Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Conditional Use Permit 78-13 - JAMES McKEIGHEN - 6 Unit Plan
►����' .�Il♦ ++ JAV.r�' M,•w • iiliw Y�`I 1 r 1 : ,. ; Of� l r F, I IX- f cityof Huntington' ' Bach r i P.O. sax Aso CAI»WORMA i OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK October 17, 1973 Mr, James McKeidhen 16771 Green Street SD Huntington Beach, California 92649 Dear Mr. McKeighen: I The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held Monday, October 16, 1978, overruled the decision of the Planning Commission and approved with conditions, Tentative I Tract No. 10414 and Conditional Use Permit No. 78-13. Please contact the Planning Department for further information. Sincerely, Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk r r / A ,„ 00 (� c 0 �.E] LDS PA NUL-- PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015•5 C.C.P,) This space Is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp. STATE Of CALIFORNIA,County of Orange Proof of Publication of 1 am a citizen of the United States and a resident triltltil�ed=lityitr7 �a �` of the County aforesaid; i am over the age of eigh• i:: r' r '�'= '�� Ifr�p�}":�g►k`yi, :�Y•�i� J ��yyL��::yyyy���altfT la i.i'`t,.l rf�t#�6✓�' ��7.7ft!1y�q�ti,'. teen years, and not a party to or interested In theowoe ►o�+i iiac ;'� �'+.�ryt. 'tn�M�4•tro 71tf�:J�t+l��:',�.'. ;t:�t above-entitled matter. F am the ptincipal clerk of r the' printer of the HUNTINGTON BEACH NEWS a wax C s- qY) rye;Is.r r#t*c ... '" r�ir::�tlrje`�t"�;e4�tr{•�;1�u�; newspaper► of general circuiation, printed and pub- you eit:ol trM Vty"0rfi4 i fished at 208 Wain Street in the Citrr of Hunting- "`= " " ` ;` f : `c try !on Beach County of Orange, and which newspaper c�nta`*' asct;� . +,ia �. sir Or. van grin:it+!W'tiir-f,t, . aoeifb(+e; :oS,` Mbrafiji,?this tdt ,irlr}! )+i; has been adjudicated a newspaper of general circu• ctc ; rr;.ao�s "fot;:tlw._a ttr,+b;t tY cation by the Superior Court of the County of Cr- eR`�; E1 h°�° , g State of California, under the date of August n mn e, irk+`=on`; derst,�t_ of tttlan� li x r� 27th, 1937. Case Number A31;-59 that the notice , of which the annexed is a printed co set in " _ '� ` ` ,zZkst+gent; :p►vi�w'+n►•m,-:ket+a�t:±�rt Pad AY ( tYpe not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in i)unttiui''wttll:sti:d .Ltial►lttjp�a?t Us�l�M?-; each regular and entire issue of said newspaper ;mate t--.Ylsa�subi!�+ X::t:.►9t�td`irr�"thy; and not in any supplement thereof on the following r,erit►;xas::sf t�,s ;i?ate=: a + s-' datez, to-vdt: matAtt t>s;!fi r3=wait;w Ar, "*trit•1r_; s»`lt3;•t;pwi pN1`�ftlf.;li�liW171tW,[li�tlt�•i ::r►�,tSirii.'Cr�tlrrlllian;'t{o:ai-S►:�wr+ktt: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . oat. . : in ron:uricttam lNit1� ltta` abawr fi« , .� �orfld..;,d�i:Wttlotft.:••,wit! '.irt6v D! coti•' iidertd at:this.ttmr: ` all In the year 1976 4hi A{t:.3nta�eit+4 �Natrna +r+l,inr�ttro ko: certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that atGreMrriJ"sa{a W*4*4hd -j"Press ��•�j'ta,'t�r'.'.ar,;�119sit.•satA Li r•':i.•� the foregoing is true and correct. Ft+ntter t,ttprM�t;at +�►trr.;4i► pbU�!ne3: ;s�b�►e$ t� 4ilicie �!:i�1p•.��y,'CtKtc,}:�OQtti Mars`"StEt=cG''tK�±ntinrttisn•>rsxi�;:"G��1�f�►; Dated at Huntingtor. Beach, Califcrnia, this. -6th. . �:. �C9tY:'•Qf;-nWi'r1�1G1,nld�:lMt„r+?#�� day of . . . . . . . . . . . . . ac t o be.r ., 19.78 . . . .. ' ;er,`r►r��i,tr..wtrrrr�rr+h�i"'' ,7 ..,• rt r••:. F L•7s. . . • • .�+' • . • . . . . • . . . . Signature PROOF Of PUBLICATION 1 • v% Publiob Oc.LoUr 5, 1978 Prepaid Pon tc ar,ds 51 NCTIC9 Or MLIC XMING ' APPEAL TV CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 78-13 V AND TENTATIVE TRACT P.O. 10414 l •� ,Y !VICE IS HERSEY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the . City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Ii Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington leach, at the hour of 7:30 P. M. , or as soon thereafter as possible , on Monda III .....�....�� ...+ the I filb day of October , 1976 for the , purpose of (It*. c Q^ sL� the City Council 's previous action which upheld the Planning Commission's eeryt��g � C�+rJ fea.aa� u S t �•»:.#' C,'m� -�..� LLea. �j►r.�•� �tlo• ?�'",•,J.� denial of -C-& No. 78-13 and Tentative tract 10414. -eW is a proposal to construct a G unit planned Residential Development. Tentative Tract 10414, a one lot subdivision, is in conjunction with said Conditional Use Permit. . The subject property is located on the north side of Los Patos Drive approximately 254 feet west of Lynn 'street in ar R1 , Low Density Residential District. Negative Declaration No. 78-59 which is in conjunction with the above mentioned applications will also be considered at this time. A legal description is on file in the Plannina Department. ! All interested parsons are invited to attend *Aid heearin6 and express their opinians for or against sold appea', . PU rther inf'orauetion may be obtainod from the Office of the City Clerk . 2000 Main Street, Huntington Both, California 92648 (714) 536_5226 GA-TN CITY OF NrJIlx'I�IG"Ii?N U�CN Mlicy ia NtihezeC�r+crrth Clerk Publish, p fiber as 1978, ..., Prepaid Ppateards �1 110TIC9 OF lr MIC HURING APPEAL TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 78-13 AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 10414 WYTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will ►ae hold by the ,':'ity Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chmber of the Civic Center, Huntington Reach, at the hour of 7:30,. P. M. , or u soon tho reafter as possible, on Monday the 16th day of October ig 78 f`or the put -c►+srpl ditional Ust. Permit No. 78-13 and Tentative Tract No. 10414. a reconsiders ratio f aN�Na'! e.City Council 's previous action #aAupt�Rld t e Commission'"s enial nditional Use Permit No. 78-13 Is a proposal to construct a 6 unit planned Residential Development. Tentative Tract 10414, a one lot subdivision, is in conjuncticn with said Conditional Use Permit. The subject property is located on the north side of Los Patos nrive approximately 254 feet west of Lynn Street in an R1 , Low Density Residential District. Negative Declaration No. 78-59 which is in conjunction with the above mentioned applications will also be considered at this time. A legal description is on file in the Planning Depafrtment. . i All interested persons are invited to attend s&14 hearing and arn"tiers their apinions for or against said appeal '"" • Fur r inforwation eery be obtslmW from thtl �ffiae of the City Clark$ 2000 Fain Street, Nuntington deacho, California 92646 (714) 536-5226 October 2, 1978 CITY Of MV ImmN f amm 11Y: Alicia Ka Wentworth city Clark . . • . S'`�1Z' Tlw VuF-�- ,off-- c i'si1NC7 ANW A ,?Pv ktL To d* W'D l')`tONkL. Lee Rwrl- Oo `78 13 ma Rft T toy044-, `-AV5 it, Pwiom .X*o I J>cwo�Tw4 L-'.s % P*c.T w4 To UPtWLr-> -Tvie ejawAls-61ok's Ct--W14L- (fd*VT-wAMUcA-: '�R�T Mo 79 11 13 X ?Re ir-bs 6iL. -1-6 c,4NSTP4kA- Abo b wN ri- 1 ANA O •t vc-�*L.- I V r ". TajjNpieT� 104,-J� , A off► . '15 pi e-mjuoaTON N D �-�- • T -eusac--c.T- ?Ropm-av to> LX%^A-rc-0 Al ju- Ro;" -5:0106 rIc- I I -- \vEzT Of-- Lqtm )R -spW W TZ , Low T-]�-o 1--4 l2x�- -763 IL IWITO Atppu eAT ON 5 n9 64qTAC;PP4(j Ve I Mr. i Mrs. James MaK igtm CW 78-13 Appaal UO-036•-13 16771 Gram Strut #D TT #1041.4 Appml, livid Poppin Wntington 13rsmch, Calif August 11, 1978 (JH) 16692 Sims St !4 92649 Buntitagtm Beach, Calif 92649 Janet Moody UO-036-27 11.0-036--16 493 Pearce Street Pobert W Crain Stephen B Smith livritjngton 1%bach,, (A]if 6431. Surndxx a Circle 710 Huguarite Ave 92649 Huntbigtxna Beach, Calif COMM Del Mar, CaLi.f 92767 9262..5 Vary Cmwl.tants 110-036-26 13La-036-11 20951 Drookhurst Street Charley R McCmb ictm Wiliam Huntington Daach,. Calif 21851 Newland St i247 16466 H&tbcxnc Lam 92646 Rmtin5ton Saach,, Calif Huntington Reach, Calif 92646 92649 110•-036--25 110-036.41 110-037-30 ibharles R AloCau b D ulial J Now Oaaro+thy R tJd,an a 21851 Newland Street 17141 Lynn. Street P.O. Boot 3396 Space 247 Hu1tingtoti Beach a OLlif San Ysi drm, Cali f liuntingtcn Beach, Calif 92646 92649 92173 110•-036-28 UO--036-22 110-037•-29 Jan Moody et al Bktrdatzel. Engineering Co. Inc Elsa= It IAarster � IU09 S Santa Gaxtruuks Ave 3539 Ppwmixkg Aveiva 1.6761 Gwen Street #A MAttier, Calif San Pe Ca1;E.f 1jwYtytra►-i Wit, Calif ' 92649 90604 90732 r 11.0-036-31 110-036-23 110--037-34 Lkk*krd Iaw"a mmnspw Petmlem ITIC Joan A Hauser 642 S d u ie Brae Set P.O. Hm 5413 2481 F Irvine Avenue t Lne Angeles, Calif Lang F�drtt, Calif Costa Musa, Calif 900s7 soaos 92627 i 110-036--3? 