Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutConditional Use Permit 84-18 - Saber Limited - 3200 sq ft Dr sue`----•-era.aoc-.�r.wr..d.�....wwea+.�a�m nee.� ��/' 1N T118 Superior Court or"rxe I' STATE OF C .LIFOHNIA '1 ' In and cur the County of Orange ' CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH# CITY CLERK a C11 QZ PtLB.LICxTI()N Use Permit 84-18 Rate of California C(,unty of 0Mge RITA J. RICHTER That i nue and At all times herein mentioned was it citizen of t'nt United$tates,over the a&e of twenty-one years,and that I ' am not a warty to, nor interested in the above entitled matter; that I am the principb!clerk of the printer of the fir; 7 HUNTINGTON BEACH AND. REVIEW a newspaper of general Litcuiation.published in the city of HUNTI14GTON BEACH County of Orange and which newspaper I% published for the , discraluatNm of 1real news and intelligence of a general charac- ter. and whi;h newspaper at all times herein tnr•„+tt-ned had rrtd still hat•a bows fide subecriptitm list of paying subscribers. ate which newspaper has been established, printer! And pub- lit.hed at mulae Intervals in the raid County of ortnnge far a 1°K "rind exceeding one year, that the notice. of which the ti , annexed is N printed copy, has been published In the regular seed en'..re iasu+ of Paid newspaper.and not in any au; plement thereof.an the following dates,to wit: Jule Zi• 1964 � 1 toetily(oe dalue) Modes penalt•i of perjury that tha fovgo,,- ind it tM nod rxrrrt+cl. GARDEN GROVE Jl;attt at. ............. .. •.,....... 84 tJUN• teeter ., .. of...: .. ..19....,... ti. j ... its J. Richter. . . , r CL / Fo,ln.No,aJP 9 Use Permit BA -18 June 5 , 1984 ' Pane 3 During the land use plan clerk , Staff noted that 34 parking spaeeR were required for the restaurant Building %nd 20 for the office/commercial building - a t-3tal of 54 . The two parcels delineate 21 spaces provided; however, crE it may be given for 10 spaces within the rewtaUfontts drive-through lane. The twc. sites are deficient ant) require reciprocity with the adjacent center, and the tot,-..I proiect is deficient try 3 Spaces , based on the developer ' s calculations for tenant parl.:ng. A tenant: listing of the adjacent center has recently been submitted to staff. Based on the City' s calculations , the exieting center requires 148 parking spaces as oppposed to 141 as indicated by the developer ' s �4 tabulation. Combining the 148 space requirement with the 54 space requirement for the two parcels and allowing stacking credit for 10 spaces, the integrated center has a total requirement of 192 parking spaces. The site plan submitted for Use Permit No. 84-111 reveals lag packing spaces provided. Therefore, the proposed buildings ai:e unable to satisfy the code parking requirements. of major concern was the circulation pattern of the restaurant site, the proximity of the exit lane into the ingress-egress commercial center drive, and the additional traffic impact to Beach Boulevard. .� The Board of Zoning Aciust.ments reiterated its 1903 attempt to persuade the developer to redesign the adjacent commercial center entrance and have a single entrance at the center of the site . Had the developer relocated t►:e driveway , st4f.. ' s concerns regarding, potential traffic cc.:n,stioil and hazards wolsld have been elim r,eted. Following the Board of Zoning Adjustments derision to reconsider denial action, the appellant hired a traffi -: consultant to monitor traffic and 'to Prepare alternative building layouts; and a traffic; impact report ( attached) . Following a review of the t:l:aftic stvdy, it was noted that �iaffic circulation alternatives had beeii proposed rc;r1 the original building siting and variations in layout . The appellaiiit did not accept any of the proposed alternatives, and the report Supports the, original layout previously denied by the Board. On Apri'1 ,25, 1984 the Board of Zoning Adjustments held a public hearing t•o., reconsidtt its previous action . 1t was the consensus of the hoard that: no changes had been submitted to warrant the reconsideration; oleiPfore, the Board of coning Adjustments reaffirmed the findings for de, ;hial.. 1 5010 :.#fir,OPM NDATi4N : a • �.1WI..IY� A��-1�1�1111 ■II�Y.YWJW s a#f; c ecommends 0e .'PlanniLng Comm4sel-on uphold the board of 2ani,r A'djusta nt;s! `decrial of Use Oermlt No. 94-18 based on the following �. ; - , fi►tdi.�t�i . - Use Permit No. 84-18 June 5 , 1984 ' Page 4 FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1. The o::-site parking requirement provided for the pi upozed structures is deficient. 2. Reciprocal parking utilized with the adjacent center results in a parkin; deficiency of 10 spaces , 3, The drive-through concept has the pote"it of creating a hazardous on-site circulation pattern. 4 The drive-through concept has the potential of creating a _ hazardous ingress and egress traffic impact. , J•44P :SP :df Attachments : 1. Area Map ::. ite and Floor Plans and E'eva,-ions 3. Traffic Study 4 . AZA Minutes - March 28 and April 25 , 1984 0 7 31d . I m I ,= C:-`f 7f t: .j��.` _fit •�r:y • �_ .♦ t- � 1_<<.,-.- _` l 47t - 1 t iZ 3 t Yrr r_a x r - F . mi s M1 -�, - - c z , R R a� Rl UP84-10 N Mi�M�G+OK K*tm Pl4NNi#WG DoWsir ali MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS Room B-6 - Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA WE}DNESDAYr APRIL 25, 1984 - 1 : 30 P .M. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Godfrey, Smith, Evarn3, Vincent STAFF MEMBER PRESENT: Pierce MINUTES: ON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY VINCENT, THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 28 , 1984 , WERE APPROVED AS TRANS- '' CRIPED► BY THE FOLLCWING VOTE : AYE:: Godfrey, :smith, Evans , Vncent NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: RECONSIDERATION OF DENIAL ACTION USE PERMIT N0 . 84�-18 (Con' t. from 4/18/ts .t) �1 . licant: Mr. Ruda V;i n Mil � { : `Reconsideration of request to permit a 3, 200 sq . ft . drive-thru - Bldg: "D" , 2, 400 sq. :ft . retail and 2 , 000 sq . ft . office second story - :'�" Bldg . "C" ' Site location is at the northwest corner of Beach and Slater;revenue. tL ` `ollowing introduction, Chairman Smith reop •:n.d the public hearing to ` Wonsl!er denial 'aotion taken by the Board on March 28 , 1984 . The :oiiginal layout .wa►s felt t'{ areate a hazardous onsite circulation pattern 'and the drfve-thru porti•rn of Lhe restuarant , was located -too Close to the entrance/exit on Slater Avenue. Thu proprietor, :Van 'Mil# was present. Mr . Carl Wayne, of Wendy ' s '.(tenant) 4t d Grover of Mohler, Grover and Associates -were not present to in favor. of their proposal within the con nurc al center. 'r ctioiA- . Godfrey stated .i;hat upon review of the traffic 3bpact . 5 ,�a�' r�part, :pr+�purecx :by Mohler Grover and Assoc iates for Wendy's rt was �)�;, {Y ►+ir1t1+ .1; Lhat :;:h�ic original layout. was ,a►gain' proposed bhly, With r o ipculation`► -The applicant was prwiaualy n t� ed . "djs�ri�ti t}.' t et t�iycr�ing: the build�;ng . around : it Would e' liminate =the ;� o� t�►`�'''`t Lciaia�N,' ;,lietry� is ; tii :arel� �t , �, a err�sd not to do � .:#ter 0.a hat t Y u lams. wi�y's• 1a)eoilt �4� Y. , 1144 f i 4y• � r .., Wrr .�}i It , i.} { } ,^;l r � f}t �•1.. �- +�4fy4�'Jt• ,r'}J J ;'titor I ! 1, cr J r, - . t { ,r tJ / `; t r � ': �• � �t,�y r 1.'� 1rF,3 ` , l f, l c °. i ,r / S tr r�}rip1'i1;r``krjsY'�r�'li. +� r ,j/1 = r v} r, � �• t l rr% Ar`{"4I' il}viz Y A r '�T ° v}L r • r ' �, 4 t' 1v r fk ji"Jf'i, 'ggrJ,�{04i.y( ?'� + i )r 2 .} •� r Ji _ .A.t; ° r .i t. - ° f.' � �ry r, r+.d] +} jiLy;i ._ lb..r:.�t'C�1-y,p:I..r Y` , .IiJ ..'� _.+rt t � '. S 1 Lt .r �t r 'M� rri"• Minu,:es: H. B. Board of Zoning Adjustments Apr i� 2 , 198 4 Page ':moo " is inconsistent wish reatton predicating reconsideration . Mr. Van Mil stated that as grading and paving have transpired, to turn the building would not be wise economically. Concerns with the report (Alternatives A thru D) were dia::ussed with Mr, Van Mil covering problems with stacking , backing up, over- building of site, driveway locations, etc . I It was the consensus of all of the Board Members that the statistical II analysis received reaffirmed problems staff felt to be evident on original plan denied by the Board . ON MOTION BY VIANS AND SECOND BY GODFREY , DENIAL WAS PLEAFFInMED WITIJ FINDINGS AND VOTE FOLLOWING: FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1 : The on-site parking requirement provided for the proposed structure is deficient . Twen- -y-one spaces and Len spaces allowed in the drive-thru lane require reciprocal parking with adjacent co,Tunercial center . The combined total requirement based on use is three more than provided. 2. the drive-thru concept has the pctential of creating a haza-dous on-site circulation pattern. 3. The drive-thru concept has the potential of creating a hazardous ingress and egress traffic impact. .AYES: Godfrey, Evans, Smith, Vincent � NOES None ABSTAIN: None CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION N0 . 