The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutConditonal use permit 87-44 - McDonnell-Douglas Realty Compa Au1ROrNed it Publrtsh Lf aM 1rr4: -U" 0"0 C _. MWIC" by DOCrae o. 1he S-JOW101 cor+rt AI bron" GownrT. Clburprnie t vmb t A.0 14 081e4 :• 50010mbW 1%1 and A-2031 oated 11 j%ora. IK3 SATE OF CALIFORNIA :�sJ � County of Orange 0-0-a ►mmmo &#..%WV ,.�,. �.......�....� _ _..� .. ..� .r ... JIM .+ N,fie cw�w mow► ...r.. fps op ea emr CWrk Md v 4" I OKA 1�010 eir«rt, tMru lmi rMoR drri/d,W cawwrik rtrPLA atr�aefw+ti WNIL I am a C11111n of t" ► Unitdrd States and ri re-oftnt of �� '" I C tN1NiWiTOM atlaCte Ar"WWK e» CRT CWAe UL. RFc iftft if.-o'County alotesald. I am ovtx the ago of vghl~ "0W-QW U. W*41104fift. CII a dir.eev i;"6pbirw s"a>wW ybars. and no! a pasty to lx inte►el+st9d in ihc. Wow "S ._1WW a co-ed Irai108 0111111194 lTlatt4f I ar" A PrMClr�al Cierk of IhR Oran erg to darn , � (11.'ttial/IE1L C»wa irrwrry L. '0N Coast DAILY PILO' with *hich •s Combined "he Ie1ftAI-2 CW&PXQ �•••-------- f NEWS•PRE,,S. a newspaper of general circulation, oamntc" me ~E►�"VgwT bwm*cdh cav+ar we r+w. pr:nf" and published in the City of Costa Mesa. �KWkPei"�14+Cw+ra C"nty of Oraft-o. Stale of California. +%r j ti►at a w �. cue C."". cd eRun sired. 1."w4t0n NoUC! of Lh I C: 130.t r .' , Mich. CaummL in V14 ow Wd at M am tr►• ;v dWA.1 bow so•7lMw WW -'_ a110de K flat a11161wew.Mr of ab i7rrioro WW ~, to bi -- ►eard rarve 10 !,* ate• 1 of ►OPCn Cole) altached Aere(o is a true and complete �' WD'r mtt 7u1iCh. tidxrrarr coCy, was prin;m+d and publisheM in the Costa Mesa, t<I To.t 10,11111, Newport BeeaCh. Hunts ton B!::. •, Fountain Valle sulul:eT �r►w ltrw ;a �• t0 iota !tar+rrine CORr• , Irvine- the Sauth Ceast commun ties ane Laguna RURO "= °°'w "� of� Q ditiortol us* Parl"11 Beacn issues of said newspaper for o n e, 87- 4,1COMr WOM E`crr- orn 1D•sSnmmmw* ►craw Mir dt.ati�l,+wrntrr-+at CoriSerCUtive went2 tJ wit the mue(sl cf wool Raw*dl•i Ar*LICA)f1. WDOWrn«I n Feb. 4a �.,K r _ . 198_ .._. LrCATr9N: tt rtneatt � caf.ir N dtw Ar.-rya wat .�. t9t�._ rAOFOSA%,, Oa9alrrPP rwild wr ofl6ai Weep if ii Sam of turd Mtwara! •rjw"" it "ary%WOO-! 1 C •r1•WA d~7 bwwT.loin. rarl�rary 0"L in WICASIV, coryrriwtsNl.'#V W wi low ft14 i 1Nr•�� tl� � >rJI Not Q+rVEriTAl VAtuf-rJh+rvmww*+M v*. t^ put 11100001 Ma. $r. M�tt11 N W* *of 1t1 d�ntlll�� e/�rafrlH oR V L C C.argw M CLP Ir.lelci dt•d�/Tf I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the r foregoing is true and correct. Cwt. °"� of �" ALL IMII 1100i1ED PI& SOW era WrWom d N UI'�d Mwl, alyd Executed on Feb. 9 , 198 .�_ Viem +°M+k•, «+ I>. at Costs Mesa, California. ~ , W" rdr+rlett0 1* m wellim!" Ira« •lwt Now a S►9naturrk � �� r-. z up �--� PROOF OF PUI"AT1aM •• Page 8 - Council/Agency Mi^utes - 2/16/68 A mot' on was made by !lays , seconded by Erskine, to relocate t i ftguard head- quarters on the condition that it to ..•eplaced by a strong aiv-hor tenant for Pierside Villa, such as a rr.tjor restaurant. The notion carried sy the fo°- lowinc roll call vote: n AYES: Kelly, Green Erskine , mays �' ' ( {r-' Affyinq NOES : cinley, f4inchell _ ABSENT: 8arini s ter LtY._Cou nc i 1] - 1u1S�i �gl _: .Yt'.�l �.L LAWN G IS INN APP R(N . .: APPEAL o I Ell _Q"L-=.M. _ APPROYED lit �E#QED ._,SE_ 42.9.5- .ED — T.�i APPROVED�:. MCWM11ELL_MLALAEA1,Ty..M The Mayor announced that thk was the day and hour set for a public, hearing to consider appeals filad by the Q y Coync! l_gi_ the��f-tJ IR n - r and the !iNjR- Prooerty Mdrlai Huntlnotan t to the Planning Comma s- sion' s amp*oval of Cor. - _ional Use Permit 87-44lConditionAl Exl:eption 87-i?S! Tentative Parcel Map 87-_,24/Environmental Impact Zeport 87-4. The proposal is to develop mixed use office ccmplex on 16.42 acres of land. Project includes one iz story building , one 8 stony building, two restaurant pads , an ancillary commercial /retail use buildfnq, a parking structure and at grade parking . - % subject property is located apt the northeast corner of ao 1 sa Avenue and Eta ) sa Chi c s Street . I Envirr,irental Impact Rep)rt No. 87-4 analyze. the potAntial ir^rac }s Of the project and identifies appropriate mitigation Treasures ' The Deputy City Clerk announced that all legal requirements for ncti fication, � publication and o%)sting had been mat , and that she had rvicei% gd a letter frn% Lne Huntington Beach Environrrentai Saard dated February l5, She states! that a letter dated February i , 1988 had been received from the City of Nest Catherne O' Hara , Assistant Planner , presented a staff report . Mike Adams , Planni -i5 Director . informed Council they had been provided with copies of a handou : outlining alternate language for one of the conditions of approval . Co,:�ci 'man Mays stated that he I,ad been an e-mployee of McDonnell Douglas for the past ten years and therefor ; he would not participate in discussion, or vote of the issue because of a possible conflict- of Interest . f:?.��._f_�.�'��.�`3'�i_._�l:d.t�'�.__hi 5---;�'•�SA__s�S....thi!_GQ4��_.._k��'.1�__�L��_..t��r4.4'"�.� The Ma'1ar declared the hearing open, Mayor Pro Tem of the City of NestminstLr , appearing cn behalf of the CI ty Counci 1 of the City of Hestminster, stated that: the C1 ty of Hest minste• does not object to the proposed pro"act and that its appeal of the Planni,7g Camrnissia,, s approval of this protect is based on the belief that the $35,O00 proposed traffic improvement in the City of Westminst-er wo;yid not be, adegua:e to effectively mitigate she adverse traffic impact of the project.: He proposed that a joint committee composed of City counci lmembers and staff from both ci ti vs be appointed by oach City Council to study future nee%dfs Of` street and intersections which will be iapacted by the project and future, devela=ent that will occur in both cities and to identify ali ;otontial fund-: j r l � 1 Page 9 - CouncilfAgency Minutes - 2/ 16188 ing sources . He suggested the project be approved based upon a condition that will require payment 7rom McDonnell DOLIglas for traffic mitigation "gsures , based upon the findings from the proposed joint studies , prior to occupancy of the first phase of the oroject. He requested that Condition of Approval No. 13 be revised to read a� Follows : "Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the Phase I eight story office building, McDonnell Douglas shall pay for their reasonable share of the cost for traffic improvements within the pity of Westninister as determined jointly by the titles of Huntington 8ea:h and Westminster based u cn a p joint traffic stvdy . " Beverly Clyde . r r°31n i_ t n�the` H �, i n Ip.r V1 1 �.d Hc!m wn r�?�i� appellant, f� _L{ N�_i.X_ {t�nidt , aiL"_',Za1.. 0_ ► NjpA„�Q s , ith, 1 PniK and �q; Q� ma stat?d their concerns regardin4 traffic !mpact on surrounding streets , particularly Rancho Road and Boi:a E Chica Street. They stated their concern regarding noise and deterioration of air quality due to aaditionai aut mobiles . vp SchVl3g supported the NcDonneli Douglas project . RQsalie Paten t i , Westminster , reviewed a newsletter and survey received through the mail from Senator 9erge!on pertai ,iing to the question "Can C►-ovth be Managed" . MS . Pe-Conti read portions of the article and related it to th'! i ; McDonnei Douglas project P-ktS,{h , reoresenting McCornell Douglas Realty :cirpany, applicant, reviewed the histcry of the number o:` employees at ;he plant and stated �'je project Under discussion would bring the number of emnployees back up to the number employed in the past . He outlined traffic mitigation measures proposed by McDonnell Coughs . He stated that M.-Donnell Douglas at chic time would identify S1C0,00 + n lieu of the S1.5 .C-CC figure for traffic mitigation mea- sures and wcuid be glad to Proceed with that ir-adificatien . ��nn pring �; stated he prepared 'he traffic study for the McConnell Couglar, -)rojec. Z^d t*at al or the intersections had Problems without this prcJect .ind that this project would increase traffic by Less than one percent . He seated that the recorsmerded improvements shouI d be done with or withcut the McDonnell Douglas project . Discussion was held between Mayor Erskine and Mr. Pringle regarding the total number of trips per day generated by the project . There being na one present to spear. further on the .utter and there being no furtner protests filed , either oral or written , the hearing was closed by the Mayor . Discussion was held between Coui,ril and Mr . Adams regarding server capacity, noise ba;j on Sunday , the Transportation System Management Plan and mitigation of traffic on surrounding streets . discussion was held regarding a TrAnspor- tation Sysste.m Management Plan Coordinator, a van system to serve McDonnell Douglas employees , and a joint committee to work together to solve - traffic problems . Councilman Kelly stated his concerns relative to waiting until occupancy of the project before informing McDonnell C:-uglas of theta shire of traffic improvements was too long of a time frame. i Page 10 - Council /Agency Minutes - 2/16/88 Merle Pautsch , representing McDonnell Douglas , stated that first occupancy of Phase I was targeted for June 1989. Following discussion between Council and Charles Smith, Mayor Pro Tea of the City of Westminister, a consensus of opinion was reached that six months was enough time to reach a decision regarding McDonnell Douglas' s fair share of the cost of traffic improvement measures . Mr. Smith urged Council to work jointly with the City of Westminster to acquire state funds for traffic Improvement . Folluwing discussion , a motion was made by Erskine , seconded by Finley. to suitaii the Planning Con-nissiun decision , deny both appeals and approY't Envi- ronmental Impact Report 87-4 , Conditional Exception Variance 87-95. and Tenta- tive Parcel Map 87-424 based on findings and conditions of approval as set forth in RCA dated Febri:ary 16. 1987 , as amended . as follows: U nd i ngs fo ApRrovAl - C9pdttJ_Qr3J �P� t�.�Q�_.flu-��a�s�.►�� tlas>�l ' 1 - ��p t i Q� tVa.LLd�S€�hSL• _R��.�.b 1 . The proposes mixed use project, with conditions of approval and mitiga- tion measures identifies: in E!R 87-4, -ill not have a detrimental effect upon the general heaIto, veifare , safety and convenience of persons residing or working i:i th; neighborhood , nor will it De detrimental t0 t,tie value of property an! irtarovenents in the vicinity. 2. Tree pr000se. 1nixed use oft'ice project which include 65 percent of the gross floor area of :he buiiCings tc be used as corporate office head- ajarters is sonsi stent oith the t-A Zoning ()! strict and the General Plan Lind Use des ; ;nation of General Indu: trial . 3 . rye Fircp.osed �� xed use off'. ;,,, pro' is compatible with existing 3n4 proposed uses in the vicinity 'which include general industrial to the sou,'h , Seal 3eacn Naval Werpons Center to the crest and the Mc0onnell- Couglas Astronautics Facility to the north and east . 4 . The site layout , and design r;f the proposed mixed use office project properly adapts the proposed structures to streets , driveways and other adjacent structures In a harmonious manner. Project entries , deceleration lanes and changes tc "he existing medians in Bois& Chic• Street and Solsa Avenue have been properly designed by a Traffic Engineer In order to ni ! ;gate imp,�cts on the existing circulation system. 5 . The combination, of the proposed uses on the ite, as set forth in Draft Rasolution No . 1387 . are properly integrated on the site. 6 . A_ress to and parking, for the proposed mixed use office project will no' crease undue tr,tf f i c problems . The new traffic signal on Bol sa Avenue a, tn -nain ent-y to the project will encourage employees to uss thi' entrance . The speed rairp on the east side of the parking structure Wilk facilitate orderly ingress and egress from tee parking structure. 7. The granting of Conditional Exception (,Variance) No. 87-95 Wallow for more than. 50 percent of the front yard setback to be used for parking, will be offset by the provision of landscape on the site far in excess Of code requirements , insuring that the project will not be WertAll." d-rtricental to the public health, salute and welfare or injurious to th conforming lard , property or improvements in the ntighborhoW. s Page 11 - Council/Agelicy Minutes - 2/15/81 t' L . Exceptional circu.ostances (the granting of the Use Variance for building heights up to 2SO feet) do not apply generally to property in the sa :e district. 9 . The granting of Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 87-95 Is necessary for the preservation of and enjoyment of iubstantial property rights . 10. The Orange County Sanitation District planned for 71 ,469 gallons of sewsge effluent per day to be generated from this 18.4 acre site. The proposed project is projecreo to generate 110.447 gallons per day; a 54 percent increase a ver that which was planned for. It is understood that this project is utilizing a sswage capacity credit of approximately 38, 978 ,&lions per day from the undeveloped 66 acre McDonnell-DougICs sits located along Springdale Avenue . Ei rid i gk gf AUroya T.IrI ate"�I parca1 87-,2 1 . The proposed sucjivision of 7 parcels for purposes of industrial use is in compliance with the size and shape of property necessary for that type of development , 2 . The General plan has set forth prov' ; 1cns for this type of lard use as !, wail as setting forth objectives for implementation of this type of use. I . . 3, r;ie property was previously stueled for this intensity of land use at the time the land use idesignation of general industrial allowing for corpor- &te offices and the high ris, node designation allowing for multi-•story buildings was placed on the subject property. 4 , the size , depth , frontage , street width and other design and improvement features of he proposed subdivision are proposed to be constructed in compliance with standard plans ar.d specifications on file with the City as well as in compliance with the State Map Act and supplemental City SJbdlvisiGn Ordinance . Excaglign (Yikri rLj) No. 87-95: 1 . Tie rite plan received and dated Decemter 29. 1987 . shall be revised depicting the modifications described herein; { a . Additional stairwells shall t•e provided vithin the parking struc- ture per Fire Deaartment requirements . Three stairwells shall, be added to the east side and one stairway shall be added to the west side. b . Full size parking stalis on-grade s►iai1 be dimensioned as 17 reet by 9 fee: with a 2 foot r,'oerhang . Additional 2 feet shall be added to the landscape planter for this overhang area . C. A decelerati -n lane along Bois& Avenue shall be provided a( the project ' s major entry, The length and design of the deceleration lane shall be subject to the review and approval of the Public Works Oepartmt, Page 12 - Council /A9ev,cy Minutes - 2/16/88 d. Building shall bn accessible on two (2) sides by way of roadways ( fire lane0 not less than twenty-seven (27) feet in width , with adequate turning ritdii . Roadway ( fire lanes ) shall be not be less than ten ( 10) fee': or more than thirty (30) feet frca building. Fire lanes shall provide access to a minimum of 50 percent of the ground floor perimeter of the buildings . I. A dedicatee fire lane shall be provided on all sides of the parking structure. -Fire lanes are for emergency access and crust be a mini- mum of twenty-four (24) feet in width . f. The surfacs parking layout of Phase I in the location of the Phase II parking structure shall be revised to encourage efficient ingress and egress from the signalized project entry on 8olsr Ave»- nul and discourage use of the secondary Bolsa Ohica entry. The revised parking lot layout shall big subject to the review and approval e%f the Planninw Director and Public Works Aepartment . 2 . Tne elevations received and dated Otcember 29. 1987. sha' 1 be revised depicting the modification described herein : A. Greater arcnitectural e-,phasls of the building base and building entrance shall be provided , The final elevations shall be subject to the review and approval of the Design Review Board. 3 . Prior ,o the issuance of a grading plan , the aoplic3nt shall submit a hydrology report for review and a�;roval of the Public i+orks Pepartnent. 4. prior to the issuance of building permits for Phase 1 , 8-story office building (excluding grading and foundation permits ) , the applicant shall submit th,, following dorum-ents for the review and approval of Department cf Public 'Hor'ts and Cc.%munity Deyelop^ent: 3. Soils analysis , prepared by a registered soils engineer. This analysis shall i ncl udt, on-site oil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to or-3vide detailed recom4rendations regirding grading, che-mical and fill properties . foundations , retaining walls , streets and utilities . b. Grading plan C . A Landscape and Irrigaticr, Plan. The Preliminary Landscape Plan, received and dated October 28. 19870 shall be revised depicting the modifications described herein . ( 1 ) Of the sixty 36" tox accent trees Indicated in the appli- cant ' s preliminary landscape plan , twenty shall be upgraded to 48" box size (this would include the 8 existing coral trees to be relocated) . (2) The trees in the perimeter planting area, between the parking lot and arterial streets , ind adjacent existing parking areas . shall be a minimum of 30" box size. The perimeter planting area shall be beraed. r.. , 1AR- M ma 00 MCDONNELL DOUGLAS CORP MCCGNNELL WNW C01tP . •' 5301, DOL.SA AY_ 5302 BOLSA :AVT: ATTN: 0. R:JORbAN A3-700 MS11-1 6669 •• HUNTINGTON BEACH CA HUNTINGTON IBEAN -.�•. ► 926470000 •� SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT �••••` EMERGENCY EPISODE TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PLAN ••• Regulation V11 of the South Coast Air Quality Management District requires industrial , buuiness , commercial , educational institutions , .grid government establishments, to prepare and implement plans for ; curtailing the operation of motor vehicles when air pollution episodes are forecast: Data provided on this form constitute your Transportation Management Plan. You must have a radio to receive notices of emergencies from the SCAM and a procedure for notifying employees when an emergency Is forecast. 1 . Type of Organization A ro Mfg . (Product) , Commercial , Gov ' t. , Educat crl, etc. 2 . Number of Employees : Number Required for Maximum Number Staffing During Major Total Number. Per Shift National Holidays or Total Number of Students It an Educational 69%2 69202 Institution Z59 3 . Number of Parking Spaces: Normally Used Total Available During weekdays i 69 630 ...... 5 12______._._ 4 . Dumber of Fleet Vehicles : Gas, Diesel , Other: Total Gas Diesel Other Needed on Holidays 100 100 _..._.10..._ 5 , Transportation Management: Program: You are required to institute effective measures to reduce the number of miles driven by employ eAc and fleet vehicles during air pollution episodes. Of these measure items (a) through (9) are MANDATORY to fulfill the minimum requirements for an approved plan . 'Yes No a . An er..ergenry radio to receive f forecasts from the SCAQMD? X ! b . A written log to recot'd second or third stage episode forecasts? ''�� "t: c. Mang of matcblvg •eaiplayees' for. rids'shar g3 +..... d. Procedures for notifying employees of ' pr takc d opi'�ode conditions and actions to fee*** - rtd�.ot n to reduce driving? „' ' • 4 avow • . •• • a. Procedures to update your Plan annually? f. An employee ridesharing orientation program? �,•••; �,,.".' ...0 . . . g . Measures to reduce fleet vehicle uses h . Use of Commuter-computer? i . Use of orange County Transit district Commuter Ridesharing Matching Services? � j . A list and/or map of employeie homA locations? ._j _. k. Full--time , trained transportation coordinator?� 1 . Establishment of a wanpool program? m. Establishment of a buspool program? ,__ L I n . Full or partial subsidization for carpooling , varpooling, buspooling, shuttles or use of public transit? o . .Subsidisation of parking for ridesharing employees? ,_, L p. Assignment of preferential or free parking for vehicles used for ridesharing? q . Facility improvements which provide preferential access and,/or egress for for ridesharing purposes:' r. Allowance for employees to utilize company owned fleet vehicles for ridashari.ng purposes?_ _ s . Employee bus passes offered free or available at a discount? X t . Bicycle facilities available? (showers, bike racks , etc . ) l u. Alternative work hours? (A 4/40 or 9/80 work schedule which has erployees working 40 hours in fewer than five days) Flextine? (Are enployee start/stop times flexible by 30 minutes or mare?) � X GNP . �I w. . Ea"*rs" vork'4..jurst (are', *sployea start OP :*Sao, + flexible but 'assigned by , is minutes or • - zLis x. 'Other (e.q. , methanol fleet vehicles) . Please :`•:`: �• • ... . specify., cn &rn attachxd ohtet (NopO Motorcycles and electric scooters) ►Documentat.ion Faust be available to District personnel �"'•`i on, request .. • 6 . Name, title, and telephone number of your TRANSPORTATION ... f MANAGEMENT COORDINATOR and alternate. If there is a �•+ change, you should notify the District. Name L. D. Andersort I Title Sr. Mtr - Es AuxfliaU Services Telephone Number 171+1 296-45B2 Alternate Coordinator D. R_� ¢J rein !COMPANY OFFICIAL* A company official must certify this Plan. It is a :e931 and binding document . Your company will be held responsible for fulfilling its obligations as specified in this Plan . When you receive your Approved Plan beck from the District, you mum file it and have it available For inspection. • I i Signatures Name and Title vice #Mt M Ims nneess, 1% meat , Telephone '(714) PLEASE SUBMIT TWO COPIES . MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO: South Coast Rir Quality Management District Attn : Transportation Manrgenent Unit 9150 East Flair Drive El Monte, California 91731 ( For SCAQMD Use Only) Date Plan Received ANV Date Plan Approved �93 7 Sector No._ Source Receptor Area i ..•. .tip y i fill 11111 I fly+! 191114 ,0111 f! f rr sell ' i �t tell 1010 hill I oil 60 01 ! f 1 k , 111 I 1 1 II 1111�1 11 IU ,1 1 .1111,1ftU 11II i1114 1■ � 1 i , ,,�,��1 ��,,��1,{ f null , nt /,.,.}i}�.e ; • � 1 ►1 I11/ .1111:717i(7i1 i1F 11T, ,I{ 1 1 ll Illl If �(1,1{ i J' 1 Ir„ 11 1 n 1 iln f ', — • 1 1 1 } 1 1 1 1' 11'�M�q ' _ .__ � �� " 1 1' •) 1� 1 1 1 1 11 1 11 � I 1 /1; Illll/li llllll-1' 111111, '' ' `+ IIIIW 1111.1 J11 II If1 '1:f'lllll,ll •,11 1 ' r 1115 1 ' 1►ll Illilf�l{ 1 � w1 `,It—li 51�1-e•IIII II IIi,I 1 ! oll 111bow . _ _ _._ _._..._=�-----+T'ITTF�"" .. ...-':�ITT:�=� T'!�'T"'.."+�e'•�,�m' ••'':.'�„_ • • .. 1'}� Cipr�i�r�M■Ir 111w1i�MA cow 40 so a"awk on^ CA WAS1.,. f i3 � �!� j • � DAV I D KOORE 4713 A1IENNOOR AVE. LAKEVOOD , CA 90713 I �t� '• . .'..= 195- 184-•04 FIRST CLASS MAID. In Oft Li�i� Na�ie• _ _ •��7'{ p. 1 .�..Rli. i ti �:''t _�14 Jjr�. .. �. ..ro..��1.�,� 1M •�S •92mt • KQOidi37A� co << ATSUKO KOBAYASHI 5792 SPA DRIVE EIUNTIKCTON BEACH , CA 97647 195- 213- 17 FIRST CLASS MAIL. 6 t : oLtricION MO. 1357 f. A RESOLUTION OF TRZ PXAAMMO COMMISSidll OP THE CITY OF HUNTYMMN BEACH AWPTING A LIST OF USES WHICH WILL BE ALLOMED AS PART OF THE ? CD0 LL- DOWLAS OFFICE COMPLEX, A MIXED-USE INMSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT# LOCATED AT THE VORTHEAST CORNER OF BOLSA AVENUE AND HOLSA CHICA STREET WHEREAS, the McDonnell-Douglas Office Complex is situated at the northeabt corner of Bolsa Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street within the M1-A Restricted Manufacturing District; and , I II WHEREAS, the M1-A District contains a provision (Section 9510 . 14) permitting Mixed Uses which include certain types of retail, commercial, office and service uses which, because of the nature of their operation or space needs , should more appropriately located within a light industrial development; and, WHEREAS, Section 9510 . 14 (a) of the Huntington Beach ordinance Code requires that a resolution be adopted by the Planning Commission prior to the approval of a conditional use permit in order to establish a listing of uses which will be allowed in nixed use industrial development ; and i i WHEREAS , the intent of this Resolution is to set forth the specific type of uses permitted within the McDonnell Douglaa Office Complex so as to provide guidance to the Department of Community Development in authorising occupancy of the buildings within such mixed use developments; and WHEREAS , the developer has _greed to keep the City apprised at all times of the ratio of commercial , general office and corporate office operations, so that the project does not exceed that which is authorised by the approval of Conditional Use Permit 87-44 ; and, any violation of the terms of this Resolution at any condition of approval of Conditional Use Permit 070-44 shall automatically subject the Conditional Use Permit to a public hearing for possible revocation; and, r" ' T_eA - A rr'AeA UFAT 6;1 r , WHEREAS, Phase I construction of the project shall include the following development: d Story Office Tower 235, 831 gross square feet 1 Restrurant y7, 000 gross square feet 242, 831 gross square feet 1,096 surface parking spaces I WHEREAS, Phase 11 construction of the project small include the following development: 12 Story Office Tower 345 ,551 gross square feet 1 Restaurant 70000 gross squaro feet I Support Retail Building 9JkQ gross square feet 3620151 gross square feet 257 Surface parking spaces 2, 030 Parking spaces within structure WHEREAS , ultimate buildout of the McDonnell-Douglas Office Complex will include a total of the following developm*rit . 8 Story Office Tower 235, 831 gross square feet 12 Story. Office Tower 345, 351 gross egUAre feet 2 Restaurants 14 , 000 I rots square feet g 1 Support Retail Building 9, 600 gross square feet 6040982 gross square feet 494 Surface parking spaces 2, 030 Parking spaces within structure WHEREAS, the total floor area of all commercial, general office and service uses shall not exceed thirty-five percent (35%) of the original gross floor area of all buildings, and the remaining sixty-five percent (65%) of the original gross floor area of all buildings shall be restricted to corporate office use. *,Wl THIEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the following wised uses shall be permitted in the buildings ccnstructed during Phase t construction, and any additions, modifications, or revisions to this list shall requiree a revised resolution prior to establishment of any such addition, :modification, or revision : Is Resolution -2- ( 9600d) (7 , 000 gross square feet) A single restaurant use shall be permitted to serve the tenants of the office building and xurrounding industrial uses . The restaurant shall be limited to hours of operation 6 : 00 a.m. to 12 :00 Midnight. Give entertainment, sale of alcohol, drive thru windows or expanded hours of operation shall, be subject to new entitlement. GenR,rl I O Ei a Ualk ( 71, 750 gross square feet) General. Office Uses such as Attorney, Accountant, Engineer, Architecture and Planning, Insurance, Collection Agency, Manufacturer ' s Representative, Community/Social Services, Diagnostic/Biochemical laboratories , and Real Estate Sales . Medical and dent&! Offices, including chiropractor, optometrist, physician and surgeon and emergency awdical centers and clinics shall be prohibited . COK2grate, Of f ice Mag ( 164 , 080 gross square feet or 65 percent of gross floor area) Administrative, management, regional or headquarters offices for any permitted industrial use which is not primarily intended to serve the general public and trade schools, limited to industrial occupation training (excluding commercial business schools and colleges) . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the following mixed uses shall be permitted in btAldi:rgs constructed during Phaae 11 construction, and any additions, :codifications , or revisions to this list shall require a revised resolution prior to establishment of any such addition„ modification, or revision: F . Resolution (f 600d) Beat�u,�6nt ( 7 , OOQ gross sque+re feet) A single restaurant use shall be permitted to serve the tenants of the office building and surrounding industrial uses . The restaurant shall be limited to hours of operation 6 : 00 a.m. to 12 :00 Midnight . Live entertainment, sale of alcohol, drive thru windows or expanded hours of i operation shall be subject to new entitlement . ayma Retail euiidina (9, 6OO gross square feet) Services such as McDonnell -Douglas Credit Union, travel agency, newspaper and magas3.ne sales , stationary and office t; supplies ; printing or copying service, :sail service, telephone answering service, laundry, dry cleaning, shoe repair, office equipment repair and sales , and food service establishments with less than 12 seats . g ee _0 f f ice Use General Office Uses such as Attorney, Accountant, Engineer, Architecture and Planning , Insurance, Collection Agency, Manufacturer ' s Representative, Community/Social Services, Diagnostic/Biochemical laboratories , and Real Estate Sales . Medical and dental OEfices , including chiropractor, optometrist, physician and surgeon and emergency medical centers and clinics shall be prohibited. m o o r aIJL-Qf Lice 1112 Administrative, management, regional or headquarters offices for any permitted industrial use which is not primarily intended to serve the general public and trade schools, limited to industrial occr.pation training (excluding commercial business schools and colleges) . Oil Resalution -4-,.