110-036•-17 11.0-037-35 Marvin G Sies Charles Heimnsan e t al Fxs,rn c Rt 1 1112 615 17th Strut 5365 Victoria P1aae Sey Arn. Wash. 98382 92' Cailff Westmi�ter, CaLf.f 92;.48 92683 110-036-35 0-036-18 � 110-037-36 Eileen M Sies 0 P MCLXVV eU C,e=ge M liaerC!x=* W D Didu wwon 6301 Greenleaf Avenue 5691 lief: Avetxte, 35165 Ave B sixittier, Calif Antir� Beach, Calif Yucaipa, Calif 92399 90601 92649 no-d, x-u UO-036--19 UO-037-38 Pabadja Dewxqmant CU Inc mujarls W Q=inx Jervis T Moody 11202 Dellfi:lcwer Ave 396 25th St voet 4641 We Patoet Drive Calif Scut , Calif F�ntai.tt, �'a11ey 92�05 s4alrinyrbat Calif 9►2649 1 z +� % ITY OF HunTln 'GTon Bt0. A ( H DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL RES(JURCES • P. O. BOX 190, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 1714) 536.5211 TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 10414 APPLICANT: James McKeighen 1.6771 Green Street #D Huntington, Beach, California REQUEST: one lot subdivision/6 unit Planned Residential Development 0CATION: North side of Los Patos 254+ west of Lynn Street I DATE OF APPROVAL BY THE CITY COUNCIL: October 1.6, 1978 r IN>)INGS: w 1 . The proposed subdivision of this .90 acre parcel of land zoned RI (which allows 7 units per gross acre) is proposed to be constructed having an allowable density by code and general plan standards . 2 . The General Plan has set Forth provis; ons for :his type of land use as well as setting forth objectives for implementation for this type of housing . I 3 . The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the `:ime the land use designation for low density resi- dential was placed on said property. 4 . The project, as proposed, and conditioned, meets the criteria for "Special Perm .ts" in that , although the project is constrained by limited" area and its configuration , the amenities provided and design furthers the intent of the code and achieves the criteria of the ordinance Code restated as follows : A. The project will promote better living environments : B. The project will provide better land planning techniques with maximum use: of aesthetically pleasing types of architecture, landscaping , site layout and design; C. The project will not- be detrimental to the mental health, welfare, safety, or convenience of the neighborhood and City in general, nor he detrimental or injurious to the value of property or improvements of the neighborhood W th the City in general , and D. The project would he consistent with the objjuctives of planned � development standards in acbi,eving a development adapted to the terrain any: compatible with the surrounding environment, 0 Tentat xract':No. 1041 ';Cciiii flops: 'of:"APproval P3gc 'Two- CQNDTTIONS'"Q ' Ah OVATE: 1 '. 'The ,, tenativs 'map received GctGber 6, 19'78" s1:a11 be the approved a layout. 2 :hos;.Patos ;Aviinue shall 'be 'dedicated and improved "to the ultiiaate • right-of-�way. 3 . The. devploper shall sukimit a 35 year hydraulogy and hydrau7.ic study :and 1.00-year calculations for "the protection of st"ruraures per the Orange County Flood Control District ' s requirements . 4 . The sewer, grater and fare hydrant system shall be subject to City standards. 5. Drainage fo;. the subdivision shall be approved by the Department of Public Works prior to recordation of a final map. This system shall be designed to provide: for siltation and erosion control both during and after construction of the project. 6. No final map shall record until the Phase II portion of the Warner Avenue sewer has been approved for construction by the City Council . Occupancy of any structure shall be prohibited until. said sewer is operative. 7. The design of grading and drainage of the property F'- ,ll he subject to approval of the Department of Public Works and the Department of Building and Corimunity Development. 8. Los Patos Avenue s;iall be improved to the centerline of the street between Lynn and Sims Streets . 9. The sewer and water facil.iti�s shall. be through the Cit• ' s sewer and water systems . I hereby certify that Tentative Tract No. 10414 was approved by the City - Council of the City of Huntington Beach on October 16, 1978 Upon the foregoing findings and conditions of approval . ' ames W. Palin Assistant Planning Director •gc REQUES FOR CITY COUNCIL -TION Submitted by amps W. Palm Department _ Pl��nnirig Data Prepared October 11 ' 1978 Backup Material Attached Yes No Subject Rfi ON,I,ID,F T ON IN PUBLIC HEARING OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0, 78-13 AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 10414 City Administrator's Comments ,..-.� v�Gt`t1 �.---- CITY G C) QIV t3Y Approve as rec �elll AVP� 197 ' 0,l ip - -,per,► ............ DtJ / d Gt'rY ■^�r+ .+.ru.�r r 1.� rr �r�. J Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions: --AU STATEMENT OF ISSUE The City Council granted a reconsideration of Conditional Use Permit No. 78-13 and Tentative Tract 10414 at its September 18 , 1978 meeting, and pursuant to the staff recommendation a new public hearing was scheduled to review subject items at the October 16 , 1978 City Council meeting. i RECOM2•IENDATIOh : Deny Conditional Use Permit 78-13 & Tentative Tract 10414 As stated in my September 12 , 1978 communication to the Council , which is attached herewith, the reconsideration and action by the Council is discretionary . At its September 18 meeting the Council asked if the Planning Department would change the recommendation for approval on the proposed project. As z stated at that time I believe the Planning Depart- ment has to be consistent in its recommendation and that although the project is a desirable project a change it our recommendation could very well set a precedent that could affect future requests for small planned developments which may not be as desirable as the subject matter before you. Therefore, the Planning Department is. not prepared to change its _recommendation_ on•„this .prt,ject because of this precedent that we feel would bo' established and adversely affect staff working on future development of a~similar nature. .....:jOC�h;.whAtdYl�ifi�..i/+a.;.:.... -.. ... .. ... . ...... ... ...._ .... ..... ..� ..... .... ...... . . _ ......«...r. Gar..... ANALYSIS The developer, Mr. McKeighen, has revised his preliminary grading plans for his six unit planned development located on the north-, side of Los Patos between Lynn and Sims stree;:s. This revised grading plan has been checked by the City Grading Engineer as well as the Planning Department and has been found to greatly reduce the impacts of the proposed project upon the surrounding properties . This reduction in grade has been accomplished through the use of easements from subject property easterly to Lynn to accommodate surface drainage rather thzn to drain the total no 3M 0 CUP 78-13 AND TT 1041 Page 2 Site to Los Patos as was originally proposed. This reduced elevation also reduces to approximately 2 feet differential in grade between the proposed project and the surrounding properties which was of great concern when originally reviewed by the Planning Commission as well as the City Council at the time the Council sustained the decision of the Planning Commission for denial on this project. As of this date we have not received any copies from Mr. McKeighen of what we consider to be a bona fide offer fol.- acguisinion of the hold out parcel immediately adjacent to and on the west side of his entry from Los Patos Avenue. However, we have been informed that such copy of a letter is forthcoming . We have also investigated the ownership pattern of the surrounding properties and have found that no land locked parcel would be created by the construction of this proposed project, although the Assessor ' s Map shows a separate parcel immediately north of the proposed project. This separate parcel is at the present time under the same ownership as the parcel immediately east and abutting upon Lynn Street. There- fore, a project could be constructed upon these two parcels with access to Lynn Street without creating a land locked parcel. i i ALTERNATIVE ACTION Overrule the decision of the Planning Commission and approve Conditional Use Permit 78-13 and Tentative Tract 10414 subject to the necessary findings and cond:LLions of approval which will be pre- pared and presented to the City Council at its October 16 , 1978 meeting. Respectfully submitted , � a � James W. Palin Acting Planning Director t/ ATTACHMENTS 1. Original Staff Report 2. Original Council Transmittal 3 . James McKeighen ' s letter 4 . Revised site plan and tentative map received and dated 10/6/78 '0 CITY OF HunTmGTon MAO -1''� DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES t: r P. O. BOX 193. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92f/i4�8 (714) 536.5271 � ey TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council ATTENTION: Floyd G . Belsito, City Administrator FROM: James W. Palin, Acting Planning Director DATE: September 12, 1978 SUBJECT: James McKeighen letter dated September 11, 1978 requesting reconsideration of Conditional Use Permit 78-13 and Tentative Tract 10414 Mr. Belsito has requested that I include supplemental information to the City Council on Mr . Mcheighen ' s request for reconsideration of the City Council action on September 5, 1978 , at which time the City Council sus- tained the decision of the Planning Commission and denied Conditional Use Permit 78-13 and Tentative Tract 10414 for a six unit planned develop-- meat located on the north side of Los Pantos . On September 11 Mr. McKeighen dropped by the Planning Department office and informed me that subsequent to the City Council 'S actions he had discussed his project with a couple of members of the City Council and indicated that there evidently was a misunderstanding of the Council on certain aspects of the development . He requested information , on an approach to get the item back before the City Council and I suSgested that he write a communication to you requesting such reconsideration and to state new facts as to why a re- consideration had merit. In our discussion I indicated that one of the major objections that the Planning Department originally had on this development was t::e massive wall required along the northerly porticn of his property to allow all surface drainage to flow southerly to Los Patos . Mr. McKeighen indicated that he had resolved this drainage problem and that the northerly portion of the property could be lowered through the use of drainage east within existing easements, thereby reducing the impacts of a massive retaining and perimeter wall on abutting properties. I also stated that should the City have to recognize prior lot configuration upon this property that Mr . McKeighen had consolidated. a less desirable project would be constructed through the use of the existing private easements. I also stated that the Planning Department would not oppose a reconsideration by the Council. however , such action is certainly discretionary. .. To date thu staff recommendations on this development have not changed nor 111.11 the staff recommendations change until such time as sufficient documentation has been submitted for review by the department to assure that drainage can properly be accommodated over the existing easements and that the drainage for the property would crown approximately 1/3 of � the depth of the property north of Los Patos to Lessen the impacts of , Page , Z this p bj'ect upon surrounding properties . We also in the pact have -r;-rec#2ired - copies cif bona fide offers for acquisition for consolidation of. or6perty prior to any change in recommendations on developments . ••.w.+al.F.«,.a�SN... ...:n...++u.Aw fry.r '.F..h.rY• Ji ' ctri w:....-...•. i The` staff s original. recommen�ati"ons w ich were""'sus�a�tt�a 'iiy ,the. I�Ta"rn.�ng Commission and subsequently the City Council was for denial of this : Project. However , as previously stated we u;ould not oppose a reconsidera�Eion subject to proper documentation. Should the City Council grant a reconsideration at the September 18 meeting a new public hearing should be scheduled on the Conditional Use permit and Tentative Tract to be heard at some later date, at which time Mr . McKeighen would be required to submit full documentation to the City Council on his proposed project. -spectfully submitted, amen W. Palin Acting Director JWP :j a Attachment : Letter from James McKeighen dated September 11 , 1978 September 11, 1978 Mr. Floyd G. Belsito City Administrator City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 Subject: Conditional Use Permit No. 78-13 Tentative Tract No. 10414 Dear Mr. Belsito: At the suggestion of Mr. James Palin, Acting Planning Director, Z am submitting this request for a reconsideration by the City Council for approval of the above applications. One of the questions that arose in several of the Council members ' minds was that the development might create land locked lots. Please be advised that surveyors parcels No. 25 and No. 26 are owned by the same individual and that immediately opposite parcels 60 and 61 are likewise owned by a single individual , and in fact a home is presently constructed on parcel 61. Over the past months we have worked very diligently in an effort to solve our joint problem as to how to best develop these interior lots. We have successfully solved all the drainage problems through discussions with Mr. Ullrich Stenzel in the Building Department. As the enclosed phut,�graph will show, there is no further develop- ment possible in the westerly direction. There is also no further development possible in the easterly direction due to present litigation involving parcel 34 . On the Los Patos frontage parcel 31 can be purchased for about $85 ,000 which of course only means that the present owner has no desire to sell. Parcel 38 , which is the only other possible direction for development, can not be purchased at any price. In summing up the above, we reel we have made a significant contri- bution to the Planning Department' s problems concerning these interior lots and their development, and as can readily be seen there is simply no direction in which we can acquire additional property. Mr. Belsito Pace Two We therefore most respectfully request that thi3 item be placed can the agenda for reconsideration at the September 18 , 1978 meeting. Please feel free to contact Mr. Palin should any questions arise concerning this matter. Yours very truly, James McKeighen f 110-037-39 CUP 478-13 Appeal. SiUnal Landmark 51.25 i gsaro Tr #10414 -- Aj*eal 17890 Skypark Circle .�I25 Ki:xls Acl �gestxrdritt-et , Calif August 14, 1978 010 Irvine, Calif 92707 92683 110-037-64 L'1.0--037-4U 163-291-65 !%vder'ic k J Sai jam Frank !! CYeen Westfield tl<int igton Beach Co 20551 ritatuoo, Oaks Drive 4621 Loaf Pattie Avanue 17802 Sky Park Circle 7'rabuco Canyon, Calif ikantington Beech, Calif Suite 104 92679 92649 Irvine, Calif 92714 1.10-037-42 UO--037-65 Opp View School District 4+ alckxi 0 Crankite Barry A Case 7972 Wawrnex Avenue 1777 pellflower Blvd 124 E 31st Street tb►ti�rngtm , Calif Beach, Calif Long Beech, Calif 92647 90815 90807 110-037-43 163-292-49 Dept of transportatLan Id whiter Swift 120 So, Spring Street 4771 Im Pause Drive Los Angeles, calif 90052 HuntAxigton di' Calif Attn: Staff Assistant 32649 Design H 110-037--47 163--292--50 EbLert L Dufault SAe Iet�ke 1389 Arrowi Drive 1506E 5th Street Plaaentiap Calif Lmxj Beach, Calif 92670 90902 110-037-60 163-292--51 t1law. It Gripp Sarah 0 Martitxmx et al ' L71.98 Sias Street 209 Saltimare Street Zmungt on Bwcii, Calif ftontington Bastin, Calif 92649 92648 110-037--50 163-292*,31 i.emrd L Wood S1ILow M Starad= 17200 Sim Strut 5891 Leige Drive 10.ts Ungtort Beal, Calif Huntingtm Beachr CAl.i.f 92647 92649 110-037-51 163-292-32 Marlin C Smith Sunset Vista Estates 17202 Sims Street O rtis Oonstxurticn lontington boada, Calif 4952 Warner Avenue 92649 Hunti.ngbm Baa►ch, Calif 92649 110-037-63 163-292-28 Yelvin J Green Smuiet Vista Estates 17212 Sim Street Curtis-Hemamm lwtingtan lkwaht Calif 4952 Warner Ave Suits 301 92649 tntington Beach?r Cslif 92649 r x NOTICE CLERK TO SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 73 1 U if I TO: CITY CLERX'S OFFICE DATE: • ', FROM: PLEASE SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARIN', USING THE ATTACHED LEGAL NOT7.CE FOR THE T DAY OF 1^78. AP's are attached AP' s will follow No AP's Initiated by: Planning Commission Planning, Department Petition * Appeal Other Adoption of Environmental Status (x) � YE11 NO Hafer to �; , Planning Department - Extension f. for additional information. * i% appeal , please transmit e�:act wording to he required in the legal . r PROOF. OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P.) This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, County of Orange Proof of Publication of I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of sigh- _. ,� • ,� y ' teen years, pa and not a party to or interested in the f:M ►�+ "' � 1 Mry{y. ,.t�yyy".'(rf<<: .,t." ,•f'Ifo1:;.LYN above-entitled matter. 1 am tho principal cleric of � ,•.,... ,+ ,. + ;'r the printer of the HUNTINGTON BEACH NEWS, a 1 circulation, printed and b• newspaper of genera c a �;�' � •�_�•• �° •, lisped a c� Street in th City o � ...,•���i�= �`� 1�� • ��► t 208 Mai a ty f Hunting- ' „aa�� +�"'�!!'±_ iq• �+; , r.. � ton Beach County o Oran f Orange, and which newspaper sEiit;lGriN, t: , w�c' has been adjudicated a newspaper of general circa. `� '' ! ''' y`"°`"`• lotion by the Superior Court of the County of Or. ` + " ! ''+ '=` ange, State of California under ,. , the date of August Yt+�a ',;ir�:. ��•;�i;4,1 27th, 1937, Case Number A•5931; that the notice, �" " '' ��dittt ` `�ri�nii•�,�r�ai�fi��°;iii�t ;a�eri�itit�;;'� ''llat of which the annexed Is a printed copy (set in type '��`+�:+ si►�;+;�t .i'' ':,i not smaller than no �"'`j°iR',' '?+' nonpareil), has been published int !++ t' ; =f,►+, �; ::��:'�ie'� •tar�=:fie each regular and entire issue of said newspaper t ``.!fi�/•�.��F:.4�•�`r",T l!YL'iinl�ly!' and r►ot in any supplement thereof ar the following ° � p} prr�r.► dates r, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iCYfl�Nltrtt:4 i•I4{?.i:i4✓• ±-1'1.�'! �t;:t:J'j all in the year 19 ?8 or declare 'liri i certify x { ) under penalty of pedwy that �jtiinil.-sif�':.•Yi, ii . ;ji . the foregoing is truo and correct. d�rioiK tp?fori li I' ', g S C . �:,' tp�ri+�+�k�1�f�NJa�.,,..�;bii�r+p�,4 ttdi `fii� lVtpf;;o��. .Ile r.+`►� ,' :l•xr.,Dated at Huntington Beach, California, this.?5t t,w+►c+�' :'°4.f! day of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..Poe_q e t. 197$. . . . .. : ,t: .►r (. .7�Y. + ` ' -410 . . . . . . . . . . /;'. . e"..C... .``` .!. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i Signature 7 PROOF OF P449LICATION .Lr City of Huntington Beach P.O. sox too CAWFQRM*1A '*M OFFICE Or, THE CITY CLERK September 6, 1973 Councilman John Thomas -19782. 