84-21 AaliCar•t: Dordoni 6 Associates To permit a L eduction in rear yard setback from lv' ' 0" L•o 7 0000 Subject property is located at 20752 Colima Street. ' Ch;.f•�tian Smith introduced the applicant ' s request and iitated that. ar .Section 15101 of. the California Environmental Qua?ity Act of 19,70, ' ` this .proposal is categorically exempt, Class. 5. �t Minis •�stAt ! 'that ,an analysis of the subjeet property ,verfferi :that "'�•r A�a J 'tt ab ,`e� �`i it j was not placed parallel 'wi•th the property liras: > tiy, th�►t additfon an s�+oold encroach all setbeick l .3 n, the ;irrequsc eh�pe af. the lit lacatad -at `thy t�►nient o va, rUl Erse apen space: r quirement 4ixl ba .met. fim�� , fi�f`1�W�. 'E�.�.i'�if"raa � r. ._f / ..�- -. .. t ; _.ti . . ,... r + • —.,._i + , t .l.,:;�sli.'tt^j'!,"• H . B . Manning mmisr ion dune 5, 1984 , page :i • USE PERMIT NO. 84-18 Appeal! A pl ican t : Rudi Van Mil To permit a 3, 200 square foot drive-through restaurant and a 4 , 400 square foot office/commercial building on property located on the northwest corner of Beach Boulevard and Slater Avenue. Michae; Adams presented Glides of the proposed project locaticrt and reviewed the reauons for the prior denial by the Board of Zoning Ad- justments . A Me:�ised site plan has been submitted , but the concerns 04. access and adequacy of p ..rking remain . tie said tha_ taking access off Slater Avenue could lessen the problem of all uses in the center using the same access off Beac., Boulevard, where cars exiting the center aisles would tend to block traffic attempting to enter off the arterial . Mr. Adtims pointed out that the total center is 10 spaces short of the- requ ' l.-ed parking , based on the known tenant mix at the , present time. however, Commissioner Livengood pointed out that the 182 parking calculation for the site includes roomfor 10 stacking spr.s:es for the restaurant under consideration and only 5 spaces are available with the present configuration, therefore, he felt that the ;project sharta.. is actually 15 spaces instead of 10. _ The public hearing was opened . Car' Wayne, .representing the applicant , spoke in favor of the: appli- cation .request . fie si�id his business does not generate traffic, but only makes use of the: existing traffic that comes through an area and that the 10 stacking spaces referred to be Commissioner Livengool were 5 :paces for: cars waiting to get service and 5 cars after an order is riven and the customer is waiting for his food. With th�:ir volume of business , Air . Wayne indicated that this would be adequate. In 'f response to questioning from the Commission , he conceded that the drive- ' through window could possibly be repositioned tr provide one or two MOM stacking spaces. '.There were no other persons to speak for or against the proposal, and the. public hearing was closed. .,'CoMmis sion. Aiscussion included the alternatives proposed by the app 1 cant' s traffic consultant, the overall development (both'_a:=is ting and planned) for the total shopping center site, and the ownership of the '.Nitd. • A Mr. Paul Serrano addressed the Commission to inform thsm that , the center .iw - owned by a single F+artnership composed of five indt- Y` vi�c��aa3s. The property is three separate parcels for financial pur-- `,.possep ' brit' a single set of CC&R s has been developed for the ' total 'Glen Godfrey also informed the Commission that a new appli� +, here .been` received in the Department of Development Services : f the site= ; ;thie, new plan calls for a retail .building on pad. C .and , ti , i .': 'restaurant with no •drive-thrbugh facility on Pad U. t ? '}a+jet.t�l��lyt 1r 1'.f+ ' rl, 1 •.r. . a. CITY OF HUNTMNGTUN BEACH 2000 NIA1N STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK Jury K, 1984 Saber Limited 5455 Garden Grove 81 va SuitP323 Westminster, CA 92684 The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting 'field Monday; July 2. 1984 sustained the decision of the Planning Camission av:d denied Use Permit t+or 84-18. This is a final decision. You ere hereby notified that pursuant to {provisions of Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Proceoure of the •Stat3. of California you have ninety days from July 1984 to apply to the courts for Judicial ravi ew. A1-icia ,M. Wentworth City Clerk AVW:CB:bt CC':' Gail ` Hutton, City A orney J% Pal i n, Development Services Director at RIjO. Van Mil Pro. 19400 Beach Olvd.,.:Suite 20 Huntington Bizach, CA 92646 al r +tj1 �,ti1,,irl•V . ,.'. ,`o• .. a .. •, , �. - -- - — '1 _ .. - r REQUES FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date June 18 , 1984 Submi t,+d to Honorable Mayor end City Council Submhtedby: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator lJ� ' Prefwrsdby. Jar►_s W. Palin, Director, Devoslapment SF _vic•es Subject: USE PERMI'i No. 84-18 , APPEAL Statement of Issue, Rec:omnwdr.tioi., Analysis, Funding Source, Aiternative !lotions. Att: 1,m�rtts: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Tcanswi tted for your consideration is Use Permit No. 84-;18, a request to appeal. the Planning Commission' s action to uphold the Board o� Zoning Adjustments ' deni,l of a 3200 square foot drive-thru restaurant and a 4400 square foot office/commercial building located at the northwest corner of Beach Boulevard and Slater Avenue . . i RECOMM &NDATION: The Planning Commission and staff recommend that the City Council uphold the decision of the Planning Commission and deny Use Permit No. 84-18 with findings. ANALY SI S: &elicant: Rudi Van Mil 19400 Beach R?, Ste. 20 Huntington Beach 92646 A„pp ll,&nL: Saber Limited 5455 Garden Grove Blvd . ;Mite 323 Westma ins tor, CA 92684 R uast : To `permit a 3200 sq. 'ft. dc:ive- thru Bldg . D and -b 4406 sq. ft. office/comes cial building r, Loctition: Northwest ciiher, of Beach Blvd. and` Slater Avenue . ng on Action. on Jana 5 i 1984: 'Ilk, Jana Comsmaissi rr On' *0AWin. by: HigginR aitid second by Winchall the.,plannimna 0 istiotn upheld- the dertisl by the Board of 2oniny 1►djustaremnts :of. Use Permit no. 84-18 with the following findings , by the following vote : FINDINGS FOR DENIAL. 1. The on-site parking requirement provided for the proposed structures is deficient. 2. Reciprocal parking utilized with the adjacent center results in a parking deficiency of 15 spaces. 3 . The drive-through concept has the potential of creating a hazardous on-site cir:=::lation pattern. 4 . The drive-through concept has the potential of creating a hazardous ingress and egrsse, traffic impact. AYES: Higgins, Winchell, Livengood, Erskine, Schumacher :4aES: Mir jahanyir A NTs Porter I' ABSTAIN : None DISCUSSION s The applicant submitted a request to construct two buildings on tao parcels adjacent to a commercial center under. construction. Proposed at the northwest corner of Beach and Slater is a drive-through restaurant and on the rear parcel is an office/commercial building . Proof of legal creation of theses two parcels must be subm.1tted or the parcels consolidated with the adjacent commercial site prior to issuance of building permits. 1 nuring the land use plan check, staff noted that 34 parking sp; �es were required for the restaurant building and 20 for the, affice/commercial building - a total of 54,, The two parcels delineate 21 spaces provided; however, credit may be given for 10 spaces within the restaurant' s drive-through lane„ The two sites are deficient and .require reciprocity with the adjacent center, and the total project is deficient by 3 spaces, based on the eavelope.r' s calculations for tenant parking . A.. tenant listing of the: adjacent center has recently been. ` eabisi'tted to staff. ' Based an the City' s calculations , the 'existing--center requires .148 .parking spaces as cppposed to 141 as indicated :hy the developer ' s tabulation. Combining the, 148 space . .'Zoo-wire ent with the S4 space requirement for the two p;rcetls End allv!11ing stacking credit for 10 spaces, , the, integrated. canter - has a tt�taNl req�'irseaent 'of ..192 parking spaces. ' .ie sitee plan;, ` auti ittea for ..013p% Permit No. 84-18 revealu '�.BZ parkin space g aOfe id ereforop �thr proposed buildings ire: unable to: astiisfy thi code:'-Park 'n9 'recjuirersentse RCA Of major concern was the circulation pattern of the restaurant site , the proximity of the exit lane into the ingress-egress coieusercial center drive • and the additional traffic impact to Beach Boulevard . The Board of Zoning Adjustments reiterated its 1983 attempt to persuade the developer to redesign the adjacent conmercial center entrance and have a single entrance at the center of the site. Had the developer relocated the driveway , staff ' s concerns regarding potential traffic conjert•ion and haaardr would have been eliminated. Following the Board of Zoning Adjustments dpcis ion to reconsider denial action, the appellbnt hired a traffic consultant to monitor traffic and to prepare alternative building layouts and a traffic impact report . Following a review of the traffic study, it was noted that hraffic circulation alternatives had been proposed for the original building siting and variations in layout. The appellant did not acnept any Lf the gropusedr alternatives , and the report supports the original layout previously denied by the Boaff.. On April 25 , 1984 the Board of Eoninq Adjustments held a public hearing to reconsider i,,:s previous action. It was tiie consensus of the Board teat no changes had been submitted to warrant the reconsideration; therefore, the Board of Zoning Adjustments reaffirmed the f ind ingi For denial. Luring the Public: hearing at the Planning Commission June 5 , 1984 meeting , discussion ensued regarding the justification for parking space cred'. _- , parking deficiency created by the commercial center: expansion, and the Board of Zoning Adjustments concern with he Planning traffic circulation. . It was the consensus of t la g Commission to uphold the Board of Zoning Adjust*:,ents' denial of Use Permit No. 84-18. EM M.