�,A � �� .. (�+ (960Od) ' After completion of Phase II construction, tha permitted gross square footages of the sized uses shall be increased to the following figures : Restaurant 14, 000 gross square feet Support Retail Buildin4 9, 600 gross square feet General Official Use 188, 1.43 gross square feet Corporates office Use 393, 23$ gross square feet PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commissions of the City of Huntington Beach, California, on the 5th. day of January 1988, by the following roll Call vote: AYES: Silva , Schumacher, Pierce, Leipzig , L.ivengood Noss: bone ABSENT: Higgins ABSTAIN: None ATTEST: w Mike Adams, Secretary Planning Commission Chairman 70 Resolution (9800d) Publish 2/4/18 Mo WBUCLAWA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVLPY that the Huntington Beach City Council will bal4 public hearing in thes Council Chaube3r at the Huntington beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street , Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statera►ents of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. Tuesday, February 16, 1988 7 : 00 P.M. i AiT: Appeals filed to the Planning Cornmission 'e approval of Conditional Use Permit 87-44/Conditional Ezception 87-95/Tentative Parcel Map 87-424/Environmental Impact Report 87-4 ArELI McDonnell bouglas Realty Company City of Westminster City Council and HOM Property Management, Inc. L,QQ,f: Northeast corner of Bolan Avenue and Bolsa Chico Street FQFQSWit: Develop mixed use office complex on 18 .42 acres of Land . Project includes one 12 story building , one 6 story building , two restaurant pads , an ancillary corcmercial/retail use building , a parking attucture and at grade parking . MIRMW Environmental Impact Report No. 87-4 j analyzes the potential impacts of the project and identifies appropr14t6 mi tlgation measures Copies of CUP 87-44/CE 87-95/TPM 87-424 i EIR 57--4 are on file in the Office of the City Clerk ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. All applications, exhibits , and descriptions of this propoKal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street , Huntington Beach, California , for inspection by the public. HUNTI NGTON BEACH CITY C01W I L By: Alicia K. Wentvgorth City Clerk Phone (714 ) 536-5405 Dated 1/27/88 it i L"al Italics My of t4wwb*en oflia of em Cky clerk ►fumM tan saM, CA S A f, r , FIRST CLASS MAIL f4 } 3 i Uhlftblimb 2/4/EE �L � s�ta�tsra ee■it�� - '�' sue► �-�&M 17- 17- NOTICE 15 HEREBY CIVZX that the Nuntington dRach City Council will hold public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on, the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the stateeaants of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. : Tuesday, February, 16 , 1988 7:00 P.M . T: Appeals file to the Planning Commission' s approval of Conditional Use Permit 87-44/Conditional Exception ! 87-95/Tentative Parcel 14ap 87-424/Environmental Impact Report 87-4 ` R ZCAN'r: McDonnell Douglas Realty Company City of Westminster City Council and Hilt Property Management , Inc. Ir 'Y' Northeast corner of Bolsa Avenue and eolsa Chica ` Street ERM Develop mixed use office complex on 1a . 42 acres of land . Project includes one 12 story building, one 8 story building, two restaurant pads, an ancillary commercial/retail use building , a parking structure arks at grade parking . { M-1ROMMhTLTS[� Environmental Impact Report No . 87-4 analyzes the potential impacts of the project and identifies appropriate mitigation measures Ol flu: Copies of CUP 87-44/CE 87-95/TPM 87-424 & EIR 87-4 are on file in the Office of the City Clerk ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above . All applications , exhibits , and descriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, for inspection by the public. HUNTINGT N BUCH CITY COUNCIL By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk Phone (714) 538-5405 Dater! 1/27/88 h pL e -�.. • •ti Vorleg or Punic im"M V7 M- ��s1 �j cW•.vl 1 •+g fkS ck f f�! Cam+ NOTICE IS HEREBY CIVEIi that the iiunt�dgton 1le�,►c City Council will bold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Hain Street, Huntington Beach, California, di the date And At the tine indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DM.A 7 ��f r A~p�r.A.Q a�- 't�la,�.n.�r.•� G�uma��+ +'s �ppro� mf C�naG�+o'w�!tkc. rrwi+ �JI� 07- °1 4;/ W fYe~.?AWu� 17-ftj 1 OPW 14nP COW)U1� AA& AL4R AeC.cf 'p ��_d use. n� � l on 1� .�Z ar•�� avtt�l • o i• p l LO r-+ wt e- udt S OA-e, i I st j 6V 1' l&Oj , nee. bust , tWa wy+x�,6A- PAIS , art amuA4,-y a mmew ua.t Ire. a ?air kU4-Pj 41-1A C kOV, ,ten,k ot} - V AA h4AA*4 . ElIVLAt)!Ifl X TAL STATUS : �A ?04e.'K+iX. trV'PU+-S of U.� 4�iVC4 cud 1d M+'4f S AFrr&1y1"t. Nil r 'ao- WA s. CM lIL.[: ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and *%press opinions or submit evidence for or aaair,st the application as outlined above. All applications, exhibits, mad .lescriptions of this proposal ere on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, for inspection by the public . HUNT INCTON 9E.4,C'H CITY CDUNCI L By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clark rbone (714) 536-5405 Dated »ell NOT'ICE �0 LE'K TO SCHEWLE PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 1-y4 7- 15 7- 1tR. H 7- `1 TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE DATE: FROM: n-�,. a�-,r►.._ PLEASE SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING USING THE ATTACHED LEGAL NOTICE FOR THE ` h DAY OF , 198ts. AP' s are attached AP' s will follow ,No AP' s Initiated by-. PlanninG Commission Planning DeparLrent Petition Appeal Other 1 � Adoption of Environment-al Status (x) Erg Has City Attorney's Office been YES [NUS add` t* ^"'� informed of forthcoming public ka► l.,. hearing? A� Refer to Planning Department - Extension for additional information. • if appeal , please transmit exact wording to be required in the legal . IF COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT - PLEASE MARK APPEALABLE NOT APPEALABLE 1 f, Ike ftm tM M IgLYa1 S. PAYNX 6091 LARCRW= DRi'YX • KLlff?I*GTa* 89ACB, CA 97647 A.p. No. 195-031-56 i I� FPST CLASS MAIL II' TRA TUN . 6061 L"CXWO00 6AWL" HUNTINGTom BEACH, CA 92647 A.P. N0. 195-031-59 FIRST CLASS MAIL r • i� TERRY C. 1PprKM" 14951 NORTHRIDGE LANC HUNTINGTON BLACK, CA 92649 I! A.P. No. 195-051-21 FIRST CLASS MAIL K 11 Cw�c. C�n�tr oleo wtvwfft► t•- Hlva. �Jc.,}n�,►ti},tr, CA AV, G EY G.kr� w FRST CLASS MAIL 7 RiCtiJutb R. COLI, 11tt7S�'Sti 3149 PMEIStA AVlXn ..- COSTA KRZA, CA 92626 0 A.P. x0. 195-051-63 FPST CLASS MAIL U1t�..�.0�ir►�c v v��c. fV+Mt wr+� A,,,,�, �j 1G0 ${Lti:IL.�eCi IRA- CA 42-te9,5- 1*1143 • ' FIRST CLASS MAIL D. C. WILSON 608: JA.OE CIRCLZ lSUWTZMGTCM BRACH, CA 92647 A. P. N0. 195-031-34 • wro� FIRST CLASS MAIL HAZHL A. DOZ 6072 JADE CIRCLE H=7ZK6-TO?1 pZACH, CA 92447 f r A.p. Wo. 195-031-33 l o ra t o FIRST CLASS hML I D+OIWWO L. L GNDGRXN .� 6102 JADE CIRCLR YUNTINGTOM MACN, CA 92647 a.P- Na. 195-031-36 i FIRST CLASS LARR-1 BRoCRm 6081 XELSBY CIRCLt HUWTINGTOM BEACH, CA 92b4? �.p. N0. 195-031.30 • FRST CLASS MAIL KARK JOSEPH LA CO"Z 606,2 KUSEY CIRCLE HUNTINGTON BF-ACH► CA 93647 A.P. No. 195-031-50 • FST CLASS MAIL" GAYLON J. rZ VRZES 6092 XBLSEY CIRCLE ItMrl*GrM stACH, CA 92647 A.P. NO. 19S-031-53 FIRST CLASS MAIL aim --- al I Nrr 1 r/ o*4*A ROIIALD SBBKEMAM • 6072 RGLSEY CIRCf.9 •� IIpN' loc?ON amcm. CA 92047 A.P. NU. 195-011-51 FIRST CLASS MAIL WAS SAWrH Hsu 6102 RELSEY CIRCLX NUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 is A.P. NO. 195-0.11-54 i FIRST CLASS MAIL RAYMOND P. CREHI N 6081 J.ARCJiWWO DRIVE HUNTINGTON OtACH, CA '.2647 i A.P. NO. 195-031•-57 FIRST CLASS MAIL &"A,CA one SULO K ZSTSLt.9 AZt~r'.'c 6062 LARCN1OM DRIVE NU`WT:YGT*N HFACHo CA 92647 A.P. 00. 195.051-08 i T CLASS MAIL ON" of dw off mirk ollm JOHN E. DICKERSON 6091. Y_FLSEY CIRCLE flUNTINGT011 BEACH, CA 92647 A.P. 110. 195-031-39 • FIRST CLASS MAIL MICHAEL J. SUNDSTED^ 6092 JADE CIRCLE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. *32647 A, P. NO. H 'IRS CLASS MAIL i NEVIN -r. t1i!;RRV' S0H 6071 KELSEY CIKCLE IttJ' -INUTC1;4 BEACH, (A 92647 A. P. NO. 195--031-40 • FIRST CLASS MAIL a TPOMAS E. PARM 6101 It£L9iY CIPME XlrjT 1 ycToo B EACH O CA 92647 A.P. 00. 195-031-37 SST CLASS MAL of NAM EMI >awK CA asr• I FRITS A. WEEKS 6071 LARCHW>0D DRIVE HiJN-MIGTON BEACH, CA '02647 A. P. 110. 195-031-58 Haftmp I FIRST CLASS MAIL. DONAL D M. PL ATT 6101 LARCHWOOD DRIVE HUN':IVZTON 3EACEj, CA 92647 A.P. No. 195-031-55 i ' FIRS` ' CLASS MAIL I { II L;I RY POSEN 6082 KE:LSEY CIRCLE HC?JTYI•GT0N BEACH, CA 91647 A. P. 90. 195-031-52 He mo NOW" 0i..ASS MAIL Ql1i�s of tM CN1► C�Ic f•. C.� 140 Nunttrweon MrsA.rA aw JANET L. JUNZ 6061 KELSEY CIRCLE HLW?jjl=oj nrAa# CA 92647 A.P. PC- 195-031-41 i +ter FIRST CLASS MAIL %W"q Ckv go tit oo* so" aren a an Ofy cot r,0."M1w Mr ei w On*.CA!N Madelyn McRae 5452 S'aru'ust Dr. .� Huntington Beach, CA 92647 • A.P. 195. 183-03 Jj FIRST CLASS MAIL Carl smith 14442 Danes %i r. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 A.P. 195-072-35 Ho FIRST CLASS MAIL Ownw •L*C" ..'CCC.•.� l.ct4t'�'*� L�tnt• 1�:11�11.J�iL'.1L� laci! , to Mr. Itcivo-r4en J� "'ftIRST CLASS MAIL lulls Nwaft'" City of Hundr t•N itch O fiat of ON City C*F% 01. 0,is 1N M�rli M ftnf►,GA 0" ANTNONY 502MtCK 14971 A"ItE L"I OUNTINGTC* NZACR# CA 94-447 A.P. NG. 195-051-16 SST SS Ai AL �.%a" Im .lrri, CA /AW theodGrp Hatfield 14481 Chateau lane Huntington Beach, CA 92647 A.P. 195-071 -4'!7 FIRST CLASS MAIL He'rbert C. Hendricks 5421 Harold Place Huntington Beach. CA 92647 A.P. 195. 181-08 • j FIRST CLASS MAIL Martin G. Rezmer P.O. Box 2704-485 Hunti --*an Beach , CA 92647 N.P. 195-182-05 i JJ � FIRST CLASS LASS MAIL M City•f ""mwp" Basch off of d" city Cwk P. 0. "a 190 Nrwtiw�tww ft000h.CA !?W Northslde Develope*nt 6303 Wilshire Blvd. Los Angties, CA 9M8 I A.P. 195-182-11 W'Aalh.. z'�+r ;4 r ,.... 00%0 of Ow CNy► pert P.aOft 1M CA on" Douglas k. Carrington 5411 Harold PI ixe Huntington Beach, CA 92647 195-181-09 J� FIRST CLASS MAIL Douglas Bonde En um 17101 Westport or. Hunington Beach. CA 92647 A.Q. 195-072-39 FitFIRST CLASS MAIL James Koval 14461 Chateau lane Huntington Beach, CA 92647 A.P. 195-071-21 J� i F RST CLASS MAIL i 1 hmjWq A & k.CA 0" j Charles Zabinski 14441 Chateau Lane Huntington Beach, CA 9M7 + A.A. 05-071-20 • � •sOIIVSA hUDISaN 6031 GLMWOOD DRIVE i HUNTINUMN BP.ACH, CA '92647 MARTIN 'I'itOMS 6001 HARL+ILC11 CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 ��►��OI2-18, 18 KACOR MES7MENTS CORP. P. 0, BOX 308 CARLSBAD$ CA 92008 6. 145-531-25 �r V 14 I;pol v �(All �� AM I ' Lauire Grac• JOH31 ANIOL DRUCE DMING 14452 TUWCO NOAD 5552 SPA DRIVE 0 14411 SPA ORZVt IiC5mliNSTPR, CA 92683 HUN?INGTON EVACH, CA 92647 NUNt'INGT M BFAC'Ht CA 92647 19 ri-i 1.1-73 19 5-196-07 CHARLES BACLET GLWIA PARKLR Jerome Schultz P.O. WX 837 6021 COK"EZ DRIVE 14335 BLACXPOOL ROAD SOL'"I'}} MIDWAY CITY, CA 92655 HUNTING-M4. BEACH, CA 92647 WEST.MrNSTER, CA 92683 195-212-14 195-422-49 CGRLGN 6 E",,•5IF PHI:.LZPS ALVIIi :{ARP SGOEll-: 6072 SPEPIUV4 DRIVE 5822 SPA CRTVE SIB: VICTORIA PI1',CE }ftJ2iT'I.�, WES7YlI}iSTGR CA 9''Fi83 i�ti 8F.ACH$ CA 92647 HUNTINGTQN BEACH, CA 92647 ' ` 195-213-19 195-423-05 SCaAli :�F.YS rlil.Oli I'RAZIER DUNC.ZN JUAN A7.' RCOti 6021 IVORY CSRCLE 1.3 301 SPA DRIVE 5821 SPA DRIVE HU11T11IGM?J BEAC}I, CA 92647 GTO fiUNTI17ti 8EA1'Ji, CA 92647 i{U:iTI:iG'Lrnii HE:ACH, CA 52E +7 195-031-OU 195-214-09 295-195-03 14 Adam 4-a 1 .., ,. • :� • _ V ' Al, �� LOUISE RA fCOT JArpiSfi SEKNON RnNALD i SNAPON 374PSON 5275 VICTIRTA PLACE 5112 CHURCHILL AVENUE 5062 GYLLI11CHL?l CIRCLE WZSTM24STER , CA 926831 WLSTMTNST'Elt, CA 92683" WESTHT11STER , CA 926113 195--423-53 195-441-44 195-451 -11 tOSEPH TEIJETRA Gr"1N EUN JkCINTO SORIANO 52:1 VICTORIA PLACF 5102 CHURCHILL AVE , 5092 CILLINGHAM CIRPLZ WIMNvNSTER , CA 92683 WESTMINSTER , CA 92683 WESTMINSTER , CA 97633 195-423--54 195-441- 45 195-451-14 DAVID SILIN 14422 SUFFOLK STREET ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD ALBERT ALDUROTY j WESTMINSTER CA 92683 CO'.ZTROL DISTRICT 5102 GILLINGHAM CIRCLE 195-423- 55 195- 441- 52 WESTMINSTER , CA 91683 195-4i1 - 15 WESTMINSTER VILLAGE ORANGE COL'ti &'Y FLOOD JORGE CARVAJAL 200E+2 LAVSON LANE CO" ROL DISTRICT 5121 GILLINrHAM CIRCLE HUNTINGTON BEACH , CA92646 195-441- 53 WESTMINSTER , CA 92683 195-423-61 195-4S1-16 i WESTMINSTER VTLLAGE XTIECCLER PETER ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD I 2n062 LAWSON LANE 14571 SOUTHFIEI.D DRIVE CONTROL DTSTRTCT HUNTINGTON BEACH , CA92646 WESTMINSTER , CA 92683 195-451 -17 195--423-64 195-451 -06 WF.STMINSTr R VILLAGE WET I10 MIND SARI, ZENK 20062 LAWSON '.AWE 734 N . TUSTIN STREET 5111 CILLINCH.AM CIRCLE HUNTINGTON BEACH , CA 92646 ORAMCF9 CA . 92667 WESTMINSTER , CA 926PI 195-423-65 195-451-07 195-451-18 I CHAMk'AUR BRAR SITAFREDE:RICK BUCHMAN 5151 CHURCHILL AVE . 145?1E:Y UTHKAY 5131 GILLINGHAM CIRCLE WESTMINSTER CA 92683 WEST WESTMINSTER , ICA DRIVE WESTMINSTER CA 97683 uF.S*MIHST>~R CA 92G83 195-441-39 195-451 -08 19 �--451-21 NARNO DE CHAVES GREG HARRIS ANTONY-T1!NC-LTE CHANG 5161 CHUPCHILL AVENUE 14581 SOUTHFTELD DRIVE: 5091 CTLLINGHAM CIRCLE WESTMINSTER , CA 92683 WESTMINSTER , CA 92683 WESTMINSTER , CA 92683 195-441-40 195- 451-09 195-451 -20 ED'4ARD DAOUD 501INNTE JOHNSON 5152 CHURCHILL 14 572 SOUTH FI ELD DRIVE WESTMINSTER , CA Q2683 WESTMINSTER , CA. 92683 l95-441 -41 195-451- 10 ARTON STEVENSON WILLARD ANDRE 5142 CHURCHtLL AVENUE 4143 SUSSEX CIRCLE WESTMINSTER, CA 92683 CYPRESS , CA 90630 195-441-42 195-451-11 CERALL BEAUDOIN THONAS HOLDER 5122. CHURCHILL AVEYUX 5063 GILLINGHAM CIRCLE WESTMINSTER $ CA 92683 WES':MINSTER , CA 92683 195-441-43 19S-4SI-17 SOUTH COAST CLUB YAC;'R lNVEJr?T W,?S CORD. ,nhVI D ADDISON ;003; 15132 BOLSA CHICA ROAD ►n J. BOX : 08 a. 131 GLTNWOD DRX'n' HUNTINGTON SCAM CA "CABISBAD, CA 92nobl HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 92649 145-531-25 195-011-03 145-014-02 NICK BECKER ET AL KACOR REALTY INC . DANIEL WELTER 15558 Graham Street P .O. BOX 308 6051 GLENWOOD DRIVE HUNTINGTON BEACH , CA CARLSBAD, CA 92008 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 92649 145-531- 28 195-011-04 14 5-014-35 XACOR INVF.SINMENT COP.P. CHARLES 0"BRIEN JOHN T HEWZTT P.O. BOX 308 6002 GLEN'irjOD DRIVE 129 SHELDON STREET CARLSBAD , CA 92008 HfINTINGTON BEAC-lit CA 9264", EL SEGI.NDO, CA 90245 '45-531-29 195-012-01 145-014-32 ALFONSO Li:/,TA NICK BECKER KEVIN PRIESTLEY 1569: BUTTERFIELD STREET 15558 GRAIIA14 S L 2867 E . COAST lliri 'MLSTMINSTER4 CA HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 SUITE 103 92683 CORONA DEL MAR, CA 92:i23 145-014-51 .145-531-30 195-012-02 PAUL LICATA KACOR INVESTMENTS CORP MICHAEL GUTTEINTAG i 3356 W BALL ROAD t109 P .O. LOX 308 6032 GLENWOOD DRIVE ANAHEIM , CA 92804 CARLSBAD* CA 92008 HUNTINGTON BEACH , CA 92647 145-014-52 145-531- 3.1 19;-01.2-03 i LEASEBACK INVESTMENTS KACOR INNVESr,!EN'T CORP . TIMOTHY GREENE 254 N . LAUREL AVE P .O. BOX 308 6C52 GLENWOOD DRIVE DES PLAINES , IL CARLSBAD, CA 92008 HUNTINGTON DEAC}i r CA 92647 60616 145-541-04 , 05006 , 07, 08 , 09 195-012-04 145-014-53 RREEF-IV INC KACOR INVESTMENTS COR_n EUGENE OPFER 1630 S . SUNKIST STREET P .O . BOX 308 19231 WORCHESTER LANE SUITE B CARLSBAD, CA 92008 HUNTINGTON BEACH , CA 92646 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 145-541- 10 , 11012 , 13 , 14 , 15 195-012-15 1.45-014- . 4 RREEF-IV INC STELLRECHT, ROBERT SOUTH PACIFIC PROPERTIES 1630 S . SUNKrST STREET' 16591 GRAN.-%M PLACE 6303 WILSITYRE BLVD SUITE B HUNlITNGTON BEACH , CA 92649 LOS ANGELES, CA 90048 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 145-.41-21 1.95-012-16 145-014-55 BOLSA AVE PT`RS LTD. PUBLIC STORU:GE EURO ROBERT CARTER 881 Dover Dr P.O BOX 25050 6303 WILSHIRE BLVD SUI71E 24 GLENDALE, CA 91201. LOS ANGELES, CA 90048 NETiPORT BEACH, CA 145-541--22 195-012-16 145-014-59 92662 BOLSA AVE PARTNERS THOMAS MELTON SOUTH PACIFIC PROPERTIES 881. DOVER DOVER 6001 GI.E.NWGOD DRIVE 6303 WILSHIRE BLVD. SUITE 34 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 94-9647 LOS .NNGELLS * CA 90048 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663195-011-01 195-OL2--17 145-014-6 1. TREDLO4 HOGENS SUNRISE PROPERTIES INC. KENNETH HENDERSON 6302 WILSHIRE BLVD. 445 S . FIGUZROA STREET 6021 GLENWDOD DRIVE LOS ANGELES, CA 90048 Irt,)S ANV£?,ES , CA 90071 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 19 5-012-17 145-364-17 195-011-02 CHARLES ABELL �p$4 1rlARTIN THO.XAS (�o 6022 JADE. CIRCLE 31 IVORY CIRCLE 101 HAPDMXCr, CI R HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 HUNTINGTON SEACH, CA 9.7647 195-031-29 195-031-08 195-012-18, 18 LFANNA THURMAN ROBERT BREWER 6001 IVORY CIRCLE SOUTH PACIFIC PROPERTIES 6032 JADE CIRCLE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 6303 WILSHIRE BLVD HUNTINGTON BEACH , CA 92647 195-031-09 LOS ANGELES , CA 90048 195-031-20 195-012-19 PH:'LI? SIMPSON It TOM METZGER 6r52 JADE CIRCLE. DONA YA:D 6303 WT! MIRE BLVD HUNTINGTON BEACH , CA 92647 6002 IVGRY CIRCLE LOS ANGE'LES , CA 90048 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 195-012-19 195-031-31 105-03.1-10 STEVEN EDLEFSEN ELMER SPrRAGUE DGNALD STI ,; 6051 KELSEY CIRCLE 6022 IVORY CIRCLL: 6022 HARDW'::1' ;;IR HUNTINGTON 9EACH, CA 92647 HJNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 AUNTINGTON BEACH , CA 92647 195-031-42 195-031-11 195-012-20 WILLIAM LEWD JOHN CRAY SOUTH PACI_' IC PROPERTIES 5031 KELSEY CIRCLE 6032 IVORY CIRCLE: 6303 WILSHIRE BLVr AUNTINGTON BEACH , CA 9261'%'6 Huntington Reach, CA 92647 LOS AWN GELES , CA 90048 195-031- 43 195-031- 12 195-012-2.1 MICHAEL FOU►ITAIN 1.ARRY MUCKRIDGE 6021 KELSEY i .IRCLE 6032 IVORY C.IRCi E CAROL LITTLEJOHN HUNTINGTON BEACH , CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BFACH , C-A 92W 6303 WILSHIRE BLVD . 195-031-44 195-031-13 LOS ANGELES , CA *0048 :95-012-21 LEWIS STORRER CHARLFS STRAUB ROY HARBORD 16 512 FETTI.ER LAME 6052 fl;iRDWICK CIRCLE 6001 KELSFY CIRCLE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 9?647 HUNTINGTON BEACH , CA 9k647 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 1cl5-031-24 195-012-22 195-031-45 IiOh' :RD ALLEGAR CARY PARTRIDGE ROBERT HENDERSON 6051 IVORY CIRCLE 6002 KELSEY CIRCLE 6031 JADL CIRCLE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH , CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH , CA 92647 195-031-06 195-031-46 195-031.- 2� MARIA JORDAN NORMAN MARTIN ARCHIE COOPER 6021 JADE CIRCLE 6031 IVORY CIRCLE 6022 EKLSEY CIRCLE HUNTINGTON BEACTi , CA 92647 HUNTINGTON REACH , CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH , CA 92647 195-031-26 .195-131-07 195-031-47 JOHN MARCH John Crater STEPHEN MARING 6541 CRISTA PALMA DRIVE 20101 IMPERIAL COVE LANE 6031 IVORY CIRCLE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 1.95-031-48 195-031-27 195-031-07 E,7WIN HUDSON DAYID GOECX.E FRAZIER DUNCAN 6052 KELSE? CIRCLE 6002 JADE CIRCLE 6021 IVORY CIRCLE HUNTINGTON BEACHo CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH* CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 195-031-49 145-0;1-28 195--031-08 r. '+UCINDA WILEY P-ENNA PAR%RR /.,p�}� ^GRAON A ELSIC PnILLIPS 60;+1 LARAMWOOD DRIVE 21 CORTEZ DRIVL 372 SHLRMAN DIIVF 6611r HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 9264'�y`'RUNTINGTOh B:ACN., CA 9264 HURTINGTOI 19ACRo CA 92647 195-031-bQ 195-051-58 195-053-U9 ' RAI.PH LEWIS MICHAEL MULLIGAN PAUL REKDI FAIL c:0� ' LARCHWOOD DRIVE 6011. CORTEZ DRIVE 1423 RED04DO REACy St%'D. hUNTINGTON BEACH , CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH , CA 92647 GAR*1ENA, CA 90247 195-031-61 195-051-59 ..15-053•-17 GABRIELLA KEITU SCARTEEN CORD' . ROBERT HAINES 6041 CORTEZ DRIVE P.O. BOX 760C 6021 LARCHWOOD DRIVE HUNTINGTON BEACH , CA 92647 L03 ANGELES , CA 9Q054 HUNTIN.xTON BEACH, CA 92447 195-051-60 195-031-62 *41NSOME HOMES INC SALVADOR YBARRA LiOWIENCE MI!YER• ,303 WILSHIRE BLVD 6002 CORTEZ DRIVE 14025 AVST AVE . LOS ANGELES ,' CA 90048 HtJ:)TINGn."1' BEACH, CA 926.17 LET.LrLOWEP. , CA 90706 i95-031-i� � 195--053-01 195-033- 19 PATRICK O'S?tIEtI NFLIsE FINOC1{IO JA.MXS FOX 14 331 TIOPICANA LANE 14 50 W CHATEAU LANE 6303 WILSHIRE BLVD. HUNTINGTONBRAC!l . CA 92647 HUNTINCTON BEACH , CA 92647 LOS ANGELES, CA 90048 295-053-02 195-071 -•2 195--031-63 MARY NEVILLE PAUL PRF.USS LOREN KLICK 6002 LARCHWOOD DRIVE 6J32 CORTEZ DRIVE 6052 BRIARCLrFF DRIVE FIUNTIN%TON BEACH, CA 92647 itUN;'IPJG`!'0i: BEACH, CA 92647 HUNT I NCTOR BEAL{{ I CA 92 E u 7 195-051•-6 4 195-053-03 195 -0 7 3-10 OSCAR GUARDERAS JAM ES Mr TCHELL 18282 FIELLBURY LAN0 21731 SEASIDE ljNNF MARLENE ;JOLBERT HUNTINGTO:t 3EACH , CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 6032 BRTAKCLIFF DRIVE NUNTINGTON BEACH . GA 92617 195-051-OS 195-05 ?-04 195-073-•11 CARL BRANSON RO.' ERT CFISS r,1 I{��Ar..n 1ASE 6032 LARCHWOOD DRIVE 14381 VANGUARD I.A-14E 6022 BRIAP.CLTFF PRIvr HUNGINGTON BEACH , CA 92647 HUNTItiGT0N BEACH , CA 92"647 11UNT'T."C ON DEArK CA 92647 195-051-06 195-033-05 195-.073 - ;? SUN HAN_HFING CARP PE:CEkSEN EMPRESS HOMES INC . 6052 LAP.CHWO 'D DRIVE 1 : 891 VANGUARD t.N . 6303 VILSHIR% BLVD . HFF NTINGTON JEACH, CA 92647 {{UttTT`:GTO;,i 87ACH , CA 92647 LOS ANCELES CA 9Gn4 . 195-051.-07 19 5-0�3-06 195 -0 71-13 '*.FLEE-SHALON BIGMAN DAVID LAHZEL RUDOLF PREIJFRS 6062 LARCHWOOD DRIVE 14901 VANCFARD LANE 6303 WILSH:RE BLVD. 11UNTINGTON BEACH , CA 92647 HUNTTNCTON REACH , CA 92647 LOS ANGELES , CA 90048 195-051-08 213-053-07 195-073- 13 A'IDA POR'TE.-NIVVE VIRGtRIA RZLCLTCKT RAUL RI'3EP# 14911 VANCUARD LAVE 17071 RIRIZAT t ANE 6001 GURTEL' DRIVE HUNT I NCTOR BEACH . CA A 2 6 4 7 yv r T 11LAClt CA 92649 HIJNTINfi=N BEACH, CA 92647 igS-051-57 cH�x�t AHrtxsoR o"AN ''USAN MAYS 1 a, RR110E BOESIgn 14312 $PA DRIVE ( _ ,' 4301 FPA DRIVE .4411 SPA DKrVR Vpp9N5 jC,T0H BEACH CA 9-1647 JUNTINCTON BEACH . CA 91547 EjUNTY'tC?Ow 7ZACH , CCA92Q 'C� ?-•n: 9S•.185-0'�. '� � 95- 195-1w HFCTOR VAZQttEZ EUGEN'r". .tESA ROBERT TSAAC 14322 - SPA DRIVE 14311 SPA '.',RIVE 14421 SPA DRIVE KITNT .NGTON BEACH , CA S 647 Ht7NTTNCTON BEACH , CA 92647 HUNTINCTGN BjeACH , CA 9261 195-182•-Oti 195- 195-04 195-195- 15 CENEVA POWELI. ;ARv MILLER ?IORBE1 T KRAMER 14332 SPA uvivE 14321 SPA DRIVE 14431 qPA DRIVE HUNTINGTON BEACt1, CA 92647 ?IU?iTINC:'0!%' BEACH , CA S 2 6L ' 4E,,CH , rA 9264 195- 182-09 195- 185-0` 195- 191-16 LESLIE SELZGHANJ OKE'i FERRELL FECCY VAM 1' 41.►:ENBURr.Ei 14352 SPA DRIVE 14331 SPA DRTVE 1. 4441 SPA UPIVE HUNTINGTON BEACH , CA 9:647 :tt1lirr GTON BEACH , CA 9761, 7 1ilfttTT%#r.rOS 3!:ACH , CA 92f.,4 195-183-04 ! 95- 113 -06 19S-I3S-11 FRANK BLANSI ",D ROBERT BOLLARD CI,Irrox EDC.ERLY , 4162 SPA DR. . E 14341 QPA DRIVE 177RR `fANTEZ+'?!A CIRCLE HUNTINGTOM BEACH , CA 92647 HUNTI`l TON BED -if , CA 92o4 i 101INTA?N VALLEY , CA 01108 lye- L83-%S 195- 185-07 ROBERT FINE`.LY NIrl;AFI. CORMACY: LF0 a VICTORIA CURTIS t.457 ? SPA DFTVE 14351 SPA DRIV► 5522 DQLLAN DRIVE HUNITNGTON BEACH . CA n?6147 VU'NTrzrTONi BF.ACFf CA 92W 11UNTI2NGTON BEACH , CA 4276 195- 183-06 195- 195- 02 i �+ 5- 195-I1 i SAMM': GALI.O DAVTn EWELL STAN !t00RE REALTY NC . 14392 SPA DRIVE 141AI SPA TIRTVF 705E kESTMTNSTFR AVENUE HUNTINGTON BEACH , Ca 9:647 H1,'%fTTsCTO'., BEACH . CA 920;47 WESr4TNSTER , Ci, 9268 195- 184- 02 195- 155-09 195 - 195- 12 DONNA CURITZ TACK F- RAN1Y. Ci'Y KIMBRGUG3 14402 SPA DRIVE 14381 SPA DRTVF 14472 SPA DRIVE HUNTINGTON BEACH , M 92647 NU?ITTN<<;TO?t ?SE,+ CIi , CA 9-16 + 7 11UNTINGTON BEAC1401 CA 9264 195- 1e4-03 195 - 185 - 10 195- 195- 13 1 i DAVID `SOORE RAY STEVENS PONAI.h HeAURECAR10 � 4713 ADENHOOR AVE . 14381 SPA DRIVI. 3454 41ILLED STPEET LAKEWOOD , CA 90713 HUNT?NGTUlt BEACH , CA 92647 DOFTNI~Y , CA 4024 195-184 -04 195-1__ I1 195--195-14 f HIC'fAEL IfICKES SA411EL STEPHENS CEOR^E LFS 14281 SPA DRIVE 14391 SPA DRIVE 7. 1871 WOODLEA tANE .IVNT' 1iGTON LEACH , CA 92h47 HUNTTNCTON. BEACH , CA 9260 HUNTINCTON BZALN . CA 92640 195-%85-01 195-185- 12 195-195-15 LOREN NEEL`: M"XAXI A INhZX J CUPTA SI1714ZY VVIILIN 3303 1CSTE AVE, 14401 SPA t`RIVE 5561 SPA DXZVE ;,own BEACH , CA 90808 Huvili aroN muxH , CA 926477 Rt MMOTON REIIC-A , CA 9264 ; t9S-IDS- t ) 19S-19S-1a y.T;w.T....;e+'n•r;,;9PR�� ` Co •.r.• - ,.",. Iw,rtr.-, , ":'.TR9A^Ry... __—.�....._. �•------- KAREN PETERSON rt�S00 LEE 5(�� JOHN SFAFFORD 3312 CHARRING CROSS '" >181 VTCTORI�C PLACE 5292 CHARING C1041S RAA11 WESTMINSTER , CA 92683 WESTMINS`FR , CA 925e':- WESTMINSTER , CA 92683 195-422-77 175- 423-05 195-423-42 RUTH CUMMINGS SHERRY SWky NF.RMA"! KEH:S 5316 :'PARING CROSS RAAD 5186 VICTORIA PLACE 1?96 CHARINC CROSS PnAb WESTMINSTER , CA 92683 WESTI(INSTE► , CA 92683 WESTMINSTER , CA 97t83 195-422- 78 195-41- 3-06 ).9ti.-41. 3 -43 30SF.Pii MAGCI0 RI CTIARD SPERO RAvMOND AATTI E 2661 BEL`lONT CANYON 43S EUCLTn STREET c325 VICTORIA PLACE SEIvONT , CA . 94002 SANTA `SONI � A , CA 90402 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 1.95-422-79 19 5- 3-0 7 195 -423-44 R11BY FISHE% WILLTA,4 LA` DER DONALD MAC KENZIE 5176 FICCADT I.LY CTRCT.E 5200 7TCTORIA P ( ACF 5311 VICTORIA PLACE WESTMINSTER , CA 9268 ) WEST!!TIISTER , CA 9 683 WESTMINSTER , CA 92683 195-.422- 80 195-423 -•39 145 -423-45 WESTMINSTER VILLAGE BnZTDAR NIK01.11C r •I p,rt'!, RF ELKt .�5 2nO6 LA1JSON LANE 5202 VICTnRTA PLACE 170 'CALF: LANE. HUNTI `tGTO`t BEACH , CA 92646 1rrST`lI`J5T'F.R , CA 9=683 5FAI. EEACH , CA 90740 195-422•- 81 IoS - 423-09 195 -423- 46 WESTMINSTER V. LLACE TE;, ESA [:ARTi.AN?1 `lII.3'011 TiinMl'SUt; 20062 LAWSON LANE j 1106 VICTORIA PT.AC F 476 EAST vALF Lone HUNTIINGTON BEACH , ('A 92!346 W!STMT!4(;-v-R , CA 92683 7f%XINF 9 CA 92714 195- 422- 82 1 ? 5--423- 1 () 195-423-47 WESTMINSTER VTI.LACE A11.L rU'ECE JAMES Vil ..q{: 70062 LAWSON' LASE 5212 VrCT0'3TA PLACE 5105 VICTORIA PLACE HUNTINGTON BEACH , CA 92646 WFST.4Iss'rrR , Cry 926 ,93 ►iEST"INSTER , CA 92683 1. 95- 522-85 195-423- 11 195 - 423-48 ' CWENDOLY`i WII I T AK17P PAt.,i, !SOLE WIttIAM 801:K!TGER 5162 VICTORIA PLACE 5216 ': I CTORIA PLACE 5811 AMARO T)RIVE WESTMINSTER , CA 92683 WESIXIti5TER. CA Q 2 6 A 3 SAN nIEC:O , CA 92, 124 195-423 -Ot 195-423 - 1 195-4'23-49 ALAIN RAYCI'D 7TNCF.`7Z0 CA,XARATA MILTON SCHOOF 51.66 JICTOPIA PLACE i222 ,ICTORTA PLACE 5:91 VICTORIA Pt, WESTMINSTER , CA 92683 WESTMINSTER , CA 02683 WESTMINSTER, CA 9 2 6 Z 3 195-423 -04 195- 423- 13 195-423 - So HOWARD SEIFF MARK Li FRANCES SCOTT 4324 HA7ELNU: AVENUE 5225 VICTORIA PtACF. 5285 VICTORIA PLACE SEAL BEACH „ CA 90740 WESTY74. STER, CA 92693 WESTMINSTER,, CA 92683 195- 423-03 195-423-1.4 195.423-51 JRANNETTE WILLIAMS RUSSELL SUTCH ,II0I 1 H SYMONS 17965 ARDOLADA WAY 14421 SUFrOLK STREET 5291 VICTORIA PLACt TUSTMe CA 92680 VESTHIMSTER , Cw 92683 wisTMINSTZKY CA 9268x 143-423-C4 195-423- 15 195-421-52 c Altll. � NACbtT ,.JORN AM?dt �j S371-8PA DRITY �'r«t 3'. :� ,l btYVR 5 l.0 . BOX 837 tUNTINCTON IXACR CA 9244`3• �� 'I fill, MIDWAY CXTY CA 92if� r !1 BEACR , CA 9.. r 195-�q5-17 >,9S a o; 145-x22-14 NON i MARIA LAKCtIEIY rRANZESCO I-CONBRUN! RnBERT NEDEIROS 5581 SPA DRIVE 5342 SPA DRIVE 5631 SPA DRIVE HUNTINGTON BEACH , CA 92647 HUNTINCTON REACH , CA 92647 HUNTINCTOK StACPH , CA 926 195- 195-18 1,95-196-08 195- 212- 15 J VICYC A -IAVID HARRI`iGTON WILLIAM ROBACK 16857 BAYVIEW 1448I SPA DRIVE 5621 SPA DRIVE. SUNSET BEACH , CA 90742 HUNTINGTON BEACH . CAS 92647 ttUNT'NCrn;� 8L«4r.H CA 9264 I95-•I95�1 �1 1�35- Igo-O�� 195-212-16 `!A':-CHOW `IA DONALD BURT JEAN VTD!fAN 30806 CASILTNA nRIl'F. 501 LACUNA PLArI: RA"dCHO PALf3SE F.% RDS , CA SEAL BEACH , CA 90740 5622 SPA DRIVE Ht,hTi ?iCTU`i tlZrACV , CA 92667 90274 195 - 1q6-11) 195-213-01 195-195-20 JOHN ARREDONDO YASIII{Itz0 SitIRAKAWA1 CHUPGIH ORIENT�.I, 5611 SPA DRIVE 148D1 PACIFIC AVE . I29 3660 S . GRAMERCY PLACE H►1NfINC:TON BEACH{ , CA 92647 BALDWIN PARK , CA 91706 LOS ANGELES , CA . 90018 195- 195- 21 195- 196 - 11 195-213--V2 `lARTON ANnERSEN THOMAS MADDEN LUCTLt JONES 3612 SPA DRIVE 14451 SPA DRIVE 610 GCFAN AVENUE HUNTINCTO`i BEACH , Ca 926,:7 PUNTTNCTO`7 PEACH , CA 9274 . SEAL REACH{ CA 90740 � 195-196-01 195- 196-12 1°5-213-43r WILLIE WEBB RTCHARD Rl?:7n JULIAN CRYDER 3601 3PA DRIVE 570: SPA t'RT71'. HUNTINGTON BEACH , CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BFACHt , GU CA 92f47 6410 R CET VALLEY CIRCLE 195- 146-02 1� 5-? ; 2 -09 i•'v ? CITY , CA 90230 i95-213-0 qLPO SO S CL. RA C �f ARCO HAZEL ClO ER CARP b SANURA COERIYC 5592 SPA DRIVE 5691 SPA nRrVE HVNTING70.'i BEACH , CA 92647 HUNTI`iGTON REACH , CA 9 .1647 5672 NGT N BE Ii tfuhrTVCrurr BEACH , CA 9264] lq5- 196-03 195-212- 10 195--213 -05 ALCG- PROPERTIES CECIL SHEETON DANTEL ORKAS 2800 28TH STREET 5681 SPA URTVF. S682 SPA DRIVE SANTA CA 90405 HUNTTNGTGN ISEACH , CA 92647 HUNTIYr.TON BEACH . CA 9264 1. 95•-196-04 1 ?1. 2- 1I 195-213-•06 FRANZESCO I,EO`IBRUNI wrLLIAM NENLS JOHN ALKANZA 5572 SPA DRIVES 5671 SPA DRIVE 5692 SPA DRIVE MUNTrRGTON REACH , CA 92647 HUMTINCTOK REACH , CA 92647 HUNTINGTON IFACR CA 92647193 -196�-0 S 19'1-?12-1: 2 9•5-21 3-07 � SOAK PARR LARRY VAN TILIlURC BONNIE *ARAr. I 5562 SPA DRIVE 5661 SPA DRIVE N11AT2wCT4M aEJICN , CA q.r�i7 Rt►11T'I}fCTCK D SUCH CA 92647 5702 SPA BAC RUNTINGTON 9RACNF CA 926471 f�'3 �'RR QR I�s �12 I3 l0'x--�33�►�� _ _ _ _ •�""Rn1��L�.T.��i�T- - 8.L�71f �SE� . �� ,IUAll 'ALARCOW 3712 litA bRI'9S r"1372 S�PA DRIVI ( Sf 21 SPA DRIVI �� NRNTINGTION 22AC119 CA 926 ', .sUMTINGTON REACH , CA 9240RUNTINCT'ON ARACR ,. CA 92#41 1!S-Z13-C9 ".. ' I4s -Z13-1q - 19s-2t.4-09 .IOHIi plILMAN VIEDRICK SPENCER SHAKE lomES INC. $722 SPA DRIVE 5832 SPA DRIVE 5911 SPA DRIVE. HUNTINGTON BRACH , CA 926 i7 11UNTTNGTON BEAC110 CA 92647 1111NTTNGTON BEACR , CA 92641 195-21 :�-10 195- 213 -20 195-214-10 SHANE HOMES TNC. • Lr_i'RENCF HILLER IVAN HANNE?AAN 5732 SPA DRIVE 5342 SPA DRIVE 5831 SPA DRIVE HUNTINGTON BEACH , CA 97647 HUNTINGTON BFAr'i . CA 92647 HUNTINGTON ;3EACH. CA 92647 195- 213- 11 19 �- 213--21 195-214 - 10 AKSELMO 7.U4, IGA NORMANI OWENS EARL STRI0CLAND 5732 SPA DRIVE 5731 SPA D1tIVF 14501 CALNEVA LANE. }'UNTYyGTnN $FAC11 , CA Q264 7 TTUN�TT14CTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH , CA 92647 195-213-11. 195-214 -01 195- 214-11 SUIRLEY FURLONG DIARY FORTIS; ,ITCHAEL SANDS 5742 SPA DRIVE 5741 SPA DRIV1' 5962 CROUPIER DRIVE. HUNTrNCTON BEACH , CA 9 ? 