Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Conditional Use Permit 88-57 - Coastal Development Permit 89
I I i yrl M I. I 1 I }..tt ,ry, I lu Pu011l,% 1►d.uoUybinsnl>< Ot ^II f+I• .+ IhCtudln�publK nt:l �u! t,h Gecrd• of In• Superlor Court of Oringe ounly, C ,r,Ljt Wnia, ►rumtar A•6214 drtled 4'9 Se1311rnber. 1971 and 1 �' A•?4631 Qm1&d 11 Juno. I953 Cr _ 4 S i'ATE OF OALIFORNIA � � . tit••-r Cc)unty M Orange Pw4s Kau A0.0111M,� [i.rM .� V ov ISM •11dbA1 is !N in POI" , /I + 'I/� .40 16 `.C/ Cot~woo I am a 0!Izen :)f the United States and a ,avident of the Co-znly ?-" resvid; tarn over the age of elghteon years, ano nol a par iy to r" jnteresf',id isi •he below a entitled matter. I am a principal clerA ..f the Orange Coast DAILY PILOT, with which Is combined the NEWS-PRESS. a newspaper of general cimLflation, printed anri ;•:tblished to the City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange, State of California. rnd that a Notice of Pub19 c Rea King of which copy attache 1 hereto is a true and complete copy. was printed and published in tha Costa Wna, ; Newport 9er h, Huntington Seach, Fountain Val.ey, Irvine, the South Coast communities and Laguna Swsch issues of said newspaper for t time consecutive weeks 10 wit the issue(s) of ' r , _ A _ i l 20 1�8 � --- --- _ - - , 19a— , 1 declare, under penalty of perjury. than the foregoing is tru6 and c-�.-► Ite!:t. OEcecuted on —Aar 11 3 a _ , 1989 ._. at Costa lima, Callfornie, Ir'AI2nature I PnOOF OF PU'SUCA'110N 1 40 W, Notice of Action Co&►; ta►l Development permit No . lq"% Page Two Pursuant to PRC S. 30603 , an appeal, by an aggrieved person count be filed in writing, and addressed tot California Coastal Commission 245 W. Roadway, Suite 380 POB 1450 Long Beach , California 90801 1450 ( 213) 590--50 71 The appeal period begins when tho Commission receives this notice of action and continues for ten ( 10) working days . Applicants will be ►tati f ied by the Coastal Commission as to the date of the eonclu8ion of the Ccmmission ' o review period, and as to whether or not an appeal has been filed. Applicants are advised not to begin construction prior to than date . Prov.isions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code are such that an applicad:ion becomes null and void one (1) year after the final approval # unless actual construction has begun. Connie Brockway City Clark 'rj 1 x 61 cry Ol 141 w � 1 W `�� I _.... •ter �i.rir�, � • _.�.. ._ A .. I � ` ...._.. •—,...ram\ ••.•„-•-- . T I -MOO i Sri REQUEM FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION &*w0 tW to Honorable Mayor L-id City Council, Submithdty. P .ul E . Cook, City Administrator� �I haprWby: Michael Adamsj Director of .Community* 1Develcpment Sum; APPXAL -W) Ft.AM1*0 COiMNSION 1 S "OM AL OF COMWITZ(a11 RL DEG YT 38-5 7/COASTAL DRVEWPMEM PErNT.T 89'-2 AND WXIA6i, OF C OHDITIOWM EX(.MPT ;'%X 89-1/SPECIAL SIGN ''B; 1-A 8d-6 (M- Whom Wir coundl Pv"iayt I ) Yes I 1 Now PoWy or Excepdon Sataermd of It oa• p rnrtMndadat, Armi-pia, Fundift Souro*, Aftsm, atIve Actions, Attechmmu: Transmitted for your consideration are appeals submitted by tl Councilman John Zroki ne, J lei chael Thompeon exid Scott Kimbell to that I►lana;nq -)mission' s approval of Conditional Use Permit No . 88-57 in con unction with Coastal Development Permit no. 89--2 and denial of Conditional Exception (�.►ariance) No. 89-4 and Special Sign Permit go. 88-8 (.Applicant : Richard A . Armstrong) . Conditional Use Permit No . 88-57 and Coastal Development Permit No - 89-2 were conditionally asn:uved by the Planning Commission with a . . rev"seal site plan (see Attaclime�nt No. 4 ) to permit the expansion of an � .eating Taco J411 Restaurant b•,- adding a drive thru window ar.d expanding the parking Area onto en edjace+nt 30 foot wid% late. The Planning Commission denied Conditional Exception (var,,ence) No. 85--1 for reduced landscaping and parking requirements and also deni6d' 8peoia3l. Sign Permit No. 98 -0 . a rtaquest to modify the existing nonconforming 15 foot high pole sign. The ezlsl:irng Taco Bell Revtsurant is lficated at the northeast cn=ner of Pacific Coast Highway san4 Ninth Street: in the Downtown Specific Flan District One. aen is r;�,8.e Apt ion on rnbruAly 22, 19t9 : on motion by Leipxig and second by Williams, the Planning Commission continued Conditional Use Permit No. 88-57, Conditional Eatceptran (variance) No. 89-3, Coastal 1)evelopment Permit No. 89-2 and Special 819n ftsarit No. 88-8 to the March 211 1989 Planning Commission swtiia AM ditected the rp1:49f licant to realign the drive-thru lane, A additional landsc^ reduce or eliminate alley access, f;. And game the Pacific Coast Highway drit 4wsy, by the following t I ipaiy, Willlo lm, 62atoat bourguignon, Ortega, Hountford, . $ i �I � , , 4 .fy wr 1 " IN p1 �rvD► l� Cession >~ac:n[t,~uendation �D�.. �^ i4n on_ MArc 21 , 'Vul: �n Motion by Leipzig and second by Muuntford, the Planna ;iq Conwoission approved Conditional Use Permit No . 88-57 and Coastal Deeveloptaerzt Pa.:.-nit No. 89-2 (Alterr_ative B) as modified by t':la Planning Comaissii`:ii with findings and revised conditions o� approval (nee Attachiaent ft. 5) and denied Conditional Exception (variance) No . 82-1 and Special Sian permit No. 88-8 with findings , by the following vote; AYlCl3t Leipzig, PYatos, dourguignon; Ortega, Mountiord HMS: iii 11i,IMM Ar"'ENT: Kirkland gaff n iQn: Staff recommends that the City Cniincil uphold the P) anninq s pp Commission' s approval of Conditional Lisa Psrmi.t No . 88�-57 and � Coastal Development permit yo. 89-2 as modified by t:id Planning Commission (Alternative B. Attachment, No . e) with findings anu revised conditione of approval and denial of Conditional Exception (variAnce) Ou . 89--1 and Special Sign Permit No . 76-5 with findings per Attachment :lo. -f and the following n6ded/revlaeti Conditions of Approval: ADC: An hourly trash monitor, i%ig system to survey the si% a add adjacent properties shall be implemented. ADO: 3 . b Palm trees shall be clustered and vary iv size; minimum true height shall be 10 feet. . ADD: 4 . b. 6 Construction of streat lights as deemd required by the Public Mdi:ks bepsrtment. ADD: 4 ,b. 7 Remove and reconstruct the pavement to the centerline of 9th Street . REVISE: 4 .b .4 Remove and reconstruct the entire alley sdlacent to the rear Taco Sell property lire to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department . . The proposed project is a request to expand the existing 1, 637 Square foot ,Taco Seri restaurant by adding a 150 square foot drive-thru wrindowr and eexpenOing the parking area onto an adjacent 50 toot wide lot with a varlanca request for reduced parking and r landscaping zequiressfits . The proposal also includes a request to � mollify an aRisting nor-Conforming 15 foot high pole sign. w ' 5/1/99 (2408d) i 1 r 1 M , w� 1• y The ;?lannlrq ►pproved the. Taco 1- 11 axpanalart With a revisxs� site plan (Att achmant: NO. 4 ) whicY: included a 150 square foot drive-thru wi.ndcjw, 30 sparking spaces (25 ast:and3rc1, 5 stacking crcdit:► , minimunne 10 fo ,t landscaped planter along Pacific Coast gflghwar and a mo ximum 7 foot high monument sign. The Planning ,, ,somif- sion daniod the applicant ' s variance ar.oquest for reduced laredsea��pi rq along Par:if is Coast Ultghw,�y and reduced perking and also denied the sx)et~iul coign permit~ t^ modify the existing 15 foot high r+ yncetitit'tP',ecmir.e 4�ole sign . The appeal letter, (At.tachineent #2) received from Councilman John Erskine noted that a minima . amount of rev-.taliration was pr,.rposead for the eexpernedec: use; and because the site in located adjacent to the De7wntorin Redeeveslo7 3meent Dro;eect area , ca eeful consideration is required to ensure architectural compatibility. As outlined in the staff report dated March 2l, 1989 (Attachment No . E ; , aspects of the Downtown Design Guidelines have been incorporated in the planning Ceoiami.ssion approved project . The 10 foot lanCscapee d front yard neatback is provided which resf.lectee the landscaped corridor image developing along the Pacific Coast Highway streetscape. The existing 15 foot pole sign shall be removed and replaced with a monument sign reflecting the Downtown Design Gieidelines . In addition, Ui1es existing billboard located on site will be removed prior tr.) the issuance of building permits which takes into consideerat,ie�n the Downtown Design Guidelines are►i the policies of the General plen and they Coastal Element . it should also be noted that the existing structure and the proposed r,dittion shall be reviewed by the Design Review Board (Cceuiition # 2d) on April. 20 . 19691 to ensure that -L:hee structure is architeecturaily compatibles with the surrounding area and in conformance with the Downtown Design Guidelines . The revised elevations will be presented at the City Council meeting . g.. _2: The appeal letter (Attachmaot #3) received from J. Michael Thompson and Scott Kimball noted concerns regarding noise, alley use, pollution and trash . The staff report dated March 21, 1989 (Attaec:h►rimkit No. 6) outlines the concerns noted by Mr . Thompson and Mr. Ximball with the exception of , allution. The following is a brief response to each conce.ru : BStiik. The appeal letter states the; the project was apprweed for an audible ordese zing system without consideration or reguirawnt for a non-audible system. The revised site pl&n an approved by the Pl.shnioeg Commission locates fLeey menu order speaker system adjacent to the eexiating resateurent building in a location that is away from the Aparts *at residents to the north and the motel to the eaut: . In 04 W1 - $001189 -3- (2408d) � c � r • AMr, Y, +•',M� .,rat'' , ° dive of Action ll 4te1 Gevol.oprent Permit No. O Two Pursuant to PRC .S. 34603 , are ,appeal by an aggrievida parson must be filed in writing , and addr e s !-ed to% Californii CoAstal. CommisRion 245 W. eroaf!,4ay , Suite 380 P08 1.450 Gong Beach , California 90801-141Q ( 213) 590-5071 The appeal period begins when the Commission recaivts this notice of action and continues for ten (10) working days . App� i cant$ will be notified by the Coastal Commission as to the date of. the conclusion of the Commission ' s review period, and as to whether or not an appeal has been filed . Applicants are advised not t j begin construction prior to that date . { Provisions of the Huntington Betach Ordinance Code are such that an application becomes null and void one (1 ) year after the final � approval , unless actual construction bas begun. � Ala M. - � We,�twostri Clerk r , a 4;vi ..;f�:;fir,:•.},, ,. Y. , p 3T i1 h i/r „ ♦ISM+A y ! la,.'iA + ! .! i� ' i 1 A ti n k S yr , I' 'Y ol -71 - rFrry x l a 46 ' r 4 ;•r,,! I •, �t • � �'\y•`fir ...1�� i C7 1 T ?i i fill !I • �• i �"— Y.Y., ._,"_ •. a 45 Y t Z a'. k 1 5 �I r ' �7N1 Y,� / ti�lr, �,y.'..•rttii �4, e,. rr r.ar � .�.a +�J ' , �l 70, *0 Arl • ti I ��• .� JAG 1 .-- � h _ - - kle 16 �'�" �,� �•!/' �i-•ram .. -•.�Ttrty M,�,l-�,5,.�'�,r�.-. - , •TM�'ly: •.i •'y� iA�L. E :�:.,• „ .ter •�r,�, y t.� .y • 't'f"Irl '.l • - oy *. r:t { B ti' - •. 1 w '�f� ,'fir •''s"�jj 7'4.• r+. "fir. �' r, fir.'' �.y • , `�''xv1 1 •.� } t . i : M :!y�•.. ••h 1!� it f',!, •� �1'q\'� r µ�• + ., rA., , 'S•,.. .1 �N( �f;,t'a�r,' �,y'�. 1 �i.r+T Y ,�, ', r% 'ry5. r .'� ��,� ,tr, ,,,{, 1 ••�•'•' '�i�'.1'1' {'�.1, IL', a "4Z,r�• 1;� Jim lip 'N , �:f'p yr . ..�Mrci•�t• ,.' �A 17 �'. '� .y, `� .,j!''1 a .'r`Y,t. , .�'+Y; ;. i .. A ,•Y ?,;t,t+,:�'.lr�l'' I F,� 1_•, ' ,� '•'� :fir. �,..Y• r,��:"';• •I;; 'I` Y',`i , r - r M', :',, •!�, .•',��r!*r;, S • .1, ','4� � r f •. ��,. �.�14 � q f�/" ar,�.r• A,,l � IA r 4 �'l '�,fjf 1(rtrA tir'.,t .Y�. FYI�'..i �•T" '.�• I . if/ A/ t h,ft'0 j"•r at .�.ti(Y { 1S S�' f• , r 'I Ir, ,� 't� 1 �'. w1'i• + •A Yf�A. 'i� '•+' ',' ��'rk ' r �;r l,dh 4�� �'y�l�r.� r .V ..y' I� `, ��r '';F;,'�1 `.{.�t,��yN y :.f� y�J��`',;.;5� .1.' , ..��jl^�Y�s r��� 'I�a •rr I ,, r '!'' ,r �,11{ `�.�, 11 +', Y Sr•{ 4�,/, I ;,X i/',rr...t yy�,' Y { t' , ,�(,� ,5{/ �' �I 'i•' �h" ' fits '1,• 4•• r ,,., , '� . , ' '� �"'�` `•''��� �''• '. � 'Y 1 .'�•i�,''{i:'171,4!' k �,j����aL' iy.Shli!'' , •••PPP ' !1,`:`. r ... r, ., R�'„ :q, � '"• �, �, �,•. .• r 'r 1 r � -1 sr•y 11 Lt+1'I�4•F t �f.l.a�'• 1 r ..� POT r ' r z' rn i r-t „ IA lrtti, i ' r. n .'� `'.r w i1 .h y,/ �+.� i 1�f,•7• •W4.4CtO '1•'r.',� Y il.e 1 '' . '1� 1 l AI':� ql Ir.1 4L,, j�•b�;i'tl� '...,•'�•' � � • �' •'�li •., 1 ' t •;• ,. '�... - ' Y-rw •l' j'I� rq/ �Ij '1 rp "+;'ry"• ', fir.', '��.,' ' ,r!t • •�'. 1 � (i pr. Jet. I. � •�,' .'V .•� , ' 'ram►,'M - la , • JJJ rn. t - •�_ �,_t ,dt +i,. •ter'` - ` - - . - r.. ;;•� f.+• �, �y1F�".11�; t.,h`r ',K, `•'i K. i,'`r�rj � »�rl �� t",}T:r r }�• 1'rhl' I r��• +r y L ,.� •ter �,�,+ , !,yK T r,*�1fT:.,N r:1<,...i�•�'�: �1.Z' lV.. rr ..Sf w tY ;c,�r • r r1' ♦ �•rr L � R Y`' •1 %r y i�� «.•�1�'�� .! � -}r� r.i�,,•>.sr�� �/} r��J.�}���� ,f la T�•1\y'�«/ 1 > >,ti- r`� d*'� r. ,t ,.4?�,v(1 yl��a/'Ak � r •w}$��y•� 'v'. S• ,_ 1•,If F ' /L ! �/2 ., -' Yj�. ry, - - ! - 1 I `.�«,M•I^!["Ff�/`�. •\.G��`-•r{j.'V"-Y.�R,b j,:•�[,,[�,�•rl tF f�7�` ?t fY ^�. i fir.. _ �. , :-i' _ ! k' rr.r. a� �-A�� f 6r.y�� a`;i �,• 1 . + .r rnl .7. 1 M� )r f. �- HI: ti �,:�, 'r f •r,l•. ��•-�r� d�.'c ,-�...+C _. ._ ra . .. ryM..(I.Y! �^�� i•. ,i a,,. a.r r•)11+.. �,' -. �, a'.. _ ,`7- y Y \• ' I. � .,./ly�r�:.�i"• �rt i ",��� � ��'� Ir 34 74 /� .r-^4-'L I'• Y•- ..' -. - 4 - I- _ _ a i . ,1 M 11 �_rY � J. � • •s . - •` � •i•,r l � r� a, :�!pr', .%4,F rl - t�1i 4*r.• �{ •, r 1 ti �' - -Y' , ♦ ♦ /\ \ - l.I.�n V��f}+.�•� I met `` � kr r •� ._r - A r �rr �` il'}V e- .�1�- �!-*• .lfrr-_�K��� :.J.r , 'k�,ll'`F!'�I")���� 7.�1. �--_ I •'. '��.r '�• f', .'�. .i+}•- �•+ .Y,,. Mhtr�tl �f�'�� �.-rl«,����-� ^h\-'' ,. ..mot .;- ;ny- A.r �t(ti�$r >h�/r �\,.''� �` - -,.,�' 1 •'� �f'•,ry'- 1 Nl�i• V_ �t� :�y.. 1. .r� ,` �• �,. i, r. - �''� r r:.a � '.- �1 jriFA � • "r•r• �'1 •Wfr !y ,fir y"►'' 1' �„/ � r a .�1,.. `.`�rT" „r. S F _ `fir. _ 5. - - e_• f ,. V . t ..■�yw t\fl'•�4`► .1 11 ,..-•�,� . _ t_ F• - �' f{krh ' - .'l� �.. ,.Y,. fig f ..- ' • .3 ',• �, _ - 1 t- .. I. Ir •,L a.N + 4r+ k, �< K• v- a"SIP ` 1 '1' r ♦ .. :�.. lk , _�4 tl t_ ,fi ,_ ♦ N• - •'�'ff 1 _ �. '<.{ ..1;1t' 1 '!lam• H � t• X S'�•. �:�, t ' - �"�""�" ', `-.� {•llxr ` � M ■r,'J •:/M1 ..` � •;."tir fr r�. t•`+ .t h +. •i •. •_. \a,• :'1' .,x' .. r�.' -j\'6 iyarr'. - �� �t,: �k � -x i •,F• f.r" t ram', ; ♦ .i. e r is %1�• � .1,, s''!�1► {.i•. 1 .+ rr'ti A ''.r� .•�.P�, ` - a 1. ,-\\t' t _'-. ; .,. I J '� ' t it ra fw N A r k • i• 'fl - � {{t r A n" r,1 ww •► •, H1. !��i� -•.v. t 4 q �1 •� r f �. _, �-+r+a _ ... ._ J Ir�,�s �•. ,,r•� . '.• •Y ,�, • ,�<, \;'�le/.rtir} _ ItkNIS`,w . I _1 s .I :._t'.L� Y�r.- :f t ..•. n. - i ' irk } 1 r, y�', T 1 '•• Ir 1 ! , t r r 1f,• ,11 'L � .r f1. } r. Ln Qj fz '• 't r :•,�wr:�.'►1aaM„�ti;�' i �' j-,. � '�) f�i"r �� +' f 6,,'1�' �'ti�l. ,• .�Y'1�/ "�. ,al:,,'. �'�l '�ati ail�'+f+� .��i(i.:.': N r+N `. �' �f .ham� ,ti�,,,' �.'� '�'� y�l,• rU :� .II A fu •: L rt: O } „ i - � .,+•• ,�'f tit•°•�►�/ i.; \p+�1 11a `�1j dJ�i6 ',•• '�iI` ' fyt��7��'i ii j ' ,. YI•' �T.yn, 7•'}'�,r'.1 i, , ; r.��\ ,. •' {T� r'� ,+r r•,�' ,t��r`��, � •. 'y }fra r i � 'ti'. .,� 'ri.jy�. 1.i a, r' �r,P. 1 ,�Yrf , 11• ,'r., •.11�j. '�' y,,..', .Y(,� + \ ..t jy){',.JF 4,r _ t';i. 4 r, r, '_i, r ,,t •+•r V r ,r '�'S :+ '.LyAb Al it a• }) ..fir F�1 ,�`+� y M. < ,� r Sy, 1 2r r, r ,, r `, \ ' '� T 'n }, Y' � ,� •fNi r ,: 1' :fir, y�i `n, h ' '^•.r1 �r �y, �f T� ^•'V Ej^' E+ ,'�,�� ww' /�� Ja�� ,`,,1tfV�Ftc •r r '�� .tirf •>.•. a C"' 1v .1y + rl.; ,�,� \•y ~ .i�"• 5 � r, 1� .,, r r. S � lay�11 ti•r -�,.M�/`•' � f' ��, ' / ,I.t, t/ �:,. a ,.. �� ;i� •' •�} �t / � 1 �''. NAB � r'1. F ' . �� � J••' ."•t+lr +• ' .•'�� 'i� a, ' � .�V.�{ ' {`��to ! �LI �r fir...+�� �'t w�; ,�,'•. �J,� r,, y \,��.}; :' {'�•'aEd=•r I•. ' .t 7. • ' w r t•1 �i�, .F� '� ",�y r .�' ,/�'i r� r „,�'+rF it�' '�• 1 f ILr••Y . '. :�'r '•ice" a , fi��� , '.4, '- a+ n •,"�� \ �� ry1. �''+ " t,�r!4 !�•, r;1,4 y {. •�,�y�Jr u •t 1. `�j +� r 1 r � �•e.,;, i +� , a�•"' 7 +iy +�� �~�ilE' 'Me .r., ti '�{a + r "'� a t ,y 1 t �r. 1�,'r..j r4 , ./, 71!�,�,'Z��Lt It •+L 1.~�h�Y� ,�r,, �` � k- �y '�YI ��r J � �'• L Iy�a 7f•d ' i 1' r a!• , 'yyf i1 , I i r� �n LI i City of Huntington Beach ��AMA •G�V MLIFORHIA 9R648 Don Schmitz California Coastal Commission 245 W. aroadway #360 A•1 s.: �l �1;A1R,;; e4 ; M• 'ir 1 .i r• 4`� jj}�µ��y� •'M�i ice,1 , �,�,,-.��'i,'ir�±�±1'�•'�i.i.` � , 1 1 �j ��•Y''11�r`��' ��'y�44 Y Y � �:� 7 f.11,•. 1 �'�1� 'ed _.' _..bn�_._e9rY_f��,l•'S ..,d��.l�, .r l ,�. � I�x.r.� Y...,.,l � �.. n � _ ._.... ' ., �'�., .�.lj•�tJVi•�twQy qr S?ALEY...O?1ff,._ACTJQJ_0L T 1 1Y COUNCIL Council Clo,.nber, City Hall Huntington. Beach , California Monday, May 1 , 1939 A tape recording of this meeting is on file in the City Clerk' s Office. Mayor Pro Tempore M,%v5 called the regular meetings of the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach to order at 7 p.m. WLL CALL . Present: MacAllister, green, Wlnchell , Mays , Silva, Erskine Bannister irrived 9: 10 p.m. Absent: Note A��rtAA��A+�k��#A�,MA�A1hAt�AA� �A���* 4AMr1r��1Y+rkAi,AAAAAMMArYAA�t�dtIFA�AYyM�� FAA#*�h�AAA.� WtY -C d 1 I Mso,'.LIC BEARIN APPLAL bF PLANNING CEM_ ION S AP4RGV,11. Q W ,5&=57 IN 3UNCTIQN HUH COASTAL DVf_FAI-RER I DENIAL- E "[)JJJQMSPECIAL �T - PE IT _88_-8 — P NNJfl MISSION 15 MEW AEQ APPEALS QENIEQ REVISAL MITIONS PKMED AA AAAIIAAA����rk�AAA1r�#/klYlwN+f�AAAAAMJtAtY��IYAAA1Y11AAA�11�##rkAA1i�11tA�iA.�1M: ' /rAAA4�rAA+wA A motion was made by Mays , seconded Green, to deny the appeals • and uphold the Planning Commission approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 88-57 end Coastal Development Permit No. 89-2 with the following findings and revised conditions o,' approval and doni.a1 of 0nditiona'! Exception (variance) No. 89-1 and Speri a I Sign Permit No. 88-8 with the fol l owi nc► findings : Fl Adi.ngL Ur URE9141 — Qgnditional Use Pera1 i_No. 86-,5 1 . The proposed Taco Bell expansion plan will be compatible with adjacent prupertie's and uses because, pursuant to the ccnditions of approval , it will provide adequate parking.. anti:capsrig -and reduce circulattor, conflicts on-site. ?. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the Taco Bell Restaurant expansion will, not he' detrimental to the get;erai welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity and not detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. 3. Pursuant to the conditions of approval , on-site parking and circulA.tion for t.ie Taco Bell expansion 1s adequate and, does not have the potential of croatina a congestion or circulation h--xard. 4. Pursuant to the conditions of approval , ingress and egress to the Taco Bell s'te does not have the, potential of creating' additional traffic �,; impacts to the lntersectlor, along Pacific Coast Highway and Ninth St-,:et. 0 L - 3 __1 1 Page 2 - Statement o ction •• 5/1 /8(01 f S. The granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 88-57 for thr expansion of the Taco Bell Restaurant will not adversely affect the General P1dn of the City of Huntington Beach. 6. The location, site layout, and design of -the proposed Taco Bell expansion, pursuant to the conditions of approval , properly adapts the propnSed structure to the streets, driveways and other adJacent structures and uses in a harmonious manner. 7 . Pursuant to the conditions of approval , the combination and relationship of the existin�l Taco Bell Restaurant with the addition of the drive-thrt, window and lane on-site is properly i ntegrat,,L", 8. Pursuant to the conditions of approval , the j _cess to and parking for the proposed Taco Bell expansion does not create undue traffic because it provides adequate parking, on-site ci),cuiation and landscaping. Findq} gs for Rtiaroval �_ astal Qeyglggeent perks t ',IQ. --89-2 1 . The propos0 as reconuiended by staff is co:sistent with +-he goals and objectives zf the City's General Plan, Coastal Element and Scenic Highways Elements 2. The proposal as recommended by staff is consistent with the Huntington Beach Coastal Element and with Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act by providing a dri ve-thru restaurant facility for beach and public recreation accessibility. 