses may be used where,pursuant to tiering,program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063 (c)(3)(D). Earlier Documents Prepared and Utilized in this Analysis Reference# Document Title Available for Review at: 1 Project Vicinity Map See Attachment#1 2 Site Plan See Attachment#2 City of Huntington Beach 3 City of Huntington Beach General Plan Community Development Dept., Planning/Zoning Information Counter, 3`d Floor 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach 4 City of Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision .Ordinance " 5 City of Huntington Beach Environmental Impact Report " for General Plan Update 6 Project Narrative " 7 City of Huntington Beach General Plan Technical " Background Report for General Plan Update 8 Geotechnical Inputs " for City of Huntington Beach 9 FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (November 3, 1993) " 10 Air Quality Handbook, South Coast Air Quality " Management District 11 Trip Generation, 4th Edition " Institute of Transportation Engineers City of Huntington Beach City 12 City of Huntington Beach Municipal Code Clerk Office,2nd Floor 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach 13 City of Huntington Beach City of Huntington Beach CEQA Procedures Handbook Community Development Dept., :Environmental Assessment No. 97-25 "D' Page 19 of 20 r Planning/Zoning Information Counter, 3`d Floor 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach 14 City of Huntington Beach Archaeological Site Vicinity " Map 15 City of Huntington Beach Historic District Location " Map 16 Holly Seacliff Specific Plan/EIR 89-1 " 17. Scientific Resources Study No. 977 " 18 Third party review of Scientific Resources Study No. " 977. Letter dated June 29, 1992 from William J. Wallace, Ph.D.to Mr. Robert Hammond, City of Huntington Beach Environmental Assessment No.97-25 Page 20 of 20 _ �139 ATTACHMENT I VICINITY MAP Environmental Assessment No.97-25 40 anvil 1111111111112 RUN Mc MM III%ll/I -so �1j .♦� �• ��_!� ��1/I�Ii�% ��0�1�%��►ice �� - ,Ii W Illlr II�IIIII III - 1♦� �� ■, �.,� !OM, z��I _ �� IIIIIIIIIIIII HIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII II u F �,.Illlllllllll,llllllllllll Illlllllllil�lllllllillil ■,Illillllllll=ll— fll�IIIIII - - � � �illilillllll�� ,:IIIIIIIIIIII - � -� IIillllllllll p� _ IIiiliunu �;,,�� IIIIIIIIIIIII ``, �� IIIIIIIIIIIII ■�i�►��aa!IIIIIIIIillll — IIIIIIIIIIIII l� IIIIIIIIIIIII � 1 w o ATTACHMENT 2 SITE PLAN ON FILE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK Environmental Assessment No.97-25 ITS -OF ' UNTINGT N BEAGII PUELIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SUREET IMPROVEMENT PLANk, . ..FOR EDWARDS _ STREET ' BETWEEN ELLIS AVENUE AND INLET DRIVE • W at7001 K NMIQ� ,,d••mt � aK DS } • 6 1� A Y `•� PROJECT ' •ts ' � TparlPr aK . 0'r , '►ti' VICINITY MAP '-sm ILLi CornP�re, $e-r- dF MAPS (o PA6es • Avw.la,61e. in --he Gib Clerk 's 4r Public Revi e w BASS OF BF-ARMCS +c R..a o¢oa.s eam ua K tarteut s Do or s+m soe roar vmnir us s ero�a r.aa w n o—�M raoo ■mmFCC as,nw•� i AMarC Oes • Dorm v w¢sm s pupom PERCHEARK O.C.SAW. 1H-133-70• ' ■K fsrtm o.ai s K rmsaa s tamer o.m r0 oua dtl � . w.ss�nasKtmoarctrKs+sarratta►tsK . . • tsetO ut tr K eoaG u tt•t�r tr•nc rra.�w�u rso Der tr ' . to.ta tat ara•eat m K s a a ttst os tva•to+r root. _ ' top w K O @ r0 u tart war w.o K oo+o . [*iJ14 A Al DEN & w....r rr�t n+s�ar - cbwm.sun � VSSOCUTIS tr r•t�.�w M r+a� wr ' ' •1 ISO.rrw w.r.w REFERENCES •—wm sr ►w m=soot es vow-so,to y •true n•mC r e.w L.atCOM rt a L rt rpt t o•�e �/»M eert-w-w.. •nnowvea rr on 0-c acmV C GOtaa•R ti t aff CFvYf"Mor RC CcKckzv on f • .1 A . i ATTACHMENT 3 r-� CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 4 q Environmental Assessment No.97-25 'D� 2 Environmental Assessment No. 97-25 - Conditions of Approval 1. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code, Zoning Ordinance, Building and Fire Codes, as well as, applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards. 2. A Grading Plan,prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted for review and approval prior to issuance of a grading permit. 3. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the Public Works Department shall: a. Prepare a drainage and erosion control plan for construction of the project. The plan shall include measures such as the following: • Diversion of off-site runoff away from the construction site; • Prompt revegetation of proposed landscape areas; • Perimeter sandbagging or temporary basins to trap sediment; and • Regular sprinkling of exposed soils during construction phases to minimize fugitive dust. b. Ensure that all grading and construction vehicles and equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped and maintained with effective muffler systems that use state of the art noise attenuation and that stockpiling and/or vehicle staging areas shall be located as far as practicable from sensitive noise receptors. c. Be responsible for the incorporation of measures to reduce construction related traffic congestion. Measures shall include: • Provision of rideshare incentives. • Provision of transit incentives for construction personnel. • Configuration of construction parking to minimize traffic interference. • Measures to minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes. • Use of a flagman to guide traffic when deemed necessary. d. Develop a truck and construction vehicle routing plan. This plan shall specify the hours in which transport activities can occur and methods to minimize construction related impacts to adjacent residents. e. Be responsible for assuring that construction vehicles are equipped with proper emission control equipment to substantially reduce emissions. 4.`. Landscaping shall be provided in accordance with the adopted Holly Seacliff Specific Plan for Edwards Street and in accordance with the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance for Talbert Avenue. 5. Landscape architectural plans shall be submitted to the Public Works Division Landscape Architect and approved prior to construction of project. Installation shall be in accordance with the Arboricultural and Environmental Assessment No. 97-25 Attachment No.3 -Conditions of Approval Landscape Standards and Specifications,the"Greenbook"for Public Works construction projects and the inspector's discretion. A separate water meter and backflow prevention device shall be provided for the irrigation system. 7. Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be completed prior to final inspectiontwithin 12 months. 8. The Public Works Department shall ensure the standards regarding pedestrian(including ADA) and bicycle safety along the perimeter sidewalks have been met. 9. The applicant shall notify the City of Huntington Beach Fire and Police Departments of the duration and the extent of any street lane closures a minimum of 24-hours prior to the initiation of grading activities so that they can identify alternative emergency routes for the duration of the street closures, if necessary 10. Prior to initiation of grading,the applicant shall contact all utility providers and identify the location of existing utility lines within the subject public rights-of way. The applicant shall notify the companies of trenching activities so that impacts to existing line and disruptions to existing service can be avoided. 11. A minimum of 10 days prior to start of construction activity,the Public Works Department shall: a. Post construction signs indicating the nature of construction, its expected duration and provide a contact name and phone number for the project. b. Submit to the Fire and Police Departments a traffic circulation plan identifying the routes which equipment and trucks will use to access and depart from the area. The plan shall use routes which will generate the minimum number of circulation conflicts with residential,pedestrian,bicycle and vehicle traffic. 12.During grading and construction,the Public Works Department shall: a. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems in all areas where vehicles travel to keep damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site; b. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day; c. Use low sulfur fuel(0.5%)by weight for construction equipment; d. Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days first stage smog alerts); e. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts. f. Be responsible for assuring that vehicle movement on any unpaved surface other than water trucks shall be terminated if wind speeds exceed 15 miles per hour. Environmental Assessment No.97-25 Attachment No.3 -Conditions of Approval 46 T -2 V 13. All building spoils such as unusable lumber, wire,pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. 14.All operations shall comply with the City of Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance. Construction shall be limited to Monday-Saturday 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal Holidays. 15. A certified archeologist shall monitor the site during grading. In the event that significant cultural, paleontologic or archeological sites are unearthed, grading shall cease until proper documenting in accordance with EIR 89-1 and SRS 977 has been accomplished and, if necessary,proper re-burial in accordance with SRS 977 has been undertaken. 16. Mitigation measures 5 -10,Page 63, from EIR 89-1 regarding Paleontological Resources shall be adhered to _ as appropriate.. Environmental Assessment No.97-25 Attachment No.3 -Conditions of Approval -D ATTACHMENT 4 MITIGATION MEASURES Environmental Assessment No.97-25 Proposed Mitigation Measures -Environmental Assessment No. 97-25 Air Quality Impacts: The proposed project will generate short term air quality and exhaust odor impacts during construction of the new storm drain system 1. Mitigation: The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code, Building and Fire codes, as well as,applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances and standards 2.. Mitigation: Use water trucks'or sprinkler systems in all areas where vehicles travel to keep damp enough to ! prevent dust raised when leaving the site: I • Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day; • Use low sulfur fuel(.05%)by weight for construction equipment; • Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days (first stage smog alerts); • Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts, and • Maintain equipment engines in proper tune. Circulation Impact: The project may result in temporary lane closures along the subject street segment. These temporary street closures may impede emergency fire and police response during these periods. 3. Mitigation: The Public Works Department or designee shall notify the Fire and Police Departments of the duration and the extent of any street lane closures related to construction of the proposed project a minimum of 24-hours prior to the initiation of such activities in order to identify alternative emergency routes for the duration of the street closures, if necessary. 4. Mitigation: Alternative 1 -Install traffic signal at intersection of Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue to provide for northbound left turns from Talbert Avenue to Edwards Street. Alternative 2-to prohibit northbound left turns from Talbert Avenue to northbound Edwards Street. Circulation Impact: Construction related closures an.the increase in construction traffic may generate short term circulation impacts and introduce new obstacles to motor,bicycle and pedestrian traffic. 5. Mitigation: A minimum of 10 days prior to the commencement of construction on the project,the Public Works Department shall prepare and implement a circulation plan.identifying the routes by which . construction equipment and trucks should use to access and depart from the area. The plan shall use routes which will generate the minimum number of circulation conflicts with residential, pedestrian, bicycle and vehicle traffic. A minimum of 10 days prior to the commencement of construction on the project, the Public Works Department shall also prepare and post information signs in the vicinity of the project site indicating Environmental Assessment No.97-25 Attachment No.4-Mitigation Measures M - :L • +9 the nature of construction,the anticipated duration and provide a contact name and phone number for the project. .rcheolo icQ a, 1lmpact: The project site has been identified as containing cultural and archeological resources. Scientific Resources Study No. 977 was prepared to analyze and study the cultural and archeological resources on the project site and in the vicinity. The study was evaluated by a third party archeologist who concluded that adequate field work had been completed and that"Edwards Hill Burial ... can now be developed without concern for the loss of significant cultural resources in the specific areas explored by Scientific Resources Surveys. However, monitoring during development of the land is recommended." .6. Mitigation: A certified archeologist shall monitor the site during grading. In the event that significant cultural,paleontologic or archeological sites are unearthed,grading shall cease until proper documenting in accordance with EIR 89-1 and SRS 977 has been accomplished and, if necessary,proper re-burial in accordance with SRS 977 has been undertaken. Environmental Assessment No.97-25 Attachment No.4-Mitigation Measures S� ATTACHMENT 5 PROPOSED WILDLIFE CORRIDOR .�7 Environmental Assessment No.47-25 �� of ird I COX, SIM - �W�♦ =fir_ +,�� • n • k_ j j. Attachment No. 5 53 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS ul 11:30om - 1:30pm _r_ (12:30am - 1:30pm) EDWARDS 33)(261)(27) VARSITY 64 481 43 46 (26 3 .0— (3) 6:00am - 8:00om (29)S 53 25 (14) 4:OOpm - 7:OOpm • (7:00am - 8:00am) (2) -=!>6 (5:15pm - 6:15pm) EDWARDS s `�22 1z s10 •20 EDWARDS (16)(308)(22) b 4 CENTRAL 73 a21)( (9)(272X11) PARK �(,n)( �) 24 474 28 37 Q 25 177 1172 64 59 It18 12 C= (12) 21 (6) (80) 122 29 (13) (35) S 111 24 (6) (17) 17 (3) ->17 19 'Z,33 12 542 14 12 -Z,38 29 982 37 VARSITY b 4 0 CENTRAL VARSITY `� 4 0' CENTRAL (11)(379)(13) PARK (8)(369)(14) PARK • LEGEND XX = TOTAL VOLUME (XX) = PEAK HOUR VOLUME REFER TO "SUMMARY OF COUNTS" TABLE. DATE: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SHEET NO. PREPARED BY. JAA 2-17-98 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS OF LJ�?mjF tow CHECKED BY. TAE 2-17-98 EDWARDS STREET - - A''' "A - -f,,l_T; . MARK- INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS 11:30am — 1:30pm (12:00om — 1:00pm) EDWARDS (12)(205)(33) INLET 4 40 19 b 31 Q (16 1 ---- (1) 6:00am — 8:00am (7) .9t 21 29 g (17) 4:OOpm — 7:OOpm (7:00am — 8:00am) (0) 1 (4:45pm — 5:45pm) EDWARDS " �'20 30 b 40 52 0 EDWARDS (6)(301)(16) (19)(252)(31) (24)(415)(41) INLET.0 0 b 8 480 26 72 Q 46 INLET _j 0 7 1119 111 98 Q, 41 (27),S 39 31 9 (23) (11) 31 _ 52,6- (24) (0)-4>0 (2) -=:>6 3 15 6 469 16 8 24 37 972 81 (5)(343)(13) (14)(394)(28 LEGEND N XX = TOTAL VOLUME (XX) = PEAK HOUR VOLUME V'1 rFER TO "SUMMARY OF COUNTS" TABLE. DATE: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SHEET NO. J� � PREPARED BY: JAA 2-17-98 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS OF CHECKED BY: TAE 2-17-98 EDWARDS STREET 2 } AT INI FT Tj- ' INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS N V1 11:30am — 1:30pm d' (12:15am — 1:15pm) EDWARDS " �3)(�15) TALBERT 58 434 6:00am — 8:00cm 4:00pm — 7:00pm (7:00am — 8:00am) (36) 4 60 (5:OOpm — 6:OOpm) 126 254 256 442 EDWARDS Q EDWARDS (13)(405) � (45) (424) TALBERTJ '� (147)(239) TALBERT 0 0 13 664 129 1092 (28) .1;'37 (40) .15�97 241�1), 18 212 503 246 -Z,679 668 997 (152)(336) (248)(371) LEGEND XX = TOTAL VOLUME (XX) = PEAK HOUR VOLUME L "SUMMARY OF COUNTS` TABLE. GATE: ' CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SHEET N0. PREPARED BY: JAA 2-17-98 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS OF 1 CHECKED BY: TAE 17-98 ED-YARDS J 1 BEET �I 4 fi Attachment No. 6 March 13, 1998 Mr. Robert Eichblatt, City Engineer Public Works Department 2000 Main Street. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Subject: Edwards Street Widening Dear Bob: Attached please find an updated construction schedule for the widening of Edwards Street from Ellis Avenue north to Inlet Drive. As you know, recent meetings with the Public Works Commission have resulted in changes to the design of the street requiring revisions to.the plans originally submitted. These plan revisions have been made and we are prepared to begin i construction upon approval of required permits and signature of plans. The street widening involves the relocation of Southern California Edison's overhead transmission lines and poles along the west side of the street as well as undergrounding of the distribution system located on the existing poles. The new street width and.grades must be esiablished before*the existing distribution system can be placed in underground conduits, and the tie-ins for the distribution system must take place before the transmission lines can be relocated to the new pole locations and old poles removed. Southem California Edison will not allow private subcontractors to work on the transmission system relocation, so their cooperation and availability of their crews is critical to completion of the street,v4dening project. SCE is presently scheduled to work on this project from June 1 to October 30, 1998. We will advise you promptly of any changes to the construction schedule. Very truly yours, Viiamf. olman PIanning& Government Relations cc: Ray Silver,Acting City Administrator Daryl Smith,Acting Public Works Director Dave Webb,Deputy City Engineer Terri Elliott,Associate Traffic Engineer Mary Beth Broeren, Senior Planner Ivan Simovich _ 58 PLC Land Company 23 Corporate Plaza,Suita250 . e " 714:721.9777 Telephone '� _Z• Newport Beach.Caliiomia92660.• 714.-729. 1214 facsimile ID Task Name Start Finish 1197 2197 3197 4197 5197 6197 7197 1 8197 19197 J 10187 111197 112197 1198 V98 3A8 4M8 U98 6/98 7198 Ball 1 9198 110/98 111198 1 Edwards Street IA-Ellis to Inlet Mon 2/7197 Tue 11/24/98 Cr 2 ! Ill 3 Preliminary Street Design Mon 2/3197 Mon 2/24/97 4 Staff Review d Design Approval Mon 2124197 Wed 9/24197 5 Prepare Improvement Plans Thu 9125197 Tue 11/11/97 I T 6 Prepare SCE UG Distribution System Plan Wed 11/12/97 Tue 213198 I 7 Prepare SCE OM Trans.Line Retoc.Plans Tue 1127/98 Mon 3130198 8 City Improvement Plan Check Wed 11/12/97 Tue 3131198 9 Add Talbert Improvements Mon 11/17/97 Thu 1115198 10 Talbert Reimbursement Agreement Mon 11/17/97 Id 11/21/97 11 Public Works Commission Review Wed 1121198 Wed 2/1 W8 7i 2 Coastal Development Permit Wed 11/12/97 Mon 416198 i t I i t 13 1603/404 Permits(it required) Thu 2/19I98 Mon 4Q0/98 I 14 Signed Plans Tue 4/7/98 Tue 4f1198 s t I I + 16 Right of Way Acquisition Mon 2lS197 Mon 2r3/97 i 17 Construction Easements Thu 2119198 Tue 3131/98 18 1 19 Bid/Contras wed 4/8/98 Tue 4/28/98 20 Mobilize/Site Preparation Wed 412SMS Tue S/5/98 21 Construction Wed 5/6/98 Tue I V24/98 I I ( I + I ! I l i 22 SCE Underground Distribution Relocation Mon 6/1/98 Fri 8/28198 23 SCE Overhead Transmission Relocations Mon 8131/98 Fri 1000/98 ro)eet:Edwards Street Widening Task Milestone Roiled Up Task Roiled Up Progress Date:I'd 3113198 Progress Summar y ^ Rolled Up Milestone Q Page 1 Attachment No. 7 2.eo CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION REQUEST FOR ACTION SUBMITTED TO: Chair Smith and Members of the Commissiong SUBMITTED BI`Les M. Jones, II, Director of Public Works PREPARED BY: David Webb, Acting Deputy City Engineer SUBJECT: Completion of Edwards Street Improvements between Ellis Avenue and Inlet Drive and Talbert Avenue between Edwards Street and } Fieldbury Lane DATE: February 18, 1998 Statement of Issue,Funding Source,Recommended Action,Alternative Action(s),Analysis,Environmental Status, y Attachment(s) 1 Statement of Issue: Plans are currently being prepared by a consultant to widen Edwards Street from Ellis Avenue to Inlet Drive, from a two lane roadway to a four lane roadway. Included in the Edwards' plan package will be the interim street improvements plans for Talbert • Avenue from Edwards Street to approximately 500 feet west of Edwards Street. This segment of Edwards Street is classified as a Secondary Arterial requiring two lanes in each direction per the Orange County Master Plan of Arterial Highways (OCMPAH) and the City's General Plan Circulation Element. Funding Source: The roadway widening and construction are being funded via the Traffic Impact Fee program. The PLC Land Company is designing and constructing these improvements in accordance with their obligation under the Holly Seacliff Developer Agreement. Traffic Impact Fees collected from Holly Seacliff Specific Plan development will be used to pay for these street improvements. Recommended Action: Open the public meeting for comments on the project. 'Receive, review, and comment on project. Direct staff to proceed with the project to include the widening of Edwards Street, installation of a traffic signal at Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue and a flashing beacon on Edwards Street north of Ellis Avenue. Alternative Action(s): Provide staff with alternate direction regarding the design of street improvements of Edwards Street from Ellis Avenue to Inlet Drive and Talbert Avenue west of Edwards Street per the included Analysis section. Completion of Edwards Street Improvements February 18, 1998 Page 2 Analysis: As a result of the January 21, 1998, Public Works Commission meeting, staff was directed by the Public Works Commission to look into the following: 1) a possible school bus stop on the park side of Edwards Street, 2) a traffic signal at Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue, including a flashing beacon on Edwards Street north of Ellis Avenue for northbound traffic, and 3) provisions for a Wildlife Corridor. 1) With regard to the Commission's request to look into the siting of a school bus stop on the park side of Edwards, staff called Hope View School, Mesa View School, Ocean View School District, Huntington Beach City School District, and Huntington Beach Union High School District, for the possibility of adding or relocating a school bus stop to the park side (east side) of Edwards Street. All the schools and school districts responded that they had no requests for this bus stop. Also, the schools and districts are trying to relocate bus stops off of arterials and not place new bus stops on arterials because of the "Thomas Edward Lanni Schoolbus Safety Act of 1997." Staff concurs with the schools and school districts direction to locate bus stops off of arterial streets and will encourage the district to make pick-ups and drop-offs in the residential streets to prevent children from crossing Edwards Street. 2) Staff analyzed the intersection of Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue for the installation of a traffic signal and a flashing beacon for northbound traffic. The results indicate a traffic signal at Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue is warranted and is discussed as follows: • "Half-Signal" at Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue. Staff looked into the possibility of installing a "Half-Signal" at the intersection of Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue. This will allow northbound traffic to have a continuous green at the intersection and the southbound traffic will stop at the intersection to allow left turns out of Talbert Avenue, (eastbound), onto northbound Edwards Street. There will be no flashing beacon installed on Edwards Street north of Ellis Avenue nor will a crosswalk be installed across Edwards Street with this traffic signal installation. The east to north left turn movement, would then use an acceleration lane to merge with northbound traffic on Edwards Street. With this installation, the left turns into and out of Inlet Drive would be removed to allow for the acceleration lane. The residents of this neighborhood would be able to utilize the protected left turn green arrow movement at the Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue traffic signal for egress out of the tract. A possible safety concern is the merging of the vehicles to the right with northbound traffic. Engineer's estimated cost for the traffic signal installation is. $125,000. The maintenance cost is estimated to be $500 per year. i 62 � Completion of Edwards Street Improvements February 18, 1998 Page 3 I "Half-Signal" at Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue Pros Cons • Vehicles traveling northbound on Edwards 9 No pedestrian crosswalk across Edwards Street-has continuous green .. Street at Talbert Avenue • Fire Department concurs with this design • No flashing beacon for northbound traffic proposal on Edwards Street • Protected left turn, (green arrow • Removal of the left turn lane into Inlet indication) into Edwards Street, Drive (eastbound to northbound) • Protected left turn, (green arrow • Removal of pedestrian crosswalk on indication) into Talbert Avenue, Edwards Street at Inlet Drive (northbound to westbound) • A possible safety concern is the vehicles f exiting Talbert Avenue using an acceleration lane to merge right into the northbound traffic lanes • Maintenance cost for the traffic signal and flashing beacon is $500 annually • Full Signal at Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue. Staff also looked into the possibility of installing a full traffic signal at the intersection of Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue. This will stop northbound and southbound traffic to allow for eastbound to northbound traffic out of Talbert Avenue. Also, a crosswalk would be installed along with the traffic signal. A flashing beacon for northbound traffic, north of Ellis Avenue to warn motorists of a traffic signal ahead will also be installed with the traffic signal. The crosswalk on Edwards Street at Inlet Drive will be removed with the traffic signal installation. Engineers estimated cost for the traffic signal and flashing beacon is $135,000. The maintenance cost for the traffic signal is approximately $500 per year. Full Signal at Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue Pros Cont- • Protected left turn,. (green arrow • Maintenance cost for the traffic signal and indication) into Edwards Street, flashing beacon is $500 annually (eastbound to northbound) • Protected left turn, (green arrow • Potential for increased rear-end collisions indication) into Talbert Avenue, which is typical at all traffic signal (northbound to westbound) installations • Installation of a crosswalk on Edwards • Removal of the crosswalk on Edwards Street at Talbert Avenue Street at Inlet Drive • Flashing beacon will be installed on Edwards Street north of Ellis Avenue for northbound traffic to warn motorists of the traffic signal 3 ' Completion of Edwards Street Improvements February 18, 1998 Page 4 All-Way Stop. Staff was also requested, (by residents), to analyze the intersection of Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue for All-Way Stop signs. The Stop Sign Warrant Analysis concluded that an All-Way Stop is not warranted. The primary reason why the All-Way Stop sign warrant was not met, is due to the very low number of accidents that have occured at this intersection. ' Only one accident was reported over.-the last 12 month period and was not a type susceptible to correction by the installation of an All-Way Stop. A Stop may be warranted if five or more accidents, of a type susceptible to correction by the installation of an All-Way Stop have occurred in a 12 month time period. 3) Staff reviewed previous records regarding the Wildlife Corridor and could not find any documentation requesting or requiring such a facility. Staff reviewed the feasibility of installing the facility and has concluded that two-12 inch concrete pipes will be installed under Edwards Street approximately 250 feet north of Ellis Avenue. Talbert Avenue is designated as a Secondary Arterial per the General Plan and requires two lanes in each direction. Due to the current low volume on Talbert Avenue, it will be improved on an interim basis to half of its Right-of-Way width to accomodate the Edwards Street, street improvements. Included in the improvements will be curb, gutter, sidewalk and landscaping on the south side of the street. Attachment: RD 198 LMJ/REE/DW/tae #30047 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION REQUEST FOR ACTION SUBMITTED TO: Chair Smith and Members of the Commission SUBMITTED BY: Les M. Jones, II, Director of Public Works PREPARED BY: David Webb, Acting Deputy City Engineer SUBJECT: Completion of Edwards Street Improvements between Ellis Avenue and Inlet Drive and Talbert Avenue between Edwards Street and Fieldbury Lane DATE: January 21, 1998 Statement of Issue,Funding Source,Recommended Action,Alternative Action(s),Analysis,Environmental Status,Attachment(s) Statement of Issue: Plans are currently being prepared by a consultant to widen Edwards Street from Ellis Avenue to Talbert Avenue, from a two lane roadway to a four lane roadway. This segment of Edwards Street is a Primary Street with two lanes in each direction per the Orange County.Master Plan of Arterial Highways (OCMPAH) and the City's General Plan Circulation Element. Funding Source: The roadway widening and construction are being funded via the Traffic Impact Fee program. The PLC Land Company is designing and constructing these improvements in accordance with their obligation under the Holly Seacliff Developer Agreement. Traffic Impact Fees collected from Holly Seacliff Specific Plan development will be used to pay for these street improvements. Recommended Action: Receive, review and comment on plans. Hold a public hearing for public comment. Direct staff and proceed with project incorporating desired changes into the plans. Alternative Action(sl: Provide staff with alternate direction regarding the street improvements of Edwards Street from Ellis Avenue to Talbert Avenue and Talbert Avenue West of Edwards Street. Analysis: On August 20, 1997, the Public Works Commission received and filed a Request for Action, for the "Possible Vacation of Talbert Avenue, Edwards Street to Fieldbury Lane," . prepared by James D. Otterson. In the document, it discussed why Edwards Street needs to be improved to a four lane roadway. Edwards Street is currently a two lane road and is shown on the Orange County Master Plan of Arterial Highways, as well as the City's General Plan to be a primary road with two lanes in each direction. Completion of Edwards Street Improvements January 21, 1998 Page 2 The City in conjunction with PLC Land Company, has hired a consultant