647 1!UN;T'T`;rTf)N BEACH CA C+2647 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 195-213 - 12 195 - 214-02 195-231 -01 WESLEY SMITH C1! TF 'ErB ALIMONrTE MARSELLA 5712 SPA DRIVE 5 ` 51 Sl'A DRIVE 11520 S . CEDAR AVE , HUNTINGTON BEACH , CA 92647 1i{!N;TT.%(,,T0N+ uFACH , CA 92164i' HAWTHORNS , CA 90250 195-213-13 195 -21 4 -0? 19 3 1-0 ALBERT OPAYZ LAWREN.'CE I'RA:'Z' !ACK CHA"' I. P. 5431 KENWOOD AVENUE 57161 SPA DRIVE: 5942 CROI!PIE:R DRIVE BUENA PARK , Col 90621 1Tt"3TTYc;Tv."J N?i:�tr!i , ( � 9'�6y7 11UNTINC:TO`� BEACH . CA 92647 195--213 - 14 IQ5- 214-04' 145-2?2 -03 JOHN PALKA CHARLE:S (;ARCT : .11FLEN CADOTTE 5772 SPA DRIVE 5771 5 P A DREl, r 14472 S.AHARA LANE HUNTINGTON BEACH , CA 92647 1{LtN;TT",'G-s0N BEACH . CA 92647 !IU;�TINir►TON "LACH , CA 92647 195 -213- 1 .3 195 -21. 4 -05 195- 231 -04 JOSEPH BARTOLON E JULIA LESNIESKI DEPT OF VETS AFFAIRS 9334 FLLCKER AVENUE 50781 SPA DRIVE 14492 SAHARA LANE FOUNTAI!I VALLEY , CA 97708 HUNTT4GTON BEACH , CA 92647 41INTINCTONi BEACH , CA 92647 195-213- 16 195-214 -06 195-231 -G5 ATGUK4 KOBAYASHI HARVEV BILLS ROGER SOLLER 3792 SPA D►�!'.E 5801 SPA DKrvE 14492 SA3ARA LANE NUKTINC.TON BEACH , CA 92647 HUNTINGTON !EACH , CA 92647 HUNrTNCTON WEACH . CA 9264? 195-? 13-17 195-214-07 Ly;-231-05 . LL-ARKE FINTLAND GLEiIN JON6S JllbtTH PA1[r'SEAU 1717 r.F.HSTVIZV 3811 SPA DRIVE 5622 BRTGNTO N PRIVE ORAL SGACR, Ch 90740 RUNTINGTON BRACR , CA 92647 MUllTIPICT'ON 32AC8 CA 92441 195-21�-tt 195-214-OS 195-231-06 fiii�fifA4>� ■REVrrC >:OM O�I'SR CM1tCR � 1 5 -* JtAOM! sCSVLTZ . ,S941 'M ORT CIRCLE .�►1, 4442 Tzmt..rCO I AD � 14333 lf-ACiMOL 4049 Som 190TINC'T01 SZACR. CA 9 2 6;.,,._` • KtSTMI X3TCk, CA 9?6 Tr�'3THINS TRR 0 CA 193-Z31-r07 19 5-414 -73 195- 422-48 CRARLES MC GROARTY JOAN VON 1,OSsnrma ARTHUR ROARPrSON 59S1 NUGGET CtRCt.E 59SI NUGGET I�CtRCACRI CA 92647 5175 VICTORIA PLACE 14341 S . BLACKPOOL XnAD RUXT195-23 TON WES"MINSTER , CA 92683 WESTMINS'TER , CA 92683 195••4 14- 74 19 5-422-49 RA'LPH DURAN RA'�MONn BtArKMAN I'�,UI. � F1EV}:R1 'i ? }'EIrEFt 5961 NUGGE: Cl -AXLE 5171 VICTORIA PLACE HUNTINGT04 BEACTI CA 92647 51R1 �' 1CT0}2TA PLACEWi ST`lTNSTEA CA 92683 195-231 -09 ►JEST` IANSTFR , CA 92oP, 3 195-422 - 30 195-IIL- 75 I WTI,LIA`( GOLIFF FlIA3CI S !RFA ruFD HA!IF A581 EMERSON CTRCI. E 11 AI. � 5365 VICTORIA PLACE 519 VICTORIA PLACE ,.ARDEN GROVF CA �9_2641, WESTMI`iSTER CA 92683 195 -231-18 � WFST!�irti'S�' iiR , CA 92f;�3 19S -L22-St 19;-41 <<- 7G MARGARET SI) RDOCK }I_TF. R Mr. r,RArl ii KE INETtl CREEK 14491 SAHARA LANE 5191 VICTORIA PLACr 5361 VTC7rRlA PLACE HUNTTNCTON BEACH , CA 92647 WFST`,!1 !13TFR, CA 92681 WESTMINSTEF , CA 9?6F.3 195-231- 19 195- 1414 •- 77 195-422 - 52 MICHAEL PAWSE. m,,Ros, rRF MA'i` E LEWIS RAYWARD 144711 SAH %RA Lk%F. 13020 C..AMTSTTO DIA. ROCT 5355 VTr'IOk!A 'I LACE HUNTTNGTON BrACII , CA 9? f,47 DF.I.' MAR , t:1% 92014 WEST`iINSTER , CA 92683 195- 231--23 l%) 5-414 - 78 195-422-53 STIABIR BATA, WFSTHTUSTER VILi_AG'K ANTIFF.W JONF5 950 W. LAMBERT RD . 127 20062 L WSO;i LANE 5131 CIJARTNr, CROSS LA HABRA , Ca r0631 }{L'NTI `i.T0N' BEAC11 , CA 92646 WEST.4TNSTER , CA 92683 195-231 - 21 195- 414 - 95 195-4 ::' - 54 JO`C'E: VAN TILBORC. WF.STN jN%"NT }:R V T1.1.AGF. HERBERT NORT ON 14492 CALNEVA LA.4F 1.0062 LAtwSONI LAINE 532i CHARINC CROSS ROAD HUNTI:ICTON BFACff , CA '4264 ; BEACtt , CA 92646 WESTMINS►EP , CA 92683 195- 211-22 I135- 41 : - 9h I95- L2?-55 C►ER:ILDINfE DEARDF.UrF CHARLES STOOPS R11'ri{ RrCIIARDS 14501 CALN!VA LANE 14321 BLACKPOOL ROAD W!T 5321 CHARING CROSS ROAD HUNTINGTON BEACH . CA 9?647 WESTNSI_'iST'F:R, CA 92683 WESTMINSTER , CA 92683 195-231 -23 195- 422-45 195-422 - 56 i G WINN PATRICYA SACH CHARLES WLLSON 14502 CALNEVA LANE 14325 BLACKPOOL ROAD 5302 CHARING CROSS ROAD HUNTIOGTON BEACH , CA 92647 WESTMINSTER , CA 92683 Wi:STxrXSTtR , CA 92683 � 195-231-23 195-422-46 195- 422 -75 DONALD KrNGSBURY STUART WILKENING KING-WAlf LAVIIDES i 14432 BAKER STREET 12400 E . tMPEiRTAL HWY. 5306 CMARTX: CRASS ROAD WRSTNINSTER , CA 92683 WORWALK, CA , 90650 WESX' NSTRR, CA 92663 i9S•4i4-01 195-422-47 193w422 ,J6 jj lit WrM!$ E. Mt l l!mu • 14471 Chateau Lmw Hunt Ingt.on beach, CA 92647 A.P. 195-071-22 Joseph Phan • 5431 Harold Place Q Whmt i ngton Beach, CA 92647 A.P. 195-181-07 y Jerry W. Lytton 5442 Harold Place Huntington Beach, CA 92647 A.P. 195- 182-04 ik, Theodore J. E.+elIen StMirt. H. Liber 5422 Harold Place 5431 StardusL Or. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 .r' 6 A.P. 195- 182-06 A.P. 195082- 10 Ralph H. SeebalC Robert W. Lorentz i � 6303 Wilshire 5lvd . 5462 Stardust 0r. f -��;•.. Los Angeles. CA 90048 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 A.P. 195- 182-11 A.P. 195- 133-02 Larry Jacobson James R. Broker 14442 Chateau Lanz_ 144A 1 Danes C i ►•-:l e Huntington Seacti . CA 9254; lluntingten Beacn, CA 92647 A.F. 195-072- 16 A.P. 195-072-25 y ; Thong Do Tho-mas ThornalI 14972 Sabre Lane 6092 Sherman Or. Huntington Beach, CA 92W Huntington Beach, CA 92647 A. P. 195-051 -S-1 A.P. 145-053-10 I I i F Itotdolph J. Scott Randolph J. Scott Keith E. Dayton 5471 Tangiers Dr. 5471 Tangiers or.t 5542 Dollar Or. Huntington Beach, CA 9254T Harlington Beach. CA 926d 7 Huntington Beach. CA 9 M I A. P. 195-183-07 A. P. 195-183-07 A.Q. 195-195-09 Thomas S. C. Lee Thomas S. C. lee Dwight A. 8orses 5502 Targiers Dr. 5502 Tangiers Or. 8597 Rockfish Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Fountain Valley, CA 92647 A.P. 195-184-01 A.P. 1%-184-01 A.P. 195-212-01 Howard J. Schurnn Ncward J. Schunrr Raymond J. Shaeffer 5622 Nevada Dr . 5622 Nevada Dr. 5642 Nevada Or. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach , CA 92647 Huntington Beach. CA 12647 'i A .P. 195- 195-01 A .P. 195- 195-01 A.P. 195-?12 .02 i Wilbert D. Smitr Wilbert D. cmith Bertha Cuevas 8212 20th S: . 8212 20th St . 5652 Nevada Or. Westminster, CA 92647 Westminster, CA 92647 Huntington Beach. CA 92647 A.P. 195-195-02 A.P . 195-195-02 A.P. 195-212-03 Chris Bourland Chris Bourla nd Robert L. Honeycu U� 5602 Nevada Dr. 5602 Nevada Dr . 5662 Nevada. Dr . Huntington Beach , CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, Cat 92647 A.P. 195-195-03 A.P. 195-195-03 A.P. 195-212-04 Chan Y. Nguyei Chan Y. Nguyen Victor M. Cutter 559e Nevada Dr . 5592 Nevada Dr. 5672 Nevada Dr. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Hr:nLington Brach, CI, 92 647 Huntington Beach , CA 92647 A.P. 195-195-04 A.P. 195- 195-04 A.P. 19.5-212-05 Hugh A. McDonnell Hugh A. McDonnel i C72orge Wa; tar R. 5582 Nevada Dr. 5582 Nevada Dr. :;r82 Nevada. Dr . Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach , CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 926-47 A.P. 195- 195-05 A.P. 195- 195-05 A. P . 19E-212-06 Michale la Pointe Michale La Pointe Robert Culliton 5572 Nevada Dr. 557? Nevada Or. 5692 Nevada Dr. Huntington Beach , CA 92647 )4untington Beach , CA 926-17 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 A.P. 195- !95-06 A.P . 195- 195-06 A.P. 195-212.07 Arthur Cloninger Arthur Cloninger Woodley Owen Butler Jr . 5562 Dollar Dr. 5562 Dollar Dr. 5702 Nevada Dr. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach. CA, 96647 Huntington Beach, CA 926r: A.P. 195-195-07 A.P. 195- 195-07 A.P. 195-212-0& Thomas rherardini Tharias Gherardini Harvey E. O'Neill 5552 Dollar Dr. 5552 Dollar Dr. 5962. Nugget Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 9260 A.P. 195-195-08 A.P. 195- 195-08 A.P. 19'a-231-10 �Y �+. E4lM33TRt�1 ,,,,,, L I Ma1RL •. Els RtiMN I MG C ILY.LII C,A V:S 1 •i�0 n ►OR. i, i 6012 THOR DRIVZ � 6032 TOM DRIP! 1SNGTON 3ZACN, CA 92647 RnTINGT'ON BEEACH, CA 92647 NUMTIXMP 22ACN, Ch 92647 A.P. MU. 145-361-18 A.P. NO. 145•-361-19 A.P. NO. 145-361-20 ALLXX L. AWELRIN ARNOLD R. ELLIOTT, TRUSTEE: WILT.IAA Jr. CCWAWAY 6042 THOR DRIVE 6052 THOR nRIVE G062 THOR pRZYE HUNTI>NCPON BEACH, CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 927647 HUNTIHGTOR BEACH, CA 92647 A.P. NO. 1.45-361-21 A.P. NO. 145-361-22 A.P. NO. 145-361-23 RICHARD FAULKNER GE:ORGE P . GOUPI L BOBBY A. BARTLETT 6072 THOR DRIVE 6092 TllCR DRIVE 24080 W. ROBERTS HUNTINGTON BEACli, CA 92647 llL'NTItiCT0?i' BEACH, CA 926.17 FRES NO, CA 93711 A. P. NO. 145-361-21 A. P . NO. l •15-361 -25 A.P. NO. 145-361-26 WILLIA!4 H. SAIA, SR. WILLIAM D. CRAIG WILLIM. J . HARTEF., JR. 6102 THOR DRIVE 6112 THOR STREET 6111 THOR DRIVE HUNTI?.:TON BEACH, CA 92647 :�L'NTINGTG!s BEACH, CA 726•47 HUNTINGTON BLNCII, CA 92647 A.P. NO. 145-361-27 A .P. NO. 145- 361-26 A. P . NO. 145-361-29 LUIS PEREZ 1"ALLACK GRANCRCJ;1i DERN Akf) D. DES FORGES, TR. 6101 THOR DRIVE 6091 Tim DRIVE 6081 THCR nRI VEi HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 Hi:!iT1NGTC'!i BEACH , CA `t-647 1IUNTIN-GTON BEACH, CA 92647 I A.P. N0. 145-361-30 A.P. N0. 145-361 -11 A .P. :O. 145-361-32 TOSHIRO BEECH ROBERT CLARK JAMES A REED 6082 ATLAS DRIVE 6092 ATLAS DKI VE 6112 ATLAS DRIVE HUNTINGTOEi BEACH, CA 92647 HUNTINGT012 IiF.A:'111. CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BE.\CH• CA 92647 A.P. NO. 1.45-361-33 A. P. No. 1 .15-36: -341 A.P. NO. 145-361-35 JOHN W. POWELL 41CHAEL F . O' DIII EN VAN M. BARNES 15031 SABRE LANE 1 S-021 S A0PE LANE 6001 THOR DRIVE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 912647 11U`I. I.NG,TG`i SE:ACH, CA 926.17 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92647 A.P. NO. 145-361 -36 ;,.P. NO. 1:!:-la1 -31 A. P. NO. 145-364-03 ROBERT F . WILTON 140iiERT I: . AUTR': MARY E. PAIIGONIS 6011 rim DRIVE: 6031 THOR DRIVE 116' ,UU ;iUGE?4T DRIVE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647, ll' NTIN:GTG!: BE;iCH, CA 9-647 GRANADA HILLS, CA 91344 A. P N0. 145-364-0; A. P. NO . 145 -364-05 A.P. NO. 145-364-06 BYRON J. TATTI JILMES L . HILL STANLEY T. NIITSUEKA 6051 THOR DRIVE 15071 APOLLO LAME 15061 APOLLO LANE: HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 HUNTINGTON r. ACII, CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 A.P. NO. 145-364-07 A.P. N.O. 145-2,ii-08 A. P. NO. 145-364-09 RAYMOND D. DASCENZO WILL1E 9. ANDERSON ET AL ROGER S . JUE 6329 MANTOVA STREET 15031 APOLLO LANE 8381 CARNZGlt AVZWUE LONG SCACN, CA 90815 HUWTING'TVN BEACH, CA V2647 WZ$771INSTWt CA 92643 A.P. M0. 145-364-10 A.P. No. 145-364-•11 A,P. NO. 145-364-12 _ __ T__. .arr.r..u- ..w-...r.r w.. .. Y R. '�71i11MiwZ No 11ALINM 2. PP.A TTR FRAX CI S L. 11C Alt,l= "71 ATLAS DRIP! �'{"'' 6081 ATLAS DIIIVR 6091 ATLAS Dalvit ■wfiTtM0'!"Oil DrAcrr CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACIl, CA 92647 HUNTINOTOM NEACM, CA MO A.P. NO. 145-364-13 A.P. WO. 145-364-14 A.P. NO, 145-364-15 JAMBS A. FZRLITA WILLIAM F. BUSH GERTRUDS L. MC PRAI1, 6042 DOM AVENUE 15052 SPRINGDALE STREET 6061 GLENWOOD DAM FAXILY f4RALTH CENTER HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 MVNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 A.P. NO. 145-364-18 A. P . NO. :-15-164-19 A.P. NO. 195-011-05 RICHARD K . ROBERTS 905ENDO RODRIGUEZ DOUGLAS WILSON 3432 BRAVATA DRIVE 6081 GLENWOCD DRIVE 6091 GLENWOOD DRIVE ATINTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH, MCA 92647 A.P . NO. 195-011-06 A.P. 110. 195-01. 1 -07 A .P. No. 19s-0111 -09 R08-"ftT L. BTIRLEY JA.MES MONRISON CARL % IL.MAII 6101 GLENWOOD DRIVE: 6111 GLENti000 DRIVF: 5'70I MIDDLECOF'E DRIVE HUNTINGT011 BEACH, CA 9264 ' fi(:21,It:GTUN 1'E:F.CEt, CA 92647 11UN;IN:GTON BEACH, CA 92647 i A.P. NO. 195-011-09 A. P . NO. 195-011-10 A. P . 11140. 1.95-011-11 E. CLARKE STEPHENS CLAUS G. r.1:INS STt.VEU K. 74110E 6131 GLENWOOD DRIVE: 6141 GLENWOOD Dilly : 6151 GLENWOCU DRIVE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 9-16.17 HUNT I I i G O11 3r.ACFI, C:, 92647 f(UN71UGTON BEACH, CA 92647 A.P. NO. 195-011 -12 A .P. NO. 195-^11 -13 A.P. NO. 195-011-1.4 ... , ,. JA.MES Aii:FiOltY 'TCk,,..S ?Q13F:k : R. : I.»��F:R DC�..ALD W. GRAY 6101 IVORY CIRCLE 6091 IVORY CIRCLE 3 . 75 W 168TIf STREET HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 91647 HU!til'tGTC!; BEACH. CA 9i.t7:7 TORRANCE, CA 90504 A.P. NO. 195-031-01 A. P . ti0. 195-C31 -02 A.A . NO. 195-031-03 i STEVEN EVANS RONALD i+. OF: LAO JEFRY MC COR.MICE 6071 IVORY CIRCLE 6051 IVORY CIRCLE 60782 IVORY CIRCLE: HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92E47 bEACH, Lr• 92t i 7 HL'NTI N'r-T'1?; SCACH, CA 92647 A.P. NO. 195-031-04 A .P. NO. 195-031 -05 A .P. NO. 195-031 -15 HARRY W. MC CVS?:-r'R SAUTE{ PACIFIC PR(:P ; :IFS . OHN A. MILLER 6082 IVORY CIRC-LE ATTN . IRI':A BllFF:Nt A'i:S; RITA DRE:EN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 926.17 6303 I;ILSfifRE fiL:'D. 6303 WILSHIRE BIND. LO S AN:;F:,E S , CA 900.18 LOS ANGELES. CA 90046 A.P- N0. 195-031-16 A. F. NO. 195-031-17 A. P. NO. 195-031-17 SON NHUT I.4T K R014ALD R. ORG I LL LOLA F. NORTON 6102 IVORY CIRCLE 6101 ..TALE CIRCLE 162361 SILVER LANE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 9.2647 HUNTINGTON SnACH. CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH, C1 92647 1� A.P. NO- 195-031-16 A.P. NO. 195. 031-19 A .P. NO. 05-031 -20 HARRY J. CARLSON JOIIN W. DAVIES, JR. JAMES W. WRAY 17921 OLDGLEN LANE 6071 JADE CIRCLE 6062 JADE CIRCLE UVNTINGTOR BEACH, CA 92647 HUNTINGTON REACH, CA 92647 HUNTINGTON AZACli, CA 92647 4 A.P. N0. 195-03.1-21, A.P. NO. 195-031-22 A.P. 90. 195-031-32 { Dec Olitg of Westminster P CIVIC CENTER $200 WESTM04S'?ER BOULEVARD i WESTWINSTER. CALIFORP41A OnS3 714 CODE M-3311 ! L ir June 13 , 1990 - x r. L.� n ~ .4 l'7 y+ ' cx ri►+�i Mr. Merle Pautsch c Sr. Vice President . McDonnell Douglas Realty 18881 Von Karmen , #1200 Irvine, CA 92715 SUBJECT: $100 , 000 Payment for, Traffic Mitigation for "Twin Towers" Dear Mr. Pautsch: Enclosed is a "Statement of the Actiot, of the City Council." of the City of Hunti..^,gten Beach which approve& the expenditure of { $1000 000 toward the improvement of the Garden Grove: Boulevard/Bolsa Ch.ica Road/405-22 Freeway area , with payment made by McDonnell Douglas directly to our city. We will be expecting the payment as soon as possible. IZ you have any questions , please contact me on extension 209. Sine+rely, PUBLIC k-ORKS DEPARTMENT Engineering Division I Leer, Vestal Public Work: Director cc: Robert Young, President City of Huntington Beach i VIA CERTIFIED MAIL : I AL Ulm A WAM--!MW t, .7 1a��1tllitllStl`t' i + V1a �,? ., Q.Z '� a, WW MST%MSrrcR OOULEVAJ40 a WESTMINSTS1 CALWOROAM SOW City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main St. PO Box 190 Huntington Beach, L'A 92648 of 3ffieatmffiste CIVIC CENTER 8200 WESTMINSTER BOULEVAFAU WESTMINSTER. CALIFORNIA 92683 214 CODE 698 �`311 June 7 , 1990 Mr. Merle Pautsch Sr. Vice President McDonnel Douglas Reali:'y 18881 Van Kai-aen, #12G0 Irvine, CA 9:1715 SUBJECT: $100, 000 Payment for Traffic Mitigation for "Twin 'rowers" Dear Mr. Pauts%;h: 'r we have been crying to reach you by telephone and have been unable to receive a reply. Since the Huntington Beach City Council approved the pa yment nt of S100, U00 by your company to the City of Westminster at its May 7, :990 meeting in compliance with the conditions of approval of the first phase of the "Twin Towers" development, we are hereby requesting art imediate payment to our City. Please contact me on extension 209 for an approximate date of when we can expect the payment . Sincerely, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Engineering Livisi;jn (:%_ U tA Don Vestal Fu.%ilic Worka Directoi DV/vas cc: Robert Young, President City of Huntington Peach IPAXED ON June 7 , 1990 1 �s P.L y�7-►:t y,l,la Via Certified M6 i 1 r~^ REQUEST FOR CITE' COUNCIL. ACTION - ti Date May 7, 1990 Submitted to: ' Honorable Mayor and City Council r Subrn'"Od by: Michael T. Uber-:aga, City Administfator Preparod by: Louis F. Sandoval, Director of Public Works APPROVED nY CITY Subject: MCDONNELL DOUGLAS TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENT FEE h CITY ronsistent with Council Policy? ( } Yes ( } Now Pr,licw or ExcWtion Stat•nont of Issue, Recommnerxiation, Analysis, Fyndinq Sour". Altwnstive Actions, Attach~ts: 41 5 1$TEMY&i Ol~ U%'=: The City of Westminster has identified a candidate project for traffic improvement toward which they wish to apply the financial contribution required of the McDonnell Douglas office tower project. $ECQNMENDADQN: Approve the expenditure of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) toward the Improvement of the Garden Grove Boulevard/Bolsa Chica Rosidl405-21 Freeway area, authorize the payment to be made by McDonnell Douglas directly to the City of Westminster and direct the Director of Community Development to obtain from the City of Westminster verification of the payment as described. At its February 16, 1988 regular meeting, the City Council placed Conditions of Approval on the office tower project to be constructed on McDonnell Douglas ptgwrty at the Northeast corner of Balsa and Bolsa Chica. Among those conditions was Number 13, which outlined the obligation for a financial contribution rat to exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) to be applied toward traffic improvements. Subsequently, Council and staff representatives frur., both cities met to evaluate the traffic issues involved. Although several potentiai candidate projects were Identified, mutual agreement on the precise lncasion(s) or the needed amount for each location was not achieved. However, the participants did cgrec that the contribution would best be applied toward one significant project rather than •raking marginal partial contribution: toward smaller projects. The City of Westminster has been preparing plans for the Improvement of the Interchange between the xZ (Garden Grove) and 405 (San Diego) freeways and the surface streets of Bolsa Chica Road/Valley View and Garden Grove boulevard. The funding for the project Is from OCUTT funds (Orange Courr.-y Unified Transportation Trust) and matching city r funds. The $100,0W contribution Is needed to complete the local match for the pro*t. t S f 'r Mom 1 McLNxuiell Douglas Traffic cmn. Fee May 7, I990 Page 2 Sluce the proposed project is regional in nature, providing improved surface street and freeway mobility for all the residents and bus;nesses in '_ u area, staff sup,,orts the propmal arxi the application of the McDonnell Douglas financial contribution toward the needed project match. SJHMK! r MRCE: Not applicable (no city funds). ALT NAMT. ACMN: Give alternative direction fo;r the expenditure of the $100,000.00 from McDcnnel Douglas. UACEM S : I. Letters, C;t} of Westminster 2. Conditions of Approval, February 16, 198°. MTU:LFS:HNG:dw 239ag/6&7 o CIVIC CElolf' : 92C1) YWESZMINSTFR 4'Ou"EvArio February 21 , 1990 14ES�MIFJ�,TCR, r 4�lfQR��tf, 9:'5a:j 114 COD' 235-3311 REcC-"& I Mr. Lou Sandoval , Directoi City of Huntington BeacF Public Wo-:ks Department :I 2000 Main St. /PO Box 190 Huntington Beach , CA 92648 Pear Mr. Sandoval : During the past few years, the Councils of trest:ininster and Huntington Beach and representatives from the Westminster village 'Homeowners ' Association have ;yet to discusa the traffic impacts for Westminster: in connection with the McDonnell tkouglas "Towers" project. An extensive list of improvements was developed to mitigate the traffic problems associated with this project , and prior tc the approval of the project bl- the Huntington Beach City Council , our Mayor wrote a lctt:er ( copy attached ) requesting that McDonnel Douglas be required to pay S410 , 000 t-ar mitigation cf traffic s s problems within w�srrnin..ter . It has been out.* undersl- 3nding that the Huntington beach Council required that $ 100 , 000 be made available by McDonnell Douglas fo-• alleviation of traffic impacts in Westminster. Based upon this understanding that $100 , 000 would be available, we set our top priority at Garden Grove Boulevard/Bolsa Chi.ca Road and Garden Grove Boulevard/405/ 22 Freeway ramps fer intersection improvements in connection with the "Towers" project . Capacity will be increased significPntly by the proposed addition of new travel lanes . Vie have: constructi -+n plans for this area and will be using 4CUTr ( Orange County Unified Transportation Trust ) funds for approximately 40% of its construction. Since this project must be aoarded by June 30th , i990 , so that the OCUTT funding will not be loot , we are requesting f100 , 000 for evpenditura on this project. It is quite evident that the McDonnell Douglas "Towers" project will have a serious impact on Garden Grove Boulevard/Bolsa Ghi.rs Road/405 -22 Freeway ramps , in addition to thirteen other signalized intersections ±n the City of Westminster. Not only is increased congestion a prot-letr., but also pavement fatigue which results in shorter infrastructure life. .._ „. �. :.....:..-,, .�....w. ..«..-..c'. r - .,.. :y.:•.-c Twwe--•+.,-s-r.? .nr�IMrrwa.r..►._.. .+w�...� '"I.cr �� Mr . Lou Sandoval. February 21 , 1990 Page Two ' We Are respe4 tfu',.ly requesting that ;our Council appropriate t 10A , 000 for t'01,c: much-needed 0-�:t1Tr project . without your monetary involver,ent, Westminster cannot provide matching :und6 and corsequently, the OCUTT funding will he lost and we will be unable to commence the project. Enclosed for your review are the preliminary construction project plans. We would appreciate: a response to this letter no later than March 1 , 1990 . sincerely, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Don vestal Public Works Director A Neal Thompson Cite Engineer NT/vas enclosures CC." Jerry Kenny, City Manager 1 k t AAS C.�t# of Mrstin "nottr t CIVIC CEO:tfA V X, YVESIMINSTEA BOULEVAPD wES"WIN;1 ER E:is 1FORNIA 926l:, 7 iC CON 1599 3311 Clarks I' SawA August 5, 198B keyer fmart. G. frx Or iwaye► Na rem Aa+s h svt� The Honorable )hn Erskine Mayor City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach , CA 92648 Alff� A. fact Dear John: r 4eacifarp The Westminster City Council requests that McDonnell Douglas p..y $410 , �00 for traffic control devices at the intersections of : 1 ) Westminster Boulevard/Springdale Street , and 2 ) Garden Grove Boulevard/Bolsa Caica Road and the 405/22 Freeway ramps. This request is based on informatickn prestat-sd and discussed at the seven meetings held b;; the McDonnell Douglas Traffic Improvement .Study eomr.;.ttee, whici: is comprised of City Council members from Huntington Beach and Westminster and representatives frvr. tiie Westminster village Homeowners ' Association. The Committee developed an extensive list of improvements needed to iritigate the problems ausoc44tr•d with additional traffic generated by the proposed office buildings at the McDonnell Douglas Astronautics facility in Huntington Beach. The estimw� ,-,d lmplementatirn cast for the !m%--evements Is some S8,000 , d00. Hot ever , we are requeat,ing only alight ly more than 5% of that amount , which we feel is realistic and reasonable . Enclosed are drawings of the two areas showing the improvements which include street/ramp widening, restripi,rg , median modification and removal, new directional signs , and signal upgrading. on behalf of the City of Westminster, I corwend and thank you for your willingness to work with us and look fo.-ward to future meetings of the Committee, where we can address challenges of mutual concern and develop solu`.ions of mutual benefit . Sin erely, Charles V. Smith Mayor sd Attachment Page 13 - Council/Agency Mi n+rte s Z/l yal (3) The trees within the interior of the prof tct site shall be a min;mum of 24" box size. (4) Trees of 15 gallon size or less shall not be utilized in the landscape plan , (5) the Irrigation plan shall include the use of low Angie sprinkler heads along the perimetdr of the site and the use of drip irrigation to interior planters 4 minimize rater runoff . ( 6 ) Phase I landscaping shall irclQde completion of all proposed landscaping along Bolsa Avenue and Balsa Chic& Street . ( 7 ) The surface parking area on the eastern portion of the site r will built where the proposed Phase II parking structure i be bu shall be striped with, landscape planters between opposing lanes of parking stalls . The status of Phase II construction sh&11 be reviewed on an annual basis by the Planning Director to determine if landscape materials shall be installed in the temporary parking area , Landscape shall be installed in the tempnrary parking aret within five years of the dare of approval of this crnditional use permit . d . A comprehensive, permanent set ^t Convenants , conditions and restrictions► covering limitations on the mixed use entitlement including a list of permitted uses and any conditions of approval !or th, a project , and all development, performance , and rlanagemertt Stand&rds shall be sub-pitted for staff review. A recorded copy shall be sutmi tted 'Co the Dew*Vnent of Ccmrrun 1 t; Devaloprnent prior to octu wcy of sny building Aa,',va' for content shall be the respons i bi 1 ! ty of the Cedar tr..ent of Ccnmun i ty Deve lopnent and approval as to fore by the C, ty Attorney. Angie -,*difications to the approved convenants , cenditl �ns and restrictions must be suorritted 160 the City for aooro,eal , e . A parcel niap creating leasable parcels cn the s i te. Said map shall be recorded prior to final inspection and a copy submitted to the Department of Coemmunity Qevelopn�nt . f. Geologist Report . An er-gineering geologist shall be engaged to submit 3 report indicat7ng the ground surface acceleration from earth .novenent for the su*ict property. Ail structures Within this develoNment shall be constructed in compliance with the G-factors as indicated by the geologist ' s report. Calculations for fittings and structural mrembers to withstand anticipated G-factors , small be submitted to the City for review. g . A Silt Control Plan . A plan for silt control for all storm runoff from, the property during construction and during Initial operation of the facilities , submitted to the Department of Public leorks ,or review. S. prior to commencing Above grade construction the applicant shall prepare a Preconstruction Fire Plan , for review er.-a approval of the fire Depart- ment , which guarantees adequate accoss and fire prot+ectlon for a building of this type of construction during all construction ,phases. Page Council /Agency Minutia - 2/16/88 d . Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the Phase I , 8-story Office building the applicant shall construct the following public right-of-way improvements per Public Works standards; a . A 100 foot left turn storage lane for eastbound traffic on Bois& Avenue coming Drum Bois& Chica Street . b. Install 3 trsffic iignai on Bois& Avenue a � the access point to the site 1 ,000 feet east of the Solsa Chica signal . C . The applicant shall be responsible for providing the conduit, cable, and controller hardware necessary to coordinate the traffic signals at the intersections of Springdale &no Bolsa x Graham and Solsa Balsa and proposed pedestrian signal at McDonnell-Douglas entry on Bolsu Balsa and new signal to be provided for this project Balsa and Bolsa Chic& this wi i l require the installation of conduit frace Springdale to BOIS.& Chica . d Construct f. 1!G foot wes'bound left turn pocket on Solsa Avenue beginning approximately 600 feet east of the Solsa Chita Street centerline e . Provide a second access point for O e project along Bois& Avenue with the opening beginning And ending approximately 300 and 355 f feet , respectively, east of Balsa Chica Street centerline . This access point shall be restricttd to right turn only access . f. Construct a median break on Bolsa Chica Street to serve the project entry. The c,edian break shall be designed to allow for southbound left turns into the project , but shall prohibit westbound left turns out of the project . The City r pay, :;aced on traffic studies , 11mit or preclude left-hand turns from Bolsa Chica ( southbound) onto the subject site sucn as by placing "no left-turns" signs dur- ing peak hours . g . Construct a new bars stoc:turnout ,on westbound Bolsa Avenue adjacent to the project slVe and on northbound Bolsa Chica Street . The pre- cise design and location of the turnouts shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department and OCTO. The area adja- cent to the turnouts shall be able to accormodate a Rassenger v% it-. ing area with a bus shelter and bench. A paved, lighted, handicap- ped accessible pedestrian access_.ay shall be provided between the stops and the project bulldinys. g. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for Phase I , g-story office tower, the following requirements shall be fu) fi ) led; a. A planned sign program for the entire development shalt be subsitt- ed to and approved by the Director of Community Deveiopwt. Page i5 - Council /Agw„cy Minutes - 2/16/88 � b. A Transportation System Management Plan (TSM) shall be submitted to and approved by the Olrsztors of the Public Works and Community Development Departments of the City of Huntington Beach. Approval of the TSM Plan by the City shall include consultation with the City of Westminster. The TSM Plan shall include. but not be limited to , the following programs: ( 1 ) Hire a TSM Coordinator for the McDonnell Douglas facilities ( 2) Provide financial incentives for ridesharing ( 3) Provide for flexible or modified work /.ours where feasible ( 4) Provide for preferential parking for vehicles used for ride- sharing ( 5) Provide for video and audio teleconferencing in the work place ( 6 ) Provide a Carpool matching service ( 7) Provide f,;r a vanpool program; McDonnell Douglas shall pur- chase or lease vans to provide to employees who wish to van- pool ( ©) Participate in OCTD matching service j' ( 9) Provide for the sale of monthly OC1D bus passes on-site • ( 10) Provide bicycle facilities on-site ( 11 ) Provide for van shuttle servica between the main office and out-lying offices ( 12) Monitor air quality reports ( 13) ,Resurvey employee traffic patterns of overall McDonnell Douglas facility and provide ' nfcrtation to ACMtD. ( 141, Address the provision of on-site child care facilities for • employees C . All Phase 1 landscape shall be installed including the perimeter setback area along Bolsa and Boisa Chica in Phase II . B . Prior to the issuance of building permits for the Phase II , 12-story office building, or parking structure, the applicant shall submit for review and approval of the Public Works Department an Interim traffic and Narking plan to insure there is adequate parking on-site during Phase II construction. 