&i`.RTAi, STAZO S: In 1978 a commercial center was approved but never constructed at this location. Negative Declaration No. 78-23 considered this type of dev elopaent for this location, and no addition&I environmental assesesent is required. A MMATI'VE AC'ThM: Tho. City Council may consider approving Use Permit No. 84-18# howtva r, the project should ,ie required to satisfy the on- site parking requirement. Such approval Would necessitate a site plan tovision to eliminate building square footage or revision in parking lot layout. t3 '�E1Cr IWO TI ON : ` Staff, report dated Juno 5, 1984 ' Draft Planning Comt:tiesion minutes June S , 1984 amp:��lf �IIl?d -3 6-18-84 - RCA - r%j 410 a- June 13, 1�84 The City Clerks nrfice 2000 Mnin Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Heach, CA 92A41 'RE: Northwest corner of Beach & Slater Huntington Beach, CA. Dear Sirs: Saber Limited hereby appeals the denial of the Planning Co"'imisaion of Use Permit #84--i8 . Should you need any further information, please feel free to contact ' me. Sincerely _ - . Daniel N. Busby ®r�! 0 by Kathy Vveamart bN3/ja 1 •J 'fir; 4 ��s. +j�tl,+ i t rF e•., -.tat s• + � - (� r1LJj'ar r• ' t t� ' MnA�At 54 14rf� GWV9 M'r0XVAMD,v4tr"b 30, Ro111 xsM,Gi "iss 7 ;,1""44Y4 r{� or•i• .G , ti t +a."•.�1,�..� �1i4' ^$,. >�"wt.i.w. 'r._ ) '.s. ' ' r .. , _ .._ :. r h 1 . .. . "r� . . _ ... r — ' _ r � IN 111M11 mill IN In e, et t �c June 13 , 1984 �.• .Y • w •i LtOr City of Huntington Beach City Clerk' s Office 47.000 Main Street, 2nd Floor 'Huntington Beach, CA 92647 RE: Northwest corner of Beach and Slater Huntington Beach , CA Dear Sirs: Faber Limit-�d hereby appeals the denial of the reconsideration of Use Permit #84-18 . We are being denied a use perwit due to us being five parking spaces short and not havi.;g enough stacking room for the dr ive--thru. We are appealing this decision based on thr- fo3lowing: 1) There are sufficient parking spaces. Please see enclosed photographs . 2) The five-car stacking lane for the drive-thru is 7 sufficient . City officials from Huntington Beach recommended that we hire a traffic consultant. The traffic consultant po~formed a study and analyzed our Wr.ndy ' s operation. The conclusion was that a five-car stacking lane, based on Wendy ' s volume, was sufficient . If any additional information is needed, please feel free to conta.-t me. Sincerely, Daniel N. Husby li408 / Ski E. (X:KAN ■KLMY�11M SUr E U0, t�il�MG BEACH, 4A !Ma / �-4�� • IkUnItington beach developma services department ffA f F EPORT -.---.-- TO: Planning Commission FROM: Department of Development Services DATE June 5 , 1984 USE PERMIT NO . 84-18 APPEAL APPLICANT: Rudi Van Mil DATE ACCEPTED : 19400 Beach Blvd. Ste . 20 Huntington Beach 92646 March 20 , 1984 APPELLANT: Saber Limited MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE : 5455 Garden Grove 31vd. Suite 323 July 23, 1984 • Westminster , CA 92684 ZONE: C4 , Highway Com- mercial District REQUEST: To permit a 3200 sq. ft . drive-thru Bldg. D and GENERAL PLAN : General. a 4400 sq. f t . office/ commerc a� commercial Bldg. c: EXISTING USE : LOCATION: Northwest corner of Beach Blvd . and Slater Avenue Vacant. ACREAGE : 0 . 52 1..0 SUGGESTED ACTION : .—Uphold the Board of zoning Adjustments' denial of Use Permit No. 84-18j. based on the findings outlined in Section 7 .0 . 2.0 GENERAL INFORMATION : .,se Permit No. 84-18 is *a request to allow construction of a 3200 squaire ;foot,dirive-through restaurant and a 4400 square foot office/commercial building as an expansion of an adjacent 'Commercial center under .const:ructton. Following a denial by the Board of Zonknq lA� ustAeants`- on ,March 28', 1984 p the applicant requested a ' 4 Coco ti t'i ecation. The Board of Zoning Adjustments Leaf firmed its_ denial ..April ZS , 1g64, Saber Limited# ' dba Wendy ' :, has app�siled 7 - - ;,, ttiii aniAl. 0010) '�) it .f i .. 1r.•✓ _ ,'t +fit f, .1 ' ' ! Mrw •�M��r ! t - • t Use Permit 84-18 dune 5 , 1984 JI ^agc 2 3.0 ISURROUNDING LKLID USE , ZONING��ND GENERhL PI,PN DSSYGNATION: Subject Pr.o2 e zjX: General Plan : General Commercial Zone : C4 , Highway Commercial Land Use : Vacant North of Suct Property: General Plan : General Commercial Zone :. C4 , highway Commercial Land Use : Commercial Center East of Subject Property: General plan : General Commercial Zone : C4 , Highway Commercial Land Use : Commercial Sbuth of Subject Property : General Plan: General Ccmmercial Zone C4 , Highway Commercial Land Use : Service Station West of Subject Property: I General Plan: Medium Ifigh Density Residential Zone: R3 , Med. High Density Residential Lana Use : Apartments 4. 0 ENVI RON MENIAL STATUS: : In 1978 .a commercial center wqs Approved but never constructed at this location:, Negative Declaration No . 78•-23 considered this type of develppment for this location, and no additional environmental : aasesi�ptent is required . •S_'0. ISSUES AND ANALYSIS : ' h,e, &Opii•dint submitted a request to construct two buildings on : two ' pa c is: :bdjbc r:t to A commercial center under constructiort, ,,, ,Proposed � At' -CA a .;no'rthwgst.' corner of Beach and Slat-ir is a drive- khrough rest�ruticar�t; and cn the : rear parcel is an off ice/comme rcial building. �r'res . ! gaChe� kc o ub 00oqalctiean parcels a�l9 lrol3 kh head'adjacent Ccia3 � priortodw pit ualwe ot4u11dvng `permits. : 1V " FIN 1 +u gig, V.,B. Pl�a'nning lesion ,r ,y ' . After further review it was the consensus cf the Commission that the ax e ' ap fired to be designed in two separate parts , with the layout ' not conducive to operation as a single entity and that future traffic , circulation, and parking problems were probable if approval were z; .granted withouc. the size and use proposed for the second building on the- remaining portion of the center being known . ON MOTION BY HIGGINS AND SECOND BY WINCHELL THE COh11-1ISSION DETERMINED TO- UPHOLD THE ACTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS AND DENY USE PERMIT NO. 84-18 FOR THE hOLLJWING REASONS , BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: ` 'Is'YI�DINGS FOR DENIAL: The onsite parking requirement provided for the proposed struc- tures is deficient. rt Reciprocal parking utilized with the adjacent center results in a parking deficiency of 15 spaces overall , 1,1 -, 3 .' The drive--through concept has the potential. of creating a hazard- , ous onsite circulation pattern . it 4 .,. The drive-through concept has the potential of creating a hazard. out; ingress and egrens traffic impact . AYr.5 : ` Higgins , Winchell, Livengood, Erskine , SchumacherN0,LS s Mir jahangir ^. .t� ABSENT.. Porter 1STAIN z None 1 4 , 1 � Ij .I v � 1• i � r >r ! , j: •� - 1 , A��(� tart t r r y r ' r , al 1 , ♦ �+hF�.Y�)✓S�i,7f/1���,j 11�} (1♦i�`:7.r.) 1� r / 'r/. , ; ' J 1 r �I! , t.r t+' (1 r' 1S t 1.j.Al!�." A !�+(�2x�'Fj�1 JI r,'ti i".} 1�.t�. r •f,r;tf r r �s •.1 /'. � ('ll r lr� `r, .�s ) 1 r I �•� it;/(r�'ir� •jl� 1-�N'r;i�r��ll,'t f� S����� _ /t f � � ( ) , • ' •1j ' t � f r 1 t .1¢j • 4 i��M� r y�Tt �t� l� �1 h t '.:.� �,f ! �..z ,� y r � 1 !t, � ! +t �',,,, �} `•r `YIf�41 r i� '>`�,�. w' < < �tyy 4� :3r��KZ1 ;�)/ J� r 1 r-f.l •.J f, 1 1 1 '1`I 1 r/�, , ��,t .., y! `}.�+, 1 °( i1),<ii �i•h f•' --.f / �.:/Ji� -.'1� lj3a'{ �t �� 1 ,r-.`.f t J i 'l� ,`;S '' f '.�j�7, ,C;p I r. �1 ,I, 1 r l4 ;' 1 r "�i • . 4l•..�1��''t.'Q.''{..r.i.i. �t}L�:..,.41.r.,'.ri•r..:?-.., .,. :;� ... .:.�.{{I �. r �!_ r.l ....! ....... ,.... ..�I:r.�,.SE�.IL,u.L StsL1LC��'•1' •.,�+ Publish 6/21/84 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL us NOTICE IS HEREBY G!VEN that a public hearing will pe held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach , in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of J;jo P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible on mandax the _2nd day of July lg� for the purpose of considering an appeal to Planning Commission's decision to sustain the Board of 2o►Ong Adjustment' s denial of Use Permit No. 84-18, a request to permit a 39200 sq. ft. drive-thru restaurant and a 4,400 sq. ft. office/comarc;al building. Subject property is located on the northwest corner of Beach Boulevard and Slater Avenue and zoned C4, Highway Commercial District* A legal description is on file in the Department of Devel opirant Services. All trnterest*d psrsons are invited to attend said hearing and express their ;I x�t t►p►la ions . far` or against said Lase Permit 084.18 Frp VWr-, infonution may ,be obtained from the office of the City Clerk, .2O+DC Mein r ,str t. AiNtOoltoa 5"ch4 ea Ili fo +nia. 92646 - . (714) 36-5227 ti <a , Sly: Al I cle kj i0.