5cenic Bay lane Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 Dear Councilman Thomas : The City Council of. the City of Huntington Beach on September 5, 1978 denied the appeal which you had filed with the Planning Commission's denial of Conditional Use Permit #78-13 and Tentative Tract #10414. This is a. final decision. You are hereby notified that pursuant to proNisions pf Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the State of California you have ninety days from September 5, 1978 to apply to the courts for judicial review. Sincerely yours , Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW/es Paye Three Based upon an analysis of the initial study, the Planning Commission adopted Negative Declaration No. 78-59 . The Planning Commission minutes recording the actions and votes of the Commission are attached for the City Council ' s consideration. The Planning Commission recommends approval of Negative Declaration No. 78-59 . FUNDING SOURCE: Not applicable ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS : Approve Conditional Use Permit N- . 78--13 and ^. entat:ive Tract No. 10414 based upon the following findings -Arid subject to the following con- ditions of approval. FINDINGS: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 78-13/.TENTATIVE TRACT 10414 1. The proposed subdivision of this . 90 acre parcel of land zoned ro osed to be Rl which allows 7 units per gross acre) is p ( P g P � constructed having an allowable density by code and general plan standards . 2 . The Genenal Plan has set forth provis.Lons for this type of land use as well as setting forth objectives for implementation for this type of housing. 3. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time the land use designation for low density residential was placed on said property. 4 . The project, as proposed , and conditioned meets the criteria for "Special Permits" in that although the project is constrained by limited area and its configuration , the amenities provided and design furthers the intent of the code and achieves the criteria of the Ordinance Code restated as follows : A. The project will promote better laving environments; B. The project will provide better land planning techniques with maximum use of aesthetically pleasing types of architecture, landscaping, site layout and design; C. Tile project will noc. be detrimental to the mental health, welfare, safety , or convenience of the neighborhood and City in general , .,or be detrimental or injurious to the value of property or improvements of the neighborhood with the City in general, and D. The project would be consistent with the objectives of planned development standards in achieving a development r:'apted to the terrain and compatible with the surrounding environment. Page Four CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 78-13 1. The site plan received and dated August 21, 1978 shall be the approved layout. 2 . Al: details and amenities of the :development as shown on the site plan submitted for approval shall be constructed within the development such as the tennis coart and swimming pool. 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall submit a €ina :. la•idscape plan for review and approval by the Planning Department and the Department of Public Works . Said landscape plans shall be in conformance with Section 9312 . 16 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code and shall indicate all street hardware including project identification signs , street signs , street lighting, etc . 4 . Natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at the location of clothes dryers , 5. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters , and central heating units. 6 . Low volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. 7 . All building spoils such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other supplies or unusable material. shall be disposed of at an offsite facility equipped to handle them. � 8 . The structures on the property whether attached or detached shall be constructed in compliance with the State acoustical standards set forth for all units that lie within the 60 CNEL contours of the property. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 10414 1 . The tentative map received August 21, 1978 ,hall be the approved layout. 2 . Los Patos Avenue shall be dedicated and improved to the ultimate right-of-way. 3 . The developer shall submit a 35 year hydraulogy and hydraulic study and 100--year calculations for the protection of structures per the Orange County Flood Control District ' s requirements . 4 . The sewer, water and fire hydrant system shall be subject to City standards. 5. Drainage for the subdivision shall be approved by the Department of Public Works prior to recordation of a final map. This system she l.1 be designed to provide for siltation and erosion control both during and after Construction of the project . r Page 5 6. No final map shall record until the Phase II portion of the Warner Avenue sewer has been approved for construction by the City Council. Occupancy of any structure shall be prohibited until said sewer is operative. 7 . The design of grading and drainage of the property shall be subject to approval of the Department of Public Works and the Department of Building and Community Development. 8. Los Patos Avenue shall be improved to the centerline of the street between T,ynn and Sims Streets. 9. The sewer and water facilities shall be through the City' s sewer and water systems. SUPPORTING INFORMATION: 1. Area Map 2. August 11 1978, Staff Report 3. August 1, 1978, -& lanni.ng Commission Minutes 4. Site Plan 5. Tentative Map espectfully submitted, ames W. Palin Acting Planning Director JWP:DE:gc .ram i t ` WARNER --- - -Avc cc iL _El _ 1 ; R i i ,u .4c -- 1 FE P,i i �� �.1 !_ I tZ \ 0 V J- 0 I QS PATtZS �,..►;...;:tc+�. AVE 2� 1 l Drange County . C IN FEC' �` I �.y.r..�.r r�.....�.....•.a,•.r..�s �.....�r...a....w.wr.•�.w w�.w.•+...n.+.•...r.r..earw..��t�.....+-�r�..++r�.s1 S�•v. .....r.r+.+++.�.r�i � 1 't'E1? i I VE TRACT NO. 1043.4 CU-NDI T 13NAL USE PERMIT 110. 78_13 J ; .z � Lim :. F .l •�.�we�,r..r•...+•..+..wnw•.�...�•,�•+wa..�.�.��r�...w�.+ v�r..r.r...r.� ..ww+'1 r hunt ngtorrr b► fi ng rrrent It TO: PlaRni,ng Commission FROM: PI-inning Department DATE: August 1 , 1976 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 78--13 TENTATIVE TRACT 1041 . NEGATIVE DECLARATION 78-59 SUBDIVIDER : James McKeighen DATE: ACCEPTED: June 5 ,1978 16771 Green St #D Huntington Beach, CA MANDATORY PROE'.ESS:NG DATE: ENGINEER: Valley Consultants August 15 , 1978 20951 Brookhurst ZONE: R1 U.w Density Resi- Huntington Beach , CA92646 dentia1 GENE:RA1:, PLAN : LOCA!rION: North side of Los Patos Im Density Residential 2541 + west of Lynn Street REC.U�: one lot subdivision/ EXTSTING USE.- 6 unit P1 anned necidlential. Vacant+ Development. CREAGE: 0 . 90 � DENSITY: 6 . 5 units/:cre 1. 8 SUGGESTED ACTION: Adopt Negative Declaration No. 78-59 and deny Tentative Tract No, 10414 and Conditionai Use Permit No, 78--13 based upon findings stated in section 8 . 0 of ti►a staff report. 2 . 0 GENERAL. INFORMATION: Tentative Tract No. 10.414/Conditional. Use Permit No. 78-13 is a proposed 6 unit planned. residential development located on the north side of Los Patos Avenue , west of Lvnn Street. The proposed site is an assemblage of interior parcels which would have one access paint upon Los Patos Avenue via a 38 foot wide frontage lot . The developer has requested res,i f from the planned development regulations thrrigh the special permit process contained in Article 931 (see attached lettty - 4•rom applicant) . The urea in which a reduction to regulat3�,na has bee; _ . ;heated per-'�-,ains to ac:':ess widths, required. turning radii for vehiQ lcs , minimum dimensions for recreation , area, and reductions in the required ground floor patio area. The applicant bases this request on e ar9wnent that the small, size of the project cannot comply with gulhtions which were promulgated for larger sized planned resWential developments. ! 12........�....,.,....... ....,...,........,.. ..„r.... ..r.....,...r.-.........,.�.... Page Two . CUP 78-13/TT 10414/ND 78--59 The project is a three story townhouse typ3 development with living areas on all three floors. Amenities include a tennis court at,d swinuoing pool to the rear of the complex. 3. 0 ISSUE IDENTIFICATION. The following issues are raised as a result of this project proposal: A. Configuration of project in relation to future development of adjacent parcels . B. Sewers C. Project des-_gn 4 . 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No. 78--59 was posted on June 1, 1978 and as of the ten day posting period, June 12 , 1978 , no comment:; we;-P received. Based on an analysis of the initial study, the staff recommends approval of j Negative Declaration No. 78-59 . 5. 0 SURROUNDING ZONING, LAND USE, AND GENERAL PT N DESIGNATION. The subject property is presently vacant land located within an R1, Low Density Residential Dist ict. The General Plan designation or, the property is low density residential, therefore , the subject proposal is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Designation . Property to the north, west, and east is located :within an R1 ,Low density Residential District and contains vacant land and spor.atic Low Density Residential development. The Bolsa Chica area exists to the south of the subject si .2 within the County of Orange . 