9 . Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for Phase II , 12-story office building and parking structure, the following require- men ts shall be fulfilled: a . The applicant shall !-onvert the westbound right turn to a through/ right turn lane at the Springdale/Bolsa intersection. b. The .ippl ic.ant shall submit an instrurrent . acceptabie to the Fire Department avid Corrxnunity Oevelopment Oepartment , guaranteeing that an area will be se` aside on the eastern boundary of the parking structure as a fire lane . 10. A 12-inch water vain shall be constructed In Soisa Chica Street from 6olsa Avenue to the project' s northerly boundary. il . All on-site rater mains shall be located within vehicular travelways &nd dedicated to the City. ' o �. Page :-6 - Council /Agency Minutes - 2/16/88 T 12. The applicant shall -epair any damage to Bolsa Avenue or Bolsa Chica Street of damage during Phase I or Phase II construction. This will require the re-paving of the street to its newly paved condition, 13. A traffic improvement study shall he initiated an o e3 by •:ummittee comprised of representatives from, the city of iuntington Beach. Westminster and the Westminster Village residential community, and coax pleted within six months . This stu,:y shalt include but not be limited to •dentifying intersection improvements to both the r.ities of Huntington 3each and Nestmincter, identifying programs and policies to -comply with :he Air Quality Management District guidelines for ma3or employers , an0 ;he Transportation Systems Management Plan as identified in condition number 7 of the conditions of apprrvall . ScOor-nell Douglas shali provide a financial contribution to the City of Huntington Beach for traffic improvement in the amount of their fair share For funding these improve-• nents not to exceed $100,000 the joint committee shall m ke recamenda- .ion for street 'Improvements to the respective cities of Huntington Beach and Westminster. This limitation shall ;nly apply to the physical improvements . The contribution for traffic intersection improvements shall be made prior to first certificate of occupancy and shall be admin- tstered by the Lity of Huntington Beach. Mcdonnell Douglas shall still be required to pay the full amount for implementing any employee related Air Quality Management District mitigation programs . 14 . -he applicant shall be responsible ;or all changes crr additions to street signs , pavement markings and stripings that ire generated by changes due co the requirements of the development. I., Vs' lane on 9 1 .3 hica Street or 8olsa mvenue will be 15 . , o .ra . , ae vs C S► e Gzr,., •. , t_d except by _nN, sal per -tit Issued by the Director of Public Harks. 16 . hater conservaticn measures , such as the installaticri of low flush toi-- lets , low volume snorer heads , turnoff ada;ters , faucet r ;ow control , hot �a ;er recirculation and the use of drought-resistant landscape ma;erlal :hail he in:! uded in the project C?;i .fn . 17 . -he Ci ty` s ; 2--i nch scar m,ji n in Bo sa A-itinue i s presently over loaded. -he aopl i cant sna i l Avert crocosed and/or existing flows to the Graham Street sewer so that tie Bolsa Avenue line will ultimately flow within Ecceptable levels . 18 . Cn_site seiner', shall t;,i private and sized to accomrvdate future flows f r on t'i e north . 19 . riCr to the i s seance -of riui ldin•; permits on the 66 acre McDonnell-Doug- 1: prcp,?-:y located at the northwest corner of Bolsa Averua and Spring- c4le Street , clearance shalt be ootained from the •.,► a.ige Ccunty Sanita- tior District stating that such cevelopment will not adversely impact the sewer systen. Such clearance shall be in the form of a letter to the Cirrrtor of public Works and the Director of Comunity Development . . 20. Fugitive dust shall be controlled through the use of water or other soi 1 stabilizers during all construction activities , 21 . Construction activities shall be limited to the hours of 1 :00 AM through ' !•• E:00 PM, Monday through Saturday and no holidays. Palo 17 - council/Agwncy idinutes - 2/16/88 22 . Xf subsurface archaeological remains are encountered during dev!plop"nt, construction shall be halted at once, the City' s Planning Department shall be notified and a reputable archaeologist shall be contacted for an assessment. 23. A minimum of 10 parking spaces within the parking structure shill be "green-curbed" adjacent to the entrance of the support retail building to provide for temporary parking for the businesses . 24. Project shall provide a rater system capable of providing a fire flow of 4,000 galicns per minute. The number and location of fire hydrants to be placed are pursuant to Huntington Beach fire codes . 25. office towers shall comply vith all State requirements of Title 19 and 24 of the California Administrative Code and Nuntington Beach Fire Depart- ment Specification 417. 25. Fire lanes shall be designated and posted per Huntington Beach Fire Department Specification 41S. 27 . Security gates when used shall comply with Huntington Beach Fire Depart- ment Specification 403. All other security considerations due to the nature of the sensitive defense work shall be reviewed and approved by th Hunttn,gton - Beach Fire Department in order to assure prompt access to all Portions of the building in the event of an emergency incident. 1 28 . The support retail building shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system pursuant to Huntington Beach Fire [ tpartment regulations. 29 . The separation wall between the support retail building and the parking structure sh&ll be reviewed and approved by the Huntington Reacts Fire Department pursuant to requirements of the Uniform Building Code. 10. An automatic fire sprinkler systen shall be provided in areas of the parking structure which do not qualify as "open parking stucture. " 31 . A standQipe system shall be required throughout the parking structure. 32. The two restaurants shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system. 33. Allowable nixed uses within the project shall be those expressly allowed by Planning Corrmission Resolution 1357 . 34. A person or agency shall be designated as a permanent 11aiscn to the City under the covenants , conditions and restrictions of the mixed use project for the propose of processing occupancy requests , resolving land use enforcement problems , and any other matters on which the City and prop- erty owner are involved. 35. Materials and architectural elevations of the parking structure and sup- port retail building adjacent to the parking structure shall be revs eweel. and approved by the Design Review Board. 36. Future build-out of the restaurant pads shall be reviewed and approved by the design Review board. M f Page 1B - Council/Agency Minutes - 2/16I84 37 . All building spoils , such as unusable lumber, pipe. and other surplus material shall be disposed of at an off-sit& facility equipped to hale _ thtm. 31. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at all locations of cooking facilities. water ;heaters and central heattnsg units . 39. High-pressure sodium vapor limps shall be used for energy savings in the parking lot . 40. Off-site improvecnents ( i .e . streets , sidewalks , gutters , etc. ) shall be constructer; in accordance with Public Works Department Standards. All sidewalks on aolsa Chic& Street and 9olsa Avenue shall be 6 feet . 41 , All nigh rise construction shall comply with local , stite and NFPA Stan- dar.11 . 42. The parking structure shall be designed to the requirements of Code Amendment No. 87-11 as presently drafted or subsequently amended by the City Council . 43 . The Planning Cocnission reserves the right to revoke this conditional use permit i-f any violations of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Ord- inance Code occurs . 1 . Tht Tentstive Parcel Hap received and dated by the Oepartrr+tnt of Coomr.- ity Development on November 19, 1987. shall be modified depicting the .od;fications described herein: a. The cross sections of 8olsa Avenue and Solsa Chica Street shall be shown on the map. b. Additional rtgnt-of-way dedication shall be required for all decel- erattonlacceleration lanes and bus turnouts . C . Lots 5, 6 and 7 shall be lettered lots . i 2 . access rights shall be granted between all Cartels . i 3, The final parcel map shall be fired with and approved by the Oepartment of Public Works and recorded with the Orange County Recorder. d. A copy of the recordee parse i map steal 1 be fi led with the Department of Community Development. 5. CUR' s shall be tubmitted to the City Attorney and Comunity „tveiopment for review and approval as to form and content. and, wfi en approved, shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder and a copy filed with the Gepartmtnt. of Comunity Development. The CUR' s shill address the limitations on the mixed use development as set forth in Planti.4 cor1s- %ion Resolution No. 1367 and all parking areas on-site. 6. Water supply shall be through the City of Huntington Beach water systOR at the time said parceit are dRveiopvd. sw • r. 213 Pikge 19 - CouneillAgency Minutes - 2/16/88 7. Sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington Beach stwaga Sys- ,y tens at the time said parcels are developed . ` 8. All ritili;ies shall be instilled underground at the tirre said parcels are developed. 9. Compliance with all applicable City Ordinances . 10. Vehicular access J ghts shall be dedicated to- the City of Huntington 8eicli except at locations approved by the, planti! ng Coeeeission or City Council . 11 . The applicant Shall execute and recird a yard agreement acceptable to the Building Division identifying tho areas in which co,nstrurtion will not be allowed. The motion carried by th- following roll call vote: AYES: Kelly, Green. Finley , Erskine , Hinchell NOES : None ABSENT: Bannister Mays taut of the room) I CoUnci Im&n &ys.. t11 ned to thi EggC-, I The Mayor/Chairman called a recess of Council /Agency at 10:35 p.mi. The meeting was reconvened at 10:45 p.n. Nity Cqunc�l) PUBLIC H ,A11ING CI TIQ�- .ILEML .�l� ��-1 - RES4�U- LT► ! J0 SW .: 6IER. U ;.9PPCED ,BIM STREET BAEEIIL 2RE= The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing to consider 'Circulation Element Amend-ment No. 88-1 to amend the Circulation Ele- *ent of the General Plan by reinstating Main Street, as a primary arterial between Yorktown !Avenue and Garfield Avenue. The City Council will also con- sider Negative Declaration No, 87-52 which assesses the environmentai impact of the proposal . The Deputy City Cle{k announced that ail legal requirements for notification, publication and posting had been met, and that she had received no cowQnica tions or written protests to the matter. Mike Adams, Planning Director , presented a staff report . The Mayor declared the hearing open. . There being no one present to speak on the, cutter and there being no protests tiled' either oral or written. the hearing was closed by the Mayor, ti � �•pgw•f +,Yw Wr'MR^N 1an.. .Mwri.... w .' . „ ..... ... __.,...�—__ of StaultInster CIVIC CENTER 8203 WESIMINSTER BOUL€VAAD Chants V. $myth WESTMINSTER, CALIFORNIA 92683 Mayor M CODE 098.3311 F'tank G. Fry, J. May A, 1950 Mayor Pro Tin+ Lyn G1:jo" City Council Councilwoman City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Anita how�sn C�rnc►Iwoman Huntington Beach, California 9:648 Joj L Nowgebat*r Dear Council Members : Councilwoman Subject: McConnell Douglas "Twin Towers" Traffic Mitigativn Payment tC has been our understanding since the "Twin Towers" project was approved some time ago that a condition of approval required McDonnell Douglas to pay for $100,000 worth of traffic mitigation measures in the City of Wesrr,1inster. Based on this understanding, we set our top priority at the intersections of Garden Grove Boulevard/Bolsa Chica F•1ad and Garden Grove Boulevard/San Diego (405) and Garden Grove (22) Freeway ramps for intersection improvements in conjunction with the "Towers" project. Traffic capacity in this congested area will be significantly increased by the proposed addition of new travel lanes. The City of Westminster has an OCUTT project approved to pay for a portion of the total cost of the ympro+,�ements, but the S100,000 from M-Ponnell Douglas is needed to provide the matching funds . If those funds are not convnitted at your meeting of May 7, 1.190, we will not he able to award a contract by the June 30, 1990, deadline for the OCUTT funding , I Without the McDonnell Douglas traffic impact fees. Westminster cannot provide the matching fund,. In that event, the OCUTT funding will be lo,,t and we will be unable to make the needed improvements. Therefore, we respectfully request you to take appropriate action to insure that the $100,000 is committed to Westminster for payment by June 30, 1990. I Sincerely yours , , Charles V. Smith Mayor cc: Westminster City Council cc: iity Manager 00, N to R F 1 "Y ' i'A"1}.%:1I( 1�r�ta �11:► 93M]�ad �1r Page : 6 - Council /A. eney Minutes - 2016lg8 12 . The applicant shall repair any damage to Soisa Avenue or Bois& L. Street of damage during chase I or Phase II construction . This �.. require the re-paving of the street to its newly paved condition. 13 . A traftic improvement study shall be initiated 'and MR118red towi ttee comprised of representic Lives from the city of Huntington Beach, Westminster and the Westminster Village residential tommunity, and co+n- pieted within six mnths , This study shal . Include but not be limited to , dentifying intersection improvements in both the Cities of Huntington 3each and Westminster , identifying programs and policies to -comply with .he Air Quality Management District guidelines for major emplayers . and :he Transportation Systems Hanavement Plan as identified in condition number 7 of the conditions of approval . McGennell Douglas shali provide a financial contribution to the City of Huntington Beach for traffic im,,provernent in the arount of t.�eir fair share for finding these improve- nents not to excei�d SiCO,G00 the ,point co. r.,ittee Shall make recocrrtienda- ,ion for street impt-overner-ts to the respective cities of Huntington Beach and hestmins : er . This 1 ! r,itA-tion shall coly apply to the physical improvements . The contribution for traffic intersection improvements .^ shal 1 be ad? Prior to first certificate of occupancy and shall be admi n-- iste+'eo by ttie City i3` Huntington Beach . McDonnell Douglas shall still be required to DAy the full e.rnaunt for in;1e.menting any enployee related Air Quality ri �nrg,'. '^ '. Cist1 ice ^i ti,;ation programs . 14 . -h�) aapl1cir, s l be respons`•bie for all changes or adui .ions to street signs . t 71, r�-,1 ,i,ys and ,tripings that are generated by changes duce ro th"� i�me,� ts of Li�L J�'` •: �1:j�1:�r1 15 . `(o tra%'el i :r, closure; cin E,�lt : Chica Streill or Bolsa N,. enue will be perm tte,:i r: o cept Gy sD�c i l l ocr-.' t issued by the D� rector of Public Works. 16 . Hater cc- sci"vat ' ('n Sur.n as the instdl. la :ion of i,- v flu.h toi- � 1 -d YQ l nITe shower hits?i:5 . C';1'i;^`c 1�'.apters , faucet f 10N control , not water f•;circulaticn ariC1 the ise of drougnt-res ' stant Iandscaoe matErial :hal ) be inr. i :;CPo the s _ 1 , 7 . "he �:' . �, � .. •, � : e�:•r .. � � ! ^ :;o � Sd r . enue is Rrt',erti ': overlo„(frd. "he aoc c,Ari t +,na } l of vo-t proposed , nd/or er. i s t i,ng f 1 ows to the Grahai Street s?';er So thit Dolsa A enue line wl 1 l ui timatel y flew wl trig ccCe0t Ia . C.n- sate s e pr '.'.3tt' ariki 51Zt i,o accoi.,Aoddte future flow� r •►. l 39 , 'rrior to th issuarce of builGtn.7 permits on the 66 acre MdOorrie) 1 -Daug- : 3s property locate.:, 3t the northwest corner of Bolsa Avenue anti Spring- c:ale Street , clearance Shall be obtained from the Orange ;.aunty, ianita - tior District statin5 that such development riII rot adverse: y impact :he saver system . Such clswance Shall be in the form of a letter to thi` Cirertor of Public Works and the Director of Cosrwnity Dereloponent . .20 . F41it1ve dust shall be controlled lthrougy the use of dater or other stabillters during all conStruttlt'to aCtivitllS. '# s, r 21 . CBtrtltt14A "CIVit!ts shl t bt 1fa1 t td the hours of 7.00 AM throe ,ti �� q ys CITY OF HUNTINGTON W' �wI��I�nIr Y•Y.�1�-WIW�/I�w�l `y 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA M" PH OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK February '9 5 , 19,1112 Westminster Village tit,r' s Assoc . WIR Property 4,1nagement , I rcy 1066" t_awson Lane Huntington Beach. 'A 92646 The C it-v Council. or !:he r i tt of ►-ur.tirgmi :,'each it vie ir• retwla►- meeting helu February 16, i?t;'a , c.enied the awa+ `iiec! Iny vour firr on be►ial f of .�'estm ins ter 7i 1 to^e ficisre(%,wners ►.ssoc. , to Cooditional Ilse Perri L Ccnditi�rial ;xceno ien ,7-95 , 7entati ve Parcel Map 87- * 2 anti Envir,'rnletital ''-y1 . - QrOjeZt 1+a5 appru ed with carious conJi : ions . "'lease ev ie�se Lail %atherirl �' .+ i •,� , e10vmtxn Leva►-fire rt , 535-527/ 1 for r,ore; 'nformat� on . Alicia 141. nen worth City Clerk r A.4W:CB :bt CC : McDonne': 't Daug las qea 1 ty Co. 13E;I Yuri Orman Avenue Suite 12C0 rvi ne, CA 92715 ne ,r �r CrrY OF HLNYTVYSA 11 ON 4 ' MAIN STREET ....,��_: .�.~•�•FORMA .; A CALI1 OFFICE OF TMIF OTY CLERK I : February 25, 1988 Mary Lou Morey, City Clerk Cir,y of Westminster 820-j Westminster Blvd. Westminster, CA 9269 The City Council of the City of Hontingtor. Beacn at their regular meeting held February 16, 1988, denied the iipoeal filed by the City of Westminster to Conditional Use hermit 27-44 , Cenaitional rxceDtion 87-95, Tentative Parcel 'sap °7-1412 and Environmental Impact Report 87-4 . This project was approved with various conditions. Please call Catherine O' Hara , Cc . ,,unity L'e,relnr,ent Ueairtrrent , 536-5271 for more infonration . Alici-a M. Wentworth City Cleric AMW:CB: bt CC: McDonnell Douglas Realty Co. IPMI fo;, Karmen Avenue Suite 120 Irvine, CA 92715 AA r� :S er ' *OWNAW Ad►votwt "O"s of ar AMw., �-. oAbK liht lc�f 1 . 1 1 ONPIW er Ibe SUPWW cowl a+ (.Wdoo „��rl lYAIn'P?04'P�K?� ,.,i �'ntnY 1 f1 "viv w A-4814, dowel 21 ti 0100 W. In I, and 1 I STATE OF CALWORNtA �. dUX COMMY at Oran" 04 ..r &%new* 40 .t ,MI f i am a Ciflaw of the United States t,nd a resiW nt of <, "'Ca WO aloresod. i am over the age of etghtaerl 1W& w4 nom a pafiy to a inleKealed in the bellow SnYlfNed rhatW. f am a pfNXtpal clerk of the Oranpe 04" DAILY PILOT, with wtliCh is combined the NEWS-PRESS. a newspaper of general circulatirr.t. prided and putatished In the City of Costa Mesa. rwd► a Ca my of rf". State of Cati?ofrna, and that a on M saw W "N 1IM M�MIt-Ilk of wtwttti copy attached hereto is a true and complete ft""Y 1 COPY, was printed and published in the Costa Mesa, NewrrcxY Seact+, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley. Will w fh WvOw. the South Coast communities and Laguna 4111*04 L4*0 worms Beech iss is of said newspaper !or a r,r or Conte uttve weeks to wit the •ssue(s) of tttwAMMOAA ' �lo11 Feb_.. 198—._ to s 198.----- 1. M 1M1IMirw 19b.._.__ ;e i deciaro, under penalty of perjury, that the ftwepi g is true and Correct, E�xr GWed F ► 198 .N— at Costal M*eA- , California. � Signature ' ✓` �.. P PMOP i 4W. r �y r i L j QUA OW&' r 4QlatiffU3ffitatm1'*nsttr,,t, P...,,0 k• ._ f civic cr-ArEn 8200 WE 5 WINS1 ER BOUIE:VAR1.3 WESTMINSTER, CAUFOV1NIA 92F83 714 C,(?E;(: 8ca•3311 February 1 , 1988 ��, ys FCB 410 Honorable Mayor and City Council aWOFHUNTMTON City of Huntington Beach CITY COUK& p'rf� 2001) Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 SUBJECT: City of Westminster 's &Mleal of the McDonnell Douglas Towers De:veloL ent Dear Mayor & Council Members : Based upon the recent meeting between mu-,rber, s of both our cities ' engineering and planning staffs, I be-' -,'.eve that West►•ninster' s concerns with the additional traffic that will be produced by the proposed McDonnell Douglas Towers pro?ect and our staff ' s rationale for requesting that McDonnell Douglas be assessed to par for traffic mitigation efforts were :iot adequately explained in -our letter of appeal. The Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Towers project includes a traffic study which identifies five intersections located within Westminster that will be impacted if the project is constructed . Westminster City Engineer Neal Thompson reviewed the EIR and conducted his own supplementary analysis of the information. He also reviewed the possible m.it?.gation treasures identified in the EIR and met with Huntington Beach :staff to discuss the traffic problems . r. Thompson estimates that the total cost of improving the wive identified intersections to be approximately $500 , 000 . We all recognize that these intersections are already impacted and are operating over capacity during peak hours , and agree that it mould not be reasonable to expect McDonnell Douglas to pay for the full range of needed improvements. However, atice an 'ntersection is operating over capacity, any increase in traffic Leven a small, one ) will result in impacts which result in additional delm s experienced by motorists that are far longer than the percentage -increase in total traffic. Therefore, our staff identified the three intersections most impacted by the Towers project and estimated that t e reasana miti ate t m This was the "Iminor Mr. ompson 's letter to the Huntington Beach Planninq DepartsAent requesting that the Towers project be conditioned to mitigate the traffic impacts at Garden Grove Bnulevard at the 22 - 405 freeway ramps, Garden Grove Boulevard and Bo•lso Chic& Road, and West- minster Boulevard and Springdale Street intersections. In a sense, it is unfortunate that previously approved improwments to y �r Mayor i City council y ftbruary 1 , 1988 Paige 2 ,a tht McDonnell Douglas site were occurring simultaneously which have (r significant impact on Rancho Road. The additional Rancho Road access, by itself, would increase the traffic flow here, and the City of Westminster staff has been discuosing with McDonnell DouglaR directly measures for the potential mitigation of these improvements . { It is Westminster ' s feeling that the $155, 000 figure is a reasonable i one for McDonnell Douglas to be assessed, based upon the impact of the McDonnell Douglas Towers development, and we now feel that the additional impact )on m-h Read can be mitigated for a figure of $70, 000, bringing totalof funds needed to assist. in the mitiga- tion of impacts toE275 , 000 Thank you for your t;onsideration of this matte: . Sincerely, r Charles V. Smith Mayor Pro Tem sd s. .i,.0.., .:._.. ., ,.. .i..i. ,. t'.i a, .1 ..t 'a1•..dw.... ,.u.._.......,... . . ,... _. . - t:. .. .... .. „.. ,...�... chie'i9iC.lYuti,YYL�i•iydMLtL.gd.�.. -211 l it t 'a I Environmental Board r CITY OF NUNTING'rON BEACH ( �9�tY', Gc+f +�� vn� n'� �itwc *Not Post Office Brix 190 ` . r nrtt,(r1t�+rt E3t�t3t,li, C.111iornaa 926-18 . 1?tltn'i'4=i4 BEAci^i February 15, 19U DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FF8 16 1" Huntington Beach Planning Commission P. 0. Box 190 1P.O. Box 190 Numt'n.tnn I?-ach. CA 92W Huntington Deacl:, CA 92648 Attn: Mike Adams Dear Mr. Adams: The Huntington Beach Environmental Board has reviewed Conditional Use Permit No, 87--44/Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 97-95 (!McDonnell-.r"las Realty Co.). We find tht permit adequately addresses the environmental concerns of the project with one exception. Although not directly adjacent to the proposed project area, there is a need to create a buffer between the McDonnell-Douglas Orrice Complex and the ourrounding community in the vicinity of Rancho Read and Spa Drive, to minimize traffic impacts to this residential area. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this permit. Sincerely, Corinne Welsh, Chairman Environmental Hoard s.._- J legal, Co-chaan lWiD mneil--Douglas Committee CW:CMO:gbm cc: Dean Albright 1rtoe Alfieri Let Wieder Committee Members ill v t �I d n'a•a , y� .� ti � r: REOM FOR CITY COUNCIMCTION Dsto Fghriiarx 16 _ 19AA - #Ait+adto: Honorable Mayor and City Council � bdwgftdby: Paul Cook, City Administrator by: Douglas N. La Belle, Director, Community Develom tl Sub ct: APPEXa 'X) TKE PLANNING comiSSION ' S APPROVAL OF CONDITIONNI'A USE PERMIT NO . 87-44/COWDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 87-95/TENTATLVE PARCEL MAP NO. 87-424/EN'VIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 87-4 Carwhftnt with Council policy? K Yes j ) Now Policy or Exception Statenm t of Issw, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: t STATEPMi1T 4.F._ .iZ: Transmitted for Council consideration is an appeal to the Planning Commission ' s approval of Conditional Use Permit No . 87-44 , Conditional Exception (Variance) No . 87-95 , Tentative Parcel Map No . 87-424 and Environmental Impact Report flo. 87-4 . The entitlements and EIR cover a request by McDonnell-Douglas Realty Corpor=,%tion to permit the development of a 604 , 982 square loot , mixed use development on 18 . 42 acres of land owned by McDonnell-Douglas and located at the northeast corner of Bolsa Avenue and Bolaa Chica Street . Conditional Use Permit No . 87-44 i ,; a request to permit an 8 and 12 story office building , as well as 2 restaurants , a support r©tail building and parking facilities for 2 , 524 vehicles . Conditional Exception (Variance) No . 87-95 is a request; to allow more than fifty percent of the required front yard setback for the office toners to be used for :surface parking . Tentative Parcel Map No . 87-424 is a request to create 7 parcels on the 18 . 42 acne site . Environmental Impact Report No . 87-4 analyzes the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project and identifies measures to mitigate those impacts . The Planning Commission approved the project on January 5 , 1988 . 4n January 15 . 1988 , appeals to the Commission ' s decision were filed by the Mayor of the City of Westminster and by HMR Property Management, Inc . , the management company for Westminster Village Homf:owner ' s Association. l annin r*Q=iaeioft itecocecann 1"n: ,f At their regular laeeting of January 51 1988, the Planning Commission took the Following action: t F41I s ' ISM WrIOM BY SCii %hCKU AND StCOND BY LIVE OD� ENVIAtyINftN'TAL II ACT MOST Na. 87-4/COKDITIONAL USE PERMIT 00. e7--44/COOMI?I "L f 09CM1010 (VARIANCE) NO. 87-95 AND 'rMATIVE PARCEL MAP W. 57-424 I11119 "PROM WITH FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTt; AT9S: Silva, Schumacher , Pierce, Leipzig , Livengood mots: None AbSL=: Higgins AMAIN: !lone ON NOTION BY SCHUMACHER AND SECOND BY LEIPZIG, RESOLUTION NO, 1387 ADAPTING A LIST OF USES WHICH wrLL BE ALLOWED AS rkkT OF THE MC DONNELL-DOUGLAS OFFICE COMPLEX, A MIXED USE INDUSTRIAL 0ZV2WPW.NT, WAS APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Silva , Schumacher , Pierce, Leipzig, Livengood NOLS: gone ASSENT: Higgins ABSTAIN: pone mpy,NGS FOE _ Y - r4 CQNDI11gN?1 Ljol .(V IAKF.) 87-9.� 1 . The proposed mixed use project , with conditions of approvel and mitigWon measures identified in EIR 87--4 , will not have a detrimental effect upon the general health, welfare, safety and j ronvenieuce of persons residing or working in thy: neighborhood, nor will it be detrimental to the value of property and improvements in the vicinity . 2 . The proposed mixed use office project Which include 65 Percent of the gross floor area of the buildings to box used as corporate office headquarters is consistent with the Hl-A Zoning District and the General Plan Land Use designation of General Industrial . 3. The proposed mixed use office project is compatible with existing and proposed :uses in the vicinity which include general industrial to the south, Seal Beach Naval Weapons Canter to the west and the McDonnell-Douglas Astronautics Facility to the north and east . 4 . The location, site layout , and design of the proposed mixed use office project properly adapts the proposed structures to streets , dri.vewaya and other adjacent structures in a harmonious manner . Project entries , deerleration lanes and changes to the existing medians in Balsa Chico Street and bolas Avenue have been properly dtai.gn*d by a Traffic Engimwr is order to mitigate impacts on the existinq circulation system. kb WA %1 ti. 5 . The combination of the proposed uses on the site, as not forth in Draft Resolution no. 1387 , are properly integrated on the site. 6 . Access to and parking for the proposed mixed uss office project will not create undue traffic problems . The new traffic signal on Dole& Avenue at the main entry to the project will encourage employees to use thi3 entrance. The speed ramp on the east side of the parking structure will facilitate orderly ingress And egress from the parking structure. 7 . The granting of Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 87-95 to allow for more than 50 percent of the front yard setback to be used for parking will be offset by the provision of landscape on the site far in excess of code requirements, insuring that the project will not be materially detrimental tc the public health, safety and welfare or injurious to the conforming land , property or improvements in the neighborhood . B . Exceptional circumstances (the granting of the Use Variance for building heights up to 250 feet ) do nct apply generally to M property in the same district . 