`j1i 7 p '� ,m cityJ. �it+ :.fiaYk t f r"�ts '• 1 �is •1 _ . . r,,tl ,' '� LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a pub].ic hearing will be held by the City Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach , �f� .:alifornia, for the purpose of considering ail : eat to c n of Use Permit No . 84-18 , s request to permit a 30200 sq. tt . drive—thru restaurant and a #Ao sq . ft . office1ao,*, *Pv,:v1 building. Subject property is located on the northweut c9rner of Beach Boulevard and Slater Avenue and aanpd C4 , Highway Commercial 44 District . A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services . iA/'• Said hearing will. be held at the hour of 7 :00 P .M. , on _• June 5 , 1984 , in the Council Chambers Building of the Civic Center, 2000 Main Stzeet, Huntington Beach , California. All interested parsons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed Uric ForwLt No ., 84-18 appeal . Further information may be obtained from the City Planning aeipartment. Telephone No . (714) 536-5271 DATED this 24th day of Maur, 1984 CITY PIANNING CC}MMISSION , 8y t jl . 1. Fil, .,; 1',Cl +►n'Crt��t pe. I7471 Beach Blvd. 17301 Beach Blvd. F` abut 6 taa�, beach, CA 92646 tington Beach, CA 92649 i-luntington Beach, CA 92647 J!. R 16x+23341 k - 12 A. P. f 165-234-08 A. P. # 165-3Z1-03 11ic1►ard h+liytorera Time Square Ltd. Seaside Ranchos : 17441 �Kselson Labs, f B 19400 Beach Boulevard P. O. Box 444 r i'�tntiagtaa Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 9Z646 i 'Tustin, CA 9t680 r A. P. 0 165-233- 13 ` A. P. 165- 234-09 thru -12 , A. P. f 165-321 -04 David K. • irs:rler Sidney Wasserman Ronald N. Steiner 13x4 S. Eac1ld St. 17331 Beach Blvd. 5250 El Cedral A'naheirn, CA 92802 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 ' Long Beach, CA 90315 A. P, 0 165-Z33- 14 A. P. # 165-234- 13 ` A. P. 0 167-31 1 -03 Ceorge B. Mut,e ! Anna Capocclama 1�4a�as1 Development Co. 1804 Agnes Road ` 6371 Athena Dr. $550 Cahuenga Blyd. West Maahattan Beach, CA 90266 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 ' Universal City-, CA 90068 A. 1n. l65-x33- t5 I A. P. f 165-714 - 14 k - 15 ! A. P. 167-311 -04 9'rank A. Dbsek Raj P. Shah �M1►'Illlam 3-I. Churchill, Jr. Z701 Pebble Drive 884 N. Snow Goose St. 233 Broadway • Carona del Mir. CA 92625 Orange, CA 92669 11 NowYork, New York 10007 thr u - 1 A. P. R 165-214 -• 16 �. A. P. 4 167-317-01 :-, A. lo. � 1b5 Z'13- 16 t 9 , Tarrrea R. Dent Ellbabeth DispOatro ; Robert C. Autrey 7.042 1319asail• Dr. 791 .1 Slater Ave. f 703 Lariat Circle Hnntinston Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 9264? I Long Beach, CA 90815 I h!t-233.?p A. n, 01 (�r,-y�t.l_ 17 A. P. 9 167-312-0? 'baron M. Dickinson , Harold G. Kudish I Doan-Russell Co. [544 N. Harding 5t. 1107 E. Chapir,an, 0108 ' 3960 Wilshire Blvd, #509 .Orange, CA 92667 Orange, LA 92667 Los Angeles, CA 90010 r .A. P. ,A 165-233-21 A. P. # 165-222 13 A. P. 167-3.12-03 "N"a Chiang Harold G. KudIsh Wilbur W. Lorbeer F 17322 Sam& Barbara St. 1107 E. Chapman, � i08 � Z3 - 57th Place VA116yo CA 92708 Orange, CA 92667 Long Beach, CA 90EI03 P. f 165-7.34-^1 A. P. 165-275-n5 A. P. IF-1-.112-06 a Sidney i Mobil Oil Co titian �'sith i'!lsl�m � Y Wasserman ! r 17331 Beach Blvd. ' ., 611 S. glower St. ,r i:7�� :Kielra�► Lens � !, . `lfiitttag "Beoua d6' CIA 92647 � Huntington Bi %cli, CA 92647 ' � Los Angeles,• CA 90017 '3� +, '� 1�9•` 3�-03 A. P. 165-Z25-06 k -07 A. P. 167-312-05 t3edialt Hal E. MacLeod , ! A st,Ztv�r Y. Ha Zs ,, 1t 'Teat 3710 W. Mad St' . aal� Blvd. CA • 90605 t4 ►ti>a�tian i►a1w C ,� ii q.d rYr r t j t •. 4,, ; ,; < ll — A. . . 3t�7 �1 O6 r p `Jt`; iriirlr <Y1a1s H hil�rr�►p Cat3ae A. i*w�la► ' t '�► . 9t6S3 H nttat" r L : CA .�J ' SrllSL��1�, .r. .L• .. lr... . ' ._.. '� �+ 1, ' die VVIUA I TK-23 Beach, Blvd lftntl"Stda A44sb, CA 92 # 167-472-02 ember Limited 5455 Orden Grove Blvd. Suite 323 Westminster, CA 92683 Vista Beach Slater 19400 Beach Blvd . Ste 20 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 I : 1 � t f •. /j,J LuJ�N3�� f, w 1 .11 t.l •1 �j,�a wi a�tV ��� ,llt �• 11 IJI 1 ',! t, .. 1 Publ 1 Ski EL21184 NOT111 OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO PLANNING COW,I SS?DW DENIAL OF LISE PERIOI 7 NO. 84-18 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by Lhe City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Ciric Center, Huntington Bead:, at the hour of 7.30 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as passible an Morday_--- -- the 2nd day of July 1984 , for the purpose of considering an appeal to Planning C.D missim's decision to sustain the Board of Zonino Adzustment 's denial of Use Permit No. S4.18, a request to permit a 3,200 sq. ft. drive-thru restaurant an,., a 4,400 sq. ft. office/comercial building. Subject propertyis located on the northwest corner 0f Beach Boulevard and Slater Avenue and zoned C4 , Highway Ctxmercial District. A legal description is on file in the Depa►".:rient of DeveloMent Services . All int""t+ed PerW.S are fnvited to strend said hearing and axpre-ss . tb#fr , AIP40mW f0t or s"iinst sa14 Use Permit ''34•113- APpe41 Wwmw-, WOV0040i tllmd from the 'Off icat .of the Ci tr Ct*ric :., 40' , :�� , , � 41tirori a1iia11.''gnu jJ't+136- r , s a C I rTY 'OF ' r i ri{ye T7i �� t-�' fx � a ' '�7y ' ; : x" x t .x1 10 left 1 } •, r' x...:j. I i r•< <' l `''.. t ' E _ ` � tt . .. -. .. :' . '..._ r r ..i•,f F M it HUNTINGTON BEACH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MAY 1 ; %4 P.0, Box 190 Etuntington Beach, CA 92648 TRAFFIC IMPACT REPORT IN FOR PROPOSED WENDY' S AT NORTHWEST CORNER OF BEACH BOULEVARD AT SLATER AVENUE FOR SABEk LIMITED BY MOHLE, GROVER S ASSOCIATES 901 EAST IMPERIAL HIGHWAY, SUITE A IA HABRA, CALIFORNIA 90631 (714) 738 .3471 .r it yy r' ,APRIL 1M 1 , �`1',II,t'Yt�r�titihf �� ' Z .e ': .'a t Itt `„� b' •J � - ., ` i � �.,� MONLE, GROWN ASSOCIATES MUNICIPAL AND TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER 901 East Impg" Highway, Suite A La M�rbra, CA 90631 • (714) - i April 20 , 1984 Mr. Daniel. rt. Lusby Saber Limited 5435 Garden Grove Boulevard I. Suite 323 Westminster, CA 92683 Dear Mr. Busby: Attached is our report on the traffic impact of your proposed Wendy's store at the northwest corner of Beach Boulevard at Slater Avenue in the Vista Centre. 1`he study concludes that the proposed plan is fully worka:+ln considering the proposed mix of business types at the center. The primary concern was for adequate storage or queue length for the proposed "drive through" window pick up. There is adequate on—site storage to accommodate peak quer.e lengths without limiting the safety or operational efficiency of .' either entering or exiting traffic to the center from either Beach Boulevard or Slater Avenue. j We are available to answer any questions you may have an the report. 1 J We sincerely appreciate the opportunity of working for you and the splendid cooperation of the City staff in providing background information on the project. Sincerely, 40BLE, CRCVER ASSOCIATES i r ' fin';/��k,1 , f�r jlri'..� 1 t e ! :`:! � . - . .. r .7 • V1z i, TABLE. OF CONTE21TS PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 Conclusions 1 EXITING CONDITIONS 3 n.NAL`.'SIS OF PROPOSED R£STAUR.UIT SITE PLAN 5 Queuing Length 5 Hourly Business Variations at Wendy' s 5 Analysis of Vista Paint Store Traffic 7 Analysis of Queue Situations Longer than Five Cars 8 Analysis of Exiting Vehicles 9 On-Street Circulation Considerations 9 ALTER►4ATIVE 'WE:'u i'S SITE I Ayou rS 10 ANki,lSIS OF EXISTIi'G HUNTINGTON BEACH WENDY'S 11 I APPENDICES Appendix A -- Machine Trnffis Count Results Appendix B - Queue Length Observations Appendix C -- Alternative Wendy ' s Site Layouts Appendix D - Photos of Izoposed Wendy' s Store Appendix E -- Photos of Existing Wendy' s Store LIST OF FIGURES �* Figure I - Site Plan 4 r K Ticure 2 - O:igival proposal b ,1 c 1,. u IN RODUM61ON The purpose of this report is to analyze the traffic feasibility and impact of a proposed 3 ,200 square foot Wendy' s restaurant with both sit down and drive up facilities at the northwest corner of Beach Boulevard and Slater Avenue in Huntington Beach. The facility would be an integral part of the Vista Centre. A 21,100 square root Vista Paint store -dill be the so called "anchor" of this shopping center. This study was commissioned by Saber Limited, the propose3 developer of the Wendy's facility. :he need for the detailed analysis is based on the denial of Use Permit No. 84-18 by the Board of Zoning Adjustments dated *larch 29, 1984. Conclusions The following is a surs:aary of the roost relevant conclusions resulting from this study to evaluate the traffic impact of a proposed Wendy's store at the northwest corner of Beath Boulevard and Slater Avenue: o Mest of the non-Wendy's traffic entering Vista Centze will use either the northerly Beach Boulevard entrance or the entrance on Slater Avenue because f traffic orientation, directness and convenience for center users. o Because a significant amount of Wendy's business is from motorists already on the str_et system for other than "to eat" reasons, the new traffic generated by a Wendy's type operation will result in leas "Dew" vehicles on either Beach Boulevard or Slater Avenue than a land use that i generates a higher proportion of "dedicated' or exclusive trips for only that purpose. o The mix of business types at the center with an "anchor" of the Vista Paint store will. produce relatively low vehicle generst. im during the midday peek for the �} proposed Wendy' s state. S J The on—site aisles of the center's parking area can safely accommodate the short time prrlods when the queue* " to the Wendy's dr ivo up/pick up window exicaad the five i'` (5) vehicle -:opacity of the storage lane totally vitbiv �4 r the specific Wendy' s proposed site. V, J : r i, t11i Aviv* a� � f � eatfapce 10 to&t ir' tbt=i.Jtt outo j ion sf t iata=ior str*s aswi aitvst 'Loci cOutar s !t o• ttii esh 4 want, L � the t fists°e aaf°tt+ed vahitls *ovthe ctotiot s +° i�ada►ti pos xisai a,aimp Qas= oe S?