8. The Taca Bell expansion as modified 4y staff' s proposal and as proposed by Coastal Development Permit No. 89-2 conforms with tNe plans , policies, requirements and standards of the HuntinDton Beach Coastal Element. 4, Coasti.1 Development Permit No. 89-2 as modified by staff is consistent with 'the zoning designation of the Downtown Specific Plan-District One. 5. Coastal Development Permit No. 89-2 at the time of completion will provide infrastructure in a manner that- is consistent with C-LUP by providing a drive-thru window to an exiting restaurant. Findings for Ugniai -- t;2nditIRDA] KaMance) No. 8R 1: 1 . There are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the lano, buildings or promises involved that do not apply generally to other property or uses ire the district. 2. The ranting of a conditional exception for reduced landscaping requ�rwnt is not necessary in order to preserve' the enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights. 3. The gratrtii g of Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 89-1 for reduced 1 andscapi , . requi rowent will be aateriai ly detrimntal to the Public i health, s et -arid welfare, or injurious to the conforming Oand, pr ett)r o- ioprovewta) In the not Oftrkod. 4. The :,:odditlanal exceptlon (variance) for reduced laodsc ping roauirewent' ix not consistent with tht goals and objeetivas of the City' s General x, Plan astd Land Use Mp� designation of, ,'!si tor-5arv1 ng Ccraawrrcial . a :�'11"�Wi�i�Mi.`a�'1}t�.a. rr 4ti�$'�ri.LSIt�,r9i�,S.iln►ij{' 1r:'.7!��.Ai�.i'! iS' .i " , - --- � ,_.. �....� . �0 t I Page 3 - Statoment o �tion - 5/ l /B9 S. The f1pranting of this conditional exception from Section 9608(c) if the IluntIngton Beach Ordinance Codz will defeat the general purposes or Intent of the code which is to provide landscaping along public ri ght-uf•-ways . Findings far Dernial - SpkaJ J_Ug E_ i_�fl. @A--I: 1 , Strict compliance with Article 961 and the Downtown Design Guidelines will net result in a substantial economic hardship to the applicant, 2, the proposed freestanding pole sign will adversely affect other signs in the area. 3. The proposed freestanding pole sign will be detrimental to property located in the vicinity of such sign; and will not be Compatible with the surrounding area . i 4. The proposed freestanding pole sign located at the intersection Df Ninth Street and Pacific Coast {ii ghway will obstruct peO+ :-tri an or ven ,nul ar traffic vision. Conditions of ARREOval 1 . The site plan, Alternative "B" as modified by Planning Commission (See Alternative B, Attachment 4 of the Request for City Council Action Report dated May 1 , 1989) and further modified by the City Council to delete any ingress/sgresa to the alley, shall he the conceptually approved layout. 2 . Prior to submittal for building permits, the applicant/cwner shall complete the following: A. Elevations shall r; . : ct colors and building materials as approved by the Design Review hoard. b. If outdoor lighting is included, high-pressure sodium vapor lamps or similar energy savings lamps shall be used. All outside lighting ahal1 be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties and shall be noted on the site plan and elevations. c. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer. This analysito shall include on-sits soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading, chemical and fill properties , foundations, retaining walls, streets. and utilities . d. The Design Review Board shall review and approve the following: (a) Proposed structures shall be architecturally compatible with Witting structure,. (b) Revised site plan and elevations as modified pursuant to lid fit) Al') signage as proposed. Jd) Landscaping plan. 1 A 11 i A SO".. 1 L 1 IX J, Page 4 - Statement o, .ction - 5/1 /89 e. The site plan shall include (or reference page) all conditions of ' approval imposed on the project printed verbatim. 3. P-ior to issuance of building pe nits , the applicant/owner shall ccmple4 the following: a. Sufmit copy of the reviled site plan, floor plans and elevations pursuant to Condition Ao. 1 for review and approval and inclusion in the entitlement file. b. A Landscape Construction Sit must be submitted to the Departments of Ca mnity Development and Public. Works and must be approved by the Design Review 8oand, The Landscape Construction Set shall include a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State Licensed Landscape Architect and which includes all propo.e.itexisting plant materials (location, type, size, quantity') , an irrigation plan, a grading plan, &a approved site plan, and a copy of the entitlement conditions of approval . The landscape plans shall be in conformance with Section 9608 of the Huntington (leach Ordinance Code. The set must be approved by both departments prior, to issuance of bui1dinr nermiis . � Palm trees shall be clustered ane vary in size and species to i ncl ude the Mediterranean Fan Palm; minimum tree height shall be ten feet . c. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid . d. An irrevocable reciprocal driveway and parking easement between the subject site and adjacent parcel shall be submitted. A copy of the legal instrument shall be approved by the Community Development Department and tha City Attorney as to form, and content and , when approved, shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder. A copy shall be filet+ with the department of Community Development. Said instrument shall be valid for the lime of the restaurant use with the drive-thru lane. e. Provide written evidence that the applicant has negotiated a date of rewyal of the existing billboard. f. The applicant shall suhmlt an alternative non-audible speaker system for review and approval by the Community Development D2 drtmen t- g. All rooftop mechanical equipment on existing and new parts of the building$ shall be snreened from three-story views to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. Said screening shale be architecturally compatible with the Building in terms of materials and colors. If screening is not designed specifically into the Wilding, a separate rooftop oechanical equipment plan must be submitted showing screening and must be approved . 4. The Public Works Departmant requirements are as follows: a. Claw the existing drive approaches along Pacific Coast Highway to Public, Works standards. b. Submit a revised I Ia►n to be reviewed by the Public Works Department to include the i`oiow!ng: Page 5 - Statement r. iction - 5/l /89 (1 ) A 2 fxit-6 inch alley dedication is required as determined by the Pi;bllc Works Department. (2) Sit.•• Idalk improvements are, required along Pacific Coast Highway. (3) A 27 foot minimum radius type driveway is required at the Ninth Street drive entrance. (4) Remove and reconstruct the entire alley adjacent to the rear Taco Bell property 1,ine to the satisfaction of the Public Wcrks Department. (5) A gradir; Plsr, shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. (6) Construction of street lights are deemed required by the Public " Norks Department. 6. Fire Department Requirements are as follows : a. The appl + nant shall meet all applicable locai , State and Federal Piro Codes , Ordinances , and standards . b. Black wall along south property line (hotel ) must be 6 foot above grad,: of oil pad and oil tanks. c . Screen wall must be 6 feet above grade for oil well adjacent to the pa vk!ng area.. d. F loci; wall separating trash bin and the oil tank anus t be minimum 6 'feet high . 6. The development r' all, comply with all applicable provisions of the 0�di nance Code, Building Division, and Fire department. 7. nil building spoils , such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe , &no other surplus or unusable material , shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle there. 8. Construction; shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7:Cn AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holirays . q. The, haunt of operation shal 1 be i imi ted to between: I 7:00 AN to 10:00 iH Monday thru Thursday (ant! 1 12:(+.1 Mt dnight tram May to September) 7:00 AM to 12:00 Midnight Friday 00111 s :00 AN from may to Septemb r) 8:00 M to 12:00 Midnight Saturday Omtl1 1 :00 AM from I%Y to September) 8:00 AM to 10:00 PH Sunday `until 12:00 MUM ht � t M Y to sopta r �1!►'7,.r. ...-. ....,..,.- - -y---___ .� �-„-., . , ,..., ., --._...._......_._� - coin. R , Page 6 - Statement c Iction - 5l1 ;s9 io. The proposed menu ordering system shall be non-ardible. 11 . An hourly trash monitoring system to survey the site and adjacent properties shall be implemented. 12. Install "No loitering" signs and "Excessive Noise Including Loud Music Is Prohibitnd" signs throughout the parking area to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department. 13. prior to final building psrwit approval for the drive-thru addition , the following shall be completed: a. The wJor identification sign shall be removed and replaced with a raximua: 7 root high monument sign with maximum 33 square feet of sign area. b. All improvements (including landscaping) to the property shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans a!,d conditions of approval Specified herein. c. The billboard shall be remcvAd. d. Compliance with all conditions ►if approval specified herein shall be accomplished. 14. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke this conditional use permit if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beath Ordinance Code occurs . 15. TOs conditional use permit shall not become effective for any purpose until an "Acceptance rf Conditions" form has been properly executed by the applicant and an authorized representative of the owner of the property, ar d returned to the Planning Division ; and until the ten day appeal period has elapsed, 16. A review of the use shall be conducted within one (1 ) year to verify compliance with all conditions of approval and applicable Articles of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 17. This conditional use permit shall became null and void unless exercised within one (1 ) year of the date of final approval , or such extens;on of time as may be granted by the Planning Commission pursuant to a written request suW,tted tiu the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration ditto. Tw• notion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: McAllister, Green, Ninchell , Bannister, Mays , Silva VM: Erskine -� ABSENT: None �i�I�AiIAAii4�tA�Ar1A�Mi#iblliiiA�i�4�A*RA*Aiii.'fi�lifii!iiiiiAl *iiariAA�eiill+Ai+��1*Ai��r1/1A -J V t Page 7 - StdiOIJOnt c +ction S/1 /89 ADJw 11 fK -WWI L/REBEYELOPHOILAMCL The Mayor/Chairman adjourned the regular meeting of the City Council and the regular meeting of tho Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach to 5:30 a.m. , Monday, May 15, 1989, in Room 8- 8, of the Civic C6nter Complex. ATTEST: Connie 'rockwAy _ City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California Con!F.�cQdmjt...._.._ City Clerk I ' STATE OF CAI IFORNIA ) Nou- BaIlDis County of Orange ) Mayor City of Huntington Beach) 10 CONNIE BROCKWAY, the duly elected and qualified City Clerk of the � City of Huntington Beach, California, do hereby Certify that the above and , foregoing is a true and correct Statement of Action of the City Council of said � City at their ;equ7 ar meeting held on the 1st day of May 1989. ; HITMESS my hand and seal of the laid City of Huntington Beach this the 3rd day of May 1989. _ Calf p- ImAw City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, Californid Deputy I' l CITY OF HUNTINGTON LAEACH e ja 200D MAIN STREET Op.LI F 0 R N I A 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERIC NOTICE OF ACTION COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO •.Z APPEAUBLE DEVELOPMENT Applicant: _�i .herd -L..Armtrs 2964 .4C UL_3jyd. .Suite._G___ Oceanside, CA. 92054 Request : -.h_ r-mi t -th ' exp.,, s i oa of n e x i.5 30 lacu Be" ] rag ----- by adding a drive--thru window with a variance request for parking and landscaping. The request also includes the remodel of a non-conforming freestanding pole sign. Location: 1'aco Bell , 818 Pacific Coast Highway (Northeast corner of Pacific Coast Highway and 9th Street) Date of Approva 1: May It 1989 _^ Your appl�Fay atiot was acted upon by the Huntington Beach City Council on 1 , 1989 and your request was: Approved Conditionally approved ( see attached) Denied Withdrawn � i Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach ordinance Code# the �I action taken by the City Council is final. � Arproval of this de,/elopment is appc,l able to the Coastal Commission � Pursuant to P'AC •S. 30603 . A denial may be appealed (3 . 13319, Title 14 , C&1196&'nl ► hlainistrative Cedar only if the City ban approved a dovdl`ppwt�t on the. #oasis of 106al land use regulations but has denied the' astiva►.:�sa ''if a coastal development permit becmuse it cannot make 1 the 91ad;ri#s ' requii!ed. by Section 13311 , Tile 14 of the CaliforniaJ 04rilairatirre Coda . r Row- b>. adAj lion, in an effort to minimize revise from the speaker system, the project has been con4iticzied (Conlitlons N 3f , 91 ?.d) to provide an alternatives speaker isyatom, 11mit the hours of operation, and require the manu ordering system he non-audible after A : 00 p.m. The potential noise generated from the proposed drive--thru lane and the existing traffic: onri,te has been addressed by the modified clt(s plan. The proposed location of the drive-•thru lane in away froin the exiatirng apartment building and its designci ' to direct traffic out onto Ninth Street . Tl,e axistiny 15 foot wide allele, located to tho rear of the existing Taco Bell site, separates the restaurant from the apartment building to than north. The applicant will dedicate 2 and 1/2 feet from his side of the alley to increase the width of the alley to 17 and 1/2 � feet . In addition, the project has been conditioned to provide an additional 2 and 1f2 feet of paved area to increase the overall width to 20 feet to meet: current alley width standards . It will also result in an increased maneuvering area for a.—case into the garages on the opposite alley side . The physical condition of the alley is poor . The conditional use permit requirement is to improve 50 percent of the alley adjoining the subject property. If the Ci;;y Council upholds the Planning Commissions ' s approval of the project , staff recommends that the entire alley adjacent to the Taco sell site be rawoved and replaced to the satisfaction of the Public Workr Department . The site ' s design has also provided are ingress only lane accessible from the OV intersection of the alley sy-l- em. The Planning Commissiou ' s approved modifir-A site plan provides efficient on- site circulatic,n and provides the necessary code required parking which will minimire alley usages and direct -traffic onto Ninth SL-raet . The project upgrades the existing restaurant site . Tne project will provide additional landscaping, new monument sign, removal of a billboard, and Vh-& resurfacing and rastriping of the parking arsa . This will correct *he nonconforming site conditions as noted by the appellant . Also, the problem associated with trash will be reduced with the recrammendation that a hourly trash monitzrinq system be implemented and a yearly review of the projocF be conducted by the Planning Commission to ensure compliance with all conditions of approval . Aix P11t ' As noted by the appellant the State of California in consiferinq ewasasures to rWuco the 10pac:ts of air pollution . The 1980 Air Nality NanaVoWnt District Plan hen been approved by the Southern California Air Quality Management District and discusses control nett s WhiCh includes p;rar.lusion of drive-thrun or require dual window SyRtOW . At this time, the City of Hurtington Beach has not 044raed the Air Qualit* mnagemat District 's plan. ,�M 'ir • f ,• 4. The rop0eed project is exempt from CYt�a� 1 , Saction 15301 , from the prom sions cif the California Environmental Quality Act . MCB s blot applicable . A&M=zWLMP 6. The City Council may approve the appeal by denying conditional Use Permit No. 88-57 and Coastal Uevelopmont Permit No . 89-2 with findings . F f F F 1 . Area map 3 . Appoal latter (Erskine) date: Marc:a 31 , 1989 3 . Appeal letter (Thompson/KimbAll) dated March 31, 1989 4 . Planning Commission approved skte plan 5 . Planning ComeJssion Vindingm and Conditions of Approval 6 . Staff report O.At d March xl, 1989 7 . Staff report crates February 22, 1989 IrtA1:Iil�: �s A. h' . 7Y : * • lrt.*�4 • ' of tMCZ f S `f :� �`- ��..• � -ter► � II� � U I IN l c ' } : ITY F H U NTI NGT BEACH pi CITE' COUNCIL COMMUNICATIaM � o . cowile Drockwayo FROM Y+ol.'t Erskin T� City Cleric Councilman SUBJECT FOR APPk"AL DATE March 29, 1989 I ` Iroquat ftt do P14u.nWg Comminicn action on March 21, 1989, (Taco Bell vtp W)ndow request) be appealed to the City Council for further etwsideration, My a:t* c ancern with the project it the minimal amount of revitaliaatioc being p ed with the expetwJed use. The project location is adjacent to the City's downtown Ro&welopment efforts and therefore warrents special ant~ careful review to architectuml detail to aaaure compatabillty. ,tE:I�tA:t►.e w � WilliC! fi ' ?6 � ''1 rhd Y A ! �•� i ',�41'•yy, 9 •,•,4 Y�AY�1.1�1 f' f x' �Ar.'S'•' ..I r :� Y . h.Y 'F., �' i I '. s: a1�Y S �c:A1'�b��l ,i�.r skfi le ��iL� ��tlP�rr�AP_'I, r , F d •� a1�aCt�1►t# NEW ClITTY �4iAtt CITE Oft HU4tlhGTMH ArAM CALIF. 28025 -X ShyPark Bast MAI 31 3 u? pH '6 J lakviXO, CaliZorniA *2714 KOXOh 31, 1969 City Co1urnai l City of MmUnvton Beach 2000 main street Suntington foaaach, Califirmia 92548 Dear Aayor snd Uounoil Pe,oplaa r 1% March 13, 19S%# the Planning CoUnissiou approved,. over the oh 4ations .of the neighborhood residents, a drive through for the e# stf nq Taco Hall restaurant at the corner of 9 th and PM. QAi`ortunartely this project to detriaoutal to the public saw<fpty anO health and injurious to tits conforming improvements in, the mmigbborhood. There are seever'%1 issues that support this conclusion. Iffilfist There are two sourae s of noise :,bait affect the neighboring proportion. first that applicant ban been approved Car an audible ordering syst,aamo fnfortunately that noise frog these systems spill evoc that property line to the adjoining residences and affect their glut enjoyment of the property. Nobody wants to b►mw saw 1 have your order please?0 too tines a day and wither v ing up or goinq to slr"p tea the words taco, btuarri+�o or tostada. Of cosu rsare# a non nudlblo syntax would have been acceptable but this causer not required. second, this is a very sa tll site being a total of only approximately 2Q p O JO of. T'be assarouiatad seine of the restaurant coupled with the added noise frog the drive through will adversely affect the comfort aaund enjoyment of that n*ighboring residentset. These Aoises rrre, but not liaitod to, oar borax, squealing tires, loud radios, voices, eta* Over tle years, we have put up with these not seen but the drive, through will magnify these to at unacceptable level. Is TU alloys a &** not desigmed for high intonsity ooanaaaaeraiaa►l tra rtia. Thor were deasi 44 for lax iAt+snsity ingress and agressa to p090108 90saa►ves* ft too almost iaaaapossibie for two tray traaa►t;iQ to take pYmoe In the alloy becau so of tho narrowness. none mans lid ham to pals Ovor to the right and ,atop in order for U40fto to paa�asaa. ftet Ineroassd us* of the alloy to particularly don"Ve ar to this situation where you have garages abutting the l00w � iidf�� out of their �� directly into Me r�l! of drivrfib . nlnq into � . • •";,' ry r'1 ���.,a ...,rea .wrJ... .',r�i•.e�i4u„i^. ... ,. .:i.. r Phi.