9 . The granting of Conditional Exception (Variance) No . 87-95 is necessary for the preservation of and enjoyment of substantial property rights . 10 . The Orange County Sanitation District planned for 71 , 469 gallons of sewage effluent per day to be generated L• rom this 18. 4 acre sire. The proposed project is projected to generate 110, 447 gallons per day; a 54 percent increase over that which was planned for . it is understood that this project is utilizing a sewage capacity credit of approximately 38, 978 gallons per day from the undeveloped 66 acre_ McDonnell-Douglas j site located along Springdale Avenue . FI 1IMC--S OF 288CE,k.-M 1 . The proposed subdivision of 7 parcels for purposes of industrial use is in compliance with the size and shape of property necessary for that type of development . 2. The Ceneral Plan has set forth provisions for this type of land use as well as setting forth objectives for implementation of thin type of use. 3 . The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the tine the land use designation of general industrial allowing for corporate offices and the high rise node designation allowing for multi--story buildings was placed on the subject property. ,a ItC /► - 2/1i/lea -3- ��rgsl � r �. The sire, depth, frontage, street width and other design and improvement features of the proposed subdivision are proposed to be constructed in compliance with standard plans and specifications on file with the City as well as in compliance with the State Map Act and supplemental City Subdivision �r ordinance . fT 11B tyl►APPRf�YAl: - COIfQjTr0NAL USE PEkM1T 87--41 ARQ T93,021011 (u8 CE) N0 . 87-q2: I . The site plan received and dated December 29, 1987, shall be revised depicting the codifications described herein: a . Additional stairwells shall be provided within tl-e parking structure per Fire Department requirements . Three stairwells shall be added to the east side and one stairway shall be added to the west side . b. Full size parking stalls on-grade shall be dimensioned as 17 feet by 9 feet with a 2 foot ov.:rt:ang . Additional 2 feet shall be added to the landscape planter for this overhang area . c . A deceleration lane along Aolsa Avenue shall be provided at the project ' s major entry. The length and design of the deceleration lane shall be subject to the review and approval of the Public Works Department . d . Building shall be accessible on two (2) ;sides by way of roadways (fine lanes) not less than twenty-seven (27) feet in width, with adequate turning radii . Roadway (fire lanes ) shall be not be less than ten (10) feet or more than thirty (30) feet from building. Fire lanes shall provide access to a minimum of 50 percent of the ground floor perimeter of the buildings . e. A dedicated fire lane shall be provided on all sides of the parking structure. Fire lanes are for emergency access and must be a minimum of twenty-four (24) feet An width . f . The surface parking layout of Phase I in the location of the Phase 11 parking structure shall be revised to encourage efficient ingress and egress from the signalised project entry on bolsa Avenue and discourage use of the secondary Solsa Chicr entry. The revised parking lot layout shall be rubject to the review and approval of the Planning Director and Public M4orks Department . 2. The elevations received and dated December 29, 1967l rhall be � revised depicting the modification described herein: a. Great,st architectural emphasis of the building base and building entrance shall be provided . The final elevatioen shall bar ewbject to the review and approval of the Design Review board . 3. Prior to the issuance of a grading plan, the applicant shall submit a hydrology report for review and approval of the Public Works Department. 4 . Prior to the issuance of building permits for Phase 10 B-story office building (excluding gracing and foundation permits) , tho applicant shall submit the following documents fo4 the review and approval. of Department of Public Forks and Community Development : a. foils analysis , prepared by a registered Roils engineer . This analysis shall, include on-site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recormwndations regarding grading, chemical an4 fill properties, foundations , retaining walls, streets and utilities . b. Grading plan c. A Landscape and rrrigation Plan . This Preliminary Landscape Plan, received and dated October 28, 1987 , shall be revised depicting the modifications described h►3rein: I (1) Of the sixty 36" box accent trees indicated in the applicant' s preliminary landscape plan, twenty shall he upgraded to 48" boa sire ( this would include the 8 existing coral trees to be relocated) . (2) The trees in the perimeter planting area between the parking lot and arterial streets , and adjacent existing parking areas , shall be a minimum of 300 box size. The perimeter Planting area stall be 'bermed . (3) The trees within the interior of the project site shall i be a minimum of 24" box size , (4 ) Trees of 15 gallon size or less shall not be :,tilized in the landscape plan . ( 5) The irrigation plan shall include the use of low angle sprinkler heads along the perimeter of the site and the use of drip irrigation to interior planters to minimize water runoff . (6) Phase I landscaping shall .include completion of all proposed landscaping along Bolsa hyanue and Poisa Chica Street . RC11 e (7) The surface parking area on the eastern portion of the site where .:he proposed phase II parking structure will be built shall be stripe-A with landscape planters between opposing lanes of parking stalls . The status of Phase II construction shall be reviewed on an annual basis by the Planning Director to determine if landscape materials shall be installed in the temporary parking area . Landscape shall be installed in the temporary parking area within five years of the date of approval of this conditional use permit. d . A comprehensive, permanent set of convenantd, conditions and restrictions covering limitations on the mixed use entitlement including a list of permitted uses and any conditions of approval for the project , and all development, performance, and management standards shall be submitted for staff review. A recorded copy shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development trior to occupancy of any building . Approval for content shall be the responsibility of the Department of Community Development and approval as to form by the City Attorney. Any modifications to the approved convenants, conditions and restrictions must be submitted to the City for approval . e. A parcel map creating leasable parcels on the site . Said may shall be recorded prior to final inspection and a copy submitted to the Department of Community Development . f . Geologist Report . An engineering geologist shall be engaged to submit a report indicating the ground surface acceleration from earth movement for the subject property. All structures within this development shall be constructed in compliance with the G- factors as indicated by the ' geologist ' s report . Calculations for fittings and structural members to withstand anticipate6 G-factors , shall be submitted to the City for review. g . A Silt Control Plan. A plan for silt control for all storm runoff from the property during construction and during initial operation of the facilities, submitted to the Department of Pudic Works for review. 5 . Prior to commencing above grade construction the applicant shall prepare a P.reconstruction Fire Plan , for review and approval of the Fire Department , which guarantees adequate access and fire protection for a building of this type of construction during all construction phases . 6 . Prior to issuance of a Certificate oZ occupancy for they Phase 1 , 8-story office building the applicant shall construct the following public right-of-way improvements per Public Works standazdar : 4CA - 2/16/88 6 . A 100 loot left turn storage lane for eastbound traffic on Solna Avenue coning from sale& Chic& Street . b. Install a traffic signal on Bolas Avenue at the access point to the site 10000 feet east of the Bolss Chica signal . c. The applicant shall to responsible for providing the conduit, cable, and controller hardware necessary to coordinate the traffic signals at the intersections of Springdale and Bolus Graham and Bole& Balsa and proposed pedestrian signal at ]McDonnell-Douglas entry on Bolsa Balsa and new signal to be provided For this project Bolas and Bolas Chica This will require the installation of conduit from Springdale to Bolsa Chica . d. Construct a 150 foot westbound left turn pocket on Bolos Avenue beginning approximately 600 feast east of the Bolsa Chica Street centerline e. provide a second access point for the project along Balsa Avenue with the opening beginning and ending approximately 300 and 355 feet, respectively, east of ftlaa Chica Street centerline . This access point shall be restricted to right turn only access. f . Construct a median break on Bolus Chic& Street to serve the project entry. The median break shall be devigned to allow for sorthbound left turns into the project, but shall prohibit westbound left turns out of the project . The City may, basest on traffic studies , limit or preclude left-hand turns from Solsa Chica (southbound) onto the subject site such as by placing "no left- turns• signs during peak hours . q. Construct a new bus stop/turnout on westbound Bolas Avenue adjacent to the project site and in northbound Bolas Chica Street . The precise design and location of the turnouts shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department and OCTD. The area adjacent to the turnouts shall be able to accommodate a passenger waiting area with a bus shelter and bench. A paved, lighted, handicapped accessible pedestrian accessway shall be provided between the stops and the project buildings . 7. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of occupancy for Phase 2 , 8-story office tower the following requirements shall be fulfilled: a . A planned sign program for the entire development shall be submitted to and approved by- the Director of Community Development . Co..( I RCA - 2i26iee (99596) b. A► Transportation systm Management pion (TOM) for review and approval of the Public ftcks Dopartmat and Commaity Derelo"Wat De partmat of the City of Huntington leach. roval of k 1 b<f �f1 Plan t city a�►Pp by !� tr shall include coaesultatioe with the City of "estainster. The !� P Plan Shall address the following proga:ame: ( 1) Hiring a TSN Coordinator ( 2) Financial incentives for ridesharing ( 3) Flexible or modified Mork hours ( 4) Preferential parking for vehicles used for rideshaarieg ( S) On-site child care facilities ( i) Video and audio teleconferencing in the work place ( 7) Carpool matching service ( 8) Vanpool program ( 9) Employee buses (10) OCTD matching service (11) Bale of monthly OCTD bus passes on-site (12) Provision of bicycle facilities (13) Van shuttle service oetweetn the twain offi(:e acid outlying offices (14) Monitoring of air quality reports I c . All Phass I lon,33cape shall be installed including the perimeter setback area along cols• and Bolas Chic& in Phase S . Prior to the issuance of building permits for the Phase II. IR--story office building, or parking structure, the applicant shall submit for review and approval of the Public Works Department an interim traffic and parking plan to insure there is adequate parking on-site during Phase YI construction. 9 . Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for Phase I1 , 12-story office building and parking structure, the folleving requirements shall be fulfilled : a . The applicant shall convert the wastbournd right turn to a through/right turn lane at the Springdale/Solna Intersection . b. The applicant shall submit an instrLAent, acceptable to the Fire Department and Community Development Department, guaranteeing that an area will be net aside on the eastern Boundary of the parking structure as a fire lane. 10 . A 12-inch water main shall. be constructed in Dole* China Street from Bolas Avenue to the project ' s .,northerly boundary. 11 . All on-site water mains shall be located within vehicular t raivealways and dedicated to the City. RCA - 2/16/48 -i- ( 9931d) .w•w-,..,ry... .. ... ...�..;.... .._ .. ....,... . ,., ,. 1.�`i!. ... ..... Fz•��5...+...w.'n.- ._ �. .. - - - __ lt. Thi applicant shall repair any d umge to Bolas Avenue or Nolsa Chica Street of das}age during Phase I or Phase It construction . This will require the re-paving of the street to { its SOwly, paved condition . I 13 . licDonnelI-Douglas shall pay for their proportionate share of the costs for traffic Improvements within the City of "estminstrer at the following intersections constructed as a result of the proposer) development in the City of Huntington Beach. The City of Westminster anticipates improvements to the .following intersections: Garden Grove Boulevard/22-405 freeway ramps Garden Grove: Boulevard/Bolaa Chica Road . Westminster/Springdale W estnsinester/Bolas Chica Rancho Road/Balsa Chica Cost estimates for the proposed improvements total $155, 400 . A stue*y shall be undertaken to determine the percentage of traffic originating from this proposed development which impacts the intersections listed above. The payment to the City of Westminster shall be based an the percentage of traffic 'E identified as originating from the proposed project to be mutually agreed upon by the City of Westminster And Huntington Beach. In any case, payment shall not emceed 435, 000. Payment shall be made to the City of Westminster prior to the issuance of building permits for the phase 11 office tower . The developer 's obligation to the City of Westminster shall be limited to those intersections listed above. If further study no longer warrants or proper authority cannot be obtained for the identified improvements, the developer shall have no other obligation to they City of Westminster. 14 . The applicant shall tee responsible for all changes or additions to street signs, pavement markings and striping% that are generated by changers due to the requirements of the development . 15 . No travel lane closures on Bolas Chica Street or Boles Avenue will be. permittedexcept by especial permit issued by the Director of Public, Works. 16 . Water conservation measures , such as the installation of love flush toilets, low volume shower heads , turnoff adepteec= , faucet flow control, hot water recirculation and the use of drought-resistant landscape material shall be included in the project design. RCA 2/16/88 17. The City' s 12-InCh sa mr wain in Balsa Avenue is presently overloaded. The applicant shall divert proposed and/or existiey flows to the Graham Street saner so that the Wlsa Avenue line will ultimate/ flow within acceptable levels. r P It. On-sits sewers shall be private and sized to acconoodate future flows from the north. 19 . Prior to the issuance of building permits on the 66 act* McDonnell-Douglas property located at the northwest corner of Solna Avenue and Springdale Street, clearance shall be obtained from the Orange County Sanitation District stating that such development will not adversely impact the sewer system. Such clearance shall be in the form of a lettex to the Director of Public Works and the Director of Conrminity Development . i 20 . Fugitive dust shall be controlled through the use of water or other moil stabilizers during all construction activities . i 21 . Construction activities shall be limited to the hours of i 7 : 00 AM through 8 : 00 PM. 22. rf subsurface archaeological remains are encountered during development, construction shall be halted at once, the City' s Planning Department shall be notified and a reputable archaeologist shall be contacted for an assessment . 23 . A minimum of 10 parking spaces within the parking structure shall be "green- curbed' adjacent to the entrance of the support retail building to provide for temporary parking for the businesses. 24 . Project shall provide a rater system capable of providing a fire flow of 4, 000 gallons per minute. The number and location of fire hydrants to be placed are pursuant to Huntington Beach fire codes . 25 . Office towers shall comply with all State requirements of Title 19 and 24 of the. California Administrative Code and Huntington Beach Fire Department Specification 417 . 26 . hire lanes shall be designated and posted per Huntington Beach Fire Department Syecif ication 415 . 27. Security gates when used shall comply with Huntington Beach Fire Department Specification 403 . All other security considerat-ions due to the nature of the sensitive defense work shall be reviewed and approved by th Huntington beach Fire Department in order to assure prompt access to all portions of the building in the event of an emergency incident . 28. The support retail building shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system pursuant to Huntington Beach fire Department regulations . ... too RCA - 2/16/18 _10- (9939d) 29. The separation wall between the support retail building and the parking structure shall be reviewed and approved by the Huntington Beach Fire Department pursuant to requirements of the Uniform Building Code . 30. An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be provided in areas of the parking structure which do not qualify an ~open parking stucture. ~ 31 . A standpipe system shall be required throughout the parking structure . 31 . The two restaurants shall be provided with ,an automatic fire sprinkler system. 33 . Allowable mixed uses within the project shall be those ezpressly allowed by planning Commission Resolution 1387 . 34 . A person or agency shall be designated as a permanent liaison to the City under the covenants, conditions and restrictions of the mixed use project for the prupose of processing occupancy requests, resolving land use enforcement problems, and any other matters on which the City and property owner are involved . 35 . Materials and architectural elevations of the parking structure and support retail building adjacent to the parking structure shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board . 36 . Future build-out of the restaurant pads shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board . 37. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, pipe, and other surplus material shall be disposed of at an off--site facility equipped to handle them. 35 . Natural gas shall be stubbed in at all locations of cooking facilities , water heaters and central hosting units . 39 . High-pressure sodium vapor lamps shall be used for energy, savings in the parking lot. 40 . Orf-site improvements ( i . e . streets, sidewalks , gutters, etc. ) shall be constructed in accordance with public Worke Department Standards . All sidewalks on Bolsa Chica Street and Hole & Avenue shall be 6 feet . 41 . All high rise construction shall comply with local, state and PFFA standards . 42 . The parking structure shall be designed to the requirements of ; Core Amendment No. 87-11 as presently drafted or subsequently amend" by the City Council . , F-wl RCA -- 2/.16/88 -11- �i9SS�d) 43 . The Planning Comission reserves the right to rovoke this conditional use permit if say violations at these conditions or the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs . S�I[aII7�6� OT a� a�_ � • 1 . The Tentative Parcel Map received and dated by the Department of Community Development on November 19 , 1987, shall be modified depicting the modifications described herein: a. The cross sections of Balsa Avenue and Bolso Chic& Street shall be shown an the may. b. Additional right-of-way dedication shall be required for all deceleration/acceleration lanes and bus turnouts . c . Lots 5, 6 and 7 shall N5 lettered lots . 2. Access rights shall be granted between all parcels . 3 . The final parcel map shall be filed with and approved by the Department of Public Works and recorded with the Orange County Recorder . 4 . A copy of the recorded parcel map shall be tiled with the Department of Community Development. 5 . CCLR' s shall t►e submitted to the City Attorney and Community Development for review and approval as to forts and content, ! and, when approved, shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder and a copy filed with the Departments of Community Development . The CCLR' s shall address the limitations on the sailed use development as sect forth in Planning Commission Resolution No . 1367 and all parking areas on-site . 6. Water supply shall be through the City of Huntington beach water system at the time said parcels are developed. 7. Sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington Beach sewage system at the time said parcels are developed . 8 . All utilities shall be installed underground at the time said parcels are developed . 9 . Compliance with all applicable City Ordinances . 10 . Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach except at locations approved by the Planning Commission or City Council . do, I . RCA - 2/16/68 -12- (9959d) 11. The applicant shall execute and record a Yard agcoement acceptable to the Building Division identifying the arose in wbich construe tion will not be allowed. j stfirr an kip" . dtaff recomends that the City Council approve CorAitionsl Use Permit no. 87-48 , Conditional Exception (Variance) go. 87-95, Tentative Parcel Map no. 87-424 and Environmental Impact Report No. 67-4 based an the findings and ^onditions of approval reooeaweanded by the Planning Commission. ` Applicant: McDonnell-Douglas Realty Company Appellants : The Mayor of the City Council of Westminster and HKR Property Management Incorporated Location: Northeast coiner of Bois& Avenue and Solna Chic& Street Request : To permit the development of a 606 ,982 square foot mixed-use development . ui��.�aaiQn: +0n January 5 , 19880 the Panning Co,eaission acted on Enviresnsrental G Impact Report No. 87-4 , Conditional Use Permit No. 87- 44 , Conditional Exception (variance) go . 87-95 and Tentative Parcel Map go . 67-424 . The request was to permit the development of a +604 ,982 square foot mixed use project which would consist of the follo"inq elements : N 8 story office building -- 235,631 square feet J 1.2 story office building - 345, 551 square feet 5 restaurant - 70000 square feet t restaurant - 70000 square feet 6 support retail building - 9 , 600 squares feet (See attached staff report dated January 5, 1988, for detailed project. analysis . ) After reviewing they project and considering public testimony, the Planning Commission amended staff ' s recosesrendead cond i t ions and unanimously approved the Envi romsenta l Impact Report and entitlements . RCA - 2/16/69 w13+ (!!Sldy t Subsequent to the Commissions decision, on jonusry lx, 1988 , the Mayor of the City of Mestmi nster and lfM Property Managemes;t , Inc, filed app4818 to the City Couacii of Huntington Beach. Cite of MesstsinatBE D*I &I: Ia 9e0e941, the City of Westminster based its written appeal on the promise that the conditions of approval adopted by the planning Cowaiision do not adequately mitigate the adverse impacts that the - Mixed-development project may impose on the existing circulation system Mithin the City of Westminster. More specifically, however, City of Westminster staff has indicated to Huntington Beach staff that in their opinion, Condition of Approval no. 13 of Conditional Use Permit No . 57-44 , as approved by the Huntington beach Planning Commission* does not adequately mitigate traffic concerns raised by the Cicy of Westminster. During the review and comment period for draft Environmental Impact Report No. 87-41 the City of Westminster requested that the proposed project be conditioned to require .McDonnell-Douglas (the applicant) to mitigate impacts at the three Westminster Intersections noted below: (1) Garden Grove Boulevard/22-e05 Freeways (2) Garden Grove Boulevard/Dols& Chica Road i (3) Westminster Boulevard/Springdale Avenue The letter outlined Westminster ' s proposed improvements and associated costs for improving the intersections . The total cost estimate is $155 , 000 (see attached letter dated December 31, 1987) . It should be noted that the aforementioned Intersections are currently functioning at unacceptable levels of services and that the improvements identified by Westminster are needed whether the McDonnell-Douglas project is built or not . In studies conducted by Heston Pringle Associater , traffic engineser$ for the City of Huntington beach, it was concluded that, assuming a worst case scenario, the proposed McDonnell-Douglas project would generate between one and seven percent of the peak hour volume traffic at the three intersections noted by Westminster . Consequently, Huntington Beach staff recownended to the Planning Commission that McDonnell-Douglas be required to pay their "fair-share" of the needed traffic improvements at the intersections. Given the limited impact that the ticDonreei l-Douglas project will have on these intersections (between one and seven percent of the peak hour volume traffic) , staff recommended that the fair share aasount be limited tc. $35 ,000. This amount would compensate for a , traffic generation contribution of up to twenty-two percent (22%) . NCA - 2/1i/88 -14- (9959d) It is stvff 's opinion that a fair share contribution Is on, adequate W,tigation mossure and could set a precedent Ear future issues that easy crass City boundaries. The Planning Coswiission concurred *ad adopted Condition of Approval Mo. 13 (see page ! of this Request fat Council Action) . However, City of Mestsaiaster staff has medicated t O Huntington beach staff that conditioning the project to pay the full amount of the estimated cost of the needed improroeraats, $155 4thawould be a more appropriate mitigation measure than the "fair-share—contribution condition. This is the basis of itestminsteer' s appeal of the project . Q 'ILtX nacre ant c. A22011 : HMIs Property Management, Inc. based their appeal, un the allegation that Enviconmdntal Impact Report No . 87-4 is inadequate in that it does not a4dress the following impacts that the project may pose to Westminster Village residents: (1) Cumulative traffic impacts from Meadowlarks the bolas Chica and future McDonnell-Douglas development. (2) Potential traffic impacts to Ranches Road. (3 ) Potential noise and dust impacts during construction. �1 (4) Potential aestheettc impacts from tree removal and building � s glare. HNR Property Management, Inc . also questioned the validity of ' recognizing a twenty-Five year old use variance to permit buildings of up to 250 feet in height in an KI , Light Manufacturing, zoning district. In response to HMit Property Management, Inc . ' s appeal , staff has the following comments : As stated on page 26 , Section 3 . 4 . 1 of Environmental :Impact Report no . 87-4 , 'Traffic impacts projected for the vacant 66 acre McDonnell-Douglas site located along Springdale Avenue, as well an ultimate development of the Meadowlark Airport site, and the County►` s draft traffic projections for the Bolsa Chic& were included in this traffic analysis, . ' Cancer n Me 2 An analysis of traffic impacts to Rancho Roan was not included in the Environmental impact Report because it was concluded by the traffic anginee0ts that due to the location of the project site and its traffic circulation design, traffic impacts from the project to Rancho Road will not too measurable. The project 3a designed so that its major entrance anal exit i.s at Solna hvenue. Traffic exiting the Ise WA - 2/16/86 -15- (9959d) project will be encouraged, through signalixotion, to *sit onto golds and head east to 6pringdaie or west to Bolas Chien , it is highly unlikely that project traffic will use Rancho load so a cutover to Bpringdole Avenue. The choice to tarty Springdale Avenue will note logically be made when exiting the facility onto Dols& $ Most of the concerns expressed by MM regarding Rancho Road ore related to current traffic patterns of employees at the McDonnell-Douglas Astronautics facility and are unrelated to the mixed-use development project proposal . The astronautics facility staff is working with Planning staff and Public Works to mitigate the existing problems . Cdnc_grn Mg . 3 RQL" Section 3 . 11.2 of Environmental impact Report No . 87-4 discusses potential noise impacts from the proposed project . The Itestssainster Village residential project was not specifically addressed in this section . However. , the nearest residential unit in Westminster Village is approximately 1, 500 feet north of the project site with a row of mature trees, Rancho Road and a block Mall serving as buffers between the site and the residences . All of these barriers will remain after the site is developed . As stated on page 49 of Environmental Impact report go . 07-4, construction activities will result in a temporary increase in noise levels at the construction site. However, it is unlikely that Westminster Village residents will be significantly impacted by the construction noisde. Construction vehicles will enter the site via Bolas Avenue and construction activities will be limited, as por Article 8 . 