�g at�aw sstria d ac 81sts Aver b s=hoar T evAm s a¢ v - es Basch b°°ti°o aisle+• Yaiak *tote t tba + ti r, :;';, ° hcb•osepcn�sdi° sst s�nt6c i us l ei stada a=svks+i ia�sti41 Xii1bea �� lPt°40 o LOW d a soQ¢ • t:b � ts b°bt pLs therew 'Celstivell o* Msa "to eater t�! aldds9a 't* da�and `t at a Qeaa_ 1 1 i� .� t lY�,l: e� J i �• y ., : ',rf lei '�'�' y,.p.14 1 bI t 4 1 yy,..,. ,1 r e i n e t 1 w 1 r s y 1 , TING COMMONS Figure 1 , titled "Site Plan," shown the general layout o: the Vista Centre. As of April 16, 1984, Buildings "A" and "I" have been completed as well as the parking area for these two buildings. The area identified as "D" is the general area proposed for the Wendy's Facility. The center is presently s.rved with two drive approaches on Beach Boulevard as shown on the site sketch. Beach Boulevard has a raised divider and, therefore, all turns into these two drive approaches are either right turn "in" or right turn "out." Beach Boulevard has three (3) through lanes in each direction plus parking lanes. Slater Avenue has four (4) moving lanes plus parking and a painted median that vill provide for left turns into the center for eastbound vehicles. Area "C" on the sketch shows the area of a future building. Traffic volumes on both Beach Boulevard (soutbbound) and Slater Avenue (westbound) werh counted for a seven (7) day period. The detailed results of these counts are included in Appendix A. The counts showed that the weekday 24 hour volume southbound on Beach Boulevard is about 28 ,000 vehicles per day and the vent- 4 bound volune on Slater Avenue for a typical weekday 24 hour period is 9,000 vehicles per day. r The ictersection of Beach Boulevard at Slater Avenue is controlled with a multi-phase traffic signal. Appendix D contains photos of the proposed xeudy's site as well 1. as the ov ers 11 Vista Centre. The photos show rbe two, two drive approaches frhm Beach Boulevard to the center. Also shown is' the Slater Avenue frontage where there will he one, two-pay ' drive approach to the center. The photos also indicate that at the rasint t ire• the tenants at the center, in addition to the es, laiot store will be: a market, hair and nail salon, Samurai ;.ssVtaarast$` cleavers, carpet store, art gallery and pasta restart- i MAT 4 {fir y ' ' +4i LR���Y;�.......'�•�ti h,_.,. , ,.. ; _'. . ... . r �_. r-. _ ... � is,._.e::e._,. •: L, III , 4 a F do 4b •• � .,� 1' s j � ;;tip or JIM ro 0.0 1 / 1p Pow 16 - - ME •L*ATSt N -AVSS1 i '_ � • �• • S1S7•M i M . tt - S ANALYSIS, OF PROPOSED RESTAURANT SITE PLAN Figure 2, titled "Original Proposal, " shows the building orientatica, circulation and parking for the Wendy's facility as submitted in proposed Use Permit 84-18. gsno its Ltnrah This figure indicates that a total of five (5) cars can be "stacked up" from the food service ­windov to the edge of the parking lot access lane. lu order to document queue lrngtlis representative of the Wendy's operation, three existing Wendy's locations were observed during the midday peak period. Appendix B shows the results of the three teats. Based on a review of the queue length observations, it is concluded that the period of 11:50 to 12:35 is representative of the peak activity period. During this 45 minute pes.k period a total number of 30 observations were made. The average queue length for these 30 observations was 4.8 vehicles. The highest number observed was 8 vehicles (one observation) . The store at Golden West Street and Edinger Avenue: shoved a ■aziium queue length of b cars. r riY Du:-jnesr Variation at Wendy's lee order to provide documentation of the peak business period in ` a typical Wendy's stare, the Saber Limited company pruvided cash regist*r readings of transactions recorded for noon to 1:00 p.m. an typical weekdays for the existing Wendy's store located in the tq , shopping tenter at Golden West Street and Edinger Avenue. Batted on the fig,- ors provided and knowledge of other operatioaa. It, Le determined that approzinately 45 percent of the Wendy's a basiness is nobducted in the noon to 1:00 P.M. time period ' $Lace the .pytopo%*d Wendy's will be ala:ont identical to the, ibetfagton Beach store, it is expected that the proposed project. } will gave a afmilar hourly Peak bits iuess period of seen to 1:00. ! ;yak .i d �,tt �'• 1,wti f r � r 5� EE II f f � (WEIQDY%,s BUILDING D F7L. . . � 2 f ! t � Sl PAMW6 t7) ALL5 C� . ...,�.................. S � t � Ili CrIamd ftrw 1 s +s n� �•: r, tia LY r 7. FIGURE 2 •��rr��f ILL'-.aMA 1�: � lu�. � ':. .•• �, ,. '. - ti i}y WY�. it '�r/11� 'f' _ •. , fj[ Th"e peak ilendy's business will occur during the midday "sag" in (later Avenue traf f is volumes as shown in the graphs of Slater ' - Avenue traffic volumes in Appendix A. The graphs show that on Katez Avenue the westbound volume from 12:00 noon to 1:60 p.m. Y it about 520 vehicles per hour, which is the $th highest hour. On Beach Boulevard the southbound volume from 12:00 noon to 1:00 p.m. is about 1 ,800 vehicles per hour , which is the 7th highest hour. lvsis 2 -Via Ls Pain Store Traffic Recognizing that the Vista Paint store will be the principal retail operation at the center, a review of the traffic generated by two existing Vista Painh stores was studied during 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.u. on Tuesday, April 17 , 1984, the time period of peak activity at the proposed Wondy's. The two Vista Paint stores were located at: o 2341 North Tustin Street, Orange o 1450 South Harbor Boulevard, La Habra The results of the traffic generated by each of these Vista Paint stores for the midday Wendy' s peak period are as follows : Store Location Time Oranize La Habra _ Pe:rjodd In Out In Out 11 :00 - 11 :30 11 11 7 7 I1s30 - Noon 11 10 5 5 !noon - 12:30 4 8 6 6 12:30 - 1 :00 S 6 6 6 The highest one hour "in" volume at the Orange store was 22 vehicles. At the La Habra store the volume was about one--half at 12 vehicles is an hour period. It ' The results of these observations couf irss that the Vista Point stov*s are relatively low troff is generators during the midday � f rind when the Wendy' s traffic vole;a would be at a peak rata. TUO lista Paint stores open at 7 :00 a.m. and close at 6:00 p.m. 1►e*a stores are heavily oriented 'to wholesale, contractor sales mbich occur' early in the morning when Wendy's business is eelativesly lubt. Iti, r i ai � r rkrS\v rNv ADA1TP!1 91 QA1U Situa 110 ILL .MA ZiU RM > Yvon air overall, operational viewpoint, one of the most important aspects of the traffic circulation design of this center is to a'ainits the probability that traffic on either Beach Boulevard 11 or Slater Avenue will. be impeded by vehicles either entering or leaving the center. In other words, it is necessary to reduce to the extent possible the "side f_-iction" on both Beach Boulevard c and Slater Avenue caused by this activity center. h The ingress situation is consid+red most critical for beach Boulevard and Slater Avenue traffic. The ingress points should be available to receive vehicles turning into the center without undue slowing or stopping While on Beach Boulevard or Slater Avenue. Xteping the Aisles near the streets clear of stopped or queued inbound vehicles is the beat way to keep the ingresn operation safe: and efficient. If, for instance, a s ' xr.b car were in the Wendy's drive up window queue and that particular car bad entered the center at the southerly Beach Boulevard drive approach, with the proposed plan there would be about 125 feet available to the entering vehicles to safety stop in the aisle. Another vehicle; i.e. , the seventh in the example peak queue, could also be safely accommodated in the on-site aisle without endangering vehicles entering the aisle from Beach Boulevard. Because of the queuing caused by the traffic signal at Beach Eoulevard at Slater Avenue, there will be numerous times when vehicles southbound on Beach Boulevard wishing to go to the proposed Weady's will use the northerly drive approach because they fuel it would be more convenient to get to the store by entesiag the: center upstream of the congesti,)n caused by the signal.. In these cases the north—south parking lot aisles would be used for acceed to Wendy's , thereby keeping room in the southerly aisle open due to the; distribution of entering traffic. It is Concluded that with the proposed site plan during peak periods for the Wendy's drive up window, there will be queuing of vabiclos is the on-site ainle. This situation is not ideal but Le considered a possible minor inconvenience to other users of the ceotteer because they will have to drive around the stopped vehicles or wait until the vehicles in the Wendy's queue MY* ipe The fact that a majoz tenant at the center is a Vista Paint store sk�ee��rs that traffic activity during the saidday period will be u •; r l *1 for vehicles exiting from the Wendy's drive up window there are three (3) possible exit routes. 