engineer to design the Edwards Street, street improvement plans between Ellis Avenue and Inlet Drive. The Holly Seacliff Development Agreement, approved by City Council, requires PLC Land Company to widen Edwards Street to its ultimate configuration. There are two major items that must be considered with the design of Edwards Street: 1) the City's existing 42" water transmission main in the center of the street; and 2) the steep grade of the hill that affects the stopping sight distance for Edwards Street. Given these design constraints, City professional staff is in agreement with the design concept for Edwards Street that is represented in the current plans. The City's 42"water transmission main is the only transmission line that moves water between the northern and southern portions of the City. To maintain the integrity of the pipe, it cannot be disturbed or modified. With this in mind, the roadway grades must be dealt with to the degree that a desired four foot coverage over the pipe be maintained. The design of Edwards Hill consists of installing a two foot high raised median in some areas which will provide adequate coverage over the pipe line, while allowing the street grade to be lowered on either side to meet design speed requirements. The proposed design of Edwards Street calls for the hill to be lowered to a grade'of 8.4%, allowing a design speed of 50 mph. The current grade of the hill is 11.3%. The intersection of Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue will be raised approximately two foot as required by the grade change. However, with the grade reduction, the remaining steepness of the hill, and the need to maintain the water transmission line location, the driver's ability to see oncoming traffic will still be limited. This limitation precludes allowing the left turns from eastbound Talbert Avenue onto northbound Edwards Street. Traffic will still be able to turn left onto northbound Edwards Street from Inlet Drive or Varsity Drive. Attachment: Plans for Edwards Street between Ellis Avenue and Talbert Avenue August 20, 1997, Request for Action, "Possible Vacation of Talbert Avenue, Edwards Street to Fieldbury Lane RD 198 LMJ/REE/DW/tae I I I 1 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT O 20451 Craimer Lane - P.O. Box 71 Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 964-8888 March 18, 1998 R E C E I V E D DEPT,qF pUE9LIC WORKS BOARD OF TRUSTEES 1 Shirley Carey President \A� MAR 2 598 19 Q Robert Mann,Ed.D. 1�\ Clerk 1 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA Brian Garland Mr. Daryl Smith, Acting Director Member Public Works Department Catherine McGough City of Huntington Beach Member 2000 Main Street Brian E.Rechsteiner Member Huntington Beach CA 92648 ADMINISTRATION RE: Proposed Stoplight at Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue Duane Dishno,Ed.D. Superintendent Jerry Buchanan Dear Daryl: Assistant Superintendent Administrative Services I want to bring to your attention the impact that a stoplight at Edwards and Talbert Kathy Kessler will have on the Huntington Beach CitySchool District. The District currentlyruns Assistant Superintendent Personnel Services eight bus trips into the Bolsa Landmark area each day. Four trips in the morning and John Conniff four trips in the afternoon. Director Administrative Services Gary Rutherford,Ed.D. The buses currently exit via Varsity and then go right on Edwards in order to get a Director run at Edwards Hill. If the buses are forced to stop at Talbert prior to heading up the Curriculum and Instruction hill, they will not be able to get out of first gear and will be forced to proceed up the hill at two miles per hour. This low speed will be a severe hindrance to traffic. Please consider the impact on District bus schedules and the impact on traffic prior to the installation of a stoplight at this intersection. Please call me at 964-8888 if you have any questions or would like a demo ride on a bus up the hill. Sincerely, co c o=-<C-) w 7---<nrn Jerry Buchanan m o m m Assistant Superintendent D )�x� Administrative Services S� ? LA.) Cl).n b Cc: Dr. Duane Dishno, Superintendent Mr. John Conniff, Director of Administrative Services Mrs. Dorothy Phillips, Supervisor of Transportation "We Are An Equal Opportunity Employer" April 2, 1998 Dear City Council: 1 am sending you this fax because I will be unable to attend the City Council Meeting on Monday, April 6 and would like to have my opinion be made aware of concerning the proposed traffic signal at Edwards and Talbert. I am very much opposed to this signal as it is,in my opinion, an unnecessary expenditure that will increase the danger at that intersection. Talbert Street is at the bottom of Edwards hill, and anyone driving down Edwards hill will realize that to put a traffic signal at the bottom is a ridiculous proposal. Cars will be racing both up and down the hill to avoid stopping at the signal and this will create a potential for accidents. Additionally, cars trying to make sudden stops going down the hill will be at risk of being rear-ended. There is no signal at the intersection now and traffic moves very smoothly. I understand that the grade on Edwards hill will be lowered slightly,but Edwards will still be a significant hill with the risks inherent that I described above. Why does the traffic control at the intersection have to change? As I understand it,the intersection now has a very low or almost non-existent accident rate. Installing a signal here will only increase risk! Please do not proceed with this proposed traffic signal. Thank you, Mrs. Smith x G T � n wm WpM rn 00 D � c� o ? • i RECEIVED CITY CLERK MARTIN & DENISE MENICHIELLO CITY OF 6591 HORSESHOE LANE HUNTINGTON BEACH.CA HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92648 1998 APR -3 A ia- 0 5 APRIL 2, 1998 DEAR CITY COUNCIL OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, A FEW WEEKS BACK I HEARD ABOUT THE PROSPECT OF A TRAFFIC SIGNAL BEING INSTALLED "SOMEWHERE BY TALBERT AND EDWARDS". 1 ASSUMED THE ONLY POSSIBLE LOCATION WOULD BE TO REPLACE THE STOP SIGN AT VARSITY AND EDWARDS. ALTHOUGH I DIDN'T SEE THE NECESSITY AND WOULD RATHER CONTINUE WITH IT AS A STOP SIGN, THE IDEA WAS CONCEIVABLE. NOW I FIND OUT THE PROPOSED SIGNAL IS FOR THE BOTTOM OF EDWARDS HILL. I AM FLOORED! HOW COULD THIS EVEN BE POSSIBLE? CARS WILL BE LINED UP THE HILL ON A RED LIGHT. THE POSSIBILITY OF CARS ROLLING AND REAR-ENDING OTHER CARS IS TREMENDOUS. HOW ABOUT THE UNKNOWING DRIVER COMING OFF THE HILL ONLY TO HAVE A SHORT DISTANCE TO STOP. IF WARNING SIGNS WITH FLASHING LIGHTS ARE POSTED JUST AFTER THE ELLIS AND EDWARDS STOP, HOW COMMERCIAL AND ECSTATICALLY UNPLEASING IS THAT TO THIS RURAL AREA. 1 ALSO SEE PROBLEMS WITH THE CARS HEADING UP EDWARDS HILL. SMALLER ENGINED CARS NEED THAT SHORT "RUNNING START" FROM VARSITY TO GAIN THE MOMENTUM NEEDED TO GET UP THE HILL. GOING FROM A DEAD STOP AT THE BOTTOM OF THE HILL WILL PRESENT PROBLEMS. OUR LITTLE RURAL CORNER OF HUNTINGTON BEACH IS BEING CHIPPED AWAY AT. I REALIZE THAT WITH MORE HOMES WE HAVE TO EXPECT SOME DEPLETION OF THE NATURAL SURROUNDINGS WE HAVE ENJOYED. BUT ADDING MORE LIGHTS AND SIGNALS WILL NOT ONLY BE HAZARDOUS, BUT WILL ADD TO THE "CONCRETE JUNGLE" WE MOVED UP HERE TO GET AWAY FROM. S CERELY, MARTIN A ENISE ZNICHIELLO U Apr' 03 98 04: 32p •Gordon Watson '*714-847-5562 p. 2 RECEIVED CI CITY OFK HUNTINGTON BEACH.CA 1g98 APR -3 P 4= 30 April 3, 1998 Connie Brockway City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street,2"d Floor Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Refer: City Council Meeting Agenda,April 6, 1998 Dear Huntington Beach City Council: The purpose of this letter is to make known to the City Council the position of the Country View Estates Homeowner's Association(CVEHOA)with respect to the proposed traffic light at the intersection of Edward Street and Talbert Avenue(i.e.at the bottom of "Edwards Hill"). The CVEHOA Board of Directors have met and considered this matter in some detail. As a group of homeowners that use this roadway extensively,we are unanimous in our,00Rnosition to the recommendation by the Public Works Commission that a full traffic signal at this location will materially improve the road safety in this area of our city. We support the 'Turning Movement Study"by the Public Works Staff and the recommendations by the City Police and City Fire Departments, all of which state that such a signal is unnecessary and not in the best safety interest of the community. We also ask the City Council to apply common sense and consider the negative ramifications of placing a signal at the bottom of a poorly lit,3-way, narrow,dogleged,blind hill intersection. Thank you for your consideration in this important matter. Sincerely, Gordon M.Watson President, CVEHOA i 10a 11V8E ZT 85-r0-t'o Attn: Connie Brockway City Clerk From: Sherrey Hollander Huntington Beach Resident I want to voice my opinion regarding the issue of the traffic signal at the comers of Edwards and Talbert Streets at Monday's City Council Meeting, however I will not be able to attend in person that evening. I am very much opposed to any type of traffic signal at that comer for several reasons, safety and lack of necessity being two of them. I went over in great detail the turning movement study conducted by Public Works and was amazed at the low number of left hand turns from Talbert onto Northbound Edwards that were actually made in comparison to the number of right hand turns onto Edwards. Numerous residents expressed fears of 1,000's of additional cars being diverted into their neighborhood streets if left hand turns from Talbert were eliminated. These fears are based on inaccurate figures and have given many residents a false impression of the number of cars truly involved. I live in that neighborhood which would be subjected to the additional traffic but after really looking at the true figures involved, they are not enough to warrant the signal in lieu of eliminating the left hand turn lane. Of even greater concern is that of safety. The intersection has very few accidents now but if a signal was to be installed you would have those running the red lights to keep their momentum both up and down the hill. Bicyclists will not stop at the signal as they also need the speed to go up the hill and have too much speed coming down the hill. (I have done this hill many.times and have found this to be the case. I come down.the hill with my brakes fully applied and it is still near impossible to stop.) I ask you to please consider my comments in reviewing your final decision and vote for "NO TRAFFIC SIGNAL"at the intersection of Talbert and Edwards. Use the facts when making your decision and make it in the best interest of the entire community. Thank you, Mrs. Hollander I Z -b `d 9- 8dV 8bbl V3'HOV38 NOIJNIINnH - 30 All0 ' A8310 A110 03AI303H 4Z CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH JL-JC 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 April 3, 1998 Huntington Beach City School District 20451 Craimer Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attention: Mr. Jerry Buchanan Assistant Superintendent ?� Subject: Edwards Street, Street Improvements d �ornrn Dear Jerry: In response to your letter dated March 18, 1998, we have reviewed your issue regarding sd{oollb'uses traveling on Edwards Street up the hill to Ellis Avenue. We do not anticipate any probleras wo the school buses impeding the flow of traffic on Edwards since the street will be widened to ihaude two lanes in each direction. The school buses will be-able to travel in the number 2 lane, (or the right lane). All other vehicles traveling up the hill will be able to pass the school bus in the number 1 lane, (or the left lane). To review the overall project, Edwards Street grade will be reduced from 12% to 8.8%; the street wil be widened to two lanes in each direction with a raised median; it will also have marked bike lanes; and street lighting. The project also includes installing two traffic signals, one at the intersection of Edwards Street at Ellis Avenue and the second is being reviewed by the City Council on April 6, 1998, at the intersection of Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue. The traffic signal at Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue will primarily rest in green for Edwards Street and will only be stopped if there is a vehicle on Talbert Avenue waiting to turn left onto northbound Edwards or right onto southbound Edwards, (this movement will be delayed due to the dedicated right turn lane). If you have any questions regarding the above subject, please call Terri Elliott at (714) 536-5580. Sincerely, Daryl mith Acting.Director of Public Works cc: City Council Ray Silver, City Administrator Robert Eichblatt, City Engineer Z l : d 9— 8dtl 8bbl David Webb, Acting Deputy City Engineer Tom Brohard, Traffic Engineer d0 'HOV39 NOIDNIA11H Terri Elliott, Associate Civil Engineer 30 1k1{O Mary Beth Broeren, Senior Planner M330 Ally /�' � 03Ai3 38 4-02-1998 1 :01PM FRCWOOK/F I SHER 714 841 4484 P. i RECEIVED John Fisher CITY CLERK CITY OF 6692 Shetland Circle HUNTINGTON BEACH.CA Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (gqS APR -2 P April 2, 1998 Connie Brockway, City Clerk. City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor . Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Re: April 6 Agenda Item # D2 Dear HB City Council: I strongly urge you to reject the placement of a traffic signal. at Talbert and Edwards. Ten years ago, my son was among the first students bused from the Ellis/Goldenwest quartersection and after his first day of school he reported to us that the school bus was forced to back Aown Edwards Hill after making the right turn from 'Talbert because it lacked enough power to make it up the hill. Subsequently, the school district was forced to reroute the buses to Varsity. Obviously, a traffic-signal would create a dangerous situation for many underpowered vehicles (including fire trucks) increasing the risk of rear-end collisions. The solution is to place the light at Varsity where a stop sign already exists. This would allow breaks in traffic such that cars could more easily complete turns off of Talbert. Sincerely, ?hnFisher l �ubl« �eai► N - FROM ": QUANTUM SALES PHONE NO. 714 847 8160 Apr. 02 1998 02:38PM P1 C'on 2k 0 0 4 ['): ( el A-1 Cif f c � -�� ` - a.-CAAo r r\.;^ �. VII . ;A 0%.w0J r Vvr&-w-► \ t o D �, 1-t-•e.. � � - fit . V ors.' �� c'Ar-e go �ctir s l e `y�,,�,� �,•�//�� `�., .�_EA- 5 �� 1 OA-O::-`db' 05: 2P,PM PO 1 RRbM :` QUANTUM SALES PHONE NO. : 714 847 8160 Apr`. 02 1998 02:39PM P2 t1�• CC or 4-5 Ar-or ct�� r --x r !6 L e o r= Qr r Z 4-e.Ar.> �� to V-vs '44 Ae/Z.S" CA,-\ ��L: l ` ' 3 '11111) CArC 4R4 . _ eT re fePAt-&.W Lv..