• , 1 4�"' 00" mayor and Cou:eail Peopla city of huntiawton Beach Kara% 311 1981 Page 2WO out of 'taco bell from the allay will aeoessitate crossix q over Into the opposing traffic lane as well an the privately owned drive apron of the apartments directly bobin4 the Taco bell. All of tbese situatAons will lead to increased accidents and harm to the residents. The state of California has just reported that drive through restaurant faoiilties are a major source of pollution. This is due to all the oars idling is line and spewing out pollutants to the detriment of the noighbarhryod residazts. The state may aovo to ]. t those operations. 2ND,.MICIMOIR -t Taco Bell has been a ■ouxoe of visual blight Zor years. Trash from thO facility aoastauxky finds its way to neighboring properties. Only in the last couple of weeks while the applicant has been seeking plans.tag commission approval has the situation improved at all. sowevero the applicants true statemont of its roll in being a good neighbor can be evidenced by the ezterior condition 99 the property. The parking lot is cracked and in need of major slurry work# the landscaping is atrocious, the exterior metal is in need of maintsmance, eta, By permitting the drive through the Plauning commission has extended the life of Taco boll aaothor fS years. Yet there are so Improvemonts r tire4 on Sth Atroot and only ainor work rmpi,red in the allay. Taco 8e11 adds nothing , the neighborhood and it will continue to be a blight for another 25 pears. This is hardly in keeping vitb the re4evslopcen't currently taxing place in the downtown area Who betters► line is that this project does not work. It is Getrinestal to the public safetyl, hoalth and is injurious to the conforming iwprovaaents of the neighborhood. We respectfully repeat that you dozy the drive through of Taco sell. ilftea a y sours, d'w iilabael Tb �1on Scott diM"ll ai as { : 1 mow �x .�rU"__2Q"TA . ....&MONDTIaNAI� � i. �E `SIT No, $R--'31 1 . The proposed Taco Bell. expansion will be compatible with adjacent properties and uses benause, as modified by staff ' s propusel , will proviue adequate parking, landscaping and reduce circulation, conflicts c.n-sitc . a . The establishment , maintenance and operation of the Taco Bell Restaurant expansion will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity and not detrimwntAl to the value of the property and improvements in the neighoorhood . 3 . On-site parking and circulation as modified by staff ' s proposal fOL the Taco Bell expansion ie adequate and does not have t4to potential of cresting a congestion or circulation hazard . 4 . Xngress and agrees to the Taco Bell site as modified by staff ' s proposal. does not have the potential of creating additional tratfi.c im;,,cts to the intersection along pacific Coast Highway and Ninth Street . 5 . The granting of ConL-Ational Use Permit No . 88-57 for the � expansion of the Taco Ball Restaurant mill not adversely akfect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach . 6 . The location, site layout , and design of the proposed 'S.1&%;o Bell expansion as modified by staff ' s proposal properly adapts the proposed stiucture to the streets , driveways and other adjacent structurej and uses in a harmonious manner. 7 . The combination and relationship of the existing Taco Bell iteutsurant with the addition of the drive-thru window and lane as modified by staff ' s proposal on-site is properly integrated . 8 . The assess to and parking for the proposed Taco Bell expansion so modified by staff ' s proposal does not create undue traffic because it provides adequate parking, on-Bits circulation and landscaping. I . The proposal as recotomnded by staff is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City 's General Plan, Coastal glment and scenic Mighways Elements. 1. The proposal as recoracarnded by staff is consistent with the Huntington Beach Coastal Blunt and with Cbaptoir 3 of the Wifornis Coastal Act by providing a drive-tbru restaurant facilitl► for beech and public recreation accessibility. rol � 3. The Taco dell a Tponsion as modified by- staff ' s proposal and as proposed by Coastal Development Kermit No . 89-2 Conforms with the plans, policies , requirements and standards of the Huntington Beach Coastal Element . 4 . Coastal Development permit No , 89-2 as modified by staff is consistent r�;' th the zoning Gaaignation of the Downtown Specific plan-Distri.cL one . 5 . Coastal Development Permit No . 89•-2 at the time of completion will provide infrastructure in a manner that is consistent with C-LUP by providing a drive-thru window to an exiting restaurant . FORINCS FOR MENIAL - COISOMOM CrAMS ..LYARI1ANCE1 NO . @5�1: 1 . There are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the land, buildings or premises involved that do not apply generally to other property or uses in the district . 2 . They granting of a conditional ezreption for reduced landscaping requirement is not necessary in order to preserve t4e enjoyment of ones or more substantial property rights. 3 . The granting of Conditional Exception (Variance) No . 89 -1 for reduced landscaping requirement will be materially detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, or injurious to the conforming ( land, property, or improvements) in they neighborhood . 4 . The conditional excoption (variance) for reduced landscaping requirement is not consistent with the goals and objectives of the City' s General Flan and land Use Map designation of Visitor-Serving Commercial . 5 . The granting of this conditional exception from Section 9608 (c) of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code will. defeat the general purposes or intent of the code which is to provide landscaping along public right-of-ways . FINUINral iQ& 13ZK1At. �'�Iblc 519N PKRUT 1J1�. fl g w 8 1 . Strict compliance with Article )61 and the Downtown Design Guidelines will no'; result in a substantial economic hardship to the applicant . 1. The proposed freestanding poles sign will adversely affect other signs in the area . 3 . The proposed freestanding pole sign will be detrimental to property located in the vicinity of such sign; and will not be ce atibler with the surrounding area. 41 The $reposed t�roostanding pole sign locator i ut the intersectionof Sintb ptrewat and Pscific Coast Highway will obstruct V"estrlern or vehicular traffic vision. Lf•bf 0 ; q e 1' • `, i h•ll'�a YW Y � , dMMb 1 . The ante plan, Alternative 000 as modified by Plairning Comissi.on providing ingress alley ,.cress only, shall be the concep+tuolly approved layout (see attached map) . 2. Prior to sutaittal for building parr.:lts , the applicant/owner shall vompl"tee the following : a . Slesvations shall depict colors hnc building materials proposed . b. If outdoor lighting is included , high-pressure sodium vapor lamps or similar energy savings lamps shall be used. All outside lighting shall be directed to preveen� "spillage" ontn adjacent properties and shall be noted on the site plan and zlevations . c. A detailed soils analysis sha:.1 be prepared by a registered Eoi .le Zn9inee3r . This analysis shall include on-site soil sampling and laboratory testing of idateeri als to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading , chemical and fill propertie3s# f:1undations , retaining walla , streeeeta , and utilities . i d. The Deign Review Board shall review and approve the following: (a) Proposed structures shall be architecturally compatible with existing structure . (b) Revised site plan and elevations as modified puromant. to Condition no. 1. (c) All signage as proposed . (d) Landscaping plan.. a.. The site plan shall include (or reference page) all conditions of approval imposed on the project printed verbatim. 3 . prior to issuances of building permits, the applicant/ownehr shall Complete the following : a . Submit Copy of the revised site plan, flour plans and elevations pursuant to Condition ito. I for review and approval and inclusion In the entitlement file. b. X Landscape Construction Stet must be submitteed to the Departments of Cosmrt:aity Development and Public Works and must be approved . The Landscape Construction Set shall 144tudee a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State Li cents" Landscape architoct and which inc ludeea a l 1 60 e• , _ 1 1i 'Id S. r r ' proposed/existing pipet materials ( Location, type, size, quantity) , an irrigation plan, a► grading plan, an akprcved site plan, and a copy of the entitlement conditions of appro,ral . The landscape plans shall be in conformance with Section. 9608 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code . The set must be approved by both departments prior to issuance of building permits . c . All applicable Public Works fees shall he paid . d . An irrevocable reciprocal. driveway and parking easement between the subject site and adjacent parcel shall be submitted . A copy of the :legal instrument shall be approved by the Community Development Department and the F City Attoraey as to form and content and, when approved, shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder . A copy sha 1), be f.i 7 ad with the Department of Community Development . Said inetrume nt shall be valid for the life f of the restaurant use with the drive-thru lane . e . Provides written evidence that the applicant has ,negotiated a date of removal of th . existing billboard . f . The applicant shall submit 3n alternativo speaker system for approval by staff . g . All rooftop mechanical equipment on existing and new parts of the building shall be screened from three-story views to the satisfaction of they Community Development Director . Said slscreftning shall be architecturally compatible with the building in terms of materials and colors . If screening is not designed specifically into the building, a separate rooftop mechanical equipment plan must be submitted showing screening and must be approved . 4 . The Public Works Department requirements a : a an follows : a . Close the existing drive approaches alonq Pacific Coast Highway to Public Works standards. b. ,Submit a revised plan to be reviewed by the Public Works Department to includle the following: ( 1) A Z foot-6 inch alley dedication is required as determined by the Public Works Department. (1) Sidewalk laprovementss are required along pacific Coast Highway. (3) A 27 foot minimum radius type driveway is required at the Ninth Street drive entrance . (4) Imptovs the alley (to the center line of the allay) adjacent to the subject property as doomed necessary by Public Mcks Department. Nils (2409d) i trAt 1 (S) A 0rading p12n xhall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Degartment . 5 , Fire Department Requirements are as follows : a . The applicant shell meat all applicable local , State and Federal Fire Codes, ordinances, and stan0rds . b. Block wall along south property line (hotel ) mutt be 6 font above grade of uil pad and coil tanks . C. Screen wall must be 6 feet above grade for oil well adiaceat to the parking area. d. Black wall separating trash biro and the oil tank must be minimum 6 feet high . 6 . The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code# Building Vivioion, and Fire Vepartm ent. 7 . All building spoils, Such as unusable lumber, wire, piper and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an Off--Rite facility equipped to handle them. S . Construction shall be limited to Monday -- Saturday 7 : 00 AM to 8:00 PH. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. 9 . The hours of ':►aeration shall be limited to between : 10: 0D AN to 10:00 ISM Sunday thru Thursday (10: 00 AM to 12: 00 Midnight from May to September) 10: 00 AN to 17 Midnight Friday and Saturday (1.0: 00 An to 1: 00 AM f rant May to September) 10 . The proposed menu orderinq system shall be non.-audible efter S:UO PX. 11 . Wor to final building permit approval for the drive-thru addition►, the following shall be co•npleted: a. Tho major Identification, sign shall be removed and replaced with a maximum 7 foot high monument sign with maai..ium 33 Sqe«re feet of sign area. b. All improvements (iucluding landscaping) to the property shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans and conditions of approval specified herein. c. The billboard shall be removed. d. C+ lirnce with all conditions of approval specified heroin ':::, sball be acCso"11 ab0« a, ' a Via'•:y: 11 . The planning Corwuisei,on ress ves the right to revoke this conditional use permit if any violation of these conditions or the Muntiogton beach Ordinance Code occurs . 13 . This conditional use permit shall not become efieCCi've for -+ny purpose until. an "Acceptance of Conditions" form has been properly oxecuted by the applicant and an authorized representativ►+o of the owner of the property, and returned to the planning Division; and until the ter clay appeal period has elapsed. 14 . A review of the use shall be wondue:ted, within one ( 1) year to verity compliance with all conditions of rappr-ova ' and sppl,icable Articles of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 15 . This roradi.tional use permit shall become null and void unlass exercised within one ( 1 ) year of the date of C inal approval,, or such extension of time as may be granted by the Planning Commission pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a mininom 30 days prior to the expiration dame. (24044) l 40 rountInghan bench dopertmen . of community devw iprment Y SrAf REPOR M� , TO ,r planning Commission FROM: Community Development DATE: Xar6h 211 1989 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USF PERMIT NO , 88--57/C:ONDrTIOt1AL EXCEPTI )N ('VARTANCr,) NO . 59-1,/(;0r%,1-,T L DFIVETiOPMENT PE"ITT NO. a9 -2/SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT NO . 88--8 (CONTINUED FROM Tv f, FEBRUARY 22 , 1989 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING) I APPLICANT: Richard Be Armstrong 1851-B W. Vista Way Suite 262 Vista, California 92083 REQUEST : To permit the expansion of an existing Taco Bell restaurant by adding a drive thru window with a variance request for parking and landscaping . The regaest also includes the remodel of a neinconformirg freestanding pale sign . LOCATION: 828 Pacific Cast Hiyhwaj (northeast corner of hac: fic Coast Highway and Ninth Street) JAL. fiMGEJjJETJ� A. Approve Conditional Use Pe mit No . 86-57 and Coastal Development hermit No . 89-2 for Alternative B, as modifie3 ;y staff with findings and conditionE of approval , and deny Conditional Exception (Variance) No . 89-1 with findings . � Be Approve Special Sign Permit No. 88-81 as modified by staff, with findings and conditions of tpproval . z 4 So ENE I INFO MA I Conditional Urge Permit No . 88-57, Conditional Exception .(Variance No. 89-1 and Coastal Development Permit No. 89-2 are requested to � expand the existing 1, 627 square foot Taco Bell Restaurant by add nq a 150 square foot drive-thru window and expanding the parking ar,t° onto an adjacent 50 Boot wide lot with a variance request for reduced parking and landscaping ,requirements . The restaurant is nonconf3rming because of the structures ' reduced setback along Ninth Street; thus any expansion requires spproval by the Planning Commission. lyr *46 JIM �1' H •• J ��ll i *i' 44,,'.r,,y• }; M 1 1 r ;GEC -, 4"CL I Sip Pormit No . 38-8 is a request to modify the existing rith -agarMIA9 1 foot hi h "' 9 Dale sign bx rt�placinQ the ezieting ai.gn +a :33 square foot rectangular sign . The variance is requr4ted baCaUse the tModi.fiod sign exceeds the height and size requirements of the Dormtoom Design Guidelines (maximum height is 6 feet send maxims acre* is 15 square foot) . the application was wontinued from the February 22 , 1989 Planning Comi.ssion meatirig in an eaffurt to allo!i sufficient time for staff Mnd the applicant to resolve the Planning Commission ' s concerns r*gasding the closure of the Pacific Coast Highway drive approach, tho drive-thru speaker system, trash and the use of the al'ey. In 41tion, they applicant pieseated a new plan (Att:achrnent No . 1) at the meeting which had not been analyzed by staff and the Planning Commission. 3 - a 196135 AND ANAL YBS-6 ggs.taurant Xzpar naion The following is a zoning conformance matrix which compares the re visid proposed x tojeCt as surmittad by the applicant at the February 221 1999 Planning Commission maetinc, with the appli oabl-a development standards of the Downtown Speolfic Plan, District One , and Article 960 , Parking and Landscaping : aluctign emue F3QWX2d r_ sus 4 . 3 . 07(b) Sideyard Ss t:back 20% of lot 2 ft . existing (DTEP# l) frontage : not (Ninth St . } leas than ]. ft . 9603 6Go Parking 9 ft . x 19 ft . , 9 ft , x 19 ft . , 20 ft . rli ;Ie 20 ft . aisle width width 9605(e) Drive-thru 1 space per 5 spa(.es stacking credit 23 lineal f t . (138 divided by 23 = 6) 9606F(i) Restaurant 1 space per 60 2's spaces parking gross sq . ft , plus 6 stacking (1, 730 divieed credit , total by 60 = 28 29 spaces spscos) 9608(c) front and side 10 f t . wide 3 f t . (PCB€) ** pert! landscaping Isndscapa berm 2 ft . (ninth St . ) * * Nxiatinq nonconforming rt� Conditional Exce9tion (Variance) request 2tefi Smart - 3/21/89 -2- (2239d) y, �wr The revised plans have ali.mi.nated the variances for aisle width and packing ,by reducing the drive-th:u window by 44 square feet and by providing code required back-up area for 30 degree angle parking . The variance request for landscaping along Pacific Coast Highw.,y and the variance for tnij sign have not been changed of addressed . Yjillic le Circlilation : The mPplicarti s revised Plans (Attachment #1) as submitted docs not adequately address the concerns that were outlinerl in staff ' s Planning Commission repurw dated February 22 , 1989 (Attachment #5 ) . There are still severed concerns ralativo to the Proposed d;: i.vc-thru lone, access to all parking spaces , the driveway on Pacific Coast Highway, the internal on-site circulation, ingress and egress to the drive lane from Ninth Stre 3t and the chive-thru loop d+hich can be entered frow the alley to the rear Staff hill several meetings with the applicant in an effort. to address t:hQ_ c-oncerns raised at the February 21 , 1989 011k,innina Coiumiasion meeting . The concerns discussed were; the closure of the driveway along Pacific Coast Highway, noise from the speaker :,.:.-tern, trash, and access to the alley . Two new alternative site plans were analyzed : AIITE:RI.I�'I�IVE__+�: This layout (Attachment: No . 2) is the applicant ' s second revised request ;, ith a one-way exit only driveway to Pacific Coast Highway any' one-way entry from the alley. A two-wal- drive on PaciL ic coast Highway was analyzed but resulted 3n a shortened drive-t'aru lane with the potential fo - vehicles stacking out Into Pacific Coast Highway,. A one-way drive entry was reviewed; it was detemined that it would not facilitate the drive:--thr.0 lane and also hNG the potential for vehicles stacking out onto Pacific Coast Highway due to vehicles maneuvering in and out of the can-;site parking !spaces. One-way drive emit was the most feasible and offered an alternative exit from the site onto Pacific roast- Highway. Also , an additional 2-1/2 feet: of the subject property will be � paved resulting in a 20 foot wide paved alleyway to facilitate batter traffic flow since a 2-1/2 foot alley dedication has not occurred on the ether side. ;1 ALTERNATIV'P'_U: V%is alternative (Attachment Mo . 