40 of the Huntington Bosch Municipal Code . No construction activity will, be permitted between 8 : 00 PH and 7 :00 Me Monday through Saturday, and construction activity will be prohibited entirely on SunQays . once completed, the actual operation of the project is not expected to cause an increase In ambient noise levels . The proposed land uses are not known as sources of significant noise levels . Dust Potential fugitive dust will be mitigated through the use of saoil. stabilizers or water during grading . A grading permit is required for this project and will be uti 1 issted by the City as a means to ensure proper dust abatement . Present use of the site Is agriculture. Development of the site will ultimately result in a reduction of fugitive dust generated from the ui te . WA - 3/16/88 -16- (9959d) The site in currently lined with swture trees along its perimeter. Developma of the site will result in a net inctonse of trees on the site (213 mature trees exist, 176 trees will be removed, 37 trees will be preserved and 567 now trees will be planted for a not increase of 391 trees) . The approved landscape plan includes provisions that the northern, southern and western perimeters of the site will be tree lined. Also, the existing earthen berms surrounding the site will remain. 11u�ia OAKS I With regard to potential glare impacts From the buildings, d1.e tO the fact that the sun will be striking the project from the south , the potential for glare would be toward the industrial coupler on Bolza Avenue and the naval weapons station to the west. The orientation of the office towers , in conjunction with the low reflective glass that is specified for the project , miti.get as any glare potential that may exist: . Valk yarj as nceNo 133 On May 15, 19620 the City of Huntington Beach P2snninU Commission approved Use Variance No. 433 for a portion of th,.# MCDonnell-Douglas property which includes the subject site . The use variance Eton 1962 is equivalett to a Multi-Story (nth) zoning suffix designation on the site. The MS suffix was developed in the 19700s to d*signote areas for multi-story times . Prior to that, use variances wawa, used for the some purpose . The site is identified in the ins..aroral Plan as a Multi-Story district. The City Attorney' s office indicated that the use variance in valid . An a point of cla: ifiration, the Planning Commission directed staff to initiate a zone change to add the PM suffix tc the a:te ' s zone designation so that the site many be readily identifiable on the zoning maps as a multi.-story zone . The tone rehange would be an administrative matter for the purpose of updating the site' s: zone designation. In addition to appealing the specific proposed project , HKR Property Management, Inc. requested that the following itamli be provided (either t%y Huntington Reach or McDonnell-Douglas) prior to final Council approval of the project . (1) widen and curb Rancho Road from Westminster Boulevard to Dole* Chica Street . (2) Install a traffic signal at the intersection of Rancho Road and Suffolk Streets and a loft turn arrow and right trigger turn to the existing signal at bolus Chica and St . James . *CA - 2/16/88 �1,7- Cl�9S9da (3) Add/rfplace trees along Rancho Road . (4) Raise block wa11 around entire Westminster village development. It ruins iagm rtent to note that the concerns raiser) regarding Rancho Road are not related to the propos*d mixed use development protect, but are based on existing conditions which are presently being ;addraased by McDonnell-Douglas Astronautics in cc:junction with the City. On January 5, 1988, the Planning Commission certified that Lnviromwntai impact Report No. 87-4 was completed in accordance with the California Environurantal Quality Act. Since approval of the Environmental Impact Report was appealed, the City Council must certify whether the document is adequate. Not applicable . Yy A010I Deny Conditional Use Permit No. 87-44 , Conditional Exception (Variance) No . 87-95, Tentative Parcel Map No. 87-424 and Environmental Impaact Report No. 87-4 mith findings . 1 . Letter from City of Westminster doted December 31, 1967 2 . Appeal letters from the City of Westminster and HM Property Management, Inc. 3 . Response to Mr . Skorupski ' s lettdr from Planning Division Code Enforce "nt officer 4 . Response to appeal from 14cDonnell-Douglas Realty Co. 5. Staff report dated January 5, 1953 6. Site plans , floor plans and elevations dated December 29 , 1987 7 . Planniao CarKaission Resolution No . 1387 as approved January 5, 1983, setting forth allowable mined uses within the development 8 . final Envi rorawntal Impact hoport No. 57-4 DNL :MA:CO:kla RCA - 2/ 14/98 -low (9959d) ANLQ- AL. IIIIIIRWWAP1111r� Tall of Ifestminster CIVIC CENTER 8200 WESTMINSTER BOULEVARD � WESTMINSTER. CALIFORNIA 92663 746 CODE M-33tt December 31 , 1987 Department. of Community Development, - 'r^NH City of Nun t i ny ton Beach 2000 main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 � Attention : Cather?,ne r Mara . Assistant Planner P. O- ftX '4U1Wn,;f:n Bauch, (.•. j2S48 Gentlemen : I sub,i et t : Mi ti.ga t i on of traffic impacts of )reposed Mc Donne 1 1 Dauglas aroject at Balsa Chica Rd . /6oiso Av9nue . DEIR No. 87-4 The proposed development EIR shows significant traffic impacts at five congested City of Westminster intersections already experiencing level of service E or F . They are Garden Grove Blvd . /22-405 frwy . -aRtps . Gars,en Grove Blvd . /Solt& Chica Rd . . Springdale/Westminster , and Goldono4Vst /`Balsa . After usi{sq Monte , Grover 3 Associates to study these intersections and atfter meeting with City of Huntington Eeach staff , the City of Wes CmIns ter requests t hat the McDonnell Do"g 1 as project bit conditioned to mitigate the traffic impacts at three of these intersections located at two major freeway interchange areas in the City of Westminster . The two areas of great cancer►s are the Garden grove Blvd . /Bolaa ::hica Rd . and Westminster/Springdale intersections and the associated freeway on and off ramps . The proposed 2mprovenen'ts and assocsated touts are as follows : 1 . Garden Grove fllvtl . !2:-405 irwy . ramps ta ) Allow lest turns from both northbound approaches ( b y remove signal island to allow for two wits tbound lanes (c: install signal overlie frature to allow southbr)vnd to be coincident +oi th eastbound left turns I sep attached analyses) COST ES11MATE : i 75 ,000 2 . Garden Grove 9 l vd . /So 1 spa Choi c s Rd . ( a ) add westbound left turn lane and add northbound right turn lane and mudity signal to accommodate the changes tsee attached analyses ) COST ESTIMATE : • 50.000 3 . Westmoinster ✓Springdale ( A ) add northbound right turn Lane by combining with N2 through lane and add appropriate signing ( b ) remover portion of median island c+n the westbound left turn pocket to allow more frtorage in the loft turn pa c� o t ,r•w � ' City of Westminster page 2 Subject : Mitigation of Mcdonnell Douglas . (c ) restripe westbound leg for three through lanes/one left turn ; or two through, one combined throughlleft , and one left ( see attached analysts ) COST ESTIMATE'! t 30 ,000 The Garden Gro,.e Blvd . /Solsa Cr,ica Rd . area is under CalTrans control . Even though thes►3 improvements have been d i scuso ed with them , should an impossed arise over I,.he installation of the improvements , the monies could be spent well spent at the intersections of Solsa chica Rd . /Westminster and AolsaJGoldenwes".' which are also seriously impacted by the proposed development . Sincerely , i PUBLIC WORKS DEPr+RTMEWT Engineering Division i �f J Neal Thompson City Engineer i d t ' I .ol* AT of 19countnoter CIVIC CENTER 8200 WFSTMINSTER B Y;J,•4 �rr& WESTMIUSTER, CALIFO 714 CODE d94• I. Ct itArnsary 14, 1988 c,'y ,40,,;r; EMOn F. Ggic" r 'a { MSYM CnarNs V S:Ntt� Honorable Mayor & Members of the M* Or Pro Tim City Caunc i l From* 13. Fry, Jr. City of Huntington Bch c4+M++man 2000 Main Street AAtt& Husst1 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Councowo nan Dear Mayor & Council Memh?rs: .:;I a. NrwigeMutf C-vunc►lwoman At our City Council meeting of January 12, 1988, -ae discussed the rtacent approval by the City of Huntington Beach Planning Commission for a twin tower office complex to be located at the northeast corner of BolsGa Chica Road And Bolsr. Avenue, on property owned by the MCDoiux-11 Douglas Corporation. Because of our concern for the possible detrimental effects this development may have on the residents and lusi.ness people of Wessuninster, we respectfully appeal tho. dEcision of the Piunning Commission for consideration at a public hearing held during a regularly scheduled meeting of the Huntington Beach City Council. It is our belief that the conditions of approval adopted by the commission would not aciaquately mitigate the adverse effi!cts of the project as described -in the Envi ronnen to 1 Impact Report. While the City of Westminster realize.,, the office complex will be an accomplishment Huntington Beach and McDonnell Douglas can both be proud of, we are concerned that the vehicles driwan by, the ecraployees will ceuso significanttraffic circulation problems if we don' t take appropriate measures nor. Since traffic circulation problems have no respect. For r:ity ix aaxiaries, we believe it is irperatYve for Huntington Beach nixi A'csttninstcr to work closely on this proje:t to ensure that all reasonable actions are taken and projects implemented to accommodate the additional vehicles. Begi.rming with the first opportunity Westminster hxaci to review the proposed project, we notified your staff of our concerns regarding the additional traffic arA the inability of surrounding streets, high%mys act) intersections to harrlle the increased volume. On Dme ber 31, 1987 , our sta f suhmitted a letter to your C-mmunity Devclopnent ►tepartmont outlining our areas of concern and requesting that the McDonnell Douglas project be required to f inara;a traffic mitigation measures at three intersectieru located at two major frewway it,'terchange areas idthin the city of Westminster. By working together on this project, the Cities of Huntington Beach and Westminster can address the needs and comiv.ns of both cities as well as McDonmell Douglas and its tn:aployees. Sine rely, Cl-erles V. Smi..h F� Mayor Pro Tem f M/Va t.%*UM loft January 15 , 1988 FOPJ4AL APPEAL GROUNDS z .�— YYY�.�Yi�� Y✓� •ram Huntington Beach City Council " 2000 Main St. �'"' Huntington Beach, Ca. 9264G Re: Appeal Grounds - Huntington Beach Planning Commis;Aoq of of New McDonnell-Douglas Construction Project Gentlemen: As the Management Company for Westminster Village Homeowners ' Association. attached is our check for $165 . 00 as an appeal filing fee on their behalf. You already have a copy of President Skorupski' s January 11 letter . (For your ready reference a copy is attached hereto. ) In addition to his letter we question the following : a) Under which of the Use Permits was this approved? b) We question the adequacy of the Environmental Impact Report in relation to the accumulative traffic impacts of the. McDonnell- Douglas Project , the Meadowlark Airport re-zoning and the Bolsa Chic& Project as well as the additional impycts of traffic on Rancho Road which was completely ignored . c) Standar s of El Zoning (under a 25 year old varianco) Additionally, Westminster Village is a community of 555 homes with approximately 1500 residents who is the closest residential community to this project. We are asking before Council ap�s roval is given to the McDonnell-Douglas Project that not only the &hove items but the masters addressed below be resolved . 1 . Due to increased traffic on Rancho Road at shift hour changes , we suggest widening Rancho Road and curbint it from Westminster Blvd, to Bolsa Chic& Road. 2 . A traffic light be added at the intersection of Rancho Road and Suffolk streets and a left turn arrow and a right trigger turn be added to the exi ting signal at Bolza Chica Road and St. James Rd. (our main entrance. ) A map is attached , showing our Village, the streets involved, etc . 1. Add/restore: the large trees on Rancho Road that have acted both as a sound/might buffer between our village and the McDonnell Douglas Site. F ,,o I Huntington Beach City Council January 15 , 1988 Page two i 5 . The exterior walla around our Village should be raised In height to minimize noise . Respectfully, H. M. RICHARDSON, Agent HMP,: BJ C 4 ti I i I i i T t l f" {r1j l i Y 1 l f 1 E I • a3 T; MRfT�111aT[�,��jCi14� pw E I V E Janis Yy 'I'll 1988 , City Council City of Huntington Beach 01V OF HUNTINGTON KACH 2000 Main Street CITY C(XjWj ,OF= Huntington Beach, Ca . 92648 Dear Sirs : This Association represents approximately 1500 residents of Westminster Village located within the Rancho Road-Bola& Chico-Westminster Blvd. triangle. Our community is the closest resLaintlai area to the proposed McDonnell-Douglas Construct on project at Bolsa Chic& and Bolsa Avenue . Our examination of the Draft EIR (DEIR 07-40 State Clearinghouse Number 87091615) shows that this rep-art is deficient in examining the impact of this project to our 111age . Specifically, no attention was paid to Traffic Plan on Rancho Road (between Bolsa Chica & Westminster) , no impact during construction was addressed, and the aesthetic impact of tree removal to appearance , sun glare , and noise in our residential area was not acknowledged . Most likely this was because our Community is just across the Huntin tots Beach-Westminster City boundry and probably does not appear on your City maps . With respect to the traffic flow (Section 3. 4 , Pagge 24) considerable McDonnell-Douglas traffic presently exists at shi#t chars a hours on Rancho Road. This is probably because Rancho Road provi es the closest access to Southbound I-405 (at Westminster and Springdale) . It is likely that a number of new employees at the proposed construction location will choose to use Rancho Road also , instead of going to the Golden Went - Bolsa Freeway entrance . The DEIR did not study traffic either on Rancho Road or at the Rancho Road-Westminster intersecr.ion. (Present, unrelated construction at McDonnell-Douglas along Rancho Road has tetsporarily altered commute patterns on that street , so a survey of Rancho Road today would not he representative of the traffic patterns that have Been established over the past 14 years) . Considering the proximity of our community to the construction site, we will be affected by construction noise and dust . No acknowledgement; of this was mentioned in the DEIR (Section 3. 7. 2 - page 41) . dlltK�ltf/�FIC[: OEM 1IV'L�I�A�!'tl,�Yl►'�3 � ��"'� +°" City Council of Huntington Beach January 11, 1987 Page two The proposed removal of large trees that presently shield our comrsunity from the proposed construction site (Section 3. 13 , Page 53) will introduce morning glare from the new building totters, increase: noise now buffered by the trees, and change the view in some of our residences from that of an open stand of trees to two large mirrored buildings . Please understand that this Association is not opposed to this construc- tion project. Rather, we feel that adequate attention must be given to our concerns before the project is approved. Therefore . we request the Huntington Beach City wouncil to either: 1) Withhold approval of the Planning Comission' s RecotusendAcions until these deficiencies in the O .E . I .R. are addressed , or 2) Schedule an appeal hearing before the City Council . We would appreciate being informed of what actions you choose to take so that we may adequately inform our reaidents . ep ideectfully, J S C. SKORUPI 1 , Pr nt JCS: BJC CC: All Directors City Council - Westminster E a 5000 WESTNIINST _ _ 17 _ ROI>< sT� K IJ ^+ r r^, rs ,^n A v1 h ny^ •�. �JI ra 7► +1 rt � w � r w th •rt • t �, 4022 r0 1M*{,y,ipttA = ROIMLA t111 i./ ` IG 1�2 it on �►+ ^ rn an I% an 10 ra 0,15 S Iir :. �11 ,,� ' •ct;•,�l 'c ! 1., .r it it .�i n •M h , `h p" tisC j +D , �A r roft w •� h „ h r'7 n en ^ A is �. w b rr ar►, ..JJ J ~ r1 I) II r' 1tQatMt Iv ?2 CI n n rn O •I ►� db � A�/ 1/l '� �► Ir 0� •OBI Jrd 6 w w ^`^•� ♦ •t •J� M w d fr 101 1C1 .. ;; ^ ^ R •' .; �♦ aye •�' ♦� �, � W � r► I► A on 0 0 0 0 0 ({{ ♦ ♦� N W .. •► n rr M � ♦ I` a ro I�ttl t�11 177 I► • ♦ • f112 �/ f \Sl♦ � ��111 " Its ` 11 a IraJ � O � � «- Sp1 •' r11r� •�� `ri✓ / v �<1j 1• 1� i � � n � •• '= f '~ �� 44 29 00 11t ► �3 '� r J •'IN Strap A t"•t�"1� •• a ,♦ +��0 at '!� 4P / t/�r y' J 1�t •• r+ � t) O •, Alf• La .'� �••., •r•. •/ f / J ♦ .'• ITi •t 112 p d�r + •, " r . \ •IO3 ♦ C*� "!�� .�',( t. ' �, h� /\11 `Y r o e 1 'n K SIC{ .,0/ r s .� r `R ,bill 0 •' a .+ " ' ✓ . a j i rr I �{ ,. ' .3 5 y3 •a O ?► 1 p !' i• `ILL•1 � « SIC ., '?j 7 � �,�'��:yO Ja f� ,1S O �i / �\a.4 It NY • i• f'�C� .p p�M .+ r )tp) •+ �.►,•' !ro .�h .• et' / �� I: �y I ll+j rl j'f•�•� /� Y. �1••�a •. (a •1 e ♦ • )I p ♦ ♦ 9 n J • 4 f •s•K � ri ,\1 )r .. )rtd !/ 1� �,f;,►�• •'•�>>. ! t J� - • '•� \ �r 1♦ i ^•�^I •i�1V ��r � �� V �t� .r i♦ i %\ • /:J�'>� � _f'�71'a 1 •� r� y'` WOOD loom '• a�1 •+h )f)f • ZJ',� i J•,e,/o•J• I p1a, 1� a1 T I.• •w41111 . y•+�'1►r =1 C h ••'0ri1 '��. I\' •• �'Va +O * �a. �� 1p i 1 `•�� '1`�O ^ %, f rr s+ a / 5,+• yy1,11 .^w! +w.. ^ •.r..♦�„r•..r.�•'�' A 1 a: v I \y}` ��+.vii'r•3•� . 1ja" I,i i 1a;\1 ��yti �� i• M��,ri. �.+^^^.�.r�� •,•\,> 1 yeti , J •3 „ .•r►• o1 o• • �15�`1 \.... r►►'' .. �Lr� f d � 1a 1y1y r �. C� 1a~• 1 f�tih1l� �r N t i\~s 'oisaor •>•1�• s,�aa ,�'�• . .+. •�ftie. ry�� /�/.1 � ,y '...yy"�� C t) ►• �w«+• w .Yt! 171.• . .r..a- ••M -«4r�r y,r r/•rn Q`�j.216 t .i. r - f'+ `1 ( �,.��1a11++1,. /��1y •1/� ..i,wwwwtiF+"•�•~..N'r nta�b �1 �� I / tCOt CC•Ot�O \.l ' t r�•r..+ r��t- NO 1 7!> �:r•r fr i,.♦w a 1�P♦ r 1 rtiY� y •�. _•�.:� ca 1 AIMS Mr ..a •.��„ 6 -MA IAP1 ON •c. • � sZ •• � wr• • wi•r r•he.MN LA.r•• , ' •+ tih• � ~r► yOf •1' ,`'71 /1 � n.�.w rwrM ... �,,•,• • 1.^•- • REV C C'OC71 c It r 1 •1 . . , a� t. 14140 - JI t 1, ♦ 1 t=_ a / . it/;ti•y : ••� �` ,,.%� —W DISTRICT 116 -_� ' r �s $200 BLACKPOOL RW►0 w1st"g1"[01 CA Mill.4143 (714) ""363 January 8 , 1988 JAN 13 � City Council r CI�OF HUPtT1NGTC` � City of Huntington Beacl C��F C ( i ,N6 2000 Main Street U.1NCk. pFFICF. Huntington Beach, Ca. . Dear Sirs : It has come to the attention of the Associaticn that McDonnell- Douglas id presently moving it ' s rear exit road to it' s plant so that ;t will meet Rancho Road near to or across from Suffolk Street (Westminster) , the rear entrance to our Village . This could create a 4-way intersection with no traffic light or stop signs . This Association is anxious to prevent employees of McDonnell-Douglas from using the residential sCrects of our 4illa8e As a mesrs of entering or exipting the plant each day . We understand that no City Permit was issued to Allow this work. We know that no hearings or notice given to us related to the road work. In addition, this work already in progress caused removal of a row of large Eucalyptus trees that acted both as a visual buffer and noise barrier between our horses that face Rancho Road and the (noisy) heating/power plant on McDonnell-Douglas property. i This Association requests that the City of Huntington Beach order an imediate stop to all work until such tine as hearings Are held related to the traffic impact on Rancho Road b Suffolk Street , noise project is examined inry this abatement , and environmental impact of p ,� detail. , or until the .exit is restored to its original location . and the trees replaced . Respectfully, (-JJZES C. SKOR PSKI . e s i d e n t JCO5 : BJC cc: . Huntington Beach Planning Commission a F— KLIMIESIMICt! f L' 71 City of Huntington Beach 4i 20M &WN STREET CALIFORNIA 000 WAI{tMENT Of COIrAAtJNttY tDEVEl01'MENt 1 Dow" pi.AM 5*U41 How, I nt I Dive S36-5342 TINnn. y divis+aw 33iS871 January 28, 1935 I Westminster Village Homeowners Association 4100 Blackpool Road Westminster, California 92693 Attention: James C. Skorupski SUBJECT: RECENT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AT MC DONNELL-DOUCLAS Dear Mr. Skorups;-i: Your letter dated January 8, 1998 regarding the recent excavation and tree removal on Rancho Road has been referred to me for follow-t;p. I have discussed the n,.vr road with the C.ity's Traffic Engineer, 13ru,:o Gilmer. fir. Cilmer Ind!cated to me that he has been working with the City of Westminster staff to resolve Toth technical concerns and Che concerns addressed by the adjacent residents. It is my understanding that Vest Coast university will be submitting a conditional use permit in the near future. At that time, the City will require a public hearing allowing for input from all interested persons concerning .he proposed university, new road, and other issues related to this property. In response to your concern regarding the removal or large eucalyptus trees located along Rancho Road, I have been told that the planning staff will recommend that the trees be replaced at a t to I ratio at such time that the project is reviewed by/ the Planning Commisslon. This review will also Include the other concerns addressed In your letter initialing noise, traffic, and environmental issues. The Department of Public Works has informed me that a "Stop-Work" notice. u as Issued to McDonnell-Doz4las on December 19, 1987, The Stop work notice prohibits the property owner from continuing any work on the road until such time that the project has been reviewed ano approved by the City of Huntington teach. I If you should have any additional questions regarding this matter, ple4.ie do not hesitate to call me at 536-3271. Sincerely, Mi heel Strange fit Associate Planner F-14 � lliS:t►ar TL_A AT" 04, 4159T r MCCNDfWVf-rL . C OWL44LTY V001PIANY f8W Yam fi wme AA01M6 Uft QW.bMfa,6A A"(04 M104 January 27, 1988 .,..�...�_.,.. SEACH Mr. Milo Adams Planning Division CITY OF HUNTINCTON BEACH 2000 Main Street ". J. E�x ;�.�! Muntingtcn Beach, CA 92648 �a<< 2ch. Cbp'' Aeference : McDonnell Douglas Office Complex Boisa Avenue a Bolea Chica Road Subject: Response to Appeal. of Planning Commission Decision Regarding Approval. of the Referenced Project Dear Mike : j We have been informed that the January 5th decision of the j Huntington Beach planning commission, which unanimously approved our referenced project . has keen appealed. We were provided with copies of the two appeals, and would like to take this opportunity to respond to the issues raised . The appeal by the City of Westminst.e: , dated January lt, , 1988s focuses on concerns of increased traffic resulting from this project . Specifically, the City of Westminster has identified several intersections in their letter of December 23rd that they feel will be significantly impacted by our project , to response to this letter , the project traffic consultant , Weston Pringle Associates, prepared an analyser: of those intersections to evaluate actual impact . This analyses , dated December 29, 1.987 , concludes that the intersections will require improvement to ope.:ate at accaptab3e service levels withoat our pr,:jeet: . it also identifies that the traffic contribution from our project , based on a "worst case" profile , ranges from one to bbven percent- ( I - 7% ) contribution . .n light of this informatin.n, McDonnell Douglas Realty Company agreed to PlanninS staff ' s suggestion to contribute to a fund to improve these intersections, to the extent that trrff.ic was generated from out project , we felt that this was in heepi.ng with Westminster ' s December 23rd letter , which sta':ed: . . . we feel that appropriate mitiga-ion should either be direct payment for public improvements to the above mentioned intersections to increase their capacities , or contribution to a fund to pay for these improvements . " F Onk A t»#01A pr OF � - �cao+�rwr�a l , Mike P.dams City of Huntington Beach January 27 , 1988 Page Two Ile feel it important to stress our committment to accept responsibility for traffic impact related to this project and mitigate J t t. ►ell . However , the City of Westminster setter of Dccemb2r 31st , and their appeal of January 14th , suggests that this project. should pay for all improve:.:2nt costs , which we feel is somew;la t 3 ack i ng in fairness . t•lith rcgr.:d to the appeal .rom V.1-IR Property Managemer.t on behalf of the Westminster Village Nome ,wners Association (and the referenced letter :)y Mr . Shorupski , President of the Association ) , there appears to be s.--m.e mi snnderstanCing of what our project represents in terns of impact to this group . First of all , during the initial phase of developr..en.t , we worked with the City Planning staff to determine the most appropriate process under which to file our applica*. ion . As you know, it was decided that the Conditional Use Permit format was most appropriate , and that the City legal department agreed that the Ma (multi-story) suffix was -?�ppl icablA got this pr ojec•. . 'This shoul d address the conceri;s ident i f i ed as "A" and in the Aapellant ' s letter . The issues regarding itc7 "C" , as well as items 1, 2, 3 , and 5 ( item 4 is apparently missing ) are issues that are baszd on the i mis�unders:and ng referred 'Co . When the project was in conceptual design stages , several meetin.czs ieore field with City Planning , Enginec:ing, and Traffic to identify optimum circulation and traffic patterr=s for the project and to manage t^-affic interfa--e with City streets , Aster mush '3 : scussion and va.—locs site plan :-evision, , the site design was finalized to direct and receive the bulk of traffic at B3 lsa Avenue , and to promote site egress oritc Bolsa in aii eastbound direction . Once this decision was made , further traffic studies were conducted in cooperation with City of Nunt i ng';.on Fact:h Traffic Engi ne.ri ng . These studies focus;d on interse.:tions that, would be measureably impacted, as detor~ined by the various traffic engineers involves . The primary reason that Rancho Road was nut studied in depth was because the site location selection and traffic design was developed to minimize traffic ne:th of the project . Therefore, no measureable impact srsuld occur . F ap 30 , Make Adamb City of Runt ington Beach Jenuary 27, 1988 Page Th7ce The concerns that are being e-p.ensed by the ?*ppellant relat .ve to Rancho Road are founded in current traffic patt:esns related to peak, hour traffic movement from the McDon:.el : Douglas Astronautic ; 1Isci : ily (tr,WXI . We have been advised by the astronautics group that.- 1,&,hF.ures are underway to relocate tlje primary Rancho Road ingress and egress point from its current local- ion across from Suffolk i: o a more northerly l:oint adjacent. to t•SDAC ' s northerr. property boundary . ':him appears to be an effective solu . ion for moving traffic north from the facility to the 405 Freeway without affecting the hom(-owners, use of Suffolk and Rancho goad . We tinders and a] .,a -.hat this plan was de%,eioped at;i Planning and Traffic Department part ,�.cipat. ion . It remains important to note that the concerns reined regarding Rancho Road are not directly i-lated to our project . but are based on existing conditions which are presently being improvvd . The P.ppelant ,also que.. _ions in Item " W' the adequacy of the E. I . R . relative to "t ::e accumulati► ? traffic impacts of the McDonnell Dou-glas project , the ticadowl sir); Ai rrioi r and the Tao: sa chIca (Wetlands ? ) Project". As i s clearly indicated in the traffic reports prepared by Weston Pringle , all pro3ected traffic from there devel opinents as well as Pot ^nt i al Tutu.a t .of f ie frog. McDonnell Douglas ' 66-nacre SILL, on Springdale were included . This was norposefully donc to orovi a ' look" into the future traffi - situation in the area , and allow tirm- :cr planning and irnplementarion of imarove^entts . Thant. you for this opportunity: to present our thoughts , and we l ool; forward to any or rue_:t i on s . si nce:el y' r t. rle Pautsc•1 V. P . Deve1cpment rIGP/l t tic 4W . 31 K' t d� � a � ! A 1 * PWeahs , , , J. N 6 t9A P ` U TRAFFIC 8 TR/FNBPCflf7►1'IBNNdINEEI�IING Janua ,y 25, 191B Mr. Mike Adams Planning DiviFion City of Huntington Beach 2000 Ma.tn Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear He. Adams: We have reviewed the letters from the City of lies ti..:aster arrd the Westminstee Village Home owner' s Asscciation and the Ferp-1 Appeal from Prepert; Maiagerient, Inc. relative to the McDonnell Douglas project. ,nis letter is to respond to the triffic slated items -in those dc.culnents . The 1 Eater from the City of Westminster refers to a letter dated December 19117, outlining the areas of concern. We discussed the concerns of the City of Westminster w', th their City Engineer, Neal Thompson, and expanded our analyses tr4 include the Bolsa Chico Road/Garden Grove Boulevard and Garden Grove- 405-22 Ramps intersection ;%s a result Gf that discussion.. A letter was submitted to the City of Nuntington Beach on December 29, 1987, which addressed Oese intersections ant; � the potential impact of the McDonnell Douglas project. These analyses indicated existing problems which wa::ld worsen with currently approved but not constructed projects . They also indicated relatively minor impacts due to the lirponnell Drugal s pro,j xt. The December 31 , 1987, letter from Westminster indentifies mitigation meaaures at three intersections which have been addressed in our analyses. Certain improvements are i dent if and cost estimates provided. While our studies have not atteripted Co apportion costs , it has been noted that these are eAtsting deficiencies which will be worsened :y other protects. The McDonnell Douala-: pro34ct will, only have a minor impact on these intersections as identified in our analysts. F -4 y :Ebt EAST CMOMAN .AVEME EWE 10 a FULLOTON. w,Al.II�dANtA l 31 (T1a1 �t1• 9.71 -z- The Property 1inageme► t, Inc. i ornial Appeal Grounds dated January 15, 1988, states that other projects such as the Meadowlark Airport re-zoning and the Bolsa Chica Project were not included in the analyses . These were included as discussed urtaer "Other Area Projects" 5tginning on ,rage 3 of our Novemtrer 25, 19U, letter report on this develoWent. The majority of the comments in the letter from Property Management, Ire. and the Westminster Vi 1 lage Nonv.owne, s Association relate to Rancho Poad. This street was discussel with Huntington Bzach Traffic Engineer, Bruce Gilmer, at our• initial meeting. Existing traffic concerns on Rancho Road were discussed and identified. As a result, the Mcponnotll Douglas project at Solsa Chica and Bolsa was planned and designed to direct traffic away from Rancho Road. The prin:ipal access to the project will be a signalized interse.