�x r Clq-5-REECD) CJ: PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA) } SS. PUBLIC NOTICE d NOTICE IS HEREBY County o f Orange } GIVEN that the coaetet hearing NOTICE OF velopment Permit hearing PUBLIC HEARING consists of a staff report. BEFORE THE CITY• publc hearing,City Council COUNCIL OF THE discussion and action.City I am a Citizen of the United States and a CiTYOF- above it action on the HUNTINGTON BEACH CY � ap- resident of the County aforesaid; I am �� within ( ) NOTICE IS HEREBY mission within ten (10) GIVEN that on Monday, worldng days from the date over the age of eighteen years and not a April i6,,1998.at 7:00 PM n Of receipt of Me notice of r the C Council Chambers. final city action by- the 2000 Main Street, Hur Coastal Commission pursu. party to . or interested in the below ton Beach,the City Council ant to soaori 245.32 of the will hold a public hearing Huntington Beach Zoning entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of on the followl item: and SubdivIslon ordinance REVIEW OF :PUBLIC and Section 13110 of the the H U NT i N GTO N BEACH INDEPENDENT, a WORKS COMMISSION DE- California Code of Regula- CISION ON EDWARDS lions, or unless Title 14, newspaper of general circulation printed IMPR/TALBMENTS/ Section 13573 of the Call.i IMPROVEMENTS/ COASTAL..DEVELOPMENT fornla Administrative.Code and pu Ilshed in the City of Huntington PERMIT NO.9731/MITI- Is applicable. The Coastal GATED NEGATIVE DECLM,Commission address IS Beach, County of Orange, State of RATION .NO.97-25 (ED. South Coast Area Gfgce,. WARDS STREET IM• 2DD Oceangue. loth Floor,' California and that attached Notice is a PROVEMENTS): Applicant Long--.Beact,, CA 90=- of Huntington Beach, =. phone number.(310) 071. true and complete co as was printed �"° , To Department 57N FI p copy p Aequest: .To widen Ed- ON FlLE: A copy of the wards,Street tetween 131is reposed request is on fie and published in the Huntington Beach Avenue and.Intet Drive•to Pn the. Community.. De- its ultimate.width per. the velopment Department, and Fountain Valley issues of said General Plan Circulation EY 20DO Main Street, Hunting- ement and reduce the ton Beach, Callfornla newspaper to wit the issue(s) of: south side of Talbert Av. 92648, for inspection by enue between Edwards the public. A,copy of the Street and Fleldbury Lane. staff report wig be available Location:: Edwards Street to interested parties at CrItyy (segment north of Eggs Avg Hag or the Main City LN ` enue and south of Intel brary (7111 -Talbert Av= Drive,Including Intersection .enue)after Aprti 2,1998. of-Talbert and Edwards) ALL INTERESTED PER- April 2, 1998 and Talbert Avenue (seg- SONS are Invited to attend ment from Edwards Street said hearing and express. to Fleldbury Lane) Project apinlons or submIt evt- Planner.Catherine O'Hare donee for or against the NOTICE IS HEREBY application as outlined GiVEN that an initial envi- above.it you challenge the ronmental assessment(Mlt. City Council's action. In I declare, under penalty of perjury, that ;�!0N atiorD� oe curt; ng may be limited 0.'97.29� for the above to raising on those issues Item was processed and Ycu or someone else the foregoing is true and correct. with nee forma� desalbed,�this°ice oil. ronmental Gustily AcL ft in written correspondence was determined that the delivered to the City ati:or above Items, with mtilga- prlor.to,the public hearing: tion, would not have any there there are any further Executed on April 2, 1998 significant envlronmental question* please call the effects and that a mitigated Planning refer to.the at Costa Mesa, California. ne9etivadeciarationiswar. above Item. Direct ranted. This enNronmental your; assessment Is on file at the written communications to.: C)ty of Huntington Beach the City Clerk.` I Community..Development Connie. Brockway, Department 2000 Main City Clerk,Clty.of Hun- Street, and . available for tington Beach, 2OW b P Inspection and com- Main Street,Znd Floor; ment by contacting the Huntington Beach,Community.. Development Develloopment tfornla. 9Zti4t! 714 Department. epartme 4-or-3;5�71 el� r ` , gg ) 53"227 NOTIC ►S HEREBY . Pubilshe-d Huntington GIVEN that the above Item Beach-Fountaln Valley In- S i gn a t u re Is located in the appealable dependant Aprq 2,7998 ` lurlsdiction of the Coastal '.041.245 Zone and Includes Coastal Development. Permit No. 9731, OM 0n November 17,. 1997 In conjunction with the i6rvo request e.�� .�� City Administrator's Office To: Connie Brockway From: Ray Silver, Acting City Administrator Date: March 26, 1998 Subject: Legal Notice for Hearing on CDP 97-31, Neg. Dec. 97-25 relating to the traffic signal at Edwards & Talbert By this notice, I authorize use of the Orange County Register to advertise for the public hearing on the above. Publication in the 0. C. Register is necessary since the deadline for publication in the Huntington Beach Independent was missed because of a miscommunication and more than 200 residents have already received hand carried notice of this meeting. Ray Silv , Acting City Administrator RS:PD I i T H Ew O R A N G E C O U N T Y r This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp 625 N. rand Ave., Santa Ana, CA 92701 PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ) ss. County of Orange, ) Proof of Publication of am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of twenty NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING one years, and not a party to or interested in the CoOS+a oeveloixnant Pern-0 No. 17, PUBLIC NOTICE 1veil•'incofile NuncWn itith the above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING above request. BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that tine CRY OF HUNTINGYON BEACH Coastal - printer of The Orange County Register, a NOTICE 5 HEREBY GIVEN that art hearing c of a - Morxtay./(prl a 1998,of 7:00 PM pubic heaMp.City=rL ds- h the CITY COtanCl Chambers, cussion and action.City Council newspaper of general circulation, published in the Main, Street, Hunti an action on to above Item rnaybe Beach the City Council we hold a m amsoled to 1ha ten Oj al Cori- pubic healing on the fotiowtng city of Santa Ana, County of Orange, and which "B11 the daysrna� final the �action elpfby REVIEW OF PUBLIC WORKS COM. the Coastal CortrNssion pursuant MISSION DECISION ON EDWARDS to Section 245.32 of the Hunting. newspaper has been adjudged to be a newspaper of STREEKALJIERT AVENUE IMPROVE- tpon sW odMENTSCOASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIr NO. 97.31/MIIIGATED the Calllornb Code of Reguto- eneral circulation b the Superior Court of the NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO,97- tiara. or unless Title 14. section g y P 25 (EDWAROS SWIFT IMPROVE- 13573 of the CoWwlia Admhds- MENW. 1ratHe Code is appUcable. The Countyof Orange, State of California, under the "�"`°"~ GW ks H1°'"f1Q1On Soli Coast Area address Is 9 I BeocfL PtbBC wand 0eporhinent south Corsi Area Office. 200 ReQuea.TO widen EdworM Street OOeongofe, loth FIM. Long date of November 19, 1905, Case No.A-21046 that Dive Eft ,,,,ue Perm nuOChr�,n,ba<:�10)sia5o 1.. General Ron Circulation Elernerd ON FILE:A copy o1 the Proposed and reduce the south side of the notice, of which the annexed is a true printed Talbert Avenue between Edwards requestBan file In the Community Street and Flela"Lane. Development Department,2000 Loealla- Eowards.Sheet )sag- Main Street. Huntington Beach, copy, has been published in each regular and entire 'nerd north of Elh Avenue and California 92648, far Inspection south Of W din Inlet D",Including Index- Pubic.A copy of the staff (section of Tobed and Edwards) report will be ava�tlbdyb�le to Inter- issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement .EdwodsT mar to=� LMN ibrary Troir the Avva- Lane) nue)aver"?III thereof on the following dates, to wit: a PIS �°"'�''"e n ed to PERSONS�^°Q� NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an 04-0 agrbru or sub"eN- intifal environmental assesungnt Bence for or against the apoico- (Mrt�ared Ne�Ne Declaraitun tfon as outined-above. If you No.red far the above trem challenge the City Co ncrs ac- MARCH 7'7 l A f3 Processed and corpleted h arc- bon h court.You may be Bmlted +--r cwknce with the Coulomb Envf-to rasing Duty those h—You Of ronrnnenfal Quality Act. B was someone else raised at the public deternwVd that the above Bens, Ong described In this notice. With Mm9ahom wouutd not have a h written correspondence de any gNf envirorrfngntal ef- ivered t0 the CttY at,a prfar to. tech and that a mMlgated raga the pubic hearing. n there are five deClaratian a warranted.1Hs MY furor questions please call ernhorrrnental ossesvrnent Is an.the Planning Division:at 536-5271, file at the city Of H nfrom ornd refer tO the above Item.q•i Beach Cortrrnantty Development rest Yana w iften cornrntnkations Department. 2000 Main meet,to fhe City Clerk- and is ovallab is for public hspec- Connie Brockway,CRY Clerk bon and cornnent by contacting City of Huntington Beach the Cornrn' N 0eveloPRnertt. 2000 Main Sheet.'2nd Floor (714�j 53a�5t bV t8iW= : Huntington Beach, Calitomb 92648 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the (714)536.5227 "1 certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury above item Is bcofed h me as Publish:aarnge county Register peoloble knLsdk uon of the March 27.1998 under the laws of the State of California that the coastal Zara and includes 3Q7000I00 R-593 foregoing is true and correct": Date APRTT, 1 - , 19 98 Signature PRO F OF PUBLICATION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday,April 6, 1998,at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following item: REVIEW OF PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION DECISION ON EDWARDS STREET/ TALBERT AVENUE EVIPROVEMENTS/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO.97- 311NIITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO.97-25(EDWARDS STREET IMPROVEMENTS): Applicant: City of Huntington Beach,Public Works Department Re guest: To widen Edwards Street between Ellis Avenue and Inlet Drive to its ultimate width per the General Plan Circulation Element and reduce the south side of Talbert Avenue between Edwards Street and Fieldbury Lane. Location: Edwards Street(segment north of Ellis Avenue and south of Inlet Drive, including intersection of Talbert and Edwards)and Talbert Avenue(segment from Edwards Street to Fieldbury Lane) Project Planner: Catherine O'Hara NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an initial environmental assessment(Mitigated Negative Declaration No.97-25)for the above item was processed and completed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. It was determined that the above items,with mitigation,would not have any significant environmental effects and that a mitigated negative declaration is warranted. This environmental assessment is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department,2000 Main Street, and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community Development Department,or by telephoning(714) 536-5271. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the above item is located in the appealable jurisdiction of the Coastal Zone and includes Coastal Development Permit No.97-31,filed on November 17, 1997, in conjunction with the above request. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Coastal Development Permit hearing consists of a staff report, public hearing,City Council discussion and action. City Council action on the above item may be appealed to the Coastal Commission within ten(10)working days from the date of receipt of the notice of final City action by the Coastal Commission pursuant to Section 245.32 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and Section 13110 of the California Code of Regulations,or unless Title 14, Section 13573 of the California Administrative Code is applicable. The Coastal Commission address is South Coast Area Office,200 Oceangate, loth Floor,Long Beach,CA 90802-4302,phone number: (310) 570-5071. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department,2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,California 92648,for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library(7111 Talbert Avenue)after April 2, 1998. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court;you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice,or in written correspondence delivered to the City at,or prior to,the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning Division at 536-5271 and refer to the above item. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street,2nd Floor Huntington Beach,California 92648 (714)536-5227 100 Radius Resident Labels Resident . Resident Resident 6481 Newbury 18012 Lakepoint Ln. 18022 Lakepoint Ln. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Resident Resident Resident 18042 Lakepoint Ln. 18052 Lakepoint Ln. 18062 Lakepoint Ln. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Resident Resident Resident 18072 Lakepoint Ln. 18082 Lakepoint Ln. 18092 Lakepoint Ln. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Resident Resident Resident 18102 Lakepoint Ln. 18122 Lakepoint Ln. 18132 Lakepoint Ln. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Resident Resident Resident : 18142 Lakepoint Ln. 18152 Lakepoint Ln. 18162 Lakepoint Ln. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Resident Resident Resident 18151 Lakepoint Ln. 18161 Lakepoint Ln. 18142 Brentwell Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Resident Resident Resident 18152 Brentwell Cir. 18141 Brentwell Cir. 18151 Brentwell Cir. Huntington Beach,,CA 92647 Huntington Beach,CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Resident Resident Resident 18132 Fieldbury Ln. - 18152 Fieldbury Ln. 18011 Clearwater Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Resident Resident Resident 18021 Clearwater Cir. 18031 Clearwater Cir. 18041 Clearwater Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 100' Radius Resident Labels S labelsArm Resident Resident Resident 18051 Clearwater Cir. 18061 Clearwater Cir. 18071 Clearwater Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Resident Resident Resident 18081 Clearwater Cir. 18091 Clearwater Cir. 18101 Clearwater Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Resident Resident Resident 18111 Clearwater Cir. 6411 Talegate Dr. 6401 Talegate Dr. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Resident Resident Resident 6391 Talegate Dr. 6381 Talegate Dr. 18191 Fieldbury Ln. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Resident Resident Resident 18201 Fieldbury Ln. 18181 Leaf Cir. 18141 Fieldbury Ln. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647. Resident Resident Resident 18121 Fieldbury Ln. 18132 Wellbrook Cir. 6541 Silverspur Ln. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Resident Resident � _ 13ree 5 6531 Silverspur Ln. 6551 Silverspur Ln. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 {fi n &G Ulk, GreS 1-1�1 $1 � - ►gc�t 1 or � LA. "lei;Z r'a�r�-s�de— G✓: 1n t � -1 �x '5)ZULf G2 tee� �x�..--�� U�-<�e:rS /�►.�bi e, Ol�r) �IawS T. C,v1.1^be.,✓�- E�-x�'�s )2(ak lIP 331 k�j � P�os.ti,Ch q2 uyg PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST "B" MAILING LABELS - March 19, 1998 Pre9dr,nt 1 Huntin rbor POA 10 FANS 16 H.B.Cham Commerce P. O. Box 791 Carol Ann Wall 2210 Main Street, Sult Sunset Beach,CA 90742 Chambers Newsletter Publishers Huntington Beach,CA 9264 P.O.Box 5458 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 juarSep,n 2 William D.Holman 11 Ed ittlebury 17 Orange Coun soc.of Realtors PLC Gldn Si. o Owners Leag. 25552 La Paz Road 23 Corporate Plaza,Suite 250 11021 Magnolia Blv . Laguna Hills, CA 92653 Newport Beach CA 92660-7912 Garden Grove, CA 92642 President 3 Mr. Tom Zanic 12 Pacific Coast Archaeological 18 Amigos De Bolsa Chica New Urban West Society,Inc. P.O.Box 3748 520 Broadway Ste. 100 P.O. Box 10926 Huntington Beach, CA 92605 Santa Monica,CA 90401 Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Attn:Jane Gothold Sunset Beach Community Assoc. 