3) represents minor artendnents to the original staff recommendation with no driveway acc,&ss onto Pacific Coast Highway and reduced driveway Sri 9th (20 feet) to the alley. The benefits of this layout are similar to those outlined in the original, staff report ; more efficient cn-sitn ci.rculationp provides adequate on-site , parking, and meets code required landataping widths and area . This layout also ixicludes an additional 2-1/2 foot paved alley area . t. r Staff Wort -- 31 21/89 -3- (2239d) y j With regards to the variance request for front yard landscapinq , the epplicsmt is proposing (Attachment No. 1) a three (3) foot landscaped planter along Pacific Coast Highway (front) and no n3w landscaping *long Ninth Street (exterior) of the nubject property. Novo landscaping is proposed to accentuate the drive--thru Lane to the roar of the property. Coda requires a ten ( l.d) foot landscaped berm Qbang the f vont and side of property adjacent to the public right-ol-way. The applioant ' s revised proposal. (Attachment No • 2) ad3s:eZaes the concerns of the code requi;;ed landscaping along Pacific Coast Hi.gh+welr and eliminates the variance request for landscaping. This proposal substantially complies with the intent of the landscaping corridor al:oag Pacific Coast Highway. As proposed in staffs al.ternatJve (Attachment No. 31 , the landscaping is provided along Pay_-!ific Coast Highway as required by code and reflects the landscaping corridor image developing along the Pacific; Coast Highway sf-e:..stscape. The following is a mining conformance matrix which compares the proposed F ign as discussed in the Planning Commission t�eport dated Fenruary 22 , 1989 (Attachment No. 5) , with the applicable development standards of the Downtown Design Guidelines 1 ' 1AXUA Revue red Proposed, Downtown Freestandinq sign Design --aiae 15 sq . ft . 33 sq . ft . * Guidelines -Height 6 ft . high, 15 it . high monument typa existing pole sign* * Special Sign Permit request In staff • s met.'.ngs with the applicant, it was proposed that the sign be allowed as proposed by the applicant on a two-year temporary basics or until pacific Coast Highway is restriped to a six lane thoroughfare. Thim proposal is basically a limited sign permit r,aquest. After the two year period his expired the applicant shall xestove the pole sign and replace it with the staff proposed monument sign an proposed in the Planning Commission staff report (Attachment No. 5) . f Y; Staff **port - 3/21/89 (2239d) 77 Anotber issue that is of concern is the billboard ldoated along the easterly property line at pacific Coast Highway. Section 41 31isual of the Coastal Element states * "63gne which do not dispplay Afornation related to an activity, service or commodity evailable on the premises will be prohibited . This would act to exclude billboords . " In addition, Section 9 . 5 . 3 of the Coastal Element policies states : "prohibit now billboards within the coastal zone. " Also, the Scenic Highway' s 81deent staters that the Citlr is trying to remove billboards along pacific Coast Highway and thereby qualify the Mowey to be included in the State Scenic Highway System. Therefore, staff recommends that the applicent negotiate the removal of the billboard with the billboard company and submit a letter indicating such attempts and date of removal prior to the issuance of building permits . Lot Qns rde ion I Since the property to the east will be used to provide required parking for the restaurant, a legal instrument, approved as to form Ly the City Attorney, must be submitted prior to the i.s suanc: of building permits which ties together the properties . This instrument will insure that the properties shall be head together as one an long as the restaurant use exists with a drive-thru lane on the subject property and adequate parking is provided . NgJ I& r.lrn....yact= With ragarde to the noise from the proporsed speaker system each staff alternative depicts a relocated menu board. adjscent to the restaurant assay from the apartment residents to the north . The current hours of operation of the restaurant are Monday through Thursday and Sunday from 10 : 00 AM to 10 : 00 PM, Friday and Saturday from 10:00 Alf to 12 :00 Midnight . Staff is recommending that the hours of pGration remain constant and that the memo board ordering system be non -audible after 8 : 00 FN. Addreaei,.v the Planning Commission` s: concers regarding the potential trash problems . Staff is recommending that trash receptacles be ShOM an the ptopoaW plans and that a trash monitoring system be impYeWated ( i .e. hourly inspection by employees) to check the FarkiiW area and adjacent praperties affected by the Lresh problems . r y „. / *Omer, X'> I, �r sy, staff recormwa4s thst the Planning commission: ° A. Approve Conditional Una Permit no . 88-57 and Coastal r,. Development permit no. 89--2 for Alternative B an modified by staff (Attaohment No. 3) with the following findings and conditions of approval, and deny Conditional Exception (Variance) No* 89-1 with the- following findings : and B. Apprcvo Special sign permit Mo . E8-'9, as modified by staff , with the following findings and conditions of approval$ 1 . The proposed Taco Bell expansion will be compatible with adjacent proportion and uses because as modified by staff ' s proposal will provide adequate parking , landscaping and reduce circulation conf''licta or-site . 3 . The establishment, maintenance and operation of they Taco bell Restaurant expansion will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing its the vicinity, and not detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. 3 . On-site parking and circulation as modified by statf ' s proposal for the Taco Bell expansion is adequate and does not have the po�.:ential of creating a congestion or circulation hazard . 4 . Ingram and egress to the Waco Bell site as modified by staff ' ts I proposal does not have the potential of creating udditional traffic impacts to the intersection along Pacific Coast Highway* and ninth Street . 5. T'he granting of Conditional use Permit No. 88-57 for the expansion of the Tac.7 Bell Restaurant will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City, of Ifuntington Beach . S. The location, site layout* and design of Lh© proposed Taco Bull expansion aw modified by staff ' s proposal properly adapter the proposed structure to the streets, driveways and other adiacent ttftetures and uses in a harmonious manner , T, 2U onablastion and relationship of the existing Taco Bell McStaugant with the addition of the drive-thru window and lane :W-Wdified by staffs proposal on-site is properly integrated . %20,1�oOMse tO ' snd panting for the proposed Taco Bell expansion , WSWIMA by 8taff's proposal does nct create undue traffic becau*6 it providos adequate parking, on-site circulation and �8nd8+�ep3 nq. staff b rt - 3/21/82 -d-• (22394) �. r `rw 1.1.0000101 IR 1. Tits proposal as recomended by staff is consistont with the goals; and objectives of the City' s General Plan, Coastal slownt and Scenic Highways Elements . 2 . The proposal as recommended by staff is consistent with the Huntington Ikeach ;Coastal Element and with Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act by providing a drive-thru restaurant facility for beach and public recreation accessibility. 3 . The Taco Sell expansion as modified by staff ' s proposal and as proposed by Coastal Development Pvranit No. 89-2 conforms with the plans, policies, requirements and standards of the Huntington Beach Coastal Llement . 4 . Coastal Development Permit No . 59-2 as modified by staff is consistent with the zoning designation of the Downtown Specific Plan-District One., 5 . Coastal Development Permit bl,,i . 89-2 at than time of completion will provide infrastructure in a manner: that is consistent with C-LUP by providing a drive--thru window to an ©xi.tiz&g restaurant . FI1101095 FOIE hFMI&L = CCNDITIQUAji_E,XCEPTU W (V 1. 'There are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicaLle to the land, buildings or premises involved that do not apply generally to other: property or uses in the district . 2« The granting of a conditional exception for reduced landscaping requirement is not necessary 1n order to preserve the erg joymer:t of one or more substantial property rights . 3 . The granting of Conditional Exception (Variance) No . 89-1 for reduced landscaping requirement will be materially detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, or injurious to the conforming (land, property, or improvements) in the neighborhood. 4 . The conditional exception (variance) for reduced landscaping requirmeent in not consistent with the goals and objectives ref the City's General Plan and Land Use May designation of Visitor-Barring Ca aercial, S . The granting of this conditional exception from Section 9109(c) of tbo Watington Beach Ordinance Code will defeat the general purposes or intent of the code which is to provide landscaping along public right-of-ways. f f gtalf Boport 3/21/89 -7- (2239d) c I' 0 N R � h d. The grouting of conditi.onaal zxcepticn (variance) No . 89-1 for x, raluded landscaping requirements will adversely affect they General plan of the 'ity of Huntington beach . I --rest, bL..: Bp YXd Stan PERMIT-M a 1. Strict compliance with Article 961 and the Downtown Design Guidelines will result in a substantial economic hardelhi.p to the applicant. 2 . The proposed 15 foot, 33 square foot pole sign on a temporary two-yoo r basis and then relocated and modified to a maximum 7 foot high montuunt sign will not adversely affect other signs in the areaO 3 . The proposed 15 foot, 33 square foot pole sign on a temporary two-year basix stnd then relocated and mcdifled to a maximum 7 foot high monument sign will not be detrimental to property located in the vicinity of such signs and will be compatible with the surrounding area . 4 . The proposed 19 toot, 33 square foot pole sign on a temporary two-year basis and them relocated and modified to a maximum 7 foot high monument sign and located within the landscaped planter along Pacific Coast Highway will not obstruct padextri en or vehiculpr traffic vision. COMITIONS OE ARPRQYALO 1 . Tho site plan, pursuant to Alternative N (Attachment No . 3) as modified by staff, shall be the conceptually approved layout. 2 . Prior to submittal for building permii.s , the applicant/owner shall complete the following : a. $levations shall depict colors and building materials proposed . b. If outdoor lighting is included, high-pressure sodium vapor ramps or similar energy savings lamps shall be used. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent " apillage' onto adjacent properties and shall be noted on the site plan and elevations , c. A deteilaad soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered Soils IMiaeer . This analysis shall include on-site soil saaWling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed reoomendation3 regarding grading, ceemical and fill properties, foundations, retaining wells , streets, and utilities. Mkai* Report - 3/21/09 -8- (22394) r• I p. �'s do r jY�l ' ;,; ds tbi Dosign Review board @hall review and approve the ,•,,.•,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,•.. fee l loe►inQ: (a) proposed atetuoture■ shall be architecturally compatible with existing struaturees. (b) Revised site plan and elevation# as modified pursuant to Condition go. 1 . (c) All nignage as proposed . (d) Landscaping plan, ee The site plan shall inoludo (or refereines polio) 611 conditions of approval imposed on tho project printed vorbatim. r i +�3 . Prior to issuance of building p ermitarapplicant/owner the shall complete they following ; u . Submit copy of the revised site plan# floor plans and elevations pursuant to Condition, No . I for review and approval and inclusion in the entitlement file. b . A Landscape Construction Spat must be submftteed to the Departments of Co miunity Development and Publics Works and must be approved. The Landmcape Construction Set shall includes a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State Licensed Landscape Architect and which includes all proposed/existing plant materials ( location, type , size quantity) , an irrigation plait, a grading plan, an approved site plan, and a copy of the entitlement conditions of approval . The landscape plans shall bee, in conformance with Section 9609 of the Huntington. Beach Ordinance Code . The met must be approved by both departments prior to issuance of building permits . c. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid . d6 An irrevocable reciprocal driveway and packing easeuaent beetw&w the subject site and adjacent parcel shell be submitted* A copy of the legal instrument shall be �a :fotolved by the Community Deevelopmnt Department or ' the Attolr ' as to form and content and, riheen approve, She I be recorded in the office of the Couity Recorder. A e p�' rMIX be filed with the Department of Community 0001eeolint . Said in8t rument shall be valid fog.. the life ' of thea reesteureAt use with the drive-thru lane . E , o, Provide written evidence t*tint the applicant has negotiated 'F �a a date of Leval, of the eexi:ating billboard . i s'f i *sport - V IW 89 -9- (22396) '0 fin•*'M1' a. mow, l . The applicant shall submit ate olternat fve spooker system for approval by star! . � . All rooftop nechanioal •guipsont shall be $Crooned from any View. :laid screening shall be architecturally compatible With the building in terms of materials and colors . It screening is not designed specifically into the buil4i,ngo ar rooftop mechanical equipment plan must be submitted showing scroeni,nq and must be approved. 4 . The Public !forks Departmq*nt requirements are as rollows : a. Close the existing drive approaches along Pacific waist Highway to Public Works standards . b. Submit a revised plan to be reviewed by than Public Works Department . S . Fire re Department Requirements are as follows -. a . The applicant shall meet all applicable local , State and Federal Fire Codes , Ordinances , and standards . 6. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Coda, Building Division, and Fire Department . 7 . All bmilding spoils , such as unusable lumber , wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material , shall be disposed of at an off.-site facility equipped to handle them. 8. Construction shall be limited Lo Monday - Saturday 7: 00 AM to ' 8 :00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal hoiidayse 9 . The hours of operation shall be: Monday thru Thursday, Sunday 10 : 00 AN to 10: 00 PM Friday and Saturday 10 : 00 AM to 12 Midnight 10. The proposed menu ordering system shall be non-audible after 9=00 PH. i 11 . prior to final buildinL permit approval or issuance of a Certificate of 1coupancy, the following shall be completed: a. The rare►= identification sign pursuant to Spacial Sign Permit No. 88-8 shall be a maximum 15 feet high with 33 selvage feet of sign area for a period of two years . After the too-year period the sign $ball be altered to comply to � a easYiWW I toot high amor!iment sign with maximum 33 square loot of sign area . Staff Report 3/21/89 -10- (2239d) h X, r5 d"1 aloft 4 b. Prior to issuence of building permits# the applicant shall file a cash bond in the amount of $2, 000 with the City for the purpose of indemniering the City for any and all costs incurred in the removal of thv 15 toot high, 33 square toot pole sign. if the sign is not made to conform with the applicable provisions of the sign ordinance after two ySets from the date of approval , the City of Huntington seaah or its agents or employees may enter on the property where said signs are located and remove said signs ant[ the cost of removal shall be deducted from the cash bond and summarily forfeited and paid over to the City of Huntington Beach, and the remainder , if any, returned to the person depositing the bond . co All improvements (including landscaping) to the property shall be completed in accordance with the approved ,Mans and conditions of approval specified herein. d . Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein .shall be accomplished . 12 . The P+g,nni.ng Commission reserves the right to revoke this conditional use permit if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Peach Ordinance Cade occurs i 13 . This conditional use permit shall not become &ffect ive for any purpose until an "Acceptance of Conditions" form has been properly ezecuted by the applicant and an authorized representative of the owner of the property, and returned to the Planning Division; and until the ten day appAal period has elapsed . 14 . This conditiornail use permit shall become null and void unless exercised within one (1) yaar of the date of final approval , or such extension of time as may be granted by the Planning Commission pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 34 days prior to the expiration date. CMI TIONfi., Q1 A&PJ&MY._ �BECI&L SIGII WI` EXIT NQ B e-s 1 . The proposed. 15 foot# 33 square toot pole sign shall be permitted for a two--year period . After the two-year period the sign shall be altered to comply to a maxisam 7 foot monument sign with maximum 33 square feet of sign area . � 3 . Prior to issuance of buildi:.g permits, the applicant shall files a ^ash bond in the aaaount of d3,000 with the City for the ` purpose of indemnifying the City for any and all costs incurred In the re wyal of the 15 foot high, 33 square foot pole sign. If the sign in not made to conform with the applicable provisions of the sign ordinance after two years from the date of approval , the City of Huntington Beach or its agents or Staff Report 3/21/89 (2239d) _, are fs� . e loy'eet May Ontet on the property where said signe iro 1004t6d and remawe said signs and the cost of removal shall be dWucted from the cash frond And summarily forfeited and paid nVnr to thu City of Huntington Beach, and the remainder, if anyj returned to the poison depositing the 47cnd. 3. The Planning Commission reserves the right, to rescind this special sigh• permit approval in the event of any violation of the terms of the applicable zoning laws . Any such decision shall be preceded by notice to the applicant and a public hearing and shall be based on specitic, findings . As an alternative, the Planning Commission may deny Conditional Use Permit No . 88-57, Conditional Exception (Variance) No . 89-1 , Coastal Development Permit So . 89-2 and Special Sign Permit No. 88-8, with findings . &TTACHMMM I 1 . Applicant ' s Proposal, (Revised) submitted at Planning commission Meeting February 22, 1989 2 . Applicant ' s Proposal (Revised) Alternative A submitted Match UP 1989 8 . Staff ' s Proposal (Modified) Alternative B 4 . Letter of opposition gated received February 17, 1989 a . Planning Commission Staff Report dated February 22 , 1989 z 1 c M12- (22394) • k} a , PCH "MTV M m z -fh ?F up on R In jAtO; rm —1—— m �,v; fps. t ) fill q 1 .�• ALLEY ! s M -TACO BELL :)RIVE TMRU ADDITION lilt rYMfIMfT�h'pA�IL�A li Nor NN��aMa Ilu • 1w )d" t� rarwMr R Q . ! �4 Mir L i 1�rMR *• 'r!S . 1 I • n J r � I r r � I W r i R ; p �r JCL = t �` �f 1 ! :,� �� � 'TI►CO�Ir1.RMllit 1'1M�IU A1�ITIgH ,f an W$*Mmo cr. � ,o Won • r.1,�r12ii �,t TACO 59L L IL Ab 0:,J 31 to weir. I- .. Lj� �© ovsft ! 'X�is Nullow,O (AV - rre PT-,&W STAFF PRO i-V SA L . SctiL� ►r�ti L'�o' �Fod) Su+i ��i. • , 41 l yy' RECtIVED 10IM10", tot 1989 FEB 17 Uty ae ftAtimton qsacb DIPARYMrNT OF PIP- 2000 11 t Street s*ntiozz ftaczh, CA 92648 ` Nar Mike,, I z the attached request from Phillip Gilbert it is this caepany s . : ftainjon to go on record againyt the application for the following * There 46 very little parking can site o 0rive up window would put traffic on PCH and surface streets i it would be a nninance to all local residents In Fact, Mike, we should do whatever we can to relocate the Taco Hell to a More itable area. Y. f i• t . no 01 • ••I, `r �I I, j d YS,1 F i --.