6 . 0 STATISTICAL IWORMATION: Item Statistic 6. 1 Number of Units : 6 6 . 2 Area of Project: Gross Acreage. : 0 . 92 ac . Not Area (less st:ct:ts & drives) 0 . 62 ac . 6. 3 Density: 6 . 5 units/acre 6 . 4 Site Coverage : 20 percent Floor Area Number of Units 6 . 5 Unit Type A: 2498 sq. ft. 4 Unit Type B: 1886 sq . f4. 2 Provided Required 6 . 6 Common Open Space 31 224 sq, ft. .1.0 , 000 sq . ft . 6. 7 Private Open Space 21664 2 j 200 Page Three CUP: 78w13/TT 10914/ND 78-59 Provided Required 6'.'g Parkins 21 20 7. 0 SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE: The. Subdivision Committee reviewed the proposes project at their July 6 , 1978 meeting. 7 . 1 CONFIGURATION OF PROJECT III! ::.>:;LATION TO FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF ADJACENT PARCELS : The . proposed project' s fragmented configuration •:s a result of the applicant' s inability to acquire abutting land. This issue was the principle matter of consideration at the Subdivision Committee meeting . Discussion centered on the possible land use impacts approval of this map would have in relation to future development options in the immediate area and as a precedent-setting action for this; type of development in the future. The staff cited c-)ncerns that the project would tend to limit potential for development of the surrounding properties in a desirable configuration, that approval of th - map may inhibit future consolidation of property in the area and that projects with such -mall frontages would increase the number of access points in the vicinity .. his p..'-�iject alone would rto,. preclude development of adjacent parcels . f land but would diminish the capacity of the parcels to be consolidated a P I into larger, more uniform sized wrojects . The staff' s policy in regard to development proposals in the area has been to strongly encourage the consolidation of land to create symmetrical project sites . This approach was successfully achieved in the area north of Warner Avenue in Sunset Heights . The Committee could not reach a cor,census agreement: in regard to the degree of possible impacts this project may pose. In view of the size of the 'project area there was not total agreement that the arguments discussed in section would be precedent setting or that significant a problem -to the area . The Committee requested the staff to provide thew.:- analysis of the issue as a basis for a recommendation to the Planning Commission. • 7 . 2 SEWERS: The . applicant was informed that sewer hookupscould not take place until the Phase 11 portion .o.f the relief sewer on Warner Avenue has boon completed. The Department of Public Works estimates that a minimum. of 12 months or longer will be necessary to provide sewer service br.caupe of economic' constraint, in the Country Sanitation District ' s program. The District and Department of Public Works is Ourrently , discussing timing and cos.ty 'of the sewer development in this rea. . At this time a deflhite forerdsiG an' to when 6 aew+er would . be : .operative Is not available, Page Four CUP 78--13/TT 10414/ND 78--59 If the Planning Commission desires to approve the project, a condition Of approval will be drafted requiring that no final map shall record until the Warner Avenue Phase II Relief Sewer is approved or an alternative sewer system acceptable in design to both the City and the Orange County Sanitation District is approved. 7 . 3 PROJECT DESIGN: In view of the size, configuration of the project, and amenities provided , the Subdivision Committee concurs that the project merits consideration un-ler the "special permit" procedure. Under the special permit provisions of the Ordinance Code, the Planning Commission m&y apprcve reductions from minimum regulations provided thz-.t (a) the project will promote better living environments, (b) the project will provide better land planning techniques with maximum use of aesthetically pleasing types of architecture landscaping site layout and design, (c) the project will not be detrimental to the general health, welfare, safety and convenience of the neighborhood and City in general nor detrimental or injurious to the value of property or improvements of the neighborhood or of the City in general, (d) the project would be consistent with objectives of planned development standards in achieving a development adapted to the terrain and compatible with the surrounding environment. It was the concensus of the Committee that the design of the development adheres to these criteria and is therefore justifiable. Access to the project via a 20 foot drive does not meet Fire Code i standards. If the Planning Commission wishes to approve the project , an acceptable alternative to meeting the code would be to require the Homeowners Association to post and enforce no parking along the proposed drive area . if the Planning Commission desires to approve the project, a condition of approval reflecting this alternative will be drafted . Grading of the property was discussed. In order to drain toward Los Patos Avenue, raising: the property from the north mus4% be accomplished. A resulting retaining wall. of approximately five -Zeet would then be necessary around the northerly perimeter of the property. This impact was not a substantial issue in view of the amount of vacant land sur- rounding the property, however , the staff believes the developer :7hould further demonstrate that the relationship of this g::ade differential would not be detrimental to adjacent properties . This cuuld be accomplished through the use of cross sections and plotting of adjacent parcel elevations. 8 . 0 RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends adoption of. Negative Declaration No. 78. 39 and den..al of Tentative Tract 10414 and Conditional Use Permit: No. 78-13 },aced upon the following findings: ,• ! 0 0 Page Five CUP .78r-13/TT 10414/ND 78'-59 " . .1. The. location, .site , layout, and design of the proposed use is not conducive to properly adapting the proposed structures to streets , driveways , and adjacent property, 2. : Approval and design of the development would inhibit development of adjacent parcels of land in symmetrical configurations . If "the Planning Commission is desirous of approving the project, the staff recommends a crittinuance to the August 15, 1978 regular meeting to develop appropri,a,.--n conditions of approval . Concurrence from the applicant would not be necessary. rJP E:gc �LA'TfACHMENTS: 1. Are4 Map 2. Initial Study/Negative Declaration 3. Applicant' s Letter requesting Special Permit 4 . July 6. 1978 Subdivision Committee Minutes 5. ' Special Permit Provision ' 6. Criteria for denial of CUP' s 7. Existing Lot Configuration Map 8• Ter►zative Nap • 'Site Plan Floor Plan ,,.r,/'Y.1•M• �y••'w�•♦G.�,• (/•'Mr.�.M,���'M.MM.M�,IRMI .�1 ZLLJ ( tt ;f y,•� LA L;nt.trJ,; YIt 1Y i'! ALIiONC :z C: r— y u SANDIIA I.f.f._ 'T c yru ST LI M Its j,—L CO cn w o _{ �L .� i} lr ' LrN?J 5T 7-1 r--. { i GREEN 5 L;4 do �+... i tLZt'�1 DOl_SA CHICA St VOOF . imnTin. . , B DEPARTMENT'OF PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOORCE :..i • 11. U. HOX 199, 11UN'IINGION lilAC11, =.Ifourjit, 926413 S71/11 5311'.1211 TQ: Dave Eadie, Senior Planner. FROM: Environmental Resources Section DATE: June 13 , 1978 SUBJECT: NEGA`I'I%rE DECLARATION 78-59 (TT 10,114 ) APPLICANT: James McKeighen REQUEST: 6 unit planed residential clove lopianlit LOCATION : North side ot: Los Pat os Avenuo 254 I:L . west: 01 iynn SLi-cr.�. (. Background f *Based on the St-aff 's initial study of this project- a Tontat:ivu Negative Declaration was published in the local newspaper sand post;:.,d in the Office of the City Clerk for a 10-day .public review period er�din' June 12 , 1078 and _ no comments, X _ the attaehea, comments , were received subsequent to the posting period. Reecmmendation the Eavironmental Resources .Section roc�omincn s ttt�at the I'1<<;11111a4 Commission approve Negative Declaration No. 78_-59 f iildilir ch:;t the proposed project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment . MitLiation Measures The attached Init•iclating lnvasut:c s Will reduce p(1Loil1 1 .11 c�il�r i.i c►lllil, :lt .t l effects resulting from tho project and are 1:eC01111il ?t ded .as collc3l.t: i.t:til:: of approval . Rest►ect;fully -Libmittot`! , J 4 mas It , Ba rnOs ssi'stant. Planner J t B/S' 1I Cnv ent�i ironm oi r���! C11-Y OF HUN f1NG1 ON BEACH c« wnaY.ccwaAcn !'u�;l C,llfire f1;�x 100 1-1utilinytran Beath, G�litornia g2G�8 TO ' James Barnes , Environmental Resources Section FROM: Environmental Council DATE: June 27 , 1978 SUBJECT: Negative Declaration 78-59 The Environmental Council .reconunends that a focused EIR btu done on this tentative tract to cover services , I ReQrlectfully submitted, Irwin llaydoc7 Chairman IH:CM: s i i 4* S NDARD MITIGATING MEASURES . -1• Natural gas and 220'V electrical shall be stubbed in at the location of clothes dryers . _,X2. . Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking Facilities, water heaters , and central heating units. 