4 Pr .Hist.Society 13 County of Orange/EMA 19 Pat resident C/O Newlan a Museum Michael M.Ruane,Dir. PO Box 215 19820 Beach Blvd. P.O.Box 4048 Sunset Beach, CA 9074 - Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Santa Ana, CA 92702-4048 res' 5 Chai erson 14 County of Orange/EMA 19 Huntington h Tomorrow Histori rces Bd. Thomas Mathews PO Box 865 Comm.Services Dep . P. O.Box 4048 Huntington Beach, CA 92 2000 Main St. Santa Ana,CA 92702-4048 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 J 'e Vandermost 6 Coun Aging 15 Planning Department 19 BIA- 1706 Orange Orange County EMA 9 Executive Circ 0 Huntington Beach,CA P.O.Box 4048 Irvine Ca 92714-6734 Santa Ana, CA 92702-4048 Richard Spicer 7 Jeff Metzel 16 County of Orange/EMA 19 SCAG Seacliff HOA Tim Miller 818 West 7th, 12th Floor 19391 Shady Harbor Circle P.O.Box 4048 Los Angeles,CA 90017 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Santa Ana,CA 92702-4048 E.T.I.Corral 100 8 John Roe 16 Planning 1 . 20 Mary Bell Seacliff HOA City of Costa Mesa 20292 Eastwood Cir. 19382 Surfdale Lane P. O.Box 1200 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Costa Mesa,CA 92628-1200 e ski, 9 Lou Mannone 16 P Dir. 21 Environmental o hairman Seacliff HOA City of Fou Valley 20021 Lawson Lane 19821 Ocean Bluff Circle 10200 Slater Ave. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 gaabelAphn)bls PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST "B" MAILING LABELS - March 19, 1998 Wing Director 22 Jer n 29 Country View Estates HOA 37 City o nster HB City Elementa hool Dist. Gerald Chapman 8200 Westminster 20451 Craimer Lane 6742 Shire Circle Westminster, CA 92683 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 ing Director 23 James Jones 30 HB Hamptons HOA 37 City o each Oce�rYi Iementary Keystone Pacific Prop.Mangmt.Inc. 211 Eight St. School district 4100 Newport Place,Suite 350 Seal Beach,CA 90740 17200 Pinehurst Lane Newport Beach, Ca 92660 Huntington Beach CA 92647 California Coastal Commission 24 �ier 31 ally Graham38 Theresa Henry Westmr e 1 District ea AreaSouth Coast Area Office 14121 arwood Ave 5161 Gelding I 200 Oceangate, loth Floor Westminster CA 92683 Huntington Beach, Long Beach,CA 92802-4302 California Coastal Commission 24 och 32 Chery a wning 38 South Coast Area Office HB Union chool Disrict Meadowlark Are 200 Oceangate, loth Floor 10251 Yorktown Ave 16771 Roosevelt Lane _____Long Beach, CA 92802-4302 Huntington Beach,CA 9264 Huntington Beach,CA 92649 ben Joseph 25 33 Koll Company 39 Calt ict 12 �30E Way#200 4343 Von Karman 2501 Pullman St. Tustin,CA 9268 Newport Beach, CA 92666 Santa Ana,CA 92705 Director 26 Goldenwest College 34 lid Waste En£Agy. At red Owens O.C.Healt i Agency 15744 Go st St. P.O.Box 355 Huntington Beach 647 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Growth Coordinator 27 OC County Harbors,Beach 35 Huntington Post Office and Parks Dept. 6771 Warner Ave. P. O.Box 4048 Huntington Beach,CA 9264 Santa Ana, CA 92702-4048 Marc Ecker 28 Huntington Beach Mall 36 �o alley Att Rogers-Laude Elementary S`c9o-tyWstrict 7777 Edinger 0 17210 Oak Street Huntington Beach CA 92 Fountain Valley CA 92708 Dr ane Dishno 29 Country View Estates HOA 37 HB City ary School Dist. Carrie Thomas PO Box 71 6642 Trotter Drive Huntington Beach,CA 9262 Huntington Beach CA 92648 g:labels\phnlbls 110-015-48 159-011-01 159-011-02 Signal Companies Inc Greg J. Wiese Donald William Noreen .4343 Von Karman Ave. 18011 Westlake Cir 18021 Westlake Cir Newport Beach CA 92660 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 9264% 159-011-03 159-011-04 159-011-05 Allen F. Leof John L. Pranin Delores Magnus 18031 Westlake Cir 2018 Jaybrook Dr. 1416 Victoria Ave. . Huntington Beach - CA 92648 Rancho Palos Verdes CA 90 Upland CA 91786 159-011-06 159-011-07 159-011-08 Edward H. Harrison Leif Thompson David Joel Sandler 18061 Westlake Cir 18071 Westlake Cir 18081 Westlake Cir Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648• 159-011-09 159-011-10 159-011-11 Muhs 1992 Partnership Eugene E. Conley Jack J. Quinton 6921 Loyola Dr. 18101 Westlake Cir 18111 Westlake Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92646 159-011-12 159-011-13 159-011-14 .Ronald A. Hayes John G. Robbins Jimmie P. Reaves 18112 Freshwater Cir 18102 Freshwater Cir 18092 Freshwater Cir Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 9264$ 159-011.-15 159-011-16 159-011-17_ William R. Saksa Vasile Valentin Tifrea Craig Susskind 18082 Freshwater Cir 18072 Freshwater Cir 18062 Freshwater Cir __Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 159-011-18 159-011-19 159-011-20 Timothy P. Turner Allan R. White John Michael Barrett 18052 Freshwater Cir P.O. Box 3053 18151 Riverside Cir Huntington Beach CA 92648 Big Bear Lake CA 92315 Huntington Beach CA 9264@ 159-011-21 159-011-22 159-011-23 Jeffrey J. Millar Jeffrey J. Millar Margo Lynn Gayler 18022 Freshwater Cir 18022 Freshwater Cir 18011 Freshwater Cir Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92646 159-011-24 159-011-25 159-011-26 SZEKERESH Robert Wendy C. Cockley Charles N. Baker 18021 Freshwater Cir 18031 Freshwater Cir 18041 Freshwater Cir Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 9264 159-011-27 159-011-28 159-011-29 John Quilico Anthony C. Minniti Allen J. Stroh, 18051 Freshwater Cir P.O. Box 1862 18071 Freshwater Cir Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 9264; 159-011=30 159-011-31 159-011-32 toger L. Garland Dale Robert Baker Alana HSUEH Ching Cheng 18081 Freshwater Cir 18091 Freshwater Cir 981 Paseo La Cresta luntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Palos Verdes Estates CA CPA,? 159-011-33 159-011-34 159-011-35 John L. Price Donald W. Claypool Richard R. Stevens 18111 Freshwater Cir 18112 Clearwater Cir 18102 Clearwater Cir Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 9264 ' 159-011-36 159-011-37 159-011-38 Harold Ronald Cook Michael T. Petrozzi Patricia Ann Haas 18092 Clearwater Cir 17422 Caspers Cir 18072 Clearwater Cir Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 9264 Y 159-011-39 159-011-40 159-011-41 Herbert B. Coleman Abraham Asher Daniel Needham 18062 Clearwater Cir 18052 Clearwater Cir 18042 Clearwater Cir Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 9264f 159-011-42 159-011-43 159-011-44 Marian Violet Meyers John Michael Barrett William P. Wills 800 12Th Ave. 18151 Riverside Cir 18012 Clearwater Cir Sweet Home OR 97386 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-011-45 159-011-46 159-011-47 Robert D. Jensen Asele Rouchleau James E. Ellis 18011 Clearwater Cir 18021 Clearwater Cir 18031 Clearwater Cir Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 9264$ 159-011-48 159-011-49 159-011-50 Roy M. Sarver Alector C. Ramos Margaret T. Bradley 18041 Clearwater Cir 18051 Clearwater Cir 18061 Clearwater Cir Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 9264 159-011-51 159-011-52 159-011-53 Robert J. Le Blanc Philip A. Gerrity Daniel Negrete 7159.W. 91st St . 18081 Clearwater Cir 18091 Clearwater Cir Los Angeles CA 90045 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92642 159-011-54 159-011-55 159-071-01 Michael Loperfido Robert James Hill Alfonso R. Cracchiolo 18101 Clearwater .Cir 18111 Clearwater Cir 6211 Newbury Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92647 15.9-071-02 159-071-03 159-071-04 Thomas R. Sosa Ronald Fox Barry O'Donnell C-01i _ NPwhury Dr. 6241 Newbury Dr. 159-071-05 159-071-06 159-071-07 Gordon L. Carpenter Arthur F. Collins Steven I . Paczko 6251 Newbury Dr. 6271 Newbury Dr. P.O. Box 2329 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-071-08 159-071-09 159-071-10 Richard M. Ehret John G. Hatala Kenneth W. Carpenter 6291 Newbury Dr. 6301 Newbury Dr. 6311 Newbury Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 9264 7 159-071-11 159-071-12 159-071-13 David W. Mollica Brentley M. Warren Edward Daniel Pelant 6331 Newbury Dr. 6341 Newbury Dr. 3020 Earlmar Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Los Angeles CA 90064 159-071-14 159-072-01 159-072-02 David A. Derush Robert D. Lundberg Jeffrey A. Moulton 6361 Newbury Dr. 6292 Newbury Dr. 6302 Newbury Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 9264 7 159-072-03 159-072-04 159-072-05 Matt A. Cramer Robert V. Reider Peter F. Brust 6312 Newbury Dr. 5795 Martin Rd. 6342 Newbury Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92647 Baldwin Park CA 91706 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-072-06 159-072-07 159-072-08 Ronald H. Bernhard Larry G. Munro Takanao Matsubara 6352 Newbury Dr. 6362 Newbury Dr. 6372 Newbury Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-072-09 159-072-10 159-072-11 Ying Thomason Wang Stanley D. Clark Dale B. Hagey 14544 Pebblewood Dr. 6361 Glenfox Dr. 6351 Glenfox Dr. North Potomac MD 20878 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-072-12 159-072-13 159-072-14 Brian C. Cowie Michael F. Cook Frank A. Ursich 6341 Glenfox Dr. 6331 Glenfox Dr. 6311 Glenfox Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 9264 i 159-072-15 159-072-16 159-073-01 Mark E. Daggett George S. Rubio Sean P. Keegan 6301 Glenfox Dr. 6291 Glenfox Dr. 6222 Newbury Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92642 159-073-02 159-073-03 159-073-04 Donahue Trust Viola J. Stewart David Rynerson ---- -- . 6252 Newbury Dr. 6272 Newbury Dr. 159-073-05 159-073-06 159-073-07 Diane K. Mc Clarin Raymond B. Dirling George F. Beaucage 18051 Heathpoint Lane 18061 Heathpoint Lane 18071 Heathpoint Lane Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-073-08 159-073-09 159-073-10 Chester P. Tomsick Gary F. Mc Connell Mark L. Burnett 6282 Glenfox Dr. 6292 Glenfox Dr. 6302 Glenfox Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-073-11 159-073-12 159-073-13 William M. Prats Sallie J. Walker Russell G. Jones 18081 Wellbrook Cir 18091 Wellbrook Cir 18101 Wellbrook Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-073-14 159-074-01 159-074-02 James A. Stringer Charles H. Bunten Stephan P. Rubino 18121 Wellbrook Cir 18132 Wellbrook Cir 18112 Wellbrook Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-074-03 159-074-04 159-074-05 Joseph Paul Donner Roy Miller Ronald J. Zawistowski 18102 .Wellbrook. Cir 18092 Wellbrook Cir 1009 Daisy Ave. Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Carlsbad CA 92009 159-074-06 159-074-07 159-074-08 James G. Banville James M. Schellenberg Richard Odell 18081 Fieldbury Lane 18091 Fieldbury Lane 18101 Fieldbury Lane Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-074-09 159-074-10 159-074-11 Sacha Marcroft Patrick Chi-Kong Chan Jerome K. Mandich 18111 Fieldbury Lane 18121 Fieldbury Lane 18141 Fieldbury Lane Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-079-01 159-079-02 159-081-01 Signal Companies Inc Signal . Companies Inc Michael C. Springman 4343 Von Karman Ave. 4343 Von Karman Ave. 6971 Lawn Haven Dr. Newport Beach. CA 92660 Newport Beach CA 92660 Huntington Beach CA 926411 159-081-02 159-081-03 159-081-04 Kenneth H. Bennett Victoriano Ambata John T. Page 6401 Newbury Dr. 6411 Newbury Dr. 6421 Newbury Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-081-05 159-081-06 159-081-07 John T. Horton John Pulley Kenneth W. Smith �a �+ TT n,.,1,,,rti T)r 9 A 9 1 NPwl-n rir Mr L59-081-08 159-081-09 159-081-10 3ruce H. West Robert W. Lillis William W. Howatt S471 Newbury Dr. 6481 Newbury Dr. 18012 Lakepoint Lane 3untington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-081-11 159-081-12 159-081-13 Mark A. Cummins State Street BK & Tr Albert M. Corbett 18022 Lakepoint Lane 18052 Lakepoint Lane Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-081-14 159-081-15 159-081-16 Michael F. Sherman Peter J. Jakubowski Eric E. Spencer 18062 Lakepoint Lane 18072 Lakepoint Lane 18082 Lakepoint Lane Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-081-17 159-081-18 159-082-01 William F. Payne Terry L. Orosco Dwight L. Andersen 18092 Lakepoint Lane 18102 Lakepoint Lane 18122 Lakepoint Lane Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-082-02 159-082-03 159-082-04 Steven Dana Nicholson James F. Herbold Bart Hollander 18132. Lakepoint Lane 18142 Lakepoint Lane 18152 Lakepoint Lane Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-082-05 159-083-01 159-083-02 Maxwell J. Smith James D. Jones Tim J. Wegner 18162 Lakepoint Lane 6382 Newbury Dr. 6402 Newbury Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-083-03 159-083-04 159-083-05 Ernest Kocsis Vincent Walker Katherine A. Nichols 6412 Newbury Dr. 6422 Newbury Dr. 6432 Newbury Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 . Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-083-06 159-083-07 159-083-08 Alfred J. Bilotti David M. Polancic John G. Huber 16357 Wimbledon Lane 6462 Newbury Dr. 2772 Rickenbacker Ct . Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Orefield PA 18069 159-083-09 159-083-10 159-083-11 Carl 0. Staley Manuel Reyes Robert M. Blum 6471 Glenfox Dr. 6461 Glenfox Dr. 6451 Glenfox Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-083-12 159-083-13 159-083-14 William J. Trounce Paul D. Twedt Daniel Perry Becker Ca�i rlenfox Dr. 6411 Glenfox Dr. 159-083-15 159-083-16 159-084-01 June Coast Properties Susan L. Harris Bruce Alan Fischer 18652 Florida St . No. 300 6381 Glenfox Dr. 18081 Lakepoint Lane Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 9264' 159-084-02 159-084-03 159-084-04 Mary C. Fleury Anthony Yturralde Velda L. King P.O. Box 1312 5196 California Ave . 18111 Lakepoint Lane Huntington Beach CA 92647 Norco CA 91760 Huntington Beach CA 9264' 159-084-05 159-084-06 159-084-07 Benjamin Benson Bernard Bendow Richard M. Garay 18121 Lakepoint Lane 18131 Lakepoint Lane 18141 Lakepoint Lane Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 9264, 159-084-08 159-084-09 159-084-10 Dixie L. Long Alan J. Reid Charles M. Lanning 18151 Lakepoint Lane 18161 Lakepoint Lane 18152 Brentwell Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington .Beach CA 9264; 159-084-11 159-084-12 159-084-13 Russ Kalander Moon Fai Siu David W. Ellis 18142 Brentwell Cir 18132 Brentwell Cir 16862 Sea Wi-tch Lane Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92641 159-084-14 159-084-15 159-084-16 William B. Smallshaw Robert Harrison Beam Bonnie G. Ainsworth 18112 Brentwell Cir 18102 Brentwell Cir 18092 Brentwell Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 9264, 159-084-17 159-085-01 159-085-02 Don W. Griffiths James P. Ruziecki Bertil V. Bystrom 18082 Brentwell Cir 18081 Brentwell Cir 18091 Brentwell Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 9264 159-085-03 159-085-04 159-085-05 David Richard Mears June Coast Properties Brian A. White 18101 Brentwell Cir 18652 Florida St . No. 300 18121 Brentwell Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 9264 159-085-06 159-085-07 159-085-08 Val J. Benincosa Richard A. Buccola Steve A. O' Keefe 18131 Brentwell Cir 18141 Brentwell Cir 18151 Brentwell Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 9264 159-085-09 159-085-10 159-085-11 Hong Cheol Kim Jack D. Maley Brian Thomas Fronk 18191 Fieldbury Lane 18132 Fieldbury Lane 18122 Fieldbury Lane Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 926 159-085-12 • 159-085-13 is159-085-14 Jerry'Robert Jaso Raymond J. Shaw Charles Robert Poe 18112 Fieldbury Lane 18102 Fieldbury Lane 18092 Fieldbury Lane Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 159-085-15 159-089-01 159-251-01 William M. Prats Signal Companies Inc Peter J. Sequeira 18081 Wellbrook Circle 4343 Von Karman Ave. 766-0 Calle Aragon Huntington Beach CA 92647 Newport Beach CA 92660 Laguna Hills CA 92653 159'-251-02 159-251-03 159-251-04 Aurand Trust Beverly J. Hanon John Michael Barrett 18131 Riverside Cir 18141 Riverside Cir 18151 Riverside Cir Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92641 159-251-05 159-251-06 159-252-01 Mark R. Johnston Rexford T. Parker Swasdi Pothikanjorn 18161 Riverside Cir 18171 Riverside Cir 9642 Chevy Chase Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 9264 159-252-02 159-252-03 159-252-04 Verna Creciat Michael A. Ivy Philip F. Finston 18152 Riverside Cir 18162 Riverside Cir 18172 Riverside Cir Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 9264 t 159-252-05 04 159-252-06 159-252-07 Robert J. Schmidl Charles A. Moss Hyo Gap Pang P.O. Box 1559 18192 Riverside Cir 18211 Leaf Cir Sacramento CA 95812 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 9264 159-252-08 159-252-09 159-252-10 . Rudolf Weber Jimmie R. Argott Robert Joe Geraci 18207 Leaf Cir 18201 Leaf Cir 18197 Leaf Cir Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 159-252-11 159-252-12 159-252-13 Michael R. Lazear Sergio E. Quintanar Steven L. Hamstrom 18195 Leaf Cir 18191 Leaf Cir 18185 Leaf Cir Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 9264? 