4 The f irst is to site a right turn auto beach Boulevard. The second is to travel directly north its the parking aisle to exit from the nortberly drive approach. The third exit route is to ,r asks a left turn and to exit onto Slater Avenue. With these three alternative exit routes available, any queuing ai,,,tgr a vehicle has been served is considered a very small prob- ability. Qo-Stgeet Circulation ConeidErat ions As far as on-street circulation is concerned, the Wendy's will not have any significant impact, primarily because this type of fast food service typically does not generate an excessive amoccnt of additional traffic. gather, it provides a service for existing traffic. Actually, some other type of land use could generate additional traffic and thus create more on-street traffic and cause off-street circulation problems if that land use hat, a peak usage similar to the rest of the site. The Wendy's peak usage is not at the same time ac the rest of Vista - Center. For informational purposes only , on-street traffic counts were wade (end are attached) for Sunday through !"hursday, April 8-12, 1984. ,s 1 i i . ti 1 ,• f 1 A ' 04h0 .i 4 f `VY + r w f v4 • r I _ I Yt R! {1 AA,=YUTYYL !MNRT'S SITE LAYOUTS Your alternative layouts ns shown in Figures A through D in Appendix C for comparison to the original proposal were developed. Tnese alternatives are summarized its follows: A) Move building as far east as possible (approximately 10 feet) - No significant change; still only room for 5 car storage but gain one parking stall. 1) Place "pick up" on north side of building - Gain 2 parking stalls but still only 5 car storage and pick up entrance interferes vith Beach Boulevard driveway, Which is unaccept- able for traffic circulation. C) Rotate building 90 degrees With pick up on the west aide - Same results as B above. D) Rotate building 90 degrees and move as far Past as possible Slight improvement in that the drive-through entrance is away from Beach Boulevard; however, there are 4 less parking stalls and still only 5 car storage. ' f r} Rry�Sys' s 10 • - .. , .:. ., .. . : a mwJ _. r .,_� Yip. 6Vh,• ✓ ,e t r t t4+ t u y, tit A field review was made of the existing Wendy's store located in ti the shopping center at the southeast quadrant of Golden West t Street and Edinger Avenue. The photto$ in Appendix E show the stdrtr's relation to the on—site parking aisles of the center* In particularo the photos show the drive tip window pick up late ire relation to the interior aisles of the shopping center. Observations of the number of queued vebicles for the drive up window during the midday peak pario.d showed that at this store the m ximus number of vehicles in the queue was b vehicles. gated on the field revi.ev and queue leng'h of observationat it is concluded that a drive up windov storage lane design that starts in the interior of a shopping center (as in this facility) provides a situation that minimizes the possibility of disrupting traffic operations at the street entrances to the center. Unanticipated peak queue lengths will back up into on—site 4iales and not into the public street entrances. 7 i; r , w� r 9' F: ITS LAla tl(ti 1 • r t T to ' - r •t ti l:s�t:�Yri + c r r 667� + r a trr '�kit� aL 3b t...'J�MO N�`}.!., i ..°Y ,!.,•. .,t rt i, ' / r .. .. n ,''.t.._ t. r 1_�'�,e=Ltrd.�a.A�`it:, ^\ `. j= APPENDIX A , x � farm Coaol I l This appendix containr the �reaultn of macbine recardios traffic counts taken an Beach boulevn,rd (southbourd) north of Slater Arenas and aa. Slatec Avenue (westbound) wont of Seach Boulevard 4 } t Arr+,, 1f + • I •• t t. tt 1 , !i •F+rSIa{+^1` �,'st t` ii ;/ t�• ` + :I. f - I .'� f �.+1 TO 14 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 24 HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUME BEACH BLVD — NORTH OF SLATER AVE - MONDAY 4/9/84 END TIME S/B 5/19 ' TOTAL www wwwwr rwwww rr.r. ..r wwr wwwr 1 s 00 AM 258 0 256 2s 00 AM 145 0 145 3:00 AM 94 0 94 4: OCR AM 73 0 73 5tOO AM 96 0 96 6: 00 AM 247 0 247 7: 00 AM 894 0 894 8: 00 AM 1536 0 1536 r 9: 00 AM 1535 0 1535 10: 00 AM 1345 0 1345 11:0U AM 1540 8TH U i540 12s00 AM 1608 0 16U8 1 :00 PM 1507 0 1507 2: 0O PM 18a0 4TH 0 1830 3:00 PM 1"65 0 1765 4: 00 PM 1986 G 1986 5: 00 PM 2006 U 2006 6: 00 PM 2137 0 2137 7s 00 PM i741 0 1741 8: 00 PM 1377 1377 9:00 PM 1 t)24 !l 1024 10: 00 PM 895 0 895 1 l s v0 PM 677 Cl 677 12t OD PM 442 0 442 xesssaaas:aa xssasa asssxsa �aa� easa ,' TOTAL 26758 026758 a, AM PEAKHCUR ------------ � :END TIME S/B END TIME S/B END TIME TOTAL , ` —rww..r r...w ---ram r.�—.......-..►r w —rw w.w—�.r—rw rrr—.� , 7: 45 454 00 0 .7 s 45 ..454 8: 00 503 O: 15 0 8: Ov 503 `tY 8: 15 4Go 03 30 0 8: 1M 404 8: 30 ' b8 0: 45 G 6s 30 366 '.� - asa��xzaes s�asrc� xasussass�m nsraass st�aasaaswt �ae�:�• .; TOTAL ' 729 TOTAL 0 TOTAL 1729 Fp PM PEAKHOUR END TIME 91111B END TIME 9/8 END TIME 'TOTAL wrrrr ----- wrw— ryr.r.�w , �•, 5 s. 15 568 01 00 0 15 568 !: 8y '30 484 01 15 0 5t: .30 494 •" ! , i, r' .� Ss •'4*i 354 1)t 30' 0 .5s 45 530 p 00 535 0 e 45 r� 6: 00 �3B -r ,� i , , I��A/ak td ID ill y1 r �es 7f 9111� ss rat w ale at et wlt sr a at r�Yt rt ye s:tt r_x�at!�o a to�q TO�'Al. 2137: TOTAL 0 TOTAL — • CITY, OF -HUNT I NGTON 6EA CFi it 24, HOUR TRAFF i C' D I 87R I BUT I ON BEACH BLVD .. NORTH pF-AL.ATER AVE MONDAY 4/9/84 - VEHICLES PER HOUR END TIME 0 220 440 660 880 1100 1320 1540 1760 1900 2: 1 :00 AM *o x z 2:00 AM *o n 3 s 00 AM *o x 4 s 00 .AM *ax * 5:00 AM *o x 600 AM *a x 700 AM *o x 8100 'AM *0 x 9.00 AM 10: 00 AM l l s 60 AM *Q K 12t 00 AM *o 1 44 PM 2: ( 0 PM xo K * i r3 s 00 PM 4r 00 PM 5: 00, PH *c K i 10109 .PM 40 it 12 t 0, W" ICI X .d'iu' S,1 ,,. it1 a " ' .�*�!�*�'�•��'�'�'�*��'�*'��'*'�`�"s�l�'k'�*��•'�'IFS'�'1��f�•y!'�'*'�!'�'��•�'���'�'�'�'�'11k '�•�'**'�'i CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 24 HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUME BEACH BLVD NORTH OF SLATER AVE . TUESDAY 4/10/84 1ND TIME S/B S/P TOTAL L : OO 'AM 265 0 265 2: 00 AM 128 0 128 3100 AM 110 0 110 4­00 AM 83 0 83 5: 00 AM 83 0 83 6: 00 AM 2.32 0 232 7: 00 AM 864 0 (364 8:00 AM 1739 STH 0 1739 9100 AM 1786 0 1786 10: 60 AM 1448 0 14413 11 : 00 AM 1592 0 1592 12: OQ AM 1660 0 1660 1 :00 PM 1782 0 1782 2:00 PM 1726 0 1726 3:00 PM 185U 0 1850 4: 1)0 PM 19:35 1) 1935 T 5: rat:► PM 1948 0 1948 6:00 PM 2072 0 2072 7: 00 PM 1969 4TH 0 1869 8: 0r► PM 1509 O 1-509 9: 00 FM 1187 4 1187 10100 PM 1039 0 i r�39 .� 11 :01) Per 765 0 765 12t00 PM 464 0 464 TOTAL 28136 C► 28136 AM PSAKHOUR ------------ END TIME S/8 END TIME S/B END TIME Tt]TAL 7: 43 439 01 00 0 7. 45 459 8: 00 553 0: 15 0 . 8: 00 553 8: 15 323 0: 30 B: L 3 523 ' al 30 4 32 01 45 0 8: 30 432 c _ _ otlietsaeascasrs aaleai a�ssassss=s aaz�e saw-�ss�a satsaa�r -TOTAL 1967 TOTAL 0 TOTAL 1967 PM PEAKHOUR ------------ END TIME S/8 END TIME S/8 END TIME TOTAL '5i 15 Os 00 4 51 13 329 5: �_30 4H1 ut i5 0 St 30 982 < < 541 0 541 r . h b! ' 00 45 A 6t tar) 32i .i s 'wWom-lcWARAW in in Awn 30 ===343% a ' ` 'TOTAL. '20777 ' 10TAL 0 TOTAL 207a, ,�� it •;�� ''•1. - '', '.. , r`�, CITY OF HUNT I NGTON BEACH 24 HOUR.-TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION. BEACH BLVD. — NORTH OF SLATER AVE r` TUESDAY 4/io/84 r VEHICLES PER HOUR 'j END TIME 0 210 420 630 840 1050 1260 1470 1680 16901 21 ' 1s40 .AM *a x 2 s 00 AM *o x 3: 00 AM *o x * 4: 40 Art *o s; 5: 00 AM *a x 6: 01) AM *o >; 7: OU AM 8: 00 AM *o x * 9 s Of)- AM 00 x 10:00 AM 11 : 04 AM *o x 12:00 AM +�o x a 1800 PM 3i OO- PM *o K yI 3160 oM *a x ' 4:00 PM *o x * 51 oo4 PM *o hloo . PM *o ,x 7:00 PM +o x tr t 0i 60 PM *o n l f,t oo 'PM *0WWI x 0-N 1&4, 1�#*�� - h W� r , CITY OF HUNT I NGTON REACH 1 24 NQ'LJFI TRAFFIC VOLUME ' BEACH BL.VD NORTH 13F $LATTER AVE WEDNESDAY 4/11/84 END TIML S/9 S/9 TOTAL - - wrw.�r.rw.rw YMw'MM .wrwr►r r.+r�W�,w i : OA AM 283 0 293 2: 00 AM 153 0 153 3300 AM 1 L 6 0 11 b 4 00 AM 92 0 82 5: 00 AM 1i5 0 L15 600 AM 271 0 271 7: W AM 4L8 0 910 8: 00 AM 1552 0 1552 9: 00 AM 1471 0 1,471 . 10: Iv. AM 13ri9 0 1.399 11 : 00 AM 1496 0 1496 12: 00 AM 1706 0 1706 i :00 PM 1686 8TW 0 1686 2: 00 PM 176" 0 1763 T: OO PM 1,766 0 1766 4. CSC► PM 1841 0 1891 5: 00 PM t973 0 1973 6a 00 PM 24,)04 0 ^C04 7:00 PM 1779 4TH 0 177$ w R: oo PM 154 4 0 1544 , 9tuG PM 1275 0 12175 { 10:00 PM 1050 u 1050 ii : On FM 877 0 S77 .' 