3. tow volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. -t—IC-4 . All building spoils , such as unusable lumber. , wire , pine, and other surplus or unusable material , shall be disposed of at an offaite facility equipped to handle them. 5. . Double-stress windows shall be installed within the units facing onto the adjacent arterial highway. 6. A setback shall be provided from the ultimate right•- oT-way of the- adjacent arterial highway to the living quarters of the units facing such highway unless shielded by a wall, berm, etc. , a minimum of six (6) feet in height .for noise attenuation. -47. The structures on the subject property, whether attached or detached, shall be constructed in compliance with the state acoustical standards set forth for all writs that lie within the 60 CNEL contours of the property. 8 . A chemical analysis , as well as. tests for physical properties of the soil on the subject property, sh all. be submitted to the City for review prior to the issuance of building permits . 9 . If outside lighting is included on site high pressure soditun vapor lamps shall be used to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent areas and for energy savings . �_10'. If foil-type insulation is to be used a fire retardant type shall be installed as approved by the Building Department. 11 . A detailed soils and geologic analysis shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer. . . This analysis shall include on- site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provido detailed recommendations regarding grading, fill properties , foundations , retaining walls , streets and utilities . Sol ' 71EN;'T, rtrrORMAz ION POR,4 .t. 1 FOR. CITY uSE ONLY t � Date .. �.'?Lc"} !tece ived : Jo 2 '_,r:•tI: ori ,�: Project tt I11.11111) .,r : f i}7, '78- S' , jt� / ! c�(;`'�•'�.� •� "1" � __ , l ''J.4. Dep. rt--sent or Origin I r•t t rJ Cr �• "t �••� - other T.lw1_ ica `ion __ Jrt•_..? 1_s.L. _ '► or Permit: ; ilmd►ers : '�•.'� t•:)Iuolt�' ! I I NOT-* , ,)� r1 h r + r'lilt1J13 Jl(1 �'1RCl j:.r1t 11'On111E?ilt:iil Resources •• • �.il t'i:=: a71'Y c`! C�/'''�'t'Iltl:Rt:l.rltl +1.'; l:t) l!llet:h(:� t? sl.(111ificant: enviran-" :lc .,;:frc ,_ nt-e,• r�"'t17_t: f'r�)m t110 p170PCsrcl ()rojeCt, t:hc following must: `;u;7i�l.i.c`cl . t't��l,:; referred to below, may be vie• , .I �,t: tl}r: C:i.t+, n1' jtulltin .�toll I�t�ach Ut:jpc tment of Planning ;J1tl k::.V1 L"C!Iifi:C.-Iit l Ro.,,nu t:es . ` •r}`t"' i11iC1 "i'.'lt:l(',lt (l'1t.:t�(? itt:tc?ctl plot illnii and submit Ph0t0^ ' � ! �� •��•�..� wctt` :,ti:t •;�cl; 1,rot,cL't:y) t p od t:iti r� � j�,'C) jt'l` ti] t,(J col, 11)�C'_tC+ (jcC rCI'71)� 1C7I1 of the. T'Oj�O�a ro.j.:c: V `r .AC:r To rt:.e IT N`-Tt~vCT10t4 t !tl' pt C'.kt'Ct. ! :; t:(ltlit:i�`1"l: l .tl (`t' .:1(�U( .1"1;11 cjl.��(' a coll;j!lete •'�(•t• jj�► It)!1 �� } .ir:l; lt':. t:. l.l'. •.tuff [7t11`.'1• I)t'!'1_lltt!Ilt;. it11't.�J::a.1t:i.nt� i Jlcl t:•.i i,t�; 11l1t. rlct i.mi. c)[1 to c,}lcther it is neighborhoo(l, ,• �a 1► }•;��; ic�cl;! ! .ly t�L'i(:rtt:Ctl, ,ctelare fo0tagf� of sines areas �tJ,,� ) , t:.t nt.t l:►�cl r,;ll�I.ctytnc�lt: por s}1i. .t't: , ally potentially ::;tr:ttc�:t: ttl:t t'.;•t'i�t 1 n ti7;li t.!l in:ll► l:j(� �tr;r�tl , :�t:C . b. If the project is residential , indicate nurser, types and size of units and associated facilities . c, If the project is institutional, indicate the major function, ' estimated employment per shift and community benefits to be derived from the project , N.A. d . List all types of building materials to lac: used f:or 4c1.1 structures in the project. (Submit detailed elevations if available) I 1. 2 Location of project: • • (Address, nearest street intersections) Lcol; PATOIS 4VE. Ct4aV-T4t "310w 9. 3 Legal Description (Lct, Flock,, Tract). 4 FOR TIOW vF LOT 4 TTUCT 86 3'7), :F 1. 4 Project land area (acres) * 0 Number of parking spaces ~) 1. 5 ' Square feet of building area fo 000 tturd%c-r of floor:, 1. 6 What is the percent and coverage proposed by tho project for; a, Building /C> ~ b. Paving °v c. Existing landscaping ye I ' d. tiew landscaping CpCp °n -z_ /r \J.4ILWL.Ilia L.LVJI LitlliJ.L�: a.aa a .>r•.aaa..raa.� w.vt w� .... _. _ _ _ ..` .. L11ND USE. ELE•'-XNT USE ZONING GENE'RAL PLAINT resent ., VACANT� roposed _ I en 4 L4 _. ( f%.;PI .ICI 1 IQ L. 1 0) LoTrw Low I Surrounding " north VQGa#.I T Surrounding VdG4tkJ '� �„', � ►� ) south lurrounding east e E-SIPF—NT14L Surrounding i west51 �h!'�'1►Q C f !1 I 1. 8 What will be the maximum occupancy of all structures proposed , within the project? T4ie i Y o o) f trE5bQ i 1. 9 List other public agencies having jurisdiction by law in approval , authorization, certizieati.on or issuance of a permit for t:zis project: 0 O.C . Flood Control District Q State Division ci O.C. Sanitation District U Cores of L1•.:fit�cy::�; U.C. Air Pollution 1:ontrol 21City Council District i'l��nninc,� �orlcais�:.or. Cali Fc�rni�a Coast4 S.c�nc Conservation Commission D Board of Zoning 0 California Regional water El Design Roview Board Quality Control Board Other: Local Agency Formation Commi;�s i or. �,... if the project ccommerc.Lal , industrial , I residential wha .. , is the: roadway distance in miles From the project to the nearest : a . Shopping Center _V9 ±' I b . Freeway exit '3 M [ L � C. Elementary School. (refer to Recreation Areas Map) I{) LC �;. Public park (refer to Recreation Areas Map) 014F, MI e. Scenic Highway (refer to Recreation Paths , Corridors , and Areas Clap) . Q Existing Environmental Set tine of Proposed Project: 2 . 1 Seismic : a . Ilhat is the distance from the project to the nearest fault line (refer to Fault Map) ? �J2, M ! �.•� b . Is the proiect site within a designated earthquake hazard area ( refer to Earthquake Hazard Special Study ;Gone Map) ': 2 . 2 Drainage and Flood Control. : a. Please describe specifically the volume of drainage and how t ari.11 be accommodated : b. Is the project within a i lood hazard area? Or natural flood plain? L,�, (refer to Flood Plains lood hazard Area Maps) c. ;-.'hat is they di1,; t ic- r e from the project to the nearest flood channel? (refer to Flood Control. channels Map) -2t-�.v<a. d . What is the distance from the project: to the neare:se shoreline? ZO' _-PA(LeSpf- 2. 3 Tolog r a h : a . Does the project site exhibit excessive slope? (refer to Topography : Slope Asap) _ �JQ . b. What is the distance from the project to the nearest bluff? (refer to Principal Vistas and Features Map) _............_V.as ,.._ �...... ........� U. 11hat is the ranqu and of the property as it: now exists? - 4- 1w� 2 . 4 Land Form: a. Is the property presently graded? hlc� b. Indicate the gross cubic yards of grading propo;iet-1 ")moo G`�1 the acres of land to be graded o, !14a , she arloun;: or earth to be transported on the site and the amount of earth to be transported c. What will be the maximum height and gradb of cut or Lill after grading is completed? I - T.- d. Is the surrounding area graded? If so, howt: i.l i t. affect subject property? 2 . 5 Soils : I a. Type of soil on the proje-t site? 5AWOY 5oiL. h. Are there any Peat and/or Organic Soils on the site? (refer to Peat and organic Soils Map) c. Does the site exhibit moderate— to hitch exPansivc s0i la'? �. q_ (refer to Expensive Soil Distribution Map) 2. 6 Geolo is �S Y a, is the site within a higli ris}. geologic problem area:' (refer to Geotechnical Lard Use Capability 'Map) b. Is the site within an area which has and complex pattern of land subsiclenc:(:rs ____�,5�;► -- (rei;:� :� Land Subsidence Map) . E2. 7 Historic/Archaeological: a Could :here possibly be any o;3jects oL or archaeological significance on the site? if :>0, describe (refer to Archaeolociical Si.t:cr , :► :.�40=•�... �; ';1 '-•*• sites and Principal Vista:: , nc! Fgat:u)'er, Flttr�5) NQ . �5� �3 y,,Udl.i fe/Vege tat ion: s a lace to feed , nest a. goes any wildlife use the site for p or rest: If so, please list: b. Will any of this wildlife be displaced by the proposed project? N?C:) If so , how? c. Indicate the extent, size and species of plant life per- sentl.y existing on the site . wm 15. d. Indicate the location and area tin acres or square feet) and type of plant life to be removed as a result of the project . Include number type and size of. trees to be re- moved . V P 2. 9 water Q i C, . Does any portion of the project abut or encroach on beaches , estuarics , bays , tidelands , or inland water areas? b. Describe how the project will effect any body of water . A 2 . 10 Air Qualm a . If the project is industrial , describe and list air pol- lution sources and quantity and types of pollutants emitted as a result of the project. b. List any Air Pollution Control District equipment ,required. W, 4& C -3 2, l� Noise : a. Describe any adjacent.: off-site noise soitrces industry , freeways) . Y ::. What noise will be produced by the project? 1.11' i.Wc.i Ia!, tc , please give noise levels in decibel. moan-uremcnt and t.y;:: c•;..t time distribution when noise will be produced. M©atte c. How will noise produced by the project compare aith noise levels? 5A P4 LeVSL.. 2 . 12 Traffic : a. Indicate the p.cesent traffic volumci on arterials and CIcicied trips per day from the, project. 