159-252-14 159-252-15 159-252-16 Gary E. Altunian Carl R. Zaptiff Russell S. Buccola 18181 Leaf Cir 18182 Leaf Cir 18192 Leaf Cir Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92649 159-252-17 159-252-18 159-252-19 Walter R. Smith Gary Hegenbart Surendra P. Patel 18202 Leaf Cir 18206 Leaf Cir 18212 Leaf Cir Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach .CA 9264] 59-252-20 159-252-21 159-252-22 ames Koch Jerry L. Gabel Dina Braendle 301 Pacemont Dr. 6311 Pacemont Dr. 18261 Fieldbury Lane untington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 9264$ 59-252-23 159-252-24 159-252-25 ames J. Elser James A. White Charles M. Bell 8251 Fieldbury Lane 18241 Fieldbury Lane 18231 Fieldbury Lane :untington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92641 .59-252-26 159-252-27 159-252-28 ,tephen Chaing Pa Liu Gerald L. Jones Hong Cheol Kim .8211 Fieldbury Lane 18201 Fieldbury Lane 18191 Fieldbury Lane iuntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648' L59-253-01 159-253-02 159-253-03 Tason Sung Kim William Alan Drummond Richard S. Marchant 5381 Talegate Dr. 6391 Talegate Dr. 6401 Talegate Dr. 3untington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 159-253-04 159-254-01 159-254-02 Thomas B. Burket - Patrick O. Pierce - Alan Hurst 5411 Talegate Dr. 18312 Fieldbury Lane 18302 Fieldbury Lane Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 9264 ' 159-254-03 159-254-04 159-254-05 Steve Kelepecz Irene E. Guarderas Thomas Greer 18292 Fieldbury Lane 18282 Fieldbury Lane 18272 Fieldbury Lane Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92641 159-254-06 159-254-07 159-254-08 Michael D. Hawkins David R. Scott Robert Michowski 18262 Fieldbury Lane 18252 Fieldbury Lane 18242 Fieldbury Lane Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 9264P 159-254-09 159-254-10 159-254-11 Joseph L. Notrica Jay B. Zaidenberg Daniel J. Mc Donald 6372 Talegate Dr. 6382 Talegate Dr.' 6392 Talegate Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 9264$ - 159-255-01 159-255-02 159-255-03 . Norman L. Mayer Antonio V. Banaag Tan Tan Ngo 6212 Pacemont Dr. 6222 Pacemont Dr. 6232 Pacemont Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92649 159-255-04 159-255-05 159-255-06 David A. Desataff Darry K. Webb Ronald R. Evans 9977 Aar-amnnt- nr .59-255-07 159-255-08 159-255-09 :oward G. Kaufman Jung Hong Kim Heidi De Britton 1756 Sicily Cir 6292 Pacemont Dr. 6302 Pacemont Dr. funtington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92Aq 1-59-255-10 159-255-11 159-255-12 :hul Yung Jung Dino L. Amador Theo Rola 1-8291 Fieldbury Lane Box 1664 Abqaiq 18311 Fieldbury Lane iuntington Beach CA 92648 Saudi Arabia 31311 Huntington Beach CA 92Gy$ 159-255-13 159-255-14 159-255-15 Thomas A. Buksa William E. Palmer Gregory Timothy Berber 6271 Moonfield Dr. 6261 Moonfield Dr. 6251 Moonfield Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92&14$ 159-255-16 159-255-17 159-255-18 Mark Bolton Edwin M. Kimoto Gerald A. Wegman 6241 Moonfield Dr. 6231 Moonfield Dr. 6221 Moonfield Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 9244V 159-255-19 159-255-20 159-259-01 Vaughn S. Elmore Kurt Markshausen Signal Companies Inc 6211 Moonfield Dr. - 6201 Moonfield Dr. 17890 Sky Park Cir Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Irvine CA 92614 159-391-09 159-391-10 159-391-11 Edward D. Laurance Theodore G. Lasker Eric Rescigno 6581 Silverspur Lane 6571 Silverspur Lane 6551 Silverspur Lane Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92412 159-391-12 159-391-13 159-391-14 Dennis F. D'Ambra Kevin P. Conlisk Richard L. Amaral 6541 Silverspur Lane 6531 Silverspur Lane 6525 Silverspur Lane Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 9;649 159-391-36 159-391-53 Ronald Irving Brindle Richard C. Davis 6521 Silverspur Lane 6562 Silverspur Lane Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 159 01122 159 072 04 159 074 02 Olson, Robert Robert V. Reider Bacon Thomas 18012 Freshwater Cr 5795 Martin Rd. 6771 Corral Cr Huntington Beach, CA 926478 Irwindale CA 91706 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 159 074 08 159 081 01 159 081 12 McLaughling John Michael C. Springman Zell John M 18101 Fieldbury Ln 6974 Lawn haven Dr 18042 Lakepoint Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach,CA 92647 159 084 13 159 255 05 159 255 09 David W. Ellis Gam Michael Hetzler Robert 18123 Brentwell Cr 6262 Pacemont Dr. 6302 Pacemont Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk .Y - P.O. Box 190 �7 _ F. 25 :o i Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ,..;r z its 97-31 4 X.N. W i Lin��'✓f 159-259-01 6 nn � jINST0,r �`' Signal Companies nc000, 17890 Sky Park y Irvine CA 92614 Mow RETURN -q 70. .sr-_t��F -4- rr R i � �J NIA - PUBLIC HEARING _ i ] t i 1Ij %24.1 fir/ L:Ca�C3Y CA ►� �i.l....�.l.11...i..li...i..l.11 I!1'ii�lili��!!jl11111!' Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach U.S.KXiTMIE Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 U 0'.'- 2 a.u. 1i METER Pt' 159-252-05 ot Ozi P.O. Box 1559 ING Sacramento CA 95812 NTI LEGAL NOTICE- PUBLIC HEARING Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach _•„ GT�h' U.S.POS AGE n ' Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 �. 03i27i9a SAN7A -r „#,36.�-1Jt'� Huntington Beach,CA 92648 _ w�....� ,.� y f •max.; " � 1 ter..... � •*`�: k {I r, 159-255-11 Dino L. AmadozZ _ �O y' ' ,e�i• 11N6T Box 1664 Abqaiq G�"�wt�✓ ��T► ��!'� Saudi Arabia 31311 • LEGAL NOTICE- PUBLIC HEARING Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 _�OL-. Huntington Beach,CA 92648 1 0.�. -, 3� C r r H M.C T F-R 555 Xx-54-3-3ra 159084 13 David W. Elfis 18122kBrentwell Cr Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Ilk ELLII23 RETURN 926472014 IN al 03/2a/%n-d TO SENDER ORW I ON FILE AD 0 R D E 2,_"L L To-t tD R rR'ET ' 0 AL NOTICE- PUBLIC HEARING FV.'DG OR EX P I RE • hp 04"le CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH DATE: 4/7/98 TO: Scott Hess, Senior Planner FROM: Connie Brockway, City Clerk RE: Legal Notification Process My office continues to be appreciative of the process you have established regarding provision of public hearing property owner notification labels to the Clerk's Office. The last hearing and a few times previously have had the extra page of updated labels with problems that can easily be corrected by your intern. The two attached examples: David Ellis had address updated (although a typo occurred - - however an [ additional] owner(Mark Hoffman) was not included in update. The other example should have had [Robert Schmidt deleted] and Department of Veterans Affairs - State of California inserted. The P. O. Box is correct. The City Clerk's Office would appreciate your intern changing the complete label when updating. Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach U.S.po."7AC,C Office of the City Clerk .P.O. Box 190 -i '.0- 3 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 U L.2 r H MCTEff 159084 13 04iO. INS David W. Ellis 1812ABrentwell Cr Huntington Beach, CA 92647 ELLI123 926472014 IN 21 03/20/96 RETURN TO SENDER .sever mac• ORDE ON FILE R E RWARD 10 FWOG O EXP11RE AL NOTICE- PUBLIC HEARING R R E�— Connie Brockway.City Clerk 10&- U.S.Mi*W.E City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 4W. Huntington Beach,CA 92648 H METER S 1,"1 Cil. 4b- 159-252-05 o Rob s 411 ert J. Schmidl 9 p.0. BOX 1559 ING Sacramento CA 95812 LEGAL NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING ssb%.2 1 s Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach �oz O�' U.S.PO-Z"WA n s s f 4 Office of the City Clerk '(7 a zx 03/ZZ�98 ;SAN'TA P.O. Box 190 +ti'S� �' tShR�t �8 r; . '•? Huntington Beach,CA 92648 P.ME TER 5� 159-255-11 Dino L. Amadoi� t Box 1664 Abgaig IN6 11 r Arabia 313 O Saudi Ar �NUNTI �� LEGAL NOTICE- PUBLIC HEARING ^'\ STATEMENT OF ACTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Council Chamber, Civic Center Huntington Beach, California Monday, April 6, 1998 A videotape recording of this meeting is on file in the Office of the City Clerk. The regular meeting of the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach was called to order at 5:00 p.m. CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ROLL CALL PRESENT: Harman, Green, Dettloff, Bauer, (Sullivan arrived at 5:10 p.m., Garofalo at 5:15 p.m.) ABSENT: Julien D-2. (City Council) Public Hearinq -Review Of Public Works Decision On Edwards Street/Talbert Avenue Improvements& Consideration By Council Of Coastal Development Permit No. 97- 31/Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 97-25(Edwards Street Improvements) A motion was made by Harman, seconded by Garofalo, to approve the following recommended action: Recommended Action: Motion to: 1. Uphold the February 18, 1998, Public Works Commission support of a traffic signal at Edwards Street and Talbert Avenue; and 2. Approve Negative Declaration 97-25 (Attachment No. 4)with findings and mitigation measures as set forth in (Attachment No. 2)to the Request for Council Action dated April 6, 1998; and 3. Approve Coastal Development Permit No. 97-31 with findings and conditions of approval as set forth in (Attachment No. 2) to the Request for Council Action dated April 6, 1998. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Harman, Green, Dettloff, Bauer, Sullivan, Garofalo NOES: None ABSENT: Julien The meeting adjourned to Monday, April, 13, 1998 at 5:00 p.m., in Room B-8, City Hall, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach California and Tuesday, April 14, 1998, at 7:30 a.m., at the Waterfront Hilton Beach Resort, 21100 Pacific Coast Highway, Huntington Beach, California. /s/Connie Brockway City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California ATTEST: /s/Connie Brockway /s/ Ralph Bauer City Clerk/Clerk Mayor STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) County of Orange ) ss: City of Huntington Beach ) I, Connie Brockway, the duly elected City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and.correct Statement of Action of the City Council of said City at their regular meeting held on the April 6, "1998. Witness my hand and seal of the said City of Huntington Beach this 10th day of April, 1998. /s/Connie Brockway City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California By Deputy y Clerk �. NPDES GENERA 1.CONSTRUCTION SITES SHAJ NED IN SUCH A CONDITION THAT AN ANTICIPATED STORM DOES N RY WASTES OR POLLUTANTS,�OFF THE SITE. CKIY OF ��---'jp�(' T ,',1; •. "' WNFTi DISCHNECESES OSNiY FOR PERFORMANCEF MATERIAL ENAND OCO APLETION OTER ARE FLLCONSTRUCTION ,UL, ``/ �.� *`. 'ryrt ..fix, PRACTICES AND WHERE THEY DO NOT:CAUSE OR CONTRIBUTE�T'O A VIOLATION OF ANY WATER QUALITY STANDARD;CAUSE OR THREATEN TO CAUSE•'". POLLUTION.11 CONTAMINATION.OR NUISANCE;OR CONTAIN A HAZARDOUS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ' SUBSTANCE IN A QUANTITY REPORTABLE UNDER FEDERAL REGULATIONS 40 CFR PARE$ 117 k 302. a. _ POTENTIAL POLLUTANTS INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO: SOLID OR LIQUID CHEMICAL SPILLS WASTES FROM PAINTS STAINS. SEALANTS. CLUES. LIMES. PESTICIDES.HERBICIDES.WOOD PRESERVATIVES AND SOLVENTS;ASBESTOS /'1( TnT ��'��yyy ---777�� TFlBER$RADIATOR OR ASTES F FLUIDS:FERTILIZERS.VEHICLE/EQUIPMENTIMP"' ROVEMENT �� WASH WATER AND CONCRETE WASHWATER CONCRETE. DETERGEM:OR. ' FLQ4TABLE WASTES:WASTES FROM ANY ENGINE/EQUIPMENT LE WA ER LI MC.l,. OR CHEMICAL DEGREASING;AND SUPER CHLORINATED POTABLE WATER LINE ' FLUSHINGS. DURING CONSTRUCTION, DISPOSAL OF SUCH MATERIALS SHOULD OCCUR IN A . SPECIFIED AND CONTROLLED TEMPORARY AREA ON -- SITE.WITH ..FOR EDWARDS STREET SEPARATED FROM POTENTIAL STORM WATER RUN--OFT. WITFH ULTIMATE DISPOSALIN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL. STATE AND FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS. 2. D A OF CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER OR DISCHARGING BETWEEN E L L I S AVENUE AND INLET DRIVE CONTAMINATED D SOILS VIA SURFACE EROSION, IS PROHIBITED. DEWATE'RINC OF NON-CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER REQUIRES A NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM PERMIT FROM THE RESPECTIVE STATE / REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD. UST OF DRAWINGS SHEET DWU DFSf:RtPDON . .. 1 TITLE SHEET GENERAL NOTES: 2 DETAILS SECTIONS AND CONSMUC110N NOTES 3 .IMPROVEMENTS FOR EDWARDS STREET STA.47+21.56 TO STA. 7+00.00 1 ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST EDITION OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS `T 4 IMPROVEMENTS FOR EDWARDS STREET STA.57 A 66+34.60 FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTIOK AND SUPPLEMENTS THERETO (APWA/AGC. GREEN5 IMPROVEMENTS FOR TALBERT AVENUE STA.10+00.00 TO 15+00.00 LESS Ifl ' BOOK)UN SPECCALLY NOTED OTHERWLSE �c^ INTERSECTION ENLARGEMENT- EDWARDS STREET G TALBERT AVENUE 2 ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE CRY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH STANDARD PLANS,THEDIVISION4.� A AVE SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN LANDSCAPE STANDARD PLANS.THE WATER DIVISION STANDARD PLANS AND CITY ri t;ITRAFFIC SIGNAL UHERCONNECT PINY ORDINANCES. TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODOTCRON PLAN FOR EDWARDS ST.AT ELLIS AVE. 3 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AT 536-5431 AT LEAST1I 48 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY WORK. INSPECTION HOURS ARE BETWEEN 7:00 A.M. -EDINGER S' Io AYE TRAFFIC SIGNAL YODIFICTION PLAN F IN OR EDWARDS ST.AT TALBERT AVE. AND 4'00 P.M. MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY. EXCLUDING HOLIDAYS NEA $ Z AVE✓� "'1 LECET'LD: 4 ALL WORK WITHIN PUBLIC IC W OF WAY OR EASEMENTS REQUIRES THAT A PERMIT BE N OBTAINED FROM THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. ✓n d WARNER Ei VE. T.C. INDICATES TOP OF CURB 5 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ALL TESTING REQUIRED BY THE F.S. INDICATES FINISHED SURFACE L.ER F.L. INDICATES FLOW I-P. INDICATES EDGE OF PAVEMENT PAVEMENT 6 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP A SIGNED SET OF APPROVED PLANS AND A COPY OF THE 405 CONSTRUCTION PERMIT ON THE JOB SITE DURING WORKING OPERATIONS. PROJECT E.G. INDICATES EXISTING GROUND TALBERT ASE INV. INDICATES INVERT . 