�--7901 haWoo I Circle, Suite 100 • Huntington Oftch CA 9Z648 • j 7•'4) 842-1401 .ram.,...... 41 'p I 'ftntlhpton beach depertmonL *f oOrnrnunity C"lopme"t sr-A 41, splanNing Cot fission comunity 'Development: ' s ftbtuary 22 P 1969 NU %T 001101TIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 46-57/connITIOM =CEPTIOW (VARIANCR) NO. 99-1lC0A8TAL- DZVRLOPMNT PERXIT NO . 89-2/BPNCIAL SIGN PERMIT NO. 88-8 ARpT.T�''.�,1QT: Richard H. Armstrong &C=2 ^D: 1851- 8 lq« Vista Way February 10, 1989 Suite 262 Vista* CA 92083 NAME=p$Q.C,ESS Y NG Dug: ,April 11, 1989 PROPERTY Jon dylvis Augustine ,fit P.O. Box 4705 Z=: Downtown specific Palm Desert, CA 92261 Plan-District one a jy$e: To permit the expansion allNNHAL PLAN: Visitor-- of an existing • Taco Bell Nerving Cormurcial restaurant by adding a drive--thru Window with a =111TYM ORg: Taco Bell variance for perking and Restaurant and Oil la:pdocaping. The request Vacilitfes also includes the remodel of a nonconforming free- : . 45 net acres standing pale sign. LQCB,TIQR: 818 ' Pacific Coast Hwy. (northeast corner of Pf and Ninth Street) A. Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 88-57 and Coastal bevolopmpernt Permit No . •89- 2 as modified by staff with fin'`.wgs and conditions of , approval, and deny Conditional. mixceptiog: (va:riance� Bo. 89-1 with findings; and H . •Approve• Special 8-.* gn P,�rmit no. 88--8, as madifind by staff, with findings andconditions of approval . t9 { Ar YE�+'OIi19xl�`Y0;8 : Conditional Use Permit ft , .88- 57 , Conditional Exception (V'ariann-0) No . 89-1, and Coastal Development Permit No , 89-2 are requested to expand the existing 1, 627 square foot Taco Bell Restaurant by adding A•!M4" f 111• ' 1R a•i ll t ): r J Y Iy�r•t er 450 NgUArer foot driver-thru * window and expanding the perking area PUtO " adj eftgt 50 foot wider lot with s variance request for C440006 park AU4 landscaping rerquirem nts. The restaurant is donconforming suss of the structuvW x reduced setback along Ninth Otte et; thus, any expansion rewires approval by they Planning Cops iss ion. C Aditionol Eseeption (Variance) No, 89-1 has been Initiated because they proposal doer not comply with the Huntington beach Ordinances Code# and Articls 960, Parking and Landscaping, in the following areeass a . Bectton 9603 specifies that 60 degree angle parking contain a 20 foot aisle width. The applicant is proposing a 15 foot aisle width for the four (4) parking spades to the rear of the property adjacent to the drive-thru lane . b. Section 9606F( 1) specifies that food and beverage establishments with more: than twelves meats on a separate ,parcel of land shall provider parking at a ratio of one (1) .apace per 60 gross square feet of restaurant floor area; a total of 30 spaces area required . The applicant is proposing a total of 29 on-site parking apaceep consisting of 17 standard spaces and 5 compact spacers (17 percent) . ce Section 9608 (c) specifies that a ten (10) foot wide landscaped berm ahall be provided along any ,urea^tsfder property liner (Pacific Coast highway and -Ninth Stree4t) except at driveway Openings .' The applicant in proposing to close the two driveways along Pacific Coast Highway and provide a new driveway with three (3) foot wide landscaper planters. No new landscaping is proposed along 'the existing 2 foot exterior x1do *ard setback along Ninth Street . SPSOial Sign permit No . 88--8 is a request to modify ,the existing nonconforming 15 foot high pole sign by replacing the erzisting sign with a 33 square foot rectangular sign. The variances is requested ' because the modified sign exceeds the height and miss requirements of the Downtown Design► Guidelines (maximum ,height is 6 feet andraaximam area is 15 square feaeat) . es QEI AL PLAN DESIGNATION: Visitor-Serving Commccial WIRE : Downtown Specific plan-District One LAND USX., Restaurant and oil facilities Nort.h.,.,of. SUIRJAct ProrAM1"L'S'' GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: High Density Residential ZONE: Downs town Specific Ulan-District Two L"D USE: Apartnent building Staff Report - 2/22/89 -2- (2057d) if �r y "r 1' f1 1�'►p1 c 'J4 �. ,1 , v .,- t 1,,I 11t• i �" v ,,,, ,. ' ' , • 1''., , • , I�, _ y ,•,fir. . fk , t r VON WM'iIOXs Visitor-Olervis COOMOVciaI Domtom specific Plan-District One Motel � fl282Irrolrt Open dpace-RecrQation " . . Oo"Atowr specific Plan-District Sloven ; t Park "MIAL PLAN MIGMIMN: Nipu Density Residential son I Downtown -Specific Plan-District %No* LSD VbX: Condominium couple h:•a, � wry► �DT1�►]t. R��; , The proposod project is. categorically exempt pursuant to Class 1, Station 14301 of the Califocnia anvirann:ental Quality Act , �...� . ...����a► .Tub Tba: proposod, projo+ct to expand the existing Taco Dell Res.taurantt is 10oO94 within tfs appealable area of the co+ast.ul *One . Theretorsi . cbaoti . boy*lop lust Posit No. 39-2 has been prepared in _conjunction with: t i itic rra►1 Use Permit No . 88 •-S7,, Conditional Exception �tta�c l de> It*. 89-1 and special slr.J Permit No . 88-a . Coostol Povoolopmeint Permit No . 89-8 may be approved or conditi*nclly approved oelr after it has booms found to be in cbr:formance with the Coastal 21mant of the General Plat:' by making the following findingar: (a) IM. That ' ..he development project proposed by the coastal . da Velopmut permit application conforms with the pisas, policies , requirements and standards of the Coastal. Zlement . Mem131kZJM. That the coastal develo #t pornii $ p�ric 't c4 s Consistent with the C$ suffix, the base xoning din clot '61F. npecific plan an well as other provisions of the Itwtntis:gton . &Mob Ordiiiance +Colic applicable to the project . (c) 29d ANKAn That at the titaa of completion the proposed pm develoent can provided with the inf restructure in a manner that is coaeistent with C-LUP; (d) =9arills aeetaa That the development conformswith the public accanx cad public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act . 6TATtM: Not applicable. Buff Report - 2/22/59 (7057d) c , , i 11 Mb N ►x �Jeot Le located within the. bowntown Specific Kan aid thareforo is subject to the developoent standards, fal provisioom and Downtown Design guidelines of the 6peCific not applicable. Tho .following is a coning conformance matrix which aompsrees the proposed project W th •the applicable development standards of the Downtown Specific Plan, District One, and Article, 960, Parking and Landscaping &BRU1114 grL!,Qosed 4 . 3 ,07(b) Sidoyard Sotback 20% of lot 2 ft . exiatinq (OTSPOI) frontage, not Minth St , )* less than 15 ft. 9603 600 perking 9 ft . s 19 ft. , 9 ft . z Met. , 20 ft . aisle 15 ft . aisle k width width** k 9605(e) lYrive--thru 1 space per 7 spaces sta6king credit 23 lineal ft. (165 divided by 23 K 7) 9606F(1) Restaurant 1 space per 60 ' 22 space parking gross sq. ft. plus 7 stackin'g (1, 774 di vid*4 credit, total by 60 d 30 29 spaces** spaces) 9608(c) Front and side 10 ft. wide 3 ft. (fit ** yard landscaping landscape berm 2 ft. (Ninth St . )* * Nonconforming . ** Conditionsl fcaption (variance) request Miele circuYA+ A; They applica"t 'a request to acid a 150 squh re foot drive-thru window to the existing 1, 624 square foot nonconforming Taco Sell Restaurant includes expansion of the parking area onto an adjacent lot and consolidation of two driveways on Pacific Coast Highwsy into' ojnee , Oil faciliti.ees on the lot will be removed or relocated on the site In accordance with Fire Department requirements . Staff Report - 2/22/09 (2057d) A00017 i There are coveral concerns relative to the proposed drive-thru lanee 4=00 8 to all parking spaces, the driveway on Pacific Coast highway, and internal on-site Circulation. ingress and egress to the give ' ian* from !Ninth street opposite of the normal right-side driving patterns (as* Attachment No . 3) has the potential to cause serious circulation conflicts at the entrance to the drive-thru lane and ` along Ninth street. in an effort tb mitigate patrons from entering in the wrong lane the applicant is proposing an activated "no entry" gate . s'ven with -the gate s'y'stem, it still preasgnts an awkward -traffic flow. k • The drive-thru loo area which can be entered from than alley to the M ` rear and the exist ng parking area acc6xoible from Pacific Coast sir Highway is poorly designed . During peak hours of usage the queuing of vehicles to got into the drive-thru lane has the potential to cause conflicts with the on-site parking layout, alley access and the possible off-site circulation along Pacific Coact Highway and Ninth street . When the derive-thru lane is fully occupied, access to the primary parking area from the alley and Ninth Street is precluded causing greater usage of the Pacific Coast Highway access point . , in addition, maintaining a driveway. on Pacific Coast Highway is contrary to the goals of the Downtown Specific Plan and Circulation Element of the General Plan which is to reduce ingress and egress pointy along Pacific Coast Highway in order to improve traffic flow on pacific Coast Highway. Additionally, a conflict occurs with the on-site parking layout, specifically the four (4) spaces delineated at the -rear of the property. When stacking occurs in the drive-thru lane, accessibility to these spaces is not available. Also, 60 degree angle parking ,requires a 20 foot aisle width; the applicant ' s proposal indicates 1.5 feet which is inadequate for proper � maneuvee►rabili:Y :?C•nto those spaces. with regards to they variance request for front yard landscaping, the applicant is proposing a three (3) foot landscaped planter along Pacific Coast Highway (front) and no new landscaping along Ninth Street (exterior) of the subject property. New landscaping in proposed to accentuate the drive-thru lane to the rear of the property. Code requires a ten (10) toot landscaped berm along the front and side of property adjacent to the public right-of-way. The Design Review Hoard reviewed the request because it is located within the Downtown Specific Plan. The Design Review Board had concerns regarding more landscaping along Pacific Coast Highway, treatment and screening of the oil facility, they Circulation conflicts with the proposed drive-thru lane and the billboard located on--site. The landscaping along Pacific Coast Highway does r not reflect then landscaping corridor image developing along the Pacific Coast Highway streetecape. As a result, the Design Review Board recommended the applicant work with staff to resolve these issues . Staff Report 2/22/89 -5- (2057d) , M _ M 4. dew 4M hi 1p y$.)�, � . . +; JI 1iIF�•'� lltl �(IpI•rA. •M •\ �yNJI'(',J}v *�1. ,,�' _, I'WR axe►' r I " ■ ibAlfl conformanot Matrix which c*mV&r*a the 81 e' (Xtteohmaf No, S) with the applicable developseent a24*40 Of the 'Odwatown Design (guidelines : trod I taft Fre istodiou sign ,L 911 -dish 15 sq. ft. 33 sg. ft . * Ouldelinee --height 4 f t . high, 15 ft . high monument type eziating pule sign* * Special sign permit request I+ The existing pole sign is located at the corner of Pacific Coast a Highwa and Ninth Street and 1,. 15 feet high. The applicant is Oproposing to remove the existing sign: lo,jo and replace it with a 33 qusre - fioot dbublo-faced sign can atop the ezisting pokes sign. The applicant states (Attachmeent No . 2c) that the use of the existing pole al n is necessary as a result of the development along Pacific . Coast "Chwa►y which he states obstructs visibility to his site. Stag. I& its, .review Of tlfe sites, believes that the site is provided . with 44604te v1sfibillity since It in located at' a signalized inthro4atiori and has approximately 125 linear feet of Pacific Coast 111ghway f iontaga. it is' ip+acific*lly noted in the Downtown Design duidelluees that pole signs are prohibited in the downtown area. As a Compromise, staff is a;adoemndinq that the sign be constructed as ,an architecturally I compatible$ 7 foot high monument sign with 33 square feet of sign area the ir4loestesd no shown on staff•a alternatives , fsite plan. Another iNNUO that in of concern is the: billboard .located along the easterly prcj�itty iinfe 'at pacific Coast Highway. Section 4, 3j.i_ sual rW of the Coastal Element states: "Signs which do not t hpXWI'` *!'o tl4h :r+i late!'! ..to 'an activity, service or comity available *a the .,Vsr4Wsis *111 be prohibited. This would act to Yalu ', �riTbards. " in addition, Suction 9. 5. 3 of the Coastal Ilement policies states : "Prohibit new billboards within the coastal soft*, " Also, the Scenic ifighwal''s Xlenont states that the City is trying to more billboards along pacific Crust lfighway and thereby qualify the highway to be Included in the State Scenic Highway System. Therefore, staff recommends that the billbr and be removed an a condition of approval for the proposed restaurant expansion. • J Staff Report 2/22/89 (2057d) i , f�.r� y#,�.;sir. , � r • r ��� ' FJ n� 9,' I� 1 ( Y �'\r, r•,�'I , i ( Syr, . spa • I ►, I 11. , , ` � ��af�\R.n l►1 err ■�,�e Mite �lsnt ssv�ersl, issues related to the proposed expanxion, an sWrooll IV Sit+ plan (Attachment No. 4) is recoamirndsd. It !jo& MWCOWSM of the circglation pattern, landscaping and CoSt rkinp,, The proposal closes, the drive approach ailong Zk piphMey provides the ld foot landsca in bartius, and prGr , 0940 F094rAU parking aR4 &tole Width. rThs a ternativ at relieVes the circulation conflicts one eliminates the ' that ' �er�sa�: uMst■. • ' since the property to the east Will be used to provide reMquired '• parking for the restaurant , a legal instrument , approved as to form by the City Attorney, must be submitted prior to the i onuance of building permits which ties together the: properties. This I1 instrument will insures that the properties shall be held together as one as long so the restaurant use exists on the subject property and adequate parking is provided . Staff recommends that the planning Commission: A. Approve Conditional Use Permit No . 88-57 and Coastal Development Permit Rio . 89-2 as modified by staff with .the following findings and conditions of approval, and deny Ccraditioual Zzee:ption (variance) No . 89-1 with the following `1 f ixsd3nq g and 0. Aniove 80ci.al Sign Permit No. 88--8, an modified by staff, w$th the following findings and conditions of approval . 1 . The proposed Turn Bell expansion will .be compatible with adjacent properties and ures because as modified by staff 's proposal will provide adequate parking►, landscaping and reduce circulation conflicts on-site. 2 . The. establishment, . mai.nteneace and operation of the Taco- Zell Restaurant expansion will not be detrimental to the general 1 welfare: of persons working or residing in the vicinity and not dotriMental to the value of the property and improvements in y the neighborhood. � �I 3 . On-site parking and circulation as modified by staffs proposal for the Taco Bull expansion is adequate and doer not have the ' potentliel of cresting a congestion or circulation hazard. 4 . Ingress and agress to the Taco Hell site as modified by staff ' s proposal does not have the potential of creating additional traffic impacts to the intersection along Penifi.c Coast Highway and Ninth Street. Staff Report - 2/22/89 (1097d) h rl''"'''r•, � f � .y » at Conditional use permit do. 81-57 for the W"WAOA of t" Taco sell Restaurant will not adversely affect ftWrRj plan of the City of Huntington Beach. d . TM Jo0ationt site laycut, and design of the proposed TOOO Bell 141"t" so "alfLod %to staff 's proposal property adapts th* ► r M ature to stro6ts, driveways and other WaCGnt ►a�ow aM4 uses in a harmnious manner k: 7. The cooK tstion and relati.onwhip of the existing Taco hell r t; Restaurant with the addition of the drive-thzu window and lane e* modified by staff ' s proposal on-site is properly integrated. 8. The access to and parking for the proposed Taco Bell expansion, as modified by staff ' s proposal doom not create undue traffic because it provides adequate parking on -site circulation and landscaping . INr PERXIT, NQ .w t: • 1. The proposal as recommended by staff is consistent with the Goals ,and objectives of the City's General Plan, Coastal Element and Scenic Highways Elements. 2 . The proposal an recommended by utaft is consistent with the Huntington Beach Coastal Slement and with Chapter 2 of the California Coastal Act by providing a drive-thru 'restaurant facillt7, for beach and public recreation accesnibility. 3 . The Taco Sell as ansion as modified by staff ' s proposal and as 11 proposed by Coastal Development Permit Rc . 89-2 conforms with J the pIssas, policies,, requirements and standards of the Huntington Beach Coastal Element. 4. Coastal Develo went Permit no. 89-2 as modified by staff is consistent with the Boning designation of the Downtown Specific Plan-District S 6" CoastaIDevelopment Permit No. 89-2 at the time of completion will previde infrastructure in i manner that is consistent +side C-LUP by providing a drive-thru window to an exiting restaurant# �'YmDIs B „MR. D=XAL coNnLTIgjULL�I2...,(TAWZ) NO- $5..1: 1. There are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the land, buildings or promises involved that do not apply generally to other property or uses in the district . 2 . The granting of a conditional exception for reduced landscaping � requirement is not necessary in order to preserve the enjoyment � of one or more substantial property rights . Stott Report 2/22/89 -e- (2057d) LSp F y4 I a Conditi.ons't Szoaption (Variance) go. ®9-1 for J T�4c At will be notarially detrimental au.•r hesltbr safe •adl +ere, or Injurious to the j; X aar roVWWAts) in the $000 o tonal ozoaption (varlanoe) for reduced lan"capino „ , s got. consistent with the goals and Objectives of It It ' ty*#-, earal plan and hand Use Map designation of actor-Serving Commercial . d+ The gFauting of, this conditional ezeeption from Section 9603, 9605(o , ' 96Q66'(l.) and 96084c) of the Huntington Beach ordinance C',ode WIs 11• deftest the general purposes or intent of the code whi,o to 'prwide landsoapi ng along public right-of-ways and w adequate on-site parking . The granting of Conditional Exception (Variance) no . 89-1 for reduced landscaping requirements will adversely affect the Oeaeral Plan of the City of Huntington Basch. �.. Strict compliance ,with Article 961 and the bawntown Design Guidelines will result in a substantial economic hardship to Mppi,icant The •pro ose# wnument sign as recom aended by staff will not advexd4i y a.ftct other signs in the area. 3 . The �roposad monument sign as recomwnded by staff .rill, not be � itetr tal t pro arty located in the vicinity of such sign; at:d will be comWatible with the su:r:rounding area . 4 . The Pr.Oposed sign as recommended by staff aftd located within the lix4scaped planter along, Pacific Coast Hiobway will not obst ct pedestrian or vehicular traffic vision. 1. fte site plaar as modified by staff• o proposal, shall be the cone p+tual 1p approved layout. ' 2. Prior to submittal for building permits, the applicant/owner shall complete the following: i a. Xlevatio ns $h+all depict colors and building materials � proposed. b. if outdoor lighting is included, high-pressurd sodium vapor lamps at similar energy savings lamps shall be used . All r outside lighting shall be directed to Prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties and shall be noted on the site plan 284 elevations . dtoaff Report - 2/22/89 (2037d) r ,K M►t�l !i fll tiir� r ,c '5+1, ? � '• '� i 'Y 'f •• .a + Y �} �C �Y y yy y �y 5Y et �a�fi Il r J R+'Mrf •c .. "r r '1 ' r 5yrM r r;�•„,/�1, �+? M i .+i 4•, ', 4" y •' fl 6 r r 1 ' ,ilk� '•/ Fk .