7 1:; r.'Wr b. What is the existing speed limit at the proj e-:t location? IP, 1M . ?. N . c:. Indicate points of egress and :ingre:;s to tho F,.oiuct . 3. 0 Public Suryires and F'ac:il.i ties : 3. 1 Water: a . Will the project require instaila'41- ion or ,a : new water mains? b. Attach a map showiny the service area, anc. lo- cation of ' new lines . C. Pl#ansV estimate the daily volvino in flalxons- rrr:u .rcc ,.o serve the project . 4%4%L �7aA -7- , i I S ewe r: ' a , wi 11 the pz.oject require i.nstall.atlon or rep?acem nt of: new sewer mains? V v�.►� ' ►�u.••��f �G • fii L�`�i � w� 1�;� F �. �c. 4 ta-•���.�c�tic / �,.� fit- ��, i .Lla ? ) Attach a map showing the :sorvice areal size and -location ' Of riew lines . c. Discuss the capacity required for the project and how this relates to existing effluent volumes within tho systom. Tit Co rac-iT� P'Eivus!" F" "4e, F J"' Ica A t: voLvrnC-5 WtT.14-W T 4 6 VrS; 'rCM . 3. 3 Utility Lines : z . Indicate length and type of new of•£sito transmission and distributlon facilities required to serve project. b, no aliy overhead electrical f)icil.i.tics require relocation'.- 00. if so, plea.tic describe facilir.i.`s . c. Do n•:istiny lines have to be increased in number ar site for project?_,L40 if so, please describe how. 3. 4 Solid Waste a. Describe t:hc type and amount (pourds/d,ay) of solid wart o generated by the project. 1'Ype e. 13M ~ 7l r ...... ,.Pounds/Day A100 r�''p4��,J„��� �, 3. 5 Education : a, For residential projects, note primary and secondary school Primary:. _..�...�. ��.»�.�._�I.�-... mat Ala.+�r .,......_.- S e c o n d a-y s... ... ........ t �..... ..Li.t.�.... ?,� r_L ' 3ti'6 P _latton..DU.I Fj� coin *nt: --- ___ a. Wil1 any r.e s icicntial oc�:t�j�rinL:, be di ptr;r.ud h;- thy= i;rc�; •,•; activities? It: not, coo ncL an:rwur qu�:s b. What is the total number of residents to b(_ 3 . 7 Demolition.,- a, will piny improvements be demolished I-W a•eniovet.; :), ;.he If so, answer questions h throuiih d . b. Describe briefly the tyre of bui: incjs or i.m,. demolished by the project. e. List approximate voliune of exported material . i II I d. Indicate the location and the distance 1-o the si.�-e ex.perted material will be dumped. 4 . 0 rlit:i. atinq Measurer : 4 . 1 Are there measures included in the project wil.i.ch ut:;y cc);I sc. ::ve resources (electricity , gas , w&ter or wildl ii:u) describe. �+ vt P,FJ + I aJ -&S u L a "fir or-J ovaP 4 «` Are there measures proposed in tilo c]r_:.iyn o! thc! r0- duce noise pollution tra persons oc upying -prc;juc:t: tf so, please describe. 4 1�`.N�'a`CIRN of owl Anc� not e: t.4rv:.,� s� , 4.'3 Are there nicasures propots-o3 in thu P.-.:oi::. ;: �� :" '.i•:• '.' noise pollAlti.on tO Persons oitt•s "do of the 141-0.j1--Ct ;. l•:.ic.:. � ��::;:...•.i b noise erterated by the project7 if so, p.ica::�: Y 9 describe. � . .3 Are: there measures in the dusign of the project (arch i.tect:ural tr(!afinent: and landscaping) which have keen coordinated with design of the existing conununity to minimize visual effect*? Yr" If: so, ploase describe. • 4 . 5 Are there moasuJ:e n or facilities designed into the project to fiicili tate reaour.ccs recovery (e.g. solar }ieat.i.ng/specia.l insulation etc. ) := 5. 0 Alternativcs : Arc there altdrnaLives to the project which may result in a lesser adverse environmental effect'? F-Ic-, Please explain all � ; ""project alternatives . i Q Additional Information : (regarding questions abevc) . If %(.'cessary attach additi.onal sheets . T. hereby cert.i fy that: the information herein is true and ccurate to the bes t: of my kno;,r l edcJn . t' t77 2't'. Date n n I Minutes , Subdivis Committee i Jule 6 , 1978 Pact'_ 3 TENTATIVE TRACT 10414 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 140. 78-13) Applicant: Jim McKeighen Mr. McKeighen was present at the meeting . Secretary Eadie outlined the proposal for. the Committee ' s in- formation. Project consists of a six unit Planned Residential Development on ?cos Patos . f Jerry Ellstrom noted that a condition of approval would bo that no sewer hookups could take place until the Phase ZI of the relief sewer in warner Avenue has been completed. Ti(:- City estimatr.s a minimum on six to twelve months before this cart re accomplisheci , with the possibility of a longer period of time elapsing . j Dave Eadie pointed out two apparent difficulties wi ;:h the project : 1) the lot: configuration and 2) inability of such a small. project to meet the PRD requirements . The Committer , after discussion , felt that the requirements had been written for much larger p:-o-- jects and could likely be relaxed for the six units under consid- eration. The lot configuration , however , was seen to be a major problem in that it would tend to limit potential for development of the :surrounding properties , prevent future consolidation of property in the area, and increase access points into the total area. Mr. McKeighen reviewed his past_ attempts to consolidate the property, noting that litigation on one of *the surrounding properties and the high cost to acquire the other parcels would make consolidation at this time impossible. The Committee reviewed the proposal in depth. Dave Eadie noted that it is the inclination of the: Planning Depart- ment to oppose the present development and wait for flitury consoli- dation of the area . Ile also suggested that the Planning Commission should review and set basic policy for the rection. At the end of the discussion it was the consensus of the whole Committee that it also would recommend that approach. The map is scheduled for review at the August 1 , 1978 , PlanningI Commission. The applicant was advised to file a special permit requesting relief from the applicable code requirements , with a justification accompanying the request. Site plates and tentative maps should ba submitted ( 30 small , 20 large) for Planning Commis- h sion review. mF,N'I VE TRACT 10248 A ?tican rrattk H.• AYaces 6 Son Bob Young and Mr.� � "`e p r:nt at: the meet"inn. The sub TIct had been c uc:d from t�tc: Plannine� Commission ng of Jul , primarily hr_c�tu_ f ltu_k of quest parking and July 17 , 1970 Dave Eadie City of Huntington Beach Planning Department P.O. Box 190 Huntington Baach, California 92648 Subject: TT 10414/C.U.P. 78-13 Dear Dave : Please consider this my request to the. Planning Commission for a "Special Permit" for the above-referenced project , under the provisions of Article 931. 1 would appreciate it if you would process this request for me, x am requesting relief in the Following areas : 1. A reduction to ~ 24-foot width on the main entrance. Per Section 9312. 14 (,a) the main access way must be 48 feet wide for a 100 foot depth. 2. A hammerhead turnaround instead of a radial turnaround at the end of the driveway as required by Section 9312. 14 (b) . 3. A reduction to 80 foot average minimum dimension for the general recreational area instead of the 100 foot minimum dimension required by Section 9312. 11. 4 . A reduction of fifty percent (50%) in the required ground level patio area for Units A-1 , A-2 , A-31 and A-4 if balconies and sun decks are provided, instead of the ten percent (10%) reduction allowed by Section 9312, 12 (c) . z feel these requests are justified by the unique configura- tion os the lots, the small size of the project (6 units) , and the intent of Article 931 to cover larger sized planned residential developments. sincerelyr a t�UWTiNG i G* pLANtIJtIG , DEPT. James McReighen �• 'I,il/ a!'1:E:1AL YP+ 'i' t',td!!!11lty u►/w�. uCsvutv�rww, �. w aaa�.+ .... .w..a►yw . a.v encourage meets creating an aesthat pleasing appearance,' 411111 enhance the living env onment for the residents of the project, and to facilitate ir.IIov,ILivc architectural design, and adaption of the development to the terrain and SkIrroutici.ing environment. Deviation from the provisions of this article, Frith the c:.cceptican of maximum density, may be granted at the time of approval of the project. Cliricurrently with filing a conditional use permit application, the developer may file ao application for a ►special permit authorizing deviation from the: provisions of this a:ticic, and such application shall be heard concurrently with the conditional use ia?rmit application. The Planning Commission may approve the special permit application i.