12 s oo PM S5 6 0 556 aeassssyss:a r. ssn enxssa == a mma r TOTAL 2 i 725 0 27725 AM FEAKHOUFt ------------ 't' F{ FI+iD TIDE S!8 E14D T I1~E 5I18 END TIME TOTAL. fi; , ..ww www .�rw r•.rirwr w.� wr�.a. Wwrrr►rr JwY �� �Mw ' , _ '`, �l i t 15 • 399 U z 0U 0 i l : ,15 .3�R . ` L L:' 30 400 Oa 15 0 1-1 t 30 400 11.1 45 03 30 0 i 1 : 45 44i! 12 s 00 467 Os 45 0 12: 00. S i.i'��lsC'�fclts lfsflltetS il��l7Zf17t� :'7RlJ17 w im u is a josoA 0061*04k. .3 TOTAL. 1706 "TOTAL 0 TOTAL w , PM PLAY.-Nt3UR ,Mr wr M►MMMW�YI..�MN Il 61. 1 IM�r .;7/9 .END TIME .S�9 - END- 'TIm'. OTAL . , S `�yr�i,,('. ,�. Wwww.w.+.�. ..��+.+r.r .. w...�.r.�.�.r w�W�W . ...w• .«rww: +MwruulA► 1 Gs ► 0 5: 15 Sit , St; 30,, 400 U: I5 O 5r a ' �IAK3 45`• .51 6 4 t 3a. d cr M fA *-b!a w V.ID• 1 4 s,IN A -K 0-4 A M l4 N o A,A ��r i�L�>rr ''ytn C •r t a" r t � r ' 'r r• ` CITY OF Ht TINOTON BEACH, 24 HOUR TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION BEACH BL.VD NORYH OF SLAVER AVE WEDNESDAY 4/1 1 /94 VEH 1 CLES PER HOUR END;_T I ME y0 YY22 10 Y 420 6630 Y Y840 y y y Y10ZO 1260 Y 1470 1`61�d `1 G" 3 �w�Y�MMw 7r'7r�T'lf'1��� f�������7� I77rA'��f�1C7R�1f'1'7 •RT'���R���1r�T����1TR���l►���'R�M� i t OO AM *o x 2: 00 AM St 00 AM *o x 4t 00 AK +*o x * Zs 00 'AM *o r. b: 00 A:'. o �; 7: 00 AM 8: 00 ISM qt 00 AM *o 1.0f01.) AM *0 i 1.00 AM 00 x i 2 t 00 AM *o :e _ i = 0fj PM �o :c 2100 F'M wo 3t 0 PM *o K 100 PM *o r 5106 Pbi *o x } 7 62 0O.'PM *n .7100 PM *n x .9100 PM n >6 Ilk I q6.0. +F 4 4 0 46 0 Ir M f iF�••►11 1i�� r;4 A i+1!#y 40 M-i► 0 0 i #A 0 4'i yl I. - CITY OF NtMTINGTGN BEACH 24 , HOUR TRAFFIC VOl.GJil'1E ,7 BEACH BLVD -- NORTH . OF SLATER AVE • THURSDAY 4/12/84 ` END TIME 5/9 S/B TOTAL ,. IsOO AM 316 0 316 200 00 AM 183 0 183 ;. 3:00 AM 138 0 138 4:00 AM 95 0 95 5:00 AM 110 0 114 600 00 AM 285 0 2195 700 AM 934 0 934 8 t 00 AM 1601 0 1601 9:00 AM lb66 0 1666 1000 AM 1468 0 146E 1 1 s 00 AM 1666 0 1666 12s00 AM 1720 4TH 0 1720 1 :00 PM 1842 0 1842 1 2:00 PM 2079 0 2079 - 3200 PM =:'3= U 2333 4:00 PM 1660 8TH 0 1660 52 00 PM 1271 0 1271 , 6:00 PM 715 0 715 7 s Ou PM 1-4 1L 0 1343 8: r. PM 1690 1) 1690 9: PM 1 109 0 1309 10:00 PM 1135 0 1135 11200 PM 6i7 0 817 ; 12s 00 FM 552 0 552 stet==2t=asx asp:u =Z3a=to �arz�ssa�At TOTAL 269?(:� Cr +b93 0 A.? PSAKHOUR ------------ ' END- TIME S/B END TIME S/B Er1D TIME TOTAL ' «rrafw+r. --- --- — -----ww« r"-------- 7 s , 45 497 08 00 0 71 45 '487' f; its -tom 479 Gt 15 0 d: -00 478 . 8 t . , 1'5 466 0: 30 0 8: 13 466 " f 8s 30 4"AS8 0: 45 . 0 8, 3d n8" 5 TOTAL 1819 'i•gtAL 4 TOTAL 1®i 9 � PM' PEARHOUR END TIME S/B END T I W w�SAD END TIME 'TOTAL •1 , L' I , ••, #W*fyr.M+Y�i ..M MMM�M . .r.�rrJ.wr « r«« rr_r►N ww�.a1 r1.4 Yid t 1�' 2 00 ra 2s ?d 552 15 66Q 08 15 0 21 AS 660 627 , " 0: 30 D : 2s 30 2t '4 577 dt 45 a . 21 45 577' �>,'i'Tt,•f,th ttl �.r, f ' '�7E��1����:•{ ���C10� S4yltill[l1StR�li� a7C7i'11r'yC `i$�=S)[il1IL'*IR' YR'i11R7�� i i •' JOTAL 0 TO,rAL :416 FWisV��.�.�,rL:+•t.'.,.-�...r a,'..f\=.,rT. _ i .� { 1. 1� t. . ._ - ', . . ." -. .. ...-.., __, _ ..'':...r --- — 1.r.1�„i • • r L CITY OF Hi.tW I NGtON BEACH ' 24 HOUR TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION BEACH BLVD' - NORTH OF SLATER AVE . THURSDAY 4/ 12/84 VEHICLES PER HOUR END TIME 0 240 4BO 720 960 1200 1440 16BO 1920 2160 � -------- **�•�****i�1M�F11`�**�*'M+itt�Mih�-�1'1h�•IFi�F�F#1i+F�FiF�t�4i►4**4kV*MMIF1iil 40 0*#04 1 : 00 AM *o M 2100 AM 3 t 00 AM 400 00 AM C 5300 AM *o x 600 API *o .7:00 AM +o ' 8 s 00 AM *o x 'd .9 s 00 AM *o �s 10:00 AM +o :c a i 1 a 4O AM 121,00 AM 4 o . :1 :00 PMt� x .100 PM *Q x r t 04 p,M *p x " 4: 00 FM *o x 4 .5 00 RM +►a 'c 6r4d PM 4ta x ' .,7=00 FM oc K st00 !eM *o x fit' • r � rr<r r 1 * 14 t•44 a!iE �r 3#t �!o* i�i r Al l� �►.R�.. :�AF q. 11+i4+k 4 #'� M, * !w/[ 1 f.0,110 s;41 7t o.4 lY Af 1k y } CITY. OF HUNT I,NGTON. BEACH 24 ML71J47 TRAFFIC voLu '.E 4 y s BEACH BLVD r- NOWTH OF SLATER AVE V , SATURDtz Y 4/7/E4 � END TIME , 6/H S/8 TOTAL. . M n 100 AM 654 0 654 2t 00 AM 46e 0 468 3: 00 AM 357 O 357, 4: 00 AM 107 0 187 r 5: 00 AM 134 0 134 + &t OO AM 1:5 0 135 7: 00 AM 241 0 241 8: 00 AM 325 0 325 7: 00 AM 653 0 653 • 1000 AM 910 0 910 L! t00 AM 1125 0 1125 . 12: 00 AM 1521 0 1521 1 :E10 PM 1525 0 1525 � - 2:00 PM 17.18 0 1718 3: ^4 PM 1600 4TH 0 1609 4 s 00 PM 1615 0 1615 5: 00 PM 1637 0 1637 6 . Un PM 1447, 0 '1443 7:OO PM 1305 8TH U 1:3Q5 8:00 PM 1 1 183 t? 9t00 PM 910 0 910 a ' 103.00 PM 805 0 605 U100 PM 669 U 669 12:00 PM 431 0 431 'j , ssasayaU=mwmc n=aaa =mum= wft.ItOlttildt m TO7AL 21460 0 21464 a ! AM PEA H t3{Jk ------------- FEND TIME 5/B END TIME S/B END TIME Tf1TtW... 'a r.�ww���w .. ..w.•.•...w �.���.•�r�. ..+rr+w. r�.�w ..w�w -. wr.-M•�. tit 15 319 i7Y 00 0 Its 15 319 11 s 30 462 0: 15 1) 1 1 t 30 462 1 t t 45 3$7 08 30 0 1 1 s 45 . 347 t2s 00 393 0: 45 0 122 W -393 Y. + . s.r�eaao�aeamr a3�sQ: usr=so��sm ssxtittt st.�tu�eaaaraoae ■ess,M�r -' TOTAL 1521 TOTAL 0 TOTAL 1521 A'. .t { yy rl ENS TIM 3/9 END TIME 518 E:�►D TIME TOTAti t, i/ w.M.wt•lr.. �•� w.�ww �����iKW �r�MY w�rwr...rrwww �.a..�Y� ) t `,) �, 15 411 4 r t 40 © Y: X 411 I r 30, -,' 422 01 15 0 1 R ' 30 4" +t . 01 30 0 1 : 45 456 , hR , VUIftAL14is"'a, imtmsam a n1.Wa� r 7'pTPN. k'�1 TUTS 0 TOTAL i;>!E CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH . 24' HOUR TRAFFIC 'DISTRIBUTION BEACH BLVD NORTH OF SLATER AVE SATUROAY 4/7/84 VEHICLES PER HOUR END TIME 0 y180 360 Yc ft544aYc a720 fy900y tY 1Y080a t y1260 Yy 1y4Y40 Yy 1i6e20 Y `4 y1 r�MrY�.MA� ��T���7T�9 'T7T"�7rf'lf'7r•7 �'R7r if 7r'7r/r f7�"7T'7'7Ti'T'.�7� f lC�lf7f'7r 7'7{'� C�711 f 1 ��7f'R if 7`l'R�l7r 1 s 00 AM *o x 200 0 AM *o 3200 'AM *o x 4: 00 AM, *o rs 5:00 AM 6:00 AM * 7: 00 AM 8:00 AM *o sc 900 AM o 10:00 AM * 11:00 AM *o 12: 00 AM *o st 1 i 40' PH *o st 2a t?O PM *o x . 3 e Oct PM *0 x 4: 00 PM 4o sc 51.00 PM *o x 6r00 PM *d x 7 t 00 -PM *o .c 8: 00 PM *e x 'psi 00 PM { i0ss 00' FM ' f It 00 P11 *0 40 PM CITY . OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 24 HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUME SLATER . AVE WEST OF. BEACH BLVD i SUNDAY 4/8/84 t Eh1p TI ME W/D W/B TOTAL - I wwww«�—rr www•.wr w..rwrw �.www��� 1100 AM 174 0 174 2:00 AM 105 0 105 3: 00 AM 65 0 65 4: 00 AM 43 0 45 5s00 AM 21 0 . 21 6: 00 AM 25 U 25 7 z Ora AM 44 0 44 8: 00 AM 98 0 98 9:00 AM 155 0 155 10 t 00 'AM 238 0 238 11 : 00 AM 320 0 320 • 12: 00 AM 434 0 434 1100 PM 421 0 421 2: 00 PM 428 4TH 0 428 :Z.: 00 PM 428 0 42S 4: 00 PM 488 0 488 5: 00 PM 474 '0 �,74 6: 00 PM 415 0 415 7: 00 PM 361 8TH 0 361 8: +:0 PM 297 0 297 9: 4+� PM 223 C� '?3 10: 60 Pt'1 226 G 3?6 11 . CIOPM 17 C) 173 1^s 00 PM 119 0 119 TOTAL 5777 0 5777 AM PEAK.HOlJR ------------ END TIME W/B END TIME W/B END TIME TOTAL. 11 : 15 94 0: 00 +;) 11: 15 94 . i 1-: 30 105 0: 15 0 11= 30 105 1.13 45 120 0: 30 0 111 45 A 20 i 2: 00 115 +J: 45 0 12: 00 115 fesssestaam saesra a�oest=tmsa aex;et�a a�ersae�seassa s,resss , TOTAL 434 TOTAL 0 TOTAL 434' Pit PEAKEOUR END TIME W/B END TIME W/B END TIME TOTAL. 1 www.w�...w� 'iMNV�i w.W•ywww ww Mw... M w�wr«ww�w w�YM ... C '3sf 15 ' 423 01 00 0 3: 15 123 30 136 O: 15 0 3: 30 136 ' e '4S 124 01 30 0 3a 45 124 . , 4: 00 05, G: 45 0 4': 00 105. ' •'.f wmz%&ia3w*& ''era=east ` ==== aggie 73'S' sxY:m �tY�at�fsjs lttCZas' 7h7AL. 488 TC)'rAl. o TOTAL 488 : C I fY Of HUNT I NOTON BEACH 24 HOUR TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION SLATER AVE — WEST OF BEACH BLVD SUNDAY 4/8/84 VEHICLES PER HOUR END TIME 0 50. 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 430. . 5( i e OU AM to x 2:00 AM , *o x 3.00 AM *o 4:01) AM *a I Z:00 AM 6:00 AM *o u 7 s 00 AM *d X. T 8:00 AM *o 900 AM *o 10:00. AM 11 :0C) AM *o ., * 12:00 AM *a 1 :4o. PM *d x ! 2 x OO PM *a 3: 00 Pm do x 4:OO PM *o x 5: 00 PM *w K 6:d0 PM *►o K f 7:00 PM +�o * `9100 PM, 40 x 9:00 PM. �►o s: 10:00 pM j2x00 PM #o , , �. _:. . , .:,*�iE#ii'114���'�F:�**��*}E�fr�***�*��K�!' ��F•w��� 1��F#:E�•�l'Safi•7h�hlhRro►����4��M�*��1��a, • s: W/B q W/B 1. m . -i a 0.0 to , 1 C!. -i i CO V V V F C . A ,Iw 0A 1 3 3) 1 0A0 ►& 1 3 i,-0LA0U 1 Al f 11 oLiON 1 In N >E +i !! Mr 1 rl Nn R] .- O .4 a) -4 O- MJh C4 IJ IJ 0 -a m *4Ot- ER 4b W N W !{ Z - • 6. _ * 1 ! va to N 10 N of so w N as tt as N N N t1 as k it M .M N as N •O li I) iti? H) 14'1 II t+ rF+ r I ti D N 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 010 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0-0.0 0 0 1 Q' a4btil (A t .w 0' It t>Q all ULA I w r a 6 o 000000000000000000_000 i -i w in'I y U 0 0 1 / V Q` V V I N I ►♦ >r' R TDD:DDDDDDD.DD.. i 3 D 8 33333333333333-3333333*3 3 1 fn 1! lJr�i R I Z . I Z II t < 7 QQCQ -4 N 0.000 1 1 3 -I N 0000 I 13 W 0 GI -0M %4U0U +p .4% A'.tbD—U m 1 -1 1 O N tt N I -1 I a ti1 --! In •DW -QQN VLA1.+ V0iJm0 80 (A NUi , i N a I r+ 1 -i N I "+ I ►` N !JN0D- W " GJ .8 m0" rr+ WVON •OM U. -1C -Sa N -lbW — 0 1 3 1 'D D N -D 0 1 3 I T D EMZ r a UI.GUo i A i F C' 8 UIOMo I m I m m -i -CN7t -1 - 1 >f i l N I ♦ I C N I -0 '4 O N I m 1 N I !D I T N ! w ♦. < Z O N �'S-0f30 i �? q OabO I v H GO �^ C+ � 00047C? 70pGO000a00GQ i IaiDO - s► hIf' eDDD f[ 1 m N I m UP _ A ! Z. . N I Z J I -i r !E • 1 t3 N 1 U q I O < -4 N (A U U,,t� 1 A N M -4 v .41 -0 It DI .