•„. '1' wy* ,'• at 1 �:jsalySjs oUl l be �teared by a TOGiat6f0d ti r oxolysig shall luaiude air-sitar goi 1 i refoary tooting of material* to pro , .a. i codi ohesi�asi *� t ��sr fcunastiaes, retaining walls* ■treeta, and 4 � ,, r• , Ve Riga' Review Sosrd shall review and approve the 11 (a) P'itbposed structure$ shall be architecturally Compatible with ezisting structures . (b) Rs*iSeld : s.4.6;a plan and elevations as modified pursuant to;-Conaltion No. I . . Cad All signage as proposed. (e� LeAdicapitag plan. The site plan shi lV include - (or preference page) all ca itiosd of approval imposed on the• project printed verbatin. 3 . Prior to irsunrice'' of building permits, the applicant/owner ►,Ietb the foll6wing: !i'. Sh C of tho' lrevised site plan, floor plans and sl'd+�s'ti r►i urd+aai�t to Condition No , 1 for review and 2pt"Vol a inclusion in the entitlement file. b. A Latidgespe construction Sept must be submitted try the Dejpgttments of Corp unity Development and Publib Works and st be eppsoved, The Landscape Construction got shall Jaclu4e a landscape play: prepared and signed by a State hJ'd ed Landscape Architect and which includes all prapbse:dl'etiatinq plant materials (location, . type, raise, . quentitr) , an • irrigation plan, +a grading plan, an approved site 02ie4 zed a 00PT of the enti,tles�nt co ditfone of � avoto*al. The 'landscape plans shall be is coldf6fta ice ;with 6"tio9k 9608 of rho Hont9.ngton Beach Ordinance Code. , The s: . set rust to approved by both departments prior to Issuance of building peRnits, c. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid. d. An irrevocable reciprocal driveway and parking casement between the subject site and adjacent parcel shall be submitted. A copy of the legal instrument shall be approved by the Cosmunity Development Department and the City Attorney as to form and content and, when approved, Mall be recorded in the Offices of the County Recorder . A copy shall be filed with they Department of Community Development . � j Staff Report - 2/22/88 _10-- (2057d) a r � t���.�i�'NiAll' r},fit�.i{thy + yOC+ r,r � .. '•r�.�.M1.f. • , ,. !t. : , ., ; '� ..i r •a a law!" r nit ♦ X�� .}k�, :,i + �• It i . +h• r r+ r Ap r w 'ate Y7II��. r �e•I�,PY+M 9 "�ly'f't,. ,-i r 'ti' - ' •N: {T r �• I rimpy} �� . f ,c r l .ad*�� is 'n. iNt 1111koard located ow-site adjacent to ,r Varks ftrartmMt sequicements ars as follows s ATM` ,.f, t • # aid dat ,Ntiriq ,derive opproaches aiond Pacific Coast d, NOON stondardt : Irim ftrartment Require ate are to 90210w5: o The applicant shall most all applicdbl4 .local , State and Iradersl Fire Codes , Ordinances , and standards . 61 Tho developmat shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code. Building Division, and fire Depairtmernt. 74 All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipet and r. o%fixer 'Aurplus or unusable material, shall be Aisposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. a , Construction shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7:04 AM to ;. : 8 :00 W, Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal �. �4lidays. 9 . Prior, to final building permit approval or issuance of a Ca rtWoote of Occupiincy`, .the following shall be completed: a« .• or identification pign shall be altered to cocap 1 Y wth*staff ' s racomnandation for a maximum 7 foot high raanumeit sign with maximum 33 square feet of sign area . b. All improvements (including Landscaping) to the property shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans and conditions of approval specified herein. co Compliance with all conditions of approval apse-ified , herein snall bO accomplished. la. The Planning Com:aissi.on reservers the right to revoke this conditional use permit if any violation of them conditions or the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs . 11. This conditional use permit shall not become effective for any purpose until on *Acceptance of Conditions`' form has been properly executed by the applicant and an authorised representative of the owner of the property, and returned to the Planning Division; and until the ten day appeal period has elapsed. 12 . This conditional use permit shall become null and void unless ezercised " wi.thin one .(1) year of the date of final approval, or { such extension of time as may be granted by the Planning Codmission pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prier to the expiration date. Staff Report - 2/22/89 (2057d) I •,, 1f b ' e , � r L * 'A �� .ice DIY, .,i r .. • ' r , ' •+ + �Y.Rw �. a f,� , k i h�l OP 1 ,l♦iIh[' ,��ry9lr.ys��McA+ f'�,�4"`�'�I�'�g'�'�y'�''h1Ra1�p�4MY�v•,,;`W gal k'.`.,� ,�g� ,,b,r r51{�{ ION PZRKZ Islam J"- ' J'40, Plisn *Ad mon nt sign as nodltlW by atat! Full be � . say► : lt� � 0 40090. The woevannt alga aha;;:1 not " wedre foot iA; � anp j►4 Niei•gh ��r�stvisi� r rig do irescind 3 a9 ' Val, In to ev*"t e! an violr.t�on ni � of• the rwppable #ctr�it�q laN►s . 11np such . decision , 'I" pr10 fa by rwtiae to the •"l icent and a public haar isq And shall be based on specific findings. -;Ax an alternative, the Piaiwing Ccmaliseion may deny Conditianai Use VOrmit No, i0-�S7r Conditional Reception (Variance) No. 89-10 Coastal Weio nt• Patmit no. 89•-2 and Special Sign pex= i.t No. 88-9, with „ i . Ar44 slap 2. Narratives 3: Site plans, elovat�ions and floor plane dated February e, 1.989 a proposal ;8 POUM x4view Board minutes dated January 19, 1989 : ' Asig,16alites propc►sed pole sion Altetnative Findings for venial i ;I E •. x i i r, i Staff. Report - 2/22/89 (2057d) NI ♦ ♦ 4W1 ' 1 ♦ 'V i ,t���♦fir. 7I • *; I F, i j-. rw 1 Z Y erf�l.a"• �� i r� J' I � ' ' '�r' ^y' �`.•'IYfy 1 ",�Ini Y •+ THY ,F, • x ,�•.'!, ,� ��r�fr'tf 'Y'. rl,•M .F. ,'; 1 * �+ r' •, * r r �•f;�,� •'W,'6? 1 h ,�•. v + Be crow. t,; O,lmprv* �r�Nldn�le 8`+ d1 t .: T«Iw�t�a►s dlo�10 August 29, 1088 City of Nontington Beach i FAOU ag rtment main t l tt� #oadth Co. 92847 `'. k4h Dri�thru project, TSIC0 hell 818 Pacific Coast Highway, Huntington Beach, Ca. die' lrlembertsr 4 understand :rom Phil Gllbert, offer architect, that the City of Huntington Beach 'acquiring.thit we,perform a building Im- sp upgrade on tha referenced Taco geu� as a condition of constructing a drive-thru and other upgrades for that facility. This regWrernent is a major concern to mo as I do not have:the funds for the additional work requested. tthee t the reataurant' havebeen on the decline for the past three years, even h oil tan-year f6mchirsee, I have participated in Taco Deft 8atrh' h t ornia label tladvertiolag campaigns, and have maintained better,the'n'-Average operational 0i4ftY ds for the fast food chain. I have also done facility, fades and ` r• 1:01 sw equip:!rrent•to better serve the customer. Bass in l985 wore769, 7,861; In .11hey �rerc�*iOgr ll; in 1907 they wtre $�53,363; and ao tar err 1988, salmiito n 15% cortipirred to 19$ salsa. The debiiirro in sales has not only grtatly , h tcd the prod stability, of the restaurant, but has also reduced saes Fax revenues frothoe:r busiremw to the city of Huntington Beach. 'r V,**1TA ft*,,6bcve, we leer that the long-terra businesrr picture in hu"AIhaton 40wh is pwtivel lllarry ai Cie redevelopment projects now in plamninq t e r� th with #0 npavw of the piear shoul4 Ue kMt us all. Cur drives-thru a h are atWAS to Mira the roetsur4nt sues at.and ebove those of 1985. Taco 8011'a itakss has shown that drive-throes increase sales bar"15 to 80% cw ruprew. f In addltkm,to the drive-thru'projeat, owd In conjunction with it, we are-also Owning to &N r8dHona paring, stmtantial now landscaping,�,� ated building ,ti nSt v rn aao,Belt signagey AM new.Interior dow. WN also pleura to Completely romps► rat the btrixdbog exteMor. The total result wilt bd very pl"Sing tq the community 4M to our ouston►orap' and it will be in keopirg with the uWados occult within thto vIdAy 0 the restaumt« . 'tM dollar UrnAment to achieve this project will be stdWantia4 bath In terms of thew reel estate sequlsth.rr already accomplished to facilitate the project and tho,to onios needed for the actual construction. We have boon able Ear obtif n finarrt;ing for the project as proposed but will be unable to acquire uny more fumb to do additional work at this thee. 1�' n`7#11M " �; 11� Yy��^7��F Y`�.�M f'yl�h!AI�'�!¢w� aA" j { , � n{' r MS 5✓ ';. � 1 �-_ 2. Y *• dvlQ ,Jr Is. fir -Ch I "N! * �. MI�Y e1lf la M,, r ,,v' � }•J ��...s. •�, .n' Iyp� ,.�;;�����'`�'Al y: 1, Y I ,h• r � 1 .� �a•ll n 01 1 1 3 A 'l l• 4 I .�. .. 1, ' 1 ' y r F "�Lr 1 �q^ A A' •�{ I _y,1�,'r t ',�fi•h• I ,,,�, y+ IY ''�,'� �T .^ 4r �'"1t—n 1j 0'" wA. r .,,IAi ♦ ••; al•i l 7 1' '# �I k'�d 14 F.�llr, � ��1 r' � { t i' I� � b '•�. M,17 ' r ,� ��'., �' �� �''y R` '.Yr,.�' 1 I�• I-�' I � I.n t• •;�, '� Y I ,.In�� � ��'• KM , L+{ r i� �'py I l7 IM4f'•t':-ydl+W��..�.•,cl i.:�1 �1� i! `I "4r !r, 1889 Taco Bell, 018 Pacific: Coast Highway City Of HUntinCtorl 8"Ch page t L'1 Mn, I ire-• mek rog-M poritive'inove 1&ward, roi&Uy In 1ight of do- ��;` ;rotit. JU (;ity's requirement that we 0* *OW what we ' ; ,;�. •. �I �l0� wi11 pause a gr'ee: f��>�i� h � itu►'1�. ;ti;, ,t to�. ude a total buildit uWa<de in the p��tat, but i4ir • or' the read statod that the current economics rrtll Only ►1!ow pna heCot•e 01thar. we'feet that if we can complete the drivie-�ithru , '00*J t #M the eal#c return to 1986 or above levels, then we can wider • A. ' t °.ire pep jr requpit that you waive the additional upgrsde requirerwint at o e ahead to co the drproject � and •'t eie rrr v el�r complete iva*thraat P r t4q& It MKOOON 00 the roetsurant is returned to former sates and profits, ivy fan r*14d the total im&go upgrade laeue. 1+ wr�tt�wr iil th# ttlatter i appreciated Ole I ln f+ll' r 1 1 ..1� 1 �1 IJ • � r/ pp \ " rt',�i�d' '.• 'JIII JI,.. if Fitt A Ff*MONONI Q! Not Corp. Va 1; � rli OC� W grid, SUN* a r � Al dear star (tact Phil Qilbort has indicated to me thr:t the staff has soar* concern to- ' the policing of the parking axes and drive thru sapecially curing busy at the rdco sill. I eat ■doge* y*u that just as we der nod, regular lot chicks are wade by restaurant p gamer for the purpose of keeping the lot and surrounding area free of litter, „+.r •timad #fir checking other paXk1 ng and austmer related problems. This policy will caa- � ilni", after the dri^re thru addition in addition we plan 'to place aaa employee in the aft durLuir busy twimo* at the drive thru order station to assist ,In '.':be- taxing or order* and in helping 41rect sax traffic problems that may arise. 2i y" have any questions r"ording these matters/ p14ds* do not hesitate to contact moo '• �r+sY* nrs, ' fte ere . e""t'r :ODD i XOMM SEE ft", 64,11 prraliabirle saner A'' y ' , 1 4 II 1 ' ' I , lIi r; • 06 a!EMv Ifs 1 TOO'; 1 ram' v } yy•' o' -Y+ 1•y, � 1 'w' �y��' h• �Pr 'MYi�M � r,k' a 'yt .:, ' . ;� � a .,y rl , ! 1 L ' r , +v y';x: .. ✓ �'' ot + �J'��' r! •� �' � . ,'�'rls w+h I• . �. �a 1.,,�'�,� . � �r..+,� I• !,''�' d , r '6 ' ; �, � �,', {';.�.,, }�,� ��,1 �, 1 1 '�� •r 'v :+, y 1 r '•V4 i 1. .. , y 1'• Y� ��f•1 '�'7�••�,�q'��1�� 17• �l •as ` I • v`I• " ' •, 'v ,� •+• v ` • r 1 � y,�n,, . . a a'�'aP+r:r.. '• hY�l f1M' 'I.;r• > Nf{�, .r;•,M• ra_�ti' 'I:l�''T• 'le�T1f':1�7, �!"'h.' /1 �•. '•1. sopled) +�y_r�.• I q c , _' . . L Jeco4ry A , lghh .Y • ` TO : City Of NuAtinMton hatch Department of plannins Services AQpO mein St , fiustincton hatch , CA 92046 Rg : TACO ML DRIVh THAD APPLICATION Sim Pacific Coast Hwy > ', , hEO_URST FAR LAleDSCApB �A�IAMCR ' 'i Ths purpose o this letter is to request approval for is vanlel 'oe to Al landscape requirements for the. refareneed a�lta . The app.l'i cation to add a drive thru pick up window thaludee a Iarile increase in landecaped.: aree to 2 , 700 square feet ( 13% of the total site ) . The proposed landscaping is . , r. distributed on the site as allowed by the existing, buildin Tao present landscape setback requirements were &doped alter the existing restaurant was constructed . It Is impossible to conform to the existing requirements without .:amolltloa of the hullding.. The owner of the restaurant has presented a convincing narrative Indieatlug demolition to be economically unrealistic . , Thla project will offer sIgnificent improvements to the landscape of Pacific Coast May , in RuatinBton Beach . ,y FORM ! GUILD 4'r • t :1 {, 'jr • M v,rid•` a `, ,� ` _ L r* i yr, t� N k •- y , • � y�� soft r VA,'Y, ra�xPN�' � .' Y..�'�' f .,,r+ py N! f' '� "r��4 . ,� .1r••,�.•, L>.# fir �"1 ' r yll , ,a M1?• u a r, wY1FaWra. ti••LY day•• I'+Iq •:N .. do ., �.• ..r., Y .a1 '[`' Yam. S` TOW Up 06 OF O r ative for dprciai sign permit application to planning commission: . ,��,;;• , it ((; it 4 ' tang this appli+natzion• _ ` !! l + rig lee nstiooa ., # �p image to n scx#W Yoga r ,gn e as r at all coVany 4��id anchiae Taco fail e�statara is 990 ors tp: ; #,% siew Image. xn order to dot ply with Taco 2411 raquirer- s aby resq"sting that we . be .a 1 lowed to change out old s Flo; .'�ilding signs to the now image signage. fte reason ', RL tOk: aceggesting that ire, be allowed to retain the existing pole sign and ' that ;,tecent biiiding on both sides of the restaurant have, caused viaability problems for our business , especially to traffic moving in a' aarthe rly direction. ( b) a+ !.' ],1, in que;tacidh is located at the corner of Pacific Coat di .va Ninth atr t and serves the beach c c mnunity of Runtington . � "f'a alerig. *aci.fic Coast Highway. ( o) The pro Est antaile ' the remav41 of the old image Taco sell sign faces on the exiattng .pole sign and the old image, Taco Sall sign letters on .the building bell tower and replacing both with ,the now Taco Dell image signagb. i (d) turra4z .! users are both residential and visitor serving . ( a) The a onai circumstance that applies to, thria property is that �! CN&�►O fO rioent ..bui ld$ng on both sides of the :property, the 'via- ablig the tasai op the property is atmpa�.�rl. ; � • , . request 4042 nothing new. dust upgrades ghat is , alselady -' there C fir) Yh r dd1tL6''a to the ability tm comply With Taco Hell St&UdakdS arW tby aoo '1R to the current, Waco 8e�.i standards this' '�nghaat eril�. mlie� us to tldipAte in one of the basic regnlrements ei' ' retail � bus iaaaw t rdrgnize ' it to ba Adequately seeb by the public yo' ,. a srrvin�. i C ) ammuse the r eque:st does nothing - now but merely cpgradm$ an existing �rieitiori. � u a i w , y - r •rr „ ter- „'r^•. ,I r.•`'1! L ID t 00 Ailk LA lo 1 y4 •'I r / L i �4.iL J' � •1. 4 •L F • ' '�• ! • Rt. a .�h'' ;7 r .•e r"' -' pR � 'fF" ,�yr � r f r, rlrl�r•" w' r 'w�'ir'A vl• J L.� '/*+ �! OF rr ,•^�!�� ear' J• 'y • 'r r a � f„ ,"r y � r. r t F c 0 note b~ 3 . -A= wrr•r•r��. �w.w�r�rw •�rwr. �� A � 'y . � 11• .. �V1 , fi ' it ALLSY 16 #r p YACO MILL DRIVE?MAU ADDITION OEM slaft 6.4Amm IS '°� � •�'Y NY 1 r{� �b C' ��h, .w' ���Y A„U�. �•'�,��'Y���..b�f"�h,.�•r���'u+��,•,',�, K h � , • �a :,4. �.. J� , 04 A41 �• �y r . �•'..�,a r' _ '1'y �I '' . ,',y.,T'Al,��y 41,E �,!•� ; ��, 1•, '.}r � .j:" rrd*Awe', •.. � •I•,M .y1i. JY•k�•2• 'II ',\,7.•wr(..'W'r rA •ri.•r.r '•'1 '.a rr�.• ,.,ho•r'. .. � ly ' �--^'- —.e•i' to 110 t • � '�. ':� • rcair o '��. a' , '. ILl i ' I iLar i ■ • Jop ll O t • �rr A . �,f9 � I �" fir. •� r ..r, � + ••r�r� • rM • Oa•w •w •. ra'.w•wr.r_rwaw r �'� •a �, r ar-a-a iaw+---w - �+�-w w-ww.•aa•ww-��• -- r-raraarrrr.••aara,-ra•aa• ■..w-r_aawww..rali - -•-wr a•-war.•a-w-r.www+ar - �w• SI Si ,,•;',fir,' raw 1 ., , �,►� �:y ' I s,'��• 'v.l � ,�9, , r��di, I , i �' • • ' , , ` 1 rI ,r yyi k S i ' �1Y I t i � S 1' ••1 ,Y f ;kt• L i . � I,Q••� s• I ` �� N� �;y.•>v " Fq'9 r Y' �Lir�'(II-7 •,, 1. 1 tK I R 9 .jaom ;r y r r � All X. i j4 C,Y,•.I 1r ' IY Y,v 1 LLLL r.y y{� I � 1 �1 M.�•.y r r' r, , .,���T p 'l ,• N Y, r ,r• ML,ti Y ,, r. I• 1 �. � � , ^ "4'� f�l Y � �W Y\ �nM">i,°r,'Y! � _}�,� 1 xS'k1 a Af� l � ,rr ', R ,,�:y l 1 �J` ♦ ' ,',b WW�� ,�' •��' �a � / 1 �N�1, °F M "Rr�,kaki' ,,I + t� w 7�•4`, r„ R� t y� ��` r '* ,' � .�c'tiY ,if r• 'r �W \ � . ♦tiff<1 r r ^ ' 4; Y� ''"> Z; �Y. b ` , � ' jr vi"r � .W r ",� � Yy,f4} � �.�,ri,�' rlM,� ' �" ab �,,J.y � �i ',IY•� ',S .I `•• ,Mlr(Y, � 'r'lti♦♦�. 1 �1 TTT W���(''' �r.PKd�y�� 47 Ilk i / 4 r n { {•, Z ` R y, y ' `�:'�'+.�P?'� ++ �� ' ,Fly r :., ,• ..f ,,, .., r' r 4 �• 1i '' ► d.tdp NI M T� Kipt"Bg lhua • 1 1"S89 page �' red pite Ian** must be 17 ' wide between the building a e atxkia+l structure. 1t this fire Ion* were eliml , and a , ,ro lone rovI0 arsur►d the parameter of the ing tie,�4� .M ke Adosp Bug sated using turf blow ch would ncroape . t . a unt o! .�andscapp percentage o e building was fr oadats the needed fire Ian to allow for psx 96ith stated that additional tra tween the proposed *I010 were elso nesded for pedestrai Ica aced to ].00ssn up r.A#Idn408 of the building. . It r*commended to surround thi;• grant, of the building9 with MOO ' lawn to keep it cloth shill, simple. The major discussio on the parking structure r Itself. city Code requires 2 a xamps . The garage is proposed at $80 spaces on S Is There was concern over the loeatiori, of the ticket kiosk . revert stacking of card out 0nto ',Gpthssd is tbor wait t or. Daryl Smith %#as especially condirned,• 'lilith the. entraac ch. currently it may. block Irle►�6jm ;. d' dUke s not chani riffi�c int i the parking stitlxcturae' Adams s ste'd iucrea$ing the arch width to feed di,rictly iota the ing structure, one incorporating the tic et' kidsk into i t . a1.so added that perhaps adva:ided stroetslds sigi age *0 rielp direct parking. The developer stated that regular ere would know the system within a couple of . visits.... The materials bo vanointed of. green -tinted glass and two tones of polis an marble. These materials will be . Inc arporatced .w ncrete panels ohboth structures , Frank M441no rogue, s colored rendering . Amni ties ' include ' elevated pod ion 'lihkage frbm garage to building and balconies X stair steps . 1 o chanica l equip"nt will be on the roof of the_ buiWim ikee -Adva ' asked that it be acreaefted with similar . ma, .er liizadt xs i11 be • recessed at ground levee' ' haif . be +�-W 11,y flush on the upper levels , Framing will. od"O d a i. inum. fat th Man, s nation to conditionally approve the ' to 0 he14149' approvrl upon a colored robde ring . Scott , .i he ecOndod M dnd it• was passed 4-0 . Applicant: Richard Armstrong Location: Sid pacific Coast Highway Request: Taco Bell drive-tbru expansion Staff planner, Jeff Abramowitz, presented the plans for a 150 square foot addition and new signage. Special permits are DBS minutes t 1,g23dy ,s \f; n \ • 7, y I s \ 17 : J / " S III .. � + � •1A ' , 11 Iy w y_ .1 P iYV // 1(• \ , r•� • �I�/l A.rl\'�,1' ••� .5' A A' .� 9. . ' ' �1 7,4 4i p•i, IV '1,'�• InRf ifs ! A,y A y r. Ir' irt. sac i�1�1 X�e GAUSIM A Sl•: reeQ 604wil -oonfotmaeg structure and signage. Theree was ;: a ern ► ` °• s u;at*,OVi-•••o9 'the now parking lot . The project by A adjaCeint ):at.. . and dealing with an oil # I tg �aee treatment of the landscape to bar ' wiping oil tank. Scott Ness � the landscape f prom the adjacent yr, p, ', \;,.,'; ,. •{. e :,,Smith stated that more 1S 17th Qtreet, XOxic;an 98A palms slap x*' n ' theme nicely with the existing ;, dt` � �► bt Od that he would like to see more IA A n sib c '0g4ist Highway and lass emphasis in de�,Ci!t4 cik A$ part of the project and needs to 1be s 'Of VeaCPjr$+X , p +es a►ted aproposal completed in-house by *toff,, , 4t �0040'•'a iffesont treatment for parking lot 61rOU* Lion, andr- 11"t c, off 9th Street . in regards to the ►roe l :1 !:: �i�te l ' 1 1 t was discussed that trie side facades !;f �Ot rbl toro match the- existing structure. A&i bo ided with lighting or other iXletiasu There infor � Os Sr& 1*9so on it . Since Frank Higgins had j' lerft . nct enough board members present for a quorum to vote, The �0 .Lc was tabled till next stasion. Xpplicant : - Richard kntel Location: 7742 Warner Avenue i Request : ca"i6ct 70500 aqua of office building with a ree amount of rig (Ions then 45 spaces) , Tom Rogers pro d the pl eud provided a brief .history of 1 what had been >directil the Design' Review fiord, from a trevi,ous ttaeti The would not support the findings for $� he variance , "ing uterim, the architectural style had b"a► changed f t�haw -Tudor to more contesparary& .The Project: now bq*,J~? 