7 ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CONDITIONS ESTABLISHED BY THE CALIFORNIA 3pp..50 IN p&TR PROPOSED ELEVATION REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD. q A� —31— INDICATES EMSRNG CONTOUR B WORKING HOURS ARE 7-00A.M. TO 6:00 P.M. MONDAY THROUGH SATURDAY. EXCLUDING INDICATES PROPERTY LINE A HOLIDAYS. THESE HOURS MAY BE SUBJECT TO FURTHER LIMITATIONS BY TRAFFIC 94 zA' PP INDICATES POWER POLE CONTROL REQUIREMENTS. �' AVE CUP INOKATES CHAIN UNIX FENCE WY INDICATES WATER METER 9 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL +� YORKTIW AT WV INDICATES WATER VALVE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS. . , O INDICATES MANHOLE l INDICATES IRRIGATION VALVE 10 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE OR REPLACE IN KIND ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS ADAY$ AVE INDICATES TREE DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION INCLUDING. BUT NOT LIMITED TO STREET STRIPING, INDICATES STREET LIGHT LANDSCAPING AND SIGNS. . PACIFIC RJ. AVE O INDICATES UTILITY POLE 11 ALL WORK PERFORMED SHAD.BE GUARANTEED FOR A ONE YEAR PERIOD. a & b INDICATES STREET SIGN - 12 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE DUE PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES TO PROTECT THE UTILITY Ta A x AVE LINES SHOWN AND ANY OTHER LINES NOT OF RECORD OR NOT SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. 7' 13 PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY UNDERGROUND NA 11> AVE SERVICE ALERT TO LOCATE EXISTING UTILITIES. - - OCEAN 14 STANDARD PLANS NO. 100,.SHEETS 1.2 AND 3 ARE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE 7jk7. ANN 15 TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH MAINTENANCE WORK TRAFFIC CONTROL MANUAL. AND THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS. 16 EXISTING OIL FACILITIES AND PIPELINES TO BE REMOVED AND/OR RELOCATED BY OTHERS OR PROTECTED IN PLACE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION OF TKO CONSSTTRRUCTOTNU.TM ANY OIL WHETHER LALATEED imtm WiES o UNKNOWN DISPOSITION VICINITY MAP ARE TO BE COORDINATED WITH JEFF RULON OF P L C LAND COMPANY AT(714) 721-9777 N.T.S. 17 ONE SACK SLURRY BACKFILL SHALL BE USED FOR ALL TRENCH CROSSINGS OF STREETS AND ALL TRENCHES WITHIN ALLEYS. PRIVATE E OMPS NIMICE 70 CONTRACTORS . THE DZMCE AND L000ON OF ANT UPOUN AND UMAY PFYS OR STRCIUM SIMN ON THIS RNI ARE 091411 0 t' 91 A MU=Or ANWISLE IELD005. 10 RE BW Or 0A INONLEDGE 4ElEE A TO E®FC UM ES OWT AS 90N1 W TREY RN6 TIE OONTW=5 RMUR D TO THE DUE PRGUB MART 10500 77 WIECT THE URIBES 9NNN AND NMI DOER U%S OR SIMCIURS 00 SCAN ON ARSE FLAIL . AL OXRR ORS AND StR OMMO1CBO S POFORD4 MIX SCAN ON OR FORFD ID THEY RAM SIML CO OLG THA WERDORE SO RW ALL DIPIDITIS NE FRMW A SUE RARE 10 NORX AND TIE PUBLIC 6 PRDECIED. AL ONfWCTM AND 9RIO00RI=M 9WL O NKY WW TRE'00%ftTpWE SNEN AV NO OI ON REWINS W D[ BASIS OF BEARINGS 1ti MPADSEM a IRA AC TIE SINE a MFOOM LEP40IENt a FOU9A4.ROIGM 4'Co167RLR:'IDN OE BE400 KETEDA ARE MM LFM DE CO(MM OF D7011✓06 s11EET SAETr OtoES. WM NOUN 0N6'Of O67 As SIM OR WRCLL WP R 00-190 IEXRXB R BOP(2FA PADS 37 DAMM 41 PAR N TIE Oi[i a Ob . TNE LTE BRa6DR 9WL IIOf 9E B6YO1r;eE N ANT W i01 1ME 191ORFL70RS NO 91BOO IRCIORS COPIWfO LDIRIIT a ORPIfi 917E a CNi9RNA WM THE'aCOPCOWL SAEtt NO HEADIi IELTMTI06 a DE US OEPAR11E1E a LIBOR OR N'IM DE SLOE'a CJaW L SLPAOLETIT Or FOUNIM M=NT'CONS11 CI101 SUET/OOW. f, ONOMSW RIBIt01 AOELY THV It WALL ASSIAE SOIL AD LDIPIEIE IEYO16BdTlY FOR JOB SRE CON M. .. V"G TIE OAIR OF ow6IRUCICN OF TINS PC=.NA27RNA'SWIM OF ALL PE606 AO FRaEM.TW THIS . RIMU RDIFM SHAG MW CONBIXUM 'NO NOT BE URBED TO MORTAL WO MM H=rA AO DW DE CONTPACTW BENCHMARK O.C.S.B.M. TH-133-70' 9WL Bum FDBRNY ND HOD TIE OWED Am IRE BOMBER RWOECS FROM ANY NO ALL tNBNY.IM W N THE SOWIEAA RARi a THE FrtEnsECCt1511 a tOtDFN1ESi SIRED No EIL6 99MLI T N1EGM N LOMEOTON WM TIE PUSON VILE a WM OR DE MAW,OCOn=FOR UAIL"Nt6NC FROM . TIE 9aRE NmmAE OF TW pA1ER OR THE FNOREOI. AML, CENIER R E OF IM A9 AL 63 91U 60 OF A L3 FART WOM a y . c POM POE INANIR 165015$SET N DE TOP a A CON=X POST ABOUT t RIOf �•. UW7DpRIZED W MES PM USES` MMM TIM DE SIR ET AND 02 W W HIM DUN TIE MM . i; THE DG EDR FROMM WIN PM FULL III H R6PMOM FOR,OR{ISLE RNL U WORM MNLES TOW F$3-31-I19 . ��[.D�T USES a DEY MAn AL OVNTiS TO DE R46 MW E IN MM ATC KIST B E APPM D Bf DIE PREPAgFR 19T0 ICR6DEM OBITON.6Om SSOCUTES OF THOSE nua 'GAIT C1.4 " «1."" r' "` PWU97-090 E-97-642 seFvice oJert REVISIONS REFERENCES APPWYM Br DAY PREPARED ORDER TIE SUPERVISION a: ` sl�T Na 9 f REv. DATE By DFSCRIPDON APPVD u TRAFFIC .. 0� "' STREET YYI<-ICOYLIVY.JY 1 PLANS o EMG SERV DSW DAVID L BACON ` Cat TOLL FFEE �p�� l i - P.T.!L P.E.NO.: AU96 DATE- 2MI" EDWARDS STREET '' 1'VNr4 :. GHSTRUCOMI APPROVED eM 'I G7L�1 r 7L-LI V [..1.•E�.i�7 /'\VLJ VLJL. Fil V V O VLI�1 VIGI V L OF q1� 'L 1•;•;< RICNr-a-wlAr gg� - DRAAN BY: P.M.. 2/27/9 46+39.60 TO 66+34.60 ¢ TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG . - OE9OVED'BY: P.Y. 2h7/9 Ott ENWREFR R08ERT E.EM7®LATT,P.E. m ary Of Oe:i'ARTn�Ji OPT�cQ-A��;. 7 `� CNEO:ED Or. D.B. 2/27 R.C.E.AIM,20921 DATE S id C061RI.CTIOM MOTS AND aANM r ES11W ES EDWARDS TAL$RT NO. DESCRrOON I IDR'AVS TALSW OIIANRrT IetlT OWNM LNT 1 CONST.03Y AZIO.W AD.WTTN SS-1 SEAL COAT 1 1320 Y Ifi 3.360 Y AC- 35 TOR e0 TOR 1320 5 dY 3360 Sf AB- 55 TOM 170 TON 1A COLT.CAW AL.4M'AS.WYIH SS-1 SEAL COAT I 10O.WO 5r AC- 4050 Sr AC- 2.m0 tax 120 TOR _ 10DR3D Y AD- Y AB- '1.(00 70N 320 7O" 80. �. .- B• VY 2 CONST,e'CR0 AND QnM FIX CITY Sm.202 SAGO U 525 If _._._..- .... --.-.-... ..._--. ....... ... - 3 CONST.r THGT fCt 5✓OLWALR PLR CITY Sm.2D7 23.70 Sr3350 sr Rro R/W Rro Rro .. W Ao' b' a' ,` . CONST.10'PtDIAN CARD RR OTT Sm.202 7035 Lr - Lr 2' D' Y' 32• D' 1, 2' 21 D• Y' 32, D' 2- 5 COMT.Y DRG1 PER DETAIL NOCON 2.%O Y - Y TxAe1 teRM=OCA9T TE c' •1 6' CP"ap lm FENCE 6• G' 6 COMST.m"sCH.OHWcv STREET LIGHT.250 WATT.30 TOOT PL'RPPTer.HEIOR.6 FOOT CYST ARM. 17 G - EA /� an 10' ID' 5• 5 70• 10' 3 � 3 yC m' 10' 10' W' 3 — 7 GAMST.r I e•RLDWOOO rCAOIX O 1P - V 1—:J D GMT.ACCESS Rd*PCR C47RANS Sm.OW A-W CASE PO[PLAN D G G 22�5 PIAL To ' p 1 A zr A 1 2 ' 25 Par.f0 i1 WI,r0 ' 2 T 2z 1 2 29 HAx TO 'D — i GMT.DMywir APPROACH PLR OLENA.Sm.PLAIN Mo 3 G 1 G OAnlCITY +�(l DAnICNT OA7LIEM * - DATUrAtT r EX.1r WA 2' iIX a Ar WEER�I' r 4 PROTECT IN PLACE rRotEl r M NACC I L5 CMT.W Ar.P STORH Duel PER CITY Sm.30D t Soe 01040 PM MR) I40 Lr - Lr .. -. ..... ..... ... . .. .. 17 CIMT.PARTWAY CMVUFMR CITY Sm.3U t DETAIL HOCOI 2 G - G TYPICAL SECTION — EDWARD STREET TYPICAL SECTION — EDWARD STREET 127 MEDIAN CURB DETAIL >s COfr,aRD FEET CATCH G50 PER CITY SM.301.LW AV PER PLAT) 2 G _ EA STATION 50-3960 TO STATIC"5W6m STATION 46.3UD r0 STATION W.3NGO 4 NO SCALE !v 2 G - EA STATION G2KSm TO STATION 63K700 STATIC"5q+OOD TO STATION c2K5L0 20 CONST.52912•TWGT CLASS 0 WM RIP 20 CY - CY HO SCALE STATION 63•ODO TO STATION 6&74fO 27 CONST.HEADWALL AT CLIUT PO CALTRANS SID.OK MOD.W/BOTTOI Or rOOTM MR.r BELOW M.Of ID•AO' I EA G NO SCALE a COIST.SANOE LATZR SA/ODLGS 250 LF Lf 23 CONST.RfYLLIlSE PARKWAY aLVW PR OTT'Sm.312 t DETAIL marm I G tA 24 CONST.LOT DRAeI PflR CRY sm.204 Wnc ro5 SPCE-0f.WAM t OPdTE(oN aPPROFm OR COON.) >D Lf V 2r 2r 1r it •LA — '" ' Lcog l—I I � 30 RO10K ODSNG SrRLli 1101E 3 G - GI II-1 I31 REMOVE ODSTDG REDIVOOD REAM Hlo Lr - LP 32 REMOVE✓OR RELOCATE ODSNG TRLLS AS REOIRLD G EA G 33 SAWCIIT t MOVE WSTW.At.PAVOM nsro Sr 5300 Sr 34 SAWC IT t WHOVE LOeSTRG SOEWALR 2GOO Y 505 Y 35 SAWCLIT t ROGVE Emsrm am t aRra SOD LF as Lf awom'ED tOHEPETE 37 REMOVE✓at RELOCATE rom at IDmim Pais OM WYS)AS W"JUD 6 G 6 EA 38 A MYE✓CR CLOUT WSITWG fVr-' 250 U 20 LP 35 AOLST IMSTIG VALVE TO GULE 9 G - G 2' WIDE "Nr DITCH ro ADAST EmsTIG MANHOLE TO au6E 3 G z EA 8 no 3CALIC H =110W t SALVAGE MTAG SIGH S EA - G 42 ADUSr TRAIPG flit.DOE to mm I EA G 43 Amsr wAIFG SGNAL POE r0 GUIDE 2 EA dfAAA REMOVE✓OR CLOUT DRINKCLAIM LOST - EA 2 A5 INSTALL ss MIL DOt®II. 7 EA -/6 WSTA L r SOE DO N MER c CO AlmG m A"msTED RRaGOICCT CAUL I.So If CONST.SPLASH CUM ��- A7 XnOCAT T TO FM BOX TO aL0 UHP TO DRECT"LOW TO M ADAISi 7RAfrG SIOut POLL TO GUM - G 1 AI WAY QLVw 3 ' I I J DRcH I 5 __ SMAH D-0 a PAV9OPT SECTIONS AM WLECT TO CHANGE t ARE TO BE MWW BY R-YN1I TESTS 00 SM,l rOWS CCONEWATIC b. \ I -.. 3 3 O C 6 S'IE�L. z LICAVATION 24.460 C.T. V.36S c.r. 3' E STATION AS SOWN,ON PLANS ° v EV RT 15DO C.Y. z PLAN VIEW NOTE: ABOVE OUANRTSS ARE THE[!WARS ESTMT AM AC FOR POW PLAN VIEW PLXI`OXR MY OVIR{E7CAVAATTNIR. VOLLPIE 5105�OR DOCN9Aa R/W rL. it/11' SmCYNi FeD9H 5W . IL.t T.C. Rr RAP smewAlx r9Bsr1 - b. GRADE TO GUN- - SECTION B — B 6 SECTION C - C 3' WIDE PARKWAY CULVERT 17 n3' WIDE REVERSE PARKWAY CULVERT No SCAB NO SCAI W RW O4r4 S Ace MIP, APPROVED BT DATE PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: � REVISIONS REFERENCES s-Mr Na UTFR OPERATIONS REV. DATE By I DESCRIPTION APPYD TRAFnc \ �'y DETAILS,AILS ,SECTIONS S E CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1 W 2 o TOLL °��";�°S° PE ND: .D.9e `BA`o DATE. EDWAR�D�S� �STREET �� T� 1W 1-80�422-4W %GKT-UCRON APPROVED BT; �� E3 1 LS A Y LET Lr= AND MET I DRL V L �RI(91T-Of-FAY E'ry ��R�rrR�Rr� p[��fy� DRAWN BY: P.N. 1 9e � CII 1 OF rLRYRRK7TON LLF\\AR9 46•39b0 TO 66+3440 � TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG DESIOIED Be P.N. T/98 O77 ENGNEEt,ROBERT L ETGIBLATT.P.E. CITOQD BY: D.B. 1/9D R.m NO:20921 DAIS: �P T T OF PUBLKr WORf.S am"mowl ,fir. ,"WEI -IsMW ,sg�—ssh L= AWm=W"—W- =:,ZMWWM-•�= —- ws MEMEE-5--mmu- sssssssss�� BE -- .vkum SEEM NMM �-E essur4-0-m —---—M IIS m F&W SK, -. M r M=E= — aP w r 1 W, m I.r5 N �W — , m0 an'.m .. - psm Wi fTi� Sm M==F W-W 31 ism-- Awm=m yr 1, �,Qmssm I.AsM S,MM 1; im= Sm EM. Moms. a-SEE SEM-M ors.lk iw BEM -f r �� rJ��o� arm ��=or�rr� �=�� 1w al-aWN,44". 00 m il!P C-NO-11 I I WA 0 M rl M- ME-�MMMMWSW-X-h WIN ILA ---MMF7rT7,j a In PI M .......... ....... 4ME 101111 IS WW' ME. MO IS NOW- Cia-I'M RE 9 s I I I N-Mi M.M MMMRMR�K I-MEM-11 Vw-- W� M-"'u, W '=M "POW Will Mm w, MAU. G ,ram -r-m-iffin, MR-; V� M e-.i REELSFERMSES -p-NU WME M, IN— MR �,Mc -,Ms. EWW" Ile= V _RM-350 aw ME Rm fr IjA Kat W.WiOtilmol miniimirmm �FF-L, -am OMOgmr irjlsgE5R!J! wo Kim( M bq — 0 MO,�11 .1 MO WIR AM NEYMM MEE HEM MHEM -Esam ...... MEM ra r-'Mw rim LE BESM--- mom. MM L 'MEW' c c SM MMM ME ms� of MEMM OEM fv4PROVENENT PLANS TALBEW AVENUE M STATION DWW TO STATION 15400W ;IlrJili(( j MI r GONSTRLCTION NOTES ! ,.. fi �'I ! ,!} rm swwALR • t r'� ti r j 6r z�Ga6r.e•a.Aa Aro arm ru crrr sm.ro oz .. .... - ... j•:;!i;�' Y� of: ,. ! (' / `�a ll Lr i-!'Tnizr R car sm.no.z07 r i ! T !�l a'mcr tQ.uN axe ra ctru on srr.s \r 1T. c A{ r cacuvsr-DTr50M orTm sTRar ualr,zso WATT.x rrroa roor nDr n00/r,G FOOT MAST ARK !;;! , I + ! � S J� �.f •/ / eo--tasr.Aeass wr eu euirAra.- sm.run NV ma tdYF 7 o-t CONST.Lor LEAN mm CITY sm.sm. w v ms va-o-mm a ar/rz Ca NR Amwvw w �' �---R01DK rnsrreG sTArlT Lwrr I l / Q�-RDrOK✓OR RIIOGi[O05TRG TR¢5 AS RCOtxtID O1 OM[RS &—SAW=aWVVrmSTMGMaariR ! 1!�, r ( i % `�--'• 6 „„1 @•r,ronGT R,r,,lrr a .j_.. .p �— &- OTR Tr POOR O rR nmw Pan M arm AS R[a i l I Yj'1 I f' by ®—ADusr=5Tm vALvr ro mm 11/ Irl! �G �Av a35TRf.MWtOlZrVUST t0 sOUX lat Rn+nvr a save¢msTwe sra . l�6 I l 5i. ADAIST COSTING aMIMCLL V LLT a VV"r0 GXAX WARMS SWALE 1— aim .sn SECTION "A-A" SECTION "B-B" y i _'•\ SECTION Te scar I W. i jl %T41 3 'rr�.A '4; 1ri i f z a, •.� / 2 p J — `—a—\� � "1 � I O�` \♦ ,` -- __ � af_..-u'* , 1_ rIA116/V 5 �.1y II ram. mmsy ' -•�ia� a.... .1...�ay ...c•..i��-r<v-nv._.� rt { - �u2 — ;Qj �_- .. �— r l `.4 20 10 0 20 40 .. SCALE IN FEET :�I I inch 20 fL BENCH � ea lII-s o HARK-SEE SFEEr NO.t r c% Undergr01nd Serv?a Alert REVISIONS BARED DNM TK sUPeRHsw OF: SWEET NCL REV. DATE I BY F, ON AVF'VD REV,DALE I BY DESCIUPTI AMEN ^'® by STREET YV�MVEN E 1 PLANS D CAA,TOLL� Aar ASSOCIATES DAVO L BACON. \ 6 m...f9p W.tpy V YtN r.E N0. 40496 DATE:3nT/BB EDWARDS STREET 51 '�00- m��w ��"" nvT9zsec-noly av�,ac nnev-r AraRo.ED er. DRAMN er: I Pm. 3 CRY OF 4�lNi1V('TON BEACH Ip DES1d1ED : . /27 CITY ENGINEER.RD_ BERT E.OCNBIAn,RE CRY OF PuBuc W TWD WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG [NECKED Br:BY D v.".B. 3 2/2T/9 R.C.E NO.:.:jM 20r31 DALE: C.2K5 ' 5t 1/M• S f .'Alsod NOTES ',sIGJI1NG A�STIZfPING Nt1TCs ® RED um F NEW SIGN 'I A SIGH MG AND SMPM SOU L GDERALLY GOWORM TO THE aowDR © EXISTING TO REMAIN MESS NOTED OTHERWISE. ® L1LLF a2m a EDSTDIG SIGN 1 ' , —— —- —— —— —— —— — MR —— —— 8 —-_-! .- K T 0 STiARAN rwrIFFICA C THE Cr O AS r rD1G TRIG } ARTNSM ® W1MTE GARB (>--00 STREET LIGHT(5T.LrJ � n� 100• rx tLNrIGr011 8Fi1EN STANDARD PLANS.dtm itff SPCGIAL PRONS7oM5. TORV R1-REMOOVE CM50pAAVEM1T KAMn M MsSARr. 0 1 _ 0 STR��•PAMENT NAM=SAP LEGENDS 514U CCW0 1 TO GMOIr STANDARD MANS AD AGED d2 -E. a Gant aim a1 £� G SIGDING 5/UUL GLr4•pPN TO Tiff AJtRDNt fN TRANS TRAY_ L NA ur A� (2) �aC6rz SIGN ono rew POST DER CM STD.nax NO.av-0.STREET LIGHT. OR SIGNAL POLE(45 MOTEDI O YELLOW GLRB SIGN SFCLIFIGATIONS.SIGN SRE SNALI.K THE STAMDAIRD S=NOTED IN . N THE SIGN SPEGIFIGATIdS LKESS NOTED 01MMSE OR THE HAM• O3 INSTALL NEW SIGN AND POST PER Grr Sm.PLAN NO 4014-G. TrFt N ou i1P.2 n 1 O4 RE110VE SIGH AND POST 65 NOTED. i . n r� tzDETAIL 22 I ® PAIN STRIPING LEGEND AND ARROWS. INSTALL RAISED PAVEMENT MAIMS. 1 a • - `` 1 It. ..,•.. .. — ...•sv _ O rWAOWING� TON Or CON57=1 0MM.LANE sflJPU/G IN EXISTIR.GGR7O.RAn 6 pl I' O7 SUMAST EI9SrIMG WfLICTM STRPIMG 1171MIN IRERSCCITOM WINED 1 .a BY GROSSWAM AND LINIT LIIES. REHM RAISED PAVEMENT M4WtD:S. TALBERT AVENUE - 1 ' - ":::,,�,_ �.._� —�e,;e,,,.,. Q I+sr4u.MCDUN SIGN NO rosr Msx urr sm.LsaM NO.410. O9 PAINT SM LANE LEGEND PER GTr Sm.PLAN NO 40-L ® PAIR nql LAME ARROWS PER GITr SM.RAM NO.407. . 11 INSTALL GLOSSWAM PER CM Sm.RAN MO.406. Q INsrau.srDP LEGEND.LNT9i tIE,am sla PER Glrr sm.PLAN NO.I03. l 1s0 INSTALL STREET Na1E S1L71 APO Posr PER GlTT sm.HAM NO.40IA-0. ill l III I L..i a 3 R" S DITLL S DEAL t2 9 S AR 9 GN Av PDIVdRD3 r �jS�,,,.A6 YY $ 3 AR 39 9 I 60 EDIT i. • �J""'�v $ .2Dr AL v 3 72 S TXTA[9 Klf.RI.LT LR- ?t TTNR N 6RRPJ 2 >r 101i LIE 3 - - 9 3 LL ZZ $ 4 4@TTF!N LY�1'PJ 2 �LCTLL,s '• �`— LL.1 3 LL v $ S DETLL 9 ... - : '.: .. .-,;�::...., .. .. .. .:.�: ,.:.. 3 LCiLL>9 S LL SO• cAP 100•LEFT naI racl¢r .. - �•TARE no,a"tlsl \•11 DR:, .. . . .. .. . EDWARDS STREET SCALE:>IW 210•LLr r TIM FOCW 47•Gap 4 TTFE TO LA`DT LK 30• b M 3 T AL 22 ja 2?j)MLL V sIL T S LL v S XTAL 22 .. SIR.EWS AK. R IDOCAQI(S..![17)IIR1r S QTLL 26 :. ? _.------- 1 4 3 LL% 9 -4DRALv S G7 TALIRRT' h�, aL►s�Ave. �( h . DWARDS S EET p.oL L1N _ , k 4DM IV% cAU-dwWv Off4"Service Alert REVISIONS CAM WDRR TK SUPOMSM OF: L P� 1 pL /Gw' /�y� s•�rNa f REV. DALE Dr DESCPoPnpJ APPYp RLY. DATE By DESQUPiION APPVp SSOMTM ~y S AND STICIG7M PL,iil`A F�/IC Cep„ DAND L BACON EDWARDS STREET • �a..,c®�•�o.o. of N0: A0�96 DATE 2n7/IB m�..a. AND ce f"800-422•,4133 APPRDVED BY. '�PT�.v+ 1�1 p��/y DRATM er: P.II, 2n7/9L VII I OI IAMI GTON G>EACI-I 10 DEsiaGED BY: Px 2n7/DI TRAFFID ENGANEDt TYa YYoaIDNC GAYS BEFORE You DIG DNE«ED Br. DAL 2 7:b RGE Nd: RT.E:_DAM- Q DEPA12Tr�T��WORKS TALBERT AVENUE GCN[RAI NOT[& S. TRAIfR:SIGNAL DnDEOWGT GOMST)WTION SHALL CDW M TO STATE Or GALPORMIA STAWARD HAMS AND SKGIPGATIOeb MATED AK?M1 THIS RAM AND TK SKGIAL FROVI5 M. 7RAffAEPZ SIGNAL PLANS 2. un3t TO STREET MPROVEma PWTS rOR commfiOM AMD PROTECTION or PROPOSED SEf PLR V 5 AND fMSTMG PAGQRIES•UTUMS AND PIPIIB¢S. t�NSTRLcnaN Notrss OBISTAU 0 HU DW . m0'SPAGIXG IYPGK I ®MSTALL 2'SGHCDLIE BO PYt COMM AHD 6 PAR 979 TNTSTID SMeIDED BiTIRGOefeGT CANE SToM BOR AND CON E.PP SILD. SCC SHEET MR t"LOCATION AL q MT IG 0 EDIYARDS Si - -. -.. - -- -- -- o O B nlec AK. I) '� s LL m I I I E_ e �z rr B• I I I - - fL115 AV1. i EDWARD5 STREET L _. - - - - - - - - - --- -J SEE TRAM SIGM RAN AN / PER seem ID I Q B I � I I i I ' � V � 3 5S 3 I W.C2+15A9 MWAWS ST. Mr.0434.60 EDWARD5 5T. `r1 I e)TALBERT AM 0 G= G. I p f - _..