� .. « .. I p N « .. 1 -t N N ••- W4JWCA -0WVU £AM 4* � .P0- Wt-- 1 -i N 0 N ►" V J r ,0 ,6 (A •a 0- -4 V O IJ W 0` -a 0 W ►� N W �' 1 D Al (A �•• 0 A, 1 3 D � C} D 4.{ �► I 3 *- N IJ --4 0 V, O, tJ ►+` U -0 ►� � O I]` �•- µ Li V O W �0 M r 4b v- I � t^ N 0UImoU I m r 11 OchGU i A 0 V 0` 0 V- 1 f' CITY OF HUNTINQTON' BEACH 24 HOUR TRAFFIC OfBTRIBUTION SLATER AVE WEST OF BEACH IBLVD MONDAY 4I9l84 VEHICLES PER HOUR END T I r tE 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700. .800 900 i t'00 AM *o x 2 r. OO AM *ox 3: 00 AM *ax 4: 013 AM *o:( 3: 00 AM :c 6: 00 AM *o x 7100 AN *o * 8 00 .AM 9: 00 AM *a x 10:00 AM *o tc 11 :00 All i t 00 AM *b 1 800 PM *� 2:00 PM *o K 3: Of) .pm *o x '4: 00 PM Ph 6160 Ph! *ta x 7:40 PM *o _800 pm *c x '00 PM *v x iorQO. Pm, 40 x 1 I'f 00'.Pm *0 x 12i 'Ph, �o � ; , : •'*�F•�+!!ai►�FiF�t*�*�1nt�'!F�►�!*�•��ti•��t�!•w•*t*:+ e�*•�*�a►�►���*4xa•�.��a�*���x••�x•��►**�!� L, �,, , r :' • . , _, �+ `, •c - NAP ,o � {�I/'� CITY OF HUNT1 49f..0N BEACH P 4 HOUR TFFAFF I•C VMUM E !SLATER AVE. — WEST 'QF BEACH BLVI) . ' TUIESDAIY 4/10/94 t END TIME W/o W/ip TOTAL '�•i 1 •_.' r wr�wrrr wr..w.FM �r�www rw�rwwwu :1.t 00 AM 161 0 i1 _ 2: Ua AM 30 0 30 34 00 Am 29 C. 12p k 4: 00 AM 33 33 5: 00 AM 4Z 4 6.00 AM 11" 7 . Q0 Am 0 373 8: CID AM 6b5 0 6'65 4:00 AM 40rd BTH 0 488 10: 00 AM 45P 0 459 1 1 : 00 ABM A 3: U �•3w 12: 00 Arl 468 0 44.48 1: 00 490 C► -400 3: 00 F'M 501 0 501 4 32 OCR PM 61218 0 6w4� 4: 00 FM 7w4 0 7_4 5: CIO Pm F3c?4 0 8'79 l:�U F'M UP1 8 �:� 91 El 1?: i:w F'/M 41 4 1 r) 0c, PM u �09 11 : Cif,*' rM lee 12: (X, F'm 11 to 1 1#2 I m�+�c.ao ra,ae as as�: se as y►:��: s��c.r, n sn as+t.+r!t.w.+wR TOTAL 9:;bo t'a ���yC► VIM F'Ef,41-:H0LJR E140 It I 11E Wf 1:+ Et END TIME W 11 END T I M4E `UTAL 71 :err 1&5 i CFO. C) 72 Mr.) 145 72 4z , i bra 01 11,10 1) 7: 45 •!A010 8.4 Of., "04 Cr 1 0 9.8 ('fit;•, 204 GIs i�i 142 L�: 45 U lot 15 1��. ,w��s�sarwae .rcaswsiwt +i�rsrcNcsawst scan►�a■a waanswrssw wwwww TOTAL 671 TOO AL 0 TC 471 Pm Ft CAv14QUFR ENC TIME . •W/'A Elms I I'mc W!bb END TIME T01 Al. . , ,15 247 0t 15 I.',r .'.�!' , , > ' )''�c.+isMii �►�e no:ri rur K,P., wwx w N:wraa�w xlA;i-eHv��u ..�. CITY OF HUNT I NGTOM BEACH 24 HOUR TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION . EA-ATER AVE - WEST OF BEACH BLVtI TUESDAY 4/10/84 j VEHICLES PER HOUR END T I"E 0 11>0 200. 300 400 500 600 700 904 + •••�+•••-�� 1FiF#i•#fF•1Fi�F#f#i�4;iF�1�lFt#+!F*41Ff►�F,11rIF1w�FfF�F�F4s1►f1F1F#4##•�*##4#li*#!i**�I 1 s OO AM *o x 2: 00 AM *o>: T: 00 AM #o:: 4: 00 AM 5100 AM *o x 6 t 00 AM *o x * 7: 00 AM 8.4 AM :. ILA:00 AN 11s00 , Ahi +!o 12 011 AM *o i 100, PM w o * 2:00 Pm *o ;c :00 Pm +o u 4:DO PM * 5 s OO PM 00 x r 6 i() PT! o �r 1 .7300 PM *ty x 8:00 tat? *o x 980 PM 00 x i to 00 FpM ♦a x 1'3 04X. Pm �►t! i� ' 1+#� ¢'' iFri *4!F•��Ibilil�lljAxil '.tiY �CME /b**� Ti7 }Iti*liQl4iiMrF�t� I#*• wis CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 24 HOUR TRAPF Y C VOLUME _ SLATER 'AVE -- WEST OF BEACH BLVD WEDNESDAY 4/11/84 END TIME W/8 W/B TOTAL. - __r__r_r .,•awry u•aw-,_r �rir rir+l i : oo AM 5:5 0 2: 00 AM 34 0 34 3200 AM 24 0 24 4 M 5:00 AM 45. •0 45. 6: 00 AM 164 Q 164• 7: 00 AM 451 0 451 8: CEO AM 690 4TH 0 680 9 t 0 ) AM 486 0 486 10: pan AM 420. 0 429 11 : 00 AM 424 0 424 12 t 00 AM 514 C 514 1t00 PM 521 STH U 521 2: 00 PM 542 0 542 3: 00 PM 612 0 4: 00 PM 747 n 747 5: 00 PM 992 0 892 6.60o PM 844 4 844 7100 PM 5 6 G 52& 8:00 PM 41 41 4`: NO() PM 10: rin Ptt 11 : �:11) Pro 194 194 12 t oo PM 173 U 123 ��rrYs�s�sx �zxxae ...xaar. -s=xs�asra ,4 TOTAL g363 AM PEArHOUF. ------------ END TIME W/8 END TIME W/@ END TIME TOTAL 7: 15 151 0: 00 17 7: 15 151 1 7: aU 162 0: 15 U ?: 34 162 7: 45 215 0: ZO 0 71 45 2iS lot 00 152 t►: 45 0 B: 00 152 TOTAL 680 TOTAL. 0 TOTAL. 6HU 'END TIME W/8 FND TIME W/O END .TIME TOTAL. r sw.w.•�a.ww.w. .1w«.r.ri r.w,rw.w..rwa rw•w•w..rr w�rwr.,...__ �.wa.•�_ ' r�, _• 4: 45 234 0: 00 A 4: 45 224• S R �►0 238 0 a . i 5 a 51 W 2311 r4 ; t 15 `217 02 30 0 '8217 ,, _ 51 s0 27 �;+_ 45 n 51 3f�% 227 �f11.1fi'3�•flt�lr; .' �Ttlr�� �ill�'�ailt�l� YTtx."9a1� fS�lOita11L7R1t 'tlR}trY1! ' TOTAL TOTAL 7.66 CITY OF ' TINoTON BEACH 24 HOUR TRAFFIC DISTRIPUTION j SLATER AVE - WEST OF 1A►^.H EL.VD WEDNESDAY 4111/84 VEHICLES PER HOUR END T I"E 0 . 90 100 270 360 ' 450 540 630 720 , 8 i4 .:_._....._ �,F6�t���*��►w�►�r'r��s#+r�►**�+►a►�ws•ww��►�tws�►w+►w�►�►�►w+�w4�►�'+t•�r*��� ���ff�wl 1 i CPO AM *o x 2: 00 AM o K 1.. 3 s')0 AM *ox • w { 4 t OO AM *ox w 5= 40 AM *o x 6:00 AM pro x • a 7: 00 AM 8 s CPO Ah'1 9:00 AM *o x 10100 AM *a 11: 40 AM *n r , 1 :00 Pm _00' PM *0 x 3:00 i'M wd x 4 x 00. PM. *o 8 t 00 .Pm *Q x i tab Pit to rt 7=00 PM: *o I z' 108 00 Y1lr'i l " r 7 0-fo40*0****q;0,f.o**.o!* **# # 3�Mi�f.'�i� ► � � wrM�K �A �11�.ie1►#+r11'. Cl TY OF KNT I NGTON BEACH 24 HMA TRAFFIC VOLLPM SLATER AVE - WEST OF BEACH BL.V!! THURSDAY 4112/84 END 'TIME W/b r1i/8 TOTAL 1: OCR ,'4M 35 O ,35 ' k" 2:00AM 26 O 2b 2=00 AM 25 0 25 f 4: 00 AM 69 0 6$ 5: 00 AM oy25 0 2 6: CKJ AM 521; U 529 7: 00 AM 6.2 4 7H 0 6 2 8: O0 AM Sn G 57:3 9s OCR AM T86 08b 10t C10 AM 448 0 448 11 %00 AM S14 8TH U 514 12: 00 AM 568 D 568 1 . GC FM 514 4 U 514 2s OG PM 645 0 645 3: 000 PM 791 0 791 4: 00 PM t?71 0 971 fir: 00 PM 50 5U� ' - 6: 00 0 Pm 179 0 179 7: 00 PM 1471 0 147 6: 00 PM 107 Co 107 9: 00 Pm 1 1 7 (► 117 10.- ci(l FM 5 rr b:, i (KI FM 9 r� 9 �aatscraa��as �ss ¢sfi .._�cssm s=-ritosss TOTAL 81 ]7 0 8117 ' ri?1 F'E.f-i1 HOUR END T Z ME W J 8 END I'1 ME W!B E130 I I M TOTAL ' 6: 00 154 n: OCi U .61 OU 1.54 IS: 15 171 U: 15 0 6: 15 171 a { 61 10 01 ZG 0 b: SCE 61 45 148 Us VS U 61 +45 146 ' SItIsNml0lo s =BLUM= Iftnus: ii Oman . TOTAL 692 TOTAL U TOTAL. 682 1 PM PE 1.0" " oo :' x ft W/o END' TIME W/9 M T'1ME TOTAL s��9►�•+ �.•.w+.�w w.w.__w w.rr► -�rr.r� �w�+.W..��w ww-•M.+. ., s 51 15 210A C11 OCR 0o . 21 15. . 219 ' , �y .45, .V 9'zls.1 :�Cry.T}L7nf`:b ,7bOM.Y,'1R1R ' 113TA v Q7'' ,�, �, t,, '_ ' ' , tt�`�c,:• ��� �n;rya.. 4 -. ', t 1- • • CITY OIL HUNT IN6TON SEP" 24. HOUR TW.F t C D Y S TR I VU1 I CN SLATER AVE - WEST 13F DEACH OLVO THURSDAY 4!12!64 VEHI C XS PER HOLOR ` 'END, T Z ME '0 • 100 2M o00 400 OL, 600 70# EGG �o � ,�.�._.�...�_ �r�r��►+rn-wrr,wt�*��r�•�r�►r��r��'rf�►•��-�trr�►rrf�r�M�'r4r�r��ww���n��►��rr�� 1 r oo All is x 2:00 AM 3.00 , car 4: 00 AM �a x • s , s a Oct AM •o >c • :w 6: oO AM �Q x 7: 0-0 AM B. AMo r. lb 00 AM i O t OO AM *o N. 06 11 : 00 AM ra Ze 00' pm rc k 3:00 FM oo x 5:00 Pm 010 x ' 6100 . prl x 7200 Pr! -00 it , gat. 1 2yy 00"AI 34 Ir rjf t t, f �rt�lt�'�' 1kKf�►*Ar �wM-.�4+'rf #�i4-41 M?, 1MInel* , •. LPP611DIX � Qbservstfo.na ,� ! k�t&h This appendix contains the results of queue length observations at various Wendy' s locations. j i • J ! IvS J �` , , r •• it l° jY AA1riZIO Lo rial vest of Vacb4r ,ll df`i *a ustia '@outb of tako11e ), , ,/ -' � • "so -Cralin mast Bch•of io �r 2 11s 'l . tt 3 Z 6 t 1ZL"� 6 3 b sQS !�.!!. 6 3 c1' 1 �I0 `1 4 = nil �•;2 ,;ti 1 • ftell rJ,} _ s1S i 5 4 (,�44 Z r2bv s �'+4r 1 fti3 2 4 t 1 t 3O /�� ,.1 r� �i ,'• :I - 1 ',• + _ !'i.`' i �' �l=��i.'t1„Si�' t•1 V 1"<�<t(i�r l�r !, r 7 Lt '1 }I:r �•1 , I � Ci }l �'f�r 11 l• l,i`r,-! 3 I�t 1' t t, ~� ' i }.� r� �T♦t� r.r}♦ J%'�,fl l i`.w,• ,' J.= ' ,= r z , ' ' _ ` 5 1 f .._`; /! +:. �i:�)'^a r�'Yf p�, r Il � � ! fi3A t Il 1 1• t t,,1 t•-(.�::!..1. al'{ �1 .:1js Yr,�ti,' .r.. ...�.. .� .,.1 f_a, ^�r�('�4� ., r .. � ����.'_.� t'� •� t' r. .., Y .L'. 1 1 t: The fo11 via tour Wendy'• Cite layouts Wert made for , coapa risoa purposes with the original proposed layout to dote rains if the origiasI Jay*ut could be improved. It could not And still have an atooptablt buildioj layout. `r 41 I r y" rril yl A4' l / r Alt ' r't Mtn Ar.D Li �i.1llDllk� D ure Zl � � �it:ILpfI�Y C Ar 1 + 1 rF1 1 •� t { .t t �y Rq_ I A � c J BUIL 436 D . N Iy 2 4 RNMU NG zZALLs r. ..•.. � ,, � �1t�r.�t.i Y A t�.�tt;twt tttaq��W� -� l l •3 • G U ( t. t i 5 3 �lil�'iJDY'a� i AC14 ECLLF-VAM cf tY r 24 fARICIMC� 5`t'ALL'5 f IL !II-Mws 1 1 � 1 �lgur" 1 �7 • E<)ULr--V,ARD 'r w�rwwwww r� 1 I r 15UILDlF-13 D IIE le RUtJ'f 7UZN ONLY 3 4 � 5 1-7 FAP.WNO S`M-115% s • G I � r G r A2PENDIX 3 rim =r020sed- t , , r ' • IMTA CENTRE SITE PHOTO* .. �r;_ ;•�. '�;.•1 Ta y.r_..,,-,rya.-.j.•t7�"�:L"..v '..'• ,� i�+� ".fin. 1 ti� y T� Lor,king northerly from prnnosed Trendy's site oft, ZZ w - _ r. .. ! ," L •o. _� �1 .. :�»`ram yr bo-Aing. northerly along Beach Bou' laVA d "fly southerly drive approach an Beach Boulevard Looking ♦ alongBoulevard toward w J � Photo of proposed I l APPENDIX B Photos of Exie%}ng Y ad 's StOM A Go dgn Wei SkLet &ad AST, -R�,l PEOTOS OF EXISTING WENDY;S E► WEST STREET IND EDING ROME r � f r Lookingdrive oil Looking ~1 r M • ._.. •fit.-��+ `�S�t.;.� j' ''•-:.�•'s.•��» ..�; - ::.r:`��:�-•;,^..,1,�.. . + .'� �i` +R•'� k .:fit• .. ,s:�r}.;�+:.r•. •�y '•L-rwi�`��M�w'.�#•�i•.d-••�•►1�w:rwrl7 � .:�r^���.- a�i�S�-'�-� Looking westerly at drive up WinA01w at:d Golden West Street exit. _ +e- IL Aw •r' a ion•, MZ~�� + .tit��: ' �. i•i• � •�'•.r ram• •.«.�.� � �, Looking 'soutberly &ICUS Golden West Street frm Wendy's exit w `