'rbof with masonry buttress wells. The windows are i@04 � iween columns, final colors aice to be dete:rmined# ho the developers ere trying to achieve the � ioak of the Hu ou 'gyrational Rana with erarthtens bricks The building am r a blue-gray) metal. roof with light garay Otucco walls. i Smith requested rol,l.in; ' turf i substantial tteos, end f nq foundation plantings . hike Adams wanted to extend t r Ateectural treatment to wrap around the entire building* ri►i►ek alley will cdaveert to parking , and may need a letter gre0ment . The remainder of the alley could be Conde= reverted to the homeowners * The applicants antra re4usst o comes biak with a color pellet , DRR minutes ( 1925d) . � _T'n��•�y�l�"r f� �". �y ef� t� n t�� �'�4 1 y �� • � I r �+' ' �"' ' • �.� 'ly''• ` l !1 1 IS, ��kl+ • yea � �� 1 � •� 1• 9.1,'• � 1.. ,L. r t ! .'�' '.,N \t.5r'4..��.K't,l';!••1' Ji„ M ;t 'Sdwr i•! f'y'Mj�• �LIT7f ,ri yihtir ���•� 1 r •h•�1 ro Kii� IL 'TOW y 4404 f� rl e , y 1 wl w POT ft d - T M.Wq FORM J � .,1 till• r it..' 1 r I ,,,r� 1�, � � , 1 1 IA?�� •i."f',••���'1 kr4'ti�'a'' q, 1'1 '.H4, ; ; � � � , 1 I � '�a •' '.Ilr 1 t ✓J r yM •ll A s. i ••� ly • I GUILD �� y1 k 1 1+ w'. .4 . ,.. M„"...., ' r'1 • ,,, • .. '�• 1���i1► Sao i , arision Will hart be , aoroptetibl+a' 0ith kin }ptoo r, •use t e s14' i�sot' $ p�tasel Ma xktens on of the Taco b� aoe and ppEarati elf oioA w 11 det, J tol to . the neral wolfate 4 , Y h� ► Or ioi�ldint io. tb►o #iciuity 804 detrimeatal ,1 t M. p*eP st 's s ovesaents In the { 30 ►*M1.ta p,arhiri� and simulation ap 'proposed for the Tico pall 1 aBs*0n im.-„ftot adequate and does , have th potential of tins a 4" tion or oi�rculation hassr s" # o" to-the. TACO Bell, a o a • has the ni •addiioisi t * CrI t to the , . ►B is Jo peo'lfis Coast H19144or Adntb .Street. S, lliw * M of Conditloaal. Uro Paimit No* $8-57 for thr;s 04. 01 the TAco Boll Ustauran't sill adve' rx6ly a at the of the City of Huntington peach. do fir' lunation, site 1arout, and design of the proobsed Taco Bell ' sion as proposed does not properly adapt the propcood {i ktruE t to the street*# driveways and other adiacent otvve oa and uses in a harmniEous manner; t-ation end relationship of this existAng Taco Bel:! 1 �: + ' ;Eaespdt with t4o addition of the drive-thia wiziftw and lane .1 is, sat propoiclr intiegrated. a. 6"re to and parking for the proposed Taco Bell w*aneion �- a ps. crostos' undue traffic bovause it does not provide Ak aftim bud on-site circulation. , , sr JILT. _ e t: sec.�r�iarEMIT ... . to TIM Vre*0681 16 allot consistent with the goals anal objectives of the 01tir6S ftno.ral Plan, Coastal biomrat and Xcenic Highways ' pl�lents. p. Tbo; proposal is not consistent +elth the Huntington Beach Coastal Xl at• and with Chapter 3 of the California Coastal hot as proposed by the applicant by providing a drive-thru roataurent facility for beach and public recreation accEasrf bilit�, v � 1 The Taco Bell expansion aR proposed rjy Coastal Development Permit: No. U -2 dies not: conform with the Plans , policies , requirorne nts and standards of the Huntington Beech Coastal E'ement . 4 . Coastal. Development Permit No . . 89--2 is not consistent with the zoning designation of Eh$ Downtown Specific Plan-District One . 5 . Coastal Development Permit No . 89-2 at the time or completion will not provide infrastxuct:are in a manner thit , r: coin .stent with. C°-LUP by providing a dii.ve-thru lanes fo.' a?, restaurant . 1 . Strict complian,e with Article 963. and the Downtown Design Gu�delineis will not result in a substantial economic handship to the applicant . 2 . The proposea freestanding pole sign will adversely affect other sign: in the Area . 3 . The proposed freestanding pole sign will be detrimental to property located in the vicinity of such sign; and wRill not be compatible with the surrounding area . 4 . They proposed freestanding pole sign located at they interseftion of Ninth Street and Pacific Coast Highway will obstruct pedestrian or vehicular traffic vision . • . �i 1 � i wr 00011, f� Publisk : 4/2•-/8P APPEAL OF ?LAnN14G C11 'SSXCN ' S APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE XPE;RMIT NO . 88-57 IN CONJUNCTION WITH COA8T,hL DEVELOrML'NT ?9RMIT NO. 89-2 ANd DNNTAL OF CONDITIOPIAL ';:CEP': '•ON (VARIANCE) NO. 89-1 AND 'I SPECIAL uIGH rERMI'i NO. .88--8 NOTICE IS h_F-P.k;07 GIVEN th4st the Huntington ©each City Cou-g i l will ?Mold a public hearing in the council chamber at the Huntington. Beach Civic Cent"r, ZOUO rain StreeE'G-, Huntington Pesch, California , on the dates an4 at the time indicated below to re leive and consider the stetements of a,ti persons who wish to be heard relative to the applica+.ion described below. V UL4I;: Monday, May 1,, 1969 7 : 00 Ply 1 PICA,f1om: &-peal of Planning Commirsion ' s approval of Conditional Use Permit Vo . 88-57 in conjunction with Coastal Development Permit No . 89-2 and Denial. of Conditional Exception (Variance) Mo . 89-1 and Special Siyn Permit 88-8 i AFELICAfl : Richard B . Armstrong (Entitlen.. nts , including Coastal Development Permit Nj . 139-2 r•ere filed on January 9, 1989 ) Councilman John Eratkine J. Michael Thompson and Scott Kimball (Appeals Ziled on March 31 , 1989) LW - ap: Taco belle 818 Pacific Coast Highway (Nort`ieast Corner of Pacific Coast Highway and 9th Street) To permit the expansion of an existing Taco Hell restaurant by adding, a drive-thru window with a variance request. .'for parking and landscaping . The request also inc udes the remodel of a non-conforming ftoestanding pale sign. V�$ Cate§oricelly exempt pursuant to Snation 15301t Close 1 , of the Cali.rarnia Bnvironmuntail Quality Act . COAL=..,ATMO; Appealable (see below) ' ON ,ZYL ,{ A copy of the, proposed ' $-#oque' t is on file in' the City Clerk' s Office' 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, Californio 92848, for inspection by the ' public. This project is In the Appealable portion of the coastal sore. O, 1 t . A NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING (Continued) Under the provisions o,,f the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, the action by the City Couccil is final . vsI of the Coastal Development Permit is appealable to the Coastal. ^o,r.1n+6sion pursuant to Public resources Code, S . 30F0:3 . A i5nial of the Cozstal. Development 'hermit may be appealed (r . 13319 , 'title 14 , California Administrative Code% only if the City has approved a development on the basis of local lend use regulations but has denied the iasuanca of a corstail ('!evelopirent permit because it cannct snake the findings regjired by Section 13311, Tit-Is 14 of the California Adminiitretive Code . Pursuant to public Resources Code, S . 30603 , an appeal by an aggrieved person must be filed in writing w' ,:hin ten (10) working days , and addressed to : California Co?~tal Oommissi.on 245 W. Broadway, Sv,ite 390 POD 14;0 Long Beech, CA 90801-♦450 ( 213) 590•-5071 The appeal period begins when the Commission receives a notices of the City Council a^tion and continues for tern ( 10) yDi�king days . j Applicants wil! be notified by thr- Coastal, Commission as tG the date of the conclusion of the Commission ' s review period , and' rs to whether or not an appeal has Caen f .led . Applicants are advised rot � to begin construction pT;or to that date. i ALL IWTERESTED PERhONA' ai..,s i-ivited to attend said hearing and erprees opinions or submit evidence fo-, or against the application � as outlined above. All applications, exhibits , and descriptions of this proposal are on file . kith the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street , Huntington Beach, California, for inspe•.%ion by the � public . KUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL By: Connie Brockway, City Clerk_ Phone: (714 ) 536-5404 (2373d-3o4) Dated: 4/17/8:1 C•, •y''� r '. 1 ' r. r 1 IJ n •� HUW.NQJQN REACH CITY COUNCIL, F URLL.J=HI= PR=M= City Council proceedings are governed by Robert ' s Rules of Order and t'ie Brown Act . The following i u the typical sequence of events on public hearing items : A. The staff report is presented ( includes Coastal Development Psrmi ) . e. Questions by `"!-he City Council concerning the staff report may be answoxe` at this time . C. All public hearings will be opened by thu Mayor* at the some time, O. The itpplicarrt and/or appellant is given an opportunity to address Council . Timq would not be limited but left to the M8yror ' s discretion. E. The Mayor will call all speakers by name . Please proceed to the podlum. Individuals favoring and opposing thL proposal are given an opportunity to address ;:he Council if the pink public comrter:� form is filled out and given to she Sergeant-at-Arms statr••'oned near thG podium. ** Please state your, name and address , Including city, before addressing Coun�' i l . F. Council may ask questions of speakers addressing the Council . G. The public hearing is closed . H. The Council may di,sr-u ss the matter at this time . I . The Council then acts on the matter by either continuing , i approving, conditionally approving , or denying the project . I l * The ?ublic hearing may be continued or appropriate action taken. err' I Pink request forms to address Council forms are available at i S the a&it>rance to the City Council Chamber, mith the City Clerk and are also attached to the Agenda . The slip is to be given to that Sergeant-at-Alms stationed near the podium. The Mayor R will call all speakers by name. All proceedings are recorded. r' i . c , ! To 1 Wt ff." NJ llm�cc- Pent S*rvlw Information Gliarsntes A663960-3862YOURIERKME r NIr $200.00 300 FT VARIANCE -- _ i Tioor Title Ineur-wake Company of California. a Cailfornia corporation, dcas hereby guarantee KINIALL DMLOFM NT 900 c?ACIFIC COAST HWY 0209 HUNX'INGTON BEACH, CA i ATTKa SCOTT KIMALL i who, by requesting this limited guarantee agrees that V.9 liability of the company hereunder shell not exceed the liability t herein stood and shell be limited to actual lass If less than said amount, that, as appears frnm an e examirotion of Ita lot books or property indices,Information as to the matters herein spedtled pertaining to land heroin described is as follows: NAMES OF OWNERS, AADRESSIS AND ASSESSORS PARCEL WMERS OF PROPERTY U ATED WITHIN A 300 FT RADIUS OF ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 024 -123-08. No gua w t o Is made as to the validity, loged effect or priority of any matter above shown,and If the Information was requested by cell nee to sweet address,no guarantee Is made that said land is the same as slid address. Whim 31 19U9 of N 7:30 A.M. TKM TITLE IN KIN ANCE COMPANY OF"LI FORNIA By idont Attest Ssatetra'y iN11) P11l W raft Wroft the Liribft ExctuWone and L'mitations and the spoolfic asu-,-xves ,�rdvd by this , . I WWh � Immuty, or eseuranoas (rather than as contelood herein, pies" contact the ftW mWan aw to the ewallability and oeet. P,.Adw am": GM rYbomm 80OW&d.P.O.box 92FE2, Los Anooft Caftonle 90M MEMO, K x , a N� (1fA 1111t?bT�MD.wI Wtt:/IC M!NlCY d'Vllt YtiJ1T Mitt 14NOWGIM y�1�11 Olty ti01MOd wM /h�o�ld��O ptbbla/ral Ltg In Mr�c,c,�tm,+ok f.`hs"ho lw �_.-•-o1M o mosa&* r" UA„�71,�t�Mh{tIM,tIM {7 �11 t��MS� MM taro Ittdiml blotto b ttYl/ 0�60 r lla oialsog M OI A p bW*vrhv rnrlt to behood r 0100u IndM.pplim o uA1 roMvlMd O.IMr. 1T[/Tlkw:tllort w, MN I. .1 0 rM r• A1Nt1.ICATION: 67 CorntbtMron'>s Op¢rONI bl COA111" M froth No.it•11 In oOnNtrtotbb US ISO M pwtMltprbtOnl ho+M No. M•J MOO Demo 44 Car+dfMOrbM/togOOM(`r low lN.si i WIN M11OWWWO M0.gw11a/ aml 104a9+8p WA I►arnitl He.1*11#MID per, NO anI--&—! two , r ., �. t . AIMRaILAI'ITM; John/eMc" .,,, , 1•; r y J.Mb*MW tlla"MM MW SW*Mn*ld 1 �on MbuM�sr � LadTw. T000 i Its t;"Ow>) f lw,7 tl�M11M N POVAG OWN MtOlrrr - rbdl M a ''1 , r r i• t' FMOMI.TO POTWI MrrMlpAn�M+WonWIN 7Wo oeArwtcb� a or1M►-itw wln�,�pwlM n'T vlrlhhal���iMM 1N pMkt� fs1/ irO t0`tt MOt tih�bntlttMO i•) �• • gyp, t" t AwwC��tt/tA � /F"lont I, &Mkln C� At VITAEW:Adp!M,,,,��,,11��IiM/.Mw¢` v MK Or Mw A p0pv Mtlt pt+Opsbld M OA IMO M r,.Oltt'CwtrlP n t�NboO, wo WE/lriM.hwlilr;�N+n MMh��,/! *bw kM/OOMan by 1M �P�tJOt.IG N/AR!!iA f11DCMpJIM/:M MIIIIIrM. � '•� Thk pm* Or to"we porwtan of t�eavold V. un>M-N* ,n.a�`+Ibr+an,Ilmbb, 'Ci/;bW PW moon by it IM 0 POD (� IM�_�pwiilfd 1b 1'MbN01MtMawMwnMl l.r�Aw" V�IIa1A Adva- �p���bbrr .wig ill, ah Mt0 NO d Isar I011d In r p�MMrs anti ha0�ItMd b�w�radtr Ol a aaMr Mwbedwttrbtt orAtll Mew►r�a o o1 t bA ql o rov* I by TINo 4 d Iht CuA1rtM0 AwlMnbtOaMr r e aUFB rRs14rs'P I1roMrvr+Oso e�tv.ol-l'rn a/r►fw�d pr.an ntr.!60 Rltrd M rM!1�y WtIhY1b: CONbnbltt i;owllal COR6140 400116 MW odMMry,r/If 300,PW 1480. Long/00olti WON I.14M(I I')W-GO1 r t+�• ••+�' Ti�O NO"pp�eyrknd OO�er w11Mr!!r:Cort1tMNMa1�bdwa i ra s', dew ' pry C.wtttoll rolkOt�w►d aaMrwN for Iw1( W,pAtMtp AppMItM•U MtA IM I dOw Iw pw CNW'4 tterr+rebbOMon UN Rf$W et 11J O t IR- bl MM COntnMOWat1'O P�WMt pared,Obb/a/to WWOO f or NA Oit"Pod No bam am. &*"dome 11a110 MMMHOMM�plr to 00 dOM. ALL tt>sp PlAttiCNd tlnivllad p'attwM old Mtutno and d ab s or n&*d M ,OW cece~41100aa0w-M�Nrn�d WIlh UO of Abel CRv MO Mon!/KiM,,00�on irAch. CMMwrMR to►n0f�lla+by Ihl lru�Md. '. , •r•' „ WJWIWWM NAM W"061111110116.M'Yt COIItMN FROCK. WAY,CM' cwwk MOM-('10) Cabo.Al tl1F001f,Ity "� Ow 04 catrtrJl a+pp pO byM bMRt dY hoer+'.RM of brow Wtd Ifu Mown AN."m NAI+1rM1p M Ow(Wy W mmpl ol 0 wrwAAOn p0b Mw1.q A TM colt Is prwM')prtoktda�bt:a�w i�OrlldPthanl poll /. Our Mw*p el Itwt cor Ooww wM1ho rw seft Toi Rt0t' b* . tr.ttw.rad M Ihkt t0. •r, .` ♦ o , C.Ad praft haarfttp%C►i M tM mot ava C I Mt eppN WA M Ild r, 'M aNaM*1M'oMrw �. Tints aM~M nOt M bnl MIf M Mlbt ��� . n my 16 r' �t 'flew�AO�r tibN rM0♦ ►y tAbM�(aN11M NrOMw 10 M'1tJ 1 r1/ b Ott v0 Aft ON ,7 . r .tO+abMi *rra�1011r � Mw Ctruwdl. i N.IMM r1rlM Tho �di 11%014"IM M MMI Mm , 11 Iaa (1b114"0 w 4"P~*a1MW Mbbla.dtl/,dpArttgM�, �r�'• +Pw�� M owpr�a�� - `TM��p�O�ri��M too w*Ad M ", 'k�' ••l�YbM /O�bI�MI Mitts M 1 r OI UrA'wMll`b.we Ryr' �7i�dif..L,::O"�.._•_.e .�.r:a�r.k ram:: :,, i .:, �. r ' ?t, AviNwetoo 10►v4*0 AdvfrUsMminfs of &A k inC1•jdtnj pubic. '0VM 4$ by 0"100 of the Supirior Cowl Of 018n99 CGunty, C*%forN16. A•d;t1i, dicid 29 SOVIO ID01 1961, and A.1401• d@10 T1 j m, 463 STA'o OF CALIFORNIA County of iti *V* ow . WNW ""f" �.r r � r :ir� ww 1 &M a Citizen Of thft United etato"s and a rostdsnt of 00 County 4110ref M', I'M CM tNr ago of 64htaen yews. and not a par'.y to or Interested in the below entitled inst1w. 1 xm a principal clerk of the Orange Coast OAIILY PILOT. with which is comainaid the NEWS-PRESS. a +n*Wapw of general circulation, prints! and published in the City of Costa Moss, (� County of Orange, Stets of California, and that a fi Motice of .1 ub ir. Wenri rir7.- �,,..... of which Copy attached hereto is a true And complete i copy, was printed and published in the Costs Mien, faowport Such,,l un ington Beach, Fountain Valley, Irvine, the Snuth Coasrt cornrnunities and Lojuns eeuh las:M 0 said nf:wspapti, for 1 t ire Consseutive woks to wit the issue(S) of 1 r i rh . .tom...---.- . ; ,tnwn.,t4!1di� "M' tty ff l", t th torte W true Obr t. cod on, .l iftii1 198 � ►� •,`• 1 ...OP 9 l 1 �! •� lCA�+01� J' .1 y.L.iL . . ._.- _ ?. .. 1. •�rt.'.� t `� •• Publish 4/20/89 IMICAM2WILIC H'AALUM APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION ' S APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88-57 IN C.ONJUNCTION WITH COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO . 89-2 AND DENIAL OF CONDITIOUL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 89-- 1 AND SPECIAL SIGN PERM T NO. 23-8 ti NOTICC IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber dt the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. RAT /-TMM Monday, May 11 1989 , 7 : 00 PM A LtCATION: Appeal of Planning Commission ' s approval of Conditional Use Permit No . 88-57 in conjunecion with Coastal Development Permit No . 89•-2 and D•inial of ' Conditional Exception (Variance) No . 89-1 and Bpecial Sign Permit 88-8 I URLjr.$NT: Richard B . .Armstrong, � APPELLANTS: 'Councilman John Erskine J . Michael Thompson : and Scott Kimball LOCATION: .:1-o„ Bell, 818 Pacific Coast Highway (Northeast corner of Frcific Coast Highway and 9th Street:) T: To permit the expansion of an existing Taco Bell restaurant by adding a drive-thru window with a variance request for parking and landscaping . The request also includes the remodel of a non-conforming freestanding pole sign. fijAk $PATS: Categorically exempt pursuant to Section 153011 Class 1 , of the Califorriia Ever i onm*dnt a 1 Quality Act COAST,A,_,114 STI = : Appealable (sae below) Om FILE: A copy o ', the: proposed request is on file in the City Clerk' s Office, 2000 Main Street , Huntington Beach, California 92848, for inspection by the public . Thi$ pri ect is in the �. . ralsble portion of the coamtal zone. Under the provisions of the Wintington Beach Ordinance Code, the fiction taken by the City Council is final unless an appear to riled to the California Coastal Commission by the applicant or an sggriewed party. 1 - '. IL "ROW °+k r t• i NOTICE C.V PUBLIC HEARING (Continued) Said appeal mus" be in writing and must be set forth in detail the actions and groundi by and upon which the applicant or interested party deems himself aggrieved . Said appeal• must be submitted to the City Clerk' s office within ten ( 10 ) working, days of the da%;e of the Commission' s action:. There is no fee for the appeal of ai coastal dove lopment permit . Action taken by the planning Conunission may not be appealed directly to the Coastal Commission unless 7itl.e 14 , Section 13573 of the C.-lifornin Administrativo Code is applicable. Section 13573 ( a) (3 ) states that an appeal may be filed directly with the Coastal Commission if the appellant was denied the right of local appeal because local notice and hearing procedures for the development did not comply with the provisions of this article . The other three grounds for direct appeal do not apply . If thn above Condition exists , an aggrieved parson may file an appeal within ten (10) working days , pursuant to Section 30603 of the public Resources Code, in writing to : California Coastal Commission 245 W. Broadway, Suite 380 POB 1450 Long Beach, CA 90801-1450 (213 ) 590-5071 The Coastal Commission review period will commence after the City appeal period has ended and no appeals have been filed , Applicants will btu notified by the Coastal Commission as to the date of the conclusion of the Coastal Commission review. Applicants are ad-�ised not to begin construction prior to that date . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and exprees opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. All applicationF , exhibits, and descriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street , Huntington Beach, California , for inspection by the public. HUNTINGTON BFAGH CITY COUNCIL By: Ccnnie Brockway, City Clerk Phone: (714 ) 536-5404 Dated: 4117/89 �.•!L � a•.� T�..mow --'ir� -- _ - -,.4�_ - - - _.._ _ � .�---� ---� -°-- - PRESORT- - _ Nigtim of F"t, MOVE PA 4• _ PLAZA DE LAS GOBTBS 4 i Ra 117.Q MADRW. S?'AU4 2 8014 y-_ 4U' -'t - -050-49 F co i r• .,t A a 4 • .j. _. �•' �1 . �'• bpi • ,1 r � `'� "�� . '�' ,C a{'?Je -x � S♦ - -r• � r -_� • ; 1, {y -�. •. ..r J rA1Rr��a y 'r` r" Ap ♦ , At _ • emu. - - � - - .' 3 r i ar r Y r rp �• 1 1 � r , 4 1 • � r I I _ 1 it of Auntan ton Beach ow.r�.� vwcwr+ _ r 7. C 7 A WV I" CALIFORNIA 9M" GENE LUCAS �;' : •��. � '.; ` 1 E OC;A. AVE #126 6 u� ' if NTINGTAN BEACH, CA 92649 897-•050-26 c i of ft CIS►owl, h � i GtY of Huntington Beub F.0,Pox 190 CALIFORNIA 92646 ' ~' .