-tion on Bolsa Avenue. This will direct project traffic easterly on Bolsa Avenue to Springdale or other north- south routes. Tne traffic that is ex,►ected to utilized Bolsa Chica would have urigins or destinations to tie north or west and not be attracted to Rancho road. As a result of these cons;derations , the study did not assign any project generated traffic to Rancho, Road. The concerns expressed appear to relate to existing conditions on Ra - _-,o :Road which should be addressed by the f'ity, the existing McDonnell Douglas operations and the City of Westminster. i We trust that these responses will be of assistance to you . If you have any ,,.restions , pease contact us. Wespectfully submitted, WESTON PR INGL E & ASSOCIATES Weston S. Pringle. P.E. Reg i stored Professional Er►ji near State of California Nux6ers C16828 TR565 0133 cc. Paul Ponta WSP:hl d #871060 A W FN T huntington beach departnnnt of community dtvolonnlent ff TO: Pl,,aninq Comaisnion ' FROM: Cemrnunity Development DATE: January 5 , 1988 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 87•-44/CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 87-95/TEKTA TIVE PARCEL MAT' 87-424/ENVIRONMENTAL 1MPACT REPORT NO. 87-4 harLI 1"T,: McDonnell-Douglas Realty Co. 2AT ACCLEM: 18881 Von Kerman kve September 23, 1987 Suite 1200 Irvine, CA 92715 WDAMRY P OCESSLUL-D&TE: i September 23 , 1988 QWNER : McDonnell-Douglas Corporation ZON : MI-A (Limited Manufacturing District) &EQUEST: Mixed use office complex encompassing 604 , 982 Qrug t PLA11: General square feet Industrial LQCATIQN: Northeast corner of ggrfil.ING US Vacant. Boisa Avenue and Bolse Agriculture Chica Street ` ,&CREAG • 18 . 4 acres Certiff Environmental Impact Report No. 87-4 and approve Conditional Use Permit No . 87-441 Conditional Exception (Viriance) No. 8795 and Tentative Parcel Map 87-4 24 with findings and conditions of rj�proval . Stafi further recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution 1387 sorting forth the permitReh use! in this mixed use development . �Q GEIYERAL.._ZJ111DSZdTZ`• 't Conditional Use Permit No. 87-44 is a request to permit the development of a 604* 982 square foot mixed•usa development , The subject property is located at the northeast corner o£ Dols& Avenue and Boleti Chico Street. The site is approximately 18 acres in size and will be developud by the McDonnell-Douglas Corporation, the current owners of the property. The proposed project will include an 8 and i2 story office building as well as 2 restaurantso a support retail building and parking facilities for 2, 524 vehicles Vq N a to Conditional Exception (Variance) NO - 87-95 i setback to allow d more than 50 percent Of the required front yard be for surface parking . T nt�tivK Parcel Map 87-424 is a request to create seven parcels on e the 18 .4 acre site . GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General(Limited rtManufacturing District) ZONE: K1 LAND USE : Vacant , Agriculture Nhrkh and�a��f S � iew� p�t]C% DESIGNATION: General Industrial GENERAL L pLAIi r• MI--A (Limited Hanufa9 District) ZON •• McDonnell-Douglar fcility LAN,+ USE : rial GENERAL PLAN DESIGNAT100: M1nAr 'LimftedtManufacturing District) ZOOE: TndustrA.al buildings LAND USE : bcE��X; City of Seal Beach ws _ —� Seal Beach NAval weapons Center t rrltlrMFNTAL 5��• In acc ordar..e with the California Environmenet,11 Qutoity Actanalyze the Environmental Impact Report No • A7'4 was p outlined poten tial impIrws of the proposed MCDonn�slllowedssa Use project . The requisite procedure that was below: 2 1987 Staff conducted an initial study Septemberdetermined that an S for the project . 1987 A Notice of Pxeparationnotiffip blictofthe September 11. Stste Clearinghouse to Y Mn EIR- inkent to prepare rt i 435 F4WAP 1 "6 C�iso�) Istaff Repo , I September 15 , 1987 to Notice of Completion filed with State December 4 , 1987 Clearinghouse, draft EIR available for public reviaw and corneat for thirty dayp : (Co..inent pericid : 12/4/87-1/2/88) . January 5 , 1988 Public hearing before Planning Commission Eo certify Environmental Impact Report No . 87-4 . Comments and responses regarding DEIR 87-4 will be distributed to Planning Commission members prior to the public hearing and will be included as an appendix ir, the Final EIR . pQ_L .n3.ial 1M2Ar_J1_a13d Mitigation Medsyx-ex he dr3Et EIR it, should be noted that a "r�nesrase� In reviewing t scenario" for the proposed project vas analyzed . For axample, traffic generation numbers from general office uses were utilized instead of a single us►t such as McDonnell.-Douglas corporate office , and no mitigation measures were assumed . Traffic generation projections from undeveloped McDonnell-Douglas land, Meadowlark Airport and the nolsa Chica YA-ere also included in the analysis . As noted in DEIR 87-4 , potentially significant impacts were identified with regard to circulation and sewage . The mitigation measures that are recommended by staff ( see attached conditions of approval ) will negate or reduce to an acceptable level any potential adverse impacts from the project . The proposed project (or any development of leas intensity) may not actually generate the severity of the impacts that have been analyzed . However , it can be assumed thwt any lesser impacts will be more than adequately mitigated with the measures V:opoacd . This in in accordance with CEQh Guidelines . The proposed project ' s major impacts and staff ' s recommended mitigation measures are briefly discussed below. Assuming a general office type of use , the proposed amount of development would generate approximately 7 , 046 trips per day. Weston Pringle► Traffic Consultants concluded that even when assuming worst case traffic projections from the project , the project itself would only contribute between five and ten percent of the peak hour volume traffic at the fiv-.` intersections studied . Because McDonnell-Douglas , a single user, will occupy the buildings , the traffic impacts will actually be leas than that assumed in the EIR . With the mitigation measures recommended by staff including the utilization of a transportation System Management plan and some infrastructure Vproveraanira, traf f iC impacts from the proposed project will be .educed to an acceptablo 1we1 . Mitigation meanures which are included as •udgested conditions of approval in this !staff report are Coaditions 1(c) , i(a-a) , 7(b) , g (a) , 12 , 13 and 14 . staff Report, - The propo.F-; project is projected to generate approximately 110 , 400 gallons of sowrge effluent per day. This constitutes a 54 percent increase over that amount which was planned for by the Or.ang,% County Sanitation District . This 54 percent sowage generation increase from the subject site is offset, however, by the fact that the 66 acre: parcel of McDonnell-Douglas land along Springdale is vacant and Is not generating any sewage . The Orange County Sanitation Distric,4 originally planned for 71 , 470 gallons of effluent per day to be generated from the subject. 10 . 42 acr4 site , and 256, 000 gallons per day to be produced from the 66 acre site (3 , 880 gallons/acre) . The total effluent planned for from the two sites equals 327,470 gallons per day. According to the Orange County Sanitation Diptrict ' s master plan, even with the development of the pr.opo3ed project , the overall McDonnell-Douglas complex will have a sewage capacity surplus of 217 , 000 gallons per day . In light of this, staff recommends that the proposed project be permitted to utilize sewerage capacity credits from the vacant 66 acre site. At tnis time , McDonnel ? -Douglas has no immediate plans to pursue development on the 66 acre site. The Orange County Sanitation District will make a decision this spring on how to pursue upgrading their existing facilities . It. is probable that by the time the 66 acre site is developed, the existing capacity constraint: of the Slater Pump Station will have been addressed . In any event, development of the 66 acre site will require review by both Clty staff and Orange County a:nitation Districts staff . The Orange County Sanitation District supports stnff ' s reconmr3ndation regarding the transfer of sewage credits . Mitigation measures included as suggested condLtions of epproval in this staff report are Conditions 17 ai,.0 19 . Draft EIR 87-4 adequately analyzes the potential environmental Q Y P � impacts of the proposed McDonnell -Douglas Mixed Use project . Therefore , staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve and certify the document . The Planning Commission has the responsibility of detertiJ ning that the Final EIR has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the State FIR Guidelines prior to making a decision on the project . 0 STATUS : Not applicable . Not applicable. �► . Q SPfiCI IC Pik: Not applicable . The SubdiviStOn Committee reviewed Tentative Parcel May 87-424 on December 28, 1987 . The parcel map Creates seven parcels on the 15 .4 acre site. Staff Report - 1/5/80 -4- l9ESOd) • �.s.Q_..,.��5i�1 BEY I E�1 NQAA[s_: . The Design Review Board (DRB) reviewed the proposed site plan , fluor plans .nd building elevations an November 1Q , 1987 . The URB requested that the building er.tries be further articulated . The Board also discussed tha proposed landscape plan and voted to requira the Phase I landscape to include all perimeter landscaping along Bolsa Avenue and Boles Chic& Street. The elevations and building materials for the ph& king - '.r.ucture and the two restaurants will be reviewed by the Board prior co the issuance of building permits . LQ. Q ._, ISSU25 AND ANAtLjf=: ""for a O.g wit Z.smiag Qrdinance The following mat4ix sets forth the project 's compliance with the M1-A Zoning District standards : SAC-ti4r] Luke Hain red =2oged 9510 .02(a) Min . Parcel Size 20 , 000 sq . ft . 801, 504 sq . ft . 9510 . 02(b) Min . Frontage ion ft, . 11080 ft . 9510 . 04 Max . Building Neigbt 250 ft . (Use 154 ft . (s story) Variance 433 ) 208 ft . ( 12 story) 9510. 06 ( 3 ) Front Yard Setback 20 f t . A. 1 f t . for each 1 ft . ov"r 35 ft . 149 ft. (8 story) 214 ft . (8 story) 203 ft . 012 story) 214 ft . ( 12 story) 5510 . 06 ( 4 ) 50% of required setback used for parking 74 ft . of parking OCB 87-95 for 154 (8 story) feet of surface 101 ft . of parking parking in front ( 12 story) of each building. 9510 . 06 (2) Parking Structure 30 ft . 86 f;. . Setback 9510 . 0 6( 1) Restaurant Setback 20 ft . 50 ft . 9608(a) Landscape 6% .rot site area 20% not site area 648190 sq. ft . 154 , 450 sq . ft. 9608 b Parking Lot 1 tree/10 spaces 2 treel4 npacen 50 trees 132 tkeas 9609(c) perimeter Landscape 10 fit. 30 to 50 ft . 33 Staff loport - 1/5/60 -5- (9650d) � Sct:iQn Resuired Pro osed 9600 Parking Phase 1 213 * 253 Civided by 300 711 22 , 575 divided by 1,000 13 7400 divided by 60 117 851 1, 09E (-245 s?aces) Parking Phase II 322, 973 divided by, 35n a 923 22, 578 divided by 1000 = 23 7, 000 divided by 60 a 117 9 , 600 divided by 60 - ___... A 1, 111 10479 (+36W spaces) Total Parking 213 , 253 divided by 300 = 711 322, 973 divided by 350 w 923 450156 divided by 1, 000 46 14 , 000 divided by 60 w 234 9, 600 divided by 200 1 , 962 2, 524 ( +562 spaces) kj_QjAct, pest tAnn The proposed project is a mixod-use office complex that includes an sigh --story anti a twelve-.story office tourer as well, as two restaurants , a Support retail building and a three-level parking 34 Staff Repoct 1/5/66 —i� tl4Sod) • I•N.1 structure . The entire project will include a total of 6� ., 982 (moss square feet as outlined below; 8 .story office building 235 # 831 sq. ft . 1.2 story office building 345 # 551 rq. ft . restaurant 7 , 000 sq. ft . restaurant 7 , 000 sq. Le . support retail building 91600 sq. It . 604 , 982 sq. ft . The two office towers art, situated on a 45 degree angle to bolsa Avenue and Bolsa '.hica Street. ;he towers are set back approzi.. itely 200 feet frcm the street . The buildinys have a mo6ern architectural style which includes a curtain wall of blue glaxing with contrasting spandrels at the lower levels of the building tnd a brushed aluminum :-of . The two single-story restaurants, which will be located at the north and southwest corn^ra of the site, will have an architectural style that Ls compatible with the office towers . A large pedestrian plazas connects the two office towers . Also included in the project is a single story support retail building (9 , 600 square feet) which can be rear:hed from Cie pedestrian plaza and from within the parking structure . The uses proposed within the support building include a KCDonnell-Douglaz credit union, newspaper and magazine sales and office supplies . The uses are not intended to Nerve th,- general public, but will provide a convenience for the tenenrs of the office towers . A complete list of the uses allowed within this project are contained in Draft Planning Commission Resolution 1387, attached to this staft report . Parking for the project ws. 11 ultimatftly include 494 on-grade spaces i and a three-level parking structure located on the eastern portion of the site . The on-grade spaces will primarily serve the two restaurants and p• ovide visitor parking "or the office towers . Pre" ;rided within tb2 structure is a t .?tal of 2, 030 parking spaces . ( 1 , 118 full-sized graces and 813 compact spaces . ) The Huntirnton J Beach ©tdinance Coda requires a total of 1, 962 packing spaces . Tho I proposed project includes 2 , 524 parking spaces , 562 spaces in ozcess of Code requirements . Primary access to the three-level parking structure is from Bolsa Avenue . The structure can also be accessed from a secondary project entry along Bolsa Chira Street . The parking structure will features architectural style and Colors which are compatible with the office towers. The City` s Design Review Board (DRB) will review and approve the architecture of the parking structure prior to the issuance of building permits . Fw- 40 Staff Report - 1/5/0a -7- (liSOdj The aipplican proposer to construct the project. in two phases . Phase One , which includes the northern 10 .25 acres of the site, will consist of the following development. : i 8 story office building 235, 831 sq . ft . restaur.int pad .,__J.AJQJ sq . ft . 242, P31 sq . ft . 1 , 096 surface parkip.g spaces It is anticipated that McDonnell Douglas employes will occupy the entire eight-story office building , excluding the first level which will be leased to other businesses such as engineers who work closely with McDonnell-Douglas on their government contVACtx . The applicant has made a minor chango in the proposed phasing of thw project since the time that t:ie Draft EIR was circulated for the 30-day review peiiu'. Phase I construction will not include the construction of a p r4on of the parking structures or the support retail Wilding . P. king for Phase I will be entirely on-grade. As shown on the attached site plan, the on-grade parking for Phase I will number 1 , 096 sp3ce3 ( 682 full sire spaces , 414 compact spaces) . The Huntington Beach Ordcnatire Code requires 851 spaces for Phase I development . The proposed project will provide 2,15 spaces in Excess of cede requirements. The surface parking area on the eastern portion of the site where the Phase I I parking stz:ucture will ultimately be built wi'.1 be :striped to accommodate landscape planters betwer-.% the. opposing 'Lanes of parking sta:._s . At this time , the applicant %1 1 ?. not install the parking lot landscaping In this specific area . Ratner , as part of Phase I construction , the applicant will provide the full perimeter landscaping along Belsa Chica Street and Bolsa Avenu6 . The parking lnt situation will be reviewed on an annual basis by t`%e Planning Director in light of McDonnell-Dcuglas proposed scheduling for the development of Phase 11 . Therefore, should at and time McDonnell-Douglas decide not to go forward with Phase II , the Planning Director could require the proper landscape be installed in that portion of the parking lot. The applicant hsa indicated that Phase It construction may quickly follow Phase I construction . Should this be the case, the applicant, through the above mentioned condition, would be spared theexpense of landseaVin^ a temporary surface parking lot. Phase It construction will consist of the following development on the southern a . 17 acres of the site: 12 story office tower 3450551 sq. ft . Restaurant pad E, 000 sq . ft . Support retail building 9.fl 0 sq . ft . 362, 151 aq . ft . Parking xtrueture! with 2 030 parking etpacea 41 • Staff Report 1�5/ad � �9- (96sod) Thb parking structure, inrJ uding a total of 2, 030 parking spaces , as well as the support retail building, will be constructed as purt of Phase II . Prior to the issuance of building permits for the 12 story office building or the parking structure, the applicant must prepare an interim Parking plan to insure that adequate parking is available for tho 8 story building while the remainder of the site is under construction. EW1QYMaRL As noted in Draft EIR 87•-4 , Full development �.f the project is expected to genrate 2 , 102 jobs . It is estimated by McDonnell -Dosiglas that 451**' employees will come from overcrowded facilities on the site and from the adjar3nt industrial park area where the company is presently leasing 500 , 000 square feet of office and industrial space . At the present time , the Huntington Beach McDonnell-Dcuglas facility has approximately 7 , 600 employees ( 7 , 300 on-site and 300 in the adjacent industrial area) . Full development of the project will increase the total number of en,ployeas to 9 , 252 (7 , 600 + ( 20 102 - 450 ) = 9 , 251 ) . Historical employment dat#L.rfurnished by HcDonnelI-Douglas , indicates that the total number of employees on the site has been as high as 9 , 300 in 1969 . Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 87-95 is a request to permit more than 50 percent of the required front yard setback area to be used for Surface parking . The MI-A standards require the 8 and 12 story building to be set batik 149 feet and 203 raet , respectively. The buildings are both setback 214 feet from Bolsa Chica Street . The code allows a maximum of 74 feet in front of the 8 story building and 101 feet in front of. the 12 story building ( 50 percent of required setback area ) to be used fcr parking . The site plan depicts 154 feet of the area in front of the buildings to be used for sur,ace parking. ( It should be noted that the fil-A standards envisioned 40 foot high buildings with a 20 foot setback. If this site had a M5 (Multi -Story) suffix attached , the required building setbacks would be 61 and 67 feet , with no restriction as to the parcent.:ge of parking in front of the building . ) Because of the extensive landscape planters provided along Holsa Chica Street and Bolsa Avenue, which range from 30 to 50 feet in width, and the provision of landscape matrials on-situ which greatly exceed all code requirements , staff supports the request for a conditional exception. The Design Review Board also concurs with staffs position . j Staff Report i 2 QiAQL Ent-it .ment The subject property is zoned KI-A, Limited Manufacturing District . Permitted uses in this district include administrative , management, regional or headquarter offices for any permitted industrual use which are not primarily intended to serve the public . Section 9510 . 14 of the Nut►tiny_on Beach Ordinance Code allows for rained use developments to be constructed in this zone subject to the approval of a conditional use permit . A mixed use development includes restrictea types of retail , commercial , office and service usas which, because of their operation or space needs, should more appropriately be located within a light industrial development . The total floor area of the mixed uses cannot exceed 35 percent of the original gross floor area of all buildings . Prior to the approval of a conditiond .l use permit , the planning Commission must approve a resolution which sets forth the allowable :nix of uses in the development . The uses and square footages are set forth in Draft Resolution No. 1367 , attached to this staff report . I In 1961 , the planning Corwtission approved Use Variance 433 allowing structures of up to 250 feet in height to be built on a portion of the McDonnell-Douglas property. For this rebson, the applicAnt is not requesting a zone change to place the MS (Multi-Story) suffix on this parcel . However , the project , as designed , meets all dosigrt standards contained in the multi-story ordinance . The 66 acre parcel located at the northwest corner opt Springdale and eolsa Avynue was not included in Use variance 433 . Previous entitlements for this property included a zone change to have the 145 su t added to the property. The McDonnell-Douglas prol:ert;, is also designated as a high rise node in the City' s General Plan . The proposed project is to be located on property that is zoned and general planned for this type of use . The site is designated as a high-ri.se node in the iCity' s General Plan. The project is compatible with adjacent land uses and the ozisting McConnell--Douglas Astronautics facility. Staff recommends that the Manning Commission certify Environmental Impact Report No . b7-k and further recommends that the Commrission approve Conditional Use Permit No . 87-44 , Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 87-95 and Tentative Parcel Map 87-424 with the following findinose and Conditions of approval and adopt Draft Resolution No . 1.387 . WAW*( iitaft Ripon - I/Stet --la- ( 9650d) N I N99 Fo; A EPROYAL_-_.5+.'Q9z QNAIt_ USL� P 1' T_ �L. 87-�i� AW CONDITIONAL_X CEarrn,N (YARTA=) NO , 07-95: I. The iroposed need use project , with conditions of approval $nd mitidatioN measures identified in EIR 97-4 , will not have a detrimental efiect upon the geneL!ai health, welfare, safety and convenience of persons residing or working in the neighborhood , nor will it by detrimental to the value of property and improvements in the vicinity . z . The proposed mixed use office project which include 55 percent of the gross floor area of the buildings to be used as corporate office headquarte.s is consistent with the MI-A Zoning District; and the General Plan Land use designation of General I ndust;:i a l . 3 . The proposed mixed use office project is compatible with existing and proposAd uses in the vicinity which include general industrial ,to the south , Seal beach Naval Weapons Cente : to the west and the McDonnell-Douglas Astronautics Facility to th-: north and east . 4 . The location , site layout , and design of the proposed mixed use office project properly adapts the proposed structures to streets , driveways and other adjacent structures in a harmonious manner . Project entries , deceleration lanes and changes to the existing medians in Bolsa Chica Street and Bolsa .%venue have: been properly designed by a Traffic Engineer in order to mitigate impacts rn the existing circ::irtion system.,. 5 . The combination of the proposed uses on the site, as set forth in Draft Resolution No . 1387, are properly integrated on the site . b . Access to and parking for the proposed mixed use office project will not create undue traffic problems . The new traffic signal on Bolsa Avenue at the main entry to the project will encourage employees to use this entrance . The spend raR.p on the east- side of the parking structure will facilitate orderly ing%'ess and egress from the parking structure . 7 . The granting of Conditional Exception (Variance) No . 87--95 to allow for more than 50 percent of the front yard setback to be used for parking will be offset by the provision of landscape on the site far in excess of code requirements , insuring that the project will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare or injurious to the conforming land, property or improvements in the neighborhood . r A c t 8 . Exceptlon.71 circumstances (the granting of the Use V rian..® for building heights up to 250 feet ) do not apply goRnermilr to 1 property in the tame district . Staff nepa re (0650d) I 9 . The granting of Conditional Exception (Variance) go . 07-95 is necessary for the preserv4tion of Pnd enjoyment of subrtantial property t•tght u . F1hDINS QF APPEQYAL _=TF.NT TIME I!hRCEL HP 17-424 i I . The proposed nubdiv .s•lon of 7 parcels for purposes of industrial use is in compliance with the size and shape of property necessary for that type of developmeiit . 2 . Tha General Plan has set forth provisions for this type of land use as well as setting forth objectives for implementation of this type of uae3 . 3 . The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use et the time the land use designation of general industrial allowing for corporate offices and the high rise node designation allowing for multi-story buildings was placed on the sub) ,�ct property . 4 . The size, dept'. , frontage, street width and other design and improvement features of the proposed subdivision are proposed to be constructed in compliance with standard plans snd s?ecifications on file with the City as well as in compliance with the State Map Act and supplemental City Subdivision Ordinance . =D.IIIONS O : WAL tRS7MZ IT ANAL USE pLRMIT NQ. 82-44 AN =I =T Q NAL =C L f.T tQN '�1Ig 1 . The site plan received and dated December 29 , 1987 . at-all Ne revised depicting the modifications described herein: a . Additional stairwells shall be provided within the parking structure pet Fire Department requirements . Three stairwells shall be added to the east side and one stairway shall be added to the west side . b. Full size parking stalls on-grade shall be dimensioned as 17 feet by 9 feet -:it: a 2 foot overhang . Additional 2 feet shall be added to the landscape planter for t. iisi overhang area . c. A deceleration lane along Balsa Avenue shall be provided at the project ' s major entry . The length and design of the deceleration lane shall be subject to the review and approval of the Public wor; ..j Department. d , Building shall be accessible on two (2) sides by way of roadways ( fire lanes) not less than twenty-seven (27) feet in widthe with adequate turning radii . Roadway (fire lanes) shall be not be lexs than 'ten (10) feet at more than thirty (30) 'feet from building , . IrI r* lanes Ahall provide, is access to a minimis of 50 percent of the ground floor F+ perimeter of the buildings . . j -I staff Mpart - U5184 e. A dedicAted Eire lane shall be provided on all.. sides of the parking structure. Fire lanes are for emergency access any! must be a minimum of twenty-four ( 24 ) feet in width. 2 . The elevations received and dated December 29 , 1967, shall be revised depicting the modification describod herein: a . Greater architecturel cam hasis of the building base and P 9 building entrance shall be provided . The final elevations shalt be sobject to the review and approval of the Design Review Board . 3 . Prior to the issuance of a grading plan, the applicant shall submit - hydcology report for review and approval of the Public Works Department . a . Prior to the :ssu3nce of building permits for Phase I , 8-story office building (excludinq grading and foundation permits) , the applicant shall submit the Following documents for the review and approval of Department of Public Works and Community Development : a . Soils analysis , prepared by a registered soils engineer . This analysis shall include on-site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recorrsnendations regarding grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations , retaining walls , streets and utilities . b. Grading plan c: . & Laniircape and Irrigation Plan. The Preliminary Landscape Plan , received and dated October 28 , 1987 , shall be revised depicting the modifications described herein: ( 1 ) Of the sixty 36" box ; Ccent trees Indicated in the applicant ' s preliminary landscape plan, twenty be upgraded to 48" box size ( this would include the 8 exi.stinq cgral trees to be relocated) . K ( 2) The "trees in the perimeter planting area between the parking lot and arterial streets , and adjacent existing parking areas s**vrtd be a minimum of 30" box site . (3) ,The trees within the interior of the project site ,.