► whale or in part upon a finding that the proposed development will: (a) prormte better living environmentsi ( >) provide better land planning techniques with maximum use of aesthetically pleasing types of architecture, landscaping, site layout and design; (c) riot be detrimental to the general health, welfare, safety and convenience of the ru:ighborhood or city in general , nor detrimental or injurious to the value of property or iq)rovemc!nLs of thc! treighborhood or of the city in general; and {cl) be consistertit with objectives of planned unit development standards in achieving a development adapted to the terrain and compatible with the surrounding environment. i I I i i I S„c�R,841 4 AFN AC. BY PLANN�„MG COhlCiSSI . The planning Caa+mission oAy deny any application if it fiade any one of the following: (a) .That the proposed use hat a datrimental .effect upon the gener%I health, welfare, safety and convenience of persons residing or working in the neighborhood , or to detrimental to the value of property and improvemontt in the neighborhood; or (b) The proposed use it not contemplated under the Master Plan of Land Use; or (c) The proposed use is not compatible with existing or other proposed uses in the neighborhoods; or (d) The location, site layout, and design of the proposed use does not properly adapt the proposed structures to streets, driveways, and other adjacent structures and uses in a haznwoious meaner; or (e) The combination and relationship of ove proposed use to nnother on a site are not properly integrated; or (f) The access to and parking for the proposed use creates an undue traffic problem; or (g) In the case of a conditional use permit application for a planned residential develop meat, the development does not conform to the provisions contained in Article 931. (1567, 1947 - 6/73) 1 T-N T - 1- M L 05 MrD5 Ave T. T. t 0 IAA 4 LOT F- ONFIGURR+T IOM - SURROUNDING RKR MICU9JECT SITE Minutes : H.B. Planning. Commission Tuesday, August 1 , 1978 Page 9 Dave E,:tdie addressee: the Commission stating that the staff recommended denial based on the location, site layout , and design of the proposed use which is not conducive to properly adapting the proposed structures to streets , driveways, and adjacent property ; and approval and design of the development would inhibit development of adjacent, parcels of land in symmetrical configurations . He stated that if the Commission did approve the applications that the applications be continued to allow staff time to prepare conditions of approval. The public rearing was opened . James Mc ' c Kea. �hen addressed the Commission and briefly} discussed the problems he had encountered with this property . He stated the cost was prohibitive and some of the property was already developed and he was unable to negotiate with some adjacent property owners to consolidate . lie further stated that he had provided more than required amenities for the property . The public hearing was closed. ' _ Commissioner Higgins expressed concern over the effect of the con- figuration on surrounding properties and the precedent that would be established in approving a project of this shape . i Commissioners Bazil and Russell concurred with Commissioner Higgins . I A MOTION WAS MADE BY HIGGINS AND SECONDE''D BY RUSSELL 1O APPROVE NESATIVE DECLAF.ATION 78-59 . VOTE: AYES : Higgins , Russell , Bazi.1 NOES : Stern, Finley, Cohen , Paone ABSENT : None THE MOTION FAILED . Commissioner Stern questioned the Vegativ,e Declaration and die, not feel it was adequately prepared , citing utilitv systems , seismic concerns and standard mitigating measures which were not included • in the Negatil►e Declaration . Commission discussion ensued to the ramifications of the applicant ' s appealing the Tract Map and Conditional Use Permit which would result froi", denial of the Negative Declaration . ON MOTION BY PAONE AND SECOND BY 13AZIL THE COMMISSION VOTED TO RECONSIDER ITS ACTION ON - DENIAL OF NEGATIVE DECLA"nTION NO . 75--59 BY TIIE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES : Higgins , Russell , Finley, Cohen, iiazi 1 , Paonc NOES : Stern ABSENT: None Minutes: H.S. Pl.arming scion Tuesday, August 1, 140P Page 10 ON MOTION BY PRONE AND SECOND BY BAZIL NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 78--59 WAS APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: NOES: Higgins, Russell , Finley, Cohen, Bail , Paone , Stern ABSENT: None ON MOTION BY PAONE AND SECOND BY RUSSEL.L CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 78--13 WAS DENIED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS BY THR FOLLOWING VOTE: 1. The location, site layout, and design of the proposed use is not conducive to properly adapting the proposed structures to streets , driveways, and adjacent property . 2 Approval and design of the development would inhibit develo amc:nt • APP 1 g F 1, of adjacent parcels of land in symmetrical configurations . AYES : Biggins , Russell , Stern , Finley , Cohen , Pa::il , Paone NOES: None ABSENT : None ON MOTION BY PAONE AND SECOND I3Y BAZIL TENTATIVE' TRACT NO . 1041.4 WAS DENIED FOR THE FOLLOWING REP.SONS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE : 1 . The location, site layout: , and design of the proposed use, is riot conducive to properly adapting the proposed structures to streets , driveways , and adjacent property . I 2 . Approval and design of the development would inhibit development of adjacent parcels of land in symmetrical configurations . AYES : Higgins , Russell , Stern , Finley, Colien , Bazil , Paone:.} NOES : None ABSENT : None CONDITIONAL EXCEPTIO14 140. 713-39 — APPEAL APPEAL A icant: Emery Takacs This is request to permit construction of a five ;:oot high wrought iron fence be located within the front: yard setback in lieu of S. 9104 (a) ancl`,� allow said fence to encroach into the twenty-five foot corner cut ofk in lieu of S . 9104 . 1 and 9104-2 . The property is located at 18372 G(zedwin bane . Dave Eadie stated that he ui nothinq to add to the information contained in the staff report:`t The public hearing w,-s opened. Mr. Trujillo# , representing Emery Takacs addres�-ed they Commis, ion and spoke in favor of granting the appeal . lie di.s`cupsed tht-2 pedestrian traffic on the corner lot that cut across the la�:�r�.,� He referred to six letters he had from neighbors who concurred with *• bo request and had no objections . These were presented to the. PlanninCJ-Commission and returned to him. -..� The public hearing was than rlusesd. �' i f + �i tI �L�it�� i Z ,r""i!'+..._'!•_.!!'f�.-� _•�� { # •�I _,�.1 {_� �.!l.��N '•�,_lam, .ia I I t i t .; 1 • i ri 41 - t i • _ ��-.•• .rr _ i �" ..ram'-L�:ivNO.:`�E. F � -•- -- • +w -...• .y_ --a :tea•. ' t -�•.-�'l' -�!f+. .! ►� �.r:r.iS fit.:.�'e.r• ..^L i ifp.At } . ♦ . .J v •s• _r r_•t !•�w�v t�a<rc:.t4 vas[�.•.0-...✓c..� �..0 `S` ..t,f,1 ar[ ._ ttw; •y.,.. �... ya wr.�t f �►.v.: �wN ' y..,q t ••t•a.� . t• f-tt 1t 11 I` t .. Publish August 24, 1978 0"Amir )0:4kpos ec,ards 51 NOTICE Of FMIC MAKING APPEAL TO DENIAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #78-13 AND TENTATIVE TRACT #10414 NOTICE X5 HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the � City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chwbaer of the Civic Center, Wmtington beach, at the hour of _,,,11-�0 F. H. , or as goon thereafter Rae possible, on Tuesday «........ tt`e .,. 51b .» day of _. ea.( nber , 19 78, for the puYpose of considering an appeal to the Planning Ccrrnission's denial of Conditional Use Permit I #78-13 and Tentative 'Tract No. 10414. Conditional Use Pprmit No. 78-13 is a proposal to construct a 6 unit planned residential development. Tentative Tract No. 10414 also pertaining to the same property is a one. lot subdivision. The subject property is located on the north side of Los Patos Drive, approximately 254 feet west of Lynn Street in the R-1 Low Density Residential District. Negative Declaration No. 78-59 relatiq to the proposal will be considered concurrently. A legal description is on file in the Planning Department. i All interested persona~ era invited to attend said hearing and � express their opinions for or against said appeal rt►'urther inforvaation way bae obtaln*d froaa tho Office of the City Clark.= 2000 Main St. , Huntington Beach, CA, (714) 536-5226. � DATID. 8 CITY OF- WIRTIMMU Bp„ H � IY: Alicia H,, Wenrmrth City Clark S, NU ME. TO CLERK TO SCIIEDUI,E PiRILIC IIEARI14G T0: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE DATE: ( p� FROM: ( !► t� ��t� `.✓' �''4� i' PLEASE SCIIEDULE A PUBLTC HEARING USING '1111: NI'TACIIED LEGAL NOTICE FOR THE 1� �.y..-l---1?A'f OF 197rg A s will fallow No AP's i Initiated by: Plinning Conuni.,;Eion _ Planning Uepurtment: Petition * Appeal V_ Other Adopt icon of Environmental Statu:; YES No Refer to �1� Planning Departmetit - 13xtension f 2-7 for additional Information. I, * If a2j)c?t 1 , please transmit cr:,:ac:t Wording ing to hr rctlti i rt•�1 I n t ltr• 1 t �;a t . i, { �-S `'�''AM-t,, -T 70 —t'5 } -t�? J ~,► ,c,,� l,.do , c0'q"`l ,,)Vl ss> ►-n oiJ At.• feAr io� 't-~' jA - ?IV— 1 :s S A PAO Q'cxSA-e... s- -�-r,,u�:. -- A 4p - V,--) r~ PLA4J'J t A T*.s t aWTl '` x..-I p�1 •J (A)17 -C-D -rW--- t-- POIII0 P 60^17 Ls /4 1. -. L 4p T— ' li '�► .� +� �'►Q'' .� vio or •' `\ter 7`r AJ Z'?' City of Huntington Beach P.O. Box Ito CALIFORNIA 92641 aFrtcl: OF 'I'Hl: CITY CLERK f September 6, 1978 I Councilman John Thomas 19782 Scenic Bay Lane Huntington Beach, ra. 92646 Dear Councilman Thomas: The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach on September 5, 1971{ denied the appeal which you had filed with the Planning Conralssion's denial of Conditional Use Permit #78-13 and Tentative Tract #10414. This is a final decision. You are hereby notified 6:-t pursuant to provisions of Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the State of California you have ninety days from September 5, 197E to apply to the courts For, judicial review. Sincerely yours, Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW/es cc: James McYeighen