• {' �'` h' 1 ' PAUL VON LUFT 9775 LA CAPULA AVE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 897-050-22 a III its it it III,1III� 77 ::�• SIMMY 5+ P all,,.- ;.�` '� OCLU AVE 0312 a � MrM 5811CH 4 CA 92648 ' y , 1r • Of N*of the City Clark � Icity of Huntington Beach �'�Milrl�rwl�► rr��rlr*[. .r-10' 1: ' �i fi b A T .,: --i • i ' ` ;r . P-a !"Ito CARLOS L. HATUAWAY , 273? MENDOZA DR .r COSTA MtSA, 91.626 024-122-09 •1•F • virrwwl "m♦ orq 40%vew \y.•1r,1�11.. .•yr... •• . .. � yIjy`\ •r1+ City'. of 'Huntington Beach • t, i,. ,. �' 1J r+rr'WA. f ti f t' �'. ' '•i ) .� �{ • �l 1 + P.O.lax 1w CALIFORNIA 92648 � .,+ .� r Y26q�,, � HtIN'C rNGTON BEACiI B 115 8TH ST HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 H�4���rItN NOVO 024•-123'MI07 ;:- 1I11 rlrlrll fill 1111111 lilt fill VO OHN 2 8CHWARTZ ET AL aCtCW;1 I l r? UNTINGTO JBACH. CA 92648 1 ! Ilrlrro oil lrllurlrrllrrlrilrl�I�r,rrrllrr�rrl�rlrr� t POOP i r. •.Yr. 1 ��• l �'�.v.JL�'� �'�J.A.I_d..nJ U� If. F V. )NLTON BEACH � of,rr �4�awt DATE Publ i sh : 4/2 0/8 9 a nor ytrur approval. c R your request. a For your%ipmtture. Cl F your inforrrution, V Take sap WJ&tar action. P ^re ropi%- for my ttineta..re. O 11eturrtwithm"dotaiit. Wei 41 3SION ' S APPROVAL OF Li' 1-vostig6te sM reputt. to and return to me. i 13--57 IN CONJUNCTION WITH rl NOM and it"rrw about this o Note Gild fiia. ET Na. 8 9-2 AND DENIAL OF o (VARIANCE) NO . 8 9-1 AND ---• = . TI LIEPMONE ?.ERM T m '1 O. 8 8-8 MW _ w TIME!CAt.Lip bA p CALLST *ELEPHONE NO. 4 t i ng to n be a�Ch City rnunc i 1 will �362 �1 Chamber at the hi:1 '.,,gton Beach os .tington ''each, Calif +pia , oil the w to receive and conLider thsr r lie to be heard relative to the _-+y' ,.,,a�. �SSJ_-_- 7 : 0 0 PM ommission ' s approval of.PP #71 - ��. � it No . 0R-5^ in ccnjunctio with Permit No , 89-2 .and Denial of DEPT. �. bn (Variance) No . 89--1 and Special TRANSMITTAL AND TELEPHONE SLIP ('�Ci`Ll1. 1Vl i AlUllatLU aD . nL1Nrit,.LVtSY (Entitlements , including Coastal Development Permit No . 89-2 were filed cn January 9 , 1989 ) MRSLLANTS ; Councilman John Erskine J. Michael Thompson find Sco*+: Kimball. (Appeals filed on Harsh 31, 1989) LM: Taco Lell , 818 pacific Coast Highway (Northeast earner of pacific Coast Highway and 9th Street) $SQL r ' : To permit the expansion of an existing Taco Bell restaurant by addiny a drive-thru window with a variance request for parlting and la>ndsce iny . The request also includes the remodel of a non-conforming freestanding pole sign . mwr Q tEN13T, J TaRTIj : Categorically exemp�: i�ur suant to Section 153011 Class 10 It the ,California Environmental Quality Act . CiOiJ�S . BTU,: Appealable ( see below) Qi-. A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City .:lerk' g Office, 2000 Kafir. Street , Huntington beachp California 92649 , for inspection by the public,, PUBLIC hai tM ,ElQ,QAlMDUUS: See attached . This project is in the Appealable portion of the coastal. Zone . 4{ Orly i' BIl?V'1rw EUGLIII E AI,1.1- 1' ME!U,K ANDER SUN MEHLER Tit 1248 N. WIiITF, AVI: Fi, ;.1 '!'lt 74--�170 REINS ►-.'.', 1i l7? )1VA, (�l'� 9 ! ?fits r„ T'H�:.)I.ISAND PALMS CA 92276 E!f A(:I{, CA 92648 ' AF . 0 4 1 1. 18 .c, ; '22. 10 0.14- :.23-14 T1C.UMA� A . L'!,,:�; W+I is h: Y u s :"c1.1!,L )(NIN 4 'I'lloh-.SON d l ii i 1()'l S )iA':' FRONT 141 VTA UNDTN . HUN'X' l�dGU)N ill:.`,(..!f . (:, ?7, ,;?1 }1;'�LBO)A TSLAIII.", CA -•�;06 1JI:W1'OIt'C 13}',aC;l', (.�. 91663 12) 11 0424 123- r ANTHONY is URSINO 'Tit i:hit'►' :„,.,�.?;I?i,l +, l`V;;).YN 1, COCI-ARAN 124 8Ttl ST li4 203 H'i'fl - 'i' '.`� 11'i'II ST ;t �.i T{ � CA 9 i=�[�f} ININT(KTON REACH, f,,A 9264H 024-- 024-• l 23- 01 GARKY �?ANI)T.,IN ANT IONY }: . URSI No ANDRE:WJ ?- VA:.OF F TR '5 c, S, 121, t�'i.'H 'C !14 ! 1323 I: t11)I,ir:�> 1 I,, ,f.l'II �,. L' BEA(li , GA 92(.,48 W WITTIER, CA 90606 HUNTINGTON f31' 1�.,i1, CA 9264a 0;'4- 11. 7-- 024-123-03 024-1214...02 i E:1`GA1:UO G. U11.Ti.: UOr, C NCiRl125 GENE; PRIBBLE j 2436 BEL INDA ST 123 8TH ST 6407 I NANCE CR WEST COVINA, (:A 91742. HUNTINGTON BEAC:I, C1, 9?648 ORANGE, CA 926bo) 024--1 2:!--01 024--17.3-04 024-124-03 RICI�/1ItD A. H1#It1.OW JC�SEP11 A NAPP:1 SURENDRA P I1ARGT 111 10TE1 ST 1. 191� t?TfI ST, 720 PP.CtIC COAST.' IiGJY HUNTINGTON �iEACH, CA 92647 IIUNTI14GTON BEACH, CA 92648HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92�48 024--12 2-02 02-,-1231-0'5 02 4-124-10 STATE OF (;AL IF ORN IA Tt10MAS G. CAMPRELL HUNTINGTON BEACH I{ STATE OF GENERAL SERVICES 116 LOTH ST ll:i 8TF{ ST Sc'�CR,�tS�.NT.0 CA 95514 I}UN'I:IkyC'tON .VEAC111, Cry 926w8 1Il'?�''1'?NGTON PlE�?CH, CA 92648 ' 0?3-•170- 08 024-122--0S 024-.123--07 024-125-01 EDWARD %J . SUPERNOWIC7 RICHARD B ARMSTRONG TR ALEX O7,F,ROFF BOX 4 RhNr.'HO DLL SOL 2964 OCEANSIDE BLVD STE 711 OCEAN AVE #101 CAMLN09 CA 95709E OCEANS1:DE, CA 92054 HUNTINGTON BRACH, CA 92648 024- 122--04 024_.125-001 897-050--01 WILLIAM R. PAXSON GOVINDRNAI PATEL flq-( C) • 115 9TH ST 8791 GARDEN GROVE ELVD 0• c'k 7c- r7 HUNTINGTOV BEACH, CA 92648 GARDEN GROVE , CA 92641 �'�'' '�d 024-122-0 024-1 z5-old U24-122-07 024-123-1U C"W3 1,- HATHAWAY NANCY J MOORE GUARDIAN SAVINGS A LOAN 2717 M'dN'DOZA Dot P 0 BOX 257 5200 WARNER AVE SUITE 20 CO"A NZ6Ap CA 92626 HUNTINGTON BEACH, GA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACHo CA 92649 024-122-09 024-123-13 897-050-02 w: hl ;� a a`f �tlr hA A1.LI;14 1:U }It'►1 '.I.N(;I.' 943 HARVAED S'I j (7; 'AN AVl; #4 'S SANTA MONICA . (;k 9040.1 iliJHI' 'JGTUN BEACH , (V. 926,",d IL HALL AND A!,SC)LI.A'1HS, t'}i:,1;1,�;:, ,"► t("I ::f:i it'i'` : I` `�c - �Iny ! � 8281 BOLSA, AVE MIDWAY CITY , CA 926.55 Ill1N'.'.')".rdi�"li)rl li1;ACIl , C:1 92048 I � .� 'sic � �•+s-r 897-•0')0- 89 897-050- 99 E CLARY, B AUMONT »_GPER11 F 1)ffl N K, 200 VI.A M1rN'rti1JL; Y<tVPDET IiFACH , CA 92661 I-Ay1f,, A1t101"IF?^1) , CA 923.59 897-050-90 7 - YVONNE S RFES11A ET AI, G.l.PALD 1), EHL E, 6249 RIVIERA CIA 920 C01,I)1?NHOD DR � r I ONG BEACH , CA 903! 5 COSTA NESA I CA 92,62.G 1397- a',rj. U 1. 897--05 1 -U 1 ,r i (,hl21t 1.1) HANESFARGARET NADINE: LABORDE 00/ P 0 BOX 6519 1544 Btl00KWiVEN � ANAHEIM, CA 90720 PLACENTIA , CA 92670 897-050-92 F97-051-02 JOAN (' GARNER I?IC^,RDO GUTIERREZ--1,13E, flax 18209 19112 HOMESTEAD LN ANAHEIM, CA 92817 11UNTINGTON BEACR, (,A 92646 M91-050-93 897-051-03 HUNTINGTON PACIFIC BEACH I.'r AL JEI'F REY BARNES WAYMAN P 0 BOX 4093 235 LOWER CLIFF DIt Ig'0d 5- F� �ky�wA~' F/15i PALM ";ESEWI, CA 92261 LAGUNA BEACH , CA 92651 �.n��Y�+t,, ('A eta 7 897-050-94 897-051-04 PAL 1, MORRIS `rP JOSEPH E TRZANO Tlt 1506 SUGAR LOAF DR F C BOX 429 w µ �`viJ`t, • FLINTRIDGE, CA 91011 WATER'rCWN , CT 06795 ��� p0 - a N 897-050-95 89 7-0. 1 5 -05 1.001 g �acis, CX q(v sl �lY ROGER 9 DEANE ET AI, HUNTINGTON PACIFIC BEACH ET AL 711 OCEAN UNIT 423 14038 SUMMIT DR HUMNOTOW )SEACF., CA 9Z648 WHIT'I,IER, CA 90602 897-051-06 NouT E wCowe J . Michael Thompson l OCEAN AY4 0424 Scott Onball INCT(* '1 UCH, CA 92648 18025- K Sky ark cast Irvine, CA 92714 Win- .I r i 1 r MO Tl1 i 1 ,JOAN D AIRNCLD-,18p1NAK AJAIALABW E'ANK.A►RAM HUNTINGTON PACIFIC REACH w 1725 S DOUGI A35S RP 3UITH C 31 iCAY PALI 11 OCEANA'�E �`�pWAMEIM CA 9280G Llllit s YAUI, HI 96761 �NTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 + !!S —050-28 8y7-050•.38 897-050-48 STERIN N."NES PETEP MACS PLAZA DE LAS CORTES 4 2425 N GRAND A 2031 P..A.14CHO LA MERCER DR 1 RD IZq 8ANU ANA, CA 92705 COVINA, CA 91724 MA RID , SPAIN 8014 897-050-29 897-050-39 897r-050--49 ROWAN WFAVER, JR ET AL °ATRICIA A BONNETT VASAAT11 KUMAR 711 OCEAN AVE 0204 3036 GAF8,1 LN 7.1.1 OCEAN AVE A306 HUNTINGTON BEACH , CA 92648 COSTA MESA , CA 92626 11UNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 897-050-30 897-050-40 897-050-50 G ROBERT WOOLSEY & SHEIT, PAULINE M COOPER DAVID 0 RIBEIRO 2427 HALL AVE P G BOX 723 P 0 BOX 1861 ANAHEIM, CA, 92804 HUNTINGTON >31 CF., CA 92648 WHITTI%R, CA 90609 897-050-31 897-050-4i 897-050--51 ROP.ERT STEVEN GOLDMAN JATM.E GARCIA MENDEZ GEORGE E ART TR ET AL 711 OCF.M AVE #206 6291 FAIRLYNN 758 E CASAD ST HUNTINGTON BLEACH, Ci% 9261-8 YORBA LINI?A , CA 92686 COVINA, CA 91723 897-050~-32 897-050--42 897--050-52 i WDOLPH C BALDONI WILLIAM C WONACOT'T ET AL JAMES M TSUJIOKA ET AL 1 RUE CHATEAU ROYAL 7123 SANTA ANITA CIR 5351 MA:tVIEW DR NEMRT )SUCH t CA 92660 BUENA PARK o CA 90620 LA PA'LMA, CA 90623 897-050-33 897-050-43 897-050-53 MICHAEL R NI'EMEYER ET AL ROBERT M BUSCH S'TEPHEN P YORK 3201 BONNIE HIM, DIt 902 W G'LENEAGLES DR 71l 6CErAN AVE #312 HOLLYWOOD, CA 90068 PHOENIX , Az 85023 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 I 897-050--34 897-050-44 897-050-54 GILBRRT L FRIES RICARDO GUTIERREZ--LEE YVONNE S REESHA 3311 VENTEIRE DR 0112 H014f;=EAD LN 6249 RIVIERA CIR WMI.NGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 LONG BEACH, CA 90815. 897-050-35 897-050--45 897-050-55 MICHAEL R YOUNG ET AL RAYMOND E ANDERSON HUNTINGTON PACI71C BEACH, ET AL 30732 LA NZR 26712 WESTVALE RD 12305 OXFORD DR LAWNA XXGUEL p CA 92677 PA'LOS VERDE PENINSULA, CA 90274 LA MIRADA, CA 90638 $91-050-36 897-050-46 897-050-56 MUAM RAY 4ALE M LEA GREER JOHN POLK kA g ROfALTY DR 0130 818c BURNHAM CIR 8231 TEhRY DR !1 *M, CN 91767 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUyTINGTVN BEACH, CA 92647 �.os 897-050r-47 897-050-57 II 1' qy Ir 1' ,• em ! o^u i FAT11 4 J, $RIC$ON THOMAS E NEEPR M .,GEORCE E ART TP• 18 BRIMR&LL DR 1�336 N 1�x�t81D6 DR %� 758 B GASAD Sr pA49 81fAIMOSs CA 92262 ` OOS ALAMIrOS , CA 90720 COVINA, CA 91723 897-050-03 897-050--14 89 7-050-24 LT 4L GEORGE W ROBERTS RHODORA, 1, HOOD 11801 HIGHVIEW DR 21821 SF.A.CREST LN 437 P!5F:0 UE LA PlAYA SAIMA ANA, CA 92705 HUNTINGTON NEACHO CA 97.6/48 REDONDO BEACH, CA 90277 U97 -050-04 897-050-15 897•{050-25 JOHN C ?RXNCE ROBERT N. WAKE14AN D GENE LUCAS 711 OCUN AVE #105 1372 APSLEY RI, 711 E OCEAN AVE #126 KUNTINGACN BEACH , CA 92648 SANTA ANA, CA 92705 ralI t'TING"ON Al?A("t{, C& 92648 897-050-05 897-050-1 G 89 7-050-26 PATRtClA A BONNCT'C TR C B WRIGHT ET AL EAT'TAGI,IA ASSUCTAI'EO I 3436 CAPRI LN 7925 SOUTHWIND CIR 18872 ,MAC ARTRUP BLVD COSTA HESA, CA 9261 t) HUNTI.NGTON BEACH, CA 92648 IRVJNE, CA 92715 897--050-06 897-050-17 897-050-27 BONNIE J WYATT JONN GOLDMAN TR LT Al, P 0 BOX 115 324 E AVENIDA COR.DOBA MIDWAY CITY, CA 92655 SAN CLEMI:NTE, CA 92672 897-C 30--07 997-050-•1.8 tWT, ,NGTON PACIFIC BEACH JOHN LEWIS CAPITANO 1882: DILAWARE ST SU.ITE 1.01 711 OCEAN AVE #Ilq WUNTINGTON BEACH , CA 92655 11UNTINGTON BEACH , CA 92648 897-050-08 897-050-19 J D SMITH CRAIG THCMPSON 2120 HILL ST #304 711 OCEAN #120 LONG BEACH, CA 90806 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 897-050-09 897-050-20 LINDA CAROL Y'UPPA JEANNE OELSTROM 16131 SANTA BARBAR.A LN 711 OCEAN AVE #121 HUNTT,NGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HJNTINGTON BEACH9 CA 92648 897-030-10 897-050-2! J3HN E SCHWkRTZ ST AL PAUL VON LUFT 711 XAM AVE #111 9775 IA CAPILLA AVE 111JN','IMW BEACH, CA 92648 FOUNTAIN VALLEY , CA 92708 91r-O o-i 897-050-22 MIX AND1241 011 PLAU DE LAS CGRTES 4 1610 0 �; FM4T MAaRID 28014 KOPM NOMA, CA 92663 SPAIN 1 ,-OSQ 897-050-23 wur s tooti 7�7ww. #113 ' INUR. CA 92648 S, CR � ''•r sun* J k1U A M -WAADI „ NICHOLAS U DE14CHAK STBRYN NANNES Tk� ET AL 3166 ORLANDO RD 411 OCEAN AVE #326 711 OCEAN AVE #40 i FASAIDSHA, CA 91107 UNTINGtON BEACH, CA 2648 Htm*TINGTon BEACK, CA 92648 997-050-58 89 7 -050-68 897-050-78 DAVID C VANDER HEIDE J D SMITH ROBERT WA.SSERMAN ET AL ill (K±EA1.V AVE #317 2120 HILL ST #304 5284 LAKEVIEW CANYON RD HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 LONG BEACH , 2,A 90806 WESTIAKE , CA 91.362 897-050-59 897-050-60 8 '91-050-7 9 � ANNE J HAZZELi•A DIXIE. BATEMAN WILL,IAM T DUMBALD 4 EAST 64TH ST 1708 ASPEN VILLAGE WAY 71.1 OCEAN AVE #407 NEW YORK, NY 10021 VEST COVINA., CA 91791 HTINTTING'rm BEACH, CA 92648 897-050..60 897-050-70 897-050-E0 i JOAN ; BROOKS WILLIAM EATTAGLJA EUGENE: S S7ROUT P 0 BO.X 6387 14524 S CARMINITA RD 16152. BRIr41ALL LN CAAYJN LAKE , CA 92380 NORWALK, CA 90650 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 897-050-61 897-050--7 1 897--050-81 CL•IF?ORD J L.ABORDE NORMAN L H.AWES ET AL NANCY J MOORE 1544 BROOKHAVEN AVE 711 OC&IN AVE #330 711 OCEAN AVE #409 PLACENTIA, CA 92670 HUNTINGTON :TEACH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 897-050-62 897-050-72 897-050-82 PHILIP E ZARA RICHARb J BATTAGL1A JAMES T MARZANO 711 OCEAN AVE 0321 711 OC'.AN AVE #331 711 OCEAN AVE #410 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 697-050-63 897-050-73 897-050-83 HUNTING-TON PACIFIC BEACH JOHN 0 STAPLES ,11Z NANCY J 1100RE 11180 VARNER AVE SUITE 151 711 OCEAN AVE, 943 1iARVARD ST FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 SANTA MONICA, CA 90403 897-050-64 897-050-74 897 -050-84 DOROT Y H AUTRY ET AL JEANNE A ORLSTRON IRVING SINGMAN 1726 LAKE ST 711 OCEAN AVE #402 1251 OAKGLENN AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH , CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BF,ACH, CA 92648 ARCADI.A, CA 91006 897-050-65 897-050-75 897-050-85 PAMLA AN9ITA JAYE ET AL DUANE RONAN GFORGE; APPEL 711 OC»AN AVE #324 711 OCEAN AVL P403 RD#1 BOX 651-A HUNTINMN BEACH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92.648 HARVEY' S LAKE, PA 18618 897-050--66 897-050-76 897-050-36 PAMCK N Sty" JOHN PAUL ERSKINE PAMELA BYRD 2#46 01MINE DR 711 OCEAN AVE 0404 10672 LINNELL AV9 ' "M LINDA, CA 92686 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 CARDEN GROVE, CA 92643 , '1 897-050-77 897-030--87 a y 4 h y+1 M *tC Gee 4rrleA�s BzQnt Haw;,ins Chris volt�ern / Roh Riddell- ��� �q III? 9th S tz�:et Apt f 1 11; Oth Street � liuntinr�can Beach, Ca. 92�i47 Uwntington Deitch, Ca. 92647 MAK Howell Chris Wzi rden Apt A Apt . V, 122 9th Street 1.11 9th St,reset ftntin q.:Lon beach , CA. 92647 Huntington Beach , Ca . 92647 M/M/ Felton Burt Uchihari Apt, H Apt. 13 122 9th Strrunt 112 yeti Street Muntinyton Beach, CA . 92647 Huntington Baac:h, Ca , 92647 M/K Sage Mike and Theresa Psantor:i Apt , c Apt 14 122 9th Strobt 112 9th Street Huntington Beach, CA . 92647 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92647 01M Colan / Kratz 61, 11 & Pat Todd Apt. 17 Apt 45 122 14th Street 112 9th .Strut Huntington Beach , Ct., 92647 Huntington Beach , Ca . 926,17 wills aim Paxon Car:zi.e and Loren Peycki. 11:5 9th Street Apt 06 Hunti.i9ton Beach , Ca. 92647 112 9th ,Street Huntington Beach, Ca . 92647 Mr. Patel , Quailty Inn Craig Koeh1sr 600 Pacific Coast Highway Apt 17 Huntington Beach , Ca . 92647 .112 9th Street. 4Huntington Beach, Ca . 92647 Thomas Kircht+ez ,/ Nicholas Schleieh C& fOrni.e Coe li;l Apt. $8 '45 Broa y, � 112 9th street 2445 ��� Huntington grAach, Ca . 92647 POBLon a CA 90. a. too Ca MNI-14SO k Office of the Cft Ckwk S wow • City of Huntington BcachPOE - P.O.00X 19O CAUFOW41A 92b J3 • AY ?7 3? i}OZ.� i73 ;� ..�SA , CA 92626 -J24-122-07 .t 1 .,r II I i7• - � 7 I I I I t - � J r r' r o of ft city Clark City of Huntington BC2.r • � v �r . ti Cl ;:•�.:y.:F r � � r T h P.G.BOx 190 C ALIFON1'1IA 226M ��� �VT �_TUiip�4697-050-54 i �� OCEAN AVE #312 TINGTON BEACH, Cep 92648 �'� r Of% *W tft City Clerk _w ._ • .. ,.� `'� City of Hunting ton �e��h � "I wx 190 CALIFORNIA 92 F i'►�� �' , r �' `� .: r rV :h 1 E OCEAN A E #126 p TINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 � al $97-050--26 �{i{eeee{i{illeie{ee�{e�{eele{i��eeeie{�ee{ee{�e�e�� 71 ti � \ri6ti�,•+' PY1 Yar 'i by d +:� .R:,I�: ,� . •. :7"'.h 1 =pub �R � 1 • r; , •►' ` 4• �" 1,.._...'+'�`y"�. .". 1 fit' �. ... - • �i I office 0f the City Cleric nM r City of Huntington Beach #'R E SU kWf r P.O.Boxin CALIFORNIA ���.1� ��� �Aoq BSI ACI1 11Afu hilmr, • I Is fi'111 ST ` Nuwt ir�g,tan Hamm Dcv° HUNT [N :,roh (11;ACil , ("A 92fit, i752 Seabneeze Newt:Lngton Beach, CA 1'3•-07 92649 f" _ tj Off Ice at the City Cie►rk .IM.w rf M....v• w w•�a- City of Huntington Beach Pt�fSUPT 16.0.6OX 190 CALIFORNIA 9260 FIRST C L I C S 41%; '1 �I...•'1! � 1 f L� BE ON EUCEN-V AD L EN 121i N WHTT,. AVE Vill 0M0 CA 91768 A 6-18 { rf�A0 { +ter 11,10 y Off' Huntington Buc . . ._.. . .,...... . �, „�_� �, , too CIILIFORN - ;� Lvor- v VL 71). OCEAN AVE #331 "TINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 897-050-73 _ __•... A►T 11 O12Z43C 1 FWD TIME EX- Po SATTAGLXA' W1LL1Ati 193,Y1 NCDDLAMO LIN HUNT 'BEACH CA 926,443 Offkm of me City cleft City of Huntington Bcach rf. , ,.,'� ° 8 r1 i1 7 ) 1' �"� ia0(Ito CALIFNIA!+ t �� ��z� 10 N gT.= "! UNTINGTON Br,ACH 115 8TN ST HUNTINCTON BLAC}I, CA 92648 rt�su��G«rtY a�o'��s � 024-123-07 �JNKNaW 1 A��,MP'TEa� �--- / a SUCH %UMBER .rW ly J 1, J AID � sm in C'kLIFORNIA 02W ' :i 71' i r 13, . fl y �+ c'AUL VON LUFT �• 9775 LA CAP ILIA AVE C a' 4� FOUNTAIN VALLEY � CA 92708 7 897-.050-22 ��IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIt1�11�t11I�ll�l�llll'1lII�III1�11 w/1fict of the City Clot �s• ..•..r.. ._... .Ty`' . , City of Huntington Beach ��:• P.O.m 190 CALIFORNIA 9 3'! � i� ' ; \ / 1h, ' J wr RUDOLPH C BALDONI -jC 494 ,� i I RUE CHATEAU ROYAL ,,! NUPORT BEACH, CA 92#4 1410 >?97-050-33 4; 'k•.a •. • r 1 t 44• 'h 1 fic e _ OWA*Gftwcftyclock 1. City of Huntington MIFOMU 9264i j}y_+f ga CA Q UUFi' F' ✓ y c r ; C_4PILLn AVE cl VALLEY, CA 92708 1 S i y-7 7,5' III ►1.11�> #tt,>>II:,#,�#€ :�. !-2-7 i s 'J � J lop j CALIFORNIA 9 �� ��f � , � \ •` ' "%VTON EUGENE OLLEN 12�4 9 N.. VHYTE yr�L.�r POMONA, CA 91768 024-116-18 1�1�l111lIIIICI'I'IIlI11�1'fill� ofto o1"m city CIO* 0f Huntington Beach 'City o � � runYO H4 -• - i# w•� i. t CARLdS Tj. T WA .oe� 2737 IXNDOZA DR COST,, MFSA, CA 92626 02G-12 2--09 a4 -' .r1ri� r � i yy- . 00ft of do*Chyr Cl*rk 7 ....... . .. ' . ` t 7;.2 .00UOT AVE #407 � HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 9264C�•,�" f �l6 8 y7-050--80 IDUM 11 n;LZ21321 FWD TIME IEXP0 pa BGX 2' CA . Ef1.R ��� Vi.�.•..;.�,:ellilti��„111141II J offim „""• �.... w f J'`--""-""mow of ON city clalt 1 City of Huntington Bcach lk- I►� carroRNu�9 ^j: y x 1 o r f -- bb Apt. 0 V11 T� 122 9th treet �+ 8untlinu cn Be Och CA. 92647 EAGLE RETURN TO SENDER MOVED LEFT NO ADDRESS I�II111{�I�Y�'lll+11�'III Itdoll � f .i�.1'. 1 'r Ir•;7�f 1 h �� �� rr SI, a ' a. 41 i^ Mom' .emsAmn .� MOM Beach V � I lu UWE d-. OHN E SCSdWARTZ ET AL 1 OCEAN An #11 I WS J* T1NGTON DEJACHt CA 92648 897-1)50-11i +.+ If the CRY Clerk / .1 ,, 1:1�� w••�� ` J. f.W, of Hu�tl,� �o n Bcac�x ,�;t'��N . �, �:_�:��_•_.,,,may.,, „ CALIFORNIA 126" 145i4 8 CAILMINITA 857-050-7 1 Lv�{w'� ��•� '••,.''mow t _ , H�'• (♦ / (k;- � \`6 5 '>P • Y r 1a. , 1 I v i' ' ur CITY OF HUNTINLe ION BEACH 2= MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 926M OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK NOTICE OF ACTION COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PXRMIT NU ,APPULABL8 DEVELOPMENT ,r i Applicants __.. 29 n JiLlt&.__S.1Lit_C� Oceanside, LA., 92054 Re q u e 8 t : .�_.._10- mii.t_the—ex,xd nssi.an.u�ac��r;.3.s iar}-Iarc�.8+a.1-1.-r`ar #.a�► ,a► --- b;• adding a dri ve-thru window with a variance raque_�t for _ park.{riy and �l andscapi ng. The request also includes the remodel of a non-conforming f reel tandi ng pole sign. Location : - 1'a,o Bell , 818 pacific Cciost 11IS way (Northeast_corner of Pacific Coast Highway and 9th Street) Date of Approval -. May 1 , _1 y89 Your appl ' catioj was acted Napoli by the Huntington Beach City Council 01A VY 9 989 and your request was : Approved Conditionally approved ( .see attached) Denied Withdrawn M Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach ordinance Codes the action taker by ``he City Council is final . * roval of t.hAs development is appealable to the Coastal Commisuion I*VsuAnt to PRC 8. 3O603. A denial may be appealed ( b . x3319, Vtlo 140 y Csl i tof als Ad alniotrative t1ode) only if the City has approved a developmenton th* basis of local land use regulations but has denied � the issuance of a coastal dievelopment permit because it cannot wake th• f,�ndinge required by sictiYon L3311 , Title 14 of the California Administrativ* .,ode. f1hMrMe��71t1 ,,�' A ,