•,; reer�d be a minimum of 240 box site. (4) Trees of 15 gallon size cr less .d**** ►d not be uti liaed in the landscape plan. (5) The irrigation plan shall include the use of low angle sprinkler hands along the perimeter of the site and the use of drip irrigation to interior planters to minimize water runcif .f . haft Report 115/48 (6) Phase I landscaping shall include completion of all proposed landscaping along Bolsa Avenue and Solsa �:hics Street . (7 ) The surface parking area on the eastern portion of the site where the proposed Phase It parking structure will be built shall be striped with landscape planters between oppaA ng lanes of parking stalls . The status of Phase Ir construction shall be reviewed on an annual basis by the Planning Director to determine if landscape materials shall be installed in the temporary parking area . Landscape shall be installed in the temporary parking area within five years of the date of approval of this conditional use permit . d . A comprehensive , permanent met of convenants , conditions and restrictions covering limitations on the mixed use entitlement including a list of permitted uses and any conditions of approval for the project , and all development , performance, and management standards shall be submitted for staff review . A recorded copy shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development prior to occupancy of any building. Approval for content shall be the responsibility of the Department of Comunity Development and approval as to form by the City Attorney. Any modifications to the approved convQuants, conditions and restrictions must be submitted to the City for approval . e . A parcel map creating leasable parcals on the site . Said map shall be recorded prior to final inspection and a copy submitted to the Department of Community Development . f . Geologist Report . An engineering geologist shall be engaged to submit a report indicating the ground surface acceleration from earth movement for the subject property. All structures within this development shall be constructed in compliance with the G-factors as indicated by the geologist ' s report . Calculptions for fittings and structural. members to withstand anticipated G-factors , shall be submitted to the City for review, g . A Silt Control Plan. A plan for silt control for all storm runoff from the proporty during construction and during initial operation of the facilities , submitted to the i Department of Public Works ror review. I 5 . Prior to commencing above grade construction the applicant shall prepare is Preconstruction Fire Plan, for review and approval of the Fire Department , which guarantees adequate access and fire protection for a building of this type of construction during all constructiot, phases . owl staff staff itepott -- 1/5lee -1�- ��6saa3 C1 6 . Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the Phase It a-story office building the applicant shop, construct the following public right--of-way improvements per Public Works standards : a . A 100 foot left turn storage lane for eastbound traffic on Bolsa Avenues coming from Bolsa Chica .Street. b . Install a traffic signal on Bolsa Avenue at the iccess point to the site 1 , 000 feet east of the Bolsa Chica signal . c. The applicant shall be responsible for providing the conduit, cable , and controller hardware necessary to coordinate the traffic: signals at the intersections of Springdale and Bolso Graham and Bolsa Bolsa and proposed pedestrian signal at McDonnell-Douglas entry on Bolsa Bolsa and new signal to be provided for this project Bolsa and Bolsa Chica This will require the installation of conduit from Springdale to Bolsa Chica. d . Construct a 150 foot westbound left turn pocket on Bolsa Avenue beginning approximately 500 feet east of the Solna Chica Street centerline e . Provide a second access point for the 1-roject along Bola& Avenue with the opening beginning and ending approximately 300 and 355 feet , respectively , east of Bolsa Chica Street centerline. This acces,, point shall be restricted to right turn only access . f . Construct a median break on nolsa Chica Street to serve the project entry. The median break shall be designed to allow for southbound left turns into the project , but shall rohibit westbound left turns out of the project . q. Construct * new bus stop/turnout on westbound Bola* Avenue adjacent to the project site and on northbound Bolsa Chica. Street . The precise design and location of the turnouts shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department and OCTD. The are& adjacent to the turnouts shall be able to accommodate a passenger waiting area with a bus shelter and bench . M paved, lighted, handicapped accessible Pedestrian accessway shall be provided between the stops and the project buildings . AWL Fow Staff 210"tt w 1/3/t• -13w ��i�0�d� �� 7 . Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for Phase 1, 8--story office tower the following requireawnts shall be fulfilled : a . A planned sign program for the entire development shall be submitted to and approved by the Director of Community Development . b. A Transportation System Management Plan (T.%M) for review and approval of the Public works Department and Co-orunity Development Department of the City of Huntington Beach. Approval of the TSM Plan by the City shall include consultation with the City of Westminster . The "TSM Plan shall address the following programs : ( 1 ) Hiring a TSM Coordinator ( 2 ) Financial incentives for zidesharing ( 3j Flexible or modified work hours ( 4) Preferential pprkinq for vehicles used for ridesharing ( 5) On-site child care facilities ( 6) Video and audio teleconferencing in the work place ( 7) Carpool matching service ( 8) Vanpoul program ( 9) Employee buses ( 10) OCTD matching service ( 11) Sale of monthly OCTD bus pasaes on-site ( 12) Pro•.,ision of bicycle facilities ( .13 ) Van shuttle service between the main office and outlying offices ( 14 ) Monitoring of air quality reports c . All Phase I landscape shall be installed including the perimeter setback area along Balsas and Balsa Chica in Phase II , E . Prior to the issuance of building permits for the Phase II , 12-story office building , or parking structure, the applicant shall submit for review and approval of the Public Wo-rks Department an interim traffic and parking plan to insure there is adequate parking on-site during Phase II construction. 9 . Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for Phase 11 , 12-story office building and parking astructure, the .following requirements shall be fulfilled : a . The applicant shall convert the westbound right turn to a through/right turn lane at the Springdale/Dols& intersection. b . The applicant shall submit an instrument , acceptable to the Fire Department and Community Development Departn*nt, gss�trtanteeing V%at. sn area will be set aside on the eastern boundary of the parking structure sa' s fire lane, staff sepovt - 1/3»1 (99500) i 10 . A 12-inch water main shall be constructed in Dols& Chic& Street from Bola& Avenue to the project' s northerly boundary. 11 . All on-sits; water mains shall be located within vehicular trav"lways and dedicated to the City . 12 , The applicant %;ball repair any damage to ©olsa Avenue or bolas Chica Street of damege during Phase I or Phase II construction . This will require the re-paving of the strait to its newly paved condition . 13 . The applicant shall work with the City of Huntington Beach, the City of Westminster and CalTrans to implement the traffic mitigation measures within the City of Westminster identified in Environmental Impact Report No . 87--4 , Section 3 . 4 . 3 . 1 . I, 14 . The applicant shall be responsible For all crianges or additions to street signs , pavement inarkings and stripings that are generated by changes due to the requirements of the development . 15 . No travel lane closures on Bolsa Chica Street or Bolsa Avenue will be permitted except by special permit issued by the Director of Public Works . 16 . Water conservation measures , such as the installation of low flush toilets , low volume shower heads , turnoff adapters, faucet flow control , hot watar recirculation and the use of drought-resistant landscape material shall be included in the 9 p project design . The City' s 12-inch sewer main in Holsa Avenue is presently overloaded . The applicant shall divert proposed and/or existing flows to the Graham Street sewer so that the P.1138 Avenue line will ultimately flow within acceptable levels . 18 . On-site sewers shall bo private and sized to accommodate future flows from the north . lg Prior to the issuance of building permits on the 66 acre McDonnell.-Douglas property located at the northwest corner of Bolsa Avenue and Springdale Street , clearance shall be obtained from the Orange Cousith Sanitation district stating that such development will not adversely impact the sewer system. Such clearance shall be in the form of a letter to the Director of Public Works and the Director of Community Development . 20 . Fugitive dust shall be controlled through the tine of water or other soul stabilizers during ,all construction activities . 21 . Construction activities shall be limited to the hours of : 00 AM through 8 : 00 PM. So Staff Report - 115,/$$ -17- 22. rf subsurface archaeological remains ire encountered during do-eelopment, construction shall be halted at once: , the City ' s Planning Department shall be notified and a reputable archaeologist shall bo contacted for an assessment . 21 . A L-inimum of 10 parking spaces within the parking structure shall be "green-curbed" adjacent to the entrance of the support retail building to provide for temporary perking for the businesses . 24 . Project shall provide a water system capable of providing a fire flow of 4 , 000 gallons por minute. 'The number and location of fire hydrants to be placed i�a pursuant to Huntington Peach Eire codes . 25 . Office towers shall comply with a_ 1 State ,caquiromenta of 'Title 19 and 24 of the California Administrative Code and Huntington Beach Fire Department Sper_i f icat ion 417 . 26 . Fire lanes shall be designated and pasted per Huntington Beach i Fire Department Specification 41.5 . 27 . Security gates when used shall comply with Huntington Beach Fire Department Specification 403 . All other security considerations due to the nature of the sensitive defense work shall be reviewed and approved by th Huntington Beach Fire Department in order to assure prompt access to all portions of the building in the event of an emergency incident . 28 . The support retail building shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system pursuant to Huntington Beach Fire Department regulations . 29 . The separation wall between the support retail building and the parking structure s1•.a11 be reviewed and approved by the Huntington Beach Fire Department pursuant to requirements of the Uniform Building Code . 30 . An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be provided in areas of the parking structure which do not qualify as 'open parking stucture . " 31. A standpipe system shall be required throughout the parking structure. 32 . The two restaurants shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system. 33 . Allowable Mixed uses within the project shall be those expressly allowed by Planning Commission Resolution 1387. staff Report Is. test ) 22 . If subsurface archaeological remains are encountered during development, construction shall be halted at once, the Cityls Planning Department shall be notified and a reputable archaeologist shalt be contacted for an asse:s �an;:. 23 . A minimt:m of 10 parking spaces within the parking structure shall be "green-curbed" adjacent: to the entrance of the support retail building to provide for temporary parking for the businesses . f 24 . Project shall provide a water system capable of providing a fire flow of 4 , 000 gallons per minute . The number and location r of fire hydrants to be placed arm pursuant to Huntington Peach fire codes . 25 . Office towers shall comply with all State requirements of Title 13 and 24 of the California Administrative Code and Huntington Beach Fire Departme,.t Specification 417 . 25 . Fire lanes shall be designated and posted per Huntington Beach Fire Department Specification 415 . 27 . Security gates when used shall comply with Huntington Beach Fire Department Specification 403 . All other security considerations due to the nature of the sensitive defense work shall be reviewed and approved by th Huntington Beach Fire Department in order to assure prompt access to all portions of the building in the event of an emergency incident . 28 . The support retail building shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system pursuant to Huntington Beach Fire Department regulations . 24 . The separation wall between the support retail building and the parking structure shall be reviewed and approved by the Huntington Beach Fire Department. pursuant to requirements of the Uniform Building Code , 30 . An automatic fire sprinkler system shalt be provided ir► areas of the parking structure which do not qualify as `open parking stucture . " i 31. A standpipe system shall be required throughout the parking j :structure. i 32 . The two restaurants shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system. 33 . Allowable mixed uses within the project shall be those expressly allowed by Planning Commission Resolution 1387. I vow � • staff Report I I 34 . A perAon or agency shall be designated as a parraanent liaiae:i to the City under the covenants, conditions and restrictions of the raised use project for the pr.upose of processing occupancy requests, resolving land use enforcement problems , and any other matters on which the City and property owner are involved. 35 . Materials and architectural elevations of the parking structure and support retail building adjacent to the parking structure shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board . 36 . Future build--out of the restaurant pads shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board . 37 . All building spoils , such as unusable lumber , pipe, and other ! surplus material shall be disposed of at an c, ff-site facility equipped to handle them. 38 . Natural gas shall be stubbed in at all locations of cooking facilities , water heaters and central heating units . 39 . High-pressure sodium vapor `amps shill be used for energy savings in the parking lot . 40 . Off-site improvements ( i . e . streets; sidewalks , gutters , etc . ) shall be constructed in accordance with Public Works Department Standards . All sidewalks on Bolsa Chic& Street and Aolsti Avenue shall be 6 feet . 41 . All high rise construction shall comply with local , state and NFPA standaLds . ' 42. The parking structure shall be designed to the requirements of Code Amendment No , 87-11 as presently drafted or subsequently amended by the City Council . 43 . The Planning Covunission reserves the right to revoke this conditional use permit if any violations of these conditions or the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs . .t22iA_L Q ,S�F�AP�Q lBCf.L..MU: 1 . The 'rentative Parcel Map received and dated by the Department of Community Development ort November 19 , 19870 shall be modified depicting the modifications described herein: a . The ccoss sections of Bolsa Avenue ant Bolas Chica Street shall be shown on the map. b. Additional right-of-way dedication shall be required for all deceleration/acceleration lanes and bus turnouts . c. Lots 5 , 6 and 7 shall be lettered lots . ' steef Report - 1/5/t8 -19� �giSAd� 2 . Access rights shall be granted between all parcels . 3 . the final parcel map shall he filed with and approved by the Department of Public Works and recorded with tha Orange County Recorder . 4 . A copy of the recorded parcel map shall be filed with the Department of Community Development . 5 . CC&R ' s shall be submitted to the City Attorney and Community Development for review and approval ac to form and content , and, when approved , shall be recorded in the Office of the County Rocorder and a copy filed with the Depart:io-ant of Community Development . The CC&R ' s shall address the limitations on the mized use development as set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No . 1387 and all parkinq areas on-site . 6 . Water supply shall be through the City of Huntington Beach water system at the time said parcels are develop�id . 7 . Sewage disposal shalt be through the City of Huntington Beach sewage system at the time said parcels are developed . I 8 . All utilities shall bt installed underground at the time said parcels are developed . 9 . Compliance with all a.)plicable City Ordinance, . , 10 . Vehiculi r acc ss rights shall h+: dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach except at locations approved by the Planning Commission or. City Council . 11 . The applicant _•hall exec-uLe ElZnA record a yard agreement acceptable to the Building Divi::ion identifying the areas in which construction 4111 not be ally.-.►ed . The Planning Coms;i ssion may deny Conditional Use Permit No . $7-44 , Conditional Exception (Variance) No . 87-95 and Tentative Parcel Map 37-424 with finding^ . Nts: 1 . Area map Z . Site plan, floor plans and elevations dated December 29 , 1987 3 . Draft Planning Commission Resolution No . 1387 setting forth allowable mixed uses within the development 4 . Getter from 14cDonnell-Dougla3 regarding access to the site from the west gate, received end dated December 28, 1987 Transportation Management Plan currently used by McDonnell-Douglas Astronamt3cs Co . , received and dated Decembas 28, 1987 6 . PArking hanageme t flan, received and dated December 28, 1967 Its tf ftport - 1/5r88 -eSRl ;biAg r} J. R1 ' i!1 . Rt a It l {: t t ly.. sytitY. Ir k R I 1'9Itlt ki i Ft ` M I-A t u :` e htl•l1 mI-,a-t'v15 to,id + CU17 is r--w- TfOM 6-1 -4 !A+ ~00'10i MACH "ANNW-o MIS" .... -r4P- rwuu rm•maps vw ms ms ww+w � _ ►Iir'�i10�AY?V�f N 11111i fell ; 1111i iii 1 1, 1111114 tool 1� �il I I / 111 d litVill Is $fit ! t 111 I 1ett+t R • �[ lil 1 1 �a till 'i illl 1� I • all 1 .0 04 I l ; • � ! ; ' � gt ��ti'! � �� ills f•I �� te��'•1' `!1 1 �. �� I r i1� ► � � I ,�� hill .I !x ------------ � � �• w �` , . ._ _._ � era+_ J �• �'� i 4 i p -x._ ' ' l jai 1 1 e- ` ; 1 - i ii f -"G. _:yam •1 1 1 f Site Plan ` bb It N !o If ii ii .. .. ,;! r 1. •,/•(�� •.`!,'' 1� � � 1 f J , tt , � 1 -AL— I ILL4 .I Vfllllll . ► i ,. i � f • r r ,r s � 1� itu ww — , I t Tt ! Rta Ttt3ii t ft{ 1t1 f' t. 4� OR :�=-2, 1 R00F PLAN ti j! r f• Fl RST F L 0 0 R SECOND F L 0 0 k _ ..,.. Loaf 11. AK 14 tiT csK � ... ..... ._.._�._.. ,k II IMF ,•1 -mot`- • � -- •. • __ •: 1 i s THIRD THRU T V F L F T H F1. 00R RQOF P L A X - 1ti� iif� ro I p FIRST FLQQR SECOND FLQOR it ' - EA1T � �[iT RIIYATI(fHf lkd i r—. CAI fun 0 M NINFM nfloww "MTN URVATIOW �• dais tit - � __....-ter....- � r ` r ; • ' � ^� MV �� r w!.cncwat OUMPIPG FLooe FLA?s f - t ADC, HUNTI NGTON Bf-',ACl-1 OFF1 GE PARS: � .._...�.. _ '•°fir - _ � - -- -- -_ s .. _. - •.• rr• .r�.r �__�_r __-. 4P i� i aRTN i 4UUTfi I: i. F A ON FAST 1 W E 3 T ELETATCD i OM ' F l� - T ` r-� Tf ax4 1 oit--- — �r •.�• �r - MAY ��.�. r fmwaw NII 1•�� i1i. f.3a. _ 1 � r rr 1 t i � l N k111 t S01; Tit F: t_ F1 A T 1 Oi 1: A T A IAF: S7 1: LCt' tTI 04 g—=� sl■i _ '� r • s �'` i —sirvb.mac- _ __ .. __. .. - - .. - - - �_.z _ '.n—..aiiir t•.r. ::.-v[-.iSL`75Y y. RESOLUTIdli NO. 13.7 F, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CQMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HUNTING'-"ON BEACH ADOPTING A 1,I6T OF USES WHICH WILL BE ALLOWED AS PART OF THE MCbONMMLL- DDUCLAS OFFICE COMPLr.X. A M1XED-USE INDUSTRIAL DVfEL0MMKT, LOCATED AT THE YORTHEAST CORX`ZR OF BOLF.A AVENUE AND DOLSA CHICA STREET t WHEREAS, the McDonnell-Douglas office Complex is situated at the northeast corner of Bolus Avenue and Bolua Chics Street within the K1-A Restricted Manufacturing District; and, WHEREAS, the M1-A District contains a provision (Section 9510 . 14 ) permitting Mixed Uses which include certain types of retail , commercial , office and servir;e uses which , because of the nature of their operation or space needs , vhould more appropriately Located within a light industrial development ; and , WHEREAS , Section 9510 . 14 ( a ) of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code requires that a resolution be adopted by the Planning Commission prior to the approval of a conditional use permit in order to establish a listing of uses which will be allowed in mixed use industrial development ; and WHEREAS, the intent of this Resolution is to set forth the specific type of uses permitted within the McDonnell Douglas Office Complex so as to provide guidance to the Department of Community Development ire authorizing occupancy of the buildings within such mixed use developments ; and WHEREAS , the developer has agreed to keep the City apprised at all times of the ratio of commercial , general office and corporate of f ice operations , so that the project does not exceed that which is authorised by the approval of Conditional Use permit 87-44 ; and , any violation of the terms of this Resolution or and Condition of approval of Conditional Use Permit 57-44 shall automatically subject the Conditional Uss Permit to a public hearing for passible revocation; and, �IT�r`eaC4",,K W WMEAS, Phase I construction of the project shall include the following development : , 8 Story Office 'Cower 235, 831 gross square feet 1 Restaurant 7,000 gross square feet s 242, 831 gross square feet 1 , 096 surface parhing spaces WHEREAS, Phase II construction of the project shall include the following development : 12 Story Office Tower 345 , 551 gross square feet 1 Restaurant 7 , 000 gross square feet 1 Support Retail Building 9. EOQ gross square feet 362, 151 gross square feet 257 Surface parking spaces 2, 030 Parking spaces within structure WHEREAS, ultimate buildout of the McDonnell-Douglas Office Comple s will include a total of the following development : S Story Office Tower 235 * 831 gross square feet 12 Story Office Tower 345 , 551 gross square feet 2 Restaurants 14 , 000 gross square feet 1 Support Retail Building 9 , 600 gross square feet 604 , 982 V iss squarer feet 494 Surface parking s pace-s 2 , 030 Parking spaces within structure KIEREAS, the total floor area of all commercial , general office and service uses shall not exceed thirty-five percent (35%) of the original gross floor area of all buildings, and the remaining sixty--five percent ( 65%) of the original gross floor area of all buildings shall be restricted to corporate office use . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the following mixed uses shall bo permitted in the buildings constructed during Phase I construction, +end any additions, modifications, or revisions to this list shall require a revised resolution prior to establishment of any such addition, modification, or revision: a • 43 ;a,,, F t' i Restaurant, (7 , 000 gross square feet) A single, restaurant use shall be permitted to nerve the tenants of the office building and surrounding industrial uses . The restaurant shall be limited to hours of Operation 6 : 00 a.m. to 17 :00 p.m. Live entertainment, drive thru windows or expanded hours of operation shall be subject to now entitlement . General DJUcA�is& (71 , 750 gross square feet) General Office Uses such as Attorney, Accountant , Engineer, Architecture and Planning , Insurance, Collection Agency, Manufacturer ' s Representative, Community/Social Services , Diagnostic/eiocheinical laboratories , and Real L3tatre Sales . Medical and dental Offices , including chiroprectoz , optometrist , physician and surgeon and urgency medical centers and clinics shall be prohibited. I CQE20=ate Off.ice..-U-1-a ( 164 , 080 groan square feet or 65 I percent of gross floor area) Administrative, management , regional or headquarters offices for any permitted industrial use which is not primarily intended tO serve; the general public and trade schools , limited to industrial occupation training (excluding comnerci.al business schools and colleges) . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RFSOLV£D, that the following mixed uses shell. be permitted in buildings constructed during Phase 11 construction, and any additions , modifications * or revisions to this list shall require a revised resolution prior to establishment of any such addition , modification, or revision: Few AN. — r t ' 1 Y Y �YS1#,t (7 ,004 gross square feet} A single restaurant use shall be permitted to serve the tenants of the office building and surtpunding industrial us^$ . The restaurant shall be limited to hours of OPOrstion 6: 00 A .M. to 12 : 00 p.m. Live entertainwent, drive thru windows or expanded hours of operation shall be subject to new entitlement . SU2201t Retail -Building (9, 600 gross square feet) Services such as McDonnell-Douglas Credit Union, travel agency, newspaper and magetine sales , stationary and office supplies; printing or copying service, mail service, telephone answering service, laundry, dry cleaning, :shoe li repair, office equipment repair and sales, and food service II establishments with less than 12 seats . rag atra 0ffiCl.VI General Office Uses such as Attorney, Accountant, Engineer, Architecture and Planning, Insurance, Collection Agency, Manufacturer ' s Representative, Comeavnity/Social Services, Diagnostic/Biochemical laboratories , and Real Estate Sales. Medical and dental Offices , including chiropractor, optometrist , physician and surgeon and emergency medical centers and clinics shall be prohibited. Cornoratez O, ice UAe Administrative, management , regional or headquarters offices For any permitted industrial use which is not primarily intended to serve the general public and trade schools , limited to industrial occupation training (excluding commercial business schools and colleges) . After completion of Phase 11 construction, the permitted grass square lootages of the mixed uses shall be increased to the following figures : � Restaurfnt 14,000 gross square, feet Support Retail Building 9, b00 gross squares [craft General Official Use 188* 143 gross square feat Corporate Office Use 393t236 gross square #errs Assolu"_ioA (jtk 04 PJ1MD AND ADOPT iD by the Planning Commission of the City of Hunttngton &*acho Califorals, on the .,,.. day of 1987, br the fc12owinq roll call vote: AYES: Ii0ts : ASSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Mike Adana , Secretary Planning Comission Chairuan ;I i s; r 'I Resolution �. . AkOwMN1 Detq/ss Asf�ar►�u tits C�psfir 'I 23 December 1987 McDonnell Douglas Realty Co. g Y 18881 Von Karmen Ave. , Suite 1200 Irvine, CA 91715 Attn: Mr. Merle f autsr,h Vice President . Development Subject: lRAFFIG FLOW AND ACCESS TO MCDONNELL DOUGLAS ASTRONAUTICS CO. AND THE PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING PROTECT AT THE CORNER OF QOLSA AND BOLSA CHICA. i Gentlemen: i It has been brought to our attention that the City of Huntington Bea 0i has expressed concern over the acce,ts from Bolsa Chica Street to McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Co. , Skyiao Road. and the proposed entrance to the nev office bud Corner project at tie orner o! Balsa Chica and Balsa. The separatt access po4nts from Balsa Chica support operational , security and safety requirements . Skylab Road is a private controlled road with fullti+ee security used for specific operations of the Astronautics Company. The west Gate (Skylab Road) Is the only egress/ingress for personnel and materials into the western portion of the Astronautics Conpany. As such, the west Gate would be seriously impacted if it were to become a primary access for the office building project . i It is not logical for office building personnel . restaurant users , and parking structure users to enter through 'the Skylab Road and use a circuitous route to gain access to the parking structure or other perking locations an the new development. This circuitous route would create safety prohlW-, on the office building cowlex site as well as safety and security problems at the Skylab Road and the West Gate. A single access from Aolsa Chica. creates significant safety problems due to the mixing of pedestrian and vehicular movement. Public ingress/egress and high usage of Skylab Road creates a security problem with the progr-ims for which McDonnell Douglas is responsible. federal Contracts/Criteria allow MQAC to use our patrolled parking lots as a controlled security area. Our security provisions require than t *Vxisc3rq ,- controlled parking areas nest of Building 21 btlt controlled. tlpeh'1fq the parking areas to the public would create security problems with rMfing -. contracts and may unacceptably compromise security operations. �tgrjdatlani cf j security impacts the ability of McDonnell Douglas to perfor* itrp*Ck for, 01h rederal Government. . f iK+/#rAr A> Nw�wi d CA#J60 W M;P W n"rN 0 W446 ATI".«► L South Coast AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT" aV c7 f 0150 FLAIR DRNE. EL MONTE. CA $1731 (111816724M . . . . . . . . . . . . 5ITS. . . . . . . . . . CgKpmy I0: 016660 Source Receptor Area 017 L. D. ANDERSON MCDONNELL DOUGLAS CORP MCDONNELL DOUGLAS CORP 5301 SOLSA AV 5301 IO SA AVE ATTN : D. R.J©RDAN A3-700 MS11-1 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 926470000 ATTENTION: Episode Plan Coordinator Hear Coordinator; Your Emergency Episode Transportation Management Plan has been reviewed and is approved. Emergency episode messages transmitted by the South Coast Air Quality Management district will include the affected source receptor area number identified above. Your official Approved plan is enclosed . It mush be maintained on file, along with this approval letter, and be available upon request by a representative of the District. While you are required to update your Plan annually, any significant changes should be made known immediately to the Transportation Management. Plan Office. John Dunlap, Coordinator Transportation Manage*►nt Planning Division (816) 573-6433 Enclosure r � � All • .all .. •• AL ` Attess to the new off ice bui ldl4 project from Skylab Road would also nW%ce existing available parking and create a parking problem at the most sire of our facility. This is because any access road to Skylab mould elinioate existing parking .stalls . The Most Cast University location at the north. at . the new office buildings on the south limit parking lot expansions. Ybereforc reductions in parking mould be unacctatable. Two separate accesses from Balsa Chic& Street proyide improvod safetr for all people involved. The existing signal lights can be synchronized and signs installed to provide optimum safety for all users of balsa Chita Street. It is strongly recowwnded that two accesses bt planned and provided f rgeir Balsa Chico: 1 . 'The existing access at Skylab Road to the M4AC• 2. The planned proposed access to they office building project. f please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions or desire additional inforaation. it. M. Olson Staff Senior Manager facilities NMO: cf i 9 t t AT