{.--��-�"�1-may_-��__�y- E _ -- -- -- -- - - - - - I - - - - I - - - - l 1 e• m• m• B• I L - - -- - - - - - - - - J IIET DR. - ML 400 • L$}A-m • c .� Ir 5GAlE IX IEET D CAN 1&A.AO fi P.W. 97-09 Underground Service Alert REVISIONS PREPARED(RIDER THE SUPERVISION Or: �TNOL o REV. DATE BY DESCRIPTON APPW REV. DALE Br DESCRIPTION ALDEN & APPw ssocLaras TRAFFIC SK�'NAL NTBZCONNCT PLAN 8 Cn�TOLL fi1EE DAv10 1 BAca FOR �. �. :12/27M P.E NEL: AO�YBDA,E =,=T,�B EDWARDSSTREET } ^4 APPRDVED Br.DRA1R�BY: PL. MOF�MTCN�q„IFROM ELUS Me TO TALB6ZT AVE ��4GNFD 8Y: 1. a iRAFF1C ENODIEER G DFPARTmnY OP PuBLc VVORICSDAYS BEFORE YW DIG OIECKED BY: DSi. R.CF.NO.: R.T.E:�ATE CON.tal/CTOR 5C11 LE ,067.4/L "A" 01 .aETA/L ",8" UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES 'PHASE - FUNC7'/01/ EQl1E4/CE A01AGRAM L.E AWG C/RC1//T n uaoioa.o toss a tmllrsa ov®n x as a onus«c wx vo.o we cams m..•m•a Y4®qp 90 sR.asaa wem se Dmn M ow n,aVec �s xas RRa a•"O�m•a nwc�ona mau.rt exam Sam m amn[uss,rt,w m PROTE PERMIS9vE Y 02,02P, � Al Ys Y+sm®+ac nm.x Damc a uoawcao uwas LEFT TURN / LEFT TURN 1 1 0 / / / Fo mme.emt a sroiRm W Is m x'NpOO@ 141 '�'x @'Of°i"�°� YEW CLE 4r Pe4),SrR/AN 1 1 OaPPa,06EPB y,x,„e,,,f oxn •a o,a rstrtRasYr rwnl¢m wotsl x Dana a mncso 1 1 RED cA oa a smEnsm room.+M snc n i x mmsnoss 1 I RED nLvo�R m som°�01Da a x uolm or saucnsa maaea soon nwc.aa / O ,X cal- - / - / O AfOVEMEAVT3 PER FUNC7"/ON Y t 'V 02PP6.02EP6 1 1----� O oaRR08,maP / YELLOW (� 0b YELLoW O O m6 IMPORTANT NOTICE FU.VCT/OiV Ty S/GNaT/ON s DA D� sP maPPB,09EPa - �J scrnoq•s.o_•=.r or rr2 covuquwr NmE gEOYR(S•ac ALIJIr ownRc.m„ O W 06,0a .� I ACTUATED SYNC PHASE SYNC PHASE ACTUATED _ ( 0/ aeR Be ssueoMe ecoae COORA/NATED FUNC'T/O.V •oequ,r ro e•civuo OaP,maPPB,maEPBOO FrOo YOYR pG.LEFT 'V `/ VND6RGROUNO SCR VC6 LGRT U O GREEN ,n ,ewc o.-%a oqe rou so c TordL / 2 / 4 YELLOW �- I ® Q OaR.02PPg o O 0/,02A76,m2P,02BPB. GREEN Lei PRo.�SEO o Lo m. .o SEGV/ENCE W/l//CALLS ON ALL PHASES mBPPB,OaEPB FUTURE CURB p 1 ♦SIGNAL OPERATES PROTECTED/PERM;SSNE LEFT TURN PHASING.THE CONTROLLER SHALL NOT CYCLE DIRECTLY FROM O �� OaPP,g,06SA0 SCALE 1"-20 PERMISSNE PHASE 6 TO PHASES 1+6. a 2-SCN 80 PVL,EVP CABLE TO F/RE Srdr/ON V EXISTING CYLINK ANTENNAE 42' 42' .. EX/ST 2'SC//a0 PVC,F 6 PL/R-/9 5,C TO I I ATTENTION _ N V CONTROLER Cda/NEr 0 Gd RFiELO CB I / 5 d4 ��60 TO A,1 T [LEFT TOTAL / 2 2 IVsrT$•C.E 2 u/2(LT) NOTE/2 l 2•C,2.0[C Cd6/NET 0 TALBERT AVENUE '/2 USN3 2 2 2 � /NSTdII 2 a/2C//SNS) � ExiSr 2•C.9 a6 1 NOTE-9 lsERv/CEJ 02 4 4 E.Y/ST 3-SCN so s4/C 416 PR 1/9 S.C. O / ep(SCE Nd NONOLE) \ 2C•a,OCC R Q R /NSTdL[ /2 PR�/9 S/C. o e 3 s 3 -- W -- -- / -_ (@ \ w __ SENSOR SCHELI(/L SENSOR UN? CHANNEL LL'TEVOR Ley V N J 0 i 6 m8's a/ - / /.w/ (4) TOTAL 3 a / /4 COUNTY OF ORANGE_— O _ _ m8 m6; O a2 RGBU COdA/dL CABLE(SSR) / W C/TY O U.VT/.VGTO.V BEACH /NSldLL R34 5/GN 2'(d6 7 06 (09 EVP) �0 N jU a3 / 2-m2 (/) L Al EVP CdaCE(9'20 WiCiRO) / 2 / 4 E.�WARmS ? ~ c2 I Cm6 EVP) a vu 46+39.DOTE /c /_06 .3 / 402(2) CO.YLX//T S/ZE (Ex/sriNG) 3' 3 3't3 _NO_TE // _ EDWARDS w 0 - - - - � - - - - COU TY O RANGE - - E_Z _ NUGrow BEBPe- B1CrCLE PUSH BurroN EPS- EOUISTRIAN PUSH BUTTON - / Ty /-oe TREE 2_�a L/M/T L/NE 9m6 ((2(a.)'92�2 � d I.-VA) 4�06(2) /NSTdL[ 934.Z S/GN NOTE // '/0 / /-08 (/) e O 3 - -- ;�..: - c ' 02P oe 0 3-d)a(4) R W m8P P C2) NOTES THIS SHEET: EX/Sr 2-C,NEw 4OLC O / O Ca E.T/Sr 2-C.NEW"2.ucCJ (-)M_1N0TE3 NUMaER OF LOOPS PER SENSOR 1. TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND HIGHWAY LIGHTING CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO STATE OF CALIFORNIA. DEPARTMENT OF O Rs LUM/NA/RE aY OTHERS TRANSPORTATION, STANDARD PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS (SECTION 86, 1992 EDITION, AND THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON O BEACH STANDARD SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND LIGHTING CONSTRUCTION, 1997 EDITION. 2 ALL SANDBLASTING AND ALL TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION SIGNING, STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS TO BE Coil FuruRE m FURNISHED BY THE CONTRACTOR FINAL SIGNING, STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS TO BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED 04 EVPCdaLE 2C,3•LUC �/aOLE SCHE/UC/LE BY THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH. qJ 3. CONDUCTOR SCHEDULE IS FURNISHED AS AN INSTALLATION GUIDELINE ONLY. IT SHALL BE THE ` (; POLE turd Al ---LU aASWA[AIIWA1T1 D PY/SN Li(/TTON POLE LOCArA7N CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO PROVIDE THE CORRECT CONDUCTORS REQUIRED FOR THE No TYPE NEII✓/r MA MA wAn-e MEN MA PEo Nd POLE W.40 A I a Sr NAME S/19N INTENDED OPERATION. ci 24d4agE 35 5S' s r / [ 4 5V/-T Mds 5P/cS e e T E /MS Ellie ODOO 4. ALL INDUCTIVE LOOP LEADINS SHALL BE TAGGED AS PER PLAN. EACH PAIR OF LOOPS WITHIN A LANE SHALL BE R 2 /A 7' TP/,Y 2 2 W w /a, 5.31 HARED IN SERIES INSIDE THE PULLBOX. NEW DETECTOR LOCATIONS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO SAWCUTTING. coW 3 30 33 / i 4o sP/c5 2 2 W w Ex /NCI 5. ALL LOOP DETECTORS SHALL BE SIX FOOT DIAMETER CIRCULAR TYPE, CENTERED IN LANE, WITH 10' (CLEAR) Lq. 4 /d /D- . 7v-e-r - sP/cs 68184 W,v,v ET /NCI SPACING IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE L 3 24d4,8q .35F 3s / e 40 a SV2-Ta 2WAS 5P/GS a e N N E Y/ /NCI Ellie 0000 6. VEHICLE INDICATIONS SHALL BE 12' PLASTIC TYPE WITH GLASS LENSES. VISORS SHALL BE PLASTIC TYPE I I 2•C,2-OCC 6 24d4da -46' 33 ♦ / 4 E SV'2-T MAS 5P/CIS a 0 NORTH E T /NCI Edq a, a OODO E S AS SNOW 2.3' 7. NEW PULL BOXES SHALL BE $6 PLASTIC LINED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ■ ALL EOV/PMENT NEW UNLESS NOTED(E)• E r/ST/NCI ilE SEE CALTRANS SrD E5,3C. NO PULL BOX SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN 1' OF HANDICAPPED ACCESS RAMP. S/NGLE FACE 9' /3' I /3• /4' E B. ALL.NEW CONDUIT BETWEEN PULL BOXES SHALL BE 2 1/2' UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE ON THE PLANS /3• VAR. PER SPEC Az PROV/5//ONS.rIv x SdS.V dN0 T/M/NCI C/IPCU/TRY ALL NEW CONDUIT SHALL BE SCHEDULE 80 P.V.C. (SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS). ( � ECelESTR/dN.4/SN BUTTON W/lN SPEC/dL S/GN 9. INSTALL 8 PHASE(TO OPERATE AS SHOWN) CALTRANS MODEL 170E TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM CONTROLLER, WITH 2 MOC/NTEO 0 T(SEE SPEC/dL PROV/S/ONS) INTEGRAL COORDINATION TELEMETRY, AND MISCELLANEOUS AUXILIARY EOUIPMENT INCLUDING EMERGENCY I ♦ /.VSrALL RA/.YT/r.Yr CAP ON M/DTENO.V VEHICLE PRE-EMPTION, IN EXISTING TYPE 'P- CABINET WITH MODIFIED TYPE 11 SERVICE (SEE CITY STANDARD SPECIAL PROVISIONS). F m MOUNTED ON TYPE 24d�-0O FOUNDdT/ON 11. AT POLE LOCATIONS 30, ®, 4c,05 INSTALL EMERGENCY VEHICLE PRE-EMPTION SENSOR UNIT(#711) ON a + UT/L/Z/NCI dDdRTER PLATE SIGNAL MAST ARM (SEE CITY STANDARD SPECIAL PROVISIONS). IL 12. CONSTRUCT WHEELCHAIR RAMP PER CITY STD. PLAN NO. 212A. 13. AT POLE LOCATIONS 1Q,Q3, 05 , O7 INSTALL CITY FURNISHED TERMINAL BOXES. I 3 14. EXISTING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PR07ECTTD] IN PLACE ANY DAMAGE INCURRED BY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REPLACED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S co co EXPENSE PER.THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH STANDARD SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND STREET LIGHTING CONSTRUCTION, 1997 EDITION. N OCEMA TRAFFIC ELL/S A t/ENC/E "'�`° REVISIONS REFERENCES V ja EN ,,.� �,,Ess10,/ PREPMMUNXRW °"OF DATE _ MBE DAIS MITI YD i��D J:TES .�...m TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION PLAN yvt � 4 RCE N0. 19417 R Lilt(Cal m]IQ LO p,aR6 mis * � * 3-98 KA�Y HWD 3-98 EDWARDS STREET AT ELLIS AVENUE [fly n>•011t Itm A-CLY IIG IMIf RECOMMENDED as IWL7 YLm7.%u_o"so" aa LLU1�� APIMtDYED CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH EET NO. OF � >Ru1Ic D¢w w 16`N.:¢LS7E DAB DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ' CONDUCTOR SCH '1LE .067-A/L -A Ad& ,OETA/L -Zr RT 'P/7'ASE - FUNCT/ON 6QUE1110E ,0/A6R,4M POLE AWG CIRCUIT T a �v • Ey�� PROTECTED / PERMISSIVE 03 m 02.4,5,4P,4PPS 1 1 - 1 FO YEN/CLE d PELIESTR/d.V LEFT TURN R TURN 1 RED -ry i RED O 48• 8• d/OYEME+VTB PER ft/MC'J/ON 1 4Q w z 02,4,2 BPB - 1 - 1 = p m YELLOW m2 VEdfd PNdSE LIES/6 Yd T/OV 2 5 6 4 YELLOW 02 FC/d/CT/O.V TYPE S DA OP sA O c a 06,6P O 1 O COOR4>1WATE.0 FL/d/CTIOA' ACTr/dTED SYNC 1-N4451F j SYNC ANISE ACTr/dTED coo E o - GREEN m5 O O / GREEN 0 EV TOTAL 1 2 - 3 2a• / m - - YELLOW O R 04P,6 PPB 1 1 W "11/ /+6 2•6 t a ms P w U p • O p 0 6P.6 BPB B 1 1 GREEN �' �Y ]] SP(SCE VAULT SEOf/ENCE W02,5,4 ?N GrLLs ON ALL PHASES �3/!rLdBELEO EGY50 ) ^i• VS/00296) ♦SIGNAL OPERATES PROTECTED/PERMISSIVE LEFT TURN PHASING. THE CONTROLLER SHALL NOT CYCLE DIRECTLY FROM © j m 04 BPB.6 PPB - - - 1 PERMISSIVE PHASE 2 TO PHASES 2+5. -- Cf m Z x V 2-C, (SERVICE) I LANDSCAPE EASEMENT 3-6 s � N TOTAL - - 2 3 /N5TAL1 2-SC//60 PYC•E 2 2 IISNS 2 2 - 2 /2 Ad/R 1/9 SIC TO CONTROLLER 2 G,4 /2(LTG E/SINS) CABINET 0 ELL/5 AVENUE o J 04 _ 4 _ - - - - - - - - NOTE 9 6 SENSOR SCHECX/L 2 w V N 05 - 1 _♦ a 1 2•C.2-6(SIGNAL) O f 2 C,2 OLC SENSOR UN? CNdNNEL LL�TEC719R O 04 1 O TOTAL - S 4 11 Iq NOTE /O O � [ •2 / 2�2(/) PUSHER 10 - 2 - 2 w-- 06 5 -- i7 i9 / 3�2 r2J EVP CA(iLE 3 20 W CRD 1 3 - 4 -- _ 06P .� - - •s / ¢�2(2) CONDUIT SIZE 3' 3- 3' 2-3 '6 / aIF 2m4 r2) BPB= BICYCLE PUSH BUTTON - -0- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOTE /2 (m6 EVA) AET.4 'B Q 0 283's0 206 'e / /-mb t/J) E.OWAR.OS 0 /.F3rdLL R342 S/GN s L/M/T L/NE /06 09 \ /,VSTdLI 934 SIGH - \ r• &/O / 3•m6(2) (02 E 0.5 EVP) NOTE // /tee L/M/T L/NE FUEL Qi FUEL FUEL FLEL --�7-REET b )L TOTES NUM�R OF LOOKS PER SENSOA CdLI DELAY(0,30 SEC.M/N.) NOTE 0 �l NOTE/3 2 m2 04 R 0 02 IT 0 a 5 0 _ .•;' ' (m2 E m5 EVP) . /W 2-C,5dXC.2./O O (FLdSNER) E EVP Cd BLE NOTE /2 .O h /A3-C,2 R/O(FLdSNEAI . � � 2'C.2+0GC E 2-/O J cu E EVP CABLE (FLdSNER) E EVP CABLE q' 83' L/M/T L/NE NOTES THIS SHEET: LANDSCAPE EASEMENT LANDSCAPE EASEMENT 1. TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND HIGHWAY LIGHTING CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO STATE OF CALIFORNIA. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, STANDARD PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS (SECTION 86). 1992 EDITION, AND THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH STANDARD SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND STREET LIGHTING CONSTRUCTION. 1997 EDITION. 2 DETECTOR LOCATIONS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO SAWCUTTING. POLE SC11EAWZE 3. ALL SANDBLASTING AND ALL TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION SIGNING, STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS TO BE POLE Ddrd s4SW.4Z PSJ!Lv SA54dL AKWNr1AS D dY/SN B07MAI AOLE LOCdr/ON /LLUM/.VATE.O FURNISHED BY THE CONTRACTOR. FINAL SIGNING. STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS TO BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED sTREEr NAME sAsv BY THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH. No TYPE //EASNr Aw MA wdn-a YEN Am Aeo Nd AOLE pvdD d B 4. ALL INDUCTIVE LOOP LEADINS SHALL BE TAGGED AS PER PLAN. EACH PAIR OF LOOPS WITHIN A LANE SHALL BE / 3o 33 /5' 400 sAIts 6 EAST /8' r WIRED IN SERIES INSIDE THE PULLBOX. 2 /d /0' Tv-/-r sA/cs 4/6• urN/Eds /s' 7- 5. LOOP DETECTORS SHALL BE SIX FOOT DIAMETER CIRCULAR TYPE. CENTERED IN LANE. WITH 10' (CLEAR) 3 zse4d0 35' 95' /5' 400 sv2 ra 2rAs sP/C5 4 sovrN s sNOwN 25' ra/aa, 0000 SPACING IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE (Z7 17A2d0 35- 20' /5' 400 5V2-7 MA5 2 WEST 45 SNOwv 25' -Tec'—e'w. OOOo 6. VEHICLE INDICATIONS SHALL BE 12' PLASTIC TYPE WITH GLASS LENSES VISORS SHALL BE PLASTIC TYPE 5 RAZW 35- 20• /5- 400 SV'I✓Mds--,-/-CSI le 4.5' Te/O¢rs o000 7. PULL BOXES SHALL BE #6 PLASTIC LINED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 6 vPB 37� /e 4.5' NO PULL BOX SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN 1' OF HANDICAPPED ACCESS RAMP. IN ALL MA5rd.9Af IDLE LOCdTbNS SHALL BE AOTNOLEO YE SEE CALTRd NS STO.ES.3C. B. ALL CONDUIT BETWEEN PULL BOXES SHALL BE 2' UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE ON THE PLANS. AR/OR TO ORAER/NG AOLES. # 45/NG1E FACE ALL CONDUIT SHALL BE SCHEDULE 80 P.V.C. (SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS). a 'PEo PE/SN Bvrrow wirm R62C s/GN ANo T/MI•VG CIRC(//TRY.(SEE SPECIAL PROVS/ON) 9. INSTALL TYPE III-BF SERVICE WITH THE FOLLOWING CIRCUIT BREAKERS, 100 AMP(MAIN), 50 AMP(METERED SIGNALS) 0 10 eD i0 MO(/Nr Ar so•COr/NTEACLOC.ewSE TO S/GNdz ARM 15 AMP(METERED IISNS) AND 30 AMP(UNMETERED LIGHTING).SEE CITY STANDARD SPECIAL PROVISIONS SCALE 11=ZO1 MrNEN V/EWEO FROM ABOVE) 10. INSTALL 8 PHASE (TO OPERATE AS SHOWN) CALTRANS MODEL 170E TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM CONTROLLER, WITH DETECTION AS SHOWN, INTEGRAL COORDINATION TELEMETRY. AND MISCELLANEOUS AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT INCLUDING EMERGENCY VEHICLE PRE-EMPTION, IN A TYPE'P' CABINET(SEE CITY STANDARD SPECIAL PROVISIONS). 11. .AT POLE LOCATIONS Q ® do QS INSTALL EMERGENCY VEHICLE PRE-EMP11ON SENSOR UNIT(#711) ON IMPORTANT NOTICE UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES . SIGNAL.MAST ARM (SEE CITY STANDARD SPECIAL PROVISIONS). CWC ft a,s-.aIN w T owERRuon L WCE REou 1 . 7 .Lur OERnn T Ra uoameo RRrm o mE.wBs TBmim n x o.o o wm.o nae Rlor a x ...BEB „Be ssvcD Selo c RYR Orem s[eOC�®Rs W weesuR t6anO�o pIDR x aeO n'LtasC . .1 .N TO cx V.TC "Be LIO 118 R.R°0 1R1Qaei eRM eI@OOIB RJKMiIT xfRA YfOS W MBK N.eellT RO W eR0 O®Om wweD3 Rrt Ou.�IpleO Rp K OISIDR V OO°OmeO oR1I6 12 [OR Y DIO♦LERT O NUMBER CA(.L INSTALL TYPE I PEDESTRIAN BARRICADE WITH R49 SIGN PER CALTRANS STD. PLAN ES-5F. �.aDCF.cRouwD sm—ce -cBT a m reRD o w�m x um am m w�o+x Rac R OOT drRm x . TOLL Pteee 1—BOO—n22— 33 mtRC1O1 B 40R0 t0 Tu¢E1E IR1WeRReT R49R W RbIICT x°IURt O necwa . Two M —r D—s BEFORE TOII ING. 9i01N RO Rn Ox}MIRE a f941CR�me0 LT x R¢rt RWL R x arR.cRes 13. INSTALL ADVANCE FLASHING BEACON PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN ES-3C & ES-4C. INSTALLATION SHALL INCLUDE W41 SIGN, INCANDESCENT LIGHT AND FLASH CONTROL ASSEMBLY COMPLETE WITH P.E.C. UNIT, ON TYPE 1A STANDARD. 7 INSTALL EMERGENCY VEHICLE PRE-EMPTION SENSOR UNIT(f711) ON TOP OF SIGNAL HEAD (SEE CITY STANDARD SPECIAL PROVISIONS). 1w PREPARED UNDER THE SLPERW9oN OF DATE TRAFFIC SIGNAL PLAN REVISIONS REFERENCES 11&2mDEN TeeE�em YppILSLDrff _ NIUMM DATE M i�Fssoc�na�s YD � RCE N0. 19417 Teue TR.La sRn eIa BTeB.a .�M DRAWN BY s GT 3-9B OIEIXED HWD 3-96 EDWARDS STREET AT TALBERT AVENUE pul eesaue Bc e..-aau Ra n.n �` ^ # ER,.e-- IF RECOMMDIDM 9 -EMT ftl�, � (a °' ��„�m. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SHEET No.�oFfo tRNFC DHOEDI 111=WE nee DATE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS t